<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Pila</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Pila"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Pila"/>
	<updated>2026-10-15T00:01:52Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_Belichick&amp;diff=686203</id>
		<title>Bill Belichick</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bill_Belichick&amp;diff=686203"/>
		<updated>2009-07-25T05:13:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pila: hey guys, what's going on in this wiki?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:PatsBillGeorgeBush.jpg‎ |thumb|160px|Bill Belichick (right) at the [[White House]] with President [[George W. Bush]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Bill Belichick''' (born April 16, 1952 in Nashville, [[Tennessee]]) is the head coach of the [[New England Patriots]]. He is one of the most successful coaches and greatest defensive masterminds in [[NFL]] history. With one of the best postseason records in NFL history, it is no surprise that he has coached three [[Super Bowl]] winning teams in his professional career (2001, 2003, 3004); all of them while coaching the Patriots. Prior to being the Patriots coach he was a assistant coach on the [[New York Giants]] when they won two Super Bowls (1986, 1990), and in 1991 became the head coach of the [[Cleveland Browns]]. He remained as the head coach of the Browns until 1995. In 2000, the Patriots traded their first round [[2000 NFL Draft]] choice to the [[New York Jets]] to acquire Belichick as their head coach. Currently Belichick is the longest tenured NFL head coach with over 32 years of coaching.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New_England_Patriots#Spying_Incident|Spying Incident]]&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==  &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.patriots.com/team/index.cfm?ac=coachbio&amp;amp;bio=506 Patriots Bio]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New England Patriots]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:National Football League Coaches]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Belichick, Bill}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pila</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Arabic_numerals&amp;diff=526664</id>
		<title>Arabic numerals</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Arabic_numerals&amp;diff=526664"/>
		<updated>2008-09-30T15:08:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pila: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Arabic numerals''' consist of the [[number system]] most commonly used in the world:  0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;Arabic numeral&amp;quot; is a [[misnomer]] that originated in 1847.  The more accurate term is &amp;quot;Hindu-Arabic numeral&amp;quot;, as the origin of the numerals is [[Hinduism]] in [[India]] between 400 B.C. and A.D. 400.  The only connection with Arabs is that they communicated this system to [[Europe]] in the A.D. 900s, through Arabian [[mathematics|mathematicians]].  Most Arabs did not use these Indian numerals.{{fact}} It was [[Fibonacci]], the Italian mathematician, who was finally successfull in introducing the Arabic numbers to Europe, around 1200 A.D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indians first defined the value of zero (0), which is necessary for writing numbers in this way.&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:mathematics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pila</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:PNAS_Response_to_Letter&amp;diff=516053</id>
		<title>Talk:PNAS Response to Letter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:PNAS_Response_to_Letter&amp;diff=516053"/>
		<updated>2008-09-13T21:26:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pila: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Notice: misrepresentations are not going to be allowed on this page.  Substantive comments only, please.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this day and age, scientists have their own agenda and have corrupted science. Just look at global warming or cloning or stem cells as proof. With that said, the only way to get the real truth is by suing in court. Unfortunately, scientists are bound to vast wealth and have the power to defend themselves vigorously. If ever a fund was set up to pay for a suit, I would contribute. It is a classic case whereby the truth be known, the truth will prevail. -- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 22:14, 12 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Thanks, Jpatt.  One additional beauty of the truth is that it remains the truth no how much some deny it.  PNAS can deny its errors all it likes, but that doesn't change the fact they are errors.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:21, 12 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well said, Andy and Jpatt. It is perhaps worth pointing out that the President of the NAS is a &amp;quot;climate scientist&amp;quot;. If the Academy is dominated by [[pseudoscience]] of that kind, it's hardly a surprise that their response was to cover up and deny the truth. Nevertheless, they had to be given their chance to make good before further steps are taken. I suggest now that the issue be put to potentially supportive congressmen/women and senators, given the public funding for Lenski's activities. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 05:46, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Right.  The next step is to criticize the taxpayer funding of this junk science.  When the authors and the publishing organization will not even address statistical errors in the work, then it's time to pull the public funding.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:13, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::They did address your claims of statistical errors: they said that you were wrong to the degree that they were able to determine what you were talking about. You made a qualitative argument and got a qualitative response.--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 11:00, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: Which of the 5 specific errors do you think they addressed?  None, as far as I can tell.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:11, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The response addresses your qualitative claims about the paper's statistical methods raised in points two, three, and five by the following:&amp;quot;Nevertheless, from a statistical point of view, it is proper to combine the results of independent experiments, as Blount et al. '''did correctly in their original paper'''&amp;quot;(emphasis added); in fact the longest paragraph in the response deals entirely with the statistical claims of the letter and dismisses them.--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 11:32, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::But that's never going to happen because the data availability requirements for public funding have already been met. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 11:03, 13 September 2008 (EDT)10:56, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::: No, I don't think the researchers have met NSF guidelines as referenced in the letter.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:11, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proof?[[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 11:26, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: As I said, the NSF guidelines are references in the [[Letter to PNAS|letter]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:29, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You mean the notebooks and ect? [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 11:32, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh my dear God, I can't believe this!! Where has this beautiful country gone to if even science is not reliable anymore nowadays. Hope things will change in the future. Good thing there still are people like Mr. Schlafly, &amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;suckadick moron&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;who have the brains and power to stand up, and turn the people of America in the right direction again. [[User:Raul|Raul]] 12:24, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Schlafly, I have a question BTW. Was this letter received on a paper, or electronically? Because if it was on a paper, perhaps it would be a good idea to scan it, and post it. It would add a lot to the encyclopedic value of the article. [[User:Raul|Raul]] 12:26, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: PNAS procedures required me to submit the letter electronically using its own electronic submission software.  When the PNAS acknowledged that my submission complied with all its requirements, it also said that the authors of the original paper had been notified of my letter.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:39, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Too bad. It doesn't make much sense though, guess that tells a lot about PNAS. What they should care about is the actual text, not the medium it is in. That's not the case IMHO for encyclopedias however. If not for anything else, a scan would have been useful as a reference for the digital text. Oh well... [[User:Raul|Raul]] 12:53, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Honest question, is it against the rules to disagree with Andrew Schlafly or criticize that letter? I just want to know so I don't end up in the same situation as other people who have been censored here.--[[User:IanG|IanG]] 17:03, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe this this page is only for discussion of the response, which is quite straightforward.  Criticism of the letter should have gone on it's talk page, but it's too late now.  Oh well.  There is no censorship on Conservapedia.  Your comment is not substantive - please refactor it. Praise jesus, [[User:Pila|Pila]] 17:26, 13 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pila</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=PZ_Myers&amp;diff=514894</id>
		<title>PZ Myers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=PZ_Myers&amp;diff=514894"/>
		<updated>2008-09-12T01:30:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pila: /* Communion host */ you can't desecrate the god delusion, and desecrating the koran is harder than it looks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Paul Zachary Myers''', better known as '''PZ Myers''', is an [[evolutionist]] activist in the [[creation-evolution controversy]], contributing to [[The Panda's Thumb (blog)|The Panda's Thumb]] and [[Pharyngula (blog)|Pharyngula]] blogs.  Myers is also an associate [[professor]] of [[biology]] at the [[University of Minnesota Morris]] (UMM)&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;citypages&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://citypages.com/databank/26/1303/article13908.asp?page=1 ''The Mad Scientist''] City Pages, Volume 26 - Issue 1303, November 23, 2005 Cover story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PZ Myers commented, while listening to [[Michael Behe]] lecture on [[Intelligent design]], that &amp;quot;In science, we scream a lot.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;citypages&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  According to ''Evolution News'', he opposes democratically-elected school boards deciding how evolution should be taught; feeling that it should instead be done by &amp;quot;Scientists with years of training in the subject, and qualified science teachers who understand the fundamentals of the theory.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Egnor, Michael [http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/12/pz_myers_darwinists_know_whats.html ''P.Z. Myers: Darwinists Know What’s Best for Your Children''] Evolution News December 18, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Militant atheism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Myers is an outspoken [[atheism|atheist]] who has openly advocated the elimination of religion, likening it to illiteracy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.atheistrev.com/2008/03/pz-myers-on-eliminating-religion.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
His language is extremely militant at times, and laced with expletives.  In a diatribe in which he described those who believe in the Bible as &amp;quot;lunatics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;bigots,&amp;quot; Myers said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|I say, screw the polite words and careful rhetoric. It's time for scientists to break out the steel-toed boots and brass knuckles, and get out there and hammer on the lunatics and idiots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20070420142719/http://pharyngula.org/index/weblog/comments/perspective/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PZ Myers frequently rants against religion, religious people, and religious institutions (e.g. churches) on his blog. Myers has called evangelical Christianity &amp;quot;a blight upon the earth,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/03/left_or_right_religion_and_pol.php/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; religious people &amp;quot;ignorant, deluded, wicked, foolish, or oppressed victims of obsolete mythologies,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/07/im_surrounded.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and considers every church to be a &amp;quot;parasitic institution that contributes nothing to the tax base and encourages further ignorance in the population.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2007/07/how_do_you_save_small_town_cha.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unsurprisingly, Myers' radical, hateful views on religion and religious people are [[Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia|whitewashed from the Wikipedia article about him]] by pro-evolution/anti-Creationism/anti-Intelligent Design editors who are his fans. Also, the page that describes Conservapedia on Wikipedia, PZ Meyers is listed as a critic of Schlafly for his (Schlafly's) pursuit of Lenski's raw data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Debating ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2008, Myers participated in a debate with Discovery Institute fellow Geoffrey Simmons on KMMS. He was unable to counter criticisms of the fossil record, in particular the absence of transitional forms in the whale fossil record. Geoffrey was invited back for an hour long talk the next week. PZ Myers now refuses to debate creation scientists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rk5Y3VoBeVQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== ''Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed'' ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Myers appeared in the film ''[[Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed]]''. In the film, Myers compared religion to knitting and said it should be nothing more than &amp;quot;something fun that people get together and do on the weekend and really doesn't affect their life as much as it has been so far.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHiZjOH1NmQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Up to and after the release of the film, PZ Myers viciously attacked the film and its makers many times and engaged in bizarre behavior. Two of the most notable incidents involved his failed attempt to gate-crash a showing of the film at the [[Mall of America]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/science/21expelledw.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and his crashing and disruption (including plugging himself) of a conference call held by ''Expelled'''s producers after calling in early (likely to eavesdrop) and overhearing and then dishonestly using the phone code that allowed two-way communication.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYAblaZmogA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/i_always_aim_to_misbehave.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Most bizarrely, in the latter incident, Myers interruption of the producers' call began with his referring to himself in the third person, probably in an attempt to conceal both his identity and the fact that he used a phone code he was not authorized to use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Communion host ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 8, 2008, PZ Myers posted an entry attacking Roman Catholic beliefs regards Communion.  He was reacting to a news story, in which a student at the University of Central Florida described a physical confrontation over his failure to consume a communion wafer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;'Body Of Christ' Snatched From Church, Held Hostage By UCF Student, July 5, 2008[http://www.wftv.com/news/16798008/detail.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;'Body Of Christ&amp;quot; Returned To Church After Student Receives Email Threats, July 7, 2008[http://www.wftv.com/news/16806050/detail.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After ridiculing some people as &amp;quot;petty, hateful, and stupid,&amp;quot; and asserting that &amp;quot;nothing makes them stupider than religion,&amp;quot; Myers requested that his readers steal consecrated Communion wafers for him, so that he could desecrate them on camera.  This rant predictably resulted in a strongly negative response from Catholics and those who support freedom of religious expression &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicleague.org/release.php?id=1459&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; Myers has since complained about the &amp;quot;hate mail&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;death threats&amp;quot; he has received, comparing the defense of Communion to a &amp;quot;witch hunt.&amp;quot;  To date, the University of Minnesota has not taken official action against Myers for his inflammatory remarks, other than to remove the link to his blog from his faculty page.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicleague.org/release.php?id=1460&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; PZ Myers followed through with his threat, desecrating a eucharist and tearing out pages of a copy of the [[Koran]] and a copy of [[Richard Dawkins]]' ''The God Delusion''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://discoverthefaith.com/2008/07/26/update-on-professor-myers-desecration-of-eucharist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, Myers posted two vitriolic emails he had received and included the email addresses where they supposedly had come from. Predictably, his readers responded with their own threatening and harassing emails even though at the time it was not clear whether or not the email addresses (one of which was allegedly from someone at 1-800-Flowers) had been spoofed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The husband of the user of the the 1-800-Flowers address subsequently owned up to sending the e-mail. (http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/071608-woman-fired-over-death-threat.html) The account owner was fired by the company. Myers commented on the firing, saying, &amp;quot;She apparently did something stupid, which I don't have sympathy for. I would just rather not see people getting fired over an e-mail message.&amp;quot; (http://www.networkworld.com/news/2008/071608-woman-fired-over-death-threat.html?page=2)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Myers attempted to save face, claiming that the unsurprising behavior by his readers was not the intent behind his posting of the email addresses, and called for his readers to stop &amp;quot;dunning these people with email, threatening them back, signing them up for spam, or otherwise being a jerk.&amp;quot; These pleas fell on deaf ears, while PZ Myers continued to avoid doing the obvious thing in simply removing the email addresses from his blog.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/07/stop_it_now_please.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/07/mail_dump.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.scienceblogs.com/pharyngula Pharyngula]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Myers, Paul Zachary}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biologists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pila</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>