<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Ospin2</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Ospin2"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Ospin2"/>
	<updated>2026-11-12T18:49:09Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=1673285</id>
		<title>Christianity</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christianity&amp;diff=1673285"/>
		<updated>2020-08-01T20:31:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Christianity}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Christianity''' is the world's largest [[religion]], having 2.5 billion followers in 2020.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.gordonconwell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2019/04/StatusofGlobalChristianity20191.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In terms of its geographic distribution, Christianity is the [[Global Christianity|most globally]] diverse religion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/08/27/many-religions-heavily-concentrated-in-one-or-two-countries/ Many religions heavily concentrated in one or two countries]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://wwwgordonconwell.com/netcommunity/CSGCResources/ChristianityinitsGlobalContext.pdf Christianity in its global context]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Christianity has always been the best way to turn one's life around, to achieve more, to overcome [[addiction]], and to enjoy life to a greater extent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christian denominations like Protestantism are the only religion that emphasizes justification by [[faith]] rather than works, and brings God closest to mankind through [[Jesus]] as the Son of [[God]].  Literally, Christianity means &amp;quot;of Christ,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;belonging to Christ,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;being like Christ.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=2661&amp;amp;dict=CALD Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sermoncentral.com/sermons/christian-means-like-christ-bruce-ball-sermon-on-apologetics-general-84109&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The early Christian faith was sometimes called ''That Way'', (Acts 19:1,9,23; 24:22), and its adherents were also called ''Nazarenes'' (Acts 24:5), evidently after the city of [[Nazareth]] where Jesus lived.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Acts of the Apostles|Book of Acts]] (Acts:11:26) records that &amp;quot;the disciples were called Christians first in [[Antioch]].&amp;quot; The title ''Christian'' is also used in Acts 26:28 and 1 Peter 4:16. Christians believe in [[God]], the [[virgin birth|virginal conception and the virginal birth of Jesus Christ]], the bodily [[resurrection of Jesus Christ]], [[Heaven]], survival of the [[soul]] after death, the [[Parousia|Second Coming of Jesus]], the [[resurrection]] of the dead, the [[Last Judgment]], the reality of [[Hell]], and the teachings of [[Jesus Christ]] as written in the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Main Christian Divisions ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Anglican Christ Church.jpg|thumb|left|150px|Anglican Christ Church in Western Australia]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''The three largest self-governing bodies of Christians are:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Roman Catholic Church]] (approx. 1.1 billion baptized members) traces its roots back to [[Saint Peter]] whom Catholics believe was appointed as the first leader of the church by [[Jesus Christ]] and the succession of [[Pope]]s as the spiritual leaders of Christendom. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Orthodox Church]]es (approx. 300 million baptized members) trace their roots back to the Apostles, in the five ancient [[patriarchate]]s of the undivided Church of the first millennium of her history, known as the [[Pentarchy]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://orthodoxwiki.org/Pentarchy Pentarchy (orthodoxWiki.org)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and are organized in [[Autocephalous]] national or regional churches in communion with each other. The Pentarchy consisted of the Churches of [[Church of Rome|Rome]], first in dignity of honor, [[Church of Constantinople|Constantinople]], [[Church of Alexandria (Coptic)|Alexandria]], [[Church of Antioch|Antioch]], and [[Church of Jerusalem|Jerusalem]]. Differing theological perspectives and the growing development of the doctrine of [[Petrine primacy]] in the Church of Rome led to the [[Great Schism]] between the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Churches in A.D. 1054. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Protestantism]]: the largest Communions are the [[Anglican Church|Anglicans]] (approx. 115 million baptized members) and the [[Lutheran]] World Federation (approx. 68 million baptized members). Protestantism has its origins in the European [[Reformation]]. The Protestant movement broke from the Roman Catholic Church under [[Martin Luther]] when differences over the nature of [[faith]] and works in the role of [[Christianity#salvation|salvation]], as well as other practices of the Catholic Church that Luther saw as unBiblical, were raised.  Within Protestantism are four major branches:&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mainline]], which comprise many of the major denominations outside of the [[Baptist]]s.  These denominations usually have [[high church]] services and have increasingly become liberal in their theology and ecumenical in their dealings with other churches, even outside Protestantism.&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pentecostal]], these groups are generally conservative in their theology, and are known primarily for their emphasis on the [[Baptism in the Holy Spirit]] as a separate event from salvation, and [[Glossolaia|speaking in tongues]].&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fundamentalist]], these groups are very conservative theologically, but are better known for their emphasis on &amp;quot;separation&amp;quot; from both the world (bordering on, if not crossing over, into [[legalism]]) and groups who do not believe as they do (which often includes other fundamentalist groups).&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Evangelical]], this term tends to be a catch-all for a church or denomination not falling into one of the other three categories, but generally also holding to traditional Christian theology.  Most [[non-denominational church]]es are generally evangelical, as well as the largest Protestant denomination, the [[Southern Baptist Convention]].  As the name suggests, they have a major emphasis on Christian evangelism.  They are also known for their belief that Christians should be active in the political arena, opposing such political views as abortion and homosexual marriage; in this arena they will work with any group -- Protestant or otherwise -- who will work with them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christian Beliefs ==&lt;br /&gt;
Christian beliefs [[Christian apologetics|are well supported via a large body of compelling evidence]].  Theologians, over two millennia, have debated a definitive summary of the Christian faith. While its interpretations vary drastically, probably the most commonly accepted statement of the faith is the [[Nicene Creed|Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians and Christian denominations agree on many points of doctrine while disagreeing on some. According to an online Harris poll from 2003, 99% of all American Christians believe in [[God]], 96% in the [[resurrection of Jesus Christ]], 93% in [[Heaven]], 93% in the virgin birth, 92% in the survival of the soul after death, 82% in [[Hell]], 50% in ghosts, 27% in astrology and 21% in reincarnation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Note that the latter two beliefs are in opposition to the religious tenets of most Christian denominations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed offers a general overall picture of what Christian theology looks like, and serves as a useful outline and historic standard. Other creeds may prove helpful in research. See the [[Apostles' Creed]] and the [[Athanasian Creed]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===God===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|God}}&lt;br /&gt;
God is a triune being.  Though there is only one Divine nature there are three Divine Personages: The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  The three Persons are collectively called the [[Trinity]] or the Holy Trinity. While God is tripartite, this does not imply that Christians are polytheists.  The doctrine of the Trinity is central to Christian theology, although several denominations that usually are considered Christian are non-Trinitarian. The God of the Christian is the creator of all things, is everywhere present, exists in all times, is transcendent, all-knowing (omniscient), just, and all-powerful (omnipotent).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A major theme of the Bible is [[love]].  In the Hebrew [[Old Testament]] the idea is expressed in the Hebrew word ''hessed'', which is variously translated as loyal love, tender mercy, steadfast love, mercy, goodness, etc.  in the [[New Testament]] the same idea is expressed in the Greek word ''[[agape]]'', which translates to love, compassion and charity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Jesus===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus' Baptism.jpg|180px|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the reign of [[Augustus Caesar|Caesar Augustus]] the Son (i.e. the second Person of the Trinity) took flesh from a virgin woman and was incarnated as a man. He was born in the town of [[Bethlehem]] and was given the name [[Jesus]].  At approximately the age of thirty he was baptised by his cousin [[John the Baptist]] and began to preach in the area of [[Judea]] and [[Galilee]]. About three years later, his teachings and works of mercy prompted the Jewish authorities to plot Jesus' death. Jesus was [[crucified]]. He rose from the dead and was seen by over 500 people. He ascended to Heaven. The four [[Gospels]] contain the basic account of what Jesus did and said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus summarized his moral teachings in two commandments from the Old Testament:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.' This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.' On these two commandments depend the whole Law and the Prophets&amp;quot;. ([[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 22:37-39; [[Book of Deuteronomy|Deuteronomy]] 6:5; Leviticus 19:18) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The night he celebrated his [[Last Supper]] with the Twelve Apostles before he suffered, he gave a new commandment:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; even as I have loved you, that you also love one another.&amp;quot; ([[Gospel of John|John]] 13:34)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
The fundamental principle in Christian moral teaching is [[love]] and forgiveness, as expressed by the life and teachings of Jesus Christ and the New Testament. In the Hebrew [[Old Testament]] the idea is expressed in the Hebrew word ''hessed'', which is variously translated as loyal love, tender mercy, steadfast love, mercy, goodness, etc.  in the [[New Testament]] the same idea is expressed in the Greek word ''agape'', which is variously translated as love, compassion, charity, etc.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has been endless debate over how a person should express love for God in his or her moral behavior. This moral dialogue found expression in the New Testament, where the [[Apostle Paul]] addressed such controversies as [[circumcision]] ([[Epistle to the Romans|Romans]] 2:25-29), eating meat that was sacrificed to [[pagan]] deities (1 Corinthians 8), speculating about myths and genealogies (1 Timothy 1:3-5), and observing ceremonial dates and seasons (Galatians 4:9-11). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless of a person's ethical interpretations, adherents commonly point to New Testament passages John 3:16 and 1 Corinthians 13:4-7 as scriptural depictions of love. The former states that &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; The latter characterizes love, saying &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Love is patient, love is kind and is not jealous; love does not brag and is not arrogant, does not act unbecomingly; it does not seek its own, is not provoked, does not take into account a wrong suffered, does not rejoice in unrighteousness, but rejoices with the truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ affirmed, &amp;quot;By this all men will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one another&amp;quot;. (John 13:35) In trying to understand the reason for the growth of Christianity in a pagan culture, it has been noted that while love of one's neighbor is not an exclusively Christian virtue, it appears that the primitive Christian church practiced it much more effectively than any other group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.R. Dodds, 1970:136-137&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to sacrificially showing care for those within the community as well as to those without, (cf. Gal. 6:10) the Christians elevated the sanctity of life, opposing abortion, infanticide, child abandonment, suicide, and gladiatorial contests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kenneth Scott Latourette, ''A history of Christianity'' p. 244&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ted Cabal, Chad Owen Brand, Paul Copan, The Apologetics Study Bible, 274&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  While the primitive church tolerated the existing and pervasive cultural economic institution of slavery in the [[Roman Empire]], the mandate of equal pay and just treatment (Col. 4:1; Eph. 6:9) greatly ameliorated the treatment of slaves, while advising them to seek freedom if possible, (1Cor. 7:21) and requiring that the escaped slave Onesimus be received back not &amp;quot;as a servant, but above a servant, a brother beloved&amp;quot;. (Philemon 1:6)  The Christian ethos of love also motivated a great expansion in the building of hospitals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Albert John Ochsner, Meyer Joseph Sturm, ''The organization, construction and management of hospitals'', p. 17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roderick E. McGrew, ''Encyclopaedia of Medical Care'',  p. 135&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By A.D. 500, most large towns in in the Roman Empire had erected them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George D. Pozgar, ''Legal aspects of health care administration', p. 2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Atonement===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dalí The Christ of St. John of the Cross.jpg|thumb|The Christ of St. John of the Cross by [[Salvador Dalí]], 1951.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Christians believe with the New Testament that the death of Jesus, in conjunction with His resurrection, is an indispensable event for the reconciliation of lost sinners with God. There are three elements they see to the understanding of His death on the cross.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Jesus having the knowledge that His path would lead to his own death, desired and willed that that take place, and persevered in that path though there was opportunity for Him to avoid it. &amp;quot;I have power to take my life and I have power to lay down my life. I lay down my life for the sheep&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Jesus saw that in His death there would be a way for people to be brought back to the God from whom they were alienated and lost because of their sins. This would involve a substitution of Himself to effect, i.e. atone for, that development. &amp;quot;For the Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve and give His life as a ransom for many&amp;quot;.  How this would take place was not new to the Jews of His day from their understanding of contemporary everyday practice of substitute payment - as in redemption of the first-born (Pidyon Ha Ben), or in the understanding of what aggadic stories such as the Binding of [[Isaac]] implied (see [[Midrash]]), but it was not the prevalent view that the Messiah was to be that payment. Though while alive on earth, he had hinted at it in sayings such as &amp;quot;unless a seed falls and dies, it remains alone, but when it dies, it brings forth.&amp;quot;; it was only after He had risen from the dead that He explained Scripture (the Old Testament) clearly about the necessity of His death to have taken place. The disciples would henceforth preach, and Peter among them, that the death of Jesus the Messiah and His resurrection was for-planned and for-ordained by God the Father, and foretold in the Scripture (Isaiah 53). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Christians of all generations have looked to the perfect Atonement, and the hope for reconciliation, accomplished by Jesus on the cross, to provide the means of understanding the solution to the vexing problems of the mind and of life itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Salvation===&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible teaches that &amp;quot;all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God&amp;quot;. (Romans 3:23) This is often interpreted to mean that everyone has displeased God and is now separated from him in a kind of alienation and enmity that results from the fundamental conflict between selfish human interests and God's interests (Romans 8:5-8; James 4:4). Jesus offered a solution to this Biblical dilemma in that, by repentance of sins and faith in him (Jesus), their sins would be forgiven. He said that &amp;quot;...the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins&amp;quot;. ([[Gospel of Mark|Mark]] 2:10) Jesus also said, &amp;quot;I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance&amp;quot;. (Mark 2:17).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus Christ taught that &amp;quot;unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God&amp;quot;. ([[Gospel of John|John]] 3:3)  Protestant Evangelical Christianity often uses the terms &amp;quot;saved&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;born again&amp;quot; to mean conversion, with conscious acknowledgment of immediate divine juridical exoneration of all guilt, complete amnesty and full eternal pardon issued on acceptance of the redemptive, saving sacrifice of Jesus dying on the cross in the place of each guilty sinner (Hebrews 1:3; 7:25-27), while other Christians, such as the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church, use the phrase ''born again'' as a synonym for [[baptism|baptized]], referring to the [[sacrament]] of baptism through which the divine life of God in the blood of Jesus is actually infused by the power of his grace directly into the soul of the baptized by the washing of water with the word (Ephesians 5:25-27) and is entirely healed of the eternal deadly effect of all past sins, effecting an ontological change of spiritual birth by washing away the defect of sin, the power of God unto salvation flowing abundantly through the passion, death and resurrection of Jesus, through whom the baptized is united to Him and actually partakes of the divine nature (2 Peter 1:4). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christians are expected to continue living by Christ's teachings (John 8:31), as is appropriate for &amp;quot;children of Light&amp;quot;. (Ephesians 5:8-10) Some believe that this is necessary in order to be saved. Others say that this is a common misconception of the text, that it refers instead to the &amp;quot;fruits&amp;quot; of saving faith. Still others say that the free, unmerited gift of salvation from sin and death in hell must be maintained or retained by actively producing the fruits of [[corporal and spiritual works of mercy]] according to ability, or it will be lost (Ephesians 2:8-10; Hebrews 6:4-8), unless before death the fallen away believer repents and returns (James 5:19-20; 1 John 5:16-17). Christians in the [[Reformed]] tradition (following the teaching of the 16th century French lawyer and theologian [[John Calvin]]) say that salvation [[Eternal security (salvation)|cannot be lost]]. One Bible passage often cited is John 10:28-29 in which Jesus said of his own Apostles that they could not be snatched from his hand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resurrection of Jesus Christ ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Jesus resurrected.jpg|thumb|left|200px|&amp;quot;The Resurrection&amp;quot; by Carl Heinrich Bloch]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[resurrection of Jesus Christ]] is critical to the Christian faith.  The Apostle Paul wrote, &amp;quot;if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain&amp;quot; (I Cor:15:14).  Traditionally, Christianity has believed in a physical resurrection of Jesus Christ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/text/cri/cri-jrnl/crj0056a.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent history, [[Gary Habermas]] is considered a leading [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] for defending the resurrection of Jesus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/dialog_rexperience/dialog_rexperiences.htm Experiences of the Risen Jesus: The Foundational Historical Issue in the Early Proclamation of the Resurrection], ''Dialog: A Journal of Theology'', Vol. 45; No. 3 (Fall, 2006), pp. 288-297.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Wildcat&amp;quot; and Holding, J.P., [http://www.tektonics.org/books/lichabrvw.html Book review of &amp;quot;The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus&amp;quot;], 22nd June, 2004 (Tektonics)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://faculty.gordon.edu/hu/bi/Ted_Hildebrandt/NTeSources/NTArticles/CTR-NT/Habermas-Resurrection1-CTR.pdf Jesus' Resurrection and Contemporary Criticism: An Apologetic] ''Criswell Theological Review'' 4.1 (1989) 159-74.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/crj_explainingaway/crj_explainingaway.htm Explaining Away Jesus' Resurrection: The Recent Revival of Hallucination Theories], Christian Research Journal / vol. 23, no. 4, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Habermas, Gary, [http://www.apologetics.com/default.jsp?bodycontent=/articles/historical_apologetics/habermas-nt.html Why I Believe The New Testament Is Historically Reliable] (Apologetics.com)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Other notable defenders of the resurrection include: [[William Lane Craig]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Craig, William Lane, [http://www.leaderu.com/offices/billcraig/menus/historical.html Articles: Historical Jesus]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Lee Strobel]], [[Josh McDowell]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McDowell, Josh, [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/josh2.html Evidence for the Resurrection], 1992.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Edwin M. Yamauchi]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jamauchi, Edwin M., [http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/articles/yama.html Easter: Myth, Hallucination, or History?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[N.T. Wright]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wright, N.T., [http://www.ntwrightpage.com/Wright_Early_Traditions.htm Early Traditions and the Origins of Christianity], ''Sewanee Theological Review'' 41.2, 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Michael Horner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horner, Michael, [http://www.michaelhorner.com/articles/resurrection/index.html Did Jesus Really Rise from the Dead?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The  Meaning of the Resurrection for Christians===&lt;br /&gt;
The fact of the Resurrection of Christ is also believed to produce certain effects on the lives of Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. It is because Jesus rose from the dead that believers now can resort to a living Savior to help and deliver them from sin and from situations overwhelming for them by their own powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The New Testament sees in the resurrection of Christ a certain vindication of what apparently to the world and to all beings was a failure and an overcoming of Him by His crucifixion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The coming of Jesus back to life means to the believer that, indeed, his sins are totally forgiven. This is because believers know that His death was as a payment for sins - a &amp;quot;wage of death&amp;quot; for our sins that He received in our stead. If He remained dead, believers would know that the wage had not been fully paid. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. It is a now-living Savior that Christians know can go before them, can closely lead them through life &amp;amp;mdash; as He did when He was on earth. This makes following Him practical and real. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The New Testament reveals that it is the Risen Christ who received from the Father the Holy Spirit and He, through Himself, ascended to the Father, has given the Holy Spirit to us. This gives the believer in Christ both the knowledge and the power to live a godly life and live a life that can be an intimately and personally directed one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The resurrected Christ was no mere reassembling of the molecules and particles of the Body that had been crucified. It was, indeed, a physical body, but one that was fully glorified. It was a &amp;quot;spiritual body&amp;quot;. Christians know that likewise, they will one day be granted the nature of a spiritual body, and be full of health. They therefore are full of hope and consolation, and consider that, even now in this life, there is an overcoming through Him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Worship and the Sacraments==&lt;br /&gt;
Christians normally attend worship services at once a week, typically on Sundays.  Some denominations, such as the [[Seventh Day Adventist]]s, worship on Saturdays.  Commonly, [[megachurch]]es often hold services on both Saturday evenings and Sunday mornings to accommodate growing crowds.  More conservative denominations, such as independent Baptists and churches of Christ, hold services on Sunday evenings and Wednesday evenings as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Catholic]] and [[Eastern Orthodox]] denominations have seven sacraments: [[baptism]], [[eucharist]], [[confirmation]], [[Sacrament of Penance and Reconciliation|confession]], [[Anointing of the Sick|anointing of the sick]], [[marriage]], and [[Holy Orders|holy orders]].  Of these, Protestants observe only baptism and eucharist as sacraments,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The term &amp;quot;eucharist&amp;quot; is rarely used within Protestant circles; common terms include Communion (often used in more traditional denominations) and The Lord's Supper (more frequent in conservative denominations who consider Communion to be a Catholic term).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which are the only two for which they find Scriptural support.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Although Protestants, especially conservative ones, hold to high views of marriage and believe it is taught in the Bible, they do not consider it to be a sacrament.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evangelism==&lt;br /&gt;
In what is called the [[Great Commission]], Jesus sent his disciples out into the world to preach the Gospel (literally &amp;quot;good news&amp;quot;) and make disciples.&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Great Commission'''&lt;br /&gt;
:''But the eleven disciples proceeded to [[Galilee]], to the mountain which Jesus had designated. When they saw Him, they worshiped Him; but some were doubtful. And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, &amp;quot;All authority has been given to Me in [[heaven]] and on [[earth]].&amp;quot; Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the [[#God the Father|Father]] and the [[#God the Son|Son]] and the [[#God the Holy Spirit|Holy Spirit]], teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.&amp;quot;'' --[[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]] 28:16-20 [[New American Standard Bible|NASB]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gleyre The Departure of the Apostles.jpg|thumb|240px|The Departure of the Apostles by [[Charles Gleyre]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Internet Evangelism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Internet evangelism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Campus Crusade for Christ International (CCCI) is one of the world's largest evangelism organizations within Christendom and has over 25,000 full-time missionaries. In 2006, Alan Beeber of CCCI predicted that internet evangelism will result in more conversion that all other forms of evangelism for CCCI combined.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lausanneworldpulse.com/pdf/issues/LWP0206.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At [[YouTube]], Christians and Christian creationists have faced problems with [[atheist bullying|atheist cyberbullies]], but they [[Essay: Sharing your Christian/creationist videos on the internet|have developed methods to overcome this problem]]. [[Eternal Word Television Network]] (EWTN) is a worldwide broadcast and internet online and Facebook ministry proclaiming Jesus Christ as Lord 24 hours a day with [[Christian apologetics]] programs, News Nightly news broadcast from a Catholic Christian perspective, The World Over with Raymond Arroyo, and daily broadcast worship and prayer seven days a week four times a day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ewtn.com&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;https://www.facebook.com/ewtnonline&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; EWTN claims to be the largest religious media network in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explosive growth of worldwide Christianity ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hong Kong Christians at Gateway Camp.jpg|thumbnail|left|200px|[[Hong Kong]] Christians at Gateway Camp. In 2005, there were four times as many non-Western World Christians as there were [[Western World]] Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [https://www.flickr.com/photos/mckln/4815046728/in/set-72157624550425162 Flickr], see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/deed.en license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Global Christianity]] and [[Internet evangelism]] and [[Evangelical Christians]] and [[Resources on becoming a Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christianity has seen tremendous growth over its 2000-year history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://users.adam.com.au/bstett/BChristianIncrease12.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Christianity has recently seen explosive growth outside the [[Western World]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://pewforum.org/Christian/Faith-and-Conflict-The-Global-Rise-of-Christianity.aspx The global rise of Christianity - Pew Forum]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077 Is Christianity taking over the planet?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://pewforum.org/Religion-News/The-stunning-growth-of-Christianity-in-China.aspx The stunning growth of Christianity in China]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://gratefultothedead.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/the-african-apostles-how-christianity-exploded-in-20th-century-africa/ The African apostles: How Christianity exploded in 20th century Africa]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2000, there were twice as many non-Western Christians as Western Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077 Is Christianity taking over the planet?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2005, there were four times as many non-Western Christians as there were [[Western World]] Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There are now more non-Western missionaries than Western missionaries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wnd.com/?pageId=30077&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011, the ''American Spectator'' declared concerning research published in the ''International Bulletin of Missionary Research'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The report estimates about 80,000 new Christians every day, 79,000 new [[Islam|Muslims]] every day, and 300 fewer [[atheism|atheists]] every day. These atheists are presumably disproportionately represented in the [[Western World|West]], while religion is thriving in the Global South, where [[Charismatic movement|charismatic Christianity]] is exploding.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://spectator.org/archives/2011/02/28/thriving-christianity&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite strong persecution in the [[Middle East]], thousands of [[Muslims]] are turning to Christ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/01/11/thousands-muslims-reportedly-turning-to-christ-in-middle-east.html Thousands of Muslims reportedly turning to Christ in Middle East]. ''Fox News'' (from ''The Christian Post''). January 11, 2017. Retrieved January 14, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: The Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hoffman Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane.jpg|thumb|left|110px|[[Jesus Christ|Christ]] in the Garden of Gethsemane by Heinrich Hofmann.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible records that that, at least initially, the church saw itself as united. In the community:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...they continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. {43} And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles. {44} And all that believed were together, and had all things common; {45} And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need. {46} And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.&amp;quot;(Acts 2:42-47; 4:32) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This community was soon &amp;quot;scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles,&amp;quot; due to determined persecution which resulted in the dispersed disciples going &amp;quot;every where preaching the word.&amp;quot; (Acts 8:1,4) Christian communities were primarily to be found in two separate cultural and liguistic entities—the Greek and Latin-speaking empires of Europe and the mid-east, and the Aramaic speaking sphere of the Parthian empire of the mid-east and far-east. This latter sphere encompassed not only the eastern portions of Syria, the Arabian peninsula, and Persia, but also extended to portions of southern India and even China. To this day there are many [[Aramaic Church]] members in the Kerala province of south India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Church Community and Commitment: the Post-Biblical Period==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Orthodox churches icon artwork.jpg|thumb|left|200px|Orthodox Church's icon artwork.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Justin martyr  100 A.D. - 165 A.D.   From the &amp;quot;First Apology&amp;quot; (Defense)&lt;br /&gt;
''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But we, after we have thus washed him who has been convinced and has assented to our teaching, bring him to the place where those who are called brethren are assembled, in order that we may offer hearty prayers in common for ourselves and for the baptized [illuminated] person, and for all others in every place, that we may be counted worthy, now that we have learned the truth, by our works also to be found good citizens and keepers of the commandments, so that we may be saved with an everlasting salvation. Having ended the prayers, we salute one another with a kiss. There is then brought to the president of the brethren bread and a cup of wine mixed with water; and he taking them, gives praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, and offers thanks at considerable length for our being counted worthy to receive these things at His hands. And when he has concluded the prayers and thanksgivings, all the people present express their assent by saying Amen. This word Amen answers in the Hebrew language to genoito [so be it]. And when the president has given thanks, and all the people have expressed their assent, those who are called by us deacons give to each of those present to partake of the bread and wine mixed with water over which the thanksgiving was pronounced, and to those who are absent they carry away a portion. (Chapt. LXV - administration of the sacraments)&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And this food is called among us Eukaristia [the Eucharist = the Thanksgiving], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man who believes that the things which we teach are true, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined. For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh. For the apostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, &amp;quot;This do ye in remembrance of Me, this is My body;&amp;quot; and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, &amp;quot;This is My blood;&amp;quot; and gave it to them alone... (Chapt. LXVl - of the Eucharist)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
And we afterwards continually remind each other of these things. And the wealthy among us help the needy; and we always keep together; and for all things wherewith we are supplied, we bless the Maker of all through His Son Jesus Christ, and through the Holy Ghost. And on the day called Sunday, all who live in cities or in the country gather together to one place, and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets are read, as long as time permits; then, when the reader has ceased, the president verbally instructs, and exhorts to the imitation of these good things. Then we all rise together and pray, and, as we before said, when our prayer is ended, bread and wine and water are brought, and the president in like manner offers prayers and thanksgivings, according to his ability, and the people assent, saying Amen; and there is a distribution to each, and a participation of that over which thanks have been given, and to those who are absent a portion is sent by the deacons. And they who are well to do, and willing, give what each thinks fit; and what is collected is deposited with the president, who succours the orphans and widows and those who, through sickness or any other cause, are in want, and those who are in bonds and the strangers sojourning among us, and in a word takes care of all who are in need. But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God, having wrought a change in the darkness and matter, made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead...(Chapt.LXVll - weekly worship of the Christians)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tertullian (A.D. 160 -220), an Early ecclesiastical leader and writer, in his ''Apology'' (response to pagan charges) in describing the early church community wrote, ca. AD 197: ''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We are a body knit together by one faith, one discipline and one hope. We meet together as a congregation, uniting together to offer prayer to God. We pray for the emperors and all in authority, for the welfare of the world, for peace and for the delay of the final end. We read our holy scriptures to nourish our faith, hope, steadfastness and good habits. We hear exhortations and rebukes. We take such judging very seriously – as befits those who believe they are in the sight of God – especially seriously when anyone sins so grievously we have to cut them off from our prayer, our congregation and all sacred things. Our elders preside over us, obtaining that honor not by money, but by their established character. There is no buying and selling in the things of God. Though we have a fund, but not because people can buy religion. Once a month, anyone who wants to makes a small donation – but only he who is able and willing; there is no compulsion. It is not spent on feasts, but to support and bury poor people, to provide for orphans, the elderly old persons, victims of shipwreck and those in prison for their faith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Defense by Tertullian (39), Trans. Rev. S. Thelwall. Modernized, abridged and introduced by Stephen Tomkins. Edited and prepared for the web by Dan Graves.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Pliny the Younger, the Roman governor of Pontus &amp;amp; Bithynia  (northern Turkey) from A.D. 111–113, reporting to emperor Trajan of Christians, whom such pagan rulers found intolerable:''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:... Those who denied that they were or had been Christians, when they invoked the gods in words dictated by me, offered prayer with incense and wine to your image, which I had ordered to be brought for this purpose together with statues of the gods, and moreover cursed Christ--none of which those who are really Christians, it is said, can be forced to do--these I thought should be discharged. Others named by the informer declared that they were Christians, but then denied it, asserting that they had been but had ceased to be, some three years before, others many years, some as much as twenty-five years. They all worshipped your image and the statues of the gods, and cursed Christ. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:They asserted, however, that the sum and substance of their fault or error had been that they were accustomed to meet on a fixed day before dawn and sing responsively a hymn to Christ as to a god, and to bind themselves by oath, not to some crime, but not to commit fraud, theft, or adultery, not falsify their trust, nor to refuse to return a trust when called upon to do so. When this was over, it was their custom to depart and to assemble again to partake of food &amp;amp;mdash; but ordinary and innocent food.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pliny the Younger Letters, 10.96&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Implications of the growth of worldwide Christianity ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Global Christianity]] and [[Internet evangelism]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given the increase in the public's access to global communications, it is thought that the more [[theology|theologically]] [[conservative]] non-Western Christian churches could influence Western Christianity to move in a more theologically [[conservative]] direction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=18774&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For example, non-Western [[Anglican]]s are exerting influence within the worldwide Anglican Communion against the stance of the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Anglican Communion's North American provinces with regard to [[homosexual]] practices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.maravipost.com/malawi-politics/district/5751-bishop-mw-anglicans-totally-against-homosexuality.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/2156406/Anglican-church-schism-declared-over-homosexuality.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Positive effects of Christianity on societies  ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Stbasil.jpg|right|thumb|200px|[[Saint Basil|St. Basil]] of Caesarea founded the first hospital. Christian hospitals subsequently spread quickly throughout both the East and the West.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://biblemesh.com/blog/the-christian-origins-of-hospitals/ The Christian origin of hospitals]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Christianity and hospitals]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Christianity statistics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, Christianity has had a positive effect on societies and there are a number of statistics which demonstrate this matter (see: [[Christianity statistics]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Christianity and social stability ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: [[Christianity and social stability]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Christianity and hospitals ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: [[Christianity and hospitals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheism vs. Christianity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism vs. Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the latter half of the 1600s, there was [[French atheism#Clandestine French atheism in the 1600s and 1700s|an increase]] in the degree of ideological conflict between [[atheism]] and Christianity in the [[Western World]]. At first the conflict was of a secretive nature via the use of clandestine tracts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fivebooks.com/interview/jonathan-israel-on-the-enlightenment/ Jonathan Israel on The Enlightenment]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The material was formerly at the University of Cambridge's Investigation Atheism website. A website which closed down. The material has been transferred to [http://www.mmfase.com/18th-century.html 18th Century History], Investigating Atheism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of [[militant atheism]] in the 20th century, there was widespread persecution against Christians in [[Communist]] countries such as the former [[Soviet Union]] and various Communist countries such as China continue to persecute Christians (see: [[Communism and religious persecution]]).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 21st century is projected to be a century of [[desecularization]] and atheists are expected to lose influence in the West (and the world as a whole) as a result of religious immigration and the religious conservatives having a much higher fertility rate (see also: [[Growth of global desecularization]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011, the ''American Spectator'' declared about the global population:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The report estimates about 80,000 new Christians every day, 79,000 new [[Islam|Muslims]] every day, and 300 fewer atheists every day. These atheists are presumably disproportionately represented in the [[Western World|West]], while religion is thriving in the Global South, where [[Charismatic movement|charismatic Christianity]] is exploding.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://spectator.org/archives/2011/02/28/thriving-christianity Thriving Christianity]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resources related to becoming a Christian ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Essay: Resources on becoming a Christian|Resources on becoming a Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Below are some resources on becoming a [[Christian]]:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://creation.com/good-news Are you a good person?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.newchristian.org.uk/ New Christian - UK]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.thewordfortoday.org/?page=C2000 Free audio Bible and Bible audio streaming]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.allaboutgod.com/ AllAboutGod.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics|Evidence for Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian video testimonies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/repentance.html Repentance]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://reasonsforhopejesus.com/what-if-you-die-today/ What Must You Do To Be SAVED?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Tips on choosing a Christian church:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.allaboutreligion.org/choosing-a-christian-church-faq.htm Choosing a Christian Church]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Spiritual growth as a Christian:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.navpress.com/product/9781576839324/The-Pursuit-of-Holiness-Jerry-Bridges The Pursuit of Holiness] by Jerry Bridges&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.navpress.com/product/9780891099413/The-Practice-of-Godliness-Jerry-Bridges The Practice of Godliness] by Jerry Bridges&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/529785.The_Complete_Book_of_Discipleship The Complete Book of Discipleship: On Being and Making Followers of Christ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Denominations or branches of Christianity'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roman Catholic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pentarchy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eastern Orthodoxy|Eastern Churches  -- Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Church of the East]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Protestantism|Protestant]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Anglican]] ([[Church of England]])&lt;br /&gt;
***[[Episcopal Church]] (USA affiliate) &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Congregationalist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Disciples of Christ]] and [[Churches of Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Evangelical Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Religious Society of Friends|Friends (Quaker)]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Fundamentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Lutheran]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Mennonite]]&lt;br /&gt;
***[[Amish]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Messianic Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Methodist]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Pentecostal]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Plymouth Brethren]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Presbyterian]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Reformed]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Disputed'''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jehovah's Witnesses]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Latter-day Saints]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Unitarian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Seventh-day Adventist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal Catholic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Christianity in the World'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Global Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of countries by number of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''American Christianity:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Other articles'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Future of Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and social stability]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adiabene]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The earliest Christian Church, a prison in Armageddon]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cathedral]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catholicism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Apostolic Tradition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics]] (Defense of Christianity)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christians and the Law of Moses: an essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and women's rights]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eucharist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evangelical Apostolic Church of North America (Syro-Chaldean)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ex opere operato and ex opere operantis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics|Evidence for Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel reading in the Church: the Turgama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Infant baptism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesus Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Messiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jewish Biblical way of interpretation: a solution for New Testament understanding]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Early Aramaic Jewish Christian prophesying]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Century Aramaic Jewish Christian Gospel and poetry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Judaism, Jewish Aramaic Christianity, and John 1:1]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[God on earth, the original!: an essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Passover Seder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Persecution of Christians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Revelation, Book of (historical exegesis)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Red-letter Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sign of the Cross]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Sign of the Cross: of Jewish Origin]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Way of Salvation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gates of Hell]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti Abortion activism: a personal essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Transmigration of Words in Religion: an essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Singing the Hebrew Scriptures]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christmas in the Holy Land: an essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: How to &amp;quot;get&amp;quot; a church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: How to choose a Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Water baptism cannot save, the Church cannot save, Born again by faith alone]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bible translations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The superiority of the King James Bible: Looking through!]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Christianity Needs Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Christian First, Conservative Second]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:How Many Christians In The World]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:How Conservatism Is Essential to the Future of Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Important Christian Cities]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Virtue: Christian vs secular]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Counter-cultural Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Why Christianity is incompatible with Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Encyclopedias===&lt;br /&gt;
*  Bodensieck, Julius, ed. ''The Encyclopedia of the Lutheran Church,'' (3 vol 1965), ECLS perspective &lt;br /&gt;
* Brauer, Jerald C. ''The Westminster Dictionary of Church History'' (1971), 880pp&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://newadvent.org/cathen/index.html ''The Catholic Encyyclopedia'' (1907-1913)], old but highly detailed and online&lt;br /&gt;
** '' New Catholic Encyclopedia'', edited by the Catholic University of America, 17 vol. 1967–1979.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cross, F. L., and E. A. Livingstone, eds. ''The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church''  (3rd ed. 1997), 1840pp; [https://www.amazon.com/Oxford-Dictionary-Christian-Church/dp/0192802909/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Elwell, Walter A., ed. ''Evangelical Dictionary of Theology‎'' (2001) 1312 pages; articles by over 200 Evangelical or Fundamentalist scholars &lt;br /&gt;
*Hastings, Adrian et al. eds. ''The Oxford Companion to Christian Thought'' (2000) 808pp; 600 articles by 260 Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox scholars; [https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0198600240/ref=sib_dp_pt/105-4292297-2766841#reader-link excerpt and text search]; online at [[OUP]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge'' (1911), major sources of older scholarly articles; mainline Protestant perspective  &lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc01.toc.html Vol. 1: Aachen - Basilians]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc02.toc.html Vol. 2: Basilica - Chambers]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc03.toc.html Vol. 3: Chamier - Draendorf]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc04.toc.html Vol. 4: Draeseke - Goa]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc05.toc.html Vol. 5: Goar - Innocent]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc06.toc.html Vol. 6: Innocents - Liudger]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc07.toc.html Vol. 7: Liutprand - Moralities]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc08.toc.html Vol. 8: Morality - Petersen]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc09.toc.html Vol. 9: Petri - Reuchlin]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc10.toc.html Vol. 10: Reutsch - Son]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc11.toc.html Vol. 11: Son of Man - Tremellius]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc12.toc.html Vol. 12: Trench - Zwingli]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc13.toc.html Vol. 13: Index]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Histories===&lt;br /&gt;
*Briggs, J. H. Y., Robert D. Linder, and David F. Wright. ''Introduction to the History of Christianity: First Century to the Present Day'' (2006) [https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-History-Christianity-Century-Present/dp/0800638123/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
*Gonzalez, Justo L. '' A History of Christian Thought: Volume 1: From the Beginnings to the Council of Chalcedon'' (2nd ed. 1987); [https://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Beginnings-Chalcedon/dp/0687171822/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 2: From Augustine to the Eve of the Reformation'' (2nd ed. 1987) [https://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Augustine-Reformation/dp/0687171830/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823941&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 2]; ''A History of Christian Thought: Volume 3: From the Protestant Reformation to the Twentieth Century'' (1987) [https://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Thought-Protestant-Reformation/dp/0687171849/ref=sr_1_12?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-12 excerpt and text search vol 3]&lt;br /&gt;
*Horsley, Richard A. ''Christian Origins: A People's History Of Christianity, Vol. 1'' (2006), 318pp [https://www.amazon.com/Christian-Origins-Peoples-History-Christianity/dp/080063411X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200886474&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A History of Christianity'' (2 vol 1975) [https://www.amazon.com/History-Christianity-Beginnings-1500-Revised/dp/0060649526/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200823548&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1, to 1500], by leading Baptist scholar&lt;br /&gt;
*Latourette, Kenneth Scott. ''A history of the expansion of Christianity'' (7 vol 1939-1970), monumental history of missionary work worldwide&lt;br /&gt;
*MacCulloch, Diarmaid. ''The Reformation'' (2005), influential recent survey [https://www.amazon.com/Reformation-Diarmaid-MacCulloch/dp/014303538X/ref=pd_bbs_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*McGonigle, Thomas D.,  and James F. Quigley. ''A history of the Christian Tradition: From Its Jewish Orgins to the Reformation'' (1988); ''A History of the Christian Tradition, Vol. II: From the Reformation to the Present'' (1996) [https://www.amazon.com/History-Christian-Tradition-Vol-Reformation/dp/0809136481/ref=sr_1_15?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1200808706&amp;amp;sr=8-15 excerpt and text search vol 2]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pelikan, Jaroslav. ''Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine'' (5 vol 1975-91) [https://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Doctrine-Medieval/dp/0226653757/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search v. 3, 600 AD -1300]; [https://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-Development-Reformation-1300-1700/dp/0226653773/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-4 excerpt and text search vol 4, 1300-1700]; [https://www.amazon.com/Christian-Tradition-History-Development-Doctrine/dp/0226653803/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1201083460&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 5, 1700-present] This is the standard history of Christian doctrine. &lt;br /&gt;
*Ward, Keith. ''Christianity: A Beginner's Guide'' (2008), 195pp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States===&lt;br /&gt;
* Ahlstrom,  Sydney E. ''A religious history of the American people‎'' (1979) 1192 pages; classic history from broad perspective [https://books.google.com/books?id=5kFF6a1viGcC&amp;amp;dq=inauthor:ahlstrom&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Balmer, Randall. ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism'' (2nd ed.  2004), 655pp [http://www.questia.com/library/book/encyclopedia-of-evangelicalism-by-randall-balmer.jsp ''Encyclopedia of Evangelicalism''  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lippy,  Charles H. and Peter W. Williams, eds. ''Encyclopedia of the American religious experience: studies of traditions and movements'' (3 vol 1988) 1872 pages; standard reference work; long essays by scholars &lt;br /&gt;
* Noll, Mark A. '' A history of Christianity in the United States and Canada‎'' (1992), by leading Evangelical historian [https://books.google.com/books?id=VGF3wbzzy9QC&amp;amp;dq=intitle:christianity+inauthor:noll&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Queen, Edward L. et al., eds. Encyclopedia of American Religious History'' (3rd ed. 2 vol. 2009) 1200pp&lt;br /&gt;
* Reid, Daniel G. et al. eds., ''Dictionary of Christianity in America'' (199)&lt;br /&gt;
*  Wooley,  Davis C. ed. '' Encyclopedia of Southern Baptists‎'' (5 vol 1958–19820; 2565 pages)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/christians/ What Liberals Say - Category: Christians], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.churchbud.com Christian] Social Network&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bertschlossberg.blogspot.com/2012/11/jesus-through-fabric-of-our-lives.html Jesus through the Fabric of our Lives]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bertschlossberg.blogspot.com/ Real Life and Death: the interplay of Bible, Israel, America]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bertschlossberg.blogspot.de/2013/05/who-can-be-saved-who-can-not-be-saved.html Who can be saved? Who can not be saved?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=1654926</id>
		<title>Socialism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=1654926"/>
		<updated>2020-06-05T02:39:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: Scandinavia is social democratic, as in capitalist with a welfare system. They have better freedoms than the US based on freedomhouse.org&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Antifa Dayton attacker.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Dressed in all black with his face covered, Antifa terrorist Connor Betts during the [[Dayton nightclub attack]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cernovich.com/connor-betts-the-dayton-ohio-terrorist-was-a-far-left-wing-activist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Betts stated &amp;quot;I want socialism, and I’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round understanding.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Socialism''' refers to a set of related socio-economic systems based on control by a bureaucratic elite of the means of production (as opposed to individuals personally owning property). It is a failed system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Scaliger, Charles (September 6, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33172-socialist-realities Socialist Realities]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Williamsen, Kurt; Byas, Steve (September 6, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33171-saving-america-with-socialism Saving America With Socialism?] ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Behreandt, Dennis (September 4, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33170-the-failure-of-the-command-economy The Failure of the Command Economy]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Behreandt, Dennis (September 3, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33168-going-with-fair-healthcare Going With “Fair” Healthcare]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ideology based on [[hate]], [[envy]], and [[mass murder]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Behreandt, Dennis (September 9, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33174-the-deadly-history-of-socialism The Deadly History of Socialism]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 9, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and which promotes [[totalitarianism]] at the expense of [[individual freedom]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scaliger, Charles (September 2, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33169-socialism-explained Socialism Explained]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 2, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Jasper, William F. (December 17, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/34153-socialists-stop-spread-of-success Socialists Stop Spread of Success]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 17, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The movement is responsible for the murder of at least 94 million people over the past 100 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Werth, Nicolas; Panné, Jean-Louis; Paczkowski, Andrzej; Bartosek, Karel; Margolin, Jean-Louis (October 1999), Courtois, Stéphane, ed., ''[https://archive.org/stream/TheBlackBookofCommunism10/the-black-book-of-communism-jean-louis-margolin-1999-communism_djvu.txt  The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression]'', Harvard University Press, p. 4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fundamental flaw of socialism is the belief that one person has the right to the fruit of another person's [[labor]] and [[private property]], for example, that healthcare paid by others is a &amp;quot;human right.&amp;quot; Socialism has been tried and failed in countries such as the [[United Kingdom]], [[India]], and [[Israel]] during the 20th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Edwards, Lee (October 16, 2019). [https://www.heritage.org/progressivism/commentary/three-nations-tried-socialism-and-rejected-it Three Nations That Tried Socialism and Rejected It]. ''The Heritage Foundation''. Retrieved October 23, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political theory, socialism relies on scapegoating to build a constituent base. For example, that &amp;quot;the rich,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Jews,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;millionaires and billionaires,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the top 1%&amp;quot; are responsible for all of humanity's ills. Socialism targets the youth of a nation and people without life experience using naive, simplistic,  and &amp;quot;feel good&amp;quot; slogans (&amp;quot;[[Medicare for All]],&amp;quot; &amp;quot;tuition-free education,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;free housing.&amp;quot; etc., for example) that on the surface appeal to self-interest, while asking nothing of the hearers to contribute to the economic well being of their fellow citizens or society. Once in power, Socialists compel compliance with [[authoritarian]] decrees (the &amp;quot;individual mandate&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;shared responsibility payment,&amp;quot; for example) suppress criticism, censor [[free speech]], silence or exterminate opposition in order to maintain power for themselves. There is nothing [[democracy|democratic]] about socialism, and terms such as [[democratic socialism]] or [[social democracy]] are [[oxymoron]]s that are typical of Marxist &amp;quot;double speak&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;double think.&amp;quot; Socialist leaders often live in extreme luxury even as they fail to improve the lives of those they rule over,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Maxim (March 11, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lifestyles-of-the-rich-and-socialist-from-chavez-to-castro-leaders-who-lived-the-high-life Lifestyles of the Rich and Socialist: From Chavez to Castro, leaders who lived the high life]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved March 11, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Snowball, Timothy (May 15, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/443228-socialism-is-neither-a-fair-nor-progressive-political-philosophy Socialism is neither a fair nor 'progressive' political philosophy]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved May 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Jasper, William F. (September 11, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33175-socialism-for-your-benefit-or-theirs Socialism: For Your Benefit — or Theirs?] ''The New American''. Retrieved September 11, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and its destructive effects on society often are irreversible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (May 10, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/10/blue-state-blues-venezuela-south-africa-show-socialism-difficult-to-undo/ Blue State Blues: Venezuela, South Africa Show Socialism Difficult to Undo]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 10, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Demaggio, John M. (July 20, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/453913-has-socialism-already-failed-in-the-united-states Has socialism already failed in the United States?] ''The Hill''. Retrieved July 20, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Socialism is fully compatible with &amp;quot;big business,&amp;quot; or [[crony capitalism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Philipp, Joshua (August 7, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-corrupt-romance-between-big-business-and-socialism_2977800.html The Corrupt Romance Between Big Business and Socialism]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved August 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a social theory, the modern [[Democratic party]] uses [[identity politics]] to create a new &amp;quot;oppressed class&amp;quot; of victims which replaces the traditional worker/peasant/proletariat victims of the imaginary &amp;quot;oppressor class&amp;quot; - &amp;quot;the [[bourgeois]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/PkNzYttjSHE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Socialism preys on people who fall victim to the [[sin]]s of [[envy]] and [[covet]]ousness, and raises [[Iconoclasm]] and [[nihilism]] as exalted [[virtue]]s.  Left-wing professors and universities have played a large role in advancing socialist ideology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Maxim (January 18, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/socialism-rising-universities-and-radical-profs-helping-steer-leftward-shift-in-politics Socialism rising: Universities and ‘radical’ profs helping steer leftward shift in politics, critics say]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many individual socialists and groups display juvenile, adolescent, and cult-like behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, socialism is an [[authoritarian]] system which advocates strict [[economic planning|command and control]] of [[income]]s and distribution or rationing of goods and services, including food and healthcare. High taxation to expropriate wealth from the supposed &amp;quot;oppressor class&amp;quot; is common to all socialist regimes. Removal of incentives and demonizing the [[profit]] motive, while expecting common people to produce goods and services, and supply tax revenues to government, for little or no pay is a [[psychotic]] dream.  After exterminating &amp;quot;corporations&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the rich,&amp;quot; the cost burden of government - which controls everything - naturally falls to an impoverished working class, the unemployed, and homeless which previously paid no taxes. And no one can retain anything for themselves because the profit motive is disincentivized or outlawed. Due to its core [[anti-democratic]] and authoritarian precepts, socialism is considered [[treason]]ous to [[America]]'s central ideal of [[liberty]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism at all times has never amounted to more than a [[criminal]] gang that enlists the aid of academics and disgruntled, naive youth and the misfits of society. One of the most well known socialist regimes of the 20th century was the [[Nazi Party|National Socialist German Workers' Party]] (Nazi Party), headed by [[Adolf Hitler]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/adolf_hitler.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Through [[affirmative action]] programs, Nazism granted workers and peasants access to educational and employment opportunities previously only available to the German bourgeois and [[nobility]] (the &amp;quot;oppressor class&amp;quot;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both [[Communism]] and [[Nazism]] are [[totalitarian]] or [[statist]], subverting the rights of individuals to the [[collective]] of a [[single party]]. Nazism deviates from orthodox Marxist theory in substituting racial and ethnic conflict for economic [[class warfare]]. Nazism substituted &amp;quot;[[Jews]]&amp;quot; as the oppressor class, responsible for all societal woes, rather than &amp;quot;the rich,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;[[Republican]]s,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;white males&amp;quot; as modern leftists do. The [[Second World War]] was a life and death struggle between two [[leftwing]] interpretations of socialism - both atheistic and subverting the rights of  individuals to the state, one considering &amp;quot;equality&amp;quot; to apply only to members of a nation or race, the other [[multicultural]] and [[globalist]]. After the [[United States]] assisted the [[communist]] victory over [[National Socialism]] (see [[Popular Front liberalism]]), the [[Cold War]] was an effort to suppress the spread of global communism. Socialists consider all forms of [[capitalism]] as &amp;quot;[[fascist]]&amp;quot; (see [[Antifa]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Roots==&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism has its roots in visions of imaginary ideal societies, from thinkers who drew up elaborated designs and concepts for creating what they considered a more equal society, along collectivist lines or abolished [[private property]]; the primary ideas came from British and French thinkers like [[Henri de Saint-Simon|Saint-Simon]], [[Charles Fourier]], Louis Blanc, and [[Robert Owen]] preceded by [[Thomas More]], Tommaso Campanella, and Jean Meslier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historic types==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Backrdv12n2.jpg|right|400px|thumb|The Russian caption reads, &amp;quot;Long live the great unbeatable flag of [[Karl Marx|Marx]], [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]], [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]], [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]]!&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
There are three main kinds of Socialism, all of them are built on the premise of government control of the means of production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Leninism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist Socialism, or '''Leninism''', as revised by [[Vladimir Lenin]] and practiced in the pre-[[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] Soviet Union, was the Socialistic theory developed by Vladimir Lenin during his rise to power. Lenin defined socialism as a transitional stage between capitalism and communism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In striving for socialism, however, we are convinced that it will develop into communism&amp;quot;, Lenin, State and Revolution, Selected Works, Progress publishers, Moscow, 1968, p. 320. (End of chapter four)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Leninism is totalitarian, with no [[democracy]] and all decisions are made by the leaders of the Communist party. Lenin saw the Communist Party as an &amp;quot;elite&amp;quot; that was committed to ending capitalism and instituting socialism in its place and attaining the power by any means possible, including revolution. Lenin was quite mild on the belief, believing that, though controlling of resources was important, the people's will comes first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though [[Bolshevik]] Russia was somewhat more prosperous than its former [[Russian Empire|Tsardom]], Lenin's death in 1924 sparked the overthrow of his Marxist–Leninism and the imposition of [[Stalinism]], the violent, totalitarian belief that went against some of Lenin's ideas (many of Lenin's works were censored by Stalin post-1924).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Democratic&amp;quot; Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ellison-antifa.jpg|right|175px|thumb|[[Democratic National Committee]] Vice-Chair [[Keith Ellison]] promoted Anitfa.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The second form of Socialism (sometimes called &amp;quot;Revisionism&amp;quot;) prevailed in Europe down to the 1970s, and is typified by the [[Fabian Socialism|Fabian Society]] and the British Labour Party. It was inspired by Socialism and closely linked to labor unions that had real power. The goal was for [[Industrial Democracy]], that is, for the government to own (&amp;quot;nationalize&amp;quot;) major industries such as coal mining, railways, steel making, shipbuilding, airlines, and banking. Small businesses remained private. The idea was that labor unions controlled the government and therefore unions controlled working conditions and wages for the benefit of workers, regardless of the damage to long-term economic growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Socialists were well organized and after 1918 they bitterly fought the breakaway faction that became the [[Communist]] movement. In recent years major Socialist parties (in Europe and Canada) have sometimes dropped the long-standing demands for state ownership of the means of production and have mostly accepted &amp;quot;Controlled Capitalism&amp;quot;. However, they remain tied to labor unions and favor liberal policies regarding high taxes and public spending. Conservatives have been negative toward the economics of the second form of socialism. Conservatives complain socialists use government power to redistribute wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within the [[European Union]], a form of [[democratic socialism]] was initially viewed as successful but eventually lead to lowered social equity and a downward spiraling economy, as well as general discontent. Although this acts as a drag on the economy, in democratic countries of the industrialized west, some socialist ideas have been put into practice with varying degrees of success. Beginning in 2010 many European countries were racked with rioting and social unrest as governments began to back away from out-of-control entitlements that began bankrupting them and lead to a world financial crisis because of unrestrained debt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791804575439732358241708.html WSJ; &amp;quot;Obstacle to Deficit Cutting: A Nation on Entitlements&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100929/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_europe_austerity_protests_10 Anti-austerity protests sweep across Europe]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.allbusiness.com/economy-economic-indicators/economic-policy-bailouts/14758032-1.html &amp;quot;Debt crisis pushes Europe toward economic reforms&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early 21st century, Socialism was becoming increasingly prominent in the West.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ozimek, Tom (November 9, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/socialism-stirs-again-30-years-after-collapse-of-berlin-wall_3141025.html Socialism Stirs Again 30 Years After Collapse of Berlin Wall]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved November 9, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Communal Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
The third form of Socialism has nothing to do with Marx or government ownership, and emphasizes the importance of the community over the individual.  Usually it means small communities sharing most of their possessions. The most famous examples are the religious [[Shakers]] of the 19th century (a conservative group), and the new-left communes that briefly existed in the 1960s and 70s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Early American settlers, as in Plymouth or Virginia, tried it but quickly abandoned it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Pilgrims in Plymouth used communal farming their first winter but then after a dismal harvest that first year, moved to a system where there was a more direct incentive other than guilt and honor. Governor Bradford summed it up in his journal:&lt;br /&gt;
:* &amp;quot;And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number, for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance) and ranged all boys and youth under some family. This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Not only were all hands more industrious—the incentive to harvest communal corn before it was fully ripe, a problem equivalent to poaching in the case of wildlife, was also eliminated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Robertsincentives.html Incentives Matter] - Russell Roberts - Library of Economics and Liberty&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Influence of Russia on socialism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Not until the birth of the [[Soviet Union]] after the [[Communist Revolution]] did the idea become generally accepted that socialism meant government seizing ownership of the economy.  Experience in 19th and 20th century [[France]], [[England]], and [[Germany]], however, made it clear that regulatory control by government bureaucrats is sufficient to implement socialism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ What is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Communism (the primary variant of socialism) the central goal is to establish a &amp;quot;[[workers' paradise]]&amp;quot;-an ideal state with perfect equality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In practice the socialist government owns the banks, railroads, farmlands, factories, and stores, and is the only employer, or at least controls the regulation of production and distribution.  The central goal is to destroy the &amp;quot;evils of capitalism&amp;quot; by government ownership or control of the means of production, usually with one party controlling the government on behalf of the working class. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist system never manages to establish this &amp;quot;paradise&amp;quot; because management for the benefit of the employees leads to featherbedding and lack of investment or economic growth, at the expense of consumers.  Collective farming (operating farms like factories) sharply reduced the food supply. The most thoroughgoing efforts by Communist regimes turned into authoritarian dictatorships. The government controls all investments, production, distribution, income, and prices, as well as all organizations, schools, news media and formerly private societies. Churches and labor unions are suppressed or controlled by the government. Socialism is the antithesis of [[capitalism]], because it opposes private ownership of capital or land, and rejects the free market in favor of central planning. It also rejects &amp;quot;civil society&amp;quot; and makes sure that all organizations are controlled by the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically, socialist regimes can have multiple parties. In practice there is only one political party, and it controls the government. The leaders of the party choose the government officials and set all policies for the nation and for cities and localities.  Opposition parties are not allowed access to the media or to meeting halls or to funding, and their leaders are often arrested as &amp;quot;enemies of the people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the redistribution of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the many over the rights of the few, but in practice when socialist economic principles are forced onto a nation by a totalitarian government a new Upper Class appears which is much better off than the Lower Class.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- Winston Churchill&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.quotesdaddy.com/quote/280995/winston-churchill/socialism-is-a-philosophy-of-failure-the-creed-of Churchill; Quotesdaddy.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism supposedly is an &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot; pursuit. Raisa Gorbachev, the wife of the last General Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], held a &amp;quot;PhD in Marxism-Leninism.&amp;quot;  Raisa Gorbachev died in a German hospital of [[leukemia]] because her beloved Soviet homeland was incapable of delivering proper healthcare, even for the elite of the Soviet Socialist Republic, after 70 years of socialism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===National Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|250px|right|One of the most well known political parties of the 20th century  was the [[National Socialist]] party of Germany headed by the [[evolution|evolutionary racist]] [[Adolf Hitler]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mises&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://mises.org/daily/1937&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;darNaz&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hott&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.hourofthetime.com/socialist.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ludwig von Mises Institute]] declares:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|The identification of [[Nazi]] [[Germany]] as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of [[Ludwig von Mises]]...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.}} Hitler found the notion of single-party control very attractive. That, and the idea of creating a &amp;quot;New man&amp;quot; in a godless socialist order, enlightened by science, victorious over their oppressors. Nazism was outlawed at the end of [[World War II]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Commonalities of Communism, Nazism and liberalism===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism|Fascism and the New Deal}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
!Communist Manifesto&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nazi]] Party Platform&lt;br /&gt;
!Analysis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The stripping away of land from private owners.  [[Liberalism]] today demands &amp;quot;eminent domain&amp;quot; on property.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand the nationalization of all trusts...profit-sharing in large industries...a generous increase in old-age pensions...by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor...and the creation of a national (folk) army.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The points raised in the [[Nazi]] platform demand an increase in taxes to support them.  Liberalism today demands heavy progressive and graduated income taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Abolition of all rights of inheritance.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|Liberalism today demands a &amp;quot;death tax&amp;quot; on anyone inheriting an estate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Nuremberg Laws of 1934 allowed Germany to take Jewish property.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand the nationalization of all trusts.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of the financial system.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press...editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens...Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State...the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of the press.  Liberals today demand control or suppression of talk radio and Fox News.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &amp;amp;c, &amp;amp;c.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of education, with an emphasis on doing things their way.  Liberals today are doing things ''their way'' in our schools.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Britain, the Labour Party and Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
At its inception, the [[Labour Party]] borrowed socialist ideas by committing itself to a program of nationalization under 'Clause 4' of their Constitution, but was always fundamentally committed to the British system of parliamentary government. Clause 4 was formally dropped after the election of [[Tony Blair]] as Party leader, signaling the creation of 'New' Labour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/21/newsid_2515000/2515825.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The British governments of 1945-1950 and 1950-1951 under [[Clement Attlee]] implemented the nationalization of several industries and utilities, including coal, steel, water, railways and electricity. Former owners of nationalized industries were compensated.  The best-known example is the nationalization of health care to create the [[National Health Service]] (NHS).  This made - literally overnight - health care &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; at the point of delivery for everybody in Britain, and it remains so today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1980s under Conservative Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] most of the nationalized industries were returned to the private sector, and public housing has been sold to the residents. These conservative decisions were endorsed by the &amp;quot;New Labour&amp;quot; of Tony Blair, to the annoyance of elderly radicals who fondly remember the poverty and inefficiencies of the old system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Obamunism ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Obamunism}}&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2010, [[American]] political consultant [[Dick Morris]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|When [[Obama]] took office, federal, state and local spending accounted for 30 percent of [[gross domestic product]]. Now it is up to 35 percent, and when health care is fully implemented, it will rise to above 40 percent. But taxes are still below 30 percent. The difference is the deficit, now grown to 10 percent of our GDP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If our government is to continue spending 40 percent of our GDP, we will morph into the European model of a socialist democracy. But if we can roll the spending back to 30 percent, while holding taxes level, we will retain our free market system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/columnists/DickMorrisandEileenMcGann/2010/04/24/the_silent_killer_obamas_vat_proposal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shepard-Fairey-imgs.JPG|right|thumb|250px|[[Shepard Fairey]], designer of the official Obama hope and change logo, is more known for his anti-American and pro-communist themes. Here a  [[Mao Zedong|Maoist]]  revolutionary is depicted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://images.google.com/images?um=1&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-ContextMenu&amp;amp;rlz=1I7ACAW_en___US352&amp;amp;tbs=isch:1&amp;amp;q=Shepard+Fairey&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;start=40&amp;amp;ndsp=20&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Anita Dunn]], the political strategist and former White House Communications Director, admitted that one of favorite political philosophers, one that she “turns to the most”, is [[Mao Zedong]], the [[communism|communist]] dictator responsible for the starvation, torture, and killing of 70 million Chinese.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/blog/2009/10/16/anita-dunn-favorite-philosopher-mao-tse-tung/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of the Obama administration have coined the word &amp;quot;[[Obamunism]]&amp;quot; to describe Barack Obama's socialistic and &amp;quot;[[fascism]] light&amp;quot; [[economic planning]] policies ([[Benito Mussolini]] defined fascism as the wedding of state and corporate powers.  Accordingly, trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] labels [[Obama administration corporate bailouts|Obama's corporate bailouts]] as being &amp;quot;fascism light&amp;quot; in nature).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/daily-intel/2009/07/20/obamunism-inc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.smallbusinessadvocate.com/small-business-interviews/gerald-celente-6944&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obamunism can also [[Allusion|allude]] to Obama's [[Obama administration fiscal policy|ruinous fiscal policies]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|reckless monetary policies]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://seekingalpha.com/article/120883-monetary-policynot-obama-s-stimulusis-what-needs-watching&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nypost.com/seven/05172009/postopinion/editorials/bams_wise_words_169731.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Stimulus====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Larry Summers]] was the Director of the White House's National Economic Council (NEC) for President Barack Obama. George Gerald Reisman, Professor Emeritus of Economics at [[Pepperdine University]] and author of ''Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics'', wrote that Summers' socialistic ideas on redistributing wealth demonstrate that [[Larry Summers]] is a &amp;quot;lightweight leftist&amp;quot; who &amp;quot;fails to understand the nature of the most essential feature of capitalism, namely, private ownership of the means of production and the indispensable role it plays in the standard of living of the average person.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;misesblog&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://blog.mises.org/archives/009031.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Reisman also wrote that Summers is a shallow and ignorant man whose knowledge of economics is minimal and whose evil views qualify him to be the economic advisor to [[Hugo Chavez]] of [[Venezuela]] or [[Robert Mugabe]] of [[Zimbabwe]], but do not qualify him to be an economic advisor to the President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;misesblog&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Land grab====&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2010, [[Hot Air]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The federal government, as the memo boasted, is the nation’s “largest land manager.” It already owns roughly [http://bigthink.com/ideas/21343 one of every three acres] in the United States. This is apparently not enough. At a “listening session” in New Hampshire last week, government bureaucrats trained their sights on millions of [http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9HGKEAG0.htm private forest land]  throughout the [[New England]] region. Agriculture Secretary [[Tom Vilsack]] crusaded for “the need for additional attention to the Land and Water Conservation Fund — and the need to promptly support full funding of that fund.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Property owners have every reason to be worried. The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is a pet project of green radicals, who want the decades-old government slush fund for buying up private lands to be freed from congressional appropriations oversight. It’s paid for primarily with receipts from the government’s offshore oil and gas leases. Both Senate and House Democrats have included $900 million in full LWCF funding, not subject to congressional approval, in their energy/BP oil spill legislative packages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/archives/2010/08/14/great-outdoors-initiative-a-federal-land-grab/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====You didn't build that====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{main|You didn't build that}}&lt;br /&gt;
On July 13, 2012, at a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Obama gave a speech that immediately stirred up controversy. Speaking about the government's role in the success of private business, he said:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/13/remarks-president-campaign-event-roanoke-virginia Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event in Roanoke, Virginia], White House&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help.  There was a great teacher somewhere in your life.  Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.  Somebody invested in roads and bridges.  If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that.  Somebody else made that happen.}} The [[Romney]] campaign has used &amp;quot;If you’ve got a business—you didn’t build that&amp;quot; in ads to show America that Obama believes it is government that creates business rather than hard-working individuals. The Obama campaign has alternatively stated that the sentenced was poorly worded since he was not giving a scripted speech and that when Obama said &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; he was referring to roads and bridges. Obama points to a later portion of his speech in which he said, &amp;quot;The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together,&amp;quot; to support his claim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Obamacare ''diktats''====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ObamaCareSymbol.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Image courtesy [[Newsbusters]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obamacare}}&lt;br /&gt;
The centerpiece of Obamacare was the [[individual mandate]] or ''[[diktat]]'', a provision that makes it mandatory for every citizen to purchase private health insurance, which was unprecedented in American history. There was no [[bi-partisan]] or national consensus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Epic [[Direct spending#New spending|new spending]] and taxes, pricier insurance, rationed care, dishonest accounting: The Pelosi health bill has it all. [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703399204574505423751140690.html Nancy Pelosi's New Health-Care Bill], ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'', November 01, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[President Obama]], Senate Majority Leader [[Harry Reid]] and House Speaker [[Nancy Pelosi]] rammed Obamacare down the throats of an unwilling American public. Half a year removed from the unprecedented legislative chicanery and backroom dealing that characterized the bill's passage, much more is known about the bill than when it was passed into law. [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Obamacare-is-even-worse-than-critics-thought-960772-103571664.html Examiner Editorial: Obamacare is even worse than critics thought], ''Washington Examiner'', September 22, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than 150 million Americans were completely locked out of the process.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Crabtree, S. (2009, October 20). &amp;quot;[https://thehill.com/homenews/house/63941-democrats-lock-republicans-out-of-committee-room Democrats Lock Republicans Out of Committee Room].&amp;quot; ''The Hill''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Pershing, B. (2009, October 23). &amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/22/AR2009102204442.html Democrats on House Committee Lock Out Republicans].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Freeman, J. (2009, October 20). &amp;quot;House Democrats Lock GOP Out of Committee Room.&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(2009, October 21). &amp;quot;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/21/oversight-panels-democrats-lock-republicans-dispute/ Oversight Panel's Democrats Lock Out Republicans After Dispute].&amp;quot; ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's progressive Democratic Socialists had single party control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davis, S. (2009, April 28). &amp;quot;[https://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/04/28/sen-specter-to-switch-parties-democrats-near-60-vote-majority/ Sen. Specter To Switch Parties, Democrats Near 60 Vote Majority].&amp;quot; Washington Wire. ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;keithmsnbcer (2009, April 29). &amp;quot;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGYBbFMeFNc Bernie Sanders on Ed Show].&amp;quot; ''MSNBC''. YouTube.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Censorship of journalists====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obamagate timeline 2009-2014 vanguardism}}&lt;br /&gt;
On May 13, 2013 the [[Associated Press]] announced telephone records for 20 of their reporters had been [[subpoena]]ed by the Justice Department. The Justice Dept. subpoenaed the phone records of AP from [[Verizon]] and other service providers.&amp;lt;ref name=verizonslate&amp;gt;{{cite web|last=Gallagher|first=Ryan|title=Verizon Wireless Secretly Passed AP Reporters' Phone Records to Feds|publisher=www.slate.com|date=May 16, 2013|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/05/16/verizon_wireless_passed_ap_reporters_phone_records_to_the_feds.html|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The AP claimed these acts were a &amp;quot;massive and unprecedented intrusion&amp;quot; into news-gathering.&amp;lt;ref name=TTSanchez&amp;gt;{{cite web|last=Sanchez|first=Raf|title=US Justice Department secretly seizes Associated Press phone records|publisher=The Telegraph|date=May 13, 2013|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/10055318/US-Justice-Department-secretly-seizes-Associated-Press-phone-records.html|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=TG130513&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Washington (AP)|title=US government secretly obtained Associated Press phone records|publisher=The Guardian|date=May 13, 2013|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/13/america-government-associated-press-phone-records|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; CEO Gary Pruitt of AP stated: &amp;quot;These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP's newsgathering operations and disclose information about AP's activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=CNNJohns&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Matt Smith and Joe Johns|title=AP blasts feds for phone records search|publisher=CNN|date=May 14, 2013|url=https://www.cnn.com/2013/05/13/us/justice-ap-phones/?hpt=hp_t2|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=holder&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Gary B. Pruitt|title=AP letter to Eric Holder on seizure of phone records|publisher=USA Today|date=May 13, 2013|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/05/13/doj-seizes-ap-phone-records/2156819/|accessdate=June 1, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few years earlier, Attn. Gen. [[Eric Holder]] renewed a subpoena of James Risen, a reporter for the ''[[New York Times]]''. Risen and a colleague reported on warrantless wiretaps. The coverage won Risen and colleague a [[Pulitzer Prize]] for “carefully sourced stories on secret domestic eavesdropping that stirred a national debate.” The Justice Dept. [[John Brennan]], an avowed communist, played a key role in the illegal wiretap program, overseeing the production of what personnel in the program called the “scary memos” intended to justify domestic spying exposed by Risen. Brennan later admitted that he relied on information from CIA's torture program rather than domestic spying, which was used as a cover.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2013 [[Comey]]'s [[FBI]] opened a case on [[CBS News]] anchor [[Sharyl Attkisson]] under the auspices of '[[national security]].' Attkisson reported news embarrassing to Eric Holder on [[Operation Fast and Furious]] and extensively on the [[Benghazi massacre]] coverup.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wyden.senate.gov&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.wyden.senate.gov/download/?id=285dc9e7-195a-4467-b0fe-caa857fc4e0d&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Police state surveillance of opponents====&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also : [[Obamagate timeline 2015 progressive police state]] and [[Obamagate timeline|Obamagate timeline 2016 election year]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contradictory Goals of Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism's stated purpose is to eliminate the huge gap between the highest and lowest classes of society. Their bitter complaint has been that the upper class exploits its dominance to gain privileges and wealth, while the lower class must suffer tyranny and poverty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;all socialists agree that a socialist economy must be run for the benefit of the vast majority of the people rather than for a small aristocratic, plutocratic, or capitalist class.&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_an_economic_system]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This obsession with class paradoxically creates a group of people with a vested interest in seeing class differences remain (socialist politicians, [[community organizer]]s, ''etc.''); if by some means the class system actually ''were'' destroyed, these people would be out of a job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another essential goal of most socialist thinkers has been to eliminate [[Capitalism]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;... one of the fundamental goals of the socialist movement throughout history has been the abolition of capitalism&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_opposition_and_criticisms_of_socialism_arguments_for_and_against A Wisdom Archive on Socialism - Opposition and criticisms of socialism; arguments for and against]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
on the grounds that only &amp;quot;social control&amp;quot; of the economy can prevent abuses such as [[feudalism]], [[monopoly]], [[cartel]]s, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But experiments on both a moderate and a grand scale have shown that socialism's main purpose has been undermined by its unremitting opposition to [[free market]] economics. In its drive to eliminate capitalism, it has overlooked the fact that general prosperity is vouchsafed by [[economic freedom]], and that free market economics improves the lot of the poor much more quickly and permanently than any system of central economic control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real aim of socialists is probably personal: why else would socialists want to create programs which encourage Dependency? Well, it fits into their lust for power. &lt;br /&gt;
People who want to control others need people who are willing to be controlled.&lt;br /&gt;
Independent, proactive people do not fit into the socialist Power Model. That is why the first thing [[Karl Marx|Marx]] wanted to remove from the economy was the [[Profit]] Motive: it gives people an incentive to make their own decisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key elements==&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the expropriation of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the nomenklatura over the rights of workers and earners.  Many of the most notoriously oppressive dictatorships have been socialist, such as the [[Soviet Union]] and China under Mao Zedong. Private wealth was seized and the owners executed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic theory===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Atheism|atheist]] [[Karl Marx]] is sometimes referred to as the father of socialism. Economist Thomas Sowell observed:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The Marxian contribution to economics can be readily summarized as virtually zero. Professional economics as it exists today reflects no indication that Karl Marx ever existed... [T]he development of modern economics has simply ignored Marx. Even economists who are Marxists typically utilize a set of analytical tools to which Marx contributed nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thomas Sowell, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=TVkVAAAAIAAJ Marxism: Philosophy and Economics]'' (Taylor &amp;amp; Francis, 1985) ISBN 0043201717, p. 217.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the individual is subordinate to the collective, the use of [[democide]], or &amp;quot;death by government,&amp;quot; is another feature of socialism in the final stage of bringing about a single party, anti-democratic totalitarian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Welfare state===&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, democratic socialism calls for equalization of incomes, through taxation of private wealth coupled with welfare state spending. The [[nationalization]] of major industries is primarily a device to allow the unionized workers to control their own wages and working conditions, cutting out the capitalistic owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State [[pension]]s and unemployment insurance were not brought in by Socialists—they were first introduced by arch-conservative Chancellor [[Bismarck]] in Germany in the 1870s. In Britain they were introduced about 1910 by [[Winston Churchill]] and [[David Lloyd George]] of the [[Liberal Party]], and in the U.S. were part of Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt's [[New Deal]] in the 1930s.  Welfare state ideas such as [[universal health care]], and state control of key industries have been common throughout the developed world in the modern era. However, the United States has always rejected socialism as an ideological position, with a few exceptions such as the [[TVA]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===So-called &amp;quot;mixed economies&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Social democracy|Mixed economy}}&lt;br /&gt;
Social democracies and Mixed economies are socialism by [[incrementalism]]. Often socialism is a matter of degree and numerous economies in the world are very socialistic such as [[Europe]]an countries (many of which are facing financial difficulties due to over taxation and excessive spending).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/05/european_socialism_is_bleeding.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The single party has yet to gain full control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because many businesses still are privately owned, [[ipso facto]], the [[United States]] is not a socialistic government. &amp;quot;That definition is confuted by the earliest theoretical writings on socialism.  In France, Henri de Saint-Simon, in the first decades of the 1800s, and his pupil and colleague [[Auguste Comte]], in the 1820s and 30s, along with [[Robert Owen]] contemporaneously in England, ''stated that the essential feature of what Owen called socialism is government regulation of the means of production and distribution.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ Thomas E. Brewton; Once Again: What Is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
When the government controls the volume of money and its economic applications, it has the economy in a stranglehold.  When government controls education so that nothing other than secular socialism may be taught, as Saint-Simon advocated, it controls the future destiny of a nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
Some forms of socialism have often been [[atheism|atheistic]] in character, and many leading socialists (most prominently Karl Marx) have been critical of the role of religion - and conservative religion in particular - which they criticize for lending support to an unjust social order. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Socialists have been Christians, and there has been considerable interplay between Christian and Socialist ideas. [[Christian socialists]] have asserted that early Christian communities, in particular, displayed certain traits, such as the holding of possessions in common,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:44: &amp;quot;Everyone was filled with awe, and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the rejection of conventional sexual mores and gender roles, the provision for communal education, etc., that could be considered similar to socialism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the chaos sparked by the advent of the Reformation in Europe, several sects with radical new interpretations of Christianity sprung up, many of them Anabaptists (believers in adult baptism). Under the leadership of the reformer Thomas Muntzer the peasants of south-west Germany rose up in arms against the clergy and nobility, establishing anarcho-communes in their wake. Though they were massacred to a man, ten years later a group of radical Anabaptists under the leadership of Jan Matthys seized control of the north-western Germany city of Munster from the Prince-Archbishop there and established a Christian-Communist state. True to the spirit of applied communism, Mathys took twelve wives, held lavish feasts for himself and his most loyal followers and had himself crowned King of the World as the city starved, besieged by an alliance of Protestant and Catholic forces keen to see them exterminated. Mathys and all his followers were all tortured and killed when the Prince-Archbishop returned with professional troops to sack the city and reassert his authority, effectively wiping out all non-pacifistic Anabaptists in north-western Germany. Only Baptists as we know them today survived the following persecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See, for instance,  Arnold Toynbee, the British historian, has responded to this,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Marxian excerpt from a Christian Socialism is an experiment which is doomed to failure because it has denied itself the aid of the spiritual power which alone is capable of making Socialism a success. ….'Christianity', they say, 'is the opiate of the People'; and, in the [[Soviet Union]]… Christianity or of any other theistic religion have been debarred… from admission to membership of the All-Union Communist Party. In fact, Communism has been definitely and militantly anti-Christian. Thus the campaign against Christianity which is to-day an integral part of the propaganda of [[Marxian Socialism]] is a challenge to the living generation of Christians …we latter-day Christians may still turn a Marxian attack upon Christianity to good account … a re-awakening of the Christian social conscience has been the one great positive practical achievement of Karl Marx&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'', Annex II to Vol. V, Part C (i) (c) 2, p. 585-586, Marxism, Socialism, and Christianity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Alleged New Testament socialism in a godless utopia====&lt;br /&gt;
Socialist claim the earliest Christians were decidedly living in a manner consistent with basic aims of socialism, albeit with critical requirements and distinctions from its secularist expressions. Luke 14:33 requires the forsaking of all one has if one will be a disciple of Christ, and while this is not shown to necessarily always require the literally forsaking of all,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Acts 2:44 states that the communal believers &amp;quot;had all things common&amp;quot;. Acts 4:32-5:11 also describes community redistribution of property, and details the Divine punishment of a husband and wife for hypocrisy, in keeping proceeds from the sale of a piece of property while openly pretending that they gave it all, as others  voluntarily did.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible, (5:1-11)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, forsaking all is shown to be that of first surrendering oneself and life to the God of the Bible, and placing all at His disposal,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry (1662 - 1714), ''Commentary on the Whole Bible'', Lk. 14:25-35&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Archibald Thomas Robertson, ''WORD PICTURES IN THE NEW TESTAMENT'', Lk. 14:33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with literal giving as a result being as He directs, and voluntary. (2Cor. 8,9) &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all things, may abound to every good work: (2 Corinthians 9:7-8)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the early organic community provides a noble model of communal life, and of a &amp;quot;seminary&amp;quot; type experience, it was also soon dispersed by persecution (thus greatly expanding the church: Acts 8:1-5; 11:19), and it is later indicated that believers retained ownership of property after conversion. (Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13) Rich Christians are evidenced to have been part of the early church, but were not mandated by the church itself to give all they had away, but to be lowly in mind, and to be ready and willing to distribute, in faith and surrender to God. (1Tim. 6:17-19) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, in both Testaments capitalism is clearly supported,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gary North, ''Capitalism and the Bible''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  and indolence is not subsidized, but penalized by poverty, while diligence in work is rewarded by its fruits. (Prov. 6:6-11; 13:4; 20:4; 2 Thes. 3:10-12; 1 Tim. 5:17-18) Although holy widows over 60 years old who were without familial support were taken in by the church, a man is clearly required to provide for his own family, if able. (1Tim. 5:2ff) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
While the success of the early church as an organic community is often invoked in support of modern socialism, and many communes of the 1960s evoked the Bible, the early organic church was a result of the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit among believers, while the &amp;quot;administrators&amp;quot; were humble servants who were examples of self-sacrifice, and who worked with their own hands as needed, (1Cor. 4:9-16) and whose authority was established by manifest Divine attestation, including the pro-active exercise of church discipline being only by supernatural or otherwise spiritual means, not carnal force.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:43; 5:5,9,10; 1Cor. 4:19-21; 2Cor. 13:2,3; 2Thes. 3:14,15; 2Tim. 4:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, other distinctions, without the unique changes and influence resulting from faith and full surrender to Christ from all the community, and His anointing upon the work, attempts to mimic the communal life of Christians have failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As one critic of modern-day  socialism states: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Socialism, unfortunately, completely disregards Biblical teaching about the fallen nature of human beings and assumes that human beings will act in a morally upright fashion if their basic needs are met. This is at the heart of why socialistic systems never work: because human nature does not work in this fashion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/06/capitalism-and-socialism-in-light-of-the-bible Bob Ellis, ''Capitalism and Socialism in Light of the Bible''] Dakota Voice, June 23rd, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Atheism and socialism ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton|Acton]] Institute states concerning [[atheism and socialism]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|...a growing body of research reveals that as the welfare state grows, the church shrinks. Adam Kay of Duke University discovered that church and state have a “[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ed70/6904ff2959ec495fb0816dcbf2c19b967fdd.pdf hydraulic relationship]”: Events “that lower [[faith]] in one of these external systems (e.g., the government) lead to subsequent increases in faith in the other (e.g., [[God]]).” Another study found that increased welfare spending “in a specific year predicted lower religiosity one to two years later.” It [https://blog.acton.org/archives/101251-gods-power-can-be-outsourced-to-the-government-study.html concluded], “The power and order emanating from God can be outsourced to the government.”...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...faith in the transcendent gets crowded out by faith in [[socialism]]’s [[utopia]]n promise of equality-of-outcome on earth. This path transformed Michael Harrington from a daily communicant volunteering in the Catholic Worker movement to the [[atheism|atheistic]] founder of the Democratic Socialists of America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.eurasiareview.com/21122019-how-socialism-causes-atheism-oped/ How Socialism Causes Atheism – OpEd]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
''This section confuses &amp;quot;interpretation&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ideology of '''Socialism''' is subject to a variety of interpretations. From a conservative perspective, Marxist socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production are seized and monopolized by the government sometimes without compensation to the builders of the [[capital]]. Investments, production, distribution, income, prices, and economic justice are administered by a government [[nomenklatura]] that regulates the transfer of money, goods (including capital goods), and services primarily through taxation, regulation and aggressive institutionalized coercion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some socialists reject this description. Democratic socialists advocate a system of governance based on the principles of [[solidarity]], [[equality]] and [[liberty]], viewing these principles as interconnected. They believe increased socio-economic equality is associated with increased practical freedom to fulfill human potential. In many countries, such as Britain, socialist movements have been built on Christian, democratic and co-operative bases, embracing the notion that individuals should 'treat others as they would wish to be treated', and arguing that all individuals have a moral responsibility for the welfare of other members of their society. Socialism seeks to prioritize human welfare over other goals, such as profit and wealth accumulation by elites; it views increased redistribution of wealth as vital to securing greater freedom and happiness for the bulk of the people. Though this rosy picture of socialism is appealing to many, it ignores what Hayek called &amp;quot;[[the road to serfdom]].&amp;quot;  Though in theory socialism is an idealized, egalitarian form of economics, in practice it means rule by labor bosses who minimize individualism and economic growth in the name of equality and benefits for the working class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Karl Marx]] considered socialism to be a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. In his view, socialism is summed up by the expression: &amp;quot;From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.&amp;quot; A major criticism of socialism is that it infringes individual rights in favor of the populace. In a very real sense, politics in the Western World throughout the 20th century was shaped by the conflict between socialist and capitalist governmental policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although socialist parties are common in Europe, the leading examples all currently embrace some free enterprise, individual property rights and certain other aspects of capitalism although leading European Socialists are very critical of America. In many European countries, socialism has been changing to [[Social democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Hayek]] and [[Ludwig von Mises]] were important critics of socialism, particularly regarding what is known as the Socialist Calculation Debate.  Hayek and Mises argued that a socialist economy would face information constraints that would prevent even well-intentioned planners from efficiently allocating resources.  That is, the planners would not know how much a battleship or a hospital cost, and could not efficiently allocate resources among different choices.  This criticism should be considered as compatible with, but independent of, criticisms based on [[Public choice theory]] that bring into consideration the incentives of political actors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Svetlana Kunin, who lived in the Soviet Union until 1980 explains how the system worked: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Life in the USSR modeled the socialist ideal. God-based religion was suppressed and replaced with cultlike adoration for political figures....Only the ruling class of communist leaders had access to special stores, medicine and accommodations that could compare to those in the West. The rest of the citizenry had to deal with permanent shortages of food and other necessities, and had access to free but inferior, unsanitary and low-tech medical care.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
USSR, 1959: I am a &amp;quot;young pioneer&amp;quot; in school. History classes remind us that there is a higher authority than their parents and teachers: the leaders of the Communist Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Those who left Russia found a different set of values in America: freedom of religion, speech, individual pursuits, the right to private property and free enterprise....These opportunities let the average immigrant live a better life than many elites in the Soviet Communist Party...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The slogans of &amp;quot;fairness and equality&amp;quot; sound better than the slogans of capitalism. But unlike at the beginning of the 20th century, when these slogans and ideas were yet to be tested, we have accumulated history and reality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/SpecialReport.aspx?id=512665 ''The Perspective Of A Russian Immigrant''], ''Investors Business Daily,'' 09/10/2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A government which adheres to economic socialistic principles also tends to have cultures which prize unmerited equality among citizen and criminal alike, and through extension of socialistic welfare policies, between the chronically employed and the chronically unemployed, by ensuring both groups receive income though only one group works for income. This enables people otherwise healthy to not seek gainful employment because they will receive income no matter their actions, thus providing no incentive to produce. The economies of socialistic governments are thus weak and riddled with flaws, such as expecting increased production from a reduced workforce, and when engendered with a progressive culture, which simply means people who do are the same as people who do not, eventually fall under the weight of their own poorly managed and over-extended public welfare institutions. Public welfare also decreases personal charity, thus making the people dependent on the aid of the government since charitable aid, such as from a church, is discouraged by the secular nature of socialistic nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialists occasionally appeal to the fact that God, in the Old Testament, commanded His own nation to surrender a tenth of its proceeds for the maintenance of the priests and for the care of the sickly and weak. But, while fallen men, and their secular and pagan nations, shall always struggle to understand the righteous balances between government and liberty.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;npr&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.npr.org/2011/08/23/139761274/how-the-a-p-changed-the-way-we-shop ''The Great A&amp;amp;P and the Struggle for Small Business in America''], &amp;quot;NPR’s interview of the book’s author, Marc Levinson&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (i.e., between local and national logistics, as well as between the logistics of the individual person and those of his community) the mark of socialism is the general allowance for a naive, and willingly ignorant, adult sub-population whose members prefer, despite the limitations imposed by bureaucratic accountability, to live under all the securities rightly afforded in the fallen world only to infants. In the unfallen world, such security was a given for all persons, but without any of the bureaucracy required in the fallen world for maintaining it. In the fallen world, such security is an unattainable ideal, so that the more is done to attain it, the more the society suffers under the requisite bureaucracy. And, while the initial policy made toward that ideal is the creation of an executive class or executive vocation, such as monarchies and professional armies,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=1Sa&amp;amp;c=8&amp;amp;t=KJV#19 ''First Samuel 8:19-20''] Blue Letter Bible&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wbur.org/media-player?url=http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2011/09/29/consequences-combat-vietnam&amp;amp;title=The+Consequences+Of+Combat&amp;amp;segment=consequences-combat-vietnam&amp;amp;pubdate=2011-09-29&amp;amp;source=hereandnow ''Interview of Vietnam war veteran, and '''What It Is Like To Go To War''' author, Karl Marlantes, on NPR's Here And Now'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there is a 'tipping point' in the creation of bureaucratic entities beyond which any civilization cannot help but increasingly lose its footing in the struggle to balance all its righteous human interests. The result is an ever-increasing proportion of that civilization's total population which, for all variety of reasons, becomes enslaved to their own demands for that ideal of security. When there is no judge who judges righteously, when all the people make the laws, and when the power of money is used to try to stay ahead of the natural consequences of unrighteousness, the 'bad money' cannot help but drive out the 'good money', until the 'Bank of Reality' is forced to call in the loan, and the civilization implodes to the point that it falls victim also to militant invaders and, or, to unmanageable internal unrest.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;npr&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Past Socialist Countries==&lt;br /&gt;
===Chile===&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist socialist leader [[Salvador Allende]] was elected in Chile in 1970 in a minority government run by the Popular Unity Party. Allende's economic policy, known as the Vuskovic Plan, sought to achieve transition to socialism. The Vuskovic Plan involved nationalization of large foreign enterprises, land redistribution to farmers, and redistribution of income. The majority in Parliament never supported it and the plan was never carried out as Allende was overthrown by the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Socialist Countries (Current)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Cuba]]===&lt;br /&gt;
Communist leader [[Fidel Castro]] violently overthrew the Cuban government in the 1950s and has declared Cuba to be communist since then, nationalizing millions of dollars worth of American-owned property. It is notable that Fidel Castro originally self-defined as [[liberal]], before coming out openly as a communist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;esrc=s&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;cd=5&amp;amp;ved=0CGoQFjAE&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fib-global-history-ii-period-5.aspen.high.schoolfusion.us%2Fmodules%2Flocker%2Ffiles%2Fget_group_file.phtml%3Ffid%3D6868636%26gid%3D1176955%26sessionid%3D0&amp;amp;ei=o74IUPDNOqPp6wGbtPGxCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1bEoHrxurCF_WL1OPKMxIb4hCTw Fidel Castro - His Rise and Rule of Cuba]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today, Cuba faces copious economic problems and the people lack their fundamental rights. (Fidel's brother [[Raul Castro]] now runs the country, having taken it over from his ailing brother Fidel.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[North Korea]]'s form of communism is in the form of &amp;quot;Juche&amp;quot; - a doctrine established by [[Kim Il Sung]] and carried on by his son [[Kim Jong Il]] and after his death by the current leader [[Kim Jong-un]]. Although it is investing heavily in nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, extreme poverty on the verge of starvation is the fate of the people, who are very tightly controlled. The country has little to no electrical power at night outside the capital, which can be verified by looking at nighttime satellite photos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epod.usra.edu/archive/epodviewer.php3?oid=87488&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Venezuela===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Venezuelan-Garbage-Truck-640x480 (2).jpg|right|250px|thumb|[[Venezuela]]ns eating &amp;quot;Bernie Burgers&amp;quot; out of a garbage truck.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mediaite.com/online/video-of-venezuelans-eating-out-of-a-garbage-truck-led-maduro-to-walk-out-of-jorge-ramos-interview/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist policies of president-for-life Hugo Chavez have destroyed the economy of that oil-rich nation. In 2009, he seized the Venezuelan operations of U.S. based Cargill in order to tighten his grip on the shrinking food supply in his country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/venezuela/4938993/Venezuelas-Hugo-Chavez-tightens-state-control-of-food-amid-rocketing-inflation-and-food-shortages.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the death of Chavez, [[Nicolás Maduro]] continues his policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Countires===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Ortega]], the dictator of [[Nicaragua]], is a strong ally of Venezuela and Cuba. [[China]] and [[Vietnam]] have abolished the Socialist economy but are still governed by Communist parties. Other countries who are controlled by Socialist parties are [[Laos]], [[Angola]], [[Mozambique]] and [[Moldova]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes on Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
Comparative quotes are given from the top [[Left-wing]] - [[Socialist]] - [[National Socialist]] (a.k.a. [[Nazi]]) - [[Marxist]] - [[Communist]] leaders and their critics in order to better understand the commonality of the end result of their similar philosophy taken to its fruition by the [[big government]] [[welfare state]]-[[nanny state]]-[[police state]] by [[leftist]] [[globalist]]-[[statist]]-socialist-communists. For more examples, see [[Nazism and socialism]]. From these quotes one can see little difference between Socialists, Nazis, Communists, Marxists. Communist regimes killed 60 million in the 20th century through [[genocide]], according to [[Le Monde]] and more than 100 million people according to ''The Black Book of Communism''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from National Socialist's Adolph Hitler===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Then will come a [[National Socialism|National Socialist]] State tribunal; then will November, 1918, be expiated; then the [[mass murder|heads will roll]].&lt;br /&gt;
** testimony at a trial of German officers, Leipzig, in 1930.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We have to put a stop to the idea that it is a part of everybody's [[unalienable rights|civil rights]] to [[freedom of speech|say whatever he pleases]].&lt;br /&gt;
** transcript of a conversation (22 February 1942)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;National socialism is the determination to create a [[slave|new man]]. There will no longer exist any individual arbitrary [[free will|will]], nor realms in which the individual belongs to himself. The time of happiness as a private matter is over.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted in Joachim C. Fest (1974), ''Hitler''. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, p.&amp;amp;nbsp;533.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I have sympathy for Mr. [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt|Roosevelt]], because he marches straight toward his objectives over Congress, lobbies and bureaucracy.&amp;quot; Hitler went on to note that he was the sole leader in Europe who expressed &amp;quot;understanding of the methods and motives of President Roosevelt.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.fff.org/freedom/0795a.asp] ''New York Times'' 1934, quoted from John Toland: ''Adolf Hitler: The Definitive Biography''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quotes from National Socialist's Heinrich Himmler ===&lt;br /&gt;
From the Nazi party ([[National Socialism]]) [[SS]] leader [[Heinrich Himmler]]:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;In the course of history periods of capitalism and socialism alternate with one another; capitalism is the unnatural, socialism the natural [[economic system]]...The [[Nazi|National Socialists]] and the [[Communists|Red Front]] have the same aspirations. The [[Jew]]s falsified the Revolution in the form of [[Marxism]] and that failed to bring fulfillment.&amp;quot;—Speech in [[Potsdam]] (13 October 1926), quoted in Peter Longerich, Heinrich Himmler (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;92–93.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The best political weapon is the [[terrorism|weapon of terror]]. Cruelty commands respect. Men may hate us. But, we don't ask for their love; only for their fear.&amp;quot;—Quoted in &amp;quot;Visions of Reality - A Study of Abnormal Perception and Behavior&amp;quot; - by Alberto Rivas - Psychology - 2007 - Page 162&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quotes from Lenin ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Vladimir Lenin]] stated:&lt;br /&gt;
* “The way to crush the [[middle class]] is to grind them between the millstones of [[taxation]] and [[inflation]].”&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The best revolutionary is youth devoid of [[moral]]s.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;A lie told often enough becomes the truth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The goal of socialism is communism.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;There are no morals in [[politics]] there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Give us the child for 8 years and it will be a [[Bolshevik]] forever.&amp;quot; (see [[Public school values]] and [[Professor values]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Stalin===&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Darwin-Stalin connection'' describes the brutal [[Soviet]] dictator [[Josef Stalin]] who [[mass murder|murdered millions]] of people, giving credit to [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]]'s book for his outlook in life:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The death of one man is a tragedy, the [[mass murder|death of millions]] is a statistic.&amp;quot; ~ to [[Churchill]], 1945.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Death is the solution to all problems. No man - no problem&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Ideas are more powerful than [[guns]]. We would [[gun control|not let our enemies have guns]], why should we let them have ideas?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;It is enough that the people know there was an [[election]]. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The only real power comes out of a long [[rifle]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;When we hang the [[capitalist]]s they will sell us the rope we use.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Leon Trotsky===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Repression for the attainment of economic ends is a necessary weapon of the socialist [[dictatorship]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leon Trotsky]] in ''Terrorism and Communism : A Reply to Karl Kautsky'' (1920; 1975), p.&amp;amp;nbsp;153&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The road to socialism lies through a period of the highest possible intensification of the principle of the state … Just as a lamp, before going out, shoots up in a brilliant flame, so the state, before disappearing, assumes the form of the dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e., the most ruthless form of state, which embraces the life of the citizens authoritatively in every direction...&lt;br /&gt;
** ''Terrorism and Communism : A Reply to Karl Kautsky'' (1920; 1975), p. 177&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Leon Trotsky in his book The [[Russian Revolution]], 1930&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Root out the counterrevolutionaries without mercy, lock up suspicious characters in concentration camps... Shirkers will be [[extermination camp|shot]], regardless of past service.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Statement of 1918, as quoted in ''Trotsky : The Eternal Revolutionary'' (1996) by Dmitri Volkogonov, p.&amp;amp;nbsp;213&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Mao===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mao Zedong]], responsible for the deaths of 77 million [[Chinese]] states:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Every Communist must grasp the truth: Political power grows out of the barrel of a [[gun]].&amp;quot;—The [[Little Red Book]], 1964&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Our principle is that the [[Communist Party|Party]] commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes on Kim Il-sung===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Kim Il-sung]] took the communist [[cult of personality]] to a new level.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barbara Demick (2010) ''Nothing to Envy: Real Lives in North Korea'', Granta, page 45, ISBN 9781847081414&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In Korea, the Americans have far exceed the Hitlerites!&amp;quot;—by Kim Il-sung&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;**Kim Il-sung to the [[Swedish]] communist leader [[Frank Baude]] in 1993.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;When it comes to the orchestration of terror, Kim Jong-il is a natural born genius.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Kim Duk Hong]] quoted in ''[[BBC News]]'' (21 July 2003) &amp;quot;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent/3065101.stm Inside the mind of Kim Jong-il]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Pol Pot===&lt;br /&gt;
As ruler of [[Cambodia]] Pol Pot was responsible for [[mass murder|exterminating]] 2 million people by [[genocide]]. That's a quarter of the country's population:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Exterminate the 50 million [[Vietnamese]]... and purify the masses of the [[Cambodian]] people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Phnom Penh radio broadcast by [[Pol Pot]] of the [[Khmer Rouge]] (May 10, 1978) ([http://www.enotes.com/genocide-encyclopedia/khmer-rouge])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Related Quotes from Others===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[[Socialist]]s ignore the side of man that is of the spirit.  They can provide shelter, fill your belly with bacon and beans, treat you when you are ill, all the things that are guaranteed to a prisoner or a slave.  They don't understand that we dream - yes, even of some time owning a yacht.&amp;quot; -- [[President]] [[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9ut8fnmwVkwC&amp;amp;pg=PA91#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false|last1=Skinner|first1=Kiron K.|last2=Anderson|first2=Annelise A.|title=Stories in His Own Hand: The Everyday Wisdom of Ronald Reagan ; Edited with an Introduction and Commentary by Kiron K. Skinner, Annelise Anderson, Martin Anderson ; Foreword by George P. Shultz|date=2001|publisher=Simon and Schuster|isbn=9781416584506}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the [[income redistribution|equal sharing]] of misery.&amp;quot; -- [[Winston Churchill]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I've always doubted that the socialists had a leg to stand on intellectually&amp;quot; -- [[Friedrich Hayek]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The trouble is with socialism, which resembles a form of [[mental illness]] more than it does a philosophy&amp;quot; -- [[L. Neil Smith]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Socialists cry &amp;quot;Power to the people&amp;quot;, and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean — [[Nanny state|power over people]], [[Police state|power to the State]].&amp;quot; -- [[Margaret Thatcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;All socialism involves [[slavery]]&amp;quot; -- [[Herbert Spencer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Wonderful system, wrong species&amp;quot;—Edward O. Wilson; who believed that collectivism was better suited to an ant than a human.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/homo-consumericus/201101/communismsocialism-great-idea-wrong-species-e-o-wilson Communism/Socialism: “Great Idea. Wrong Species.” (E. O. Wilson)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to ''consolidate'' and ''control'' the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all.&amp;quot;—Gary Allen &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=UuKnhw27vUwC&amp;amp;q=%22if+one+understands+that+socialism+is+not+a%22&amp;amp;dq=%22if+one+understands+that+socialism+is+not+a%22&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0CDEQ6AEwBGoVChMI9b6puNfryAIVxSQmCh2CHw7j None Dare Call It Conspiracy], page 33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We face a hostile ideology; (Socialism i) global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose and insidous in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully there is call for not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of questions but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain despite every provocation on our charted course towards permanent peace and human betterment.&amp;quot; - Dwight D. Eisenhower, Farewell Address&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Big government]] [[Welfare state]] leads to [[socialist]] [[Nanny state]], leads to [[communist]] [[Police state]] - Don't think Socialism-Communism is incompatible with [[Islam]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control]] - key element to create a police state&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of atheist and agnostic pseudosciences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dictatorship]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dictatorship of the proletariat]]: [[Class warfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[List of Socialist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Single-party state]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mobocracy]], [[Social Effects of the Theory of Evolution]], [[Anti-Semitism]], [[Communist Racism]], [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nazi Party|National Socialist German Workers' Party]] (Nazi Party)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nazism and socialism]]: [[National Socialism]] - the Nazis were elitist [[Police state]] [[liberals]] not [[conservative]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Left-wing Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Resisting Socialist Landfills‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Champagne socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33169-socialism-explained Socialism Explained], by Charles Scaliger of ''The New American''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/etexts/hayekintellectuals.pdf The Intellectuals and Socialism], By F.A. Hayek, ''The University of Chicago Law Review'', (Spring 1949), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;417–420, 421-423, 425-433. &lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109587/socialism Socialism] Encyclopædia Britannica.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/socialism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Socialism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/socialism-Christian.html How should a Christian view socialism?], by [[GotQuestions]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/socialism-poverty-democrats-standard-of-living/ You Can See America's Future Under Socialism, And It Isn't Pretty], ''Investor's Business Daily'', October 25, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tomroganthinks.com/2017/11/socialism-sucks.html?m=1 Socialism isn't good for you], Tom Rogan, November 23, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-eight-politics-how-the-devil-sows-chaos-part-i_2592414.html Chapter Eight: How Communism Sows Chaos in Politics (Part I)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-eight-politics-how-communism-sows-chaos-part-ii_2594599.html Chapter Eight: How Communism Sows Chaos in Politics (Part II)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-nine-the-communist-economic-trap-part-i_2596547.html Chapter Nine: The Communist Economic Trap (Part I)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-nine-the-communist-economic-trap-part-ii_2605465.html Chapter Nine: The Communist Economic Trap (Part II)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Busky, Donald F. ''Communism in History and Theory: From Utopian Socialism to the Fall of the Soviet Union'' (2002) [https://www.amazon.com/Communism-History-Theory-Utopian-Socialism/dp/027597748X/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-24 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dougherty, Jude P. &amp;quot;Socialist Man: A Psychological Profile,&amp;quot; ''Modern Age'' Volume 46, Number 1-2; Winter/Spring 2004 [http://www.mmisi.org/ma/46_1-2/dougherty.pdf online edition], a conservative critique&lt;br /&gt;
*Laslett, John, ed. ''Failure of a Dream: Essays in the History of American Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lindemann, Albert S. ''A History of European Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Gary Marks. ''It Didn't Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States'' (2001), Lipset was a leading conservative scholar [https://www.amazon.com/Didnt-Happen-Here-Socialism-Failed/dp/0393322548/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Malia, Martin. ''Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia'' (1995) [https://www.amazon.com/Soviet-Tragedy-History-Socialism-Russia/dp/0684823136/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761853&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Muravchik, Joshua. ''Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism'' (2003) by conservative historian [https://www.amazon.com/Heaven-Earth-Rise-Fall-Socialism/dp/1893554783/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Novak, Michael. ''Capitalism and Socialism: A Theological Inquiry '' (1988) [https://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Socialism-Theological-Michael-Novak/dp/0844721549/ref=sr_1_19?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-19 excerpt and text search], by leading conservative scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Nove, Alec. ''An Economic History of the USSR 1917-1991'' (3rd ed. 1993) &lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''Communism: A History'' (2003), by a leading conservative &lt;br /&gt;
* Suny, Ronald Grigor. ''The Soviet Experiment: Russia, the USSR, and the Successor States.'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24265044# online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist Terminology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Oppression]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Leftism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Police State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Welfare State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Man-Made Disasters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Threats]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Shobson20&amp;diff=1646825</id>
		<title>User talk:Shobson20</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Shobson20&amp;diff=1646825"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T18:13:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Please assume good faith with my editing. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;--Unsigned comment by [[user:Shobson20]]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you need anything, or have any questions, feel free to let me know! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:58, 26 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, since you brought it up, I have accepted Jesus Christ, I believe in the US constitution, I believe in the 2nd Amendment, I am pro-military, I am Patriotic toward America, and I want all of the tags on my user page that show this. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 16:54, 26 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Okay, that shouldn't be too difficult.  If you want to learn about userboxes and browse the existing options, you will want to look here: [[Conservapedia:Userboxes]].  Or, if you prefer, you can just use the applicable code I have on my profile page.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::First, you need a container, so put &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{userboxtop|About Me}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; on the top, and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Userboxbottom}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; on the bottom (other page content goes after this). ''The &amp;quot;About Me&amp;quot; message on the opening tag can be changed to whatever you prefer.'' Then, just load in the userboxes you want.  I am using &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User Christian2}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to say I am a Christian, and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User American}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; to display my patriotism.  I don't have a box specifically for the Constitution, expect for the limited government one: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User limited govt}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. You can use that, or use this more straightforward one: &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User Constitution}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. Regarding the second amendment, I assume you are specificly talking about the right to have and bear arms.  For that, you would probably want to use &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User progun}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.  For the military, you probably want &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{User patriot}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: I think that covers everything, but if I missed anything, let me know.  Also, feel free to look around for others you might like by [[Conservapedia:Userboxes#Userbox_Index|clicking through the categories]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If all of my assumptions were correct, then you will want to put the following on your profile page:&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox|&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{userboxtop|About Me}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{User Christian2}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{User American}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{User Constitution}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{User progun}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{User patriot}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userboxbottom}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Let me know if there's anything else I can do! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:47, 27 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Troll blocking ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Surprisingly, it's been 5 days since CP has had a troll blocked. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 01:27, 15 June 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:They come and go in waves. I'm sure they will be back, but that's no problem.  We'll deal with them as we always do, when they return.  Also, I don't know how much this has been helping, but I've been blocking many IP addresses (using [[User:DavidB4-bot|my bot]]) which can be used for sock accounts. &lt;br /&gt;
:The thing is, they know this, but just want to waste our time and bother us. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:09, 15 June 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Are those IP addresses used on VPNs? Someone who uses a VPN can use alter their IP address at will to get around IP address blocks.[[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 22:37, 15 June 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::So what does it take to have the ability to hide revisions on the history list? Does it take full admin privileges? [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 21:35, 15 June 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, only full administrators can do that.  You can ask admins like Karajou or Aschlafly to do specific hides, if needed. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:51, 15 June 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think DMorris can also do it, and he's somewhat active as well so you could try asking him, too. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:54, 15 June 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Regarding trolls coming and going in waves, this is true.  The worst of it most often comes in the summertime, when school is out and some kids are bored and have nothing better to do, so they go online (most often without parental supervision) and get into mischief there. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 22:26, 15 June 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::And regarding your question about the IP addresses, you are correct that they can mask their IP, but it is those mask IPs we often block, so that they have a harder time of getting through.  I don't want to discuss it in detail on a public talk page, though. They might learn something we would prefer they didn't know.&lt;br /&gt;
::Northwest, I hadn't really thought about summer vacation for schools, but that makes sense--good point! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:13, 16 June 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
It didn't last, 3 users recently got blocked. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 19:41, 18 June 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They waste time making troll edits. I can undo their vandalism in seconds and then hit the block button. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 16:45, 6 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Something I heard from an Atheist ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have seen twice from Atheists, that if they actually observed molecules-to-man evolution, that would somehow be evidence against it. Let me get this straight, If you could somehow travel back in time and live for the billions of years that molecules-to-man evolution would take and directly observe what you claim happened back then, it would somehow DISprove it? That's like saying that observing objects falling would somehow disprove gravity. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 19:16, 20 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Congratulations! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations on your promotion! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:28, 16 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I thought of saying something on my user page along the lines of &amp;quot;watch out, trolls, I'm coming after you now!&amp;quot; But I decided not to because I feel that it's inappropriate because:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#It would sound like I was bragging and Matthew 23:12 says: &amp;quot;For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.&amp;quot; and James 4:6 says: &amp;quot;But he gives us more grace. That is why Scripture says: 'God opposes the proud but shows favor to the humble.'&amp;quot; In the original Greek, the word for proud means &amp;quot;to puff one's self up.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
#I believe that Andy expects a certain level of decorum from people on this site, especially those to whom he has granted certain admin privileges. I think it is important to exercise a certain level of maturity and responsibility when you've been put in a position where your voice represents this site. After all, Jesus did not proudly flaunt the authority given to him by his Father.[[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 00:44, 16 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That sounds like a wise choice--those are good reasons. Also, the way I see it, turning our focus to vandals gives them a sort of victory--they will have changed our behavior. However, there is nothing wrong with countering attacks to a reasonable degree.&lt;br /&gt;
:::As just a bit of housekeeping, please avoid blocking IP addresses indefinitely. The &amp;quot;Automatically block the last IP address used by this user...&amp;quot; option enables autoblock, which is very helpful and should typically be used.  However, some IPs belong to entire schools, libraries, and companies, plus IP addresses get reassigned over time.  Blocking them for long periods of time can prevent legitimate users from editing. For now, probably figure that a ban using autoblock should not typically be longer than a year. You can disable autoblock and ban an account permanently, but the IP will not be blocked, so they can just make another account. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:19, 16 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You also have rules about not changing block status set by a higher level admin too, don't you? [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 01:40, 16 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I don't know if there's an official rule, but unofficially, we're not supposed to change admin blocks. Also, we strongly discourage the use of indefinite blocks. For regular vandals, just do six months or one year (Andy also prefers 3-month blocks), and for very serious vandals, do 2-5 years. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:58, 16 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I've also seen an admin tell a sysop not to block over potentially contentious edits and leave that decision to the senior admins. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 16:31, 16 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Where is the &amp;quot;User Name Policy&amp;quot; written? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have seen users get blocked because of a &amp;quot;user name policy&amp;quot; which is not written anywhere that I can find by any normal searching means. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 23:47, 6 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please see [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Member Accounts]] -- I think this is the relevant phrase in the section: &amp;quot;Obscene or offensive usernames will be blocked on sight.&amp;quot; --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:52, 7 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New potential article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's something I want to make but don't know if it should be an essay or mainspace article. In general, it's about why left-wing ideas are antithetical to biblical principles. From the obvious to not-so-obvious, I want to cover them all in one space. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 20:38, 16 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Great idea -- if the article is making an argument, it would be better to make it an essay (you could still add it to the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections of certain relevant articles). If the article is describing rather than arguing, it can be mainspace. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:44, 16 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Here's an example, the Left is big on virtue signalling, right? Read Matthew Chapter 6. Leftism also fosters a culture of envy of &amp;quot;the 1 percent&amp;quot; and envy is named among sins several places. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 20:57, 16 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you want it to be a mainspace article, I suggest as a title something along the line of [[Liberalism and biblical principles]] -- as an encyclopedia article, its tone would have to be one of explanation rather than argument. Please keep in mind that a mainspace article is generally expected to have more sources and stricter formatting guidelines. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:08, 16 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::In a mainspace article, I don't think I could get away with saying &amp;quot;Leftists express a sense of envy every time they talk about some kind of 'privilege' such as 'white privilege' or 'male privilege' which is usually an excuse for their own under-achievement.&amp;quot; [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 21:28, 16 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why does this site keep breaking? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No other website I've ever seen breaks down as often as this. Is anyone else frustrated? [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 22:58, 23 March 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We're having a problem with the web host...sorry about that. For now, please save a backup of any edits you make.  --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:06, 23 March 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So it's not another DDOS attack? [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 23:16, 23 March 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, our hosting provider did an upgrade, but botched it up.  They are working on fixing it now. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:18, 23 March 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It should be fixed now--let us know if you have more issues like this. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:44, 24 March 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Finally unlocked ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Locking this site all day yesterday was absurd and ridiculous. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 11:05, 26 March 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Was that why I couldn't edit at all yesterday? --[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|Your reminder that Biden committed quid pro joe]]'''''&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:22, 26 March 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, I emailed DavidB4 about it several times and he said he contacted Andy, BUT NOBODY DID ANYTHING. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 11:26, 26 March 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::At least we can make edits today. I do wish I had an edit tag though... --[[User:Liberaltears|Liberaltears]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;'''''[[User talk:Liberaltears|Your reminder that Biden committed quid pro joe]]'''''&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:38, 26 March 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Your inquiry about Mercian ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Who is &amp;quot;Mercian,&amp;quot; and why do you send so many messages to him/her? Is (s)he from that other infamous website-that-shall-not-be-named? [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 22:36, 28 March 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have decided to no longer pay attention to ankle-biters. If you create content that gets a lot of views, you are bound to get some unreasonable critics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Nehemiah]] in the Old Testament chose to ignore his unreasonable critics. Often that is the best course of action.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course, there is a place for listening to constructive criticism and even unreasonable people can sometimes offer valid criticism. After all is said and done, you just have to have a proper balance in this matter and not be overly concerned about critics - especially ones of the unreasonable variety. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lastly, to answer you question, Mercian is the editor of an atheist/agnostic wiki that you alluded to.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:38, 16 April 2020 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They are capitalist with a welfare state.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.thelocal.dk/20151101/danish-pm-in-us-denmark-is-not-socialist&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transgender&amp;diff=1646821</id>
		<title>Transgender</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transgender&amp;diff=1646821"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T17:47:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Transgender''' has two common definitions; both of them are forms of [[gender confusion]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Similar to [[transsexual]], but without having had a sex-change operation.&lt;br /&gt;
# As a synonym for transsexual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
61-98% of young people outgrow their [[gender confusion]] if allowed to progress naturally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ristori J, Steensma TD. Gender dysphoria in childhood. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28(1):13-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;transgender&amp;quot; is not to be confused with a whole host of &amp;quot;gender identities&amp;quot; (which [[liberal]]s see as separate from biological [[sex]]) under the umbrella of '''genderqueer''', which includes, besides transgender:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bigender (both man and woman)&lt;br /&gt;
* Agender (neither man nor woman)&lt;br /&gt;
* Genderfluid (alternating between genders)&lt;br /&gt;
* Third gender (found in [[India]]n culture, some [[American Indian]] cultures, and also invented by modern-day people)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reputable scientific &amp;amp; social organizations which affirm the validity of transgender people include the American Psychological Association, the American Medical Association and the American Psychoanalytic Association. This shows lefitst bias in these organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Transgender activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Bradford (February 28, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/22/transgender-movement-rejected-growing-body-researc/ Growing body of research rejects transgender movement]. ''The Washington Times''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Shupe, Jamie (March 10, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/03/10/i-was-americas-first-non-binary-person-it-was-all-a-sham/ I Was America’s First ‘Nonbinary’ Person. It Was All a Sham.] ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved April 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transgender&amp;diff=1646820</id>
		<title>Transgender</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transgender&amp;diff=1646820"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T17:46:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Transgender''' has two common definitions; both of them are forms of [[gender confusion]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Similar to [[transsexual]], but without having had a sex-change operation.&lt;br /&gt;
# As a synonym for transsexual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
61-98% of young people outgrow their [[gender confusion]] if allowed to progress naturally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ristori J, Steensma TD. Gender dysphoria in childhood. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28(1):13-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;transgender&amp;quot; is not to be confused with a whole host of &amp;quot;gender identities&amp;quot; (which [[liberal]]s see as separate from biological [[sex]]) under the umbrella of '''genderqueer''', which includes, besides transgender:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bigender (both man and woman)&lt;br /&gt;
* Agender (neither man nor woman)&lt;br /&gt;
* Genderfluid (alternating between genders)&lt;br /&gt;
* Third gender (found in [[India]]n culture, some [[American Indian]] cultures, and also invented by modern-day people)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reputable scientific &amp;amp; social organizations which affirm the validity of transgender people include the American Psychological Association,  American Medical Association and the American Psychoanalytic Association. This shows lefitst bias in these organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Transgender activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Bradford (February 28, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/22/transgender-movement-rejected-growing-body-researc/ Growing body of research rejects transgender movement]. ''The Washington Times''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Shupe, Jamie (March 10, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/03/10/i-was-americas-first-non-binary-person-it-was-all-a-sham/ I Was America’s First ‘Nonbinary’ Person. It Was All a Sham.] ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved April 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transgender&amp;diff=1646819</id>
		<title>Transgender</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transgender&amp;diff=1646819"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T17:46:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Transgender''' has two common definitions; both of them are forms of [[gender confusion]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Similar to [[transsexual]], but without having had a sex-change operation.&lt;br /&gt;
# As a synonym for transsexual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
61-98% of young people outgrow their [[gender confusion]] if allowed to progress naturally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ristori J, Steensma TD. Gender dysphoria in childhood. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28(1):13-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;transgender&amp;quot; is not to be confused with a whole host of &amp;quot;gender identities&amp;quot; (which [[liberal]]s see as separate from biological [[sex]]) under the umbrella of '''genderqueer''', which includes, besides transgender:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bigender (both man and woman)&lt;br /&gt;
* Agender (neither man nor woman)&lt;br /&gt;
* Genderfluid (alternating between genders)&lt;br /&gt;
* Third gender (found in [[India]]n culture, some [[American Indian]] cultures, and also invented by modern-day people)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reputable scientific &amp;amp; social organizations which affirm the validity of transgender people include the American Psychological Association,  American Medical Association and the American Psychoanalytic Association. https://transcendlegal.org/medical-organization-statements&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This shows lefitst bias in these organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Transgender activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Bradford (February 28, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/22/transgender-movement-rejected-growing-body-researc/ Growing body of research rejects transgender movement]. ''The Washington Times''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Shupe, Jamie (March 10, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/03/10/i-was-americas-first-non-binary-person-it-was-all-a-sham/ I Was America’s First ‘Nonbinary’ Person. It Was All a Sham.] ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved April 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transgender&amp;diff=1646818</id>
		<title>Transgender</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transgender&amp;diff=1646818"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T17:45:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Transgender''' has two common definitions; both of them are forms of [[gender confusion]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Similar to [[transsexual]], but without having had a sex-change operation.&lt;br /&gt;
# As a synonym for transsexual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
61-98% of young people outgrow their [[gender confusion]] if allowed to progress naturally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ristori J, Steensma TD. Gender dysphoria in childhood. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28(1):13-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;transgender&amp;quot; is not to be confused with a whole host of &amp;quot;gender identities&amp;quot; (which [[liberal]]s see as separate from biological [[sex]]) under the umbrella of '''genderqueer''', which includes, besides transgender:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bigender (both man and woman)&lt;br /&gt;
* Agender (neither man nor woman)&lt;br /&gt;
* Genderfluid (alternating between genders)&lt;br /&gt;
* Third gender (found in [[India]]n culture, some [[American Indian]] cultures, and also invented by modern-day people)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reputable scientific &amp;amp; social organizations which affirm the validity of transgender people include the American Psychological Association, American Medical Association and American Psychoanalytic Association. https://transcendlegal.org/medical-organization-statements&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This shows lefitst bias in these organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Transgender activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Bradford (February 28, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/22/transgender-movement-rejected-growing-body-researc/ Growing body of research rejects transgender movement]. ''The Washington Times''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Shupe, Jamie (March 10, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/03/10/i-was-americas-first-non-binary-person-it-was-all-a-sham/ I Was America’s First ‘Nonbinary’ Person. It Was All a Sham.] ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved April 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transgender&amp;diff=1646817</id>
		<title>Transgender</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Transgender&amp;diff=1646817"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T17:44:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Transgender''' has two common definitions; both of them are forms of [[gender confusion]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Similar to [[transsexual]], but without having had a sex-change operation.&lt;br /&gt;
# As a synonym for transsexual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
61-98% of young people outgrow their [[gender confusion]] if allowed to progress naturally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ristori J, Steensma TD. Gender dysphoria in childhood. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28(1):13-20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term &amp;quot;transgender&amp;quot; is not to be confused with a whole host of &amp;quot;gender identities&amp;quot; (which [[liberal]]s see as separate from biological [[sex]]) under the umbrella of '''genderqueer''', which includes, besides transgender:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bigender (both man and woman)&lt;br /&gt;
* Agender (neither man nor woman)&lt;br /&gt;
* Genderfluid (alternating between genders)&lt;br /&gt;
* Third gender (found in [[India]]n culture, some [[American Indian]] cultures, and also invented by modern-day people)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reputable scientific &amp;amp; social organizations which affirm the validity of transgender people include the American Ps&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ychological Association, American Medical Association and American Psychoanalytic Association. https://transcendlegal.org/medical-organization-statements&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This shows lefitst bias in these organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Transgender activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Bradford (February 28, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/feb/22/transgender-movement-rejected-growing-body-researc/ Growing body of research rejects transgender movement]. ''The Washington Times''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Shupe, Jamie (March 10, 2019). [https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/03/10/i-was-americas-first-non-binary-person-it-was-all-a-sham/ I Was America’s First ‘Nonbinary’ Person. It Was All a Sham.] ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved April 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=1646815</id>
		<title>Socialism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=1646815"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T17:35:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Antifa Dayton attacker.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Dressed in all black with his face covered, Antifa terrorist Connor Betts during the [[Dayton nightclub attack]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cernovich.com/connor-betts-the-dayton-ohio-terrorist-was-a-far-left-wing-activist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Betts stated &amp;quot;I want socialism, and I’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round understanding.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Socialism''' refers to a set of related socio-economic systems based on social ownership of the means of production (as opposed to individuals personally owning them) and political management of the economy. It is a failed system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Scaliger, Charles (September 6, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33172-socialist-realities Socialist Realities]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Williamsen, Kurt; Byas, Steve (September 6, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33171-saving-america-with-socialism Saving America With Socialism?] ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Behreandt, Dennis (September 4, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33170-the-failure-of-the-command-economy The Failure of the Command Economy]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Behreandt, Dennis (September 3, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33168-going-with-fair-healthcare Going With “Fair” Healthcare]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ideology based on [[hate]], [[envy]], and [[mass murder]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Behreandt, Dennis (September 9, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33174-the-deadly-history-of-socialism The Deadly History of Socialism]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 9, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and which promotes [[totalitarianism]] at the expense of [[individual freedom]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scaliger, Charles (September 2, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33169-socialism-explained Socialism Explained]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 2, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Jasper, William F. (December 17, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/34153-socialists-stop-spread-of-success Socialists Stop Spread of Success]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 17, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The movement is responsible for the murder of at least 94 million people over the past 100 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Werth, Nicolas; Panné, Jean-Louis; Paczkowski, Andrzej; Bartosek, Karel; Margolin, Jean-Louis (October 1999), Courtois, Stéphane, ed., ''[https://archive.org/stream/TheBlackBookofCommunism10/the-black-book-of-communism-jean-louis-margolin-1999-communism_djvu.txt  The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression]'', Harvard University Press, p. 4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fundamental flaw of socialism is the belief that one person has the right to the fruit of another person's [[labor]] and [[private property]], for example, that healthcare paid by others is a &amp;quot;human right.&amp;quot; Socialism has led to increased bureaucracy and reduced freedom even in Scandinavia,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meninger, Edward J. (September 10, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33173-do-it-like-denmark Do It Like Denmark?] ''The New American''. Retrieved September 10, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and it has been tried and failed in countries such as the [[United Kingdom]], [[India]], and [[Israel]] during the 20th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Edwards, Lee (October 16, 2019). [https://www.heritage.org/progressivism/commentary/three-nations-tried-socialism-and-rejected-it Three Nations That Tried Socialism and Rejected It]. ''The Heritage Foundation''. Retrieved October 23, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Scandinavia is social democratic and not socialist, but we criticise it anyway because leftists like it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political theory, socialism relies on scapegoating to build a constituent base. For example, that &amp;quot;the rich,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Jews,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;millionaires and billionaires,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the top 1%&amp;quot; are responsible for all of humanity's ills. Socialism targets the youth of a nation and people without life experience using naive, simplistic,  and &amp;quot;feel good&amp;quot; slogans (&amp;quot;[[Medicare for All]],&amp;quot; &amp;quot;tuition-free education,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;free housing.&amp;quot; etc., for example) that on the surface appeal to self-interest, while asking nothing of the hearers to contribute to the economic well being of their fellow citizens or society. Once in power, Socialists compel compliance with [[authoritarian]] decrees (the &amp;quot;individual mandate&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;shared responsibility payment,&amp;quot; for example) suppress criticism, censor [[free speech]], silence or exterminate opposition in order to maintain power for themselves. There is nothing [[democracy|democratic]] about socialism, and terms such as [[democratic socialism]] or [[social democracy]] are [[oxymoron]]s that are typical of Marxist &amp;quot;double speak&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;double think.&amp;quot; Socialist leaders often live in extreme luxury even as they fail to improve the lives of those they rule over,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Maxim (March 11, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lifestyles-of-the-rich-and-socialist-from-chavez-to-castro-leaders-who-lived-the-high-life Lifestyles of the Rich and Socialist: From Chavez to Castro, leaders who lived the high life]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved March 11, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Snowball, Timothy (May 15, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/443228-socialism-is-neither-a-fair-nor-progressive-political-philosophy Socialism is neither a fair nor 'progressive' political philosophy]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved May 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Jasper, William F. (September 11, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33175-socialism-for-your-benefit-or-theirs Socialism: For Your Benefit — or Theirs?] ''The New American''. Retrieved September 11, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and its destructive effects on society often are irreversible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (May 10, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/10/blue-state-blues-venezuela-south-africa-show-socialism-difficult-to-undo/ Blue State Blues: Venezuela, South Africa Show Socialism Difficult to Undo]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 10, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Demaggio, John M. (July 20, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/453913-has-socialism-already-failed-in-the-united-states Has socialism already failed in the United States?] ''The Hill''. Retrieved July 20, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Socialism is fully compatible with &amp;quot;big business,&amp;quot; or [[crony capitalism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Philipp, Joshua (August 7, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-corrupt-romance-between-big-business-and-socialism_2977800.html The Corrupt Romance Between Big Business and Socialism]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved August 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a social theory, the modern [[Democratic party]] uses [[identity politics]] to create a new &amp;quot;oppressed class&amp;quot; of victims which replaces the traditional worker/peasant/proletariat victims of the imaginary &amp;quot;oppressor class&amp;quot; - &amp;quot;the [[bourgeois]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/PkNzYttjSHE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Socialism preys on people who fall victim to the [[sin]]s of [[envy]] and [[covet]]ousness, and raises [[Iconoclasm]] and [[nihilism]] as exalted [[virtue]]s.  Left-wing professors and universities have played a large role in advancing socialist ideology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Maxim (January 18, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/socialism-rising-universities-and-radical-profs-helping-steer-leftward-shift-in-politics Socialism rising: Universities and ‘radical’ profs helping steer leftward shift in politics, critics say]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many individual socialists and groups display juvenile, adolescent, and cult-like behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, socialism is an [[authoritarian]] system which advocates strict [[economic planning|command and control]] of [[income]]s and distribution or rationing of goods and services, including food and healthcare. High taxation to expropriate wealth from the supposed &amp;quot;oppressor class&amp;quot; is common to all socialist regimes. Removal of incentives and demonizing the [[profit]] motive, while expecting common people to produce goods and services, and supply tax revenues to government, for little or no pay is a [[psychotic]] dream.  After exterminating &amp;quot;corporations&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the rich,&amp;quot; the cost burden of government - which controls everything - naturally falls to an impoverished working class, the unemployed, and homeless which previously paid no taxes. And no one can retain anything for themselves because the profit motive is disincentivized or outlawed. Due to its core [[anti-democratic]] and authoritarian precepts, socialism is considered [[treason]]ous to [[America]]'s central ideal of [[liberty]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism at all times has never amounted to more than a [[criminal]] gang that enlists the aid of academics and disgruntled, naive youth and the misfits of society. One of the most well known socialist regimes of the 20th century was the [[Nazi Party|National Socialist German Workers' Party]] (Nazi Party), headed by [[Adolf Hitler]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/adolf_hitler.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Through [[affirmative action]] programs, Nazism granted workers and peasants access to educational and employment opportunities previously only available to the German bourgeois and [[nobility]] (the &amp;quot;oppressor class&amp;quot;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both [[Communism]] and [[Nazism]] are [[totalitarian]] or [[statist]], subverting the rights of individuals to the [[collective]] of a [[single party]]. Nazism deviates from orthodox Marxist theory in substituting racial and ethnic conflict for economic [[class warfare]]. Nazism substituted &amp;quot;[[Jews]]&amp;quot; as the oppressor class, responsible for all societal woes, rather than &amp;quot;the rich,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;[[Republican]]s,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;white males&amp;quot; as modern leftists do. The [[Second World War]] was a life and death struggle between two [[leftwing]] interpretations of socialism - both atheistic and subverting the rights of  individuals to the state, one considering &amp;quot;equality&amp;quot; to apply only to members of a nation or race, the other [[multicultural]] and [[globalist]]. After the [[United States]] assisted the [[communist]] victory over [[National Socialism]] (see [[Popular Front liberalism]]), the [[Cold War]] was an effort to suppress the spread of global communism. Socialists consider all forms of [[capitalism]] as &amp;quot;[[fascist]]&amp;quot; (see [[Antifa]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Roots==&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism has its roots in visions of imaginary ideal societies, from thinkers who drew up elaborated designs and concepts for creating what they considered a more equal society, along collectivist lines or abolished [[private property]]; the primary ideas came from British and French thinkers like [[Henri de Saint-Simon|Saint-Simon]], [[Charles Fourier]], Louis Blanc, and [[Robert Owen]] preceded by [[Thomas More]], Tommaso Campanella, and Jean Meslier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historic types==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Backrdv12n2.jpg|right|400px|thumb|The Russian caption reads, &amp;quot;Long live the great unbeatable flag of [[Karl Marx|Marx]], [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]], [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]], [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]]!&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
There are three main kinds of Socialism, all of them are built on the premise of government control of the means of production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Leninism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist Socialism, or '''Leninism''', as revised by [[Vladimir Lenin]] and practiced in the pre-[[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] Soviet Union, was the Socialistic theory developed by Vladimir Lenin during his rise to power. Lenin defined socialism as a transitional stage between capitalism and communism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In striving for socialism, however, we are convinced that it will develop into communism&amp;quot;, Lenin, State and Revolution, Selected Works, Progress publishers, Moscow, 1968, p. 320. (End of chapter four)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Leninism is totalitarian, with no [[democracy]] and all decisions are made by the leaders of the Communist party. Lenin saw the Communist Party as an &amp;quot;elite&amp;quot; that was committed to ending capitalism and instituting socialism in its place and attaining the power by any means possible, including revolution. Lenin was quite mild on the belief, believing that, though controlling of resources was important, the people's will comes first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though [[Bolshevik]] Russia was somewhat more prosperous than its former [[Russian Empire|Tsardom]], Lenin's death in 1924 sparked the overthrow of his Marxist–Leninism and the imposition of [[Stalinism]], the violent, totalitarian belief that went against some of Lenin's ideas (many of Lenin's works were censored by Stalin post-1924).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Democratic&amp;quot; Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ellison-antifa.jpg|right|175px|thumb|[[Democratic National Committee]] Vice-Chair [[Keith Ellison]] promoted Anitfa.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The second form of Socialism (sometimes called &amp;quot;Revisionism&amp;quot;) prevailed in Europe down to the 1970s, and is typified by the [[Fabian Socialism|Fabian Society]] and the British Labour Party. It was inspired by Socialism and closely linked to labor unions that had real power. The goal was for [[Industrial Democracy]], that is, for the government to own (&amp;quot;nationalize&amp;quot;) major industries such as coal mining, railways, steel making, shipbuilding, airlines, and banking. Small businesses remained private. The idea was that labor unions controlled the government and therefore unions controlled working conditions and wages for the benefit of workers, regardless of the damage to long-term economic growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Socialists were well organized and after 1918 they bitterly fought the breakaway faction that became the [[Communist]] movement. In recent years major Socialist parties (in Europe and Canada) have sometimes dropped the long-standing demands for state ownership of the means of production and have mostly accepted &amp;quot;Controlled Capitalism&amp;quot;. However, they remain tied to labor unions and favor liberal policies regarding high taxes and public spending. Conservatives have been negative toward the economics of the second form of socialism. Conservatives complain socialists use government power to redistribute wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within the [[European Union]], a form of [[democratic socialism]] was initially viewed as successful but eventually lead to lowered social equity and a downward spiraling economy, as well as general discontent. Although this acts as a drag on the economy, in democratic countries of the industrialized west, some socialist ideas have been put into practice with varying degrees of success. Beginning in 2010 many European countries were racked with rioting and social unrest as governments began to back away from out-of-control entitlements that began bankrupting them and lead to a world financial crisis because of unrestrained debt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791804575439732358241708.html WSJ; &amp;quot;Obstacle to Deficit Cutting: A Nation on Entitlements&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100929/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_europe_austerity_protests_10 Anti-austerity protests sweep across Europe]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.allbusiness.com/economy-economic-indicators/economic-policy-bailouts/14758032-1.html &amp;quot;Debt crisis pushes Europe toward economic reforms&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early 21st century, Socialism was becoming increasingly prominent in the West.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ozimek, Tom (November 9, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/socialism-stirs-again-30-years-after-collapse-of-berlin-wall_3141025.html Socialism Stirs Again 30 Years After Collapse of Berlin Wall]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved November 9, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Communal Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
The third form of Socialism has nothing to do with Marx or government ownership, and emphasizes the importance of the community over the individual.  Usually it means small communities sharing most of their possessions. The most famous examples are the religious [[Shakers]] of the 19th century (a conservative group), and the new-left communes that briefly existed in the 1960s and 70s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Early American settlers, as in Plymouth or Virginia, tried it but quickly abandoned it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Pilgrims in Plymouth used communal farming their first winter but then after a dismal harvest that first year, moved to a system where there was a more direct incentive other than guilt and honor. Governor Bradford summed it up in his journal:&lt;br /&gt;
:* &amp;quot;And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number, for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance) and ranged all boys and youth under some family. This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Not only were all hands more industrious—the incentive to harvest communal corn before it was fully ripe, a problem equivalent to poaching in the case of wildlife, was also eliminated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Robertsincentives.html Incentives Matter] - Russell Roberts - Library of Economics and Liberty&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Influence of Russia on socialism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Not until the birth of the [[Soviet Union]] after the [[Communist Revolution]] did the idea become generally accepted that socialism meant government seizing ownership of the economy.  Experience in 19th and 20th century [[France]], [[England]], and [[Germany]], however, made it clear that regulatory control by government bureaucrats is sufficient to implement socialism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ What is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Communism (the primary variant of socialism) the central goal is to establish a &amp;quot;[[workers' paradise]]&amp;quot;-an ideal state with perfect equality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In practice the socialist government owns the banks, railroads, farmlands, factories, and stores, and is the only employer, or at least controls the regulation of production and distribution.  The central goal is to destroy the &amp;quot;evils of capitalism&amp;quot; by government ownership or control of the means of production, usually with one party controlling the government on behalf of the working class. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist system never manages to establish this &amp;quot;paradise&amp;quot; because management for the benefit of the employees leads to featherbedding and lack of investment or economic growth, at the expense of consumers.  Collective farming (operating farms like factories) sharply reduced the food supply. The most thoroughgoing efforts by Communist regimes turned into authoritarian dictatorships. The government controls all investments, production, distribution, income, and prices, as well as all organizations, schools, news media and formerly private societies. Churches and labor unions are suppressed or controlled by the government. Socialism is the antithesis of [[capitalism]], because it opposes private ownership of capital or land, and rejects the free market in favor of central planning. It also rejects &amp;quot;civil society&amp;quot; and makes sure that all organizations are controlled by the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically, socialist regimes can have multiple parties. In practice there is only one political party, and it controls the government. The leaders of the party choose the government officials and set all policies for the nation and for cities and localities.  Opposition parties are not allowed access to the media or to meeting halls or to funding, and their leaders are often arrested as &amp;quot;enemies of the people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the redistribution of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the many over the rights of the few, but in practice when socialist economic principles are forced onto a nation by a totalitarian government a new Upper Class appears which is much better off than the Lower Class.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- Winston Churchill&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.quotesdaddy.com/quote/280995/winston-churchill/socialism-is-a-philosophy-of-failure-the-creed-of Churchill; Quotesdaddy.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism supposedly is an &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot; pursuit. Raisa Gorbachev, the wife of the last General Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], held a &amp;quot;PhD in Marxism-Leninism.&amp;quot;  Raisa Gorbachev died in a German hospital of [[leukemia]] because her beloved Soviet homeland was incapable of delivering proper healthcare, even for the elite of the Soviet Socialist Republic, after 70 years of socialism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===National Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|250px|right|One of the most well known political parties of the 20th century  was the [[National Socialist]] party of Germany headed by the [[evolution|evolutionary racist]] [[Adolf Hitler]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mises&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://mises.org/daily/1937&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;darNaz&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hott&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.hourofthetime.com/socialist.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ludwig von Mises Institute]] declares:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|The identification of [[Nazi]] [[Germany]] as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of [[Ludwig von Mises]]...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.}} Hitler found the notion of single-party control very attractive. That, and the idea of creating a &amp;quot;New man&amp;quot; in a godless socialist order, enlightened by science, victorious over their oppressors. Nazism was outlawed at the end of [[World War II]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Commonalities of Communism, Nazism and liberalism===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism|Fascism and the New Deal}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
!Communist Manifesto&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nazi]] Party Platform&lt;br /&gt;
!Analysis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The stripping away of land from private owners.  [[Liberalism]] today demands &amp;quot;eminent domain&amp;quot; on property.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand the nationalization of all trusts...profit-sharing in large industries...a generous increase in old-age pensions...by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor...and the creation of a national (folk) army.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The points raised in the [[Nazi]] platform demand an increase in taxes to support them.  Liberalism today demands heavy progressive and graduated income taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Abolition of all rights of inheritance.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|Liberalism today demands a &amp;quot;death tax&amp;quot; on anyone inheriting an estate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Nuremberg Laws of 1934 allowed Germany to take Jewish property.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand the nationalization of all trusts.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of the financial system.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press...editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens...Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State...the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of the press.  Liberals today demand control or suppression of talk radio and Fox News.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &amp;amp;c, &amp;amp;c.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of education, with an emphasis on doing things their way.  Liberals today are doing things ''their way'' in our schools.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Britain, the Labour Party and Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
At its inception, the [[Labour Party]] borrowed socialist ideas by committing itself to a program of nationalization under 'Clause 4' of their Constitution, but was always fundamentally committed to the British system of parliamentary government. Clause 4 was formally dropped after the election of [[Tony Blair]] as Party leader, signaling the creation of 'New' Labour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/21/newsid_2515000/2515825.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The British governments of 1945-1950 and 1950-1951 under [[Clement Attlee]] implemented the nationalization of several industries and utilities, including coal, steel, water, railways and electricity. Former owners of nationalized industries were compensated.  The best-known example is the nationalization of health care to create the [[National Health Service]] (NHS).  This made - literally overnight - health care &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; at the point of delivery for everybody in Britain, and it remains so today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1980s under Conservative Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] most of the nationalized industries were returned to the private sector, and public housing has been sold to the residents. These conservative decisions were endorsed by the &amp;quot;New Labour&amp;quot; of Tony Blair, to the annoyance of elderly radicals who fondly remember the poverty and inefficiencies of the old system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Obamunism ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Obamunism}}&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2010, [[American]] political consultant [[Dick Morris]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|When [[Obama]] took office, federal, state and local spending accounted for 30 percent of [[gross domestic product]]. Now it is up to 35 percent, and when health care is fully implemented, it will rise to above 40 percent. But taxes are still below 30 percent. The difference is the deficit, now grown to 10 percent of our GDP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If our government is to continue spending 40 percent of our GDP, we will morph into the European model of a socialist democracy. But if we can roll the spending back to 30 percent, while holding taxes level, we will retain our free market system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/columnists/DickMorrisandEileenMcGann/2010/04/24/the_silent_killer_obamas_vat_proposal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shepard-Fairey-imgs.JPG|right|thumb|250px|[[Shepard Fairey]], designer of the official Obama hope and change logo, is more known for his anti-American and pro-communist themes. Here a  [[Mao Zedong|Maoist]]  revolutionary is depicted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://images.google.com/images?um=1&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-ContextMenu&amp;amp;rlz=1I7ACAW_en___US352&amp;amp;tbs=isch:1&amp;amp;q=Shepard+Fairey&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;start=40&amp;amp;ndsp=20&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Anita Dunn]], the political strategist and former White House Communications Director, admitted that one of favorite political philosophers, one that she “turns to the most”, is [[Mao Zedong]], the [[communism|communist]] dictator responsible for the starvation, torture, and killing of 70 million Chinese.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/blog/2009/10/16/anita-dunn-favorite-philosopher-mao-tse-tung/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of the Obama administration have coined the word &amp;quot;[[Obamunism]]&amp;quot; to describe Barack Obama's socialistic and &amp;quot;[[fascism]] light&amp;quot; [[economic planning]] policies ([[Benito Mussolini]] defined fascism as the wedding of state and corporate powers.  Accordingly, trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] labels [[Obama administration corporate bailouts|Obama's corporate bailouts]] as being &amp;quot;fascism light&amp;quot; in nature).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/daily-intel/2009/07/20/obamunism-inc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.smallbusinessadvocate.com/small-business-interviews/gerald-celente-6944&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obamunism can also [[Allusion|allude]] to Obama's [[Obama administration fiscal policy|ruinous fiscal policies]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|reckless monetary policies]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://seekingalpha.com/article/120883-monetary-policynot-obama-s-stimulusis-what-needs-watching&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nypost.com/seven/05172009/postopinion/editorials/bams_wise_words_169731.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Stimulus====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Larry Summers]] was the Director of the White House's National Economic Council (NEC) for President Barack Obama. George Gerald Reisman, Professor Emeritus of Economics at [[Pepperdine University]] and author of ''Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics'', wrote that Summers' socialistic ideas on redistributing wealth demonstrate that [[Larry Summers]] is a &amp;quot;lightweight leftist&amp;quot; who &amp;quot;fails to understand the nature of the most essential feature of capitalism, namely, private ownership of the means of production and the indispensable role it plays in the standard of living of the average person.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;misesblog&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://blog.mises.org/archives/009031.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Reisman also wrote that Summers is a shallow and ignorant man whose knowledge of economics is minimal and whose evil views qualify him to be the economic advisor to [[Hugo Chavez]] of [[Venezuela]] or [[Robert Mugabe]] of [[Zimbabwe]], but do not qualify him to be an economic advisor to the President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;misesblog&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Land grab====&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2010, [[Hot Air]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The federal government, as the memo boasted, is the nation’s “largest land manager.” It already owns roughly [http://bigthink.com/ideas/21343 one of every three acres] in the United States. This is apparently not enough. At a “listening session” in New Hampshire last week, government bureaucrats trained their sights on millions of [http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9HGKEAG0.htm private forest land]  throughout the [[New England]] region. Agriculture Secretary [[Tom Vilsack]] crusaded for “the need for additional attention to the Land and Water Conservation Fund — and the need to promptly support full funding of that fund.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Property owners have every reason to be worried. The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is a pet project of green radicals, who want the decades-old government slush fund for buying up private lands to be freed from congressional appropriations oversight. It’s paid for primarily with receipts from the government’s offshore oil and gas leases. Both Senate and House Democrats have included $900 million in full LWCF funding, not subject to congressional approval, in their energy/BP oil spill legislative packages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/archives/2010/08/14/great-outdoors-initiative-a-federal-land-grab/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====You didn't build that====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{main|You didn't build that}}&lt;br /&gt;
On July 13, 2012, at a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Obama gave a speech that immediately stirred up controversy. Speaking about the government's role in the success of private business, he said:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/13/remarks-president-campaign-event-roanoke-virginia Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event in Roanoke, Virginia], White House&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help.  There was a great teacher somewhere in your life.  Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.  Somebody invested in roads and bridges.  If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that.  Somebody else made that happen.}} The [[Romney]] campaign has used &amp;quot;If you’ve got a business—you didn’t build that&amp;quot; in ads to show America that Obama believes it is government that creates business rather than hard-working individuals. The Obama campaign has alternatively stated that the sentenced was poorly worded since he was not giving a scripted speech and that when Obama said &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; he was referring to roads and bridges. Obama points to a later portion of his speech in which he said, &amp;quot;The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together,&amp;quot; to support his claim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Obamacare ''diktats''====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ObamaCareSymbol.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Image courtesy [[Newsbusters]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obamacare}}&lt;br /&gt;
The centerpiece of Obamacare was the [[individual mandate]] or ''[[diktat]]'', a provision that makes it mandatory for every citizen to purchase private health insurance, which was unprecedented in American history. There was no [[bi-partisan]] or national consensus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Epic [[Direct spending#New spending|new spending]] and taxes, pricier insurance, rationed care, dishonest accounting: The Pelosi health bill has it all. [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703399204574505423751140690.html Nancy Pelosi's New Health-Care Bill], ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'', November 01, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[President Obama]], Senate Majority Leader [[Harry Reid]] and House Speaker [[Nancy Pelosi]] rammed Obamacare down the throats of an unwilling American public. Half a year removed from the unprecedented legislative chicanery and backroom dealing that characterized the bill's passage, much more is known about the bill than when it was passed into law. [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Obamacare-is-even-worse-than-critics-thought-960772-103571664.html Examiner Editorial: Obamacare is even worse than critics thought], ''Washington Examiner'', September 22, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than 150 million Americans were completely locked out of the process.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Crabtree, S. (2009, October 20). &amp;quot;[https://thehill.com/homenews/house/63941-democrats-lock-republicans-out-of-committee-room Democrats Lock Republicans Out of Committee Room].&amp;quot; ''The Hill''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Pershing, B. (2009, October 23). &amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/22/AR2009102204442.html Democrats on House Committee Lock Out Republicans].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Freeman, J. (2009, October 20). &amp;quot;House Democrats Lock GOP Out of Committee Room.&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(2009, October 21). &amp;quot;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/21/oversight-panels-democrats-lock-republicans-dispute/ Oversight Panel's Democrats Lock Out Republicans After Dispute].&amp;quot; ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's progressive Democratic Socialists had single party control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davis, S. (2009, April 28). &amp;quot;[https://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/04/28/sen-specter-to-switch-parties-democrats-near-60-vote-majority/ Sen. Specter To Switch Parties, Democrats Near 60 Vote Majority].&amp;quot; Washington Wire. ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;keithmsnbcer (2009, April 29). &amp;quot;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGYBbFMeFNc Bernie Sanders on Ed Show].&amp;quot; ''MSNBC''. YouTube.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Censorship of journalists====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obamagate timeline 2009-2014 vanguardism}}&lt;br /&gt;
On May 13, 2013 the [[Associated Press]] announced telephone records for 20 of their reporters had been [[subpoena]]ed by the Justice Department. The Justice Dept. subpoenaed the phone records of AP from [[Verizon]] and other service providers.&amp;lt;ref name=verizonslate&amp;gt;{{cite web|last=Gallagher|first=Ryan|title=Verizon Wireless Secretly Passed AP Reporters' Phone Records to Feds|publisher=www.slate.com|date=May 16, 2013|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/05/16/verizon_wireless_passed_ap_reporters_phone_records_to_the_feds.html|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The AP claimed these acts were a &amp;quot;massive and unprecedented intrusion&amp;quot; into news-gathering.&amp;lt;ref name=TTSanchez&amp;gt;{{cite web|last=Sanchez|first=Raf|title=US Justice Department secretly seizes Associated Press phone records|publisher=The Telegraph|date=May 13, 2013|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/10055318/US-Justice-Department-secretly-seizes-Associated-Press-phone-records.html|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=TG130513&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Washington (AP)|title=US government secretly obtained Associated Press phone records|publisher=The Guardian|date=May 13, 2013|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/13/america-government-associated-press-phone-records|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; CEO Gary Pruitt of AP stated: &amp;quot;These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP's newsgathering operations and disclose information about AP's activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=CNNJohns&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Matt Smith and Joe Johns|title=AP blasts feds for phone records search|publisher=CNN|date=May 14, 2013|url=https://www.cnn.com/2013/05/13/us/justice-ap-phones/?hpt=hp_t2|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=holder&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Gary B. Pruitt|title=AP letter to Eric Holder on seizure of phone records|publisher=USA Today|date=May 13, 2013|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/05/13/doj-seizes-ap-phone-records/2156819/|accessdate=June 1, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few years earlier, Attn. Gen. [[Eric Holder]] renewed a subpoena of James Risen, a reporter for the ''[[New York Times]]''. Risen and a colleague reported on warrantless wiretaps. The coverage won Risen and colleague a [[Pulitzer Prize]] for “carefully sourced stories on secret domestic eavesdropping that stirred a national debate.” The Justice Dept. [[John Brennan]], an avowed communist, played a key role in the illegal wiretap program, overseeing the production of what personnel in the program called the “scary memos” intended to justify domestic spying exposed by Risen. Brennan later admitted that he relied on information from CIA's torture program rather than domestic spying, which was used as a cover.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2013 [[Comey]]'s [[FBI]] opened a case on [[CBS News]] anchor [[Sharyl Attkisson]] under the auspices of '[[national security]].' Attkisson reported news embarrassing to Eric Holder on [[Operation Fast and Furious]] and extensively on the [[Benghazi massacre]] coverup.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wyden.senate.gov&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.wyden.senate.gov/download/?id=285dc9e7-195a-4467-b0fe-caa857fc4e0d&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Police state surveillance of opponents====&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also : [[Obamagate timeline 2015 progressive police state]] and [[Obamagate timeline|Obamagate timeline 2016 election year]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contradictory Goals of Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism's stated purpose is to eliminate the huge gap between the highest and lowest classes of society. Their bitter complaint has been that the upper class exploits its dominance to gain privileges and wealth, while the lower class must suffer tyranny and poverty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;all socialists agree that a socialist economy must be run for the benefit of the vast majority of the people rather than for a small aristocratic, plutocratic, or capitalist class.&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_an_economic_system]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This obsession with class paradoxically creates a group of people with a vested interest in seeing class differences remain (socialist politicians, [[community organizer]]s, ''etc.''); if by some means the class system actually ''were'' destroyed, these people would be out of a job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another essential goal of most socialist thinkers has been to eliminate [[Capitalism]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;... one of the fundamental goals of the socialist movement throughout history has been the abolition of capitalism&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_opposition_and_criticisms_of_socialism_arguments_for_and_against A Wisdom Archive on Socialism - Opposition and criticisms of socialism; arguments for and against]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
on the grounds that only &amp;quot;social control&amp;quot; of the economy can prevent abuses such as [[feudalism]], [[monopoly]], [[cartel]]s, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But experiments on both a moderate and a grand scale have shown that socialism's main purpose has been undermined by its unremitting opposition to [[free market]] economics. In its drive to eliminate capitalism, it has overlooked the fact that general prosperity is vouchsafed by [[economic freedom]], and that free market economics improves the lot of the poor much more quickly and permanently than any system of central economic control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real aim of socialists is probably personal: why else would socialists want to create programs which encourage Dependency? Well, it fits into their lust for power. &lt;br /&gt;
People who want to control others need people who are willing to be controlled.&lt;br /&gt;
Independent, proactive people do not fit into the socialist Power Model. That is why the first thing [[Karl Marx|Marx]] wanted to remove from the economy was the [[Profit]] Motive: it gives people an incentive to make their own decisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key elements==&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the expropriation of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the nomenklatura over the rights of workers and earners.  Many of the most notoriously oppressive dictatorships have been socialist, such as the [[Soviet Union]] and China under Mao Zedong. Private wealth was seized and the owners executed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic theory===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Atheism|atheist]] [[Karl Marx]] is sometimes referred to as the father of socialism. Economist Thomas Sowell observed:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The Marxian contribution to economics can be readily summarized as virtually zero. Professional economics as it exists today reflects no indication that Karl Marx ever existed... [T]he development of modern economics has simply ignored Marx. Even economists who are Marxists typically utilize a set of analytical tools to which Marx contributed nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thomas Sowell, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=TVkVAAAAIAAJ Marxism: Philosophy and Economics]'' (Taylor &amp;amp; Francis, 1985) ISBN 0043201717, p. 217.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the individual is subordinate to the collective, the use of [[democide]], or &amp;quot;death by government,&amp;quot; is another feature of socialism in the final stage of bringing about a single party, anti-democratic totalitarian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Welfare state===&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, democratic socialism calls for equalization of incomes, through taxation of private wealth coupled with welfare state spending. The [[nationalization]] of major industries is primarily a device to allow the unionized workers to control their own wages and working conditions, cutting out the capitalistic owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State [[pension]]s and unemployment insurance were not brought in by Socialists—they were first introduced by arch-conservative Chancellor [[Bismarck]] in Germany in the 1870s. In Britain they were introduced about 1910 by [[Winston Churchill]] and [[David Lloyd George]] of the [[Liberal Party]], and in the U.S. were part of Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt's [[New Deal]] in the 1930s.  Welfare state ideas such as [[universal health care]], and state control of key industries have been common throughout the developed world in the modern era. However, the United States has always rejected socialism as an ideological position, with a few exceptions such as the [[TVA]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===So-called &amp;quot;mixed economies&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Social democracy|Mixed economy}}&lt;br /&gt;
Social democracies and Mixed economies are socialism by [[incrementalism]]. Often socialism is a matter of degree and numerous economies in the world are very socialistic such as [[Europe]]an countries (many of which are facing financial difficulties due to over taxation and excessive spending).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/05/european_socialism_is_bleeding.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The single party has yet to gain full control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because many businesses still are privately owned, [[ipso facto]], the [[United States]] is not a socialistic government. &amp;quot;That definition is confuted by the earliest theoretical writings on socialism.  In France, Henri de Saint-Simon, in the first decades of the 1800s, and his pupil and colleague [[Auguste Comte]], in the 1820s and 30s, along with [[Robert Owen]] contemporaneously in England, ''stated that the essential feature of what Owen called socialism is government regulation of the means of production and distribution.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ Thomas E. Brewton; Once Again: What Is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
When the government controls the volume of money and its economic applications, it has the economy in a stranglehold.  When government controls education so that nothing other than secular socialism may be taught, as Saint-Simon advocated, it controls the future destiny of a nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
Some forms of socialism have often been [[atheism|atheistic]] in character, and many leading socialists (most prominently Karl Marx) have been critical of the role of religion - and conservative religion in particular - which they criticize for lending support to an unjust social order. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Socialists have been Christians, and there has been considerable interplay between Christian and Socialist ideas. [[Christian socialists]] have asserted that early Christian communities, in particular, displayed certain traits, such as the holding of possessions in common,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:44: &amp;quot;Everyone was filled with awe, and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the rejection of conventional sexual mores and gender roles, the provision for communal education, etc., that could be considered similar to socialism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the chaos sparked by the advent of the Reformation in Europe, several sects with radical new interpretations of Christianity sprung up, many of them Anabaptists (believers in adult baptism). Under the leadership of the reformer Thomas Muntzer the peasants of south-west Germany rose up in arms against the clergy and nobility, establishing anarcho-communes in their wake. Though they were massacred to a man, ten years later a group of radical Anabaptists under the leadership of Jan Matthys seized control of the north-western Germany city of Munster from the Prince-Archbishop there and established a Christian-Communist state. True to the spirit of applied communism, Mathys took twelve wives, held lavish feasts for himself and his most loyal followers and had himself crowned King of the World as the city starved, besieged by an alliance of Protestant and Catholic forces keen to see them exterminated. Mathys and all his followers were all tortured and killed when the Prince-Archbishop returned with professional troops to sack the city and reassert his authority, effectively wiping out all non-pacifistic Anabaptists in north-western Germany. Only Baptists as we know them today survived the following persecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See, for instance,  Arnold Toynbee, the British historian, has responded to this,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Marxian excerpt from a Christian Socialism is an experiment which is doomed to failure because it has denied itself the aid of the spiritual power which alone is capable of making Socialism a success. ….'Christianity', they say, 'is the opiate of the People'; and, in the [[Soviet Union]]… Christianity or of any other theistic religion have been debarred… from admission to membership of the All-Union Communist Party. In fact, Communism has been definitely and militantly anti-Christian. Thus the campaign against Christianity which is to-day an integral part of the propaganda of [[Marxian Socialism]] is a challenge to the living generation of Christians …we latter-day Christians may still turn a Marxian attack upon Christianity to good account … a re-awakening of the Christian social conscience has been the one great positive practical achievement of Karl Marx&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'', Annex II to Vol. V, Part C (i) (c) 2, p. 585-586, Marxism, Socialism, and Christianity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Alleged New Testament socialism in a godless utopia====&lt;br /&gt;
Socialist claim the earliest Christians were decidedly living in a manner consistent with basic aims of socialism, albeit with critical requirements and distinctions from its secularist expressions. Luke 14:33 requires the forsaking of all one has if one will be a disciple of Christ, and while this is not shown to necessarily always require the literally forsaking of all,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Acts 2:44 states that the communal believers &amp;quot;had all things common&amp;quot;. Acts 4:32-5:11 also describes community redistribution of property, and details the Divine punishment of a husband and wife for hypocrisy, in keeping proceeds from the sale of a piece of property while openly pretending that they gave it all, as others  voluntarily did.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible, (5:1-11)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, forsaking all is shown to be that of first surrendering oneself and life to the God of the Bible, and placing all at His disposal,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry (1662 - 1714), ''Commentary on the Whole Bible'', Lk. 14:25-35&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Archibald Thomas Robertson, ''WORD PICTURES IN THE NEW TESTAMENT'', Lk. 14:33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with literal giving as a result being as He directs, and voluntary. (2Cor. 8,9) &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all things, may abound to every good work: (2 Corinthians 9:7-8)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the early organic community provides a noble model of communal life, and of a &amp;quot;seminary&amp;quot; type experience, it was also soon dispersed by persecution (thus greatly expanding the church: Acts 8:1-5; 11:19), and it is later indicated that believers retained ownership of property after conversion. (Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13) Rich Christians are evidenced to have been part of the early church, but were not mandated by the church itself to give all they had away, but to be lowly in mind, and to be ready and willing to distribute, in faith and surrender to God. (1Tim. 6:17-19) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, in both Testaments capitalism is clearly supported,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gary North, ''Capitalism and the Bible''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  and indolence is not subsidized, but penalized by poverty, while diligence in work is rewarded by its fruits. (Prov. 6:6-11; 13:4; 20:4; 2 Thes. 3:10-12; 1 Tim. 5:17-18) Although holy widows over 60 years old who were without familial support were taken in by the church, a man is clearly required to provide for his own family, if able. (1Tim. 5:2ff) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
While the success of the early church as an organic community is often invoked in support of modern socialism, and many communes of the 1960s evoked the Bible, the early organic church was a result of the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit among believers, while the &amp;quot;administrators&amp;quot; were humble servants who were examples of self-sacrifice, and who worked with their own hands as needed, (1Cor. 4:9-16) and whose authority was established by manifest Divine attestation, including the pro-active exercise of church discipline being only by supernatural or otherwise spiritual means, not carnal force.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:43; 5:5,9,10; 1Cor. 4:19-21; 2Cor. 13:2,3; 2Thes. 3:14,15; 2Tim. 4:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, other distinctions, without the unique changes and influence resulting from faith and full surrender to Christ from all the community, and His anointing upon the work, attempts to mimic the communal life of Christians have failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As one critic of modern-day  socialism states: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Socialism, unfortunately, completely disregards Biblical teaching about the fallen nature of human beings and assumes that human beings will act in a morally upright fashion if their basic needs are met. This is at the heart of why socialistic systems never work: because human nature does not work in this fashion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/06/capitalism-and-socialism-in-light-of-the-bible Bob Ellis, ''Capitalism and Socialism in Light of the Bible''] Dakota Voice, June 23rd, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Atheism and socialism ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton|Acton]] Institute states concerning [[atheism and socialism]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|...a growing body of research reveals that as the welfare state grows, the church shrinks. Adam Kay of Duke University discovered that church and state have a “[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ed70/6904ff2959ec495fb0816dcbf2c19b967fdd.pdf hydraulic relationship]”: Events “that lower [[faith]] in one of these external systems (e.g., the government) lead to subsequent increases in faith in the other (e.g., [[God]]).” Another study found that increased welfare spending “in a specific year predicted lower religiosity one to two years later.” It [https://blog.acton.org/archives/101251-gods-power-can-be-outsourced-to-the-government-study.html concluded], “The power and order emanating from God can be outsourced to the government.”...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...faith in the transcendent gets crowded out by faith in [[socialism]]’s [[utopia]]n promise of equality-of-outcome on earth. This path transformed Michael Harrington from a daily communicant volunteering in the Catholic Worker movement to the [[atheism|atheistic]] founder of the Democratic Socialists of America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.eurasiareview.com/21122019-how-socialism-causes-atheism-oped/ How Socialism Causes Atheism – OpEd]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
''This section confuses &amp;quot;interpretation&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ideology of '''Socialism''' is subject to a variety of interpretations. From a conservative perspective, Marxist socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production are seized and monopolized by the government sometimes without compensation to the builders of the [[capital]]. Investments, production, distribution, income, prices, and economic justice are administered by a government [[nomenklatura]] that regulates the transfer of money, goods (including capital goods), and services primarily through taxation, regulation and aggressive institutionalized coercion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some socialists reject this description. Democratic socialists advocate a system of governance based on the principles of [[solidarity]], [[equality]] and [[liberty]], viewing these principles as interconnected. They believe increased socio-economic equality is associated with increased practical freedom to fulfill human potential. In many countries, such as Britain, socialist movements have been built on Christian, democratic and co-operative bases, embracing the notion that individuals should 'treat others as they would wish to be treated', and arguing that all individuals have a moral responsibility for the welfare of other members of their society. Socialism seeks to prioritize human welfare over other goals, such as profit and wealth accumulation by elites; it views increased redistribution of wealth as vital to securing greater freedom and happiness for the bulk of the people. Though this rosy picture of socialism is appealing to many, it ignores what Hayek called &amp;quot;[[the road to serfdom]].&amp;quot;  Though in theory socialism is an idealized, egalitarian form of economics, in practice it means rule by labor bosses who minimize individualism and economic growth in the name of equality and benefits for the working class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Karl Marx]] considered socialism to be a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. In his view, socialism is summed up by the expression: &amp;quot;From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.&amp;quot; A major criticism of socialism is that it infringes individual rights in favor of the populace. In a very real sense, politics in the Western World throughout the 20th century was shaped by the conflict between socialist and capitalist governmental policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although socialist parties are common in Europe, the leading examples all currently embrace some free enterprise, individual property rights and certain other aspects of capitalism although leading European Socialists are very critical of America. In many European countries, socialism has been changing to [[Social democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Hayek]] and [[Ludwig von Mises]] were important critics of socialism, particularly regarding what is known as the Socialist Calculation Debate.  Hayek and Mises argued that a socialist economy would face information constraints that would prevent even well-intentioned planners from efficiently allocating resources.  That is, the planners would not know how much a battleship or a hospital cost, and could not efficiently allocate resources among different choices.  This criticism should be considered as compatible with, but independent of, criticisms based on [[Public choice theory]] that bring into consideration the incentives of political actors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Svetlana Kunin, who lived in the Soviet Union until 1980 explains how the system worked: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Life in the USSR modeled the socialist ideal. God-based religion was suppressed and replaced with cultlike adoration for political figures....Only the ruling class of communist leaders had access to special stores, medicine and accommodations that could compare to those in the West. The rest of the citizenry had to deal with permanent shortages of food and other necessities, and had access to free but inferior, unsanitary and low-tech medical care.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
USSR, 1959: I am a &amp;quot;young pioneer&amp;quot; in school. History classes remind us that there is a higher authority than their parents and teachers: the leaders of the Communist Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Those who left Russia found a different set of values in America: freedom of religion, speech, individual pursuits, the right to private property and free enterprise....These opportunities let the average immigrant live a better life than many elites in the Soviet Communist Party...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The slogans of &amp;quot;fairness and equality&amp;quot; sound better than the slogans of capitalism. But unlike at the beginning of the 20th century, when these slogans and ideas were yet to be tested, we have accumulated history and reality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/SpecialReport.aspx?id=512665 ''The Perspective Of A Russian Immigrant''], ''Investors Business Daily,'' 09/10/2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A government which adheres to economic socialistic principles also tends to have cultures which prize unmerited equality among citizen and criminal alike, and through extension of socialistic welfare policies, between the chronically employed and the chronically unemployed, by ensuring both groups receive income though only one group works for income. This enables people otherwise healthy to not seek gainful employment because they will receive income no matter their actions, thus providing no incentive to produce. The economies of socialistic governments are thus weak and riddled with flaws, such as expecting increased production from a reduced workforce, and when engendered with a progressive culture, which simply means people who do are the same as people who do not, eventually fall under the weight of their own poorly managed and over-extended public welfare institutions. Public welfare also decreases personal charity, thus making the people dependent on the aid of the government since charitable aid, such as from a church, is discouraged by the secular nature of socialistic nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialists occasionally appeal to the fact that God, in the Old Testament, commanded His own nation to surrender a tenth of its proceeds for the maintenance of the priests and for the care of the sickly and weak. But, while fallen men, and their secular and pagan nations, shall always struggle to understand the righteous balances between government and liberty.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;npr&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.npr.org/2011/08/23/139761274/how-the-a-p-changed-the-way-we-shop ''The Great A&amp;amp;P and the Struggle for Small Business in America''], &amp;quot;NPR’s interview of the book’s author, Marc Levinson&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (i.e., between local and national logistics, as well as between the logistics of the individual person and those of his community) the mark of socialism is the general allowance for a naive, and willingly ignorant, adult sub-population whose members prefer, despite the limitations imposed by bureaucratic accountability, to live under all the securities rightly afforded in the fallen world only to infants. In the unfallen world, such security was a given for all persons, but without any of the bureaucracy required in the fallen world for maintaining it. In the fallen world, such security is an unattainable ideal, so that the more is done to attain it, the more the society suffers under the requisite bureaucracy. And, while the initial policy made toward that ideal is the creation of an executive class or executive vocation, such as monarchies and professional armies,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=1Sa&amp;amp;c=8&amp;amp;t=KJV#19 ''First Samuel 8:19-20''] Blue Letter Bible&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wbur.org/media-player?url=http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2011/09/29/consequences-combat-vietnam&amp;amp;title=The+Consequences+Of+Combat&amp;amp;segment=consequences-combat-vietnam&amp;amp;pubdate=2011-09-29&amp;amp;source=hereandnow ''Interview of Vietnam war veteran, and '''What It Is Like To Go To War''' author, Karl Marlantes, on NPR's Here And Now'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there is a 'tipping point' in the creation of bureaucratic entities beyond which any civilization cannot help but increasingly lose its footing in the struggle to balance all its righteous human interests. The result is an ever-increasing proportion of that civilization's total population which, for all variety of reasons, becomes enslaved to their own demands for that ideal of security. When there is no judge who judges righteously, when all the people make the laws, and when the power of money is used to try to stay ahead of the natural consequences of unrighteousness, the 'bad money' cannot help but drive out the 'good money', until the 'Bank of Reality' is forced to call in the loan, and the civilization implodes to the point that it falls victim also to militant invaders and, or, to unmanageable internal unrest.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;npr&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Past Socialist Countries==&lt;br /&gt;
===Chile===&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist socialist leader [[Salvador Allende]] was elected in Chile in 1970 in a minority government run by the Popular Unity Party. Allende's economic policy, known as the Vuskovic Plan, sought to achieve transition to socialism. The Vuskovic Plan involved nationalization of large foreign enterprises, land redistribution to farmers, and redistribution of income. The majority in Parliament never supported it and the plan was never carried out as Allende was overthrown by the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Socialist Countries (Current)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Cuba]]===&lt;br /&gt;
Communist leader [[Fidel Castro]] violently overthrew the Cuban government in the 1950s and has declared Cuba to be communist since then, nationalizing millions of dollars worth of American-owned property. It is notable that Fidel Castro originally self-defined as [[liberal]], before coming out openly as a communist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;esrc=s&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;cd=5&amp;amp;ved=0CGoQFjAE&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fib-global-history-ii-period-5.aspen.high.schoolfusion.us%2Fmodules%2Flocker%2Ffiles%2Fget_group_file.phtml%3Ffid%3D6868636%26gid%3D1176955%26sessionid%3D0&amp;amp;ei=o74IUPDNOqPp6wGbtPGxCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1bEoHrxurCF_WL1OPKMxIb4hCTw Fidel Castro - His Rise and Rule of Cuba]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today, Cuba faces copious economic problems and the people lack their fundamental rights. (Fidel's brother [[Raul Castro]] now runs the country, having taken it over from his ailing brother Fidel.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[North Korea]]'s form of communism is in the form of &amp;quot;Juche&amp;quot; - a doctrine established by [[Kim Il Sung]] and carried on by his son [[Kim Jong Il]] and after his death by the current leader [[Kim Jong-un]]. Although it is investing heavily in nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, extreme poverty on the verge of starvation is the fate of the people, who are very tightly controlled. The country has little to no electrical power at night outside the capital, which can be verified by looking at nighttime satellite photos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epod.usra.edu/archive/epodviewer.php3?oid=87488&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Venezuela===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Venezuelan-Garbage-Truck-640x480 (2).jpg|right|250px|thumb|[[Venezuela]]ns eating &amp;quot;Bernie Burgers&amp;quot; out of a garbage truck.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mediaite.com/online/video-of-venezuelans-eating-out-of-a-garbage-truck-led-maduro-to-walk-out-of-jorge-ramos-interview/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist policies of president-for-life Hugo Chavez have destroyed the economy of that oil-rich nation. In 2009, he seized the Venezuelan operations of U.S. based Cargill in order to tighten his grip on the shrinking food supply in his country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/venezuela/4938993/Venezuelas-Hugo-Chavez-tightens-state-control-of-food-amid-rocketing-inflation-and-food-shortages.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the death of Chavez, [[Nicolás Maduro]] continues his policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Countires===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Ortega]], the dictator of [[Nicaragua]], is a strong ally of Venezuela and Cuba. [[China]] and [[Vietnam]] have abolished the Socialist economy but are still governed by Communist parties. Other countries who are controlled by Socialist parties are [[Laos]], [[Angola]], [[Mozambique]] and [[Moldova]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes on Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
Comparative quotes are given from the top [[Left-wing]] - [[Socialist]] - [[National Socialist]] (a.k.a. [[Nazi]]) - [[Marxist]] - [[Communist]] leaders and their critics in order to better understand the commonality of the end result of their similar philosophy taken to its fruition by the [[big government]] [[welfare state]]-[[nanny state]]-[[police state]] by [[leftist]] [[globalist]]-[[statist]]-socialist-communists. For more examples, see [[Nazism and socialism]]. From these quotes one can see little difference between Socialists, Nazis, Communists, Marxists. Communist regimes killed 60 million in the 20th century through [[genocide]], according to [[Le Monde]] and more than 100 million people according to ''The Black Book of Communism''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from National Socialist's Adolph Hitler===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Then will come a [[National Socialism|National Socialist]] State tribunal; then will November, 1918, be expiated; then the [[mass murder|heads will roll]].&lt;br /&gt;
** testimony at a trial of German officers, Leipzig, in 1930.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We have to put a stop to the idea that it is a part of everybody's [[unalienable rights|civil rights]] to [[freedom of speech|say whatever he pleases]].&lt;br /&gt;
** transcript of a conversation (22 February 1942)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;National socialism is the determination to create a [[slave|new man]]. There will no longer exist any individual arbitrary [[free will|will]], nor realms in which the individual belongs to himself. The time of happiness as a private matter is over.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted in Joachim C. Fest (1974), ''Hitler''. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, p.&amp;amp;nbsp;533.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I have sympathy for Mr. [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt|Roosevelt]], because he marches straight toward his objectives over Congress, lobbies and bureaucracy.&amp;quot; Hitler went on to note that he was the sole leader in Europe who expressed &amp;quot;understanding of the methods and motives of President Roosevelt.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.fff.org/freedom/0795a.asp] ''New York Times'' 1934, quoted from John Toland: ''Adolf Hitler: The Definitive Biography''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quotes from National Socialist's Heinrich Himmler ===&lt;br /&gt;
From the Nazi party ([[National Socialism]]) [[SS]] leader [[Heinrich Himmler]]:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;In the course of history periods of capitalism and socialism alternate with one another; capitalism is the unnatural, socialism the natural [[economic system]]...The [[Nazi|National Socialists]] and the [[Communists|Red Front]] have the same aspirations. The [[Jew]]s falsified the Revolution in the form of [[Marxism]] and that failed to bring fulfillment.&amp;quot;—Speech in [[Potsdam]] (13 October 1926), quoted in Peter Longerich, Heinrich Himmler (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;92–93.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The best political weapon is the [[terrorism|weapon of terror]]. Cruelty commands respect. Men may hate us. But, we don't ask for their love; only for their fear.&amp;quot;—Quoted in &amp;quot;Visions of Reality - A Study of Abnormal Perception and Behavior&amp;quot; - by Alberto Rivas - Psychology - 2007 - Page 162&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quotes from Lenin ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Vladimir Lenin]] stated:&lt;br /&gt;
* “The way to crush the [[middle class]] is to grind them between the millstones of [[taxation]] and [[inflation]].”&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The best revolutionary is youth devoid of [[moral]]s.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;A lie told often enough becomes the truth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The goal of socialism is communism.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;There are no morals in [[politics]] there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Give us the child for 8 years and it will be a [[Bolshevik]] forever.&amp;quot; (see [[Public school values]] and [[Professor values]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Stalin===&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Darwin-Stalin connection'' describes the brutal [[Soviet]] dictator [[Josef Stalin]] who [[mass murder|murdered millions]] of people, giving credit to [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]]'s book for his outlook in life:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The death of one man is a tragedy, the [[mass murder|death of millions]] is a statistic.&amp;quot; ~ to [[Churchill]], 1945.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Death is the solution to all problems. No man - no problem&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Ideas are more powerful than [[guns]]. We would [[gun control|not let our enemies have guns]], why should we let them have ideas?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;It is enough that the people know there was an [[election]]. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The only real power comes out of a long [[rifle]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;When we hang the [[capitalist]]s they will sell us the rope we use.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Leon Trotsky===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Repression for the attainment of economic ends is a necessary weapon of the socialist [[dictatorship]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leon Trotsky]] in ''Terrorism and Communism : A Reply to Karl Kautsky'' (1920; 1975), p.&amp;amp;nbsp;153&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The road to socialism lies through a period of the highest possible intensification of the principle of the state … Just as a lamp, before going out, shoots up in a brilliant flame, so the state, before disappearing, assumes the form of the dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e., the most ruthless form of state, which embraces the life of the citizens authoritatively in every direction...&lt;br /&gt;
** ''Terrorism and Communism : A Reply to Karl Kautsky'' (1920; 1975), p. 177&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Leon Trotsky in his book The [[Russian Revolution]], 1930&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Root out the counterrevolutionaries without mercy, lock up suspicious characters in concentration camps... Shirkers will be [[extermination camp|shot]], regardless of past service.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Statement of 1918, as quoted in ''Trotsky : The Eternal Revolutionary'' (1996) by Dmitri Volkogonov, p.&amp;amp;nbsp;213&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Mao===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mao Zedong]], responsible for the deaths of 77 million [[Chinese]] states:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Every Communist must grasp the truth: Political power grows out of the barrel of a [[gun]].&amp;quot;—The [[Little Red Book]], 1964&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Our principle is that the [[Communist Party|Party]] commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes on Kim Il-sung===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Kim Il-sung]] took the communist [[cult of personality]] to a new level.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barbara Demick (2010) ''Nothing to Envy: Real Lives in North Korea'', Granta, page 45, ISBN 9781847081414&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In Korea, the Americans have far exceed the Hitlerites!&amp;quot;—by Kim Il-sung&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;**Kim Il-sung to the [[Swedish]] communist leader [[Frank Baude]] in 1993.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;When it comes to the orchestration of terror, Kim Jong-il is a natural born genius.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Kim Duk Hong]] quoted in ''[[BBC News]]'' (21 July 2003) &amp;quot;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent/3065101.stm Inside the mind of Kim Jong-il]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Pol Pot===&lt;br /&gt;
As ruler of [[Cambodia]] Pol Pot was responsible for [[mass murder|exterminating]] 2 million people by [[genocide]]. That's a quarter of the country's population:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Exterminate the 50 million [[Vietnamese]]... and purify the masses of the [[Cambodian]] people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Phnom Penh radio broadcast by [[Pol Pot]] of the [[Khmer Rouge]] (May 10, 1978) ([http://www.enotes.com/genocide-encyclopedia/khmer-rouge])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Related Quotes from Others===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[[Socialist]]s ignore the side of man that is of the spirit.  They can provide shelter, fill your belly with bacon and beans, treat you when you are ill, all the things that are guaranteed to a prisoner or a slave.  They don't understand that we dream - yes, even of some time owning a yacht.&amp;quot; -- [[President]] [[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9ut8fnmwVkwC&amp;amp;pg=PA91#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false|last1=Skinner|first1=Kiron K.|last2=Anderson|first2=Annelise A.|title=Stories in His Own Hand: The Everyday Wisdom of Ronald Reagan ; Edited with an Introduction and Commentary by Kiron K. Skinner, Annelise Anderson, Martin Anderson ; Foreword by George P. Shultz|date=2001|publisher=Simon and Schuster|isbn=9781416584506}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the [[income redistribution|equal sharing]] of misery.&amp;quot; -- [[Winston Churchill]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I've always doubted that the socialists had a leg to stand on intellectually&amp;quot; -- [[Friedrich Hayek]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The trouble is with socialism, which resembles a form of [[mental illness]] more than it does a philosophy&amp;quot; -- [[L. Neil Smith]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Socialists cry &amp;quot;Power to the people&amp;quot;, and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean — [[Nanny state|power over people]], [[Police state|power to the State]].&amp;quot; -- [[Margaret Thatcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;All socialism involves [[slavery]]&amp;quot; -- [[Herbert Spencer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Wonderful system, wrong species&amp;quot;—Edward O. Wilson; who believed that collectivism was better suited to an ant than a human.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/homo-consumericus/201101/communismsocialism-great-idea-wrong-species-e-o-wilson Communism/Socialism: “Great Idea. Wrong Species.” (E. O. Wilson)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to ''consolidate'' and ''control'' the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all.&amp;quot;—Gary Allen &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=UuKnhw27vUwC&amp;amp;q=%22if+one+understands+that+socialism+is+not+a%22&amp;amp;dq=%22if+one+understands+that+socialism+is+not+a%22&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0CDEQ6AEwBGoVChMI9b6puNfryAIVxSQmCh2CHw7j None Dare Call It Conspiracy], page 33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We face a hostile ideology; (Socialism i) global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose and insidous in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully there is call for not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of questions but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain despite every provocation on our charted course towards permanent peace and human betterment.&amp;quot; - Dwight D. Eisenhower, Farewell Address&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Big government]] [[Welfare state]] leads to [[socialist]] [[Nanny state]], leads to [[communist]] [[Police state]] - Don't think Socialism-Communism is incompatible with [[Islam]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control]] - key element to create a police state&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of atheist and agnostic pseudosciences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dictatorship]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dictatorship of the proletariat]]: [[Class warfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[List of Socialist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Single-party state]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mobocracy]], [[Social Effects of the Theory of Evolution]], [[Anti-Semitism]], [[Communist Racism]], [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nazi Party|National Socialist German Workers' Party]] (Nazi Party)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nazism and socialism]]: [[National Socialism]] - the Nazis were elitist [[Police state]] [[liberals]] not [[conservative]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Left-wing Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Resisting Socialist Landfills‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Champagne socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33169-socialism-explained Socialism Explained], by Charles Scaliger of ''The New American''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/etexts/hayekintellectuals.pdf The Intellectuals and Socialism], By F.A. Hayek, ''The University of Chicago Law Review'', (Spring 1949), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;417–420, 421-423, 425-433. &lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109587/socialism Socialism] Encyclopædia Britannica.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/socialism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Socialism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/socialism-Christian.html How should a Christian view socialism?], by [[GotQuestions]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/socialism-poverty-democrats-standard-of-living/ You Can See America's Future Under Socialism, And It Isn't Pretty], ''Investor's Business Daily'', October 25, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tomroganthinks.com/2017/11/socialism-sucks.html?m=1 Socialism isn't good for you], Tom Rogan, November 23, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-eight-politics-how-the-devil-sows-chaos-part-i_2592414.html Chapter Eight: How Communism Sows Chaos in Politics (Part I)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-eight-politics-how-communism-sows-chaos-part-ii_2594599.html Chapter Eight: How Communism Sows Chaos in Politics (Part II)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-nine-the-communist-economic-trap-part-i_2596547.html Chapter Nine: The Communist Economic Trap (Part I)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-nine-the-communist-economic-trap-part-ii_2605465.html Chapter Nine: The Communist Economic Trap (Part II)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Busky, Donald F. ''Communism in History and Theory: From Utopian Socialism to the Fall of the Soviet Union'' (2002) [https://www.amazon.com/Communism-History-Theory-Utopian-Socialism/dp/027597748X/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-24 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dougherty, Jude P. &amp;quot;Socialist Man: A Psychological Profile,&amp;quot; ''Modern Age'' Volume 46, Number 1-2; Winter/Spring 2004 [http://www.mmisi.org/ma/46_1-2/dougherty.pdf online edition], a conservative critique&lt;br /&gt;
*Laslett, John, ed. ''Failure of a Dream: Essays in the History of American Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lindemann, Albert S. ''A History of European Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Gary Marks. ''It Didn't Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States'' (2001), Lipset was a leading conservative scholar [https://www.amazon.com/Didnt-Happen-Here-Socialism-Failed/dp/0393322548/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Malia, Martin. ''Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia'' (1995) [https://www.amazon.com/Soviet-Tragedy-History-Socialism-Russia/dp/0684823136/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761853&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Muravchik, Joshua. ''Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism'' (2003) by conservative historian [https://www.amazon.com/Heaven-Earth-Rise-Fall-Socialism/dp/1893554783/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Novak, Michael. ''Capitalism and Socialism: A Theological Inquiry '' (1988) [https://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Socialism-Theological-Michael-Novak/dp/0844721549/ref=sr_1_19?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-19 excerpt and text search], by leading conservative scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Nove, Alec. ''An Economic History of the USSR 1917-1991'' (3rd ed. 1993) &lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''Communism: A History'' (2003), by a leading conservative &lt;br /&gt;
* Suny, Ronald Grigor. ''The Soviet Experiment: Russia, the USSR, and the Successor States.'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24265044# online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist Terminology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Oppression]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Leftism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Police State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Welfare State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Man-Made Disasters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Threats]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=1646813</id>
		<title>Socialism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=1646813"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T17:32:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Antifa Dayton attacker.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Dressed in all black with his face covered, Antifa terrorist Connor Betts during the [[Dayton nightclub attack]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cernovich.com/connor-betts-the-dayton-ohio-terrorist-was-a-far-left-wing-activist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Betts stated &amp;quot;I want socialism, and I’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round understanding.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Socialism''' refers to a set of related socio-economic systems based on social ownership of the means of production (as opposed to individuals personally owning them) and political management of the economy. It is a failed system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Scaliger, Charles (September 6, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33172-socialist-realities Socialist Realities]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Williamsen, Kurt; Byas, Steve (September 6, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33171-saving-america-with-socialism Saving America With Socialism?] ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Behreandt, Dennis (September 4, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33170-the-failure-of-the-command-economy The Failure of the Command Economy]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Behreandt, Dennis (September 3, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33168-going-with-fair-healthcare Going With “Fair” Healthcare]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 6, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ideology based on [[hate]], [[envy]], and [[mass murder]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Behreandt, Dennis (September 9, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33174-the-deadly-history-of-socialism The Deadly History of Socialism]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 9, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and which promotes [[totalitarianism]] at the expense of [[individual freedom]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scaliger, Charles (September 2, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33169-socialism-explained Socialism Explained]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 2, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Jasper, William F. (December 17, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/34153-socialists-stop-spread-of-success Socialists Stop Spread of Success]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 17, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The movement is responsible for the murder of at least 94 million people over the past 100 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Werth, Nicolas; Panné, Jean-Louis; Paczkowski, Andrzej; Bartosek, Karel; Margolin, Jean-Louis (October 1999), Courtois, Stéphane, ed., ''[https://archive.org/stream/TheBlackBookofCommunism10/the-black-book-of-communism-jean-louis-margolin-1999-communism_djvu.txt  The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression]'', Harvard University Press, p. 4.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The fundamental flaw of socialism is the belief that one person has the right to the fruit of another person's [[labor]] and [[private property]], for example, that healthcare paid by others is a &amp;quot;human right.&amp;quot; Socialism has led to increased bureaucracy and reduced freedom even in Scandinavia,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meninger, Edward J. (September 10, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33173-do-it-like-denmark Do It Like Denmark?] ''The New American''. Retrieved September 10, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and it has been tried and failed in countries such as the [[United Kingdom]], [[India]], and [[Israel]] during the 20th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Edwards, Lee (October 16, 2019). [https://www.heritage.org/progressivism/commentary/three-nations-tried-socialism-and-rejected-it Three Nations That Tried Socialism and Rejected It]. ''The Heritage Foundation''. Retrieved October 23, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political theory, socialism relies on scapegoating to build a constituent base. For example, that &amp;quot;the rich,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Jews,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;millionaires and billionaires,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;the top 1%&amp;quot; are responsible for all of humanity's ills. Socialism targets the youth of a nation and people without life experience using naive, simplistic,  and &amp;quot;feel good&amp;quot; slogans (&amp;quot;[[Medicare for All]],&amp;quot; &amp;quot;tuition-free education,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;free housing.&amp;quot; etc., for example) that on the surface appeal to self-interest, while asking nothing of the hearers to contribute to the economic well being of their fellow citizens or society. Once in power, Socialists compel compliance with [[authoritarian]] decrees (the &amp;quot;individual mandate&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;shared responsibility payment,&amp;quot; for example) suppress criticism, censor [[free speech]], silence or exterminate opposition in order to maintain power for themselves. There is nothing [[democracy|democratic]] about socialism, and terms such as [[democratic socialism]] or [[social democracy]] are [[oxymoron]]s that are typical of Marxist &amp;quot;double speak&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;double think.&amp;quot; Socialist leaders often live in extreme luxury even as they fail to improve the lives of those they rule over,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Maxim (March 11, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/lifestyles-of-the-rich-and-socialist-from-chavez-to-castro-leaders-who-lived-the-high-life Lifestyles of the Rich and Socialist: From Chavez to Castro, leaders who lived the high life]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved March 11, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Snowball, Timothy (May 15, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/443228-socialism-is-neither-a-fair-nor-progressive-political-philosophy Socialism is neither a fair nor 'progressive' political philosophy]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved May 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Jasper, William F. (September 11, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33175-socialism-for-your-benefit-or-theirs Socialism: For Your Benefit — or Theirs?] ''The New American''. Retrieved September 11, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and its destructive effects on society often are irreversible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (May 10, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/10/blue-state-blues-venezuela-south-africa-show-socialism-difficult-to-undo/ Blue State Blues: Venezuela, South Africa Show Socialism Difficult to Undo]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 10, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Demaggio, John M. (July 20, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/453913-has-socialism-already-failed-in-the-united-states Has socialism already failed in the United States?] ''The Hill''. Retrieved July 20, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Socialism is fully compatible with &amp;quot;big business,&amp;quot; or [[crony capitalism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Philipp, Joshua (August 7, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-corrupt-romance-between-big-business-and-socialism_2977800.html The Corrupt Romance Between Big Business and Socialism]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved August 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a social theory, the modern [[Democratic party]] uses [[identity politics]] to create a new &amp;quot;oppressed class&amp;quot; of victims which replaces the traditional worker/peasant/proletariat victims of the imaginary &amp;quot;oppressor class&amp;quot; - &amp;quot;the [[bourgeois]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/PkNzYttjSHE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Socialism preys on people who fall victim to the [[sin]]s of [[envy]] and [[covet]]ousness, and raises [[Iconoclasm]] and [[nihilism]] as exalted [[virtue]]s.  Left-wing professors and universities have played a large role in advancing socialist ideology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Maxim (January 18, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/socialism-rising-universities-and-radical-profs-helping-steer-leftward-shift-in-politics Socialism rising: Universities and ‘radical’ profs helping steer leftward shift in politics, critics say]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many individual socialists and groups display juvenile, adolescent, and cult-like behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, socialism is an [[authoritarian]] system which advocates strict [[economic planning|command and control]] of [[income]]s and distribution or rationing of goods and services, including food and healthcare. High taxation to expropriate wealth from the supposed &amp;quot;oppressor class&amp;quot; is common to all socialist regimes. Removal of incentives and demonizing the [[profit]] motive, while expecting common people to produce goods and services, and supply tax revenues to government, for little or no pay is a [[psychotic]] dream.  After exterminating &amp;quot;corporations&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the rich,&amp;quot; the cost burden of government - which controls everything - naturally falls to an impoverished working class, the unemployed, and homeless which previously paid no taxes. And no one can retain anything for themselves because the profit motive is disincentivized or outlawed. Due to its core [[anti-democratic]] and authoritarian precepts, socialism is considered [[treason]]ous to [[America]]'s central ideal of [[liberty]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism at all times has never amounted to more than a [[criminal]] gang that enlists the aid of academics and disgruntled, naive youth and the misfits of society. One of the most well known socialist regimes of the 20th century was the [[Nazi Party|National Socialist German Workers' Party]] (Nazi Party), headed by [[Adolf Hitler]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/adolf_hitler.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Through [[affirmative action]] programs, Nazism granted workers and peasants access to educational and employment opportunities previously only available to the German bourgeois and [[nobility]] (the &amp;quot;oppressor class&amp;quot;). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both [[Communism]] and [[Nazism]] are [[totalitarian]] or [[statist]], subverting the rights of individuals to the [[collective]] of a [[single party]]. Nazism deviates from orthodox Marxist theory in substituting racial and ethnic conflict for economic [[class warfare]]. Nazism substituted &amp;quot;[[Jews]]&amp;quot; as the oppressor class, responsible for all societal woes, rather than &amp;quot;the rich,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;[[Republican]]s,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;white males&amp;quot; as modern leftists do. The [[Second World War]] was a life and death struggle between two [[leftwing]] interpretations of socialism - both atheistic and subverting the rights of  individuals to the state, one considering &amp;quot;equality&amp;quot; to apply only to members of a nation or race, the other [[multicultural]] and [[globalist]]. After the [[United States]] assisted the [[communist]] victory over [[National Socialism]] (see [[Popular Front liberalism]]), the [[Cold War]] was an effort to suppress the spread of global communism. Socialists consider all forms of [[capitalism]] as &amp;quot;[[fascist]]&amp;quot; (see [[Antifa]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Roots==&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism has its roots in visions of imaginary ideal societies, from thinkers who drew up elaborated designs and concepts for creating what they considered a more equal society, along collectivist lines or abolished [[private property]]; the primary ideas came from British and French thinkers like [[Henri de Saint-Simon|Saint-Simon]], [[Charles Fourier]], Louis Blanc, and [[Robert Owen]] preceded by [[Thomas More]], Tommaso Campanella, and Jean Meslier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historic types==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Backrdv12n2.jpg|right|400px|thumb|The Russian caption reads, &amp;quot;Long live the great unbeatable flag of [[Karl Marx|Marx]], [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]], [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]], [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]]!&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
There are three main kinds of Socialism, all of them are built on the premise of government control of the means of production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Leninism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist Socialism, or '''Leninism''', as revised by [[Vladimir Lenin]] and practiced in the pre-[[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] Soviet Union, was the Socialistic theory developed by Vladimir Lenin during his rise to power. Lenin defined socialism as a transitional stage between capitalism and communism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In striving for socialism, however, we are convinced that it will develop into communism&amp;quot;, Lenin, State and Revolution, Selected Works, Progress publishers, Moscow, 1968, p. 320. (End of chapter four)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Leninism is totalitarian, with no [[democracy]] and all decisions are made by the leaders of the Communist party. Lenin saw the Communist Party as an &amp;quot;elite&amp;quot; that was committed to ending capitalism and instituting socialism in its place and attaining the power by any means possible, including revolution. Lenin was quite mild on the belief, believing that, though controlling of resources was important, the people's will comes first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though [[Bolshevik]] Russia was somewhat more prosperous than its former [[Russian Empire|Tsardom]], Lenin's death in 1924 sparked the overthrow of his Marxist–Leninism and the imposition of [[Stalinism]], the violent, totalitarian belief that went against some of Lenin's ideas (many of Lenin's works were censored by Stalin post-1924).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Democratic&amp;quot; Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ellison-antifa.jpg|right|175px|thumb|[[Democratic National Committee]] Vice-Chair [[Keith Ellison]] promoted Anitfa.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The second form of Socialism (sometimes called &amp;quot;Revisionism&amp;quot;) prevailed in Europe down to the 1970s, and is typified by the [[Fabian Socialism|Fabian Society]] and the British Labour Party. It was inspired by Socialism and closely linked to labor unions that had real power. The goal was for [[Industrial Democracy]], that is, for the government to own (&amp;quot;nationalize&amp;quot;) major industries such as coal mining, railways, steel making, shipbuilding, airlines, and banking. Small businesses remained private. The idea was that labor unions controlled the government and therefore unions controlled working conditions and wages for the benefit of workers, regardless of the damage to long-term economic growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Socialists were well organized and after 1918 they bitterly fought the breakaway faction that became the [[Communist]] movement. In recent years major Socialist parties (in Europe and Canada) have sometimes dropped the long-standing demands for state ownership of the means of production and have mostly accepted &amp;quot;Controlled Capitalism&amp;quot;. However, they remain tied to labor unions and favor liberal policies regarding high taxes and public spending. Conservatives have been negative toward the economics of the second form of socialism. Conservatives complain socialists use government power to redistribute wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within the [[European Union]], a form of [[democratic socialism]] was initially viewed as successful but eventually lead to lowered social equity and a downward spiraling economy, as well as general discontent. Although this acts as a drag on the economy, in democratic countries of the industrialized west, some socialist ideas have been put into practice with varying degrees of success. Beginning in 2010 many European countries were racked with rioting and social unrest as governments began to back away from out-of-control entitlements that began bankrupting them and lead to a world financial crisis because of unrestrained debt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791804575439732358241708.html WSJ; &amp;quot;Obstacle to Deficit Cutting: A Nation on Entitlements&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100929/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_europe_austerity_protests_10 Anti-austerity protests sweep across Europe]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.allbusiness.com/economy-economic-indicators/economic-policy-bailouts/14758032-1.html &amp;quot;Debt crisis pushes Europe toward economic reforms&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early 21st century, Socialism was becoming increasingly prominent in the West.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ozimek, Tom (November 9, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/socialism-stirs-again-30-years-after-collapse-of-berlin-wall_3141025.html Socialism Stirs Again 30 Years After Collapse of Berlin Wall]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved November 9, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Communal Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
The third form of Socialism has nothing to do with Marx or government ownership, and emphasizes the importance of the community over the individual.  Usually it means small communities sharing most of their possessions. The most famous examples are the religious [[Shakers]] of the 19th century (a conservative group), and the new-left communes that briefly existed in the 1960s and 70s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Early American settlers, as in Plymouth or Virginia, tried it but quickly abandoned it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Pilgrims in Plymouth used communal farming their first winter but then after a dismal harvest that first year, moved to a system where there was a more direct incentive other than guilt and honor. Governor Bradford summed it up in his journal:&lt;br /&gt;
:* &amp;quot;And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number, for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance) and ranged all boys and youth under some family. This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Not only were all hands more industrious—the incentive to harvest communal corn before it was fully ripe, a problem equivalent to poaching in the case of wildlife, was also eliminated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Robertsincentives.html Incentives Matter] - Russell Roberts - Library of Economics and Liberty&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Influence of Russia on socialism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Not until the birth of the [[Soviet Union]] after the [[Communist Revolution]] did the idea become generally accepted that socialism meant government seizing ownership of the economy.  Experience in 19th and 20th century [[France]], [[England]], and [[Germany]], however, made it clear that regulatory control by government bureaucrats is sufficient to implement socialism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ What is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Communism (the primary variant of socialism) the central goal is to establish a &amp;quot;[[workers' paradise]]&amp;quot;-an ideal state with perfect equality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In practice the socialist government owns the banks, railroads, farmlands, factories, and stores, and is the only employer, or at least controls the regulation of production and distribution.  The central goal is to destroy the &amp;quot;evils of capitalism&amp;quot; by government ownership or control of the means of production, usually with one party controlling the government on behalf of the working class. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist system never manages to establish this &amp;quot;paradise&amp;quot; because management for the benefit of the employees leads to featherbedding and lack of investment or economic growth, at the expense of consumers.  Collective farming (operating farms like factories) sharply reduced the food supply. The most thoroughgoing efforts by Communist regimes turned into authoritarian dictatorships. The government controls all investments, production, distribution, income, and prices, as well as all organizations, schools, news media and formerly private societies. Churches and labor unions are suppressed or controlled by the government. Socialism is the antithesis of [[capitalism]], because it opposes private ownership of capital or land, and rejects the free market in favor of central planning. It also rejects &amp;quot;civil society&amp;quot; and makes sure that all organizations are controlled by the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically, socialist regimes can have multiple parties. In practice there is only one political party, and it controls the government. The leaders of the party choose the government officials and set all policies for the nation and for cities and localities.  Opposition parties are not allowed access to the media or to meeting halls or to funding, and their leaders are often arrested as &amp;quot;enemies of the people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the redistribution of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the many over the rights of the few, but in practice when socialist economic principles are forced onto a nation by a totalitarian government a new Upper Class appears which is much better off than the Lower Class.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- Winston Churchill&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.quotesdaddy.com/quote/280995/winston-churchill/socialism-is-a-philosophy-of-failure-the-creed-of Churchill; Quotesdaddy.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism supposedly is an &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot; pursuit. Raisa Gorbachev, the wife of the last General Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party [[Mikhail Gorbachev]], held a &amp;quot;PhD in Marxism-Leninism.&amp;quot;  Raisa Gorbachev died in a German hospital of [[leukemia]] because her beloved Soviet homeland was incapable of delivering proper healthcare, even for the elite of the Soviet Socialist Republic, after 70 years of socialism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===National Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|250px|right|One of the most well known political parties of the 20th century  was the [[National Socialist]] party of Germany headed by the [[evolution|evolutionary racist]] [[Adolf Hitler]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mises&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://mises.org/daily/1937&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;darNaz&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hott&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.hourofthetime.com/socialist.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ludwig von Mises Institute]] declares:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|The identification of [[Nazi]] [[Germany]] as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of [[Ludwig von Mises]]...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.}} Hitler found the notion of single-party control very attractive. That, and the idea of creating a &amp;quot;New man&amp;quot; in a godless socialist order, enlightened by science, victorious over their oppressors. Nazism was outlawed at the end of [[World War II]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Commonalities of Communism, Nazism and liberalism===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism|Fascism and the New Deal}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
!Communist Manifesto&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nazi]] Party Platform&lt;br /&gt;
!Analysis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The stripping away of land from private owners.  [[Liberalism]] today demands &amp;quot;eminent domain&amp;quot; on property.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand the nationalization of all trusts...profit-sharing in large industries...a generous increase in old-age pensions...by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor...and the creation of a national (folk) army.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The points raised in the [[Nazi]] platform demand an increase in taxes to support them.  Liberalism today demands heavy progressive and graduated income taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Abolition of all rights of inheritance.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|Liberalism today demands a &amp;quot;death tax&amp;quot; on anyone inheriting an estate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Nuremberg Laws of 1934 allowed Germany to take Jewish property.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand the nationalization of all trusts.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of the financial system.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press...editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens...Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State...the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of the press.  Liberals today demand control or suppression of talk radio and Fox News.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &amp;amp;c, &amp;amp;c.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of education, with an emphasis on doing things their way.  Liberals today are doing things ''their way'' in our schools.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Britain, the Labour Party and Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
At its inception, the [[Labour Party]] borrowed socialist ideas by committing itself to a program of nationalization under 'Clause 4' of their Constitution, but was always fundamentally committed to the British system of parliamentary government. Clause 4 was formally dropped after the election of [[Tony Blair]] as Party leader, signaling the creation of 'New' Labour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/21/newsid_2515000/2515825.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The British governments of 1945-1950 and 1950-1951 under [[Clement Attlee]] implemented the nationalization of several industries and utilities, including coal, steel, water, railways and electricity. Former owners of nationalized industries were compensated.  The best-known example is the nationalization of health care to create the [[National Health Service]] (NHS).  This made - literally overnight - health care &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; at the point of delivery for everybody in Britain, and it remains so today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1980s under Conservative Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] most of the nationalized industries were returned to the private sector, and public housing has been sold to the residents. These conservative decisions were endorsed by the &amp;quot;New Labour&amp;quot; of Tony Blair, to the annoyance of elderly radicals who fondly remember the poverty and inefficiencies of the old system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Obamunism ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Obamunism}}&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2010, [[American]] political consultant [[Dick Morris]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|When [[Obama]] took office, federal, state and local spending accounted for 30 percent of [[gross domestic product]]. Now it is up to 35 percent, and when health care is fully implemented, it will rise to above 40 percent. But taxes are still below 30 percent. The difference is the deficit, now grown to 10 percent of our GDP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If our government is to continue spending 40 percent of our GDP, we will morph into the European model of a socialist democracy. But if we can roll the spending back to 30 percent, while holding taxes level, we will retain our free market system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/columnists/DickMorrisandEileenMcGann/2010/04/24/the_silent_killer_obamas_vat_proposal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shepard-Fairey-imgs.JPG|right|thumb|250px|[[Shepard Fairey]], designer of the official Obama hope and change logo, is more known for his anti-American and pro-communist themes. Here a  [[Mao Zedong|Maoist]]  revolutionary is depicted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://images.google.com/images?um=1&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-ContextMenu&amp;amp;rlz=1I7ACAW_en___US352&amp;amp;tbs=isch:1&amp;amp;q=Shepard+Fairey&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;start=40&amp;amp;ndsp=20&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Anita Dunn]], the political strategist and former White House Communications Director, admitted that one of favorite political philosophers, one that she “turns to the most”, is [[Mao Zedong]], the [[communism|communist]] dictator responsible for the starvation, torture, and killing of 70 million Chinese.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/blog/2009/10/16/anita-dunn-favorite-philosopher-mao-tse-tung/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of the Obama administration have coined the word &amp;quot;[[Obamunism]]&amp;quot; to describe Barack Obama's socialistic and &amp;quot;[[fascism]] light&amp;quot; [[economic planning]] policies ([[Benito Mussolini]] defined fascism as the wedding of state and corporate powers.  Accordingly, trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] labels [[Obama administration corporate bailouts|Obama's corporate bailouts]] as being &amp;quot;fascism light&amp;quot; in nature).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/daily-intel/2009/07/20/obamunism-inc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.smallbusinessadvocate.com/small-business-interviews/gerald-celente-6944&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obamunism can also [[Allusion|allude]] to Obama's [[Obama administration fiscal policy|ruinous fiscal policies]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|reckless monetary policies]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://seekingalpha.com/article/120883-monetary-policynot-obama-s-stimulusis-what-needs-watching&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nypost.com/seven/05172009/postopinion/editorials/bams_wise_words_169731.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Stimulus====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Larry Summers]] was the Director of the White House's National Economic Council (NEC) for President Barack Obama. George Gerald Reisman, Professor Emeritus of Economics at [[Pepperdine University]] and author of ''Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics'', wrote that Summers' socialistic ideas on redistributing wealth demonstrate that [[Larry Summers]] is a &amp;quot;lightweight leftist&amp;quot; who &amp;quot;fails to understand the nature of the most essential feature of capitalism, namely, private ownership of the means of production and the indispensable role it plays in the standard of living of the average person.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;misesblog&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://blog.mises.org/archives/009031.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Reisman also wrote that Summers is a shallow and ignorant man whose knowledge of economics is minimal and whose evil views qualify him to be the economic advisor to [[Hugo Chavez]] of [[Venezuela]] or [[Robert Mugabe]] of [[Zimbabwe]], but do not qualify him to be an economic advisor to the President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;misesblog&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Land grab====&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2010, [[Hot Air]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The federal government, as the memo boasted, is the nation’s “largest land manager.” It already owns roughly [http://bigthink.com/ideas/21343 one of every three acres] in the United States. This is apparently not enough. At a “listening session” in New Hampshire last week, government bureaucrats trained their sights on millions of [http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9HGKEAG0.htm private forest land]  throughout the [[New England]] region. Agriculture Secretary [[Tom Vilsack]] crusaded for “the need for additional attention to the Land and Water Conservation Fund — and the need to promptly support full funding of that fund.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Property owners have every reason to be worried. The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is a pet project of green radicals, who want the decades-old government slush fund for buying up private lands to be freed from congressional appropriations oversight. It’s paid for primarily with receipts from the government’s offshore oil and gas leases. Both Senate and House Democrats have included $900 million in full LWCF funding, not subject to congressional approval, in their energy/BP oil spill legislative packages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/archives/2010/08/14/great-outdoors-initiative-a-federal-land-grab/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====You didn't build that====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{main|You didn't build that}}&lt;br /&gt;
On July 13, 2012, at a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Obama gave a speech that immediately stirred up controversy. Speaking about the government's role in the success of private business, he said:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/13/remarks-president-campaign-event-roanoke-virginia Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event in Roanoke, Virginia], White House&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help.  There was a great teacher somewhere in your life.  Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.  Somebody invested in roads and bridges.  If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that.  Somebody else made that happen.}} The [[Romney]] campaign has used &amp;quot;If you’ve got a business—you didn’t build that&amp;quot; in ads to show America that Obama believes it is government that creates business rather than hard-working individuals. The Obama campaign has alternatively stated that the sentenced was poorly worded since he was not giving a scripted speech and that when Obama said &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; he was referring to roads and bridges. Obama points to a later portion of his speech in which he said, &amp;quot;The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together,&amp;quot; to support his claim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Obamacare ''diktats''====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ObamaCareSymbol.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Image courtesy [[Newsbusters]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obamacare}}&lt;br /&gt;
The centerpiece of Obamacare was the [[individual mandate]] or ''[[diktat]]'', a provision that makes it mandatory for every citizen to purchase private health insurance, which was unprecedented in American history. There was no [[bi-partisan]] or national consensus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Epic [[Direct spending#New spending|new spending]] and taxes, pricier insurance, rationed care, dishonest accounting: The Pelosi health bill has it all. [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703399204574505423751140690.html Nancy Pelosi's New Health-Care Bill], ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'', November 01, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[President Obama]], Senate Majority Leader [[Harry Reid]] and House Speaker [[Nancy Pelosi]] rammed Obamacare down the throats of an unwilling American public. Half a year removed from the unprecedented legislative chicanery and backroom dealing that characterized the bill's passage, much more is known about the bill than when it was passed into law. [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Obamacare-is-even-worse-than-critics-thought-960772-103571664.html Examiner Editorial: Obamacare is even worse than critics thought], ''Washington Examiner'', September 22, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More than 150 million Americans were completely locked out of the process.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Crabtree, S. (2009, October 20). &amp;quot;[https://thehill.com/homenews/house/63941-democrats-lock-republicans-out-of-committee-room Democrats Lock Republicans Out of Committee Room].&amp;quot; ''The Hill''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Pershing, B. (2009, October 23). &amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/22/AR2009102204442.html Democrats on House Committee Lock Out Republicans].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Freeman, J. (2009, October 20). &amp;quot;House Democrats Lock GOP Out of Committee Room.&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(2009, October 21). &amp;quot;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/21/oversight-panels-democrats-lock-republicans-dispute/ Oversight Panel's Democrats Lock Out Republicans After Dispute].&amp;quot; ''FOX News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's progressive Democratic Socialists had single party control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davis, S. (2009, April 28). &amp;quot;[https://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/04/28/sen-specter-to-switch-parties-democrats-near-60-vote-majority/ Sen. Specter To Switch Parties, Democrats Near 60 Vote Majority].&amp;quot; Washington Wire. ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;keithmsnbcer (2009, April 29). &amp;quot;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGYBbFMeFNc Bernie Sanders on Ed Show].&amp;quot; ''MSNBC''. YouTube.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Censorship of journalists====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obamagate timeline 2009-2014 vanguardism}}&lt;br /&gt;
On May 13, 2013 the [[Associated Press]] announced telephone records for 20 of their reporters had been [[subpoena]]ed by the Justice Department. The Justice Dept. subpoenaed the phone records of AP from [[Verizon]] and other service providers.&amp;lt;ref name=verizonslate&amp;gt;{{cite web|last=Gallagher|first=Ryan|title=Verizon Wireless Secretly Passed AP Reporters' Phone Records to Feds|publisher=www.slate.com|date=May 16, 2013|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/05/16/verizon_wireless_passed_ap_reporters_phone_records_to_the_feds.html|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The AP claimed these acts were a &amp;quot;massive and unprecedented intrusion&amp;quot; into news-gathering.&amp;lt;ref name=TTSanchez&amp;gt;{{cite web|last=Sanchez|first=Raf|title=US Justice Department secretly seizes Associated Press phone records|publisher=The Telegraph|date=May 13, 2013|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-politics/10055318/US-Justice-Department-secretly-seizes-Associated-Press-phone-records.html|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=TG130513&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Washington (AP)|title=US government secretly obtained Associated Press phone records|publisher=The Guardian|date=May 13, 2013|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/may/13/america-government-associated-press-phone-records|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; CEO Gary Pruitt of AP stated: &amp;quot;These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP's newsgathering operations and disclose information about AP's activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=CNNJohns&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Matt Smith and Joe Johns|title=AP blasts feds for phone records search|publisher=CNN|date=May 14, 2013|url=https://www.cnn.com/2013/05/13/us/justice-ap-phones/?hpt=hp_t2|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=holder&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Gary B. Pruitt|title=AP letter to Eric Holder on seizure of phone records|publisher=USA Today|date=May 13, 2013|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/05/13/doj-seizes-ap-phone-records/2156819/|accessdate=June 1, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few years earlier, Attn. Gen. [[Eric Holder]] renewed a subpoena of James Risen, a reporter for the ''[[New York Times]]''. Risen and a colleague reported on warrantless wiretaps. The coverage won Risen and colleague a [[Pulitzer Prize]] for “carefully sourced stories on secret domestic eavesdropping that stirred a national debate.” The Justice Dept. [[John Brennan]], an avowed communist, played a key role in the illegal wiretap program, overseeing the production of what personnel in the program called the “scary memos” intended to justify domestic spying exposed by Risen. Brennan later admitted that he relied on information from CIA's torture program rather than domestic spying, which was used as a cover.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2013 [[Comey]]'s [[FBI]] opened a case on [[CBS News]] anchor [[Sharyl Attkisson]] under the auspices of '[[national security]].' Attkisson reported news embarrassing to Eric Holder on [[Operation Fast and Furious]] and extensively on the [[Benghazi massacre]] coverup.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wyden.senate.gov&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.wyden.senate.gov/download/?id=285dc9e7-195a-4467-b0fe-caa857fc4e0d&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Police state surveillance of opponents====&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also : [[Obamagate timeline 2015 progressive police state]] and [[Obamagate timeline|Obamagate timeline 2016 election year]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contradictory Goals of Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism's stated purpose is to eliminate the huge gap between the highest and lowest classes of society. Their bitter complaint has been that the upper class exploits its dominance to gain privileges and wealth, while the lower class must suffer tyranny and poverty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;all socialists agree that a socialist economy must be run for the benefit of the vast majority of the people rather than for a small aristocratic, plutocratic, or capitalist class.&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_an_economic_system]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This obsession with class paradoxically creates a group of people with a vested interest in seeing class differences remain (socialist politicians, [[community organizer]]s, ''etc.''); if by some means the class system actually ''were'' destroyed, these people would be out of a job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another essential goal of most socialist thinkers has been to eliminate [[Capitalism]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;... one of the fundamental goals of the socialist movement throughout history has been the abolition of capitalism&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_opposition_and_criticisms_of_socialism_arguments_for_and_against A Wisdom Archive on Socialism - Opposition and criticisms of socialism; arguments for and against]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
on the grounds that only &amp;quot;social control&amp;quot; of the economy can prevent abuses such as [[feudalism]], [[monopoly]], [[cartel]]s, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But experiments on both a moderate and a grand scale have shown that socialism's main purpose has been undermined by its unremitting opposition to [[free market]] economics. In its drive to eliminate capitalism, it has overlooked the fact that general prosperity is vouchsafed by [[economic freedom]], and that free market economics improves the lot of the poor much more quickly and permanently than any system of central economic control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real aim of socialists is probably personal: why else would socialists want to create programs which encourage Dependency? Well, it fits into their lust for power. &lt;br /&gt;
People who want to control others need people who are willing to be controlled.&lt;br /&gt;
Independent, proactive people do not fit into the socialist Power Model. That is why the first thing [[Karl Marx|Marx]] wanted to remove from the economy was the [[Profit]] Motive: it gives people an incentive to make their own decisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key elements==&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the expropriation of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the nomenklatura over the rights of workers and earners.  Many of the most notoriously oppressive dictatorships have been socialist, such as the [[Soviet Union]] and China under Mao Zedong. Private wealth was seized and the owners executed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Economic theory===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Atheism|atheist]] [[Karl Marx]] is sometimes referred to as the father of socialism. Economist Thomas Sowell observed:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The Marxian contribution to economics can be readily summarized as virtually zero. Professional economics as it exists today reflects no indication that Karl Marx ever existed... [T]he development of modern economics has simply ignored Marx. Even economists who are Marxists typically utilize a set of analytical tools to which Marx contributed nothing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thomas Sowell, ''[http://books.google.com/books?id=TVkVAAAAIAAJ Marxism: Philosophy and Economics]'' (Taylor &amp;amp; Francis, 1985) ISBN 0043201717, p. 217.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the individual is subordinate to the collective, the use of [[democide]], or &amp;quot;death by government,&amp;quot; is another feature of socialism in the final stage of bringing about a single party, anti-democratic totalitarian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Welfare state===&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, democratic socialism calls for equalization of incomes, through taxation of private wealth coupled with welfare state spending. The [[nationalization]] of major industries is primarily a device to allow the unionized workers to control their own wages and working conditions, cutting out the capitalistic owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State [[pension]]s and unemployment insurance were not brought in by Socialists—they were first introduced by arch-conservative Chancellor [[Bismarck]] in Germany in the 1870s. In Britain they were introduced about 1910 by [[Winston Churchill]] and [[David Lloyd George]] of the [[Liberal Party]], and in the U.S. were part of Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt's [[New Deal]] in the 1930s.  Welfare state ideas such as [[universal health care]], and state control of key industries have been common throughout the developed world in the modern era. However, the United States has always rejected socialism as an ideological position, with a few exceptions such as the [[TVA]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===So-called &amp;quot;mixed economies&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Social democracy|Mixed economy}}&lt;br /&gt;
Social democracies and Mixed economies are socialism by [[incrementalism]]. Often socialism is a matter of degree and numerous economies in the world are very socialistic such as [[Europe]]an countries (many of which are facing financial difficulties due to over taxation and excessive spending).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/05/european_socialism_is_bleeding.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The single party has yet to gain full control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because many businesses still are privately owned, [[ipso facto]], the [[United States]] is not a socialistic government. &amp;quot;That definition is confuted by the earliest theoretical writings on socialism.  In France, Henri de Saint-Simon, in the first decades of the 1800s, and his pupil and colleague [[Auguste Comte]], in the 1820s and 30s, along with [[Robert Owen]] contemporaneously in England, ''stated that the essential feature of what Owen called socialism is government regulation of the means of production and distribution.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ Thomas E. Brewton; Once Again: What Is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
When the government controls the volume of money and its economic applications, it has the economy in a stranglehold.  When government controls education so that nothing other than secular socialism may be taught, as Saint-Simon advocated, it controls the future destiny of a nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
Some forms of socialism have often been [[atheism|atheistic]] in character, and many leading socialists (most prominently Karl Marx) have been critical of the role of religion - and conservative religion in particular - which they criticize for lending support to an unjust social order. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Socialists have been Christians, and there has been considerable interplay between Christian and Socialist ideas. [[Christian socialists]] have asserted that early Christian communities, in particular, displayed certain traits, such as the holding of possessions in common,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:44: &amp;quot;Everyone was filled with awe, and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the rejection of conventional sexual mores and gender roles, the provision for communal education, etc., that could be considered similar to socialism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the chaos sparked by the advent of the Reformation in Europe, several sects with radical new interpretations of Christianity sprung up, many of them Anabaptists (believers in adult baptism). Under the leadership of the reformer Thomas Muntzer the peasants of south-west Germany rose up in arms against the clergy and nobility, establishing anarcho-communes in their wake. Though they were massacred to a man, ten years later a group of radical Anabaptists under the leadership of Jan Matthys seized control of the north-western Germany city of Munster from the Prince-Archbishop there and established a Christian-Communist state. True to the spirit of applied communism, Mathys took twelve wives, held lavish feasts for himself and his most loyal followers and had himself crowned King of the World as the city starved, besieged by an alliance of Protestant and Catholic forces keen to see them exterminated. Mathys and all his followers were all tortured and killed when the Prince-Archbishop returned with professional troops to sack the city and reassert his authority, effectively wiping out all non-pacifistic Anabaptists in north-western Germany. Only Baptists as we know them today survived the following persecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See, for instance,  Arnold Toynbee, the British historian, has responded to this,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Marxian excerpt from a Christian Socialism is an experiment which is doomed to failure because it has denied itself the aid of the spiritual power which alone is capable of making Socialism a success. ….'Christianity', they say, 'is the opiate of the People'; and, in the [[Soviet Union]]… Christianity or of any other theistic religion have been debarred… from admission to membership of the All-Union Communist Party. In fact, Communism has been definitely and militantly anti-Christian. Thus the campaign against Christianity which is to-day an integral part of the propaganda of [[Marxian Socialism]] is a challenge to the living generation of Christians …we latter-day Christians may still turn a Marxian attack upon Christianity to good account … a re-awakening of the Christian social conscience has been the one great positive practical achievement of Karl Marx&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'', Annex II to Vol. V, Part C (i) (c) 2, p. 585-586, Marxism, Socialism, and Christianity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Alleged New Testament socialism in a godless utopia====&lt;br /&gt;
Socialist claim the earliest Christians were decidedly living in a manner consistent with basic aims of socialism, albeit with critical requirements and distinctions from its secularist expressions. Luke 14:33 requires the forsaking of all one has if one will be a disciple of Christ, and while this is not shown to necessarily always require the literally forsaking of all,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Acts 2:44 states that the communal believers &amp;quot;had all things common&amp;quot;. Acts 4:32-5:11 also describes community redistribution of property, and details the Divine punishment of a husband and wife for hypocrisy, in keeping proceeds from the sale of a piece of property while openly pretending that they gave it all, as others  voluntarily did.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible, (5:1-11)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, forsaking all is shown to be that of first surrendering oneself and life to the God of the Bible, and placing all at His disposal,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry (1662 - 1714), ''Commentary on the Whole Bible'', Lk. 14:25-35&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Archibald Thomas Robertson, ''WORD PICTURES IN THE NEW TESTAMENT'', Lk. 14:33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with literal giving as a result being as He directs, and voluntary. (2Cor. 8,9) &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all things, may abound to every good work: (2 Corinthians 9:7-8)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the early organic community provides a noble model of communal life, and of a &amp;quot;seminary&amp;quot; type experience, it was also soon dispersed by persecution (thus greatly expanding the church: Acts 8:1-5; 11:19), and it is later indicated that believers retained ownership of property after conversion. (Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13) Rich Christians are evidenced to have been part of the early church, but were not mandated by the church itself to give all they had away, but to be lowly in mind, and to be ready and willing to distribute, in faith and surrender to God. (1Tim. 6:17-19) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, in both Testaments capitalism is clearly supported,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gary North, ''Capitalism and the Bible''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  and indolence is not subsidized, but penalized by poverty, while diligence in work is rewarded by its fruits. (Prov. 6:6-11; 13:4; 20:4; 2 Thes. 3:10-12; 1 Tim. 5:17-18) Although holy widows over 60 years old who were without familial support were taken in by the church, a man is clearly required to provide for his own family, if able. (1Tim. 5:2ff) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
While the success of the early church as an organic community is often invoked in support of modern socialism, and many communes of the 1960s evoked the Bible, the early organic church was a result of the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit among believers, while the &amp;quot;administrators&amp;quot; were humble servants who were examples of self-sacrifice, and who worked with their own hands as needed, (1Cor. 4:9-16) and whose authority was established by manifest Divine attestation, including the pro-active exercise of church discipline being only by supernatural or otherwise spiritual means, not carnal force.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:43; 5:5,9,10; 1Cor. 4:19-21; 2Cor. 13:2,3; 2Thes. 3:14,15; 2Tim. 4:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, other distinctions, without the unique changes and influence resulting from faith and full surrender to Christ from all the community, and His anointing upon the work, attempts to mimic the communal life of Christians have failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As one critic of modern-day  socialism states: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Socialism, unfortunately, completely disregards Biblical teaching about the fallen nature of human beings and assumes that human beings will act in a morally upright fashion if their basic needs are met. This is at the heart of why socialistic systems never work: because human nature does not work in this fashion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/06/capitalism-and-socialism-in-light-of-the-bible Bob Ellis, ''Capitalism and Socialism in Light of the Bible''] Dakota Voice, June 23rd, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Atheism and socialism ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[John Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton|Acton]] Institute states concerning [[atheism and socialism]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|...a growing body of research reveals that as the welfare state grows, the church shrinks. Adam Kay of Duke University discovered that church and state have a “[https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ed70/6904ff2959ec495fb0816dcbf2c19b967fdd.pdf hydraulic relationship]”: Events “that lower [[faith]] in one of these external systems (e.g., the government) lead to subsequent increases in faith in the other (e.g., [[God]]).” Another study found that increased welfare spending “in a specific year predicted lower religiosity one to two years later.” It [https://blog.acton.org/archives/101251-gods-power-can-be-outsourced-to-the-government-study.html concluded], “The power and order emanating from God can be outsourced to the government.”...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...faith in the transcendent gets crowded out by faith in [[socialism]]’s [[utopia]]n promise of equality-of-outcome on earth. This path transformed Michael Harrington from a daily communicant volunteering in the Catholic Worker movement to the [[atheism|atheistic]] founder of the Democratic Socialists of America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.eurasiareview.com/21122019-how-socialism-causes-atheism-oped/ How Socialism Causes Atheism – OpEd]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
''This section confuses &amp;quot;interpretation&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ideology of '''Socialism''' is subject to a variety of interpretations. From a conservative perspective, Marxist socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production are seized and monopolized by the government sometimes without compensation to the builders of the [[capital]]. Investments, production, distribution, income, prices, and economic justice are administered by a government [[nomenklatura]] that regulates the transfer of money, goods (including capital goods), and services primarily through taxation, regulation and aggressive institutionalized coercion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some socialists reject this description. Democratic socialists advocate a system of governance based on the principles of [[solidarity]], [[equality]] and [[liberty]], viewing these principles as interconnected. They believe increased socio-economic equality is associated with increased practical freedom to fulfill human potential. In many countries, such as Britain, socialist movements have been built on Christian, democratic and co-operative bases, embracing the notion that individuals should 'treat others as they would wish to be treated', and arguing that all individuals have a moral responsibility for the welfare of other members of their society. Socialism seeks to prioritize human welfare over other goals, such as profit and wealth accumulation by elites; it views increased redistribution of wealth as vital to securing greater freedom and happiness for the bulk of the people. Though this rosy picture of socialism is appealing to many, it ignores what Hayek called &amp;quot;[[the road to serfdom]].&amp;quot;  Though in theory socialism is an idealized, egalitarian form of economics, in practice it means rule by labor bosses who minimize individualism and economic growth in the name of equality and benefits for the working class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Karl Marx]] considered socialism to be a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. In his view, socialism is summed up by the expression: &amp;quot;From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.&amp;quot; A major criticism of socialism is that it infringes individual rights in favor of the populace. In a very real sense, politics in the Western World throughout the 20th century was shaped by the conflict between socialist and capitalist governmental policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although socialist parties are common in Europe, the leading examples all currently embrace some free enterprise, individual property rights and certain other aspects of capitalism although leading European Socialists are very critical of America. In many European countries, socialism has been changing to [[Social democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Hayek]] and [[Ludwig von Mises]] were important critics of socialism, particularly regarding what is known as the Socialist Calculation Debate.  Hayek and Mises argued that a socialist economy would face information constraints that would prevent even well-intentioned planners from efficiently allocating resources.  That is, the planners would not know how much a battleship or a hospital cost, and could not efficiently allocate resources among different choices.  This criticism should be considered as compatible with, but independent of, criticisms based on [[Public choice theory]] that bring into consideration the incentives of political actors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Svetlana Kunin, who lived in the Soviet Union until 1980 explains how the system worked: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Life in the USSR modeled the socialist ideal. God-based religion was suppressed and replaced with cultlike adoration for political figures....Only the ruling class of communist leaders had access to special stores, medicine and accommodations that could compare to those in the West. The rest of the citizenry had to deal with permanent shortages of food and other necessities, and had access to free but inferior, unsanitary and low-tech medical care.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
USSR, 1959: I am a &amp;quot;young pioneer&amp;quot; in school. History classes remind us that there is a higher authority than their parents and teachers: the leaders of the Communist Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Those who left Russia found a different set of values in America: freedom of religion, speech, individual pursuits, the right to private property and free enterprise....These opportunities let the average immigrant live a better life than many elites in the Soviet Communist Party...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The slogans of &amp;quot;fairness and equality&amp;quot; sound better than the slogans of capitalism. But unlike at the beginning of the 20th century, when these slogans and ideas were yet to be tested, we have accumulated history and reality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/SpecialReport.aspx?id=512665 ''The Perspective Of A Russian Immigrant''], ''Investors Business Daily,'' 09/10/2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A government which adheres to economic socialistic principles also tends to have cultures which prize unmerited equality among citizen and criminal alike, and through extension of socialistic welfare policies, between the chronically employed and the chronically unemployed, by ensuring both groups receive income though only one group works for income. This enables people otherwise healthy to not seek gainful employment because they will receive income no matter their actions, thus providing no incentive to produce. The economies of socialistic governments are thus weak and riddled with flaws, such as expecting increased production from a reduced workforce, and when engendered with a progressive culture, which simply means people who do are the same as people who do not, eventually fall under the weight of their own poorly managed and over-extended public welfare institutions. Public welfare also decreases personal charity, thus making the people dependent on the aid of the government since charitable aid, such as from a church, is discouraged by the secular nature of socialistic nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialists occasionally appeal to the fact that God, in the Old Testament, commanded His own nation to surrender a tenth of its proceeds for the maintenance of the priests and for the care of the sickly and weak. But, while fallen men, and their secular and pagan nations, shall always struggle to understand the righteous balances between government and liberty.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;npr&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.npr.org/2011/08/23/139761274/how-the-a-p-changed-the-way-we-shop ''The Great A&amp;amp;P and the Struggle for Small Business in America''], &amp;quot;NPR’s interview of the book’s author, Marc Levinson&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (i.e., between local and national logistics, as well as between the logistics of the individual person and those of his community) the mark of socialism is the general allowance for a naive, and willingly ignorant, adult sub-population whose members prefer, despite the limitations imposed by bureaucratic accountability, to live under all the securities rightly afforded in the fallen world only to infants. In the unfallen world, such security was a given for all persons, but without any of the bureaucracy required in the fallen world for maintaining it. In the fallen world, such security is an unattainable ideal, so that the more is done to attain it, the more the society suffers under the requisite bureaucracy. And, while the initial policy made toward that ideal is the creation of an executive class or executive vocation, such as monarchies and professional armies,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=1Sa&amp;amp;c=8&amp;amp;t=KJV#19 ''First Samuel 8:19-20''] Blue Letter Bible&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wbur.org/media-player?url=http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2011/09/29/consequences-combat-vietnam&amp;amp;title=The+Consequences+Of+Combat&amp;amp;segment=consequences-combat-vietnam&amp;amp;pubdate=2011-09-29&amp;amp;source=hereandnow ''Interview of Vietnam war veteran, and '''What It Is Like To Go To War''' author, Karl Marlantes, on NPR's Here And Now'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there is a 'tipping point' in the creation of bureaucratic entities beyond which any civilization cannot help but increasingly lose its footing in the struggle to balance all its righteous human interests. The result is an ever-increasing proportion of that civilization's total population which, for all variety of reasons, becomes enslaved to their own demands for that ideal of security. When there is no judge who judges righteously, when all the people make the laws, and when the power of money is used to try to stay ahead of the natural consequences of unrighteousness, the 'bad money' cannot help but drive out the 'good money', until the 'Bank of Reality' is forced to call in the loan, and the civilization implodes to the point that it falls victim also to militant invaders and, or, to unmanageable internal unrest.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;npr&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Past Socialist Countries==&lt;br /&gt;
===Chile===&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist socialist leader [[Salvador Allende]] was elected in Chile in 1970 in a minority government run by the Popular Unity Party. Allende's economic policy, known as the Vuskovic Plan, sought to achieve transition to socialism. The Vuskovic Plan involved nationalization of large foreign enterprises, land redistribution to farmers, and redistribution of income. The majority in Parliament never supported it and the plan was never carried out as Allende was overthrown by the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Socialist Countries (Current)==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Cuba]]===&lt;br /&gt;
Communist leader [[Fidel Castro]] violently overthrew the Cuban government in the 1950s and has declared Cuba to be communist since then, nationalizing millions of dollars worth of American-owned property. It is notable that Fidel Castro originally self-defined as [[liberal]], before coming out openly as a communist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;esrc=s&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;cd=5&amp;amp;ved=0CGoQFjAE&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fib-global-history-ii-period-5.aspen.high.schoolfusion.us%2Fmodules%2Flocker%2Ffiles%2Fget_group_file.phtml%3Ffid%3D6868636%26gid%3D1176955%26sessionid%3D0&amp;amp;ei=o74IUPDNOqPp6wGbtPGxCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1bEoHrxurCF_WL1OPKMxIb4hCTw Fidel Castro - His Rise and Rule of Cuba]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today, Cuba faces copious economic problems and the people lack their fundamental rights. (Fidel's brother [[Raul Castro]] now runs the country, having taken it over from his ailing brother Fidel.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[North Korea]]'s form of communism is in the form of &amp;quot;Juche&amp;quot; - a doctrine established by [[Kim Il Sung]] and carried on by his son [[Kim Jong Il]] and after his death by the current leader [[Kim Jong-un]]. Although it is investing heavily in nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, extreme poverty on the verge of starvation is the fate of the people, who are very tightly controlled. The country has little to no electrical power at night outside the capital, which can be verified by looking at nighttime satellite photos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epod.usra.edu/archive/epodviewer.php3?oid=87488&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Venezuela===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Venezuelan-Garbage-Truck-640x480 (2).jpg|right|250px|thumb|[[Venezuela]]ns eating &amp;quot;Bernie Burgers&amp;quot; out of a garbage truck.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mediaite.com/online/video-of-venezuelans-eating-out-of-a-garbage-truck-led-maduro-to-walk-out-of-jorge-ramos-interview/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist policies of president-for-life Hugo Chavez have destroyed the economy of that oil-rich nation. In 2009, he seized the Venezuelan operations of U.S. based Cargill in order to tighten his grip on the shrinking food supply in his country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/venezuela/4938993/Venezuelas-Hugo-Chavez-tightens-state-control-of-food-amid-rocketing-inflation-and-food-shortages.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the death of Chavez, [[Nicolás Maduro]] continues his policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Countires===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Ortega]], the dictator of [[Nicaragua]], is a strong ally of Venezuela and Cuba. [[China]] and [[Vietnam]] have abolished the Socialist economy but are still governed by Communist parties. Other countries who are controlled by Socialist parties are [[Laos]], [[Angola]], [[Mozambique]] and [[Moldova]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes on Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
Comparative quotes are given from the top [[Left-wing]] - [[Socialist]] - [[National Socialist]] (a.k.a. [[Nazi]]) - [[Marxist]] - [[Communist]] leaders and their critics in order to better understand the commonality of the end result of their similar philosophy taken to its fruition by the [[big government]] [[welfare state]]-[[nanny state]]-[[police state]] by [[leftist]] [[globalist]]-[[statist]]-socialist-communists. For more examples, see [[Nazism and socialism]]. From these quotes one can see little difference between Socialists, Nazis, Communists, Marxists. Communist regimes killed 60 million in the 20th century through [[genocide]], according to [[Le Monde]] and more than 100 million people according to ''The Black Book of Communism''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from National Socialist's Adolph Hitler===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Then will come a [[National Socialism|National Socialist]] State tribunal; then will November, 1918, be expiated; then the [[mass murder|heads will roll]].&lt;br /&gt;
** testimony at a trial of German officers, Leipzig, in 1930.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We have to put a stop to the idea that it is a part of everybody's [[unalienable rights|civil rights]] to [[freedom of speech|say whatever he pleases]].&lt;br /&gt;
** transcript of a conversation (22 February 1942)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;National socialism is the determination to create a [[slave|new man]]. There will no longer exist any individual arbitrary [[free will|will]], nor realms in which the individual belongs to himself. The time of happiness as a private matter is over.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted in Joachim C. Fest (1974), ''Hitler''. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, p.&amp;amp;nbsp;533.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I have sympathy for Mr. [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt|Roosevelt]], because he marches straight toward his objectives over Congress, lobbies and bureaucracy.&amp;quot; Hitler went on to note that he was the sole leader in Europe who expressed &amp;quot;understanding of the methods and motives of President Roosevelt.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.fff.org/freedom/0795a.asp] ''New York Times'' 1934, quoted from John Toland: ''Adolf Hitler: The Definitive Biography''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quotes from National Socialist's Heinrich Himmler ===&lt;br /&gt;
From the Nazi party ([[National Socialism]]) [[SS]] leader [[Heinrich Himmler]]:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;In the course of history periods of capitalism and socialism alternate with one another; capitalism is the unnatural, socialism the natural [[economic system]]...The [[Nazi|National Socialists]] and the [[Communists|Red Front]] have the same aspirations. The [[Jew]]s falsified the Revolution in the form of [[Marxism]] and that failed to bring fulfillment.&amp;quot;—Speech in [[Potsdam]] (13 October 1926), quoted in Peter Longerich, Heinrich Himmler (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;92–93.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The best political weapon is the [[terrorism|weapon of terror]]. Cruelty commands respect. Men may hate us. But, we don't ask for their love; only for their fear.&amp;quot;—Quoted in &amp;quot;Visions of Reality - A Study of Abnormal Perception and Behavior&amp;quot; - by Alberto Rivas - Psychology - 2007 - Page 162&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quotes from Lenin ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Vladimir Lenin]] stated:&lt;br /&gt;
* “The way to crush the [[middle class]] is to grind them between the millstones of [[taxation]] and [[inflation]].”&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The best revolutionary is youth devoid of [[moral]]s.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;A lie told often enough becomes the truth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The goal of socialism is communism.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;There are no morals in [[politics]] there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Give us the child for 8 years and it will be a [[Bolshevik]] forever.&amp;quot; (see [[Public school values]] and [[Professor values]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Stalin===&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Darwin-Stalin connection'' describes the brutal [[Soviet]] dictator [[Josef Stalin]] who [[mass murder|murdered millions]] of people, giving credit to [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]]'s book for his outlook in life:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The death of one man is a tragedy, the [[mass murder|death of millions]] is a statistic.&amp;quot; ~ to [[Churchill]], 1945.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Death is the solution to all problems. No man - no problem&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Ideas are more powerful than [[guns]]. We would [[gun control|not let our enemies have guns]], why should we let them have ideas?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;It is enough that the people know there was an [[election]]. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The only real power comes out of a long [[rifle]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;When we hang the [[capitalist]]s they will sell us the rope we use.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Leon Trotsky===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Repression for the attainment of economic ends is a necessary weapon of the socialist [[dictatorship]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leon Trotsky]] in ''Terrorism and Communism : A Reply to Karl Kautsky'' (1920; 1975), p.&amp;amp;nbsp;153&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The road to socialism lies through a period of the highest possible intensification of the principle of the state … Just as a lamp, before going out, shoots up in a brilliant flame, so the state, before disappearing, assumes the form of the dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e., the most ruthless form of state, which embraces the life of the citizens authoritatively in every direction...&lt;br /&gt;
** ''Terrorism and Communism : A Reply to Karl Kautsky'' (1920; 1975), p. 177&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Leon Trotsky in his book The [[Russian Revolution]], 1930&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Root out the counterrevolutionaries without mercy, lock up suspicious characters in concentration camps... Shirkers will be [[extermination camp|shot]], regardless of past service.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Statement of 1918, as quoted in ''Trotsky : The Eternal Revolutionary'' (1996) by Dmitri Volkogonov, p.&amp;amp;nbsp;213&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Mao===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mao Zedong]], responsible for the deaths of 77 million [[Chinese]] states:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Every Communist must grasp the truth: Political power grows out of the barrel of a [[gun]].&amp;quot;—The [[Little Red Book]], 1964&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Our principle is that the [[Communist Party|Party]] commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes on Kim Il-sung===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Kim Il-sung]] took the communist [[cult of personality]] to a new level.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barbara Demick (2010) ''Nothing to Envy: Real Lives in North Korea'', Granta, page 45, ISBN 9781847081414&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In Korea, the Americans have far exceed the Hitlerites!&amp;quot;—by Kim Il-sung&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;**Kim Il-sung to the [[Swedish]] communist leader [[Frank Baude]] in 1993.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;When it comes to the orchestration of terror, Kim Jong-il is a natural born genius.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Kim Duk Hong]] quoted in ''[[BBC News]]'' (21 July 2003) &amp;quot;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent/3065101.stm Inside the mind of Kim Jong-il]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Pol Pot===&lt;br /&gt;
As ruler of [[Cambodia]] Pol Pot was responsible for [[mass murder|exterminating]] 2 million people by [[genocide]]. That's a quarter of the country's population:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Exterminate the 50 million [[Vietnamese]]... and purify the masses of the [[Cambodian]] people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Phnom Penh radio broadcast by [[Pol Pot]] of the [[Khmer Rouge]] (May 10, 1978) ([http://www.enotes.com/genocide-encyclopedia/khmer-rouge])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Related Quotes from Others===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[[Socialist]]s ignore the side of man that is of the spirit.  They can provide shelter, fill your belly with bacon and beans, treat you when you are ill, all the things that are guaranteed to a prisoner or a slave.  They don't understand that we dream - yes, even of some time owning a yacht.&amp;quot; -- [[President]] [[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9ut8fnmwVkwC&amp;amp;pg=PA91#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false|last1=Skinner|first1=Kiron K.|last2=Anderson|first2=Annelise A.|title=Stories in His Own Hand: The Everyday Wisdom of Ronald Reagan ; Edited with an Introduction and Commentary by Kiron K. Skinner, Annelise Anderson, Martin Anderson ; Foreword by George P. Shultz|date=2001|publisher=Simon and Schuster|isbn=9781416584506}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the [[income redistribution|equal sharing]] of misery.&amp;quot; -- [[Winston Churchill]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I've always doubted that the socialists had a leg to stand on intellectually&amp;quot; -- [[Friedrich Hayek]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The trouble is with socialism, which resembles a form of [[mental illness]] more than it does a philosophy&amp;quot; -- [[L. Neil Smith]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Socialists cry &amp;quot;Power to the people&amp;quot;, and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean — [[Nanny state|power over people]], [[Police state|power to the State]].&amp;quot; -- [[Margaret Thatcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;All socialism involves [[slavery]]&amp;quot; -- [[Herbert Spencer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Wonderful system, wrong species&amp;quot;—Edward O. Wilson; who believed that collectivism was better suited to an ant than a human.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/homo-consumericus/201101/communismsocialism-great-idea-wrong-species-e-o-wilson Communism/Socialism: “Great Idea. Wrong Species.” (E. O. Wilson)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to ''consolidate'' and ''control'' the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all.&amp;quot;—Gary Allen &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=UuKnhw27vUwC&amp;amp;q=%22if+one+understands+that+socialism+is+not+a%22&amp;amp;dq=%22if+one+understands+that+socialism+is+not+a%22&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0CDEQ6AEwBGoVChMI9b6puNfryAIVxSQmCh2CHw7j None Dare Call It Conspiracy], page 33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We face a hostile ideology; (Socialism i) global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose and insidous in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully there is call for not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of questions but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain despite every provocation on our charted course towards permanent peace and human betterment.&amp;quot; - Dwight D. Eisenhower, Farewell Address&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Big government]] [[Welfare state]] leads to [[socialist]] [[Nanny state]], leads to [[communist]] [[Police state]] - Don't think Socialism-Communism is incompatible with [[Islam]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control]] - key element to create a police state&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of atheist and agnostic pseudosciences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dictatorship]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dictatorship of the proletariat]]: [[Class warfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[List of Socialist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Single-party state]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mobocracy]], [[Social Effects of the Theory of Evolution]], [[Anti-Semitism]], [[Communist Racism]], [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nazi Party|National Socialist German Workers' Party]] (Nazi Party)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nazism and socialism]]: [[National Socialism]] - the Nazis were elitist [[Police state]] [[liberals]] not [[conservative]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Left-wing Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Resisting Socialist Landfills‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Champagne socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/33169-socialism-explained Socialism Explained], by Charles Scaliger of ''The New American''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/etexts/hayekintellectuals.pdf The Intellectuals and Socialism], By F.A. Hayek, ''The University of Chicago Law Review'', (Spring 1949), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;417–420, 421-423, 425-433. &lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109587/socialism Socialism] Encyclopædia Britannica.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/socialism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Socialism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.gotquestions.org/socialism-Christian.html How should a Christian view socialism?], by [[GotQuestions]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/socialism-poverty-democrats-standard-of-living/ You Can See America's Future Under Socialism, And It Isn't Pretty], ''Investor's Business Daily'', October 25, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tomroganthinks.com/2017/11/socialism-sucks.html?m=1 Socialism isn't good for you], Tom Rogan, November 23, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-eight-politics-how-the-devil-sows-chaos-part-i_2592414.html Chapter Eight: How Communism Sows Chaos in Politics (Part I)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-eight-politics-how-communism-sows-chaos-part-ii_2594599.html Chapter Eight: How Communism Sows Chaos in Politics (Part II)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-nine-the-communist-economic-trap-part-i_2596547.html Chapter Nine: The Communist Economic Trap (Part I)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-nine-the-communist-economic-trap-part-ii_2605465.html Chapter Nine: The Communist Economic Trap (Part II)], ''The Epoch Times'' (from ''How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World'').&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Busky, Donald F. ''Communism in History and Theory: From Utopian Socialism to the Fall of the Soviet Union'' (2002) [https://www.amazon.com/Communism-History-Theory-Utopian-Socialism/dp/027597748X/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-24 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dougherty, Jude P. &amp;quot;Socialist Man: A Psychological Profile,&amp;quot; ''Modern Age'' Volume 46, Number 1-2; Winter/Spring 2004 [http://www.mmisi.org/ma/46_1-2/dougherty.pdf online edition], a conservative critique&lt;br /&gt;
*Laslett, John, ed. ''Failure of a Dream: Essays in the History of American Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lindemann, Albert S. ''A History of European Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Gary Marks. ''It Didn't Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States'' (2001), Lipset was a leading conservative scholar [https://www.amazon.com/Didnt-Happen-Here-Socialism-Failed/dp/0393322548/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Malia, Martin. ''Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia'' (1995) [https://www.amazon.com/Soviet-Tragedy-History-Socialism-Russia/dp/0684823136/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761853&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Muravchik, Joshua. ''Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism'' (2003) by conservative historian [https://www.amazon.com/Heaven-Earth-Rise-Fall-Socialism/dp/1893554783/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Novak, Michael. ''Capitalism and Socialism: A Theological Inquiry '' (1988) [https://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Socialism-Theological-Michael-Novak/dp/0844721549/ref=sr_1_19?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-19 excerpt and text search], by leading conservative scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Nove, Alec. ''An Economic History of the USSR 1917-1991'' (3rd ed. 1993) &lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''Communism: A History'' (2003), by a leading conservative &lt;br /&gt;
* Suny, Ronald Grigor. ''The Soviet Experiment: Russia, the USSR, and the Successor States.'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24265044# online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist Terminology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Oppression]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Leftism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Police State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Welfare State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Man-Made Disasters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Threats]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Northwest&amp;diff=1646805</id>
		<title>User talk:Northwest</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Northwest&amp;diff=1646805"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T17:14:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 23:37, 18 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== same sex marriage revert? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings, and hope you are well. Just wanted to ask, why the revert of my same-sex marriage page edit?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:KatieKomori|KatieKomori]] 10:19, 1 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Vandal==&lt;br /&gt;
A vandal on the loose. [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Benkumar] I have told four other editors. If you are able, please block him[[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 02:34, 27 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you.  When I see an edit of minus five digits on a page like Republican Party, it's pretty obvious that a vandal swept by.  Well done. --[[User:Pious|Pious]] ([[User talk:Pious|talk]]) 22:18, 19 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Are you sure that was vandalism? It could have been an inadvertent removal of information when he intended on just adding &amp;quot;pro-capitalism&amp;quot; to the article. I have seen numerous times where this has happened, which an editor adding info but for whatever reason accidently removing a whole bunch of information without even knowing it, and in those other times, it was clearly a mistake. I honestly don't see how it was intentional. I request that you review your block. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:35, 19 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It turns out that user was a sock of TAR, and he was blocked by an admin (but for a different reason). Thank you for your work on this site, Northwest. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:43, 20 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Expansion of Greatest Conservative TV Shows and Greatest Conservative Movies/Worst Liberal Movies, as well as Star Wars. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed the great job you did in expanding the Worst Liberal TV Shows, and was wondering whether you are planning to do something similar regarding the Greatest Conservative TV Shows and the Greatest Conservative Movies/Worst Liberal Movies lists (namely the opening paragraphs).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, since I noticed you're doing a lot of edits regarding Star Wars currently, I was wondering whether you could expand it to include any real life influences on the characters and franchise. I know that the Empire was largely inspired by America during the time of the Vietnam War, and that the Rebel Alliance was based on the Vietcong (in fact, that's actually the reason why I'm, albeit reluctantly, an Empire supporter now, and probably full time as well). I included a bit regarding Palpatine being directly inspired by Richard Nixon, for example. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 08:53, 3 April 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
+==&lt;br /&gt;
Okay mate, that's enough! If you want to revert my edits then give me reasons that have more veracity than the weasel words you gave in the Summary of one of the pages.    &lt;br /&gt;
:I have reread the article(s), struggled through TAR's attached blogs, read your [[Northwest]] edit history and have realised you have no real understanding or knowledge of the words involved. Nor do you understand it is not advisable to link to non-existent pages which your reverts always do.&lt;br /&gt;
:I am about to revert... again! If you revert me without good reason I will ban you.&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 00:59, 13 April 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== re: Lenin quote in Bourgeoisie article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
re: [[Bourgeoisie]] article&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
AlanE is acting in good faith about the Lenin quote: http://www.azcentral.com/story/claythompson/2014/10/13/lenin-ronald-reagan-quotes/17226727/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to discuss the matter of the historicity of the quote with AlanE on the talk page of the article, here is a useful resource: [http://historiansgaze.blogspot.com/2009/10/7-habits-of-highly-effective-historians.html 7 habits of highly effective historians]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:31, 13 April 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== re: your note to me ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I respond to your email from me. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, I will write a note to AlanE.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:04, 13 April 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Princess and the Frog revert. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just writing because I'm not sure why you reverted the Princess and the Frog removal from Worst Liberal Movies.  The movie promoteshard work and family while condemning hedonism and nihilism and p k it's out the danger of accepting handouts and feeling entitled.  This seems to me to be a deeply conservative film. --[[User:Whizkid|Whizkid]] ([[User talk:Whizkid|talk]]) 07:47, 1 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evolution==&lt;br /&gt;
A simple question: do you believe in it, Creationism, or otherwise?--[[User:Pious|Pious]] ([[User talk:Pious|talk]]) 03:29, 23 August 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Account promoted==&lt;br /&gt;
Your account has just been given a promotion to 24x7 editing and blocking privileges.  Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:02, 6 March 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Congratulations! You do very good work on this wiki, which I appreciate. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:20, 6 March 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Congrats! Keep up the good work! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:55, 6 March 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Congratulations.  It is good working with you. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 03:36, 7 March 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==JohnZ==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Northwest, I changed your two-year block to 1 day for [[User:JohnZ]].  While I do not like profanity, I think that we should show a kind and understanding approach to users who have been around for years.  Let's give him a second chance, and if he does it again, then we would be justified in coming down hard.  This is a volunteer project, and CP wants to avoid a reputation of long-blocks-at-the-drop-of-a-hat.  Thank you for your understanding. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:57, 12 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==I like that==&lt;br /&gt;
Replace &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;ideology™. Because of certain legal issues the US will face in the future, I go out of my way never to refer the a certain collective entity as a &amp;quot;faith&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot;. &amp;quot; Political system&amp;quot; I use a lot, but haven't of thought of &amp;quot;ideology&amp;quot;. We should collect a whole basket of different terms that can be used, and always insert them wherever necessary. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:10, 2 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009.  It is now registered and somewhat set up.  I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel.  Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering.  In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later.  If you are interested, please let me know!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:36, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocking of User:Misslizzynj ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please don't block new users due to the name policy unless they have usernames that are obviously offensive or silly. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:58, 11 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Length of blocks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Northwest, Andy recently messaged me on my talk page and told me to refrain from using blocks longer than around six months because many people's IP addresses change by then. I see you changed the length of a block for an impersonator of you, and I am not going to challenge that, but please refrain from doing long blocks for non-serious vandalism, per what Andy told me. Thanks. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:37, 2 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trolls ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't feed them. Block them and move on. I would have emailed this to you, but you don't seem to have email activated. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 16:04, 27 October 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Just block trolls. Do not communicate with them.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:22, 27 October 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocking of User:Whizkid ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One comment, as blunt and rude as it may have been, is not enough to block a long-time editor for any amount of time. You should have warned him about making such comments first. Don't ever make such a block again.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I'm commenting here, you realize that the links [[Democrat Party]] and [[Democratic Party]] link to two different articles? I see that you're changing every link to &amp;quot;Democrat Party&amp;quot; (which I support, for the most part), but you're having every article link to a different article. Please change the links so they link to the actual article about the party, even if you pipe it so the reader sees &amp;quot;Democrat Party.&amp;quot; --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:32, 8 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was made clear to me when I was promoted to Assistant SysOp that this role is only for blocking blatant vandals, not working in good faith.  While I haven't carefully studied the issue, he was disputing your changes in good faith.  As [[Conservapedia:User_rights#Blocking_rights|officially stated]], only full administrators are to resolve disputes.  Just because you have the block button doesn't mean you should use it whenever someone disagrees.  In your defense, edit warring is discouraged, but it takes two to edit war.  If you are the one making a change, then it is reasonable to assume that the original version should take precedence until the dispute can be resolved.  Please discuss it with an administrator rather than just blocking someone.  Should he have kept reverting your changes? Probably not. Should you have kept forcing your change back in? Probably not.  Please take it to an admin next time, rather than just abusing the block button.  Thank you. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:28, 8 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::First of all, I apologize for being rude.  It was a fit of pique, brought on by my feeling you weren't paying any attention to what I was saying.  Still, it was inappropriate, and I don't believe you're vandalizing the site, or that you're attempting to be deceitful.  So I hope that you can forgive me and we can come to the understanding that, even if we disagree on things, we're both working for what we believe to be the good, and we should treat each other with respect and charity.  I hope we can agree on that much at least.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::That being said, I still strongly disagree with your position about this, and don't feel that it's ultimately good for the site, but I have no desire to get into an edit war with you that won't do anything but waste both our time.  So maybe we could agree to make our cases before an administrator or someone, for the sake of harmony, and get a decision on this.  Let me know what you think.--[[User:Whizkid|Whizkid]] ([[User talk:Whizkid|talk]]) 23:32, 8 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal Denial revert? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why did you do this?  We know that the ultimate goal of liberals is to do more than just censor Christianity in America.  A site made for American conservatives should be about politics as much as it is about religion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:MacTavish|MacTavish]] ([[User talk:MacTavish|talk]]) 16:44, 29 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please backup your recent edits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please try to either save a copy of your recent edits, or just refrain from editing for the next 24 hours or so. Conservapedia is changing web servers, and there is a risk that pages might be exported before you make the change, meaning your change will be lost. Thanks for understanding! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:56, 12 March 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Islam ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw you reverting my edits to the article on [[Islam]]. There is a belief system to Islam, but it's more about worshiping an ''ideology'' than any God or gods. Even so, the source cited says Islam &amp;quot;…is an amalgam of social, political and judicial systems '''as well as''' a belief system. It is neither one thing nor the other – Islam is unique.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Marijuana article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did you see that there was a talk page discussion on the marijuana article about the content in question? I recommend that you explain [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marijuana&amp;amp;curid=7524&amp;amp;diff=1412346&amp;amp;oldid=1412214 your reverting] there and reach an agreement with the other editors, and I strongly recommend that you leave an edit summary when you revert. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:35, 4 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Same, an edit summary would really be helpful there to clarify your intent. Did you read the Talk page discussion about how those portions of the lede undermine our argument? Please see [[Talk:Marijuana#Objections_to_presentation_of_lead]]. [[User:DavidLReyes|DavidLReyes]] ([[User talk:DavidLReyes|talk]]) 21:27, 4 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Discussing Christian Denominations on This Site ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am someone who believes very staunchly in the five solas. I think that Ephesians 2:8-9 indicates the validity of Sola Gratia and Sola Fide, John 14:6 for Solo Christo, and Psalm 115 for Sola Deo Gloria. I am not here to debate religious issues with you, but as you are a high-ranking admin on this site and Catholic, I have to ask you, what would you do if you saw edits to certain articles promoting a Protestant point of view? [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 12:58, 16 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My Ban ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I was banned for making edits that I thought were accurate on the Political Spectrum page under my account Classical Liberal. I didn't know how to contact you, so I created this page instead so I could. I'm really sorry. I'm a new user who just registered within the same hour of getting banned, I am a conservative, but I prefer that we take our title of being the liberals back, I'm not a troll, and I'm a student who's interested in politics and all I'm trying to do is inform people about modern conservatives so women and minorities aren't deceived anymore and will come back home to the Republican Party. I don't see how my edits were lies or revisionist history. I was just trying to inform people who wrongly accuse us of what the Democrats did like the Trail of Tears, slavery, secession, and segregation because they always claim whenever you tell them that the Democrats were responsible for all of it that that's when the Democrats were the conservative party because they think that the parties switched and since I learned that the word liberal was redefined in the 1930s, I also thought the word conservative was redefined as well and that classical conservatism meant modern liberalism now just like how classical liberalism means modern conservatism now.  I thought that I should've informed people that the conservatives of the past who the modern liberals pin the actions of on us modern conservatives were the modern liberals because the word liberal was hijacked from us and redefined and they like to accredit modern liberals for the things we classical liberals and modern conservatives actually did before the word liberalism was redefined. They'll argue with us conservatives and tell us that Lincoln would be a Democrat since he was a liberal because they don't realize that he was a liberal when the definitions of liberal and conservative were reversed. They believe the parties were reversed instead. I thought that since we were called the liberals in the past before they hijacked and redefined the term for themselves, they were called the conservatives because they're trying to pin the Trail of Tears, slavery, secession, and segregation on modern conservatives and blame us for it and insist that since Democrats are now called the liberals and Republicans are called the conservatives, that the parties switched rather than the definitions of liberal and conservative. I thought this was the correct explanation since liberals of today whenever you point out the Democrats' history say &amp;quot;that's when the Republicans were the liberals and the Democrats were the conservatives and Lincoln would be a Democrat today since the liberal party is the Democratic Party now.&amp;quot; They're unaware that when we were the liberal party, that the word liberal did not mean what it does now.  I was just trying to clear the confusion that the Democrats created up when they redefined the word liberal and hijacked it from us. I thought that since classical liberalism means what modern conservatism does, classical conservatism must've meant what modern liberalism does now because I thought that since we were called the liberals before the New Deal, that the Democrats must've been called the conservatives then because what else would that have made them if we were called the liberals before the New Deal and conservatives after? If we were called liberals prior to the New Deal, what were they called? Conservatives wanting to keep blacks enslaved and minorities and women oppressed who had a bad reputation and stole our term? And I thought that them stealing the term liberal from us and us having to call ourselves the conservatives instead of liberals which we used to be called was part of their plan to push the party switch myth 30 years later because we have the title of conservative and they have the title of liberal that they stole from us and I thought the Democrats did this to make it look like the parties switched instead of the titles and to make it look like they were the good guys since they're now called &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; instead and no longer us which we used to be called until they hijacked the term from us. I thought this was the best way to debunk the claim that modern conservatives of the Republican Party who used to be called liberals prior to the definition switch had anything to do with what the Democrats did in the past. I thought that if being a conservative meant what being a liberal meant before the word was redefined, that being a liberal meant what being a conservative meant because I thought that since the term liberal belonged to us at one time, the term conservative must've belonged to them and that if classical liberalism means modern conservatism, classical conservatism must mean modern liberalism. You see where I'm getting at? I thought that if the word liberal belonged to us at one time, the word conservative belonged to them if we were called the liberals because what is the opposite of liberal? Conservative. And I thought that since the word liberal had a different definition, the word conservative had a different definition too. So I'm sorry if I in your words inserted historical revisionism and lies. That was not my intent. My intent was to clear up confusion, not create it. I want people to stop accrediting modern liberals for what we did and stop claiming that we used to be the Democrats and that the Republicans used to be what Democrats are now which is not true. I'm new to all this and I'm a beginner. I'll probably need some help with editing. I'm still learning my history. History and philosophy and studying the Bible are my favorite things. I'm obsessed with politics. I'm really good at explaining things and I was just trying to help. You could've just let me know where you thought I was wrong instead of slapping a 2-year ban on me. If unbanned, from now on, I will verify with you the things I want to add to pages before I add them so this won't happen again. Please give me another chance. I'm only a guy in his late teens whose been into politics for 7 years now. I share your information with everyone I can and I've convinced many family members to become Republicans while even being disowned by several others which you could just imagine how that makes someone feel. Especially someone my age. {{unsigned|Modern Conservative}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I have unblocked the &amp;quot;Classical Liberal&amp;quot; account. I strongly recommend you first go to the article talk pages before making changes like this before unilaterally making them. Then, we can discuss those changes, which will be helpful. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:59, 11 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sissy punk site ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User_talk:DMorris/Archive_1#Sissy_punks|Per Jpatt and the late TK, I would try to avoid mentioning that vandal site at all, fair enough?]] [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 21:10, 24 March 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The atheist page has straw man arguments and generalisations against atheism like that atheism is a worldview. You cannot just delete and ban everybody that doesn't agree with you. The evolution page is full of inconsistencies too.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheist_mass_shooters&amp;diff=1646804</id>
		<title>Atheist mass shooters</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheist_mass_shooters&amp;diff=1646804"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T17:13:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Devin Patrick Kelley (2).jpg|thumbnail|200px|Atheist mass shooter [[Devin Patrick Kelley]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Atheism|atheist]] [[PZ Myers]], quoting fellow [[leftism|leftist]] Alex Nichols, said that jibes associating outspoken atheists with neckbeards (among other things) caused many [[liberal]]s/leftists to leave the atheist tent and those who remained for the most part lacked in social skills and self-awareness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2017/10/17/poisoning-of-a-movement/ Poisoning of a movement] by PZ Myers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  See also: [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence|Atheism and social skills]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FBI]] has performed some preliminary research on the [[psychology]] of mass shooters: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzpIJtRJLTE FBI on psychology of mass shooters] and [https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have been a significant amount of [[Atheism|atheists]] who have been mass shooters (see: [[List of atheist shooters and serial killers]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Stott in his 2018 ''Daily Caller'' article entitled ''What Is The Religion Of Mass Public Shooters?'' wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Just 16 percent have any type of religious affiliation at the time of their attacks, with a slight majority of those being Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over just over 20 years from the beginning of January 1998 through today, there have been 69 killers committing 66 mass public shootings in the United States where at least four people have been killed. Of those attacks, just four have been identified as Christians, with just three clearly regular churchgoers. With 70 percent of Americans identifying themselves as Christians and over 33 percent going to church at least once a week, those numbers are a long way away from the 48 or 23 we would respectively expect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2018/05/26/religion-of-mass-public-shooters/ ''What Is The Religion Of Mass Public Shooters?''] by John Stott, ''Daily Caller'', 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone else was either explicitly identified as no religious affiliation or that family and friends could not identify them as religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2018/05/26/religion-of-mass-public-shooters/ ''What Is The Religion Of Mass Public Shooters?''] by John Stott, ''Daily Caller'', 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheists and psychological factors related to mass shooters ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheists and psychological factors related to mass shooters]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mass shooters often have these characteristics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1.'''  Frequently are [[sociopathy|sociopaths]] or have [[psychopath]]ic tendencies (see: [[Atheism and sociopathy]] and [[Atheism and psychopathy]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/15/inside-the-mind-of-nikolas-cruz-and-other-mass-school-shooters.html Inside the mind of Nikolas Cruz and other mass school shooters], CNBC.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/serial-killers/serials-killers-vs-mass-murderers/ Serial Killers vs. Mass Murderers], CrimeMuseum.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2.''' Most mass shooters are men. Of the 62 cases of American mass shooters from 1982-2012, one of them was a woman.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/mass-shootings-map/ A Guide to Mass Shootings in America], Mother Jones, 2019&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The majority of atheists are men (see: [[Atheism and women]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3.''' Tend to be proud, narcissists who crave attention (see: [[Atheism and arrogance]] and [[Atheism and narcissism]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culture-shrink/201510/american-narcissism-and-mass-shooters American Narcissism and Mass Shooters], Psychology Today&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzpIJtRJLTE FBI on psychology of mass shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4.''' Many are loners (see: [[Atheism and loneliness]] and [[Atheism and social outcasts]] and [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence]] and [[Atheism and marriage]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/serial-killers/serials-killers-vs-mass-murderers/ Serial Killers vs. Mass Murderers], CrimeMuseum.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5.''' Many have interpersonal conflicts with family, friends, and colleagues at work or school (see: [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence]] and [[Atheist factions]])&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6.''' Often have substance abuse problems (See: [[Atheism and alcoholism]] and [[Atheism and drug addiction]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7.''' Most mass shooters have mental illness (see: [[Atheism and mental illness]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-duwe-rocque-mass-shootings-mental-illness-20180223-story.html Op-Ed: Actually, there is a clear link between mass shootings and mental illness] by GRANT DUWE AND MICHAEL ROCQUE, ''Los Angeles Times'', 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''8.''' Often kill themselves or engage in &amp;quot;death by cop&amp;quot; (see: [[Atheism and suicide]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzpIJtRJLTE FBI on psychology of mass shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''9.''' Frequently tend to kill out of revenge/bitterness/unforgiveness/anger (see: [[Atheism and bitterness]] and [[Atheism and forgiveness|Atheism and unforgiveness]] and [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and love]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/evil-deeds/201110/anger-rage-and-pathological-embitterment-what-motivates-mass-murders Anger, Rage and Pathological Embitterment: What Motivates Mass Murders?] by Stephen A. Diamond Ph.D., Psychology Today&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''10.''' Often have poor emotional control (see: [[Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''11.''' Frequently are very unhappy people (see: [[Atheism and happiness]] and [[Atheism and depression]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/15/inside-the-mind-of-nikolas-cruz-and-other-mass-school-shooters.html Inside the mind of Nikolas Cruz and other mass school shooters], CNBC.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''12.''' Many mass shooters are disgruntled people with a sense of entitlement (see: [[Atheism and gratitude]] and [[Atheism and envy]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culture-shrink/201510/american-narcissism-and-mass-shooters American Narcissism and Mass Shooters], Psychology Today&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/serial-killers/serials-killers-vs-mass-murderers/ Serial Killers vs. Mass Murderers], CrimeMuseum.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''13.''' Most come from fatherless homes (see: [[Atheism and illegitimate births]] and [[Atheism and divorce]] and [[Atheism and poor relationships with parents]] and [[Psychology of atheism]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.crisismagazine.com/2018/fatherless-shooters-clarification-data Shootings and Fatherlessness: A Clarification on the Data], Crisis Magazine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''14.''' Mass shooters often see violence as the only answer (see: [[Atheism and violence]] and [[Irreligion and domestic violence]] and [[Atheism and Mass Murder|Atheism and mass murder]] and [[Atheist atrocities]] and [[Atheism and human rights violations]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.therichest.com/rich-list/most-shocking/11-shocking-common-traits-of-mass-shooters/ 11 Shocking Common Traits Of Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''15.''' According to ''Business Insider'': &amp;quot;According to the nonprofit [https://everytownresearch.org/reports/mass-shootings-analysis/ Everytown for Gun Safety], the majority of mass shootings in the US are in some way related to domestic or family violence. A 2018 [https://everytownresearch.org/reports/mass-shootings-analysis/Everytown Everytown report] indicates that in at least 54% of mass shootings, the perpetrator also shot a current or former intimate partner or family member.&amp;quot; (see: [[Irreligion and domestic violence]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.businessinsider.com/deadliest-mass-shootings-almost-all-have-domestic-violence-connection-2017-11 The men behind the US's deadliest mass shootings have domestic violence — not mental illness — in common], ''Business Insider''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''16.''' A little over third of the adult mass shooters had prior criminal convictions (see: [[Irreligious prison population]] and [[Religion and crime reduction]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''17.''' Often have health concerns which acts as a stressor in their lives (see: [[Atheism and health]] and [[Irreligion and recovery from illnesses]] and [[Atheism and life expectancy]])&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''18.''' Many are active on the internet and frequently it is found that they have posted disturbing things on [[social media]] and/or other websites (see: [[Internet atheism]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study entitled ''Mass Shootings and Media Contagion Theory: Social Media’s Influence on Frequency of Incidents'' published by Kristina J. Lee at Elon University indicates:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This study suggests that there is a pattern between the spread of mass shooting news on social media platforms and the increase in these crimes. Over time, as social media has increased in usage, so has the coverage of news concerning mass shootings. This also further reflects shooters’ desire for fame and their tendency to copy a crime. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidence from this study reveals a large increase in the number of mass shootings after 2011’s social media milestones, and one can conclude that social media most likely has some effect on these crimes, although the degree of this relationship is beyond the scope of this study.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.elon.edu/u/academics/communications/journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/153/2018/12/03-Lee.pdf ''Mass Shootings and Media Contagion Theory: Social Media’s Influence on Frequency of Incidents''] by Kristina J. Lee at Elon University&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Young mass murderers and atheism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Young mass murderers]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A significant portion of the recent incidents involving [[young mass murders|young mass murderers]] have involved atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irreligion, psychopathy, crime, violence and antisocial behavior]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and its anti-civilizational effects]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and Mass Murder|Atheism and mass murder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and morality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Atheism]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Violence]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheist_mass_shooters&amp;diff=1646803</id>
		<title>Atheist mass shooters</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Atheist_mass_shooters&amp;diff=1646803"/>
		<updated>2020-05-14T17:12:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ospin2: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Devin Patrick Kelley (2).jpg|thumbnail|200px|Atheist mass shooter [[Devin Patrick Kelley]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Atheism|atheist]] [[PZ Myers]], quoting fellow [[leftism|leftist]] Alex Nichols, said that jibes associating outspoken atheists with neckbeards (among other things) caused many [[liberal]]s/leftists to leave the atheist tent and those who remained for the most part lacked in social skills and self-awareness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2017/10/17/poisoning-of-a-movement/ Poisoning of a movement] by PZ Myers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  See also: [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence|Atheism and social skills]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[FBI]] has performed some preliminary research on the [[psychology]] of mass shooters: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzpIJtRJLTE FBI on psychology of mass shooters] and [https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have been a significant amount of [[Atheism|atheists]] who have been mass shooters (see: [[List of atheist shooters and serial killers]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Stott in his 2018 ''Daily Caller'' article entitled ''What Is The Religion Of Mass Public Shooters?'' wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Just 16 percent have any type of religious affiliation at the time of their attacks, with a slight majority of those being Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over just over 20 years from the beginning of January 1998 through today, there have been 69 killers committing 66 mass public shootings in the United States where at least four people have been killed. Of those attacks, just four have been identified as Christians, with just three clearly regular churchgoers. With 70 percent of Americans identifying themselves as Christians and over 33 percent going to church at least once a week, those numbers are a long way away from the 48 or 23 we would respectively expect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2018/05/26/religion-of-mass-public-shooters/ ''What Is The Religion Of Mass Public Shooters?''] by John Stott, ''Daily Caller'', 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Everyone else was either explicitly identified as no religious affiliation or that family and friends could not identify them as religious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2018/05/26/religion-of-mass-public-shooters/ ''What Is The Religion Of Mass Public Shooters?''] by John Stott, ''Daily Caller'', 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheists and psychological factors related to mass shooters ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheists and psychological factors related to mass shooters]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mass shooters often have these characteristics:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1.'''  Frequently are [[sociopathy|sociopaths]] or have [[psychopath]]ic tendencies (see: [[Atheism and sociopathy]] and [[Atheism and psychopathy]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/15/inside-the-mind-of-nikolas-cruz-and-other-mass-school-shooters.html Inside the mind of Nikolas Cruz and other mass school shooters], CNBC.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/serial-killers/serials-killers-vs-mass-murderers/ Serial Killers vs. Mass Murderers], CrimeMuseum.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2.''' Most mass shooters are men. Of the 62 cases of American mass shooters from 1982-2012, one of them was a woman.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/07/mass-shootings-map/ A Guide to Mass Shootings in America], Mother Jones, 2019&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The majority of atheists are men (see: [[Atheism and women]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3.''' Tend to be proud, narcissists who crave attention (see: [[Atheism and arrogance]] and [[Atheism and narcissism]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culture-shrink/201510/american-narcissism-and-mass-shooters American Narcissism and Mass Shooters], Psychology Today&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzpIJtRJLTE FBI on psychology of mass shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4.''' Many are loners (see: [[Atheism and loneliness]] and [[Atheism and social outcasts]] and [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence]] and [[Atheism and marriage]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/serial-killers/serials-killers-vs-mass-murderers/ Serial Killers vs. Mass Murderers], CrimeMuseum.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5.''' Many have interpersonal conflicts with family, friends, and colleagues at work or school (see: [[Atheism and social/interpersonal intelligence]] and [[Atheist factions]])&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''6.''' Often have substance abuse problems (See: [[Atheism and alcoholism]] and [[Atheism and drug addiction]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''7.''' Most mass shooters have mental illness (see: [[Atheism and mental illness]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-duwe-rocque-mass-shootings-mental-illness-20180223-story.html Op-Ed: Actually, there is a clear link between mass shootings and mental illness] by GRANT DUWE AND MICHAEL ROCQUE, ''Los Angeles Times'', 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''8.''' Often kill themselves or engage in &amp;quot;death by cop&amp;quot; (see: [[Atheism and suicide]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzpIJtRJLTE FBI on psychology of mass shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''9.''' Frequently tend to kill out of revenge/bitterness/unforgiveness/anger (see: [[Atheism and bitterness]] and [[Atheism and forgiveness|Atheism and unforgiveness]] and [[Atheism and anger]] and [[Atheism and love]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/evil-deeds/201110/anger-rage-and-pathological-embitterment-what-motivates-mass-murders Anger, Rage and Pathological Embitterment: What Motivates Mass Murders?] by Stephen A. Diamond Ph.D., Psychology Today&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''10.''' Often have poor emotional control (see: [[Atheism and negative emotions/thoughts]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''11.''' Frequently are very unhappy people (see: [[Atheism and happiness]] and [[Atheism and depression]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnbc.com/2018/02/15/inside-the-mind-of-nikolas-cruz-and-other-mass-school-shooters.html Inside the mind of Nikolas Cruz and other mass school shooters], CNBC.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''12.''' Many mass shooters are disgruntled people with a sense of entitlement (see: [[Atheism and gratitude]] and [[Atheism and envy]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/culture-shrink/201510/american-narcissism-and-mass-shooters American Narcissism and Mass Shooters], Psychology Today&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/serial-killers/serials-killers-vs-mass-murderers/ Serial Killers vs. Mass Murderers], CrimeMuseum.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''13.''' Most come from fatherless homes (see: [[Atheism and illegitimate births]] and [[Atheism and divorce]] and [[Atheism and poor relationships with parents]] and [[Psychology of atheism]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.crisismagazine.com/2018/fatherless-shooters-clarification-data Shootings and Fatherlessness: A Clarification on the Data], Crisis Magazine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''14.''' Mass shooters often see violence as the only answer (see: [[Atheism and violence]] and [[Irreligion and domestic violence]] and [[Atheism and Mass Murder|Atheism and mass murder]] and [[Atheist atrocities]] and [[Atheism and human rights violations]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.therichest.com/rich-list/most-shocking/11-shocking-common-traits-of-mass-shooters/ 11 Shocking Common Traits Of Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''15.''' According to ''Business Insider'': &amp;quot;According to the nonprofit [https://everytownresearch.org/reports/mass-shootings-analysis/ Everytown for Gun Safety], the majority of mass shootings in the US are in some way related to domestic or family violence. A 2018 [https://everytownresearch.org/reports/mass-shootings-analysis/Everytown Everytown report] indicates that in at least 54% of mass shootings, the perpetrator also shot a current or former intimate partner or family member.&amp;quot; (see: [[Irreligion and domestic violence]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.businessinsider.com/deadliest-mass-shootings-almost-all-have-domestic-violence-connection-2017-11 The men behind the US's deadliest mass shootings have domestic violence — not mental illness — in common], ''Business Insider''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''16.''' A little over third of the adult mass shooters had prior criminal convictions (see: [[Irreligious prison population]] and [[Religion and crime reduction]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''17.''' Often have health concerns which acts as a stressor in their lives (see: [[Atheism and health]] and [[Irreligion and recovery from illnesses]] and [[Atheism and life expectancy]])&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/news/fbi-study-identifies-warning-signs-of-future-mass-shooters-_5dqHxwP80CM-fKXsvx7WQ/ FBI Study Identifies Warning Signs Of Future Mass Shooters]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''18.''' Many are active on the internet and frequently it is found that they have posted disturbing things on [[social media]] and/or other websites (see: [[Internet atheism]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study entitled ''Mass Shootings and Media Contagion Theory: Social Media’s Influence on Frequency of Incidents'' published by Kristina J. Lee at Elon University indicates:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This study suggests that there is a pattern between the spread of mass shooting news on social media platforms and the increase in these crimes. Over time, as social media has increased in usage, so has the coverage of news concerning mass shootings. This also further reflects shooters’ desire for fame and their tendency to copy a crime. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidence from this study reveals a large increase in the number of mass shootings after 2011’s social media milestones, and one can conclude that social media most likely has some effect on these crimes, although the degree of this relationship is beyond the scope of this study.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.elon.edu/u/academics/communications/journal/wp-content/uploads/sites/153/2018/12/03-Lee.pdf ''Mass Shootings and Media Contagion Theory: Social Media’s Influence on Frequency of Incidents''] by Kristina J. Lee at Elon University&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Young mass murderers and atheism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Young mass murderers]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A significant portion of the recent incidents involving [[young mass murders|young mass murderers]] have involved atheists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irreligion, psychopathy, crime, violence and antisocial behavior]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and its anti-civilizational effects]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and Mass Murder|Atheism and mass murder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and morality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Atheism]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Violence]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ospin2</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>