<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JoakimV</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JoakimV"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/JoakimV"/>
	<updated>2026-10-15T04:57:49Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Denmark&amp;diff=1023582</id>
		<title>Talk:Denmark</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Denmark&amp;diff=1023582"/>
		<updated>2012-12-16T22:06:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JoakimV: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Now, firstly, Denmark is not socialist neither politically nor economically. Anyone who thinks so clearly lacks understanding of what exactly a socialist system entails. And secondly:&lt;br /&gt;
:''Denmark has a ludicrously lax legal system, where criminals are barely punished, but instead they are educated and cared for by what is meant to be a penal system.''&lt;br /&gt;
My only reaction: What? [[User:AKjeldsen|AKjeldsen]] 07:19, 22 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi. two issues:&lt;br /&gt;
1. Danish politics are not liberal, not even by the terminology you are using in America.&lt;br /&gt;
2. The geography entry sounds like Denmark is centered around the Jutland peninsula. &amp;quot;Two autonomous provinces with home rule are considered part of Denmark despite their distance from the Jutland Peninsula.&amp;quot; It generally sounds wrong.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:JoakimV|JoakimV]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JoakimV</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Denmark&amp;diff=1023581</id>
		<title>Talk:Denmark</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Denmark&amp;diff=1023581"/>
		<updated>2012-12-16T22:05:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JoakimV: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Now, firstly, Denmark is not socialist neither politically nor economically. Anyone who thinks so clearly lacks understanding of what exactly a socialist system entails. And secondly:&lt;br /&gt;
:''Denmark has a ludicrously lax legal system, where criminals are barely punished, but instead they are educated and cared for by what is meant to be a penal system.''&lt;br /&gt;
My only reaction: What? [[User:AKjeldsen|AKjeldsen]] 07:19, 22 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi. two issues:&lt;br /&gt;
1. Danish politics are not liberal, not even by the terminology you are using in America.&lt;br /&gt;
2. The geography entry sounds like Denmark is centered around the Jutland peninsula. &amp;quot;Two autonomous provinces with home rule are considered part of Denmark despite their distance from the Jutland Peninsula.&amp;quot; It generally sounds wrong.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JoakimV</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>