<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Farilz</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Farilz"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Farilz"/>
	<updated>2026-10-17T01:54:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wade-Giles&amp;diff=255896</id>
		<title>Wade-Giles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wade-Giles&amp;diff=255896"/>
		<updated>2007-07-31T03:23:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Farilz: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Wade-Giles system of Romanisation of [[Chinese]] characters (rendering Chinese characters in Roman - ie western - letters) was devised in the nineteenth century and was the main method used for most of the twentieth century. In recent decades it has been replaced to a significant degree in popular use by the [[Pinyin]] system, devised by scholars in the [[People's Republic of China]] in the 1950s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The system was first devised in 1859 by Sir Thomas Francis Wade (1818-1895), a British army officer who had served in the first [[Opium War]] (1839-42) and who in 1845 became a student interpreter in China. The system was modified in 1892 by Herbert Giles (1845-1935) and acquired its double-barrelled name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the drawbacks of the system are that pronunciation of certain consonants is only obvious to the initiated. In Wade-Giles, P is pronounced as the letter ''B''; P' is ''P''. Likewise K is pronounced ''J'' and K' is pronounced ''K'' Thus the place name transliterated at Peking was always intended be pronounced ''Be(i) Jing'' (as in the Pinyin ''Beijing'')rather than ''Pea-king''. These anomalies, and very many others, are not present in the Pinyin system which, for English-speakers at any rate, gives a much more accurate version of the Chinese words.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But some characteristics of Wade-Giles have notable advantages. A single letter is used as the basis for pairs of phonemes that differ only in aspiration. This more accurately representes how Chinese treats these pairs, from a phonological perspective (in terms of which vowels and consonants with which they can co-occur). Wade-Giles is more linguistically accurate than Pinyin, which uses different basic symbols for these phoneme pairs. In many cases, the orthography used by Wade-Giles for dipthongs is also more phonetically accurate than the pinyin alternative. Consequently, most linguists prefer to use Wade-Giles rather than Pinyin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:China]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Languages]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Farilz</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>