<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Kei</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Kei"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Kei"/>
	<updated>2026-09-30T22:50:54Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Al_Qaeda&amp;diff=193178</id>
		<title>Al Qaeda</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Al_Qaeda&amp;diff=193178"/>
		<updated>2007-06-08T19:26:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: my 3rd insert of the same info; if Conservapedia is to be trusted it must include facts you may not like&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{expand}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:al_qaeda.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Osama bin Laden with Al-Qaeda members]]&lt;br /&gt;
al-Qaeda is an international Islamist [[terrorism|terrorist]] organization founded in the late 1980s to fight the [[Red Army]] of the [[Soviet Union]] in [[Afghanistan]], during the 1980-89 [[Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan]]. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, Osama bin Bin Ladin and his comrades had their own sources of support and training, and they received little or no assistance from the United States,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;9/11 Commission Report[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/sec2.pdf ''The Foundation of the New Terrorism''], pg. 56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which only provided funding to indigenous Afghan ''mujaheddin'', which al-Qaeda was not. It is currently led by [[Osama Bin Laden]] and is predominantly composed of fanatical [[Sunni]] [[Islam|Muslim]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Al Qaeda is responsible for the September 11, 2001 attack on the [[World Trade Center]] and [[The Pentagon|Pentagon]], the bombings of American embassies in [[Kenya]] and [[Tanzania]] in 1998, the October 2000 bombing of the [[USS Cole]], and numerous smaller attacks. The group's wing in Iraq is believed to be responsible for many of the attacks and bombings there. The 9/11 Commission Report has tied al-Qaeda to the government of [[Ba'ath Party|Ba'athist]] government of [[Saddam Hussein]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;9/11 Commission Report, ''The Foundation of the New Terrorism''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; specifically the alleged harboring of al-Qaeda second-in-command [[Abu Musab al-Zarqawi]] and cooperation in Saddam;'s war against the kurds.  the 9/11 Commssion Report cites Bin laden meeting with iraqi intelligence officials in Khatroum as early as 1995. Bin Laden declined reported Iraqi offers of a safe haven, instead settling in Afghanistan. Although friendly contacts between Iraqis and Bin Laden continued, the Report determined that there was no evidence of any operational cooperation between Iraq and Al Qaeda leading up to 9/11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is unclear if Iraq was funding al-Qaeda operations prior to the [[War in Iraq|2003 invasion]]. &amp;quot;Al Qaeda&amp;quot; is roughly equivalent to &amp;quot;the base&amp;quot; ( القاعدة) in [[Arabic]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;However difficult the fight in Iraq has become, we must win it,&amp;quot; Mr. Bush said during a commencement speech at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Conn. &amp;quot;Al Qaeda is public enemy No. 1 for Iraq's young democracy. Al Qaeda is public enemy No. 1 for America as well.&amp;quot; [http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070523-115137-6054r.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/world/2001/war_on_terror/default.stm BBC Profile of Al-Qaeda]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070523-115137-6054r.htm Bush shares al Qaeda plans] - Jon Ward, ''Washington Times'' - May 24, 2007 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terrorists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=192174</id>
		<title>ACLU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=192174"/>
		<updated>2007-06-07T20:58:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: early religion formed life views&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Nghfuyr.png|right|thumb|Current logo of the ACLU.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''ACLU''' is the American Civil Liberties Union, a leftist, secular-progressive organization.  It was run for its first 30 years by an American socialist named Roger Baldwin, who helped found it in 1920. This organization is devoted to protecting certain types of civil liberties of Americans and defending them in court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Free Speech==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU rarely defends Christian speech, and virtually never defends speech that is critical of homosexuality.  The ACLU was silent with respect to the widely publicized censorship of a T-shirt critical of homosexuality that was worn by student Tyler Chase Harper at his public school.  &amp;quot;[It's hard to explain the ACLU's apparent equanimity about the violation of Mr. Harper's First Amendment rights -- unless you consider the content of his speech.  This case does not appear to be anomalous.  Despite its professed commitment to religious liberty, for example, the ACLU tends to absent itself from cases on college campuses involving the associational rights of Christian student groups to discriminate against gay students, in accordance with their religious beliefs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wendy Kaminer, &amp;quot;The American Liberal Liberties Union,&amp;quot; Wall Street Journal (May 23, 2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU Against the Boy Scouts==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a lawsuit to prohibit the federal government from continuing to allow the [[Boy Scouts]], a charitable organization for teenagers, to use an Army base in Virginia for a quadrennial gathering.  In 2005, more than 40,000 Boy Scouts attended this National Boy Scout Jamboree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Boy Scouts have been conducting this Jamboree for 70 years, this lawsuit was not filed until 1999, after the Boy Scouts enforced its policy against having openly homosexual Scout leaders.  The theory of the lawsuit was that because Scouts swear an oath of &amp;quot;duty to God,&amp;quot; it violates the Establishment Clause for the government to allow this joint project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A federal district court ruled for the ACLU, but the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned the lower court ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the suit which will allow the government to continue to sponsor this event for the Boy Scouts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Essay:Boy Scouts Rout ACLU]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
ACLU chapters frequently sue to compel removal of the Ten Commandments from public property.  For example, in ''McCreary County v. ACLU'', 545 U.S. 844 (2005), the ACLU of Kentucky forced two counties to remove displays of the Ten Commandments from their courthouses.  In Utah, the ACLU even announced a scavenger hunt for anyone who could find a display of the Ten Commandments monument that the ACLU could demand be removed.  The ACLU typically receives substantial legal fees from the government in each of these cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1994, the ACLU of New Jersey sued Jersey City, New Jersey to challenge a menorah and a Christmas tree at city hall.  A federal district judge declared the display to be unconstitutional, but the appellate court, in a 2-1 opinion written by now-Justice [[Samuel Alito]], found a modified display to be constitutional.  ''ACLU of New Jersey v. Schundler'' (1999).  Then-Judge Alito wrote, &amp;quot;government may celebrate Christmas in some manner and form, but not in a way that endorses Christian doctrine.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, the ACLU Foundation of Texas filed an [[amicus brief]] for removal of a longstanding monument to William Mosher outside Harris County Civil Courthouse because the statute contained a depiction of an open Bible.  ''Staley v. Harris County'', 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9296 (5th Cir. 2007).  The court ruled that Harris County must pay attorneys fees to the [[Americans United For Separation of Church &amp;amp; State]], which often appears along with the ACLU in demanding removal of religious symbols from government property and censoring criticism of evolution in public school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU demanded that Los Angeles County remove a tiny cross from the Los Angeles County seal, even though the seal contained nearly a dozen symbols including the Greek goddess Pomona standing on the shore of the Pacific Ocean. But ACLU is just fine with the goddess Pomona.  The seal also displayed other California motifs, including the Spanish galleon San Salvador, a tuna fish, a cow, stars representing the movie and television industries, the Hollywood Bowl, oil derricks, and a couple of engineering instruments for Los Angeles’ industrial construction and space exploration.  The cross was a tiny part of the seal.  But Los Angeles County gave into the ACLU's demands and spent $700,000 to censor the cross on the seal and replace it everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally an ACLU chapter does side with a Christian student.  The ACLU of Michigan defended a Christian student seeking to have a Biblical passage on the student's yearbook page.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ACLU and Pornography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Ashcroft v. ACLU]] (2004), the ACLU challenged and invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]], which would have required pornographers to take reasonable steps to restrict access by minors to porn on the Internet.  The Act, which the Supreme Court struck down at the request of the ACLU, did not censor a single word or picture.  It merely required the pornographers to screen their websites from minors, which can be done by credit card or other verification. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious freedom==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 2007 case ''Spratt v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections'', the ACLU bought case against the Rhode Island Adult Correctional Institute following the prison's decision to bar Christian prisoner and lay minister Wesley Spratt from preaching to other inmates during weekly services.  The ACLU won the case on appeal, securing the right for Spratt to hold religious services for other inmates so long as these do not conflict with prison security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Appeals Court Overturns Ban on Christian Preacher in Rhode Island Prison (4/9/2007)[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/29578prs20070409.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, student Abbey Moler selected a bible verse to accompany her picture in a school yearbook. The school subsequently removed this text before publication. The ACLU filed suit against the Utica Community School District, on the grounds that this censorship violated Moler's first-amendment rights to free expression and freedom of religion. The case was settled out of court, with the school district agreeing to replace the verse in following prints of the yearbook and correct it by means of a sticker in copies still in its possession.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU views freedom of religion and the establishment clause as inseparable: In order for people to have religious freedom, their government must neither endorse nor prohibit any religious position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU, Evolution, and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, the ACLU filed [[Selman v. Cobb County School District]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Parents Challenge Evolution Disclaimer In Georgia Textbooks [http://www.aclu.org/religion/schools/16381prs20041112.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If the plaintiffs, five parents in the Georgia district, won the case, the school district would have to pay their lawyers.  The ACLU argued &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU Pretrial Brief in Selman et al v. Cobb County, 11/12/2004 [http://www.aclu.org/FilesPDFs/ACFB940.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that the district had violated the [[Establishment clause]] of the [[U.S. Constitution]] by putting stickers in biology textbooks that said, &amp;quot;This textbook contains material on [[evolution]]. Evolution is a [[theory]], not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The trial judge ruled in favor of the ACLU &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but his ruling was vacated on appeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Appeal Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200510341.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The case was eventually settled.  The school district agreed to remove the stickers, to avoid altering science textbooks or making &amp;quot;any disclaimers regarding evolution&amp;quot;, and to teach the state Board of Education's core curriculum, which includes evolution, although that wasn't under dispute in the original suit.  In addition, they paid $166,669.12 to Atlanta law firm Bondurant, Mixon &amp;amp; Elmore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Agreement Ends Textbook Sticker Case&amp;quot;, press release from Cobb County School District including settlement agreement [http://www.cobb.k12.ga.us/news/2006/20061219_StickerAgreement.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU: Georgia School Board Drops Defense of Anti-Evolution Stickers[http://www.aclu.org/religion/intelligentdesign/27745prs20061219.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of ACLU litigation was ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]].''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District:  &lt;br /&gt;
Decision of the Court, 400 F.Supp.2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover_decision.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, also known as the [[Intelligent design]] case. The ACLU prevailed in prohibiting administrators from reading a short statement that mentions [[Intelligent Design]] to students, and forbade the school board from issuing a warning that Darwin's theory has gaps.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F.Supp.2d 707.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his opinion, Judge [[John E. Jones III]] heavily relied on the later-vacated ruling in ''[[Selman v. Cobb County School District]]'', and on ACLU briefs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;90% of the section on intelligent design was from the ACLU's briefs.  A Comparison of Judge Jones’ Opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover with Plaintiffs’ Proposed “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law”, by David DeWolf &amp;amp; John West, Discovery Institute, December 12, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=3829&amp;amp;program=CSC%20-%20Views%20and%20News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He also cited the [[Establishment test]], the [[Lemon test]], and the [[reasonable student standard]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller,'' 400 F. Supp. 2d at 725 (coming to the conclusion reached in ''Selman'' by the Court's own reasoning), ''compare'' Selman v. Cobb County Sch. Dist, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13005 (11th Cir. May 25, 2006) at *pincite needed*.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The judge also ordered fees paid to the ACLU and its lawyers, totaling $2,067,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' 42 U.S.C. s 1988 (describing relief afforded victorious plaintiff of a 1983 action as including attorney fees).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Same-sex Marriage==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of New Jersey filed an amicus curiae brief in favor of same-sex marriage in ''Lewis v. Harris'', 188 N.J. 415 (1006).  The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of civil unions, but by a 4-3 margin did not require same-sex marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU sues schools when a student alleges encountering &amp;quot;anti-gay peer harassment and bullying based on his perceived sexual orientation.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aclu.org/lgbt/youth/28618prs20070221.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The ACLU holds the school (and hence the taxpayers) liable for actions based on conduct by some students towards others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of Minnesota sued to force the Osseo Area School District to grant equal access to the schools public address (PA) system, yearbook, fundraising and field trips by a pro-homosexual school club named the Straights and Gays for Equality (“SAGE”).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Straights &amp;amp; Gays for Equality v. Osseo Area Schs.'', 471 F.3d 908 (8th Cir. 2006).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The school district already had a club entitled &amp;quot;Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Trans-gender, Questioning and Allies,&amp;quot; and already had a SAGE club, but SAGE was designated as non-curricular and wanted the additional rights of communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU invoked the Equal Access Act to argue that as long as the school district granted these rights to other clubs, such as cheerleading and synchronized swimming, it must grant these rights to SAGE also.  No, the school district argued in defending its action, cheerleading is related to physical education while SAGE is not, and thus SAGE should not have the same rights.  However, there were other non phys-ed sports that got funding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The district court ruled in favor of the ACLU, and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit unanimously affirmed.  The Court ordered the school district to give SAGE the same rights as the cheerleading club.  The ACLU will be able to demand substantial attorneys' fees at taxpayer expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, the ACLU of Florida sued the Okeechobee School Board to force it to allow a Gay-Straight Alliance club at Okeechobee High School.  Though the school objected to this club as a &amp;quot;sex-based&amp;quot; club, the ACLU persuaded a federal judge to rule in its favor, and it will likely recover substantial attorneys fees at taxpayer expense.  See ''Gay-Straight Alliance of Okeechobee High Sch. v. School Board of Okeechobee County'', 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25729 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU is generally against laws that restrict access to abortion, such as parental notification when a minor seeks an abortion and informed consent for the woman herself. ACLU attorneys have argued several cases in support of abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Polygamy==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU has defended [[polygamy|polygamists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;During a question-and-answer session after a speech at Yale University, ACLU president Nadine Strossen stated that her organization has &amp;quot;defended the right of individuals to engage in polygamy,&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44977 World Net Daily] June 25, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/16163prs19990716.html ACLU] press release July 16 1999&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Medical Records==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in favor of the privacy of Rush Limbaugh in his medical records when he was under investigation for 'doctor shopping.' The ACLU argued that the privacy rights of a patient were being violated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108140,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views of the ACLU Founder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Baldwin, a co-founder of the ACLU and its first leader, was born and raised in Massachusetts. He said that his &amp;quot;social work began in my mind in the Unitarian Church when I was ten or twelve years old, and I started to do things that I thought would help other people.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1920 and 1930s he was sympathetic to the social goals and aspirations of the emerging communist nations. In 1934, Balwin published his goals in Soviet Russia Today:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Volokh Conspiracy (blog entry), Eugene Volokh, September 7, 2005 [http://volokh.com/posts/1126138099.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe in non-violent methods of struggle as most effective in the long run for building up successful working class power. Where they cannot be followed or where they are not even permitted by the ruling class, obviously only violent tactics remain. I champion civil liberty as the best of the non-violent means of building the power on which workers rule must be based. If I aid the reactionaries to get free speech now and then, if I go outside the class struggle to fight against censorship, it is only because those liberties help to create a more hospitable atmosphere for working class liberties. The class struggle is the central conflict of the world; all others are incidental.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proletarian Liberty in Practice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When that power of the working class is once achieved, as it has been only in the Soviet Union, I am for maintaining it by any means whatever. Dictatorship is the obvious means in a world of enemies at home and abroad. I dislike it in principle as dangerous to its own objects. But the Soviet Union has already created liberties far greater than exist elsewhere in the world. They are liberties that most closely affect the lives of the people — power in the trade unions, in peasant organizations, in the cultural life of nationalities, freedom of women in public and private life, and a tremendous development of education for adults and children. . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1940 he successfully fought to revise the ACLU charter to prohibit those affiliated with totalitarian organizations from serving on the ACLU board. The immediate target was the former-Wobbly and present Communist Party member, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1947 General Douglas MacArthur arranged for Baldwin to serve as a civil liberties consultant in Japan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/blog/baldwin.pdf Baldwin speaks in defense of communism from 1934]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pro-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclu.org&lt;br /&gt;
*Anti-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.stoptheaclu.com/&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclj.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:liberal activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Al_Qaeda&amp;diff=192172</id>
		<title>Al Qaeda</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Al_Qaeda&amp;diff=192172"/>
		<updated>2007-06-07T20:54:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: corrected factual error&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{expand}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:al_qaeda.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Osama bin Laden with Al-Qaeda members]]&lt;br /&gt;
al-Qaeda is an international Islamist [[terrorism|terrorist]] organization founded in the late 1980s to fight the [[Red Army]] of the [[Soviet Union]] in [[Afghanistan]], during the 1980-89 [[Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan]]. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, Osama bin Bin Ladin and his comrades had their own sources of support and training, and they received little or no assistance from the United States,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;9/11 Commission Report[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/sec2.pdf ''The Foundation of the New Terrorism''], pg. 56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which only provided funding to indigenous Afghan ''mujaheddin'', which al-Qaeda was not. It is currently led by [[Osama Bin Laden]] and is predominantly composed of fanatical [[Sunni]] [[Islam|Muslim]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Al Qaeda is responsible for the September 11, 2001 attack on the [[World Trade Center]] and [[The Pentagon|Pentagon]], the bombings of American embassies in [[Kenya]] and [[Tanzania]] in 1998, the October 2000 bombing of the [[USS Cole]], and numerous smaller attacks. The group's wing in Iraq is believed to be responsible for many of the attacks and bombings there. The 9/11 Commission Report has tied al-Qaeda to the government of [[Ba'ath Party|Ba'athist]] government of [[Saddam Hussein]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;9/11 Commission Report, ''The Foundation of the New Terrorism''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; specifically the alleged harboring of al-Qaeda second-in-command [[Abu Musab al-Zarqawi]] and cooperation in Saddam;'s war against the kurds.  the 9/11 Commssion Report cites Bin laden meeting with iraqi intelligence officials in Khatroum as early as 1995. Bin Laden declined reported Iraqi offers of a safe haven, instead settling in Afghanistan. Friendly contacts between Iraqis and Bin Laden continued, although the Report concludes that there was no operational cooperation between the two.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is unclear if Iraq was funding al-Qaeda operations prior to the [[War in Iraq|2003 invasion]]. &amp;quot;Al Qaeda&amp;quot; is roughly equivalent to &amp;quot;the base&amp;quot; ( القاعدة) in [[Arabic]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;However difficult the fight in Iraq has become, we must win it,&amp;quot; Mr. Bush said during a commencement speech at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Conn. &amp;quot;Al Qaeda is public enemy No. 1 for Iraq's young democracy. Al Qaeda is public enemy No. 1 for America as well.&amp;quot; [http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070523-115137-6054r.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/world/2001/war_on_terror/default.stm BBC Profile of Al-Qaeda]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070523-115137-6054r.htm Bush shares al Qaeda plans] - Jon Ward, ''Washington Times'' - May 24, 2007 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terrorists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Al_Qaeda&amp;diff=192080</id>
		<title>Al Qaeda</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Al_Qaeda&amp;diff=192080"/>
		<updated>2007-06-07T19:37:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: inserted report conclusion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{expand}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:al_qaeda.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Osama bin Laden with Al-Qaeda members]]&lt;br /&gt;
al-Qaeda is an international Islamist [[terrorism|terrorist]] organization founded in the late 1980s to fight the [[Red Army]] of the [[Soviet Union]] in [[Afghanistan]], during the 1980-89 [[Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan]]. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, Osama bin Bin Ladin and his comrades had their own sources of support and training, and they received little or no assistance from the United States,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;9/11 Commission Report[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/sec2.pdf ''The Foundation of the New Terrorism''], pg. 56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which only provided funding to indigenous Afghan ''mujaheddin'', which al-Qaeda was not. It is currently led by [[Osama Bin Laden]] and is predominantly composed of fanatical [[Sunni]] [[Islam|Muslim]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Al Qaeda is responsible for the September 11, 2001 attack on the [[World Trade Center]] and [[The Pentagon|Pentagon]], the bombings of American embassies in [[Kenya]] and [[Tanzania]] in 1998, the October 2000 bombing of the [[USS Cole]], and numerous smaller attacks. The group's wing in Iraq is believed to be responsible for many of the attacks and bombings there. The 9/11 Commission Report has tied al-Qaeda to the government of [[Ba'ath Party|Ba'athist]] government of [[Saddam Hussein]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;9/11 Commission Report, ''The Foundation of the New Terrorism''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; specifically the alleged harboring of al-Qaeda second-in-command [[Abu Musab al-Zarqawi]] and cooperation in Saddam;'s war against the kurds.  the 9/11 Commssion Report cites Bin laden meeting with iraqi intelligence officials in Khatroum as early as 1995. Bin Laden declined reported Iraqi offers of a safe haven, instead settling in Afghanistan. Although there were friendly contacts between Iraqis and Bin Laden, the Report concludes that there is &amp;quot;no evidence&amp;quot; of any collaborative operations, nor was there &amp;quot;evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
It is unclear if Iraq was funding al-Qaeda operations prior to the [[War in Iraq|2003 invasion]]. &amp;quot;Al Qaeda&amp;quot; is roughly equivalent to &amp;quot;the base&amp;quot; ( القاعدة) in [[Arabic]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;However difficult the fight in Iraq has become, we must win it,&amp;quot; Mr. Bush said during a commencement speech at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Conn. &amp;quot;Al Qaeda is public enemy No. 1 for Iraq's young democracy. Al Qaeda is public enemy No. 1 for America as well.&amp;quot; [http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070523-115137-6054r.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/world/2001/war_on_terror/default.stm BBC Profile of Al-Qaeda]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070523-115137-6054r.htm Bush shares al Qaeda plans] - Jon Ward, ''Washington Times'' - May 24, 2007 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terrorists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Proportionality_test&amp;diff=192057</id>
		<title>Proportionality test</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Proportionality_test&amp;diff=192057"/>
		<updated>2007-06-07T19:16:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The proportionality test is a three-part test first adopted under Title IX by the Carter Administration and then expanded by the Clinton Administration, which seeks to apply gender quotas to school sports.  The test consists of counting the number of male and female participants on the school sports teams, and holds that schools are in compliance with Title IX if they:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#have the same proportion of girls in sports as enrolled in the school,&lt;br /&gt;
#are expanding the opportunities for girls in sports, or&lt;br /&gt;
#are satisfying the entire interest of girls to participate in sports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But when a school needs to cut sports teams for budgetary reasons and cannot provide additional sports for girls, then prongs (2) and (3) of the test cannot be satisfied.  In that case the school must meet the quota requirement of (1), thereby causing it to eliminate many more boys teams than girls teams in order to make the proportional representation.  [[James Madison University]] recently did precisely that, cutting far more boys teams than girls teams in order to meet Title IX's requirement for access for both boys and girls. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many seek to apply the proportionality test fully to high schools.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://psg.com/~patf/TitleIX.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''References:'''  &amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Faith_Freedom_International&amp;diff=191076</id>
		<title>Faith Freedom International</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Faith_Freedom_International&amp;diff=191076"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T18:25:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Faith Freedom International''' (often abbreviated as '''FFI''') is an atheistic organization critical of [[Islam]]. The organization was founded by [[Ali Sina]], a [[Muslim]]-turned-[[atheist]], and is geared towards showing Muslims the percieved fallacies within the Qu'ran, and the teachings of the Muslim prophet [[Muhammad]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.faithfreedom.org/index.htm FFI Home Page]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Title_IX&amp;diff=191073</id>
		<title>Title IX</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Title_IX&amp;diff=191073"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T18:24:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Title IX''' is a section of the [[Civil Rights Act]] which mandates that no one &amp;quot;be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance&amp;quot; on account of sex.  [[20 U.S.C. § 1681(a)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Title IX is controversial not for what it says, but how it is applied.  Under informal regulations adopted by the Democratic Administrations of Presidents [[Jimmy Carter]] and [[Bill Clinton]], a [[gender]] [[proportionality test]] may be applied to schools that receive any federal money concerning.  This test causes these institutions to attempt to have the same proportion of boys and girls on sports teams as are enrolled in the school, regardless of interest in sports.  Some seek to apply this proportionality test to [[math]] and [[science]] programs also.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, it has resulted in a significant increase in women's sports programs nationwide.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States law]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sports]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abolitionism&amp;diff=191059</id>
		<title>Abolitionism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abolitionism&amp;diff=191059"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T18:08:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Abolitionism''' was a movement that sought to end the institution of [[slavery]].  It originated with the [[Enlightenment]] in [[Europe]] and eventually spread to other areas, including the northern [[United States]]. Some of its adherents murdered white slave owners and openly encouraged violent slave rebellions in the South. This led to tense situations preceding the American [[Civil War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The origination of this movement in Enlightment Europe must be questioned, given that the British abolition of the slave trade was preceded by the Haitian Revolution, which brought an end to racial slavery in that former French colony.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some modern day anti-abortion activists claim lineage from the abolitionist movement, in that they also fight for persons denied legal rights by unjust laws.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notable abolitionists included [[William Wilberforce]] and [[John Brown]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Astroturfing&amp;diff=191055</id>
		<title>Astroturfing</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Astroturfing&amp;diff=191055"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T18:05:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: /* Union of Concerned Scientists */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Astroturfing''' means pretending to represent a constituency. The term refers to [[grassroots]] movements, where &amp;quot;astroturf&amp;quot; in the artificial grass used in the Houston Astrodome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American Corn Growers Association==&lt;br /&gt;
This group opposes genetically-engineered crops for ideological reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
*ACGA has much stronger ties to and support from the environmental extremists than they do from actual corn producers in the U.S. They are not credible representatives for U.S. corn growers. [http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/42]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Union of Concerned Scientists]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) is a nonprofit alliance of some fifty thousand scientists and citizens across the United States. The group's stated goal is to combine rigorous scientific analysis with committed citizen advocacy in order to build a cleaner environment and a safer world. The group focuses on issues such as global warming and the environmental impact of vehicles and various energy sources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Claims there is a &amp;quot;[[scientific consensus]]&amp;quot; in favor of the [[Anthropogenic global warming theory]] and trashed the reputation of Danish statisticion [[Bjorn Lomborg]] when he exposed [[environmentalist]] [[junk science]]. &lt;br /&gt;
*UCS embraces an environmental agenda that often stands at odds with the “rigorous scientific analysis” it claims to employ. A radical green wolf in sheep’s clothing, UCS tries to distinguish itself from the [[Greenpeace]]s of the world by convincing the media that its recommendations reflect a consensus among the scientific community. [http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/145]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=191048</id>
		<title>ACLU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=191048"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T17:49:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: /* Religious freedom */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Nghfuyr.png|right|thumb|Current logo of the ACLU.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''ACLU''' is the American Civil Liberties Union, which was run for its first 30 years by an American socialist named Roger Baldwin, who helped found it in 1920. This organization is devoted to protecting civil liberties of Americans and defending them in court. While it is most famous for cases that prohibit the use of government to promote religion, it also has a history of defending others' rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Free Speech==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU has a history of defending free speech, even of those who se speech many woud regard as repugnant. Teh most famous example is it's defense of American Nazi's rights to parade through a predpominantlkt Jewish sectionof Skokie, Illinois, in 1977.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU virtually never defends speech that is critical of homosexuality.{{fact}}  The ACLU was silent with respect to the widely publicized censorship of a T-shirt critical of homosexuality that was worn by student Tyler Chase Harper at his public school.  &amp;quot;[I]t's hard to explain the ACLU's apparent equanimity about the violation of Mr. Harper's First Amendment rights -- unless you consider the content of his speech.  This case does not appear to be anomalous.  Despite its professed commitment to religious liberty, for example, the ACLU tends to absent itself from cases on college campuses involving the associational rights of Christian student groups to discriminate against gay students, in accordance with their religious beliefs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wendy Kaminer, &amp;quot;The American Liberal Liberties Union,&amp;quot; Wall Street Journal (May 23, 2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU Against the Boy Scouts==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a lawsuit to prohibit the federal government from continuing to allow the [[Boy Scouts]], a charitable organization for teenagers, to use an Army base in Virginia for a quadrennial gathering.  In 2005, more than 40,000 Boy Scouts attended this National Boy Scout Jamboree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Boy Scouts have been conducting this Jamboree for 70 years, this lawsuit was not filed until 1999, after the Boy Scouts enforced its policy against having openly homosexual Scout leaders.  The theory of the lawsuit was that because Scouts swear an oath of &amp;quot;duty to God,&amp;quot; it violates the Establishment Clause for the government to allow this joint project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A federal district court ruled for the ACLU, but the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned the lower court ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the suit which will allow the government to continue to sponsor this event for the Boy Scouts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Essay:Boy Scouts Rout ACLU]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
ACLU chapters frequently sue to compel removal of the Ten Commandments from public property.  For example, in ''McCreary County v. ACLU'', 545 U.S. 844 (2005), the ACLU of Kentucky forced two counties to remove displays of the Ten Commandments from their courthouses.  In Utah, the ACLU even announced a scavenger hunt for anyone who could find a display of the Ten Commandments monument that the ACLU could demand be removed.  The ACLU typically receives substantial legal fees from the government in each of these cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1994, the ACLU of New Jersey sued Jersey City, New Jersey to challenge a menorah and a Christmas tree at city hall.  A federal district judge declared the display to be unconstitutional, but the appellate court, in a 2-1 opinion written by now-Justice [[Samuel Alito]], found a modified display to be constitutional.  ''ACLU of New Jersey v. Schundler'' (1999).  Then-Judge Alito wrote, &amp;quot;government may celebrate Christmas in some manner and form, but not in a way that endorses Christian doctrine.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, the ACLU Foundation of Texas filed an [[amicus brief]] for removal of a longstanding monument to William Mosher outside Harris County Civil Courthouse because the statute contained a depiction of an open Bible.  ''Staley v. Harris County'', 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9296 (5th Cir. 2007).  The court ruled that Harris County must pay attorneys fees to the [[Americans United For Separation of Church &amp;amp; State]], which often appears along with the ACLU in demanding removal of religious symbols from government property and censoring criticism of evolution in public school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU demanded that Los Angeles County remove a tiny cross from the Los Angeles County seal, even though the seal contained nearly a dozen symbols including the Greek goddess Pomona standing on the shore of the Pacific Ocean. But ACLU is just fine with the goddess Pomona.  The seal also displayed other California motifs, including the Spanish galleon San Salvador, a tuna fish, a cow, stars representing the movie and television industries, the Hollywood Bowl, oil derricks, and a couple of engineering instruments for Los Angeles’ industrial construction and space exploration.  The cross was a tiny part of the seal.  But Los Angeles County gave into the ACLU's demands and spent $700,000 to censor the cross on the seal and replace it everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally an ACLU chapter does side with a Christian student.  The ACLU of Michigan defended a Christian student seeking to have a Biblical passage on the student's yearbook page.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ACLU and Pornography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Ashcroft v. ACLU]] (2004), the ACLU challenged and invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]], which would have required pornographers to take reasonable steps to restrict access by minors to porn on the internet.  The Act, which the Supreme Court struck down at the request of the ACLU, did not censor a single word or picture.  It merely required the pornographers to screen their websites from minors, which can be done by credit card or other verification. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious freedom==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 2007 case ''Spratt v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections'', the ACLU bought case against the Rhode Island Adult Correctional Institute following the prison's decision to bar Christian prisoner and lay minister Wesley Spratt from preaching to other inmates during weekly services.  The ACLU won the case on appeal, securing the right for Spratt to hold religious services for other inmates so long as these do not conflict with prison security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Appeals Court Overturns Ban on Christian Preacher in Rhode Island Prison (4/9/2007)[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/29578prs20070409.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002 a federal judge struck down a provision of the Virginia Constitution that banned religious organizations from incorporating. In this case the ACLU joined with the Rev. Jerry Falwell.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, student Abbey Moler selected a bible verse to accompany her picture in a school yearbook. The school subsequently removed this text before publication. The ACLU filed suit against the Utica Community School District, on the grounds that this censorship violated Moler's first-amendment rights to free expression and freedom of religion. The case was settled out of court, with the school district agreeing to replace the verse in following prints of the yearbook and correct it by means of a sticker in copies still in its posession.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2005 the ACLU of New Jersey filed a friend-of-the-court brief agreeing that a second grader had the right to sing &amp;quot;Awesome God&amp;quot; at a talent show, protecting the religious expression rights of students. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU views freedom of religion and the establishment clause as inseparable: In order for people to have religious freedom, their government must neither endorse nor prohibit any religious position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU, Evolution, and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, the ACLU filed [[Selman v. Cobb County School District]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Parents Challenge Evolution Disclaimer In Georgia Textbooks [http://www.aclu.org/religion/schools/16381prs20041112.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If the plaintiffs, five parents in the Georgia district, won the case, the school district would have to pay their lawyers.  The ACLU argued &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU Pretrial Brief in Selman et al v. Cobb County, 11/12/2004 [http://www.aclu.org/FilesPDFs/ACFB940.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that the district had violated the [[Establishment clause]] of the [[U.S. Constitution]] by putting stickers in biology textbooks that said, &amp;quot;This textbook contains material on [[evolution]]. Evolution is a [[theory]], not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The trial judge ruled in favor of the ACLU &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but his ruling was vacated on appeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Appeal Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200510341.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The case was eventually settled.  The school district agreed to remove the stickers, to avoid altering science textbooks or making &amp;quot;any disclaimers regarding evolution&amp;quot;, and to teach the state Board of Education's core curriculum, which includes evolution, although that wasn't under dispute in the original suit.  In addition, they paid $166,669.12 to Atlanta law firm Bondurant, Mixon &amp;amp; Elmore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Agreement Ends Textbook Sticker Case&amp;quot;, press release from Cobb County School District including settlement agreement [http://www.cobb.k12.ga.us/news/2006/20061219_StickerAgreement.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU: Georgia School Board Drops Defense of Anti-Evolution Stickers[http://www.aclu.org/religion/intelligentdesign/27745prs20061219.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of ACLU litigation was ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]].''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District:  &lt;br /&gt;
Decision of the Court, 400 F.Supp.2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover_decision.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, also known as the [[Intelligent design]] case. The ACLU prevailed in prohibiting administrators from reading a short statement that mentions [[Intelligent Design]] to students, and forbade the school board from issuing a warning that Darwin's theory has gaps.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F.Supp.2d 707.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his opinion, Judge [[John E. Jones III]] heavily relied on the later-vacated ruling in ''[[Selman v. Cobb County School District]]'', and on ACLU briefs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;90% of the section on intelligent design was from the ACLU's briefs.  A Comparison of Judge Jones’ Opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover with Plaintiffs’ Proposed “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law”, by David DeWolf &amp;amp; John West, Discovery Institute, December 12, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=3829&amp;amp;program=CSC%20-%20Views%20and%20News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He also cited the [[Establishment test]], the [[Lemon test]], and the [[reasonable student standard]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller,'' 400 F. Supp. 2d at 725 (coming to the conclusion reached in ''Selman'' by the Court's own reasoning), ''compare'' Selman v. Cobb County Sch. Dist, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13005 (11th Cir. May 25, 2006) at *pincite needed*.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The judge also ordered fees paid to the ACLU and its lawyers, totaling $2,067,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' 42 U.S.C. s 1988 (describing relief afforded victorious plaintiff of a 1983 action as including attorney fees).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Same-sex Marriage==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of New Jersey filed an amicus curiae brief in favor of same-sex marriage in ''Lewis v. Harris'', 188 N.J. 415 (1006).  The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of civil unions, but by a 4-3 margin did not require same-sex marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU sues schools when a student alleges encountering &amp;quot;anti-gay peer harassment and bullying based on his perceived sexual orientation.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aclu.org/lgbt/youth/28618prs20070221.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The ACLU holds the school (and hence the taxpayers) liable for actions based on conduct by some students towards others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of Minnesota sued to force the Osseo Area School District to grant equal access to the schools public address (PA) system, yearbook, fundraising and field trips by a pro-homosexual school club named the Straights and Gays for Equality (“SAGE”).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Straights &amp;amp; Gays for Equality v. Osseo Area Schs.'', 471 F.3d 908 (8th Cir. 2006).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The school district already had a club entitled &amp;quot;Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transgender, Questioning and Allies,&amp;quot; and already had a SAGE club, but SAGE was designated as non-curricular and wanted the additional rights of communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU invoked the Equal Access Act to argue that as long as the school district granted these rights to other clubs, such as cheerleading and synchronized swimming, it must grant these rights to SAGE also.  No, the school district argued in defending its action, cheerleading is related to physical education while SAGE is not, and thus SAGE should not have the same rights.  However, there were other non phys-ed sports that got funding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The district court ruled in favor of the ACLU, and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit unanimously affirmed.  The Court ordered the school district to give SAGE the same rights as the cheerleading club.  The ACLU will be able to demand substantial attorneys' fees at taxpayer expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, the ACLU of Florida sued the Okeechobee School Board to force it to allow a Gay-Straight Alliance club at Okeechobee High School.  Though the school objected to this club as a &amp;quot;sex-based&amp;quot; club, the ACLU persuaded a federal judge to rule in its favor, and it will likely recover substantial attorneys fees at taxpayer expense.  See ''Gay-Straight Alliance of Okeechobee High Sch. v. School Board of Okeechobee County'', 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25729 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU is generally against laws that restrict access to abortion, such as parental notification when a minor seeks an abortion and informed consent for the woman herself. ACLU attorneys have argued several cases in support of abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Polygamy==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU has defended [[polygamy|polygamists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;During a question-and-answer session after a speech at Yale University, ACLU president Nadine Strossen stated that her organization has &amp;quot;defended the right of individuals to engage in polygamy,&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44977 World Net Daily] June 25, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/16163prs19990716.html ACLU] press release July 16 1999&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Medical Records==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in favor of the privacy of Rush Limbaugh in his medical records when he was under investigation for 'doctor shopping.' The ACLU argued that the privacy rights of a patient were being violated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108140,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views of the ACLU Founder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Baldwin, a co-founder of the ACLU and its first leader, was born and raised in Massachusetts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1920 and 1930s he was sympathetic to the social goals and aspirations of the emerging communist nations. In 1934, Balwin published his goals in Soviet Russia Today:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Volokh Conspiracy (blog entry), Eugene Volokh, September 7, 2005 [http://volokh.com/posts/1126138099.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe in non-violent methods of struggle as most effective in the long run for building up successful working class power. Where they cannot be followed or where they are not even permitted by the ruling class, obviously only violent tactics remain. I champion civil liberty as the best of the non-violent means of building the power on which workers rule must be based. If I aid the reactionaries to get free speech now and then, if I go outside the class struggle to fight against censorship, it is only because those liberties help to create a more hospitable atmosphere for working class liberties. The class struggle is the central conflict of the world; all others are incidental.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proletarian Liberty in Practice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When that power of the working class is once achieved, as it has been only in the Soviet Union, I am for maintaining it by any means whatever. Dictatorship is the obvious means in a world of enemies at home and abroad. I dislike it in principle as dangerous to its own objects. But the Soviet Union has already created liberties far greater than exist elsewhere in the world. They are liberties that most closely affect the lives of the people — power in the trade unions, in peasant organizations, in the cultural life of nationalities, freedom of women in public and private life, and a tremendous development of education for adults and children. . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1940 he successfully fought to revise the ACLU charter to prohibit those affiliated with totalitarian organizations from serving on the ACLU board. The immediate target was the former-Wobbly and present Communist Party member, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1947 General Douglas MacArthur arranged for Baldwin to serve as a civil liberties consultant in Japan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/blog/baldwin.pdf Baldwin speaks in defense of communism from 1934]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pro-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclu.org&lt;br /&gt;
*Anti-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.stoptheaclu.com/&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclj.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:liberal activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=191044</id>
		<title>ACLU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=191044"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T17:47:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: /* ACLU and Free Speech */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Nghfuyr.png|right|thumb|Current logo of the ACLU.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''ACLU''' is the American Civil Liberties Union, which was run for its first 30 years by an American socialist named Roger Baldwin, who helped found it in 1920. This organization is devoted to protecting civil liberties of Americans and defending them in court. While it is most famous for cases that prohibit the use of government to promote religion, it also has a history of defending others' rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Free Speech==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU has a history of defending free speech, even of those who se speech many woud regard as repugnant. Teh most famous example is it's defense of American Nazi's rights to parade through a predpominantlkt Jewish sectionof Skokie, Illinois, in 1977.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU virtually never defends speech that is critical of homosexuality.{{fact}}  The ACLU was silent with respect to the widely publicized censorship of a T-shirt critical of homosexuality that was worn by student Tyler Chase Harper at his public school.  &amp;quot;[I]t's hard to explain the ACLU's apparent equanimity about the violation of Mr. Harper's First Amendment rights -- unless you consider the content of his speech.  This case does not appear to be anomalous.  Despite its professed commitment to religious liberty, for example, the ACLU tends to absent itself from cases on college campuses involving the associational rights of Christian student groups to discriminate against gay students, in accordance with their religious beliefs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wendy Kaminer, &amp;quot;The American Liberal Liberties Union,&amp;quot; Wall Street Journal (May 23, 2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU Against the Boy Scouts==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a lawsuit to prohibit the federal government from continuing to allow the [[Boy Scouts]], a charitable organization for teenagers, to use an Army base in Virginia for a quadrennial gathering.  In 2005, more than 40,000 Boy Scouts attended this National Boy Scout Jamboree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Boy Scouts have been conducting this Jamboree for 70 years, this lawsuit was not filed until 1999, after the Boy Scouts enforced its policy against having openly homosexual Scout leaders.  The theory of the lawsuit was that because Scouts swear an oath of &amp;quot;duty to God,&amp;quot; it violates the Establishment Clause for the government to allow this joint project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A federal district court ruled for the ACLU, but the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned the lower court ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the suit which will allow the government to continue to sponsor this event for the Boy Scouts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Essay:Boy Scouts Rout ACLU]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
ACLU chapters frequently sue to compel removal of the Ten Commandments from public property.  For example, in ''McCreary County v. ACLU'', 545 U.S. 844 (2005), the ACLU of Kentucky forced two counties to remove displays of the Ten Commandments from their courthouses.  In Utah, the ACLU even announced a scavenger hunt for anyone who could find a display of the Ten Commandments monument that the ACLU could demand be removed.  The ACLU typically receives substantial legal fees from the government in each of these cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1994, the ACLU of New Jersey sued Jersey City, New Jersey to challenge a menorah and a Christmas tree at city hall.  A federal district judge declared the display to be unconstitutional, but the appellate court, in a 2-1 opinion written by now-Justice [[Samuel Alito]], found a modified display to be constitutional.  ''ACLU of New Jersey v. Schundler'' (1999).  Then-Judge Alito wrote, &amp;quot;government may celebrate Christmas in some manner and form, but not in a way that endorses Christian doctrine.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, the ACLU Foundation of Texas filed an [[amicus brief]] for removal of a longstanding monument to William Mosher outside Harris County Civil Courthouse because the statute contained a depiction of an open Bible.  ''Staley v. Harris County'', 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9296 (5th Cir. 2007).  The court ruled that Harris County must pay attorneys fees to the [[Americans United For Separation of Church &amp;amp; State]], which often appears along with the ACLU in demanding removal of religious symbols from government property and censoring criticism of evolution in public school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU demanded that Los Angeles County remove a tiny cross from the Los Angeles County seal, even though the seal contained nearly a dozen symbols including the Greek goddess Pomona standing on the shore of the Pacific Ocean. But ACLU is just fine with the goddess Pomona.  The seal also displayed other California motifs, including the Spanish galleon San Salvador, a tuna fish, a cow, stars representing the movie and television industries, the Hollywood Bowl, oil derricks, and a couple of engineering instruments for Los Angeles’ industrial construction and space exploration.  The cross was a tiny part of the seal.  But Los Angeles County gave into the ACLU's demands and spent $700,000 to censor the cross on the seal and replace it everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally an ACLU chapter does side with a Christian student.  The ACLU of Michigan defended a Christian student seeking to have a Biblical passage on the student's yearbook page.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ACLU and Pornography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Ashcroft v. ACLU]] (2004), the ACLU challenged and invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]], which would have required pornographers to take reasonable steps to restrict access by minors to porn on the internet.  The Act, which the Supreme Court struck down at the request of the ACLU, did not censor a single word or picture.  It merely required the pornographers to screen their websites from minors, which can be done by credit card or other verification. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious freedom==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 2007 case ''Spratt v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections'', the ACLU bought case against the Rhode Island Adult Correctional Institute following the prison's decision to bar Christian prisoner and lay minister Wesley Spratt from preaching to other inmates during weekly services.  The ACLU won the case on appeal, securing the right for Spratt to hold religious services for other inmates so long as these do not conflict with prison security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Appeals Court Overturns Ban on Christian Preacher in Rhode Island Prison (4/9/2007)[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/29578prs20070409.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, student Abbey Moler selected a bible verse to accompany her picture in a school yearbook. The school subsequently removed this text before publication. The ACLU filed suit against the Utica Community School District, on the grounds that this censorship violated Moler's first-amendment rights to free expression and freedom of religion. The case was settled out of court, with the school district agreeing to replace the verse in following prints of the yearbook and correct it by means of a sticker in copies still in its posession.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2005 the ACLU of New Jersey filed a friend-of-the-court brief agreeing that a second grader had the right to sing &amp;quot;Awesome God&amp;quot; at a talent show, protecting the religious expression rights of students. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU views freedom of religion and the establishment clause as inseparable: In order for people to have religious freedom, their government must neither endorse nor prohibit any religious position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU, Evolution, and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, the ACLU filed [[Selman v. Cobb County School District]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Parents Challenge Evolution Disclaimer In Georgia Textbooks [http://www.aclu.org/religion/schools/16381prs20041112.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If the plaintiffs, five parents in the Georgia district, won the case, the school district would have to pay their lawyers.  The ACLU argued &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU Pretrial Brief in Selman et al v. Cobb County, 11/12/2004 [http://www.aclu.org/FilesPDFs/ACFB940.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that the district had violated the [[Establishment clause]] of the [[U.S. Constitution]] by putting stickers in biology textbooks that said, &amp;quot;This textbook contains material on [[evolution]]. Evolution is a [[theory]], not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The trial judge ruled in favor of the ACLU &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but his ruling was vacated on appeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Appeal Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200510341.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The case was eventually settled.  The school district agreed to remove the stickers, to avoid altering science textbooks or making &amp;quot;any disclaimers regarding evolution&amp;quot;, and to teach the state Board of Education's core curriculum, which includes evolution, although that wasn't under dispute in the original suit.  In addition, they paid $166,669.12 to Atlanta law firm Bondurant, Mixon &amp;amp; Elmore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Agreement Ends Textbook Sticker Case&amp;quot;, press release from Cobb County School District including settlement agreement [http://www.cobb.k12.ga.us/news/2006/20061219_StickerAgreement.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU: Georgia School Board Drops Defense of Anti-Evolution Stickers[http://www.aclu.org/religion/intelligentdesign/27745prs20061219.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of ACLU litigation was ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]].''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District:  &lt;br /&gt;
Decision of the Court, 400 F.Supp.2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover_decision.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, also known as the [[Intelligent design]] case. The ACLU prevailed in prohibiting administrators from reading a short statement that mentions [[Intelligent Design]] to students, and forbade the school board from issuing a warning that Darwin's theory has gaps.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F.Supp.2d 707.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his opinion, Judge [[John E. Jones III]] heavily relied on the later-vacated ruling in ''[[Selman v. Cobb County School District]]'', and on ACLU briefs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;90% of the section on intelligent design was from the ACLU's briefs.  A Comparison of Judge Jones’ Opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover with Plaintiffs’ Proposed “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law”, by David DeWolf &amp;amp; John West, Discovery Institute, December 12, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=3829&amp;amp;program=CSC%20-%20Views%20and%20News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He also cited the [[Establishment test]], the [[Lemon test]], and the [[reasonable student standard]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller,'' 400 F. Supp. 2d at 725 (coming to the conclusion reached in ''Selman'' by the Court's own reasoning), ''compare'' Selman v. Cobb County Sch. Dist, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13005 (11th Cir. May 25, 2006) at *pincite needed*.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The judge also ordered fees paid to the ACLU and its lawyers, totaling $2,067,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' 42 U.S.C. s 1988 (describing relief afforded victorious plaintiff of a 1983 action as including attorney fees).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Same-sex Marriage==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of New Jersey filed an amicus curiae brief in favor of same-sex marriage in ''Lewis v. Harris'', 188 N.J. 415 (1006).  The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of civil unions, but by a 4-3 margin did not require same-sex marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU sues schools when a student alleges encountering &amp;quot;anti-gay peer harassment and bullying based on his perceived sexual orientation.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aclu.org/lgbt/youth/28618prs20070221.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The ACLU holds the school (and hence the taxpayers) liable for actions based on conduct by some students towards others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of Minnesota sued to force the Osseo Area School District to grant equal access to the schools public address (PA) system, yearbook, fundraising and field trips by a pro-homosexual school club named the Straights and Gays for Equality (“SAGE”).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Straights &amp;amp; Gays for Equality v. Osseo Area Schs.'', 471 F.3d 908 (8th Cir. 2006).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The school district already had a club entitled &amp;quot;Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transgender, Questioning and Allies,&amp;quot; and already had a SAGE club, but SAGE was designated as non-curricular and wanted the additional rights of communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU invoked the Equal Access Act to argue that as long as the school district granted these rights to other clubs, such as cheerleading and synchronized swimming, it must grant these rights to SAGE also.  No, the school district argued in defending its action, cheerleading is related to physical education while SAGE is not, and thus SAGE should not have the same rights.  However, there were other non phys-ed sports that got funding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The district court ruled in favor of the ACLU, and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit unanimously affirmed.  The Court ordered the school district to give SAGE the same rights as the cheerleading club.  The ACLU will be able to demand substantial attorneys' fees at taxpayer expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, the ACLU of Florida sued the Okeechobee School Board to force it to allow a Gay-Straight Alliance club at Okeechobee High School.  Though the school objected to this club as a &amp;quot;sex-based&amp;quot; club, the ACLU persuaded a federal judge to rule in its favor, and it will likely recover substantial attorneys fees at taxpayer expense.  See ''Gay-Straight Alliance of Okeechobee High Sch. v. School Board of Okeechobee County'', 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25729 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU is generally against laws that restrict access to abortion, such as parental notification when a minor seeks an abortion and informed consent for the woman herself. ACLU attorneys have argued several cases in support of abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Polygamy==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU has defended [[polygamy|polygamists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;During a question-and-answer session after a speech at Yale University, ACLU president Nadine Strossen stated that her organization has &amp;quot;defended the right of individuals to engage in polygamy,&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44977 World Net Daily] June 25, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/16163prs19990716.html ACLU] press release July 16 1999&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Medical Records==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in favor of the privacy of Rush Limbaugh in his medical records when he was under investigation for 'doctor shopping.' The ACLU argued that the privacy rights of a patient were being violated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108140,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views of the ACLU Founder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Baldwin, a co-founder of the ACLU and its first leader, was born and raised in Massachusetts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1920 and 1930s he was sympathetic to the social goals and aspirations of the emerging communist nations. In 1934, Balwin published his goals in Soviet Russia Today:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Volokh Conspiracy (blog entry), Eugene Volokh, September 7, 2005 [http://volokh.com/posts/1126138099.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe in non-violent methods of struggle as most effective in the long run for building up successful working class power. Where they cannot be followed or where they are not even permitted by the ruling class, obviously only violent tactics remain. I champion civil liberty as the best of the non-violent means of building the power on which workers rule must be based. If I aid the reactionaries to get free speech now and then, if I go outside the class struggle to fight against censorship, it is only because those liberties help to create a more hospitable atmosphere for working class liberties. The class struggle is the central conflict of the world; all others are incidental.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proletarian Liberty in Practice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When that power of the working class is once achieved, as it has been only in the Soviet Union, I am for maintaining it by any means whatever. Dictatorship is the obvious means in a world of enemies at home and abroad. I dislike it in principle as dangerous to its own objects. But the Soviet Union has already created liberties far greater than exist elsewhere in the world. They are liberties that most closely affect the lives of the people — power in the trade unions, in peasant organizations, in the cultural life of nationalities, freedom of women in public and private life, and a tremendous development of education for adults and children. . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1940 he successfully fought to revise the ACLU charter to prohibit those affiliated with totalitarian organizations from serving on the ACLU board. The immediate target was the former-Wobbly and present Communist Party member, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1947 General Douglas MacArthur arranged for Baldwin to serve as a civil liberties consultant in Japan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/blog/baldwin.pdf Baldwin speaks in defense of communism from 1934]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pro-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclu.org&lt;br /&gt;
*Anti-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.stoptheaclu.com/&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclj.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:liberal activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=191043</id>
		<title>ACLU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=191043"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T17:45:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Nghfuyr.png|right|thumb|Current logo of the ACLU.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''ACLU''' is the American Civil Liberties Union, which was run for its first 30 years by an American socialist named Roger Baldwin, who helped found it in 1920. This organization is devoted to protecting civil liberties of Americans and defending them in court. While it is most famous for cases that prohibit the use of government to promote religion, it also has a history of defending others' rights. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Free Speech==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU virtually never defends speech that is critical of homosexuality.{{fact}}  The ACLU was silent with respect to the widely publicized censorship of a T-shirt critical of homosexuality that was worn by student Tyler Chase Harper at his public school.  &amp;quot;[I]t's hard to explain the ACLU's apparent equanimity about the violation of Mr. Harper's First Amendment rights -- unless you consider the content of his speech.  This case does not appear to be anomalous.  Despite its professed commitment to religious liberty, for example, the ACLU tends to absent itself from cases on college campuses involving the associational rights of Christian student groups to discriminate against gay students, in accordance with their religious beliefs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wendy Kaminer, &amp;quot;The American Liberal Liberties Union,&amp;quot; Wall Street Journal (May 23, 2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU Against the Boy Scouts==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a lawsuit to prohibit the federal government from continuing to allow the [[Boy Scouts]], a charitable organization for teenagers, to use an Army base in Virginia for a quadrennial gathering.  In 2005, more than 40,000 Boy Scouts attended this National Boy Scout Jamboree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Boy Scouts have been conducting this Jamboree for 70 years, this lawsuit was not filed until 1999, after the Boy Scouts enforced its policy against having openly homosexual Scout leaders.  The theory of the lawsuit was that because Scouts swear an oath of &amp;quot;duty to God,&amp;quot; it violates the Establishment Clause for the government to allow this joint project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A federal district court ruled for the ACLU, but the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned the lower court ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the suit which will allow the government to continue to sponsor this event for the Boy Scouts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Essay:Boy Scouts Rout ACLU]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
ACLU chapters frequently sue to compel removal of the Ten Commandments from public property.  For example, in ''McCreary County v. ACLU'', 545 U.S. 844 (2005), the ACLU of Kentucky forced two counties to remove displays of the Ten Commandments from their courthouses.  In Utah, the ACLU even announced a scavenger hunt for anyone who could find a display of the Ten Commandments monument that the ACLU could demand be removed.  The ACLU typically receives substantial legal fees from the government in each of these cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1994, the ACLU of New Jersey sued Jersey City, New Jersey to challenge a menorah and a Christmas tree at city hall.  A federal district judge declared the display to be unconstitutional, but the appellate court, in a 2-1 opinion written by now-Justice [[Samuel Alito]], found a modified display to be constitutional.  ''ACLU of New Jersey v. Schundler'' (1999).  Then-Judge Alito wrote, &amp;quot;government may celebrate Christmas in some manner and form, but not in a way that endorses Christian doctrine.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, the ACLU Foundation of Texas filed an [[amicus brief]] for removal of a longstanding monument to William Mosher outside Harris County Civil Courthouse because the statute contained a depiction of an open Bible.  ''Staley v. Harris County'', 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9296 (5th Cir. 2007).  The court ruled that Harris County must pay attorneys fees to the [[Americans United For Separation of Church &amp;amp; State]], which often appears along with the ACLU in demanding removal of religious symbols from government property and censoring criticism of evolution in public school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU demanded that Los Angeles County remove a tiny cross from the Los Angeles County seal, even though the seal contained nearly a dozen symbols including the Greek goddess Pomona standing on the shore of the Pacific Ocean. But ACLU is just fine with the goddess Pomona.  The seal also displayed other California motifs, including the Spanish galleon San Salvador, a tuna fish, a cow, stars representing the movie and television industries, the Hollywood Bowl, oil derricks, and a couple of engineering instruments for Los Angeles’ industrial construction and space exploration.  The cross was a tiny part of the seal.  But Los Angeles County gave into the ACLU's demands and spent $700,000 to censor the cross on the seal and replace it everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally an ACLU chapter does side with a Christian student.  The ACLU of Michigan defended a Christian student seeking to have a Biblical passage on the student's yearbook page.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ACLU and Pornography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Ashcroft v. ACLU]] (2004), the ACLU challenged and invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]], which would have required pornographers to take reasonable steps to restrict access by minors to porn on the internet.  The Act, which the Supreme Court struck down at the request of the ACLU, did not censor a single word or picture.  It merely required the pornographers to screen their websites from minors, which can be done by credit card or other verification. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious freedom==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 2007 case ''Spratt v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections'', the ACLU bought case against the Rhode Island Adult Correctional Institute following the prison's decision to bar Christian prisoner and lay minister Wesley Spratt from preaching to other inmates during weekly services.  The ACLU won the case on appeal, securing the right for Spratt to hold religious services for other inmates so long as these do not conflict with prison security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Appeals Court Overturns Ban on Christian Preacher in Rhode Island Prison (4/9/2007)[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/29578prs20070409.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, student Abbey Moler selected a bible verse to accompany her picture in a school yearbook. The school subsequently removed this text before publication. The ACLU filed suit against the Utica Community School District, on the grounds that this censorship violated Moler's first-amendment rights to free expression and freedom of religion. The case was settled out of court, with the school district agreeing to replace the verse in following prints of the yearbook and correct it by means of a sticker in copies still in its posession.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2005 the ACLU of New Jersey filed a friend-of-the-court brief agreeing that a second grader had the right to sing &amp;quot;Awesome God&amp;quot; at a talent show, protecting the religious expression rights of students. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU views freedom of religion and the establishment clause as inseparable: In order for people to have religious freedom, their government must neither endorse nor prohibit any religious position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU, Evolution, and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, the ACLU filed [[Selman v. Cobb County School District]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Parents Challenge Evolution Disclaimer In Georgia Textbooks [http://www.aclu.org/religion/schools/16381prs20041112.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If the plaintiffs, five parents in the Georgia district, won the case, the school district would have to pay their lawyers.  The ACLU argued &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU Pretrial Brief in Selman et al v. Cobb County, 11/12/2004 [http://www.aclu.org/FilesPDFs/ACFB940.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that the district had violated the [[Establishment clause]] of the [[U.S. Constitution]] by putting stickers in biology textbooks that said, &amp;quot;This textbook contains material on [[evolution]]. Evolution is a [[theory]], not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The trial judge ruled in favor of the ACLU &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but his ruling was vacated on appeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Appeal Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200510341.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The case was eventually settled.  The school district agreed to remove the stickers, to avoid altering science textbooks or making &amp;quot;any disclaimers regarding evolution&amp;quot;, and to teach the state Board of Education's core curriculum, which includes evolution, although that wasn't under dispute in the original suit.  In addition, they paid $166,669.12 to Atlanta law firm Bondurant, Mixon &amp;amp; Elmore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Agreement Ends Textbook Sticker Case&amp;quot;, press release from Cobb County School District including settlement agreement [http://www.cobb.k12.ga.us/news/2006/20061219_StickerAgreement.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU: Georgia School Board Drops Defense of Anti-Evolution Stickers[http://www.aclu.org/religion/intelligentdesign/27745prs20061219.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of ACLU litigation was ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]].''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District:  &lt;br /&gt;
Decision of the Court, 400 F.Supp.2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover_decision.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, also known as the [[Intelligent design]] case. The ACLU prevailed in prohibiting administrators from reading a short statement that mentions [[Intelligent Design]] to students, and forbade the school board from issuing a warning that Darwin's theory has gaps.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F.Supp.2d 707.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his opinion, Judge [[John E. Jones III]] heavily relied on the later-vacated ruling in ''[[Selman v. Cobb County School District]]'', and on ACLU briefs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;90% of the section on intelligent design was from the ACLU's briefs.  A Comparison of Judge Jones’ Opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover with Plaintiffs’ Proposed “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law”, by David DeWolf &amp;amp; John West, Discovery Institute, December 12, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=3829&amp;amp;program=CSC%20-%20Views%20and%20News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He also cited the [[Establishment test]], the [[Lemon test]], and the [[reasonable student standard]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller,'' 400 F. Supp. 2d at 725 (coming to the conclusion reached in ''Selman'' by the Court's own reasoning), ''compare'' Selman v. Cobb County Sch. Dist, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13005 (11th Cir. May 25, 2006) at *pincite needed*.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The judge also ordered fees paid to the ACLU and its lawyers, totaling $2,067,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' 42 U.S.C. s 1988 (describing relief afforded victorious plaintiff of a 1983 action as including attorney fees).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Same-sex Marriage==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of New Jersey filed an amicus curiae brief in favor of same-sex marriage in ''Lewis v. Harris'', 188 N.J. 415 (1006).  The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of civil unions, but by a 4-3 margin did not require same-sex marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU sues schools when a student alleges encountering &amp;quot;anti-gay peer harassment and bullying based on his perceived sexual orientation.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aclu.org/lgbt/youth/28618prs20070221.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The ACLU holds the school (and hence the taxpayers) liable for actions based on conduct by some students towards others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of Minnesota sued to force the Osseo Area School District to grant equal access to the schools public address (PA) system, yearbook, fundraising and field trips by a pro-homosexual school club named the Straights and Gays for Equality (“SAGE”).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Straights &amp;amp; Gays for Equality v. Osseo Area Schs.'', 471 F.3d 908 (8th Cir. 2006).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The school district already had a club entitled &amp;quot;Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transgender, Questioning and Allies,&amp;quot; and already had a SAGE club, but SAGE was designated as non-curricular and wanted the additional rights of communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU invoked the Equal Access Act to argue that as long as the school district granted these rights to other clubs, such as cheerleading and synchronized swimming, it must grant these rights to SAGE also.  No, the school district argued in defending its action, cheerleading is related to physical education while SAGE is not, and thus SAGE should not have the same rights.  However, there were other non phys-ed sports that got funding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The district court ruled in favor of the ACLU, and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit unanimously affirmed.  The Court ordered the school district to give SAGE the same rights as the cheerleading club.  The ACLU will be able to demand substantial attorneys' fees at taxpayer expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, the ACLU of Florida sued the Okeechobee School Board to force it to allow a Gay-Straight Alliance club at Okeechobee High School.  Though the school objected to this club as a &amp;quot;sex-based&amp;quot; club, the ACLU persuaded a federal judge to rule in its favor, and it will likely recover substantial attorneys fees at taxpayer expense.  See ''Gay-Straight Alliance of Okeechobee High Sch. v. School Board of Okeechobee County'', 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25729 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU is generally against laws that restrict access to abortion, such as parental notification when a minor seeks an abortion and informed consent for the woman herself. ACLU attorneys have argued several cases in support of abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Polygamy==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU has defended [[polygamy|polygamists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;During a question-and-answer session after a speech at Yale University, ACLU president Nadine Strossen stated that her organization has &amp;quot;defended the right of individuals to engage in polygamy,&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44977 World Net Daily] June 25, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/16163prs19990716.html ACLU] press release July 16 1999&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Medical Records==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in favor of the privacy of Rush Limbaugh in his medical records when he was under investigation for 'doctor shopping.' The ACLU argued that the privacy rights of a patient were being violated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108140,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views of the ACLU Founder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Baldwin, a co-founder of the ACLU and its first leader, was born and raised in Massachusetts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1920 and 1930s he was sympathetic to the social goals and aspirations of the emerging communist nations. In 1934, Balwin published his goals in Soviet Russia Today:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Volokh Conspiracy (blog entry), Eugene Volokh, September 7, 2005 [http://volokh.com/posts/1126138099.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe in non-violent methods of struggle as most effective in the long run for building up successful working class power. Where they cannot be followed or where they are not even permitted by the ruling class, obviously only violent tactics remain. I champion civil liberty as the best of the non-violent means of building the power on which workers rule must be based. If I aid the reactionaries to get free speech now and then, if I go outside the class struggle to fight against censorship, it is only because those liberties help to create a more hospitable atmosphere for working class liberties. The class struggle is the central conflict of the world; all others are incidental.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proletarian Liberty in Practice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When that power of the working class is once achieved, as it has been only in the Soviet Union, I am for maintaining it by any means whatever. Dictatorship is the obvious means in a world of enemies at home and abroad. I dislike it in principle as dangerous to its own objects. But the Soviet Union has already created liberties far greater than exist elsewhere in the world. They are liberties that most closely affect the lives of the people — power in the trade unions, in peasant organizations, in the cultural life of nationalities, freedom of women in public and private life, and a tremendous development of education for adults and children. . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1940 he successfully fought to revise the ACLU charter to prohibit those affiliated with totalitarian organizations from serving on the ACLU board. The immediate target was the former-Wobbly and present Communist Party member, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1947 General Douglas MacArthur arranged for Baldwin to serve as a civil liberties consultant in Japan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/blog/baldwin.pdf Baldwin speaks in defense of communism from 1934]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pro-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclu.org&lt;br /&gt;
*Anti-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.stoptheaclu.com/&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclj.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:liberal activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=191042</id>
		<title>ACLU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=191042"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T17:42:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: /* Religious freedom */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Nghfuyr.png|right|thumb|Current logo of the ACLU.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''ACLU''' is the American Civil Liberties Union, which was run for its first 30 years by an American socialist named Roger Baldwin, who helped found it in 1920. This organization is devoted to protecting certain types of civil liberties of Americans and defending them in court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Free Speech==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU virtually never defends speech that is critical of homosexuality.{{fact}}  The ACLU was silent with respect to the widely publicized censorship of a T-shirt critical of homosexuality that was worn by student Tyler Chase Harper at his public school.  &amp;quot;[I]t's hard to explain the ACLU's apparent equanimity about the violation of Mr. Harper's First Amendment rights -- unless you consider the content of his speech.  This case does not appear to be anomalous.  Despite its professed commitment to religious liberty, for example, the ACLU tends to absent itself from cases on college campuses involving the associational rights of Christian student groups to discriminate against gay students, in accordance with their religious beliefs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wendy Kaminer, &amp;quot;The American Liberal Liberties Union,&amp;quot; Wall Street Journal (May 23, 2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU Against the Boy Scouts==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a lawsuit to prohibit the federal government from continuing to allow the [[Boy Scouts]], a charitable organization for teenagers, to use an Army base in Virginia for a quadrennial gathering.  In 2005, more than 40,000 Boy Scouts attended this National Boy Scout Jamboree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Boy Scouts have been conducting this Jamboree for 70 years, this lawsuit was not filed until 1999, after the Boy Scouts enforced its policy against having openly homosexual Scout leaders.  The theory of the lawsuit was that because Scouts swear an oath of &amp;quot;duty to God,&amp;quot; it violates the Establishment Clause for the government to allow this joint project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A federal district court ruled for the ACLU, but the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned the lower court ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the suit which will allow the government to continue to sponsor this event for the Boy Scouts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Essay:Boy Scouts Rout ACLU]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
ACLU chapters frequently sue to compel removal of the Ten Commandments from public property.  For example, in ''McCreary County v. ACLU'', 545 U.S. 844 (2005), the ACLU of Kentucky forced two counties to remove displays of the Ten Commandments from their courthouses.  In Utah, the ACLU even announced a scavenger hunt for anyone who could find a display of the Ten Commandments monument that the ACLU could demand be removed.  The ACLU typically receives substantial legal fees from the government in each of these cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1994, the ACLU of New Jersey sued Jersey City, New Jersey to challenge a menorah and a Christmas tree at city hall.  A federal district judge declared the display to be unconstitutional, but the appellate court, in a 2-1 opinion written by now-Justice [[Samuel Alito]], found a modified display to be constitutional.  ''ACLU of New Jersey v. Schundler'' (1999).  Then-Judge Alito wrote, &amp;quot;government may celebrate Christmas in some manner and form, but not in a way that endorses Christian doctrine.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, the ACLU Foundation of Texas filed an [[amicus brief]] for removal of a longstanding monument to William Mosher outside Harris County Civil Courthouse because the statute contained a depiction of an open Bible.  ''Staley v. Harris County'', 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9296 (5th Cir. 2007).  The court ruled that Harris County must pay attorneys fees to the [[Americans United For Separation of Church &amp;amp; State]], which often appears along with the ACLU in demanding removal of religious symbols from government property and censoring criticism of evolution in public school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU demanded that Los Angeles County remove a tiny cross from the Los Angeles County seal, even though the seal contained nearly a dozen symbols including the Greek goddess Pomona standing on the shore of the Pacific Ocean. But ACLU is just fine with the goddess Pomona.  The seal also displayed other California motifs, including the Spanish galleon San Salvador, a tuna fish, a cow, stars representing the movie and television industries, the Hollywood Bowl, oil derricks, and a couple of engineering instruments for Los Angeles’ industrial construction and space exploration.  The cross was a tiny part of the seal.  But Los Angeles County gave into the ACLU's demands and spent $700,000 to censor the cross on the seal and replace it everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally an ACLU chapter does side with a Christian student.  The ACLU of Michigan defended a Christian student seeking to have a Biblical passage on the student's yearbook page.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ACLU and Pornography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Ashcroft v. ACLU]] (2004), the ACLU challenged and invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]], which would have required pornographers to take reasonable steps to restrict access by minors to porn on the internet.  The Act, which the Supreme Court struck down at the request of the ACLU, did not censor a single word or picture.  It merely required the pornographers to screen their websites from minors, which can be done by credit card or other verification. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious freedom==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 2007 case ''Spratt v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections'', the ACLU bought case against the Rhode Island Adult Correctional Institute following the prison's decision to bar Christian prisoner and lay minister Wesley Spratt from preaching to other inmates during weekly services.  The ACLU won the case on appeal, securing the right for Spratt to hold religious services for other inmates so long as these do not conflict with prison security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Appeals Court Overturns Ban on Christian Preacher in Rhode Island Prison (4/9/2007)[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/29578prs20070409.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, student Abbey Moler selected a bible verse to accompany her picture in a school yearbook. The school subsequently removed this text before publication. The ACLU filed suit against the Utica Community School District, on the grounds that this censorship violated Moler's first-amendment rights to free expression and freedom of religion. The case was settled out of court, with the school district agreeing to replace the verse in following prints of the yearbook and correct it by means of a sticker in copies still in its posession.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2005 the ACLU of New Jersey filed a friend-of-the-court brief agreeing that a second grader had the right to sing &amp;quot;Awesome God&amp;quot; at a talent show, protecting the religious expression rights of students. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU views freedom of religion and the establishment clause as inseparable: In order for people to have religious freedom, their government must neither endorse nor prohibit any religious position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU, Evolution, and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, the ACLU filed [[Selman v. Cobb County School District]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Parents Challenge Evolution Disclaimer In Georgia Textbooks [http://www.aclu.org/religion/schools/16381prs20041112.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If the plaintiffs, five parents in the Georgia district, won the case, the school district would have to pay their lawyers.  The ACLU argued &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU Pretrial Brief in Selman et al v. Cobb County, 11/12/2004 [http://www.aclu.org/FilesPDFs/ACFB940.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that the district had violated the [[Establishment clause]] of the [[U.S. Constitution]] by putting stickers in biology textbooks that said, &amp;quot;This textbook contains material on [[evolution]]. Evolution is a [[theory]], not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The trial judge ruled in favor of the ACLU &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but his ruling was vacated on appeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Appeal Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200510341.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The case was eventually settled.  The school district agreed to remove the stickers, to avoid altering science textbooks or making &amp;quot;any disclaimers regarding evolution&amp;quot;, and to teach the state Board of Education's core curriculum, which includes evolution, although that wasn't under dispute in the original suit.  In addition, they paid $166,669.12 to Atlanta law firm Bondurant, Mixon &amp;amp; Elmore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Agreement Ends Textbook Sticker Case&amp;quot;, press release from Cobb County School District including settlement agreement [http://www.cobb.k12.ga.us/news/2006/20061219_StickerAgreement.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU: Georgia School Board Drops Defense of Anti-Evolution Stickers[http://www.aclu.org/religion/intelligentdesign/27745prs20061219.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of ACLU litigation was ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]].''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District:  &lt;br /&gt;
Decision of the Court, 400 F.Supp.2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover_decision.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, also known as the [[Intelligent design]] case. The ACLU prevailed in prohibiting administrators from reading a short statement that mentions [[Intelligent Design]] to students, and forbade the school board from issuing a warning that Darwin's theory has gaps.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F.Supp.2d 707.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his opinion, Judge [[John E. Jones III]] heavily relied on the later-vacated ruling in ''[[Selman v. Cobb County School District]]'', and on ACLU briefs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;90% of the section on intelligent design was from the ACLU's briefs.  A Comparison of Judge Jones’ Opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover with Plaintiffs’ Proposed “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law”, by David DeWolf &amp;amp; John West, Discovery Institute, December 12, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=3829&amp;amp;program=CSC%20-%20Views%20and%20News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He also cited the [[Establishment test]], the [[Lemon test]], and the [[reasonable student standard]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller,'' 400 F. Supp. 2d at 725 (coming to the conclusion reached in ''Selman'' by the Court's own reasoning), ''compare'' Selman v. Cobb County Sch. Dist, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13005 (11th Cir. May 25, 2006) at *pincite needed*.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The judge also ordered fees paid to the ACLU and its lawyers, totaling $2,067,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' 42 U.S.C. s 1988 (describing relief afforded victorious plaintiff of a 1983 action as including attorney fees).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Same-sex Marriage==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of New Jersey filed an amicus curiae brief in favor of same-sex marriage in ''Lewis v. Harris'', 188 N.J. 415 (1006).  The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of civil unions, but by a 4-3 margin did not require same-sex marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU sues schools when a student alleges encountering &amp;quot;anti-gay peer harassment and bullying based on his perceived sexual orientation.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aclu.org/lgbt/youth/28618prs20070221.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The ACLU holds the school (and hence the taxpayers) liable for actions based on conduct by some students towards others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of Minnesota sued to force the Osseo Area School District to grant equal access to the schools public address (PA) system, yearbook, fundraising and field trips by a pro-homosexual school club named the Straights and Gays for Equality (“SAGE”).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Straights &amp;amp; Gays for Equality v. Osseo Area Schs.'', 471 F.3d 908 (8th Cir. 2006).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The school district already had a club entitled &amp;quot;Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transgender, Questioning and Allies,&amp;quot; and already had a SAGE club, but SAGE was designated as non-curricular and wanted the additional rights of communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU invoked the Equal Access Act to argue that as long as the school district granted these rights to other clubs, such as cheerleading and synchronized swimming, it must grant these rights to SAGE also.  No, the school district argued in defending its action, cheerleading is related to physical education while SAGE is not, and thus SAGE should not have the same rights.  However, there were other non phys-ed sports that got funding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The district court ruled in favor of the ACLU, and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit unanimously affirmed.  The Court ordered the school district to give SAGE the same rights as the cheerleading club.  The ACLU will be able to demand substantial attorneys' fees at taxpayer expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, the ACLU of Florida sued the Okeechobee School Board to force it to allow a Gay-Straight Alliance club at Okeechobee High School.  Though the school objected to this club as a &amp;quot;sex-based&amp;quot; club, the ACLU persuaded a federal judge to rule in its favor, and it will likely recover substantial attorneys fees at taxpayer expense.  See ''Gay-Straight Alliance of Okeechobee High Sch. v. School Board of Okeechobee County'', 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25729 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU is generally against laws that restrict access to abortion, such as parental notification when a minor seeks an abortion and informed consent for the woman herself. ACLU attorneys have argued several cases in support of abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Polygamy==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU has defended [[polygamy|polygamists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;During a question-and-answer session after a speech at Yale University, ACLU president Nadine Strossen stated that her organization has &amp;quot;defended the right of individuals to engage in polygamy,&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44977 World Net Daily] June 25, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/16163prs19990716.html ACLU] press release July 16 1999&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Medical Records==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in favor of the privacy of Rush Limbaugh in his medical records when he was under investigation for 'doctor shopping.' The ACLU argued that the privacy rights of a patient were being violated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108140,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views of the ACLU Founder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Baldwin, a co-founder of the ACLU and its first leader, was born and raised in Massachusetts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1920 and 1930s he was sympathetic to the social goals and aspirations of the emerging communist nations. In 1934, Balwin published his goals in Soviet Russia Today:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Volokh Conspiracy (blog entry), Eugene Volokh, September 7, 2005 [http://volokh.com/posts/1126138099.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe in non-violent methods of struggle as most effective in the long run for building up successful working class power. Where they cannot be followed or where they are not even permitted by the ruling class, obviously only violent tactics remain. I champion civil liberty as the best of the non-violent means of building the power on which workers rule must be based. If I aid the reactionaries to get free speech now and then, if I go outside the class struggle to fight against censorship, it is only because those liberties help to create a more hospitable atmosphere for working class liberties. The class struggle is the central conflict of the world; all others are incidental.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proletarian Liberty in Practice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When that power of the working class is once achieved, as it has been only in the Soviet Union, I am for maintaining it by any means whatever. Dictatorship is the obvious means in a world of enemies at home and abroad. I dislike it in principle as dangerous to its own objects. But the Soviet Union has already created liberties far greater than exist elsewhere in the world. They are liberties that most closely affect the lives of the people — power in the trade unions, in peasant organizations, in the cultural life of nationalities, freedom of women in public and private life, and a tremendous development of education for adults and children. . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1940 he successfully fought to revise the ACLU charter to prohibit those affiliated with totalitarian organizations from serving on the ACLU board. The immediate target was the former-Wobbly and present Communist Party member, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1947 General Douglas MacArthur arranged for Baldwin to serve as a civil liberties consultant in Japan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/blog/baldwin.pdf Baldwin speaks in defense of communism from 1934]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pro-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclu.org&lt;br /&gt;
*Anti-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.stoptheaclu.com/&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclj.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:liberal activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Leftist&amp;diff=190933</id>
		<title>Leftist</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Leftist&amp;diff=190933"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T16:05:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{merge|political spectrum}}&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''Leftist''' refers to someone on the 'left' side of the [[political spectrum]] who generally supports varying degrees of social, political, or economic change designed to promote the public welfare, variously in the guises of social democracy, liberalism, or the several strains of socialism and communism. It may also be applied to those who oppose conservative politics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word 'liberal' is often used in the US to mean 'leftist'.  But this is inconsistent with the original meaning of the word [[liberal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Reign of Terror]] in France in the late 1790s radical leftists attempted a dechristianization movement to replace the &amp;quot;reactionary&amp;quot; worship of God and replace it with the worship of national patriotism, or the ''Patrie''.  Many French churches were closed and converted into Temples of Reason. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Hall Stewart, ''A Documentary Survey of the French Revolution'' (Macmillan, New York, 1963). &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Michael Bakunin critiqued prominent leftist theoritician [[Karl Marx]] in 1873 with these words, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;..if the [[proletariat]] is to be the ruling class, over whom is it to rule? ...the peasant &amp;quot;rabble&amp;quot; who, as it is known, does not enjoy the sympathy of the Marxists who consider it to represent a [[Racism|lower level of culture]], will probably be ruled by the factory proletariat of the cities. Or, if this problem is to be approached [[Nationalism|nationalist]]ically, the [[Slavs]] will be placed in the same subordinate relationship to the victorious German proletariat in which the latter now stands to the German bourgeoisie.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Bakunin, ''Statism and Anarchy'', (1873), in Sam Dolgoff, ''Bakunin'' On Anarchy, (Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1972), p. 330.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Modern leftists==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Modern leftists in the United States have come under increasing criticism as advocates of thought control. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.humanevents.com//article.php?id=20562 Leftist Thought Control], David Limbaugh, ''Human Events'', 05/04/2007. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author David Limbaugh cites, &amp;quot;Consider the subjects of [[evolution]], [[global warming]], [[gay agenda|special rights for homosexuals]] and [[abstinence]] education. Consider efforts of the left to silence conservative talk radio. Consider the mainstream media's arrogant denial of its transparent [[liberal bias]], pronouncing itself to be above politics and inherently objective and its critics somehow skewed....Consider the leftist refrain that [[red state]] conservatives do not merely possess a different world view, but are not part of the &amp;quot;reality-based community.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.marx2mao.com/Lenin/LWC20.html V. I. Lenin, ''&amp;quot;Left-Wing&amp;quot; Communism, An Infantile Disorder''] (1920) V. I. Lenin, Selected Works, English edition, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1952, Vol. II, Part 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Franklin_Pierce&amp;diff=190930</id>
		<title>Franklin Pierce</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Franklin_Pierce&amp;diff=190930"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T16:03:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: corrected death year&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;250&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin-left:5px&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|[[Image:Franklin pierce.jpg|180px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: green no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Franklin Pierce;&lt;br /&gt;
Fourteenth President of the United States &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Born&lt;br /&gt;
|November 23, 1804&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Died&lt;br /&gt;
|October 8, 1869&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Term&lt;br /&gt;
|1853-1857&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Franklin Pierce''' was the 14th [[president]] of the [[United States]]. He served as the president from 1853-1857.  Pierce was a [[democrat]] and a northerner known to have southern sympathies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to being elected, Pierce served in both the House and Senate and achieved the rank of [[brigadier general]] in the [[Mexican-American War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pierce died on October 8, 1869 in Concord, New Hampshire from cirrhosis of the liver.&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Pierce, Franklin}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Presidents of the United States]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=190927</id>
		<title>ACLU</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=ACLU&amp;diff=190927"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T16:01:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: added facts about baldwin's life&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Nghfuyr.png|right|thumb|Current logo of the ACLU.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''ACLU''' is the American Civil Liberties Union, which was run for its first 30 years by an American socialist named Roger Baldwin, who helped found it in 1920. This organization is devoted to protecting certain types of civil liberties of Americans and defending them in court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Free Speech==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU rarely defends Christian speech, and virtually never defends speech that is critical of homosexuality.  The ACLU was silent with respect to the widely publicized censorship of a T-shirt critical of homosexuality that was worn by student Tyler Chase Harper at his public school.  &amp;quot;[I]t's hard to explain the ACLU's apparent equanimity about the violation of Mr. Harper's First Amendment rights -- unless you consider the content of his speech.  This case does not appear to be anomalous.  Despite its professed commitment to religious liberty, for example, the ACLU tends to absent itself from cases on college campuses involving the associational rights of Christian student groups to discriminate against gay students, in accordance with their religious beliefs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wendy Kaminer, &amp;quot;The American Liberal Liberties Union,&amp;quot; Wall Street Journal (May 23, 2007).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU Against the Boy Scouts==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a lawsuit to prohibit the federal government from continuing to allow the [[Boy Scouts]], a charitable organization for teenagers, to use an Army base in Virginia for a quadrennial gathering.  In 2005, more than 40,000 Boy Scouts attended this National Boy Scout Jamboree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Boy Scouts have been conducting this Jamboree for 70 years, this lawsuit was not filed until 1999, after the Boy Scouts enforced its policy against having openly homosexual Scout leaders.  The theory of the lawsuit was that because Scouts swear an oath of &amp;quot;duty to God,&amp;quot; it violates the Establishment Clause for the government to allow this joint project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A federal district court ruled for the ACLU, but the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned the lower court ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the suit which will allow the government to continue to sponsor this event for the Boy Scouts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Essay:Boy Scouts Rout ACLU]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
ACLU chapters frequently sue to compel removal of the Ten Commandments from public property.  For example, in ''McCreary County v. ACLU'', 545 U.S. 844 (2005), the ACLU of Kentucky forced two counties to remove displays of the Ten Commandments from their courthouses.  In Utah, the ACLU even announced a scavenger hunt for anyone who could find a display of the Ten Commandments monument that the ACLU could demand be removed.  The ACLU typically receives substantial legal fees from the government in each of these cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1994, the ACLU of New Jersey sued Jersey City, New Jersey to challenge a menorah and a Christmas tree at city hall.  A federal district judge declared the display to be unconstitutional, but the appellate court, in a 2-1 opinion written by now-Justice [[Samuel Alito]], found a modified display to be constitutional.  ''ACLU of New Jersey v. Schundler'' (1999).  Then-Judge Alito wrote, &amp;quot;government may celebrate Christmas in some manner and form, but not in a way that endorses Christian doctrine.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, the ACLU Foundation of Texas filed an [[amicus brief]] for removal of a longstanding monument to William Mosher outside Harris County Civil Courthouse because the statute contained a depiction of an open Bible.  ''Staley v. Harris County'', 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 9296 (5th Cir. 2007).  The court ruled that Harris County must pay attorneys fees to the [[Americans United For Separation of Church &amp;amp; State]], which often appears along with the ACLU in demanding removal of religious symbols from government property and censoring criticism of evolution in public school.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU demanded that Los Angeles County remove a tiny cross from the Los Angeles County seal, even though the seal contained nearly a dozen symbols including the Greek goddess Pomona standing on the shore of the Pacific Ocean. But ACLU is just fine with the goddess Pomona.  The seal also displayed other California motifs, including the Spanish galleon San Salvador, a tuna fish, a cow, stars representing the movie and television industries, the Hollywood Bowl, oil derricks, and a couple of engineering instruments for Los Angeles’ industrial construction and space exploration.  The cross was a tiny part of the seal.  But Los Angeles County gave into the ACLU's demands and spent $700,000 to censor the cross on the seal and replace it everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Occasionally an ACLU chapter does side with a Christian student.  The ACLU of Michigan defended a Christian student seeking to have a Biblical passage on the student's yearbook page.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== ACLU and Pornography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Ashcroft v. ACLU]] (2004), the ACLU challenged and invalidated the [[Child Online Protection Act]], which would have required pornographers to take reasonable steps to restrict access by minors to porn on the internet.  The Act, which the Supreme Court struck down at the request of the ACLU, did not censor a single word or picture.  It merely required the pornographers to screen their websites from minors, which can be done by credit card or other verification. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious freedom==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 2007 case ''Spratt v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections'', the ACLU bought case against the Rhode Island Adult Correctional Institute following the prison's decision to bar Christian prisoner and lay minister Wesley Spratt from preaching to other inmates during weekly services.  The ACLU won the case on appeal, securing the right for Spratt to hold religious services for other inmates so long as these do not conflict with prison security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Appeals Court Overturns Ban on Christian Preacher in Rhode Island Prison (4/9/2007)[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/29578prs20070409.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, student Abbey Moler selected a bible verse to accompany her picture in a school yearbook. The school subsequently removed this text before publication. The ACLU filed suit against the Utica Community School District, on the grounds that this censorship violated Moler's first-amendment rights to free expression and freedom of religion. The case was settled out of court, with the school district agreeing to replace the verse in following prints of the yearbook and correct it by means of a sticker in copies still in its posession.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  After ACLU Intervention on Behalf of Christian Valedictorian, Michigan High School Agrees to Stop Censoring Religious Yearbook Entries (5/11/2004)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.aclu.org/studentsrights/expression/12845prs20040511.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU views freedom of religion and the establishment clause as inseparable: In order for people to have religious freedom, their government must neither endorse nor prohibit any religious position.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU, Evolution, and the Establishment Clause==&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, the ACLU filed [[Selman v. Cobb County School District]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU:  Parents Challenge Evolution Disclaimer In Georgia Textbooks [http://www.aclu.org/religion/schools/16381prs20041112.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  If the plaintiffs, five parents in the Georgia district, won the case, the school district would have to pay their lawyers.  The ACLU argued &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU Pretrial Brief in Selman et al v. Cobb County, 11/12/2004 [http://www.aclu.org/FilesPDFs/ACFB940.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that the district had violated the [[Establishment clause]] of the [[U.S. Constitution]] by putting stickers in biology textbooks that said, &amp;quot;This textbook contains material on [[evolution]]. Evolution is a [[theory]], not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The trial judge ruled in favor of the ACLU &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Judge's Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/religion/selmancobb11305ord.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, but his ruling was vacated on appeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Appeal Decision, Selman v. Cobb County School District[http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200510341.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The case was eventually settled.  The school district agreed to remove the stickers, to avoid altering science textbooks or making &amp;quot;any disclaimers regarding evolution&amp;quot;, and to teach the state Board of Education's core curriculum, which includes evolution, although that wasn't under dispute in the original suit.  In addition, they paid $166,669.12 to Atlanta law firm Bondurant, Mixon &amp;amp; Elmore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Agreement Ends Textbook Sticker Case&amp;quot;, press release from Cobb County School District including settlement agreement [http://www.cobb.k12.ga.us/news/2006/20061219_StickerAgreement.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;ACLU: Georgia School Board Drops Defense of Anti-Evolution Stickers[http://www.aclu.org/religion/intelligentdesign/27745prs20061219.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another example of ACLU litigation was ''[[Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District]].''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District:  &lt;br /&gt;
Decision of the Court, 400 F.Supp.2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005) [http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover_decision.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, also known as the [[Intelligent design]] case. The ACLU prevailed in prohibiting administrators from reading a short statement that mentions [[Intelligent Design]] to students, and forbade the school board from issuing a warning that Darwin's theory has gaps.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F.Supp.2d 707.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In his opinion, Judge [[John E. Jones III]] heavily relied on the later-vacated ruling in ''[[Selman v. Cobb County School District]]'', and on ACLU briefs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;90% of the section on intelligent design was from the ACLU's briefs.  A Comparison of Judge Jones’ Opinion in Kitzmiller v. Dover with Plaintiffs’ Proposed “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law”, by David DeWolf &amp;amp; John West, Discovery Institute, December 12, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/index.php?command=view&amp;amp;id=3829&amp;amp;program=CSC%20-%20Views%20and%20News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   He also cited the [[Establishment test]], the [[Lemon test]], and the [[reasonable student standard]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Kitzmiller,'' 400 F. Supp. 2d at 725 (coming to the conclusion reached in ''Selman'' by the Court's own reasoning), ''compare'' Selman v. Cobb County Sch. Dist, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 13005 (11th Cir. May 25, 2006) at *pincite needed*.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The judge also ordered fees paid to the ACLU and its lawyers, totaling $2,067,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' 42 U.S.C. s 1988 (describing relief afforded victorious plaintiff of a 1983 action as including attorney fees).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Same-sex Marriage==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of New Jersey filed an amicus curiae brief in favor of same-sex marriage in ''Lewis v. Harris'', 188 N.J. 415 (1006).  The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of civil unions, but by a 4-3 margin did not require same-sex marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU sues schools when a student alleges encountering &amp;quot;anti-gay peer harassment and bullying based on his perceived sexual orientation.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aclu.org/lgbt/youth/28618prs20070221.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The ACLU holds the school (and hence the taxpayers) liable for actions based on conduct by some students towards others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU of Minnesota sued to force the Osseo Area School District to grant equal access to the schools public address (PA) system, yearbook, fundraising and field trips by a pro-homosexual school club named the Straights and Gays for Equality (“SAGE”).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Straights &amp;amp; Gays for Equality v. Osseo Area Schs.'', 471 F.3d 908 (8th Cir. 2006).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The school district already had a club entitled &amp;quot;Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transgender, Questioning and Allies,&amp;quot; and already had a SAGE club, but SAGE was designated as non-curricular and wanted the additional rights of communication.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU invoked the Equal Access Act to argue that as long as the school district granted these rights to other clubs, such as cheerleading and synchronized swimming, it must grant these rights to SAGE also.  No, the school district argued in defending its action, cheerleading is related to physical education while SAGE is not, and thus SAGE should not have the same rights.  However, there were other non phys-ed sports that got funding.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The district court ruled in favor of the ACLU, and the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit unanimously affirmed.  The Court ordered the school district to give SAGE the same rights as the cheerleading club.  The ACLU will be able to demand substantial attorneys' fees at taxpayer expense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly, the ACLU of Florida sued the Okeechobee School Board to force it to allow a Gay-Straight Alliance club at Okeechobee High School.  Though the school objected to this club as a &amp;quot;sex-based&amp;quot; club, the ACLU persuaded a federal judge to rule in its favor, and it will likely recover substantial attorneys fees at taxpayer expense.  See ''Gay-Straight Alliance of Okeechobee High Sch. v. School Board of Okeechobee County'', 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25729 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 6, 2007).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Abortion==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU is generally against laws that restrict access to abortion, such as parental notification when a minor seeks an abortion and informed consent for the woman herself. ACLU attorneys have argued several cases in support of abortion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Polygamy==&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU has defended [[polygamy|polygamists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;During a question-and-answer session after a speech at Yale University, ACLU president Nadine Strossen stated that her organization has &amp;quot;defended the right of individuals to engage in polygamy,&amp;quot; [http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44977 World Net Daily] June 25, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aclu.org/religion/frb/16163prs19990716.html ACLU] press release July 16 1999&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ACLU and Medical Records==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief in favor of the privacy of Rush Limbaugh in his medical records when he was under investigation for 'doctor shopping.' The ACLU argued that the privacy rights of a patient were being violated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108140,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Views of the ACLU Founder==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Robert Baldwin, a co-founder of the ACLU and its first leader, was born and raised in Massachusetts. He later said that his “ . . . social work began in my mind in the Unitarian Church when I was ten or twelve years old, and I started to do things that I thought would help other people.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1920 and 1930s he was sympathetic to the social goals and aspirations of the emerging communist nations. In 1934, Balwin published his goals in Soviet Russia Today:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Volokh Conspiracy (blog entry), Eugene Volokh, September 7, 2005 [http://volokh.com/posts/1126138099.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I believe in non-violent methods of struggle as most effective in the long run for building up successful working class power. Where they cannot be followed or where they are not even permitted by the ruling class, obviously only violent tactics remain. I champion civil liberty as the best of the non-violent means of building the power on which workers rule must be based. If I aid the reactionaries to get free speech now and then, if I go outside the class struggle to fight against censorship, it is only because those liberties help to create a more hospitable atmosphere for working class liberties. The class struggle is the central conflict of the world; all others are incidental.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Proletarian Liberty in Practice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When that power of the working class is once achieved, as it has been only in the Soviet Union, I am for maintaining it by any means whatever. Dictatorship is the obvious means in a world of enemies at home and abroad. I dislike it in principle as dangerous to its own objects. But the Soviet Union has already created liberties far greater than exist elsewhere in the world. They are liberties that most closely affect the lives of the people — power in the trade unions, in peasant organizations, in the cultural life of nationalities, freedom of women in public and private life, and a tremendous development of education for adults and children. . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1940 he successfully fought to revise the ACLU charter to prohibit those affiliated with totalitarian organizations from serving on the ACLU board. The immediate target was the former-Wobbly and present Communist Party member, Elizabeth Gurley Flynn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1947 General Douglas MacArthur arranged for Baldwin to serve as a civil liberties consultant in Japan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/blog/baldwin.pdf Baldwin speaks in defense of communism from 1934]&lt;br /&gt;
*Pro-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclu.org&lt;br /&gt;
*Anti-ACLU sites:&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.stoptheaclu.com/&lt;br /&gt;
**http://www.aclj.org&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:liberal activists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Patrick_Henry&amp;diff=190908</id>
		<title>Patrick Henry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Patrick_Henry&amp;diff=190908"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T15:39:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Patrick Henry''' (1736-1799) was a Patriot during the [[American Revolution]], and an anti-Federalist who opposed ratification of the [[U.S. Constitution]] afterwards. A radical democrat, he supported combining the executive and the legislative into a single elected body. An [[attorney]], he prevailed in the Parsons' Cause by defending the right of the [[Virginia]] colony to fix the price of the [[tobacco]] to be paid to the clergy in violation of a contrary ruling in [[England]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americanrevwar.homestead.com/files/HENRY.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patrick Henry is best known today for the rousing speech that he gave on March 23, 1775 to the 2nd Virginia Convention at Richmond's St. John's Church:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.amerisearch.net/index.php?date=2004-03-23&amp;amp;view=View&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery ... We have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated ... We have prostrated ourselves before the throne ... Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence. ...''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''There is a just God who presides over the destines of nations ... who will raise up friends to fight our battle for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave ... Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! '''I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death.''' ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hentry, Patrick}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political people]][[category:United States History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&amp;diff=190900</id>
		<title>Global warming</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Global_warming&amp;diff=190900"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T15:34:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Global warming''' is the term ascribed to an upward trend in the [[global mean temperature]].  Average [[Earth]] surface air temperature has risen just over 1&amp;amp;nbsp;°C since 1850. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hansen's group at the Goddard Institute wrote, &amp;quot;Global warming is now 0.6&amp;amp;nbsp;°C [1.0&amp;amp;nbsp;°F] in the past three decades and 0.8&amp;amp;nbsp;°C [1.4&amp;amp;nbsp;°F] in the past century.&amp;quot; http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2005/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessments by the [[United Nations]] promote the view that most of the warming since around 1850 is likely human-caused. In February, 2007, the [[IPCC|Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]], a body of scientists&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0704280477apr29,1,4275902.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; established by the [[United Nations]], released their fourth assessment report on climate change. That report concluded that most of recent global warming was &amp;quot;very likely&amp;quot; caused by human activity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6321351.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. It says that increases in atmospheric concentrations of [[greenhouse gas]]es cause warming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to temperature reconstruction made within an evolutionary paradigm, there have been many cycles of naturally-caused global warming and cooling over many millions of years (see [[climate cycles]]). Some scientists, including [[Richard Lindzen]] of [[MIT]], [[Sallie Baliunas]] of [[Harvard]] and [[Fred Singer]] (independent), say that the recent warming could be part of another natural cycle or random fluctuations in the atmosphere. However, most scientists agree that human activities are causing the plant to warm. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Hockey Stick Temperature Reconstruction==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hockey stick chart ipcc.jpg|right|thumb|300px|The flawed Hockey Stick graph in a 2001 IPCC report shows blue proxy values along the &amp;quot;shaft&amp;quot; with red instrumental values superimposed as the &amp;quot;blade&amp;quot;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
One of the main pieces of evidence for anthropogenic global warming presented during the 3rd IPCC report was a temperature reconstruction done by climatologist [[Michael Mann]]. The resulting graph of the Northern Hemisphere temperature is shaped like a hockey stick, and it is used as evidence for the unusualness of the earth's temperature in the past few decades.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While dramatic, the graph encountered serious questions from the beginning.  It failed to reproduce two Northern Hemisphere climate episodes that were well documented in the literature, the Medieval Warm Period and The Little Ice Age.   Concerned about these discrepancies, [[Stephen McIntyre]] and [[Canada|Canadian]] economist Ross McKitrick attempted to reproduce the result and discovered a serious flaw in the statistical methods used to construct the hockey stick graph.  Because of this, the 4th Assessment Report of the IPCC included several different temperature reconstruction methods instead of favoring just one hypothesis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Natural variability of the climate system==&lt;br /&gt;
Evolutionary scientists who believe in global warming think that the Earth has experienced numerous [[Ice Age|ice age]]s over two million years, during which global temperatures dropped approximately 6 degrees Celsius and then returned to normal. The frigid temperatures allowed ice sheets to expand southward, covering much of [[Asia]], [[Europe]], and [[North America]]. The cooling associated with ice ages is gradual, while the terminations are relatively rapid. However, even the rapid terminations of ice ages take centuries to millennia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Global Warming on other Planets==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the [[Viking spacecraft]] reached [[Mars]] in the 1970s until recent readings were taken, the average temperature on Mars has risen 1.1 degrees Fahrenheit just as the average temperature on the earth has risen.  Since human industrialization is clearly not to blame for the change on Mars, other causes are being considered.  One possibility is that dust storms are changing the albedo of the planet, allowing it to warm, while another possibility is that solar variations from the sun are causing the warming.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070404_gw_mars.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17977&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recently, it has also been found that similar to the Earth and Mars, [[Neptune]] is also undergoing global warming.  Measurements taken at the Lowell observatory in [[Arizona]] have shown an increase in Neptune's brightness and temperature since 1980 following the same pattern seen on Earth and Mars.  The researchers who discovered this warming suggest there may be a correlation between the warming and solar variations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007.../2006GL028764.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pluto]] has also been found to be undergoing global warming.  The overall temperature increase on Pluto has been greater than that on the earth.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/pluto_warming_021009.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics of global warming==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The global average surface temperature warmed about 0.5&amp;amp;nbsp;°C (0.9&amp;amp;nbsp;°F) over the second half of the 20th Century, and to some the warming appears to be related to increases in [[carbon dioxide]] and other greenhouse gases. The possibility of adverse consequences has become a major concern for environmentalists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assessments of climate science by the [[United Nations]] (see [[IPCC]] - ''Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'')&lt;br /&gt;
have claimed that scientists are 90% sure that over 50% of the observed global warming in recent decades is human-caused, and that continued global warming should be expected over at least the next century. ''Science'' published a literature search by Naomi Oreskes concluding that &amp;quot;scientific consensus&amp;quot; supports the IPCC reports. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several prominent scientists have pointed out the [[politicized science]] of the UN's assessment methods. The scientific reports are submitted to a panel of representatives appointed by each country in the IPCC. Several scientists whose research demonstrates that climate change is taking place have complained about their work being misrepresented by the U.N. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
58% of the 279 climate scientists working at US federal agences who responded to a survey by The Union of Concerned Scientists reported 435 incidents of political interference over the past five years and that they had experienced at least one of these constraints: &lt;br /&gt;
* “Pressure to eliminate the words ‘climate change,’ ‘global warming’, or other similar terms” from their communications. &lt;br /&gt;
* Editing of scientific reports by their superiors which “changed the meaning of scientific findings”. &lt;br /&gt;
* Statements by officials at their agencies which misrepresented their findings. &lt;br /&gt;
* “The disappearance or unusual delay of websites, reports, or other science-based materials relating to climate”. &lt;br /&gt;
* “New or unusual administrative requirements that impair climate-related work”. &lt;br /&gt;
* “Situations in which scientists have actively objected to, resigned from, or removed themselves from a project because of pressure to change scientific findings.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, those who believe that either global warming is not a real phenomenon or that humanity's contribution to it has been overstated have made similar complaints. The UCS states in its report about the IPCC &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/the-ipcc.html &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; 	 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Climate contrarians frequently claim that the IPCC produces politically motivated reports that show only one side of the issues. Given the many stages at which experts from across the political and scientific spectrum are included in the process, however, this is a difficult position to defend. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;	 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; Furthermore, according to IPCC principles, lead authors are “required to record views in the text which are scientifically or technically valid, even if they cannot be reconciled with a consensus view.”&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is widely held belief among the American public that global warming is a reality. A poll conducted March 11-14 of 2007 found that the majority of the American public (59%) believes we are already seeing the effects of global warming, an additional 3% and 8% respectively believe they will see the effects with in a few years or within their lifetime, and 19% believe that global warming will be seen, not in their lifetime, but in future generations—only a small minority (8%) believe that global warming will never happen. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Poling report on Gallup poll for March 11-14, 2007[http://www.pollingreport.com/enviro.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fossil-fuel industry could be adversely affected by global warming legislation. Exxon-Mobil has been accused of supporting research on global warming, and some of that has differed from conventional wisdom. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/global_warming/exxon_report.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.net.org/warming/skeptic.vtml &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.exxonsecrets.org/html/listorganizations.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scientists ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rogerrevelle.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Roger Revelle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;35%&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Roger Revelle]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Achim Steiner]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fred Singer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Richard Lindzen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sallie Baliunas]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lonnie Thompson]]&lt;br /&gt;
| valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;33%&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James E. Hansen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Michael Mann]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Charles Keeling]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Edwin A. Hernández-Delgado]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~motl/global-temperature-not-exist.pdf Does a global temperature exist?], ''Journal of Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics'', June 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://environment.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,2032821,00.html The appliance of science] by Mike Hulme.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.climatecrisis.net/ ''An Inconvenient Truth''], Film by [[Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2332531355859226455&amp;amp;q=great+global+warming+swindle ''The Great Global Warming Swindle'' - Documentary Film]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.harvard.edu/%7Emotl/iris-effect.pdf Climate Sensitivity and Observed Negative Feedbacks], lecture by Richard Lindzen and Roberto Rondanelli.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.physics.harvard.edu/%7Emotl/lindzen-nature-of-arguments.pdf Nature of Arguments for Anthropogenic Global Warming], by Richard Lindzen&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/store/book_detail.asp?bookID=42 ''Hot Talk, Cold Science: Global Warmings's Unfinished Debate'', by S. Fred Singer]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html Global Warming: The Origin and Nature of the Alleged Scientific Consensus] - [[Richard S. Lindzen]], Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=47&amp;amp;articleID=604 &amp;quot;Should We Have Acted Thirty Years Ago to Prevent Climate Change?&amp;quot;, by Randall G. Holcombe].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/tir/article.asp?issueID=25&amp;amp;articleID=296 &amp;quot;After Kyoto: A Global Scramble for Advantage,&amp;quot; by Bruce Yandle].&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=2319 The physical evidence of earth's unstoppable 1,500-year climate cycle]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/article.asp?id=1714 &amp;quot;Is There a Basis for Global Warming Alarm?&amp;quot;, by Richard Lindzen]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.org/publications/policy_reports/detail.asp?type=full&amp;amp;id=5 &amp;quot;New Perspectives in Climate Change: What the EPA Isn’t Telling Us&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.heartland.org/Article.cfm?artId=17181 Survey Shows Climatologists Are Split on Global Warming]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.magma.ca/~hurleyp/FightingTheHoax.htm Fighting the Hoax]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.climateaudit.org Climate Audit], Steve McIntyre's blog&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.realclimate.org Real Climate], blog by a group of climatologists including Michael Mann&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Critique of the Hokey Stick Reconstruction==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.climateaudit.org/pdf/mcintyre.mckitrick.2003.pdf Corrections To The Mann et. al. (1998) Proxy Data Base And Northern Hemispheric Average Temperature Series] by Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, ''Energy &amp;amp; Enviornment'' volume 14, 2003.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/2007/05/the_decay_of_the_hockey_stick.html The Decay of the Hockey Stick by Von Storch] published on the journal ''Nature'''s blog, May 3, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/13830/ A Global Warming Bombshell] by Richard A. Muller, ''Technology Review'' , Oct. 2004; calls into question famous graph by Michael Mann.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/306/5696/679 Reconstructing Past Climate from Noisy Data] by Hans von Storch, Eduardo Zorita, Julie M. Jones, Yegor Dimitriev, Fidel González-Rouco, Simon F. B. Tett, ''Science'' magazine, 22 October 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:earth science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Bias]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=May_Day&amp;diff=190888</id>
		<title>May Day</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=May_Day&amp;diff=190888"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T15:23:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;May day, the 1st of May, is celebrated internationally as a day to honor the contributions of workers. Started in the United States as an outgrowth of the Haymarket labor unrest of 1886, it was co-opted by communist governments worldwide and used to celebrate that form of government. With the general demise of communist governments it has evolved into a day to celebrate labor and progressive causes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Al_Qaeda&amp;diff=190880</id>
		<title>Al Qaeda</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Al_Qaeda&amp;diff=190880"/>
		<updated>2007-06-06T15:16:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Kei: inserted Report's conclusion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{expand}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:al_qaeda.jpg|right|thumb|250px|Osama bin Laden with Al-Qaeda members]]&lt;br /&gt;
al-Qaeda is an international Islamist [[terrorism|terrorist]] organization founded in the late 1980s to fight the [[Red Army]] of the [[Soviet Union]] in [[Afghanistan]], during the 1980-89 [[Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan]]. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, Osama bin Bin Ladin and his comrades had their own sources of support and training, and they received little or no assistance from the United States,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;9/11 Commission Report[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/sec2.pdf ''The Foundation of the New Terrorism''], pg. 56.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which only provided funding to indigenous Afghan ''mujaheddin'', which al-Qaeda was not. It is currently led by [[Osama Bin Laden]] and is predominantly composed of fanatical [[Sunni]] [[Islam|Muslim]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Al Qaeda is responsible for the September 11, 2001 attack on the [[World Trade Center]] and [[The Pentagon|Pentagon]], the bombings of American embassies in [[Kenya]] and [[Tanzania]] in 1998, the October 2000 bombing of the [[USS Cole]], and numerous smaller attacks. The group's wing in Iraq is believed to be responsible for many of the attacks and bombings there. The 9/11 Commission Report has tied al-Qaeda to the government of [[Ba'ath Party|Ba'athist]] government of [[Saddam Hussein]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;9/11 Commission Report, ''The Foundation of the New Terrorism''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; specifically the alleged harboring of al-Qaeda second-in-command [[Abu Musab al-Zarqawi]] and cooperation in Saddam;'s war against the kurds.  the 9/11 Commssion Report cites Bin laden meeting with iraqi intelligence officials in Khatroum as early as 1995. However, the report on page 66 also concludes that &amp;quot; . . . to date we have seen no evidence that these or the earlier contacts ever developed into a collaborative operational relationship. Nor have we seen evidence indicating that Iraq cooperated with al Qaeda in developing or carrying out any attacks against the United States.&amp;quot;   It is unclear if Iraq was funding al-Qaeda operations prior to the [[War in Iraq|2003 invasion]]. &amp;quot;Al Qaeda&amp;quot; is roughly equivalent to &amp;quot;the base&amp;quot; ( القاعدة) in [[Arabic]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;However difficult the fight in Iraq has become, we must win it,&amp;quot; Mr. Bush said during a commencement speech at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Conn. &amp;quot;Al Qaeda is public enemy No. 1 for Iraq's young democracy. Al Qaeda is public enemy No. 1 for America as well.&amp;quot; [http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070523-115137-6054r.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/world/2001/war_on_terror/default.stm BBC Profile of Al-Qaeda]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070523-115137-6054r.htm Bush shares al Qaeda plans] - Jon Ward, ''Washington Times'' - May 24, 2007 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terrorists]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Kei</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>