<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Nick227</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Nick227"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Nick227"/>
	<updated>2026-10-07T14:35:34Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Same-sex_marriage&amp;diff=202063</id>
		<title>Same-sex marriage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Same-sex_marriage&amp;diff=202063"/>
		<updated>2007-06-19T18:58:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nick227: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;''', also referred to as [[homosexuality|gay]] marriage or [[homosexuality|homosexual]] marriage, is the official certification in jurisdictions that allow a union between two people of the same sex. Social conservatives regard it as immoral, and argue that use of the word &amp;quot;[[marriage]]&amp;quot; is a misnomer, because the [[Form of Solemnization of Matrimony|marriage services]] of Christian denominations define marriage as the union of a man and a woman,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.g. &amp;quot;Dearly beloved: We have come together in the presence of God to witness and bless the joining together of this man and this woman in Holy Matrimony.&amp;quot; ''The Book of Common Prayer,'' Episcopal Church, The Church Hymnal Corporation and the Seabury Press, 1979: &amp;quot;The Celebration and Blessing of a Marriage,&amp;quot; p. 423&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a definition which was also written into United States federal law in 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. James Dobson's [[Focus on the Family]] refers to the phrase ''same-sex 'marriage,''' with quotation marks around the word ''marriage,'' to call attention to the fact that marriage&amp;amp;mdash;civil as well as religious&amp;amp;mdash;is intrinsically a union between a man and a woman, and that therefore same-sex unions are &amp;quot;counterfeits.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.family.org/socialissues/A000000464.cfm Same-Sex 'Marriage' and Civil Unions], ''Focus on the Family's'' website&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abuse of the term was unheard of a few decades ago, however these unions are now among a number of issues advocated by [[gay rights]] activists.  In the United States, marriage is primarily governed by each individual state and marriage laws differ from state to state. Several states allow &amp;quot;civil unions&amp;quot; between two people of the same sex, and one, Massachusetts, currently allows it under the name &amp;quot;marriage.&amp;quot; These marriages are not recognized by the Federal government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1996 Congress recognized the likelihood that gay rights advocates would soon seek changes in some states. It was concerned about the possibility of test cases reaching the Supreme Court, and of the court conceivably ruling that a state&amp;amp;mdash;even though it prohibits gay marriage itself&amp;amp;mdash;must honor gay marriages performed in another state. The Defense of Marriage act, which was passed and signed by President Clinton, prevents this possibility, and also prevents the Federal Government from recognizing marriage as anything other than a union between a man and a woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 a Vermont court ruled that under its constitution, it was not required to allow &amp;quot;same-sex marriage&amp;quot; but was required to make provisions to grant same-sex couples legal rights identical to those provided by marriage. Vermont responded by creating &amp;quot;civil unions,&amp;quot; which are legally distinct from marriages but convey the same rights. As of 2007, California, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Maine also provide civil unions or domestic partnerships. Beginning in 2008, the states of Washington, Oregon, and New Hampshire will also provide same-sex unions.  Hawaii provides certain benefits to same sex couples.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--civilunions-optio0531may31,0,341613.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut Newsday]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 2003 the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that under Massachusetts' constitution, same-sex couples could not be denied Massachusetts marriage licenses, making Massachusetts the sole state to issue same-sex marriage licenses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Because of an established Massachusetts law, Massachusetts same-sex marriages are all-but-limited to Massachusetts residents. The law says that an out-of-state couple cannot be married if their marriage would not be recognized in their home state. The same-sex marriages are not recognized under federal law or in most other states.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The religious ceremony of marriage is governed by each denomination and is unaffected by laws passed by civil authority. Same-sex marriage is forbidden in Orthodox Judaism, Catholicism, and most mainstream Protestant denominations. Thus, even in Massachusetts, it would be close to impossible for a same-sex couple to find a Catholic priest willing to marry them in a church, or an Orthodox rabbi willing to marry them in a temple.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Public attitude toward same-sex marriage parallels attitude toward homosexuality. In general, it is opposed by social conservatives and outside of this group, support is split down the middle leaning to opposition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Relationships/same_sex_marriage_poll_040121.html Same Sex Marriage Poll from ABC News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Issues ==&lt;br /&gt;
James Dobson of ''Focus on the Family'' suggests that the motivation of those advocating same-sex marriage is not to secure the benefits of marriage for gay couples, but to destroy the institution of marriage itself:&lt;br /&gt;
:...most gays and lesbians do not want to marry each other. That would entangle them in all sorts of legal constraints. Who needs a lifetime commitment to one person? The intention here is to destroy marriage altogether. With marriage as we know it gone, everyone would enjoy all the legal benefits of marriage (custody rights, tax-free inheritance, joint ownership of property, health care and spousal citizenship, etc.,) without limiting the number of partners or their gender. Nor would &amp;quot;couples&amp;quot; be bound to each other in the eyes of the law. This is clearly where the movement is headed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.focusonthefamily.com/docstudy/newsletters/A000000771.cfm Marriage on the Ropes], Dr. James Dobson, retrieved from ''Focus on the Family'', 15 May 2007. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 However, this is clearly complete shit.&lt;br /&gt;
==Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law|Same-Sex marriage]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nick227</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:United_Kingdom&amp;diff=160523</id>
		<title>Talk:United Kingdom</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:United_Kingdom&amp;diff=160523"/>
		<updated>2007-05-14T17:49:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nick227: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Darts? ==&lt;br /&gt;
I live in the U.K. and last time i looked darts was not a popular sport. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'Great Britain' redirects automatically to 'United Kingdom.' This is incorrect as the two terms are not interchangeable. The former is strictly the name of the Island which comprises the Mainland of England, Scotland and Wales, whereas the United Kingdom, is the name of a country, who's territory extends over many islands, including Northern Ireland. There should be a seperate article for 'Great Britain.'  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It is true that this difference needs to be made clear in the entry -- but there seems little sense in having a separate entry for two such overlapping entities! [[User:Boethius|Boethius]] 11:04, 22 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's a fair point I suppose! &lt;br /&gt;
Consider it done : )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I see that &amp;quot;Great Britain&amp;quot; still redirects here.--[[User:British_cons|British_cons]] [[User_talk:British_cons|(talk)]] 06:40, 23 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::The [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland]] also redirects here, which is the entity before Ireland got its independence. I put the redirect there for now to simply allow articles like [[War of 1812]] to link to other articles, but someone who knows a lot on the history of those countries should fix it. [[User:GodlessLiberal|GodlessLiberal]] 23:03, 31 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Currency==&lt;br /&gt;
Not changed the article text but I'm 99% sure that while English money is legal tender in Scotland, NI et al the reverse isn't true - can anyone confirm this &amp;amp; if so amend the article appropriately? [[User:Tracy C Copeland|Tracy C Copeland]] 13:24, 22 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The paragraph, as it is, is ok and correct - you could expand it if you wanted to, but the situation's a little complex:&lt;br /&gt;
:*Bank of England coins are legal tender throughout the UK.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Bank of England notes are only legal tender in England and Wales (and possibly Channel Islands &amp;amp; Isle of Man).&lt;br /&gt;
:*Channel Islands &amp;amp; Isle of Man notes and coins are only legal tender those jurisdictions.&lt;br /&gt;
:*Scottish &amp;amp; NI notes aren't legal tender anywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
:*So no notes are legal tender in Scotland &amp;amp; NI at all.&lt;br /&gt;
:But &amp;quot;legal tender&amp;quot; doesn't really mean anything. All the forms of currency are perfectly acceptable anywhere in the UK - you'd have a hard time convincing a court that you had a right not to accept Scottish notes (for payment of debt) just because they aren't &amp;quot;legal tender&amp;quot;. I got this information from [http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/banknotes/about/faqs.htm here], [http://www.siliconglen.com/Scotland/1_7.html here] and [http://www.royalmint.com/RoyalMint/web/site/Corporate/Home/Corp_faq.asp here] --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 20:10, 22 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anthem==&lt;br /&gt;
Wales is the only country of the UK to have an official national anthem. Scotland hasn't (&amp;quot;Flower of Scotland&amp;quot; is definitely not official), England hasn't, and &amp;quot;God Save the Queen&amp;quot; is not even the official anthem of the UK. [[User:Dorpfeld|Dorpfeld]] 15:30, 22 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Article has a superfluous &amp;quot;The&amp;quot; in the title. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have no problems with the article but why is the title &amp;quot;'''The''' United Kingdom&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;United Kingdom&amp;quot;? After all there are not articles for &amp;quot;'''The''' People's Republic of China&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;'''The''' United States of America&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps someone could move the page to &amp;quot;United Kingdom&amp;quot;...? It would then be more consistent with other names, easier to search for, and easier to link to. --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 19:21, 26 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Since &amp;quot;United Kingdom&amp;quot; redirects to &amp;quot;The United Kingdom&amp;quot; searching and linking shouldn't be a problem but I agree it should probably be changed for consistency. --[[User:JamesK|JamesK]] 10:02, 27 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Headline text ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Headline text ==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nick227</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&amp;diff=160507</id>
		<title>Gun control</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&amp;diff=160507"/>
		<updated>2007-05-14T17:38:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nick227: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Gun control laws have been enacted at the federal, state, and local level with the intent of placing restrictions on the right of individual private citizens to own [[firearms]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A common use of firearms is to defend one's life, though accidental death of those who are attacking often occurs. In fact,out of all guns used in the home last year, only 2% were used against an intruder. Gun control laws are often seen to conflict with the [[Second Amendment]] to the [[United States Constitution]], which recognizes the right to bear arms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Second Amendment reads: &amp;quot;A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Gun control''' is the regulation by governments of [[gun]] ownership and the right to carry, conceal, or use [[firearm]]s.  Such measures can range from a total prohibition on civilian ownership and possession of firearms and ammunition to specific restrictions on certain firearm features, &amp;quot;waiting periods&amp;quot; for gun purchases, licensing of gun owners, registration of firearms, etc.  Increased &amp;quot;gun control&amp;quot; is generally promoted by pacifists and [[liberals]] as a remedy to [[crime]].  In fact, whether or not guns are officially controlled by the government, criminals will commit crimes, and a black market will exist to provide them with firearms.  For instance, despite the prohibition of handgun ownership in the [[United Kingdom]], an island nation without any neighboring &amp;quot;gun culture&amp;quot; nations, handgun crime has been steadily increasing there for many years. As of 2005/06, the total deaths by shooting in the UK had increased to 50.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs07/hosb0207.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Comparably, the United States suffered 11,350 gun deaths in 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;However, it should be noted that the USA has a population approximately 5 times greater than the UK, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0004997.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the number of murders by shooting is approximately 200 times higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;right to keep and bear arms&amp;quot; is a right guaranteed to the American citizen by the Bill of Rights through the virtue of a selective reading of said Bill. The phrase &amp;quot;a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state&amp;quot; precedes the statement, and most federal circuits [[cour]ts of appeals]] have held that this phrase requires that the &amp;quot;right to bear arms&amp;quot; relates to the collective rights of state militias, as opposed to the individual's rights to have any weapon desired.  Just recently, the Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit went against nine other circuits in holding that the Second Amendment constitutes an individual right.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/10/washington/10gun.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258067,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
The end effect of gun control laws is the reduction of gun crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Gun control&amp;quot; is the use of legislation to place restrictions on the right to bear arms right. This can include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Restricting which persons can own firearms.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Restrictions on the number of firearms a person may own, or purchase during a given time period&lt;br /&gt;
* Requirements that privately owned firearms be registered with the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Bans on certain types of firearms; for example, &amp;quot;handguns&amp;quot; or assault rifles&lt;br /&gt;
* Restrictions on where firearms may be carried, for example into restaurants or post offices&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring a &amp;quot;background check&amp;quot; and/or a &amp;quot;waiting period&amp;quot; to purchase a firearm&lt;br /&gt;
* Restricting when and where firearms may be bought and sold, for example banning their sale through the mail&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring licenses or some other form of permission from the government to buy and/or sell a firearm&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring some form of permission from the government to carry a firearm in public, either concealed or openly&lt;br /&gt;
* Laws granting special gun rights for some people, for example retired law enforcement officers, which are denied the rest of the public, which was used in several southern states.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Outright bans on carrying firearms in public&lt;br /&gt;
* Outright bans on private possession of firearms, though this has never occurred in the United States&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States the three primary federal gun control laws are:&lt;br /&gt;
* National Firearms Act (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* Gun Control Act (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
* Brady Bill (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These laws have further been amended by other laws such as the Firearms Owners Protection Act (1986) and the Omnibus Crime Bill (1994).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Objections to gun control==&lt;br /&gt;
Studies by John Lott and others indicate that gun control causes higher crime rates&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.johnrlott.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  [[Washington, D.C.]] has one of the highest crime rates in America even though it completely bans private handguns &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/dccrime.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After decades of increasing gun control laws, the current trend is in the direction of more gun rights.  The 1994 Omnibus Crime Bill included a ban on certain new rifles labeled assault rifles solely because of features of their appearance, and on new high-capacity magazines.  This law recently expired and was not renewed by Congress.  Also, Washington D.C.'s gun ban was struck down as unconstitutional by the U.S. Court of Appeals on March 9, 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20070309-102401-2730r.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Constitutional Debate==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Second Amendment]] reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most constitutional scholars agree that since the amendment refers to &amp;quot;the right of the People&amp;quot; instead of the right of the militia, it protects an individual right to own guns. The extent of that right has been debated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nra.org/ The National Rifle Association]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nrapublications.org/armed%20citizen/Index.asp Armed citizens defending themselves.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nick227</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&amp;diff=160504</id>
		<title>Gun control</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Gun_control&amp;diff=160504"/>
		<updated>2007-05-14T17:37:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nick227: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Gun control laws have been enacted at the federal, state, and local level with the intent of placing restrictions on the right of individual private citizens to own [[firearms]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A common use of firearms is to defend one's life, though accidental death of those who are attacking has occurred.  Gun control laws are often seen to conflict with the [[Second Amendment]] to the [[United States Constitution]], which recognizes the right to bear arms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Second Amendment reads: &amp;quot;A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Gun control''' is the regulation by governments of [[gun]] ownership and the right to carry, conceal, or use [[firearm]]s.  Such measures can range from a total prohibition on civilian ownership and possession of firearms and ammunition to specific restrictions on certain firearm features, &amp;quot;waiting periods&amp;quot; for gun purchases, licensing of gun owners, registration of firearms, etc.  Increased &amp;quot;gun control&amp;quot; is generally promoted by pacifists and [[liberals]] as a remedy to [[crime]].  In fact, whether or not guns are officially controlled by the government, criminals will commit crimes, and a black market will exist to provide them with firearms.  For instance, despite the prohibition of handgun ownership in the [[United Kingdom]], an island nation without any neighboring &amp;quot;gun culture&amp;quot; nations, handgun crime has been steadily increasing there for many years. As of 2005/06, the total deaths by shooting in the UK had increased to 50.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs07/hosb0207.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Comparably, the United States suffered 11,350 gun deaths in 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/05cius/data/table_01.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;However, it should be noted that the USA has a population approximately 5 times greater than the UK, &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0004997.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the number of murders by shooting is approximately 200 times higher.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;right to keep and bear arms&amp;quot; is a right guaranteed to the American citizen by the Bill of Rights through the virtue of a selective reading of said Bill. The phrase &amp;quot;a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state&amp;quot; precedes the statement, and most federal circuits [[cour]ts of appeals]] have held that this phrase requires that the &amp;quot;right to bear arms&amp;quot; relates to the collective rights of state militias, as opposed to the individual's rights to have any weapon desired.  Just recently, the Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit went against nine other circuits in holding that the Second Amendment constitutes an individual right.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/10/washington/10gun.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin, http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258067,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Overview==&lt;br /&gt;
The end effect of gun control laws is the reduction of gun crime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Gun control&amp;quot; is the use of legislation to place restrictions on the right to bear arms right. This can include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Restricting which persons can own firearms.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Restrictions on the number of firearms a person may own, or purchase during a given time period&lt;br /&gt;
* Requirements that privately owned firearms be registered with the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Bans on certain types of firearms; for example, &amp;quot;handguns&amp;quot; or assault rifles&lt;br /&gt;
* Restrictions on where firearms may be carried, for example into restaurants or post offices&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring a &amp;quot;background check&amp;quot; and/or a &amp;quot;waiting period&amp;quot; to purchase a firearm&lt;br /&gt;
* Restricting when and where firearms may be bought and sold, for example banning their sale through the mail&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring licenses or some other form of permission from the government to buy and/or sell a firearm&lt;br /&gt;
* Requiring some form of permission from the government to carry a firearm in public, either concealed or openly&lt;br /&gt;
* Laws granting special gun rights for some people, for example retired law enforcement officers, which are denied the rest of the public, which was used in several southern states.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Outright bans on carrying firearms in public&lt;br /&gt;
* Outright bans on private possession of firearms, though this has never occurred in the United States&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States the three primary federal gun control laws are:&lt;br /&gt;
* National Firearms Act (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* Gun Control Act (1968)&lt;br /&gt;
* Brady Bill (1993)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These laws have further been amended by other laws such as the Firearms Owners Protection Act (1986) and the Omnibus Crime Bill (1994).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Objections to gun control==&lt;br /&gt;
Studies by John Lott and others indicate that gun control causes higher crime rates&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.johnrlott.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  [[Washington, D.C.]] has one of the highest crime rates in America even though it completely bans private handguns &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/dccrime.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After decades of increasing gun control laws, the current trend is in the direction of more gun rights.  The 1994 Omnibus Crime Bill included a ban on certain new rifles labeled assault rifles solely because of features of their appearance, and on new high-capacity magazines.  This law recently expired and was not renewed by Congress.  Also, Washington D.C.'s gun ban was struck down as unconstitutional by the U.S. Court of Appeals on March 9, 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washtimes.com/metro/20070309-102401-2730r.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Constitutional Debate==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Second Amendment]] reads:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most constitutional scholars agree that since the amendment refers to &amp;quot;the right of the People&amp;quot; instead of the right of the militia, it protects an individual right to own guns. The extent of that right has been debated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nra.org/ The National Rifle Association]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nrapublications.org/armed%20citizen/Index.asp Armed citizens defending themselves.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Nick227</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>