Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

User talk:HenryS

2008-09-03T20:22:29Z

EdwardP: /* Please stop */ new section

<center>''Complain below, please''</center>

==Likely vandal==

Hi Henry. [[User:NNSTK17]] seems to be a vandal. Please look at his edit history. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 18:53, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
:Thanks. Blocked. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 19:08, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
::Thanks :) -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 19:14, 14 July 2008 (EDT)

==Unblock reason==

LOL @ ''18:44, 16 July 2008 HenryS (Talk | contribs | block) unblocked AKjeldsen (Talk | contribs) ‎ (User is begging and whining to be unblocked. )'' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 21:18, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

== [[Hippocratic Oath]] ==

Henry, Why did you revert my edit to [[Oath of Hippocrates]]?
# The entire section is about people who are ''critical'' of the oath. It makes sense to call the section "Criticism" instead of the watered down "Views".
# "'''Some''' Christian doctors '''may not like''' this oath" — That's just deliberately weak liberal claptrap. Do you really believe that a ''devout'' Christian can "solemnly swear to Apollo and Asclepius" — [[pagan]] Roman Gods?! What happened to "Thou shalt have no other Gods before Me?" My edit just removed the liberal, cultural-relativist POV from that sentence. Look at the history, where [[Deborah]] has been watering it down and watering it down ever since the article was created.
# Other than that, I just made some links to other articles — which you also reverted.
Can I have your permission to edit the article again for these reasons?
[[User:GeorgeM|GeorgeM]] 11:45, 22 July 2008 (EDT)
:Okay. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 18:34, 22 July 2008 (EDT)

== Danish Writers Group ==

Hi, what's that group? Can I take part in it? I'm not a Dane, but I'm a Honorary Dane. [[User:Cacatio|Cacatio]] 18:33, 27 August 2008 (EDT)
:The DWG writes Danish content for the encyclopedia. It is a sort of "wikiproject" but more sophisticated. Yes, please do take part, all the other members are lazy and I am too busy being important to be bothered to write content. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 18:36, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

== Please unlock my page ==

From recent edits I see your up and about, could you please unlock my user page? Thanx

[[User:DLerner|DLerner]] 20:14, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

תודה רבה

[[User:DLerner|DLerner]] 20:17, 27 August 2008 (EDT)

== Ames ==

He's way too smart for this mundane ...
:Then why, why was he asking me to unblock him? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 21:31, 30 August 2008 (EDT)

==The Quiet One==

Henry, you've managed to keep such a low profile that I actually had to look you up to see whether you were an admin. ;-) We need to get together more. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 21:35, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
:Why do you keep getting all the awards? Seriously, the judging must be flawed. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 21:44, 30 August 2008 (EDT)

::ROTFL! You don't want this kind of award. :P --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 21:54, 30 August 2008 (EDT)

I noticed your revert of my user talk page. Thank you, Henry. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] [[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]] 22:36, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
:Sure, I didn't think you would want ''that'' there. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 22:43, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

== Request ==

Could you please protect the [[Multiplication]] page? I fear it might become the target of Liberal vandals, and it is quite good as it is now, don't you agree? Sure, discuss the protection with the Mathematics sub-project leader, Ed Poor. --[[User:EPauper|EPauper]] 12:06, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

== Please stop ==

Stop wikistalking me. I am not this Ames and have never been. I don't mock anybody. Have I said something wrong about this Ed or about you? I don't think so. I'm here to help, not for parody, as someone else. --[[User:EdwardP|EdwardP]] 16:22, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

User talk:EdwardP

2008-09-03T20:13:17Z

EdwardP:

Ames, please stop. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 15:52, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
:Please, use checkuser on me. Never heard of ''Innocent until proven guilty?'' --[[User:EdwardP|EdwardP]] 16:08, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
::Lets just call a spade a spade. You were obviously trying to mock Ed, and now you're trying to play innocent. Reminds me of "KTDiputsho". Just don't vandalize, or insert parody. Then I guess you'll be fine. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 16:11, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
:::Believe me, I'm more innocent than you. And I'll leave it at that. --[[User:EdwardP|EdwardP]] 16:13, 3 September 2008 (EDT)

User talk:EdwardP

2008-09-03T20:08:23Z

EdwardP:

User talk:Efloean

2008-09-03T19:48:15Z

EdwardP: /* Supposed block? */

==Supposed block?==

I noticed your comments on [[Talk:Overcoming homosexuality]] saying that you were supposedly blocked. Yet looking at your [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Efloean block log] I see no blocks. Can you point me to where this block supposedly occured? Could it be that you were trying to edit at night when the site is locked from edits except by select users? -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 21:28, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
:Firstly, I didn't know that it is a "dead time" in the middle of the night. Secondly, I was editing in the middle of the day (my time, though). Thirdly, why is the wiki blocked for editing in the middle of the night? And fourthly, thanks for pointing out that may haven't been blocked at all ;) [[User:Efloean|Efloean]] 15:41, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
::I'm new here too, but I understood that this site is often attacked by vandals. Since most of the Sysops are American, they decided to turn editing off at night American time, when there would be less attention for vandals. I also understood that once your edits are deemed good and you are no more a potential threat, you'll be granted "edit" rights, which means being able to edit at night too. I'm looking forward to it! --[[User:EdwardP|EdwardP]] 15:48, 3 September 2008 (EDT)