<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=MoeLarryAndJesus</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=MoeLarryAndJesus"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/MoeLarryAndJesus"/>
	<updated>2026-09-28T13:34:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Human_cloning&amp;diff=37646</id>
		<title>Human cloning</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Human_cloning&amp;diff=37646"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:42:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Human cloning is the copying of a human using the DNA in the cells of the donor.  People have tried to&lt;br /&gt;
clone embryos, but the cloned child has not survived past birth. There are some moral and social issues with this that have yet to be addressed. For example, would a clone be the child of its donor, or its sibling (genetically, a clone is simply an artifical identical twin)? If these questions cannot be properly answered, there could be severe repercussions for inheritance laws.  It's also possible that someone would clone Carrot Top, and nobody wants that.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Phillip_E._Johnson&amp;diff=37643</id>
		<title>Phillip E. Johnson</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Phillip_E._Johnson&amp;diff=37643"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:39:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Phillip E. Johnson is considered the originator and the leading spokesman for the [[intelligent design]] movement, although he has no scientific credentials.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creationwiki.org/Phillip_Johnson CreationWiki - Phillip Johnson]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Quarter&amp;diff=37638</id>
		<title>Talk:Quarter</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Quarter&amp;diff=37638"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:36:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;All quarters have George Washington on the front, and the statement &amp;quot;In God We Trust&amp;quot;. This is because the two most important people in American History are God and George Washington.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Um....  --[[User:MoeLarryAndJesus|MoeLarryAndJesus]] 01:36, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MoeLarryAndJesus&amp;diff=37632</id>
		<title>User talk:MoeLarryAndJesus</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MoeLarryAndJesus&amp;diff=37632"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:34:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;You've been around way to long to not be welcomed. So... WELCOME! --&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;#0000CC&amp;quot; face=&amp;quot;Comic Sans MS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;00FFAA&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:31, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks!  --[[User:MoeLarryAndJesus|MoeLarryAndJesus]] 01:34, 15 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nobel_Prize&amp;diff=37631</id>
		<title>Nobel Prize</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nobel_Prize&amp;diff=37631"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:33:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
Begun in 1901, the '''Nobel Prize''' has been the highest honor for achievements in [[physics]], [[chemistry]], [[medicine]] or [[physiology]], [[literature]] and [[peace]]. [[Economics]] was added as a prize in 1969.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The selection process has become political{{fact}}, as it was not given to [[Ronald Reagan]] or [[Pope John Paul II]] or to anyone who criticizes the theory of evolution.  The Nobel Prizes for literature and peace are mostly given to outspoken liberals{{fact}}, such as [[Jimmy Carter]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In two cases, the Nobel Prize was denied to the person most responsible for the discovery apparently because they had been critical of the theory of evolution.{{fact}} No other plausible explanation has been advanced for these awards.{{fact}} Also most Nobel Prizes are awarded to  scientists, which has caused many to propose an alternate scientific award given to scientists who support [[Biblical]] principles.  Nothing is stopping anyone from granting such awards.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One omission was for the British physicist [[Fred Hoyle]]. He was the leader on the project recognized with a Nobel Prize{{fact}}, but he was omitted from the recipients. Hoyle was an outspoken critic of the theory of evolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fred Hoyle, The Big Bang in Astronomy, in New Scientist, November 19, 1981.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another omission was for [[Raymond Damadian]], another critic of the theory of evolution{{fact}}, who invented the [[Magnetic Resonance Imaging]] (MRI) scanner, but was omitted from the award relating to that accomplishment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whyfiles.org/188nobel_mri/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marriage&amp;diff=37620</id>
		<title>Marriage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marriage&amp;diff=37620"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:30:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Marriage''' is a form of [[interpersonal relationship]].  Most often, it takes the form of a union between a [[man]] and a [[woman]], however, other forms, such as [[polygyny]] (one man and more than one woman), [[polyandry]] (one woman and more than one man), and [[group marriage]] (any number of men, any number of women) exist.  In the civilized Western world marriage as an institution between one man and one woman has been a cornerstone of community for many hundreds of years.  Recently there has been a push by [[liberal]]s for &amp;quot;same-sex marriage&amp;quot; however this supposed form of &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot; has no basis in scripture, common law, the constitution, biology, or American social tradition.  Then again, interracial marriage was considered to be taboo 40 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Christianity==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In most branches of Christianity, marriage is a life-long religious union between a man and a woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mormonism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, [[Mormonism]] has practiced polygyny.  It stopped being a part of mainstream Mormonism in 1890, but some fringe groups still practice it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Civil marriage==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Civil marriage is a legal [[contract]] between two or more adults.  It gives each member certain rights and obligations.  Most commonly, these include [[power of attorney]], [[inheritance]] rights, and rights in relation to any children they may have.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Chappaquiddick_incident&amp;diff=37609</id>
		<title>Chappaquiddick incident</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Chappaquiddick_incident&amp;diff=37609"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:27:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Chappaquiddick''' is the name of a small island, about six square miles, just off of Martha's Vineyard in Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Most of it is conservation land held by the Trustees of Reservations, a private organization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is most famous as the location of an event known as the &amp;quot;Chappaquiddick incident,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Chappaquiddick affair,&amp;quot; or simply &amp;quot;Chappaquiddick.&amp;quot;  The narrow bridge connecting Chappaquiddick Island to Martha's Vineyard was the location of the death of a young woman Mary Jo Kopechne in a car driven by Senator [[Ted Kennedy]] on July 19, 1969.  This became one of the most famous political events of the late 20th century and likely prevented Ted Kennedy, the brother of President John F. Kennedy, from ever becoming president himself.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was the statement given by Ted Kennedy to Police Chief Dominick Arena the morning after the accident.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;On July 18, 1969, at approximately 11:15 PM in Chappaquiddick, Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts, I was driving my car on Main Street on my way to get the ferry back to Edgartown. I was unfamiliar with the road and turned right onto Dike Road, instead of bearing hard left on Main Street. After proceeding for approximately one-half mile on Dike Road I descended a hill and came upon a narrow bridge. The car went off the side of the bridge. There was one passenger with me, one Miss Mary ________(Kennedy did not know how to spell the woman's last name), a former secretary of my brother Sen. Robert Kennedy. The car turned over and sank into the water and landed with the roof resting on the bottom. I attempted to open the door and the window of the car but have no recollection of how I got out of the car. I came to the surface and then repeatedly dove down to the car in an attempt to see if the passenger was still in the car. I was unsuccessful in the attempt. I was exhausted and in a state of shock. I recall walking back to where my friends were eating. There was a car parked in front of the cottage and I climbed into the back seat. I then asked for someone to bring me back to Edgartown. I remember walking around for a period of time and then going back to my hotel room. When I fully realized what had happened this morning, I immediately contacted the police.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1979, a ''New York Times'' editorial observed:&lt;br /&gt;
:More important now than the loose ends of his unsatisfying accounts are the reasons they were left so loose. If Mr. Kennedy used his enormous influence to protect himself by leading a cover-up of misconduct&amp;amp;mdash;and the known facts lead to that suspicion&amp;amp;mdash;there would hang over him not just a cloud of tragedy, but of corruption, of the Watergate kind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Legacy of Chappaquiddick,&amp;quot; ''The New York Times,''  November 7, 1979, p. A30&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet&amp;diff=37604</id>
		<title>Internet</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet&amp;diff=37604"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:26:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Internet is a global network of interconnected smaller computer networks.  Data is transmitted in small packets using the Internet Protocol (IP) where are then reassembled.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_M._Kennedy&amp;diff=37599</id>
		<title>Edward M. Kennedy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Edward_M._Kennedy&amp;diff=37599"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:25:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Edward Moore (&amp;quot;Ted&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Teddy&amp;quot;) Kennedy (b. 1932) is the second longest-serving U.S. Senator, a Democrat from Massachusetts.  His family has been a major part of the Democratic Party for almost 50 years, beginning with his older brothers President [[John F. Kennedy]] (assassinated in 1963) and [[Robert F. Kennedy]] (assassinated in 1968).  Ted Kennedy was long assumed to become the Democratic nominee for president himself, but the [[Chappaquiddick]] scandal in 1969 caused him to delay his candidacy until 1980, when he was unable to overcome the power of incumbency enjoyed by Democratic President [[Jimmy Carter]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ted Kennedy has always represented the most [[liberal]] side of the Democratic Party, from support for taxpayer-funded abortion to same-sex marriage.  He is unbeatable in his home state of Massachusetts, but the crafty Senator [[Robert Byrd]] did defeat him for a leadership position (Majority Whip) in the Senate in 1971 and Kennedy was never able to become Majority Leader.  Nevertheless, his  political power behind the scenes is undisputed, and he played a key role in the crafting the language in the [[No Child Left Behind]] of 2001 (Public Law 107-110), a massive [[education]] bill signed into law by Republican President [[George W. Bush]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He is currently Chairman of the United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions, where the first bill he pushed through was an increase in the minimum wage by $2.10, to $7.25.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Juan_Peron&amp;diff=37584</id>
		<title>Juan Peron</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Juan_Peron&amp;diff=37584"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:23:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Peron served as President of Argentina from  1946 to 1955 as well as 1973 to 1974. He is known as one of the most contentious Presidents because of his participation in harboring Nazi fugitives fleeing trial after World War II.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Red_Cross&amp;diff=37575</id>
		<title>Red Cross</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Red_Cross&amp;diff=37575"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:22:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Red Cross is an organization that helps wounded and imprisoned soldiers in wartime,&lt;br /&gt;
and during peacetime collects medical supples and trains nurses. The organizaton was proposes by Jean-Henri Dunant, a Swiss-businessman, who was deeply affected by the suffering and hardship of the wounded soldiers in the Italian war for independence. In 1862, he proposed a worldwide group of volunteers be formed to help the wounded and imprisoned in wartime. In 1863, he suggested a gathering of world nations to develop such an institute. In 1864, the Swiss government held a conference with representatives of many nations who drafted the first Geneva Convention. This convention brought the Red Cross movement into existence. The organizations symbol is a red cross on a white background.  In Islamic countries the symbol is a red crescent and the organization is named accordingly.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&amp;diff=37562</id>
		<title>Dinosaur</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&amp;diff=37562"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:18:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: /* Humans and Dinosaurs Coexisting */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The word '''dinosaur''' was coined in 1841 by Richard Owen&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.trueauthority.com/dinosaurs/about.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, from the  [[Greek]] for &amp;quot;terrible lizard&amp;quot; (fututor).  Dinosaurs were a group of large [[reptiles]] that previously lived in abundance on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consensus among peer-reviewed science is that dinosaurs lived from 230 million until 65 million years ago and that they are all currently extinct (however [[birds]] are considered by scientists to be descended from early [[therapod]] dinosaurs).  Many Creationists dispute this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dinosaurs through Science==&lt;br /&gt;
What follow are the perspectives on dinosaurs accepted by the vast majority of the scientific community, through use of the [[scientific method]], and taught in the world's major research universities.  Following any of the references in this section will lead to scientific treatment of the issue discussed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Dinosaur Speciation===&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaur species were immensely varied, from herbivores to carnivores.  Although many have been found in the fossil record, paleontologists expect that they have barely scratched the surface of the vast genus that the dinosaurs encompassed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;National Geographic, http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/060905-dinosaurs_2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Extinction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:800px-KT_boundary_054.jpg|thumb|right|300px|Badlands near [[Drumheller, Alberta]] where erosion has exposed the KT boundary.]]Close to 65 million years ago, at the end of the [[Cretaceous]] period, and the beginning of what we call the [[Tertiary]] period, an event occurred which has come to be known as the [[K-T Event]].  This event obliterated most life on Earth, plunging the world into something that would now be likened to global nuclear winter, through which few extant species could survive.  Although scientists dispute the nature of the K-T Event (selecting among any number of catastrophes that could have caused the significant global cooling that resulted), most find, based on strong geological evidence, that the K-T Event was caused by the collision of a massive asteroid with the Earth, the dust and debris from which shrouded the sky for thousands of years, cooling Earth considerably.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kevin O Pope, &amp;quot;Meteorite impact and the mass extinction of species at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary,&amp;quot; Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, available at http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/19/11028&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The dinosaurs did not survive this cataclysm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;National Geographic, http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/08/0823_020823_asteroid.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Evidence of the dust that caused this long winter is still visible, though, as a line of metal of extraterrestrial origin is often visible in sediment worldwide, occurring as a result of the vaporization and then fall of dust from the meteorite's impact, and its compression within the subsequent geological record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Ibid.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The crater is also visible.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;National Geographic, http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0307_030307_impactcrater.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cambrian Life Explosion===&lt;br /&gt;
The extinction of the dinosaurs removed a major food competitor, and predator, of smaller animals.  As a result of a new &amp;quot;vacancy&amp;quot; in the food chain, following the [[K-T Event]], vast speciation occurred, as the evolutionary pressure of a new cold age propelled animal species to adapt or die out.  What we now know as [[mammals]] were some of the main beneficiaries of this explosion: their fur allowed them to adapt to the cold, and their small size allowed them to conserve energy relative to the huge dinosaurs of the previous age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bennet, Shostak, Jakotsky, &amp;quot;Life in the Universe,&amp;quot; viewable at http://www.amazon.com/Life-Universe-Jeffrey-Bennett/dp/0805385770&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Dinosaurs and Birds===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a number of feathered dinosaur fossils have been discovered, and the similarity in the bone structure between birds and dinosaurs, scientists contend that modern birds are a descendant of dinosaurs.  This is cited as an example of [[macroevolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;National Geographic, &amp;quot;New Dinosaur Discovered: T-Rex Cousin Had Feathers,&amp;quot; http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/10/1006_041006_feathery_dino.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dinosaurs and Creation==&lt;br /&gt;
What follow are religious perspectives on dinosaurs, offered by organizations such as &amp;quot;Answers in Genesis,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Creation on the Web.&amp;quot;  Following any of the links associated with this section will lead to a treatment of the issue in line with Biblical literalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Humans and Dinosaurs Coexisting===&lt;br /&gt;
Some claim there are a number of lines of evidence that point to dinosaurs and man coexisting. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dinosaurs.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3061/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For example, explorers have reported seeing a live dinosaur.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v15/i4/dinosaurs.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A thousand people reported seeing a dinosaur-like monster in two sightings around Sayram Lake in Xinjiang according to the Chinese publication, China Today.  A documentary exists starring the American actor Raymond Burr in which a dinosaur menaces mainland Japan, but the veracity of the film is disputed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v15/i4/dinosaurs.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An expedition which included Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which is claimed to portray dinosaurs and man coexisting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationism.org/swift/DohenyExpedition/Doheny01Main.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_hava_supai_dinosaur_carving&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The Nile Mosaic of Palestrina, a second century piece of art, is said to appear to be a piece of artwork that shows a dinosaur and man coexisting. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.s8int.com/dinolit2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An alternate theory for the inclusion of dinosaurs within many cultures is the existence of fossils. Ancient people, unaware that the ancient fossils uncovered by erosion were of extinct animals, attributed the bones to living, magical creatures. This would explain the importance of dragons in Chinese culture - there are a large number of dinosaur (as well as non-dinosaur) fossils to be found in China &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH712.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Dinosaurs and Creationism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some [[Christians]] reject the [[Theory of Evolution]] and the current science community consensus of the age of the earth. Of those Christians who reject evolution, the [[Creationism | Young Earth Creationists]] believe, based primarily on Biblical [[sources]], but also drawing on [[archeological]] and fossil evidence, that dinosaurs were created on the 6th day of the [[Creation Week]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Genesis'', 1:25&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a final addendum to the wonders God created, approximately 6,000 years ago; that they lived in the [[Garden of Eden]] in harmony with other animals, eating only plants&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Genesis'' 1:29-30&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; that pairs of various dinosaurs were taken onto [[Noah's Ark]] during the [[Great Flood]] and were preserved from drowning&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2001/dinos_on_ark.asp &amp;quot;Were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark?&amp;quot;], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; that fossilized dinosaur bones originated during the mass killing of the Flood&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v21/i1/dinosaurbones.asp &amp;quot;Dinosaur bones—just how old are they really?&amp;quot;], ''Creation'' 21(1):54–55, December 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; and that some descendants of those dinosaurs taken aboard the Ark still roam the earth today&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v15/i4/dinosaurs.asp &amp;quot;Are dinosaurs alive today?&amp;quot;], ''Creation'' 15(4):12–15, September 1993&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, even though none of the six billion people currently residing on the planet have seen them. It should be noted that none of these claims have been backed by any serious scientific research, and rely almost wholly either on the infallibility of the Bible, or on human speculations based to a greater or lesser degree upon the Biblical account. Ken Ham states the theory that Dinosaurs were killed during the great flood, buried in mud and then fossilized.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/08/1/l_081_04.html Ken Ham at PBS.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the term only came into use in the 19th century, the [[Bible]] obviously does not use the word &amp;quot;dinosaur.&amp;quot;  However, they are alleged to be mentioned in numerous places throughout the biblical account. For example, the '''behemoth''' in [[Job]]  and the '''leviathan''' in [[Isaiah]] are sometimes said to be references to dinosaurs,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i2/behemoth.asp &amp;quot;Could Behemoth have been a dinosaur?&amp;quot;], ''TJ'' 15(2):42–45, August 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersincreation.org/job4041a.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, although some reject this view, saying that behemoth was a hippopotamus and leviathan was a crocodile. There is a problem with this view, however, such as the fact that a hippo doesn't have a &amp;quot;tail like a cedar&amp;quot; and a crocodile does not accurately match the description of leviathan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==	 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bodhisattva&amp;diff=37541</id>
		<title>Bodhisattva</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bodhisattva&amp;diff=37541"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:11:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: Erased irrelevant section.  It's an encyclopedia, not a pulpit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;In [[Buddhism]], a '''bodhisattva''' is an enlightened person who delays nirvana in order to help others reach Nirvana. [[Mahayana]] and [[Theravada]] Buddhism have different attitudes towards bodhisattvas. In the Theravada tradition, a person can achieve complete enlightenment as an individual without becoming a bodhisattva. In contrast, Mahayana take a dim view of such individuals and argue that in order to achieve true and complete Nirvana, one must become a bodhisattva.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=John_Kerry&amp;diff=37519</id>
		<title>John Kerry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=John_Kerry&amp;diff=37519"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:06:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: /* Anti-War Activities */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''John Forbes Kerry''' (born December 11, 1943) has been a Democratic member of the United States Senate from [[Massachusetts]] since 1984 and has consistently held one of the most [[liberal]] voting records in the Senate. In 2004, he received the Democratic presidential nomination and lost to President [[George W. Bush]] by a 51-48% margin in the country-wide popular vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Anti-War Activities=&lt;br /&gt;
John Kerry belonged to Vietnam Veterans Against the War ([[VVAW]]), where he attacked the conduct of some American soldiers. [1]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[1][http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41106 Free Republic]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heinrich_Himmler&amp;diff=37507</id>
		<title>Heinrich Himmler</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heinrich_Himmler&amp;diff=37507"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:03:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Heinrich Himmler was born in [[Munich]] in 1900. He was an early follower of [[Adolf Hitler]]{{fact}}, and in 1936 he was named chief of police for all of [[Germany]]. When the [[SS]] was established in 1925 Himmler was given command of that also. In 1943 he was made Minister of the Interior and Minister of Home Defense in 1944. He died in 1945 when he committed suicide after being captured by the [[Allies|Allied]] troops. Himmler was one of the most sinister of all the Nazi leaders. Miilions were killed by men under his command{{fact}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Old_Deluder_Act&amp;diff=37503</id>
		<title>The Old Deluder Act</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Old_Deluder_Act&amp;diff=37503"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T05:02:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Old Deluder Act was passed in 1647 in Massachusetts.  It established the first public schools in [[America]] to teach children to read, so that Satan would not delude them by keeping the from reading the [[Bible]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
= The Old Deluder Act =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England (1853), II: 203 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It being one chief project of that old deluder, Satan, to keep men from the knowledge of the Scriptures, as in former times by keeping them in an unknown tongue, so in these latter times by persuading from the use of tongues, that so that at least the true sense and meaning of the original might be clouded and corrupted with false glosses of saint-seeming deceivers; and to the end that learning may not be buried in the grave of our forefathers, in church and commonwealth, the Lord assisting our endeavors. &lt;br /&gt;
It is therefore ordered that every township in this jurisdiction, after the Lord hath increased them to fifty households shall forthwith appoint one within their town to teach all such children as shall resort to him to write and read, whose wages shall be paid either by the parents or masters of such children, or by the inhabitants in general, by way of supply, as the major part of those that order the prudentials of the town shall appoint; provided those that send their children be not oppressed by paying much more than they can have them taught for in other towns. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it is further ordered, that when any town shall increase to the number of one hundred families or householders, they shall set up a grammar school, the master thereof being able to instruct youth so far as they may be fitted for the university, provided that if any town neglect the performance hereof above one year that every such town shall pay 5 pounds to the next school till they shall perform this order.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Engel_v._Vitale&amp;diff=37457</id>
		<title>Engel v. Vitale</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Engel_v._Vitale&amp;diff=37457"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T04:54:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Engel v. Vitale'', 370 U.S. 421 (1962) was the landmark [[U.S. Supreme Court]] decision that prohibited prayer in public schools.  Many consider this decision to have been one of the most significant events in modern American history.   Many conservative legal scholars criticized this ruling.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, Erwin Griswold, dean of the Harvard Law School, said in a major speech that the Court had no authority to prohibit prayer in public school:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Washington Star'' (Mar. 3, 1963)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Congress had made no law [as required by the text of the [[First Amendment]], and] those who wrote the 'establishment of religion' clause might be rather perplexed by the use which has been made of it in 1962. ...  [I]t was unfortunate that the Court decided the case, one way or the other [because] there are some matters which are essentially local in nature ... to be worked out by the people themselves in their own communities. ...  In a country which has a great tradition of tolerance, is it not important that minorities, who have benefited so greatly from that tolerance, should be tolerant, too?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sources:''' &amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vatican_City&amp;diff=37441</id>
		<title>Vatican City</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Vatican_City&amp;diff=37441"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T04:51:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: Spelling Corrections&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Edited by Maureen O'Toole                                                                                                                                                  &lt;br /&gt;
                                                                                                                                                                                         &lt;br /&gt;
Vatican City is an independent state which houses the Government of the Roman Catholic Church and which is surrounded  by the city of Rome. Until 1871 the Pope held a civil power over a considerable territory, called the Papal States. This land was made a part of Italy during the unification of 1871. By the treaty of the lateran in 1929,Italy restored the Pope's temporal, or civil, power within the confines of Vatican City.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nazi&amp;diff=37430</id>
		<title>Nazi</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nazi&amp;diff=37430"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T04:49:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Nazis were a [[fascist]] political party in Germany in the first half of the 20th century. The official name of the party was the '''Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei''', or [[National Socialist German Workers Party]] (NSDAP). It's most notable leader was [[Adolf Hitler]], known as Der Fuhrer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis were not in any way, shape or form [[conservative]], this despite the portrayal of it by some as a product or form of ultra-conservatism. (Of course, they were anti-abortion, anti-socialist, anti-homosexual, anti-feminist, and highly militaristic.) Rather, they were a [[radical]] movement rooted in an extreme interpretation of [[Darwinism]] wherein the weak were regarded with contempt, and the [[Jews]] as a threat to society who needed to be eliminated.  The Nazis were on the whole anti-[[Christian]] and regarded Christianity with little more than contempt as a religion of the &amp;quot;weak&amp;quot; rooted in Judaism.  Specific cultural movements eventually feeding into the rise of the Nazi Party to power included an [[occultism]] movement interested in black magic and Germanic pre-Christian [[pagan]] religion popular in Germany in the decades before [[WWII]]; and a [[counterculture]] movement of disaffected and alienated youth after [[WWI]] known as the ''Wandervogel'', which eventually provided much of the recruitment base for the S.S. and S.A., two Nazi Party [[paramilitary]] groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their hatred of the Jews eventually led to the [[Holocaust]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nazi&amp;diff=37426</id>
		<title>Nazi</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nazi&amp;diff=37426"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T04:49:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Nazis were a [[fascist]] political party in Germany in the first half of the 20th century. The official name of the party was the '''Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei''', or [[National Socialist German Workers Party]] (NSDAP). It's most notable leader was [[Adolf Hitler]], known as Der Fuhrer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis were not in any way, shape or form [[conservative]], this despite the portrayal of it by some as a product or form of ultra-conservatism. (Of course, they were anti-abortion, anti-socialist, anti-homosexual, anti-feminist, and highly militaristic.) Rather, they were a [[radical]] movement rooted in an extreme interpretation of [[Darwinism]] wherein the weak were regarded with contempt, and the [[Jews]] as a threat to society who needed to be eliminated.  The Nazis were on the whole anti-[[Christian]] and regarded Christianity with little more than contempt as a religion of the &amp;quot;weak&amp;quot; rooted in Judaism.  Specific cultural movements eventually feeding into the rise of the Nazi Party to power included an [[occultism]] movement interested in black magic and Germanic pre-Christian [[pagan]] religion popular in Germany in the decades before [[WWII]]; and a [[counterculture]] movement of disaffected and alienated youth after [[WWI]] known as the ''Wandervogel'', which eventually provided much of the recruitment base for the S.S. and S.A., two Nazi Party [[paramilitary]] groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their hatred of the Jews eventually led to the [[Holocaust]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Naziflag.png]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joshua_(Biblical_leader)&amp;diff=37414</id>
		<title>Joshua (Biblical leader)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Joshua_(Biblical_leader)&amp;diff=37414"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T04:46:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Joshua was the designated successor of [[Moses]] who led the [[Israelites]] into the promised land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He killed the entire population of [[Jericho]] and [[Ai]], and defeated the combined forces of Jerusalem, Hebron, Jarmuth, Lachish, and Eglon. God made the sun stand still in the sky (figuratively speaking - since the Earth actually revolves around the Sun, and not vice versa) so he had more time to kill everyone. He also massacred the 22 kingdoms of Hazor (Joshua 11:14).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A famous quote by Joshua is 'As for me and my house I will serve the LORD', often appearing on Christian memorabilia.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fresco&amp;diff=37408</id>
		<title>Fresco</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fresco&amp;diff=37408"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T04:45:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Paintings done on wet plaster; seen in Egyptian tombs, Pompeii, and many Italian Renaissance buildings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Painting]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Hampshire&amp;diff=37181</id>
		<title>New Hampshire</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Hampshire&amp;diff=37181"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T03:23:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;New Hampshire was one of the first 13 states. It was the 9th state to ratify the Constitution of the United States of America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                [[Image:New_hampshire.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New Hampshire's main industries are state-run liquor stores and toll booths strung along the border with Massachusetts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US state]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Hampshire&amp;diff=37177</id>
		<title>New Hampshire</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=New_Hampshire&amp;diff=37177"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T03:23:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;New Hampshire was one of the first 13 states. It was the 9th state to ratify the Constitution of the United States of America.                [[Image:New_hampshire.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New Hampshire's main industries are state-run liquor stores and toll booths strung along the border with Massachusetts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:US state]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pope&amp;diff=37165</id>
		<title>Pope</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pope&amp;diff=37165"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T03:18:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Pope (from Latin &amp;quot;papa&amp;quot;, father) is the [[head]] of the [[Catholic]] church. Today the pope is [[Pope Benedict XVI]]. He strongly opposes abortion, torture, and pre-emptive war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Pope is impeccable (see Dictatus Papae).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Emiliano_Zapato&amp;diff=37071</id>
		<title>Talk:Emiliano Zapato</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Emiliano_Zapato&amp;diff=37071"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T02:39:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;Emiliano Zapato lived August 8, 1879 – April 10, 1919. He was of key importance in the Mexican Revolution. He should not be confused with Emiliano Zapata, who lived August 8, 1879 – April 10, 1919 and was of key importance in the Mexican Revolution.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now THAT is funny.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seriously, the level of literacy on this site is almost as bad as it is on FreeRepublic.com --[[User:MoeLarryAndJesus|MoeLarryAndJesus]] 22:39, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Karl_Rove&amp;diff=37067</id>
		<title>Karl Rove</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Karl_Rove&amp;diff=37067"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T02:37:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Karl Rove, born on [[Christmas]], 1950 AD, is the [[Deputy Chief of Staff]] in the [[Bush administration]]. Rove's longtime partnership with [[George W. Bush]] dates back to Bush's terms as [[governor]] of [[Texas]]. Rove ran both of Bush's campaigns for governor and for president.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rove's track to the top began early, when he dropped out of [[the University of Utah]] to work in the [[College Republican National Committee]]. He quickly demonstrated his political guile, including a teenage prank on a [[liberal]] opponent using the man's letterhead[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/campaigns/wh2000/stories/rove072399.htm].[http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1165126,00.html].&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Rove's personal theme song is Jack Palance's &amp;quot;The Meanest Man Who Ever Lived.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Stream_of_consciousness&amp;diff=37058</id>
		<title>Stream of consciousness</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Stream_of_consciousness&amp;diff=37058"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T02:36:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Steam of consciousness is a literary technique made popular by [[James Joyce]] and [[William Faulkner]] which consists of a rambling written series of thoughts and feelings by a character in a novel.  This developed based on interest in psychoanalysis.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canadian&amp;diff=37041</id>
		<title>Canadian</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Canadian&amp;diff=37041"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T02:33:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;A term used to describe a person, beer, or distinctive bacon from [[Canada]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Greece_(Country)&amp;diff=36772</id>
		<title>Greece (Country)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Greece_(Country)&amp;diff=36772"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T01:04:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Greece''' (Ελλάδα in Greek), officially the '''Hellenic Republic''', is a country in southeastern [[Europe]]. The current president of Greece is [[Karolos Papoulias]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Animal&amp;diff=36761</id>
		<title>Animal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Animal&amp;diff=36761"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T00:59:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;An '''animal''' is a beast that moves in the sea, land, or air. A&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Howard_Stern&amp;diff=36751</id>
		<title>Howard Stern</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Howard_Stern&amp;diff=36751"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T00:55:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Howard Stern is an American satellite radio personality, notable for his crude humor.  He is often referred to as a &amp;quot;shock jock.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Stern's show often has such guests as strippers, midgets, Star Trek fans,  pornography actors, regular actors, musicians and comedians.  Some of the more disgusting topics of the Stern show include details of homosexual practices, and talking or trying to talk female guests into disrobing, and of course constant flatus jokes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stern's shows have also featured political commentary.  He has supported both Republicans and Democrats and has strong libertarian tendencies.  He has been an ardent defender of the 1st Amendment and a critic of FCC regulation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Howard Stern divorced his wife Allison in 1998 and recently became engaged to his longtime girlfriend.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stern is a nonpracticing Jew.  Stern and his staff often mock religion and the show is widely considered inappropriate for children, due to inappropriate content (both related to religion and not).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Operation_Iraqi_Freedom&amp;diff=36595</id>
		<title>Operation Iraqi Freedom</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Operation_Iraqi_Freedom&amp;diff=36595"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T00:10:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''2003 Iraq War''' (3/20/2003-) is presently the largest war operation in the world, started when the United States and allies including the United Kingdom&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/11/20/prague.bush.nato/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; launched a combat operation against [[Iraq]], with the stated goal of deposing dictator [[Saddam Hussein]], locating [[Weapons of Mass Destruction|Weapons of Mass Destruction programs]] including &amp;quot;knowhow&amp;quot; to produce WMD and liberating the Iraqi people. The war is currently ongoing, and there exists a large debate over topics such as withdrawal of American forces and the role of nations in the region. The war is is crucial to the larger U.S. led [[War on Terrorism]].  The Administration has been widely criticized for supposed strategic blunders in the execution of the war, including the failure to have a post-invasion plan.{{fact}} The American left has been criticized for its objections to the execution of the war.{{fact}} The American public seems to share those objections and expressed them during the 2006 midterm elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iraqi Liberation===&lt;br /&gt;
Most Iraqis welcomed the American invasion and overthrow of Saddam Hussein, and in the proceeding months, were optimistic about their country's future. An 'American Enterprise'-'Wall Street Journal'-Zogby poll in September 2003 found that &amp;quot;Seven out of 10 say they expect their country and their personal lives will be better five years from now. On both fronts, 32% say things will become much better&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110003991&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Furthermore, in a March 2004 poll of Iraqis, the BBC found that Iraqis have great hope in a stable, unified government for their country, with 80% of respondents favoring a centralized state ruled form Baghdad. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3514504.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iraqi Resistance===&lt;br /&gt;
However, Iraqi opposition to the American presence, both politically and militarily, has gradually increased since 2003. A secret British Ministry of Defence poll conducted in late 2005 found that 82 percent of Iraqis were &amp;quot;strongly opposed&amp;quot; to the presence of Coalition soldiers in Iraq.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/23/wirq23.xml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The same poll found support for Iraqi rebels at 45%, rising to 65% in Maysan province, although a poll by the IRI in March 2006 found 78% of respondents answered that &amp;quot;violence is never acceptable&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iri.org/mena/iraq/pdfs/2006-04-27-Iraq%20poll%20March%20March.ppt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A poll commissioned by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes in the autumn of 2006 found that Iraqi support for anti-Coalition violence had risen to 61%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-09-27-iraqi-opinion_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Similarly, a [[U.S. State Department]] poll conducted in 2006 found that &amp;quot;two-thirds of Iraqis in Baghdad favor an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-09-27-iraqi-opinion_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians have fled to neighboring [[Jordan]] and [[Syria]] since the 2003 invasion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1966333,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the removal of Saddam, the United States has been in the middle of Arab Sunni and Arab Shia.  Among the Arab Shia majority, notably the [[Jaysh Al-Madhi]], have began to attack American and other coalition troops even while the coalition as been protecting the Arab Shia from Arab Sunni attacks.  Other Shia groups that have not attacked coalition forces but have rather pursued their own factional aims while relying on the US to ensure Shia majority rule.&lt;br /&gt;
To many if not most Arab Sunnis the US is viewed as the enemy because it supports Shia majority rule.  Though being a minority, the Sunni have traditionally ruled Iraq and view themselves  uniquely entitled to continue doing so.  Under Muslim law, only Muslims may rule a Muslim state, and the Shia are considered heretics and thus disqualified from leading the nation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Testimony of Edward N. Luttwak, Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate , Hearings on [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/congress/ts070123luttwak.pdf Securing America's Interest in Iraq], 23 January 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weapons of Mass Destruction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While massive stockpiles and production facilities of Iraq's WMD programs have not been located, persons associated with the programs have been detained and documents related to various programs have yet to be translated.  Only about one-third of 36 million captured pages have been examined by a linguist and a summary gist of the document prepared.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/scope.html Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD], 30 September 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Some believe the physical WMDs that had been produced prior to the invasion were smuggled out of the country, possibly to [[Syria]], before the onset of the war. Critics of the Administration insist Saddam Hussein had the country's stockpiles destroyed after the [[Gulf War|First Gulf War]], and that Iraq was at least a decade away from producing more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/rpt/iraqstatus/c20699.htm Iraq Weekly Status Report] U.S. Department of State.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Operation_Iraqi_Freedom&amp;diff=36593</id>
		<title>Operation Iraqi Freedom</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Operation_Iraqi_Freedom&amp;diff=36593"/>
		<updated>2007-03-15T00:09:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''2003 Iraq War''' (3/20/2003-) is presently the largest war operation in the world, started when a Coalition of the Willing drawn from [[NATO]] members including the United Kingdom&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/europe/11/20/prague.bush.nato/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; launched a combat operation against [[Iraq]], with the stated goal of deposing dictator [[Saddam Hussein]], locating [[Weapons of Mass Destruction|Weapons of Mass Destruction programs]] including &amp;quot;knowhow&amp;quot; to produce WMD and liberating the Iraqi people. The war is currently ongoing, and there exists a large debate over topics such as withdrawal of American forces and the role of nations in the region. The war is is crucial to the larger U.S. led [[War on Terrorism]].  The Administration has been widely criticized for supposed strategic blunders in the execution of the war, including the failure to have a post-invasion plan.{{fact}} The American left has been criticized for its objections to the execution of the war.{{fact}} The American public seems to share those objections and expressed them during the 2006 midterm elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iraqi Liberation===&lt;br /&gt;
Most Iraqis welcomed the American invasion and overthrow of Saddam Hussein, and in the proceeding months, were optimistic about their country's future. An 'American Enterprise'-'Wall Street Journal'-Zogby poll in September 2003 found that &amp;quot;Seven out of 10 say they expect their country and their personal lives will be better five years from now. On both fronts, 32% say things will become much better&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110003991&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Furthermore, in a March 2004 poll of Iraqis, the BBC found that Iraqis have great hope in a stable, unified government for their country, with 80% of respondents favoring a centralized state ruled form Baghdad. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3514504.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iraqi Resistance===&lt;br /&gt;
However, Iraqi opposition to the American presence, both politically and militarily, has gradually increased since 2003. A secret British Ministry of Defence poll conducted in late 2005 found that 82 percent of Iraqis were &amp;quot;strongly opposed&amp;quot; to the presence of Coalition soldiers in Iraq.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/23/wirq23.xml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The same poll found support for Iraqi rebels at 45%, rising to 65% in Maysan province, although a poll by the IRI in March 2006 found 78% of respondents answered that &amp;quot;violence is never acceptable&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iri.org/mena/iraq/pdfs/2006-04-27-Iraq%20poll%20March%20March.ppt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A poll commissioned by the University of Maryland's Program on International Policy Attitudes in the autumn of 2006 found that Iraqi support for anti-Coalition violence had risen to 61%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-09-27-iraqi-opinion_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Similarly, a [[U.S. State Department]] poll conducted in 2006 found that &amp;quot;two-thirds of Iraqis in Baghdad favor an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-09-27-iraqi-opinion_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians have fled to neighboring [[Jordan]] and [[Syria]] since the 2003 invasion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,,1966333,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the removal of Saddam, the United States has been in the middle of Arab Sunni and Arab Shia.  Among the Arab Shia majority, notably the [[Jaysh Al-Madhi]], have began to attack American and other coalition troops even while the coalition as been protecting the Arab Shia from Arab Sunni attacks.  Other Shia groups that have not attacked coalition forces but have rather pursued their own factional aims while relying on the US to ensure Shia majority rule.&lt;br /&gt;
To many if not most Arab Sunnis the US is viewed as the enemy because it supports Shia majority rule.  Though being a minority, the Sunni have traditionally ruled Iraq and view themselves  uniquely entitled to continue doing so.  Under Muslim law, only Muslims may rule a Muslim state, and the Shia are considered heretics and thus disqualified from leading the nation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Testimony of Edward N. Luttwak, Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate , Hearings on [http://www.csis.org/media/csis/congress/ts070123luttwak.pdf Securing America's Interest in Iraq], 23 January 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Weapons of Mass Destruction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While massive stockpiles and production facilities of Iraq's WMD programs have not been located, persons associated with the programs have been detained and documents related to various programs have yet to be translated.  Only about one-third of 36 million captured pages have been examined by a linguist and a summary gist of the document prepared.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd_2004/scope.html Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD], 30 September 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Some believe the physical WMDs that had been produced prior to the invasion were smuggled out of the country, possibly to [[Syria]], before the onset of the war. Critics of the Administration insist Saddam Hussein had the country's stockpiles destroyed after the [[Gulf War|First Gulf War]], and that Iraq was at least a decade away from producing more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.state.gov/p/nea/rls/rpt/iraqstatus/c20699.htm Iraq Weekly Status Report] U.S. Department of State.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sati&amp;diff=36546</id>
		<title>Sati</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sati&amp;diff=36546"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T23:55:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sati (also called suttee) is custom of Hinduism by which a widow kills herself at her husband’s funeral pyre. The practice probably originated sometime around A.D. 400.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Perseus&amp;diff=36534</id>
		<title>Perseus</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Perseus&amp;diff=36534"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T23:52:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Perseus is the code name for a scientist who passed secrets to the communist Soviet Union beginning in 1943 in Los Alamos on the [[Manhattan Project]], before the acknowledged spy [[Klaus Fuchs]] arrived, and continuing into the 1950s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lanl.gov/history/wartime/spies.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The SVR (KGB) Colonel Vladimir Chikov identified the existence of Perseus beginning in 1991 in Russian periodicals, and then in a book in 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://home.earthlink.net/~gwkern/books.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Greek mythology Perseus is a demigod and son of Zeus who slays Medusa and rescues Andromeda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Howard_Stern&amp;diff=36528</id>
		<title>Howard Stern</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Howard_Stern&amp;diff=36528"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T23:50:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Howard Stern is an American satellite radio personality, notable for his crude humor.  He is often referred to as a &amp;quot;shock jock.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Stern's show often has such guests as strippers, midgets, Star Trek fans,  pornography actors, regular actors, musicians and comedians.  Some of the more disgusting topics of the Stern show include details of homosexual practices, and talking or trying to talk female guests into disrobing, and of course constant flatus jokes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stern's shows have also featured political commentary.  He has supported both Republicans and Democrats and has strong libertarian tendencies.  He has been an ardent defender of the 1st Amendment and a critic of FCC regulation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Howard Stern divorced his wife Allison in 1998 and recently became engaged to his longtime girlfriend.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stern is a nonpracticing Jew.  It is important to note that Stern and his staff often mock God {{Needcite}} and the show is widely considered inappropriate for children, due to inappropriate content (both related to religion and not).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Luftwaffe&amp;diff=36508</id>
		<title>Luftwaffe</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Luftwaffe&amp;diff=36508"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T23:44:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Luftwaffe''' is the air force of [[Germany]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While many believe it to be a term used only during [[World War II]], the term had been used before, and after the war because it is the exact german translation of &amp;quot;Air Force&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:luftwaffebombing.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Luftwaffe&amp;diff=36507</id>
		<title>Luftwaffe</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Luftwaffe&amp;diff=36507"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T23:44:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:LuftwaffeBadge.jpg|thumb|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Luftwaffe''' is the air force of [[Germany]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While many believe it to be a term used only during [[World War II]], the term had been used before, and after the war because it is the exact german translation of &amp;quot;Air Force&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:luftwaffebombing.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Palestine&amp;diff=36482</id>
		<title>Palestine</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Palestine&amp;diff=36482"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T23:37:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Palestine is a region of the Middle East that is under illegal occupation by [[Israel]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1948 Jewish terrorist groups like the Irgun and the Stern Gang (predecessors of the current Israeli government) drove native Palestinians from their homes and lands, committing massacres and resulting in millions of refugees. Arabs in Haifa were literally 'driven into the sea' and drowned by the Jewish terrorist groups. The most infamous terrorist bombing occurred when Jewish terrorists blew up the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those Palestinians who were not murdered or driven into neighboring countries settled in the West Bank (which came under Jordanian control) and the Gaza Strip (under Egyptian control). Israel has made life as miserable for these people as possible since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The West Bank and the Gaza Strip have been under Israeli occupation since 1969. Israel has moved over 400,000 illegal settlers onto Palestinian territory, in direct violation of international law and the Geneva Conventions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are over 75 UN resolutions against Israel for illegal treatment of Palestinians and Lebanese however, Israel is protected from proper UN action by the US due to the Israeli lobby (AIPAC) paying millions of dollars in campaign contributions to US politicians. In addition the US has vetoed the last 30+ resolutions that would have held Israel accountable to the numerous war crimes that it commits against Palestinians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Israel currently holds over 300 Palestinian children and 900 Palestinian women illegally in Israeli prisons without benefit of trial or charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palestine, according to Christian eschatology, is the place of the [[Battle of Armageddon]] where [[Christ]] will return to the Earth to bring the [[Kingdom of Heaven]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Menachem_Begin&amp;diff=36355</id>
		<title>Menachem Begin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Menachem_Begin&amp;diff=36355"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T23:00:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Menachem Begin was the leader of Isreal during the Camp David Accords.  He and the Egyptian leader, Anwar el-Sadat, negotiated a peace treaty at Camp David together.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Half-life&amp;diff=36348</id>
		<title>Half-life</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Half-life&amp;diff=36348"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T22:59:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The time it takes for half of the original sample of a radioactive isotope to decay.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wile, Dr. Jay L. ''Exploring Creation With Physical Science''. Apologia Educational Ministries, Inc. 1999, 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Secular scientists and Old Earth Creationists believe that half-lives are constant over time while [[Young-Earth Creationists]] believe that half-lives are not constant because radiometric dating using half-life measurements indicate an Earth and Universe that are billions of years old.  However, there is no empirical evidence supporting this argument.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
Also a popular video game franchise.&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{stub}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&amp;diff=36342</id>
		<title>Talk:Intelligent design</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&amp;diff=36342"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T22:58:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;To avoid an edit war, I'll discuss the changes I made here before reintroducing them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Judge Jones speech: Jones is a Republican and a Christian, appointed by George W Bush. If we're going to count quoting him as 'liberal POV,' then perhaps we should make a list of conservatives who aren't conservative enough for conservapedia. Who wants to start?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the DI's publication list: the cited list contains 38 publications. That's assuming no duplication. It's also counting books, not just articles, and not all of the entries are peer-reviewed. That's not even considering the actual content of the articles, and whether any make a positive case for ID.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the DI's petition: it is neither designed for nor capable of measuring an increase in support for ID. The claim that scientific support for ID is 'steadily growing' is utterly unsupported. 700 is not 'broad support' in a community of tens of thousands. The petition is indeed open to mathematicians and engineers, as can be seen at the cited website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 'new scientific evidence' questioning evolution: far too strong a statement to be made without so much as a citation. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 14:39, 2 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The removal of reference to the Judge Jones speech was wrong and detracts from the authority of this site.  I will replace it unless a cogent reason for its removal is provided. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:00, 2 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Authority of this site? It's a laughing stock. &amp;quot;Design Theory has broad scientific support&amp;quot; indeed. What a joke! --[[User:John Galt|John Galt]] 17:52, 5 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since no one has even attempted to dispute my points, I'm going to go ahead and make the necessary changes. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 05:59, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Exactly why are you adding the liberal viewpoint as fact to the article? [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 17:05, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Perhaps you could start with the ''list of reasons above'', not to mention Conservapedia's first commandment. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 17:08, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Everything I added and subsequently restored is properly supported by proper ''conservative'' sources, which is more than I can say about your changes. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 17:23, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::&amp;quot;I'm right and you're wrong&amp;quot; does not constitute a rebuttal. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 17:31, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I simply wished to outline the reasons behind the changes I made. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Essentially, Intelligent Design, as is, can not be a scientific theory unless you can prove the existence of God with the scientific method. You can believe it, you could be right, but it is not science. This is the reason why the petition to have it taught in the science classroom was denied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proponents of intelligent design, such as Behe, always stress that the guiding intelligence is probably God, but that it doesn't have to be. This is necessary to ensure that intelligent can be viewed as science rather than religious dogma. [[User:Order|Order]] 10:20 (AEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you claim that intelligent design claims that the intelligent cause is God, you just reiterate to point which the Kitzmiller party in the Dover trial tried to make; namely that ID is religion and not science. ID proponents always claim with good reason that the intelligent cause is unknown. [[User:Order|Order]] 14:20 (AEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I eliminated the word &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot; in two places because it is not supported by facts and it is simply a POV word.  I also added the word &amp;quot;some&amp;quot; because obviously not all scientists are supporting ID - in fact, only a miniscule number of them are. --[[User:MoeLarryAndJesus|MoeLarryAndJesus]] 17:44, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot;? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a fair bit of edit war going on now over the word &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot;.  How are these things notable?  Why are they notable? The word adds nothing to the phrase &amp;quot;From 2001 to 2007 over 700 notable scientists&amp;quot; unless one can actually say what makes these scientists notable (beyond signing the manifesto). I strongly recommend its removal.  There is a difference between removing liberal bias and adding conservative bias. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 17:47, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree totally.  &amp;quot;Notable&amp;quot; means absolutely nothing in this context.  If someone wants to show me a list of Nobel Prize winning scientists who signed the document in question, I'd say &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot; was warranted.  It's not even a matter of &amp;quot;adding conservative bias&amp;quot; - it's just gibberish. --[[User:MoeLarryAndJesus|MoeLarryAndJesus]] 18:56, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Notable&amp;quot; stricken again.  It would be nice if the person who is reverting my edits would explain what purpose &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot; serves instead of just reverting without comment. --[[User:MoeLarryAndJesus|MoeLarryAndJesus]] 18:58, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&amp;diff=36337</id>
		<title>Intelligent design</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&amp;diff=36337"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T22:57:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Intelligent Design is the hypothesis that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, rather than natural processes, such as [[evolution]][http://www.discovery.org/csc/topQuestions.php]. The theory on intelligent design leaves the identity of the intelligent cause open, since this question is not accessible by scientific investigation [http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1341]. Many proponents however admit to believe the intelligent cause to be [[God]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To date there have been over forty peer-reviewed articles supporting Intelligent Design in such publications as the ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' and internationally respected scientific journals such as ''Rivista di Biologia.'' [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=2640]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Design Theory enjoys a small amount of stated support within the worldwide scientific community (creationist scientists report there is widespread discriminatory action against creationist scientists[http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v9/i2/suppression.asp]), but it is steadily growing. From 2001 to 2007 over 700 scientists had signed the pro-Intelligent Design manifesto ''A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism'' published by the leaders of the design movement, the Discovery Institute. [http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/] This is largely due to much new scientific evidence from many scientific disciplines such as cosmology, physics and biology.  This has caused some scientists to question the claim of the dominant scientific community that evolution is the best explanation for the origin of life and call for public school science students to study the evidence supporting it in greater detail. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent trial in Dover, Pennsylvania Judge John E. Jones III ruled that Intelligent Design was not valid science and &amp;quot;cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a speech to the Anti-Defamation League, Jones said that &amp;quot;had I decided the Dover matter in a different way, I would have then engaged in just the kind of judicial activism which critics decry,&amp;quot; stating that he was bound by &amp;quot;over a half century of strong legal precedents.&amp;quot;[http://www.adl.org/Civil_Rights/speech_judge_jones.asp]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is claimed that the ruling was made because science is dependent upon observable, empirical, measurable evidence. If a supreme being was responsible for the creation of life, this can not be scientifically proven. Thus, it has been claimed, Intelligent Design cannot be a scientific theory. However, as noted above, Intelligent Design as a scientific theory does not identify the source of the intelligence responsible for life forms.  If a supreme being was not responsible, it is claimed, Intelligent Design is a logical paradox: If intelligence is too complex a quality to have occurred by chance, what created the creating intelligence?  However, this may be countered by the argument that the creating intelligence has always existed, and did not have a creator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&amp;diff=36330</id>
		<title>Talk:Intelligent design</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&amp;diff=36330"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T22:56:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: /* &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot;? */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;To avoid an edit war, I'll discuss the changes I made here before reintroducing them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Judge Jones speech: Jones is a Republican and a Christian, appointed by George W Bush. If we're going to count quoting him as 'liberal POV,' then perhaps we should make a list of conservatives who aren't conservative enough for conservapedia. Who wants to start?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the DI's publication list: the cited list contains 38 publications. That's assuming no duplication. It's also counting books, not just articles, and not all of the entries are peer-reviewed. That's not even considering the actual content of the articles, and whether any make a positive case for ID.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the DI's petition: it is neither designed for nor capable of measuring an increase in support for ID. The claim that scientific support for ID is 'steadily growing' is utterly unsupported. 700 is not 'broad support' in a community of tens of thousands. The petition is indeed open to mathematicians and engineers, as can be seen at the cited website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 'new scientific evidence' questioning evolution: far too strong a statement to be made without so much as a citation. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 14:39, 2 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The removal of reference to the Judge Jones speech was wrong and detracts from the authority of this site.  I will replace it unless a cogent reason for its removal is provided. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:00, 2 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Authority of this site? It's a laughing stock. &amp;quot;Design Theory has broad scientific support&amp;quot; indeed. What a joke! --[[User:John Galt|John Galt]] 17:52, 5 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since no one has even attempted to dispute my points, I'm going to go ahead and make the necessary changes. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 05:59, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Exactly why are you adding the liberal viewpoint as fact to the article? [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 17:05, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Perhaps you could start with the ''list of reasons above'', not to mention Conservapedia's first commandment. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 17:08, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Everything I added and subsequently restored is properly supported by proper ''conservative'' sources, which is more than I can say about your changes. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 17:23, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::&amp;quot;I'm right and you're wrong&amp;quot; does not constitute a rebuttal. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 17:31, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I simply wished to outline the reasons behind the changes I made. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Essentially, Intelligent Design, as is, can not be a scientific theory unless you can prove the existence of God with the scientific method. You can believe it, you could be right, but it is not science. This is the reason why the petition to have it taught in the science classroom was denied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proponents of intelligent design, such as Behe, always stress that the guiding intelligence is probably God, but that it doesn't have to be. This is necessary to ensure that intelligent can be viewed as science rather than religious dogma. [[User:Order|Order]] 10:20 (AEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you claim that intelligent design claims that the intelligent cause is God, you just reiterate to point which the Kitzmiller party in the Dover trial tried to make; namely that ID is religion and not science. ID proponents always claim with good reason that the intelligent cause is unknown. [[User:Order|Order]] 14:20 (AEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I eliminated the word &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot; in two places because it is not supported by facts and it is simply a POV word.  I also added the word &amp;quot;some&amp;quot; because obviously not all scientists are supporting ID - in fact, only a miniscule number of them are. --[[User:MoeLarryAndJesus|MoeLarryAndJesus]] 17:44, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot;? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a fair bit of edit war going on now over the word &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot;.  How are these things notable?  Why are they notable? The word adds nothing to the phrase &amp;quot;From 2001 to 2007 over 700 notable scientists&amp;quot; unless one can actually say what makes these scientists notable (beyond signing the manifesto). I strongly recommend its removal.  There is a difference between removing liberal bias and adding conservative bias. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 17:47, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I agree totally.  &amp;quot;Notable&amp;quot; means absolutely nothing in this context.  If someone wants to show me a list of Nobel Prize winning scientists who signed the document in question, I'd say &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot; was warranted.  It's not even a matter of &amp;quot;adding conservative bias&amp;quot; - it's just gibberish. --[[User:MoeLarryAndJesus|MoeLarryAndJesus]] 18:56, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ernest_Hemingway&amp;diff=35959</id>
		<title>Ernest Hemingway</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Ernest_Hemingway&amp;diff=35959"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T21:48:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Ernest Hemingway was born in 1899 in Oak Park, [[Illinois]]. He was a famous author whose works included: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The Old Man and the Sea]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*''[[A Farewell to Arms]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The Sun Also Rises]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[For Whom the Bell Tolls]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Hills Like White Elephants]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[A Clean, Well-lighted Place]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He won a [[Nobel Prize]] for literature in 1954. In 1961 he committed [[suicide]], but was allowed a [[Roman Catholic]] burial, as they ruled he was not fully responsible for his actions due to a mental decline in the last months of his life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hemingway influenced American literature. He helped popularize a style of writing that featured plain language, short sentences, and clean, sparse prose. His writing frequently focused on American expatriates living in Europe or Africa. Leading characters are often very masculinized, somewhat alcoholic, and suffering from mental scars, but they are always in control of themselves. These characters are believed to be based on Hemingway himself.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biographies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nobel laureates in Literature]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Half-life&amp;diff=35952</id>
		<title>Half-life</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Half-life&amp;diff=35952"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T21:46:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The time it takes for half of the original sample of a radioactive isotope to decay.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wile, Dr. Jay L. ''Exploring Creation With Physical Science''. Apologia Educational Ministries, Inc. 1999, 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Secular scientists and Old Earth Creationists believe that half-lives are constant over time while [[Young-Earth Creationists]] believe that half-lives are not constant because radiometric dating using half-life measurements indicate an Earth and Universe that are billions of years old.  However, there is no empirical evidence supporting this argument.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
Also a popular video game franchise.&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{stub}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&amp;diff=35942</id>
		<title>Talk:Intelligent design</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&amp;diff=35942"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T21:44:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;To avoid an edit war, I'll discuss the changes I made here before reintroducing them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Judge Jones speech: Jones is a Republican and a Christian, appointed by George W Bush. If we're going to count quoting him as 'liberal POV,' then perhaps we should make a list of conservatives who aren't conservative enough for conservapedia. Who wants to start?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the DI's publication list: the cited list contains 38 publications. That's assuming no duplication. It's also counting books, not just articles, and not all of the entries are peer-reviewed. That's not even considering the actual content of the articles, and whether any make a positive case for ID.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the DI's petition: it is neither designed for nor capable of measuring an increase in support for ID. The claim that scientific support for ID is 'steadily growing' is utterly unsupported. 700 is not 'broad support' in a community of tens of thousands. The petition is indeed open to mathematicians and engineers, as can be seen at the cited website.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 'new scientific evidence' questioning evolution: far too strong a statement to be made without so much as a citation. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 14:39, 2 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The removal of reference to the Judge Jones speech was wrong and detracts from the authority of this site.  I will replace it unless a cogent reason for its removal is provided. --[[User:Horace|Horace]] 19:00, 2 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Authority of this site? It's a laughing stock. &amp;quot;Design Theory has broad scientific support&amp;quot; indeed. What a joke! --[[User:John Galt|John Galt]] 17:52, 5 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Since no one has even attempted to dispute my points, I'm going to go ahead and make the necessary changes. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 05:59, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Exactly why are you adding the liberal viewpoint as fact to the article? [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 17:05, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Perhaps you could start with the ''list of reasons above'', not to mention Conservapedia's first commandment. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 17:08, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Everything I added and subsequently restored is properly supported by proper ''conservative'' sources, which is more than I can say about your changes. [[User:Harpie snark|Harpie snark]] 17:23, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::&amp;quot;I'm right and you're wrong&amp;quot; does not constitute a rebuttal. [[User:Tsumetai|Tsumetai]] 17:31, 6 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I simply wished to outline the reasons behind the changes I made. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Essentially, Intelligent Design, as is, can not be a scientific theory unless you can prove the existence of God with the scientific method. You can believe it, you could be right, but it is not science. This is the reason why the petition to have it taught in the science classroom was denied.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proponents of intelligent design, such as Behe, always stress that the guiding intelligence is probably God, but that it doesn't have to be. This is necessary to ensure that intelligent can be viewed as science rather than religious dogma. [[User:Order|Order]] 10:20 (AEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you claim that intelligent design claims that the intelligent cause is God, you just reiterate to point which the Kitzmiller party in the Dover trial tried to make; namely that ID is religion and not science. ID proponents always claim with good reason that the intelligent cause is unknown. [[User:Order|Order]] 14:20 (AEST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I eliminated the word &amp;quot;notable&amp;quot; in two places because it is not supported by facts and it is simply a POV word.  I also added the word &amp;quot;some&amp;quot; because obviously not all scientists are supporting ID - in fact, only a miniscule number of them are. --[[User:MoeLarryAndJesus|MoeLarryAndJesus]] 17:44, 14 March 2007 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&amp;diff=35932</id>
		<title>Intelligent design</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&amp;diff=35932"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T21:42:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Intelligent Design is the hypothesis that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, rather than natural processes, such as [[evolution]][http://www.discovery.org/csc/topQuestions.php]. The theory on intelligent design leaves the identity of the intelligent cause open, since this question is not accessible by scientific investigation [http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1341]. Many proponents however admit to believe the intelligent cause to be [[God]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To date there have been over forty peer-reviewed articles supporting Intelligent Design in such publications as the ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' and internationally respected scientific journals such as ''Rivista di Biologia.'' [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=2640]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Design Theory enjoys a small amount of stated support within the worldwide scientific community (creationist scientists report there is widespread discriminatory action against creationist scientists[http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v9/i2/suppression.asp]), but it is steadily growing. From 2001 to 2007 over 700 scientists had signed the pro-Intelligent Design manifesto ''A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism'' published by the leaders of the design movement, the Discovery Institute. [http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/] This is largely due to much new scientific evidence from many scientific disciplines such as cosmology, physics and biology.  This has caused some scientists to question the claim of the dominant scientific community that evolution is the best explanation for the origin of life and call for public school science students to study the evidence supporting it in greater detail. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent trial in Dover, Pennsylvania Judge John E. Jones III ruled that Intelligent Design was not valid science and &amp;quot;cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a speech to the Anti-Defamation League, Jones said that &amp;quot;had I decided the Dover matter in a different way, I would have then engaged in just the kind of judicial activism which critics decry,&amp;quot; stating that he was bound by &amp;quot;over a half century of strong legal precedents.&amp;quot;[http://www.adl.org/Civil_Rights/speech_judge_jones.asp]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is claimed that the ruling was made because science is dependent upon observable, empirical, measurable evidence. If a supreme being was responsible for the creation of life, this can not be scientifically proven. Thus, it has been claimed, Intelligent Design cannot be a scientific theory. However, as noted above, Intelligent Design as a scientific theory does not identify the source of the intelligence responsible for life forms.  If a supreme being was not responsible, it is claimed, Intelligent Design is a logical paradox: If intelligence is too complex a quality to have occurred by chance, what created the creating intelligence?  However, this may be countered by the argument that the creating intelligence has always existed, and did not have a creator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&amp;diff=35920</id>
		<title>Intelligent design</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Intelligent_design&amp;diff=35920"/>
		<updated>2007-03-14T21:38:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MoeLarryAndJesus: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Intelligent Design is the hypothesis that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, rather than natural processes, such as [[evolution]][http://www.discovery.org/csc/topQuestions.php]. The theory on intelligent design leaves the identity of the intelligent cause open, since this question is not accessible by scientific investigation [http://www.ideacenter.org/contentmgr/showdetails.php/id/1341]. Many proponents however admit to believe the intelligent cause to be [[God]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To date there have been over forty peer-reviewed articles supporting Intelligent Design in such publications as the ''Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington'' and internationally respected scientific journals such as ''Rivista di Biologia.'' [http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=2640]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Design Theory enjoys a small amount of stated support within the worldwide scientific community (creationist scientists report there is widespread discriminatory action against creationist scientists[http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v9/i2/suppression.asp]), but it is steadily growing. From 2001 to 2007 over 700 scientists had signed the pro-Intelligent Design manifesto ''A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism'' published by the leaders of the design movement, the Discovery Institute. [http://www.dissentfromdarwin.org/] This is largely due to much new scientific evidence from many scientific disciplines such as cosmology, physics and biology.  This has caused a relative few scientists to question the claim of the dominant scientific community that evolution is the best explanation for the origin of life and call for public school science students to study the evidence supporting it in greater detail. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent trial in Dover, Pennsylvania Judge John E. Jones III ruled that Intelligent Design was not valid science and &amp;quot;cannot uncouple itself from its creationist, and thus religious, antecedents&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a speech to the Anti-Defamation League, Jones said that &amp;quot;had I decided the Dover matter in a different way, I would have then engaged in just the kind of judicial activism which critics decry,&amp;quot; stating that he was bound by &amp;quot;over a half century of strong legal precedents.&amp;quot;[http://www.adl.org/Civil_Rights/speech_judge_jones.asp]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is claimed that the ruling was made because science is dependent upon observable, empirical, measurable evidence. If a supreme being was responsible for the creation of life, this can not be scientifically proven. Thus, it has been claimed, Intelligent Design cannot be a scientific theory. However, as noted above, Intelligent Design as a scientific theory does not identify the source of the intelligence responsible for life forms.  If a supreme being was not responsible, it is claimed, Intelligent Design is a logical paradox: If intelligence is too complex a quality to have occurred by chance, what created the creating intelligence?  However, this may be countered by the argument that the creating intelligence has always existed, and did not have a creator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MoeLarryAndJesus</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>