<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Falco1029</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Falco1029"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Falco1029"/>
	<updated>2026-09-30T20:49:45Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Falco1029&amp;diff=644779</id>
		<title>User talk:Falco1029</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Falco1029&amp;diff=644779"/>
		<updated>2009-03-26T13:38:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Falco1029: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Welcome|sig=[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:JessicaT|''nandeyanen?'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:31, 26 March 2009 (EDT)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome [[User:Falco1029|falco1029]] 09:38, 26 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Falco1029</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Falco1029&amp;diff=644671</id>
		<title>User:Falco1029</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Falco1029&amp;diff=644671"/>
		<updated>2009-03-26T04:50:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Falco1029: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm a college student studying Computer Engineering and Computer Science. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any edits I make are likely to be minor corrections of things falling under my knowledge base.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also note that I'm an atheist yet have morals, humanity, and intelligence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{User Libertarian}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Falco1029</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Same-sex_marriage&amp;diff=644602</id>
		<title>Same-sex marriage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Same-sex_marriage&amp;diff=644602"/>
		<updated>2009-03-26T00:47:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Falco1029: Added some attribution, per guidelines&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;''' is at the forefront of the [[gay rights movement]]'s attempt to destroy the [[family]] as institution, merely to secure a legal basis for [[sexual freedom]]. &lt;br /&gt;
United States law forbids any kind of marriage other than &amp;quot;one man, one woman&amp;quot;. This specifically rules out [[polygamy]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; There are also laws to protect children from being exploited (see [[statutory rape]], incest, [[child molesting]]).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These laws enshrine the scriptural teachings of [[Christianity]] and have the support of [[Judaism]] and [[Islam]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to opponents of the movement, the primary purpose of marriage is to bring joy to society as much as to safeguard the development of happy families, and it is not for individual glory. They believe that unrelated people living together make each other miserable and harm society. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The battle over this issue is starting to look as large as the fight over slavery in 1860, [http://www.newsweek.com/id/172653/page/1] with proponents of individual freedom claiming that the rights of any one citizen must always trump those of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Morality==&lt;br /&gt;
Social conservatives regard same-sex marriage as immoral, and argue that use of the word &amp;quot;[[marriage]]&amp;quot; is a misnomer, because the [[Form of Solemnization of Matrimony|marriage services]] of Christian denominations define marriage as the union of a man and a woman,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.g. In some Christian marriage ceremonies,the wedding will begin with a statement along the lines of: &amp;quot;Dearly beloved: We have come together in the presence of God to witness and bless the joining together of this man and this woman in Holy Matrimony.&amp;quot; ''The Book of Common Prayer,'' Episcopal Church, The Church Hymnal Corporation and the Seabury Press, 1979: &amp;quot;The Celebration and Blessing of a Marriage,&amp;quot; p. 423&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a definition which was also written into United States federal law in 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode01/usc_sec_01_00000007----000-.html US Code - Title 1, section 7]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[James Dobson]]'s [[Focus on the Family]] organization prefers the phrase ''same-sex 'marriage,''' with quotation marks around the word ''marriage,'' to call attention to his belief that marriage&amp;amp;mdash;civil as well as religious&amp;amp;mdash;is intrinsically a union between a man and a woman, and that he therefore believes that same-sex unions are &amp;quot;counterfeits.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.family.org/socialissues/A000000464.cfm Same-Sex 'Marriage' and Civil Unions], ''Focus on the Family's'' website&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abuse of the term was unheard of a few decades ago; however, these unions are now among a number of issues advocated by [[liberal]] activists.  In the United States, marriage is primarily governed by each individual state and marriage laws differ from state to state. Several states allow [[civil union]]s between two people of the same sex, and two, Massachusetts and [[Connecticut]] currently issue same-sex marriage licenses. These marriage licenses are not recognized by the Federal government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1996 Congress recognized the likelihood that [[liberal]] activists would soon seek changes to the laws in some states that pertain to homosexuals. It considered the possibility of test cases reaching the Supreme Court, and of the court conceivably ruling that a state&amp;amp;mdash;even though it prohibits same-sex marriage itself&amp;amp;mdash;must honor same-sex marriages performed in another state. The Defense of Marriage act, which was passed and signed by President Clinton, prevents this possibility, and also prevents the Federal Government from recognizing marriage as anything other than a union between a man and a woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 a Vermont court ruled that under its constitution, it was not required to allow same-sex marriage but was required to make provisions to grant same-sex couples legal rights identical to those provided by marriage. Vermont responded by creating &amp;quot;civil unions,&amp;quot; which are legally distinct from marriages but convey the same rights. As of 2007, California, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Maine also provide civil unions or &amp;quot;domestic partnerships.&amp;quot; Beginning in 2008, the states of Washington, Oregon, and New Hampshire will also provide same-sex unions.  Hawaii provides certain benefits to same sex couples.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--civilunions-optio0531may31,0,341613.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut Newsday]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 2003 the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that under Massachusetts' constitution, same-sex couples could not be denied Massachusetts marriage licenses, making Massachusetts the first state to issue same-sex marriage licenses. Some same-sex marriage privileges are also legal in [[Connecticut]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081010/ap_on_re_us/connecticut_same_sex_marriage Conn. high court rules gay couples can marry]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[California]] has repealed same-sex marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Same-sex marriage is legal in five countries: [[South Africa]], [[Spain]], [[Canada]], the [[Netherlands]] and [[Belgium]].  Other countries, such as [[France]], [[Germany]], and the [[United Kingdom]], recognize [[civil unions]] and [[domestic partnership]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-03/05/content_311998.htm Countries worldwide address gay marriage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The religious ceremony of marriage is governed by each denomination and is unaffected by laws passed by civil authority. Same-sex marriage is forbidden in Orthodox Judaism, Catholicism, and most mainstream Protestant denominations. In Massachusetts, however, about 6% of all marriages are same-sex marriages, so this does not appear to be a problem. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.massequality.org/news/news_story.php?id=273]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pdfdownload.org/pdf2html/pdf2html.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fnchs%2Fdata%2Fnvss%2Fmarriage90_04.pdf&amp;amp;images=yes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Public attitude toward same-sex marriage parallels attitude toward homosexuality. In general, it is opposed by social conservatives and outside of this group, support is split down the middle leaning to opposition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Relationships/same_sex_marriage_poll_040121.html Same Sex Marriage Poll from ABC News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Issues ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cycle.gif|thumbnail|200px|right|A recent study by the [[Canada|Canadian]] government states that &amp;quot;violence was twice as common among homosexual couples compared with [[heterosexual]] couples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.statcan.ca/english/research/85-570-XIE/2006001/findings/risk.htm Aforementioned Canadian Study.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[James Dobson]] cites Stanley Kurtz to argue that the motivation of those advocating same-sex marriage is not to secure the benefits of marriage for gay couples, but to destroy the institution of marriage itself:&lt;br /&gt;
:...most gays and lesbians do not want to marry each other. That would entangle them in all sorts of legal constraints. Who needs a lifetime commitment to one person? The intention here is to destroy marriage altogether. With marriage as we know it gone, everyone would enjoy all the legal benefits of marriage (custody rights, tax-free inheritance, joint ownership of property, health care and spousal citizenship, etc.,) without limiting the number of partners or their gender. Nor would &amp;quot;couples&amp;quot; be bound to each other in the eyes of the law. This is clearly where the movement is headed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stanley Kurtz, &amp;quot;Beyond Marriage,&amp;quot; The Weekly Standard, August 4/August 11, 2003. - cited in [http://www.focusonthefamily.com/docstudy/newsletters/A000000771.cfm Marriage on the Ropes], Dr. James Dobson, retrieved from ''Focus on the Family'', 15 May 2007. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a March, 2007 report, there are 65,000 adopted children in the U.S. being raised by same-sex couples.  The same report says 14,100 foster children were being raised by one or more gay or lesbian foster parents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/06/25/gay.adoption/index.html Gay adoption: A new take on the American family]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Great Britain, the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) has expressed its full support to the stand taken by the Catholic Church opposing regulations on gay adoption. The Catholic Church sought to be exempt from the new law.  The  Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams of the Church of England, supports the Catholic Church's efforts declaring that the rights of conscience cannot be subject to laws. Catholic leaders have already said that its teachings prevent its agencies placing children with homosexuals and they will have to close if bound by the rules.  The MCB, the UK's leading Muslim umbrella group embracing over 400 affiliated organizations, said that while it supported anti-discrimination laws, homosexuality is forbidden in Islam.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www2.irna.com/en/news/view/menu-234/0701266670200554.htm UK Muslim group backs Christian opposition to gay adoption rules London], Islamic republic News Agency, Jan 26, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that homosexual couples have higher rates of promiscuity than heterosexual couples.  Allowing gays to marry would make gays seek more partners.  In addition, studies report that [[Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence|homosexual couples have significantly higher incidences of violent behavior]].{{fact}} These studies are not surprising given what pathologists have stated regarding the  [[Homosexuality and Murders|commonness and brutality of homosexual murders]].  The prevalence of violence and emotional abuse in gay domestic partnerships.A particularly worrisome factor among [[gay rights]] [[activist]]s is   One survey found 53% of gays felt if the high incidence of violence against partners in homosexual relationships was known and understood by the heterosexual population, it would hinder the drive for gay rights.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Domestic abuse is divided into two categories, emotional abuse and physical abuse.  While gay domestic abuse has not been studied to the extent that heterosexual relationships have, [[Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence|preliminary studies indicate a much higher level of abuse]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One type of emotional abuse--threatening to &amp;quot;out&amp;quot; a partner to family, friends, or employers--is unique to homosexual relationships.  Legalization of so-called &amp;quot;gay marriage&amp;quot; still would not end this type of abuse.  Although communication between married partners would be classified as privileged and any given partner would be legally obligated to refuse to disclose information without the consent of his/his mate &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Privileged Communication, Glossary of Legal Terms, Child Welfare Manual. http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&amp;amp;start=2&amp;amp;oi=define&amp;amp;q=http://www.dss.mo.gov/cd/info/cwmanual/section7/glossary/pq.htm&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJEcaFZh0PuFiqrbUh2JyAUhD_yA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, anonymous leaking to the media has been known to happen and the prospect of suffering a &amp;quot;Haggardesque&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Media Crossed the Line in Haggard Outing, Thursday November 20, 2008.  http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/opinion_columnists/article/0,2777,DRMN_23972_5152861,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; fate is sufficient to allow manipulative tactics such as blackmail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Intimate Partner Violence]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and biblical interpretation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nogaymarriage.com/tenarguments.asp Gay Marriage: Why Would It Affect Me? Ten Arguments Against Same Sex Marriage], NoGayMarriage.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.robgagnon.net/homoPresbyTodayArticle.htm  Why “Gay Marriage” Is Wrong, by Robert A. J. Gagnon, Ph.D.] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexual Agenda]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Falco1029</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Same-sex_marriage&amp;diff=644601</id>
		<title>Same-sex marriage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Same-sex_marriage&amp;diff=644601"/>
		<updated>2009-03-26T00:44:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Falco1029: A bit excessive and unneeded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;''' is at the forefront of the [[gay rights movement]]'s attempt to destroy the [[family]] as institution, merely to secure a legal basis for [[sexual freedom]]. &lt;br /&gt;
United States law forbids any kind of marriage other than &amp;quot;one man, one woman&amp;quot;. This specifically rules out [[polygamy]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; There are also laws to protect children from being exploited (see [[statutory rape]], incest, [[child molesting]]).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These laws enshrine the scriptural teachings of [[Christianity]] and have the support of [[Judaism]] and [[Islam]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The primary purpose of marriage is to bring joy to society as much as to safeguard the development of happy families. It is not for individual glory. Unrelated people living together make each other miserable and harm society. The battle over this issue is starting to look as large as the fight over slavery in 1860, [http://www.newsweek.com/id/172653/page/1] with proponents of individual freedom claiming that the rights of any one citizen must always trump those of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
==Morality==&lt;br /&gt;
Social conservatives regard same-sex marriage as immoral, and argue that use of the word &amp;quot;[[marriage]]&amp;quot; is a misnomer, because the [[Form of Solemnization of Matrimony|marriage services]] of Christian denominations define marriage as the union of a man and a woman,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.g. In some Christian marriage ceremonies,the wedding will begin with a statement along the lines of: &amp;quot;Dearly beloved: We have come together in the presence of God to witness and bless the joining together of this man and this woman in Holy Matrimony.&amp;quot; ''The Book of Common Prayer,'' Episcopal Church, The Church Hymnal Corporation and the Seabury Press, 1979: &amp;quot;The Celebration and Blessing of a Marriage,&amp;quot; p. 423&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a definition which was also written into United States federal law in 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode01/usc_sec_01_00000007----000-.html US Code - Title 1, section 7]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[James Dobson]]'s [[Focus on the Family]] organization prefers the phrase ''same-sex 'marriage,''' with quotation marks around the word ''marriage,'' to call attention to his belief that marriage&amp;amp;mdash;civil as well as religious&amp;amp;mdash;is intrinsically a union between a man and a woman, and that he therefore believes that same-sex unions are &amp;quot;counterfeits.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.family.org/socialissues/A000000464.cfm Same-Sex 'Marriage' and Civil Unions], ''Focus on the Family's'' website&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abuse of the term was unheard of a few decades ago; however, these unions are now among a number of issues advocated by [[liberal]] activists.  In the United States, marriage is primarily governed by each individual state and marriage laws differ from state to state. Several states allow [[civil union]]s between two people of the same sex, and two, Massachusetts and [[Connecticut]] currently issue same-sex marriage licenses. These marriage licenses are not recognized by the Federal government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1996 Congress recognized the likelihood that [[liberal]] activists would soon seek changes to the laws in some states that pertain to homosexuals. It considered the possibility of test cases reaching the Supreme Court, and of the court conceivably ruling that a state&amp;amp;mdash;even though it prohibits same-sex marriage itself&amp;amp;mdash;must honor same-sex marriages performed in another state. The Defense of Marriage act, which was passed and signed by President Clinton, prevents this possibility, and also prevents the Federal Government from recognizing marriage as anything other than a union between a man and a woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 a Vermont court ruled that under its constitution, it was not required to allow same-sex marriage but was required to make provisions to grant same-sex couples legal rights identical to those provided by marriage. Vermont responded by creating &amp;quot;civil unions,&amp;quot; which are legally distinct from marriages but convey the same rights. As of 2007, California, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Maine also provide civil unions or &amp;quot;domestic partnerships.&amp;quot; Beginning in 2008, the states of Washington, Oregon, and New Hampshire will also provide same-sex unions.  Hawaii provides certain benefits to same sex couples.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--civilunions-optio0531may31,0,341613.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut Newsday]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 2003 the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that under Massachusetts' constitution, same-sex couples could not be denied Massachusetts marriage licenses, making Massachusetts the first state to issue same-sex marriage licenses. Some same-sex marriage privileges are also legal in [[Connecticut]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081010/ap_on_re_us/connecticut_same_sex_marriage Conn. high court rules gay couples can marry]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[California]] has repealed same-sex marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Same-sex marriage is legal in five countries: [[South Africa]], [[Spain]], [[Canada]], the [[Netherlands]] and [[Belgium]].  Other countries, such as [[France]], [[Germany]], and the [[United Kingdom]], recognize [[civil unions]] and [[domestic partnership]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/english/doc/2004-03/05/content_311998.htm Countries worldwide address gay marriage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The religious ceremony of marriage is governed by each denomination and is unaffected by laws passed by civil authority. Same-sex marriage is forbidden in Orthodox Judaism, Catholicism, and most mainstream Protestant denominations. In Massachusetts, however, about 6% of all marriages are same-sex marriages, so this does not appear to be a problem. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.massequality.org/news/news_story.php?id=273]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pdfdownload.org/pdf2html/pdf2html.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fnchs%2Fdata%2Fnvss%2Fmarriage90_04.pdf&amp;amp;images=yes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Public attitude toward same-sex marriage parallels attitude toward homosexuality. In general, it is opposed by social conservatives and outside of this group, support is split down the middle leaning to opposition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Relationships/same_sex_marriage_poll_040121.html Same Sex Marriage Poll from ABC News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Issues ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Cycle.gif|thumbnail|200px|right|A recent study by the [[Canada|Canadian]] government states that &amp;quot;violence was twice as common among homosexual couples compared with [[heterosexual]] couples&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.statcan.ca/english/research/85-570-XIE/2006001/findings/risk.htm Aforementioned Canadian Study.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[James Dobson]] cites Stanley Kurtz to argue that the motivation of those advocating same-sex marriage is not to secure the benefits of marriage for gay couples, but to destroy the institution of marriage itself:&lt;br /&gt;
:...most gays and lesbians do not want to marry each other. That would entangle them in all sorts of legal constraints. Who needs a lifetime commitment to one person? The intention here is to destroy marriage altogether. With marriage as we know it gone, everyone would enjoy all the legal benefits of marriage (custody rights, tax-free inheritance, joint ownership of property, health care and spousal citizenship, etc.,) without limiting the number of partners or their gender. Nor would &amp;quot;couples&amp;quot; be bound to each other in the eyes of the law. This is clearly where the movement is headed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stanley Kurtz, &amp;quot;Beyond Marriage,&amp;quot; The Weekly Standard, August 4/August 11, 2003. - cited in [http://www.focusonthefamily.com/docstudy/newsletters/A000000771.cfm Marriage on the Ropes], Dr. James Dobson, retrieved from ''Focus on the Family'', 15 May 2007. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a March, 2007 report, there are 65,000 adopted children in the U.S. being raised by same-sex couples.  The same report says 14,100 foster children were being raised by one or more gay or lesbian foster parents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/06/25/gay.adoption/index.html Gay adoption: A new take on the American family]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Great Britain, the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) has expressed its full support to the stand taken by the Catholic Church opposing regulations on gay adoption. The Catholic Church sought to be exempt from the new law.  The  Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams of the Church of England, supports the Catholic Church's efforts declaring that the rights of conscience cannot be subject to laws. Catholic leaders have already said that its teachings prevent its agencies placing children with homosexuals and they will have to close if bound by the rules.  The MCB, the UK's leading Muslim umbrella group embracing over 400 affiliated organizations, said that while it supported anti-discrimination laws, homosexuality is forbidden in Islam.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www2.irna.com/en/news/view/menu-234/0701266670200554.htm UK Muslim group backs Christian opposition to gay adoption rules London], Islamic republic News Agency, Jan 26, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Studies indicate that homosexual couples have higher rates of promiscuity than heterosexual couples.  Allowing gays to marry would make gays seek more partners.  In addition, studies report that [[Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence|homosexual couples have significantly higher incidences of violent behavior]].{{fact}} These studies are not surprising given what pathologists have stated regarding the  [[Homosexuality and Murders|commonness and brutality of homosexual murders]].  The prevalence of violence and emotional abuse in gay domestic partnerships.A particularly worrisome factor among [[gay rights]] [[activist]]s is   One survey found 53% of gays felt if the high incidence of violence against partners in homosexual relationships was known and understood by the heterosexual population, it would hinder the drive for gay rights.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Domestic abuse is divided into two categories, emotional abuse and physical abuse.  While gay domestic abuse has not been studied to the extent that heterosexual relationships have, [[Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence|preliminary studies indicate a much higher level of abuse]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One type of emotional abuse--threatening to &amp;quot;out&amp;quot; a partner to family, friends, or employers--is unique to homosexual relationships.  Legalization of so-called &amp;quot;gay marriage&amp;quot; still would not end this type of abuse.  Although communication between married partners would be classified as privileged and any given partner would be legally obligated to refuse to disclose information without the consent of his/his mate &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Privileged Communication, Glossary of Legal Terms, Child Welfare Manual. http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&amp;amp;start=2&amp;amp;oi=define&amp;amp;q=http://www.dss.mo.gov/cd/info/cwmanual/section7/glossary/pq.htm&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFJEcaFZh0PuFiqrbUh2JyAUhD_yA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, anonymous leaking to the media has been known to happen and the prospect of suffering a &amp;quot;Haggardesque&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Media Crossed the Line in Haggard Outing, Thursday November 20, 2008.  http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/opinion_columnists/article/0,2777,DRMN_23972_5152861,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; fate is sufficient to allow manipulative tactics such as blackmail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Intimate Partner Violence]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and the Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Homosexuality and biblical interpretation]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.nogaymarriage.com/tenarguments.asp Gay Marriage: Why Would It Affect Me? Ten Arguments Against Same Sex Marriage], NoGayMarriage.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.robgagnon.net/homoPresbyTodayArticle.htm  Why “Gay Marriage” Is Wrong, by Robert A. J. Gagnon, Ph.D.] &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexual Agenda]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Falco1029</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Computer_Programming&amp;diff=644588</id>
		<title>Talk:Computer Programming</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Computer_Programming&amp;diff=644588"/>
		<updated>2009-03-25T23:57:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Falco1029: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This isn't very encyclopedic. The person who wrote this even used the word I. --'''&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;DarkGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Adrian&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;Yellow&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[User talk:AdrianP|P]]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;''' 13:56, 8 May 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I agree. Is anyone against me doing a rewrite of the article? Especially since open source programming should be its own article [[User:Falco1029|falco1029]] 19:57, 25 March 2009 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Falco1029</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Computer_engineering&amp;diff=644584</id>
		<title>Computer engineering</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Computer_engineering&amp;diff=644584"/>
		<updated>2009-03-25T23:48:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Falco1029: Added a bit of info regarding dual degrees&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Computer engineering''' is a discipline that combines elements of both electrical [[engineering]] and computer science. Computer engineers are electrical engineers that have additional training in the areas of software design and hardware-software integration. In turn, they focus less on power electronics and physics. However, a common dual degree program at many technical universities combined Computer Engineering and Electrical Engineering, allowing for more hardware-oriented designs and integration, or, conversely, a Computer Engineering and Computer Science ([[Programming]]) degree focusing more on the software-oriented side of things. Due to the overlap in courses and skills required for these dual degree, the extra major can usually be achieved within a year of the first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Computer engineers are involved on all aspects of [[computing]], from the design of individual microprocessors, personal computers, and supercomputers, to circuit design, as well as the integration of computer systems into other kinds of systems (a motor vehicle, for example, has a number of subsystems that are computer and digitally oriented). Common computer engineering tasks include writing embedded software for real-time microcontrollers, designing VLSI chips, working with analog sensors, designing mixed signal circuit boards, and designing operating systems. Computer engineers are also well-suited for research in the field of robotics, which relies on using computers together with other electrical systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first accredited computer engineering degree program in the United States was established at Case Western Reserve University in 1971; as of October 2004 there were 170 ABET-accredited computer engineering programs in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The high demand for engineers who are able to design and manage all forms of computer systems in industry has led to tertiary institutions around the world to implement a new bachelor’s degree generally called computer engineering. Both computer engineering and electronic engineering programs include analog and digital circuit design into their curriculum.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides having a sound knowledge of the mathematics and the sciences which form an integral part of any engineering discipline, computer engineering encompasses topics that are more specific to the discipline, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Algorithm]]s &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Computer]] Architecture and Organization &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Computer]] Systems Engineering &lt;br /&gt;
* Database Systems &lt;br /&gt;
* Embedded Systems &lt;br /&gt;
* Human-Computer Interaction &lt;br /&gt;
* Operating Systems &lt;br /&gt;
* Software Engineering &lt;br /&gt;
* [[VLSI]] Design and Fabrication&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the areas of electronic engineering and computer engineering overlap, such as electronics and digital systems which form the basis of electronic components.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==	 &lt;br /&gt;
* [http://wwwdsa.uqac.ca/~lsr/emcos/emcos-index.php?page=Computer+Engineering+Conference+Calendar Computer Engineering Conference Calendar]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.ieee.org/portal/site Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Computers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Falco1029</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Libertarianism&amp;diff=644582</id>
		<title>Libertarianism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Libertarianism&amp;diff=644582"/>
		<updated>2009-03-25T23:33:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Falco1029: /* Libertarian Philosophy */  small mechanical correction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Libertarianism''' is a [[Political Philosophy|political philosophy]] that tends to oppose the rules established by traditional marriage and religious values.  A libertarian believes in minimizing or entirely eliminating government interventionism in all aspects of life; including economic, personal and in foreign policy matters. The [[French]] [[term]] of ''[[Laissez faire|Laissez-Faire]]'', or ''let us do'', is a term that describes some aspects of the libertarian belief. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Libertarians are neither. Unlike Liberals or Conservatives, Libertarians advocate a high degree of both personal and economic liberty. For example, Libertarians advocate freedom in economic matters, so we're in favor of lowering taxes, slashing bureaucratic regulation of business, and charitable -- rather than government -- welfare. But Libertarians are also socially tolerant.  We won't demand laws or restrictions on other people who we may not agree because of personal actions or lifestyles.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
Think of us as a group of people with a &amp;quot;live and let live&amp;quot; mentality and a balanced checkbook.&amp;quot; [http://www.lp.org/article_85.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Libertarianism tends to emphasize an amoral form of individual ''liberty'', and tends to support rights of private property.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first systematic libertarian was [[Herbert Spencer]] (1820-1903), an English political philosopher whose books such as ''The Man Versus the State''  (1884) had a major impact in Europe and America in the late 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chris Matthew Sciabarra,  &amp;quot;The First Libertarian,&amp;quot; ''Liberty'' (Aug 1999) [http://www.nyu.edu/projects/sciabarra/essays/spencer.htm online] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ronald Reagan]] stated, &amp;quot;If you analyze it, I believe the very heart and soul of [[conservatism]] is libertarianism.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Libertarian Philosophy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarianism is best summed up in the so-called Non-Aggression Principle, which states that government (or &amp;quot;private police agencies&amp;quot; in the anarcho-capitalist variant) should only exist to protect life, liberty, and property from force and fraud.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarianism is closely related to liberalism, if this word is interpreted according to its original meaning of [[classical liberal|classical liberalism]]. Libertarians in America tend to be [[liberal]] on social issues but [[conservative]] on economic issues. Libertarians generally oppose government regulation of drugs, prostitution, marriage (including bans of [[same-sex marriage]] or [[polygamy]]), and [[euthanasia]]. The Libertarian Party officially supports legalized [[abortion]], however, libertarians themselves are divided on the issue, since government protection from force depends on the personhood of the unborn baby (or fetus). They oppose restrictions on [[pornography]]. However, they also oppose [[universal health care]], [[taxes]] and the [[welfare state]]. They are strong supporters of [[school choice]], and oppose continuing the [[public school]] system. Some libertarians support [[school vouchers]], while others are skeptical due to the issue of government influence over [[private education]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians support an expansive view of liberty as the proper basis for organizing civil society. They tend to define liberty as the freedom to do whatever one wishes up to the point that one's behavior begins to interfere with another's person or property through coercive means. At the point of interference, each party would become subject to certain principled rules for adjudicating disputes, generally accepting that one who has demonstrated a proven lack of respect for the rights of others should be subject to sanctions, including possible constraints on their freedom. They believe that liberty is the right of every individual.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians generally defend the ideal of freedom from the perspective of how little one is constrained by authority, i.e., how much one is allowed to do (also referred to as negative liberty). This ideal is distinguished from a view of freedom focused on how much one is able to do (also called positive liberty).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Libertarian Factions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians tend to use the word &amp;quot;libertarian&amp;quot; (small &amp;quot;l&amp;quot;) to refer to the philosophy, and &amp;quot;Libertarian&amp;quot; (capital &amp;quot;L&amp;quot;) to refer to the party. Thus, more libertarians exist than members of the [[Libertarian Party]]. Two general factions exist in the libertarian movement. The first are those libertarians who apply the principles of right to person and property to an absolute. They believe that no person, group, or government is above the right to violate these two things. They thus believe that government itself is illegitimate because it violates person and property. These libertarians subscribe to [[anarcho-capitalism]], as first named by [[Murray N. Rothbard]]. They believe that law and security can be handled by private means in the free market. The other faction believes in a very limited government. They are often referred to as [[Minarchism|minarchists]]. Libertarian minarchists want the state to only enforce law and order but generally nothing else. [[Ayn Rand]] was a minarchist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarians tend to view liberalism as a philosophy advocating less government interference in private morality and more government control of business, and view conservatism as a philosophy advocating more government interference in private morality and less government control of business, while they view libertarianism as advocating less government control in all areas. However, there have been fusionist attempts to mix libertarianism and with social conservatism. This is noted in particular by [[paleolibertarianism|paleolibertarians]]. They believe that social conservatism is a natural entity in a free society, but do not believe that it can be enforced by state interventionism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Libertarian Thought in America ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While there are libertarian factions within the [[Democratic]] and [[Republican]] [[parties]], neither party is particularly well aligned with libertarian thought. While the Republican Party sometimes adopts libertarian-sounding rhetoric of small government in economic affairs, many libertarians see it as being a force that has increased government interventionism in these affairs. Libertarians generally, for example, are opposed to the [[USA PATRIOT Act]], which they believe increases government power and removes protections on the liberty and privacy of the public. Most conservatives, on the other hand, view it as a necessary government program and believe security to be more important than personal liberty and privacy. Libertarians point out that such a view contradicts those of the founding fathers, such as Benjamin Franklin, who  summarized it most eloquently, &amp;quot;Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.&amp;quot; Libertarians are also generally opposed to the [[Iraq War]], unlike the majority of conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While all libertarians agree in general on the principles of the desirability of maximizing individual liberty and avoiding excessive government interference with the operation of the free market, individual libertarians have opinions that differ wildly within these general principles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The libertarian movement generally praises the [[United States Constitution]], regarding it as the proper scope of the national government. They believe that the Democratic and Republican parties have overstepped constitutional limits. Anarcho-capitalist libertarians, on the other hand, view the implementation of the constitution as the very reason the national government is the size it is today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notable Libertarians ==&lt;br /&gt;
Libertarian-oriented historic figures include [[Adam Smith]], Thomas Paine, [[George Mason]], [[Herbert Spencer]], [[William Graham Sumner]], [[Carl Menger]], [[C.S. Lewis]], [[Ludwig von Mises]], H. L. Mencken, Rose Wilder Lane, [[Albert Jay Nock]], [[Frédéric Bastiat]], Richard Cobden, and [[Henry David Thoreau]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most influential libertarian of the 20th century was [[Milton Friedman]] (1912-2006), a leader of the [[Chicago School of Economics]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ron Paul]], 1988 Libertarian Party and 2008 Republican Party presidential candidate. Ron Paul is considered to be of the Constitutionalist and [[paleolibertarianism|paleolibertarian]] schools of libertarian thought.&lt;br /&gt;
*The psychiatrist Thomas Szasz, opponent of the therapeutic state and compulsory mental institutionalization.&lt;br /&gt;
*Nobel Laureate economists [[Milton Friedman]], [[F.A. Hayek]], [[Ronald Coase]], Gary Becker, James Buchanan, [[George Stigler]], and Vernon Smith.&lt;br /&gt;
*The novelist [[Ayn Rand]] advocated a philosophy of ''Objectivism'', embodying some libertarian thought, although differing from libertarianism in many ways. Some of her novels, such as ''Atlas Shrugged'', have become icons of some people in the libertarian movement, while others find her materialism and [[atheism]] incompatible with moral ethics and natural rights and law.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Robert LeFevre]], significant in promoting libertarian philosophy in the 1950s and 1960s before it was a well-defined movement, with his &amp;quot;Freedom School&amp;quot; seminars on political and economic philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Hess]], speechwriter for [[Barry Goldwater]] credited with penning Goldwater's famous 1964 statement &amp;quot;Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice&amp;quot;.  Hess later became a major figure in the Libertarian Party.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Murray N. Rothbard]] was nicknamed &amp;quot;Mr. Libertarian.&amp;quot; He brought to life the anarcho-capitalist movement. Rothbard was an economist of the [[Austrian School of Economics|Austrian School]]. &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Samuel Edward Konkin III]], a significant figure in 1970s libertarianism, whose influence waned considerably after the rise of the Libertarian Party as he opposed political parties and voting as being against libertarian principles.  He proposed instead a purely marketplace-based route to a free society, such as [[tax resistance]] and doing business &amp;quot;off the books&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Robert A. Heinlein]], science fiction author, whose 1966 novel ''The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress'' was an influence on the movement.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[L. Neil Smith]], [[J. Neil Schulman]], and [[Brad Linaweaver]], science fiction writers.&lt;br /&gt;
*Several popular financial writers including [[Harry Browne]] and [[Howard J. Ruff]].  Browne would later run for President, twice, on the Libertarian Party ticket.  Ruff declared his political philosophy as libertarian but as a socially conservative [[Mormon]] made an exception on issues like abortion and prostitution, where he disagreed with the libertarian view.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Penn and Teller]], stage magicians turned libertarian evangelicals preaching [[atheism]] and promoting libertarian philosophies, including controversial positions such as legalization of prostitution and drugs in their Showtime series, which sports a name that cannot for reasons of good taste be expressed here.&lt;br /&gt;
*The Canadian rock band [[Rush]], which has been together since 1968, often explores libertarian themes in their lyrics.&lt;br /&gt;
*Humorist Dave Barry, actor/comedian Drew Carey, actor Denis Leary, former MTV VJ Lisa &amp;quot;Kennedy&amp;quot; Montgomery, actor Kurt Russell, investigative reporter [[John Stossel]], and the late rocker Frank Zappa have all referred to themselves as being aligned with or openly supporting the Libertarian Party.&lt;br /&gt;
*Trey Parker and Matt Stone, the creators of [[South Park]], proclaimed that they are libertarians. While South Park often offend conservative positions like religion, are vulgar, and support evolution they also make fun of liberals positions such as political correctness and environmentalism. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.reason.com/news/show/116787.html] Parker and Stone, Reason Magazine&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. The phrases &amp;quot;South Park Conservative&amp;quot; (the name of a book) and &amp;quot;South Park Republican&amp;quot; are used to describe the followers of these beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ed Clark]], the Libertarian Party's 1980 nominee for President.  Clark obtained the highest popular vote percentage to date for a Libertarian candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.faqs.org/faqs/libertarian/faq/ Libertarian FAQ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://dmoz.org/Society/Politics/Liberalism/Libertarianism/ Open Directory libertarian links ]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://chelm.freeyellow.com/black_index.html Black Libertarians]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://libertarianwiki.org/Main_Page Libertarian Wiki]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.l4l.org/ Libertarians for Life]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.independent.org/ The Independent Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.mises.org/ Ludwig von Mises Institute]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.fee.org/ Foundation for Economic Education]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Herbert Spencer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Democratic Freedom Caucus]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Republican Liberty Caucus]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Boaz, David. '' The Libertarian Reader: Classic and Contemporary Writings from Lao Tzu to Milton Friedman'' (1998) [http://www.amazon.com/Libertarian-Reader-Contemporary-Writings-Friedman/dp/0684847671/ref=sr_1_18?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1223323253&amp;amp;sr=8-18 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Doherty, Brian. ''Radicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian Movement'' (2008) &lt;br /&gt;
* Hamowy, Ronald, ed. ''The Encyclopedia of Libertarianism'' (Sage, 2008), 644pp, sponsored by the Cato Institute; [http://www.sage-ereference.com/PublicBrowse.html Online at some academic libraries]&lt;br /&gt;
* Murray, Charles. ''What It Means to Be a Libertarian'' (1997) [http://www.amazon.com/What-Means-Libertarian-Charles-Murray/dp/0767900391/ref=sr_1_16?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1223322878&amp;amp;sr=8-16 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tilman, Rick. ''Ideology and Utopia in the Social Philosophy of the Libertarian Economists'' (2001) [http://www.amazon.com/Philosophy-Libertarian-Economists-Contributions-Economics/dp/0313315582/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1223322878&amp;amp;sr=8-5 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Libertarianism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Falco1029</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Falco1029&amp;diff=644581</id>
		<title>User:Falco1029</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Falco1029&amp;diff=644581"/>
		<updated>2009-03-25T23:30:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Falco1029: New page: I'm a college student studying Computer Engineering and Computer Science.   Any edits I make are likely to be minor corrections of things falling under my knowledgebase.  {{User Libertaria...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I'm a college student studying Computer Engineering and Computer Science. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any edits I make are likely to be minor corrections of things falling under my knowledgebase.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{User Libertarian}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Falco1029</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>