<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Oaktree</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Oaktree"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Oaktree"/>
	<updated>2026-10-10T05:47:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Linguistics&amp;diff=770570</id>
		<title>Linguistics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Linguistics&amp;diff=770570"/>
		<updated>2010-04-19T12:20:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oaktree: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Linguistics''' is the scientific study of [[language]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Linguist and far-left writer [[Noam Chomsky]] defined the central purpose of modern linguistics is to address the question: What is a possible human grammar? This is done by studying typologically diverse languages in order to arrive at principles common to all languages. These common principles are hypothesized to be innate in human beings as a matter of biological endowment. It is generally accepted in the field that the innateness of grammatical principles accounts for why a child acquires language exceptionally rapidly in the face of insufficient stimuli or reinforcement from his or her community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://informatics.indiana.edu/rocha/univgram.html] Universal Grammar&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:linguistics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oaktree</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Noam_Chomsky&amp;diff=770569</id>
		<title>Talk:Noam Chomsky</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Noam_Chomsky&amp;diff=770569"/>
		<updated>2010-04-19T12:18:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oaktree: /* 'The academic world's biggest hypocrite' */  forgot to sign!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;why do you keep reverting my edits, its not vandalism, its removing POV --[[User:UncleJalapeno4|UncleJalapeno4]] 09:11, 19 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Noam's support for Hezbolla is not just an accusation, it's a fact.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 00:33, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cite it --[[User:DemocraticSocialist|DemocraticSocialist]] 10:52, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, i checked out the source, but it is pretty suspect. It has a strong right wing bias. How can we even be sure Chomsky said that. I've heard Chomsky denounce dictatorships of all political ideologies, and the only thing I've heard him say about the Khmer Rouge is why are they getting all the media attention while the Indonesian genocide is ignored. How is saying that supporting the Khmer Rouge. --[[User:DemocraticSocialist|DemocraticSocialist]] 11:01, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well looks like you were right, Noam did meet with Hezbollah commanders, I'm dissappointed that Noam would speak with terrorists but just because he speaks with them doesn't mean he supports their brutal methods. Besides George Bush meets with Colombian president Uribe and the Saudi Arabian government and they are both terror states. --[[User:DemocraticSocialist|DemocraticSocialist]] 11:54, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite true. I don't understand why my (very measured) edits were deleted. It is a demonstrable fact that he does not support Hamas, nor did he support the Soviet Union, which he (again, in fact) described repeatedly as &amp;quot;a dungeon.&amp;quot; He also, smaller point, identifies himself as a libertarian socialist, not an anarcho-syndicalist; perhaps that last bit is semantics, but still. --[[User:Keep_the_faith|Keep the faith]] 6:15, 22 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The terms `libertarian socialist' and `anarcho-syndicalist' are pretty much interchangable [[User:Michaelmuffin|Michaelmuffin]] 22:16, 29 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::That's not necessarily true, actually. Anarcho-syndicalism is a type of libertarian socialism, but libertarian socialism is not necessarily anarcho-syndicalism. Anarcho-syndicalism itself is typically only a component of a wider ideology, usually anarcho-collectivism or anarcho-communism, as it focuses on workers' liberation, while the wider philosophies of anarcho-collectivism and anarcho-communism focus on society as a whole. (There's a distinction between those two as well.) I don't remember exactly what type of libertarian socialist Chomsky is, though he's almost certainly an anarcho-collectivist or anarcho-communist, probably the latter. --[[User:Agnapostate|Agnapostate]] 18:47, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== the agenda against Chomsky here ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've made a few edits.  The only not so suspect piece is the one viz. his 2006 visit with Nasrallah.  He explains it thus, as he wrote to me: &amp;quot;I visited Lebanon to give talks at the American U[niversity] of Beirut. While in Lebanon, I tried to meet as wide a range of leading figures as I could, along with popular groups, in order to learn something about the country, as I do everywhere, in fact as any sane person does who wants to learn something about a country and is not merely interested in repeating some Party Line. I therefore was pleased to be invited to speak to Nasrallah, the head of Hizbollah, and ... to be invited to Walid Jumblatt's Mukhtara, where I spent considerably longer time with him than with Nasrallah, including a meal... Jumblatt ... is not only one of the leading political figures in Lebanon, but also the most outspoken supporter of the US war in Iraq and the most outspoken opponent of Hizbollah.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rest, excluding the more-or-less comments about his linguistic theory (of which I am mostly ignorant), is just slander.  There is also no mention of his past involvement with Hashomer Hatzair, but apparently that doesn't fit the agenda here.  I'm no fan of the idolatrous, unthinking adoration a lot of people have for him.  All that is required is a fair representation, which is not provided; I made the edits, in a small way, to steer the article toward that standard.{{unsigned|Keep the faith}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;--------------&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; YOU SUCK AT LINGUISTICS ---------------&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If you're going to criticize Chomsky's work, you may want to start calling it by its right name. &amp;quot;Genitive grammar&amp;quot; doesn't exist. There's a genitive case, but not a genitive grammar. You're thinking about the generative grammar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to you guys, Chomsky's work has been criticized because it's been done primarily in English. This is like saying an American sociologist's work is not worth looking at because he only studies sociology from an American perspective. Also, Chomsky's work has been applied to thousands of languages (all of the SOV/SVO/OVS/OSV/VOS/VSO types), so you were pretty much just wrong about that. I'm sorry I had to be the one to tell you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, a lot of the UG boils down to things like implicational universals which have been statistically tested more rigorously than most scientific theories. If you don't know what these are, you probably shouldn't be arguing about linguistics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, Chomsky DOES make predictions about what is possible in a language. Have you even read any of his work or did you just cite one of his critics without even understanding who the guy was? Sampson is a joke to linguists.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;--------------&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; YOU SUCK AT LINGUISTICS ---------------&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Who you talking to?  If you want your hypertext to get read, you can try being civil.  If you think your qualified to speak on this subkect, you can establish yourself as something other than a troll.  Meantime, so long sucka.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:55, 21 August 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 'The academic world's biggest hypocrite' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the meaning of calling Chomsky 'the academic world's biggest hypocrite'? I know his marxist views and double-standards when talking about foreign policy are disgraceful, but he's still quite a good linguist, from what I hear. I don't really know anything about his genitive grammer, but it seems to be quite important in the field, him being the most cited academic author of all time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Oaktree|Oaktree]] 08:18, 19 April 2010 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oaktree</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Noam_Chomsky&amp;diff=770568</id>
		<title>Talk:Noam Chomsky</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Noam_Chomsky&amp;diff=770568"/>
		<updated>2010-04-19T12:17:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oaktree: /* 'The academic world's biggest hypocrite' */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;why do you keep reverting my edits, its not vandalism, its removing POV --[[User:UncleJalapeno4|UncleJalapeno4]] 09:11, 19 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Noam's support for Hezbolla is not just an accusation, it's a fact.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 00:33, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cite it --[[User:DemocraticSocialist|DemocraticSocialist]] 10:52, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, i checked out the source, but it is pretty suspect. It has a strong right wing bias. How can we even be sure Chomsky said that. I've heard Chomsky denounce dictatorships of all political ideologies, and the only thing I've heard him say about the Khmer Rouge is why are they getting all the media attention while the Indonesian genocide is ignored. How is saying that supporting the Khmer Rouge. --[[User:DemocraticSocialist|DemocraticSocialist]] 11:01, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well looks like you were right, Noam did meet with Hezbollah commanders, I'm dissappointed that Noam would speak with terrorists but just because he speaks with them doesn't mean he supports their brutal methods. Besides George Bush meets with Colombian president Uribe and the Saudi Arabian government and they are both terror states. --[[User:DemocraticSocialist|DemocraticSocialist]] 11:54, 20 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Quite true. I don't understand why my (very measured) edits were deleted. It is a demonstrable fact that he does not support Hamas, nor did he support the Soviet Union, which he (again, in fact) described repeatedly as &amp;quot;a dungeon.&amp;quot; He also, smaller point, identifies himself as a libertarian socialist, not an anarcho-syndicalist; perhaps that last bit is semantics, but still. --[[User:Keep_the_faith|Keep the faith]] 6:15, 22 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The terms `libertarian socialist' and `anarcho-syndicalist' are pretty much interchangable [[User:Michaelmuffin|Michaelmuffin]] 22:16, 29 September 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::That's not necessarily true, actually. Anarcho-syndicalism is a type of libertarian socialism, but libertarian socialism is not necessarily anarcho-syndicalism. Anarcho-syndicalism itself is typically only a component of a wider ideology, usually anarcho-collectivism or anarcho-communism, as it focuses on workers' liberation, while the wider philosophies of anarcho-collectivism and anarcho-communism focus on society as a whole. (There's a distinction between those two as well.) I don't remember exactly what type of libertarian socialist Chomsky is, though he's almost certainly an anarcho-collectivist or anarcho-communist, probably the latter. --[[User:Agnapostate|Agnapostate]] 18:47, 11 October 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== the agenda against Chomsky here ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've made a few edits.  The only not so suspect piece is the one viz. his 2006 visit with Nasrallah.  He explains it thus, as he wrote to me: &amp;quot;I visited Lebanon to give talks at the American U[niversity] of Beirut. While in Lebanon, I tried to meet as wide a range of leading figures as I could, along with popular groups, in order to learn something about the country, as I do everywhere, in fact as any sane person does who wants to learn something about a country and is not merely interested in repeating some Party Line. I therefore was pleased to be invited to speak to Nasrallah, the head of Hizbollah, and ... to be invited to Walid Jumblatt's Mukhtara, where I spent considerably longer time with him than with Nasrallah, including a meal... Jumblatt ... is not only one of the leading political figures in Lebanon, but also the most outspoken supporter of the US war in Iraq and the most outspoken opponent of Hizbollah.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rest, excluding the more-or-less comments about his linguistic theory (of which I am mostly ignorant), is just slander.  There is also no mention of his past involvement with Hashomer Hatzair, but apparently that doesn't fit the agenda here.  I'm no fan of the idolatrous, unthinking adoration a lot of people have for him.  All that is required is a fair representation, which is not provided; I made the edits, in a small way, to steer the article toward that standard.{{unsigned|Keep the faith}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;--------------&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; YOU SUCK AT LINGUISTICS ---------------&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
If you're going to criticize Chomsky's work, you may want to start calling it by its right name. &amp;quot;Genitive grammar&amp;quot; doesn't exist. There's a genitive case, but not a genitive grammar. You're thinking about the generative grammar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to you guys, Chomsky's work has been criticized because it's been done primarily in English. This is like saying an American sociologist's work is not worth looking at because he only studies sociology from an American perspective. Also, Chomsky's work has been applied to thousands of languages (all of the SOV/SVO/OVS/OSV/VOS/VSO types), so you were pretty much just wrong about that. I'm sorry I had to be the one to tell you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, a lot of the UG boils down to things like implicational universals which have been statistically tested more rigorously than most scientific theories. If you don't know what these are, you probably shouldn't be arguing about linguistics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, Chomsky DOES make predictions about what is possible in a language. Have you even read any of his work or did you just cite one of his critics without even understanding who the guy was? Sampson is a joke to linguists.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;--------------&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; YOU SUCK AT LINGUISTICS ---------------&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Who you talking to?  If you want your hypertext to get read, you can try being civil.  If you think your qualified to speak on this subkect, you can establish yourself as something other than a troll.  Meantime, so long sucka.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:55, 21 August 2009 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 'The academic world's biggest hypocrite' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is the meaning of calling Chomsky 'the academic world's biggest hypocrite'? I know his marxist views and double-standards when talking about foreign policy are disgraceful, but he's still quite a good linguist, from what I hear. I don't really know anything about his genitive grammer, but it seems to be quite important in the field, him being the most cited academic author of all time.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oaktree</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dail_Eireann&amp;diff=770567</id>
		<title>Dail Eireann</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dail_Eireann&amp;diff=770567"/>
		<updated>2010-04-19T12:08:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oaktree: Correcting spelling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Dail Eireann''' is the parliament of the [[Republic of Ireland]].  Members of Dail Eireann are known as Teachtaí Dála ([[TD]]), which is [[Gaelic]] for [[Member of Parliament]] ([[MP]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ireland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:International Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oaktree</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet&amp;diff=770563</id>
		<title>Internet</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet&amp;diff=770563"/>
		<updated>2010-04-19T11:56:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oaktree: /* Keeping Pornography out of the Reach of Children */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Internet''' is a global network of interconnected smaller [[computer]] networks. Data is transmitted between computers and networks in small packets using the Internet Protocol (IP); they are reassembled at their destination. It originated in work funded by the Advanced Research Projects Administration (ARPA), a research funding arm of the [[Department of Defense]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Origin==&lt;br /&gt;
The conceptual foundation for the internet's creation was significantly developed by three individuals and a research conference, each of which changed the way we thought about communication, business and the exchange of technology:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Vannevar Bush wrote the first description of the potential uses for information technology with his description of the &amp;quot;memex&amp;quot; automated library system. &lt;br /&gt;
*Norbert Wiener invented the field of Cybernetics, encouraging future researchers to focus on the use of technology to extend human capabilities. &lt;br /&gt;
*The 1956 Dartmouth Artificial Intelligence conference defined the concept that technology was improving at an exponential rate, and provided the first serious consideration of the consequences, the benefits and advantages or such a network. &lt;br /&gt;
*Marshall McLuhan made the idea of a global village interconnected by an electronic nervous system part of our popular culture. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.livinginternet.com/i/ii.htm &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Ethan K. Heinz (cousin of Teresa Heinz), originally developed Internet as ARPANET in the US as a means for various institutes to communicate with each other even in an event such as war. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.internetisseriousbusiness.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Internet has grown into a worldwide computer network where anyone can have a chat with anyone else almost anywhere in the world, and is a vast source of free information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
The Internet is sometimes also known as &amp;quot;[[cyberspace]].&amp;quot; Most users are familiar with the [[World Wide Web]] of homepages, marked up with [[HTML]]; the Web is facilitated by one of numerous protocols that operate on the Internet. There is also [[email]], [[FTP|file transfer]], etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The common protocol used to access websites (including this one) is the Hyper-Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP). The creator of this is [[Sir Tim Berners-Lee]], who recently in an online magazine article claimed that given the opportunity, he wouldn't use the HTTP format for websites. Berners-Lee is currently the director of the W3C (World Wide Web Consortium).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ted Stevens]] famously referred to the internet as &amp;quot;a series of tubes&amp;quot; during a panel on [[network neutrality]]. While the statement was technically inaccurate, it is a reasonable depiction of the internet as an interconnected system to a lay person. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The internet is formed from two basic elements, routers and connections. A router is basically a small computer that acts like a switching station, similar to the pumping stations of public water utilities. The connections are the pipes themselves, acting as a means to move packets from one router to another, and eventually from server to client.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Internet has been shown to contain valuable information, it also contains pornographic or otherwise vulgar material. Therefore, some conservatives would like to see tighter controls on the Internet which would limit what can be hosted and what can be downloaded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999, [[Democratic]] presidential candidate [[Al Gore]] misspoke when intending to take partial credit for the development of the internet when he referenced his High Performance [[Computing]] and Communication Act of 1991, commonly known as the &amp;quot;Gore Bill&amp;quot;:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/03/09/president.2000/transcript.gore/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:CNN's WOLF BLITZER: I want to get to some of the substance of domestic and international issues in a minute, but let's just wrap up a little bit of the politics right now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Why should Democrats, looking at the Democratic nomination process, support you instead of Bill Bradley, a friend of yours, a former colleague in the Senate? What do you have to bring to this that he doesn't necessarily bring to this process?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:AL GORE: Well, I will be offering -- I'll be offering my vision when my campaign begins. And it will be comprehensive and sweeping. And I hope that it will be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to [[Al Gore|Al Gore's]] comments, [[Robert Kahn]] and [[Vinton Cerf]], the two men responsible for the creation of the [[TCP/IP]] protocol which the internet uses for most of its communication and two men often credited as the creators of the internet along with [[Sir Tim Berners-Lee]], said the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Al Gore was the first political leader to recognize the importance of the Internet and to promote and support its development.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;No one person or even small group of persons exclusively “invented” the Internet. It is the result of many years of ongoing collaboration among people in government and the university community.  But as the two people who designed the basic architecture and the core protocols that make the Internet work, we would like to acknowledge VP Gore’s contributions as a Congressman, Senator and as Vice President.  No other elected official, to our knowledge, has made a greater contribution over a longer period of time.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Last year the Vice President made a straightforward statement on his role.  He said: &amp;quot;During my service in the United States Congress I took the initiative in creating the Internet.&amp;quot;  We don't think, as some people have argued, that Gore intended to claim he &amp;quot;invented&amp;quot; the Internet. Moreover, there is no question in our minds that while serving as Senator, Gore's initiatives had a significant and beneficial effect on the still-evolving Internet. The fact of the matter is that Gore was talking about and promoting the Internet long before most people were listening.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/200009/msg00052.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their letter continued to go on to enumerate Al Gore's involvement in the early periods of the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping Pornography out of the Reach of Children==&lt;br /&gt;
Studies have shown that 90% of children have been exposed to pornography, with the average age of exposure being 11 years old &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.healthymind.com/s-porn-stats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Many countries have attempted to take steps to keep underage children from viewing pornographic material. [[Australia]] has taken the important step of requiring [[internet service providers]] to use web filters to keep inappropriate material from being displayed in houses and schools&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/31/2129471.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This effort is being blocked by civil liberties groups (such as the [[American Civil Liberties Union]]) who believe that pornagrophy should be considered [[free speech]], and therefore not under the jurisdiction of the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently many private companies offer software-based web filtering for home use. [[Public school|Public schools]] in many US states are required to employ web filters. Most [[private schools]], [[libraries]], and employers also choose to use web filters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Digital Philosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://crave.cnet.co.uk/software/0,39029471,49299033,00.htm The 50 most significant moments of Internet history], ''Crave at CNET.co.uk'', September 25, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Information technology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Internet]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oaktree</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fianna_F%C3%A1il&amp;diff=770562</id>
		<title>Fianna Fáil</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fianna_F%C3%A1il&amp;diff=770562"/>
		<updated>2010-04-19T11:53:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Oaktree: A more accurate description of the word's pronunciation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Fianna Fail''' ([[Irish]]: 'Soldiers of Destiny'; pronounced ''Feena Foil'') is the main [[Conservative]] [[political party]] in the [[Republic of Ireland]]. The party was founded in 1926 by [[Eamon de Valera]]; and each of the seven party leaders in its history have held the office of [[Taoiseach]] ([[Prime Minister]]). The current Taoiseach, [[Brian Cowen]], is the leader of FF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.fiannafail.ie/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Ireland]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Parties]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Oaktree</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>