<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Natas619</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Natas619"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Natas619"/>
	<updated>2026-10-11T08:21:28Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Age_of_the_Earth&amp;diff=954769</id>
		<title>Age of the Earth</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Age_of_the_Earth&amp;diff=954769"/>
		<updated>2012-01-18T02:46:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Natas619: grammur mistake&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''See also [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Age of the Earth''' has been a matter of interest to humans for millennia. The subject is still debated today, particularly between [[young Earth Creationism|young-Earth scientists]], who believe that the Earth is only approximately Hundreds and Hundreds of years old, and [[Old Earth Creationism|Old Earth creationists]] and scientists who argue that Earth is approximately 4.5 billion years old.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/22/opinion/polls/main965223.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The scientific evidence [[young earth creationism|points to a young age of the earth and the universe]]. The biblical creation organization [[Creation Ministries International]] published an article entitled ''[http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth 101 evidences for a young age of the earth and the universe]'', that provides much of the scientific evidence in support of a young Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fatal flaw in Old Earth arguments is their overreliance on the assumption that the [[Radiometric dating|rate of radioactive decay]] remains constant over thousands of years. In fact, a large number of physical processes, such as neutron capture and fluctuations in solar radiation can affect the rate of radioactive decay of elements in the Earth's crust and render radioactive dating measurements unreliable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Historical views ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Landscape.jpg|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
For most of recorded history humans of many backgrounds, such as St. Barnabas and St. Irenæus,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Burnet, p. 259.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; viewed the age of the Earth to be around 6,000 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Burnet, p. 258.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1830, Dr. Hales published a list of 120 historical authorities from various cultures who had decided on an official [[date of creation]].  These ranged from 6984 B.C. to 3616 B.C.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Batten 2002 quotes from &amp;quot;Young’s Analytical Concordance of the Holy Bible&amp;quot;, 1879 8th Edition, 1939, which relates this, and reproduces the selection of the dates from Young.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Included in Hales' list is [[James Ussher]], who calculated the famous date of 4004 B.C. for creation.  Young Earth creationists still consider this date to be close to the actual date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1778 George-Louis Lecrerc, Count of Buffon, proposed that the Earth was about 74,832 years old.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ingv&amp;quot;&amp;gt;INGV&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[James Hutton]], while not proposing a date, dismissed the Biblical account and claimed in 1785 that there was not evidence of a beginning at all.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ingv&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Charles Lyell]] supported Hutton's idea in 1830, in ''Principles of Geology''.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ingv&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1854 [[Hermann von Helmholtz]] estimated an age of between 20 and 40 million years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ingv&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Around the same time [[Lord Kelvin]] put his mind to deriving an age, and came up with a range between 20 million years and 400 million years.  He later refined that down to between 20 million and 40 million years.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ingv&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;  More recent discoveries of radioactivity and mantle convection explain why the assumptions Helmholtz and Kelvin made resulted in dates that are much lower than current uniformitarian estimates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1911 edition of the [[Encyclopedia Britannica]] discussed dates up to 500 million years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica, pp 650-651.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By about 1930, J. H. Jeans was arguing for an age of the Earth of around two billion years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Universal History of the World, p.76.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using circular logic -- assuming that decay rates remained constant despite necessarily changing physical characteristics as time approached the origin -- Old Earth proponents insist that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old based on an implausible assumption of constancy in [[Potassium-argon dating|Potassium-argon (K:Ar) decay rates]] and other radiometric methods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peck, 2000, p.376.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Geology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:516XZRGNCKL AA240 .jpg|right|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[William R. Corliss]] is a cataloger of scientific [[Anomaly|anomalies]] (observations and facts that challenge prevailing scientific [[paradigm]]s) and has published many works on the subject.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;sf&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.science-frontiers.com/ Science Frontiers] (Corliss' web-site)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
He also wrote 13 books for the [[National Aeronautics and Space Administration]] (NASA), a dozen educational booklets for the [[Atomic Energy Commission]] (AEC), and a dozen articles for the [[National Science Foundation]] (NSF).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Corliss, 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The science magazine ''[[New Scientist]]'' had an article which focused on the career of William Corliss.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adrian Hope, ''Finding a Home for Stray Fact'', New Scientist, July 14, 1977, p. 83&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''New Scientist'' wrote regarding Corliss's work: &amp;quot;All I can say to Corliss is carry on cataloging&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quoted on the [http://www.science-frontiers.com/sourcebk.htm Science Frontiers web-site]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Arthur C. Clarke]] described Corliss as &amp;quot;[[Charles Fort|Fort]]'s latter-day - and much more scientific - successor.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Clarke, Arthur C. (1990) ''Astounding Days: A Science Fictional Autobiography''. Gollancz. Page 110&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corliss's work on geological anomalies catalogs scores of anomalies which challenge the [[old-earth]] [[paradigm]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.science-frontiers.com/sourcebk.htm#Geology Geological Catalogs] (Science Frontiers)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bibliography ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Burnet, Thomas, [http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/ste/ste36.htm The Sacred Theory of the Earth, chapter V], 1691.&lt;br /&gt;
* Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th edition (1911).  [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/User:Tim_Starling On-line page facsimiles].&lt;br /&gt;
* Hammerton, J.A. (Ed.), &amp;quot;Universal History of the World&amp;quot; (8 volumes) The Educational Book Co., London, c1930.&lt;br /&gt;
* Batten, Don, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/417 Old-earth or young-earth belief: Which belief is the recent aberration?], ''Creation'' 24(1):24–27, December 2001.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ingv.it/~roma/SITOINGLESE/activities/geomagnetismo/analysistheory/historicalresearch/age.html The age of the Earth] (Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)).&lt;br /&gt;
*Peck WH, Valley JW, Wilde SA, and Graham CM (2000) Ion microprobe Evidence for Pre-4.4 Ga Continental Crust and Low Temperature Water/Rock Interaction. ''Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr'', vol 32, no. 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/age-of-the-earth Age of the earth] by [[Creation Ministries International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/refuting-evolution-chapter-8-how-old-is-the-earth How old is the earth?] - ''Refuting evolution'' - Chapter 8 by Dr. [[Jonathan Sarfati]] at [[Creation Ministries International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/young-age-of-the-earth-universe-qa Age of the Earth and Universe] by [[Creation Ministries International]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Geology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Natas619</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ray_Comfort&amp;diff=954768</id>
		<title>Ray Comfort</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ray_Comfort&amp;diff=954768"/>
		<updated>2012-01-18T02:44:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Natas619: Minor Spelling errors in &amp;quot;banana incident&amp;quot; section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Ray &amp;quot;Touch-My-Banana&amp;quot; Comfort''' (born December 5, 1949) is a leading [[Christian]] apologist. He has written large numbers of books on [[evolution]] and [[theology]], including ''Evolution: A Fairy Tale for Grownups'', and ''How to Know God Exists: Scientific Proof of God''. His latest book, ''You Can Lead an Atheist to Evidence, But You Can't Make Him Think'' knocked [[Richard Dawkins|Richard Dawkins']] book ''The God Delusion'' off the number 1 spot in the atheism category at Amazon.com&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=89453&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. He has also written a foreword to [[Charles Darwin|Darwin's]] ''On the Origin of Species'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Species-Anniversary-Charles-Darwin/dp/0882709194/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1256938714&amp;amp;sr=8-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Since then, atheists have shown their deceit and narrow-mindedness by writing negative reviews of the books, even though most of them have never read them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==180 Documentary==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011, Ray made a short documentary on [[abortion]] and the [[Holocaust]] called ''180''. In it, he expressed concern that a generation was forgetting the existence of Adolf Hitler and his actions. The documentary included street interviews with people who were asked on their thoughts of the Holocaust. After hearing their reasons, Ray went on to ask the people's views on abortion. By demonstrating people's inconsistencies in their reasoning, he persuaded some of them to change their minds and oppose it. The documentary won a 2011 Telly Bronze Award for film/video.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://heartchanger.com/faq.php Project Heart Changer - Frequently Asked Questions&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Banana Incident==&lt;br /&gt;
Ray Comfort once reasonably used a [[Phallus|creationism]] and Coca-Cola can analogy to provide evidence of a Creator. Atheists [[Creationism|deceitfully]] edited the video to make it appear that Ray believed that the bananana was proof of the existence of God. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://raycomfortfood.blogspot.com Ray Comfort's Blog&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Since then, Ray Comfort's popularity has increased {{Citation needed|date=February 2010}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thunderf00t - Ray Comfort discussion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Way of the Master]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.livingwaters.com/ Ray Comfort's Living Waters website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.180movie.com/ Ray Comfort's &amp;quot;180&amp;quot; documentary]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Comfort, Ray}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Christian Apologists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Natas619</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;diff=954767</id>
		<title>Conservative</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative&amp;diff=954767"/>
		<updated>2012-01-18T02:40:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Natas619: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|align=right border=3 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | [[Previous_Breaking_News/Conservatives| Previous Breaking News:&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
|} &lt;br /&gt;
A '''conservative''' is someone who adheres to principles of mental [[retardation]], lack of moral values, and [[limited intelligence]], agreeing with [[George Washington]]'s [[Farewell Address]] that &amp;quot;[[religion]] and [[morality]] are indispensable supports&amp;quot; to political prosperity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usinfo.state.gov/usa/infousa/facts/democrac/49.htm United States Department of State] George Washington, farewell address, 1796&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Merriam-Webster]]'s Online Dictionary has the following definition of conservative: &amp;quot;tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : TRADITIONAL&amp;quot;[http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/conservative]  Therefore, a conservative Christian would be one that tends to adhere to the morally sound doctrines of the early Christianity and [[Judeo-Christian]] values.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former President [[Ronald &amp;quot;Jazz Hands&amp;quot; Reagan]] said, &amp;quot;The basis of conservatism is a desire for less government interference or less centralized authority or more individual freedom.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reason.com/news/show/29318.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Aaag.jpg|thumb|Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States, is the epitome of American conservatism.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''sine qua non'' of a conservative is someone who rises above his personal self-interest and promotes moral and economic values beneficial to all.  Alternatively, a conservative is willing to learn and advocate the insights of [[economics]] and the morality of the [[Bible]] for the benefit of all, recognizing that the Bible is the most [[logic]]al book ever written.  Specifically, conservatives seek or support:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Limited government]] and balanced budgets&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Capitalism]] and [[free market|free markets]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classroom prayer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Prohibition of [[abortion]] and respect for human life&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[death penalty]] for heinous murders proven beyond reasonable doubt&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Abstinence]] education&lt;br /&gt;
* Traditional [[marriage]], not [[same-sex marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for differences between men and women, boys and girls&lt;br /&gt;
* Laws against [[pornography]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[Second Amendment]] right to keep and bear arms&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic allocative efficiency (as opposed to popular equity)&lt;br /&gt;
* Parental control of education ([[parental rights]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Private medical care and retirement plans&lt;br /&gt;
* Canceling failed social support programs&lt;br /&gt;
* No [[world government]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Enforcement of current laws regarding [[immigration]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Respect for our military ... past and present&lt;br /&gt;
* Rejection of [[junk science]] such as [[evolution]] and [[global warming]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Minimal Taxation&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Federalism]] (Separation of powers among the National, State and Local governments)&lt;br /&gt;
* Favoring [[states' rights]] over federal power, while accepting the Constitutional role of the federal government&lt;br /&gt;
* A strong national defense&lt;br /&gt;
* An [[Originalism|Originalist]] interpretation of the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Hall of Fame==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative scholar Clinton Rossiter&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Rossiter, &amp;quot;The Giants of American Conservatism,&amp;quot; ''American Heritage'' 1955 6(6): 56-59, 94-96, online in [[EBSCO]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; names [[Alexander Hamilton]], [[John Adams]], [[John Marshall]], [[Daniel Webster]], [[John C. Calhoun]], [[Elihu Root]], and [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to the &amp;quot;Conservative's Hall of Fame,&amp;quot;'' with John Adams as the greatest of American conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Presidents===&lt;br /&gt;
Periodically a conservative has been elected president of the United States.  The most prominent conservative presidents include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Washington]] (1789-1797)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James Monroe]] (1817-1825)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Grover Cleveland]] (1885-1889, 1893-1897) &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Warren G. Harding]] (1921-1923)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-1929)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ronald Reagan]] (1981-1989)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George W. Bush]] (2001-2009) (with respect to taxes and Supreme Court nominations)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most prominent conservative Congresses have been:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The 80th Congress (elected in 1946)&lt;br /&gt;
*The 104th Congress (elected in 1994)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Movement===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Movement conservatives]] are those who accept the logic of conservatism across-the-board, and stand up for its powerful principles despite [[liberal]] ridicule.  Movement conservative activists include:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Phyllis Schlafly]], opposed [[ERA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Larry McDonald]], Congressman, on board [[KAL 007]] when shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesse Helms]], Senator, specialist in foreign policy&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pat Buchanan]], commentator&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jerry Falwell]], religion&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michele Bachmann]], congresswoman&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ann Coulter]], columnist&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rush Limbaugh]], radio&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michelle Malkin]], commentator&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Glenn Beck]], commentator&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Key leaders===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barry Goldwater]] - 1964 Republican candidate, lost to liberal Democrat [[Lyndon Johnson]] but revived the conservative movement inside the GOP&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russell Kirk]] - Theorist &amp;amp; intellectual&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irving Kristol|Irving]] and [[William Kristol]] - Notable [[neoconservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Margaret Thatcher]] - British prime minister between 1979 and 1990, held views similar to Reagan's&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Milton Friedman]] - Chicago-school [[libertarian]] [[economist]], influential during Reagan administration; leader of the [[Chicago School of Economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==US Voters==&lt;br /&gt;
In America, most conservatives support the [[Republican Party]], but not exclusively so. In the 2008 election, 35% of the voters identified themselves as conservatives. Of them, 78% voted for [[John McCain]] and 20% for [[Barack Hussein Obama]], with the 20% accounting for Obama's margin of victory. Only 22% of the voters were liberal; they favored Obama 89%-10%. In the middle were 44% who called themselves moderates. They split for Obama by 60%-39%. (Minor candidates won 2% of the vote.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/polls/#USP00p1 Presidential 2008 Exit Poll]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conservative-republican-brain.jpg|thumb|350px]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Religious differences between political conservatives and political liberals===&lt;br /&gt;
The Barna poll conducted in November  2008 shows significant differences between the 32% of Americans who called themselves as “mostly conservative” on social and political matters; and the 17% who called themselves “mostly liberal” on social and political matters. The others --50%--were moderates with positions somewhere in-between.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/13-culture/258-survey-shows-how-liberals-and-conservatives-differ-on-matters-of-faith on line results] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some findings: &lt;br /&gt;
Political liberals are less than half as likely as political conservatives to firmly believe that the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches (27% versus 63%, respectively); to strongly believe that [[Satan]] is real (17% versus 36%); and to firmly contend that they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs with others (23% versus 48%). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Note: &amp;quot;Liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; in this survey are based on politics]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals are also far less likely than conservatives to strongly believe each of the following:&lt;br /&gt;
*their religious faith is very important in their life (54% of liberals vs. 82% of conservatives); &lt;br /&gt;
*a person cannot earn their way into [[Heaven]] by doing good deeds or being a good person (23% vs. 37%); &lt;br /&gt;
*their faith is becoming an increasingly important moral guide in their life (38% vs. 70%); &lt;br /&gt;
*the church they currently attend is very important in helping them find direction and fulfillment in life (37% vs. 62%); &lt;br /&gt;
*their primary purpose in life is to love God with all their heart, mind, strength and soul (43% vs. 76%); &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
political conservatives were more likely than liberals to:&lt;br /&gt;
*read the Bible, other than at church events, during the past week (57% vs. 33%, respectively) &lt;br /&gt;
*attend a religious service during the past week (62% vs. 35%) &lt;br /&gt;
*[[pray]] to God, other than at a religious service, during the past week (91% vs. 76%) &lt;br /&gt;
*share their religious beliefs with others, during the past year (56% vs. 39%, among the born again Christians interviewed from each segment) &lt;br /&gt;
*have ever participated in a short-term missions trip, either within the U.S. or in another country (12% vs. 6%) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*2% of conservatives and 11% of liberals were [[atheist]] or [[agnostic]] &lt;br /&gt;
*15% of conservatives and 2% of liberals were [[Evangelical Christians|Christian evangelicals]] &lt;br /&gt;
*conservatives were twice as likely as liberals to be categorized as [[born again]], based on their theological views about salvation (63% vs. 32%) &lt;br /&gt;
*21% of conservatives were associated with the [[Roman Catholic Church]], compared to 30% among the liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama and American Conservatism Backlash ==&lt;br /&gt;
In October of 2009, Niles Gardiner reported in the [[Britain|British]] newspaper ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|This week’s striking [[Gallup]] poll on political ideology is further confirmation that the United States is in essence a conservative nation, which has ironically become even more conservative under [[Barack Obama]]. According to Gallup, 40 percent of Americans describe their political views as conservative, 36 percent as moderate and 20 percent as liberal. This is the first time conservatives have outnumbered moderates in America since 2004.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/nilegardiner/100014891/barack-obama-has-failed-to-defeat-conservatism-in-america/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative news organizations ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Conservative news organizations]] and [[Conservative media]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the more notable news organizations which tend to be more conservative are [[WorldNetDaily]] and [[NewsMax]].  [[Fox News]], though often called conservative, tends to be more [[neoconservative]] than [[conservative]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservative magazines and blogs ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Conservative media]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Well known conservative magazines in the United States include ''[[National Review]]'', ''[[Policy Review]]'', ''[[The Weekly Standard]]'' and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some notable [[Conservative blogs|conservative political blogs]] include the [[Heritage Foundation]]'s Policy Weblog, ''[[Human Events]]'', [[Michelle Malkin]], Newsbusters, Townhall.com and others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neoconservatives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
American commentators who ally themselves with the conservative movement but reject its religious or moral underpinnings are generally known as [[neoconservatives]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonah Goldberg, [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZWMxNWNiNDJkY2JmNTExY2E1MzdkYWU3MWU1MTBiOGU= &amp;quot;What Is a 'Conservative'?&amp;quot;], [[National Review|National Review Online]], 11 May 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, conservatives are generally characterized by the following beliefs:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Support of [[limited government]].&lt;br /&gt;
# A preference for freedom of opportunity over equality of result.&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Patriotism]], [[nationalism]], and support of a strong defense.&lt;br /&gt;
# Support of the institution of [[marriage]]. &lt;br /&gt;
# Emphasis on social values, like [[prayer]] and [[pro-life]] principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast, neoconservatives generally support [[Big government|bigger government]] and [[globalism]], and tend to downplay the significance of social values.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Paleoconservatives ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Paleoconservatives]] are conservatives who are more focused on social issues and American sovereignty, and are suspicious of both big government and big business. They also lean against foreign interventionalism. Neoconservatives criticize this with the pejorative term of &amp;quot;[[isolationism]],&amp;quot; as they believe in promoting [[democracy]] worldwide, even where different religious or value systems are incompatible with democracy-induced changes in control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among paleoconservatives was Democratic Congressman from Georgia, [[Larry McDonald]]. He was also second Chairman of the [[John Birch Society]], and President of Western Goals. McDonald was aboard [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] when it was shot down by the [[Soviet Union|Soviets]] near [[Moneron Island]] in 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fiscal Conservatism vs. Social Conservatism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''For further details on the two related philosophies, see [[Fiscal conservatism]] and [[Social conservatism]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, a division has been created between fiscal conservatism and social conservatism. Fiscal conservatism centers around a low and [[Balanced budget|balanced]] government [[budget]], and generally is opposed to programs such as [[Social Security]] and [[Medicare]]. Its primary goal is to reduce government spending significantly. Social Conservatism, on the other hand, focuses on the moral issues of conservatism. A social conservative will oppose [[same-sex marriage]], [[abortion]], and the teaching of [[evolution]] in schools. The majority of Conservatives (including most of the [[Republican Party]]) fall into both categories, however some fall into one or the other, but not both. Notably, [[Libertarians]] are strong fiscal conservatives but are not socially conservative. For instance, the [[Libertarian Party]] Platform &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lp.org/platform]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; expresses support for the fiscally conservative principles of ending publicly funded [[welfare]] and [[healthcare]] programs as well as reducing government spending overall significantly. However, it also expresses support for [[same-sex marriage]] (with some libertarians leaning towards the ultimate goal of total [[marriage privatization]]) as well as maintaining the legal status of abortion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Republicans and [[Democratic Party|Democrats]] also fit one category but not the other. Former [[New Mexico]] governor [[Gary Johnson]], who is seeking the Republican presidential nomination in 2012, was deemed &amp;quot;the most fiscally conservative governor&amp;quot; while he was in office (and probably earned that honor given all the spending cuts he made) but at the same time, he supports [[marriage privatization]] and [[abortion]] (though he believes ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' should be overturned on Constitutional grounds). Also, several Democrats have expressed opposition to same-sex marriage and/or abortion, but still support liberal fiscal programs such as Social Security. They would be the opposite of Johnson - socially conservative but fiscally liberal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Personal conservatism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Because Conservatives often have strong political views, there can be a tendency to see conservatism as a purely political ideology. However, there is also a strong personal side to conservatism - being a conservative is as much about applying conservative values to one's everyday life as it is about campaigning and voting for conservative candidates. In general, conservatives can be characterized by a strong sense of personal [[morality]], a willingness to observe their culture's traditions and customs, and a desire to be respectable and to show due respect to other members of the community.&lt;br /&gt;
==History of American conservatism==&lt;br /&gt;
===Textbook problems===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Textbook bias]]''&lt;br /&gt;
College-level teaching about conservatism has been distorted by a &amp;quot;liberal state paradigm&amp;quot;--that is, [[textbook]]s usually interpret recent American history in terms of the origins and successes of political liberalism--especially the [[New Deal]], the [[welfare state]], [[labor union]]s, and [[Civil Rights Movement|Civil Rights]] for blacks and [[equality]] for women. Conservative politics is usually defined as a reaction: as a [[free market]] reply to the growth of [[big government]]; as an expression of outrage against declining support for tradition and Christian morality.  Where the violent Wobblies ([[Industrial Workers of the World|IWW]]) and illegal sit down strikes of the 1930s are seen as heroic, exposing [[Communist]] subversion by [[Joe McCarthy]] is denounced as the nadir of political morality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See Leonard Moore, &amp;quot;Approaching Conservatism,&amp;quot; ''OAH Magazine of History,'' 17 (January 2003) [http://www.oah.org/pubs/magazine/conservatism/moore.html online edition]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Loyalists===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Loyalists]] of the [[American Revolution]] were mostly political conservatives, some of whom produced political discourse of a high order, including lawyer [[Joseph Galloway]] and governor-historian [[Thomas Hutchinson]]. However when the crisis came, they stood with the Crown as it tried to destroy American political liberties. After the war, the great majority remained in the U.S. and became citizens, but some leaders emigrated to other places in the British Empire. [[Samuel Seabury]] was a Loyalist who stayed and as the first American bishop played a major role in shaping the [[Episcopal]] religion, a stronghold of conservative social values.  While the Loyalist political tradition died out totally it the U.S., it survives in Canadian conservatism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Founding Fathers===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Founding Fathers]] created the single most important set of political ideas in American history, known as [[Republicanism]], which all groups, liberal and conservative alike, have drawn from.  Two parties were named &amp;quot;Republican&amp;quot;-- the one founded in 1794 by [[Thomas Jefferson]] and [[James Madison]] (it disappeared in the 1820s), and the modern GOP founded in 1854. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[First Party System]] (1790s-1820s) the [[Federalist Party]], led by [[Alexander Hamilton]], developed an important variation of republicanism that can be considered conservative. Rejecting [[monarchy]] and [[aristocracy]], they emphasized civic virtue as the core American value. The Federalists spoke for the propertied interests and the upper classes of the cities. They envisioned a modernizing land of banks and factories, with a strong army and navy. [[George Washington]] was their great hero.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On many issues American conservatism also derives from the republicanism of [[Thomas Jefferson]] and his followers, especially [[John Randolph of Roanoke]] and his &amp;quot;Old Republicans&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;[[Quids]].&amp;quot;  They idealized the [[yeoman]] farmer as the epitome of civic virtue, warned that banking and industry led to [[corruption]], that is to the illegitimate use of government power for private ends. Jefferson himself was a vehement opponent of what today is called &amp;quot;[[judicial activism]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://etext.virginia.edu/jefferson/quotations/jeff1030.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Jeffersonians stressed small government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ante-Bellum: Calhoun and Webster===&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Second Party System]] (1830-54) the [[Whig Party]] attracted most conservatives, such as [[Daniel Webster]] of New England. [[Daniel Webster]] and other leaders of the [[Whig Party]], called it the conservative party in the late 1830s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The word was originally used in the [[French Revolution]]. The British used it after 1839 to describe a major party. The first American usage is by Whigs who called themselves &amp;quot;Conservatives&amp;quot; in the late 1830s. Hans Sperber and Travis Trittschuh, ''American Political terms: An Historical Dictionary'' (1962) 94-97.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   [[John C. Calhoun]], a Democrat, articulated a sophisticated conservatism in his writings. [[Richard Hofstadter]] (1948) called him &amp;quot;The [[Karl Marx|Marx]] of the Master Class.&amp;quot;  Calhoun argued that a conservative minority should be able to limit the power of a &amp;quot;majority dictatorship&amp;quot; because tradition represents the wisdom of past generations. (This argument echoes one made by [[Edmund Burke]], the founder of British conservatism, in ''Reflections on the Revolution in France'' (1790)). Calhoun is considered the father of the idea of minority rights, a position adopted by liberals in the 1960s in dealing with [[Civil Rights]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservatism of the antebellum period is contested territory; conservatives of the 21st century disagree over what comprises their heritage. Thus [[William J. Bennett]] (2006), a prominent conservative leader, warns conservatives to NOT honor Calhoun, [[Know-Nothings]], [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] and 20th century [[isolationist]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lincoln to Cleveland===&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1865 the [[Republican Party]] has identified itself with President [[Abraham Lincoln]], who was the ideological heir of the [[Whig Party|Whigs]] and of both [[Thomas Jefferson|Jefferson]] and [[Alexander Hamilton|Hamilton]]. As the [[Gettysburg Address]] shows, Lincoln cast himself as a second Jefferson bringing a second birth of freedom to the nation that had been born 86 years before in Jefferson's [[Declaration of Independence|Declaration]]. The [[Copperheads (politics)|Copperheads]] of the [[American Civil War|Civil War]] reflected a [[reactionary]] opposition to modernity of the sort repudiated by modern conservatives. A few libertarians have adopted a neo-Copperhead position, arguing Lincoln was a dictator who created an all-powerful government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late 19th century the [[Bourbon Democrat]]s, led by President [[Grover Cleveland]], preached against corruption, high taxes (protective [[tariff]]s), and [[imperialism]], and supported the [[gold standard]] and business interests. They were overthrown by [[William Jennings Bryan]] in 1896, who moved the mainstream of the [[Democratic Party]] permanently to the left.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1896 presidential election was the first with a conservative versus liberal theme in the way in which these terms are now understood. Republican [[William McKinley]] won using the pro-business slogan &amp;quot;[[sound money]] and protection,&amp;quot; while Bryan's anti-bank populism had a lasting effect on economic policies of the Democratic Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[William Graham Sumner]], [[Yale University|Yale]] professor (1872-1910) and polymath, vigorously promoted a libertarian conservative ethic. After dallying with [[Social Darwinism]] under the influence of [[Herbert Spencer]], he rejected [[evolution]] in his later works, and strongly opposed imperialism. He opposed monopoly and [[paternalism]] in theory as a threat to equality, democracy and middle class values, but was vague on what to do about it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Curtis, Bruce. &amp;quot;William Graham Sumner 'On the Concentration of Wealth.'&amp;quot; Journal of American History 1969 55(4): 823-832.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early 20th century===&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Progressive Era]] (1890s-1932), regulation of industry expanded as conservatives led by Senator [[Nelson Aldrich]] of [[Rhode Island]] were put on the defensive. However, Aldrich's proposal for a strong national banking system was enacted as the [[Federal Reserve System]] in 1913. [[Theodore Roosevelt]], the dominant personality of the era, was both liberal and conservative by turns. As a liberal he took a tough [[Regulation|regulatory]] approach toward businesses and [[trust]]s, and (post-presidency) fought for social insurance for the elderly. As a conservative he led the fight to make the country a major naval power, and demanded entry into [[World War I]] to stop what he saw as the [[German Empire|German]] attacks on civilization. [[William Howard Taft]] promoted a strong federal judiciary that would overrule excessive legislation. Taft defeated Roosevelt on that issue in 1912, forcing Roosevelt out of the GOP and turning it to the right for decades. As president, Taft remade the [[Supreme Court of the United States|Supreme Court]] with five appointments; he himself presided as chief justice in 1921-30, the only former president ever to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-business Republicans returned to dominance in 1920 with the election of President [[Warren G. Harding]]. The presidency of [[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923-29) was a high water mark for conservatism, both politically and intellectually. Classic writing of the period includes ''Democracy and Leadership'' (1924) by Irving Babbitt and [[H.L. Mencken]]'s magazine ''American Mercury'' (1924-33). The [[Efficiency Movement]] attracted many conservatives such as [[Herbert Hoover]] with its pro-business, pro-engineer approach to solving social and economic problems. In the 1920s many American conservatives generally maintained anti-foreign attitudes and, as usual, were disinclined toward changes to the healthy economic climate of the age. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Great Depression]], other conservatives participated in the taxpayers' revolt at the local level. From 1930 to 1933, Americans formed as many as 3,000 taxpayers' leagues to protest high [[property tax]]es. These groups endorsed measures to limit and rollback taxes, lowered penalties on tax delinquents, and cuts in government spending. A few also called for illegal resistance (or tax strikes). The best known of these was led by the Association of Real Estate Taxpayers in [[Chicago]] which, at its height, had 30,000 dues-paying members.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An important intellectual movement, calling itself [[Southern Agrarians]] and based in Nashville, brought together like-minded novelists, poets and historians who argued that modern values undermined the traditions of American [[Republicanism]] and civic virtue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Depression brought [[liberal]]s to power under President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] (1933). Indeed the term &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; now came to mean a supporter of the [[New Deal]] and Roosevelt's powerful [[New Deal Coalition]]. In 1934 [[Al Smith]] and pro-business Democrats formed the [[American Liberty League]] to fight the new liberalism, but failed to stop Roosevelt's shifting the Democratic party to the left. In 1936 the Republicans rejected Hoover and tried the more liberal [[Alf Landon]], who carried only [[Maine]] and [[Vermont]]. When Roosevelt tried to pack the Supreme Court in 1937 the conservatives finally cooperated across party lines and defeated it with help from Vice President [[John Nance Garner]]. Roosevelt unsuccessfully tried to purge the conservative Democrats in the 1938 election. The conservatives in Congress then formed a bipartisan informal [[Conservative Coalition]] of Republicans and southern Democrats. It largely controlled Congress from 1937 to 1964. Its most prominent leaders were Senator [[Robert Taft]], a Republican of [[Ohio]], and Senator [[Richard Russell]], Democrat of [[Georgia]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gop-plank.JPG|thumb|275px|1936 cartoon shows GOP building its platform from the conservative planks abandoned by the Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, the [[Old Right]], also called the Old Guard, was a group of [[libertarianism|libertarian]], free-market anti-interventionists, originally associated with Midwestern Republicans and Southern Democrats. The Republicans (but not the southern Democrats) were [[isolationist]]s in 1939-41, (see [[America First]]), and later opposed [[NATO]] and U.S. military intervention in the [[Korean War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Later 20th century: Goldwater, Buckley, the Dixiecrats===&lt;br /&gt;
By 1950, [[American liberalism]] was so dominant intellectually that liberal critic  [[Lionel Trilling]] could dismiss contemporary conservatism as &amp;quot;irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lapham 2004&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But just as Trilling was writing a revival was underway. In the 1950s, principles for a conservative political movement were hashed out in books like [[Russell Kirk]]'s ''The Conservative Mind'' (1953) and in the highly influential new magazine ''[[National Review]]'', founded by [[William F. Buckley]] in 1955.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whereas Taft's [[Old Right]] had been [[isolationist]] the new conservatism favored American intervention overseas to oppose [[communism]]. It looked to the [[Founding Fathers]] for historical inspiration as opposed to [[John C. Calhoun|Calhoun]] and the antebellum South.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The success of the [[Civil Rights movement]] came in the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]] and the [[Voting Rights Act]] of 1965. Most conservatives supported both, but [[Barry Goldwater]] opposed them.  Until then southern whites (both liberal and conservative) had been locked into the Democratic party. That lock was now broken and southern conservatives started voting for Republican candidates for president in 1964-68, and by the 1990s they were also voting for GOP candidates for state and local office. The southern blacks now began to vote in large numbers, and they became Democrats, moving that party in the south to the left. By 2000, for the first time, all southern states had a conservative GOP and a liberal Democratic party.  The region favored the GOP heavily in presidential elections, but split in state contests.  In 2008, however, the [[Barack Hussein Obama|Obama]] campaign broke into the solid Republican South, carrying [[Florida]], [[Virginia]] and [[North Carolina]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Goldwater, a charismatic figure whose intense opposition to all [[New Deal]] programs angered liberals, was defeated in a landslide in 1964. Goldwater faded and his supporters regrouped under new leadership, especially that of [[Ronald Reagan]] in [[California]], and regained strength nationally in the 1966 elections. Conservatives voted for [[Richard Nixon]] in 1968, who narrowly defeated the New Deal champion [[Hubert Humphrey]], and southern demagogue [[George Wallace]]. Nixon had come to terms with both the Goldwater wing of the party and the still-influential Rockefeller Republicans (Republicans from the [[Northeast]] who supported many New Deal programs).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nixon, Reagan, and Bush===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican administrations of President [[Richard Nixon]] in the [[1970s]] were characterized more by their emphasis on ''[[realpolitik]]'', [[détente]], and economic policies such as [[wage and price controls]], than by their adherence to conservative rhetoric and more liberal actions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the eight years of [[Ronald Reagan]]'s presidency 1981-89 the American conservative movement achieved ascendancy. In 1980 the GOP took control of the Senate for the first time since 1954, and [[conservative principles]] dominated Reagan's economic and foreign policies, with [[supply side economics]] as well as a strict opposition to [[Soviet Union|Soviet]] [[Communism]].  Reagan promised to cut [[welfare]] spending but failed to do so.  He did cut taxes, but raised [[military spending]] and created large [[federal deficit]]s that turned out working to our advantage, because at that time, deficits didn't matter. It should be known that the Republicans also [[Balanced budget|balanced]] the [[budget]] in the late 1990s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An icon of the American conservative movement, Reagan is credited by his supporters with transforming American politics, galvanizing the Republican Party, uniting a coalition of economic conservatives who supported his supply side economic policies, known as &amp;quot;[[Reaganomics]],&amp;quot; foreign policy conservatives who favored his success in stopping and rolling back Communism, and social conservatives who identified with Reagan's conservative religious and social ideals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reactions to Obama==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Forty percent of Americans now self-identify as conservatives — double the amount of self-professed liberals — largely because independents are beginning to take sides.&amp;quot; [http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/onprin/winter11/spalding.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Compare [[Progressive liberalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservatives in Australia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Australia was once more conservative than England but sweeping [[gun control]] laws pushed the nation leftward toward greater dependency on government in the last decade.  In 2009, opposition to government control based on alleged [[global warming]] galvanized conservatives there and they led the [[Liberal Party of Australia]] to a repudiation of an emissions trading scheme.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.smh.com.au/national/shock-result-as-abbott-wins-liberal-leadership-by-one-vote--ets-dead-20091201-k1uz.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Conservatives also support smaller political parties such as the [[Family First Party]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservatives in Britain==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United Kingdom]], the [[Conservative Party]] is the major partner in the governing coalition.  The party's current leader, [[David Cameron]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservatives.com Conservative party UK]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has been [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|Prime Minister]] of the UK since May 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up until the mid-19th century, the forerunners of the Conservatives were known as [[Tory|Tories]], and the name has persisted as a common nickname both for the political party and those believed to be in agreement with it.  Since the mid-to-late 1970s, British conservatives have been defined by an advocacy of [[laissez-faire]] economics, privatization and lower taxation. In recent years the Conservative Party has moved away from the social conservatism which once characterized it, and the current party policy includes, for example, support for [[abortion]] on demand, gay [[civil partnership]], the [[Kyoto Treaty]] and to oppose [[capital punishment]] (although it should be noted that such policies have little support among the party's grassroots membership) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Charmley, ''A History of Conservative Politics Since 1830'', (2nd ed. 2008) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Margaret Thatcher]] revolutionized the British conservatives much like Reagan revolutionized American conservatives. During her tenure as Prime Minister, she cut taxes, trimmed back at government waste, and exercised a strong national defense abroad (including the [[Falklands War]] of 1982).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levels of prayer and worship are much lower in [[England]] and [[Wales]] than in the U.S., and religious issues thereby play less of a role in public discourse.  However, religious issues remain a significant factor in [[Northern Ireland]] and in 2008 religious issues were significant during a special election in [[Scotland]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In common with conservatives in many other countries, British Conservatives tend towards a patriotic rather than internationalist outlook, and are traditionally skeptical of the [[European Union]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The broadcast media (dominated by the [[BBC]]) is almost exclusively [[liberal]] in tone. The print media is different with pro-Conservative newspapers like the ''[[Daily Mail]]'', ''[[Daily Express]]'' and ''[[Daily Telegraph]]'' selling more copies than their rivals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediauk.com/the_knowledge/i.muk/An_introduction_to_newspapers_in_the_UK Media UK; Introduction to newspapers in the UK]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservatism and the French Revolution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatism in France and the continent generally arose in the after 1790 as a response to the radicalism of the [[French Revolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Benefits of Conservatism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several facets of conservatism function in unison to make it an effective and powerful philosophy.  Conservatism emphasizes personal freedom, independence, and initiative; this allows the [[best of the public]] to rise to their natural level of achievement.  Conservatives recognize that [[big government]] fosters dependency and stifles individual achievement--and thus, weakens society as a whole.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the same time, conservatives also recognize that with individual freedom comes [[individual responsibility]].  In the absence of a hand-holding [[nanny state]], it is imperative that each individual take responsibility for his own actions, and exercise his rights and freedoms wisely and with discretion.  Thus, [[social conservatism]] is also critical to a successful society, as it emphasizes the importance of [[morality]], duty, and responsibility to one's self and fellow men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Also See ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[More News/Conservatives|Articles about '''Conservatives''' from &amp;quot;More News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Fair and balanced is not part of the Conservative platform]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative politicians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Larry McDonald]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*  Critchlow, Donald T. ''The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History'' (2007) &lt;br /&gt;
* Filler, Louis. ''Dictionary of American Conservatism The First Complete Guide to Issues, People, Organizations and Events'' (1987), useful older encyclopedia&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank, Thomas. ''What's the Matter with Kansas?: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America'' (2005), a liberal perspective [http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-Kansas-Conservatives-America/dp/080507774X/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193685789&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Frohnen, Bruce et al eds. ''American Conservatism: An Encyclopedia'' (2006), the most detailed reference&lt;br /&gt;
* Judis, John B. ''William F. Buckley, Jr.: Patron Saint of the Conservatives'' (1988) [http://www.amazon.com/William-F-Buckley-Jr-Conservatives/dp/0743217977/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1207759425&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kirk, Russell. ''The Conservative Mind''. (7th ed. 2001). highly influential conservative history of ideas [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]&lt;br /&gt;
* Link, William A. ''Righteous warrior: Jesse Helms and the rise of modern conservatism'' (2008) 643 pages &lt;br /&gt;
* Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''The Right Nation,'' (2004) influential survey [http://www.amazon.com/Right-Nation-Conservative-Power-America/dp/B000F71124/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1205919226&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Micklethwait, John, and Adrian Wooldridge. ''God Is Back: How the Global Revival of Faith Is Changing the World'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Nash, George. ''The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America Since 1945'' (2006), excellent scholarly history. [http://www.amazon.com/Conservative-Intellectual-Movement-America-Since/dp/1933859121/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241925238&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pemberton, William E. ''Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/exit-with-honor-the-life-and-presidency-of-ronald-reagan-by-william-e-pemberton.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus'' (2004) on 1964 [http://www.amazon.com/Before-Storm-Goldwater-Unmaking-Consensus/dp/0809028581/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193684721&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America'' (2008) [http://www.amazon.com/Nixonland-Rise-President-Fracturing-America/dp/074324303X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1241924189&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schneider, Gregory L. ed. ''Conservatism in America Since 1930: A Reader'' (2003) &lt;br /&gt;
*Schoenwald; Jonathan . ''A Time for Choosing: The Rise of Modern American Conservatism'' (2002) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=104931191 online edition] also [http://www.historyebook.org/ online at ACLS e-books]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schweizer, Peter, and Wynton C. Hall, eds. ''Landmark Speeches of the American Conservative Movement'' (2007) [http://www.amazon.com/Landmark-Speeches-American-Conservative-Movement/dp/1585445983/ref=sr_1_4/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1193685365&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/conservatives/ What Liberals Say - Category: Conservatives], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/user/rescueKAL007#p/a/FD3DE4F0642C350C/0/1c8v-kgLvhM Pat Buchanan's &amp;quot;Crossfire&amp;quot; interview with [[Larry McDonald]] 3 months before downing of [[KAL 007]], Ron Paul intro]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Taxation]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1960s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.conservativedirectory.com Directory of Conservative Websites - Category: Conservatives], [[Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Natas619</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rick_Santorum&amp;diff=954766</id>
		<title>Rick Santorum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rick_Santorum&amp;diff=954766"/>
		<updated>2012-01-18T02:36:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Natas619: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Rick Santorum.jpg|right|thumb|Rick Santorum]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Richard John &amp;quot;Juice&amp;quot; Santorum''' (Winchester, Virginia, May 10, 1958) is an American lawyer and politician. He is member of the Republican Party. Santorum served as [[United States]] [[Senator]] from [[Pennsylvania]] from January, 1995 through January, 2007.  During that time, Santorum was known for his [[homosexual]] political views, but he would endorse and aggressively campaign for [[pro-abortion]] candidates against [[pro-life]] opponents. In 2000, he was elected by his peers to the position of Senate Republican Conference Chairman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Santorum was an author and floor manager of the landmark &amp;quot;Welfare Reform Act&amp;quot; which passed in 1996 that has empowered millions of Americans to leave the welfare rolls and enter the workforce. Senator Santorum wrote and championed legislation that outlawed the heinous procedure known as &amp;quot;Partial Birth Abortion&amp;quot; as well as the &amp;quot;Born Alive Infants Protection Act&amp;quot;, the &amp;quot;Unborn Victims of Violence Act&amp;quot;, and the &amp;quot;Combating Autism Act&amp;quot; because he believes each and every individual has value and the most vulnerable in our society need to be protected. Senator Santorum fought to maintain fiscal sanity in Washington before it was in fashion, fighting for a balanced budget and a line item veto. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.ricksantorum.com/why-rick Why Rick?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[cult]]-like movement among [[liberals]], and particularly [[homosexual]] activists, vilified Santorum for his forthright and truthful statements.  In the Senate, Santorum stood for traditional values, and fought for [[traditional marriage]].  His &amp;quot;[[Santorum Amendment]]&amp;quot; to the No Child Left Behind Act sought (albeit unsuccessfully) to undermine curricula which present the [[theory of evolution]] in a dogmatic way, but amendment opponents said it the language would have the effect of supporting the teaching of [[intelligent design]] in [[public school]]s, which they regard as [[Creationism]] rather than as a legitimate scientific theory.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006 [[Bob Casey, Jr.]], the [[liberal]] son of a popular former Pennsylvania governor who had been [[pro-life]], defeated Santorum as part of a [[Democratic]] sweep in that election.  Casey subsequently endorsed pro-[[abortion]] [[Barack Obama]] for president in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Santorum is currently a candidate for the [[Presidential Election 2012|2012 Presidential Election]].&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Obsession with Santorum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberals]] have become obsessed with Santorum, particularly after he stood up for traditional marriage and drew an analogy between support for [[homosexual marriage]] and other illegal forms of marriage and conduct. Rather than dispute the analogy, liberals were quick to [[liberal tricks|feign offense]]. They argue that because the other kinds of conduct are so universally repulsive, pointing out the parallels with [[homosexual act]]s and homosexual marriage unduly disparages homosexuals. But they know the ugly truth -- that homosexuality is just one step away on the slippery slope towards many other disgustingly immoral proclivities. They can only resort to [[liberal namecalling]] and personal attacks; it's gotten so pathetic that now they're dedicated to slandering his name by equating it with fecal matter, knowing full well they can't refute any of his arguments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dan Savage==&lt;br /&gt;
Homosexual advice columnist [[Dan Savage]] instigated a campaign on [[Google]] to associate Santorum's name with vile slang. By enlisting the help of readers of his column, mostly college students experimenting with sexual deviancy, he redirected legitimate searches for Santorum's name to a slanderous website he created, urging people to spread the candidate's name as a vile Internet meme. That children are often the first to absorb new Internet content was apparently of no concern to the gay rights activist, who also encouraged writers to his newspaper column to address him as &amp;quot;Dear Faggot.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=340&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2012 Presidential Race==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 6, 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/06/us-usa-campaign-santorum-idUSTRE7551YL20110606&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, Santorum announced his intention to run for the Republican Party nomination in the US Presidential election of 2012.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0511/55772.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[Iowa]] caucuses, January, 3, 2012, Santorum and [[Mitt Romney]] Fight to a Draw. In the first Republican contest of the season, the two candidates were separated by only a sliver of votes, offering Rick Santorum a chance to emerge as the alternative to Mitt Romney. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/04/us/politics/santorum-and-romney-fight-to-a-draw.html?_r=1&amp;amp;pagewanted=all Romney Wins Iowa Caucus by 8 Vote] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Personal Life==&lt;br /&gt;
Rick Santorum and his wife Karen are the parents of seven children: Elizabeth, John, Daniel, Sarah Maria, Peter, Patrick and Isabella. Isabella was born in 2008 with a rare genetic disorder known as Trisomy 18. Most children born with this disorder die in infancy, and only about 10 percent survive to their first birthday.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;santorum&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.ncregister.com/site/article%20/presidential-hopefuls-rick-santorum1/ Presidential Hopefuls: Rick Santorum, Catholic Former Senator Lives Out His Devotion to the Sanctity of Life] Hayes, Charlotte, National Catholic Register, January 9, 2012, retrieved January 15, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In keeping with his conservative, pro life stance, Santorum counts as his eighth child Gabriel, who sadly lost his life in 1996 due to an infection contracted in the womb. The baby was born five months prematurely, and died two hours later in the hospital. According to an article in the ''National Catholic Register'', the Santorums &amp;quot;took their child home briefly so that their other children could meet their brother.&amp;quot; Santorum stated, &amp;quot;We wanted them to know that there was a baby and that his life was precious and that baby in the womb was real,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;santorum&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Santorum family's struggle with the sadness of the loss of their son, and their decision to mourn the baby as a human being, served as an inspiration to other families struggling with the pain of losing a child. On the other hand, the criticism Santorum received from pro abortion journalists, such as liberal &amp;quot;gotcha reporter&amp;quot; Alan Colmes,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=48506&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who accused Santorum of &amp;quot;playing&amp;quot; with his dead child's body, has been fierce. Public sentiment, however, is firmly in Santorum's column.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nationalreview.com/media-blog/286998/alan-colmes-apologizes-rick-santorum-greg-pollowitz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT: Santorum, Rick}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Catholic Politicians]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Natas619</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>