<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=MWS</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=MWS"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/MWS"/>
	<updated>2026-10-01T05:37:01Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=905082</id>
		<title>User talk:MWS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=905082"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T21:59:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /* Links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about blocking you. I realized I made a mistake as soon as I saw your contributions. It's just that often spammers will fill their userpages with external links. Welcome to Conservapedia, though!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 22:35, 26 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't want to disturb here! I just registrate for fixing a little mistake in writing.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What I'm doing here ==&lt;br /&gt;
I came here around, becase I'm hoster of an antifeminist (german) website and editor in a wiki-encyclopedia (WikiMANNia), that is antifeminist too. At the moment I try to launch an english version of WikiMANNia and for this I'm looking for what is going on in USA and so I found your site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this way, I inserted two articles in german WikiMANNia, as you can see on my user page. I tried to translate the article about conservapedia into english, but my english is not really perfect. You may have a look for mistake in writing? Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our main topics in WikiMANNia are: Critics on Feminism, Antifeminism, Discrimination against Men, Preferential treatment of Women, Genderism, Family, Destruccion of Familys, Divorce, Family law, Newspeach, Femispeach, Genderspeach and some topics around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will look around in Conservapedia and hope to find good material for our work. --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Translations ==&lt;br /&gt;
I need some keywords (for better searching) in english:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Familienzerstörer&lt;br /&gt;
: Destroyer of Families&lt;br /&gt;
; Familienzerstörunf&lt;br /&gt;
: Destruccion of Families&lt;br /&gt;
; Feminismuskritik&lt;br /&gt;
: Critic on Feminism&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenbevorzugung&lt;br /&gt;
: Preferential treatment of Women&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenförderung&lt;br /&gt;
: The political motivated Promotion of Women&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenquote&lt;br /&gt;
: female quota, women's quota, quota of women&lt;br /&gt;
; Genderismus&lt;br /&gt;
: Genderism, Ideology of Gender Mainstream&lt;br /&gt;
; Helferinnenindustrie&lt;br /&gt;
: The business of the helper, the industrie of helping, make money with so called victims and discriminated.&lt;br /&gt;
; Lila Pudel&lt;br /&gt;
: A man supporting the &amp;quot;ideology of feminism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
; Männerbenachteiligung&lt;br /&gt;
: Discrimination against Men&lt;br /&gt;
; Opferkultur&lt;br /&gt;
: The Culture of the Victims: The Helferinnenindustrie promotes this culture to see everywhere victims and generate more victims by declaring them victims (or discriminated) for getting more benefit of the business.&lt;br /&gt;
; Scheidungswaise&lt;br /&gt;
: Ohrpan by divorce, the fate of a child loosing his mother or (most often) his father due to the divorce of its parents&lt;br /&gt;
; Unterhaltsmaximierungsprinzip&lt;br /&gt;
: Principle of maximize the Alimony by Lawmaker, Feminists and Judges.&lt;br /&gt;
; Wechselmodell &lt;br /&gt;
: Custody for divorced parent: Caring of the Child 50:50 by mother AND father also AFTER Divorce.&lt;br /&gt;
; Neusprech&lt;br /&gt;
: Newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
; Femisprech&lt;br /&gt;
: Femispeak&lt;br /&gt;
; Gläserne Decke&lt;br /&gt;
: Glass ceiling&lt;br /&gt;
; Gläserner Keller&lt;br /&gt;
: Glass cellar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Newspeak&amp;quot; is probably better than &amp;quot;Newspeach&amp;quot; - if you mean it in the 1984 sense. [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:25, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Yes, of course. Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is where in USA a specific word for &amp;quot;masculine feminism-defender&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;feminism-supporter&amp;quot; what we called in Germany a &amp;quot;Lila Pudel&amp;quot;? --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 12:53, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Information wanted ==&lt;br /&gt;
Do you have any articles about:&lt;br /&gt;
* Antifeminism&lt;br /&gt;
* Basic doctrines of feminism&lt;br /&gt;
* Women's quota&lt;br /&gt;
* Women in the army&lt;br /&gt;
* Fathers 4 Justice&lt;br /&gt;
* Glass ceiling&lt;br /&gt;
* Glass cellar&lt;br /&gt;
* False charges (Case Kachelmann, Dominique Strauss-Kahn)&lt;br /&gt;
* Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS)&lt;br /&gt;
or something related? --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 13:16, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please explain the links you are inserting - my computer suggest they are suspicious and won't let me open the page. Also, German language sites are not appropriate for an English wiki. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:53, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, if there is no interest on international networking I will stop it. Thank for the advice! --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 17:56, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: Addition: An english version has started (en.wikimannia.org) but has actually still no content. We are an antifemist group and insterested in international connections. --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 17:59, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=905077</id>
		<title>User talk:MWS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=905077"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T21:56:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /* Links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about blocking you. I realized I made a mistake as soon as I saw your contributions. It's just that often spammers will fill their userpages with external links. Welcome to Conservapedia, though!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 22:35, 26 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't want to disturb here! I just registrate for fixing a little mistake in writing.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What I'm doing here ==&lt;br /&gt;
I came here around, becase I'm hoster of an antifeminist (german) website and editor in a wiki-encyclopedia (WikiMANNia), that is antifeminist too. At the moment I try to launch an english version of WikiMANNia and for this I'm looking for what is going on in USA and so I found your site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this way, I inserted two articles in german WikiMANNia, as you can see on my user page. I tried to translate the article about conservapedia into english, but my english is not really perfect. You may have a look for mistake in writing? Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our main topics in WikiMANNia are: Critics on Feminism, Antifeminism, Discrimination against Men, Preferential treatment of Women, Genderism, Family, Destruccion of Familys, Divorce, Family law, Newspeach, Femispeach, Genderspeach and some topics around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will look around in Conservapedia and hope to find good material for our work. --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Translations ==&lt;br /&gt;
I need some keywords (for better searching) in english:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Familienzerstörer&lt;br /&gt;
: Destroyer of Families&lt;br /&gt;
; Familienzerstörunf&lt;br /&gt;
: Destruccion of Families&lt;br /&gt;
; Feminismuskritik&lt;br /&gt;
: Critic on Feminism&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenbevorzugung&lt;br /&gt;
: Preferential treatment of Women&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenförderung&lt;br /&gt;
: The political motivated Promotion of Women&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenquote&lt;br /&gt;
: female quota, women's quota, quota of women&lt;br /&gt;
; Genderismus&lt;br /&gt;
: Genderism, Ideology of Gender Mainstream&lt;br /&gt;
; Helferinnenindustrie&lt;br /&gt;
: The business of the helper, the industrie of helping, make money with so called victims and discriminated.&lt;br /&gt;
; Lila Pudel&lt;br /&gt;
: A man supporting the &amp;quot;ideology of feminism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
; Männerbenachteiligung&lt;br /&gt;
: Discrimination against Men&lt;br /&gt;
; Opferkultur&lt;br /&gt;
: The Culture of the Victims: The Helferinnenindustrie promotes this culture to see everywhere victims and generate more victims by declaring them victims (or discriminated) for getting more benefit of the business.&lt;br /&gt;
; Scheidungswaise&lt;br /&gt;
: Ohrpan by divorce, the fate of a child loosing his mother or (most often) his father due to the divorce of its parents&lt;br /&gt;
; Unterhaltsmaximierungsprinzip&lt;br /&gt;
: Principle of maximize the Alimony by Lawmaker, Feminists and Judges.&lt;br /&gt;
; Wechselmodell &lt;br /&gt;
: Custody for divorced parent: Caring of the Child 50:50 by mother AND father also AFTER Divorce.&lt;br /&gt;
; Neusprech&lt;br /&gt;
: Newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
; Femisprech&lt;br /&gt;
: Femispeak&lt;br /&gt;
; Gläserne Decke&lt;br /&gt;
: Glass ceiling&lt;br /&gt;
; Gläserner Keller&lt;br /&gt;
: Glass cellar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Newspeak&amp;quot; is probably better than &amp;quot;Newspeach&amp;quot; - if you mean it in the 1984 sense. [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:25, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Yes, of course. Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is where in USA a specific word for &amp;quot;masculine feminism-defender&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;feminism-supporter&amp;quot; what we called in Germany a &amp;quot;Lila Pudel&amp;quot;? --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 12:53, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Information wanted ==&lt;br /&gt;
Do you have any articles about:&lt;br /&gt;
* Antifeminism&lt;br /&gt;
* Basic doctrines of feminism&lt;br /&gt;
* Women's quota&lt;br /&gt;
* Women in the army&lt;br /&gt;
* Fathers 4 Justice&lt;br /&gt;
* Glass ceiling&lt;br /&gt;
* Glass cellar&lt;br /&gt;
* False charges (Case Kachelmann, Dominique Strauss-Kahn)&lt;br /&gt;
* Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS)&lt;br /&gt;
or something related? --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 13:16, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please explain the links you are inserting - my computer suggest they are suspicious and won't let me open the page. Also, German language sites are not appropriate for an English wiki. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:53, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
: OK, if there is no interest on international networking I will stop it. Thank for the advice! --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 17:56, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminism&amp;diff=905076</id>
		<title>Feminism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminism&amp;diff=905076"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T21:54:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /+ External links */ +1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Braque woman 400pix.jpg|thumb|200px|''Woman with a guitar'' by [[Georges Braque]], 1913.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Feminism''' originally was an expression used by [[suffragettes]] -who were predominantly [[pro-life]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.godlessprolifers.org/library/wallace4.html ''Susan B. Anthony opposed abortion'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;There is no question that she deplored the practice of abortion, as did every one of her colleagues in the suffrage movement.&amp;quot;'' [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/13/opinion/13schiff.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin ''Desperately Seeking Susan''] [[New York Times]] (13 October 2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.feministsforlife.org/history/foremoth.htm ''Voices of our Feminist Foremothers''] Feminists for Life&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;- to obtain the right for women to vote in the early 1900s in the [[United States]] and the [[United Kingdom]].  By the 1970s, however, [[liberals]] had changed the meaning to represent people who favored [[abortion]] and identical roles or quotas for women in the military and in society as a whole.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, a modern feminist denies or downplays differences between men and women, opposes the encouragement of homemaking and child-rearing for women, and seeks to participate in predominantly male activities.  Modern feminists:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* never wanted gender equality; they want power for the female left&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2011/feb11/11-02-11.html Phyllis Schlafly, &amp;quot;Feminism Has Become a Hot Topic&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* in movies, falsely portray the men as inherently evil, dumb or incompetent, and the women as inherently good, smart or competent (note that this conflicts with gender equality)&lt;br /&gt;
* pretend that there are no meaningful differences between men and women when that advances [[liberal]] causes (e.g., women and men equally in military combat, to weaken the U.S. military), but reject equality when that results in more money to women (e.g., [[VAWA]] funding of women's groups)&lt;br /&gt;
* oppose [[chivalry]] and even feign insult at harmless displays of it (see battle between the sexes)&lt;br /&gt;
* view traditional [[marriage]] as unacceptably patriarchal&lt;br /&gt;
* belittle and mock other women who desire to have children or raise a family&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/etc/03261992.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Being a [[housewife]] is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family-maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of  [[radical feminism]] is to change that.&amp;quot; - Vivian Gornick, University of Illinois, &amp;quot;The Daily Illini,&amp;quot; April 25, 1981. [http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/LAF_Theme_Articles_13/You_Don_t_Know_Feminism_744100744.shtml         &amp;quot;You Don't Know Feminism&amp;quot;] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* shirk traditional gender activities, like baking&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;But sometime between the Ides of March and Canada Day, I remembered that I'd given up baking cookies as a political act in 1975. ... No self-respecting feminist could be found in the company of cookie dough.&amp;quot; [http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&amp;amp;id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* support [[affirmative action]] for women&lt;br /&gt;
* prefer that women wear pants rather than dresses, presumably because men do&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[T]he wearing of pantsuits is often a useful feminism signifier, depending on the culture of the law firm.&amp;quot; [http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=2640]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;I was part of a growing tribe of pesky women called feminists by friends and enemies alike.  We women stormed out the door in our imitation men's suits ....&amp;quot; [http://www.canada.com/ottawacitizen/news/arts/story.html?k=60432&amp;amp;id=3b3c71f6-0d7d-4e1a-b8fb-cf8d5b1af478]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* seek [[women in combat]] in the military just like men, and coed submarines&lt;br /&gt;
* refuse to take her husband's last name when marrying&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;(Almost half the married women in the Harvard-Radcliffe class of 1990 kept or hyphenated their names.) If you read the New York Times wedding pages, and shut up, you do, the phrase 'the bride, who is keeping her name' seems like the norm, unless his name is Rockefeller. http://dir.salon.com/story/mwt/feature/2003/10/16/names/index.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* believe marriage implies female servitude when it is in fact a mutual bond&lt;br /&gt;
* distort historical focus onto female figures, often overshadowing important events (Eg: Henry VIII's wives take precedence in common knowledge to his actual reign.)&lt;br /&gt;
* object to being addressed as &amp;quot;ma'am,&amp;quot; or feminine nicknames such as &amp;quot;sweetheart&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;honey&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-talk-boxer-maamjun19,0,5804401.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; object to other female-only names, such as &amp;quot;temptress&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* take offense at grammatical rules of the English language, like using the pronoun &amp;quot;he&amp;quot; when referring to a hypothetical/anonymous person, or phrases like 'fireman' and 'stewardess.'&lt;br /&gt;
* support of the [[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
Roots of the movement in the United States and the United Kingdom include the [[suffrage|Women's Suffrage]] movement of the early 1900s and the Women's Liberation (or &amp;quot;Second Wave Feminist&amp;quot;) movement of the 1960s and 1970s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Equal Rights Amendment]], which proponents claimed would address the inadequacies of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] concerning women and citizenship, was proposed in the US in 1923.  The amendment passed Congress in 1972 but was ultimately defeated, falling just three states short of the required [[three-quarters majority]] on June 30, 1982. Some conservatives, particularly [[Phyllis Schlafly]], felt that its passage would entail adverse consequences, including making girls subject to the [[military draft]], requiring taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] the end of [[single-sex schools]] and classes, requiring the issuance of [[homosexual marriage]] licenses, and the revocation of laws that protect women in dangerous jobs, such as factory or mining work.  Indeed, in states that passed their own state versions of ERA, several of these results were subsequently ordered by courts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the [[Hawaii]] and [[Massachusetts]] Supreme Courts ordered the issuance of homosexual marriage licenses based in part on their on their state ERAs, and the [[New Mexico]] Supreme Court ordered taxpayer-funded [[abortion]] based on its state ERA.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The feminist movement in the West evolved in the 1980s with the rise of so-called [[Post-Feminism]] (also called &amp;quot;[[Third-Wave]]&amp;quot; feminism), which stresses that women have many rights that go unrecognized, often by women themselves, in everyday life, and in the American legal structure. Most members of the feminist movement support reproductive rights currently guaranteed by American law, including the legal right to [[abortion]]. This stance is opposed by many conservatives, leading political commentator [[Rush Limbaugh]] to coin the term &amp;quot;Femi-nazis&amp;quot; to refer to extreme feminist activists. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the major features of feminism prior to the 1990s was opposition to women being treated as [[sex objects]]. However, feminists today support women being sex objects, viewing it as a means of empowerment over the traditional [[Judeo-Christian]] family structure and [[conservative values]]. Continuing this same promotion of [[liberalism]] and [[anti-Christian]] values, feminists today treat [[Women's rights and Islam|Islam's cruel treatment of women]] as a matter of &amp;quot;personal choice&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the administration of [[Bill Clinton]], feminism made a partial resurgence, although feminist leadership was criticized{{who}} for largely failing to criticize President Clinton's [[sexist]] behavior toward female employees as both Arkansas Governor and U.S. President.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Odone, Christina [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article528875.ece ''Left-wing misogyny is alive and well: The party’s feminist agenda allows Labour men to get away with sexist behaviour''] (2 June 2005) [[The Times]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, Candice E. ''&amp;quot;Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine&amp;quot;'' (World Ahead Publishing; 2005) ISBN 0-9746-7013-8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]], a staunch advocate of [[civil rights]] and [[non-violence]] said, &amp;quot;When a mother has to work she does violence to motherhood by depriving her children of her loving guidance and protection.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Stride Toward Freedom : The Montgomery Story'', Martin Luther King, Jr., Harper and Rowe, New York, 1958, p. 203.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Larrey Anderson, philosopher, writer and submissions editor for American Thinker, links feminism to Marxism, and concludes, &amp;quot;Feminism by grounding itself in the philosophy of Hegel and Marx, is condemning women to a new servitude: slavery to the state.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larrey Anderson, ''The Feminine Mistake'', American Thinker], November 29, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotations== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Robin Morgan]]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I feel that 'man-hating' is an honourable and viable political act, that the [[oppressed]] have a right to [[class-hatred]] against the class that is oppressing them.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/LGB.asp From] &amp;quot;Sisterhood is Powerful&amp;quot;(1970)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero-sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary-vested-interest-power. But then, I have great difficulty examining what men in general could possibly do about all this. In addition to doing the sh*twork that women have been doing for generations, possibly not exist? No, I really don't mean that. Yes, I really do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://circuitous.org/scraps/combahee.html From] her introduction to &amp;quot;Sisterhood is Powerful&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.feministcampus.org/network/chat/morgan04232003.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_/ai_n9357217 From] &amp;quot;Sisterhood is Powerful&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_199903/ai_n8831317 From] &amp;quot;Theory and Practice: Pornography and Rape&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Andrea Dworkin]]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LfaWZ&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/LGB.asp From] her book &amp;quot;Letters from a War Zone&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LfaWZ&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;In my own life, I don't have intercourse. That is my choice.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andrea Dworkin: [http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4024585,00.html &amp;quot;'They took my body from me and used it'&amp;quot;] (Guardian Unlimited)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Q: People think you are very hostile to men. A: &amp;quot;I am.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/WarZoneChaptIID.html &amp;quot;Nervous Interview&amp;quot;], 1978 (Background: &amp;quot;Norman Mailer managed to publish lots of interviews with himself, none of which made much sense, all of which were taken seriously by literati of various stripes. So this is half parody of him and his chosen form and half parody of myself and my chosen movement.&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Men use the night to erase us.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;TNaD&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.nostatusquo.com/ACLU/dworkin/WarZoneChaptIb.html The Night and Danger]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The annihilation of a woman's personality, individuality, will, character, is prerequisite to male sexuality.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;TNaD&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Marilyn French]]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Marilyn French.gif|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women ... he can sexually molest his daughters ... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE&amp;quot; - ''The War Against Women'', p. 182 (her emphasis)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/034538248X/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;All patriarchists exalt the home and family as sacred, demanding it remain inviolate from prying eyes. Men want privacy for their violations of women ... All women learn in childhood that women as a sex are men's prey&amp;quot; - ''The War Against Women'', p. 186 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/034538248X/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The media treat male assaults on women like rape, beating, and murder of wives and female lovers, or male incest with children, as individual aberrations ... obscuring the fact that all male violence toward women is part of a concerted campaign&amp;quot; - ''The War Against Women'', p. 21 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/034538248X/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====In fiction authored by [[Marilyn French]]====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter&amp;quot; - ''The Women's Room''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;All men are rapists and that's all they are&amp;quot; - The character Mia in her novel ''The Women's Room'', p. 462&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0345353617/ref=sib_dp_pt#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The nuclear family must be destroyed ... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process&amp;quot; - Linda Gordon &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women ... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men ... All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft&amp;quot; (from &amp;quot;The Declaration of Feminism&amp;quot; November, 1971) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The feminista agenda is not about equal rights for women. It is about a [[socialist]], anti-family political movement that encourages women to leave their husbands, [[abortion|kill their children]], practice [[witchcraft]], destroy capitalism, and become [[lesbian]]s&amp;quot; - Pat Robertson, fundraising letter, 1992&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gainesvillehumanists.org/patr.htm &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I'm furious with the Women's Liberationists. They keep getting up on soapboxes and proclaiming women are brighter than men. That's true, but it should be kept quiet or it ruins the whole racket&amp;quot; - Anita Loos &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex&amp;quot; - [[Valerie Solanas]], author of the SCUM Manifesto (Society for Cutting Up Men) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things&amp;quot; - Jilly Cooper&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage&amp;quot; - Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist&amp;quot; - Ti-Grace Atkinson &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice&amp;quot; - Ti-Grace Atkinson &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;It matters more what's in a woman's face than what's on it.&amp;quot; - Claudette Colbert, quoted in Kindling the Spirit by Lois P. Frankel &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear&amp;quot; - Susan Brownmiller; Authoress of Against Our Will p.6 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;When a woman reaches orgasm with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression&amp;quot; - Sheila Jeffrys &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;You grow up with your father holding you down and covering your mouth so another man can make a horrible searing pain between your legs&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon (Prominent legal feminist scholar; Universities of Michigan &amp;amp; Yale) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent&amp;quot; - Catharine MacKinnon, quoted in ''Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men&amp;quot; - Sharon Stone, Actress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Ninety-five percent of women's experiences are about being a victim. Or about being an underdog, or having to survive ... women didn't go to Vietnam and blow things up. They are not [[Rambo]]&amp;quot; - Jodie Foster, Actress - as quoted in The New York Times Magazine &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race&amp;quot; - Sally Miller Gearhart, in ''The Future - If There Is One - Is Female'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual (male), it may be mainly a quantitative difference&amp;quot; - Susan Griffin, Rape: The All-American Crime &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males&amp;quot; - Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If anyone is prosecuted for filing a false report, then victims of real attacks will be less likely to report them&amp;quot; - David Angier &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;To use the word [rape] carefully would be to be careful for the sake of the violator, and the survivors don't care a hoot about him. &amp;amp;hellip; They [men unjustly accused of rape] have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what they say I did?' Those are good questions.&amp;quot; - Catherine Comins, assistant dean of student life at Vassar in 1991 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,973077-6,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He's just incapable of it&amp;quot; - Barbara Jordan, former congresswoman &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Probably the only place where a man can feel really secure is in a maximum security prison, except for the imminent threat of release&amp;quot; - [[Germaine Greer]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Man-hating is everywhere, but everywhere it is twisted and transformed, disguised, tranquilized, and qualified. It coexists, never peacefully, with the love, desire, respect, and need women also feel for men. Always man-hating is shadowed by its milder, more diplomatic and doubtful twin, ambivalence&amp;quot; - [[Judith Levine]], Authoress &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I feel what they feel: man-hating, that volatile admixture of pity, contempt, disgust, envy, alienation, fear, and rage at men. It is hatred not only for the anonymous man who makes sucking noises on the street, not only for the rapist or the judge who acquits him, but for what the Greeks called philo-aphilos, 'hate in love' for the men women share their lives with - husbands, lovers, friends, fathers, brothers, sons, co-workers.&amp;quot; - [[Judith Levine]], Authoress of My Enemy, My love &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;There are no boundaries between affectionate sex and slavery in (the male) world. Distinctions between pleasure and danger are academic; the dirty-laundrylist of 'sex acts' ... includes rape, foot binding, fellatio, intercourse, auto eroticism, incest, anal intercourse, use and production of pornography, cunnilingus, sexual harassment, and murder&amp;quot; - Judith Levine; summarizing comment on the WAS document (A Southern Women's Writing Collective: Women Against Sex) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*((Delaney Nickerson, of the American Coalition for ABUSE AWARENESS, refers to the False Memory Syndrome Foundation as &amp;quot;The F---ing Molesters Society&amp;quot; (Miami Herald, April 3, 1995) The ACAA is a lobbying group, which includes Ellen Bass (co-author of THE COURAGE TO HEAL), and Rene Frederickson, leading feminist psychotherapist and strong proponent of repressed memory theory)) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*((At the STONE ANGELS satanic ritual abuse conference in Thunder Bay in February, 1995, the following was contained in the handouts at a conference supported financially by the Ontario Government: FMS stands for: FULL OF MOSTLY SH*T; FOR MORE SADISM; FELONS, MURDERERS, SCUMBALLS; FREQUENT MOLESTERS SOCIETY)) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Women have their faults / men have only two: / everything they say / everything they do&amp;quot; {{Fact|Date=March 2008}} -- Popular Feminist Graffiti &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I was, in reality, bred by my parents as my father's concubine... What we take for granted as the stability of family life may well depend on the sexual slavery of our children. What's more, this is a cynical arrangement our institutions have colluded to conceal&amp;quot; - Sylvia Fraser, Journalist &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Catharine MacKinnon]] maintains that &amp;quot;the private is a sphere of battery, marital rape and women's exploited labor.&amp;quot; In this way, privacy and family are reduced to nothing more than aspects of the master plan, which is male domination. Democratic freedoms and the need to keep the state's nose out of our personal affairs are rendered meaningless. The real reason our society cherishes privacy is because men have invented it as an excuse to conceal their criminality. If people still insist that the traditional family is about love and mutual aid - ideals which, admittedly, are sometimes betrayed - they're &amp;quot;hiding from the truth&amp;quot; The family isn't a place where battery and marital rape sometimes happen but where little else apparently does. Sick men don't simply molest their daughters, they operate in league with their wives to &amp;quot;breed&amp;quot; them for that purpose - Donna Laframboise; The Princess at the Window (in a critical explication of the Catharine MacKinnon, [[Gloria Steinem]] et al, tenets of misandric belief) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;If the classroom situation is very heteropatriarchal - a large beginning class of 50 to 60 students, say, with few feminist students - I am likely to define my task as largely one of recruitment ... of persuading students that women are oppressed&amp;quot; - Professor Joyce Trebilcot of Washington University, as quoted in Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Men, as a group, tend to be abusive, either verbally, sexually or emotionally. There are always the exceptions, but they are few and far between (I am married to one of them). There are different levels of violence and abuse and individual men buy into this system by varying degrees. But the male power structure always remains intact.&amp;quot; - Message on FEMISA, responding to a request for arguments that men are unnecessary for a child to grow into mature adulthood. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Another posting on FEMISA: &amp;quot;Considering the nature and pervasiveness of men's violence, I would say that without question, children are better off being raised without the presence of men. Assaults on women and children are mostly perpetrated by men whom they are supposed to love and trust: fathers, brothers, uncles, grandfathers, step-fathers.&amp;quot; (Both above quotes taken from Daphne Patai's excellent critical work, [[Heterophobia]]) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;At Brandies I discovered Feminism. And I instantly became a convert... writing brilliant papers in my Myths of Patriarchy class, in which I likened my fate as a woman to other victims throughout the ages.&amp;quot; {{fact}} - Heather Hart 7 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Here are 10 reasons why we are concerned about feminism and the National Organisation for Women &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. &amp;quot;The simple fact is that every woman must be willing to be identified as a lesbian to be fully feminist&amp;quot; - National NOW Times, January, 1988 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &amp;quot;Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage&amp;quot; - feminist leader Sheila Cronan &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. In response to a question concerning China's policy of compulsory abortion after the first child, Molly Yard responded, &amp;quot;I consider the Chinese government's policy among the most intelligent in the world&amp;quot; - Gary Bauer, &amp;quot;Abetting Coercion in China&amp;quot; The Washington Times, Oct. 10, 1989 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. &amp;quot;Overthrowing capitalism is too small for us. We must overthrow the whole ... patriarch!&amp;quot; - [[Gloria Steinem]], radical feminist leader, editor of Ms. Magazine &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. &amp;quot;Marriage has existed for the benefit of men; and has been a legally sanctioned method of control over women.... We must work to destroy it. The end of the institution of marriage is a necessary condition for the liberation of women. Therefore it is important for us to encourage women to leave their husbands and not to live individually with men ... All of history must be re-written in terms of oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft&amp;quot; (from &amp;quot;The Declaration of Feminism&amp;quot; November, 1971) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. &amp;quot;By the year 2000 we will, I hope, raise our children to believe in human potential, not God&amp;quot; - [[Gloria Steinem]], editor of Ms. Magazine) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. &amp;quot;Let's forget about the mythical Jesus and look for encouragement, solace, and inspiration from real women ... Two thousand years of patriarchal rule under the shadow of the cross ought to be enough to turn women toward the feminist 'salvation' of this world&amp;quot; - Annie Laurie Gaylor, &amp;quot;Feminist Salvation,&amp;quot; The Humanist, p. 37, July/August 1988 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. &amp;quot;In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them&amp;quot; - Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College, and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. &amp;quot;Being a housewife is an illegitimate profession... The choice to serve and be protected and plan towards being a family- maker is a choice that shouldn't be. The heart of radical feminism is to change that&amp;quot; - Vivian Gornick, feminist author, University of Illinois, The Daily Illini, April 25, 1981 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. &amp;quot;The most merciful thing a large family can to do one of its infant members is to kill it&amp;quot; - Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, in &amp;quot;Women and the New Race&amp;quot; p. 67 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Women's chains have been forged by men, not by anatomy.&amp;quot; - Estelle R. Ramey &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I would have girls regard themselves not as adjectives but as nouns.&amp;quot; - Elizabeth Cady Stanton, &amp;quot;Our Girls&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men&amp;quot; - [[Elizabeth Cady Stanton]], from her diary of December 27, 1890, quoting a letter she wrote. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://books.google.com/books?id=CIsEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA270&amp;amp;lpg=PA270&amp;amp;dq=%22we+are+as+a+sex+infinitely+superior+to+men%22&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=FqYVyWK-s6&amp;amp;sig=tnXoiGvopCcO1vFaoF7nmSvtXPM&amp;amp;hl=en#PPA270,M1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 'A feminist Dictionary; ed. Kramarae and Triechler, Pandora Press, 1985: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*MALE: ... represents a variant of or deviation from the category of female. The first males were mutants ... the male sex represents a degeneration and deformity of the female &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*MAN: ... an obsolete life form ... an ordinary creature who needs to be watched ...a contradictory baby-man ... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*TESTOSTERONE POISONING: ... 'Until now it has been though that the level of testosterone in men is normal simply because they have it. But if you consider how abnormal their behavior is, then you are led to the hypothesis that almost all men are suffering from &amp;quot;testosterone poisoning&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Letter to editor: &amp;quot;Women's Turn to Dominate&amp;quot; &amp;quot;... Clearly you are not yet a free-thinking feminist but rather one of those women who bounce off the male-dominated, male-controlled social structures. Who cares how men feel or what they do or whether they suffer? They have had over 2000 years to dominate and made a complete hash of it. Now it is our turn. My only comment to men is: if you don't like it, bad luck - and if you get in my way I'll run you down&amp;quot; Signed: Liberated Women, Boronia Herald-Sun, Melbourne, Australia. 9 February, 1996 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*“Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism” - Catharine MacKinnon&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The English novelist and critic [[Rebecca West]] said &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/rebecca_west.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; : &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;  &amp;quot;I myself have never been able to find out what feminism is; I only know that people call me a feminist whenever I express sentiments that differentiate me from a doormat or a prostitute.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti-Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminism and housewives]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist style]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gender equality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gender police]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminists for Life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminism and reason]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Battered woman syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|small}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* WikiMANNia: [http://wikimannia.org/Feminismus Feminismus], [http://wikimannia.org/Feminismuskritik Feminismuskritik] (german)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/ The Feminist eZine] Archive of articles about Feminist History.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cia-on-campus.org/surveil/steinem.html Gloria Steinem and the CIA], ''The New York Times'', February 21, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg02217.html Inside the CIA with Gloria Steinem], Nancy Borman,  ''The Village Voice''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.american.com/archive/2008/march-april-magazine-contents/why-can2019t-a-woman-be-more-like-a-man Why Can't a Woman Be More Like a Man?], Christina Hoff Sommers, ''The American'' March/April 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Feminism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&amp;diff=905074</id>
		<title>Abortion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion&amp;diff=905074"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T21:48:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /* External Links */ +1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Baby.jpg|right|thumb|250px|A human fetus in the womb]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Abortion''' is the induced termination of a [[pregnancy]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;American Heritage Dictionary definition, [http://www.bartleby.com/61/7/A0020700.html abortion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; often causing [[fetal pain]].  Abortion is a billion-dollar industry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archives.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/03/09/fetal.tissue/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.healthy.net/scr/news.asp?Id=8247&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, Dr. George Tiller &amp;quot;estimated that he performed 250 to 300 late-term abortions in 2003, each costing an average of $6,000.&amp;quot;[http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090327/D976JVSG4.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in the [[United States]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Over 52,000,000 babies have been aborted in the United States since 1973.[http://www.christianliferesources.com/?/library/view.php&amp;amp;articleid=1042]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Western Europe except for [[Ireland]], [[Malta]] and [[Poland]], where it has been abolished.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=50451&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;On April 10, 2007, Portugal legalized abortion up until the 10th week of pregnancy, with some conditions placed on the obtaining of consent for the abortion.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;God warns in His word that a nation that sheds innocent blood will not prosper. (Deuteronomy 19:11-13)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Abortion in Poland]] declined by 99% after [[communism]] was overthrown, and women's health has dramatically improved there due to fewer abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/ab-poland.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''About 80% of women who see an ultrasound of their fetus (unborn child) decide not to abort'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.redorbit.com/news/health/145703/abortion_foes_use_ultrasound__focus_on_the_family_budgets/ .  Note, however, that other variables such as abortion-coercive settings may reduce this percentage.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Millions of women who had an abortion later suffer psychologically or physically from it, and support groups exist to help.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.post-gazette.com/regionstate/20020120abortion0120p3.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many victims of abortion find healing by speaking out against, and discouraging, similar harm to other mothers and their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born,&amp;quot; observed [[Ronald Reagan]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Abortion doesn't solve your problems, it only creates different ones,&amp;quot; warned a full-page ad by many women who had abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.silentnomoreawareness.org/signaturead/ad.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; '''Many women begin regretting their abortion before they even leave the abortion clinic'''.  In some cases, women begin regretting their abortion just before it is performed,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In one case where a woman changed her mind from inside the abortion clinic, she &amp;quot;called her friend from inside the abortion clinic and arranged for her to come 'rescue' her.&amp;quot; [http://www.40daysforlife.com/southfield/index.cfm?load=page&amp;amp;page=30]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but are told by abortionists that it is too late to change their mind because they already signed a consent form (which is a lie - it is never too late to withdraw consent for an abortion).  &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|With me, abortion is not a problem of religion, it's a problem of the Constitution. I believe that until and unless someone can establish that the unborn child ''is not a living human being'', then that child is already protected by the Constitution, which guarantees life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to all of us. -- [[Ronald Reagan]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Health Risks From Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abortion always ends the life of the unborn child, typically by dismemberment.  Abortion increases the risk of breast cancer, future premature birth, and other long-term health problems for the mother, as detailed below. Sometimes women die from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See &amp;quot;Documented Incidents of 365 Women Who Have Been Killed by &amp;quot;Safe&amp;quot; and Legal Abortion.&amp;quot; [http://abortionviolence.com/DEATHS.HTM 365 women who have been killed by 'Legal' abortion]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion and Breast Cancer ==&lt;br /&gt;
The vast majority of scientific studies have shown that abortion causes an increase in breast cancer, including 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;A new study coming from researchers in [[Sri Lanka]] finds women who had abortions ... [had a] 3.42 [increased risk] ... compared with those who kept their baby. ... The Sri Lankan study is the fourth epidemiological study in fourteen months to report an abortion-breast cancer link, including studies from the U.S., China and Turkey.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat6451.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  LifeNews also reported in 2010 that a [[National Cancer Institute]] researcher admitted there was a link between abortion and breast cancer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/nat5850.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Studies showing that abortion increases breast cancer predate the political controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.bcpinstitute.org/brochure.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A study at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center published in 2009 confirmed a 40% increase in risk in breast cancer from abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/dennis-byrne-barbershop/2010/01/breast-cancer-oral-contraceptives-abortion-and-lies.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;It is undisputed that childbirth protects against breast cancer, and thus early termination of pregnancy must increase the risk of cancer for the mother compared to carrying that same pregnancy to birth.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Yet the abortion industry conceals this increased risk, just as the tobacco industry concealed its cancer risk for decades.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mindfully.org/Industry/Tobacco-ChronologyJul98.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Abortion Hurts Women.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Walk for Life rally]]&lt;br /&gt;
A new study on breast cancer in Turkey published in April 2009 in the peer-reviewed World Journal of Surgical Oncology found, through a surveying process, that induced abortion was a statistically significant cause of breast cancer risk. The study concludes, “Our findings suggest that age and induced abortion were found to be significantly associated with increased breast cancer risk….”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wjso.com/content/7/1/37&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Specifically, the study found that Turkish women who received one or more induced abortions had a 66% higher risk of breast cancer than women who never had an abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/jul/09072903.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/press_releases/090728/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Janet Daling, who considers herself supportive of a right to perform abortions, brought the abortion-breast cancer link into the mainstream with her federally funded research on the topic.  Her report, released in 1994, found a 50% increase in breast cancer risk due to induced abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Janet R. Daling et al., &amp;quot;Risk of Breast Cancer Among Young Women: Relationship to Induced Abortion,&amp;quot; 86 Journal of the National Cancer Institute; (1994);1584&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/032801.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  She said, &amp;quot;I have three sisters with breast cancer and I resent people messing with the scientific data to further their own agenda, be they pro-choice or pro-life.  I would have loved to have found no association between breast cancer and abortion, but our research is rock solid and our data is accurate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;L.A. Daily News, Sept. 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Similarly, an early study published in Japan in 1957 showed that women who have abortions have a much higher risk of breast cancer than those who decide to keep their baby.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Segi M, et al. An epidemiological study on cancer in Japan. GANN. 1957; 48:1-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a peer-reviewed medical journal, Karen Malec observed that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/malec.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thirty-eight epidemiological studies exploring an independent link [between abortion and] breast cancer have been published.  Twenty-nine report risk elevations.  Thirteen out of 15 American studies found risk elevations.  Seventeen studies are statistically significant, 16 of which report increased risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S., a specialist in breast cancer an a clinical assistant professor of surgery at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, has explained the physiology and epidemiology of the abortion-breast cancer link.  She made the following observation:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Angela Lanfranchi, M.D., F.A.C.S, &amp;quot;The breast physiology and the epidemiology of the abortion breast cancer link,&amp;quot; 12 Imago Hominis, No. 3, 228 (2005) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This past August in Minneapolis, Patrick Carroll, director of the Pension and Population Research Institute of London, presented a paper to the largest gathering of statisticians in North America.  '''He showed that abortion was the best predictor of breast cancer in Britain.'''  Breast cancer is the only cancer in Britain which has its highest incidence and mortality rate among the upper rather than lower social classes.  Abortion before a full term pregnancy and late pregnancy were the best explanations for this incidence.  He also found that there had been a 70% increase risk of breast cancer between 1971 and 2002 and that for women between 50 and 54 years of age incidence was highly correlated with abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic evidence of abortion causing breast cancer includes the following.  Breast cancer rates are far lower in Western countries that prohibited abortion than in those that promoted it.  Ireland, which virtually bans abortion, reportedly has a lifetime rate of breast cancer of only 1 in 13, nearly half the rate of 1 in 7.5 in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Probability of breast cancer in American Women,&amp;quot; National Cancer Institute (Apr. 15, 2005);  K. O'Flaherty, R. Oakley, &amp;quot;Self-checks 'useless' in breast cancer fight,&amp;quot; Sunday Tribune (Ireland), at 8 (Oct. 6, 2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The rate of breast cancer increases steadily as one travels from Ireland, where abortion is illegal, to Northern Ireland, where abortion is legal but rare, to England, where abortion is common. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; R. O'Reilly, &amp;quot;New weapon in war against breast cancer,&amp;quot; The Press Association Limited (Dec. 17, 1998); &amp;quot;Portugal-abortion referendum,&amp;quot; Associated Press Worldstream (June 27, 1998).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Romania, abortion was illegal under two decades of rule by the dictator Nicolae Ceausescu, and the country enjoyed one of the lowest breast cancer rates in the entire world during that time, far lower than comparable Western countries. Romania's breast cancer rate was an astounding one-sixth the rate of the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A. Khan, &amp;quot;The role of fat in breast cancer,&amp;quot; The Independent (May 18, 1998).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But after the execution of Ceausescu on Christmas Day, 1989, Romania has taken the opposite approach, embracing abortion to the point that Romania now has one of the highest abortion rates in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;N. Abdullaev, &amp;quot;Russians are quickest to marry and divorce,&amp;quot; Moscow Times (Dec 8, 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  One Romanian observer decried, &amp;quot;The liberalization of abortions in Romania in 1990, the significant increase of the number of abortions at relatively short intervals, determined a rise in the incidence of breast and uterine cervix cancer in my country.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Information packet, Women’s Environment and Development Organization (WEDO) World Conference on Breast Cancer (July 1997).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies on rats, which are an accepted method for identifying causes of cancer in humans,  further confirm that abortion does indeed increase the risk of breast cancer.  As Dr. [[Joel Brind]] observed, &amp;quot;Researchers also widely admit to the biological plausibility of abortion as an independent cause of breast cancer, through the estrogen-mediated stimulation of breast growth in the absence of differentiation. This was demonstrated experimentally in rats in the landmark experiments of Russo and Russo.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Joel Brind]], &amp;quot;Induced Abortion as an Independent Risk Factor for Breast Cancer: A Critical Review of Recent Studies Based on Prospective Data,&amp;quot; J. of Am. Physicians &amp;amp; Surgeons 105 (Winter 2005) [http://www.jpands.org/vol10no4/brind.pdf] (citing Russo J, Russo IH. Susceptibility of the mammary gland to&lt;br /&gt;
carcinogenesis. 1980;100:497-512).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additional scientific information on the abortion-breast cancer link is available [http://www.bcpinstitute.org here].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An expert (Dr. Lynn Rosenberg) hired to defend abortion felt compelled to admit, under cross-examination, that a woman increases her risk for breast cancer by having an abortion compared to carrying her pregnancy to childbirth:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/rosenbergs_testimony.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question by the attorney: 'So in other words, a woman who finds herself pregnant at age 15 will have a higher breast cancer risk if she chooses to abort that pregnancy, than if she carries the pregnancy to term, [is that] correct?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Lynn Rosenberg: 'Probably, yes.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Question: 'Looking at that another way, let's compare two women. Let's say both got pregnant at age 15-- one terminates the pregnancy, but the other carries the pregnancy to term. And both women go on to get married and have two kids, say, at age 30 and age 35. Is the risk of breast cancer higher for the woman who had an abortion at age 15 or the woman who had a baby at age 15, all other things being equal?'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dr. Lynn Rosenberg: 'It's probably higher for the one who had an abortion at age 15.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the overwhelming evidence -- and inescapable logic -- for abortion increasing breast cancer, promoters of abortion cite flawed articles in an attempt to deny the link.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The flaws in these articles are exposed in [[Harvard abortion study]] and [http://www.jpands.org/vol10no1/aschlafly.pdf].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Dr. Lanfranchi has explained:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well-documented breast physiology accounts for the fact that oral contraceptives and abortion are risk factors for breast cancer.  There is an effort to suppress this information by federal agencies and those in academic medicine.  Without this information, women cannot make a fully informed choice about their method of fertility control or about whether to maintain an unplanned pregnancy.  Medical ethics demands that they be informed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-choice should include ''informed'' choice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Archdiocese of St. Louis, for example, remarked about abortions and increased risk for breast cancer: &amp;quot;To dismiss that link is irresponsible.&amp;quot; [http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/5620863.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Yet efforts continue to suppress awareness that abortion increases breast cancer.  Pro-life scientists were almost entirely barred from the National Cancer Institute's &amp;quot;study&amp;quot; of the link, and its resulting statements were fatally flawed as explained in  [[National Cancer Institute on Abortion]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just as organizations denied or failed to disclose the connection between smoking and lung cancer, many organizations aligned with [[liberal]] politicians deny the correlation between abortion and breast cancer despite numerous studies published in peer reviewed journals indicating a likely connection.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smelliesdoublecrochet.jpg|right|thumb|250px| The Smellie's double crochet abortion tool was used to grab and forcibly remove the fetus from the womb.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion Causes Future Harm with Premature Births ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;At least 49 studies have demonstrated a statistically significant increase in premature births (PB) or low birth weight (LBW) risk in women with prior induced abortions (IAs).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brent Rooney and Byron C. Calhoun, &amp;quot;Induced Abortion and Risk of Later Premature Births,&amp;quot; 8 J. Am. Physicians &amp;amp; Surgeons 46 (Summer 2003). [http://www.jpands.org/vol8no2/rooney.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Premature birth tragically causes brain damage, and an array of other severe, lifelong injuries ranging from Cerebral Palsy to blindness, or even death, and few mothers would knowingly increase the risk of that happening.  &amp;quot;There are at least seventeen (17) studies that have found that previous induced abortions increase preterm birth risk” and thereby increase debilitating Cerebral Palsy in children.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brent Rooney, Letter, 96 European Journal of Obstetrics &amp;amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 239 (2001) (citations omitted).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the generally pro-abortion British medical journal, ''The Lancet'', admitted that a procedure often used in abortion increase the risk of premature birth:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr, Jay D. Iams, Dr. Robert Romero, Jennifer F. Culhane (PhD), Dr. Robert L. Goldenberg.  Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet   2008;371:164-175.  While the text of this article conceals the connection with abortion, it cites as support for its claims two studies showing how abortion increases risk of premature birth: the 2004 'Ancel' study of ten (10) European countries and the 2005 'Moreau' study that used French subjects.  Ancel P-Y,  Lelong  N,  Papiernik  E, Saurel-Cubizoilles M-J, Kaminski M.  History of induced abortion as a risk factor for preterm birth in European countries: results of the EUROPOP survey. Human Reproduction. 2004;112:734-740.  Moreau C, Kaminski M, Ancel PY et al.  Previous I induced abortions and the risk of very preterm delivery; Results of the EPIPAGE study.  British J Obstetrics Gynaecology 2005; 112:430-437.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;For example, greater public and professional awareness of evidence that repeated uterine instrumentation--eg, uterine curettage or endometrial biopsy--is associated with increased risk of subsequent preterm birth might over time influence decision-making about the procedure.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Researchers Rooney and Calhoun observed:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Large studies have reported a doubling of [early premature birth] EPB risk from two prior IAs.  Women who had four or more IAs experienced, on average, nine times the risk of [extremely early premature births] XPB, an increase of 800 percent.  These results suggest that women contemplating IA should be informed of this potential risk to subsequent pregnancies, and that physicians should be aware of the potential liability and possible need for intensified prenatal care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic evidence of how abortion increases premature birth includes the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): &amp;quot;[T]he abortion rate for black women has been approximately '''three times''' as high as that for white women (range: 2.6--3.1) since 1991&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss5407a1.htm (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Science Daily'''s report on a study by the Washington University School of Medicine: &amp;quot;African-American women are '''three times''' more likely to deliver babies three to 17 weeks prematurely than Caucasian women&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070209074144.htm (emphasis added)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 an article entitled &amp;quot;Preterm Birth: A Continuing Challenge&amp;quot; noted that premature births are abnormally high in the United States, citing a study that observed that a previous abortion is a &amp;quot;risk factor[] for both infertility and preterm birth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1595132/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rate of premature birth is elevated by the same amount as the abortion rate, as expected if abortion increases the risk of premature birth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other Health Risks from Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] ruled in 2007 that:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Gonzales v. Carhart'', 127 S. Ct. 1610, 1634 (2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:While we find no reliable data to measure the phenomenon, it seems unexceptionable to conclude some women come to regret their choice to abort the infant life they once created and sustained. See Brief for Sandra Cano ''et al.'' as Amici Curiae in No. 05-380, pp 22-24. Severe depression and loss of esteem can follow. See ''ibid.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study published in the Southern Medical Journal observed that there are higher death rates association with women who have abortion, and that these higher death rates persist over time and across socioeconomic boundaries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;D.C. Reardon, P.G. Ney, F.J. Scheuren, J.R. Cougle, P.K. Coleman, T. Strahan, &amp;quot;Deaths associated with pregnancy outcome: a record linkage study of low income women,&amp;quot; 95 Southern Medical Journal 8, at 834-41 (August 2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[England]], the &amp;quot;Royal College of Psychiatrists says women should not be allowed to have an abortion until they are counselled on the possible risk to their mental health.&amp;quot;  The medical royal college warned that women who have abortions may be at risk of mental health problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article3559486.ece&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A New Zealand study found that abortion in young women may be associated with increased risks of mental health problems.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;amp;db=pubmed&amp;amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;amp;list_uids=16405636&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The researcher in this study, who was not pro-life, was shaken by the study and had to go to four journals before he could find one who would publish it. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thinkingchristian.net/C1148465919/E20060224082323/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The study concludes with the following statement:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|These findings are inconsistent with the current consensus on the psychological effects of abortion. In particular, in its 2005 statement on abortion, the American Psychological Association concluded that “well-designed studies of psychological responses following abortion have consistently shown that risk of psychological harm is low...the percentage of women who experience clinically relevant distress is small and appears to be no greater than in general samples of women of reproductive age” (American Psychological Association, 2005). This relatively strong conclusion about the absence of harm from abortion was based on a relatively small number of studies which had one or more of the following limitations: a) absence of comprehensive assessment of mental disorders; b) lack of comparison groups; and c) limited statistical controls. Furthermore, the statement appears to disregard the findings of a number of studies that had claimed to show negative effects for abortion (Cougle et al., 2003; Gissler et al., 1996; Reardon &amp;amp; Cougle, 2002). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thinkingchristian.net/C1148465919/E20060224082323/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor David Fergusson, lead author of the New Zealand study stated: &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|It borders on scandalous that one of the most common surgical procedures performed on young women is so poorly researched and evaluated. If this were Prozac or Vioxx, reports of associated harm would be taken much more seriously with more careful research and monitoring procedures.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20060120-091648-6456r.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another study published in the OB/GYN Survey detailed long-term physical and psychological health consequences of induced abortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;J.M. Thorp, Jr., K.E. Hartmann, and E.M. Shadigian, &amp;quot;Long-Term Physical &amp;amp; Psychological Health Consequences of Induced Abortion: Review of the Evidence,&amp;quot; 58 OB/GYN Survey 1, at 67-79 (2003)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suicide rates among women who had abortions are six times higher than women who gave birth in the prior year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionrecoverycounseling.com/Page8.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Overall, deaths from suicide, homicide and accidents were 248% higher after an abortion, as found by a 13-year study in Finland of its entire population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, only one state (Missouri) requires that the abortionist have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mo. Rev. Stat. § 188.080 prohibits an abortion by a physician &amp;quot;who does not have clinical privileges at a hospital which offers obstetrical or gynecological care located within thirty miles of the location at which the abortion is performed or induced.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the other 49 states, an abortion patient can and often is left without prompt medical care by the treating physician.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the largest abortion providers in the United States, the Metropolitan Medical Associates of New Jersey, was shut down in 2007 by state health officials after one of its botched abortions left a 20-year-old woman in a coma for more than four weeks.  She &amp;quot;became severely ill following the abortion and was transferred to Newark Beth Israel Medical Center where she needed blood transfusions and had her uterus removed. She also suffered a stroke due to the serious blood loss and had one of her lungs collapse.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifenews.com/state2137.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The State of New Jersey had shut down the same facility in 1993 also.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Optionline]] provides consultants that connects individuals to nearby pregnancy centers that offer the following services: free pregnancy tests and pregnancy information; Information about the risks of abortion and the morning after pill; medical services, including [[STD]] tests; early ultrasounds and pregnancy confirmation. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pregnancycenters.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, some of these centers provide information regarding free housing to women who are facing housing concerns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pregnancycenters.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary alternative to abortion is adoption. [[Liberty Godparent Foundation]] is a [[Christian]] organization focused on improving the lives of unwed pregnant teens, babies and adoptive families by providing two alternatives, The Liberty Godparent Maternity Home and Family Life Services Adoption Agency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.godparent.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=20&amp;amp;Itemid=59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. [[Catholic Social Services]] provides adoption assistance to people of all beliefs in addition to supporting families in need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion Industry and How It Targets Minority Communities ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:4287336112 d3f9126c99.jpg|right|thumb|325px|According to [[Cybercast News Service]]: &amp;quot;An analysis by the Cybercast News Service compared the location of [[Planned Parenthood]] abortion clinics with population data from the U.S. Census in 2000. The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200502%5CSPE20050207a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/muriel215/4287336112/ Flickr, see Creative commons license agreement)]&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Each day '''1,786''' African American children are aborted.&amp;quot; According to the [[U.S.]] Census of 2006, African Americans are at 1.96 birth rate which is &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;beneath&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the replacement level of 2.1. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/1685410938.html African American Pro-Life Group Holds Protest at NAACP] Christian News Network, July 13, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the continued rate, [[racism]] by abortion will decimate the black population of the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to writer George Grant, the author of ''Killing Angel'':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;During the 1980s when [[Planned Parenthood]] shifted its focus from community-based clinics to school-based clinics, it again targeted inner-city minority neighborhoods...Of the more than 100 school-based clinics that have opened nationwide in the last decade [1980s], none has been at substantially all-white schools....None has been at suburban middle-class schools. All have been at black, minority or ethnic schools.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/special_issues/population/the_negro_project.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Planned Parenthood itself reported that its abortions on minorities in 1991 was 42.7% of its total abortions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  However, during that time period, minorities comprised only 19.7% of the U.S. population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ewtn.com/library/PROLIFE/PPRACISM.TXT&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Cybercast News Service]]: &amp;quot;An analysis by the Cybercast News Service compared the location of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics with population data from the U.S. Census in 2000. The results appear to bolster the charge that the organization targets black communities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5Carchive%5C200502%5CSPE20050207a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Support of Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
The most powerful political action committee (PAC) is EMILY’s List.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.emilyslist.org/newsroom/releases/20070201.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; EMILY's List contributes money to Democratic candidates who support abortion-on-demand, including forced taxpayer funding of abortion.  EMILY's List candidates also oppose regulations such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:providing health information to abortion patients;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:requiring that the abortionist have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital in case there is a complication; and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:providing parental notification if the patient is a teenager.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the influence of the abortion industry and EMILY's List, nearly every Democratic presidential candidate and senatorial candidate supports abortion-on-demand.  &amp;quot;EMILY's List, the nation's largest political action committee, continues to be the dominant financial resource for Democratic candidates,&amp;quot; its above-referenced website declares.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no comparably funded organization opposing abortion, because there are no monetary rewards to defending human life.  Instead, candidates and supporters who oppose abortion are motivated by religious and ethical principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History of Abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:115523-004-FA619CA3.jpg|thumb|right|250px| The perverse and cruel [[atheism|atheist]] [[Marquis de Sade]] advocated induced abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://jme.bmj.com/content/6/1/7.abstract&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
''Please also see:'' [[History of abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The father of [[medicine]], [[Hippocrates]], expressly prohibited abortion in his ethical [[Oath]] long before [[Christianity]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Journal of Medical Ethics'' article declared concerning the [[atheism|atheist]] and [[sadism|sadist]] [[Marquis de Sade]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In 1795 the Marquis de Sade published his La Philosophic dans le boudoir, in which he proposed the use of induced abortion for social reasons and as a means of population control. It is from this time that medical and social acceptance of abortion can be dated, although previously the subject had not been discussed in public in modern times. It is suggested that it was largely due to de Sade's writing that induced abortion received the impetus which resulted in its subsequent spread in western society.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://jme.bmj.com/content/6/1/7.abstract&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Population control]] is based on [[pseudoscience]] and ill founded [[economics|economic]] assumptions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/11/pz_myers_on_abortion040971.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to 1973 abortion was illegal in most of the United States, though a few states (such as Hawaii and New York) allowed it with restrictions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''A Timeline of Reproductive Rights'' [http://ecampus.bentley.edu/org/wc/reproductiverights.html The Women's Center]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The U.S. Supreme Court's 1973 [[Roe v. Wade]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Online text of [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&amp;amp;court=US&amp;amp;vol=410&amp;amp;page=113 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; decision ruled that abortions are lawful under the [[U.S. Constitution]] up to the point at which the fetus becomes able to survive outside the womb, and an accompanying decision issued the same day captioned [[Doe v. Bolton]] essentially legalized abortion in the unlimited discretion of the abortionist at any time during pregnancy, up to and including birth.  Conservatives immediately criticized these decisions as examples of [[Judicial Activism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, worldwide there were approximately 115,000 abortions done per day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2008, approximately 83% of all abortions were performed in developing countries and 17% occurred in developed countries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/fastfacts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States may regulate abortion, such as requiring a 24-hour waiting period and parental consent for minors.  Abortion clinics often fail to comply with the health standards of surgical facilities, and States can require compliance (but often do not, resulting in discomfort and harm to the victims of abortion).  Many abortionists lack hospital admitting privileges at nearby facilities, so women having complications must go on their own to emergency rooms to see physicians unfamiliar with what actually happened.  For any other operation the cost of treating complications is included in the cost of the operation, but for abortions the abortion clinics take their money and typically do not pay for the care of complications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The more pro-abortion the State regulations are, the larger the number of abortion clinics it will have.  [[Arizona]], though a pro-life State, has a regulatory system that results in twelve abortion clinics operating within its borders.  In contrast, [[Mississippi]] has only one abortion clinic, and [[Missouri]] has only two.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Adolf Hitler and Abortion ===&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information see:'' [[Abortion and Adolf Hitler]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hitlerspeech.jpg|thumb|290px|right|[[Adolf Hitler]]]]‎In 1942 [[Adolf Hitler]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|In view of the large families of the Slav native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible. We are not interested in seeing the non-[[German]] population multiply…We must use every means to instill in the population the idea that it is harmful to have several children, the expenses that they cause and the dangerous effect on woman's health… It will be necessary to open special institutions for abortions and doctors must be able to help out there in case there is any question of this being a breach of their professional ethics. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007/sep/07090708.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[World War II]], the War Crimes Tribunal indicted ten [[Nazi]] leaders for &amp;quot;encouraging and compelling abortion,&amp;quot; which the tribunal considered a &amp;quot;crime against humanity.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_25.asp#But%20didn%E2%80%99t%20Hitler%20oppose%20abortion?&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Atheists and abortion ==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Barna Group]] found concering [[Atheism and Morality|atheism and morality]] that those who hold to the worldviews of [[atheism]] or [[agnosticism]] in America were more likely, than theists in America, to look upon the following behaviors as morally acceptable: illegal drug use; excessive drinking; sexual relationships outside of marriage; abortion; cohabitating with someone of opposite sex outside of marriage; obscene language; gambling; pornography and obscene sexual behavior; and engaging in [[homosexuality]]/[[bisexuality]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/5-barna-update/58-practical-outcomes-replace-biblical-principles-as-the-moral-standard&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American Liberals and Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Pew Research Center, American [[liberal]]s are more likely to support pro-abortion views. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/283/pragmatic-americans-liberal-and-conservative-on-social-issues&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evolutionary Thought and Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Theory of evolution and liberalism|Liberals are more likely to advocate the evolutionary paradigm than conservatives]].  [[Creation Ministries International]] has written that [[evolution|evolutionary]] thinking has contributed to the [[eugenics|eugenic]] idea of aborting babies with defects and has also contributed to erroneous and immoral justifications for abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/abortion-an-indispensable-right-or-violence-against-women-sex-selection-aborting-girls&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/human-life-questions-and-answers-abortion-and-euthanasia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Poll on Reasons for Abortions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:AbortionReasons.jpg‎|thumb|400px| Primary reasons women reported for undergoing abortions]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Alan Guttmacher Institute, which is not a [[conservative]] or [[pro-life]] organization, conducted a poll of more than 1,200 patients undergoing induced abortions at 11 large-scale [[abortion facilities]] in the United States. The women were asked to identify reasons for seeking abortion, singling out the primary reason. An additional 38 women at four sites were interviewed in-depth.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf Lawrence Finer, et al., &amp;quot;Reasons U.S. Women Have Abortions: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives&amp;quot;, ''Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health'', September 2005]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The poll omitted any reference to whether the women were able to see an ultrasound of their unborn children before choosing to have an abortion.  For the vast majority of women who have abortion, the reason is a lack of knowledge about the unborn child as displayed by an ultrasound.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among reasons provided to the women as part of the poll, the two most common selections were &amp;quot;Having a baby would dramatically change my life&amp;quot; (74%) and &amp;quot;I can't afford a baby now&amp;quot; (73%).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Concerns about their own health were mentioned by only 13% of the women, while only 12% mentioned concerns about the baby's health, though only 3% and 4% respectively gave those as their primary reason for seeking abortion.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, only 14% indicated &amp;quot;[[husband]] or partner wants me to have an abortion&amp;quot; as a reason, down from 24% in a previous survey in 1987.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;agiSurvey&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; This conflicts with research on women post-abortion, among whom 64% reported feeling pressured by others to abort.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;reardon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.theunchoice.com/pdf/FactSheets/ForcedAbortionFactSheet.pdf David Reardon, &amp;quot;Forced Abortion in America&amp;quot;, April 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is often ignored in studies of why women submit to abortions is an ambivalence by some in early pregnancy. Such ambivalence typically resolves when the mother becomes more aware of her unborn child, as displayed by an [[ultrasound]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lederman, ''Psychosocial Adaptation in Pregnancy'', 1984&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Unwanted Pregnancy,&amp;quot; ''Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology'', 1970, Cited in Gardner, ''Abortion: The Personal Dilemma'', 1972&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nichols and Humenick, ''Childbirth Education: Practice, Research, and Theory'', 1988&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ultrasound images==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.ob-ultrasound.net/frames.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.flickr.com/photos/drakelelane/388759116/&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/13_weeks.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/ultrasound_3d.htm&lt;br /&gt;
*http://www.parentingweekly.com/pregnancy/pregnancy_information/ultrasound/triple_jump.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservapedia:Pro-life Project|Conservapedia Pro-life Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.conservapedia.com/Category:Abortion Directory of abortion related articles]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.investigatemagazine.com/mar3abrt.htm Abortion and breast cancer in New Zealand]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion Facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion funding]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion genocide]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion procedures]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion rates by US state]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortionist]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti Abortion activism: a personal essay]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[More News/Abortion|Articles about '''Abortion''' from &amp;quot;More News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Culture of life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Separate Life|Essay on abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Eugenics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fetus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Harvard abortion study]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion breast cancer studies]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexual activists and abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/chs/abrpt/2006abrpt.pdf Minnesota official abortion statistics]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Right to Life Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Partial birth abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right to life]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Right to life movement]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sanctity of life]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Silent scream]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Taxpayer-funded abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* WikiMANNia: [http://wikimannia.org/Abtreibung Abtreibung] (german)&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.abortionfacts.com/ Abortion Facts]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.carm.org/abortion.htm Abortion] by [[Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lifesitenews.com/ LifeSiteNews.com]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ProLifeOnCampus.com/ Pro Life on Campus]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/abortion/ What Liberals Say - Category: Abortion], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Abortion}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion and Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminist_Bible&amp;diff=905073</id>
		<title>Feminist Bible</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminist_Bible&amp;diff=905073"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T21:44:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /* External links */ +1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Feminist Bible''' refers to any [[Bible]] translation that kowtows to aspects of [[feminist]] ideology, such as the acceptance of [[abortion]].  These translations distort the meaning of the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The often-promoted [[NIV]] (1984 edition) is an example of a Feminist Bible.  The NIV uses the word &amp;quot;womb&amp;quot; -- a word often associated with the unborn child -- only 57 times, compared with 70 times by the [[NASB]] and 82 times by the [[ESV]], which is a modern translation widely respected for its accuracy.  The problem of feminism has worsened in the new edition of the NIV, the 2010 version, which goes as far to use gender-neutral pronouns where masculine pronouns would be more appropriate. Here are numerous examples of how the NIV (both the 1984 and 2010 editions) systematically purges references to the unborn child:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Verse&lt;br /&gt;
![[KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
![[NASB]]&lt;br /&gt;
![[NIV]] (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
!NIV (2010)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/ New NIV passage lookup here]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruth 1:11&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... are there yet any more '''''sons in my womb''''', that they may be your husbands?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... Have I yet '''''sons in my womb''''', that they may be your husbands?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... Am I going to have any more sons, who could become your husbands?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... Am I going to have any more sons, who could become your husbands?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Matthew 1:18&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... she was found '''''with child''''' of the Holy Ghost.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... she was found to be '''''with child''''' by the Holy Spirit.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... she was found to be '''''with child''''' through the Holy Spirit.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... she was found to be '''''pregnant''''' through the Holy Spirit.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Luke 1:15&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... shall drink neither wine nor strong drink; and he shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, '''''even from his mother's womb'''''.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... and he will drink no  wine or liquor, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit '''''while yet in his mother's womb'''''.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit '''''even from birth'''''.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit '''''even before he is born'''''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Among these nine key [[abortion]]-related verses, this is the only one where the &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; (2010) NIV differs from the old (1984) NIV, raising questions about how much of the new NIV is really new.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Luke 1:42&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;And she spake out with a loud voice, and said, Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;And she cried out with a loud voice and said, 'Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;In a loud voice she exclaimed: 'Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;In a loud voice she exclaimed: “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the child you will bear!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Luke 2:5&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;To be taxed with Mary his espoused wife, being great with child.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;in order to register along with Mary, who was engaged to him, and was with child.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Pledged&amp;quot;&amp;gt;See the discussion about [[marriage]] below.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to be married to him and was expecting a child.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Pledged&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; to be married to him and was expecting a child.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Luke 11:27&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... Blessed is the womb that bare thee, and the paps which thou hast sucked.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... 'Blessed is the womb that bore You and the breasts at which You nursed.'&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... 'Blessed is the mother who gave you birth and nursed you.'&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... 'Blessed is the mother who gave you birth and nursed you.'&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah 1:5&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou camest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, And before you were born I consecrated you ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah 31:8&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... woman with child ...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... Among them the blind and the lame, The woman with child and she who is in labor with child, together ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... Among them will be the blind and the lame, expectant mothers and women in labor ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... Among them will be the blind and the lame, expectant mothers and women in labor ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Romans 9:10-11&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... but when Rebecca also had '''''conceived''''' by one, even by our father Isaac; (For the '''''children being not yet born''''', neither having done any good or evil ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... when she had conceived twins by one man, our father Isaac; for though the twins were not yet born and had not done anything good or bad ...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;... Yet, before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Psalm 78:6&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;That the generation to come might know them, even the '''''children which should be born''''' ...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;so the next generation would know them, even the children yet to be born, and they in turn would tell their children.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;so the next generation would know them, even the '''''children yet to be born''''' ...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;so the next generation would know them, even the '''''children yet to be born''''' ...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other examples of feminist distortions in the NIV include the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Verse&lt;br /&gt;
![[KJV]]&lt;br /&gt;
![[NASB]]&lt;br /&gt;
![[NIV]] (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
!NIV (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1 John 3:1&lt;br /&gt;
|Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God ....&lt;br /&gt;
|See how great a love the Father has bestowed on us, that we would be called children of God ....&lt;br /&gt;
|How great is the love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! ....&lt;br /&gt;
|See what great love the Father has lavished on us, that we should be called children of God! ....&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Luke 5:20&lt;br /&gt;
|And when he saw their faith, he said unto him, Man [ἄνθρωπος, which is the masculine form: man], thy sins are forgiven thee.&lt;br /&gt;
|Seeing their faith, He said, &amp;quot;Friend, your sins are forgiven you.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|When Jesus saw their faith, he said, &amp;quot;Friend, your sins are forgiven.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|When Jesus saw their faith, he said, &amp;quot;Friend, your sins are forgiven.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Revisions to the NIV further promote feminist distortions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tbaptist.com/aab/nivfembible.htm The Feminist NIV]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The translating committee for the new version of the [[NIV]] lacks any self-described &amp;quot;complementarians&amp;quot; who support the differences between men and women, for example.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Moo declined to label any of the committee members as &amp;quot;complementarians' ....&amp;quot;[http://www.abpnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=4357&amp;amp;Itemid=53 New NIV translation due out in 2011]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feminists also object to 1 Tim 2:12 (&amp;quot;I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent.&amp;quot;), but the original Greek is so clear that not much can be done to distort it.  Only the most most liberal translations, as in injecting plural forms of &amp;quot;woman&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;man&amp;quot;, and also twisting the second half to read &amp;quot;listen quietly.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Marriage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feminists are often critical of traditional marriage, and the NIV translation uses the potentially demeaning term to &amp;quot;pledged&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;engaged&amp;quot; to describe planned marriages in the Bible.  (The term &amp;quot;pledged&amp;quot; connotes a thing or a slave rather than a dignified person.)  The NIV says, for example, that Mary was &amp;quot;pledged to be married&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;engaged to be married.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Matthew 1:18, Luke 1:27 and 2:5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are about ten references to the NIV (1984) to &amp;quot;pledged&amp;quot; to be married rather than &amp;quot;engaged&amp;quot; to be married.  The 2010 translation to the NIV then added yet another use of &amp;quot;pledged&amp;quot;, 1 Corinthians 7:27: &amp;quot;Are you pledged to a woman? Do not seek to be released. Are you free from such a commitment? Do not look for a wife.&amp;quot;  The more respected [[NASB]] translation of that same passage is: &amp;quot;Are you bound to a wife? Do not seek to be released. Are you released from a wife? Do not seek a wife.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other Examples ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grammatical errors creep into Feminist Bibles due to a reluctance to use the male pronoun, such that the plural, gender-neutral pronoun is used even when referring to only one person.  For example, most English translations translate James 2:15-16:  &amp;quot;If a brother or sister has nothing to wear and has no food for the day, and one of you says to ''them'' ....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Surprisingly, virtually all English translations from the [[KJV]] to today have this grammatical error.  The quoted translation is from the [[New American Bible]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The pronoun &amp;quot;them&amp;quot; is grammatically incorrect in this case but is intended to avoid using a gender-specific pronoun.  The [[New Century Version]] translates that in a grammatically correct (but still awkward style) as &amp;quot;A brother or sister in Christ might need clothes or food.  If you say to ''that person'' ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples of translations that have feminist tendencies are the [[NIV]], the [[New King James Version]], the [[Today's New International Version]], the [[New American Bible]] and, to a lesser extent, the [[Holman Christian Standard Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, in Mark 9:36 Jesus makes reference to a child and a pronoun is then appropriate for referring to the child.  The [[New American Bible]] refers to the child as an &amp;quot;it&amp;quot; in order to appease feminism:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mark 9:36 (NAB) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Taking a child he placed ''it'' in their midst, and putting his arms around ''it'', he said to them ....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today's New International Version makes an awkward double reference to &amp;quot;child&amp;quot; to avoid using the masculine pronoun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even the [[KJV]] sometimes slips into inappropriate gender-neutral language, as in Romans 8:17 when it translates a form of &amp;quot;τέκνον&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;children&amp;quot; rather than its proper meaning as &amp;quot;sons&amp;quot;, which fits the usage in that passage with respect to glorification as Christ was.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to the above, words that are disfavored by feminists and are targets for censorship or distortion by a Feminist Bible:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*girl&lt;br /&gt;
*unborn&lt;br /&gt;
*manly&lt;br /&gt;
*ma'am, madam, and sir&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;women&amp;quot; in connection with &amp;quot;men&amp;quot;, as in &amp;quot;men and women&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*masculine forms of titles or offices, as in &amp;quot;prophet&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;congressman&amp;quot;, when the person is female&lt;br /&gt;
*masculine descriptions of types of persons, as in &amp;quot;layman&amp;quot; (Lv 22:12) or &amp;quot;salesman&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;dear lady&amp;quot; (2 John 1:5 - the [[Holman Christian Standard Bible]] and [[New King James Version]] drop the &amp;quot;dear&amp;quot;, and [[The Message]] drops &amp;quot;lady&amp;quot; too)&lt;br /&gt;
*virgin&lt;br /&gt;
*the use of the exclusively feminine pronoun to refer to nations, boats, hurricanes, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
*the use of the exclusively masculine pronoun to refer to a person of unknown gender&lt;br /&gt;
*Mark 5:3 (&amp;quot;no one&amp;quot; preferred by feminists to &amp;quot;no man,&amp;quot; despite the obviously male context of the verse)&lt;br /&gt;
*submit (used in various forms 23 times in the Bible, most often in reference to a wife's role and, unlike Islam, almost never in reference to submission to God)&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;common man&amp;quot; (which can be used effectively often, as in Luke 10:21&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[New Century Version]], a [[feminist]] rendition, uses the gender neutral &amp;quot;little children&amp;quot;; the [[Holman Christian Standard Bible]] uses the gender neutral &amp;quot;infants&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
*adultery&lt;br /&gt;
*words that highlight female personalities related to the attraction of men, or unflattering about women, such as &amp;quot;temptress&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*gentlemanly&lt;br /&gt;
*chivalry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(add to list)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* WikiMANNia: [http://wikimannia.org/Bibel_gegendert Bibel gegendert] (Bibel in gerechter Sprache)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Abortion and the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminist style]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gender differences]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Politically_correct&amp;diff=905072</id>
		<title>Politically correct</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Politically_correct&amp;diff=905072"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T21:41:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /* External Links */ +1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Politically correct''' restrictions on what we can say and how we say it have been imposed by leftists on the American public to restrict debate and silence opposition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theobamafile.com/_opinion/PoliticalCorrectness.htm The Obama File: Political Correctness]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''...is the communal [[tyranny]] that erupted in the 1980s. It was a spontaneous declaration that particular ideas, expressions and behaviour, which were then legal, should be forbidden by law, and people who transgressed should be punished. (see [[Newspeak]]) It started with a few voices but grew in popularity until it became unwritten and written law within the community. With those who were publicly declared as being not politically correct becoming the object of persecution by the mob, if not prosecution by the state.'''}}&lt;br /&gt;
-Philip Atkinson &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ourcivilisation.com/pc.htm Atkinson; &amp;quot;The Origin and Nature of Political Correctness&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:PC-PILGRIM.JPG|thumb|400px|Horsey cartoon 11-22-2007 parodies PC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The modern politically correct movement began at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]]; one of the most liberal institutions in the United States and is often viewed as a liberalist degrading of the [[First Amendment|freedom of speech]]. George Orwell's ''Nineteen Eighty-Four'' famously incorporated the notion of limiting thought through language (see [[Newspeak]]).  Words or actions that violate '''political correctness''' are called politically incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At American universities, liberals began imposing '''political correctness''' to prevent recognition of differences among gender, religion, belief system, sexual orientation and nationality.  In the 1960s, [[feminists]] began to demand that the neutral pronouns ''he'', ''him'' and ''his'' be replaced with expressions like &amp;quot;he or she&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;him or her&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;them&amp;quot;, etc. They argued that no one would be able to understand that the masculine gender included the feminine gender in neutral contexts. But this was just part of their campaign to redefine the social roles traditionally associated with masculinity and femininity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Political correctness''' or '''P.C.''' also means the alteration of one's choice of words in order to avoid either offending a group of people or reinforcing a stereotype considered to be disadvantageous to the group.  More specifically, groups which (or whose putative leaders or other activists) claim some status as systemically oppressed or discriminated against will periodically attempt to change the terms by which they are referred to and demand that society as a whole change its usage of words as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An example of political correctness is the changing terminology used to described handicapped people.  In the past the term &amp;quot;crippled&amp;quot; was perfectly acceptable and not considered offensive.  At some point, Americans like Senate Republican leader [[Bob Dole]] decided &amp;quot;crippled&amp;quot; was degrading and the preferred term changed to &amp;quot;handicapped.&amp;quot;  This, too, was eventually deemed offensive and &amp;quot;disabled&amp;quot; became the preferred term.  Today, &amp;quot;disabled&amp;quot; is now considered degrading and &amp;quot;differently abled&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;physically challenged&amp;quot; are now the politically correct terms.  The same can be said for the changing uses of terms for Black Americans:  &amp;quot;Negro&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;colored,&amp;quot; once perfectly acceptable terms, became offensive during the 1970s and &amp;quot;Afro-American&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Black&amp;quot; came into use, which in turn gave way to &amp;quot;[[African Americans|African-American]],&amp;quot; and in broader usage, &amp;quot;people of color.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The question of politically correct language has spilled over from the use of racially descriptive words and affected the use of traditional language.  In 1999, an aide to the mayor of Washington DC described a budget decision as &amp;quot;niggardly&amp;quot; (a word meaning &amp;quot;stingy,&amp;quot; unrelated to the racial slur).  The aide immediately came under criticism and was forced to resigned even though he had not said anything racially charged. However, his name was cleared within a matter of days and was offered to return to his previous position. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/longterm/williams/williams020499.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As well as language, political correctness discourages the use of racial or stereotypes in fiction out of concern that these stereotypes may become self-perpetuating. For example, frequently seeing the image black gang-members decked out in gold chains, carrying guns and listening to rap may pressure young black people into seeing this lifestyle as the more 'acceptable' choice for their racial group. The common image of female-dominated occupations (nurses, secretaries, care workers, etc) and of male-dominated occupations (IT workers, military, machinery operators, mechanics, etc.) can discourage individuals of either gender from considering those occupations traditionally belonging to the other. Additionally films like &amp;quot;The Siege&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;True Lies&amp;quot; have been criticized by pro-Islamic groups as having Muslims portrayed as terrorists, despite the fact that most current terrorists are in fact Muslims.  Thus political correctness becomes the consideration of all public statements and media for their unintentional social impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Political correctness can even affect terminology that's viewed by secularists as too &amp;quot;pro-religion&amp;quot; or an alleged &amp;quot;violation of the separation of church and state&amp;quot; in the United States. The best example of this is the active promotion of the use of [[C.E.]] and [[B.C.E.]] as the abbreviations used after dates (instead of the commonly and traditionally used [[A.D.]] and [[B.C.]]). Additionally, [[atheists]] as school administrators or [[government]] [[Labor union|union]] workers at liberal schools use political correctness as a means for renaming terms they view as too pro-religious. For example, a [[Seattle]] student at a local elementary school volunteered to do a project as part of a community-service effort that she was doing through her school, supplying plastic eggs filled with jellybeans, called &amp;quot;Easter eggs.&amp;quot;  The student had an idea to fill little plastic eggs with treats and jelly beans and other candy to give to her classmates, but she was concerned how the teacher might react to the eggs after learning earlier in the week about &amp;quot;their abstract behavior rules.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mynorthwest.com/?nid=11&amp;amp;sid=459668&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After asking the teacher for permission, the student reportedly explained, &amp;quot;She said that I could do it as long as I called this treat '''spring spheres''.' I couldn't call them Easter eggs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2011/04/mystery_seattle_student_claims.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/04/easter_eggs_reportedly_renamed.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Differing Opinions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demands for politically correct language usage are rooted in the notion widely promoted among left-wing academics and sociologists that Western culture promotes systemic oppression against some groups by marginalizing them and excluding them from the &amp;quot;norm&amp;quot;; the groups thus supposedly systemically marginalized are referred to as &amp;quot;the Other&amp;quot; by these left-wing academics.  The implication is that these groups are systemically excluded from the mainstream.  &amp;quot;Colored people&amp;quot; is therefore deemed offensive because the order of words puts &amp;quot;colored&amp;quot; first, emphasizing their difference from the mainstream, while &amp;quot;people of color&amp;quot; is acceptable because putting the term &amp;quot;people&amp;quot; first emphasizes that they are people and thus does not emphasize their difference from the &amp;quot;norm&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some people allege that instead of encouraging supposedly marginalized groups to integrate with and assimilate into the mainstream of Western culture, political correctness ironically encourages them to emphasize and indeed to wallow in their marginalization from society, and to make a public display of such.  This is known as [[identity politics]].  According to this view, gays and lesbians are therefore encouraged to label themselves as &amp;quot;queer&amp;quot; and make public displays of &amp;quot;queerness&amp;quot; calculated to disturb the sensibilities of mainstream people, rather than integrate into the mainstream themselves; Black Americans are encouraged to adopt [[Afrocentrism]] and convert to [[Islam]] or to conform to stereotypical black behavior, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Language Police==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservative scholar [[Robert Bork]] has charged that the educational system is a battleground where the future of America is being undermined and ill-served. He has counseled against the troubles which will ensue as a result of anti-religious policies in the schools, permissive attitudes toward [[homosexuality]] and [[abortion]], as well as welfare policies that have destroyed families since [[Lyndon B. Johnson]]'s War on Poverty. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline. by Robert Bork published by Harper Collins (c) 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In her book &amp;quot;[[The Language Police]]&amp;quot;, [[Diane Ravitch]] documents just how easy it is to get a word, phrase or idea banned from modern textbooks and references.  Ravitch asserts that textbook producers are beholden to small non-elected educational boards in a few key states such as New York, Texas and California and that few citizens know anything about these boards or who holds the seats of power on these boards. It's not difficult for an interest group to mobilize a campaign to bombard the educational board. Meanwhile, the public is not even aware that their words or values are under attack from this corrupt system, while many ''elected'' Conservatives have rallied against this policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presently, however, this may not be the case. In 2010, a group of conservatives on the Texas State Board of Education pushed the state to adopt educational standards that emphasized the role Christianity played in America's founding. Those educational standards also sought to counteract political correctness by removing parts of the curriculum that espoused political correctness and contradicted conservative values.  As one of the largest states in the Union, Texas represents one of the largest markets for textbook publishers. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/14/magazine/14texbooks-t.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once a big state makes a textbook purchase, it's very difficult for a small state or any municipality to make any changes.  Thus, profound changes can be inserted into textbooks and reference books by putting pressure on a handful of educational administrators. The work of textbook selection committees is sometimes done privately, to avoid politicizing textbooks, but the reverse has happened. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Children Learn by [[Diane Ravitch]] (c) 2003 published by Knopf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ravitch has documented &amp;quot;''bias guidelines''&amp;quot; for major publishers of texts and tests. These &amp;quot;guidelines&amp;quot; consist of advice to writers and editors about words and topics that must be avoided.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110003695&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ryan Sorba]] has proposed changing the terminology used to refer to [[homosexual]]s to prevent the politically correct language police from controlling the debate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.americanindependent.com/178239/christian-conservatives-discuss-strategy-for-fighting-war-against-gays-start-with-semantics Christian conservatives discuss strategy for fighting war against gays: Start with semantics], from [[The American Independent]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Totalitarianism and Political Correctness==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comprehensive and detailed control of all ideas, beliefs, and statements is one of the most problematic features of [[totalitarian]] regimes.[http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-3816(196002)22%3A1%3C68%3ATIAP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-W] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Political correctness can trace its origins back to the world of 1920's Germany, where [[Communist]] academics sought to impose their [[Marxist]] views on students. It is now acceptable in many Universities to have courses on gender, [[homosexual]] and [[African American]] studies, which, in fact, encourage the mainstream public to become different to avoid criticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Postmodernism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Racial censorship]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* WikiMANNia: [http://wikimannia.org/Political_correctness Political correctness]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.capc.co.uk The Campaign Against Political Correctness]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://books.google.com/books?id=8olE_futZogC&amp;amp;pg=PA378&amp;amp;lpg=PA378&amp;amp;dq=communist+%22socially+correct%22&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ots=DYD85Lsf1G&amp;amp;sig=pkoUxDOLFJZsme40QO13zakFZw4 The Chinese Have A Word For It]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=218 DiscoverTheNetworks.org - Political Correctness, Appeasement and Speech Codes in Academia]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theobamafile.com/_opinion/PoliticalCorrectness.htm Political correctness] The Obama File&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Marxist terminology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Anti-feminism&amp;diff=905070</id>
		<title>Anti-feminism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Anti-feminism&amp;diff=905070"/>
		<updated>2011-08-24T21:32:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /* External links */ +2&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Antifeminism''' is opposition to [[feminism]] in some or all of its forms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50009621/50009621se1 &amp;quot;Anti-feminist.&amp;quot; ''The Oxford English Dictionary''. 2nd ed. 1989]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Anti-Feminist prefer to follow a more appropriate biblical representative of women modeled in scripture ([[Christianity]]). Many of the bible verses anti-feminist follow are Ephesians 5:22, Titus 2:3-5,First Timothy 5:14, and Proverbs 14:1 and 31.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ephesians 5:22==&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;22Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. 23For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Anti-Feminist believe that wives should submit themselves gracefully to their husbands like it says in Ephesians. The only rare exceptions would be their husband leading the wife into sin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feminists scoff at this teaching claiming that Anti-Feminists are weak or doormats for doing so, Anti-Feminists believe differently. Anti-Feminists claim that it takes a strong woman to yield to another human being. In return the husband is supposed to love the wife as himself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Feminists believe that this is the best way for a marriage to operate. Claiming that some has to lead the family and someone has to become the helpmeet. Both cannot lead or there will be confusion and much fighting. Anti-Feminists believe that because many women in the western world have adopted the feminist notion of scoffing women who submit to their husbands many marriages are in despair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Titus 2:3-5==&lt;br /&gt;
'''3The aged women likewise, that they be in behaviour as becometh holiness, not false accusers, not given to much wine, teachers of good things;4That they may teach the young women to be sober, to love their husbands, to love their children,5To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Older women in scripture are clearly to teach the younger women of the Christian faith to how to behave and other practical skills/necessities. Titus Two women (a name they like to be called) believe that it is their duty to teach younger women whether it be random women or their very own daughters to love their husbands their children and how to become &amp;quot;keepers of the home.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Loving their husbands'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By loving their husbands they mean how to treat their husbands. Respecting is one of them. By showing their husbands Respect they mean to treat him kindly, not trying to change him, not neglecting him of his physical or emotional needs, encouraging him, praising him for his good deeds, keeping oneself attractive (hair, nails done, nice clothes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Loving their children'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Titus Two women know that the second most important part in the marriage after the husband is the children. Most Titus Two women must teach their daughters or &amp;quot;apprentices&amp;quot; how to love children. Many ways of doing this is babysitting children. Babysitting is use many time to cultivate patience, controlling the emotions and getting used to children and their habits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patience is needed when watching children because children are naturally slower to get use to things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Controlling the emotions are also necessary for children can many times &amp;quot;push&amp;quot; adults buttons it is  necessary to learn how to control those emotions especially when dealing with children&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Younger women are also taught the habits of children and how to deal with these habits. Everything about children is taught to these young women so that they themselves may be prepared for their own children someday. A variety of things to learn about children is discipline, passing on convictions, how to take care of them physically (cooking, changing diapers), and teaching them spiritually. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Keepers of the home'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The last thing that should be taught is homemaking skills. homemaking skills include the following&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cooking, cleaning, laundry, flower arraignment, sewing, crocheting, stitching, mending, interior decorating, nutrition, basket weaving, calligraphy, painting, scrap booking, first aid, Agriculture, Horticulture, baking, quilting, organizing and hospitality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vintage homemaking would include: Candle making, making butter, and spinning wool.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Discreet and Chaste''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Feminists believe the discreet and chaste, did not mean that women shouldn't be allowed to talk like many feminists believe but to act and looks like ladies of the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Discreet means (by their accords) to behave accordingly. In other words displaying dignity, diligence, patience, respectful, graceful, a meek and quiet spirit, poise, peace, compassion, responsible, hospitable, cheerfulnesses, humility, discretion, self-control, serenity and love,  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chaste means to be modest in clothing, purity in mind, and to display chastity in the body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Usually homemaking child care and &amp;quot;marriage lessons&amp;quot; begin at age 2-5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Proverbs 31==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''10Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price is far above rubies.11The heart of her husband doth safely trust in her, so that he shall have no need of spoil.12She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life.13She seeketh wool, and flax, and worketh willingly with her hands.14She is like the merchants' ships; she bringeth her food from afar.15She riseth also while it is yet night, and giveth meat to her household, and a portion to her maidens.16She considereth a field, and buyeth it: with the fruit of her hands she planteth a vineyard.17She girdeth her loins with strength, and strengtheneth her arms.18She perceiveth that her merchandise is good: her candle goeth not out by night.19She layeth her hands to the spindle, and her hands hold the distaff.20She stretcheth out her hand to the poor; yea, she reacheth forth her hands to the needy.21She is not afraid of the snow for her household: for all her household are clothed with scarlet.22She maketh herself coverings of tapestry; her clothing is silk and purple.23Her husband is known in the gates, when he sitteth among the elders of the land.24She maketh fine linen, and selleth it; and delivereth girdles unto the merchant.25Strength and honour are her clothing; and she shall rejoice in time to come.26She openeth her mouth with wisdom; and in her tongue is the law of kindness.27She looketh well to the ways of her household, and eateth not the bread of idleness.28Her children arise up, and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praiseth her.29Many daughters have done virtuously, but thou excellest them all.30Favour is deceitful, and beauty is vain: but a woman that feareth the LORD, she shall be praised.31Give her of the fruit of her hands; and let her own works praise her in the gates.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proverbs chapter thirty-one verse 10 explains that a good wife is very hard to find Anti-Feminist believe that it is espisally true for the women of this day because of feminism and how to changed society to them for the worse. Proverbs eleven says that her husbands trust her so Anti-Feminists believe that they should be trust worthy to their husbands and believe it is because the wife submits to husbands is why the husbands trust his wife.It could also be interpreted to mean that the husband should be able to trust his wife and extend the borders of his estate so acquiring business acumen, accounting skills, and political knowledge would be a wise investment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Proverbs twelve specifically states '''&amp;quot;She will do him good and not evil all the days of her life&amp;quot;''' Anti-Feminist interpret this verse as women should be doing good for their husbands even if they don't who he is ''right now'' not after their maarried because that isn't what the nerse stated. One of the ways that Anti-Feminist believe that they can do their future husbands good right now is acquiring assets (skills) and excellent character to bring into the future marriage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Feminist interpret Proverbs thirteen to twenty-four to mean that the wife is very busy and isn't lazy. So they believe that they too shouldn't be lazy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The end of Proverbs states that the women who does this shall be praised by her children and husband. Her works will also be praised at the gate which could mean that the angels, Jesus, GOD will praise her works and good deeds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==First Timothy 5:14==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''14I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Younger women marry'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Younger women are by Anti-Feminist definition are suppose to marry young not only because that is when she is in her prime for attracting mates but also in bearing children.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Feminists are against women delaying marriage for unnecessary purposes like career for they believe that is selfish and unwise because sooner or later the woman's biological clock will begin to &amp;quot;tick&amp;quot; and the women that unwisely delayed marriage will have to cope with infertility. Another problem is when the women will want children she will most likely want marriage or the &amp;quot;whole package&amp;quot; to go with but will find it hard to find a mate because of her old age.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Bear children'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Feminist believe that ONE of the primary functions of women is to have children. The first command to men (Adam) and women (Eve) was &amp;quot;Be fruitful and multiply&amp;quot; also known as the &amp;quot;Domination mandate&amp;quot; '''28And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.''' &lt;br /&gt;
''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Be fruitful&amp;quot; Hebrew translation: Parah - to bear fruit to bring forth to increase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Multiply&amp;quot; Hebrew translation: Rabah - to increase exceedingly, to be many, to be abundant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Replenish Hebrew translation: Male - to fill up the world to over flowing.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Feminists relish the idea that they are &amp;quot;baby machines&amp;quot; as many feminists call them and most don't believe that the earth is being overpopulating stating that the earth was made for humans and if the world is overpopulating why would GOD tell them not to have children?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Guide the house'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interpreted as homemakers or managers of the home.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Women's Noblest Vocation==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many Anti-feminists believe that the most noblest vocation a women can aspire to is to be a ''helper to her husband, Mistress of a functional home and third to be the trainer of children.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Helpmate to her husband'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women in scripture are commanded to become helpmates to their husbands mainly because man, for all his abilities to lead and conquer cultures, cannot do so without woman's help.  In order for a man to lead he needs a helper. Whether a man leads badly or well can depend upon his helper. Women have a huge influence on men which can in turn effect the culture. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hebrew word &amp;quot;help&amp;quot; (ezer) [used in 'help meet'] comes from two roots: the first meaning to rescue or save, and  the second meaning strong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though the wife is devoted to her husband that doesn't make her his slave. The wife is the laborer in the work of the gospel, equal in essence, although subordinate in function. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;so much more&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Mistress of a functional home'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Apostle Paul rarely gave instruction specifically to young women, but one of the instances that he did so is in Titus 4,5:&amp;quot;...that they admonish the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, 5 to be discreet, chaste, '''homemakers''', good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God may not be blasphemed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Trainer of children'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Woman's work is the foundation for society, for the state, for the Kingdom of heaven. In the homes of America are born the children of America. Women are considered very important when it comes training children because they are mainly the ones that train them while the husband is working to support the family while the mother is supposedly at home.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A wise woman==&lt;br /&gt;
'''&lt;br /&gt;
Proverbs 14:1 The wise woman builds her house, But the foolish pulls it down with her hands.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women (from and anti-feminist viewpoint) have so much power in a marriage. Woman are believe to set the tone in the home if the women is kind to her husband and does not neglect the home children or the husband himself she &amp;quot;builds her house&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the women is constantly bring grief to her husband and neglecting her roles as a wife she &amp;quot;pulls it (home) down with her own hands.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following things are considered &amp;quot;Foolish&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Putting other things before God, children more important than husband, husband neglected, ministry at church (or other things) becomes an idol and first priorities are disregarded, not staying within your budget, downcast countenance, discontentment with the Lord's provisions, listening to lies from the enemy, Being enticed by the world (through music, media, magazines, television shows, you name it), focus on self or self pity, not asking husband before taking on new things, not managing our homes well, neglecting to train our children, never being home, gossip and slander, not filtering everything through scripture, coming up with excuses as to why we do the above.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://proverbs14verse1.blogspot.com/2007/05/foolish-woman.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anti-feminist views on feminism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-feminists understand that feminism is a danger to society. it is because of feminism we have we have unrestricted sex, the Pill, abortion on demand, an astronomically increased number of single mothers, teenage mothers and women in their 40's struggling with infertility; we have a fatherless generation who hasn't seen a better example; chastity is mocked, women are sexualized and coerced into selling themselves cheap; we have no-fault divorce, and deterioration of family &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;values.http://ccostello.blogspot.com/2007/05/feminism-vs-womens-rights.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anti-feminist views on abortion and birth control==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abortion is seen as a sin against God himself and children are seen as a blessing from the Lord.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3 Behold, children are a heritage from the LORD, The fruit of the womb is a reward.4 Like arrows in the hand of a warrior, So are the children of one’s youth. 5 Happy is the man who has his quiver full of them; They shall not be ashamed, But shall speak with their enemies in the gate.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the bible has said that children are a blessing they believe that it is good and to give up or prevent a blessing (birth control) is morally wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barrenness'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barrenness is considered a curse in the bible so not be able to have many children is seen as sorrowful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Garments==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Deuteronomy 22:5 - The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman’s garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the Lord thy God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the bible says that women and men shouldn't wear the same clothing they believe that women should retain to wearing modest skirts and dresses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Antifeminist organizations==&lt;br /&gt;
[[As of 2006]] the most successful antifeminist organization in the US is STOP ERA, founded by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] in October 1972. Schlafly successfully mobilised thousands of people to block the passage of the [[Equal Rights Amendment]] in the USA&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wse2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book | title=Women's Studies Encyclopedia| url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/unisouthernqld/Doc?id=10017897&amp;amp;ppg=106| last=Tierney| first=Helen|date=1999| pages=p. 95| publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group, Incorporated| location=Westport, CT, USA}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. It was Schlafly too who forged links between STOP ERA and other conservative organizations, as well as single-issue groups against abortion, pornography, gun control, and unions. By integrating STOP ERA with the so-called [[New Right]] she was able to leverage a wider range of technological, organisational and political resources, successfully targeting pro-feminist candidates for defeat&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wse2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book | title=Women's Studies Encyclopedia| url=http://site.ebrary.com/lib/unisouthernqld/Doc?id=10017897&amp;amp;ppg=106| last=Tierney| first=Helen|date=1999| pages=p. 95| publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group, Incorporated| location=Westport, CT, USA}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Antifeminist websites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===LadiesAgainstfeminism.com===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are many websites (and blogs) devoted to theory of anti-feminism. A popular website would be LadiesAgainstFeminism.com [http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/]. Founded by Mrs. Lydia Sherman and Mrs. Jennie Chancey in 2002 as a way to publish thoughtful, biblical responses to feminism and to encourage other women in their God-given roles &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/About_LAF_12/About_LAF_51005.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Ladies Against Feminism (or LAF) promotes biblical womanhood, motherhood, modesty, quiverfull and homeschooling. LAF has seventeen categories dedicated to the art of biblical womanhood to choose from.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===BiblicalWomanhoodOnline.com===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biblical Womanhood launched [http://www.biblicalwomanhoodonline.com/] in 2005 started as a ministry to &amp;quot;encourage and equip women and young women. Through our bookstore, articles, newsletter, and blog, we desire to promote femininity and build up women as they embrace their Biblical callings. In this humanistic, feministic culture, we want to be a breath of fresh air to women seeking after something greater than what the world has to offer&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.biblicalwomanhoodonline.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Her blog covers an array of topics from a antifeminist perspective, such as, abortion, politics, feminism, biblical womanhood, and more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
===Literature about antifeminism===&lt;br /&gt;
*''Redefining the New Woman, 1920-1963 (Antifeminism in America: A Collection of Readings from the Literature of the Opponents to U.S. Feminism, 1848 to the Present)'', Howard-Zophy&lt;br /&gt;
*''Un-American Womanhood: Antiradicalism, Antifeminism, and the First Red Scare'', Kim E. Nielsen&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Andrea Dworkin]], ''Right-Wing Women: The Politics of Domesticated Females'' (1983; ISBN 0-399-50671-3).&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Susan Faludi]], ''Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women'' (1992; ISBN 0-385-42507-4)&lt;br /&gt;
* Cynthia D. Kinnard, ''Antifeminism in American Thought: An Annotated Bibliography'' (Boston: G. K. Hall &amp;amp; Co., 1986, ISBN 0-8161-8122-5)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jane Mansbridge|Jane J. Mansbridge]]: ''Why We Lost the ERA,'' Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1986&lt;br /&gt;
* G. Swanson, ''Antifeminism in America: A Historical Reader'' (2000)  ISBN 0-8153-3437-0&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Antifeminist literature===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helen Andelin]], [[Fascinating Womanhood]] (2007) ISBN 0553384279&lt;br /&gt;
* Alan J. Barron, ''The Death of Eve: Women, Liberation, Disintegration'' (1986) ISBN 0949667366&lt;br /&gt;
* Alan Carlson, ''The Family in America: Searching for Social Harmony in the Industrial Age'' (2003) ISBN 0765805367&lt;br /&gt;
* Alan Carlson, ''Family Questions: Reflections on the American Social Crisis'' (1991) ISBN 1560005556&lt;br /&gt;
* [[G. K. Chesterton|Gilbert K. Chesterton]], ''Brave New Family'' (1990; essay collection) ISBN 089870314X &lt;br /&gt;
* Thomas Fleming, ''The Politics of Human Nature'' (1988) ISBN 1-56000-693-5&lt;br /&gt;
* Maggie Gallagher, ''The Abolition of Marriage: How We Destroy Lasting Love'' (1996) ISBN 0895264641&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Gilder]], ''Men and Marriage'' (1992) ISBN 0882894447&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Steven Goldberg]], ''[[Why Men Rule]]: A Theory of Male Dominance'' (1993; originally published 1971)  ISBN 0812692373&lt;br /&gt;
* Steven Goldberg, ''[[The Inevitability of Patriarchy]]'' (1977)  ISBN 0812692373&lt;br /&gt;
* F. Carolyn Graglia, ''Domestic Tranquility: A Brief Against Feminism'' (1998) ISBN 0965320863&lt;br /&gt;
* Mary A. Kassian, ''The Feminist Mistake'' (2005)  ISBN 1581345704&lt;br /&gt;
* Linda Kelly, [http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/304/kelly.pdf ''Disabusing the Definition of Domestic Abuse: How Women Batter Men and the Role of the Feminist State''] (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
* Myron Magnet, ''Modern Sex: Liberation and Its Discontents'' (2001)  ISBN 1566633842&lt;br /&gt;
* Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young ''Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture'' (2001) ISBN 0773522727&lt;br /&gt;
* Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young, '''''Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men''''' (2006) ISBN 0773528628&lt;br /&gt;
* John Piper and Wayne A. Grudem, ''Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood'' (1991) ISBN 0891075860&lt;br /&gt;
* Mary Pride, ''The Way Home: Beyond Feminism, Back to Reality'' (1985) ISBN 0891073450&lt;br /&gt;
* Phyllis Schlafly, ''The Power of the Positive Woman'' (1977)  ISBN 0-87000-373-9&lt;br /&gt;
* Phyllis Schlafly, ''Feminist Fantasies'' (2003)  ISBN 1890626465&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Schwartz, ''The Revolt of the Primitive: An Inquiry into the Roots of Political Correctness'' (2003)  ISBN 0765805375&lt;br /&gt;
* Lionel Tiger, ''The Decline of Males'' (2000)  ISBN 0312263112&lt;br /&gt;
* Esther Vilar, ''The Manipulated Man'' (1972) ISBN 0953096424&lt;br /&gt;
* Danielle Crittenden, ''What Our Mothers Didn't Tell Us'' (2000) ISBN 0-684-85959-9&lt;br /&gt;
* Midge Decter, ''The New Chastity and Other Arguments Against Women's Liberation'' (1974) ISBN 0-399-50307-2&lt;br /&gt;
* Thomas Ellis, [http://www.rannenbergpubs.com/ ''The Rantings of a Single Male''] (2005) ISBN 0-9762613-1-6&lt;br /&gt;
* Thomas Fleming, ''The Politics of Human Nature'' (1988) ISBN 1-56000-693-5&lt;br /&gt;
* Elizabeth Fox-Genovese, ''Feminism is Not the Story of My Life'' (1996) ISBN 0-385-46790-7 &lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Gilder]], ''Men and Marriage'' (1992) ISBN 0-88289-444-7&lt;br /&gt;
* F. Carolyn Graglia, ''Domestic Tranquility: A Brief Against Feminism'' (1998) ISBN 0-9653208-6-3&lt;br /&gt;
* Richard T. Hise, ''The War Against Men'' (2004) ISBN 1-930859-61-9&lt;br /&gt;
* Domestic Violence: The 12 Things You Aren't Supposed to Know; Thomas P. James, Aventine Press, 2003, ISBN 1-59330-122-7 &lt;br /&gt;
* Gertrude Himmelfarb, ''The De-moralization Of Society'' (1996) ISBN 0-679-76490-9&lt;br /&gt;
* Christina Hoff-Sommers, ''The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism is Harming Our Young Men'' (2001) ISBN 0-684-84957-7&lt;br /&gt;
* Christina Hoff-Sommers, ''Who Stole Feminism?'' (1995) ISBN 0-684-80156-6&lt;br /&gt;
* Mary A. Kassian, ''The Feminist Mistake'' (2005)  ISBN 1-58134-570-4&lt;br /&gt;
* Linda Kelly, [http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/304/kelly.pdf ''Disabusing the Definition of Domestic Abuse:   How Women Batter Men and the Role of the Feminist State''] (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
* The Female Thing: Dirt, Sex, Envy, Vulnerability, Laura Kipnis, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
* The Lipstick Proviso: Women, Sex &amp;amp; Power in the Real World; Karen Lehrman, 1997, ISBN 0-385-47481-4&lt;br /&gt;
* Myron Magnet, ''Modern Sex: Liberation and Its Discontents'' (2001)  ISBN 1-56663-384-2&lt;br /&gt;
* Harvey C. Mansfield, ''Manliness'' (2006) ISBN 0-300-10664-5&lt;br /&gt;
* Diane Medved and Dan Quayle,  ''The American Family: Discovering the Values That Make Us Strong'' (1997) ISBN 0-06-092810-7&lt;br /&gt;
* Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young, ''Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men'' (2006) ISBN 0-7735-2862-8&lt;br /&gt;
* Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young ''Spreading Misandry: The Teaching of Contempt for Men in Popular Culture'' (2001) ISBN 0-7735-2272-7&lt;br /&gt;
* Kate O'Beirne, ''Women Who Make the World Worse'' (2005) ISBN 1-59523-009-2&lt;br /&gt;
* John Piper and Wayne A. Grudem, ''Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood'' (1991) ISBN 0-89107-586-0&lt;br /&gt;
* Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies; Daphne Patai and Noreta Koertge, 1995, ISBN 0-465-09827-4&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Erin Pizzey]], [http://www.bennett.com/ptv/ ''Prone to Violence''] (Hamlyn, 1982; ISBN 0-600-20551-7)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mary Pride]], ''The Way Home: Beyond Feminism, Back to Reality'' (1985) ISBN 0-89107-345-0&lt;br /&gt;
* Phyllis Schlafly, ''Feminist Fantasies'' (2003)  ISBN 1-890626-46-5&lt;br /&gt;
* Howard Schwartz, ''The Revolt of the Primitive: An Inquiry into the Roots of Political Correctness'' (2003)  ISBN 0-7658-0537-5&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Philip Gordon Wylie]], ''A Generation of Vipers'' (1942) ISBN 1-56478-146-1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Antifeminist advocates==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Erica Catrina D'Alessandro]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Helen Andelin]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ernest Belfort Bax]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Caitlin Flanagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[George Gilder]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jim Goad]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Makow]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adam Norton]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mary Pride]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Phyllis Schlafly]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dave Sim]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mary Augusta Ward]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Otto Weininger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Philip Gordon Wylie]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Jennie Chancey &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Stacy McDonald &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;www.yoursacredcalling.blogspot.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*R.C. Sproul &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ligonier.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti-suffrage]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Masculism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Men's rights|Men's Rights]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Feminazi]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Misogyny]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Patriarchy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www-personal.umich.edu/~eandersn/hownotreview.html How ''Not'' to Criticize Feminist Epistemology], by Elizabeth Anderson, review of &amp;quot;Scrutinizing Feminist Epistemology&amp;quot; concluding &amp;quot;[it is a] failure by its own evaluative standards of civility and avoiding gross error, tribalism, cynicism, and political correctness.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/ Ladies Against Feminism]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[s:Transwiki:Dave Sim Tangent|&amp;quot;Tangent&amp;quot; by Dave Sim]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.biblicalwomanhoodonline.com/ Biblical Womanhood]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.adlynmorrison.blogspot.com/ The Posthumous Papers of the Late Adlyn Morrison]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.cbmw.org/ The Council of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.antifeminism-international.org/?lang=en Antifeminism Worldwide] - Antifeminist network&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://en.wikimannia.org WikiMANNia] - Wiki about the favorising of women and discrimination against men in politics and society&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Feminism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Anti-feminism&amp;diff=897320</id>
		<title>Talk:Anti-feminism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Anti-feminism&amp;diff=897320"/>
		<updated>2011-08-04T16:54:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /* Antifeminism Websites */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello I hope you enjoy the article. I saw a piece on feminism but yet to see on on Anti-Feminism so I decided to take the liberty and do it my self. Feel free to edit as needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wow... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I knew my article wasn't professionally written but why is it up for deletion? I did nothing wrong. I wrote the entire thing myself and I see no reason for my article to be deleted. Feel free to EDIT NOT DELETE!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
Read the history, the reason is you copied from wikipedia, which is against Conservapedia policies. What don't you try to make you own work.--[[User:TagoPagdaluhong|TagoPagdaluhong]] 01:23, 8 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
HA HA HA HA! um hello, I am the one to put Anti-Feminism on Wikipedia in the first place. So it is MY WORK I transferred to Conservapedia because my article was deleted on Wikipedia for reasons I don't know. So please everyone stop deleting my work! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. Wikipedia decided to put my article up again for some reason. If the problem is that Wikipedia has my article as well that I wrote then I will freely delete it seeing how it is my work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Yoshi3329|Yoshi3329]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
My bad, I undo for you--[[User:TagoPagdaluhong|TagoPagdaluhong]] 01:32, 8 May 2008 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks sorry for the misunderstanding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Yoshi3329|Yoshi3329]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Posthumous Papers website is defunct. So is the biblical womanhood website. The LAF website is being updated still.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Antifeminism Websites ==&lt;br /&gt;
Antifeminism Worldwide&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.antifeminism-international.org/?lang=en&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WikiMANNia (english)&lt;br /&gt;
* http://en.wikimannia.org&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:MWS|MWS]] 12:54, 4 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=893830</id>
		<title>User talk:MWS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=893830"/>
		<updated>2011-07-27T17:16:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /* Information wanted */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about blocking you. I realized I made a mistake as soon as I saw your contributions. It's just that often spammers will fill their userpages with external links. Welcome to Conservapedia, though!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 22:35, 26 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't want to disturb here! I just registrate for fixing a little mistake in writing.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What I'm doing here ==&lt;br /&gt;
I came here around, becase I'm hoster of an antifeminist (german) website and editor in a wiki-encyclopedia (WikiMANNia), that is antifeminist too. At the moment I try to launch an english version of WikiMANNia and for this I'm looking for what is going on in USA and so I found your site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this way, I inserted two articles in german WikiMANNia, as you can see on my user page. I tried to translate the article about conservapedia into english, but my english is not really perfect. You may have a look for mistake in writing? Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our main topics in WikiMANNia are: Critics on Feminism, Antifeminism, Discrimination against Men, Preferential treatment of Women, Genderism, Family, Destruccion of Familys, Divorce, Family law, Newspeach, Femispeach, Genderspeach and some topics around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will look around in Conservapedia and hope to find good material for our work. --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Translations ==&lt;br /&gt;
I need some keywords (for better searching) in english:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Familienzerstörer&lt;br /&gt;
: Destroyer of Families&lt;br /&gt;
; Familienzerstörunf&lt;br /&gt;
: Destruccion of Families&lt;br /&gt;
; Feminismuskritik&lt;br /&gt;
: Critic on Feminism&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenbevorzugung&lt;br /&gt;
: Preferential treatment of Women&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenförderung&lt;br /&gt;
: The political motivated Promotion of Women&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenquote&lt;br /&gt;
: female quota, women's quota, quota of women&lt;br /&gt;
; Genderismus&lt;br /&gt;
: Genderism, Ideology of Gender Mainstream&lt;br /&gt;
; Helferinnenindustrie&lt;br /&gt;
: The business of the helper, the industrie of helping, make money with so called victims and discriminated.&lt;br /&gt;
; Lila Pudel&lt;br /&gt;
: A man supporting the &amp;quot;ideology of feminism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
; Männerbenachteiligung&lt;br /&gt;
: Discrimination against Men&lt;br /&gt;
; Opferkultur&lt;br /&gt;
: The Culture of the Victims: The Helferinnenindustrie promotes this culture to see everywhere victims and generate more victims by declaring them victims (or discriminated) for getting more benefit of the business.&lt;br /&gt;
; Scheidungswaise&lt;br /&gt;
: Ohrpan by divorce, the fate of a child loosing his mother or (most often) his father due to the divorce of its parents&lt;br /&gt;
; Unterhaltsmaximierungsprinzip&lt;br /&gt;
: Principle of maximize the Alimony by Lawmaker, Feminists and Judges.&lt;br /&gt;
; Wechselmodell &lt;br /&gt;
: Custody for divorced parent: Caring of the Child 50:50 by mother AND father also AFTER Divorce.&lt;br /&gt;
; Neusprech&lt;br /&gt;
: Newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
; Femisprech&lt;br /&gt;
: Femispeak&lt;br /&gt;
; Gläserne Decke&lt;br /&gt;
: Glass ceiling&lt;br /&gt;
; Gläserner Keller&lt;br /&gt;
: Glass cellar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Newspeak&amp;quot; is probably better than &amp;quot;Newspeach&amp;quot; - if you mean it in the 1984 sense. [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:25, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Yes, of course. Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is where in USA a specific word for &amp;quot;masculine feminism-defender&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;feminism-supporter&amp;quot; what we called in Germany a &amp;quot;Lila Pudel&amp;quot;? --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 12:53, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Information wanted ==&lt;br /&gt;
Do you have any articles about:&lt;br /&gt;
* Antifeminism&lt;br /&gt;
* Basic doctrines of feminism&lt;br /&gt;
* Women's quota&lt;br /&gt;
* Women in the army&lt;br /&gt;
* Fathers 4 Justice&lt;br /&gt;
* Glass ceiling&lt;br /&gt;
* Glass cellar&lt;br /&gt;
* False charges (Case Kachelmann, Dominique Strauss-Kahn)&lt;br /&gt;
* Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS)&lt;br /&gt;
or something related? --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 13:16, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=893826</id>
		<title>User talk:MWS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=893826"/>
		<updated>2011-07-27T16:53:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: What is a &amp;quot;masculine feminism-defender&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;feminism-supporter&amp;quot; called?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about blocking you. I realized I made a mistake as soon as I saw your contributions. It's just that often spammers will fill their userpages with external links. Welcome to Conservapedia, though!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 22:35, 26 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't want to disturb here! I just registrate for fixing a little mistake in writing.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What I'm doing here ==&lt;br /&gt;
I came here around, becase I'm hoster of an antifeminist (german) website and editor in a wiki-encyclopedia (WikiMANNia), that is antifeminist too. At the moment I try to launch an english version of WikiMANNia and for this I'm looking for what is going on in USA and so I found your site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this way, I inserted two articles in german WikiMANNia, as you can see on my user page. I tried to translate the article about conservapedia into english, but my english is not really perfect. You may have a look for mistake in writing? Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our main topics in WikiMANNia are: Critics on Feminism, Antifeminism, Discrimination against Men, Preferential treatment of Women, Genderism, Family, Destruccion of Familys, Divorce, Family law, Newspeach, Femispeach, Genderspeach and some topics around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will look around in Conservapedia and hope to find good material for our work. --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Translations ==&lt;br /&gt;
I need some keywords (for better searching) in english:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Familienzerstörer&lt;br /&gt;
: Destroyer of Families&lt;br /&gt;
; Familienzerstörunf&lt;br /&gt;
: Destruccion of Families&lt;br /&gt;
; Feminismuskritik&lt;br /&gt;
: Critic on Feminism&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenbevorzugung&lt;br /&gt;
: Preferential treatment of Women&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenförderung&lt;br /&gt;
: The political motivated Promotion of Women&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenquote&lt;br /&gt;
: female quota, women's quota, quota of women&lt;br /&gt;
; Genderismus&lt;br /&gt;
: Genderism, Ideology of Gender Mainstream&lt;br /&gt;
; Helferinnenindustrie&lt;br /&gt;
: The business of the helper, the industrie of helping, make money with so called victims and discriminated.&lt;br /&gt;
; Lila Pudel&lt;br /&gt;
: A man supporting the &amp;quot;ideology of feminism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
; Männerbenachteiligung&lt;br /&gt;
: Discrimination against Men&lt;br /&gt;
; Opferkultur&lt;br /&gt;
: The Culture of the Victims: The Helferinnenindustrie promotes this culture to see everywhere victims and generate more victims by declaring them victims (or discriminated) for getting more benefit of the business.&lt;br /&gt;
; Scheidungswaise&lt;br /&gt;
: Ohrpan by divorce, the fate of a child loosing his mother or (most often) his father due to the divorce of its parents&lt;br /&gt;
; Unterhaltsmaximierungsprinzip&lt;br /&gt;
: Principle of maximize the Alimony by Lawmaker, Feminists and Judges.&lt;br /&gt;
; Wechselmodell &lt;br /&gt;
: Custody for divorced parent: Caring of the Child 50:50 by mother AND father also AFTER Divorce.&lt;br /&gt;
; Neusprech&lt;br /&gt;
: Newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
; Femisprech&lt;br /&gt;
: Femispeak&lt;br /&gt;
; Gläserne Decke&lt;br /&gt;
: Glass ceiling&lt;br /&gt;
; Gläserner Keller&lt;br /&gt;
: Glass cellar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Newspeak&amp;quot; is probably better than &amp;quot;Newspeach&amp;quot; - if you mean it in the 1984 sense. [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:25, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Yes, of course. Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
::: Is where in USA a specific word for &amp;quot;masculine feminism-defender&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;feminism-supporter&amp;quot; what we called in Germany a &amp;quot;Lila Pudel&amp;quot;? --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 12:53, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=893800</id>
		<title>User talk:MWS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=893800"/>
		<updated>2011-07-27T14:18:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /* I need some keywords in english */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about blocking you. I realized I made a mistake as soon as I saw your contributions. It's just that often spammers will fill their userpages with external links. Welcome to Conservapedia, though!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 22:35, 26 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't want to disturb here! I just registrate for fixing a little mistake in writing.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What I'm doing here ==&lt;br /&gt;
I came here around, becase I'm hoster of an antifeminist (german) website and editor in a wiki-encyclopedia (WikiMANNia), that is antifeminist too. At the moment I try to launch an english version of WikiMANNia and for this I'm looking for what is going on in USA and so I found your site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this way, I inserted two articles in german WikiMANNia, as you can see on my user page. I tried to translate the article about conservapedia into english, but my english is not really perfect. You may have a look for mistake in writing? Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our main topics in WikiMANNia are: Critics on Feminism, Antifeminism, Discrimination against Men, Preferential treatment of Women, Genderism, Family, Destruccion of Familys, Divorce, Family law, Newspeach, Femispeach, Genderspeach and some topics around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will look around in Conservapedia and hope to find good material for our work. --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Translations ==&lt;br /&gt;
I need some keywords (for better searching) in english:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Familienzerstörer&lt;br /&gt;
: Destroyer of Families&lt;br /&gt;
; Familienzerstörunf&lt;br /&gt;
: Destruccion of Families&lt;br /&gt;
; Feminismuskritik&lt;br /&gt;
: Critic on Feminism&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenbevorzugung&lt;br /&gt;
: Preferential treatment of Women&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenförderung&lt;br /&gt;
: The political motivated Promotion of Women&lt;br /&gt;
; Frauenquote&lt;br /&gt;
: female quota, women's quota, quota of women&lt;br /&gt;
; Genderismus&lt;br /&gt;
: Genderism, Ideology of Gender Mainstream&lt;br /&gt;
; Helferinnenindustrie&lt;br /&gt;
: The business of the helper, the industrie of helping, make money with so called victims and discriminated.&lt;br /&gt;
; Lila Pudel&lt;br /&gt;
: A man supporting the &amp;quot;ideology of feminism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
; Männerbenachteiligung&lt;br /&gt;
: Discrimination against Men&lt;br /&gt;
; Opferkultur&lt;br /&gt;
: The Culture of the Victims: The Helferinnenindustrie promotes this culture to see everywhere victims and generate more victims by declaring them victims (or discriminated) for getting more benefit of the business.&lt;br /&gt;
; Scheidungswaise&lt;br /&gt;
: Ohrpan by divorce, the fate of a child loosing his mother or (most often) his father due to the divorce of its parents&lt;br /&gt;
; Unterhaltsmaximierungsprinzip&lt;br /&gt;
: Principle of maximize the Alimony by Lawmaker, Feminists and Judges.&lt;br /&gt;
; Wechselmodell &lt;br /&gt;
: Custody for divorced parent: Caring of the Child 50:50 by mother AND father also AFTER Divorce.&lt;br /&gt;
; Neusprech&lt;br /&gt;
: Newspeach&lt;br /&gt;
; Femisprech&lt;br /&gt;
: Femispeach&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=893795</id>
		<title>User talk:MWS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:MWS&amp;diff=893795"/>
		<updated>2011-07-27T13:49:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: What I'm doing here&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry about blocking you. I realized I made a mistake as soon as I saw your contributions. It's just that often spammers will fill their userpages with external links. Welcome to Conservapedia, though!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 22:35, 26 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't want to disturb here! I just registrate for fixing a little mistake in writing.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== What I'm doing here ==&lt;br /&gt;
I came here around, becase I'm hoster of an antifeminist (german) website and editor in a wiki-encyclopedia (WikiMANNia), that is antifeminist too. At the moment I try to launch an english version of WikiMANNia and for this I'm looking for what is going on in USA and so I found your site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this way, I inserted two articles in german WikiMANNia, as you can see on my user page. I tried to translate the article about conservapedia into english, but my english is not really perfect. You may have a look for mistake in writing? Thank you!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our main topics in WikiMANNia are: Critics on Feminism, Antifeminism, Discrimination against Men, Preferential treatment of Women, Genderism, Family, Destruccion of Familys, Divorce, Family law, Newspeach, Femispeach, Genderspeach and some topics around.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I will look around in Conservapedia and hope to find good material for our work. --[[User:MWS|MWS]] 09:49, 27 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:MWS&amp;diff=893794</id>
		<title>User:MWS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:MWS&amp;diff=893794"/>
		<updated>2011-07-27T13:35:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: Adding 2 articles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Antifeminism Worldwide - Section Germany&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.antifeminism-international.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WikiMANNia&lt;br /&gt;
* http://wikimannia.org (german)&lt;br /&gt;
**http://wikimannia.org/Conservapedia&lt;br /&gt;
**http://wikimannia.org/Phyllis_Schlafly&lt;br /&gt;
* http://en.wikimannia.org (english)&lt;br /&gt;
**http://en.wikimannia.org/index.php?title=Conservapedia&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:MWS&amp;diff=893698</id>
		<title>User:MWS</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:MWS&amp;diff=893698"/>
		<updated>2011-07-27T00:46:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: Created page with &amp;quot;Antifeminism Worldwide - Section Germany * http://www.antifeminism-international.org  WikiMANNia * http://wikimannia.org (german) * http://en.wikimannia.org (english)&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Antifeminism Worldwide - Section Germany&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.antifeminism-international.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WikiMANNia&lt;br /&gt;
* http://wikimannia.org (german)&lt;br /&gt;
* http://en.wikimannia.org (english)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Secularized_Language&amp;diff=893696</id>
		<title>Secularized Language</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Secularized_Language&amp;diff=893696"/>
		<updated>2011-07-27T00:43:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;MWS: /* Historical Examples */ typo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;While [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words|the development of conservative words grows by doubling each century]], those with an [[anti-Christian]] and [[anti-American]] agenda, such as [[liberal]]s, [[homosexual]]s, [[atheist]]s, [[evolutionist]]s and [[leftist]]s, have attempted to remove the [[Christian]] origins of our '''[[language]]''' by replacing common phrases with '''[[secular]]ized''' versions.  By appealing to [[tolerance]] and [[political correctness]], they have succeeded in propagating these secularized versions, even among those who don't share their views.  Such [[deceit]]ful tactics are a prime example of [[Liberal redefinition]] and other [[Liberal tools]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=='''Calendar Terms'''==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Original expression&lt;br /&gt;
!Secularized version&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|B.C./A.D.&lt;br /&gt;
|B.C.E./[[C.E.]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christ's Mass&lt;br /&gt;
|Christmas &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=Christmas&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christmas&lt;br /&gt;
|Xmas&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christmas Holiday&lt;br /&gt;
|Winter Break&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easter Holiday&lt;br /&gt;
|Spring Break&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gregorian calendar&lt;br /&gt;
|Civil calendar&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|All Hallow's Eve&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;All Hallow's Eve was originally the pre-Roman pagan Celtic holiday of Samhain's Day. In 835 Pope Gregory IV moved All Saint's Day, which celebrates the lives of Catholic martyrs and the communion of saints, to November 1. Thus, Halloween is not itself a Christian holiday, but the evening before the Catholic feast day. [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01315a.htm] [http://www.americancatholic.org/Messenger/Oct2001/Family.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Halloween&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Holy Day&lt;br /&gt;
|Holiday &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=holiday&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Independence Day&lt;br /&gt;
|The Fourth of July&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Merry Christmas&lt;br /&gt;
|Happy Holidays/Season's Greetings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Resurrection Sunday&lt;br /&gt;
|Easter&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Saint Patrick's Day&lt;br /&gt;
|Paddy's Day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Saint Valentine's Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Valentine's Day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Shrove Tuesday&lt;br /&gt;
|Fat Tuesday, Mardi Gras, Carnival&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thanksgiving&lt;br /&gt;
|Turkey Day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The Reverend Martin Luther King Day&lt;br /&gt;
|MLK Day &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c103:6:./temp/~c103JkPHc3::&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Washington's Birthday&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|President's Day&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=='''Expressions and Colloquialisms'''==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Original expression&lt;br /&gt;
!Secularized version&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God be with you&lt;br /&gt;
|Good luck&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God be with you&lt;br /&gt;
|Goodbye&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God bless you/Bless you&lt;br /&gt;
|Gesundheit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Godspeed&lt;br /&gt;
|Be good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God Willing&lt;br /&gt;
|Hopefully&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jesus!&lt;br /&gt;
|Gee whiz!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|One nation under God&lt;br /&gt;
|One nation&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Praise the Lord&lt;br /&gt;
|Praise be&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thank God!&lt;br /&gt;
|Thank Goodness!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thank heavens&lt;br /&gt;
|Thank goodness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thank the Lord&lt;br /&gt;
|Give thanks&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=='''General Examples'''==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Original expression&lt;br /&gt;
!Secularized version&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Abomination&lt;br /&gt;
|Homosexual/Gay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Abomination&lt;br /&gt;
|Mistake&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|Birth control&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Act of God&lt;br /&gt;
|Natural disaster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Adultery&lt;br /&gt;
|Cheating&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Adultery&lt;br /&gt;
|Fooling around&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Angelic&lt;br /&gt;
|Pretty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Christian bigotry&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Separation of church and state]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-life&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bible study&lt;br /&gt;
|Fundamentalism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blasphemy &lt;br /&gt;
|Secular opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blessed&lt;br /&gt;
|Lucky&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chosen lifestyle&lt;br /&gt;
|Innate characteristic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Constitutionalist&lt;br /&gt;
|Birther&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Contraception&lt;br /&gt;
|Protection&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Covetousness&lt;br /&gt;
|Inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Creation&lt;br /&gt;
|Abiogenesis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Curse&lt;br /&gt;
|Bad luck&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Disciple of Christ&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Diabolical&lt;br /&gt;
|Dishonest/Underhanded&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Drunkard&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Alcoholic]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Easter Egg&lt;br /&gt;
|Spring Sphere[http://www.mynorthwest.com/?nid=11&amp;amp;sid=459668], Chocolate Egg&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Father&lt;br /&gt;
|Old man&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Fertile&lt;br /&gt;
|Breeder&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Flood&lt;br /&gt;
|Flooding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Flood&lt;br /&gt;
|Flood waters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Glory&lt;br /&gt;
|Praise&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God&lt;br /&gt;
|A higher power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God&lt;br /&gt;
|Mother Nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God-fearing&lt;br /&gt;
|Intolerant&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God-given&lt;br /&gt;
|Natural&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Godless&lt;br /&gt;
|Secular&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Golden Rule&lt;br /&gt;
|Altruism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Govern&lt;br /&gt;
|Rule&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Harlot&lt;br /&gt;
|Sex worker&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Harlot&lt;br /&gt;
|Prostitute&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Harlot&lt;br /&gt;
|Slut&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Harlot&lt;br /&gt;
|Empowerment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Harlot&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberated woman&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Heathen&lt;br /&gt;
|Multicultural&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hell]] (or Heaven)&lt;br /&gt;
|Afterlife&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Heavenly&lt;br /&gt;
|Beautiful&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Heresy&lt;br /&gt;
|Scientific theory&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Heretic&lt;br /&gt;
|Crackpot&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Holy matrimony&lt;br /&gt;
|Civil union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Homosexual&lt;br /&gt;
|Gay&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Homosexuality&lt;br /&gt;
|Lifestyle choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Husband or wife&lt;br /&gt;
|Significant other/life partner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Immoral&lt;br /&gt;
|Personal choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Islamic Terrorism&lt;br /&gt;
|Man-made disaster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lazy&lt;br /&gt;
|Lacks motivation &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Living in sin&lt;br /&gt;
|Shacking up/cohabitation/domestic partnership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mankind&lt;br /&gt;
|Humankind&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Meek&lt;br /&gt;
|Weak &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Miraculous&lt;br /&gt;
|Amazing&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Mother&lt;br /&gt;
|Parent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nation&lt;br /&gt;
|Country/State/Government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nature&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Social construct]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pagan&lt;br /&gt;
|Secular&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Perversion&lt;br /&gt;
|Diversity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Possessed&lt;br /&gt;
|Crazy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Possessed&lt;br /&gt;
|Influenced&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pray&lt;br /&gt;
|Plead&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Prayer/blessing&lt;br /&gt;
|Moment of silence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Providence&lt;br /&gt;
|Lucky break&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rebuke&lt;br /&gt;
|Hate speech&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Reckoning&lt;br /&gt;
|Accountability&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Religion&lt;br /&gt;
|Spirituality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Righteous&lt;br /&gt;
|Law-abiding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sacred&lt;br /&gt;
|Respected&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sanctify&lt;br /&gt;
|Set apart&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Jeremiah 1:5 in the [[Feminist Bible]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Saintly&lt;br /&gt;
|Well-behaved&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sex before marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberated&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sin&lt;br /&gt;
|Crime&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sin&lt;br /&gt;
|Lifestyle Choice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sodomite (generally)&lt;br /&gt;
|Gay; LGBT&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sodomite (in antiquity)&lt;br /&gt;
|Male shrine prostitute&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sodomy&lt;br /&gt;
|Relations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Solemn&lt;br /&gt;
|Dignified&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Son/Daughter&lt;br /&gt;
|Offspring&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Soul&lt;br /&gt;
|Spirit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The State&lt;br /&gt;
|The Government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Terrorist&lt;br /&gt;
|Freedom fighter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Unborn baby&lt;br /&gt;
|Fetus&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Virgin&lt;br /&gt;
|Young woman&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Wicked&lt;br /&gt;
|Antisocial&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Wicked&lt;br /&gt;
|Naughty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Witchcraft&lt;br /&gt;
|Wicca, (Neo-)Pagan&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|With child&lt;br /&gt;
|Pregnant&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=='''Names'''==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Original expression&lt;br /&gt;
!Secularized version&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Augustine&lt;br /&gt;
|August&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian Name&lt;br /&gt;
|Given Name, First Name&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting in 1933 [[Nazi]] [[Germany]] had a program to secularize the German language. The Nazis themselves called it ''Sprachregelung'' (regulation of language). The Sprachregelung was mainly directed by the ''Reichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda'' (RMVP) (Ministry for the enlightenment of the people and propaganda). While the RMVP concentrated mainly on controlling and censoring the language of the media and the language used in movies and other cultural ventures, there were other actions as well. The Nazi governement published a new dictionary, which contained only secularized language, that was in unison with the parties ideology.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;The sad culmination of the ''Sprachregelung'' was in the vocabulary for the ''Endlösung''. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;''Humans'' became ''units'', ''murder'' became ''deportation'' etc.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gerd Simon (Universität Tübingen): Art, Auslese, Ausmerze... etc.: Ein bisher unbekanntes Wörterbuch-Unternehmen aus dem SS-Hauptamt im Kontext der Weltanschauungslexika des 3. Reichs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[George Orwell]]'s [[1984]] describes how a tyrannical government changes language to entrench its power. This is done by the so called ''Newspeak''. Newspeak is a slimmed down version of normal English. Its goal is to prevent the speaker forming thoughts like rebellion or dislike against the government or one of its leaders. Even if an individual would be able to form such thoughts, it would be impossible to communicate them to others using Newspeak. Orwell's description of newspeak was heavily influenced by the language controls of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Sometimes C.E. is an abbreviation for &amp;quot;Christian era&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;common era&amp;quot;, but this [[CE|also conceals the historical basis]] due to Jesus Christ being Jewish. Christianity would not exist as a separate religion until much later.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; The 'X' in &amp;quot;Xmas&amp;quot; was originally an abbreviation for the Greek letter &amp;quot;chi&amp;quot; translated as &amp;quot;Ch&amp;quot;, though the abbreviation eventually became a means of &amp;quot;[[Liberal censorship|crossing out Christ]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Easter was originally a pagan festival, upon which Christianity would later apply the [[Resurrection]] of Christ and surrounding events (such as the [[Crucifixion]] on [[Good Friday]]). &amp;quot;Resurrection Sunday&amp;quot; is often used to emphasize the Resurrection of Christ rather than the pagan holiday.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; Washington's Birthday was February 11th in the Julian calendar, while Lincoln's Birthday was February 12th in the Gregorian. Under the Gregorian calendar, Washington's Birthday would be February 22nd. Thus Washington's birthday would be more accurate. ([http://usparks.about.com/od/historicalparks/a/Presidents-Day.htm source])&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;5&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; This was part of the original [[Pledge of Allegiance]]. &amp;quot;Under God&amp;quot; was added in the 1950s at the request of President [[Eisenhower]]. ([http://www.ushistory.org/documents/pledge.htm source]) However, atheists such as [[Michael Newdow]] have been trying to remove the phrase &amp;quot;under God&amp;quot; from the Pledge through the federal courts ([http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=138325 source])&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;6&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; [[Pro-choice]] people often use the phrase &amp;quot;birth control&amp;quot; regardless of whether conception has occurred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal creep]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Opposition to Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Contrast with [[Essay:Best New Conservative Words]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>MWS</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>