Talk:General theory of relativity

2009-11-14T00:21:32Z

NiggurTits:

==Higher math template?==

Question: I know we have this template for sections that get into early-undergrad math:

{{Template:Math-h}}

But the quantitative section is going to make (gentle) reference to tensor algebra and some aspects of differential geometry. Do we have a template that somehow conveys "this section is hard-core math, but don't be scared?" Or maybe something that gets across the idea that you don't have to follow everything in this section to understand this article?

==Proofread?==

I'm going to leave this page half-done for tonight and pick it up tomorrow. Anybody available to give what's there right now a proofread? I'd love any and all feedback. --[[User:KSorenson|KSorenson]] 18:45, 13 November 2009 (EST)

:The math is way out of my depth, but I tried clarifying the section about Eddington's experiment. It now says what I think it said - if I'm way off-base, please correct me. -- [[User:EvanW|EvanW]] 19:01, 13 November 2009 (EST)
::Yep, everything in there seems okay. Can't wait to read the rest of the article.--[[User:DanHutchin|DanHutchin]] 19:14, 13 November 2009 (EST)
:::Please, please open your mind, for your sake. Liberals like to deny the powerful lesson of Popper's theory of falsifiability, but we don't fall for that liberal claptrap here. [[User:NiggurTits|NiggurTits]] 19:21, 13 November 2009 (EST)

Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

Talk:General theory of relativity