<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Orb</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Orb"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Orb"/>
	<updated>2026-10-26T14:20:49Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russiagate:_The_Empire_Strikes_Back&amp;diff=1589181</id>
		<title>Russiagate: The Empire Strikes Back</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Russiagate:_The_Empire_Strikes_Back&amp;diff=1589181"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:48:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Simplifying page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This page chronicles the '''[[Obama Spygate]]''' scandal and is updated regularly;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;see also '''[[Ukrainian collusion]]''' and '''[[Deep State coup 2.0]]''' for updates; please link back as the story unfolds.''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mifsud with Boris Johnson.jpeg|right|350px|thumb|'''FBI/CIA spy [[Joseph Mifsud]] (left) with [[UK]] prime minister [[Boris Johnson]] (center)''' two weeks after Trump advisor '''[[George Papadopoulos]]'''' plea agreement in the '''[[Mueller investigation]]'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.eu/article/boris-johnson-pictured-with-london-professor-from-fbi-russia-probe/amp/ &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The entire [[Trump-Russia conspiracy hoax]] was hatched by [[Obama administration|Obama]] CIA director [[John Brennan]] on the false allegation that Mifsud was a Russian spy.  Mifsud had been working for Brennan and [[Jimmy the Weasel]] Comey all along.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUZ8XI_ncas Why the Mifsud Story Matters], DECLASSIFIED with Gina Shakespeare,- ''[[The Epoch Times]]'', Aug 5, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''[[Muellergate scandal]]''' refers to efforts to cover-up Obama-era [[FBI]]/[[DOJ]] crimes and frame [[Donald Trump]] and campaign associates for crimes they did not commit, and later [[Deep State coup]] plot that involved members of the U.S. [[Senate Select Committee on Intelligence]], as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since President Trump's inauguration, 26 people were fired or otherwise removed from the [[Department of Justice]] and [[FBI]] in the [[Obamagate timeline|Obamagate scandal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FBI Deputy Director [[Andrew McCabe]] and FBI chief legal counsel [[James Baker (DOJ)]] selected most of the special counsel investigators; those two then recommended to Deputy AG [[Rod Rosenstein]] that he hire [[Robert Mueller]] as special counsel lead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[James Comey]] was fired. The remaining ‘at-risk’ [[corrupt]] [[FBI]] leadership (McCabe and Baker) selected the “small group”; then Mueller was selected and brought on his additional team members. The entire  purpose of the special counsel operation was to cover-up the DOJ/FBI activity during the [[2016 presidential election]], [[Trump transition]], and early [[Trump administration]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While DOJ Inspector General [[Michael Horowitz]] completed his review of the FBI mishandling of the [[Clinton email investigation]], Horowitz was prevented from looking at any of the prime suspects in the [[FISA abuse]] scandal. As was U.S. Attorney John Huber from prosecuting anyone involved. Mueller's ongoing investigation gave cover to corrupt Obama era officials, citing Mueller's &amp;quot;ongoing investigation.&amp;quot; They successfully impeded investigations throughout the 2017-2019 Congressional session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2009-2014 Vanguardism ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See : '''[[Obamagate timeline 2009-2014]]'''''&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Leftist]]  [[totalitarian]]  [[fascism]].&lt;br /&gt;
In the Spring of 2017 Chief [[FISA Court]] Judge Rosemary Collyer found that the [[Obama administration]] had been abusing the NSA FISA 702 database since President Obama's re-election in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FISA 702 database consists of US Persons - American citizens residing inside or outside the United States, as well as non-citizens visiting or residing in the United States who are afforded [[Fourth Amendment]] protection from unlawful searches. FISA 702 database queries are strictly regulated. US Persons can sometimes be caught up in surveillance activities of foreign agents, terrorists, and criminal gangs while not being the target. Their names are to be masked in reports circulated within the government. The Obama administration targeted thousands of US persons - American citizens mostly - without [[probable cause]] for a period of more than four years. Judge Collyer found that these victims unmasked names and personal information (phone contacts, email, texts, banking and any other electronic information) was funneled to outside contractors - internet firms and opposition researchers, likely [[Crowdstrike]], [[FusionGPS]] and others. The victims of Obama civil rights abuses were targeted as part of a program of opposition political research. [[Robert Mueller]] was the FBI director at the time the massive violation of American citizen's [[Constitutional rights]] began.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama implemented the very system of an oppressive [[police state]] that Obama later argued made [[Vladimir Putin]] so evil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== IRS scandal ===&lt;br /&gt;
: {{Main article|IRS scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010 [[Eric Holder]] asked the IRS to send him the records of 501(c) non profit groups and individuals representing conservative voters. Lois Lerner sent the DOJ 1.1 million pages of 501(c)(4) tax filing data. Including a very specific set of “33 Schedule B attachment files”. The Schedule B's were specific to Large Conservative 501(c)(4) groups operating and organized to oppose the agenda of President Obama. The Schedule B's include the donor lists of specific people and sub-groups attached to the 501(c)(4). {{quotebox|The IRS sent the FBI “21 disks constituting a 1.1 million page database of information from 501(c)(4) tax exempt organizations, to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.” The transaction occurred in October 2010.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2012 Eric Holder authorized the use of government databases to search records of Americans and assemble “files” on potential targets. “The agency has new authority to keep data about innocent U.S. citizens for up to five years, and to analyze it for suspicious patterns of behavior.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the period of 2012 through April 2016, According to FISA Judge Rosemary Collyer, there were tens of thousands of illegal (“non-compliant”) search queries of the NSA database targeting Americans.  The search results were unlawfully “extracted” to unknown entities. Eighty-five out of every hundred searches were illegal (85% non-compliant rate).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consider purposeful actions, as a political targeting operation, by weaponizing the systems of government. Steps:&lt;br /&gt;
* First, identify the targets (IRS Database).&lt;br /&gt;
* Second, research the targets (NSA Database).&lt;br /&gt;
* Third assemble files on the targets (DOJ Authorization).&lt;br /&gt;
* Fourth use the files to leverage/destroy your opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Uranium One ===&lt;br /&gt;
: {{Main article|Uranium One scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Clinton family took $500,000 in personal bribes to transfer 20% of US uranium reserves to Russia. Hillary Clinton and Robert Mueller had to approve the deal. Mueller, [[Rod Rosenstein]], and [[Andrew Weissmann]] were involved in the cover-up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Arab Spring===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Arab Spring}}&lt;br /&gt;
By 2016, Gen. [[Michael Flynn]]’s knowledge as [[DIA]] director of the factual backstory to the [[Benghazi massacre]], the arming of [[ISIS]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/policy/defense/364917-study-shows-us-weapons-given-to-syrian-rebels-ended-up-in-isiss-hands&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and how the Obama/Clinton team misled everyone was the risk to the [[Deep state]] that Flynn represented.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/12/29/why-flynn-a-confluence-of-highly-charged-political-events/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Obama war crimes===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:C9Pak4-W0AIldKy (1).jpg|right|350px|thumb|Jake Sullivan&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.defenddemocracy.org/a-conversation-with-jake-sullivan-video/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to Hillary Clinton: &amp;quot;Al Qaeda is on our side.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obama war crimes}}&lt;br /&gt;
Illegal interventions in [[Libya]], [[Syria]], and the [[Ukrainian crisis|Ukrainian coup]].&lt;br /&gt;
====Obama authorizes covert aid to al Qaeda====&lt;br /&gt;
*'''31 March 2012.''' [[Reuters]] reports &amp;quot;President Barack Obama has signed a secret order authorizing covert U.S. government support for rebel forces seeking to oust Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi...Obama signed the order, known as a presidential &amp;quot;finding&amp;quot;, within the last two or three weeks&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reuters.com/article/us-libya-usa-order-idustre72t6h220110331&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Responsibility to carry out the aid is given to the State Dept. (Clinton) and CIA (Brennan); Pentagon (DIA and Gen. Michael Flynn are out of the loop).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Another ''Reuters'' article notes Obama had CIA personal on the ground ''before'' signing the finding, and Adm. Mike Mullen figured there were only about 1,000 rebels in number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reuters.com/article/us-libya-usa-rebels-idUSTRE72U7NM20110331&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Flynn memo on Islamic State====&lt;br /&gt;
*'''1 August 2012.''' ''Reuters'' reports Obama issued a secret Presidential Finding earlier in the year authorising transfer of captured weapons from Libya to Syria.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20170216061621/https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/01/obama-secret-syria-order_n_1730712.html?tw_p=twt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;under provisions of the presidential finding, the United States was collaborating with a secret command center operated by Turkey and its allies.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last week, Reuters reported that, along with [[Saudi Arabia]] and Qatar, Turkey had '''established a secret base near the Syrian border to help direct vital military and communications support to Assad’s opponents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This “nerve center” is in Adana, a city in southern Turkey about 60 miles (100 km) from the Syrian border, which is also home to Incirlik, a U.S. air base where U.S. military and intelligence agencies maintain a substantial presence.'''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turkey’s moderate Islamist government has been demanding Assad’s departure with growing vehemence. Turkish authorities are said by current and former U.S. government officials to be increasingly involved in providing Syrian rebels with training and possibly equipment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
European government sources said wealthy families in Saudi Arabia and Qatar were providing significant financing to the rebels. Senior officials of the Saudi and Qatari governments have publicly called for Assad’s departure.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Amb. [[Christopher Stevens]] put in charge of the covert operation. The aim is to arm jihadist groups which transformed themselves into the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria to overthrow [[Bashar al Assad]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:800px-Defense.gov photo essay 120724-D-BW835-236.jpg|right|275px|thumb|DIA director Gen. Michael Flynn exposed the Obama, Clinton, and Brennan secret covert aid to the Islamic State to the Pentagon and other members of the intelligence community,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/08/09/the-benghazi-brief-the-entire-story-of-operation-zero-footprint-in-libya-and-why-further-committee-hearings-are-futile/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was fired, went to work for the [[2016 Trump campaign|Trump campaign]], and became the target and victim of a vendetta.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''12 August 2012.''' [[Defense Intelligence Agency]] document circulated widely among government agencies, including [[CENTCOM]], the CIA, FBI, [[DHS]], NGA (National Geospacial Agency), State Dept., and many others. The document states the West (NATO powers), members of the Gulf Cooperation Council ([[Bahrain]], [[Kuwait]], [[Oman]], Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the [[United Arab Emirates]]), and [[Turkey]] want an [[Islamic State]] (&amp;quot;Salafist principality in Eastern Syria&amp;quot;) to oppose the regime of [[Bashar al-Assad]].&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|AQI [al Qaeda in Iraq] SUPPORTED THE SYRIAN OPPOSITION FROM THE BEGINNING, BOTH IDEOLOGICALLY AND THROUGH THE MEDIA…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... AFTER THE RISE OF THE INSURGENCY IN SYRIA, THE RELIGIOUS AND TRIBAL POWERS IN THE REGIONS BEGAN TO SYMPATHIZE WITH THE SECTARIAN UPRISING. THIS (SYMPATHY) APPEARED IN FRIDAY PRAYER SERMONS, WHICH CALLED FOR VOLUNTEERS TO SUPPORT THE SUNNIS IN SYRIA...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
THE FUTURE ASSUMPTIONS OF THE CRISIS:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...DEVELOPMENT OF THE CURRENT EVENTS INTO PROXY WAR: …OPPOSITION FORCES ARE TRYING TO CONTROL THE EASTERN AREAS (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN IRAQI PROVINCES (MOSUL AND ANBAR), IN ADDITION TO NEIGHBORING TURKISH BORDERS. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''WESTERN COUNTRIES, THE GULF STATES AND TURKEY ARE SUPPORTING THESE EFFORTS.''' ...'''SIMILAR TO WHAT TRANSPIRED IN LIBYA WHEN BENGHAZI WAS CHOSEN AS THE COMMAND CENTER''' OF THE TEMPORARY GOVERNMENT...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...THE WEST, GULF COUNTRIES, AND TURKEY SUPPORT THE [SYRIAN] OPPOSITION… THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY OF ESTABLISHING A '''DECLARED OR UNDECLARED [[Salafi|SALAFIST]] PRINCIPALITY IN EASTERN SYRIA''' (HASAKA AND DER ZOR), AND THIS IS '''EXACTLY WHAT THE SUPPORTING POWERS TO THE OPPOSITION WANT''', IN ORDER TO ISOLATE THE SYRIAN REGIME…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
…ISI COULD ALSO '''DECLARE AN ISLAMIC STATE THROUGH ITS UNION WITH OTHER TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA'''...}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Gen. [[Michael T. Flynn]] had been Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency for about three weeks. Flynn opposed the creation of the Islamic State. After it was declared in June 2014, Flynn was fired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''30 April 2014.''' [[James Clapper]] fires [[Defense Intelligence Agency]] Chief Mike Flynn for warning of radical [[Islamic]] [[jihad]]ists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/head-of-pentagon-intelligence-agency-forced-out-officials-say/2014/04/30/ec15a366-d09d-11e3-9e25-188ebe1fa93b_story.html?utm_term=.45a637102303&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;newsmax.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/michael-flynn-isis-memoir/2016/07/10/id/737937/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''9 June 2014.''' [[Islamic State]] captures Mosul;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/11/mosul-isis-gunmen-middle-east-states Iraq army capitulates to Isis militants in four cities | World news | The Guardian]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama calls ISIS &amp;quot;the Junior Varsity team.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/-wCqcWDZOjE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2015 Progressive police state==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pjimage-115-600x338 (1).jpg|right|350px|thumb|Coup operatives [[Sally Yates]] (left) and Andrew Weissmann (right).]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''See : '''[[Obamagate timeline 2015 Progressive police state]]'''''&lt;br /&gt;
The origins of intelligence lures, FBI [[provocateur]]s or Spygate. [[Sally Yates]] terminates independent Inspector General oversight of the [[DOJ]]-National Security Division. [[Nellie Ohr]] hired as an FBI contractor to begin illegal [[FISA]] 702 surveillance on [[Michael Cohen]] and others. [[Papadopoulos]] set up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comey gives immunity to Clinton cronies who destroyed evidence under Congressional [[subpoena]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Clinton email scandal===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Hillary Clinton email scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
*'''25 March 2015.''' According to the FBI, employees at Platte River Networks, which managed Clinton's server after it was removed from her basement, “held a conference call with [[President Clinton]]’s staff.” The FBI reports that a PRN staffer “sometime between March 25–31, 2015 deleted the Clinton archive mailbox from the PRN server” with BleachBit.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/09/hillary-clinton-obstruction-of-justice-email-server-deletion-was-crime/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''16 May 2016.''' '''Comey spends morning at White House; &amp;quot;extreme carelessness&amp;quot; replaces &amp;quot;gross negligence&amp;quot; by afternoon.''' FBI Dir. James Comey meets with [[President Obama]] in the White House;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/katica-2.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by afternoon Comey's revised draft memo is circulating among FBI leadership, Comey, Andrew McCabe, [[Bill Priestap]], Peter Strzok, [[James Rybicki]], [[Johnathan Moffa]], James Baker, [[Trisha Anderson]], David Bowdich and several other redacted names.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://vault.fbi.gov/drafts-of-director-comeys-july-5-2016-statement-regarding-email-server-investigation/Drafts%20of%20Director%20Comeys%20July%205%2C%202016%20Statement%20Regarding%20Email%20Server%20Investigation%20Part%2001%20of%2001/view Drafts of Director Comeys July 5, 2016 Statement Regarding Email Server Investigation Part 01 of 01], FBI Records: The Vault.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thegatewaypundit.com/2017/12/386625/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===FBI scandal (Spygate)===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|FBI scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====December 2015 - April 2016====&lt;br /&gt;
Sundance of the conservativetreehouse.com summarizes: &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;brown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The first phase leading into ‘Spygate’ is the period of time where opposition research of the Republican candidate field was taking place.  It is in this period where Fusion-GPS hired CIA Open Source researcher [[Nellie Ohr]], wife of DOJ-NSD official Bruce Ohr, to do research.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In the background of this time period the FBI and NSA database was being exploited by unknown FBI contractors; it is highly suspected that Nellie Ohr and/or [[Fusion-GPS]] was one of those contracted agencies with access to the massive electronic and metadata files.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nellie Ohr performed illegal FISA 702 searches on [[Donald Trump, Jr.]], [[Ivanka Trump]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/30/nellie-ohr-ivanka-trump-fusion-gps/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Michael Cohen]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/02/20/the-nellie-ohr-dossier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2016 Election year==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See : '''[[Obamagate timeline|Obamagate timeline 2016 Election year]]'''''&lt;br /&gt;
====April 18 - July 31, 2016====&lt;br /&gt;
Sundance of the conservativetreehouse.com summarizes: &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;brown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;At the same time as NSA Director Mike Rogers discovered a significant and unauthorized uptick in FISA-702(16)(17) database queries, and subsequently blocked access (April 18th, 2016), candidate Donald Trump became the presumptive nominee for the presidential race.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;It was within this period where Fusion-GPS was commissioned by Hillary Clinton to focus exclusively on candidate Trump.  Fusion held the prior search findings, and Fusion contracted Christopher Steele who later contacted the FBI through official channels. On July 31st, 2016, FBI counterintelligence operation Crossfire Hurricane became official.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;An official investigation targeting the campaign of Donald Trump now held a legal, albeit sketchy and politically motivated, justification.  Under the auspices of investigating Russian involvement with George Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Paul Manafort and General Michael Flynn, the FBI was now conducting full-blown surveillance on the political campaign of Donald Trump.  Crossfire Hurricane was the legal cover; ‘Spygate’ begins.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''18 April.''' '''FBI contractor (FusionGPS) access cutoff from FISA database.''' As a result of [[NSA Dir. Mike Rogers]] compliance review of [[FISA abuse]] queries by contractors authorized by Obama DOJ &amp;amp; FBI conspirators, contractor access to ongoing FISA intelligence was cut off.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf pp. 83-84]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/hearings/open-hearing-fisa-legislation-0#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''19 April.''' '''[[Mary Jacoby]] attends White House meeting.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2017/12/mary-jacoby-1.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''25 April.''' '''FISA lawyers meet at White House.''' Two White House meetings between [[FBI Counsel James Baker]], [[Trisha B Anderson]] (FBI), [[Tashina Gauhar]] ( DOJ), John T Lynch (DOJ), John (Brad) Wiegmann (DOJ), Alan Rozenshtein (DOJ), Norman (Christopher) Hardee (DOJ), and Iris Lan (DOJ). DOJ attorneys Guahar, Hardee, Wiegmann are FISA attorneys.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/10/a-political-battle-over-dossiers-fisa-warrants-and-surveillance-clouds-a-much-bigger-story/comment-page-4/#comment-4835429&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Db6pdVnUwAEeTaj.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Db6pfSIVwAAXZ39.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://mobile.twitter.com/Jali_Cat/status/948270513075474432&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====August 1 - October 21 2016====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Crossfire Hurricane'''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;brown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;With the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane counterintelligence operation in full swing, the Obama intelligence community, the CIA, was conducting facilitating operations throughout.  In August 2016 CIA Director John Brennan brought the covert intelligence congressional oversight team known as the Gang-of-Eight into the picture.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The CIA angle was explained by Director John Brennan under the open auspices of the CIA operation looking at possible Russian interference with the election.  However, Brennan's activity was more importantly, and intentionally, a supplement to the FBI activity.  Brennan provided FBI Director James Comey with the two-page “EC” or electronic communication document that initiated Crossfire Hurricane in July.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Brennan's role is critical.  Brennan kicked-off Crossfire Hurricane; Brennan's intelligence product was included in President Obama's daily briefing (PDB); and specifically by design, very importantly, Brennan was the ONLY intelligence official briefing congress:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:''Brennan Testimony: “Third, through the so-called Gang-of-Eight process we kept congress apprised of these issues as we identified them.”&lt;br /&gt;
:“Again, in consultation with the White House, '''''I PERSONALLY briefed''' the full details of our understanding of Russian attempts to interfere in the election to congressional leadership; specifically: Senators Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr; and to representatives Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Devin Nunes and Adam Schiff '''between 11th August and 6th September [2016]''''', ''I provided the same briefing to each of the gang of eight members.”&lt;br /&gt;
:“Given the highly sensitive nature of what was an active counter-intelligence case [that means the FBI], involving an ongoing Russian effort, to interfere in our presidential election, the full details of what we knew at the time were shared only with those members of congress; each of whom was accompanied by one senior staff member.”…''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During this time-frame [Aug, Sept, Oct ’16]:  •Chris Steele was funneling the results of his collaborative work with Nellie Ohr into the FBI; •the FBI was conducting full surveillance upon the Trump campaign (CH/Spygate); •and Brennan was seeding the legal background, a plausible justification of sorts which might be needed later, with carefully worded briefings to the Gang-of-Eight.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Critical to note – the Go8 was not being briefed on Crossfire Hurricane/Spygate, which was the FBI operation to conduct internal political surveillance of the Trump campaign.  The Go8 only knew what Brennan was informing them.  Those Brennan briefings were more of a disingenuous overview of generalized Russian interference.  James Comey never briefed the Go8 on his FBI operation. [In March 2017 Comey would tell congress his decision not to inform them was due to “the sensitivity of the matter”.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Toward the end of October things took on a new sense of urgency.  All of the aggregate intelligence exploitation, FISA-702 database extraction, and ongoing campaign surveillance being conducted was seriously fraught with legal peril.  On October 21st, 2016, the FBI urgently applied for, and received, a FISA Title One surveillance warrant against U.S. person Carter Page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That FISC approved warrant made all of the prior FBI surveillance on the Trump campaign completely legal.  In essence the FISA court approved all prior FBI conduct.  Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer approved the warrant.  Sally Yates and James Comey were the application signatories.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Title-One FISA warrant authorizes any and all surveillance methods; and establishes legal authority for retroactive review of all files and records associated with Carter Page; and anyone he comes into contact with; and anyone those contacts come into contact with.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In essence Title-One authority permits all electronic and physical surveillance, wiretaps, phone and electronic records, database extraction etc. The warrant is retroactive.  All of the previous actions against the Trump campaign were now authorized and legal.  A Title-One FISA Court warrant is the highest level of surveillance authority any court can grant.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===FISA abuse===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|FISA abuse}}&lt;br /&gt;
====October 21, 2016 - January 20, 2017====&lt;br /&gt;
'''Carter Page FISA warrant'''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;brown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;The FBI received their FISC surveillance authority two weeks before the November 8th presidential election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Hillary Clinton won the 2016 election all of this would disappear; none of this would ever surface; and the entire operation would just evaporate into the ether of invisible DC history.  But Hillary didn't win.  She lost.  Now, all downstream official action takes an entirely more urgent and important shift.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer authorized the FISA warrant, NSA Director Mike Rogers went to the FISC and informed the same judge of the FISA-702(16)(17) abuses that took place in the 2016 presidential election cycle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judge Collyer issues an explosive opinion lambasting the FBI for their allowed abuse of the system. The DOJ head of the National Security Division, John Carlin, resigned from his position.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump transition===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Trump transition}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Adm. Rogers warns Trump====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mike S Rogers.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Adm. Mike Rogers, the lone dissenter in Brennan's fictitious ''Intelligence Community Assessment'' who alerted the court to FISA abuse and warned President-elect Trump on Obama's illegal wiretapping.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;brown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ten days after the election NSA Director Mike Rogers also travelled to Trump Tower without informing his boss ODNI James Clapper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has been a great deal of speculation as to what Rogers told President-elect Trump during that meeting.  It's likely Director Rogers informed Trump about some of what he knew surrounding the unauthorized surveillance activity and FISA(702) exploitation. However, intelligence is highly compartmented; it's also virtually guaranteed Rogers had no idea what the FBI did, or was doing, with the material and the larger ‘Spygate’ operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Hillary lost the election, CIA Director John Brennan and ODNI James Clapper quickly put together an Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) about Russian interference in the 2016 election. When the report was pushed into the media bloodstream NSA Director Mike Rogers did not hold the same level of confidence in the assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''[…]  A source close to the House investigation said Brennan himself selected the CIA and FBI analysts who worked on the ICA, and that they included former FBI counterespionage chief Peter Strzok.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''“Strzok was the intermediary between Brennan and [former FBI Director James] Comey, and he was one of the authors of the ICA,” according to the source.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/05/14/2_colleagues_contradict_brennan_on_use_of_dossier.html Two Colleagues Contradict Brennan's Denial of Reliance on Dossier], By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations, May 15, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
Again, it is super important to remember congressional oversight has no idea about the FBI operation (CH/Spygate) during the election.  Congressional oversight, the ‘Gang-of-Eight’, only knows what John Brennan has briefed them about; there have been no Go8 briefings by FBI Director James Comey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 2016 election the Go8 members also changed. Senator Dianne Feinstein abdicated her SSCI Vice-Chair position to Senator Mark Warner, and with the retirement of Harry Reid, Senator Chuck Schumer now became minority leader.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2017 Soft coup==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See : '''[[Russiagate timeline 2017|Russiagate timeline 2017 Soft coup]]'''''&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2017 the FBI was evaluating the extent to which Chris Steele was willing to remain on public record to support a false framework about the ''Steele dossier''.  This is the same time-frame where Fusion is being paid by Dan Jones to facilitate the calls for a special counsel.  Fusion drives that narrative with structured leaks to media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christopher Steele’s support was a key issue; if Chris Steele suddenly walked away from the dossier, and/or admitted publicly the dossier was political opposition research primarily from Glenn Simpson and Nellie Ohr, the FBI would have a big problem on its hands, and they needed to evaluate the position of Steele.  Steele could be a risk if he was not supporting the team playbook. That’s the driving purpose behind all of this 2017 “re-engagement” with Steele through Bruce Ohr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The small group in the DOJ and FBI planned to continue, pass-off and modify the Trump investigation by shifting it to a special counsel. The centerpiece of that investigation would be using the dossier as justification for a need to investigate Trump as a Russian risk. The DOJ/FBI small group needed Glenn Simpson and Chris Steele to stand by the false narrative all the players had assembled over the prior year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wildcard to retain the false story was Chris Steele… Steele was an outside participant, albeit aligned with the ideology and the purpose. Evaluating Steele’s willful participation in keeping the narrative as assembled was the reason for their urgent talks; however, the “small group” couldn’t run the risk of direct talks in the same way that Sen. Mark Warner couldn’t risk of a paper trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, in support of the 2017 use of Chris Steele to frame the Russia narrative, the CIA, FBI, ODNI and intelligence community simultaneously pushed the December 2016 Joint Analysis Report (JAR) and the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA), as evidence to support their Russia narrative.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Rice notes on Oval Office meeting====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;brown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;On January 5, 2017, President Obama held an Oval Office meeting with VP Joe Biden, James Comey (FBI), Michael Rogers (NSA), John Brennan (CIA), James Clapper (ODNI), Sally Yates (DOJ) and [[Susan Rice]].   At the conclusion of the briefing, President Obama asks Sally Yates and James Comey to remain.  Together with Susan Rice, this is where the “by the book” comment comes into play. As recounted by Rice:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''“President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.”''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The background context here is important. The outgoing Obama white house team knows what has taken place throughout.  Obama's PDB's (''Presidential Daily Briefing'') have included information about the Trump campaign officials who were under active surveillance.  As the Trump transition team enters into office the FBI surveillance is still ongoing. The counterintelligence operation against the incoming administration, and every participating member, remains in full swing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The day after Obama's oval office meeting, when President-elect Trump is briefed on the Steele Dossier, ODNI James Clapper and FBI Director James Comey cannot brief the target within their investigation on the granular material they used to gain the FISA warrant against the candidate who is now the President-elect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their target was Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump is now the President-elect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's why Comey only briefed Trump on the salacious material... the ‘pee tapes’ and ‘Russian hookers’ nonsense was not part of the FISA application.  The material that was part of the FISA application; the material that outlined candidate Trump as a target; was not shared with the President-elect because it would have amounted to Trump discovering the factual origin of an ongoing counterintelligence operation against him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simultaneous to this transition taking place, all the Trump officials within his team were still under an active FISA Title-One surveillance warrant. This surveillance also included the capture of all of their transition email accounts, the content was later given -without transition team approval- to Robert Mueller by the GAO.  The legal authority for that controversial event was inside the FISA Title-One surveillance warrant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The FISA warrant was reauthorized on January 12th, 2017, about a week before the inauguration of Trump with DAG Sally Yates and James Comey again approving.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Deep State coup===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Deep State coup 1.0}}&lt;br /&gt;
====January 20, 2017 - April 18, 2019====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;brown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Here's where the current background of multiple issues and questions begins to make sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember, as the Trump administration takes office, congressional oversight (Go8) still has no idea what is taking place within the ongoing counterintelligence operation against President Trump and all those around him.  Crossfire Hurricane, aka ‘Spygate’, is mostly invisible in the background.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The need to put factual teeth behind a fraudulently created investigative predicate means the FBI needs to start getting serious about the investigative targets.  Thus in January, for the first time since CH/Spygate began, the FBI reaches out to question George Papadopoulos.  Additionally, on January 24th, 2017, investigators question another origination target, National Security Advisor Michael Flynn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evidence of CH/Spygate surfaces in the actions against appointed National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and George Papadopoulos; however, despite President Trump and FBI Director James Comey twice being together (January 27th and Feb 14th), only the small group within the FBI and DOJ-NSD are aware of the operation as incoming Trump intelligence officials replace outgoing Obama intelligence officials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the same time Comey was personally scrutinizing the president during meetings in the White House and phone conversations from the FBI, he had an agent inside the White House working on the Russia investigation, where he reported back to FBI headquarters about Trump and his aides.  Comey carved out an extraordinary new position for the agent, [[Anthony Ferrante]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.linkedin.com/in/anthonyjferrante/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who specialized in cyber crime, which allowed him to remain on reserve status at the FBI while working in the White House as a cybersecurity adviser.  Ferrante left the White House around the same time Comey was fired and joined a security consulting firm, where he contracted with [[BuzzFeed]] to lead the news site’s efforts to verify the ''Steele dossier'', in connection with a defamation lawsuit.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/02/12/former-senior-fbi-official-is-leading-buzzfeeds-effort-to-verify-trump-dossier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====SSIC leaks Carter Page FISA application====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|James Wolfe indictment}}&lt;br /&gt;
Tthe ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' reported that attorneys for the Director of Security of the Senate Intelligence Committee, James Wolfe, sent letters to all 15 senators on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, notifying them that their [[testimony]] may be sought as part of Wolfe's defense.  Wolfe's apparent defense was that he was acting on the instructions of his superiors when he leaked the Carter Page FISA application to reporter Ali Watkins in March 2017.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/articles/former-intelligence-committee-aides-lawyers-want-testimony-from-senators-1532692801?mod=e2tw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2018 Reckoning==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:31D66D0A-82A4-40E7-A1C2-EBA55EEB357D.jpeg|right|350px|thumb|Prime movers in the [[Deep State coup]]. Comey (first left) funneled raw FISA data to [[FusionGPS]] to make it appear the FBI's illegal surveillance of the Trump campaign came from outside the government;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/11/the-doj-and-fbi-worked-with-fusion-gps-on-operation-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Brennan (second left) collected the bogus ''[[Donald Trump–Russia dossier|Clinton-Steele dossier]]'' from British intelligence sources as part of a supposed routine &amp;quot;intelligence sharing&amp;quot; agreement;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.themarketswork.com/2018/04/09/john-brennans-role-in-the-fbis-trump-russia-investigation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Clapper (third from left) rubber stamped the operation, lied to Trump about the scheme and facilitated leaks to the press to impugn Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/former-dni-james-clapper-allegedly-leaked-to-cnn-investigation-revealed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Adm. Rogers (end right), the lone hero of the group, detected the Obama FBI's abuse of the NSA's [[FISA]] computer system and personally reported the illegal activity to the FISA court.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.themarketswork.com/2018/01/10/an-american-hero-the-death-of-a-fisa-narrative/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''See:'' '''[[Russiagate timeline 2018]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Russiagate timeline''' chronicles [[Obama administration]] appointees and holdovers, in collusion with the [[2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign|Hillary Clinton campaign]] and [[DNC]], efforts to prevent the election of [[Donald J. Trump]] and, after he was elected, remove him from office. The Obama FBI Counterintelligence Division and [[DOJ]] National Security Division conducted an illegal [[counterintelligence]] operation against domestic political opponents.&amp;lt;!--FISA 702(16)(17) --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Blackburn said: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;For those that still believe we are living in democratic, free and open societies it is sadly starting to look like fantasy. Democracies flourish when the checks and balances in the system are robust. We need them to work now more than ever.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
Elizabeth Vos observed: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;In the Trump-Russia and Russian hacking narratives, American and UK intelligence agencies appear to have recklessly and deceptively acted in the interest of a single political candidate, Hillary Clinton. This singularity of purpose speaks to the insecurity and magnitude of the unelected Western power structure, equaled by the scale of lies propping up the Trump-Russia and Russian hacking narratives.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2019 The Empire Strikes Back==&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate impetus for the appointment of Robert Mueller after the firing of James Comey was to cover up FBI actions, or rather, lack of actions when Comey and [[Andrew McCabe]] were notified (September 28, 2016) of the existence of the [[Weiner laptop]] in the closing days of the 2016 election. The FBI leadership was pre-occupied with several other matters - notably [[hoax]]ing the [[FISA court]] to get retroactive approval for the FBI's illegal domestic surveillance of [[Carter Page]] and the Trump campaign. This, along with managing illegal leaks coming from [[Christopher Steele]], [[Lisa Page]], [[Mike Kortan]], and [[Andrew McCabe]]. The Weiner laptop was never examined until after the election. FBI personnel in the New York office who seized the laptop, feared being the  designated fallguys for a botched investigation, forced James Comey to go public who then made the false statement that the laptop had been examined. All this was predicated on an assumption that Hillary Clinton would win.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Trump won, and Comey was fired, McCabe then was entrusted to keeping a lid on the wrongdoing and away from Congressional investigators. Rosenstein, a Trump appointee, was mainly concerned about the reputation and integrity of the Department of Justice. Mueller, who colluded with [[Hillary Clinton]] in the Uranium One scandal and with [[Oleg Deripaska]] in the past, was the perfect choice to lead a new investigation. Mueller, Rosentein, [[Andrew Weissmann]], McCabe and [[Peter Strzok]] had all been involved in covering up old [[Clinton scandal]]s. Others, such as [[James Baker (DOJ)]], [[Sally Yates]], [[John Carlin]], [[John Brennan]], DNI boss [[James Clapper]], [[Mary McCord (DOJ)]], [[Lisa Page]], [[Bruce Ohr]] and more top-level [[intelligence community]] personnel all were involved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact of the existence of the Mueller probe kept Congressional Committees from subpoenaing and examining documents into the 2016 election, and stalling at least until the [[2018 Midterm elections]]. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
===January 2019===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''8 January.''' Max Blumenthal: New Documents Reveal a Covert British Military-Intelligence Smear Machine Meddling In American Politics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thegrayzone.com/2019/01/08/new-documents-reveal-a-covert-british-military-intelligence-smear-machine-meddling-in-american-politics/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''15 January.''' [[Jim Jordan]] and [[Mark Meadows]] write to US Attorney John Dunham regarding criminal leak investigation of [[Jim Baker (DOJ)]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/409884584/Jordan-and-Meadows-Letter-to-US-Attorney-Durham#fullscreen&amp;amp;from_embed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''21 January.''' ''Disobedient Media'': Death Of Russiagate: Mueller Team Tied To Mifsud's Network.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://disobedientmedia.com/2019/01/death-of-russiagate-mueller-team-tied-to-mifsuds-network/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''23 January.''' Mueller office illegally leaks [[Roger Stone]] indictment, written by [[Andrew Weissmann]], to [[CNN]]. The illegal [[leak]] is a bigger crime that carries a heavier penalty than what Stone was charged with. 29 heavily armed agents, including frogmen and armored vehicles, were sent to Stone's home to make the arrest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/399573829/Stone-Motion-To-Show-Cause-RE-Illegal-Leak-of-Indictment#from_embed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===February 2019===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Schiff Simpson.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Glenn Simpson (right) colluded with Adam Schiff (left). Simpson was hired by Hillary Clinton and behind the ''Steele dossier''; Schiff was Ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee investigating Simpson.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''2 February.''' FISA MEMO LEAK: McCabe Admits FBI Used Bogus Steele Dossier Paid For By Hillary to Obtain FISA Warrant to Spy on Trump/&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://truepundit.com/fisa-memo-leak-mccabe-admits-fbi-used-bogus-steele-dossier-paid-hillary-obtain-fisa-warrant-spy-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''8 February.''' [[Adam Schiff]] recusal demanded after [[collusion]] with [[Glenn Simpson]] revealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-08/giant-and-illegal-hoax-trump-reams-2018-schiff-simpson-meeting-aspen&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/429041-adam-schiff-glenn-simpson-and-their-forrest-gump-like-encounter-in-aspen&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''12 February.''' [[Ken Dilanian]]: Senate Democrats agree no Russia collusion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/12/nbc_dilanian_senate_probe_finds_no_evidence_of_russian_collusion_in_trump_campaign.html NBC's Dilanian: Senate Probe Finds No Evidence Of Russian Collusion In Trump Campaign]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''13 February.''' [[Roger Stone]] files motion to force Mueller to prove he didn't leak to [[CNN]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Caplan, Joshua (February 13, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/13/roger-stone-files-motion-to-force-mueller-to-prove-he-didnt-leak-to-cnn/ &amp;quot;Roger Stone files motion to force Mueller to prove he didn't leak to [[CNN]]&amp;quot;].  Breitbart website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''14 February.''' [[William Barr]] sworn in as AG.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''15 February.''' DOJ [[coup]] attempt confirmed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/constitutional-lawyer-drops-bombshell-doj-attempted-coup-president-trump-mccabes-testimony-true/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Yakov Applebaum: ''Who Done It?''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://apelbaum.wordpress.com/2019/02/15/who-done-it/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''16 February.''' [[McCabe]] admits on ''[[60 Minutes]]'' he engaged in a [[coup]]-plot against President Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/GbCle3OboFc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/02/15/7-big-takeaways-andrew-mccabes-planned-coup/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/02/17/andrew-mccabe-60-minutes-interview-moments-and-excerpts-also-did-mccabe-leak-the-michael-flynn-phone-call/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/02/16/the-fbi-came-close-to-staging-a-coup/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''19 February.''' How A Plea Reversal From Michael Flynn Could Uncover More Federal Corruption.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2018/02/19/michael-flynns-plea-reversal-uncover-federal-corruption/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''21 February.''' IRS intelligence analyst John Fry charged with leaking [[Michael Cohen]] financial records to [[Michael Avenatti]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/02/21/irs-intelligence-analyst-john-fry-charged-with-leaking-cohen-financial-records-to-creepy-porn-lawyer/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''22 February.''' CIA implicated in attack on [[North Korea]]n embassy in [[Madrid]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''El Pais'' (''The Country'') is the second most circulated daily newspaper in [[Spain]]. https://elpais.com/elpais/2019/03/13/inenglish/1552464196_279320.htmlL&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/03/cia-blames-its-proxy-for-its-raid-on-north-koreas-embassy-in-spain.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===March 2019===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''1 March.''' Reps. [[Jim Jordan]] and [[Mark Meadows]] ask [[William Barr]] for any information on [[Andrew Weissmann]] and [[Zainab Ahmad]]'s contacts with [[Bruce Ohr]] in 2016 prior to the November election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/_IxAH1exoU0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ohr testified he relayed the tainted dossier from [[Christopher Steele]] to Weissman and Ahmad. Weissmann and Ahmad were appointed to the Muller team in May 2017, a possible violation of DOJ regulations and indication of political bias. Did Weissmann and Ahmad disclose to Mueller that they were in on the Russia collusion hoax and DOJ misconduct prior to accepting appointment to the Mueller team?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/release/jordan-and-meadows-request-information-on-two-prosecutors-on-the-special-counsels-team/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/2019-03-01-JDJ-MM-to-Barr-re-Special-Counsels-Investigation.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
*'''5 Mueller.''' Ms. [[Jessie Liu]] nominated to be the Associate Attorney General,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-plans-to-nominate-dcs-us-attorney-jessie-liu-for-justice-depts-no-3-job/2019/03/05/89417950-3f91-11e9-a0d3-1210e58a94cf_story.html?noredirect=on&amp;amp;utm_term=.5885dd84ae30&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the DOJ's No. 3 spot replacing [[Rachel Brand]]. Liu was assigned the criminal referral of [[Andrew McCabe]] (April 19, 2018) and was in charge of the impaneled grand jury (Approx. July 2018). Liu also was a decision-maker in the arrest of [[Senate Intelligence Committee]] Security Dir. James Wolfe: grand jury (May 3rd 2018); [[James Wolfe indictment]] (June 7th 2018), non-prosecution, plea deal, and eventual sentence (December 20th 2018).&lt;br /&gt;
*FBI Agent Bill Evanina, an Obama administration holdover and head of the National Counterintelligence and Security Center, a DNI unit, nomination placed on hold by Sen. [[Chuck Grassley]]. DNI and DOJ is still stonewalling Grassley requests for briefings and documents related to 2016 election controversies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/national-security/controversial-counterintelligence-nominee-on-hold-in-senate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''7 March.''' David Harsanyi: The Democratic Party Has Normalized Anti-Semitism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/07/democratic-party-has-normalized-anti-semitism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nellie Ohr]] sent reams of open-source intelligence to her husband, Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, and on some occasions to at least three DOJ prosecutors: Lisa Holtyn, Ivana Nizich and Joseph Wheatley.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Nellie Ohr testified to Congress that she did not share her Fusion GPS research with anyone except her husband Bruce Ohr and Christopher Steele.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''8 March.''' Rep. [[Doug Collins]] inserts full unredacted [[Bruce Ohr]] testimony in the Congressional Record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dougcollins.house.gov/ohr&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--*'''11 March.''' [[John Podesta]] visits Jacinda Ardern in [[New Zealand.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;amp;objectid=12211429&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*David Archey, supervisor of all FBI personnel in the Mueller probe, re-assigned as head of the Richmond, VA, FBI field office.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''10 March.''' Mueller eyeing $10 million book deal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/robert-mueller-could-get-10m-book-deal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''12 March.''' Doug Collins releases two days of [[Lisa Page]] testimony with few redactions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dougcollins.house.gov/page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Washington Post'' reports: {{quotebox|senior bureau officials were also expressing anti-[[Hillary Clinton|Clinton]] animus — but that neither affected how agents working those cases carried out their jobs.  “Many of us in law enforcement dislike the subject of our investigations. We are not keen on [[pedophile]]s and [[fraud]]sters and spies and human traffickers,” Page said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.li/rAd7G#selection-1131.203-1135.164&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
*'''13 March.''' [[Michael Flynn]] cooperation agreement with Mueller office terminated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/13/michael-flynn-cooperation-with-special-counsel-robert-mueller-is-complete.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) open letter to William Barr asking him not to allow Mueller Report to perpetuate false narrative of [[DNC]] hacking by Russians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/03/13/vips-muellers-forensics-free-findings/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!--Nancy Salzman, co-founder of the NXIVM sex cult pleads guilty to sex slavery;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courthousenews.com/co-founder-of-group-tied-to-sex-slavery-pleads-guilty/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Salzman is a member of the Clinton Global Initiative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2007/10/01/hillarys-30000-fans-are-her-cult-following/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Founder Keith Raniere charged with manufacturing child pornography.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''1MDB scandal.''' StatusCoup: Does Kamala Harris Fundraiser Co-Host Have Connection to Global Money-Laundering Scandal?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://statuscoup.com/does-kamala-harris-fundraiser-cohost-connection-global-money-laundering-scandal/ Does Kamala Harris Fundraiser Co-Host Have Connection to Global Money-Laundering Scandal?], Jordan Chariton, StatusCoup, Mar 13, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''14 March.''' [[Andrew Weissmann]] forced out at Justice Department.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-14/top-mueller-prosecutor-weissmann-steps-down-latest-sign-probe-ending&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Doug Collins enters [[Peter Strzok]] unredacted testimony into the Congressional Record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dougcollins.house.gov/strzok&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[David Kramer]] deposition unsealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/401932342/Kramer-Depositioin#from_embed?campaign=VigLink&amp;amp;ad_group=xxc1xx&amp;amp;source=hp_affiliate&amp;amp;medium=affiliate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--*Gordon Caplan, co-chair of Willkie Farr &amp;amp; Gallagher LLP, arrested in Operation Varsity Blues (College Admission scandal).--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''15 March.''' Peter Schweizer: Inside the shady private equity firm run by Kerry and Biden's kids.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2018/03/15/inside-the-shady-private-equity-firm-run-by-kerry-and-bidens-kids/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''17 March.''' William Craddick tweets, &amp;quot;Russiagate was designed in part to help the [[UK]] counter Russian influence by baiting the United States into taking a hard line against them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/williamcraddick/status/1107351043329814528&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''18 March.''' [[John McCain]] role in [[Deep state coup]] unsealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/deposition-reveals-late-senator-mccains-role-in-spygate-scandal_2840198.html?ref=brief_News&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/401932342/Kramer-Depositioin#from_embed?campaign=VigLink&amp;amp;ad_group=xxc1xx&amp;amp;source=hp_affiliate&amp;amp;medium=affiliate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Devin Nunes]] files $250 million defamation suit against [[Twitter]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/402297422/Nunes-Complaint-3-18-19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1_c860YIPc&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''19 March.''' Papadopoulos: Mueller investigated Israel ties, not Russian ones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Papadopoulos-Muller-investigated-Israel-ties-not-Russian-ones-585304&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Christopher Steele]] took posts from random users on CNN I-Report page, put them in the dossier, and passed it to the FBI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbWBBdSp1N4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''20 March.''' John Solomon: Top Ukrainian justice official says US ambassador gave him a do not prosecute list.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/434875-top-ukrainian-justice-official-says-us-ambassador-gave-him-a-do-not-prosecute&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Reps. Jim Jordan and Mark Meadows send a letter to Attorney General William Barr wanting to know what is the status of the criminal referral for fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/402595528/Jordan-and-Meadows-Letter-to-AG-Barr&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Jewish News Syndicate: Anti-Semitism has a history in the Democratic Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jns.org/opinion/anti-semitism-has-a-history-in-the-democratic-party/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''22 March.''' Bill Barr notifies Congress that Mueller probe is complete. No Russia collusion indictments.&lt;br /&gt;
:*New Strzok/Lisa Page texts released reflecting concerns from the DOJ over “possible bias of the chs [confidential human source],&amp;quot; likely referring to Christopher Steele. Lisa Page noted that “This might take a high-level push.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fbi-clashed-doj-biased-fisa-source-texts-mccabe-page&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Brian Whitaker: The Joseph Mifsud archive.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://medium.com/@Brian_Whit/the-joseph-mifsud-archive-6eae007fb2be The Joseph Mifsud archive], Brian Whitaker, Mar 22, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''25 March.''' [[Michael Avenatti]] arrested on extortion and fraud charges; [[Mark Geragos]] named co-conspirator.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://abc7news.com/michael-avenatti-could-face-333-years-in-prison-if-convicted/5243249/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) says DOJ Inspector General [[Michael Horowitz]] was looking into the origins of [[collusion]], along with [[probable cause]] used by the FBI to initiate their investigation, in addition to his investigation into [[FISA abuse]]. Ratcliffe also noted that John Huber, the U.S. attorney in Utah, has “been dispatched to look into the criminal aspects” that might be associated with Horowitz’s work.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://video.foxnews.com/v/6017775375001/#sp=show-clips&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Rudy Giuliani]] calls for investigation of investigators.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/giuliani-trump-accusers-need-to-apologize-after-mueller-report-finds-no-russia-collusion&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[President Trump]] cites &amp;quot;treasonous acts&amp;quot; in the Obama/Clinton/DNC Russia collusion hoax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/video/trump-goes-on-offense-cites-treasonous-acts/vp-BBVdgPU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''26 March.''' CIA, MI6 have been helping Ukraine's SBU spy agency in planning its covert operations - ex-officer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sott.net/article/409874-CIA-MI6-have-been-helping-Ukraines-SBU-spy-agency-in-planning-its-covert-operations-ex-officer&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Former SBU officer dishes the dirt on Ukraine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://johnplatinumgoss.wordpress.com/2019/03/26/former-sbu-officer-dishes-the-dirt-on-ukraine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''27 March.''' John Brennan insisted the ''Clinton/Steel dossier'' be included in the January 2017 ''Intelligence Community Assessment''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rand-paul-source-says-john-brennan-pushed-discredited-steele-dossier&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Brennan further perjured himself in sworn testimony to Congress saying it wasn't. Brennan briefed Democrat Leader Harry Reid on the ''Clinton/Steele dossier'' in August 2016 to urge an FBI investigation of Trump, and lied saying he did not hear about th''Clinton/Steele dossier'' until December 2016, after the election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://amgreatness.com/2019/03/28/brennan-the-menace/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Brennan backpeddles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/PolishPatriotTM/status/1110211940104704001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''28 March.''' Jessie Liu withdraws from consideration of Associate Attorney General, the DOJ No. 3 slot.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[John Brennan]] faces criminal referral in Trump-Russia scam and coup plot.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/03/28/heres-why-devin-nunes-could-submit-a-criminal-referral-for-cia-director-john-brennan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Calls for [[Adam Schiff]] to resign from [[HPSCI]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/45_Schedule/status/1111303851934707713&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Barack Obama]]'s role in Russia collusion hoax questioned.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/senator-offers-amendment-to-reveal-obamas-role-in-probing-trump-campaign_2858353.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is unlikely John Brennan violated the law on his own.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Bloomberg'' reported that the Swedish bank Swedbank “may now be facing substantial fines for money laundering that could put pressure on its capital buffers.” The story was notable as it tied into existing investigations in Danske Bank’s Estonia money-laundering case, which originated with the release of the Panama Papers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-22/swedbank-ceo-survives-initial-laundering-review-as-probe-deepens&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.svtplay.se/video/21252251/uppdrag-granskning/uppdrag-granskning-sasong-20-swedbank-and-the-money-laundering-part-2?start=auto&amp;amp;tab=2019&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''29 March.''' [[Joe Biden]]'s [[obstruction of justice]] in firing a prosecutor exposed. Biden pressured Ukrainian [[President Poroshenko]] to the Prosecutor General investing his son, Hunter Biden, on money laundering and corruption charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===April 2019===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ukrainian collusion]] with Democrats to interfere in the 2016 presidential election runs as a common thread throughout the April 2019 release of the Mueller Report.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/04/16/a-common-thread-in-events-ahead-of-mueller-report/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''2 April.''' ''Law and Crime.com:'' Biden Reportedly ‘Bragged’ About the Firing of a Prosecutor Who Was Investigating His Son’s Firm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/biden-reportedly-bragged-about-the-firing-of-a-prosecutor-who-was-investigating-his-sons-firm/ Biden Reportedly ‘Bragged’ About the Firing of a Prosecutor Who Was Investigating His Son’s Firm], by Colin Kalmbacher,  April 2nd, 2019. https://lawandcrime.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''3 April.''' Peter Schweizer: Joe Biden 'Steered $1.8 Billion' to Ukraine While His Son Got Sweetheart Deal From Their Government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/03/exclusive-peter-schweizer-joe-biden-steered-1-8-billion-to-ukraine-while-his-son-bagged-sweetheart-deal-from-their-government/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''4 April.''' [[Stefan Halper]] attempted to smear [[Gen. Michael Flynn]] as consorting with a Russian agent in February 2014 when Flynn was Obama's [[DIA]] director.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Svetlana Lokhova, a dual Russian and British citizen, said “What Halper staged is a textbook ‘black-op’ to dirty up the reputation of a political opponent. He needed an innocuous social event to place Flynn in a room with a woman who was ethnically Russian. I was unlucky he picked me.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/04/cambridge-halper-flynn-spygate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''5 April.''' [[Patrick Byrne]]'s first meeting with the FBI in the [[Maria Butina]] case.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''7 April.''' ''The Hill'' published an article, entitled, ''Ukrainian to US prosecutors: Why don’t you want our evidence on [[Democrats]]?,'' which included an interview with Kostiantyn Kulyk, deputy head of the Prosecutor General's International Legal Cooperation Department in Ukraine. The article touched on numerous aspects of Ukrainian-Democrat ties in the 2016 presidential election and also highlighted Joe Biden's role.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Giuliani says &amp;quot;I want the Ukraine investigated. Because I think, in the Ukraine, we’re going to find a lot of answers for how the [[Steele dossier]] was put together, how the [[Manafort]] case was revived…how many Ukrainians were involved and was the embassy in the Ukraine involved in helping to develop some of this evidence? That’s all very, very important to pointing out where this started. This was a frame-up. An old-fashioned frame-up.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*Rep. Mark Meadows says “Overwhelming evidence shows multiple FBI and DOJ executives abused their power to undermine a duly elected President Trump. They will be held accountable.”&lt;br /&gt;
*Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for the Government Computer Intrusions: The Definitive Summary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/04/attkisson-v-doj-and-fbi-for-the-government-computer-intrusions-the-definitive-summary-2/#Lawsuit-Latest&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''8 April.''' David Archey, FBI lead investigator in the Mueller probe, reveals to Obama Judge James E. Boasberg the existence of more Comey memos. Comey documented meetings and conversations, and also notes of the sources and methods associated with the Trump investigation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/09/court-filing-reveals-numerous-comey-memos-including-investigative-meetings-sources-methods-and-contacts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
*'''9 April.''' Barr tells Congress he is looking into the FBI's actions in Spygate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-09/barr-said-to-form-team-to-review-fbi-s-actions-in-trump-probe&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Rep. [[Ted Lieu]]  played a [[fake news]] clip of [[Candace Owens]] in a House Judiciary Committee hearing. Owens provided proper context in a strongly worded response that left Lieu visibly shaken. The video would go viral as one of [[C-SPAN]]'s the most watched clips with 7.4 million views.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBugle/status/1115674586996039681&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''10 April.''' Barr says spying on Trump did occur.&lt;br /&gt;
:*President Trump blasted former FBI Director [[James Comey]] and former Deputy FBI Director [[Andrew McCabe]] as dirty cops, saying, “This was an attempted [[coup]]. This was an attempted takedown of a president,&amp;quot; and “what they did was [[treason]].”&lt;br /&gt;
*'''11 April.''' '''[[Julian Assange]] removed from the [[Ecuador]] embassy in [[London]]'''. Assange faces a single charge of allegedly helping [[Chelsea Manning]], who was pardoned by Obama, of hacking.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/press-release/file/1153481/download&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under the “Doctrine of Specialty” provisions of the US-UK extradition treaty, no further charges can be added after extradition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/187784.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If the charges are dropped, Assange will be free tell where he received DNC and [[John Podesta]] emails from.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Obama White General Counsel [[Greg Craig]] indicted. for “making false statements and concealing material information about his activities on behalf of Ukraine.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/washington-based-lawyer-indicted-charge-making-false-statements-department-justice&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The indictment stated that “The purpose of the scheme was for CRAIG to avoid registration as an agent of Ukraine. Registration would require disclosure of the fact that” an unnamed Ukrainian “had paid CRAIG and the Law Firm more than $4 million[.]” The indictment makes repeated mention of an unnamed “American lobbyist,” whom Ukraine had employed to “improve Ukraine’s international public image.” The lobbyist being referenced is likely [[Paul Manafort]]. Craig said in a video statement on April 15, that Ukrainian oligarch [[Victor Pinchuk]], a major donor to the [[Clinton Foundation]], “helped fund” a 2012 report.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDT3Xsc87sA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Nunes makes criminal referrals to the [[Attorney General]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/405929465/Nunes-Referral-Notification#from_embed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''12 April.''' Giuliani says &amp;quot;Assange could expose a plot involving Ukraine to falsely accuse Trump of colluding with Russia.&amp;quot; Guiliani was referring to &amp;quot;Assange exposing the origins of the federal investigation of possible Trump collusion with Russia and was not raising the possibility of Assange disproving that Russia hacked the [[Democratic National Committee]] and [[2016 Clinton campaign|Clinton campaign]] Chairman John Podesta.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/white-house/giuliani-assange-could-expose-that-ukraine-was-behind-false-russia-collusion-charges&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Epoch Times'': Ties to Ukrainian National a Unifying Theme in Early Attacks on Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/ties-to-ukrainian-national-a-unifying-theme-in-early-attacks-on-trump_2872609.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''15 April.''' ''Wall Street Journal'' Op-Ed: ''The FBI needs a grand jury, Only the threat of indictment will get Bill Barr to the truth''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fbi-needs-a-grand-jury-11555368140&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Andrew McCarthy: '' Behind the Obama administration’s shady plan to spy on the Trump campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2019/04/15/behind-the-obama-administrations-shady-plan-to-spy-on-the-trump-campaign/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''16 April.''' Democrat House Judiciary Committee chairman [[Elijah Cummings]] and Democrat House Financial Services chairwoman [[Maxine Waters]] have signed memorandums of understanding (MOUs) to exchange information in violation of House Rules. Both committees have issued subpoenas to investigate Trump in their respective areas of oversight. Under House Rules, a committee chair cannot enter into a memorandum of understanding with other committee chairs without a vote of the Committee and consultation with the ranking member.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/reps-elijah-cummings-maxine-waters-and-adam-schiff-sign-secret-mous-to-target-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) calls out the “central-but-unproven allegation” of Russia hacking the DNC, criticizes Mueller for relying on “a discredited, DNC-hired firm named [[CrowdStrike]], whose credibility is on a par with ‘pee-tape dossier’ compiler Christopher Steele”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/04/16/vips-fault-mueller-probe-criticize-refusal-to-interview-assange/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Poll: 58% say it's likely Obama or his top aids knew the FBI spied on the Trump campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/april_2019/most_say_it_s_likely_obama_top_aides_aware_of_trump_spying Most Say It’s Likely Obama, Top Aides Aware of Trump Spying]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''17 April.''' Devin Nune [[Mueller team]] obstructed Congressional investigation; stalled any effort to expose the unlawful aspects of “SpyGate’ and the fraudulent foundation behind the Carter Page FISA application; and undermined any adverse discoveries in the leak investigations (James Wolfe) writ large.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/17/devin-nunes-outlines-three-key-issues-post-mueller-report-also-confirms-mueller-blocked-key-document-production/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Matt Taibbi: James Comey, the Would-Be J. Edgar Hoover.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/taibbi-james-comey-the-would-be-j-edgar-hoover-629610/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mueller-and-yanu.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Mueller with Putin puppet [[Viktor Yanukovych]]. Mueller later indicted [[Paul Manafort]] for unpaid taxes on income Manafort and [[Bernie Sanders]] campaign chairman received while employed by Yanukovych.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''18 April.''' '''Mueller Report released'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/mueller-report.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mueller claimed Russian interference in 2016 election spent “approximately $100,000” on [[Facebook]] ads, hired someone to walk around [[New York City]] “dressed up as [[Santa Claus]] with a Trump mask,” and got “dozens of tweets, posts, and other political content.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-20/judge-orders-mueller-prove-russian-company-meddled-election&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theduran.com/mueller-report-takes-russian-meddling-for-granted-offers-no-actual-evidence/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller’s finding that Michael Cohen did not travel to Prague to conspire with Russians.&lt;br /&gt;
:*No evidence that Carter Page conspired with Russians.&lt;br /&gt;
:*No mention of Paul Manafort visiting Julian Assange in London.&lt;br /&gt;
:*No mention of secret communications between a Trump Tower computer server and Russia’s Alfa Bank.&lt;br /&gt;
:*No mention of former NRA lawyer Cleta Mitchell or her supposed knowledge of a scheme to launder Russian money through the NRA for the Trump campaign. Insinuations against Mitchell originated with Fusion GPS chief Glenn Simpson and were first made public in a document published by Democrats on HPSCI committee.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Excerpts from a voicemail from Trump attorney John Dowd that the Mueller team selectively edited to make it seem threatening and nefarious.&lt;br /&gt;
:*No comment on the close relationship between Democrat operatives at Fusion GPS and multiple Russians who participated in the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower. In fact, no comment on Fusion GPS at all.&lt;br /&gt;
:*No useful information on figures who played key roles in the investigation such as Joseph Mifsud, Alexander Downer, or Christopher Steele.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The Mueller dossier cites dozens of articles from the reporters and publications that were most responsible for perpetuating the Russia hoax. Mueller produced a perfect feedback loop: intelligence leakers spin a false story to the media, the media publishes the story, Mueller cites the story, and the media and the Democrats then fake outrage at Mueller’s findings.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Glenn Greenwald writes ''Robert Mueller Did Not Merely Reject the Trump-Russia Conspiracy Theories. He Obliterated Them.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/robert-mueller-did-not-merely-reject-the-trumprussia-conspiracy-theories-he-obliterated-them/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Australia]] confirms role in Trump-Russia coup plot.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/downer-papadopolous-trump-mueller-russia?utm_source=dynamic&amp;amp;utm_campaign=bfsharetwitter&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''[[BuzzFeed]] reports that [[FBI]] investigators illegally [[leak]]ed information in the [[Michael Cohen]] investigation''' to Buzzfeed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/bensmith/how-we-characterized-michael-cohens-testimony?bftwnews&amp;amp;utm_term=4ldqpgc#4ldqpgc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*U.S. [[intelligence community]] has become [[partisan]] and politicized, dominated by [[liberal]]s loyal to the [[Democratic party]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/national-security/u-s-intelligence-institutionally-politicized-toward-democrats/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''New York Times'' Trump-Russia expert Maggie Haberman thinks ''Edelweiss'' is a [[Nazi]] anthem.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://forward.com/culture/theater/422910/i-cant-believe-i-have-to-say-this-but-no-edelweiss-is-not-a-nazi-anthem/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''19 April.''' Ukrainian prosecutors to US: Why don't you want our evidence on Democrats?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/437719-ukrainian-to-us-prosecutors-why-dont-you-want-our-evidence-on-democrats&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Mifsud]] found alive and living near U.S. embassy in Rime.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.is/OWWSx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Democrat]]s alleged to the court that Mifsud was dead and unavailable to be interviewed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/405672-dnc-lawyers-papadopoulos-uk-contact-may-be-dead&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:State-department-email-chris-steele.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Smoking gun: State Department email proves political motivation of the ''Steele dossier'' ten days before the FBI used it to hoax the FISA court.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''20 April.''' Ukrainian plot to interfere in the 2016 election to help Clinton emerges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/435029-as-russia-collusion-fades-ukrainian-plot-to-help-clinton-emerges&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''21 April.''' Obama-backed [[fascist]]s ousted in [[Ukrainian]] elections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mondialisation.ca/u-s-government-backs-ukraine-fascists-who-want-to-destroy-russia/5513195&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://newrepublic.com/article/117692/fascism-returns-ukraine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Zelensky]] elected president with 73 percent of the vote.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''22 April.'''  51 Fake News ‘Bombshells’ the Media Spread About RussiaGate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/04/22/top-51-fake-news-bombshells-media-spread-russiagate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''23 April.''' Jeff Carlson: Dana Boente's Many Critical Positions Within the Trump Administration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/04/23/dana-boentes-many-critical-positions-within-the-trump-administration/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''24 April.''' James Clapper Knew There Was No Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion In 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/04/24/james-clapper-knew-no-evidence-trump-russia-collusion-2016/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller Report Shatters Credibility of Steele Dossier.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/mueller-report-shatters-credibility-of-steele-dossier_2892999.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Everything After March 9, 2016 Was A Cover Up Operation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/trump-tweet-uk-intelligence-spygate.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''25 April.''' President Trump for the first time used the terms “attempted coup” and “overthrow” to discuss the coordinated effort against his administration by the previous administration including James Clapper (ODNI), John Brennan (CIA), James Comey (FBI), and lower level officials within the intelligence apparatus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/2xglDpABkCA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*10 days after the 2016 election, Strzok and Lisa Page discussed a Trump transition team informant, Joshua Pitcock, Vice President-elect [[Mike Pence]]’s Chief of Staff. Pitcock's wife, Katie, is an FBI agent who worked with Peter Strzok on the Clinton email investigation. Katie is reported to have recused herself from the Trump-Russia counterintelligence investigation after Pence was nominated. Trump announced Pence as his pick on July 15, 2016. Trump and Pence officially became nominees on July 21, 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/breaking-fbi-texts-show-agents-discussed-recruiting-white-house-sources-to-spy-for-bureau/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-04-25/fbi-texts-show-agents-discussed-recruiting-white-house-sources-spy-bureau&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; 10 days later on July 31, 2016 Strzok began the paperwork officially opening the Trump-Russia counterintelligence investigation. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Through Pitcock the FBI hoped to recruit other informants in the Trump transition team.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Questions remain about the lingering relationship between Strzok, Pitcock and his wife Katie after July 2016, during the transition, and into the start of the administration. Pitcock worked for Pence as his Chief of Staff from January, 2017 until he resigned in August, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The connection raises questions regarding information that may have moved from the FBI into the vice president’s orbit regarding National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. &lt;br /&gt;
*Deputy Assistant Secretary of State [[Kathleen Kavalec]]’s written account of her Oct. 11, 2016, meeting with FBI informant Christopher Steele shows the Hillary Clinton campaign-funded British intelligence operative admitted that his research was political and facing a Novermber 8, 2016 Election Day deadline. The confession occurred 10 days before the FBI used Steele’s discredited dossier to justify securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant on the Trump campaign. Steele's client, the Clinton campaign, “is keen to see this information come to light prior to November 8.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[FOIA]] notes contain this explanation for the redactions: “Classified by FBI on 4/25/2019 — Class: SECRET....Declassify on 12/31/2041,” 25 years after the 2016 election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/442592-steeles-stunning-pre-fisa-confession-informant-needed-to-air-trump-dirt#.XNIAVvr8PT0.twitter&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*5 Times The Mueller Probe Broke Prosecutorial Rules That Ensure Justice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/04/25/5-times-mueller-probe-broke-prosecutorial-rules-ensure-justice/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Massachusetts liberal]] judge indicted for aiding [[illegal alien]] escape capture.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/407620668/Federal-Indictment-Shelley-Joseph-and-Wesley-Macgregor&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Corrupt [[Baltimore]] Democrat Mayor May Have Fled State After FBI and [[IRS]] Raid of Her Home and Office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2019/04/25/catherine-pugh-meeting-with-legal-team/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In March 2018 Baltimore Mayor Catherine Pugh announced that the city would send 60 buses to the march against guns in Washington DC.. The Baltimore city school system did not have enough money to heat the schools in 2018 but found the money to bus kids to an anti-gun rally.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Trump-antisemitic-3.jpg|right|350px|thumb|A blatantly [[anti-Semitic]] cartoon depicting [[Israel]]i [[Prime Minister]] [[Benjamin Netanyahu]] as a guide dog with a [[Star of David]] collar leading a blind [[President Trump]] wearing a skullcap. The cartoon accompanied an op-ed published 4/25/19 in the International Edition of the ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/homenews/media/440957-ny-times-opinion-apologizes-for-cartoon-depicting-anti-semitic-tropes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''New York Times'' publishes [[anti-Semitic]] cartoon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Antisemitism/Flood-of-condemnations-of-NYT-for-anti-Semitic-cartoon-588044&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''26 April.''' Lawyers in Russian Bot Case Demand Judge Hold Mueller in Contempt For Making Allegations in Report That Were Left Out of Indictment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/lawyers-in-russian-bot-case-demand-judge-hold-mueller-in-contempt-for-making-allegations-in-report-that-were-left-out-of-indictment/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The practical effect on Concord Management was to advise the world, including potential jurors, that the allegations in the [[US v. Concord Management|indictment against Concord Management]] are true and that the defendants in this case were operating as part of a Russian-government led interference campaign, denying them a fair trial. Concord Management is still in pre-trial proceedings in US Federal Court and rules forbid under criminal penalty of law any assertion of this kind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5978065-4-25-19-Concord-Motion-for-Show-Cause-Order.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''27 April.''' President Trump said that links between Ukraine and the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and the Obama administration should be investigated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqtvX36MlPI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Mueller will not be called before the Senate to testify.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Joe Biden]], Obama Officials Stood to Gain From Ukraine Influence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/04/27/joe-biden-obama-officials-stood-to-gain-from-ukraine-influence/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump hater shoots up [[California]] [[synagogue]], kills one injuring several.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.is/9rV3Y&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''28 April.''' [[Lindsey Graham]] takes up [[Deep State]] narrative: “the Russians hacked into John Podesta’s e-mails, the campaign manager for the Democratic candidate for President. The Russians hacked into Hillary Clinton’s e-mails, the candidate for the Democratic Party.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbsnews.com/news/full-transcript-of-face-the-nation-on-april-28-2019/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*After Trump discusses &amp;quot;overthrow&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;coup,&amp;quot; [[Sally Yates]] surfaces to give CYA interview.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/28/trump-baits-coup-and-overthrow-sally-yates-surfaces/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sundance publishes List of Documents for Declassification and Public Release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
♦ President Trump can prove the July 31st, 2016, Crossfire Hurricane counterintelligence operation originated from a scheme within the intelligence apparatus by exposing the preceding CIA operation that created the originating “Electronic Communication” memo. Declassify that two-page “EC” document that Brennan gave to Comey.  [The trail is found within the Weissmann report and the use of Alexander Downer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
♦ Release and declassify all of the Comey memos that document the investigative steps taken by the FBI as an outcome of the operation coordinated by CIA Director John Brennan in early 2016.  [The trail was memorialized by James Comey]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
♦ Reveal the November 2015 through April 2016 FISA-702 search query abuse by declassifying the April 2017 court opinion written by FISC Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer. Show the FBI contractors behind the 85% fraudulent search queries. [Crowdstrike? Fusion-GPS? Nellie Ohr? Daniel Richman?]  This was a weaponized surveillance and domestic political spying operation. [The trail was laid down in specific detail by Judge Collyer]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
♦ Subpoena former DOJ-NSD (National Security Division) head [[John Carlin]], or haul him in front of a [[grand jury]], and get his testimony about why he hid the abuse from the [[FISA court]] in October 2016; why the DOJ-NSD rushed the Carter Page application to beat NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers to the FISA court; and why Carlin quit immediately thereafter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
♦ Prove the Carter Page FISA application (October 2016) was fraudulent and based on deceptions to the FISA Court. Declassify the entire document, and release the transcripts of those who signed the application(s); and/or depose those who have not yet testified. The creation of the Steele Dossier was the cover-up operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
♦ Release all of the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages without redactions. Let sunlight pour in on the actual conversation(s) that were taking place when Crossfire Hurricane (July ’16) and the FISA Application (Oct ’16) were taking place.  The current redactions were made by the people who weaponized the intelligence system for political surveillance and spy operation.  This is why Page and Strzok texts are redacted!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
♦ Release all of Bruce Ohr 302’s, FBI notes from interviews and debriefing sessions, and other relevant documents associated with the interviews of Bruce Ohr and his internal communications. Including exculpatory evidence that Bruce Ohr may have shared with FBI Agent Joseph Pientka. [And get a deposition from this [[Pientka]] fella] Bruce Ohr is the courier, carrying information from those outside to those on the inside.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
♦ Release the August 2nd, 2017, two-page scope memo provided by DAG Rod Rosenstein to special counsel Robert Mueller to advance the fraudulent Trump investigation, and initiate the more purposeful obstruction of justice investigation. Also Release the October 20th, 2017, second scope memo recently discovered.  The Scope Memos are keys to unlocking the underlying spy/surveillance cover-up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''29 April.''' Rod Rosenstein resigns, effective May 11, 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/RosensteinResignationLetter04292019.pdf?mod=article_inline&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''30 April.''' Patrick Byrne's second meeting with the FBI in the Maria Butina case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===May 2019===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''1 May.''' [[Nellie Ohr]] referred to DOJ for criminal prosecution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/441580-nellie-ohrs-hi-honey-emails-to-doj-about-russia-collusion-should-alarm-us#.XMo3POquQ5U.twitter&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/408347748/Final-Criminal-Referral-Nellie-Ohr-5-1-19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Nellie Ohr had access to the 702 FISA database. Nellie Ohr and Glenn Simpson were the principle authors of the ''[[Steele dossier]]''; Christopher Steel was used to make it appear the information ([[Fourth Amendment]] violations) gathered by illegal FISA surveillance came from outside the US government and from a [[NATO]] allied source.&lt;br /&gt;
*DOJ Reviewing Whether ''Steele Dossier'' Was Russian Disinformation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/01/doj-reviewing-whether-steele-dossier-was-russian-disinformation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Human Events]]'': Checkmate. How President Trump's legal team outfoxed Mueller.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://humanevents.com/2019/05/01/checkmate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Assange extradition hearing begins in [[UK]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/05/02/assange-to-extradition-court-i-wont-surrender-to-the-us-for-doing-journalism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''2 May.''' FBI admits to spying on Trump campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/02/us/politics/fbi-government-investigator-trump.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/02/new-york-times-admits-multiple-spies-deployed-against-trump-campaign/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Trump: James Comey Probably Led the Spying Efforts – Will Find Out. Transcript of Trump interview with Catherine Herridge.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/trump-james-comey-propably-led-the-spying-efforts-will-find-out/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Papadopoulos responds to FBI sting ran against him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlCRQG7McCE&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''RealClearInvestigations'': When Loretta Met Bill on the Tarmac.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/05/02/the_man_who_came_to_the_tarmac.html When Loretta Met Bill on the Tarmac]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CNN Poll: 69% of Americans want the origins of the Obama administration's Trump-Russia collusion hoax investigated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/trending/cnn-poll-overwhelming-majority-want-investigation-into-obama-doj-spying-of-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''3 May.''' [[Devin Nunes]] asks Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Central Intelligence Agency Director Gina Haspel, National Security Agency Director Paul Nakasone and FBI Director Chris Wray to hand over all information on [[Joseph Mifsud]] by May 10.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nunes-casts-doubt-on-muellers-findings-about-papadopoulos-tipsters-moscow-links&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; If Mifsud is not a Russian intelligence asset, the FBI and CIA have a problem within their narrative.  If Mifsud is a Western asset, that proves [[George Papadopoulos]] was set up.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jonathan Moffa]] transcript says the FBI use of spies and other counterintelligence assets in the Trump campaign was far more extensive than has previously been acknowledged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/fbi-official-testimony-surveillance-trump-campaign/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Comey tells KNX radio Los Angeles, {{Quotebox|&amp;quot;at the end of July [2016] we learn that a Trump campaign adviser [Papadopoulos] — two months earlier, before any of this was public — had talked to a Russian representative [Mifsud] about the fact that the Russians had dirt on Hillary Clinton&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://knx1070.radio.com/blogs/exclusive-former-fbi-director-james-comey-russians-will-work-re-elect-trump-2020&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
:*Mifsud is in fact a [[UK]] intelligence operative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/04/all-russiagate-roads-lead-to-london-as-evidence-emerges-of-joseph-mifsuds-links-to-uk-intelligence/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/cjbdingo25/status/997166062423691270?lang=en&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:*If what Comey said were to be true, the fact that a [[KGB]] agent penetrated to the highest levels of [[UK]], US, [[Italian]] and [[NATO]] intelligence for several decades, vetted recruits for UK intelligence, and taught at a NATO school for intelligence agents, is by far a larger scandal than Russia collusion. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Mifsud spoke at a [[State Department]] meeting three weeks after President Trump was inaugurated, and was questioned by the FBI while in [[Washington, D.C.]], shortly after George Papadopoulos' first FBI interview. Mifsud was not detained, and allowed to leave the country.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The &amp;quot;dirt&amp;quot; on Clinton was her communication with President Obama from the territory of Russia on her Blackberry connected to her unsecured server - covered-up by Comey in his July 5, 2016 press conference when he said Clinton had communicated with &amp;quot;another government official.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Ray McGovern: Orwellian Cloud Hovers Over Russia-gate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/05/03/orwellian-cloud-hovers-over-russia-gate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''4 May.'''' FBI ‘lost Notes’ From August 2015 Meeting with IC Inspector General Regarding Hillary Clinton's Private Server.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/how-convenient-fbi-lost-notes-from-august-2015-meeting-with-ic-inspector-general-regarding-hillary-clintons-private-server/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''5 May.''' Susan Bordo: ''The Talented Mr. Comey.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://medium.com/@susanbordo/the-talented-mr-comey-7ad0f3008364&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''6 May.''' Sens. [[Chuck Grassley]] and [[Ron Johnson]] ask AG Bill Barr if the FBI has investigated [[CIA]] leaking during the Russia probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-05-06%20RHJ%20CEG%20to%20IC%20IG%20(leaks).pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Mueller did not investigate whether Russia fed [[Christopher Steele]] false information to interfere in American elections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/06/major-report-omission-shows-mueller-either-incompetent-political-hack/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sharyl Attkisson]]: How Attorney General Barr could change the federal culture of corruption in 60 days.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/442206-how-attorney-general-barr-could-change-the-federal-culture-of-corruption-in&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sharyl Attkisson: U.S. spy agency hikes number of search queries of American calls, texts and emails.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/05/u-s-spy-agency-hikes-number-of-search-queries-of-american-calls-texts-and-emails/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sharyl Attkisson: Justice Department “Kafkaesque” in Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for government computer intrusions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/05/federal-judge-justice-department-kafkaesque-in-attkisson-v-doj-and-fbi-for-government-computer-intrusions/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''7 May.''' Solomon: FBI's Steele story falls apart: False intel and media contacts were flagged before FISA.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/442592-steeles-stunning-pre-fisa-confession-informant-needed-to-air-trump-dirt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Steele informed [[Kathleen Kavalec]] of the State Dept. that the ''Steele dossier'' was bogus.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Kavalec forwarded Steele's information to the FBI;&lt;br /&gt;
:*FBI went ahead with the Carter Page FISA warrant application using Steele's bogus information ten days later anyways.&lt;br /&gt;
*Consortiumnews: How US and Foreign Intel Agencies Interfered in a US Election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/05/07/how-us-and-foreign-intelligence-agencies-interfered-in-a-us-election/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Nadler informed that the previous report content was provided without assertion of [[executive privilege]]; however, if Nadler follows-through with impeachment plan, executive privilege is now enforced and the totality of the Mueller Report is withdrawn from Congress. The only thing AG Barr was statutorily required to provide was the four-page notification letter he already presented. The assertion of executive privilege effectively removes any lack of production action (i.e. the impeachment threat) by Chairman Jerry Nadler.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/07/doj-to-nadler-threaten-barr-with-impeachment-you-get-nothing/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Kevin Brock: James Comey is in trouble and he knows it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/442278-james-comey-is-in-trouble-and-he-knows-it&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*FBI releases 277 pages of the Clinton email investigation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-32-of-32/view&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''8 May.''' Mueller paid $732,000 to outside contractors. [[Glenn Simpson]] ([[Fusion GPS]]) and [[Chris Steele]] may have been paid by Mueller.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/05/08/who_were_the_mueller_reports_hired_guns.html Who Were the Mueller Report's Hired Guns?], By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations, May 9, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. Grassley: “Media…sold a bunch of snake oil” on Trump-Russia probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/05/media-sold-a-bunch-of-snake-oil-sen-grassley-on-trump-russia-probe/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''9 May.''' Solomon: FBI's Steele story falls apart: False intel and media contacts were flagged before FISA.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/442944-fbis-steele-story-falls-apart-false-intel-and-media-contacts-were-flagged&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:0510-pras-obama-sub-instagram-1.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Pras Michel and Barack Obama. Michel was indicted for laundering illegal foreign money donations into the 2012 Obama re-election campaign. There may have been as much $70 million stolen from the impoverished people of Malaysia funneled to Democrat candidates during Obama's second term. The money was stolen by corrupt officials in the Malaysian Ministry of Finance and invested in a phony &amp;quot;green technology&amp;quot; project that never materialized in partnership with Obama's re-election committee finance chairman.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''10 May.''' '''1MDB scandal.''' '''Obama friend [[Pras Michel]] and 1MDB consultant [[Jho Low]] indicted on conspiracy to defraud the United States government and for making foreign and conduit campaign contributions'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/entertainerbusinessman-and-malaysian-financier-indicted-conspiring-make-and-conceal-foreign&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to the indictment,'''between June 2012 and November 2012, Low directed the transfer of approximately $21,600,000 from foreign entities and accounts to Michel for the purpose of funneling significant sums of money into the United States presidential election''' as purportedly legitimate contributions, all while concealing the true source of the money. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To facilitate the excessive contributions and conceal their true source, Michel paid approximately $865,000 of the money received from Low to about 20 straw donors, or conduits, so that the straw donors could make donations in their names to a presidential joint fundraising committee. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In addition, Michel personally directed more than $1 million of the money received from Low to an independent expenditure committee also involved in the presidential election in 2012.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The indictment also alleges that by funneling campaign contributions through straw donors, Michel caused a presidential joint fundraising committee to submit false reports to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), including a false amended report in June 2013.  The committee's reports were false because they identified the straw donors, rather than Low or Michel, as the true source of the contributions.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In addition, the indictment alleges that by contributing more than $1 million of the money he received from Low to an independent expenditure committee,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Michel also caused that committee to submit false reports to the FEC, insofar as those reports identified Michel as the source of the contributions when, in fact, it was Low. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The indictment further alleges that in June 2015, Michel submitted a false declaration to the FEC in which he claimed that he had no reason to conceal the true source of his contributions to the independent expenditure committee in 2012, even though Michel knew that the true source of that money was Low and that Michel had funneled the foreign money into the election.  &lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. Graham sends a letter to both OIG [[Michael Horowitz]] and [[Secretary of State]] [[Mike Pompeo]] seeking additional information about State Department contact with Christopher Steele.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/10/graham-sends-letters-to-horowitz-and-pompeo-fbi-backtracks-on-self-serving-redactions/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Roger Stone]] wants evidence that the Russians hacked the DNC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1126997786136735746&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''11 May.''' IG Horowitz Has 'Concluded that the Final Three FISA Extensions Were Illegally Obtained,' diGenova Says.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/video/digenova-ig-horowitz-has-concluded-that-the-final-three-fisa-extensions-were-illegally-obtained/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1126661165772419072&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Kavalec revelations have prompted further investigation into the first FISA warrant. The FBI hid the Kavelec memo from Inspector General Horowitz for two years.&lt;br /&gt;
*Chuck Ross: Analysis: The Steele Dossier And The ‘Raw Intelligence’ Canard.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/11/steele-dossier-raw-intelligence/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Epoch Times'': Obama White House Knew About Clinton Emails Years Earlier Than Previously Admitted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/obama-white-house-knew-about-clinton-emails-years-earlier-than-previously-admitted_2919450.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''12 May.''' Ratcliffe: James Comey “under investigation for violations of the espionage act”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/12/ratcliffe-james-comey-under-investigation-for-violations-of-the-espionage-act/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump Calls Out FBI Director Christopher Wray: “the director is protecting the coup gang”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/12/president-trump-calls-out-fbi-director-christopher-wray-the-director-is-protecting-the-coup-gang/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Obama White House kept tabs on a [[FOIA]] request for information on Hillary Clinton's emails that was improperly rejected by the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The State Department claimed in May 2013 in response to the FOIA request that no responsive records existed. The agency’s internal watchdog later determined that denial to be ‘inaccurate and incomplete’ since Clinton used a personal email account to conduct State Department business.&lt;br /&gt;
:*These documents suggest the Obama White House knew about the Clinton email lies being told to the public at least as early as December 2012.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/12/obama-white-house-hillary-clinton-emails-foia/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''13 May.''': ''Associated Press'': Top Federal Prosecutor in Connecticut to Review Origins of Russia Probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/top-federal-prosecutor-in-connecticut-to-review-origins-of-russia-probe_2922656.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Relates to the [[James A. Baker (DOJ)]] case.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Sara Carter: Minefield? If Barr Has Any Intention Of Prosecuting FISA Abuses, He Should Stay Clear Of IG Report'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/mine-field-if-barr-has-any-intention-of-prosecuting-fisa-abuses-he-should-stay-clear-of-ig-report/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Consortiumnews'': Sweden Reopens 9-Year Old Rape Investigation Against Julian Assange; Seeks His Arrest and Extradition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/05/13/sweden-reopens-9-year-old-rape-investigation-against-assange-seeks-his-extradition/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff Carlson: As Rosenstein Leaves DOJ, How Will History Judge Him?.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/05/13/as-rosenstein-leaves-doj-how-will-history-judge-him/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Gatewaypundit'': Obama State Department's [[Jonathan Winer]] – Long Time Kerry Associate – Involved in Sinister Actions Pushing Fake Russia Dossier.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/05/breaking-obama-state-departments-jonathan-winer-long-time-kerry-associate-involved-in-sinister-actions-pushing-fake-russia-dossier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''14 May.''' Graham Seeks Communications Between State Dept. Official and Dossier Author.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/investigation-on-russia-probe-origins-intensifies-as-bombshell-memo-emerges_2919512.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Steele’s Meeting With US Official Casts Doubts on FBI’s Official Story.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/memo-shows-steele-revealed-bias-ahead-of-fisa-warrant_2922391.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Rosenstein Defends Mueller Appointment, Rips Into Comey.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/rosenstein-defends-mueller-appointment-rips-into-comey_2923473.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Daily Signal'': 6 Things to Know About the Prosecutor Investigating Spying on Trump Campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/05/14/6-things-to-know-about-the-prosecutor-investigating-spying-on-trump-campaign/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Epoch Times'': US Attorney Probing Spying on Trump Campaign Draws on Vast Experience.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/attorney-probing-trump-campaign-spying-once-exposed-one-of-the-greatest-failures-in-fbi-history_2923495.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Investment Watchblog'': Special Prosecutor John Durham, Assigned by AG Barr, Already Working on the Case from Before October 3rd, 2018?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/special-prosecutor-john-durham-assigned-by-ag-barr-already-working-on-the-case-from-before-october-3rd-2018/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''16 May.''' Chuck Ross: Steele Identified Russian Dossier Sources, Notes Reveal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/16/steele-dossier-sources-state-department/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The Kavalec notes indicate Steele claimed the Russians, Vyacheslav Trubnikov and Vladislav Surkov, were “sources” for the ''Steele dossier''. Trubnikov and Surkov were not identified by name in the ''Steele’s dossier''.  Trubnikov, the former head of the SVR, has links to Stefan Halper.  &lt;br /&gt;
::*Stefan Halper arranged for Trubnikov to visit intelligence seminars at the University of Cambridge on May 4, 2012, and May 11, 2015. He also tapped Trubnikov to contribute to a study he did in 2015 for the Pentagon’s [[Office of Net Assessment]] (ONA)  published in 2015. &lt;br /&gt;
::*[[Bruce Ohr]] told Congress in 2018 that Steele told him during a July 30, 2016 meeting that a former head of the SVR had told someone that the Russian government “had Donald Trump over a barrel.”&lt;br /&gt;
;*The notes contain several inaccuracies, including that Russia was running operations out of its consulate in Miami. As Kavalec pointed out, Russia does not have a consulate in Miami.&lt;br /&gt;
:*There is no evidence the compromising material mentioned in the dossier actually exists, raising questions about whether Steele was given disinformation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''20 May.''' Doug Collins releases transcripts of [[Andrew McCabe]], [[Loretta Lynch]], [[James Rybicki]], [[Trisha Beth Anderson]], [[George Toscas]], [[Jonathan Moffa]], John Giaclone (McCabe's predecessor at the start of Mid Year Exam), [[Sally Moyer]] and William F. Sweeney Jr. (Sweeney is the whistleblower in the FBI New York field office who contacted Toscas to move FBI Headquarters off the ball regarding the [[Weiner laptop]] in late October 2016, prompting Comey to re-open the Clinton email investigation).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dougcollins.house.gov/transparency&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''22 May.''' [[Devin Nunes]] publicly asks President Trump to question UK Prime Minister [[Theresa May]] on UK intelligence involvement in [[Spygate]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/411153709/Devin-Nunes-letter-to-President-Trump-regarding-dossier&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Hours later, UK Prime Minister Theresa May resigns, effective the day after President Trump's UK state visit.&lt;br /&gt;
*Paul Sperry:  According to Main DOJ sources, Durham's portfolio for looking into the provenance of CH [Crossfire Hurricane] includes examining docs generated by an interagency &amp;quot;fusion cell&amp;quot; Brennan set up in mid-2016 on Russian election interference + pre-election briefings Steele gave to UK intelligence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1131258194003726336?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*John Solomon files motion to publicize FISA records. Solomon has reason to suspect that the court knows of serious misconduct by multiple government attorneys appearing before the FISA court. If the government can lie without consequence to a court charged with supervising the FBI’s surveillance of Americans, that operates as a ''[[de facto]]'' repeal of the constitutional amendment prohibiting warrantless search and seizure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20190731091845/https://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Misc%2019-01%20Motion%20of%20John%20Solomon%20and%20Southeastern%20Legal%20Foundation%20for%20Publication%20of%20Records%20190523.pdf John Solomon and Southeastern Legal Foundation's Motion for Publication of Records].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The Motion is seeking rulings, orders and opinions issued by the Court finding any of the attorneys associated with the Carter Page FISA applications violated rules of the Court or rules governing professional conduct by attorneys.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.slfliberty.org/single-post/2019/05/22/FISA-Motion-Filed-John-Solomon---Public-Trust-in-Justice&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''23 May.''' '''Declassification order. President Trump granted Attorney General Bill Barr extensive new authorities to investigate law enforcement and intelligence activities related to the 2016 presidential election'''.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The directive compels cooperation from the Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Attorney General, Secretary of Energy, Director of National Intelligence, and Director of the CIA.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The Secretary of Energy's involvement is likely related to the [[Uranium One scandal]], [[Clinton Foundation]], and Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) issues;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The Secretary of the Treasury's involvement is likely related to the Clinton Foundation and matters related to [[George Papadopoulos]];&lt;br /&gt;
:*members of the [[intelligence community]] are to turn over documents to [[DNI]] [[Dan Coats]], who in turn will give the information to Attorney General Barr. For this purpose the directive effectively places the Attorney General, a member of the [[IC]] who reports to ODNI, over the DNI who now will report all the information to the AG.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://fas.org/blogs/secrecy/2019/05/dni-ag-declass/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Ultimately the final report will be addressed to the American people, not to Congress or the President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Svetlana Lokhova files lawsuit against [[Stefan Halper]], ''The Wall Street Journal'', ''The New York Times'', ''The Washington Post'' and NBC Universal Media (MSNBC) seeking $25 million in damages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.442627/gov.uscourts.vaed.442627.1.0_5.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/28/lawsuit-suggests-spying-trump-campaign-started-early-2016/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) returned a superseding indictment charging [[WikiLeaks]] founder [[Julian Assange]] with 17-counts of violating the Espionage Act and one count of conspiring to violate the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Flawfareblog.us3.list-manage.com%2Ftrack%2Fclick%3Fu%3Dbd822938162e7a18f80368b60%26id%3D2bd3aaa580%26e%3D915a35c247&amp;amp;sa=D&amp;amp;sntz=1&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG4UXyOdM-mpLT3ct662BvmOW0Nqg ''United States vs. Assange''].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''24 May.''' Chopper Presser: President Trump:  &amp;quot;The Attorney General is one of the most respected people in this country and he has been for a long period of time. He is going to look at a lot of documents. Some he might find interesting; maybe he’ll find none interesting.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But for over a year, people have asked me to declassify. So what I’ve done is I’ve declassified everything. He can look. And I hope he looks at the UK, and I hope he looks at Australia, and I hope he looks at Ukraine. I hope he looks at everything, because there was a hoax that was perpetrated on our country. It’s the greatest hoax —&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://publicpool.kinja.com/subject-remarks-by-president-trump-before-marine-one-d-1835013481&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Jerusalem Post'': Report: Declassified Docs Will Show That [[Samantha Power]]'s 2016 Unmasking Efforts Were Related to [[Israel]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/trending/report-declassified-docs-will-show-that-samantha-powers-2016-unmasking-efforts-were-related-to-israel/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*After Trump's declassification directive, [[Jerry Nadler]] collapses at a press conference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''26 May.''' POLL: 98 Percent Say Brennan Is Obstructing Justice By Fighting Declassification.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/poll-98-percent-say-brennan-is-obstructing-justice-by-fighting-declassification/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''27 May.''' SSCI Vice-Chairman Mark Warner Tells Intelligence Community to Defy Barr and Democrats Will Protect Them.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sara Carter: Christopher Steele will not cooperate with DOG review of Russia investigation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/breaking-christopher-steele-will-not-cooperate-with-doj-review-of-russian-investigation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; refuses to be questioned by John Durham.&lt;br /&gt;
:*CTH: The “Secret Research Project” – an IRS List, an NSA Database, and Resulting “Files” on Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/28/the-secret-research-project-an-irs-list-an-nsa-database-and-resulting-files-on-americans/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''28 May.''' Margot Cleveland: Lawsuit Suggests Spying On Trump Campaign Started In Early 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/28/lawsuit-suggests-spying-trump-campaign-started-early-2016/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Australian Ambassador Joe Hockey’s May 2019 letter to US Attorney General offering to assist with investigation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/KerrieYaxley/status/1178799676604047360&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: The “Secret Research Project” – an IRS List, an NSA Database, and Resulting “Files” on Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/28/the-secret-research-project-an-irs-list-an-nsa-database-and-resulting-files-on-americans/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*FISA Court exposes Obama’s abuse of NSA to spy on Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.commdiginews.com/politics-2/obama-white-house-fisa-nsa-prism-spy-americans-2012-119410/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sara Carter: AG Barr Battles Intel Community And FBI. Illegal Surveillance Had Been Going On For Years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/ag-barr-battles-intel-community-and-fbi-illegal-surveillance-had-been-going-on-for-years/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Chuck Ross: Dossier Architects Claimed They Wanted To Protect Identity Of Sources. One Was Unmasked Anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/27/sergei-millian-dossier-fusion-gps/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Epoch Times'': Obama Administration’s Snooping on Journalists’ Phone Records Broader Than Previously Known.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/obama-admins-snooping-on-journalists-phone-records-broader-than-previously-known_2940725.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Daily Caller'': High-Ranking FBI Official Leaked Sealed Information To Journalists, Accepted Gifts From Reporter, Watchdog Found&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/29/fbi-official-leaks-gifts/?utm_medium=email&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''29 May.''' [[FBI]]: Anti-Government, Identity Based, and Fringe Political Conspiracy Theories Very Likely Motivate Some Domestic Extremists to Commit Criminal, Sometimes Violent Activity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/420379775/FBI-Conspiracy-Theory-Redacted&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://publicintelligence.net/fbi-consiracy-theory-domestic-extremism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|'Trump is mentioned by name briefly in the latest FBI document, which notes that the origins of [[QAnon]] is the conspiratorial belief that “Q,” allegedly a government official, “posts classified information online to reveal a covert effort, led by President Trump, to dismantle a conspiracy involving ‘[[deep state]]’ actors and [[globalism|global elites]] allegedly engaged in an [[Jeffrey Epstein|international child sex trafficking ring]].”... the FBI believes [[conspiracy theory]]-driven [[extremist]]s are likely to increase during the [[2020 presidential election]] cycle.'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-documents-conspiracy-theories-terrorism-160000507.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''30 May.''' AG Barr tells [[CBS]] ''This Morning'' Mueller could’ve reached a decision on Democrat obstruction of justice allegations in the final report but declined to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
*''Washington Examiner'': Mark Meadows sends referral to DOJ about mysterious UK communique about Christopher Steele.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/mark-meadows-sends-referral-to-doj-about-mysterious-uk-communique-about-christopher-steele&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''31 May.''' CTH: Flynn Filing Shows Mueller Team Manipulated Transcript in Report.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/31/flynn-filing-shows-mueller-team-manipulated-transcript-in-report/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*CTH: Doug Collins Identifies Peter Strzok as Likely FBI Official Who Leaked Grand Jury Information and Prosecution Declined.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/31/rep-collins-identifies-peter-strzok-as-likely-fbi-official-who-leaked-grand-jury-information-and-prosecution-declined/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*American Thought Leaders: Guilty Until Proven Innocent: Mueller Upends Rule of Law, In Final Appearance—Sidney Powell.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udRqsEa2N9E&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===June 2019===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''1 June.''' Hoft: Deep State Prosecutors Defy Judge's Order: Refuse to Release Transcript of Flynn-Kislyak Call that Will Confirm Obama Spying on Trump Team.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/deep-state-prosecutors-defy-judges-order-refuse-to-release-transcript-of-flynn-kislyak-call-that-will-confirm-obama-spying-on-trump-team/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''2 June.''' ''Epoch Times'': Transcript in Mueller Report Was Selectively Edited to Cast Suspicion on Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/transcript-in-mueller-report-selectively-edited-to-cast-suspicion-on-trump_2947573.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*$50,000.00 Reward in Attkisson v. DOJ nd FBI for Government Computer Intrusions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/06/video-50000-00-reward-in-attkisson-v-doj-and-fbi-for-government-computer-intrusions/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''3 June.''' IG Horowitz investigators begin interviewing Chris Steele for 16 hours over two days.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/09/ig-horowitz-investigators-interviewed-chris-steele-june-3rd-5th-16-hour-session/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*related to follow-up interviews with Kathleen Kavalec,  etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mueller 'star witness' [[George Nader]] indicted on child pornography charges.&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump attorney John Dowd calls Robert Mueller &amp;quot;a fraud&amp;quot; for editing his comments in Mueller report.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/mark-meadows-sends-referral-to-doj-about-mysterious-uk-communique-about-christopher-steele&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/z4zuVFA2h2Q&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Clinton Campaign Has Not Responded in 18 Months to Senate Judiciary Committee's Request For Documents and Answers About Dossier.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/hillary-clintons-campaign-has-not-responded-in-18-months-to-senate-judiciary-committees-request-for-documents-and-answers-about-dossier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sara Carter: FBI Failed to Document Four Clinton Witness Interviews. Barr Should Reopen Clinton Probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/fbi-failed-to-document-four-clinton-witnesses-barr-should-reopen-clinton-probe/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''New York Post'': Julian Assange won't face further charges in US: report.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2019/06/03/julian-assange-wont-face-further-charges-in-us-report/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump 3-day state visit to London begins.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''4 June.''' Chuck Ross: Christopher Steele Reportedly Planning To Meet With US Authorities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/04/christopher-steele-agree-meet-dossier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hoft: Esteemed NSA Whistleblower Bill Binney Says He Has Evidence DNC was NOT Hacked – “The Mueller Report and the Rosenstein Indictment Is All Based on Lies!”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/esteemed-nsa-whistleblower-bill-binney-says-he-has-evidence-dnc-was-not-hacked-the-mueller-report-and-the-rosenstein-indictment-is-all-based-on-lies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hoft: Esteemed NSA Whistleblower Bill Binney Says He Has Evidence DNC was NOT Hacked – “The Mueller Report and the Rosenstein Indictment Is All Based on Lies!”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/esteemed-nsa-whistleblower-bill-binney-says-he-has-evidence-dnc-was-not-hacked-the-mueller-report-and-the-rosenstein-indictment-is-all-based-on-lies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''5 June.''' Jeff Carlson: 5 Discrepancies Call the Accuracy of Mueller's Report Into Question.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/5-discrepancies-call-the-accuracy-of-muellers-report-into-question_2951924.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''6 June.''' Micheal Flynn fires lawyers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/06/michael-flynn-fires-lawyers/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Eric Holder]] is employed in the same law firm of Covington and Burling.&lt;br /&gt;
:*DOJ Releases Flynn FBI Interview Report (FD-302) by [[Joe Pientka]] and Peter Strzok.&lt;br /&gt;
*True the Vote Wins Battle Against IRS as Judge Orders Tax Agency to Pay Legal Fees in Decade-Long Fight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/06/06/true-vote-wins-battle-irs-judge-orders-tax-agency-pay-legal-fees-decade-long-fight/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/08/true-the-vote-wins-historic-2-million-settlement-against-irs/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Catherine Engelbrecht and her organization True the Vote's case is connected to the political surveillance operation used against presidential candidate Donald Trump.  &lt;br /&gt;
:*The 2010 program to weaponize the IRS ([[Obama IRS scandal]]) is the precursor to the 2012 program to weaponize and abuse the NSA's FISA database.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The [[Secret Research Project]] originated as a term in the Obama team. It involved the U.S. Department of Justice under [[Eric Holder]] and the FBI under Robert Mueller. Eric Holder requested over 1 million tax records via CD-ROM: The IRS sent the FBI “21 disks constituting a 1.1 million page database of information from 501(c)(4) tax exempt organizations, to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.” The transaction occurred in October 2010. The evidence within this sketchy operation came directly to the surface in early spring 2012.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2014/12/04/a-transparent-conflict-of-interest-treasury-secretary-jack-lew-blocks-white-houseirs-email-release/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The enforcement mechanism used for targeting includes the DOJ and various other government agencies (ATF, OSHA, EEOC, EPA Banking/Finance).&lt;br /&gt;
:*Cause of Action (CoA) made a [[FOIA]] request  to the IRS for documents shared between the IRS and the White House. The request was to gain documents illegally shared between the White House and the IRS.  &lt;br /&gt;
:*Treasury Secretary Jack Lew blocked the FOIA request from being released, an apparent [[conflict of interest]]. Lew was Wjite House Chief of Staff in 2012 when the Secret Research Project was conceived.&lt;br /&gt;
:*FISA chief judge Rosemary Collyer determined illegal FISA abuse of the NSA database by the FBI, and [[Fourth Amendment]] violations began in 2012, and were the result of &amp;quot;deliberate decision making.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*John Solomon: Key figure that Mueller report linked to Russia was a State Department intel source.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/447394-key-figure-that-mueller-report-linked-to-russia-was-a-state-department&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Paul Sperry: 'Scorched Earth': Mueller's Targets Speak Out.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/05/30/scorched_earth_lives_upturned_muellers_targets_speak_out.html 'Scorched Earth': Mueller's Targets Speak Out], By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations, June 06, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''7 June.''' [[CNN]]: Judge orders FBI to reveal more parts of Comey memos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2019/06/07/politics/judge-order-fbi-reveal-comey-memos-cnn/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Bill Gertz: FBI Counterintelligence Is Focus of Trump Campaign Spying Probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/national-security/fbi-counterintelligence-is-focus-of-trump-campaign-spying-probe/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*FBI Docs Reveal ‘Property’ Related to Hillary Clinton's Use of Private Server ‘Missing’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/how-convenient-newly-released-fbi-docs-reveal-property-related-to-hillary-clintons-use-of-private-server-missing/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Republicans Demand Cummings Hold Cohen Accountable for ‘Perjury-Laden Testimony’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/republicans-demand-cummings-hold-cohen-accountable-for-perjury-laden-testimony/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Elijah Cummings’s Wife Hit With New Allegations Of Self-Dealing And Perjury In Updated IRS Complaint.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/07/cummings-wife-irs-complaint/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''8 June.''' CTH: Judge Rules FBI Must Release Declarations from Lead Mueller FBI Agent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/08/judge-rules-fbi-must-release-declarations-from-lead-mueller-fbi-agent/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Mark Meadows: FBI Knew ‘Within 60 Days’ That Russia Probe Was ‘Built On A Foundation Of Sand’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/08/mark-meadows-fbi-investigation-flimsy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''9 June.''' Mark Meadows: Strzok and McCabe knew Steele dossier not credible before first Carter Page FISA.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''10 June.''' Barr informs Jerrold: “It is now well established that, in 2016, the U.S. government and others undertook certain intelligence-gathering and investigative steps directed at persons associated with the Trump Campaign...there remain open questions relating to the origins of this counter-intelligence investigation and the U.S. and foreign intelligence activities that took place prior to and during that investigation...The Review is broad in scope and multifaceted, and is intended to illuminate open questions regarding the activities of U.S. and foreign intelligence services as well as non-governmental organizations and individuals.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Jonathan Winer]] facilitated meetings between dossier author Christopher Steele and multiple private consulting firms. Winer served as Steele’s main point of contact to the State Department, and was the official responsible for disseminating the anti-Trump dossier through the State Department.&lt;br /&gt;
*Carter Page: John Dean Hearing Showed Democrats In Full Cover-Up Mode.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/10/carter-page-john-dean/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Epoch Times'' Hezbollah's London Bomb-Making Plot, the Iran Nuclear Deal, and Bruce Ohr.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/hezbollahs-london-bomb-making-plot-the-iran-nuclear-deal-and-bruce-ohr_2958118.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Daily Telegraph: Iran-linked terrorists caught stockpiling explosives in north-west London.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/09/iran-linked-terrorists-caught-stockpiling-explosives-north-west/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''11 June.''' FBI must begin producing documents regarding [[Daniel Richman]], the Columbia Law School professor James Comey admitted to using as a go-between to illegally leak classified information to the ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/11/daniel-richman-james-comey/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''12 June.''' ''NYT'' reports John Durham questioning CIA officials about Brennan's fraudulent Intelligence Community Assessment of early January 2017.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/12/us/politics/russia-investigation-cia.html?smtyp=cur&amp;amp;smid=tw-nytpolitics&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In House Intel hearing Devin Nunes Warns FBI Witnesses: ‘The Counterintelligence Department Over at the FBI is in Big Trouble’.&lt;br /&gt;
*Papadopoulos: Anyone who opposed Obama admin was targeted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q9pChEUzMs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Michael Flynn hires Sydney Powell.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/12/breaking-michael-flynn-drops-lawyers-favor-special-counsel-critic/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/01/sidney-powell-discusses-doj-in-the-lawfare-era-guilty-until-proven-innocent/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/udRqsEa2N9E&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump, Jr.]] closed door Senate Intelligence Committee testimony illegally leaked to CNN, another felony violation by Trump [[witch hunt]]ers.&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff Carlson: Meadows: ‘There’s a Cover-up Within Certain Realms at the FBI’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/06/12/meadows-theres-a-cover-up-within-certain-realms-at-the-fbi/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff Carlson: Nunes Details Flaws in Mueller Report, Compares It to Steele Dossier.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/06/12/nunes-details-flaws-in-mueller-report-compares-it-to-steele-dossier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''13 June.''' Ray McGovern: DOJ Bloodhounds on the Scent of John Brennan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/06/13/ray-mcgovern-doj-bloodhounds-on-the-scent-of-john-brennan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''14 June.''' 23 House members suspect DOJ cover-up is in progress, request prompt declassification of FISA evidence by President Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/RepMoBrooks/status/1139617722562699264&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Epoch Times'': The Hezbollah Cover-Up, and Bruce Ohr Connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-hezbollah-cover-up-and-bruce-ohr-connection_2963485.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''15 June.''' CTH: DOJ Admits FBI Never Saw Crowdstrike Report on DNC Russian Hacking Claim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/15/doj-admits-fbi-never-saw-crowdstrike-report-on-dnc-russian-hacking-claim/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Lawyers for [[Roger Stone]] requested the full Crowdstrike report on the DNC hack.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Not only did the FBI not review the DNC server, the FBI/DOJ never even saw the Crowdstrike report.&lt;br /&gt;
:*FBI and DOJ were only allowed to see a “draft” report prepared by Crowdstrike, and that report was redacted. That redacted draft is the “last version of the report produced”; meaning, there are no unredacted &amp;amp; final versions.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The FBI and DOJ, and all claims by the intelligence community, including the 2017 ''Intelligence Community Assessment'' to President Obama, the final Mueller Report, [[Mueller show trials|Mueller team indictments]], and illegal [[IC]] [[fake news]] [[leak]]s to [[mainstream media]] were based on taking the word of a hired contractor for the [[Democrat party]].&lt;br /&gt;
:*No evidence of 'Russia hacked the DNC'.&lt;br /&gt;
*Paul Sperry:  House GOP leadership has soured on Comey replacement Wray. They r now convinced Wray's not part of the FBI cleanup &amp;amp; not cooperating w AG Barr &amp;amp; is in fact part of the cover-up of #SpyGate scandal after burying documents &amp;amp; refusing to make people available for interview.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1139724511069106176?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''17 June.''' Hoft:  ROGER STONE Files Two Court Documents – BLASTS FBI and Mueller's False Allegations that Russians Gave DNC Emails to WikiLeaks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/huge-development-roger-stone-files-two-court-documents-blasts-fbi-and-muellers-false-allegations-that-russians-gave-dnc-emails-to-wikileaks/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Ray McGovern: FBI Never Saw CrowdStrike Unredacted or Final Report on Alleged Russian Hacking Because None was Produced.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/06/17/fbi-never-saw-crowdstrike-unredacted-or-final-report-on-alleged-russian-hacking-because-none-was-produced/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*DOJ Appears to Block Manafort Transfer to Rikers Island.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/17/nyregion/manafort-rikers.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''19 June.''' At least 15 people violated State Department rules in Hillary Clinton email scandal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gcVobNw3Fs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sara Carter: Death Threats Against Page And The Dangerous Disinformation Operation Against Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/death-threats-against-page-and-the-dangerous-disinformation-operation-against-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''20 June.''' CTH: Justice Dept. Allows Congress to View Rosenstein Scope Memos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/20/justice-dept-allows-congress-to-view-rosenstein-scope-memos/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Mueller Gang Used Same AP Reporters to Set Up Manafort who were Also Connected to Fusion GPS.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/exclusive-corrupt-mueller-gang-used-same-ap-reporters-to-set-up-manafort-who-were-also-connected-to-fusion-gps/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*TRUMP to Hannity: DOJ Working to Determine if Obama Intel Agencies Were Secretly Monitoring His Phone in 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/trump-to-hannity-doj-working-to-determine-if-obama-intel-agencies-were-secretly-monitoring-his-phone-in-2016/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Special Counsel Case Against Russian Company Takes A Page Out Of The Soviet Handbook.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/20/special-counsel-case-russian-company-takes-page-soviet-handbook/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''21 June.''' FBI Raids Clinton Campaign Co-Chair's Home.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/449720-fbi-raids-home-of-dc-council-member-as-part-of-federal-grand&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Weissmann signs $25 million book deals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/21/us/politics/andrew-weissmann-book-deal.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''22 June.''' Hoft: General Flynn Uncovered Massive Clinton Scandal Linked to Terrorist Funding – Was Immediately Targeted by Obama Deep State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/breaking-general-flynn-uncovered-massive-clinton-scandal-linked-to-terrorist-funding-was-immediately-targeted-by-obama-deep-state/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''23 June.''' Devin Nunes Notes: “Two Parallel Tracks” Used To Target Donald Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/qtEf8_YALVs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Trey Gowdy: Mystery FBI Transcript ‘Actually Changed My Perspective’ Of Russia Probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/23/trey-gowdy-transcript-mueller-papadopoulos/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*“I was supportive of [Robert] Mueller. I was supportive of the idea to initiate, to investigate what Russia did, but when I saw this transcript, it actually changed my perspective.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:*FBI Was Giving Different Intelligence Briefings to Candidate Trump than to Candidate Clinton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/ng10lxGlFSA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''New York Times'' fed false anti-Trump information to the FBI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zkw5Y5sMKiA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''24.''' CTH: DOJ Confirms Flynn Defense Team Never Received Transcript of Flynn/Kislyak Phone Call.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/24/doj-confirms-flynn-defense-team-never-received-transcript-of-flynn-kislyak-phone-call/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*CTH: Michael Flynn Was Not “Unmasked” – Evidence Flynn Was Under Active, FISC Authorized, Surveillance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/24/michael-flynn-was-not-unmasked-evidence-flynn-was-under-active-fisc-authorized-surveillance/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''25 June.''' Jay Sekulow: Obama administration's anti-Trump actions revealed/&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/jay-sekulow-obama-administrations-anti-trump-actions-revealed-in-newly-disclosed-documents&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*the Obama administration stepped up efforts – just days before President Trump took office – to undermine Trump and his administration.&lt;br /&gt;
:*the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, under James Clapper, eagerly pushed to get new procedures as part of an anti-Trump effort. The procedures increased access to raw signals intelligence before the conclusion of the Obama administration, just days before President Trump was inaugurated.&lt;br /&gt;
:*By greatly expanding access to classified information by unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats, the Obama administration paved the way for a shadow government to leak classified information – endangering our national security and severely jeopardizing the integrity and reputation of our critical national security apparatus – in an attempt to undermine President Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
:*the Office of the Director of National Intelligence rushed to get the new “procedures signed by the Attorney General before the conclusion of this administration,” referring to the Obama administration.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The documents also reveal that Robert Litt, who worked in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, told the Office of the :*Undersecretary of Defense’s Director of Intelligence Strategy, Policy, &amp;amp; Integration: “Really want to get this done … and so does the Boss.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*NSA officials discussed that they “could have a signature from the AG as early as this week, certainly prior to the 20th of Jan.” In other words, certainly before President Trump’s inauguration.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mueller Collusion Hoax.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Russiagate conspiracy theorists Jerrold Nadler and Adam Schiff.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Robert Mueller Will Testify July 17th – Nadler and Schiff Pretend Phony Subpoena.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/25/robert-mueller-will-testify-july-17th-nadler-and-schiff-pretend-phony-subpoena/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*to frame the narrative for the appearance Nadler and Schiff sign a letter that “threatened” a subpoena.  This subpoena letter is a prop for a pre-planned theatrical event.  Only Schiff and Nadler signed the letter, no coordination with ranking members.  It’s an optic to set the cornerstone for a narrative that Schiff and Nadler want Mueller’s appearance.&lt;br /&gt;
:*the joint committee approach is also part of the strategy.  With 40 members from both committees there will intentionally only be ONE ROUND of questions.  The size of the committee is part of the design to protect Robert Mueller. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller was in deep discussions with Schiff and Nadler to coordinate the appearance, the letter and the size of the committee are the first two immediate flares that indicate a staged performance is being set-up.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Politico Playbook PM:'' What the Mueller hearing means for Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook-pm/2019/06/26/what-the-mueller-hearing-means-for-democrats-450969?nname=playbook-pm&amp;amp;nid=0000015a-dd3e-d536-a37b-dd7fd8af0000&amp;amp;nrid=00000162-fcf3-d4aa-a366-fcfbd38e0000&amp;amp;nlid=964328&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''26 June.''' ACLJ: Samantha Power Slammed Trump In Private Email Exchanges With Media During 2016 Election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/aclj-samantha-power-slammed-trump-to-media-during-2016-election-in-new-unearthed-emails/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Margot Cleveland: Michael Flynn Attorney Suggests Special Counsel Withheld Key Information From His Defense.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/26/michael-flynn-attorney-suggests-special-counsel-withheld-key-information-defense/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Judicial Watch Caught Mueller FBI/Obama DOJ Working w/ Lois Lerner's IRS Prosecuting Conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4T8wt00gIn4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''IWB:'' President Trump rips @Twitter, @Google and @Facebook for trying to rig the 2020 election against conservatives. #BigTech #censor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/president-trump-rips-twitter-google-and-facebook-for-trying-to-rig-the-2020-election-against-conservatives-bigtech-censor/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''27 June.''' Citizens Grand Jury indicts Robert Mueller on 9 counts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1IhWNbuAD4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vWce9xTOCU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''29 June.''' Sundance questions for Mueller:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/06/26/dershowitz-democrats-will-regret-calling-mueller-to-testify/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*On May 16, 2017, were you applying to become FBI Director?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Why did you go to the White House?&lt;br /&gt;
:*When did Rod Rosenstein contact you about going to the White House?&lt;br /&gt;
:*When did Rod Rosenstein first contact you about becoming special counsel?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Did you speak to any members of the DOJ or FBI prior to going to the White House?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Were there conversations about a possible ‘special counsel position’ prior to May 16th, 2017?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Were you aware President Trump was under investigation prior to your conversation of May 16th, with President Trump?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Were you aware of the nature of the investigation, prior to May 16, 2017?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Were you aware of the possibility of being appointed ‘special counsel’?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Did you take any recording devices into the Oval Office meeting?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Did you own the cell phone you left in the Oval Office on May 16, 2017?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Between the afternoon Oval Office meeting and the next day announcement to the Gang-of-Eight by Rod Rosenstein and Andrew McCabe, when exactly did you agree to become special counsel?&lt;br /&gt;
:*How did Rod Rosenstein contact you between May 16, 2017 and early morning May 17, 2017, about becoming special counsel?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Did you immediately agree to become special counsel when asked?&lt;br /&gt;
:*How much time transpired between Rosenstein asking you to become special counsel and your acceptance of the position?&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sharyl Attkisson]]: Smearing WikiLeaks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/06/smearing-wikileaks/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*China hacked Hillary Clinton's Chappaqua email server; FBI never investigated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5-2ynTUUVE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''30 June.''' Hoft: Russians Used in Steele Dossier Identified – Both are Western Intel Assets Who Do Not Live in Russia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/must-read-exclusive-russians-used-in-steele-dossier-identified-both-are-deep-state-assets-who-did-not-live-in-russia/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===July 2019===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''1 July.''' Ratcliffe: “Horowitz Investigative Work is Complete”.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CIA]] Seems Highly Concerned – [[Washington Post]] Reports on Sketchy [[Joseph Mifsud]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/01/cia-seems-highly-concerned-washington-post-reports-on-sketchy-joseph-mifsud/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The conversation between Mifsud and [[Papadopoulos]], eventually relayed by Australian diplomat [[Alexander Downer]] to U.S. government officials, was cited by special counsel [[Robert S. Mueller III]] as the event that set in motion the FBI probe into ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mifsud worked with and trained FBI officials.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mifsud is a Western intelligence asset.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/04/all-russiagate-roads-lead-to-london-as-evidence-emerges-of-joseph-mifsuds-links-to-uk-intelligence/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Margot Cleveland: Here's What Republicans Should Ask Robert Mueller When He Testifies/&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/01/heres-republicans-ask-robert-mueller-testifies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*there was no underlying crime to obstruct; &lt;br /&gt;
:*Trump knew there was no underlying crime, yet the press, with the aid of leakers, pushed the collusion story, affecting Trump’s governance; &lt;br /&gt;
:*the theories of obstruction are easily refuted; &lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller failed to follow the special counsel regulations that required him to make a charging or declination decision; :*the special counsel’s theory of criminal liability is debatable; &lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller inverted the standard governing prosecutorial decisions from a [[presumption of innocence]] to a presumption of guilty. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Are you familiar with the regulations governing the special counsel? And 28 C.F.R. CFR § 600.8(c), expressly provides “at the conclusion of the Special Counsel’s work, he or she shall provide the Attorney General with a confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions reached by the Special Counsel,” doesn’t it? And when the word “shall” is used in a statute or regulation, it is a command, isn’t it? It means “must?”&lt;br /&gt;
::*Yet, in Part 2 of the special counsel report, you did not make a “prosecution” decision, did you? And you did not make a “declination decision” did you? Would you agree, that the very prosecutorial function, and the power to convene grand juries, serves only one purpose, to determine, yes or no, whether the alleged conduct was criminal or non-criminal? Would you agree that a prosecutor’s function is not to collect information and throw it out to the public?&lt;br /&gt;
::*when did you first realize it was unlikely that you would find evidence of collusion? When did you concluded there was no evidence of collusion? How long did you continue to investigation possible obstruction after you concluded there was insufficient evidence of collusion to recommend charges? When did you decide you would not make a prosecution or declination decision on obstruction?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Yet, after you decide not to render a decision on obstruction, you continued to the special counsel investigation, correct? &lt;br /&gt;
::*Would you agree that a prosecutor’s function is not to collect information and throw it out to the public?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller Failed to Investigate Whether Russia Fed Steele Info to Affect the Election&lt;br /&gt;
:*you discussed Russia’s efforts to interfere in the election via social media in the report but you did not mention even once the possibility that Russia interfered in our election by peddling false intel to Steele, did you?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller Omitted or Misrepresented Information in the Special Counsel Report&lt;br /&gt;
::*“Ukrainian businessman Konstantin Kilimnik, who worked for Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, is tied to Russian intelligence. But hundreds of pages of government documents—which special counsel Robert Mueller possessed since 2018—describe Kilimnik as a ‘sensitive’ intelligence source for the U.S. State Department who informed on Ukrainian and Russian matters.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*“In discussing Page’s background,” Weingarten wrote, “the Mueller report notes his contacts with Russian agents, who supposedly tried to recruit him as an asset, beginning in 2013. The report notes that those agents were charged by U.S. authorities in 2015. What the Mueller report omits is that Page effectively served as an FBI asset in helping the bureau make the case against at least one of the agents.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*you highlight various individuals’ connections to Russia. Did your report also indicate whether any of those individuals had previously served as intelligence sources or informants for America or her allies? To your knowledge, did any of the individuals identified in your report as being connected to Russia also serve as intelligence sources, asset or informants for the United States?&lt;br /&gt;
::*If an individual connected to Russia had also served as an intelligence source, assets, or informant for our country, wouldn’t that negate the sinister implication their connections to Russia might otherwise suggest? Yet those facts were not included in your report, were they?&lt;br /&gt;
::*Mueller failed to “mention that Veselnitskaya (i) worked with Fusion GPS on behalf of Russian clients, and (ii) met with Simpson the morning of the Trump Tower meeting, as well as the night before and after it . . . Also unclear, and undisclosed, is why the Justice Department granted Veselnitskaya special entry to the United States multiple times in 2015 and 2016.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*the special counsel references to contacts between Roger Stone and Trump campaign advisor Michael Caputo “with a Russian citizen named Henry Oknyansky. Oknyansky and an associate supposedly came to Stone by way of Caputo seeking to sell ‘derogatory information’ on Hillary Clinton. Stone rebuffed them. Left unstated: Oknyansky, according to federal court filings and 14 visa waivers, has been an FBI informant for nearly two decades.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*There is no mention of dossier-author Steele, or Stefan Halper, the spy who made contact with both Page and campaign volunteer George Papadopoulos.&lt;br /&gt;
::*according to Mueller, Mifsud “falsely claimed he did not meet with Papadopoulos after his initial introductory meeting” with a woman posing as Putin’s niece. Although the Mueller report noted that “emails, text messages and other documentation showed Mifsud and Papadopoulos did meet at least two other times, as Papadopoulos claimed,” the special counsel did not charge Mifsud for lying to agents&lt;br /&gt;
::*“the Mueller report notes that ‘on May 6, 2016, 10 days after that meeting with Mifsud, Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton.’” But “publicly available information has always shown that Papadopoulos met with Downer on May 10th—and both Downer and the Australian government appear to stand by this date.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*Mueller’s reliance on “the testimony of George Nader, who is mentioned more than 100 times in the Mueller report.” Nader’s role involved arranging “a meeting between Kirill Dmitriev, a Russian national who heads Russia’s sovereign wealth fund, and Erik Prince, the founder of Blackwater, during the transition period following the 2016 presidential election.”  While the FBI succeeded in arresting Nader when he returned to the states, the failure to charge him earlier could have instead allowed a child predator to go free.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Then came Nader’s June 3, 2019 arrest on child pornography charges. As details emerged, it appeared that the FBI knew Nader had child pornography on his cell phones at the time he was cooperating with the special counsel team. Yet he was not indicted until after he had already left the country.  While the FBI succeeded in arresting Nader when he returned to the states, the failure to charge him earlier could have instead allowed a child predator to go free. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Which members of your team were involved in making the determination of whether to include the information in the report? And what standard did they use?&lt;br /&gt;
:*Bias Colored Mueller’s Report and Raises Concerns About Conduct&lt;br /&gt;
::*Were you aware when you selected Weissmann to lead your team that he had sent an email to former acting attorney general Sally Yates praising her insubordination to the president? &lt;br /&gt;
::*And did Weissmann select the other team members? Did he have a role in selecting Peter Strzok and Lisa Page?&lt;br /&gt;
::*Mueller sent the attorney general a “snitty” letter—likely written by a staffer—asking Barr to release the executive summary from the special counsel report. Barr refused. Soon after, the press began reporting on claims that members of the special counsel team disagreed with Barr’s synopsis of the report and claimed it was misleading. Barr later released Mueller’s letter, which acknowledged that Barr had accurately summarized the report, but that the press’ reporting was misleading.&lt;br /&gt;
::*isn’t it true that Barr asked the special counsel’s office multiple times to identify grand jury material in the final report? Isn’t it true Barr made that request at least a month before you submitted the final report? Whom did you charge to identify grand jury materials? Did that individual inform you that he or she would not identify the grand jury materials, as Barr had directed?&lt;br /&gt;
::*you wrote a letter to Barr complaining that Barr’s summary was being misrepresented, correct? Yet you agree, don’t you, that Barr’s letter was accurate? Was that letter your idea? Why didn’t you just call Barr? Did you leak to the press information about your disagreement with Barr? Do you know who leaked that information to the press? How many members of your team knew about the letter to Barr and your request to release the executive summaries? Who were those individuals?&lt;br /&gt;
::*Would it be illegal for you to provide that grand jury information to Congress? So the president and attorney general cannot release an unredacted copy of your report to Congress without breaking the law, correct?&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Heather Samuelson]] gave the FBI and a court ordered deposition different stories of when she learned Hillary Clinton used a private email system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WfKymKSpUg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Samuelson destroyed evidence, deleted 33,000 emails, obstructed justice, and received immunity from the DOJ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFiNMNI7qd0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Adam-waldman-1.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Ranking Democrat Sen. Mark Warner of the Senate Intelligence Committee scuttles Oleg Deripaska's willingness to testify. Deripaska was contacted by the FBI in September 2016 and asked to participate in the FBI's Trump-Russia collusion hoax.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''2 July.''' [[Oleg Deripaska]] Confirms He Was Employing Chris Steele in 2016, While Dossier Was Being Assembled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/02/oleg-deripaska-confirms-he-was-employing-chris-steele-in-2016-while-dossier-was-being-assembled-sk/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Deripaska hired Steele at the same time Steele was working with [[Nellie Ohr]] and Fusion GPS to write the ''Steele dossier''.  &lt;br /&gt;
:*Russian oligarch's story could spell trouble for [[Mueller office|Team Mueller]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/451413-russian-oligarchs-story-could-spell-trouble-for-team-mueller&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller was tasked with investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and ignored [[collusion]] between the Clinton campaign, DNC, Obama DOJ, and Oleg Deripaska.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Deripaska is likely Christopher Steele's source for the pee-pee memo.&lt;br /&gt;
::*In 2009 FBI director Robert Mueller requested Deripaska's assistance to retrieve former FBI officer and CIA resource Robert Levinson who was captured in [[Iran]].  The agent assigned to engage Deripaska was [[Andrew McCabe]]; the FBI was attempting to violate the Iran Sanctions Act which forbade U.S. agencies from spending money Iran. Deripaska spent $25 million of his own money.&lt;br /&gt;
::*In September 2016 Andrew McCabe, now FBI Deputy Director, approached Deripaska again to assist framing Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort as a tool of the [[Kremlin]] as part of the FBI's &amp;quot;insurance policy&amp;quot; against Trump's election.  Deripaska once invested $100 million with Manafort in a Ukrainian cable TV venture that failed.  Deripaska sued Manafort, alleging he stole money (Deripaska likely paid Steele to write the pee-pee memo as revenge on Manafort). According to Deripaska, he laughed at the FBI's &amp;quot;insurance policy&amp;quot; scheme telling them: “You are trying to create something out of nothing.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*Deripaska wanted to tell his story to the [[Senate Intel Committee]] in 2017, without immunity, but was blocked.&lt;br /&gt;
::*In 2017 Deripaska was represented by [[Adam Waldman]].  Waldman also represented Christopher Steele.  Sen. [[Mark Warner]], vice chair of the Senate Intel Committee, used Waldman to try and set up a secret off the record meeting with Christopher Steele, a key witness in the Senate Intel Committee's Russian interference probe. Steele refused unless a formal request came in [[bi-partisan]] form with a [[Republican]]'s signature as well.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Download-2.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Vladimir Putin with Oleg Deripaska. The FBI asked Deripaska for assistance peddling the Russia collusion hoax. Andrew McCabe has been the FBI's chief contact with Deripaska since 2009.]]&lt;br /&gt;
::*Mueller omitted any reference to Deripaska in the Manafort indictment.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Mueller did not disclose to Manafort's defense team his professional relationship and [[conflict of interest]] with Deripaska.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''3 July.''' Sara Carter: Who is Joseph Mifsud and What's His Relation to Russia Investigation?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/who-is-joseph-mifsud-and-whats-his-relation-to-russia-investigation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''5 July.''' Sundance: ''[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/05/damn-is-bill-bar-corrupt-also-doj-files-new-last-minute-motion-to-keep-comey-fbi-memo-content-hidden-from-public/ Damn, is Bill Bar Corrupt Also? – DOJ Files New ‘Last Minute’ Motion to Keep Comey FBI Memo Content Hidden From Public…].&lt;br /&gt;
*Catherine Herridge: Reluctant witnesses in FISA abuse probe agree to talk to DOJ inspector general.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/reluctant-witnesses-in-fisa-abuse-probe-agree-to-talk-to-doj-inspector-general&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Likely Kathleen Kavalec.&lt;br /&gt;
*''RealClearInvestigations:'' CrowdStrikeOut: Mueller's Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/07/05/crowdstrikeout_muellers_own_report_undercuts_its_core_russia-meddling_claims.html ''RealClearInvestigations&amp;quot;'' CrowdStrikeOut: Mueller’s Own Report Undercuts Its Core Russia-Meddling Claims.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The report claims that the interference operation occurred “principally” on two fronts: Russian military intelligence officers hacked and leaked embarrassing Democratic Party documents, and a government-linked troll farm orchestrated a sophisticated and far-reaching social media campaign that denigrated Hillary Clinton and promoted Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
:*But a close examination of the report shows that none of those headline assertions are supported by the report’s evidence or other publicly available sources. They are further undercut by investigative shortcomings and the conflicts of interest of key players involved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTkK-DSeFNs&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The report's timeline of events appears to defy logic. According to its narrative, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced the publication of Democratic Party emails not only before he received the documents but before he even communicated with the source that provided them.  There is strong reason to doubt Mueller’s suggestion that an alleged Russian cutout called Guccifer 2.0 supplied the stolen emails to Assange.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Mueller’s decision not to interview Assange – a central figure who claims Russia was not behind the hack – suggests an unwillingness to explore avenues of evidence on fundamental questions.&lt;br /&gt;
::*U.S. intelligence officials cannot make definitive conclusions about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee computer servers because they did not analyze those servers themselves. Instead, they relied on the forensics of CrowdStrike, a private contractor for the DNC that was not a neutral party, much as “Russian dossier” compiler Christopher Steele, also a DNC contractor, was not a neutral party. This puts two Democrat-hired contractors squarely behind underlying allegations in the affair – a key circumstance that Mueller ignores.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Further, the government allowed CrowdStrike and the Democratic Party's legal counsel to submit redacted records, meaning CrowdStrike and not the government decided what could be revealed or not regarding evidence of hacking.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Mueller’s report conspicuously does not allege that the Russian government carried out the social media campaign. Instead it blames, as Mueller said in his closing remarks, &amp;quot;a private Russian entity&amp;quot; known as the Internet Research Agency (IRA).&lt;br /&gt;
::*Mueller also falls far short of proving that the Russian social campaign was sophisticated, or even more than minimally related to the 2016 election. As with the collusion and Russian hacking allegations, Democratic officials had a central and overlooked hand in generating the alarm about Russian social media activity.&lt;br /&gt;
::*John Brennan, then director of the CIA, played a seminal and overlooked role in all facets of what became Mueller’s investigation: the suspicions that triggered the initial collusion probe; the allegations of Russian interference; and the intelligence assessment that purported to validate the interference allegations that Brennan himself helped generate. Yet Brennan has since revealed himself to be, like CrowdStrike and Steele, hardly a neutral party -- in fact a partisan with a deep animus toward Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-05/crowdstrikeout-muellers-own-report-undercuts-its-core-russia-meddling-claims&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''6 July.''' Two time convicted [[pedophile]] [[Jeffrey Epstein]] arrested on charges of sex trafficking with three dozen minors between 2002 and 2005; Epstein was an informant for Mueller's FBI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/06/report-jeffrey-epstein-arrested-for-sex-trafficking-and-conspiracy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Epstein is a billionaire megadonor to Democrats.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Maurene Comey]], daughter of James Comey, is one of the prosecutors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''8 July.''' Margot Cleveland: How Having Mueller's No. 2 Testify To Congress Will Hurt Democrats More Than Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/08/muellers-no-2-testify-congress-will-hurt-democrats-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Clinton donor and illegal [[leak]]er [[Andrew Weissmann]] to testify in private July 18, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*''Epoch Times'': Will CIA Come Clean on Spygate?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNeD-s54IK0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*RAY McGOVERN: Ex-FBI, CIA Officials Draw Withering Fire on Russiagate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/07/08/ray-mcgovern-ex-fbi-cia-officials-draw-withering-fire-on-russiagate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hoft: Judicial Watch Uncovers Clinton Attorney Samuelson Interview with FBI – Indicates Hillary's Emails Were Altered and Other Crimes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/breaking-exclusive-judicial-watch-uncovers-clinton-attorney-samuelson-interview-with-fbi-which-indicates-attempts-made-to-alter-hillarys-emails-and-other-crimes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*OANN: Clinton Library Refuses to Hand Over Information on Bill Clinton's Ties to Jeffrey Epstein.&amp;lt;/&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1148197730512228353&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''9 July.''' CTH: DOJ Reverses Course in [[FARA]] Case – Calls Flynn “co-conspirator”, Doesn't Want Flynn Testimony – Judge Sullivan Intervenes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/09/doj-reverses-course-in-fara-case-calls-flynn-co-conspirator-doesnt-want-flynn-testimony-judge-sullivan-intervenes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sara Carter: Michael Flynn’s New Brief Shines Sunlight On Prosecutor’s Tactics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/michael-flynns-new-brief-shines-sunlight-on-prosecutors-tactics/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Chuck Ross: Prosecutors Reveal ‘Surprising Last-Minute Development’ In Case Against Michael Flynn’s Ex-Lobbying Partner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/09/michael-flynn-conspirator-turkish-lobbying/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Daily Caller:'' Intelligence Entrepreneur Joel Zamel Speaks Out For First Time Since Mueller Investigation/&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/09/exclusive-intelligence-entrepreneur-joel-zamel-speaks-out-for-first-time-since-mueller-investigation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Federalist:'' New Report: Mueller Lacks Substantiating Evidence Of Russian Election Interference.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/08/new-report-mueller-lacks-evidence-of-russian-election-interference/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*IWB: The Justice Department's Inspector General Doesn't Need to Delay Issuing the Report on FBI Abuse of the FISA Court.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/the-justice-departments-inspector-general-doesnt-need-to-delay-issuing-the-report-on-fbi-abuse-of-the-fisa-court/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Federal Judge Dabney Friedrich rebuked Robert Mueller and the DOJ for falsely suggesting the IRA (Internet Research Agency) and Concord Management and Company, the so-called Russian troll farms, were linked to the Russian government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/in-major-blow-to-mueller-federal-judge-rebukes-mueller-and-doj-for-falsely-claiming-russian-bot-farm-linked-to-russian-government/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Politico'' reports: Trump dossier author Steele gets 16-hour DOJ grilling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/09/ig-horowitz-investigators-interviewed-chris-steele-june-3rd-5th-16-hour-session/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Paul Craig Roberts: Does Trump Have the Balls to Hold the Deep State Accountable?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2019/07/09/does-trump-have-the-balls-to-hold-the-deep-state-accountable/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''10 July.''' Larry C. Johnson: Mueller Does Not Have Evidence That The IRA Was Part of Russian Government Meddling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/larry-c-johnson-mueller-does-not-have-evidence-that-the-ira-was-part-of-russian-government-meddling/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Emoluments Clause Case Against Trump Dismissed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/10/emoluments-clause-case-trump-dismissed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''11 July.'''  DOJ Attorney Says Russian Government Had Nothing To Do With Troll Farms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/11/doj-attorney-says-russian-government-nothing-troll-farms/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*A newly released transcript reveals details of a humiliating hearing that took place the day before Robert Mueller’s puzzling press conference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''12 July.''' Realclearinvestigations: [[Isikoff]] Spins His Own Russian Conspiracy Theories—Again.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/07/12/isikoff_spins_his_own_russian_conspiracy_theories_--_again_140764.html?utm_source=rcp-today&amp;amp;utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_campaign=mailchimp-newsletter Isikoff Spins His Own Russian Conspiracy Theories -- Again.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''13 July.''' CTH: Flynn Case Highlights Multiple 2016 “Insurance Policy” Motives by DOJ and FBI Operatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/13/flynn-case-highlights-multiple-2016-insurance-policy-motives-by-doj-and-fbi-operatives/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''14 July.''' Nunes warns Barr: Without prosecutions none “will trust the FBI or DOJ for generations”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/14/devin-nunes-has-a-warning-for-ag-bill-barr-without-prosecutions-none-will-trust-the-fbi-or-doj-for-generations/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*“These are all a bunch of dirty cops”&lt;br /&gt;
:*Weissman was briefed on the Steele dossier in the summer of 2016&lt;br /&gt;
:*Weissmann’s early involvement with the chain of custody, according to legal advice Nunes received, effectively disqualified him from serving on Mueller’s team.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''15 July.''' Hoft: Developing: Obama and His Italian Friend Renzi Suspected of Spying on Trump and Using Italian State Secrecy Decree to Cover It Up.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/developing-obama-and-his-italian-friend-renzi-suspected-of-spying-on-trump-and-using-italian-state-secrecy-decree-to-cover-it-up/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Lawsuit Claims Julian Assange Confirmed DNC Emails Received From Seth Rich – Not a Russian Hack.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lawflog.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019.07.15-Amended-complaint-stamped.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Fox News news analyst Ellen Ratner relayed information from Wikileaks founder Julian Assange to Texas businessman Ed Butowsky regarding Seth Rich’s role in transferring emails to Wikileaks, according to an amended lawsuit filed this morning on behalf of Mr. Butowsky. Although Ms. Ratner appears on Fox News, she is by no means a Republican or a conservative, and her role in the [[Seth Rich]] saga (like that of journalist Sy Hersh) obliterates the Democratic narrative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lawflog.com/?p=2210&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Billionaire Thiel: Google ‘seemingly committing treason’ with Chinese military; calls for federal investigation into spies and more.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://americanmilitarynews.com/2019/07/billionaire-thiel-google-seemingly-committing-treason-with-chinese-military-calls-for-federal-investigation-into-spies-and-more/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''16 July.''' Tracy Beanz: New information from Ed Butowski.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88HoWDr7-Bk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://uncoverdc.com/2019/07/16/new-developments-in-the-seth-rich-case/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Daily Caller:'' House Republicans Request Documents From Investigation Into Embattled Washington D.C. Democrat Jack Evans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/16/house-republicans-request-documents-investigation-jack-evans/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''17 July.''' Peru Ex-President Arrested in U.S. Bizarre Clinton Foundation Connection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Ye7THyRIaA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''True Pundit'': FBI Rocked By Public Suicide of TOP FBI Agent Who Investigated Clinton Foundation;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://truepundit.com/fbi-rocked-by-public-suicide-of-top-fbi-agent-who-investigated-clinton-foundation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''New York Post:'' FBI agent brother to cop accused of murder-for-hire plot, dead by suicide: sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2019/07/24/fbi-agent-brother-to-cop-accused-of-murder-for-hire-plot-dead-by-suicide-sources/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''18 July.''' Margot Cleveland: Here’s Your Guide To The Latest Wild Developments With Michael Flynn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/18/heres-guide-latest-wild-developments-michael-flynn/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*“You are asking my client to lie,” Michael Flynn’s new defense attorney Sidney Powell charged in a contentious June meeting with federal prosecutors. Flynn would continue to cooperate with prosecutors, Powell stressed, but he could not provide the testimony the government sought at the July trial of Flynn Intel Group (FIG) co-founder Bijan Rafiekian, “because it is not true.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*Soon after, the government filed a motion in Rafiekian’s case, branding Flynn a co-conspirator and informing the court that Flynn would no longer testify against his former business partner.  &lt;br /&gt;
:*Margot Cleveland: Judge Orders Ethics Training For Michael Flynn’s Former Lawyers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/18/judge-orders-ethics-training-michael-flynns-former-lawyers/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''19 July.''' Margot Cleveland: Latest Development In Flynn Case Proves Special Counsel Was A Cover For Taking Down Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/19/latest-development-flynn-case-proves-special-counsel-cover-operation-taking-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*George Nader, key Mueller witness and informant in the Russia probe, indicted on child [[pornography]] charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2019/07/19/george-nader-mueller-probe-child-pornography-1422642?nname=playbook-pm&amp;amp;nid=0000015a-dd3e-d536-a37b-dd7fd8af0000&amp;amp;nrid=00000162-fcf3-d4aa-a366-fcfbd38e0000&amp;amp;nlid=964328&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''21 July.''' CTH: IMPORTANT – Video Confirms Butowsky Lawsuit Claim: Julian Assange Told Ellen Ratner DNC Emails Received From Seth Rich – Not a Russian Hack.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/21/important-video-confirms-butowsky-lawsuit-claim-julian-assange-told-ellen-ratner-dnc-emails-received-from-seth-rich-not-a-russian-hack/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Bizarre Status of Flynn Partner Trial – FARA Prosecution in Tenuous Disposition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/21/bizarre-status-of-flynn-partner-trial-fara-prosecution-in-tenuous-disposition/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hoft: Update: Obama Deep State Spy Stephan Halper Was Paid Over $1.05 Million — His Work Spying on Trump Officials Went Well Into 2017/&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/obama-deep-state-spy-stephan-halper-was-paid-over-1-05-million-his-work-spying-on-trump-officials-went-well-into-2017/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''22 July.''' Paul Sperry: Justice Dept. Watchdog Has Evidence Comey Probed Trump, on the Sly.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/07/22/comey_under_scrutiny_for_own_inquiry_and_misleading_trump_119584.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Politico:'' Trump met with Nunes to talk intel chief replacements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/story/2019/07/22/trump-nunes-intelligence-chiefs-1426698&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sundance: IG Report Delay, Declassification and Investigative Timeline.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/22/ig-report-delay-declassification-and-investigative-timeline/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*John Solomon Outlines More Documented DOJ Corruption by Special Counsel Prosecutor Andrew Weissmann.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/22/john-solomon-outlines-more-documented-doj-corruption-by-special-counsel-prosecutor-andrew-weissmann/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''WaPo:'' [[Shokin]] was fired because of efforts to investigate Burisma Holdings and Hunter Biden. &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the activities of Burisma, the involvement of his son, Hunter Biden, and the [prosecutor general’s office] investigators on his tail, are the only, I emphasize, the only motives for organizing my resignation.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://archive.is/TwSoL#selection-1307.0-1591.7 As vice president, Biden said Ukraine should increase gas production. Then his son got a job with a Ukrainian gas company], By Michael Kranish and David L. Stern, ''[[Washington Post]]'', July 22, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''23 July.''' John Solomon: How Mueller deputy Andrew Weissmann's offer to an oligarch could boomerang on DOJ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/454185-how-mueller-deputy-andrew-weissmanns-offer-to-an-oligarch-could-boomerang&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Andrew Weissmann]] offered to drop fabricated charges in their entirety if Ukrainian oligarch [[Dmytro Firtash]] would lie under oath saying Trump was being financed by Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Pelosi issues 6 page Mueller Blitz DNC/media talking points.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/419479286/Mueller-Strategy#from_embed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Statement by Sidney Powell, attorney for Michael Flynn, on the Bijan Rafiekian case.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1153757840655474688&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*RAY McGOVERN: A Non-Hack That Raised Hillary’s Hackles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/07/22/ray-mcgovern-a-non-hack-that-raised-hillarys-hackles/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*IWB: Mueller, Meddling and the Routing of the Russia-Gate Narrative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/jhk-mueller-meddling-and-the-routing-of-the-russia-gate-narrative/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller’s  conclusion was held up by two tent poles:&lt;br /&gt;
::*1)  A Russian oligarch purchased facebook ads, and,&lt;br /&gt;
::*2)  Russia hacked the DNC servers.&lt;br /&gt;
:*1) In early 2018, Mueller sold a DC grand jury on producing indictments against a Russian outfit called the Internet Research Agency and its parent company Concord Management, owned by Russian oligarch Yevgeny Prigozhin for the so-called election meddling. The indictment was celebrated as a huge coup at the time by the likes of CNN and The New York Times, styled as a silver bullet in the heart of the Trump presidency. But the indicted parties were all in Russia, and could not be extradited, and there was zero expectation that any actual trial would ever take place — leaving Mueller &amp;amp; Co. off-the-hook for proving their allegations.&lt;br /&gt;
:*To the great surprise of Mr. Mueller and his “team,” Mr. Prigozhin hired some American lawyers to defend his company in court. Smooth move. It automatically triggered the discovery process, by which the accused is entitled to see the evidence that prosecutors hold. It turned out that Mr. Mueller’s team had no evidence that the Russian government was involved with the Facebook pranks. This annoyed Judge Friedrich, who ordered Mr. Mueller and his lawyers to desist making public statements about Concord and IRA’s alleged “sweeping and systemic” collusion with Russia, and threatened legal sanctions if they did.&lt;br /&gt;
:*2) But the other tentpole of the two-year-plus inquisition has also collapsed: the allegation that Russian intel hacked the DNC servers. It’s now a matter of public record that the DNC servers were never examined by federal officials. They were purportedly scrutinized by a DNC contractor called CrowdStrike, co-founded by Russian Dimitri Alperovitch, an adversary of Vladimir Putin, active in US-based anti-Putin lobbying and PR. CrowdStrike’s “draft” report on their review of the server was laughably incomplete, and the Mueller team’s lawyers took no steps to validate it.&lt;br /&gt;
:*It would be interesting to hear Robert Mueller’s explanation for how come US computer forensic experts were never dispatched to take possession of the DNC servers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''24 July.''' '''Mueller bombs in House testimony.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:*Former FBI deputy assistant director Terry Turchie says the hearing confirmed a hostile intelligence operation was mounted against Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.yahoo.com/mueller-hearing-harmful-us-security-004807018.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeffrey Epstein put on suicide watch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''25 July.''' '''Trump-Zelenskyy phone call.'''The regime installed by the [[Victoria Nuland]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CL_GShyGv3o&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the Obama administration in 2014 was defeated in [[parliamentary]] elections four days earlier. President Trump was calling President Zelenskyy to congratulate him on the victory and map out cooperation fighting corruption and international criminal conspiracies on both sides of the Atlantic. &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|'''The President:''' I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say [[Crowdstrike]]… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named [[Robert Mueller]], an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''President Zelenskyy:''' Yes it is very important for me and everything that you just mentioned earlier. For me as a President, it is very important and we are open for any future cooperation. We are ready to open a new page on cooperation in relations between the United States and Ukraine. For that purpose, I just recalled our ambassador from United States and he will be replaced by a very competent and very experienced ambassador who will work hard on making sure that our two nations are getting closer. I would also like and hope to see him having your trust and your confidence and have personal relations with you so we can cooperate even more so. I will personally tell you that one of my assistants spoke with Mr. Giuliani just recently and we are hoping very much that [[Rudy Giuliani|Mr. Giuliani]] will be able to travel to Ukraine and we will meet once he comes to Ukraine. I just wanted to assure you once again that you have nobody but friends around us. I will make sure that I surround myself with the best and most experienced people. I also wanted to tell you that we are friends. We are great friends and you Mr. President have friends in our country so we can continue our strategic partnership. I also plan to surround myself with great people and in addition to that investigation, I guarantee as the President of Ukraine that all the investigations will be done openly and candidly. That I can assure you.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''The President:''' Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that’s really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what's happening and he is a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that [[Biden]] stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that she stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''President Zelenskyy:''' I wanted to tell you about the prosecutor. First of all I understand and I'm knowledgeable about the situation. Since we have won the absolute majority in our Parliament, the next prosecutor general will be 100% my person, my candidate, who will be approved by the parliament and will start as a new prosecutor in September. He or she will look into the situation, specifically to the company that you mentioned in this issue. The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case. On top of that, I would kindly ask you if you have any additional information that you can provide to us, it would be very helpful for the investigation to make sure that we administer justice in our country with regard to the Ambassador to the United States from Ukraine as far I as I recall her name was Ivanovich. It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%. Her attitude towards me was far from the best as she admired the previous President and she was on his side. She would not accept me as a new President well enough. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''The President:''' Well, she's going to go through some things. I will have Mr. Giuliani to give you a call and I am also going to have [[William Barr|Attorney General Barr]] call and we will get to the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out. I heard the prosecutor was treated very badly and he was a very fair prosecutor so good luck with everything.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*According to [[Michael Barry]]'s  [[whistleblower]] complaint dated August 12, 2019, President Trump requested President Zelensky to &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the [[2016 U.S. presidential election]] originated in Ukraine , with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the [[Democratic National Committee]] (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm Crowdstrike.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Barr reinstates [[death penalty]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/federal-government-resume-capital-punishment-after-nearly-two-decade-lapse&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; peripheral figures in the [[Deep State coup plot]] begin coming forward to Horowitz and Durham.'''&lt;br /&gt;
*Joe di Genova: &amp;quot;John Brennan was the tip of the spear.  This was his conspiracy from day one.  John Brennan, don’t forget that name.  He’s at the end of this entire, he’s at the beginning of the entire conspiracy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Z7e5I0oHUc&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Attorney for [[Maria Butina]] writes Durham and Horowitz regarding Patrick Byrne,  CEO of Overstock.com.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/United-States-v.-Maria-Butina.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Byrne had an intimate relationship with the Russian gun right’s activist and libertarian, Maria Butina. Byrne has a low level security clearance related to work at Worldstock.com&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.overstock.com/worldstock-handmade&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the [[Council on Foreign Relations]].&lt;br /&gt;
::*Byrne first met Butina at Freedom Fest 2015. Byrne reported the encounter with the FBI in July 2015 after his first meeting with Butina. FBI encouraged Byrne to maintain contact with Butina and an explicit “green light” to meet with her. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Byrne informed the FBI that Maria’s behavior and interaction with him was inconsistent with her being a foreign agent and more likely an idealist and age-appropriate peace activist.&lt;br /&gt;
::*At some point prior to the 2016 election, when Byrne’s contact with Maria diminished or ceased, the government asked and encouraged him to renew contact with her and he did so, continuing to inform the government of her activities. Byrne states he was informed by government agents that his pursuit and involvement with Maria (and concomitant surveillance of her) was requested and directed from the highest levels of the FBI and [[intelligence community]].”&lt;br /&gt;
::*As Byrne became more and more convinced that Maria was what she said she was—an inquisitive student in favor of better U.S.-Russian relations—and not an agent of the Russian government or someone involved in espionage or illegal activities. He states he conveyed these thoughts and the corroborating facts and observations about Maria to the government.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*Byrne met twice with DOJ attorneys in April, 2019 giving a total of seven hours of interviews on the separate occasions.&lt;br /&gt;
::*FBI denied it had any Brady material -exculpatory information – that the bureau may have collected from Byrne on Butina during the trial. FBI denied it had any information regarding Byrne and Butina’s relationship.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Byrne’s decision to come forward happened after watching what transpired between the FBI, the intelligence community and the probe into President Trump’s campaign over the past several years. “It was something I knew I had to do,” he told this reporter. “Those running the operation were not honest and in the end I realized I was being used in some sort of soft coup.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*in 2005. Byrne launched a massive campaign against hedge fund market manipulation and the possibility they were going to crash Wall Street (see [[Naked Short Selling]]). Some financial giants, along with members of the media (see [[Wikipedia#Wordbomb Saga]]), were chomping at the bit to destroy him, he recalled. It wasn’t until the market crashed in 2008 and he won his battle in court that those enemies backed off. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Joe di Genova: The Durham investigation has caused &amp;quot;people to flock back to Horowitz to correct their testimony,&amp;quot; extending Inspector General Horowitz's FISA abuse investigation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MHCZ89I77M&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*di Genova and Toensing: [[Mifsud]] has been interviewed by Horowitz and Durham.&lt;br /&gt;
*Chuck Ross: Prosecutors Reveal New Child Sex Allegations Against Key Mueller Witness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/24/george-nader-child-sex-grooming-pimping/?utm_medium=email&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Comey Memo Update: DOJ Requests More Time to Respond – More Effort to Block Release.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/25/comey-memo-update-doj-requests-more-time-to-respond-more-effort-to-block-release/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''26 July.''' '''''[[New York Times]]'' Samuel Moyn, Yale law professor Op-ed: The Mueller Fantasy Comes Crashing Down.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/26/opinion/mueller-testimony.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*“In the hours and days after Mr. Mueller gave his opening statement before the House Judiciary Committee it became clear how tenaciously many liberals and progressives are clinging to fantasy.”&lt;br /&gt;
*Margot Cleveland: Mueller’s Ignorance Of Fusion GPS Proves His Investigation Was A Sham.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCWYkHOpxp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/26/muellers-ignorance-fusion-gps-proves-investigation-sham/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hemingway And Harsanyi: Does Robert Mueller Know What’s In His Own Report?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/25/hemingway-and-harsanyi-does-robert-mueller-know-whats-in-his-own-report/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Senate Intel Panel Releases First Chapter of Report Into Russian Interference – Says No Votes Were Changed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/senate-intel-panel-releases-first-chapter-of-report-into-russian-interference-says-no-votes-were-changed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*DOJ’s Russia probe review focusing on 'smoking gun' tapes of meeting with Trump aide: sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dojs-russia-probe-review-focusing-on-tapes-of-talks-with-trump-aide-sources&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sara Carter: Russia Probe Twist: A Billion Dollar CEO, A Convicted Russian Agent And The FBI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/russia-probe-twist-a-billion-dollar-ceo-a-convicted-russian-agent-and-the-fbi/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Now they tell us: Story says Mueller was hands off, short on stamina.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/media/now-they-tell-us-story-says-mueller-was-hands-off-short-on-stamina&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Mike Adams: The Robert Mueller IMPLOSION: It’s time for Barr and Trump to prosecute the deep state traitors, or the American people will never regain any faith in the justice system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newstarget.com/2019-07-25-robert-mueller-implosion-its-time-for-barr-and-trump-to-prosecute-the-deep-state-traitors.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''27 July.''' Trump Reveals He Gave Attorney General Bill Barr Authority to Release Declassified Spygate Documents to Devin Nunes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/trump-reveals-he-gave-attorney-general-bill-barr-authority-to-release-declassified-spygate-documents-to-devin-nunes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*THE UPDATED LIST: 130 Times the FBI, DOJ and/or Mueller Gang “Deviated from Standard Practice” or Committed Crimes in Efforts to Exonerate Hillary and Indict President Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/the-updated-list-130-times-the-fbi-doj-and-or-mueller-gang-deviated-from-standard-practice-or-committed-crimes-in-efforts-to-exonerate-hillary-and-indict-president-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Papadopoulos tweets: &amp;quot;Senior democrats are in Italy today after Obama, Putin visited and Salvini was in DC. Lots of activity for little Italy. You know why Italy has all of a sudden become so popular among the great powers? Mifsud was working on behalf of Italian spy agencies and then farmed out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/GeorgePapa19/status/1155295281107202049&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''28 July.'''  Ratcliffe nominated to replace of Coats as DNI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQqkhWG1JO0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Ratcliffe]]: Sad But True… Mueller Report was Written by Hillary Clinton’s De Facto Legal Team.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/rep-john-ratcliffe-sad-but-true-mueller-report-was-written-by-hillary-clintons-de-facto-legal-team-video/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Bartiromo to Devin Nunes: “Who is the mastermind behind all of this?”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/28/maria-bartiromo-to-devin-nunes-who-is-the-mastermind-behind-all-of-this/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Brennan Visited Europe in November 2016 After US Presidential Election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/big-exclusive-obamas-cia-director-brennan-visited-europe-in-november-2016-after-us-presidential-election-why-was-that/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Papadopoulos Reveals Suspicious Businessman Who Gave Him $10,000 Is Deep State CIA Asset.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/breaking-papadopoulos-reveals-suspicious-businessman-who-gave-him-10000-is-deep-state-cia-asset-who-worked-with-cia-for-years-video/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Barr's Russiagate Origin Probe Pivots To 'Smoking Gun' Tapes With Exculpatory Evidence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-26/ag-barrs-russiagate-origin-probe-pivots-smoking-gun-tapes-exculpatory-evidence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Update: Attkisson v. DOJ and FBI for government computer intrusions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/07/update-attkisson-v-doj-and-fbi-for-government-computer-intrusions/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''29 July.''' '''Comey is Under Investigation – John Huber Investigating Comey Memos''' – Memos Possibly to be Released This Week.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/29/boom-james-comey-is-under-investigation-john-huber-investigating-comey-memos-memos-possibly-to-be-released-this-week/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Joe diGenova: “Declassified documents will be released this week … by Wednesday” (July 31st).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKuoV03R7Jk&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oe3B9kHa8wU&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Thomas Paine: FBI Braces for Durham’s First Intel Drop; ‘No One Is Safe’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://truepundit.com/fbi-braces-for-durhams-first-intel-drop-no-one-is-safe/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*7 Times Robert Mueller Played Dumb Before Congress For Partisan Advantage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/29/7-times-robert-mueller-played-dumb-congress-partisan-advantage/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Soft Coup and Impeachment Crew React to Removal of Dan Coats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/29/soft-coup-and-impeachment-crew-react-to-removal-of-dan-coats/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Brennan Spooked After Deep State DNI Chief Dan Coats Resigns – Attacks Ratcliffe as “Servile Trump Loyalist”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/brennan-spooked-after-deep-state-dni-chief-dan-coats-resigns-attacks-ratcliffe-as-servile-trump-loyalist/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*WAYNE ALLYN ROOT: The Weissmann Witch Hunt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/wayne-allyn-root-the-weissmann-witch-hunt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia collusion hoax COLLAPSES following Robert Mueller’s disastrous “testimony”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newstarget.com/2019-07-27-russian-collusion-hoax-collapses-after-robert-mueller-testimony.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''30 July.''' Clinton appointed judge rules Russia was not in collusion with Wikileaks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/30/us/politics/dnc-trump-russia-lawsuit-dismissed.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*DNC emails published by Wikileaks were legally published.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L80-PheB_A0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Why the Mystery of Russiagate Hinges on the Mystery of Joseph Mifsud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/07/30/why_the_mystery_of_joseph_mifsud_is_the_mystery_of_russiagate_119761.html?utm_source=rcp-today&amp;amp;utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_campaign=mailchimp-newsletter Why the Mystery of Russiagate Hinges on the Mystery of Joseph Mifsud], By Eric Felten, RealClearInvestigations, July 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*John Solomon: Chris Wray's FBI continues to cover for Team Comey's Russia shenanigans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/455228-chris-wrays-fbi-continues-to-cover-for-team-comeys-russia-shenanigans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Ousting of DNI Dan Coats is Start of Major Trump Shake-Up to Rock Intelligence Community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/07/report-ousting-of-dni-dan-coats-is-start-of-major-trump-shake-up-to-rock-intelligence-community-more-changes-coming/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Economist:'' Jeffrey Epstein Will be Killed in Jail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://summit.news/2019/07/30/economist-jeffrey-epstein-will-be-killed-in-jail/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''31 July.''' Two FBI Agents Picked Up Comey Memos From His House Day Before Senate Testimony.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-docs-show-fbi-agents-went-to-comeys-home-to-retrieve-memos/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Likely Strzok and Pientka.&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Reconciling John Solomon’s Reporting on Comey.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/31/reconciling-john-solomons-reporting-on-comey/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Interview with Ed Butowsky.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nqcKnyipwE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Guardian: Secret McCabe Texts With MI-5 Counterpart Emerge, Spotlighting UK's Early Role In 'Russiagate'.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jul/30/secret-texts-cast-light-uk-early-role-trump-russia-inquiry&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-31/secret-mccabe-texts-mi-5-counterpart-begin-trickle-out-spotlighting-uks-early-role&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: The Crossover – China Views Lack of ‘Spygate’ Accountability as Evidence of Trump’s Weakness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/07/31/the-crossover-china-views-lack-of-spygate-accountability-as-evidence-of-trumps-weakness/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===August 2019===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''1 August.''' Report: DOJ IG Referred James Comey For Criminal Prosecution For Leaking Classified Information.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/08/01/doj-ig-referred-james-comey-criminal-prosecution-leaking-classified-information/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*RAY McGOVERN: DNI Nominee Intent on Getting to Bottom of Russiagate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.google.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''2 August.''' [[Uniparty]]-dominated [[SSCI]] kills Ratcliffe [[DNI]] nomination.  [[Deep State]] wants an insider, not an outside reformer, as intelligence community head.&lt;br /&gt;
:*SSCI was complicit in the coup attempt.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Coats resignation and Ratcliffe's nomination was due to the [[IC]]'s non-compliance with President Trump's declassification order of May 23, 2019 to Attorney General William Barr. The declassification order put the DNI beneath the Attorney General.  Coats has not complied with the order to produce documents from [[John Brennan]]'s [[CIA]] exposing CIA's role in 2016 election interference and the subsequent coup plot.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Rosenstein wants Coat's flunky, DNI deputy Sue Gordon to hold the line in stonewalling the Presidential declassification [[Executive Order]], preventing transparency and reform.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/rosenstein-tweet-sue-gordon.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*DOJ Files Motion to Block Court Order Forcing Release of “Archey Declarations” (Comey Memos).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/02/doj-files-motion-to-block-court-order-forcing-release-of-archey-declarations-comey-memos/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Nunes: I believe James Comey will be held accountable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHZmqeC1vT0&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*“My Testimony in Front of Senate Should be Interesting” – Papadopoulos Fires Warning Shot at Jim Comey and Conspiracy Peddlers at ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/my-testimony-in-front-of-senate-should-be-interesting-papadopoulos-fires-warning-shot-at-jim-comey-and-conspiracy-peddlers-at-washington-post/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Consortiumnews:'' WATCH: CN Live! Kim Dotcom, Bill Binney, Mike Gravel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/08/02/watch-cn-live-kim-dotcom-bill-binney-mike-gravel-on-episode-4/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''3 August.''' Rod Rosenstein Contacted Mueller About Special Counsel 14 Hours After Comey Fired.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/03/rod-rosenstein-contacted-mueller-about-special-counsel-14-hours-after-comey-fired/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''4 August.''' Maria Bartiromo interview with Trey Gowdy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/04/explosive-interview-maria-bartiromo-drops-big-news-with-trey-gowdy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*FITTON:GIANT Week: FBI Will Produce Bruce Ohr 302 reports on his contacts with Clinton-DNC-FBI spy Christopher Steele to Judicial Watch by Thursday.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/fittongiant-week-fbi-will-produce-bruce-ohr-302-reports-on-his-contacts-with-clinton-dnc-fbi-spy-christopher-steele-to-judicial-watch-by-thursday/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''5 August.''' DECLASSIFIED: Why the Mifsud Story Matters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUZ8XI_ncas&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Barr Has Far Bigger Things To Prosecute James Comey For Than Leaking Memos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.fo/tiv9o&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Russiagate Comes to Italy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/08/05/russiagate-comes-to-italy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''6 August.''' '''Judge Paves Road to Trial for Ex-Obama Counsel.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-paves-road-to-trial-for-ex-obama-counsel/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*federal judge refused Tuesday to block the trial of [[Greg Craig]], former White House counsel to President Barack Obama, on charges that he misled the government about his work on a secret [[Ukrainian]] government campaign linked to [[Paul Manafort]].&lt;br /&gt;
:*the ruling sustains the allegation that Craig willfully lied to the Justice Department to avoid registering as a foreign agent.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The government’s allegations, arising from the special counsel [[Robert Mueller]]’s investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, involve Craig’s private-sector work in 2012 with the law firm Skadden Arps.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Federal prosecutors accuse Craig of lying about his role in developing a report in collaboration with Manafort, President Donald Trump’s former campaign chairman, to calm public backlash against the Ukrainian government over the arrest of Orange Revolution leader [[Yulia Tymoshenko]] in 2012.  “In or about early 2012, in the face of the international criticism regarding Tymoshenko’s trial, Ukraine engaged the law firm and Craig, as lead partner, to conduct an independent inquiry into whether, under Western standards of justice, Tymoshenko had received a fair trial, and to prepare a report based on that inquiry.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*Judge Amy Berm,an Jackson also oversaw the prosecution of Manafort, lightly veiled in the indictment as the lobbyist Craig worked with on the Tymoshenko report.  “Ukraine planned to deploy the report as part of a strategy headed by an American lobbyist whom Ukraine had employed to, among other things, improve Ukraine’s international public image,” the indictment continues.:*Prior to joining the Trump campaign, Manafort acted as a lobbyist for former Ukrainian President [[Viktor Yanukovych]]. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Former Manafort associate Rick Gates is set to testify against Craig next week, with federal prosecutors indicating that he will be swiftly sentenced following his cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;
:*“Defendant cannot support a contention that he was ‘singled out for prosecution from among others similarly situated;’ at least three others have been charged with making false statements to the Department of Justice or the Special Counsel’s Office with respect to work done in connection with the Ukraine,” the judge’s order states.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000016c-686c-da83-a96c-fafd98ff0000 Judge Jackson's Ruling]&lt;br /&gt;
*Sara Carter: Peter Strzok Sues FBI For Reinstatement Claiming ‘Unrelenting Pressure’ From Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/fired-sac-peter-strzok-sues-fbi-for-reinstatement-claiming-unrelenting-pressure-from-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Judicial Watch obtains records of 14 referrals of FBI employees for leaking classified information.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-obtains-records-of-14-referrals-of-fbi-employees-for-leaking-sensitive-or-classified-information/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*PATRICK LAWRENCE: Finally Time for DNC Email Evidence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/08/05/patrick-lawrence-finally-time-for-dnc-email-evidence/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''7 August.''' '''Paul Sperry: Mueller Tied to Double Deception: First in Court, Then Before Congress.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/08/06/mueller_suspected_of_compound_deception_of_judge_congress_in_overstating_kremlin_role_119854.html Mueller Tied to Double Deception: First in Court, Then Before Congress Mueller Tied to Double Deception: First in Court, Then Before Congress], By Paul Sperry, RealClearInvestigations, August 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the case of ''[[U.S. vs. Concord Management]]'', &lt;br /&gt;
:Mueller may have perjured himself before Congress in his sworn testimony with an untruthful answer about why he held an earlier press briefing.&lt;br /&gt;
:*court documents suggest Mueller may have made his May 29 press conference as damage control after a federal judge threatened to hold the [[Mueller team]] in criminal contempt of court over what she called misleading language in the Mueller Report about Russian government interference in the 2016 election. Under oath before Congress, Mueller denied the judge’s action had anything to do with the May 29 press conference.&lt;br /&gt;
:*In the the May 29 press conference, Mueller stressed that the Russians he indicted were “private” entities and &amp;quot;presumed innocent.&amp;quot;  Mueller didn’t tell the country that the day before, Judge Dabney Friedrich: ordered Mueller to stop overstating evidence of Kremlin-directed interference.&lt;br /&gt;
:*On May 28, Judge Friedrich called attorneys prosecuting the case into her courtroom for a closed hearing. Friedrich agreed with one defendant’s claims that Mueller had overstated the evidence when he implied in the Mueller Report to Congress that the trolls were controlled by the Russian government and that the [[social media]] operations they conducted during the 2016 presidential campaign were directed by [[Moscow]]. News organizations had seized on the highly suggestive wording in his report to report they were part of a [[Kremlin]]-run operation.  Concerned that the Mueller Report could prejudice a jury and jeopardize the defendants' right to a fair trial, Friedrich ordered the special prosecutor to stop making such claims and “to minimize the prejudice moving forward” — or face sanction.&lt;br /&gt;
:*“The government shall refrain from making or authorizing any public statement that links the alleged conspiracy in the indictment to the Russian government.  Willful failure to do so in the future will result in the initiation of contempt proceedings.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*The judge explained that Mueller’s report improperly referred to the defendants’ “social media operations” as one of “two principal interference operations in the 2016 U.S. presidential elections” carried out by the Russian government. She also pointed out that he also referred to their Internet trolling as “active measures” — a term of art that typically includes operations conducted by Russian intelligence to influence international affairs. She said this was a departure from the government’s original February 2018 indictment, which “does not link the defendants to the Russian government&amp;quot; and “alleges only private conduct by private actors.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Friedrich further directed the prosecution to make clear that its allegations are simply that and “remain unproven.” She also admonished Mueller’s team from expressing &amp;quot;an opinion on the defendant’s guilt or innocence.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The next day, May 29, Mueller's statement at the Department of Justice press podium apparently mollified the judge. In a recently unsealed July 1 opinion, Friedrich wrote that Mueller had “demonstrated” the government had complied with her order with his statements to the media.  “In delivering his remarks the special counsel carefully distinguished between the efforts by 'Russian intelligence officers who were part of the Russian military' and the efforts detailed ‘in a separate indictment’ by ‘a ''private'' [italics in original] Russian entity engaged in a social media operation where Russian ''citizens'' [italics in original] posed as Americans in order to interfere in the election.’”&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller's hastily assembled press briefing room headed off a public rebuke by the judge hearing one of the signature indictments of Mueller’s 22-month investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
:*When Mueller testified before the House Judiciary Committee on July 24 Rep. [[Tom McClintock]] asked him about the may 29 press conference, pressing him on whether the real reason he called it was to “retroactively” soften allegations he made in his report to comply with Judge Friedrich's demands a day earlier.  In spite of documentary evidence suggesting otherwise, Mueller flatly stated that the court order had nothing to do with his calling the news conference, implying that the timing was just a coincidence.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.193580/gov.uscourts.dcd.193580.144.0_1.pdf ''U.S. vs. Concord Management'', TRANSCRIPT OF MOTIONS HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE DABNEY L. FRIEDRICH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE], May 28, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/concord-sanctions-order.pdf ''U.S. vs. Concord Management'', Memorandum, Opinion and Order], July 1, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Sara Carter: Top FBI Deputy Assistant Director Who Leaked To Media Revealed: DOJ Declined Prosecution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/top-fbi-deputy-assistant-director-who-leaked-to-media-revealed-former-doj-declined-prosecution/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fisa-2.jpg|right|350px|thumb|The FISA court ruled the [[Obama administration]]'s improper access of [[FISA]] data granted to contractors &amp;quot;seems to have been the result of deliberate decision making.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''9 August.''' '''Judicial Watch obtains 12 [[Bruce Ohr]] 302 interviews.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/421245115/Bruce-Ohr-302-Reports-Judicial-Watch-v-DOJ#download&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Andrew McCabe Files Federal Civil Lawsuit Against DOJ and FBI – Claims Trump Carried Out “Unconstitutional Plan” Against Him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/08/andrew-mccabe-files-federal-civil-lawsuit-against-doj-and-fbi-claims-trump-carried-out-unconstitutional-plan-against-him/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump Announces Departure of Deputy DNI Sue Gordon – Former Admiral Joseph Maguire Will Serve as Acting DNI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/08/president-trump-announces-departure-of-deputy-dni-sue-gordon-former-admiral-joseph-maguire-will-serve-as-acting-dni/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Maguire comes from his current position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). The NCTC was first organized by [[John Brennan]], and is suspected that this part of the intelligence apparatus ties directly into the 2015/2016 [[FISA abuse]]. This is laid out in the 99-page opinion from [[FISC]] Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer who also noted that none of this FISA abuse was accidental in a footnote on page 87: “deliberate decisionmaking“: This specific footnote, if declassified, would be key.  Note the phrase: ''“([redacted] access to FBI systems was the subject of an interagency memorandum of understanding entered into [redacted])”'', this sentence has the potential to expose an internal decision; withheld from congress and the FISA court by the [[Obama administration]]; that outlines a process for access and distribution of [[surveillance]] data. Note: ''“no notice of this practice was given to the FISC until 2016“'', that is important.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2019/04/fisa-abuse-improper-decisionmaking.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*This was a weaponized surveillance and domestic political spying operation. The trail was laid down in specific detail by Judge Collyer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/23/the-obama-use-of-fisa-702-as-a-domestic-political-surveillance-program/ The Obama Use of FISA-702 as a Domestic Political Surveillance Program],  April 23, 2019 by sundance.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Warner-and-waldman-1 (1).jpg|right|350px|thumb|SSCI vice-chair [[Mark Warner]] discussing [[Deep State coup]] with [[Deripaska]] and [[Christopher Steele|Steele]]'s attorney, [[Adam Waldman]]. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*Trump tells reporters &amp;quot;we’re dealing with the [ [[SSCI]] ] committee and Senator Burr.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/10/warning-troubling-statement-by-president-trump-were-dealing-with-senator-burr-were-dealing-with-the-committee/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*In the March 2017 text message you can see SSCI vice chair Sen. Mark Warner attempting to set up covert “no paper trail” communication with dossier author Christopher Steele.  Adam Waldman represented Chris Steele and Steele’s employer, Oleg Deripaska.  Less than a month later Steele is in direct contact with [[Dan Jones]].  “[Chris] said Dan Jones is coming to see you” etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Dan Jones raised $50 million from those who were behind the 2016 stop Trump effort, and the purpose was now the 2017 removal effort.  Jones having left Sen [[Dianne Feinstein]]'s staff on the SSCI (now outside govt.) then paid Christopher Steele and [[Fusion GPS]] to keep up their efforts.  Jones was now talking in person (“coming to see you”) to SSCI Vice-Chair Mark Warner in April 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The role of Fusion-GPS in 2017 shifted, and was now weighted toward feeding a specific media narrative that would aid impeachment through the FBI, [[Andrew Weissmann]] and Mueller obstruction theory.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The SSCI was heavily involved in the impeachment effort after the election.  Secondary documentation of the connection between the DOJ, FBI, Fusion, and Dan Jones shows up in the FBI investigative 302 notes of Bruce Ohr,  May 8th, 2017, interview – pg 18, 19 of pdf.   Bruce Ohr is talking about Dan Jones efforts as they were currently aligned with Fusion GPS: “and had been on the staff of the [Senate Intelligence Committee]”…. “At the time of the interview [Jones] was working with the [Vice Chairman of the Committee Mark Warner]”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/bruce-ohr-302-dan-jones.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Twitchy:‘It’s like they’re trying to get out in FRONT of something’: Timing around McCabe and Strzok’s lawsuits against govt. very telling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2019/08/09/its-like-theyre-trying-to-get-out-in-front-of-something-timing-around-mccabe-and-strzoks-lawsuits-against-govt-very-telling/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Posturing to claim Durham indictments are political payback.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Margot Cleveland: Here’s Your Guide To Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok’s Lawsuit Demanding His Job Back.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/08/09/heres-guide-former-fbi-agent-peter-strzoks-lawsuit-demanding-job-back/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*DECLASSIFIED: Did Brennan Perjure Himself in Denying Use of Steele Dossier?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPMfR_bAX3k&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/did-john-brennan-perjure-himself-in-denying-use-of-steele-dossier_3034718.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Brennan’s Role In Russia Collusion Hoax Becomes Clearer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/slee/2019/08/09/icymi-brennan-perjury-allegations-bubbling/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''10 August.''' Jeffrey Epstein dead in his jail cell a day after unsealed pedophiliac allegations against Bill Clinton, [[Bill Richardson]], and other global elite socialists and Democrats made public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;*[https://www.cernovich.com/epsteindocuments/?mc_cid=b4e4c2fd1f&amp;amp;mc_eid=a358b7107b Unsealed Epstein Files]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Spygate Indictments Coming, Says Former Intelligence Operative Tony Shaffer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVHeNImj9f8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''11 August.''' Sara Carter: Two Tiered System Of Justice: Top FBI Officials Escape Prosecution, While Others Pay Heavy Price.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/two-tiered-system-of-justice-top-fbi-officials-escape-prosecution-while-others-pay-heavy-price/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''12 August.''' Court orders unredacted Comey Diaries to be made public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/12/federal-judge-completely-rejects-doj-argument-orders-archey-declarations-descriptions-of-comey-memosreleased/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The Comey Diaries are a roadmap of the FBI's counterintelligence investigation of Donald Trump, including names of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greg Craig]] trial begins.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/12/mueller-investigation-obama-manafort/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Bruce Ohr relayed at least four dubious claims to the FBI that he received from Christopher Steele and Glenn Simpson.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/12/bruce-ohr-dubious-glenn-simpson-christopher-steele/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sara Carter: Overstock CEO Turned Over Docs To DOJ ‘on FBI’s Russian and Hillary Clinton Probes’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/overstock-ceo-turned-over-docs-to-doj-on-fbis-russian-and-hillary-clinton-probes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Patrick Byrne: 2016 FBI Activity Was “Political Espionage”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/12/quirky-angle-overstock-ceo-patrick-byrne-2016-fbi-activity-was-political-espionage/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Consortiumnews:'' Russiagate is Dead, but for the Political Establishment, it is Still the New 42.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/08/11/russiagate-is-dead-but-for-the-political-establishment-it-is-still-the-new-42/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeffrey Epstein Attorney: He Was Concerned For His Life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/epstein-attorney-he-was-concerned-for-his-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''13 August.''' RAY McGOVERN: Seth Rich’s Ghost Haunts the Courts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/08/12/ray-mcgovern-richs-ghost-haunts-the-courts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*RealClearInvestigations: Victoria Nuland Tells All on Steele Dossier ... Not.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/08/12/victoria_nuland_tells_all_on_trump-russia__not_119932.html Victoria Nuland Tells All on Steele Dossier ... Not].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sara Carter: Exclusive: Google Insider Turns Over 950 Pages Of Docs And Laptop To DOJ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/exclusive-google-insider-turns-over-950-pages-of-docs-and-laptop-to-doj/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''14 August.''' [[Adam Lovinger]] cleared.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rowan Scarborough, [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/14/investigation-clears-analyst-accused-of-leaking-da/ EXCLUSIVE: Probe clears pro-Trump Pentagon analyst, report withheld from defense team], THE WASHINGTON TIMES (Aug. 14, 2019).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Comey Memo FOIA Update: CNN Files Motion Demanding Immediate Production – DOJ Says 60 Days.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/14/comey-memo-foia-update-cnn-files-motion-demanding-immediate-production-doj-says-60-days/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Katie Pavlich: Judicial Watch Finds Documents Showing Fusion GPS Working Directly With Obama's DOJ to Frame Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2019/08/14/judicial-watch-finds-documents-showing-fusion-gps-working-directly-with-doj-to-frame-trump-with-ties-to-russia-n2551685&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Grassley, Johnson Release Investigative Findings on Alleged Hack of Clinton’s Server by China'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-johnson-release-investigative-findings-alleged-hack-clinton-s-server&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Finance Committee and Homeland Security  Majority Staff letter to Sens. Grassley and Johnson.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2019-08-14%20Staff%20memo%20to%20CEG%20RHJ%20-%20ICIG%20Interview%20Summary%20RE%20Clinton%20Server.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Staff from the Intelligence Community Inspector General’s office (ICIG) witnessed efforts by senior Obama State Department officials to downplay the volume of classified emails that transited former Secretary Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized server. The revelations corroborate concerns raised early in the email classification review that State Department officials sought to use lower-level [[FOIA]] exemptions to prevent the release of emails that other experts deemed to be classified.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The classified interview was conducted jointly by staff for then-Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman [[Chuck Grassley]] (R-Iowa) and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman [[Ron Johnson]] (R-Wis.) in December 2018. Staff for the committees’ ranking Democrats, Sens. [[Dianne Feinstein]] (D-Calif.) and [[Claire McCaskill]] (D-Mo.), also participated in the interview, which stemmed from news reports in August 2018 that China may have been able to hack the server. To investigate the allegations, committee staff interviewed Frank Rucker and Jeanette McMillian of the ICIG. Rucker was tasked in 2015 with protecting classified intelligence community equities during the State Department’s FOIA review of the server’s contents. He alerted the FBI to suspicious activity on the server that may have been evidence of an intrusion.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Paul Combetta]], who administered the server and used software designed to prevent forensic recovery while deleting Clinton’s emails, refused to cooperate with the Justice Department Inspector General (DOJ IG) and Congress.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/16/hillary-clinton-emails-cryptic-gmail/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Documents Show Hillary’s Server Was Compromised, Emails Forwarded To Chinese Email Account.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/08/15/newly-declassified-documents-show-hillarys-server-compromised-emails-forwarded-chinese-email-account/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Senate Judiciary Committee released documents that contain information that verifies Clinton had all her emails copied and forwarded to a Chinese companies' email account in real time.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Paul Combetta created &amp;quot;carterheavyindustries@gmail.com&amp;quot; on August 20, 2012.  He used it to transfer all of Clinton's emails to the PRN server in early 2014.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/IvanPentchoukov/status/1161998351149281280&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*every email sent and received on Clinton’s home brew server was copied to an email address registered to the Chinese company named Carter Heavy Industries.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Clinton deliberately put emails on an unsecured server were all being sent to CarterHeavyIndustries [CHI] email account, and then forwarded from there to a [Platte River Networks] PRN server.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Jeannette McMillian, an attorney for the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), told Congress that this email with the name of a Chinese company appeared to serve as a &amp;quot;live dropbox&amp;quot; for all of Clinton's emails. McMillian told Congress that the Carter Heavy Industries email address in the Clinton-email metadata was set up to receive a copy of every email sent and received as they were sent, even if the intended addressee was different.&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Strzok ignored Chinese anomaly on Clinton server.'''  Frank Rucker, the ICIG investigator, and Jeanette McMillian, an ICIG attorney, told the FBI about the anomaly on Hillary Clinton's email server on February 18, 2016, at a meeting which included [[Peter Strzok]], who had just taken over as the section chief heading the investigation. Rucker told Congress that Strzok was “aloof and dismissive” and didn’t ask many questions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/hillary-clintons-emails-were-sent-to-gmail-address-with-a-chinese-companys-name_3043380.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Son of the Clintons’ pastor, Paul Wogaman, worked for the ICIG at the time and is suspected of leaking. Wogeman is now employed in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/15/clinton-mole-emails-preacher-odni-inspector-general/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Intelligence Community Inspector General investigators harassed and threatened.''' Strange Jeep Followed ICIG Investigators Probing Hillary Email Scandal – Investigator’s House Broken Into, Computers Stolen, Trash Rummaged Through. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/strange-jeep-followed-icig-investigators-probing-hillary-email-scandal-investigators-house-broken-into-computers-stolen-trash-rummaged-through/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Obama’s White House ran the [[Weiner laptop]] investigation'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/exclusive-newly-uncovered-evidence-confirms-obamas-white-house-ran-the-weiner-email-investigation-what-was-in-these-emails/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Photo Collage-20180428 235136.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Nellie Ohr (left) and Christopher Steele (right) collaborated on the ''Clinton-Steele dossier''. Nellie Ohr is the wife of Obama Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr. Steele is a foreign citizen hired by Hillary Clinton to influence the outcome of the 2016 election and affect the removal of a sitting president.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*JUDICIAL WATCH: NEW DOJ DOCS SHOW NELLIE OHR SENT DOJ/FBI ANTI-TRUMP RUSSIA DOSSIER MATERIALS THROUGH HER HUSBAND BRUCE OHR.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-doj-docs-show-nellie-ohr-sent-doj-anti-trump-russia-dossier-materials-through-her-husband-bruce-ohr/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Project Veritas'' releases video on Google whistleblower Zach Vorheis and Google's harassment and intimidation of Vorheis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1VeElBAeas&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''15 August.''' Jeff Carlson: FBI Documents Detailing Bruce Ohr Conversations Shed New Light on Spygate Scandal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/08/15/fbi-documents-detailing-bruce-ohr-conversations-shed-new-light-on-spygate-scandal/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Hoft: ''SMOKING GUN!….. SHOCKING FOIA DOCUMENT Shows FBI Agreed to Cover Up and Ignore All Hillary Crimes in Its 2016 Investigation''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/smoking-gun-shocking-foia-document-shows-fbi-agreed-to-cover-up-and-ignore-all-hillary-crimes-in-its-2016-investigation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*on June 20, 2016 the FBI signed off on a deal with Hillary Clinton’s attorney’s that gave Hillary’s team the right to destroy computers and emails. It also gave immunity to all of the people on Hillary’s team that participated in obstruction of justice. &lt;br /&gt;
:*On that same day, Jim Comey signed off on a separate memo that decided not to prosecute Hillary Clinton. The fix was in more than a month before Jim Comey appeared on camera to try to explain why he was not recommending prosecution of Hillary for putting Top Secret information on her unclassified server.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''16 August.''' DECLASSIFIED: Who Read Clinton's Emails?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLIYxwxZA4A&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*OAN: FBI ignored warnings about Clinton server.:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zYoB595gXg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Larry C. Johnson: The Unraveling of the Failed Coup to Take Out Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/larry-c-johnson-the-unraveling-of-the-failed-coup-to-take-out-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Judicial Watch: Nellie Ohr Claimed She Wasn’t Involved w/ Trump Targeting—New #SpyGate Docs Show SHE DID.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbVaW588igY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''17 August.''' Chuck Ross: FEC Chief Supported Russia-NRA Campaign Finance Probe Based Solely On ‘Vague’ News Article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/17/fec-democratic-chair-nra-russia-vague-story/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[FEC]] Chairwoman Ellen Weintraub, a Democrat, acknowledged she supported investigating possible Russian funding for the [[National Rifle Association]] based solely on an anonymously-sourced ''[[McClatchy]]'' news article published in January 18, 2018 (see [[Maria Butina]] [[FARA]] case).&lt;br /&gt;
:*The Mueller Report found not Russian collusion with the Trump campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
:*FusionGPS funneled false information to ''McClatchy'' and the FBI.&lt;br /&gt;
:*After Trump’s election victory, Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele began working with a non-profit group called The [[Democracy Integrity Project]] (TDIP).&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Daniel Jones]], the TDIP founder, told the FBI during a March 2017 interview that he had received $50 million in funding from a small group of New York and California billionaires to continue an investigation into Russian meddling and Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Jones said that one task for his group was to provide information to lawmakers, law enforcement agencies, and the media.&lt;br /&gt;
:*TDIP paid Fusion GPS more than $3.3 million in 2017. The group paid Steele another $250,000.&lt;br /&gt;
*New York Times board member apologizes for Jeffrey Epstein ties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2019/08/17/new-york-times-board-member-apologizes-for-jeffrey-epstein-ties/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''18 August.''' '''Assisted Suicide Avoidance – John Brennan Intel Asset Joseph Mifsud “Gave Audio Tape Deposition Before Going Into Hiding”'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/18/assisted-suicide-avoidance-john-brennan-intel-asset-joseph-mifsud-gave-audio-tape-deposition-before-going-into-hiding/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*John Solomon: According to Mifsud attorney [[Stephan Roh]], Joseph Mifsud admitted to being a western intelligence asset who was part of a CIA intelligence “operation” against candidate Donald Trump in March 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
:*an audio-taped deposition exists from Joseph Mifsud prior to going into hiding after the 2016 Presidential election.  From the description it sounds like Mifsud anticipated his assisted suicide and recorded a deposition as leverage against his unwanted demise. &lt;br /&gt;
:*What Solomon describes aligns with the CIA purposefully leaking the details about Mifsud to the ''Washington Post'' on July 1st, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
:*against a backdrop of looming revelations about the intelligence community and their activity in the 2016 election; suddenly ''The Washington Post'', out of nowhere, pushed an article intended to diffuse the issues around western intelligence asset Joseph Mifsud.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|''WaPo:''&amp;quot;The Maltese-born academic has not surfaced publicly since that October 2017 interview, days after Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about details of the irinteractions. Among them, Papadopoulos told investigators, was an April 2016 meeting in which Mifsud alerted him that the Russians had “dirt” on Hillary Clinton in the form of “thousands of emails.”&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The conversation between Mifsud and Papadopoulos, eventually relayed by an Australian diplomat to U.S. government officials, was cited by special counsel [[Robert S. Mueller III]] as the event that set in motion the FBI probe into ties between the Trump campaign and Russia.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;With Attorney General [[William P. Barr]]’s review of the counterintelligence investigation underway, the origins of the inquiry itself are now in the spotlight — and with them, the role of Mifsud.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Lindsey Graham says Horowitz FISA report will be 'ugly and damning' for DOJ.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lindsey-graham-says-horowitz-fisa-report-will-be-ugly-and-damning-for-doj &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''19 August.''' CTH: Assisted Suicide Avoidance – John Brennan Intel Asset Joseph Mifsud “Gave Audio Tape Deposition Before Going Into Hiding”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/18/assisted-suicide-avoidance-john-brennan-intel-asset-joseph-mifsud-gave-audio-tape-deposition-before-going-into-hiding/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''20 August.''' JUDICIAL WATCH: FEDERAL COURT ORDERS HEARING ON DOCUMENTS TYING BRUCE OHR TO FUSION GPS.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-federal-court-orders-hearing-on-documents-tying-bruce-ohr-to-fusion-gps/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Public interest in the Mueller report is already fading as the media shifts narratives to help defeat President Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Beavers, Olivia (August 20, 2019). [https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/458018-mueller-report-fades-from-political-conversation Mueller report fades from political conversation]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved August 20, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''21 August.''' ''Epoch Times:'' Focus in Spygate Scandal Shifts to CIA, Former Director Brennan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/focus-in-spygate-scandal-shifts-to-cia-former-director-brennan_3049534.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QnOxwth3yE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Epoch Times:'' Mifsud’s Lawyer: Former Italian Minister Nudged Mifsud to Introduce Trump’s Aide to Russians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/mifsuds-lawyer-former-italian-minister-nudged-mifsud-to-introduce-trumps-aide-to-russians_3051189.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''America First with Sebastian Gorka:'' Obamagate: The biggest scandal in our history. 3 hours on the plot to subvert Donald Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ULh5KXB_XI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christopher Wray]] Fights to Delay Release of Strzok-Page Text Messages Until AFTER 2020 Election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/fbi-director-wray-fighting-to-delay-release-of-strzok-page-text-messages-until-after-2020-election/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*A federal court ordered a hearing for Thursday, August 22, 2019, on the Clinton email issue. On December 6, 2018, U.S. District Court Judge Lamberth ordered Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers and Clinton aides to be deposed or answer written questions under oath. The court ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.”  &lt;br /&gt;
:*The court ordered discovery into three specific areas: whether Secretary Clinton’s email use of a private email server was intended to stymie FOIA; whether the State Department’s intent to settle this case in late 2014 and early 2015 amounted to bad faith; and whether the State Department has adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s request. Judicial Watch deposed nearly a dozen witnesses and will seek addition witnesses and documents from the court, including the deposition of [[Hillary Clinton]] and [[Cheryl Mills]], her chief of staff at State and personal lawyer who directed the destruction of 33,000 State Department Clinton emails. Lawyers for Clinton and Mills are expected at the hearing Thursday.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/federal-court-hearing-on-clinton-emails-judicial-watch-asking-for-deposition-of-hillary-clinton/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Heather Samuelson]], Clinton’s White House liaison at the State Department, and later Clinton’s personal lawyer, admitted under oath that she was granted immunity by the Department of Justice in June 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
:*In the interrogatory responses of [[Bill Priestap|E.W. (Bill) Priestap]], assistant director of the FBI Counterintelligence Division, he stated that the agency found Clinton email records in the Obama White House, specifically, the Executive Office of the President.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Jake Sullivan|Jacob “Jake” Sullivan]], Clinton’s senior advisor and deputy chief of staff when she was secretary of state, testified that both he and Clinton used her unsecure non-government email system to conduct official State Department business.&lt;br /&gt;
*Laura Loomer Wins Appeal, Will Face Google, Twitter, Facebook, and Apple In DC Circuit Court Of Appeals Over Censorship.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://lauraloomer.us/2019/08/21/laura-loomer-wins-appeal-will-face-google-twitter-facebook-and-apple-in-dc-circuit-court-of-appeals-over-censorship/#.XWGEEXdFxy3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Schiff in Ukraine.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Adam Schiff travels to Ukraine the week of August 23 to August 31. While in Ukraine on the taxpayer dime digging up dirt from foreigners on his enemies to influence the 2020 election, Schiff tweets on August 28 about Trump and Giuliani, kicking off [[Deep State coup 2.0]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''22 August.''' Comey FBI Willfully Ignored “Highly Classified” Hillary Clinton Emails.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/458478-the-road-not-taken-another-fbi-failure-involving-the-clintons&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Overstock CEO Resigns Amid Fallout Over ‘Deep State’ Comments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/22/overstock-ceo-resigns-deep-state-butina/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sidney Powell letter to Adam Schiff in response to June9, 2019 HPSCI subpoena.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/425143288/Powell-Response-to-Schiff-Demands#download&amp;amp;from_embed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''23 August.''' Adam Schiff travels to Ukraine 8/23 - 8/31.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Details Behind Patrick Byrne Allegations of FBI “Political Espionage”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/23/details-behind-patrick-byrne-allegations-of-fbi-political-espionage/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Patrick Byrne: Brace for Re-entry.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.deepcapture.com/2019/08/brace-for-re-entry/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''26 August.''' '''[[CNN]] hires [[Deep State coup]] plotter[[Andrew McCabe]] as a [[fake news]] analyst; McCabe was fired in 2018 for lying three times under oath to investigators and referred for criminal prosecution.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''CTH: Bill Barr’s Test – U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu Punts McCabe Indictment Decision Back to Main Justice.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/26/bill-barrs-test-u-s-attorney-jessie-liu-punts-mccabe-indictment-decision-back-to-main-justice/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/jn3XkM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*DC U.S. Attorney [[Jessie Liu]] has punted the decision on whether to indict former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe back to Main Justice, via Deputy AG Jeffrey Rosen.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Liu’s DC office was responsible for not prosecuting the [[Awan Brothers]]; &lt;br /&gt;
::*Liu’s office was responsible for covering up the [[James Wolfe indictment|leaking of the classified FISA application by SSCI Director of Security James Wolfe]].&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Request for Stay – DOJ Stalls For More Time Before Forced Production of Comey Memos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/26/request-for-stay-doj-stalls-for-more-time-before-forced-production-of-comey-memos/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''27 August.''' '''Joe DiGenova: &amp;quot;IG Horowitz has Concluded ALL FOUR FISA Warrants to Spy on Trump Campaign and Administration Were Illegal&amp;quot;.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1166469923587022848&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*'''[[Benjamin Wittes]]: ”You should thus expect charges against McCabe to be forthcoming any day. And if such charges don’t happen, that doesn’t mean they weren’t planned but, rather, that some extrinsic event has intervened”'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/kMt3C#selection-1249.0-1249.361&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: DOJ Stall Succeeds – Comey Memo/Archey Declaration Update – Expect Nothing Until After October 11th.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/27/doj-stall-succeeds-comey-memo-archey-declaration-update-expect-nothing-until-after-october-11th/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''28 August.''' White in Ukraine, [[Adam Schiff]] tweets about Trump, Giuliani and holding back funding pending assistance with political opponents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/RepAdamSchiff/status/1166867471862829056&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Byron York: Justice Department inspector general has done separate report on James Comey.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/columnists/justice-inspector-general-has-done-separate-report-on-james-comey&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Joe diGenova Discusses Upcoming IG Report on James Comey.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQbjJ1H6hcY&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''29 August.''' '''Report of Investigation of Former Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey's Disclosure of Sensitive Investigative Information and Handling of Certain Memoranda.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2019/o1902.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:112 2016 b4-napo-comey-hoove8201 c0-389-1420-1216 s885x516 (1).jpg|right|300px|thumb|Under James Comey the FBI returned to the use of sexual innuendo and domestic spying on political opponents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/19/comey-trump-cnn-news-hook/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;quot;we conclude that Comey’s retention, handling, and dissemination of certain Memos violated Department and FBI policies, and his FBI Employment Agreement. (page 3)&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Comey failed to return Memos 2, 4, 6, and 7 after being removed as FBI Director.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Comey improperly disclosed FBI documents and information.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Comey failed to immediately alert the FBI to the unauthorized disclosure of classified information.&lt;br /&gt;
:*None of the members of Comey's senior leadership team agreed with or defended Comey's view that these Memos were personal in nature. Instead, McCabe, Baker, Priestap, and Rybicki each told the OIG that they considered the Memos to be records of official FBI business between the President and the FBI Director. McCabe described the Memos as a “record of [Comey's] official engagement with the President”; Baker told the OIG that Comey's Memos “were discussed in the office in connection with [Comey's] official responsibilities”; and Priestap characterized the Memos as FBI work product “produced by the Director in his capacity as Director.”  After Comey was removed, the Memos were uploaded to the FBI's case management system in connection with an ongoing FBI investigation and Rybicki took steps to ensure that the original Memos were inventoried and preserved with the rest of the Director's official records.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;quot;We found it particularly concerning that Comey did not tell anyone from the FBI that he had retained copies of the Memos in his personal safe at home, even when his Chief of Staff, the FBI's Associate Deputy Director, and three SSAs came to Comey’s house on May 12, 2017, to inventory and remove all FBI property.&amp;quot; (page 55)&lt;br /&gt;
*First Review of IG Report on James Comey – The Substance Within the Report Shows a Two-Tiered Justice System.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/29/first-review-of-ig-report-on-james-comey-the-substance-within-the-report-shows-a-two-tiered-justice-system/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Byron York and Rep Doug Collins Discuss IG Report on James Comey Conduct.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/29/byron-york-and-rep-doug-collins-discuss-ig-report-on-james-comey-conduct/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Rosenstein Slams Comey For His Corruption, Abuse of Power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/shots-fired-rosenstein-slams-comey-for-his-corruption-abuse-of-power-in-wake-of-doj-ig-report/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Grassley: Comey’s ‘Self-Serving Abuses Of Power’ Did ‘Great Harm’ To FBI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/08/29/grassley-comeys-self-serving-abuses-power-great-harm-fbi/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Epoch Times'':  Comey Leaked Classified Information, Violated FBI Policies, DOJ Watchdog Concludes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/james-comey-violated-multiple-policies-by-leaking-memos-doj-watchdog-concludes_3061316.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sen. Graham's declassification request list to AG Barr.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/LG%20to%20WB%20re%20Declassification%20of%20Materials%20relating%20to%20FISA%20investigation.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''30 August.''' Flynn finally erupted Friday at prosecutors, his legal team accusing top Mueller officials of &amp;quot;malevolent&amp;quot; conduct and withholding evidence relate to Strzok/Page/Ohr/Steele, etc.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/doc/423830982&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;[[Andrew Weissmann|[Andrew] Weissmann]] and Ms. [[Zainab Ahmad|[Zainab] Ahmad]] while at DOJ in 2016-17 were working with [[Bruce Ohr]] (then the fourth highest ranking member of DOJ) to feed information from his wife [[Nellie Ohr|Nellie]] at [[FusionGPS]] and British citizen [[Christopher Steele]] to the FBI through his secret back-channel.   This was happening after the FBI terminated Mr. Steele as a paid informant because he was keeping the press informed of his “findings.”  FusionGPS, Steele, and Ms. Ohr were all working for the [[2016 Clinton campaign|Clinton campaign]]. In addition, Ms. Ohr worked for the [[CIA]].  The entire operation is further compromised by the fact that the second agent who interviewed Mr. Flynn along with former agent [[Peter Strzok|Strzok]], was Bruce Ohr’s contact with the FBI and conducted numerous debriefings of Mr. Ohr—passing along to the FBI the corrupted and false information from the Ohrs, Steele, and FusionGPS.  That agent may also have joined [[Mueller office|Special Counsel’s team]].   Weissmann and Ahmad were not in the DOJ chain of command to be informed by Mr. Ohr at all.  They had no legitimate reason to be privy to his operation with FusionGPS and Christopher Steele. Remarkably, despite this involvement, Mr. Weissmann and Ms. Ahmad then went directly to the Special Counsel team, along with Strzok and possibly the second agent, thereby calling into question the entire investigation with their illicit involvement with Ohr and Steele. Closing the circle, Ahmad was co-counsel with Van Grack in the prosecution of Mr. Flynn.  It is imperative the defense obtain the Bruce Ohr 302s and notes—unredacted—and all evidence of this circuitous and illicit operation.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
*Devin Nunes: “We Have Briefed DOJ on Eight Criminal Referrals – Two for Criminal Conspiracy”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/30/devin-nunes-we-have-briefed-doj-on-eight-criminal-referrals-two-for-criminal-conspiracy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*KEVIN BROCK: The worst is still to come for Jim Comey.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/459379-the-worst-is-still-to-come-for-jim-comey&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff Carlson: Highlights From the IG’s Report on Former FBI Director James Comey.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/08/30/highlights-from-the-igs-report-on-former-fbi-director-james-comey/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff Carlson: Focus in Spygate Scandal Shifts to CIA, Former Director Brennan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/08/30/focus-in-spygate-scandal-shifts-to-cia-former-director-brennan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Court Gives JW New Clinton Email Discovery, Anti-Trump Coup Exposed in Comey/IG Report And More.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8XidbDpEEw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===September 2019===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Early September.''' Sen. [[Chris Murphy]] threatens Ukrainian President Zelensky that if Ukraine co-operates Justice Department into DNC/Ukrainian collision to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. congressional Democrats will withhold funding.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/462658-lets-get-real-democrats-were-first-to-enlist-ukraine-in-us-elections&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Murphy delivered a ''quid pro quo'' message to a foreign power from Senate Democrats offering money in exchange for silence on the Obama administration, 2016 Clinton campaign, and Democratic party's collusion with a foreign power to interfere in U.S. elections.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''1 September.''' Jeff Carlson: Comey’s Trump Tower Meeting Was Used For FBI’s Counterintelligence Investigation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/comeys-trump-tower-meeting-was-used-for-fbis-counterintelligence-investigation_3064569.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLw-cdK827I&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Comey’s testimony to Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector [[Michael Horowitz]] directly counters what he had testified to Congress about his January 6, 2017 briefing of President-elect Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Comey had testified to Congress that he “was briefing [Trump] on it because, because we had been told by the media it was about to launch. We didn’t want to be keeping that from him. He needed to know this was being said. I was very keen not to leave him with an impression that the bureau was trying to do something to him.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*Comey told the inspector general that the information he obtained from his conversation with Trump “ought to be treated…[like] FISA derived information or information in a [counterintelligence] investigation.” &lt;br /&gt;
:*Comey only informed Trump of the “salacious” details contained within the dossier because “that was the part that the leaders of the [[intelligence community]] agreed he needed to be told about.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1804/19/cg.01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Comey-memo-clapper-instruction-january-7-2017.jpg|right|300px|thumb|DNI James Clapper instructed Comey to alert President-elect Trump of the alleged [[blackmail]] information in the hands of the Obama intelligence community and then turned around and leaked to CNN to smear the President-elect.]]&lt;br /&gt;
::*When questioned by the House Intelligence Committee, former Director of National Intelligence [[James Clapper]] at first denied leaking the information to [[Jake Tapper]] of [[CNN]] about Trump being briefed on the &amp;quot;salacious&amp;quot; material by Comey, but ultimately acknowledged having done so.&lt;br /&gt;
::*The HPSCI report on ''Russian Active Measure in the 2016 Election'' says “Clapper’s discussion with Tapper took place in early January 2017, around the time [[IC]] leaders briefed President Obama and President-elect Trump, on ‘the Christopher Steele information,’ a two-page summary of which was ‘enclosed in’ the highly-classified version of the ICA [Intelligence Community Assessment].&amp;quot; The ICA contained two pages of the false &amp;quot;salacious&amp;quot; material from the ''[[Steele dossier]]''.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;House’s Final Report on Russian Active Measures:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“It is important to note that Evan Perez, [[Jim Sciutto]], Jake Tapper, and [[Carl Bernstein]] of CNN reported on January 12, 2016 [original publication was on January 10, 2017], that President-elect Trump was briefed on classified information indicating that the Russians have compromising personal or financial information that the Russians could use against President-elect Trump.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;“The Committee’s investigation revealed that President-elect Trump was indeed briefed on the contents of the Steele dossier and when questioned by the Committee, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper admitted that he confirmed the existence of the dossier to the media.” https://themarketswork.com/2019/09/08/comeys-trump-tower-meeting-was-used-for-fbis-counterintelligence-investigation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*On Jan. 10, 2017, CNN published the article ''“Intel Chiefs Presented Trump With Claims of Russian Efforts to Compromise Him.”'' The allegations within the dossier were made public, and with reporting of the briefings by intelligence community leaders, instant credibility was given to the dossier’s assertions. Immediately following the CNN story, BuzzFeed published the Steele dossier, and the [[Trump–Russia conspiracy]] was pushed into the mainstream.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/04/20/anatomy-of-a-political-smear-confirmed-james-comey-january-briefing-was-scripted-by-clapper-and-brennan-to-create-media-narrative/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*On the following day, Jan. 11, 2017, in a stunning display of hypocrisy, Clapper issued a formal statement where he noted his “profound dismay at the leaks” and denied that the leaks came from within the Intelligence Community.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Comey, Clapper, and others conspired with [[President Obama]] in the [[Oval Office]] on Jan. 5, 2017 to publicly embarrass President-elect Trump with with false information from the ''Steele dossier''.  The very fact that the briefing itself took place provided  the &amp;quot;news hook&amp;quot; CNN was looking for to publicize the unverified information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Hoft: Corrupt US Attorney [[Jessie Liu]] Was Involved in Mueller Cases Where [[Brady material|Evidence Withheld from Defendants]] -Now She’s Involved in Decision on Whether to Indict Crooked Andrew McCabe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/corrupt-us-attorney-jesse-liu-was-involved-in-mueller-cases-where-evidence-withheld-from-defendants-now-shes-involved-in-decision-on-whether-to-indict-crooked-andrew-mccabe/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''2 September.''' The Comey-Brennan Conspiracy To Violate Trump’s Civil Rights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/headlines/archives/2019/09/comey-brennan-conspiracy-violate-trumps-civil-rights/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sara Carter: Lindsey Graham: FISA Warrant Applications Should be Released to Public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/lindsey-graham-fisa-warrant-applications-should-be-released-to-public/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''3 September.''' Margot Cleveland: Michael Flynn’s Attorney Accuses Feds Of Hiding Exculpatory Information About His Case.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/03/michael-flynns-attorney-accuses-feds-hiding-information-favors-case/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sharyl Attkisson]]: 10 things James Comey did wrong, according to the Inspector General.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/09/10-things-james-comey-did-wrong-according-to-the-inspector-general/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Tom Fitton: Comey IG Report Shows That President Trump is a Coup Crime Victim!.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wxfuDqa_ws&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''4 September.''' '''Former Ukranian Prosecutor Viktor Shokin Sworn Affidavit Outlining Joe Biden Shakedown.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/427618359/Shokin-Statement&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew McCabe]] is the keynote speaker for a Pennsylvania Democratic Party keynote fundraiser.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/04/andrew-mccabe-fundraising-for-pennsylvania-democrat-party/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Sharyl Attkisson: What happened to all of the secrets President Trump ordered to be declassified?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/09/what-happened-to-all-of-the-secrets-president-trump-ordered-to-be-declassified/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Devin Nunes]] sues [[FusionGPS]] and [[Campaign for Accountability]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/after-nunes-9-9m-lawsuit-against-fusion-gps-businessman-says-oppo-firm-also-smeared-him.amp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Townhall: Nunes Files Racketeering Lawsuit Against Fusion GPS And Campaign For Government Accountability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/bethbaumann/2019/09/04/nunes-files-racketeering-lawsuit-against-fusion-gps-and-campaign-for-government-a-n2552635&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The Nation]]'': What We Still Do Not Know About Russiagate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thenation.com/article/what-we-still-do-not-know-about-russiagate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*why did Western intelligence agencies, prompted, it seems clear, by US ones, seek to undermine Trump’s presidential campaign?&lt;br /&gt;
:*All of the major pro-détente episodes in the twentieth century had been initiated by Republican presidents: Eisenhower, Nixon, and Reagan.&lt;br /&gt;
:*the repeatedly hapless Comey seems incapable of having initiated such an audacious operation against a presidential candidate, still less a president-elect....John Brennan and James Clapper, head of the CIA and Office of National Intelligence under Obama respectively, are the more likely culprits. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Are Barr and Durham, whose own careers include associations with US intelligence agencies, determined to uncover the truth about the origins of Russiagate? And can they really do so fully, given the resistance already apparent? Even if so, will Barr make public their findings, however damning of the intelligence agencies they may be, or will he classify them? And if the latter, will President Trump use his authority to declassify the findings as the [[2020 presidential election]] approaches in order to discredit the role of Obama’s presidency and its would-be heirs?&lt;br /&gt;
:*how will mainstream media treat the Barr-Durham investigation and its findings? Having driven the Russiagate narrative for so long and so misleadingly—and with liberals perhaps finding themselves in the incongruous position of defending rogue intelligence agencies—will they credit or seek to discredit the findings?&lt;br /&gt;
:*a truly bipartisan, independent investigation based in the senate, as was the Church Committee of the mid-1970s, which exposed and reformed (it thought at the time) serious abuses by US intelligence agencies. That would require, however, a sizable core of non-partisan, honorable, and courageous senators of both parties, who thus far seem to be lacking.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Russiagate is about the present and future of the American political system, not about Russia. (Indeed, as I have repeatedly argued, there is very little, if any, Russia in Russiagate.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''5 September.''' Jerry Dunleavy: ANALYSIS: Mueller and Horowitz reveal Fusion GPS role in both Trump Tower meetings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/analysis-mueller-and-horowitz-reveal-fusion-gps-role-in-both-trump-tower-meetings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[FusionGPS]] information made its way into both the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting cited by Mueller and the January 2017 Trump Tower meeting cited in Horowitz's Comey report.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''7 September.''' 14 Strange Facts in the Flynn Case.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksb8VsOMqQg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:#Flynn’s trip to Russia in 2015, where it was claimed Flynn went without the knowledge or approval of the DIA or anyone in Washington, was proven not to be true.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Flynn was suspected of being compromised by a supposed Russian agent, Cambridge academic Svetlana Lokhova, based on allegations from Western intelligence asset Stefan Halper. This was also proven to be not true.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Flynn’s phone calls with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were framed as being incredibly shady and a potential violation of the Logan Act. This allegation was always preposterous.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Unnamed intelligence officials leaked the details of the Flynn-Kislyak phone calls to The Washington Post.&lt;br /&gt;
:#FBI agents Peter Strzok and Joseph Pientka were dispatched by Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe to interview Flynn at the White House, even though the FBI had already reviewed the transcripts of the calls and cleared Flynn of any crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Both FBI Director James Comey and McCabe testified to Congress that Flynn didn’t lie.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Despite what McCabe and Comey both testified to under oath before Congress, the Mueller special counsel’s office decided to prosecute Flynn for perjury in November of 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
:#The very strange post-dated FD-302 form on the FBI’s January 2017 interview of Flynn that wasn’t filled out until August 2017, almost seven months afterward, is revealed in a court filing by Flynn’s defense team.&lt;br /&gt;
:#FBI agent Pientka became the  “DOJ’s Invisible Man,” despite the fact that Congress has repeatedly called for him to testify. Pientka has remained out of sight and out of mind more than a year and a half since his name first surfaced in connection with the Flynn case.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Judge Rudolph Contreras was removed from the Flynn case immediately after accepting Flynn’s guilty plea and was replaced by Judge Emmit Sullivan.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Sullivan issued what’s known as a [[Brady material|Brady order]] to prosecutors–which ordered them to immediately turn over any exculpatory evidence to Flynn’s defense team. Flynn’s team then made a filing alleging the withholding of exculpatory evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Flynn was given a chance to withdraw his guilty plea by Judge Sullivan but refused, and insisted to go forward with sentencing.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Flynn suddenly fired his lawyers for the past two years and hired Sidney Powell to lead his new legal team following special counsel Robert Mueller’s disastrous testimony to Congress. And now, the latest startling development:&lt;br /&gt;
:#Flynn filed to have the Mueller prosecution team replaced for having withheld exculpatory evidence, despite Sullivan having directly ordered them to hand any such evidence over months ago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/gen-flynns-endgame-approaches_3069105.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''8 September.''' Jeff Carlson: DOJ Emails Reveal Internal Response to ‘Wiretap’ Allegations Against Rosenstein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/doj-emails-reveal-internal-response-to-wiretap-allegations-against-rosenstein_3073852.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''9 September.''' Sara Carter: Justice Department Seeks McCabe’s Text Messages On FBI Probe. What Could It Reveal?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/justice-department-seeks-mccabes-text-messages-on-fbi-probe-what-could-it-reveal/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Schiff letter to Michael Flynn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/425136181/Schiff-Letter-to-Flynn-Powell&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''Red State'': CNN Russian Spy Exfiltration Story Trips All The Bull**** Alarms On Two Continents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2019/09/09/cnn-russian-spy-exfiltration-story-trips-bull-alarms-two-continents/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''10 September.''' Michael Flynn and Sidney Powell Return to Court – Powell Confirms Rosenstein Authorized Targeting of Flynn Jr. for Leverage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/10/michael-flynn-and-sidney-powell-return-to-court-powell-confirms-rosenstein-authorized-targeting-of-flynn-jr-for-leverage/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Chuck Ross: Flynn Lawyer Argues Case Should Be Dismissed Over ‘Egregious Government Misconduct’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/10/flynn-lawyers-dismissal-case-sentencing/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Flynn's interview with the FBi in which he is accused of lying was arranged by then-FBI Deputy Director [[Andrew McCabe]] and conducted by [[Peter Strzok]], the FBI counterintelligence official who was fired for political bias. Flynn’s lawyers have argued that the government failed to provide Strzok’s text messages as exculpatory evidence under the [[Brady rule]].&lt;br /&gt;
:*Brian Cates: Latest Filing in Flynn Case Exposes Strzok and His Complete Lack of Credibility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/latest-filing-in-flynn-case-exposes-strzok-and-his-complete-lack-of-credibility_3076926.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sara Carter: Flynn’s Counsel Says Schiff’s Demands Are ‘transparently pure harassment’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/flynns-counsel-says-rep-adam-schiffs-demands-are-transparently-pure-harassment/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff Carlson: Media Reveal Existence of Russian Source for Trump–Russia Allegations Amid Ongoing John Durham Investigation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/09/10/media-reveal-existence-of-russian-source-for-trump-russia-allegations-amid-ongoing-john-durham-investigation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*ED MORRISSEY: WaPo, NYT: Contra CNN, Trump Was Not The Reason CIA Exfiltrated Asset From Russia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/archives/ed-morrissey/2019/09/10/wapo-nyt-contra-cnn-trump-not-reason-cia-exfiltrated-asset-russia/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Twitchy:'' ‘Fusion GPS Hustle’: Timeline of who met who and WHEN in buildup of CNN’s latest Trump/Russia ‘exclusive’ is ALL so damning.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2019/09/10/fusion-gps-hustle-timeline-of-who-met-who-and-when-in-buildup-of-cnns-latest-trump-russia-exclusive-is-all-so-damning/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Jeff Carlson twitter thread on [[Jim Sciutto]] and CNN's [[fake news]] Russiagate redux scam.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/themarketswork/status/1171071942356393990?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1171072580901453825&amp;amp;ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.redstate.com%2Fstreiff%2F2019%2F09%2F09%2Fcnn-russian-spy-exfiltration-story-trips-bull-alarms-two-continents%2F&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*CIA's Kremlin agent was a 'lackey' who drank too much and complained about his pay, claim furious Russians as he is revealed to have swapped two-room Moscow apartment for $925,000 Virginia home.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7449935/CIAs-Kremlin-agent-lackey-drank-vanished-claim-furious-Russians.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*CNN’s Jim Sciutto is still pimping his debunked ‘CIA Russian spy scoop’ (with some help from Brian Stelter, of course).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitchy.com/sarahd-313035/2019/09/10/cnns-jim-sciutto-is-still-pimping-his-debunked-cia-russian-spy-scoop-with-some-help-from-brian-stelter-of-course/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Townhall:'' GOP Rep Wants Investigation Into Shoddy CNN Spy Story.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2019/09/10/cia-rebuke-wasnt-enoughgop-rep-wants-investigation-into-cnn-spy-story-n2552866&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''11 September.''' Judge Sullivan grants Flynn motion to compel the Mueller team's production of evidence and motion to show cause why it should not be held in contempt. US v Flynn; Case no 17-232-EGS; unsealed Motion to Compel the Production of Brady Material and for an Order to Show Cause.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6401953/9-11-19-Flynn-Motion-to-Compel-Redacted.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Among the 40 bullet points, the motion requests:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The unredacted Page-Strzok text messages as well as text messages, emails and other electronic communications to, from, or between Andrew McCabe, James Comey, [[Rod Rosenstein]], [[Bruce Ohr]], [[Nellie Ohr]], [[John Carlin]], [[Aaron Rouse]], [[Carl Ghattas]], [[Andrew Weissmann]], [[Tashina Gauhar]], [[Michael Steinbach]], [redacted], and [[Zainab Ahmad]], regarding Mr. Flynn or the FISA applications or any surveillance (legal or illegal) that would have reached Mr. Flynn’s communications.  &lt;br /&gt;
:*Any [[Sally Yates]] 302s or other notes that concern Mr. Flynn, including treatment of her meetings with FBI Agents on January 24 and 25, 2017, her meetings with anyone in the White House, and the draft 302 of the Flynn interview on January 24 she reviewed or was read into.   &lt;br /&gt;
:*Information identifying reporters paid by [[Fusion GPS]] and/or the [[Daniel J. Jones|Penn Quarter]] group to push “Russia Collusion,” communications regarding any stories about Mr. Flynn, and any testimony or statements about how the reporters were used by the government regarding Mr. Flynn. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Any information regarding the SCO’s [Special Counsel Office] and DOJ’s destruction of the cell phones of Peter Strzok and Lisa Page (after being advised of the thousands of text messages that evidenced their bias) that has been classified or otherwise not available to the public from the published Inspector General Report.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Any information regarding  eradication of cell phone data, texts, emails, or other information belonging to Peter Strzok and Lisa Page that created the “gap” identified by the IG.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Information about any parts of any polygraph examinations failed by Peter Strzok after Mr. Flynn was first the subject of any FBI investigation—authorized or unauthorized.&lt;br /&gt;
:*All FBI 302s, notes, memoranda of [[James Clapper]] regarding Mr. Flynn, and the cell phone and home phone records of Mr. Clapper and [[David Ignatius]] between December 5, 2016, and February 24, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The government should be ordered to produce the documents listed in this motion and to preserve all documents including phones, texts, and emails of all Special Counsel team members; that the government be ordered to show cause why the prosecutors in this matter should not be held in contempt for their failures to produce all information pursuant to this Court’s Standing Order of February 16, 2018; and that after hearing and full consideration of the facts and law, this Court find the prosecutors in contempt for their failure to respect and abide by this Court’s order...&lt;br /&gt;
:*ORDER: &amp;quot;it is hereby ORDERED that said motion is GRANTED.  The government is hereby ORDERED to show cause why it should not be held in contempt for its violations of this Court’s Standing Brady Order...The government is also ordered to take all steps necessary to preserve all forms of electronic communications, cell phones, and computers of all members of Special Counsel team and the Department of Justice or FBI who communicated with Lisa Page and/or Peter Strzok, whose devices were destroyed.   The government is also ordered to preserve all documents that mention Mr. Flynn.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Chuck Ross: Rod Rosenstein Authorized Mueller To Investigate Flynn’s Son, Sidney Powell Says.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/11/flynn-lawyer-rosenstein-mueller/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Margot Cleveland: Michael Flynn’s Lawyer Explains Why She Needs To View Documents The Government Hasn’t Turned Over.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/11/michael-flynns-lawyer-explains-needs-view-documents-government-hasnt-turned/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Jeff Carlson: Russian Spy Revelation Raises Questions on CIA Information, Potential Links to Steele Dossier.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/09/11/russian-spy-revelation-raises-questions-on-cia-information-potential-links-to-steele-dossier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''The Federalist:'' What Is Really Behind The Deluge Of Leaks About The Extradited Spy?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/10/what-is-really-behind-the-deluge-of-leaks-about-the-extradited-spy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Obama, Not Trump, Outed Russian Spy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/10/obama-not-trump-outed-russian-spy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''12 September:''' Sara Carter: U.S. Attorney moving forward with charges against McCabe Based On IG Report Findings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/u-s-attorney-recommends-moving-forward-with-charges-against-andrew-mccabe/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*U.S. Attorney for DC, Jessie Liu, will likely indict former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe for lying to FBI investigators. The reporting is based on leaked email communications from the lawyers representing Andrew McCabe, where McCabe’s legal appeals to Main Justice and current DOJ Deputy Attorney General James Rosen were rejected.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Gregg Jarrett: Malevolent McCabe’s appointment with justice is imminent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/gregg-jarrett-malevolent-mccabes-appointment-with-justice-is-imminent&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Chuck Ross: Senators: State Department Watchdog Investigated Christopher Steele Meeting, But Failed To Interview Key Participants.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/12/senators-state-department-watchdog-christopher-steele/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*State Department inspector general investigated the October 11, 2016 meeting between Christopher Steele, [[Jonathan Winer]], and Kathleen Kavalec.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The meeting was arranged by Jonathan Winer. The DOS inspector general reviewed  whether Winer “complied with Department policy and regulation on intelligence gathering” and whether he “violated classification protocol.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;/https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2019-09-12%20RHJ,%20CEG%20to%20State%20OIG%20re%20Christopher%20Steele%20Meeting.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A State Department employee was also referred to the standing Office of Special Counsel for “anti-Trump political conduct” that may have violated the [[Hatch Act]], the law that prohibits executive branch employees from engaging in political activity on the job.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The DOS inspector general never interviewed Kavalec or Winer.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The DOS inspector general failed to release a report of its investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Steele told a State Department official a former Russian spy chief and a top Kremlin adviser were involved in an operation to collect compromising information on Donald Trump. The State Department official’s notes also indicate Steele claimed the Russians, Vyacheslav Trubnikov and Vladislav Surkov, were “sources” for the dossier.  There is no evidence the compromising material mentioned in the dossier actually exists, raising questions about whether Steele was given disinformation.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Trubnikov, the former head of the SVR, also has links to Stefan Halper, an FBI informant who had contact with the Trump campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Margot Cleveland: Sidney Powell’s Latest Motion In Michael Flynn’s Case Is A Russiagate Bombshell.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/12/sidney-powells-latest-motion-michael-flynns-case-russiagate-bombshell/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Powell’s bigger plan is to expose the breadth and depth of [[SpyGate]] and how flaying Michael Flynn lay at the heart of the [[Deep State coup|soft coup]] attempt.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Powell requested “any information, including recordings or 302s, about [[Joseph Mifsud]]’s presence and involvement in engaging or reporting on Mr. Flynn and Mifsud’s presence at the ''Russia Today'' dinner in Moscow on December 17, 2015.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*Powell requested “All payments, notes, memos, correspondence, and instructions by and between the FBI, CIA, or DOD with [[Stefan Halper]]—going back as far as 2014—regarding Michael Flynn, Svetlana Lokhova, Mr. [[Richard Dearlove]] (of [[MI6]]), and Professor Christopher Andrew (connected with [[MI5]]) and Halper’s compensation through the DOD [[Office of Net Assessment]] as evidenced by the whistleblower complaint of [[Adam Lovinger]], addressed in our brief.”&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Barry-berke-and-norm-eisen.jpg|250px|right|thumb|Coup operatives Barry Berke (left) and Norm Eisen (right).]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*DECLASSIFIED: Flynn’s Legal Offensive Pushes for Spygate Disclosure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBwdyJwkWHc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Fitton: Rosenstein Coup Plan Involved Wearing a Wire, Invoking 25th Amendment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eU-yGccTDHU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''13 September.''' Chuck Ross: DOJ Inspector General Has Completed FISA Abuse Probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/13/doj-inspector-general-fisa-abuse/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Chuck Ross: Andrew McCabe’s Lawyer Wants To Find Out What The Grand Jury Is Up To.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/13/andrew-mccabe-email-grand-jury-indictment/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Andrew McCabe’s defense attorney, [[Michael Bromwich]] (also the attorney for ‘beach friend’ [[Christine Blasey Ford]] in the [[Kavanaugh smear]]), leaks his communication with U.S. Attorney for DC, [[Jessie Liu]], to the ''New York Times''.&lt;br /&gt;
::*the Lawfare alliance includes: former FBI legal counsel [[James Baker (DOJ)]], former DOJ-NSD lawyer [[David Laufman]] (who also represented [[Monica McLean]], Blasey-Ford’s FBI bestie and narrative engineer friend), former SDNY U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman; Lawfare head [[Benjamin Wittes]]; James Comey’s leaking buddie [[Daniel Richman]];  Obama Administration lawyer Norm Eisen;  criminal defense attorney Barry Berke; and a host of current and former FBI and DOJ foot-soldiers.  &lt;br /&gt;
::*[[Fusion GPS]] is part of the Lawfare network as a distribution hub for research information needed by the journalists who are writing on behalf of the Lawfare need.  Ezra Klein’s “[[Journo-List]]”; the email group of 400+ reporters for multiple media outlets who collectively collaborated on stories.&lt;br /&gt;
::*James Comey, FBI Legal Counsel James Baker, Comey memo recipient Daniel Richman, Deputy AG [[Sally Yates]], Comey friend Benjamin Wittes, FBI lead agent [[Peter Strzok]], FBI counsel [[Lisa Page]], Mueller lead [[Andrew Weissmann]] and the Mueller team of lawyers, all of them -and more- are connected to the [[Lawfare group]]; and this network provides the sounding board for all of the weaponized approaches, including the various new legal theories we saw outlined within the Weissmann-Mueller Report.&lt;br /&gt;
::*The Lawfare continuum is very simple. The corrupt 2015 [[Clinton email scandal]] exoneration; which became the corrupt 2016 DOJ/FBI [[Trump-Russia investigation]]; which became the corrupt 2017 DOJ/FBI [[Mueller probe]]; is currently the 2019 “impeachment” plan. Weissmann and Mueller delivered their report to evolve the plan from corrupt legal theory into corrupt political targeting.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The purpose of Bromwich's letter Jessie Liu is to push information gained within the Lawfare network into the media narrative.   It is transparently obvious that Lawfare allied lawyers who left the U.S. Attorneys Office in DC are leaking what they know to the Lawfare allied members on McCabe’s defense.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Bromwich cannot directly say he is aware of Grand Jury evidence, because such information would be illegal to acquire.  However, current and former DOJ officials can leak to the ''New York Times'' and ''Washington Post'', and Bromwich can then cite the reporting on those leaks.  Everyone knows the game, the bastardization of justice is all done with an internal wink and a nod.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Pushing this information into the public sphere supports the objective of the defense; however, the Lawfare alliance cannot admit how they gained that information -leaks from allies inside the DOJ- because that would be illegal.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Leaks to the ''NYT'' and ''WaPo'' are how the Lawfare alliance push their narrative.  These are the same DOJ/FBI officials who leaked to the same media when constructing the Russian Conspiracy narrative around the [[2016 Trump campaign]].  The same exact people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/13/mccabes-lawfare-alliance-working-with-media-allies-to-frame-defense/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''14. September.''' Scott Ritter: The Spy Who Failed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/09/14/the-spy-who-failed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*There was a Russian spy whose information was used to push a narrative of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election; this much appears to be true. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Everything else that has been reported is either a mischaracterization of fact or an outright fabrication designed to hide one of the greatest intelligence failures in U.S. history — the use by a CIA director of intelligence data specifically manipulated to interfere in the election of an American president. &lt;br /&gt;
:*The consequences of this interference has deleteriously impacted U.S. democratic institutions in ways the American people remain ignorant of — in large part because of the complicity of the U.S. media when it comes to reporting this story. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''15 September.''' Judicial Watch: Docs Reveal State Dept Rushed To Get Classified Info To Anti-Trump Senators Before Inauguration Day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/judicial-watch-docs-reveal-state-dept-rushed-to-get-classified-info-to-anti-trump-senators-before-inauguration-day-video/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Lawfare Group Begins Delegitimizing Supreme Court.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/15/lawfare-group-begins-delegitimizing-supreme-court/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*585 Days Since Susan Rice Email Was Exposed – Content Still Redacted, Why?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/16/585-days-since-susan-rice-email-was-exposed-content-still-redacted-why/#more-171015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''16 September.''' Chuck Ross: Ex-Comey Aide Describes How FBI Chief Prepared For Infamous Trump Tower Meeting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycall.r.com/2019/09/16/comey-trump-tower-dossier-book/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''17 September.''' Nunes: Horowitz Will Likely Find All Four FISA Warrants Against Page Were Illegally Obtained.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-expects-doj-inspector-general-to-find-carter-page-fisa-warrants-illegally-obtained&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''18 September.''' Comey referred for criminal prosecution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/18/james-comey-referred-criminal-prosecution-justice-/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Rep. Meadows: Comey’s Congressional Testimony At Odds With What He Told IG Horowitz, New Referral Needed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-2/2019/09/18/republicans-will-refer-comeys-congressional-testimony-consideration-ig-horowitz/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Chuck Ross: ‘Screw It’: New Book Says Comey Skirted Protocol To Set Up Fateful Michael Flynn Interview.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/09/17/comey-flynn-white-house-interview-ambush/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''19 September.''' '''Jerry Dunleavy: DOJ watchdog Horowitz has been in contact with US attorney responsible for filing charges.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/doj-watchdog-horowitz-has-been-in-contact-with-us-attorney-responsible-for-filing-charges&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Horowitz, who has finished the report on his investigation into abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, has been talking with Durham, who is handling any criminal referrals from the investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
::*The 412 pages of redacted FISA documents released in early 2018 show the DOJ and the FBI made extensive use of British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s unverified dossier, which he put together in 2016 at the behest of the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which was hired by Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee by [[Marc Elias]] of the [[Perkins Coie]] law firm — who was briefed about Steele's findings throughout the race and, in turn, briefed the Clinton campaign too. Steele’s funding from a Democratic presidential campaign and his desire for President Trump to lose the election were concealed by the DOJ and FBI from the FISA court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Rod Rosenstein]] offered to be anonymous source for [[leak]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/JasonLeopold/status/1174819801203535874?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sharyl Atkisson: Indicting a Sandwich (Podcast).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/09/indicting-a-sandwich/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''20 September.''' John Solomon: Missing piece to the Ukraine puzzle: State Department's overture to Rudy Giuliani.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/462422-missing-piece-to-the-ukraine-puzzle-state-departments-overture-to-rudy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The government of Ukraine under both Ukrainian President [[Petro Poroshenko]], and now President [[Volodymyr Zelensky]], had been trying to deliver information about Obama officials and Democrat party officials (DNC on behalf of Hillary Clinton) requesting the government of Ukraine to interfere in the [[2016 presidential election]].&lt;br /&gt;
:*Both Poroshenko and Zelensky administrations had tried, unsuccessfully, to get information to current U.S. officials. U.S. State Department officials in Ukraine were refusing to give [[visa]]’s to Ukrainian emissaries because they did not want the damaging information sent to the [[Trump administration]].&lt;br /&gt;
:*Failing to get help from the U.S. State Department, the Ukrainians hired a respected U.S. lawyer to hand deliver the documentary evidence directly to the U.S. Department of Justice. The contracted American lawyer hand-delivered the information to the [[U.S. Department of Justice]] in [[New York]].&lt;br /&gt;
:*However, after delivering the information and not hearing back from the U.S. government, the Ukrainian government, now led by President Zelensky, interpreted the silence as the Trump administration and U.S. government being upset about the Ukraine involvement overall. Out of concern for a serious [[diplomatic]] breakdown, the Zelensky administration made a personal request to the U.S. State Department for assistance.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The U.S. State Department then reached out to Trump’s lawyer [[Rudy Giuliani]]; and asked him if he would meet with Zelensky’s top lawyer, Andrei Yermak.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Rudy Giuliani agreed to act as a diplomatic intermediary and met with Yermak in [[Spain]]. After the meeting, Giuliani then contacted the State Department Officials in charge of Ukraine and Europe and debriefed them on the totality of the subject matter as relayed by Andrei Yermak.&lt;br /&gt;
:*All of this activity preceded the phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. President Trump and President Zelensky discussed the issues, and this phone call is the one now referenced by the concerned “[[whistleblower]]”. The “whistleblower” obviously had no knowledge of the background and why the subject matter discussed in the phone call was framed as it was.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Apparently in the phone call, President Zelensky was explaining what action the Ukrainian government had already taken to try and get the information about [[corrupt]] U.S. officials, including former [[VP Joe Biden]], to the U.S. government.  It was from this clarification of information that President Trump is reported to have told Zelensky it was OK to proceed with any internal investigation of corruption in Ukraine that might also encompass former U.S. officials.  The “whistle-blower”, knowing only half of the information – incorrectly perceived the conversation.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Four very significant questions/issues become obvious:&lt;br /&gt;
::*(#1) Who in the U.S. State Department [[Kiev]] embassy was blocking the visas of Ukrainian officials, and why?&lt;br /&gt;
::*(#2) Who was the official at the New York office of the DOJ who took custody of the records hand-delivered by the American lawyer working on behalf of Ukraine?…. and&lt;br /&gt;
::*(#3) why were those records never turned over to Main Justice?…. Or&lt;br /&gt;
::*(#4) if they were turned over to Main Justice, why didn’t they inform the Trump administration they had received them?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Margot Cleveland: The Russian Spy Who Wasn’t? Defamation Case Accuses U.S., U.K. Intelligence Of Using Michael Flynn For Spygate Hoax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/20/the-russian-spy-who-wasnt-defamation-case-accuses-u-s-u-k-intelligence-of-using-michael-flynn-for-spygate-hoax/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''22 September.''' ''Washington Examiner:'' Lindsey Graham calls for DOJ to investigate 'the Biden-Ukraine connection'.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lindsey-graham-calls-for-doj-to-investigate-the-biden-ukraine-connection&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Devin Nunes: Biden’s campaign likely coming to an end, thanks to Clinton-linked Ukraine bombshell.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://dennismichaellynch.com/video-bidens-campaign-likely-coming-to-an-end-thanks-to-clinton-linked-ukraine-bombshell-nunes-says/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''23 September.''' '''CRS report facilitated a false impression that ultimately provided a false impetus for the current impeachment inquiry.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.scribd.com/document/427976745/R45345 On September 23, a short time before the whistleblower complaint was legally transmitted from the executive branch to the legislative branch (and the public at large), the Congressional Research Service made an extensive update to their publication on &amp;quot;Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protections.”]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The updated CRS analysis inexplicably claimed that the statute was “not specific on who has the authority for determining whether a complaint, aside from its credibility, constitutes a matter of ‘urgent concern.’” &lt;br /&gt;
:*Contrary to the CRS assertion, the statute is explicit on this point, as Congress has defined it in 50 U.S.C. §3033(k)(5)(G):&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/beebe2.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Two Other Places the Report Misrepresents the Statutes.&lt;br /&gt;
:*It should concern every American that the timing and substance of the updated CRS analysis advances a particular [[partisan]] narrative at the expense of a clear application of the law. The idea that the IC IG can forward a report to Congress about the president and color a complaint about public policy matters as an “urgent concern” to trigger congressional oversight is not supported by the underlying statutes at all.&lt;br /&gt;
:*the timing of the updated report’s release raises additional questions about whether certain congressional staff or members were illegally coordinating with the whistleblower during this IC IG’s review process.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Michael E. DeVine]], listed author of the CRS report, did not respond to the reporter for questions. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Congressional staff commented “It’s a big deal,” and anticipated there would be “subpoenas and discovery of CRS staff emails, communications, etc.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Sara Carter: Judicial Watch documents confirm:&lt;br /&gt;
:1. McCabe Opened Trump Investigation A Day Before #Rosenstein Announced Mueller’s Probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/andrew-mccabe-opened-trump-investigation-a-day-before-rosenstein-announced-muellers-probe/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:2. Rosenstein proposed wearing a wire into the #OvalOffice to 'collect evidence on Trump'.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-releases/judicial-watch-mccabe-memo-details-how-dojs-rosenstein-proposed-wearing-a-wire-into-oval-office-to-record-president-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:3. Evidence that Rosenstein took Mueller into the White House on May 16, 2017, as a set-up to interview Mueller’s pending target&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/24/foia-release-of-mccabe-memo-highlights-much-more-than-rosensteins-wear-a-wire-controversy/#more-171766&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://www.judicialwatch.org/documents/jw-v-doj-mccabe-rosenstein-memo-00388/ ''Judicial Watch vs. DOJ'' MCCABE ROSENSTEIN MEMO 00388]&lt;br /&gt;
*John Solomon: Let's get real: Democrats were first to enlist Ukraine in US elections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/462658-lets-get-real-democrats-were-first-to-enlist-ukraine-in-us-elections&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Sara Carter: Whistleblower Hysteria: Why Democrats Don’t Want To Investigate Joe Biden And Son.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/whistleblower-hysteria-why-democrats-dont-want-to-investigate-joe-biden-and-son/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Devin Nunes on Ukraine Story: “Biden Did the Very Thing Trump is Accused of”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/23/devin-nunes-on-ukraine-story-biden-did-the-very-thing-trump-is-accused-of/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''24 September.''' OLC “Urgent Concern” Determination by the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community.&lt;br /&gt;
:*A complaint from an intelligence-community employee about statements made by the President during a telephone call with a foreign leader does not involve an “urgent concern,” as defined in 50 U.S.C. § 3033(k)(5)(G), because the alleged conduct does not relate to “the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity” under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence. As a result, the statute does not require the Director to transmit the complaint to the congressional intelligence committees.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6429710-OLC-Opinion-Trump-Ukraine-Call.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Acting [[DNI]] James McGuire acted properly.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Isikoff]] of ''[[Yahoo News]]'': [[SSCI|Senate Intel panel]] seeks interview with Ukraine whistleblower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.yahoo.com/senate-intel-panel-opens-bipartisan-inquiry-on-ukraine-whistleblower-180518049.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Burr and Warner of the [[SSCI]] advance whistleblower hoax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/427267179/2019-09-24-Burr-and-Warner-to-Bakaj#from_embed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''04:25 PM EDT.''' Whistelblower complaint uploaded with new revised Whistleblower Complaint Form.&lt;br /&gt;
*Sara Carter: Michael Flynn’s Former Partner Acquitted On All Counts By Judge In Eastern Virginia Court.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://saraacarter.com/michael-flynns-former-partner-acquitted-on-all-counts-by-judge-in-eastern-virginia-court/?utm_source=twitter&amp;amp;utm_medium=social&amp;amp;utm_campaign=social-pug Michael Flynn’s Former Partner Acquitted On All Counts].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/427282559/Rafiekian-Dismissal-Memo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;quot;evidence presented to the jury was insufficient to prove any type of conspiracy and based mainly on hearsay&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Tony Podesta]], [[Vin Weber]] say they were told Justice Department dropped probe into whether they violated foreign lobbying rules.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nalert.blogspot.com/2019/09/tony-podesta-vin-weber-say-they-were.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Klavan]]: How The Right Is Being Played,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbS76e3-J48&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;I'll tell you one of the things I like least about the current political moment is watching conservatives who disagree with one another attack each other's integrity. This is a legitimately difficult moment for thinking conservatives.  [[Conservatism]] as we knew it in the post-[[Reagan]] era has collapsed. It collapsed for good reasons.  It collapsed because it failed to stem the slow growth of the undemocratic [[administrative state]].  It collapsed because it supported the overly ambitious [[George W. Bush|Bush]] freedom agenda which led us into unwinnable wars in [[Afghanistan]], in the [[Middle East]]. And it collapsed because it answered the anguish of [[unemployment]] and despair in the heartland with pompous bromides about the wonders of the [[globalism|global]] [[free market]]s that had destroyed their communities and lives.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Donald Trump is an effect of that collapse.  It's not its cause.  He's a huge American original with huge American flaws.  He's accomplished a great deal for our country - taking the brakes off our [[economy]], restored integrity to our [[judiciary]], begun a necessary reordering of [[international relations]] in a post-[[Cold War]] world, and taken on a corrupt anti-American culture led by a corrupt anti-American news media.  He's also a bullying loudmouth of questionable principles who doesn't always think before he speaks, all of which hurts both him and the country.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But I don't pick on every mistake Donald Trump makes.  I don't call balls and strikes from a neutral umpire-like position because they don't believe the two teams are fighting for the same goals.  I believe the Democrat team has become [[socialistic]] and [[anti-American]].  They say that out loud themselves.  They tout socialism.  They say America was never great.  They oppose the [[First Amendment]] when they seek to ban, intimidate, and de-platform speech they disagree with. They also oppose the [[Second Amendment]], which is the only real guarantee of the First.  They are, as I've said before, enemies of our founding.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The other party, the Republicans led by Trump, seemed to me a bunch of fractious clowns straggling in the generally right direction.  In other words, they seem like a typical American political party.  I don't question the integrity of [[Never Trumper]]s and Trump skeptics. I really don't. But I do think they're making a [[moral]] miscalculation - a mistake, not a sin.  I think their mistake is that they've lifted their own discomfort and uncertainty amidst the collapse of the [[conservative movement]] above the true purposes of our politics which are the preservation of American freedoms and the happiness of the American people.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;To allow the occasional unforced errors of our blowhard president to endanger those purposes is, in my humble opinion, to be played for a fool by our opponents.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;After two and a half years of false accusations against this president, after what looks very much to me like a failed coup attempt by the Obama intelligence community, after a cover-up committed by the very news media whose job it is to expose cover-ups - I think that now every single charge against Trump, and each consecutive impeachment hysteria, should be laughed out of court until (A) it's proven real and (B) it's shown to be worth handing our country over to the internal enemies of its first principles.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;If Trump himself ever becomes a danger to those principles, and I mean an actual danger, not a rhetorical danger, I will turn and rip into him like a tiger.  But so far it's not even close.  He hasn't endangered our principles, not even a little. And until he does my response to leftist charges against him is - prove it,  you un-American low-lives, or sit down, wallow in your own disgrace, and shut the hell up.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''25 September.''' '''Jerry Dunleavy: US Attorney John Durham looking into Ukrainian involvement in 2016 election.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/u-s-attorney-john-durham-looking-into-ukrainian-involvement-in-2016-election&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*John Solomon: Democrats Attempted To Collude With Ukraine In 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/25/john_solomon_democrats_attempted_to_collude_with_ukraine_in_2016.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Ukraine’s top prosecutor opens an investigation into whether his country’s law enforcement apparatus intentionally leaked financial records during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign about [[Paul Manafort]] in an effort to influence the election of Hillary Clinton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/435029-as-russia-collusion-fades-ukrainian-plot-to-help-clinton-emerges&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*A [[whistleblower]] complaint addressed to Sen. Richard Burr and Rep. [[Adam Schiff]] was marked &amp;quot;urgent concern&amp;quot; alleging collusion between President Trump and President Zelensky.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/20190812_-_whistleblower_complaint_unclass.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Intelligence community]] Inspector General (ISIG) and Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) determined the complaint was not of &amp;quot;urgent concern&amp;quot; and [[DNI]] James McGuire acted properly.The Dept. of Justice Office of Legal Counsel strongly rebuked ICIG [[Michael Atkinson]]’s original granting whisteleblower status based on [[hearsay]]. interpretation of his responsibility with the complaint.  In the OLC opinion, they point out that Atkinson’s internal justification for accepting the whistleblower complaint was poor legal judgement.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;quot;The complainant describes a hearsay report that the President, who is not a member of the intelligence community, abused his authority or acted unlawfully in connection with foreign diplomacy.....it does not follow that the alleged misconduct by the President concerns “the funding, administration, or operation of an intelligence activity within the responsibility and authority” of the DNI because the allegations do not arise in connection with any such intelligence activity at all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6429710-OLC-Opinion-Trump-Ukraine-Call.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
:*The complaint is riddled with hearsay evidence: “I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials,” “officials have informed me,” “officials with direct knowledge of the call informed me,” “the White House officials who told me this information,” “I was told by White House officials,” “the officials I spoke with,” “I was told that a State Department official,” “I learned from multiple U.S. officials,” “One White House official described this act,” “Based on multiple readouts of these meetings recounted to me,” “I also learned from multiple U.S. officials,” “The U.S. officials characterized this meeting,” “multiple U.S. officials told me,” “I learned from U.S. officials,” “I also learned from a U.S. official,” “several U.S. officials told me,” “I heard from multiple U.S. officials,” and “multiple U.S. officials told me.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*The complaint is the same structure as the ''[[Steele Dossier]]''.  No direct knowledge; no direct evidence to the claims; second-hand gossip, rumors from people who might have known another person to have overheard something, mixed with prior media reports to narrate a story as told by the author. &lt;br /&gt;
:*The complainant also falsely alleged that Trump told Zelensky that he should keep the current prosecutor general at the time, Yuriy Lutsenko, in his current position in the country. The transcript showed that exchange also did not happen.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The complaint falsely alleged that T. Ulrich Brechbuhl, a U.S. State Department official, was a party to the phone call between Trump and Zelensky.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The complaint alleged that Trump demanded that Ukraine physically return multiple servers potentially related to ongoing investigations of foreign interference in the 2016 elections, the transcript of the call between Trump and Zelensky shows that such a request was never made.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/26/busted-anti-trump-whistleblower-botched-yet-another-major-allegation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Letter from Democrat Sens. [[Robert Menendez]], [[Dick Durbin]], and [[Patrick Leahy]] to Ukrainian prosecutor [[Yuriy Lutsenko]] resurfaces, demanding investigations into Trump continue, threatening to cut off U.S. aid.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/5-4-18%20Menendez%20joint%20letter%20to%20General%20Prosecutor%20of%20Ukraine%20on%20Mueller%20investigation.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.westernjournal.com/3-dem-senators-wrote-ukraine-demanding-trump-investigations-continue-arguably-threatened-aid/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Ken Vogel of ''[[NYT]]'': The Ukrainians weren't made aware that the assistance was being delayed/reviewed until more than one month after the call.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/kenvogel/status/1176882766597767168?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''26 September.''' Acting DNI James McGuire [[HPSCI]] testimony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*John Solomon: Ukrainian documents cast doubt on Biden's claim that firing prosecutor had nothing to do with Burisma.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story#.XY02ewYDEV8.twitter&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Breitbart]]'': Dossier 2.0: ‘Whistleblower’ Complaint Relies on Soros-Funded ‘Investigative Reporting’ Group that Partnered with BuzzFeed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/26/dossier-2-0-whistleblower-complaint-relies-on-soros-funded-investigative-reporting-group-that-partnered-with-buzzfeed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The alleged whistleblower report cites the [[OCCRP]]  (Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project),  a [[Soros]] Open Society Foundations funded entity.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The referenced OCCRP report is a “joint investigation” by OCCRP and [[BuzzFeed News]]. The whistleblower report does not mention BuzzFeed News, however, only OCCRP.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The OCCRP claims it is a “non-profit media organization providing an investigative reporting platform for the OCCRP Network.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Carl Bernstein]]: Sources say William Barr preparing to deliver 'evidence' of a 'deep state conspiracy'.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/carl-bernstein-sources-say-william-barr-preparing-to-deliver-evidence-of-a-deep-state-conspiracy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marc Elias]] provide a Statement of Work from [[Crowdstrike]] on behalf of [[Perkins Coie]]'s client's, the [[DNC]] and [[DCCC]] in the [[Roger Stone]] case. The filing is in excess of 90% redacted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/427619989/DEMOCRATIC-NATIONAL-COMMITTEE-AND-DCCC-S-NOTICE-REGARDING-FILING-OF-SUPPLEMENTAL-EXHIBITS&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''27 September.''' '''Sean Davis: Intel Community Secretly Gutted Requirement Of First-Hand Whistleblower Knowledge.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/27/intel-community-secretly-gutted-requirement-of-first-hand-whistleblower-knowledge/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Whistleblower-complain-revision-1.jpg|right|300px|thumb|The ICIG changed the whistleblower form to allow [[hearsay]] evidence two days before a complaint was filed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ClimateAudit/status/1177580473566093312&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*Between May 2018 and August 2019, the intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings. This raises questions about the intelligence community’s behavior regarding the August submission of a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump. The new complaint document no longer requires potential whistleblowers who wish to have their concerns expedited to Congress to have direct, first-hand knowledge of the alleged wrongdoing that they are reporting.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The brand new version of the whistleblower complaint form, which was not made public until after the transcript of Trump’s July 25 phone call with the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and the complaint addressed to Congress were made public, eliminates the first-hand knowledge requirement and allows employees to file whistleblower complaints even if they have zero direct knowledge of underlying evidence and only “heard about [wrongdoing] from others.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*The internal properties of the newly revised “Disclosure of Urgent Concern” form, which the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) requires to be submitted under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA), show that the document was uploaded on September 24, 2019, at 4:25 p.m., just days before the anti-Trump complaint was declassified and released to the public. The markings on the document state that it was revised in August 2019, but no specific date of revision is disclosed.&lt;br /&gt;
:*It is not known precisely when the August 2019 revision to the whistleblower complaint form was approved, nor is it known which, if any, version of the Disclosure of Urgent Concern form the complainant completed prior to addressing his complaint to Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sean Davis tweet: &amp;quot;I talked to a DNI official and asked when these revisions were made and why. The official said the intelligence community would not comment on anything to do with the anti-Trump whistleblower.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;I never mentioned or asked about the anti-Trump whistleblower.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/1177692078119280641&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*CTH: Phase #2 – With Newly Authorized: “Heard From Others”, Lawfare Group Circles Back To Trump-Kislyak Meeting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/27/phase-2-with-newly-authorized-heard-from-others-lawfare-group-circles-back-to-trump-kislyak-meeting/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson ask for a renewed investigation into the “brazen efforts by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton campaign to use the government of Ukraine for the express purpose of finding negative information on Trump.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://arcve.is/CqwIC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/articles/hillary-clinton-and-ukraine-56988171129&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*the: DNC reportedly hired a Ukrainian-American operative named Alexandra Chalupa to investigate the Trump campaign's ties to Ukraine. They first asked the DOJ to investigate back in July 2017, including allegations that Chalupa was looking into Paul Manafort's relationship to Ukrainian officials.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|According to the Justice Department, U.S. Attorney John Durham is &amp;quot;exploring the extent to which ... Ukraine, played a role in the counterintelligence investigation&amp;quot; during the 2016 election. 14 However, the Justice Department has yet to inform Congress and the public whether it has begun an investigation into links and coordination between the Ukrainian government and individuals associated with the campaign of Hillary Clinton or the Democratic National Committee. Ukrainian efforts, abetted by a U.S. political party, to interfere in the 2016 election should not be ignored. Such allegations of corruption deserve due scrutiny, and the American people have a right to know when foreign forces attempt to undermine our democratic processes....Ukrainian prosecutors have unsuccessfully been trying to get information to Justice Department officials since the summer of 2018, possibly including &amp;quot;[h]undreds of pages of never-released memos and documents ... [that] conflict with Biden's narrative&amp;quot; 17 that his actions in Ukraine had nothing to do with his son's connections to [[Burisma]]. In light of this reporting, has the Justice Department obtained or been offered documents from Ukrainian officials related to these matters? If so, what were those documents?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09-27%20CEG%20RHJ%20to%20DOJ%20%28Ukraine%20DNC%29.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Impeachment: John Brennan And Obama’s Intel Ops Strike Again.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dickmorris.com/impeachment-john-brennan-and-obamas-intel-ops-strike-again/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Townhall:'' Democrats Own The Ukraine Scandal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/sarahlee/2019/09/27/democrats-own-the-ukraine-scandal-n2553829&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Nunes: Ukrainian whistleblower is no different than Russia hoax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vIOquHZ1XWA&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The information in the ''Steele dossier'' came from Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The origins of the Russia probe came from Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Whistle-blower Complaint is The Schiff Dossier – Devin Nunes Discusses the Creation of The “Schiff Dossier”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/27/whistle-blower-complaint-is-the-schiff-dossier-devin-nunes-discusses-the-creation-of-the-schiff-dossier/#more-172105&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Lawfare network constructed the whistelblower complaint, and handed it to allied CIA operative Michael Barry to file as a formal IC complaint.  This process is almost identical to the Fusion-GPS/Lawfare network handing the Steele Dossier to the FBI to use as the evidence for the 2016/2017 Russia conspiracy.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The “Schiff Dossier”, aka “whistle-blower” complaint was a constructed effort of allied members within congress and the intelligence apparatus to renew the impeachment effort.  The intelligence team, including the ICIG, changed the whistleblower form to allow the CIA to insert the Schiff Dossier, written by Lawfare.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:800px-Benjamin Wittes, 2013.jpg|175px|right|thumb|'''Benjamin Wittes''' of [[Lawfare]], associated with the Brookings Institution, has been in the forefront of the political weaponization of Law providing the sketchy legal framework under which both the 2017 [[Deep State coup]] and the 2019 [[impeachment inquiry]] were carried out.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*Whistleblower driven by political motives: former CIA analyst.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWiqTncrESw&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benjamin Wittes]]: BOOM!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1177744988370853889?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jon Voight]]: THIS IS WAR!!!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrpqYU0Zjpw&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: DOJ Clarifies Their Position on Declassification – “Delegated Authority”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/27/doj-clarifies-their-position-on-declassification-delegated-authority/#more-172145&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The current institutional priority appears to be protecting Rod Rosenstein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/5dqYHDB10og&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Breitbart:'' State Department Widens Investigation into Clinton Email Server.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/28/state-department-widens-investigation-into-clinton-email-server/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*State Department officials informed up to 130 Clinton aides that they were found to be “culpable” of handling information that was classified lower than they should have been when transmitted through the private server.&lt;br /&gt;
:*An FBI examination of Clinton’s server found over 100 emails containing classified information, including 65 emails deemed “Secret” and 22 deemed “Top Secret”. &lt;br /&gt;
:*experts charge Clinton broke multiple laws, including 18 U.S. Code § 1924, which forbids “unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material.”  And yet, the FBI determined in July 2016 that Clinton did not commit any crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
:*In June 2018, Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz issued a stinging rebuke of the FBI’s handling of the investigation. The federal watchdog’s report labeled Comey’s conduct during the probe as “insubordinate.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''28 September.''' CTH: Pelosi’s House Rule Changes are Key Part of “Articles of Impeachment”, Being Drafted Over Next Two Weeks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/28/pelosis-house-rule-changes-are-key-part-of-articles-of-impeachment-being-drafted-over-next-two-weeks/#more-172169&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*There are 31 House districts currently held by Democrats which President Trump won in 2016; [[Pelosi]] is giving those members an opportunity to make their impeachment case to their constituents now, but failure to support the effort is likely not optional for all except a few of the most tenuously vulnerable.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Chad Pergram: The current House breakdown is 235 Democrats, 199 Republicans, and one independent: Rep. Justin Amash, I-Mich. To pass anything in the House, 218 yeas are needed.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;That means Democrats can only lose 17 votes from their side and still have enough to pass an article of impeachment. Amash has endorsed impeachment, so let’s say the magic number is actually 16. If the president is to be impeached, that means Democrats could have 15 of their own voting for articles of impeachment while representing a district which Trump carried in 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry-work-will-go-on-even-with-house-in-recess.print&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Harmeet Dhillon of the Republican National Lawyers Association: We’ll Remember Those Republicans Who Don’t Stand With Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/IfIO6niXLy4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Attorney General Bill Barr Visits Italy on “Official Business”? – Remember That Audio-Tape Deposition by Joseph Mifsud?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/28/attorney-general-bill-barr-visits-italy-on-official-business-remember-that-audio-tape-deposition-by-joseph-mifsud/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* Rep. [[Thomas Massie]] tweeted about CRS fake report corruption scandal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1177900853782601728?s=20&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''29 September.''' How to Finance Your Congressional Campaign with Arms Sales - exposē on Adam Schiff's relationship with Ukrainian arms dealer Igor Pasternak.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://apelbaum.wordpress.com/2019/09/29/how-to-finance-your-congressional-campaign-with-arms-sales/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*How a Ukrainian arms dealer Igor Paternak floated Adam Schiff’s 2013 election to Congress and Paternak’s linkage to Nancy Pelosi Ukrainian influence network in the US.&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Federalist:'' Burisma Investigation Timeline Just Leads To More Questions About Hunter Biden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/29/timeline-of-the-burisma-investigation-doesnt-exculpate-hunter-biden-it-just-leads-to-more-questions/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Scott Pelly]] Leads ''[[60 Minutes]]'' Impeachment Coverage With Lie: “Whistleblower Under Federal Protection”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/29/scott-pelley-leads-60-minutes-impeachment-coverage-with-lie-whistleblower-under-federal-protection/#more-172349&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''30 September.''' CTH: '''Lawfare (Via WaPo) Enters Narrative Construction – Bill Barr Working With Foreign Governments on 2016 Election Investigation.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/30/lawfare-via-wapo-enters-narrative-construction-bill-barr-working-with-foreign-governments-on-2016-election-investigation/#more-172407&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Team Obama consists of: John Brennan, Susan Rice, James Clapper, James Comey, James Rybicki, Loretta Lynch, John Carlin, Samantha Power and all former White House officials.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Team Clinton consists of: ¹Andrew McCabe, ¹Sally Yates, ¹James Baker, ²Mary McCord, ¹Dana Boente, ²David Laufmann, ¹Mike Kortan, ¹Peter Strzok, ¹Lisa Page, ¹Nellie Ohr, ¹Bruce Ohr, ²John Podesta and essentially all of the former DOJ/FBI small group who are also currently operating within the ³Mueller operation and ³Lawfare (Benjamin Wittes) community.  NOTE: Team Clinton has three sub-sets: ¹direct involvement; ²indirect involvement; and ³cover-up.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Team Obama was more of an assisting co-conspiracy role; and Team Clinton was more of a direct conspiracy role. Team Clinton has direct legal exposure. Team Obama has indirect legal exposure.&lt;br /&gt;
:*the ‘resistance’ groups, writ large, have allies in Main Justice keeping close tabs on Durham and Barr.  These leaks to ''WaPo'' and ''Times'' indicate spies embedded in Main Justice are feeding information to their media allies.&lt;br /&gt;
:*given the known involvement of the [[CIA]] in constructing recent events around the “whistleblower” narrative; and considering the history of ''The Washington Post'' as an outlet to promote the agenda of the CIA; there’s a possibility these articles are constructed to stop the public from pressuring AG Bill Barr.&lt;br /&gt;
:*those who demand a full accounting for the corruption and weaponization we know to exist must keep demanding accountability.  Those who constructed the coup effort against President Trump will not relent in their effort to see him removed.  Impeachment is their best defense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*CTH: Deep State Impeachment Team Racing Against Time, Durham and Barr – NY Times Aids With Australian Narrative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/30/deep-state-impeachment-team-racing-against-time-durham-and-barr-ny-times-aids-with-australian-narrative/#more-172393&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Deep State Impeachment Team Racing Against Time, Durham and Barr – NY Times Aids With Australian Narrative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/30/deep-state-impeachment-team-racing-against-time-durham-and-barr-ny-times-aids-with-australian-narrative/#more-172393&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*the principals connected to the 2016 weaponization of the intelligence apparatus, DOJ and FBI are increasingly concerned about U.S. Attorney John Durham and Attorney General Bill Barr looking at the origins of “Spygate” and the Trump-Russia narrative.  Lawfare and their media outlets are leading their defensive-based offensive.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Stefan Halper]] (U.K.), Joseph Mifsud (Italy) and [[Alexander Downer]] (Australia) all played a key part in helping CIA Director John Brennan assemble his two-page Electronic Communication (EC) that initiated the FBI to start “Crossfire Hurricane.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*All of the Obama-era officials (specifically those who weaponized government in 2016 to target their political opposition) are using the “IC anonymous whistleblower” approach in an attempt to paint any current inquiry as Trump weaponizing the investigation of their coup effort.  Any effort by President Trump to expose the 2016 misconduct is now spun to be President Trump weaponizing his office to target his political opposition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Mollie Hemingway: Senators Demand Answers On DNC Efforts To Get Ukrainian Dirt On Trump In 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/30/senators-demand-answers-on-dnc-efforts-to-get-ukrainian-dirt-on-trump-in-2016/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Margot Cleveland: Did The Inspector General’s Office Help The ‘Whistleblower’ Try To Frame Trump?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/30/deleted-firsthand-knowledge-requirement-for-whistleblowers-implicates-another-federal-agency/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''The Federalist:'' Deleted Firsthand Knowledge Requirement For Whistleblowers Implicates Another Federal Agency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/30/deleted-firsthand-knowledge-requirement-for-whistleblowers-implicates-another-federal-agency/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*the purportedly nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS) may have been weaponized to mislead members of Congress and the American people — all in the name of advancing the impeachment process against President Trump. &lt;br /&gt;
::*The CRS report facilitated a false impression that ultimately provided a false impetus for the current impeachment inquiry.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Epoch Times:'' Trump Asks Who Changed Whistleblower Rules Before Submittal of ‘Fake Whistleblower Report’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/trump-asks-who-changed-whistleblower-rules-before-submittal-of-fake-whistleblower-report_3101151.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*ICIG Michael Atkinson Attempts Four-Page Justification for Changing “Urgent Concern” Whistle-blower Guidelines.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://t.co/49VOLjjZFi?amp=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/30/icig-michael-atkinson-attempts-four-page-justification-for-changing-urgent-concern-whistle-blower-guidelines/#more-172433&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Schiff's Staffer Traveled to Ukraine, Trip Was Paid for by Group Funded by Hunter Biden's Old Firm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/nick-arama/2019/09/30/schiffs-staffer-traveled-to-ukraine-in-august-his-trip-was-paid-for-by-group-funded-by-hunter-bidens-former-company/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Hoft: Pelosi NECK DEEP in Ukraine – Female Ukrainian Party Girl Connected to Military and Government is Her Legislative Aide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/breaking-exclusive-pelosi-neck-deep-in-ukraine-legislative-aide-is-linked-to-ukrainian-military-and-government/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: The U.S. Senate Has a Survival Interest in Supporting Impeachment Effort.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/09/30/the-u-s-senate-has-a-survival-interest-in-supporting-impeachment-effort/#more-172460&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*In 2016 a branch of the United States government (Legislative) was attempting a soft-coup against the leader of another branch of government (Executive); by using the [[Senate Intelligence Committee]] and designated corrupt agents within the executive branch cabinet… In 2019 the effort shifted to the [[House Intelligence Committee]].&lt;br /&gt;
::*[[Dan Jones]] talking to [[Christopher Steele]] in 2017 is critical to understanding what was going on after Trump won the election.  Jones raised $50 million from those who were behind the 2016 stop Trump effort, and the purpose was now the 2017 impeachment effort. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Secondary documentation of the connection between the DOJ, FBI, Fusion, and Dan Jones shows up in the FBI investigative 302 notes of [[Bruce Ohr]], released by Judicial Watch. [Pay attention to the May 8th, 2017, interview – pg 18, 19 of pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*This is where Bruce Ohr is talking about Dan Jones efforts as they were currently aligned with [[Fusion GPS]]: “and had been on the staff of the [Senate Intelligence Committee]”…. “At the time of the interview [Jones] was working with the [Vice Chairman of the Committee Mark Warner]”… etc..  Jones having left the SSCI (now outside govt.) then paid Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS to keep up their efforts. As you can see from the texts, Jones was now talking in person (“coming to see you”) to SSCI Vice-Chair [[Mark Warner]] in April 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
::*The small group in the DOJ and FBI planned to pass-off the Trump investigation to a special counsel. The centerpiece of that investigation would be using the dossier as justification for a need to investigate Trump as a Russian risk. The DOJ/FBI small group needed [[Glenn Simpson]] and Chris Steele to stand by the false narrative all of the players had assembled over the prior year.&lt;br /&gt;
::* In 2018 the DOJ and FBI covered-up the corruption evident during the 2017 pre-Mueller effort.&lt;br /&gt;
::*the [[State Department]] was feeding “classified information” to multiple U.S. Senators on the Senate Intelligence Committee by the [[Obama administration]] immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The documents reveal that among those receiving the classified documents were Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), Sen. [[Ben Cardin]] (D-MD), and Sen. [[Robert Corker]] (R-TN).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Judicial Watch obtained the documents through a June 2018 Freedom of Information Act ([[FOIA]]) lawsuit filed against the State Department after it failed to respond to a February 2018 request seeking records of the Obama State Department’s last-minute efforts to share classified information about Russia election interference issues with Democratic Senator Ben Cardin (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:18-cv-01381)).  The documents reveal the Obama State Department urgently gathering classified Russia investigation information and disseminating it to members of Congress within hours of Donald Trump taking office.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===October 2019=== &lt;br /&gt;
*'''1 October.''' CTH: Confirmation – Bill Barr and John Durham Listened to Mifsud Audio-Tape Deposition in Italy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/01/confirmation-bill-barr-and-john-durham-listened-to-mifsud-audio-tape-deposition-in-italy/#more-172558&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Trey Gowdy]], told Maria Bartiromo he had seen transcripts of the [[Halper]]/Turk operation, and those transcripts exonerate [[Papadopoulos]]:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PohFoeETF4&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Daily Beast:'' Barr Went to Rome to Hear a Secret Tape from Joseph Mifsud, the Professor Who Helped Ignite the Russia Probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/barr-went-to-rome-to-hear-a-secret-tape-from-joseph-mifsud-the-professor-who-helped-ignite-the-russia-probe?ref=home&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The Italian Justice Ministry public records show that Mifsud had applied for police protection in [[Italy]] after disappearing from Link University where he worked and, in doing so, had given a taped deposition to explain just why people might want to harm him.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Barr and Durham were played the tape.  Durham were shown other evidence the Italians had on Mifsud. &lt;br /&gt;
:*''London Guardian:'' William Barr discussed FBI Russia inquiry with UK intelligence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/oct/01/william-barr-us-attorney-general-discussed-mueller-inquiry-uk-intelligence&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Prosecution Responds to Flynn Discovery Motion – Government Refuses to Provide Any Additional Evidence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/01/prosecution-responds-to-flynn-discovery-motion-government-refuses-to-provide-any-additional-evidence/#more-172530&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*CTH: Flynn Lawyer Tells Judge Motive Behind Why Flynn Took Guilty Plea.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/01/smart-move-flynn-lawyer-tells-judge-motive-behind-why-flynn-took-guilty-plea/#more-172512&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Margot Cleveland: New Evidence Suggests Prosecutors Pressured Michael Flynn To Lie.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;New Evidence Suggests Prosecutors Pressured Michael Flynn To Lie.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Stephen Miller: “The Deep State is Terrified of Being Exposed”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlqx1n_k6ts&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*''New York Post:'' Dems, media aim to squash Barr’s probe of Russia-collusion hoax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2019/10/01/dems-media-aim-to-squash-barrs-probe-of-russia-collusion-hoax/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*What Democrats and their media allies really want is to torpedo Attorney General William Barr’s probe into the origins of the Russian “collusion” hoax.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The whistleblower complaint and the manic news reports of the Australia call both serve the same dual-purpose: to ­advance the anti-Trump operation and to shield its perpetrators by smearing Barr and thereby discrediting the investigations under his authority.&lt;br /&gt;
:*the whistleblower’s written complaint, based entirely on second- and third-hand information, presents Trump’s request that the Ukrainian leader work with Barr to “get to the bottom” of the collusion hoax as part of the alleged quid pro quo. That suggests the whistleblower and his confreres in the ­intelligence apparatus are worried about Barr’s investigation and what it could ­uncover about their spying on the Trump campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The FBI’s anti-Trump investigation began in July 2016, based on a tip from Alexander Downer, then Australia’s envoy to Britain. He alleged that onetime Trump adviser George ­Papadopoulos had told him that the Russians had damaging ­information on Clinton.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Barr is interested in Joseph Mifsud. The Rome-based academic hasn’t been heard from in nearly two years. Well-known to Italian and other Western intelligence services, Mifsud is alleged to have told Papadopoulos about Russia possessing dirt on Clinton. If Mifsud is a Russian agent, as former FBI director James Comey alleged, [[NATO]] countries will spend years assessing the damage. If he isn’t, it’s evidence that Comey’s FBI wasn’t probing the Trump campaign — but running a sting operation against it.&lt;br /&gt;
:*count on the continued efforts of Democrats and anti-Trump operatives in the intelligence community and media to discredit Barr. They have to stay on offense — or risk exposure.&lt;br /&gt;
*Sean Davis: Top Lawmakers Tell Intel Community Inspector General: Come Clean On Secret Changes To Whistleblower Rules.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/30/top-lawmakers-tell-intel-community-inspector-general-come-clean-on-secret-changes-to-whistleblower-rules/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''The Federalist:'' Intel IG Admits It Secretly Erased ‘First-Hand Information’ Requirement In August.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/30/intel-ig-admits-it-secretly-erased-first-hand-information-requirement-in-august/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''The Federalist:'' Left Tries To Wave Away IG Changes Allowing Whistleblowers To Weaponize Hearsay.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/01/left-tries-to-wave-away-ig-changes-allowing-whistleblowers-to-weaponize-hearsay/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''The Federalist:'' CBS’ ‘60 Minutes’ Stands By Its Bogus Reporting That Whistleblower Is Under Federal Protection.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/30/cbs-60-minutes-stands-by-bogus-reporting-whistleblower-under-federal-protection/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Dick Morris]]: The Fired Ukraine Prosecutor Was Investigating Hunter Biden.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dickmorris.com/the-fired-ukraine-prosecutor-was-investigating-hunter-biden-lunch-alert/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Hoft: BILLIONS of [[IMF]] and US Funds Looted and Lost by Bank Connected to Burisma Holdings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/must-read-ukraine-burisma-story-is-massive-involves-billions-of-imf-and-us-funds-looted-and-lost-by-bank-connected-to-burisma-holdings/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''2 October.''' CTH: '''FOIA Release Highlights Rosenstein White House Visit With Mueller as a Target Interview.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/02/foia-release-highlights-rosenstein-white-house-visit-with-mueller-as-a-target-interview/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''FOIA release confirm Rosenstein took Mueller to interview the target of investigation, not for an interview as Comey's successor; Rosenstein was part of [[Deep State coup 1.0]].'''&lt;br /&gt;
*''Townhall'': Schiff Knew About Whistleblower Complaint Before It Was File.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2019/10/02/nyt-adam-schiff-knew-about-whistleblower-complaint-before-it-was-even-formally-f-n2554069 Schiff Knew About Whistleblower Complaint Before It Was Filed].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: Inspector General Identifies DC U.S. Attorney Leaking Grand Jury Evidence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/02/inspector-general-identifies-dc-u-s-attorney-leaking-grand-jury-evidence/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*One possibility for the identity of the leaker is Asst. U.S. Attorney Deborah Curtis who recently withdrew from cases involving: Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn and [[Concord Management LLC]], all cases stemming from Mueller and the scheme team prosecutions. [Emphasis: This is speculation].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Brennan urges Trump's removal from office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/JohnBrennan/status/1179485989854744576?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''3 October.''' ''Epoch Times:'' Justice Department to Question Brennan in ‘Spygate’ Inquiry.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/justice-department-to-question-brennan-in-spygate-inquiry_3105102.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Paul Sperry: The Democrat whistleblower who complained about Trump digging up dirt in Ukraine was himself helping dig up dirt in Ukraine against Trump (and Manafort) while working in the Obama White House during 2016 campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1179962400554008576?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The whistleblower is a registered Democrat &amp;amp; CIA analyst who was detailed before the 2016 election to the Obama White House,where he worked on the NSC's Ukraine desk &amp;amp; met w anti-Trump Ukrainian officials before being sent packing by the Trump NSC &amp;amp; becoming disgruntled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1179932368725041152?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''4 October.''' ''[[Reuters]]:'' '''Trump orders 'substantial' cut in National Security Council staff: Bloomberg.''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-security/trump-orders-substantial-cut-in-national-security-council-staff-bloomberg-idUSKBN1WK02X&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sean Davis: Anti-Trump Whistleblower Concealed Contacts With House Democrats From Inspector General.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/04/report-anti-trump-whistleblower-concealed-contacts-with-house-democrats-from-inspector-general/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Whistleblower did not disclosed to the ICIG his contacts with Schiff committee prior to filing - a felony.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitchy.com/dougp-3137/2019/10/04/thats-a-felony-guess-what-the-whistleblower-reportedly-did-not-feel-the-need-to-blow-the-whistle-about-with-the-ig/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Schiff coached  the whistleblower.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''PJ Media:'' Report: Ex-CIA Impeachment Whistleblower Dug Up Dirt on Trump in Ukraine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/trending/report-ex-cia-impeachment-whistleblower-dug-up-dirt-against-trump-in-ukraine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Whistle-Blower Worked For A Current 2020 Democrat Presidential Candidate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/10/04/news-breaks-whistle-blower-worked-current-2020-democrat-candidate/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sean Davis: Testimony From Ukraine Envoy Kurt Volker Directly Contradicts Democrats’ Impeachment Narrative.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/04/testimony-from-ukraine-envoy-kurt-volker-directly-contradicts-democrats-impeachment-narrative/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''5 October.''' '''CTH: Nancy Pelosi is “Grubering” The American Electorate on Impeachment – Committee Requests, aka “Subpoenas”, Constructed to Manufacture “Obstruction”'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/05/nancy-pelosi-is-grubering-the-american-electorate-on-impeachment-committee-requests-aka-subpoenas-constructed-to-manufacture-obstruction/#more-172933&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:House-oversight-parseltongue-1.jpg|right|300px|thumb|A &amp;quot;letter conveying a subpoena&amp;quot; is not a subpoena.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*Several years ago the architect of Obamacare, Jonathan Gruber, admitted on camera the Democrats who were assembling healthcare legislation were “relying upon the stupidity of the American voter”&lt;br /&gt;
:*Using the House Oversight Committee as the example (because that’s the one most cited and all of the letters are formatted identically), look at the language:&lt;br /&gt;
::*the phrase '''''“sent a letter conveying a subpoena“'''''&lt;br /&gt;
::*That statement is not the same as ‘sent a subpoena’; the term “subpoena” literally means “under penalty“.  A ''subpoena duces tecu'', requires you to produce documents.  In this example a congressional subpoena literally, and only, means: a request for the production of documents with a penalty for non-compliance.  &lt;br /&gt;
:*Pelosi does not want to engage the [[judicial branch]], nor does she want to give the target (President Trump) the opportunity to engage the judicial branch, ie. court.  The judiciary would likely upend her House committee “official impeachment inquiry” scheme, just as D.C. District Court Chief Judge Beryl Howell recently did to Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler for “gaming the system“.  Speaker Pelosi’s unilateral decree for an “official impeachment inquiry” without a House vote will not pass court review.&lt;br /&gt;
:*these are political subpoenas, demand letters as weapons;  constructed for optimal political value, and framed to create obstruction articles of impeachment.&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''This is a carefully constructed [[subversion]] of the constitutional processes and procedures.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:*The failure to comply with a non-official subpoena (essentially a letter); for documents relating to a fake “official impeachment inquiry” (Pelosi decree); that the House specifically never intends to enforce in any court (because they would fail); results in the House committee finding of “obstruction.” An enhancement for their impeachment articles.&lt;br /&gt;
:*See: '''[[Lawfare]]: [https://www.lawfareblog.com/watergate-road-map-and-coming-mueller-report The Watergate ‘Road Map’ and the Coming Mueller Report]''', September 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
:*In 2018 [The Conservative Treehouse] noted the significant House rule changes constructed by Nancy Pelosi for the 116th congress seemed specifically geared toward impeachment.  That impeachment plan was made at the same time as the “Lawfare Obstruction Roadmap” was drawn up.  With the framework of the current effort, those changed rules are now being used to subvert historic processes and construct the articles of impeachment.  Without a vote to initiate an impeachment inquiry, the articles of impeachment can now be drawn up in committee without any participation by the minority;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://saraacarter.com/impeachment-probe-schiff-plays-dirty-doesnt-allow-equal-participation-of-republicans-in-kurt-volker-testimony/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and without any input from the [[executive branch]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''6 October.''' John Ratcliffe Explains Why Pelosi’s “Impeachment Inquiry” is Being Run From House Intel Instead of House Judiciary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/06/finally-john-ratcliffe-explains-why-pelosis-impeachment-inquiry-is-being-run-from-house-intel-instead-of-house-judiciary/#more-172995&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Transcript of October 5, 2019 closed door ICIG shows collusion between ICIG and Chairman Schiff on whistleblower complaint;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Schiff should recuse and be put under oat as he himself is now a fact witness.&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Impeachment inquiry run behind closed doors by [[House Intel Committee]] rather the committee of jurisdiction, the House Judiciary Committee'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; https://videos.files.wordpress.com/CXPRpWpN/rep-john-ratcliffe-with-maria-bartiromo-ukraine-issues-10-6-19_dvd.mp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Pelosi is intentionally using non-jurisdictional committees because she is manipulating the process.  It’s the same reason why the House Intelligence, House Foreign Affairs and House Oversight committees cannot legally send out “Impeachment-based Subpoenas“; they have no impeachment jurisdiction.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The “impeachment” subpoenas’ are not technically subpoenas because the basis for the requests, impeachment, is not within the jurisdiction of either committee.  So the committees are sending out demand letters, calling them subpoenas''' (media complies with the narrative), and hoping the electorate do not catch on to the scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
*''Epoch Times:'' Intelligence Community Watchdog Interviews Second Whistleblower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/intelligence-community-watchdog-interviews-second-whistleblower_3107542.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Following Barr/Durham Trip To Italy, Angry Former Italian PM (And Obama Pal Matteo Renzi) Threatens To Sue George Papadopoulos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2019/10/06/following-barrdurham-trip-italy-former-italian-pm-obama-pal-threatens-sue-george-papadopoulos/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''7 October.''' ''Epoch Times:'' Media Narrative on ‘Spygate’ Figure Mifsud Shifts as Barr Investigates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/media-narrative-on-joseph-mifsud-shifts-as-barr-investigates_3107644.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Ryan Saavedra: Audio, Email Evidence Shows DNC Colluded With Ukraine To Boost Hillary By Harming Trump, Report Says.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/bombshell-audio-email-evidence-shows-dnc-colluded-with-ukraine-to-boost-hillary-by-harming-trump-report-says&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Lee Smith: It's Not All About the Bidens: Why Trump Has Ukraine on the Brain.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/07/not_all_about_the_bidens_why_trump_has_ukraine_on_the_brain_120635.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[James Clapper]]: Obama Ordered Us to Start the Witch Hunt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thegreggjarrett.com/james-clapper-obama-ordered-us-to-start-the-witch-hunt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*CTH: '''House Sends More Carefully Worded Impeachment Demand Letters (Not Subpoenas) – OMB and Pentagon.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/07/house-sends-more-carefully-worded-impeachment-demand-letters-not-subpoenas-omb-and-pentagon/#more-173039&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:House-letter-3.jpg|right|300px|thumb|The claim is fraudulent; (A) the House of Representatives has not voted on an impeachment inquiry; (B) the Committee on Oversight and Reform is not the committee of jurisdiction in an impeachment inquiry.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*Chairman Adam Schiff, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; Chairman [[Elijah E. Cummings]], Committee on White House Oversight; Chairman [[Eliot L. Engel]], House Committee on Foreign Affairs, continue sending carefully worded letters under the guise of ‘subpoenas’.&lt;br /&gt;
:*in these latest versions they are modifying: (#1) now they actually include attachments that would be “subpoenas”; yet they shift language to ‘subpoena schedules’.  Why?  Because (#2) the letters and subpoenas omit any penalty for non-compliance.  They cannot assign a penalty because the letters do not carry judicial authority.&lt;br /&gt;
:* a congressional committee must meet three requirements for their investigative subpoenas to be “legally sufficient” or have “judicial authority”; meaning a subpoena that carries a legal penalty for non-compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
::*'''First: “the committee’s investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber;'''&lt;br /&gt;
::*'''Second: “the investigation must pursue “a valid legislative purpose” but does not need to involve legislation and does not need to specify the ultimate intent of Congress;'''&lt;br /&gt;
::*'''Third: the specific inquiries must be pertinent to the subject matter area that has been authorized for investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''These “subpoenas” from the committees do not meet the first hurdle.  The “impeachment inquiry” was not authorized by its chamber.  The chamber for each committee is the full house of representatives.'''  [Again, there are constitutional processes within impeachment.]&lt;br /&gt;
::*KEY POINT – Remember, the Legislative committee intent is to pierce the constitutional firewall that creates a distinct [[separation of powers]]; and the Legislative branch is trying to force documents from the Executive branch, overriding [[executive privilege]]. This is a constitutional issue.&lt;br /&gt;
:*A demand letter only becomes a subpoena, technically meaning: ‘a request for the production of documents with a penalty for non-compliance’, when the committee has judicial authority.  Absent judicial authority, all of these “subpoenas” are simply “letters”.  &lt;br /&gt;
:*the letters are from Oversight, Intel and Foreign Affairs.  Those three committees are outside the jurisdiction of the committee that holds power to write articles of impeachment, the House Judiciary Committee (Chairman Jerry Nadler).  As lawyer Ristvan noted:&lt;br /&gt;
::*It is well established that the House has subpoena powers concerning legislative oversight. But that power is limited to matters concerning A1§8. Neither foreign policy (Ukraine call) nor impeachment have any nexus to A1§8. Such subpoenas do not abrogate executive privilege.&lt;br /&gt;
::*It is established ([[SCOTUS]] concerning [[Nixon]] impeachment investigation) that IF the House votes to have the Judiciary committee formally conduct an impeachment investigation, then that committee (only) has subpoena power, and that power CAN pierce thru executive privilege. No such vote has been taken.&lt;br /&gt;
:*In essence, Schiff, Cummings and Engel are on a non-constitutional, non-authorized (by chamber) partisan fishing expedition – given the label “official impeachment inquiry” via a non-constitutional unilateral decree by Speaker Nancy Pelosi.  Pelosi (Speaker), Schiff (Intel), Cummings (Oversight), and Engel (Foreign Affairs) are attempting to use non-jurisdictional committees (no authority within the impeachment process) to gain evidence to relay to the committee that would have impeachment authority, the House Judiciary Committee.  Presumably once their assembled information arrives at the Judiciary, Jerry Nadler’s Lawfare staff will write articles of impeachment.  This is the process they are following; however, this partisan approach completely cuts-out the rights of the minority (republicans) and the impeachment [[due process]] rights of the executive.  Pelosi appears to be waiting until all of the assembled evidence arrives at the Judiciary Committee before she will call for a full house vote to authorize the impeachment investigation.  Again, manipulating the process.  &lt;br /&gt;
:*In the interim, none of these demand letters carry any penalty for non-compliance because Pelosi’s crew doesn’t want to engage the court system.  In these latest letters they have retracted the ¹prior threats (example below) to use non-compliance as “evidence of obstruction” because it’s likely any “obstruction articles” would be easily challenged in court on the basis the underlying subpoena lacked judicial authority.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[Sundance added]: ''When it comes to political weaponization and political power constructs the [[Marxist]]s have exceptional work ethics; they will outwork anyone on the other side who opposes them. They are far, far, better at political strategy and scheme than conservative politicians. Part of the reason for their success is that crooks, cons and swindlers are far more cunning than honorable, virtuous and moral people. It is unfortunate, but true; and the same truth applies beyond politics.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[…] We are the normal people who don’t spend every moment of our day scheming, conniving, and developing plans to dismantle the lives of your freedom loving community and rebuild it as a collective society.  For these Marxists who are about to take power that’s all they do.   Every moment of their existence they spend thinking about how to gain power and dominate, 24/7/365  that’s all they do.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/11/08/what-we-can-expect-with-a-democrat-marxist-controlled-house-of-representatives/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sean Davis: Intel Community IG Stonewalling Congress On Backdated Whistleblower Rule Changes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/07/intel-community-ig-stonewalling-congress-on-backdated-whistleblower-rule-changes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Michael Atkinson, the inspector general for U.S. intelligence agencies, acknowledged that his office secretly changed key whistleblower forms and rules in September, but refused to explain to lawmakers why those changes were backdated to August.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''8 October.''' CTH: DNI Declassifies FISA Judge James Boasberg 2018 Ruling – FBI Conducted “Tens of Thousands” of Unauthorized NSA Database Queries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/08/dni-declassifies-fisa-judge-james-boasberg-2018-ruling-fbi-conducted-tens-of-thousands-of-unauthorized-nsa-database-queries/#more-173168&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/429354806/2018-FISC-Opinion-Judge-Boasberg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Judge Boasberg wrote his opinion in October 2018. Boasberg reviewed 2017 through March 2018. This cover the period from before the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller up to March 2018. The Mueller report is date March 2019 and contains this statement on Page 13:&lt;br /&gt;
::*''For more than the past year, the FBI also embedded personnel at the Office who did not work on the Special Counsel’s investigation, but whose purpose was to review the results of the investigation and to send—in writing—summaries of foreign intelligence and counterintelligence information to FBI HQ and FBI Field Offices.''&lt;br /&gt;
:*Judge Boasberg's opinion covers the period from Mueller's appointment, May 17, 2017 up to March 2018, and the period of the [[Trump Transition]] up up Mueller's appointment.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Epoch Times:'' FBI Violated Americans’ Rights by Improperly Searching Surveillance Database, Court Finds.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/fbi-violated-americans-rights-by-improperly-searching-surveillance-database-court-finds_3110587.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Mueller lied under oath.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/JakeBGibson/status/1181689666216611846?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Jerry Dunleavy: Senate report criticizes Obama FBI response to Russian interference on Twitter and Facebook.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate-report-criticizes-obama-fbi-response-to-russian-interference-on-twitter-and-facebook&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sens. Grassley, Graham, Lee, Cruz, Cornyn, Crapo, Tillis, Kennedy, and Blackburn ask the DOJ &amp;amp; FBI about the status of 4 criminal referrals made by the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the baseless claims made during the [[Kavanaugh hearings]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/08/grassley-asks-fbi-doj-for-updates-on-criminal-referrals-for-false-kavanaugh-accusers/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''White House response to unconstitutional alleged &amp;quot;impeachment inquiry&amp;quot;.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/429369558/White-House-Letter-Impeachment-Group&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''9 October.''' '''DOJ probing potentially serious allegations against Mueller.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_d5VQIUZFA&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''CTH: Rod Rosenstein “Unindicted Co-Conspirator”? – Durham Expands Timeline for Probe.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/09/rod-rosenstein-unindicted-co-conspirator-durham-expands-timeline-for-probe/#more-173217&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Durham is looking into the Mueller phase of the coup (early 2017); &lt;br /&gt;
::*Rosenstein lied to the White House when he took Mueller into the Oval Office on May 16th to interview the special counsel target.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Rod Rosenstein expanding the special counsel investigations. Rosenstein wrote three scope memos in total. &lt;br /&gt;
:::*The third memo specifically allowed Mueller to target Mike Flynn Jr. as a tool to get General Flynn to take a plea deal.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Rosenstein cooperated in the Mueller claim of Russian election activity through DOJ indictments of ridiculous Russian-related entities; none of which would ever be prosecuted – and almost all of which seemed constructed to promote the guise upon which the Special Counsel was launched.  &lt;br /&gt;
::'''*Rosenstein approved of the James Wolfe plea deal, burying the FISA leak and the involvement of senators within the SSCI in the overall coup effort.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::*Rosenstein was specifically in charge of authorizing or granting the aggregate activity of Mueller’s team; which would include the aggressive methods used by the DOJ and FBI evidenced by raids on Paul Manafort and SWAT deployment against Roger Stone (with CNN media to broadcast). &lt;br /&gt;
::*Rosenstein would have to sign-off on the $10,000 sting operation against George Papadopoulos at Dulles International Airport.  &lt;br /&gt;
::*Rosenstein also threatened President Trump not to declassify material in Sept. ’18 or he would face obstruction.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Bret Baier &amp;amp; Jake Gibson: Durham investigation into origins of 2016 Trump campaign surveillance expands its scope.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/durham-investigation-trump-campaign-surveillance-expanded-scope&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Catherine Herridge: Durham Update.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukmMTTpYRL4&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*''PJ Media:'' Democrats' Fear of Durham About to Reach Panic Level.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/democrats-fear-of-durham-about-to-reach-panic-level/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*[[Zerohedge]]: Time To Reassess CrowdStrike's Credibility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/political/time-reassess-crowdstrikes-credibility&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Attempted Coup Against President Trump Looks Like CIA Operation Led by John Brennan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOOtxabzgsM&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Comey FBI press spokesman [[Michael Kortan]] got bribes from CNN and ''New York Times'' during Clinton and Russia investigations and lied about it to investigators.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/07/exclusive-fbi-official-sports-tickets-cnn&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Devin Nunes’s lawsuit against [[Twitter]] moves forward.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/08/devin-nunes-lawsuit-against-twitter-could-turn-into-the-companys-worst-nightmare/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Federalist:'' Anti-Trump Whistleblower Attorney Worked Directly For James Clapper.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/09/anti-trump-whistleblower-attorney-worked-directly-for-james-clapper/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:House-oversight-perry-letter-subpoena.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Another day, another phoney subpoena.]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''10 October.''' ''Washington Examiner:'' Joe Biden worked with whistleblower when he was vice president, officials reveal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/joe-biden-worked-with-whistleblower-when-he-was-vice-president-officials-reveal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''The Federalist:'' '''Anti-Trump alleged &amp;quot;whistleblower&amp;quot; attorney threatened to use his clients’ intelligence capabilities to dox a random Twitter user who irritated him.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/10/anti-trump-whistleblower-attorney-threatened-to-dox-anonymous-twitter-account/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*CTH: Another Day, Another [[Phoney subpoena|Phony “Subpoena”]] Impeachment Narrative – [[Rick Perry]] Edition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/10/another-day-another-phony-subpoena-impeachment-narrative-rick-perry-edition/#more-173340&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*''WSJ:'' '''Game Over – Fake Whistleblower Lawyers Retreat From Testimonial Appearance.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-whistleblower-may-not-testify-in-person-11570738009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''12 October.''' CTH: '''FISA Judges Collyer and Boasberg Both Identified NSA Databases Used for Political Surveillance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/12/fisa-judges-collyer-and-boasberg-both-identified-nsa-databases-used-for-political-surveillance/#more-173475&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*investigating the dossier made the 2017 Mueller investigation an extension of a 2016 counterintelligence investigation and not a criminal investigation (later, those were spun off). By maintaining the counterintelligence process for Mueller, the FBI was able to continue exploiting the NSA database as a FISA(702) tool for their investigation.  The foreign actors played a key role in this process.  So long as the Mueller investigation was targeting foreign actors they could collect downstream evidence on the “702” (American persons) returns.&lt;br /&gt;
:*In essence, the “small group” was stretching the NSA database rules to conduct electronic warrantless searches and massive electronic surveillance on targets direct (“to/from”) and indirect (downstream).&lt;br /&gt;
:*using the database Mueller’s team could continue to exploit the FISA(702) process. They could gather material for their criminal cases through the NSA database and then transfer those results to their spun off prosecutions. That’s why the Steele Dossier was so important. The Dossier formed the basis to continue making the Mueller investigation a counterintelligence operation, Title-I. Without the Dossier creating the foreign construct, Mueller’s team would have had to follow Title-III.   They didn’t need to do too much actual investigation because: (a) they knew the Russian-collusion/conspiracy was false; and (2) they could just access the NSA database and pull all the material they needed.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller wanted the dossier included would be to maintain Mueller’s investigation as a counterintelligence operation. [An extension of Crossfire Hurricane] As a result, all previous FBI exploits using FISA(702) database searches would be authorized.  To get the Dossier moved from “political opposition research” into valid “investigative evidence” the FBI needed to find a way to get it into the investigation…. Hence, Carter Page and the FISA warrant became the unwitting target and vehicle to carry it.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Rosenstein authorized a counterintelligence operation (2nd scope) and simultaneously re-authorized the cover story, the Carter Page FISA renewal. The ramifications here are actually bigger than the original FISA database abuse. It means the Mueller group had secret ongoing background surveillance on all of their targets; and they did not need court authority (Title-III warrants) to get evidence. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Chuck Ross: Andrew McCabe said at a recent event that Christopher Steele told the FBI he could not vouch for all of the materials in the dossier, and the sourcing chain he used.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1182672430403325952?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/10/andrew-mccabe-crossfire-hurricane-trump-steele-dossier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/10/11/andrew-mccabe-interview-makes-stunning-admission/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*against the backdrop of [[Ambassador Yovanovitch]] in 2017 and 2018 “monitoring” American persons in/around her Ukraine interests; and considering all of these database search queries identified by Boasberg in 2017 and 2018 “incidentally” captured Americans; perhaps this explains how the Yovanovitch “monitoring” was taking place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/nzHUM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Lee Smith: Ukraine Ground Zero for Russia Collusion Hoax.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/10/12/ukraine_ground_zero_for_russia_collusion_hoax_141479.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''13 October.''' RAY McGOVERN: The New York Times’ Preemptive Reporting on James Comey.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2019/10/13/ray-mcgovern-the-new-york-times-preemptive-reporting-on-james-comey/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''14 October.''' Adam Mill: New FISA Court Opinion Reveals More Illegal FBI Spying On Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/14/new-fisa-court-opinion-reveals-more-illegal-fbi-spying-on-americans/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*the FBI*'' failed to keep adequate records, as required by law.&lt;br /&gt;
:*“Since April 2017, the government has reported a large number of FBI queries that were not reasonably likely to return foreign-intelligence intonation or evidence of crime. In a number of cases, a single improper decision or assessment resulted in the use of query terms corresponding to a large number of individuals, including U.S. persons.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*On December 1, 2017, an element of the FBI (name redacted) “also conducted over 6,800 queries using the Social Security Numbers of individuals.” &lt;br /&gt;
:* “The Court has not heard from the personnel who conducted those non-compliant queries and is not well positioned to assess what courses of action they would have taken if they had been obligated to state in writing why they thought the queries were justified.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*Judicial Watch Reveals Surveillance Targets Requested by U.S. Ambassador Yovanovitch and State Department – But Bigger Question is Missing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/14/judicial-watch-reveals-surveillance-targets-requested-by-u-s-ambassador-yovanovitch-and-state-department-but-bigger-question-is-missing/#more-173680&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, [[Marie Yovanovitch]], initiated a request for State Dept. officials to conduct surveillance on: [[Jack Posobiec]], [[Donald Trump Jr.]], [[Laura Ingraham]], [[Sean Hannity]], [[Michael McFaul]] (Obama’s ambassador to Russia), [[Dan Bongino]], [[Ryan Saavedra]], [[Rudy Giuliani]], [[Sebastian Gorka]], [[John Solomon]], [[Lou Dobbs]], [[Pamella Geller]] and [[Sara Carter]].&lt;br /&gt;
::*Yovanovitch reportedly ordered monitoring keyed to the following search terms: Biden, Giuliani, [[Soros]] and Yovanovitch. [[Judicial Watch]] (JW) has filed a [[Freedom of Information Act]] (FOIA) request with the [[State Department]] and will continue gathering facts from government sources.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Prior to being recalled as ambassador to Ukraine in the spring Yovanovitch reportedly created a list of individuals who were to be monitored via [[social media]] and other means. Ukraine embassy staff made the request to the [[Washington D.C.]] headquarters office of the department’s Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs.  Yovanovitch’s staff was informed that the request was [[illegal]] and the monitoring either ceased or was concealed via the State Department Global Engagement Center, which has looser restrictions on collecting information. JW reports:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“This is not an obscure rule, everyone in public diplomacy or public affairs knows they can’t make lists and monitor U.S. citizens unless there is a major national security reason,” according to a senior State Department official. If the illicit operation occurred, it seems to indicate a clear political bias against the president and his supporters.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Yovanovitch, a career diplomat who has also led American embassies in [[Kyrgyzstan]] and [[Armenia]], was appointed ambassador to Ukraine by Obama in 2016. She was recalled by the State Department in May [2019] and remains a State Department employee in Washington D.C.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mifsud phones.png|right|300px|thumb|Mifsud's 2 phones in DOJ possession were used as part of the efforts by western intelligence against Gen. Flynn &amp;quot;likely as early as 2014 to arrange . . . 'connections' with certain Russians&amp;quot;., referring to Stefan Halper's scheme frame Flynn over a causal meeting with a U.K. citizen named Svetlana Lokhova.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sean Davis: Democracy Dies In Darkness: Adam Schiff Just Banned A GOP Lawmaker From Attending Key [[Ukrainegate]] Deposition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/14/democracy-dies-in-darkness-adam-schiff-just-banned-a-gop-lawmaker-from-attending-key-ukrainegate-deposition/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*CTH: Rep Lee Zeldin Discusses Fiona Hill Testimony and Schiff’s Conspicuous Attempt to Drop the Whistleblower.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/14/judicial-watch-reveals-surveillance-targets-requested-by-u-s-ambassador-yovanovitch-and-state-department-but-bigger-question-is-missing/#more-173680&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Schiff is trying to sweep the whistleblower complaint under the rug.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Bartiromo: IG Report delayed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/MariaBartiromo/status/1183876488422219779&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/10/15/ig-horowitzs-report-delayed-due-to-intra-agency-food-fight-over-what-gets-redacted-839506&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''15 October.'''  DOJ Has Possession of Joseph Mifsud Cell Phones (Blackberries)?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/15/wait-what-doj-has-possession-of-joseph-mifsud-cell-phones-blackberries/#more-173778&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/430459068/Flynn-MTC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*The 2 phones were used by Mifsud as part of the efforts by western intelligence against him &amp;quot;likely as early as 2014 to arrange . . . 'connections' with certain Russians&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1184213839098736640&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*John Solomon: New evidence shows why Steele, the Ohrs and TSA workers never should have become DOJ sources.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/457628-new-evidence-shows-why-steele-the-ohrs-and-tsa-workers-never-should-have&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''16 October.''' ''Epoch Times:'' DOJ Obtained Cellphones of Central Figure at Origin of Russia Probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/doj-obtained-cell-phones-of-central-figure-at-origin-of-russia-probe_3118323.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Epoch Times:'' Carter Page’s Privacy Act Request Remains Unfulfilled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/with-ig-report-imminent-doj-has-yet-to-grant-carter-page-review-mandated-by-privacy-act_3118327.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''17 October.''' '''''Washington Times:'' AG Barr's special Russia investigator obtained BlackBerrys tied to launch of FBI Russia-Trump probe.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/oct/17/john-durham-ag-barrs-special-russia-investigator-o/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Margot Cleveland: Why It Matters That Sidney Powell Wants Data From Joseph Mifsud’s Smartphones.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/17/why-it-matters-that-sidney-powell-wants-data-from-joseph-mifsuds-smartphones/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''18 October.''' '''''Washington Examiner:'' State Department finds violations by 38 people in Clinton emails review.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/state-department-finds-violations-by-38-people-in-clinton-emails-review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*State Department identified nearly 600 security violations in its now-completed review of email records of dozens of former agency officials and aides to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.&lt;br /&gt;
:*The investigation, which covered the 33,000 emails Clinton provided for review, found 91 “valid violations” attributable to 38 individuals, some of whom may face disciplinary action. Another 497 violations could not be tied to any specific person.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Jeff Carlson: Mifsud’s Cell Phones Obtained by Durham Could Answer Key Russiagate Questions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/10/18/mifsuds-cell-phones-obtained-by-durham-could-answer-key-russiagate-questions/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Trump Campaign To Sue CNN For &amp;quot;Substantial Payment&amp;quot; After Project Veritas Undercover Exposé.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/michaelglassner/status/1185225081141772290&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-campaign-sue-cnn-substantial-payment-after-project-veritas-undercover-expose&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''19 October.''' Papadopoulos says game-changing Mifsud phones are about to link his case and Mike Flynn’s to treason/&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/10/19/papadopoulos-says-game-changing-mifsud-phones-are-about-to-link-his-case-and-mike-fynns-to-treason-841232&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mifsud wasn’t a Russian agent — he was allegedly a “western intelligence” asset who was purposefully used by the Obama administration in 2016 to target both Papadopoulos and then-fellow Trump campaign adviser retired [[Gen. Michael Flynn]].&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;quot;Mifsud was also spying on Michael Flynn just two months before he started his encounters with me.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*the contents of the phone prove that the [[Obama administration]] had begun spying on his client as early as 2014.&lt;br /&gt;
:*“I joined the Donald Trump campaign in March of 2016.  Before even ''The Washington Post'' or the American media knew that I was joining this campaign, I had Joseph Mifsud and other intelligence agencies knowing all about me, what I was doing and what Donald Trump’s campaign was all about. So the notion that this investigation, [[Crossfire Hurricane]], started spontaneously on July 31st, 2016 is absurd. It’s completely absurd.”&lt;br /&gt;
:*Officials in Italy, the U.K., and Australia all reportedly assisted the Obama administration in its “investigation” of Papadopoulos.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Laura Ingraham: “[Trump] represented an existential threat to the global world. They wanted to keep this whole racket going with globalism. And Trump was the skunk at that globalist picnic.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:*CTH: Reminder: John Durham Questioning CIA Officials About Intelligence Community Assessment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/19/reminder-john-durham-questioning-cia-officials-about-intelligence-community-assessment-2/#more-174107&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*the December 29th, 2016, Joint Analysis Report (JAR) on Russia Cyber Activity was a quickly compiled bunch of nonsense about Russian hacking. The JAR was followed a week later by the January 7th, 2017, Intelligence Community Assessment. &lt;br /&gt;
:*The ICA was the brain-trust of John Brennan, James Clapper and James Comey. While the majority of content was from the CIA, some of the content within the ICA was written by FBI Agent Peter Strzok.  NSA Director Mike Rogers refused to sign up to the “high confidence” claims.  All of the downstream claims about Russian activity, including the Russian indictments promoted by Rosenstein and the Mueller team, are centered around origination claims of illicit Russian activity outlined in the ICA.  Information available as of 29 December 2016 was used in the preparation of this product.&lt;br /&gt;
::*'''''&amp;quot;Scope:''' This report includes an analytic assessment drafted and coordinated among The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and The National Security Agency (NSA), which draws on intelligence information collected and disseminated by those three agencies. It covers the motivation and scope of Moscow’s intentions regarding US elections and Moscow’s use of cyber tools and media campaigns to influence US public opinion. The assessment focuses on activities aimed at the 2016 US presidential election and draws on our understanding of previous Russian influence operations. When we use the term “we” it refers to an assessment by all three agencies.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/doc/335885580&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''CTH: DOJ-FBI “Small Group” Promote Defense of Spygate Operations – Former FBI/DOJ Officials Nervous, Hiring Lawyers.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/19/doj-fbi-small-group-promote-defense-of-spygate-operations-former-fbi-doj-officials-nervous-hiring-lawyers/#more-174085&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The activity of the “small group” of coup plotters consists of three generalized subsidiary agencies: (1) DOJ/FBI, (2) CIA/ODNI, and (3) The State Department. Within each “small group faction” a years-long review of their narrative constructs shows the groups have specific and unique media outlets for their offensive (’16, ’17) and defensive (’18, ’19) propaganda efforts. The DOJ/FBI faction of the “small group” leaks to narrative engineers at the New York Times and NBC. The CIA/ODNI faction utilize the Washington Post and ABC; and •the State Dept. faction use CNN and CBS. Each faction uses the same reporters &amp;amp; pundits for their distribution. &lt;br /&gt;
::*The secondary media groups come in for support – reporting on the reporting; and then reporting on the reporting of the reporting… and so on. This process provides a concentric distribution effort to bolster the originating premise; all of the ideologically aligned reporters share information for the larger process of defending the prior activity and advancing a unified narrative. [&lt;br /&gt;
::*The first “small group” report is from NBC. Toplines:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The Durham investigation is more broad and therefore more troubling.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Durham is moving to interview current/former CIA and current/former Intelligence Community operatives.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The CIA and Intelligence Community operatives are hiring lawyers prior to speaking to Durham.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The Durham investigation appears again looking at the ICA (Intelligence Community Assessment); which again is the part of Small Group operation which constructed the ‘vast Russian conspiracy’ (election interference) narrative.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The Small Group is worried the investigation has now shifted into a possible criminal probe.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The Small Group members themselves have NOT been questioned. This is making them nervous; hence the reporting.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Barr and Durham visiting Italy, the U.K. and Australia to speak with Mifsud, Halper and Downer respectively is really making the Small Group nervous.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Here’s the key NBC paragraphs::&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Via NBC: &amp;quot;A review launched by Attorney General William Barr into the origins of the Russia investigation has expanded significantly amid concerns about whether the probe has any legal or factual basis, multiple current and former officials told NBC News.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;The prosecutor conducting the review, Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham, has expressed his intent to interview a number of current and former intelligence officials involved in examining Russia’s effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, including former CIA Director John Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper, Brennan told NBC News.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;Durham has also requested to talk to CIA analysts involved in the intelligence assessment of Russia’s activities, prompting some of them to hire lawyers, according to three former CIA officials familiar with the matter. And there is tension between the CIA and the Justice Department over what classified documents Durham can examine, two people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Durham is looking at who put together the December 2016, Joint Analysis Report (JAR); and the January 2017, Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA); essentially the originating documents that promoted the vast Russian conspiracy and set the cornerstone for a special counsel investigation therein.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''NBC: &amp;quot;If Durham is conducting a criminal investigation, it’s not clear what allegations of wrongdoing are being examined. The Justice Department has not detailed any, and a spokeswoman declined to comment for this story.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''“I don’t know what the legal basis for this is,” Brennan said, calling the probe “bizarre.”&lt;br /&gt;
:::*&amp;quot;Justice Department officials have said that Durham has found something significant, and that critics should be careful.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;Skeptics who have been trying to track Durham’s movements say he has yet to interview key figures, including former deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe, former FBI agent Peter Stzrok and former FBI general counsel James Baker.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[“skeptics”?  Who are they?  …and why are they “trying to track Durham’s movements”?]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;“Nobody who knows anything has been interviewed,” said a person in touch with those former officials.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[So the group is talking to themselves and using a third party to push their collective discussion into the media.  Important to note.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;A Western intelligence official familiar with what Durham has been asking of foreign officials says his inquiries track closely with the questions raised about the Russia investigation in right-wing media.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[So some entity in the intelligence community, likely outside the U.S. , is in contact with the small group and keeping them apprised of what Durham is doing?  Interesting. Pay attention to what NBC is admitting here… Corrupt officials, co-conspirators, within the intelligence apparatus are monitoring John Durham; relaying information back to their allies; who then talk among themselves and coordinate media leaks based on the information they are able to extract from the tracking.   That’s a big admission.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;The Senate intelligence committee examined the allegations about Downer, Mifsud and Halper, as part of its bipartisan investigation into the intelligence community’s assessment that Russia was responsible for attacking the 2016 election, and found nothing to substantiate any wrongdoing, a committee aide said. (read full article)&lt;br /&gt;
::*[Again, notice how the small group is utilizing the SSCI, and '''it is a committee aide within the SSCI that is leaking to NBC.  We already know the SSCI was completely compromised by the effort to remove President Trump from office.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/08/11/ag-bill-barrs-other-problem-the-2018-doj-and-fbi-coverup-to-protect-the-senate-intelligence-committee/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Part of that SSCI effort led to the discovery of SSCI Security Director James Wolfe leaking the FISA application to the media.  '''The SSCI was/is part of the coup/impeachment effort.''']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''CTH: New York Times Narrative Engineers Start Positioning DOJ/FBI “Small Group” Coup-Plotters as Victims of CIA and Intelligence Community Manipulation.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/19/new-york-times-narrative-engineers-start-positioning-doj-fbi-small-group-coup-plotters-as-victims-of-cia-and-intelligence-community-manipulation/#more-174112&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Content and distribution tells us this information is from the DOJ and FBI faction of the “Small Group“.  Not accidentally, and VERY importantly, this is the same faction under the microscope of Inspector General Michael Horowitz and his pending IG report.  Additionally, and again very importantly, the principles within the IG report have already had an opportunity to review the part of the upcoming report that highlights their conduct. So this New York Times reporting, from conversations with the DOJ and FBI small group participants, is coming out in advance of the IG report and with their review in mind.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Here’s the article:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':Federal prosecutors reviewing the origins of the Russia investigation have asked witnesses pointed questions about any anti-Trump bias among former F.B.I. officials who are frequent targets of President Trump and about the earliest steps they took in the Russia inquiry, according to former officials and other people familiar with the review.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[Note “prosecutors” is plural; more than one.  “prosecutors” also implies a shift from investigative review, to a likelihood of criminal conduct.  The media presentation of John Durham has gone from a single U.S. Attorney with a mandate from his boss, to a group of people, ‘prosecutors’, working with the U.S. Attorney.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':The prosecutors, led by John H. Durham, the United States attorney in Connecticut, have interviewed about two dozen former and current F.B.I. officials, the people said. Two former senior F.B.I. agents are assisting with the review, the people said.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[Two dozen former and current FBI officials questioned, but none of the individual within the small group have been questioned yet.  In addition to the prosecutors, Durham also has two FBI agents assisting.  Later in the article we discover a strong likelihood that one of those FBI agents is the leak source for the New York Times.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':The number of interviews shows that Mr. Durham’s review is further along than previously known. It has served as a political flash point since Attorney General William P. Barr revealed in the spring that he planned to scrutinize the beginnings of the Russia investigation, which Mr. Trump and his allies have attacked without evidence as a plot by law enforcement and intelligence officials to prevent him from winning the 2016 election.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':Mr. Durham has yet to interview all the F.B.I. officials who played key roles in opening the Russian investigation in the summer of 2016, the people familiar with the review said. He has not spoken with Peter Strzok, a former top counterintelligence official who opened the inquiry; the former director James B. Comey or his deputy, Andrew G. McCabe; or James A. Baker, then the bureau’s general counsel.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[So Mr. Durham has not questioned the “small group” participants. Ultimately this appears to be the reason for the nervousness now originating a defensive posture.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':Those omissions suggest Mr. Durham may be waiting until he has gathered all the facts before he asks to question the main decision makers in the Russia inquiry.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[Or it could be that those “main decision makers” are targets of the investigation.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':The president granted Mr. Barr sweeping powers for the review, though he did not open it as a criminal investigation. That means he gave Mr. Durham the power only to read materials the government had already gathered and to request voluntary interviews from witnesses, not to subpoena witnesses or documents. It is not clear whether the status of the review has changed.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[Why would Mr. Barr need to “subpoena” pre-existing documents he has been granted full presidential authority to review?  Methinks the New York Times engineer is conflating the power of a special counsel (prior investigation) with the power of a U.S. Attorney General who was granted full access to any/all classified information by an executive order from the President of the United States.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':Mr. Durham’s investigators appeared focused at one point on Mr. Strzok, said one former official who was interviewed. Mr. Strzok opened the Russia inquiry in late July 2016 after receiving information from the Australian government that the Russians had offered damaging information on Hillary Clinton to a Trump campaign adviser. Mr. Durham’s team has asked about the events surrounding the Australian tip, some of the people familiar with the review said.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':Mr. Durham’s team, including Nora R. Dannehy, a veteran prosecutor, has questioned witnesses about why Mr. Strzok both drafted and signed the paperwork opening the investigation, suggesting that was unusual for one person to take both steps. Mr. Strzok began the inquiry after consulting with F.B.I. leadership, former officials familiar with the episode said.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[“why” did FBI leadership allow Strzok to create, draft and open the investigation?  LOL, that’s actually a big tell.  Apparently Comey and McCabe were smart enough to keep their signatures off a political investigation.  It’s called plausible deniability.  Same purpose for James Comey keeping copious notes (diary) in his home safe.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':Mr. Durham has also questioned why Mr. Strzok opened the case on a weekend, again suggesting that the step might have been out of the ordinary. Former officials said that Mr. McCabe had directed Mr. Strzok to travel immediately to London to interview the two Australian diplomats who had learned about the Russians’ offer to help the Trump campaign and that he was trying to ensure he took the necessary administrative steps first.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[“Two” = Alexander Downer and Erika Thompson.   May 10, 2016, Papadopoulos meets Ambassador Downer at the Kensington Wine Rooms in London, England. MEDIA CLAIM: “Downer met with George Papadopoulos, where Papadopoulos — having been introduced through two intermediaries, Christian Cantor and Erika Thompson — mentioned that Russians had material on Hillary Clinton.”  Both Papadopoulos and Downer refute their May 10th meeting discussed Clinton emails.  Papadopoulos notes that Ambassador Downer is recording their conversation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/20/unofficial-channels-reconciling-muellers-strategically-worded-origin-of-operation-crossfire-hurricane/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':It is not clear how many people Mr. Durham’s team has interviewed outside of the F.B.I. His investigators have questioned officials in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence but apparently have yet to interview C.I.A. personnel, people familiar with the review said.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[So the leakers “people familiar” to the NYT are limited to knowledge inside the DOJ and FBI operational entities; just as we suspected.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;Many of the questions from Mr. Durham’s team overlapped with ones that the Justice Department inspector general, Michael E. Horowitz, has posed in his own look into aspects of the Russia inquiry, according to the people.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;Mr. Horowitz’s report, which is most likely to be made public in the coming weeks, is expected to criticize law enforcement officials’ actions in the Russia investigation. Mr. Horowitz’s findings could provide insights into why Mr. Barr thought that the Russia investigation needed to be examined.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[Well, there’s the motive for the current narrative engineering.  Horowitz’s report is coming out; small group participants will be criticized; and the justification for Barr and Durham to look at their behavior will be bolstered by IG Horowitz.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;In his review, Mr. Durham has asked witnesses about the role of Christopher Steele, a former intelligence official from Britain who was hired to research Mr. Trump’s ties to Russia by a firm that was in turn financed by Democrats. Law enforcement officials used some of the information Mr. Steele compiled into a now-infamous dossier to obtain a secret wiretap on a Trump campaign adviser, Carter Page, whom they suspected was an agent of Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[Interesting the NYT doesn’t write that Mr. Durham has interviewed Christopher Steele about his work on the dossier and his contact with the small group (he has).  One would think that would be an important notation in a paragraph about Mr. Steele, no?]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;Mr. Durham’s investigators asked why F.B.I. officials would use unsubstantiated or incorrect information in their application for a court order allowing the wiretap and seemed skeptical about why agents relied on Mr. Steele’s dossier.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'':The inspector general has also raised concerns that the F.B.I. inflated Mr. Steele’s value as an informant in order to obtain the wiretap on Mr. Page. Mr. Durham’s investigators have done the same, according to the people familiar with his review.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[Well, well, well, I answered my own question.  The NYT doesn’t want readers to know John Durham interviewed Steele, because the NYT is admitting the Steele information was “unsubstantiated”, “incorrect”, and the FBI “inflated” Mr. Steele to gain a political weapon.  Hmmm… methinks those exact words will be in the IG report; I digress.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;Mr. Horowitz has asked witnesses about an assessment of Mr. Steele that MI6, the British spy agency, provided to the F.B.I. after bureau officials received his dossier on Mr. Trump in September 2016. MI6 officials said Mr. Steele, a Russia expert, was honest and persistent but sometimes showed questionable judgment in pursuing targets that others viewed as a waste of time, two people familiar with the assessment said.&lt;br /&gt;
::*[That preceeding paragraph is just loaded with juicy stuff.  The NYT is sharing that MI6 told the FBI Steele was a sketchy fellow.  The NYT is positioning the dossier to the FBI in September 2016, but we know the dossier material was in Brennan’s briefing to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in August 2016…. So the NYT is positioning the FBI as a victim of bad intel from the dossier that was initiated by John Brennan. Very interesting.  Additionally, “two people familiar with the MI6 assessment” is confluent with two people who have read the IG report which will outline the MI6 assessment.  See how that works?]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;One former official said that in his interview with Mr. Durham’s team, he pushed back on the notion that law enforcement and intelligence officials had plotted to thwart Mr. Trump’s candidacy..&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;The former official said he was reassured by the presence of John C. Eckenrode, one of the former senior F.B.I. agents assisting Mr. Durham. Like Mr. Durham, who investigated C.I.A. torture of detainees overseas, Mr. Eckenrode is also familiar with high-stakes political inquiries.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''&amp;quot;He is probably best known for working with Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the former United States attorney who in 2003 was appointed to investigate the leak of the identity of an undercover C.I.A. officer, Valerie Plame, to a journalist.  “Jack is as straight a shooter as you can get in the F.B.I.,” Asha Rangappa, a former F.B.I. agent, said of Mr. Eckenrode, a friend. “It’s the first reassuring thing I’ve heard about this review.”  (Read Full Article)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/19/us/politics/durham-review-fbi-witnesses.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Oh good grief.  Asha “Comey is my Homey” Rangappa, likes one of Durham’s FBI investigators…. who also worked with corruptocrat [[Patrick Fitzgerald]], one of James Comey’s corrupt friends who is now Comey’s corrupt lawyer.  Given that some of these NYT leaks come from inside Durham’s team, it’s likely John Eckenrode is the source. The key takeaway from this NYT article is the beginning of the public defense narrative for the DOJ/FBI small group.  '''They are starting to position themselves as victims of false information delivered to them by the CIA and Intelligence Community.'' Apparently, this is the big picture defense they will use when the IG report drops. [''Ed note: Special thanks to Sundance''].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''20 October.''' '''Durham’s Trail Leading to SSCI – Ali Watkins Never Slept With James Wolfe – It Was a Cover Story.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/20/durhams-trail-leading-to-ssci-ali-watkins-never-slept-with-james-wolfe-it-was-a-cover-story/#more-174163&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*interesting quote from NBC: ''”Justice Department officials have said that Durham has found something significant, and that critics should be careful.”''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/ag-barr-expands-controversial-review-origin-russia-investigation-n1068971&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dan-jones-1.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Warner wanted covert contact with Christopher Steele. Adam Waldman tells Warner that FusionGPS's new paymaster, Dan Jones, is coming to see him.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*During the 2016 effort to weaponize the institutions of government against Donald Trump, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) was headed by Richard Burr and Dianne Feinstein.  After the 2016 election Senator Feinstein abdicated her vice-chair position to Senator Mark Warner, and Feinstein's lead staffer Dan Jones left the committee to continue paying Fusion-GPS (Glenn Simpson) for ongoing efforts toward the impeachment insurance policy angle.  The SSCI needed arms-length plausible deniability amid their 2017 operations to continue the removal effort (soft coup).  The trail for this plausible deniability first surfaces with Dan Jones appearing in the early 2017 text messages between Senator Warner and the liaison for Christopher Steele, lawyer and lobbyist Adam Waldman:&lt;br /&gt;
::*In those March 2017 text message you can see Senator Warner attempting to set up covert “no paper trail” communication with dossier author Christopher Steele. Adam Waldman represented Chris Steele and Steele’s employer, Oleg Deripaska.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Less than a month later you can see within the text messages that Christopher Steele is in direct contact with Dan Jones. “[Chris] said Dan Jones is coming to see you” etc.&lt;br /&gt;
::*'''Jones talking to Christopher Steele in April 2017 is critical to understanding what was going on after Trump won the election.'''&lt;br /&gt;
::*Jones raised $50 million from those who were behind the 2016 stop Trump effort, and the purpose was now the 2017 impeachment effort.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2018/04/27/confirmed-former-feinstein-staffer-hired-fusion-gps-christopher-steele/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As you can see from the texts, Jones was now talking in person (“coming to see you”) to SSCI Vice-Chair Mark Warner in April 2017.  '''The SSCI was heavily involved in the impeachment effort after the election.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://t.co/a6sqJRQdWi&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Secondary documentation of the connection between the DOJ, FBI, Fusion, and Dan Jones shows up in the FBI investigative 302 notes of Bruce Ohr, released by Judicial Watch. [Pay attention to the May 8th, 2017, interview – pg 18, 19 of pdf].  Bruce Ohr is telling the FBI investigator, likely Agent Joe Pientka, about Glenn Simpson and Dan Jones visiting Christopher Steele sometime after May 8, 2017, and they were in the process of “lawyering up”.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Via NBC: &amp;quot;Durham has expressed his intent to interview a number of current and former intelligence officials involved in examining Russia’s effort to interfere in the 2016 presidential election, including former CIA Director John Brennan and former director of national intelligence James Clapper, Brennan told NBC News.  Durham has also requested to talk to CIA analysts involved in the intelligence assessment of Russia’s activities, prompting some of them to hire lawyers, according to three former CIA officials familiar with the matter. And there is tension between the CIA and the Justice Department over what classified documents Durham can examine, two people familiar with the matter said.&lt;br /&gt;
::*'''If the ICA is a false political document, the entire narrative from the JAR and ICA is part of a big fraud.  Then the construct of the special counsel probe (the “originating” construct), was false.'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fbi-comey-and-senator-mark-warner.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Deep state coup plotters (left to right) Comey, Clapper, Brennan and Senate Intelligence Committee vice chair Mark Warner.]]&lt;br /&gt;
::*In early 2017 Adam Waldman and Dan Jones were facilitating a plausibly deniable information pipeline from Chris Steele to the SSCI and Senator Mark Warner.  At the same time DOJ official Bruce Ohr was facilitating a plausibly deniable information pipeline from Chris Steele to the FBI/DOJ small group. The purposes were the same, everyone needed assurances Steele would stand by the false narratives.  That’s the purpose behind the  “re-engagement” with Steele through Bruce Ohr.  That corrupt planning activity is what the some unknown DOJ and FBI officials are hiding behind the Bruce Ohr 302 redactions.&lt;br /&gt;
::*U.S. Attorney John Durham has interviewed Christopher Steele; so too has DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz.  It was AFTER those interviews with Christopher Steele when the IG report was delayed and reports started surfacing that Durham was adding additional resources, expanding his probe and retaining former FBI officials to assist.  It was after those interviews when Durham and Barr started taking the background material of Italy (Mifsud), Australia (Downer) and the U.K. (Halper) more seriously.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*''Per NBC: The Senate intelligence committee examined the allegations about Downer, Mifsud and Halper, as part of its bipartisan investigation into the intelligence community’s assessment that Russia was responsible for attacking the 2016 election, and found nothing to substantiate any wrongdoing, a committee aide said. &lt;br /&gt;
::*Again, notice how the small group is utilizing the SSCI, and it is a committee aide within the SSCI that is leaking to NBC.  The small group are pulling the Senate Intelligence Committee back into the picture.  That brings Dianne Feinstein, Mark Warner, Richard Burr, Daniel Jones, Adam Waldman and James Wolfe back in.  In 2018 the DOJ and FBI covered-up the corruption evident during the 2017 pre-Mueller effort.  The current position of the small group is to force the 2019 DOJ and FBI to do it again.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Warner-text-1.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Mark Warner entering the SCIF to read the Carter Page FISA warrant on March 17, 2017; it was leaked to reporter Ali Watkins by the SSCI director of security, James Wolfe, hours later on instructions from his Senate bosses, adding fuel to the media frenzy that Trump was a Russian asset.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Throughout the 2016 and 2017 effort, a part of one branch of the United States government, the U.S. Senate through the SSCI, was assisting the efforts of the DOJ and FBI against a candidate, president-elect and later United States President, Donald Trump.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*The 2017 time period covers Robert Mueller as Special Counsel, Jeff Sessions as AG, Rod Rosenstein as Deputy, Chris Wray replacing James Comey as FBI Director, and eventually David Bowditch replacing Andrew McCabe as Deputy.   For all of the important decision-making Jeff Sessions was cut-out by design.  For example, the person who made the decisions about SSCI Director James Wolfe’s prosecution was Rod Rosenstein.  As a result of a FOIA release in Mid December 2018,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-documents-reveal-obama-state-department-urgently-provided-classified-russiagate-documents-to-multiple-senators-immediately-ahead-of-trump-inauguration/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Judicial Watch revealed how the State Department was feeding “classified information” to multiple U.S. Senators on the Senate Intelligence Committee by the Obama administration immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration:  The documents reveal that among those receiving the classified documents were Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), Sen. [[Ben Cardin]] (D-MD), and Sen. [[Robert Corker]] (R-TN).  Judicial Watch obtained the documents through a June 2018 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the State Department after it failed to respond to a February 2018 request seeking records of the Obama State Department’s last-minute efforts to share classified information about Russia election interference issues with Democratic Senator Ben Cardin (''Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:18-cv-01381))''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-state-cardin-complaint-01381/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The documents reveal the Obama State Department urgently gathering classified Russia investigation information and disseminating it to members of Congress within hours of Donald Trump taking office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-documents-reveal-obama-state-department-urgently-provided-classified-russiagate-documents-to-multiple-senators-immediately-ahead-of-trump-inauguration/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The impeachment program was a plan, an insurance policy of sorts; a coordinated effort between corrupt politicians in the Senate and hold-over allies in the executive; the appointment of a special counsel was always the way they were going to hand-off and continue the investigation into Trump; the continued exploitation of the Steele Dossier was critical;&lt;br /&gt;
::*'''While Mark Warner of the SSCI in the Legislative branch was communicating with Adam Waldman and Dan Jones as a conduit to Chris Steele, the FBI/DOJ team in the Executive branch was communicating through Bruce Ohr to Chris Steele (and by extension to Nellie Ohr and Fusion GPS).'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wolfe-ssci-senators-asking-lieniency.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Wolfe threatened to bring down his SSCI bosses if they didn't come to his defense.]]&lt;br /&gt;
::*Warner’s role was to weaponize the Legislative branch to advance the ‘Russia conspiracy’ narrative, a fundamental necessity if a special counsel was to be justified.  The SSCI, and the security protocols within it, were part of the plan; hence the rapid information from the State Department to the SSCI in the closing days of the Obama administration.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*On March 17th, 2017, the Senate Intelligence Committee took custody of the Carter Page FISA application.  The FISA application (original and first renewal) was delivered to Senate Security Director James Wolfe.  &lt;br /&gt;
::::*Senator Mark Warner entered the basement SCIF shortly after 4:00pm on March 17, 2017, the day it was delivered. When SSCI Security Officer James Wolfe was indicted (unsealed June ’18), we can see the FBI investigators are describing the FISA application.  Additionally Wolfe exchanged 82 text messages with reporter Ali Watkins.  The FISA application is 83 pages with one blank page.  Despite the overwhelming (public) circumstantial evidence that Wolfe leaked the FISA application, he was never charged with leaking classified information.  Wolfe was only charged with lying three times to federal authorities, and he pled down to one count of lying to the FBI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*the Rosenstein DOJ not to charge Wolfe with the FISA leak was because that charge would ensnare Senators on the SSCI.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*the SSCI has intelligence oversight of the DOJ, DOJ-NSD, FBI and all associated counterintelligence operations. Additionally, when the FBI was investigating Wolfe for leaking classified documents, according to their court filings they had to inform the committee of the risk Wolfe represented.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*criminal '''charges for leaking classified intelligence information against James Wolfe would likely result in a major scandal where the SSCI itself was outlined as participants in the weaponization of government for political intents'''.  Thus, the alignment of interests for a dropped charge and DC cover-up. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*James Wolfe evidenced the schemes when he threatened to subpoena members of the SSCI as part of his defense.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/RTxJZ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''WSJ: Attorneys for James A. Wolfe sent letters to all 15 senators on the committee, notifying them that their testimony may be sought as part of Mr. Wolfe’s defense, according to two people familiar with the matter.&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''Mr. Wolfe’s defense lawyers are considering calling the senators as part of the proceedings for a variety of reasons, including as potential character witnesses and to rebut some of the allegations made by the government in the criminal complaint, these people say.  &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Doj-response-to-wolfe-defense-memo-3.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Smoking gun: The SSCI (Legislative branch) colluded in Deep State coup 1.0 by leaking the Carter Page FISA application based on the bogus ''Steele dossier'', whipping up anti-Russian hysteria.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Immediately after threatening to subpoena the SSCI (July 27, 2018), the DOJ (Rosenstein authorizing) cut a deal with Wolfe and dropped the charges down to a single charge of lying to investigators.  However, someone in the FBI who was doing the investigative legwork wasn’t happy with that decision.  The overwhelming circumstantial evidence that Wolfe leaked the FISA application went from strong suspicion to damn certain (after the plea deal) when the DOJ included a sentencing motion in mid-December 2018.  On December 15th, 2018 the DOJ filed a response to the Wolfe defense teams’ own sentencing memo,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/395775597/Wolfe-Case-DOJ-Response-to-Defense-Sentencing-Memo-pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  and within the DOJ response they included an exhibit (#13) written by the FBI [redacted] special agent in charge, which specifically says: '''''“because of the known disclosure of classified information, the FISA application”'''''… Thereby admitting, albeit post-plea agreement, that Wolfe did indeed leak the damn FISA:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*James Wolfe leaked the 83-page Carter Page FISA application on March 17, 2017.  It’s all documented with circumstantial and direct evidence; including the admissions from the FBI agent in charge.&lt;br /&gt;
::*'''During the 2016 and 2017 effort to weaponize the institutions of government against the outside candidacy of Donald Trump, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) was a participating entity.  Dianne Feinstein, Richard Burr, Mark Warner, Daniel Jones, and James Wolfe were all participants of varying degrees.'''  The small group within the DOJ and FBI, now being investigated by Bill Barr, John Durham and Michael Horowitz, are pushing the SSCI back into the spotlight in an effort to utilize all of the legislative branch participants as a shield. [''Ed note: Special thanks to Saundance.'']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mifsud’s Phones Obtained by Durham Have UK Sim Cards Tying Them to the UK — AND BACK TO JOHN BRENNAN.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/mifsuds-phones-obtained-by-durham-have-uk-sim-cards-tying-them-to-the-uk-and-back-to-john-brennan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;gt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/GregRubini/status/1185488369339551749?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Chuck Ross: British intelligence questioned Christopher Steele’s judgement in assessment given to the FBI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/20/mi6-fbi-christopher-steele-assessment/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Larry C. Johnson: FBI-DOJ Likely to Throw the CIA and Clapper Under the Bus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/mifsuds-phones-obtained-by-durham-have-uk-sim-cards-tying-them-to-the-uk-and-back-to-john-brennan/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Grassley-tweet-ig-report-fisa.jpg|right|300px|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
*'''21 October.''' [[Sen. Grassley]] sends ominous warning on the FISA abuse report.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Sundance'' notes neither Daniel Jones not have been identified as being questioned by either IG Michael Horowitz or U.S. Attorney John Durham.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/23/senator-grassley-tweets-warning-about-fisa-investigation-holds-unique-perspective-on-deep-state-motives-for-a-cover-up/#more-174439&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*After the election direct contact with Chris Steele, while the possibility of the evidence being exposed as political opposition research, was impossible.  This is why Bruce Ohr and Adam Waldman were used as intermediaries by the FBI and Mark Warner respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
:*SSCI Vice-Chairman Mark Warner was the allied member of the group in the legislative branch. Fusion-GPS was pushing the narrative through sources and contacts within mainstream news.  The FBI, DOJ and Intelligence Community were leaking to their allies in media to build upon the same narrative. Director James Comey was keeping notes of all interactions he was having with the target, President Trump. Multiple people and interests were all working on the same goal, diminish President Trump through the fraudulent auspices of the Russia-Collusion-Conspiracy investigation and narrative.  By March 2017 the need to push more Russia-conspiracy fuel into the media bloodstream was critical. On March 17th, 2017, Senator Mark Warner told SSCI Security Director James Wolfe to leak the content of the Carter Page FISA application (original and one renewal) to the media.   &lt;br /&gt;
:*The intentional leaking of the FISA application put Steele in a very stressful position; the FBI had used political opposition research to gain a FISA court warrant, the media was reporting on it, and Chris Steele’s intelligence reputation was part of the narrative.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Daniel Jones was in communication with Glenn Simpson at Fusion-GPS and Adam Waldman representing Christopher Steele.  Multiple left-wing entities had given Dan Jones $50,000,000 to pay Simpson and Steele to continue the effort and retain the false Russia collusion premise.  In essence, Dan Jones was the bag-man for the pay-offs.  Payments made to Simpson were used to keep fueling the media story, bolster reporting of the FBI investigation, and further build the Russia narrative.   All of this was predicated on Chris Steele maintaining the story that his dossier was an official intelligence product.  As a consequence Daniel Jones also paid Adam Waldman and Chris Steele for their ongoing support.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Throughout this period in 2017 Daniel Jones was the bag-man traveling between Glenn Simpson, Adam Waldman and his prior work contact on the SSCI, Senator Mark Warner.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Waldman and Deripaska.jpg |right|300px|thumb|Waldman with Putin buddy [[Oleg Deripaska]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48Kk7kobMQY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*After his arrest for leaking classified documents, Wolfe threatened to subpoena Senators on the Senate Intelligence Committee (July 27, 2018) for his defense.  Rosenstein quickly cut a deal with Wolfe and dropped the charges down to a single charge of lying to investigators. Following that DOJ cover-up, in August 2018, Grassley requested testimony from Adam Waldman surrounding his contacts and engagements with Christopher Steele, DOJ/FBI officials, and contacts with Mark Warner to undermine and remove President Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
::*From Adam Waldman and Dan Jones all of the connections with the dossier participants become visible.  Those middle-men connect to Glenn Simpson, Chris Steele, Bruce Ohr, Mark Warner and the FBI officials utilizing the ''Steele dossier'' in their political investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*In a response letter released August 17th, 2018, lawyers for Waldman told Sen. Grassley their client was “out of the country and not expected to return for several weeks.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/386518002/Waldman-Letter-to-Grassley-08-17-2018-Follow-Up#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Waldman’s wife Barbara Sturm posted an instagram picture August 22nd, 2018, showing them dining with friends in New York.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.instagram.com/p/Bm0ypvugtc9/?taken-by=bbsturm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/almostjingo/status/1032784910447071233&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''22 October.''' '''CIA Circles Wagons – Dispatches Media Narrative Engineers to Defend Interests.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/22/cia-circles-wagons-dispatches-media-narrative-engineers-to-defend-interests/#more-174333&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*CIA defending journalist Natasha Bertrand has been participating in the multi-year PR effort which helped frame the CIA/ODNI talking points against President Trump, and she is deployed again in the latest effort within Politico.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/22/trump-vengeance-john-brennan-russia-053970&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Bertrand is counting on people not knowing that John Brennan was caught lying about his instructions to CIA operatives to spy on the networks of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''CTH: Durham Looking At Brennan – A Reminder of “The Crown Material” Conflict.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/22/durham-looking-at-brennan-a-reminder-of-the-crown-material-conflict/#more-174350&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*In May 2019 Trey Gowdy stated there are emails from Comey that outline instructions from Brennan to include the “Crown Material,” i.e. the ''Steele dossier'', within the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment.&lt;br /&gt;
::{{Quotebox|…”Brennan is insisting the Crown Material be included in the intel assessment”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1PohFoeETF4&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
::*However, on May 23rd, 2017, in testimony -under oath- to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) Brennan stated [@01:54:28]:&lt;br /&gt;
::{{Quotebox|It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community Assessment that was done. Uh … it was not.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGg8gpGqr-w&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
::*Brennan may have set his own perjury trap.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQLweblVdoo&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA)  took the construct of the Join Analysis Report (JAR) on Russian attempted hacking of state election boards and the DNC and then overlaid a political narrative that Russia was trying to help Donald Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Warner tweet.PNG|right|300px|thumb|Warner scared to death about Barr poking around in the 2016 election.]]&lt;br /&gt;
::*OANN: Durham has requested an interview from John Brennan, and plans to request James Clapper also sit down with him as part of his review of the 2016 Russia collusion investigation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/BreakingNLive/status/1186733639960354817?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''23 October.''' ''Townhall:'' Did The FBI Give Trump And Hillary Different Counterintelligence Briefings in 2016?&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2019/10/23/did-the-fbi-give-trump-and-hillary-different-counterintelligence-briefings-in-2016-n2555206&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Catherine Herridge: Italian prime minister confirms Durham investigation meeting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://video.foxnews.com/v/6097127646001/#sp=show-clips&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/breaking-in-closed-door-meeting-italian-prime-minister-conte-denies-italian-connections-to-mifsud-whos-now-again-disappeared/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Durham and Barr recently had meetings in [[Rome]] where they obtained new evidence. The meetings “took place on Aug. 15 and Sept. 27, 2019, in Rome,” and that it was during one or both of these trips, that Barr and Durham “gathered new evidence.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''24 October.''' '''Report: U.S. Attorney Durham “Administrative Review” is now “A Criminal Investigation”.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/24/big-report-u-s-attorney-durham-administrative-review-is-now-a-criminal-investigation/#more-174520&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''NYT'' reports the Durham “review” has now officially moved into a full “criminal investigation”. &lt;br /&gt;
:*Jeff Carlson: Focus of Durham Probe Shifts to Senior Obama Officials.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://themarketswork.com/2019/10/24/focus-of-durham-probe-shifts-to-senior-obama-officials/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*One of the former FBI officials assisting Durham’s investigation is reported to be John C. Eckenrode, who at one time worked with Patrick J. Fitzgerald in the 2003 [[Valerie Plame]] leak case. Eckenrode reportedly knew Durham from his time as an FBI agent in Connecticut, where Durham was a prosecutor. Eckenrode also “ran the FBI’s office in Philadelphia” prior to his 2006 retirement from the bureau.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Sometime in mid-2016, Brennan formed an inter-agency task force headquartered at the CIA to investigate foreign intelligence allegations against the Trump campaign&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/did-brennan-admit-to-using-reverse-targeting-to-spy-on-the-trump-campaign_2628435.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*Brennan and some of his CIA analysts, along with DNI Clapper, were responsible for a series of three reports that were used to promote the Trump-Russia collusion story. The first report was released on Oct. 7, 2016, and the second on Dec. 29, 2016.  The third report, “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections”—also known as the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA)—was released on Jan. 6, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The ICA claimed that “Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump” and stated that “Putin and the Russian Government aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances when possible by discrediting Secretary Clinton and publicly contrasting her unfavorably to him.”  The report played a key role in advancing the now disproven allegation that Trump colluded with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'''While Brennan denied before Congress using the Steele Dossier in the ICA, he did attach a two-page summary of the dossier to the ICA that he, along with Clapper and Comey, delivered to then-President Barack Obama on Jan. 6, 2017.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/02/11/former_cia_director_john_brennan_investigated_for_perjury.html#!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/03/27/rand-paul-it-was-brennan-who-insisted-the-unverified-and-fake-steele-dossier-be-included-in-the-intelligence-report/comment-page-1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/themarketswork/status/1163951550718345217&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Brennan also made repeated use of questionable foreign intelligence and passed it along to the FBI.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/focus-in-spygate-scandal-shifts-to-cia-former-director-brennan_3049534.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Brennan testified to Congress in May 2017 that any information, specifically “anything involving the individuals involved in the Trump campaign was shared with the bureau [FBI].” Brennan also admitted that it was his intelligence that helped establish the FBI investigation:&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''“I was aware of intelligence and information about contacts between Russian officials and U.S. persons that raised concerns in my mind about whether or not those individuals were cooperating with the Russians, either in a witting or unwitting fashion, and it served as the basis for the FBI investigation to determine whether such collusion [or] cooperation occurred.”''&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Clapper personally confirmed foreign intelligence involvement during congressional testimony in May 2017:&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Sen. Dianne Feinstein: ''“Over the spring of 2016, multiple European allies passed on additional information to the United States about contacts between the Trump campaign and Russians. Is this accurate?”''&lt;br /&gt;
::::*James Clapper: ''“Yes, it is, and it’s also quite sensitive. The specifics are quite sensitive.”''&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Brennan appeared to have employed the use of “reverse targeting” on members of the Trump campaign. Reverse targeting refers to the targeting of a foreign individual with the intent of capturing data on a U.S. citizen. During an Aug. 17, 2018, interview with MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, Brennan said the following:&lt;br /&gt;
::::*''“We call it incidental collection in terms of CIA’s foreign intelligence collection authorities. Any time we would incidentally collect information on a U.S. person, we would hand that over to the FBI because they have the legal authority to do it. We would not pursue that type of investigative, you know, sort of leads. We would give it to the FBI. So, we were picking things up that was of great relevance to the FBI, and we wanted to make sure that they were there—so they could piece it together with whatever they were collecting domestically here.”''&lt;br /&gt;
::::*However, under the laws governing U.S. surveillance, the identities of U.S. citizens are supposed to be protected. Provisions known as minimization procedures are intended to protect information “incidentally collected” on U.S. citizens in the course of foreign surveillance. The collection described by Brennan doesn’t appear to have been incidental but rather targeted.&lt;br /&gt;
::::*As this foreign intelligence, unofficial in nature and outside of traditional channels, was gathered on members of the Trump campaign, Brennan began his process of feeding this intelligence to the FBI. Repeated transfers of foreign intelligence from the CIA director helped push the FBI toward establishing a formal counterintelligence investigation.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Durham has reportedly been in contact with Horowitz, whose investigation had “grown to include more than 2,800 subpoenas, nearly 500 search warrants, 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence and interviews of about 500 witnesses,” according to the ''Washington Examiner'' (September 19, 2019). &lt;br /&gt;
:*Horowitz Report: Likely No Classified Appendix / Review Phase Has Not Started.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/24/good-news-bad-news-horowitz-report-likely-no-classified-appendix-review-phase-has-not-started-long/#more-174506&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Chuck Ross: DOJ Has Quietly Been Publishing Documents Related To Trump-Russia Probe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/24/doj-trump-russia-records/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The agency in recent weeks has started publishing documents related to an array of topics, including Fusion GPS, Christopher Steele, Bruce Ohr, and Peter Strzok.&lt;br /&gt;
::*One document released Wednesday shows that former Trump lawyer John Dowd asked Rod Rosenstein to help investigate Fusion GPS.&lt;br /&gt;
::*DOJ published email correspondence between Peter Strzok, the FBI official who opened the Trump-Russia probe, and Bruce Ohr, a DOJ official who played a key role as middleman between the FBI and dossier author Christopher Steele.  DOJ published 140 pages of documents on its website related to Fusion GPS.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Dowd emailed Rosenstein and Scott Schools, the associate deputy attorney general, on Nov. 6, 2017, urging the pair to investigate whether Fusion GPS had paid journalists as part of the effort to attack Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Screen-Shot-2019-10-24-at-2.54.00-PM-620x421.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Email from Trump attorney Joohn Dowd to Rod Rosenstein, Nov. 9, 2017: “We all now know that the entire Russian drama was and is a complete concoction by the Clinton DNC buying a phony dossier with laundered money by law firms and cut outs with Fusion GPS and former WSJ reporter Glenn Simpson to nullify the results of the Presidential election....It is clear we were all duped including the DOJ and both houses of Congress.&amp;quot; Yet Rosenstein allowed the Mueller probe to continue another year and half, impacting the [[2018 Midterm elections]].]] &lt;br /&gt;
:::*“We all now know that the entire Russian drama was and is a complete concoction by the Clinton DNC buying a phony dossier with laundered money by law firms and cut outs with Fusion GPS and former WSJ reporter Glenn Simpson to nullify the results of the Presidential election,” wrote Dowd, who linked to a Washington Times article.  “It is clear we were all duped including the DOJ and both houses of Congress.”  Dowd asked why the Justice Department was not “intervening” in litigation to force Fusion GPS to disclose reporters that the firm allegedly had on its payroll.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*At that time, congressional invrestigators obtained Fusion GPS’s bank records that revealed the law firm for the DNC and Clinton campaign had paid the firm $1 million as part of its Trump investigation. Fusion GPS in turn paid Steele around $170,000, according to the documents. The records also showed that Fusion GPS paid journalists.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Dowd emailed Rosenstein again Nov. 9, 2017, with a link to a Wall Street Journal opinion piece entitled “Lifting the Steele Curtain,” which called the dossier “one of the dirtiest political tricks in U.S. history.”  Emails from December 2017 show Justice Department officials also appeared to lament revelations about Bruce Ohr’s links to Fusion GPS.  Ohr, who was a top official in the deputy attorney general’s office, was revealed earlier that month to have had extensive contact with Steele. Ohr’s wife, Nellie, was also reported to have worked as a contractor for Fusion GPS, raising allegations of a possible conflict of interest.  Justice Department officials circulated a Dec. 12, 2017, report from the Daily Caller News Foundation that Glenn Simpson, a co-founder of Fusion GPS, revealed in a court filing that his firm had employed Nellie Ohr. (RELATED: Fusion GPS Founder Confirms Hiring DOJ Official’s Wife).  “Oh good grief,” Stephen Boyd, the Justice Department’s liaison to Congress, wrote in an email to associates that linked to the DCNF’s piece.  “Lovely,” DOJ spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores wrote.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Among the trove of recently released documents is a Feb. 1, 2017, email exchange between Strzok and Ohr.  Ohr forwarded a top-secret Treasury Department report concerning banking transactions to Strzok through the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System (JWICS), a top-secret computer network used by various federal agencies.  Ohr obtained the document from Lisa Holtyn, a senior intelligence advisor at DOJ’s Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF). He provided Strzok with a password to access the document, which the government redacted because it involves information related to “monetary instrument transactions.”&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Ohr told lawmakers on Aug. 28, 2018, that he did not know Strzok prior to the beginning of the Trump-Russia investigation, which Strzok opened July 31, 2016. Ohr testified that he met Strzok only a couple of times during the probe. The FBI used Ohr to collect information from Steele regarding his investigation of the Trump campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The Justice Department also released a memo that Robert Mueller submitted to Attorney General William Barr on April 19, a day after a partially redacted version of the special counsel’s report had been made public. Mueller said in the memo that investigators had closed an investigation into whether an unidentified individual acted as an unregistered agent of a foreign country.  The name of the person is redacted, making it unclear who is being referenced in the previously unreleased document. “The Special Counsel’s investigation closed its investigation of [redacted] for acting as an unregistered agent of a foreign government … because there was not admissible evidence sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction,” Mueller wrote.  The memo stated Rosenstein authorized the investigation of the individual in an Aug. 2, 2017, document laying out the scope of the special counsel’s probe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*''PJ Media:'' Durham Investigation Is Criminal: a Disaster for the MSM.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/durham-investigation-going-criminal-a-disaster-for-the-msm/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*This is time to name the biggest miscreants: ''The New York Times'', ''The Washington Post'', ''The Wall Street Journal'' (front pages), the infantile ''BuzzFeed'', the risible CNN, ABC, CBS, and the multiple sexual molesters at NBC. These are the people who have informed us, actually assured us, from the outset that Donald Trump had done things that deserved impeachment when all they did was try to overthrow an American presidential election. All that time they were harboring the real targets of the investigation, the real criminals.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Now it is time to overthrow them. They no longer deserve their place in our society.&lt;br /&gt;
::*the networks deserve special opprobrium and scrutiny. They are granted licenses by the government, as it happens licenses to spew propaganda. Should these be continued?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''25 October.''' '''''Daily Caller:'' Michael Flynn Attorney Demands Charges Be Dismissed ‘For Outrageous Government Misconduct’.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2019/10/25/michael-flynn-attorney-demands-charges-be-dismissed-for-outrageous-government-misconduct/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sidney Powell asked a federal court to hold prosecutors in contempt for their conduct in the case against former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/431958737/Flynn-Filing-October-24th-Brady-Material-1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*(1) Lisa Page edited the Flynn 302’s, then forgot when questioned by DOJ officials, then re-remembered when shown her texts. &lt;br /&gt;
::*(2) The 302’s themselves were written with lies that do not match notes taken during the interview. &lt;br /&gt;
::*(3) The felony leaker of the Flynn-Kislyak phone call is Pentagon employee named James Baker (DOD). &lt;br /&gt;
::*(4) New texts from Page and Strzok that highlight the entrapment plan. &lt;br /&gt;
::*(5) ODNI James Clapper telling WaPo reporter [[David Ignatius]] to “take the kill shot on Flynn“. &lt;br /&gt;
::*(6) The purposeful use of Judge Contreras to take the December 1st 2017 plea agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
:*the government withheld evidence of misconduct in the FBI, including the infamous Peter Strzok-Lisa Page texts, until one day after he pleaded guilty in December 2017, and that contemporaneous notes from Flynn’s interview with Strzok contradict Strzok’s final report.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Four days after Trump’s inauguration, on Jan. 24, 2017, Strzok met with Flynn in what Flynn viewed as a meeting of two colleagues, but which Strzok was using as part of a criminal probe against him.  The government sat on explosive evidence about Strzok, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page and others in the bureau until the day after Flynn pleaded guilty.&lt;br /&gt;
::*“The day after Mr. Flynn’s plea, the press exploded with the news of Strzok and Page’s prolific text messages, their affair, and their malice toward President Trump,” Powell’s filing says. “The Inspector General issued a rare statement that he was investigating the entire matter.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*Bruce Ohr, the fourth highest-ranking member of DOJ, was demoted. Judge Contreras, who accepted Mr. Flynn’s plea only days before, was suddenly and inexplicably recused—only for it to be disclosed much later that he was a topic of conversation in the Strzok-Page texts because he was a friend of Agent Strzok. The relationship between Judge Rudy Contreras and Peter Strzok was never revealed to the court, or to the Flynn defense team prior to a plea agreement that was overseen by Judge Contreras.&lt;br /&gt;
::*''“Not only did [prosecutor Brandon Van Grack] not disclose a single text message before Mr. Flynn agreed to plead guilty, but Special Counsel apparently managed to control the press on the issue until the plea was entered on December 1, 2017, in Judge Contreras’s court.  It defies credulity to suggest that it was only unlucky for Mr. Flynn that the story broke the very next day.”&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brady-flynn-6-302-manipulation-for-charges.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Flynn's interview reports were modified to make claims that were never made in the interview.  The language was purposefully and willfully made to look like something is wasn’t; and in some cases they made it up completely counter to the actual statement given by Mike Flynn.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The basis for the false statements charge comes from an interview that was not audio recorded, even though anyone with a cell phone could have easily recorded it. Strzok did not take any written notes during the interview with Flynn, while a junior agent did. Strzok later wrote lengthy notes after the fact. Eventually, Strzok summarized the interview in a 302, the official FBI form in which an agent memorializes an interview, which became the evidence for false statements.  “Yet, their own notes contradict the 302, [and] fail to support it at all in other ways,” Powell wrote.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*“Notes by both agents state that Mr. Flynn does not remember making four to five calls to Ambassador Kislyak from the Dominican Republic, where he was on vacation, but that if he did so, it was because phone service was poor and he kept getting dropped.  The final 302 states the opposite: ‘Flynn remembered making four to five calls that day about this issue, but that the Dominican Republic was a difficult place to make a call as he kept having connectivity issues.'  This dramatically demonstrates the wrongheadedness of allowing a 302 to create a federal felony.”&lt;br /&gt;
:::*“Two out of four of the alleged false statements in the Statement of Offense are based on what the agents claim Mr. Flynn said or did not say about the response of the Russian Ambassador on two separate issues. … The notes provide no support for a question or an answer about the Russian Ambassador’s response—either to the UN vote or the sanctions.”&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Even how Strzok informed Flynn about the “nature” of the interview was misleading. Flynn was told investigators were seeking to learn “the nature of any links between any individuals associated with the campaign and Russia,” but he “asked no question related to election interference or coordination between the campaign and Russia.”  Instead, he asked what Flynn had discussed with the Russian ambassador on the issue of sanctions and a United Nations vote — when Strzok already knew exactly what he said because the conversation had been wiretapped.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*“The government is suppressing evidence of notes, reports, or recordings of the significant meeting the upper echelon of the FBI held to orchestrate the agents’ ambush of Mr. Flynn so as to keep him ‘relaxed,'” Powell wrote. “They purposely did not tell him they were investigating him and strategized at length to avoid raising any concerns. (‘Flynn was unguarded and clearly saw the FBI agents as allies.’)”&lt;br /&gt;
:::*“Since January 2017, the government knew, but still has not disclosed the full statements and notes that show Deputy Attorney General [[Sally Yates]] said the interview of Mr. Flynn was ‘problematic,’ and she was ‘unclear’ why the FBI was investigating or interviewing Mr. Flynn at all,” Flynn’s attorney continued. “Neither Mr. Flynn nor his former counsel had any of these documents or knowledge of the plethora of information discussed above when Mr. Flynn entered his plea.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*On Jan. 10, 2017, ''[[BuzzFeed]]'' published the dossier compiled by ex-British spy Christopher Steele, which alleged connections between Trump and Russia. The government also relied on the document to get a wiretap warrant on Trump associate Carter Page.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Brady-flynn-5-set-up-and-leaks.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Flynn was set up by felonious leaks as part of the &amp;quot;insurance policy&amp;quot; when Deep State coup 1.0 was put in motion.]]&lt;br /&gt;
::*The FBI leaked details of their investigation to the media and then strategized over how they could weaponize the media reports to conduct investigations.   Agent Peter Strzok and FBI Counterintelligence Director [[Bill Priestap]] discussed if this approach would work.  The prosecution then intentionally withheld the text messages from Flynn and the public, in their prior releases, showing Peter Strzok and Lisa Page discussing the Strzok &amp;amp; Priestap strategy sessions on using the leaks.   Those texts, clear Brady material, were purposefully hidden by the DOJ, until Sidney Powell went to find them on her own:&lt;br /&gt;
::*“A TON more out. . . We’re discussing whether, now that this is out, we can use it as a pretext to go interview some people,” Strzok texted. “In the next two weeks, there were ‘many meetings’ between Strzok and McCabe to discuss ‘whether to interview National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and if so, what interview strategies to use.’”&lt;br /&gt;
::*an unclassified letter written by the United Kingdom’s National Security Advisor, Sir Mark Lyall Grant, was hand delivered on Jan. 12, 2017 to the incoming national security team in New York, Powell wrote, noting that “[p]rotocol dictates that it was also provided to the then active national security advisor—[[Susan Rice]].  This was two weeks before the pretextual interview of Mr. Flynn, and it eviscerates the credibility of Christopher Steele whose false and unverified assertions mention Mr. Flynn and were used by the FBI to obtain illegal FISA warrants that likely reached the communications of Mr. Flynn,” the filing says.  Van Grack  “knows about this letter, and he questioned people about it,” it continues.&lt;br /&gt;
::*On Jan. 12, 2017, ''Washington Post'' columnist David Ignatius wrote that “According to a senior U.S. government official, Flynn phoned Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak several times on Dec. 29, the day the Obama administration announced the expulsion of 35 Russian officials as well as other measures in retaliation for the hacking.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*Pentagon official James Baker (DOD) &amp;quot;is believed to be the person who illegally leaked the transcript of Mr. Flynn’s calls to Ignatius,” Powell wrote. “The defense has requested the phone records of James Clapper to confirm his contacts with ''Washington Post'' reporter Ignatius—especially on January 10, 2017, when Clapper told Ignatius in words to the effect of ‘take the kill shot on Flynn.'”&lt;br /&gt;
::*[[Stefan Halper]] organized a February 2014 event at his college that Flynn attended while Halper was being paid by the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment. That event would later become the source of unfounded rumors that Flynn and a Cambridge academic, Svetlana Lokhova, had improper contacts.  “Flynn has requested the records of Col. [[James Baker (DOD)]] because he was Halper’s ‘handler’ in the Office of Net Assessment in the Pentagon, and ONA Director Baker regularly lunched with ''Washington Post'' Reporter David Ignatius.&amp;quot;.  She added that prosecutors have refused to allow Flynn’s defense team to see transcripts of the calls, even though media had them.&lt;br /&gt;
::*On Feb. 10, 2017, media reports citing “senior intelligence officials” said that Flynn discussed sanctions with the Russian ambassador, contrary to what Vice President [[Michael Pence]] had said on television.  “Overnight,” the 302 was edited to add “an unequivocal statement that ‘Flynn stated he did not'” ask the ambassador to slow down a UN vote or vote in a certain way, Powell wrote. “This is a deceptive manipulation because, as the notes of the agents show, Mr. Flynn was not even sure he had spoken to Russia/Kislyak on this issue. He had talked to dozens of countries.”&lt;br /&gt;
:::*“Second, they added: ‘or if KISLYAK described any Russian response to a request by FLYNN.’ That question and answer do not appear in the notes, yet it was made into a criminal offense. The typed version of the highly unusual ‘deliberative’ 302 by that date already included an entire section from whole cloth that also serves as a criminal charge in the Information and purported factual basis regarding ‘Russia’s response’ to any request by Flynn. The draft also shows that the agents moved a sentence to make it seem to be an answer to a question it was not.”  Prosecutors originally said that the 302 had been amended only to “remove a header” and then to remove the word “DRAFT.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The edited versions were withheld for months, and one only came out after prompting by Flynn’s attorneys. Prosecutors did not explain why they were not originally provided and “how they suddenly turned up” with “material differences.”  Prosecutors have still not produced the original 302.  “The original 302 is not ‘missing.’ If the government will not produce it, it could only have been deliberately destroyed, and this prosecution should be dismissed on that basis alone,” she wrote. “Neither the FBI nor its Sentinel system loses the most important of its reports that is supposed to support the federal felony of the President’s National Security Advisor. The only reason for it to be suppressed is that it is favorable to the defense.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*Powell says that prosecutors have resisted the requirement to turn evidence over to the defense at every turn, at one point even sending a link to a ''Daily Caller News Foundation'' reporter’s web page instead of turning over the official files.  “Van Grack ‘produced’ the first batch on March 13, 2018, by link to texts already released to the public by the Senate Judiciary Committee. He produced the second batch on June 24, 2018, by link to the ‘Scribd account’ of reporter Peter Hasson. Those cannot even be downloaded. And for his third production, it gave the defense two pages on October 4, 2018. These go precisely to the issue of McCabe’s Special Counsel Lisa Page editing the Flynn 302.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*In one case, prosecutors sat on records and produced them only when they realized the records were about to come out via other means, she wrote.  Other potentially exculpatory evidence is being withheld from Flynn’s defense team by saying it is classified, the filing says. “The government cannot conceal its wrongdoing behind a claim of classification.&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
::*“The FBI had no factual or legal basis for a criminal investigation, nor did they have a valid basis for a counter-intelligence investigation against an American citizen, and they all knew it. The evidence the defense requests will eviscerate any factual basis for the plea and reveal conduct so outrageous—if there is not enough already—to mandate dismissal of this prosecution for egregious government misconduct,” she wrote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Attorney Sidney Powell Calls out the DOJ in the Government's Case against General Flynn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppHzTXeA3tU&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Margot Cleveland: Sidney Powell Drops Bombshell Showing How The FBI Trapped Michael Flynn.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/25/sidney-powell-drops-bombshell-showing-how-the-fbi-trapped-michael-flynn/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*The sequence Powell lays out shows that a team of “high-ranking FBI officials orchestrated an ambush-interview of the new president’s National Security Advisor, not for the purpose of discovering any evidence of criminal activity—they already had tapes of all the relevant conversations about which they questioned Mr. Flynn—but for the purpose of trapping him into making statements they could allege as false.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*“on January 23 [2017], the day before the interview, the upper echelon of the FBI met to orchestrate it all. Deputy Director McCabe, General Counsel [[James Baker (DOJ)]], Lisa Page, Strzok, David Bowdich, [[Trish Anderson]], and Jen Boone strategized to talk with Mr. Flynn in such a way as to keep from alerting him from understanding that he was being interviewed in a criminal investigation of which he was the target.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*Next came “Comey’s direction to ‘screw it’ in contravention of longstanding DOJ protocols,” leading McCabe to personally call Flynn to schedule the interview. Yet none of Comey’s notes on the decision to interview Flynn were turned over to defense. &lt;br /&gt;
:::*Even Obama-holdover “Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates candidly opined that the interview ‘was problematic’ and ‘it was not always clear what the FBI was doing to investigate Flynn,” Powell stressed. Yet again, the prosecution did not turn over Yates’ notes, but only “disclosed a seven-line summary of Ms. Yates statement six months after Mr. Flynn’s plea.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*Following Strzok’s questioning of Flynn, he exchanged more texts with Page: “Describe the feeling, nervousness, excitement knowing we had just heard him denying it all. Knowing we’d have to pivot into asking. Puzzle round and round about it. Talk about the funny details. Remember what I said that made Andy laugh and ask if he really said that.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*The texts also confirmed Strzok did not believe Flynn thought he was lying: “Also have some faith in and my assessment. . . . I’m finding it hard to go out on a counterintuitive yet strongly felt ledge with so many competent voices expressing what I feel too: bullsh*t – that doesn’t make sense. [] I made some joke about what F said. Something patriotic or military.” Page responded: “It was clear that you both walked in and felt very strongly, so that obviously counts for something. [] You made a joke about a military band.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*A sealed statement from Strzok confirmed that the “agents did three briefings the day of the interview,” and that Strzok had reported that Flynn “had a sure demeanor, and he was telling the truth or believed he was—even though he did not remember it all.” This led the FBI and DOJ to then write “an internal memo dated January 30, 2017, exonerating Mr. Flynn of acting as an ‘agent of Russia’” and expressing no concern of a possible Logan Act violation.&lt;br /&gt;
::*“On February 10, 2017, the news broke—attributed to ‘senior intelligence officials’—that Mr. Flynn had discussed sanctions with Ambassador Kislyak, contrary to what Vice President Pence had said on television previously.” Following this leak, “overnight,” Flynn’s 302 was changed—and substantively so. “Those changes added an unequivocal statement that ‘FLYNN stated he did not’—in response to whether Mr. Flynn had asked Kislyak to vote in a certain manner or slow down the UN vote.”  &lt;br /&gt;
::*“This is a deceptive manipulation” Powell highlighted, “because, as the notes of the agents show, Mr. Flynn was not even sure he had spoken to Russia/Kislyak on this issue. He had talked to dozens of countries.” The overnight changes to the 302 also included the addition of a line, indicating Flynn had been question on whether “KISLYAK described any Russian response to a request by FLYNN.”  &lt;br /&gt;
::*But the agent’s notes do not include that question or answer, Powell stressed, yet it was later made into the criminal offense charges against Flynn. And “the draft also shows that the agents moved a sentence to make it seem to be an answer to a question it was not,” Powell added.&lt;br /&gt;
::*Then, the day after those changes were made, Strzok texted Page asking: “Also, is Andy good with F 302?” Page replied: “Launch f302.” Simultaneously, [[David Laufman]] in the National Security Division of DOJ, called Flynn’s law firm, Covington and Burling, to pressure them to file the [[FARA]] registration form for Flynn Intel Group. Those FARA registration forms would later be used to press Flynn to plead guilty.&lt;br /&gt;
::*The timeline continued to May 10 when McCabe opened an “obstruction” investigation into President Trump. That same day, Powell writes, “in an important but still wrongly redacted text, Strzok says: ‘We need to lock in [redacted]. In a formal chargeable way. Soon.’” Page replies: “I agree. I’ve been pushing and I’ll reemphasize with Bill [Priestap].”&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Powell argues that “both from the space of the redaction, its timing, and other events, the defense strongly suspects the redacted name is Flynn.” That timing includes Robert Mueller’s appointment as special counsel on May 17, and then the reentering of Flynn’s 302 on May 31, 2017, “for Special Counsel Mueller to use.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*That final Flynn 302 shows yet another inconsistency from the notes turned over to Powell. Both agents’ notes state: “Flynn does not remember making four to five calls to Ambassador Kislyak from the Dominican Republic, where he was on vacation, but that if he did so, it was because phone service was poor and he kept getting dropped. ‘I don’t remember making 4-5 calls. If I did lousy place to call.’” Yet, Powell stressed, the final 302 stated the opposite: “Flynn remembered making four to five calls that day about this issue, but that the Dominican Republic was a difficult place to make a call as he kept having connectivity issues.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*Powell pieced together this timeline and this disturbing evidence of a government out to destroy a man only after Flynn pleaded guilty and without benefit of the exculpatory evidence the prosecution was required to provide. And that’s a problem, Powell argues: “Neither Mr. Flynn nor his former counsel had any of these documents or knowledge of the plethora of information discussed above when Mr. Flynn entered his plea.”&lt;br /&gt;
::*&amp;quot;Mr. Flynn will ask this Court to dismiss the entire prosecution based on the outrageous and un-American conduct of law enforcement officials and the subsequent failure of the prosecution to disclose this evidence— which it had in its possession all along—either in a timely fashion or at all.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Doc drop alleges 302 form ‘edited’ to frame Gen Flynn, key ‘deep state’ actors implicated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/10/25/doc-drop-alleges-302-form-falsified-to-frame-gen-flynn-key-deep-state-actors-implicated-843708&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''Powell on Comey, Clapper, and Brennan:'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXseNmo94BY&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|''&amp;quot;I believe the Department of Justice is withholding a lot of information. As is Mr. Clapper and Mr. Brennan. And all of the people who participated in the complete setup of General Michael Flynn. You know we have found additional text messages that the government suppressed, including one where Agent Strzok indicates he knows it's a pretext to go interview General Flynn. They knew there was no Logan Act violation. '''They exonerated him [Flynn] completely of being an agent of Russia by the end of January [2017] and yet Mr. Comey still runs to the [[White House]] on February 14th [2017] and conjures up the entire [[obstruction of justice]] narrative against the president when Flynn had been cleared of everything long before that.&amp;quot;'''''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Comey memo February 14, 2018; “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.” https://clintonfoundationtimeline.com/february-14-2017-comeys-statement-for-the-record-on-his-oval-office-meeting-with-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Fox News:'' GOP reveals new Strzok texts concerning 'crescendo of leaks,' demands watchdog investigate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/republicans-intelligence-community-watchdog-leaks-silence-chuck-grassley&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Mueller Tried to Tie Trump Team to Russia – And SIX OF EIGHT Events Were Deep State “Set Ups”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/confirmed-robert-mueller-tried-to-tie-trump-team-to-russia-and-six-of-eight-events-were-deep-state-set-ups/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::*the pitch to “collude” with the Russian Government or Putin originated with FBI informants, MI-6 assets or people paid by Fusion GPS, not Trump or his people. There is not a single instance where Donald Trump or any member of his campaign team initiated contact with the Russians for the purpose of gaining derogatory information on Hillary or obtaining support to boost the Trump campaign. Not one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*'''McCabe turns down plea deal,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/MarieNoel45/status/1187870092526313472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; drops wrongful termination suit.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/gatewaypundit/status/1187903251645157376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''28 October.''' Lee Smith: How The Obama Administration Set In Motion Democrats’ Coup Against Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/28/how-the-obama-administration-set-in-motion-democrats-coup-against-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:* diGenova Discusses the Continued Impeachment Push.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fORVzu5Q6PA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''29 October.''' ''American Thought Leaders:'' Devin Nunes: Spygate is Greatest Political Scandal in Modern US History—&amp;amp; He’s Still Investigating.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIsyY42NJPg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''Epoch Times&amp;quot;'' Leaks of Trump’s Calls With Foreign Leaders Were Intelligence Products: Devin Nunes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/leaks-of-trumps-calls-with-foreign-leaders-were-intelligence-products-devin-nunes-says_3130740.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Sydney Powell on why the DOJ should dismiss the case against Michael Flynn.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/LouDobbs/status/1189332353610588161&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Hoft: Comey Likely Doctored His Memos In Effort to Take Down President Trump and the US Senate May Have the Evidence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/breaking-exclusive-fired-fbi-director-comey-likely-doctored-his-memos-in-effort-to-take-down-president-trump-and-the-us-senate-may-have-the-evidence/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Grassley Seeking Identity of Hillary Clinton State Department Staffers Who “Deliberately” Transmitted Classified Information Via Private Email.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/grassley-seeking-identity-of-hillary-clinton-state-department-staffers-who-deliberately-transmitted-classified-information-via-private-email-video/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''30 October.'''  ''Free Beacon:'' Trump Admin Launches Investigation Into ‘Deep State’ Targeting Top Trump Iran Official.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/national-security/exclusive-state-dept-launches-investigation-of-deep-state-targeting-top-trump-iran-official/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of names in the Obamagate scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James Wolfe indictment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Spygate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mueller show trials]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://thespygateproject.org/ The Spygate Project]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Deep State}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Scandals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax]][[Category:Obama Administration]][[Category:Barack Hussein Obama]][[Category:Hillary Clinton]][[Category:Clinton Scandals]][[Category:2010s]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Steven_Levitt&amp;diff=1589179</id>
		<title>Steven Levitt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Steven_Levitt&amp;diff=1589179"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:44:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Added link to the birth date&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Steven Levitt''' (born May 29, 1967 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Levitt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) is an [[American]] [[liberal]] economist and co-author of ''[[Freakonomics]]'', a book falsely claiming legalized [[abortion]] contributed to a drop in the crime rate in the 1990s (a phenomenon accurately attributed to [[conservative]] social policies). Levitt's theory has been compared to [[Eugenics]].{{who says}}  He supports the privatization of prison labor and online gambling, opposes teachers' unions, and denies climate change.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://shameproject.com/profile/steven-d-levitt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was born May 29, 1967, attended St. Paul University and graduated from Harvard University with a B.A. in economics in 1989, and received a Ph.D. from the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/steven-levitt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Levitt, Steven}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Jews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Jewish Authors]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;diff=1589178</id>
		<title>User talk:1990'sguy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;diff=1589178"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:41:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: /* Fred Schiele */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for adding your edits, hopefully you'll become a regular contributor.  If I can help you out with anything let me know.  [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 19:45, 27 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:49, 27 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Account promoted to skip the Captcha requirement.  Thanks for your enlightening edits to [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 19:37, 28 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:45, 28 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations and welcome.  You should be aware that people who edit at both CP and WP with the same user name are sometimes harrassed at WP as a result. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 00:11, 29 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for the welcome and thanks for the heads up! I've already received some heat on Wikipedia for taking some unpopular positions and opposing the bias there, so it will be nothing new for me. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:36, 29 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I saw your helpful addition to the article on Murder of Seth Rich, so I thought I would visit your talk page. How long have you lasted on the WickedPedia? I would be surprised that you would last long there, as I have found the WickedPedia incredibly intolerant and censorious, a pseudo-aristocracy with dominating bullies, biased enough for me to consider it a candidate for the Big T award (T in the Calvinist TULIP); i.e, total depravity! LOL I don't think you can do much on Wikipedia without being part of a group of old boys or buddies who work together.  ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 19:26, 23 August 2016 (EDT))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did you mean my Wikipedia talk page? I have been editing Wikipedia for almost three years already. A big reason why I've lasted so long there is because many of the topics I edit are not particularly controversial. However, you are completely right in your description of Wikipedia. I have seen firsthand the massive (and very visible) intolerance and bias Wikipedia has against conservatives, Christians, and anything that contradicts secular and humanistic (pseudo)&amp;quot;scientific knowledge&amp;quot;. I could probably write a book about all my criticisms of Wikipedia. I have been able to do some good work (I was able to bring the article &amp;quot;Electoral history of Ronald Reagan&amp;quot; to official &amp;quot;Good Article&amp;quot; status, and I created a few articles), but on other articles, like the Murder of Seth Rich, we cannot have much confidence on the quality and neutrality of those articles. I do applaud you, Thunkful2, for your excellent work on &amp;quot;Murder of Seth Rich&amp;quot;. It's awesome that at least one person can accurately present this story! :) --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:35, 23 August 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I meant right here, this talk page -- I visited it after seeing your good edit.  No, I haven't gone to your talk page on the WickedPedia.  Thanks for the complement.  ([[User:Thunkful2|Thunkful2]] ([[User talk:Thunkful2|talk]]) 10:45, 24 August 2016 (EDT))&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, got it. And thanks for your complement. :) --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:50, 24 August 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References from Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it's not really plagiarism to copy a reference from WP, it just want to point out that you probably shouldn't do so unless you have read that source, and believe that it supports what is being said.  If you are reading the books you are referencing, that's fine--I just can't tell. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:33, 8 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, that's a good point. I actually did not read those books, I just wanted to cite something so I wouldn't be adding unsourced info to the article. Should I remove those references anyway? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:36, 8 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is a good idea to find references to support unsourced statements, but it is a little deceptive to cite something you haven't read.  To be entirely beyond reproach, removal probably would be best.  At this point though, I honestly don't know if I'd bother.  In my opinion, it's up to you.  No one else has said anything, so it might be okay to leave them, I'm just not sure. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:51, 8 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::OK. I will do my own research and find other sources that I can use instead. However, it's getting late, so I will deal with that tomorrow. Thanks for your help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:58, 8 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Account promoted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your account has been promoted to include blocking and overnight editing capability.  Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:30, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Congratulations! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:57, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well done!  [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] ([[User talk:AlanE|talk]]) 01:06, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks all! I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:21, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Excellent!  you did good keeping an eye on that vandal yesterday. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 14:52, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks, Progressingamerica, I appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:42, 29 September 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reading the WSJ==&lt;br /&gt;
Re: [[Christoph Blocher]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typically, when I want to read a WSJ article that requires subscriber sign in is to Google the headline and access the web page from a search engine instead of directly.  Most of the time this requires a clean browser tab, sometimes it needs to be done in a different browser.  Rarely, it requires a cookie clearing.  Just thought that information may be of help.  This even works with articles that are years old.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a last resort, see if its in the internet archive.(though, most articles I don't want that bad to keep trying)  But they're all good procedures to know.  Sometimes works for other news sites too, besides WSJ. [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 00:00, 10 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the tip! That's what I will do. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:32, 10 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Account promoted ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your account has been promoted to include upload and rollback features.  Congratulations!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:26, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:36, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations! Keep it up! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:31, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks David! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:43, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Move and unlock requests ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can post your move and unlock requests to [[User talk:Karajou]]. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 22:30, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the tip! It's getting late, so I will do that tomorrow. I appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:37, 13 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::You don't actually need any privileges to do a move. You can cut-and-paste from one lemma to another. For purposes of copyright law, the edit summaries must make it clear where the incoming material comes from. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 00:54, 14 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Karajou blocked a user who expressed views supporting the Presidential candidate who is not a sexual preditor. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People should not be judged in race on alleged sexuality. A proper critique of Karajou would be asking him about blocking a user who expressed views supporting the Presidential candidate who is not a sexual preditor.--[[User:Rodgerr|Rodgerr]] ([[User talk:Rodgerr|talk]]) 19:04, 14 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you think you have been judged unfairly, you could have just emailed Karajou or webmaster@conservapedia.com (see [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Member Accounts]]). However, more than once, you decided to take the low route, calling him filthy, immature words [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Karajou&amp;amp;diff=1283494&amp;amp;oldid=1283491]. See [[Conservapedia:Avoid personal remarks]]. And why in the world did you do this? [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Coal_burning&amp;amp;curid=140922&amp;amp;diff=1283484&amp;amp;oldid=1283423] (for someone who apparently abhors Trump for the tape, your words seem just as bad) That, honestly, is shameful. I will note that the &amp;quot;Bringreaganback&amp;quot; account clearly violated [[Conservapedia:90/10 rule]]. Considering all this, it's quite clear you deserved the block. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:12, 14 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mainpageleft ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to your good question about entries on [[Template:Mainpageleft|Mainpageleft]], currently there are about 112 featured entries there, which are &amp;quot;reshuffled&amp;quot; periodically.  Do you have any suggestions about how that &amp;quot;team&amp;quot; of entries be improved, with respect to insight, influence, popularity, interest level, educational value, etc.?  It's a terrific mix of topics now but there is always room for improvement, particularly as the issues and interest in certain topics by the public inevitably shifts over time.  Thanks much for any suggestions you may have.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:46, 18 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An example:  &amp;quot;[[Underrated Sports Stars]]&amp;quot; is a solid entry, but should probably be replaced on [[Template:Mainpageleft|Mainpageleft]].  Do you have any favored, influential, insightful, potentially or already popular entry that you like, which you would recommend to replace it?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 12:55, 18 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I do have a few suggestions. [[Murder of Seth Rich]] is probably the best suggestion, as it is very detailed and well sourced. Also, the Wikipedia article of the murder has been the victim of leftist bias (two times, within a month, editors have tried to delete the article, and with that failing, the article appears to have been stripped of much detail) which our article covers well. Other suggestions that I have are the [[Ark Encounter]] (a popular and influential attraction, and one that has been the victim of atheist and evolutionary bias, which the article covers), and [[Larry McDonald]] (a true patriot who stayed true to his principles, and his article actually covers the theories on his possible survival). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:22, 18 October 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Account promoted again == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations, your account has been promoted again, so that you can edit protected articles, and protect and unprotect articles.  Very well done!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:05, 10 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow! Thank you very much, Mr. Schlafly! I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:19, 10 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations!  I've had some problems with the &amp;quot;protect&amp;quot; privilege, but I hope it works for you! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:35, 12 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks! I hope so too! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:15, 12 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Congratulations on yet another promotion. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:46, 12 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:46, 12 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Can't edit article==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi again, 1990'sguy, it's Ambassador. Is there any reason I can't edit the article on the [[Big Bang]]? To keep atheists from changing it, I suppose. If you have access to it, you might want to add the point about the Big Bang, due to planets and moons spinning backwards, contradicting the law of Conservation of angular momentum. Find out about it [http://www.creationwiki.org/Three_planets_and_several_moons_revolve_backwards_(Talk.Origins) here]. Thanks! [[User:Ambassador|Ambassador]] ([[User talk:Ambassador|talk]]) 19:56, 22 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, the article is protected probably because of atheist/secularist/liberal vandalism. Unfortunately, I cannot edit it myself as I do not have full admin capabilities. I recommend asking an admin ([http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:ListUsers&amp;amp;username=&amp;amp;group=sysop&amp;amp;limit=100 list]) to unlock the article or add the information you want added. Or, you can go to [[Talk:Main Page|the main talk page]] and add your request there, where more people can see it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:08, 22 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello there, and thank you for editing the article on [[Islam and Christianity]]. --[[User:SWAJCAHL&amp;amp;#38;S|SWAJCAHL&amp;amp;#38;S]] ([[User talk:SWAJCAHL&amp;amp;#38;S|talk]]) 09:13, 23 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:No problem, and thank you for creating it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:14, 23 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And also thank you, for your help - and tips! - on [[Jared Kushner]]. I'll try to remember the ref's and cat's in the future. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] ([[User talk:Ed Poor|talk]]) 21:49, 23 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sounds great and you're welcome! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:05, 23 November 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Geocentric page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I added a bit on the talk page a while ago. [[User:PeterIceHockey|PeterIceHockey]] ([[User talk:PeterIceHockey|talk]]) 17:15, 3 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you mean on the section &amp;quot;Ptolemy's view of a stationary earth&amp;quot;? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:13, 3 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry for the late reply but yes. It doesn't seemed to have created a new heading so I will add that now. [[User:PeterIceHockey|PeterIceHockey]] ([[User talk:PeterIceHockey|talk]]) 17:11, 5 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I removed it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:21, 5 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This is a simple misunderstanding. Please be reasonable. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is [[User:Amorrow]]. I had to dirty myself by creating a sockpuppet because you cut off every last channel of communication. The issues:&lt;br /&gt;
# SSN of dead people are release by the government of the USA. I made it clear that my father is dead. His name was William Knight Morrow. You can find his name and SSN, for instance, at [http://sortedbybirthdate.com/pages/19311104.html this page]. It is public, not private.&lt;br /&gt;
# You could have removed that link and let it go at that. I do not require notification of such actions. I do not care about that link very much. I put it there simply as a convenience.&lt;br /&gt;
Is the matter resolved? If so, then please unblock me or let me know here what remains unresolved.--[[User:Amorrow2|Amorrow2]] ([[User talk:Amorrow2|talk]]) 20:44, 3 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am discussing the issue on [[User talk:DavidB4]]. You are welcome to join in. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:48, 3 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::You are unblocked. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:46, 3 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello um 1990sguy Im not a spammer or troll I just want to edit this page so I can mod the Alexa device to read out conservapedia instead of wickedpedia.&lt;br /&gt;
:First off, you need talk page permission if you're going to make massive changes on one of CP's most important articles. I re-inserted some of your edits, but you need talk page permission to go further and change the article's very tone and point of view. Second, are you a sock of Amorrow? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:58, 8 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I am almost certainly not apart of this sock of amorrow, what is an Amorrow anyway 1990s?--[[User:Reevestehsnek|Reevestehsnek]] ([[User talk:Reevestehsnek|talk]] 14:58, 8 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Amorrow is the user who started the discussion you're commenting in. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:04, 8 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Reeves, if your going to troll, you need an upgrade. Don't be so amatuerish about it. Show us something new and witty so we can develop appropriate countermeasures. You're obviously not stupid. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 8 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Not a Troll, just following guidelines to not start a new section unless it hasn't been posted--[[User:Reevestehsnek|Reevestehsnek]] ([[User talk:Reevestehsnek|talk]] 16:09, 8 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Like I am legit confused, During these last few Hours I get the feeling that you 1990s guy either think Im trying to wreck youre words or that I'm a troll. I also get the feeling that I am extremely unwelcome. Like is all this because I'm black. Because if that's the case Ill leave this site like real pronto.--[[User:Reevestehsnek|Reevestehsnek]] ([[User talk:Reevestehsnek|talk]] 16:26, 8 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::You're confusing me with RobS, who also commented right above. I did not accuse you of trolling. If you feel unwelcome, it's probably because you're new, and you are not familiar with CP's rules. Also, CP is an '''extremely''' high target of vandalism, so we act the same way for '''every''' new user to vet them. Your skin color (which nobody knows) has nothing to do with it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:58, 8 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Also, we '''recommend''' that you make a new section on a talk page. We discourage commenting on a two-year-old section about a completely different topic. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:11, 8 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pitch hitting==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the ref [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Donald_Trump&amp;amp;oldid=1293435]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:34, 18 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. Always happy to help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:15, 18 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trump==&lt;br /&gt;
You're not telling me it's just a coincidence, are you? [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 18:44, 23 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Seriously? It is extremely unlikely that this passage, which is about the Second Coming of Christ, has anything to do with Donald Trump. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:46, 23 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Dang :( Thought I'd had my first ever conservative insight. Must be the morphine. [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 18:56, 23 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think this has more to do with biblical [[hermeneutics]] than conservatism. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:00, 23 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Merry Christmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Merry Christmas.gif|cebter|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for all your contributions to Conservaoedia as far your web article content. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merry Christmas!  And have a happy New Year's Day. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:37, 24 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you very much, Conservative, and the same to you as well! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:43, 24 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest doing the redirect in the opposite direction for two reasons.  First, it preserves the history and visits to the pre-existing entry.  Second, it leaves intact the &amp;quot;Saint&amp;quot; spelled out, which is a stronger and more effective title than the secularized abbreviation.  I'd be happy to change the direction of the redirect, if you agree.  Regardless, thanks for your efforts!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:01, 27 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes please, Mr. Schlafly, that would be great if you would move it. Just as long as the article shows up as being created by me on the &amp;quot;New Pages&amp;quot; feed. I didn't know that this article already existed, but I worked hard on it and I think that my article is of higher quality by any objective measure. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:39, 28 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==European immigration==&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking of doing an article on the [[European immigration]] problem (don't want to call 'European immigration crisis', yet). Americans are woefully ignorant of what's happening in Europe, and we're looking at doing perhaps the biggest change in Immigration law since 1952. In Europe, whole new political parties have been spawned because of the establishment parties failure to deal with the problems. In 20 years, the German mi!itary may be majority Muslim which would impact the future of the NATO alliance. Better get started now in educating the American public on changing demographics and how this may affect America's role as a Superpower, assuming it still is by then. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you care to collaborate? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:39, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course, I'll be happy to help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:39, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Do you think we should add a subsection under UK about Brexit and to what extent that was motivated by immigration? Also, I'd like to include something about the Schengen Agreement. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:46, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Both of those are great ideas. The &amp;quot;freedom of movement&amp;quot; EU policy played a large part in the referendum and its aftermath. People are tired of unlimited immigration.&lt;br /&gt;
:::As for the Schengen area, people can go anywhere they want in Europe without worrying about border security (and before, it was quite tough crossing the border I've heard). The agreement is an essential part of the EU plan to reach full political unification. It really has nothing to do with economics. Also, criminals and terrorists can easily cross the border. The recent Berlin attacker was caught in Italy. He crossed at least two borders without being caught. Imagine if he tried doing that without the agreement. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:53, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Same as most of suspects in 1200 reported sexual assault cases New Years Eve in Cologne. Something like only 7 or 22 arrests have ever been made, while most of the other identified suspects are reported to have fled the country.[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''#NeverHillary'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:06, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Father's SSN ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created [[Social Security Death Index]]. After I add some ref's, I hope that we can revisit the notion of me declaring what my father's SSN is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just to mention where I got this idea from, it is from the web site anusha.com . Sloan has lived an erratic and at times immoral life, but he is just below the level of genius in raw talent. I refer to him as an &amp;quot;accidental adventurer&amp;quot;. Please see thermo4thermo.org/sam_sloan.html for some of his life-adventures.&lt;br /&gt;
I am not promoting his lifestyle, but he is my publisher for my upcoming book. His web site is a mess. It has about 3000 pages but just a mess of cross-references. The home page is very, very long.  You can look at pages like www.anusha.com/pafc147.htm . He also has pages like www.anusha.com/uncles-p.htm . His memory is almost perfect. Near Total Recall. Anyway, I hope we can engage in dialog about my father's SSN.--[[User:Amorrow|Amorrow]] ([[User talk:Amorrow|talk]]) 22:11, 3 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==Hate crime==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear 1990'sguy, I am not trying to get into an edit war with you, but I believe that you are misreading the hate crime laws.  They do not address &amp;quot;hate speech,&amp;quot; just violence or other criminal acts against target groups that receive a lot of hate.  I suggest that you do further research, and I hope that you will come to the same conclusion. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 20:31, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:For clarification, are you telling me that hate crime laws do not cover &amp;quot;hate speech&amp;quot;? Regardless, I think we should mention that slowly (but steadily) speaking out for biblical Christian principles (opposition to homosexual marriage, saying Islam is a false religion, etc.) is being seen as &amp;quot;hate speech&amp;quot; and vulnerable to being criminalized. See this recent story[https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/simon-turpin/2016/01/08/northern-ireland-pastor-not-guilty-criticising-islam/] and please note the recent attempts to censor Christian sermons in Houston (I don't know if other cities did the same). Censorship of Christian and conservative opinions is growing, and I could a few (but probably unrelated to hate crimes) examples. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:09, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, while you can keep you additions, would you please restore the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hate_crime&amp;amp;curid=3861&amp;amp;diff=1298155&amp;amp;oldid=1298153 material you deleted in this edit] (particularly those three completely deleted paragraphs)? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:11, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for fixing the dead link and finding an additional source.  You are exactly right. Hate crime and hate speech are completely different.  All Conservatives disapprove of speech codes, &amp;quot;safe spaces policy&amp;quot; and political correctness.  The First Amendment is clear that regulation of speech must be neutral as to the message.  The person(s) who wrote the [[Hate crime]] article years ago got a bit tangled up.  Liberals want hate speech codes, and Conservatives oppose them.  Both Liberals and Conservatives have voted to enact true hate crime laws to protect religious freedom and to address hate violence on the basis of race.  Some Conservatives argue that the list of hate targets in those laws should not include &amp;quot;sexual orientation,&amp;quot;  but that argument does not belong in a section discussing protecting religion.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I took out the two paragraphs because they were repetitive, out-of-place and not germaine.  Why not add them to [[Hate speech]]? Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 21:39, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thank you for clarifying and for moving the content. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:00, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You are welcome.  Our discussion here was a bit time delayed. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 22:02, 7 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to include the legislative history, it should explain which bill that was finally adopted that is being discussed and how the bill that was adopted differs from the earlier bills.  The people that worked on this article years ago were obviously opposed to a series of bills and were making arguments on why a bill would be bad.  Their narative is out of date.  We have a number of state and federal hate crime laws on the books and we need to describe what exists, give facts and statistics about how the laws work, and include some commentary on whether the law has been applied fairly.   If you want to expand the history section beyond the two sentences that I have explaining how the federal law expanded the role of the FBI, please do so.  But the fact that certain people sponsored bills that did not pass before a bill did pass is not helpful unless you explain what changes were made or how the early efforts illumniates our understanding of the bill that passed. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 00:50, 13 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:If these proposed bills became law, we should definitely include this (even if we word it differently). We should do this in order to inform the public about leftist laws and to show that they didn't always exist. Unfortunately, I am quite busy right now, so I cannot do anything about this at the moment. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:49, 13 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::1990sguy, these bills did '''not''' become law.  A similar bill later became law. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 01:10, 14 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Not to sidetrack your guys discussion, but let me point out (cause the media hasn't) we have just witnessed something very rare and unusual in the US. Traditionally, because of state sovereignty, the states prosecute murder cases and federal government's role is restricted, for most of our history, to capital cases in the US military. In the 20th century federal crimes like murdering the president, or terrorism on federal property causing death ([[Timothy McVeigh]]), were added. This guy, [http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/12/us/dylann-roof-death-penalty-explainer/ Dylann Roof], has just been sentenced to death for violating peoples civil rights with a hate crime enhancement, and ''not for murder''. The federal government does not have the legal authority to try this as a murder case. In fact, Roof probably never will be tried for murder cause the State of South Carolina isn't gonna spend the time and money to do it after the feds are done. In my lifetime, I think this is only the fourth case like this I ever heard of, tho I'm sure there's been a few others. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Make Exxon Great Again]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:37, 13 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Rob, this happened a lot in the 1960s. Civil rights workers would go South and were murdered and either the murder was not prosecuted or a local jury would acquit the accused.  The FBI would then investigate and the US DOJ would successfully prosecute for civil rights violations in Federal Court.  The question is whether there is enough of a commerce clause basis to allow for the passage of such federal crimes, and the courts have upheld them on the grounds that if the federal government did not prevent such intimidation, people would not feel safe crossing state lines.  Also, many states have suspended or abolished the death penalty, while it remains available in federal court.  State &amp;quot;sovereignty&amp;quot; is very limited and not ''actual'' sovereignty in the legal sense.  To me, this is a more interesting aspect of the Hate crime article than whether or not the definition should be expanded to include &amp;quot;gender identity.&amp;quot; [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 01:08, 14 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I'm not sure it happened &amp;quot;a lot&amp;quot;. There was the 'Mississippi Burning' case, where the local cops and others were charged with civil rights violations, but no one served more than a six year sentence. This is why &amp;quot;hate crime&amp;quot; legislation was added later, cause sentences were too light for a &amp;quot;civil rights violation resulting in death&amp;quot;. The problem in those days were all-white juries exonerating murder cases, so the feds invented a way they could prosecute killers. One guy was convicted in a state trial [http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/price&amp;amp;bowers/killen.htm 40 years later in 2005 of manslaughter,] but he wasn't the trigger man. No one has ever been charged with the actual killings.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Then there was Salt Lake City case of a civil rights violation resulting in death in 1978, but Utah was never part of the Confederacy, was not put under federal scrutiny in the Voting Rights Act, nor has a history of all-white jurries exonersting whites accused of murdering blacks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In the 1990s, Brian Beckwith was convicted of violating Medgar Evers civil rights by killing him in the 1970s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In the 90s Timothy McVeigh was the first person executed by the federal government since, like 1956.  But this was a terrorism charge resulting in death, not a civil rights violation, AFAIK. ([https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/3azq6b/eli5how_timothy_mcveigh_only_got_convicted_of_8/ McVeigh was only charged with 8 counts of murder, although 168 were killed]). Since McVeigh, there's been maybe one or two other cases of people executed by the federal government.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Bottomline, the federal hate crime enhancement was added cause, while the feds proved they could get a conviction where the state failed to act, the penalty was too low. Since its inception, it's hard to find a single case that the law was used for what it was designed for. There is no evidence whatsoever that South Carolina would not prosecute Dylann Roos, or an all-white jury would have exonerated him if the feds failed to intrude. South Carolina has lost its right to govern itself, its sovereignty. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Make Exxon Great Again]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:32, 14 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If this is true, then it definitely should be added. It would give yet another ignored example of massive governmental expansion and movement towards socialism. JDano, if the 2009 proposal did not become law, then what did the actual law consist of? If the bill that was listed on the article did not become law, then there is no point in including it. However, a legislative history of successful bills would be good. However, I am still quite busy, so I will not attempt to do anything about this at the moment. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:49, 14 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contest==&lt;br /&gt;
I will provide the details you seek when i get some time. You were in the top 5. --Jpatt 10:19, 16 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for the reply Jpatt! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:40, 16 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== discuession ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am continuing the discussion on my talk page.--[[User:Amorrow|Amorrow]] ([[User talk:Amorrow|talk]]) 10:39, 22 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Question==&lt;br /&gt;
What would be the best word to describe Eurosceptic's opponents? Eurocentric? Pan European? Some other? I don't like globalist in this context. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Make Exxon Great Again]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:42, 28 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I would say either &amp;quot;Europeanists,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Europhiles,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Euro-Federalists&amp;quot; are the best. They either seem to be the most used terms. Of those three, I would personally opt for the first. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:00, 28 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ban editing ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I've noticed you sometimes change blocks by other admins to increase the time or make in infinite.  I appreciate your intentions, but just thought I would point out a couple things.  Firstly, the blocking admin generally has the final say over the block they have imposed.  For example, if a person want to dispute the ban, they are to go to the blocking admin, and that admin decides whether to revoke the ban or not (as can be seen [[Conservapedia:Quick_reference#If_you_get_blocked|here]]).  Since you are not revoking a block, it's probably not as big of an issue, but it still seems to be proper etiquette. Of course, full admins have authority over assistants such as you and I, so they have the right to direct revise of revoke blocks we make.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, While it makes good sense to block those people forever, it doesn't really work that way.  A ban applies to the username, and the IP from which they edited if the option is selected--nothing more.  Vandals almost always use servers to redirect their connection, however, so that their true IP is never seen by CP.  This means that when we block those users, we are really just blocking the server they were using.  This is a good thing too, but the problem is that these servers are usually assigned new IPs periodically, so the block no longer applies--now the blocked IP is unassigned.  Since most people in the western world still use IPv4, there are not that many spare IP addresses, so the IP is soon assigned to someone else. Now some innocent person is using an IP which for all eternity has been blocked on CP.  They probably will never even know, but if we set infinite blocks enough, the chances of that happening regularly increase continuously.  I know some people here do use infinite block regularly, but in my opinion its a logistical problem.  This is why I almost always set a time limit, or block only the username infinitely, and leave the IP unblocked (which I prefer not to do).&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your ongoing efforts! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:05, 31 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yikes, I should have thought of that. The thought of indefinitely blocking innocent people from CP certainly is not a good thing. If you haven't reverted by block change, feel free to undo it. I'm too busy right now to do it myself. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:11, 31 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The chances of that happening from a couple blocks are pretty low, but it can add up.  Anyway, no harm done.  I just thought I'd mention it. Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:24, 31 January 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I apologize for adding to a discussion which is over a year old.  However, DMorris straightened me out about this, and I wanted to belatedly set the record straight. When a user is blocked, the username/account is blocked for a specified amount of time, but the IP address is only blocked for 24 hours, unless it is banned separately. Autoblock will put a 24-hour ban on all IPs used by the banned account, though I'm not sure if it also blocks IPs which log into the banned account at a later time...I believe it does.  Therefore, it seems we do not need to worry about the last point I made, as I was mistaken.  Once DMorris corrected me, I did some research and testing, which confirmed what he told me. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:03, 28 March 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:23, 28 March 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== expand ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Gainful employment]]. Yes. I dare you to.--[[User:Amorrow|Amorrow]] ([[User talk:Amorrow|talk]]) 08:32, 4 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Why? What's the purpose of you messaging me? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:25, 4 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Abortion]] article==&lt;br /&gt;
It's open for you to make your suggested additions.  As to the Leif Ericson image, what needs to happen is a new image uploaded in its place.  I'll try to find one later.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 13:18, 6 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:New Leif image uploaded and added to article. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 12:56, 7 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:02, 7 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Addiction article and TAR ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello again, Regarding the [[Addiction]] article and specifically its categories, I agree with JDano. Let me attempt to explain:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;TAR&amp;quot; is short for [[User:TheAmericanRedoubt|TheAmericanRedoubt]] a former user and assistant SysOp here at Conservapedia. People have differing opinions of him, but mine is that he did offer some valuable contributions, but also did not understand and did not learn the rules of CP. Among some other issues, he tended to add many &amp;quot;See also&amp;quot; links to articles which were not sufficiently relevant and did the same with categories.  Thus, when editors refer to &amp;quot;TAR&amp;quot; they are usually talking about this debris, which should not exist.  TheAmericanRedoubt (TAR) has since stopped editing here, and his account has been deleted.  However, some of the links and categories he inserted still exists, and make things look messy.  For this reason, a number of editors (including myself) try to clean up these issues and restore a little more order.  The guide page [[Conservapedia:How to create and maintain high-quality articles]] was the direct result of TAR's methods.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the categories specifically, it's best to maintain a &amp;quot;tree&amp;quot; structure.  A page should not connect to categories which also contain subcategories it links to. Also, it should link only to categories which contain it, not categories which the page topic can contain.  In other words, a page &amp;quot;drug&amp;quot; should be in the category &amp;quot;medicines&amp;quot; but not in a category &amp;quot;antibiotics&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this clarifies a bit. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:42, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please allow me to apologize for my impatience with the &amp;quot;addiction&amp;quot; article.  You accidentally stepped into the remains of a hornets' nest.  TAR added lots of utterly irrelevant see-also's and categories, in what can only be described as an attempt to turn this wiki into survivalist-pedia, or perhaps James-Wesley-Rawles-pedia.  He offended a huge number of people with his implications that we were all supposed to stockpile bullets, batteries, and other survivalist stuff (I could look it up but it's too nauseating) and move to a &amp;quot;redoubt&amp;quot; in Idaho or similar place while we wait for the apocalypse.  We were also all supposed to be into some kind of crackpot Indian alternative medicine.  (I think it was called &amp;quot;ayurvedic&amp;quot; or something like that; once again too nauseating.)  The whole wiki was in an enormous uproar for a few months.  (And Cons, who really doesn't subscribe to that stuff, nevertheless stirred up the pot by pretending to be in email contact with the guy.)&lt;br /&gt;
:So if you see suspicious see-also's or categories, especially with codewords like &amp;quot;nanny state&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;gun-grabbing&amp;quot;, be aware this might be detritus from TAR.  I support the second amendment, but I don't support putting all this survivalist garbage into an article on fire hydrants.&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:36, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::It has taken a huge amount of work to undo TAR's damage.  I suppose that you think that there is a bias against any change he had made, and there is probably some truth to that.  He did not understand that our categories have a tree structure.  Instead, he thought of categories as a word association test.   Putting in excess categories and excessive red links makes Conservapedia less appealing to users and lowers our google search engine rankings.  In theory, every article could be in every category, because there is some plausible connection between any two subjects.  If we had a separate article on &amp;quot;Drug Addiction&amp;quot; then it could have categories like [[:Category:Illegal Drugs]] or [[:Category:Drugs]].  The problem is that [[:Category:Illegal Drugs]] is a subcategory of [[:Category:Drugs]] ''breaking up the category tree with an infinite loop.'' Here the Addiction article is on a much higher level that discusses video games, etc. So, it is not useful to a high school student looking for information about illegal drugs, in my opinion. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 05:46, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you all for your explanations. Considering these things, I will try not to get in the way next time this clean up occurs. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:13, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You helped make [http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/conservapedia.com THIS] happen. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have never seen a non-profit website go from below 100,000 rank to nearly a 50,000 Alexa ranking in about a year. And Andy payed zero dollars for internet marketing services during this period. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And there is no sign of a nearing web traffic plateau. My guess is that Trump supporters/Trump era and the resulting political waves significantly explains the boost in traffic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump supporters seem very loyal so the traffic boost could be long lasting. It also seems like there is a reawakening of right-wing politics/nationalism that will be long lasting.  And right-wing populism and &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; go together like peanut butter and jelly. :)  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:30, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome, and thank ''you'' for all your edits! I'm happy to help improve the quality of Conservapedia. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:56, 13 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
==Quick project==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Guy:&lt;br /&gt;
Our state articles list the members of Congress from each state, but they have not be updated for 2016.  If five editors could update 10 states each, we would be done quickly.  Could you please take a look at [[Conservapedia:Community Portal#Political directory]]? Thanks in advance, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 16:13, 15 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for your help with the project and with People's Party. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 23:02, 21 February 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tip ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your terrific work.  One tip: the licensing information should be expressly included in the uploads.  I added it here: [[File:EU_member_states.png]].  Thanks again for your edits and uploads.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:27, 7 March 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for the tip. I will remember to add the information next time. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:34, 7 March 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Template:Book]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Try working on it now.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 10:48, 11 March 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few months ago, you told me to ask you any questions I had, so here goes:&lt;br /&gt;
*When recategorizing the massive and messy [Category:Authors] by nationality, I found two authors, [[Theo Hobson]] and [[Carl Sagan]], whom I could not recategorize as [Category:American Authors].  Could you change them for me?&lt;br /&gt;
*When fixing the [[Francois Rabelais]] cedilla mess, I set up a redirect.  Has anyone ever made a loop out of redirects?  If so, what happened?  I'm scared to try it.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lastly, where is my attention now best sent - expanding the author articles, improving our coverage of science and mathematics, or maybe tackling another recat job, like [Category:Music]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:1) Concerning [[Theo Hobson]] and [[Carl Sagan]], those articles are protected, and as an assistant sysop, I do not have the ability to edit them. I recommend asking someone like [[User:Karajou]] or CP's owner, [[User:Aschlafly]] to either unlock the articles to allow you to fix the category or to have them change the cat themselves. I've made many similar requests to them and they will be happy to help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:2) I have not heard of someone doing that before. I personally don't think anything bad would happen if someone did try it, as you can still access the actual redirect page to remove the loop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:3) Honestly, all three choices are great. If I were you, I would probably choose to expand the articles already created so that the average reader would find them more interesting and worthwhile, rather than just seeing a stub. After that, I would personally move on to work on another category, so that CP is better-organized. Then after that, I would do math and science, which is (as far as I can tell) on a different theme than your other work. This is my personal preference, but if you would prefer doing it in a different order feel free! You have been very helpful to CP, and I appreciate your work. Keep it up! :) --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:20, 14 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Hi, just a quick note: A redirect loop shouldn't be a problem.  I think the user is only redirected once, so after that they see the second redirect page.  Redirect loops, double redirects, and dead redirects should all be avoided when possible.  Thanks for your contributions! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:23, 14 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are entirely correct, DavidB4; I just tried a loop with soda and pop (and removed it).  Typing one would give you the page for the other, and an option to redirect.  I'll proceed to expand the author pages now.  Feel free to removed this section to abridge the talk page.--[[User:Abcqwe|Abcqwe]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 15:58, 15 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Could you please write this article? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you please write this important article: [[Atheism and ethics]]? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I may ask another writer or tow to contribute to it also.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:07, 18 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I think I will be able to find some time to do it. Unfortunately, I have other things on my to-do list (even for CP), but this article is important, and I will try to find time to help. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:10, 18 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::OK. Thanks. I think [[User:Pokeria1]] will be assisting you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:55, 18 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Sources to help you write an article ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.spectator.co.uk/2014/04/ethics-for-atheists/# Would human life be sacred in an atheist world?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheists_more_immoral.html Atheism Doesn't Lead to Immoral Behavior - Or Does It?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/atheism_determinism_morality.html Does Atheism (Determinism) Negatively Impact Morality?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://apologetics-notes.comereason.org/2015/03/atheism-ethics-and-immorality.html Atheism, Ethics, and Immorality]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thinkingchristian.net/posts/2016/01/good-nothing-make-atheist-ethics-better-christian/ Being Good “For Nothing” — Does That Make Atheist Ethics Better Than Christian?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/questions-on-atheism-ethics-and-marital-conflict Questions on Atheism, Ethics, and Marital Conflict]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-and-ethics Atheism and ethics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secular sources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H5 Secular Morality]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H4 The Moral Evaluation of Religion]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additional sources:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.paulcopan.com/articles/pdf/God-naturalism-morality.pdf God, Naturalism, and the Foundations of Morality] by Paul Copan&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.equip.org/articles/atheists-and-the-quest-for-objective-morality/ Atheists and the Quest for Objective Morality] by Chad Meister &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://themelios.thegospelcoalition.org/article/the-amorality-of-atheism The amorality of atheim] by Rob Smith&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.reasonablefaith.org/can-we-be-good-without-godCan Can we be good without God?] by William Lane Craig]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/atheism#atheism-and-ethics Atheism and ethics and morality] by Ken Ammi&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.doesgodexist.org/NovDec06/AtheisticExplanations.html Atheist explanations of morality and common sense]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2015/09/does_being_an_atheist_interfer.html Does being an atheist interfere with being moral?] by Lydia McGrew&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://americanvision.org/2742/nietzsche-slaps-down-dawkins-on-the-illusion-of-atheist-morality/ Nietzsche slaps down Dawkins on the illusion of atheist morality] by Dr. Joel McDurmon&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== quick note ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you be interested in email communication with me? My email is userconservative135@gmail.com &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please let me know if you are interested. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:54, 18 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, that would be great! I've been thinking for some time of setting up a CP email address account, and I'll do that within the next couple of days. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:29, 18 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::OK. That sounds good. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:02, 19 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Here it is: 1990sguysdg@gmail.com --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:46, 21 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I just sent you an email. Let me know if you got it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:10, 21 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I wrote another response to your email. Please check your email box. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:05, 22 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I got your latest email and responded to it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:41, 22 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== If you are interested, another article that needs to be created ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are interested, another article that needs to be created: [[Secular ethics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sources about this topic:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secular_ethics Secular ethics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H5 Secular Morality]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iep.utm.edu/n-atheis/#H4 The Moral Evaluation of Religion]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:11, 20 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== A couple more article suggestions related to atheism and morality ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, here are a few more articles that need to be written about atheism and morality:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolutionary ethics]], Wikipedia has an article on it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_ethics&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ethical naturalism]], Wikipedia has an article on it at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_naturalism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ethical subjectivism]], Wikipedia has an article on this subject at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethical_subjectivism&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your assistance on the [[Atheism and ethics]] article. It was much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:21, 22 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Project I invited you to participate in plus   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the project I invited you to participate in: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Atheism Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be easy to find relevant online material in order to create some of the articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:19, 22 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you, Conservative, for your suggestions. I will begin on some of these soon. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:53, 22 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I sent you an email. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:57, 24 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocking user &amp;quot;reformed&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, I've got to say that vandalizing the user page of someone with block authority is '''really''' stupid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I take issue with your claim that he was an &amp;quot;obvious sock&amp;quot;.  As one who has been blocked a number of times on completely bogus socking charges, I take that stuff seriously.  (The blocking was generally done by someone (now deceased) who had &amp;quot;checkuser&amp;quot; privileges and therefore had good tools for detecting socks, but did not understand how internet addresses work.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is not at all obvious to me, as one who has a lot of experience at CP, that he was a sock.  He was a vandal, and you should block him for that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, dear.  Now I see that there's a big storm of this stuff going on.  And, yes, these guys, or at least some of them, are probably socks of each other.  And at least one of them is using the name &amp;quot;obvioussock&amp;quot;, just to taunt you.  And one says he used to be a washing machine in his previous life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My goodness!  I think you are being trolled!  :-)  :-)  And no, I had nothing to do with this.  Just block them.  It will blow over soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:54, 25 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for your message. :) Due to the fact that &amp;quot;reformed&amp;quot; was created right after I blocked two users and vandalized my user page, I assumed that it was a clear sock of one or both of them. However, as it was not clear to you and possibly others, I changed the block settings to just include vandalism. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:06, 25 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Screw up==&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, I'm working with a tablet, and it's a piece of garbage. I didn't intentionally remove your comments. Sorry. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''CIA v Trump updated score'':CIA 3, Trump 2]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 25 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Assuming you're referring to those at [[Talk:Main Page]], apology accepted. It can happen to the best of us. They were other user's edits, however. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:33, 25 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For your reverts yesterday on my userpage, saw the sock puppet master was not finished with his trolling. [[User:YortKeldher|YortKeldher]] ([[User talk:YortKeldher|talk]]) 07:37, 26 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:54, 26 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Vaccination ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for your improvements to [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Vaccination]]. [[User:Desmonduk|Desmonduk]] ([[User talk:Desmonduk|talk]]) 16:13, 29 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:30, 29 March 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== small request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I sent you a message at the last place we communicated. Can you please read that message? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:59, 6 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I sent you the information I promised.  It is located at the place we last communicated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:36, 6 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sent you message. Please check place we last communicated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::I sent you a quick note to the place we last communicated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:51, 18 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Could you please go to the place we last communicated? It is regarding another matter. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Photo size==&lt;br /&gt;
With a large photo, there is much more word wrap in the table of contents, which makes it even longer.  We need a wide table of contents. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 19:08, 10 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've checked and double-checked, and I see no way how the larger-sized photo does anything to the table of contents. And I'm using a standard Google Chrome, 100% zoom screen. Could it be your search engine/zoom? I don't see any reason why the larger image is a problem in any way. I think it looks better, regardless. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:06, 10 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::On Firefox the TOC is longer due to word wrap.  You can get other pictures to help fill the space, but the space will be shorter if the TOC is wider. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 23:19, 10 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I am getting a lot of 500 errors.  I will wait for you to finish, and then I will go back and apply my changes. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 11:07, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have done my changes. But please, when making those changes, please do ''not'' revert changes I have made, particularly changes that I have already reverted you multiple times. I'm tired of these disputes. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:09, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009.  It is now registered and somewhat set up.  I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel.  Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering.  In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later.  If you are interested, please let me know!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:33, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for your response. I have never used or really even heard of IRC prior before now (or, more accurately, before you and Andy started talking about it). What is the purpose of IRC? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:47, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is perhaps the oldest form of instant messaging.  It is basically a chat room, where people can join and idle or actively chat.  Visitors can ask members questions, and members can collaborate.  There is even file sharing, if that would be useful.  I'm going to be writing a how-to-use guide to explain the actual usage better.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Most people use software clients, which they install (or run portably, which a whole different story), but web clients are also available, such as [https://kiwiirc.com/client?settings=7c7240c62a5d4861a8ad0ba697929f39 this one].  With the web client, you can just pick a name and connect, without installing anything.  Also, since IRC has been around so long, software for it is compatible with almost anything.  All desktop and most mobile operating systems support it. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:55, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for the info! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:24, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: Vandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already took care of that and left a note for [[User talk:Teapublican|Teapublican]] on his talk page. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 00:09, 20 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:08, 20 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Recent item on maintalk -- congratulations! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, I just couldn't resist making fun of you there.  I immediately recognized the Breitbart article, as one that I had seen shortly before.  And then I saw that it was you.  No hard feelings, I hope.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:22, 24 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:None at all. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:37, 24 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Congratulations!  The [[March for Science]] article is a ''really good article''.  And you made it so.  (Well, with a little prodding from me.)  It sets out, straightforwardly, what was going on, and it doesn't descend into namecalling.  I realize that you probably have very strong disagreements with what most of those people were doing, but you kept it professional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Really good articles, especially on potential &amp;quot;hot button&amp;quot; issues of politics, aren't all that common.  Now maybe I will make another attempt to return the [[Pussy Riot]] article to the good state it was in back when I expanded it in 2014, before it got messed up with the implication that anyone who opposes murderous thug tyrant Vladimir Putin must be a &amp;quot;leftist&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;elitist&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;social justice warrior&amp;quot;.  For which I was blocked, in blatant violation of the rules of this site.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 14:25, 26 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for the compliment! Unfortunately, the router I'm using blocked the &amp;quot;Pussy Riot&amp;quot; article because of the first word in the title, so I cannot comment on that at all. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:00, 26 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::How sad.  I have created the redirect [[Nadezhda Tolokonnikova]] in case that helps.  But it probably won't.  You had no trouble typing the &amp;quot;P&amp;quot; word above, so I guess it's a problem of your router not going to a page with that word in the title.  Maybe I should have named the page with its Cyrillc letters: &amp;quot;Пусси Райот&amp;quot;.  Well, you're not missing anything of cosmic importance.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:42, 26 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The redirect actually did work. Thanks! The article does not appear to have a high quality (at least in the aesthetic sense), so changes would probably be beneficial, but if you're going to make changes, I would like to remind you to be cautious and not to contradict CP's POV. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:17, 26 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::In case you forgot, Sam &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;(and how fast it appears that happens with you)&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt;, it was ''you'' who violated the rules of this site by putting a liberal POV into that article (among others, [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/SamHB per your history]) in the first place, then insistently readding it after your edit was reverted and you were warned about violating CP policy and about starting fights with other editors. You really should take the advice you're being given here and not continue violating CP policy. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 21:59, 26 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few things:&lt;br /&gt;
*Today is my 9th anniversary at Conservapedia!&lt;br /&gt;
*I can assure everyone that I am very familiar with, and well versed in, the rules, commandments, guidelines, customs, and habits of CP.  I am also familiar with the many, many, many discussions of these points that have taken place over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
*@Northwest: this is the expected response.&lt;br /&gt;
*@1990's guy: this is ''not'' the response I expected.  I'm chagrined that you think the article is of low quality.  Especially since you know how to write high quality articles.&lt;br /&gt;
I'm serious.  I was proud of that article as originally written/expanded by me.  I thought it laid out the facts accurately, and avoided name-calling and such.  Exactly like the March for Science article.  Please look at the article (preferably the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pussy_Riot&amp;amp;oldid=1328015] version, before name-calling got put in) and fix it up as you see fit.  The name-calling consisted, among other things, of saying that those people around the world who took an interest in the case were &amp;quot;elitists&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;social justice warriors on the left&amp;quot;.  The latter term is straight out of Huffington Post and their ilk.  It is a term of bleeding hearts in America, and not used widely elsewhere.  In any case, one doesn't need to be an SJW to oppose murderous thug tyrant Vladimir Putin.  In fact, given the recent falling out between President Trump and Putin, the accepted orthodoxy here at CP might be swinging away from support for the murderous thug.  I hope so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please improve the article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 11:28, 28 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My problem is not with content; it is with organization, layout, aesthetics, etc. There are no subsections, which at least show the reader how the article is organized; it is just many paragraphs. Such articles do not appeal to the reader. IMO, it feels like reading a textbook. If it is just a few paragraphs, it is fine, but thus article has ten paragraphs. Adding a few headers and possibly an image would be beneficial (and I realized just as I wrote this that the March for Science article is approaching that length as well, so I probably either should just keep my mouth shut or add headers there as well). I did not mean to insult or degrade your work, and I apologize for giving that impression. BTW, happy 9th anniversary! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:46, 28 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sam - by your response, you're only proving what I said about your tactics and your history here right. You claim to be &amp;quot;very familiar with, and well versed in, the rules, commandments, guidelines, customs, and habits of CP&amp;quot;, but you only pay lip service to them here while your actions on CP over the years (and even now) are showing that you simply choose to disregard them for the sake of pushing liberal POV on this site and to start fights with those who don't share your viewpoint. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 18:08, 28 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bill Nye ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you please contact me by email at sam4557@gmail.com?  I think we can make a really good article out of this.  I have a number of criticisms of his behavior--my opinion of him has gone down a whole lot over the last few weeks, and I think I have some insights about this that I'd like to bounce off of you.  I know that you and I disagree totally about evolution and creationism, but we can put together a good article stating the facts.  We can stay away from the name-calling that so many articles contain, and avoid things like &amp;quot;so-and-so falsely believes that ...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is ''not'' about Pussy Riot, ''not'' about Conservapedia politics, and ''not'' about you-know-who.  I just want to bounce some ideas off of you about Bill Nye and see if we can put together a really nice article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:00, 4 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Expanded article, footnote did not support genocide/racist abortions adequately ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I greatly expanded this article [[Abortion and eugenics]].  The footnote in the liberal article was not supporting or at the very least inadequately supporting racist/genocidal abortion policies of [[Margaret Sanger]], etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, I skimmed the article as far as the footnoted article and it did not appear to strongly support such a big claim like abortion/genocide, etc. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 01:26, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Something isn't right here==&lt;br /&gt;
... Ohhh I know what it is. ''Margaret Thatcher'' is on the list of liberals. ''Margaret. Thatcher.'' The bastion of conservatism. A favourite of Reagan. How in the ''world'' did she make the liberal list? [[User:Koidevelopment|Vive]] [[User talk:Koidevelopment|Liberté!]] 09:14, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Wasn't me who added her. She was not as conservative as people think she is, as she did vote in favor of legalizing abortion and homosexuality. But, that said, it would probably be better without mentioning her, to avoid people focusing on her mention in the article. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:24, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::She might not have been a perfect conservative, but I still think she probably doesn't belong on that list.  Of course, if you go back 80 years and read writings and speeches from liberals of the day, they sound downright conservative now.  Still, she did defend liberty and much of conservatism. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:18, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lady Thatcher's criticism of Simon Callow's performance in ''Amadeaus'' made her homophobic, I thought. Being homophobic wouldn't preclude one from being liberal however, [[Bill Moyers]] and Louis Black for example. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The coup plotters won, for now'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I assume that adding the liberalism template to the [[Episcopal Church]] article was improper? I would like to know what the proper usage of this template is for future reference. TEC is one of, if not the most liberal Christian denomination in the US these days, sadly. I do apologize for this improper usage, as I am a new editor. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 15:00, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello Anglican! I removed the template because I thought the article was outside the scope of the &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; template. What I mean is that the template links to liberal traits, but not necessarily to liberal organizations. I think the category is good for the article, but not template. I hope this helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:11, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::That makes sense. Thank you for your patience. It's sad what has happened to the Episcopal Church in recent years. --[[User:Anglican|Anglican]] ([[User talk:Anglican|talk]]) 15:14, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You're welcome, and I agree. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:18, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== User: Karajou sent me and others an email saying he didn't like CP's article on liberalism. So... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
User: Karajou sent me and others an email saying he didn't like CP's article on [[liberalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article needs major improvements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not going to work on it due to time restraints. I spent a lot of time improving the [[liberal]] article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would use the same approach used with the liberal article. Clearly delineate liberalism from socialism/fascism because they are very substantially different (for example, Sweden vs. Communist China vs. Nazi Germany). But mention how the gap between the ideologies has narrowed in the United States. I don't keep up with European politics to know the situation there as far as the gap other than knowing that China has become more capitalistic. European countries commonly have more major political parties in a country so the situation is more difficult to keep tabs on.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:33, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I posted the below information on RobS' talk page and thought I would share it with you also. You can go to RobS' talk page to see his response to me. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I would work on the liberalism article. But also create 2-3 sub-articles: [[American liberalism]] and [[Western liberalism]] and [[European liberalism]].  The [[American liberalism]] article is just a one sentence stub article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I suggest a [[Western liberalism]] article due to the Canadians, Australia, NZ, and South Africa. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:09, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since the Brits and Canadians have the most influence in the Anglosphere on the USA, you might want to create a [[British liberalism]] article and a [[Canadian liberalism]] article too. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Its too bad all this wasn't done before given that CP is a political website. I was largely focused on [[atheism]] which is a dying ideology. This had an indirect relation to liberalism given the prominence of the [[secular left]] on liberal/leftist politics. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:17, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: American liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I copied and pasted some of the [[liberal]] article into the [[American liberalism]] article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generally speaking, ideally you want the material in the section for main article linking to a sub-article to have substantially different content. In this case, you want the [[American liberalism]] article to have different content than the &amp;quot;American liberalism&amp;quot; section of the [[liberal]] article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So if you want to reword and/or add material to the [[American liberalism]] article the would be excellent. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:17, 9 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Opinion on renaming an article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wanted your opinion on an idea of mines to rename one of our articles on Conservapedia before taking it to an admin or someone with the ability to actually change the name of a page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The current page [[Exodus of Israel]], I think, should be renamed to [[The Exodus]], where [[Exodus of Israel]] should simply be a redirect to that page. Not many users would think of typing 'Exodus of Israel' to get to a page on 'The Exodus', and 'The Exodus' is just much simpler. As it is, [[The Exodus]] is currently a redirect to [[Exodus of Israel]]. I think it should be the other way around. Your thoughts?[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 13:34, 10 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, I think it is better the way it is. My main reason is that having titles along the lines of &amp;quot;The....&amp;quot; does not sound encyclopedic. The current name, I believe, is more high quality for that reason. Now, it is true that many users might not think of typing &amp;quot;Exodus of Israel,&amp;quot; but if they type &amp;quot;[[Exodus]],&amp;quot; they'll run into the disambiguation page and find the actual article. Also, I'm not sure that many people would think of typing &amp;quot;The Exodus.&amp;quot; To sum it up, I think the current title is better and give the article a more encyclopedic feel, but you're welcome to ask another editor what they think. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:59, 10 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the thoughts. Wikipedia currently uses 'The Exodus', and I find that it simply looks better, as a title, then 'Exodus of Israel'. Secondly, I also consider it more likely for someone to type in 'The Exodus' then 'Exodus of Israel'.[[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 15:59, 10 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Once again, if you want to ask another editor for their opinion, like DavidB4, feel free to do so. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:20, 10 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your opinion. One thing though, do you know who can get this template locked?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this point, all relevant pages have been created, and therefore this template no longer will ever need any more editing as it is complete. So the best thing to do is to get it locked to avoid any vandalism problems in the future. Just to note, before I came on, it was already locked, even though it still had many problems. Now that the template is fixed, the best thing to do is to get it locked. [[User:Korvex|Korvex]] ([[User talk:Korvex|talk]]) 20:57, 12 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I recommend asking [[User:Aschlafly]] or [[User:Karajou]]. They have protection powers. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:15, 12 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Block length==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your alert blocks.  But one year is a long time for a block.  IP addresses often change in a shorter period.  You might consider 3 months as a better block duration in many cases.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:25, 17 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:OK. I'll see to that. Should I change the blocks I just did? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:26, 17 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I just went ahead and changed them. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:41, 17 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Congratulations on Donald Trump accomplishments ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I just checked Google.  While that movie award comes up first when &amp;quot;Donald Trump achievements,&amp;quot; is Googled, and you are the first result after, you get nice results with certain other phrases:&lt;br /&gt;
*Donald Trump accomplishments - third link, no box&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump achievements - first link, no box&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump accomplishments - fourth link, no box&lt;br /&gt;
*Donald Trump achievements and failures - fourth link, no box&lt;br /&gt;
While Conservative's essays come up first when their exact titles are Googled, bear in mind that these phrases are Googled more frequently.&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations on the publicity, 1990sguy!--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 08:07, 25 May 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great job, it is well deserved! - -[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks, Nathan and DavidB, I appreciate it! It seems I chose the right article to create, in terms of gaining page views. For a while, when one searched the exact title of my article, that silly award was not at the top of the article, and in its place was a box with a picture of Trump linking to my article. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:24, 25 May 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Can you chat briefly?  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can we chat briefly? Can you please go to place I sent you messages before? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:16, 3 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Here is the the article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal vs. libertarian]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:54, 3 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== It's been great ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You've been helpful since I you first welcomed me here - me, someone who had never used wikitext or HTML in his life and never believed in a young Earth.  You've really made me consider that viewpoint, and you've done it with a brilliant personal appeal, far better than User:Conservative ever has.--[[User:Abcqwe|Nathan]] ([[User talk:Abcqwe|talk]]) 16:34, 4 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Europe's childless leaders==&lt;br /&gt;
Where do you think [http://dcwhispers.com/rather-odd-troubling-fact-european-leaders/ we can squeeze this in] [[European migrant crisis]]? In the Intro or elsewhere? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:13, 9 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think that would be a good idea. We could also, possibly, add it to the [[European Union]] article, and maybe [[Globalism]] or [[Liberal]], as these leaders advocate for left-wing globalist policies. Are you able to find other sources that note this fact? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:53, 9 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think this also illustrates liberal European values. They support mass immigration of peoples who do not share their culture while they themselves have no children. They are committing national/cultural suicide. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:15, 9 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The reason I removed Ted Nugent from Notable Texans ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because Ted Nugent is actually from Michigan. Sorry that I forgot to add an explanation. ([[User:King Conservative|King Conservative]] ([[User talk:King Conservative|talk]]) 13:37, 17 June 2017 (EDT)King Conservative)&lt;br /&gt;
:I removed him from the list. Thanks. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:16, 17 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Template tweak==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, guy! Thanks for the {{tl|See also}} in [[Neil Gorsuch]]. That template works better. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:53, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome, always happy to help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:58, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Nasty edit summaries==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear 1990sguy:  Please stop writing inflammatory edit summaries.  There is no need to make false personal attacks on other editors.  As for Breitbart, each reference is evaluated individually on its own merits.  If it is news reporting, I welcome it.  However, some references are clearly opinion-editorial pieces that criticize other news stories instead of offering any independent news gathering.  Some authors there are editorial-opinion writers rather than news reporters.  Also, when I check a source and see photos of immodestly dressed women with &amp;quot;wardrobe malfunction&amp;quot; captions or women wearing tight T-shirts imprinted with &amp;quot;no silicone&amp;quot;, I am less inclined to use those sources, given our family-friendly approach. Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 15:31, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia has no requirement that only news reporter sources can be used for mews sources. For example, many excellent conservative editorial pieces link to a news story or quote a news story while providing excellent commentary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The mainstream press. which is very liberal, have a lot more reporters and they still have some foreign bureaus if I am not mistaken. Then you have Fox which only has a fraction of the combined viewership of ABC, CBS, and NBC.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To be overly reliant on news sources merely from websites who have reporters is not a good policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, there are conservative news organizations such as CNS News. But I don't think we should limit ourselves to merely using conservative news organizations as far as news sources.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:54, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Conservative on this. We can use conservative news sources, even if the articles appear to be editorializing. This is a conservative encyclopedia, after all. Why should we adopt editing policies that give liberal MSM sources an unfair advantage? How then can we differentiate ourselves from Wikipedia? I am not opposed to citing MSM sources (I do it myself), but we should give precedence to conservative sources, which do not have leftist bias. Yes, Breitbart has silly ads, but I care more about the content of the article than the ads. There are many Breitbart writers who support conservative, Christian pro-family policies. Are there any at CNN or the NYT?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::JDano, yes, my edit summaries were inflammatory. I probably should have acted cooler when dealing with you, and for that, I apologize. Your behavior, constantly reverting and adding changes that I genuinely believe to contain leftist bias without going to the talk page until you've been reverted several times, is not constructive. I do believe your changes are undermining our status as a conservative alternative to Wikipedia. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 02:50, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== re: JDano and you getting &amp;quot;horse throwing&amp;quot; mad ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the recent edit changes, I saw you use all caps in your description of your edit. It was for the [[Travel ban]] article. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This tells me that you are starting to get &amp;quot;horse throwing&amp;quot; mad. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it becomes necessary, you can impose a [[Conservapedia:Topic bans|Conservapedia:Topic ban]] to JDano since you have blocking rights. You can make it applicable to certain articles or certain article categories. Probably a certain article would be best as a shot across his bow. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If JDano also has blocking rights, you can get Karajou/Aschlafly to impose such a ban. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:29, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. I don't know if you are correct in this matter. And I don't have time to mediate. I am just offering you a suggestion since I have experienced JDano being unreasonable at times. Also, the majority of Conservapedians/Republicans/conservatives are more fans of Trump than Lindsey Graham.  JDano appears to be in the Graham camp. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:37, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Please see my comment in the section immediately above. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 02:51, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== JDano has a topical ban imposed on him for the &amp;quot;travel ban&amp;quot; article.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just posted this message to JDano's talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You are not allowed to edit the [[travel ban]] article anymore.  I am imposing a [[Conservapedia:Topic bans|Conservapedia:Topic ban]] on you for this article.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, Indonesia is the largest Muslim country in terms of its Muslim population. The travel ban of the Trump administration does not include Indonesia.&amp;quot;[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:13, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== JDano has a topical ban imposed on him for the fake news article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I posted this on JDano's talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The [[fake news]] article was locked/protected. It seems as if the root cause of the page being locked was an edit war involving yourself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are no longer allowed to edit the fake news article. I am imposing a Conservapedia topic ban on you for this article. See: [[Conservapedia:Topic bans|Conservapedia:Topic ban]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope additional topic bans are not imposed on you by people with block rights.&amp;quot; [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:23, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Socks of JamesWilson  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socks of this clown should receive five year bans. He is a malicious provocateur, and he singlehandedly destroyed another website as well as leading dozens of people off this site. Show this schlemiel no mercy. --[[User:RonaldB|RonaldB]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 14:16, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't see why we should be giving long blocks to this guy. He's clearly using multiple ip addresses. These addresses will probably get passed to one or more people who have no intention of vandalizing CP. DavidB4 explained by long blocks are not a good idea on my talk page: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;amp;diff=1304184&amp;amp;oldid=1303142] However, I will not challenge your lengthening of that block or any other. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:20, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Maybe you do have a point because he has created a few different accounts in the past day or so. All I'm saying is that lightening up on him isn't going to work. My late friend George let this guy off easy, and he destroyed an entire community. I've had plenty of experience with this guy in the past to know his MO, and he's fanatically obsessed with Taylor Swift and &amp;quot;avenging&amp;quot; others because they &amp;quot;ruined&amp;quot; his articles. --[[User:RonaldB|RonaldB]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 14:28, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's fair. This guy is clearly bad news. Regardless of what block lengths we give him (and I can see some sense in making them longer), we should try not to accidently prevent innocent people from viewing CP. Thanks for your help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:30, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::How do we know that this editor is a &amp;quot;sock&amp;quot; of JamesWilson?  Has anyone checked the IP user logs?  The Taylor Swift connection could be a false-flag operation. If George and James got into an edit-war on a different website, that would not be relevant here.  Let's judge each editor separately until they can be linked by evidence. Are all of the problem users created in the past few days created from the same or very similar IP addresses? Thanks, [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 15:27, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::He put &amp;quot;Sad case!- James Wilson&amp;quot; in the edit summary of all of his vandalism, and it was the same stuff he's always done. If he says it's him, I'm just gonna assume it's him. Dont give this guy the benefit of the doubt. He's had plenty enough breaks here and elsewhere. --[[User:RonaldB|RonaldB]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 16:03, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::@JDano: Yes, I think it clearly is JamesWilson. His vandalism is very repetitive -- he even vandalizes the user pages of the same users. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:52, 4 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*FYI, even if an account is blocked indefinitely, the autoblock on the IPs is only for twenty-four hours. If the IP block was for as long as the account's block, checkusers wouldn't have to put separate blocks on persistent vandals' IP addresses. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 18:26, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
Since I've written a few articles on Christianity, please feel free to edit them to conform to the views of Conservapedia if necessary. Admittedly, writing about Christianity as a Jew can be a bit difficult at times. --[[User:RonaldB|Ronald]] ([[User talk:RonaldB|talk]]) 14:35, 5 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have not seen any factual problems with the articles you created. However, I do recommend that you add categories of the religion you are writing about to those articles. For example, that you add &amp;quot;Category:Christianity&amp;quot; to [[Secular Christianity]] and &amp;quot;Category:Judaism&amp;quot; to [[Secular Judaism]]. The people who practice these are not Jews (religiously speaking) or Christians, but the articles are relevant to those religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, I recommend that you add at least one source to the articles you create. Adding sources to articles is Commandment #2 in [[Conservapedia:Commandments]], and it makes the articles better for readers. They know where you are getting your information from, and they can read further if they are interested. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:51, 6 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Changing my username ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know if Andy saw my request on his talk page. Did he skip it or didn't see it? --[[User:KommissarReb|KommissarReb]] ([[User talk:KommissarReb|talk]]) 9:18, 10 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't know. Sometimes he does that, but when I message him again he usually replies. I recommend commenting again, letting him know how much you want your username changed, and asking him to respond. I think we will do it, but only if you absolutely want it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:49, 10 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I read [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Inquiry|the back and forth]] with the guy you probably were referring to on Andy's page. Andy seemed pretty reluctant to change the RonaldB's name for most of the discussion.. Is the process of changing someone's username complex or difficult to do, or did he just want to make sure that the guy wasn't being wishy-washy about the change? I was a little sheepish about asking him again because I don't want to seem annoying. --[[User:KommissarReb|KommissarReb]] ([[User talk:KommissarReb|talk]]) 5:07, 11 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I think CP admins generally prefer simply creating a new account. The user who made the other request was not the original person using the account. The original person let him take over the account. I can see why Andy wanted him to create a new account. I recommend you politely letting him know how much you want your username changed, and why, and asking him to respond, regardless of his answer. I think that would be a good move on your part. It would show how serious you are with this request. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:06, 11 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: Trump ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Donald Trump is going to get stuck with the blame for the economic bubble created by the Obama administration and the Federal Reserve.[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHwtkIpgAnA]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, TrumpCare probably will not work because it is keeping the &amp;quot;precondition clause&amp;quot; of ObamaCare due to its popularity. People will often not buy health insurance until they are sick. So the health care system will not be viable. Car insurance companies could not be profitable if people could buy their car insurance after their car accident in order to replace their car. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:00, 11 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are probably right on both of those things. The first point would be the fault of the Obama Administration, and the second by the establishment GOP Congress. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:05, 11 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Got it, thanks for letting me know. --[[User:OneTrueConservative|OneTrueConservative]] ([[User talk:OneTrueConservative|talk]]) 00:12, 12 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 00:21, 12 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Expansion of right-wing material on the internet ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.axios.com/the-partisan-explosion-of-digital-news-2279022772.html The recent explosion of right-wing news sites]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/3dy7vb/why-the-right-is-dominating-youtube Why the Right Is Dominating YouTube] - Vice News&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HndA5MoxK08 Why the Right is Dominating YouTube (A Response to Vice)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nctv.nl/binaries/psychological-effects-of-right-wing-and-islamic-extremist-internet-videos_tcm31-30177.pdf Psychological effects of right-wing and Islamic extremist videos]  - Netherlands and German report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know Twitter bans and shadow bans right-wingers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I haven't looked at the latter two items, but right-wingers gaining momentum on the internet is an interesting development.  With nationalism gaining ground in Europe and 21st century [[desecularization]] occurring, the trend is bound to continue. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scriptural Geology===&lt;br /&gt;
Scriptural Geologists published in the USA as well.  CRSQ published my review of David Lord &amp;quot;Geognosy&amp;quot; (that has other citations as well). [my magazines are in &lt;br /&gt;
storage but the year was 2000-2004.]  Another recent CRSQ review was Gordon's 1878 book that mentioned USA Scriptural Geologist Martyn Payne.&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, Snoopy2, for your addition! I noted this fact, briefly in the article, in &amp;quot;The scriptural geologists&amp;quot; section. I knew that most of the Scriptural Geologists were British, and I did not have the time or knowledge of them to go into much more detail. Thanks for your help! Please remember to sign your posts in the future. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:06, 31 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== important message for you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I sent you an important message to the last place we communicated. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also have some good news for you. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:10, 13 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block duration ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your great blocks but they should generally not exceed 6 months in duration.  By then the IP address is typically being used by someone else.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:27, 27 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:OK. I will keep that in mind. I will change this vandal's block. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:46, 27 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Denkmal der Schande&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Björn Höcke nannte das Holocaust-Mahnmal ein &amp;quot;Denkmal der Schande&amp;quot;. Zudem sprach er von einer &amp;quot;dämlichen Bewältigungspolitik&amp;quot; und forderte eine &amp;quot;erinnerungspolitische Wende um 180 Grad&amp;quot;. Hinterher behauptete Höcke, er hätte den Holocaust als Schande bezeichnet. Wenn man sich nun seine Rede genau anschaut, kann er nur das Denkmal als Schande bezeichnet haben. Höcke hat offen NS-Gedankengut offenbart und dies auch gewollt. Er ist ein Agent des BRD-Systems, die zum Ziel haben, die AfD unwählbar zu machen. Dasselbe haben sie schon mit der NPD gemacht (in den 90er Jahren). Ich find's ja auch schade, dass die AfD unterwandert wurde und nicht mehr wählbar ist. Auch ich habe große Hoffnungen in sie gesetzt. Aber spätestens seit dem letzten Parteitag ist sie unwählbar, die Neo-Nazis gewannen die Oberhand, Gauland wurde Spitzenkandidat. Solange Petry keine neue Partei gründet, müssen Rechtschaffene bei der Bundestagswahl das geringste Übel wählen (z.B. die Freien Wähler oder die BüSo). Aber die AfD ist klar von NS-Agenten unterwandert und ich schrieb noch mehr in den Artikel, also lassen Sie mich zumindest Höckes Rede einfügen, dann kann sich jeder selber ein Bild machen. MfG --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 10:16, 1 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Grüetzi Elessar, CP ist ein Englisher website, so es ist besser wann wir in English schreiben. Ich denke dass die meisten leute heir sprechen kein Deutsch. Danke. Wass ich sage ist sehr kontrovers in Deutschland, aber, Ich probiere ein klares und gutes antwort zum geben:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:First off, many political parties have their crazy members. I know that UKIP explicitly disavows racism, but it has had some members who have said some silly things. I definitely do ''not'' believe the GOP in the U.S. is racist, but David Duke considers himself a Republican (and every other Republican disavows him). Even the Swiss People's Party in my country (I am also a U.S. citizen) has some members who have said racist things. Just because parties have members like this does not necessarily mean that the entire party is racist or whatever. In the case of Höcke's speech, Petry (the party leader, as you know) condemned what he said, or at least criticized him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Second, I know the mindset that the German have today. They are still ashamed for what they did during World War II, and they are still focused on trying to make restitution. Personally, I think it is good that they have repented, but they miss the fact that there are two extremes: one extreme is what the Nazis did, the other is being so ashamed bad things one did that they essentially hate their country. We see this with liberals in the United States. I think the German mindset is too far in the second extreme -- and no, I am anywhere close to being a racist or Nazi. Patriotism and nationalism can be very good things, as long as they are handled correctly and are not an excuse to persecute others. The German people, I think, are trying to extinguish them, and they have accused people, even those in the middle of those two extremes, as being Nazis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let me also make clear that I have not read much about Björn Höcke's speech, other than what you provided and what his English Wikipedia article states, so I cannot comment on his entire speech and his entire character. He may very well be what you say he is. However, what I read about his speech and about him actually seems reasonable. Many peoples all over the world have done many evil things -- slavery in the U.S. and the other European colonies, the Islamic slave trade, religious persecution in Rome and the communist nations, the several genocides in history, etc. However, it is not constructive for cultures to focus on these events. It is good to remember them and repent of them, but not to obsess about them. There is much more to German history than World War II, just as there is more to U.S. history than slavery. Why can't we build monuments celebrating the positive things about our cultures and our people? It is cultural suicide not to do so. While we should not forget the bad events, we should focus on the good events and remain proud as a people in order to remain strong. This seems to me what Höcke is getting at. Am I wrong?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reading his Wikipedia article, I came accross this quote: &amp;quot;Die Syrer, die zu uns kommen, haben immer noch Syrien. Wenn wir – durch die Syrer – unser Deutschland verloren haben, dann haben wir keine Heimat mehr.&amp;quot; I can see how in Germany this is very controversial, but I think in most other countries, this is quite reasonable. It may not be a bad thing if Syrians come, but it would mean that the German people would be in danger of disappearing, at least in a cultural sense. If someone values this (as most people of all ethnicies and nationalities do -- just ask the Poles or Hungarians), they will strongly oppose immigration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Am I wrong in what I am saying? Am I misrepresenting Höcke? I would appreciate some dialogue. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:18, 1 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::No, you aren't wrong and I too was never questioning that the &amp;quot;eternal fault&amp;quot; (electing Hitler/WW2) which is propagated by German liberals is bullshit. I only mean that Höcke was not only saying that, but he also clearly favorized the Holocaust by calling for an &amp;quot;erinnerungspolitische Wende um 180 Grad&amp;quot; and calling the Holocaust monument a &amp;quot;Denkmal der Schande&amp;quot;. This speech was much criticized by Jewish organizations in Germany and Höcke was forbidden to visit Concentration Camp Memorials. He's not a single exemption, but there are unfortunately already lots of neo-Nazis or neo-Nazi sympathizers in the AfD who are all defending Höcke's speech, including Spitzenkandidat Alexander Gauland. Party leader Petry was forced by them not to participate. These (real) neo-Nazis are system agents who are overrunning the AfD like they did decades ago with the NPD in order to make these parties uneligible by conservative voters. But of course many liberals call all ''real'' conservatives &amp;quot;neo-Nazis&amp;quot; which there is nonsense. But Höcke is really a neo-Nazi and anti-semite and should be excluded together with his inner-party defenders. --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 14:05, 1 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't understand how the &amp;quot;erinnerungspolitische Wende um 180 Grad&amp;quot; shows that Höcke is a neo-Nazi. It seems to be saying that German policy on these matters needs to change, which I also think is reasonable. The culture of shame in Germany must end -- when will Egypt build a monument mourning the Islamic slave trade, and when will Turkey build a monument mourning the Armenian Genocide? That's what I think he is saying. Am I wrong? Please explain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::While I am a strong supporter of Israel, I do think that many Jewish organizations in Europe and the United States are politically left-wing -- unlike the current Israeli government. The fact that they opposed Höcke's speech is unsurprising, even if he is not a neo-Nazi. Most European/American Jews support the ruling establishment's views on who is extreme and who is &amp;quot;moderate.&amp;quot; And besides, Jewish organizations have their own interests. It's reasonable for them to defend monuments mourning a genocide of their own people, regardless of whether having such a monument, or at least the mindset behind it, is a good thing or not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It seems to me that you are making a jump from noting what Höcke is saying to calling him a neo-Nazi. A lot of what he is saying seems reasonable, even if it is better that he watches what he says more closely, and I don't see how these comments make them neo-Nazis (I do see, however, how such comments are far outside the current German mainstream, and that they make such parties less attractive to moderate Germans). It seems to me that Höcke is a nationalist who is angry at the culture of shame in his country, which is probably the reason why it is being flooded with immigrants and weakened by the EU. Many conservatives said silly things (that sounded extremely racist) about Obama when he was U.S. President, even though those people would have voted for conservative blacks (Ben Carson, Allen West, Herman Cain) or Hispanics (Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz) in a heartbeat. Could it be that this is what Höcke is doing?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::My last thing I want to say in this comment is not related to the above. I would like to remind you that CP is a family-friendly encyclopedia, and I think this policy also applies to talk pages. I request that you thus refrain from spelling out cuss words when making comments. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:35, 1 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry about the term &amp;quot;b***&amp;quot; but I'm as angry as you about the &amp;quot;eternal fault&amp;quot; dogma. And you are completely right with most (including the Jews being too liberal in Europe), but in my opinion the quote &amp;quot;erinnerungspolitische Wende um 180 Grad&amp;quot; is like he wanted to say &amp;quot;The Holocaust was nothing bad&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;not so bad&amp;quot; or so. Like it would be Holocaust relativation. Maybe Höcke really didn't mean anything bad in his speech but then he's simply uncaring of what he says because he damages his party with such unclear statements. --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 16:34, 1 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As we disagree on his speech (even though I do think your last comment was very reasonable), I chose to move the info to another place in the article and re-word it. If you have any problems with how I re-worded it, we can discuss that as well. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:05, 1 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Björn Höcke said in whole this: &amp;quot;Wir Deutschen – und ich rede jetzt nicht von euch Patrioten, die sich hier heute versammelt haben – wir Deutschen, also unser Volk, sind das einzige Volk der Welt, das sich ein Denkmal der Schande in das Herz seiner Hauptstadt gepflanzt hat.&amp;quot; This means, not German patriots but the other Germans (liberals e.g.) have founded the Holocaust monument which he calls a Denkmal der Schande. Which means, according to him true German patriots wouldn't have built the Holocaust monument, which can be interpreted as he's pro-Holocaust. The same interpretation is open in his other quote &amp;quot;Wir brauchen eine erinnerungspolitische Wende um 180 Grad&amp;quot;. Maybe he didn't want to relativate the Holocaust but he should watch out what he says, especially if his party wants to enter a coalition. A coalition with establishment parties wouldn't be bad as long as the AfD maintains its goals and gets many of them into a government program. --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 01:37, 2 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I can see now how people think the speech was sympathizing with Nazis -- the Holocaust and WWII is a touchy topic, especially for Germans. However, I still see how what he is saying is reasonable. Turkey, for example, is not going to build a monument for the Armenian Genocide anytime soon, Russia is not going to build a monument for the many Baltic peoples they killed during WWII, and Japan is not going to build any monument for the millions of people they killed, including concentration camp prisoners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I do know that there are two AfD factions: one that has a goal of becoming a coalition party, and the other that wants to remain an anti-establishment party. Höcke is clearly part of the latter, while Petry is in the former. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:31, 2 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::The AfD can remain an anti-establishment party and anyway be part of a government coalition, like the Austrian [[FPÖ]] which also seeks being part in coalitions (and already is in two states) and remains loyal to all of its positions. --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 14:09, 2 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Fair enough, but you get the point: there are two factions in the party on the best way foreward for the party. One of them support coalition agreements and the other side is less pragmatic in this regard. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:23, 2 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brexit==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi - not sure why you changed my edits on the BREXIT page - I tried to provide an accurate account of what is happening and what is being reported by many news outlets --unsigned comment by HORSEMAN&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello &amp;quot;HORSEMAN&amp;quot;, I removed the info about the potential referendums because this was just speculation that died down. I also thought that some of your wording (such as the &amp;quot;full complexity and impacts of BREXIT become apparent&amp;quot; and by removing the mention of the EU being obstructionist) seemed to insert a left-of-center bias into the article. CP is a conservative encyclopedia, and we align firmly with Brexit and Euroskepticism. However, I will see if I can re-add some of your wording. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:31, 10 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Another problem is that for the part about the proposed payments and EU citizen rights, you did not provide sources. The existing info already had a source, and you changed the info while keeping the source. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:35, 10 August 2017 (EDT) &lt;br /&gt;
:::Hi Again, would this link suffice http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-17-2001_en.htm It is the definitive statement from the EU negotiating team and sets out the negotiating agenda. Thanks Horseman&lt;br /&gt;
::::You can definitely cite the source, but do you also have third party sources as well? I see nothing in the EU source about the monetary amount of the settlement. We prefer sources with conservative editorial stances. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:57, 10 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Is this syitable, I don't pay for Telegraph articles so only have this link. Thanks Horseman&lt;br /&gt;
::::::The Telegraph is one of numerous conservative news organizations. Besides, their non-commentary articles are free for viewing. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:13, 10 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Margaret Sanger]] revision that you undid==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi 1990'sguy,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a way to reword what I wrote in such a way that it could be considered &amp;quot;encyclopedic&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Bluedogdemocrat|Bluedogdemocrat]] ([[User talk:Bluedogdemocrat|talk]]) 22:59, 18 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You could write &amp;quot;Planned Parenthood eventually expanded to support the form of murder known as abortion.&amp;quot; Something like that. We should keep the wording encyclopedic, as this is not a blog or anything like that. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:05, 18 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: Block of TimJim ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about that, I wasn't aware you had already blocked TimJim when I blocked him, so I reset the block length back to that of your original block. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 22:45, 19 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article move request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi I'd be happy to move those articles you are requesting, but as you know, I cannot avoid the creation of redirects.  Let me know if you want this, but hopefully you can get it done the right way. It's also probably easier to ask for a move than a delete. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:43, 21 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I appreciate your offer, David, but I think it would be better if I keep it simple for Andy, rather than explain that the articles were moved and that he only has to delete the redirect -- having one person do it is more simple. Thanks anyway! :) --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:46, 21 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Agreed...okay.  I didn't want to cut in and disrupt things, but just thought I'd offer.  Cheers! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:49, 21 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I do appreciate your offer, David. Thanks! It looks like Andy just moved the articles. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:50, 21 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
You can email me at wirepaladin36@gmail.com [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:22, 26 August 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==snoopy2==&lt;br /&gt;
1990s guy, I just want to verify u could read the Theistic ev. entry and 1994 film clip on my user talk.  any comments?&lt;br /&gt;
:I could watch it, but would you please explain what it's about in a little more detail? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:55, 11 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Maybe I was too pessimistic. Good news ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Why [[Democrats]] Should Be''' Losing Sleep Over Generation Z.[https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashleystahl/2017/08/11/why-democrats-should-be-losing-sleep-over-generation-z/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bye for now. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:47, 5 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the article. Bye for now. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:48, 5 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== File comparison tool ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did Cons ever get back to you with the comparison tool?  I'm curious about it, and whether it does a good job of checking for copied content.  The problems that it appears to solve are different from the problems of comparison tools used in software development.  I'm curious about whether it uses line hashing, sentence hashing, word group hashing, and things like that.  I'd like to try it out, and not just at CP.  In fact, probably not at all for CP; I'm not interested in who plagiarizes what at CP, though, when I am, I use other techniques to catch people.  I'm just curious as to whether those other techniques have been automated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's puzzling that Cons deleted the screenshot, as though he ''wants'' people to believe he's a liar, though I don't think he is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 14:57, 12 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I can assure you that the tool exists. I have not tried it yet and thus cannot answer your question. I have no reason to try it as JDano's essays were deleted, so I recommend that you ask Conservative directly these things. Maybe he will share it with you. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:23, 12 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Great!!  I'm still very much interested in it.  Is it a &amp;quot;cloud app&amp;quot;?  Is it a downloadable app that I can run locally on my own computer?  Can you send me a URL?&lt;br /&gt;
::By the way, the standard wiki comparison of your last edit to the [[Guy Verhofstadt]] article, just as a random example, shows how bad text comparers can be.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 17:40, 13 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You are going to have to ask Conservative for the details of the tool -- he told me not to give it away to anyone, and while I personally have no problem with sharing it with you, I shouldn't go against what he said. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:43, 13 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well, this is really weird.  Cons seems to be trying to censor the internet itself, hiding the location of this tool.  And he seems to think that only you can be trusted with it.  He said &amp;quot;I will share this tool with 1990sguy [...] so he can evaluate your [JDano's] efforts in an objective way.&amp;quot;  I of course took this as a challenge.  A Google search for &amp;quot;similar page checker tool&amp;quot; gets a number of hits.  Ignoring the ones that cost a lot of money, and those that attempt to check a given page against the entire internet, narrowed it down to a few.  This one: [https://www.duplichecker.com/similar-page-checker.php] seems to be the right thing.  It's a &amp;quot;cloud app&amp;quot; rather than an installable program, but I can put up with that.  It has the same appearance&amp;amp;mdash;color and layout&amp;amp;mdash;as the screenshot that Cons posted and removed.  I ran it on the versions of this page before and after your recent reply to me, and it said they were 100% the same.  I'm not particularly happy about that, but the additional text was only about 0.3 percent of the total, so I suppose I can accept that.  Then I ran it on versions that differ in length by 10% (the 100K version and the 110K version.)  It said they were 98% similar.  Not good.  But I still might find it to be a useful tool.  There are pages not relating to JDano that could benefit from such an analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::I will probably check in with Cons on this, once he stays away from CP for 10 days.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 23:39, 13 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Getting help==&lt;br /&gt;
I am trying to fix the stuff on the Corporate bullies page.  Am still learning my way around on how to use things.   Think I am starting to get it though.   The Georgia 2016 stuff has a lot of info and I am in the process of editing it, though it's going to take a while (at least 20 or more minutes.  I'm trying though.  (BTW, if I wasn't supposed to edit here, sorry.  I don't know how to reply to your remark otherwise.) [[User:PatriotMongoose|PatriotMongoose]] ([[User talk:PatriotMongoose|talk]]) 22:31, 15 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's OK to edit here. I recommend that you read CP's guidelines, and probably more importantly, that you read [[Help:How to edit a website like Conservapedia]]. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:34, 15 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fabulous block and reverts==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fabulous block and reverts this afternoon!!!!  Well done!!!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 18:51, 21 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, Andy! :) --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:52, 21 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== re: JohnZ ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
User: JohnZ fails to recognize that my interest to be a referee to protect a marginal online sparring partner (whose greatest achievement was his dogged stubbornness to ignore facts/evidence)  was largely protected by his edits to main space articles and my desire for an online sparring partner. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His rudeness to other editors and his desire to barely skate by with his main space edits certainly did not help matters. In addition, given the [[decline of the atheist movement]] and it now being a hopeless cause destined to ever increasing irrelevance, my desire for an atheist online sparring partner is non-existent at this point given my current/future priorities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If he wants to create two quality, well-sourced original articles of at least 2,00 words on these topics [[Anti-religious Soviet Union propaganda]] and [[Christian persecution in communist China]] to restore his other editing privileges, that is what is required. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He would also have to pledge to refrain from hurling insults to other editors (idiot, etc.). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:01, 3 November 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Hopefully he'll do it. We've given him these opportunities before and he rejected them. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:18, 3 November 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I made a minor adjustment to his requirements for fully restoring his editing privileges in case someone creates articles on those subjects. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Secondly, ardent secular leftists generally always double down regardless of any contrary facts/evidence presented to them. Of course, you never know what is going to happen. The Apostle Paul went from being one of Christianity's chief opponents to being its greatest champion. He will just need to be open minded. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It is very widely recognized that there is and has been religious persecution in communist China and that there was anti-religious propaganda in the former Soviet Union. So I am giving him ample opportunity to show that he is not a close-minded individual given to hurling insults. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:31, 3 November 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would say no to this for a couple reasons. The first is his blatant disrespect of everyone here, and he has shown that multiple times. The gist of it is a pretense of superiority over us, as if it is mandatory that we listen to him; he stated a short time ago that some of us are idiots for not engaging him in conversation. Which I might add is his kind of conversation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second reason is that he's a leftist brand of liberal from Great Britain, which means we cannot change his way of thinking whatsoever. Unfortunately for someone who is that close-minded he is going to go into lock-step with every other like-minded individual in his country, which would mean the loss of the United Kingdom as a political entity within a few years time. In his case, he is more concerned with picking a fight with the users of a small American conservative website then he is with what he and his kind are allowing to happen in Britain, namely the Islamic takeover. As a leftist, he probably feels he can get along with them in the name of diversity and multiculturalism, but when all is said and done he will either be forced on his hands and knees with his butt high in the air, or he'll have his head chopped off.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, some people think they're so better than others that they've blinded themselves to what they're actually doing. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 04:35, 4 November 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Karajou, if you look at my comment to his talk page, you will see that I am giving him an opportunity to show that he can be open-minded and reasonable by writing on two topics related to atheistic communism persecution of Christians/religious (namely [[Christian persecution in communist China]] and [[Anti-religious propaganda in the Soviet Union]]) via two quality articles of at least 2,000 words.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:38, 4 November 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-Christian bias in Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello 1990'sguy. Am I being hypersensitive or is Wikipedia's anti-Christian bias increasing?  For example, the recent dispute about content at Answers in Genesis.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AAnswers_in_Genesis&amp;amp;type=revision&amp;amp;diff=810473662&amp;amp;oldid=810471171] I see also that User:Synthetic Woolly Mammoth[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Synthetic_Woolly_Mammoth] has just been blocked, allegedly for being a sockpuppet of Biscuittin, but more likely because he has been speaking up in support of some Christian editors. [[User:Desmonduk|Desmonduk]] ([[User talk:Desmonduk|talk]]) 05:27, 20 November 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I know another editor who has extensively edited topics related to Christianity and atheism on WP, and he told me that the ati-Christian bias on the site was much worse back around 2012. The militant atheists don't have as much power as they did back then. However, the anti-Christian bias obviously is still very bad, especially on YEC topics, which I have been dealing with for years already. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:20, 20 November 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block length ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for your alert block of new user &amp;quot;CPishilarious&amp;quot;, but I'm going to change the block duration from 2 years to 1 month.  Long blocks are disfavored on wikis because they block the IP address as well as the user.  The IP address could be a library or other general access IP address, or the user could move or be a college student, or the user could have a change of heart.  But thanks again for your quick action.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:11, 20 November 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, and you're welcome. I have seen blocked vandals come back with their same accounts after their blocks expire, so I wanted to protect against that. But I will shorten blocks like these in the future. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:54, 21 November 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks so much for your alert block this morning, but again the block duration is too long.  Another user could be trying to use that same IP address within a few months, or the user himself could have a change of heart.  I'll shorten it to 4 months.  Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 11:25, 4 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Andy, it feels like I'm the only editor you're messaging about block length, ''even though my blocks are much shorter than most other editors.'' For example, just yesterday, I blocked two accounts for six months for having a silly username and for (relatively) non-serious vandalism, but shortly later, DMorris reset the blocks for 5 years. See here: [http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Bernieman][http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Hillary_clinton] If you're going (for good reason) to message me for my blocks, please do the same for the other editors who prefer even longer blocks. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:33, 4 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::But yes, I will still shorten my blocks. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:36, 4 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suggested article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is an article suggestion:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump and evangelicals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think there would be public interest in such an article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:20, 9 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. If I get time, I will start this article. I will add it to my list of articles to create. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:16, 9 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Two things ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For one, why do you not have email enabled? Secondly, consider longer blocks for these obviously malicious accounts. You can block an account for infinity and the autoblock on the IP still only lasts 24 hours. There is no reason for these sleeper accounts to come back to life three months later. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 16:19, 13 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In his defense, he was doing longer blocks until [[User_talk:1990'sguy#Block_length|Andy started asking him not too]], then [[User_talk:1990'sguy#Block_length_2|reminded him again]]. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:25, 13 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, for crying out loud, why am I the only one being criticized for my block lengths? If I make my block lengths long, Andy posts on my talk page, and if I make my block lengths shorter, DMorris posts on my talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::DMorris, please talk to Andy about this. I will continue making my blocks on the shorter side until your differing opinions are sorted out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::About my email, I have my email address posted on my user page. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:46, 13 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Articles of the year: 2017 - your article is being featured on the main page (left side) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump achievements]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[European migrant crisis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheists and genetic mutations]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep up the good work.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:12, 24 December 2017 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nationalism v Globalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I went ahead and added a link to the Gardner article on the Nationalism v Globalism article for you.  I figured since we were referencing it, it would be good to see the original article too.--[[User:Whizkid|Whizkid]] ([[User talk:Whizkid|talk]]) 23:52, 7 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! I already saw and added it to other articles where I mentioned Gardner. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:53, 7 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Homeschooling==&lt;br /&gt;
I deleted the paragraph on Texas requirements (which I originally added) since it was duplicative of the information I added from HSLDA (which covers all 50 states) regarding state requirements.  I left the New Hampshire one since it involved a court imposing its will on a family in violation of state law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm glad you liked my original work, but after finding something better and covering more than just one state, I amended my original work.  Though after your comments, I revised it to explain that another state court (Texas) made homeschooling far easier than before.  [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 17:22, 29 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:27, 29 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Deep State==&lt;br /&gt;
I will agree with your removal of the word &amp;quot;theory&amp;quot;, but I did add the phrase &amp;quot;(or are believed to control)&amp;quot; because there are many conservative Christians who are not totally convinced that the deep state really exists.  I believe my edits will be a happy medium between those who hold to the deep state view and those who do not. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 15:11, 30 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I kept most of your &amp;quot;is believed/considered&amp;quot; wording (except for the first sentence, which is unnecessary as the first sentence already makes clear that &amp;quot;deep state&amp;quot; is a term and not necessarily reality. I found most of your other changes to be too wordy and unnecessary, so I reverted some of it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:04, 30 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I looked at your revisions and all you did was revert to your original article, with a few minor edits to try to convince me that you really took my suggestions into consideration.  Basically what you did to the article is like putting wood filler and new paint on a house with termite rot.  I've dealt with folks like you over on &amp;quot;the other site&amp;quot;, who think that once they write an article, it's perfect and can't accept any changes to it.  I'm not going to waste time with this one any more; clearly you're trying to espouse tinfoil hat conspiracy theory under the guise of &amp;quot;Christian conservatism&amp;quot;.  [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 09:22, 31 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Much of your changes involved inserting parenthetical notes, which I think made the article more bloated than it had to be. The &amp;quot;or are believed to control&amp;quot; phrase in the first sentence was simply unnecessary and overemphasized your disbelief in the deep state. The part about Wall Street was cited to a good research article, so I don't think we need the &amp;quot;is believed&amp;quot; language for that. But I will still see if I can incorporate more of your edits.&lt;br /&gt;
:::About the existence of the deep state, it and the drive for one-world government are things that should be common and uncontroversial knowledge -- but people (both supporters and detractors) &amp;quot;conspiracize&amp;quot; these things and that's how accusations of me wearing a tinfoil hat come about. Look at the evidence -- most of our society (except theologically conservative Christians, most of them probably being premillennialist) accept the Idea of Progress, adopted during the Enlightenment Era. They believe that humanity is progressing for the better, and that this will lead to a one-world utopia with world peace and freedom for humanity (read Kant, for example). Thus, they believe that national identity, subsidiarity, and national sovereignty are growing useless and antiquated and actually are impediments to this utopia. This flows into their policies -- advancing international organizations, taking away national sovereignty, etc. As for the deep state, just look at the whole DOJ/FBI stuff going on right now, or the fact that Republicans and Democrats hire administration personnel from the same group of organizations -- CFR, Trilateral, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The garbage that there is some secret conspiracy by liberals to take over the world, that their motives are malevolent, that they want to do evil, that this is a short-term project, and that the Illuminati is involved with all this -- this is all garbage perfectly fit for &amp;quot;the other site&amp;quot;. In reality, the drive for a one-world utopia is one of the fundamental philosophical views in our culture, and liberals openly see it as natural/normal/benign (and they're in it for the long haul). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:04, 31 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suggested Name Change for [[Christmas and Easter Catholic]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
I propose changing this to &amp;quot;Christmas and Easter Christian&amp;quot;, since the phenomenon of persons attending church on those days is by no means limited to Catholics. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 16:17, 30 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I disagree. I recommend that a separate article entitled &amp;quot;Christmas and Easter Christian&amp;quot; be created -- C&amp;amp;E Catholicism is a notable concept on its own right, enough to have its own article. I think an article on C&amp;amp;E Christianity in general would be a good addition. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:07, 30 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::What's the difference?  Both are the same phenomenon -- &amp;quot;so-called&amp;quot; Christian believers who attend only during those two holidays (or weddings and funerals).  The current article is fine, it just needs to be revised to not pick on one branch of Christianity.  [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 09:17, 31 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I've heard Roman Catholics specifically mentioned much more than other Christians when hearing about this &amp;quot;phenomenon.&amp;quot; But I will ask another editor of his opinion on this. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:32, 31 January 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Campaign promises==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The thought occurred to me that Wikipedia does not normally catalog campaign promises.(It never has, that I have seen)  Elections there follow a formula of &amp;quot;what did they actually do after getting elected&amp;quot; and election results - which is both boring and completely useless, because we have a big problem with people running for office one way and then governing another way.  This leaves a glaring hole of accountability with all of our politicians and it also offers us an opportunity to distinguish ourselves from Wikipedia.  What do you think about this?  I made a few changes [[Bruce Rauner|here]] as an example start.  [[User:Progressingamerica|Progressingamerica]] ([[User talk:Progressingamerica|talk]]) 15:00, 4 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think your suggestion is a great idea -- we have too many politicians who make really great promises during election campaigns, but they later act like they never even made those promises. When Rauner and his GOP primary opponent (Jeanne Ives) sat down with the ''Chicago Tribune'' editorial board a few days ago, Rauner said that he never promised he would veto a major pro-abortion bill that he ultimately signed (he actually explicitly promised he would multiple times).[http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/30/jeanne-ives-crushes-gop-gov-bruce-rauner-illinois-candidates-meet-first-time/][http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/31/conservative-jeanne-ives-rips-il-gov-bruce-rauner-abortion-flip-flop/]&lt;br /&gt;
:I can also think of Sen. Thom Tillis of NC who campaigned against amnesty in 2014 and is now advocating for a &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; amnesty bill (though it's inferior to the Goodlatte bill).&lt;br /&gt;
:I support your suggestion. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:11, 4 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FPÖ ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I just wanted to ask you why you have removed [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Freedom_Party_of_Austria&amp;amp;diff=1403167&amp;amp;oldid=1403166 my entry] on the article of the Freedom Party of Austria. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kreisky%E2%80%93Peter%E2%80%93Wiesenthal_affair Kreisky–Peter–Wiesenthal affair] is an important event in the history of this party that should not be discreeted.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 09:41, 7 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:First off, the info was inserted right in the middle of a paragraph discussing the FPO's ideological development and alliance with the SPO. Your info was out of place.&lt;br /&gt;
:Second, the info was unduly wordy. I am sick of seeing the media and leftists do everything in their power to tie right-wing conservative parties like the FPO to Nazi Germany, such as by unduly emphasizing those aspects of the parties and calling them &amp;quot;far-right&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;extreme right&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;ultra-right&amp;quot;, etc. By American conservative standards, these parties are actually quite moderate, and for those of us who realize that Nazism is a vastly overrated threat (placed alongside climate change by the Left), such parties have clearly moved away from their pasts.&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't want our articles to accept the left-wing narratives of these right-wing populist parties. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:50, 7 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, all the informations I have put in the article were confirmed with trustworthy sources. [[Simon Wiesenthal]] who accused the FPÖ leader Friedrich Peter of being part in a unit which committed massacres against jews, was himself a Conservative. Wiesenthal supported the (at that time very conservative) Austrian People's Party. So it is not easy to label his accusations as &amp;quot;left-wing narratives&amp;quot;. I am also pretty sure that the Conservative government of Israel does not spread &amp;quot;left-wing propaganda&amp;quot; if they criticize the party for its charged history. Instead of simply removing facts from the article, you might emphasize how the FPÖ moved away from its past.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 10:01, 7 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Israel is a Jewish state, so issues related to the Holocaust are sensitive to them. But as much as I support Israel and its right-wing government, Israel's position toward the FPO is irrational, and they are unduly obsessed with Nazism like Western Europe is. Israel's opinion on the FPO means very little because of the context -- it's easy to offend Israel on matters like this.&lt;br /&gt;
:::About Wiesenthal, I don't know anything about him, but him supporting the OVP does not mean much to me. If the party were &amp;quot;very conservative&amp;quot;, why did it support the EU, Maastricht Treaty, Schengen Agreement, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
:::And yes, these are the narratives promoted by the Left, the establishment, and the media. These are the same people who were comparing Donald Trump to Adolf Hitler during the election campaign and who tried to smear Breitbart News as anti-Semite (despite loads of evidence to the contrary), among many other cases. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:17, 7 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Just because these &amp;quot;narratives&amp;quot; are promoted by the Left it does not mean that they are wrong. I can ensure you that Simon Wiesenthal was never a supporter of left-wing policies. As I already told you it would be better to emphasize the current measures by Strache to reappraise the controversial history of this party instead of denying it.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 11:20, 8 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::They're wrong -- they overemphasize every small and petty incident related to parties like the FPO that allude to Nazi Germany. Their point in doing so is to make it seem like that if we elect these people/parties into power (including Donald Trump), we'll be repeating 1933 all over again and will usher in the end of freedom in Europe -- never mind that Germany is still enforcing the Nazi ban on homeschooling, or that many Western European countries have free speech restrictions even on topics like Islam and homosexuality, or etc. Conservapedia will not go along with the media -- we acknowledge that parties like the FPO are conservative and/or right-wing (not &amp;quot;far-right&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;neo-Nazi&amp;quot;) and the best choice in order to protect/expand freedom and protect European culture/patriotism. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:58, 8 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can you create this article: [[Donald Trump's major achievements]]? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:39, 9 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This seems like a good idea, and I will do it. I won't do it immediately, since I have a lot of other things to do, but I will create it soon. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:54, 9 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::OK. Thanks. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:18, 9 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm very sorry about the article. If it make you feel like a advertisement. However, everything that is state is true. Thank you for your understanding. Pleased assist by make any corrections. That you think is necessary. When your time is most convenient. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your brother in Christ,&lt;br /&gt;
Luke&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for your message, but the article I deleted is not acceptable for Conservapedia. There is nothing I can do to change that, unless you receive coverage from good sources (Breitbart, Fox, etc.). I'm keeping the other article for now, since it's one I can imagine keeping, but I'm discussing it with other editors to see what to ultimately do about it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:00, 21 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you add some categories to my page please? [[User:Willow Smith|Willow Smith]] ([[User talk:Willow Smith|talk]]) 11:26, 22 February 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Response to your complaints==&lt;br /&gt;
From what appears EVERY time someone creates a new page or edits an existing one:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Please note that all contributions to Conservapedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the real rule is &amp;quot;any contributions by Conservapedia administrators -- no matter how good, bad, or ugly they may be -- are fixed for all time and never to be altered&amp;quot;, then make that the rule.  But don't invite someone to improve things, then complain because they do.  [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 10:26, 6 March 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Your bolding does not improve things. Also, nobody reverted your turning pages into redirects -- it's just a good idea to let people know before making major unilateral changes. If your complaint is that I'm messaging you about these things, then you have no real complaint at all. If you make edits here, you (like I was, and still am to an extent) are bound to be messaged about these things, which other editors do with the intention of improving others' editing. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:37, 6 March 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Additionally, administrators and editors alike must watch the activity of others, especially newer editors.  A few people have the hobby of trying to vandalize CP in any way possible, so excuse us if we sound cynical or obstinate, but some &amp;quot;new users&amp;quot; are actually just the same vandals as always.  Since we don't really know you yet, we do our best to assume good intent, but can't afford to ignore what seems to be odd behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm sure you'll do fine, if you just listen to the recommendations of others and keep improving content.  Thank you for your efforts, and for understanding! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:16, 6 March 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thank you for the intro==&lt;br /&gt;
Just wanted to say thank you for the welcome!  PS--Do you know what an eagle does when a storm approaches?  [[User:Bcarlin|Bcarlin]] ([[User talk:Bcarlin|talk]]) 20:34, 21 March 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Double standard article is now unprotected ==&lt;br /&gt;
1990sguy, I unprotected the [[Double standard]] article.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:16, 3 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:43, 3 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Regarding the Whale article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to know what caused you to revert my edits to the Whale article, and what I could do in the future to avoid this.--[[User:Cetacean|Cetacean]] ([[User talk:Cetacean|talk]]) 23:23, 23 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:First off, I did not revert everything -- not even close. I reverted what appeared to be unnecessary wordiness on your part, along with your insertion of evolutionist-favored terms (&amp;quot;evolutionary biologists&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;evolutionists&amp;quot;--believe it or not, but people who believe in a young Earth can be evolutionary biologists too). If you keep your wording as concise as possible and if you choose your wording while keeping in mind that this is a conservative-Christian encyclopedia (thus, using terms favored by conservatives and Christians), then you won't be reverted. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:10, 23 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::OK, thanks for letting me know. I'll keep that in mind. I think I was correct about Darwin's views, though - could I reinstate that part?--[[User:Cetacean|Cetacean]] ([[User talk:Cetacean|talk]]) 23:23, 23 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fine, but only if you change that part. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:27, 23 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Done. Thank you!--[[User:Cetacean|Cetacean]] ([[User talk:Cetacean|talk]]) 23:40, 23 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks for your edits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for cleaning up the edits to [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]].  I was planning to do likewise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:13, 24 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome, happy to help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:15, 24 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ummm... how? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok... if not supernatural then how is evolution a folklore genre? I don't understand... Do you go to your doctor... Do you believe in evidence based medicine? If so, are you aware that many medicines and treatment methods are derived from experiment on animals... In your viewpoint why? If animals are COMPLETELY unrelated to us IN ANY WAY... then what is the point of experimenting and more importantly, why do those experiments help us develop pills and treatment of diseases? Why do the animals most close to us suffer from related diseases? Why do chimps suffer from HIV and not cockroaches? Just coincidence that our nearest relative is the one who suffers from problems more close to us? --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 00:01, 25 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Things for you to note ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok... thanks... I feel like there are a couple of things you have to know about potholer54... First, he DOES NOT discuss the political regulations on climate change (https://youtu.be/MTJQPyTVtNA?t=10) in other words, he maintains that political part of the debate (whether conservative or not) is NOT his business. Also, he has criticized leftists for blowing up the effects of climate change (he has frequently said that science does not support earth being destroyed by climate change since in history there have been higher CO2 levels)... these are the reasons why I felt that my wording was correct, but I will not start arguing. Do as you wish. I only ask that if you modify my article please try expanding it (there are enough stubs and short articles here), and cite sources. Even if the sources would not be considered legitimate (by other's standards), citing the sources makes the article look good. I see too many articles, where the writer goes on and on without citing a single source. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About evolution. I do NOT agree with everything here. But I understand your mission. And I understand that people here feel differently and it is NOT my mission to undermine your work. I simply add and create pages which I think Conservapedia lacks, and I try to write from neutral point of view (more experienced people can edit it to sound more conservative, I do not want to seem like a troll). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did as you commanded. I know the wiki that shall not be named is not welcome here, but I wanted people to have another way to contact me. Anyways, it is removed&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 19:09, 26 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Responded on your talk page. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:26, 26 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)Yes... there are several instances of him trying to take the politics out of it... I'll send them later&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2)When you say he &amp;quot;criticizes skepticism&amp;quot; as opposed to &amp;quot;denialism&amp;quot; the reader may have the impression that potholer is against being skeptical when in fact he is against what he considers to be denialsim... He is pro free speech, he welcomes questions, I have even spoken with him at length months ago. That is why I wrote what I wrote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3)That's ok. While my interests change very unpredictably and rapidly, recently I am more interested in history, pseudohistory and archaeology, pseudoarchaeology articles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4)I understand... I will obey. But just for curiosity, can I know where does that rule originate from? I have read the Guidelines and the Commandments and I did not see any mention of the site which calls itself that which it thinks Conservapedia is not? I do obey, and I respect, but just for interest, where is that rule documented and what is the purpose (since you seem to tolerate other anti-Conservapedia wikis like Lieberapedia) --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 20:48, 26 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Responded again on your talk page. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:31, 26 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::OK... Is there a way for me to add images (illustrations) to my articles? How do I do that and what is CP policy on that? Are google images, wiki images ok? --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 21:43, 26 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You can post requests at [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]]. User:DavidB4 usually uploads the requests. If the image has a license that allows us to use it, we can upload it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:53, 26 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocked me ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey...&lt;br /&gt;
1)I thought that the ban meant that I was actually banned, meaning the site would prevent me from editing, so when I saw that I could edit, I thought it was ok... I did not know that you meant I should stay away from those topics. I simply thought the article used to many words, so I made it simple and more encyclopedic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2)Your addition to my article is also written, don't get me wrong, a little too simply. I understand that editors here do not accept the scientific consensus on evolution, but at least you can write it more encyclopedically, like you state that scientists say that humans turned from dumb to intelligent and turned to farmers... That sounds like something a 12 year old would write... Can't you make it sound more scientific. I mean, disagree with it, but at least a)represent it correctly b)write it in a grown-up manner...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3)Why did you delete my &amp;quot;Gay Nazis&amp;quot; article... From what I understand, that is pseudo historical and Hitler hated gays and persecuted them?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, thanks for a reasonable block time... I thought I might be blocked for another two years without a chance to explain myself --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 18:26, 27 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:1) Topic bans mean you're not allowed to edit a topic, not that you don't have the ability to do so. Besides, regardless of your apparent misunderstanding, you removed content that you disagreed with, something I told you repeatedly not to do.&lt;br /&gt;
:2) Disapproving of my wording isn't a good reason to remove the entire thing, especially considering that it is one of the few examples in the article that secularists hate. Besides, we're supposed to give reasonably simple explanations when writing (see [[Conservapedia:Guidelines#Style]]). My explanation is what the &amp;quot;scientific/historical consensus&amp;quot; essentially holds, and if that's the case, there's no reason to make it read like it was copied out of a prestigious journal. But regardless, I will see if there's any wording that I could change.&lt;br /&gt;
:3) It cited two explicitly left-wing sources that use this example to advocate for social-leftist policies and to criticize modern American conservatives. Surely there must be more apolitical sources out there about this? Also, regardless, it's good not to confuse Adolf Hitler's opposition to homosexuality (and the policies that came out of that) with homosexuality's presence in the Nazi Party. What I mean is that some high-ranking people in the Nazi Party, who helped found and build up the party (most notably Ernst Röhm), were homosexuals, and it's more complicated than &amp;quot;Nazis hated homosexuals.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:4) You're welcome. But also a warning: if you don't improve (and I hope you do improve), I will progressively increase the block lengths. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:55, 27 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok, fine... But out of curiosity, does everyone on this site share your views on evolution, black holes, relativity, atheists etc? Is this site representative of Conservative (and/or Christian) values in general or a very specific type of sense? Do mainstream conservatives reference this site as an authority? And also, is there a rule (formal) where this has to be YEC or strictly Christian? Or is it an unspoken rule? Or does it depend on editors? I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes, I am genuinely interested. One more thing, you told me that I could NOT become an admin/sysop because there were very few, yet you clearly have more authority than me. You block and unblock me at will... How can I get that authority? Thanks! --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 23:39, 27 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::No, not everyone shares CP's views on these issues -- in fact, we've had some liberals and atheists edit CP on relatively good terms. However, most editors here (including myself, though I'm agnostic on the relativity info and opposed to the CBP) share the vast majority of CP's stated views. As the owner of CP, Andy obviously has the right to choose what it says.&lt;br /&gt;
:::CP is representative of, for lack of a better term, what I would call &amp;quot;full conservatism&amp;quot;, rather than cafeteria conservatism, where people pick and choose what parts of conservatism they support and what they don't. There are many people (especially in Europe, but also here) who say they are conservative but share many views and even many underlying presuppositions of the globalist Left. CP is pretty consistent with our support for limited/small government and staying true to the values of the founding fathers.&lt;br /&gt;
:::It really depends on who you mean when you say &amp;quot;mainstream conservative&amp;quot; -- that's a slippery term that can mean different things.&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not an admin -- I'm technically an assistant admin, since I have many but not all sysop rights. Even getting those took a while, and it's all at Andy's discretion. If you become a good editor who respects CP's perspective and does not challenge them in any way, you'll probably get some rights eventually. But you were just blocked twice, and you're still having problems learning how to edit CP without undermining its perspective -- I don't think you should count on being promoted anytime soon -- focus on other things here for now. CP has a significantly stricter sysop policy than &amp;quot;the other website&amp;quot;, and for good reason -- we're the target of parodists and other people who regularly seek to vandalize and undermine us, and we want to ensure that we don't have to deal with a parodist sysop or anything like that. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 00:09, 28 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sorry ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, you'll have to explain that more... What do I not do? --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 15:58, 28 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Left Wing Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi... I do not usually look at the political leanings... I cite sources which I am SURE state something that is verifiable... Though, SPLC might be left leaning, I am SURE they can get Richard Spencer's birth date right... So I cited as a source for his birth date... The RWW, was a YOUTUBE video, that is the one I found first, I don't cite them to support left leaning politics, just facts that are verifiable by ANY honest person... I repeat SPLC might be left, but I am sure they can get a BIRTH DATE correctly! So that is what I cited, but do as you please! --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 16:22, 28 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Surely, there are better sources that give Spencer's birthdate than SPLC. Also, those sources are not merely &amp;quot;left-leaning&amp;quot; (that designation more properly belongs to something like &amp;quot;The Atlantic&amp;quot;) -- they are far-left partisan interest groups. They have no business being here. As a conservative encyclopedia, it makes sense to predominantly rely on conservative sources (or, at least, apolitical sources). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:27, 28 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arguing With You ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lol.. You are trying to get me to argue about evolution... but the problem is that if I do that I (and ONLY I, ie NOT both of us) will get blocked... It's kinda dirty that you on one hand basically provoke me to argument and if I do respond to your arguments you have the authority to block me... Assuming, this time you really were interested and WILL NOT block me for simply RESPONDING TO WHAT YOU TOLD ME... It is my humble opinion, based on what you have said here, you do not understand what The Theory of Evolution actually is... You seem to think that evolution says that monkeys turned human and that macro evolution means that a new organism appears over time, although macro evolution is THE SAME as micro evolution only on a larger time scale (yes as simple as that)... You have made it clear NOT to correct these errors (ERRORS) so I respect conservapedia rules... I respect what you told me and I keep away from stuff that we disagree on and keep contributing what I can in good faith...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last time we got into this argument, I pointed out a really good and simple thing... I told you how we can see the familial pattern and the animals closer to us suffer more ailments like us... I also pointed out that experiments on animals closer to us help us find treatment, this was a good point to think about... Instead you chose to ignore it... So I did NOT want to get blocked, so I simply let it go (again, respecting your opinions)... Yet you show NONE of this respect calling 200 years of research &amp;quot;junk science&amp;quot; simply because you have been unable to process this information... @Karajou is YEC too and he thinks that evolution is fake, but he does not push it, and he is not calling me out on &amp;quot;believing&amp;quot; (or understanding, as I prefer) evolution... He simply keeps what he believes to himself... I can respect that! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am ready to respond if you have questions... But only if I am guaranteed not to get blocked like last time (after I RESPONDED to QUESTIONS addressed to me FOR 2 years)! --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 20:40, 30 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:On a side note, I happen to know of a CP user who openly created a RW account.  They were immediately interrogated on evolution as well. &lt;br /&gt;
:To the main issue, though, microevolution is not the same as macroevolution.  You should really do some research on the subject. There is a significant difference between a change in fur length, and a change in species. That and other issues I disagree with you aside, I don't think you will or should get blocked simply for stating your opinion.  As long as you continue to respect our polices regarding mainspace articles, you should be safe.  (I don't know the details of the block, but I suspect there was more going on than just an angry response to your opposing opinion.) &lt;br /&gt;
:Anyway, I'm cutting in on this conversation, and I should really just let 1990'sguy speak for himself. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:00, 30 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::@Kingdamian1: I am '''not''' trying to argue with you about evolution. First off, I explicitly tried to end the discussion on Andy's talk page because I didn't want to use it arguing about political positions. Also, I was more focused on your political positions. We all know what you believe on evolution. I was tempted to ask clarifying questions about your ''political'' views, but I thought it wasn't worth it.&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I actually don't care whether you believe in evolution. What I care about is the fact that you are apparently unable to put away your bias when editing CP. Your edits on the [[Potholer54]], [[Pseudohistory]], and [[Macroevolution]] inserted pro-evolution bias into CP (and keep in mind that your first edit after joining was creating a debate page on evolution where the first sentence insulted CP). As I noted elsewhere, you inserted bias on other topics in your edits. I don't care about your personal views on any of this (there are several CP users who believe in evolution) -- the fact that you are struggling to make your editing compatible with CP's point of view is a problem. Hopefully, you're learning.&lt;br /&gt;
::Claiming that I'm &amp;quot;''unable to process this information''&amp;quot; on evolution shows how little you actually know about me, and it's not a good strategy for staying on this site. I've thought a lot about this issue, and its strengthened my belief that the Bible is authoritative in all it says and that science affirms it as true (rather than Ephesians 6:14).&lt;br /&gt;
::DavidB4's comment above is correct, and to clarify to him, Kingdamian1 was blocked (by Karajou and me) for more than simply giving an opposing opinion. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:18, 30 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I CLEARLY have it on my page that I am a LIBERTARIAN... according to Conservapedia, that is what you would consider conservative, you keep telling me I admitted I was NOT conservative, where Conservapedia COUNTS Libertarianism as conservative... About evolution, I do NOT think you do not think about the subject, I think you look at it FROM A SINGLE point of view. I suspect that your view about evolution comes from strictly YEC... The first of your many mistakes, is saying that evolution=atheism, when in fact, OVERWHELMING MAJORITY of religious people agree with evolution. If you really are honest and interest in BOTH sides and NOT JUST ONE... there are MANY videos you can watch... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have these 2 videos I usually recommend as they are NOT boring and fun and also explain things in easy to understand terms... &lt;br /&gt;
If you are truly interested in BOTH sides, try to seat through these two videos. Watch them in order (1st and then 2nd) as one is kind of answering the rebuttal that followed (the rebuttal you may have in mind when watching the first one)... If you can sit through both of them calmly without getting agitated (They are NOT boring and easy to understand, filled with humor), please, get back to me and tell me (after watching BOTH completely) how has your view changed about what evolution actually is!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RnygS7opCA&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-ilMYc5xdQ&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 23:59, 30 April 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:KingDamian, you are bringing back an argument that has been refuted again and again and again.  I've seen the videos you posted, and all it does is once more post an assumption that we must accept evolution as true based upon the word of a scientist who said so.  So I'm going to ask you once, and I expect a straight up or down YES or NO answer, and it's based on the horse line at the end of video 2: DID YOU PHYSICALLY SEE THE ''EOHIPPUS'' CHANGE INTO THE ''EQUUS''?  Keep in mind that I will not accept as an answer anyone pointing to the fossils themselves and saying we must assume a change took place. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 00:21, 1 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Hi... No I have not seen it... But do you realize that if I had that would be THE SINGLE MOST POTENT evidence against evolution? Do you realize that? If I had actually observed the change that would be the single best evidence against evolution NOT for it... AGAINST IT! Do I make myself clear? --[[User:Kingdamian1|Kingdamian1]] ([[User talk:Kingdamian1|talk]]) 00:26, 1 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And there you go.  You haven't seen it happen.  And neither has every single scientist who ever lived; they didn't see it happen either.  And we have to sit here and take their word - and your's, I might add - that evolution did take place because they eyeballed a bunch of fossils and ''said'' a change took place?  We have to ''assume'' the change happened because these guys put these fossils in a nice little line-up?  This website will not accept evolution based on hearsay evidence; we will call evolution what it actually is - JUNK SCIENCE; and we will post direct evidence that contradicts what these supporters say about it.  Do I make myself clear?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 00:49, 1 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not here to argue... I like CP... I think you are worthy of a response, so please don't block me, Brian. Evolution has not been observed? Did you watch it from beginning to end? Evolution Has been observed... What you asked me was if we had observed a SPECIFIC species change over millions of years with my eyes... no I have not. But I have not observed ancient English evolve into modern english either, i have not observed Latin change into Italian either... and you have not observed George Washington s life... so according to your logic, all of this must be junk science too Kingdamian1 (talk) 02:30, 1 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, evolution has not been observed; you are arguing, and you have been arguing since day one, when you know full well where we stand on the subject.  It's stopping now.  And I'm not going to stand for someone who demands we look at pretty pictures just to get us to believe in an assumption; we might as well assume a monkey evolved from a living room wall because Little Billy drew one on it with his crayons.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 07:18, 1 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I agree with Karajou and DavidB4 (on his own talk page). Kingdamian1, your comments show you think I'm some &amp;quot;low-information&amp;quot; person who lives in a bubble who will immediately change my mind once I'm &amp;quot;enlightened&amp;quot; (emphasis on the scare quotes) -- your assumption is complete BS (it shows you have no clue who I am). I tried to end a discussion on Andy's talk page and you brought it up again on my talk page (and I didn't even have to be present for it to heat up). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:32, 1 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, I just saw [http://www.psypost.org/2018/04/scientific-reasoning-ability-not-predict-acceptance-evolution-among-religious-individuals-study-finds-51082 this study published in a scientific journal] (by evolutionists, with an evolutionist perspective) that admits that there's no correlation between one's level of education or intelligence and their acceptance of evolution. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:21, 1 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Here's a link to an article responding to the &amp;quot;You don't understand real evolution&amp;quot; argument: [https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2015/09/24/do-we-have-misconceptions-about-evolution/] AiG Also has many articles on the many &amp;quot;proofs&amp;quot; of Evolution that have been used ad Nauseum to attack creationism, such as this one about bacteria: [https://answersingenesis.org/natural-selection/antibiotic-resistance/is-antibiotic-resistance-proof-of-evolution/] Here's and article explaining why the changes that are actually observed are not even really &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot;: [https://answersingenesis.org/natural-selection/is-natural-selection-the-same-thing-as-evolution/] And here's a comprehensive list of some of the most common attacks against Creationist assertions: [http://creationwiki.org/Index_to_Creationist_Claims_(Talk.Origins)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The thing is, Creationists are very well aware of the weapons used against them by Evolutionists and one of the biggest mistakes evolutionists make is assuming that Evolutionists know some critical piece of information that is a &amp;quot;knockout punch&amp;quot; to Creationism, when in reality, Creationists are very well aware of these assertions and have written many articles responding to them. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 23:55, 20 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more thing. As Frank Turek, one of the foremost Christian apologists, says &amp;quot;Science doesn't say anything, scientists do.&amp;quot; Whenever anyone says &amp;quot;Science says that...&amp;quot; what it should really be is &amp;quot;based on their interpretations of certain observations, scientists conclude...&amp;quot; When people say &amp;quot;Science says...&amp;quot; they are committing the fallacy of reification. A detailed explanation can be found here: [https://answersingenesis.org/logic/the-fallacy-of-reification/] Despite KingDamian1's claims that he is &amp;quot;not trolling&amp;quot; he has carried a rather rude and condescending tone typical of those who attack Creationism. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 13:16, 21 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As User:Kingdamian1 is a new user, I feel like he/she should given another chance, rather than indeffed. After all, he/she seems really interested in improving Conservapedia and creating articles here, as evidenced from his/her multiple comments even on Wikipedia, requesting his unblock and his/her desire to change. Would there be any objections to me unblocking him/her, with him/her understanding that he/she is topic-banned from any science-related articles (since this seems to be the reason other editors are upset with him/her)? I hope this helps. With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:07, 23 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::We gave him a chance, and he had more than NPOV problems (which were in and of themselves annoying, since it was my role to check his articles). I was really annoyed at his expectation that he could be instantly promoted to adminship status (and his apparent desperation at it, since he messaged several editors several times about it), when it is very hard and takes a long time even to become an assistant admin. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:35, 23 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How do you ping someone? (i responded to you on my talk page) [[User:Qw23|Qw23]] ([[User talk:Qw23|talk]]) 17:21, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think CP has a ping option. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:23, 8 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm new to this project and I do need help with this sentence:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quote|[[Mike Pompeo]] and the Trump administration helped secure the release of Kim Dong Chul, Kim Hak Song and Tony Kim from North Korea.{{cite news|author=Andrew O'Reilly|coauthors=Elizabeth Llorente|title=Trump administration finds success in bringing home detained Americans|url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/05/09/trump-administration-finds-success-in-bringing-home-detained-americans.html|work=[[Associated Press (AP)|Associated Press]]|publisher=[[Fox News Channel|Fox News]]|date=9 May 2018}} The three men described their “deep appreciation” for the Trump administration for help freeing them.{{Cite news|last=Dorell|first=Oren|title='God Bless America': Freed American prisoners thankful after being released from North Korea|url=https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/05/09/north-korea-kim-jong-un-free-3-american-citizens/582094002/|publisher=[[USA Today]]|date=9 May 2018|accessdate=10 May 2018|quote=We thank God, and all our families and friends who prayed for us and for our return}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe it should go under [[Donald Trump achievements: Foreign policy]] but for 2018, which section do you believe it fits best under? Also, how do sources work here? --[[User:MaddieJ|MaddieJ]] ([[User talk:MaddieJ|talk]]) 15:14, 11 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I already added this to the article, but I will look through your sources to see if more can be added. References could be surrounded by ref tags, like this : &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[citation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:29, 11 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hi [[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] I just want to let you know I'm glad I'm learning how to edit here. I just recently added the ISIS statements on [[Justin Trudeau]] and also mentioned [[Maxime Waters]] on this edit [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=2017_left-wing_violence&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1422057]. I will allow you to monitor me if any edit I do is good or bad, and I will message you if I need anything. Regards.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:MaddieJ|MaddieJ]] ([[User talk:MaddieJ|talk]]) 10:03, 15 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, thanks. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:01, 15 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A Message for that British Troll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just in case (s)he makes another sock account, (s)he should know that campaign finance laws are unfair and D'Souza was directly targeted because of his unpopular opinions. Also, in the case of Roy Moore, there is only accusations and hearsay. That troll must also ignore the things that Leftist politicians did:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bill Clinton: raped, molested and abused several women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton: Deflected responsibility for Bengazi, kept emails on her own private servers illegally, and covered up her husband's illicit affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I'm sure you could name more. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 09:21, 24 June 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia's Opinion on Joseph McCarthy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that you reverted my edit to the Joseph McCarthy page. I made the edit to align with the views expressed in a news story I saw in the main page that described McCarthy as &amp;quot;two of a kind&amp;quot; with Robert Mueller. I feel that Conservapedia should be consistent, so I would appreciate it if the news story was removed/replaced, or the McCarthy article was changed.--[[User:Cetacean|Cetacean]] ([[User talk:Cetacean|talk]]) 18:35, 16 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I added sources from a reliable conservative source backing up the article. Besides, the sentence as it is now is more neutrally-worded than your wording (I think even the person who posted the news blurb could agree with it). Bottom line: the article is fine, but it's not worth fighting what is a good analogy (considering that we have many leftist readers who hate McCarthy) on the news feed. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:48, 16 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== About draft ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just replied to your email. Its for here, not for Wikipedia. --MaddieJ 14:45, 18 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Brian and Ed Krassenstein]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I created the article [[Brian and Ed Krassenstein]]. If you would like to do improvements and better grammar to it, feel free to do so. --[[User:MaddieJ|MaddieJ]] ([[User talk:MaddieJ|talk]]) 14:38, 20 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama's achievements ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: [[Essay: President Barack Obama's achievements]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It required a lot less work than your article [[Donald Trump achievements]]. :)[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:59, 29 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ha! And the little that Obama actually did is being wiped away by President Trump right as we speak! :) --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:22, 29 May 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Finland==&lt;br /&gt;
I didnt find a way to send a message here so i assume, once its a wiki, that im supposed to edit this page when i want to contact you. Im not sure if i comment on the articles talk page, would it inform you?&lt;br /&gt;
I wanted to ask you about your edits of Finland's article, noticed few grammar mistakes that you corrected but didnt get why the day of independence cant be on the page? Then wanted to mention hat the the Lapps is a same name as Sami, so its like mention the same ethnic group twice. &lt;br /&gt;
Then i wondered why the population of the capital city shouldnt be mentioned?&lt;br /&gt;
The name of party Perussuomalaiset is in english &amp;quot;the Finns Party&amp;quot; not &amp;quot;True Finns&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
There is also few smaller issues i will come back to them later. So would be nice to have a talk about these. Thanks. -Karjalainen&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:First off, thank you for editing, and for messaging me here! The problem with the date of independence is that the infobox does not have a parameter (at least that I'm aware of) for the date of independence. This means that if you add the date of independence like what you did, the infobox will not actually show it to whoever is reading.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was not aware that the Lapps and Sami are the same. I will fix this. I will also fix the part about the Finns Party, since you're also right on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I just didn't think it was necessary to list the population of Helsinki, especially since the population keeps changing and few editors are available to change it. But, if you want to add the population on the [[Helsinki]] article, you are free to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I noticed that you updated the economic information using Euros, rather than dollars. The reason why I changed it back is that most Conservapedia readers live in the United States, and the dollar is obviously what they use (and they probably don't know the exchange rate). We can mention the numbers in Euros, but we should also use dollars. Since I don't know the exchange rate, I did not add both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope all this helps! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:05, 22 July 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for answering.&lt;br /&gt;
I dont know if this info can be found but is CP based on the MediaWiki platfom? If yes, is it being updated when never versions come out?&lt;br /&gt;
Scrolling around some tutorial pages i found a template of countries where i took that &amp;quot;established&amp;quot; tag from, why does it exist if it doesnt show?&lt;br /&gt;
How do you edit the sources? I wanted to add but i dont see the other sources listed there?&lt;br /&gt;
Is there any plans to add to CP also other languages?&lt;br /&gt;
Is there a way to add both mi2/km2 or $/€ ? Would be nice to attrack also non-american readers and make this website even bigger and popular, maybe one day to replace wikipedia as the biggest.&lt;br /&gt;
I will write the issues concerning Finland on the talk page of Finland, please refer to there. -Karjalainen&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry for the belated response. CP is based on the MediaWiki platform, but we use a different infobox than Wikipedia -- we didn't just copy and paste their infobox. We do update it, but I don't know how often.&lt;br /&gt;
:You can add sources by putting them in in between a tag like this &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[source]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:There are no plans to make CP in a different language that I am aware of, but I recommend asking Andy Schlafly, the site's owner here: [[User talk:Aschlafly]].&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, I do not know how to add both mi2/km2 or $/€ to the infobox.&lt;br /&gt;
:I will take a look at your message on the Finland talk page. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:23, 26 July 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Five solas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hearty thanks, 1990'sguy, for your assist with [[Five Solas]]! --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 14:44, 29 July 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:24, 29 July 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== requested article: Trumponomics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Article request: [[Trumponomics]]. It would be a nice complementary article to our [[Obamunism]] article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:40, 5 August 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll see what I can do. The [[Donald Trump achievements: Economic policy and labor]] (along with the trade sub-article) give a pretty good overview of his economic policies and the effects of those policies. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:48, 5 August 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contact==&lt;br /&gt;
I don't have yours, either. Use this: nobs315@gmail.com [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:07, 15 August 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Mine is on my user page. You can verify there. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:18, 15 August 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Capital Punishment==&lt;br /&gt;
By quoting Genesis 9:5 you are confusing what God is permitted to do versus what man may do and how man is to conduct himself in relation to his fellow man.  It is also inaccurate to write that Jesus had nothing to say on the subject of capital punishment when he directly called into question the teaching of &amp;quot;eye for an eye.&amp;quot;[[User:Tulip Festival|Tulip Festival]] ([[User talk:Tulip Festival|talk]]) 19:02, 17 August 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, Genesis 9:5-6 clearly says that the just punishment for taking a human life is that one's own life be taken. The proportionate and just punishment for murder is not jail time, nor community service. You're confusing what the Bible says regarding personal conduct and governmental policy, which is not personal. I recommend you read these two links: [https://www.gotquestions.org/death-penalty.html][https://answersingenesis.org/culture/the-death-penalty-wdjb-not-wwjd/] --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:15, 17 August 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HTTP --&amp;gt;HTTPS update ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you probably saw, I have moved this list to: [[User:DavidB4-bot/HTTPS URL update project]].  Thank you for your additions to the list...my apologies for adding your entries to the new page under may name. I hope you don't mind.  Please feel free to continue adding to that list. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:45, 10 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, and thanks for creating this list! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:49, 10 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== i try ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than a single sentence? Okay I can try. [[User:Knockforpeace|Knockforpeace]] ([[User talk:Knockforpeace|talk]]) 19:29, 15 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry i have a disorder. I will try to add more. [[User:Knockforpeace|Knockforpeace]] ([[User talk:Knockforpeace|talk]]) 19:39, 15 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::See [[Conservapedia:How to create and maintain high-quality articles]] --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:41, 15 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Tutoring avalible? By you? [[User:Knockforpeace|Knockforpeace]] ([[User talk:Knockforpeace|talk]]) 19:45, 15 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Read and follow all of the links provided at the very top of this talk page. That will help you. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:09, 15 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Logician account ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It wasn’t a troll. Could you unblock it? Also, I removed Russell and Whitehead’s &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Principia Mathematica&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; because it’s supposedly recommended reading. Thing is though that it’s such dense and complicated symbolic logic that no one would actually be able to understand it. It shouldn’t be recommended reading. Anyway, thanks. [[User:Anaxagoras|Anaxagoras]] ([[User talk:Anaxagoras|talk]]) 12:36, 20 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I will unblock the account (though I will procedurally block the &amp;quot;Anaxagoras&amp;quot; one), but do not remove the Principia Mathematica book. It may be dense and complicated, and it may be to the extent that laypeople can't understand it, but it should remain for those who can understand it and who will find it useful. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:50, 20 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: [[Kavanaugh smear]] article name change ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A high proportion of CP's readers lean left. I changed the title because I thought the new title would engender less cognitive resistance to these readers and therefore be more likely to change their mind. In addition, I thought the new title sounded more encyclopedic.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:01, 23 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's understandable, but the article is not about opposition to Kavanaugh in general, it's specifically about the accusations made against him by left-wing people (as opposed to people criticizing him with his judicial philosophy being the stated reason). I'm not opposed to the page being moved, but it would be a title that makes it clear that the article is specifically about the attempted rape allegations against him. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:37, 23 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The allegations against him are a joke. It is a reflection that the Democrats are a sad joke. All the corroborating witnesses say the events never happened.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:14, 24 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Exactly -- they're politically-motivated character assassination, nothing more. Thus, &amp;quot;Kavanaugh smear&amp;quot; is an appropriate title for the article. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:24, 24 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have chimed in [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Kavanaugh_smear&amp;amp;curid=150814&amp;amp;diff=1450439&amp;amp;oldid=1450438 here]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:28, 24 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re: Switzerland vs. Britain ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe you have visited Switzerland. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a post I made to some left leaning atheists/evolutionists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gentlemen,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't think I haven't noticed your silence on Swiss trains being more timelier than British trains. What's your excuse for British trains being less timelier than Swiss trains? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just admit it. The [http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/06/switzerland-beacon-of-european.html industrious and wealthy Swiss], who have one of the highest rates of creationism in Europe, have a better, wealthier and more efficient society than post Darwinism Britain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, deny that Britain is the fountainhead of Darwinism and lose all credibility!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Main page right post in question ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The British recently had a hard''' time getting their trains to run on time.[https://www.bbc.com/news/business-45572736]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Wikipedia]], &amp;quot;The Swiss rail network is noteworthy for its density, its coordination between services, its integration with other modes of transport, timeliness and a thriving domestic and trans-alp freight system.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why can't [[Britain]], the fountainhead of [[Darwinism]], compete with [[Switzerland]] which is known for having one of the highest rates of [[creationism]] [[per capita]] in Europe?[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/06/switzerland-beacon-of-european.html][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:01, 23 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have dual Swiss citizenship, so yes, I have visited the country multiple times. For the record, some (not many, though) of my relatives there are biblical creationists. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:37, 23 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Formatting of quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the {{tl|cquote}} thing - I had forgotten that template. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:15, 26 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome -- happy to help! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:21, 26 September 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trumpiantexan is a vandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There's a Vandal called &amp;quot;Trumpiantexan&amp;quot; [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 18:53, 16 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why you said this so.. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...'' I don't know if his pro-Marx comments actually make him a communist. He's your typical globalist/liberal European uniparty elite.'' It is not mine definition but more a true fact. Regards, [[User:YortKeldher|YortKeldher]] ([[User talk:YortKeldher|talk]]) 11:15, 20 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Most liberal/globalist European elites think the same way Juncker does. It would not be a good idea to label them all as communists. They have many of the same goals as communists, but there is some nuance between them (for example, different different tactics/methods, and Juncker and many of his friends are part of &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;center-right&amp;quot; parties, and seem to like big corporations). Either the &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;globalist&amp;quot; categories are enough (since liberals and globalists have many similarities with Marxists, like Juncker), or a new category is needed. I prefer the former, as it doesn't imply that liberalism and globalism are too different from Marxism and communism (different strands of the same thing, and the existing categories take the nuances into account). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:00, 20 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cesar Sayoc Article==&lt;br /&gt;
Wouldn’t a person with prudent ethics be willing to discuss whether or not a new article should be deleted prior to deleting said article? Cesar Sayoc is dominating the headlines of America yet you say he is a ‘nobody’? Based on your reasoning the [[Lee Harvey Oswald]] article should be deleted immediately.--[[User:JLind|JLind]] ([[User talk:JLind|talk]]) 17:01, 26 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Lee Harvey Oswald has historical significance -- and fortunately, we get the facts right, that he was a left-wing Marxist (a fact many on the Left like to ignore). The Cesar Sayoc guy may be dominating headlines (of the left-wing mainstream media and the Left, which want to capitalize on this single incident of a mentally ill man and put a rug over the [[Left-wing violence in the Trump era|many examples of leftist violence in the past couple years]]) at the moment, but his 15 minutes of fame will soon end and his 58-year jail sentence will soon begin. I let the other administrators know of the dispute over this page, and they will decide soon. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:08, 26 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I got the facts right in the Sayoc article, I hope you are not implying otherwise. I’d like to think the Best of the Public could create an article free from liberal bias. Alas, it looks like the readers of Conservapedia will have to suffice with the liberal slant since you are keen to prevent this educational resource from telling the truth. Sad.--[[User:JLind|JLind]] ([[User talk:JLind|talk]]) 17:35, 26 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::All the facts except that he wasn't a bomber. ''Per the Associated Press'': {{quotebox|7:50 p.m. A law enforcement official says tests have determined that a powder found inside an envelope delivered to CNN along with a pipe bomb was harmless. The official wasn’t authorized to discuss the investigation publicly and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. New York City’s police commissioner said earlier Wednesday that the package sent to CNN’s offices in Manhattan contained a live explosive and an envelope containing white powder. The FBI said the package was similar to explosives sent to former President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, former Attorney General Eric Holder and billionaire George Soros. The package sent to CNN was addressed to former CIA Director John Brennan, a frequent guest on the channel. The official says that parcel contained no note or claim of responsibility. — Tom Hays Associated Press, October 24, 2018}} [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:41, 26 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::A man sends bombs through the mail, and in your opinion, he is not a bomber? The director of the FBI is quoted as saying the devices were ‘…not hoax devices’. What, exactly, is your definition of a bomber?--[[User:JLind|JLind]] ([[User talk:JLind|talk]]) 18:17, 26 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::They were too hoax devices.  You have terrible reading comprehension. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 01:44, 28 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why did you block me? All I did was state the obvious fact that Joe Manchin is a DINO. he voted to confirm Kavanaugh, confirm Gorsuch, and supports the coal industry. He's even more right-wing than Lisa Murkowski! [[User:Libertarianmoderate2|Libertarianmoderate2]] ([[User talk:Libertarianmoderate2|talk]]) 17:50, 28 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Manchin lives in a state that voted for Trump by 40 points, and he knows it. He's appealing to the people of his state so he doesn't alienate them. Take a broader view, rather than look at the narrow set of issues where he made a big deal of supporting right-of-center people on -- for example, notice how he's voted against many of Trump's conservative circuit court nominees and several cabinet nominees. Also, when there were narrow votes for any nominee or bill, Manchin voted with Democrats -- he only voted with Republicans when his vote wasn't anywhere close to affecting the vote's outcome. And his support for Planned Parenthood is pretty extreme for a red-state Democrat who has claimed to be pro-life. I stand entirely by my reverts, and CP has never considered Murkowski a conservative, AFAIK. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:44, 28 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::And look at his record with the 2A -- he has a &amp;quot;D&amp;quot; rating from the NRA, a moderate (as opposed to GOA) pro-gun organization -- several Democrats even have better ratings than him.&lt;br /&gt;
::In short, Manchin only votes with conservatives in high profile votes when his vote is not a deciding factor in whether the bill/nominee will pass. He's not a conservative, and he's in line with the Democrat Party. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:54, 28 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about that. In the meantime, I'm a very skilled wiki writer who wrote for Wikivoyage for a while, and my skills are exactly what this site needs. I hope you can overlook this disagreement. [[User:Libertarianmoderate2|Libertarianmoderate2]] ([[User talk:Libertarianmoderate2|talk]]) 19:58, 29 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pinging==&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to ping you, but it didn't work. I typed {d{Ping|1990'sguy}d} (remove the d's, I added them here so it comes out as text). [[User:Libertarianmoderate2|Libertarianmoderate2]] ([[User talk:Libertarianmoderate2|talk]]) 20:26, 29 October 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Troll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eleonóra Dubiczki is defacing the page on Rightpedia. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 14:47, 3 November 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:There's another one named Fiala, probably a sock of the same person. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 14:50, 3 November 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==UN  migrant treaty==&lt;br /&gt;
We're gonna need a [[UN Migrant Treaty]] page. To begin, we need a thumbnail sketch what it is, then a list whose all opposed. Do you have any info to help start? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:46, 22 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes -- or [[UN Global Compact on Migration]] or something like that. Several countries have already said they will leave, so it will take some effort to track them all down. I can help. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:46, 22 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Coincidentally, I found this article giving a good list: [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/11/22/world-follows-trumps-lead-nations-abandon-legal-framework-building-un-migration-pact/] I can create and/or expand the article, if you want. I think the biggest issue will be what the title should be. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:50, 22 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'd suggest UN Migrant Treaty, then bolden the formal title; its already being discussed as &amp;quot;the [[migrant treaty]]&amp;quot;. Moves &amp;amp; redirects can be done as needed. But both the [[European migrant crisis]] and [[2018 Migrant caravan]] already need minor subsections or references to it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:53, 22 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I started it. I will do more work tomorrow, if I have time. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:56, 22 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wanna chat?==&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I'm curious if I could get to know you. I like your edits. [[User:AnnBelleAldaco96|AnnBelleAldaco96]] ([[User talk:AnnBelleAldaco96|talk]]) 22:00, 28 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can either contact me through my CP email address or through this talk page. I won't reveal/discuss personal/private info about myself (obviously), but I'd be happy to talk. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:32, 28 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Does CP hate video games? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the tone of the video games article is a little too critical. If you truly are a 1990's guy, then you probably grew up with video games too. You probably also remember the controversy of video game violence back in the 90s too (perhaps there should be a section in the article on that). Ironically, the members of Congress who pushed for potential legislation were two Democrat senators, Joe Lieberman and Herb Kohl. I was, along with my fellow kids of the 90s, booing and jeering at the old people who knew nothing about video games criticizing our hobby. There is a reason why the article &amp;quot;Essay:Greatest Conservative Video Games&amp;quot; exists. Most of the people who criticize video games are older people who didn't grow up with them. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 11:15, 29 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To be clear, the 1990s was the decade I was born in, so unfortunately, I don't have firsthand knowledge of the controversies of that decade. I played some video games, though not as much as other people, and only on my Gameboy and Nintendo DS, and I lost all interest by the time I turned, roughly, 13.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have nothing against video games in and of themselves, and I still think positively of some of the games I played. However, I think many of the criticisms of video games -- such as encouraging obesity and staying indoors rather than going outside -- are valid. Also, video game addition appears to be a real problem: [https://www.foxnews.com/tech/girl-9-sent-to-rehab-after-refusing-to-stop-playing-fortnite-wetting-herself][https://www.foxnews.com/health/compulsive-video-game-playing-now-qualifies-as-mental-health-condition] Those problems probably aren't inherent to video games, though -- they can and are used in good, harmless ways too, as I have experienced. That said, it's not a topic that I have strong feelings on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:About the article itself, it is Andy's choice to have the article the way it is. There is nothing I can do about it -- it would have to be something you would have to discuss with him if it should be changed. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:20, 29 November 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Explaination of edits to the page regarding Thomas Aquinas and theft ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did Aquinas endorse theft?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without the full quote from the Summa Theologica it would appear so, However:&lt;br /&gt;
Whether it is lawful to steal through stress of need?&lt;br /&gt;
Objection 1: It would seem unlawful to steal through stress of need. For penance is not imposed except on one who has sinned. Now it is stated (Extra, De furtis, Cap. Si quis): &amp;quot;If anyone, through stress of hunger or nakedness, steal food, clothing or beast, he shall do penance for three weeks.&amp;quot; Therefore it is not lawful to steal through stress of need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Objection 2: Further, the Philosopher says (Ethic. ii, 6) that &amp;quot;there are some actions whose very name implies wickedness,&amp;quot; and among these he reckons theft. Now that which is wicked in itself may not be done for a good end. Therefore a man cannot lawfully steal in order to remedy a need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Objection 3: Further, a man should love his neighbor as himself. Now, according to Augustine (Contra Mendac. vii), it is unlawful to steal in order to succor one's neighbor by giving him an alms. Therefore neither is it lawful to steal in order to remedy one's own needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the contrary, In cases of need all things are common property, so that there would seem to be no sin in taking another's property, for need has made it common.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I answer that, Things which are of human right cannot derogate from natural right or Divine right. Now according to the natural order established by Divine Providence, inferior things are ordained for the purpose of succoring man's needs by their means. Wherefore the division and appropriation of things which are based on human law, do not preclude the fact that man's needs have to be remedied by means of these very things. Hence whatever certain people have in superabundance is due, by natural law, to the purpose of succoring the poor. For this reason Ambrose [*Loc. cit., A[2], OBJ[3]] says, and his words are embodied in the Decretals (Dist. xlvii, can. Sicut ii): &amp;quot;It is the hungry man's bread that you withhold, the naked man's cloak that you store away, the money that you bury in the earth is the price of the poor man's ransom and freedom.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since, however, there are many who are in need, while it is impossible for all to be succored by means of the same thing, each one is entrusted with the stewardship of his own things, so that out of them he may come to the aid of those who are in need. Nevertheless, if the need be so manifest and urgent, that it is evident that the present need must be remedied by whatever means be at hand (for instance when a person is in some imminent danger, and there is no other possible remedy), then it is lawful for a man to succor his own need by means of another's property, by taking it either openly or secretly: nor is this properly speaking theft or robbery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reply to Objection 1: This decretal considers cases where there is no urgent need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reply to Objection 2: It is not theft, properly speaking, to take secretly and use another's property in a case of extreme need: because that which he takes for the support of his life becomes his own property by reason of that need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reply to Objection 3: In a case of a like need a man may also take secretly another's property in order to succor his neighbor in need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/aquinas/summa/sum322.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In cases of need all things are common property, so that there would seem to be no sin in taking another's property, for need has made it common&amp;quot; is not in the Summa Theogica and is therefore inaccurate and misleading. The quote should be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;It is not theft, properly speaking, to take secretly and use another's property in a case of extreme need: because that which he takes for the support of his life becomes his own property by reason of that need.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will therefore change the quote to the correct quotation. {{unsigned|JPConservative}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Look again -- both quotes are there, and they're quoted accurately. The article is correct in saying that Aquinas does not take a strong position on property rights as other conservatives (including John Locke, the intellectual father of the founding fathers) held. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:39, 11 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quotes used misses out that Thomas Aquinas was referring to those who might die of starvation, not merely out of need. The original quotes in the article imply that he supported &amp;quot;Socialism&amp;quot; which is not so. Aquinas did take a strong stand on property rights, he made one exception, those who face death can take some food (and by implication, water &amp;amp; clothing.) This is the interpretation that the Catholic Church uses and is supported by the majority of Thomists. {{unsigned|JPConservative}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Once again, the quote mentioning hunger was already quoted in the paragraph. Also, the paragraph doesn't say that he supported socialism, but that it represented a slippery slope. Either way, his position is weaker than that of some other intellectuals who wrote on property rights. I might (possibly) be OK with a single short sentence/phrase saying that overall he supported property rights, if you can back it up, but the specific info you're citing does not back it up. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:03, 11 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes hunger is mentioned, but the meaning has been distorted, I can assure you that having studied the Summa Theologica in a monastery guided by a Thomist professor that the section on Politic Philosophy is wrong. It is not a correct interpretation of Aquinas's political views. Thomas Aquinas clearly upholds property rights in the Summa Theologica:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I answer that, Two things are competent to man in respect of exterior things. One is the power to procure and dispense them, and in this regard it is lawful for man to possess property. Moreover this is necessary to human life for three reasons. First because every man is more careful to procure what is for himself alone than that which is common to many or to all: since each one would shirk the labor and leave to another that which concerns the community, as happens where there is a great number of servants. Secondly, because human affairs are conducted in more orderly fashion if each man is charged with taking care of some particular thing himself, whereas there would be confusion if everyone had to look after any one thing indeterminately. Thirdly, because a more peaceful state is ensured to man if each one is contented with his own. Hence it is to be observed that quarrels arise more frequently where there is no division of the things possessed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second thing that is competent to man with regard to external things is their use. In this respect man ought to possess external things, not as his own, but as common, so that, to wit, he is ready to communicate them to others in their need. Hence the Apostle says (1 Tim. 6:17, 18): &amp;quot;Charge the rich of this world . . . to give easily, to communicate to others,&amp;quot; etc.&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/aquinas/summa/sum322.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Yes, I can back up my claims. The quoted I cited are from authorized sites. I have used the quotes as written and provided links, so please explain how I am wrong?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is additional proof that Thomas Aquinas upheld property rights https://tifwe.org/five-insights-about-private-property-from-aquinas/&lt;br /&gt;
{{unsigned|JPConservative}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have added further material to refute the idea that the writings of Thomas Aquinas can be used to support Socialism. If you edit or remove it, please first demonstrate that I am wrong. Thank you &amp;amp; God Blessings be with you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==just an idea...==&lt;br /&gt;
What do you think of coining the term [[anti-constitutionalist]] to describe people who oppose constitutionalists? People who oppose free speech, gun rights, due process, etc. There certainly are a lot of them in the upcoming session of Congress. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, we'd need a working definition, then a list of members with their stated positions. The idea may catch on. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:52, 12 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I like it. What do you think of a definition along the lines of &amp;quot;someone who opposes the rights contained in the Constitution, and by extension, the United States as envisioned by the founding fathers&amp;quot;? This is just a draft proposal, the wording wouldn't be final. Maybe we should note that the Constitution reflects a classical liberal philosophy, showing that these &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; reject liberalism? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 00:06, 13 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes. In various articles [[Justice Kavanaugh]] is refered to as a constitutionalist, so I suspect we'll be hearing more of term in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now, advocates for Amending the Constitution wouldn't automatically fall into this category. People who want to abolish the Electoral College or hold a constitutional convention, for example - if that is their single issue. I'm thinking of people who want outright repeal of the 2nd Amendment, advocate free speech suppression and censorship, disrespect due process and the presumption of innocence as in the Kavanaugh and Judge Moore cases, or ignore the 4th Amendment violations of the FBI &amp;amp; DOJ. Anyone who holds two or more of these positions could be considered an anti-constitutionalist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::One more thing, I've discovered that whoever is among the first to create a page with a new term entering the public lexicon, Google algorithms favor and can hold a high ranking for years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:26, 13 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::About the Electoral College and Con Con distinction, it think that's fair, and it would be good to at least make a distinction between the two. We would need to make this clear to readers, though. That said, one could argue that wanting to change the Constitution on something as important as the Electoral College also a rejection of the U.S. as envisioned by the founding fathers. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:46, 13 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's right. That's why I'm thinking two or more. Somebody who wants to abolidh the electoral college and repeal gun rights, then refuses due process and presumption of innocence, and is okay with illegal domestic spying, is an anti-constitutionalist. Throw in support for [[Medicare for All]] and they call themselves a progressive or Democratic Socialist, it's pretty clear they want to tear down the two party system. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:34, 13 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::We shouldn't spell out our criteria on the page before naming names, and if we put everybody on the list who belongs, it would be too long and nobody would read it. We simply need a paragraph or two or three to define in philosophical terms what makes someone opposed to our system of government, and then in the next section spell out a few leaders what positions they've taken to supoort the label, Pelosi, Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez, and other high profile figures we can cite. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:40, 13 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The draft below looks great -- and it accurately describes the modern Left. Is &amp;quot;collective responsibility&amp;quot; (#6) the left's counter to states' rights? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 06:26, 14 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::On number 6 that's right. I don't recall the exact language on Form 1040 related to the Obamacare individual mandate. I should dig it out and tweak it.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Anyway we got enough to get started. It'll change over time. We should be on the look out for buzzwords and phrases that help define an Anti-Constitutionalist. &lt;br /&gt;
::::::As the 2020 election approaches, rather than a long list on the page, we can just create a Category. And the beauty of this idea is, in keeping with liberalism, they don't have to adhere to a strict set of principles, all they have to do is exhibit a few characteristics. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:16, 14 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pattern===&lt;br /&gt;
I googled around and found most definitions of constitutionalist are cut n pastes of each other. Some have lists of principles, but remember, anti-constitutionalists have no principles, they have characteristics. To be an anti-constitutionalist, you don't have to conform or adhere to a list of principles, you just have to resemble a few characteristics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This came ftom the Urban Dictionary. So all we need to do is tweak the language away from it's original documents or meaning into something other, or it's opposite:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Constitutionalist&lt;br /&gt;
1. An individual that shares the views of the political theories of John Locke and the founders of the American republic, that government can and should be legally limited in its powers, and that its authority or legitimacy depends on its observing these limitations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. An individual who believes in the basic standards and ideals are to be consistent with an overriding rule of law or ethics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 7 principles of a Constitutionalist:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Life: For all human beings, from conception to natural death;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Liberty: Freedom of conscience and actions for the self-governed individual;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Family: One husband and one wife with their children as divinely instituted;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Property: Each individual's right to own and steward personal property without government burden;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Constitution: and Bill of Rights interpreted according to the actual intent of the Founding Fathers;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. States' Rights: Everything not specifically delegated by the Constitution to the federal government, nor prohibited by the Constitution to the states, is reserved to the states or to the people;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. American Sovereignty: American government committed to the protection of the borders, trade, and common defense of Americans, and not entangled in foreign alliances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Draft 1===&lt;br /&gt;
Here's a start. Now remember. we sort of want to use their own langusge, logic, meaning, and reasoning, so when they read it, they're looking in a mirror. Characteristic #2 needs some work. Feel free to change or suggest anything. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Constitutionalists&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Persons who reject the views of the political theories of [[John Locke]] and the founding fathers of the American republic, that government can and should be limited in its powers. Anti-Constitutionalists believe in the supremacy of federal power over individual rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Persons who believe in the basic standards and ideals are to be consistent with [[progressive]] values and the rule of law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 7 characteristics of many anti-constitutionalists:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Life: For all human beings, and a [[pro-abortion|right to choice]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Liberty: Freedom of conscience and actions to suppress [[fascist]] ideals;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Family: Equal rights to marry anyone among 58 known genders;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Diversity: Out of one, many.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Constitution: Outdated and written by white male slaveghlolders;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. Collective Responsibilty: A duty not a choice;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Sovereignty: The universal power, authority, and  kinship of the human species.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Can you unblock me please?, I want to improve Dirty War pg==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Got your message loud and clear and want to keep creating pages for Conservapedia but only under 1 account name. Thanks again.--[[User:Raymondo|Raymondo]] ([[User talk:Raymondo|talk]]) 08:56, 13 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The account you used to write on my talk page is unblocked. You can use that one. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 09:34, 13 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for unblocking me, greatly appreciated.--[[User:Raymondo|Raymondo]] ([[User talk:Raymondo|talk]]) 07:53, 25 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello again, can we change the following page title [[Battles of Mount Kent and Top Malo House]] to [[Battle of Mount Kent and Top Malo House]], remove the &amp;quot;s&amp;quot; from battles, once again thanking you very much and all the best in the new year.--[[User:Raymondo|Raymondo]] ([[User talk:Raymondo|talk]]) 20:17, 25 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello, please request this change at [[User talk:DavidB4]], as I currently do not have move powers. He will move the page for you. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:25, 25 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Done as requested: [[Battle of Mount Kent and Top Malo House]] --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:14, 26 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Appeal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi. I noticed I can't edit anything to appeal my block [[Special:Contribs/Edenfaithful|here]]. I'm sorry if you thought my edits were trolling; they weren't. AOC does actually want a government-enforced redistribution of wealth via her universal basic income ideas and other concepts. I won't use this account to do anything other than appeal; it's not meant to be harmful. I want to contribute. [[User:Tempacctformessage|Tempacctformessage]] ([[User talk:Tempacctformessage|talk]]) 13:38, 25 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have unblocked your account. In the future, please do not make any edits that could be seen as trolling or parody -- your edits on AOC may have been true, but this is an encyclopedia -- all wording should be encyclopedic. If you're going to add particularly strong language like that, it should at least be cited by a good conservative news source. Otherwise, it's personal commentary, which should stay on your user page or an &amp;quot;essay&amp;quot; page. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:37, 25 December 2018 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Internet control ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I have a random question which I was wondering if you might know the answer to.  When Obama was in office, he released control of the Internet to the W3C (an international organization).  In the opinion of many conservatives including myself, this was a big mistake.  I since heard in vague terms that Trump had somehow put a stop to the transfer and retained at least partial control.  However, my research attempts have turned up little of value.  Do you know if this is something Trump has done, and if so, to what extent?  Thank you! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:00, 8 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I remember noting that there was a bit of a controversy between Ted Cruz and the Commerce Department nominee most in charge of this topic area, but the nominee agreed to &amp;quot;look into it&amp;quot; (whatever that means): [http://thehill.com/policy/technology/359325-trump-pick-confirmed-to-telecommunications-federal-agency 1],[https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/23/trump-commerce-pick-internet-oversight-reversal-305178 2],[http://thehill.com/policy/technology/370426-trump-commerce-pick-told-lawmakers-he-would-look-at-reversing-obama-move-on 3] I looked into it further, and found these opinion articles ([http://netpolicynews.com/index.php/89-r/997-trump-wants-u-s-to-take-over-internet-governance-like-putin 1],[https://lawreview.unl.edu/Should-the-U.S.-Reclaim-Control-of-the-Internet 2]), which indicate that nothing was done, though I also found [https://regmedia.co.uk/2018/06/05/ntia-internet-policy-noi-jun18.pdf this notice in the Federal Register] where the Commerce Department asked what should be done with the transfer. The government is looking into it, but so far, I have not found anything saying that an official policy change has been enacted.&lt;br /&gt;
:I am very interested in this, and I think whatever decision the government makes, it will be relevant to the [[Donald Trump achievements]] series -- so if you find anything else, or if the government makes a decision in the future, please let me know. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:27, 8 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Looking into it....&amp;quot; I feel so much better now.  I thought I probably would have heard something if action had been taken, but figured I'd check with you.  I will keep my ears, and if I hear anything, will let you know.  I expect it would be relevant to the achievements pages, hopefully in a positive way.  Thank you for the information! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:33, 8 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I suppose I must admit that one of the main arguments from the left is true...we were not evenly allocating IP addresses. However, if we invented the internet, do we really need to evenly distribute them?  Using Network Address Translation, IPv4 has worked quite well.  As we began running out of addresses even then, IPv6 was set up in some parts of the world, which gives us MANY more addresses to work with.  Should everyone be switched over to IPv6? Yes, probably.  However, just giving away all control of the internet to an organization which may as well be a U.N. of sorts can't be a good solution. I also hope the W3C doesn't start setting up new root servers in more...questionable locations. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:39, 8 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The Left and globalists don't want the U.S. to be dominant, independent/sovereign, or self-sufficient, so that explains why they chose to give away our control of the internet to a &amp;quot;fair&amp;quot; international organization that socialist, Islamic, anti-American, and autocratic governments can control just as much, if not more, than our country. Globalists and the Left would prefer that the U.S. just follows along with the &amp;quot;rules-based international order&amp;quot; rather than take leadership and go its own way. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 21:36, 8 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Seraphim 2 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What led you to believe this is a sock account? [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 15:48, 23 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It was created during a vandalism spree, and once or twice, the vandal(s) created two accounts simultaneously and started vandalizing through both of them. This account was created at the same time as another account (can't remember which one) which began continuing the vandalism, appearing to follow the trend. Thus, I blocked the other account and then blocked this one before (I assumed) it started vandalizing. If it doesn't seem suspicious to you, then please unblock it. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:04, 23 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I would try to avoid doing that in absence of evidence because there have been cases on other wikis when innocent parties have been blocked like this, but I'm not going to undo the block at this time. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 17:23, 23 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your wiki work on Trump was alluded to in a web article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your wiki work on Trump was alluded to in a web article. See: http://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2018/11/losing-dignity-still-losing/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a pretty well read website as can be seen here: https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/quadrant.org.au&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I found out about the citation using this free tool: https://muckrack.com  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:53, 29 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Great -- it's an indirect allusion, but it works. Have you seen these mentions of my [[Donald Trump achievements]] article? [https://stonecoldtruth.com/despite-continuous-attacks-trump-getting-the-job-done/ One from Roger Stone] and [https://twitter.com/mitchellvii/status/881978883771445248 another by Bill Mitchell], who Trump has retweeted in the past. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:52, 29 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks for sharing with me those mentions of your article.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:47, 29 January 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lou Dobbs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, 1990's guy, check out [[Lou Dobbs]]' Conservapedia article:  He himself claims he is an &amp;quot;independent populist&amp;quot;.  Lots of people who do news reporting and support Trump call themselves independent like [[Jedidiah Bila]], [[Alex Jones]] or were Democrat, like [[Harlan Hill]].  We really ought to respect their wishes, don't you think? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 00:11, 8 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:First off, self-descriptions are meaningless. Dobbs can call himself whatever he wants, but it's his actual positions that matter -- and those positions are, without a doubt, conservative. There are many [[token conservative]]s who align 80-100% with globalist Democrats but still call themselves &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; -- but we shouldn't add them to your essay because of what they call themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, you may be confusing political party affiliation with political philosophy -- Dobbs isn't a Republican (maybe he rejoined, IDK), but he left because of the Bush Administration's liberal policies on issues such as immigration. It's his political views that matter, not his political party, and Dobbs's positions are conservative, meaning we can safely call him a conservative. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 00:27, 8 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm a bit embarrassed that I took Lou Dobbs' self-description &amp;quot;independent&amp;quot; to mean non-conservative instead of non-Republican, so not only is what you say correct, but it turns out I've never even heard him deny he's a conservative, here or elsewhere.  I don't know if you know this, but coincidentally, I added Lou Dobbs' name to the TCOT list myself in April 2017.  But I removed it the same day because of the &amp;quot;independent&amp;quot; label I saw mentioned in his Conservapedia entry soon after I had added his name to the list.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm still concerned, though—Lou Dobbs lives in the liberal stronghold, New York City, and there are cowards that live there who can be vicious if they think they have an easy target.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Here's something else that's funny; [[Jedidiah Bila]] also called herself an independent (in November 2016) and also lives in New York City.  And I delisted her for the very same reasons I used for removing Lou Dobbs' name.  I just now checked to see if I could find whether she ever called herself a conservative or just an independent, and, long story short, she labelled herself as conservative in September 2017!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::So, in a way, your diligence has rescued Jedidiah Bila from obscurity in the &amp;quot;conservative world&amp;quot;! But I'm still interested in what you think about Lou Dobbs. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 02:20, 9 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Basically, there are two types of Republicans, National Republicans involved in federal issues, and Independent Republicans - people involved in local and state issues, like school board elections and legislative races. The IRs are moreless divorced from the federal issues, usually because they just aren't interested in what the RNC is doing, occassionally over a policy dispute. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:07, 9 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Dobbs is a TV host -- he has to live in New York City (or nearby) as a result. He has company though, with Trump, Hannity, and others. I think it's obvious Tucker Carlson is a conservative, but he lives in Washington, D.C., where only 4% of the population voted for Trump. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:29, 9 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ESchlafly==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I get the name &amp;quot;Schlafly&amp;quot; being suspect, but Andy doesn't have a monopoly on it. I say assume good faith for now, unless a senior admin says otherwise. [[User:DMorris|DMorris]] ([[User talk:DMorris|talk]]) 20:41, 12 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Fair enough. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:54, 12 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Technically, the username is &amp;quot;ESchafly,&amp;quot; which is slightly different anyway. In any case, for an apparently good faith editor, perhaps autoblock should be disabled if they are blocked on grounds of their username alone. Anyway, I was also suspicious...no harm done. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:51, 13 February 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thank you==&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for tidying my attempt at an external link in the article on the [[British Psychological Society]]. It is appreciated. [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 12:33, 18 March 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:57, 18 March 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Christchurch: terrorism? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi there! Thanks for your frequent positive contributions to Conservapedia. I'm new here so still trying to learn the ropes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel like the use of &amp;quot;Direct Action&amp;quot; in the leading paragraph of the [[New Zealand mosque shooting]] article, rather than &amp;quot;terrorism&amp;quot;, is euphemstic and betrays the principles put forth on [[Conservapedia:How_Conservapedia_Differs_from_Wikipedia]]. Would a similar change be appropriate on the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]] page? {{unsigned|Liberalnutjob}}&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not opposed to labeling it a terrorist attack -- the article uses the term several times, including through some edits I made to the article. I'm not sure the CP article you linked is particularly relevant here since the Wikipedia article does call it a terrorist attack in the intro (just as we do in the body).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I recommend you message [[User talk:RobSmith]], who is the main author of the article and who inserted the &amp;quot;direct action&amp;quot; link in the intro. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:17, 6 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hello!==&lt;br /&gt;
:Hey dude! I know you from Wikipedia! I'm here for anti-vandalism work. I am an administrator from [http://deletionpedia.org/en/Special:UserRights/DW Deletionpedia.org]. [[User:DW|DW]] ([[User talk:DW|talk]]) 13:29, 9 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hello -- what is your Wikipedia account name, if you don't mind me asking? --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:57, 9 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Please create these articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1990'sguy, please create these article and I will tell you why later:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Top 10 achievements of Donald Trump]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump achievements before presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of Trump's accomplishments in 2019]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of Trump's accomplishments in 2018]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Donald Trump achievements in his life]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, if this article can be improved, please do it: [[Trump administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this helps.[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:52, 10 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I will try to create at least some of these when I get time. The two &amp;quot;life achievements&amp;quot; articles seem like good ideas, though the 2018 and 2019 articles would be problematic, particularly with fitting them into my article series which is not based on year. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 08:36, 10 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unnecessary? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My prefix to [[liberal]], describing that kind of person as a United States resident, was included because it's an exclusively U.S. term.  In other countries, liberals are known by other names, such as the Labor party in the UK.  My edit was not unnecessary, and I would appreciate it if you could please let it stand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I took a similar issue with the statement that &amp;quot;most individuals are overweight&amp;quot; in every article dealing with obesity.  Nationally, this is true, but, globally, it is false.  There are more Asians than there are Americans in the world, and 2 billion of them are starving, outnumbering America's obese population 10 to 1. {{unsigned|MacTavish}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I oppose changing it back, and there's a big difference between the exact definition of certain terminology and health statistics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Labour Party is a political party, and CP's &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; page refers to the ideology. I travel to (continental) Europe frequently, and the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; is increasingly meaning the same thing as in the U.S. while &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; increasingly means something similar to the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:More importantly, the CP article clearly defines what a liberal is, and that's what matters. Every political term like this has multiple meanings, depending on who's doing the explaining. The best solution to the problem of the same words having many different meanings is to clearly define the word and create articles such as the [[classical liberalism]] or [[liberal conservatism]] articles. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:59, 15 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bible ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I note that you believe that &amp;quot;As unpopular it is to believe this in our present culture, I know that the Bible contains absolutely no errors or mistakes&amp;quot;. Last night I was listening to an interesting talk on the radio about [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+8%3A3-11&amp;amp;version=ESV John 8:3-11], and this has led me to pondering this morning [https://www.openbible.info/topics/stoning_to_death what the Bible has to say about stoning people to death]. My question is how can anyone, in light of this, believe that the Bible is always to be taken literally? I accept that the Bible contains invaluable spiritual truths but I also consider that it is the creation of fallible human beings. I believe that such barbarous practices as stoning someone to death, for blasphemy, sexual misconduct, and breaking the Sabbath,  is a reflection of the values of an early pastoral society and not God's word. To be honest with you I find ''any'' type of dogmatic belief deeply disturbing. I note that the Conservapedia article takes a moderate line on the [[Bible]]: &amp;quot;The Bible is the most logical, insightful and influential collection of books and letters ever written&amp;quot;, and doesn't claim that it's the word of God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of our recent &amp;quot;conversations&amp;quot; you seemed to be the most obvious person to ask this question. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 13:15, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:First off, the Bible contains a unified narrative free of contradictions and errors. The human writers were men of their times (Solomon's wives, Noah's drunkenness), but God is the true author of the Bible and none of his commands are wrong or &amp;quot;barbarous.&amp;quot; The Mosaic Law was directly commanded by God and is not some reflection of early pastoral society values (I will also say that stoning is ''not'' merely an &amp;quot;early pastoral society&amp;quot; value--the urban Greeks did it, Acts 14:19, and modern urban Brunei and other Islamic countries are doing it).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You need to understand the Mosaic Law and its place in God's plan to redeem humanity. God revealed Himself first to the Israelites, and in preparing them for the Promised Land, he gave them the Mosaic Law. The Mosaic Law was good and holy (Romans 7:12) -- so good that the Israelites found they, sinful humans, couldn't even follow it correctly. Yes, some of the punishments for various sins include stoning, but remember, &amp;quot;the wages of sin is death&amp;quot; (Romans 6:23). The better question than &amp;quot;why did God command this&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;why didn't God command this for everybody and for every sin&amp;quot;. Instead, by giving the law to the Israelites, God showed them they couldn't save themselves. They needed a savior--Jesus Christ. Also, see Deuteronomy 17:6 -- two or three witnesses were required to be stoned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jesus didn't abolish the law, he fulfilled it. I recommend reading the Book of Hebrews -- because of Christ's sacrificing Himself on the cross (great timing in asking your question), we no longer need to make animal sacrifices or follow the civic parts of the law (which include stoning)--that doesn't make the law &amp;quot;barbaric&amp;quot; though. Also, in John 8, Jesus did not condemn stoning outright. The Jews did not have witnesses nor did they have the guilty man with them either to stone, contrary to the law's requirements.[https://www.gotquestions.org/without-sin-cast-first-stone.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope this helps. Ask me other questions if you'd like. I also highly recommend [https://www.gotquestions.org/ GotQuestion.org] for other Christianity-related questions. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:47, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Many thanks for taking the time to answer me.  Sorry to be argumentative, but I'm still confused, because on one hand you seem to be suggesting that Christ would have supported stoning the adulteress to death if the man had also been arrested, and there had been two witnesses? But on the other hand you also seem to suggest that, because Christ rose from the dead, Mosaic law no longer needed be applied. and that following the Resurrection stoning someone to death was no longer lawful? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Surely Christans are right in believing that stoning a rebellious child, or someone who collects firewood on a Sunday, or because they are sexually involved with someone of the same sex is no longer the word of God? That ''now'' such practices are dated –&amp;quot;barbaric&amp;quot;? That Christ brought a new message from God, one that is entirely different from what Moses received? A message in which charity and forgiveness is far more important than punishment. That we should focus first on our own failures rather than those of others:  &amp;quot;Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her”. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 15:41, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The gospel was preached to Israel in the wilderness (Hebrews 4:2). Israel was given the choice between Law and Grace. Law can only condemn, Grace saves. Israel chose Law (&amp;quot;Moses told us to stone such a one&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
:::There are other such examples in the Bible where people (or man, to use the politically incorrect parlance), made choices with long-term consequences that God did not ordain, such as when Jethro (Moses' father-in-law) gave advice to [[community organizer|organize]] the people into captains of tens and captains of hundreds, etc., or when God advised against Israel having a King who would &amp;quot;multiply horses,&amp;quot; (i.e. build a military industrial complex) and Solomon proceeded to do exactly that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:56, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Thanks [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]. So how should 21st century man operate? You generalize, whereas I asked specific questions. Do fundamentalist Christians believe that Christ's Resurrection changed Mosaic law, or should we , if possible, return to it.  [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 16:52, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If you're going to continue editing here, it's important you realise the management considers the adultress story to be a [[Essay:Adulteress Story|liberal insertion]]. Buckle in! [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 16:56, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Mosaic Law never intended to save. It is still operable for those who reject Grace. And faith in the Resurrection  always provided grace - knowing that whatsoever he promised, he was able to deliver (Romans 4:21) - even before Jesus' birth, death, and resurrection. Law always only applies to the lost, and not blood washed believers in Christ.&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Now, Christians are admonished to act in such a way as to be an example to non-believers (to do otherwise is not acting in love); however it is not determinative of a person's standing in Christ or eternal salvation, and to preach otherwise, that is to say salvation is determined by works, is the spirit of anti-Christ. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:02, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I would not so much say that Israel chose the law, as it was a matter of that being all there was.  The law taught a great deal about the nature of God, the depravity of men, and the seriousness of sin, among other lessons. The law was given to state how, from at least an outward sense, mankind should behave in order to keep God's perfect law. Under the law, certain sins were deserving of death--this was to show the seriousness of transgression. It is easy for us to look at some sin and say, &amp;quot;Well, it was only one small sin.  Everyone makes mistakes, so just give him/her a break!  It's not THAT serious!&amp;quot;  However, we are judging with sentimentality from the perspective of a sinner.  Only God can judge righteously from the perspective of perfection.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::This rule did not really go away, either.  Certainly we don't execute people for &amp;quot;minor&amp;quot; sins, but James said that &amp;quot;For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all&amp;quot; (James 2:10).  One singe sin is enough to make us less than perfect, which makes us utterly filthy and unacceptable to God, much as a single act of defiance made an old testament Jew unacceptable to the congregation. God has given us a way out through His Son, but without that, we will face a judgement worse than stoning for a single act of sin (which is itself defiance against the one truly holy God).  Only because of Jesus' shed blood can we be forgiven these sins, and made as though we are perfect, by Jesus' merit. The Hebrews didn't seem to know that Jesus was coming as a sacrifice, rather than a king, but yet they sacrificed animals to gain forgiveness for their sins, looking forward to Jesus' sacrifice. &lt;br /&gt;
:::::::In regard to the adulteress specifically, There has been a great deal of debate by people more intelligent than I. Under mosaic law, she was guilty, but it seems that either she was forgiven under the new law and no longer deserving of death, or she should have justly been stoned, but the congregation failed to do so(or the witnesses failed to testify against her properly), due to Jesus' words. In either case, Jesus sends her away alive. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:11, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::In response to Timber's followup question, the Mosaic Law is just, but it's impossible to follow. That's why Jesus died on the cross -- so we can actually have a path to salvation, one by God's grace through faith and not by works.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::However, this doesn't mean that the message of the law is &amp;quot;entirely different&amp;quot; from Christ -- in fact, the total opposite. The law pointed people to Christ, that it's impossible to follow it and that they need Jesus. Also, through sacrifices, God provided a way for the Jews' sins to be forgiven. By dying on the cross, our past, present, and future sins are forgiven if we trust in Christ, without need for sacrifices. God will judge everyone in the end, but right now, we live in the age of grace, and the Mosaic Law has been fulfilled through Christ. '''Also,''' the Mosaic Law was never intended to be required of all people everywhere -- only the Israelites before Christ.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If I'm understanding [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;amp;curid=139936&amp;amp;diff=1517413&amp;amp;oldid=1517408 Rob] correctly, I agree that many actions by people in the Bible are not condoned by God, but the Mosaic Law isn't one of them. It came from God to set the Israelites apart from other nations (Exodus 19:5) and reveal their sinfulness to them (Galatians 3:19; Romans 3:20), among other reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::For the record, I believe the adultress story is a valid part of the Bible. Others here disagree. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:15, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Moses spoke to Lord face to face as a man speaketh to his friend (Exodus 33:11) and &amp;quot;found grace in thy sight&amp;quot; (Exodus 33:13); the New Testament says &amp;quot;No man hath seen God at anytime&amp;quot; (John 1:27). Now, unless you think there are contradictions in the Bible, one has to explain Hebrews 12:14 (without holiness no one will see the Lord) and more specifically, 1 Cor. 2:13, &amp;quot;comparing spiritual things with spiritual&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::In conclusion, (a) Moses was saved; (b) the Law of Moses could not save then, and it can not save now; (c) Christ has existed from everlasting to everlasting, before the foundations of the earth were laid; (d) ye are not under law, but under grace. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:36, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Roman Catholic theology explains the difference between the Perfect Will of God and the Permissive Will of God (for example, God allowing David to marry Bethsheba after David committed adultery and murdered her husband). And while the Mosaic Law may be an expression of the Perfect Will of God, it nevertheless still cannot save. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:44, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many thanks that makes things much clearer.  [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 19:29, 19 April 2019 (EDT) I greatly appreciate that you both have offered such a thorough explanation. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 19:31, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cyrus ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi 1990'sguy,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't think we need flashy photos of anti-Christian celebrities, which promote their lifestyles to our kids. [[User:DouglasA|DouglasA]] ([[User talk:DouglasA|talk]]) 13:54, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll ask Andy about this. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:58, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We could get a less &amp;quot;flashy&amp;quot; photo I suppose, but we are here to educate people of all ages.  While I may not approve of her lifestyle, I don't really see an problem with including it, since this helps to educate our readers.  It is not at all uncommon for use to include photos of people on pages talking about them. And actually, this &amp;quot;flashy&amp;quot; photo may be well suited, since it demonstrates that she is all about the show. --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:27, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is becoming a real problem for CP, since deviant sex seems to be the Democratic party's key plank in the 2020 elections. Ignoring their issues is fraught with problems. They must be tastefully addressed; and we shouldn't pass up the opportunity to straighten out readers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:09, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit war ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi 1990'sguy, you have twice blocked me for edit warring. I don't like being quarrelsome but with due respect to your seniority I don't think you really understand what edit warring is. My reverts had an explanation and yours did not. You tended to ignore&lt;br /&gt;
the Conservapedia Guidelines. Also you didn't issue any warning, or suggest starting a discussion. I have edited on Wikipedia for several years and have a clean record there, I'd also note, the highly undemocratic exercise of administrative power here. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 16:24, 21 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The fact is the Barack Obama article has been the way it is for years, and several editors (RobS and Pokeria, for example) support it, at least overall, and oppose your changes. Also, you admit you're not a conservative. And you think you can just come in and unilaterally make edits that others oppose? That's not how it works here. Continuing to revert will only get you indefinitely banned -- I hope you realize I'm being extremely gracious by only giving short blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, CP makes no apology for not being &amp;quot;democratic.&amp;quot; We're a conservative encyclopedia with a conservative point of view, which includes support for natural law and republicanism over mob-rule democracy that Aristotle, the Ancient Roman Republicans, and the U.S. founding fathers opposed. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 16:57, 21 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Thanks -[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]]. I have no quarrel with this site's extreme right wing ideology but I do quarrel with its failure at times to implement its own policy of  truth  and verifiablity and the way  some editors use of gossip and dubious sources. Also most of the editors I have dealt with recently are very slippery politicians–that is they avoid answering any comment or question. By the way the Barack Obama article is contradictory. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 18:18, 21 April 2019 (EDT) Additionally most edits made by you and others do not have an explanation. [[User:Timber|Timber]] ([[User talk:Timber|talk]]) 18:25, 21 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::ach ach &amp;lt;choke&amp;gt; WaPo, NYT &amp;amp; CNN aren't dubious sources? they don't use gossip? Liberal commie scholars and Marxist PhD's aren't dubious sources? As to edit summaries, you gotta earn your stripes. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:46, 21 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::C'mon. Be reasonable and realistic. The ''NYT'' White House correspondent thinks ''Edelweiss'' is a Nazi anthem. Never in my life has there been such an open opportunity for citizen journalists as right now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:49, 21 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::@Timber: I'm not particularly interested in the Barack Obama dispute -- what I care about is avoiding edit warring and making sure we give due treatment to material which has been in the articles for a long time. Thus, the content should be discussed on the talk page. On Wikipedia, not having a consensus for changes similar to yours is good enough explanation for reverting, so CP isn't actually too much different. Regarding the behavior of other editors, you might just be experiencing their differing personalities, that's all. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:51, 21 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::@1990'sguy, he's not learning his lesson, I've given him a long block, not just for the edit warring, but also for his pretentious attitude, especially on this edit summary: [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Michelle_Obama&amp;amp;diff=1518377&amp;amp;oldid=1518376] [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 19:18, 21 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Personally, I have no objection to moving the sections on natural born citizenship to [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama]] where it can be debated or sources challenged. The lesson here is, work somebody else put much time into should not be overwritten just cause some liberal communist doesn't like it or it isn't sanctioned by [[fake news]] [[mainstream media]] sources. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:08, 21 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::@RobS: It might be worth considering moving some of that content into the [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama]] article. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 17:14, 21 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Let Timber do it, and we can seriously vet sources and wording on the Talk page there. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:16, 21 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Look at this edit ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please look at this edit: [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia&amp;amp;diff=1519161&amp;amp;oldid=1516763 1990'sguy and Conservapedia]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:39, 24 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks, Conservative, I really appreciate it! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:57, 24 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::That's great, I only wish the essays I made about Christian virtues could get this kind of notability. [[User:Shobson20|Shobson20]] ([[User talk:Shobson20|talk]]) 14:26, 24 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I recommend linking them in the &amp;quot;See also&amp;quot; sections of relevant articles and continuing to work on them. That might make Andy or Cons more likely to promote them on the main page. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:38, 24 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What happened to you user page? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your page was vaped by [[User:Conservative]], on or about April 22.  It was then recreated as a blank page, also by Cons, on April 23.  Do you know anything about this?  I recall that you had a lot of interesting things to say on your user page.  Do you have a backup copy?  Alas, I don't normally checkpoint other people's user pages, so I don't have a copy.  (Though I do have a checkpoint copy of your talk page.)  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:51, 26 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I asked Cons to do it -- don't worry, I have all the information saved, and I could recreate it if I want. I thought I should be more &amp;quot;low-key&amp;quot; on wikis, and I did the same to my Wikipedia user page (which I also have a copy of). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:34, 26 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Question. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello. Is it possible to write about artists? {{unsigned|RinatMilow}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You may write about what you want on the following conditions:&lt;br /&gt;
:#Everything is sourced with reliable sources -- no exceptions&lt;br /&gt;
:#This is a conservative encyclopedia, so nothing from a non-conservative perspective, wherever applicable&lt;br /&gt;
:#Absolutely no plagiarism, including from Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
:#Know all of CP's rules and guidelines (you can find them at the top of my talk page)&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope this helps. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:28, 4 May 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wrote an article,tried to do it right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RinatMilow|RinatMilow]]&lt;br /&gt;
:This website does not do self-promotion.  You can write about artists like Picasso, Dali, Michaelangelo, etc, but I noticed that you're doing promoting yourself on this (deleted) and other websites.  Not here.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 11:00, 4 May 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't promote anything anywhere where to me what to write, it is especially my personal right. I'm not upset. I'm not upset that the article didn't fit.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RinatMilow|RinatMilow]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Donald Trump's achievements keep rolling in ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The ''[[New York Times]]'' FINALLY Admits:''' The World is Turning [[Nationalism|Nationalist]] [[Populism|Populist]].[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQOgUVsUQJQ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''New York Times'' article admitted that this statement of [[Donald Trump]] was prophetic: &amp;quot;We gonna win so much you may even get tired of winning and you'll say please, please Mr. President, It's too much winning! We can't take it anymore!&amp;quot;[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:34, 27 May 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Trump has been very successful as a president so far, especially considering that Republicans opposed much of his agenda in 2017/2018 and the divided Congress now. The EU elections went well -- the League outperformed exit polls by a lot, becoming the largest party in Italy and tied as the largest in the EU Parliament, and the Brexit Party also won more seats than predictions I saw beforehand. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:43, 27 May 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The Greens continue to gain, at the expense of Social Democrats. This is reflective of a younger, climate orientated group of socialists, just as radical, more single issue oriented and naive, trying to throw off the history established Socialist parties. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:06, 27 May 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article suggestion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consider creating this article: [[Donald Trump achievements: Religious freedom]][[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:08, 1 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It might be a good split-up article. All religious freedom achievements are currently at [[Donald Trump achievements: Religious liberty, gender issues, and other social policies]]. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:19, 1 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I might split the article into [[Donald Trump achievements: Religious freedom and LGBTQ]] and [[Donald Trump achievements: Healthcare, welfare, housing, and affirmative action]] -- I might have to rework the article titles, among other changes, before I actually implement this. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:27, 1 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
§== Could you delete this file? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I uploaded this file from the mobile version of the website and the title messed up, could you remove the pic? I already uploaded the correct one. [[:File:' 'Copied from' '- https---commons-wikimedia-org-wiki-File-Luis Pardo Villalón - Armada de Chile-png--br--' 'Original source' '- http---www-armada-cl-custom-pilotopardo-pilotopardo-html--br--' 'License' '- Th 2019-07-01 04-37.png|file]] --[[User:Capitalist.Chile|Capitalist.Chile]] ([[User talk:Capitalist.Chile|talk]]) 16:38, 4 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Done! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 23:10, 4 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Salute to America ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'Salute to America' articele - this was not a copy of Wikipedia, but independent research.  Your deletion is merely censorship.  too bad for conservapedia.  I was on a roll...  [[User:Let us eat lettuce|Let us eat lettuce]] ([[User talk:Let us eat lettuce|talk]]) 18:30, 6 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's a ridiculous response that will get you no respect from conservatives. I cross-checked [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Salute_to_America&amp;amp;oldid=905110556 the Wikipedia article], and you indeed copied the article (not the whole thing but only a condensed version. Your wording changes were far too minor to not consider it plagiarism. You also cited the same sources (from the MSM, by the way) for the same sentences.&lt;br /&gt;
:If you create an original article, citing conservative media sources (you know, the kind of information that will actually get censored on Wikipedia and other leftist websites), it won't get deleted. Another admin already deleted a previous article of yours for plagiarism, and I already (and kindly) warned you. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:36, 6 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Okay, you're &amp;quot;right&amp;quot;.  but my research was original.  maybe the same sources, is all.  [[User:Let us eat lettuce|Let us eat lettuce]] ([[User talk:Let us eat lettuce|talk]]) 18:47, 6 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The second version is even worse than the first (for a different reason). It's a stub; the wording is sloppy, poor, and vague; and you didn't cite any sources. If you cannot create a quality article citing multiple conservative media sources (Breitbart, TNA, Daily Caller, Daily Wire, Free Beacon, etc.) without having to consult Wikipedia or plagiarizing, you probably shouldn't create articles.&lt;br /&gt;
:::You saw my message on your talk page, as well as the welcome template with the various links. We're giving you multiple chances to improve. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:15, 6 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Don't make up rules. There is nothing that requires the use of &amp;quot;conservative media sources&amp;quot; in either the [[Conservapedia:Commandments|commandments]], the [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|guidelines]], the [[Conservapedia:Editing article and talk pages|manual of style]], or the [[Conservapedia:How to create and maintain high-quality articles|general guidance on &amp;quot;high-quality&amp;quot; articles]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your preferences are not policy. [[User:JohnZ|JohnZ]] ([[User talk:JohnZ|talk]]) 08:25, 7 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The 1990'sguy just deleted the article without contributing a thing.  On the article talk page, I had encouraged others to collaborate.  Not much collaboration here. [[User:Let us eat lettuce|Let us eat lettuce]] ([[User talk:Let us eat lettuce|talk]]) 08:37, 7 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::JohnZ, you don't get to decide what Conservapedia policy is (especially not if you're trying to force liberal POV again as you usually do).  That's for the admins to decide, not you. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 08:38, 7 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::@Let us eat lettuce: &amp;quot;encouraging others to collaborate&amp;quot; does not equal making others write 99% of an article (because it was a tiny, vague stub), or making a great effort to completely revamp the article because it was plagiarized.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::@JohnZ: I never said citing from the conservative media is a website requirement, but it's necessary if you want to create a quality article from a conservative point of view. And keep in mind that I told this to an editor who copied from Wikipedia, including, but not only, the citations (many new users do this, and I gave advice on how to write a good article). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:39, 7 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I don't get it anyway. What's the purpose of creating a Salute to America article? Is he going to create separate articles for every Forth of July celebration since 1776? Is there not enough news happening this Summer to write about? Is there not enough Trump news to write on?&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::If someone wants to trash Trump, be it on Wikipedia or here, don't be so lame and obvious about it. Get creative. Use some subtlety, ambiguity, and imagination. Goosestepping to liberal fascist talking points won't get you there. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:13, 7 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Nitpicking I know but==&lt;br /&gt;
Boris Johnson is not as yet The Prime Minister of the UK.--[[User:Chewy Suarez|Chewy Suarez]] ([[User talk:Chewy Suarez|talk]]) 13:48, 23 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I know -- his term starts tomorrow (really, in only a few hours now), but CP is a small wiki with few editors, so it's good to make all the necessary edits at once, and he'll become PM is so short a time from now that it really doesn't matter. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:51, 23 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Too fast on the trigger==&lt;br /&gt;
A couple of new editors have contributed some useful, albeit problematic, content. By reverting them instantly you may be scaring them off from participating further. My suggestion: try letting things develop and/or engage with them to develop proper editing skills. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:53, 28 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most wikis have adopted a Don't Bite the Newbies policy. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:59, 28 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's fair. That said, I don't want being friendly to newcomers to compromise CP's quality. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:10, 28 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, we need the newcomers to help improve quality. CP has nearly 50,000 articles now, and all could use some level of maintenance or improvement. We need to be more welcoming to newcomers and recognize there are different levels of editing skills. People volunteering their time should be treated with respect, engaged, and recruited into specific tasks to help improve the project. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I agree, but if they create an account and immediately start changing the POV of articles, plagiarize from Wikipedia, or make other unencyclopedic edits, we need to let them know. It's a two-way street -- we need to be welcoming, but the new user needs to be willing to learn and grow (I've seen new users unwilling to do that). --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:21, 28 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::This is where the rule of thumb, ''Discuss first, then revert'' comes in. Granted, there are users who insert commie agitprop that needs to be reverted instantly without discussion. Citations formatted from Wikipedia can be useful, the content needs to be reviewed. It's not a blanket rule. It's the speed at which a newbie is engaged that is intimidating  (I'd recommend [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221367707_Don't_bite_the_newbies_How_reverts_affect_the_quantity_and_quality_of_Wikipedia_work perusing]). &lt;br /&gt;
::::Here's were the subject matter a user is working on applies. If the user shows interest in conservative subjects, for instance, they may be only 14 years old and their understanding of conservativism is not fully developed. But they have enthusiasm for the subject. Being reverted can have a devastating effect. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''Deep Six the Deep State!'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:37, 28 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I won't argue over this any further -- it's not worth arguing over. I will try not to &amp;quot;bite&amp;quot; new users and to be more engaging with them -- that said, I hope you and Conservative don't go too far in the other direction. We can't go so far in that direction that edits that clearly violate CP guidelines and reduce its quality are tolerated purely to avoid offending someone. The user should be treated respectfully and kindly, but they should also be expected to learn from their mistakes and change their editing, if there is a problem. It's a two-way street. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:00, 28 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Added post ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi 1990'sguy, just wanted to say thank you for your suggestions about my articles: I'll keep them in mind in the future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know many of my contributions are rather boring ones, but my hope is to not just write about what I know, but create articles superior to their WP counterparts. Whatever helps steer more viewers this direction. -Teakin88&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome! I agree that your articles are better than Wikipedia's, and I think you've been a big help to CP. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:58, 29 July 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Cornell University==&lt;br /&gt;
What portions of the article do you believe were copied?  They seem completely different to me. Thanks, [[User:GChang|GChang]] ([[User talk:GChang|talk]]) 15:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:See [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Cornell_University&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1546023#Organization this] vs. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cornell_University&amp;amp;oldid=906741697#Organization_and_administration this] -- you clearly copied (as in, you knowingly took -- plagiarized -- content on WP and added it to CP). Rearranging certain paragraphs doesn't undo that fact that it's blatant plagarism. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 15:17, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I have made a side by side comparison at [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User%3AGChang%2FCU&amp;amp;diff=1546189&amp;amp;oldid=1546188].  I will hold off on editing until you identify what material constitutes impermissible copying from Wikipedia.  Some of what I did was based on past editing of Conservapedia, and not from Wikipedia.  By the way, footnotes and facts are not copyrighted.  Most sentences as well as the overall structure of the article is completely different.  Outline what you find to be copying and I will avoid those areas. Thank you. [[User:GChang|GChang]] ([[User talk:GChang|talk]]) 18:26, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Stop making sandbox pages when they're unnecessary. I have the permalinks above. The first four paragraphs on your CP version plus the sixth paragraph are identical to the paragraphs in that section of the Wikipedia article. You didn't even change the wikilinks from the WP page (hence the large number of red links on the CP page), though not including those red links wouldn't change the fact it's plagiarism. Changing the paragraphs' order or combining them -- as you did -- also doesn't change the fact that it's plagiarism. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 20:44, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I made the sandbox changes so that you can see all of the differences.  I don't see how they would be viewed as the same. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User%3AGChang%2FCU&amp;amp;diff=1546189&amp;amp;oldid=1546188]  Please look it over and give some feedback. Thanks, [[User:GChang|GChang]] ([[User talk:GChang|talk]]) 12:15, 17 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Minuteman has blocked me over Fredogate (Chris Cuomo) page, can someone help?  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone please help so I can improve the page I started? I've been blocked by Minuteman for creating the Fredogate page. No explanation was given and I find his censoring very frustrating since this incident some media personalities call Fredogate, is widely covered in youtube.--[[User:Bearbrau|Bearbrau]] ([[User talk:Bearbrau|talk]]) 19:19, 14 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are unblocked. Minuteman is a bot (not a human editor), and its block was accidental. You apparently made some edit that fit within the bot's computerized criteria for making blocks. The bot's human owner unblocked you, and the fact you're writing on my talk page shows that you've already been unblocked. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 19:27, 14 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Slovakia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I saw your edits on [[Slovakia]]. Thank you for taking time to correct my edits but I need to say I don't think writing &amp;quot;Slovakia (...) formed in 1993&amp;quot; is accurate.&lt;br /&gt;
*First, Slovakia is a name ascribed to the territory historically occupied by (mainly) Slovaks (slightly smaller than the territory of present-day Slovakia), so I think we should make that distinction somewhere in the beginning of the article. Thus, Slovakia (as a historical region) formed much earlier then 1990s.&lt;br /&gt;
*Secondly, Slovak Republic was legally created on January 1, 1969 as the Slovak Socialist Republic, then part of communist &amp;quot;federation&amp;quot; (it was not true federation, of course, but it was considered a separate legal entity), then turned from being a communist to democratic state in 1990 with its name constitutionally changed to Slovak Republic on March 1, 1990. On January 1, 1993, Slovak Republic as well as Czech Republic become independent states with Czechoslovak Republic no longer in existence.--[[User:RobSteff|RobSteff]] ([[User talk:RobSteff|talk]]) 18:08, 18 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I changed it. Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 18:27, 18 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you!--[[User:RobSteff|RobSteff]] ([[User talk:RobSteff|talk]]) 13:57, 19 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 700,000+ page views for Donald Trump achievements ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
700,000+ page views for Donald Trump achievements. Congratulations! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:20, 19 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 06:52, 20 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Great work in fixing those links! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Great work in fixing the Declaration of Independence links!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:46, 24 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:48, 24 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Template on Nationalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think a template on nationalism, as a counterweight to the template on globalism, would work well?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:06, 1 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think it would be helpful -- it could include links to articles like [[Border wall]], [[Economic nationalism]], [[Self-governance]], [[sovereignty]], [[National conservatism]], [[Euroskepticism]], [[Patriotism]], [[Subsidiarity]], [[Founding Fathers]], and [[U.S. Constitution]], among others. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:25, 1 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Dixiecrat, Conservative Democrat, and Reagan Democrat Pages ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;Dixiecrat was the informal term for Southern Democrats who in 1948 refused to support President Harry S. Truman for reelection because he was too liberal on racial issues.&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't it say because he was too conservative on racial issues since it was the '''liberal''' Democrats who were against civil rights?&lt;br /&gt;
:Truman desegrated the Armed Forces in 1947, so this one appears correct. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh. Because I thought that it was conservatives who were for desegregation and liberals who were for segregation. That's why I had a hard time understanding why it said Truman was too liberal on racial issues since the liberals were segregationists.&lt;br /&gt;
:Believe it or not, there are liberal segregationists.  It is not a demarcation line between liberal and conservative.&lt;br /&gt;
::The phrase &amp;quot;because he was '''too liberal''' on racial issues&amp;quot; kind of got me and I thought it was insisting that liberals were for desegregation and conservatives weren't.&lt;br /&gt;
:::The 1947 desegregation order marks a turning point in the liberal movement, but many liberals and alleged &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; (white folks riding the Democrat, anti-Republican welfare state and gravy train) remained segregationists, or at least racists. &lt;br /&gt;
::::This point deserves expanding on cause of recent developments: Many whites who wear the &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; label do so for government goodies, not social equality of blacks. We see it right now in support of various democrat candidates. Biden is buoyed by the black vote right now, and Biden ''is not'' promising a basketful of government goodies. Sanders, Warren, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker and Buttigieg are all promising wholesale government goodies, and getting the support of white &amp;quot;alleged liberals&amp;quot; - not blacks. Being &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; with other people's money, and being for civil rights and social equality, '''are not''' synonymous. Blacks know this more than anyone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::This was true during the [[New Deal Coalition]], the [[Great Society]], and today. Handing out food stamps to whites as well as blacks is not slave reparations, although since Great Society times whites who didn't qualify for food stamps viewed it as such. Or the creation of the [[Department of Housing and Urban Development]] in 1964, was viewed than as a poverty program for dispossessed blacks, yet today most of the funding goes to whites. Black's view white liberals as dishonest leeches, who plunder resources supposedly earmarked for them. The only thing they have in common is opposing Republicans who want to cut and balance the budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Blacks today are indeed the conservative, moderate, or centrist wing of the Democrat party, while white liberals are the [[far left]], handing the election to Trump. It will be one more grievance Blacks have against white Democrat liberals when it is all over. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:59, 22 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doesn't this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;The Dixiecrats went back to the Democrats, where they came into increasingly more conflict with the liberal sections of the party, and eventually abandoned the Democratic Party for the Republican Party after the presidency of Lyndon Johnson.&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
play into the liberal narrative that the racist conservatives switched parties and Dixiecrats were conservatives when in fact they were racist southern liberals?&lt;br /&gt;
:That's a misreading, but one this one needs some touching up. As is, it's a basic restatement of the [[fake news]] media, academia, and DNC false narrative of a Southern Strategy; Dixiecrat was basically a one-hit-wonder in 1948, when Democrats were divided 3 ways, Progressives, Dixiecrats, and Regular Democrats. What page is this on?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's on the [[Dixiecrat]] page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also have a hard time understanding the Time Magazine picture from 1968 on [[Curtis LeMay]] when it says &amp;quot;Revolt of the '''Right'''.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Curtis LeMay was George Wallace's VP pick in 1968; he was also [[Robert MacNamara]]'s (JFK &amp;amp; LBJ's defense secretary) boss during the Korean War. His nickname was the &amp;quot;Mad Bomber&amp;quot;. Both Nixon &amp;amp; Humphrey were running as &amp;quot;Peace candidates&amp;quot;. I don't recall Le May's politics off the top of my head, though I'm fairly certain he was not a Republican. Again, that's Prof. Jensen's work, and IMO, [[fake news]] from the 1960s intended to smear conservatives as warmongers, as usual (in fact, most conservatives are peaceniks and isolationists). We're in agreement, the page needs an overhaul.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the [[Reagan Democrats]] page, this feeds into the narrative that the racists jumped ships:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;Most were working men and women who had come to feel that the Democratic party was no longer championing them, but favored blacks instead.&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
:i see nothing wrong with this statement; and it's corroborated by the Stan Greenberg poll cited here just prior to the 1992 election: [https://www.salon.com/2016/01/31/the_clintons_sordid_race_game_no_one_will_say_it_but_the_clintons_rise_was_premised_on_repudiating_black_voters/ The Clintons’ sordid race game: No one will say it, but the Clintons’ rise was premised on repudiating black voters], Corey Robin, ''Salon'', Jan 31, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the [[Conservative Democrat]] page, it says:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;A few former Dixiecrats, including Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms, were early converts to the Republican Party, foreshadowing a long trend of conservatives leaving the Democrats and joining the Republicans that continued through the 1980s and 1990s.&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
:Good point; looks like Prof. Jensen's work; [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiprVX4os2Y Prof. Carol Swain of PragerU] refutes the notion three switched and says only one. And Helms association as a Dixiecrat I'd have to look into. There's much of Prof. Jensen's work I've been meaning to revise, beginning with [[New Deal Coalition]] and [[Conservative Coalition]] which carries a  lot of the historical revisionist basis for the alleged GOP Southern Strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought only 3 Dixiecrats ever switched. The rest remained Democrats until they died. There was no switch and the Dixiecrats were not conservatives. They were liberals. Can you please explain why these pages insist they were conservatives who were opposed to the liberals when it's us, the conservatives who were for civil rights and the liberals who were against it or clarify the edits on the pages made by DavidB4-bot? And on Joe Biden's page, it says '''a coalition of liberals and George Wallace supporters''' and I thought they were one and the same. --[[User:Classical Liberal|Classical Liberal]] ([[User talk:Classical Liberal|talk]]) 10:10, 21 September 2019 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Dixiecrats were racist Southern New Dealers; there were both conservatives and liberals among them. Most importantly, they were anti-Republican, a legacy of Reconstruction. And as Prof. Swain says, only one Senator ever switched. Strom Thurmond himself was a liberal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't understand how conservatives could be among the Dixiecrats. Conservatives were against the New Deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:To understand the meaning of Dixiecrat, one should read the articles on 1948 and 1964 Democratic conventions, and the 1964 Mississippi Freedom Party. Johnson didn't want a replay of 1948 in 1964. Hubert Humphrey cut his teeth as a civil rights leader in his 1948 speech (as [[David Horowitz]] also was inspired). By 1964, the Dixiecrat movement was dead, and only Strom Thurmond - a Southern New Deal liberal - left the party to join the GOP). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:22, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for letting me know about this. I'll see what we can do to improve CP's coverage on this topic. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 14:51, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Dixiecrat is basically one of the those journalistic terms that takes on its own life and lives on in infamy; in 1948 Truman, [[Henry Wallace]], and Strom Thurmond all claimed the mantle of Democrat; the press assigned labels to distinguish them.&lt;br /&gt;
::Strom Thurmond would be the first to deny he was a &amp;quot;Dixiecrat', given the definition journalists assigned to it. He'd argue he was Democrat, loyal to the Democrat party ideals and traditions. &lt;br /&gt;
::[[Cokie Roberts]], who just died and her obituary lauds her as a feminist pioneer in political journalism, reared as the daughter of a longtime Democrat Majority Leader, doesn't mention she was reared by her father [[Hale Boggs]] (signer of the [[Southern Manifesto]]) in the Dixiecrat tradition. Cokie Roberts, raised in a Dixiecrat household by parents who'' both'' served in the House (her mother succeeded her father), owed her entire success and career to the political education she received from her parents, and never rebelled against it.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Which of coarse brings us to a discussion of Louisiana Democrat politics and its godfather, Huey &amp;quot;Every Man a King (&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;except blacks&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;)&amp;quot; Long, his place in the history of American Socialism, and his successors in Louisiana-style politics and demagoguery, notable among several, [[James Carville]]... [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:39, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gop-plank.JPG|thumb|275px|1936 cartoon shows GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
:And I have one more question. On the [[Conservative]] page, is this picture accurate? &lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not exactly sure of Prof. Jensen's reasoning there; I'd say it is related to the Democrat Congress in 1931 turning down Herbert Hoover's relief efforts at the start of the Great Depression, paving the way to blaming Hoover for the Depression in the 1932 election. But some it can go back as far as the creation of the Federal Reserve Board after the 1912 elections, or even the Cross of Gold speech of William Jennings Bryan in 1896. &amp;quot;Sound Money&amp;quot; in that context refers to an anti-inflationist gold standard; I don't know when Democrats ever were &amp;quot;Sound Money&amp;quot; anti-inflationists, other than when they nixed Hoover's relief efforts or passed the Federal Reserve Act (but even there, that's debatable whether the Federal Reserve Act was inflationary or for maintaining a rigid gold standard).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the whole, I've debated with myself for years about removing some of Prof. Jensen's work, cause I regard him as a qualified historian. Only when I'm armed with the facts do I challenge some of his biases or excesses. And he does have a habit of using what I regard as biased fake news sources going back as far as 1936. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:55, 21 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for the info. I'm learning a lot from on here and I'm still learning. I'm just trying to get a better understanding is all. I love your and 1990'sguy's edits. Keep up the good work guys!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Classical Liberal|Classical Liberal]] ([[User talk: Classical Liberal|talk]]) 22:20, 21 September 2019 (CDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you, I appreciate it! And thanks for coming to my talk page to discuss it and get a better understanding! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 07:38, 22 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thank you==&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for tidying up the link to [[Alister Hardy]] on the page on the [[Templeton Prize]]. [[User:Carltonio|Carltonio]] ([[User talk:Carltonio|talk]]) 11:41, 26 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 11:44, 26 September 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's start off on a clean slate as far as User: BernieandTrumpfan==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I put the below post on the talk page of User: BernieandTrumpfan:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell you what. Let's just start off with a clean slate. I deleted my previous remarks. I don't forsee deleting any more of your content. I just thought the errors of fact in these articles were not by accident: [[Agnosticism, deism, and confusion]] and [[List of Social Darwinists]]. I will assume your edits are good faith henceforth plus 1990sguy said he would review your future edits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I probably was too quick on the draw in determining some of your errant edits were made in bad faith (agnosticism has caused many people to become insane with the footnotes not supporting that, Yasser Arafat is a social Darwinist, etc.). My apologies if I made a mistake. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will not restore those articles two articles above because they had some quality issues, but I did restore the mainspace articles/essays I could find. I turned [[Atheism and chaos]] into an essay.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 21:50, 1 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I restored all but 2 of BernieandTrump fan articles/essays.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 09:26, 2 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ted Cruz edit ==&lt;br /&gt;
Calm down, please. At that time, I used the 'Stop Left Wing Newspeak' extension. It automatically changes some words. I reverted it immediately, and changed the preferences of the extension. Please do not lose your temper over a minor mistake. I am only trying to improve Conservapedia, and your unpleasant reaction has put me off a little. -- [[User:Toby Chester|Toby Chester]] ([[User talk:Toby Chester|talk]]) 01:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Something you might be able to use==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Trump-wage-growth-1.jpg |right|300px|thumb|Wage growth among low income workers has been double that of high income workers under President Trump.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics'']]&lt;br /&gt;
You might be able o use this somewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|De Plorabus Unum]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:51, 5 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Will do! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 22:53, 5 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Why right-wing populism will triumph ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/whats-behind-the-rise-of-radicalism-here-are-some-theories/2019/10/09/d88f4c62-eac2-11e9-9c6d-436a0df4f31d_story.html What’s behind the rise of radicalism? Here are some theories] By Megan McArdle, ''Washington Post'', Oct. 9, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://quillette.com/2019/05/27/how-progressivism-enabled-the-rise-of-the-populist-right/ How Progressivism Enabled the Rise of the Populist Right], [[Eric Kaufmann]], ''Quillette'', 2019&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/09/08/shawn-rosenberg-democracy-228045 The Shocking Paper Predicting the End of Democracy], By RICK SHENKMAN, ''Politico'',  September 08, 2019&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/08/10/the-rise-of-populism-shouldnt-have-surprised-anyone/ The rise of populism shouldn’t have surprised anyone], ''Washington Post'', 2017&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.businessinsider.com/global-recession-could-boost-far-right-populism-in-us-worldwide-2019-8 Trump rode an 'us versus them' populism all the way to the White House. A global recession could take it to dangerous levels], ''Business Insider'', 2019&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/interview/civic-tech-expert-the-alliance-between-new-media-and-anti-establishment-forces-is-powerful/ Civic tech guru: Trump, Breitbart and populism are ‘the new normal’], 2017&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I thought you might find these articles interesting.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 12:28, 28 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 12:30, 28 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::It seems like the media elites are starting to come out of their denialism and are beginning to recognize that right-wing populism is not a temporary blip on the radar.[[User:Wikignome72|Wikignome72]] ([[User talk:Wikignome72|talk]]) 12:34, 28 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fred Schiele ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for correcting my mistakes in [[Fred Schiele]] article. Didn't notice the Louisiana people category. --[[User:Orb|Orb]] ([[User talk:Orb|talk]]) 13:41, 30 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Steven_Levitt&amp;diff=1589174</id>
		<title>Steven Levitt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Steven_Levitt&amp;diff=1589174"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:38:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Re-adding category people. Like Living people&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Steven Levitt''' (born May 29, 1967) is a [[liberal]] economist and co-author of ''[[Freakonomics]]'', a book falsely claiming legalized [[abortion]] contributed to a drop in the crime rate in the 1990s (a phenomenon accurately attributed to [[conservative]] social policies). Levitt's theory has been compared to [[Eugenics]].{{who says}}  He supports the privatization of prison labor and online gambling, opposes teachers' unions, and denies climate change.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://shameproject.com/profile/steven-d-levitt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was born May 29, 1967, attended St. Paul University and graduated from Harvard University with a B.A. in economics in 1989, and received a Ph.D. from the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/steven-levitt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Levitt, Steven}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Jews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Jewish Authors]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BHathorn&amp;diff=1589172</id>
		<title>User talk:BHathorn</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:BHathorn&amp;diff=1589172"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:36:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: /*  Fred Schiele‎ */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 10:18, 4 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I assume you wrote them.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 20:56, 22 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I am the author of the two articles. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 22:43, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Then how is it that a Wikipedia editor doesn't know how to format pages? [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 12:08, 30 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anita Perry ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The section you've added about her brother is almost half of the article, and would probably fit better in  the Rick Perry and/or G.W. Bush articles. It was the interaction between the men that's caused whatever stress there might be. The way the section in the article is written, Mrs. Perry doesn't appear to be involved at all, other than being a sister and wife. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:08, 30 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article format ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've tried to fix the formatting and references on your article [[Chuck Hopson]]. Please take the time to correct your other articles, and try to use the correct formatting on any new articles you write. Thanks! --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:53, 30 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Articles from WP ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you please attribute them from WP written by you on the talk page? There's a template for it, and I'll find you the link. Thanks!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 19:02, 13 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Copied from|site=|user=|site user=}} &lt;br /&gt;
::There you go!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 19:06, 13 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Congratulations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations, your account has been granted extra rights (blocking and SkipCatcha)!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 23:03, 15 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bryan Hughes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bryan Hughes]] article you wrote needs to have the in-line references fixed. Was it copy/pasted from somewhere? If it was, and you wrote the original, the talk page needs a disclaimer. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:50, 24 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit reversion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm curious why you reversed my edit about the name format for Ray Garofalo? The proper format for names is '''First Middle &amp;quot;Nickname&amp;quot; Last&amp;quot;. [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:03, 11 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know what was done. The name was misspelled &amp;quot;Garofolo in the heading, and I corrected it to Garofalo. I did not know that I had altered the name. Sorry for the confusion. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 18:16, 11 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Shreveport Journal. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Shreveport_Journal&amp;amp;curid=123027&amp;amp;diff=1005524&amp;amp;oldid=1005329 Any reason why you took out these ref tags?] [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 21:29, 11 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No, I don't know what happened. The article could not be edited on Sept. 11. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 22:15, 11 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reference tags, again? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Carlos_Truan&amp;amp;curid=123326&amp;amp;diff=1006241&amp;amp;oldid=1005996 This edit] leaves all kinds of weird stuff in the text of the article. what are you trying to do? [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 11:38, 14 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you saying not to use &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; ?  Many of the current articles I checked are not allowing editing today. [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 01:25, 15 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This one is really weird as well... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Look at [[Four Price]] after you made [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Four_Price&amp;amp;curid=104177&amp;amp;diff=1006350&amp;amp;oldid=940392 this edit]]. As they say, &amp;quot;that ain't right. Please, tell me what you're trying to do with the references and I'll try to help you out, but right now, it looks unreadable. Thanks! [[User:MattyD|MattyD]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;I was just updating the story and putting &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; in front of cite web and &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; at the end of the reference. In the past this has been no problem, but for the past two weeks, it causes the story to go haywire, and the &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; disappear. Some of the stories, such as Gene Reynolds and A. Roswell Thompson, are also locked up and can't be edited.&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 10:50, 15 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have repaired Price, Reynolds, Thompson and will check on others. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 11:50, 15 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NOTICE:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MattyD, Can you permit me back into Conservapedia. I can only access it at the public library; not at home. Thanks, [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 15:39, 19 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:No, I cannot. You need to ask an admin: ASchlafly, Karajou, Ed Poor, Conservative, JPatt, etc... [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 15:47, 19 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Browser issues==&lt;br /&gt;
Do you use the same browser at both home and in the library? What browser do you have at home? Do you have a javascript plugin installed in your browser? Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 06:06, 21 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know about the brower, but once again as of Sept. 21, I can access Conservapedia at home. Thanks, [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 08:38, 21 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for your patience.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 12:07, 21 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Articles you've created. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not 100% sure about this, but I believe that articles about cities are titled just by the name of the city. You've created a bunch that are titled &amp;quot;City, State.&amp;quot; You might want to see if you can bring them in line with the existing style. Peace, etc. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 12:00, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What about cities with the same name in various states? [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 12:02, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Like [[Portland]]? [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 12:04, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::You may have to set up redirects or get a sysop to move the articles for you--it's the titles that need to be changed more that the first sentence. [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 12:07, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::It should be a case by case thing. Portland is also an historic port-city in Victoria, Australia. There is the famous [[Alexandria]] in [[Egypt]]. And so on. Click on [[Kingston]] - there are many many more towns and cities of that name around the world founded by Brits during the colonial era and named after their home town. I would mention the state unless you are sure it is unique. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 18:45, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::An example of what can happen. In March 2007 an edit to [[Archimedes]] mentioned the tyrant of Syracuse with a red link to Syracuse. In October 2007 an article was created for Syracuse New York, heading: [[Syracuse]] This enlivened the link in the Archimedes article to make it look (to the very ignorant) as if he lived in upstate New York. It's fixable but would not have happened if the American city had been headed &amp;quot;Syracuse N.Y.&amp;quot; or similar. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 19:37, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I also favor the city, state format for article names. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 21:42, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Does Conservapedia not use disambiguation pages for such things? [[User:MattyD|MattyD]] 21:57, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Yes it does. But Conservapedia is not particularly good at &amp;quot;paperwork&amp;quot;. Everyone is focused on their own little realm. The person who wrote &amp;quot;Archimedes&amp;quot; didn't give a toss about the chance that someone would enliven the Sicilian Syracuse with the American one. There were editors who cared but one by one they disappeared or were rooted out by TK because they had possibly shown up across the road at you-know-where at some stage. There is one still editing - WesleyS (hi Wes!) - but he can't be everywhere. Look, let's talk on my [[User:AlanE|talk page]]. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 22:34, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Archimedes has his home back, and it's not in New York; try making good corrections to paperwork, and don't worry too much about someone else's &amp;quot;realm&amp;quot;.  There's always something else to add to  :)  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 23:08, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thank you for taking the time to fix this.  To me, we all owe a duty to our users/readers.  That should motivate us to leave our own comfort zones in order to build a better encyclopedia overall, rather than &amp;quot;realm&amp;quot; by &amp;quot;realm&amp;quot;. [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 23:34, 25 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Yes, thanks. Perhaps not so much &amp;quot;realms&amp;quot; as demesnes. Every time I have come across a failure in the &amp;quot;paperwork&amp;quot; I have either fixed it or tried to bring it to someone's attention. It hasn't always worked. If you were to [[guddle]] into my edits over the years you would come across my frustration. I have been banned for this, because I haven't always been &amp;quot;polite&amp;quot; in my frustration. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 00:43, 26 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Cattle Kate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why does this article seem to be about someone called annie instead of kate ? Also why are these articles being copied directly from wikipedia ? [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 21:25, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
: All you articles should also be classed as copied articles as they are from WP [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 21:28, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I was just wondering about the 'Kate' thing as well.  [[User:WesleyS|WesleyS]][[User Talk:WesleyS|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Hello!&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]] 21:30, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: Again I ask the question why where the articles you are posting deleted from wikipedia ?  Can you please answer this question ? Can you also start using the ''copied from'' template. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 21:51, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I was blocked from Wikipedia, and the articles were removed. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 21:55, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: And what was the reason for the blockage ? What username did you use when creating these articles ? [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 21:56, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There really was no reason that I understand. They said I violated copyright by not paraphrasing properly in several instances, but I did not. I gave attribution and gave the notations. I used the name &amp;quot;The Good Grinch&amp;quot;. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 21:58, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Again can I ask you to use this; &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;:{{Copied from|site=Wikipedia|user=BHathorn|site user=}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; template instead of adding a talk page message ! [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 21:59, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do I still use this &amp;quot;&amp;quot;Copied&amp;quot;  if the article is not on Wikipedia? If so, where do I put this label? (unsigned by  [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: You would, however you would change to &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;|site=&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; to the site in which it was copied from. You also need to make sure that it was copied legally and not illegally. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 22:09, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dvergne, I did not actually copy the articles from Wikipedia. I had them on my own computer file and adjusted the links, etc. It is impossible to copy these articles from Wikipedia, as there is no trace of them there. If I did not have my own copies of the articles, they would have been lost. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 22:16, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Fair enough, I suggest you add this experience to the some of the censorship at wikipedia articles here. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 22:26, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If I added my experiences with Wikipedia, it would take many, many screens and would bore you to tears. I doubt many would believe me any way. Ultimately, I can't figure out how Wikipedia stays afloat considering the way it treats the writers. Any writer there must have his own agenda, whether he admits it or not, and one's agenda may not be in line with the grand poo-bahs there. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] 23:13, 3 January 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Do you still need help accessing Conservapedia at home?  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you still need help accessing Conservapedia at home?  Is your IP blocked? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:16, 22 November 2014 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How to download photos==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can't find the directions on downloading photos. Can someone direct me to the instructions? Thanks, [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] ([[User talk:BHathorn|talk]]) 11:37, 2 May 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is a bit of an old question--I don't know if you've gotten your answer yet.  I don't know of any directions on CP, though other sites such as [http://www.wikihow.com/Download-Pictures-from-a-Website wikihow] offer some.  In general, right-click on the image and select the option labeled something like &amp;quot;Save image as...&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Save as...&amp;quot;  You may find this option labeled differently between different Internet browsers.  They you simply select a location on your computer to save the file, and click the &amp;quot;save&amp;quot; button.  In Chromium-based browsers such as Google Chrome, you may need to download it first, then find it in the bottom bar of your browser and move it to somewhere you can get at later.  Does this help? --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:17, 29 July 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
I don't look at my user page much, and just saw your question.  DavidB4 told you how to download a photo '''from''' Conservapedia.  I suspect that you want to upload photos '''to''' Conservapedia. First, find a photo that you can share (perhaps following the instructions above) or the URL of the photo on flickr or Wikimedia Commons.  Then leave a message on [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]] and DavidB4 will upload it for you and tell you the name of the file that he created. Thanks for all that you do for CP. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 14:13, 29 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009.  It is now registered and somewhat set up.  I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel.  Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering.  In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later.  If you are interested, please let me know!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:41, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New Template ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello. I'd just like to inform you that it would be greatly beneficial if you were to assist on working on the following newly created template;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Template:Bible Cities]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This template was created less than a week ago, and is an attempt to record all the biblical cities of the Old and New Testaments. It would be helpful if you, and other fellow editors at Conservapedia, were to assist in creating articles describing these biblical cities. If you are willing to start making some of these pages, but are not exactly sure how to approach the task, I'd suggest looking at [[Rhegium]] or [[Beeroth]], two very (very) recent pages created by myself ([[Shaaraim]] is another good example) to get a good understanding at how this thing should be done. If you're willing to go above and beyond, take a look at the page [[Amphipolis]], perhaps the best biblical city page to date. Just to note, this request is optional and you may help out on your own volition.[[User:Korvex|Korvex]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Attribution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
I see that several of the articles you have been publishing (including [[Ray Hunkins]] and [[Gene Reynolds]]) contain text which is very similar to some which is already available elsewhere on the internet.  Are you the original author of this text, and just spreading it around?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:43, 4 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, original author. The Ray Hunkins bio was deleted in 2016 from Wikipedia. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] ([[User talk:BHathorn|talk]]) 23:31, 4 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, so then other people copied it from Wikipedia.  That seems to makes sense.  Alright, thanks for clarifying that! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:06, 5 September 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== please backup your recent edits ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please try to either save a copy of your edits, or just refrain from editing for the next 24 hours or so. Conservapedia is changing web servers, and there is a risk that pages might be exported before you make the change, meaning your change will be lost. Thanks for understanding! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:48, 12 March 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, I was blocked here... My original username used to be [[User:kingdamian1 |kingdamian1]]. I wish to get unblocked now, and I regret stupid things I may have done. Is there any way for us to discuss my block? Thanks --[[User:Making Idan|Making Idan]] ([[User talk:Making Idan|talk]]) 15:20, 9 July 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What can I do to help? I don't recall your situation. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] ([[User talk:BHathorn|talk]]) 16:55, 9 July 2018 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Change title name==&lt;br /&gt;
I need to change the title of [[Douglas F. Attaway, Jr.]], to [[Douglas Fisher Attaway]]. He is apparently not a &amp;quot;junior&amp;quot; because his middle name is his mother's maiden name. Can someone do this? Thanks[[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] ([[User talk:BHathorn|talk]]) 08:31, 6 March 2019 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Uploading rights granted ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi BHathorn!  You've been granted uploading privileges.  Please be sure to give proper attribution, identify the license, and provide a link back to the source.  Images on Wikipedia have an icon to click to see the information required for attribution.  Enjoy your new privileges!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 23:12, 2 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:P.S. Please by uploading only images having a &amp;quot;CC&amp;quot; license, or Public Domain (&amp;quot;PD&amp;quot;).  Please ask first on my talk page if you ever want to assert &amp;quot;[[fair use]]&amp;quot; for copying images, and let's not start with any of those.  Thanks!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:41, 3 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Where are the steps to follow for unloading==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know where to begin with uploading; need instructions. Thanks. [[User:BHathorn|BHathorn]] ([[User talk:BHathorn|talk]]) 07:19, 3 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please don't upload files bigger than 100k.  The instructions are self-explanatory [[Special:Upload|here]].  Thanks.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 09:49, 3 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::If you have any specific questions, need step-by-step directions, want me to review an image license, or anything else, let me know! I can also look over images which are copyrighted, to give you my opinion on whether or not they can be used here.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::Let me know if I can help! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;DavidB4&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:04, 3 August 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  Fred Schiele‎ ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where did you get the information that you have added to this article? The Wikipedia page was recently deleted because of some copyright violation. If you could provide a link for me that would be very appreciative. --[[User:Orb|Orb]] ([[User talk:Orb|talk]]) 13:36, 30 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Schiele&amp;diff=1589170</id>
		<title>Fred Schiele</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Schiele&amp;diff=1589170"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:34:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Adding category people&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name= Fred Lyle “Buddy” Schiele, Sr.​&lt;br /&gt;
|office=[[Louisiana]] State Representative&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for Concordia Parish ​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=1964 ​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=1968​&lt;br /&gt;
|preceded=S. P. &amp;quot;Jack&amp;quot; Crane​&lt;br /&gt;
|succeeded=David I. Patten​&lt;br /&gt;
|office2=[[Sheriff]] of Concordia Parish​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start2=April 6, 1973​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end2=July 1980​&lt;br /&gt;
|preceded2=Noah W. Cross​&lt;br /&gt;
|succeeded2=John Patrick​&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=November 28, 1933​&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Vidalia, Concordia Parish&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Louisiana]], [[United States|USA]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=[[Alexandria, Louisiana|Alexandria]], Rapides Parish, Louisiana​&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=January 24, 2002 (aged 68)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|resting_place=Natchez City Cemetery in Natchez, [[Mississippi]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|residence=Vidalia and Alexandria, Louisiana​&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democratic Party|Democrat]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[United Methodist]] ​&lt;br /&gt;
|occupation=[[Farmer]]; [[Sheriff]]|spouse= Maxine Smith Schiele (married 1954-2002, his death)​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Children''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Fred Schiele, Jr.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Carole Ann Schiele Rice&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Patricia Leigh Schiele&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Alan Maxwell Schiele&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Steven Lowery Schiele, II&lt;br /&gt;
|alma_mater=Vidalia High School&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Louisiana State University]]&lt;br /&gt;
|footnotes='''Notes''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Schiele had already been a one-term state representative, when his former legislative colleague, [[Governor]] [[Edwin Edwards]], tapped him to succeed Noah W. Cross as [[sheriff]] of Schiele’s native Concordia Parish in eastern [[Louisiana]].​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Schiele managed Edwards’ [[Governor|gubernatorial]] campaign in Concordia Parish in 1971-1972.​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* After his seven years as sheriff, Shiele completed his college degree later in life and was employed thereafter by the Louisiana Department of Corrections. ​&lt;br /&gt;
}}​&lt;br /&gt;
'''Fred Lyle Schiele, Sr.''', known also as '''Buddy Schiele''' (November 28, 1933 &amp;amp;ndash; January 24, 2002), served from 1964 to 1968 as a [[Democratic Party|Democratic]] state representative for Concordia Parish in eastern [[Louisiana]] adjacent to the [[Mississippi River]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://house.louisiana.gov/H_PDFdocs/HouseMembership_History_CURRENT.pdf|title=Membership in the Louisiana House of Representatives, 1880-2020|publisher=Louisiana House of Representatives|accessdate=October 30, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
​&lt;br /&gt;
Schiele (pronounced SHE LEE) did not seek reelection in the 1967 [[primary]] election but instead unsuccessfully opposed [[incumbent]] [[Sheriff]] Noah W. Cross of Ferriday, also in Concordia Parish. He won the sheriff's position in 1973 after Cross resigned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
Schiele was one of four sons born in Vidalia in Concordia Parish, to Catesby Edward Schiele and the former Lucille Rountree (1897-1977). In 1951, he graduated from Vidalia High School. Thirty years later, at the age of forty-eight, he procured his bachelor’s degree in business administration from [[Louisiana State University]] in [[Baton Rouge]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Statement of Fred Schiele, Jr., July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prior to his involvement in politics, Schiele ran a [[cotton]] gin in Ferriday. He also served on the board of First Federal Savings and Loan in Vidalia.&amp;lt;ref name=cs/&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1954, Schiele married the former Maxine Smith (1937-2009), a 1955 graduate of Vidalia High School. The couple had five children: Fred Schiele, Jr. (born 1955), a former deputy sheriff for his father and the appointed chief of police in Ferriday, who later entered the trucking business in [[Dallas]], [[Texas]]; Carole Ann Schiele Rice (born 1960) and Patricia Leigh Schiele (born 1962), both of Loranger in Tangipahoa Parish; Alan Maxwell Schiele (born 1964), a deputy sheriff in East Baton Rouge Parish, and Steven Lowery Schiele, II (born 1975) of Port Vincent, a [[village]] in Livingston Parish. Steven is named for Steven Schiele, I, a first cousin who was killed in an [[automobile]] accident in 1971. There were also three grandchildren and one great-grandchild.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;'Fred Schiele, ''The Alexandria Town Talk,'' January 5, 2002;  statement of Maxine Smith Schiele, July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political life ==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 6, 1973, more than five years after he first ran for sheriff of Concordia Parish, Schiele was appointed to the office by [[Governor]] [[Edwin Edwards]], pending a [[special election]], after incumbent Noah Cross was forced to resign after twenty-five years in office because of the failure of the [[appeal]] of his federal conviction of [[perjury]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Concordia Sentinel,'' April 11, 1973, p. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Edwards settled on Schiele because the former legislator had successfully managed Edwards' 1971-1972 [[Governor|gubernatorial]] campaign in Concordia Parish.&amp;lt;ref name=cs&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Schiele to Succeed Cross in Appointment,&amp;quot; ''The Concordia Sentinel,'' April 4, 1973, p. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sheriff Schiele won a full term in the 1975 election, but he was unseated in 1979 by fellow Democrat John Patrick, an [[insurance]] agent. He then completed his college degree and was employed thereafter by the Probation and Paroles section of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety. Schiele attempted a comeback in 1987 when he challenged incumbent Sheriff Hubert Lee McGlothin (1940-2004), who had previously been the  [[mayor]] of Ferriday. In the 1987 contest, Schiele polled 1,155 votes (12.8 percent).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Louisiana Secretary of State, Election Returns, October 24, 1987.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McGlothin resigned midway in his second term as sheriff as a result of a criminal conviction. The Concordia Parish Police Jury, the parish governing body, then appointed Randy Maxwell, effective August 31, 1990, to serve until a special election was held on March 21, 1991. In that all-Democrat contest, Maxwell defeated Schiele, 4,619 (62.9 percent) to 1,900 (25.9 percent). Two other candidates shared the remaining 11.3 percent of the vote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Louisiana Secretary of State, Election Returns, March 23, 1991.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Maxwell was unopposed in the nonpartisan blanket primary for sheriff on October 19, 1991, and has since remained in the position though he has had close elections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.concordiasentinel.com/news.php?id=807|title=Joey Martin|title=Randy Maxwell: 'Still a lot to do'|publisher=''The Concordia Sentine''|date=October 18, 2007; no longer on-line}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
The probation and paroles division relocated the Schiele's to [[Alexandria, Louisiana|Alexandria]], where he died of a massive heart attack at the age of sixty-eight. He was a [[United Methodist]]. After her husband’s death, Mrs. Schiele, a native of Natchez, [[Mississippi]], moved to  Loranger to be near her two daughters. Schiele, like Sheriff Cross his predecessor, is interred at the Natchez City Cemetery across the Mississippi River from Vidalia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Natchez City Cemetery records, Natchez, Mississippi.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schiele, Fred}}​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Louisiana People]]​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Farmers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democrats]]​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Methodists]]​&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Schiele&amp;diff=1589167</id>
		<title>Fred Schiele</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Schiele&amp;diff=1589167"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:27:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Simplifying page. Fixing grammatical errors&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name= Fred Lyle “Buddy” Schiele, Sr.​&lt;br /&gt;
|office=[[Louisiana]] State Representative&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for Concordia Parish ​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=1964 ​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=1968​&lt;br /&gt;
|preceded=S. P. &amp;quot;Jack&amp;quot; Crane​&lt;br /&gt;
|succeeded=David I. Patten​&lt;br /&gt;
|office2=[[Sheriff]] of Concordia Parish​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start2=April 6, 1973​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end2=July 1980​&lt;br /&gt;
|preceded2=Noah W. Cross​&lt;br /&gt;
|succeeded2=John Patrick​&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=November 28, 1933​&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Vidalia, Concordia Parish&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Louisiana]], [[United States|USA]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=[[Alexandria, Louisiana|Alexandria]], Rapides Parish, Louisiana​&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=January 24, 2002 (aged 68)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Resting place''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Natchez City Cemetery in Natchez, [[Mississippi]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|residence=Vidalia and Alexandria, Louisiana​&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democratic Party|Democrat]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[United Methodist]] ​&lt;br /&gt;
|occupation=[[Farmer]]; [[Sheriff]]|spouse= Maxine Smith Schiele (married 1954-2002, his death)​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Children''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Fred Schiele, Jr.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Carole Ann Schiele Rice&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Patricia Leigh Schiele&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Alan Maxwell Schiele&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Steven Lowery Schiele, II&lt;br /&gt;
|alma_mater=Vidalia High School&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Louisiana State University]]&lt;br /&gt;
|footnotes='''Notes''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Schiele had already been a one-term state representative, when his former legislative colleague, [[Governor]] [[Edwin Edwards]], tapped him to succeed Noah W. Cross as [[sheriff]] of Schiele’s native Concordia Parish in eastern [[Louisiana]].​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Schiele managed Edwards’ [[Governor|gubernatorial]] campaign in Concordia Parish in 1971-1972.​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* After his seven years as sheriff, Shiele completed his college degree later in life and was employed thereafter by the Louisiana Department of Corrections. ​&lt;br /&gt;
}}​&lt;br /&gt;
'''Fred Lyle Schiele, Sr.''', known also as '''Buddy Schiele''' (November 28, 1933 &amp;amp;ndash; January 24, 2002), served from 1964 to 1968 as a [[Democratic Party|Democratic]] state representative for Concordia Parish in eastern [[Louisiana]] adjacent to the [[Mississippi River]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://house.louisiana.gov/H_PDFdocs/HouseMembership_History_CURRENT.pdf|title=Membership in the Louisiana House of Representatives, 1880-2020|publisher=Louisiana House of Representatives|accessdate=October 30, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
​&lt;br /&gt;
Schiele (pronounced SHE LEE) did not seek reelection in the 1967 primary election but instead unsuccessfully opposed [[incumbent]] [[Sheriff]] Noah W. Cross of Ferriday, also in Concordia Parish. He won the sheriff's position in 1973 after Cross resigned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
Schiele was one of four sons born in Vidalia in Concordia Parish, to Catesby Edward Schiele and the former Lucille Rountree (1897-1977). In 1951, he graduated from Vidalia High School. Thirty years later, at the age of forty-eight, he procured his bachelor’s degree in business administration from [[Louisiana State University]] in [[Baton Rouge]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Statement of Fred Schiele, Jr., July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prior to his involvement in politics, Schiele ran a [[cotton]] gin in Ferriday. He also served on the board of First Federal Savings and Loan in Vidalia.&amp;lt;ref name=cs/&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1954, Schiele married the former Maxine Smith (1937-2009), a 1955 graduate of Vidalia High School. The couple had five children: Fred Schiele, Jr. (born 1955), a former deputy sheriff for his father and the appointed chief of police in Ferriday, who later entered the trucking business in [[Dallas]], [[Texas]]; Carole Ann Schiele Rice (born 1960) and Patricia Leigh Schiele (born 1962), both of Loranger in Tangipahoa Parish; Alan Maxwell Schiele (born 1964), a deputy sheriff in East Baton Rouge Parish, and Steven Lowery Schiele, II (born 1975) of Port Vincent, a [[village]] in Livingston Parish. Steven is named for Steven Schiele, I, a first cousin who was killed in an [[automobile]] accident in 1971. There were also three grandchildren and one great-grandchild.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;'Fred Schiele, ''The Alexandria Town Talk,'' January 5, 2002;  statement of Maxine Smith Schiele, July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political life ==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 6, 1973, more than five years after he first ran for sheriff of Concordia Parish, Schiele was appointed to the office by [[Governor]] [[Edwin Edwards]], pending a [[special election]], after incumbent Noah Cross was forced to resign after twenty-five years in office because of the failure of the [[appeal]] of his federal conviction of [[perjury]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Concordia Sentinel,'' April 11, 1973, p. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Edwards settled on Schiele because the former legislator had successfully managed Edwards' 1971-1972 [[Governor|gubernatorial]] campaign in Concordia Parish.&amp;lt;ref name=cs&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Schiele to Succeed Cross in Appointment,&amp;quot; ''The Concordia Sentinel,'' April 4, 1973, p. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sheriff Schiele won a full term in the 1975 election, but he was unseated in 1979 by fellow Democrat John Patrick, an [[insurance]] agent. He then completed his college degree and was employed thereafter by the Probation and Paroles section of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety. Schiele attempted a comeback in 1987 when he challenged incumbent Sheriff Hubert Lee McGlothin (1940-2004), who had previously been the  [[mayor]] of Ferriday. In the 1987 contest, Schiele polled 1,155 votes (12.8 percent).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Louisiana Secretary of State, Election Returns, October 24, 1987.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McGlothin resigned midway in his second term as sheriff as a result of a criminal conviction. The Concordia Parish Police Jury, the parish governing body, then appointed Randy Maxwell, effective August 31, 1990, to serve until a special election was held on March 21, 1991. In that all-Democrat contest, Maxwell defeated Schiele, 4,619 (62.9 percent) to 1,900 (25.9 percent). Two other candidates shared the remaining 11.3 percent of the vote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Louisiana Secretary of State, Election Returns, March 23, 1991.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Maxwell was unopposed in the nonpartisan blanket primary for sheriff on October 19, 1991, and has since remained in the position though he has had close elections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.concordiasentinel.com/news.php?id=807|title=Joey Martin|title=Randy Maxwell: 'Still a lot to do'|publisher=''The Concordia Sentine''|date=October 18, 2007; no longer on-line}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
The probation and paroles division relocated the Schiele's to [[Alexandria, Louisiana|Alexandria]], where he died of a massive heart attack at the age of sixty-eight. He was a [[United Methodist]]. After her husband’s death, Mrs. Schiele, a native of Natchez, [[Mississippi]], moved to  Loranger to be near her two daughters. Schiele, like Sheriff Cross his predecessor, is interred at the Natchez City Cemetery across the Mississippi River from Vidalia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Natchez City Cemetery records, Natchez, Mississippi.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schiele, Fred}}​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Louisiana People]]​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Farmers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democrats]]​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Methodists]]​&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Schiele&amp;diff=1589166</id>
		<title>Fred Schiele</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Schiele&amp;diff=1589166"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:26:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Simplifying page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name= Fred Lyle “Buddy” Schiele, Sr.​&lt;br /&gt;
|office=[[Louisiana]] State Representative&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for Concordia Parish ​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=1964 ​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=1968​&lt;br /&gt;
|preceded=S. P. &amp;quot;Jack&amp;quot; Crane​&lt;br /&gt;
|succeeded=David I. Patten​&lt;br /&gt;
|office2=[[Sheriff]] of Concordia Parish​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start2=April 6, 1973​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end2=July 1980​&lt;br /&gt;
|preceded2=Noah W. Cross​&lt;br /&gt;
|succeeded2=John Patrick​&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=November 28, 1933​&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Vidalia, Concordia Parish&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Louisiana]], [[United States|USA]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=[[Alexandria, Louisiana|Alexandria]], Rapides Parish, Louisiana​&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=January 24, 2002 (aged 68)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Resting place''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Natchez City Cemetery in Natchez, [[Mississippi]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|residence=Vidalia and Alexandria, Louisiana​&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democratic Party|Democrat]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[United Methodist]] ​&lt;br /&gt;
|occupation=[[Farmer]]; [[Sheriff]]|spouse= Maxine Smith Schiele (married 1954-2002, his death)​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Children''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Fred Schiele, Jr.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Carole Ann Schiele Rice&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Patricia Leigh Schiele&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Alan Maxwell Schiele&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Steven Lowery Schiele, II&lt;br /&gt;
|alma_mater=Vidalia High School&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Louisiana State University]]&lt;br /&gt;
|footnotes='''Notes''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Schiele had already been a one-term state representative, when his former legislative colleague, [[Governor]] [[Edwin Edwards]], tapped him to succeed Noah W. Cross as [[sheriff]] of Schiele’s native Concordia Parish in eastern [[Louisiana]].​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Schiele managed Edwards’ [[Governor|gubernatorial]] campaign in Concordia Parish in 1971-1972.​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* After his seven years as sheriff, Shiele completed his college degree later in life and was employed thereafter by the Louisiana Department of Corrections. ​&lt;br /&gt;
}}​&lt;br /&gt;
'''Fred Lyle Schiele, Sr.''', known also as '''Buddy Schiele''' (November 28, 1933 &amp;amp;ndash; January 24, 2002), served from 1964 to 1968 as a [[Democratic Party|Democratic]] state representative for Concordia Parish in eastern [[Louisiana]] adjacent to the [[Mississippi River]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://house.louisiana.gov/H_PDFdocs/HouseMembership_History_CURRENT.pdf|title=Membership in the Louisiana House of Representatives, 1880-2020|publisher=Louisiana House of Representatives|accessdate=October 30, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
​&lt;br /&gt;
Schiele (pronounced SHE LEE) did not seek reelection in the 1967 primary election but instead unsuccessfully opposed [[incumbent]] [[Sheriff]] Noah W. Cross of Ferriday, also in Concordia Parish. He won the sheriff's position in 1973 after Cross resigned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
Schiele was one of four sons born in Vidalia in Concordia Parish, to Catesby Edward Schiele and the former Lucille Rountree (1897-1977). In 1951, he graduated from Vidalia High School. Thirty years later, at the age of forty-eight, he procured his bachelor’s degree in business administration from [[Louisiana State University]] in [[Baton Rouge]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Statement of Fred Schiele, Jr., July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prior to his involvement in politics, Schiele ran a [[cotton]] gin in Ferriday. He also served on the board of First Federal Savings and Loan in Vidalia.&amp;lt;ref name=cs/&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1954, Schiele married the former Maxine Smith (1937-2009), a 1955 graduate of Vidalia High School. The couple had five children: Fred Schiele, Jr. (born 1955), a former deputy sheriff for his father and the appointed chief of police in Ferriday, who later entered the trucking business in [[Dallas]], [[Texas]]; Carole Ann Schiele Rice (born 1960) and Patricia Leigh Schiele (born 1962), both of Loranger in Tangipahoa Parish; Alan Maxwell Schiele (born 1964), a deputy sheriff in East Baton Rouge Parish, and Steven Lowery Schiele, II (born 1975) of Port Vincent, a [[village]] in Livingston Parish. Steven is named for Steven Schiele, I, a first cousin who was killed in an [[automobile]] accident in 1971. There were also three grandchildren and one great-grandchild.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;'Fred Schiele, ''The Alexandria Town Talk,'' January 5, 2002;  statement of Maxine Smith Schiele, July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political life ==&lt;br /&gt;
On April 6, 1973, more than five years after he first ran for sheriff of Concordia Parish, Schiele was appointed to the office by [[Governor]] [[Edwin Edwards]], pending a [[special election]], after incumbent Noah Cross was forced to resign after twenty-five years in office because of the failure of the [[appeal]] of his federal conviction of [[perjury]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Concordia Sentinel,'' April 11, 1973, p. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Edwards settled on Schiele because the former legislator had successfully managed Edwards' 1971-1972 [[Governor|gubernatorial]] campaign in Concordia Parish.&amp;lt;ref name=cs&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Schiele to Succeed Cross in Appointment,&amp;quot; ''The Concordia Sentinel,'' April 4, 1973, p. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sheriff Schiele won a full term in the 1975 election, but he was unseated in 1979 by fellow Democrat John Patrick, an [[insurance]] agent. He then completed his college degree and was employed thereafter by the Probation and Paroles section of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety. Schiele attempted a comeback in 1987, when he challenged incumbent Sheriff Hubert Lee McGlothin (1940-2004), who had previously been the  [[mayor]] of Ferriday. In the 1987 contest, Schiele polled 1,155 votes (12.8 percent).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Louisiana Secretary of State, Election Returns, October 24, 1987.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McGlothin resigned midway in his second term as sheriff as a result of a criminal conviction. The Concordia Parish Police Jury, the parish governing body, then appointed Randy Maxwell, effective August 31, 1990, to serve until a special election was held on March 21, 1991. In that all-Democrat contest, Maxwell defeated Schiele, 4,619 (62.9 percent) to 1,900 (25.9 percent). Two other candidates shared the remaining 11.3 percent of the vote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Louisiana Secretary of State, Election Returns, March 23, 1991.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Maxwell was unopposed in the nonpartisan blanket primary for sheriff on October 19, 1991, and has since remained in the position though he has had close elections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.concordiasentinel.com/news.php?id=807|title=Joey Martin|title=Randy Maxwell: 'Still a lot to do'|publisher=''The Concordia Sentine''|date=October 18, 2007; no longer on-line}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
The probation and paroles division relocated the Schieles to [[Alexandria, Louisiana|Alexandria]], where he died of a massive heart attack at the age of sixty-eight. He was a [[United Methodist]]. After her husband’s death, Mrs. Schiele, a native of Natchez, [[Mississippi]], moved to  Loranger to be near her two daughters. Schiele, like Sheriff Cross his predecessor, is interred at the Natchez City Cemetery across the Mississippi River from Vidalia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Natchez City Cemetery records, Natchez, Mississippi.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schiele, Fred}}​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Louisiana People]]​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Farmers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democrats]]​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Methodists]]​&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Schiele&amp;diff=1589165</id>
		<title>Fred Schiele</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fred_Schiele&amp;diff=1589165"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:25:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Infobox officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name= Fred Lyle “Buddy” Schiele, Sr.​&lt;br /&gt;
|office=[[Louisiana]] State Representative&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for Concordia Parish ​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=1964 ​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=1968​&lt;br /&gt;
|preceded=S. P. &amp;quot;Jack&amp;quot; Crane​&lt;br /&gt;
|succeeded=David I. Patten​&lt;br /&gt;
|office2=[[Sheriff]] of Concordia Parish​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start2=April 6, 1973​&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end2=July 1980​&lt;br /&gt;
|preceded2=Noah W. Cross​&lt;br /&gt;
|succeeded2=John Patrick​&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=November 28, 1933​&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Vidalia, Concordia Parish&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Louisiana]], [[United States|USA]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=[[Alexandria, Louisiana|Alexandria]], Rapides Parish, Louisiana​&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=January 24, 2002 (aged 68)&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Resting place''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Natchez City Cemetery in Natchez, [[Mississippi]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|residence=Vidalia and Alexandria, Louisiana​&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democratic Party|Democrat]]​&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[United Methodist]] ​&lt;br /&gt;
|occupation=[[Farmer]]; [[Sheriff]]|spouse= Maxine Smith Schiele (married 1954-2002, his death)​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''Children''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Fred Schiele, Jr.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Carole Ann Schiele Rice&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Patricia Leigh Schiele&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Alan Maxwell Schiele&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
Steven Lowery Schiele, II&lt;br /&gt;
|alma_mater=Vidalia High School&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Louisiana State University]]&lt;br /&gt;
|footnotes='''Notes''':&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Schiele had already been a one-term state representative, when his former legislative colleague, [[Governor]] [[Edwin Edwards]], tapped him to succeed Noah W. Cross as [[sheriff]] of Schiele’s native Concordia Parish in eastern [[Louisiana]].​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Schiele managed Edwards’ [[Governor|gubernatorial]] campaign in Concordia Parish in 1971-1972.​&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*After his seven years as sheriff, Shiele completed his college degree later in life and was employed thereafter by the Louisiana Department of Corrections. ​&lt;br /&gt;
}}​&lt;br /&gt;
'''Fred Lyle Schiele, Sr.''', known also as '''Buddy Schiele''' (November 28, 1933 &amp;amp;ndash; January 24, 2002), served from 1964 to 1968 as a [[Democratic Party|Democratic]] state representative for Concordia Parish in eastern [[Louisiana]] adjacent to the [[Mississippi River]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://house.louisiana.gov/H_PDFdocs/HouseMembership_History_CURRENT.pdf|title=Membership in the Louisiana House of Representatives, 1880-2020|publisher=Louisiana House of Representatives|accessdate=October 30, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
​&lt;br /&gt;
Schiele (pronounced SHE LEE) did not seek reelection in the 1967 primary election but instead unsuccessfully opposed [[incumbent]] [[Sheriff]] Noah W. Cross of Ferriday, also in Concordia Parish. He won the sheriff's position in 1973 after Cross resigned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
Schiele was one of four sons born in Vidalia in Concordia Parish, to Catesby Edward Schiele and the former Lucille Rountree (1897-1977). In 1951, he graduated from Vidalia High School. Thirty years later, at the age of forty-eight, he procured his bachelor’s degree in business administration from [[Louisiana State University]] in [[Baton Rouge]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Statement of Fred Schiele, Jr., July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prior to his involvement in politics, Schiele ran a [[cotton]] gin in Ferriday. He also served on the board of First Federal Savings and Loan in Vidalia.&amp;lt;ref name=cs/&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1954, Schiele married the former Maxine Smith (1937-2009), a 1955 graduate of Vidalia High School. The couple had five children: Fred Schiele, Jr. (born 1955), a former deputy sheriff for his father and the appointed chief of police in Ferriday, who later entered the trucking business in [[Dallas]], [[Texas]]; Carole Ann Schiele Rice (born 1960) and Patricia Leigh Schiele (born 1962), both of Loranger in Tangipahoa Parish; Alan Maxwell Schiele (born 1964), a deputy sheriff in East Baton Rouge Parish, and Steven Lowery Schiele, II (born 1975) of Port Vincent, a [[village]] in Livingston Parish. Steven is named for Steven Schiele, I, a first cousin who was killed in an [[automobile]] accident in 1971. There were also three grandchildren and one great-grandchild.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;'Fred Schiele, ''The Alexandria Town Talk,'' January 5, 2002;  statement of Maxine Smith Schiele, July 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political life==&lt;br /&gt;
​&lt;br /&gt;
On April 6, 1973, more than five years after he first ran for sheriff of Concordia Parish, Schiele was appointed to the office by [[Governor]] [[Edwin Edwards]], pending a [[special election]], after incumbent Noah Cross was forced to resign after twenty-five years in office because of the failure of the [[appeal]] of his federal conviction of [[perjury]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Concordia Sentinel,'' April 11, 1973, p. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Edwards settled on Schiele because the former legislator had successfully managed Edwards' 1971-1972 [[Governor|gubernatorial]] campaign in Concordia Parish.&amp;lt;ref name=cs&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Schiele to Succeed Cross in Appointment,&amp;quot; ''The Concordia Sentinel,'' April 4, 1973, p. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sheriff Schiele won a full term in the 1975 election, but he was unseated in 1979 by fellow Democrat John Patrick, an [[insurance]] agent. He then completed his college degree and was employed thereafter by the Probation and Paroles section of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety. Schiele attempted a comeback in 1987, when he challenged incumbent Sheriff Hubert Lee McGlothin (1940-2004), who had previously been the  [[mayor]] of Ferriday. In the 1987 contest, Schiele polled 1,155 votes (12.8 percent).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Louisiana Secretary of State, Election Returns, October 24, 1987.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McGlothin resigned midway in his second term as sheriff as a result of a criminal conviction. The Concordia Parish Police Jury, the parish governing body, then appointed Randy Maxwell, effective August 31, 1990, to serve until a special election was held on March 21, 1991. In that all-Democrat contest, Maxwell defeated Schiele, 4,619 (62.9 percent) to 1,900 (25.9 percent). Two other candidates shared the remaining 11.3 percent of the vote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Louisiana Secretary of State, Election Returns, March 23, 1991.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Maxwell was unopposed in the nonpartisan blanket primary for sheriff on October 19, 1991, and has since remained in the position though he has had close elections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.concordiasentinel.com/news.php?id=807|title=Joey Martin|title=Randy Maxwell: 'Still a lot to do'|publisher=''The Concordia Sentine''|date=October 18, 2007; no longer on-line}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Death ==&lt;br /&gt;
The probation and paroles division relocated the Schieles to [[Alexandria, Louisiana|Alexandria]], where he died of a massive heart attack at the age of sixty-eight. He was a [[United Methodist]]. After her husband’s death, Mrs. Schiele, a native of Natchez, [[Mississippi]], moved to  Loranger to be near her two daughters. Schiele, like Sheriff Cross his predecessor, is interred at the Natchez City Cemetery across the Mississippi River from Vidalia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Natchez City Cemetery records, Natchez, Mississippi.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;​&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schiele, Fred}}​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Louisiana People]]​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Farmers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democrats]]​&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Methodists]]​&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Orb&amp;diff=1589155</id>
		<title>User:Orb</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Orb&amp;diff=1589155"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:18:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello, on [[Conservapedia]], Orb is my username! The only kind of stuff that I do around here is adding either missing birth or death dates on famous people, fixing any grammatical errors, and/or simplifying the headers and the text to make the pages more simple to read. Any questions, comments, suggestions, concerns, enquiries, etc., can be directed to my [[Special:EmailUser/Orb|email]] or via my [[User talk:Orb|talk page]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Orb&amp;diff=1589154</id>
		<title>User:Orb</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Orb&amp;diff=1589154"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:17:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello, on [[Conservapedia]], Orb is my username! The only kind of stuff that I do around here is adding either missing birth or death dates on famous people, fixing any grammatical errors, and/or simplifying the headers and the text to make the page more simple to read. Any questions, comments, suggestions, concerns, enquiries, etc., can be directed to my [[Special:EmailUser/Orb|email]] or via my [[User talk:Orb|talk page]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Orb&amp;diff=1589153</id>
		<title>User:Orb</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Orb&amp;diff=1589153"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:17:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Created page with &amp;quot;Hello, on Conservapedia, Orb is my username! The only kind of stuff that I do around here is adding either missing birth or death dates on famous people, fixing any gramma...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello, on [[Conservapedia]], Orb is my username! The only kind of stuff that I do around here is adding either missing birth or death dates on famous people, fixing any grammatical errors, and/or simplifying the headers and the text to make the page more simple to read. Any questions, comments, suggestions, concerns, enquiries, etc., can be directed to my [[Special:EmailUser/Orb|email] or via my [[User talk:Orb|talk page]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Testament&amp;diff=1589150</id>
		<title>New Testament</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Testament&amp;diff=1589150"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:11:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Fixing grammatical errors. Simplifying page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Bible}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''New Testament''' is a collection of biblical books written by various authors between 45 AD and 100 AD, revolving around the life and work of [[Jesus]] of Nazareth and His apostles, as well as the history of the early church.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The books are traditionally classified into categories:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The four [[Gospel]]s (literally &amp;quot;Good news&amp;quot;): [[Alleged Bible contradictions|varying]] accounts of the life and ministry of [[Jesus]], consisting of the gospels attributed to [[Saint Matthew|Matthew]], [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]], [[Luke]], and [[John the Apostle|John]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Acts of the Apostles]] (or just &amp;quot;Acts&amp;quot;) (which J. B. Phillips evocatively called &amp;quot;The Young Church In Action,&amp;quot;) which concerns the ministry of the Apostles after the death of Christ. It is similar in language and style to and reads as a continuation of, the Gospel of [[Luke]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Epistles (biblical books)|The Epistles]] (which J. B. Phillips called &amp;quot;Letters to Young Churches,&amp;quot;) ''Romans'' through ''Jude'', consisting of fourteen letters attributed to St. Paul and seven by other writers including James, [[Saint Peter|Peter]], John, and Jude.  The writer of the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is not known with certainty, but was probably [[Jesus]] himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Book of Revelation]] (or just &amp;quot;Revelation,&amp;quot;) the prophetic book which ends the New Testament. It is also known as &amp;quot;the Apocalypse&amp;quot; (Greek for 'revelation'). It is somewhat similar in style to the [[Old Testament]] book of [[Daniel]] (and indeed weaves common prophecy), and tells of the end of the world, including [[Armageddon]], Judgment Day, and the arrival of the Kingdom of Heaven. Despite Jesus' thrice-repeated promise in it that 'I shall come very soon', opinions vary as to whether it refers to imminent events set amid the then Roman Empire or to the far future.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with the Old Testament, the chapter and verse divisions of the various books are not original but were added in medieval times for greater understanding.  But the term &amp;quot;New Testament&amp;quot; was first coined (in Latin) around A.D. 200, by the theologian Tertullian, who was the first biblical scholar to write in Latin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oldest books in the New Testament are the letters of [[Paul]], or possibly the book of [[St. James the Less|James]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Books of the New Testament Canon ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rylands papyrus verso.jpg|thumb|Rylands papyrus, verso, (P52); containing on the one side part of St. John's Gospel verses 31-33, on the other of verses 37-38 of chapter xviii.]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gospel of Matthew|Matthew]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gospel of Mark|Mark]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gospel of Luke|Luke]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gospel of John|John]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Acts of the Apostles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Epistle to the Romans|Romans]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[First Epistle to the Corinthians|I Corinthians]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[II Corinthians]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Galatians]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ephesians]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philippians]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Colossians]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[First Epistle to the Thessalonians|I Thessalonians]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[II Thessalonians]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[I Timothy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[II Timothy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Epistle to Titus|Titus]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Epistle to Philemon|Philemon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Epistle to the Hebrews|Hebrews]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Epistle of James|James]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[I Peter]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Second Epistle of Peter|II Peter]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[I John]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[II John]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[III John]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Epistle of Jude|Jude]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Book of Revelation|Revelation]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Language ==&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the books of the New Testament, except for the Gospel of Luke, the Epistle to the Hebrews and several of Paul's letters, were written in [[Koine Greek]], a form of Greek used as a lingua franca around the eastern part of the Roman Empire at the time, rather than the [[Aramaic]] that would have actually been spoken in the events described.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is Jesus’ Name Greek or Hebrew? Jesus Christ told us that by His name we shall be saved, and by the authority of His name we can cast out demons, heal the sick, and so on. In most Bibles, including the King James Version, His name is Jesus Christ with a J. However, there is a relatively recent movement among some who insist that since the letter J never existed back in the New Testament era, His name should be spoken and written in Hebrew. But is that true? With salvation being at stake, it would be vitally important to get His name right. Despite what many of these neo-Hebrew messianic Christians might think, the movement actually did not gain ground until the early 1900s, when every other modern doctrine of demons and anti-Christ institutions took shapes, such as the Federal Reserve, the IRS, and others. It does not take a lot of intelligence to realize that the New Testament was rendered in a form of ancient Greek called Koine Greek. This means it was not rendered in Hebrew. Why? Because our Heavenly Father knew that the same Pharisees and Sadducees who conspired to kill Jesus Christ would trap the new Christian Church with their confusing Hebrew language gymnastics. Recall that Jesus scolded the false leaders because they twisted the concept of tithing in order to get out of helping their parents, and also twisted the law by focusing on the gold of the altar instead of the meaning of the sacrifice on the altar. Likewise, they would trick new Christians regarding the name of Jesus Christ, deceiving them into waiting for a false Messiah with a Hebrew name of their choosing, instead of the universal name God already determined for Jesus Christ. God chose ancient Greek to deliver Jesus’ name. The fact that the letter J did not exist back then is nonsense. Are you saying that now in order to be saved, every Christian has to speak Hebrew since the letter J did not exist? The entire English language was not around! No modern language existed back then, so stop it with that silliness. This is yet another trap by Satan to condition you to worship his anti-Christ, who will have a Hebrew name, most likely the name Yeshua or one of its variations. Don’t be fooled. Once again, the New Testament was written in ancient Greek precisely because God wanted to open up salvation to Jew and Gentile alike, and keep the yeast of the Pharisees from leading everyone to Hell with them! Think long and hard on that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Twelve Apostles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Virgin Mary]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Famous Bible paintings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Aramaic Judaism, Jewish Aramaic Christianity, and John 1:1]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Covenant]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Alexandria-text type]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Cruden, A., ''Complete Concordance to the Old and New Testaments'' (Lutterworth, 1930)&lt;br /&gt;
* Cross, C., ''Who Was Jesus?'' (Hodder &amp;amp; Stoughton, 1970)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Holy Bible'' (King James Version)&lt;br /&gt;
* James, M. R., ''The Apocryphal New Testament'' (Clarendon, Oxford, 1953)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The New English Bible'' (Oxford &amp;amp; Cambridge University Presses, 1970)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The New Jerusalem Bible'' (Darton, Longman &amp;amp; Todd, 1990)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lemesurier, P., ''The Armageddon Script'' (Element Books, 1981)&lt;br /&gt;
* Peake, A. S., ''Commentary on the Bible'' (Nelson, 1962)&lt;br /&gt;
* Schonfield, H. J., ''The Authentic New Testament'' (Dobson, n.d.)&lt;br /&gt;
* Schonfield, H. J., ''The Passover Plot'' (Hutchinson, 1965)&lt;br /&gt;
* Schonfield, H. J., ''The Pentecost Revolution'' (Macdonald, 1974)&lt;br /&gt;
* Schonfield, H. J., ''Those Incredible Christians'' (Bernard Geis, New York, 1968)&lt;br /&gt;
* Vermes, G., ''Jesus the Jew'' (Collins, 1973)&lt;br /&gt;
* Young, R., ''Analytical Concordance to the Holy Bible'' (Lutterworth, 1939)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.swartzentrover.com/cotor/E-Books/papers/acceptnt.htm Acceptance of the New Testament Canon]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.swartzentrover.com/cotor/E-Books/christ/Interliner/Greekindex.htm The Interlinear Translation of the Greek New Testament]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.swartzentrover.com/cotor/E-Books/christ/bruce/ntdocindex.htm THE NEW TESTAMENT DOCUMENTS Are they Reliable?]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.swartzentrover.com/cotor/Bible/Bible/NT/Chorology%20of%20Important%20New%20Testament%20Manuscripts.htm Chorology of Important New Testament Manuscripts]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bertschlossberg.blogspot.com/2012/11/jesus-through-fabric-of-our-lives.html Jesus through the Fabric of our Lives]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{New Testament Books}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Testament| ]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Mondern&amp;diff=1589149</id>
		<title>User talk:Mondern</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Mondern&amp;diff=1589149"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:08:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Created page with &amp;quot;{{Welcome}} --~~~~&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Welcome}} --[[User:Orb|Orb]] ([[User talk:Orb|talk]]) 13:08, 30 October 2019 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Steven_Levitt&amp;diff=1589148</id>
		<title>Steven Levitt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Steven_Levitt&amp;diff=1589148"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:07:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Steven Levitt''' (born May 29, 1967) is an [[American]] [[liberal]] economist and co-author of ''[[Freakonomics]]'', a book falsely claiming legalized [[abortion]] contributed to a drop in the crime rate in the 1990s (a phenomenon accurately attributed to [[conservative]] social policies). Levitt's theory has been compared to [[Eugenics]].{{who says}}  He supports the privatization of prison labor and online gambling, opposes teachers' unions, and denies climate change.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://shameproject.com/profile/steven-d-levitt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was born May 29, 1967, attended St. Paul University and graduated from Harvard University with a B.A. in economics in 1989, and received a Ph.D. from the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/steven-levitt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Levitt, Steven}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Jews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Jewish Authors]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Steven_Levitt&amp;diff=1589147</id>
		<title>Steven Levitt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Steven_Levitt&amp;diff=1589147"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:06:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Stub template does not exist&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Steven Levitt''' (born May 29, 1967) is an [[American] [[liberal]] economist and co-author of ''[[Freakonomics]]'', a book falsely claiming legalized [[abortion]] contributed to a drop in the crime rate in the 1990s (a phenomenon accurately attributed to [[conservative]] social policies). Levitt's theory has been compared to [[Eugenics]].{{who says}}  He supports the privatization of prison labor and online gambling, opposes teachers' unions, and denies climate change.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://shameproject.com/profile/steven-d-levitt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was born May 29, 1967, attended St. Paul University and graduated from Harvard University with a B.A. in economics in 1989, and received a Ph.D. from the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/steven-levitt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Levitt, Steven}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Jews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Jewish Authors]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Steven_Levitt&amp;diff=1589146</id>
		<title>Steven Levitt</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Steven_Levitt&amp;diff=1589146"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T17:06:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Simplifying page. Fixing grammatical errors. Added category:people, Added birth date:May 29, 1967. Added stub template&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Steven Levitt''' (born May 29, 1967) is an [[American] [[liberal]] economist and co-author of ''[[Freakonomics]]'', a book falsely claiming legalized [[abortion]] contributed to a drop in the crime rate in the 1990s (a phenomenon accurately attributed to [[conservative]] social policies). Levitt's theory has been compared to [[Eugenics]].{{who says}}  He supports the privatization of prison labor and online gambling, opposes teachers' unions, and denies climate change.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://shameproject.com/profile/steven-d-levitt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was born May 29, 1967, attended St. Paul University and graduated from Harvard University with a B.A. in economics in 1989, and received a Ph.D. from the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/steven-levitt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Levitt, Steven}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Jews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Jewish Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Stub}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_presidential_election,_1792&amp;diff=1589144</id>
		<title>United States presidential election, 1792</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_States_presidential_election,_1792&amp;diff=1589144"/>
		<updated>2019-10-30T16:59:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Orb: Simplifying page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;President [[George Washington]] was still popular when his four years in office were over. He was reluctant to run for a second term, and even composed the first draft of his [[Farewell Address]], but Jefferson and Hamilton (already beginning to be political enemies) united one last time to convince him to run for re-election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''America Afire: Jefferson, Adams, and the Revolutionary Election of 1800''. Bernard A. Weisberger.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He consented to serve a second term, but would never consider a third term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Encyclopedia of Presidents, George Washington]], by Zachary Kent, Children's Press, 1986.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This election was held before the [[Twelfth Amendment]], so each elector had two votes; the runner-up would become Vice-President. Thus, with one vote from each elector, George Washington was unanimously re-elected. The results were:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! candidates&lt;br /&gt;
! electoral vote&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[George Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 132&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[John Adams]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 77&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[George Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 50&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Thomas Jefferson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [[Aaron Burr]]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[A Pictoral History of the U.S. Presidents]], by Clare Gibson, Gramercy Books, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:1792, United States presidential election.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Presidential Elections]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Orb</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>