<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JHill</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JHill"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/JHill"/>
	<updated>2026-09-30T19:11:42Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=608226</id>
		<title>Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=608226"/>
		<updated>2009-01-11T23:04:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JHill: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Some suggestions==&lt;br /&gt;
How about 'responsibility' (1737) and 'self-discipline' (1838)? [[User:MikeSalter|MikeSalter]] 08:58, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Superb ideas!!!  Fantastic.  Please add them.  I have some that will add also.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 09:19, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list is good, but it doesn't say why they are ''conservative'' words. Perhaps something could be added related to this? Also, I have a suggestion: 'Rags to Riches'? *Hopeful* [[User:ETrundel|ETrundel]] 11:13, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What are the criteria for &amp;quot;conservative words&amp;quot; (as distinct from &amp;quot;liberal words&amp;quot;?)  [[User:Reg32Idaho|Reg32Idaho]] 14:10, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As per &amp;quot;radar&amp;quot;, I suggest &amp;quot;sonar&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;laser&amp;quot; (also acronyms, from similar domain), and &amp;quot;radio&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: (edit conflict) Words that express more precisely a conservative concept, or criticize more effectively a liberal characteristic.  I'm going to insert Mike Salter's suggestions above, for example, and feel free to add your own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: The distribution of the words as a function of time (and perhaps what was happening at the time) will become illuminating.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:20, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: P.S. I don't see sonar, laser and radio as adding any conservative insight.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:20, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Understood. But &amp;quot;radar&amp;quot; does? [[User:Reg32Idaho|Reg32Idaho]] 14:27, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::: Yes, because it was the first and it has broader use than your other example.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:28, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::: I understand precedence going to the earliest word, but don't see how &amp;quot;radar&amp;quot; expresses more precisely a conservative concept, or criticizes more effectively a liberal characteristic. [[User:Reg32Idaho|Reg32Idaho]] 14:33, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::: Your point is well-taken, and I agree this is borderline.  However, I would still say that &amp;quot;radar&amp;quot; is a conservative concept/insight that is used effectively to convey a powerful conservative idea.  Let's see what others think before deleting it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:57, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I'm not sure how radar is a conservative concept either, or what idea it conveys when it's used. It's merely a technology. Should we add aeroplanes, TNT and computers to the list? --[[User:JHill|JHill]] 18:04, 11 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here's two: &lt;br /&gt;
*pro-life ([http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=pro-life 1976], though I'd prefer a better citation since the quote they have underneath is very anti-conservative.)&lt;br /&gt;
*normalcy (1920 in the Conservative sense, although dated back to 1857 in a mathematical sense. In a rare glimmer of unbiased truth on a political subject, the WP article even states: ''&amp;quot;Furthermore, the concept apparently encapsulated what Americans wanted, since he was elected president over his Democratic opponent James Cox by the greatest margin since the popular vote was introduced.&amp;quot;'')&lt;br /&gt;
-[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 14:40, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Fantastic suggestions, both of them.  Very insightful.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 14:57, 10 January 2009 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JHill</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Hand&amp;diff=596016</id>
		<title>Talk:Hand</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Hand&amp;diff=596016"/>
		<updated>2008-12-28T23:03:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JHill: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Perhaps a more anatomy-orientated article might be better here? --[[User:Jeremiah4-22|Jeremiah4-22]] 12:10, 8 April 2007 (EDT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very silly article...rewrite needed.  Is there even a need for an article on hands?--[[User:palmd001|PalMD]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User_talk:palmd001|talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:14, 8 April 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've added an anatomy section which at least lays out the basics, but it's severely lacking. Better than before though. --[[User:JHill|JHill]] 18:03, 28 December 2008 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JHill</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hand&amp;diff=596013</id>
		<title>Hand</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hand&amp;diff=596013"/>
		<updated>2008-12-28T23:00:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JHill: Added anatomy section, removed some fluff, vandalism&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Tst456yh.svg|right|thumb|Palm of left hand, showing position of skin creases and bones, and surface markings for the volar arches.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The human '''hand''' is one of God's most amazing creations, and allows us to manipulate our environment to an extraordinary degree with fine precision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anatomy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human hand consists of 27 [[bones]] - two rows of carpals forming the wrist (consisting of the scaphoid, lunate, triquetral and pisiform proximally, and the trapezoid, trapezium, capitate and hamate distally), followed by five metacarpals forming the palm, and 3 phalanges for each finger (proximal, distal and intermediate) and 2 phalanges for the thumb. These bones provide the attachments for the tendons of the long muscles originating from the humerus and the radius and ulner bones of the forearm, as well as the short muscles of the hand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wrist is controlled by 4 muscles - the extensor carpi radialis and ulnaris and flexor carpi radialis and ulnaris. Attached to the carpal bones of the wrist, these muscles allow for flexion, extension, abduction, adduction and circumduction. The fingers and thumb are also largely controlled by muscles arising in the forearm, their tendons passing under retinaculums (stong fibrous bands at joints, forming the carpal tunnel ) at the wrist to prevent them bow stringing during flexion and extension. Small muscles in the hand provide additional mobility to the digits, such as the interossei muscles, located between the metacarpals, which abduct and adduct the fingers, and the various muscles of the thenar eminence which provide the ability to oppose thumb and forefinger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These muscles are innervated by the ulnar, radial and median nerves.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1285060-overview&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Hand Throughout The Animal Kingdom ==&lt;br /&gt;
Structures in the human hand are remarkably similar throughout the mammal kingdom and even birds and reptiles. Most [[mammals]] have comparable bones, although significantly distorted (such as in a horse's [[hoof]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://universe-review.ca/I10-82-limbs.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other than humans, the only other species with opposable thumbs are other primates, such as [[chimpanzees]]. &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The opposable [[thumb]] makes it possible to grasp branches and manipulate tools. Although the human hand is not nearly as strong as a that of a [[chimpanzee]], when a person turns his or her hand to a task he or she can build enormous skyscrapers or tiny electronic circuits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Hands.jpg|left|thumb|200px|A human left hand (back and palm).]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anatomy]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JHill</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>