<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Franzcarl</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Franzcarl"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Franzcarl"/>
	<updated>2026-10-11T23:45:08Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Satan&amp;diff=731276</id>
		<title>Satan</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Satan&amp;diff=731276"/>
		<updated>2009-12-14T18:31:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Franzcarl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:GustaveDoreParadiseLostSatanProfile.jpg|right|thumb|Gustave Doré's depiction of Satan from John Milton's Paradise Lost.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Satan''' or the '''Devil''' is the embodiment of evil, and plays a major role in Christian theology and literature, as well as in many other religions, and nowadays used as an epithet for profoundly evil people, namely liberals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In western art and popular culture the devil is used to represent evil influences or motivations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The word derives from the Hebrew &amp;quot;ha-satan&amp;quot;, meaning the &amp;quot;accuser&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;tempter&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;persecutor&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;calumniator&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;adversary&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
==Old Testament==&lt;br /&gt;
He was a member of the divine council of God referenced in the [[Old Testament]] and a key advisor to George W. Bush. He is referenced 11 times in [[Job]] and 4 other times in the Old Testament.  The [[New Testament]] mentions Satan 34 times in all starting with the first book [[Matthew]] and ending with the last [[Revelation]].  In the Christian tradition he rebelled against God and is now the enemy of God and man alike.  He is the father of lies and no good is found in him.  He leads a host of fallen angels (or [[demon]]s) who know their days are numbered before they will be cast in the [ake of fire and they seek to take as many humans as possible with them.  Those who worship Satan are called [[satanism | Satanists]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History==&lt;br /&gt;
In Christianity Satan's goal is to lead people away from the Republican party, by tempting or tricking them. The only sources of supernatural power in the world are from either God (good) or Satan (evil).  In the book of [[Genesis]], Satan takes the form of a snake and tempts Eve with fruit from a tree.  This causes sin to come into the world.  Kelly (2006) demonstrates how assumptions--such as the identification of the Eden serpent with Satan, probably first made by Justin Martyr in the second century--have hardened into fact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Satan, in the Book of Job, listens to God speak highly of Job and accuses Job to God before the host of angels that Job praises God only because he is blessed and would curse God if he was forced to suffer.  God allows Satan to do what he will except to spare his life, and Satan causes Job to suffer immensely.  (Job remained true to God through his hardships; Satan accused him further and punished him further, but could not get Job to break).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus]] makes references to demonic possession on multiple occasions that He then casts out.  Some believe that Satan is able to possess and control living humans on Earth even today. Even more, some others believe that Satan actually has done this in the past as well. The Catholic church believes that priests (and sometimes only bishops) are able to [[exorcise]] this possession through Jesus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[New Testament]], Satan tries to tempt [[Jesus]] in the desert, and fails.  Jesus warns extensively to beware of Satan as does [[Paul]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Names==&lt;br /&gt;
The notion of Satan, or an evil force, is noted in many if not all of the major world religions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Satan, is also called by several different names (the Devil, deceiver, Bealzebub, Beelzebul, Lucifer, Dis, [[Asmodeus]], Abaddon, &amp;quot;Old Scratch,&amp;quot; the Crooked One, etc).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Lucifer ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Lucifer''' is a name literally meaning &amp;quot;Son of the Morning&amp;quot; (or &amp;quot;Light-Bearer&amp;quot;), and is mentioned in the [[Bible]] only in the [[book of Isaiah]] (Isaiah 14:12). Though in Christian tradition Lucifer is equated with Satan, the immediate context of the passage is Isaiah's prophecy against the king of Babylon, and the name &amp;quot;Lucifer&amp;quot; was not present at all in the original manuscripts (in the Latin Vulgate, the phrase &amp;quot;Son of the Morning&amp;quot; was transliterated as a proper name).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whomever Lucifer may be, the Isaiah makes strong prophecy against him, condemning him for 5 pronouncements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* I will ascend into [[heaven]]&lt;br /&gt;
* I will exalt my throne above the stars of God&lt;br /&gt;
* I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north&lt;br /&gt;
* I will ascend above the heights of the clouds&lt;br /&gt;
* I will be like the most High&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those who take this passage to be a reference to Satan believe that it gives more history of what caused his downfall, that he was created by God as one of His most powerful angels (possibly a Seraphim), but that he fell from grace after he in his pride rebelled against his Creator. Some, however, believe that there is no grounding to interpret the passage as a history of Satan, citing that the passage uses highly figurative and poetic language that was meant as a prophecy against Babylon and nothing more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Paradise Lost 12.jpg|right|thumb|''The fall of Lucifer'' by Gustave Doré.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jewish Views ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Jewish tradition, Satan is an angel who faithfully serves God as a prosecuting attorney - one who accuses men of wickedness and impiety.  At the direction of God, Satan may be permitted to test these accusations, such as in Job.  In this view, Satan's goal is not to lead men away from their faithfulness to God, but merely to reveal the true depths of their devotion, although in [[I Chronicles]] 21:1 Satan provoked [[David]] to take a [[census]] of the people of Israel against the will of God and 70,000 men are slain because of it.&lt;br /&gt;
==Defenses==&lt;br /&gt;
The three classic defenses against Satan are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* mockery, which Satan cannot withstand due to his pride&lt;br /&gt;
* sunlight or exposure, from which Satan hides&lt;br /&gt;
* the [[Holy Spirit]], meaning &amp;quot;The Advocate&amp;quot; (i.e., defense lawyer), or the ''Armor of God''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ephesians 6:1-17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that Satan lacks self-restraint, which often leads him to failure.  In addition, Satan delights in [[deceit]], even to the point of causing his downfall.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dante and Milton==&lt;br /&gt;
The classic literary depictions of Satan appear in Dante's Italian poem, &amp;quot;Inferno,&amp;quot; and in [[John Milton]]'s English poem, &amp;quot;Paradise Lost.&amp;quot; These are considered the two greatest poems in Italian and English literature.&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Devil]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Salem Witch Trials]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Caldwell, William. &amp;quot;The Doctrine of Satan: I. In the Old Testament,&amp;quot; ''The Biblical World,'' Vol. 41, No. 1 (Jan., 1913), pp. 29-33 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3142352 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Caldwell, William. &amp;quot;The Doctrine of Satan: II. Satan in Extra-Biblical Apocalyptical Literature,&amp;quot; ''The Biblical World,'' Vol. 41, No. 2 (Feb., 1913), pp. 98-102 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3142425 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Caldwell, William. &amp;quot;The Doctrine of Satan: III. In the New Testament,&amp;quot; ''The Biblical World,'' Vol. 41, No. 3 (Mar., 1913), pp. 167-172 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3142755 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Empson, William. ''Milton's God'' (1966)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jacobs, Joseph, and Ludwig Blau. &amp;quot;Satan,&amp;quot; ''The Jewish Encyclopedia'' (1906) [http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=270&amp;amp;letter=S&amp;amp;search=Satan#ixzz0UQlw0zPS online] pp 68-71&lt;br /&gt;
* Kelly, Henry Ansgar. ''Satan: A Biography.'' (2006). 360 pp. [http://books.google.com/books?id=gPIpQg0lRbMC&amp;amp;pg=PA12&amp;amp;dq=intitle:satan+inauthor:kelly&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=3#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;f=false excerpt and text search]ISBN 0-521-60402-8, a study of the Bible and Western literature&lt;br /&gt;
* Kent, William. &amp;quot;Devil.&amp;quot; ''The Catholic Encyclopedia'' (1908)  Vol. 4. [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04764a.htm online older article]&lt;br /&gt;
* Osborne, B. A. E. &amp;quot;Peter: Stumbling-Block and Satan,&amp;quot; ''Novum Testamentum,'' Vol. 15, Fasc. 3 (Jul., 1973), pp. 187-190 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1560340 in JSTOR] on &amp;quot;Get thee behind me, Satan!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* Rebhorn Wayne A. &amp;quot;The Humanist Tradition and Milton's Satan: The Conservative as Revolutionary,&amp;quot; ''Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900,'' Vol. 13, No. 1, The English Renaissance (Winter, 1973), pp. 81-93 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/449871 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Russell, Jeffrey Burton. ''The Devil: Perceptions of Evil from Antiquity to Primitive Christianity''   (1987) [http://www.amazon.com/Devil-Perceptions-Antiquity-Christianity-Paperbacks/dp/0801494095/ref=pd_sim_b_1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Russell, Jeffrey Burton. ''Satan: The Early Christian Tradition'' (1987) [http://www.amazon.com/Satan-Christian-Jeffrey-Burton-Russell/dp/0801494133/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_c  excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Russell, Jeffrey Burton. ''Lucifer: The Devil in the Middle Ages'' (1986)   [http://www.amazon.com/Lucifer-Devil-Middle-Cornell-Paperbacks/dp/080149429X/ref=pd_sim_b_1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Russell, Jeffrey Burton. ''Mephistopheles: The Devil in the Modern World'' (1990) [http://www.amazon.com/Mephistopheles-Modern-Jeffrey-Burton-Russell/dp/0801497183/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_c excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Russell, Jeffrey Burton. ''The Prince of Darkness: Radical Evil and the Power of Good in History'' (1992) [http://www.amazon.com/Prince-Darkness-Radical-Power-History/dp/0801480566/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1255995689&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Schaff, D. S. &amp;quot;Devil&amp;quot; in ''New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge'' (1911), [[Mainline]] Protestant;  vol 3 pp 414-417 [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc03.d.iii.html online]&lt;br /&gt;
* Scott, Miriam Van. ''The Encyclopedia of Hell'' (1999) [http://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-Hell-Miriam-Van-Scott/dp/0312244428/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search] comparative religions; also popular culture&lt;br /&gt;
* Wray, T. J. and Gregory Mobley. ''The Birth of Satan: Tracing the Devil's Biblical Roots'' (2005) [http://www.amazon.com/Birth-Satan-Tracing-Devils-Biblical/dp/1403969337/ref=pd_sim_b_1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Abrahamic Religions]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DivineComedy}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Franzcarl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_Bible_Project&amp;diff=731269</id>
		<title>Conservative Bible Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservative_Bible_Project&amp;diff=731269"/>
		<updated>2009-12-14T18:25:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Franzcarl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:BIBLE.jpg|right]]{{ConservativeBible}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Conservative Bible Project''' is a project to render God's word into modern [[English]] while removing [[liberal]] distortions.  Beginners can pick any verse, type its citation into [http://www.blueletterbible.org/], click on &amp;quot;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;SHOW STRONG'S&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;quot; at the top right to obtain the Greek, and then make an edit here for all to review.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to John in the Bible, &amp;quot;I warn everyone who hears the prophetic words in this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words in this prophetic book, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city described in this book&amp;quot; (Revelation 22, 18-19).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberal [[bias]] has become the single biggest distortion in modern [[Bible]] translations.  There are three sources of errors in conveying biblical meaning are, in increasing amount:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*lack of precision in the original language, such as terms underdeveloped to convey new concepts introduced by Christ&lt;br /&gt;
*lack of precision in modern language&lt;br /&gt;
*translation bias, mainly of the liberal kind, in converting the original language to the modern one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Experts in ancient languages are helpful in reducing the first type of error above, which is a vanishing source of error as scholarship advances understanding.  English language linguists are helpful in reducing the second type of error, which also decreases due to an increasing vocabulary.  '''But the third -- and largest -- source of translation error requires conservative principles to reduce and eliminate'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The committee in charge of updating the bestselling version, the [[NIV]], is dominated by professors and higher-educated participants who can be expected to be [[liberal]] and [[feminist]] in outlook.  As a result, the revision and replacement of the [[NIV]] will be influenced more by [[political correctness]] and other [[liberal]] distortions than by genuine examination of the oldest manuscripts.  As a result of these political influences, it becomes desirable to develop a [[conservative]] translation that can serve, at a minimum, as a bulwark against the liberal manipulation of meaning in future versions.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of 2009, there is no fully conservative translation of the [[Bible]] which satisfies the following ten guidelines:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Additional less important guidelines include (1) adherence to a concise and dignifying style, such as use of &amp;quot;who&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; when referring to people and also use glorifying language for the remarkable achievements and (2) recognizing that Christianity introduced powerful new concepts that even the Greek and Hebrew were inadequate to express, but modern conservative language can express well.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Framework against Liberal Bias''': providing a strong framework that enables a thought-for-thought translation without corruption by liberal bias&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Not Emasculated''': avoiding unisex, &amp;quot;gender inclusive&amp;quot; language, and other feminist distortions; preserve many references to the unborn child (the [[NIV]] deletes these)&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Not Dumbed Down''': not dumbing down the reading level, or diluting the intellectual force and logic of Christianity; the [[NIV]] is written at only the 7th grade level&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[NIV]] has supplanted the [[KJV]] in popularity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:#'''Utilize Powerful Conservative Terms''': using powerful new [[Essay:Best New Conservative Terms|conservative terms]] to capture better the original intent;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, in 1611 the [[conservative]] concept of &amp;quot;accountability&amp;quot; had not yet developed, and the [[King James Version]] does not use &amp;quot;accountable to God&amp;quot; in translating Romans 3:19; good modern translations do.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Defective translations use the word &amp;quot;comrade&amp;quot; three times as often as &amp;quot;volunteer&amp;quot;; similarly, updating words that have a change in meaning, such as &amp;quot;word&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;peace&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;miracle&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Combat Harmful Addiction''': combating addiction&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Bible on Addiction]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by using modern terms for it, such as &amp;quot;gamble&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;cast lots&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the [[English Standard Version]] (2001) does not use the word &amp;quot;gamble&amp;quot; anywhere in translating numerous references to the concept in the [[Bible]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; using modern political terms, such as &amp;quot;register&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;enroll&amp;quot; for the census&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Accept the Logic of Hell''': applying logic with its full force and effect, as in not denying or downplaying the very real existence of [[Hell]] or the [[Devil]].&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Express Free Market Parables'''; explaining the numerous economic parables with their full free-market meaning&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Exclude Later-Inserted Inauthentic Passages''': excluding the interpolated passages that liberals commonly put their own spin on, such as the [[adulteress story]]&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Credit Open-Mindedness of Disciples''': crediting [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|open-mindedness]], often found in youngsters like the eyewitnesses Mark and John, the authors of two of the Gospels&lt;br /&gt;
:# '''Prefer Conciseness over Liberal Wordiness''': preferring conciseness to the liberal style of high word-to-substance ratio; avoid compound negatives and unnecessary ambiguities; prefer concise, consistent use of the word &amp;quot;Lord&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Yahweh&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Lord God.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, a project has begun among members of [[Conservapedia]] to translate the Bible in accordance with these principles.  The translated Bible can be found [[Conservative Bible|here]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Benefits include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*mastery of the Bible, which is priceless&lt;br /&gt;
*mastery of the English language, which is valuable&lt;br /&gt;
*thorough understanding of the differences in Bible translations, particularly the historically important [[King James Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*benefiting from activity that no [[public school]] would ever allow; a Conservative Bible could become a text for public school courses&lt;br /&gt;
*political issues can become a pathway to evangelizing liberals&lt;br /&gt;
*liberals will oppose this effort, but they will have to read the Bible to criticize this, and that will open their minds&lt;br /&gt;
*this project has a unifying effect on various [[Christian]] denominations, and serves as an important counterweight to liberal efforts to divide conservative candidates based on religion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How long would this project take?  There are about 8000 verses in the [[New Testament]].  At a careful rate of translating about four verses an hour, it would take one person 2000 hours, or about one year working full time on the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Possible Approaches ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are possible approaches to creating a conservative Bible translation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*identify faulty pro-liberal terms used in existing Bible translations, such as &amp;quot;government&amp;quot;, and suggest more accurate substitutes&lt;br /&gt;
*identify the omission of liberal terms for vices, such as &amp;quot;gambling&amp;quot;, and identify where they should be used&lt;br /&gt;
*identify conservative terms that are omitted from existing translations, and propose where they could improve the translation&lt;br /&gt;
*identify terms that have lost their original meaning, such as &amp;quot;word&amp;quot; in the beginning of the [[Gospel of John]], and suggest replacements, such as &amp;quot;truth&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An existing translation might license its version for improvement by the above approaches, much as several modern translations today are built on prior translations.  Alternatively, a more ambitious approach would be to start anew from the best available ancient transcripts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In stage one, the translation could focus on word improvement and thereby be described as a &amp;quot;conservative word-for-word&amp;quot; translation.  If greater freedom in interpretation is then desired, then a &amp;quot;conservative thought-for-thought&amp;quot; version could be generated as a second stage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Building on the [[King James Version]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States]] and much of the world, the immensely popular and respected [[King James Version]] (KJV) is freely available and in the [[public domain]].  It could be used as the baseline for developing a conservative translation without requiring a license or any fees.  Where the KJV is known to be deficient due to discovery of more authentic sources, exceptions can be made that use either more modern [[public domain]] translations as a baseline, or by using the original Greek or Hebrew.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 66 books in the [[KJV]], comprised of 1,189 chapters, 31,102 verses, and 788,280 words.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.biblebelievers.com/believers-org/kjv-stats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The project could begin with translation of the [[New Testament]], which is only 27 books, 260 chapters, 7,957 verses, and &lt;br /&gt;
less than 200,000 words.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Retranslation at rate of 20 verses a day would complete the entire [[New Testament]] in about a year.  With 5 good retranslators, that would be an average of only 4 verses a day per translator.  At a faster rate of 20 verses per day by 5 good translators, the entire [[New Testament]] could be retranslated in less than 3 months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== First Example - Liberal-Promoted Falsehood ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The earliest, most authentic manuscripts of the Gospel According to Luke lack this verse fragment set forth at the start of Luke 23:34:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=Luk&amp;amp;c=23&amp;amp;v=34&amp;amp;t=NIV#34 Quoted] here from the [[NIV]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Jesus said, &amp;quot;Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is this a corruption of the original, perhaps promoted by [[liberal]]s without regard to its authenticity?  This does not appear in any other Gospel, and the simple fact is that some of the persecutors of Jesus '''''did''''' know what they were doing.  This quotation is a favorite of liberals, although it does not appear in the earliest and best manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke. It should not appear in a [[conservative]] Bible, because in point of fact Jesus might never had said it at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Second Example - Dishonestly Shrewd ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Luke 16:8, the [[NIV]] describes an enigmatic parable in which the &amp;quot;master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly.&amp;quot;  But is &amp;quot;shrewdly&amp;quot;, which has connotations of dishonesty, the best term here?  Being dishonestly shrewd is not an admirable trait.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The better conservative term, which became available only in 1851, is &amp;quot;resourceful&amp;quot;.  The manager was praised for being &amp;quot;resourceful&amp;quot;, which is very different from dishonesty.  Yet not even the [[ESV]], which was published in 2001, contains a single use of the term &amp;quot;resourceful&amp;quot; in its entire translation of the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Third Example - Socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialistic terminology permeates English translations of the Bible, without justification.  This improperly encourages the &amp;quot;social justice&amp;quot; movement among Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, the conservative word &amp;quot;volunteer&amp;quot; is mentioned only once in the [[ESV]], yet the socialistic word &amp;quot;comrade&amp;quot; is used three times, &amp;quot;laborer(s)&amp;quot; is used 13 times, &amp;quot;labored&amp;quot; 15 times, and &amp;quot;fellow&amp;quot; (as in &amp;quot;fellow worker&amp;quot;) is used 55 times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Advantages to a Conservative Bible Online ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several striking advantages to a conservative approach to translating the Bible online:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* participants learn enormously from the process&lt;br /&gt;
* liberal bias - and lack of authenticity - become easier to recognize and address&lt;br /&gt;
* by translating online, this utilizes the growing online resources that improve accuracy&lt;br /&gt;
* supported by conservative principles, the project can be bolder in uprooting and excluding liberal distortions&lt;br /&gt;
* the project can adapt quickly to future threats from liberals to biblical integrity&lt;br /&gt;
* access is free and immediate to the growing internet audience, for their benefit&lt;br /&gt;
* the ensuing debate would flesh out -- and stop -- the infiltration of churches by liberals pretending to be Christian, much as a vote by legislators exposes the liberals&lt;br /&gt;
* this would bring the Bible to a new audience of political types, for their benefit; Bible courses in college Politics Departments would be welcome&lt;br /&gt;
* this would debunk the pervasive and hurtful myth that Jesus would be a political liberal today&lt;br /&gt;
* an unbiased and truthful Bible is of immeasurable value to society&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Bible]] (includes links to specific books)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.greekbible.com/ Nestle-Aland 26th edition Greek Bible (the source for all modern translations except the [[NKJV]]])  &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/e/ets/efts/Greek.html Liddell-Scott-Jones Greek Lexicon and Woodhouse's English-Greek Dictionary]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bible Translations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bible Translation Issues]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bible Retranslation Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Word Analysis of Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[NIV]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Feminist Bible]] (disfavored here)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible Versions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservative Bible]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Franzcarl</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible&amp;diff=731263</id>
		<title>Bible</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bible&amp;diff=731263"/>
		<updated>2009-12-14T18:18:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Franzcarl: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:800px-Crop Book of Isaiah 2006-06-06.jpg|thumb|300px|right|The Holy Bible, opened to the Book of Isaiah.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Bible}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Bible''', or the '''Holy Scriptures''', is the collection of texts sacred to [[Judaism]] and [[Christianity]], and consists of two parts: the thirty-nine books of the Jewish faith known as the '''Tanakh''', or the [[Old Testament]], to which additional books are recognized by [[Christians]]; and the twenty-seven books and letters of the [[New Testament]] of the Christian faith.  Originally written in [[Hebrew]], Aramaic, and Greek, the Bible has been translated in more than two thousand languages; in terms of sales and distribution the Bible is the most-widely distributed, largest-selling book in history;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; The Bible continues to be the best-selling book ever. Americans alone buy 25 million Bibles a year, according to Publisher's Weekly. Bible sales are now reaching $609 million a year, with specialty Bibles available for myriad &amp;quot;niche&amp;quot; audiences, from motorcycle riders to campers, brides and archaeologists. &amp;quot;Immerse,&amp;quot; a water-resistant Bible for troops overseas, is now available from publisher Bardin &amp;amp; Marsee. [http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070529-111815-7952r.htm Polls: Most believe Bible as God's word] - Jennifer Harper, ''The Washington Times'' - May 30, 2007] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
the over-all influence and impact the Bible has had on literature, culture, and history is beyond calculation.  Most [[Christians]], Protestant and Catholic, agree on the 27 books of the [[New Testament]], but the Protestant Bible includes 39 books of the [[Old Testament]] while the Catholic Bible includes an extra 7 books, for a total of 73.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Catholic Bible includes these books that are not included in the Protestant Bible:  &lt;br /&gt;
# The Wisdom of Solomon&lt;br /&gt;
# Tobit&lt;br /&gt;
# Sirach&lt;br /&gt;
# Judith&lt;br /&gt;
# 1st Maccabees&lt;br /&gt;
# 2nd Maccabees&lt;br /&gt;
# Baruch [http://www.catholicbible101.com/theholybible.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Protestant Bible has 593,493 words in the Old Testament and 181,253 words in the New Testament.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christiananswers.net/bible/about.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Name==&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;Bible&amp;quot; had its origins in an ancient [[Phoenicia]]n seaport called [[Byblos]], which was so-named as a result of the trade and manufacture of writing material based on the [[papyrus]] or byblos reed, used extensively in antiquity for making [[scroll]]s and [[book]]s.  The [[Greek language|Greek]] word ''biblos'' was based upon this, and it came to be the word for ''book'' (a small book was termed ''biblion''), and by the 2nd century A.D. Greek [[Christianity|Christians]] had called the Scriptures ''ta Biblia'' ('''τα βιβλία''' ''the books''), which was transferred to [[Latin]] by dropping the ''ta''; the word made its way to [[Old French]] where the plural was dropped in favor of the singular, hence becoming the [[English]] word ''Bible''. (Unger, pg 143; Moulton; Blass)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Books of the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
===The Old Testament===&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;right&amp;quot; cellpadding=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; cellspacing=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;360&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;margin-left:5px&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: tan  no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Old Testament layout&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Jewish&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Christian&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Genesis&lt;br /&gt;
|Genesis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Exodus&lt;br /&gt;
|Exodus&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Leviticus&lt;br /&gt;
|Leviticus&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Numbers&lt;br /&gt;
|Numbers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Deuteronomy&lt;br /&gt;
|Deuteronomy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joshua&lt;br /&gt;
|Joshua&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|Judges&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kings&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Isaiah&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezekiel&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Kings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|The Minor Prophets&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Kings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Psalms&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Chronicles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Proverbs&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Chronicles&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Job&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezra&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Song of Songs&lt;br /&gt;
|Nehemiah&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruth&lt;br /&gt;
|Esther&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lamentations&lt;br /&gt;
|Job&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ecclesiastes&lt;br /&gt;
|Psalms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ester&lt;br /&gt;
|Proverbs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|Ecclesiastes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezra&lt;br /&gt;
|Song of Solomon&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chronicles&lt;br /&gt;
|Isaiah&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Lamentations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezekiel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|The Minor Prophets&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: black; height: 30px; background: tan no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Dates of each Book&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|Old Testament&lt;br /&gt;
!align =&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;color: white; height: 30px; background: navy no-repeat scroll top left;&amp;quot;|New Testament&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Genesis, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Matthew, A.D. 60-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Exodus, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Mark, A.D. 60-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Leviticus, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Luke, A.D. 58-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Numbers, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|John, A.D. 95&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Deuteronomy, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Acts, A.D. 58-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joshua, 1400-1360 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Romans, A.D. 58&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Judges, c. 1020 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Corinthians, A.D. 57&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruth, c. 1090 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Corinthians, A.D. 57&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|Galatians, A.D. 56&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Samuel&lt;br /&gt;
|Ephesians, A.D. 62-63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Kings, 609-600 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Philippians, A.D. 58-60&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Kings, 609-600 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Colosians, A.D. 61-63&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Chronicles, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Thessalonians, A.D. 52&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Chronicles, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Thessalonians, A.D. 53&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezra, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Timothy, A.D. 62-65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nehemiah, c. 400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Timothy, A.D. 65-66&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Esther, 464-425 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Titus, A.D. 65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Job, 1440-1400 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Philemon, A.D. 65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Psalms, 1004-965 B.C. &lt;br /&gt;
|Hebrews, A.D. 63-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Proverbs, 965-925 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|James, A.D. 63-64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eccleisiastes, 965-925 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st Peter, A.D. 64&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Song of Solomon, 965-925 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd Peter, A.D. 65&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Isaiah, 785-697 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|1st John, A.D. 90-100&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jeremiah, 587-538 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|2nd John, A.D. 90-100&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lamentations, 587-538 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|3rd John, A.D. 90-100&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ezekiel, 592-572 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Jude, c. A.D. 70-75&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Daniel, 539-520 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|Revelation, A.D. 96-98&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hosea, 753-731 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joel, 835-796 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Amos, 787-747 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Obadiah, 848-841 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jonah, 771-754 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Micah, 715-687 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Nahum, 661-612 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Habbakuk, 625-608 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Zephaniah, 621-608 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Haggai, 520 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Zechariah, 520 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Malachi, 455 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Old Testament]], also called the Hebrew Bible or Tanakh, consists of thirty-nine books, most of them, if not all, being allegorical in nature. The books themselves were originally written in [[Hebrew]], and later on in the [[Aramaic]] language of Palestine; the Greek language version written after the conquest of [[Alexander the Great]] is known as the [[Septuagint]].  [[Melito]], a bishop of [[Sardis]] in [[Lydia]] (in what is now [[Turkey]]), is said to have coined the phrase ''Old Testament'' about A.D. 170.  The Old Testament is divided in three parts (hence, &amp;quot;Tanakh&amp;quot;) within the Jewish community: the [[Torah]] (&amp;quot;Law&amp;quot;), or [[Pentateuch]], the five books of [[Moses]]; [[Nevi'im]] (&amp;quot;Prophets&amp;quot;), and [[Ketuvim]] (&amp;quot;Writings,” or [[Hagiographa]]). Here the arrangement of the books differs somewhat from the Old Testament as used by Christians, however the actual writing of each book remains the same. The Christian order of the the books of the Bible follow the Chronology of the events and the personages being related, while in the Jewish order, though there is a chronological framework, the order follows more the importance, influence, &amp;quot;weight of usage&amp;quot; within Judaism. Thus, for orthodox Judaism, The Torah of Moses (the 5 books of Moses) come first, and are the most authoritative of all Scripture. Under the Pharasaic theory that the Moses was given the Oral law explicating how the written law was to be applied, at the same time as he was given the written law contained in the Bible, and that oral law passed on through the generations, the Mishna and the Gemara composing the Talmud is equally authoritative with the Torah of Moses. Then the Prophets come next in authority. But the Prophets are broader than considered by the Christian ordering. The Prophets do include what Christians call the Former and the Latter, or the Major and the Minor prophets, but it also includes what Christinns consider History - such as the books of the Kings. The last in authority for every day life of the Jew in terms of &amp;quot;regulation&amp;quot;, actually form  a great influence in the Synagogue worship - the Writings, with a heavy emphasis on the Psalms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Torah====&lt;br /&gt;
The Five books of Moses, in their Hebrew and English names:&lt;br /&gt;
*Bereisheet (&amp;quot;in the beginning&amp;quot;), or [[Genesis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Shemot (“names”), or [[Exodus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Vayikra (“and God called”), or [[Leviticus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Bemidbar (“in the Wilderness”), or [[Numbers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Devarim (“words”), or [[Deuteronomy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first eleven chapters of ''Genesis'' provide the account of the [[Creation]], the history of God's early relationship with humanity, and the [[Deluge]] of [[Noah]]. The remaining thirty-nine chapters detail the account of God's covenant with the early Hebrew nation, led by the patriarchs [[Abraham]], [[Isaac]] and [[Jacob]] (or Israel), and one of Jacob's children, [[Joseph]]. It tells the beginnings of God's chosen people, of how God commanded Abraham to leave his family and home to settle in the land of [[Canaan]], and how the Children of Israel later moved to Egypt.  The remainder of the Torah, beginning with ''Exodus'', tells the story of the great Hebrew leader [[Moses]], and of the Hebrews through their sojourn and slavery in Egypt, their escape from bondage, and their wanderings in the desert until they finally enter the Promised Land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Nevi'im====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Nevi'im]] (&amp;quot;Prophets&amp;quot;) is the story of the rise toward, and ultimately reaching, the Hebrew monarchy; the sad period of anarchy and revolt leading to the division into the two kingdoms of Judah and Israel; and the prophets who judged the kings of both in God's name. It ends with the conquest of both kingdoms and the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. The Minor Prophets are considered a single book in the Nevi'um; in Christianity they have been split into twelve separate books and named for their authors.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joshua (Biblical book)|Joshua]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Judges (Biblical book)|Judges]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[I Samuel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[II Samuel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[I Kings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[II Kings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Isaiah (Biblical book)|Isaiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jeremiah (Biblical book)|Jeremiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ezekiel (Biblical book)|Ezekiel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Minor Prophets]] &lt;br /&gt;
**[[Hosea (Biblical book)|Hosea]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Joel (Biblical book)|Joel]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Amos (Biblical book)|Amos]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Obadiah (Biblical book)|Obadiah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Jonah (Biblical book)|Jonah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Micah (Biblical book)|Micah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Nahum (Biblical book)|Nahum]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Habakkuk (Biblical book)|Habakkuk]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zephaniah (Biblical book)|Zephaniah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Haggai (Biblical book)|Haggai]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Zechariah (Biblical book)|Zechariah]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Malachi (Biblical book)|Malachi]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Ketuvim====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ketuvim]], or &amp;quot;Writings,&amp;quot; contain lyrical poetry, philosophical reflections on life, and the writings of the prophets and other Jewish leaders during the exile in [[Babylon]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Psalms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Proverbs]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Book of Job]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Song of Songs]], also called [[Song of Solomon]] in the Christian Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Book of Ruth]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lamentations]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ecclesiastes]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Esther]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Daniel (Biblical book)|Daniel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Ezra]], divided into the two books of Ezra and [[Nehemiah]] in the Christian Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Books of Chronicles]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[David]] has been named as the author of the ''Psalms''; [[Solomon]] is believed to have written ''Song of Songs'' in his youth, the ''Proverbs'' in his prime, and ''Ecclesiastes'' during his old age.  The prophet [[Jeremiah]] is thought to have written the aptly-named ''Lamentations'' at the beginning of the exile in Babylon. The ''Book of Ruth'' is the only biblical book that centers entirely on a non-Jew, a [[Moabite]] who married a Jew and became an ancestor of both David and [[Jesus Christ]]. ''Esther'' is unique as it is the only book in the Bible not to mention God.  [[Moses]] is considered to be the author of ''Job''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The melodies of the Old Testament===&lt;br /&gt;
The Hebrew of the present day Old Testament is composed of the Hebrew consonents and, added on at a later stage, the vowels. Along with these two elements, other signs were added which indicated the melodies that were sung along with the words or phrases. Some of the signs were positioned above the individual consonents, some below, and some to the side. Some of these melody signs were associated with others providing a musical pattern that corresponds with the opening of a thought, similar to the beginning of a sentence (ex. &amp;quot;merkha&amp;quot;), the continuation of a thought (ex. &amp;quot;munakh&amp;quot;), tying in one word with the following, as one melody flowed into the next, the &amp;quot;resting&amp;quot; or completion of a thought, much in &amp;quot;the same way that a comma (ex. &amp;quot;azla&amp;quot;), though not ending a sentence, makes for the &amp;quot;semi&amp;quot;-ending or minor completion of a thought, a major break in the run of thoughts (&amp;quot;etnachta&amp;quot;), though  the run of thought would be resumed until the major completion (&amp;quot;sof pasuq&amp;quot;), much in the same way the a period brings to a stop and a completion as a sentence ends. Thus the musical signs in the Hebrew text also provide an interpretion of the text current to the times in which the signs were incorporated as part of the text. The signs that tie one word to another providing one thought are called &amp;quot;conjunctive&amp;quot; signs and the signs that separate words and the thought of them are called &amp;quot;disjuctive&amp;quot;. An example of the use of these signs to interprete the Hebrew text is the well known prophesy of the One to come. The Hebrew letters can either be understood to read &amp;quot;His name shall be called Wonderful counsellor of the mighty God&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;His name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God.&amp;quot; The melody signs (called in Hebrew &amp;quot;Ta'mei HaMikra) decide for the latter. After &amp;quot;Wonderful&amp;quot; there is a disjuctive, after &amp;quot;Counsellor&amp;quot; there is a disjuctive, and after &amp;quot;Mighty&amp;quot; (but adj. after the noun in Hebrew order) there is a conjunctive. It is possible to reconstruct to some extent the melody and the interpretation of the Old Testament current in the first century and therefore the melody and the interpretation of Jesus Himself. This is because of the following: the present day melodies of the various dispersions of the Jews are to a great extent different one from the other. Some of these dispersions are the Ashkenazi, representing the Jews exiled from Israel by the Romans in 70 A.D. and then on to the Rhine Valley,and then onto parts of Eastern Europe, Western Europe, America, etc. the Sephardim who saw the beginnings of their disperion from Spain in the 15th Century and then on to Greece, Turkey, North Aftrica. Holland, and America, the Yemenites, the Bnei Israel of India, the Jews of Ethiopia, etc. etc, Yet, with the diversity in melodies of the Scriptures, there are certain features which are either identical or strikingly similar. Musicologist, Joel Segal, pointed out over 40 years ago, that that could only have been possible if these dispersions were at one time together in the same place. The only time that all these dispersions were together in the same place was prior to the great dispersion of the first century and the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Old Testament Apocrypha===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Apocrypha]] was written during the four hundred years between the last book of the Old Testament and the birth of Christ.  The term itself comes from the Greek word ''apokruphos'' (&amp;quot;hidden&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;concealed&amp;quot;), and although they have an actual history and literary value, the fourteen books which make up the Apocrypha have been rejected as canonical by both the Jewish faith and most denominations of the Christian church due to historical, geographical, or literal inaccuracies; the teaching of doctrines which contradict inspired Scripture; and a lack of elements and structure which give genuine Scripture its unique characteristic (Unger, pg. 70). The Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches, among others, include the Apocrypha in their versions of the Bible, considering them to be canonical.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Apocryphal books had been used in both Israel and Egypt and are part of the Old Testament in the Greek language used by Jews all over the Greek speaking world - particularly Alexandria, Egypt. This version is called the Septuaginta. The Septuaginta fell into disuse among Jews for two reasons - 1. Greek speaking Christians were using the Septuaginta in their efforts to bring Jews to faith in Jesus Christ 2. A number of the Apocryphal books were also apocalyptic, that is, focusing on the last days, the KIngdom of God in battle against the kingdoms of this world and the downfall of this world's empires. This was considered dangerous and liable to provoke Rome against the Jews. Alternative Greek translations to the Septuaginta, which was considered &amp;quot;loose&amp;quot;, were adopted by the Rabbis. These were the translations of three proselytes to Judaism, Theodosious, Aquillas, and Symmachus. The Jewish Rabbinic &amp;quot;Council&amp;quot; of Jamnia (Yavneh on the Mediterraenian coast of Israel) in 90 A.D., under the leadership of Rabban Yochanan ben Zakkai, effectively excluded the Apocraphal books (along with the Septuaginta) from the Jewish Canon by requiring, for a book to be considered canonical, that it have been written in Hebrew (and Aramaic). Actually, a number of the apocryphal books, or portions thereof,  had been written originally in Hebrew, most notably, the Book of Ben Sirach (Ecclesiasticus) found in Hebrew at Qumran with the rest of the Dead Sea Scrolls, but this was unknown to Yohanan Ben Zakkai and the Council of Jamnia in the first century. Under the impetus of Renaissance learning, Protestant scholars, now able to translate the Bible directly from the original languages of Hebrew and Greek, instead of having to go through the Latin Vulgate, went directly to the Hebrew text. But this was the Hebrew text (eventually to be called the &amp;quot;Massoretic text&amp;quot;) of the canon of books that had been authorized by the Council of Jamnia. In this way, most Protestant churches came to not include the Apocryphal books in their Canon of Scripture.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are the books which are most frequently referred to by the title ''Apocrypha'':&lt;br /&gt;
*[[1 Esdras]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2 Esdras]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[1 Maccabees]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[2 Maccabees]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Tobit]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Judith]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Wisdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ecclesiasticus]], also known as Sirach&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Book of Baruch]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Epistle of Jeremiah]] is sometimes listed as separate book or the last chapter of Baruch &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Prayer of Manasseh]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Greek language additions to the [[Book of Esther]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additions to the book of Daniel&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Prayer of Azariah and Song of the Three Holy Children]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Story of Susanna]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bel and the Dragon]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between 90-95 A.D. the Jewish [[Council of Jamnia]] revised the canon of the Old Testament, ensuring that the books involved conformed to the Torah, were written in the Hebrew language, written in Palestine, and written before 400 B.C.  As a result, the Apocrypha was removed from the canon. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://agards-bible-timeline.com/q2_bible_english.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The New Testament===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[New Testament]] is a collection of twenty-seven books and letters, written by the early Christian community, and written primarily in [[Greek]]. The emphasis of the New Testament is the life, teachings, and gift of salvation from the central figure of the whole work, Jesus of Nazareth.  These books are grouped into the following:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
====[[Gospels|The Gospels]]====&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Gospels'' contain the history of Jesus.  The ''Acts of the Apostles'' are a continuance of the Gospels, documenting the history of the early church, beginning immediately following Jesus' death and resurrection.  Of the authors, only Matthew and John had met Jesus; they were among His disciples during His earthly ministry.  Mark was a companion of Peter, and his gospel was the first to be written down, about A.D. 50.  Luke is considered the author of both his gospel and the ''Acts''.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of Matthew]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of Mark]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of Luke]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gospel of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Acts of the Apostles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[[Pauline Epistles]]====&lt;br /&gt;
The Pauline Epistles are letters (epistles) written to early Christian communities written by the [[Apostle Paul]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Romans]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle to the Corinthians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle to the Corinthians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Galatians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Philippians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to Philemon]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle to the Thessalonians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle to the Thessalonians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Ephesians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to the Colossians]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle to Timothy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle to Timothy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle to Titus]]&lt;br /&gt;
*''Possibly the [[Epistle to the Hebrews]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]] Bible scholarship over the last two centuries has denied that Paul wrote Ephesians, 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus; and doubted that he wrote Colossians and 2 Thessalonians.  However, all the epistles listed above except Hebrews say they are written by Paul.  As they are authoritative Scripture which &amp;quot;cannot lie&amp;quot;, their claims should be believed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is speculation that Paul may have written the ''Epistle to the Hebrews'', which does not mention an author; however, it could easily have been written by any early Christian except for Timothy, who is mentioned by name in the final chapter.  The controversy, however, does not affect the genuineness of the epistle. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Unger, pg. 748; Eusebius ''The History of the Church'' 3:3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====[[General Epistles]]====&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle of James]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle of Peter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle of Peter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[First Epistle of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Second Epistle of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Third Epistle of John]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Epistle of Jude]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Revelation====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Book of Revelation]] is the last work in the New Testament as well as the whole Bible, written close to A.D. 100 by the [[Apostle John]] during his exile on the Greek island of [[Patmos]]. Revelation is concerned with the condition of the [[Seven Churches of Asia]] before going deeply into a description of the [[Last Days]] prior to the beginning of the [[Millennial Age]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most [[Fundamentalism|Fundamentalists]] hold to &amp;quot;[[Dispensationalism]]&amp;quot;, a theory of the meaning of Revelations and other prophecies that was developed in the 19th century and is summarized in the ''Scofield Reference Bible'' (1909, 1917).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Non-uniformity of language and style of original Scriptures==&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Old Testament and the New Testament, in the original languages of Hebrew (and Aramaic) and Greek, exhibit a non uniformity of style and language. This is in sharp contrast to most modern translations which treat the Scriptures throughout as if it was one book instead the many books they are. Modern translations can be erudite, dignified, folksy and common, clear and geared for the &amp;quot;common man&amp;quot;, or replete with language resonant with literary associations for the &amp;quot;accomplished&amp;quot; reader.  But they are that way througout. The Biblical originals, on the other hand, for example in the Hebrew, have imbedded within narrative of one period, as the narrative of the deeds of the prophets Debora, a similar poetic recounting in a much more ancient and even archaic Hebrew, probably emanating from a chant from the time of Deborah herself. The same with the narrative and poetic portions concerning Moses. There are even different Hebrew languages from the same period but different authors, having come from different origins and cultural levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the New Testament, an example of non-uniformity can be found in the stark differences of languages in the Gospel of Luke, written by Luke the physician. The early accounts, those concerning the birth of Jesus and early life, are written in a stilted and often crude Greek while the rest of the Gospel is written in fine Greek befitting of the background and ability of a learned physician. But when the stilted and crude Greek is retranslated, word for word and phrase for phrase, into the Hebrew current in the first century in most parts of Israel, it becomes excellent Hebrew - Mishnaic Hebrew. This is because of the intent and fastidiousness of Luke, who derived his material, as he says,  from people that had been &amp;quot;on the scene&amp;quot; , and his success in transmitting it faithfully as he had received it. Both the Old and New Testaments, for various reasons, exhibit little or no concern to &amp;quot;level through&amp;quot; or override the content of what they are saying by stylistic considerations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inspiration===&lt;br /&gt;
The Old Testament was written by God. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apostle [[Paul]] wrote that &amp;quot;All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness&amp;quot; (2 Timothy 3:16).&lt;br /&gt;
Similarly the apostle [[Saint Peter|Peter]] wrote, &amp;quot;Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet's own interpretation. For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit&amp;quot; (2 Peter 1:20-21).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Formation of New Testament and Jewish technical transmission====&lt;br /&gt;
In the first century and prior, the ear was more important than the eye, as far as retaining in memory. Jews would receive orally, that is, from hearing, the laws that they believed originated with Moses and then passed them on to others, down through the generations.It was important to link the present rabbis by names who taught it with the rabbis by name who had passed it on to them, on back as far as possible to Moses on Mt. Sinai. This was the startling difference of Jesus.  By saying &amp;quot;You have heard it said, but I say unto you...&amp;quot; , He was by-passing Moses and the others after and getting His teaching direct from the Father. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This Jewish way of receiving (QBL) and handing on (MSR) is summed up in the lead saying of the &amp;quot;Ethics of the Fathers&amp;quot;  tractate of the [[Mishna]], &amp;quot;Moses received Torah from God at Sinai. He transmitted it to Joshua, Joshua to the elders, the elders to the prophets, the prophets to the members of the Great Assembly [Sanhedrin] (1:1).&amp;quot;  The teaching thus transmitted was memorized word for word by groups of disciples (Talmidim) together, thereby minimizing, by the common knowledge and plublic repetitions, all innovations and errors, though there might well have been &amp;quot;stylizing&amp;quot; for ease of retention and recall. receiving and handing on (transmission), receiving and handing on. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This methodology, with its technical Hebrew terminology appears in the New Testament with the same technical meaning and purpose, for how the earliest Christian teaching was carried on prior to the formation of the New Testament and during the time of its formation. This ensured the validity of the teaching and its authenticity going back, not to Moses, but to the time of Jesus Himself. &amp;quot;For I handed over  (Gk. pare'doka, Heb. MSR) to you at the first what I also received (Gk. pare'labon, Heb. QBL) that Christ died for our sins, according to the Scriptures, and that He was raised on the third day, according to the Scriptures...&amp;quot; l Cor. 15:3. Paul knew all of the &amp;quot;deposit of faith&amp;quot; three ways, in the usual &amp;quot;collaborative&amp;quot; way of God - from Scriptures (the Old Testament), from experience (seeing the living Christ on the road to Damascas), and from authenticated oral tradition/transmission involving &amp;quot;receiving&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;handing on&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Authority of Bible in religious communities==&lt;br /&gt;
The role of the Bible in the life of differing communities varies widely by both the inner tenents of the community and the outer influences bearing on the community. &lt;br /&gt;
===Judaism===&lt;br /&gt;
Orthodox Judaism through the centuries, while it was only marginally affected by growing secularization and modern learning, held to a &amp;quot;differing level of  level of authority&amp;quot; understanding of the authority of the Hebrew Bible. This did not imply a different level of inspiration, but rather that importance to the regulation of life was prime for the Torah of Moses, the 5 books of the Law. But the Pharasaic teaching also posited an Oral Law given to Moses by God that was passed on through the centuries through Joshua, the prophets, pairs of Rabbis, until this day.  The Oral law is found in the Talmud (Mishna and the Gemara together) The oral law became the decisive interpreter, teacher and regulator of the Written Law and determined the course of Jewish Orthodox life. The second section of the Old Testament, the Prophets, is known to the Jewish Community primarily through the synagogue readings of the prophets, the Haftorah, that are assigned to conclude the weekly reading of the Law. The Psalms, the most formative of all  the Writings, besides being common throughout the synagogue services, are used in various devotional prayer contexts. Orthodox Judaism has little been affected by modern Higher Criticism of the Bible. Reformed Judaism, originally developed in Germany, and Conservative Judaism, to a lesser extent, have been greatly affected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Mainline Protestants===&lt;br /&gt;
Mainline Protestantism, represented in the major churches and their seminaries, has greatly been affected by &amp;quot;modernism&amp;quot; based on advanced scholarly research, especially from Germany in the 19th century. The &amp;quot;Higher Criticism&amp;quot; ignored God's participation in the production of Scripture. Prime among these theories is the Documentary theory of  Penteteuch  origins (Wellhausen- Graff) that posit that Moses wrote little or nothing, Instead the Bible originated in four sources coming from various periods. These are sources are termed J (for the use of &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; for the name of God), E (for the use of &amp;quot;Elohim&amp;quot;), P (priestly), and D (Deutoronomic). The spirit of the New Testament is far more important than the text of either Testament for modern Protestant theology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Orthodox Jewish critique of Documentary theory====  &lt;br /&gt;
Jewish Orthodox scholars have pointed to flaws of the Documentary Hypothesis. For instance, Orthodox Jewish Scholar Cassuto  has pointed out that rather than the names for God varying according to author and period, they vary according to emphasis from the same period, that of Moses - &amp;quot;Jehovah&amp;quot; being used for the God in his dealing with His covenental people Israel, and &amp;quot;Elohim&amp;quot; being use when His dealing with mankind are emphasis. Likewise the two terms usually translated &amp;quot;making a covenant&amp;quot;, lkhrot brit (to &amp;quot;cut&amp;quot; a covenant) and lehaqim brit (to &amp;quot;raise&amp;quot; a covenenat) are not from two sources but mean different things - to initiate a covenant and to fulfill a covenant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evangelical Protestants===&lt;br /&gt;
Evangelical Protestantism belives strongly in the divine inspiration and inerrancy of the whole Bible and has been the most receptive of Biblical Authority. Believing in full inspiration of the all Scripture does not mean to evangelicalism equal importance of all Scriptures for the healthy growth of the Christian community. This is because Evangelicalism, following Scripture's own understanding, believes in progressive revelation throughout Biblical time, culminating in Jesus Christ, and no further (thus obviating the role of Tradition). Thus Evangelicalism, does not hold to the application of Mosaic Legislation, and other biblical elements that Orthodox Judaism holds to. This applies to faith and to morals. The Mosaic regulation on executing a rebellious child does not present a problem to evangelical thought as, according to Paul and Hebrews, the Law has been rendered obsolete by the New Covenant. The Destruction of the Temple and the place for sacrifice of all kinds, present no problem for evangelicalism, as they did for Judasim, as Christ's sacrifice on the cross has now &amp;quot;fulfilled&amp;quot; the proscriptions of the Law and the ceremonials attached. Thus there is a sort of Levels of Authority understanding for evangelicalism similar (but for different reasons)  to the levels of authority of Judaism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evangelical Churches vigorously promote the reading of Scripture through Sunday sermons and Bible study programs. Emphasis is placed on &amp;quot;each one understanding&amp;quot;. Coupled with American individualism, and lack of tradional vehicles of authority, this sometimes leads to spinterring and each man's interpretation &amp;quot;is as good as any other&amp;quot;. Nevertheless, the &amp;quot;Fiundamentals&amp;quot; defined in 1910 are strongly retained by the Evangelical Churches - the divinity of Christ, His death for sins and Resurrection from the dead, His second coming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Eastern Orthodox===&lt;br /&gt;
The Orthodox Churches througout the world, whether of Greek, Russian, Rumanian, the various middle eastern varieties, emphasis the synod (Council) of Bishops, basis on the example of the &amp;quot;Council&amp;quot; of Jerusalem in the book of Acts, as the God authorized agent of interpretation and application of the Scriptures. Understanding that Jesus' words, &amp;quot; He (the Holy Spirit) wil lead you into all truth&amp;quot;, Orthodoxy believes that the synod of bishops, none of whom are individually infallible, are given guidance from the Holy Spirit so that the Scriptures are rightly applied to the Christian Community enabling the Church to never stray from Christ. That is, the Church is given &amp;quot;indefectability&amp;quot;. A minority Orthodox Church thought  holds to &amp;quot;infallibility&amp;quot; in synodal decision rather than or instead of &amp;quot;indefectability&amp;quot;. Scripture in the Orthodox churches are butressed by creedal formulations, the decisions of belief of past synods, and are less susceptible to the modern Higher Criticism. The Resurrection of Christ, virgin birth, return of Christ from Heaven to Earth, are all part and parcel of these churches. Individual interpretation of Scripture and manner of life are limited then by the teaching authority (the magisterium) granted to the Epsicopate - the Synod of bishops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Roman Catholic===&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman Catholic Church, like the Orthodox Churches have a strong sense of the Authority given to the Bishops by Christ to teach, interpret, defend the Faith and therefore to exercise the responsibility to interprete Scripture to the Faithful. But since Vatican ll, there has been an increased effort to bring Scripture knowledge to the laity and now there has been an increase of Scripture reading and study programs throughout most sections of the Church. This as been abetted by the Catholic Charismatic movement which has had the effect of promoting individual appropriation of the gifts and graces of the Holy Spirit and with that, the devotional and intellectual use of  Holy Scriptures. However, the role of &amp;quot;Majesterium&amp;quot;, that is the Teaching Authority, strongly sets limits to individual interpretation. The Roman Catholic church understands that though the Majesterium is given to all the bishops, the definitive exercise is limited to one bishop - the bishop ov Rome, the Pope. Further, it is believed that the Pope, when declaring dogma (teaching) ex-Cathedra (from the chair) speaks infaillibly (on matters of faith and morals). The first time the Pope has promulgated dogma ex-cathedra was to promulgate the doctrine itself of Papal Infallibility. The Pope , through the Vatican prelates and all the bishops can regulate much of Catholic community life, and some of the regualtion based on the interpretation of Scripture or the application of interporetation of Scripture. An example of this is the prohibition of abortion. The Church has accepted most of the modern Higher Critical methodology of Scripture, including the Documentary theory of origins first developed within German Protestantism. But the effects of this on the tenents of the Christian Faith  are much mitigated due to the creedal affirmations of the Church developed centuries ago and Papal authority. This the Roman Catholic Church does not waver on the Deity of Christ, the Trinity, the death and resurrection of Christ, and the second comming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Evangelical Understanding of the History of the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
Rejecting the &amp;quot;Higher Criticism&amp;quot; accepted by the mainline Protestant denominations, Evangelicals and many Catholics hold to a more traditional history of the Bible.  This section summarizes their views.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gospel of Luke in Arab.gif|thumb|This tenth-century Egyptian codex was donated to Pope Eugenius IV by the Coptic delegates at the Council of Ferrara-Florence. Translated from a Coptic original, it is one of the earliest Arabic versions of any part of the New Testament, none of which can be dated before the late eighth or ninth centuries.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oldest books of the Bible are certainly the five books of the Torah and ''Job''.  In ''1st Kings'' 6:1, Solomon is stated to have begun building the Temple &amp;quot;''in the 480th year after the children of Israel were come up out of the land of Egypt''&amp;quot;.  It had been established by scholars and historians that Solomon had begun building the Temple in the fourth year of his reign, or 961 B.C., making the [[date of the Exodus]] under Moses to have been 1441 B.C.  During the following forty years Moses wrote the Torah and ''Job'', completing them before his death at [[Mt. Nebo]] about 1400 B.C.  According to Biblical scholar and historian Robert D. Wilson the Torah as it stands dates from the time of Moses, the five books constitute one continuous work, and was written by a single individual, Moses himself (Wilson, pg 11).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The remaining books of the Old Testament were written at various times since the death of Moses, with ''Malachi'', the last Old Testament book, being written about 455 B.C.  During this period each of the books was written and re-written on parchment or papyrus, with the editors taking great care in their work; a single Biblical book hand-written today can take weeks to complete.  The older scrolls were disposed of by burial or systematic destruction when worn from normal usage; as a result, the oldest surviving examples of Biblical manuscripts are those which have been carefully preserved either by direct actions of people (such as monasteries), or by removal from forces of decay.  Currently, the oldest surviving manuscripts are those found within the caves of Qumran in 1948 and known as the [[Dead Sea Scrolls]], dating between 250 B.C. to A.D. 70; the complete ''Isaiah'' scroll of this collection dates to 150 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around 200 B.C. the [[Septuagint]], a Greek-language version of the Old Testament, was completed.  This was due to the Hellenization of large areas of the Middle East after the conquest of Alexander the Great, making Greek the de-facto language for everyday communications and business.  The Septuagint marks the first time in history that the Bible was translated into a foreign language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early New Testament history===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1st Timothy 5:8, Paul quoted as scripture ''&amp;quot;the laborer is worthy of his hire.&amp;quot;''  This line is found nowhere else in the Bible except Matthew 10:10 and Luke 5:7.  In 2nd Peter 3:15-16, Peter classes Paul's letters with &amp;quot;other scriptures&amp;quot;.  Both lines are indicative of the writing down and general use of the New Testament prior to A.D. 60 (Halley, pg. 741-742).  Spurious &amp;quot;gospels&amp;quot; which are known to have appeared by A.D. 100, make references to the New Testament.  [[Clement of Rome]], writing in his own letter to the Corinthians in A.D. 95, refers to ''Matthew'', ''Luke'', ''Corinthians'', ''Hebrews'', ''1st Timothy'', and ''1st Peter'' (Halley, pg. 743).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oldest surviving New Testament fragment of which there is a reliable date is the [[John Rylands Fragment]] (P52) of the ''Gospel of John'', dating from 117-138 A.D., just decades from when the Gospel was first written. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biblefacts.org/history/oldtext.html N.T. Ancient Manuscripts]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The time span between the writing of the New Testament and the oldest surviving fragments are well under two hundred years.  By comparison, Greek classics such as [[Herodotus]], [[Plato]], [[Euripides]], and [[Homer]] have a time span well over a thousand years each between the date of the oldest known fragment of writing and the time period they were first written.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Translations==&lt;br /&gt;
===The Peshitta===&lt;br /&gt;
The second translated version of the Hebrew Old Testament and the Greek New Testament (after the Greek Septuaginta) was the Aramaic language Peshitta.  In 36 A.D., both the Queen of Adiabene (the last existing Province of the hated and feared by the Jews Assyrian Empire), known in Greek as Queen Helena (not the mother of Constantine) and known to the Jews as Queen ShlomZion (&amp;quot;Peace of Zion&amp;quot;), and her son King Ezad were converted to Judaism. Queen Helena's conversion, as wiell as others of the Kingdom, furthered the already developing translation of the Hebrew Scriptures in her Kingdom's language -Aramaic. That developing translation came to be known as the Peshitta - meaning simple or common speech, in much the same way as the Hebrew Bible would be translated into Latin by Jerome, with extensive help from a Rabbi,and the resultant translation would be called the Vulgate - meaning simple or common speech. The Peshitta, retaining elements of the then Jewish &amp;quot;[[Targum]]ic&amp;quot; (interpretive) and other Jewish understandings of the Hebrew Bible (see[[Midrash]]), is primarily based on the Pre-Masoretic Hebrew Scriptures - though certain books, such as the Prophet Isaiah,are translations primarily from the Septuagint  The development of the Old Testament Peshitta translation is held by some to have taken place alternatively in Adiabene's nearby neighbor Edessa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Thomas and his followers went to India, others (possibly Adai (Thaddeus), the Galilean from Caesarea Phillipi among them) arrived in [[Adiabene]], and having gone probaly to the synagogues first, as did the Apostle Paul), they found already, if not a populous, then an elite governmental element, conversant with the Biblical message in Aramaic. From these people, hearing the preaching of the messengers from Israel ,came believers in Jesus Christ, and soon after, came the translation of the Greek New Testament Scriptures into Aramaic, and so the Peshitta was added to by inclusion of the New Testament in Aramaic. Unlike the Greek canon of the New Testament Scriptures, the Peshitta originally did not include the following books: the Second Epistle of Peter, the Second Epistle of John, the Third Epistle of John, the Epistle of Jude and the Book of Revelation. But these books translated into the Syriac (as Christian Aramaic is known) are part of the Peshitta now and used by the Aramaic based churches, primarily in India and the Middle East - the Syrian Catholic Church, the Assyrian Church of the East (Holy Apostolic and Catholic Church of the East), the Indian Orthodox Church, the Chaldean Catholic Church, the Maronite Church, the Malankara Syrian Orthodox Church, the Syro-Malabar Church and the Syro-Malankara Catholic Church. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adiabene and its surroundings then became the sending center for a mission to the East that would eventually, taking advantage of the newly rediscovered monsoon winds blowing for months across the Arabian sea, making it possible for ships to no longer hug the coasts, and taking advantage of the &amp;quot;Silk Road&amp;quot; all the way from Antioch in Syria to China, take the message of Jesus Christ to India (bringing about the Aramaic (Syriac) language churches of Kerala) and even to China itself. And so, the Peshitta, written in the Middle East, become the Scriptures, for a while, of the Far East Churches of Jesus Christ, particularly in India.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Vulgate===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jerome]], a Latin scholar deeply interested in the study of the Scriptures, completed the second edition of the Bible in the Latin language.  The ''[[Vulgate]]'' was meant to replace the inaccuracies of the earlier ''[[Vetus Latina]]'', the standard Bible of the early Catholic Church.  Jerome had moved to [[Jerusalem]] in 382, and set to work on what eventually became a fresh translation of the Bible from the Greek of the ''Septuagint'' to translating the New Testament into Latin; from 390-405 he decided to re-translate his Old Testament directly from the Hebrew then in use by the Jewish community.  The ''Vulgate'' had a marked influence in church history, and remained the standard Latin Bible in the Roman Catholic Church for centuries; such was the length of time in use that it was finally replaced by the ''[[Nova Vulgata]]'' in 1979.&lt;br /&gt;
==Printing==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Gutenburg1.jpg|thumb|200px|right|Printers copy of a page from a Gutenberg Bible, printed in Germany about 1469.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Johannes Gutenberg]] of [[Mainz]], [[Germany]] invented the first mechanical printing press in 1448.  His machine consisted of a large press which when cranked down, pressed a sheet of paper upon a platform in which were set thousands of inked metal letter typefaces (called &amp;quot;movable type&amp;quot;), set in place to read for a particular page.  The first book in history printed by this method was the [[Gutenberg Bible]], in the ''Vulgate'' Latin version, of which 180 were printed, and approximately 50 survive today in varying conditions around the world.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Gutenberg Bible marked another first: printed Bibles could be mass produced to get into the hands of many people at a low cost. They first had to be translated out of Latin into a common language, and [[Martin Luther]] made the great German translation, 1522-1534.  The Protestant Reformers emphasized that laymen should study the Bible, and printing made it possible to go beyond the interpretationsd shown in stained glass windows to the actual text.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==English language versions of the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wycliff's Bible===&lt;br /&gt;
The first translation of the Bible into English was made under the supervision of the English cleric [[John Wyclif]] in the 1380's, with the assistance of Nicholas Hereford and John Purvey.  Wyclif held that the Bible should be placed directly in the hands of the people, but was this was opposed by the English Church hierarchy of his day; indeed, one of Wyclif's opponents, Henry Knighton, compared giving the Bible to the people in English to &amp;quot;casting pearls before swine&amp;quot;.  Archbishop Arundel of Canterbury promulgated a ban on all English Bibles in 1407, and possession of one was considered evidence of [[heresy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wyclif's was a scholarly translation, based on the [[Latin]], [[Greek]], and [[Hebrew]] texts, but was found to be unweildy due to its adherence to Latin grammar (in which, for instance, verbs tend to be at the end of sentences).  A second Wycliffite translation was prepared late in this period, which avoided this problem, but due to the fact that it could only be distributed in manuscript form, it was an expensive volume.  Outside of the nobility and gentry, it was more common to see only a single [[The Gospels|Gospel]], or  a copy of the Psalms, than an entire Bible, which cost more than the average working person could earn in a year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Over the next century, its form of English gradually became antiquated, leading English Protestants such as [[William Tyndale]] to feel that an entirely new translation was needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Tyndale===&lt;br /&gt;
During the middle of the 16th century there was a renewed sense of the need to get the Bible directly into the hands of the common man; prior to that the Bible was restricted to readings in the Church alone.  The Reformers were a group of people who were shocked at the differences between what the Roman Catholic Church was practicing as opposed to what the Bible stated can or cannot be done (this was one of the causes of the [[Reformation]]).  At great cost to themselves, the Reformers began the work of translating the Bible in the various languages of Europe; the printing press would ensure the newly-translated Bibles would be mass-produced.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[William Tyndale]] was committed to getting the Bible in the hands of his English countrymen.  Expressing open defiance of the Pope, Tyndale declared that if God would spare his life he would make it possible for even an ordinary farmer to know more about the Scriptures than the Pope. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.tbaptist.com/aab/tyndale.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Tyndale's translation of the New Testament was completed by 1525.  By April, 1526, 6,000 copies were printed and delivered to England. Official opposition led to the destruction of most of them.  Nevertheless, the printing press rendered it impossible to completely suppress such a book, and new copies were printed and smuggled into [[England]] Tyndale was arrested and charged with heresy for his efforts on May 21, 1536, and was executed the following year.  His efforts at translating the Bible led to the Matthews and Bishop's Bibles, then finally to the [[King James Version]], where ninety percent of the text closely follows Tyndale's translation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Authorised or King James Version===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:E-sword.jpg|thumb|200px|right|The internet has increased the availability of the Bible world-wide.  Shown here is a screenshot to [[E-Sword]], a freely-downloadable Bible study program. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.e-sword.net E-Sword]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (Rick Meyers, 2007)]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1601 King [[James I]] selected forty-seven of the ablest scholars in [[England]] to undertake the creation of a standard Bible in English, based upon careful translations of the [[Masoretic Text]] used by the Jewish community, and the best Greek translations (especially the ''[[Textus Receptus]]'') then available.  The scholars were divided into six committees in [[Oxford]], [[Westminster]], and [[Cambridge]], with each scholar had dedicating himself to doing a portion of the Bible, often consulting each other to check the flow and harmony of the work in progress.  The result was the 1611 Authorised Version, known in [[United States of America|America]] as the [[King James Bible|King James Version]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of the Authorised Version were profound.  Using less than 2,500 different words in its vocabulary, this Bible was written in a poetic style matched by few.  The work influenced the writings of [[Shakespeare]].  [[John Milton]] has numerous images taken from this Bible in his ''[[Paradise Lost]]''.  The direct style of writing caused it to be easily available to the common man.  Poets and writers, such as [[Herman Melville]], [[Walt Whitman]], [[Emily Dickinson]] and many others were deeply inspired by it.  It altered the course of English history, with England growing to a world power since the book's publication; when asked by a visiting dignitary what made England great, [[Queen Victoria]] pulled out her copy of the Bible and declared &amp;quot;This is the secret of England's greatness.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other versions ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the Bible is available in many versions across the English-speaking world, and has been translated into languages spoken by the vast majority of people on Earth, and even portions into a recently-created language from the fictional world of [[Star Trek]], [[Klingon]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kli.org/wiki/index.php?Klingon%20Bible%20Translation%20Project Klingon Bible Translation Project]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The past two decades saw the emergence of [[Internet]] use; the creation of the Bible as a software program was inevitable, and several, such as [[E-Sword]] and Theophilos, are available at no cost with a wealth of Bible-study material as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bible Scientific Foreknowledge==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bible scientific foreknowledge]] holds that the Bible shows an understanding of scientific knowledge beyond that believed to exist at the time the Bible was composed.  Many Christian scientists and apologists such as the Christian scientists and apologists at [[Creation Ministries International]], [[Answers in Genesis]],  and [[CreationWiki]] assert that the [http://creationwiki.org/index.php/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge Bible contains knowledge that shows an understanding of scientific knowledge beyond that believed to exist at the time the Bible was composed].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creationwiki.org/index.php/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge  Bible Scientific Foreknowledge]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1718/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i1/medicine.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Humor in the Bible==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Humor in the Bible}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible, especially the Old Testament, contains irony, puns, sarcasm, etc. It may be noted that the sense of what is humorous varies from people to people and from nation to nation, as well as varying from age to age. What caused a chuckle, smile, or laughter in the biblical &amp;quot;genre&amp;quot; was more connected with ''satisfaction'' at the vindication of righteousness among men. Thus to our day and age, and the commonality of people, for believers and non believers, the meaning of the spewing up of Jonah on the shores (even the great fish could not stomach him!) might be viewed as God working out His original will in history, Jonah flight from responsiblity being aborted, for the &amp;quot;days and ages&amp;quot; of the Bible, there was the added satisfaction derived from the understanding that God was not mocked by the rebellion of Jonah. Likewise that the &amp;quot;many cattle&amp;quot; also found repentence and acceptance by God, would not have brought the smile of glee, mingled with doubt,  but the smile of satisfaction that God's wide heart found its exultant victory over the measly, narrow perspective of the renagade prophet. There was no shame to stifle the Biblical chuckle at the &amp;quot;hows&amp;quot; of the vindication of God's justice. Yet, what we consider humorous also appears:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:After noticing that his father-in-law Laban was not treating him as in the past, Jacob decided to flee with his family. Rachel, one of Jacob’s wives, stole her father Laban’s teraphim (statues used for idolatry and/or divination). Laban pursued them and intercepted them in the Gilead mountains (Genesis 31:30): &amp;quot;Why have you stolen my gods?&amp;quot; Laban said to Jacob. The Midrash comments that it cannot be much of a god if it can be stolen (Midrash Genesis Rabbah 74:8). Jonsson (1985, 44-45) suggests that there is humor (albeit &amp;quot;rough&amp;quot; humor) in the fact that, not only was Laban deceived, but his idols were actually underneath his daughter Rachel’s posterior while she claimed that the &amp;quot;manner of women&amp;quot; was upon her. This idol did not get much respect. [http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/economic/friedman/bibhumor.htm]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bible Translations==&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible has been translated many times and in many ways so anyone, from the youngest child to the learned scholar, can read the entire scpripture in their language and reading level. A Latin version is the [[Latin Vulgate]] Bible.  Here are some common English versions:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amplified Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Douey-Rheims]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[English Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Good News Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[King James Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Living Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New American Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New English Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New International Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New King James Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Revised Standard Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Revised Version]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Septuagint]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible]] - still a work-in-progress here at Conservapedia.  This is the only known translation of any work from one language to the same language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bible versions==&lt;br /&gt;
Apart from Bibles that include the [[Apocrypha]],  The [[New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures]] is a distinct version that was produced to justify many of the unique doctrines of [[Jehovah's Witnesses]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bible exegesis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Biblical Exegesis the wiki way]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bible prophecy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Biblical accuracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Famous Bible paintings]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Midrash]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Targum]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Aramaic Church]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Judaism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Way of Salvation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Inspiration of Holy Scripture: An Eastern Christian and Jewish Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Testament understanding through the Jewish perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Messianic Prophecies]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
===Bible societies ===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.americanbible.org/ American Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.biblesociety.org/ United Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ibs.org/ The International Bible Society (New York/Colorado Springs)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wbtc.com/site/PageServer World Bible Translation Center]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wycliffe.org/home.htm Wycliffe Bible Translators]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.labibliaweb.com/ La Biblia] In Spanish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Online, internet, and downloadable Bibles===&lt;br /&gt;
====Hebrew====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0.htm Hebrew-English Bible] ([[Jewish Publication Society of America|JPS]] 1917 translation; includes Hebrew audio)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://tanakhml2.alacartejava.net/cocoon/tanakhml/d13.php2xml?sfr=1&amp;amp;prq=1&amp;amp;pnt=tru&amp;amp;acc=tru&amp;amp;dia=tru&amp;amp;enc=heb XML Hebrew-English (KJV) Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/Hebrew_OT/ Old Testament in Hebrew]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Greek====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ccel.org/w/westcott/gnt/toc.htm Koine Greek New Testament]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.htmlbible.com/sacrednamebiblecom/moderngreek/ Modern Greek Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Latin====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.LatinVulgate.com/ Latin Vulgate] — Latin Vulgate with parallel Douay-Rheims and King James English translations&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.sacredbible.org/ SacredBible.org] — Latin Vulgate translation of the Bible&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/Vulgate/ Jerome's Latin Vulgate (405 A.D.)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====English====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.audio-bible.com/bible/bible.html AudioBible] — Audio version of the King James Version.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.blueletterbible.org/ Blue Letter Bible] — On-line interactive reference library continuously updated from the teachings and commentaries of selected pastors and teachers who hold to the conservative, historical Christian faith.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.e-sword.net E-sword] — Downloadable Bible for Windows.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.onlinebible.net/ The Online Bible North America] — Downloadable Bible for Windows.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.theophilos.sk/ Theophilos Bible program]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/ASB/ American Standard Version].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/ English Standard Version] from Good News/Crossway (the publisher).&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.verselink.org/ King James Version with dictionary].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/english/KJV/ King James Version].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.newlivingtranslation.com New Living Translation]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bible.oremus.org/ New Revised Standard Version].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.europepourchrist.org/biblesite/WEB/ World English Bible].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dynamicbible.com/ King James Version built using AJAX technologies], with Strongs and Greek Morphological Codes by Robinson.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/index.htm#index The Hypertext Bible] with side-by-side translations in English, Latin, Greek, and Hebrew at the [[Internet Sacred Text Archive]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.biblegateway.com/ Bible Gateway at GospelCom.net] text search in any one of many translations in numerous languages.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.biblereadthrough.com/ Bible Read-Through] — read through the Bible in a year aid.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.TheFreeBible.com/ TheFreeBible.com] Bible software downloads&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.scripture4all.org/ Interlinear (word-by-word) translation of the Christian Bible] Hebrew and Koine Greek&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.aramaicpes&amp;lt;!-- spam filter --&amp;gt;hitta.com/aramaic_nt_resources.htm - Aramaic New Testament resources&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/en/versions.php Over 40 versions of the Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.armenianchurchlibrary.com/Bibletranslationsandstudies.html Eastern and Western Armenian Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bible9.com/ Online Bible (King James Version &amp;amp; Old Testament)]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.spcm.org/LSG_FR/ Bible — Louis Segond de 1910]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.latinvulgate.com/christverse.aspx Complete Sayings of Christ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bible.crosswalk.com/ParallelBible/ Crosswalk.com Parallel Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.blueletterbible.org/search.html#verse Blue Letter Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://recoveryversion.org/ Recovery Version Bible]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Spanish====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.wbtc.com/site/PageServer?pagename=downloads_spanish Spanish Bible] PDT version&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.labibliaweb.com/cid/1 Versiones de la Biblia] In Spanish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Turkish====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.incil.info Turkish Bible] (Turkish Old and New Testament)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Finnish====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.raamattu-kirja.com Finnish Bible] (Finnish Old and New Testament)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://vastaus.net Raamattu] (Study Finnish Bible)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Japanese====&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ibsstl.org/bibles/japanese/index.php On-line version hosted by the International Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.bible.or.jp/e/index.html Japan Bible Society]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Others====&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://agards-bible-timeline.com/q2_bible_english.html Bible Timeline]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.myjewishlearning.com/texts/bible/TO_Torah_880.htm?OVRAW=Torah&amp;amp;OVKEY=torah&amp;amp;OVMTC=standard My Jewish Learning.com]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://search.americanbible.org/ American Bible Society] to search NASB, KJV, CEV, ASV and others.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://etext.virginia.edu/kjv.browse.html University of Virginia Library] KJV word proximity search.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.1enormousidea.com/Default.aspx?tabid=42 Many translations in English, verse by verse]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bible-marathi.com Nava Karar] NT Translation from Greek to Marathi &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.bible-researcher.com/links12.html Gender-neutral Bible translations].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.evangelicalbible.com/why.htm Word-for-Word vs.Thought-for-Thought translation] Outlines the difference between formal and dynamic equivalent translation philosopy.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.kli.org/wiki/index.php?Klingon%20Bible%20Translation%20Project  Klingon Bible].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Commentaries and analysis===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ldolphin.org/icc-am.html Biblical chronology] by Alan Montgomery, B.Sc.(Hon)&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dinur.org/resources/resourceCategoryDisplay.aspx?categoryID=411&amp;amp;rsid=478 Biblical History], The Jewish History Resource Center — Dinur Center for Research in Jewish History, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.chabad.org/article.asp?aid=63255 Judaica Press Translation] — online Jewish translation of the Tanakh.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.angdatingdaan.org/biblicaltopics/bib_bible_1.htm Reading and Understanding the Bible].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://en.bibleinfo.com/ Source for Bible Answers].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.amazingfacts.org/school/af_logon.asp Amazing Facts Bible Studies].&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.iishj.org/images/Bible.pdf Learning Bible Today] — a historical approach the Bible.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://eword.gospelcom.net/comments/gill/ John Gill's Exposition of the Bible] — verse by verse commentary.&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ccel.org/ccel/henry/mhc.i.html/ Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible] — unabridged.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.verselink.org/ Topical References]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.verselink.org/ Bible Dictionaries and Encyclopedia]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wikis===&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://bible.tmtm.com BibleWiki]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://wikible.org Wikible]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Achtemeier, Paul J., ed. ''Harper's Bible Dictionary'' (1985), 1190pp;  mainstream scholarship&lt;br /&gt;
* Ackroyd, P.R., ed. ''The Cambridge History of the Bible: From the Beginnings to Jerome; the West from the Fathers to the Reformation; the West from the Reformation to the Present Day'' (3 vol 1978), standard summary of scholarship; [http://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-History-Bible-Beginnings-Jerome/dp/0521099730/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1243248143&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search vol 1]; [http://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-History-Bible-Fathers-Reformation/dp/0521290171/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1243248143&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search vol 2]; [http://www.amazon.com/Cambridge-History-Bible-Reformation-Present/dp/0521290163/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1243248143&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search vol 3] &lt;br /&gt;
* Coggins, R.J. ''Introducing the Old Testament'' (Oxford University Press: 1990), 172pp. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=22765464 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morgan, Robert, and John Barton. ''Biblical Interpretation'' (Oxford University Press: 1988), 342 pp [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=74356941 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Sakenfeld, Katharine Doob, ed.  ''The New Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible'' ('''NIDB''') (5 vol 2009), the latest mainstream scholarship&lt;br /&gt;
*Unger, Merril F. ''Unger's Bible Dictionary'', Moody Press, Chicago, IL (1966; new edition 2006); Evangelical&lt;br /&gt;
**Unger, Merril F. ''The New Unger's Bible Dictionary'', (2006); 1416pp; Evangelical&lt;br /&gt;
*Unger, Merril F. ''Unger's Bible Handbook'', Moody Press, Chicago, IL (1967);  Evangelical.&lt;br /&gt;
*Halley, Henry H. ''Halley's Bible Handbook'', Zondervan, Grand Rapids, MI (1965); Evangelical &lt;br /&gt;
* Sandys-Wunsch, John. ''What Have They Done to the Bible: A History of Modern Biblical Interpretation'' 2005) Scholarly history of transations and interpretations to 1900; [http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0814650287 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Williamspn, Peter. ''Catholic principles for interpreting scripture: a study of the Pontifical Biblical Commission's The interpretation of the Bible in the Church'' (2001); Catholic; [http://books.google.com/books?id=kooFtFGQsfsC&amp;amp;dq=intitle:bible+intitle:interpretation&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=b&amp;amp;as_minm_is=0&amp;amp;as_miny_is=2000&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=0&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES excerpts and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Wilson, Robert D. ''A Scientific Investigation of the Old Testament'', Sunday School Times, Inc, Philadelphia, PA (1926).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Language===&lt;br /&gt;
*Blass, Frederich, and others. ''A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and other early Christian literature,'' translated by Robert W. Funk; University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL (1961); German edition ''Grammatik des Neutestamentlichen Griechisch'' Friedrich Rehkopf, editor, 14th edition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck &amp;amp; Ruprecht, 1976. &lt;br /&gt;
*Moulton, James H., and others. ''A Grammar of New Testament Greek'' (two volumes), edited by Wilbert Francis Howard, T&amp;amp;T Clark Publishers, Harrisburg, PA (1985); originally published 1920, Edinburgh, Scotland.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bauer, Walter. ''Griechisch-Deutsches Wörterbuch zu den Scriften des Neuen Testaments und der frühchristlichen Litteratur''. Kurt Aland and Barbara Aland, editors; 6th edition. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany (1988). Heading βιβλίον, columns 281-82.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible| ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Book of Worship]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Franzcarl</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>