<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JimBeam</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JimBeam"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/JimBeam"/>
	<updated>2026-10-11T00:27:47Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Liberal_hypocrisy&amp;diff=244559</id>
		<title>Talk:Liberal hypocrisy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Liberal_hypocrisy&amp;diff=244559"/>
		<updated>2007-07-22T14:04:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JimBeam: /* This should be merged */ Yeah!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== This should be merged ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shouldn't this article really just be titled &amp;quot;hypocrisy&amp;quot; with a note that liberals often engage in this type of behavior?  It could be its own category - blended together with [[deceit]], the [[occult]], etc.  --[[User:LiteratiChamp|LiteratiChamp]] 19:07, 20 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Too early for that. Let the articles develop separately first; we can always generalize later. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:22, 20 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't calling someone a hypocrite for the actions of the ''characters they play'' a bit of a stretch? I mean, is that the best you can do? There are surely much better examples than that. It just seems desperate. Are we going to see an article saying that Anthony Hopkins is a hypocrite because he does not believe in genocide, but in ''The Bunker'' he played Hitler, a man who is one of history's greatest perpertrators of genocide? [[User:PortlyMort|PortlyMort]] 09:04, 21 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It depends on what they say and do after they leave the set.  Anthony Hopkins isn't going around saying Hitler was a kind man while he was a dictator.  You see, I don't like PETA screaming that dolphins are dying in tuna nets while not saying anything about the tuna.  I don't it when Al Gore demands we stop polluting the atmosphere, yet it's OK for him to drive huge gas-guzzlers and giant jumbo jets.  Get the picture?  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:27, 21 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This all started for me when I had an on-line conversation some years ago in one of the Dalnet channels.  A man appeared and wanted to talk about the environment, specifically oil production and how he can get people against it.  He revealed himself as a member of Greenpeace.  When I badgered him as to what car he drove, he told the other members of the group it was a Honda, one of those gas-miser cars.  Then I said something that got that hypocrite to voluntarily get out of the channel:&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;So, you can protest all the oil companies you want, yet you have the gall to put their products in your own car?&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
That is the kind of hypocrisy I don't like.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 22:38, 21 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah! Its like criticising Wikipedia but using [http://www.mediawiki.org their software].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JimBeam</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>