https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Jasonc65Conservapedia - User contributions [en]2026-10-09T17:44:04ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.35.14https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Anthropology&diff=446708Talk:Anthropology2008-05-04T20:41:47Z<p>Jasonc65: New page: Someone should comment on the domination of anthropology departments by liberals, and also then numerous Marxist schools of thought within the field, such as "cultural materialism". Some ...</p>
<hr />
<div>Someone should comment on the domination of anthropology departments by liberals, and also then numerous Marxist schools of thought within the field, such as "cultural materialism". Some liberal ideas have been planted in my mind from an anthropology course. --[[User:Jasonc65|Jason]] 16:41, 4 May 2008 (EDT)</div>Jasonc65https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Nelson_Mandela&diff=445580Talk:Nelson Mandela2008-05-03T14:32:38Z<p>Jasonc65: Mandela and Bush</p>
<hr />
<div>Oh, a head of state. Wasn't he a terrorist, too? --[[User:Wing Nut|Wing Nut]] 14:38, 31 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
:Quite right. The [[liberals]] are trying to cover that up.<br />
:''4. We do not attempt to be neutral to all points of view. We are neutral to the facts. If a group is a terrorist group, then the label "[[terrorist]]" is used here but not on Wikipedia.'' (See [[Differences_with_Wikipedia]])<br />
:[[User:BillyBoy|BillyBoy]] 14:43, 31 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
<br />
If your definition of "terrorist" is elastic enough to include Mandela and the struggle for racial freedom in South Africa, it's elastic enough to include George Washington and the American Revolution. There are times when violence is the only available recourse in the pursuit of freedom. Apartheid - like "taxation without representation" was one of those times. [[User:Jacobin|Jacobin]] 17:51, 14 April 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Such rediculous comparisons are hardly benignant or applicable Jacobin. The ANC (speaking specifically in regards to Umkhonto we Sizwe, of which Mandela was head) was under all prexisting contexts a terrorist organization, and cocurrently, there ''was'' a reason Mandela was in prison in the first place. Killing Civilians, especially women and children to reach your goals is hardly an admirable nor honorable action of which you so hastily ignore under the pretext of persuing racial freedom. <br />
[[User:Willink|Willink]] 17:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
There is no mention of the Mandela's criticisms of Bush: a point that the liberal Wikipedia is not remiss in making. Conservatives would want to know what this man stands for. [[User:Jasonc65|Jason]] 10:33, 03 May 2007 (EDT)</div>Jasonc65