<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Princecharming</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Princecharming"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Princecharming"/>
	<updated>2026-10-10T20:14:01Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_bigotry&amp;diff=730354</id>
		<title>Liberal bigotry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal_bigotry&amp;diff=730354"/>
		<updated>2009-12-13T02:24:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Princecharming: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Bigotry''' is the expression of [[hatred]] or [[aggression]] towards those who are different. Examples of bigotry include [[racism]] and [[religious intolerance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bigotry is common among [[atheists]], [[elitism|elitists]], [[liberals]], [[Muslims]] and [[homosexuals]], [[conservatives]], amongst numerous others towards critics of their ideologies. Some liberals [[deceit|deceitfully]] claim to uphold equality of all viewpoints and free speech, but are in fact routinely prejudiced against opposing viewpoints.  They are particularly bigoted against Christians (and indeed [[faith]] in general) and [[Family Values]].  It is typical to see liberals refer to their opponents as [[racism|racists]], [[fascists]], [[Nazis]], [[redneck|rednecks]], [[fanaticism|fanatics]], or any number of more profane slurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
* The infamous [[Hamilton Square Baptist Church Riot]], in which gays maliciously attacked a church.&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberal and Pro-Abortion attacks on Pregnancy Centers &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/458992.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Students threaten and verbally abuse a student wearing a McCain T-Shirt &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-kass-13-nov13,0,2881384.column?page=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gay rights]] supporters protested outside of Los Angeles' largest Mormon temple because members of the Mormon church gave millions of dollars to the campaigning for [[Proposition 8]], which banned homosexual marriage in [[California]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/mormon-stars-face-backlash-after-gay-marriage-ban-1003967.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!-- is this bigotry? --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Gay rights protesters at a pro-Proposition 8 rally tore a cross out of an elderly woman's hands and stomped on it. They then proceeded to verbally accost the woman for at least 10 minutes, some of which was on live TV&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=80711&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* An ad for the campaign against Proposition 8 depicts Mormons as a type of religious [[gestapo]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=80047&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--Bigoted? --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Radical homosexual anarchists shouted profanities and blasphemies in a Michigan church, before unfurling a banner, throwing glitter and pulling the fire alarm&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/11/12/national-press-ignores-mi-media-whitewash-lansing-church-homosexual-anar&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Someone hacked the website of the Mormon church and replaced the front page with a video of gay porn &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ldsmag.com/ideas/081110hate.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Maher]]'s movie [[Religulous]] uses lies and distortions to mock most major religions&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=76123&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[ACLU]] attempted to stop a Christian band from playing at a city festival&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=80649&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- it's not bigotry, it's their interpretation of the Constitution; even though I don't agree, a city giving money to a Christian band can easily be interpreted as &amp;quot;endorsing a religion&amp;quot;--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New York Times]] correspondent Dan Mitchell allegedly sent a harassing [[Facebook]] email to a conservative correspondent for [[World Net Daily]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/seton-motley/2008/11/03/ny-times-reporters-iat-again-facebook-miller-says-nb-contributor-vadum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!-- this, too, is not bigotry; there's no known motivation for the act, and the assumed motivation has nothing to do with bigotry --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hate speech]] laws might be able to be used to ban the Bible&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78339&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Colorado law SB200 bans discriminatory references to homosexuals, which might include the Bible &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=77383&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- I'd *really* like to see a primary source for this; where is he banning the speech? Government documents? Public schools? Private universities? Any books published in CO? Any books *distributed* in CO? --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberal [[Paul Krugman]] calls [[Republican Party]] a haven for racists &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2008/11/03/krugman-gop-haven-racists-reactionaries&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- I'm confused how this is bigoted --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberal Charles Karel Bouley calls for the death of [[Joe the Plumber]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kerry-picket/2008/11/02/lib-radio-host-karel-calls-joe-wurzelbachers-death-air-obscenity-laced&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;!-- Bouly is bigoted against plumbers? --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Al Franken]] mocks Christians&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2008/10/22/media-skipping-over-al-frankens-acidulous-mockery-christians&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Democrat]] [[John Murtha]] called his constituents rednecks.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Obama]] accuses the public of clinging to guns and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Muslims]] in India rioted when an author critcized Islam &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.times.com/books/99/04/18/specials/rushdie-riot.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Ku Klux Klan]]'s often violent activities against African Americans, Jews, homosexuals and Catholics.&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Holocaust]]; an attempted extermination of the entire European Jewish population by the [[Nazis]].&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals on the Huffington Post website attacked one of their own, a liberal Brown University student who enrolled at Liberty University to investigate the school and write a book about his experiences, when his findings conflicted with their bigoted beliefs about conservative Christian evangelicals. They also predictably attacked Christian beliefs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2009/04/22/liberal-student-infiltrates-liberty-university-write-expos-discovers-i&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/22/kevin-roose-infiltrates-l_n_190124.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:psychology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bigotry| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Princecharming</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia&amp;diff=730350</id>
		<title>Conservapedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia&amp;diff=730350"/>
		<updated>2009-12-13T02:21:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Princecharming: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| align=right border=3 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | [[Previous_Breaking_News/Conservapedia| Previous Breaking News:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Conservapedia''', launched on November 21, 2006, is a [[conservative]], [[family-friendly]] [[Wiki]] [[encyclopedia]].  It was founded by [[teacher]] and [[attorney]] [[Andrew Schlafly]] with the help of several students from his fall 2006 World History class. In May 2008, Schlafly and some of his [[homeschooling|homeschooled]] students appeared on the [[CBC]] news program The Hour (see: [[Videos on Conservapedia]] ).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a student handed in her paper using the date-markers “[[BCE]]” and &amp;quot;CE” from [[Wikipedia]], Schlafly realized that Wikipedia, despite its claim of neutrality, contained bias against the achievements of [[Christianity]] and conservatism.  Other occasions of [[liberal bias]], including the reversion of factual edits about the 2005 Kansas Evolution Hearings, led to the creation and launch of Conservapedia.  Tired of all of this bias, he soon realized the only logical step would be to create a website that was, at the very least, aware of its bias, to counteract Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Conservapedia originally contained mostly [[history]] articles, it has grown over two years to be a general reference, with information about history, [[math]], [[science]], [[politics]], [[religion]] and other topics.  It also contains [[Conservapedia:Debate Topics|debates]], [[essays]] and [[Conservapedia:Index|educational resources]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2007 it was picked up by the media, and faced a barrage of [[vandalism]] (See [[Essay:Examples of Moronic Vandalism by the &amp;quot;tolerant&amp;quot;|Examples of Moronic Vandalism by the &amp;quot;tolerant&amp;quot;]]). Ever since then, it has continued to grow, and now has [[Special:Statistics|tens of millions of page views]], and enjoys prominence on search engines.&lt;br /&gt;
== Rapid Expansion of Web Traffic Relative to Many Conservative Websites==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:TrafficGraph.png|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia was listed in May of 2009 as one of the 50 most popular conservative websites in terms of web traffic by the [[conservative]] blog Right Wing News.&amp;lt;ref name=popular50&amp;gt;[http://www.rightwingnews.com/mt331/2009/03/the_50_most_popular_websites_o.php The 50 Most Popular Conservative Websites], ''Right Wing News'', March 16, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Considering that Conservapedia was only about 3 years old in May of 2009 and was doing better in web traffic than some veteran conservative websites, the rise in web traffic for Conservapedia during its existence has been quite favorable.  In May of 2009, the website Right Wing News determined with the help of [[Alexa]] data that Conservapedia was ranked 37 out of 50 in terms of its website traffic relative to other popular conservative websites.&amp;lt;ref name=popular50/&amp;gt; Conservapedia is looking forward to greatly spreading awareness of Conservapedia via the significant expansion of its [[YouTube]] channel subscriber base at [http://www.youtube.com/user/conservapediavideos Conservapediavideos]. [[Conservapediavideos]] will likely soon feature a multitude of excellent conservative videos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leadership==&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike Wikipedia, which bills itself as a [[democratic]] system and ends up functioning as a [[mobocracy]], Conservapedia employs a hierarchy based on a [[Meritocracy|merit system]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andrew Schlafly is the chief administrator and is the most prolific editor, followed by bureaucrats, administrators, and regular editors.  Editors who contribute substantial content may be promoted to administrator and bureaucrat, or gain extra user rights such as blocking power and uploading images.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Educational atmosphere==&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the existence of essays and debates on Conservapedia, and conventions such as the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|&amp;quot;90/10 rule&amp;quot;]] and the use of real names, Conservapedia successfully fosters an [[education]]al environment. Because liberal bias is not allowed, much information that would be elsewhere censored can be found on Conservapedia; often it is one of the only places to find such information in one place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Promoting Original Scholarship ==&lt;br /&gt;
Many pages tagged as essays are really more like projects, or are otherwise thought-provoking, giving Conservapedia some characteristics of a [[think tank]]. See [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words|Best New Conservative Words]], [[Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America|The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America]], [[Essay:Top Causes of Rejecting Conservativism|Top Causes of Rejecting Conservativism]], [[Mystery:Why Do Non-Conservatives Exist?|Why Do Non-Conservatives Exist?]], [[Disputed Biblical Translations]], and [[Linguistic Analysis of Candidates]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Conservative Bible Project ===&lt;br /&gt;
On August 12, 2009, Conservapedia began an enormous scholarly enterprise, the [[Conservative Bible Project]], which endeavors to retranslate scripture into modern English while emphasizing Biblical insights and counteracting liberal bias.  As of Oct. 29, 2009, this project has translated about 30% of it, or about 2400 verses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project has been the subject of extensive discussion and debate throughout television, radio, and print media, as well as on the internet, and has succeeded in encouraging even its most strident liberal critics to read the bible in their efforts to refute it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Differences with Wikipedia==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia strives to keep its articles concise, informative, family-friendly, and true to the [[fact]]s, which often back up conservative ideas more than [[liberal]] ones.  Rather than claim a neutral point of view and then insert bias, Conservapedia is clear that it seeks to give due credit to conservatism and Christianity. Schlafly said in regard to the point of view issue, &amp;quot;It's impossible for an encyclopedia to be neutral. I mean let's take a point of view, let's disclose that point of view to the reader.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert Siegel. [http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=8286084 Conservapedia: Data for Birds of a Political Feather?], npr.org, November 29, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia articles may contain [[trivia]], [[gossip]], profanity, and even [[Pornography|pornographic]]/sexually explicit images.  The latter three are prohibited on Conservapedia and trivia is largely discouraged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The administrative hierarchy prevents Conservapedia from being hijacked by a faction, and thus preserves it from mobocracy, as discussed above.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Influential editors and users==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] is the username of the aforementioned founder of Conservapedia, Andrew Schlafly. He has contributed massively to Conservapedia since the beginning, authored many articles including the [[World History Lectures|student lectures]], and is the final authority on article content and user conduct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]], active at Conservapedia for over a year, and at Wikipedia for seven years, was the first elected bureaucrat at Wikipedia and has been extremely influential at both sites.  At Conservapedia, he has primarily aimed at accuracy, rationality, and user cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] has contributed the majority of content to the extremely popular [[evolution]], [[atheism]], and [[homosexuality]] articles.  The first two articles were featured as articles of the year at Conservapedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Joaquín Martínez|Joaquín Martínez]] has contributed a large amount of content about the [[art]]s, such as pages on [[literature]], [[sculpture]], and [[painting]]. He created the [[Painting Masterpieces|galleries of artwork]] which are featured on Conservapedia's [[Main_Page|Main page]] as the &amp;quot;Masterpiece of the Week&amp;quot;. His work has helped beautify the encyclopedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Jpatt | Jpatt]] another hardcore conservative contributor despised by liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:TK|TK]] has made many substantive contributions since coming to Conservapedia over two years ago, and is known for his vigilance against vandals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:DeanS|DeanS]] helped found the Conservapedia news project, and he is its main contributor. He has also worked on articles related to [[Mormonism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:SharonS|SharonS]] has been an editor since the very beginning of Conservapedia, and was interviewed and quoted in a newspaper article to explain and defend the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:AddisonDM|AddisonDM]] works on maintenance, and in addition to neutral contributions has created the popular article [[Essay:Examples of Moronic Vandalism by the &amp;quot;tolerant&amp;quot;|Examples of Moronic Vandalism by the &amp;quot;tolerant&amp;quot;]], as well as the Conservapedia article itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:RobSmith|RobSmith]] Created some of Conservapedia's most acclaimed articles, and was a tireless vandal fighter and researcher on the [[Socialist]] and [[Communist]] agendas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] has a PhD in American Studies and has been a professor of history and political science at numerous schools. Professor Jensen has made significant contibutions to Conservapedia's historical articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Testimonies and Impact==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia has been praised and ridiculed in the [[media]], on [[blog]]s, and on rival sites.  Critics claim that it contains fringe viewpoints, and supporters note that it simply provides another viewpoint and an alternative to liberal bias.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Conservapedia provides information about the [[American]] people that liberal critics would rather hide: for example, nearly 50 percent of Americans reject evolution and embrace [[creationism]], and even more want creationism taught alongside evolution in school. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bootie Cosgrove-Mather. [http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/11/22/opinion/polls/main657083.shtml Poll: Creationism Trumps Evolution], ''CBS News'', November 22, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Another example is the fact that atheists- often claiming to be more equipped to help their fellow men than religious people- actually give less to charity than believers, even when church giving is excluded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Search results for controversial subjects such as [[atheism]] and [[evolution]] contain Conservapedia links within a few searches and often on the first page.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS293US293&amp;amp;q=atheism&amp;amp;btnG=Search atheism - Google Search]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;rlz=1B3GGGL_enUS293US293&amp;amp;q=theory+of+evolution&amp;amp;btnG=Search theory of evolution - Google Search]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Many biographical articles contain religious references and information about the person’s religion, much more so than Wikipedia.  Editor and college student Tasha Jones, ([[User:Taj|Taj]]) said of this aspect, “It gives me a better understanding of how people feel religion relates to our lives.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stephanie Simon. [http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jun/19/nation/na-schlafly19 A conservative's answer to Wikipedia], ''Los Angeles Times'', June 19, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Conservapedia is active in political advocacy. For example, it [[charter]]ed a bus for the 2009 [[March for Life]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Conservapedia is currently developing a blog for the [[Cardinal Mindszenty Foundation]]. The blog in its prototype form can be found here: http://mindszentyfoundation.blogspot.com/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Commandments|Conservapedia Commandments]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:About|About Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Articles mentioning Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Videos on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Special:ListUsers/Siteadmin|List of Site Admins]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservapedia]][[Category:Conservative]][[Category:Websites]][[Category:Wikis]]&lt;br /&gt;
contributions&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Princecharming</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Censorship&amp;diff=730348</id>
		<title>Censorship</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Censorship&amp;diff=730348"/>
		<updated>2009-12-13T02:19:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Princecharming: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Censorship''' is the suppression of statements or information for ideological reasons.  Current examples include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*the banning of [[prayer]] in the classroom&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[classroom prayer]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*the removal of conservative bias from Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
*the rejection of [[pro-life]] advertisements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., &amp;quot;[[Canadian]] City Backpedals on Decision to Censor [[Pro-life]] Bus-shelter Ads.&amp;quot; [http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jun/08060506.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*the banning of mention of [[intelligent design]] in school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See, e.g., [[Expelled:No Intelligence Allowed]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Censorship can also take the form of ostracizing students for expressing [[pro-life]] or other [[conservative]] views.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See, e.g., [[liberals and friendship]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*protesting and disrupting invited conservative speakers on campuses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nysun.com/new-york/at-columbia-students-attack-minuteman-founder/41020/ At Columbia, Students Attack Minuteman Founder] Ny Sun,  October 5, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Censorship is sometimes based on a misuse of [[copyright]], as in the unsuccessful attempt to censor the movie [[Expelled:No Intelligence Allowed]] about [[intelligent design]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7432860.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*the destruction of [[conservative]] newspapers on college campuses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thebulletin.us/site/index.cfm?newsid=19383118&amp;amp;BRD=2737&amp;amp;PAG=461&amp;amp;dept_id=576361&amp;amp;rfi=8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Censorship of [[conservative]] [[talk radio]] via the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Internet censorship]] employed by a country, which can include such things as the filtering of anti-government sites in [[China]] or the censoring of [[women's rights]] or anti-[[Islam]] sites in [[Middle East|Middle Eastern]] countries&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Schools banning books from their Libraries.  see  [http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/misc/mosaic/common/omega/Web/People/spok/most-banned.html/ List of banned books]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Political censorship involves a government preventing information from reaching its citizens. Perhaps the most well-known contemporary example of this is China's censorship of the [[Google]] search engine, known as the &amp;quot;Golden Shield Project&amp;quot;, which prevents Google from displaying search results of some human rights websites,  websites promoting Tibetan independence, references to the 1989 Tianamen Square protests, and others. A famous example in fiction is George Orwell's novel ''[[Nineteen Eighty-Four]]'', in which the main character works as a civil servant in the department responsible for altering or destroying historical information which the government wishes to keep secret. The rationale behind political censorship is that the political party in power can protect itself from revolution if the public is kept uninformed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''censorship''' derives from ''censor'', the title of the Roman official who conducted the census and supervised public morality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The First Amendment and censorship in the U. S.==&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, the [[First Amendment]] states that &amp;quot;Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.&amp;quot; Broadly speaking, the First Amendment is designed to prevent the government from exercising censorship.  However, the government sometimes censors political and religious speech anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More specifically, the government should not exercise &amp;quot;prior restraint.&amp;quot; That is, a citizen should not need advance permission from the government in order to publish something, unless it threatens [[national security]]. This does not mean that publication may not have consequences: a citizen can be sued for publishing [[libel]], or incarcerated for disclosing military secrets, but the consequences typically occur ''after'' publication, not before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Censorship is sometimes applied to prohibit obscenity that goes against common standards of public [[morality]]; under US law the first amendment does not protect material considered legally obscene. The definition of obscenity has and continues to vary, with the current Supreme Court definition being the [[Miller test]]. In practical terms, this allows harmful material such as pornography to be criminalized without violating the first amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Censorship may also be directed at religious ideas, as in the Saudi Arabia prohibition on preaching Christianity, liberal restrictions on public expressions of religion or the Roman Catholic Church's now-recinded ''Index Librorum Prohibitorum''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain language and images that may have been censored in the past are typically common fare in the American media today. On the other hand, while nudity, for example, may be acceptable on mainstream French television, that is much less likely to be accepted in American television and even less acceptable in conservative Muslim countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
*''All censorships exist to prevent anyone from challenging current conceptions and existing institutions. All progress is initiated by challenging current conceptions, and executed by supplanting existing institutions. Consequently the first condition of progress is the removal of censorship.'' '''[[George Bernard Shaw]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Author's Apology, preface to &amp;quot;Mrs. Warren's Profession&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal censorship]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Traits]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Princecharming</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminism&amp;diff=730347</id>
		<title>Feminism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminism&amp;diff=730347"/>
		<updated>2009-12-13T02:17:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Princecharming: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Braque woman 400pix.jpg|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Feminism''' originally was an expression used by [[suffragettes]] - who were predominantly [[pro-life]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.godlessprolifers.org/library/wallace4.html ''Susan B. Anthony opposed abortion'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;There is no question that she deplored the practice of abortion, as did every one of her colleagues in the suffrage movement.&amp;quot;'' [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/13/opinion/13schiff.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin ''Desperately Seeking Susan''] [[New York Times]] (13 October 2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.feministsforlife.org/history/foremoth.htm ''Voices of our Feminist Foremothers''] Feminists for Life&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; - to obtain the right for women to vote in the early 1900s in the [[United States]] and the [[United Kingdom]].  By the 1970s, however, [[liberals]] had changed the meaning to represent people who favored [[abortion]] and identical roles or quotas for women in the military and in society as a whole.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, a modern feminist tends to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* believe that there are no meaningful differences between men and women (The most significant belief underlying contemporary feminism is that there are no [[sex differences]]; therefore advocacy for [[equal rights]] must be extended to advocacy for [[equal results]] or outcomes.)&lt;br /&gt;
* oppose [[chivalry]] and even feign insult at harmless displays of it (see [[battle between the sexes]])&lt;br /&gt;
* view traditional [[marriage]] as unacceptably patriarchal&lt;br /&gt;
* detest women who are happy in traditional roles, such as housewives,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Being a [[housewife]] is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of  [[radical feminism]] is to change that.&amp;quot; - Vivian Gornick, University of Illinois, &amp;quot;The Daily Illini,&amp;quot; April 25, 1981. [http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/LAF_Theme_Articles_13/You_Don_t_Know_Feminism_744100744.shtml         &amp;quot;You Don't Know Feminism&amp;quot;] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and especially dislike those who defend such roles&lt;br /&gt;
* shirk traditional gender activities, like baking or sowing clothes for the men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;But sometime between the Ides of March and Canada Day, I remembered that I'd given up baking cookies as a political act in 1975. ... No self-respecting feminist could be found in the company of cookie dough.&amp;quot; [http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&amp;amp;id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* support [[affirmative action]] for women&lt;br /&gt;
* prefer that women wear pants rather than dresses, presumably because men do&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[T]he wearing of pantsuits is often a useful feminism signifier, depending on the culture of the law firm.&amp;quot; [http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=2640]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;I was part of a growing tribe of pesky women called feminists by friends and enemies alike.  We women stormed out the door in our imitation men's suits ....&amp;quot; [http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&amp;amp;id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* seek [[women in combat]] in the military just like men, and coed submarines&lt;br /&gt;
* refuse to take her husband's last name when marrying&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;(Almost half the married women in the Harvard-Radcliffe class of 1990 kept or hyphenated their names.) If you read the New York Times wedding pages, and shut up, you do, the phrase 'the bride, who is keeping her name' seems like the norm, unless his name is Rockefeller. http://dir.salon.com/story/mwt/feature/2003/10/16/names/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* distort historical focus onto female figures, often overshadowing important events (Eg: Henry VIII's wives take precedence in common knowledge to his actual reign.)&lt;br /&gt;
* object to being addressed as &amp;quot;ma'am,&amp;quot; or feminine nicknames such as &amp;quot;sweetheart&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;honey&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-talk-boxer-maamjun19,0,5804401.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; object to other female-only names, such as &amp;quot;temptress&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
Roots of the movement in the United States and the United Kingdom include the [[suffrage|Women's Suffrage]] movement of the early 1900's and the [[Women's Liberation]] (or &amp;quot;Second Wave Feminist&amp;quot;) movement of the 1960's and 1970's.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Equal Rights Amendment]], which proponents claimed would address the inadequacies of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] concerning women and citizenship, was proposed in the US in 1923.  The amendment passed Congress in 1972 but was ultimately defeated, falling just three states short of the required [[three-quarters majority]] on June 30, 1982. Some conservatives, particularly [[Phyllis Schlafly]], felt that its passage would entail adverse consequences, including making girls subject to the [[military draft]], requiring taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] the end of [[single-sex schools]] and classes, requiring the issuance of [[homosexual marriage]] licenses, and the revocation of laws that protect women in dangerous jobs, such as factory or mining work.  Indeed, in states that passed their own state versions of ERA, several of these results were subsequently ordered by courts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the [[Hawaii]] and [[Massachusetts]] Supreme Courts ordered the issuance of homosexual marriage licenses based in part on their on their state ERAs, and the [[New Mexico]] Supreme Court ordered taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] based on its state ERA.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The feminist movement in the West evolved in the 1980s with the rise of so-called [[Post-Feminism]] (also called &amp;quot;[[Third-Wave]]&amp;quot; feminism), which stresses that women have many rights that go unrecognized, often by women themselves, in everyday life, and in the American legal structure. Most members of the feminist movement support reproductive rights currently guaranteed by American law, including the legal right to [[abortion]]. This stance is opposed by many conservatives, leading political commentator [[Rush Limbaugh]] to coin the term &amp;quot;Femi-nazis&amp;quot; to refer to extreme feminist activists. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the administration of [[Bill Clinton]], feminism made a partial resurgence, although feminist leadership was criticized{{who}} for largely failing to criticize President Clinton's [[sexist]] behavior toward female employees as both Arkansas Governor and U.S. President.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Odone, Christina [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article528875.ece ''Left-wing misogyny is alive and well: The party’s feminist agenda allows Labour men to get away with sexist behaviour''] (2 June 2005) [[The Times]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, Candice E. ''&amp;quot;Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine&amp;quot;'' (World Ahead Publishing; 2005) ISBN 0-9746-7013-8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], a staunch advocate of [[civil rights]] and [[non-violence]] said, &amp;quot;When a mother has to work she does violence to motherhood by depriving her children of her loving guidance and protection.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Stride Toward Freedom : The Montgomery Story'', Martin Luther King, Jr., Harper and Rowe, New York, 1958, p. 203.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Larrey Anderson, philosopher, writer and submissions editor for American Thinker, links feminism to Marxism, and concludes, &amp;quot;Feminism by grounding itself in the philosophy of Hegel and Marx, is condemning women to a new servitude: slavery to the state.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larrey Anderson, ''The Feminine Mistake'', American Thinker], November 29, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotations== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Robin Morgan]]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I feel that 'man-hating' is an honourable and viable political act, that the [[oppressed]] have a right to [[class-hatred]] against the class that is oppressing them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/LGB.asp From] &amp;quot;Sisterhood is Powerful&amp;quot;(1970)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero-sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary-vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In addition to doing the sh*twork that women have been doing for generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don't mean that. Yes, I really do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://circuitous.org/scraps/combahee.html From] her introduction to &amp;quot;Sisterhood is Powerful&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.feministcampus.org/network/chat/morgan04232003.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_/ai_n9357217 From] &amp;quot;Sisterhood is Powerful&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_199903/ai_n8831317 From] &amp;quot;Theory and Practice: Pornography and Rape&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Andrea Dworkin]]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LfaWZ&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/LGB.asp From] her book &amp;quot;Letters from a War Zone&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LfaWZ&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;In my own life, I don't have intercourse. That is my choice.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andrea Dworkin: [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4024585,00.html &amp;quot;'They took my body from me and used it'&amp;quot;] (Guardian Unlimited)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Q: People think you are very hostile to men. A: &amp;quot;I am.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/WarZoneChaptIID.html &amp;quot;Nervous Interview&amp;quot;], 1978 (Background: &amp;quot;Norman Mailer managed to publish lots of interviews with himself, none of which made much sense, all of which were taken seriously by literati of various stripes. So this is half parody of him and his chosen form and half parody of myself and my chosen movement.&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Men use the night to erase us.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;TNaD&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/WarZoneChaptIb.html The Night and Danger]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The annihilation of a woman's personality, individuality, will, character, is prerequisite to male sexuality.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;TNaD&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Marilyn French]]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Marilyn French.gif|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women ... he can sexually molest his daughters ... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE&amp;quot; - ''The War Against Women'', p. 182 (her emphasis)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/034538248X/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;All patriarchists exalt the home and family as sacred, demanding it remain inviolate from prying eyes. Men want privacy for their violations of women ... All women learn in childhood that women as a sex are men's prey&amp;quot; - ''The War Against Women'', p. 186 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/034538248X/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The media treat male assaults on women like rape, beating, and murder of wives and female lovers, or male incest with children, as individual aberrations ... obscuring the fact that all male violence toward women is part of a concerted campaign&amp;quot; - ''The War Against Women'', p. 21 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/034538248X/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In fiction authored by [[Marilyn French]]====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter&amp;quot; - ''The Women's Room''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;All men are rapists and that's all they are&amp;quot; - The character Mia in her novel ''The Women's Room'', p. 462&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0345353617/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The nuclear family must be destroyed ... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process&amp;quot; - Linda Gordon &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women ... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men ... All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft&amp;quot; (from &amp;quot;The Declaration of Feminism&amp;quot; November, 1971) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The feminista agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a [[socialist]], anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, [[abortion|kill their children]], practice [[witchcraft]], destroy capitalism, and become [[lesbian]]s&amp;quot; - Pat Robertson, fundraising letter, 1992&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gainesvillehumanists.org/patr.htm &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The people I'm furious with are the Women's Liberationists. They keep getting up on soapboxes and proclaiming women are brighter than men. That's true, but it should be kept quiet or it ruins the whole racket&amp;quot; - Anita Loos &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex&amp;quot; - [[Valerie Solanas]], author of the SCUM Manifesto (Society for Cutting Up Men) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things&amp;quot; - Jilly Cooper&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage&amp;quot; - Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist&amp;quot; - Ti-Grace Atkinson &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice&amp;quot; - Ti-Grace Atkinson &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;It matters more what's in a woman's face than what's on it.&amp;quot; - Claudette Colbert, quoted in Kindling the Spirit by Lois P. Frankel &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear&amp;quot; - Susan Brownmiller; Authoress of Against Our Will p.6 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression&amp;quot; - Sheila Jeffrys &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; Universities of Michigan &amp;amp; Yale) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in ''Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men&amp;quot; - Sharon Stone, Actress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Ninety-five percent of women's experiences are about being a victim. Or about being an underdog, or having to survive ... women didn't go to Vietnam and blow things up. They are not [[Rambo]]&amp;quot; - Jodie Foster, Actress - as quoted in The New York Times Magazine &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race&amp;quot; - Sally Miller Gearhart, in ''The Future - If There Is One - Is Female'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual (male), it may be mainly a quantitative difference&amp;quot; - Susan Griffin, Rape: The All-American Crime &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males&amp;quot; - Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If anyone is prosecuted for filing a false report, then victims of real attacks will be less likely to report them&amp;quot; - David Angier &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;To use the word [rape] carefully would be to be careful for the sake of the violator, and the survivors don't care a hoot about him. &amp;amp;hellip; They [men unjustly accused of rape] have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what they say I did?' Those are good questions.&amp;quot; - Catherine Comins, assistant dean of student life at Vassar in 1991 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,973077-6,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it&amp;quot; - Barbara Jordan, former congresswoman &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release&amp;quot; - [[Germaine Greer]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Man-hating is everywhere, but everywhere it is twisted and transformed, disguised, tranquilized, and qualified. It coexists, never peacefully, with the love, desire, respect, and need women also feel for men. Always man-hating is shadowed by its milder, more diplomatic and doubtful twin, ambivalence&amp;quot; - [[Judith Levine]], Authoress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I feel what they feel: man-hating, that volatile admixture of pity, contempt, disgust, envy, alienation, fear, and rage at men. It is hatred not only for the anonymous man who makes sucking noises on the street, not only for the rapist or the judge who acquits him, but for what the Greeks called philo-aphilos, 'hate in love' for the men women share their lives with - husbands, lovers, friends, fathers, brothers, sons, co-workers.&amp;quot; - [[Judith Levine]], Authoress of My Enemy, My love &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;There are no boundaries between affectionate sex and slavery in (the male) world. Distinctions between pleasure and danger are academic; the dirty-laundrylist of 'sex acts' ... includes rape, foot binding, fellatio, intercourse, auto eroticism, incest, anal intercourse, use and production of pornography, cunnilingus, sexual harassment, and murder&amp;quot; - Judith Levine; summarizing comment on the WAS document (A Southern Women's Writing Collective: Women Against Sex) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*((Delaney Nickerson, of the American Coalition for ABUSE AWARENESS, refers to the False Memory Syndrome Foundation as &amp;quot;The F---ing Molesters Society&amp;quot; (Miami Herald, April 3, 1995) The ACAA is a lobbying group, which includes Ellen Bass (co-author of THE COURAGE TO HEAL), and Rene Frederickson, leading feminist psychotherapist and strong proponent of repressed memory theory)) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*((At the STONE ANGELS satanic ritual abuse conference in Thunder Bay in February, 1995, the following was contained in the handouts at a conference supported financially by the Ontario Government: FMS stands for: FULL OF MOSTLY SH*T; FOR MORE SADISM; FELONS, MURDERERS, SCUMBALLS; FREQUENT MOLESTERS SOCIETY)) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Women have their faults / men have only two: / everything they say / everything they do&amp;quot; {{Fact|Date=March 2008}} -- Popular Feminist Graffiti &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I was, in reality, bred by my parents as my father's concubine... What we take for granted as the stability of family life may well depend on the sexual slavery of our children. What's more, this is a cynical arrangement our institutions have colluded to conceal&amp;quot; - Sylvia Fraser, Journalist &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catharine MacKinnon]] maintains that &amp;quot;the private is a sphere of battery, marital rape and women's exploited labor.&amp;quot; In this way, privacy and family are reduced to nothing more than aspects of the master plan, which is male domination. Democratic freedoms and the need to keep the state's nose out of our personal affairs are rendered meaningless. The real reason our society cherishes privacy is because men have invented it as an excuse to conceal their criminality. If people still insist that the traditional family is about love and mutual aid - ideals which, admittedly, are sometimes betrayed - they're &amp;quot;hiding from the truth&amp;quot; The family isn't a place where battery and marital rape sometimes happen but where little else apparently does. Sick men don't simply molest their daughters, they operate in league with their wives to &amp;quot;breed&amp;quot; them for that purpose - Donna Laframboise; The Princess at the Window (in a critical explication of the Catharine MacKinnon, [[Gloria Steinem]] et al, tenets of misandric belief) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If the classroom situation is very heteropatriarchal - a large beginning class of 50 to 60 students, say, with few feminist students - I am likely to define my task as largely one of recruitment ... of persuading students that women are oppressed&amp;quot; - Professor Joyce Trebilcot of Washington University, as quoted in Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Men, as a group, tend to be abusive, either verbally, sexually or emotionally. There are always the exceptions, but they are few and far between (I am married to one of them). There are different levels of violence and abuse and individual men buy into this system by varying degrees. But the male power structure always remains intact.&amp;quot; - Message on FEMISA, responding to a request for arguments that men are unnecessary for a child to grow into mature adulthood. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Another posting on FEMISA: &amp;quot;Considering the nature and pervasiveness of men's violence, I would say that without question, children are better off being raised without the presence of men. Assaults on women and children are mostly perpetrated by men whom they are supposed to love and trust: fathers, brothers, uncles, grandfathers, step-fathers.&amp;quot; (Both above quotes taken from Daphne Patai's excellent critical work, [[Heterophobia]]) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;At Brandies I discovered Feminism. And I instantly became a convert... writing brilliant papers in my Myths of Patriarchy class, in which I likened my fate as a woman to other victims throughout the ages.&amp;quot; {{fact}} - Heather Hart 7 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Here are 10 reasons why we are concerned about feminism and the National Organisation for Women &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. &amp;quot;The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist&amp;quot; - National NOW Times, January, 1988 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &amp;quot;Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage&amp;quot; - feminist leader Sheila Cronan &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. In response to a question concerning China's policy of compulsory abortion after the first child, Molly Yard responded, &amp;quot;I consider the Chinese government's policy among the most intelligent in the world&amp;quot; - Gary Bauer, &amp;quot;Abetting Coercion in China&amp;quot; The Washington Times, Oct. 10, 1989 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;Overthrowing capitalism is too small for us. We must overthrow the whole ... patriarch!&amp;quot; - [[Gloria Steinem]], radical feminist leader, editor of Ms. Magazine &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women.... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men ... All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft&amp;quot; (from &amp;quot;The Declaration of Feminism&amp;quot; November, 1971) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;By the year 2000 we will, I hope, raise our children to believe in human potential, not God&amp;quot; - [[Gloria Steinem]], editor of Ms. Magazine) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. &amp;quot;Let's forget about the mythical Jesus and look for encouragement, solace, and inspiration from real women ... Two thousand years of patriarchal rule under the shadow of the cross ought to be enough to turn women toward the feminist 'salvation' of this world&amp;quot; - Annie Laurie Gaylor, &amp;quot;Feminist Salvation,&amp;quot; The Humanist, p. 37, July/August 1988 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. &amp;quot;In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them&amp;quot; - Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College, and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. &amp;quot;Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family- maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of radical feminism is to change that&amp;quot; - Vivian Gornick, feminist author, University of Illinois, The Daily Illini, April 25, 1981 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. &amp;quot;The most merciful thing a large family can to do one of its infant members is to kill it&amp;quot; - Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, in &amp;quot;Women and the New Race&amp;quot; p. 67 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Women's chains have been forged by men, not by anatomy.&amp;quot; - Estelle R. Ramey &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I would have girls regard themselves not as adjectives but as nouns.&amp;quot; - Elizabeth Cady Stanton, &amp;quot;Our Girls&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men&amp;quot; - [[Elizabeth Cady Stanton]], from her diary of December 27, 1890, quoting a letter she wrote. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=CIsEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA270&amp;amp;lpg=PA270&amp;amp;dq=%22we+are+as+a+sex+infinitely+superior+to+men%22&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=FqYVyWK-s6&amp;amp;sig=tnXoiGvopCcO1vFaoF7nmSvtXPM&amp;amp;hl=en#PPA270,M1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 'A feminist Dictionary; ed. Kramarae and Triechler, Pandora Press, 1985: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*MALE: ... represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants ... the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*MAN: ... an obsolete life form ... an ordinary creature who needs to be watched ...a contradictory baby-man ... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*TESTOSTERONE POISONING: ... 'Until now it has been though that the level of testosterone in men is normal simply because they have it. But if you consider how abnormal their behavior is, then you are led to the hypothesis that almost all men are suffering from &amp;quot;testosterone poisoning&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Letter to editor: &amp;quot;Women's Turn to Dominate&amp;quot; &amp;quot;... Clearly you are not yet a free-thinking feminist but rather one of those women who bounce off the male-dominated, male-controlled social structures. Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether they suffer? They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it. Now it is our turn. My only comment to men is: if you don't like it, bad luck - and if you get in my way I'll run you down&amp;quot; Signed: Liberated Women, Boronia Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia. 9 February, 1996 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*“Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism” - Catharine MacKinnon&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The English novelist and critic [[Rebecca West]] said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/rebecca_west.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; : &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;I myself have never been able to find out what feminism is; I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat or a prostitute.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti-Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminism and housewives]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist style]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gender equality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gender police]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminists for Life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminism and reason]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Battered woman syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|small}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/ The Feminist eZine] Archive of articles about Feminist History.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cia-on-campus.org/surveil/steinem.html Gloria Steinem and the CIA], ''The New York Times'', February 21, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg02217.html Inside the CIA with Gloria Steinem], Nancy Borman,  ''The Village Voice''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.american.com/archive/2008/march-april-magazine-contents/why-can2019t-a-woman-be-more-like-a-man Why Can't a Woman Be More Like a Man?], Christina Hoff Sommers, ''The American'' March/April 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Feminism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Princecharming</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>