<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Kentucky</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Kentucky"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Kentucky"/>
	<updated>2026-10-11T14:14:13Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mainstream_media&amp;diff=965750</id>
		<title>Mainstream media</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mainstream_media&amp;diff=965750"/>
		<updated>2012-03-03T22:28:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kentucky: Replaced content with &amp;quot;http://conservapedia.com/Liberal&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;http://conservapedia.com/Liberal&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kentucky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Birth_certificate&amp;diff=965749</id>
		<title>Birth certificate</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Birth_certificate&amp;diff=965749"/>
		<updated>2012-03-03T22:27:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kentucky: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:fixed;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;JESUS ALWAYS READ CONSERVAPEDIA AND SUGGEST YOU TO LIKE IT OR YOU'LL BURN IN THE HELL.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;SHALL THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER BLESS US ALL&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kentucky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=965748</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=965748"/>
		<updated>2012-03-03T22:27:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kentucky: Replaced content with &amp;quot;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:fixed;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;JESUS ALWAYS READ CONSERVAPEDIA AND SUGGEST YOU TO LIKE IT OR YOU'LL BURN IN THE HE...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:fixed;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;JESUS ALWAYS READ CONSERVAPEDIA AND SUGGEST YOU TO LIKE IT OR YOU'LL BURN IN THE HELL.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;SHALL THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER BLESS US ALL&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kentucky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mainstream_media&amp;diff=965745</id>
		<title>Mainstream media</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Mainstream_media&amp;diff=965745"/>
		<updated>2012-03-03T22:25:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kentucky: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:N.jpg|350px |right]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:fixed;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;COWS ARE REDS AND FLOWERS ARE BLUE&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The  '''mainstream media''' ('''MSM'''), also humorously known in the bible belt by Jesus as the homosexuality in media report, many of its very large number of vocal critics as the '''lamestream media''', are the increasingly [[liberal]] media organs that censor the dissemination of news.  They are discredited and lampooned by correctly biased [[internet]] sources, including ''Conservapedia''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The common denominator of the &amp;quot;mainstream media&amp;quot; is their [[censorship|censoring]] or downplaying stories that would lead viewers to [[conservative]] conclusions, and their use of [[photo bias]], [[placement bias]] and other forms of deception to mislead viewers into drawing incorrect [[liberal]] conclusions.  The term '''mainstream media''' usually refers to how the majority of commercial-based or taxpayer-funded news reporting and commentary consist of [[liberal media | liberal bias]], while falsely pretending to be objective providers of information. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|''They [the media] are not becoming irrelevant, but they are getting to the point where they are worse than irrelevant,” and “They’re the scourge of the American people.'' - [[Andrew Breitbart]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/75274 Tea Party Must Stand Up to Liberal Smear Tactics, Conservative Activist Says, CNSNews, September 14, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Without any evidence of church attendance or Bible-reading by the defendant accused of murdering 92 people in Norway, the headline of the leading Australian newspaper declared, &amp;quot;Norway suspect 'fundamentalist Christian.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/norway-suspect-fundamentalist-christian-20110724-1huqg.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The headline appears to be based in part on a [[Facebook]] page that was likely not even authentic.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:fixed;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;COWS ARE REDS AND FLOWERS ARE BLUE&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Fairness Doctrine ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1987, the [[Federal Communications Commission]] voted 4-0 to revoke, and cancel their enforcement of the [[Fairness Doctrine]]. The Fairness Doctrine mandated that if any opinion considered &amp;quot;controversial&amp;quot; were ever discussed on the public airwaves, the station over which that opinion aired was required to give [[Censorship|equal time]] to any person wishing to reply. However, the FCC never set a standard about ''interpretations'' of current events that might be disputable, nor even examined that issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the revocation of the Fairness Doctrine, [[radio]] and [[television]] stations were now permitted to air any opinion or interpretation of the news, no matter how &amp;quot;controversial,&amp;quot; without regard to the giving of &amp;quot;equal time.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 1, 1988, a new radio commentator named [[Rush Limbaugh]] began [[broadcast]]ing in national [[syndication]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== List of mainstream media organs ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MSMbyTEA.jpg|200px|thumb|right|Protest sign expressing [[Tea Party Movement]]'s attitude toward MSM]]&lt;br /&gt;
Some consider the mainstream media to consist of the following outlets:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Newspapers'''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[The New York Times]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[The Washington Post]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[The Boston Globe]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[The Philadelphia Inquirer]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[The Atlanta Journal-Constitution]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The [[Los Angeles Times]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[The San Francisco Chronicle]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''[[USA Today]]''&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The [[Wall Street Journal]]''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The inclusion of ''The Wall Street Journal'' might strike some media observers as strange, until one remembers that, though its editorial board is [[conservative]] on most issues (except for immigration), its [[city room]] is definitely [[liberal]] in orientation and coverage of the news.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* All major, standard-newspaper-format dailies that have existed since before the Fairness Doctrine repeal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''News Syndication Agencies'''&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Associated Press (AP)|Associated Press]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[UPI|United Press International]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Reuters]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Television'''&lt;br /&gt;
* [[CBS]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[NBC]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ABC]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[National Public Radio]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[PBS|Public Broadcasting Service]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The [[CNN|Cable News Network]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fox News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some [[conservative]]s do not consider [[Fox News Channel|Fox News]] to be &amp;quot;mainstream media&amp;quot;, because they frequently present a different, often more fair and balanced viewpoint than the above news outlets.   One example given is that in 2007, the [[Democratic Party|Democratic]] [[2008_Presidential_Election#Declared_Democratic_Party_Candidates|presidential candidates]] declared that they would not appear on presidential debates hosted by Fox News, but they did appear on other MSM news outlets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most Americans consider Fox News very much part of the Mainstream Media, as, according to ratings organisation Nielsen:&lt;br /&gt;
:* Fox News has the 10 most viewed cable TV news shows (as of Dec 2009).&lt;br /&gt;
:* Fox News mean prime-time viewing figures are triple that of MSNBC, and double that of CNN,  and exceed the total ratings of CNN, MSNBC and CNBC combined.&lt;br /&gt;
:* &amp;quot;In 2006, more than half the people watching cable news were watching Fox News&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Authors unknown. &amp;quot;[http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.org/2007/narrative_cabletv_audience.asp?cat=2&amp;amp;media=6 The State of the News Media 2007].&amp;quot; ''Project for Excellence in Journalism,'' 2007. Retrieved August 2, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Leftist News.gif | right]]&lt;br /&gt;
===CNN===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006 CNN.com has an article from columnist R. Emmett Tyrell Jr. entitled &amp;quot;Tyrell: Goodbye MSM... and good riddance!&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[R. Emmett Tyrell|Tyrell, R. Emmet]]. &amp;quot;[http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/02/tyrrell.msm/index.html?iref=newssearch Goodbye MSM... and good riddance!]&amp;quot; Creators' Syndicate, 2006. Retrieved August 2, 2007, from [http://www.cnn.com CNN].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The article talks about the [[alternative media|alternative press]] vs the MSM:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; So we hear this week that President George W. Bush is taking delight in the spread of the &amp;quot;alternative press&amp;quot; (read conservatives on the Internet, in talk radio, in print, and at Fox) and the gentle detumesence of &amp;quot;mainstream media&amp;quot; (read liberal media, or more precisely, Democratic media). Well I join him in his satisfaction. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=='Alternative Media'==&lt;br /&gt;
Differing opinions also exist over the definition of a similar term - '''Alternative Media'''.   Although some consider, for example, [[Rush Limbaugh]]'s launch to be the birth of 'alternative media', so too do the left consider publications like [[The Nation]] to be 'alternative media.'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Albert, Michael. &amp;quot;[http://www.zmag.org/whatmakesalti.htm Alternative Media: What Makes Alternative Media Alternative?]&amp;quot; ''[http://www.zmag.org/ Z]'' Magazine. Retrieved August 2, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In fact, many would view the [[Village Voice]] group to be the most widely published 'alternative media' outlet in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By whatever definition, most media watchers would classify as &amp;quot;alternative media&amp;quot; any media organ that is primarily hosted on the [[Internet]] rather than printed and delivered or mailed to subscribers. The alternative media ''is not'' exclusively conservative. It includes [[liberal]] organs as well. Some writers on these organs have suggested that the mainstream media has a ''conservative'' bias--by which they actually mean that mainstream-media organs are not as revolutionary, or as radical, in their thinking as are the writers themselves.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Peter Dreier|Dreier, Peter]]. &amp;quot;[http://alternet.org/workplace/58108/ For a Brief Moment, The Media Rediscover Poverty].&amp;quot; [http://alternet.org AlterNet.org], July 26, 2007. Retrieved August 2, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Rory O'Connor|O'Connor, Rory]]. &amp;quot;[http://alternet.org/mediaculture/55915/ The Future of Citizen Journalism]. [http://alternet.org AlterNet.org], July 3, 2007. Retrieved August 2, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [[Sheldon Rampton|Rampton, Sheldon]]. &amp;quot;[http://alternet.org/story/54339/ Has the Internet Changed the Propaganda Model?]&amp;quot; [http://alternet.org AlterNet.org], June 22, 2007. Retrieved August 2, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least one MSM organ, [[CBS]] News, attempted in 2006&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pogue, David. &amp;quot;[http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/09/sunday/main1786520.shtml?source=search_story Brave New Blogging World:&lt;br /&gt;
David Pogue Ventures Into The Blogosphere].&amp;quot; [http://www.cbsnews.com/ CBSNews.com], July 9, 2006. Retrieved August 2, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to describe what a particular alternative-media segment (i.e., [[blog]]s) thinks of the MSM:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|They don't believe that you are unbiased, objective, fair a lot of times. And so what they want is they want to read a lot of different sources themselves. because they don't trust the mainstream media..that would be [you].}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is worth noting that liberal blog activity on the internet is declining after the election of [[Barack Hussein Obama]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://bloggasm.com/blog-traffic-for-liberal-blogs-down-58-in-three-months-following-election-conservative-blogs-down-36&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. This shows that the distaste for bias in the liberal MSM is spreading to the alternative media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Advocacy journalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Journalistic malpractice]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Deaths directly attributed to the liberal media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alternative media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mediaresearch.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp Media Bias Basics.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/Media-Bias-Is-Real-Finds-UCLA-6664.aspx Media Bias Is Real-Finds UCLA Political Scientist.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mrc.org/biasalert/archive.aspx Bias Alert.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nowfoundation.org/issues/communications/tv/mediacontrol.html Who Controls the Media?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.freepress.net/ownership/chart/main Ownership Chart: The Big Six.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=626979 Media Lies on Libya Ongoing.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlSlXO_X_fE&amp;amp;feature=related Stephen Lendman talks about Libya and Media.] [[Stephen Lendman]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kentucky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Birth_certificate&amp;diff=965744</id>
		<title>Birth certificate</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Birth_certificate&amp;diff=965744"/>
		<updated>2012-03-03T22:25:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kentucky: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:fixed;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;COWS ARE REDS AND FLOWERS ARE BLUE&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A '''birth certificate''' is an important record that documents when and where a person was born and (usually) who the [[parents]] are.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Collins Essential English Dictionary via [http://www.thefreedictionary.com/birth+certificate The Free Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Obama birth certificate controversy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:fixed;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;COWS ARE REDS AND FLOWERS ARE BLUE&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kentucky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Euro&amp;diff=965743</id>
		<title>Euro</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Euro&amp;diff=965743"/>
		<updated>2012-03-03T22:25:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kentucky: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Euro banknotes.png|right|thumb|Euro banknotes|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:fixed;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;READ THIS PAGE OR JESUS WILL GET ANGRY&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The '''euro''' is the common [[currency]] in the Eurozone (a group of 15 [[European Union]] member states with a population of 320 million), five other states with formal agreements to use it, and four others without formal agreement. Use of the euro began in January 2002, and 12 nations switched their currency immediately to the euro. There was more than €610 billion in circulation in December 2006 (worth US$802 billion at the time), hence the euro has the highest value of cash in circulation in the world, having surpassed the U.S. dollar.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web| last = Atkins| first = Ralph| title = Euro notes cash in to overtake dollar| publisher = Financial Times|date=2006-12-27| url = http://www.ft.com/cms/s/18338034-95ec-11db-9976-0000779e2340.html| accessdate = 2007-05-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Creation==&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1999 the exchange rates of countries that had passed the criteria (and were not exercising an opt-out) were fixed to the euro.  The European Central Bank (ECB) came into being. Euro coins and notes were introduced to the general public on the 1st of January 2002 as legal tender, alongside national currencies. In March 1998, when the calculations in countries that had met the convergence criteria were finalised, eleven countries were admitted to join the European Monetary Union: Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. In June 2000 Greece was admitted. Slovenia joined in 2007, and Malta and Cyprus joined in 2008. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criteria for adoption==&lt;br /&gt;
Countries within the European Union were able to join the Common Currency if they met four criteria (known as the 'convergence criteria'.  These were:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
1. The budget deficit must be below 3% of GDP (the difference between government receipts and expenditures.)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
2. The total government debt must be below 60% of GDP.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
3. The country must have an [[inflation]] rate within 1.5% of the lowest 3 inflation rates of EU countries.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
4. Nominal Long-term interest rates must be within 2% of the interest rate of countries with the lowest 3 inflation rates.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to these criteria a member state's currency must fluctuate within the margins allowed. Countries were allowed to join the common currency if their budget deficit and total government debt were approaching the reference values at a 'satisfactory pace', but not actually on them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Non-participant members==&lt;br /&gt;
In the United Kingdom the currency is still the [[pound]], but there is pressure to convert to the euro that is used throughout Europe. The UK and [[Denmark]] are the only European Union member states with an 'opt-out' (allowing them to select not to join the common currency despite meeting the criteria). In addition to the four criteria of entry set out in the Maastricht Treaty the Chancellor of the Exchequer laid out 5 economic tests the United Kingdom must meet to join; at the last report it had met one, with three others dependant on the final condition which had not been met. Many conservatives in the UK ([[Tories]]) resist conversion to the European currency because a reliance on a common currency represents a loss in sovereignty and control. In particular, there is fear that joining the synchronised EU policy may result in sub-optimal interest rates in difficult periods.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Value==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:626px-Euro coins version II.png|right|thumb|300px|Euro coins]]&lt;br /&gt;
Initially the value of the euro fell on the exchange markets, while many expected it to do the opposite. However it has strengthened in the years since, partly due to the falling value of the dollar. The ECB is charged with maintaining the inflation rate in the Eurozone between 0 and 2%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the end of 2006, after about five years of the euro, a French magazine Le Pèlerin reported that 52% of the French feel that the euro is a &amp;quot;bad thing&amp;quot;, blaming it for price hikes and job losses. 71% of French [[blue-collar workers]] said that euro has hurt them personally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2006/12/28/cneuro28.xml  French hostility to euro begins to gather pace], The Telegraph, 27 December, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of January 2012, the euro is worth approximately [[US]]$1.27 and GB£0.82.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.xe.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Currency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Europe]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kentucky</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=965742</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=965742"/>
		<updated>2012-03-03T22:25:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kentucky: minor changes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:President Barack Obama.jpg|thumbnail|right|180px|President [[Barack Obama]] advocates the use of [[Keynesian economics|Keynesian economic concepts]] despite the fact that John Maynard Keynes was incompetent and a fraud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;position:fixed;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;JESUS ALWAYS READ CONSERVAPEDIA AND SUGGEST YOU TO LIKE IT OR YOU'LL BURN IN THE HELL.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;background-color:#b0c4de;text-decoration:blink;font-size:350%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;SHALL THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER BLESS US ALL&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/fabian-john-maynard-keynes-the-stealthy-enemy-of-human-freedom/ John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-02-22/deathbed-of-keynesian-economics-will-be-in-u-k-matthew-lynn.html Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2008/01/keyness-jew-boy-quickie/220620/ Keynes's &amp;quot;Jew Boy&amp;quot; Quickie, The Atlantic]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Johnwaynegacyrosalynncarter.jpg|right|300px|thumbnail|[[Serial killer]] [[John Wayne Gacy]] was a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with First Lady [[Rosalynn Carter]] in 1978. In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, John Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view&amp;amp;current=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (not to be confused with a ''leftist''), is someone who represents or is in support of some form of liberalism. This often includes social progressivism. Particularly in the [[United States]], the term may also be associated with irreligious people, or those who otherwise disagree with moral or social standards held as traditional by American [[Christian|Christians]]. Some may be [[Christian]], but they are rarely immensely committed to Christianity. Liberalism began as a movement for individual liberties, but today is increasingly [[statist]] and, as in Europe, [[welfare state]]-ist.  Liberalism has changed over the years and degenerated into a delusional (in the sense of economic views) and anti-traditional ideology.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] firmly believed in private sector unions, but vehemently opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties.  Yet today, decades later, [[Democrats]] and liberals are almost in cahoots with public sector unions, as they &amp;quot;donate&amp;quot; money to the reelection campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals currently use two clauses to try and expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause.  The general welfare clause mentions &amp;quot;promoting the general welfare&amp;quot;.  This to a liberal means taxing the rich out of existence and redistributing that money.  The commerce clause on the other hand is in the constitution and says that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign nations, between the states and with the indian tribes.  Since the days of FDR this clause has been interpreted very loosely and has resulted in the federal government vastly expanding its power.  The latest example is Obamacare.  In Obamacare, the liberals justify the individual mandate by saying it regulates commerce between the states.  This is clearly a stretched interpretation of the clause as there is a difference between regulating commerce and forcing citizens to participate in commerce that Congress can regulate.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polling data over several decades has consistently shown that more Americans identify as conservative than as liberal, by a ratio of 2:1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1042/winds-of-political-change-havent--shifted-publics-ideology-balance&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A liberal generally supports many of the following political positions and practices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Spending money on government programs. &lt;br /&gt;
* Government solving economic problems&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The belief that terrorism is not a huge threat, and that the only reason Muslim extremists hate us is because of bad foreign policy &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and/or legalized [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Prohibition of teacher-led [[prayer]] in classrooms and school/state-sponsored religious events&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Affirmative action&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of obscenity, pornography and violence in video games as a [[First Amendment]] right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by [[liberal]] Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography.  These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-funded medical care, such as [[Obamacare]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and government-controlled [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* The denial of traditional [[gender roles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Insisting that men and women be placed in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage]] and homosexual adoption&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tax and spend]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for economic sector regulations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Trying to impede the economic freedom of [[Job Creators]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support and spreading of [[political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of non-syndicalist [[labor union|labor unions]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouraging promiscuity through sexual education (the teaching of safe sex) rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from premarital sex&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it was intended&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the death penalty&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; and environmental organizations, for example [[Greenpeace]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to the integration of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full private property rights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;  For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5-4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstating the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* In 2005, it was reported by CBS News that [[Theory of evolution and liberalism|liberals were the most likely supporters of the theory of evolution]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition of [[Operation Iraqi Freedom]], a major part of the [[War on Terrorism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Withholds support to the [[War on Terrorism]] and the [[War in Iraq]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tolerance of different ideas and lifestyles&lt;br /&gt;
* Supports financially irresponsible policies&lt;br /&gt;
* Following policies which are proven to be incorrect&lt;br /&gt;
* Do not support a laissez-faire capitalist economy and support regulation of business&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouragement of [[Global Warming|global warming alarmism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to current dictionaries and their own beliefs, a liberal is &amp;quot;a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=liberal&amp;amp;sub=Search+WordNet&amp;amp;o2=&amp;amp;o0=1&amp;amp;o7=&amp;amp;o5=&amp;amp;o1=1&amp;amp;o6=&amp;amp;o4=&amp;amp;o3=&amp;amp;h=00&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or &amp;quot;open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:228130875 35181424e3.jpg|thumb|right|175px|[[United States|American]] liberals give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, [[per capita]] [[atheism|atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] in the United States [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''For more information please see'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]] and [[Atheism and charity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March of 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.barna.org/FlexPage.aspx?Page=BarnaUpdate&amp;amp;BarnaUpdateID=152&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians][http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3647/is_200310/ai_n9340592/][http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Story?id=2682730&amp;amp;page=2]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ===&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] exposing the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his lack of charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism and bestiality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Peter-Singer.jpg|right|thumbnail|260px|The [[atheist]] philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of [[bestiality]] (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Atheism and bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. The [[atheist]] philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of bestiality (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the liberal and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]] (Princeton University is a very liberal school - see: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Peter Singer was installed as the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at the University Center for Human Values at Princeton University in 1999 and in 2006 it was reported that he still worked part-time in that capacity. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2006, it was also reported that Singer worked part-time as Laureate Professor at the University of Melbourne in the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics since 2005.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joe Carter's ''[[First Things]]'' article entitled ''The Dangerous Mind'' declares concerning Peter  Singer declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Singer has spent a lifetime justifying the unjustifiable. He is the founding father of the [[Animal rights|animal liberation movement]] and advocates ending “the present speciesist bias against taking seriously the interests of nonhuman animals.” He is also a defender of killing the aged (if they have dementia), newborns (for almost any reason until they are two years old), necrophilia (assuming it’s consensual), and bestiality (also assuming it’s consensual).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 5, 2011, the British newspaper The Telegraph wrote an article which discussed how homosexuality &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; have emboldened individuals to ask for so called bestiality &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; (see: [[Homosexuality and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100108943/the-gay-rights-movement-has-emboldened-americas-bestiality-advocates/ The dark side of sexual freedom: American 'zoophiles' take on the language of equality - October 5, 2011 - The Telegraph]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010, the liberal state of [[Washington]] has the highest number of reported cases of bestiality in the United States even though it was merely the 13th most populous state according to the 2010 United States census. (for more information please see: [[Washington state and bestiality]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pet-abuse.com/pages/cruelty_database/statistics/state_ranking.php?year=2010&amp;amp;search=go Pet Abuse -2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php 2010 United States Census data]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/new-poll-identifies-most-liberal-and-conservative-states/ 2011 Political map - CNN]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2005, four legislators in the liberal state of [[Massachusetts]] tried to soften it bestiality laws.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Massachusetts bill to repeal fornication, adultery, and blasphemy, and to soften bestiality laws]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NBC Tower.jpg|thumbnail|200px|[[LifeSiteNews]] reported:&amp;quot;In 46 hours of programming, [[NBC]] contained only one reference to marital sex, but 11 references to non-marital sex and one reference to [[adultery]] were made. References to incest, pedophilia, partner swapping, prostitution, threesomes, transsexuals/transvestites, [[bestiality]], and necrophilia combined outnumbered references to sex in marriage on NBC by a ratio of 27 to 1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/aug/08080602 Study Finds TV Treats Marital Sex as Burdensome, Adultery as Positive]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Liberalism and bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible says that bestiality is a perversion and, under the [[Old Testament]] [[Pentateuch|Jewish Law]], punishable by death (Exodus 22:19, Leviticus 18:23, Leviticus 20:15 and Deuteronomy 27:21). The atheistic worldview does not lend itself to the establishment of morality within society and individuals (see: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and deception]]).  The atheistic worldview does not lend itself to the establishment of morality within society and individuals (see: [[Atheism and morality]] and [[Atheism and deception]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study found that &amp;quot;Psychiatric patients were found to have a statistically significant higher prevalence rate (55%) of bestiality than the control groups (10% and 15% respectively).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1778686 A prevalence study of bestiality (zoophilia) in psychiatric in-patients, medical in-patients, and psychiatric staff - Int J Psychosom. 1991;38(1-4):45-7.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The atheist population [[Atheism and suicide|has a higher suicide rate]] and [[Atheism and marriageability|lower marriage rates]] than the general population (see: [[Atheism and suicide]] and [[Atheism and marriageability]] and [[Atheism and health]]). In addition,  ''[[Wired (magazine)|Wired]]'' magazine made the observation that atheists tend to be quarrelsome, socially challenged men.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://voxday.blogspot.com/2007/08/socially-autistic-atheist.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information please see:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal American entertainment industry and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia on bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bestiality and Sweden|Liberal Sweden and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bestiality and Britain|Godless Britain and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Denmark, Sweden, evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Netherlands and bestiality|The liberal Netherlands and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Skeptic Skatje Myers' comments on bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin's ape-men experiments]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Occupy Wall Street and bestiality chant]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal.  A crowd at Occupy Wall Street was led to repeat various chants which included a chant involving bestiality and the incident was videotaped.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-10-greatest-moments-from-the-occupy-wall-street-protests-so-far/ The 10 Greatest Moments From The Occupy Wall Street Protests So Far]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is an excerpt of the chant:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Everything seems to be possible. [Crowd Parrot Chant] You can travel to the moon.  [CPC] You can become immortal [CPC] by biogenetics.  You can have sex with animals, or whatever. [CPC].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://rightwingnews.com/john-hawkins/the-10-greatest-moments-from-the-occupy-wall-street-protests-so-far/ The 10 Greatest Moments From The Occupy Wall Street Protests So Far]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and Superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|right|150px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith &amp;amp;mdash; it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberalism in North America Today ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Smear merchants.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly liberal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=Media Research Center}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three liberal tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: SIN. Liberals (1) '''s'''hift the subject, they (2) '''i'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''n'''ame call.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott Baker. [http://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[YouTube]]. [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A&amp;amp; Herman Cain: &amp;quot;Stupid People Are Ruining America&amp;quot;], February 11, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals typically support a &amp;quot;mixed&amp;quot; economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.alde.eu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liberal-international.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal|neoliberals]]. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European [[socialist]] or [[social democracy|social democratic]] parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey [http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf]  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Original meaning: Classical Liberalism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal|Classical Liberalism]]. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Infamous liberals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]] and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://s151.photobucket.com/albums/s151/candypop_02/Serial%20Killers/John%20Wayne%20Gacy/?action=view&amp;amp;current=SERIAL_KILLER_John_Wayne_Gacy_In-1.mp4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gacy was also a [[Democratic Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations == &lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.|ANSWER - Act Now to Stop War and End Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CAIR|CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women|NOW - National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PETA|PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEIU|SEIU - Service Employees International Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scientific Illiteracy and Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Best_New_Conservative_Words#New_Liberal_Terms|New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kentucky</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>