https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Falif 2026-10-13T07:59:40Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Science&diff=430422 2008-04-13T20:41:23Z

<p>Falif: Replacing page with 'Religion's worst nightmare. ==Notes== {{reflist}} ==See also== * Scientific method category:science'</p> <hr /> <div>Religion's worst nightmare.<br /> <br /> ==Notes==<br /> <br /> {{reflist}}<br /> <br /> ==See also==<br /> * [[Scientific method]]<br /> <br /> [[category:science]]</div>

Falif https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Intelligence_(psychology)&diff=430417 2008-04-13T20:40:48Z

<p>Falif: </p> <hr /> <div>Something Conservapedia lacks.<br /> <br /> [[Category:Military]]</div>

Falif https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hypocrisy&diff=430416 2008-04-13T20:40:24Z

<p>Falif: </p> <hr /> <div>'''Hypocrisy''' literally means criticism of others, by a standard one does not apply to oneself. It is hypocritical to use a [[double standard]] which strictly applies a rule to one group of people, while exempting or excusing another group.<br /> <br /> For example: Suppose a politician criticizes an opponent for &quot;catering to special interests,&quot; rather than saying and doing things which benefit every constituent. If this politician is also &quot;in the pocket&quot; of special interests, it would be hypocritical to critique an opponent for doing the same.<br /> <br /> Yet charges of hypocrisy are not so often directed against practices as against people. It is not that the critic really opposes &quot;catering to special interests&quot;, but that they just want that particular politician to be silenced or removed from office.<br /> <br /> * A mere accusation of hypocrisy can halt a debate by silencing the accused, forcing him off-topic to defend himself against the tangential charge of hypocrisy. This is how and why so many talking-head shows quickly degenerate into everyone accusing everyone else of hypocrisy, with nothing of substance actually discussed.&lt;ref&gt;[http://www.communistvampires.com/articles/hypocrisy.htm The False and Lazy Charge of Hypocrisy]&lt;/ref&gt;<br /> <br /> Hypocrisy is rampant throughout Conservapedia, and they have repeatadly shown their own stupidity and bias. WARNING: Being on Conservapedia may reduce one's IQ by a digit.<br /> <br /> ==References==<br /> {{reflist|2}} <br /> <br /> [[category:psychology]]</div>

Falif