Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

Curt Schilling

2007-07-07T01:21:31Z

Onegod:

'''Curt Schilling''' (born November 14, 1966 in [[Anchorage]], [[Alaska]]) is an [[American]] [[baseball]] player currently playing for the [[Boston Red Sox]]. A starting pitcher for most of his major league career, he has played on two [[World Series]] winning teams, the 2001 [[Arizona Diamondbacks]] and the 2004 Boston Red Sox. He is known throughout baseball for his quick wit, friendly nature, and conservative ideology. Among many fans he is known to have a "big mouth", speaking about topics about which he has no understanding such as the [[2004 presidential election]] and [[Barry Bonds]]' home life.

==External Links==

* [http://38pitches.com/ Curt Schilling's official blog: 38 Pitches]

* [http://www.38studios.com/ 38 Studios Homepage]

[[Category:Athletes]]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schilling, Curt}}

The nation

2007-07-07T01:13:39Z

Onegod: New page: '''''The Nation''''' ({{ISSN|0027-8378}}) is a weekly <ref> The magazine is published weekly, except for the second week in January, and biweekly the third week of July through the second ...

'''''The Nation''''' ({{ISSN|0027-8378}}) is a weekly
<ref>
The magazine is published weekly, except for the second week in January, and biweekly the third week of July through the second week of September.
</ref>
[[United States|U.S.]] [[periodical]] devoted to [[politics]] and [[culture]], self-described as "the flagship of the [[left-wing politics|left]]".
<ref>
[http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000CNEFRE/ Publisher's description] on [[Amazon.com]] page about ''The Nation''. Accessed 27 June 2006.
</ref>
Founded on [[July 6]], [[1865]] as an [[Abolitionist]] publication, it is the oldest continuously published weekly magazine in the [[United States]]. It is published by the Nation Company, L.P. at 33 Irving Place, [[New York City]].

''The Nation'' has bureaus in [[Budapest]], [[London]], and Southern [[Africa]] and departments covering [[Architecture]], [[Art]], [[Corporation]]s, [[Defense (military)|Defense]], [[Natural environment|Environment]], [[Film]]s, [[Law|Legal Affairs]], [[Music]], [[Peace]] and [[Disarmament]], [[Poetry]], and the [[United Nations]]. The [[Newspaper circulation|circulation]] of ''The Nation'' is rising and was last placed at 184,296 (2004), surpassing the neoliberal ''[[The New Republic]]'', the neoconservative ''[[The Weekly Standard]]'', and the conservative ''[[National Review]]''. ''The Nation'' magazine has lost money in all but three or four years of operation and is sustained in part by a group of more than 25,000 donors called [[The Nation Associates]] who donate funds to the periodical above and beyond their annual subscription fees.

The publisher and editor of ''The Nation'' is [[Katrina vanden Heuvel]]. Former editors include [[Victor Navasky]], [[Norman Thomas]] (associate editor), [[Carey McWilliams (journalist)|Carey McWilliams]], and [[Freda Kirchwey]]. Notable contributors to ''The Nation'' have included [[Albert Einstein]], [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], [[Gore Vidal]], [[Hunter S. Thompson]], [[Langston Hughes]], [[Ralph Nader]], [[James Baldwin (writer)|James Baldwin]], [[Clement Greenberg]], [[Tom Hayden]], [[Daniel Singer]], [[I.F. Stone]], [[Leon Trotsky]], [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]], [[James K. Galbraith]], [[John Steinbeck]], and [[Jean-Paul Sartre]].

==Regular columns==
* "Beat the Devil" by [[Alexander Cockburn]]
* "The Liberal Media" by [[Eric Alterman]]
* "Diary of a Mad Law Professor" by [[Patricia J. Williams]]
* "Subject to Debate" by [[Katha Pollitt]]
* "Beneath the Radar" by [[Gary Younge]]
* "Look Out" by [[Naomi Klein]]
* "Deadline Poet" by [[Calvin Trillin]]
* The Nation [[cryptic crossword]] by Frank W. Lewis

[[Christopher Hitchens]] wrote the column "Minority Report" for twenty years; he resigned in 2003 over the magazine's ongoing anti-war position in relation to the [[Iraq war]] and [[War on Terror]].

==Notable recent events==
''The Nation'' Washington Editor, [[David Corn]] broke the [[Valerie Plame]] leak scandal in the summer of 2003 in the pages of ''The Nation'' after noting that journalist [[Robert Novak]]'s blowing of the CIA operative's cover in a newspaper column could be a possible [[felony]].

Former columnist [[Christopher Hitchens]] left in a widely publicized and vocal break with the magazine when it published a large number of letters from readers, who, Hitchens claimed, blamed [[United States|America]] for the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]].

In March 2005, the publication's [[United Nations]] correspondent, Ian Williams, was the subject of adverse publicity for accepting money from the UN while covering it for ''The Nation''. [[Fox News Channel]], [[Accuracy in Media]] and [[FrontPage Magazine]] criticized Williams and the publication. He and The Nation denied wrongdoing. <ref>Alyssa A. Lappen, [http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=17373 Another U.N. Scandal], FrontPageMagazine.com March 16, 2005. Accessed 27 June 2006. Cliff Kincaid, [http://www.aim.org/special_report/2656_0_8_0_C/ Journalists Exposed on the U.N. Payroll; George Soros, Ted Turner Pay for Journalism Prizes], Accuracy in Media, February 15, 2005. Accessed 27 June 2006. [http://www.aim.org/press_release/2682_0_19_0_C/ U.N. Reporters Group May Have Violated U.S. Immigration Law], Accuracy in Media press release, February 22, 2005. Accessed 27 June 2006.</ref>

In its [[November 28]], [[2005]] issue, ''The Nation'' issued an endorsement policy for political candidates that stated that they would only endorse candidates who oppose the war in Iraq.

==History==
[[Abolitionists]] founded ''The Nation'' in July 1865 on "[[Newspaper Row]]" at 130 Nassau Street in [[Manhattan]]. At the time, Joseph H. Richards was the publisher and [[E.L. Godkin]], a [[classical liberal]] critic of [[nationalism]], [[imperialism]], and [[socialism]] <ref>Edwin L. Godkin, [http://praxeology.net/ELG-EL.htm The Eclipse of Liberalism], ''The Nation'', August 9, 1900. Reproduced on the site of the Molinari Institute, accessed 27 June 2006.</ref>, was the editor. The magazine would stay at Newspaper Row for the next ninety years. [[Wendell Phillips Garrison]], son of [[William Lloyd Garrison]], was literary editor of the periodical from 1865 to 1906.

In 1881, newspaperman-turned-railroad-baron [[Henry Villard]] acquired ''The Nation'' and converted it into a weekly literary supplement for his daily newspaper the ''New York Evening Post''. The offices of the magazine were moved to the ''Evening Post'''s headquarters at 210 Broadway. The ''New York Evening Post'' would later morph into a tabloid: the ''[[New York Post]]'' was a left-leaning afternoon tabloid under owner [[Dorothy Schiff]] from 1939 to 1976, and has been a [[Conservatism|conservative]] tabloid owned by [[Rupert Murdoch]] since that time, while ''The Nation'' became known for its left-liberal politics.

In 1918, Henry's Villard's son, [[Oswald Garrison Villard]], took over as editor of the magazine and sold the ''Evening Post''. He remade ''The Nation'' into a current affairs publication and gave it a [[liberal]] orientation. Villard's takeover of ''The Nation'' prompted a roughly 50 year monitoring of the magazine by the FBI. The FBI had a file on Villard since 1915. Almost every editor of ''The Nation'' from Villard's time to the 1970s was looked at for "subversive" activities and ties.<ref>Kimball, Penn. "The History of ''The Nation'' According to the FBI." ''The Nation''. 22 March 1986. Pg. 399-426.</ref> When [[Albert Jay Nock]], not long later, published a column criticizing [[Samuel Gompers]] and trade unions for being complicit in the [[war machine]] of the [[First World War]], ''The Nation'' was briefly suspended from the U.S. mail.<ref>{{cite journal| author = Wreszin, Michael | year = 1969 | title = Albert Jay Nock and the Anarchist Elitist Tradition in America | journal = [[American Quarterly]] | volume = 21 | issue = 2 | pages = 165-189}} p. 173. Wreszin remarks, "It was probably the only time any publication was suppressed in America for attacking a labor leader, but the suspension seemed to document Nock's charges."</ref>

During the late 1940s and again in the early 1950s, a merger was discussed among Kirchwey - on ''The Nation'''s side (later McWilliams when he took over) - and [[Michael Straight]] of ''[[The New Republic]]''. The two magazines were very similar at that time - both were left of center (''The Nation'' further left than ''TNR''); both had circulations around 100,000 (''TNR'' had a slightly higher circulation); and both lost money - and it was thought that the two magazines could unite and make the most powerful journal of opinion. The new publication would have been called ''The Nation and New Republic''. Kirchwey was the most hesitant, and both attempts to merge failed. The two magazines would later take very different paths, with ''The Nation'' having a higher circulation and ''The New Republic'' moving more to the right.<ref>Navasky, Victor S. "The Merger that Wasn't." ''The Nation''. 1 January 1990.</ref>

New ''Nation'' publisher [[Hamilton Fish V|Hamilton Fish]] and then-editor [[Victor Navasky]] moved the weekly to 72 [[Fifth Avenue (Manhattan)|Fifth Avenue]] in June 1979. In June 1998, the [[periodical]] had to move to make way for [[condominium]] development. The offices of ''The Nation'' are now at 33 Irving Place.

==Important Articles==
*[[American Civil War|Civil War]] veteran and novelist [[John William De Forest]] contributed an article entitled "The Great American Novel" (9 January 1868), calling for a uniquely American realist approach to literature. The idealization of capturing the national [[zeitgeist]] has since become a staple of [[American Literature]], with many authors stating that their ultimate goal is to write the [[Great American Novel]].
*''The Nation'' uncovered evidence of "torture and massacres" during the [[United States occupation of Haiti|occupation]] of [[Haiti]]. The article led to a Congressional investigation and the independence of Haiti. (Seligmann, Herbert J. "The Conquest of Haiti." ''The Nation''. 10 July 1920.)
*The October 18, 1958, issue was dedicated entirely to [[Fred J. Cook|Fred J. Cook's]] exposé of the [[Federal Bureau of Investigations|FBI]]. (Cook, Fred J. "The FBI." ''The Nation''. 18 October 1958. Pg. 222-280.)
*The June 24, 1961, issue was also dedicated to an article by Cook about the [[Central Intelligence Agency|CIA]]. (Cook, Fred J. "The CIA." ''The Nation''. 24 June 1961. Pg. 529-572.
*''The Nation'' was the first US publication to report on what would later become the [[Bay of Pigs invasion]]. (Editors. "Are We Training Cuban Guerrillas?" ''The Nation''. 19 November 1960. Pg. 378-379.)
*A special report by Jamie Lincoln Kitman in the March 20, 2000, issue reported on efforts by [[Standard Oil]] (now [[ExxonMobil|Exxon]]), [[General Motors|GM]] and [[DuPont]] to cover up the dangers of lead additives (used for anti-knock purposes) in gas. (Lincoln Kitman, Jamie. "[http://www.thenation.com/doc/20000320/kitman The Secret History of Lead]." ''The Nation''. 20 March 2000. Pg. 11-44.)
*A series of articles by Bill Mesler revealed that a projectile made of [[depleted uranium]] used in the first [[Gulf War|Iraq war]] was more radioactive, deadlier and affected more soldiers than [[the Pentagon]] admitted. (Mesler, Bill. "The Pentagon's Radioactive Bullet." ''The Nation''. 21 October 1996. Pg. 11-14.; "Pentagon Poison: The Great Radioactive Ammo Cover-Up." ''The Nation''. 26 May 1997. Pg. 17-22.; "The Gulf War's New Casualties." ''The Nation''. 14 July 1997. Pg. 19-20.)
*''The Nation'' has revealed relationships between [[Nazi Germany]] and several corporations - including [[Bertelsmann]], [[Ford Motor Company]], and [[Eastman Kodak|Kodak]]. (Silverstein, Ken. "[http://www.thenation.com/doc/20000124/silverstein Ford and the Führer]." ''The Nation''. 24 January 2000. Pg. 11-16.; Fischler, Hersch. Friedman, John. "Bertelsmann's Nazi Past." ''The Nation''. 28 December 1998. Pg. 6-7.; Friedman, John S. "[http://www.thenation.com/doc/20010326/friedman Kodak's Nazi Connection]." ''The Nation''. 26 March 2001. Pg. 7, 23.)
*''The Nation'' printed several articles about the [[Whitewater (controversy)|Whitewater]] investigation against [[Bill Clinton]] including an article revealing a conflict of interest involving [[Kenneth Starr]] and the Resolution Trust Corporation. (Conason, Joe. Waas, Murray. "Troubled Whitewater." ''The Nation''. 18 March 1996. Pg. 13-18. Graves, Florence. "Starr and Willey: The Untold Story." ''The Nation''. 17 May 1999. Pg. 11-23. Dreyfuss, Roberts. "Collateral Damage: The Personal Costs of Starr's Investigation." ''The Nation''. 27 July/3 August 1998. Pg. 11-18.)
*Columnist Naomi Klein wrote an article that revealed a conflict of interest concerning [[James Baker|James A. Baker III]], who was appointed envoy to Iraq and was in charge of handling their national debt. (Klein, Naomi. "[http://www.thenation.com/doc/20041101/klein The Double Life of James Baker]." ''The Nation''. 1 November 2004. Pg. 13-20.)
*Freelance reporter Joseph Kors conducted a six month investigation into the discharging of soldiers from the military by misdiagnosing them with "personality disorder." Because personality disorder is a pre-existing condition, these soldiers are given no benefits or future health coverage through the military, and, in some cases, forced to give back their enlistment bonus. (Kors, Joseph. "[http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070409/kors How Specialst Town Lost His Benefits]." ''The Nation''. 9 April 2006. Pg. 11-18.)

==Mission==
According to ''The Nation'''s founding prospectus of 1865, "''The Nation'' will not be the organ of any party, sect, or body. It will, on the contrary, make an earnest effort to bring to the discussion of political and social questions a really critical spirit, and to wage war upon the vices of violence, exaggeration, and misrepresentation by which so much of the political writing of the day is marred."

==Editorial Board==
[[Deepak Bhargava]], [[Norman Birnbaum]], [[Barbara Ehrenreich]], [[Richard Falk]], [[Frances FitzGerald]], [[Eric Foner]], [[Philip Green (author)|Philip Green]], [[Lani Guinier]], [[Tom Hayden]], [[Randall Kennedy]], [[Tony Kushner]], [[Elinor Langer]], [[Deborah Meier]], [[Toni Morrison]], [[Victor Navasky]], [[Pedro Antonio Noguera]], [[Richard Parker]], [[Michael Pertschuk]], [[Elizabeth Pochoda]], [[Marcus G. Raskin]], [[Andrea Batista Schlesinger]], [[David Weir (journalist)|David Weir]], and [[Roger Wilkins]].

==Notes==
<references />

==External links==
*[http://www.thenation.com ''The Nation'' website]
*[http://www.thenation.com/archive/ ''The Nation'' digital archive]
*[http://www.thenation.com/about/ ''The Nation'' masthead]

[[Category:American political magazines|Nation]]
[[Category:The Nation (U.S. periodical) people]]
[[Category:Publications established in 1865|Nation]]

[[de:The Nation (USA)]]
[[fr:The Nation]]
[[sv:The Nation]]
[[fi:The Nation]]

User talk:DanH

2007-07-07T01:04:12Z

Onegod:

'''Archives:'''

[[User talk:MountainDew]]

[[User talk:DanHarchive1]]

==Vandalism==

Dan,

Thanks for all your help dealing with this latest vandal. Rather than deleting all the pages he creates, I have been replacing them with content or redirecting them, and then protecting them. Eventually, we can hope he will run out of inventive names for Satan! ~ [[User:SharonS|Sharon]] [[User talk:SharonS|Talk]] 16:38, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

== [[deletedpage]] ==

when pages need to be deleted and protected, just protect it and replace the content with <nowiki>#REDIRECT [[deletedpage]]</nowiki>. that way it doesn't show up on searches. --[[User:CPAdmin1|Tim (CPAdmin1)]][[User talk:CPAdmin1|talk]] 12:24, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

== Please take a look at this edit ==

You might want to have a look at this [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Che_Guevara&diff=160970&oldid=160909 edit], and the associated photo that was uploaded to make the edit possible. I've already left a message with the user responsible for the photo and edit, but am not sure if it is revertable. [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 18:41, 14 May 2007 (EDT)

==Allegation of Racism==

I fail to see how my comments on Sikhs are racist. Islam and Sikhism do not describe races they describe religion. Both are wrong in my opinion are to be condemed

== Thank you indeed ==

It has been an honor. Thank you indeed.

--[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 19:42, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

== Deceit Entry ==

Dan, please accept my apologies on the Ward Churchill edit to the [[deceit]] entry. I was confused about who he is. Feel free to reinsert something, with support like this: [http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_3841949,00.html]
--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:08, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
No need to apologize. I just figured that this instance was not quite conducive to the direct you had intended for this article. I'll re-add it a little later this evening. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:29, 16 May 2007 (EDT)

== Hovind ==

May I ask why you removed "controversial". Given that many other YECs also have issues with him, calling him controversial seems fair. [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 12:59, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

I've come under attack for my edits on this article (there was even a call for me to be blocked from the site, though it's not on any CP talk pages) and I was trying to "balance" the article somehow. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:02, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

== notice ==

please read this: [[New Sysops Training Page]]

[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:22, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

== Hello! ==

First of all, thanks for the greeting. This project is very interessting. I'm trying to build up a counter-Wikipedia in german language. The situation of the german Wikipedia is really dire. If you are dissapoited by the english language Wikipeda, take a closer look at the german one. There are not liberals (left) dominating, there are partly well known left-wing extremists (communists, socialists) serving as administrators. It's bad. --[[User:Deutscher|Deutscher]] 16:43, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

== Trashbat ==
Dan - I've no idea if Trashbat is blocked or otherwise in disgrace but the crude sexual reference you removed from [[Leeds]] was not posted by him but by Tony Drago. FYI. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 14:44, 20 May 2007 (EDT)
: I stand corrected. Well spotted. Tony Drago must have been a sock. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 14:49, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

*I don't see Dan online, however I did see: ''10:13, 20 May 2007 DanH blocked "Trashbat" with an expiry time of infinite ("dogging" reference to Leeds)'' So the two users being blocked are different instances. The other user's block isn't infinte. ;-) --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 14:51, 20 May 2007 (EDT)

:TK The "dogging" reference was put in twice but I only noticed the second edit which was done by Tony Drago. I thought that Trashbat was being unfairly blocked instead of Tony Drago but Dan pointed out that Trashbat had made the orginal edit a lot earlier, so it was fair after all. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:20, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

== Siege mentality ==

Thanks for moving that. I was trying to do it myself with a name change and redirect but being a sysop has its advantages I guess. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:15, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

== [[Contaception]] ==

Dan, can you move this to its proper title with an '''R''' in it. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:26, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

== [[Orthohombic]] ==

OK here's another one with a missing '''R''' - it should be orthorhombic. [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 03:38, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

== think i made a mistake ==

Got your message. I unblocked him I think before i got your message. Please make sure I did the unblocking right as i am not too techie here. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:58, 22 May 2007 (EDT)

== Question ==
I notice that some sysops protect images. Do you want me to do that to?[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] [[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]] 15:16, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

==Article Creations==
Your welcome Dan. I enjoy contributing to this site. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] [[Conservapedia:Requests for adminship#Support|Support my RfA]]) 22:44, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

== ! ==
I wanted to undo the Joshua article! Your to fast.[[User:Bohdan|Богдан]] [[User talk:Bohdan|Talk]] 23:44, 25 May 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for your kind welcome. I am glad to be here. I hope I can make a positive contribution. --[[User:ErnstR|ErnstR]] 00:06, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks ==

Thanks for protecting Joshua. Recently I have become more aware of the responsibility that we have to avoid efforts at sensationalism or inappropriate edits. I found one of our articles in an internet search engine, the first one I have seen. It was listed under atheism. There, proudly, is the link to conservapedia. What is the first line of text in the search engine for all to see what conservapedia says? George Bush states that he doesn't believe atheists should be U.S. citizens... This is what is presented as conservapedia? When we allow through junk, we sully the reputation of the site... Thanks again... [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:25, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks! (sorry not to have anything different from the above 2) ==

It's good to be back! Oh, and check out my shiny new hellenised sig!--[[User:Wikinterpreter|'''ύικι ντερπρετηρ''']] [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter talk?]

== Tiny typo==

Hi, hope you don't mind but I am really really picky about punctuation. I'm not proud of the fact, I just can't help it! In the Bible article, in the King James section, second paragraph, second sentence, it says "it's vocabulary", which should be "its vocabulary". "It's" is only ever a contraction of "It is". I wouldn't say anything but I just know there are people like me out there who will see that mistake, roll their eyes, and jump to conclusions (unfairly) about the quality of the article. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 19:09, 26 May 2007 (EDT)

* And then I went and wrote "tint typo" as the description. That's justice. [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 19:10, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
==Chrono Trigger==
This was a well known video game in the mid 90s. It is definetly noteworthy. Wikipedia and Uncyclopedia both have articles on it.

== Answers in Creation ==

So do I get brownie points for creating this one Dan? ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:05, 29 May 2007 (EDT)

You definitely do from me, but probably not from the majority of the sysops. LOL just kidding [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:12, 29 May 2007 (EDT)

Hi Dan, I'm trying for sysop now to join you 'elect' guys. I know you've put a 'good job' on my page before so I thought I'd ask what you think of my overall contribution to conservapedia. If you're pleased with my work, I hope you'll drop by and add some comments. Thanks ;-) [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 17:25, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

== Weimar republic ==

Why did you remove the stub? It is more than appropriate for this article. [[User:Order]]

== Protection ==

Hi Dan,

We may be at the point where it would be wise to protect Satan (again) and Hell. I know Satan was opened again to merge in Luficer, but that's been taken care of. Thanks! [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 15:05, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

== Lions Den ==

Dan with a name like yours was it wise to enter the Lion's Den? :-) [[User:DollarsAndSense|DollarsAndSense]] 16:38, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

== Cumbernauld ==

DanH I see you reverted my reversion of this entry. Channel 4, is an incredibly controversial channel in the UK often broadcating sensationalist programs. It's main output is a program called Big Brother where members of the public are locked in a house together in order to be voted out by the public. Even this is fixed as the most sensational members are reinstated to boost viewing figures. It has featured coed type nude jacuzzi scenes and even live sexual acts. It also gave a prime-time slot to Richard Dawkins to attack religious belief. I would not take seriously any reference to programming from this source. [[User:Alban|Alban]] 17:58, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
:Follow the link - [http://www.channel4.com/life/microsites/D/demolition/worst2.html] Or would you prefer a BBC link? Try [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4362410.stm] I have no idea why you have suddenly appeared to defend reversion of my corrections of previous deliberately inserted inaccuracies and falsehoods, but I stand by my edits and the links above refute your opinion. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 18:02, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

::Your BBC link actually refers to a protest by the local council against this slur. [[User:Alban|Alban]] 18:06, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
::: A ''slur'' that has seen the town 3 times voted a "carbuncle" etc. Regardless of the news source, the national opinions remain the same. Attacking the edit by claiming it is a liberalist, pornographers' conspiracy is just peurile. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 18:09, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

::::If your are going to engage in ''ad hominem'' attacks and name calling then I will not continue this discussion. It is not appropriate language for Conservapedia. [[User:Dafydd|Dafydd]] 18:15, 31 May 2007 (EDT)
:::::The word "peurile" is directed at the action, not the person. And did you forget which sock you were supposed to be using? I thought you were [[User:Alban]]...? Sock-puppetry is also a peurile action. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 18:20, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

::::Thank you for your support Dafydd but as a native Scot I think I know what I'm talking about. Cumbernauld is not a monstrous carbuncle and deserves better than being derided by a sensationalist sassenach TV station. [[User:Alban|Alban]] 18:18, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

:::::Oops! Got the correct puppet on now XD [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 18:20, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

::::::Oh yes, very funny. Accuse me of socking. Just because someone else objects to your abusive language. If you want to continue this discussion further then I suggest you move it to one of our talk pages rather than cluttering up a sysops page. [[User:Alban|Alban]] 18:32, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

:::::::Please refer back to [[User talk:Dafydd|your other talk page]] to see confirmation that you were busted via IP address. Nice try. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 18:37, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

==Thanks==
Thanks Dan. I appreciate your support. [[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] [[User_talk:Crocoite|Talk]] 23:29, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

==Why was my edit reverted?==

What's wrong? I'm trying to improve the baraminology article by explaining what the types of people under the Human Holobaramin are. It's what's in the Bible. [[User:BillJones|BillJones]] 02:02, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

The Mongoloid entry was totally racist. For one. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 02:26, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

==Your granny==

I mean, your grammar: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Skylab&curid=28032&diff=186334&oldid=186289] Nice fix! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 22:30, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

Thank you. My Grandmother would expect nothing less. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 22:31, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

== South Africa ==

Dan, there's a lot on this site I disagree with. So be it. But I am glad to see that people here find all those racist bits on South Africa as loathsome as I do. Thanks for nuking all those entries by a guy who seems to be longing for the days of Pik Botha. [[User:Sevenstring|Sevenstring]] 23:15, 1 June 2007 (EDT)

==Capitals==

Thanks for the info. I did search under several titles for US Capitals, etc. but no pages came up. Should I ask a sysop to delete my page, or is that unnecessary? [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] 15:20, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

I think your page looks good, and better than the other one. Maybe if all the links got fixed that would be best. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:23, 4 June 2007 (EDT)

== blocking ==

Hey how can you find the IP for the user, I dont think I have the checkuser button. lol Sorry I might sound dumb.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 16:19, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

I sent the instructions to you through Conservapedia email. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:21, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

::I heard about the email and no one told me how to acess it!--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 16:44, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

How to access your email? It should just be sent to whatever email you signed up to the site with. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:45, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

::O thanks. Um Tk told me you also get a email through conservapedia. So I got that confused.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 16:47, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

That may be what he meant. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:47, 5 June 2007 (EDT)

:Yes, it was. Will, if your email is enabled here, users can email you, CP will forward it to your regular email account. If you reply to them via your email client, they will also have your email. If you respond to them via the CP "email this user" deal, they will not. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 06:05, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

Should I block Brainslug? Brainslug created Zimbardo Cookie Experiment and has had a 2 hour block in his past. [[User:BethanyS|~Beth~]]

Yes. If he wants back, he can email you and plead his case. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 13:17, 6 June 2007 (EDT)

== Question ==

How was your paper on [[Putin]]? [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:17, 11 June 2007 (EDT)
:well done. He is not a good guy. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 15:57, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

== Andorra ==
On the matter of [[Andorra]], look at who the edits before me were made by; [[So Alone]] who was blocked for being a sock of this one guy. Do you think his edits are trustworthy? [[User:UnderCurrent|UnderCurrent]] 16:35, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

Thanks for pointing that out! Definitely not trustworthy. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:38, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

:P.S. Where would one find a compendium on user boxes around here? [[User:UnderCurrent|UnderCurrent]] 16:53, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Userboxes [[User:DanH|DanH]] 16:56, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

== Question ==

Hello, I was looking at the user creation log and I noticed this:

15:08, 12 June 2007 HolographicMedia (Talk | contribs | block) created account for User:OpticalEthernet (Talk | contribs | block)

What happened, and is this allowed? Can users create accounts for others like this?[[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 17:56, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

I'm not sure how that works, but I think that without an explanation given, it generally isn't allowed. I know that HolographicMedia was blocked earlier today. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 17:58, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

== you missed ==
I think you missed [[User:MartyFillmore]]. --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 18:43, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

== Image ==

Hello, Dan. I see you protected an [http://www.conservapedia.com/Image:Balkans.png image] I uploaded. Did you, by any chance, look at the talk page? The image is a modified version of a Wikipedia image, and I wasn't sure if it was acceptable. Thanks! [[User:GregLarson | Greg]] 00:31, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

== War Elephants ==

Hell ya it is!--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 15:25, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

I bet its true [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 17:48, 18 June 2007 (EDT)

== Request for assistence in writing Article. ==

I have noted that two rather influential Supreme Court Justices have not managed to receive articles about them, namely, Hugo L. Black and William O. Douglas. However previous attempts at writing articles have ended in deletion as the result of perhaps a bit too overt a bias, I have the [[William Orville Douglas| beginnings of an article]] but am not remotely certain as to how I should proceed from here without repeating past mistakes. If at all possible could you review the beginnings of the page and lend me some of your wisdom?
Thanks-N. i. V.[[User:Nullius in Verba|Nullius in Verba]] 08:40, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

*Don't bother, Dan. I rather think old Nullius will have a problem with soiled robes, and won't be able to participate. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 09:26, 19 June 2007 (EDT)

==[[Freedom]]==
Dan, have you seen the Freedom entry? [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Freedom&action=history] This article probably needs some serious treatment. Any idea who we can recruit to work on it? Thanks. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:32, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
:I'll ask Karajou. Thanks. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:37, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

::It's on my list, boys. This should have been emailed, to keep from crossing up. --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 08:21, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

==script?==
do we italicize book titles? Thanks!--'''Staple[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Staple HI!]''' 15:01, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

I have before, at least. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 15:02, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

== Vandalism ==

Where was my signature dishonestly used? I'd like to see. '''Scorpion'''[[User_Talk:Scorpion|Vote for Pedro]] 17:50, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

:::I looked through the history and couldn't really find anything that looked like vandalism (except for that crap by Humorless). Could you perhaps direct me to the diff? '''Scorpion'''[[User_Talk:Scorpion|Vote for Pedro]] 15:22, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

==FF Vandal==
Is there something we can do? TK was helping me but he signed off AIM.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 00:03, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

We can lock the database for a few seconds if it doesn't let up. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:04, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

:I don't think thats going to deter him. TK has done it three times now.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 00:07, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

::Who goes to bed at 11?--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 00:18, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

:::Kids. [[User:Niandra|Niandra]] [[User talk:Niandra|talk]] 00:19, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

When I was a kid, I wasn't allowed online past 11. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 00:18, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
::When I was a kid we didn't have internet...--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 00:20, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
:::Liar! That was me! :p --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 01:59, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
::::Ok, lemme rephrase, when I was a kid we couldn't AFFORD the internet.--[[User:Elamdri|Elamdri]] 02:01, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

== Hi There! ==

I hear that you're against Wikipedia. Me too. They accused me for '''Disruption, Single purpose account created for AFD purposes'''. I like you and your site.--[[User:Edtropolis|Edtropolis]] 15:38, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

== Back ==

[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk%3AHojimachong&diff=205937&oldid=205934 thanks]! My final marks for the year were five "A"s and one "B". --[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']][[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]] 22:41, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

== Thank you for the welcome ==

As a disgruntled former Wikipedian, I appreciate it. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 23:34, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

== Keepp fighting ==

Ya will do but I am going away until next monday which would be july 2.--[[User:Will N.|Will N.]] 14:11, 24 June 2007 (EDT)

==WoW article==

We had a guy copy and paste a bunch of junk to the article from wikipedia, but I accidentally edited it before I caught it. Is it possible to rollback to BethanyS's edit, or does it have to be done manually?

I got it. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 19:06, 24 June 2007 (EDT)

==Samoza regime==
What a joke. It never takes long for bleedingheartliberal's to respond after upsetting their plans. Thanks. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Somoza_regime&action=history]

==Philistines==
LoL - I would have picked it up when I rewrite it later, honest :P - need to watch "Heroes" first though, back in a blink [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] ([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]]) 16:44, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

== Your question ==

Because I think many people may search that word.

== Dissidents ==

Not much of an article unless it gives some examples, no? [[User:Guitarplayer|Guitarplayer]] 18:06, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
At least my version didn't editorialise, but provided a list I was hoping to expand [[User:Guitarplayer|Guitarplayer]] 18:07, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

== VANDAL ==

Someone is being a busy boy - shut him down [[User:Guitarplayer|Guitarplayer]] 18:22, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

==Wiki Research==
Thanks for your help. [[User:Sutton4019|Sutton4019]] 10:02, 26 June 2007 (EDT)

== Hello Dan ==

Hi Dan, as someone who is not a conservative, I'm seeking your view for recent changes made at John the Baptist. I am concerned with the direction taken and the actions taken to force a change to stand that I believe is inappropriate. Could you please add your input? Thanks [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:54, 28 June 2007 (EDT)

== Thanks ==
I appreciate the unblocking. It just came to my attention. Do you have any idea how it came to happen? I had never done any edits here when I was blocked.--[[User:Neiljohnson|Neiljohnson]] 15:09, 29 June 2007 (EDT)

==Funny Coincidence==
Ha,ha! I was in the process of blocking ihatefags when you did it! --[[User:BethanyS|Beth]][[User talk:BethanyS|Talk]] 15:45, 29 June 2007 (EDT)
::What happened earlier? It looked frightening. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 01:11, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

It's a really long story. Email me. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 01:12, 1 July 2007 (EDT)
:Will do. [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 01:13, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

== I left some funny messages...... ==

For our dear friends on their talk pages. I know you will enjoy! :p --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 03:52, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

==Mountain Dew==

To the most stimulating (and highly caffeinated) sysop I know, welcome back! Yo da man! Woo woo! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 23:11, 1 July 2007 (EDT)

== narniaexpert ==

Ok sorry about all the troll before. I was trying to see if I could hack it unlike wikipedia. Good job anyway. Well WHY DO YOU KEEP BLOCKING ME!!! I gave up trying to see if I could hack you guys. I was making up for it by contributing to the site I hand wrote an article about Linkin Park and was working on beefing up the Walt Disney page and what do you do DELETE ME! If your going to delete me then atleast leave up my hard work on the Linkin Park page. I'm really sorry about the troll just please let me get back and add some more articles to increse the site's slim number of music/tech articles.

BTW if you look up troll in the dictionary it is defined as repedidly posting offensive content repedtively onto websites. I don't consider Disneyland very offensive lol ;-P anyway sorry for the troll but could you please let me finish putting up some Apple related pages.

*Cobblenet, if your contribs are legit, you are welcome here. Just spare us any vanalism, and keep to the editors rules...and I'll let you live tonight, and Dan can decide tomorrow, okay? That fair? --[[User:TK|Sysop-TK]] [[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]] 01:02, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

*Ok but what are the editors rules exactly. I was actualy talking about my real account Narniaexpert [[User_talk:narniaexpert|/Narniaexpert]] not my sock puppet

== Can you help ==

I am trying to add a universal infobox template to US presidents but cannot access the following
#Richard Nixon
#Ronald Wilson Reagan
#George H. W. Bush
#George W. Bush
Could you either unlock them for me for a short period to make the additions, or add the info on my behalf. Thanks [[User:BrianCo|BrianCo]] 15:52, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

==Team contest==

I would like to have you on my team in our new [[Conservapedia:Team contest|team contest]]. Please let me know if you are able to compete. ~ [[User:SharonS|Sharon]][[User talk:SharonS|Talk]] 16:30, 2 July 2007 (EDT)

== John54 ==

The name, the time without doing nothing, are the same profile of vandals. We can see if he is not, waiting for a mail asking unblocking. This procedure has become necessary as we are under fire. The instructions are "it is better to make a mistake than to allow vandals". But you may unblock him if you consider it proper. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 16:30, 4 July 2007 (EDT)

==Hello!==

How are you, Dan? --[[User:Samian|Samian]]

== Arguments for God ==

Um, not trying to be difficult, but what was the reason for your revert? [[User:MikeK|Mike K]] 21:29, 4 July 2007 (EDT)

==Dan is mean==

Hey dan, whats up with you blocking people for no reason. Shouldn't people be able to be here peacefully without breaking any of the rules? what's your deal?