<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Masonwheeler</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Masonwheeler"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Masonwheeler"/>
	<updated>2026-11-12T01:58:14Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Libertarianism&amp;diff=288885</id>
		<title>Libertarianism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Libertarianism&amp;diff=288885"/>
		<updated>2007-09-08T18:38:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Masonwheeler: Removed a broken link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Libertarianism''' is a [[Political Philosophy|political philosophy]] emphasizing ''liberty'' and ''property''. A libertarian believes in minimizing or entirely eliminating government interventionism in all aspects of life; including economic, personal and in foreign policy matters. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Libertarians are neither. Unlike liberals or conservatives, Libertarians advocate a high degree of both personal and economic liberty. For example, Libertarians advocate freedom in economic matters, so we're in favor of lowering taxes, slashing bureaucratic regulation of business, and charitable -- rather than government -- welfare. But Libertarians are also socially tolerant.  We won't demand laws or restrictions on other people who we may not agree because of personal actions or lifestyles. &lt;br /&gt;
Think of us as a group of people with a &amp;quot;live and let live&amp;quot; mentality and a balanced checkbook.&amp;quot; [http://www.lp.org/article_85.shtml] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Libertarian Philosophy ==&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians in America tend to be [[liberal]] on social issues but [[conservative]] on economic issues. Libertarians generally support the legalization of drugs, prostitution, same-sex marriage and [[abortion]].  They oppose restrictions on pornography.  However, they also oppose [[universal health care]], [[taxes]] and [[welfare state]]. They are strong supports of [[school choice]], and oppose continuing the [[public school]] system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians support an expansive view of liberty as the proper basis for organizing civil society.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Libertarianism is closely related to liberalism, if this word is interpreted according to its original meaning of '[[classical liberal|classical liberalism]]'.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They tend to define liberty as the freedom to do whatever one wishes up to the point that one's behavior begins to interfere with another's person or property through coercive means. At the point of interference, each party would become subject to certain principled rules for adjudicating disputes, generally accepting that one who has demonstrated a proven lack of respect for the rights of others should be subject to sanctions, including possible constraints on their freedom. They believe that liberty is the right of every individual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians generally defend the ideal of freedom from the perspective of how little one is constrained by authority, i.e., how much one is allowed to do (also referred to as negative liberty). This ideal is distinguished from a view of freedom focused on how much one is able to do (also called positive liberty).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Libertarian Factions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians tend to use the word &amp;quot;libertarian&amp;quot; (small &amp;quot;l&amp;quot;) to refer to the philosophy, and &amp;quot;Libertarian&amp;quot; (capital &amp;quot;L&amp;quot;) to refer to the party. Thus, more libertarians exist than members of the [[Libertarian Party]]. Two general factions exist in the libertarian movement. The first are those libertarians who apply the principles of right to person and property to an absolute. They believe that no person, group, or government is above the right to violate these two things. They thus believe that government itself is illegitimate because it violates person and property. These libertarians subscribe to [[anarcho-capitalism]], as first named by [[Murray N. Rothbard]]. They believe that law and security can be handled by private means in the free market. The other faction believes in a very limited government. They are often referred to as [[minarchists]]. Libertarian minarchists want the state to only enforce law and order but generally nothing else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians tend to view liberalism as a philosophy advocating less government interference in private morality and more government control of business, and view conservatism as a philosophy advocating more government interference in private morality and less government control of business, while they view libertarianism as advocating less government control in all areas. However, there have been fusionist attempts to mix libertarianism and with social conservatism. This is noted in particular by [[paleolibertarians]]. They believe that social conservatism is a natural entity in a free society, but do not believe that it can be enforced by state interventionism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Libertarian Thought in America ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neither the [[Democratic]] or the [[Republican]] [[parties]] are particularly well aligned with libertarian thought. While the Republican Party sometimes adopts libertarian-sounding rhetoric of small government in economic affairs, many libertarians see it as being a force that has increased government interventionism in these affairs. Libertarians generally, for example, are opposed to the [[USA PATRIOT Act]], which they believe increases government power and removes protections on the liberty and privacy of the public. Most conservatives, on the other hand, view it as a necessary government program and believe security to be more important than personal liberty and privacy. Libertarians point out that such a view contradicts those of the founding fathers, such as Benjamin Franklin, who  summarized it most eloquently, &amp;quot;Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.&amp;quot; Libertarians are also generally opposed to the [[Iraq War]], unlike the majority of conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While all libertarians agree in general on the principles of the desirability of maximizing individual liberty and avoiding excessive government interference with the operation of the free market, individual libertarians have opinions that differ wildly within these general principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The libertarian movement generally praises the [[United States Constitution]], regarding it as the proper scope of the national government. They believe that the Democratic and Republican parties have overstepped constitutional limits. Anarcho-capitalist libertarians, on the other hand, view the implementation of the constitution as the very reason the national government is the size it is today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notable Libertarians ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Christian libertarian Lord Acton referred to the philosopher/theologian [[Thomas Aquinas]] as &amp;quot;the first Whig&amp;quot; or classical liberal. Other libertarian-oriented historic figures would include [[Adam Smith]], [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[Alexis de Tocqueville]], Thomas Paine, [[John Locke]], [[Patrick Henry]], George Mason, [[Carl Menger]], [[C.S. Lewis]], [[Ludwig von Mises]], [[James Madison]], H. L. Mencken, Rose Wilder Lane, Albert Jay Nock, [[Frédéric Bastiat]], [[Herbert Spencer]], Richard Cobden, [[Henry David Thoreau]], and [[Hugo Grotius]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ron Paul]], 1988 Libertarian Party and 2008 Republican Party presidential candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The psychiatrist Thomas Szasz, opponent of the therapeutic state and compulsory mental institutionalization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nobel Laureate economists [[Milton Friedman]], [[F.A. Hayek]], [[Ronald Coase]], Gary Becker, James Buchanan, [[George Stigler]], and Vernon Smith.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The novelist [[Ayn Rand]] advocated a philosophy of ''Objectivism'', embodying some libertarian thought, although differing from libertarianism in many ways. Some of her novels, such as ''Atlas Shrugged'', have become icons of some people in the libertarian movement, while others find her materialism/atheism incompatible with moral ethics and natural rights and law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Murray N. Rothbard]] was nicknamed &amp;quot;Mr. Libertarian.&amp;quot; He brought life to the anarcho-capitalist movement. Rothbard was an economist of the [[Austrian School]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Robert A. Heinlein]], science fiction author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Penn and Teller]], stage magicians turned libertarian evangelicals preaching atheism and promoting libertarian philosophies, including controversial positions such as legalization of prostitution and drugs in their Showtime series, which sports a name that cannot for reasons of good taste be expressed here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Canadian rock band Rush, which has been together since 1968, often explores libertarian themes in their lyrics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humorist Dave Barry, actor/comedian Drew Carey, actor Denis Leary, former MTV VJ Lisa &amp;quot;Kennedy&amp;quot; Montgomery, actor Kurt Russell, investigative reporter [[John Stossel]], and the late rocker Frank Zappa have all referred to themselves as being aligned with or openly supporting the Libertarian Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.faqs.org/faqs/libertarian/faq/ Libertarian FAQ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://dmoz.org/Society/Politics/Liberalism/Libertarianism/ Open Directory libertarian links ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://chelm.freeyellow.com/black_index.html Black Libertarians]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://libertarianwiki.org/Main_Page Libertarian Wiki]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.l4l.org/ Libertarians for Life]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.independent.org/ The Independent Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mises.org/ Ludwig von Mises Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.fee.org/ Foundation for Economic Education]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Masonwheeler</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Politically_correct&amp;diff=288882</id>
		<title>Politically correct</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Politically_correct&amp;diff=288882"/>
		<updated>2007-09-08T18:26:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Masonwheeler: Corrected a bit of awkward grammar&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Politically correct language''', or ''political correctness'', consists of linguistic restrictions imposed by authorities or pressure groups, particularly by [[liberals]]. The modern politically correct movement began at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]], one of the most [[liberal]] institutions in the [[United States]]. George Orwell's ''Nineteen Eighty-Four'' famously incorporated the notion of limiting thought through language (see [[Newspeak]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]]s impose [[political correctness]] to prevent recognition of differences between men and women, religions, belief systems, and nationalities.  In the 1960s, [[feminists]] began to demand that the neutral pronouns ''he'', ''him'' and ''his'' be replaced with expressions like &amp;quot;he or she&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;him or her&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;them&amp;quot;, etc. This was part of their campaign to redefine the social roles traditionally associated with masculinity and femininity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other groups jumped on the political correctness bandwagon, with handicapped people dodging the kindly meant slogan, &amp;quot;Hire the handicapped&amp;quot;, and insisting that their condition was not abnormal. Rather, they were to be called, &amp;quot;differently abled&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Political correctness''' or '''P.C.''' eventually came to refer to the alteration of ones choice of words in order to avoid either offending a group of people or reinforcing a stereotype considered to be disadvantageous to the group.  More specifically, groups which (or whose putative &amp;quot;leaders&amp;quot; or other activists) claim some status as systemically oppressed or discriminated against will periodically attempt to change the terms by which they are referred to and demand that society as a whole change its usage of words as well. Although traditionally associated with the liberals and the political left, Political Correctness has been challenged by libertarian comedian Bill Mahr, by left wing comedians Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, and by some noted liberals such as Nat Hentoff, Richard Lamm, and the late Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of political correctness is the changing terminology used to described handicapped people.  In the past the term &amp;quot;crippled&amp;quot; was perfectly acceptable and not considered offensive.  At some point, somebody decided &amp;quot;crippled&amp;quot; was degrading and the preferred term changed to &amp;quot;handicapped&amp;quot;.  This, too, was eventually deemed offensive and &amp;quot;disabled&amp;quot; became the preferred term.  Today, &amp;quot;disabled&amp;quot; is now considered degrading and &amp;quot;differently abled&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;physically challenged&amp;quot; are now the politically correct terms.  The same can be said for the changing uses of terms for Black Americans:  &amp;quot;Negro&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;colored&amp;quot;, once perfectly acceptable terms, were declared degrading and offensive by some activists during the 1970s and &amp;quot;Afro-American&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Black&amp;quot; came into use, which in turn gave way to &amp;quot;[[African Americans|African-American]]&amp;quot;, and in broader usage, &amp;quot;people of color&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The distinction for example between &amp;quot;colored people&amp;quot; (1950s-60s usage) and &amp;quot;people of color&amp;quot; (today) is an important one which illustrates the basis of political correctness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The question of politically correct language has spilled over from the use of racially descriptive words and affected the use of traditional language.  In 1999, an aide to the mayor of Washington DC described a budget decision as &amp;quot;niggardly&amp;quot; (a word meaning &amp;quot;stingy,&amp;quot; unrelated to the racial slur).  The aide immediately came under criticism and was forced to resigned even though he had not said anything racially charged, though his name was cleared within a matter of days and was offered to return to his previous position. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/williams/williams020499.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As well as language, political correctness discourages the use of racial or stereotypes in fiction out of concern that these stereotypes may become self-perpetuating. For example, frequently seeing the image black gang-members decked out in gold chains, carrying guns and listening to rap may pressure young black people into seeing this lifestyle as the most 'acceptable' choice for their racial group. The common image of women-only occupations (nurses, secretaries, care workers, etc) and of men-only occupations (IT workers, military, machinery operators, etc) can discourage individuals of either gender from considering those occupations traditionally belonging to the other. Additionally films like &amp;quot;The Siege&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;True Lies&amp;quot; have been criticized by pro-Islamic groups as having Muslims portrayed as terrorists, despite the fact that most current terrorists are in fact Muslims.  Thus political correctness becomes the consideration of all public statements and media for their unintentional social impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Differing Opinions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demands for politically correct language usage are rooted in the notion widely promoted among left-wing academics and sociologists that Western culture promotes systemic oppression against some groups by marginalizing them and excluding them from the &amp;quot;norm&amp;quot;; the groups thus supposedly systemically marginalized are referred to as &amp;quot;the Other&amp;quot; by these left-wing academics.{{fact}}  The implication is that these groups are systemically excluded from the mainstream.  &amp;quot;Colored people&amp;quot; is therefore deemed offensive because the order of words puts &amp;quot;colored&amp;quot; first, emphasizing their difference from the mainstream, while &amp;quot;people of color&amp;quot; is acceptable because putting the term &amp;quot;people&amp;quot; first emphasizes that they are people and thus does not emphasize their difference from the &amp;quot;norm&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some people allege that instead of encouraging supposedly marginalized groups to integrate with and assimilate into the mainstream of Western culture, political correctness ironically encourages them to emphasize and indeed to wallow in their marginalization from society, and to make a public display of such.  This is known as [[identity politics]].  According to this view, gays and lesbians are therefore encouraged to label themselves as &amp;quot;queer&amp;quot; and make public displays of &amp;quot;queerness&amp;quot; calculated to disturb the sensibilities of mainstream people, rather than integrate into the mainstream themselves;{{fact}} Black Americans are encouraged to adopt [[Afrocentrism]] and convert to [[Islam]] or to conform to stereotypical black behavior, etc.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Language Police==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative scholar [[Robert Bork]] has charged that the educational system is a battleground where the future of America is being undermined and ill-served. He has counseled against the troubles which will ensue as a result of anti-religious policies in the schools, permissive attitudes toward homosexuality and abortion, as well as welfare policies that have destroyed families since [[Lyndon B. Johnson]]'s War on Poverty. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline. by Robert Bork published by Harper Collins (c) 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In her book &amp;quot;[[The Language Police]]&amp;quot;, [[Diane Ravitch]] documents just how easy it is to get a word, phrase or idea banned from modern textbooks and references.  Textbook producers are beholden to small non-elected educational boards in a few key states such as New York or California. Few citizens know anything about these boards or who holds the seats of power on these boards. It's not a difficult for an interest group to mobilize a campaign to bombard the educational board. Meanwhile, the public is not even aware that their words or values are under attack. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then, once a big state makes a textbook purchase, it's very difficult for a small state or any municipality to make any changes.  Thus, profound changes can be inserted into textbooks and reference books by putting pressure on a handful of educational administrators. The work of textbook selection committee's is done privately, to avoid politicizing textbooks, but the reverse has happened. It's easier to pressure a lawmaker who is not beholden to community standards, but instead is enamored with political correctness. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Children Learn by [[Diane Ravitch]] (c) 2003 published by Knopf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ravitch has documented &amp;quot;''bias guidelines''&amp;quot; for major publishers of texts and tests. These &amp;quot;guidelines&amp;quot; consist of advice to writers and editors about words and topics that must be avoided.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110003695&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Totalitarianism and Political Correctness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comprehensive and detailed control of all ideas, beliefs, and statements is one of the most problematic features of [[totalitarian]] regimes.[http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-3816(196002)22%3A1%3C68%3ATIAP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-W]  This could be viewed as an argument for or against the politically correct use of language, depending on one's perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Postmodernism]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.capc.co.uk The Campaign Against Political Correctness]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://books.google.com/books?id=8olE_futZogC&amp;amp;pg=PA378&amp;amp;lpg=PA378&amp;amp;dq=communist+%22socially+correct%22&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=DYD85Lsf1G&amp;amp;sig=pkoUxDOLFJZsme40QO13zakFZw4 The Chinese Have A Word For It]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Masonwheeler</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>