<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Newt14</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Newt14"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Newt14"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T22:24:56Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Westboro_Baptist_Church&amp;diff=967254</id>
		<title>Westboro Baptist Church</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Westboro_Baptist_Church&amp;diff=967254"/>
		<updated>2012-03-09T04:09:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Newt14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:20001025 xnjdo FredGoreFiny.jpg|thumb|240px|right|Rev. [[Fred Phelps]] with [[Nobel Peace Prize]] winner [[Al Gore]] at a Westboro Baptist Church event.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Westboro Baptist Church''' (WBC) is a [[radical]], [[Christian]] church headed by pastor [[Fred Phelps]]. The church is located in [[Topeka]], [[Kansas]], and  receives most of its publicity from its infamous &amp;quot;God Hates Fags&amp;quot; protests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WBC is closely monitored by both the Anti-Defamation League and the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]], and is regarded by the latter as a hate group. While mainstream Christianity rejects [[homosexuality]] as sin, following [[God]]'s example, true Christians [[love]] the sinner. In contrast, WBC demonstrates no love for the sinner, and their attitude is considered to be one of hate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the name implies that the church is affiliated with other mainstream [[Baptist]] churches, the WBC is independent of mainstream Christianity. The church's members are almost entirely family members and are infamous for their protests and pickets at the funerals of soldiers who died in the line of duty, where they take the opportunity to denounce what they consider to be [[America]]'s acceptance of homosexuality. The name of their website reflects this.  Their antics are denounced across almost all spectra of political and religious thought.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their hatred, and seeking of publicity, goes beyond homosexuality.  They also protested the [[Pope]]'s visit, calling him the [[anti-Christ]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adl.org/special_reports/wbc/default.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Snyder v. Phelps==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011 the church's speech - that is, their picketing of funerals - was ruled as protected by the [[First Amendment]] in the case ''Snyder v. Phelps''. The Church, represented by daughter of the pastor Shirley Phelps, had picketed a Marine's funeral, and the Marine's father had sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The [[ACLU]] and [[NPR]], amongst others, had filed amicus briefs in favor of Phelps, while many Congressmen filed on behalf of Snyder. [[Chief Justice]] [[John Roberts]] wrote, &amp;quot;As a Nation we have chosen a different course—to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate. That choice requires that we shield West- boro from tort liability for its picketing in this case.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fred Phelps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{homosexualityb}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hate Groups]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Political Activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Newt14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Westboro_Baptist_Church&amp;diff=967253</id>
		<title>Westboro Baptist Church</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Westboro_Baptist_Church&amp;diff=967253"/>
		<updated>2012-03-09T04:08:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Newt14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:20001025 xnjdo FredGoreFiny.jpg|thumb|240px|right|Rev. [[Fred Phelps]] with [[Nobel Peace Prize]] winner [[Al Gore]] at a Westboro Baptist Church event.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Westboro Baptist Church''' (WBC) is a [[radical]],[[Christian]] church headed by pastor [[Fred Phelps]]. The church is located in [[Topeka]], [[Kansas]], and  receives most of its publicity from its infamous &amp;quot;God Hates Fags&amp;quot; protests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The WBC is closely monitored by both the Anti-Defamation League and the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]], and is regarded by the latter as a hate group. While mainstream Christianity rejects [[homosexuality]] as sin, following [[God]]'s example, true Christians [[love]] the sinner. In contrast, WBC demonstrates no love for the sinner, and their attitude is considered to be one of hate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the name implies that the church is affiliated with other mainstream [[Baptist]] churches, the WBC is independent of mainstream Christianity. The church's members are almost entirely family members and are infamous for their protests and pickets at the funerals of soldiers who died in the line of duty, where they take the opportunity to denounce what they consider to be [[America]]'s acceptance of homosexuality. The name of their website reflects this.  Their antics are denounced across almost all spectra of political and religious thought.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their hatred, and seeking of publicity, goes beyond homosexuality.  They also protested the [[Pope]]'s visit, calling him the [[anti-Christ]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adl.org/special_reports/wbc/default.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Snyder v. Phelps==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011 the church's speech - that is, their picketing of funerals - was ruled as protected by the [[First Amendment]] in the case ''Snyder v. Phelps''. The Church, represented by daughter of the pastor Shirley Phelps, had picketed a Marine's funeral, and the Marine's father had sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The [[ACLU]] and [[NPR]], amongst others, had filed amicus briefs in favor of Phelps, while many Congressmen filed on behalf of Snyder. [[Chief Justice]] [[John Roberts]] wrote, &amp;quot;As a Nation we have chosen a different course—to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate. That choice requires that we shield West- boro from tort liability for its picketing in this case.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fred Phelps]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{homosexualityb}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hate Groups]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Political Activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Newt14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=967252</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=967252"/>
		<updated>2012-03-09T04:05:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Newt14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:President Barack Obama.jpg|thumbnail|right|180px|President [[Barack Obama]] advocates the use of [[Keynesian economics|Keynesian economic concepts]] despite the fact that John Maynard Keynes was incompetent and a fraud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/fabian-john-maynard-keynes-the-stealthy-enemy-of-human-freedom/ John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-02-22/deathbed-of-keynesian-economics-will-be-in-u-k-matthew-lynn.html Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2008/01/keyness-jew-boy-quickie/220620/ Keynes's &amp;quot;Jew Boy&amp;quot; Quickie, The Atlantic]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Johnwaynegacyrosalynncarter.jpg|right|300px|thumbnail|[[Serial killer]] [[John Wayne Gacy]] was a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with First Lady [[Rosalynn Carter]] in 1978. In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, John Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view&amp;amp;current=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (not to be confused with a ''leftist''), is someone who represents or is in support of some form of liberalism. This often includes social progressivism. Particularly in the [[United States]], the term may also be associated with irreligious people, or those who otherwise disagree with moral or social standards held as traditional by American [[Christian|Christians]]. Some may be [[Christian]], but they are rarely immensely committed to Christianity. Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[welfare state]]-ist.  Liberalism has changed over the years and degenerated into a delusional (in the sense of economic views) and anti-traditional ideology.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] firmly believed in private sector unions, but vehemently opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties.  Yet today, decades later, [[Democrats]] and liberals are almost in cahoots with public sector unions, as they &amp;quot;donate&amp;quot; money to the reelection campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals currently use two clauses to try and expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause.  The general welfare clause mentions &amp;quot;promoting the general welfare&amp;quot;.  This to a liberal means taxing the rich out of existence and redistributing that money.  The commerce clause on the other hand is in the constitution and says that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign nations, between the states and with the indian tribes.  Since the days of FDR this clause has been interpreted very loosely and has resulted in the federal government vastly expanding its power.  The latest example is Obamacare.  In Obamacare, the liberals justify the individual mandate by saying it regulates commerce between the states.  This is clearly a stretched interpretation of the clause as there is a difference between regulating commerce and forcing citizens to participate in commerce that Congress can regulate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polling data over several decades has consistently shown that more Americans identify as conservative than as liberal, by a ratio of 2:1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Spending money on government programs (the significant economic problems in the [[Eurozone]] due to government debt will no doubt increasingly discredit this aspect of liberal ideology and make things more difficult for advocates of liberal economic ideologies)&lt;br /&gt;
* Government solving economic problems&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The belief that terrorism is not a huge threat, and that the only reason Muslim extremists hate us is because of bad foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Prohibition of teacher-led [[prayer]] in classrooms and school/state-sponsored religious events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Affirmative action&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity, pornography and violence in video games as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography.  These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-funded medical care, such as [[Obamacare]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of traditional [[gender roles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]] and homosexual adoption&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tax and spend]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for economic sector regulations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support and spreading of [[political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of non-syndicalist [[labor union|labor unions]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouraging promiscuity through sexual education (the teaching of safe sex) rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from premarital sex&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; and environmental organizations, for example [[Greenpeace]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to the integration of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Withholds support to the [[War on Terrorism]] and the [[War in Iraq]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tolerance of different ideas and lifestyles&lt;br /&gt;
* Do not support a laissez-faire capitalist economy and support regulation of business&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouragement of [[Global Warming|global warming alarmism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to current dictionaries and their own beliefs, a liberal is &amp;quot;a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=liberal&amp;amp;sub=Search+WordNet&amp;amp;o2=&amp;amp;o0=1&amp;amp;o7=&amp;amp;o5=&amp;amp;o1=1&amp;amp;o6=&amp;amp;o4=&amp;amp;o3=&amp;amp;h=00&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or &amp;quot;open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]] and [[Atheism and charity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ===&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] exposing the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his lack of charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism and bestiality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Peter-Singer.jpg|right|thumbnail|260px|The [[atheist]] philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of [[bestiality]] (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Atheism and bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. The [[atheist]] philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of bestiality (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]] (Princeton University is a very liberal school - see: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Singer was installed as the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at the University Center for Human Values at Princeton University in 1999 and in 2006 it was reported that he still worked part-time in that capacity. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2006, it was also reported that Singer worked part-time as Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne in the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics since 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Carter's ''[[First Things]]'' article entitled ''The Dangerous Mind'' declares concerning Peter  Singer declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Singer has spent a lifetime justifying the unjustifiable. He is the founding father of the [[Animal rights|animal liberation movement]] and advocates ending “the present speciesist bias against taking seriously the interests of nonhuman animals.” He is also a defender of killing the aged (if they have dementia), newborns (for almost any reason until they are two years old), necrophilia (assuming it’s consensual), and bestiality (also assuming it’s consensual).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 5, 2011, the British newspaper The Telegraph wrote an article which discussed how homosexuality &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; have emboldened individuals to ask for so called bestiality &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; (see: [[Homosexuality and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100108943/the-gay-rights-movement-has-emboldened-americas-bestiality-advocates/ The dark side of sexual freedom: American 'zoophiles' take on the language of equality - October 5, 2011 - The Telegraph]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010, the liberal state of [[Washington]] has the highest number of reported cases of bestiality in the United States even though it was merely the 13th most populous state according to the 2010 United States census. (for more information please see: [[Washington state and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pet-abuse.com/pages/cruelty_database/statistics/state_ranking.php?year=2010&amp;amp;search=go Pet Abuse -2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php 2010 United States Census data]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/new-poll-identifies-most-liberal-and-conservative-states/ 2011 Political map - CNN]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005, four legislators in the liberal state of [[Massachusetts]] tried to soften it bestiality laws.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Massachusetts bill to repeal fornication, adultery, and blasphemy, and to soften bestiality laws]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NBC Tower.jpg|thumbnail|200px|[[LifeSiteNews]] reported:&amp;quot;In 46 hours of programming, [[NBC]] contained only one reference to marital sex, but 11 references to non-marital sex and one reference to [[adultery]] were made. References to incest, pedophilia, partner swapping, prostitution, threesomes, transsexuals/transvestites, [[bestiality]], and necrophilia combined outnumbered references to sex in marriage on NBC by a ratio of 27 to 1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/aug/08080602 Study Finds TV Treats Marital Sex as Burdensome, Adultery as Positive]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Liberalism and bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible says that bestiality is a perversion and, under the [[Old Testament]] [[Pentateuch|Jewish Law]], punishable by death (Exodus 22:19, Leviticus 18:23, Leviticus 20:15 and Deuteronomy 27:21). The atheistic worldview does not lend itself to the establishment of morality within society and individuals (see: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and deception]]).  The atheistic worldview does not lend itself to the establishment of morality within society and individuals (see: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and deception]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study found that &amp;quot;Psychiatric patients were found to have a statistically significant higher prevalence rate (55%) of bestiality than the control groups (10% and 15% respectively).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1778686 A prevalence study of bestiality (zoophilia) in psychiatric in-patients, medical in-patients, and psychiatric staff - Int J Psychosom. 1991;38(1-4):45-7.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The atheist population [[Atheism and suicide|has a higher suicide rate]] and [[Atheism and marriageability|lower marriage rates]] than the general population (see: [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and marriageability]] and [[Atheism and health]]). In addition,  ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine made the observation that atheists tend to be quarrelsome, socially challenged men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/08/socially-autistic-atheist.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information please see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal American entertainment industry and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia on bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bestiality and Sweden|Liberal Sweden and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bestiality and Britain|Godless Britain and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Denmark, Sweden, evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Netherlands and bestiality|The liberal Netherlands and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Skeptic Skatje Myers' comments on bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin's ape-men experiments]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal.  A crowd at Occupy Wall Street was led to repeat various chants which included a chant involving bestiality and the incident was videotaped.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-10-greatest-moments-from-the-occupy-wall-street-protests-so-far/ The 10 Greatest Moments From The Occupy Wall Street Protests So Far]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is an excerpt of the chant:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Everything seems to be possible. [Crowd Parrot Chant] You can travel to the moon.  [CPC] You can become immortal [CPC] by biogenetics.  You can have sex with animals, or whatever. [CPC].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-10-greatest-moments-from-the-occupy-wall-street-protests-so-far/ The 10 Greatest Moments From The Occupy Wall Street Protests So Far]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith &amp;amp;mdash; it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America Today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smear merchants.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly liberal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three liberal tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: SIN. Liberals (1) '''s'''hift the subject, they (2) '''i'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''n'''ame call.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott Baker. [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[YouTube]]. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A&amp;amp; Herman Cain: &amp;quot;Stupid People Are Ruining America&amp;quot;], February 11, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals typically support a &amp;quot;mixed&amp;quot; economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== American liberalism, demographics and expected tipping point in the decline of American liberalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
See also:'' [[American atheism]] and [[Decline of atheism]] and [[Global atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] in traditional cultures and their influence on Western [[Christianity]] and the higher birth rate of [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]] and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book ''Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth?'' concerning America:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will to tip the balance in the [[Culture War|culture wars]] towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as abortion. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/03/question-evolution-campaign-is-reaching.html Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Infamous liberals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view&amp;amp;current=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gacy was also a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.|ANSWER - Act Now to Stop War and End Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CAIR|CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women|NOW - National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PETA|PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEIU|SEIU - Service Employees International Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scientific Illiteracy and Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Best_New_Conservative_Words#New_Liberal_Terms|New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Newt14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=967251</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=967251"/>
		<updated>2012-03-09T03:55:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Newt14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:President Barack Obama.jpg|thumbnail|right|180px|President [[Barack Obama]] advocates the use of [[Keynesian economics|Keynesian economic concepts]] despite the fact that John Maynard Keynes was incompetent and a fraud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/fabian-john-maynard-keynes-the-stealthy-enemy-of-human-freedom/ John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-02-22/deathbed-of-keynesian-economics-will-be-in-u-k-matthew-lynn.html Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2008/01/keyness-jew-boy-quickie/220620/ Keynes's &amp;quot;Jew Boy&amp;quot; Quickie, The Atlantic]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Johnwaynegacyrosalynncarter.jpg|right|300px|thumbnail|[[Serial killer]] [[John Wayne Gacy]] was a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with First Lady [[Rosalynn Carter]] in 1978. In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, John Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view&amp;amp;current=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (not to be confused with a ''leftist''), is someone who represents or is in support of some form of liberalism. This often includes social progressivism. Particularly in the [[United States]], the term may also be associated with irreligious people, or those who otherwise disagree with moral or social standards held as traditional by American [[Christian|Christians]]. Some may be [[Christian]], but they are rarely immensely committed to Christianity. Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[welfare state]]-ist.  Liberalism has changed over the years and degenerated into a delusional (in the sense of economic views) and anti-traditional ideology.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] firmly believed in private sector unions, but vehemently opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties.  Yet today, decades later, [[Democrats]] and liberals are almost in cahoots with public sector unions, as they &amp;quot;donate&amp;quot; money to the reelection campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals currently use two clauses to try and expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause.  The general welfare clause mentions &amp;quot;promoting the general welfare&amp;quot;.  This to a liberal means taxing the rich out of existence and redistributing that money.  The commerce clause on the other hand is in the constitution and says that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign nations, between the states and with the indian tribes.  Since the days of FDR this clause has been interpreted very loosely and has resulted in the federal government vastly expanding its power.  The latest example is Obamacare.  In Obamacare, the liberals justify the individual mandate by saying it regulates commerce between the states.  This is clearly a stretched interpretation of the clause as there is a difference between regulating commerce and forcing citizens to participate in commerce that Congress can regulate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polling data over several decades has consistently shown that more Americans identify as conservative than as liberal, by a ratio of 2:1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Spending money on government programs (the significant economic problems in the [[Eurozone]] due to government debt will no doubt increasingly discredit this aspect of liberal ideology and make things more difficult for advocates of liberal economic ideologies)&lt;br /&gt;
* Government solving economic problems&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The belief that terrorism is not a huge threat, and that the only reason Muslim extremists hate us is because of bad foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Prohibition of teacher-led [[prayer]] in classrooms and school/state-sponsored religious events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Affirmative action&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity, pornography and violence in video games as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography.  These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-funded medical care, such as [[Obamacare]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of traditional [[gender roles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]] and homosexual adoption&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tax and spend]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for economic sector regulations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support and spreading of [[political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of non-syndicalist [[labor union|labor unions]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouraging promiscuity through sexual education (the teaching of safe sex) rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from premarital sex&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; and environmental organizations, for example [[Greenpeace]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to the integration of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Withholds support to the [[War on Terrorism]] and the [[War in Iraq]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tolerance of different ideas and lifestyles&lt;br /&gt;
* Supports financially irresponsible policies&lt;br /&gt;
* Following policies which are proven to be incorrect&lt;br /&gt;
* Do not support a laissez-faire capitalist economy and support regulation of business&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouragement of [[Global Warming|global warming alarmism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to current dictionaries and their own beliefs, a liberal is &amp;quot;a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=liberal&amp;amp;sub=Search+WordNet&amp;amp;o2=&amp;amp;o0=1&amp;amp;o7=&amp;amp;o5=&amp;amp;o1=1&amp;amp;o6=&amp;amp;o4=&amp;amp;o3=&amp;amp;h=00&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or &amp;quot;open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]] and [[Atheism and charity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ===&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] exposing the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his lack of charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism and bestiality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Peter-Singer.jpg|right|thumbnail|260px|The [[atheist]] philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of [[bestiality]] (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Atheism and bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. The [[atheist]] philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of bestiality (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]] (Princeton University is a very liberal school - see: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Singer was installed as the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at the University Center for Human Values at Princeton University in 1999 and in 2006 it was reported that he still worked part-time in that capacity. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2006, it was also reported that Singer worked part-time as Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne in the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics since 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Carter's ''[[First Things]]'' article entitled ''The Dangerous Mind'' declares concerning Peter  Singer declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Singer has spent a lifetime justifying the unjustifiable. He is the founding father of the [[Animal rights|animal liberation movement]] and advocates ending “the present speciesist bias against taking seriously the interests of nonhuman animals.” He is also a defender of killing the aged (if they have dementia), newborns (for almost any reason until they are two years old), necrophilia (assuming it’s consensual), and bestiality (also assuming it’s consensual).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 5, 2011, the British newspaper The Telegraph wrote an article which discussed how homosexuality &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; have emboldened individuals to ask for so called bestiality &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; (see: [[Homosexuality and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100108943/the-gay-rights-movement-has-emboldened-americas-bestiality-advocates/ The dark side of sexual freedom: American 'zoophiles' take on the language of equality - October 5, 2011 - The Telegraph]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010, the liberal state of [[Washington]] has the highest number of reported cases of bestiality in the United States even though it was merely the 13th most populous state according to the 2010 United States census. (for more information please see: [[Washington state and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pet-abuse.com/pages/cruelty_database/statistics/state_ranking.php?year=2010&amp;amp;search=go Pet Abuse -2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php 2010 United States Census data]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/new-poll-identifies-most-liberal-and-conservative-states/ 2011 Political map - CNN]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005, four legislators in the liberal state of [[Massachusetts]] tried to soften it bestiality laws.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Massachusetts bill to repeal fornication, adultery, and blasphemy, and to soften bestiality laws]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NBC Tower.jpg|thumbnail|200px|[[LifeSiteNews]] reported:&amp;quot;In 46 hours of programming, [[NBC]] contained only one reference to marital sex, but 11 references to non-marital sex and one reference to [[adultery]] were made. References to incest, pedophilia, partner swapping, prostitution, threesomes, transsexuals/transvestites, [[bestiality]], and necrophilia combined outnumbered references to sex in marriage on NBC by a ratio of 27 to 1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/aug/08080602 Study Finds TV Treats Marital Sex as Burdensome, Adultery as Positive]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Liberalism and bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible says that bestiality is a perversion and, under the [[Old Testament]] [[Pentateuch|Jewish Law]], punishable by death (Exodus 22:19, Leviticus 18:23, Leviticus 20:15 and Deuteronomy 27:21). The atheistic worldview does not lend itself to the establishment of morality within society and individuals (see: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and deception]]).  The atheistic worldview does not lend itself to the establishment of morality within society and individuals (see: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and deception]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study found that &amp;quot;Psychiatric patients were found to have a statistically significant higher prevalence rate (55%) of bestiality than the control groups (10% and 15% respectively).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1778686 A prevalence study of bestiality (zoophilia) in psychiatric in-patients, medical in-patients, and psychiatric staff - Int J Psychosom. 1991;38(1-4):45-7.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The atheist population [[Atheism and suicide|has a higher suicide rate]] and [[Atheism and marriageability|lower marriage rates]] than the general population (see: [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and marriageability]] and [[Atheism and health]]). In addition,  ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine made the observation that atheists tend to be quarrelsome, socially challenged men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/08/socially-autistic-atheist.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information please see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal American entertainment industry and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia on bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bestiality and Sweden|Liberal Sweden and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bestiality and Britain|Godless Britain and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Denmark, Sweden, evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Netherlands and bestiality|The liberal Netherlands and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Skeptic Skatje Myers' comments on bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin's ape-men experiments]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal.  A crowd at Occupy Wall Street was led to repeat various chants which included a chant involving bestiality and the incident was videotaped.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-10-greatest-moments-from-the-occupy-wall-street-protests-so-far/ The 10 Greatest Moments From The Occupy Wall Street Protests So Far]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is an excerpt of the chant:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Everything seems to be possible. [Crowd Parrot Chant] You can travel to the moon.  [CPC] You can become immortal [CPC] by biogenetics.  You can have sex with animals, or whatever. [CPC].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-10-greatest-moments-from-the-occupy-wall-street-protests-so-far/ The 10 Greatest Moments From The Occupy Wall Street Protests So Far]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith &amp;amp;mdash; it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America Today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smear merchants.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly liberal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three liberal tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: SIN. Liberals (1) '''s'''hift the subject, they (2) '''i'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''n'''ame call.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott Baker. [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[YouTube]]. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A&amp;amp; Herman Cain: &amp;quot;Stupid People Are Ruining America&amp;quot;], February 11, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals typically support a &amp;quot;mixed&amp;quot; economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== American liberalism, demographics and expected tipping point in the decline of American liberalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
See also:'' [[American atheism]] and [[Decline of atheism]] and [[Global atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] in traditional cultures and their influence on Western [[Christianity]] and the higher birth rate of [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]] and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book ''Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth?'' concerning America:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will to tip the balance in the [[Culture War|culture wars]] towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as abortion. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/03/question-evolution-campaign-is-reaching.html Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Infamous liberals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view&amp;amp;current=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gacy was also a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.|ANSWER - Act Now to Stop War and End Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CAIR|CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women|NOW - National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PETA|PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEIU|SEIU - Service Employees International Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scientific Illiteracy and Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Best_New_Conservative_Words#New_Liberal_Terms|New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Newt14</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Buddhism&amp;diff=967250</id>
		<title>Buddhism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Buddhism&amp;diff=967250"/>
		<updated>2012-03-09T03:51:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Newt14: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Buddhism''' is a religious system whose followers seek liberation from suffering through adherence to the teachings of the Buddha [[Siddhartha Gautama]]. To Buddhists, sentient beings are trapped in an eternal cycle of death and rebirth (&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;samsara&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;), characterized by continual dissatisfaction or suffering (&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;dukkha&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;). Buddhism provides a practical set of teachings (the &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;dharma&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;) designed to help sentient beings achieve a state of freedom from dukkha. Buddhism teaches that individuals reincarnate involuntarily and repeatedly in the world of samsara, a cyclic process which ends for an individual when they attain Nirvana (Theravada) or Enlightenment (Mahayana), either in a human body or immediately upon death in their last involuntary cycle of samsara. Mahayana Buddhism holds, in addition, that the goal of Enlightenment is not merely release from one's own personal suffering in samsara, but also the release of all sentient beings, toward which an enlightened being or &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Buddha&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; is, by nature, committed to work through compassionate action. To this end, a Buddha may voluntarily reincarnate to help release all sentient beings from samsara.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Nara.jpg|thumb|200px|Great Buddha at [[Nara]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Founder==&lt;br /&gt;
Buddhism was founded by an [[India|Indian]] prince, [[Siddhartha Gautama]], who, after being sheltered from coming into contact with suffering due to disease, poverty and death until adulthood, finally observed the suffering of his people during his first walk outside the palace grounds.  After that he worked to discover the reason for suffering and pain. He studied a number of the disciplines of the day, seeking ultimate truth. After finding other approaches to understanding lacking, he went into meditation for 49 days, vowing not to move until he had attained enlightenment. After great personal struggle he achieved enlightenment, and began to teach the principles that are now associated with Buddhism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The philosophy has its roots in [[Hinduism]] and Vedic religion, to which Gautama belonged until the foundation of Buddhism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==View of God==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Mandala of Prajnaparamit.jpg|thumb|Mandala of Prajnaparamit, [[Tibet]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
Some Buddhist scriptures and some sects, like the Mahayana school, believe that gods exist,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wri.leaderu.com/orgs/probe/docs/buddhism.html Buddhism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.urbandharma.org/udharma3/budgod.html Do Buddhists Believe in God?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but do not consider that knowledge crucial to an individual's practice of Buddhist teachings since as incarnated beings, they too are bound to the wheel of Samsara and thus it is pointless to submit to them. The Buddha taught that we should not speculate about what we cannot know, and that speculation about [[God]] is pointless. Buddhists' priorities are release from suffering (by learning to cease striving after objects of desire and avoiding objects of discomfort) and direct experience of the true nature of reality. Many modern strains of Buddhism are [[atheist|atheistic]] in nature. They can be considered to be philosophies of life. Certain denominations, such as the Mahayana tradition, believe in [[Bodhisattvas]], or quasi-divine cosmic beings that seek to benefit others by remaining in a state of [[Samsara]], or eternal rebirth. These are prayed to, for advice and spiritual guidance, and often venerated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Teachings==&lt;br /&gt;
The highest ideal for a Buddhist is the state of Nirvana, or release from eternal rebirth, a state beyond conceptual thought. This descibes a state that is achieved through meditation and practice that is beyond the categories and conditioning that are a result of our education, experiences and the limitations of language. This state has been described by the Buddha as follows:  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;There is O monks, an Unborn, Unoriginated, Uncreated, Unformed.  Were there not, o monks, this Unborn, Unoriginated, Uncreated, Unformed, there would be no escape from the world of the born, originated, created, formed. ~ Udana, 80-81&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adherents claim that Buddhism is a very practical [[philosophy]], which teaches us to focus our attention on personal experience, to determine what is the cause of our discontents (&amp;quot;dukkha&amp;quot;) and to find a way to liberate ourselves from these, all the while expressing &amp;quot;metta&amp;quot;, which is universal, unconditional love, and &amp;quot;karuna&amp;quot;, which roughly translates to &amp;quot;compassion&amp;quot;, towards others.  These teachings are encapsulated in the [[Four Noble Truths]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.parami.org/buddhistanswers/four_noble_truths.htm Four Noble Truths]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Buddhism is commonly held to be a relatively peaceful religion, due to its less &amp;quot;absolutist&amp;quot; view of morality and the fluid nature of thought that encouraged not just acceptance of other faiths and ideas, but also examination of those ideas and, if necessary, applying them to one's life. This also allows people to follow Buddhism as a philosophy, and Islam, Judaism or Christianity as a faith, without contradicting any principles of either following.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://buddhism.about.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that the ideals of tolerance and introspection among the Buddhist faithful were often ignored by the leaders of Buddhist nations (much like the leaders of most other nations often disobeyed their own religions' fundamental laws in the interest of what was practical) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://buddhism.about.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and persecution of Christians in predominantly Buddhist nations does occur today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.persecution.org/whitepapers/vietnam-2002-03.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianpersecution.info/news/new-evidence-of-religious-persecution-in-vietnam-despite-release-prisoner/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://persecution.org/Countries/laos.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is important to note here that the beliefs of the populace and those of the leadership do not necessarily always coincide (ref. Israel under Roman control). It is important to note that only around 55% of Vietnam is Buddhist (see below), and that Buddhist monks took an active role in protesting the corrupt Diem regime and the Vietnam War.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of Buddhism's tenets might be considered to promote a 'liberal' lifestyle: vegetarianism, absolute pacifism, tolerance, lack of condemnation of homosexuality, agnosticism, etc. In particular, altered forms of Buddhism have been used in the atheistic American [[New Age]] movement. [[Liberals]], in keeping with [[relativism]], have been known to pick and choose which aspects of Buddhism to follow, while openly breaking other Buddhist teachings, like those forbidding drug use and sexual promiscuity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Eightfold Path==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Noble Eightfold Path]] is a teaching in Buddhism used to enlighten the individual, helping them to see the ultimate truth behind things like greed, suffering, and hatred.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right View - Is the way of looking at the world as it really is, to understand how it really works. &lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Intention - The purging of qualities the person knows to be wrong or immoral from themselves. Right View helps to identify which intentions are good and which are not. Exemplified by a commitment to nonviolence against other living beings.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Speech - Instructs the practitioner of Buddhism in how to speak to others. Emphasizes telling the truth, avoiding gossip and idle chatter, and speaking in a polite, pacifying manner. This path also scorns against hateful, divisive speech.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Action - This path instructs the practitioner in how to act in a morally upright manner, abstaining from violence, stealing, taking a life, and sexual misconduct.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Livelihood -  This instructs the practitioner to not engage in trades which, either directly or indirectly, result in harm to another living thing. These include Arms dealing, Human trade, working with animals raised to be slaughtered, or selling alcohol or drugs.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right effort - This is the teaching of ridding oneself of all harmful thought, words, and deeds, and prevent new ones from emerging.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Mindfulness - This teaches the practitioner to be focused on their own mind and aware or changes and phenomena affecting them, never to act or speak in error due to inattention or forgetfulness.&lt;br /&gt;
:* Right Concentration - This path teaches the practitioner how to meditate, calming the body and mind through measured breathing and repetition of a word or phrase. Using this practice allows the person to focus on what they have learned, and through dwelling on those teachings, gain knowledge of the world around them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Buddhism in Antiquity==&lt;br /&gt;
Buddhism has been an important part of the culture in many eastern countries, such as [[Cambodia]], [[Thailand]], and [[India]].  It has endured active persecution when conflicting with older beliefs such as [[Hinduism]], and led in many countries to the rise of Buddhist warrior-dissidents, as well as such interesting anomalies as ''shinshi'' (transliterated from the Khmer), a form of torture wherein strips of flesh are removed slowly from the forehead.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schlesinger, Robert.  ''Schlesinger's History of the East'', 2nd ed.  New York: Camport &amp;amp; Sons, 1986.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Branches of Buddhism==&lt;br /&gt;
Like many other religions of the world, Buddhism has developed into numerous branches and variation on the themes taught by the Buddha.  While it would be impossible to give a truly succinct description of every permutation, the schools of thought encompassing Buddhism are generally broken into three major divisions, discussed briefly below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Theravada'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therevaden Buddhism, sometimes derisively known as Hinyama (lesser vehicle) by some Mahayana Buddhist practitioners, is what can be described as the earliest advent of Buddhism and the closest to the original philosophy founded by the Buddha and is regarded by practitioners as the more conservative of the three divisions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Central to the Theravadan school of thought is the notion of Vibhajjavada&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://palikanon.com/english/wtb/u_v/vibhajja_vaada.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or Teaching of Analysis.  This notion holds that true insight for a student comes from a combination of critical reasoning and non-reliance on blind faith, though the teachings and writings of one's elders should be considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, Theravada teaches that enlightenment is not attainable in a single lifetime, nor should it be thought to be.  Instead, one must break free of their worldly fetters (hatred, lust, shame) before being reborn and continuing on the path to eventual enlightenment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theravadan Buddhism's main text can be considered the Pali Cannon, though a wealth of scripture, sutras and treatises have arisen and shall continue to be written as the philosophy continues to diversify.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Mahayana'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mahayana Buddhism, literally &amp;quot;Great Vehicle,&amp;quot; is one of the other main branches of Buddhism and is popular in East Asian countries such as [[China]], [[Korea]], [[Japan]] and [[Tibet]]. Whereas Theravada Buddhism focuses on induvidual enlightenment, Mahayana is Buddhism for the masses. Indeed, it is often called Buddhism for the masses. Furthermore, Mahayana holds bodhivisattvas in esteem. To put an analogy to it, bodhivisattvas are similar to saints, preachers, or even teachers in Christianity. Bodhivisattvas are enlightened ones who choose to remain in the cycle of samsara for the hope of helping others towards enlightenment. Gautama is perhaps the most famous of these bodhivisattvas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adherents of this branch of Buddhism believe in improving both their own consciousness and the world. They acknowledge that this approach would slow down the goal of overcoming suffering and have adopted &amp;quot;We should reach Nirvana as the last ones&amp;quot; as their bodhisattva vow.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cs.ru.nl/~henk/BP/bp1.html#SECTION00022000000000000000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Buddhism Today==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:China B.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
Buddhism is currently the majority religion in the following states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Country'''&lt;br /&gt;
|'''Percent'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thailand&lt;br /&gt;
|95% &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cambodia&lt;br /&gt;
|90 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Myanmar&lt;br /&gt;
|88&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bhutan&lt;br /&gt;
|75 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sri Lanka&lt;br /&gt;
|70 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Tibet*&lt;br /&gt;
|65 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Laos&lt;br /&gt;
|60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Vietnam&lt;br /&gt;
|55 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Japan**&lt;br /&gt;
|50&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; [[China]]: Is the country with the most Buddhists, with an estimated 100 million adherents. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; Tibet is an estimate, as there has never been a reliable survey. Furthermore, it is debatable whether Tibet should be considered an independent nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;**&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; [[Japan]] is an &amp;quot;odd&amp;quot; case, as surveys of adherence are conducted rather differently. Firstly it is debatable at what point various Japanese beliefs shift from being traditions to being religions. This is indicated by the fact that &amp;quot;85% of Japanese claim Buddhism as their preferred religion&amp;quot;, yet &amp;quot;75% percent claim to practice and believe in no religion&amp;quot; -a more accurate estimate may be 20%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_buddhist.html The Largest Buddhist Communities]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Obon.jpg|thumb|Obon remains one of the most important Buddhist observances]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Obon Festival is one of Japan’s oldest Buddhist celebrations; it marks the time that it’s believed the spirits of dead ancestors return to the Earth. The gathering included the Bon Odori dance, which remembers Japanese ancestors by imitating motions of picking cherries and mining coal. [http://www.culturesdiary.com/]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kamakura]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nara]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity in Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://wri.leaderu.com/wri-table2/buddhism.html#intro Buddhism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.accesstoinsight.org/ Access to Insight: Readings in Theravada Buddhism]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.kalachakranet.org/buddhism/history_japanese_buddhism.htm History of Japanese Buddhism]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Further reading ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Buddhism1.jpg|thumb|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Chodron, Thubten. ''Buddhism for Beginners'' (2001) [http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-Beginners-Thubten-Chodron/dp/1559391537/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1262317083&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Harding, John S. et al, eds. ''Wild Geese: Buddhism in Canada'' (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
* Landaw, Jonathan, and Stephan Bodian. ''Buddhism For Dummies'' (2002) [http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-Dummies-Religion-Spirituality/dp/0764553593/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1262317083&amp;amp;sr=1-5 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rahula, Walpola.  ''What the Buddha Taught: Revised and Expanded Edition with Texts from Suttas and Dhammapada''.  Grove, 1994.&lt;br /&gt;
*  Rapaport, Al,  and Brian Hotchkiss. ''Buddhism in America'' (1998) [http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-America-Al-Rapaport/dp/0804831521/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1262316921&amp;amp;sr=1-10 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Seager, Richard Hughes. ''Buddhism in America'' (2000) [http://www.amazon.com/Buddhism-America-Richard-Hughes-Seager/dp/0231108699/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1262316921&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Buddhism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dharmic Religions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Newt14</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>