<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Patriot61</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Patriot61"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Patriot61"/>
	<updated>2026-10-11T15:53:21Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Deliberate_ignorance&amp;diff=475603</id>
		<title>Deliberate ignorance</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Deliberate_ignorance&amp;diff=475603"/>
		<updated>2008-06-16T18:19:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Patriot61: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Deliberate ignorance''' is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions.  Examples include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Howard Dean]], a physician, former Governor, and longtime politician, refusing to recognize that [[taxpayer-funded abortion]] increases the number of [[abortion]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* refusing to acknowledge the inferior credentials of the critics of [[Richard Sternberg]], whom they ostracize for having published an [[intelligent design]] article&lt;br /&gt;
* refusing to acknowledge the inferior credentials of the critics of [[Richard Lenski]], whom they insist provide full data for public scrutiny without providing details of their method of scrutiny&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters&lt;br /&gt;
* [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/two_tales_of_whale_evolution.php here].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity&lt;br /&gt;
* [[abortionists]] refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have [[abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that there is a verifiable link between Al-Quaida and Iraq, so we must invade, although all evidence points to the contrary.&lt;br /&gt;
(add more)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common expressions of [[deliberate ignorance]] include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I find that hard to believe!&amp;quot; (Howard Dean, June 11, 2008, in response to a fact ignored by [[liberals]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I'm not aware of that!&amp;quot; (without admitting a failure to look)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I've never seen that in the news!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;That's not what it said in my ([[public school]]) textbook!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Let's talk about something else!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I'm not interested in that!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;They hate us for our freedom!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Complete suspension of disbelief!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crime of Deliberate Ignorance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Deliberate ignorance''' can be a crime.  For example, jurors were instructed &amp;quot;to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/05/11/enron_jury_to_consider_deliberate_ignorance/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:philosophy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Patriot61</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Deliberate_ignorance&amp;diff=475602</id>
		<title>Talk:Deliberate ignorance</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Deliberate_ignorance&amp;diff=475602"/>
		<updated>2008-06-16T18:18:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Patriot61: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I just wanted to say how happy I am that it is OK to post insults about active, helpful editors. It's the reason I edit here; they don't allow that kind of thing at Wikipedia. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:12, 19 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: HelpJazz, feigning &amp;quot;insult&amp;quot; is an example of [[liberal style]].  Relax.  Also, there is no evidence that you are a &amp;quot;libertarian&amp;quot; and we've rejected self-labels here long ago.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:14, 19 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(unacceptable language deleted)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that there are no citations for these examples of deliberate ignorance, also would it be possible for a sysop to create a category for cryptology realted articles [[User:MCollins|MCollins]] 12:33, 20 March 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;I've never heard that in the New York Times&amp;quot; is extremely biased, as the NYT is only read by 20 percent of the population (according to conservapedia). Why not change it to, &amp;quot;the news?&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Patriot61</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Deliberate_ignorance&amp;diff=475597</id>
		<title>Deliberate ignorance</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Deliberate_ignorance&amp;diff=475597"/>
		<updated>2008-06-16T18:13:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Patriot61: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Deliberate ignorance''' is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions.  Examples include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Howard Dean]], a physician, former Governor, and longtime politician, refusing to recognize that [[taxpayer-funded abortion]] increases the number of [[abortion]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* refusing to acknowledge the inferior credentials of the critics of [[Richard Sternberg]], whom they ostracize for having published an [[intelligent design]] article&lt;br /&gt;
* refusing to acknowledge the inferior credentials of the critics of [[Richard Lenski]], whom they insist provide full data for public scrutiny without providing details of their method of scrutiny&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters&lt;br /&gt;
* [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/two_tales_of_whale_evolution.php here].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity&lt;br /&gt;
* [[abortionists]] refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have [[abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that there is a verifiable link between Al-Quaida and Iraq, so we must invade, although all evidence points to the contrary.&lt;br /&gt;
(add more)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common expressions of [[deliberate ignorance]] include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I find that hard to believe!&amp;quot; (Howard Dean, June 11, 2008, in response to a fact ignored by [[liberals]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I'm not aware of that!&amp;quot; (without admitting a failure to look)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I've never seen that in [[Fox News]]!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;That's not what it said in my ([[public school]]) textbook!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Let's talk about something else!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I'm not interested in that!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;They hate us for our freedom!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Complete suspension of disbelief!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crime of Deliberate Ignorance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Deliberate ignorance''' can be a crime.  For example, jurors were instructed &amp;quot;to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/05/11/enron_jury_to_consider_deliberate_ignorance/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:philosophy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Patriot61</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Deliberate_ignorance&amp;diff=475454</id>
		<title>Deliberate ignorance</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Deliberate_ignorance&amp;diff=475454"/>
		<updated>2008-06-16T14:28:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Patriot61: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Deliberate ignorance''' is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions.  Examples include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Howard Dean]], a physician, former Governor, and longtime politician, refusing to recognize that [[taxpayer-funded abortion]] increases the number of [[abortion]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/210vssua.asp?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* refusing to acknowledge the inferior credentials of the critics of [[Richard Sternberg]], whom they ostracize for having published an [[intelligent design]] article&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters&lt;br /&gt;
* [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/two_tales_of_whale_evolution.php here].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity&lt;br /&gt;
* [[abortionists]] refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have [[abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Advocates of the [[global warming theory]] refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestrial air temperature than human activity.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that there is a verifiable link between Al-Quaida and Iraq, so we must invade, although all evidence points to the contrary.&lt;br /&gt;
*The claim that unrestricted profits do not harm America&lt;br /&gt;
(add more)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common expressions of [[deliberate ignorance]] include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I'm not aware of that!&amp;quot; (without admitting a failure to look)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I've never seen that in the [[New York Times]]!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;That's not what it said in my ([[public school]]) textbook!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Let's talk about something else!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I'm not interested in that!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;They hate us for our freedom!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Crime of Deliberate Ignorance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Deliberate ignorance''' can be a crime.  For example, jurors were instructed &amp;quot;to consider whether ... former Enron Corp. executives deliberately ignored accounting fraud as the energy trader fell into bankruptcy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/05/11/enron_jury_to_consider_deliberate_ignorance/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:philosophy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Patriot61</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>