https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=ErikConservapedia - User contributions [en]2026-10-07T14:35:58ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.35.14https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:About&diff=40623Conservapedia talk:About2007-03-16T03:07:13Z<p>Erik: </p>
<hr />
<div>Is that "LIBERAL BIAS" economic or social?<br />
<br />
Well, I'm going to assume economic bias, unless I hear otherwise, and change the page accordingly.<br />
<br />
==What kind?==<br />
<br />
"Conservapedia is rapidly becoming one of the largest and most reliable online educational resources of its kind."<br />
<br />
What kind is this, exactly? Is it the kind of source that has an inherent bias and slant towards a point of view? Because in my readings of CP articles, there hardly seems to be an attempt to be factually correct and completely bias-free... – [[User:frijole|Fʀɪ<small>ɺ</small>øʟɛ]] <sub>( [[User_talk:Frijole|тɐʟк]] • [[Special:Contributions/Frijole|¢<small>ʘ</small>и†ʀ¡<small>β</small>s]] )</sub> 12:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Conservapedia will never become one of the largest and most reliable online educational resources of its kind. Nope. --[[User:WhatWouldJesusEdit?|WhatWouldJesusEdit?]] 11:50, 15 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== WHAT? ==<br />
<br />
Another example of the closed mind of the conservative. Running scared, as it were, from anything that might challenge or make them think out-side of their comfort zone. This is the most biased site I have come across, and the claims it makes are unfounded and untrue. While<br />
Wikipedia is a world-wide resource, this I imagine will be mainly used in the United States... I'm suprised that you don't have to go through security and background checks and prove you're a legal US citizen to join this site. <br />
Good luck!<br />
<br />
== Bias ==<br />
<br />
Anything that anyone doesn't believe in can be considered a bias, but shooting down the other point of view as a bias and creating a site with the other biased side without trying to make a non biased site is completely ridiculous. I am a conservative my self, but I believe that creating this site for the reasons that wikipedia is biased for showing a liberal view and making this site have only a conservative view is even more biased. By doing this for all of the wrong reasons, and degrading wikipedia, you have shown how naive some people can be.<br />
--[[User:Erik|Erik]] 23:07, 15 March 2007 (EDT)</div>Erikhttps://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia_talk:About&diff=40621Conservapedia talk:About2007-03-16T03:06:22Z<p>Erik: Bias</p>
<hr />
<div>Is that "LIBERAL BIAS" economic or social?<br />
<br />
Well, I'm going to assume economic bias, unless I hear otherwise, and change the page accordingly.<br />
<br />
==What kind?==<br />
<br />
"Conservapedia is rapidly becoming one of the largest and most reliable online educational resources of its kind."<br />
<br />
What kind is this, exactly? Is it the kind of source that has an inherent bias and slant towards a point of view? Because in my readings of CP articles, there hardly seems to be an attempt to be factually correct and completely bias-free... – [[User:frijole|Fʀɪ<small>ɺ</small>øʟɛ]] <sub>( [[User_talk:Frijole|тɐʟк]] • [[Special:Contributions/Frijole|¢<small>ʘ</small>и†ʀ¡<small>β</small>s]] )</sub> 12:58, 13 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
Conservapedia will never become one of the largest and most reliable online educational resources of its kind. Nope. --[[User:WhatWouldJesusEdit?|WhatWouldJesusEdit?]] 11:50, 15 March 2007 (EDT)<br />
<br />
== WHAT? ==<br />
<br />
Another example of the closed mind of the conservative. Running scared, as it were, from anything that might challenge or make them think out-side of their comfort zone. This is the most biased site I have come across, and the claims it makes are unfounded and untrue. While<br />
Wikipedia is a world-wide resource, this I imagine will be mainly used in the United States... I'm suprised that you don't have to go through security and background checks and prove you're a legal US citizen to join this site. <br />
Good luck!<br />
<br />
== Bias ==<br />
<br />
Anything that anyone doesn't believe in can be considered a bias, but shooting down the other point of view as a bias and creating a site with the other biased side without trying to make a non biased site is completely ridiculous. I am a conservative my self, but I believe that creating this site for the reasons that wikipedia is biased for showing a liberal view and making this site have only a conservative view is even more biased. By doing this for all of the wrong reasons, and degrading wikipedia, you have shown how naive some people can be.</div>Erik