<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JBauer</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=JBauer"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/JBauer"/>
	<updated>2026-10-12T13:15:44Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=1099749</id>
		<title>Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=1099749"/>
		<updated>2014-08-14T04:16:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JBauer: /* Conservative words and terms */ fix&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--[[Image:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|200px|The &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; slogan stuck to [[Harry Hopkins]] like a well-fitted suit.]]--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Conservative words.jpg|thumb|300px|The growth in conservative words on an annual basis (red), compared with a geometric growth rate (Courtesy [[User:Jcw]])]][[Conservative]] terms, expressing [[conservative insights]], originate at a faster rate and with higher quality than [[liberal]] terms do.  Conservative triumph over liberalism is thus inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each year the [[English language]] develops about a thousand new words.  The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; many good words have developed since.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Powerful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century.  For each new conservative term originating in the 1600s,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The King James Version of the Bible was published in 1611, by then [[William Shakespeare]] had written nearly all his plays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of &amp;quot;1-2-4-8&amp;quot;.  This demonstrates that the future is increasingly conservative.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Conservative Terms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|36&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|72&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|144&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|290&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|29 (preliminary)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservative words and terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--{| align=lwft border=1 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | Newest Layer by century, 1600s-1900s&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; 0-0-0-0&lt;br /&gt;
|}--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|a.m.&lt;br /&gt;
|1762&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;a.m.&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;before noon&amp;quot; in [[Latin]] (ante meridiem); it became popular much as &amp;quot;[[A.D.]]&amp;quot; did.  Also, a morning [[work ethic]] is a conservative concept.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[abstract nonsense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for unnecessarily abstract mathematics of doubtful rigor; [[liberal denial]] insists that this term, which describes something as &amp;quot;nonsense&amp;quot;, is somehow not negative!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[accountability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|the willingness or obligation to be held responsible for one's actions- a fundamental conservative ideal, unlike liberals who believe that 'society,' and not individuals, is responsible for their wrongdoing. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|accuracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives strive for accuracy, while many liberals are masters of [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|act of God&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From ''Pollard v. Shaaffer'', 1 U.S. 210, 213 (1 Dall. 210) (Pa. S.Ct. 1787): &amp;quot;In the case before the court, if the lessee had covenanted for himself and his assigns, to deliver up the tenements in good order and repair, notwithstanding they should be destroyed by act of God or of an Enemy, then this action would certainly lie, because of the special express words; but when there are no such words, but only generally to repair &amp;amp;c. would it be reasonable to construe these words so as to extend to the cases put?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster asserts a date of origin of 1635 in its online version [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/act%20of%20god], but 1859 in its 10th edition print version.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an extraordinary, unforeseeable event, such as a massive flood or earthquake; term was probably inspired as a reference to the [[Great Flood]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action-at-a-distance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1693&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Newton]]'s acceptance of this concept -- which became fundamental to [[electrostatics]] and [[quantum mechanics]] and has a basis in Christianity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', [[Jesus]]'s cure of the centurion's slave.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; -- was central to the development of his theory of gravity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Materialists]] censor this concept, while Einstein criticized it  as &amp;quot;spooky&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|activism&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|this differentiates conservatives from inactive people; this term might have originated in connection with [[Prohibition]] and efforts to pass the [[Eighteenth Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|addictive&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|the intrinsic characteristic of certain things or activities to induce repetitious involvement, usually with a harmful effect on the participant, as in [[gambling]], or [[video games]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|aerobics&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by the [[Christian]] Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianadvice.net/famous_christians.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to describe his self-help program to improve health; he gave the title &amp;quot;Aerobics&amp;quot; to his ground-breaking book in 1968, and eventually it revolutionized attitudes toward exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|agency capture&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The concept originated a bit earlier, but its first best articulation was when a federal court recognized that &amp;quot;agency capture&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;where the regulated become the regulators.&amp;quot;  ''Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. Pontiac'', 612 F. Supp. 654, 663 (E.D. Mich. 1985).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the misuse of Big Government (agencies) by Big Business to choke off free enterprise through regulations that impede competition&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|agitprop&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda designed to incite agitation, originally coined to describe communist propaganda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|alarmism&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|needless warnings, as in the politically motivated claims of [[global warming]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{#ifexist: alcoholism | [[alcoholism]] | alcoholism }}&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive or addictive drinking of alcohol&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|algorithm&lt;br /&gt;
|1849&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient and consistent step-by-step methodology for achieving a goal, the opposite of [[liberal style]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|altruism&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|selfless assistance of others; this also occurs in the animal kingdom, and is a [[counterexample to evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ambulance chaser&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|a lawyer who searches for victims to persuade them to sue for his profit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American dream]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1911 is the date given by the &amp;quot;OED&amp;quot;, which refers to the Oxford English Dictionary. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives a date of 1931.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the vision that, with hard work, anyone in American can attain happiness and prosperity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American exceptionalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1835&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that the United States and the American people hold a special place in the world, by offering opportunity and hope for humanity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|American Way&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&lt;br /&gt;
|later conservative entrepreneurs used this to coin a new name for what became a highly successful and uniquely American business model: &amp;quot;Amway&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[anti-Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing Christian ideals and institutions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anticompetitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1854&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with open competition and the enormous benefits that flow from it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|antilife&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|term criticizing a tendency to oppose life and lifesaving care&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|antitrust&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&lt;br /&gt;
|the origin is the passage of the [[Republican]]-sponsored [[Sherman Act]] to prohibit restraints of trade, one of the greatest pieces of legislation in all of history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apathetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1744&lt;br /&gt;
|term critical of the those who are deliberately inactive and disengaged mentally&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Apostles' Creed]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1658&lt;br /&gt;
|a concise statement of [[Christian]] [[faith]] that began with the original [[Apostles]] and has guided billions since. (The earliest historical evidence of the creed's existence is in a letter written by the Council of Milan in 390 A.D. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianitytoday.com/biblestudies/articles/churchhomeleadership/080730.html Christianity Today]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apparatchik&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|an official who blindly does what he thinks his government superiors want, as in [[communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apple pie&lt;br /&gt;
|1780&lt;br /&gt;
|honesty, simplicity, wholesomeness. Relating to, or characterized by traditionally American values. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apple%20pie Merriam-webster- Apple pie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|assimilate&lt;br /&gt;
|1880s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;estimate only; this originated sometime in the late 1880s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the desired absorption of immigrant groups into the culture and mores of the resident population&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|atheistic&lt;br /&gt;
|1625-35&lt;br /&gt;
|An adjective pertaining to or characteristic of atheists or atheism; containing, suggesting, or disseminating atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|attention span&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|correlated with intelligence, the attention span is how long someone can concentrate on something.  It is rapidly shortening; the Lincoln-Douglas debates 150 years ago lasted for hours, but none do today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.help4teachers.com/ras.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The average length of sentences in speech is another indication of attention span, and it has been shortening significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Austrian economics&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A more precise date is welcome; &amp;quot;Austrian school&amp;quot; was coined a bit earlier, initially as a derisive term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to economics that emphasizes the purposeful decisions of individuals, and which was belatedly recognized by a 1974 [[Nobel Prize]] to [[Friedrich von Hayek]]; these economic ideas influenced [[Ludwig von Mises]], [[Ron Paul]], and 1987 Nobel Laureate James M. Buchanan.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|axiomatic&lt;br /&gt;
|1797&lt;br /&gt;
|self-evident (first usage), and later it developed the meaning of being based on a set of axioms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|baby boom&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/baby-boomer.html Baby boomer] phrases.org.uk, retrieved August 30, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in birthrate, which is a good thing; note that what is known as post-World War II baby boom actually started before the war, contrary to what textbooks teach. Perpetuating the mistake, the U.S. Census Bureau counts the generation born between 1946 and 1964 as the baby boomers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/cb06-ffse01-2.html Newsroom: Facts for Features - Special Edition - The Oldest Baby Boomers Turn 60!]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|back burner&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|inactive status away from attention, as in &amp;quot;RINOs try to put social issues on the back burner&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bag lady&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|a woman, typically unmarried, whose life tragically degenerated into a homeless existence of wandering in a city while carrying bags of worthless possessions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bailout]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|wasting taxpayer money to rescue, temporarily, a failing company&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bake sale&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Citizen Patriot of Jackson, Michigan, “Albion,” pg. 6, (Nov. 21, 1903) [http://www.redstate.com/barrypopik/2011/03/27/origin-of-the-bake-sale-and-maddows-bakesales-for-bombersbakesales-or-billionaires/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the activity of volunteers, typically women, baking good food and selling it to raise money for a worthy cause&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|balkanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|to break a region or neighborhood into divisive components; the opposite of the American concept of assimilation or &amp;quot;[[E pluribus unum]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|an American original that is governed by rules rather than a clock; the stars and fans are overwhelmingly conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bedrock&lt;br /&gt;
|1840-1850&lt;br /&gt;
|an American term for unbroken solid rock underneath fragments or soil, which adopted the figurative meaning of strong values:  &amp;quot;bedrock principles&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bedrock&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|beltway mentality&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Paul Weyrich]] though possibly first used by then-Governor [[John Sununu]] (&amp;quot;captives of yourselves&amp;quot;), it refers to a governing style that sees only as far as the highway that surrounds its capital, especially the one around D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|benchmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1842&lt;br /&gt;
|a quality standard for which people can strive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Best of the Public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|A term coined by [[Andy Schlafly]] to express the idea that one does not need [[liberal]] credentials that so-called &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; have.  Indeed, many great historical figures would have failed the liberal &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; test.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biased&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|to show prejudice for or against something; American society is rapidly becoming ''biased'' against Christian and Conservative beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Biblophobic&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianpost.com/news/pastor-greg-laurie-i-hate-the-word-homophobic-83209/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|hatred or fear of the [[Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bidenism&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|an idiotic remark that would subject the politician to enormous ridicule if he were a [[conservative]], but when spoken by [[liberal]] [[Joe Biden]] the media are just fine with it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Big Brother&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|government constantly watching its citizens; [[George Orwell]] first coined this term in his classic, ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biological clock&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how each woman begins to lose her ability to have children at age 27, no matter how much [[feminists]] try to conceal this scientific fact from women&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blame America Crowd&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or &amp;quot;Blame-America-First Crowd&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Barone quoted [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]] as saying that the &amp;quot;San Francisco Democrats&amp;quot; (site of the Democratic National Convention in 1984) &amp;quot;always blame America first.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creators.com/opinion/michael-barone/the-blame-america-first-crowd.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blank check&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|irresponsibly giving someone unlimited spending authority or power, as in &amp;quot;a Con Con would be a blank check to destroy the nation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blather&lt;br /&gt;
|1719&lt;br /&gt;
|nonsensical or insignificant babble, as in &amp;quot;liberal blather is common in the [[lamestream media]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Blue Dog Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who adheres to conservative principles within the Democratic party, once called a Boll Weevil; as of 2009 there are 45-50 Blue Dog Democrats in the [[House of Representatives]], which is enough to form a majority with [[Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boomerang&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|originally coined to describe a throwing device that returns to the thrower, the term became increasingly useful to describe how wrongful conduct returns to bite the perpetrator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boondoggle&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;popularized during the [[New Deal]] as a contemptuous word for make-work projects for the unemployed.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=boondoggle&amp;amp;searchmode=none&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term gained popularity in [[Canada]] following a corruption scandal tied to the [[Liberal]] government in 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bootstrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|unaided effort, personal merit, hard work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bork&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by William Safire to refer to how Democrats savage a conservative nominee, such as their defeat of Supreme Court nominee [[Robert H. Bork]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|born-again&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|it takes an open mind and heart&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bottom line&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|the essential point, without the [[liberal claptrap]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original usage of the term the &amp;quot;bottom line&amp;quot; had nothing to do with money.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainstorm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|a burst of productive thought&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from the Chinese term &amp;quot;xǐnǎo&amp;quot; soon after the [[communist]] takeover of China, &amp;quot;brainwashing&amp;quot; means forced abandonment of [[faith]] in favor of regimented [[atheism]]. In a more general sense, it refers to the manipulation and control of the human mind through torture and propaganda techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bright-line rule&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First used by [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[John Harlan II]] in ''United States v. Jorn'', 400 U.S. 470, 486 (1971), where he rejected adopting a bright-line rule for that case.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a clear, unwavering line dividing what is allowed from what is prohibited; increasingly favored to avoid confusion and requirements that arbitrarily change&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brinkmanship&lt;br /&gt;
|1956&lt;br /&gt;
|the art of displaying a willingness to use military force in order to obtain a just resolution to a conflict between nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bureaucracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|busywork&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|meaningless activity under the pretense of accomplishing something&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|can-do&lt;br /&gt;
|1903 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; according to the Oxford English Dictionary. [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/can-do Miram-webster] gives the date of 1945 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Phrase coined in a short story by [[Rudyard Kipling]] that has come to refer to an attitude that espouses individual ability and responsibility and not reliance on [[entitlements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-1855&lt;br /&gt;
|creating jobs and wealth based on a private invention, ownership and investments rather than state-controlled resources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|career politician&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First use found by ''Conservapedia'' was in an article describing a controversy in communist [[Yugoslavia]] over their &amp;quot;career politicians,&amp;quot; published in the ''New York Times'' and authored by Malcolm W. Browne, sect. 4, p. 3, col. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term used for the entrenched communist government officials in Yugoslavia, with whom even President Tito was fed up&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carpetbagger]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|a politician who moves to a new area to be elected to a government position, as in [[Hillary Clinton]] moving to [[New York]] to become a U.S. Senator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|carte blanche&lt;br /&gt;
|1645-1655&lt;br /&gt;
|unconditional authority or power, without any limits on misuse of that power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cash discount&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|a reduction in price for payment by cash, in recognition of how cash is more efficient&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|catharsis&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating forgiveness and spiritual renewal by expression, as in writing or teaching or confession&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|caucus&lt;br /&gt;
|1763&lt;br /&gt;
|citizens or representatives gathering to meet and reach political decisions as a group while harnessing aspects of the [[best of the public]]; first coined by [[John Adams]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The future author of the Massachusetts Constitution who also played a role in developing the [[Declaration of Independence]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when he described a meeting of political Boston elders as a &amp;quot;caucus club&amp;quot;; the word may be from an Algonquian term for a group of advisers or elders.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cesspool&lt;br /&gt;
|1782&lt;br /&gt;
|an evil or corrupt place or state.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chaperone&lt;br /&gt;
|1720&lt;br /&gt;
|care and well-being of youths overseen by adults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|charisma&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|literally &amp;quot;a gift from God&amp;quot;, charisma is a personal magic of leadership found in [[conservative]] public figures (but beware of the liberal tendency to put style before substance!) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chicken Little&lt;br /&gt;
|1895&lt;br /&gt;
|one who falsely predicts disaster, especially for silly reasons: &amp;quot;global alarmists&amp;quot; are the Chicken Littles of our time&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In characteristically [[liberal]] style, the online Merriam-Webster spins the [[global warming]] example usage by saying the data showed he wasn't a Chicken Little.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chinese wall&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|a beneficial, impregnable wall that safeguards against wrongdoing&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christmas card&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|another conservative innovation that apparently did not exist earlier, even though mail did; cards that say &amp;quot;Seasons Greetings&amp;quot; are a cheap imitation now.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christmas tree&lt;br /&gt;
|1835&lt;br /&gt;
|the immensely popular custom of using an evergreen tree to support ornaments, cards and gifts, and symbolize life impervious to the darkness and cold of winter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chump change&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|a term that highlights the insignificance of an amount of money; used especially against a miser or someone who makes the mistake of thinking money is more important than [[Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|churchgoer&lt;br /&gt;
|1687&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who makes an effort, during the 168 hours in a week, to attend a church service&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|circle the wagons&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|regroup with family and friends, when under attack. usage from settlers in the old US west.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|citizen's arrest&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|private enforcement of the law without the need of a taxpayer-funded police officer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|civil defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|civilians protecting themselves and their community against attack or natural disasters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1799&lt;br /&gt;
|pretentious, verbose, and often liberal nonsense; example usage: &amp;quot;the professor wasted the rest of the class on his [[liberal claptrap]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class act&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|exemplify conservative principles with values, integrity and a work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class warfare&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|this concept was initially coined by [[Karl Marx]] in ''[[The Communist Manifesto]]'', but it has become so discredited that it is now used mostly by conservatives to point out liberal demagoguery&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|closed shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|a business that requires membership in a union as a condition of working there; 22 conservative states prohibit this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|clueless&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|hopelessly ignorant about something important, as liberals often are&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Coase theorem|Coasean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient result or bargain based on market forces without the distortions caused by [[transaction costs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cogent&lt;br /&gt;
|1659&lt;br /&gt;
|compelling with the powerful force of reason, the opposite of [[liberal]] claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cold turkey&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|defeating an addiction by completely turning away from it, often by using power of the [[Bible]] and [[Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Columbian&lt;br /&gt;
|1757&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to Christopher Columbus ''or the United States''	&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|Cold War&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[George Orwell]] shortly after he wrote ''Animal Farm'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldwar2history.info/war/causes/Cold-War.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recognition that communist nations were at war with American freedom even in the absence of actual military conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|collectivism&lt;br /&gt;
|1880&lt;br /&gt;
|when decision-making by a group takes priority over the good ideas of an individual, often preventing progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|commie&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|abbreviation for &amp;quot;communist&amp;quot; that captures their simple-minded totalitarianism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|common sense&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|sound judgment based on facts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|competitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Con Con&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] to highlight the deception and risks inherent in proposed national constitutional conventions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conniption&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria or alarm, as in &amp;quot;having a conniption fit&amp;quot;; a typical response by [[liberals]] when confronted with their [[double standards]] and illogical positions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conservation of charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|overall charge does not change in an isolated system; it is neither created nor destroyed; the concept was first suggested by [[Benjamin Franklin]] but the date of origin for this term is surprisingly recent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who adheres to principles of limited government, personal responsibility and moral values&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=conservative&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative field]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s?&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of physical force over a region such that items moving throughout the region can store energy ''without loss'', as in the planetary system and electrical products&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The mathematical definition of a conservative field -- which arises in [[multivariable calculus]] -- is that a scalar potential exists for the function and, alternatively, it is [[irrotational]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[consumer surplus]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First coined by Cambridge University Professor Alfred Marshall in his acclaimed text, ''Principles of Economics'' (1890).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the extra benefit received by consumers above the price they paid for a good or service, illustrating the value of the [[free market]]; specifically, consumer surplus is the difference between what consumers would have paid for something, and the lower price they did pay.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constant&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) something unchanging in value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constitutionality&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|its date of origin is the year of the [[Constitutional Convention]] that proposed the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|contrarian&lt;br /&gt;
|1657&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates views contrary to that of others; this type of person frustates [[liberal]] attempts to gain control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cooking the data&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Charles Babbage]] used it in his book, &amp;quot;Reflections on the Decline of Science in England.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scientus.org/Church-Science-History.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copacetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1890s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster officially lists its date of origin as 1919 and its source as unknown, but that is well after when Robinson says he developed it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, tap dancer extraordinaire, claimed the invention of this word; it was first popularized by African Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cop-out&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|taking the easy way out, usually by shirking one's responsibilities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copyright&lt;br /&gt;
|1735&lt;br /&gt;
|extending private property to protect expressive works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|corporate socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency of large corporations to act in a socialistic manner, at the expense of meritocracy and productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|correlate&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|(verb) to show that one thing relates to another, such as [[atheism]] or [[homosexuality]] and selfishness or lack of charity; [[liberal]]s falsely rely on anecdotes to deny the general relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[countability (Mathematics)|countability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1874&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Georg Cantor]], loathed by the leading contemporary [[mathematicians]], developed this in proving that the real numbers are ''uncountable''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterexample&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|an example that is contrary to the proposition. A common point in logical, reasoned debate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterfactual&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|especially assumptions that are contrary to fact; Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] wrote for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], &amp;quot;petitioners' standing does not require precise proof of what the Board's policies might have been in that counterfactual world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd.'', 130 S. Ct. 3138, 3163 (2010) (5-4 decision).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterproductive&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with a worthy goal.  Example usage: &amp;quot;nearly everything a liberal supports is counterproductive.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counter-reformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|a movement in response to another movement, as in a counter-reformation to the [[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cover-up&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|concealment by government officials of the truth about a matter of public concern&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crackpot&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|crazy talk, lunacy, a person on the fringe of reality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creation science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined by the anti-[[evolution|evolutionist]] [[Henry Morris]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801716.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|creativity&lt;br /&gt;
|1875&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability, unique to God and his likeness, to make something from nothing&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cross-examination&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|the most effective tool against [[liberal]] [[deceit]], better than even the requirement of an oath&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crystal clear&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals are the opposite&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[culture war]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after the book ''Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America'' by James Davison Hunter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cyberbullying&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of obnoxious and hurtful liberal behavior on the internet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deadweight loss]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Confirmation of the first use is desired.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the loss in overall wealth and efficiency imposed by monopolies and taxation, due to the loss in extra value that someone would have received beyond what he would have paid for a good at a free market price&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death panel&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a provision of [[Obamacare]] that will enable a panel of government bureaucrats to decide who receives medical treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death tax&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|interestingly, the term was coined by Canadians opposed to the high estate tax on their assets held in the United States; Frank Luntz is credited with later popularizing this term in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Dr. Frank Luntz, ''Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|debunk&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from &amp;quot;bunkum&amp;quot; (nonsense), a term that originated in 1845 when a congressman defended his silly speech by saying his audience was Buncombe County, NC&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decentralization&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|the dispersion of power, as in a shift from national to local control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decrypt&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|military code-breaking, which played an instrumental role in World War II in deciphering enemy codes that many felt were unbreakable; illustrates the &amp;quot;can do&amp;quot; approach of conservatism in a patriotic way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[defeatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative attitude that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defensive driving&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of driving a car that always focuses on avoiding accidents, even those potentially caused by others; nearly a half-century later, dictionaries still do not recognize this term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deflation&lt;br /&gt;
|1891&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in the value of savings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defund&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|refers especially to termination of government funding of a wasteful or hurtful program&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberative assembly&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised'' (19th Ed. 2000), xxv.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Edmund Burke in describing the British parliament during a speech to voters in Bristol; he meant a body of persons meeting to discuss and decide common action under parliamentary law&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|demagogue&lt;br /&gt;
|1648&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deregulation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Reagan won in 1980 by campaigning on this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|design by committee&lt;br /&gt;
|before 1958&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative term directed against collective production by a group &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|despotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|a ruler with unlimited powers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deterrence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|Disincentive of committing a crime based on the amount of punishment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devalue&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|describing an unwelcome attitude or act, as in &amp;quot;devaluing human life&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devil's advocate&lt;br /&gt;
|1760&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who espouses the position of the wrong side, in order to test, sharpen and strengthen the right side&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devotee&lt;br /&gt;
|1645&lt;br /&gt;
|ardent follower, supporter, or loyalty to. 56 years separates devotee and devoted&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|disinformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|false information spread (and sometimes manufactured) by groups with a strong political agenda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|division of labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing productivity through specialization of labor, as in a husband working in manufacturing while his wife cares for children&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dog and pony show&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an overblown event, typically having more fanfare than substance; liberals like to run a &amp;quot;dog and pony show&amp;quot; in towns having a large public university, where students brainwashed by liberal professors are led like cattle to the events&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|domino effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|how the fall of one nation to communism can result in its harmful spread to neighboring nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|double standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|applying harsher criticism against one group, such as churchgoers or conservatives, than against another group, such as atheists or liberals; recognition of a double standard by the [[Prodigal Son]] led him to repent and convert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doublethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a term first coined by [[George Orwell]] in his dystopian novel ''[[1984]]''; it means simultaneously holding contradictory beliefs, which is a characteristic of [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doubting Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who believes only what he can see and touch, and doubts all else&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|drifter&lt;br /&gt;
|1897&lt;br /&gt;
|someone whose residency wanders about aimlessly, failing to become a permanent, productive member of any community&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|duh science&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|First coined by the ''LA Weekly'' to criticize the ''[[LA Times]]'' for failing to criticize a publicly funded study that concluded that pessimistic people are often in bad moods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Originally &amp;quot;duh!&amp;quot; science: &amp;quot;But couldn't we have been treated to just a soupcon of critical thinking, some irony even -- perhaps a glancing reference to the wisdom of public funding for 'duh!' science?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;L.A. TIMES WHO KNEW? DEPARTMENT&amp;quot;, ''LA Weekly'' p. 12 (Jan. 14, 2000).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumb down&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumpster diving&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|Searching through dumpsters for food or other material that can used rather than discarded; first known use: &amp;quot;Restaurant and store owners have complained about drunks panhandling during the day and 'dumpster diving' through trash at night.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phil Long, &amp;quot;Special Wing for Drunks Suggested at Future Jail,&amp;quot; Miami Herald D1 (Nov. 24, 1982).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|duplicitous&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|someone -- particularly a liberal politician -- who deceptively says one thing when he really intends to do something else&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eagle Scout&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest rank in the [[Boy Scouts]], the term also means &amp;quot;a straight-arrow and self-reliant man.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|earmark&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;A provision in congressional legislation that allocates a specified amount of money for a specific project, program or organization.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster's Dictionary (2009).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|economic rent&lt;br /&gt;
|1889&lt;br /&gt;
|revenue above the minimum amount to keep a good or service on the market, typically due to monopoly power; notice the date of origin was only one year prior to passage of the conservative [[Sherman Act]] in 1990&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|editorialize&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;to introduce opinion into the reporting of facts&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|educrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|a liberal education bureaucrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[efficiency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1633&lt;br /&gt;
|ultimately from the Latin ''efficientem'', meaning ''&amp;quot;working out, or accomplishing&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=efficient Online Etymological Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|egotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1714&lt;br /&gt;
|the root of atheism, as explained by Paul in Romans 1:21-22; the root of depression and anxiety also&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|electioneering&lt;br /&gt;
|1780s&lt;br /&gt;
|to work for the success of a particular candidate, party, ticket, etc., in an election. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elementary proof]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|a mathematical proof based on the minimum assumptions associated with real analysis; term probably does not predate [[complex analysis]] and its first use may have been the English mathematician James Joseph Sylvester's paper, &amp;quot;On an elementary proof and generalisation of Sir Isaac Newton's hitherto undenionstrated rule for the discovery of imaginary roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/circular129johnuoft/circular129johnuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[embryoscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first endoscopic image of the unborn child was in 1967, by Mandelbaum.  The date of origin of the term &amp;quot;embryoscopy&amp;quot; may have been later, but likely before the 1990s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Search this term on the internet and see the spectacular photos of the unborn child (&amp;quot;embryo&amp;quot;) that were &amp;quot;scoped&amp;quot; by tiny cameras.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|empowerment&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating power for the ordinary; see also [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entitlement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|entrepreneur&lt;br /&gt;
|1852&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ethnic voting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|widely recognized and even advocated by some,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/5/2/3/4/p152345_index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet the dictionary doesn't yet recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|etiquette&lt;br /&gt;
|1740&lt;br /&gt;
|social standards of behavior that promote dignity and discourage inept communications (or lack thereof)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurabia&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|A satirical word based on the idea that Europe is rapidly becoming Islamized.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eurosceptic&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who opposes joining the super-socialist [[European Union]]; some prefer the term &amp;quot;Eurorealist&amp;quot; to express this opposition, and sometimes &amp;quot;Eurosceptic&amp;quot; is used to criticize opponents of the EU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|everyman&lt;br /&gt;
|1906&lt;br /&gt;
|the typical person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exceptional&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|same year of origin as the [[U.S. Constitution]]!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exculpatory&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|often used in the phrase &amp;quot;exculpatory evidence,&amp;quot; it took nearly 50 years to develop this term after origination of the legal term suggesting guilt: &amp;quot;incriminate&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|existence proof&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|overcoming denial that something is possible by referencing its existence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expatriate&lt;br /&gt;
|1768&lt;br /&gt;
|to give up one's own citizenship, or be banished by one's own nation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|explain away&lt;br /&gt;
|1704&lt;br /&gt;
|a weaker form of [[liberal denial]], &amp;quot;explain away&amp;quot; the truth is the only way that some remain liberal as they grow older&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expose&lt;br /&gt;
|1803&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) a statement of the facts, typically to discredit wrongdoing by government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|facade&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1845 is the date of origin for the figurative use.  The literal use dates back to 1650s, meaning the front of a building.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Example usage: &amp;quot;The facade of a liberal politician is often conservative.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fair shake&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|approaching an idea or concept with an open mind&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fairy tale&lt;br /&gt;
|1749&lt;br /&gt;
|a fanciful fictional story - sample usage: &amp;quot;[[Evolution]] is a fairy tale for adults who don't want to read and accept the logic of the [[Bible]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faith healing&lt;br /&gt;
|1885&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[falsifiability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|first emphasized by Karl Popper in 1934, this helps define science:  if a proposition is false, then it can be shown to be false.  If not, then the proposition is not scientific.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1916&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after a speech by Vice President [[Dan Quayle]], 1992 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fat farm&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a place where obese people -- such as self-centered [[atheists]] -- might go to try to lose weight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|father figure&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who fulfills the essential role of a father&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faux conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First coined by ''The Economist'', in &amp;quot;[[New England]]'s governors; All change&amp;quot; (September 22, 1990), in reference to [[Lowell Weicker]]'s &amp;quot;loss in 1988 to a Faux-conservative Democrat, Mr [[Joseph Lieberman]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|federal government&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|used by [[Alexander Hamilton]] in the first phrase of the ''[[Federalist Papers]]'' to signify a government that is not fully sovereign, as the States are&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[federalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|the unique system of dual sovereigns, state and federal (national), established by the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fear-mongering&lt;br /&gt;
|1938&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The ''[[New York Times]]'' attributed the first use -- ironically -- to President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|stir up exaggerated fear by the public, typically to expand government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|feedback&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|an all-important element of accountability and improvement, and a key consideration in good engineering design&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fellow traveller]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|may have existed earlier, but popularized in 1924 by Leon Trotsky. Describes a sympathizer of a cause but who does not formally belong to the cause, such as a [[communist]] sympathizer who is not part of the communist party. The term was invented by the communists in its original, non-negative sense, but the conservatives were the first to use it as a pejorative term. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fiscal cliff]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined by Federal Reserve Chairman [[Ben Bernanke]], it refers to the effect on the economy of a sharp drop in spending and perhaps an increase in taxes scheduled to take effect at approximately the same time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.benjaminfedwards.com/blog/?p=197&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Flip flop (politics)|flip-flop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|''verb'', meaning to change political position, typically due to [[liberal]] pressure.  First used by the Republican S.I. Hayakawa campaign to describe California Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator John Tunney, whom Hayakawa defeated in an upset.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|force-feed&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|what liberals do to students in [[public schools]] today in training them to be [[atheist]]ic socialists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|forward-looking&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|planning for the future rather than dwelling on the past&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Founding Fathers&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|the several dozen [[Christian]] men &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html Religious Affiliation of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, Adherents.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who helped draft the formative documents of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[free enterprise]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free lunch&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|something acquired ostensibly without paying for it, as in welfare; often used to remind people that &amp;quot;there's no such thing as a free lunch&amp;quot; in order to point out that it must cost someone something, now or later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free market&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free speech&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|shorthand for &amp;quot;freedom of speech,&amp;quot; but with a connotation that extends to non-citizens and listeners; first used in a U.S. Supreme Court opinion in dissent in the [[Slaughter-House Cases]] by Justice Bradley&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free world&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|areas of the world free of communism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|freeloader&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who avoids paying or working for his share of a benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|frontiersmen&lt;br /&gt;
|1814&lt;br /&gt;
|living and working in a self-sufficient manner and with courage in a new land.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fuzzy math&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|non-computational math designed to obscure the differences between the correct answers and the incorrect -- but perhaps politically motivated -- answers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|galvanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|as in, &amp;quot;the liberal proposals ''galvanized'' the grassroots in opposition&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gambit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a sacrifice that obtains an advantageous position, as in the game of [[chess]] ([[Bobby Fischer]]'s queen's gambit was a masterpiece) or in real life (the [[Passion of Christ]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gang up&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|group pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gateway drug&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|abuse of alcohol/marijuana eventually leads to harder drugs cocaine/heroin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gerrymandering&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a newspaper editor to criticize the manipulation of the lines of a new district into a salamander shape&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allbusiness.com/information/publishing-industries/251259-1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that favored election of a liberal politician&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Giving Tuesday&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|a day of charity during the [[Christmas]] season, in response to &amp;quot;Black Friday&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Cyber Monday&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gimmick&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant a deceptive mechanical device for controlling a [[gambling]] machine, and then its meaning expanded to include all trickery to attract attention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|globalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|Merriam-Webster states it was first used in 1943&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the OED gives a date of 1965 for the exact term &amp;quot;globalism&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50095613/50095613se2?single=1&amp;amp;query_type=word&amp;amp;queryword=globalism&amp;amp;first=1&amp;amp;max_to_show=10&amp;amp;hilite=50095613se2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the term &amp;quot;globalization&amp;quot; was first used in the mid-1980s in a different, complimentary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God-fearing&lt;br /&gt;
|1835 &lt;br /&gt;
|Living by the rules of God; living in a way that is considered morally right.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|godsend&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|go-getter&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gold standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest standard; in currency, when money could be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|golden parachute&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for a pre-arranged handout to a corporate executive when fired, as when the company is taken over by new ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|good book&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|the [[Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Good Samaritan&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|how genuine charity is the best approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|goon&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a dim-witted thug, espec. one who intimidates on behalf of a union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|government school&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[economist]] [[Milton Friedman]] as a more accurate name for [[public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grade inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency by Liberal educationalists and public schools to increase marks, irrespective of merit or actual achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grassroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gravy train&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|easy money for little or no work, in contrast with the work ethic; notice how the [[Great Depression]] hit two years later&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|greasy spoon&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|a free enterprise term for a small, cheap restaurant - which in many places is just what the public wants; reflects Jesus' [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] about the digestive system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Great Awakening&lt;br /&gt;
|1730-1740&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian spiritualism recurs periodically.  See [[Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gresham's law&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency in a free market for bad money (which loses its value) to drive out (be used more often in transactions) than good money (which retains its value), because people want to horde the good money while getting rid of the bad money; a similar effect can be seen when profanity drives out intelligent discussion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|groupthink&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of thought consisting of conformity to a manufactured consensus and self-deception; coined by William H. Whyte in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|half-baked&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|an idea that can appear reasonable at first, but with just a little thought it is recognized to be absurd&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hallmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|purity, authentic, official seal, distinguishing feature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|handout&lt;br /&gt;
|1882&lt;br /&gt;
|describes charity and government giveaways&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|happy talk&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|sensless banter among broadcasters in the [[lamestream media]], as a substitute for real news; more generally, happy talk is unjustifiably feel-good rhetoric that implicitly denies the real existence of [[Hell]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hardworking&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|harmless error&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|an insignificant violation of a duty or procedural rule; first used in ''Western Ins. Co. v. The Goody Friends'', 29 F. Cas. 764 (S.D. Ohio 1861) (referring to a duty)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hatchet job&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|still looking for the context of its first use; today it means an article, typically by a liberal, that misleadingly smears someone, typically a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hawthorne effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|the increase in achievement resulting merely from being observed; this was demonstrated by experiment at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric in Cicero, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heartland&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|the central portion of the United States known for its [[conservative]] values and lack of control by the [[liberal media]] and [[Hollywood]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heckler's veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by University of Chicago Law Professor Harvey Kalven, Jr., a strong supporter of free speech in politics, this term has been used in [[Supreme Court]] decisions by Justices [[Sam Alito]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' ''Pleasant Grove City v. Summum'', 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009); ''see also'' ''Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J., Inc. v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist.'', 386 F.3d 514 (3rd Cir. 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Antonin Scalia]], and [[Clarence Thomas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch.'', 533 U.S. 98 (2001)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|high maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The use of the term was picked up and repeated in a movie released in 1989, ''When Harry Met Sally'' (1989).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
|someone, often liberal, who repeatedly demands attention and unproductive help from others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hindsight&lt;br /&gt;
|1866&lt;br /&gt;
|understanding of an event or decision with the benefit of wisdom gained afterward&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hippie&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who rejects traditional morality and does what he wants, often growing long hair and smoking [[marijuana]] rather than working hard; this term became increasingly pejorative over time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hissy fit&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an unjustified tantrum, typically female in nature, as in &amp;quot;[[feminist]]s had a hissy fit when [[Lawrence Summers]] suggested (but criticized) the possibility that women have weaker scientific aptitude than men, and Summers ultimately resigned.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hoax&lt;br /&gt;
|1796&lt;br /&gt;
|to deceive the public into believing something that is false, often to pull people away from the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hobson's choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;this term has the entertaining history of originating with an English liveryman who required customers to &amp;quot;choose&amp;quot; the horse closest to the door.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an ostensible choice that disguises a lack of freedom, because each alternative is completely unacceptable.  This term is invoked to criticize an illusory freedom of choice.  This term has been used in 48 cases by Supreme Court Justices, more often by conservatives than by liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hokey&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|phony, in an obvious or corny way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Holy Week&lt;br /&gt;
|1710&lt;br /&gt;
|the week leading up to [[Easter]], including the [[Passion]], [[Crucifixion]] and [[Resurrection]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|honor system&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to discipline that emphasizes and encourages trust, honesty and personal responsibility rather than constant supervision&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homeschool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;the OED assigns a date of origin of 1850 to &amp;quot;homeschool&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homemaker]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|a wife and mother whose efforts are wisely spent running the household for the family&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hometown&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|the place where someone grew up and typically obtained some benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|used to promote the agenda in the book ''After the Ball'', but then used to criticize the movement by Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] in his dissent in''Lawrence v. Texas'' (2003)''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|human rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1766&lt;br /&gt;
|rights of all peoples, such as to &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; as set forth in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hype&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant to deceive or &amp;quot;put on,&amp;quot; and then its meaning shifted slightly to represent extravagant promotion of something as the liberal media often do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hyphenated American&lt;br /&gt;
|1889&lt;br /&gt;
|President Theodore Roosevelt said in 1915, &amp;quot;There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hypothesis&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a suggestion, typically scientific in nature, which must be tested and proven before asserted as truth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|1801&lt;br /&gt;
|From the Latin ''hystericus'', from Greek ''hystera '' meaning ''&amp;quot;womb&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hysteria Meriam Webster Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an old notion that hysteria was caused by the [[womb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|idealist&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a person guided by ideals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|illiteracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the [[public schools]] are illiterate today&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inalienable&lt;br /&gt;
|1640s&lt;br /&gt;
|cannot be taken away, especially by government, as in &amp;quot;inalienable rights&amp;quot; in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inattentive&lt;br /&gt;
|1741&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Date of origin given by the Online Etymology Dictionary; Merriam-Webster cites an earlier date of origin, perhaps with a narrower meaning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|more than 150 years before the discovery in physics of the connection between attentiveness/observation and uncertainty/chaos, this conservative word cautioned against inattentiveness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incentivize&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|create a reward to encourage good work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incidental inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|inequalities that result as side effects of an objectively just system &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incoherent&lt;br /&gt;
|1626&lt;br /&gt;
|the term often applies to liberal [[double standard]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incompleteness&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|a system of logic or mathematics that includes propositions that are impossible to prove or disprove; term coined as a result of [[Kurt Godel]]'s work in 1931&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incrementalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|imposing bad political or social change slowly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|independence&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|free will&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|individualism&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|values, rights and duties arise from the individual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inerrancy&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|free from error, as in &amp;quot;biblical inerrancy&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inflationary&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|policies causing inflation of the monetary supply&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|informed consent&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|consent to surgery is meaningful only if informed, a requirement that should apply to abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|initiative&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|self-starting first step toward improvement, overcoming a tendency of complacent underachievement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inoculate&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|to safeguard against future harm by developing immunity against it.  Sample usage: &amp;quot;Conservapedia inoculates against [[liberal claptrap]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|insightful&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|what conservatism is about: gaining insights into the truth, and bettering individuals and society with them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inside baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/19/magazine/on-language-inside-baseball.html (popularized in the 1970s, but a date of origin earlier in the 1900s is likely)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|strategy and tactics known to the well-informed participants, but mysterious to most observers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intangible&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|something valuable that cannot be seen or touched, such as goodwill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intellectual property&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;we [should] protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears.&amp;quot;  ''Davoll v. Brown'', 7 F. Cas. 197 (Cir. Ct. Mass. 1845) (Woodbury, federal judge).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intelligent design&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A few isolated references to this phrase, without its full current significance, can be found dating back to the mid-1800s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|coined in ''Darwin on Trial'', a book by Philip Johnson, who is considered the father of the intelligent design movement and who co-founded the [[Discovery Institute]]'s Center for Science and Culture in 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://biologos.org/resources/johnson-phillip-e&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|interventionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;governmental interference in economic affairs at home or in political affairs of another country&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|invisible hand&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Adam Smith in the ''Wealth of Nations'' and widely used today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[invisible hand of marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|discovered on Conservapedia, it is the unseen force of productivity that results from marriage (only between a man and woman).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Iron curtain&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri just after World War II, to describe the communist's figurative wall against freedom&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[irreducible complexity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|coined&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alan Turing]] reportedly used the term for a completely different meaning that went nowhere. [http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/nasty-feelings-in-the-ool-community-toward-yockey/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and later adopted  and developed by [[Michael Behe]] to describe structure or system that could not possibly have evolved, because removing any part makes it nonfunctional, thereby showing that [[God]] must have created it whole into biology; if the [[Nobel Prize]] were not dominated by [[atheism]], Behe could win one for this insight.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Islamofascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1990?&lt;br /&gt;
|A form of totalitarian Muslim fundamentalist rule, or extreme Islamism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ivory tower&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a description of the pampered culture of liberal [[professor values|professors]], and how far out of touch with the truth it is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[John Hancock]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|a personal signature, especially in a bold style that stands up for principles as John Hancock did with his signing the Declaration of Independence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in an article in ''Fortune'' magazine by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/278089&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and repeatedly used in U.S. Supreme Court opinions since 1967,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States v. Wade'', &lt;br /&gt;
388 U.S. 218 (1967).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet as of 2009 [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary still fails to recognize this widely used term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial prejudice&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|the bias of a judge in favor of a political correct identity group intended to rig outcome equality in favor of that group based on subjective bias rather than objective justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial restraint&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Assuming that this court has power to act, it does not necessarily follow that it should act. ... In a number of situations, and in a number of cases, it has been held that courts should voluntarily refrain from using or asserting power. Where the use or assertion of power might be destructive of a well defined purpose of law or of a declared public policy such voluntarily imposed '''judicial restraint''' may be commendable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179, 184-85 (D.D.C. 1942) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial supremacist&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|one who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A similar yet different concept, &amp;quot;judicial supremacy,&amp;quot; was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial taking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|the deprivation of private property due to a court decision; this concept was introduced by conservative Justice [[Potter Stewart]] in 1967, and the term was used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in the same month (!) in December 1982, and then used often in law review articles and Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then four Justices of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] endorsed the principle in a decision in 2010, with two others accepting the possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[junk science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rated.com/dir/Society/Issues/Environment/Opposing_Views/Junk_Science&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the corruption of the scientific method to advance other, often political, goals (such as [[Global Warming]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jury nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|the power of a jury to overrule the law and acquit an ostensibly guilty defendant; the power was established in the colonies in 1735 in the trial of [[John Peter Zenger]], but this term was first used in state court by Pfeuffer v. Haas, 55 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932) and in federal court by ''Skidmore v. Baltimore &amp;amp; O. R. Co.'', 167 F.2d 54 (2nd Cir. 1948)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|killjoy&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|one who spoils the pleasure of others. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/killjoy Killjoy 1776 Mer-Web]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Example''-Vandals seek to disrupt conservative wikis, an education project. They are a killjoy to the learning process.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kiss of death&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|from Judas's betrayal of Jesus with a kiss, Mark 14:44-4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kleptocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1819&lt;br /&gt;
|A politician who seeks status and personal gain at the expense of the governed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kowtow&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|obsequious, unthinking obedience to someone or something, used especially in the context of dictatorships and liberal belief systems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kremlinology&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the otherwise indecipherable behavior of the government of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]. Refers to the Kremlin, the traditional seat of Russian government (Soviet or not). &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kudos&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|praise for real achievement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|la-la land&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First known use was in an article by Tom Zito, &amp;quot;Mr. Mike's Mania; Sick Humor, Very Well Indulged,&amp;quot; [[Washington Post]] F1 (Nov. 8, 1979): &amp;quot;But now, it's off to La-La land, and his movie deal. 'The thing about Southern Californians,' he says, 'is this: They wake up and say, 'Gee, what a wonderful morning. I think I'll make a salad.' And that takes them the whole day. ...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term for the decadent, liberal culture of [[Hollywood]]-driven [[Los Angeles]], originally capitalized as &amp;quot;La-La land.&amp;quot;; Merriam-Webster is in denial about this etymology and claims a later origin of 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|labor camp&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|forced work prison&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|laissez-faire&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond what is minimally necessary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lame duck&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|one falling being in achievement, especially a public official whose power is limited because his term in office is set to expire without possibility of reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lamestream media&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Bernie Goldberg to describe the clueless [[Mainstream media]] that repeat superficial, discredited liberal claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|landslide&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|In the political sense, an overwhelming election victory. A clear, democratic expression of popular will.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leadership&lt;br /&gt;
|1821&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability and willingness to lead, often by example&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|learning curve&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|initial, extra time and effort that is typically necessary before someone becomes productive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Left Coast]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1990s&lt;br /&gt;
|a more descriptive term for the West Coast of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leftism&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|principles and doctrine of leftists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|level-headed&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;balanced&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;having common sense and sound judgment&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[liberal creep]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal bias that gradually creeps or distorts an entry, definition, explanation, description, or historical account.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|life vest&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-life invention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lifelong&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|something, usually a commitment, that lasts a lifetime, as in &amp;quot;a lifelong commitment to [[Christ]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|limousine liberal&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a multi-millionaire who pretends to be compassionate about the poor, but supports liberal policies that increase burdens on working Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|litmus test&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|use of a single political issue to determine if a candidate or nominee is acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|local&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This date refers to its first usage as a ''noun'', which is an estimate of its adoption as a concept.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|common usage: &amp;quot;all politics is local&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lockstep&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|mindless conformity, often to liberal values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|locomotive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a great engine of economic growth during the [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lone wolf&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who prefers to work, act, or live alone,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lone%20wolf Lone wolf, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; synonymous with self-sufficiency&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|loose cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|an undisciplined person or program that dangerously lacks forethought; used in mid-November 1976 to describe $11 billion in unspent appropriations by the Ford Administration:  &amp;quot;'That money,' says Arnold Packer, a senior Senate Budget Committee economist who is helping Carter draw up his shadow budget, 'is like a loose cannon rolling around the deck' because a sudden reappearance of the funds could be inflationary.&amp;quot; (''BusinessWeek'')&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lowest common denominator&lt;br /&gt;
|1854&lt;br /&gt;
|the lowest in work ethic, morals, or knowledge among a group; typically used to criticize the liberal practice of dumbing down content&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lunatic fringe&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by U.S. President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to describe members of eccentric, radical or extremist groups&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lunatic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|machismo&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|a word never used favorably by feminists!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Main Street&lt;br /&gt;
|1743&lt;br /&gt;
|the many small towns in America, and their conservative values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstay&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|the primary support, typically for something good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|a clergyman&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man-hater&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, &amp;quot;Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946.  The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|make-work&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[market failure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[Coined as the title of a scholarly article by Francis M. Bator, &amp;quot;The Anatomy of Market Failure,&amp;quot; ''The Quarterly Journal of Economics'' (1958) [http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/Courses/econ335/out/bator_qje.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|instances where the free market does not provide a desirable result, as when information is withheld from an unsuspecting consumer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manifest destiny&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|Providential design over future events, which originated in the context of expanding the United States to the Pacific Ocean&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Mardi Gras]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1699&lt;br /&gt;
|The annual celebration on the eve of [[Ash Wednesday]] and [[Lent]], particularly in the historically [[Catholic]] city of [[New Orleans]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|marriage redefinition&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|descriptive term used to criticize the legalizing of same-sex marriage in [[Canada]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the view of life that physical matter is all that exists; as an &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot;, the term criticizes such view&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|meat and potatoes&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|the most interesting or fundamental part&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Medal of Honor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|a special American honor for bravery on the battlefield&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[media bullying]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Media_bullying&amp;amp;oldid=430831 (Apr. 14, 2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined by ''Conservapedia'', media bullying is aggressive bias by the media in the attempt to influence a politician or others, typically toward a [[liberal]] goal&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|melting pot&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|requires &amp;quot;social and cultural assimilation&amp;quot; for successful immigration&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster dictionary (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[meritocracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|a system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievement &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[microeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the economics of the individual person or business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|micromanage&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|insistence on controlling details, typically by liberals to [[censorship|censor]] progress; [[Ronald Reagan]] was critical of this style by [[Democrat]] Presidents&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mind control&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for how an atheistic government influences what people believe, especially through public education&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|close-minded point-of-view, typically in adherence to a liberal falsehood and often to the exclusion of Christ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missile defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as part of [[SDI]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1625&lt;br /&gt;
|someone sent on a mission, typically a religious mission&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|mobocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1754&lt;br /&gt;
|rule by a mob, as at Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|monogamy&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|this has the same date of origin as &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot;, and that may not be a coincidence!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moonlighting&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|working more than a full-time job in order to be as productive as possible; the [[work ethic]] at its best&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Jerry Falwell to describe the movement of growing moral, Christian conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|motivation&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe the word did not exist before 1873?!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckety–muck&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for an arrogant person who holds a title or position considered to be important by others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckraker&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who searches out and publicly exposes [[deceit]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/muckraker Merriam-Webster - Muckraker]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Murphy's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|if something can go wrong, then it will go wrong: this was a conservative insight by an engineer Edward Murphy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muscle car&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|placing a powerful engine in a classic two-door car for highly efficient performance; also celebrate masculine style against erosion by feminism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|myopic&lt;br /&gt;
|1990s&lt;br /&gt;
|originally a term in optometry (1752), 1990's used to describe liberals' lack of foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|name-dropping&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|a term critical of the [[liberal]] practice of seeking to impress others by casually mentioning personal association with prominent people, despite its lack of relevance to the conversation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nanny state&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;nanny state&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span id&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Under the New Economic Policy, [the new French Prime Minister Raymond] Barre has made it clear that industrial lame ducks can no longer count on the generosity of Nanny i.e. the state - for bailing out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leo Ryan, &amp;quot;Economy Shored up: France's new surge of liberalism,&amp;quot; The Globe and Mail (Canada) (Aug. 1, 1978)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Note how two powerful new conservative terms led to a third here!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|negativism&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|mental attitude that tends that is skeptical about almost everything, except one's own views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|political or media expressions using circumlocution and euphemisms to disguise or distract from the truth; first coined by [[George Orwell]] in ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|noel&lt;br /&gt;
|1811&lt;br /&gt;
|a Christmas carol or, when capitalized, Christmas itself&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-justiciable&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Used by the state attorneys for West Virginia (including Philip Steptoe, founder of Steptoe &amp;amp; Johnson) in ''Pennsylvania v. West Virginia'', 262 U.S. 553 (1923):  &amp;quot;It is not the 'subject of judicial cognizance,' Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15; Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S 1, 15; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, or 'susceptible of judicial solution.' Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 18, 22; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, 234.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a difficult issue that the courts should not attempt to resolve, often because it is too political in nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-locality&lt;br /&gt;
|1920s&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action at a distance]] at the atomic level; even though proven, it is still opposed by those who believe in [[relativity]] and still not recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nonstarter&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|an idea -- typically a [[liberal]] one -- that has no possibility of being productive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|null set&lt;br /&gt;
|1906&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.leidenuniv.nl/fsw/verduin/stathist/1stword.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Example usage: &amp;quot;the contribution of [[Leftism]] to progress is the null set.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|assertion of authority by a State against encroachment by the federal government, in defense of liberty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|obstructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1879&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberate interference with free speech or legislative progress, as when liberal legislators (the &amp;quot;fleebaggers&amp;quot;) fled Wisconsin to try to block a reform&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Old Glory&lt;br /&gt;
|1862&lt;br /&gt;
|the ''United States of America'' flag, Stars &amp;amp; Stripes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-size-fits-all&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Was there an earlier conservative use?  Frank Zappa's album cover in the 1970s does not count!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lee Wishing, director of communications for conservative [[Grove City College]], in criticism of how the government administers student loans: &amp;quot;Unfortunately, with government programs, it's one size fits all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/dec96/er-dec96.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The 2008 Republican platform states, &amp;quot;We reject a one-size-fits-all approach and support parental options, including home schooling, and local innovations such as schools or classes for boys only or for girls only and alternative and innovative school schedules.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-trick pony&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or group that relies repeatedly on the same gimmick, as in &amp;quot;the media are a one-trick pony in their criticism of [[Rand Paul]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|open-minded&lt;br /&gt;
|1828&lt;br /&gt;
|see [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[opportunity cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|optimism&lt;br /&gt;
|1759&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ordered pair&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s&lt;br /&gt;
|developed by the [[Christian]] [[Georg Cantor]], this [[conservative]] concept was part of the [[set theory]] that he invented and revolutionized mathematics with, despite opposition by the establishment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|organic food&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|a grassroots conservative response, led by mom-and-pop consumers and pharmacies, against government-approved pesticides and mandatory fluoridation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|taken from original intent, The belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the way the authors originally intended it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originality&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberals]] not only lack originality, but (like Justice [[Hugo Black]]) are often hostile to its possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Orwellian&lt;br /&gt;
|1960s&lt;br /&gt;
|terminology or style that advances the power of big government but is hurtful or nonsensical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=604&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ostensibly&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|having an outward appearance that may not reflect the underlying truth; good potential use is Luke 3:23 in describing Jesus as the son of Joseph&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|outflank&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|to move swiftly around an opponent, a military tactic mastered by [[conservative]] [[General]] [[George Patton]] to crush the [[Germans]] in [[World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pack heat&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|carry a concealed firearm, allowed by permit in nearly every state, yet liberal bias has made dictionaries slow to recognize this term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parenting&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|children raising&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Parkinson's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how bureaucracies expand regardless of the productivity, and how inefficient work expands to fill the time available for its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parochial school&lt;br /&gt;
|1755&lt;br /&gt;
|a donation-supported, religious alternative to the mistake of [[public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Parthian shot]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative term for the tactic of expressing a criticism while one exits, just as the ancient Parthians would shoot arrows while retreating in battle.  This tactic is common among those who reject [[conservative]] truths, as seen when left-leaning editors leave ''Conservapedia''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[patent troll]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|a company that obtains or buys up patents for the sole purpose of asserting infringement claims, and without any intention of actually manufacturing the invention; the term was first coined by Peter Detkin, in-house counsel to Intel&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|patriotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlovian&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a conditioned, automatic and unthinking response to a signal; it has been used twice by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justices. &amp;quot;It is well established that this Court does not, or at least should not, respond in Pavlovian fashion to confessions of error by the [[Solicitor General]].&amp;quot;  ''De Marco v. United States'', 415 U.S. 449, 451 (1974) ([[Rehnquist]], J., dissenting); &amp;quot;'[[Incorporation doctrine|Incorporation]]' has become so Pavlovian that my Brother BLACK barely mentions the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] in the course of an 11-page opinion dealing with the procedural rule the State of [[Florida]] has adopted for cases tried in Florida courts under Florida's criminal laws.&amp;quot; '' Williams v. Fla.'', 399 U.S. 78, 144 (1970) ([[Potter Stewart|Stewart]], J., dissenting and concurring).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative&lt;br /&gt;
|1882&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that has negative connotations in describing something, which the [[liberal media]] use while pretending that the term is neutral, such as &amp;quot;nativism&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;isolationism&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perestroika&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing economic freedom and free speech under [[communism]], which led to the unraveling of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perpetual war&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined by historian Charles A. Beard,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles A. Beard is best known for interpreting the Constitution as being primarily motivated by economic interests.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it has been used most recently by [[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[personhood]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/personhood Personhood] Dictionary.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|Inherent rights guaranteed to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development, including the pre-born, partially born. Also, the state or fact of being a person.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philadelphia&lt;br /&gt;
|1682&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[William Penn]] and meaning &amp;quot;city of brotherly love,&amp;quot; the concept captures the &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[phonics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1684&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives have long championed phonics to promote literacy, Bible-reading, and informed voters; liberals take the opposite position&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|phony&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This surprisingly recent origin appears to be derived from a British confidence game.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|needed to address [[liberal deceit]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[photo bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A letter to the editor by a reader of the [[liberal]] ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' observed, &amp;quot;This is the third time in recent weeks that a weird or disfigured picture of Mr. Quayle has appeared in your Sunday paper.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a common trick of the [[liberal media]] to push the reader to the political left on an issue, as in displaying a man without teeth as an opponent of a liberal bill or candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pie in the sky]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|an unrealistic claim of value about a future [[materialism|materialistic]] benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|piece of cake&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|Sample usage: with church and the [[Bible]], life can be a piece of cake, but without [[Christ]] it can be very difficult&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|plasticity&lt;br /&gt;
|1783&lt;br /&gt;
|having a plastic quality that conforms to molding or pressure; in pejorative usage, someone who easily conforms to [[peer pressure]] or [[liberal]] falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|poetic justice&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&lt;br /&gt;
|when virtue is rewarded and/or wrongdoing is punished in an indirect or unexpected way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|political machine&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for local and typically Democratic power structures that prevent outsiders from winning elections; first used by George Washington Plunkitt to criticize the Tammany Hall machine for which he served&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|This term originated among radicals at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] to enforce radical orthodoxy, but immediately flipped in usage to become a term of mockery of radicals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For an early different usage of the word, see 1793 J. WILSON in U.S. Rep. (U.S. Supreme Court) 2 (1798) 462 Sentiments and expressions of this inaccurate kind prevail in our..language... ‘The United States’, instead of the ‘People of the United States’, is the toast given. This is not politically correct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term may have come from Chairman Mao in 1936.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politicize&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|seeking political gain at the expense of truth or quality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Merriam-Webster definition (1994 ed.) is incomplete and unclear: &amp;quot;to give a political tone or character to&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politics of envy&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Australian [[conservative]] Christopher Pine to describe the philosophy behind taking money from private schools and giving it to public ones.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pork barrel&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|government as a source of handouts that redistribute money from hard-working people to those who avoid work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[post-abortive]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|the unexpected trauma and physical harm -- which can worsen over time -- that is experienced by a woman after having an [[abortion]]; coined by Dr. Kaye Cash in an editorial describing what she learned during a 365-mile walk in southeast Arkansas to speak with the public about abortion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Editorial by Kaye Cash, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, AR), October 23, 1986.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|potential&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Usage here refers to &amp;quot;promise&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;possibility&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pothead&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who smokes marijuana and doesn't realize how it destroys people&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|powerhouse&lt;br /&gt;
|1881&lt;br /&gt;
|source of energy and strength - which is what the conservative movement is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[price discrimination]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|charging different prices for the exact same service or good; first coined by the British economist (and critic of [[John Maynard Keynes]]) Arthur Cecil Pigou in ''The Economics of Welfare''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[price fixing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|the setting of prices in interference of the [[free market]]; it is illegal for private companies to do this, but government itself sometimes does it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|prioritize&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|to recognize that some goals and activities are more important than others, and then focus accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|private sector&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|non-governmental businesses and jobs functioning in free enterprise&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|privatize&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|to return a business or enterprise from state to private control; to de-nationalize.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Procrustean&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative description of the one-size-fits-all mentality, which disregards individual differences&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productive&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|the gap of about 200 years between the creation of &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;productivity&amp;quot; is astounding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-life]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|property right&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|provocateur&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who spends more time causing unproductive conflicts rather than advancing knowledge, accomplishing legitimate goals, or helping anyone&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pseudoscience&lt;br /&gt;
|1844&lt;br /&gt;
|worthless claims written with the appearance of scientific rigor to gain an aura of credibility&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|publicity stunt&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Earlier usage in the 1900s may have occurred, but the term &amp;quot;stunt&amp;quot; was not coined until 1878.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Used on April 10, 1969 by Republican Senators who withdrew from a tour and probe by Senator [[Ted Kennedy]], criticizing him for his &amp;quot;publicity stunt&amp;quot; in preparation for his expected run for the presidency; the [[Chappaquiddick incident]] sunk his chances three months later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|punctual&lt;br /&gt;
|1675&lt;br /&gt;
|consistently showing up on time, rather than a disrespectful tardiness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|quantify&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|race card&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is the date of its widespread familiarity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Playing the race card&amp;quot; consists of relying on racial emotions or charges of racism in order to overcome the truth and logic in politics, legal proceedings, or otherwise; this term became familiar in the criticism of the defense and acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reasonable doubt&lt;br /&gt;
|1770&lt;br /&gt;
|a Christian concept for the benefit of the souls of jurors, not the accused; first used in English by [[John Adams]] (before that, in [[canon law]]) in addressing the jury during his defense of the Boston Massacre perpetrators:  &amp;quot;Where you are doubtful never act: that is, if you doubt of the  prisoner's guilt, never declare him guilty; that is always the rule, especially in cases of life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;amp;context=fss_papers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rapture&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual ecstasy[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rapture]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[recidivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1886&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency for people lacking in [[faith]] and determination to revert to prior patterns of harmful behavior, such as repeat criminal offenders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|recuse&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|self-removal by a decision-maker (especially a judge) because of possible bias with respect to the pending issue&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|red tape&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive bureaucracy and procedural complexity which frustrate meaningful activity and progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|refudiate&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|combination of ''refute'' and ''repudiate'', as coined by [[Sarah Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|the view that ethical truths are not absolute, but depend on the person or group that holds them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[responsibility]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1737&lt;br /&gt;
|HAMILTON Federalist No. 63 (1988) II. 193 Responsibility in order to be reasonable must be limited to objects within the power of the responsible party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1700&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Date of origin given by the 10th Edition of the ''Merriam-Webster'' dictionary; its online dictionary has an earlier date.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|to reconsider, a sign of [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse discrimination&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the use of quotas or affirmative action to use race or gender to discriminate against a better qualified person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revisionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term, now obscure, refers to a Marxist movement that preferred evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|distortions of history to promote liberal bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revolving-door&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|the liberal practice of repeatedly transferring into and out of government in a way that impedes progress and access by others, like the same people going round-and-round in a real revolving door&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|right-of-way&lt;br /&gt;
|1768&lt;br /&gt;
|a right to pass through, other rights notwithstanding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[RINO Backer]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|a more important term than &amp;quot;RINO&amp;quot;, because what matters most is whether someone will stand up for a [[conservative]] position and candidate when the [[liberal media]] demand that everyone flock to the liberal side.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|riot act&lt;br /&gt;
|1715&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its colloquial use, as in &amp;quot;read them the riot act,&amp;quot; began in 1819.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the Riot Act was a law passed in England in 1715 to authorize officials to disperse riots&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rogue state&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|(Originally used in 1993 then reintroduced in 2002.) A 'rogue state' displays no regard for international law. It attempts to acquire weapons of mass destruction and other military technology with which to threaten neighbouring countries and support terrorism. Rogue states often reject human values and brutalize their own people.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rubber-stamp&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|unthinking repetition or endorsement of something, despite having the responsibility to make an independent decision, as in &amp;quot;Democrats rubber-stamp demands by the abortion industry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|running start&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|taking initiative earlier than required, in order to achieve more&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|run of the mill&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning &amp;quot;merely average, commonplace,&amp;quot; the term is critical of a failure to strive for excellence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sacred cow&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or idea, typically liberal, that becomes immune from criticism because of its political usefulness rather than its truthfulness, as in the theories of [[evolution]] and [[relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scam&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|a deceptive scheme, which is what most liberal theories are.  Interestingly, the origin of the term &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot; is unknown, but its timing near the beginning of the 1960s is telling.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scapegoating&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|a term criticizing how people, particularly liberals, deflect accountability and blame from themselves to others; inspired by Leviticus 16:8.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|salutary neglect&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by the [[conservative]] [[Edmund Burke]] in his 1775 speech to the British [[House of Commons]] entitled &amp;quot;On Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|school choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Milton Friedman in his book, ''Free to Choose'' &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[scientific fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scofflaw&lt;br /&gt;
|1924&lt;br /&gt;
|a word invented by the [[best of the public]] as part of contest to describe people who are contemptuous of laws and repeatedly violate them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scrutinize&lt;br /&gt;
|1671&lt;br /&gt;
|its original meaning was to examine votes, and thus prevent [[liberal]] attempts at voter fraud&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[secularism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-55&lt;br /&gt;
|attempts to educate, particularly through [[public school]], without including [[faith]] or even acknowledgment of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Segway&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|Dean Kamen's trademark spelling of &amp;quot;segue&amp;quot; for use of Yankee Ingenuity to improve efficiency, to refer to a form of battery-powered transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[self-defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1651&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-destruct&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|often the tragic result of liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Discipline|self-discipline]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|1614&lt;br /&gt;
|preservation of oneself from destruction or harm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-reliant&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|separation of powers&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the fundamental insight underlying the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|shotgun marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|pregnancy =&amp;gt; get married.  Think of someone besides yourself for a change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|show trial&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|trials, especially in communist countries, which have preordained outcomes but are used for propaganda purposes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sidewalk counseling&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice of volunteers exercising their right of [[free speech]] to advise women against [[abortion]] as they walk on sidewalks toward abortion clinics; liberals have passed laws to restrict and [[censorship|censor]] this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|silent majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by President [[Richard Nixon]] in his speech to the nation on Nov. 3, 1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://watergate.info/nixon/silent-majority-speech-1969.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|silver lining&lt;br /&gt;
|1871&lt;br /&gt;
|a benefit that is not obvious to see, particularly amid a disappointment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|skullduggery&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|underhanded or unscrupulous behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|slippery slope&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|term has been widely used for decades to expose the fallacy of &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|small town values&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|term was first used by [[Democrat]] [[John Glenn]] in his failed presidential run in 1984, in a futile effort to appear more conservative than [[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|something intended to disguise or draw attention away from an often embarrassing or unpleasant issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/smoke%20and%20mirrors Smoke and Mirrors, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Widely used during the 1990s to describe [[Bill Clinton]]'s political strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke-filled room&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term describing how a few political insiders sometimes pick a candidate or make a decision in a secret room (in the old days, filled with cigar smoke)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoking gun&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|a law-and-order term, &amp;quot;smoking gun&amp;quot; was first used as figurative term in a reported judicial decision in ''Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.'', 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12775 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 1975), and many literal uses of the term in court decisions before that!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|staging for a typically liberal, unproductive rant having little substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soccer mom&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|a mother who devotes herself to her children's activities; this is a significant voting bloc or demographic group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social engineering&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|an increasingly pejorative term for liberal attempts to create a &amp;quot;nanny state&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates government control over the economy, and particularly state control of the means of production&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social justice rhetoric&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|language and rhetorical ploys equating equality of outcome with justice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sophomoric&lt;br /&gt;
|1813&lt;br /&gt;
|pretending to know much, when in fact the person knows little and is even immature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soul-searching&lt;br /&gt;
|1924&lt;br /&gt;
|personal reflection about one's own values and morality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sour grapes&lt;br /&gt;
|1760&lt;br /&gt;
|disparagement of something by someone who failed to attain it, rather than admitting his own faults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spend-and-tax&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a variation on &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; (see below), &amp;quot;spend-and-tax&amp;quot; consists of spending the money first and then trying to justify raising taxes based on the deficit created by the spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spin doctor&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|someone ensuring that others interpret an event from a particular point of view.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/world/asia/22policy.html?_r=2 General Petraeus describes Axelrod by Bob Woodward]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spot-on&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|precisely correct, as in a prediction or in overcoming imprecision in a challenging task; its origin is from the military &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|squirrelly&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|like a squirrel; jumpy and unpredictable; as in liberals get squirrelly when confronted with facts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|squish&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who pretends to be conservative when it is popular, but then caves into [[liberals]] as soon as they start to criticize him&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[stagflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|inflation ''and'' high [[unemployment]] ''and'' stagnant demand by consumers, typically due to [[liberal]] policies as in the late 1970s under President [[Jimmy Carter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stalking horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1788&lt;br /&gt;
|a candidate or issue that serves to increase the chances that ''another'' will win, as in &amp;quot;antifederalists attempted to win elections by using 'the stalking horse of amendments.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Centinel'', 1788 (quoted in ''The Federalist party in Massachusetts to the year 1800'', By Anson Ely Morse).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[statism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|advocates for centralized government and government ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Statue of Liberty]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|a phrase used to describe it more than a decade after its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|status quo&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|a useful baseline for assessing and promoting conservative growth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stay-at-home&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|typically usage is &amp;quot;stay-at-home mom,&amp;quot; the mainstay of successful, productive family life&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stem-winder&lt;br /&gt;
|1875&lt;br /&gt;
|first-rate of its kind, especially a political speech; term inspired by the innovation for the watch to be wound by stem rather than by a key&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straightforward&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|something liberals are not&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straw man&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|an imaginary argument or example set up for the purpose of easily knocking down, while distracting from valid arguments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strategy&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|a careful plan or method, the opposite of liberal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|street-smart&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|the non-bookish intelligence necessary to survive and thrive in an unstructured, rough-and-tumble environment analogous to a tough neighborhood in a big city&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Stupaked&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|hurt by someone who reassured everyone he would do the right thing, but then switched at the last minute to do the opposite (refers especially to [[abortion betrayal]]s)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Columnist Kathleen Parker is credited with first coining this term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[subsidiarity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|the concept (opposed by liberals) that responsibilities performed by local or subordinate organizations should not be usurped by centralized government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sugarcoat&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Abraham Lincoln]] to say that secession is a sugarcoated word for rebellion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|supply-side&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|the economic theory that reducing taxes expands economic activity by encouraging greater earnings and investments; proven successful during the Reagan Administration in the 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|survivalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|one who is determined and prepared to stay alive, and even thrive, if liberals cause a breakdown of society&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|take-charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1954&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive leadership for the greater good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takeover&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|as in the takeover of government by the communist revolution in that year&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takings&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Marion &amp;amp; R. V. R. Co. v. United States'', 270 U.S. 280, 285 (1926) (the Supreme Court referring for the first time to &amp;quot;takings by eminent domain&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|use of the power of [[eminent domain]] by government to convert private property to a public use, typically disfavored by the property owner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tax-and-spend&lt;br /&gt;
|1937 &lt;br /&gt;
|not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster, it is included in dictionary.com and it means the liberal policy of raising taxes and increasing government spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|taxpayer&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|the word highlights who is really paying for things&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tea party&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|an amorphous group of ordinary citizens unified against a more expensive government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Tebowing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|bending on one knee in public to give glory to God (named after [[pro-life]] [[NFL]] [[QB]] [[Tim Tebow]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|teetotaler&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who does not drink any alcohol, and thereby avoids supporting the alcoholic industry&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[term limits]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe this is not in the dictionary yet? Merriam-Webster omits it, but dictionary.com has it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/term+limit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|terrorism&lt;br /&gt;
|1795&lt;br /&gt;
|this was during the French Revolution&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[textualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|first used by Justice [[Robert Jackson]] in his influential concurrence in ''[[Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer]]'', 343 U.S. 579 (1952), it now describes the legal philosophy of Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Thanksgiving Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1674&lt;br /&gt;
|a tradition older than the [[United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[think tank]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in [[Britain]] to describe intelligence organizations that helped the military, think tanks became part of the rise of conservatism in the 1970s and 1980s; is ''Conservapedia'' the think tank of the future?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|time-tested&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach that has proven to be beneficial over time, like heterosexual marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|top-notch&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest quality, which requires respect for merit to recognize&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tort reform&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://faculty.lls.edu/workshops/documents/nockleby.pdf (citing the late 1960s and 1970s for the beginning of the movement)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a movement placing sensible limits on runaway liberal lawsuits&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|term which identifies the similarities of fascist and communist regimes and ideologies and urges resistance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tour de force&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|a feat of skill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trademark&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|extends the concept of private property to the marks used by business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition...the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traditionalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transaction cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|Economist [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] for this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transistor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|named by John R. Pierce and developed at the [[conservative]] [[Bell Labs]], this invention epitomized Yankee ingenuity; Pierce was a critic of claims of [[artificial intelligence]] and was the future developer of [[Telstar]], a precursor to the [[Strategic Defense Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|transparency&lt;br /&gt;
|1615&lt;br /&gt;
|allowing people who are affected by decisions to see how and why those decisions are really being made.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tree huggers&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|still not recognized by the dictionary, this term criticizes extreme environmentalists, but they proudly use the term also to describe what they literally do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trivia&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|insignificant detail, which can sometimes obscure what is important and distract people from the Bible; liberal [[Wikipedia]] is filled with trivial junk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trojan horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1837&lt;br /&gt;
|describes a type of liberal [[deceit]]:  subversion from within&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trust but verify&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as the approach to use towards communist [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|typewriter&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by a homeschooled American, used to better spread conservative ideas&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ugly duckling&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|an unpromising appearance but often with great unseen potential&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ultra vires&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|beyond the authority, especially of a government or corporate official&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|un-American&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|contrary to American values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unborn child&lt;br /&gt;
|1791&lt;br /&gt;
|the rights of the unborn child have been recognized in English law since the 1600s, but the specific term &amp;quot;unborn child&amp;quot; itself may have been first used by an attorney arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court in ''Den v. Sparks'', 1 N.J.L. 67 (Sup. Ct. 1791)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|uncertainty principle&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|an underlying chaos (uncertainty) at the atomic level in the physical world after the [[Fall of man]], which renders a [[perpetual motion machine]] and life beyond 120 years impossible&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underachiever&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a typically liberal person who fails to accomplish what he could&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underdog&lt;br /&gt;
|1859&lt;br /&gt;
|[[David]] v. [[Goliath]], [[Cinderella]], [[best of the public]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[underemployed]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1908&lt;br /&gt;
|having less than full-time or suitable employment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underwater basket weaving&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|A pejorative that describes worthless college courses and a declining educational system; see [[Worst College Majors]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unscripted&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|speaking sincerely without parroting a script; &amp;quot;[[Rand Paul]] and [[Chris Christie]] are effective because, unlike [[Obama]], they are unscripted.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unsung hero&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who accomplishes good without receiving recognition for it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|useful idiot&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=135140 Attributed originally to Lenin], but since used by others like [[Nobel Prize]] winner (Literature) Doris Lessing to describe how she was manipulated by the [[communists]]: “I was taken around and shown things as a ‘useful idiot’... that’s what my role was. I can’t understand why I was so gullible.” [http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2010/07/100624_doc_useful_idiots_lenin.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Sample usage:  &amp;quot;There are not as many useful idiots on college campuses for the Obama reelection campaign in 2012 as there were in 2008, and it's doubtful he can fill a stadium rally unless the campaign pays students to attend.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vacuous&lt;br /&gt;
|1850s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This word as a prior date of origin for its physical meaning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|lacking any insight or depth of thought - common among [[liberal claptrap]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vandalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|malicious destruction of someone else's property&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vaporware&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|a new computer program that is not really available as hyped in the media; see also the parable of the two sons at Matthew 21:28-32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|venture capital&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|capitalism at its best: funding new and risky enterprises to create wealth for many&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veracity&lt;br /&gt;
|1623&lt;br /&gt;
|devotion to truthfulness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vet&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2199254/?from=rss&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a verb meaning to screen for flaws&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|a power by one branch of government to restrain another branch, and thereby attain less government overall&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[victimization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|volunteer&lt;br /&gt;
|1618&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who freely offers to help&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wannabe&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that criticizes liberal [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|War on Terror&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|no listing at Merriam-Webster; on February 2, 2009 (less than two weeks after inauguration), Obama dropped use of this term. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=17455 Obama administration drops 'war on terror' phrase] Pew Forum, February 2, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|washed-up&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|no longer productive, as in &amp;quot;the washed-up liberal professor has not contributed anything to his field in 30 years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|waterloo&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|a final defeat or setback, coined merely one year after the [[English]] defeated [[Napoleon]] at the [[Battle of Waterloo]]; there has never been a &amp;quot;waterloo&amp;quot; for [[Christianity]] or [[conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|welfare queen&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|a disparaging term for someone who collects excessive welfare payments through fraud, manipulation, or laziness. First used by [[Ronald Reagan]] during his 1976 Presidential campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|welfare state&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|a government that views its primary responsibility to be to give handouts to individuals to make sure they have what they need&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wildcatter&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-energy term that describes someone who drills for oil in fields not known to have oil&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wishy-washy&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;An archaic meaning of poor quality dates to 1690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|easily changing in opinion, usually due to peer pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|woman's intuition&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Notice how this predates the modern [[feminists]], who would tend to consider this term [[politically incorrect]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a perception more common in women that something or someone is to be avoided without yet understanding why.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|word poverty&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2001/lang_gap_moats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President [[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work (physical sense)&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a physical measure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Work equals force times distance.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of effort used to increase energy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|a habit of working as a moral good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|workaholic&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a Southern Baptist pastor to describe the work habits of himself and other ministers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/02/magazine/the-lives-they-lived-on-language-wordplayers.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|worldview&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|a comprehensive way of looking at life and the world; sometimes used to criticize a liberal's irrational belief system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee&lt;br /&gt;
|1758   &lt;br /&gt;
|Inhabitants of New England, United States. Dutch slang in 1698- Americanized 50 years later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee Ingenuity&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|America's inhabitants had a knack for clever design and capitalist success. The early Americans had applied their exceptional skills prior to the terms existence, see [[Eli Whitney]] and [[Benjamin   Franklin]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|yellow journalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice, started by newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and his rival William Randolph Hearst, of sensationalizing and biasing newspaper headlines and articles in order to influence public opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|zero-sum&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|activities or political approaches in which a gain can only be achieved at a corresponding loss to someone else.  For example, Facebook revenue is &amp;quot;zero-sum&amp;quot; because it results from users wasting their time (or ruining their marriages); reading or translating the [[Bible]] is not zero-sum.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[ziggurat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1877&lt;br /&gt;
|predicted by [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] in the story of the [[Tower of Babel]], the existence of the ziggurats were unknown to the Western world throughout most of history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ Merriam-Webster dictionary]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/ Dictionary.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Conservapedia's Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Surprising Dates of Origin for Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Linguistic Analysis of Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Secularized Language‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Downgraded Conservative Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Terms Difficult to Classify]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservapedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Best of Conservapedia]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JBauer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible&amp;diff=1099748</id>
		<title>Bible</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible&amp;diff=1099748"/>
		<updated>2014-08-14T04:12:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JBauer: Added.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:800px-Crop Book of Isaiah 2006-06-06.jpg|thumb|300px|right|The Holy Bible, opened to the Book of Isaiah.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bible}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Bible''' is a collection of the most logical books and letters ever written.  It includes the most beautiful book ever written, the [[Gospel of Luke]], and the most profound book ever written, the [[Gospel of John]].  [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] anticipated or guided nearly every great human achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shorter than you might think, the Bible consists of two parts: 27 short books and letters of the [[New Testament]] of the [[Christian]] [[faith]], and 39 books recognized by both Christianity and Judaism, known as the [[Old Testament]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christianity adds a few additional books to the Jewish [[Old Testament]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The New Testament was originally written in [[Greek]] and the Old Testament in [[Hebrew]]; both have been translated into more than 2000 languages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible is the biggest-selling book in history, a testament to its timeless and compelling message.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Bible continues to be the best-selling book ever. Americans alone buy 25 million Bibles a year, according to Publisher's Weekly. Bible sales are now reaching $609 million a year, with specialty Bibles available for myriad &amp;quot;niche&amp;quot; audiences, from motorcycle riders to campers, brides and archaeologists. &amp;quot;Immerse,&amp;quot; a water-resistant Bible for troops overseas, is now available from publisher Bardin &amp;amp; Marsee. [http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070529-111815-7952r.htm Polls: Most believe Bible as God's word] - Jennifer Harper, ''The Washington Times'' - May 30, 2007] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, the Bible has had an immense positive influence on literature, culture, and history.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus Christ]] himself may have written the perfect [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] in the New Testament, as no other plausible author has been suggested.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most [[Christians]], Protestant and Catholic, agree on the 27 books of the [[New Testament]], but the Protestant Bible includes only 39 books in the [[Old Testament]] while the Catholic Bible includes an extra 7 books, for a total of 73.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Catholic Bible includes these books that are not included in the Protestant Bible:  &lt;br /&gt;
# The Wisdom of Solomon&lt;br /&gt;
# Tobit&lt;br /&gt;
# Sirach&lt;br /&gt;
# Judith&lt;br /&gt;
# 1st Maccabees&lt;br /&gt;
# 2nd Maccabees&lt;br /&gt;
# Baruch [http://www.catholicbible101.com/theholybible.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Protestant Bible has 593,493 words in the Old Testament and 181,253 words in the New Testament.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christiananswers.net/bible/about.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Name==&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; had its origins in an ancient [[Phoenicia]]n seaport called [[Byblos]], which was so-named as a result of the trade and manufacture of writing material based on the [[papyrus]] or byblos reed, used extensively in antiquity for making [[scroll]]s and [[book]]s.  The [[Greek language|Greek]] word ''biblos'' was based upon this, and it came to be the word for ''book'' (a small book was termed ''biblion''), and by the 2nd century A.D. Greek [[Christianity|Christians]] had called the Scriptures ''ta Biblia'' ('''τα βιβλία''' ''the books''), which was transferred to [[Latin]] by dropping the ''ta''; the word made its way to [[Old French]] where the plural was dropped in favor of the singular, hence becoming the [[English]] word ''Bible''. (Unger, pg 143; Moulton; Blass)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Books of the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
===The Old Testament===&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;360&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin-left:5px&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: tan  no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Old Testament layout&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Jewish&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Genesis&lt;br /&gt;
|Genesis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Exodus&lt;br /&gt;
|Exodus&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Leviticus&lt;br /&gt;
|Leviticus&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Numbers&lt;br /&gt;
|Numbers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Deuteronomy&lt;br /&gt;
|Deuteronomy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joshua&lt;br /&gt;
|Joshua&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|Judges&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kings&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Isaiah&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezekiel&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Kings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The Minor Prophets&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Kings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Psalms&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Chronicles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Proverbs&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Chronicles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Job&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezra&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Song of Songs&lt;br /&gt;
|Nehemiah&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruth&lt;br /&gt;
|Esther&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lamentations&lt;br /&gt;
|Job&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ecclesiastes&lt;br /&gt;
|Psalms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ester&lt;br /&gt;
|Proverbs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|Ecclesiastes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezra&lt;br /&gt;
|Song of Solomon&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chronicles&lt;br /&gt;
|Isaiah&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Lamentations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezekiel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|The Minor Prophets&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: tan no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Dates of each Book&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Old Testament&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|New Testament&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Genesis, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Matthew, A.D. 60-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Exodus, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Mark, A.D. 60-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Leviticus, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Luke, A.D. 58-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Numbers, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|John, A.D. 95&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Deuteronomy, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Acts, A.D. 58-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joshua, 1400-1360 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Romans, A.D. 58&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Judges, c. 1020 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Corinthians, A.D. 57&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruth, c. 1090 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Corinthians, A.D. 57&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|Galatians, A.D. 56&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|Ephesians, A.D. 62-63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Kings, 609-600 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Philippians, A.D. 58-60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Kings, 609-600 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Colosians, A.D. 61-63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Chronicles, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Thessalonians, A.D. 52&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Chronicles, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Thessalonians, A.D. 53&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezra, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Timothy, A.D. 62-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nehemiah, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Timothy, A.D. 65-66&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Esther, 464-425 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Titus, A.D. 65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Job, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Philemon, A.D. 65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Psalms, 1004-965 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;
|Hebrews, A.D. 63-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Proverbs, 965-925 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|James, A.D. 63-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eccleisiastes, 965-925 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Peter, A.D. 64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Song of Solomon, 965-925 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Peter, A.D. 65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Isaiah, 785-697 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st John, A.D. 90-100&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah, 587-538 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd John, A.D. 90-100&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lamentations, 587-538 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|3rd John, A.D. 90-100&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezekiel, 592-572 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Jude, c. A.D. 70-75&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel, 539-520 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Revelation, A.D. 96-98&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hosea, 753-731 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joel, 835-796 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Amos, 787-747 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Obadiah, 848-841 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonah, 771-754 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Micah, 715-687 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nahum, 661-612 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Habbakuk, 625-608 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Zephaniah, 621-608 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Haggai, 520 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Zechariah, 520 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Malachi, 455 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Old Testament]], also called the Hebrew Bible or Tanakh, consists of thirty-nine books. The books themselves were originally written in [[Hebrew]], and later on in the [[Aramaic]] language of Palestine; the Greek language version written after the conquest of [[Alexander the Great]] is known as the [[Septuagint]].  [[Melito]], a bishop of [[Sardis]] in [[Lydia]] (in what is now [[Turkey]]), is said to have coined the phrase ''Old Testament'' about A.D. 170.  The Old Testament is divided in three parts (hence, &amp;quot;Tanakh&amp;quot;) within the Jewish community: the [[Torah]] (&amp;quot;Law&amp;quot;), or [[Pentateuch]], the five books of [[Moses]]; [[Nevi'im]] (&amp;quot;Prophets&amp;quot;), and [[Ketuvim]] (&amp;quot;Writings,” or [[Hagiographa]]). Here the arrangement of the books differs somewhat from the Old Testament as used by Christians, however the actual writing of each book remains the same. The Christian order of the the books of the Bible follow the Chronology of the events and the personages being related, while in the Jewish order, though there is a chronological framework, the order follows more the importance, influence, &amp;quot;weight of usage&amp;quot; within Judaism. Thus, for orthodox Judaism, The Torah of Moses (the 5 books of Moses) come first, and are the most authoritative of all Scripture. Under the Pharasaic theory that the Moses was given the Oral law explicating how the written law was to be applied, at the same time as he was given the written law contained in the Bible, and that oral law passed on through the generations, the Mishna and the Gemara composing the Talmud is equally authoritative with the Torah of Moses. Then the Prophets come next in authority. But the Prophets are broader than considered by the Christian ordering. The Prophets do include what Christians call the Former and the Latter, or the Major and the Minor prophets, but it also includes what Christinns consider History - such as the books of the Kings. The last in authority for every day life of the Jew in terms of &amp;quot;regulation&amp;quot;, actually form  a great influence in the Synagogue worship - the Writings, with a heavy emphasis on the Psalms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Torah====&lt;br /&gt;
The Five books of Moses, in their Hebrew and English names:&lt;br /&gt;
*Bereisheet (&amp;quot;in the beginning&amp;quot;), or [[Genesis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Shemot (“names”), or [[Exodus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Vayikra (“and God called”), or [[Leviticus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Bemidbar (“in the Wilderness”), or [[Numbers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Devarim (“words”), or [[Deuteronomy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first eleven chapters of ''Genesis'' provide the account of the [[Creation]], the history of God's early relationship with humanity, and the [[Deluge]] of [[Noah]]. The remaining thirty-nine chapters detail the account of God's covenant with the early Hebrew nation, led by the patriarchs [[Abraham]], [[Isaac]] and [[Jacob]] (or Israel), and one of Jacob's children, [[Joseph]]. It tells the beginnings of God's chosen people, of how God commanded Abraham to leave his family and home to settle in the land of [[Canaan]], and how the Children of Israel later moved to Egypt.  The remainder of the Torah, beginning with ''Exodus'', tells the story of the great Hebrew leader [[Moses]], and of the Hebrews through their sojourn and slavery in Egypt, their escape from bondage, and their wanderings in the desert until they finally enter the Promised Land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nevi'im====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Nevi'im]] (&amp;quot;Prophets&amp;quot;) is the story of the rise toward, and ultimately reaching, the Hebrew monarchy; the sad period of anarchy and revolt leading to the division into the two kingdoms of Judah and Israel; and the prophets who judged the kings of both in God's name. It ends with the conquest of both kingdoms and the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. The Minor Prophets are considered a single book in the Nevi'um; in Christianity they have been split into twelve separate books and named for their authors.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joshua (Biblical book)|Joshua]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Judges (Biblical book)|Judges]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[I Samuel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[II Samuel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[I Kings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[II Kings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Isaiah (Biblical book)|Isaiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jeremiah (Biblical book)|Jeremiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ezekiel (Biblical book)|Ezekiel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Minor Prophets]] &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Hosea (Biblical book)|Hosea]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joel (Biblical book)|Joel]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Amos (Biblical book)|Amos]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Obadiah (Biblical book)|Obadiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jonah (Biblical book)|Jonah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Micah (Biblical book)|Micah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nahum (Biblical book)|Nahum]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Habakkuk (Biblical book)|Habakkuk]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zephaniah (Biblical book)|Zephaniah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Haggai (Biblical book)|Haggai]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zechariah (Biblical book)|Zechariah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Malachi (Biblical book)|Malachi]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Ketuvim====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ketuvim]], or &amp;quot;Writings,&amp;quot; contain lyrical poetry, philosophical reflections on life, and the writings of the prophets and other Jewish leaders during the exile in [[Babylon]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Psalms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Proverbs]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Book of Job]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Song of Songs]], also called [[Song of Solomon]] in the Christian Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Book of Ruth]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lamentations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ecclesiastes]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel (Biblical book)|Daniel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ezra]], divided into the two books of Ezra and [[Nehemiah]] in the Christian Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Books of Chronicles]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[David]] has been named as the author of the ''Psalms''; [[Solomon]] is believed to have written ''Song of Songs'' in his youth, the ''Proverbs'' in his prime, and ''Ecclesiastes'' during his old age.  The prophet [[Jeremiah]] is thought to have written the aptly-named ''Lamentations'' at the beginning of the exile in Babylon. The ''Book of Ruth'' is the only biblical book that centers entirely on a non-Jew, a [[Moabite]] who married a Jew and became an ancestor of both David and [[Jesus Christ]]. ''Esther'' is unique as it is the only book in the Bible not to mention God.  [[Moses]] is considered to be the author of ''Job''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The melodies of the Old Testament===&lt;br /&gt;
The Hebrew of the present day Old Testament is composed of the Hebrew consonents and, added on at a later stage, the vowels. Along with these two elements, other signs were added which indicated the melodies that were sung along with the words or phrases. Some of the signs were positioned above the individual consonents, some below, and some to the side. Some of these melody signs were associated with others providing a musical pattern that corresponds with the opening of a thought, similar to the beginning of a sentence (ex. &amp;quot;merkha&amp;quot;), the continuation of a thought (ex. &amp;quot;munakh&amp;quot;), tying in one word with the following, as one melody flowed into the next, the &amp;quot;resting&amp;quot; or completion of a thought, much in &amp;quot;the same way that a comma (ex. &amp;quot;azla&amp;quot;), though not ending a sentence, makes for the &amp;quot;semi&amp;quot;-ending or minor completion of a thought, a major break in the run of thoughts (&amp;quot;etnachta&amp;quot;), though  the run of thought would be resumed until the major completion (&amp;quot;sof pasuq&amp;quot;), much in the same way the a period brings to a stop and a completion as a sentence ends. Thus the musical signs in the Hebrew text also provide an interpretion of the text current to the times in which the signs were incorporated as part of the text. The signs that tie one word to another providing one thought are called &amp;quot;conjunctive&amp;quot; signs and the signs that separate words and the thought of them are called &amp;quot;disjuctive&amp;quot;. An example of the use of these signs to interprete the Hebrew text is the well known prophesy of the One to come. The Hebrew letters can either be understood to read &amp;quot;His name shall be called Wonderful counsellor of the mighty God&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;His name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God.&amp;quot; The melody signs (called in Hebrew &amp;quot;Ta'mei HaMikra) decide for the latter. After &amp;quot;Wonderful&amp;quot; there is a disjuctive, after &amp;quot;Counsellor&amp;quot; there is a disjuctive, and after &amp;quot;Mighty&amp;quot; (but adj. after the noun in Hebrew order) there is a conjunctive. It is possible to reconstruct to some extent the melody and the interpretation of the Old Testament current in the first century and therefore the melody and the interpretation of Jesus Himself. This is because of the following: the present day melodies of the various dispersions of the Jews are to a great extent different one from the other. Some of these dispersions are the Ashkenazi, representing the Jews exiled from Israel by the Romans in 70 A.D. and then on to the Rhine Valley,and then onto parts of Eastern Europe, Western Europe, America, etc. the Sephardim who saw the beginnings of their disperion from Spain in the 15th Century and then on to Greece, Turkey, North Aftrica. Holland, and America, the Yemenites, the Bnei Israel of India, the Jews of Ethiopia, etc. etc, Yet, with the diversity in melodies of the Scriptures, there are certain features which are either identical or strikingly similar. Musicologist, Joel Segal, pointed out over 40 years ago, that that could only have been possible if these dispersions were at one time together in the same place. The only time that all these dispersions were together in the same place was prior to the great dispersion of the first century and the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Old Testament Apocrypha===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Apocrypha]] was written during the four hundred years between the last book of the Old Testament and the birth of Christ.  The term itself comes from the Greek word ''apokruphos'' (&amp;quot;hidden&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;concealed&amp;quot;), and although they have an actual history and literary value, the fourteen books which make up the Apocrypha have been rejected as canonical by both the Jewish faith and most denominations of the Christian church due to historical, geographical, or literal inaccuracies; the teaching of doctrines which contradict inspired Scripture; and a lack of elements and structure which give genuine Scripture its unique characteristic (Unger, pg. 70). The Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches, among others, include the Apocrypha in their versions of the Bible, considering them to be canonical.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Apocryphal books had been used in both Israel and Egypt and are part of the Old Testament in the Greek language used by Jews all over the Greek speaking world - particularly Alexandria, Egypt. This version is called the Septuaginta. The Septuaginta fell into disuse among Jews for two reasons - 1. Greek speaking Christians were using the Septuaginta in their efforts to bring Jews to faith in Jesus Christ 2. A number of the Apocryphal books were also apocalyptic, that is, focusing on the last days, the KIngdom of God in battle against the kingdoms of this world and the downfall of this world's empires. This was considered dangerous and liable to provoke Rome against the Jews. Alternative Greek translations to the Septuaginta, which was considered &amp;quot;loose&amp;quot;, were adopted by the Rabbis. These were the translations of three proselytes to Judaism, Theodosious, Aquillas, and Symmachus. The Jewish Rabbinic &amp;quot;Council&amp;quot; of Jamnia (Yavneh on the Mediterraenian coast of Israel) in 90 A.D., under the leadership of Rabban Yochanan ben Zakkai, effectively excluded the Apocraphal books (along with the Septuaginta) from the Jewish Canon by requiring, for a book to be considered canonical, that it have been written in Hebrew (and Aramaic). Actually, a number of the apocryphal books, or portions thereof,  had been written originally in Hebrew, most notably, the Book of Ben Sirach (Ecclesiasticus) found in Hebrew at Qumran with the rest of the Dead Sea Scrolls, but this was unknown to Yohanan Ben Zakkai and the Council of Jamnia in the first century. Under the impetus of Renaissance learning, Protestant scholars, now able to translate the Bible directly from the original languages of Hebrew and Greek, instead of having to go through the Latin Vulgate, went directly to the Hebrew text. But this was the Hebrew text (eventually to be called the &amp;quot;Massoretic text&amp;quot;) of the canon of books that had been authorized by the Council of Jamnia. In this way, most Protestant churches came to not include the Apocryphal books in their Canon of Scripture.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are the books which are most frequently referred to by the title ''Apocrypha'':&lt;br /&gt;
*[[1 Esdras]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2 Esdras]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[1 Maccabees]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2 Maccabees]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Tobit]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Judith]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Wisdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ecclesiasticus]], also known as Sirach&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Baruch]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Epistle of Jeremiah]] is sometimes listed as separate book or the last chapter of Baruch &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Prayer of Manasseh]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Greek language additions to the [[Book of Esther]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additions to the book of Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Story of Susanna]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bel and the Dragon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 90-95 A.D. the Jewish [[Council of Jamnia]] revised the canon of the Old Testament, ensuring that the books involved conformed to the Torah, were written in the Hebrew language, written in Palestine, and written before 400 B.C.  As a result, the Apocrypha was removed from the canon. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://agards-bible-timeline.com/q2_bible_english.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The New Testament===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[New Testament]] is a collection of twenty-seven books and letters, written by the early Christian community, and written primarily in [[Greek]]. The emphasis of the New Testament is the life, teachings, and gift of salvation from the central figure of the whole work, Jesus of Nazareth.  These books are grouped into the following:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
====[[Gospels|The Gospels]]====&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Gospels'' contain the history of Jesus.  The ''Acts of the Apostles'' are a continuance of the Gospels, documenting the history of the early church, beginning immediately following Jesus' death and resurrection.  Of the authors, only Matthew and John had met Jesus; they were among His disciples during His earthly ministry.  Mark was a companion of Peter, and his gospel was the first to be written down, about A.D. 50.  Luke is considered the author of both his gospel and the ''Acts''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of Matthew]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of Mark]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of Luke]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acts of the Apostles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[[Pauline Epistles]]====&lt;br /&gt;
The Pauline Epistles are letters (epistles) written to early Christian communities written by the [[Apostle Paul]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Romans]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle to the Corinthians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle to the Corinthians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Galatians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Philippians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to Philemon]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle to the Thessalonians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle to the Thessalonians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Ephesians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Colossians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle to Timothy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle to Timothy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to Titus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''Possibly the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]] Bible scholarship over the last two centuries has denied that Paul wrote Ephesians, 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus; and doubted that he wrote Colossians and 2 Thessalonians.  However, all the epistles listed above except Hebrews say they are written by Paul.  As they are authoritative Scripture which &amp;quot;cannot lie&amp;quot;, their claims should be believed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is speculation that Paul may have written the ''Epistle to the Hebrews'', which does not mention an author; however, it could easily have been written by any early Christian except for Timothy, who is mentioned by name in the final chapter.  The controversy, however, does not affect the genuineness of the epistle. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Unger, pg. 748; Eusebius ''The History of the Church'' 3:3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[[General Epistles]]====&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle of James]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle of Peter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle of Peter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Third Epistle of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle of Jude]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Revelation====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Book of Revelation]] is the last work in the New Testament as well as the whole Bible, written close to A.D. 100 by the [[Apostle John]] during his exile on the Greek island of [[Patmos]]. Revelation is concerned with the condition of the [[Seven Churches of Asia]] before going deeply into a description of the [[Last Days]] prior to the beginning of the [[Millennial Age]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most [[Fundamentalism|Fundamentalists]] hold to &amp;quot;[[Dispensationalism]]&amp;quot;, a theory of the meaning of Revelations and other prophecies that was developed in the 19th century and is summarized in the ''Scofield Reference Bible'' (1909, 1917).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Non-uniformity of language and style of original Scriptures==&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Old Testament and the New Testament, in the original languages of Hebrew (and Aramaic) and Greek, exhibit a non uniformity of style and language. This is in sharp contrast to most modern translations which treat the Scriptures throughout as if it was one book instead the many books they are. Modern translations can be erudite, dignified, folksy and common, clear and geared for the &amp;quot;common man&amp;quot;, or replete with language resonant with literary associations for the &amp;quot;accomplished&amp;quot; reader.  But they are that way througout. The Biblical originals, on the other hand, for example in the Hebrew, have imbedded within narrative of one period, as the narrative of the deeds of the prophets Debora, a similar poetic recounting in a much more ancient and even archaic Hebrew, probably emanating from a chant from the time of Deborah herself. The same with the narrative and poetic portions concerning Moses. There are even different Hebrew languages from the same period but different authors, having come from different origins and cultural levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the New Testament, an example of non-uniformity can be found in the stark differences of languages in the Gospel of Luke, written by Luke the physician. The early accounts, those concerning the birth of Jesus and early life, are written in a stilted and often crude Greek while the rest of the Gospel is written in fine Greek befitting of the background and ability of a learned physician. But when the stilted and crude Greek is retranslated, word for word and phrase for phrase, into the Hebrew current in the first century in most parts of Israel, it becomes excellent Hebrew - Mishnaic Hebrew. This is because of the intent and fastidiousness of Luke, who derived his material, as he says,  from people that had been &amp;quot;on the scene&amp;quot; , and his success in transmitting it faithfully as he had received it. Both the Old and New Testaments, for various reasons, exhibit little or no concern to &amp;quot;level through&amp;quot; or override the content of what they are saying by stylistic considerations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inspiration===&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Old Testament is written by many [[homo sapiens|human]] authors, New Testament authors know that these men were writing under the inspiration of God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apostle [[Paul]] wrote that &amp;quot;All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness&amp;quot; (2 Timothy 3:16).&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly the apostle [[Saint Peter|Peter]] wrote, &amp;quot;Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit&amp;quot; (2 Peter 1:20-21).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Formation of New Testament and Jewish technical transmission====&lt;br /&gt;
In the first century and prior, the ear was more important than the eye, as far as retaining in memory. Jews would receive orally, that is, from hearing, the laws that they believed originated with Moses and then passed them on to others, down through the generations.It was important to link the present rabbis by names who taught it with the rabbis by name who had passed it on to them, on back as far as possible to Moses on Mt. Sinai. This was the startling difference of Jesus.  By saying &amp;quot;You have heard it said, but I say unto you...&amp;quot; , He was by-passing Moses and the others after and getting His teaching direct from the Father. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Jewish way of receiving (QBL) and handing on (MSR) is summed up in the lead saying of the &amp;quot;Ethics of the Fathers&amp;quot;  tractate of the [[Mishna]], &amp;quot;Moses received Torah from God at Sinai. He transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, the elders to the prophets, the prophets to the members of the Great Assembly [Sanhedrin] (1:1).&amp;quot;  The teaching thus transmitted was memorized word for word by groups of disciples (Talmidim) together, thereby minimizing, by the common knowledge and plublic repetitions, all innovations and errors, though there might well have been &amp;quot;stylizing&amp;quot; for ease of retention and recall. receiving and handing on (transmission), receiving and handing on. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This methodology, with its technical Hebrew terminology appears in the New Testament with the same technical meaning and purpose, for how the earliest Christian teaching was carried on prior to the formation of the New Testament and during the time of its formation. This ensured the validity of the teaching and its authenticity going back, not to Moses, but to the time of Jesus Himself. &amp;quot;For I handed over  (Gk. pare'doka, Heb. MSR) to you at the first what I also received (Gk. pare'labon, Heb. QBL) that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures, and that He was raised on the third day, according to the Scriptures...&amp;quot; l Cor. 15:3. Paul knew all of the &amp;quot;deposit of faith&amp;quot; three ways, in the usual &amp;quot;collaborative&amp;quot; way of God - from Scriptures (the Old Testament), from experience (seeing the living Christ on the road to Damascas), and from authenticated oral tradition/transmission involving &amp;quot;receiving&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;handing on&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Authority of Bible in religious communities==&lt;br /&gt;
The role of the Bible in the life of differing communities varies widely by both the inner tenents of the community and the outer influences bearing on the community. &lt;br /&gt;
===Judaism===&lt;br /&gt;
Orthodox Judaism through the centuries, while it was only marginally affected by growing secularization and modern learning, held to a &amp;quot;differing level of  level of authority&amp;quot; understanding of the authority of the Hebrew Bible. This did not imply a different level of inspiration, but rather that importance to the regulation of life was prime for the Torah of Moses, the 5 books of the Law. But the Pharasaic teaching also posited an Oral Law given to Moses by God that was passed on through the centuries through Joshua, the prophets, pairs of Rabbis, until this day.  The Oral law is found in the Talmud (Mishna and the Gemara together) The oral law became the decisive interpreter, teacher and regulator of the Written Law and determined the course of Jewish Orthodox life. The second section of the Old Testament, the Prophets, is known to the Jewish Community primarily through the synagogue readings of the prophets, the Haftorah, that are assigned to conclude the weekly reading of the Law. The Psalms, the most formative of all  the Writings, besides being common throughout the synagogue services, are used in various devotional prayer contexts. Orthodox Judaism has little been affected by modern Higher Criticism of the Bible. Reformed Judaism, originally developed in Germany, and Conservative Judaism, to a lesser extent, have been greatly affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mainline Protestants===&lt;br /&gt;
Mainline Protestantism, represented in the major churches and their seminaries, has greatly been affected by &amp;quot;modernism&amp;quot; based on advanced scholarly research, especially from Germany in the 19th century. The &amp;quot;Higher Criticism&amp;quot; ignored God's participation in the production of Scripture. Prime among these theories is the Documentary theory of  Penteteuch  origins (Wellhausen- Graff) that posit that Moses wrote little or nothing, Instead the Bible originated in four sources coming from various periods. These are sources are termed J (for the use of &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; for the name of God), E (for the use of &amp;quot;Elohim&amp;quot;), P (priestly), and D (Deutoronomic). The spirit of the New Testament is far more important than the text of either Testament for modern Protestant theology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Orthodox Jewish critique of Documentary theory====  &lt;br /&gt;
Jewish Orthodox scholars have pointed to flaws of the Documentary Hypothesis. For instance, Orthodox Jewish Scholar Cassuto  has pointed out that rather than the names for God varying according to author and period, they vary according to emphasis from the same period, that of Moses - &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; being used for the God in his dealing with His covenental people Israel, and &amp;quot;Elohim&amp;quot; being use when His dealing with mankind are emphasis. Likewise the two terms usually translated &amp;quot;making a covenant&amp;quot;, lkhrot brit (to &amp;quot;cut&amp;quot; a covenant) and lehaqim brit (to &amp;quot;raise&amp;quot; a covenenat) are not from two sources but mean different things - to initiate a covenant and to fulfill a covenant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evangelical Protestants===&lt;br /&gt;
Evangelical Protestantism belives strongly in the divine inspiration and inerrancy of the whole Bible and has been the most receptive of Biblical Authority. Believing in full inspiration of the all Scripture does not mean to evangelicalism equal importance of all Scriptures for the healthy growth of the Christian community. This is because Evangelicalism, following Scripture's own understanding, believes in progressive revelation throughout Biblical time, culminating in Jesus Christ, and no further (thus obviating the role of Tradition). Thus Evangelicalism, does not hold to the application of Mosaic Legislation, and other biblical elements that Orthodox Judaism holds to. This applies to faith and to morals. The Mosaic regulation on executing a rebellious child does not present a problem to evangelical thought as, according to Paul and Hebrews, the Law has been rendered obsolete by the New Covenant. The Destruction of the Temple and the place for sacrifice of all kinds, present no problem for evangelicalism, as they did for Judasim, as Christ's sacrifice on the cross has now &amp;quot;fulfilled&amp;quot; the proscriptions of the Law and the ceremonials attached. Thus there is a sort of Levels of Authority understanding for evangelicalism similar (but for different reasons)  to the levels of authority of Judaism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evangelical Churches vigorously promote the reading of Scripture through Sunday sermons and Bible study programs. Emphasis is placed on &amp;quot;each one understanding&amp;quot;. Coupled with American individualism, and lack of tradional vehicles of authority, this sometimes leads to spinterring and each man's interpretation &amp;quot;is as good as any other&amp;quot;. Nevertheless, the &amp;quot;Fiundamentals&amp;quot; defined in 1910 are strongly retained by the Evangelical Churches - the divinity of Christ, His death for sins and Resurrection from the dead, His second coming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Eastern Orthodox===&lt;br /&gt;
The Orthodox Churches througout the world, whether of Greek, Russian, Rumanian, the various middle eastern varieties, emphasis the synod (Council) of Bishops, basis on the example of the &amp;quot;Council&amp;quot; of Jerusalem in the book of Acts, as the God authorized agent of interpretation and application of the Scriptures. Understanding that Jesus' words, &amp;quot; He (the Holy Spirit) wil lead you into all truth&amp;quot;, Orthodoxy believes that the synod of bishops, none of whom are individually infallible, are given guidance from the Holy Spirit so that the Scriptures are rightly applied to the Christian Community enabling the Church to never stray from Christ. That is, the Church is given &amp;quot;indefectability&amp;quot;. A minority Orthodox Church thought  holds to &amp;quot;infallibility&amp;quot; in synodal decision rather than or instead of &amp;quot;indefectability&amp;quot;. Scripture in the Orthodox churches are butressed by creedal formulations, the decisions of belief of past synods, and are less susceptible to the modern Higher Criticism. The Resurrection of Christ, virgin birth, return of Christ from Heaven to Earth, are all part and parcel of these churches. Individual interpretation of Scripture and manner of life are limited then by the teaching authority (the magisterium) granted to the Epsicopate - the Synod of bishops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Roman Catholic===&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic Church, like the Orthodox Churches have a strong sense of the Authority given to the Bishops by Christ to teach, interpret, defend the Faith and therefore to exercise the responsibility to interprete Scripture to the Faithful. But since Vatican ll, there has been an increased effort to bring Scripture knowledge to the laity and now there has been an increase of Scripture reading and study programs throughout most sections of the Church. This as been abetted by the Catholic Charismatic movement which has had the effect of promoting individual appropriation of the gifts and graces of the Holy Spirit and with that, the devotional and intellectual use of  Holy Scriptures. However, the role of &amp;quot;Majesterium&amp;quot;, that is the Teaching Authority, strongly sets limits to individual interpretation. The Roman Catholic church understands that though the Majesterium is given to all the bishops, the definitive exercise is limited to one bishop - the bishop ov Rome, the Pope. Further, it is believed that the Pope, when declaring dogma (teaching) ex-Cathedra (from the chair) speaks infaillibly (on matters of faith and morals). The first time the Pope has promulgated dogma ex-cathedra was to promulgate the doctrine itself of Papal Infallibility. The Pope , through the Vatican prelates and all the bishops can regulate much of Catholic community life, and some of the regualtion based on the interpretation of Scripture or the application of interporetation of Scripture. An example of this is the prohibition of abortion. The Church has accepted most of the modern Higher Critical methodology of Scripture, including the Documentary theory of origins first developed within German Protestantism. But the effects of this on the tenents of the Christian Faith  are much mitigated due to the creedal affirmations of the Church developed centuries ago and Papal authority. This the Roman Catholic Church does not waver on the Deity of Christ, the Trinity, the death and resurrection of Christ, and the second comming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evangelical Understanding of the History of the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
Rejecting the &amp;quot;Higher Criticism&amp;quot; accepted by the mainline Protestant denominations, Evangelicals and many Catholics hold to a more traditional history of the Bible.  This section summarizes their views.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gospel of Luke in Arab.gif|thumb|This tenth-century Egyptian codex was donated to Pope Eugenius IV by the Coptic delegates at the Council of Ferrara-Florence. Translated from a Coptic original, it is one of the earliest Arabic versions of any part of the New Testament, none of which can be dated before the late eighth or ninth centuries.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oldest books of the Bible are certainly the five books of the Torah and ''Job''.  In ''1st Kings'' 6:1, Solomon is stated to have begun building the Temple &amp;quot;''in the 480th year after the children of Israel were come up out of the land of Egypt''&amp;quot;.  It had been established by scholars and historians that Solomon had begun building the Temple in the fourth year of his reign, or 961 B.C., making the [[date of the Exodus]] under Moses to have been 1441 B.C.  During the following forty years Moses wrote the Torah and ''Job'', completing them before his death at [[Mt. Nebo]] about 1400 B.C.  According to Biblical scholar and historian Robert D. Wilson the Torah as it stands dates from the time of Moses, the five books constitute one continuous work, and was written by a single individual, Moses himself (Wilson, pg 11).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The remaining books of the Old Testament were written at various times since the death of Moses, with ''Malachi'', the last Old Testament book, being written about 455 B.C.  During this period each of the books was written and re-written on parchment or papyrus, with the editors taking great care in their work; a single Biblical book hand-written today can take weeks to complete.  The older scrolls were disposed of by burial or systematic destruction when worn from normal usage; as a result, the oldest surviving examples of Biblical manuscripts are those which have been carefully preserved either by direct actions of people (such as monasteries), or by removal from forces of decay.  Currently, the oldest surviving manuscripts are those found within the caves of Qumran in 1948 and known as the [[Dead Sea Scrolls]], dating between 250 B.C. to A.D. 70; the complete ''Isaiah'' scroll of this collection dates to 150 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around 200 B.C. the [[Septuagint]], a Greek-language version of the Old Testament, was completed.  This was due to the Hellenization of large areas of the Middle East after the conquest of Alexander the Great, making Greek the de-facto language for everyday communications and business.  The Septuagint marks the first time in history that the Bible was translated into a foreign language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early New Testament history===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1st Timothy 5:8, Paul quoted as scripture ''&amp;quot;the laborer is worthy of his hire.&amp;quot;''  This line is found nowhere else in the Bible except Matthew 10:10 and Luke 5:7.  In 2nd Peter 3:15-16, Peter classes Paul's letters with &amp;quot;other scriptures&amp;quot;.  Both lines are indicative of the writing down and general use of the New Testament prior to A.D. 60 (Halley, pg. 741-742).  Spurious &amp;quot;gospels&amp;quot; which are known to have appeared by A.D. 100, make references to the New Testament.  [[Clement of Rome]], writing in his own letter to the Corinthians in A.D. 95, refers to ''Matthew'', ''Luke'', ''Corinthians'', ''Hebrews'', ''1st Timothy'', and ''1st Peter'' (Halley, pg. 743).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oldest surviving New Testament fragment of which there is a reliable date is the [[John Rylands Fragment]] (P52) of the ''Gospel of John'', dating from 117-138 A.D., just decades from when the Gospel was first written. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biblefacts.org/history/oldtext.html N.T. Ancient Manuscripts]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The time span between the writing of the New Testament and the oldest surviving fragments are well under two hundred years.  By comparison, Greek classics such as [[Herodotus]], [[Plato]], [[Euripides]], and [[Homer]] have a time span well over a thousand years each between the date of the oldest known fragment of writing and the time period they were first written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Translations==&lt;br /&gt;
===The Peshitta===&lt;br /&gt;
The second translated version of the Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament (after the Greek Septuaginta) was the Aramaic language Peshitta.  In 36 A.D., both the Queen of Adiabene (the last existing Province of the hated and feared by the Jews Assyrian Empire), known in Greek as Queen Helena (not the mother of Constantine) and known to the Jews as Queen ShlomZion (&amp;quot;Peace of Zion&amp;quot;), and her son King Ezad were converted to Judaism. Queen Helena's conversion, as wiell as others of the Kingdom, furthered the already developing translation of the Hebrew Scriptures in her Kingdom's language -Aramaic. That developing translation came to be known as the Peshitta - meaning simple or common speech, in much the same way as the Hebrew Bible would be translated into Latin by Jerome, with extensive help from a Rabbi,and the resultant translation would be called the Vulgate - meaning simple or common speech. The Peshitta, retaining elements of the then Jewish &amp;quot;[[Targum]]ic&amp;quot; (interpretive) and other Jewish understandings of the Hebrew Bible (see[[Midrash]]), is primarily based on the Pre-Masoretic Hebrew Scriptures - though certain books, such as the Prophet Isaiah,are translations primarily from the Septuagint  The development of the Old Testament Peshitta translation is held by some to have taken place alternatively in Adiabene's nearby neighbor Edessa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Thomas and his followers went to India, others (possibly Adai (Thaddeus), the Galilean from Caesarea Phillipi among them) arrived in [[Adiabene]], and having gone probaly to the synagogues first, as did the Apostle Paul), they found already, if not a populous, then an elite governmental element, conversant with the Biblical message in Aramaic. From these people, hearing the preaching of the messengers from Israel ,came believers in Jesus Christ, and soon after, came the translation of the Greek New Testament Scriptures into Aramaic, and so the Peshitta was added to by inclusion of the New Testament in Aramaic. Unlike the Greek canon of the New Testament Scriptures, the Peshitta originally did not include the following books: the Second Epistle of Peter, the Second Epistle of John, the Third Epistle of John, the Epistle of Jude and the Book of Revelation. But these books translated into the Syriac (as Christian Aramaic is known) are part of the Peshitta now and used by the Aramaic based churches, primarily in India and the Middle East - the Syrian Catholic Church, the Assyrian Church of the East (Holy Apostolic and Catholic Church of the East), the Indian Orthodox Church, the Chaldean Catholic Church, the Maronite Church, the Malankara Syrian Orthodox Church, the Syro-Malabar Church and the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adiabene and its surroundings then became the sending center for a mission to the East that would eventually, taking advantage of the newly rediscovered monsoon winds blowing for months across the Arabian sea, making it possible for ships to no longer hug the coasts, and taking advantage of the &amp;quot;Silk Road&amp;quot; all the way from Antioch in Syria to China, take the message of Jesus Christ to India (bringing about the Aramaic (Syriac) language churches of Kerala) and even to China itself. And so, the Peshitta, written in the Middle East, become the Scriptures, for a while, of the Far East Churches of Jesus Christ, particularly in India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Vulgate===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jerome]], a Latin scholar deeply interested in the study of the Scriptures, completed the second edition of the Bible in the Latin language.  The ''[[Vulgate]]'' was meant to replace the inaccuracies of the earlier ''[[Vetus Latina]]'', the standard Bible of the early Catholic Church.  Jerome had moved to [[Jerusalem]] in 382, and set to work on what eventually became a fresh translation of the Bible from the Greek of the ''Septuagint'' to translating the New Testament into Latin; from 390-405 he decided to re-translate his Old Testament directly from the Hebrew then in use by the Jewish community.  The ''Vulgate'' had a marked influence in church history, and remained the standard Latin Bible in the Roman Catholic Church for centuries; such was the length of time in use that it was finally replaced by the ''[[Nova Vulgata]]'' in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
==Printing==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gutenburg1.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Printers copy of a page from a Gutenberg Bible, printed in Germany about 1469.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Johannes Gutenberg]] of [[Mainz]], [[Germany]] invented the first mechanical printing press in 1448.  His machine consisted of a large press which when cranked down, pressed a sheet of paper upon a platform in which were set thousands of inked metal letter typefaces (called &amp;quot;movable type&amp;quot;), set in place to read for a particular page.  The first book in history printed by this method was the [[Gutenberg Bible]], in the ''Vulgate'' Latin version, of which 180 were printed, and approximately 50 survive today in varying conditions around the world.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gutenberg Bible marked another first: printed Bibles could be mass produced to get into the hands of many people at a low cost. They first had to be translated out of Latin into a common language, and [[Martin Luther]] made the great German translation, 1522-1534.  The Protestant Reformers emphasized that laymen should study the Bible, and printing made it possible to go beyond the interpretationsd shown in stained glass windows to the actual text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==English language versions of the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wycliff's Bible===&lt;br /&gt;
The first translation of the Bible into English was made under the supervision of the English cleric [[John Wyclif]] in the 1380's, with the assistance of Nicholas Hereford and John Purvey.  Wyclif held that the Bible should be placed directly in the hands of the people, but was this was opposed by the English Church hierarchy of his day; indeed, one of Wyclif's opponents, Henry Knighton, compared giving the Bible to the people in English to &amp;quot;casting pearls before swine&amp;quot;.  Archbishop Arundel of Canterbury promulgated a ban on all English Bibles in 1407, and possession of one was considered evidence of [[heresy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wyclif's was a scholarly translation, based on the [[Latin]], [[Greek]], and [[Hebrew]] texts, but was found to be unweildy due to its adherence to Latin grammar (in which, for instance, verbs tend to be at the end of sentences).  A second Wycliffite translation was prepared late in this period, which avoided this problem, but due to the fact that it could only be distributed in manuscript form, it was an expensive volume.  Outside of the nobility and gentry, it was more common to see only a single [[The Gospels|Gospel]], or  a copy of the Psalms, than an entire Bible, which cost more than the average working person could earn in a year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the next century, its form of English gradually became antiquated, leading English Protestants such as [[William Tyndale]] to feel that an entirely new translation was needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tyndale===&lt;br /&gt;
During the middle of the 16th century there was a renewed sense of the need to get the Bible directly into the hands of the common man; prior to that the Bible was restricted to readings in the Church alone.  The Reformers were a group of people who were shocked at the differences between what the Roman Catholic Church was practicing as opposed to what the Bible stated can or cannot be done (this was one of the causes of the [[Reformation]]).  At great cost to themselves, the Reformers began the work of translating the Bible in the various languages of Europe; the printing press would ensure the newly-translated Bibles would be mass-produced.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[William Tyndale]] was committed to getting the Bible in the hands of his English countrymen.  Expressing open defiance of the Pope, Tyndale declared that if God would spare his life he would make it possible for even an ordinary farmer to know more about the Scriptures than the Pope. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tbaptist.com/aab/tyndale.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Tyndale's translation of the New Testament was completed by 1525.  By April, 1526, 6,000 copies were printed and delivered to England. Official opposition led to the destruction of most of them.  Nevertheless, the printing press rendered it impossible to completely suppress such a book, and new copies were printed and smuggled into [[England]] Tyndale was arrested and charged with heresy for his efforts on May 21, 1536, and was executed the following year.  His efforts at translating the Bible led to the Matthews and Bishop's Bibles, then finally to the [[King James Version]], where ninety percent of the text closely follows Tyndale's translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Authorised or King James Version===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:E-sword.jpg|thumb|200px|right|The internet has increased the availability of the Bible world-wide.  Shown here is a screenshot to [[E-Sword]], a freely-downloadable Bible study program. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.e-sword.net E-Sword]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (Rick Meyers, 2007)]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1601 King [[James I]] selected forty-seven of the ablest scholars in [[England]] to undertake the creation of a standard Bible in English, based upon careful translations of the [[Masoretic Text]] used by the Jewish community, and the best Greek translations (especially the ''[[Textus Receptus]]'') then available.  The scholars were divided into six committees in [[Oxford]], [[Westminster]], and [[Cambridge]], with each scholar had dedicating himself to doing a portion of the Bible, often consulting each other to check the flow and harmony of the work in progress.  The result was the 1611 Authorised Version, known in [[United States of America|America]] as the [[King James Bible|King James Version]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of the Authorised Version were profound.  Using less than 2,500 different words in its vocabulary, this Bible was written in a poetic style matched by few.  The work influenced the writings of [[Shakespeare]].  [[John Milton]] has numerous images taken from this Bible in his ''[[Paradise Lost]]''.  The direct style of writing caused it to be easily available to the common man.  Poets and writers, such as [[Herman Melville]], [[Walt Whitman]], [[Emily Dickinson]] and many others were deeply inspired by it.  It altered the course of English history, with England growing to a world power since the book's publication; when asked by a visiting dignitary what made England great, [[Queen Victoria]] pulled out her copy of the Bible and declared &amp;quot;This is the secret of England's greatness.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other versions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the Bible is available in many versions across the English-speaking world, and has been translated into languages spoken by the vast majority of people on Earth, and even portions into a recently-created language from the fictional world of [[Star Trek]], [[Klingon]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kli.org/wiki/index.php?Klingon%20Bible%20Translation%20Project Klingon Bible Translation Project]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The past two decades saw the emergence of [[Internet]] use; the creation of the Bible as a software program was inevitable, and several, such as [[E-Sword]] and Theophilos, are available at no cost with a wealth of Bible-study material as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bible Scientific Foreknowledge==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bible scientific foreknowledge]] holds that the Bible shows an understanding of scientific knowledge beyond that believed to exist at the time the Bible was composed.  Many Christian scientists and apologists such as the Christian scientists and apologists at [[Creation Ministries International]], [[Answers in Genesis]],  and [[CreationWiki]] assert that the [http://creationwiki.org/index.php/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge Bible contains knowledge that shows an understanding of scientific knowledge beyond that believed to exist at the time the Bible was composed].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creationwiki.org/index.php/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge  Bible Scientific Foreknowledge]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1718/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i1/medicine.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Humor in the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Humor in the Bible}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible, especially the Old Testament, contains irony, puns, sarcasm, etc. It may be noted that the sense of what is humorous varies from people to people and from nation to nation, as well as varying from age to age. What caused a chuckle, smile, or laughter in the biblical &amp;quot;genre&amp;quot; was more connected with ''satisfaction'' at the vindication of righteousness among men. Thus to our day and age, and the commonality of people, for believers and non believers, the meaning of the spewing up of Jonah on the shores (even the great fish could not stomach him!) might be viewed as God working out His original will in history, Jonah flight from responsiblity being aborted, for the &amp;quot;days and ages&amp;quot; of the Bible, there was the added satisfaction derived from the understanding that God was not mocked by the rebellion of Jonah. Likewise that the &amp;quot;many cattle&amp;quot; also found repentence and acceptance by God, would not have brought the smile of glee, mingled with doubt,  but the smile of satisfaction that God's wide heart found its exultant victory over the measly, narrow perspective of the renagade prophet. There was no shame to stifle the Biblical chuckle at the &amp;quot;hows&amp;quot; of the vindication of God's justice. Yet, what we consider humorous also appears:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:After noticing that his father-in-law Laban was not treating him as in the past, Jacob decided to flee with his family. Rachel, one of Jacob’s wives, stole her father Laban’s teraphim (statues used for idolatry and/or divination). Laban pursued them and intercepted them in the Gilead mountains (Genesis 31:30): &amp;quot;Why have you stolen my gods?&amp;quot; Laban said to Jacob. The Midrash comments that it cannot be much of a god if it can be stolen (Midrash Genesis Rabbah 74:8). Jonsson (1985, 44-45) suggests that there is humor (albeit &amp;quot;rough&amp;quot; humor) in the fact that, not only was Laban deceived, but his idols were actually underneath his daughter Rachel’s posterior while she claimed that the &amp;quot;manner of women&amp;quot; was upon her. This idol did not get much respect. [http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/economic/friedman/bibhumor.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bible Translations==&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible has been translated many times and in many ways so anyone, from the youngest child to the learned scholar, can read the entire scpripture in their language and reading level. A Latin version is the [[Latin Vulgate]] Bible.  Here are some common English versions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amplified Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Douey-Rheims]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[English Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Good News Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[King James Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Living Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New American Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New English Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New International Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New King James Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Revised Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Revised Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Septuagint]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wycliffe Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible]] - still a work-in-progress here at Conservapedia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bible versions==&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from Bibles that include the [[Apocrypha]],  The [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]] is a distinct version that was produced to justify many of the unique doctrines of [[Jehovah's Witnesses]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bible exegesis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christian apologetics|Evidence supporting the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bible prophecy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Biblical accuracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Famous Bible paintings]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Midrash]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Targum]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Way of Salvation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Messianic Prophecies]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel reading in the Church: the Turgama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wicked Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
===Bible societies ===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.americanbible.org/ American Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biblesociety.org/ United Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ibs.org/ The International Bible Society (New York/Colorado Springs)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wbtc.com/site/PageServer World Bible Translation Center]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wycliffe.org/home.htm Wycliffe Bible Translators]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.labibliaweb.com/ La Biblia] In Spanish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Online, internet, and downloadable Bibles===&lt;br /&gt;
====Hebrew====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0.htm Hebrew-English Bible] ([[Jewish Publication Society of America|JPS]] 1917 translation; includes Hebrew audio)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://tanakhml2.alacartejava.net/cocoon/tanakhml/d13.php2xml?sfr=1&amp;amp;prq=1&amp;amp;pnt=tru&amp;amp;acc=tru&amp;amp;dia=tru&amp;amp;enc=heb XML Hebrew-English (KJV) Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/Hebrew_OT/ Old Testament in Hebrew]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Greek====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ccel.org/w/westcott/gnt/toc.htm Koine Greek New Testament]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.htmlbible.com/sacrednamebiblecom/moderngreek/ Modern Greek Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Latin====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.LatinVulgate.com/ Latin Vulgate] — Latin Vulgate with parallel Douay-Rheims and King James English translations&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.sacredbible.org/ SacredBible.org] — Latin Vulgate translation of the Bible&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/Vulgate/ Jerome's Latin Vulgate (405 A.D.)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====English====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.audio-bible.com/bible/bible.html AudioBible] — Audio version of the King James Version.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.blueletterbible.org/ Blue Letter Bible] — On-line interactive reference library continuously updated from the teachings and commentaries of selected pastors and teachers who hold to the conservative, historical Christian faith.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.e-sword.net E-sword] — Downloadable Bible for Windows.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.onlinebible.net/ The Online Bible North America] — Downloadable Bible for Windows.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.theophilos.sk/ Theophilos Bible program]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/ASB/ American Standard Version].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/ English Standard Version] from Good News/Crossway (the publisher).&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.verselink.org/ King James Version with dictionary].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/KJV/ King James Version].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.newlivingtranslation.com New Living Translation]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bible.oremus.org/ New Revised Standard Version].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.europepourchrist.org/biblesite/WEB/ World English Bible].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dynamicbible.com/ King James Version built using AJAX technologies], with Strongs and Greek Morphological Codes by Robinson.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/index.htm#index The Hypertext Bible] with side-by-side translations in English, Latin, Greek, and Hebrew at the [[Internet Sacred Text Archive]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.biblegateway.com/ Bible Gateway at GospelCom.net] text search in any one of many translations in numerous languages.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.biblereadthrough.com/ Bible Read-Through] — read through the Bible in a year aid.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.TheFreeBible.com/ TheFreeBible.com] Bible software downloads&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.scripture4all.org/ Interlinear (word-by-word) translation of the Christian Bible] Hebrew and Koine Greek&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.aramaicpes&amp;lt;!-- spam filter --&amp;gt;hitta.com/aramaic_nt_resources.htm - Aramaic New Testament resources&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/en/versions.php Over 40 versions of the Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.armenianchurchlibrary.com/Bibletranslationsandstudies.html Eastern and Western Armenian Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bible9.com/ Online Bible (King James Version &amp;amp; Old Testament)]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/LSG_FR/ Bible — Louis Segond de 1910]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.latinvulgate.com/christverse.aspx Complete Sayings of Christ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bible.crosswalk.com/ParallelBible/ Crosswalk.com Parallel Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.blueletterbible.org/search.html#verse Blue Letter Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://recoveryversion.org/ Recovery Version Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Spanish====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.wbtc.com/site/PageServer?pagename=downloads_spanish Spanish Bible] PDT version&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.labibliaweb.com/cid/1 Versiones de la Biblia] In Spanish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Turkish====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.incil.info Turkish Bible] (Turkish Old and New Testament)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Finnish====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.raamattu-kirja.com Finnish Bible] (Finnish Old and New Testament)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://vastaus.net Raamattu] (Study Finnish Bible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Japanese====&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ibsstl.org/bibles/japanese/index.php On-line version hosted by the International Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bible.or.jp/e/index.html Japan Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Others====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://agards-bible-timeline.com/q2_bible_english.html Bible Timeline]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.myjewishlearning.com/texts/bible/TO_Torah_880.htm?OVRAW=Torah&amp;amp;OVKEY=torah&amp;amp;OVMTC=standard My Jewish Learning.com]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://search.americanbible.org/ American Bible Society] to search NASB, KJV, CEV, ASV and others.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://etext.virginia.edu/kjv.browse.html University of Virginia Library] KJV word proximity search.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.1enormousidea.com/Default.aspx?tabid=42 Many translations in English, verse by verse]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bible-marathi.com Nava Karar] NT Translation from Greek to Marathi &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bible-researcher.com/links12.html Gender-neutral Bible translations].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.evangelicalbible.com/why.htm Word-for-Word vs.Thought-for-Thought translation] Outlines the difference between formal and dynamic equivalent translation philosopy.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.kli.org/wiki/index.php?Klingon%20Bible%20Translation%20Project  Klingon Bible].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Commentaries and analysis===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bibleseo.com/ Bible study topics] - Bible studies and exposition online&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ldolphin.org/icc-am.html Biblical chronology] by Alan Montgomery, B.Sc.(Hon)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dinur.org/resources/resourceCategoryDisplay.aspx?categoryID=411&amp;amp;rsid=478 Biblical History], The Jewish History Resource Center — Dinur Center for Research in Jewish History, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.chabad.org/article.asp?aid=63255 Judaica Press Translation] — online Jewish translation of the Tanakh.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.angdatingdaan.org/biblicaltopics/bib_bible_1.htm Reading and Understanding the Bible].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://en.bibleinfo.com/ Source for Bible Answers].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.amazingfacts.org/school/af_logon.asp Amazing Facts Bible Studies].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.iishj.org/images/Bible.pdf Learning Bible Today] — a historical approach the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://eword.gospelcom.net/comments/gill/ John Gill's Exposition of the Bible] — verse by verse commentary.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/henry/mhc.i.html/ Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible] — unabridged.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.verselink.org/ Topical References]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.verselink.org/ Bible Dictionaries and Encyclopedia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wikis===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bible.tmtm.com BibleWiki]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://wikible.org Wikible]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Achtemeier, Paul J., ed. ''Harper's Bible Dictionary'' (1985), 1190pp;  mainstream scholarship&lt;br /&gt;
* Ackroyd, P.R., ed. ''The Cambridge History of the Bible: From the Beginnings to Jerome; the West from the Fathers to the Reformation; the West from the Reformation to the Present Day'' (3 vol 1978), standard summary of scholarship; [http://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-History-Bible-Beginnings-Jerome/dp/0521099730/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1243248143&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1]; [http://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-History-Bible-Fathers-Reformation/dp/0521290171/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1243248143&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search vol 2]; [http://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-History-Bible-Reformation-Present/dp/0521290163/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1243248143&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 3] &lt;br /&gt;
* Coggins, R.J. ''Introducing the Old Testament'' (Oxford University Press: 1990), 172pp. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=22765464 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morgan, Robert, and John Barton. ''Biblical Interpretation'' (Oxford University Press: 1988), 342 pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=74356941 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Sakenfeld, Katharine Doob, ed.  ''The New Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible'' ('''NIDB''') (5 vol 2009), the latest mainstream scholarship&lt;br /&gt;
*Unger, Merril F. ''Unger's Bible Dictionary'', Moody Press, Chicago, IL (1966; new edition 2006); Evangelical&lt;br /&gt;
**Unger, Merril F. ''The New Unger's Bible Dictionary'', (2006); 1416pp; Evangelical&lt;br /&gt;
*Unger, Merril F. ''Unger's Bible Handbook'', Moody Press, Chicago, IL (1967);  Evangelical.&lt;br /&gt;
*Halley, Henry H. ''Halley's Bible Handbook'', Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MI (1965); Evangelical &lt;br /&gt;
* Sandys-Wunsch, John. ''What Have They Done to the Bible: A History of Modern Biblical Interpretation'' 2005) Scholarly history of transations and interpretations to 1900; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0814650287 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Williamspn, Peter. ''Catholic principles for interpreting scripture: a study of the Pontifical Biblical Commission's The interpretation of the Bible in the Church'' (2001); Catholic; [http://books.google.com/books?id=kooFtFGQsfsC&amp;amp;dq=intitle:bible+intitle:interpretation&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=b&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=2000&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpts and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Wilson, Robert D. ''A Scientific Investigation of the Old Testament'', Sunday School Times, Inc, Philadelphia, PA (1926).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Language===&lt;br /&gt;
*Blass, Frederich, and others. ''A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and other early Christian literature,'' translated by Robert W. Funk; University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (1961); German edition ''Grammatik des Neutestamentlichen Griechisch'' Friedrich Rehkopf, editor, 14th edition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &amp;amp; Ruprecht, 1976. &lt;br /&gt;
*Moulton, James H., and others. ''A Grammar of New Testament Greek'' (two volumes), edited by Wilbert Francis Howard, T&amp;amp;T Clark Publishers, Harrisburg, PA (1985); originally published 1920, Edinburgh, Scotland.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bauer, Walter. ''Griechisch-Deutsches Wörterbuch zu den Scriften des Neuen Testaments und der frühchristlichen Litteratur''. Kurt Aland and Barbara Aland, editors; 6th edition. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany (1988). Heading βιβλίον, columns 281-82.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Book of Worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JBauer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lonely&amp;diff=1099747</id>
		<title>Lonely</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lonely&amp;diff=1099747"/>
		<updated>2014-08-14T04:03:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JBauer: fix&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Addiction]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JBauer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elizabeth_and_Casper_ten_Boom&amp;diff=1099745</id>
		<title>Elizabeth and Casper ten Boom</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Elizabeth_and_Casper_ten_Boom&amp;diff=1099745"/>
		<updated>2014-08-14T04:01:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JBauer: comma&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Elizabeth and Casper ten Boom''' were the sister and father of Corrie ten Boom.  Their lives were ended in [[Nazi]] [[concentration camp]]s during [[World War II]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two were honored in 2008 with the title of 'Righteous Among the Nations' by [[Israel]]'s Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Remembrance Authority for being instrumental in saving nearly 800 Jewish lives during the [[Holocaust]] before they were discovered and imprisoned.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Christianity Today'', June 2008, Pg. 14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corrie ten Boom, author of ''The Hiding Place'', had already been honored in 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;References/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Boom, Elizabeth and Casper ten}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religious People]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JBauer</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:JBauer&amp;diff=1099744</id>
		<title>User:JBauer</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:JBauer&amp;diff=1099744"/>
		<updated>2014-08-14T03:53:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;JBauer: Created&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Hello!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My name is John Bauer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm on vacation, so I might be a bit inactive.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>JBauer</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>