<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Qw23</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Qw23"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Qw23"/>
	<updated>2026-10-01T01:46:57Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Young_mass_murderers&amp;diff=1432800</id>
		<title>Talk:Young mass murderers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Young_mass_murderers&amp;diff=1432800"/>
		<updated>2018-07-12T01:39:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Should we be showing the pictures of the killers? */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==&amp;quot;Mass Murder&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
This is a very strong term, and here, it seems to be used disturbingly broadly, so what's the exact definition? Does suicide count into the &amp;quot;mass&amp;quot;? Is somebody who kills himself and one other person a mass murderer? --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 15:21, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, apparently, &amp;quot;mass murder&amp;quot; now also means &amp;quot;wounding and intending to kill many people&amp;quot; since Andy reverted my edit. I won't bother to make additional edits to this. Already got a warning block for this (among other things, like the high crime of cleaning up Conservative's mess), so whatever. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 16:55, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, the title is awkward, but we know what it means. I'm open to suggestions and can &amp;quot;move&amp;quot; the article to a new title if a better one can be found. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;but we know what it means&amp;quot; - Ed, I'm glad that you (or Andy) weren't around when Britannica or other encyclopedias were looking for editors. Since this article is in the mainspace and thus a part of an ''encyclopedia'' (and since there is no article text giving this table any context), the headline has to be correct and not some wishy-washy &amp;quot;Yeah, I know it's wrong, but it sounds great!&amp;quot; placeholder.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I would vote for a move to Andy's userspace since the entire point of this &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;article&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; table is to give Andy a more convenient way of mocking liberals (&amp;quot;Liberal response: Poem comparing it to environmental harm&amp;quot; - Gosh, other people call that &amp;quot;victims trying to deal with a tragedy&amp;quot;, but hey, whatever works to make a cheap point!) and casting tragedies into a light that makes me doubt that the table is supposed to be more than satire (&amp;quot;Belief: wore black entirely&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Belief: targeted Christmas shoppers&amp;quot; - I feel like I'm reading The Onion.).&lt;br /&gt;
:::To be honest, I don't see much encyclopedic value in this table. Especially not in its current form with the columns and &amp;quot;beliefs&amp;quot; mentioned above. If we cut out the &amp;quot;Liberal response&amp;quot; column, clean up the last column, find all sorts of sources, and write an entire article around the table, then we could move it to &amp;quot;List of school shootings&amp;quot; or something (which in turn might be a candidate for a category instead of a dedicated article).&lt;br /&gt;
:::But that is somewhat like trying to rebuild a car when you just start with one damaged wheel: Sure, you could repair the wheel and then build a car around it, but why not just build a car in a more logical order (starting with a motor or chassis)?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Maybe move the table to some workbench outside the mainspace and see if people are dedicated enough to tinker with it. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 17:35, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jenkins, I didn't read through all of your long-winded comments above.  But as I said on your talk page, a Wiki is for ''adding'' and/or ''improving'' information, not deleting it. If you can improve, then do so, but don't delete information and serve the role of a censor.  Go to [[Wikipedia]] to do that, where censors delete [[conservative]] information daily.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:43, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy, why do you even reply when you didn't read my post? Words fail me. Not even going to bother replying to your completely messed-up idea of improving the wiki (&amp;quot;You must not remove information added by me, no matter how little it has to do with the title&amp;quot;). Oh, and thanks for blocking me for cleaning up the mess caused by one of your High Quality Editors and accusing me of censorship. That sure motivates me! --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 17:57, 7 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;wore black entirely,&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ROUND UP THE NUNS!!!! I THINK SISTER MARY ELLEN IS PACKING HEAT!!!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about ninjas?  They wear all black, and we know they're bad.  Black = evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does this make pirates the agents of the almighty? They ARE the Ninja's sworn enemy, after all...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and Italian widows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
equating black with evil makes nuns and ministers evil ? thats not correct. Does lead one to wonder why black was selected especially as Nuns are the brides of christ , maybe white is a real challange laundry wise.  [[User:Markr|Markr]] 13:50, 21 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Young mass murderers==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the criteria?  Under 30?  Under 25?  And does a shooting in December qualify the murderer as anti-Christian? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 09:17, 8 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, does one poem someone wrote on a blog really count as a response for all liberals?  Or just one person? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 16:59, 8 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That was the official Virginia Tech poem.  It's probably somewhere on the Virginia Tech now, as it was after the tragedy.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:03, 8 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: What is the cutoff for &amp;quot;young&amp;quot;?  It's the same definition as for anything else.  Still in school, or out of school and less than, say, 21.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:03, 8 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::So then the VA Tech guy ''doesn't'' count then?  He was 23. [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 18:44, 8 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Dude, where's your logic?  Of course the [[Virginia Tech killer]] satisfies the definition of &amp;quot;young&amp;quot;.  Please read it again, and apply logic this time.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:47, 8 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::By your &amp;quot;logic&amp;quot;, [http://www.bsu.edu/news/article/0,1370,-1019-9169,00.html Constance Clark] would have been a &amp;quot;young mass murderer&amp;quot; if she had gone on a killing spree during her last university year (at age '''50'''). It somehow appears as if you're deliberately setting the goalposts to include all students while still pretending to only focus on young ones.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Do I regard a 23 old man as &amp;quot;young&amp;quot;? Not really. He's old enough to drink, drive and vote (just not in that order, please...), so calling him &amp;quot;young&amp;quot; is misleading. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 19:54, 8 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Growing Problem?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andy, you said on the Main Talk Page that, &amp;quot;''...this problem is growing: there were 4 mass murders...in 2007. How many will there be in 2008?''&amp;quot;  I'm afraid that's not accurate--there's been a fairly steady number of such incidents for at least a decade.  Googling &amp;quot;school shootings&amp;quot; will bring up various timelines going back years with much fodder for this article.  --[[User:RossC|RossC]] 14:23, 9 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's certainly been growing since the mid 90s, though. There was a wave of school shootings in 1997-1999, and copycat incidents have happened since. I just wrote a paper for my college class using statistics from 1995, and the writers then were arguing that school violence was relatively rare. And it certainly wasn't as much of a threat in the 1970s. It's growing, even though there may be variance year to year. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 14:24, 9 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, absolutely.  I wonder, too, how much of the sense of a &amp;quot;growing&amp;quot; problem is a function of the greater availability of news via the Internet, which started hitting its stride in the mid-90s.  A lot of the &amp;quot;lesser&amp;quot; pre-Net incidents might be buried out of public attention in local papers.--[[User:RossC|RossC]] 14:57, 9 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: No, I think it is a growing problem.  I've heard the claims that it was constant or even declining from the 1970s (Vietnam Era) through Columbine (1999), but I think that's outdated now.  4+ big incidents in one year (2007), totaling 50 dead and many injured, plus numerous arrests including some yesterday for foiled attempts, is more than any time in 30 years, I think.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:12, 9 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colorado killer ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Colorado killer does not meet the previous definition of young:  &amp;quot;Still in school, or out of school and less than, say, 21.&amp;quot;  Besides, he was a Christian-hater too.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:16, 10 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:A &amp;quot;very, very religious&amp;quot; Christian who hates Christians?  That's a new one on me.  The young man was clearly troubled, but I don't think you've shown that he hated Christians specifically, so much as he bore a grudge against the Missionary program from which he was ejected.  [[User:SSchultz|SSchultz]] 21:43, 10 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The point was that he was homeschooled. When a Public Schooler goes on a mass killing spree its '''solely''' because he went to a public school. When a homeschooler goes on a killing spree its '''most certainly not''' because of his flawless education and values. [[User:MarcusCicero|MarcusCicero]] 21:50, 10 December 2007 (EST) P.S- Just above, you also say the V Tech killer meets the definition of young. At least attempt to find logical consistency.&lt;br /&gt;
==VT==&lt;br /&gt;
Saying that the VT poem merely compared the tragedy to environmental harm is disingenuous as it is a gross understatement - more should be added to that. Regardless however, the poem had no political motivations - it was logic - unless someone here thinks that elephants DESERVE to be massacred for ivory. &amp;quot;Damn those darn elephants -they cheat in a poker games&amp;quot;--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 22:03, 10 December 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==Asa Coon==&lt;br /&gt;
Why is Asa Coon on here? Since when is suicide mass murder?--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 09:59, 16 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Attempted murder ... 4 times, followed by killing himself, which is also a type of murder.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:06, 16 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh ok - sorry I missed the number of injured - my mistake.--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 14:01, 16 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not a communist or anything but I really don't understand how you can class a suicide as mass murder. Surely if this is the case the list would be somewhat longer than eight entries. [[User:RedDog|RedDog]] 13:32, 16 February 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ummm...Mr. Schlafly? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aschlafly reverted my edit about the latest one concerning public schools, and....may I ask why? It seemed a logical followup to what was said. --[[User:JMarks|JMarks]] 23:01, 9 June 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reverts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why were Jeff Weise and Kip Kinkell removed? '''[[user:FernoKlump|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#000066&amp;quot; &amp;gt;FernoKlump&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]'''&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User:FernoKlump/petition|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#bd2433&amp;quot; &amp;gt;Look at this petition!]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:55, 16 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Marc Lépine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does Aschlafly keep trying to remove Marc Lepine?--[[User:DamianSuarez|DamianSuarez]] 10:54, 31 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: As I stated clearly, Marc had been in the workforce and was not a &amp;quot;young mass murderer.&amp;quot;  Also, the description for his views is misleading because it lacks hsi religious background.  See, e.g., [http://www.volokh.com/posts/1142399687.shtml Volokh Blog].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:17, 31 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He was also still in school and is younger than another entry on this list. His views were that he hated feminism. How is this misleading? If you don't believe me, read his suicide note.--[[User:DamianSuarez|DamianSuarez]] 11:38, 31 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Forgive the mistakes, I had 15 minutes to write this. See also Annex.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Would you note that if I commit suicide today 89-12-06 it is not for economic reasons (for I have waited until I exhausted all my financial means, even refusing jobs) but for political reasons. Because I have decided to send the feminists, who have always ruined my life, to their Maker. For seven years life has brought me no joy and being totally blasé, I have decided to put an end to those viragos.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried in my youth to enter the Forces as an officer cadet, which would have allowed me possibly to get into the arsenal and precede Lortie in a raid. They refused me because antisocial (sic). I therefore had to wait until this day to execute my plans. In between, I continued my studies in a haphazard way for they never really interested me, knowing in advance my fate. Which did not prevent me from obtaining very good marks despite my theory of not handing in work and the lack of studying before exams.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if the Mad Killer epithet will be attributed to me by the media, I consider myself a rational erudite that only the arrival of the Grim Reaper has forced to take extreme acts. For why persevere to exist if it is only to please the government. Being rather backward-looking by nature (except for science), the feminists have always enraged me. They want to keep the advantages of women (e.g. cheaper insurance, extended maternity leave preceded by a preventative leave, etc.) while seizing for themselves those of men.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus it is an obvious truth that if the Olympic Games removed the Men-Women distinction, there would be Women only in the graceful events. So the feminists are not fighting to remove that barrier. They are so opportunistic they neglect to profit from the knowledge accumulated by men through the ages. They always try to misrepresent them every time they can. Thus, the other day, I heard they were honoring the Canadian men and women who fought at the frontline during the world wars. How can you explain then that women were not authorized to go to the frontline??? Will we hear of Caesar's female legions and female galley slaves who of course took up 50% of the ranks of history, though they never existed. A real Casus Belli.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for this too brief letter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marc Lépine&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A list of names follows, with this note attached:--[[User:DamianSuarez|DamianSuarez]] 11:38, 31 July 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Nearly died today. The lack of time (because I started too late) has allowed these radical feminists to survive.&lt;br /&gt;
Alea Jacta Est.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rename?==&lt;br /&gt;
It seems to me this article needs to be renamed, without the &amp;quot;mass&amp;quot; in the title. Someone who murders one person (Kimveer Gill) or just himself (Asa Coon) can't really be said to be a &amp;quot;mass murderer&amp;quot; by any sense of the definition. Maybe &amp;quot;Attempted mass murderers&amp;quot; or just &amp;quot;murderers&amp;quot;, or some other adjective, for accuracy's sake. [[User:Fyezall|Fyezall]] 12:05, 26 August 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: perhaps just remove the few who didnt kill more than 1 ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Teach Marksmanship ! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My initial response to this article is probably going to seem bizarre but the death count and number wounded leads me to a professional condemnation of their marksmanship. If the intention was to kill rather than just create confusion then more injured than dead is inexcusable [[User:Markr|Markr]] 13:46, 21 November 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find that comment incredibly distasteful (not that i lost any friends in these attacks) but never the less, spare a thought for the parents and friends of the victims - would they like to hear that comment? (just my opinion - nothing personal) ---- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:PhilipV|PhilipV]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:PhilipV|'' I Support our Troops!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:58, 31 December 2008 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tim Kretschmer was &amp;quot;indicative of anti-Christianity&amp;quot;? ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the article it is said that Tim Kretschmer was &amp;quot;indicative of anti-Christianity&amp;quot;. I haven't found any evidence for that proposition. I also asked for a reference but my edit was reverted. I guess that he was kind of atheist, but some reference would be appreciated. I have been actively looking for it but I haven't found. So to someone who doesn't have such a presupposition, it can be quite hard to believe without a reference. So if someone has a reference, please add it. --[[User:Erkkimon|Erkkimon]] 18:21, 13 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I haven't found any evidence for that proposition&amp;quot; may mean you haven't yet opened your mind to it.  Atheists censor disclosure of the harm they cause, but that doesn't prevent the use of logic.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:22, 13 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You're trying to say that I haven't opened my mind to a proposition that atheists are behind these mass murders? I'm not sure if I understood right. But if I did understand right, I want to tell you that I'm quite sure that Kretschmer is also an atheist, because I have analyzed the school mass murders in Finland quite deeply. [http://translate.google.com/translate?prev=hp&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fapologetiikkawiki.org%2FKoulumassamurhat&amp;amp;sl=fi&amp;amp;tl=en This article] is mainly written by me and it should prove that I have opened my mind to the idea of mass murdering atheists. But you have to understand that we can't just guess. It doesn't prove anything. So I'll ask again. Is there any proof, that is not just a claim, that Tim Kretschmer was an atheist or naturalist or anti-semitist or anti-christian? --[[User:Erkkimon|Erkkimon]] 20:48, 13 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Wearing all black as a teenager is suggestive of anti-Christian beliefs.  Other examples in this entry illustrate that.  I welcome more evidence, but am not going to play dumb amid [[liberal denial]] by others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Your entry that you link above takes a small step towards the truth, yet ignores how deadly anti-Christian animus is, and how many self-described atheists suffer from it.  It's not a mental illness, but a belief system that results from being misled.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:42, 15 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suggested addition ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/18390116/detail.html] Derik A. Bonestroo, age 24.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Boulder Undersheriff Tom Shoemaker said, &amp;quot;The suspect ... fired a shot into the ceiling and yelled something about religion to the employees.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He (the suspect) barged in and wanted to know who was a Christian and who wasn't a Christian,&amp;quot; said Sheriff Joe Pelle.&amp;quot; [[User:CCalloway|CCalloway]] 14:14, 15 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: That's not even close to the level of the examples here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:34, 15 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He killed himself, a Catholic man, and a cat. That puts him above Asa Coon's kill count, and, depending on how you count the cat, above or equal to Kimveer Gill's kill count. [[User:CCalloway|CCalloway]] 14:59, 15 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: We don't count cats as humans, and you're ignoring the huge disparity in numbers wounded.  Also, a working 24-year-old who is no longer a student is not considered &amp;quot;young&amp;quot;.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:01, 15 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: I didn't suggest you counted cats as humans. Asa Coon wounded four, Bonestroo wounded a deputy and killed a Catholic man. That's not that far out of scale. You've got one example of similar age on the page, and one that is three years older. Why are you so opposed to this entry? [[User:CCalloway|CCalloway]] 15:07, 15 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Andy, just let him add that entry. He is factually correct, and your points contradict the rest of the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::: The suggested addition is not even close to the level of the current examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 07:54, 11 June 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possibly Unnecessary Column? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do we need a column with the liberal response? While I am all for outing the liberals for their ignorance and hypocrisy, it seems a bit extraneous alongside this particular article. I must say, though, this article is extremely well done! I especially like the &amp;quot;beliefs&amp;quot; column. Where else can I find that? Not anywhere in the mainstream media! It's good to see that we care about the truth. [[User:Krazor|Krazor]] 13:33, 4 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for pointing out the uniqueness of this entry.  But the extra column about &amp;quot;liberal response&amp;quot; is also informative, is it not?  It's an eye-opener as well.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 17:59, 4 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: I must say, it truly is. Thank you for taking the time to respond, Mr. Schlafly! May God give you peace! [[User:Krazor|Krazor]] 20:46, 6 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Asa Coon and Kimveer Gill ==&lt;br /&gt;
Most criminologists refer to mass murder as &amp;quot;the killing of four or more people in a single event&amp;quot; despite the fact that mass murder was their goal, they do not, in fact meet that criteria. I would suggest making a a seperate page on school shootings. Anyway, in the meanwhile, I am going to remove them from this list as they don't meet the criteria.--[[User:WilliamMc|WilliamMc]] 10:22, 18 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Don't do that, but do contribute your thoughts to our [[mass murder]] article. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:23, 18 December 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Page move==&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest moving the page to &amp;quot;Mass murderers&amp;quot;. Nothing about the age of the murderer has anything to do with their motivations. What matters is the environment that led to these terrible acts. By making &amp;quot;young&amp;quot; a requirement, we're either going to be misleading (like potentially inferring that Amy Bishops was a young woman) or incomplete (by omitting mass murderers like Amy Bishops because she wasn't young). Let's keep Conservapedia both accurate and complete and move the page. Thanks, [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 09:44, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps it would be best to merge with [[Mass murder]]? [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 09:47, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, the age is relevant, and it was their beliefs that DID matter very much.  And where did they get those beliefs at their young age?  You'll see that many in school and on the internet propagate such disastrous belief systems.  For every one who goes on a murderous rampage, there are hundreds or thousands who suffer mentally and emotionally to lesser extents ... due to their belief system.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 10:15, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Please, Mr. Schlafly, reconsider my request. Mistakenly implying that Bishop was young is misleading. Intentionally doing so is deceitful. You have stated that the criteria for young is nowhere near Bishop's 54 years of age. I know you will open your mind and make the right choice to improve the accuracy of Conservapedia. How about &amp;quot;publicly schooled mass murderers&amp;quot;? Thank you, [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 10:21, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Amy Bishop began killing at what, age 19?  If you like, you can add a footnote explaining that her rampage continued until age 54.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::More generally, your objection is nit-picky to the point of the absurd.  Diluting the entire entry is not the way to handle one caveat.  Please open your mind for the important information conveyed by the entry:  what kids are taught, and what they believe, ''does'' matter.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:07, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::A wise man once said, &amp;quot;I don't want to perpetuate this debate, but I don't want a lack of response to be misinterpreted&amp;quot;. Bishop was not 19 when she killed her brother. Bishop has not been convicted of murder for the killing of her brother and you know that you don't know if it was in fact murder. You have seemingly ignored yet endorsed my point that what people are taught is what matters, which is why the article would undoubtedly be more accurate if it were &amp;quot;publicly schooled mass murderers&amp;quot;. Can you deny this? You can name call it nitpicking, I call it what it is: factual accuracy. [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 11:19, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Jeff, are you debating this matter, in a liberal vs. conservative way, or are you trying to improve the article? If it's the latter, please stick to the point and avoid personal remarks such as, &amp;quot;Intentionally doing so is deceitful.&amp;quot; First, last, and only warning. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:03, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Good point, Ed.  Jeff, how old was Bishop when she killed her brother?  You say that &amp;quot;Bishop was not 19 when she killed her brother.&amp;quot;  Then you seem to deny that she killed him at all, which would be false.  Moreover, your suggested title of &amp;quot;public schooled mass murderers&amp;quot; would not be as precise for all the entries as &amp;quot;young mass murderers.&amp;quot;  Simply put, your suggestion introduces more inaccuracies then it would allegedly repair.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:20, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Mr. Schlafly, you are mistaken.  I did not deny that Bishop killed her brother. Please focus on these three simple questions: Do you deny that you are in no position to rule the killing of Seth Bishop a murder? Do you deny that Bishop is not a young woman? Do you deny that public schooling was more important than age in these murders? Thanks, [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 12:58, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Jeff, please first answer my simple question (and correct your misstatements, if necessary).  Was Bishop 19 when she killed her brother, or what age was she?  You expressly claimed she was not 19.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:16, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I am glad to answer your question. According to [http://newinfo.uah.edu/news/newspages/campusnews.php?id=172 bio] she was born 4/24/65. The killing occurred on 12/6/86 according to various sources. That would make her over 21. I await your answers to my questions. Thanks, [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 13:36, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I wonder why you emphasized that Bishop was not 19 when she killed her brother, if she was merely slightly older.  In response to your questions, &amp;quot;Do you deny that you are in no position to rule the killing of Seth Bishop a murder?&amp;quot;  I would not, and did not, attempt to &amp;quot;rule&amp;quot; on anything.  But Bishop's killing of her brother (and her conduct immediately afterward) is highly suggestive of murder.  Do you deny that?  Second question, &amp;quot;Do you deny that Bishop is not a young woman?&amp;quot;  Bishop first killed when she was a young woman, and then while still in her 20s was a suspect in the attempted murder of a professor who was critical of her.  No, she's not particularly young now.  Third question, &amp;quot;Do you deny that public schooling was more important than age in these murders?&amp;quot;  Public schooling is a big part of the problem.  But this entry focuses on a particular type of murder, and the common thread is more than the fact that most or all went to public school.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:15, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::This entry focuses on a particular type of murder, and the common thread is more than the fact that most or all were young. I wish we could agree on that and follow my original suggestion of moving the article to &amp;quot;mass murderers&amp;quot;. [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 15:21, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::No, because we don't include the many people who become mass murderers at an older age, such as Charles Manson.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::You protest too much.  Your real objection seems to be with the numerous examples, but the facts speak for themselves and we're here to tell the facts.  Wikipedia is better for those who want to conceal or deny facts.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:07, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::I have verified that every person on this list went to public school. Your claim that the change to &amp;quot;publicly schooled mass murderers&amp;quot; would cause more problems than it solved was a falsehood, as there is not even an exception, unlike the nebulous criterion of youth. Ironically, Manson also went to public school and committed mass murder in his thirties (unlike Bishop who was in her fifties). I'm here to set facts straight and you cannot deny that Amy Bishop did not commit mass murder as a young woman without loosing all credibility.  I sense your patience is wearing thin, so i shall try to improve other articles. [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 16:22, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jeff, if you feel there is evidence that young mass murderers in the US have been influenced by public schools, why not add that to the article? We can decide later on a page move, which is just an administrative function. Editorial integrity comes first, don't you think? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I completely agree, Ed. Unfortunately, after making changes after Andy and I agreed that we could not rule Seth Bishop's killing a murder and that the article was about a particular type of murder (not killing), the article was locked. [[User:JeffT|JeffT]] 16:47, 16 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Try taking a more cooperative or humble tone, and you'll find other writers more comfortable with your suggestions. Also, your claim, &amp;quot;Bishop was not 19 when she killed her brother,&amp;quot; is contradicted by the 2nd of the two articles I just now googled up. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Before Bishop, who was 19 at the time, could be booked the police chief back then called officers and told them to release her to her mother ... [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/13/amy-bishop-killed-brother_n_461512.html]&lt;br /&gt;
::Who was it who said that we are entitled to our opinions, but not to our own set of facts? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:52, 17 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Serial killer vs. mass murder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Encyclopaedia Britannica defines ''serial killing'' as the ''the unlawful homicide of at least two people, carried out in a series over a period of time. Although this definition was established in the United States, it has been largely accepted in Europe and elsewhere, but the crime is not formally recognized in any legal code, including that of the United States. '''Serial murder is distinguished from mass murder, in which several victims are murdered at the same time and place.''' ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Conservapedia, we read that [[Mass murder]] is ''the killing of large numbers of people. '' (The examples given in the article are all of genocide, perhaps an example of a terrorist attack should be added).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[serial killer]] is - according to Conservapedia ''a murderer who is responsible for multiple killings carried out on separate occasions. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On this very talk page, Aschlafly defines ''young'': ''What is the cutoff for &amp;quot;young&amp;quot;? It's the same definition as for anything else. Still in school, or out of school and less than, say, 21.--Aschlafly 17:03, 8 December 2007 (EST) ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The facts:&lt;br /&gt;
* When Amy Bishop killed her brother, she was no older than 21. &lt;br /&gt;
* When she killed he colleagues, she was 45 - and so, she wasn't young any longer (unless you claim that she is ''still in school'')&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two questions:&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jeffrey Dahmer]] was 18 when he killed his first victim. Does this make him a ''young mass murderer''? &lt;br /&gt;
Amy Bishop may have been a murderer age 19. But she became a ''mass murderer'' age 45. [[Adolf Hitler]] was 43 when he came to power in Germany. Is he a '' '''young mass murderer''' '', too?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, I think that A. Bishop is a mass murderer '''and''' a serial killer. She just isn't a ''young'' mass murderer. Generally, it doesn't make sense to speak about a ''young serial killer'' - at least not if his murders happened over an extended period of time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:PhilG|PhilG]] 13:08, 18 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Couple things.  First, in my opinion, this article should have a title reflective of the fact that these individuals had a personal ideology which was against God or against American values in some degree.  It should contain just those people regardless of age.&lt;br /&gt;
:Second, you have to put mass murderers in a proper context no matter who they are.  Amy Bishop was not a &amp;quot;serial killer&amp;quot;; prior to the UAH incident she is on record of killing one person, and it has been dismissed as an accident; we have to list it as an accident until proven otherwise.  John List killed off his entire family in 1971; he was pro-God and a devout Lutheran.  This keeps him out of this article but it still makes him every bit a mass murderer as the others.  The same with Charles Whitman, who killed 14 at the University of Texas in Austin; a brain tumor was found to have played a role in his case.&lt;br /&gt;
:Third, we have to know the differences between a mass murderer, a serial killer, and a spree killer.  A mass murderer kills multiple people at one location and at one time (James Huberty, Richard Speck, Columbine killers, etc).  A serial killer kills total strangers at differing locations, at different times, with a &amp;quot;cooling-off&amp;quot; period between murders, and usually with a personal gratification (John Gacy, Ted Bundy, Richard Ramirez).  A spree killer kills people at random in a disorganized manner during a short period of time (Andrew Cunanan, Beltway sniper, Virgina Tech killer).  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:28, 18 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::But at the moment, the article is titled ''young mass murderers''. For me, it seems to be more of an essay, as it has a clear intention, namely to show&lt;br /&gt;
:::'''young mass murderers are liberals.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::Due to the somewhat arcane selection of examples as to be seen on this talk page, it only makes the point&lt;br /&gt;
:::'''liberal mass murderers are liberals.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::There are a couple of ways to solve this:&lt;br /&gt;
::#keep the title and include all young mass murderers. In this case, at least the name of Amy Bishop has to be dropped&lt;br /&gt;
::#change the title according to Karajou's proposal to something like ''liberal mass murderers''.In this case, the question will arise whether there should be an article on ''unliberal mass murderers''.&lt;br /&gt;
::#follow JeffT's wishes and move the article to ''public schooled mass murderers''. As there are comparatively few home schoolers, this seems not to be a such a good option - it's like writing an article on ''Chinese murderers in Bejing''&lt;br /&gt;
::#name the article ''mass murderers'', make a short introduction that it isn't about [[genocide]] and [[terrorist attacks]] - and include ''all'' examples, even those mentioned by Karajou. Perhaps the entries could be color-coded according to their belief system?&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:PhilG|PhilG]] 11:17, 19 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PhilG, you can put the ages in a footnote for each, but it's too much trivia to obscure the text with.  If you want to suggest counterexamples who fit the criteria of the entry, feel free to do so here.  I doubt you'll find many.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:58, 19 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, I saw your note about Breivik being too old for the list, but I see Amy Bishop is 46. I'm not sure what the criteria are for inclusion? [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 11:44, 23 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::She allegedly committed her first murder at a much younger age.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:55, 23 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Breivik   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Breivik was 32, hardly &amp;quot;young&amp;quot;. Is there and age cut off or should we change the title of the page? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:41, 24 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Your point is excellent, but perhaps Breivik was immature for his age.  I doubt we'd include anyone older on this list.  To some extent, maturity matters more than age.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 18:41, 24 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I am 32 and don't consider myself young! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 18:54, 24 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cleaning or censoring? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Aschlafly, immediately after you had reverted my edit at [[Young mass murderers]], I tried to comment on this talk page. But I had to read ''The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Administrators, edit.'', and so I gave up after two hours of trying.&lt;br /&gt;
*How can it be more important to know that Breivik was '''possibly''' influenced by the esthetics of World-of-Warcraft II than that he was '''certainly''' driven by his hate for Muslims? &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 01:31, 29 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have taken the liberty of replacing the term &amp;quot;far-right&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;nationalistic&amp;quot; because it appears more appropriate for Breivic.  Placing his idiotic, thuggish brand of politics anywhere on the political scale is unfair and serves only as an emotive term or perhaps a wolf whistle.  It is analogous to calling the Nazi's left wing or right wing - they don't really fit anywhere on a political scale.  (And have I found an exception to  Godwin's Law?)  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 02:57, 29 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm okay with it. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:06, 29 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
@Aschlafly: ''Muslims were not victims of Breivik'' so what? His ideology and motivations are well known (unlike his preferences for video-game aesthetics, btw), and his hatred of Muslims played a big part in his pathological weltanschauung. Amy Bishop is described as ''a far-left political extremist'', though she didn't kill conservatives! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 12:06, 29 February 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Breivik, still and again==&lt;br /&gt;
Aschlafly, you complain that the ''liberal media'' ignore his video-gaming and show him as a fundamentalist Christian. But he invested far more time into his far-right fantasies than into video-gaming. You may think of him as the exception which proves the point, but he himself stresses his far-right positions - and his hate for Muslims.  Why do you want to suppress   this information? [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:27, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There's no evidence he was a Bible-thumping churchgoer, and his murderous rampage was similar to violent video game fantasies that played.  There's nothing &amp;quot;right-wing&amp;quot; about it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:30, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The information which you deleted stated:&lt;br /&gt;
:::''far-right ideologue, was driven by his hatred of Muslims, his belief that a &amp;quot;Muslim takeover&amp;quot; was imminent and what he saw as &amp;quot;cultural Marxism&amp;quot; and the failure of Norway's ruling liberal party to halt immigration, calling them traitors. http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/07/25/norway-suspect-wants-to-appear-in-court-in-uniform/?test=latestnews''&lt;br /&gt;
::There is nothing about him being a ''Bible-thumping churchgoer''&lt;br /&gt;
::The link confirms the statement. So why not keeping it in? Others are described as ''left wing'' or influenced by ''anti-Christian culture''. &lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:46, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's unclear what the term &amp;quot;far-right&amp;quot; means in this context. Is it supposed to mean &amp;quot;too conservative&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;so conservative as to be harmful&amp;quot;, or does it just mean totalitarian like Hitler and other fascists? Before you answer, bear in mind that leftists divide lump all their enemies together, so even people who believe in individual freedom are called &amp;quot;fascist&amp;quot; (meaning anti-freedom).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You may make any objection you like to the article, its wording or content, but please make such objections '''clear'''. Thanking you in advance ... --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:32, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:''far left/right'' or ''left/right'' are positions on the [[political spectrum]]. They are wildly used as a first-order approximation to describe someones political proclivities - indeed, they are used here at Conservapedia: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Leftist&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=343133 here] you can see how Aschlafly introduces the term ''far left'' into the article [[Leftist]]. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:54, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== May have rebelled against his parents' belief in Christianity and their opposition to violent video games.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there any evidence for that, or is that something that someone just pulled out of their rear end? [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 12:40, 22 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Boston Terrorists ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think they should be grouped as activities where carried out together. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 22:35, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Santa Monica ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.news.com.au/world-news/three-wounded-in-santa-monica-college-school-shooting/story-fndir2ev-1226660445965 John Zawahiri] should be added to the list. [[User:JAnderson|JAnderson]] 08:31, 10 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberals ignore his drug use and video game playing habits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andy, what do you know about Roof's video game playing habits?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main page - and this page, too - are ignoring that a young white man shot nine African-Americans while proclaiming &amp;quot;I have to do it. You rape our women and you're taking over our country. And you have to go&amp;quot;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3129109/South-Carolina-church-shooter-captured.html] It seems that he wasn't talking about the video-game community - or his facebook-&amp;quot;friends&amp;quot;....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:53, 18 June 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I think we should focus, not on video games, but on his history of drug abuse. I know I'm new, but damn. He is a druggie. This was bound to happen. Like I said, I'm new, so any thoughts are helpful. [[User:Starshipearth|Starshipearth]] 16:47, 18 June 2015 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Adam Lanza Attended a Christian School==&lt;br /&gt;
Guy: Once again you are removing referenced factual information from my edits. Is the thought of a mass murderer attending a Christian school too much for your sensibilities? [https://sandyhooklighthouse.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/adam-lanzas-educational-history/]&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 21:39, 28 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I removed one reference and added three more. You made it sound like he was some religious Christian conservative by your edits, something which I see no evidence for (being in a Catholic school does not necessarily make one that -- and I'm not a Roman Catholic, so this fact does not really concern me even if true). True, your source says he was outside the public school system longer than the other sources say, but still, most of his life was spent inside the public school system, especially the early part of his life, before 8th grade. Even after that, his parents still cooperated with the public school in their kid's education. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:57, 28 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::You make me laugh. Ha ha. You removed the fact this kid attended a Christian school. Please show where I even implied he was ‘some religious Christian conservative’. You can’t. It is a fact a mass murderer attended a Christian school for a while. I’m adding factual information to this article while you are deceiving the readers with your deceptive edits.--[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 22:08, 28 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fine, add it back if you wish, '''without''' removing the other info/refs I added. If you want to last a while here, don't engage in personal attacks. Despite you not liking my edits, you did not refute my points in my previous comment. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:28, 28 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Young_mass_murderers&amp;amp;curid=53342&amp;amp;diff=1364144&amp;amp;oldid=1364116 Good edit], though it still does not make clear the fact that he was public schooled much longer than in a Catholic school. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:54, 28 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::My first edit specifically stated he was enrolled in a Christian school for a short time but you removed it. Would you like me to revert it to my first edit so I can comply with your most recent criticism? I don’t like your edits because you have a history of ruining some of the articles I change. I had nothing to refute in your first comment because you made an unfounded accusation. --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 22:59, 28 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I changed it. I don't really like your edits either, as they seem to make CP's articles more favorable to left-of-center points of view. Editors are required to avoid such edits. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:04, 28 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Your last edit seems awkward, ‘He was and public-schooled…’ --[[User:GinnyS|GinnyS]] ([[User talk:GinnyS|talk]]) 23:14, 28 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::It was a typo. Thanks for catching it, but SamHB changed it. I support his edits. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:21, 28 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
And I support what both of you are doing.  We just need to look at the facts and follow them wherever they lead, whether that goes against what may be considered &amp;quot;Conservapedia orthodoxy&amp;quot; or not.  He went (briefly) to Catholic school, and he was a mass murderer.  One has to accept that that happened.  We can't censor that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For what it's worth, in my recent round of edits, I completely ignored any considerations of &amp;quot;Conservative orthodoxy&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Liberal orthodoxy&amp;quot;.  I just read the referenced articles.  Believe it or not, I'm not interested in putting &amp;quot;spin&amp;quot; on what I write.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, and I found some references in the mass media to the role of violent video games.  But any uproar over this didn't go very far.  I think that's because the first amendment makes it very problematical to try to regulate video games.  That may not be a good policy, but that isn't for me to say.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 00:04, 29 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Inconsistency ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This page says regarding Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold &amp;quot;Atheistic, singled out a girl to kill her for believing in God.&amp;quot;, yet on the page of columbine itself, it says: &amp;quot;This much-publicized conversation, often attributed to Bernall, has caused serious debate and controversy, due to rumor and speculation setting in years before concrete evidence was released to the public&amp;quot;. This is an inconsistency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Should we be showing the pictures of the killers? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
why give more fame to the murderers then we need to? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 21:39, 11 July 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Young_mass_murderers&amp;diff=1432799</id>
		<title>Young mass murderers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Young_mass_murderers&amp;diff=1432799"/>
		<updated>2018-07-12T01:28:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Recent increases in tragic mass murders perpetrated by young individuals have prompted questions about their rationale for doing so.  Below is evidence that their motives have been overwhelmingly [[atheism|atheistic]] or [[liberal]], or driven by hatred of [[God]].  Virtually all of these killers are the product of [[public schools]] and most were big [[video game]] players.  Many of these murders fit the observation by the forensic psychiatrist Dr. Michael Welner about the Connecticut massacre: &amp;quot;This was a crime that was more than a mass shooting. He killed these people like an arcade game.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/local/northern_suburbs&amp;amp;id=8923831] Dr. Michael Welner appeared on the ''View''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many were [[marijuana]] users also.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Name(s)&lt;br /&gt;
!Education&lt;br /&gt;
!Killed&lt;br /&gt;
!Wounded&lt;br /&gt;
!Beliefs&lt;br /&gt;
![[Liberal]] response&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|Dimitrios Pagourtzis&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|at least 13&lt;br /&gt;
|An [[atheist]], he wore a black trench coat on hot days, including the day of his killings; he was a [[Facebook]] user who &amp;quot;posted images of a t-shirt with 'Born to Kill' written across it,&amp;quot; and also posted images that might be interpreted as [[Satan]]ic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://coed.com/2018/05/18/who-is-dimitrios-pagourtzis-santa-fe-shooter-information/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal]] [[New York]] governor Andrew Cuomo publishes an open letter to President [[Donald Trump]] urging him to &amp;quot;do something,&amp;quot; even though schools are a local, not federal, issue.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/388351-cuomo-pens-open-letter-to-trump-after-texas-shooting-you-were-elected-to&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|Nikolas de Jesus Cruz&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|17&lt;br /&gt;
|at least 14&lt;br /&gt;
|Fond of posting vile things on [[social media]].&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Lamestream media]] prominently mention that he was formerly in Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps prior to expulsion.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|15-year-old, not yet identified publicly&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2 teenagers&lt;br /&gt;
|at least 18&lt;br /&gt;
|Joined an [[atheist]] group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2018/january/kentucky-shooter-joined-atheist-group-but-couldnt-stop-these-students-from-praying&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Lamestream media]] conceal how the killer was an [[atheist]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|Ali David Sonboly&lt;br /&gt;
|not [[homeschooling|homeschooled]]; homeschooling is illegal in [[Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
|9, mostly young&lt;br /&gt;
|27 others injured&lt;br /&gt;
|Obsessed with playing violent [[video games]] and reportedly used a fake [[Facebook]] account to lure young victims.&lt;br /&gt;
|Many [[liberal media]] reports completely omit the connection with [[video games]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/23/europe/germany-munich-shooting/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
| Micah Xavier Johnson&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|5 police officers&lt;br /&gt;
|7 others injured&lt;br /&gt;
|He was an active [[Facebook]] user who ranted against &amp;quot;whites&amp;quot; in a posting less than a week before his mass murders.&lt;br /&gt;
|Downplays a possible psychological effect of the murderer's devotion to [[Facebook]], which included participating in a group there having a pro-African American race-based ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Omar Mateen]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:Omar_Mateen.jpg|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|49 at a night-club in Orlando, Florida&lt;br /&gt;
|53&lt;br /&gt;
|A [[Facebook]] user who had to be blocked by a woman to whom he sent many unsettling messages, Mateen was a [[Muslim]] who had reportedly celebrated the [[9/11]] attack in front of classmates at the time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/apnewsbreak-woman-says-nightclub-shooter-stalked-her/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He pledged allegiance to [[ISIS]] while committing his mass murder.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.yahoo.com/news/know-omar-mateen-suspected-orlando-000000893.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Downplay the terrorist motive and background of the killer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/06/30/wikipedia-removes-orlando-shooting-islamist-terror-attack-list/|title=Wikipedia Removes Orlando Shooting From ‘Islamist Terror Attack’ List|work=breitbart.com|date=June 30, 2016|accessdate=July 8, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Christopher Harper-Mercer]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]] (community college)&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|9&lt;br /&gt;
|The murderer acted &amp;quot;like he was playing a video game,&amp;quot; according to a victim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/US/oregon-college-shooting-survivor-describes-gunman-acting-playing/story?id=34542192&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The murderer declared that he will be &amp;quot;welcomed in [[Hell]] and embraced by the [[devil]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/oregon-college-shooting/oregon-shooting-umpqua-gunman-chris-harper-mercer-what-we-know-n437351&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He was a [[Nazi]] enthusiast of [[British]] origin, self-described [[Nones|&amp;quot;not religious&amp;quot;]] who disliked &amp;quot;organized religion.&amp;quot; The murderer was an anti-Christian and he shot victims in the head if they were [[Christian]] and shot individuals in the leg if they were non-Christian.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberals]] exploited the grief to push for [[gun control]], and at least one family of a wounded victim declined [[Obama]]'s invitation to meet: &amp;quot;On principle, I find that I am in disagreement with his policies on gun control, and therefore, we will not be attending the visit,&amp;quot; said Stacy Bolan, whose daughter was shot and wounded during the rampage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obama-meets-oregon-school-shooting-victims-families/story?id=34378256&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|5 soldiers in Tennessee&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|A jihadist who used drugs.  He was reportedly fired from a job at a nuclear plant because he failed a drug test.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/07/18/sailor-in-chattanooga-shooting-has-died-death-toll-now-5/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was also &amp;quot;pulled over April 20 for driving erratically. Officers said he smelled of [[alcohol]] and [[marijuana]], had slurred or mumbled speech and had a 'white powdery substance' under his nose and around his nostrils.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal denial]] about the obvious motive, about failed immigration policy that allowed him into the [[United States]], and about the drug use that is common to many of these horrific crimes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-sailor-injured-in-chattanooga-shooting-dies-20150718-story.html#page=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|Dylann Storm Roof&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]] dropout&lt;br /&gt;
|9 as they participated in [[Bible]] study in a Charleston church&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Racism]]; Spent much of his time playing [[video games]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wsj.com/articles/charleston-church-shooting-suspect-dylann-roof-became-a-loner-in-recent-years-1434644808&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Also involved in drug use&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://kfor.com/2015/06/18/dylann-storm-roof-arrested-in-north-carolina-according-to-report/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Facebook]].  &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberals]] ignore his drug use and [[video game]] playing habits.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|Elliot Rodger&lt;br /&gt;
|a public college&lt;br /&gt;
|7 young men and women killed, including himself&lt;br /&gt;
|13&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Racism]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/30/elliot-rodger-puahate-forever-alone-reddit-forums 'PUAhate' and 'ForeverAlone': inside Elliot Rodger's online life]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; got hooked on violent video games at a young age, and by his own admission hid himself &amp;quot;away in the online World of Warcraft, a place where [he] felt comfortable and secure.&amp;quot;  He did not realize &amp;quot;the severity of how far [he] had fallen&amp;quot; due to the violent video games.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/05/24/six-absolutely-stunning-details-from-suspected-santa-barbara-shooters-141-page-manifesto/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Not a word by [[liberals]] or [[Wikipedia®]] admitting the mass murderer was influenced by violent video games, even though the murderer himself admitted it.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]] education (19-year-old Dzhokhar)&lt;br /&gt;
|4 plus Tamerlan himself, who was apparently killed when Dzhokhar drove a car over him&lt;br /&gt;
|more than 170 injured, many horrifically with limbs blown off&lt;br /&gt;
|Dzhohkar was allegedly a frequent abuser of [[Marijuana]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/04/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-dealing-drugs/64529/ &amp;quot;College Weed Dealer&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Tamerlan was reportedly a &amp;quot;very religious&amp;quot; [[Muslim]], who had even given up smoking and drinking based on his religious views,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/19/tamerlan-tsarnaev-american-life-of-dead-boston-bomb-suspect&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but was reportedly estranged from his family owing to his extremist views.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal denial]] that Dzhohkar was almost certainly on drugs immediately before, during and/or after the bombing.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|Nehemiah Griego&lt;br /&gt;
|Reportedly not registered with the local school district.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.capitalbay.com/latest-news/299812-nehemiah-griego-albuquerque-pastor-s-son-15-shoots-family-dead-with-assault-rifle.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|5, including mom, dad, and little children in his family&lt;br /&gt;
|None&lt;br /&gt;
|Loved to play violent video games, and even enjoyed talking about them to the crime investigators.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/22/new-mexico-teen-accused-in-killing-family-involved-heavily-with-violent-video/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He initially planned to kill more people in a public place, but instead visited a church then turned himself in.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;USAToday21Jan2013&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/21/new-mexico-shooting-victims/1850677/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|The liberal media initially and falsely implied he did not play video games.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/n-m-teen-accused-killing-family-quiet-article-1.1243888&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Adam Lanza&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-57559316-504083/connecticut-school-shooting-suspected-shooter-now-idd-as-adam-lanza-older-brother-ryan-questioned-by-cops/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|His educational history was complex and troubled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sandyhooklighthouse.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/adam-lanzas-educational-history/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He attended [[public school]] until about 8th grade, when his behavior became so alarming that his mother, after a brief period in Catholic school, began a mixture of home-schooling and some work in the public school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kreider, Randy (December 15, 2012). [http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/adam-lanzas-mom-pulled-school-relative/story?id=17985433 Adam Lanza's Mom Pulled Him Out of School: Relative]. ''ABC News''. Retrieved July 28, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|27&amp;amp;mdash;the murderer, his mother, 6 adult school staff, and 20 children&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|He was fascinated with guns, though his mother gave him instruction in their proper use, hoping this would teach him responsibility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9751240/Connecticut-school-shooting-Adam-Lanzas-mother-thought-guns-would-teach-him-responsibility.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In later years his &amp;quot;existence ... largely involved playing violent computer video games in a bedroom,&amp;quot; and he &amp;quot;spent hours playing violent video games such as Call Of Duty in a windowless bunker&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9752141/Connecticut-school-massacre-Adam-Lanza-spent-hours-playing-Call-Of-Duty.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he was &amp;quot;goth&amp;quot; and wore a mask; after the massacre, officers found evidence that he had been playing &amp;quot;graphically violent&amp;quot; video games recently;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.courant.com/2012-12-15/news/hc-adam-lanza-newtown-shooting-1216-20121215_1_law-officers-asperger-semiautomatic-rifle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Dynasty Warriors&amp;quot; had been one of his favorites in the past&lt;br /&gt;
|The usual call for stricter gun control, but not a lot of calls for control of violent video games.  Some commentators suggested that homeschooling was to blame, and that there should be testing for antisocial/dangerous behavior for homeschooled students as well as for public-school students.  But he was obviously a very troubled person.  Society simply does not have the resources to identify dangerous people, homeschooled or otherwise, and it isn't known whether such a program would be effective.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cummings, Quinn (October 31, 2014). [http://time.com/3551600/sandy-hook-advisory-commission-homeschooling/ Homeschooled Kids Shouldn't Be Scapegoats for Sandy Hook]. ''Time''. Retrieved July 28, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Unruh, Bob (September 26, 2014). [http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/sandy-hook-commission-blames-homeschooling/ Sandy Hook Commission Blames Homeschooling]. ''WND''. Retrieved July 28, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Such a policy would also likely violate the [[Fourth amendment]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Jacob Tyler Roberts&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]] and a [[Facebook]] user&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://abcnews.go.com/US/oregon-mall-gunman-wanted-kill-people/story?id=17941415#.UMkG84PHegI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|2, including the murderer&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|Played video games (his rampage enacted a scene in ''Grand Theft Auto''); he dressed in black for the murders as other young mass murderers have, and donned a hockey mask perhaps inspired by [[Hollywood]] horror films&lt;br /&gt;
|A day later, authorities and the [[liberal media]] still have disclosed almost nothing about the murderer; instead, [[liberals]] almost immediately demanded more [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|[[James Eagan Holmes‎|James Holmes]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[File:James Eagan Holmes.jpg|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|PhD student at [[University of Colorado]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/20/colorado-shooting-james-holmes_n_1688996.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|12&lt;br /&gt;
|58&lt;br /&gt;
|Like other young mass murderers, dressed in all-black for the killings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/20/us/colorado-theater-suspect-profile/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was obsessed with playing [[video games]] like &amp;quot;World of Warcraft&amp;quot; (see Breivik below);&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tmz.com/2012/07/20/james-holmes-shooter-guitar-hero-dark-knight/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for the murderous rampage, he dyed his hair bright red presumably to imitate the Joker (Batman's nemesis).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tmz.com/2012/07/20/james-holmes-colorado-shooting-joker/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://mobile.twitter.com/#!/ABC/status/226365875245178880&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ABC News]] falsely suggests tie to [[Tea Party]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/27/tea-party-frequent-suspect-for-media/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberals call for gun control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/367020/20120726/james-holmes-court-colorado-shooting-barack-obama.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;T.J. Lane&amp;quot; of the Cleveland area&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57386938/suspect-in-ohio-school-shooting-arrives-at-court/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|Posted a chilling rant on [[Facebook]] about two months before his murderous rampage.&lt;br /&gt;
|Insists he was a victim of bullying, which several students who knew him denied.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/national/two-reported-dead-three-injured-in-ohio-school-shooting-20120228&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Anders Behring Breivik]][[File:Sketch of Breivik.png|100px]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wect.com/story/15134203/gunmans-background-puzzles-police-in-norway&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|public school&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;He was 32 years old at the time of the crime.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|68 shot dead at a youth camp of the Norwegian Labor party, another 8 in a bombing of government buildings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.wsj.com/emergingeurope/2011/07/25/breivik-bought-chemicals-in-poland-security-agency-says/?mod=google_news_blog&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|Many continued to be missing after the killing rampage.&lt;br /&gt;
|According to the judgement rendered against him, he liked playing violent [[video games]] and saw himself as &amp;quot;ultra-nationalist&amp;quot; who fought against [[Muslim]] immigration and [[Marxist]] subversion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://da.scribd.com/doc/103815386/LOVDATA-DOM-toslo-2011-188627-24 Court's judgment in the case against Anders Behring Breivik], Oslo, 24 Aug 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He spent considerable time editing [[Wikipedia]].&lt;br /&gt;
|A typical headline in the [[liberal]] media blames [[fundamentalist]] [[Christianity]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Jared Lee Loughner&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Suspected gunman as identified in the media.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[File:Loughner173005--300x300.jpg|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[public high school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|at least 17, including a Congresswoman&lt;br /&gt;
|a [[nihilist]]; &amp;quot;Left wing, quite liberal ... a political radical&amp;quot; and he declared that ''[[The Communist Manifesto]]'', ''[[Animal Farm]]'' and ''[[Mein Kampf]]'' are among his favorite books&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40980334/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.zerohedge.com/article/jared-lee-laughners-youtube-site-reveals-clues-about-killer-lists-mein-kampf-and-communist-m&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|It's [[Sarah Palin]]'s fault because nearly one year earlier she had posted targets on 20 congressional districts for Republican wins, and this massacre (by a liberal) occurred in one of those districts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.forbes.com/carolinehoward/2011/01/08/gabrielle-giffords-shooting-and-sarah-palins-conscience/ &amp;quot;Gabrielle Giffords' Shooting And Sarah Palin's Conscience.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Amy Bishop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[professor values|professor]], and daughter of a professor&lt;br /&gt;
|3, + many reporters believe brother in 1986 &lt;br /&gt;
|3, was also a suspect in attempted murder in 1993&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;was a far-left political extremist who was 'obsessed' with President Obama to the point of being off-putting.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20100215oddball_protrait_emerges_suspects_family_pals_offer_clues/srvc=home&amp;amp;position=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals liked her: she &amp;quot;was admired by her peers and loved by her students&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;was a super intelligent person.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view/20100214everybody_described_her_as_gentle/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Tim Kretschmer&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Germany]] [[public school]]&lt;br /&gt;
|15 + himself&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reports were that the police did not mortally wound him. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1161139/Are-dead-Police-gun-ex-student-17-targeted-women-German-school-massacre.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|several others&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Europe calls for more [[gun control]]; [[liberal]] media promotes falsehood: &amp;quot;We'll never know why they kill.&amp;quot;[http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/03/12/greene.shootings/]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Stephen Kazmierczak&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Northern Illinois University]]&lt;br /&gt;
|5 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|16&lt;br /&gt;
|Fan of [[Nietzsche]]'s &amp;quot;The Antichrist,&amp;quot; obsessed with self-injury, was a &amp;quot;cutter&amp;quot; in [[public high school]], wore all black to carry out his massacre, and was still a [[public school]] student at age 27&lt;br /&gt;
|Feigned shock at the fact that the gunman didn't &amp;quot;fit&amp;quot; the typical mold of a killer.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert Hawkins&lt;br /&gt;
|Papillion-La Vista public high school&lt;br /&gt;
|8 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Targeted [[Christmas]] shoppers; wore black; &amp;quot;I can't take this meaningless existence anymore&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/bal-te.omaha08dec08,0,6053469.story Baltimore Sun]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Told a therapist that &amp;quot;he is not sure if there is a [[God]] or life after death and that when he dies, he'll probably go to hell.&amp;quot; Told social workers he was [[Satan]]ic and acknowledged that he often acted before thinking of the consequences.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,318506,00.html Mall Gunman Admitted He was Satanic, Attempted Suicide], [[Associated Press]], [[Fox News Channel]], December 27, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Avoided suggesting [[gun control]] lest [[Democrats]] lose [[West Virginia]] and [[Wisconsin]] in [[2008 presidential election]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|Pekka-Eric Auvinen&lt;br /&gt;
|Jokela High School public high school (Finland)&lt;br /&gt;
|8 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|About 12&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Atheist]], Supremacist(&amp;quot;I, as a natural selector, will eliminate all who I see unfit.&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Finland]] already had [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Seung-Hui Cho]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Image:Cho.jpg|100px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Westfield public high school (VA), then Virginia Tech public university&lt;br /&gt;
|32 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Ismail Ax&amp;quot; suggested [[Muslim]] beliefs, felt &amp;quot;[[Jesus]] was crucifying me.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Poem comparing it to environmental harm&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Virginia Tech, ''Transcript of Nikki Giovanni's Convocation address'', Delivered April 17, 2007 [http://www.vt.edu/remember/archive/giovanni_transcript.html] ''We are Virginia Tech./We are sad today, and we will be sad for quite a while. We are not moving on, we are embracing our mourning./We are Virginia Tech./We are strong enough to stand tall tearlessly, we are brave enough to bend to cry, and we are sad enough to know that we must laugh again./We are Virginia Tech./We do not understand this tragedy. We know we did nothing to deserve it, but neither does a child in Africa dying of AIDS, neither do the invisible children walking the night away to avoid being captured by the rogue army, neither does the baby elephant watching his community being devastated for ivory, neither does the Mexican child looking for fresh water, neither does the Appalachian infant killed in the middle of the night in his crib in the home his father built with his own hands being run over by a boulder because the land was destabilized. No one deserves a tragedy./We are Virginia Tech./The Hokie Nation embraces our own and reaches out with open heart and hands to those who offer their hearts and minds. We are strong, and brave, and innocent, and unafraid. We are better than we think and not quite what we want to be. We are alive to the imaginations and the possibilities. We will continue to invent the future through our blood and tears and through all our sadness./We are the Hokies./We will prevail./We will prevail./We will prevail./We are Virginia Tech.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americaabroad.tpmcafe.com/blog/oldengoldendecoy/2007/apr/17/nikki_giovanni_we_are_virginia_tech]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|Asa Coon&lt;br /&gt;
|SuccessTech public school Academy (Cleveland)&lt;br /&gt;
|Himself&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|Said he didn't believe in [[God]] and didn't respect [[God]], killed after classmate disagreed; wore black&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cleveland.com/news/plaindealer/index.ssf?/base/cuyahoga/1192092117230670.xml&amp;amp;coll=2]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Under-publicized because of his anti-[[God]] statements&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Kimveer Gill]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Rosemere High School (Québec)&lt;br /&gt;
|1 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|20&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;I hate [[God]]&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;I hate religious zealots&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Canada]] already has [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert Steinhäuser&lt;br /&gt;
|Erfurt public school (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
|16 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|Wore black entirely, literally from head to toe; stopped only when a teacher pulled off his black mask&lt;br /&gt;
|[[German]] [[gun control]] already strict, demands for limitations on computer games&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Columbine public high school]] (CO)&lt;br /&gt;
|13 + themselves&lt;br /&gt;
|23&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Atheistic]], singled out a girl to kill her for believing in [[God]].&lt;br /&gt;
|Demand [[gun control]], causing [[Al Gore]] to lose [[West Virginia]], [[Tennessee]] and [[Arkansas]] in 2000 presidential election&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|Mitchell Johnson and Andrew Golden&lt;br /&gt;
|Westside Middle School&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|10&lt;br /&gt;
|Mitchell Johnson, the older of the two, was obsessed with rap lyrics like &amp;quot;coming to school and killing all the kids.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1998/06/16/entertainment/main11983.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals blame the guns rather than the killer's obsession with rap music.  Johnson is released at age 21 but is later arrested for new crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Carneal&lt;br /&gt;
|Heath public high school (KY)&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|Murdered girls as they prayed in a [[prayer]] group; shooting had tell-tale signs it was incited/trained by video games: Carneal never moved his feet during his shootings, and never fired far to the left or right, but instead fired only once at each target that appeared, just as a player of video games maximizes his game score by shooting only once at each victim, in order to hit as many targets as possible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lt. Col. Dave Grossman and Gloria DeGaetano, Stop Teaching Our Kids To Kill 75 (1999).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Under-publicized due to anti-[[Christian]] nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|Marc Lépine, at the École Polytechnique de Montréal&lt;br /&gt;
||Collège d'enseignement général et professionnel, (''College of General and Vocational Education'')&lt;br /&gt;
|14 + himself&lt;br /&gt;
|14&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Montreal Coroners Report of the École Polytechnique de Montréal massacre [http://www.diarmani.com/Montreal_Coroners_Report.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|His religious views were unpublicized but he was raised in a home with an immigrant Muslim father who was allegedly highly critical of the [[feminist]] view of women's role in society; Marc's mother was an ex-nun; and his sister had allegedly committed suicide&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.volokh.com/posts/1142399687.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Allegedly his suicide note reflected anger towards feminists, See [http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_5897.aspx CityNews Rewind: The Montreal Massacre, December 6, 2006]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Ignore the personal background of the killer and instead use the massacre to push for stricter [[gun control]] and more laws concerning violence against women, and establish in [[Canada]] a National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence Against Women.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mass shootings prevented by armed citizens]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of atheist shooters and serial killers]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Crime]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Threats]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432792</id>
		<title>Compulsory vaccination</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432792"/>
		<updated>2018-07-11T23:58:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Compulsory vaccination''' exists as a condition of admission to [[public school]] in 33 states of the [[United States]]. Vaccine manufacturers lobby for these laws to maximize revenue on their products.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483914/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New vaccines have been required of schoolchildren for diseases that do not spread in school([[HPV]]) or are rarely dangerous to schoolchildren, such as [[chickenpox]], and [[flu]]. Vaccination has also been required for [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], [[tetanus]] [[measles]], [[mumps]],  [[rubella]], [[hib]], [[meningococcal disease]], [[pneumococcal disease]], [[hepatitis B]] and [[hepatitis A]].{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All states have a [[religious]] exemption from compulsory vaccination except [[California]], [[Mississippi]] and [[West Virginia]]. Also, 17 states have a philosophical exemption (exemption for anyone who does not want to vaccinate)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social Services]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Government]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vaccines]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432791</id>
		<title>Compulsory vaccination</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432791"/>
		<updated>2018-07-11T23:58:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: more cpmpleat list&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Compulsory vaccination''' exists as a condition of admission to [[public school]] in 33 states of the [[United States]]. Vaccine manufacturers lobby for these laws to maximize revenue on their products.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483914/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New vaccines have been required of schoolchildren for diseases that do not spread in school([[HPV]]) or are rarely dangerous to schoolchildren, such as [[chickenpox]], and [[flu]]. Vaccination has also been required for [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], [[tetanus]] [[measles]], [[mumps]],  [[rubella]], [[hib]], [[Meningococcal disease]], [[pneumococcal disease]], [[hepatitis B]] and [[hepatitis A]].{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All states have a [[religious]] exemption from compulsory vaccination except [[California]], [[Mississippi]] and [[West Virginia]]. Also, 17 states have a philosophical exemption (exemption for anyone who does not want to vaccinate)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social Services]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Government]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vaccines]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432790</id>
		<title>Compulsory vaccination</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432790"/>
		<updated>2018-07-11T23:52:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: 17 allow any exeptions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Compulsory vaccination''' exists as a condition of admission to [[public school]] in 33 states of the [[United States]]. Vaccine manufacturers lobby for these laws to maximize revenue on their products.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483914/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New vaccines are being required of schoolchildren for numerous diseases that most will never be exposed to, such as [[Hepatitis B]], and diseases that are not dangerous to schoolchildren, such as [[chickenpox]].  Compulsory vaccination has also been required for [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], [[measles]], [[mumps]], and [[rubella]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All states have a [[religious]] exemption from compulsory vaccination except [[California]], [[Mississippi]] and [[West Virginia]]. Also, 17 states have a philosophical exemption (exemption for anyone who does not want to vaccinate)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social Services]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Government]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vaccines]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432789</id>
		<title>Compulsory vaccination</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432789"/>
		<updated>2018-07-11T23:32:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Compulsory vaccination''' exists as a condition of admission to [[public school]] in all 50 states of the [[United States]]. Vaccine manufacturers lobby for these laws to maximize revenue on their products.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483914/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New vaccines are being required of schoolchildren for numerous diseases that most will never be exposed to, such as [[Hepatitis B]], and diseases that are not dangerous to schoolchildren, such as [[chickenpox]].  Compulsory vaccination has also been required for [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], [[measles]], [[mumps]], and [[rubella]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All states have a [[religious]] exemption from compulsory vaccination except [[California]], [[Mississippi]] and [[West Virginia]]. Also, 17 states have a philosophical exemption (exemption for anyone who does not want to vaccinate)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social Services]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Government]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vaccines]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432788</id>
		<title>Compulsory vaccination</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432788"/>
		<updated>2018-07-11T23:29:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: remove unsourced and vauge sentence, it is generally agreed that sanitation and vaccination were both critical&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Compulsory vaccination''' exists in all 50 states of the [[United States]], particularly as a condition of admission to [[public school]].  Vaccine manufacturers lobby for these laws to maximize revenue on their products.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483914/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New vaccines are being required of schoolchildren for numerous diseases that most will never be exposed to, such as [[Hepatitis B]], and diseases that are not dangerous to schoolchildren, such as [[chickenpox]].  Compulsory vaccination has also been required for [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], [[measles]], [[mumps]], and [[rubella]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All states have a [[religious]] exemption from compulsory vaccination except [[California]], [[Mississippi]] and [[West Virginia]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social Services]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Government]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vaccines]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432787</id>
		<title>Compulsory vaccination</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432787"/>
		<updated>2018-07-11T23:26:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: add citation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Compulsory vaccination''' exists in all 50 states of the [[United States]], particularly as a condition of admission to [[public school]].  Vaccine manufacturers lobby for these laws to maximize revenue on their products.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3483914/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While proponents of vaccination argue that it helped eradicate [[smallpox]] and [[polio]], others cite improved hygiene as significant factors.  Regardless, new vaccines are being required of schoolchildren for numerous diseases that most will never be exposed to, such as [[Hepatitis B]], and diseases that are not dangerous to schoolchildren, such as [[chickenpox]].  Compulsory vaccination has also been required for [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], [[measles]], [[mumps]], and [[rubella]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All states have a [[religious]] exemption from compulsory vaccination except [[California]], [[Mississippi]] and [[West Virginia]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social Services]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Government]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vaccines]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432786</id>
		<title>Compulsory vaccination</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Compulsory_vaccination&amp;diff=1432786"/>
		<updated>2018-07-11T23:21:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: add california now that SB 277 passes, add citation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Compulsory vaccination''' exists in all 50 states of the [[United States]], particularly as a condition of admission to [[public school]].  Vaccine manufacturers lobby for these laws to maximize revenue on their products.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While proponents of vaccination argue that it helped eradicate [[smallpox]] and [[polio]], others cite improved hygiene as significant factors.  Regardless, new vaccines are being required of schoolchildren for numerous diseases that most will never be exposed to, such as [[Hepatitis B]], and diseases that are not dangerous to schoolchildren, such as [[chickenpox]].  Compulsory vaccination has also been required for [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], [[measles]], [[mumps]], and [[rubella]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All states have a [[religious]] exemption from compulsory vaccination except [[California]], [[Mississippi]] and [[West Virginia]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social Services]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Government]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Vaccines]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1432785</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1432785"/>
		<updated>2018-07-11T23:18:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: add controversy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 103-105 degrees F. Fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth (&amp;quot;Kopilk spots&amp;quot;). 1-7 days (usually 2-4)  after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. From 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurological damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Prevention==&lt;br /&gt;
One dose of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine is at least 95-98% effective in creating immunity to measles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cochrane.org/CD004407/ARI_using-combined-vaccine-protection-children-against-measles-mumps-and-rubella&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Two doses are recommended by the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is a live virus vaccine, and may cause some of the symptoms of measles, mumps, or rubella infections, such as fever, rash, and, in post pubescent females, temporary joint pain. Serious side effects listed by the WHO are as follows(1 in 10 means 1 case of the side effect per 10 doses of vaccine):&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/tools/MMR_vaccine_rates_information_sheet.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute arthritis (in teen girls and women): 1 in 10 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Febrile seizures: 1 in 2,000 to 3,000 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thrombocytopenia (a blood clotting disorder): 1 in 30,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mumps virus meningitis: 1 in 100,000 to 1,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anaphylaxis (life-threatening allergic reaction): 1 in 285,000 to 1,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encephalomyelitis (autoimmune brain injury): 1 in 1,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Because it is the most contagious vaccine-preventable disease in the United States,{{cn}} measles is often cited as a justification for [[mandatory vaccination]]. However, measles is extremely rare in the US,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; despite the fact that 17 states allow parents to opt out of vaccinating their children for any reason.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; MMR vaccine has been the subject of controversy ever since a series of studies by [[Andrew Wakefield]] and others in the late 1990s raised suspicions that the vaccine may cause autism and bowl disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/do-vaccines-cause-autism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Since then, reviews of non industry funded studies(although some studies may have been funded by the federal government)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/16/how-much-do-you-know-about-vaccine-safety.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cochrane.org/about-us/our-funders-and-partners&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; have not found evidence that MMR vaccine causes autism or bowle disease&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/6#144&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cochrane.org/CD004407/ARI_using-combined-vaccine-protection-children-against-measles-mumps-and-rubella&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_myths&amp;diff=1429156</id>
		<title>Liberal myths</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_myths&amp;diff=1429156"/>
		<updated>2018-06-20T00:40:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* List of liberal myths */ remove duplicate &amp;quot;many times&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal myths''' are falsehoods heavily supported by a destructive belief system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List of liberal myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberal beliefs include:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.twilightslastgleaming.com/myths.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that neither [[evil]] nor the [[devil]] exist.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that government titles make someone important or significant.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that there is man-made [[global warming]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nowpublic.com/some-exasperating-liberal-myths Some Exasperating Liberal Myths] NowPublic.com, August 27, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Earth]] and the universe are billions of years old.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that government regulations create jobs.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that environmental regulation saves lives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/nov/15/why-republican-attacks-environment-laws]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that there is no voter fraud, it's about the GOP wanting to prevent people from voting.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that “The failed economic policies of George W. Bush&amp;quot; caused the recession and high unemployment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/let-s-discuss-the-failed-economicy-policies-of-president-george-w-bush Let's discuss the &amp;quot;failed economicy policies&amp;quot; of President George W. Bush, Washington Examiner, December 9, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that unemployment benefits stimulate the economy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/30660 The unemployment ‘benefits’ compassion sham, CanadaFreePress, December 3, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the U.S. put Japanese soldiers to death for waterboarding.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/12/16/cheneys-claim-that-the-u-s-did-not-prosecute-japanese-soldiers-for-waterboarding/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that GOP gerrymandering was responsible for Democrats [[2014 Midterm Elections]] defeat.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Democrats lost the [[2010 Midterm elections]] because [[Barack Obama]] was not liberal enough.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that banning plastic bags, bottles, and other products will improve the environment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailycamera.com/guest-opinions/ci_23695266/gust-column-save-planet-use-plastic-bag Guest column: Save the planet, use a plastic bag, The Daily Camera, July 21, 2013]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Early American [[Pilgrim]]s were illegal immigrants when there were no such things as national boundaries in what is now the United States prior to its establishment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://weaselzippers.us/2011/11/26/msnbc-analyst-on-thanksgiving-pilgrims-were-illegal-immigrants-indians-99-percenters/ MSNBC Analyst On Thanksgiving: Pilgrims Were “Illegal Immigrants,” Indians 99 Percenters, Weasel Zippers, November 26, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; No government or immigration laws were in existence at the time. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that human beings are beginning to overpopulate. This myth is used as an attempt to justify abortion and the theory of anthropogenic global warming.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that people today are more knowledgeable and intelligent than in prior centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] tax cuts substantially reduced 2006 revenues and expanded the [[budget]] deficit.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the Bush tax cuts have not helped the economy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that some people are so poor they can only afford to eat Ramen Noodles.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that a [[fetus]] is not a living person.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim the [[embryonic stem cell]]s will provide many cures. Unlike adult stem cells, embryonic cells have provided no known cures.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[gun control]] reduces crime.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[abortion]] and [[breast cancer]] are unrelated. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[abortion]] and mental depression are unrelated.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[gambling]] financially benefits state school systems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/17/cbsnews_investigates/main3269456.shtml Is The Lottery Shortchanging Schools?] CBS News, September 17, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim to support the rights of women, never mentioning the oppressed women in Muslim countries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/womensrights/index.html About the Women's Rights Project] ACLU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[media]] is not biased toward the liberal agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that enabling [[oil]] drilling will not reduce long-term [[energy]] prices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2008/07/nancy_pelosis_energy_policy.php?comments=show Nancy Pelosi's Energy Policy] Rightwingnews.com, July 8, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that enabling oil drilling will not provide [[energy]] security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=33767 Oil Money May Buy Drilling Vote, Liberal Says] CNSNews.com, August 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that same-sex couple adoptions can replace the [[love]] from a mother and a father.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://lesbianlife.about.com/cs/families/a/adoption_2.htm  Lesbian and Gay Adoption Rights] About.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that an individual's [[sexual]] preference needs to be a protected civil right.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.civilrights.org/research_center/civilrights101/sexualorientation.html GAYS AND LESBIANS] Civilrights.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*That there is a [[vast right-wing conspiracy]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,359741,00.html THE VAST LEFT-WING CONSPIRACY] Fox News, May 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that opposing the [[homosexual agenda]] is [[bigotry]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boycottmcdonalds.com/detail.aspx?id=102 Boycott McDonald's!] American Family Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the US acted unilaterally in Iraq. The USA and Britain led a 30-nation coalition in Iraq.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.heritage.org/Research/Europe/wm558.cfm The Myth of U.S. Isolation] The Heritage Foundation, September 7, 2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[President Bush]] cheated in the 2000 Presidential election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=239 Floridagate] Democrats.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[President Bush]] lied about WMD in [[Iraq]] to grab [[oil]]. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Saddam Hussein]] was not seeking to buy yellowcake Uranium.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/14/tenet-niger/ Tenet Agrees To Cooperate With Congressional Investigation Into Niger Fraud] ThinkProgress, May 14, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[9/11]] terrorists attacks were an inside job by the [[USA]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Foreign Intelligence &amp;amp; Surveillance Act (FISA) is for spying on Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/35928prs20080709.html Senate Passes Unconstitutional Spying Bill] ACLU, July 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[big government]] will benefit its citizens.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/politics/candidates_public_service/2008/09/11/130009.html McCain, Obama Discuss Views on Public Service] Ap, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[military]] recruits are poor and uneducated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.heritage.org/research/nationalsecurity/cda05-08.cfm Who Bears the Burden? Demographic Characteristics of U.S. Military Recruits] Heritage Foundation, November 7, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200612/ai_n17197505 Rangel Is Wrong About Recruits] Human Events, December 4, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/31/kerry.mccain/  Bush on Kerry remark: U.S. troops are 'plenty smart'] CNN, November 1, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[government]]-run [[healthcare]] is better than a capitalist healthcare system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pslweb.org/site/News2?JServSessionIdr009=j7lglh8nq9.app5b&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=9238&amp;amp;news_iv_ctrl=1283 Free, universal health care must be a right!] VotePSL.org, may 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that going on the offense against [[terrorists]] creates more terrorists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/03/madeleine-albright-we-created-more.html  Madeleine Albright: &amp;quot;We Created More Terrorists... Our Soldiers Are the Problem&amp;quot;] Gateway Pundit, March 27, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that terrorism should be handled by [[law]] enforcement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902041.html Strategy Against Al-Qaeda Faulted] Washington Post, July 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,406901,00.html Bush: War on Terror is Not Law Enforcement Matter] AP, August 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the USA should negotiate with rogue [[nations]] and terror groups.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[socialism]] is superior to [[capitalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that there is a [[gene]] which causes people to become homosexuals. No such gene has been found by the scientific community.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[humans]] and [[ape]]s have a common ancestor.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[gender]] is more than male and female.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that misogynistic sexism is the reason for any supposed gender gap in wages. Numerous studies showing that the difference in wages for men and women doing similar jobs is caused mainly by personal choices. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[death penalty]] does not deter [[crime]]. Overwhelming evidence shows that the death penalty does deter crime.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[atheists]] are just as moral as [[Christians]] who regularly go to a church, or, in some cases, claim atheists are morally superior. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that all [[religions]] teach the same thing.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[intelligent design]] is not a science and has no evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that no climatologist or [[physicist]] rejects global warming. Ironically, the founder of The Weather Channel rejects global warming, as do thousands of other scientists.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Hitler was a [[Catholic]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that opposition to [[Obama]] is racism.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the general welfare clause in the Constitution gives government the right to force American citizens to buy government-run healthcare.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Jesus was the first [[socialist]] simply because he shared with others.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[affirmative action]] works.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[Old Testament]] is immoral.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Jews]] of today aren't the Jews of the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[feminism]] has no bias.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[homosexuals]] do not try to convert [[heterosexuals]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[gay marriage]] will not result in [[polygamy]] also being written into law.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[Bible]] is fictional, allegorical, or partially allegorical.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Liberal Christianity]] is compatible with the teachings of [[Jesus Christ]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that proper tire inflation can replace the need for additional oil drilling.&lt;br /&gt;
*That people should eat less red meat in order to combat [[climate change]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,418801,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim Jesus was a liberal or political leftist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/bernstein/works/1895/cromwell/09-communism.htm The 'Diggers' movement is held up as an example of good Christianity]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[Nation of Islam]] is unrelated to Islam the religion.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that portable school vouchers would destroy [[public schools]], yet send their own children to private schools.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that, if a person is [[pro-life]], that person does not care about people after birth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://twitter.com/movingleft Obnoxious supporter of Obama Twitter Account @MovingLeft (Warning:Vulgar)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that more African Americans died in wars of [[America]] than in [[abortion]]. 1,786 blacks are killed '''daily''' by abortion, one of two [[pregnant]] women will be suckered into pro-choice genocide. [http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/1685410938.html]&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that renaming [[War on Terror]] to Overseas Contingency Operation will reduce the threats facing America.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that cutting back on America's missile defenses will some how make the country more secure.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the nation will go bankrupt if we don't spend more tax dollars.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the United States must switch to unproven technologies for the environment's sake, such as wind or solar power. Yet, proven clean energy generated by nuclear power is not an option.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that a person cannot be pro-life if that person is [[pro-gun]] or pro-[[capital punishment]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that opposition to homosexuality and homosexual &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;, equals hatred of homosexuals or bigotry.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Donald Trump]]'s supporters are all racists, fascists, or, in Hillary Clinton's words, &amp;quot;deplorables&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Donald Trump]]'s views resemble [[Hitler]]'s.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Hitler]] was a conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that violent [[video game]]s like Doom or Quake aren't contributing to real life [[violence]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that guns are responsible for deaths. By that same logic, pencils are responsible for misspelled words.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that 47 million Americans don't have health insurance, while the actual number is between 10 and 15 million. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Essay:47 million Americans without health insurance lie‎]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that homosexuality cannot be overcome by therapy and prayer.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that homosexuality is inherent to a person's biology and not a choice of lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that higher income earners in America are not paying a &amp;quot;fair share&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the liberal [[mainstream media]] is unbiased, reliable, fair, and unchallengeable.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[conservative media]] is biased and unreliable.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[fake news]] is a conservative problem, when in fact it is a liberal problem.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that they are better than those who disagree them themselves. They open fire on anyone who doesn't agree with them, particularly conservatives and fundamentalist and biblical Christians, calling them false (and thus meaningless) slur words such as &amp;quot;fascist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;racist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bigoted,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;sexist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;misogynistic,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;neo-Nazi,&amp;quot; etc. They do this without realizing that the people they name-call are oftentimes more friendly and caring than themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Islam]] &amp;quot;has always been part of the American fabric&amp;quot; even as far back as the American Revolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (May 29, 2017). [http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/05/29/cnns-crusade-declare-islam-part-americas-founding/ CNN’s W. Kamau Bell: Islam Part of America’s Founding]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 29, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that it's impossible to be racist against White people because racism requires prejudice + power which is not only not the definition of racism, but its also not even true that non-whites don't have institutional power to harm whites. False accusations of racism have been used to attack white people many times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/360083-systemic-racism-is-so-rare-in-america-the-media-just-cant-stop-lying&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal myths about Donald Trump ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim by prominent Democrats, media elites, RINOS, and liberals in general that [[Donald Trump]] could not possibly be elected to be president of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Best Compilation- People Who Laughed at TRUMP...and said he would never be President]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4iZSW_76TE Democrats and Media Agreed: There Was No Way Donald Trump Could Be Elected]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQgq_R13V3s &amp;quot;You aren't laughing anymore, are you?&amp;quot; - Donald Trump - Deplorables Remix]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim by liberals that Donald Trump is a [[Fascism|fascist]]. In reality, Trump's agenda includes cutting back several areas of government. Trump says he plans on going directly to the American public via Twitter after he is elected president. There are no indications that Trump will have a state controlled media. Trump has some hostility to the media, which was colluding with the Democratic Party, especially Hillary Clinton, during the 2016 election.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Donald Trump is a [[Misogny|misogynist]]. The ''Washington Post'' reported, &amp;quot;Today, according to Trump’s attorney, [[Michael Cohen]], there are more women than men holding executive positions in the Trump Organization, heading such departments as human resources, golf and hotel management, and global licensing, even though women make up just 43 percent of the overall workforce.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/donald-trump-a-champion-of-women-his-female-employees-think-so/2015/11/23/7eafac80-88da-11e5-9a07-453018f9a0ec_story.html Donald Trump, a champion of women? His female employees think so.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among two of the first picks to fill positions in the Trump administration were Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina as his choice to become ambassador to the United Nations and Betsy DeVos to serve as  education secretary. [[Trump Tower]] was also constructed by a woman named Barbara Res who was also the first woman to construct a skyscraper. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Donald Trump was unqualified to be president. He has executive experience and is a politically astute real estate developer in New York City and other geographic areas. [[Dwight Eisenhower]], [[William Taft]], [[Zachary Taylor]] and [[George Washington]] were never elected to a government office before becoming President of the United States. Barack Obama called Hillary Clinton the most qualified person ever to run for president while leaving out her major foreign policy failures and other shortcomings as Secretary of State.&lt;br /&gt;
*The myth that American liberals are terrified of Donald Trump. [[Michael Moore]] compared Trump's election to [[Kristallnacht]], but no Trump supporters engaged in widespread acts of oppression or violence on the day of his election. No prominent liberals have fled the United States after Trump's elections, nor has there been a large flight of liberals from the United States after Trump's election. No prominent liberals who claimed they would move out of the country if Trump was elected have indicated that they were leaving the country.&lt;br /&gt;
*The liberal myth that Donald Trump is a virulent racist. One of the first acts of president-elect Trump was to pick the Indian-American [[Nikki Haley]] to become ambassador to the United Nations. In addition, Trump made several minority-appointments, including [[Ben Carson]] as [[Secretary of Housing and Urban Development|HUD Secretary]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal denialism associated with the fact that Donald Trump was elected to be president of the United States. Twitter hashtags and protest cries of &amp;quot;Not my president&amp;quot; despite widespread liberal complaints that Donald Trump would not accept the results of the election. Liberal schemes of getting electors of the electoral college to switch their votes).&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberals claim that Trump colluded with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Patriotism==&lt;br /&gt;
The liberal belief that an individual can claim to support the U.S. military, just not the mission and still be considered a 'Patriot'. In fact, the exact opposite is the truth. A liberal's patriotism, party-specific position, cannot support the troops if they are an impediment to their political left-wing strategy. The main reason for this has to due with passionate, partisan hatred for George W. Bush or any other conservative as commander in chief, the [[President of the United States of America]]. Liberals claim to support the military, claim not to support the mission, and refuse to support the Commander. The extremist left discounts the counter effect of troop morale. Understanding the true liberal mindset when it comes to supporting our U.S. troops, observe the often tried protest march. Though frustration boils over, actions lead from protest to outright sabotage or anarchism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/01/anti-war-protest-at-gop-convention-turns-violent/  Anti-War Protest at GOP Convention Turns Violent] Fox News, September 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal credibility fails and lack of concern for the support of America shows.  The left-wing cares so much for America's military they condone and actually prop up politicians that abuse troops with reckless accusations,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0907/Federal_judge_order_Murtha_to_testify_in_Haditha_defamation_case.html Federal judge orders Murtha to testify in Haditha defamation case] Politico, September 28, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; negative media coverage and ego trips.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blpic-kerrystuckiniraq.htm Political Humor] About.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal protesters look the other way as war memorials are vandalized. Liberals protest America's severely injured soldiers at the Walter Reed Medical Center.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crosswalk.com/1347570/ Anti-War Protests Target Wounded at Army Hospital] Crosswalk.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal protesters harass, damage or block military recruitment centers from operating business-as-usual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mfvov.com/blog/?p=505 Recruiting Center Attacks Coast to Coast] Military Families Voice of Victory, March 19, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This leftwing position, the myth is successful in feeding media driven discontent and mediocrity shame. If the news is bad, a liberal is spoon fed. If the news is good, the spoon-fed liberal is oblivious. e.g. &amp;quot;a complete suspension of disbelief&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patriotism, to your brother, who volunteers and risks the ultimate sacrifice out of love, will never be diminished. True patriots will always be in our gratitude and held in the highest light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==America Perceived==&lt;br /&gt;
The myth liberals give says we need to restore America's image in the world. Again, this mostly has to do with liberals' negative view of [[President Bush]]. Liberals want the two linked even though the myth is false. They blame Bush and Iraq for the bad USA image but the truth is that the credibility of the American left is a worse image than America's image abroad.  The main need for liberals to propagate this myth is the fact that [[socialist]] governments of Europe oppose the policy of [[Iraq]]. This further fuels liberals' political agenda to remove [[Republicans]] from power. Liberals love Europeans and cite their false socialist utopia at every chance.  European opposition automatically reinforces their belief that America's image is damaged. As of 2008, most of the [[European]] leaders that opposed Iraq are no longer in positions of power. The result, European [[conservatives]] were elected who publicly aligned themselves with America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those [[liberals]] that use the myth and regularly bash the USA are often called the &amp;quot;Blame America First&amp;quot; crowd. Though they never seem to mention that America gives more in donations, in total dollars, than any other country on Earth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-06-25-charitable_N.htm Americans give record $295B to charity] USA Today, 6/25/2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A sure way to change America's image in the world is to show the world we respect life. The repeal of Roe Vs. Wade would be a start.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reasons why [[America]] was hated prior to 2003 include wealth, women's rights, support for our democratic ally [[Israel]], democratic government, capitalist economy and exporting immorality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bad Successful Companies==&lt;br /&gt;
In the attempt to point fingers and lay blame, the liberals produce the myth that profits made by successful companies are bad for America. Only a select group of companies are targeted for public shame. This is a false myth because successful corporations actually create jobs and [[tax]] revenue. Retirement funds and municipal bonds rely heavily on the profits from these companies. Also, the reason these companies flourish is because the capitalist system rewards their hard work. The liberals will try to create sympathy, that they care for the average American, they are the ones going after wrongdoers to make it right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberals]] have demonized such companies as RJ Reynolds, Walmart, Halliburton and [[Blackwater]]. Their latest target is Exxon Mobil for their enormous profits and futures market oil speculators. Most of their accusations are absurd. Liberals in [[Congress]] don't blink an eye when it comes time to spend all that tax revenue generated. Liberals in Congress have been called on their [[hypocrisy]] for owning stocks in those companies. Which in turn, they divest their portfolios like nothing was ever wrong. For years, for decades, these companies have lobbied members of Congress, they have worked together for their common goals. In return, hefty [[campaign]] donations are their reward. Then for opportune reasons, liberals will publicly ridicule and verbally attack these bad, greedy capitalists. Corporate heads are brought before congress for a sideshow grilling to explain their actions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/01/MNU7VU217.DTL Congress asks Big Oil to justify big profits] The SF Chronicle, April 2, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Windfall Tax is just another example of the sham created by this liberal myth. Those companies make enough money, they should now be forced to give some back. They are threatened with nationalization &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=65111 Congresswoman threatens to nationalize oil industry] Worldnetdaily.com, May 23, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and further government regulation, a socialist scheme. As the price of gas fell, Congress just pretended like nothing ever happened, Big Oil off the hook.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Economy From The Previous 8 Years==&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt to spread Bush hatred without mentioning his name, it is common for liberals to lie and say ''&amp;quot;we're in this economic mess because of the policies over the previous eight years.&amp;quot;'' This is a myth, perpetuated by the corrupt in order to link bad economics with [[Conservatism]] and Bush policy.  These liberals are the very same individuals that would not recognize George W. Bush's economic successes when the economy was creating jobs. Bush, [[McCain]], [[Alan Greenspan]] are all on record as trying to fix the corrupt lending policies and government mismanagement for the past eight years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&amp;amp;NR=1 Financial Meltdown Video] YouTube&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; All the while Democrats were lining their pockets with [[Fannie Mae]] and [[Freddie Mac]] donations. Democrats are overwhelmingly responsible if they should point fingers. Democrats [[Barney Frank]], [[Chris Dodd]], [[John Kerry]], [[Charles Schumer]] and even [[Barack Obama]] are as much, if not directly, indirectly responsible for the failed economics of this country over the past eight-years. The same people who got us into this mess are now responsible for getting us out of financial meltdown. Blame can go all around on this one, both Republicans and Democrats. This was the result of many bad decisions over a long period of time. Then out of nowhere, financial calamity that nobody saw coming, except congressmen and women who were privy to bank collapses. They made good money while the rest of America suffered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2009/06/members_of_us_house_financial.html Members of U.S. House Financial Services Committee snapped up or dumped bank stocks as bottom fell out of market Cleveland.com June 25, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The truth of the matter; Bush-era 4.5% unemployment, Obama-era will it go higher than 10%?}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Torture==&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt by liberals to claim the [[U.S.]] committed war crimes after [[9/11]], Congress held an investigation into [[Enhanced interrogation]] by the CIA. The report would absolve the role of Congress, who were advised along the way, and label waterboarding as torture in violation of the Geneva convention. Liberals, backed by comments of Senator [[John McCain]], would argue that we put Japanese to death for waterboarding. It's a ridiculous notion that waterboarding was reason enough to justify execution. [[Japanese]] soldiers would beat U.S. servicemen to death, forced labor to death, starved to death. Many lost limbs to sword wielding commanders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=zNN6M97vYMEC&amp;amp;pg=PA98&amp;amp;lpg=PA98&amp;amp;dq=japanese+put+to+death+for+torture&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=bixUXAub86&amp;amp;sig=IRA-eCfErn8PtEB01sgMqiZBC-I&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwi-57b9kd_MAhVG4CYKHb3FAhA4ChDoAQhaMAk#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=japanese%20put%20to%20death%20for%20torture&amp;amp;f=false Imperial Japan's World War Two: 1931-1945, By Werner Gruhl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many U.S. serviceman and civilian contractors were executed without trial. Also, they were waterboarded. If GITMO detainees had it as bad as liberals claim, they wouldn't seek to stay.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x17sr7z_latest-gitmo-snag-prisoners-don-t-want-to-leave_news Latest Gitmo Snag: Prisoners Don't Want to Leave, DailyMotion, November 29, 2013]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; To equate enhanced interrogation with torture is a liberal myth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Denial]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_myths&amp;diff=1429154</id>
		<title>Liberal myths</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_myths&amp;diff=1429154"/>
		<updated>2018-06-20T00:33:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* List of liberal myths */ clarify that they are not actually trying to make global warming&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberal myths''' are falsehoods heavily supported by a destructive belief system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==List of liberal myths==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberal beliefs include:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.twilightslastgleaming.com/myths.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that neither [[evil]] nor the [[devil]] exist.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that government titles make someone important or significant.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that there is man-made [[global warming]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nowpublic.com/some-exasperating-liberal-myths Some Exasperating Liberal Myths] NowPublic.com, August 27, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Earth]] and the universe are billions of years old.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that government regulations create jobs.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that environmental regulation saves lives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/nov/15/why-republican-attacks-environment-laws]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that there is no voter fraud, it's about the GOP wanting to prevent people from voting.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that “The failed economic policies of George W. Bush&amp;quot; caused the recession and high unemployment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/let-s-discuss-the-failed-economicy-policies-of-president-george-w-bush Let's discuss the &amp;quot;failed economicy policies&amp;quot; of President George W. Bush, Washington Examiner, December 9, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that unemployment benefits stimulate the economy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/30660 The unemployment ‘benefits’ compassion sham, CanadaFreePress, December 3, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the U.S. put Japanese soldiers to death for waterboarding.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2014/12/16/cheneys-claim-that-the-u-s-did-not-prosecute-japanese-soldiers-for-waterboarding/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that GOP gerrymandering was responsible for Democrats [[2014 Midterm Elections]] defeat.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Democrats lost the [[2010 Midterm elections]] because [[Barack Obama]] was not liberal enough.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that banning plastic bags, bottles, and other products will improve the environment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailycamera.com/guest-opinions/ci_23695266/gust-column-save-planet-use-plastic-bag Guest column: Save the planet, use a plastic bag, The Daily Camera, July 21, 2013]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Early American [[Pilgrim]]s were illegal immigrants when there were no such things as national boundaries in what is now the United States prior to its establishment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://weaselzippers.us/2011/11/26/msnbc-analyst-on-thanksgiving-pilgrims-were-illegal-immigrants-indians-99-percenters/ MSNBC Analyst On Thanksgiving: Pilgrims Were “Illegal Immigrants,” Indians 99 Percenters, Weasel Zippers, November 26, 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; No government or immigration laws were in existence at the time. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that human beings are beginning to overpopulate. This myth is used as an attempt to justify abortion and the theory of anthropogenic global warming.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that people today are more knowledgeable and intelligent than in prior centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[George W. Bush|Bush]] tax cuts substantially reduced 2006 revenues and expanded the [[budget]] deficit.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the Bush tax cuts have not helped the economy.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that some people are so poor they can only afford to eat Ramen Noodles.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that a [[fetus]] is not a living person.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim the [[embryonic stem cell]]s will provide many cures. Unlike adult stem cells, embryonic cells have provided no known cures.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[gun control]] reduces crime.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[abortion]] and [[breast cancer]] are unrelated. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[abortion]] and mental depression are unrelated.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[gambling]] financially benefits state school systems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/09/17/cbsnews_investigates/main3269456.shtml Is The Lottery Shortchanging Schools?] CBS News, September 17, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim to support the rights of women, never mentioning the oppressed women in Muslim countries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/womensrights/index.html About the Women's Rights Project] ACLU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[media]] is not biased toward the liberal agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that enabling [[oil]] drilling will not reduce long-term [[energy]] prices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2008/07/nancy_pelosis_energy_policy.php?comments=show Nancy Pelosi's Energy Policy] Rightwingnews.com, July 8, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that enabling oil drilling will not provide [[energy]] security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=33767 Oil Money May Buy Drilling Vote, Liberal Says] CNSNews.com, August 7, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that same-sex couple adoptions can replace the [[love]] from a mother and a father.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://lesbianlife.about.com/cs/families/a/adoption_2.htm  Lesbian and Gay Adoption Rights] About.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that an individual's [[sexual]] preference needs to be a protected civil right.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.civilrights.org/research_center/civilrights101/sexualorientation.html GAYS AND LESBIANS] Civilrights.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*That there is a [[vast right-wing conspiracy]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,359741,00.html THE VAST LEFT-WING CONSPIRACY] Fox News, May 29, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that opposing the [[homosexual agenda]] is [[bigotry]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.boycottmcdonalds.com/detail.aspx?id=102 Boycott McDonald's!] American Family Association&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the US acted unilaterally in Iraq. The USA and Britain led a 30-nation coalition in Iraq.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.heritage.org/Research/Europe/wm558.cfm The Myth of U.S. Isolation] The Heritage Foundation, September 7, 2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[President Bush]] cheated in the 2000 Presidential election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://archive.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=239 Floridagate] Democrats.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[President Bush]] lied about WMD in [[Iraq]] to grab [[oil]]. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Saddam Hussein]] was not seeking to buy yellowcake Uranium.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/14/tenet-niger/ Tenet Agrees To Cooperate With Congressional Investigation Into Niger Fraud] ThinkProgress, May 14, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[9/11]] terrorists attacks were an inside job by the [[USA]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Foreign Intelligence &amp;amp; Surveillance Act (FISA) is for spying on Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/35928prs20080709.html Senate Passes Unconstitutional Spying Bill] ACLU, July 9, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[big government]] will benefit its citizens.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsmax.com/politics/candidates_public_service/2008/09/11/130009.html McCain, Obama Discuss Views on Public Service] Ap, September 11, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[military]] recruits are poor and uneducated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.heritage.org/research/nationalsecurity/cda05-08.cfm Who Bears the Burden? Demographic Characteristics of U.S. Military Recruits] Heritage Foundation, November 7, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200612/ai_n17197505 Rangel Is Wrong About Recruits] Human Events, December 4, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/31/kerry.mccain/  Bush on Kerry remark: U.S. troops are 'plenty smart'] CNN, November 1, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[government]]-run [[healthcare]] is better than a capitalist healthcare system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pslweb.org/site/News2?JServSessionIdr009=j7lglh8nq9.app5b&amp;amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=9238&amp;amp;news_iv_ctrl=1283 Free, universal health care must be a right!] VotePSL.org, may 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that going on the offense against [[terrorists]] creates more terrorists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/03/madeleine-albright-we-created-more.html  Madeleine Albright: &amp;quot;We Created More Terrorists... Our Soldiers Are the Problem&amp;quot;] Gateway Pundit, March 27, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that terrorism should be handled by [[law]] enforcement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/29/AR2008072902041.html Strategy Against Al-Qaeda Faulted] Washington Post, July 30, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,406901,00.html Bush: War on Terror is Not Law Enforcement Matter] AP, August 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the USA should negotiate with rogue [[nations]] and terror groups.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[socialism]] is superior to [[capitalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that there is a [[gene]] which causes people to become homosexuals. No such gene has been found by the scientific community.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[humans]] and [[ape]]s have a common ancestor.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[gender]] is more than male and female.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that misogynistic sexism is the reason for any supposed gender gap in wages. Numerous studies showing that the difference in wages for men and women doing similar jobs is caused mainly by personal choices. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[death penalty]] does not deter [[crime]]. Overwhelming evidence shows that the death penalty does deter crime.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[atheists]] are just as moral as [[Christians]] who regularly go to a church, or, in some cases, claim atheists are morally superior. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that all [[religions]] teach the same thing.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[intelligent design]] is not a science and has no evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that no climatologist or [[physicist]] rejects global warming. Ironically, the founder of The Weather Channel rejects global warming, as do thousands of other scientists.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Hitler was a [[Catholic]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that opposition to [[Obama]] is racism.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the general welfare clause in the Constitution gives government the right to force American citizens to buy government-run healthcare.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Jesus was the first [[socialist]] simply because he shared with others.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[affirmative action]] works.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[Old Testament]] is immoral.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Jews]] of today aren't the Jews of the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[feminism]] has no bias.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[homosexuals]] do not try to convert [[heterosexuals]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[gay marriage]] will not result in [[polygamy]] also being written into law.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[Bible]] is fictional, allegorical, or partially allegorical.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Liberal Christianity]] is compatible with the teachings of [[Jesus Christ]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that proper tire inflation can replace the need for additional oil drilling.&lt;br /&gt;
*That people should eat less red meat in order to combat [[climate change]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,418801,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim Jesus was a liberal or political leftist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/bernstein/works/1895/cromwell/09-communism.htm The 'Diggers' movement is held up as an example of good Christianity]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the [[Nation of Islam]] is unrelated to Islam the religion.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that portable school vouchers would destroy [[public schools]], yet send their own children to private schools.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that, if a person is [[pro-life]], that person does not care about people after birth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://twitter.com/movingleft Obnoxious supporter of Obama Twitter Account @MovingLeft (Warning:Vulgar)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that more African Americans died in wars of [[America]] than in [[abortion]]. 1,786 blacks are killed '''daily''' by abortion, one of two [[pregnant]] women will be suckered into pro-choice genocide. [http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/1685410938.html]&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that renaming [[War on Terror]] to Overseas Contingency Operation will reduce the threats facing America.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that cutting back on America's missile defenses will some how make the country more secure.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the nation will go bankrupt if we don't spend more tax dollars.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the United States must switch to unproven technologies for the environment's sake, such as wind or solar power. Yet, proven clean energy generated by nuclear power is not an option.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that a person cannot be pro-life if that person is [[pro-gun]] or pro-[[capital punishment]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that opposition to homosexuality and homosexual &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;, equals hatred of homosexuals or bigotry.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Donald Trump]]'s supporters are all racists, fascists, or, in Hillary Clinton's words, &amp;quot;deplorables&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Donald Trump]]'s views resemble [[Hitler]]'s.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Hitler]] was a conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that violent [[video game]]s like Doom or Quake aren't contributing to real life [[violence]].&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that guns are responsible for deaths. By that same logic, pencils are responsible for misspelled words.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that 47 million Americans don't have health insurance, while the actual number is between 10 and 15 million. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Essay:47 million Americans without health insurance lie‎]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that homosexuality cannot be overcome by therapy and prayer.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that homosexuality is inherent to a person's biology and not a choice of lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that higher income earners in America are not paying a &amp;quot;fair share&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that the liberal [[mainstream media]] is unbiased, reliable, fair, and unchallengeable.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[conservative media]] is biased and unreliable.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[fake news]] is a conservative problem, when in fact it is a liberal problem.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that they are better than those who disagree them themselves. They open fire on anyone who doesn't agree with them, particularly conservatives and fundamentalist and biblical Christians, calling them false (and thus meaningless) slur words such as &amp;quot;fascist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;racist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;bigoted,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;sexist,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;misogynistic,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;neo-Nazi,&amp;quot; etc. They do this without realizing that the people they name-call are oftentimes more friendly and caring than themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that [[Islam]] &amp;quot;has always been part of the American fabric&amp;quot; even as far back as the American Revolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (May 29, 2017). [http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/05/29/cnns-crusade-declare-islam-part-americas-founding/ CNN’s W. Kamau Bell: Islam Part of America’s Founding]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 29, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that it's impossible to be racist against White people because racism requires prejudice + power which is not only not the definition of racism, but its also not even true that non-whites don't have institutional power to harm whites. False accusations of racism have been used many times to attack white people many times. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/360083-systemic-racism-is-so-rare-in-america-the-media-just-cant-stop-lying&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal myths about Donald Trump ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim by prominent Democrats, media elites, RINOS, and liberals in general that [[Donald Trump]] could not possibly be elected to be president of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Best Compilation- People Who Laughed at TRUMP...and said he would never be President]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4iZSW_76TE Democrats and Media Agreed: There Was No Way Donald Trump Could Be Elected]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQgq_R13V3s &amp;quot;You aren't laughing anymore, are you?&amp;quot; - Donald Trump - Deplorables Remix]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim by liberals that Donald Trump is a [[Fascism|fascist]]. In reality, Trump's agenda includes cutting back several areas of government. Trump says he plans on going directly to the American public via Twitter after he is elected president. There are no indications that Trump will have a state controlled media. Trump has some hostility to the media, which was colluding with the Democratic Party, especially Hillary Clinton, during the 2016 election.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Donald Trump is a [[Misogny|misogynist]]. The ''Washington Post'' reported, &amp;quot;Today, according to Trump’s attorney, [[Michael Cohen]], there are more women than men holding executive positions in the Trump Organization, heading such departments as human resources, golf and hotel management, and global licensing, even though women make up just 43 percent of the overall workforce.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/donald-trump-a-champion-of-women-his-female-employees-think-so/2015/11/23/7eafac80-88da-11e5-9a07-453018f9a0ec_story.html Donald Trump, a champion of women? His female employees think so.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Among two of the first picks to fill positions in the Trump administration were Gov. Nikki Haley of South Carolina as his choice to become ambassador to the United Nations and Betsy DeVos to serve as  education secretary. [[Trump Tower]] was also constructed by a woman named Barbara Res who was also the first woman to construct a skyscraper. &lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that Donald Trump was unqualified to be president. He has executive experience and is a politically astute real estate developer in New York City and other geographic areas. [[Dwight Eisenhower]], [[William Taft]], [[Zachary Taylor]] and [[George Washington]] were never elected to a government office before becoming President of the United States. Barack Obama called Hillary Clinton the most qualified person ever to run for president while leaving out her major foreign policy failures and other shortcomings as Secretary of State.&lt;br /&gt;
*The myth that American liberals are terrified of Donald Trump. [[Michael Moore]] compared Trump's election to [[Kristallnacht]], but no Trump supporters engaged in widespread acts of oppression or violence on the day of his election. No prominent liberals have fled the United States after Trump's elections, nor has there been a large flight of liberals from the United States after Trump's election. No prominent liberals who claimed they would move out of the country if Trump was elected have indicated that they were leaving the country.&lt;br /&gt;
*The liberal myth that Donald Trump is a virulent racist. One of the first acts of president-elect Trump was to pick the Indian-American [[Nikki Haley]] to become ambassador to the United Nations. In addition, Trump made several minority-appointments, including [[Ben Carson]] as [[Secretary of Housing and Urban Development|HUD Secretary]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberal denialism associated with the fact that Donald Trump was elected to be president of the United States. Twitter hashtags and protest cries of &amp;quot;Not my president&amp;quot; despite widespread liberal complaints that Donald Trump would not accept the results of the election. Liberal schemes of getting electors of the electoral college to switch their votes).&lt;br /&gt;
*Liberals claim that Trump colluded with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Patriotism==&lt;br /&gt;
The liberal belief that an individual can claim to support the U.S. military, just not the mission and still be considered a 'Patriot'. In fact, the exact opposite is the truth. A liberal's patriotism, party-specific position, cannot support the troops if they are an impediment to their political left-wing strategy. The main reason for this has to due with passionate, partisan hatred for George W. Bush or any other conservative as commander in chief, the [[President of the United States of America]]. Liberals claim to support the military, claim not to support the mission, and refuse to support the Commander. The extremist left discounts the counter effect of troop morale. Understanding the true liberal mindset when it comes to supporting our U.S. troops, observe the often tried protest march. Though frustration boils over, actions lead from protest to outright sabotage or anarchism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/01/anti-war-protest-at-gop-convention-turns-violent/  Anti-War Protest at GOP Convention Turns Violent] Fox News, September 1, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal credibility fails and lack of concern for the support of America shows.  The left-wing cares so much for America's military they condone and actually prop up politicians that abuse troops with reckless accusations,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0907/Federal_judge_order_Murtha_to_testify_in_Haditha_defamation_case.html Federal judge orders Murtha to testify in Haditha defamation case] Politico, September 28, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; negative media coverage and ego trips.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blpic-kerrystuckiniraq.htm Political Humor] About.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal protesters look the other way as war memorials are vandalized. Liberals protest America's severely injured soldiers at the Walter Reed Medical Center.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crosswalk.com/1347570/ Anti-War Protests Target Wounded at Army Hospital] Crosswalk.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal protesters harass, damage or block military recruitment centers from operating business-as-usual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://mfvov.com/blog/?p=505 Recruiting Center Attacks Coast to Coast] Military Families Voice of Victory, March 19, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This leftwing position, the myth is successful in feeding media driven discontent and mediocrity shame. If the news is bad, a liberal is spoon fed. If the news is good, the spoon-fed liberal is oblivious. e.g. &amp;quot;a complete suspension of disbelief&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patriotism, to your brother, who volunteers and risks the ultimate sacrifice out of love, will never be diminished. True patriots will always be in our gratitude and held in the highest light.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==America Perceived==&lt;br /&gt;
The myth liberals give says we need to restore America's image in the world. Again, this mostly has to do with liberals' negative view of [[President Bush]]. Liberals want the two linked even though the myth is false. They blame Bush and Iraq for the bad USA image but the truth is that the credibility of the American left is a worse image than America's image abroad.  The main need for liberals to propagate this myth is the fact that [[socialist]] governments of Europe oppose the policy of [[Iraq]]. This further fuels liberals' political agenda to remove [[Republicans]] from power. Liberals love Europeans and cite their false socialist utopia at every chance.  European opposition automatically reinforces their belief that America's image is damaged. As of 2008, most of the [[European]] leaders that opposed Iraq are no longer in positions of power. The result, European [[conservatives]] were elected who publicly aligned themselves with America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those [[liberals]] that use the myth and regularly bash the USA are often called the &amp;quot;Blame America First&amp;quot; crowd. Though they never seem to mention that America gives more in donations, in total dollars, than any other country on Earth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-06-25-charitable_N.htm Americans give record $295B to charity] USA Today, 6/25/2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A sure way to change America's image in the world is to show the world we respect life. The repeal of Roe Vs. Wade would be a start.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reasons why [[America]] was hated prior to 2003 include wealth, women's rights, support for our democratic ally [[Israel]], democratic government, capitalist economy and exporting immorality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bad Successful Companies==&lt;br /&gt;
In the attempt to point fingers and lay blame, the liberals produce the myth that profits made by successful companies are bad for America. Only a select group of companies are targeted for public shame. This is a false myth because successful corporations actually create jobs and [[tax]] revenue. Retirement funds and municipal bonds rely heavily on the profits from these companies. Also, the reason these companies flourish is because the capitalist system rewards their hard work. The liberals will try to create sympathy, that they care for the average American, they are the ones going after wrongdoers to make it right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberals]] have demonized such companies as RJ Reynolds, Walmart, Halliburton and [[Blackwater]]. Their latest target is Exxon Mobil for their enormous profits and futures market oil speculators. Most of their accusations are absurd. Liberals in [[Congress]] don't blink an eye when it comes time to spend all that tax revenue generated. Liberals in Congress have been called on their [[hypocrisy]] for owning stocks in those companies. Which in turn, they divest their portfolios like nothing was ever wrong. For years, for decades, these companies have lobbied members of Congress, they have worked together for their common goals. In return, hefty [[campaign]] donations are their reward. Then for opportune reasons, liberals will publicly ridicule and verbally attack these bad, greedy capitalists. Corporate heads are brought before congress for a sideshow grilling to explain their actions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/01/MNU7VU217.DTL Congress asks Big Oil to justify big profits] The SF Chronicle, April 2, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Windfall Tax is just another example of the sham created by this liberal myth. Those companies make enough money, they should now be forced to give some back. They are threatened with nationalization &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=65111 Congresswoman threatens to nationalize oil industry] Worldnetdaily.com, May 23, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and further government regulation, a socialist scheme. As the price of gas fell, Congress just pretended like nothing ever happened, Big Oil off the hook.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Economy From The Previous 8 Years==&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt to spread Bush hatred without mentioning his name, it is common for liberals to lie and say ''&amp;quot;we're in this economic mess because of the policies over the previous eight years.&amp;quot;'' This is a myth, perpetuated by the corrupt in order to link bad economics with [[Conservatism]] and Bush policy.  These liberals are the very same individuals that would not recognize George W. Bush's economic successes when the economy was creating jobs. Bush, [[McCain]], [[Alan Greenspan]] are all on record as trying to fix the corrupt lending policies and government mismanagement for the past eight years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&amp;amp;NR=1 Financial Meltdown Video] YouTube&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; All the while Democrats were lining their pockets with [[Fannie Mae]] and [[Freddie Mac]] donations. Democrats are overwhelmingly responsible if they should point fingers. Democrats [[Barney Frank]], [[Chris Dodd]], [[John Kerry]], [[Charles Schumer]] and even [[Barack Obama]] are as much, if not directly, indirectly responsible for the failed economics of this country over the past eight-years. The same people who got us into this mess are now responsible for getting us out of financial meltdown. Blame can go all around on this one, both Republicans and Democrats. This was the result of many bad decisions over a long period of time. Then out of nowhere, financial calamity that nobody saw coming, except congressmen and women who were privy to bank collapses. They made good money while the rest of America suffered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2009/06/members_of_us_house_financial.html Members of U.S. House Financial Services Committee snapped up or dumped bank stocks as bottom fell out of market Cleveland.com June 25, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The truth of the matter; Bush-era 4.5% unemployment, Obama-era will it go higher than 10%?}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Torture==&lt;br /&gt;
In an attempt by liberals to claim the [[U.S.]] committed war crimes after [[9/11]], Congress held an investigation into [[Enhanced interrogation]] by the CIA. The report would absolve the role of Congress, who were advised along the way, and label waterboarding as torture in violation of the Geneva convention. Liberals, backed by comments of Senator [[John McCain]], would argue that we put Japanese to death for waterboarding. It's a ridiculous notion that waterboarding was reason enough to justify execution. [[Japanese]] soldiers would beat U.S. servicemen to death, forced labor to death, starved to death. Many lost limbs to sword wielding commanders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=zNN6M97vYMEC&amp;amp;pg=PA98&amp;amp;lpg=PA98&amp;amp;dq=japanese+put+to+death+for+torture&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=bixUXAub86&amp;amp;sig=IRA-eCfErn8PtEB01sgMqiZBC-I&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwi-57b9kd_MAhVG4CYKHb3FAhA4ChDoAQhaMAk#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=japanese%20put%20to%20death%20for%20torture&amp;amp;f=false Imperial Japan's World War Two: 1931-1945, By Werner Gruhl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many U.S. serviceman and civilian contractors were executed without trial. Also, they were waterboarded. If GITMO detainees had it as bad as liberals claim, they wouldn't seek to stay.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x17sr7z_latest-gitmo-snag-prisoners-don-t-want-to-leave_news Latest Gitmo Snag: Prisoners Don't Want to Leave, DailyMotion, November 29, 2013]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; To equate enhanced interrogation with torture is a liberal myth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Denial]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1429153</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1429153"/>
		<updated>2018-06-20T00:30:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Prevention */ add serious side effects&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 103-105 degrees F. Fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth (&amp;quot;Kopilk spots&amp;quot;). 1-7 days (usually 2-4)  after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. From 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurological damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Prevention==&lt;br /&gt;
One dose of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine is at least 95-98% effective in creating immunity to measles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cochrane.org/CD004407/ARI_using-combined-vaccine-protection-children-against-measles-mumps-and-rubella&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Two doses are recommended by the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is a live virus vaccine, and may cause some of the symptoms of measles, mumps, or rubella infections, such as fever, rash, and, in post pubescent females, temporary joint pain. Serious side effects listed by the WHO are as follows(1 in 10 means 1 case of the side effect per 10 doses of vaccine):&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/tools/MMR_vaccine_rates_information_sheet.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute arthritis (in teen girls and women): 1 in 10 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Febrile seizures: 1 in 2,000 to 3,000 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thrombocytopenia (a blood clotting disorder): 1 in 30,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mumps virus meningitis: 1 in 100,000 to 1,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anaphylaxis (life-threatening allergic reaction): 1 in 285,000 to 1,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Encephalomyelitis (autoimmune brain injury): 1 in 1,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421911</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421911"/>
		<updated>2018-05-14T00:10:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Prevention */ add sources&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 103-105 degrees F. Fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth (&amp;quot;Kopilk spots&amp;quot;). 1-7 days (usually 2-4)  after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. From 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurological damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Prevention==&lt;br /&gt;
One dose of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine is at least 95-98% effective in creating immunity to measles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cochrane.org/CD004407/ARI_using-combined-vaccine-protection-children-against-measles-mumps-and-rubella&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Two doses are recommended by the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is a live virus vaccine, and may cause some of the symptoms of measles, mumps, or rubella infections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/initiative/tools/MMR_vaccine_rates_information_sheet.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421910</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421910"/>
		<updated>2018-05-14T00:08:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: add vaccine, not finished yet&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 103-105 degrees F. Fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth (&amp;quot;Kopilk spots&amp;quot;). 1-7 days (usually 2-4)  after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. From 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurological damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Prevention==&lt;br /&gt;
One dose of the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine is at least 95-98% effective in creating immunity to measles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cochrane.org/CD004407/ARI_using-combined-vaccine-protection-children-against-measles-mumps-and-rubella&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Two doses are recommended by the CDC. This is a live virus vaccine, and therefore may cause some of the symptoms of measles, mumps, or rubella infections. &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421905</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421905"/>
		<updated>2018-05-13T23:52:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Symptoms */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 103-105 degrees F. Fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth (&amp;quot;Kopilk spots&amp;quot;). 1-7 days (usually 2-4)  after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. From 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurologic damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421904</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421904"/>
		<updated>2018-05-13T23:52:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Symptoms */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 103-105 degrees F. Fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth (&amp;quot;Kopilk spots&amp;quot;). 1-7 days (usually 2-4)  after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. from 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurologic damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421903</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421903"/>
		<updated>2018-05-13T23:51:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Symptoms */ clarify&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 103-105 degrees F. Fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth (&amp;quot;Kopilk spots&amp;quot;). 1-7 (usually 2-4) days after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. from 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurologic damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421902</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421902"/>
		<updated>2018-05-13T23:50:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Symptoms */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 103-105 degrees F. Fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth (&amp;quot;Kopilk spots&amp;quot;). 2-4 days after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. from 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurologic damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421901</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421901"/>
		<updated>2018-05-13T23:49:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Symptoms */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 103-105 degrees F. Fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth. 2-4 days after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. from 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurologic damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421900</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421900"/>
		<updated>2018-05-13T23:49:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Symptoms */ typo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 103-105 degrees F. fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth. 2-4 days after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. from 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurologic damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421663</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421663"/>
		<updated>2018-05-12T23:58:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Symptoms */ add complications&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 105 degrees F. fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth. 2-4 days after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. from 1985 to 1992 8% of measles cases in the US involved diarrhea, 7% resulted in ear infection, 6% resulted in pneumonia, 0.6-0.7% involved seizures, and 0.2% (1 in 500) were fatal (usually due to pneumonia or encephalitis), according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Acute encephalitis (brain inflammation) occurs in about 0.1% of measles cases (1 encephalitis case per 1,000 measles infections), and is fatal in 15% of cases, with up to 25% of survivors suffering permanent neurologic damage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421662</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421662"/>
		<updated>2018-05-12T23:48:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: add symptomes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the [[United States]] in 2011. The [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In recent years, the number of measles cases in the U.S. has increased. According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the CDC announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symptoms==&lt;br /&gt;
A fever typically begins 10-12 days after exposure, the fever increases in stepwise fashion, often reaching 105 degrees F. fever is followed by runny nose, pinkeye, and distinctive white spots inside the mouth. 2-4 days after onset of fever, a rash appears at the hairline, this rash spreads over the body and then disappears in the order that it appears, lasting a total of 5-6 days. Peeling skin may occur on those body parts most affected by the rash. 8% of measles cases involve diarrhea, 7% result in ear infection, and 6% result in pneumonia, according to the CDC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421504</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421504"/>
		<updated>2018-05-12T02:18:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: add brief transmission section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the United States in 2011. The [[Center for Disease Control]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, the number of measles cases in the United States has increased, According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the US.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the Center for Disease Control announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transmission==&lt;br /&gt;
Measles is very contagious, the virus is spread by respiratory droplets (when an infected person coughs, sneezes, etc). Measles virus can survive in the air and on surfaces for up to 2 hours, and 90% of non-immune people who are exposed to measles become infected&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421502</id>
		<title>Measles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Measles&amp;diff=1421502"/>
		<updated>2018-05-12T02:10:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: replace dead link, adjust wording to reflect new source, clarify that the cdc did not specify whether there was more travle of less vaccination of travlers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Measles''' is a highly [[contagious]], but rarely fatal, viral [[disease]]. There were 220 reported cases of measles in the United States in 2011. The [[Center for Disease Control]] attributes most of these cases to parents choosing not to vaccinate their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, the number of measles cases in the United States has increased, According to the CDC, this is due to unvaccinated travelers contracting measles overseas and then spreading the virus when they return to the US.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2011/05/24/136618682/u-s-measles-cases-hit-15-year-high?ps=sh_sthdl]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2013, the Center for Disease Control announced that measles outbreaks were increasing, almost entirely among people who were not properly vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/12/05/measles-cdc-vaccine-vaccinations-disease/3878375/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421134</id>
		<title>Talk:Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421134"/>
		<updated>2018-05-10T03:45:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* vaccine panels */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm surprised. This is an acceptable article. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. it is.  It actually tells me something.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blaylock Wellness Report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter; it has &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Discover &amp;quot;the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome&amp;quot;? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:12, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gardasil ==&lt;br /&gt;
The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. I'm going to remove this bullet. -- [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bullet has been restored. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, 22 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are '''unknown''' - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though; since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:36, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the [[Hippocratic Oath]]: ''Never bring harm upon anyone.'' In latin, ''primum non nocere''. First of all, do no harm. By that standard, a physician who does ''anything'' to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. But modern [[medicine]] has forgotten that lesson and in that manner has gone completely off the rails. And Gardasil is a prime example.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This detracts from the point that I haven't seen what the &amp;quot;link&amp;quot; is - i.e. the cited article is a secondary source and therefore not strong enough to justify the statement in this article regarding vaccines.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Oath also mentions not cutting out stones as well.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In all seriousness, it is simply impossible to verify the safety of any drugs completely before phase IV clinical trials - meaning after the drugs has been marketed. Unless you test the drug on every single person on earth and obtain a reading on it, no drug is &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;. Patient care is always riddled with uncertainty - and if physicians waits until he's 100% all the time, they'd actually do more harm to patients by their inaction. That's when professional judgment and experience comes in.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And to bring this back to our original discussion about _this_ article - all drugs have adverse reactions. Stating that Gardasil &amp;quot;has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration&amp;quot; from a news article (as opposed to a medical journal) is just a cheap, baseless way of attacking vaccines. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:08, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you give that drug to ''your'' daughter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've read medical journals. They are not the platinum standard of scientific inquiry that you believe them to be. I have personally seen ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' duped big-time by someone&amp;amp;mdash;at [[Duke University]], no less&amp;amp;mdash;pulling a total dry-lab job. Imagine the mortification of the senior professor who signed off on that person's papers, and even put his name on them, when he found out ''years later'' what a puerile fraud his student had been, and had to issue retractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I have seen other things get into ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' from &amp;quot;investigators&amp;quot; who were all on drug-company payrolls. I cite [[RU-486]] as a prime example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And that's just one journal, a journal that I might add already had developed an unsavory reputation among teaching-hospital staffers, from the chairman level through the attending level and on down to the residents, for scholarship that was less than sterling. I cannot even repeat their toilet-humor pun on the journal's name&amp;amp;mdash;at least, not here I can't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those who comment on, and especially those who make, public policy would be a lot more effective if they would just do a little bit of critical reading every now and then.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, I'm trying to improve the validity of this article by analyzing the references, not arguing for or against the efficacy or hazards of the vaccine. Why do you ask me whether I'd give the vaccine to my daughter? Unless my answer is going to be part of this article, it is absolutely irrelevant. (For your information, I do not have any children, and if I had a daughter I will not give her the shot before the age of 16. When she's reached that age she'll make her own decision regarding the shot.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you cite a primary source, it'd remove any potential bias that inherently exists in secondary sources. All I've been trying to say is that you should read that news article with the same attitude as you should with medical journals - with a grain of salt. Especially given the gravity of the statement - that the deaths has been linked to the vaccine - I believe we need something a little more than a news article. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 22:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The article gives some damaging evidence of a correlation. And while correlation does not equal causation, those quoted as denying the causal link would be motivated frankly to lie about the causal link. They include the manufacturer and a health-authority bureaucrat who wants to protect the justification of his mandate and budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I asked you whether you'd give your daughter the shot, if you had one, because I wanted to put the matter into a perspective that, all too often, public policymakers ignore. I appreciate your stepping up to the plate&amp;amp;mdash;though if you want the advice of one who once associated with the white smocks on a regular basis, I'd say that the time to safeguard any young woman from the hazards either of the shot or the thing that the shot is supposed (har-de-har-har) to protect against is about ten years ''earlier'' than any age of hypothetical &amp;quot;emancipation.&amp;quot; This after-the-fact pilltaking and muscle-jabbing and mainlining that doctors recommend these days is doing nothing to treat the underlying causes of sickness and, in my opinion as an &amp;quot;expert emeritus,&amp;quot; is making our society even sicker.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:00, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DouglasA. I am not 'pushing a socialist agenda' I am pointing out the facts. If THIS contradicts YOUR agenda then it is not my problem. The article originally cited makes no mention whatsoever of MMR which is exactly the topic under discussion in that section. That article may have in the NHS page but not here. To try and extend the point being made by the referenced article to MMR is purely speculation on your part and has no logical basis. However, it has been documented countless times that the decrease in MMR uptake is due to parents having opted out given the debunked claims over its links with autism. The reference I provided DOES actually mention MMR unlike the original. And as someone living in the UK I can tell you that there is no end of attempts by hte NHS to increase MMR uptake. You obviously don't approve of a socialized healthcare system, but to extend this to making purely speculative criticisms and claiming them as fact is uncalled for. There are valid criticisms of the NHS to be made, but this is not one of them. Is it so difficult to accept that even a system you so fundamentally disagree with has its advantages and is actually working to benefit people in this case? [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:30, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DWiggins, if you please, can you find other sources that bolster your claim about no autism/vaccination link, such as papers from the scientific community?  They would be better references than a single newspaper report.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:39, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The link was long ago debunked as it says even on this very article! My point is not a question of whether the link is real, but that the supposed link is the reason why there has been a decrease in MMR uptake. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:41, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you better read this article [http://www.naturalnews.com/011764_mercury_thimerosal_vaccines.html], because there may not be an autism link within the vaccination's actual medical content, but there is a definate link between autism and [[thimerosal]], which contains 49% mercury.  Remember the &amp;quot;Mad Hatter&amp;quot; from ''Alice in Wonderland''?  Based on fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I took out the &amp;quot;now debunked&amp;quot; line.  I think that it reads to nearly everyone's satisfaction now.  Does the MMR vaccine contain thimerosal?  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::According to this, it doesn't. [http://www.nfid.org/pdf/factsheets/thimerosal.pdf] --12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well i'm afraid Karajou that the article you provided is by no means whatsoever an authoritative source. There is consensus in the scientific community that there is no link between thimerosal and autism. To quote but another news article is simply missing the point. In large part it was the media that was to blame in stirring up this nonsense, whereas the science gave them no reason to. Take for example these two (of countless) examples which give a pretty thorough overview of the science behind the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17168158&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both dismiss a casual link between the chemical and autism, and show that there is no evidence in the scientific literature to support such a link. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DWiggins, the source I provided quotes from the pages of peer-reviewed papers from medical doctors, which means there is no consensus, as you claimed.  Since you missed reading them, I have posted them here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal&lt;br /&gt;
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system. &lt;br /&gt;
'''What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two! &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism. &lt;br /&gt;
'''A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a &amp;quot;development disability',&amp;quot; according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. &amp;quot;This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses &amp;quot;may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So not to try to revive a dead topic or anything, but today ''The Lancet'' fully and officially retracted the article it originally published that found the link between the MMR vaccine and Autism (I know the link is from a liberal website, but I feel like it's hard news so it's okay): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/emthe-lancetem-retracted_b_447341.html -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 10:46, 3 February 2010 (EST) (This is irrelevant, but I thought it was neat that the reCaptcha thing it's making me type to put the link in is &amp;quot;Caduceus&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NHS and vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::DouglasA by rejecting my edit and reinstating the original you were making such a claim. And the miseducation is not caused BY the NHS. The NHS has consistently rejected the claims about a link between autism and MMR. Again, just because you disagree with the concept of the NHS does not mean everything they do is bad wrong. I do not think anyone who knows anything about the NHS could ever argue they have not consistently tried to increase MMR uptake. By all means add that original article about costs and medicines, but you cannot simply link that to this MMR issue when there is nothing in that article to support this leap between two separate issues, and when in fact the evidence contradicts it in the case of MMR. By all means take out the bit about the promotion of the vaccine by the NHS, I put it in to counter the original false claims that the decrease in uptake was entirely the fault of the NHS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In regards to the above section, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of 'consensus'. Consensus is rarely unanimous, especially in fields so large as medicine. Consensus is the vast majority accepting something, and that is the case with the MMR vaccine and the supposed links to autism, which have been thoroughly rejected. Of course there will always be some who disagree, and unfortunately in a few cases, as with Dr. Wakefield, this disagreement is not all that it seems on the surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let's be clear about this. All the reviews of the scientific literature come out with the same conclusion. There is NO evidence to support a casual link between either thiomersal and autism, nor the MMR vaccine and autism. May I also request that you do not try and mix two separate issues together. The article cited originally concerning costs and medicine provision is not related to the MMR issue or any vaccine issue. It has no place in ''this'' article, though it may do elsewhere. I think that is the fundamental issue here, the issue of the links with autism is already discussed in the article itself where it is stated that there is no evidence.[[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 15:03, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DWiggins, a vast majority agreeing on something - a ''consensus'' - still doesn't make their position ''right'' as opposed to ''wrong''.  A vast ''consensus'' of people in the United States viewed slavery as ''right'' at one time in our history; were they correct in believing so?  No.  So how can a consensus of doctors be correct in viewing that there's no vaccination link to autism, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that mercury in a human body (as in thimerosal) does bad things?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:48, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I never said it 'makes their position right'. And in using the slavery example you are mixing up science and ethics. What is 'right' from a scientific point of view is something that has not yet been falsified, so it is perhaps better to say 'provisionally accepted' (please see my post on the Noah's Ark page I have recently made concerning the scientific method). The slavery example is a question of whether someone views slavery as morally 'right'. Of course to virtually everyone today the answer seems obvious, it is not. But as you say in the past this was not so simple, and many people saw it the opposite way. Our judgement of these people and their actions is retrospective, of course we view them as wrong, but they evidently believed they were right. Anyway, that is just an aside, since it is not relevant to the question of scientific proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It has been shown time and time again, through application of the scientific method that there is no casual link between MMR or thiomersal and autism. All claims otherwise have since been falsified, as such, the only logical conclusion that can currently be reached is that there is no such link. And you are also getting mixed up with your biochemistry. Yes, mercury is toxic. But thiomersal is not mercury, it is a compound containing the element. The pseudoscience behind the supposed link is that it has mercury, therefore it must be toxic, as if the mercury component jsut spontaneously separates from the rest of the compound in the human body. There is NO evidence to support a link between thiomersal and autism. I don't know how many more times it needs to be stated, by either me, or those men and women wearing the white coats who have investigated this time and time again. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Another aside: So there's no connection or relevence between scientific proof, the scientific method, and morality?  Thanks for clearing that up.  The Nazi Doctors must've had, as you say, provisionally accepted truth.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 06:52, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well now that I'm back I can address that point. You appear to have muddled the issues up a bit. I was not passing moral judgement on scientific discoveries, I was simply saying that a scientific 'truth' is not the same as a moral 'truth'. What the Nazi 'doctors' were doing was not even science, it was just butchery with the name science applied to it. Science can tell us what something is/how something works. It cannot tell us whether we should do something, though it can form a platform from which to make such decisions. Of course there's a connection between science and morality, but the scientific method is not a method of judging whether something is morally right or wrong, morality comes in when deciding how to use the results of scientific enquiry. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 19:28, 24 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's explore the connection between vaccines and STDs.&lt;br /&gt;
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPVSupplement99.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
HPV causes 99.7 percent of cervical cancer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=10451482]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what would be the motivation of giving young teenage girls a vaccine against HPV? Aren't we telling our daughters that it's okay to abandon God's plan (of chastity before marriage) and indulge in a little experimental fornication? &amp;quot;Hey, we're protecting you so nothing bad will happen.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:21, 21 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And when they say 'teenage' girls they don't mean 19 year old young adults, they mean 13 year old CHILDREN!  When such young people see what they see as authority figures (ie doctors) giving them the green light to indulge in promiscuous, dangerous behaviour, what are they going to think? [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 13:39, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flu Vaccine Updates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be included that influenza vaccine must be updated every year because the influenza virus evolves so readily? Or is this fact contrary to the worldview of this encyclopaedia?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know if &amp;quot;evolve&amp;quot; is the right term to use here. The influenza virus &amp;quot;mutates&amp;quot; (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Andrew Wakefield ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== vaccine panels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives. The meetings are not open to the public. They do not usually do much analysis, and tend to recommend whatever vaccines are available''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement throws out some pretty big accusations.  I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is even remotely true.   I'll give it a few days and if no-one finds a credible source then it'll be removed.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:53, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It is all true. What part do you doubt? The CDC regularly publishes the vaccine recommendations, and you can see much of this for yourself in those published reports. They have to grant waivers to the panel members to bypass govt conflict-of-interest laws. I agree that citations are needed, but please don't remove it unless you find some evidence that it is false. If it were false, it should be obvious from those CDC reports. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:48, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I doubt most of it actually.  I suppose I need to take a small step back and admit that all my experience dealing with Pharmaceuticals and vaccines comes from dealing (in a legal advisory capacity) with Pharmac which is the NZ regulatory and funding board for all medicines and treatments, I'm not familiar with the US experience.  Having said that, I know that the amount of scrutiny and participation by the public is very extensive.  In fact I have often heard people who work at Pharmac say that there is far too much consultation and attention paid to consumer groups and other groups who come from a strictly less than medical cost/benefit analysis.  I won't remove it because I accept that you might have some expertise in this area, but I do suggest we tighten up the wording a little.  At the moment the paragraph makes us appear angry and slightly conspiratorial, not learned critics of a flawed system.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:00, 6 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I followed this more about 10 years ago. I tried to get minutes of the meetings. I got some partial ones, but they were not posted in the internet, and they said that some could not be released because trade secret drug industry info was discussed. From what I got, there was no serious analysis. In one case, panel members said that they were requiring a vaccine because that allowed poor people to get it free. The whole thing seemed as if it were just serving the interests of the drug companies. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:42, 8 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Can someone please provide a citation for the statement that meetings are not public? The CDC says that ACIP meetings are open to the public[https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/register.html], could you clarify what meetings aren't? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:43, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vaccines do cause autism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least, they do in monkeys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Setrace|Setrace]] 11:41 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under controversy, there is a contradiction: &amp;quot;The sharp rise in autism, which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.[12]&amp;quot; but source 12 explicitly says vaccines don't cause autism. I removed this sentence and source, but is was put back with instructions to discuss it on the talk page. Something needs to be done about this contradiction. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:12, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a contradiction.  Citations are for facts set forth in the source, not baseless opinion that might appear in them.  Nobody has disproved that vaccines increase autism, and it's silly to pretend otherwise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:28, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim that vaccines don't cause autism is a claim of fact, it may be false, but it is not an opinion. We need to find a source that says vaccines cause autism if that is going to be stated in the article, if reliable sources say vaccines don't cause autism, then we should say that in the article. also, healthline seems more like a news source than a scientific source, per the MOS, shouldn't we find a better source anyway? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:52, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Asserting that vaccines don't cause autism is an opinion.  Realistically, no set of facts could prove it.  Devise an experiment that proves such an assertion and a [[Nobel Prize]] might be granted for it.  The citation is simply for the fact that &amp;quot;the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.&amp;quot;  That is a fact worth supporting by citation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:28, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here is a couple articles from one random source which state it from this view, that they do cause the disorder: &lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/16/how-much-do-you-know-about-vaccine-safety.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/11/vaccine-safety-greater-good.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are plenty of these, as well as some actual medical studies.  If you could find one of those studies, that would be great. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::There are studies both saying vaccines do cause autism, and studies saying they don't. Any one study is not necessarily right, reviews of many studies are better, but I have only found independent reviews about the MMR, these say it dosen't cause autism, but doesn't address any of the other vaccines (one of them said insufficient evidence do tell one way or the other for Dtap&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Why don't we say MMR dosen't cause autism but present whether other vaccines cause autism as an unresolved controversy? (unless someone can find more data, I'm still looking) [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 22:56, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Here [http://www.cochrane.org/CD004407/ARI_using-combined-vaccine-protection-children-against-measles-mumps-and-rubella] is a link to the summary of an independent review of the MMR that says the researchers could not find a connection between MMR and autism but that many of the safety studies were poor. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:10, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And here is an independent review that says there is no good data on whether Dtap causes autism[https://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/12#545] but that MMR probably dosen't[https://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/6#144]. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:19, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421133</id>
		<title>Talk:Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421133"/>
		<updated>2018-05-10T03:43:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* vaccine panels */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm surprised. This is an acceptable article. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. it is.  It actually tells me something.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blaylock Wellness Report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter; it has &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Discover &amp;quot;the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome&amp;quot;? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:12, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gardasil ==&lt;br /&gt;
The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. I'm going to remove this bullet. -- [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bullet has been restored. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, 22 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are '''unknown''' - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though; since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:36, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the [[Hippocratic Oath]]: ''Never bring harm upon anyone.'' In latin, ''primum non nocere''. First of all, do no harm. By that standard, a physician who does ''anything'' to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. But modern [[medicine]] has forgotten that lesson and in that manner has gone completely off the rails. And Gardasil is a prime example.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This detracts from the point that I haven't seen what the &amp;quot;link&amp;quot; is - i.e. the cited article is a secondary source and therefore not strong enough to justify the statement in this article regarding vaccines.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Oath also mentions not cutting out stones as well.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In all seriousness, it is simply impossible to verify the safety of any drugs completely before phase IV clinical trials - meaning after the drugs has been marketed. Unless you test the drug on every single person on earth and obtain a reading on it, no drug is &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;. Patient care is always riddled with uncertainty - and if physicians waits until he's 100% all the time, they'd actually do more harm to patients by their inaction. That's when professional judgment and experience comes in.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And to bring this back to our original discussion about _this_ article - all drugs have adverse reactions. Stating that Gardasil &amp;quot;has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration&amp;quot; from a news article (as opposed to a medical journal) is just a cheap, baseless way of attacking vaccines. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:08, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you give that drug to ''your'' daughter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've read medical journals. They are not the platinum standard of scientific inquiry that you believe them to be. I have personally seen ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' duped big-time by someone&amp;amp;mdash;at [[Duke University]], no less&amp;amp;mdash;pulling a total dry-lab job. Imagine the mortification of the senior professor who signed off on that person's papers, and even put his name on them, when he found out ''years later'' what a puerile fraud his student had been, and had to issue retractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I have seen other things get into ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' from &amp;quot;investigators&amp;quot; who were all on drug-company payrolls. I cite [[RU-486]] as a prime example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And that's just one journal, a journal that I might add already had developed an unsavory reputation among teaching-hospital staffers, from the chairman level through the attending level and on down to the residents, for scholarship that was less than sterling. I cannot even repeat their toilet-humor pun on the journal's name&amp;amp;mdash;at least, not here I can't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those who comment on, and especially those who make, public policy would be a lot more effective if they would just do a little bit of critical reading every now and then.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, I'm trying to improve the validity of this article by analyzing the references, not arguing for or against the efficacy or hazards of the vaccine. Why do you ask me whether I'd give the vaccine to my daughter? Unless my answer is going to be part of this article, it is absolutely irrelevant. (For your information, I do not have any children, and if I had a daughter I will not give her the shot before the age of 16. When she's reached that age she'll make her own decision regarding the shot.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you cite a primary source, it'd remove any potential bias that inherently exists in secondary sources. All I've been trying to say is that you should read that news article with the same attitude as you should with medical journals - with a grain of salt. Especially given the gravity of the statement - that the deaths has been linked to the vaccine - I believe we need something a little more than a news article. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 22:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The article gives some damaging evidence of a correlation. And while correlation does not equal causation, those quoted as denying the causal link would be motivated frankly to lie about the causal link. They include the manufacturer and a health-authority bureaucrat who wants to protect the justification of his mandate and budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I asked you whether you'd give your daughter the shot, if you had one, because I wanted to put the matter into a perspective that, all too often, public policymakers ignore. I appreciate your stepping up to the plate&amp;amp;mdash;though if you want the advice of one who once associated with the white smocks on a regular basis, I'd say that the time to safeguard any young woman from the hazards either of the shot or the thing that the shot is supposed (har-de-har-har) to protect against is about ten years ''earlier'' than any age of hypothetical &amp;quot;emancipation.&amp;quot; This after-the-fact pilltaking and muscle-jabbing and mainlining that doctors recommend these days is doing nothing to treat the underlying causes of sickness and, in my opinion as an &amp;quot;expert emeritus,&amp;quot; is making our society even sicker.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:00, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DouglasA. I am not 'pushing a socialist agenda' I am pointing out the facts. If THIS contradicts YOUR agenda then it is not my problem. The article originally cited makes no mention whatsoever of MMR which is exactly the topic under discussion in that section. That article may have in the NHS page but not here. To try and extend the point being made by the referenced article to MMR is purely speculation on your part and has no logical basis. However, it has been documented countless times that the decrease in MMR uptake is due to parents having opted out given the debunked claims over its links with autism. The reference I provided DOES actually mention MMR unlike the original. And as someone living in the UK I can tell you that there is no end of attempts by hte NHS to increase MMR uptake. You obviously don't approve of a socialized healthcare system, but to extend this to making purely speculative criticisms and claiming them as fact is uncalled for. There are valid criticisms of the NHS to be made, but this is not one of them. Is it so difficult to accept that even a system you so fundamentally disagree with has its advantages and is actually working to benefit people in this case? [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:30, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DWiggins, if you please, can you find other sources that bolster your claim about no autism/vaccination link, such as papers from the scientific community?  They would be better references than a single newspaper report.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:39, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The link was long ago debunked as it says even on this very article! My point is not a question of whether the link is real, but that the supposed link is the reason why there has been a decrease in MMR uptake. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:41, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you better read this article [http://www.naturalnews.com/011764_mercury_thimerosal_vaccines.html], because there may not be an autism link within the vaccination's actual medical content, but there is a definate link between autism and [[thimerosal]], which contains 49% mercury.  Remember the &amp;quot;Mad Hatter&amp;quot; from ''Alice in Wonderland''?  Based on fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I took out the &amp;quot;now debunked&amp;quot; line.  I think that it reads to nearly everyone's satisfaction now.  Does the MMR vaccine contain thimerosal?  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::According to this, it doesn't. [http://www.nfid.org/pdf/factsheets/thimerosal.pdf] --12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well i'm afraid Karajou that the article you provided is by no means whatsoever an authoritative source. There is consensus in the scientific community that there is no link between thimerosal and autism. To quote but another news article is simply missing the point. In large part it was the media that was to blame in stirring up this nonsense, whereas the science gave them no reason to. Take for example these two (of countless) examples which give a pretty thorough overview of the science behind the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17168158&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both dismiss a casual link between the chemical and autism, and show that there is no evidence in the scientific literature to support such a link. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DWiggins, the source I provided quotes from the pages of peer-reviewed papers from medical doctors, which means there is no consensus, as you claimed.  Since you missed reading them, I have posted them here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal&lt;br /&gt;
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system. &lt;br /&gt;
'''What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two! &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism. &lt;br /&gt;
'''A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a &amp;quot;development disability',&amp;quot; according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. &amp;quot;This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses &amp;quot;may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So not to try to revive a dead topic or anything, but today ''The Lancet'' fully and officially retracted the article it originally published that found the link between the MMR vaccine and Autism (I know the link is from a liberal website, but I feel like it's hard news so it's okay): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/emthe-lancetem-retracted_b_447341.html -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 10:46, 3 February 2010 (EST) (This is irrelevant, but I thought it was neat that the reCaptcha thing it's making me type to put the link in is &amp;quot;Caduceus&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NHS and vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::DouglasA by rejecting my edit and reinstating the original you were making such a claim. And the miseducation is not caused BY the NHS. The NHS has consistently rejected the claims about a link between autism and MMR. Again, just because you disagree with the concept of the NHS does not mean everything they do is bad wrong. I do not think anyone who knows anything about the NHS could ever argue they have not consistently tried to increase MMR uptake. By all means add that original article about costs and medicines, but you cannot simply link that to this MMR issue when there is nothing in that article to support this leap between two separate issues, and when in fact the evidence contradicts it in the case of MMR. By all means take out the bit about the promotion of the vaccine by the NHS, I put it in to counter the original false claims that the decrease in uptake was entirely the fault of the NHS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In regards to the above section, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of 'consensus'. Consensus is rarely unanimous, especially in fields so large as medicine. Consensus is the vast majority accepting something, and that is the case with the MMR vaccine and the supposed links to autism, which have been thoroughly rejected. Of course there will always be some who disagree, and unfortunately in a few cases, as with Dr. Wakefield, this disagreement is not all that it seems on the surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let's be clear about this. All the reviews of the scientific literature come out with the same conclusion. There is NO evidence to support a casual link between either thiomersal and autism, nor the MMR vaccine and autism. May I also request that you do not try and mix two separate issues together. The article cited originally concerning costs and medicine provision is not related to the MMR issue or any vaccine issue. It has no place in ''this'' article, though it may do elsewhere. I think that is the fundamental issue here, the issue of the links with autism is already discussed in the article itself where it is stated that there is no evidence.[[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 15:03, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DWiggins, a vast majority agreeing on something - a ''consensus'' - still doesn't make their position ''right'' as opposed to ''wrong''.  A vast ''consensus'' of people in the United States viewed slavery as ''right'' at one time in our history; were they correct in believing so?  No.  So how can a consensus of doctors be correct in viewing that there's no vaccination link to autism, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that mercury in a human body (as in thimerosal) does bad things?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:48, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I never said it 'makes their position right'. And in using the slavery example you are mixing up science and ethics. What is 'right' from a scientific point of view is something that has not yet been falsified, so it is perhaps better to say 'provisionally accepted' (please see my post on the Noah's Ark page I have recently made concerning the scientific method). The slavery example is a question of whether someone views slavery as morally 'right'. Of course to virtually everyone today the answer seems obvious, it is not. But as you say in the past this was not so simple, and many people saw it the opposite way. Our judgement of these people and their actions is retrospective, of course we view them as wrong, but they evidently believed they were right. Anyway, that is just an aside, since it is not relevant to the question of scientific proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It has been shown time and time again, through application of the scientific method that there is no casual link between MMR or thiomersal and autism. All claims otherwise have since been falsified, as such, the only logical conclusion that can currently be reached is that there is no such link. And you are also getting mixed up with your biochemistry. Yes, mercury is toxic. But thiomersal is not mercury, it is a compound containing the element. The pseudoscience behind the supposed link is that it has mercury, therefore it must be toxic, as if the mercury component jsut spontaneously separates from the rest of the compound in the human body. There is NO evidence to support a link between thiomersal and autism. I don't know how many more times it needs to be stated, by either me, or those men and women wearing the white coats who have investigated this time and time again. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Another aside: So there's no connection or relevence between scientific proof, the scientific method, and morality?  Thanks for clearing that up.  The Nazi Doctors must've had, as you say, provisionally accepted truth.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 06:52, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well now that I'm back I can address that point. You appear to have muddled the issues up a bit. I was not passing moral judgement on scientific discoveries, I was simply saying that a scientific 'truth' is not the same as a moral 'truth'. What the Nazi 'doctors' were doing was not even science, it was just butchery with the name science applied to it. Science can tell us what something is/how something works. It cannot tell us whether we should do something, though it can form a platform from which to make such decisions. Of course there's a connection between science and morality, but the scientific method is not a method of judging whether something is morally right or wrong, morality comes in when deciding how to use the results of scientific enquiry. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 19:28, 24 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's explore the connection between vaccines and STDs.&lt;br /&gt;
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPVSupplement99.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
HPV causes 99.7 percent of cervical cancer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=10451482]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what would be the motivation of giving young teenage girls a vaccine against HPV? Aren't we telling our daughters that it's okay to abandon God's plan (of chastity before marriage) and indulge in a little experimental fornication? &amp;quot;Hey, we're protecting you so nothing bad will happen.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:21, 21 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And when they say 'teenage' girls they don't mean 19 year old young adults, they mean 13 year old CHILDREN!  When such young people see what they see as authority figures (ie doctors) giving them the green light to indulge in promiscuous, dangerous behaviour, what are they going to think? [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 13:39, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flu Vaccine Updates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be included that influenza vaccine must be updated every year because the influenza virus evolves so readily? Or is this fact contrary to the worldview of this encyclopaedia?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know if &amp;quot;evolve&amp;quot; is the right term to use here. The influenza virus &amp;quot;mutates&amp;quot; (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Andrew Wakefield ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== vaccine panels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives. The meetings are not open to the public. They do not usually do much analysis, and tend to recommend whatever vaccines are available''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement throws out some pretty big accusations.  I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is even remotely true.   I'll give it a few days and if no-one finds a credible source then it'll be removed.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:53, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It is all true. What part do you doubt? The CDC regularly publishes the vaccine recommendations, and you can see much of this for yourself in those published reports. They have to grant waivers to the panel members to bypass govt conflict-of-interest laws. I agree that citations are needed, but please don't remove it unless you find some evidence that it is false. If it were false, it should be obvious from those CDC reports. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:48, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I doubt most of it actually.  I suppose I need to take a small step back and admit that all my experience dealing with Pharmaceuticals and vaccines comes from dealing (in a legal advisory capacity) with Pharmac which is the NZ regulatory and funding board for all medicines and treatments, I'm not familiar with the US experience.  Having said that, I know that the amount of scrutiny and participation by the public is very extensive.  In fact I have often heard people who work at Pharmac say that there is far too much consultation and attention paid to consumer groups and other groups who come from a strictly less than medical cost/benefit analysis.  I won't remove it because I accept that you might have some expertise in this area, but I do suggest we tighten up the wording a little.  At the moment the paragraph makes us appear angry and slightly conspiratorial, not learned critics of a flawed system.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:00, 6 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I followed this more about 10 years ago. I tried to get minutes of the meetings. I got some partial ones, but they were not posted in the internet, and they said that some could not be released because trade secret drug industry info was discussed. From what I got, there was no serious analysis. In one case, panel members said that they were requiring a vaccine because that allowed poor people to get it free. The whole thing seemed as if it were just serving the interests of the drug companies. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:42, 8 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Can someone please provide a citation for this sentence? The CDC says that ACIP meetings are open to the public[https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/register.html], could you clarify what meetings aren't? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:43, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vaccines do cause autism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least, they do in monkeys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Setrace|Setrace]] 11:41 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under controversy, there is a contradiction: &amp;quot;The sharp rise in autism, which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.[12]&amp;quot; but source 12 explicitly says vaccines don't cause autism. I removed this sentence and source, but is was put back with instructions to discuss it on the talk page. Something needs to be done about this contradiction. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:12, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a contradiction.  Citations are for facts set forth in the source, not baseless opinion that might appear in them.  Nobody has disproved that vaccines increase autism, and it's silly to pretend otherwise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:28, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim that vaccines don't cause autism is a claim of fact, it may be false, but it is not an opinion. We need to find a source that says vaccines cause autism if that is going to be stated in the article, if reliable sources say vaccines don't cause autism, then we should say that in the article. also, healthline seems more like a news source than a scientific source, per the MOS, shouldn't we find a better source anyway? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:52, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Asserting that vaccines don't cause autism is an opinion.  Realistically, no set of facts could prove it.  Devise an experiment that proves such an assertion and a [[Nobel Prize]] might be granted for it.  The citation is simply for the fact that &amp;quot;the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.&amp;quot;  That is a fact worth supporting by citation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:28, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here is a couple articles from one random source which state it from this view, that they do cause the disorder: &lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/16/how-much-do-you-know-about-vaccine-safety.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/11/vaccine-safety-greater-good.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are plenty of these, as well as some actual medical studies.  If you could find one of those studies, that would be great. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::There are studies both saying vaccines do cause autism, and studies saying they don't. Any one study is not necessarily right, reviews of many studies are better, but I have only found independent reviews about the MMR, these say it dosen't cause autism, but doesn't address any of the other vaccines (one of them said insufficient evidence do tell one way or the other for Dtap&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Why don't we say MMR dosen't cause autism but present whether other vaccines cause autism as an unresolved controversy? (unless someone can find more data, I'm still looking) [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 22:56, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Here [http://www.cochrane.org/CD004407/ARI_using-combined-vaccine-protection-children-against-measles-mumps-and-rubella] is a link to the summary of an independent review of the MMR that says the researchers could not find a connection between MMR and autism but that many of the safety studies were poor. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:10, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And here is an independent review that says there is no good data on whether Dtap causes autism[https://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/12#545] but that MMR probably dosen't[https://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/6#144]. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:19, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421131</id>
		<title>Talk:Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421131"/>
		<updated>2018-05-10T03:19:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* contradiction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm surprised. This is an acceptable article. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. it is.  It actually tells me something.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blaylock Wellness Report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter; it has &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Discover &amp;quot;the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome&amp;quot;? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:12, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gardasil ==&lt;br /&gt;
The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. I'm going to remove this bullet. -- [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bullet has been restored. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, 22 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are '''unknown''' - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though; since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:36, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the [[Hippocratic Oath]]: ''Never bring harm upon anyone.'' In latin, ''primum non nocere''. First of all, do no harm. By that standard, a physician who does ''anything'' to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. But modern [[medicine]] has forgotten that lesson and in that manner has gone completely off the rails. And Gardasil is a prime example.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This detracts from the point that I haven't seen what the &amp;quot;link&amp;quot; is - i.e. the cited article is a secondary source and therefore not strong enough to justify the statement in this article regarding vaccines.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Oath also mentions not cutting out stones as well.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In all seriousness, it is simply impossible to verify the safety of any drugs completely before phase IV clinical trials - meaning after the drugs has been marketed. Unless you test the drug on every single person on earth and obtain a reading on it, no drug is &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;. Patient care is always riddled with uncertainty - and if physicians waits until he's 100% all the time, they'd actually do more harm to patients by their inaction. That's when professional judgment and experience comes in.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And to bring this back to our original discussion about _this_ article - all drugs have adverse reactions. Stating that Gardasil &amp;quot;has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration&amp;quot; from a news article (as opposed to a medical journal) is just a cheap, baseless way of attacking vaccines. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:08, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you give that drug to ''your'' daughter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've read medical journals. They are not the platinum standard of scientific inquiry that you believe them to be. I have personally seen ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' duped big-time by someone&amp;amp;mdash;at [[Duke University]], no less&amp;amp;mdash;pulling a total dry-lab job. Imagine the mortification of the senior professor who signed off on that person's papers, and even put his name on them, when he found out ''years later'' what a puerile fraud his student had been, and had to issue retractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I have seen other things get into ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' from &amp;quot;investigators&amp;quot; who were all on drug-company payrolls. I cite [[RU-486]] as a prime example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And that's just one journal, a journal that I might add already had developed an unsavory reputation among teaching-hospital staffers, from the chairman level through the attending level and on down to the residents, for scholarship that was less than sterling. I cannot even repeat their toilet-humor pun on the journal's name&amp;amp;mdash;at least, not here I can't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those who comment on, and especially those who make, public policy would be a lot more effective if they would just do a little bit of critical reading every now and then.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, I'm trying to improve the validity of this article by analyzing the references, not arguing for or against the efficacy or hazards of the vaccine. Why do you ask me whether I'd give the vaccine to my daughter? Unless my answer is going to be part of this article, it is absolutely irrelevant. (For your information, I do not have any children, and if I had a daughter I will not give her the shot before the age of 16. When she's reached that age she'll make her own decision regarding the shot.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you cite a primary source, it'd remove any potential bias that inherently exists in secondary sources. All I've been trying to say is that you should read that news article with the same attitude as you should with medical journals - with a grain of salt. Especially given the gravity of the statement - that the deaths has been linked to the vaccine - I believe we need something a little more than a news article. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 22:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The article gives some damaging evidence of a correlation. And while correlation does not equal causation, those quoted as denying the causal link would be motivated frankly to lie about the causal link. They include the manufacturer and a health-authority bureaucrat who wants to protect the justification of his mandate and budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I asked you whether you'd give your daughter the shot, if you had one, because I wanted to put the matter into a perspective that, all too often, public policymakers ignore. I appreciate your stepping up to the plate&amp;amp;mdash;though if you want the advice of one who once associated with the white smocks on a regular basis, I'd say that the time to safeguard any young woman from the hazards either of the shot or the thing that the shot is supposed (har-de-har-har) to protect against is about ten years ''earlier'' than any age of hypothetical &amp;quot;emancipation.&amp;quot; This after-the-fact pilltaking and muscle-jabbing and mainlining that doctors recommend these days is doing nothing to treat the underlying causes of sickness and, in my opinion as an &amp;quot;expert emeritus,&amp;quot; is making our society even sicker.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:00, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DouglasA. I am not 'pushing a socialist agenda' I am pointing out the facts. If THIS contradicts YOUR agenda then it is not my problem. The article originally cited makes no mention whatsoever of MMR which is exactly the topic under discussion in that section. That article may have in the NHS page but not here. To try and extend the point being made by the referenced article to MMR is purely speculation on your part and has no logical basis. However, it has been documented countless times that the decrease in MMR uptake is due to parents having opted out given the debunked claims over its links with autism. The reference I provided DOES actually mention MMR unlike the original. And as someone living in the UK I can tell you that there is no end of attempts by hte NHS to increase MMR uptake. You obviously don't approve of a socialized healthcare system, but to extend this to making purely speculative criticisms and claiming them as fact is uncalled for. There are valid criticisms of the NHS to be made, but this is not one of them. Is it so difficult to accept that even a system you so fundamentally disagree with has its advantages and is actually working to benefit people in this case? [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:30, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DWiggins, if you please, can you find other sources that bolster your claim about no autism/vaccination link, such as papers from the scientific community?  They would be better references than a single newspaper report.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:39, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The link was long ago debunked as it says even on this very article! My point is not a question of whether the link is real, but that the supposed link is the reason why there has been a decrease in MMR uptake. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:41, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you better read this article [http://www.naturalnews.com/011764_mercury_thimerosal_vaccines.html], because there may not be an autism link within the vaccination's actual medical content, but there is a definate link between autism and [[thimerosal]], which contains 49% mercury.  Remember the &amp;quot;Mad Hatter&amp;quot; from ''Alice in Wonderland''?  Based on fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I took out the &amp;quot;now debunked&amp;quot; line.  I think that it reads to nearly everyone's satisfaction now.  Does the MMR vaccine contain thimerosal?  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::According to this, it doesn't. [http://www.nfid.org/pdf/factsheets/thimerosal.pdf] --12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well i'm afraid Karajou that the article you provided is by no means whatsoever an authoritative source. There is consensus in the scientific community that there is no link between thimerosal and autism. To quote but another news article is simply missing the point. In large part it was the media that was to blame in stirring up this nonsense, whereas the science gave them no reason to. Take for example these two (of countless) examples which give a pretty thorough overview of the science behind the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17168158&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both dismiss a casual link between the chemical and autism, and show that there is no evidence in the scientific literature to support such a link. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DWiggins, the source I provided quotes from the pages of peer-reviewed papers from medical doctors, which means there is no consensus, as you claimed.  Since you missed reading them, I have posted them here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal&lt;br /&gt;
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system. &lt;br /&gt;
'''What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two! &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism. &lt;br /&gt;
'''A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a &amp;quot;development disability',&amp;quot; according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. &amp;quot;This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses &amp;quot;may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So not to try to revive a dead topic or anything, but today ''The Lancet'' fully and officially retracted the article it originally published that found the link between the MMR vaccine and Autism (I know the link is from a liberal website, but I feel like it's hard news so it's okay): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/emthe-lancetem-retracted_b_447341.html -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 10:46, 3 February 2010 (EST) (This is irrelevant, but I thought it was neat that the reCaptcha thing it's making me type to put the link in is &amp;quot;Caduceus&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NHS and vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::DouglasA by rejecting my edit and reinstating the original you were making such a claim. And the miseducation is not caused BY the NHS. The NHS has consistently rejected the claims about a link between autism and MMR. Again, just because you disagree with the concept of the NHS does not mean everything they do is bad wrong. I do not think anyone who knows anything about the NHS could ever argue they have not consistently tried to increase MMR uptake. By all means add that original article about costs and medicines, but you cannot simply link that to this MMR issue when there is nothing in that article to support this leap between two separate issues, and when in fact the evidence contradicts it in the case of MMR. By all means take out the bit about the promotion of the vaccine by the NHS, I put it in to counter the original false claims that the decrease in uptake was entirely the fault of the NHS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In regards to the above section, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of 'consensus'. Consensus is rarely unanimous, especially in fields so large as medicine. Consensus is the vast majority accepting something, and that is the case with the MMR vaccine and the supposed links to autism, which have been thoroughly rejected. Of course there will always be some who disagree, and unfortunately in a few cases, as with Dr. Wakefield, this disagreement is not all that it seems on the surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let's be clear about this. All the reviews of the scientific literature come out with the same conclusion. There is NO evidence to support a casual link between either thiomersal and autism, nor the MMR vaccine and autism. May I also request that you do not try and mix two separate issues together. The article cited originally concerning costs and medicine provision is not related to the MMR issue or any vaccine issue. It has no place in ''this'' article, though it may do elsewhere. I think that is the fundamental issue here, the issue of the links with autism is already discussed in the article itself where it is stated that there is no evidence.[[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 15:03, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DWiggins, a vast majority agreeing on something - a ''consensus'' - still doesn't make their position ''right'' as opposed to ''wrong''.  A vast ''consensus'' of people in the United States viewed slavery as ''right'' at one time in our history; were they correct in believing so?  No.  So how can a consensus of doctors be correct in viewing that there's no vaccination link to autism, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that mercury in a human body (as in thimerosal) does bad things?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:48, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I never said it 'makes their position right'. And in using the slavery example you are mixing up science and ethics. What is 'right' from a scientific point of view is something that has not yet been falsified, so it is perhaps better to say 'provisionally accepted' (please see my post on the Noah's Ark page I have recently made concerning the scientific method). The slavery example is a question of whether someone views slavery as morally 'right'. Of course to virtually everyone today the answer seems obvious, it is not. But as you say in the past this was not so simple, and many people saw it the opposite way. Our judgement of these people and their actions is retrospective, of course we view them as wrong, but they evidently believed they were right. Anyway, that is just an aside, since it is not relevant to the question of scientific proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It has been shown time and time again, through application of the scientific method that there is no casual link between MMR or thiomersal and autism. All claims otherwise have since been falsified, as such, the only logical conclusion that can currently be reached is that there is no such link. And you are also getting mixed up with your biochemistry. Yes, mercury is toxic. But thiomersal is not mercury, it is a compound containing the element. The pseudoscience behind the supposed link is that it has mercury, therefore it must be toxic, as if the mercury component jsut spontaneously separates from the rest of the compound in the human body. There is NO evidence to support a link between thiomersal and autism. I don't know how many more times it needs to be stated, by either me, or those men and women wearing the white coats who have investigated this time and time again. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Another aside: So there's no connection or relevence between scientific proof, the scientific method, and morality?  Thanks for clearing that up.  The Nazi Doctors must've had, as you say, provisionally accepted truth.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 06:52, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well now that I'm back I can address that point. You appear to have muddled the issues up a bit. I was not passing moral judgement on scientific discoveries, I was simply saying that a scientific 'truth' is not the same as a moral 'truth'. What the Nazi 'doctors' were doing was not even science, it was just butchery with the name science applied to it. Science can tell us what something is/how something works. It cannot tell us whether we should do something, though it can form a platform from which to make such decisions. Of course there's a connection between science and morality, but the scientific method is not a method of judging whether something is morally right or wrong, morality comes in when deciding how to use the results of scientific enquiry. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 19:28, 24 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's explore the connection between vaccines and STDs.&lt;br /&gt;
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPVSupplement99.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
HPV causes 99.7 percent of cervical cancer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=10451482]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what would be the motivation of giving young teenage girls a vaccine against HPV? Aren't we telling our daughters that it's okay to abandon God's plan (of chastity before marriage) and indulge in a little experimental fornication? &amp;quot;Hey, we're protecting you so nothing bad will happen.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:21, 21 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And when they say 'teenage' girls they don't mean 19 year old young adults, they mean 13 year old CHILDREN!  When such young people see what they see as authority figures (ie doctors) giving them the green light to indulge in promiscuous, dangerous behaviour, what are they going to think? [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 13:39, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flu Vaccine Updates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be included that influenza vaccine must be updated every year because the influenza virus evolves so readily? Or is this fact contrary to the worldview of this encyclopaedia?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know if &amp;quot;evolve&amp;quot; is the right term to use here. The influenza virus &amp;quot;mutates&amp;quot; (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Andrew Wakefield ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== vaccine panels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives. The meetings are not open to the public. They do not usually do much analysis, and tend to recommend whatever vaccines are available''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement throws out some pretty big accusations.  I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is even remotely true.   I'll give it a few days and if no-one finds a credible source then it'll be removed.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:53, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It is all true. What part do you doubt? The CDC regularly publishes the vaccine recommendations, and you can see much of this for yourself in those published reports. They have to grant waivers to the panel members to bypass govt conflict-of-interest laws. I agree that citations are needed, but please don't remove it unless you find some evidence that it is false. If it were false, it should be obvious from those CDC reports. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:48, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I doubt most of it actually.  I suppose I need to take a small step back and admit that all my experience dealing with Pharmaceuticals and vaccines comes from dealing (in a legal advisory capacity) with Pharmac which is the NZ regulatory and funding board for all medicines and treatments, I'm not familiar with the US experience.  Having said that, I know that the amount of scrutiny and participation by the public is very extensive.  In fact I have often heard people who work at Pharmac say that there is far too much consultation and attention paid to consumer groups and other groups who come from a strictly less than medical cost/benefit analysis.  I won't remove it because I accept that you might have some expertise in this area, but I do suggest we tighten up the wording a little.  At the moment the paragraph makes us appear angry and slightly conspiratorial, not learned critics of a flawed system.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:00, 6 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I followed this more about 10 years ago. I tried to get minutes of the meetings. I got some partial ones, but they were not posted in the internet, and they said that some could not be released because trade secret drug industry info was discussed. From what I got, there was no serious analysis. In one case, panel members said that they were requiring a vaccine because that allowed poor people to get it free. The whole thing seemed as if it were just serving the interests of the drug companies. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:42, 8 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vaccines do cause autism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least, they do in monkeys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Setrace|Setrace]] 11:41 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under controversy, there is a contradiction: &amp;quot;The sharp rise in autism, which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.[12]&amp;quot; but source 12 explicitly says vaccines don't cause autism. I removed this sentence and source, but is was put back with instructions to discuss it on the talk page. Something needs to be done about this contradiction. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:12, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a contradiction.  Citations are for facts set forth in the source, not baseless opinion that might appear in them.  Nobody has disproved that vaccines increase autism, and it's silly to pretend otherwise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:28, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim that vaccines don't cause autism is a claim of fact, it may be false, but it is not an opinion. We need to find a source that says vaccines cause autism if that is going to be stated in the article, if reliable sources say vaccines don't cause autism, then we should say that in the article. also, healthline seems more like a news source than a scientific source, per the MOS, shouldn't we find a better source anyway? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:52, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Asserting that vaccines don't cause autism is an opinion.  Realistically, no set of facts could prove it.  Devise an experiment that proves such an assertion and a [[Nobel Prize]] might be granted for it.  The citation is simply for the fact that &amp;quot;the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.&amp;quot;  That is a fact worth supporting by citation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:28, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here is a couple articles from one random source which state it from this view, that they do cause the disorder: &lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/16/how-much-do-you-know-about-vaccine-safety.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/11/vaccine-safety-greater-good.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are plenty of these, as well as some actual medical studies.  If you could find one of those studies, that would be great. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::There are studies both saying vaccines do cause autism, and studies saying they don't. Any one study is not necessarily right, reviews of many studies are better, but I have only found independent reviews about the MMR, these say it dosen't cause autism, but doesn't address any of the other vaccines (one of them said insufficient evidence do tell one way or the other for Dtap&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Why don't we say MMR dosen't cause autism but present whether other vaccines cause autism as an unresolved controversy? (unless someone can find more data, I'm still looking) [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 22:56, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Here [http://www.cochrane.org/CD004407/ARI_using-combined-vaccine-protection-children-against-measles-mumps-and-rubella] is a link to the summary of an independent review of the MMR that says the researchers could not find a connection between MMR and autism but that many of the safety studies were poor. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:10, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And here is an independent review that says there is no good data on whether Dtap causes autism[https://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/12#545] but that MMR probably dosen't[https://www.nap.edu/read/13164/chapter/6#144]. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:19, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1421128</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1421128"/>
		<updated>2018-05-10T03:12:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Herd Immunity in Britain */ dead link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many injuries from vaccination are admitted to by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see. The sharp rise in [[autism]], which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination; the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as [[New Jersey]] and [[North Carolina]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.healthline.com/health/autism/autism-rates-by-state#2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;The new estimate represents a 15% increase from two years prior and a 150% increase since 2000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/26/health/autism-prevalence-cdc/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can cause over-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/ethical-issues-and-vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2018/are-vaccine-ingredients-safe.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease, this is called [[herd immunity]]. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance. The difference in vaccination rates between these states is actually very slight, and usually not nearly enough to affect herd immunity.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency became seriously ill. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{dead link}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be caused by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=2067071044 General Practice Notebook - vaccine reactions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Common Misconceptions Surrounding Vaccines ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have injured many in the developing world, sometimes due to contamination in donated stale vaccines.  The vaccine was banned for over a year in Nigeria after concerns about safety were raised. The ban has since been lifted, but the vaccination rate remains low.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421126</id>
		<title>Talk:Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421126"/>
		<updated>2018-05-10T03:10:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* contradiction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm surprised. This is an acceptable article. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. it is.  It actually tells me something.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blaylock Wellness Report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter; it has &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Discover &amp;quot;the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome&amp;quot;? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:12, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gardasil ==&lt;br /&gt;
The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. I'm going to remove this bullet. -- [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bullet has been restored. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, 22 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are '''unknown''' - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though; since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:36, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the [[Hippocratic Oath]]: ''Never bring harm upon anyone.'' In latin, ''primum non nocere''. First of all, do no harm. By that standard, a physician who does ''anything'' to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. But modern [[medicine]] has forgotten that lesson and in that manner has gone completely off the rails. And Gardasil is a prime example.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This detracts from the point that I haven't seen what the &amp;quot;link&amp;quot; is - i.e. the cited article is a secondary source and therefore not strong enough to justify the statement in this article regarding vaccines.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Oath also mentions not cutting out stones as well.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In all seriousness, it is simply impossible to verify the safety of any drugs completely before phase IV clinical trials - meaning after the drugs has been marketed. Unless you test the drug on every single person on earth and obtain a reading on it, no drug is &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;. Patient care is always riddled with uncertainty - and if physicians waits until he's 100% all the time, they'd actually do more harm to patients by their inaction. That's when professional judgment and experience comes in.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And to bring this back to our original discussion about _this_ article - all drugs have adverse reactions. Stating that Gardasil &amp;quot;has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration&amp;quot; from a news article (as opposed to a medical journal) is just a cheap, baseless way of attacking vaccines. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:08, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you give that drug to ''your'' daughter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've read medical journals. They are not the platinum standard of scientific inquiry that you believe them to be. I have personally seen ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' duped big-time by someone&amp;amp;mdash;at [[Duke University]], no less&amp;amp;mdash;pulling a total dry-lab job. Imagine the mortification of the senior professor who signed off on that person's papers, and even put his name on them, when he found out ''years later'' what a puerile fraud his student had been, and had to issue retractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I have seen other things get into ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' from &amp;quot;investigators&amp;quot; who were all on drug-company payrolls. I cite [[RU-486]] as a prime example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And that's just one journal, a journal that I might add already had developed an unsavory reputation among teaching-hospital staffers, from the chairman level through the attending level and on down to the residents, for scholarship that was less than sterling. I cannot even repeat their toilet-humor pun on the journal's name&amp;amp;mdash;at least, not here I can't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those who comment on, and especially those who make, public policy would be a lot more effective if they would just do a little bit of critical reading every now and then.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, I'm trying to improve the validity of this article by analyzing the references, not arguing for or against the efficacy or hazards of the vaccine. Why do you ask me whether I'd give the vaccine to my daughter? Unless my answer is going to be part of this article, it is absolutely irrelevant. (For your information, I do not have any children, and if I had a daughter I will not give her the shot before the age of 16. When she's reached that age she'll make her own decision regarding the shot.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you cite a primary source, it'd remove any potential bias that inherently exists in secondary sources. All I've been trying to say is that you should read that news article with the same attitude as you should with medical journals - with a grain of salt. Especially given the gravity of the statement - that the deaths has been linked to the vaccine - I believe we need something a little more than a news article. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 22:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The article gives some damaging evidence of a correlation. And while correlation does not equal causation, those quoted as denying the causal link would be motivated frankly to lie about the causal link. They include the manufacturer and a health-authority bureaucrat who wants to protect the justification of his mandate and budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I asked you whether you'd give your daughter the shot, if you had one, because I wanted to put the matter into a perspective that, all too often, public policymakers ignore. I appreciate your stepping up to the plate&amp;amp;mdash;though if you want the advice of one who once associated with the white smocks on a regular basis, I'd say that the time to safeguard any young woman from the hazards either of the shot or the thing that the shot is supposed (har-de-har-har) to protect against is about ten years ''earlier'' than any age of hypothetical &amp;quot;emancipation.&amp;quot; This after-the-fact pilltaking and muscle-jabbing and mainlining that doctors recommend these days is doing nothing to treat the underlying causes of sickness and, in my opinion as an &amp;quot;expert emeritus,&amp;quot; is making our society even sicker.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:00, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DouglasA. I am not 'pushing a socialist agenda' I am pointing out the facts. If THIS contradicts YOUR agenda then it is not my problem. The article originally cited makes no mention whatsoever of MMR which is exactly the topic under discussion in that section. That article may have in the NHS page but not here. To try and extend the point being made by the referenced article to MMR is purely speculation on your part and has no logical basis. However, it has been documented countless times that the decrease in MMR uptake is due to parents having opted out given the debunked claims over its links with autism. The reference I provided DOES actually mention MMR unlike the original. And as someone living in the UK I can tell you that there is no end of attempts by hte NHS to increase MMR uptake. You obviously don't approve of a socialized healthcare system, but to extend this to making purely speculative criticisms and claiming them as fact is uncalled for. There are valid criticisms of the NHS to be made, but this is not one of them. Is it so difficult to accept that even a system you so fundamentally disagree with has its advantages and is actually working to benefit people in this case? [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:30, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DWiggins, if you please, can you find other sources that bolster your claim about no autism/vaccination link, such as papers from the scientific community?  They would be better references than a single newspaper report.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:39, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The link was long ago debunked as it says even on this very article! My point is not a question of whether the link is real, but that the supposed link is the reason why there has been a decrease in MMR uptake. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:41, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you better read this article [http://www.naturalnews.com/011764_mercury_thimerosal_vaccines.html], because there may not be an autism link within the vaccination's actual medical content, but there is a definate link between autism and [[thimerosal]], which contains 49% mercury.  Remember the &amp;quot;Mad Hatter&amp;quot; from ''Alice in Wonderland''?  Based on fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I took out the &amp;quot;now debunked&amp;quot; line.  I think that it reads to nearly everyone's satisfaction now.  Does the MMR vaccine contain thimerosal?  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::According to this, it doesn't. [http://www.nfid.org/pdf/factsheets/thimerosal.pdf] --12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well i'm afraid Karajou that the article you provided is by no means whatsoever an authoritative source. There is consensus in the scientific community that there is no link between thimerosal and autism. To quote but another news article is simply missing the point. In large part it was the media that was to blame in stirring up this nonsense, whereas the science gave them no reason to. Take for example these two (of countless) examples which give a pretty thorough overview of the science behind the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17168158&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both dismiss a casual link between the chemical and autism, and show that there is no evidence in the scientific literature to support such a link. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DWiggins, the source I provided quotes from the pages of peer-reviewed papers from medical doctors, which means there is no consensus, as you claimed.  Since you missed reading them, I have posted them here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal&lt;br /&gt;
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system. &lt;br /&gt;
'''What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two! &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism. &lt;br /&gt;
'''A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a &amp;quot;development disability',&amp;quot; according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. &amp;quot;This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses &amp;quot;may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So not to try to revive a dead topic or anything, but today ''The Lancet'' fully and officially retracted the article it originally published that found the link between the MMR vaccine and Autism (I know the link is from a liberal website, but I feel like it's hard news so it's okay): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/emthe-lancetem-retracted_b_447341.html -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 10:46, 3 February 2010 (EST) (This is irrelevant, but I thought it was neat that the reCaptcha thing it's making me type to put the link in is &amp;quot;Caduceus&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NHS and vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::DouglasA by rejecting my edit and reinstating the original you were making such a claim. And the miseducation is not caused BY the NHS. The NHS has consistently rejected the claims about a link between autism and MMR. Again, just because you disagree with the concept of the NHS does not mean everything they do is bad wrong. I do not think anyone who knows anything about the NHS could ever argue they have not consistently tried to increase MMR uptake. By all means add that original article about costs and medicines, but you cannot simply link that to this MMR issue when there is nothing in that article to support this leap between two separate issues, and when in fact the evidence contradicts it in the case of MMR. By all means take out the bit about the promotion of the vaccine by the NHS, I put it in to counter the original false claims that the decrease in uptake was entirely the fault of the NHS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In regards to the above section, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of 'consensus'. Consensus is rarely unanimous, especially in fields so large as medicine. Consensus is the vast majority accepting something, and that is the case with the MMR vaccine and the supposed links to autism, which have been thoroughly rejected. Of course there will always be some who disagree, and unfortunately in a few cases, as with Dr. Wakefield, this disagreement is not all that it seems on the surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let's be clear about this. All the reviews of the scientific literature come out with the same conclusion. There is NO evidence to support a casual link between either thiomersal and autism, nor the MMR vaccine and autism. May I also request that you do not try and mix two separate issues together. The article cited originally concerning costs and medicine provision is not related to the MMR issue or any vaccine issue. It has no place in ''this'' article, though it may do elsewhere. I think that is the fundamental issue here, the issue of the links with autism is already discussed in the article itself where it is stated that there is no evidence.[[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 15:03, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DWiggins, a vast majority agreeing on something - a ''consensus'' - still doesn't make their position ''right'' as opposed to ''wrong''.  A vast ''consensus'' of people in the United States viewed slavery as ''right'' at one time in our history; were they correct in believing so?  No.  So how can a consensus of doctors be correct in viewing that there's no vaccination link to autism, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that mercury in a human body (as in thimerosal) does bad things?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:48, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I never said it 'makes their position right'. And in using the slavery example you are mixing up science and ethics. What is 'right' from a scientific point of view is something that has not yet been falsified, so it is perhaps better to say 'provisionally accepted' (please see my post on the Noah's Ark page I have recently made concerning the scientific method). The slavery example is a question of whether someone views slavery as morally 'right'. Of course to virtually everyone today the answer seems obvious, it is not. But as you say in the past this was not so simple, and many people saw it the opposite way. Our judgement of these people and their actions is retrospective, of course we view them as wrong, but they evidently believed they were right. Anyway, that is just an aside, since it is not relevant to the question of scientific proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It has been shown time and time again, through application of the scientific method that there is no casual link between MMR or thiomersal and autism. All claims otherwise have since been falsified, as such, the only logical conclusion that can currently be reached is that there is no such link. And you are also getting mixed up with your biochemistry. Yes, mercury is toxic. But thiomersal is not mercury, it is a compound containing the element. The pseudoscience behind the supposed link is that it has mercury, therefore it must be toxic, as if the mercury component jsut spontaneously separates from the rest of the compound in the human body. There is NO evidence to support a link between thiomersal and autism. I don't know how many more times it needs to be stated, by either me, or those men and women wearing the white coats who have investigated this time and time again. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Another aside: So there's no connection or relevence between scientific proof, the scientific method, and morality?  Thanks for clearing that up.  The Nazi Doctors must've had, as you say, provisionally accepted truth.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 06:52, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well now that I'm back I can address that point. You appear to have muddled the issues up a bit. I was not passing moral judgement on scientific discoveries, I was simply saying that a scientific 'truth' is not the same as a moral 'truth'. What the Nazi 'doctors' were doing was not even science, it was just butchery with the name science applied to it. Science can tell us what something is/how something works. It cannot tell us whether we should do something, though it can form a platform from which to make such decisions. Of course there's a connection between science and morality, but the scientific method is not a method of judging whether something is morally right or wrong, morality comes in when deciding how to use the results of scientific enquiry. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 19:28, 24 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's explore the connection between vaccines and STDs.&lt;br /&gt;
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPVSupplement99.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
HPV causes 99.7 percent of cervical cancer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=10451482]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what would be the motivation of giving young teenage girls a vaccine against HPV? Aren't we telling our daughters that it's okay to abandon God's plan (of chastity before marriage) and indulge in a little experimental fornication? &amp;quot;Hey, we're protecting you so nothing bad will happen.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:21, 21 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And when they say 'teenage' girls they don't mean 19 year old young adults, they mean 13 year old CHILDREN!  When such young people see what they see as authority figures (ie doctors) giving them the green light to indulge in promiscuous, dangerous behaviour, what are they going to think? [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 13:39, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flu Vaccine Updates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be included that influenza vaccine must be updated every year because the influenza virus evolves so readily? Or is this fact contrary to the worldview of this encyclopaedia?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know if &amp;quot;evolve&amp;quot; is the right term to use here. The influenza virus &amp;quot;mutates&amp;quot; (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Andrew Wakefield ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== vaccine panels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives. The meetings are not open to the public. They do not usually do much analysis, and tend to recommend whatever vaccines are available''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement throws out some pretty big accusations.  I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is even remotely true.   I'll give it a few days and if no-one finds a credible source then it'll be removed.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:53, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It is all true. What part do you doubt? The CDC regularly publishes the vaccine recommendations, and you can see much of this for yourself in those published reports. They have to grant waivers to the panel members to bypass govt conflict-of-interest laws. I agree that citations are needed, but please don't remove it unless you find some evidence that it is false. If it were false, it should be obvious from those CDC reports. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:48, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I doubt most of it actually.  I suppose I need to take a small step back and admit that all my experience dealing with Pharmaceuticals and vaccines comes from dealing (in a legal advisory capacity) with Pharmac which is the NZ regulatory and funding board for all medicines and treatments, I'm not familiar with the US experience.  Having said that, I know that the amount of scrutiny and participation by the public is very extensive.  In fact I have often heard people who work at Pharmac say that there is far too much consultation and attention paid to consumer groups and other groups who come from a strictly less than medical cost/benefit analysis.  I won't remove it because I accept that you might have some expertise in this area, but I do suggest we tighten up the wording a little.  At the moment the paragraph makes us appear angry and slightly conspiratorial, not learned critics of a flawed system.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:00, 6 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I followed this more about 10 years ago. I tried to get minutes of the meetings. I got some partial ones, but they were not posted in the internet, and they said that some could not be released because trade secret drug industry info was discussed. From what I got, there was no serious analysis. In one case, panel members said that they were requiring a vaccine because that allowed poor people to get it free. The whole thing seemed as if it were just serving the interests of the drug companies. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:42, 8 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vaccines do cause autism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least, they do in monkeys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Setrace|Setrace]] 11:41 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under controversy, there is a contradiction: &amp;quot;The sharp rise in autism, which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.[12]&amp;quot; but source 12 explicitly says vaccines don't cause autism. I removed this sentence and source, but is was put back with instructions to discuss it on the talk page. Something needs to be done about this contradiction. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:12, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a contradiction.  Citations are for facts set forth in the source, not baseless opinion that might appear in them.  Nobody has disproved that vaccines increase autism, and it's silly to pretend otherwise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:28, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim that vaccines don't cause autism is a claim of fact, it may be false, but it is not an opinion. We need to find a source that says vaccines cause autism if that is going to be stated in the article, if reliable sources say vaccines don't cause autism, then we should say that in the article. also, healthline seems more like a news source than a scientific source, per the MOS, shouldn't we find a better source anyway? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:52, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Asserting that vaccines don't cause autism is an opinion.  Realistically, no set of facts could prove it.  Devise an experiment that proves such an assertion and a [[Nobel Prize]] might be granted for it.  The citation is simply for the fact that &amp;quot;the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.&amp;quot;  That is a fact worth supporting by citation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:28, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here is a couple articles from one random source which state it from this view, that they do cause the disorder: &lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/16/how-much-do-you-know-about-vaccine-safety.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/11/vaccine-safety-greater-good.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are plenty of these, as well as some actual medical studies.  If you could find one of those studies, that would be great. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::There are studies both saying vaccines do cause autism, and studies saying they don't. Any one study is not necessarily right, reviews of many studies are better, but I have only found independent reviews about the MMR, these say it dosen't cause autism, but doesn't address any of the other vaccines (one of them said insufficient evidence do tell one way or the other for Dtap&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Why don't we say MMR dosen't cause autism but present whether other vaccines cause autism as an unresolved controversy? (unless someone can find more data, I'm still looking) [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 22:56, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Here [http://www.cochrane.org/CD004407/ARI_using-combined-vaccine-protection-children-against-measles-mumps-and-rubella] is a link to the summary of an independent review of the MMR that says the researchers could not find a connection between MMR and autism but that many of the safety studies were poor. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:10, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tornado&amp;diff=1421125</id>
		<title>Tornado</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tornado&amp;diff=1421125"/>
		<updated>2018-05-10T03:06:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: update scale&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A '''tornado''' is a violent rotating column of [[air]] extending from a [[thunderstorm]] to the ground. The most violent tornadoes are capable of tremendous destruction with [[wind]] speeds of up to 300&amp;amp;nbsp;mph. They can destroy large [[architecture]], uproot [[tree]]s and hurl [[car]]s hundreds of yards. They can also drive straw into trees. Damage paths can be in excess of one mile wide to 50 miles long. In an average year, over 1000 tornadoes are reported nationwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tornado Physics==&lt;br /&gt;
Before thunderstorms develop, a change in wind direction and an increase in wind speed with increasing height creates an invisible, horizontal spinning effect in the lower [[atmosphere]]. Rising air within the updraft tilts the rotating air from horizontal to vertical. An area of rotation, 2–6 miles wide, now extends through much of the storm. Most strong and violent tornadoes form within this area of strong rotation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;800&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin-left:5px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: tan  no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Enhanced Fujita (EF) tornado scale&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;100&amp;quot; | Category&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;100&amp;quot; | Maximum Wind Speed (mph)&lt;br /&gt;
! width=&amp;quot;400&amp;quot; | Damage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| '''EF-0'''&lt;br /&gt;
| 65-85&lt;br /&gt;
| Light damage to signs, chimneys; pushing-over of shallow-rooted trees and the breaking of tree branches, more severe damage to mobil homes, possibly including complete destruction, may occur.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| '''EF-1'''&lt;br /&gt;
| 86-110&lt;br /&gt;
| Moderate damage; autos pushed from roads, trees snapped or uprooted, mobile homes pushed from foundations or destroyed.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| '''EF-2'''&lt;br /&gt;
| 111-135&lt;br /&gt;
| Considerable damage. Roofs torn off frame houses; mobile homes demolished; boxcars pushed over; light-object missiles generated.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| '''EF-3'''&lt;br /&gt;
| 136-165&lt;br /&gt;
| Severe damage. Roofs and some walls torn off well-constructed houses; trains overturned; most trees uprooted; vehicles lifted off ground and thrown and large missiles generated from debris.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| '''EF-4'''&lt;br /&gt;
| 166-200&lt;br /&gt;
| Devastating damage. Well-constructed houses leveled; structure with weak foundation blown off some distance; all vehicles thrown.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| '''EF-5'''&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;gt;200&lt;br /&gt;
| Catastrophic damage. Strong-frame houses completely destroyed with debris scattered downwind, leaving an exposed foundation; automobile-sized missiles fly through the air in excess of 100 yards; small towns within the damage path are leveled.&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Occurrence==&lt;br /&gt;
Tornadoes can happen at any time of the [[year]] and at any time of the [[day]]. In the southern states, peak tornado season is from [[April]] through [[June]]. Peak times for tornadoes in the northern states are during the [[summer]]. A few southern states have a second peak time for tornado outbreaks in the fall. Tornadoes are most likely to occur between 1 p.m. and 7 p.m.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Meteorology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421122</id>
		<title>Talk:Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421122"/>
		<updated>2018-05-10T02:57:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* contradiction */ fmt&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm surprised. This is an acceptable article. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. it is.  It actually tells me something.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blaylock Wellness Report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter; it has &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Discover &amp;quot;the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome&amp;quot;? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:12, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gardasil ==&lt;br /&gt;
The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. I'm going to remove this bullet. -- [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bullet has been restored. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, 22 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are '''unknown''' - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though; since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:36, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the [[Hippocratic Oath]]: ''Never bring harm upon anyone.'' In latin, ''primum non nocere''. First of all, do no harm. By that standard, a physician who does ''anything'' to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. But modern [[medicine]] has forgotten that lesson and in that manner has gone completely off the rails. And Gardasil is a prime example.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This detracts from the point that I haven't seen what the &amp;quot;link&amp;quot; is - i.e. the cited article is a secondary source and therefore not strong enough to justify the statement in this article regarding vaccines.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Oath also mentions not cutting out stones as well.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In all seriousness, it is simply impossible to verify the safety of any drugs completely before phase IV clinical trials - meaning after the drugs has been marketed. Unless you test the drug on every single person on earth and obtain a reading on it, no drug is &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;. Patient care is always riddled with uncertainty - and if physicians waits until he's 100% all the time, they'd actually do more harm to patients by their inaction. That's when professional judgment and experience comes in.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And to bring this back to our original discussion about _this_ article - all drugs have adverse reactions. Stating that Gardasil &amp;quot;has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration&amp;quot; from a news article (as opposed to a medical journal) is just a cheap, baseless way of attacking vaccines. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:08, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you give that drug to ''your'' daughter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've read medical journals. They are not the platinum standard of scientific inquiry that you believe them to be. I have personally seen ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' duped big-time by someone&amp;amp;mdash;at [[Duke University]], no less&amp;amp;mdash;pulling a total dry-lab job. Imagine the mortification of the senior professor who signed off on that person's papers, and even put his name on them, when he found out ''years later'' what a puerile fraud his student had been, and had to issue retractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I have seen other things get into ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' from &amp;quot;investigators&amp;quot; who were all on drug-company payrolls. I cite [[RU-486]] as a prime example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And that's just one journal, a journal that I might add already had developed an unsavory reputation among teaching-hospital staffers, from the chairman level through the attending level and on down to the residents, for scholarship that was less than sterling. I cannot even repeat their toilet-humor pun on the journal's name&amp;amp;mdash;at least, not here I can't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those who comment on, and especially those who make, public policy would be a lot more effective if they would just do a little bit of critical reading every now and then.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, I'm trying to improve the validity of this article by analyzing the references, not arguing for or against the efficacy or hazards of the vaccine. Why do you ask me whether I'd give the vaccine to my daughter? Unless my answer is going to be part of this article, it is absolutely irrelevant. (For your information, I do not have any children, and if I had a daughter I will not give her the shot before the age of 16. When she's reached that age she'll make her own decision regarding the shot.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you cite a primary source, it'd remove any potential bias that inherently exists in secondary sources. All I've been trying to say is that you should read that news article with the same attitude as you should with medical journals - with a grain of salt. Especially given the gravity of the statement - that the deaths has been linked to the vaccine - I believe we need something a little more than a news article. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 22:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The article gives some damaging evidence of a correlation. And while correlation does not equal causation, those quoted as denying the causal link would be motivated frankly to lie about the causal link. They include the manufacturer and a health-authority bureaucrat who wants to protect the justification of his mandate and budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I asked you whether you'd give your daughter the shot, if you had one, because I wanted to put the matter into a perspective that, all too often, public policymakers ignore. I appreciate your stepping up to the plate&amp;amp;mdash;though if you want the advice of one who once associated with the white smocks on a regular basis, I'd say that the time to safeguard any young woman from the hazards either of the shot or the thing that the shot is supposed (har-de-har-har) to protect against is about ten years ''earlier'' than any age of hypothetical &amp;quot;emancipation.&amp;quot; This after-the-fact pilltaking and muscle-jabbing and mainlining that doctors recommend these days is doing nothing to treat the underlying causes of sickness and, in my opinion as an &amp;quot;expert emeritus,&amp;quot; is making our society even sicker.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:00, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DouglasA. I am not 'pushing a socialist agenda' I am pointing out the facts. If THIS contradicts YOUR agenda then it is not my problem. The article originally cited makes no mention whatsoever of MMR which is exactly the topic under discussion in that section. That article may have in the NHS page but not here. To try and extend the point being made by the referenced article to MMR is purely speculation on your part and has no logical basis. However, it has been documented countless times that the decrease in MMR uptake is due to parents having opted out given the debunked claims over its links with autism. The reference I provided DOES actually mention MMR unlike the original. And as someone living in the UK I can tell you that there is no end of attempts by hte NHS to increase MMR uptake. You obviously don't approve of a socialized healthcare system, but to extend this to making purely speculative criticisms and claiming them as fact is uncalled for. There are valid criticisms of the NHS to be made, but this is not one of them. Is it so difficult to accept that even a system you so fundamentally disagree with has its advantages and is actually working to benefit people in this case? [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:30, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DWiggins, if you please, can you find other sources that bolster your claim about no autism/vaccination link, such as papers from the scientific community?  They would be better references than a single newspaper report.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:39, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The link was long ago debunked as it says even on this very article! My point is not a question of whether the link is real, but that the supposed link is the reason why there has been a decrease in MMR uptake. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:41, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you better read this article [http://www.naturalnews.com/011764_mercury_thimerosal_vaccines.html], because there may not be an autism link within the vaccination's actual medical content, but there is a definate link between autism and [[thimerosal]], which contains 49% mercury.  Remember the &amp;quot;Mad Hatter&amp;quot; from ''Alice in Wonderland''?  Based on fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I took out the &amp;quot;now debunked&amp;quot; line.  I think that it reads to nearly everyone's satisfaction now.  Does the MMR vaccine contain thimerosal?  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::According to this, it doesn't. [http://www.nfid.org/pdf/factsheets/thimerosal.pdf] --12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well i'm afraid Karajou that the article you provided is by no means whatsoever an authoritative source. There is consensus in the scientific community that there is no link between thimerosal and autism. To quote but another news article is simply missing the point. In large part it was the media that was to blame in stirring up this nonsense, whereas the science gave them no reason to. Take for example these two (of countless) examples which give a pretty thorough overview of the science behind the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17168158&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both dismiss a casual link between the chemical and autism, and show that there is no evidence in the scientific literature to support such a link. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DWiggins, the source I provided quotes from the pages of peer-reviewed papers from medical doctors, which means there is no consensus, as you claimed.  Since you missed reading them, I have posted them here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal&lt;br /&gt;
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system. &lt;br /&gt;
'''What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two! &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism. &lt;br /&gt;
'''A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a &amp;quot;development disability',&amp;quot; according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. &amp;quot;This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses &amp;quot;may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So not to try to revive a dead topic or anything, but today ''The Lancet'' fully and officially retracted the article it originally published that found the link between the MMR vaccine and Autism (I know the link is from a liberal website, but I feel like it's hard news so it's okay): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/emthe-lancetem-retracted_b_447341.html -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 10:46, 3 February 2010 (EST) (This is irrelevant, but I thought it was neat that the reCaptcha thing it's making me type to put the link in is &amp;quot;Caduceus&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NHS and vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::DouglasA by rejecting my edit and reinstating the original you were making such a claim. And the miseducation is not caused BY the NHS. The NHS has consistently rejected the claims about a link between autism and MMR. Again, just because you disagree with the concept of the NHS does not mean everything they do is bad wrong. I do not think anyone who knows anything about the NHS could ever argue they have not consistently tried to increase MMR uptake. By all means add that original article about costs and medicines, but you cannot simply link that to this MMR issue when there is nothing in that article to support this leap between two separate issues, and when in fact the evidence contradicts it in the case of MMR. By all means take out the bit about the promotion of the vaccine by the NHS, I put it in to counter the original false claims that the decrease in uptake was entirely the fault of the NHS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In regards to the above section, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of 'consensus'. Consensus is rarely unanimous, especially in fields so large as medicine. Consensus is the vast majority accepting something, and that is the case with the MMR vaccine and the supposed links to autism, which have been thoroughly rejected. Of course there will always be some who disagree, and unfortunately in a few cases, as with Dr. Wakefield, this disagreement is not all that it seems on the surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let's be clear about this. All the reviews of the scientific literature come out with the same conclusion. There is NO evidence to support a casual link between either thiomersal and autism, nor the MMR vaccine and autism. May I also request that you do not try and mix two separate issues together. The article cited originally concerning costs and medicine provision is not related to the MMR issue or any vaccine issue. It has no place in ''this'' article, though it may do elsewhere. I think that is the fundamental issue here, the issue of the links with autism is already discussed in the article itself where it is stated that there is no evidence.[[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 15:03, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DWiggins, a vast majority agreeing on something - a ''consensus'' - still doesn't make their position ''right'' as opposed to ''wrong''.  A vast ''consensus'' of people in the United States viewed slavery as ''right'' at one time in our history; were they correct in believing so?  No.  So how can a consensus of doctors be correct in viewing that there's no vaccination link to autism, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that mercury in a human body (as in thimerosal) does bad things?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:48, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I never said it 'makes their position right'. And in using the slavery example you are mixing up science and ethics. What is 'right' from a scientific point of view is something that has not yet been falsified, so it is perhaps better to say 'provisionally accepted' (please see my post on the Noah's Ark page I have recently made concerning the scientific method). The slavery example is a question of whether someone views slavery as morally 'right'. Of course to virtually everyone today the answer seems obvious, it is not. But as you say in the past this was not so simple, and many people saw it the opposite way. Our judgement of these people and their actions is retrospective, of course we view them as wrong, but they evidently believed they were right. Anyway, that is just an aside, since it is not relevant to the question of scientific proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It has been shown time and time again, through application of the scientific method that there is no casual link between MMR or thiomersal and autism. All claims otherwise have since been falsified, as such, the only logical conclusion that can currently be reached is that there is no such link. And you are also getting mixed up with your biochemistry. Yes, mercury is toxic. But thiomersal is not mercury, it is a compound containing the element. The pseudoscience behind the supposed link is that it has mercury, therefore it must be toxic, as if the mercury component jsut spontaneously separates from the rest of the compound in the human body. There is NO evidence to support a link between thiomersal and autism. I don't know how many more times it needs to be stated, by either me, or those men and women wearing the white coats who have investigated this time and time again. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Another aside: So there's no connection or relevence between scientific proof, the scientific method, and morality?  Thanks for clearing that up.  The Nazi Doctors must've had, as you say, provisionally accepted truth.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 06:52, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well now that I'm back I can address that point. You appear to have muddled the issues up a bit. I was not passing moral judgement on scientific discoveries, I was simply saying that a scientific 'truth' is not the same as a moral 'truth'. What the Nazi 'doctors' were doing was not even science, it was just butchery with the name science applied to it. Science can tell us what something is/how something works. It cannot tell us whether we should do something, though it can form a platform from which to make such decisions. Of course there's a connection between science and morality, but the scientific method is not a method of judging whether something is morally right or wrong, morality comes in when deciding how to use the results of scientific enquiry. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 19:28, 24 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's explore the connection between vaccines and STDs.&lt;br /&gt;
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPVSupplement99.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
HPV causes 99.7 percent of cervical cancer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=10451482]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what would be the motivation of giving young teenage girls a vaccine against HPV? Aren't we telling our daughters that it's okay to abandon God's plan (of chastity before marriage) and indulge in a little experimental fornication? &amp;quot;Hey, we're protecting you so nothing bad will happen.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:21, 21 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And when they say 'teenage' girls they don't mean 19 year old young adults, they mean 13 year old CHILDREN!  When such young people see what they see as authority figures (ie doctors) giving them the green light to indulge in promiscuous, dangerous behaviour, what are they going to think? [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 13:39, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flu Vaccine Updates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be included that influenza vaccine must be updated every year because the influenza virus evolves so readily? Or is this fact contrary to the worldview of this encyclopaedia?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know if &amp;quot;evolve&amp;quot; is the right term to use here. The influenza virus &amp;quot;mutates&amp;quot; (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Andrew Wakefield ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== vaccine panels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives. The meetings are not open to the public. They do not usually do much analysis, and tend to recommend whatever vaccines are available''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement throws out some pretty big accusations.  I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is even remotely true.   I'll give it a few days and if no-one finds a credible source then it'll be removed.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:53, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It is all true. What part do you doubt? The CDC regularly publishes the vaccine recommendations, and you can see much of this for yourself in those published reports. They have to grant waivers to the panel members to bypass govt conflict-of-interest laws. I agree that citations are needed, but please don't remove it unless you find some evidence that it is false. If it were false, it should be obvious from those CDC reports. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:48, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I doubt most of it actually.  I suppose I need to take a small step back and admit that all my experience dealing with Pharmaceuticals and vaccines comes from dealing (in a legal advisory capacity) with Pharmac which is the NZ regulatory and funding board for all medicines and treatments, I'm not familiar with the US experience.  Having said that, I know that the amount of scrutiny and participation by the public is very extensive.  In fact I have often heard people who work at Pharmac say that there is far too much consultation and attention paid to consumer groups and other groups who come from a strictly less than medical cost/benefit analysis.  I won't remove it because I accept that you might have some expertise in this area, but I do suggest we tighten up the wording a little.  At the moment the paragraph makes us appear angry and slightly conspiratorial, not learned critics of a flawed system.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:00, 6 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I followed this more about 10 years ago. I tried to get minutes of the meetings. I got some partial ones, but they were not posted in the internet, and they said that some could not be released because trade secret drug industry info was discussed. From what I got, there was no serious analysis. In one case, panel members said that they were requiring a vaccine because that allowed poor people to get it free. The whole thing seemed as if it were just serving the interests of the drug companies. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:42, 8 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vaccines do cause autism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least, they do in monkeys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Setrace|Setrace]] 11:41 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under controversy, there is a contradiction: &amp;quot;The sharp rise in autism, which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.[12]&amp;quot; but source 12 explicitly says vaccines don't cause autism. I removed this sentence and source, but is was put back with instructions to discuss it on the talk page. Something needs to be done about this contradiction. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:12, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a contradiction.  Citations are for facts set forth in the source, not baseless opinion that might appear in them.  Nobody has disproved that vaccines increase autism, and it's silly to pretend otherwise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:28, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim that vaccines don't cause autism is a claim of fact, it may be false, but it is not an opinion. We need to find a source that says vaccines cause autism if that is going to be stated in the article, if reliable sources say vaccines don't cause autism, then we should say that in the article. also, healthline seems more like a news source than a scientific source, per the MOS, shouldn't we find a better source anyway? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:52, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Asserting that vaccines don't cause autism is an opinion.  Realistically, no set of facts could prove it.  Devise an experiment that proves such an assertion and a [[Nobel Prize]] might be granted for it.  The citation is simply for the fact that &amp;quot;the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.&amp;quot;  That is a fact worth supporting by citation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:28, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here is a couple articles from one random source which state it from this view, that they do cause the disorder: &lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/16/how-much-do-you-know-about-vaccine-safety.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/11/vaccine-safety-greater-good.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are plenty of these, as well as some actual medical studies.  If you could find one of those studies, that would be great. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::There are studies both saying vaccines do cause autism, and studies saying they don't. Any one study is not necessarily right, reviews of many studies are better, but I have only found independent reviews about the MMR, these say it dosen't cause autism, but doesn't address any of the other vaccines (one of them said insufficient evidence do tell one way or the other for Dtap&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Why don't we say MMR dosen't cause autism but present whether other vaccines cause autism as an unresolved controversy? (unless someone can find more data, I'm still looking) [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 22:56, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421121</id>
		<title>Talk:Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421121"/>
		<updated>2018-05-10T02:56:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* contradiction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm surprised. This is an acceptable article. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. it is.  It actually tells me something.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blaylock Wellness Report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter; it has &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Discover &amp;quot;the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome&amp;quot;? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:12, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gardasil ==&lt;br /&gt;
The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. I'm going to remove this bullet. -- [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bullet has been restored. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, 22 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are '''unknown''' - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though; since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:36, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the [[Hippocratic Oath]]: ''Never bring harm upon anyone.'' In latin, ''primum non nocere''. First of all, do no harm. By that standard, a physician who does ''anything'' to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. But modern [[medicine]] has forgotten that lesson and in that manner has gone completely off the rails. And Gardasil is a prime example.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This detracts from the point that I haven't seen what the &amp;quot;link&amp;quot; is - i.e. the cited article is a secondary source and therefore not strong enough to justify the statement in this article regarding vaccines.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Oath also mentions not cutting out stones as well.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In all seriousness, it is simply impossible to verify the safety of any drugs completely before phase IV clinical trials - meaning after the drugs has been marketed. Unless you test the drug on every single person on earth and obtain a reading on it, no drug is &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;. Patient care is always riddled with uncertainty - and if physicians waits until he's 100% all the time, they'd actually do more harm to patients by their inaction. That's when professional judgment and experience comes in.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And to bring this back to our original discussion about _this_ article - all drugs have adverse reactions. Stating that Gardasil &amp;quot;has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration&amp;quot; from a news article (as opposed to a medical journal) is just a cheap, baseless way of attacking vaccines. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:08, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you give that drug to ''your'' daughter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've read medical journals. They are not the platinum standard of scientific inquiry that you believe them to be. I have personally seen ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' duped big-time by someone&amp;amp;mdash;at [[Duke University]], no less&amp;amp;mdash;pulling a total dry-lab job. Imagine the mortification of the senior professor who signed off on that person's papers, and even put his name on them, when he found out ''years later'' what a puerile fraud his student had been, and had to issue retractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I have seen other things get into ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' from &amp;quot;investigators&amp;quot; who were all on drug-company payrolls. I cite [[RU-486]] as a prime example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And that's just one journal, a journal that I might add already had developed an unsavory reputation among teaching-hospital staffers, from the chairman level through the attending level and on down to the residents, for scholarship that was less than sterling. I cannot even repeat their toilet-humor pun on the journal's name&amp;amp;mdash;at least, not here I can't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those who comment on, and especially those who make, public policy would be a lot more effective if they would just do a little bit of critical reading every now and then.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, I'm trying to improve the validity of this article by analyzing the references, not arguing for or against the efficacy or hazards of the vaccine. Why do you ask me whether I'd give the vaccine to my daughter? Unless my answer is going to be part of this article, it is absolutely irrelevant. (For your information, I do not have any children, and if I had a daughter I will not give her the shot before the age of 16. When she's reached that age she'll make her own decision regarding the shot.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you cite a primary source, it'd remove any potential bias that inherently exists in secondary sources. All I've been trying to say is that you should read that news article with the same attitude as you should with medical journals - with a grain of salt. Especially given the gravity of the statement - that the deaths has been linked to the vaccine - I believe we need something a little more than a news article. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 22:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The article gives some damaging evidence of a correlation. And while correlation does not equal causation, those quoted as denying the causal link would be motivated frankly to lie about the causal link. They include the manufacturer and a health-authority bureaucrat who wants to protect the justification of his mandate and budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I asked you whether you'd give your daughter the shot, if you had one, because I wanted to put the matter into a perspective that, all too often, public policymakers ignore. I appreciate your stepping up to the plate&amp;amp;mdash;though if you want the advice of one who once associated with the white smocks on a regular basis, I'd say that the time to safeguard any young woman from the hazards either of the shot or the thing that the shot is supposed (har-de-har-har) to protect against is about ten years ''earlier'' than any age of hypothetical &amp;quot;emancipation.&amp;quot; This after-the-fact pilltaking and muscle-jabbing and mainlining that doctors recommend these days is doing nothing to treat the underlying causes of sickness and, in my opinion as an &amp;quot;expert emeritus,&amp;quot; is making our society even sicker.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:00, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DouglasA. I am not 'pushing a socialist agenda' I am pointing out the facts. If THIS contradicts YOUR agenda then it is not my problem. The article originally cited makes no mention whatsoever of MMR which is exactly the topic under discussion in that section. That article may have in the NHS page but not here. To try and extend the point being made by the referenced article to MMR is purely speculation on your part and has no logical basis. However, it has been documented countless times that the decrease in MMR uptake is due to parents having opted out given the debunked claims over its links with autism. The reference I provided DOES actually mention MMR unlike the original. And as someone living in the UK I can tell you that there is no end of attempts by hte NHS to increase MMR uptake. You obviously don't approve of a socialized healthcare system, but to extend this to making purely speculative criticisms and claiming them as fact is uncalled for. There are valid criticisms of the NHS to be made, but this is not one of them. Is it so difficult to accept that even a system you so fundamentally disagree with has its advantages and is actually working to benefit people in this case? [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:30, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DWiggins, if you please, can you find other sources that bolster your claim about no autism/vaccination link, such as papers from the scientific community?  They would be better references than a single newspaper report.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:39, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The link was long ago debunked as it says even on this very article! My point is not a question of whether the link is real, but that the supposed link is the reason why there has been a decrease in MMR uptake. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:41, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you better read this article [http://www.naturalnews.com/011764_mercury_thimerosal_vaccines.html], because there may not be an autism link within the vaccination's actual medical content, but there is a definate link between autism and [[thimerosal]], which contains 49% mercury.  Remember the &amp;quot;Mad Hatter&amp;quot; from ''Alice in Wonderland''?  Based on fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I took out the &amp;quot;now debunked&amp;quot; line.  I think that it reads to nearly everyone's satisfaction now.  Does the MMR vaccine contain thimerosal?  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::According to this, it doesn't. [http://www.nfid.org/pdf/factsheets/thimerosal.pdf] --12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well i'm afraid Karajou that the article you provided is by no means whatsoever an authoritative source. There is consensus in the scientific community that there is no link between thimerosal and autism. To quote but another news article is simply missing the point. In large part it was the media that was to blame in stirring up this nonsense, whereas the science gave them no reason to. Take for example these two (of countless) examples which give a pretty thorough overview of the science behind the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17168158&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both dismiss a casual link between the chemical and autism, and show that there is no evidence in the scientific literature to support such a link. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DWiggins, the source I provided quotes from the pages of peer-reviewed papers from medical doctors, which means there is no consensus, as you claimed.  Since you missed reading them, I have posted them here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal&lt;br /&gt;
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system. &lt;br /&gt;
'''What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two! &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism. &lt;br /&gt;
'''A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a &amp;quot;development disability',&amp;quot; according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. &amp;quot;This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses &amp;quot;may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So not to try to revive a dead topic or anything, but today ''The Lancet'' fully and officially retracted the article it originally published that found the link between the MMR vaccine and Autism (I know the link is from a liberal website, but I feel like it's hard news so it's okay): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/emthe-lancetem-retracted_b_447341.html -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 10:46, 3 February 2010 (EST) (This is irrelevant, but I thought it was neat that the reCaptcha thing it's making me type to put the link in is &amp;quot;Caduceus&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NHS and vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::DouglasA by rejecting my edit and reinstating the original you were making such a claim. And the miseducation is not caused BY the NHS. The NHS has consistently rejected the claims about a link between autism and MMR. Again, just because you disagree with the concept of the NHS does not mean everything they do is bad wrong. I do not think anyone who knows anything about the NHS could ever argue they have not consistently tried to increase MMR uptake. By all means add that original article about costs and medicines, but you cannot simply link that to this MMR issue when there is nothing in that article to support this leap between two separate issues, and when in fact the evidence contradicts it in the case of MMR. By all means take out the bit about the promotion of the vaccine by the NHS, I put it in to counter the original false claims that the decrease in uptake was entirely the fault of the NHS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In regards to the above section, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of 'consensus'. Consensus is rarely unanimous, especially in fields so large as medicine. Consensus is the vast majority accepting something, and that is the case with the MMR vaccine and the supposed links to autism, which have been thoroughly rejected. Of course there will always be some who disagree, and unfortunately in a few cases, as with Dr. Wakefield, this disagreement is not all that it seems on the surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let's be clear about this. All the reviews of the scientific literature come out with the same conclusion. There is NO evidence to support a casual link between either thiomersal and autism, nor the MMR vaccine and autism. May I also request that you do not try and mix two separate issues together. The article cited originally concerning costs and medicine provision is not related to the MMR issue or any vaccine issue. It has no place in ''this'' article, though it may do elsewhere. I think that is the fundamental issue here, the issue of the links with autism is already discussed in the article itself where it is stated that there is no evidence.[[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 15:03, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DWiggins, a vast majority agreeing on something - a ''consensus'' - still doesn't make their position ''right'' as opposed to ''wrong''.  A vast ''consensus'' of people in the United States viewed slavery as ''right'' at one time in our history; were they correct in believing so?  No.  So how can a consensus of doctors be correct in viewing that there's no vaccination link to autism, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that mercury in a human body (as in thimerosal) does bad things?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:48, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I never said it 'makes their position right'. And in using the slavery example you are mixing up science and ethics. What is 'right' from a scientific point of view is something that has not yet been falsified, so it is perhaps better to say 'provisionally accepted' (please see my post on the Noah's Ark page I have recently made concerning the scientific method). The slavery example is a question of whether someone views slavery as morally 'right'. Of course to virtually everyone today the answer seems obvious, it is not. But as you say in the past this was not so simple, and many people saw it the opposite way. Our judgement of these people and their actions is retrospective, of course we view them as wrong, but they evidently believed they were right. Anyway, that is just an aside, since it is not relevant to the question of scientific proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It has been shown time and time again, through application of the scientific method that there is no casual link between MMR or thiomersal and autism. All claims otherwise have since been falsified, as such, the only logical conclusion that can currently be reached is that there is no such link. And you are also getting mixed up with your biochemistry. Yes, mercury is toxic. But thiomersal is not mercury, it is a compound containing the element. The pseudoscience behind the supposed link is that it has mercury, therefore it must be toxic, as if the mercury component jsut spontaneously separates from the rest of the compound in the human body. There is NO evidence to support a link between thiomersal and autism. I don't know how many more times it needs to be stated, by either me, or those men and women wearing the white coats who have investigated this time and time again. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Another aside: So there's no connection or relevence between scientific proof, the scientific method, and morality?  Thanks for clearing that up.  The Nazi Doctors must've had, as you say, provisionally accepted truth.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 06:52, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well now that I'm back I can address that point. You appear to have muddled the issues up a bit. I was not passing moral judgement on scientific discoveries, I was simply saying that a scientific 'truth' is not the same as a moral 'truth'. What the Nazi 'doctors' were doing was not even science, it was just butchery with the name science applied to it. Science can tell us what something is/how something works. It cannot tell us whether we should do something, though it can form a platform from which to make such decisions. Of course there's a connection between science and morality, but the scientific method is not a method of judging whether something is morally right or wrong, morality comes in when deciding how to use the results of scientific enquiry. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 19:28, 24 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's explore the connection between vaccines and STDs.&lt;br /&gt;
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPVSupplement99.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
HPV causes 99.7 percent of cervical cancer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=10451482]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what would be the motivation of giving young teenage girls a vaccine against HPV? Aren't we telling our daughters that it's okay to abandon God's plan (of chastity before marriage) and indulge in a little experimental fornication? &amp;quot;Hey, we're protecting you so nothing bad will happen.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:21, 21 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And when they say 'teenage' girls they don't mean 19 year old young adults, they mean 13 year old CHILDREN!  When such young people see what they see as authority figures (ie doctors) giving them the green light to indulge in promiscuous, dangerous behaviour, what are they going to think? [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 13:39, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flu Vaccine Updates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be included that influenza vaccine must be updated every year because the influenza virus evolves so readily? Or is this fact contrary to the worldview of this encyclopaedia?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know if &amp;quot;evolve&amp;quot; is the right term to use here. The influenza virus &amp;quot;mutates&amp;quot; (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Andrew Wakefield ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== vaccine panels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives. The meetings are not open to the public. They do not usually do much analysis, and tend to recommend whatever vaccines are available''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement throws out some pretty big accusations.  I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is even remotely true.   I'll give it a few days and if no-one finds a credible source then it'll be removed.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:53, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It is all true. What part do you doubt? The CDC regularly publishes the vaccine recommendations, and you can see much of this for yourself in those published reports. They have to grant waivers to the panel members to bypass govt conflict-of-interest laws. I agree that citations are needed, but please don't remove it unless you find some evidence that it is false. If it were false, it should be obvious from those CDC reports. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:48, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I doubt most of it actually.  I suppose I need to take a small step back and admit that all my experience dealing with Pharmaceuticals and vaccines comes from dealing (in a legal advisory capacity) with Pharmac which is the NZ regulatory and funding board for all medicines and treatments, I'm not familiar with the US experience.  Having said that, I know that the amount of scrutiny and participation by the public is very extensive.  In fact I have often heard people who work at Pharmac say that there is far too much consultation and attention paid to consumer groups and other groups who come from a strictly less than medical cost/benefit analysis.  I won't remove it because I accept that you might have some expertise in this area, but I do suggest we tighten up the wording a little.  At the moment the paragraph makes us appear angry and slightly conspiratorial, not learned critics of a flawed system.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:00, 6 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I followed this more about 10 years ago. I tried to get minutes of the meetings. I got some partial ones, but they were not posted in the internet, and they said that some could not be released because trade secret drug industry info was discussed. From what I got, there was no serious analysis. In one case, panel members said that they were requiring a vaccine because that allowed poor people to get it free. The whole thing seemed as if it were just serving the interests of the drug companies. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:42, 8 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vaccines do cause autism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least, they do in monkeys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Setrace|Setrace]] 11:41 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under controversy, there is a contradiction: &amp;quot;The sharp rise in autism, which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.[12]&amp;quot; but source 12 explicitly says vaccines don't cause autism. I removed this sentence and source, but is was put back with instructions to discuss it on the talk page. Something needs to be done about this contradiction. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:12, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a contradiction.  Citations are for facts set forth in the source, not baseless opinion that might appear in them.  Nobody has disproved that vaccines increase autism, and it's silly to pretend otherwise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:28, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim that vaccines don't cause autism is a claim of fact, it may be false, but it is not an opinion. We need to find a source that says vaccines cause autism if that is going to be stated in the article, if reliable sources say vaccines don't cause autism, then we should say that in the article. also, healthline seems more like a news source than a scientific source, per the MOS, shouldn't we find a better source anyway? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:52, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Asserting that vaccines don't cause autism is an opinion.  Realistically, no set of facts could prove it.  Devise an experiment that proves such an assertion and a [[Nobel Prize]] might be granted for it.  The citation is simply for the fact that &amp;quot;the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.&amp;quot;  That is a fact worth supporting by citation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:28, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here is a couple articles from one random source which state it from this view, that they do cause the disorder: &lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/16/how-much-do-you-know-about-vaccine-safety.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/11/vaccine-safety-greater-good.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are plenty of these, as well as some actual medical studies.  If you could find one of those studies, that would be great. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::There are studies both saying vaccines do cause autism, and studies saying they don't. Any one study is not necessarily right, reviews of many studies are better, but I have only found independent reviews about the MMR, these say it dosen't cause autism, but doesn't address any of the other vaccines (one of them said insufficient evidence do tell one way or the other for Dtap&lt;br /&gt;
::::Why don't we say MMR dosen't cause autism but present whether other vaccines cause autism as an unresolved controversy? (unless someone can find more data, I'm still looking) [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 22:56, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421120</id>
		<title>Talk:Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421120"/>
		<updated>2018-05-10T02:56:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* contradiction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm surprised. This is an acceptable article. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. it is.  It actually tells me something.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blaylock Wellness Report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter; it has &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Discover &amp;quot;the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome&amp;quot;? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:12, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gardasil ==&lt;br /&gt;
The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. I'm going to remove this bullet. -- [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bullet has been restored. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, 22 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are '''unknown''' - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though; since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:36, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the [[Hippocratic Oath]]: ''Never bring harm upon anyone.'' In latin, ''primum non nocere''. First of all, do no harm. By that standard, a physician who does ''anything'' to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. But modern [[medicine]] has forgotten that lesson and in that manner has gone completely off the rails. And Gardasil is a prime example.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This detracts from the point that I haven't seen what the &amp;quot;link&amp;quot; is - i.e. the cited article is a secondary source and therefore not strong enough to justify the statement in this article regarding vaccines.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Oath also mentions not cutting out stones as well.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In all seriousness, it is simply impossible to verify the safety of any drugs completely before phase IV clinical trials - meaning after the drugs has been marketed. Unless you test the drug on every single person on earth and obtain a reading on it, no drug is &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;. Patient care is always riddled with uncertainty - and if physicians waits until he's 100% all the time, they'd actually do more harm to patients by their inaction. That's when professional judgment and experience comes in.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And to bring this back to our original discussion about _this_ article - all drugs have adverse reactions. Stating that Gardasil &amp;quot;has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration&amp;quot; from a news article (as opposed to a medical journal) is just a cheap, baseless way of attacking vaccines. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:08, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you give that drug to ''your'' daughter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've read medical journals. They are not the platinum standard of scientific inquiry that you believe them to be. I have personally seen ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' duped big-time by someone&amp;amp;mdash;at [[Duke University]], no less&amp;amp;mdash;pulling a total dry-lab job. Imagine the mortification of the senior professor who signed off on that person's papers, and even put his name on them, when he found out ''years later'' what a puerile fraud his student had been, and had to issue retractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I have seen other things get into ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' from &amp;quot;investigators&amp;quot; who were all on drug-company payrolls. I cite [[RU-486]] as a prime example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And that's just one journal, a journal that I might add already had developed an unsavory reputation among teaching-hospital staffers, from the chairman level through the attending level and on down to the residents, for scholarship that was less than sterling. I cannot even repeat their toilet-humor pun on the journal's name&amp;amp;mdash;at least, not here I can't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those who comment on, and especially those who make, public policy would be a lot more effective if they would just do a little bit of critical reading every now and then.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, I'm trying to improve the validity of this article by analyzing the references, not arguing for or against the efficacy or hazards of the vaccine. Why do you ask me whether I'd give the vaccine to my daughter? Unless my answer is going to be part of this article, it is absolutely irrelevant. (For your information, I do not have any children, and if I had a daughter I will not give her the shot before the age of 16. When she's reached that age she'll make her own decision regarding the shot.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you cite a primary source, it'd remove any potential bias that inherently exists in secondary sources. All I've been trying to say is that you should read that news article with the same attitude as you should with medical journals - with a grain of salt. Especially given the gravity of the statement - that the deaths has been linked to the vaccine - I believe we need something a little more than a news article. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 22:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The article gives some damaging evidence of a correlation. And while correlation does not equal causation, those quoted as denying the causal link would be motivated frankly to lie about the causal link. They include the manufacturer and a health-authority bureaucrat who wants to protect the justification of his mandate and budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I asked you whether you'd give your daughter the shot, if you had one, because I wanted to put the matter into a perspective that, all too often, public policymakers ignore. I appreciate your stepping up to the plate&amp;amp;mdash;though if you want the advice of one who once associated with the white smocks on a regular basis, I'd say that the time to safeguard any young woman from the hazards either of the shot or the thing that the shot is supposed (har-de-har-har) to protect against is about ten years ''earlier'' than any age of hypothetical &amp;quot;emancipation.&amp;quot; This after-the-fact pilltaking and muscle-jabbing and mainlining that doctors recommend these days is doing nothing to treat the underlying causes of sickness and, in my opinion as an &amp;quot;expert emeritus,&amp;quot; is making our society even sicker.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:00, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DouglasA. I am not 'pushing a socialist agenda' I am pointing out the facts. If THIS contradicts YOUR agenda then it is not my problem. The article originally cited makes no mention whatsoever of MMR which is exactly the topic under discussion in that section. That article may have in the NHS page but not here. To try and extend the point being made by the referenced article to MMR is purely speculation on your part and has no logical basis. However, it has been documented countless times that the decrease in MMR uptake is due to parents having opted out given the debunked claims over its links with autism. The reference I provided DOES actually mention MMR unlike the original. And as someone living in the UK I can tell you that there is no end of attempts by hte NHS to increase MMR uptake. You obviously don't approve of a socialized healthcare system, but to extend this to making purely speculative criticisms and claiming them as fact is uncalled for. There are valid criticisms of the NHS to be made, but this is not one of them. Is it so difficult to accept that even a system you so fundamentally disagree with has its advantages and is actually working to benefit people in this case? [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:30, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DWiggins, if you please, can you find other sources that bolster your claim about no autism/vaccination link, such as papers from the scientific community?  They would be better references than a single newspaper report.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:39, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The link was long ago debunked as it says even on this very article! My point is not a question of whether the link is real, but that the supposed link is the reason why there has been a decrease in MMR uptake. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:41, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you better read this article [http://www.naturalnews.com/011764_mercury_thimerosal_vaccines.html], because there may not be an autism link within the vaccination's actual medical content, but there is a definate link between autism and [[thimerosal]], which contains 49% mercury.  Remember the &amp;quot;Mad Hatter&amp;quot; from ''Alice in Wonderland''?  Based on fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I took out the &amp;quot;now debunked&amp;quot; line.  I think that it reads to nearly everyone's satisfaction now.  Does the MMR vaccine contain thimerosal?  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::According to this, it doesn't. [http://www.nfid.org/pdf/factsheets/thimerosal.pdf] --12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well i'm afraid Karajou that the article you provided is by no means whatsoever an authoritative source. There is consensus in the scientific community that there is no link between thimerosal and autism. To quote but another news article is simply missing the point. In large part it was the media that was to blame in stirring up this nonsense, whereas the science gave them no reason to. Take for example these two (of countless) examples which give a pretty thorough overview of the science behind the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17168158&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both dismiss a casual link between the chemical and autism, and show that there is no evidence in the scientific literature to support such a link. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DWiggins, the source I provided quotes from the pages of peer-reviewed papers from medical doctors, which means there is no consensus, as you claimed.  Since you missed reading them, I have posted them here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal&lt;br /&gt;
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system. &lt;br /&gt;
'''What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two! &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism. &lt;br /&gt;
'''A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a &amp;quot;development disability',&amp;quot; according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. &amp;quot;This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses &amp;quot;may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So not to try to revive a dead topic or anything, but today ''The Lancet'' fully and officially retracted the article it originally published that found the link between the MMR vaccine and Autism (I know the link is from a liberal website, but I feel like it's hard news so it's okay): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/emthe-lancetem-retracted_b_447341.html -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 10:46, 3 February 2010 (EST) (This is irrelevant, but I thought it was neat that the reCaptcha thing it's making me type to put the link in is &amp;quot;Caduceus&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NHS and vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::DouglasA by rejecting my edit and reinstating the original you were making such a claim. And the miseducation is not caused BY the NHS. The NHS has consistently rejected the claims about a link between autism and MMR. Again, just because you disagree with the concept of the NHS does not mean everything they do is bad wrong. I do not think anyone who knows anything about the NHS could ever argue they have not consistently tried to increase MMR uptake. By all means add that original article about costs and medicines, but you cannot simply link that to this MMR issue when there is nothing in that article to support this leap between two separate issues, and when in fact the evidence contradicts it in the case of MMR. By all means take out the bit about the promotion of the vaccine by the NHS, I put it in to counter the original false claims that the decrease in uptake was entirely the fault of the NHS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In regards to the above section, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of 'consensus'. Consensus is rarely unanimous, especially in fields so large as medicine. Consensus is the vast majority accepting something, and that is the case with the MMR vaccine and the supposed links to autism, which have been thoroughly rejected. Of course there will always be some who disagree, and unfortunately in a few cases, as with Dr. Wakefield, this disagreement is not all that it seems on the surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let's be clear about this. All the reviews of the scientific literature come out with the same conclusion. There is NO evidence to support a casual link between either thiomersal and autism, nor the MMR vaccine and autism. May I also request that you do not try and mix two separate issues together. The article cited originally concerning costs and medicine provision is not related to the MMR issue or any vaccine issue. It has no place in ''this'' article, though it may do elsewhere. I think that is the fundamental issue here, the issue of the links with autism is already discussed in the article itself where it is stated that there is no evidence.[[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 15:03, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DWiggins, a vast majority agreeing on something - a ''consensus'' - still doesn't make their position ''right'' as opposed to ''wrong''.  A vast ''consensus'' of people in the United States viewed slavery as ''right'' at one time in our history; were they correct in believing so?  No.  So how can a consensus of doctors be correct in viewing that there's no vaccination link to autism, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that mercury in a human body (as in thimerosal) does bad things?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:48, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I never said it 'makes their position right'. And in using the slavery example you are mixing up science and ethics. What is 'right' from a scientific point of view is something that has not yet been falsified, so it is perhaps better to say 'provisionally accepted' (please see my post on the Noah's Ark page I have recently made concerning the scientific method). The slavery example is a question of whether someone views slavery as morally 'right'. Of course to virtually everyone today the answer seems obvious, it is not. But as you say in the past this was not so simple, and many people saw it the opposite way. Our judgement of these people and their actions is retrospective, of course we view them as wrong, but they evidently believed they were right. Anyway, that is just an aside, since it is not relevant to the question of scientific proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It has been shown time and time again, through application of the scientific method that there is no casual link between MMR or thiomersal and autism. All claims otherwise have since been falsified, as such, the only logical conclusion that can currently be reached is that there is no such link. And you are also getting mixed up with your biochemistry. Yes, mercury is toxic. But thiomersal is not mercury, it is a compound containing the element. The pseudoscience behind the supposed link is that it has mercury, therefore it must be toxic, as if the mercury component jsut spontaneously separates from the rest of the compound in the human body. There is NO evidence to support a link between thiomersal and autism. I don't know how many more times it needs to be stated, by either me, or those men and women wearing the white coats who have investigated this time and time again. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Another aside: So there's no connection or relevence between scientific proof, the scientific method, and morality?  Thanks for clearing that up.  The Nazi Doctors must've had, as you say, provisionally accepted truth.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 06:52, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well now that I'm back I can address that point. You appear to have muddled the issues up a bit. I was not passing moral judgement on scientific discoveries, I was simply saying that a scientific 'truth' is not the same as a moral 'truth'. What the Nazi 'doctors' were doing was not even science, it was just butchery with the name science applied to it. Science can tell us what something is/how something works. It cannot tell us whether we should do something, though it can form a platform from which to make such decisions. Of course there's a connection between science and morality, but the scientific method is not a method of judging whether something is morally right or wrong, morality comes in when deciding how to use the results of scientific enquiry. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 19:28, 24 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's explore the connection between vaccines and STDs.&lt;br /&gt;
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPVSupplement99.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
HPV causes 99.7 percent of cervical cancer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=10451482]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what would be the motivation of giving young teenage girls a vaccine against HPV? Aren't we telling our daughters that it's okay to abandon God's plan (of chastity before marriage) and indulge in a little experimental fornication? &amp;quot;Hey, we're protecting you so nothing bad will happen.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:21, 21 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And when they say 'teenage' girls they don't mean 19 year old young adults, they mean 13 year old CHILDREN!  When such young people see what they see as authority figures (ie doctors) giving them the green light to indulge in promiscuous, dangerous behaviour, what are they going to think? [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 13:39, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flu Vaccine Updates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be included that influenza vaccine must be updated every year because the influenza virus evolves so readily? Or is this fact contrary to the worldview of this encyclopaedia?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know if &amp;quot;evolve&amp;quot; is the right term to use here. The influenza virus &amp;quot;mutates&amp;quot; (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Andrew Wakefield ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== vaccine panels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives. The meetings are not open to the public. They do not usually do much analysis, and tend to recommend whatever vaccines are available''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement throws out some pretty big accusations.  I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is even remotely true.   I'll give it a few days and if no-one finds a credible source then it'll be removed.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:53, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It is all true. What part do you doubt? The CDC regularly publishes the vaccine recommendations, and you can see much of this for yourself in those published reports. They have to grant waivers to the panel members to bypass govt conflict-of-interest laws. I agree that citations are needed, but please don't remove it unless you find some evidence that it is false. If it were false, it should be obvious from those CDC reports. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:48, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I doubt most of it actually.  I suppose I need to take a small step back and admit that all my experience dealing with Pharmaceuticals and vaccines comes from dealing (in a legal advisory capacity) with Pharmac which is the NZ regulatory and funding board for all medicines and treatments, I'm not familiar with the US experience.  Having said that, I know that the amount of scrutiny and participation by the public is very extensive.  In fact I have often heard people who work at Pharmac say that there is far too much consultation and attention paid to consumer groups and other groups who come from a strictly less than medical cost/benefit analysis.  I won't remove it because I accept that you might have some expertise in this area, but I do suggest we tighten up the wording a little.  At the moment the paragraph makes us appear angry and slightly conspiratorial, not learned critics of a flawed system.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:00, 6 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I followed this more about 10 years ago. I tried to get minutes of the meetings. I got some partial ones, but they were not posted in the internet, and they said that some could not be released because trade secret drug industry info was discussed. From what I got, there was no serious analysis. In one case, panel members said that they were requiring a vaccine because that allowed poor people to get it free. The whole thing seemed as if it were just serving the interests of the drug companies. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:42, 8 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vaccines do cause autism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least, they do in monkeys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Setrace|Setrace]] 11:41 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under controversy, there is a contradiction: &amp;quot;The sharp rise in autism, which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.[12]&amp;quot; but source 12 explicitly says vaccines don't cause autism. I removed this sentence and source, but is was put back with instructions to discuss it on the talk page. Something needs to be done about this contradiction. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:12, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a contradiction.  Citations are for facts set forth in the source, not baseless opinion that might appear in them.  Nobody has disproved that vaccines increase autism, and it's silly to pretend otherwise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:28, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim that vaccines don't cause autism is a claim of fact, it may be false, but it is not an opinion. We need to find a source that says vaccines cause autism if that is going to be stated in the article, if reliable sources say vaccines don't cause autism, then we should say that in the article. also, healthline seems more like a news source than a scientific source, per the MOS, shouldn't we find a better source anyway? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:52, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Asserting that vaccines don't cause autism is an opinion.  Realistically, no set of facts could prove it.  Devise an experiment that proves such an assertion and a [[Nobel Prize]] might be granted for it.  The citation is simply for the fact that &amp;quot;the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.&amp;quot;  That is a fact worth supporting by citation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:28, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here is a couple articles from one random source which state it from this view, that they do cause the disorder: &lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/16/how-much-do-you-know-about-vaccine-safety.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/11/vaccine-safety-greater-good.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are plenty of these, as well as some actual medical studies.  If you could find one of those studies, that would be great. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::There are studies both saying vaccines do cause autism, and studies saying they don't. Any one study is not necessarily right, reviews of many studies are better, but I have only found independent reviews about the MMR, these say it dosen't cause autism, but doesn't address any of the other vaccines (one of them said insufficient evidence do tell one way or the other for Dtap&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Why don't we say MMR dosen't cause autism but present whether other vaccines cause autism as an unresolved controversy? (unless someone can find more data, I'm still looking) [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 22:56, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421119</id>
		<title>Talk:Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1421119"/>
		<updated>2018-05-10T02:56:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* contradiction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm surprised. This is an acceptable article. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. it is.  It actually tells me something.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blaylock Wellness Report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter; it has &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Discover &amp;quot;the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome&amp;quot;? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:12, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gardasil ==&lt;br /&gt;
The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. I'm going to remove this bullet. -- [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bullet has been restored. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, 22 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are '''unknown''' - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though; since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:36, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the [[Hippocratic Oath]]: ''Never bring harm upon anyone.'' In latin, ''primum non nocere''. First of all, do no harm. By that standard, a physician who does ''anything'' to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. But modern [[medicine]] has forgotten that lesson and in that manner has gone completely off the rails. And Gardasil is a prime example.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This detracts from the point that I haven't seen what the &amp;quot;link&amp;quot; is - i.e. the cited article is a secondary source and therefore not strong enough to justify the statement in this article regarding vaccines.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Oath also mentions not cutting out stones as well.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In all seriousness, it is simply impossible to verify the safety of any drugs completely before phase IV clinical trials - meaning after the drugs has been marketed. Unless you test the drug on every single person on earth and obtain a reading on it, no drug is &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;. Patient care is always riddled with uncertainty - and if physicians waits until he's 100% all the time, they'd actually do more harm to patients by their inaction. That's when professional judgment and experience comes in.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And to bring this back to our original discussion about _this_ article - all drugs have adverse reactions. Stating that Gardasil &amp;quot;has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration&amp;quot; from a news article (as opposed to a medical journal) is just a cheap, baseless way of attacking vaccines. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:08, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you give that drug to ''your'' daughter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've read medical journals. They are not the platinum standard of scientific inquiry that you believe them to be. I have personally seen ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' duped big-time by someone&amp;amp;mdash;at [[Duke University]], no less&amp;amp;mdash;pulling a total dry-lab job. Imagine the mortification of the senior professor who signed off on that person's papers, and even put his name on them, when he found out ''years later'' what a puerile fraud his student had been, and had to issue retractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I have seen other things get into ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' from &amp;quot;investigators&amp;quot; who were all on drug-company payrolls. I cite [[RU-486]] as a prime example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And that's just one journal, a journal that I might add already had developed an unsavory reputation among teaching-hospital staffers, from the chairman level through the attending level and on down to the residents, for scholarship that was less than sterling. I cannot even repeat their toilet-humor pun on the journal's name&amp;amp;mdash;at least, not here I can't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those who comment on, and especially those who make, public policy would be a lot more effective if they would just do a little bit of critical reading every now and then.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, I'm trying to improve the validity of this article by analyzing the references, not arguing for or against the efficacy or hazards of the vaccine. Why do you ask me whether I'd give the vaccine to my daughter? Unless my answer is going to be part of this article, it is absolutely irrelevant. (For your information, I do not have any children, and if I had a daughter I will not give her the shot before the age of 16. When she's reached that age she'll make her own decision regarding the shot.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you cite a primary source, it'd remove any potential bias that inherently exists in secondary sources. All I've been trying to say is that you should read that news article with the same attitude as you should with medical journals - with a grain of salt. Especially given the gravity of the statement - that the deaths has been linked to the vaccine - I believe we need something a little more than a news article. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 22:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The article gives some damaging evidence of a correlation. And while correlation does not equal causation, those quoted as denying the causal link would be motivated frankly to lie about the causal link. They include the manufacturer and a health-authority bureaucrat who wants to protect the justification of his mandate and budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I asked you whether you'd give your daughter the shot, if you had one, because I wanted to put the matter into a perspective that, all too often, public policymakers ignore. I appreciate your stepping up to the plate&amp;amp;mdash;though if you want the advice of one who once associated with the white smocks on a regular basis, I'd say that the time to safeguard any young woman from the hazards either of the shot or the thing that the shot is supposed (har-de-har-har) to protect against is about ten years ''earlier'' than any age of hypothetical &amp;quot;emancipation.&amp;quot; This after-the-fact pilltaking and muscle-jabbing and mainlining that doctors recommend these days is doing nothing to treat the underlying causes of sickness and, in my opinion as an &amp;quot;expert emeritus,&amp;quot; is making our society even sicker.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:00, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DouglasA. I am not 'pushing a socialist agenda' I am pointing out the facts. If THIS contradicts YOUR agenda then it is not my problem. The article originally cited makes no mention whatsoever of MMR which is exactly the topic under discussion in that section. That article may have in the NHS page but not here. To try and extend the point being made by the referenced article to MMR is purely speculation on your part and has no logical basis. However, it has been documented countless times that the decrease in MMR uptake is due to parents having opted out given the debunked claims over its links with autism. The reference I provided DOES actually mention MMR unlike the original. And as someone living in the UK I can tell you that there is no end of attempts by hte NHS to increase MMR uptake. You obviously don't approve of a socialized healthcare system, but to extend this to making purely speculative criticisms and claiming them as fact is uncalled for. There are valid criticisms of the NHS to be made, but this is not one of them. Is it so difficult to accept that even a system you so fundamentally disagree with has its advantages and is actually working to benefit people in this case? [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:30, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DWiggins, if you please, can you find other sources that bolster your claim about no autism/vaccination link, such as papers from the scientific community?  They would be better references than a single newspaper report.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:39, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The link was long ago debunked as it says even on this very article! My point is not a question of whether the link is real, but that the supposed link is the reason why there has been a decrease in MMR uptake. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:41, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you better read this article [http://www.naturalnews.com/011764_mercury_thimerosal_vaccines.html], because there may not be an autism link within the vaccination's actual medical content, but there is a definate link between autism and [[thimerosal]], which contains 49% mercury.  Remember the &amp;quot;Mad Hatter&amp;quot; from ''Alice in Wonderland''?  Based on fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I took out the &amp;quot;now debunked&amp;quot; line.  I think that it reads to nearly everyone's satisfaction now.  Does the MMR vaccine contain thimerosal?  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::According to this, it doesn't. [http://www.nfid.org/pdf/factsheets/thimerosal.pdf] --12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well i'm afraid Karajou that the article you provided is by no means whatsoever an authoritative source. There is consensus in the scientific community that there is no link between thimerosal and autism. To quote but another news article is simply missing the point. In large part it was the media that was to blame in stirring up this nonsense, whereas the science gave them no reason to. Take for example these two (of countless) examples which give a pretty thorough overview of the science behind the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17168158&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both dismiss a casual link between the chemical and autism, and show that there is no evidence in the scientific literature to support such a link. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DWiggins, the source I provided quotes from the pages of peer-reviewed papers from medical doctors, which means there is no consensus, as you claimed.  Since you missed reading them, I have posted them here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal&lt;br /&gt;
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system. &lt;br /&gt;
'''What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two! &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism. &lt;br /&gt;
'''A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a &amp;quot;development disability',&amp;quot; according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. &amp;quot;This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses &amp;quot;may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So not to try to revive a dead topic or anything, but today ''The Lancet'' fully and officially retracted the article it originally published that found the link between the MMR vaccine and Autism (I know the link is from a liberal website, but I feel like it's hard news so it's okay): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/emthe-lancetem-retracted_b_447341.html -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 10:46, 3 February 2010 (EST) (This is irrelevant, but I thought it was neat that the reCaptcha thing it's making me type to put the link in is &amp;quot;Caduceus&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NHS and vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::DouglasA by rejecting my edit and reinstating the original you were making such a claim. And the miseducation is not caused BY the NHS. The NHS has consistently rejected the claims about a link between autism and MMR. Again, just because you disagree with the concept of the NHS does not mean everything they do is bad wrong. I do not think anyone who knows anything about the NHS could ever argue they have not consistently tried to increase MMR uptake. By all means add that original article about costs and medicines, but you cannot simply link that to this MMR issue when there is nothing in that article to support this leap between two separate issues, and when in fact the evidence contradicts it in the case of MMR. By all means take out the bit about the promotion of the vaccine by the NHS, I put it in to counter the original false claims that the decrease in uptake was entirely the fault of the NHS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In regards to the above section, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of 'consensus'. Consensus is rarely unanimous, especially in fields so large as medicine. Consensus is the vast majority accepting something, and that is the case with the MMR vaccine and the supposed links to autism, which have been thoroughly rejected. Of course there will always be some who disagree, and unfortunately in a few cases, as with Dr. Wakefield, this disagreement is not all that it seems on the surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let's be clear about this. All the reviews of the scientific literature come out with the same conclusion. There is NO evidence to support a casual link between either thiomersal and autism, nor the MMR vaccine and autism. May I also request that you do not try and mix two separate issues together. The article cited originally concerning costs and medicine provision is not related to the MMR issue or any vaccine issue. It has no place in ''this'' article, though it may do elsewhere. I think that is the fundamental issue here, the issue of the links with autism is already discussed in the article itself where it is stated that there is no evidence.[[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 15:03, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DWiggins, a vast majority agreeing on something - a ''consensus'' - still doesn't make their position ''right'' as opposed to ''wrong''.  A vast ''consensus'' of people in the United States viewed slavery as ''right'' at one time in our history; were they correct in believing so?  No.  So how can a consensus of doctors be correct in viewing that there's no vaccination link to autism, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that mercury in a human body (as in thimerosal) does bad things?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:48, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I never said it 'makes their position right'. And in using the slavery example you are mixing up science and ethics. What is 'right' from a scientific point of view is something that has not yet been falsified, so it is perhaps better to say 'provisionally accepted' (please see my post on the Noah's Ark page I have recently made concerning the scientific method). The slavery example is a question of whether someone views slavery as morally 'right'. Of course to virtually everyone today the answer seems obvious, it is not. But as you say in the past this was not so simple, and many people saw it the opposite way. Our judgement of these people and their actions is retrospective, of course we view them as wrong, but they evidently believed they were right. Anyway, that is just an aside, since it is not relevant to the question of scientific proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It has been shown time and time again, through application of the scientific method that there is no casual link between MMR or thiomersal and autism. All claims otherwise have since been falsified, as such, the only logical conclusion that can currently be reached is that there is no such link. And you are also getting mixed up with your biochemistry. Yes, mercury is toxic. But thiomersal is not mercury, it is a compound containing the element. The pseudoscience behind the supposed link is that it has mercury, therefore it must be toxic, as if the mercury component jsut spontaneously separates from the rest of the compound in the human body. There is NO evidence to support a link between thiomersal and autism. I don't know how many more times it needs to be stated, by either me, or those men and women wearing the white coats who have investigated this time and time again. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Another aside: So there's no connection or relevence between scientific proof, the scientific method, and morality?  Thanks for clearing that up.  The Nazi Doctors must've had, as you say, provisionally accepted truth.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 06:52, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well now that I'm back I can address that point. You appear to have muddled the issues up a bit. I was not passing moral judgement on scientific discoveries, I was simply saying that a scientific 'truth' is not the same as a moral 'truth'. What the Nazi 'doctors' were doing was not even science, it was just butchery with the name science applied to it. Science can tell us what something is/how something works. It cannot tell us whether we should do something, though it can form a platform from which to make such decisions. Of course there's a connection between science and morality, but the scientific method is not a method of judging whether something is morally right or wrong, morality comes in when deciding how to use the results of scientific enquiry. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 19:28, 24 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's explore the connection between vaccines and STDs.&lt;br /&gt;
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPVSupplement99.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
HPV causes 99.7 percent of cervical cancer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=10451482]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what would be the motivation of giving young teenage girls a vaccine against HPV? Aren't we telling our daughters that it's okay to abandon God's plan (of chastity before marriage) and indulge in a little experimental fornication? &amp;quot;Hey, we're protecting you so nothing bad will happen.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:21, 21 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And when they say 'teenage' girls they don't mean 19 year old young adults, they mean 13 year old CHILDREN!  When such young people see what they see as authority figures (ie doctors) giving them the green light to indulge in promiscuous, dangerous behaviour, what are they going to think? [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 13:39, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flu Vaccine Updates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be included that influenza vaccine must be updated every year because the influenza virus evolves so readily? Or is this fact contrary to the worldview of this encyclopaedia?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know if &amp;quot;evolve&amp;quot; is the right term to use here. The influenza virus &amp;quot;mutates&amp;quot; (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Andrew Wakefield ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== vaccine panels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives. The meetings are not open to the public. They do not usually do much analysis, and tend to recommend whatever vaccines are available''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement throws out some pretty big accusations.  I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is even remotely true.   I'll give it a few days and if no-one finds a credible source then it'll be removed.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:53, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It is all true. What part do you doubt? The CDC regularly publishes the vaccine recommendations, and you can see much of this for yourself in those published reports. They have to grant waivers to the panel members to bypass govt conflict-of-interest laws. I agree that citations are needed, but please don't remove it unless you find some evidence that it is false. If it were false, it should be obvious from those CDC reports. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:48, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I doubt most of it actually.  I suppose I need to take a small step back and admit that all my experience dealing with Pharmaceuticals and vaccines comes from dealing (in a legal advisory capacity) with Pharmac which is the NZ regulatory and funding board for all medicines and treatments, I'm not familiar with the US experience.  Having said that, I know that the amount of scrutiny and participation by the public is very extensive.  In fact I have often heard people who work at Pharmac say that there is far too much consultation and attention paid to consumer groups and other groups who come from a strictly less than medical cost/benefit analysis.  I won't remove it because I accept that you might have some expertise in this area, but I do suggest we tighten up the wording a little.  At the moment the paragraph makes us appear angry and slightly conspiratorial, not learned critics of a flawed system.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:00, 6 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I followed this more about 10 years ago. I tried to get minutes of the meetings. I got some partial ones, but they were not posted in the internet, and they said that some could not be released because trade secret drug industry info was discussed. From what I got, there was no serious analysis. In one case, panel members said that they were requiring a vaccine because that allowed poor people to get it free. The whole thing seemed as if it were just serving the interests of the drug companies. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:42, 8 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vaccines do cause autism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least, they do in monkeys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Setrace|Setrace]] 11:41 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under controversy, there is a contradiction: &amp;quot;The sharp rise in autism, which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.[12]&amp;quot; but source 12 explicitly says vaccines don't cause autism. I removed this sentence and source, but is was put back with instructions to discuss it on the talk page. Something needs to be done about this contradiction. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:12, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a contradiction.  Citations are for facts set forth in the source, not baseless opinion that might appear in them.  Nobody has disproved that vaccines increase autism, and it's silly to pretend otherwise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:28, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim that vaccines don't cause autism is a claim of fact, it may be false, but it is not an opinion. We need to find a source that says vaccines cause autism if that is going to be stated in the article, if reliable sources say vaccines don't cause autism, then we should say that in the article. also, healthline seems more like a news source than a scientific source, per the MOS, shouldn't we find a better source anyway? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:52, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Asserting that vaccines don't cause autism is an opinion.  Realistically, no set of facts could prove it.  Devise an experiment that proves such an assertion and a [[Nobel Prize]] might be granted for it.  The citation is simply for the fact that &amp;quot;the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.&amp;quot;  That is a fact worth supporting by citation.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:28, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here is a couple articles from one random source which state it from this view, that they do cause the disorder: &lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/12/16/how-much-do-you-know-about-vaccine-safety.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/11/vaccine-safety-greater-good.aspx&lt;br /&gt;
::::There are plenty of these, as well as some actual medical studies.  If you could find one of those studies, that would be great. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I:::::There are studies both saying vaccines do cause autism, and studies saying they don't. Any one study is not necessarily right, reviews of many studies are better, but I have only found independent reviews about the MMR, these say it dosen't cause autism, but doesn't address any of the other vaccines (one of them said insufficient evidence do tell one way or the other for Dtap&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Why don't we say MMR dosen't cause autism but present whether other vaccines cause autism as an unresolved controversy? (unless someone can find more data, I'm still looking) [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 22:56, 9 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Herd_immunity&amp;diff=1420923</id>
		<title>Herd immunity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Herd_immunity&amp;diff=1420923"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:57:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: immunity can come from infection as well as vaccination&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Community immunity''' is having a large percentage of the population immune to a disease in order to prevent the spread of that disease infectious diseases.  Even individuals not immune are offered some protection because the disease has little opportunity to spread within the community. This is also known as herd immunity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/about/terms/glossary.htm#c&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The thresholds for herd immunity to protect against various diseases range from 85% to 94% vaccination rates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/training/overview/pdf/eradicationhistory.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1420922</id>
		<title>Talk:Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1420922"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:52:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* contradiction */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm surprised. This is an acceptable article. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. it is.  It actually tells me something.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blaylock Wellness Report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter; it has &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Discover &amp;quot;the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome&amp;quot;? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:12, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gardasil ==&lt;br /&gt;
The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. I'm going to remove this bullet. -- [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bullet has been restored. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, 22 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are '''unknown''' - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though; since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:36, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the [[Hippocratic Oath]]: ''Never bring harm upon anyone.'' In latin, ''primum non nocere''. First of all, do no harm. By that standard, a physician who does ''anything'' to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. But modern [[medicine]] has forgotten that lesson and in that manner has gone completely off the rails. And Gardasil is a prime example.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This detracts from the point that I haven't seen what the &amp;quot;link&amp;quot; is - i.e. the cited article is a secondary source and therefore not strong enough to justify the statement in this article regarding vaccines.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Oath also mentions not cutting out stones as well.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In all seriousness, it is simply impossible to verify the safety of any drugs completely before phase IV clinical trials - meaning after the drugs has been marketed. Unless you test the drug on every single person on earth and obtain a reading on it, no drug is &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;. Patient care is always riddled with uncertainty - and if physicians waits until he's 100% all the time, they'd actually do more harm to patients by their inaction. That's when professional judgment and experience comes in.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And to bring this back to our original discussion about _this_ article - all drugs have adverse reactions. Stating that Gardasil &amp;quot;has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration&amp;quot; from a news article (as opposed to a medical journal) is just a cheap, baseless way of attacking vaccines. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:08, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you give that drug to ''your'' daughter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've read medical journals. They are not the platinum standard of scientific inquiry that you believe them to be. I have personally seen ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' duped big-time by someone&amp;amp;mdash;at [[Duke University]], no less&amp;amp;mdash;pulling a total dry-lab job. Imagine the mortification of the senior professor who signed off on that person's papers, and even put his name on them, when he found out ''years later'' what a puerile fraud his student had been, and had to issue retractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I have seen other things get into ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' from &amp;quot;investigators&amp;quot; who were all on drug-company payrolls. I cite [[RU-486]] as a prime example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And that's just one journal, a journal that I might add already had developed an unsavory reputation among teaching-hospital staffers, from the chairman level through the attending level and on down to the residents, for scholarship that was less than sterling. I cannot even repeat their toilet-humor pun on the journal's name&amp;amp;mdash;at least, not here I can't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those who comment on, and especially those who make, public policy would be a lot more effective if they would just do a little bit of critical reading every now and then.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, I'm trying to improve the validity of this article by analyzing the references, not arguing for or against the efficacy or hazards of the vaccine. Why do you ask me whether I'd give the vaccine to my daughter? Unless my answer is going to be part of this article, it is absolutely irrelevant. (For your information, I do not have any children, and if I had a daughter I will not give her the shot before the age of 16. When she's reached that age she'll make her own decision regarding the shot.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you cite a primary source, it'd remove any potential bias that inherently exists in secondary sources. All I've been trying to say is that you should read that news article with the same attitude as you should with medical journals - with a grain of salt. Especially given the gravity of the statement - that the deaths has been linked to the vaccine - I believe we need something a little more than a news article. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 22:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The article gives some damaging evidence of a correlation. And while correlation does not equal causation, those quoted as denying the causal link would be motivated frankly to lie about the causal link. They include the manufacturer and a health-authority bureaucrat who wants to protect the justification of his mandate and budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I asked you whether you'd give your daughter the shot, if you had one, because I wanted to put the matter into a perspective that, all too often, public policymakers ignore. I appreciate your stepping up to the plate&amp;amp;mdash;though if you want the advice of one who once associated with the white smocks on a regular basis, I'd say that the time to safeguard any young woman from the hazards either of the shot or the thing that the shot is supposed (har-de-har-har) to protect against is about ten years ''earlier'' than any age of hypothetical &amp;quot;emancipation.&amp;quot; This after-the-fact pilltaking and muscle-jabbing and mainlining that doctors recommend these days is doing nothing to treat the underlying causes of sickness and, in my opinion as an &amp;quot;expert emeritus,&amp;quot; is making our society even sicker.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:00, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DouglasA. I am not 'pushing a socialist agenda' I am pointing out the facts. If THIS contradicts YOUR agenda then it is not my problem. The article originally cited makes no mention whatsoever of MMR which is exactly the topic under discussion in that section. That article may have in the NHS page but not here. To try and extend the point being made by the referenced article to MMR is purely speculation on your part and has no logical basis. However, it has been documented countless times that the decrease in MMR uptake is due to parents having opted out given the debunked claims over its links with autism. The reference I provided DOES actually mention MMR unlike the original. And as someone living in the UK I can tell you that there is no end of attempts by hte NHS to increase MMR uptake. You obviously don't approve of a socialized healthcare system, but to extend this to making purely speculative criticisms and claiming them as fact is uncalled for. There are valid criticisms of the NHS to be made, but this is not one of them. Is it so difficult to accept that even a system you so fundamentally disagree with has its advantages and is actually working to benefit people in this case? [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:30, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DWiggins, if you please, can you find other sources that bolster your claim about no autism/vaccination link, such as papers from the scientific community?  They would be better references than a single newspaper report.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:39, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The link was long ago debunked as it says even on this very article! My point is not a question of whether the link is real, but that the supposed link is the reason why there has been a decrease in MMR uptake. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:41, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you better read this article [http://www.naturalnews.com/011764_mercury_thimerosal_vaccines.html], because there may not be an autism link within the vaccination's actual medical content, but there is a definate link between autism and [[thimerosal]], which contains 49% mercury.  Remember the &amp;quot;Mad Hatter&amp;quot; from ''Alice in Wonderland''?  Based on fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I took out the &amp;quot;now debunked&amp;quot; line.  I think that it reads to nearly everyone's satisfaction now.  Does the MMR vaccine contain thimerosal?  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::According to this, it doesn't. [http://www.nfid.org/pdf/factsheets/thimerosal.pdf] --12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well i'm afraid Karajou that the article you provided is by no means whatsoever an authoritative source. There is consensus in the scientific community that there is no link between thimerosal and autism. To quote but another news article is simply missing the point. In large part it was the media that was to blame in stirring up this nonsense, whereas the science gave them no reason to. Take for example these two (of countless) examples which give a pretty thorough overview of the science behind the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17168158&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both dismiss a casual link between the chemical and autism, and show that there is no evidence in the scientific literature to support such a link. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DWiggins, the source I provided quotes from the pages of peer-reviewed papers from medical doctors, which means there is no consensus, as you claimed.  Since you missed reading them, I have posted them here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal&lt;br /&gt;
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system. &lt;br /&gt;
'''What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two! &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism. &lt;br /&gt;
'''A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a &amp;quot;development disability',&amp;quot; according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. &amp;quot;This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses &amp;quot;may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So not to try to revive a dead topic or anything, but today ''The Lancet'' fully and officially retracted the article it originally published that found the link between the MMR vaccine and Autism (I know the link is from a liberal website, but I feel like it's hard news so it's okay): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/emthe-lancetem-retracted_b_447341.html -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 10:46, 3 February 2010 (EST) (This is irrelevant, but I thought it was neat that the reCaptcha thing it's making me type to put the link in is &amp;quot;Caduceus&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NHS and vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::DouglasA by rejecting my edit and reinstating the original you were making such a claim. And the miseducation is not caused BY the NHS. The NHS has consistently rejected the claims about a link between autism and MMR. Again, just because you disagree with the concept of the NHS does not mean everything they do is bad wrong. I do not think anyone who knows anything about the NHS could ever argue they have not consistently tried to increase MMR uptake. By all means add that original article about costs and medicines, but you cannot simply link that to this MMR issue when there is nothing in that article to support this leap between two separate issues, and when in fact the evidence contradicts it in the case of MMR. By all means take out the bit about the promotion of the vaccine by the NHS, I put it in to counter the original false claims that the decrease in uptake was entirely the fault of the NHS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In regards to the above section, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of 'consensus'. Consensus is rarely unanimous, especially in fields so large as medicine. Consensus is the vast majority accepting something, and that is the case with the MMR vaccine and the supposed links to autism, which have been thoroughly rejected. Of course there will always be some who disagree, and unfortunately in a few cases, as with Dr. Wakefield, this disagreement is not all that it seems on the surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let's be clear about this. All the reviews of the scientific literature come out with the same conclusion. There is NO evidence to support a casual link between either thiomersal and autism, nor the MMR vaccine and autism. May I also request that you do not try and mix two separate issues together. The article cited originally concerning costs and medicine provision is not related to the MMR issue or any vaccine issue. It has no place in ''this'' article, though it may do elsewhere. I think that is the fundamental issue here, the issue of the links with autism is already discussed in the article itself where it is stated that there is no evidence.[[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 15:03, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DWiggins, a vast majority agreeing on something - a ''consensus'' - still doesn't make their position ''right'' as opposed to ''wrong''.  A vast ''consensus'' of people in the United States viewed slavery as ''right'' at one time in our history; were they correct in believing so?  No.  So how can a consensus of doctors be correct in viewing that there's no vaccination link to autism, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that mercury in a human body (as in thimerosal) does bad things?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:48, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I never said it 'makes their position right'. And in using the slavery example you are mixing up science and ethics. What is 'right' from a scientific point of view is something that has not yet been falsified, so it is perhaps better to say 'provisionally accepted' (please see my post on the Noah's Ark page I have recently made concerning the scientific method). The slavery example is a question of whether someone views slavery as morally 'right'. Of course to virtually everyone today the answer seems obvious, it is not. But as you say in the past this was not so simple, and many people saw it the opposite way. Our judgement of these people and their actions is retrospective, of course we view them as wrong, but they evidently believed they were right. Anyway, that is just an aside, since it is not relevant to the question of scientific proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It has been shown time and time again, through application of the scientific method that there is no casual link between MMR or thiomersal and autism. All claims otherwise have since been falsified, as such, the only logical conclusion that can currently be reached is that there is no such link. And you are also getting mixed up with your biochemistry. Yes, mercury is toxic. But thiomersal is not mercury, it is a compound containing the element. The pseudoscience behind the supposed link is that it has mercury, therefore it must be toxic, as if the mercury component jsut spontaneously separates from the rest of the compound in the human body. There is NO evidence to support a link between thiomersal and autism. I don't know how many more times it needs to be stated, by either me, or those men and women wearing the white coats who have investigated this time and time again. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Another aside: So there's no connection or relevence between scientific proof, the scientific method, and morality?  Thanks for clearing that up.  The Nazi Doctors must've had, as you say, provisionally accepted truth.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 06:52, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well now that I'm back I can address that point. You appear to have muddled the issues up a bit. I was not passing moral judgement on scientific discoveries, I was simply saying that a scientific 'truth' is not the same as a moral 'truth'. What the Nazi 'doctors' were doing was not even science, it was just butchery with the name science applied to it. Science can tell us what something is/how something works. It cannot tell us whether we should do something, though it can form a platform from which to make such decisions. Of course there's a connection between science and morality, but the scientific method is not a method of judging whether something is morally right or wrong, morality comes in when deciding how to use the results of scientific enquiry. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 19:28, 24 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's explore the connection between vaccines and STDs.&lt;br /&gt;
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPVSupplement99.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
HPV causes 99.7 percent of cervical cancer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=10451482]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what would be the motivation of giving young teenage girls a vaccine against HPV? Aren't we telling our daughters that it's okay to abandon God's plan (of chastity before marriage) and indulge in a little experimental fornication? &amp;quot;Hey, we're protecting you so nothing bad will happen.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:21, 21 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And when they say 'teenage' girls they don't mean 19 year old young adults, they mean 13 year old CHILDREN!  When such young people see what they see as authority figures (ie doctors) giving them the green light to indulge in promiscuous, dangerous behaviour, what are they going to think? [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 13:39, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flu Vaccine Updates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be included that influenza vaccine must be updated every year because the influenza virus evolves so readily? Or is this fact contrary to the worldview of this encyclopaedia?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know if &amp;quot;evolve&amp;quot; is the right term to use here. The influenza virus &amp;quot;mutates&amp;quot; (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Andrew Wakefield ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== vaccine panels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives. The meetings are not open to the public. They do not usually do much analysis, and tend to recommend whatever vaccines are available''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement throws out some pretty big accusations.  I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is even remotely true.   I'll give it a few days and if no-one finds a credible source then it'll be removed.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:53, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It is all true. What part do you doubt? The CDC regularly publishes the vaccine recommendations, and you can see much of this for yourself in those published reports. They have to grant waivers to the panel members to bypass govt conflict-of-interest laws. I agree that citations are needed, but please don't remove it unless you find some evidence that it is false. If it were false, it should be obvious from those CDC reports. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:48, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I doubt most of it actually.  I suppose I need to take a small step back and admit that all my experience dealing with Pharmaceuticals and vaccines comes from dealing (in a legal advisory capacity) with Pharmac which is the NZ regulatory and funding board for all medicines and treatments, I'm not familiar with the US experience.  Having said that, I know that the amount of scrutiny and participation by the public is very extensive.  In fact I have often heard people who work at Pharmac say that there is far too much consultation and attention paid to consumer groups and other groups who come from a strictly less than medical cost/benefit analysis.  I won't remove it because I accept that you might have some expertise in this area, but I do suggest we tighten up the wording a little.  At the moment the paragraph makes us appear angry and slightly conspiratorial, not learned critics of a flawed system.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:00, 6 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I followed this more about 10 years ago. I tried to get minutes of the meetings. I got some partial ones, but they were not posted in the internet, and they said that some could not be released because trade secret drug industry info was discussed. From what I got, there was no serious analysis. In one case, panel members said that they were requiring a vaccine because that allowed poor people to get it free. The whole thing seemed as if it were just serving the interests of the drug companies. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:42, 8 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vaccines do cause autism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least, they do in monkeys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Setrace|Setrace]] 11:41 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under controversy, there is a contradiction: &amp;quot;The sharp rise in autism, which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.[12]&amp;quot; but source 12 explicitly says vaccines don't cause autism. I removed this sentence and source, but is was put back with instructions to discuss it on the talk page. Something needs to be done about this contradiction. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:12, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's not a contradiction.  Citations are for facts set forth in the source, not baseless opinion that might appear in them.  Nobody has disproved that vaccines increase autism, and it's silly to pretend otherwise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:28, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The claim that vaccines don't cause autism is a claim of fact, it may be false, but it is not an opinion. We need to find a source that says vaccines cause autism if that is going to be stated in the article, if reliable sources say vaccines don't cause autism, then we should say that in the article. also, healthline seems more like a news source than a scientific source, per the MOS, shouldn't we find a better source anyway? [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:52, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tetanus&amp;diff=1420920</id>
		<title>Tetanus</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tetanus&amp;diff=1420920"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:28:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: fix errors and typos, update vaccines&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Tetanus''' is a [[toxin]]-producing [[bacterial]] [[disease]] which causes painful muscle spasms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/about/terms/glossary.htm#t&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tetanus is caused by the bacterium Clostridium tetani, which enters through wounds and causes contraction of the fibers in the skeletal muscles. Tetanus is also called lockjaw, which is actually a symptom of the disease. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tetanus is one of the diseases against which the Dtap, Tdap and Td vaccines are intended to provide protection.  Unlike many other vaccines, these doesn't vaccinate against the actual bacterium, but instead the toxin, tetanospasmin, which C. tetani produces. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tetanus can be diagnosed by early symptoms like:&lt;br /&gt;
# Muscular spasms could also be witnessed in different parts of the body.&lt;br /&gt;
# The muscles in the throat region are also affected.&lt;br /&gt;
# Pain and discomfort in the abdominal muscles too.&lt;br /&gt;
# Headache or a sore throat.&lt;br /&gt;
# The affected person may be extremely sensitive to touch.&lt;br /&gt;
# Diarrhea.&lt;br /&gt;
Among the various parts of the body that are affected by this toxin, the muscles in the jaw are affected severely. At full onset, one of the primary symptoms of Lockjaw is the series of spasms caused by tetanospasmin, the toxin that is produced by this bacterium. These spasms affect the ‘chewing muscles’ in the jaw, which makes it difficult to move in terms of either opening or close the mouth.{{cn}}&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As the disease progresses, another symptom which may be seen is bleeding of the bowels.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tetanus&amp;diff=1420918</id>
		<title>Tetanus</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Tetanus&amp;diff=1420918"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:22:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: link no longer exists&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Tetanus''' is a [[toxin]]-producing [[bacterial]] [[disease]] which causes painful muscle spasms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/about/terms/glossary.htm#t&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tetanus is caused by the bactium Clostridium Tetani, which enters through wounds and creating contraction of the fibers in the skeletal muscles. Tetanus is also called as Lockjaw, which is actually a symptom of the disease. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tetanus is one of the diseases for which the DPT vaccine is intended to provid protection.  Unlike other vaccines, DPT doesn't vaccinate against the actual virus, but instead the toxin which Tetanus produces. Tetanus toxin is otherwise called Tetanospasmin. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tetanus can be diagnosed by early symptoms like:&lt;br /&gt;
# Muscular spasms could also be witnessed in different parts of the body.&lt;br /&gt;
# The muscles in the throat region are also affected.&lt;br /&gt;
# Pain and discomfort in the abdominal muscles too.&lt;br /&gt;
# Headache or a sore throat.&lt;br /&gt;
# The affected person may be extremely sensitive to touch.&lt;br /&gt;
# Diarrhea.&lt;br /&gt;
Among the various parts of the body that are affected by this toxin, the muscles in the jaw are affected severely. At full onset, one of the primary symptoms of Lockjaw is the series of spasms caused by Tetanospasmin, the toxin that is produced by this bacteria. These spasms affect the ‘chewing muscles’ in the jaw, which makes it difficult to move the mouth in terms of either opening or closing.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As the disease progresses, another symptom which may be seen is bleeding of the bowels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Diseases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420915</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420915"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:16:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Adverse Reactions */ source dosen't say this&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/ethical-issues-and-vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2018/are-vaccine-ingredients-safe.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can result in over or under-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
Injuries in infants and children from vaccination are admitted by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see. The sharp rise in [[autism]], which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as [[New Jersey]] and [[North Carolina]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.healthline.com/health/autism/autism-rates-by-state#2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;The new estimate represents a 15% increase from two years prior and a 150% increase since 2000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/26/health/autism-prevalence-cdc/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease, this is called [[herd immunity]]. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance. The difference in vaccination rates between these states is actually very slight, and usually not nearly enough to affect herd immunity.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency became seriously ill. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be caused by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Common Misconceptions Surrounding Vaccines ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have injured many in the developing world, sometimes due to contamination in donated stale vaccines.  The vaccine was banned for over a year in Nigeria after concerns about safety were raised. The ban has since been lifted, but the vaccination rate remains low.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420913</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420913"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:13:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Adverse Reactions */ typo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/ethical-issues-and-vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2018/are-vaccine-ingredients-safe.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can result in over or under-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
Injuries in infants and children from vaccination are admitted by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see. The sharp rise in [[autism]], which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as [[New Jersey]] and [[North Carolina]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.healthline.com/health/autism/autism-rates-by-state#2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;The new estimate represents a 15% increase from two years prior and a 150% increase since 2000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/26/health/autism-prevalence-cdc/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease, this is called [[herd immunity]]. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance. The difference in vaccination rates between these states is actually very slight, and usually not nearly enough to affect herd immunity.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency became seriously ill. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be caused by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=2067071044 General Practice Notebook - vaccine reactions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Common Misconceptions Surrounding Vaccines ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have injured many in the developing world, sometimes due to contamination in donated stale vaccines.  The vaccine was banned for over a year in Nigeria after concerns about safety were raised. The ban has since been lifted, but the vaccination rate remains low.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1420912</id>
		<title>Talk:Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Vaccine&amp;diff=1420912"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T03:12:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* contradiction */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm surprised. This is an acceptable article. [[User:Linus M.|Liπus the Turbogeek]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:Linus M.|contact me]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:37, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. it is.  It actually tells me something.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 13:49, 5 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blaylock Wellness Report ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parts of the paragraph that used the Blaylock Wellness Report as a source is very questionable. The website itself is a promotion for subscribing to a paid newsletter; it has &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; that says why vaccine is bad - but no logical evidence to back it up. Discover &amp;quot;the truth behind Gulf War Syndrome&amp;quot;? A website like that shouldn't be trusted, let alone used as a source. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:12, 26 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gardasil ==&lt;br /&gt;
The source cited for the connection between Gardisil and deaths explicitly states that no connection has been proven. I'm going to remove this bullet. -- [[User:Aaronp|Aaronp]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The bullet has been restored. If you had read the article further down, you would have seen that the article writer was improperly accepting as two-plus-two-equals-four-level fact the boilerplate from the manufacturer and from the health authority, each of whom has an ax to grind. And you would have seen dissenting opinions, from a patient advocacy group and from a general practitioner who expressed grave doubts about the applicability to adolescent girls of a safety study conducted on adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The over-reliance on vaccination for the avoidance of diseases best avoided by other means will probably be the subject of an Essay someday. For now, the bullet stands, following a proper critical reading of the source.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:14, 22 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Fletcher and Oakley - from the patient advocacy group, and a GP, respectively - simply stated that the effects of the vaccine on adolescents are '''unknown''' - meaning they themselves haven't established the link purported in this article. I'd like to see the actual report from Judicial Watch that the news article was referring to though; since the news article itself did not cite it, I find the entire Telegraph article suspect. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 12:36, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, but you miss a vital element in the [[Hippocratic Oath]]: ''Never bring harm upon anyone.'' In latin, ''primum non nocere''. First of all, do no harm. By that standard, a physician who does ''anything'' to a patient without first verifying that that thing is safe is behaving in an irresponsible manner. But modern [[medicine]] has forgotten that lesson and in that manner has gone completely off the rails. And Gardasil is a prime example.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This detracts from the point that I haven't seen what the &amp;quot;link&amp;quot; is - i.e. the cited article is a secondary source and therefore not strong enough to justify the statement in this article regarding vaccines.&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Oath also mentions not cutting out stones as well.&lt;br /&gt;
::::In all seriousness, it is simply impossible to verify the safety of any drugs completely before phase IV clinical trials - meaning after the drugs has been marketed. Unless you test the drug on every single person on earth and obtain a reading on it, no drug is &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot;. Patient care is always riddled with uncertainty - and if physicians waits until he's 100% all the time, they'd actually do more harm to patients by their inaction. That's when professional judgment and experience comes in.&lt;br /&gt;
::::And to bring this back to our original discussion about _this_ article - all drugs have adverse reactions. Stating that Gardasil &amp;quot;has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration&amp;quot; from a news article (as opposed to a medical journal) is just a cheap, baseless way of attacking vaccines. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 15:08, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Would you give that drug to ''your'' daughter?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I've read medical journals. They are not the platinum standard of scientific inquiry that you believe them to be. I have personally seen ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' duped big-time by someone&amp;amp;mdash;at [[Duke University]], no less&amp;amp;mdash;pulling a total dry-lab job. Imagine the mortification of the senior professor who signed off on that person's papers, and even put his name on them, when he found out ''years later'' what a puerile fraud his student had been, and had to issue retractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And I have seen other things get into ''The New England Journal of Medicine'' from &amp;quot;investigators&amp;quot; who were all on drug-company payrolls. I cite [[RU-486]] as a prime example.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And that's just one journal, a journal that I might add already had developed an unsavory reputation among teaching-hospital staffers, from the chairman level through the attending level and on down to the residents, for scholarship that was less than sterling. I cannot even repeat their toilet-humor pun on the journal's name&amp;amp;mdash;at least, not here I can't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Those who comment on, and especially those who make, public policy would be a lot more effective if they would just do a little bit of critical reading every now and then.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:19, 23 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Again, I'm trying to improve the validity of this article by analyzing the references, not arguing for or against the efficacy or hazards of the vaccine. Why do you ask me whether I'd give the vaccine to my daughter? Unless my answer is going to be part of this article, it is absolutely irrelevant. (For your information, I do not have any children, and if I had a daughter I will not give her the shot before the age of 16. When she's reached that age she'll make her own decision regarding the shot.)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you cite a primary source, it'd remove any potential bias that inherently exists in secondary sources. All I've been trying to say is that you should read that news article with the same attitude as you should with medical journals - with a grain of salt. Especially given the gravity of the statement - that the deaths has been linked to the vaccine - I believe we need something a little more than a news article. [[User:ATang|ATang]] 22:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::The article gives some damaging evidence of a correlation. And while correlation does not equal causation, those quoted as denying the causal link would be motivated frankly to lie about the causal link. They include the manufacturer and a health-authority bureaucrat who wants to protect the justification of his mandate and budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I asked you whether you'd give your daughter the shot, if you had one, because I wanted to put the matter into a perspective that, all too often, public policymakers ignore. I appreciate your stepping up to the plate&amp;amp;mdash;though if you want the advice of one who once associated with the white smocks on a regular basis, I'd say that the time to safeguard any young woman from the hazards either of the shot or the thing that the shot is supposed (har-de-har-har) to protect against is about ten years ''earlier'' than any age of hypothetical &amp;quot;emancipation.&amp;quot; This after-the-fact pilltaking and muscle-jabbing and mainlining that doctors recommend these days is doing nothing to treat the underlying causes of sickness and, in my opinion as an &amp;quot;expert emeritus,&amp;quot; is making our society even sicker.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:00, 24 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MMR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DouglasA. I am not 'pushing a socialist agenda' I am pointing out the facts. If THIS contradicts YOUR agenda then it is not my problem. The article originally cited makes no mention whatsoever of MMR which is exactly the topic under discussion in that section. That article may have in the NHS page but not here. To try and extend the point being made by the referenced article to MMR is purely speculation on your part and has no logical basis. However, it has been documented countless times that the decrease in MMR uptake is due to parents having opted out given the debunked claims over its links with autism. The reference I provided DOES actually mention MMR unlike the original. And as someone living in the UK I can tell you that there is no end of attempts by hte NHS to increase MMR uptake. You obviously don't approve of a socialized healthcare system, but to extend this to making purely speculative criticisms and claiming them as fact is uncalled for. There are valid criticisms of the NHS to be made, but this is not one of them. Is it so difficult to accept that even a system you so fundamentally disagree with has its advantages and is actually working to benefit people in this case? [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:30, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:DWiggins, if you please, can you find other sources that bolster your claim about no autism/vaccination link, such as papers from the scientific community?  They would be better references than a single newspaper report.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:39, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::The link was long ago debunked as it says even on this very article! My point is not a question of whether the link is real, but that the supposed link is the reason why there has been a decrease in MMR uptake. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:41, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think you better read this article [http://www.naturalnews.com/011764_mercury_thimerosal_vaccines.html], because there may not be an autism link within the vaccination's actual medical content, but there is a definate link between autism and [[thimerosal]], which contains 49% mercury.  Remember the &amp;quot;Mad Hatter&amp;quot; from ''Alice in Wonderland''?  Based on fact.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 12:47, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I took out the &amp;quot;now debunked&amp;quot; line.  I think that it reads to nearly everyone's satisfaction now.  Does the MMR vaccine contain thimerosal?  --[[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::According to this, it doesn't. [http://www.nfid.org/pdf/factsheets/thimerosal.pdf] --12:51, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well i'm afraid Karajou that the article you provided is by no means whatsoever an authoritative source. There is consensus in the scientific community that there is no link between thimerosal and autism. To quote but another news article is simply missing the point. In large part it was the media that was to blame in stirring up this nonsense, whereas the science gave them no reason to. Take for example these two (of countless) examples which give a pretty thorough overview of the science behind the issue:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10997&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17168158&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both dismiss a casual link between the chemical and autism, and show that there is no evidence in the scientific literature to support such a link. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 12:56, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DWiggins, the source I provided quotes from the pages of peer-reviewed papers from medical doctors, which means there is no consensus, as you claimed.  Since you missed reading them, I have posted them here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal&lt;br /&gt;
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system. &lt;br /&gt;
'''What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65'''&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two! &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland). &lt;br /&gt;
'''Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism. &lt;br /&gt;
'''A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a &amp;quot;development disability',&amp;quot; according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. &amp;quot;This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses &amp;quot;may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
'''AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination. &lt;br /&gt;
'''The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children… &lt;br /&gt;
'''Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: So not to try to revive a dead topic or anything, but today ''The Lancet'' fully and officially retracted the article it originally published that found the link between the MMR vaccine and Autism (I know the link is from a liberal website, but I feel like it's hard news so it's okay): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-gordon/emthe-lancetem-retracted_b_447341.html -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 10:46, 3 February 2010 (EST) (This is irrelevant, but I thought it was neat that the reCaptcha thing it's making me type to put the link in is &amp;quot;Caduceus&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NHS and vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Douglas, the article you cite has nothing to do with vaccination.  The increase in measles '''is''' due to to parents opting out of the vaccine, as was shown by DWiggins citation.  I'm not here to argue whether the NHS is good or bad, but the article you cite does not support the claim you are making when dealing directly with vaccination.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:13, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I didn't make the claim. You may not realize this, but wiki articles are made by many contributors.  However, DWiggins' citation shows nothing but throwing blame on a public miseducated by the NHS. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] 13:26, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I understand how wikis are made.  I think I've been here for almost a year and a half, if memory serves.  I re-added the first part of DWiggins' edit.  I believe this is a compromise that shows why measles are becoming more prominent in Britain, while not patting the NHS on the back.  -- [[User:JLauttamus|Jeffrey W. Lauttamus]][[User_talk:JLauttamus|&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;Discussion&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;]] 13:49, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::DouglasA by rejecting my edit and reinstating the original you were making such a claim. And the miseducation is not caused BY the NHS. The NHS has consistently rejected the claims about a link between autism and MMR. Again, just because you disagree with the concept of the NHS does not mean everything they do is bad wrong. I do not think anyone who knows anything about the NHS could ever argue they have not consistently tried to increase MMR uptake. By all means add that original article about costs and medicines, but you cannot simply link that to this MMR issue when there is nothing in that article to support this leap between two separate issues, and when in fact the evidence contradicts it in the case of MMR. By all means take out the bit about the promotion of the vaccine by the NHS, I put it in to counter the original false claims that the decrease in uptake was entirely the fault of the NHS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In regards to the above section, you seem to misunderstand the meaning of 'consensus'. Consensus is rarely unanimous, especially in fields so large as medicine. Consensus is the vast majority accepting something, and that is the case with the MMR vaccine and the supposed links to autism, which have been thoroughly rejected. Of course there will always be some who disagree, and unfortunately in a few cases, as with Dr. Wakefield, this disagreement is not all that it seems on the surface. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let's be clear about this. All the reviews of the scientific literature come out with the same conclusion. There is NO evidence to support a casual link between either thiomersal and autism, nor the MMR vaccine and autism. May I also request that you do not try and mix two separate issues together. The article cited originally concerning costs and medicine provision is not related to the MMR issue or any vaccine issue. It has no place in ''this'' article, though it may do elsewhere. I think that is the fundamental issue here, the issue of the links with autism is already discussed in the article itself where it is stated that there is no evidence.[[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 15:03, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DWiggins, a vast majority agreeing on something - a ''consensus'' - still doesn't make their position ''right'' as opposed to ''wrong''.  A vast ''consensus'' of people in the United States viewed slavery as ''right'' at one time in our history; were they correct in believing so?  No.  So how can a consensus of doctors be correct in viewing that there's no vaccination link to autism, when it's been demonstrated time and time again that mercury in a human body (as in thimerosal) does bad things?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:48, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I never said it 'makes their position right'. And in using the slavery example you are mixing up science and ethics. What is 'right' from a scientific point of view is something that has not yet been falsified, so it is perhaps better to say 'provisionally accepted' (please see my post on the Noah's Ark page I have recently made concerning the scientific method). The slavery example is a question of whether someone views slavery as morally 'right'. Of course to virtually everyone today the answer seems obvious, it is not. But as you say in the past this was not so simple, and many people saw it the opposite way. Our judgement of these people and their actions is retrospective, of course we view them as wrong, but they evidently believed they were right. Anyway, that is just an aside, since it is not relevant to the question of scientific proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It has been shown time and time again, through application of the scientific method that there is no casual link between MMR or thiomersal and autism. All claims otherwise have since been falsified, as such, the only logical conclusion that can currently be reached is that there is no such link. And you are also getting mixed up with your biochemistry. Yes, mercury is toxic. But thiomersal is not mercury, it is a compound containing the element. The pseudoscience behind the supposed link is that it has mercury, therefore it must be toxic, as if the mercury component jsut spontaneously separates from the rest of the compound in the human body. There is NO evidence to support a link between thiomersal and autism. I don't know how many more times it needs to be stated, by either me, or those men and women wearing the white coats who have investigated this time and time again. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 16:58, 5 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Another aside: So there's no connection or relevence between scientific proof, the scientific method, and morality?  Thanks for clearing that up.  The Nazi Doctors must've had, as you say, provisionally accepted truth.   [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 06:52, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well now that I'm back I can address that point. You appear to have muddled the issues up a bit. I was not passing moral judgement on scientific discoveries, I was simply saying that a scientific 'truth' is not the same as a moral 'truth'. What the Nazi 'doctors' were doing was not even science, it was just butchery with the name science applied to it. Science can tell us what something is/how something works. It cannot tell us whether we should do something, though it can form a platform from which to make such decisions. Of course there's a connection between science and morality, but the scientific method is not a method of judging whether something is morally right or wrong, morality comes in when deciding how to use the results of scientific enquiry. [[User:DWiggins|DWiggins]] 19:28, 24 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vaccines and sexually transmitted disease==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's explore the connection between vaccines and STDs.&lt;br /&gt;
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common STD. [http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/HPVSupplement99.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
HPV causes 99.7 percent of cervical cancer. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=PubMed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=10451482]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what would be the motivation of giving young teenage girls a vaccine against HPV? Aren't we telling our daughters that it's okay to abandon God's plan (of chastity before marriage) and indulge in a little experimental fornication? &amp;quot;Hey, we're protecting you so nothing bad will happen.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:21, 21 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And when they say 'teenage' girls they don't mean 19 year old young adults, they mean 13 year old CHILDREN!  When such young people see what they see as authority figures (ie doctors) giving them the green light to indulge in promiscuous, dangerous behaviour, what are they going to think? [[User:TrondE|TrondE]] 13:39, 22 November 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flu Vaccine Updates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Should it be included that influenza vaccine must be updated every year because the influenza virus evolves so readily? Or is this fact contrary to the worldview of this encyclopaedia?&lt;br /&gt;
:::Define evolve as evolutionists often like to equivocate. [[User:Conservative|conservative]] 11:46, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I don't know if &amp;quot;evolve&amp;quot; is the right term to use here. The influenza virus &amp;quot;mutates&amp;quot; (as all genomes do, this isn't really debated; influenza virus strains just at a far more rapid rate than, say, human genomes). The influenza virus isn't adapting to vaccines nor is natural selection involved (both are core elements of evolution); rather the virus strain is merely changing and is no more or less adapted than ones before it. -[[User:DwightL|DwightL]] 12:49, 3 February 2010 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Andrew Wakefield ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My edit concerning the fraudulent research done by Andrew Wakefield was just reverted. Is there any reason for this revert? I don't see any legal issue, as Wakefield's fraud has been conclusively proven. --[[User:BernardC|BernardC]] 18:00, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== vaccine panels ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives. The meetings are not open to the public. They do not usually do much analysis, and tend to recommend whatever vaccines are available''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This statement throws out some pretty big accusations.  I haven't been able to find any evidence that this is even remotely true.   I'll give it a few days and if no-one finds a credible source then it'll be removed.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 19:53, 4 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: It is all true. What part do you doubt? The CDC regularly publishes the vaccine recommendations, and you can see much of this for yourself in those published reports. They have to grant waivers to the panel members to bypass govt conflict-of-interest laws. I agree that citations are needed, but please don't remove it unless you find some evidence that it is false. If it were false, it should be obvious from those CDC reports. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 11:48, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well I doubt most of it actually.  I suppose I need to take a small step back and admit that all my experience dealing with Pharmaceuticals and vaccines comes from dealing (in a legal advisory capacity) with Pharmac which is the NZ regulatory and funding board for all medicines and treatments, I'm not familiar with the US experience.  Having said that, I know that the amount of scrutiny and participation by the public is very extensive.  In fact I have often heard people who work at Pharmac say that there is far too much consultation and attention paid to consumer groups and other groups who come from a strictly less than medical cost/benefit analysis.  I won't remove it because I accept that you might have some expertise in this area, but I do suggest we tighten up the wording a little.  At the moment the paragraph makes us appear angry and slightly conspiratorial, not learned critics of a flawed system.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 01:00, 6 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I followed this more about 10 years ago. I tried to get minutes of the meetings. I got some partial ones, but they were not posted in the internet, and they said that some could not be released because trade secret drug industry info was discussed. From what I got, there was no serious analysis. In one case, panel members said that they were requiring a vaccine because that allowed poor people to get it free. The whole thing seemed as if it were just serving the interests of the drug companies. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:42, 8 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vaccines do cause autism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least, they do in monkeys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If vaccines play absolutely no role in the development of childhood autism, a claim made by many medical authorities today, then why are some of the most popular vaccines commonly administered to children demonstrably causing autism in animal primates? This is the question many people are now asking after a recent study conducted by scientists at the University of Pittsburgh (UP) in Pennsylvania revealed that many of the infant monkeys given standard doses of childhood vaccines as part of the new research developed autism symptoms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For their analysis, Laura Hewitson and her colleagues at UP conducted the type of proper safety research on typical childhood vaccination schedules that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should have conducted -- but never has -- for such regimens. And what this brave team discovered was groundbreaking, as it completely deconstructs the mainstream myth that vaccines are safe and pose no risk of autism. Presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research (IMFAR) in London, England, the findings revealed that young macaque monkeys given the typical CDC-recommended vaccination schedule from the 1990s, and in appropriate doses for the monkeys' sizes and ages, tended to develop autism symptoms. Their unvaccinated counterparts, on the other hand, developed no such symptoms, which points to a strong connection between vaccines and autism spectrum disorders.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.naturalnews.com/035787_vaccines_autism_monkeys.html&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Setrace|Setrace]] 11:41 4 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== contradiction ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under controversy, there is a contradiction: &amp;quot;The sharp rise in autism, which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as New Jersey and North Carolina.[12]&amp;quot; but source 12 explicitly says vaccines don't cause autism. I removed this sentence and source, but is was put back with instructions to discuss it on the talk page. Something needs to be done about this contradiction. [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 23:12, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420907</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420907"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T02:57:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/ethical-issues-and-vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2018/are-vaccine-ingredients-safe.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can result in over or under-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
Injuries in infants and children from vaccination are admitted by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see. The sharp rise in [[autism]], which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as [[New Jersey]] and [[North Carolina]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.healthline.com/health/autism/autism-rates-by-state#2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;The new estimate represents a 15% increase from two years prior and a 150% increase since 2000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/26/health/autism-prevalence-cdc/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease, this is called [[herd immunity]]. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance. The difference in vaccination rates between these states is actually very slight, and usually not nearly enough to affect herd immunity.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency became seriously ill. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be causes by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=2067071044 General Practice Notebook - vaccine reactions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Common Misconceptions Surrounding Vaccines ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have injured many in the developing world, sometimes due to contamination in donated stale vaccines.  The vaccine was banned for over a year in Nigeria after concerns about safety were raised. The ban has since been lifted, but the vaccination rate remains low.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420906</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420906"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T02:55:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/ethical-issues-and-vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2018/are-vaccine-ingredients-safe.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can result in over or under-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
Injuries in infants and children from vaccination are admitted by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see. The sharp rise in [[autism]], which is generally considered incurable and afflicts 1 out of every 59 children, has a correlation with the increase in vaccination, and the incidence of autism appears to be greater in states where children receive more vaccines, such as [[New Jersey]] and [[North Carolina]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.healthline.com/health/autism/autism-rates-by-state#2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;The new estimate represents a 15% increase from two years prior and a 150% increase since 2000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/26/health/autism-prevalence-cdc/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease, this is called [[herd immunity]]. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance. The difference in vaccination rates between these states is actually very slight, and usually not nearly enough to affect herd immunity.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency were seriously sickened. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be causes by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=2067071044 General Practice Notebook - vaccine reactions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Common Misconceptions Surrounding Vaccines ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have injured many in the developing world, sometimes due to contamination in donated stale vaccines.  The vaccine was banned for over a year in Nigeria after concerns about safety were raised. The ban has since been lifted, but the vaccination rate remains low.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420902</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420902"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T02:50:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination */  unsourced&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/ethical-issues-and-vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2018/are-vaccine-ingredients-safe.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for  sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can result in over or under-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
Injuries in infants and children from vaccination are admitted by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
.When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease, this is called [[herd immunity]]. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency became seriously ill. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be causes by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=2067071044 General Practice Notebook - vaccine reactions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420901</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420901"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T02:46:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Common Misconceptions Surrounding Vaccines */ unsourced, if anyone finds a source feel free to re-add&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/ethical-issues-and-vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2018/are-vaccine-ingredients-safe.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for  sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can result in over or under-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
Injuries in infants and children from vaccination are admitted by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
A concept in vaccine planning is &amp;quot;[[herd immunity]]&amp;quot;. When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance. The difference in vaccination rates between these states is actually very slight, and usually not nearly enough to affect herd immunity.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency were seriously sickened. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be causes by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=2067071044 General Practice Notebook - vaccine reactions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420900</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420900"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T02:44:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: another source&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/ethical-issues-and-vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/January-2018/are-vaccine-ingredients-safe.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for  sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can result in over or under-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
Injuries in infants and children from vaccination are admitted by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
A concept in vaccine planning is &amp;quot;[[herd immunity]]&amp;quot;. When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance. The difference in vaccination rates between these states is actually very slight, and usually not nearly enough to affect herd immunity.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency were seriously sickened. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be causes by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=2067071044 General Practice Notebook - vaccine reactions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Common Misconceptions Surrounding Vaccines ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have injured many in the developing world, sometimes due to contamination in donated stale vaccines.  The vaccine was banned for over a year in Nigeria after concerns about safety were raised. The ban has since been lifted, but the vaccination rate remains low.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420899</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420899"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T02:43:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: typo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/ethical-issues-and-vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for  sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can result in over or under-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
Injuries in infants and children from vaccination are admitted by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
A concept in vaccine planning is &amp;quot;[[herd immunity]]&amp;quot;. When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance. The difference in vaccination rates between these states is actually very slight, and usually not nearly enough to affect herd immunity.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency were seriously sickened. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be causes by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=2067071044 General Practice Notebook - vaccine reactions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Common Misconceptions Surrounding Vaccines ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have injured many in the developing world, sometimes due to contamination in donated stale vaccines.  The vaccine was banned for over a year in Nigeria after concerns about safety were raised. The ban has since been lifted, but the vaccination rate remains low.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420898</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420898"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T02:43:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: add source&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.historyofvaccines.org/content/articles/ethical-issues-and-vaccines&amp;lt;/rev&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for  sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can result in over or under-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
Injuries in infants and children from vaccination are admitted by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
A concept in vaccine planning is &amp;quot;[[herd immunity]]&amp;quot;. When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance. The difference in vaccination rates between these states is actually very slight, and usually not nearly enough to affect herd immunity.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency were seriously sickened. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be causes by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=2067071044 General Practice Notebook - vaccine reactions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Common Misconceptions Surrounding Vaccines ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have injured many in the developing world, sometimes due to contamination in donated stale vaccines.  The vaccine was banned for over a year in Nigeria after concerns about safety were raised. The ban has since been lifted, but the vaccination rate remains low.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420895</id>
		<title>Vaccine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vaccine&amp;diff=1420895"/>
		<updated>2018-05-09T02:36:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Qw23: /* Controversy */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Vaccine.jpg|right|thumb|350px|[[Avian flu]] vaccine development]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''vaccine''' is a pharmaceutical product containing an [[antigen]] designed to stimulate the production of antibodies against a particular disease or diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/explainer-what-vaccine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the adoption of mass vaccination programs, many diseases have been curbed. [[Smallpox]], a contagious disease that killed 30 percent of those it infected, has been entirely eliminated through vaccination, excepting some strains maintained in labs for research purposes. Vaccination programs of the 19th and 20th century were effective at curbing the disease, and in 1979 the World Health Organization declared smallpox to be eradicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/history/history.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another disease that has been eliminated from the US is [[Polio]], which killed over 3,000 people in the United States in 1952,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/VSUS_1952_2.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and afflicted such noted persons as President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]], actor Alan Alda, and musician Itzak Perlman. When doctors began using a vaccine to fight polio, it practically eradicated the disease in the developed world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/polio/progress/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The incidence of other diseases such as [[diphtheria]], [[pertussis]], and [[measles]], has decreased greatly from improvements in sanitation, increased awareness of the benefits of hand-washing and other preventive measures, and the invention of vaccines against these diseases.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.unicef.org/pon96/hevaccin.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While vaccines have been successful at preventing infectious disease, they have also resulted in controversy regarding their safety and effectiveness, legal and ethical issues surrounding mandatory vaccination, and whether children should be vaccinated against STDs{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mechanism==&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the body produces an antibody against a particular disease or toxin it can identify the infection early on and the [[immune system]] can destroy it. Vaccines work by exposing the body to a form of the disease in such a way that it is much less likely cause illness but still allows antibodies to develop. This confers a level of immunity to the person or animal vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.howstuffworks.com/immune-system7.htm How stuff works: Antibodies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five major types of vaccines and they are differentiated by what type of antigen is used. Live attenuated vaccines are created from the actual disease in question, however before injection the [[pathogen]] is [[attenuated]] (weakened) by growing successive generations of the pathogen in poor nutrient conditions. Because they contain live pathogens, it is still possible for these vaccines to cause infection, particularly in imunnocompromised individuals. Inactivated vaccines are created from pathogens that have been killed, usually with [[formaldehyde]]. Toxoid vaccines are created by using toxins produced by the pathogen, these toxins are exposed to heat and/or chemicals such as formaldehyde to inactivate the toxins, but [[antibodies]] that are produced to these deactivated toxins will also protect against the real toxin. Subunit vaccines use pieces of the pathogen in the vaccine. These pieces often consist of unique protein segments that stimulate the production of antibodies. Finally, conjugate vaccines protect against bacteria that are encapsulated in  polysaccharides (complex sugars), which disguise the bacteria, making it hard for the immune system to recognize them. Conjugate vaccines overcome this by attaching the sugar to a protein the does stimulate the immune system, thus triggering the immune system to react to the sugar in the future even if it is not accompanied by the protein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/conversations/downloads/vacsafe-understand-color-office.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Traditionally a few highly tested vaccines were recommended for children to protect against deadly or severe diseases, such as [[smallpox]] and [[polio]]. Beginning in the 1990s, however, profit-driven vaccine manufacturers lobbied states and pediatrician organizations to compel numerous additional vaccines for  sexually transmitted or less dangerous diseases.  In addition, emotion based on inadequate information can result in over or under-vaccination.&lt;br /&gt;
Injuries in infants and children from vaccination are admitted by the government, and severe potential side effects are disclosed on packaging labels that most parents never see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17 US states have philosophical exemptions allowing parents to decline the vaccines; 47 states have religious exemptions; all states have medical exemptions,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nvic.org/Vaccine-Laws/state-vaccine-requirements.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vaccinesafety.edu/cc-exem.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but they are hardest to obtain.  Some parents choose to [[homeschooling|homeschool]] rather than submit their children to numerous vaccinations as required by state laws, due to lobbying by vaccine manufacturers, as a condition of being in school.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influenza Vaccine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The flu vaccine is an example of modern vaccination. Due to the change in [[allele]] frequency over time in the population of the influenza virus, new influenza vaccines are created each year.  In some years the vaccines are less effective than in other years. According to the [http://www.cdc.gov/ CDC],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, What you need to know,&amp;quot; a publication of the Center for Disease Control, 2006. Available online at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/VIS/vis-flu.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Influenza viruses are always changing. Therefore, influenza vaccines are updated every year, and an annual vaccination is recommended.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since production of the vaccine must begin many months before the influenza season starts models of the population genetics of the virus must be produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/nrd/journal/v5/n3/full/nrd1988.html Influenza vaccines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The success of vaccinations programs is dependent on the accuracy of these predictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nature.com/news/2003/030324/full/030324-5.html Flu changes modeled&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The National Institute of Health recently assigned $26 million to establish a research center to better develop molecular models of influenza.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.spiritindia.com/health-care-news-articles-8024.html $26 million NIH contract to establish new flu/bird flu Center of Excellence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Herd immunity and mandatory vaccination==&lt;br /&gt;
A concept in vaccine planning is &amp;quot;[[herd immunity]]&amp;quot;. When a certain percentage of a population is vaccinated, those within the population who are not vaccinated are protected from the disease. If 90 percent of a population is immune, then the chances that a carrier of the disease will come into contact with a non-immune member of the population (or &amp;quot;herd&amp;quot;) is low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mathepi.com/maindir/herd.html The mathematics of herd immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Herd immunity is the goal of most vaccination programs as it is the point where a disease can start to be eliminated from a population altogether. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in 1962 Japan instituted mandatory vaccination against influenza in school children. This continued until 1987 when the program was changed to optional; it was abandoned in 1994. Approximately 85 percent of children were estimated to have been vaccinated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{hnb|Glezen|2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Several studies examined the mortality rates due to influenza during this period of time and revealed that the death rates due to influenza in all population groups was drastically decreased, including older adult populations. Since there was no increased rate of vaccination in these populations, the decreased mortality was caused by herd immunity effects of vaccinating so many children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/Vaccine-Weekly/2001-04-11/200104113335VW.html Mandatory Vaccination of Japanese Schoolchildren Demonstrates &amp;quot;Herd Immunity&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many researchers have written that this and other evidence argues strongly for mandatory vaccination programs worldwide as a means of controlling many diseases and preventing a [[pandemic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1360502 Herd Immunity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USA has federal vaccination recommendations according to an official CDC schedule. Requirements are up to the states. Most states have medical and religious exemptions. Some states make it very easy to opt out of vaccines, while other states strictly enforce compliance for school attendance. The difference in vaccination rates between these states is actually very slight, and usually not nearly enough to affect herd immunity.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of February 2008, the CDC noted that &amp;quot;fewer than 100 measles cases are now reported annually in the United States and virtually all of those are linked to imported cases&amp;quot; in which someone is infected during overseas travel. The USA maintains herd immunity for measles, even in states where it is easy to opt out of vaccination requirements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Measles can be serious; according to an article in The Times, &amp;quot;About one in every 15 children has complications that can include [[meningitis]], [[pneumonia]], [[fits]], [[encephalitis]] (swelling of the brain), [[blindness]] and [[brain damage]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''How the MMR scare led to the return of measles'', February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683687.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the England and Wales, there were 1,348 cases of measles in 2008; two children died of the disease.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Sunday Times, ''MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield fixed data on autism'', by Brian Deer, February 8, 2009 [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CDC notes that when a measles outbreak occurs, the cost to taxpayers can be substantial. Public health responsibilities include &amp;quot;identification of cases, isolation of patients and vaccination, administration of [[immune globulin]], and voluntary quarantine of contacts who have no evidence of measles immunity...In Iowa, the public health response to one imported measles case cost approximately $150,000.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, ''Outbreak of Measles --- San Diego, California, January--February 2008'', February 29, 2008 [http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5708a3.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other diseases besides the measles have also started not only to reappear but also to kill children. Hib (''[[Haemophilus influenzae]]'' type B) meningitis recently killed an infant in Minnesota. The child who died had not been vaccinated. Two others who had been either partially, but not fully, vaccinated, or who had an immune deficiency were seriously sickened. The vaccine for Hib is less than twenty years old, but this is the first death due to the disease in the state of Minnesota since the vaccine was introduced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://children.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20090123/hib-outbreak-kills-unvaccinated-child Hib Outbreak Kills Unvaccinated Child]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Herd Immunity in Britain===&lt;br /&gt;
Due to a decrease in vaccination, measles has become endemic in Britain. This means that measles does not need to be brought in by travelers, but instead has a large enough base of non-immune individuals for it to continuously spread inside the country. In London, only 71 percent of children receive the first dose of the vaccine and only 51 percent receive the second dose. Due to this decline, there were 461 measles cases in Britain in the first half of 2008. These cases have had tragic consequences, with the death of a 17 year old reported in 2008.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.healthdirect.co.uk/2008/07/measles-endemic-in-britain-official.html Health Direct NHS watch blog]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This immunization failure is due to parents opting out of the MMR vaccine program in the wake of the false claims that the MMR vaccine causes autism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4100287.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Adverse Reactions ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Vaccine Injury Compensation Program|Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System}}&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have substantial side effects, and many vaccines have a significant morbidity and mortality associated with them. In fiscal year 2017 alone, it is estimated that $220 million will be paid to victims of vaccines, and underpayments or improper denials of payment are common.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/05/09/whopping-vaccine-injury-payouts-us-fiscal-year-2017-released/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than Postvaccinial encephalitis is a known hazard of [[smallpox]] vaccine, for example. A recently introduced vaccine against human papilloma virus, the causative agent of cancer of the [[uterus|uterine]] cervix, has now been linked to a number of sudden deaths reported within days of its administration.&amp;lt;ref name=GardasilMM&amp;gt;Cockcroft, Lucy, &amp;quot;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/10/29/njab129.xml Cervical cancer drug Gardasil linked to deaths],&amp;quot; ''[[London]] Daily Telegraph'', October 29, 2007. Retrieved November 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bulging or swollen [[fontanelle]]s have been linked with many vaccines commonly given to infants, such as the diptheria-[[tetanus]] (DPT) vaccine. Many families, out of concern for their child's health, have sought legal justice for the potential health damage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://legaljustice4john.com/fontanellebulging.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only live attenuated vaccines can still cause infection. All vaccines can cause illness, but this is commonly a hypersensitivity reaction (similar to an allergic response), not due to the disease itself. Very rarely a serious disease known as eczema vaccinatum can be causes by the smallpox vaccine. Vaccines that use pieces of pathogens often use a carrier virus in the injection. Those with very weak immune systems that are exposed to such a vaccine can become infected with the carrier virus and develop [[eczema]]. A recent case of this was reported in the United States after a military man was vaccinated with smallpox and his two-year-old son became ill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/183349/soldier_infects_toddler_son_with_lifethreatening.html AP article on eczema vaccinatum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of vaccination reactions are deemed serious enough to contraindicate further vaccinations of the same type. These include extensive swelling and redness at the injection site, prolonged fever, bronchospasm and laryngeal [[edema]] (narrowing of the airways causing difficulty in breathing), and collapse/seizures with or without unconsciousness and/or encephalitis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/simplepage.cfm?ID=2067071044 General Practice Notebook - vaccine reactions]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Published Adverse Reaction Rates===&lt;br /&gt;
Most medical journals and the CDC are heavily influenced by vaccine manufacturers, and hence their published information about side effects are one-sided.  The packaging labels on vaccines are more candid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what the CDC and medical journals claim:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Hepatitis B Vaccine (HBV) has a .000167% chance of causing [[anaphylaxis]] upon vaccination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046738.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*There is no correlation between the HBV and multiple sclerosis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.medsafe.govt.nz/Profs/PUarticles/vaccinenews.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The Measles, Mumps, Rubbela (MMR) vaccine has a 25% chance of causing [[arthralgia]] (joint pain) and 10% chance of causing [[arthritis]]-like symptoms in women who are past puberty. This pain and stiffness begins 1–3 weeks after vaccination, persisting for 1 day to 3 weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/combo-vaccines/mmr/faqs-mmr-hcp.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*The MMR vaccine has a .00484% chance of causing [[thrombocytopenia]]. However, the measles and rubella both have much higher chances of causing thrombocytopenia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/84/3/227 E Miller et al., Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and MMR vaccine in ''Archives of Disease In Childhood'', 84:227-229]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Common Misconceptions Surrounding Vaccines ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many people assume that official vaccine recommendations are based on recommendations of independent panels of experts after reviewing risk-benefit and cost-benefit analyses. They are not. The government panels are dominated by vaccine industry representatives and they have no consumer representatives.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vaccines have injured many in the developing world, sometimes due to contamination in donated stale vaccines.  The vaccine was banned for over a year in Nigeria after concerns about safety were raised. The ban has since been lifted, but the vaccination rate remains low.{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Balbier &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Thomas E., Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 1999&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 1999-09-28 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Statement on National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program by Thomas E. Balbier, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t990928b.html &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Glezen&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = W. Paul&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2004&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Control of Influenza&lt;br /&gt;
 | volume   = 31(1)&lt;br /&gt;
 | pages    = 39-41&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = Texas Heart Institute Journal&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=387431&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = Pear&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = Robert &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Threats and Responses: Leagal Risks; For Victims of Vaccine, Winning Case Will Be Hard&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = [[The New York Times]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E2DC1E3AF937A25751C1A9649C8B63  &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = USDOJ&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2000&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2000-11-27&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = About the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.usdoj.gov/civil/torts/const/vicp/about.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2008&lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = Filing a Claim with the VICP&lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/filing_claim.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
*{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = United States Department of Health and Human Services&lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = HRSA&lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = 2007&lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = 2007-04-20 &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)  About VICP &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = United States Government&lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/ &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- *{{Harvard reference&lt;br /&gt;
 | Surname   = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Given    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Year    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Date    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Title    = &lt;br /&gt;
 | Publisher  = &lt;br /&gt;
 | URL     = &lt;br /&gt;
 }} retrieved on 2008-01-21 --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[HPV vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Injury Compensation Program]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acellular vaccine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vaccine FAQ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.909shot.com/ National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)], a non-profit anti-vaccination organization&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/uploads/Compare_Risks.pdf Compare the Risks], A PDF detailing the risks between vaccination and non-vaccination&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.site.stopjenny.com/Home.html Stop Jenny McCarthy], A site devoted to fighting vaccine misinformation, contains many vaccine related resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Medicine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Qw23</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>