<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Ed+Poor</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Ed+Poor"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Ed_Poor"/>
	<updated>2026-11-08T04:14:45Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2199324</id>
		<title>Template:Mainpageright</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2199324"/>
		<updated>2026-07-14T21:16:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Demote reliability of &amp;quot;Loomer rumor&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;__NOTOC__&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;width:45%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:47%; border: #ff0000 solid 1px; -moz-bord'''Seter-radius: 10px; background: lightgrey; margin-bottom: 0.4em;&amp;quot;/]&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;-moz-border-radius-topright: .10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; background: #00a2ff; text-align:; font-size: 100%; padding: 3px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;nounderlines&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;font style=&amp;quot;trebuchet ms&amp;quot; color=&amp;quot;# 00ccff&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Welcome to Conservapedia!&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukraine]] Ambassador to the [[US]]''' ousted in [[corruption]] probe. [https://komersant.ua/en/stefanishina-zalishaie-vashington-goncharenko-zayaviv-pro-mozhlivu-pidozru-nabu/][https://go-ns.org.ua/en/article/ambassador-with-a-criminal-record-stefanyishyna-to-represent-ukraine-in-the-us/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Oil]] surges back to its highest price in more than a month''', around $85 per barrel of int'l crude oil.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[CNN]]: America takes over the [[Strait of Hormuz]].''' The US will resume its naval blockade of ships going to and from Iranian ports at 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday. [https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/13/world/live-news/iran-war-trump][https://global21.substack.com/p/the-war-is-back-trump-resumes-attacks]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Christ]]-centered great [[Lionel Messi]] faces off Wednesday against [[chess]]-playing Englishman Harry Kane''', in the most expensive [[World Cup]] game played yet. [https://www.aljazeera.com/sports/2026/7/13/argentina-vs-england-world-cup-tickets-more-expensive-than-france-vs-spain] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Spain]]'s phenomenal just-turned-19-year-old [[World Cup]] soccer star Yamal declines to get any [[tattoo]]s''', in compliance with the ban on body art in [[Islam]]. [https://www.instagram.com/p/DaUtDVRk-mI/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Monstrous war appropriations bill is stalled, and may not pass before adjournment''', due to the prolonged hospitalization of the elderly Sen. [[Mitch McConnell]] (R-KY) who chairs the subcommittee. [https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5961915-mcconnell-absence-trump-defense-spending/] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Laura Loomer]] had claimed that McConnell was brain dead on life support. [https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/2074281550535934173]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Richard Sakwa]]: [[Russophobia]] is leading us toward [[war]].''' [[Glenn Diesen]]. [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/richard-sakwa-russophobia-is-leading]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Neocon]] Sen. [[Lindsey Graham]] (R-SC) abruptly dies''' less than 4 months from his reelection, reportedly from an aortic dissection (which is often from heart disease). [https://justthenews.com/government/congress/medical-examiner-district-columbias-preliminary-findings-grahams-death-released] Graham's sister tapped to finish his term. [https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/holdmcmaster-names-blank-succeed-lindsey-graham]  ''Neocon [[Nikki Haley]], [[conservative]] [[Nancy Mace]] bypassed.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukrainian]] [[dictator]] [[Volodymyr Zelensky]]''' extends [[martial law]], cancels [[election]]s again. ''[[Russia]] to hold elections in September.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for [[crony capitalism]]''': Fox's boring announcers and too many commercials cause [[American]]s to flee to [[Spanish]] broadcasts of the [[World Cup]], setting all-time viewership records there. [https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/world-cup-telemundo-peacock-record-ratings-universo-1236807254/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''More job losses: wealthy [[Microsoft]] lays off 4,800''' employees while it spends $190 billion on [[AI]]. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/as-microsoft-lays-off-4800-employees-hr-head-amy-colemans-memo-has-a-direct-line-for-all-the-employees-the-jobs-are-not-being-replaced-by-ai-but-/amp_articleshow/132326446.cms][https://www.thedailydoom.com/p/the-deeper-dive-employment-data-and]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Where's the [[environmentalist]] outrage???''' &amp;quot;Planned [[Texas]] [[data center]]s could emit more [[greenhouse gas]]es than many countries.&amp;quot; [https://www.texastribune.org/2026/07/09/texas-data-centers-ai-power-plants-pollution-state-permits/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Robert Pape]]: [[Escalation]] (again).''' [https://youtu.be/ALCFBWpQwrA] [[Douglas Macgregor]]: Disastrous [[NATO]] Summit - Renewed [[war]] on [[Iran]] &amp;amp; [[Russia]]. [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/douglas-macgregor-disastrous-nato][https://youtu.be/mcp-pYYs_T8] [[ATACMS]] in [[Kuwait]], logistical support for US aircraft carriers in [[Oman]] hit. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-attacks-jordan-kuwait-oman-and-qatar-with-drones-and-missiles-after-us-strikes/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Stephen Bryen]]: [[Ukraine]] wants to produce [[Patriot missile|Patriot interceptors]]''' but there are problems. [https://weapons.substack.com/p/ukraine-wants-to-produce-patriot] ''[[The War Zone]]'': Ukrainian-built [[Patriot missile]]s won't be defending the country's skies anytime soon. [https://www.twz.com/land/ukraine-built-patriot-missiles-wont-be-defending-the-countrys-skies-anytime-soon] ''[[Responsible Statecraft]]'': Ukraine wants to make its own Patriot missiles. That's a bad idea. [https://responsiblestatecraft.org/patriot-missile-system-ukraine/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukraine]] [[TCC|press gangs]]''' stir [[riot]]s in [[Lviv]]. [https://armedforces.press/the-ukraine-war/2026/07/10/ukraine-farce-lviv-draft-clash-prompts-criminal-probes-and-military-self-review-as-bounty-hunters-encite-rage-among-ukrainians/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Troy Jackson, Shenna Bellows, and Nirav Shah emerge as the most likely replacements for [[Maine]] [[Dem]] [[U.S. Senate|Senate]] nominee''', anti-war [[Graham Platner]], who was forced out by the pro-war [[Establishment]]. [https://prospect.org/2026/07/09/three-likely-replacements-for-graham-platner-maine-senate-democrats/] ''The anti-war candidate -- Nirav Shah -- is the least likely to be picked by Dem insiders''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''BREAKING: [[baseball]] [[sports gambling]] scandal in [[Philly]]''': &amp;quot;FanDuel Used [[Bryce Harper]] To Allegedly Prey On [[Gambling]] [[addiction|Addict]] Who Lost $1.5 Million On Bets.&amp;quot; [https://brobible.com/sports/article/fanduel-used-bryce-harper-prey-gambling-addict/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Daily Caller]]'': OK [[Boomer]]: [[Neocon]]s used landline''' phones to poll young [[MAGA]] [[voter]]s. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/07/09/neocons-landline-phones-poll-young-maga-voters-trump-america-first-gen-z/] ''No, [[GenZ]]ers do not support [[warmonger]]ing''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] [[Presbyterian Church]]''' votes to recognize [[Gaza]] genocide. [https://pres-outlook.org/2026/07/assembly-declares-israels-war-in-gaza-a-genocide/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[MP]] from [[NATO]] ally [[Finland]]''' blocked from entering NATO ally [[UK]] for quoting [[Bible]]. [https://slaynews.com/finnish-lawmaker-blocked-entering-uk-quoting-bible/] ''Shared values of [[the West]]?''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Liberal media]] and [[Establishment]] [[Dem]]s force the anti-war [[populist]] [[Platner]] to quit''', even though he won his primary by a landslide. [https://apnews.com/article/maine-senate-graham-platner-48d472ac4a043792032f3e3f5a33ef1b][https://youtu.be/HpoV8s0AJXI]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Brazil]]ian couple face prison sentence for [[homeschooling]]''' their children [https://nypost.com/2026/07/08/world-news/brazil-parents-face-prison-sentence-for-homeschooling-after-court-accuses-them-of-intellectual-neglect/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Oil]] up 5%, [[Dow]] drops 500''' pts after [[Trump]] declares MOU dead. [https://apnews.com/article/stocks-rates-oil-iran-ai-671d9c94b302f7db533f46baa18387d3][https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/07/war-on-iran-both-sides-declare-their-mou-to-be-ineffective.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UniParty]] coordinates with unelected''' [[dictator]] [[Zelensky]] at [[NATO]] Summit. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/07/08/uniparty-senators-and-mike-turner-take-trip-to-turkey-nato-summit-to-coordinate-with-zelenskyy/?lctg=66158495]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Young men are losing millions of dollars daily on [[World Cup]] [[gambling]]''', as the volume wagered on [[Kalshi]] is exceeding a billion dollars per day. [https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/world-cup-drives-prediction-market-134200137.html] ''The man who betrayed [[Bible]] translator [[William Tyndale]] had lost his inheritance to gambling''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] reneges sanctions relief'''. [https://justthenews.com/world/middle-east/united-states-revokes-license-authorizing-sale-iranian-oil] [[Iran war]] resumes. [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/resumption-of-war-on-iran] Trump strikes [[Kharg Island]]. [https://youtu.be/uNigYi8VT7E] [[Prof Pape]]: Situation Report. [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/situation-report-special-edition-3e1] [[US]] hits 80 targets in [[Iran]], Iran retaliates and hits 85 US military assets. [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/update-american-military-assets-under]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukraine]] stored [[depleted uranium]]''' in populated areas. [https://youtu.be/DZnuTtx52kQ]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Liberal media]] is getting every high-profile [[Dem]] to abandon [[Platner]]''', and even his initial supporter [[Stephen King]] now says &amp;quot;he wasn't 'defending [[Platner]].'&amp;quot; [https://www.wmtw.com/article/maine-author-stephen-king-defends-graham-platner-amid-assault-allegations/71847957]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Bernie Sanders]] caves into the [[Establishment]] by urging [[Platner]] to drop out''', demonstrating the futility of the [[progressives]] as they bow to the [[liberal media]]. [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jul/07/graham-platner-democrats-senate-maine-trump-nato-us-politics-latest-news-updates]                                                                                                             &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Liberal]]s try to force anti-war [[Platner]] to withdraw by the July 13th deadline''' despite his winning the [[Dem]] primary by a landslide, and publicize an accusation of [[sexual assault]] which he categorically denies. [https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/07/06/ex-girlfriend-accuses-graham-platner-of-sexual-assault/] '''Update:''' Platner suspends campaign. [https://unherd.com/newsroom/new-platner-allegations-are-a-test-of-democrats-moral-limits/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[WSJ]]'': 'There is no going back': The inside story''' of [[Europe]]'s rupture w/ [[America]]. [https://archive.is/1Rp9v#selection-2142.0-2157.75]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Exit [[Mitch McConnell]]''', enter Abdul El-Sayed. [https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/exit-mitch-mcconnell-enter-abdul] ''[[Elaine Chao|McConnell's wife]] leaves country; [[Democrat]]s leave old school [[politics]].''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Federal Reserve]] says [[Biden border crisis]]''' made housing rise 30%. [https://justthenews.com/government/security/fed-reserve-working-paper-suggests-biden-illegal-immigrant-wave-drove-home] ''[[Democrat]]s call it [[Stimulus]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Phenomenal [[Kylian Mbappe]] has wit along with his [[Christian]] [[faith]]''', in his response to the &amp;quot;ugly football&amp;quot; by [[Paraguay]] whom he defeated with a penalty kick: &amp;quot;We can also get our hands dirty, we know how to do it. ... Guess they were thinking we were going to show up in tuxedos, but we were ready.&amp;quot; [https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/49272367/france-kylian-mbappe-paraguay-tactics-get-our-hands-dirty]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Out-of-touch [[United States Independence Day|Independence Day]] political campaigning''': poll shows that 61% of [[Gen Z]] -- the swing vote in 4 months -- do not even know what this 250th anniversary is celebrating. [https://thehill.com/polls/5953222-july-4th-ignorance-among-americans/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[NYT]]'' lies''' about [[Russian]] and [[Ukrainian]] casualties. [https://sonar21.com/the-ny-times-lies-about-russian-and-ukrainian-casualties/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Data center]] halted in [[Wyoming]]''' for spreading a rare metal-resistant bacterium into [[Cheyenne (city)|Cheyenne]]'s reclamation water supply. [https://share.google/Ga0IPjtsuHSZhs9vu] Constant noise from a [[Wisconsin]] [[Microsoft]] [[data center]] was initially mistaken as coming from a freight train engine! [https://www.jsonline.com/story/money/business/2026/07/02/microsoft-sued-by-wisconsin-residents-for-noise-from-data-center/90786863007/] ''MSFT has approval for 14 more there''. 8,000 polluting diesel generators in mostly residential [[Virginia]] are poised to turn on for [[data center]]s, as summer heat strains the grid. [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/01/data-center-boom-collides-with-record-heat-testing-power-grid-00983009]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''A [[secular]], non-religious [[Form of Solemnization of Matrimony|wedding ceremony]] for [[Taylor Swift]]''' at [[Madison Square Garden]]. ''Where's the meaning without any [[religion]]?''                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;The old [[politics]] are gone&amp;quot;''': [[conservative]] [[Steve Bannon]] bluntly explains the [[socialist]] takeover, and how the [[Establishment]] is clueless. &amp;quot;If you just sit there and demonize, that’s certainly not enough.&amp;quot; [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/02/the-old-politics-are-gone-steve-bannon-on-the-democratic-socialist-wave-00985060 ''Politico'']&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Times of Israel]]'': Thousands gather at Hostages Square''' in [[Tel Aviv]] to demand a state commission of inquiry into the failures surrounding the onslaught and massacre. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/we-wont-give-up-crowd-marking-1000-days-since-oct-7-vows-to-keep-demanding-state-inquiry/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''June &amp;quot;was the slowest month of hiring since February&amp;quot;''', as wage growth and hiring sputter. [https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/june-jobs-report-stable-hiring-rcna352603] 9 days of [[sour crude]] remain to make [[diesel]] in the [[Strategic Petroleum Reserve]]. [https://sonar21.com/only-9-days-of-sour-crude-left-in-the-us-spr/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Another [[socialist]] -- an opponent of giving military arms to [[Israel]] -- defeats a 15-term [[Dem]] congressional incumbent''', this time in [[Denver]]. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5945886-diana-degette-loses-relelection-bid/] ''The [[Dem]] [[Establishment]] is collapsing, while disapproval of [[Republican]] incumbents is high too''. [[Klippenstein]]: Dinosaur [[Democrat]]s meet asteroid. [https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/dinosaur-democrats-meet-asteroid]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Pulte]] cleans house at [[ODNI]].''' [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/07/03/report-acting-dni-bill-pulte-fires-dozens-of-odni-staff-for-politicizing-intelligence-insubordination-gross-misconduct/][https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/23/acting-dni-pulte-removes-51-from-agency-six-fired-and-45-sent-back-to-their-home-agencies/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''5-4 [[SCOTUS]] declares [[birthright citizenship]] a constitutional right''', turning the future of the [[U.S.]] over to the voting power of [[illegal aliens]]' children. ''[[John Roberts|Roberts]], [[Amy Coney Barrett|Barrett]], [[Brett Kavanaugh|Kavanaugh]] vote with [[liberal]]s.'' [https://technofog.substack.com/p/supreme-court-upholds-birthright]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Czech]] [[Political party|party]] seeks to strip [[Zelensky]] of nation's top honor''' after the [[Ukrainian]] [[dictator]] named a [[military]] unit after a [[Volhynia Massacre|Nazi collaborator]]. [https://www.politico.eu/article/russia-suspends-railway-border-crossings-finland-baltic-neighbors/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Nuclear]] [[weapon]]s ban''' lifted in [[Finland]]; [https://www.politico.eu/article/finland-lifts-nuclear-weapons-ban-nato-security-shift/] [[Russia]] seals border with [[Finland]] &amp;amp; [[Baltic States]]. [https://kyivindependent.com/russia-to-halt-multiple-railway-checkpoints-on-borders-with-finland-estonia-latvia/] ''[[Black Sea]] becomes warzone.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Buckingham Palace]] drops 500-year 'Defender of the Faith' '''from [[Charles III|King Charles]] job title. [https://www.rt.com/news/642356-king-charles-loses-defender-of-faith/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;[[Texas]] education board votes to make [[Bible]] passages required reading&amp;quot;''' [https://abcnews.com/GMA/News/texas-education-board-votes-make-bible-passages-required/story?id=134246001] but omits the most beneficial, life-changing passages to appease [[liberal]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Double standard]] for women who have [[abortion]]s is ending''': Dozens of women leaders and others endorse criminal penalties for mothers who abort. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/riley-gaines-abby-johnson-60-others-back-criminal-penalties-for-women-who-get-abortions/?utm_source=latest_news]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Pride month]] proclamation defeated in [[Maine]]''', for the first time by York County commissioners. [https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/news/local/lgbtq/york-county-rejects-pride-proclamation-maine-lgbtq/97-0e663938-ee1c-435b-96f7-648e11b8f2cd]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''3 million drop [[ObamaCare]]''' in just one year. [https://apnews.com/article/affordable-care-act-obamacare-health-subsidies-premiums-3dc9a0cd249a7622ce31e8559bfff729]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Zelensky]] and [[NATO]]''' promise 40-day '[[campaign of terrors]]' prior to [[Russian]] [[election]]s. [https://sonar21.com/ukraines-desperate-propaganda-campaign-while-russia-advances-along-the-entire-front/] ''[[Ukraine]] cancelled all [[democratic]] elections more than 2 years ago.'' [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-calls-ukraines-zelenskyy-dictator-without-elections-rift-widens] 237 injured, 42 killed in [[NATO]] attacks. [https://tass.com/politics/2153327][https://tass.com/politics/2153349] [[Russian]] [[parliament]] threatens NATO factories arming [[Ukraine]]. [https://unn.ua/en/news/in-the-russian-state-duma-they-threatened-strikes-on-factories-in-europe-that-produce-weapons-for-ukraine]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''With [[provocation]]s, [[drone]] attacks, and''' [[Britain]] and [[France]] seizing tankers, [[Russia]] arms oil tankers. [https://x.com/Globalsurv/status/2071561575173931440]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Transition Protocol: [[Saudi]]s tell [[US]]''' to get out; [https://youtu.be/0Yh3PCllz-0] [[Israel]] plans attack on [[Ayatollah]]'s funeral. [https://youtu.be/hqM7lHJUaTw]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Persian Gulf]] [[ceasefire]] violated.''' [https://youtu.be/kxKS2RwD5FI]. [[Trump]] strikes 'obliterated' [[Iranian]] [[military]] sites again.  [https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2071029590932258941] [[WION]]: [[Trump]]'s [[Iran war]] casualties: Major damage to [[US Navy|US Naval]] base. [https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0r67G5t0Cn0?feature=share][https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-s-iran-war-secrets-major-damage-to-us-naval-base-1782500227892] [https://youtu.be/5wmZT-WnT9c TOI] ''[[WaPo]]'': [[Israel]] '[[sabotaging]]' [[US]] attempts at 'lasting [[peace]]' with [[Iran]]. [https://thealtworld.com/anthony_cartalucci/washington-post-claims-israel-sabotaging-us-attempts-at-lasting-peace-with-iran]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[BBC]]: 8 [[Antifa]] [[extremist]]s''' get combined 450 years in anti-[[ICE]] '[[peace]]ful protest'. [https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/eight-people-alleged-ties-antifa-000019819.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Senate]] [[Dem]] wants new Dem leadership''':  &amp;quot;The old models are no longer working, and that includes the [[Democratic Party]],” Sen. [[Elissa Slotkin]] (D-Mich.) declared. [https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5941463-slotkin-democrat-leadership-change/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Washington, D.C.|D.C.]] [[Dem]]s &amp;quot;are freaking out''' about [[progressive]]s’ winning streak.&amp;quot; [[Establishment]] Dems &amp;quot;fear they’re on the verge of losing the party’s ideological civil war,&amp;quot; ''Politico'' [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/25/progressive-moderate-democratic-party-battlegrounds-00975000 reports][https://jimtreacher.substack.com/p/dems-panic-about-commie-infiltrators]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dr Brovkin]]: [[Russia]] warns [[NATO]]''' - [[Zelensky]] has crossed the point of no return. [https://youtu.be/Cq6z32cc5Wo]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Korybko]]: Is [[Trump 2.0]]'s '[[escalation]]' [[strategy]]''' against [[Russia]] starting to take shape? [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-20s-escalation-strategy-against-russia-starting-take-shape] [[Mearsheimer]]:  Russia has red lines &amp;amp; [[nuclear weapon]]s. [https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/russia-has-red-lines-and-nuclear] [[Lavrov]] vs [[Rubio]]: Who's telling the [[truth]] about the '[[Spirit of Anchorage]]'? [https://korybko.substack.com/p/lavrov-vs-rubio-whos-telling-the][https://youtu.be/eDg4YHtlJ3g]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] member [[Netherlands]] [[euthanize]]s 12 year old.''' [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/netherlands-just-euthanized-a-12]'' [[Western civilization|Western]] [[values]]?''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Alastair Crooke]]: [[Russia]] re-introducing fear''' on the world's stage. [https://youtu.be/P2N9xpZFCCs] [[Peskov]]: [[Nuclear]] [[deterrence theory|deterrence]] only force preventing global war. [https://www.newsy-today.com/russia-nuclear-weapons-are-the-only-deterrent-to-global-war/][https://youtu.be/Ew9XMVsMKXg]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Global [[food]] [[crisis]] update: [[Russian]] [[farm]]s shutting down''' because they can't get [[diesel]] as a result of [[NATO]]/[[Ukraine]] attacks on refineries. [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/global-food-crisis-russias-farmers] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] and [[Oman]] sign framework''' for [[Hormuz Strait]] governance. [https://www.roic.ai/news/iran-and-oman-forge-joint-framework-for-strait-of-hormuz-governance-06-12-2026]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump%27s_inept_advisers#John_Bolton|Trump inept advisor John Bolton]]''' who advocated [[war]] with [[Iran]] in 2019 pleads guilty to mishandling classified information. [https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/210438/john-bolton-donald-trump-guilty-plea]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Zerohedge]]'': Small plane hits [[Beijing]]'s tallest tower;''' was someone sending [[China]] a message? [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/small-plane-hits-beijings-tallest-tower-was-someone-sending-china-message]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Starmer]] to give enriched [[uranium]]''' to [[Ukraine]]. [https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/uk-to-guarantee-enriched-uranium-supplies-to-ukraine] [[Putin]]: [[NATO]] is openly planning [[war]]. [https://youtu.be/ho8Ti1QA37o][https://youtu.be/fUzLJJrt3Hc][https://thealtworld.com/andrew_korybko/whats-the-likelihood-of-a-nato-russian-clash-around-2030] [[Tootie Fruiti O'Rutte]] at the [[White House]]. [https://youtu.be/Pg_5_IrwObw][https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/24/nato-general-secretary-mark-rutte-gives-remain-in-nato-pitch-to-president-trump-in-white-house/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Left-wing]] [[populist]]s''' smashed [[incumbent]]s in Tuesday [[primaries]]. But can they govern? [https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/how-do-you-beat-an-oligarchy-one] Official [[DSA]] platform calls for abolishing the [[Senate]], the [[Presidency]], the [[Supreme Court]],&lt;br /&gt;
and more. [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/official-platform-democratic-socialists-america-dsa-includes-abolishing/] [[Van Jones]]: [[Mamdani]] is not alone. [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2026/06/23/van-jones-left-is-on-the-march-democratic-socialists-are-an-insurgency-this-is-a-serious-movement/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Democratic party]] [[establishment]]''' facing reckoning after [[far-left]]ists win power. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/24/democratic-party-establishment-zohran-mamdani-dsa-new-york-candidates-victories-win-hakeem-jeffries-israel/] [[Trump]] [[hate]]r [[Dan Goldman]] defeated, 65% - 35%. [https://www.bitchute.com/video/3RI7dwdMhq01] [[Hakeem Jeffries|Sorry, Hakeem,]] but the [[revolution]] always eats its own. [https://stateoftheday.us/p/sorry-hakeem-but-the-revolution-always] '' 'You’re next!' the [[socialist]]s yell.'' [https://youtu.be/FbI6a4D88po] ''[[Conservative Treehouse]]'': ‘[[Occupy Wall Street]]’ now officially controls the [[Democrat party]]. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/24/occupy-wall-street-now-officially-controls-the-democrat-party/]&lt;br /&gt;
---- &lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for monstrous [[data centers]]''': banned by 3 counties on Tuesday in [[Florida]]! [https://wiod.iheart.com/featured/florida-news/content/2026-06-24-3-florida-counties-ban-ai-data-centers-in-one-day/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Responsible Statecraft]]: [[Trump]] ended his [[idiot]]ic [[Iran war]].''' Good. [https://responsiblestatecraft.org/trump-ends-war-critics/] [[Finian Cunningham ]]: [[Trump]]’s [[Iran war]] debacle is ominous for [[Russia]]. [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/trumps-iran-war-debacle-is-ominous-for-russia]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': [[MLB]] players are '''''not''''' required to wear [[Pride month]] logos, and teams are suppose to tell them that. The [[San Francisco]] Giants failed to tell them, the MLB admits. [https://www.mlb.com/news/commissioner-rob-manfred-responds-to-letter-from-senator-josh-hawley] [[LGBTQ+]] community begs [[Liberal corporate tyranny|woke corporation]]s to stop 'helping' before they ruin baseball forever. [https://www.dailyskrape.com/lgbtq-community-begs-woke-corporations-to-stop-helping-before-they-ruin-baseball-forever/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[JD Vance]] infuriates [[neocon]]s.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/j-d-vance-infuriates-the-neocons/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Starmer]] out -''' World breathes sigh of relief. [https://patricklancasternewstoday.substack.com/p/breaking-keir-starmer-resigns-what] ''With 5 million [[children]] hungry,'' [https://labourlist.org/2026/02/tackling-poverty-legacy-keir-starmer/][https://archive.is/I8kCX] ''Starmer sends another $1 Billion to [[corrupt]] [[Zelensky regime]].'' [https://www.kyivpost.com/post/78478] [[UK]] [[Storm Shadow]] hits Voronezh. [https://www.military-stuff.org/total-war-storm-shadow-hits-voronezh-lyman-konstantinovka-fall-military-summary-2026-06-22/] Update: [[Farage]] demands snap election. [https://humanevents.com/2026/06/22/nigel-farage-demands-snap-election-after-keir-starmer-resigns]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukraine]] tries to drone [[Scott Ritter]]''' in [[Russia]]. [https://youtu.be/SVQl6Uzg8J8]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] [[Treasury Secretary Bessent]] on [[Zelensky]]:''' 'the little f--- acts like Mr. Bean on [[crack]].' [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/20/scott-bessent-volodymyr-zelenskyy-trump][https://youtu.be/cD3iGmNii9E]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Seymour Hersh]]: [[Trump]] break with [[Bibi]].''' [https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/trump-breaks-with-bibi]] ''[[Times of Israel]]'': [[Trump]] calls [[Netanyahu]] a 'conman'. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-told-carlson-musk-in-early-2025-that-he-wouldnt-attack-iran-report/] ''[[WSJ]]'': 'Trump makes the [[Jew]]ish [[state]] the [[scapegoat]]'. [https://www.wsj.com/opinion/iran-and-trump-blame-israel-first-a122a0d7] [[Macgregor]]: 'I fear for Trump's safety.' [https://youtu.be/B8Ej6IOjDPc][https://youtu.be/uTd1yNfie_8]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Araghchi]]: Talks delivered 'major progress' '''to end Lebanon war. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/vance-switzerland-high-stakes-iran-talks-get-underway-what-we-know-so-far]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Major rupture between [[US]]-[[Israel]]''' as [[Trump]] grows exasperated w/ [[Netanyahu]]'s bloodletting. [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/major-rupture-between-us-israel-as] ''Trump reveals oil reserves about to run out, 'bedlam' would ensue.'' [[Strategic oil reserve]] nears collapse… [[US]] must choose: [[guns or butter]]. [https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/strategic-oil-reserve-nears-collapse] ''US has roughly a 12-day supply left.  [[Trump]] must decide to give the [[military]] jet fuel or the trucking industry [[diesel]]. This is the main reason Trump signed the MoU with [[Iran]].'' &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[German]] opposition demands [[reparations]] from [[Ukraine]]''' for [[Nordstream pipeline]] [[terrorist]] attack. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/the-afd-co-leaders-demand-for-ukrainian] ''[[Liberal]] [[globalist]]s hell bent on [[strategic defeat]] of [[Russia]] through [[NATO]] [[proxy war]].''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[DNI Tulsi Gabbard]] releases evidence''' [[Anthony Fauci]] manipulated intelligence and [[lied]] to [[Congress]]. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/19/dni-tulsi-gabbard-releases-evidence-anthony-fauci-manipulated-intelligence-and-lied-to-congress/] ''It's time you know the [[truth]].'' [https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/2067792184753938484] Fauci subpoenaed.[https://justthenews.com/government/congress/rand-paul-subpoenas-fauci-testimony-covid-origin-probe]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''5 years post-[[covid]], [[Public school|public middle schoolers]]''' still can’t read or do math. [https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/22/5-years-post-covid-public-middle-schoolers-still-cant-read-or-do-math/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''A [[data center]] generates noise as loud as a refrigerator''', an outraged town is told by their mayor. [https://www.nj.com/business/2026/06/a-tiny-nj-borough-approved-a-18b-ai-data-center-now-its-residents-are-fighting-back.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Another [[socialist]] wins to become a big city ([[Washington, D.C.|D.C.]]) [[mayor]]''' [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/18/lewis-george-dc-mayor-primary-00966879] while [[GOP]] leaders are perceived to pander to [[oligarchs]] and foreign interests.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Mearsheimer]] &amp;amp; [[Parsi]]: Will the deal hold?''' [https://youtu.be/okSltilmp-o]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Vice President Vance]]: '[[Israel]] needs to wake up''' and smell the [[reality]].' [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/watch-mic-drop-press-briefing-vance-goes-israeli/] ''[[WaPo]]'': [[CIA]] warns [[Israel]] will do everything to undermine [[Trump]] [[peace]]. [https://archive.is/gP2xE] [[Regime change]]? [https://youtu.be/_2IiQLb1uTY] Report: [[Trump 2.0|Trump admin]] working to oust [[Netanyahu]]. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/report-us-officials-working-to-establish-informal-channels-with-israels-opposition/][https://youtu.be/5MWvoRgKRfk] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] Rape Gang Inquiry Report: [[Starmer]] let 13,000''' suspected rapists off as UK girls were systemically victims of [[grooming gang]]s over 30 years. [https://humanevents.com/2026/06/17/revealed-starmer-let-13000-suspected-rapists-off-as-british-girls-were-systemically-raped-by-pakistani-rape-gangs-over-30-years-rape-gang-inquiry-report][https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/06/17/rape-gangs-new-report-exposes-how-woke-ideology-enabled-one-most-horrific-scandals-british-history/][https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf] ''250,000 victims.'' [[Musk]] supports [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal|Nuremberg-style trials]] after Inquiry release. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/musk-supports-nuremberg-style-trials-after-uk-rape-gang-inquiry-release] ''[[AP]]'': Starmer on the precipace of resignation. [https://apnews.com/article/britain-keir-starmer-future-burnham-labour-cc4567e307b4b3e6fbcb75c2c66a503c]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[BBC]]: [[Poland]] strips [[Zelensky]] of nations' highest honor''' after the [[Ukrainian]] [[dictator]] names [[military]] unit after [[Nazi]] who murdered [[Poles]]. [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr7xzg3dmj8o] [[Ukraine]] expected to pivot closer to [[Germany]] amidst its anti-[[Polish]] stance. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/ukraine-is-expected-to-pivot-closer] [[Russia]], [[Belarus]] on Germany's attempt to rewrite [[WWII]] history. [https://youtu.be/ag55YoEDLJA]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]]: No approval of [[FISA 702]]''' until [[Save America Act]] passed. [https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116764370070279119]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Max Blumenthal]]: [[Israel]] in panic.''' [https://youtu.be/gqGpIngzUis]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Judge Andrew Napolitano]]: A [[Republic]] or an [[Empire]]?''' [https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/19/a-republic-or-an-empire/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Alastair Crooke]]: A new [[Middle East]] is born''' &amp;amp; [[NATO]] attacks [[Moscow]]. [https://youtu.be/GkiCgI8QwiM] ''[[The Hill]]'': Pressure on [[Putin]] to strike back hard. [https://youtu.be/sSehsS9hPPM] '''Update:''' [[Zelensky]] gives [[Belarus]] 7-day ultimatum. [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/zelensky-gives-belarus-7-day-ultimatum] ''[[Drone]] attack on Moscow stuffed with [[kerosene]] mixtures to give [[Hollywood]] affect.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Belfast]] in flames.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/after-a-shocking-crime-in-belfast-ireland-wakes-up/][https://youtu.be/0iynCosZ0UE] ''[[Catholics]] &amp;amp; [[Protestant]]s unite to send [[immigrant]]s home.'' [https://youtu.be/E5Yn65VS0Rg] [[UK]] Minister for [[Northern Ireland]] says 'crackdown coming' against those who complain about beheading. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/12/britains-prime-minister-for-northern-ireland-says-a-crackdown-is-coming-against-those-who-complain-about-beheading/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] provocation: [[Starmer]] seizes tanker''' carrying [[Russian oil]] in [[English Channel]].  [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/14/facing-domestic-military-embarrassment-british-pm-starmer-orders-capture-of-russian-shadow-fleet-tanker/] ''Meanwhile, Starmer refuses to stop [[illegal immigrants]] from entering UK by boat.'' [https://youtu.be/Elp8kHtlQgc] ''[[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]]'': [[Russia]] ships [[oil]] at near record pace. [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-16/russia-s-oil-exports-near-record-pace-as-ukraine-s-drones-target-its-refineries]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] military intelligence''' deliberately provoked [[Catholic]]-[[Protestant]] [[violence]] in the 1980s. [https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/leaked-emails-reveal-british-intel]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[FTC]] charges [[Ukraine]] [[Big Tech|Tech]] giant''' with [[fraud|defrauding]] customers of billions. [https://kyivindependent.com/us-trade-regulator-accuses-billion-dollar-ukrainian-it-giant-of-fraud/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''$300 billion &amp;quot;reconstruction fund&amp;quot; is a big burden''' [https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5931551-vice-president-vance-switzerland-trip/] to put on [[taxpayer]]s who never supported this war. Much comes from tolls.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'''[[Pennsylvania]]ns Lose Record [[Gambling]] Sum''' In Single Month&amp;quot;: $626 million lost in May. [https://gamblingharm.org/pa-gambling-revenue-may-2026-record/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Worst summer job market for teenagers ever recorded''', due to &amp;quot;[[inflation]], [[oil]] prices and cautious hiring,&amp;quot;  reports [[AP]]. [https://apnews.com/article/teens-summer-jobs-unemployment-economy-5415ea134061119e6450b9de15300ba2]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Minimum wage laws drive teen unemployment''', reports ''[[Fortune magazine]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Teen summer jobs are at an 80-year low. Employers are hiring fewer young people, citing an experience gap and rising minimum wages that make inexperienced youth less attractive.&amp;quot; [https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryancraig/2026/06/19/why-summer-jobs-for-teens-are-vanishing-and-why-it-matters/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Underrated Sports Stars|Underrated Sports Star]] [[Kylian Mbappe]]''' -- &amp;quot;Everything that has happened to me has been a gift from [[God]]&amp;quot; -- will become the all-time [[World Cup]] top career scorer, and netted 2 for [[France]] in its opener. [https://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/article/who-has-most-goals-in-world-cup-history-heres-where-lionel-messi-kylian-mbappe-rank-all-time-after-opening-games-161623449.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'''[[MLB]] warns Giants players who wrote [[Bible]] verses''' on caps during ‘[[Pride Month|Pride Night]].’&amp;quot;[https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/mlb-warns-giants-players-who-wrote-bible-verses-caps-during-pride-night] ''They wrote [[Genesis, Chapter 9|Genesis 9:12-16]] - the real [[rainbow]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] ends [[blockade]],''' [[oil]] moving. [https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/hormuz-normalization-begins-saudi-supertankers-exit-and-flood-persian-gulf-oil-heads-asia][https://dpyne.substack.com/p/trump-accepts-all-irans-peace-demands] [[Tucker]] &amp;amp; [[Piers Morgan]]: [[Trump]] puts [[Bibi]] in his place as [[neocon]]s cry over [[peace]]. [https://youtu.be/kpKQKOHzPLU]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukrainian]] [[drone]] attack on bus carrying [[Belarus]]sian [[children]]''''s [[soccer]] team kills one, injures 4 children. [https://youtu.be/DnlfsiArCD4][https://humanevents.com/2026/06/17/woman-killed-children-injured-after-ukrainian-drone-strikes-bus-carrying-belarus-youth-soccer-team-in-russia]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[NYT]]'': [[Germany]] and [[Japan]] rearming''' 80 years after [[World War II]]. [https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/14/world/europe/germany-japan-rearmament-military.html] ''[[United_Nations#UN_Charter_Chapter_VII|UN Charter Cht VII]] gives the right of any major [[Allies of WWII|Ally of WWII]] to use force against former [[Axis Powers]] without [[Security Council]] approval.'' &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Berlin]] [[police]] beat [[Poles]]''' carrying cross to monument of [[Polish]] victims of [[WWII]]. [https://x.com/PiotrCieplucha/status/2066910971830956514] ''[[RT]]'': [[Germany]] misses [[Nazism]] – [[Lavrov]]. [https://www.rt.com/russia/641625-germany-misses-nazism-lavrov/] ''[[Berlin]]'s growing [[military]] partnership with [[Kiev]] shows its [[Nazi]] instincts never truly disappeared, the [[Russia]]n foreign minister said.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Kyiv]] [[police]] [[tear gas]] anti-[[draft]] protesters.''' [https://www.hindustantimes.com/videos/world-news/massive-riot-takes-control-of-kyivs-streets-over-zelenskys-forced-mobilisation-for-army-101781524849102.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dr Robert Malone]]: The [[neo-Nazi]] lovers''' of the Hate-Industrial Complex. [https://www.malone.news/p/the-neo-nazi-lovers-of-the-hate-industrial] ''[[SPLC]]: Can it get any weirder?''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Good news for the [[unborn]]''': [[Texas]] [[GOP]] votes to criminalize a mother's [[abortion]] of her child, as in taking the [[abortion pill]]. [https://www.statesman.com/news/politics/article/texas-gop-platform-2026-convention-22289377.php]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] used [[psychologist]]s''' to craft messages to [[Trump]]. [https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/iran-trump-psychologists-ceasefire-negotiations]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Netanyahu]] rejects [[Iran]] [[peace]] plan.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/iran-war-day-107-israel-bombs-beirut-imperiling-u-s-iran-peace-deal/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] rejects [[Trump]]'s request''' not to strike [[Israel]] in exchange for [[money]], saying its allies are not for sale. [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/is-this-why-trump-thinks-iranians] ''[[Zerohedge]]'': [[Pentagon]] officially elevates Israel's intelligence threat level to highest category. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/angry-pentagon-sources-leak-report-israels-unhinged-spying-us-officials][https://youtu.be/HZ_mu-r65og]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[France]]'s new 30-year-old [[conservative]] superstar''' Jordan Bardella is ahead to become its president next year, and he waves off any support by [[Trump]]. [https://www.politico.eu/article/frances-far-right-frontrunner-jordan-bardella-rejects-us-donald-trumps-backing/][https://youtu.be/YAhxwt7i5Mk]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Entire [[U.S.]] men's [[World Cup]] team thanked [[God]]''' on the field after their 4-1 victory over [[Paraguay]]: [https://www.instagram.com/p/DZh5y_Gh7xk/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''A grandfather with a shovel''' saves a young man from [[Zelensky]]'s [[TCC|conscription officers]]. [https://t.me/two_majors/77389] ''Another win for the tactical shovel.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Tulsi Gabbard]] exposes [[cover-up]] by [[Deep State]]''': 'new evidence of past [[U.S. funded biological labs abroad|US government funding for more than 120 biolabs]] in over 30 countries,' she reveals. [https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/2065440568423944607][https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/gabbard-releases-intelligence-showing-federal-government-has-funded-120][https://www.malone.news/p/dni-gabbard-reveals-evidence-of-us] [[Andrew Korybko]]: [[Laura Loomer]] &amp;amp; [[MAGA]] like her are wrong: 'MAGA Dissidents' aren’t a 'Russian influence op'. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/laura-loomer-and-maga-like-her-are]&lt;br /&gt;
---- ''&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Glenn Diesen]] interviews [[Mearsheimer]] &amp;amp; [[Karaganov]]: [[Nuclear war|Nuclear strike]]''' on [[Europe]] to restore [[Deterrence theory|deterrence]]. [https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/what-nuclear-taboo] [[Korybko]]: [[Putin]] rebuffs hawks who want to attack [[NATO]]. [https://thealtworld.com/andrew_korybko/putin-powerfully-rebuffed-the-hawks-who-want-him-to-attack-nato]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[The Intercept]]'': Top [[Pentagon]] official admits''' boat strike may have killed victims of [[human trafficking]]. [https://theintercept.com/2026/06/10/trump-boat-strikes-human-trafficking-victims/] ''No one would smuggle [[cocaine]] with 11 people on board their drug-running boat.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] top commander: '[[Russia]] not looking for conflict'.''' [https://www.ft.com/content/751d4555-9e8c-42a0-a37b-80893727776c] [[Ukrainian]]s beat [[TCC|Zelensky goons]] with axes and shovels. [https://t.me/rezident_ua/29662]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[U.S.]] men's [[World Cup]] team is outspokenly [[Christian]]''': &amp;quot;It's [[Bible]] time.&amp;quot; [https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jun/07/usmnt-religion-christian-pulisic-world-cup-2026]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': [[priest]] in [[Spain]] denies [[communion]] to a [[homosexual]] man in a [[same-sex marriage]], and doesn't waver amid [[liberal]] protests. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/faithful-priest-targeted-by-protesters-after-denying-married-homosexual-holy-communion/?utm_source=popular] '''Update:''' First [[Gay pride]] parade in [[Israel]] in 2 years. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/thousands-gather-as-lgbtq-pride-parade-kicks-off-in-tel-aviv-for-first-time-in-two-years/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] hits [[India]]n oil tanker''', [https://youtu.be/PsdFwjKE6hk] 3 Indian sailors killed; [https://x.com/sarbanandsonwal/status/2064965653749268514] [[India]] deploys [[nuke]]s for first time in history. [https://youtu.be/7sRN6hnzRxw] India signals rethink over [[West Asia]]. [https://www.indianpunchline.com/india-signals-rethink-over-west-asia/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] [[escalate]]s [[war]]''', [https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2064824143640502670] water treatment plant hit. [https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/iran-says-us-military-deliberately-struck-vital-civilian-water-infrastructure-in-south/3963183]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
''''The Art of The No Deal':''' [https://x.com/barnes_law/status/2059668005252952355] [[Trump]] cancels [[aggression]] against [[Iran]]. [https://www.nbcnews.com/world/iran/live-blog/live-updates-us-strikes-iran-trump-hormuz-closed-rcna349554]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] ally [[Erdoğan]]: [[Israel]]i actions''' in [[Syria]] and [[Lebanon]] threaten [[Turkiye]]. [https://greekcitytimes.com/2026/06/10/erdogan-greater-israel-threat-turkey-syria-lebanon-2026/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Mario Nawfal]] interviews [[Tucker Carlson]].''' [https://youtu.be/seaUXVin4Gw]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[DNI]] revokes [[Biden]]-era''' flawed and [[fraud]]ulent intelligence assessments. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/12/dni-tulsi-gabbard-aaron-lukas-revokes-biden-era-assessments-created-inside-weaponized-cia-analyst-system/] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Sports gambling]] pandemic splits [[Texas]] from the [[U.S.]]''', as a Texas court rules in favor of allowing the [[NCAA]]-banned Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby to play. On appeal, &amp;quot;all four judges are Texas Tech alums if you're wondering,&amp;quot; [[Associated Press|AP]] reports. [https://abcnews.com/Politics/wireStory/college-sports-suddenly-facing-major-question-hinges-gambling-133740336] ''&amp;quot;Don't mess with [[Texas]]&amp;quot;!!!!''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conservapedia proven right]], again: the [[liberal media]] and the [[Establishment]] lose in a landslide''' to [[Graham Platner]], 72%-28%, in the [[Maine]] [[Dem]] primary for [[U.S. Senate]]. [https://www.cnn.com/election/2026/primaries/maine?admin1=23&amp;amp;election-data-id=2026-SD&amp;amp;election-painting-mode=single-party-candidates&amp;amp;filter-key-races=false&amp;amp;filter-flipped=false&amp;amp;filter-remaining=false] ''[[Republican]]s face similar losses in the [[2026 midterm elections]], if they don't pivot soon''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Fun to read about''': the genuine, intelligent [[populist]] [[Progressive]], [[Graham Platner]], sharply rebukes the idiotic one, [[John Fetterman]]. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5915534-maine-senate-race-platner-fetterman/?tbref=hp]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[The American Conservative]]'': Is the [[Iran war]]''' tipping [[Persian Gulf|the Gulf]] away from the [[US]]?&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Israel]] defies [[Trump]]''' and attacks [[Iran]]. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/iran-fm-blames-us-contradictions-stalled-peace-talks-tehran-slaps-million-dollar][https://www.timesofisrael.com/defying-trump-israel-strikes-iranian-military-fuel-targets-iran-houthis-fire-missiles-at-israel/][https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/iran-war-israel-again-bombs-lebanon-defying-trump-and-killing-deal-middle-east-straits-as-foundations-for-new-security-architecture-alon-mizrahis-zionism-delenda-est-debate-over-oil-cliff-t.html] [[News Forensics]]: The Donald &amp;amp; Bibi Show. [https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/the-donald-and-bibi-show] ''Not a comedy''. [[Houthi]]s ban Israeli shipping through the Bab el-Mandeb. [https://youtu.be/8M3QHjXk-04]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Pentagon]] accuses [[Israel]] of spying''' on the [[Trump 2.0|Trump administration]]. [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-raised-threat-israeli-spying-us-highest-level-sources-say-rcna348565]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conflicts Forum]]: '[[Israel]] is sliding''' towards [[anarchy]]'. [https://azradale.substack.com/p/israel-is-sliding-towards-anarchy]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Sen Mark Warner]] kept the [[Russia hoax]] alive''' for a decade. Now he’s blocking Pulte, the man who could expose him. [https://youtu.be/1_kVEbEZDf4]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] elite fail in their out-all smears of [[Graham Platner]]''', the anti-war [[progressive]] opportunist in [[Maine]] campaigning against the [[Establishment]]. [https://abcnews.com/Politics/maine-democrats-divided-platner-stick-reluctantly/story][https://jimtreacher.substack.com/p/i-believe-lyndsey-fifield][https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/gop-aipac-centrist-dems-for-keeps-schumer-platner-el-sayed.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] shot down [[Apache helicopter]].''' [https://youtu.be/MBIH6L9x0bg] ''First Apache helicopter lost in [[Iran war|Iran conflict]].''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conservative populist]] Zach Lahn won a stunning upset over the [[Trump]]-endorsed favorite''' for the [[GOP]] nomination for [[Iowa]] governor. Lahn opposed [[data center]]s, was endorsed by MAHA, and by [https://x.com/SteaknShake/status/2062149779446980912?s=20 Steak 'n Shake!] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] gives [[Azov Nazi]]s [[AI]]-guided [[drone]]s''' &amp;amp; why these are not game-changers. [https://rumble.com/v7at8zy-us-gives-ukrainian-nazis-ai-guided-drones-and-why-these-are-not-game-change.html] [[Putin]] responds to latest [[NATO]]/[[Zelensky]] [[psyop]]. [https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/putins-message-to-ukraine-keep-on][https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/russia-at-the-crossroads-as-elites]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] elite do not want the [[progressive]] [[populist]] [[Graham Platner]] in the [[U.S. Senate]]'''. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5912815-madeleine-dean-on-platner-allegations/?tbref=hp]  Platner forcing [[Dems]] to reckon with 'Vote Blue No Matter Who'. [https://theintercept.com/2026/05/28/graham-platner-jake-auchincloss-democrats-maine-senate/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Robert Pape]]: The New Phase.''' [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/the-new-phase]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Just the News]]'':  More than a dozen [[House]] [[Republican]]s''' help [[Democrat]]s pass [[Ukraine aid]] package. [https://justthenews.com/government/congress/more-dozen-house-republicans-help-democrats-pass-ukraine-aid-package]. Pigs at the [[democracy]] trough. [https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/pigs-at-the-democracy-trough]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] walks out of interview''' with ''[[Meet the Press]]'' [[fake news]] anchor [[Kristen Welker]]. [https://youtu.be/eCryZlXg7Uk]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Republican]] senators in the key [[2026 midterm elections|midterm election]] races''' -- [[Maine]], [[Ohio]], and [[Alaska]] -- vote against [[Trump]] in connection with his new [[White House]] ballroom. [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/breaking-six-republican-senators-vote-democrats-block-construction/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Best of the public]], again''': a mere &amp;quot;qualifier&amp;quot;, someone who had to win 3 rounds to qualify as an unseeded player for the French Open, has reached the women's finals to the cheers of [[Poland]]. [https://apnews.com/article/french-open-women-semifinals-roland-garros-483dbbf0e39d1d6ad94ee5eb55f122e0]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for [[perpetual war]]''': the [[House]], including [[conservative]] [[Republican]]s, vote for a 60-day window to end the war against [[Iran]]. [https://apnews.com/article/iran-war-powers-vote-house-9aaadea35f9523c818802286a6553536]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] attacks [[St. Petersburg]].''' [https://marksleboda.substack.com/p/nato-transitions-to-a-long-term-dirty] Do [[Palantir]]’s bosses have blood on their hands over the [[Starobelsk massacre]]? [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/do-palantirs-bosses-have-blood-on-their-hands-over-the-starobelsk-massacre]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] [[cover up]] of catastrophic [[nuclear]] threat''' to [[Europe]] gives the heinous game away. [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/nato-cover-up-of-catastrophic-nuclear-threat-to-europe-gives-the-heinous-game-away]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''The normalization of [[chaos]]:''' How conflicts in [[Ukraine]] and [[Iran]] advance in the dark. [https://global21.substack.com/p/the-normalization-of-chaos-how-conflicts] [[Trump]]’s [[Iran]] trap: a [[war]] he can’t win, a [[peace]] he won’t make. [https://www.aaronmate.net/p/trumps-iran-trap-a-war-he-cant-win] The world after [[America]]. [https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/04/the-world-after-america/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Daily Caller]]'': [[Nazi]]-tattooed [[Senate]] candidate''' accused of physically abusing ex-girlfriend. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/04/graham-platner-maine-senate-race-alleged-abuse-ex-girlfriend/] [[Graham Platner]]’s accusers came forward. ''[[NYT]]'' fed them to the wolves. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/04/new-york-times-graham-platner-lyndsey-fifield-catch-and-kill-domestic-abuse/] Talarico &amp;amp; [[Platner]] unvetted. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/05/31/faiz-shakir-quibbles-pat-mchenry-nazi-graham-platner-tattoos-abc-news-this-week/][https://freebeacon.substack.com/p/totenkopf-tattooed-platner-admired]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Gilbert Doctorow]]: [[Religion]] and national identity.''' [https://gilbertdoctorow.substack.com/p/religion-and-national-identity]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': significant decline in approval of [[same-sex marriage]] and relationships, reports [[Gallup]]. [https://apnews.com/article/gallup-poll-same-sex-marriage-morality-e12acb151446ac1b7970c0825bf1d072]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Increasingly positive view of the [[Bible]] in the [[U.S.]]''', shifting from 2016 to 2024: 36% -&amp;gt; 48% say it's true, 37% -&amp;gt; 43% say it's helpful today, and 47% -&amp;gt; 51% of [[American]]s have read more than half the [[Bible]]. [https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/americans-judge-the-good-book-more-positively-but-still-often-by-its-cover/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] carries out large-scale attack''' and [[Trump]] maintains tactical silence. [https://global21.substack.com/p/iran-carries-out-large-scale-attack]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Candid criticism by [[Paraguay]] tennis player of a female umpire's failure to control the crowd in a tense match''': he is then slapped by [[liberal]]s with a massive fine. [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/06/01/french-open-fines-paraguays-vallejo-for-saying-a-woman-shouldnt-have-umpired-his-match/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Political prisoner [[Tina Peters]] released from jail by [[Colorado]] [[liberals]]''': &amp;quot;I know that the [[Democrat]]s are going to cheat, and no one is really addressing the problem that I spent my time in prison as retribution for,” she said Monday. [https://apnews.com/article/colorado-election-clerk-peters-prison-release-b974d394595c75a6db831962551d094f]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] [[James Talarico]] leads [[Republican]] [[Ken Paxton]] by 47-44%''' [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5902035-texas-senate-race-poll/] in a race deciding which party controls the [[U.S. Senate]]. [https://christopherrufo.com/p/ken-paxton-vs-james-talarico] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Axios]]'': [[Trump]] tears into [[Netanyahu]]''' over [[Lebanon]] strikes. [https://www.axios.com/2026/06/01/trump-netanyahu-israel-lebanon-call]'' 'You'd be in prison if not for me...Everyone hates [[Israel]] because of this'.'' [https://youtu.be/CD_TPZ5KjPo][https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/trump-lashes-out-at-bibi] [[Iran]] suspends talks over [[US]]/[[Israel]] [[ceasefire]] breaches. [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/bombing-while-talking]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hundreds of thousands in [[atheistic]] [[London]] turn out to celebrate the &amp;quot;[[Bible]] Brothers&amp;quot;''' (Arsenal) [[soccer]] [[Premier League]] championship. [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq5px7jv92eo] ''The [[NFL]] cannot draw a crowd that large''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Just the News]]'': [[Democrat]] [[populist]] [[Graham Platner]]'''’s wife says she's ‘really angry’ his extramarital sexting was publicly disclosed. [https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/graham-platners-wife-says-shes-really-angry-his-extramarital-sexting-was][https://www.frontpagemag.com/communist-nazi-maine-senate-candidate-cheated-on-his-wife-on-app-with-child-sex-problem/][https://themainemonitor.org/platner-reddit-comments/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Times of India]]'': [[Zelensky]] attacks [[ZNPP|nuclear power plant]] again.''' [https://youtu.be/JRT8jmhBc60]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also [[Main Page/Archive index|Previous Conservapedia Breaking News]]''.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Strait_of_Hormuz&amp;diff=2199309</id>
		<title>Strait of Hormuz</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Strait_of_Hormuz&amp;diff=2199309"/>
		<updated>2026-07-14T02:05:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Until Feb. 28, 2026 ... 'traversed' - past tense because it's currently less than 5%&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Strait of Hormuz.jpg|250px|thumb|Strait of Hormuz]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Strait of Hormuz''' is a narrow international waterway connecting the [[Persian Gulf]] to the [[Arabian Sea]]. [[Iran]] lies to the north of the strait, while an exclave of [[Oman]] and the [[United Arab Emirates]] lie to the south. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This strait is the bottleneck for the world's oil supply. Until Feb. 28, 2026, roughly 20% of the world's total liquid petroleum consumption, about 20 million barrels daily, traversed this Strait. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[United States]] and other nations have tended to keep naval forces near the Strait to safeguard passage there, but in the 2026 war against Iran the [[Trump 2.0|Second Trump Administration]] was unable to keep the Strait open for safe passage.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:E623c16e-9dab-4af5-af3f-264325e4f5f5 627x680.jpg|250px|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Middle East]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Seas of the Indian Ocean]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:oil]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2199308</id>
		<title>Template:Mainpageright</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2199308"/>
		<updated>2026-07-14T02:02:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: remove stray mark&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;__NOTOC__&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;width:45%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:47%; border: #ff0000 solid 1px; -moz-bord'''Seter-radius: 10px; background: lightgrey; margin-bottom: 0.4em;&amp;quot;/]&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;-moz-border-radius-topright: .10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; background: #00a2ff; text-align:; font-size: 100%; padding: 3px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;nounderlines&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;font style=&amp;quot;trebuchet ms&amp;quot; color=&amp;quot;# 00ccff&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Welcome to Conservapedia!&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;'''America takes over the [[Strait of Hormuz]].''' The US will resume its naval blockade of ships going to and from Iranian ports at 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday. [https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/13/world/live-news/iran-war-trump]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Christ]]-centered great [[Lionel Messi]] faces off Wednesday against [[chess]]-playing Englishman Harry Kane''', in the most expensive [[World Cup]] game played yet. [https://www.aljazeera.com/sports/2026/7/13/argentina-vs-england-world-cup-tickets-more-expensive-than-france-vs-spain] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Spain]]'s phenomenal just-turned-19-year-old [[World Cup]] soccer star Yamal declines to get any [[tattoo]]s''', in compliance with the ban on body art in [[Islam]]. [https://www.instagram.com/p/DaUtDVRk-mI/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Monstrous war appropriations bill is stalled, and may not pass before adjournment''', due to the prolonged hospitalization of the elderly Sen. [[Mitch McConnell]] (R-KY) who chairs the subcommittee. [https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5961915-mcconnell-absence-trump-defense-spending/] [[Laura Loomer]]: McConnell is brain dead on life support. [https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/2074281550535934173]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Richard Sakwa]]: [[Russophobia]] is leading us toward [[war]].''' [[Glenn Diesen]]. [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/richard-sakwa-russophobia-is-leading]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Neocon]] Sen. [[Lindsey Graham]] (R-SC) abruptly dies''' less than 4 months from his reelection, reportedly from an aortic dissection (which is often from heart disease). [https://justthenews.com/government/congress/medical-examiner-district-columbias-preliminary-findings-grahams-death-released] Graham's sister tapped to finish his term. [https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/holdmcmaster-names-blank-succeed-lindsey-graham]  ''Neocon [[Nikki Haley]], [[conservative]] [[Nancy Mace]] bypassed.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukrainian]] [[dictator]] [[Volodymyr Zelensky]]''' extends [[martial law]], cancels [[election]]s again. ''[[Russia]] to hold elections in September.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for [[crony capitalism]]''': Fox's boring announcers and too many commercials cause [[American]]s to flee to [[Spanish]] broadcasts of the [[World Cup]], setting all-time viewership records there. [https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/world-cup-telemundo-peacock-record-ratings-universo-1236807254/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''More job losses: wealthy [[Microsoft]] lays off 4,800''' employees while it spends $190 billion on [[AI]]. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/as-microsoft-lays-off-4800-employees-hr-head-amy-colemans-memo-has-a-direct-line-for-all-the-employees-the-jobs-are-not-being-replaced-by-ai-but-/amp_articleshow/132326446.cms][https://www.thedailydoom.com/p/the-deeper-dive-employment-data-and]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Where's the [[environmentalist]] outrage???''' &amp;quot;Planned [[Texas]] [[data center]]s could emit more [[greenhouse gas]]es than many countries.&amp;quot; [https://www.texastribune.org/2026/07/09/texas-data-centers-ai-power-plants-pollution-state-permits/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Robert Pape]]: [[Escalation]] (again).''' [https://youtu.be/ALCFBWpQwrA] [[Douglas Macgregor]]: Disastrous [[NATO]] Summit - Renewed [[war]] on [[Iran]] &amp;amp; [[Russia]]. [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/douglas-macgregor-disastrous-nato][https://youtu.be/mcp-pYYs_T8] [[ATACMS]] in [[Kuwait]], logistical support for US aircraft carriers in [[Oman]] hit. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-attacks-jordan-kuwait-oman-and-qatar-with-drones-and-missiles-after-us-strikes/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Stephen Bryen]]: [[Ukraine]] wants to produce [[Patriot missile|Patriot interceptors]]''' but there are problems. [https://weapons.substack.com/p/ukraine-wants-to-produce-patriot] ''[[The War Zone]]'': Ukrainian-built [[Patriot missile]]s won't be defending the country's skies anytime soon. [https://www.twz.com/land/ukraine-built-patriot-missiles-wont-be-defending-the-countrys-skies-anytime-soon] ''[[Responsible Statecraft]]'': Ukraine wants to make its own Patriot missiles. That's a bad idea. [https://responsiblestatecraft.org/patriot-missile-system-ukraine/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukraine]] [[TCC|press gangs]]''' stir [[riot]]s in [[Lviv]]. [https://armedforces.press/the-ukraine-war/2026/07/10/ukraine-farce-lviv-draft-clash-prompts-criminal-probes-and-military-self-review-as-bounty-hunters-encite-rage-among-ukrainians/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Troy Jackson, Shenna Bellows, and Nirav Shah emerge as the most likely replacements for [[Maine]] [[Dem]] [[U.S. Senate|Senate]] nominee''', anti-war [[Graham Platner]], who was forced out by the pro-war [[Establishment]]. [https://prospect.org/2026/07/09/three-likely-replacements-for-graham-platner-maine-senate-democrats/] ''The anti-war candidate -- Nirav Shah -- is the least likely to be picked by Dem insiders''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''BREAKING: [[baseball]] [[sports gambling]] scandal in [[Philly]]''': &amp;quot;FanDuel Used [[Bryce Harper]] To Allegedly Prey On [[Gambling]] [[addiction|Addict]] Who Lost $1.5 Million On Bets.&amp;quot; [https://brobible.com/sports/article/fanduel-used-bryce-harper-prey-gambling-addict/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Daily Caller]]'': OK [[Boomer]]: [[Neocon]]s used landline''' phones to poll young [[MAGA]] [[voter]]s. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/07/09/neocons-landline-phones-poll-young-maga-voters-trump-america-first-gen-z/] ''No, [[GenZ]]ers do not support [[warmonger]]ing''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] [[Presbyterian Church]]''' votes to recognize [[Gaza]] genocide. [https://pres-outlook.org/2026/07/assembly-declares-israels-war-in-gaza-a-genocide/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[MP]] from [[NATO]] ally [[Finland]]''' blocked from entering NATO ally [[UK]] for quoting [[Bible]]. [https://slaynews.com/finnish-lawmaker-blocked-entering-uk-quoting-bible/] ''Shared values of [[the West]]?''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Liberal media]] and [[Establishment]] [[Dem]]s force the anti-war [[populist]] [[Platner]] to quit''', even though he won his primary by a landslide. [https://apnews.com/article/maine-senate-graham-platner-48d472ac4a043792032f3e3f5a33ef1b][https://youtu.be/HpoV8s0AJXI]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Brazil]]ian couple face prison sentence for [[homeschooling]]''' their children [https://nypost.com/2026/07/08/world-news/brazil-parents-face-prison-sentence-for-homeschooling-after-court-accuses-them-of-intellectual-neglect/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Oil]] up 5%, [[Dow]] drops 500''' pts after [[Trump]] declares MOU dead. [https://apnews.com/article/stocks-rates-oil-iran-ai-671d9c94b302f7db533f46baa18387d3][https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/07/war-on-iran-both-sides-declare-their-mou-to-be-ineffective.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UniParty]] coordinates with unelected''' [[dictator]] [[Zelensky]] at [[NATO]] Summit. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/07/08/uniparty-senators-and-mike-turner-take-trip-to-turkey-nato-summit-to-coordinate-with-zelenskyy/?lctg=66158495]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Young men are losing millions of dollars daily on [[World Cup]] [[gambling]]''', as the volume wagered on [[Kalshi]] is exceeding a billion dollars per day. [https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/world-cup-drives-prediction-market-134200137.html] ''The man who betrayed [[Bible]] translator [[William Tyndale]] had lost his inheritance to gambling''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] reneges sanctions relief'''. [https://justthenews.com/world/middle-east/united-states-revokes-license-authorizing-sale-iranian-oil] [[Iran war]] resumes. [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/resumption-of-war-on-iran] Trump strikes [[Kharg Island]]. [https://youtu.be/uNigYi8VT7E] [[Prof Pape]]: Situation Report. [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/situation-report-special-edition-3e1] [[US]] hits 80 targets in [[Iran]], Iran retaliates and hits 85 US military assets. [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/update-american-military-assets-under]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukraine]] stored [[depleted uranium]]''' in populated areas. [https://youtu.be/DZnuTtx52kQ]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Liberal media]] is getting every high-profile [[Dem]] to abandon [[Platner]]''', and even his initial supporter [[Stephen King]] now says &amp;quot;he wasn't 'defending [[Platner]].'&amp;quot; [https://www.wmtw.com/article/maine-author-stephen-king-defends-graham-platner-amid-assault-allegations/71847957]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Bernie Sanders]] caves into the [[Establishment]] by urging [[Platner]] to drop out''', demonstrating the futility of the [[progressives]] as they bow to the [[liberal media]]. [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jul/07/graham-platner-democrats-senate-maine-trump-nato-us-politics-latest-news-updates]                                                                                                             &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Liberal]]s try to force anti-war [[Platner]] to withdraw by the July 13th deadline''' despite his winning the [[Dem]] primary by a landslide, and publicize an accusation of [[sexual assault]] which he categorically denies. [https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/07/06/ex-girlfriend-accuses-graham-platner-of-sexual-assault/] '''Update:''' Platner suspends campaign. [https://unherd.com/newsroom/new-platner-allegations-are-a-test-of-democrats-moral-limits/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[WSJ]]'': 'There is no going back': The inside story''' of [[Europe]]'s rupture w/ [[America]]. [https://archive.is/1Rp9v#selection-2142.0-2157.75]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Exit [[Mitch McConnell]]''', enter Abdul El-Sayed. [https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/exit-mitch-mcconnell-enter-abdul] ''[[Elaine Chao|McConnell's wife]] leaves country; [[Democrat]]s leave old school [[politics]].''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Federal Reserve]] says [[Biden border crisis]]''' made housing rise 30%. [https://justthenews.com/government/security/fed-reserve-working-paper-suggests-biden-illegal-immigrant-wave-drove-home] ''[[Democrat]]s call it [[Stimulus]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Phenomenal [[Kylian Mbappe]] has wit along with his [[Christian]] [[faith]]''', in his response to the &amp;quot;ugly football&amp;quot; by [[Paraguay]] whom he defeated with a penalty kick: &amp;quot;We can also get our hands dirty, we know how to do it. ... Guess they were thinking we were going to show up in tuxedos, but we were ready.&amp;quot; [https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/49272367/france-kylian-mbappe-paraguay-tactics-get-our-hands-dirty]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Out-of-touch [[United States Independence Day|Independence Day]] political campaigning''': poll shows that 61% of [[Gen Z]] -- the swing vote in 4 months -- do not even know what this 250th anniversary is celebrating. [https://thehill.com/polls/5953222-july-4th-ignorance-among-americans/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[NYT]]'' lies''' about [[Russian]] and [[Ukrainian]] casualties. [https://sonar21.com/the-ny-times-lies-about-russian-and-ukrainian-casualties/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Data center]] halted in [[Wyoming]]''' for spreading a rare metal-resistant bacterium into [[Cheyenne (city)|Cheyenne]]'s reclamation water supply. [https://share.google/Ga0IPjtsuHSZhs9vu] Constant noise from a [[Wisconsin]] [[Microsoft]] [[data center]] was initially mistaken as coming from a freight train engine! [https://www.jsonline.com/story/money/business/2026/07/02/microsoft-sued-by-wisconsin-residents-for-noise-from-data-center/90786863007/] ''MSFT has approval for 14 more there''. 8,000 polluting diesel generators in mostly residential [[Virginia]] are poised to turn on for [[data center]]s, as summer heat strains the grid. [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/01/data-center-boom-collides-with-record-heat-testing-power-grid-00983009]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''A [[secular]], non-religious [[Form of Solemnization of Matrimony|wedding ceremony]] for [[Taylor Swift]]''' at [[Madison Square Garden]]. ''Where's the meaning without any [[religion]]?''                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;The old [[politics]] are gone&amp;quot;''': [[conservative]] [[Steve Bannon]] bluntly explains the [[socialist]] takeover, and how the [[Establishment]] is clueless. &amp;quot;If you just sit there and demonize, that’s certainly not enough.&amp;quot; [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/02/the-old-politics-are-gone-steve-bannon-on-the-democratic-socialist-wave-00985060 ''Politico'']&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Times of Israel]]'': Thousands gather at Hostages Square''' in [[Tel Aviv]] to demand a state commission of inquiry into the failures surrounding the onslaught and massacre. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/we-wont-give-up-crowd-marking-1000-days-since-oct-7-vows-to-keep-demanding-state-inquiry/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''June &amp;quot;was the slowest month of hiring since February&amp;quot;''', as wage growth and hiring sputter. [https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/june-jobs-report-stable-hiring-rcna352603] 9 days of [[sour crude]] remain to make [[diesel]] in the [[Strategic Petroleum Reserve]]. [https://sonar21.com/only-9-days-of-sour-crude-left-in-the-us-spr/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Another [[socialist]] -- an opponent of giving military arms to [[Israel]] -- defeats a 15-term [[Dem]] congressional incumbent''', this time in [[Denver]]. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5945886-diana-degette-loses-relelection-bid/] ''The [[Dem]] [[Establishment]] is collapsing, while disapproval of [[Republican]] incumbents is high too''. [[Klippenstein]]: Dinosaur [[Democrat]]s meet asteroid. [https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/dinosaur-democrats-meet-asteroid]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Pulte]] cleans house at [[ODNI]].''' [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/07/03/report-acting-dni-bill-pulte-fires-dozens-of-odni-staff-for-politicizing-intelligence-insubordination-gross-misconduct/][https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/23/acting-dni-pulte-removes-51-from-agency-six-fired-and-45-sent-back-to-their-home-agencies/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''5-4 [[SCOTUS]] declares [[birthright citizenship]] a constitutional right''', turning the future of the [[U.S.]] over to the voting power of [[illegal aliens]]' children. ''[[John Roberts|Roberts]], [[Amy Coney Barrett|Barrett]], [[Brett Kavanaugh|Kavanaugh]] vote with [[liberal]]s.'' [https://technofog.substack.com/p/supreme-court-upholds-birthright]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Czech]] [[Political party|party]] seeks to strip [[Zelensky]] of nation's top honor''' after the [[Ukrainian]] [[dictator]] named a [[military]] unit after a [[Volhynia Massacre|Nazi collaborator]]. [https://www.politico.eu/article/russia-suspends-railway-border-crossings-finland-baltic-neighbors/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Nuclear]] [[weapon]]s ban''' lifted in [[Finland]]; [https://www.politico.eu/article/finland-lifts-nuclear-weapons-ban-nato-security-shift/] [[Russia]] seals border with [[Finland]] &amp;amp; [[Baltic States]]. [https://kyivindependent.com/russia-to-halt-multiple-railway-checkpoints-on-borders-with-finland-estonia-latvia/] ''[[Black Sea]] becomes warzone.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Buckingham Palace]] drops 500-year 'Defender of the Faith' '''from [[Charles III|King Charles]] job title. [https://www.rt.com/news/642356-king-charles-loses-defender-of-faith/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;[[Texas]] education board votes to make [[Bible]] passages required reading&amp;quot;''' [https://abcnews.com/GMA/News/texas-education-board-votes-make-bible-passages-required/story?id=134246001] but omits the most beneficial, life-changing passages to appease [[liberal]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Double standard]] for women who have [[abortion]]s is ending''': Dozens of women leaders and others endorse criminal penalties for mothers who abort. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/riley-gaines-abby-johnson-60-others-back-criminal-penalties-for-women-who-get-abortions/?utm_source=latest_news]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Pride month]] proclamation defeated in [[Maine]]''', for the first time by York County commissioners. [https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/news/local/lgbtq/york-county-rejects-pride-proclamation-maine-lgbtq/97-0e663938-ee1c-435b-96f7-648e11b8f2cd]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''3 million drop [[ObamaCare]]''' in just one year. [https://apnews.com/article/affordable-care-act-obamacare-health-subsidies-premiums-3dc9a0cd249a7622ce31e8559bfff729]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Zelensky]] and [[NATO]]''' promise 40-day '[[campaign of terrors]]' prior to [[Russian]] [[election]]s. [https://sonar21.com/ukraines-desperate-propaganda-campaign-while-russia-advances-along-the-entire-front/] ''[[Ukraine]] cancelled all [[democratic]] elections more than 2 years ago.'' [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-calls-ukraines-zelenskyy-dictator-without-elections-rift-widens] 237 injured, 42 killed in [[NATO]] attacks. [https://tass.com/politics/2153327][https://tass.com/politics/2153349] [[Russian]] [[parliament]] threatens NATO factories arming [[Ukraine]]. [https://unn.ua/en/news/in-the-russian-state-duma-they-threatened-strikes-on-factories-in-europe-that-produce-weapons-for-ukraine]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''With [[provocation]]s, [[drone]] attacks, and''' [[Britain]] and [[France]] seizing tankers, [[Russia]] arms oil tankers. [https://x.com/Globalsurv/status/2071561575173931440]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Transition Protocol: [[Saudi]]s tell [[US]]''' to get out; [https://youtu.be/0Yh3PCllz-0] [[Israel]] plans attack on [[Ayatollah]]'s funeral. [https://youtu.be/hqM7lHJUaTw]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Persian Gulf]] [[ceasefire]] violated.''' [https://youtu.be/kxKS2RwD5FI]. [[Trump]] strikes 'obliterated' [[Iranian]] [[military]] sites again.  [https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2071029590932258941] [[WION]]: [[Trump]]'s [[Iran war]] casualties: Major damage to [[US Navy|US Naval]] base. [https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0r67G5t0Cn0?feature=share][https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-s-iran-war-secrets-major-damage-to-us-naval-base-1782500227892] [https://youtu.be/5wmZT-WnT9c TOI] ''[[WaPo]]'': [[Israel]] '[[sabotaging]]' [[US]] attempts at 'lasting [[peace]]' with [[Iran]]. [https://thealtworld.com/anthony_cartalucci/washington-post-claims-israel-sabotaging-us-attempts-at-lasting-peace-with-iran]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[BBC]]: 8 [[Antifa]] [[extremist]]s''' get combined 450 years in anti-[[ICE]] '[[peace]]ful protest'. [https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/eight-people-alleged-ties-antifa-000019819.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Senate]] [[Dem]] wants new Dem leadership''':  &amp;quot;The old models are no longer working, and that includes the [[Democratic Party]],” Sen. [[Elissa Slotkin]] (D-Mich.) declared. [https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5941463-slotkin-democrat-leadership-change/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Washington, D.C.|D.C.]] [[Dem]]s &amp;quot;are freaking out''' about [[progressive]]s’ winning streak.&amp;quot; [[Establishment]] Dems &amp;quot;fear they’re on the verge of losing the party’s ideological civil war,&amp;quot; ''Politico'' [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/25/progressive-moderate-democratic-party-battlegrounds-00975000 reports][https://jimtreacher.substack.com/p/dems-panic-about-commie-infiltrators]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dr Brovkin]]: [[Russia]] warns [[NATO]]''' - [[Zelensky]] has crossed the point of no return. [https://youtu.be/Cq6z32cc5Wo]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Korybko]]: Is [[Trump 2.0]]'s '[[escalation]]' [[strategy]]''' against [[Russia]] starting to take shape? [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-20s-escalation-strategy-against-russia-starting-take-shape] [[Mearsheimer]]:  Russia has red lines &amp;amp; [[nuclear weapon]]s. [https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/russia-has-red-lines-and-nuclear] [[Lavrov]] vs [[Rubio]]: Who's telling the [[truth]] about the '[[Spirit of Anchorage]]'? [https://korybko.substack.com/p/lavrov-vs-rubio-whos-telling-the][https://youtu.be/eDg4YHtlJ3g]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] member [[Netherlands]] [[euthanize]]s 12 year old.''' [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/netherlands-just-euthanized-a-12]'' [[Western civilization|Western]] [[values]]?''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Alastair Crooke]]: [[Russia]] re-introducing fear''' on the world's stage. [https://youtu.be/P2N9xpZFCCs] [[Peskov]]: [[Nuclear]] [[deterrence theory|deterrence]] only force preventing global war. [https://www.newsy-today.com/russia-nuclear-weapons-are-the-only-deterrent-to-global-war/][https://youtu.be/Ew9XMVsMKXg]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Global [[food]] [[crisis]] update: [[Russian]] [[farm]]s shutting down''' because they can't get [[diesel]] as a result of [[NATO]]/[[Ukraine]] attacks on refineries. [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/global-food-crisis-russias-farmers] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] and [[Oman]] sign framework''' for [[Hormuz Strait]] governance. [https://www.roic.ai/news/iran-and-oman-forge-joint-framework-for-strait-of-hormuz-governance-06-12-2026]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump%27s_inept_advisers#John_Bolton|Trump inept advisor John Bolton]]''' who advocated [[war]] with [[Iran]] in 2019 pleads guilty to mishandling classified information. [https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/210438/john-bolton-donald-trump-guilty-plea]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Zerohedge]]'': Small plane hits [[Beijing]]'s tallest tower;''' was someone sending [[China]] a message? [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/small-plane-hits-beijings-tallest-tower-was-someone-sending-china-message]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Starmer]] to give enriched [[uranium]]''' to [[Ukraine]]. [https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/uk-to-guarantee-enriched-uranium-supplies-to-ukraine] [[Putin]]: [[NATO]] is openly planning [[war]]. [https://youtu.be/ho8Ti1QA37o][https://youtu.be/fUzLJJrt3Hc][https://thealtworld.com/andrew_korybko/whats-the-likelihood-of-a-nato-russian-clash-around-2030] [[Tootie Fruiti O'Rutte]] at the [[White House]]. [https://youtu.be/Pg_5_IrwObw][https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/24/nato-general-secretary-mark-rutte-gives-remain-in-nato-pitch-to-president-trump-in-white-house/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Left-wing]] [[populist]]s''' smashed [[incumbent]]s in Tuesday [[primaries]]. But can they govern? [https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/how-do-you-beat-an-oligarchy-one] Official [[DSA]] platform calls for abolishing the [[Senate]], the [[Presidency]], the [[Supreme Court]],&lt;br /&gt;
and more. [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/official-platform-democratic-socialists-america-dsa-includes-abolishing/] [[Van Jones]]: [[Mamdani]] is not alone. [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2026/06/23/van-jones-left-is-on-the-march-democratic-socialists-are-an-insurgency-this-is-a-serious-movement/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Democratic party]] [[establishment]]''' facing reckoning after [[far-left]]ists win power. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/24/democratic-party-establishment-zohran-mamdani-dsa-new-york-candidates-victories-win-hakeem-jeffries-israel/] [[Trump]] [[hate]]r [[Dan Goldman]] defeated, 65% - 35%. [https://www.bitchute.com/video/3RI7dwdMhq01] [[Hakeem Jeffries|Sorry, Hakeem,]] but the [[revolution]] always eats its own. [https://stateoftheday.us/p/sorry-hakeem-but-the-revolution-always] '' 'You’re next!' the [[socialist]]s yell.'' [https://youtu.be/FbI6a4D88po] ''[[Conservative Treehouse]]'': ‘[[Occupy Wall Street]]’ now officially controls the [[Democrat party]]. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/24/occupy-wall-street-now-officially-controls-the-democrat-party/]&lt;br /&gt;
---- &lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for monstrous [[data centers]]''': banned by 3 counties on Tuesday in [[Florida]]! [https://wiod.iheart.com/featured/florida-news/content/2026-06-24-3-florida-counties-ban-ai-data-centers-in-one-day/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Responsible Statecraft]]: [[Trump]] ended his [[idiot]]ic [[Iran war]].''' Good. [https://responsiblestatecraft.org/trump-ends-war-critics/] [[Finian Cunningham ]]: [[Trump]]’s [[Iran war]] debacle is ominous for [[Russia]]. [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/trumps-iran-war-debacle-is-ominous-for-russia]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': [[MLB]] players are '''''not''''' required to wear [[Pride month]] logos, and teams are suppose to tell them that. The [[San Francisco]] Giants failed to tell them, the MLB admits. [https://www.mlb.com/news/commissioner-rob-manfred-responds-to-letter-from-senator-josh-hawley] [[LGBTQ+]] community begs [[Liberal corporate tyranny|woke corporation]]s to stop 'helping' before they ruin baseball forever. [https://www.dailyskrape.com/lgbtq-community-begs-woke-corporations-to-stop-helping-before-they-ruin-baseball-forever/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[JD Vance]] infuriates [[neocon]]s.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/j-d-vance-infuriates-the-neocons/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Starmer]] out -''' World breathes sigh of relief. [https://patricklancasternewstoday.substack.com/p/breaking-keir-starmer-resigns-what] ''With 5 million [[children]] hungry,'' [https://labourlist.org/2026/02/tackling-poverty-legacy-keir-starmer/][https://archive.is/I8kCX] ''Starmer sends another $1 Billion to [[corrupt]] [[Zelensky regime]].'' [https://www.kyivpost.com/post/78478] [[UK]] [[Storm Shadow]] hits Voronezh. [https://www.military-stuff.org/total-war-storm-shadow-hits-voronezh-lyman-konstantinovka-fall-military-summary-2026-06-22/] Update: [[Farage]] demands snap election. [https://humanevents.com/2026/06/22/nigel-farage-demands-snap-election-after-keir-starmer-resigns]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukraine]] tries to drone [[Scott Ritter]]''' in [[Russia]]. [https://youtu.be/SVQl6Uzg8J8]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] [[Treasury Secretary Bessent]] on [[Zelensky]]:''' 'the little f--- acts like Mr. Bean on [[crack]].' [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/20/scott-bessent-volodymyr-zelenskyy-trump][https://youtu.be/cD3iGmNii9E]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Seymour Hersh]]: [[Trump]] break with [[Bibi]].''' [https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/trump-breaks-with-bibi]] ''[[Times of Israel]]'': [[Trump]] calls [[Netanyahu]] a 'conman'. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-told-carlson-musk-in-early-2025-that-he-wouldnt-attack-iran-report/] ''[[WSJ]]'': 'Trump makes the [[Jew]]ish [[state]] the [[scapegoat]]'. [https://www.wsj.com/opinion/iran-and-trump-blame-israel-first-a122a0d7] [[Macgregor]]: 'I fear for Trump's safety.' [https://youtu.be/B8Ej6IOjDPc][https://youtu.be/uTd1yNfie_8]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Araghchi]]: Talks delivered 'major progress' '''to end Lebanon war. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/vance-switzerland-high-stakes-iran-talks-get-underway-what-we-know-so-far]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Major rupture between [[US]]-[[Israel]]''' as [[Trump]] grows exasperated w/ [[Netanyahu]]'s bloodletting. [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/major-rupture-between-us-israel-as] ''Trump reveals oil reserves about to run out, 'bedlam' would ensue.'' [[Strategic oil reserve]] nears collapse… [[US]] must choose: [[guns or butter]]. [https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/strategic-oil-reserve-nears-collapse] ''US has roughly a 12-day supply left.  [[Trump]] must decide to give the [[military]] jet fuel or the trucking industry [[diesel]]. This is the main reason Trump signed the MoU with [[Iran]].'' &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[German]] opposition demands [[reparations]] from [[Ukraine]]''' for [[Nordstream pipeline]] [[terrorist]] attack. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/the-afd-co-leaders-demand-for-ukrainian] ''[[Liberal]] [[globalist]]s hell bent on [[strategic defeat]] of [[Russia]] through [[NATO]] [[proxy war]].''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[DNI Tulsi Gabbard]] releases evidence''' [[Anthony Fauci]] manipulated intelligence and [[lied]] to [[Congress]]. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/19/dni-tulsi-gabbard-releases-evidence-anthony-fauci-manipulated-intelligence-and-lied-to-congress/] ''It's time you know the [[truth]].'' [https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/2067792184753938484] Fauci subpoenaed.[https://justthenews.com/government/congress/rand-paul-subpoenas-fauci-testimony-covid-origin-probe]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''5 years post-[[covid]], [[Public school|public middle schoolers]]''' still can’t read or do math. [https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/22/5-years-post-covid-public-middle-schoolers-still-cant-read-or-do-math/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''A [[data center]] generates noise as loud as a refrigerator''', an outraged town is told by their mayor. [https://www.nj.com/business/2026/06/a-tiny-nj-borough-approved-a-18b-ai-data-center-now-its-residents-are-fighting-back.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Another [[socialist]] wins to become a big city ([[Washington, D.C.|D.C.]]) [[mayor]]''' [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/18/lewis-george-dc-mayor-primary-00966879] while [[GOP]] leaders are perceived to pander to [[oligarchs]] and foreign interests.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Mearsheimer]] &amp;amp; [[Parsi]]: Will the deal hold?''' [https://youtu.be/okSltilmp-o]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Vice President Vance]]: '[[Israel]] needs to wake up''' and smell the [[reality]].' [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/watch-mic-drop-press-briefing-vance-goes-israeli/] ''[[WaPo]]'': [[CIA]] warns [[Israel]] will do everything to undermine [[Trump]] [[peace]]. [https://archive.is/gP2xE] [[Regime change]]? [https://youtu.be/_2IiQLb1uTY] Report: [[Trump 2.0|Trump admin]] working to oust [[Netanyahu]]. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/report-us-officials-working-to-establish-informal-channels-with-israels-opposition/][https://youtu.be/5MWvoRgKRfk] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] Rape Gang Inquiry Report: [[Starmer]] let 13,000''' suspected rapists off as UK girls were systemically victims of [[grooming gang]]s over 30 years. [https://humanevents.com/2026/06/17/revealed-starmer-let-13000-suspected-rapists-off-as-british-girls-were-systemically-raped-by-pakistani-rape-gangs-over-30-years-rape-gang-inquiry-report][https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/06/17/rape-gangs-new-report-exposes-how-woke-ideology-enabled-one-most-horrific-scandals-british-history/][https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf] ''250,000 victims.'' [[Musk]] supports [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal|Nuremberg-style trials]] after Inquiry release. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/musk-supports-nuremberg-style-trials-after-uk-rape-gang-inquiry-release] ''[[AP]]'': Starmer on the precipace of resignation. [https://apnews.com/article/britain-keir-starmer-future-burnham-labour-cc4567e307b4b3e6fbcb75c2c66a503c]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[BBC]]: [[Poland]] strips [[Zelensky]] of nations' highest honor''' after the [[Ukrainian]] [[dictator]] names [[military]] unit after [[Nazi]] who murdered [[Poles]]. [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr7xzg3dmj8o] [[Ukraine]] expected to pivot closer to [[Germany]] amidst its anti-[[Polish]] stance. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/ukraine-is-expected-to-pivot-closer] [[Russia]], [[Belarus]] on Germany's attempt to rewrite [[WWII]] history. [https://youtu.be/ag55YoEDLJA]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]]: No approval of [[FISA 702]]''' until [[Save America Act]] passed. [https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116764370070279119]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Max Blumenthal]]: [[Israel]] in panic.''' [https://youtu.be/gqGpIngzUis]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Judge Andrew Napolitano]]: A [[Republic]] or an [[Empire]]?''' [https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/19/a-republic-or-an-empire/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Alastair Crooke]]: A new [[Middle East]] is born''' &amp;amp; [[NATO]] attacks [[Moscow]]. [https://youtu.be/GkiCgI8QwiM] ''[[The Hill]]'': Pressure on [[Putin]] to strike back hard. [https://youtu.be/sSehsS9hPPM] '''Update:''' [[Zelensky]] gives [[Belarus]] 7-day ultimatum. [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/zelensky-gives-belarus-7-day-ultimatum] ''[[Drone]] attack on Moscow stuffed with [[kerosene]] mixtures to give [[Hollywood]] affect.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Belfast]] in flames.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/after-a-shocking-crime-in-belfast-ireland-wakes-up/][https://youtu.be/0iynCosZ0UE] ''[[Catholics]] &amp;amp; [[Protestant]]s unite to send [[immigrant]]s home.'' [https://youtu.be/E5Yn65VS0Rg] [[UK]] Minister for [[Northern Ireland]] says 'crackdown coming' against those who complain about beheading. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/12/britains-prime-minister-for-northern-ireland-says-a-crackdown-is-coming-against-those-who-complain-about-beheading/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] provocation: [[Starmer]] seizes tanker''' carrying [[Russian oil]] in [[English Channel]].  [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/14/facing-domestic-military-embarrassment-british-pm-starmer-orders-capture-of-russian-shadow-fleet-tanker/] ''Meanwhile, Starmer refuses to stop [[illegal immigrants]] from entering UK by boat.'' [https://youtu.be/Elp8kHtlQgc] ''[[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]]'': [[Russia]] ships [[oil]] at near record pace. [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-16/russia-s-oil-exports-near-record-pace-as-ukraine-s-drones-target-its-refineries]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] military intelligence''' deliberately provoked [[Catholic]]-[[Protestant]] [[violence]] in the 1980s. [https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/leaked-emails-reveal-british-intel]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[FTC]] charges [[Ukraine]] [[Big Tech|Tech]] giant''' with [[fraud|defrauding]] customers of billions. [https://kyivindependent.com/us-trade-regulator-accuses-billion-dollar-ukrainian-it-giant-of-fraud/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''$300 billion &amp;quot;reconstruction fund&amp;quot; is a big burden''' [https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5931551-vice-president-vance-switzerland-trip/] to put on [[taxpayer]]s who never supported this war. Much comes from tolls.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'''[[Pennsylvania]]ns Lose Record [[Gambling]] Sum''' In Single Month&amp;quot;: $626 million lost in May. [https://gamblingharm.org/pa-gambling-revenue-may-2026-record/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Worst summer job market for teenagers ever recorded''', due to &amp;quot;[[inflation]], [[oil]] prices and cautious hiring,&amp;quot;  reports [[AP]]. [https://apnews.com/article/teens-summer-jobs-unemployment-economy-5415ea134061119e6450b9de15300ba2]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Minimum wage laws drive teen unemployment''', reports ''[[Fortune magazine]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Teen summer jobs are at an 80-year low. Employers are hiring fewer young people, citing an experience gap and rising minimum wages that make inexperienced youth less attractive.&amp;quot; [https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryancraig/2026/06/19/why-summer-jobs-for-teens-are-vanishing-and-why-it-matters/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Underrated Sports Stars|Underrated Sports Star]] [[Kylian Mbappe]]''' -- &amp;quot;Everything that has happened to me has been a gift from [[God]]&amp;quot; -- will become the all-time [[World Cup]] top career scorer, and netted 2 for [[France]] in its opener. [https://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/article/who-has-most-goals-in-world-cup-history-heres-where-lionel-messi-kylian-mbappe-rank-all-time-after-opening-games-161623449.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'''[[MLB]] warns Giants players who wrote [[Bible]] verses''' on caps during ‘[[Pride Month|Pride Night]].’&amp;quot;[https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/mlb-warns-giants-players-who-wrote-bible-verses-caps-during-pride-night] ''They wrote [[Genesis, Chapter 9|Genesis 9:12-16]] - the real [[rainbow]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] ends [[blockade]],''' [[oil]] moving. [https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/hormuz-normalization-begins-saudi-supertankers-exit-and-flood-persian-gulf-oil-heads-asia][https://dpyne.substack.com/p/trump-accepts-all-irans-peace-demands] [[Tucker]] &amp;amp; [[Piers Morgan]]: [[Trump]] puts [[Bibi]] in his place as [[neocon]]s cry over [[peace]]. [https://youtu.be/kpKQKOHzPLU]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukrainian]] [[drone]] attack on bus carrying [[Belarus]]sian [[children]]''''s [[soccer]] team kills one, injures 4 children. [https://youtu.be/DnlfsiArCD4][https://humanevents.com/2026/06/17/woman-killed-children-injured-after-ukrainian-drone-strikes-bus-carrying-belarus-youth-soccer-team-in-russia]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[NYT]]'': [[Germany]] and [[Japan]] rearming''' 80 years after [[World War II]]. [https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/14/world/europe/germany-japan-rearmament-military.html] ''[[United_Nations#UN_Charter_Chapter_VII|UN Charter Cht VII]] gives the right of any major [[Allies of WWII|Ally of WWII]] to use force against former [[Axis Powers]] without [[Security Council]] approval.'' &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Berlin]] [[police]] beat [[Poles]]''' carrying cross to monument of [[Polish]] victims of [[WWII]]. [https://x.com/PiotrCieplucha/status/2066910971830956514] ''[[RT]]'': [[Germany]] misses [[Nazism]] – [[Lavrov]]. [https://www.rt.com/russia/641625-germany-misses-nazism-lavrov/] ''[[Berlin]]'s growing [[military]] partnership with [[Kiev]] shows its [[Nazi]] instincts never truly disappeared, the [[Russia]]n foreign minister said.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Kyiv]] [[police]] [[tear gas]] anti-[[draft]] protesters.''' [https://www.hindustantimes.com/videos/world-news/massive-riot-takes-control-of-kyivs-streets-over-zelenskys-forced-mobilisation-for-army-101781524849102.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dr Robert Malone]]: The [[neo-Nazi]] lovers''' of the Hate-Industrial Complex. [https://www.malone.news/p/the-neo-nazi-lovers-of-the-hate-industrial] ''[[SPLC]]: Can it get any weirder?''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Good news for the [[unborn]]''': [[Texas]] [[GOP]] votes to criminalize a mother's [[abortion]] of her child, as in taking the [[abortion pill]]. [https://www.statesman.com/news/politics/article/texas-gop-platform-2026-convention-22289377.php]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] used [[psychologist]]s''' to craft messages to [[Trump]]. [https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/iran-trump-psychologists-ceasefire-negotiations]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Netanyahu]] rejects [[Iran]] [[peace]] plan.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/iran-war-day-107-israel-bombs-beirut-imperiling-u-s-iran-peace-deal/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] rejects [[Trump]]'s request''' not to strike [[Israel]] in exchange for [[money]], saying its allies are not for sale. [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/is-this-why-trump-thinks-iranians] ''[[Zerohedge]]'': [[Pentagon]] officially elevates Israel's intelligence threat level to highest category. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/angry-pentagon-sources-leak-report-israels-unhinged-spying-us-officials][https://youtu.be/HZ_mu-r65og]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[France]]'s new 30-year-old [[conservative]] superstar''' Jordan Bardella is ahead to become its president next year, and he waves off any support by [[Trump]]. [https://www.politico.eu/article/frances-far-right-frontrunner-jordan-bardella-rejects-us-donald-trumps-backing/][https://youtu.be/YAhxwt7i5Mk]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Entire [[U.S.]] men's [[World Cup]] team thanked [[God]]''' on the field after their 4-1 victory over [[Paraguay]]: [https://www.instagram.com/p/DZh5y_Gh7xk/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''A grandfather with a shovel''' saves a young man from [[Zelensky]]'s [[TCC|conscription officers]]. [https://t.me/two_majors/77389] ''Another win for the tactical shovel.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Tulsi Gabbard]] exposes [[cover-up]] by [[Deep State]]''': 'new evidence of past [[U.S. funded biological labs abroad|US government funding for more than 120 biolabs]] in over 30 countries,' she reveals. [https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/2065440568423944607][https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/gabbard-releases-intelligence-showing-federal-government-has-funded-120][https://www.malone.news/p/dni-gabbard-reveals-evidence-of-us] [[Andrew Korybko]]: [[Laura Loomer]] &amp;amp; [[MAGA]] like her are wrong: 'MAGA Dissidents' aren’t a 'Russian influence op'. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/laura-loomer-and-maga-like-her-are]&lt;br /&gt;
---- ''&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Glenn Diesen]] interviews [[Mearsheimer]] &amp;amp; [[Karaganov]]: [[Nuclear war|Nuclear strike]]''' on [[Europe]] to restore [[Deterrence theory|deterrence]]. [https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/what-nuclear-taboo] [[Korybko]]: [[Putin]] rebuffs hawks who want to attack [[NATO]]. [https://thealtworld.com/andrew_korybko/putin-powerfully-rebuffed-the-hawks-who-want-him-to-attack-nato]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[The Intercept]]'': Top [[Pentagon]] official admits''' boat strike may have killed victims of [[human trafficking]]. [https://theintercept.com/2026/06/10/trump-boat-strikes-human-trafficking-victims/] ''No one would smuggle [[cocaine]] with 11 people on board their drug-running boat.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] top commander: '[[Russia]] not looking for conflict'.''' [https://www.ft.com/content/751d4555-9e8c-42a0-a37b-80893727776c] [[Ukrainian]]s beat [[TCC|Zelensky goons]] with axes and shovels. [https://t.me/rezident_ua/29662]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[U.S.]] men's [[World Cup]] team is outspokenly [[Christian]]''': &amp;quot;It's [[Bible]] time.&amp;quot; [https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jun/07/usmnt-religion-christian-pulisic-world-cup-2026]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': [[priest]] in [[Spain]] denies [[communion]] to a [[homosexual]] man in a [[same-sex marriage]], and doesn't waver amid [[liberal]] protests. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/faithful-priest-targeted-by-protesters-after-denying-married-homosexual-holy-communion/?utm_source=popular] '''Update:''' First [[Gay pride]] parade in [[Israel]] in 2 years. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/thousands-gather-as-lgbtq-pride-parade-kicks-off-in-tel-aviv-for-first-time-in-two-years/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] hits [[India]]n oil tanker''', [https://youtu.be/PsdFwjKE6hk] 3 Indian sailors killed; [https://x.com/sarbanandsonwal/status/2064965653749268514] [[India]] deploys [[nuke]]s for first time in history. [https://youtu.be/7sRN6hnzRxw] India signals rethink over [[West Asia]]. [https://www.indianpunchline.com/india-signals-rethink-over-west-asia/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] [[escalate]]s [[war]]''', [https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2064824143640502670] water treatment plant hit. [https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/iran-says-us-military-deliberately-struck-vital-civilian-water-infrastructure-in-south/3963183]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
''''The Art of The No Deal':''' [https://x.com/barnes_law/status/2059668005252952355] [[Trump]] cancels [[aggression]] against [[Iran]]. [https://www.nbcnews.com/world/iran/live-blog/live-updates-us-strikes-iran-trump-hormuz-closed-rcna349554]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] ally [[Erdoğan]]: [[Israel]]i actions''' in [[Syria]] and [[Lebanon]] threaten [[Turkiye]]. [https://greekcitytimes.com/2026/06/10/erdogan-greater-israel-threat-turkey-syria-lebanon-2026/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Mario Nawfal]] interviews [[Tucker Carlson]].''' [https://youtu.be/seaUXVin4Gw]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[DNI]] revokes [[Biden]]-era''' flawed and [[fraud]]ulent intelligence assessments. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/12/dni-tulsi-gabbard-aaron-lukas-revokes-biden-era-assessments-created-inside-weaponized-cia-analyst-system/] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Sports gambling]] pandemic splits [[Texas]] from the [[U.S.]]''', as a Texas court rules in favor of allowing the [[NCAA]]-banned Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby to play. On appeal, &amp;quot;all four judges are Texas Tech alums if you're wondering,&amp;quot; [[Associated Press|AP]] reports. [https://abcnews.com/Politics/wireStory/college-sports-suddenly-facing-major-question-hinges-gambling-133740336] ''&amp;quot;Don't mess with [[Texas]]&amp;quot;!!!!''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conservapedia proven right]], again: the [[liberal media]] and the [[Establishment]] lose in a landslide''' to [[Graham Platner]], 72%-28%, in the [[Maine]] [[Dem]] primary for [[U.S. Senate]]. [https://www.cnn.com/election/2026/primaries/maine?admin1=23&amp;amp;election-data-id=2026-SD&amp;amp;election-painting-mode=single-party-candidates&amp;amp;filter-key-races=false&amp;amp;filter-flipped=false&amp;amp;filter-remaining=false] ''[[Republican]]s face similar losses in the [[2026 midterm elections]], if they don't pivot soon''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Fun to read about''': the genuine, intelligent [[populist]] [[Progressive]], [[Graham Platner]], sharply rebukes the idiotic one, [[John Fetterman]]. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5915534-maine-senate-race-platner-fetterman/?tbref=hp]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[The American Conservative]]'': Is the [[Iran war]]''' tipping [[Persian Gulf|the Gulf]] away from the [[US]]?&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Israel]] defies [[Trump]]''' and attacks [[Iran]]. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/iran-fm-blames-us-contradictions-stalled-peace-talks-tehran-slaps-million-dollar][https://www.timesofisrael.com/defying-trump-israel-strikes-iranian-military-fuel-targets-iran-houthis-fire-missiles-at-israel/][https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/iran-war-israel-again-bombs-lebanon-defying-trump-and-killing-deal-middle-east-straits-as-foundations-for-new-security-architecture-alon-mizrahis-zionism-delenda-est-debate-over-oil-cliff-t.html] [[News Forensics]]: The Donald &amp;amp; Bibi Show. [https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/the-donald-and-bibi-show] ''Not a comedy''. [[Houthi]]s ban Israeli shipping through the Bab el-Mandeb. [https://youtu.be/8M3QHjXk-04]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Pentagon]] accuses [[Israel]] of spying''' on the [[Trump 2.0|Trump administration]]. [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-raised-threat-israeli-spying-us-highest-level-sources-say-rcna348565]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conflicts Forum]]: '[[Israel]] is sliding''' towards [[anarchy]]'. [https://azradale.substack.com/p/israel-is-sliding-towards-anarchy]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Sen Mark Warner]] kept the [[Russia hoax]] alive''' for a decade. Now he’s blocking Pulte, the man who could expose him. [https://youtu.be/1_kVEbEZDf4]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] elite fail in their out-all smears of [[Graham Platner]]''', the anti-war [[progressive]] opportunist in [[Maine]] campaigning against the [[Establishment]]. [https://abcnews.com/Politics/maine-democrats-divided-platner-stick-reluctantly/story][https://jimtreacher.substack.com/p/i-believe-lyndsey-fifield][https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/gop-aipac-centrist-dems-for-keeps-schumer-platner-el-sayed.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] shot down [[Apache helicopter]].''' [https://youtu.be/MBIH6L9x0bg] ''First Apache helicopter lost in [[Iran war|Iran conflict]].''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conservative populist]] Zach Lahn won a stunning upset over the [[Trump]]-endorsed favorite''' for the [[GOP]] nomination for [[Iowa]] governor. Lahn opposed [[data center]]s, was endorsed by MAHA, and by [https://x.com/SteaknShake/status/2062149779446980912?s=20 Steak 'n Shake!] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] gives [[Azov Nazi]]s [[AI]]-guided [[drone]]s''' &amp;amp; why these are not game-changers. [https://rumble.com/v7at8zy-us-gives-ukrainian-nazis-ai-guided-drones-and-why-these-are-not-game-change.html] [[Putin]] responds to latest [[NATO]]/[[Zelensky]] [[psyop]]. [https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/putins-message-to-ukraine-keep-on][https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/russia-at-the-crossroads-as-elites]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] elite do not want the [[progressive]] [[populist]] [[Graham Platner]] in the [[U.S. Senate]]'''. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5912815-madeleine-dean-on-platner-allegations/?tbref=hp]  Platner forcing [[Dems]] to reckon with 'Vote Blue No Matter Who'. [https://theintercept.com/2026/05/28/graham-platner-jake-auchincloss-democrats-maine-senate/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Robert Pape]]: The New Phase.''' [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/the-new-phase]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Just the News]]'':  More than a dozen [[House]] [[Republican]]s''' help [[Democrat]]s pass [[Ukraine aid]] package. [https://justthenews.com/government/congress/more-dozen-house-republicans-help-democrats-pass-ukraine-aid-package]. Pigs at the [[democracy]] trough. [https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/pigs-at-the-democracy-trough]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] walks out of interview''' with ''[[Meet the Press]]'' [[fake news]] anchor [[Kristen Welker]]. [https://youtu.be/eCryZlXg7Uk]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Republican]] senators in the key [[2026 midterm elections|midterm election]] races''' -- [[Maine]], [[Ohio]], and [[Alaska]] -- vote against [[Trump]] in connection with his new [[White House]] ballroom. [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/breaking-six-republican-senators-vote-democrats-block-construction/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Best of the public]], again''': a mere &amp;quot;qualifier&amp;quot;, someone who had to win 3 rounds to qualify as an unseeded player for the French Open, has reached the women's finals to the cheers of [[Poland]]. [https://apnews.com/article/french-open-women-semifinals-roland-garros-483dbbf0e39d1d6ad94ee5eb55f122e0]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for [[perpetual war]]''': the [[House]], including [[conservative]] [[Republican]]s, vote for a 60-day window to end the war against [[Iran]]. [https://apnews.com/article/iran-war-powers-vote-house-9aaadea35f9523c818802286a6553536]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] attacks [[St. Petersburg]].''' [https://marksleboda.substack.com/p/nato-transitions-to-a-long-term-dirty] Do [[Palantir]]’s bosses have blood on their hands over the [[Starobelsk massacre]]? [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/do-palantirs-bosses-have-blood-on-their-hands-over-the-starobelsk-massacre]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] [[cover up]] of catastrophic [[nuclear]] threat''' to [[Europe]] gives the heinous game away. [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/nato-cover-up-of-catastrophic-nuclear-threat-to-europe-gives-the-heinous-game-away]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''The normalization of [[chaos]]:''' How conflicts in [[Ukraine]] and [[Iran]] advance in the dark. [https://global21.substack.com/p/the-normalization-of-chaos-how-conflicts] [[Trump]]’s [[Iran]] trap: a [[war]] he can’t win, a [[peace]] he won’t make. [https://www.aaronmate.net/p/trumps-iran-trap-a-war-he-cant-win] The world after [[America]]. [https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/04/the-world-after-america/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Daily Caller]]'': [[Nazi]]-tattooed [[Senate]] candidate''' accused of physically abusing ex-girlfriend. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/04/graham-platner-maine-senate-race-alleged-abuse-ex-girlfriend/] [[Graham Platner]]’s accusers came forward. ''[[NYT]]'' fed them to the wolves. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/04/new-york-times-graham-platner-lyndsey-fifield-catch-and-kill-domestic-abuse/] Talarico &amp;amp; [[Platner]] unvetted. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/05/31/faiz-shakir-quibbles-pat-mchenry-nazi-graham-platner-tattoos-abc-news-this-week/][https://freebeacon.substack.com/p/totenkopf-tattooed-platner-admired]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Gilbert Doctorow]]: [[Religion]] and national identity.''' [https://gilbertdoctorow.substack.com/p/religion-and-national-identity]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': significant decline in approval of [[same-sex marriage]] and relationships, reports [[Gallup]]. [https://apnews.com/article/gallup-poll-same-sex-marriage-morality-e12acb151446ac1b7970c0825bf1d072]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Increasingly positive view of the [[Bible]] in the [[U.S.]]''', shifting from 2016 to 2024: 36% -&amp;gt; 48% say it's true, 37% -&amp;gt; 43% say it's helpful today, and 47% -&amp;gt; 51% of [[American]]s have read more than half the [[Bible]]. [https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/americans-judge-the-good-book-more-positively-but-still-often-by-its-cover/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] carries out large-scale attack''' and [[Trump]] maintains tactical silence. [https://global21.substack.com/p/iran-carries-out-large-scale-attack]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Candid criticism by [[Paraguay]] tennis player of a female umpire's failure to control the crowd in a tense match''': he is then slapped by [[liberal]]s with a massive fine. [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/06/01/french-open-fines-paraguays-vallejo-for-saying-a-woman-shouldnt-have-umpired-his-match/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Political prisoner [[Tina Peters]] released from jail by [[Colorado]] [[liberals]]''': &amp;quot;I know that the [[Democrat]]s are going to cheat, and no one is really addressing the problem that I spent my time in prison as retribution for,” she said Monday. [https://apnews.com/article/colorado-election-clerk-peters-prison-release-b974d394595c75a6db831962551d094f]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] [[James Talarico]] leads [[Republican]] [[Ken Paxton]] by 47-44%''' [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5902035-texas-senate-race-poll/] in a race deciding which party controls the [[U.S. Senate]]. [https://christopherrufo.com/p/ken-paxton-vs-james-talarico] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Axios]]'': [[Trump]] tears into [[Netanyahu]]''' over [[Lebanon]] strikes. [https://www.axios.com/2026/06/01/trump-netanyahu-israel-lebanon-call]'' 'You'd be in prison if not for me...Everyone hates [[Israel]] because of this'.'' [https://youtu.be/CD_TPZ5KjPo][https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/trump-lashes-out-at-bibi] [[Iran]] suspends talks over [[US]]/[[Israel]] [[ceasefire]] breaches. [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/bombing-while-talking]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hundreds of thousands in [[atheistic]] [[London]] turn out to celebrate the &amp;quot;[[Bible]] Brothers&amp;quot;''' (Arsenal) [[soccer]] [[Premier League]] championship. [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq5px7jv92eo] ''The [[NFL]] cannot draw a crowd that large''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Just the News]]'': [[Democrat]] [[populist]] [[Graham Platner]]'''’s wife says she's ‘really angry’ his extramarital sexting was publicly disclosed. [https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/graham-platners-wife-says-shes-really-angry-his-extramarital-sexting-was][https://www.frontpagemag.com/communist-nazi-maine-senate-candidate-cheated-on-his-wife-on-app-with-child-sex-problem/][https://themainemonitor.org/platner-reddit-comments/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Times of India]]'': [[Zelensky]] attacks [[ZNPP|nuclear power plant]] again.''' [https://youtu.be/JRT8jmhBc60]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also [[Main Page/Archive index|Previous Conservapedia Breaking News]]''.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2199307</id>
		<title>Template:Mainpageright</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2199307"/>
		<updated>2026-07-14T02:02:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: America takes over the Strait of Hormuz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;__NOTOC__&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;width:45%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:47%; border: #ff0000 solid 1px; -moz-bord'''Seter-radius: 10px; background: lightgrey; margin-bottom: 0.4em;&amp;quot;/]&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;-moz-border-radius-topright: .10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; background: #00a2ff; text-align:; font-size: 100%; padding: 3px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;nounderlines&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;font style=&amp;quot;trebuchet ms&amp;quot; color=&amp;quot;# 00ccff&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Welcome to Conservapedia!&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;'''America takes over the [[Strait of Hormuz]].''' The US will resume its naval blockade of ships going to and from Iranian ports at 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday. [&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/13/world/live-news/iran-war-trump]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Christ]]-centered great [[Lionel Messi]] faces off Wednesday against [[chess]]-playing Englishman Harry Kane''', in the most expensive [[World Cup]] game played yet. [https://www.aljazeera.com/sports/2026/7/13/argentina-vs-england-world-cup-tickets-more-expensive-than-france-vs-spain] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Spain]]'s phenomenal just-turned-19-year-old [[World Cup]] soccer star Yamal declines to get any [[tattoo]]s''', in compliance with the ban on body art in [[Islam]]. [https://www.instagram.com/p/DaUtDVRk-mI/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Monstrous war appropriations bill is stalled, and may not pass before adjournment''', due to the prolonged hospitalization of the elderly Sen. [[Mitch McConnell]] (R-KY) who chairs the subcommittee. [https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5961915-mcconnell-absence-trump-defense-spending/] [[Laura Loomer]]: McConnell is brain dead on life support. [https://x.com/LauraLoomer/status/2074281550535934173]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Richard Sakwa]]: [[Russophobia]] is leading us toward [[war]].''' [[Glenn Diesen]]. [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/richard-sakwa-russophobia-is-leading]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Neocon]] Sen. [[Lindsey Graham]] (R-SC) abruptly dies''' less than 4 months from his reelection, reportedly from an aortic dissection (which is often from heart disease). [https://justthenews.com/government/congress/medical-examiner-district-columbias-preliminary-findings-grahams-death-released] Graham's sister tapped to finish his term. [https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/holdmcmaster-names-blank-succeed-lindsey-graham]  ''Neocon [[Nikki Haley]], [[conservative]] [[Nancy Mace]] bypassed.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukrainian]] [[dictator]] [[Volodymyr Zelensky]]''' extends [[martial law]], cancels [[election]]s again. ''[[Russia]] to hold elections in September.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for [[crony capitalism]]''': Fox's boring announcers and too many commercials cause [[American]]s to flee to [[Spanish]] broadcasts of the [[World Cup]], setting all-time viewership records there. [https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/world-cup-telemundo-peacock-record-ratings-universo-1236807254/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''More job losses: wealthy [[Microsoft]] lays off 4,800''' employees while it spends $190 billion on [[AI]]. [https://www.google.com/amp/s/timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/as-microsoft-lays-off-4800-employees-hr-head-amy-colemans-memo-has-a-direct-line-for-all-the-employees-the-jobs-are-not-being-replaced-by-ai-but-/amp_articleshow/132326446.cms][https://www.thedailydoom.com/p/the-deeper-dive-employment-data-and]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Where's the [[environmentalist]] outrage???''' &amp;quot;Planned [[Texas]] [[data center]]s could emit more [[greenhouse gas]]es than many countries.&amp;quot; [https://www.texastribune.org/2026/07/09/texas-data-centers-ai-power-plants-pollution-state-permits/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Robert Pape]]: [[Escalation]] (again).''' [https://youtu.be/ALCFBWpQwrA] [[Douglas Macgregor]]: Disastrous [[NATO]] Summit - Renewed [[war]] on [[Iran]] &amp;amp; [[Russia]]. [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/douglas-macgregor-disastrous-nato][https://youtu.be/mcp-pYYs_T8] [[ATACMS]] in [[Kuwait]], logistical support for US aircraft carriers in [[Oman]] hit. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-attacks-jordan-kuwait-oman-and-qatar-with-drones-and-missiles-after-us-strikes/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Stephen Bryen]]: [[Ukraine]] wants to produce [[Patriot missile|Patriot interceptors]]''' but there are problems. [https://weapons.substack.com/p/ukraine-wants-to-produce-patriot] ''[[The War Zone]]'': Ukrainian-built [[Patriot missile]]s won't be defending the country's skies anytime soon. [https://www.twz.com/land/ukraine-built-patriot-missiles-wont-be-defending-the-countrys-skies-anytime-soon] ''[[Responsible Statecraft]]'': Ukraine wants to make its own Patriot missiles. That's a bad idea. [https://responsiblestatecraft.org/patriot-missile-system-ukraine/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukraine]] [[TCC|press gangs]]''' stir [[riot]]s in [[Lviv]]. [https://armedforces.press/the-ukraine-war/2026/07/10/ukraine-farce-lviv-draft-clash-prompts-criminal-probes-and-military-self-review-as-bounty-hunters-encite-rage-among-ukrainians/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Troy Jackson, Shenna Bellows, and Nirav Shah emerge as the most likely replacements for [[Maine]] [[Dem]] [[U.S. Senate|Senate]] nominee''', anti-war [[Graham Platner]], who was forced out by the pro-war [[Establishment]]. [https://prospect.org/2026/07/09/three-likely-replacements-for-graham-platner-maine-senate-democrats/] ''The anti-war candidate -- Nirav Shah -- is the least likely to be picked by Dem insiders''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''BREAKING: [[baseball]] [[sports gambling]] scandal in [[Philly]]''': &amp;quot;FanDuel Used [[Bryce Harper]] To Allegedly Prey On [[Gambling]] [[addiction|Addict]] Who Lost $1.5 Million On Bets.&amp;quot; [https://brobible.com/sports/article/fanduel-used-bryce-harper-prey-gambling-addict/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Daily Caller]]'': OK [[Boomer]]: [[Neocon]]s used landline''' phones to poll young [[MAGA]] [[voter]]s. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/07/09/neocons-landline-phones-poll-young-maga-voters-trump-america-first-gen-z/] ''No, [[GenZ]]ers do not support [[warmonger]]ing''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] [[Presbyterian Church]]''' votes to recognize [[Gaza]] genocide. [https://pres-outlook.org/2026/07/assembly-declares-israels-war-in-gaza-a-genocide/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[MP]] from [[NATO]] ally [[Finland]]''' blocked from entering NATO ally [[UK]] for quoting [[Bible]]. [https://slaynews.com/finnish-lawmaker-blocked-entering-uk-quoting-bible/] ''Shared values of [[the West]]?''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Liberal media]] and [[Establishment]] [[Dem]]s force the anti-war [[populist]] [[Platner]] to quit''', even though he won his primary by a landslide. [https://apnews.com/article/maine-senate-graham-platner-48d472ac4a043792032f3e3f5a33ef1b][https://youtu.be/HpoV8s0AJXI]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Brazil]]ian couple face prison sentence for [[homeschooling]]''' their children [https://nypost.com/2026/07/08/world-news/brazil-parents-face-prison-sentence-for-homeschooling-after-court-accuses-them-of-intellectual-neglect/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Oil]] up 5%, [[Dow]] drops 500''' pts after [[Trump]] declares MOU dead. [https://apnews.com/article/stocks-rates-oil-iran-ai-671d9c94b302f7db533f46baa18387d3][https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/07/war-on-iran-both-sides-declare-their-mou-to-be-ineffective.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UniParty]] coordinates with unelected''' [[dictator]] [[Zelensky]] at [[NATO]] Summit. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/07/08/uniparty-senators-and-mike-turner-take-trip-to-turkey-nato-summit-to-coordinate-with-zelenskyy/?lctg=66158495]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Young men are losing millions of dollars daily on [[World Cup]] [[gambling]]''', as the volume wagered on [[Kalshi]] is exceeding a billion dollars per day. [https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/world-cup-drives-prediction-market-134200137.html] ''The man who betrayed [[Bible]] translator [[William Tyndale]] had lost his inheritance to gambling''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] reneges sanctions relief'''. [https://justthenews.com/world/middle-east/united-states-revokes-license-authorizing-sale-iranian-oil] [[Iran war]] resumes. [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/resumption-of-war-on-iran] Trump strikes [[Kharg Island]]. [https://youtu.be/uNigYi8VT7E] [[Prof Pape]]: Situation Report. [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/situation-report-special-edition-3e1] [[US]] hits 80 targets in [[Iran]], Iran retaliates and hits 85 US military assets. [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/update-american-military-assets-under]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukraine]] stored [[depleted uranium]]''' in populated areas. [https://youtu.be/DZnuTtx52kQ]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Liberal media]] is getting every high-profile [[Dem]] to abandon [[Platner]]''', and even his initial supporter [[Stephen King]] now says &amp;quot;he wasn't 'defending [[Platner]].'&amp;quot; [https://www.wmtw.com/article/maine-author-stephen-king-defends-graham-platner-amid-assault-allegations/71847957]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Bernie Sanders]] caves into the [[Establishment]] by urging [[Platner]] to drop out''', demonstrating the futility of the [[progressives]] as they bow to the [[liberal media]]. [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jul/07/graham-platner-democrats-senate-maine-trump-nato-us-politics-latest-news-updates]                                                                                                             &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Liberal]]s try to force anti-war [[Platner]] to withdraw by the July 13th deadline''' despite his winning the [[Dem]] primary by a landslide, and publicize an accusation of [[sexual assault]] which he categorically denies. [https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/07/06/ex-girlfriend-accuses-graham-platner-of-sexual-assault/] '''Update:''' Platner suspends campaign. [https://unherd.com/newsroom/new-platner-allegations-are-a-test-of-democrats-moral-limits/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[WSJ]]'': 'There is no going back': The inside story''' of [[Europe]]'s rupture w/ [[America]]. [https://archive.is/1Rp9v#selection-2142.0-2157.75]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Exit [[Mitch McConnell]]''', enter Abdul El-Sayed. [https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/exit-mitch-mcconnell-enter-abdul] ''[[Elaine Chao|McConnell's wife]] leaves country; [[Democrat]]s leave old school [[politics]].''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Federal Reserve]] says [[Biden border crisis]]''' made housing rise 30%. [https://justthenews.com/government/security/fed-reserve-working-paper-suggests-biden-illegal-immigrant-wave-drove-home] ''[[Democrat]]s call it [[Stimulus]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Phenomenal [[Kylian Mbappe]] has wit along with his [[Christian]] [[faith]]''', in his response to the &amp;quot;ugly football&amp;quot; by [[Paraguay]] whom he defeated with a penalty kick: &amp;quot;We can also get our hands dirty, we know how to do it. ... Guess they were thinking we were going to show up in tuxedos, but we were ready.&amp;quot; [https://www.espn.com/soccer/story/_/id/49272367/france-kylian-mbappe-paraguay-tactics-get-our-hands-dirty]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Out-of-touch [[United States Independence Day|Independence Day]] political campaigning''': poll shows that 61% of [[Gen Z]] -- the swing vote in 4 months -- do not even know what this 250th anniversary is celebrating. [https://thehill.com/polls/5953222-july-4th-ignorance-among-americans/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[NYT]]'' lies''' about [[Russian]] and [[Ukrainian]] casualties. [https://sonar21.com/the-ny-times-lies-about-russian-and-ukrainian-casualties/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Data center]] halted in [[Wyoming]]''' for spreading a rare metal-resistant bacterium into [[Cheyenne (city)|Cheyenne]]'s reclamation water supply. [https://share.google/Ga0IPjtsuHSZhs9vu] Constant noise from a [[Wisconsin]] [[Microsoft]] [[data center]] was initially mistaken as coming from a freight train engine! [https://www.jsonline.com/story/money/business/2026/07/02/microsoft-sued-by-wisconsin-residents-for-noise-from-data-center/90786863007/] ''MSFT has approval for 14 more there''. 8,000 polluting diesel generators in mostly residential [[Virginia]] are poised to turn on for [[data center]]s, as summer heat strains the grid. [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/01/data-center-boom-collides-with-record-heat-testing-power-grid-00983009]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''A [[secular]], non-religious [[Form of Solemnization of Matrimony|wedding ceremony]] for [[Taylor Swift]]''' at [[Madison Square Garden]]. ''Where's the meaning without any [[religion]]?''                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;The old [[politics]] are gone&amp;quot;''': [[conservative]] [[Steve Bannon]] bluntly explains the [[socialist]] takeover, and how the [[Establishment]] is clueless. &amp;quot;If you just sit there and demonize, that’s certainly not enough.&amp;quot; [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/07/02/the-old-politics-are-gone-steve-bannon-on-the-democratic-socialist-wave-00985060 ''Politico'']&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Times of Israel]]'': Thousands gather at Hostages Square''' in [[Tel Aviv]] to demand a state commission of inquiry into the failures surrounding the onslaught and massacre. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/we-wont-give-up-crowd-marking-1000-days-since-oct-7-vows-to-keep-demanding-state-inquiry/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''June &amp;quot;was the slowest month of hiring since February&amp;quot;''', as wage growth and hiring sputter. [https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/june-jobs-report-stable-hiring-rcna352603] 9 days of [[sour crude]] remain to make [[diesel]] in the [[Strategic Petroleum Reserve]]. [https://sonar21.com/only-9-days-of-sour-crude-left-in-the-us-spr/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Another [[socialist]] -- an opponent of giving military arms to [[Israel]] -- defeats a 15-term [[Dem]] congressional incumbent''', this time in [[Denver]]. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5945886-diana-degette-loses-relelection-bid/] ''The [[Dem]] [[Establishment]] is collapsing, while disapproval of [[Republican]] incumbents is high too''. [[Klippenstein]]: Dinosaur [[Democrat]]s meet asteroid. [https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/dinosaur-democrats-meet-asteroid]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Pulte]] cleans house at [[ODNI]].''' [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/07/03/report-acting-dni-bill-pulte-fires-dozens-of-odni-staff-for-politicizing-intelligence-insubordination-gross-misconduct/][https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/23/acting-dni-pulte-removes-51-from-agency-six-fired-and-45-sent-back-to-their-home-agencies/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''5-4 [[SCOTUS]] declares [[birthright citizenship]] a constitutional right''', turning the future of the [[U.S.]] over to the voting power of [[illegal aliens]]' children. ''[[John Roberts|Roberts]], [[Amy Coney Barrett|Barrett]], [[Brett Kavanaugh|Kavanaugh]] vote with [[liberal]]s.'' [https://technofog.substack.com/p/supreme-court-upholds-birthright]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Czech]] [[Political party|party]] seeks to strip [[Zelensky]] of nation's top honor''' after the [[Ukrainian]] [[dictator]] named a [[military]] unit after a [[Volhynia Massacre|Nazi collaborator]]. [https://www.politico.eu/article/russia-suspends-railway-border-crossings-finland-baltic-neighbors/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Nuclear]] [[weapon]]s ban''' lifted in [[Finland]]; [https://www.politico.eu/article/finland-lifts-nuclear-weapons-ban-nato-security-shift/] [[Russia]] seals border with [[Finland]] &amp;amp; [[Baltic States]]. [https://kyivindependent.com/russia-to-halt-multiple-railway-checkpoints-on-borders-with-finland-estonia-latvia/] ''[[Black Sea]] becomes warzone.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Buckingham Palace]] drops 500-year 'Defender of the Faith' '''from [[Charles III|King Charles]] job title. [https://www.rt.com/news/642356-king-charles-loses-defender-of-faith/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;[[Texas]] education board votes to make [[Bible]] passages required reading&amp;quot;''' [https://abcnews.com/GMA/News/texas-education-board-votes-make-bible-passages-required/story?id=134246001] but omits the most beneficial, life-changing passages to appease [[liberal]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Double standard]] for women who have [[abortion]]s is ending''': Dozens of women leaders and others endorse criminal penalties for mothers who abort. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/riley-gaines-abby-johnson-60-others-back-criminal-penalties-for-women-who-get-abortions/?utm_source=latest_news]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Pride month]] proclamation defeated in [[Maine]]''', for the first time by York County commissioners. [https://www.newscentermaine.com/article/news/local/lgbtq/york-county-rejects-pride-proclamation-maine-lgbtq/97-0e663938-ee1c-435b-96f7-648e11b8f2cd]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''3 million drop [[ObamaCare]]''' in just one year. [https://apnews.com/article/affordable-care-act-obamacare-health-subsidies-premiums-3dc9a0cd249a7622ce31e8559bfff729]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Zelensky]] and [[NATO]]''' promise 40-day '[[campaign of terrors]]' prior to [[Russian]] [[election]]s. [https://sonar21.com/ukraines-desperate-propaganda-campaign-while-russia-advances-along-the-entire-front/] ''[[Ukraine]] cancelled all [[democratic]] elections more than 2 years ago.'' [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-calls-ukraines-zelenskyy-dictator-without-elections-rift-widens] 237 injured, 42 killed in [[NATO]] attacks. [https://tass.com/politics/2153327][https://tass.com/politics/2153349] [[Russian]] [[parliament]] threatens NATO factories arming [[Ukraine]]. [https://unn.ua/en/news/in-the-russian-state-duma-they-threatened-strikes-on-factories-in-europe-that-produce-weapons-for-ukraine]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''With [[provocation]]s, [[drone]] attacks, and''' [[Britain]] and [[France]] seizing tankers, [[Russia]] arms oil tankers. [https://x.com/Globalsurv/status/2071561575173931440]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Transition Protocol: [[Saudi]]s tell [[US]]''' to get out; [https://youtu.be/0Yh3PCllz-0] [[Israel]] plans attack on [[Ayatollah]]'s funeral. [https://youtu.be/hqM7lHJUaTw]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Persian Gulf]] [[ceasefire]] violated.''' [https://youtu.be/kxKS2RwD5FI]. [[Trump]] strikes 'obliterated' [[Iranian]] [[military]] sites again.  [https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2071029590932258941] [[WION]]: [[Trump]]'s [[Iran war]] casualties: Major damage to [[US Navy|US Naval]] base. [https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0r67G5t0Cn0?feature=share][https://www.wionews.com/videos/trump-s-iran-war-secrets-major-damage-to-us-naval-base-1782500227892] [https://youtu.be/5wmZT-WnT9c TOI] ''[[WaPo]]'': [[Israel]] '[[sabotaging]]' [[US]] attempts at 'lasting [[peace]]' with [[Iran]]. [https://thealtworld.com/anthony_cartalucci/washington-post-claims-israel-sabotaging-us-attempts-at-lasting-peace-with-iran]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[BBC]]: 8 [[Antifa]] [[extremist]]s''' get combined 450 years in anti-[[ICE]] '[[peace]]ful protest'. [https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/eight-people-alleged-ties-antifa-000019819.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Senate]] [[Dem]] wants new Dem leadership''':  &amp;quot;The old models are no longer working, and that includes the [[Democratic Party]],” Sen. [[Elissa Slotkin]] (D-Mich.) declared. [https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5941463-slotkin-democrat-leadership-change/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Washington, D.C.|D.C.]] [[Dem]]s &amp;quot;are freaking out''' about [[progressive]]s’ winning streak.&amp;quot; [[Establishment]] Dems &amp;quot;fear they’re on the verge of losing the party’s ideological civil war,&amp;quot; ''Politico'' [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/25/progressive-moderate-democratic-party-battlegrounds-00975000 reports][https://jimtreacher.substack.com/p/dems-panic-about-commie-infiltrators]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dr Brovkin]]: [[Russia]] warns [[NATO]]''' - [[Zelensky]] has crossed the point of no return. [https://youtu.be/Cq6z32cc5Wo]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Korybko]]: Is [[Trump 2.0]]'s '[[escalation]]' [[strategy]]''' against [[Russia]] starting to take shape? [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-20s-escalation-strategy-against-russia-starting-take-shape] [[Mearsheimer]]:  Russia has red lines &amp;amp; [[nuclear weapon]]s. [https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/russia-has-red-lines-and-nuclear] [[Lavrov]] vs [[Rubio]]: Who's telling the [[truth]] about the '[[Spirit of Anchorage]]'? [https://korybko.substack.com/p/lavrov-vs-rubio-whos-telling-the][https://youtu.be/eDg4YHtlJ3g]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] member [[Netherlands]] [[euthanize]]s 12 year old.''' [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/netherlands-just-euthanized-a-12]'' [[Western civilization|Western]] [[values]]?''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Alastair Crooke]]: [[Russia]] re-introducing fear''' on the world's stage. [https://youtu.be/P2N9xpZFCCs] [[Peskov]]: [[Nuclear]] [[deterrence theory|deterrence]] only force preventing global war. [https://www.newsy-today.com/russia-nuclear-weapons-are-the-only-deterrent-to-global-war/][https://youtu.be/Ew9XMVsMKXg]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Global [[food]] [[crisis]] update: [[Russian]] [[farm]]s shutting down''' because they can't get [[diesel]] as a result of [[NATO]]/[[Ukraine]] attacks on refineries. [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/global-food-crisis-russias-farmers] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] and [[Oman]] sign framework''' for [[Hormuz Strait]] governance. [https://www.roic.ai/news/iran-and-oman-forge-joint-framework-for-strait-of-hormuz-governance-06-12-2026]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump%27s_inept_advisers#John_Bolton|Trump inept advisor John Bolton]]''' who advocated [[war]] with [[Iran]] in 2019 pleads guilty to mishandling classified information. [https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/210438/john-bolton-donald-trump-guilty-plea]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Zerohedge]]'': Small plane hits [[Beijing]]'s tallest tower;''' was someone sending [[China]] a message? [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/small-plane-hits-beijings-tallest-tower-was-someone-sending-china-message]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Starmer]] to give enriched [[uranium]]''' to [[Ukraine]]. [https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/uk-to-guarantee-enriched-uranium-supplies-to-ukraine] [[Putin]]: [[NATO]] is openly planning [[war]]. [https://youtu.be/ho8Ti1QA37o][https://youtu.be/fUzLJJrt3Hc][https://thealtworld.com/andrew_korybko/whats-the-likelihood-of-a-nato-russian-clash-around-2030] [[Tootie Fruiti O'Rutte]] at the [[White House]]. [https://youtu.be/Pg_5_IrwObw][https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/24/nato-general-secretary-mark-rutte-gives-remain-in-nato-pitch-to-president-trump-in-white-house/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Left-wing]] [[populist]]s''' smashed [[incumbent]]s in Tuesday [[primaries]]. But can they govern? [https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/how-do-you-beat-an-oligarchy-one] Official [[DSA]] platform calls for abolishing the [[Senate]], the [[Presidency]], the [[Supreme Court]],&lt;br /&gt;
and more. [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/official-platform-democratic-socialists-america-dsa-includes-abolishing/] [[Van Jones]]: [[Mamdani]] is not alone. [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2026/06/23/van-jones-left-is-on-the-march-democratic-socialists-are-an-insurgency-this-is-a-serious-movement/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Democratic party]] [[establishment]]''' facing reckoning after [[far-left]]ists win power. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/24/democratic-party-establishment-zohran-mamdani-dsa-new-york-candidates-victories-win-hakeem-jeffries-israel/] [[Trump]] [[hate]]r [[Dan Goldman]] defeated, 65% - 35%. [https://www.bitchute.com/video/3RI7dwdMhq01] [[Hakeem Jeffries|Sorry, Hakeem,]] but the [[revolution]] always eats its own. [https://stateoftheday.us/p/sorry-hakeem-but-the-revolution-always] '' 'You’re next!' the [[socialist]]s yell.'' [https://youtu.be/FbI6a4D88po] ''[[Conservative Treehouse]]'': ‘[[Occupy Wall Street]]’ now officially controls the [[Democrat party]]. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/24/occupy-wall-street-now-officially-controls-the-democrat-party/]&lt;br /&gt;
---- &lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for monstrous [[data centers]]''': banned by 3 counties on Tuesday in [[Florida]]! [https://wiod.iheart.com/featured/florida-news/content/2026-06-24-3-florida-counties-ban-ai-data-centers-in-one-day/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Responsible Statecraft]]: [[Trump]] ended his [[idiot]]ic [[Iran war]].''' Good. [https://responsiblestatecraft.org/trump-ends-war-critics/] [[Finian Cunningham ]]: [[Trump]]’s [[Iran war]] debacle is ominous for [[Russia]]. [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/trumps-iran-war-debacle-is-ominous-for-russia]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': [[MLB]] players are '''''not''''' required to wear [[Pride month]] logos, and teams are suppose to tell them that. The [[San Francisco]] Giants failed to tell them, the MLB admits. [https://www.mlb.com/news/commissioner-rob-manfred-responds-to-letter-from-senator-josh-hawley] [[LGBTQ+]] community begs [[Liberal corporate tyranny|woke corporation]]s to stop 'helping' before they ruin baseball forever. [https://www.dailyskrape.com/lgbtq-community-begs-woke-corporations-to-stop-helping-before-they-ruin-baseball-forever/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[JD Vance]] infuriates [[neocon]]s.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/j-d-vance-infuriates-the-neocons/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Starmer]] out -''' World breathes sigh of relief. [https://patricklancasternewstoday.substack.com/p/breaking-keir-starmer-resigns-what] ''With 5 million [[children]] hungry,'' [https://labourlist.org/2026/02/tackling-poverty-legacy-keir-starmer/][https://archive.is/I8kCX] ''Starmer sends another $1 Billion to [[corrupt]] [[Zelensky regime]].'' [https://www.kyivpost.com/post/78478] [[UK]] [[Storm Shadow]] hits Voronezh. [https://www.military-stuff.org/total-war-storm-shadow-hits-voronezh-lyman-konstantinovka-fall-military-summary-2026-06-22/] Update: [[Farage]] demands snap election. [https://humanevents.com/2026/06/22/nigel-farage-demands-snap-election-after-keir-starmer-resigns]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukraine]] tries to drone [[Scott Ritter]]''' in [[Russia]]. [https://youtu.be/SVQl6Uzg8J8]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] [[Treasury Secretary Bessent]] on [[Zelensky]]:''' 'the little f--- acts like Mr. Bean on [[crack]].' [https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jun/20/scott-bessent-volodymyr-zelenskyy-trump][https://youtu.be/cD3iGmNii9E]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Seymour Hersh]]: [[Trump]] break with [[Bibi]].''' [https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/trump-breaks-with-bibi]] ''[[Times of Israel]]'': [[Trump]] calls [[Netanyahu]] a 'conman'. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-told-carlson-musk-in-early-2025-that-he-wouldnt-attack-iran-report/] ''[[WSJ]]'': 'Trump makes the [[Jew]]ish [[state]] the [[scapegoat]]'. [https://www.wsj.com/opinion/iran-and-trump-blame-israel-first-a122a0d7] [[Macgregor]]: 'I fear for Trump's safety.' [https://youtu.be/B8Ej6IOjDPc][https://youtu.be/uTd1yNfie_8]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Araghchi]]: Talks delivered 'major progress' '''to end Lebanon war. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/vance-switzerland-high-stakes-iran-talks-get-underway-what-we-know-so-far]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Major rupture between [[US]]-[[Israel]]''' as [[Trump]] grows exasperated w/ [[Netanyahu]]'s bloodletting. [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/major-rupture-between-us-israel-as] ''Trump reveals oil reserves about to run out, 'bedlam' would ensue.'' [[Strategic oil reserve]] nears collapse… [[US]] must choose: [[guns or butter]]. [https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/strategic-oil-reserve-nears-collapse] ''US has roughly a 12-day supply left.  [[Trump]] must decide to give the [[military]] jet fuel or the trucking industry [[diesel]]. This is the main reason Trump signed the MoU with [[Iran]].'' &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[German]] opposition demands [[reparations]] from [[Ukraine]]''' for [[Nordstream pipeline]] [[terrorist]] attack. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/the-afd-co-leaders-demand-for-ukrainian] ''[[Liberal]] [[globalist]]s hell bent on [[strategic defeat]] of [[Russia]] through [[NATO]] [[proxy war]].''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[DNI Tulsi Gabbard]] releases evidence''' [[Anthony Fauci]] manipulated intelligence and [[lied]] to [[Congress]]. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/19/dni-tulsi-gabbard-releases-evidence-anthony-fauci-manipulated-intelligence-and-lied-to-congress/] ''It's time you know the [[truth]].'' [https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/2067792184753938484] Fauci subpoenaed.[https://justthenews.com/government/congress/rand-paul-subpoenas-fauci-testimony-covid-origin-probe]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''5 years post-[[covid]], [[Public school|public middle schoolers]]''' still can’t read or do math. [https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/22/5-years-post-covid-public-middle-schoolers-still-cant-read-or-do-math/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''A [[data center]] generates noise as loud as a refrigerator''', an outraged town is told by their mayor. [https://www.nj.com/business/2026/06/a-tiny-nj-borough-approved-a-18b-ai-data-center-now-its-residents-are-fighting-back.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Another [[socialist]] wins to become a big city ([[Washington, D.C.|D.C.]]) [[mayor]]''' [https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/18/lewis-george-dc-mayor-primary-00966879] while [[GOP]] leaders are perceived to pander to [[oligarchs]] and foreign interests.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Mearsheimer]] &amp;amp; [[Parsi]]: Will the deal hold?''' [https://youtu.be/okSltilmp-o]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Vice President Vance]]: '[[Israel]] needs to wake up''' and smell the [[reality]].' [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/watch-mic-drop-press-briefing-vance-goes-israeli/] ''[[WaPo]]'': [[CIA]] warns [[Israel]] will do everything to undermine [[Trump]] [[peace]]. [https://archive.is/gP2xE] [[Regime change]]? [https://youtu.be/_2IiQLb1uTY] Report: [[Trump 2.0|Trump admin]] working to oust [[Netanyahu]]. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/report-us-officials-working-to-establish-informal-channels-with-israels-opposition/][https://youtu.be/5MWvoRgKRfk] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] Rape Gang Inquiry Report: [[Starmer]] let 13,000''' suspected rapists off as UK girls were systemically victims of [[grooming gang]]s over 30 years. [https://humanevents.com/2026/06/17/revealed-starmer-let-13000-suspected-rapists-off-as-british-girls-were-systemically-raped-by-pakistani-rape-gangs-over-30-years-rape-gang-inquiry-report][https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/06/17/rape-gangs-new-report-exposes-how-woke-ideology-enabled-one-most-horrific-scandals-british-history/][https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf] ''250,000 victims.'' [[Musk]] supports [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal|Nuremberg-style trials]] after Inquiry release. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/musk-supports-nuremberg-style-trials-after-uk-rape-gang-inquiry-release] ''[[AP]]'': Starmer on the precipace of resignation. [https://apnews.com/article/britain-keir-starmer-future-burnham-labour-cc4567e307b4b3e6fbcb75c2c66a503c]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[BBC]]: [[Poland]] strips [[Zelensky]] of nations' highest honor''' after the [[Ukrainian]] [[dictator]] names [[military]] unit after [[Nazi]] who murdered [[Poles]]. [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr7xzg3dmj8o] [[Ukraine]] expected to pivot closer to [[Germany]] amidst its anti-[[Polish]] stance. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/ukraine-is-expected-to-pivot-closer] [[Russia]], [[Belarus]] on Germany's attempt to rewrite [[WWII]] history. [https://youtu.be/ag55YoEDLJA]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]]: No approval of [[FISA 702]]''' until [[Save America Act]] passed. [https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116764370070279119]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Max Blumenthal]]: [[Israel]] in panic.''' [https://youtu.be/gqGpIngzUis]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Judge Andrew Napolitano]]: A [[Republic]] or an [[Empire]]?''' [https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/19/a-republic-or-an-empire/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Alastair Crooke]]: A new [[Middle East]] is born''' &amp;amp; [[NATO]] attacks [[Moscow]]. [https://youtu.be/GkiCgI8QwiM] ''[[The Hill]]'': Pressure on [[Putin]] to strike back hard. [https://youtu.be/sSehsS9hPPM] '''Update:''' [[Zelensky]] gives [[Belarus]] 7-day ultimatum. [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/zelensky-gives-belarus-7-day-ultimatum] ''[[Drone]] attack on Moscow stuffed with [[kerosene]] mixtures to give [[Hollywood]] affect.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Belfast]] in flames.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/after-a-shocking-crime-in-belfast-ireland-wakes-up/][https://youtu.be/0iynCosZ0UE] ''[[Catholics]] &amp;amp; [[Protestant]]s unite to send [[immigrant]]s home.'' [https://youtu.be/E5Yn65VS0Rg] [[UK]] Minister for [[Northern Ireland]] says 'crackdown coming' against those who complain about beheading. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/12/britains-prime-minister-for-northern-ireland-says-a-crackdown-is-coming-against-those-who-complain-about-beheading/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] provocation: [[Starmer]] seizes tanker''' carrying [[Russian oil]] in [[English Channel]].  [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/14/facing-domestic-military-embarrassment-british-pm-starmer-orders-capture-of-russian-shadow-fleet-tanker/] ''Meanwhile, Starmer refuses to stop [[illegal immigrants]] from entering UK by boat.'' [https://youtu.be/Elp8kHtlQgc] ''[[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]]'': [[Russia]] ships [[oil]] at near record pace. [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-16/russia-s-oil-exports-near-record-pace-as-ukraine-s-drones-target-its-refineries]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] military intelligence''' deliberately provoked [[Catholic]]-[[Protestant]] [[violence]] in the 1980s. [https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/leaked-emails-reveal-british-intel]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[FTC]] charges [[Ukraine]] [[Big Tech|Tech]] giant''' with [[fraud|defrauding]] customers of billions. [https://kyivindependent.com/us-trade-regulator-accuses-billion-dollar-ukrainian-it-giant-of-fraud/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''$300 billion &amp;quot;reconstruction fund&amp;quot; is a big burden''' [https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5931551-vice-president-vance-switzerland-trip/] to put on [[taxpayer]]s who never supported this war. Much comes from tolls.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'''[[Pennsylvania]]ns Lose Record [[Gambling]] Sum''' In Single Month&amp;quot;: $626 million lost in May. [https://gamblingharm.org/pa-gambling-revenue-may-2026-record/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Worst summer job market for teenagers ever recorded''', due to &amp;quot;[[inflation]], [[oil]] prices and cautious hiring,&amp;quot;  reports [[AP]]. [https://apnews.com/article/teens-summer-jobs-unemployment-economy-5415ea134061119e6450b9de15300ba2]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Minimum wage laws drive teen unemployment''', reports ''[[Fortune magazine]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Teen summer jobs are at an 80-year low. Employers are hiring fewer young people, citing an experience gap and rising minimum wages that make inexperienced youth less attractive.&amp;quot; [https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryancraig/2026/06/19/why-summer-jobs-for-teens-are-vanishing-and-why-it-matters/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Underrated Sports Stars|Underrated Sports Star]] [[Kylian Mbappe]]''' -- &amp;quot;Everything that has happened to me has been a gift from [[God]]&amp;quot; -- will become the all-time [[World Cup]] top career scorer, and netted 2 for [[France]] in its opener. [https://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/article/who-has-most-goals-in-world-cup-history-heres-where-lionel-messi-kylian-mbappe-rank-all-time-after-opening-games-161623449.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'''[[MLB]] warns Giants players who wrote [[Bible]] verses''' on caps during ‘[[Pride Month|Pride Night]].’&amp;quot;[https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/mlb-warns-giants-players-who-wrote-bible-verses-caps-during-pride-night] ''They wrote [[Genesis, Chapter 9|Genesis 9:12-16]] - the real [[rainbow]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] ends [[blockade]],''' [[oil]] moving. [https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/hormuz-normalization-begins-saudi-supertankers-exit-and-flood-persian-gulf-oil-heads-asia][https://dpyne.substack.com/p/trump-accepts-all-irans-peace-demands] [[Tucker]] &amp;amp; [[Piers Morgan]]: [[Trump]] puts [[Bibi]] in his place as [[neocon]]s cry over [[peace]]. [https://youtu.be/kpKQKOHzPLU]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukrainian]] [[drone]] attack on bus carrying [[Belarus]]sian [[children]]''''s [[soccer]] team kills one, injures 4 children. [https://youtu.be/DnlfsiArCD4][https://humanevents.com/2026/06/17/woman-killed-children-injured-after-ukrainian-drone-strikes-bus-carrying-belarus-youth-soccer-team-in-russia]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[NYT]]'': [[Germany]] and [[Japan]] rearming''' 80 years after [[World War II]]. [https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/14/world/europe/germany-japan-rearmament-military.html] ''[[United_Nations#UN_Charter_Chapter_VII|UN Charter Cht VII]] gives the right of any major [[Allies of WWII|Ally of WWII]] to use force against former [[Axis Powers]] without [[Security Council]] approval.'' &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Berlin]] [[police]] beat [[Poles]]''' carrying cross to monument of [[Polish]] victims of [[WWII]]. [https://x.com/PiotrCieplucha/status/2066910971830956514] ''[[RT]]'': [[Germany]] misses [[Nazism]] – [[Lavrov]]. [https://www.rt.com/russia/641625-germany-misses-nazism-lavrov/] ''[[Berlin]]'s growing [[military]] partnership with [[Kiev]] shows its [[Nazi]] instincts never truly disappeared, the [[Russia]]n foreign minister said.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Kyiv]] [[police]] [[tear gas]] anti-[[draft]] protesters.''' [https://www.hindustantimes.com/videos/world-news/massive-riot-takes-control-of-kyivs-streets-over-zelenskys-forced-mobilisation-for-army-101781524849102.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dr Robert Malone]]: The [[neo-Nazi]] lovers''' of the Hate-Industrial Complex. [https://www.malone.news/p/the-neo-nazi-lovers-of-the-hate-industrial] ''[[SPLC]]: Can it get any weirder?''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Good news for the [[unborn]]''': [[Texas]] [[GOP]] votes to criminalize a mother's [[abortion]] of her child, as in taking the [[abortion pill]]. [https://www.statesman.com/news/politics/article/texas-gop-platform-2026-convention-22289377.php]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] used [[psychologist]]s''' to craft messages to [[Trump]]. [https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/iran-trump-psychologists-ceasefire-negotiations]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Netanyahu]] rejects [[Iran]] [[peace]] plan.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/iran-war-day-107-israel-bombs-beirut-imperiling-u-s-iran-peace-deal/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] rejects [[Trump]]'s request''' not to strike [[Israel]] in exchange for [[money]], saying its allies are not for sale. [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/is-this-why-trump-thinks-iranians] ''[[Zerohedge]]'': [[Pentagon]] officially elevates Israel's intelligence threat level to highest category. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/angry-pentagon-sources-leak-report-israels-unhinged-spying-us-officials][https://youtu.be/HZ_mu-r65og]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[France]]'s new 30-year-old [[conservative]] superstar''' Jordan Bardella is ahead to become its president next year, and he waves off any support by [[Trump]]. [https://www.politico.eu/article/frances-far-right-frontrunner-jordan-bardella-rejects-us-donald-trumps-backing/][https://youtu.be/YAhxwt7i5Mk]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Entire [[U.S.]] men's [[World Cup]] team thanked [[God]]''' on the field after their 4-1 victory over [[Paraguay]]: [https://www.instagram.com/p/DZh5y_Gh7xk/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''A grandfather with a shovel''' saves a young man from [[Zelensky]]'s [[TCC|conscription officers]]. [https://t.me/two_majors/77389] ''Another win for the tactical shovel.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Tulsi Gabbard]] exposes [[cover-up]] by [[Deep State]]''': 'new evidence of past [[U.S. funded biological labs abroad|US government funding for more than 120 biolabs]] in over 30 countries,' she reveals. [https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/2065440568423944607][https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/gabbard-releases-intelligence-showing-federal-government-has-funded-120][https://www.malone.news/p/dni-gabbard-reveals-evidence-of-us] [[Andrew Korybko]]: [[Laura Loomer]] &amp;amp; [[MAGA]] like her are wrong: 'MAGA Dissidents' aren’t a 'Russian influence op'. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/laura-loomer-and-maga-like-her-are]&lt;br /&gt;
---- ''&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Glenn Diesen]] interviews [[Mearsheimer]] &amp;amp; [[Karaganov]]: [[Nuclear war|Nuclear strike]]''' on [[Europe]] to restore [[Deterrence theory|deterrence]]. [https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/what-nuclear-taboo] [[Korybko]]: [[Putin]] rebuffs hawks who want to attack [[NATO]]. [https://thealtworld.com/andrew_korybko/putin-powerfully-rebuffed-the-hawks-who-want-him-to-attack-nato]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[The Intercept]]'': Top [[Pentagon]] official admits''' boat strike may have killed victims of [[human trafficking]]. [https://theintercept.com/2026/06/10/trump-boat-strikes-human-trafficking-victims/] ''No one would smuggle [[cocaine]] with 11 people on board their drug-running boat.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] top commander: '[[Russia]] not looking for conflict'.''' [https://www.ft.com/content/751d4555-9e8c-42a0-a37b-80893727776c] [[Ukrainian]]s beat [[TCC|Zelensky goons]] with axes and shovels. [https://t.me/rezident_ua/29662]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[U.S.]] men's [[World Cup]] team is outspokenly [[Christian]]''': &amp;quot;It's [[Bible]] time.&amp;quot; [https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jun/07/usmnt-religion-christian-pulisic-world-cup-2026]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': [[priest]] in [[Spain]] denies [[communion]] to a [[homosexual]] man in a [[same-sex marriage]], and doesn't waver amid [[liberal]] protests. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/faithful-priest-targeted-by-protesters-after-denying-married-homosexual-holy-communion/?utm_source=popular] '''Update:''' First [[Gay pride]] parade in [[Israel]] in 2 years. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/thousands-gather-as-lgbtq-pride-parade-kicks-off-in-tel-aviv-for-first-time-in-two-years/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] hits [[India]]n oil tanker''', [https://youtu.be/PsdFwjKE6hk] 3 Indian sailors killed; [https://x.com/sarbanandsonwal/status/2064965653749268514] [[India]] deploys [[nuke]]s for first time in history. [https://youtu.be/7sRN6hnzRxw] India signals rethink over [[West Asia]]. [https://www.indianpunchline.com/india-signals-rethink-over-west-asia/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] [[escalate]]s [[war]]''', [https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2064824143640502670] water treatment plant hit. [https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/iran-says-us-military-deliberately-struck-vital-civilian-water-infrastructure-in-south/3963183]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
''''The Art of The No Deal':''' [https://x.com/barnes_law/status/2059668005252952355] [[Trump]] cancels [[aggression]] against [[Iran]]. [https://www.nbcnews.com/world/iran/live-blog/live-updates-us-strikes-iran-trump-hormuz-closed-rcna349554]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] ally [[Erdoğan]]: [[Israel]]i actions''' in [[Syria]] and [[Lebanon]] threaten [[Turkiye]]. [https://greekcitytimes.com/2026/06/10/erdogan-greater-israel-threat-turkey-syria-lebanon-2026/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Mario Nawfal]] interviews [[Tucker Carlson]].''' [https://youtu.be/seaUXVin4Gw]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[DNI]] revokes [[Biden]]-era''' flawed and [[fraud]]ulent intelligence assessments. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/12/dni-tulsi-gabbard-aaron-lukas-revokes-biden-era-assessments-created-inside-weaponized-cia-analyst-system/] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Sports gambling]] pandemic splits [[Texas]] from the [[U.S.]]''', as a Texas court rules in favor of allowing the [[NCAA]]-banned Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby to play. On appeal, &amp;quot;all four judges are Texas Tech alums if you're wondering,&amp;quot; [[Associated Press|AP]] reports. [https://abcnews.com/Politics/wireStory/college-sports-suddenly-facing-major-question-hinges-gambling-133740336] ''&amp;quot;Don't mess with [[Texas]]&amp;quot;!!!!''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conservapedia proven right]], again: the [[liberal media]] and the [[Establishment]] lose in a landslide''' to [[Graham Platner]], 72%-28%, in the [[Maine]] [[Dem]] primary for [[U.S. Senate]]. [https://www.cnn.com/election/2026/primaries/maine?admin1=23&amp;amp;election-data-id=2026-SD&amp;amp;election-painting-mode=single-party-candidates&amp;amp;filter-key-races=false&amp;amp;filter-flipped=false&amp;amp;filter-remaining=false] ''[[Republican]]s face similar losses in the [[2026 midterm elections]], if they don't pivot soon''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Fun to read about''': the genuine, intelligent [[populist]] [[Progressive]], [[Graham Platner]], sharply rebukes the idiotic one, [[John Fetterman]]. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5915534-maine-senate-race-platner-fetterman/?tbref=hp]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[The American Conservative]]'': Is the [[Iran war]]''' tipping [[Persian Gulf|the Gulf]] away from the [[US]]?&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Israel]] defies [[Trump]]''' and attacks [[Iran]]. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/iran-fm-blames-us-contradictions-stalled-peace-talks-tehran-slaps-million-dollar][https://www.timesofisrael.com/defying-trump-israel-strikes-iranian-military-fuel-targets-iran-houthis-fire-missiles-at-israel/][https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/iran-war-israel-again-bombs-lebanon-defying-trump-and-killing-deal-middle-east-straits-as-foundations-for-new-security-architecture-alon-mizrahis-zionism-delenda-est-debate-over-oil-cliff-t.html] [[News Forensics]]: The Donald &amp;amp; Bibi Show. [https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/the-donald-and-bibi-show] ''Not a comedy''. [[Houthi]]s ban Israeli shipping through the Bab el-Mandeb. [https://youtu.be/8M3QHjXk-04]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Pentagon]] accuses [[Israel]] of spying''' on the [[Trump 2.0|Trump administration]]. [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-raised-threat-israeli-spying-us-highest-level-sources-say-rcna348565]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conflicts Forum]]: '[[Israel]] is sliding''' towards [[anarchy]]'. [https://azradale.substack.com/p/israel-is-sliding-towards-anarchy]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Sen Mark Warner]] kept the [[Russia hoax]] alive''' for a decade. Now he’s blocking Pulte, the man who could expose him. [https://youtu.be/1_kVEbEZDf4]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] elite fail in their out-all smears of [[Graham Platner]]''', the anti-war [[progressive]] opportunist in [[Maine]] campaigning against the [[Establishment]]. [https://abcnews.com/Politics/maine-democrats-divided-platner-stick-reluctantly/story][https://jimtreacher.substack.com/p/i-believe-lyndsey-fifield][https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/gop-aipac-centrist-dems-for-keeps-schumer-platner-el-sayed.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] shot down [[Apache helicopter]].''' [https://youtu.be/MBIH6L9x0bg] ''First Apache helicopter lost in [[Iran war|Iran conflict]].''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conservative populist]] Zach Lahn won a stunning upset over the [[Trump]]-endorsed favorite''' for the [[GOP]] nomination for [[Iowa]] governor. Lahn opposed [[data center]]s, was endorsed by MAHA, and by [https://x.com/SteaknShake/status/2062149779446980912?s=20 Steak 'n Shake!] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] gives [[Azov Nazi]]s [[AI]]-guided [[drone]]s''' &amp;amp; why these are not game-changers. [https://rumble.com/v7at8zy-us-gives-ukrainian-nazis-ai-guided-drones-and-why-these-are-not-game-change.html] [[Putin]] responds to latest [[NATO]]/[[Zelensky]] [[psyop]]. [https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/putins-message-to-ukraine-keep-on][https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/russia-at-the-crossroads-as-elites]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] elite do not want the [[progressive]] [[populist]] [[Graham Platner]] in the [[U.S. Senate]]'''. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5912815-madeleine-dean-on-platner-allegations/?tbref=hp]  Platner forcing [[Dems]] to reckon with 'Vote Blue No Matter Who'. [https://theintercept.com/2026/05/28/graham-platner-jake-auchincloss-democrats-maine-senate/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Robert Pape]]: The New Phase.''' [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/the-new-phase]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Just the News]]'':  More than a dozen [[House]] [[Republican]]s''' help [[Democrat]]s pass [[Ukraine aid]] package. [https://justthenews.com/government/congress/more-dozen-house-republicans-help-democrats-pass-ukraine-aid-package]. Pigs at the [[democracy]] trough. [https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/pigs-at-the-democracy-trough]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] walks out of interview''' with ''[[Meet the Press]]'' [[fake news]] anchor [[Kristen Welker]]. [https://youtu.be/eCryZlXg7Uk]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Republican]] senators in the key [[2026 midterm elections|midterm election]] races''' -- [[Maine]], [[Ohio]], and [[Alaska]] -- vote against [[Trump]] in connection with his new [[White House]] ballroom. [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/breaking-six-republican-senators-vote-democrats-block-construction/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Best of the public]], again''': a mere &amp;quot;qualifier&amp;quot;, someone who had to win 3 rounds to qualify as an unseeded player for the French Open, has reached the women's finals to the cheers of [[Poland]]. [https://apnews.com/article/french-open-women-semifinals-roland-garros-483dbbf0e39d1d6ad94ee5eb55f122e0]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for [[perpetual war]]''': the [[House]], including [[conservative]] [[Republican]]s, vote for a 60-day window to end the war against [[Iran]]. [https://apnews.com/article/iran-war-powers-vote-house-9aaadea35f9523c818802286a6553536]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] attacks [[St. Petersburg]].''' [https://marksleboda.substack.com/p/nato-transitions-to-a-long-term-dirty] Do [[Palantir]]’s bosses have blood on their hands over the [[Starobelsk massacre]]? [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/do-palantirs-bosses-have-blood-on-their-hands-over-the-starobelsk-massacre]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] [[cover up]] of catastrophic [[nuclear]] threat''' to [[Europe]] gives the heinous game away. [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/nato-cover-up-of-catastrophic-nuclear-threat-to-europe-gives-the-heinous-game-away]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''The normalization of [[chaos]]:''' How conflicts in [[Ukraine]] and [[Iran]] advance in the dark. [https://global21.substack.com/p/the-normalization-of-chaos-how-conflicts] [[Trump]]’s [[Iran]] trap: a [[war]] he can’t win, a [[peace]] he won’t make. [https://www.aaronmate.net/p/trumps-iran-trap-a-war-he-cant-win] The world after [[America]]. [https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/04/the-world-after-america/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Daily Caller]]'': [[Nazi]]-tattooed [[Senate]] candidate''' accused of physically abusing ex-girlfriend. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/04/graham-platner-maine-senate-race-alleged-abuse-ex-girlfriend/] [[Graham Platner]]’s accusers came forward. ''[[NYT]]'' fed them to the wolves. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/04/new-york-times-graham-platner-lyndsey-fifield-catch-and-kill-domestic-abuse/] Talarico &amp;amp; [[Platner]] unvetted. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/05/31/faiz-shakir-quibbles-pat-mchenry-nazi-graham-platner-tattoos-abc-news-this-week/][https://freebeacon.substack.com/p/totenkopf-tattooed-platner-admired]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Gilbert Doctorow]]: [[Religion]] and national identity.''' [https://gilbertdoctorow.substack.com/p/religion-and-national-identity]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': significant decline in approval of [[same-sex marriage]] and relationships, reports [[Gallup]]. [https://apnews.com/article/gallup-poll-same-sex-marriage-morality-e12acb151446ac1b7970c0825bf1d072]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Increasingly positive view of the [[Bible]] in the [[U.S.]]''', shifting from 2016 to 2024: 36% -&amp;gt; 48% say it's true, 37% -&amp;gt; 43% say it's helpful today, and 47% -&amp;gt; 51% of [[American]]s have read more than half the [[Bible]]. [https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/americans-judge-the-good-book-more-positively-but-still-often-by-its-cover/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] carries out large-scale attack''' and [[Trump]] maintains tactical silence. [https://global21.substack.com/p/iran-carries-out-large-scale-attack]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Candid criticism by [[Paraguay]] tennis player of a female umpire's failure to control the crowd in a tense match''': he is then slapped by [[liberal]]s with a massive fine. [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/06/01/french-open-fines-paraguays-vallejo-for-saying-a-woman-shouldnt-have-umpired-his-match/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Political prisoner [[Tina Peters]] released from jail by [[Colorado]] [[liberals]]''': &amp;quot;I know that the [[Democrat]]s are going to cheat, and no one is really addressing the problem that I spent my time in prison as retribution for,” she said Monday. [https://apnews.com/article/colorado-election-clerk-peters-prison-release-b974d394595c75a6db831962551d094f]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] [[James Talarico]] leads [[Republican]] [[Ken Paxton]] by 47-44%''' [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5902035-texas-senate-race-poll/] in a race deciding which party controls the [[U.S. Senate]]. [https://christopherrufo.com/p/ken-paxton-vs-james-talarico] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Axios]]'': [[Trump]] tears into [[Netanyahu]]''' over [[Lebanon]] strikes. [https://www.axios.com/2026/06/01/trump-netanyahu-israel-lebanon-call]'' 'You'd be in prison if not for me...Everyone hates [[Israel]] because of this'.'' [https://youtu.be/CD_TPZ5KjPo][https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/trump-lashes-out-at-bibi] [[Iran]] suspends talks over [[US]]/[[Israel]] [[ceasefire]] breaches. [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/bombing-while-talking]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hundreds of thousands in [[atheistic]] [[London]] turn out to celebrate the &amp;quot;[[Bible]] Brothers&amp;quot;''' (Arsenal) [[soccer]] [[Premier League]] championship. [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq5px7jv92eo] ''The [[NFL]] cannot draw a crowd that large''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Just the News]]'': [[Democrat]] [[populist]] [[Graham Platner]]'''’s wife says she's ‘really angry’ his extramarital sexting was publicly disclosed. [https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/graham-platners-wife-says-shes-really-angry-his-extramarital-sexting-was][https://www.frontpagemag.com/communist-nazi-maine-senate-candidate-cheated-on-his-wife-on-app-with-child-sex-problem/][https://themainemonitor.org/platner-reddit-comments/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Times of India]]'': [[Zelensky]] attacks [[ZNPP|nuclear power plant]] again.''' [https://youtu.be/JRT8jmhBc60]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also [[Main Page/Archive index|Previous Conservapedia Breaking News]]''.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2199240</id>
		<title>User talk:Ed Poor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2199240"/>
		<updated>2026-07-12T22:23:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: ignore drag queens&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Archive: &lt;br /&gt;
[[/1|1]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/2|2]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/4|4]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/5|5]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/6|6]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/7|7]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/8|8]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/9|9]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/10|10]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/11|11]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/12|12]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/13|13]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/14|14]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/15|15]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/16|16]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/17|17]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/18|18]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ed poor grinning.jpg|right|thumb|114px|Ed Poor on campus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- New comments at the bottom, please. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writing Plan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to submit a writing plan. While I haven't been asked for one, I feel this would best help keep me on task and contribute the most productively. You seem to know an awful lot about this wiki stuff, and I'm still new at it, so if you could help me that would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
I think I'd first like to help contribute to the various book articles around the site by adding in examples of the influence of Christianity, as a lot of books have Christian overtones that aren't currently listed. I'm thinking I'd like to start by drawing parallels between the story of Jesus in the Gospels with One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Please let me know if this would be acceptable.--[[User:JeremiahJ|JeremiahJ]] 18:10, 6 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably not. Please email me a draft. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 17 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor, I have submitted a request [[Talk:Atheism#Addition_of_Information_on_Charity_and_External_Links_Request|here]] but it was never attended to. Could you please have a look at it? Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:19, 28 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Image Upload Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
I am new here. Can you upload these images please.&lt;br /&gt;
https://puresocialnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/PA-Reg-Trends-1024x576.png&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.wikispeedia.org/seth_keshel_photo_2021-07-11_17-39-09.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I create Seth_Keshel page, but today its gone. Not sure how to proceed.&lt;br /&gt;
-James Pruett&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed Poor, I hope this message finds you doing well. I was wondering if you could upload [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Young_Galaxy_Accreting_Material.jpg this image] for use in the article I recently created. I look forward to hearing your response. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:32, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello Ed Poor, could you please add [[Atheism and the suppression of science]] to [[Template:Nb Atheism|this template]]? I really appreciate it! With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:14, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hello Ed Poor, I need two more images for the article I created which are available [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Independent_assortment_%26_segregation.svg here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Lennox.jpg here]. Recently, [[User:JMR10]] uploaded my previous one, for which I am thankful. Could you ask him to do the same for these two or could you please do these for me? I highly appreciate it. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:40, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I seem to have messed up the Ada article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My proxy keeps dropping stuff, so the picture at the top is busted.  Also, I had to cut down the reference, because the captcha can't make it through.  It should have a left bracket, and h,t,t,p, etc., and a right bracket after the &amp;quot;pdf&amp;quot;. I wonder if you could please fix it for me.  I will contact Andy about getting my IP range restored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I was going to put in the talk page (and will do once things get straightened out) is that the two cited articles are very shallow, having only 7 and 3 sentences, respectively.  They both refer to a &amp;quot;plan&amp;quot;, but that's because the word &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been coined in the computer context.  She really was the first person to write &amp;quot;code&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry about this.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:08, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I read her notes, and it doesn't look like a [[computer program]] to me. A charitable view might be that it's a [[specification|spec]], but there's no flowchart and no [[source code]]. Don't be sorry, just get it right. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:21, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What did you expect this &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; to look like?  The term &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; implies both a programming language and &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot; that the source code is assembled or compiled into.  Assemblers, compilers, and programming languages wouldn't be invented for another hundred years (by Grace Murray Hopper, John Backus, and others.)  The same goes for the other accoutrements of modern software development, like flow charts and specifications.  In fact, even the terms &amp;quot;software&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been invented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, assuming that you accept that she had to write &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot;, what would you expect machine code to look like for a machine that reads its instructions with rods poking through holes in large punched cards running around on a track, and does its arithmetic by counting teeth on turning gears?  It wouldn't look much like Intel 586 code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact is, the lines of Ada's written algorithm were intended to be punched into lines of holes in Babbage's cards, once the &amp;quot;analytical engine&amp;quot; was built, which it wasn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, what I was being &amp;quot;sorry&amp;quot; for was not the content of my edit, but the fact that an extremely buggy proxy messed up the article and wouldn't let me fix it, despite several tries.  Andy has been working with me to fix the network problems, and DMorris fixed the broken picture and hyperlink while my access was broken.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 20:39, 6 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then it would be more accurate to say that she described an algorithm. That's not the same as a computer program, even if she was hoping that Babbage's machine might be programmed to carry out the algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An encyclopedia should be precise and unbiased, not used to create &amp;quot;factoids&amp;quot; for use in publicity campaigns, such as promoting [[women in science]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't say she had to write machine code, but rather to be the &amp;quot;first programmer&amp;quot; she would have had to produce a [[computer program]]. If you have seen it, please show it to me. Otherwise, I'm going to make an editorial decision that she produced an algorithm rather than a program. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:18, 7 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Let's say that [[Ada Lovelace]] wrote one of the first comprehensive descriptions of an algorithm to generate [[Bernoulli numbers]]. But until I see the actual sequence of instructions, including [[if-then]] or [[loop control]] statements, I'd hesitate to call it an actual [[computer program]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:17, 17 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The anti-Semitism of liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
I love how libs reveal their true selves.  No matter what we say or do in describing them, they come here just to confirm it all.  So when they want to emphasize &amp;quot;Jew&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;karajou&amp;quot;, I'll be more then happy to get a gold Magen David to wear around my neck, join my brothers and sisters in the synagogue every week, and show everyone else just how hate-filled and intolerant these liberals really are.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:20, 12 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please help! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! I tried to add the information for Edo to the Tokyo article and for some reason,. it stripped a bunch of stuff out when I saved. Now when I try and revert the edit I made, I keep getting a internal server 500 error. Please can you revert for me? [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:19, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's ok, I fixed it! [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:30, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm glad it worked out for you. My Japanese name is &amp;quot;Edo&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:04, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice speed on reverts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You beat me to every one! Nicely done--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:05, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. I'll pass that on to my secret bot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:10, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks for noticing me ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must be doing something right. Every time I mention alternate viewpoints, and no one sees fit to revert my edits, I get vandalism to my talk page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:48, 10 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jeb Bush ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm trying to reorganize the information, not leave it out. If you notice, I'm working on the article quite a bit. May I please revert your revision? [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:05, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sure. I'm frequently too bold and hasty. And that's the wonderful thing about a wiki. Nothing is ever really deleted; it's all in the article history. Go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:09, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technical question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm lobbying for a separate namespace for the Conservapedia Bible Project. The idea is that each verse gets its own ''article'', which can be used rather as a template. I see a couple of advantages:&lt;br /&gt;
*verses can be quoted more easily: instead of copying the whole verse, only a short link (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; ) is neccessary to get a neat result: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*thereby, the use of the CBP is encouraged over other translations.&lt;br /&gt;
*if there is a change in the CBP, the afflicted verses don't have to be tracked down manually, but the change is applied automatically throughout the wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To accomplish this, a new namespace has to be created. That shouldn't be too difficult, as there are only a few exemplary pages prefixed with ''CBP:'' at this moment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But after this, the namespace has to be filled with the existing translated verses. My question: is your bot up to this task?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 10:53, 8 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== madonna ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, please strongly reconsider your desire to create a &amp;quot;kinder article.&amp;quot; In stating that madonna is a person who has changed to being more spiritual you are buying to the liberal media's lies. It sounds like a madonna fan attempting to weave their bias in, which of course you are not. I think you may want to do more research, and read my recent additions as she is still, if not more so, a wicked and hateful person who has sucked millions of children into raunchy culture, dated murderers and mocked our Lord Jesus Christ who gave his life for us. Madonna deserves only the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:14, 14 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And I just had a long conversation with some Wikipedians in Central Park last month, about whether CP is more neutral than WP. Now you want &amp;quot;conservative bias&amp;quot; to denounce [[Madonna Ciccone]]? Not even Wikipedia's BLP policy would allow that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder whether you are a liberal '''tempting me''' to add bias, just so you can accuse us of being biased. Well, if so, I choose not to cooperate, my dear elf. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:45, 14 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Legolas here might be a parodist. Would you mind looking into him? [[User:NickP|NickP]] 00:12, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, your compassion sounds a little misplaced to me. Do you also visit the Fred Phelps, Bernie Madoff, Ted Bundy, and Charles Manson pages asking people for some &amp;quot;Christian charity&amp;quot; to tone those down too? Look into me all you want please. I dislike Madonna because she has mocked our lord Jesus Christ. Conservative people have respect for Christ end of story. The reason society has degraded is by giving raunchy people like madonna a free pass and pity. I'm the one who wants to print the ACTUAL history of madonna that the liberal media has left out such her dating the felon Chris Paciello. I only want the truth about her in the article. Why is that so bad? I thought this was the one place that might allow the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:34, 17 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ed, can you please look into this guy? He is an obvious parodist. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 15:55, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
First of all - Ed is a senior sysop at this site - I don't know why a few of you have taken upon yourself to post on [[User talk:Aschlafly|Andy's talk page]] when Ed is more than capable of dealing with an alleged parodist on his own. Secondly, just because he is posting radical things on a talk page does not make him a parodist. Looking at his contributions, you ''could'' argue that he is edit warring, but since Ed is simultaneously the user in the revert war and an admin, it is up to his judgement as to whether or not a block is deserving. Your collective alarmism has now spread across three talk pages. That's enough.--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 16:00, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::@NickP, your very.... quick to call somebody else a parodist. Why not leave that to the pro.'s to decide?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:06, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Several others have also pointed out the fact that he acts very suspicious. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:13, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Saying he &amp;quot;acts suspicious&amp;quot; and saying he's a 100% no way im wrong about this Parodist is two completely different things.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:16, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I prefer what Wikipedia old-timers used to call &amp;quot;soft security&amp;quot;. Just help me fix the articles in question. Everything will sort itself out. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:34, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==EdBot==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I left three (actually six) problem Categories that need some sort of merging at [[User_talk:EdBot]]. Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, EdBot did not survive the MediaWiki upgrades. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:21, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Does that mean it's all got to be done manually? Moving 200 entries into another Category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Only if they really have to be moved. (Meanwhile, if anyone has an idea how a bot can &amp;quot;log in&amp;quot; with the new MediaWiki software, let me know.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot#Logging_in This] should help. Indeed, the whole [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot page] is quite interesting. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:40, 19 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A request concerning recent events ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm very sorry to come to you with this, but I honestly don't know where else to turn at this point.  You have always struck me as the voice of reason and level-headedness here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply put: the current altercation on Andy's talk page is out of control.  I recognize that I have no authority to tell sysops what they should or shouldn't do, but it seems to me that basic common courtesy calls for not filling up Andy's talk page with arguments and accusations.  Moreover, the very public nature of the dispute is encouraging other users to join in.  Some of them are doubtless sincere; others, I suspect, may in fact be parodists seeking to fan the flames (I notice a LOT of recently created accounts.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless, the fact remains that Andy's talk page has been turned into a general forum for accusations and arguments.   At this point, it's degenerated to the level where people are making absolutely vicious personal attacks against certain of the participants.  (Kudos to JamesWilson for promptly reverting the most egregious of these.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know the other sysops better than most of us; you talk to them; I would certainly hope they trust and respect your opinion.  Is there anything you can do to persuade them to take a step back, cool down, and wait for Andy to respond at this point?  Everyone involved has made their positions clear; further acrimony can serve no useful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry to trouble you with this, but I really feel that this is both inconsiderate to Andy and deleterious to the Conservapedia project as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:05, 28 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the vote of confidence, but shouldn't I check with Andy before barging in? It may be that he prefers to let everyone air their opinions. It is not just his courage but his wisdom and compassion that attracted me to this project. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:59, 5 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[User:MRellek]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, per the site owner, Administrators [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Guidelines&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=892763 &amp;quot;instructions...are to be followed&amp;quot;] is no longer operable. I have emailed you a copy of Mr. Schlafly's approval.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, sorry. I was hasty. Feel free to unban MRellek, if you feel I was out of line. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, Ed. I'm trying to get the other sysops to do more warnings &amp;amp; shorter blocks; let's get a sense of community here. After all, we've known many of these editors (the RW neighbors) for several years now.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:37, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel. I invited someone to edit Conservapedia and they were blocked and they should not have been. I got the block overturned. So I think there is room for improvement in Conservapedia's blocking policy. You can sign up [[User:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. I invited active Syops/Admins plus people with blocking rights who might wish to be Sysops. If I left anyone out, please let them know about the panel.  The people with blocking rights can sign up [[User talk:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. The panel will probably convene when Iduan is back from his summer vacation or fairly soon afterwards.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:47, 13 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think I got signed up somehow, after jumping into a discussion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can we have non-sysops on the panel? I'd like to invite a friend from Wikipedia to join it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:00, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== If I understand correctly, you are the local math expert. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If so, maybe you can take a look at [[Relativistic mass|this]] and some of that editor's other contributions. They seem pretty obscure/specialized for the general reader, to me, at least. Thanks! [[User:MrMorganH|MrMorganH]] 10:15, 14 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not an expert, but I know a lot about high school math. Andy's brother knows much more than I do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:55, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Revert ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good morning (afternoon?) Ed, why was my comment reverted? I can't see why it should be? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:54, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gosh, you're quick on the trigger. See your talk page for my response. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:58, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I am indeed quick on the trigger, I like Westerns you see..:-)  I have responded to you on my talk-page and re asked the question in a more cordial manner. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:59, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Conservapedia  Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings have begun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel proceeding have begun here:  [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings]] You can start making your edits to the page should you wish to do so.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:59, 17 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Farewell ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, in all sincerity you are by far the most interesting person I have met at Conservapedia.  I regret that we couldn't get along better, though we did manage to improve a number of things.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:12, 18 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We'd have gotten along better if we more goals in common. Building a trustworthy encyclopedia apparently was not one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=893745 this drive by attack] you dodged my request for specific instances of the problem you complained of. (Note: saying &amp;quot;all of them&amp;quot; is a a typical liberal dodge. That's like global warming alarmists saying, &amp;quot;Just look at the temperature record; the evidence is all there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For those listening in to this fascinating drama, the difference between real science and liberal junk science is that real scientists provide examples of what they're talking about, so that anyone can check it out and see for themselves. Liberals and other pseudoscientists '''pretend''' that they've already made the point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It reminds me of Japan, which always (1) says that it &amp;quot;already apologized&amp;quot; for the [[comfort women]] episode while steadfastly (2) refusing ever to admit that it did anything wrong. They are hoping we'll all be too polite to mention that #1 contradicts #2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice try on the parting shot, but your pretense of trying oh so hard fools no one. You're always welcome to come back if you '''ever''' choose to help this project instead of undermining it with trickery. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pontiac==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for your help archiving my page.  I know you are very experienced with Wikis, but I was wondering why you removed what I wrote about the government shut down of Pontiac destroying American history.  A lot of people were really upset about Pontiac's closure and there are lots of websites and articles proving this, why can't it be in the article?  I will differ to your judgement because you are so experienced, but just want to understand your reasoning. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 22:46, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can't be in the article until you find a way to make it trustworthy. Use references. You can't just write stuff off the top of your head, because you are not an established author. You are in fact an anonymous person, and we don't even know whether Craig is your real name. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If there's a lot of proof for your assertion, be sure to provide references, like:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The New York Times reported that after GM was taken over by the government, brands like Saturn and Pontiac were sold or eliminated (link and/or date)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you need help formatting references, lots of people here can help. But '''you''' must supply them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:43, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Pictures==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, how do I add pictures?  --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 16:08, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can't add pictures, until you've made enough useful contributions to earn upload rights. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:34, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In addition, Craig, you can use [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]] until you earn uploading privileges. A Sysop will do it for you.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 21:59, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll work even harder to earn my rights!   I also wanted to apologize for being so familiar, my mom pointed out that I should be calling you Mr. Poor. I always call adults by their last names in real life, but on the internet I usually forget.  Also thanks Mr. Wilson for your advice about upload requests. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 13:24, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::No worries. I wouldn't mind if you called me James or Jim, but I'm glad your mother has taught you well. Also, you will need a lot more work to earn uploading privileges, just so you know. Happy editing in the meantime!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 14:21, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit conflict ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just got edit conflicted by you on the Morse code page - what are the odds we'd both be working on it! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:19, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One thought leads to another ... not such long odds. Sorry about stepping on your work. Feel free to revert, and I'll recover later. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Its all OK, I added my work to your version. Great minds think alike, more like an average mind in my case but you catch my drift...:-) [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:24, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== signature ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you don't mind, but I borrowed the format of your signature to use for my own. It's simple and to the point, but looks nice as well, so I thought I would use it as well. Thank you! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:02, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I copied mine from someone else, so &amp;quot;[[Pay It Forward]].&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:27, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, ok. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:23, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== like wikipedia? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i looked up [[milk]] and [[butter]] how is this conserivtive? is it like wikipedia at all what can i add? ty. --[[User:Rainbowboiz|Rainbowboiz]] 00:35, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not unless your spelling improves. And we are not so much &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; as [[trustworthy]]. Unlike Wikipedia, we really do try to avoid political bias. Add anything that is correct and useful. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:17, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meat Loaf ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know his stage name is much better known (I'm writing the article on him, obviously), but wouldn't you think using the subject's real name is more appropriate for an encyclopedia? If you think the article should be titled under his stage name, you're the boss, but I thought I might want to point that out. Thanks!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 11:14, 1 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me as I am fairly new to this wiki.  I have attempted to propose a discussion for deletion on this particular page.  Before disccussing this, I have followed the instructions on templates via the help index [[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Articles_for_deletion]] to add it to a discussion for deletion but this does not seem to work so I have not proceded further - with hindsight I should have guessed there was something wrong by the lack of entries on this page.  &lt;br /&gt;
My reason for wishing to commence this discussion is that I suspect the article (created by a user who does not appear to have an active talk page) seems to me to be parody and trolling to debase the credibility of this project.  In my opinion, most of the logic followed in nearly every assertion is spurious and often uses blatant synthesis that a ten year old could question.  It is to such an extent that I don't think an &amp;quot;improved&amp;quot; version would be posible.  Of course, others may have different oppinions which is why I am trying to be fair and open it for rational discussion.  What is the correct procedure?  Thank you in advance - answer to my talk page [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 19:54, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure what the correct procedure is. Maybe you could post on the talk page, showing a few examples of &amp;quot;spurious&amp;quot; assertions. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:46, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok I can do this, but I'm surprised that hte Help feature supplies a redundant page on discoussing articles for deletion.  I was also under the impression that you had Sysop/Admin powers and would be familiar with such policies as it is a feature on other wikis.  [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 13:31, 8 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually I know policy fairly well and do have Sysop/Admin powers. Either provide the requested examples, or drop the matter. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:47, 10 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sid 3050 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sid 3050 was blocked for three month for ''trolling''. The only edit he made during the day before his block seems to be to answer to your question in a section above (''So, will it go away if you ignore it?'') - see his [[Special:Contributions/Sid 3050|list of contributions]]. You had personally addressed this comment (''But I'll take a look at Sid's material below now, just to be a good sport.''), so you should be able to judge whether such a comment is ''trolling''. Could you please review Sid's block? In a timely fashion? Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 09:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sid was trolling. Whether this justifies a three month block is up to the admin in question. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm always open to suggestions for making Conservapedia more trustworthy. If you have anything specific in mind, please speak up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of particular interest to me would be any material relating to the contrast between conservative and liberal viewpoints on American political issues, as well as philosophy, religion and science. To my regret, repeated invitations to include users who are ideological opponents of this project have not met with an enthusiastic response. It's almost as if they wish to conceal their ideological differences; ironically, this could be seen as self-censorship. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If anyone wants to describe liberal POV here they may, provided only that it is clearly labeled as such - not presented as gospel. This should not be an onerous requirement: it's the same as Wikipedia's NPOV policy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:42, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Help! A user called CortA is currently vandalising articles. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:15, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, Andy blocked him. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misled by RonLar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was quite astonished by your last actions. I slept over it and want to clarify my earlier remark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd appreciate if you would be less generous with your slight innuendos (''&amp;quot;thanks for nothing!&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;misled by RonLar&amp;quot;''): these make it difficult to assume ''good faith'' on your side. And they have the annoying tendency to backfire...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*my statement ''&amp;quot;Where is the right place to propose an alternative viewpoint? Surely not in the article itself, but on its talk-page. This is a simple necessity for all protected articles, but a good idea for most of those articles some sysops feel strongly about.&amp;quot;'' is hardly misleading - even though it is not written by a native speaker! In fact, it is echoing the sentiments of Conservapedia's [[Conservapedia:Editing etiquette|editing etiquettes]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should discuss changes made by an Administrator before reverting their edits. Administrators are charged with seeing that article content is in line with Conservapedia guidelines. [[Edit war]]ring with an Administrator usually results in a temporary block.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should not alter the editorial content of an article away from a [[conservative]], or [[Christian]], or [[family friendly]] &amp;quot;tone&amp;quot; without discussing proposed changes on the talk page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'''Never make substantial edits to an article without discussing your changes first on the talk page. If you have a reasonable expectation that other editors will accept your change(s), the changes are just formatting / copy editing, you should proceed.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inserting an alternative viewpoint is most certainly a ''substantial edit'' - and the etiquettes advise you to discuss such an edit at first on the talk-page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So, I made a true statement, in accordance with Conservapedia's policy on editing, and you '''misread''' it. To reiterate: You weren't '''misled''', you simply '''misread''' it. And this misunderstanding (of your part) you took as a reason to erase the whole section and seemingly not to read the rest of my comment? Deleting a section on censorship is always a little bit ironic...  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*BTW: whether the article is protected or not is not of any interest for the discussion of censorship! A library does not only censor the books it throws from it shelves, but the books it doesn't allow into it shelves in the first place!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I put the whole section up [[User:RonLar|here]], so you can read it carefully again. Take your time, but nevertheless, react timely - you said that  would be important....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 12:05, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:At this point, I think it's become abundantly clear that complaining about censorship will get you nowhere.  I realize users will come up and be frustrated by certain site traditions, but that's just the way Conservapedia is run, RonLar.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 13:41, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry, I thought you were saying the article was protected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I'm astonished to think that you consider adding alternative viewpoints to be something that has to be '''cleared''' with a sysop first. My understanding of project policy is that all contributors are free to describe non-conservative, non-Christian views ... especially on an article describing a controversy between the two sides. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:38, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Apology accepted. Perhaps you could revert your reaction to this misunderstanding by reintroducing the section which you erased from your talk-page?&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please read [[User:RonLar#Again, the previous example of ideological censorship, in detail]] - all of it, not only the first sentence. This should answer some of your questions.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please address the incident which I mentioned there.&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 16:56, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Eh? I thought you wanted help. Please answer my question: Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:39, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::How is it a sensible use of my time to answer new questions  when you seem to ignore my answers to your old ones? Please remember your statements:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Unless you can show at least one diff, where a senior editor censored something ... merely because it disagreed with some conservative shibboleth ... than you ought to stop saying this. I address this not so much to you, as to those who follow you or travel alongside you.'' }}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::and&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''I asked for an instance of ideological censorship.''}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, you find it here: [[User:RonLar#Again.2C_the_previous_example_of_ideological_censorship.2C_in_detail]] Of course I am willing to answer any question concerning this specific example of censorship, especially those which indicate that you read the whole comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 02:41, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nearly two weeks later: Did you take a look? Or even better, did you read the whole thing? [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 18:17, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-Clancy cracks? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general I'm a Clancy fan but I think some of the criticism you removed was valid. For example by the time he wrote &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; his standards of research had perceptibly dropped (The AH-64 has a 20mm gun? Really?) and &amp;quot;Red Rabbit&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Teeth of the Tiger&amp;quot; were frankly rubbish. Maybe some of the criticisms should stay? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:09, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Anything can stay if properly sourced: X said Y about Z. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:10, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What would be an acceptable source? I have all Clancy's books; would they be acceptable sources for pointing out declining standards of technical accuracy? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:20, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::LOL, '''your''' interpretation of Clancy's writings would be (what is called at Wikipedia) original research. If you don't know what I meant by 'properly sourced', then you're unqualified to contribute anything further to this project. If you do know, you're just toying with me. Godspeed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough. What I'd do is reference both Clancy's books and technical sources that contradict them, such as the fact that the AH-64 does NOT have a 20mm gun. Like I said I'm generally a Clancy fan - &amp;quot;Without Remorse&amp;quot; may just be the best thriller ever written - but his last few books have been a bit disappointing and his research has definitely slipped. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:28, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What I would propose is to remove the comments about &amp;quot;The sum of all fears&amp;quot; - a nuclear weapon could be built with a table saw and a small lathe, never mind optical milling equipment - but keep and expand on the comment about the declining level of technical accuracy. The divergence of the Ryanverse from reality isn't important because it IS fiction, but the declining level of research and tendency towards unrealistic assessments of real-world capabilities IS important. For example &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; is utterly unrealistic even in the Ryanverse. If China invaded Russia they'd get about ten feet over the border before being annihilated. The fortifitions on the Sino-Russian border make the Maginot line look like a sand castle on the beach, and they were actually designed by strategic thinkers. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:44, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On second thought, maybe I'm being too hard on you. I recently started tutoring schoolchildren, and I'm learning to be more patient with their quaint notions. After all, making wrong guesses and getting them corrected is often the best way to learn. Shall I not condescend to grant you the same grace? ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've read all Tom Clancy's [[Jack Ryan]] and [[John Clark]] novels. I always assumed that any discrepancies were inserted on purpose; Clancy certainly would have no reason to put correct information on how to make a suitcase-sized nuclear bomb in his books: what conservative would want to inspire a copycat crime? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to include &amp;quot;criticism&amp;quot; by some published author who says an attack helicopter does or does not have a certain sized gun, go ahead. He's also not very accurate about the software used in the stock market, although it was a key plot element in ''[[Debt of Honor]]''. (Come to think of it, if a man knew everything and wanted to make money betting on horse races, he would know not to put all his winnings on the next race (&amp;quot;[[John Doe]]&amp;quot; TV series pilot). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:56, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Language ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Big_Bang_theory Language like this] makes me extremely uncomfortable: &amp;quot;when grownups talk&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;woman's logic is strange, don't you think&amp;quot;, etc. (especially this in his earlier statements: &amp;quot;and being educated briefly by my grandpa in matters &amp;quot;of faith&amp;quot;, mostly about &amp;quot;Catholic errors&amp;quot;, and the absolute need to be trufhful, my concern was that the Catholics are wrong on one more point since the Big Bang was proven wrong in 1985&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I am not a woman. My identity is very well known and I am quite easy to find. Ottava means eight, and Ottava Rima means Eight Rhyme, a type of rhyming pattern used in Italian epic poetry. Second, his language is condescending, misogynistic, religiously bigoted, etc. Third, his claims about the Big Bang Theory are rather strange, conspiratorial, and nothing I have ever heard by any legitimate scientist. I cannot honestly believe that he is a real conservative but I believe he is a plant just like many of the people who vandalize. His job is to produce some of the most absurd stuff to try and make conservatives look awful. If I am wrong, I am wrong, but his language does not seem like something that is appropriate. I talked to Geoff Plourde about this quite a bit tonight because it bothered me a lot. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:44, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Um ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism and obesity]] - is this a joke? It seems to be just a list of fat atheists. It even has random tidbits like &amp;quot;Chuck Norris endorses the Total Gym exercise system.[59]&amp;quot; I know many priests who are overweight, and many religious people who are. I know many atheists who are ultra thing and anorexic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Christian and Library of Congress researcher's explanations of reports of UFOs &amp;quot; How would that even deal with atheism and obesity? Yet it is in there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page looks like it was created to make Conservapedia and conservatism look really bad. Sigh. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:58, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:User:Conservative is good at attracting readership to this website. The [[Atheism and obesity]] seems to me a bit of payback for the liberals who call Rush Limbaugh a big, fat idiot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And in his payback, he demeans everyone who is overweight, including myself. I've dealt with mean-spirited behavior from people about weight the majority of my life - there is no acceptable reason for being hostile about the issue. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 16:53, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== You were looking for ideological censorship? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bestiality&amp;amp;curid=88619&amp;amp;diff=920267&amp;amp;oldid=920266 easy to find] --[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 23:52, 23 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not as easy as you say. See [[Talk:Bestiality]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:44, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Senior Admin assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, I would like to bring something to your attention as a senior administrator. I have been in private communication with User:SamCoulter over the last few weeks. There is nothing in his attitude and comments to me in private and his behaviour here on Conservapedia to suggest this user is anything but sincere. He was recently blocked for the edit [http://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/SamCoulter here] (the last edit he made - I will not link directly to it because the topics are extremely offensive and not family friendly). For this effort he was blocked for three months. His edit was a) relevant b) correct according to the article linked and c) was a link which was on the front page already. It seems that some users wanted to quote the article without implying the articles conclusions as they were at loggerheads with a users personal opinion. I don't think the user should have been blocked but now he is I won't remove it but I do believe that 3 months is extremely heavy-handed. I don't want to create controversy so I will not chnage the block myself but I am bringing this up with you and User:Karajou also (I am unable to contact the blocking sysop). Thank you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:11, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Keep him blocked. He vandalized twice. In fact, I am going to increase the time blocked. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:02, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Do you have evidence of this vandalism? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:04, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If you want to defend those recent contributions be my guest. If you want to wrangle with me about them, it is not going to happen. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I tell you now '''there was no vandalism''' you are blocking a user for adding sourced and factual material. You are blocking him for no reason! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but it's actually very easy to avoid a block. I suggest you start coaching new users about courtesy, project goals, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I myself disagree with the project goals of RW, but they haven't given me any long blocks. Why? Because I follow their rules in their house.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adolescents often have trouble figuring out what the rules are, or trouble realizing the benefits of following them. (In the long run, civil disobedience campaigns against beneficial institutions such as Democracy and Free Markets simply backfire.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:52, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I respectfully disagree with you. It's incredibly ''easy'' to get blocked on this site, because honestly, it appears to depend on the whim of the blocking editor (doesn't like what's being said because it's contrary to the blocking editor's opinion, got up on the wrong side of the bed, had a fight with someone in real life and are taking it out on editors here at CP.) You yourself just handed out an ''infinite'' block for ''defending'' someone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Many editors, myself included, have protested User:Conservative's articles and his method of defending them. If anyone objects, he automatically deems them an atheist/evolutionist, etc., which at least in my case, is far from the truth. I object to several things. First, his use of &amp;quot;obese&amp;quot; as a ''ad hominem'' attack against people whose ideas he disagrees with. I've dealt with bullying behavior about weight most of my life, and have tried to point out to him how hurtful his taunts are, but he thinks it's amusing, and the other sysops here (yourself included) appear to agree. I'm all for a good discussion about ''ideas'', but when the attacks become personal, and all-inclusive, then yes, I'm going to protest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Second, most of the articles are just ''badly, badly written''. They meander ''miles'' away from the original topic, they tend to be a bunch of quotes lumped together, and in many of them, the point that he's trying to make is missed completely. The actual subjects might be valid, and important enough to warrent an article on them, but creating 10 articles that say the same thing, and that can (and should) be consolidated into one, '''''well-researched and well-written document''''', is just poor scholarship. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:53, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, thank you for not giving me an excuse to block you! ;-) Very well written . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As I've said elsewhere, [http://ameriwiki.wikkii.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;amp;diff=4073&amp;amp;oldid=4071] I disagree with the stance of &amp;quot;the admin&amp;quot; who is making ''[[ad hominem]]'' attacks on atheists; I think it's a misguided attempt to attract readership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If anyone's had a '''good''' edit reverted for a bad reason, they can just let me know. Just remember: if anyone is criticizing to condemn, I'm not interested, but if they want me to change things, I'm the man who can do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:03, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BrentH's block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see you blocked BrentH for trolling and reverted 2 of his edits. He linked [[Professor]] to an existing article here on CP, [[Professor values]]. Why was that trolling? --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 19:55, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps prior edits?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 20:01, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::User: Ed Poor did not appreciate the section right above this one--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 21:14, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::BrentH made a perfectly reasonable and respectful suggestion. It would appear from the edit history that he was referring to an article about Winona Ryder, created by Ed Poor, which contained one piece of trivia but no basic information regarding the person whatsoever. What BrentH said is simply common sense, and I too cannot see how this can justify a block. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 22:45, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Indeed, certain longstanding members of this community seem to have rather thin skin.  I did not see BrentH's post as offensive or out of line--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 22:54, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This is an encyclopedia. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You wrote that on my talkpage. ''This is an encyclopedia.''. Well, if it is articles like [[bestiality and Britain]] ahould be deleted because, as I have pointed out numerous times, it has nothing to do with bestiality and Britain. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:27, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Article deleted. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=delete&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1]&lt;br /&gt;
::Hey thanks Ed. Just for the record though I wasn't &amp;quot;bothered&amp;quot; by the content so much as bothered by the ''lack'' of content. As the commandments say - everything must be true and verifiable which that article clearly wasn't. Many thanks. I must admit - I have a lot of respect for you and karajou. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ed, evolution was birthed in Britain and secularism has grown rampant in their country. Now their society is a mess and there is rioting in the streets. In addition, the'' Guardian'' just published a puff piece on bestiality. I say enough is enough and it's time their moral rot is exposed. I realize that pointing out that folly and consequences of atheism/evolutionism annoys liberals, but so what. Not only are they grossly and obviously in error, but atheists/evolutionists have shown themselves [[Atheism and cowardice|to be timid little bunnies]]. I restored the article because I feel confident that Conservapedia can stand up to foolish and timid little bunnies. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:21, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Enough with the insults conservative. I am neither a liberal nor an atheist and am sick to death of you accusing me of such. The article has nothing, I repeat '''nothing''' about the practice in Britain. I say again '''nothing'''. You poor scholarship is on show and we can ''all'' see it. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:02, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ed, a Brit was trying to bring over his deviant farming practices to the United States as can be seen [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7600523/British-man-51-arrested-at-bestiality-farm.html HERE]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:28, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::You misread the article, Conservative. The Oregon farm is owned by an American. The British man was visiting it. Read [http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-seattle/seattle-convicted-cocaine-smuggler-arrested-likely-into-bestiality-liking-sex-with-animals here] for a version of the story that makes who owned the farm clearer. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keldaby goats.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|An exclusive British art gallery was criticised for displaying a highly offensive bestiality oriented painting which featured a [[goat]] just yards from The Ritz hotel and where it could be seen by children.- The Daily Mail online (MailOnline), August 5, 2011 ''The explicit art that shows bestiality with a goat just yards from The Ritz'']]&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::There is no way I'd let children any where this site with Conservatives despicable articles all over the place. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Max, I heard Oregon was pretty liberal. It figures the farm was in Oregon. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:30, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::I heard that most states are pretty liberal... But that doesn't make the rumors true. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 22:34, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Oregon voted for Obama plus fairly recently they had the most atheists per capita in the United States. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:57, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Omaha, Nebraska also voted for obama but calling it liberal is very silly--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:58, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/new-poll-identifies-most-liberal-and-conservative-states/ Oregon is liberal] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:07, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm slightly confused as to why it's relevant or not that Oregon is liberal. After all the state DOES have a law against bestiality, so that argues against liberals being tolerant of it. --[[User:ColSharp|ColSharp]] 08:33, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Since when do liberals obey the laws on the books in the first place? This photo [http://www.conservapedia.com/File:1915b7ec753fa9d0352885dc23da4469.jpg] is proof that liberals have no intention of obeying laws regarding littering.  They trashed Washington D.C. ''when they got their way'', January 20, 2009.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:10, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's a law in New Jersey about recycling, yet I know several conservatives who refuse to recycle. Why is this? [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 13:26, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request for Admin assistance  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To all senior admins and sysops. I am being repeatedly abused by user:conservative who, among other things, accuses me continuously of being an atheist simply because I point out some of the holes in his articles. See [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;curid=113357&amp;amp;diff=924642&amp;amp;oldid=924636 here for the latest accusation]. I have asked him numerous times to desist with his sneering name calling as I find it offensive to have my faith questioned and nothing is ever done. He state’s I am atheist because I don’t agree with some of his ridiculous contentions. In actual fact it isn’t even that I disagree with him it is that I point out his shoddy research, poor scholarship and his berating, insulting and sarcastic behaviour towards others. I am of the opinion now that he is purposely calling me names because he knows I don’t like it which is unchristian, impolite and, above all, insulting. Is anyone going to teach this man some manners? Has Conservapedia become a place where Conservative is allowed to behave this way without any warning or comeuppance but all other editors and warned and blocked for minor infractions.  He is in continual violation of the commandments yet NOTHING is done whereas people like myself are always watching out to avoid being banned. Well, fine, ban me if you like. I probably will be after this posting and no doubt Conservative will cackle with glee at “winning” again. But laugh Conservative, you win nothing. I post this is full knowledge that I might be blocked banned and insulted by you in my absence and I have always remained polite and civil plus I can hold my head up high. Hopefully one of you will take a stand and insist on standards of civility. But I don’t hold out much hope. Thanks, many of you were kind, decent people whom I enjoyed working with and I pray for you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:21, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I am disappointed in you most of all Ed. Coming from wikipedia and being the first to jump on others for incivility you ignore when it comes to the ruling chaste of Conservapedia. You should be ashamed. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:48, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Max, I think you assume entirely too much about my dispositions.  You really don't know what extent I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; or if I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; at all. You also don't know what value I place on &amp;quot;winning&amp;quot;. In fact, you don't even know if I am one person or a team.  I/we remain inscrutable. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:24, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::User:Conservative, this is getting silly. You wrote for instance:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::''Actually KhalidM, I have a very outgoing personality and a university professor friend of mine told me that I would make a great administrator because I can be very diplomatic. While I realize that I will never cultivate a large atheist or liberal fan club, I can live with that. Conservative 20:34, 5 October 2011 (EDT) ''&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, while your grammatical gender may be undetermined, your number isn't. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:44, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== King George I ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article of [[King George I]] was deleted as a ''creation of vandals''. On the talk page I read the comment of User:RJJense: ''I added much new text, all of which I wrote, and previously posted on Citizendium.'' I looked up the article at Citizendium and it seemed to be quite informative - certainly not vandalistic! Could it be restored? I'd like to insert a valid link into [[elector]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I restored the last version by RJJense. I feel confident that his last version was a good article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:34, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks - it really seems so! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;New Ordeal&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I noticed that you placed the quotation marks around the term &amp;quot;New Ordeal.&amp;quot; As you have probably noticed I have been attempting to fix that article. Quite frankly, the article is pretty bad to start with and several of the references that prior authors cited have nothing to do with the topic. Do you know if there is procedure in which this article may be recommended for deletion? --[[User:Padams|Padams]] 15:33, 15 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Better to mark it as an essay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, 19 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block of AugustO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I looked at [[Conservapedia:Editor's_guide#If_you_get_blocked]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you get blocked, it's probably because you (1) broke the rules and (2) ignored hints, requests and/or warnings. So the first thing you should do is review your communications with others here, particularly those who are admins. Have you been trying to get along by following our practices and supporting our goals, or have you been trying to change our ways? If you are new here, it's best to go along to get along. After you have contributed a lot, we'll be more likely to listen to your suggestions, but breaking the rules will just end up with eliminating you from the project. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I can't think of any rule which I broke&lt;br /&gt;
::*I was requested to ''to do some charitable work somewhere instead''. I'm already engaged in such work, so this doesn't apply...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't try to ''change our ways''. I try to correct factual errors (e.g.,  ιδού can be translated as ''at this moment'' or that it is right to call ''Carolus Martellus'' the grandson of ''Carolus Magnus''.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Perhaps upon reflection you may realize that you'd rather be part of the project than insist on your own way. You might want to apologize and get unblocked. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't insist on my own way and I apologize if anyone feels insulted by my criticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you want to discuss your block, '''do not create a new account'''. Rather, use one of the following methods to appeal the decision (listed in order of preference). ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Here, I obviously failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. ''Contact the person who blocked you (see below).&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
2. ''If you get no reply after a reasonable amount of time, you may contact any Administrator.&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
3. ''Email cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com giving the name of the Administrator or editor who blocked you, and the date, and it will be forwarded on to them. &lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you contact more than one person about this, please do them the courtesy of letting them know who else you have tried contacting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
::*This should be obvious from the header of my emails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Contacting an Administrator or editor can usually be done by one of the following methods: ''&lt;br /&gt;
*''Use the &amp;quot;Email this user&amp;quot; link in the toolbox. This, however, will only work if both you and the Administrator or editor have enabled this on your/their respective accounts.&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Administrator or editor may have provided an email address or other contact information (e.g. AIM) on their user page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*This section seems to be obsolete: ''email this user'' doesn't work for any of the administrators I tried to reach. And I couldn't get Ed Poor's email address via his user page. So we are in a [[Catch 22]] kind of situation...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I emailed to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;aschlafy@aol.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;conservapedia@zoho.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. I didn't get any reply (is 1-2 days a ''reasonable amount of time'' to wait? I thinks so...) to my short email which stated: ''I understand that my criticisms of CBP and the World History Lectures are quite unwelcome, but they are hardly trolling! I'd appreciate if you lift my block.''&lt;br /&gt;
::*So I decided to create a new account to appeal the block, hoping that the advice against this action is as obsolete as other sections of the ''editor's guide''.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 07:56, 26 October 2011 (EDT) (AugustO)&lt;br /&gt;
:::August, I think you should start a career in sales. You certainly have the persistence to be a good salesman. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:47, 26 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed Poor, the block of AugustO is now more than a week old. I tried to reach you via various channels - could you please lift the block as the stated reason (&amp;quot;trolling&amp;quot;) doesn't apply? [[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 11:09, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please get a [[writing plan]] from him and get it to me, and I'll consider it. Meanwhile, any sysop is free to unblock him. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:01, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Is that any official Sysop, or anyone with Block rights? I'd be happy to unblock Mr O so that he can post his writing plan.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:25, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::On second thoughts, perhaps I'll just go ahead. Please reverse my action if I'm overstepping the mark.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:33, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thanks for the unblock!&lt;br /&gt;
*I read the article on the [[writing plan]], and I'll try to provide you with one. This would be easier if a ''sample plan'' were provided. But nonetheless, here it is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mainly I'm interested in the CBP. Mind you, I'm not ''Junker Jörg'', I'm not capable to create a translation on my own which stands for hundreds of years. But I think that translating the Bible in a group, and extensively discussing your work is a marvelous way to get a greater insight into the ''Book of books''.  While doing so, I try to dig into what Conservative calls the ''ANE culture'', as you can see [[Talk:John_1-7_(Translated)#Issue_with_translation_of_John_4:53|here]], where I try to shed light on timekeeping during the Roman empire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I came here, I thought that there would be a group of likewise interested individuals, but at the moment there seems to be only one other editor with similar interests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As my approach to the CBP generates quite a few edits on talk-pages, I balance these with edits to articles. These tend to by connected somehow with my namesakes (August of Saxony, Ernest August of Hanover), the history - or just happen on pages where I read something which puzzled me :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:21, 8 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion issue ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be a great idea to merge the articles. In fact, if you were interested in expanding the article, I might be interested in helping.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:28, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please help me organize this. We should give prominence to conservative views, but let's steer away from censoring liberal views. It would be nice if liberals could see '''why''' conservatives believe differently. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:43, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::OK!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:48, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged the articles and added a bit on abortion and political ideology. How is it?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:53, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks for the change but==&lt;br /&gt;
perhaps it should be bed bugs (plural), and now when i make an edit and it goes thru, if i try to make another one i get &amp;quot;Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it&amp;quot; but no one has. Going back to page and trying anew results in the same. 3.1: longetivity should be longevity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus is Lord, thanks[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 07:58, 5 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback here ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback [http://conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Panel_members.2C_please_give_your_feedback_below HERE]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your assistance would be much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:05, 16 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have explained my ideas in private email to you and Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:50, 11 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  a few messages to you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few messages to you here: http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Air_superiority [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:14, 26 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for picking up some of my &amp;quot;wiki litter&amp;quot; that I left behind (redirects to non-existent pages). I will try to be more diligent as far as not littering in the future. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:22, 11 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. And don't bother yourself: it's better for you to focus your time on building the wiki, while less talented contributors like myself do the routine housekeeping. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If I had your writing skill, I'd be making whole article like you do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:34, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A message to you from Cipe ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixing a MediaWiki message: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you perform the edit I described [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;oldid=992864#Edit_request here, on very bottom of the page]? I asked Aschlafly but he's probably busy now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 15:33, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know the basics of Wiki coding and not the advanced level coding. I would ask someone else. Try Ed Poor. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:32, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unfortunately, I cannot edit Ed's talk page. Could you suggest someone different? Or message him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The change is rather small and requires only copy-and-paste. More directly: you can copy contents of this: [[User:Cipe/MW_fix]] to: [[MediaWiki:Revision-info]]. Even if my suggestion is wrong, it can be reverted, so there is no danger. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 16:41, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, I did it. But where can I see the results? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:53, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you very much. You'll see it when checking older revision. Here is an example: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that MediaWiki has a different message when you're checking current revision. I'll prepare fix in a moment. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 17:55, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The message seems to have logged me out. I think it needs fixing. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:56, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I also got logged out, but only once. I can consistently see the new message now. Perhaps the software logs out when a edit to MediaWiki is made. Could you please copy [[User:Cipe/MW fix 2]] to [[MediaWiki:Revision-info-current]]? I promise it's the last change :) It is shown for a permalink to current revision. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:08, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't think that's it. I think you need to put the '''www.''' in front of '''www.conservapedia.com''' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It seems to work. I can see the messages: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546 for past revisions] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=992065 for current revision]. Thanks for changing. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:19, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you for unlocking your talk page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really appreciate being able to get in contact with you directly when the circumstances arise.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 18:39, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
Now he can try to justify what he said about the article. [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 14:29, 14 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== File:GoreFireBreathing.jpg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think it would be appropriate to use this image in the [[Current TV]] article? It's already in Gore's main article, so why not include it in the article about his obscure TV network on channel 9800 on my TV? --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:35, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== apology. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I just wanted to apologise for the comments I made related to you, they were impolite and unnecessary.  I don't have anything against you or anything, I just posted something that I thought was relevent without thinking how it would be taken by anyone other than myself, as it happened they were rude and quite personal.  I acknowledge that I behaved quite badly, and in future I will try to avoid giving you, or others, offense.  So..... virtual handshake?[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 06:18, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, don't be so dramatic. Just comment on the articles and issues of the day, and forget about personalities. That's how this project's supposed to run. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:33, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::lol. Nah it's difficult to tell over the internet how people are reacting, so for all I knew you could have been quite insulted or something, and I had to make sure that I was being very clear. Anyway, cool[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 01:03, 19 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not sure you get it: We don't want personal remarks on this wiki, clear or not. You need to be clear only about one thing: what you intend to write about an article topic. You must not comment on other users in any way. Is '''that''' clear? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== On Personal Attacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As someone who has been the subject of personal comments (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987753&amp;amp;oldid=987715], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987827&amp;amp;oldid=987777], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987956&amp;amp;oldid=987955], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=990739&amp;amp;oldid=990566]), I would like to share my opinion on Conservapedia's policy on personal attacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it is very appropriate to make '''relevant''' comments on editing and other wiki behavior to determine what the best practices are with regards to editing and other actions and, if necessary, to instruct users who may not know better about such practices.  For example, I have informed two administrators about redacting the automatically-generated deletion log entry to remove sensitive material.  I have also asked one administrator to include source information in that user's uploaded images, requests with which this user has complied.  Likewise, if someone has a habit of posting comments on talk pages without signing them, it is appropriate to inform them of how to sign posts.  Further, if someone is about to violate 90/10, a warning is definitely appropriate.  None of these have to do with the real-life '''personality''' that these editors, many of whom are brothers and sisters in Christ, have; these comments focus on on-wiki '''behavior'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, I think that if someone is going to make a statement regarding real-life facts or Conservapedia's commandments, policies, and best practices, it is appropriate to debate this statement '''without going into personality details'''.  Such debate may very well include Socratic or rhetorical questioning as a argumentative device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, Mr. Schlafly is the owner of the site, so he has the final say in this, but I'm sure he would agree with what I have written.  Although attacks on another editor's real-life personality should generally be removed, I do not see the need to remove good-faith debate and discussion over user '''behavior''' at Conservapedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for reading this.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 12:36, 21 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, thanks, Greg. If I err on the side of &amp;quot;absolutely nothing about the person&amp;quot; to an absurd point, please continue to help me out. I'm mainly opposed to comments like, &amp;quot;You're a jerk&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I don't have to follow the rules.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nothing wrong with '''friendly''' personal comments, like, &amp;quot;Thanks for pointing out that a rigid, absolutist enforcement of the rules may not be wise.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hey Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw your Arbcom case over at Wikipedia just today looking through for cases of bias there. :) Wikipedia's - nuts, huh? Lol. I ran into the Obama bias team over there in Scjessey, Wikidemon, and company, back in late 2009. It's become so hopelessly biased by now you've just got to laugh. They know they're keeping all controversy out of the Obama page and how biased they are, and don't care. Well, all my facts are at Conservapedia's services now. :) Anyway, just saying it's nice to see another ex-Wikipedian here I guess - hope we get some more! :) --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Jzyehoshua]] 01:15, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tehpwn3r==&lt;br /&gt;
'User names based on your real name or initials are '''preferred'''' does not state that you will be blocked. [[User:Conservative|Also]].--[[User:Wishnaka|Wishnaka]] 19:51, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inappropriate user name. It has been a general principle that one's user name be &amp;quot;based on one's real first name and last initial&amp;quot;, though there are a number of reasons why that is not always practical. The point is that we don't like the kind of foolish &amp;quot;handles&amp;quot; that are often used in various blogs and social web sites. If you run afoul of this by accident, you will be asked to create a new account, and doing so will not be considered sockpuppetry. Of course, some user names are essentially just vandalism, and are treated that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you don't object, I suggest shortening his block to maybe 3 days. His remark, while rude and impertinent, did have some substance, and a hard block doesn't serve to do anything but cause more unhappiness. Thanks for considering,&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 20:48, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you unblock him, you're responsible. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:54, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I recommend keeping the week. And don't &amp;gt; dont. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:01, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for pointing out the typo.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 23:35, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Michael Baumgartner==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
Please do a careful side-by-side comparison of [[Michael Baumgartner]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Baumgartner&amp;amp;oldid=509330054 the Wikipedia article]. I did a google search on &amp;quot;Michael Baumgartner&amp;quot; and came up with a number of sources including the Wikipedia article.  I took notes from all of the sources, and wrote a new article based on my notes.  I honestly believe that the article uses a different set of sources, covers ideas in a different order, and covers the topic differently than Wikipedia.  Please take another look, and if you agree, please restore [[Michael Baumgartner]]. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:05, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*I understand the workload you face. Could you please look at the article and reconsider? [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:51, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*:Already restored in good faith; I trust you, and I'm not going to compare it closely. I'll leave that to others. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:54, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My condolences ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the death of the Rev Dr Moon. [[User:JuanMotame|JuanMotame]] 18:54, 2 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome. I wonder if you could help me. I tried [[Special:MovePage/William. J. Fulbright]] but apparently I don't have permission. The page should be at [[J. William Fulbright]], the name of the founder of the Fulbright scholarship program.&lt;br /&gt;
:Done.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:26, 4 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sun Myung Moon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You changed the first sentence of the protected article on [[Sun Myung Moon]] from the present to the past tense. Could you take care of the rest of the article, too? Thanks. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:35, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Feel free to take care of that yourself. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I took care of it. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 13:21, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:32, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Requesting Assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Poor,  I'm relatively new here and don't completely know my way around.  Would you please look at my comment concerning [[Talk:American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel|American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel]].  If my view is in line with the site, I'm quite certain that a template or procedure is needed at this point.  If my views are not in line with the site, please feel free to remove that comment as you see fit.  You seem experienced here, so your guidance is requested.  --[[User:Nouniquenames|Nouniquenames]] 00:03, 21 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Psychological manipulation]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that you moved/redirected the above article to [[Essay: Psychological manipulation in the Bible]] on grounds &amp;quot;not a general article; case study uses a Bible story&amp;quot;. I've got somewhat confused about this step, because IMHO the article is general and only the case study section itself contains a &amp;quot;Bible story&amp;quot;. In fact the rest is a combination of various sources, some of them far from having anything to do w/ Bible at all. I was by far not completely done with that article and now I actually do not know how to continue working on it. It says now &amp;quot;This Is An Original Work. Contributors should add their signatures to the end section. If published, a notice will be posted and, if desired, contributors will be recognized.&amp;quot; but that was not my idea at all, I would be more than happy if anyone could help to extend that, in my opinion, general article. If I could suggest anything then I would like to suggest to move only the 'case study' section to the essay realms and keep the rest as general article with hyperlink to that essay in appropriate, perhaps 'See Also' section. I also deem as deficiency that article does not appear in the Psychology category now, I believe it belongs there.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:35, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Objections to evolution]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As for your rationale for redirect on 'Objections to evolution', namely &amp;quot;I thought we already had plenty of articles opposing the Theory of evolution&amp;quot;, I agree with you that &amp;quot;we have&amp;quot;, but still would dare to oppose the redirect on grounds that 'Objections to evolution' is an article that brainwashes people at WP and enjoys special defence by witch-hunters who heavily suppress any different points of view there thus I believe it is of significant importance to have available alternative view on the same topic under the very same title.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:50, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quote Templates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was doing some ''random page'' editing and found that there was a whole load of quote templates you created a while ago that link to nowhere and nothing seems to link to them. It seems the template for linking these quotes never got off the ground. I'm proposing that these either be deleted or put into some sort of quote page as I don't think there much use at the moment (except for possibly taking up server space). Kind Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 02:00, 2 November 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Unificationism]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I am not surprised to see you make changes to the Unificationism page in defense of  your church, but why did you remove the part in which Moon  told an interviewer,  &amp;quot;God is living in me and I am the incarnation of himself.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The whole world is in my hand and I will conquer and subjugate the world.&amp;quot;   [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19459920?print=true]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you saying the BBC made that up?  [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 08:23, 14 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can put that back in. Sorry for the delayed answer; my day job keeps me pretty busy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Be advised, though, that Rev. Moon himself disputed the ''conquer and subjugate'' quote, telling Newsweek interviewers that he had been quoted out of context. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, 20 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Way to stop the spammers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Aschlafly's talk page &lt;br /&gt;
Yesterday after I prayed an idea came to me (most likely from god) to stop the spammers from registering the spam accounts. If we can move away from user captcha and instead use a question that requires some knowledge (for example what team does tim tebow sit on the bench for or which team did he turned around) as the spambots will be completely flummoxed by this. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:16, 19 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The questycaptcha is excellent for this purpose. It stops ocr bots, and most paid spammers. The code would be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   require_once( &amp;quot;$IP/extensions/ConfirmEdit/ConfirmEdit.php&amp;quot; );&lt;br /&gt;
   $wgCaptchaClass = 'QuestyCaptcha';&lt;br /&gt;
   $arr = array (&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;A question?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;An answer!&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;What is this wiki's name?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Conservapedia&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        'Who is Tim Tebow' =&amp;gt; 'An athlete',&lt;br /&gt;
   foreach ( $arr as $key =&amp;gt; $value ) {&lt;br /&gt;
        $wgCaptchaQuestions[] = array( 'question' =&amp;gt; $key, 'answer' =&amp;gt; $value );&lt;br /&gt;
   }&lt;br /&gt;
Which you would place in /rootfiledirectory/localsettings.php[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:54, 19 November 2012 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Given your considerable experience in operating and maintaining wiki's like Wikipedia and convservapedia, do you think you would be able to implement this ? Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 05:12, 23 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A serious Biblical matter==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aschlafly wrote the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. This wouldn't have been to problematic, but now he puts his outlandish idea into an article in the main space ([[Epistle to the Hebrews]]). First he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''the most plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it.'''&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Iduan]] toned this down somewhat, so that we read at the moment:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''one plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it'''.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I couldn't find any Biblical scholar who shares this idea, I couldn't find any authorative figure who promotes this - and this isn't much of a surprise if you read the epistle for yourself!  The only &amp;quot;scholar&amp;quot; who has proposed this &amp;quot;theory&amp;quot; in the last 2000 years is Andrew Schlafly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to delete this sentence, and then I tried to make it clear that this idea is a personal insight by Andrew Schlafly. My edits were reverted:  any reader of this encyclopedia gets the impression that this theory is something commonly known or well discussed. That's utterly untrue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tend to be quite strict on Biblical matters - I'm often accused of being nitpicky.  As one of the sysops of Conservapedia who was active in 2012 I ask you to weigh in on this problem: maybe it is just me and most of the of you and your fellow sysops think that it is acceptable to present an  insight of a single person '''in a Biblical matter''' (an insight shared by virtually no one)  as a plausible theory. But - as the title of this section indicates - for me this is a very serious matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:26, 25 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree. Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, 5 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? &amp;quot;'' As I tried to convey with the phrase &amp;quot;this wouldn't have been to problematic&amp;quot;, there is nothing wrong with the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. But I think it ''is'' problematic that the ''insight'' of the essay spills over into a page in the main space, i.e., [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], and becomes a ''fact'' during this process.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree.&amp;quot;'' It's the other way round: stating the ''insight'' in an article in the main space without making it clear that the only source for this idea is Andrew Schlafly is lending it an improper credibility. If you read an unsourced, unmarked statement in an encyclopedia, the reader generally takes it as a kind of common knowledge, even more so if he is e.g., a high-school pupil.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:28, 6 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a mix of opinion and fact. Each is clearly marked. Talk pages are filled with unsourced claims, and we make very few efforts to police such talk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is currently an unsourced, unmarked statement in an article that needs attention, please point it out to me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you - if unsourced, unmarked statements are reintroduced into the article, I'll point them out to you! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:02, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im new here and need some help. I figured I would go to you since you seem very involved in the community. I recently tried to instate an article about R*tional Wiki and suddenly it was deleted. I thought since we had an article about Wikipedia that we could write about wikis. I also noticed that it had been deleted several times by the same people. Why? The words are spam filtered to. I feel that we need to write about the faults and propaganda of this completely biased website. Not to mention they completely badmouth you in the most rude ways. Please help...--[[User:Colesmithsayshi|Colesmithsayshi]] 14:18, 31 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mass Wedding ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was wanting to know what is the significance of mass weddings in the unification church ? I see your church has recently conducted it's first mass wedding since the very untimely death of the great Sun Myung Moo. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:05, 17 February 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not sure how to respond to messages. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not sure how to answer the message you sent me.  There does not seem to be a way to respond attached to the message you sent.  Do I just respond in this open forum?  Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Math ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings, Ed.  We haven't communicated in quite a while.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason I am writing is that I saw your recent [[Essay:Campaign_to_make_Conservapedia_unusable]].  I know that this has long been an issue, and that you and I have both put a lot of effort into making math/science articles accessible.  I have one comment about it:  ''Your audience for this essay is just yourself.''  All the people who made things inaccessible&amp;amp;mdash;Foxtrot, Lemonpeel, Jaques, etc, are long gone.  So, if you want the situation to improve, instead of writing an essay, you're just going to have to make the improvements yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I'm not sure what articles you have in mind for your criticism.  If it's all the topology stuff ([[Regular_space]], [[Sequentially_compact]], [[Hausdorff_space]], ...), you have my sympathy, and you will just have to delete them.  No one will improve them.  But I strongly advise you ''not'' to delete them.  They aren't doing any harm, and no one reads them (except me :-).  An encyclopedia is not judged by how esoteric its most esoteric articles are, but by how well its mainstream articles are written, and how well those mainstream articles cover the field.  I think the mainstream math articles at Conservapedia, like integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers, are pretty good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which brings me to my specific point.  It isn't true that no one edits math articles any more.  There was a small amount of activity on integers and natural numbers recently.  Perhaps this is what led you to write the essay.  I don't think there was anything over-the-top about the recent edits, and I think you sometimes over-react to things like this.  I believe that the recent edits in that area were well-intentioned, and trying to do a good job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving a really good definition of the integers or natural numbers, in the way that you and I would like, at the appropriate level but with real clarity, is ''impossible''.  Saying &amp;quot;evenly divisible by 1&amp;quot; doesn't work, because the reader who doesn't know what an integer is will have no conception of what division is or what &amp;quot;evenly divisible&amp;quot; means.  Saying &amp;quot;has no fractional part&amp;quot; doesn't work either.  I can see what the author intended--numbers are things like &amp;quot;3.7&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;.7&amp;quot; is the fractional part.  So, having no fractional part means it is something like just 3.  That's correct, but it relies on having an intuitive notion of real numbers, that is, things like 3 and 3.1 and 3.7 and 3.14159....  (Speaking of which, happy pi day!!!)  Now most people have an intuitive feel for numbers with fractions well before they have to think about a formal definition of natural numbers.  I know I did.  That is, I knew about &amp;quot;3&amp;quot; in the context of &amp;quot;3.7 without the .7&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;the biggest markings on a ruler, rather than all the small ones.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how do you write the article?  You do the best you can, giving an imprecise defintion in terms of &amp;quot;numbers that you count with&amp;quot;, or something like that.  (By the way, I really really liked your &amp;quot;mathisfun&amp;quot; web link explaining these things on an elementary level, and I used it (crediting you) in my article at Ameriwiki.)  So the right thing is probably to define &amp;quot;counting numbers&amp;quot;, as in the web link, and accepting that that's the best you can do.  Then address, very lightly, the issue of how that might be different from &amp;quot;natural numbers&amp;quot;, and whether zero is included, and so on.  It's not worth making a big deal about.  Just pick some definitions, and stick to them.  Mention that maybe not everyone agrees.  Don't worry about students getting a bad grade on an exam because of a nit-picking difference--people taking exams will presumably have attended a class and gotten the instructor's view on this, if the instructor thinks it's important.  The way you addressed the issue in the natural number article is just right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, the stuff about integers being &amp;quot;the only integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered and in which order is preserved by addition&amp;quot; is over the top.  Either take it out or move it to the very bottom.  Other than that, I think the natural number / integer articles are in pretty good shape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more thing:  Don't be put off by the fancy &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; symbol.  The people are not trying to show off.  The symbols are cool, and the students will think so.  When I was in junior high, I thought that the summation and integral symbols were really cool, long before I knew what they meant.  Let the students see them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I still say that the Peano axioms would be a good thing to have at Conservapedia.  Nowhere near as complicated as &amp;quot;integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered&amp;quot;, and really interesting for the target audience.  You may copy my Peano article from Ameriwiki if you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:34, 14 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just wanted to add my thoughts as a math graduate student who has made several edits to our math articles.  As someone who plans on becoming a professor, I think it is fundamental that, as an educational resource, Conservapedia has accessible (to the extent possible) math material.  However, we are not limited in space like a print encyclopedia, so there is certainly room for us to have more in-depth coverage of math topics for more advanced scholars.  It's not my intention to make Conservapedia unusable as an educational resource; if you think that my edits are not helpful, please feel free to discuss them with me.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:20, 15 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You may have missed my point, which is that 99% of our readers are concerned with math that is below the college level. I want the majority of our editorial effort in math to focus on what these readers need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 17 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed:  I take exception to your implication that I &amp;quot;missed your point&amp;quot; about the intended audience of CP, or how to write for it.  Be assured that I absolutely, totally, utterly, and completely understand these issues.  If you have any question about this, please see my articles on [[Limit (mathematics)]], [[Algebra]], [[Compass and straightedge]], and [[Cramer's rule]].  ''These are all topics that I studied in high school'', and I'm sure you did too.  In particular, I put an enormous amount of work into the limit article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, this stuff is entirely in your hands now.  If you have any problems with the math articles, you have the administrative power to delete any articles that you think are inappropriate, like the [[Kolmogorov space]] article.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:57, 4 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, thanks, brother wolf, for exposing your neck so meekly. But I have no desire to be top dog, if you'll excuse me for mixing metaphors. I'm glad you understand and work hard, and I hope you will help me make high school math (and below) accessible to the average reader - not just those in the top 1% like you and me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:47, 5 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must confess that I don't understand your metaphors very much -- brother wolf? exposing my neck?  I'm pretty clueless about contemporary culture.  But I know what &amp;quot;top dog&amp;quot; means.  There's no doubt that you are a top dog, being an administrator.  Also, I'm flattered to be considered in the top 1%, but, remember, there have been a lot of really sharp people here.  So I'm not sure about being in the top 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, good luck, and have fun.  And don't hesitate to delete stuff that you consider inappropriate.  Really.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll come by and look around and say hello from time to time.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:50, 11 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carbon Dioxide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have redone Brenden's edits in a number of different edits. I hope this helps you. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 07:01, 10 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It did. See my subsequent edits. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:23, 12 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Understanding Islam ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for this entry: [[Islam and tolerance]]. I followed the reference link to the news story &amp;quot;The Roots of Muslim rage&amp;quot;, and read the article. I thought it was really interesting, and as I am trying to better understand their beliefs and attitude towards us, (those of Christian faith and in Western Nations) I wanted you to know this was helpful to me, thanks. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:36, 15 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I put the article up for deletion; please contest me on it's talk page. Thanks, [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:29, 5 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I remember posting this thank-you to Ed Poor almost 3 months ago for making the page, as he referenced a very interesting article in the footnotes that helped me to better understand the position of Muslims. I had been trying to gain a better understanding of their point of view, and I found it very helpful. I'm surprised to see it up for deletion, since I don't think &amp;quot;one quote&amp;quot; pages are undesirable, as they often lead me to think more about a subject matter. Sometimes a little quote can lead to learning more about a subject. Why not add a little more information rather than try to delete the page? [[User:Taj|Taj]] 14:32, 6 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of your newer articles need some categories. I don't really know much about subject matter so would probably be better if you do it. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:03, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Feel free to place any category at all, when I'm too rushed to do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:18, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Normally I would, just not to familiar with some of subject matter. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:22, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Christian Chivalry==&lt;br /&gt;
I redirected your article on [[Christian chivalry]] to the already existing page [[Chivalry]] since they're the same concept and the other page was already much more in-depth. Hope that was alright. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:20, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did you complete the merge before reducing the page to a redirect? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:16, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not an admin, I don't think I can do a full merge like that... I figured since it was just a sentence and the sentiment of that sentence was already covered in the other article that the redirect would be sufficient... sorry. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 22:26, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you did your best in good faith, then no apology is needed. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll take a look later on, and if I think that quote is relevant I'll tack it on to [[Chivalry]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:28, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Talk:Gun control#New Infographic]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As you are one of the main contributors to the [[Gun control]] page, I'm writing here to ask you to follow the link I posted in the heading of this section and read the data I found. I think it could be very helpful to the article, but as I said there I'm far from an expert in interpreting that kind of data. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm interested in describing both sides in the [[Firearms debate]]. I don't think we have to overemphasize one side. Put in anything you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==fnarrow's reply to your terms==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just copy and pasting what he sent me, please don't shoot the messenger. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]], I agree to your terms unequivocally and will do everything I can on the future to not allow my emotions to get the better of me in the future. That said, I just want to take a second to point out that 2 of the 6 examples you gave of my behavior, (4 and 5 I believe, i do not have the other page open as I type this email) were not posted by me but were part of a comment posted by another user in response to my comments. The other 4 I do not deny and I agree that they were out of line. To that end, I would like to point out that if you or [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] look at the final interaction between myself and [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] in the &amp;quot;why complaints will go nowhere&amp;quot; section of that same page, you will see that we had settled our differences peacefully. It wasn't until after that that i was banned for earlier statements made in the heat of the moment and out of exasperation regarding the situation at the time they were made. I do not contest the justice of the 1 day block, but when it was immediately followed by the infinite block before I had a chance to respond, apologize or anything else, that was when I felt I had been treated unfairly and asked my friend to join the site as a conduit for contact. (thanks again John!) While I therefore still think the infinite block was unwarranted, i do apologize for my actions and will not allow it to happen again. Thanks for your time and i look forward to helping the site grow from this point forward. --fnarrow&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; btw, I'm not 100# sure what a &amp;quot;sock&amp;quot; is, assure you that to my understanding of the term I am not one. I have neither the time nor the inclination to edit your wiki and only made this account at my friend's request since he had no other contact anyone here. [[User:JSandler|JSandler]] 22:35, 28 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Karajou said I could unblock Fnarrow. I hope this turns out okay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:29, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fnarrow ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you be able to restore Fnarrows user and talk page whilst your at it mate ? [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:30, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:(this is [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]], I'm using [[User:JSandler|John(jsandler)'s]] phone at the moment as my IP is still blocked even though my user page shows that I have been unblocked by [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]]... Can that be fixed?) I wanted to thank everyone for helping me understand what happened and helping me get reinstated. I look forward to working with you all more in the future. Also, as [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] already posted, is it possible to have my user page and talk page content restored? Most of it can be deleted now that issues have been settled, but I'd like to recover other parts. Thanks again, [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]] 14:00, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ed, yes I can post again, I had assumed you had unblocked me... but I guess not based upon your comment on my talk page. Anyway, can you restore the content which was deleted from my user page and talk page? I don't know how to do that... Also, since you're a very knowledgeable Conservative and I consider myself to be a fairly knowledgeable Libertarian I'd be willing to work with you on the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page you created if you're still looking for someone to help with that project. Let me know. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 00:12, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked your username. Someone else seems to have unblocked your IP address; I don't know how to do that.&lt;br /&gt;
I'll leave your user and talk pages as C left them - ask him if he wants them undeleted. I'm just unblocking you, in light of your promise to chill out and be more focused on articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please start the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page, and I'll join in. Thanks! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:41, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we can do that although I am not good with wikis. From what i Understand, Libertarians are conservative when it comes to economics, gun ownership, small government, defence etc but are closer to liberals on other social issues. The way I understand it, libertarians believe the law should protect person and property, but go no further than that. I will do some research in the next few days, write a beta copy and forward to you for review/editing if thats ok&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Excellent, Patmac. I'll add that to the article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:22, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Homosexuality article and General protection idea/proposal  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[homosexuality]] article seems to be a bit broken. The table of contents is in the wrong position. Could you or another sysop please fix this ? Also I had an Idea re article protection. Would it be possible to protect some article so that only those users with '''edit''' and '''sysop''' rights edit them. This would allow those pages to be edited and improved by trusted and known users whilst stopping liberal trolls and thugs pushing their POV and vandalizing them. I think that something like this would help improve the quality and accuracy of the encyclopedia as it would allow for updates, improvements, tweaks and general formatting improvements to be made to our most popular articles [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:45, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For questions about rights (which involve software tweaks), talk to Andy. I can always unprotect an article at least temporarily. But if you want a longterm solution, I'm the wrong man to ask. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Odysseus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You should highlight quotes by including them in apostrophes: see [[Help:How to Code]] for a simple introduction - and follow [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052312&amp;amp;oldid=1052300 this link] for an example.&lt;br /&gt;
*If you include a link to a source just by using simple square brackets (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/odysseus.htm]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), it appears only as a number (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) in the text, similar to footnotes. But unlike those, it isn't listed in the references. To get it listed there, you have to include your link into &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; - tags. (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052314&amp;amp;oldid=1052313 this link] for an example)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 04:31, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps either AugustO or Ed Poor can help me, but other than on recent wikis where the quotation mark and the italic notation can be easily confused, I have never seen italic font used as a stand-alone indication of a block quotation.  I have seen italic used for titles of books or for emphasis or for foreign language words, but not as a replacement for quotation marks.  Any sources for this alternative would be appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 10:56, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:A very good question! Conservapedia states in its [[Conservapedia:Formatting conventions]]:&lt;br /&gt;
::''Italic sections of text are usually used to portion off a portion of text, indicating it is integral to the sentence without being part of its continuation. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:But while wikipedia don't like when you put quotes in italics &lt;br /&gt;
::''For quotations, use only quotation marks (for short quotations) or block quoting (for long ones), not italics. (See Quotations below.) This means that (1) a quotation is not italicized inside quotation marks or a block quote just because it is a quotation, and (2) italics are no substitute for proper quotation formatting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia doesn't address the matters (as far as I could see). Instead, Conservapedia offer some templates which try to do the job.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote}} or {{Q}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This template expects an author, so it can't be used in our special case:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Note how the text gets italicized, and is included in quotation marks: but this template is only used eleven times on this wiki. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote box}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quote box|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox2}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox2|quote=the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|source=John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:''QuoteBox2'' is used ten times on Conservapedia, ''Quotebox'' 422 times, ''Quote box'' only 1 time. Clearly they aren't very popular.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the most popular version, used over 1500 times. &lt;br /&gt;
:My conclusion: &lt;br /&gt;
:#The main feature of a quotation are - surprise, surprise - the quotation marks. Especially for short quotes, they shouldn't be omitted. I haven't used them regularly in the past (see the first quotations in this section), but I'll do so henceforth.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Conservapedia is mute on the use of italics to mark a quote. But perhaps we should follow wikipedia's lead and just don't do so&lt;br /&gt;
:#Indenting via ::: alone is not enough to mark a section as a long quote, at least &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; .. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; should be used - this indents the quote from the left and the right margin. A longer quotation should use one of the templates - best probably &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:Any thoughts? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:50, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My thought is that the last time we discussed a formatting issue, I tried to throw my weight around, and it didn't end on a cheerful note. So why don't I just follow whatever you recommend? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:24, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you.  I just want to say that I have never, ever thought of italics as conveying the limits of a quotation.  I always assumed that someone had put a printout of wiki-marked up text into an OCR scanner and it just got confused between double apostrophes and a quote mark.  I agree with your bottom line. Thanks [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 21:40, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neutral third party's viewpoint sought ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed.  I'd like to get your views on the discussion between another user and me that took place on my talk page.  It looks as if you recently blocked him over another matter.  I think he just tried to bully me for no good reason, but I'd like to hear what a senior admin thinks.  Thanks for weighing in if you get the chance.  [[User:DanAP|DanAP]] 00:14, 18 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I believe RontheDon and Bamorris9 are parodists--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 11:52, 20 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Propositional calculus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started that article.  It's a topic that you have, on several occasions (remember the &amp;quot;wff N proof&amp;quot; game?) expressed an interest in.  I urge you to fill it out.  Though I have a degree in mathematics, I do not know how to explain this topic at a high-school level, and I do not write about topics that I can't explain at a high-school level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also notice no activity on any &amp;quot;sciency&amp;quot; (STEM?) stuff over the last few months, from you or anyone else.  Have you lost interest?  I hope not.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 21:00, 1 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Susan Rice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please help me to expand the article [[Susan E. Rice]]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:29, 6 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I dont know how to put in a Officeholder-template. Can you please do it. Here are all informations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rice --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:32, 11 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edward Snowden ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should read [[Edward Snowden]]. That was my mistake. I might even have heard someone else mispronounce that.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:04, 12 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lukashenko ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please uploud this picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpeg ? Thanks--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 09:18, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For the [[Belarus]] article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No for the [[Alexander Lukashenko]]-article please.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:50, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess you mean [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_%28%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0%29.jpeg this picture.] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:yes and please uploud a picture of [[Nicolas Maduro]]. Like [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Canciller_de_Venezuela_y_Ofrenda_Floral_a_Bol%C3%ADvar_%284%29.jpg this] here--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:25, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:55, 3 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==RE:Categories==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're welcome! - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 12:09, 17 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flags and Coat of Arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud the flags and the coat of arms of the following countries: [[Guinea-Bissau]], [[Republic of China]], [[Benin]], [[Saint Lucia]], [[Saint Vincent and the Grenadines]], [[Ireland]] and [[Fiji]]. I already asked Karajou but he did´nt answered.--07:59, 21 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please uploud them.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:42, 28 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== quick reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a quick reminder. Please put category tags on your new articles. I would also try to have internal links to them from related articles (within articles or the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:04, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Your [[John Mighton]] and [[Learning styles]] articles need category tags and so do some of your most recent articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:11, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I will try to help out and add categories to a few pages in case Dr. Poor is too busy to do this immediately; he can always change the categories if he feels they don't fit. Thanks! [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:35, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservative, you are correct; thanks, Taj, for quickly filling the gap! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:19, 5 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read your article [[Ten year rule]] and it served as further impetus for me to see if this rule of thumb could be shortened via various techniques such as more rapid skill acquisition, improved memorization skills (mnemonics), increasing reading comprehension, time management skills, etc.  I found some additional interesting material on this matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as skill acquisition, a Christian I know came to the United States from Africa and became fluent in English though total immersion in English. He refused to speak his native tongue with his fellow countryman on campus. It worked. He obtained college level English skills within 3 months. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:17, 31 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Completing the square==&lt;br /&gt;
You might want to take a look at that article, and weigh in on whether it is &amp;quot;jargon&amp;quot; or otherwise pitched at an inappropriate level.  Perhaps I should have checked with you ''before'' going off the deep end.  I know that you share my interest in making the math articles accessible to the expected audience.  I believe that the topic of solving quadratic equations, and the quadratic formula, and the derivation of same by &amp;quot;completing the square&amp;quot;, are completely appropriate.  I also believe that the article covers this topic in a completely straightforward way.  (If they had used Hilbert spaces to prove the quadratic formula, that would have been a different matter!)  Anyway, feel free to put the jargon tag back if you think it should be there.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:20, 8 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't have to check with me before writing anything, and thanks for telling me about changes to [[Completing the square]]. I'm always interested in the reading level of articles, as well as any prerequisites a reader must have. The main point is not to be able to say, &amp;quot;All the information is complete and correct.&amp;quot; Rather, it is for the readers to leave here having learned or understood something which is important to them. In other words, it's not about us (&amp;quot;getting graded&amp;quot;) but about them (&amp;quot;getting edified&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:32, 9 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:See &lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic equations]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic formula]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[completing the square]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Hilbert spaces]] - way beyond [[high school math]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Jargon]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Accessibility of math articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikimedia Commons==&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud these images:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/78/Machno.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Rosa_Luxemburg.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Nicolas_Maduro_Moros.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:12, 16 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you please uploud these images also:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/Hassan_Rouhani_2.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:03, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You forgot this one: [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:12, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can you find one with an English title, instead of Russian letters? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:40, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure: [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:28, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:24, 22 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Here are the links again: '''[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG] [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]''' --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 12:15, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=upload&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1 upload log] and tell me which ones you still need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The links that I have posted over you.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:07, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Black man from Brooklyn.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not recall Conservapedia putting the race of the Sandy Hook, Aurora, or Sikh temple shooters on the front page of the website. Why do so this time? [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 12:06, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you think it's not relevant? There's been a lot of [[black on white]] crime lately. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think his blackness is as relevant as the whiteness of the majority of the spree killers in this country. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 22:15, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just went into one of your recent two sentence articles and it didn't have periods after the sentences. If you don't want to put in the effort to write an informative article and can't be bothered to even put periods after your sentences, then please consider not creating any more articles.  Andy just deleted one of our articles that was merely a quote. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe you are capable of writing good articles, but you are choosing to just slap &amp;quot;articles&amp;quot; together instead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are putting category tags on them now so you are taking some additional effort. But you need to put more effort in them if you are going to create them. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:50, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, how about [[Momentum]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:32, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== My response ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for my ill-tempered tone earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, this is what I would suggest and I will explain why below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Use this free tool to make it easy to create 400+ word articles: http://www.wordcounttool.com/ Your article was about 150 words long. This website is competing against other articles for people's attention and so keeping this standard will help this website better compete. Also, if you look at the search engine results, you will generally see the search results are at least 400 words long in length.  For example, see the search results for the word momentum here: [https://www.google.com/search?q=momentum&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high Search results for the word momentum]  and [http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=momentum&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;fr=moz35 More search results for the word momentum]. The articles are significantly over 150 words long. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People want longer articles that are at least 400 words. The search engines know this. That is why these type of articles are in the search engine results. So instead of creating three 150 word articles, write one article that is about 400 words or more. If a wiki has more search engine results, more traffic will be generated. If more traffic is generated, then more people will tend to sign up as editors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try to write articles that show up first in the search engines. Endeavor to do your best when writing an article. The Apostle Paul said, &amp;quot;Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but {only} one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.&amp;quot; (1 Corinthians 9:24).   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. If you use a quote, always cite it as students want a resource they can readily use and their teachers expect them to cite their sources for quotes. Here is a good format to use as it clearly shows the quotations around the quote plus cites the source of the quote: http://www.conservapedia.com/Socialism#Obama_administration_and_land_ownership&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for not responding in anger to my talk page post. I was planning to erase it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:34, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, put an attractive picture on your articles if possible. [[Flipperpithecus|This article]] ranks #1 at a popular search engine for a term as can be seen [https://www.google.com/search?q=flipperpithecus&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high HERE].  It features an attractive picture. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:11, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please review this block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been meaning to write to you about the block of EddyJ, but, first, something else has come up.  I believe that the recent block of DanAP is completely wrong.  He wrote a note [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Depression&amp;amp;diff=1068305&amp;amp;oldid=1068242 here], praising your work over the last six years, and was blocked for it.  I believe his note was sincere (and I happen to agree with it, by the way.)  Please do something about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the main issue is EddyJ.  He has been infinitely blocked, with the note &amp;quot;Ask Ed Poor before reinstating this person.&amp;quot;  I'm baffled by that note.  As you may know, I do extensive research of the people at Conservapedia; their interests; their viewpoints; their editing styles; and what kinds of fights they get into.  He has had some interactions with you, but nothing that would suggest that you have some special interest in his block.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He seems to be something of a hard-luck person in terms of being blocked.  He got blocked by you, by accident, which you retracted and apologized for 2 minutes later.  He got blocked 4 times by Markman, who was a vile character.  (I exchanged some email with Markman after his banishment from CP and RW; he's even more vile than you may realize.)  These blocks were clearly just Markman being destructive, and one was overturned by Andy.  Anyway, his relationship with you seems to be &amp;quot;interesting&amp;quot; but respectful.  (Rather like my relationship with you, or with Daniel Pulido&amp;amp;mdash;a very interesting person.)  His only fight with you was over the &amp;quot;Black man&amp;quot; issue, which I don't consider to have been very serious as fights go.  So please review his case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:06, 16 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Have him submit a [[writing plan]], and I'll discuss the matter with Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:36, 18 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me to expand the article [[Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst]] and dont forget the photos.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 14:07, 20 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== speedy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please look at the [[:Category:Speedy deletion candidates]] and delete some articles there.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 03:26, 16 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beethoven==&lt;br /&gt;
One finds wonderful things in unexpected places.  I happened to see your edit to the Beethoven article, with the reference to the BBC video series.  I've downloaded it.  3 parts.  It's wonderful!  You might also want to look at a similar 3-part series, also by Charles Hazelwood, about Mozart.  Both series are in three parts.  Go to the first one in each case, and you will see links to the other two.  I'd suggest putting all 3 links in the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections of the Beethoven and Mozart pages.  The first Mozart article is at [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrXpzOFknN0]; the other two are linked from there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, I'm not a great fan of putting in seemingly disconnected quotes, and I know other people have criticized you for the same thing.  I'd suggest saying something as a subsection of the line for the 9th, like &amp;quot;One commentator has said the Beethoven's ninth symphony &amp;quot;remains as potent, obsessive, and bewilderingly brilliant as ever&amp;quot;, giving the BBC link.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:21, 29 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5 maintenance tasks that need to be done - some of which could be automated - perhaps you could help as far as the automation of the tasks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some editors like to do wiki maintenance tasks. I started on two of these maintenance task, but I don't have the time to do it all myself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 maintenance task that need to be done: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1.''' De-orphan pages which have no category tags or links to them from other pages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2.''' Remove about 8% of the wiki pages which are ex-editors' user pages and user talk pages who have not edited in the last 3 years.''' And this task could probably be automated, but it could be done manually too.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a list of editors/users here: http://conservapedia.com/Special:ListUsers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you go through the list and put delete page tags on the user pages and user talk pages of users who have been inactive for 3 years, then those pages can be deleted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can also find the pages that need to be deleted by looking at the pages that have these templates on them and then see if the users have been active in the last 3 years: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AUseful+links and http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AWelcome  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3.''' Delete the templates that are never being used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4.''' Build up the 2 sentence stub articles so they have at least 500 words.  Using the random page search function, I estimate the stub articles are at least 30-40% of the wiki articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5.''' Within 10 years, about 50% of links become broken links. Xenu's Link Sleuth can crawl your website and find these dead links plus make a report: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, using this Firefox tool https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/linkchecker/ or this chrome tool https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/link-checker/aibjbgmpmnidnmagaefhmcjhadpffaoi?hl=en these dead links can be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did this link maintenance already for the atheism, evolution and homosexuality articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think these 5 maintenance tasks being done would enhance the user experience for the readers plus these are maintenance tasks that need to be done. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:37, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Automating some of these tasks ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mentioned Xenu's Link Sleuth above in order to help automate spotting the dead links. I think that deleting the the inactive editors who have not edited for 3 years could be automated as well. Maybe using something like [[User:EdBot]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:36, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I was teach math and English   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Master Yoda, welcome back you are! ;-) --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:18, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Call myself senior, I would not! :-) [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:53, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Great to see you again here, Ed!  I look forward to learning more from your edits.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:12, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Can you Help? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed. It's good to see you back. I have been wanting to join the [[Creationwiki]] and [[Citizendium]] encyclopedia projects. I recognized your name on both sites. Last year I asked on your talk page but you were away at the time. Now that you are back, can you tell me how can I get an account for [[Citizendium]]? There is a [[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:RequestAccount| forum for registering]] but they are testing it, and I do not want to give away my info without receiving my account. So, how can I request an account where I will be assured of receiving it? And, how do I get a [[Creationwiki]] account? I requested once, but I got no confirmation email either in my inbox or spam folder. It appears that Hotmail has problems. I don't think I will be requesting either at present, but when I am ready, how can I request without having to wait? [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I would like to tell you that I will still edit Conservapedia even after I join the above sites. I just will edit them in addition. I originally edited [[Wikipedia]], but I have left because I could not agree with the viewpoints there. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, I don't know anything about that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:10, 16 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== small request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, could you please put category tags on your new articles. For example, this article [[Rudd Weatherwax]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:26, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Category tags, got it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::re Category:Animal trainers, Category:Dog trainers, Category:American male film actors: [[Conservapedia:Editing_article_and_talk_pages#Categories|Unlike articles, categories are to be in title case (e.g. Australian Cities and Towns, not Australian cities and towns), and are to be plural where applicable.]] --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The recursion joke ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was used in Donald Knuth's ''The Art of Computer Programming'' in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And hello again!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to keep the math and science stuff from going off the deep end over the last couple of years.  Not really hard; you and I seem to have scared off the flamers pretty well.  But something came up very recently, that you might want to look at.  See the quadrupole stuff in [[Gravitational waves]].  It's beyond me, and I'm way too busy fighting lower-level battles at present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:24, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, Sam, I'm going to stick to the K-12 curriculum. That's what I know best. But it's great to be back! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Internet Explorer]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed. Years ago you had the article on [[Internet Explorer]] removed due to its poor sourcing, or, I am not sure what, but it is still on the talkpage. I have recreated the article with a screenshot at the side. I have posted this message to ask if you would like to help in developing the article. I am not very good at finding sources or researching, although I do what I can. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 23:01, 24 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet_Explorer&amp;amp;direction=prev&amp;amp;oldid=903283 this version] doesn't seem so bad - after 4 or 5 years. Do as you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:58, 28 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you. I have restored to that version, but retained the screenshot and the category of Internet. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 19:44, 29 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bots==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello!  As I mentioned on [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Bots_.28and_other_web_services_and_resources.29|Mr. Schlafly's talk page]], I was wondering about the possibility of trying to help CP by running a bot.  I have a limited understanding of PHP and this kind of bot, but am fairly tech savvy and have created and used other sorts of bots on occasion.  [[User:JDano|JDano]] mentioned that you are the only person of CP who has successfully set up a bot, so I just thought I would ask you what you think.  It seems to me this would be a nice thing to do, but I'm not exactly sure how to proceed.  I'm also unsure of whether Mr. Schlafly would approve of me trying this, and whether it would even work, or if this wouldn't work with the permissions level I have here.  I have a stable web server and a slightly less stable private server.  Any thoughts?  Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 15:23, 12 April 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you haven't disappeared, I might point out that my bot only worked with a previous version of MediaWiki. Let me know if you're still interested. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:44, 19 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm still here, and thanks for getting back to me!  I am also still interested, though I'm uncertain if:&lt;br /&gt;
#I am able to do this&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If I'm allowed to run a bot, since I'm not an admin&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If bots are even allowed on CP--someone thought they were altogether disallowed.&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If there is a sufficient need to a for for me to bother (and also bother others, like you)&lt;br /&gt;
::That is annoying that your bot isn't compatible with the update, but is there a way to take your basic code and put it into a new &amp;quot;adaption&amp;quot; framework?  As far as my own attempt, I'm finding a number of off-the-shelf &amp;quot;bots&amp;quot; which are freely available, but pre-configured for Wikipedia.  I don't know if they could be used or not, but it might be an option. Do you have any other thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 00:16, 20 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since my last post, I have gotten a few answers to my questions.  I also now have a working [[User:DavidB4-bot|batch edit bot]].  It has a lot of limitations and a few bugs, but it's a start.  I would like it if one of use could get a sort of vandalism reduction/reversion bot working, as you previously had.  I in no way want to steal the task from you, but if you can't get something like this working, I would appreciate some guidance as to what previously worked and how it failed.  In any case, I would very much like an improved edit bot, as what I have now is a simple, static cue of batch tasks to execute, either once or recursively. This is proving useful, but not as useful as I would like.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I deleted my user page, but still appears in the history. Please help me delete my pages at conservapedia.com and my conservapedia.com account. Please delete them.  (data-provider)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Merry Christmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Merry Christmas.gif|cebter|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merry Christmas!  And have a happy New Year's Day. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:49, 24 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Talmud and &amp;quot;taking things out of context&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I'm no anti-Semite. I may have my issues with the Talmud, but it strictly has to deal with how they treated God (not even Jesus, just God himself). And I would still fight to the death to protect Judaism and Israel itself especially from the likes of Islam, Stormfront, the KKK and the like. The types of Jews I do have immense respect for are the ones who adhere to the Torah only, or at least primarily.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second of all, surely you must have seen the parts in those quotes that specifically state where those quotes came from. And for the record, there were a few Jewish people who confirmed a lot of what was said in those quotes from the Talmud. Case in point: https://youtu.be/YSy6ENVAJlY And there was one person who converted to Christianity and testified what was in the Talmud. For example, Bernard Lazare, a French Jew who upon converting testified the Talmud's role in the Jewish revolts and also what actually was said in the Talmud.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third of all, I get enraged whenever someone claims I took something &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot;, and in fact am enraged with the phrase itself, because I only see it as an excuse to cover up bad things, like when people claim that Lenin took Marx &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot; when he did those evil things even when those were exactly the stuff Marx demanded that Communism should be done in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I used to naively believe that the Talmud was part of God's design, that the Jews still worshipped God even if they don't worship Jesus himself, but they don't, they if anything make him more like a plaything, and that I will NOT tolerate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:14, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, try to get a handle on your rage and focus your efforts on improving articles. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:21, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not actually enraged, or at least, I'm keeping a pretty tight lid on my rage, so I am getting quite a bit of a handle on my rage actually. Didn't resort to name calling. Anyways, I reverted your edit, because, 1., those quotes have been verified by countless people, some of whom were Rabbis themselves, and 2., if you really wanted to address that bit, you should have responded to it directly, not removed it. I also added your reply back in, though I had to change it slightly since, due to the quotes still being there, it wouldn't make sense to mention you removed the quotes. And again, those quotes weren't taken out of context, as even Yossi Gurvitz and Bernard Lazare verified those quotes were accurate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:24, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest you get back to what we were doing before you supplied all those Talmud quotes. Wasn't it something to do with Trump and a so-called &amp;quot;[[Muslim registry]]&amp;quot;? I could use some help with that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine, I'll help with that, as long as you stop taking those quotes out. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:28, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can appeal your block to Andy, Conservative, or any other admin. But issuing ultimatums and refusing alternatives is not a part of collaborative editing. Bye! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't making an ultimatum, nor was I refusing alternatives (if anything, I actually DID try to compromise by letting you retain your response while still keeping the quotes). Ironically, I WAS about to make a contribution to the Muslim Registry article when you blocked me. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 16:58, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sigh. You're right. I guess I was too hasty: no one else at Conservapedia whose opinion I value agreed with your block!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Forgive me? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009.  It is now registered and somewhat set up.  I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel.  Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering.  In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later.  If you are interested, please let me know!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:46, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you could implement this project, that would be excellent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable?  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The blue links on a dark red background is hard to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sorry for the late reply - I haven't been checking CP every day. Here is how to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 turn off] the background on the useful links, and here is how I [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 made the background light yellow]. Hope it helps. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:56, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, some people have started to edit Conservapedia and then quickly gave up because they didn't know how to edit a wiki.  I noted about 3 people who did this. There are probably many more who quit but didn't say anything. I added a link entitled &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot;.  But I believe there are various versions of the welcome template so my link is not on all welcome template versions. For example, the welcome template that JPatt uses didn't incorporate my &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot; link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the newest version of the Wikimedia software allow for WYSIWYG editing? In other words &amp;quot;What you see is what you get&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The newest version of the Wikimedia software does not have the counter at the bottom of the pages. I understand why Andy Schlafly likes the counters at the bottom. I like the counters too. I guess there might be an extension to add the counters to the newest version of Wikimedia. But after all is said and done, having WYSIWYG editing could greatly increase the participation rate at this wiki and lower the rate of people falling out because they don't know how to edit a wiki. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:40, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==== Here is the welcome to Wikipedia and it is much better and legible ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Plate of cookies.jpg|thumb|300px|Some cookies to welcome you! [[File:Face-smile.svg|25px]]]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]], Conservative! I am [[User:This lousy T-shirt|This lousy T-shirt]] and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Knox490|your contributions]]. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], or feel free to leave me a message on [[User talk:This lousy T-shirt|my talk page]] or type ''{{tl|helpme}}'' at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message!  I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Help:Contents|Help pages]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Article development|How to write a great article]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ten_Simple_Rules_for_Editing_Wikipedia Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia].&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Also, when you post on [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] you should [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] using four tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.  Again, welcome!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Conservapedia needs a better greeting. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:02, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks Ed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:05, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:37, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Done, but you've been around long enough. Why don't you ask Andy for blocking rights? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:39, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm confident he would use block right appropriately, but Andy might be hesitant to give the privilege to Sam.  Sam has been in a number of disputes, and has been banned a few times as well.  I'd support Sam getting the privilege, (I'd say he's more than earned it since I've been here alone, nevermind all the time before that) but I don't know if it could happen. Besides, aren't privileges generally given, not requested? --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:09, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::David, you have hit the nail right on the head.  Blocking rights are given, not requested.  And my long career here is full of blocks (19 of them), including blocks by people who were later revealed to be vandals or parodists:  DanielPulido and the notorious Markman.  And illicit blocks by &amp;quot;assistants&amp;quot; over content disputes.  (I seem to have a knack for upsetting bullies.)  And several blocks by my friend Conservative; we get along much better now.  And two by Ed Poor himself; I think we get along much better now; I won't bore you with the details.  When you've been around as long as I have, you develop a history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no interest in getting any special powers.  I like to think of myself as a &amp;quot;conscientious objector&amp;quot; in these wars.  People know that if they wrongly block me, I can't and won't fight back.  But others will (hopefully) undo the damage.  I think a lot of people respect me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But when big vandal attacks come along, and I can't get anyone else to take action, that's when I wish I had block powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you for your kind words.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::SamHB, you brought those blocks (none of which were &amp;quot;illicit&amp;quot; like you claim) down on yourself for the exact reasons DavidB4 pointed out, as well as for repeatedly and insistently putting liberal POV into some articles (including even now, with the [[fake news]] article two days ago) and for provoking fights (also including now). If you didn't insist on trying to turn Conservapedia into Liberalpedia, you wouldn't get chastized by the admins as much as you do. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It's true that I've had a hair-trigger for blocks, but you might not know that I often agonize over these and consult Andy by private email afterwards. It's not easy to admit that I've overstepped, but my record shows that I have SOMETIMES unblocked someone after a few moments (or days?) of reflection. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:31, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unrelated to what's above, Ed Poor, I see that several of your recent blocks have been indefinite. I used to do this a lot, but I no longer do because it can cause many innocent people to lose access to CP. Oftentimes, IP addresses get shifted around, so different, unrelated people end up using the same address at different times. That means that one indefinite block could affect many people over time. Also, vandals don't tend to be the type of people in a perminent location, so it is unlikely they will be using the same IP address after some time even if the address is the same in the same location. I recommend five-year blocks instead with even shorter blocks necessary for less serious vandalism. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;amp;diff=1304184&amp;amp;oldid=1303142 DavidB4 explained it better on my talk page.] Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:40, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== WOTUS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is [[Waters of the United States rule]] and [[Clean Water Rule]] the same thing? If so, they should be merged. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:48, 1 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The articles should be merged, although the two rules are slightly different. Can you do it? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:38, 2 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are many rules implementing the Clean Water Act.  Shouldn't you just have one comprehensive article about the Clean Water Act?  Also, we should have a separate article about the definition of &amp;quot;Navigatable Waters of the United States&amp;quot;, because this term defines federal jurisdiction in contexts beyond just the Clean Water Act.  It also defines the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers and the  old Federal Power Commission (now  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) with respect to the licensing of hydroelectric projects. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 04:54, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no objection, as long as readers will be able to understand what each of those hot-button phrases means, politically:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Navigable waters of the United States]] has nothing to do with navigation or shipping. It's merely a compromise between polluters and farmers on the one hand, and clean-water freaks or preservationists on the other. &lt;br /&gt;
:::*Similarly, the [[Clean Water Rule]] is not mostly about clean drinking water for people, but it also restricts legitimate (farm) use and delights the [[no-use]] environmental lobby&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The [[WOTUS]] rule is a variation on the Clean Water Rule that isn't so tough on farmers filling in a swamp (see [[Wetlands]]) to get more crop land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you two can make one article out of all this mess, go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi Uncle Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I'm finally here. I would love to get in touch with you again. You are a wonderful person, always very friendly. --[[User:Annie Poor|Annie Poor]] ([[User talk:Annie Poor|talk]]) 13:10, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Great to see you! ==&lt;br /&gt;
Great to see you, Ed!  Hope all is well.  It's fantastic to see a longtime friend again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:42, September 20, 2022 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi dear Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God bless you Ed Poor.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RobS is actually againt this LT behavior. &lt;br /&gt;
It's LT who blames Jews for Hitler, not RobS.&lt;br /&gt;
This is about LT, he just pasted it all from his talk page on to here.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:38, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice quotes on leadership on your user page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked the quotes on leadership that are on your user page.  I copied them to this page:  [[User:Conservative/Quotes]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:56, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hooray!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
You made my day, Ed!!!  So good to see you again.  I have the good memory of attending a certain college speech with you and others perhaps a decade ago.  So glad you're still active!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:57, October 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Larry Sanger==&lt;br /&gt;
I note you have good things to say about [[Larry Sanger]] who has professed his belief in [[Christianity]] in recent years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]] made the assertion that Larry Sanger was an [[atheist]] (totally untrue) and either [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=2070366&amp;amp;oldid=1976745 condoned or was a practitioner of bestiality] which was repeated in [https://therightscoop.com/why-should-a-conservative-bother-using-wikipedia/ conservative media]. After Sanger's conversion from [[agnosticism]] to Christianity I cleaned up the Wikipedia page and at least a half dozen other pages User:Conservative copy pasted his [[spam]] into. But he steadfastly refuses to clean up at least 342 other pages with his assertions, nor change his editing habits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:21, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Two decades ago, Larry said he was an atheist, but I never held that against him, particularly because I was at the time an active member in the most unpopular new religion in America. Both he and Jimbo Wales supported me as a preeminent expositor of &amp;quot;neutrality&amp;quot;. If there is anything that needs to be cleaned up, post it here or email me at uncle_ed_poor@yahoo.com. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:29, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Woman pilot accused of being a DEI hire ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Re: Woman helicopter pilot accused of being a DEI hire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;According to research and data, there is no significant difference in piloting ability between women and men, meaning women pilots can be just as good as male pilots when considering skill and competence; studies have shown that when factors like experience are controlled for, accident rates between genders are largely comparable.&amp;quot;[https://www.google.com/search?q=are+women+pilots+as+good+as+men&amp;amp;oq=are+woman+pilots+as+goo&amp;amp;gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCAgBEAAYFhgeMgYIABBFGDkyCAgBEAAYFhgeMggIAhAAGBYYHjIICAMQABgWGB4yCAgEEAAYFhgeMg0IBRAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBhAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBxAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMgcICBAAGO8FMgYICRAuGEDSAQkxNDY5NGowajGoAgCwAgA&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But there is a long tradition of blaming women for calamity and incompetence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. &amp;quot;Women driver&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Adam blamed Eve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. I am waiting for FAA to give their ruling and I am not pre-judging matters. I haven't been following this news story closely. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this clarifies matters. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:53, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think the executive branch criticism was for her being a woman - but for being inexperienced, and pushed into a job to fill a DEI quota. I'll try to follow up on that. Anyway, the DEI controversy is a major part of the story. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:58, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I just saw a news report at: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmpkoJhqUP8 FAA Academy struggled to fill classes over DEI quotas: Sen. Mullin]. The claim is that at the time of one of the recent crashes, the air traffic control tower was understaffed. This news report indicated that when you have DEI what happens sometimes is that a significant portion of jobs become not filled because they are looking for a DEI hire with the requisite skills to do the job when there are non DEI applicants who could do the job and are not hired. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:11, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I think that is the Trump Administration argument. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:41, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Speaking of focusing on DEI over competency: &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The DNC Leader interrupted the party election to tell members that not enough non-binary candidates have been elected, so they MUST now vote for one.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/behizytweets/status/1885836927112552800 per this][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:46, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::From what I have heard so far, the planes usually come down a certain runway which I will call Runway A.  But the plane that was in the crash was coming down Runway B.  From what I understand, the pilot accidentally left out the information that the plane was coming down Runway B. On top of this, light pollution caused the helicopter pilot to probably not see the plane. And from what I understand, the air traffic tower was understaffed and that may have contributed to the air traffic controller mistake. On top of this, Trump is claiming that the helicopter was flying at an inappropriate altitude. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But like I said, I am not pre-judging things. I will reserve judgement until the FAA makes its ruling. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:51, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Telling, you might find this interesting: [[Prevalence of homosexuality going down in cultures that become more conservative]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:54, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* Guys, Remember this dreadful non answer by KBJ in Mar 2022?[https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2022/3/video-release-judge-jackson-cannot-define-woman-during-blackburn-scotus-day-two-hearing-remarks] [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])•&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Reagan National, ATC routinely asks pilots if they can land on the shorter runway (change from runway 1 to runway 33). Helicopter pilots SHOULD know this. If not, why not? Especially if they are TRAINING for a crucially important emergency flight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, they know (if they are bright enough to pound sand) that they will be crossing the flight path of landing airplanes. Wouldn't it make sense to be darn sure they aren't going to collide with any of them? (Not just the one that ATC &amp;quot;mentions&amp;quot;?) The best way to avoid a collision with another aircraft is to be NOT at the same altitude. Helicopters can fly safely between 50 and 200 feet off the ground, even at night.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
100% pilot error, Captain Rebecca Lobach, out of [[Davison Army Airfield]] in [[Fairfax County, Virginia]]. My condolences to your family. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:53, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Great to see you again, Ed! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, great to see you again, and thanks for your terrific edits!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:30, July 9, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sometimes it takes 5 or 10 minutes to get a page to load - I don't know if it's my wifi or what. That's the main reason I've been away so much. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:55, July 9, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::People are dying and [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#User:Conservative.27s_obsession_with_homosexuality User:Conservative with his homosexual obsession thinks it's a big joke.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ed: Should [[Conservapedia]] &amp;amp; Andy consider the following information as a vital [[foreign policy]] question in considering [[peace]] or [[war]], [[escalation]], and [[Ukraine aid]]?&lt;br /&gt;
===Using abductive reasoning, guestimate which Moscow, Russia drag queens are the most popular and list them by popularity===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most concise takeaway: Based on available reporting, the three most visible Moscow‑connected drag artists are Zaza Napoli, Lorina Rey, and Gena Marvin, with Zaza Napoli being the closest thing to a mainstream celebrity, Lorina Rey being the most prominent underground Moscow performer, and Gena Marvin being the most internationally recognized activist‑queen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is a structured abductive “best‑guess” ranking grounded in the search results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== '''🏆 Abductive popularity ranking (Moscow‑connected drag queens)''' ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ranking uses abductive reasoning: inferring “most likely popularity” from visibility, media coverage, cultural influence, and public reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== '''1. Zaza Napoli — Mainstream celebrity status''' ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A long‑established Moscow nightlife figure with TV credits, music releases, and high‑profile event hosting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Referred to as the “Queen of Russian Drag” in community events. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Performs internationally and maintains a broad entertainment presence beyond queer venues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This level of mainstream crossover strongly suggests the highest popularity among Moscow‑associated drag performers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== '''2. Lorina Rey — Most visible underground Moscow drag artist''' ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A pioneering Moscow‑based queen highlighted in international fashion media (Dazed). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Known for avant‑garde, boundary‑pushing drag and a strong online presence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Frequently cited as one of the most visible and outspoken figures in modern Russian drag.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Her prominence in Moscow’s queer scene suggests she is the most popular within the underground/club culture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== '''3. Gena Marvin — Internationally recognized activist‑queen''' ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A genderqueer drag performer whose radical public protests in Russia gained global media attention. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Has over 137k Instagram followers, indicating significant public reach.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although now in exile (Paris), her fame originates from Moscow‑centered activism and performances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
High international visibility places her third in Moscow‑connected popularity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== '''Why these three dominate the abductive ranking''' ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Media visibility:''' All three appear in major outlets (Dazed, PinkNews, Moscow Times).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Cultural impact:''' Each has shaped Russian drag in a distinct way—mainstream entertainment, underground artistry, political activism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Public reach:''' Zaza Napoli’s TV presence, Lorina Rey’s fashion‑media coverage, and Gena Marvin’s large social following provide measurable indicators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:24, July 10, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:LOL, drag queens just want publicity - best strategy is to ignore them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:23, July 12, 2026 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Worst_Liberal_Movies&amp;diff=2199051</id>
		<title>Essay:Worst Liberal Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Worst_Liberal_Movies&amp;diff=2199051"/>
		<updated>2026-07-10T04:06:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: WMDs in Iraq&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{See also|Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--If anyone is going to add ''Frozen'' to this list, do NOT assert that based on its supposedly imposing the [[homosexual agenda]]. John Nolte already confirmed on Breitbart that it does not do so in any way.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Trump-tweet-hollywood-and-hunt-movie (1).jpg|right|355px|President Trump voicing outrage towards Hollywood elites in response to the release of ''The Hunt'',  a film depicting conservatives being hunted by liberals for sport.]]&lt;br /&gt;
NOTE: We at ''Conservapedia'' do not care if a movie is considered a &amp;quot;classic&amp;quot;, or if is a famous movie for which many have nostalgia. If it has [[liberal bias]], then we call it out. Just because people love movies does not mean that [[Hollywood]] isn't trying to push a liberal agenda with them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While a good amount of [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies|great conservative films]] are produced every year, [[Hollywood values|Hollywood]] continues to produce, en masse, films that attempt to normalize and aggrandize immoral lifestyles and liberal bias. Below is a list of some of the more outrageous examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politically Liberal Live-Action Films==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The 5th Wave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The military consists of evil aliens in what was overall a failed franchise that couldn't get on the recent young adult book-to-film bandwagon.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34,912,982&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alien'' Franchise&lt;br /&gt;
|1979-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This pro-feminist, anti-capitalist film franchise was originated by [[atheist]] Ridley Scott. The first film was proven to be alarmingly similar to the 1965 film ''Planet of the Vampires'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzToy-Tjz5g&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but since it fitted the left's agenda, they didn't care and gave it biased reviews anyway. The second film, ''Aliens'', is an anti-Vietnam statement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T543J2L-gXU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and, just like its predecessor, copies another previous feature (in this case, the 1954 film ''Them!''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVoX-C9J4Zk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
|$515,930,723 (all together)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''All the Way''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|TV-14&lt;br /&gt;
|The 2016 HBO film based on the presidency of Democrat [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] is a good example of a historical revisionist film, palatable for liberals' regressive dominion of the media. Liberals seized the opportunity with the film to distort history in order to hold Johnson in high regard and also ignored many of the President's faults, including his racism, the War on Poverty and how it created a welfare state which, by design, destroyed untold numbers of African American families.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Assault on Wall Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Uwe Boll (often referred to as the worst director of this generation and known for his furious, vulgar, and spiteful responses to negative reception)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Uwe-Boll-considered-one-of-the-worst-film-directors-in-history&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BvLQb2uwW4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; makes one of the most historically inaccurate modern films that blames capitalism for the [[Recession of 2008|Great Recession]] and the downfall of the everyday man's life. The film plays out like an angry middle school boy's fan fiction revenge story, in which all the bankers are summarily executed (as in the [[Russian Revolution]]). Boll has said how &amp;quot;We need to ****ing kill the rich&amp;quot;, which only shows how uneducated he is.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQJwEAqzFs4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Apocalypse Now''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This overindulgent, anti-war diatribe portrays the American military as corrupt, incompetent [[drug addiction|drug-users]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$78,784,010&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battleship Potemkin''&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This silent Communist film heralds the Soviet Revolt on the Tsarist Russian battleship ''Potemkin''. When mutinying, the sailors murder a Christian chaplain aboard, which is shown as an act of &amp;quot;heroism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battle for Haditha'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film criticize American war against Islamic terrorism in Iraq and showing American soldiers as monsters.&lt;br /&gt;
|$245,521&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beauty and the Beast'' (2017 live-action remake)&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|On the one hand, the 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' is another victim in the film trend of needlessly and shamelessly remaking animated films or children's stories for the sake of earning easy revenue and capitalizing on current film trends in the modern, soulless Hollywood studio system. Liberals also seized the opportunity with the remake to exploit diversity and promote some liberal values within the ''Beauty and the Beast'' universe (to be noted that the story takes place in France in the 1700s, if not even before). The final result of the diversity inclusion in the cast of characters is that it feels self-congratulatory in the sense of putting it all in for the sake of having it, rather than having it be just a part of the story and the film. One notable example is the filmmakers' decision to make LeFou, Gaston's diminutive and bumbling sidekick, a homosexual who is conflicted with his feelings for Gaston (although it should be noted that in the actual script, it was never actually specified that LeFou was homosexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2017/03/03/josh-gad-lefou-beauty-and-the-beast/98679284/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This resulted in AFA's One Million Moms division responding to the change by calling for a boycott of the movie. At the end of the film, LeFou is shown taking a romantic interest in a musketeer who is now a transgender woman after being transformed into one during Gaston's siege of the Beast's castle. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not only is it an atrocious and needless artistic decision of the filmmakers to needlessly incorporate diversity simply for the sake of it, but the 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' also serves as an example that liberals can legitimately shoehorn the [[homosexual agenda]] into Disney films. Adding salt to the wound, the filmmakers also further changed history to suit their feminist agenda, similar to previous Disney films like ''Mulan'' (1998), ''Pocahontas'' (1995) and ''The Princess and the Frog'' (2009) (most infamously, the villagers are shown to be explicitly intolerant of Belle learning how to read and teaching girls to do the same, smashing her washing machine in the process, despite the fact that the namesake for the village in this film, Mdm. Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve, the original author for the fairy tale, was herself a woman). The 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' is now even more of a feminist propaganda film than the 1991 animated film version ever was. There were also hints at an anti-war message due to Gaston being turned into a war veteran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, there were also several surprisingly Conservative messages in the film, significantly more than in the 1991 version. Namely, Christianity is treated in a far more positive light in this film than in the 1991 version as one of the few friends Belle has in this version is the village Chaplain named Pere Robert who is shown to be sympathetic to her bibliophilic nature and also attempts to prevent Maurice from being sent to the Asylum, and later is shown to be horrified at the formation of the mob against the Beast (it is to be noted that in the original 1991 film, the character in question was merely a bookseller, not a priest, and most of the villagers, implied to be devout Christians, were demonized in the film), which was also surprisingly accurate to history despite the aforementioned changing of history in the film (in real history, Christianity, especially the Catholic Church, actively encouraged literacy, writing, and arithmetic among both genders, with girls being taught in convents or at the home). In addition, Maurice actually is shown to be more proactive in this film, such as directly refusing Gaston's attempt at marrying Belle and even attempting to expose Gaston as an attempted murderer and psychopath, and also plays a direct role in saving Belle and himself from the paddywagon after she exposes Beast to the villagers (in the original film, although he does set out to try and find Belle and save her after trying to get the villagers to help failed, he ultimately required saving by her due to catching an illness during his trek, and ultimately needed saving alongside Belle via Chip). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, Lumière as well as the featherduster (named Plumette in this version) are shown to be an actual loving couple (in the original film, this was just hinted, although Lumière seemed more of a womanizer and the featherduster sexually loose), and the remake also doesn't demonize traditional marriage (notably, the remake cut out Gaston's inappropriate wedding proposal as well as Belle shoving Gaston into mud in front of attendees). The forgiveness and redemption theme was also significantly more emphasized in the remake, due to Beast ultimately forgiving Maurice after learning why he had tried to steal the rose and even allowing Belle to save Maurice specifically to make up for his past behavior, with Maurice also forgiving Beast upon Belle showing him the baby rattle. It is also shown to be significantly more pro-family as well, as not only is Belle shown to be loyal to her father like in the 1991 original, but as noted above, Maurice himself took measures to protect Belle and notably agreed with Belle that Gaston would not have worked out for her (originally, Maurice also thought Gaston was alright for her), and he also was shown to be very protective of Belle after his wife had died from the plague, with Belle's mom specifically sacrificing herself by telling them to leave her behind to allow Belle a healthy life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the triplets (renamed to &amp;quot;Village Lasses&amp;quot;) in the remake were depicted as having haughtiness, arrogance, being jealous of Belle, as well as overall being nasty people, including briefly smirking at Belle when she was locked up in the paddy wagon as well as being actively involved in the arrest of Maurice as well as the later attack on Beast's castle (in the original film, the triplets were not shown to have any negative behavior to them besides their crushing on Gaston [not participating in the later arrest of Maurice, let alone the attack on Beast's castle shortly afterward during the climax, and also implying at one point that they were willing to give their blessing to Gaston marrying Belle when Belle refused him in the beginning of the film, and while they were present during the final lyrics for the Gaston reprise where Gaston explicitly divulged key details for his blackmail plan, the way it was framed could easily be interpreted as the triplets genuinely not knowing about the plan due to their absence from Maurice's arrival up to the scene where Gaston whispers the plan to LeFou.], and it is also heavily implied that they supported traditional marriage and were demeaned in the film by being referred to in the script as The Bimbettes and treated as dumb blondes for this reason). In addition, according to the film's director Bill Condon as well as one of the triplets' actresses, Rafaelle Cohen, the reason the triplets were intensely jealous and spiteful of Belle was because their mother neglected them while doting on Belle, showcasing the dangers of parental neglect.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Big Green''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie had one of the characters blame &amp;quot;Reaganomics&amp;quot; for the lack of job opportunities in the town and also one of the team's players was an anchor baby.  In the end, one of the coaches, who was a sheriff in Texas, was able to get the player and his illegal mother a way to stay.  So it was also favorable toward illegal immigration.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$17,736,619&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Birth of a Nation''&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|This infamously racist film, the longest feature ever made at the time, begins by documenting the [[American Civil War]], then depicts the [[Ku Klux Klan]] as &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot; who vanquish people of color, who are outrageous black racial stereotypes, from political positions and from their lawful right to vote (the KKK was founded by the Democrat Party, even though the Left has repeatedly tried denying and covering up the connection between the two). It was the first ever film to be shown at the White House under Democrat segregationist President [[Woodrow Wilson]], and it significantly influenced his already-racist core to segregate the White House and various departments.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blue State''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|What looks like a romantic comedy actually encourages the false idea that [[liberalism]] must be established and conservatism abolished in America, as the main character follows up on his absurd vow to move to Canada if [[George W. Bush]] is re-elected president.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bob Roberts''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-conservative propaganda piece, directed by leftist Tim Robbins and released during the 1992 election, has a similar premise to that of ''The Candidate'' and denigrates conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,479,470&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Borat''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal shock jock Sacha Baron Cohen falsely portrays American conservatives as uneducated racists.&lt;br /&gt;
|$67,800,000&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Borat Subsequent Moviefilm''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sacha Baron Cohen goes a step further making a pro-Biden propaganda film. He tries to blame [[COVID-19]] on [[Donald Trump]], and falsely accuses him of being a [[fascist]]. He makes matters worse when he harasses [[Mike Pence]] and [[Rudy Giuliani]], and falsely portrays them as pedophiles.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Born on the Fourth of July''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This radically anti-[[Vietnam War]] biographical film was produced and directed by Communist sympathizer and twice wounded Vietnam War veteran Oliver Stone, starring Tom Cruise as paralyzed Vietnam War vet-turned-anti-Vietnam War leftist protester and Communist sympathizer [[Ron Kovic]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,001,698&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bushwick''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|TV-MA&lt;br /&gt;
|The dystopian thriller features Red State dwellers (depicted as racist) declaring war on Hipster Brooklyn.&lt;br /&gt;
|N./A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Butler''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Ronald Reagan]] is falsely portrayed as indifferent toward apartheid in South Africa; Nancy Reagan is played by anti-American traitor Jane Fonda, and staunch feminist Oprah Winfrey plays Cecil's wife.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$116,632,095&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Call Jane''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-abortion, anti-family, and pro-feminism. Another Hollywood attempt to destroy America that thankfully backfired.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Candidate''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; fails to be a political satire as it fails to lampoon both sides of the coin and supports [[George McGovern]] at every turn. It was released during the 1972 election year as a smear campaign against [[Richard Nixon]] and his conservative colleagues. Conservative star [[James Stewart]] refused to star in it for that reason&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068334/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Capitalism: A Love Story]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Moore, staying true to his propaganda film format, relentlessly attacks America's [[capitalist]] [[economy]] with claims of alleged financial inequality.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,363,397&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Casualties of War''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-Vietnam war statement film starring Sean Penn involves a gang of American soldiers raping a Vietnamese woman. This paints America soldiers as the bad guys while failing to acknowledge how the Viet Cong, Khmer Rouge, and other Communist Insurgents did the same thing to a far larger scale.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,671,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Che''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008; 2009&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the name, the film is a two-part biopic for the Argentine [[Marxist]] terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]], who is blindly treated sympathetically as a &amp;quot;martyr&amp;quot; for [[Communism]] in the West.&lt;br /&gt;
|US$40.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The China Syndrome''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A fictional [[nuclear power]] plant melts down. The film greatly over-hypes this risk of a [[nuclear accident]] (or meltdown) and the resultant damage. This film, along with the [[Three Mile Island]] incident (which occurred shortly after the film's release), are both credited for killing the nuclear power industry in America.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,718,367&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Contender''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This film about the 2000 presidential election is little more than a pro-[[Al Gore]] propaganda piece by liberal studio executives and [[Hollywood values]]. Conservative star Gary Oldman also told IGN that the film was supposed to be apolitical, but it was edited to vilify Republicans&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ign.com/articles/2001/02/26/interview-with-gary-oldman&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$17,872,723&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Das Boot''&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-American war film looks at [[World War II]] from the Nazi perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,487,676&lt;br /&gt;
|-   &lt;br /&gt;
|''Dawn of the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Besides containing outbursts of graphic violence, this stand-alone sequel to George A. Romero's ''Night of the Living Dead'' is against capitalism because the consumers are zombies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9487PyyblpQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 2004 Zack Snyder-directed remake abandoned this. &lt;br /&gt;
|$55 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Day of the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal scientists who plan to tame zombies are the &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot;, while the common-sense conservative soldiers (whose plan is to euthanize them all) are the &amp;quot;villains&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
|$5,000,000 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dead Man Walking'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It senselessly criticizes [[capital punishment]] with an ending that left some liberal viewers even more confused.&lt;br /&gt;
|$39,363,635&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Devil's Backbone''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes the Communistic Spanish Loyalists in the Spanish Civil War as &amp;quot;good guys&amp;quot; while demonizing [[Francisco Franco]]'s forces. These themes, promoted by Marxist director Guillermo del Toro, were later expanded upon in ''Pan's Labyrinth''.&lt;br /&gt;
|US$6.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Dictator]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A Middle Easterner takes over America in this raunchy, vulgar &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; straining for controversy.&lt;br /&gt;
|$59,650,222&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dogville'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An [[Anti-American]] propaganda film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,680,836&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb''&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Loosely based on Peter George's 1958 thriller novel ''Red Alert'', this black comedy is against war, the military, and nuclear weaponry and tries to downplay the seriousness of Cold War-era fears of a nuclear apocalypse.&lt;br /&gt;
|$9.4 million in North America&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The East is Red''&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|A Communist Chinese dance epic made during the Cultural Revolution. This was made with direct input of Mao Zedong himself. The film depicts Mao as the &amp;quot;savior&amp;quot; of China, and has many typical pro-Communist messages one would expect.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Eternal Jew''&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda film was made with direct input from [[Adolf Hitler]], who made sure the anti-Semitism was as blunt and direct as possible. Most audiences were shocked at the crudity of the messages.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fahrenheit 9/11'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A [[Michael Moore]] movie, which distorts the tangential link between the [[Bush]] family and the [[Bin Laden]] family. The title was also taken from ''[[Fahrenheit 451]]'', a book that warned people about book burnings, proving that not only do liberals steal titles from other works, but aren't even creative on how to have the titles directly connect to their works.&lt;br /&gt;
|$119,194,771&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fair Game''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another Bush bash flick starring [[Communist]] Sean Penn. 2010 film rehashes the lead up to the [[Iraq War|war in Iraq]] and [[Valerie Plame]]'s role. It's a typical un-American Hollywood film with &amp;quot;The [[narrative]] that [[Karl Rove]] and [[Dick Cheney]]'s Chief of Staff [[Scooter Libby]] were nefarious behind-the-scenes players intent on destroying innocent reputations while pushing the nation into war on false pretenses.&amp;quot; There's also no mention of Iraq Liberation Act which was signed by [[Bill Clinton]] five years before the war in Iraq. &lt;br /&gt;
|$9,540,691&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fire Down Below''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Steven Seagal plays a Gary Stu-like role in this environmentalist feature.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,228,448&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Frost/Nixon]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the title, it attempts to further tarnish the reputation of [[Richard Nixon]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,622,031&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Game Change''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal]] haters play [[conservative]]s in an [[HBO]] film about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain]] and Palin denounced the film, and called it fiction.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''God Bless America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite its name, the movie is a rip-off of the conservative film ''Falling Down''. This &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; has a miserable man and his foul-mouthed [[nihilist]] girl sidekick summarily execute [[Tea Party]] members, a [[Fox News]]-like host, Christians, and other conservative stereotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$123,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Good Shepherd''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite covering the founding of the CIA, the film was extremely anti-CIA in its messaging, where it doubles down on making the CIA look as bad as possible and overemphasizes on CIA failures such as the Bay of Pigs invasion and their experimenting with LSD, while conveniently ignoring the crimes the KGB and similar intelligence agencies within the Soviet bloc.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$99.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Green Zone''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Is extremely anti-War on Terror to such an extent that it comes across as blatantly anti-American, as it repeats the falsehood that Pentagon officials lied about there being [[WMDs in Iraq]] simply so they could gin up a war in the Middle East (completely ignoring that various other intelligence agencies, including even France, a country that didn't even want a War with Iraq, acknowledging that Saddam had WMDs), and even had the main villain, who was modeled after Donald Rumsfeld, sending assassination teams against those in the know about the conspiracy. The film even went as far as to portray Iraqi terrorists as the &amp;quot;good guys&amp;quot;. The film was also notorious as being Universal Studios' biggest box office bomb as a result.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/3/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$94.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Heaven's Gate''&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite the Christian sounding name. This notorious box office bomb comes from Marxist filmmaker Michael Cimino portrays America as the villain in the Johnson County War, has an anti-capitalist rhetoric, and features a pro-illegal immigration message. Furthermore, it glamorizes [[sexual immorality|prostitution and adultery]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hidden Agenda''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the [[IRA]] oppressed freedom fighters while painting the Unionists as monsters. The film also doesn't speak highly of [[Margaret Thatcher]] either.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Hunt''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based in part on the 1924 short story ''The Most Dangerous Game'' but given a modern political twist, focusing on conservatives from different walks of life being rounded up and hunted for sport by rich elitist liberals. Wikipedia claims in its article about the movie that it is &amp;quot;satire&amp;quot; and, in the article, stated that the movie drew criticism from members of the conservative media as an &amp;quot;alleged&amp;quot; portrayal of liberals hunting supporters of Donald Trump (with the term &amp;quot;alleged&amp;quot; inserted in the article in an attempt to brush off and dismiss said criticism), but it is simply Hollywood elites engaging in thinking out loud about what they wish to do to those who don't agree with or support their leftist political/social groupthink.  The movie drew high-profile criticism from none other than President Trump, who used it to criticize Hollywood for its racism, hatred and promotion of violence in the media, which it then uses inflammatorily to blame others and create chaos,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/08/09/donald-trump-thunders-against-racist-hollywood-they-create-violence-then-try-to-blame-others/ Donald Trump Thunders Against Racist Hollywood: &amp;quot;They Create Violence, Then Try to Blame Others&amp;quot;] at Breitbart News Network&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while conservative author [[David Horowitz]] called for the movie not to be released, stating that it may serve only to incite easily-influenced leftists to commit violence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/david-horowitz-racism-the-hunt-liberal/2019/08/08/id/927939/ David Horowitz to Newsmax TV: Left Seeks to 'Exterminate'] at Newsmax&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The movie was subsequently withdrawn from release by distributor Universal Pictures in the wake of the recent mass shootings in [[El Paso Walmart shooting|El Paso]] and [[Dayton nightclub shooting|Dayton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcJGfYiUDDE Universal Studios pulls the movie ''The Hunt''] at Fox News YouTube channel&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was eventually recut, with the trailers making clear that the rich elitist liberals are intended to be the villains&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2020/02/the-hunt-returns-with-a-trailer-making-it-known-liberal-elites-are-the-bad-guys/102988/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,812,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''I, Tonya''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|History revisionist film that paints criminal Tonya Harding as a victim, reframing the narrative around her implication in the crime of attacking Nancy Kerrigan as justified&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/971183001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2018/01/i_nauseated_the_oregonians_for.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. There's also an anti-family theme, as Harding's mother is falsely portrayed as psychologically abusive, despite the fact that she was nothing like that in real life&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://people.com/movies/tonya-harding-mother-monster-friend/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$53 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Independence Day: Resurgence''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it is the sequel to the patriotic and, to a certain extent, conservative film ''Independence Day'', it does not at all reference the concepts of patriotism, American exceptionalism, or even national sovereignty. Instead, most of the movie seems to support globalism, and Doctor Okun is revealed to be a homosexual despite such never being implied in the original film. Forced [[multicultural]] elements are present as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$389.7 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''JFK''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This historically inaccurate account on [[President John F. Kennedy]]'s assassination serves liberal filmmaker Oliver Stone's insanely fanatic conspiracy theories. For example, the filmmaker pinpoints the blame to the &amp;quot;real murder&amp;quot; of Kennedy: the conservative politicians, the U.S. Military, and then-Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, all of whom want America to go to war in Vietnam because Kennedy rejected the American involvement. Stone described the film as a &amp;quot;counter-myth&amp;quot; to the Warren Commission's &amp;quot;fictional myth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,405,498&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''John Q''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This laughably inaccurate portrayal of the American healthcare system depicts private healthcare executives as heartless, and uses manipulative melodrama to promote socialized medicine. It also attacks the [[second amendment]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lolita'' (1997 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The second film to be based on Vladimir Nabokov's infamous novel, the first being by Stanley Kubrick. However, in contrast to the very tame Kubrick version (limited only by the censorship of it's day), this version indulges with the gratuitous sexuality that made the book so controversial. The story portrays the relationship of Lolita and Humbert as a beautiful romance. Also, as implied by the tagline of the film's poster, the main message is that &amp;quot;Age is Just a Number&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lone Ranger''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This attack on [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]] portrays the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as &amp;quot;thugs&amp;quot; who support their actions. It distorts the messages of its source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV and radio serials, as dumbfounded and unintelligent, instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot-smoker]] [[Johnny Depp]]) not only as the &amp;quot;star&amp;quot; of the film, but as the Lone Ranger's &amp;quot;voice of reason&amp;quot;, too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$89,302,115&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Love, Simon''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This coming-of-age film is an attempt by Hollywood to create a &amp;quot;family friendly&amp;quot;, pseudo-conservative take on the gay romance genre. While in theory this sounds less objectionable than most offerings of this kind, it could also be considered more deceptive and dangerous. This is because it obscures the uglier, raunchier aspects of the gay lifestyle in order to create a very misleading, &amp;quot;heartwarming&amp;quot; fantasy of gay life and relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
|$66.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Magnificent Seven'' (2016 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This remake of a Western about seven [[vigilante]] gunfighters out to save a peaceful Mexican farming village from marauders (itself an adaptation of the Japanese cinematic classic ''Seven Samurai'') suits the left agenda, as capitalists are the &amp;quot;villains&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://missliberty.com/magnificent-seven-remake-is-angry-radical-fantasy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$93,145,387&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Manderlay'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[James Caan]] refused to star in this anti-American sequel to ''Dogville'', describing director Lars von Trier as anti-American and stated that he himself is an &amp;quot;ultra-conservative&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$674,918&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Matrix'' series&lt;br /&gt;
|1999 (''[[The Matrix]]''); 2003 (''The Matrix Reloaded'' and ''The Matrix Revolutions''); 2021 (''The Matrix Resurrections'')&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A hacker discovers his world is a replica of the world as it was before a cataclysmic future event in which intelligent machines took over humanity, so he joins a resistance to end the machines' reign. Despite this salvation narrative, the whole trilogy glorifies anarchism and [[nihilism]] (even including a brief nod to [[Jean Baudrillard]]'s &amp;quot;On Nihilism&amp;quot; chapter from Simulacra and Simulation), hinting several times towards a pro-Communist, anti-American (with one scene in the first film, when Thomas Anderson meets Agent Smith, having Anderson's dossier listing Anderson as hailing from &amp;quot;FU, USA&amp;quot; which not-so-subtly is meant to say &amp;quot;[Censored] You, USA&amp;quot;), [[anti-Christian]] view. The second film's Architect scene tries to give a &amp;quot;devastating critique/twist&amp;quot; to salvation myths, with the Architect as a malevolent allegorical substitute for the Christian [[God]]. In this same scene, a panel of screens implicitly compares [[George W. Bush]] to Hitler during a discussion of evil in the world, and it features wars and conflicts specifically involving America. In fact, far-[[leftist|Left]] [[race-baiting]] scholar Cornel West was hired to play a role in the film specifically because the [[The Wachowskis|Wachowski Brothers]] (as they were known at the time) were influenced by his pro-socialist/Communist and anti-American rhetoric. The first film's throwaway dialogue between the main villain Agent Smith and the treasonous freedom fighter Cipher is a shallow attempt at insulting [[Ronald Reagan]] because Smith implies that Cipher will become the next Ronald Reagan should he succeed in betraying his allies to the agents. The trilogy's overall depiction of religion is closer to Gnosticism, even with Neo, the main protagonist, presented as a savior-figure. The Wachowskis openly admitted in an interview that they deliberately modeled the entire story after Friedrich Nietzche's writings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.equip.org/article/the-matrix-unloaded-revelations/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Bart, “Cracking the Wachowski’s Code,” Variety.com, May 25, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The trilogy has been cited as the cause for various murders, ultimately leading to a variant of the [[insanity defense]] known as the Matrix Defense&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/21/ctv.matrix.insanity/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and it shares similar themes to the [[Worst Liberal Video Games|Worst Liberal Video Game]] ''Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty'' because Hideo Kojima confessed that he intended to use the same themes for the game.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20130328062143/http://www.gamespot.com/news/hideo-kojima-speaks-about-the-matrix-2448486&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A fourth movie was announced to be in the works.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/08/the-wachowskis-announce-the-matrix-4-is-in-the-works/91350/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The movies overall had several hints at a Marxist (and even Maoist) outlook,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/1408419/posts?page=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which was later confirmed by Larry Wachowski, or rather, Lilly Wachowski, who stated that &amp;quot;she&amp;quot; created the trilogy &amp;quot;out of a lot of anger and a lot of rage, and it's rage at capitalism and corporatized structure and forms of oppression.&amp;quot;, as well as overall as an extension of &amp;quot;her&amp;quot; angst at the &amp;quot;oppression&amp;quot; of [[Gender confusion|being born male instead of female]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lilly-wachowski-shares-how-matrix-franchise-was-inspired-by-rage-oppression-before-transition-1296914&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Unlike the previous entries, the latest entry, ''The Matrix Resurrections'', doesn't bother to hide the fact that it is pro-[[transgenderism]] and shows a level of outward contempt for [[family values]] that is unprecedented in Hollywood - as the character of Trinity only finds her life to be fulfilling when she abandons her husband and children to lead a Marxist revolution against conservatives.  The villain of this entry is based on Conservative commentator [[Ben Shapiro]] and wrongly portrays his common sense views on trans people as Nazism.&lt;br /&gt;
| $592,370,339 (all together) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Midnight in Paris''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The main character, a liberal author, is open-minded and intellectual. He has an unsuccessful relationship with a woman whose family is Republican and are depicted as being &amp;quot;materialistic&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;selfish&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;narrow-minded&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot; towards any country that is not the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,816,662 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Milk'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008 &lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sean Penn portrays openly homosexual politician [[Harvey Milk]] in this biography.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,841,299&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Motorcycle Diaries'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Walter Salles directs this fawning monument to [[Communist]] terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,781,387&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mulan''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The live action remake of the animated film of the same name. It ends up doubling down on the feminist rhetoric from the original, implies [[big government]] is good, and is particularly infamous for being a blatant example of Disney's current management's hypocrisy where they refuse to do business over Georgia, yet not only worked with China to develop the film (including censorships), but also went as far as to specifically cooperate with various departments of the Xijiping province that held authority over concentration camps. The lead actress for the film even sang praises for the Communist Party during the latter's crackdowns on Democracy demonstrators in Hong Kong during filming.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|The more openly liberal sequel to the apolitical ''The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!'' pushes environmentalism and attacks productive businesses, especially the oil industry.&lt;br /&gt;
|$86,930,411&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Night of the Living Dead]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This independent horror abomination by George A. Romero vilifies [[nuclear energy]], as nuclear fallout from an exploding space probe in Earth's atmosphere is said to be the cause of the recently deceased becoming reanimated. In addition, it negatively portrays police officers as racist: a group of officers kills Ben, the African American protagonist, when they mistake him for one of the dead, which Romero intentionally chose to have happen to accuse the police of being behind racial lynchings. Had two [[sequel]]s , ''Dawn of the Dead'' (1978 Italian) and ''Day of the Dead'' (1985).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Nixon'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This historically inaccurate biography of [[Richard Nixon]] is directed by liberal filmmaker [[Oliver Stone]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,681,765&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Obvious Child'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie normalizes abortion after casual sex with humorous style. The movie didnt get success they expect &lt;br /&gt;
|$1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Okja''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|This environmentalist propaganda piece vilifies capitalists and essentially plagiarizes the Buster Keaton classic ''Go West''.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''On Deadly Ground''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The film demonizes the oil industry as greedy and unsympathetic while praising the [[EPA]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,590,458&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pan's Labyrinth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Aside from it promoting paganism and the occult, it also demonized [[Francisco Franco]]'s Spain and promoted the Spanish Republicans from the Spanish Civil War due to it being made by Marxist director [[Guillermo del Toro]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2007/01/19/pans-labyrinth-allegory-of-spanish-civil-war/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$83.3 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Platoon''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Vietnam War and anti-American war film which depicts most of the American soldiers as psychopathic war criminals, while the &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; soldiers smoke marijuana, and also depicts the NVA as sympathetic. Was also made by the far-left filmmaker Oliver Stone, who in an especially shameful element of irony and hypocrisy was himself a Vietnam veteran.&lt;br /&gt;
|$6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Post''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An obvious promotion of the leaking of the ''[[Pentagon Papers]]''. It treats the liberal journalists who committed the leaking in a positive light, while depicting Nixon in a negative light (despite Nixon never being responsible for the Pentagon Papers in the first place, and it being done under the auspices of Democrats JFK and LBJ).&lt;br /&gt;
|$179.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Professor Marston and the Wonder Women''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Its talks about William Moulton Marston and Elizabeth Holloway Marston life who create [[Wonder Woman]] character. The movie promote immoral polyamorous relationships. The movie ended horribly at box office &lt;br /&gt;
|$1.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''The Purge (series)&lt;br /&gt;
|2013, 2014, 2016, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Movie featuring gratuitous graphic violence, and normalization of violent degenerate behavior. It is based on a political movement called the &amp;quot;New Founding Fathers of America&amp;quot; (NFFA), which is portrayed as a reformation of the Republican party (this can be based on how a majority of the people that played roles for characters of the &amp;quot;NFFA&amp;quot; were white and old, which is how Liberals see Republicans). The protagonists are what would generally be considered by the Democrats to be people who would vote for them (black, Hispanic, Asian, women, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
|$446.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Recount''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|The 2008 [[HBO]] movie on the [[United States presidential election, 2000|2000 Presidential election]] and its aftermath in [[Florida]], presented from a [[Liberal bias|liberal-biased]] viewpoint. A look into how [[Democrats]] and their [[Mainstream media|liberal media]] supporters claim the [[Republicans]] &amp;quot;stole&amp;quot; the [[election]] and the alleged role of its party members that the Democrats claim &amp;quot;made it happen&amp;quot; (although in reality, it was the Democrats themselves who tried to steal the election for their candidate [[Al Gore]] [[United States presidential election, 2000#Recount|by attempting to commit vote fraud in Florida through ordering selective recounts in Democrat-friendly areas while ignoring Republican-strong areas]], only to be stopped when the US Supreme Court ruled the Democrats' end-run attempt around election rules to be illegal). Republicans are portrayed as ghoulish and cited as manufacturing demonstrations. Both the real [[Warren Christopher]] and [[James Baker]] contend the film's portrayal of the former is hopelessly untrue.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Redacted''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Brian De Palma’s 2007 fictional anti-Iraq War film funded by Mark Cuban. The film is credited with inspiring a [[terrorist]] attack that killed two U.S. servicemen in [[Germany]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$65,388&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Red Joan''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the life of Communist traitor Melita Norwood, who gave up schematics on the British nuclear weapons program to the KGB. The film may be vaguely anti-Stalinist, but is pro-Communist, anti-Cold War, and anti-Western. Near the end of the movie, when the woman's son accuses her of betraying her country, she insists that somehow, she is the real patriot. It's also pro-feminist, as male characters are portrayed as supposedly belittling her, encouraging her to serve tea and do laundry, and rather than leaving these insignificances out of the story, the movie portrays it as integral to the plot when she supposedly tricked the British police into thinking she was stupid and asking them if they wanted tea, though that part of the story is in all likelihood inaccurate and never even happened. Also, the decision by United States President Harry Truman to drop two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to end the Second World War is strongly condemned, and to an extent, is demonized. At the end of the movie, she arrogantly says ''twice'', &amp;quot;I was right.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Right&amp;quot; to give Joseph Stalin, the evilest man in history, instructions to build nuclear weapons? She refers to the fact that sharing the nuclear weapons secrets prevented the Cold War from turning hot, and while the situation of M.A.D. (Mutually Assured Destruction) prevented such an occurrence, there never even would have been a Cold War if Stalin had never acquired nuclear weapons, or otherwise the U.S. would have won a lot sooner. The movie also implied that the tactics of the British police and MI5 were similar to the KGB. Imagine a film had been released portraying Jakiw Palij, the last ex-Nazi in the United States, who was deported by President Donald Trump to Germany, in such a sympathetic fashion. Just more communist propaganda from Hollywood.&lt;br /&gt;
|$9,800,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Reds''&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|As a biographical film on the life of notorious American [[Communist]] journalist John Reed, ''Reds'' is a sentimental and overly romanticized portrait of [[Communism]], [[humanism]], and [[anarchism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,382,659&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Red State''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Some of the most disgusting hate-filled liberal propaganda ever filmed, at least in the Obama era when America supposedly became a &amp;quot;center-left&amp;quot; nation. Starring John Goodman and a cast of nobodies.  The film is premised on the idea that Red States are populated by the likes of anti-gay followers of an allegorical preacher in the vein of [[Fred Phelps]] of the [[Westboro Baptist Church]] who performs ritual murder on gays ''ala'' [[Matthew Shepard]].  John Goodman of the [[ATF]] leads the federal government cavalry to the rescue evoking the glorious image of the Clinton era [[Waco massacre]]. Critics called it one of the director's &amp;quot;Twitter rants fleshed out into film with equal portions of bile sprayed at both church and state&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;Messy, overwritten, ...kind of a bore....it's not a horror movie by any usual definition. More like teen horror movie morphs into Waco disaster&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;fails onscreen and off at its world premiere ... A shoddy film and a bait-and-switch event fail to satisfy on any level&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;it's clear that the smart alec writer still has some things to learn about making a great film.&amp;quot;  Red State won the Best Motion Picture award at the 2011 Sitges Film Festival, while Michael Parks was named Best Actor.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.1 million domestically&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; (- $2.2 million loss over its $4 million budget)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Return of the Living Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|In another stand-alone sequel to ''Night of the Living Dead'', the military is supposedly responsible for the release of a toxin that turns people into zombies. The military is also shown to be inconstant, as they &amp;quot;fix&amp;quot; this by nuking the city of zombies. An anti-[[Ronald Reagan|Reagan]] statement some may say (the Left feared that Reagan would create nuclear holocaust, which is present in this film). &lt;br /&gt;
|$14,237,880 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Robocop''&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Left-wing smut-peddler Paul Verhoeven's failed attempt to depict all police forces and corporations as evil.  It also contains an [[environmentalism|environmentalist]] message with the &amp;quot;6000 SUX,&amp;quot; a car that pollutes and guzzles gas for no other reason than to be environmentally unfriendly. Verhoeven is also a member of the Liberal [[Jesus Seminar]], which also inspired him to make the movie a grotesque parody of Christ's resurrection. &lt;br /&gt;
| 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rosemary's Baby&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film that attempts to downplay Satanism and Witchcraft. It is also a piece of feminist propaganda, since a mother tries taking her pregnancy into her own hands, instead of allowing her husband to choose for her. This feminist message is fixed when the doctor recognizes the woman's absurdity and calls her husband.&lt;br /&gt;
|$33,396,740&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sacco e Vanzetti''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the title, the film acts as a biopic of the anarchist murderers [[Sacco and Vanzetti]], with them being portrayed in a sympathetic light. In addition, the [[Essay:Worst Liberal Song|Worst Liberal Song]] &amp;quot;Here's to You&amp;quot;, also dealing with the two anarchists in a similar light, was released with this movie as part of its soundtrack.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Selene''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Claims the [[Hispanic]] pop star Selene was &amp;quot;Mexican-American&amp;quot; and bitterly attempts to blame [[Ronald Reagan]] for the severe economic dislocation and [[stagflation]] created by Democrats and socialists in the late 1970s and early 1980s.  In fact, Selene was known as the &amp;quot;Queen of Tejano music,&amp;quot; ''Tejano'' being the Spanish word for Texas and Tejano music likened to an American version of Spanish County Western music.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$32.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shoot 'Em Up''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An anti-second amendment film, the so-called &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot; is a [[nihilist]] and the &amp;quot;villains&amp;quot; are trying to defend gun rights and the Second Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
|$12,807,139&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Short Circuit''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|On top of just being an blatant ''E.T.'' rip-off, ''Short Circuit'' also downgrades the military (or the Reagan Administration in general).&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,697,761&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''[[SiCKO]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another Michael Moore film which spread many falsehoods about American [[healthcare]] while unduly glorifying the so-called benefits of [[socialized medicine]] such as now found in [[Obamacare]]. Memorably referred to [[Cuba]]n healthcare as being &amp;quot;better&amp;quot; than American healthcare. &lt;br /&gt;
|$24,540,079&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Siege''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't be fooled by the fact that Bruce Willis is in it. Willis plays the antagonist, an Army general who institutes martial law in New York City after a wave of terrorist attacks. Portrays Muslims as the &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; while demonizing the military.&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,932,372&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek: Into Darkness''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Aside from it being a blatant ripoff on ''Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan'' in terms of plotline, the film also has several anti-War on Terror messages, as indicated by both Benedict Cumberbatch and Simon Pegg.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/2/22/4-ways-star-trek-into-darkness-shills-for-surrender-in-the-war-on-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$467.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Süss the Jew''&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda film, that was notorious for it successfully pushing the anti-Semitic agenda throughout Nazi Germany via a subtle method.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Syriana''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Is anti-War on Terror, with the film heavily implying that Saudi Arabia was in the middle of liberal reforms that America interfered with due to oil businessmen (despite the exact opposite being true).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/4/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$94 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''They Live''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Capitalists are portrayed as evil aliens planning to rule the world. The director John Carpenter also claimed in interviews that the film was anti-[[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/john-carpenter-they-live-was-about-giving-the-finger-to-reagan/#/0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,008,928 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Thomas Crown Affair''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Supports the claim that capitalism causes crime.&lt;br /&gt;
| $14 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tomorrowland''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the fact that the film had basis on the theme park proposed by [[Walt Disney]] fool you. The film was anti-capitalist and pro-liberal/progressive values propaganda with it pushing the exact opposite messages that Disney himself wanted to impart. Bill Whittle, when reviewing the film, even mentioned that had he still been alive and saw the film, Disney would most likely have torn up his proposal for [[Disneyland]] and proceeded to drink himself to death in despair of what the film claimed his idea was.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmxeoh69G4o&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$209.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tout va Bien'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1972 &lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Jane Fonda]] &amp;quot;art film&amp;quot; directed by [[Jean-Luc Godard]], who was notoriously anti-American and idolized [[Karl Marx]], is nothing more than a propaganda film for Communism, as it sympathizes with the youths who partook in the [[May 1968 riots|May 1968 Communist uprisings]] in [[France]] and features blunt anti-American imagery.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Triumph of the Will''&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|The world's most infamous Nazi propaganda film (even though the Left denies it, the Nazis were in truth left wing National Socialists).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Trumbo''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Dalton Trumbo, one of the Hollywood Ten who was jailed for his Communist beliefs, is portrayed as a free-speech martyr, and a &amp;quot;champion&amp;quot; of the First Amendment. All of his controversial beliefs are whitewashed, including his support of Lenin, Hitler (until the Nazi-Soviet Pact fell), Kim Il-Sung, and, of course, Stalin. Conversely, anti-Communists such as John Wayne, Hedda Hopper, Robert Taylor, Roy Brewer, the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), and the Motion Picture Alliance for the Preservation of American Ideals (MPA) are falsely portrayed as &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;oppressive&amp;quot;, and anti-free-speech.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,857,741	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Truth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Highly fictionalized political docudrama about the Killian documents controversy meant to further tarnish the reputation of [[George W. Bush]]. The film was not approved by then-current CBS President and CEO Leslie Moonves and CBS refused to air advertisements for the film due to its, as the network stated, &amp;quot;inaccuracies and distortions&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,541,854&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''V for Vendetta'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly glorifies [[anarchism]], [[homosexuality]] and [[Islam]]. It also depicts conservatives as evil and fascists (again).&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,511,035&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Vice'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Made by Socialist filmmaker Adam McKay, this movie exists solely to ridicule American patriot [[Dick Cheney]] and lies about his legacy, portraying him as an unlikable sociopath without morals.&lt;br /&gt;
|$75,500,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[W.]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie designed to denigrate the role of [[Christianity]] in U.S. [[politics]] and particularly in the life of [[George W. Bush]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,534,493&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''White House Down''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Mocks conservatives with a liberal plot twist that makes the [[TEA Party]] out to be &amp;quot;terrorists&amp;quot;. This movie was made by uber-liberals to counter the great conservative film; ''Olympus Has Fallen'', which depicts North Korean terrorists as the bad guys.&lt;br /&gt;
|$73,103,784&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Winchester''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based loosely on the Winchester Mystery House in San Jose, California. The film focuses more on its anti-gun message than the actual paranormal events.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/winchester-confronts-the-american-curse-of-firearms&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Z'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal propaganda that blames the [[military]] for liberal wrongdoing.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,283,305&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Socially Liberal Live-Action Films==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This Romanian film baselessly supports [[abortion]]. Liberals praised it when it won the Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,198,208&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''365 Days'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|A sexually explicit European movie that tried to be like a copy of ''Fifty shades of Gray''. This movie failed miserably, receiving 0% rating from notoriously liberal, biased [[Rotten Tomatoes]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$9.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Abyss'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal atheist [[James Cameron]] pushes the agenda that global warming is real and that the military is pure evil.&lt;br /&gt;
|$90,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Adoration'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-18&lt;br /&gt;
|The film tried to normalize the idea of ​​young boys having affairs with their friends' mothers. The movie failed miserably even with its many famous cast members. The movie's budget was $16 million, but it only grossed around $2.5 million at the box office. Even the liberal-leaning [[Rotten Tomatoes]] had a 33% rating.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[American Beauty]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Directed by homosexual Sam Mandes, this slice-of-life drama follows Lester Burnham, a depressed, middle-aged, unhappily married advertising executive who enters his midlife crisis and starts living like the rebellious teenager he was in the early 1970s when he becomes [[pedophilia|pedophilically]] interested in his 16-year-old daughter Jane's friend and high school classmate Angela Hayes, who often brags to her peers about being sexually experienced with older men. Only when he learns she is a virgin does he finally relent. Meanwhile, Lester's wife, Carolyn, has an affair with another married man. Likewise, Jane starts dating new neighbor boy Ricky Fitts, a would-be experimental filmmaker who pays for supplies by dealing [[marijuana]]. Ricky has a troubled relationship with his father, Colonel Frank, a negative representation of the military who is outwardly abusive towards his son and intolerant of homosexuals, but is also secretly &amp;quot;closeted&amp;quot; himself and goes so far as to murder Lester, to whom he is attracted, to keep it a secret.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''American Pie''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The first installment of a long-running film franchise primarily dealing with teenage sex and alcohol relies on jokes about sex and bodily functions, even treating date rape as &amp;quot;funny&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$102,561,004&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ammonite''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-18&lt;br /&gt;
|Is a history revisionist and immoral movie that was produced by the woke [[BBC]] and starred by woke actresses Kate Winslet and Saoirse Ronan. The movie portrayed the English paleontologist and fossil collector Marie Anning (1799-1847) and English geologist Charlotte Murchison (1788-1869) as women who had a lesbian affair with many sexually explicit scenes, which has no historical evidence to prove that. Despite the objections of the Anning family, producers continued with their distortion. Although the movie was nominated for many awards by woke liberal critics, it was a huge disaster for producers, gaining only gaining $1.4 million with a budget of $13.4 million.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''And Then We Danced''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This Swedish-[[Republic of Georgia|Georgian]] co-production pushes the homosexual agenda as it presents the story of a dancer who leaves his girlfriend and longtime dance partner to begin a homosexual affair with another male dancer.  Controversy erupted, and protests occurred when the movie was shown in its native Georgia due to the film's homosexual theme.  On account of that theme, it did very poorly at the box office.&lt;br /&gt;
|$281,159&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Animal House''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978, full title ''National Lampoon's Animal House''&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This college &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; glorifies [[alcohol abuse]], debauchery, [[nihilism]], cheating, extramarital sex, and all varieties of youthful rebellion. The dean, played by John Vernon, suggests that being &amp;quot;Fat, drunk, and stupid, son, is no way to go through life&amp;quot; to one of the rebellious youth representing the rowdy Delta Tau Chi fraternity, but he's depicted as the villain because of that. After the Delta boys are finally punished by being collectively expelled from college, they exact their revenge by sabotaging a homecoming parade, and do not face punishment for such a great misdeed. Even so, the film's &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot;, portrayed by one of Hollywood's most amoral actors ever, John Belushi, goes on to become a U.S. Senator, which is passed off as humorous.&lt;br /&gt;
|$141,600,000 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Anora''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| A sexually explicit porn movie filled with anti-Russian propaganda. The film failed miserably at the box office and didn't gain over 40$ million, but despite that, it was awarded the Academy Award for Best Picture.&lt;br /&gt;
|$6 million	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Atomic Blonde''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This Cold War film's major themes are feminism, the LGBT agenda, and racism against those with dark hair and eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,573,925&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Avatar (film)|Avatar]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The highest-grossing feature in history, directed by liberal James Cameron, enforces many destructive messages, including [[environmentalism]], [[feminism]], and the absurd claim that nature is [[God]]. It also ridicules the military and large businesses. The overall plotline hints at endorsing environmental terrorism, which Cameron indicated that he himself supported.&lt;br /&gt;
|$760,507,625&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Avatar (film)|Avatar: The Way of Water]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal atheist James Cameron's sequel to his highly overrated movie.  This is yet another nonsensical screed against [[capitalism]] that pushes [[political correctness]], [[woke|wokeism]], [[environmentalism]], and [[feminism]]. Once again, he celebrates eco-terrorism and treats [[paganism]] as truth. He also portrays the US government as savage terrorists who remorselessly torture children. Cameron also publicly promoted this sequel by sharing overtly disgusting and disrespectful views on pregnant women and describing [[testosterone]] as a &amp;quot;poison&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;toxin&amp;quot; that needs to be eradicated.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Babygirl''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-family and anti-motherhood film about mothers ditching their responsibilities to go wild. The movie was released in Christmas and led by liberal actress Nicole Kidman, the movie normalizes cheating wives, porn addiction, and [[BDSM]]. The movie got a huge push from liberal critics in [[Rotten Tomatoes]] with 76%, but got humiliated by audience rating with 48%.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Moms''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-family and anti-motherhood film about mothers ditching their responsibilities to go wild.&lt;br /&gt;
|$113,257,297&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Santa''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This insult to the sacred holiday of Christmas features gratuitous coarse language, sexual escapades, drunkenness, and the main plot involving a con man posing as a Mall Santa so he and his dwarf accomplice can rob the mall's safe. It was bad enough that critics panned Disney for allowing the trashing of a cultural icon like Santa Claus, as well as even then-Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, being disgusted with the resulting film, acting as one of the main reasons for Miramax being cut loose from Disney alongside ''Kill Bill''.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Santa 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This sequel follows the already-revolting ''Bad Santa''. Miramax, which distributed this movie as well as its predecessor, was acquired in 2016 by beIN Media Group, which is owned by Islamic propaganda channel [[Al Jazeera]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$23.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Teacher''&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Cameron Diaz stars as an awful high school teacher, who is always getting high and drunk, tries to get breast-implant surgery, and encourages cheating and stealing from her students. The movie contains no [[morals]] and is filled with offensive sexual content.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Barbie''&lt;br /&gt;
| 2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the iconic titular fashion doll and directed by liberal misa-feminist Greta Gerwig,  ''Barbie'' is a [[feminist]], [[misandrist]] and pro-transgender and gender division agenda film depicting the fantasy realm of Barbieland as a matriarchal utopia where all the different variations of Barbie hold important jobs (including Doctor Barbie, portrayed by a bilogical man) and their male Ken counterparts are unemployed outcasts alongside discontinued toylines. The marketing, knowing perfectly people would not come to see the movie, released every trailer showing just few vague and neutral seconds of the film to trick the public into believing it was just a genuine, apolitical and neutral Barbie-style comedy movie, with Mattel executives panicking to the point of stating via interview that the ''Barbie'' is absolutely not a feminist agenda-driven movie in an attempt to avoid another potential boycott, despite the words of the cast and Greta Gerwig stating the contrary (with also creepy and disturbing statements about &amp;quot;educating the public&amp;quot; on &amp;quot;problematic gender roles/norms&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;social construct&amp;quot;) and other red flags months before the release in the theaters. One obvious message is that the matriarchal Barbieland, where the Kens are treated as insignificant, weak, superfluous, and unimportant &amp;quot;accessories&amp;quot;, is the perfect and ideal world compared to the &amp;quot;patriarchal society&amp;quot; in the &amp;quot;real world&amp;quot;, despite the fact that the modern Western world described by the film and Greta Gerwig is far from being such a patriarchal and dystopian society. Gerwig self-inserts herself briefly like liberal, feminist, and leftist directors typically do as further proof of their disturbing and creepy narcissism, egocentrism, and self-absorption.&lt;br /&gt;
| $337 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beginners''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes homosexuality and &amp;quot;[[coming out of the closet]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,790,894&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Behaving badly''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This movie promotes promiscuity, alcoholism and drug addiction, and it portrays pastors and nuns negatively. The revenue for the movie was a huge failure. The movie got 0% rating on the notoriously liberal, biased website [[Rotten Tomatoes]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$422,697&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Being John Malkovich''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This biopic celebrates homosexuality and includes a large amount of vulgar humor.&lt;br /&gt;
|$637,721 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ben &amp;amp; Arthur''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|As the title suggests, this is a pro-homosexual propaganda movie that also portrays Christians as &amp;quot;hateful bigots&amp;quot;. The film has the reputation of being one of the most hated homosexual movies by critics and audiences alike, even among homosexuals. Wikipedia also acknowledges this, as this movie is on the page &amp;quot;List of movies considered the worst&amp;quot;. It was a major box-office bomb.&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Big Lebowski]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies [[drug abuse]], laziness, and [[nihilism]]. The Dude (played by Jeff Bridges) is an anti-war stoner. It became a cult classic among Liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|$17,451,873&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Billy Elliot]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This British film stars a boy who represents the homosexual agenda by wanting to be a ballet dancer rather than play sports. There are very poor family values as the family is constantly cursing at one another.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21,995,263&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bio-Dome'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|It's a stoner film with an environmentalist theme.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,427,615&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Birdcage''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Yet another pro-[[homosexual agenda]] and conservative bashing film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$124,060,553&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blow''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the life of drug dealer and suspected murderer George Jung.&lt;br /&gt;
|$52,990,775&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blue is the Warmest Color'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|This French film supports the [[homosexual agenda]] by graphically showing lesbian sex and falsely idealizing the concept that homosexuals can be sound mentors to young children. At the Cannes Film Festival, which was headed by liberal [[Steven Spielberg]] and had a board that included ''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' director Ang Lee, it was unanimously awarded the top prize.  It is widely believed that this victory was due to France's legalization of [[same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]] eight days prior. At least one of the film's stars admitted she felt disgusted by her role.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,199,787&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boat Trip''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This film, about two men who accidentally board a gay cruise, shamelessly promotes the homosexual agenda and presents the attempted sexual assault of a man by a woman as &amp;quot;humorous&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,020,293&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=boattrip.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boogie Nights'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A young man journeys through the pornography industry in the 1970s and 1980s and glorifies the exploitation of women.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26,400,640&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boyhood''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Centered on a family raised by a single mother, this slice-of-life drama, which took exactly 12 years to produce to capture realistic age progression for the cast, downplays the importance of a father in a child's growth and development, mocks conservative Christians, and promotes underage drinking and pot smoking. The lead actor, Ellar Coltrane, later &amp;quot;came out&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;non-binary&amp;quot; and has accomplished nothing noteworthy since.&lt;br /&gt;
|$44,400,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boys Don't Cry''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It glorifies the choice of a young girl to embrace homosexual and transgender life choices, dishonesty, and premarital relations. Furthermore, it caricatures and exaggerates natural reactions to her perversion, all in aid of promoting the [[homosexual agenda]]. On that note, JoAnn Brandon, the real life mother of Teena Brandon (the aforementioned woman who entered those lifestyles), condemned the movie and especially the star Hilary Swank's acceptance speech (in particular, the former failing to specifically state the reason why Teena cross-dressed was due to mental and emotional trauma from her earlier being molested by a man while she was very young, and the latter for claiming that &amp;quot;Teena&amp;quot; was in fact male when thanking Teena).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/film/2000/mar/29/oscars2000.oscars&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,533,945&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Breakfast Club]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|What masquerades as a drama comparing the similar personalities of five seemingly very different teenagers in school detention really promotes the use of drugs, smoking, and extramarital sex. Although it does contain the conservative quote &amp;quot;You ought to spend a little more time trying to make something of yourself and a little less time trying to impress people&amp;quot;, it is said by the main villain of the movie, the high school principal.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,525,171&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Bridges of Madison County''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie starring liberal and atheist actress [[Meryl Streep]] about a disloyal wife who instead wants to have a Christian burial beside her husband, she decided that she wants to be [[Cremation|cremated]] in honor of her lover that she cheated on her husband with.&lt;br /&gt;
|$22 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R (Should be NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|This nauseating &amp;quot;romance&amp;quot; film proves that [[liberals]] will [[shoehorning|shoehorn]] the homosexual agenda into anything, even Westerns. It was also an early example of production companies dictating to distributors what they should distribute at the local level, often against the distributor's own decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$83,043,761&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bros''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|R &lt;br /&gt;
|An alleged &amp;quot;romantic comedy&amp;quot; which is actually another attempt to blatantly put the homosexual agenda on display, featuring an entirely LGBTQ cast.  When the movie flopped at the box office (making back only $4.9 million on its opening weekend despite a $22 million budget for the film) because of its content despite being heavily promoted by celebrities, homosexual advocates and liberal media outlets, Billy Eichner, who starred in the movie, also co-wrote the script and is himself openly homosexual and a Democrat supporter, lashed out at the public for refusing to see the movie, accusing them of &amp;quot;homophobia&amp;quot; while engaging in [[heterophobia]] himself, which only resulted in a massive social media backlash against Eichner in response.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,900,000&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Brothers Grimsby''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This vulgar film is loaded with sex jokes, sex scenes, nudity, one graphic elephant sex scene, and a joke about Donald Trump getting AIDS. Luckily, it was a box office bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2016/03/14/box-office-brothers-grimsby-flopped-because-it-didnt-look-good/#4a36b6f749d7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$6,874,837&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''But I'm a Cheerleader'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A lesbian [[public school]] [[cheerleading|cheerleader]] is attracted to other cheerleaders, portraying [[homosexuality]] as a legitimate lifestyle. The film attacks and ridicules [[reparative therapy]] and religious people, and it normalizes lesbians by depicting the star as a girly cheerleader, obviously a forced subversion of the lesbian archetype.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,205,627&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Caligula''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|UR (should be NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|This historical drama about the infamous Roman emperor of the same name has been considered the most pornographic movie ever made, which led to it being a critical failure. It has unsimulated scenes of oral and anal sex, incest, and close-ups of the genitalia of both sexes, along with brutal violence. Upon its release, several U.S. cities tried to prevent the movie from being shown, though liberal courts repeatedly affirmed that it met the Miller test (finding it not obscene enough to be banned). Some lawyers defending it even lamented that it helped to form a conservative morality, which may have helped Ronald Reagan win the 1980 presidential election.&lt;br /&gt;
|$23 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Call Me By Your Name''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The ''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' of 2017, only this time pedophilia, in addition to homosexuality, is endorsed and displayed as &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Captain Marvel''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the eponymous Marvel Comics superheroine (although the original incarnation of the Marvel character in the comics was a male alien superhero, not to be confused with the older Captain Marvel aka Shazam from DC Comics) and set in 1995, the twenty-first installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe follows Carol Danvers as she becomes Captain Marvel after Earth is caught in the center of a galactic conflict between two alien civilizations. In contrast to the rest of the film series up to this point, ''Captain Marvel'' is explicitly feminist, one example showing a deleted scene with Captain Marvel threatening a man for mild flirts, including &amp;quot;Smile for me&amp;quot; and stealing his belongings. During an interview, Captain Marvel's actress Brie Larson shows some sexism, [[ageism]], and self-loathing [[racism]] by saying that she &amp;quot;won't accept reviews about the movie from 40-year-old white men&amp;quot; (even though she is herself white). The film was also notorious for Disney and Marvel going to extremes to ensure it had any chance at a box office success, including forcing theaters to make it the single showing for a week, buying tickets and lying on the importance of the film to understand ''[[Avengers: Endgame]]'' released the same year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/some-reports-indicate-captain-marvel-is-the-only-movie-playing-at-some-theaters-during-premiere-week/78446/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/KBeUffaNxkY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://cosmicbook.news/disney-manipulated-captain-marvel-perception&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://boundingintocomics.com/2019/03/13/new-reports-of-empty-theaters-at-captain-marvel-add-to-movies-controversy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as well as having Rotten Tomatoes remove its negative reviews of the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/rotten-tomatoes-removes-thousands-of-negative-captain-marvel-user-ratings/79348/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/02/captain-marvel-rotten-tomatoes-censorship-circumvented-thanks-to-dissenter-extension/78084/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.128 billion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Cat in the Hat''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|This bastardization of an instantly recognizable children's classic, filled with adult humor and pandered to focus groups, is the reason why Dr. Seuss's widow has banned any live-action adaptations of Seuss's works. It won a one-time Golden Raspberry (or &amp;quot;Razzie&amp;quot;) Award for &amp;quot;Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie (All Concept/No Content)&amp;quot; and was nominated for eight other Razzies. It is from the same screenwriters of ''EuroTrip'', a 2004 raunchy and blasphemous comedy film also made by DreamWorks.&lt;br /&gt;
|$$55 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Challengers''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-18&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie promotes promiscuous and perverse homosexual affairs between married couples.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,569,268 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chappie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another &amp;quot;social&amp;quot; science fiction film that just abuses our [[First Amendment|first amendment right]] to bash capitalism. Neill Blomkamp also directed liberal films District 9 and Elysium too. On an optimistic note, the film got bad reviews (even from liberal critics)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/chappie/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the film did poorly in America (70% of its gross came from overseas).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=chappie.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,569,268 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cheaper by the Dozen 3&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|This third installment of the franchise clearly shows 20th Century Fox's ownership by Disney, as it departs from the family friendliness of the original and the 1st sequel in that it has several sex scenes, plus it pushes race-baiting.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chuck &amp;amp; Buck''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Debauched independent film about a man who revisits another man he traumatized through sexual grooming as a child. The message is that in some instances, groomers are the real victims and greatly misunderstood because of their need for casual sex. Also, if their victims weren't &amp;quot;brainwashed&amp;quot; by moralistic views about sex, most of them would consent to it and see it as a good thing, and no trauma would ever happen. In the film, when he meets the man he seduced in their youth, he encourages him to cheat on his wife, who is &amp;quot;holding him back&amp;quot;, and have sex with him in order to desensitize him to hedonism and see monogamy as a perversion. The director and writer of the film is openly bisexual, and plays the role of the groomer who initiates the encounter. He admits it is based on his experiences and fantasies.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Cider House Rules''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies [[abortion]] and advocates &amp;quot;[[pro-choice]]&amp;quot; values to a fault.&lt;br /&gt;
|$57,545,092&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''[[City of Ember]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Currently the once-in-a-lifetime adaptation.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Clerks]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with constant vulgar [[profanity]]. Previously rated NC-17, then appealed for an R rating.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,151,130&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Clerks 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sequel to the liberal comedy, filled with more profanity and even more disgusting acts that would not have been in the budget of the original film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,148,068&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Cosmic Slop]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|HBO trilogy focusing on minority science fiction. The main claim to fame was an adaptation of ''[[The Space Traders]]'', a race-baiting short story written by the infamous leftist race-baiter Derrick Bell.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cradle 2 the Grave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|MPAA&lt;br /&gt;
|At first your typical buddy cop movie with lots of explosions, shootings and hand-to-hand combats with a global threat and conspiracy and the kidnapping of the child of one of the protagonists as central parts to the plot. However, there's a creepy and disturbing particular element that says it is &amp;quot;aged badly&amp;quot; since its very release would be a gigantic euphemism. To start a conversation, Agent Su asks Anthony if his 8, almost 9-year-old, daughter already has a &amp;quot;little boyfriend&amp;quot;, and Anthony replies with a straight &amp;quot;never&amp;quot; and that he would &amp;quot;kill them&amp;quot;, therefore admitting with creepy and disturbing nonchalance in the presence of a cop that he would commit literal child murder. This is also a creepy potential sign of a future abusive father, and it's quite likely how liberals viewed and view conservative or traditional fathers.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34,657,731&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cuck''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the title, it mocks conservative values and paints conservatives and alt-right people as lunatics. Is also notorious for being released to a box office of $0.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2020/04/cuck-movie-gets-woke-goes-broke-at-box-office/106756/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cuties''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This depraved French movie shamelessly sexualizes pre-pubescent girls and has them dancing and twerking in sexually suggestive ways that no respectable '''adult woman''' would be seen doing. When asked if they supported [[pedophilia]], producers at Netflix responded that they respected all religions, as if they really believed that pedophilia is actually a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dallas Buyers Club''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Egregiously supports the homosexual agenda during its deadly-years [[AIDS]] epidemic.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,298,285&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Danish Girl''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|One of the definitive pro-homosexual/gender confusion propaganda films. Eddie Redmayne portrays Einar Wegener, a landscape artist who stands in for a female model who no-shows for a painting planned by Wegener's wife, Gerda. Einar, who has undergone gender confusion for years, snaps as a result of the modeling sessions where he stands in as &amp;quot;female&amp;quot; and he begins claiming to be a &amp;quot;woman&amp;quot; calling himself &amp;quot;Lili Elbe&amp;quot;, which nearly leads to him being committed to an asylum. Einar later undergoes surgical mutilation to accommodate his delusion, but he dies of infection due to the mutilation.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,114,018&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Day After''&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Attacks the military and conservative politicians, and encourages negotiation with Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Day After Tomorrow'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Overdramatic, nonsensical portrayal of the consequences of fictional &amp;quot;[[climate change]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$186,740,799&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Day of the Animals''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|PG &lt;br /&gt;
|Environmentalist propaganda that states &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; turns woodland animals into psychotic human-hunters. It also claims that humans must get what they deserve (which they do not).&lt;br /&gt;
|$2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Dazed and Confused''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This coming-of-age film circa 1976, attempts to normalize [[promiscuity]] and [[drug abuse]] among teenagers and young adults.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,993,039&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dirty Grandpa''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor family values, a soon-to be groom, takes his recently widowed grandfather on a road trip, he eventually leaves his finance, and ends up with a hippie instead. Drug usage is present, and clearly pro-LGBT, with a supporting character being gay.&lt;br /&gt;
|$35,593,113&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''District 9''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Alien invaders are shown sympathetically, but the military, corporations, and humans in general are not.&lt;br /&gt;
|$115,646,235&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Don’t Breathe''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie's protagonists are three burglars who break into homes (secured by one of their father’s security company) to steal items to sell. The &amp;quot;villain&amp;quot; of the movie is a blind army veteran, and the homeowner of the house they are breaking into. Although they do find that he has kidnapped the girl who killed his daughter in a car accident. Also, feminism is present with the leader of the thieves being a girl.&lt;br /&gt;
|$89,217,875&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Don't Worry Darling''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This movie was directed and produced by feminist and misandrist Olivia Wilde. The movie demonizes patriarchy and especially white men. The movie received a low approval rating from even from notoriously biased [[Rotten Tomatoes]] and didn't receive earnings as producers expected.&lt;br /&gt;
|35$ Million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Doom''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the video game that influenced the [[Columbine High School massacre|Columbine High School massacre]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20060223025846/columbine.free2host.net/quotes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, ll the military characters (except one) are corrupt. Fans of the game criticized it for not including much monster-themed action.&lt;br /&gt;
|$28,212,337&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Drag Me to Hell''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite being made by known Republican&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whatculture.com/offbeat/10-celebs-you-wouldnt-expect-to-be-republicans?page=4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sam Raimi, the film's premise dealt with a woman being condemned simply for doing what her job required her to do at the bank, with Raimi also implicitly stating that the gypsy who cursed her had sympathetic reasons for cursing the main protagonist despite the fact that she herself had explicitly foresaken paying mortgage three times. In addition, the means to counteract the Lamia (the creature responsible for sending people to Hell when cursed) were more explicitly Pagan than Christian.&lt;br /&gt;
|$90.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Easy Rider''&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This slice-of-life drama follows two drug-addicted motorcyclists who glorify every aspect of the hippie lifestyle. Conservatives are incorrectly portrayed and generalized as racist rednecks.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Elysium''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This propaganda piece criticizes big business and supports [[illegal immigration]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$93,050,117&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Emilia Perez''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|It's a musical film about a [[Mexican drug cartel]] member who becomes trans that includes a creepy musical number about sex change surgery. Despite failing miserably in box office, The movie was nominated for 13 awards by liberal Academy awards. The movie budget was $26 million and got only $15.4 million on box office, around 12$ million deficit.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fantastic Four'' (2015 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based very loosely on the comics of the same name and deprived of the source material's humor, the film portrays the military in a negative manner. Here, they only want to use superpowered teens as weapons. On top of that, they also changed the race of the Human Torch and his father for political correctness/cultural Marxism reasons. The film was also infamous for its controversial behind-the-scenes history. The studio executives mandated reshoots without the director's knowledge of this and the final cut was gutted in the editing room. Director Josh Trank was so angered by this that he completely disowned the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/josh-trank-disowns-fantastic-four-via-twitter-claims-studio-interference-322&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 2005 film featuring [[Jessica Alba]], which is more conservative is looked in a retroactively positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,117,548 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fast Food Nation''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite Bruce Willis is in it, and the title the film attacks [[capitalism]] and [[Fast food|fast food]] in general while pushing [[environmentalism]], veganism, [[illegal immigration]], and extramarital sex.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,005,539&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Fast Times at Ridgemont High''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film glorifies [[drug abuse]], premarital sex, and [[abortion]]. It was also one of [[Sean Penn]]'s early film roles as he would go on to star in more liberal propaganda films. The abortion scene is heavily edited out-of-context by sugarcoating the reality that it's gory and actually putting the mother's life at risk. In the follow-up scene, Stacy Hamilton's more conservative-minded brother Brad fortunately confronts her about it.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,092,880   &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Female Trouble''&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|This atrocious movie is made from the same director of ''Pink Flamingos'', starring an overweight delinquent student named Dawn Davenport (played by transvestite Divine) who abandons her family and starts a life of crime. Crime is glorified and embraced, for Dawn decides to start causing crime as a way to get famous, and she even shows no remorse for her actions while she is electrocuted at the end of the movie, thanking her fans for helping her gain infamy. Abuse is also glorified, from Dawn's contempt for her parents to refusing to let her daughter Taffy be a normal girl, beating her harshly and even threatening to kill her for joining Hare Krishna (and eventually does). When Taffy later meets her father who abandoned the family, he sexually harasses her, pushing an incest vibe as well. The movie also pushes the homosexual agenda, where one woman urges a man to become gay because she thinks of heterosexuality as boring, and it shows two close-up shots of male genitalia as well. Like with ''Pink Flamingos'', this movie got a positive reception from a rather morality-deprived audience.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fifty Shades of Grey''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Sexual explicit and porn movie that normalize [[BDSM]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$40 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''A Fish Called Wanda'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The protagonists are criminals, thieves, and liars. One character even tires to kill an elderly lady, as her being the only witness to the robbery. Also promotes infidelity, with the lawyer having an affair with one of the criminals and leaving his wife and daughter.&lt;br /&gt;
|$62,493,712&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Forest''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the Aokigahara Forest in [[Japan]] as a scary place filled with vengeful ghosts. In reality, it is a sad place where people go to commit suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Fourth Kind''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Uses the real-life tragedies of deceased and missing citizens of Nome, Alaska to make money with a fictitious story about alien abductions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47,709,193&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Freddy Got Fingered''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains a lot of crude and revolting gross-out sexual humor, including a scene where the main character actually makes a horse [censored]. Uses shock tactics in much the same way that ''[[Family Guy]]'' does. Won five Razzie awards, including Worst Picture and four awards (Worst Actor, Worst Director, Worst Screenplay and Worst Screen Couple) for star and director, Canadian &amp;quot;comedian&amp;quot; Tom Green.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Get Out''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This racist horror comedy-drama follows an African American man who discovers to his shock that his white American girlfriend's parents transplant the brains of white Americans into the bodies of African Americans as if to strip their victims of African American cultural identity. It presents a false dichotomy between black and white culture and discourages American ideals such as interracial and intercultural integration, all while accusing white Americans of wanting to eliminate instead of integrating all racial subcultures in the nation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ghostbusters'' (2016 reboot)&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This staunchly feminist remake of the conservative horror comedy classic replaces all the original male heroes with women who appear to have only vaguely different personalities, and every male character is either unintelligent or mean-spirited. Racism and sexual innuendoes are present as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7ikR-6uSMYz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also the remake also replaces the [[EPA]] with [[United States Department of Homeland Security|Homeland Security]] as the bad guys. Luckily, no one other than the world's most biased liberal critics liked it, as its trailer was known for being the most hated of its kind on YouTube.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://screencrush.com/ghostbusters-trailer-most-disliked-movie-trailer-in-history/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sony was caught making fake reviews&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXv3w59raZ4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the film flopped at the box office &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.imdb.com/news/ni60138331?fb_comment_id=1146766692061206_1146942958710246&amp;amp;comment_id=1146942958710246&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; so tremendously that Sony Pictures Entertainment lost over $70 million.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,049,002 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Gladiator 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|While the 2000 ''[[Gladiator]]'' film portrayed masculinity positively, this 2024 sequel treats it as a bad joke. Lucius - son of Maximus and Lucilla - is introduced in this movie being scolded by his wife for being slightly too aggressive while plowing the fields. Said wife is treated as a more superior soldier compared to her husband, and when she gets killed in battle, Lucius is blamed for letting her fight at all. General Acacius is also shown being ashamed of winning a battle in the Colosseum, which shows that the movie is mocking strength and victory as &amp;quot;problematic&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34 million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Glen or Glenda''&lt;br /&gt;
|1953&lt;br /&gt;
|Not rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Created by Ed Wood and widely regarded as one of the worst directors of all time, it celebrates cross-dressing and transsexualism.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Godzilla'' (1998 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal and homosexual director Roland Emmerich turns Godzilla into a girl and enforces the idea that military does more damage than Godzilla. The film even fails to address the original message of the original 1954 Japanese film (the first ''Godzilla'' was created in response to fears of the aftermath of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II), with the resulting film likewise being hated by Godzilla fans and by Toho Films, to the extent that the &amp;quot;Godzilla&amp;quot; in this film when later appearing in the mainline films was given a separate identity to the mainstream Godzilla and beaten easily. Liberals also panned the film, particularly a running gag in which the Mayor of New York cast a &amp;quot;thumbs up and thumbs down&amp;quot; vote as an unsubtle jab at Siskel and Ebert.&lt;br /&gt;
|$136,314,294&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Good Will Hunting]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Left-wing actors/writers [[Matt Damon]] and [[Ben Affleck]] created this coming-of-age film that is the main reason why [[Howard Zinn]]'s anti-American revisionist textbook ''A People's History of the United States'' became both public knowledge and provided in all universities and high schools across America. Matt Damon's character, Will Hunting, tells [[Robin William]]'s character in a pivotal scene, &amp;quot;You wanna read a ''real'' history book? Read Howard Zinn’s ''People’s History of the United States''. That book’ll f*****’ knock you on your a**.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/5/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$225,933,435 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Gringo''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This movie egregiously promotes pot smoking. In addition, the main male character is extremely feminine, which suits Hollywood's stance on the traditional gender roles. This movie didn't even make the Top 10 its opening weekend, despite heavy marketing.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hair''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the Broadway musical, the film's profanity, its depiction of the use of illegal drugs, its treatment of sexuality, its irreverence for the American flag, and its gratuitous nudity caused much comment and controversy, as it did when the stage musical first premiered in 1967. A product of the hippie counterculture and the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the group produced several songs that became anthems of the anti-Vietnam War peace movement.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,284,643&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hairspray''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor [[moral]]s shown, encourages homosexual agenda, bad behavior, such as smoking, drinking, cursing. Many sexual comments are shown. It portrays conservatives as segregationists and those with high expectations in a negative viewpoint. &lt;br /&gt;
|$118,871,849&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Happening''&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A pornographic French movie that exists solely to celebrate abortion.  It also wants you to believe that should abortion become illegal, the crime rate will go up.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,600,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The adventures of two pot-smokers who play up ethnic stereotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,250,550&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hocus Pocus 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This sequel to the great conservative 1993 film ''Hocus Pocus'' takes place 29 years after the original movie. It of course stars leftist actress Bette Middler (who also played Winifred from the first movie), and it features rants against the &amp;quot;patriarchy&amp;quot;. In spite of the Sanderson Sisters clearly meant to be evil child-murderers unrepentant of their crime, the movie tries to make them redeemable, thus showing [[moral relativism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Horrible Bosses''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Three men try to kill their bosses. Two of the three bosses are wealthy businessmen. The film is also filled with offensive language and many sexual references. Was followed by a sequel that however supported the American Dream and capitalism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$117,538,559&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Hottie and the Nottie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (should be R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Ultra-liberal actress [[Paris Hilton]] stars in this movie that glorifies every aspect of the &amp;quot;bimbo&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;dumb blonde&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;valley girl&amp;quot; lifestyles (all of which Hilton herself has embraced over time as part of her public persona) and contains demeaning depictions against those with dark hair and dark eyes, calling them &amp;quot;unattractive&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,696&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The House That Jack Built''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R (should be NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|According to director Lars von Trier, this ultra-violent and sadistic serial killer film is meant to be seen as an analogy for [[Donald Trump]] (or as von Trier insultingly refers to him as &amp;quot;Homo Trumpus&amp;quot;) and his administration. This is a gruesome and vicious movie that glamorizes the murder of women and children - calling it a form of art. It relies heavily on Satanic imagery and Nazi iconography purely to shock and offend. Even most liberals were turned off by this movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Howl''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film about homosexual poet and [[beatnik]]-turned-[[hippie]], [[Allen Ginsberg]].  Promotes the [[homosexual agenda]] and the idea that writing about [[pornography]] is &amp;quot;protected&amp;quot; under the [[First Amendment]] and has &amp;quot;literary value&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$617,334&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''I Love You Phillip Morris''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A homosexuality-themed comedy-drama film about a homosexual inmate who escapes to reunite with his lover.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,037,459&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This final entry in the ''Indiana Jones'' movie series is also a major slap in the face of Indiana Jones, putting him down in favor of his goddaughter. Said goddaughter also justifies stealing an artifact that Indiana has taken by claiming &amp;quot;It's called capitalism&amp;quot;. When Indiana mentions bravely fighting the Nazis, she disrespectfully attacks him for &amp;quot;occupying stolen land&amp;quot; from Native Americans, despite the two subjects are totally unrelated.&lt;br /&gt;
|$&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''It's Pat''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Gender confused movie about the titular character. The film tanked in the box office &lt;br /&gt;
|$60,822&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Jackass]]: The Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Essentially a montage of ridiculous stunts and pranks with no coherent story.&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,255,312 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jeanne Dielman''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Woke liberals defiled the once respected Sight &amp;amp; Sound magazine's Greatest Films of All Time by manufacturing this to be considered the &amp;quot;greatest film of all time&amp;quot;.  In actuality, it's unwatchable feminist nonsense that appeals to nobody but delusional smug woke moralists who think that films directed by lesbians are inherently better.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Jennifer's Body]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This film starring [[Megan Fox]] and [[Amanda Seyfried]] promotes feminism and glorifies [[Satanism]], and contains a lesbian kiss and them making out. It was a victim of Liberal false advertising that promised audiences it would be anti-feminist. Even [[Chris Pratt]], who had a minor role as a police officer, couldn’t save the film. It gained a cult following among Liberals and those who believe in the homosexual agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,204,793.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Unfortunately, Christian movie star, Chris Pratt, cannot save this film from being a liberal disaster. This film, like its predecessor, &amp;quot;Jurassic World,&amp;quot; is also very supportive of feminism. In fact, that is even more apparent, as Chris Pratt's character - Owen Grady - is depicted as heartless for not wanting to save the dinosaurs and preferring to be left alone; on the flip side, the more feminist Claire Dearing is now a dinosaur rights activist, using Owen's ''Velociraptor'' Blue to get Owen to save the dinosaurs with her. At the end of the film, the dinosaurs are released into the wild, putting billions of human lives in danger and clearly conveying an environmental message. Also, one of the younger characters clearly looks like an SJW, with her character acting as such. Not only that, but one of the main antagonists calls her a &amp;quot;nasty woman,&amp;quot; which is clearly a jab at Donald Trump. According to one of the actresses, Daniella Pineda, there was intended to be a scene (that was fortunately cut) that revealed that her character, Zia Rodriguez, was a lesbian when admitting she was fond of Chris Pratt's character.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-star-daniella-pinedas-lesbian-reveal-cut-film-183618705.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$417,719,760&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kangaroo Jack''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|Don’t let the trailers, posters and title fool you. The film isn’t about a rapping and talking kangaroo. He only appears in 7 minutes of the whole film, making this a big case of Liberal false advertising. Also, it was originally going to be an R-rated mob comedy called Down and Under, but it was retooled because the test audiences liked the kangaroo. The main hero played by Jerry O’Connell grabs a woman’s breasts and is the stepson of a mob leader played by Christopher Walken. Luckily, it had a more family friendly animated sequel with more of the titular kangaroo in 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
|$88,929,111&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kids'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Pornographic film concerning five rebellious underage teenagers in [[New York City]] engaging in graphic sex, violent acts, [[drug]]/[[alcohol]] use, and spreading [[HIV]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,412,216&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Kids Are All Right'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays homosexuality and homosexual parenting as a &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,811,365&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Laramie Project]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|An adaptation of the play of the same name made by HBO to promote the homosexual agenda, including giving a one-sided, extremely biased perspective on the murder of Matthew Shepherd, implying that his murderers had &amp;quot;homophobia&amp;quot; as a motive. It also has a significant anti-religious bent in it, where two of the documentarists (implied to be homosexual) tried to talk to a priest specifically to &amp;quot;piss him off,&amp;quot; and also had one of the members breaking down from a priest being &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot; simply because he implied the possibility that Matthew Shepherd would go to hell if he didn't repent for his homosexual activities.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Legally Blonde 2: Red, White and Blonde''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the patriotic-sounding title (&amp;quot;Red, White, and Blonde&amp;quot;) fool you. It is significantly more left-wing, including promotion of animal rights (the main court case involved condemning animal testing) and also included a homosexual joke involving Elle Woods' pet chihuahua (despite the original film implying that said dog, who was male, was infatuated by the Taco Bell chihuahua mascot, a female).&lt;br /&gt;
|$124.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Léon: The Professional''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgusting film that features an assassin taking an orphan under his wing (even worse, her family shows poor values and are nasty to each other). He then trains her to be an assassin herself to kill the corrupt [[DEA]] responsible for her parents' murder, but also the assassin who's much older than her seems to be [[Pedophilia|romanticized by her]] (in a deleted scene they even have sex).&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,501,238&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|''Lethal Weapon 3''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-gun control propaganda disguised as a buddy cop action film. &lt;br /&gt;
|$144,731,527&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lethal Weapon 4''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The sequel now has a pro-illegal immigration message.&lt;br /&gt;
|$130,444,603&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Little Mermaid'' (live-action remake)&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Race-swapped live-action version of the 1989 animated counterpart and classic of the same name. Case in point, with Disney changing Howard Ashman's original lyrics to suit more &amp;quot;modern times&amp;quot; as described by the &amp;quot;woke&amp;quot; social media minority in the English-speaking West, as well as many of the accomplishments done by the side characters given to Ariel for female empowerment. Many of the men were portrayed as either useless idiots, or evil with Prince Eric (who is now adopted) not being the one who killed Ursula, and that King Triton probably had multiple wives or lovers judging all of his daughters are of different races, at least this would be a rational explanation because it would be absurd even for a Disney movie to imagine having multiple daughters of different races with only a wife or lover. One of the background mermen is even cast by a pornstar, further questioning Disney's already-questionable casting choices. Also, Grimsby's attitude towards Eric being with Ariel is more [[Pragmatism|pragmatic]] rather than [[Idealism|idealistic]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was a major flop at the box office that failed even to break even, and liberals blamed racism due to Ariel now being black despite the original story being Danish, another piece of evidence of liberal and woke hypocrisy and anti-European and anti-redhead racism and bigotry. Cinema workers and [[YouTube]]/[[Tik Tok]] creators denounced a lack of spectators in the theaters for the film, with also videos showing the evidence of that, leading to assume that Disney or corporate bots on social media tried to illegally inflate the box office in order to promote the film and misleading the public, like it happened with the ''Captain Marvel'' movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|$250 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lost World: Jurassic Park''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The film is pro-environmentalist and features John Hammond, the original head of Jurassic Park, hiring environmentalist hippies to sabotage his own company in the name of releasing the dinosaurs back into the wild, with the protagonists being depicted as being in the right despite causing explicit destruction and death via their actions, as well as demonizing the corporation for trying to stop them. Also has an anti-hunting message, as one of the main antagonists is explicitly a hunter; adding to that, one of the &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot; removes bullets from the hunter's gun, putting everyone in even more danger from the dinosaurs, though no one calls him out for it. It is to be noted that such a message not only was not present in the book it was adapted from, but it was, if anything, the complete antithesis to the anti-cloning message from both the original book by Michael Crichton and the 1993 film that adapted it, and that ''Lost World'' acted as a sequel to.&lt;br /&gt;
|$618.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Love Lies Bleeding''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie that promotes lesbian relationships failed miserably and didn't cross $12 million at the box office despite huge casting such as feminist and homo actress Kristen Stewart, Ed Harris, Jena Malone, and Dave Franco.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Machete''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Open borders propaganda about illegals crossing the southern border. Southerners are portrayed as slack-jawed racists. Robert De Niro plays a corrupt Texas senator and Don Johnson plays the racist leader of a vigilante border group.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26,593,646&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Madame Web''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Another feminist superhero movie which ended as huge failure to producers when box office didnt cross 100$ million.&lt;br /&gt;
|80$ million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Mad Max: Fury Road''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Feminist propaganda that endorses and celebrates anarchy. Also, it bears some &amp;quot;[[Plagiarism|similarities]]&amp;quot; to the John Wayne classic ''Stagecoach''. The fourth movie in the ''Mad Max'' film series, first made famous by Mel Gibson in the title role, was released between 1979 and 1985.&lt;br /&gt;
|$153,636,354&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Maleficent''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Apparently represents the idea of revising the ''Sleeping Beauty'' story to focus on a lesbian relationship; although Aurora clearly loves Maleficent as a mother figure, Maleficent takes over the role of the prince and is revealed to be the person whose kiss of &amp;quot;true love&amp;quot; (given on the forehead) really saved Aurora. Revisionist piece which unabashedly promotes the feminist agenda to the extent that most of the males are either villains or useless, even going so far as to heavily hint at a transgender philosophy; promotes hard-core environmentalism, [[moral relativism]], and even Marxism; pretty much ruins the morality tale for ''Sleeping Beauty''. ''The Federalist'' also had a field day with the film stating how it promoted the leftist agenda and citing point by point its agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/06/maleficent-once-upon-a-screed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In particular, King Stefan, far from being depicted as a good father who gave up Aurora to the three fairies to protect her from the curse, was shown not to care for Aurora at all and was willing to let her die from the curse.&lt;br /&gt;
|$241,410,378&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Marat/Sade''&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Inmates in a French insane asylum in 1808 put on a play about [[French Revolution]] figure [[Jean-Paul Marat]], directed by the [[Marquis de Sade]], that devolves into a violent orgy of destruction at the end of the movie.  Basically nothing more than a celebration of violence and nihilism, yet it is lauded by liberal movie critics.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't be fooled by the fact that Hollywood conservative [[Clint Eastwood]] directed this film or that it both takes place and was filmed in the overall conservative city of Savannah, Georgia. It is based on the equally bad nonfiction book of the same name and features LGBT, environmentalist, witchcraft, and anti-capitalist themes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,105,255&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Moonlight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A coming-of-age film that glorifies drug use and [[homosexuality]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,557,396 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=moonlight2016.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Mortal Engines (film)|Mortal Engines]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This USA-New Zealand co-production pushes the feminist propaganda that endorses and celebrates anarchy. Also, it bears some &amp;quot;[[Plagiarism|similarities]]&amp;quot; to many classics, including ''[[Star Wars]]'' and ''[[Total Recall (2012 film)|Total Recall]]''. It presents some message underlying &amp;quot;[[climate change]]&amp;quot;. Currently, the once-in-a-lifetime adaptation of the [[Mortal Engines Quartet|novel series]] of the same name by [[Philip Reeve]] is due to leftist narratives painting the film in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Movie 43''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anthology of short &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; films which glamorize virtually every form of deviant sexuality imaginable. Much of the &amp;quot;humor&amp;quot; is scatological, including a scene with a character who enjoys being defecated upon. Aside from that, ''Movie 43'' is literally one of the worst motion pictures ever made in history, as it has nothing that would make it good, imaginative, funny, charming, or understandable of its existence at all. Won three Razzie awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director (all directors) and Worst Screenplay (all screenwriters).&lt;br /&gt;
|$32.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mulholland Drive''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The makers of this nonsensical art film think homosexuality and fornication in general are &amp;quot;sexy&amp;quot; societal norms.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,220,243&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''My Own Private Idaho''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Two homosexual street hustlers begin having an affair while seeking adventure en route to Idaho and then Italy. One of the more infamous cinematic examples of the homosexual agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|$6,401,336	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Natural Born Killers'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Riddled with violence, drug abuse and sexual references, this movie's main characters are brutal serial killers who are viewed as &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot;. Infamously known for influencing Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold for committing the massacre at [[Columbine High School massacre]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-columbine-shooters/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
|$50,282,766&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Normal Heart''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|TV MA&lt;br /&gt;
|Another [[homosexual agenda|homosexual propaganda]] film that criticizes the [[Reagan Administration]] and general Conservative ideology.  The LGBT community was a strong promoter of this film and insists it is &amp;quot;artful&amp;quot;, when really it is decadent. &lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''No Hard Feelings''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG18&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie starred and produced by feminist and liberal Jennifer Lawrence. The movie showed a parents ruined life over their son to be with promiscuous woman. Despite the huge budget but the movie didnt get success.&lt;br /&gt;
|$45 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Nymphomaniac'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This two-part movie features four hours of non-stop sex and glamorizes the lifestyle of the titular sex addict.  It portrays other [[San Francisco values]], such as homosexuality and S&amp;amp;M, in a positive light. In general, this film was labeled as NSFW. Director Lars von Trier is known for being anti-American and slightly hints at this throughout the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$17,584,083&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ocean's 8''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A feminist woke movie; all the casting was composed of feminist actresses. The movie didn't get the success as expected, and instead of blaming themselves or the direction of the movie, the feminist cast blamed the public and &amp;quot;patriarchy&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$70 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Odd Life of Timothy Green''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite an overly schmaltzy pro-family sentiment, this film showcases terrible parenting.&lt;br /&gt;
|$55.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''One Sings, The Other Doesn't''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|A disgusting French film that exists solely to promote abortion and normalize it as an essential part of being female.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Organizer''&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|This Italian film supports [[trade union]]s and [[infidelity]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Orgazmo'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|This pornographic nightmare celebrates the porn industry and criticizes [[Mormon]]s, if not all the world's religiously devout. It doesn’t help that it is from the creators of [[South Park]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$602,302 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Parasite'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This Korean film inexplicably won Best Picture at the Academy Awards, even though it has a highly anti-capitalist message and portrays wealth as evil.&lt;br /&gt;
|$167,600,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Paul'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This extraterrestrial rescue mission could have been a harmless comedic tribute to the science fiction film genre if it didn't portray Christians and the military as close-minded idiots while depicting atheists (played by godless writers and co-stars Simon Pegg and Nick Frost) who support extramarital sex, homosexuality, and mind-altering drug use as the only &amp;quot;sensible&amp;quot; people. Pegg and Frost have explicitly stated that one of the movie's main messages is that &amp;quot;there is no God&amp;quot; and anyone who believes in Him is &amp;quot;an ignorant boob&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37,412,945&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Perks of Being a Wallflower''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes homosexuality and also demonizes those opposed to a homosexual lifestyle. &lt;br /&gt;
|$17,738,570&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The People vs. Larry Flynt'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Idealizes [[pornography]] mogul [[Larry Flynt]] and claims that pornography is &amp;quot;protected&amp;quot; by the [[First Amendment]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,300,385&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Peter Pan and Wendy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG	&lt;br /&gt;
|An extremely awful and [[woke]] version of the 1953 animated film, starting with the race-swapping of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, as well as the race- and gender-swapping of some of the Lost Boys. Strong [[feminism]], with Wendy not having any maternal instincts, instead fighting Captain Hook. Tiger Lily - who was previously portrayed as a damsel in distress - is now portrayed as a warrior. None of the girls in the movie compete with each other for Peter Pan’s affections as they did in the original; in fact, Wendy even slaps Peter Pan at one point. The mermaids are completely downgraded, barely even appearing in the film. There is nothing childlike about this film; it was not vibrantly colorful, like the original film. Actually Great conservative film Peter Pan (2003) has more in common with the original film, despite not even being a Disney film.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Philadelphia''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Homosexual agenda-setting drama.&lt;br /&gt;
|$77,446,440&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pineapple Express'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows [[drug abuse]] to be &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$87,341,380&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pink Flamingos''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Embraces horrifying people, who engage in such acts as [[incest]] and [[bestiality]], as well as promoting the homosexual agenda, since it stars transvestite Divine and shows homosexuals in a positive light.  This film has toilet humor, finding it funny when a character (Divine) literally eats poo, and extremely offensive language; one character is even named after a racial slur against white people.  Characters promote anarchy and violence as an everyday thing.  A very graphic film, even for most liberals, showing close-ups of genitalia, unlike any non-pornographic film.  Liberals call it a &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot;, but it is revoltingly horrid and more like an act of [[Satan]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Poor Things''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie starring liberal Emma Stone is full of sex scenes that promote pedophile thoughts on women who have young girls' minds.&lt;br /&gt;
|$35 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Power of the Dog]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Scene after scene of pro-[[homosexuality]] allusions, under the guise of being a Western when there is really no Western content in the movie.  “Where’s the Western in this Western?” asked acclaimed actor Sam Elliott.  &amp;quot;There’s all these allusions of homosexuality throughout the movie,&amp;quot; he added.  &lt;br /&gt;
|Netflix&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Project X''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows teen drinking, [[drug]] use, sex, vulgar profanity, and anarchic behavior to be &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,731,865&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Prom''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on a 2018 Broadway show, the movie stars a bunch of celebrities from cities like Los Angeles arriving at a rural Indiana town, looking down on the locals for their &amp;quot;backward&amp;quot; ways. The movie is definitely pro-homosexuality, for the main character is seen as right in wanting to attend a dance with a female date, while the townsfolk are painted as bigoted against her because of this. Christianity is also demonized, for a group of Christians at the local mall are labeled as unemphatic because they wanted to follow the Bible and go to church. Middle America - as well as its [[small town values]] that it represents - is also mocked as being stupid and non-progressive, while the urban far-left celebrity lifestyle that the newcomers try to force onto the town is seen as in the right; the main character even sings about how superior living in a city like San Francisco is compared to rural Indiana.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Quills''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays the Marquis de Sade as the protagonist, with an emphasis on extremely violent acts.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,732,088&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rent'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes [[homosexuality]] and cross-dressing as &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; lifestyles. &lt;br /&gt;
|$29,077,547&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Resident Evil'' franchise&lt;br /&gt;
|2002-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R  &lt;br /&gt;
|Feminist film franchise with anti-capitalistic messages. Based on a video game franchise on the same name. The worst offender is ''Resident Evil: The Final Chapter'', where the villain is a [[Christian]] who releases a deadly virus (called the T-virus) which will destroy the human race and have him and rich colleagues rebuild the world in their image (a.k.a playing [[God]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|$244,443,938 (all together)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rise of the Planet of the Apes''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|In this adaptation of ''Planet of the Apes'', a chimpanzee named Caesar is born with a gift of intelligence. When sent to an abusive ape center, he rallies the apes into fighting against their captors in an escape for freedom. The movie appears to be anti-business (the company the main character works for is painted in an extremely negative light), a lot of environmentalism throughout (including a more anti-human agenda being pushed), and the actor who played Caesar, Andy Serkis, as well as director Rupert Wyatt, both compared Caesar positively to the Marxist Argentinian revolutionary terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]]. The movie got sequels in 2014 (''Dawn of the Planet of the Apes''), 2017 (''War for the Planet of the Apes''), and 2024 (''Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes'').&lt;br /&gt;
|$481,801,049&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rock of Ages''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (Director's Cut is rated R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the highly unoriginal and unimaginative Broadway musical, ''Rock of Ages'' features poor [[moral]]s, promotes the homosexual agenda, prostitution, drug use, and drinking, and portrays conservatives in a negative, offensively bigoted viewpoint. Many gratuitous sex scenes and sexual references are prominently shown.&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,518,613&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rocketman''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A biopic on [[Elton John]]. Mostly because of his influence, it has a gratuitous promotion of homosexuality and drug usage, and was particularly infamous for including an explicit sodomy scene.&lt;br /&gt;
|$195.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Salo: Or the 120 Days of Sodom''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Adaptation of the [[sadist]] and [[Libertine]] and atheistic text by [[Marquis de Sade]] from Communist homosexual filmmaker Pier Paolo Pasolini, who was killed shortly after completing this movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Scooby-Doo (film)|Scooby-Doo]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|A supposed live-action satire of the iconic Hanna-Barbera cartoon. Shaggy is heavily implied to be a stoner and is a vegetarian like his original voice actor, Casey Kassem. Velma is implied to be a lesbian, where deleted scenes make it more apparent. Daphne is now a blatant feminist, much like Sarah Michelle Gellar’s Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Fred can be a bit of a womanizer. There are plenty of raunchy innuendos, skimpy clothing among college-age women, glorifying the more decadent stereotype of Spring break, and strong language (including where Fred, possessed by a demon, says the word “b****h”). Pamela Anderson makes a cameo promoting environmentalism. The National Guard is portrayed as helpless. Written by [[James Gunn]], who would later write a more conservative and family-friendly sequel released in 2004. Gunn revealed in 2017 that an even more vulgar version of the film existed before the official movie did.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sex and the City''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Very disturbing film, much like its TV series counterpart, promoting the use of sex everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
|$152,647,258.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sex Tape''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-family. The main premise of the film was two nymphomaniacs trying to create a sex tape of themselves after getting their sex drive killed by their kids, and then recovering their iPods that accidentally uploaded their tape online for everyone to see. The ending also has a brief yet graphic sex scene showing what exactly was on the sex tape.&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,543,473&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Shack]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the novel of the same name, this film promotes the ancient heresy of Patripassionism, presents God the Father contrary to how he truly is according to scripture, and promotes the dangerous idea that God does not punish sin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.gotquestions.org/The-Shack-review.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$96,942,115&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shakespeare in Love''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals changing history in order to suit feminists. The film also suggests that a woman was responsible for William Shakespeare's work (even though there's no record of this at all). Although it won the Academy Award for Best Picture of 1998 (thanks to the aggressive campaign tactics of the egotistical producer Harvey Weinstein), the film has aged poorly and, to this day, the overwhelming majority of critics and film viewers believe that the conservative film and Steven Spielberg's masterpiece ''Saving Private Ryan'' should have won instead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SrNphaLsDs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$100,317,794&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Shape of Water''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgusting pro-Bestiality and Feminist movie directed by Marxist film director Guillermo del Toro. Also encourages homosexuality and has hints of promoting illegal immigration. &lt;br /&gt;
|$54,185,844&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''She Hate Me''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Taking jabs at capitalism and supporting the [[homosexual agenda]], this film has a very over the top plot were a man who's laid off from his job for exposing corrupt business practices, turns to impregnating wealthy lesbians for profit. (This really is the plot).&lt;br /&gt;
|$366,037&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Showgirls''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with explicit nudity, and promotes homosexuality as well as Hollywood values, as it glamorizes the Las Vegas showgirl and stripper lifestyle. MGM also, in an attempt to make it the next ''Rocky Horror Picture Show,'' ran a massive marketing campaign, including an audience-participation script, despite its rating. The film had notoriously terrible production values as well; despite MGM's efforts, the Razzie Awards gave it the &amp;quot;award&amp;quot; for worst film of 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sixteen Candles''&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Would be PG-13 today).&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies teenage sex, underage drinking, and cigarette smoking&lt;br /&gt;
|$23,686,027&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Small Soldiers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-military (due to the Commando Elite being depicted in a negative manner, and to a certain extent, GloboTech, the ones responsible for the bad events in the film, being stated to be a Defense Contractor) and also anti-Capitalist (due to GloboTech being the ones responsible for the events of the film, including buying out the Heartland Toy Company).&lt;br /&gt;
|$71.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Snow White''&lt;br /&gt;
|2025&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Another woke movie from [[Disney]] with race swapping of protagonist [[Rachel Zegler]] who expressed her hate to America and support of terrorist [[Hamas]] attack against Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
|$240–270 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Social Network'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the [[gossip]] website [[Facebook]], which feeds [[narcissism]] and destroys marriages.  The film also portrays drug use and [[misogyny]] in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$96,962,694&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Spring Breakers'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|From the creator of ''Kids'', this film is similar in its pornographic nature and glamorization of drug abuse, only this film takes it to a new extreme. Furthermore, this film promotes [[feminism]] and glamorizes the gangster/[[ghetto]] [[rap music]] lifestyle, while condemning Christians, labeling them as &amp;quot;weak&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;insecure&amp;quot;. Also, the film contains a full-on sex scene in the pool, and shows nudity, not only in that scene but also in several others.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,724,284&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek Beyond''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The film has [[Sulu|Hikaru Sulu]] as a &amp;quot;married&amp;quot; homosexual with an adopted daughter, which was a decision that even [[George Takei]] (Sulu's original actor and a prominent homosexual activist) took issue with.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://time.com/4398071/george-takei-simon-pegg-sulu-gay-star-trek-beyond/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$343.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Stepford Wives''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Feminist]] [[polemic]]. Ends with the protagonist beating her husband with an iron fireplace poker. The film's release coincided with the height of the [[ERA]] movement.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Stonewall''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the 1969 Stonewall Riots, this film is a pro-homosexual film that pushes the homosexual agenda. It's rather ironic to note that the film itself is a victim of historical revisionism, offensive racial stereotypes, and exclusion of the representation of minorities. While the filmmakers tried to defend their artistic decisions, the film was overwhelmingly criticized by critics and audiences (even liberals, not surprisingly, hated it) and failed to make its case for awards consideration during the 2015 Oscar season.&lt;br /&gt;
|$187,674&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Straight Outta Compton''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the gangster lifestyle and gangster rap, and portrays the [[police]] as racist, along with other anti-police aspects. &lt;br /&gt;
|$161,197,785&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Superbad''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes the teenage use of drugs, smoking, alcohol, and sex. The whole point of the movie is for a couple of guys to lose their virginity, which luckily failed by the end. The movie contains many uses of profanity, underage drinking, and drug use. The police are portrayed as dumb.&lt;br /&gt;
|$121,463,226&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Super Mario in real life''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; made by notorious Marxist Leah Hillman promotes drug use and the homosexual agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|$550&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Taking Woodstock''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the anarchistic and chaotic Woodstock festival in 1969 as well as the Hippie Movement, painting their various lewd actions, including homosexuality, in a positive light. Also has some elements of anti-Semitism due to the main character's parents, who acted as Holocaust survivors being portrayed in an unsympathetic light.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2009/08/28/taking-woodstock-mythologizing-the-worst-generation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$10 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tammy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Movie about a lazy unemployed woman who after losing her job, basically turns to a life of crime. As the film is about her and her grandma hitting the road, committing robberies, doing illegal prescription drugs, and buying beers for teenagers.  They have a Fourth of July party with no typical patriotic festivities, and is more like a drunken sex party, as the grandma reveals her breasts to the guest (the audience does not see them though).  &lt;br /&gt;
|$84,525,432&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tank Girl''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the left-wing comic, this film glorifies feminism and debauchery while making the capitalists the bad guys.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,064,495&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ted''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Do not let the idea of a talking Teddy Bear fool you; there is nothing childlike about this film. In an extremely raunchy comedy style, it normalized much of the liberal agenda, such as marijuana addiction, blasphemous language, and gay marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
|$218,815,487&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ted 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sequel to the film, which is equally as raunchy and vulgar. This film did not even make half as much as the original.&lt;br /&gt;
|$81,476,385&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Thank You For Smoking''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The title is self-explanatory, depicting cigarette endorsers as heroes. &lt;br /&gt;
|$24,793,509&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''That's My Boy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R (originally NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite staring conservative actor Adams Sandler this films depicts pedophilia, statutory rape, gerontophilia, child neglect, incest, and other forms of aberrant sexuality as &amp;quot;funny&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$57.7 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''There's Something About Mary''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains gratuitous sex and jokes about bodily functions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$176,484,651&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The To Do List''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Promoting sexual promiscuity and feminist sexual thoughts to teenage girls.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Till Death''&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This survival misandrist movie starring [[Megan Fox]] normalizes cheating on husbands, and ended with the survival of the cheating wife. The movie ended horribly at the box office&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''To Find a Man''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Pretty much a 90-minute abortion propaganda film.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Trash H*****s'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows decadent behavior in a positive light and glamorizes sexual deviancy.  Also the film is riddled with profanity, even the title has a naughty word (which was censored here).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Uncle Sam''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the heroes as a jaded amputated war veteran and a draft dodger, and the main villain as an extremely sociopathic soldier who joined the Army to kill as many people as he wanted, and the latter is depicted as being hyper-patriotic.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Under the Same Moon (La Misma Luna)''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Baselessly supports illegal immigration despite a pro-family sentiment.&lt;br /&gt;
|$23,311,391&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Unfaithful''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-18&lt;br /&gt;
| A sexually explicit movie that sympathizes with the cheating wife, ended up not being punished.&lt;br /&gt;
|$50 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Up In Smoke''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Stoner film that just promotes the use of marijuana.&lt;br /&gt;
|$44,364,244&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Vicky Cristina Barcelona''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Promoting sexual promiscuity, threesome relationships, adultery, and prostitution.&lt;br /&gt;
|$96.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Waterworld''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Suggests that &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot; was real, and the Earth has now become a flooded post-apocalyptic wasteland.&lt;br /&gt;
|$88,246,220&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Whale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie that demonizes [[Christianity]] because it's against homosexuals. Charlie (played by Brendan Fraser) abandons his family to be with a man, and after his &amp;quot;boyfriend&amp;quot; kills himself, he becomes The Whale, and starts masturbating to gay porn.&lt;br /&gt;
|$17.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Whatever Works''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A promotion of liberal values including homosexuality, nihilism, and various forms of sexual deviancy such as May-December Romances, misanthropy, and promiscuity, and also implies that even those with the strongest faith in Christianity and conservative have it vanish in an instant upon setting foot in New York City.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2009/07/16/whatever-works-doesnt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also notable as Woody Allen overtly pushing nihilism and complete selfishness as an absolute positive, in stark contrast to past films where he at least depicted some negative consequences to selfish behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2009/07/03/Review--Whatever-Works/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$35.1 million&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&amp;amp;id=whateverworks.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Wolf of Wall Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly promotes excessive, endless drug use, portraying it in a positive light, and claiming that illegal drugs such as [[heroin]] give people the will to keep working hard and stay focused and positive, as well as various forms of graphic and illicit sexual activity and voyeurism, (both heterosexual and in one scene, homosexual) and non-stop use of the f-word and hundreds of other profanities throughout. Portrays capitalists on [[Wall Street]] as greedy self-absorbed criminals obsessed with sex, drugs and violence in the form of the protagonist Jordan Belfort. Many audiences were shocked that this did not receive an NC-17 rating upon its release, especially since morality-deprived director [[Martin Scorsese]] broke the ''[[South Park]]'' movie's record for most uses of the F-word with his film. Christina McDowell, the daughter of Tom Prousalis, one of the people involved in Belfort's crimes, wrote a memoir on the subject specifically to call out Scorsese and DiCaprio for failing to recognize the victims of Belfort in the film, something even the most praiseworthy critics of the film admitted was a flaw.&lt;br /&gt;
|$116,900,694&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''A Wrinkle in Time''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A live action adaptation of the book of the same name by Disney, the film managed to completely cut out many references to Jesus Christ and biblical verses, as well as completely altered the joyous singing to remove any reference to God.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/faith/disneys-wrinkle-time-erases-books-bible-quotes-cuts-jesus-christian-figures-history/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Needless to say, it opened to a box office bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://movieweb.com/a-wrinkle-in-time-movie-review-2018/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$132.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Woman King''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie demonizes men with a fake story, which shows the movie's hero as a slave liberator, while she is actually an enslaver.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDYNImHt73g&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|50$ Million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''W.R.: Mystery of the Organism''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Essentially a plotless film riddled with disgusting orgies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''X-Men'' franchise&lt;br /&gt;
|2000-2019&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (R for Deadpool &amp;amp; Deadpool 2)&lt;br /&gt;
|Unlike the comics they're based on (which were about civil rights)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nuskool.com/learn/lesson/mlk-and-malcolm-x-the-civil-rights-movement-and-the-x-men-origins/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; liberals used this movie franchise to further the [[homosexual agenda]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T543J2L-gXU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cracked.com/article_20497_5-great-movies-with-mind-blowing-symbolism-you-didnt-notice.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bryan Singer director of four of the films (whom is also homosexual) was also cited for sexual assault of a minor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/18/business/media/in-lawsuit-director-of-new-x-men-film-is-accused-of-sexual-assault.html?rref=homepage&amp;amp;_r=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And the sexual abuse has continued to this day especially with the various similar scandals that came out in Hollywood starting with Harvey Weinstein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/08/usc-taking-student-petition-remove-bryan-singers-name-cinema-school-seriously/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Likewise, it was noted that Singer during filming for the first movie did not allow for the comics to be on the set, despite the film being based on them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://fourcolormedmon.blogspot.com/2017/11/3-filmmakers-working-on-comics-projects.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was also anti-Military, especially in the second film and to some extent X-Men Origins: Wolverine, as the main villain, William Stryker, was the head of a para-military group and depicted as very genocidal against mutants, and was also implied to be a Vietnam War veteran. This had been added in by screenwriter David Hayter, due to his experiences with the ''[[Metal Gear Solid]]'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,817,894,919	(all together)  &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Animated Films==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alita: Battle Angel'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|From producer [[James Cameron]] and director [[Robert Rodriguez]], this American film loosely based on the Japanese manga with the same name supports [[feminism]], [[environmentalism]], [[illegal immigration]] and [[anti-capitalism]], as the villains of the film are depicted as wealthy slavers who live above the poor ghettos. In contrast, the heroes are violent street thugs who hate money.&lt;br /&gt;
|$404,800,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alpha and Omega''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct through the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can also be seen as pro-environmentalist, as some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries rather than caribou, even though wolves are natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are portrayed in an elitist light for being determined and hardworking. One female wolf, Kate, can be described as a modern feminist. Like the other liberal film, ''Open Season,'' it spawned multiple unnecessary direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film, ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', but in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series, ''Back at the Barnyard'', rather than film sequels.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,107,267&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alpha and Omega'' sequels&lt;br /&gt;
|2013-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|These direct-to-video sequels follow the characters from the first ''Alpha and Omega'' movie and show the same themes from that film. The sequels encourage disobedient behavior, as Kate and Humphrey's pups are snarky brats who ignore their parents' orders to stay home; they even try to justify this in the sixth movie by claiming they get into &amp;quot;situations&amp;quot; because they're told to be kind and caring. An instance of racism is shown in the fifth film by three porcupines being told to be friends because they look alike.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A (Direct to Video)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Animal Farm''&lt;br /&gt;
|2026&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Shockingly distributed by Angel Studios, Andy Serkis's adaptation of ''[[Animal Farm]]'' goes against a lot of what the original story stood for, becoming a generic kids' movie with a sinister undertone. This cautionary tale about communism has been turned into a screed against capitalism, with Pilkington (reimagined as a woman in this adaptation) serving as a blatant expy of Elon Musk, showing that the left has never forgiven Musk for teaming up with President Donald Trump. This also implies that the pigs only turned evil because of capitalism; while Orwell himself had criticisms of capitalism, the movie's message keeps getting hammered over the audience's head. It was met with complete derision by both sides of the political aisle, some joking that the windmill in the movie would be a generator fueled by Orwell &amp;quot;rolling in his grave.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|TBA&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Animals United'' (Konferenz der Tiere in German)&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A goofy meerkat and a pacifistic lion journey with other animals from around the world (a polar bear, two tortoises, a kangaroo, a Tasmanian devil, and a rooster) to take down a dam built by humans, which had caused the Okavango Delta to dry up. This movie, based on a children's book, promotes a heavy environmentalist message, with the animals saying that all humans are causing harm worldwide (such as melting a polar bear's snowy home and setting the Outback on fire). The movie's ending amps up the environmental message to eleven, with many animals storming the cities and news reporters saying the animals will make humans pay for ruining the world.&lt;br /&gt;
|£2,133,051&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''An American Tail 3: The Treasure of Manhattan Island''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This film, unlike the other three ''American Tail'' films, definitely has a liberal bent.  Not only does it vilify businessmen (though it, I suppose, was mocking the Robber Barons and might have had some merit in that regard)  What is harder to excuse is pushing the point of white/European guilt of what happened to the Native Americans, even making Fievel, who himself fled from a bad situation in Russia, somehow feel responsible for the plight of the Native American mice.  This film and the negative reception were ultimately responsible for the death of the ''American Tail'' franchise. &lt;br /&gt;
|N/A (direct to video) &lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Ant Bully''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This pro-Communist film's main message of the power of the individual to be more powerful than one another is portrayed as a good thing. The exterminator, apparently the main antagonist, is vilified for simply doing his job, thus giving the animation an environmentalist message.&lt;br /&gt;
|$28,142,535&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Astro Boy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Based loosely on the 1952 manga and 1963 anime, liberal producers and writers twisted the cartoon to fit their [[Communist]] agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4Jqlxd7ufM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This strategy backfired, however, and the film was a critical failure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/astro-boys-abysmal-opening-and-imagis-sinking-ship-17586.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
|$19,551,067&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Set in a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of actual humans, this ''Lion King'' clone stars a bull who witnesses his father die after being wounded by coyotes, then he gradually accepts the responsibilities that come with being the leader of his animal community. Nevertheless, ''Barnyard'' accepts disorderly conduct because the animals still party recklessly, even with a serious and dedicated bull in charge. Plus, it portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid and persecutes coyotes for being carnivores. The neurotic ferret Freddy goes to liberal lengths to avoid the temptation to eat his rooster friend by becoming a [[vegetarianism|vegetarian]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and [[gambling]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$116,500,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battle for Terra'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animation has environmentalist overtones and portrays a Bible-quoting, American-esque military general as the main antagonist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,647,083&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Brave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup regardless of the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film, and was created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. It also has a setting similar to the Great Conservative Film ''How to Train Your Dragon'', which was released two years earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
|$540.4 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cars 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This Pixar sequel demonizes oil companies while aggrandizing ethanol (mentioned as Allinall). On the film's political agenda, director John Lasseter commented: &amp;quot;Why isn't alternative fuel more... Why isn't everybody jumping on that bandwagon? It makes so much sense: Electricity, solar, whatever. There's ethanol. There's all this stuff you could be doing. And so I thought, well, that could be really cool in that you could have big oil versus alternative fuel. That's when we kind of crafted the bad guy's story.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$191,450,875&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chicken Little''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This painfully unoriginal animation, which was adapted from a 1943 World War II propaganda short by conservative filmmaker Walt Disney (which was itself adapted from one of Aesop's fables), ridicules family values, especially when the title chicken's widower father, Buck &amp;quot;Ace&amp;quot; Cluck, is shown to be willing to disown his son. Later on, when the aliens proceed to attempt to invade and detonate Earth, it is simply because they thought it was a living organism that kidnapped one of their children. The film is borderline nihilistic because the townspeople are mean-spirited and frequently bully Chicken Little, and a brief gag implies that warping someone's mind against their will is acceptable. As one of the worst theatrical productions ever made by the Walt Disney Company under [[Michael Eisner]] (both critics and audiences agree on this), and even the very first Walt Disney Animation Studios' full-length feature completely animated in 3D (so not exactly a good start), the film's mean-spirited and deeply cynical plot line is suspected to have been done to compete with [[DreamWorks]] animated films helmed by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$135,386,665&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Delhi Safari''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A leopard cub and his mother in India join a gang of animals (a bear, a monkey, and a pet parrot) on their journey to Delhi to make the humans stop destroying their homes. This movie is very environmentalist, with examples of the parrot Alex pleading with humans to &amp;quot;share the world&amp;quot; with animals, which results in environmentalist laws being passed and apartment buildings being canceled.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3.10 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Delgo''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This [[pagan]] film has horrible scenes of violence, war, and mass murder. It performed so horribly at the box office that it was criticized for potentially traumatizing young children and was pulled from theaters after a week. It is currently the lowest-grossing computer-animated film of all time.&lt;br /&gt;
|$694,782&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Emoji Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13 for multiple references to the dreaded S-word in profanity)&lt;br /&gt;
|Not only is this film clearly an infomercial for various smartphone applications and features thinly disguised as an unoriginal take on the &amp;quot;hero's journey&amp;quot; story archetype, but it appears to devalue human language: the main teenager, Alex, can only win over his crush by communicating via text messages comprised exclusively of emojis, and a background teenager even says, &amp;quot;Words aren't cool.&amp;quot; Openly homosexual writer and director Anthony &amp;quot;Tony&amp;quot; Leondis considers the movie a deeply personal project for him: the main character is a sentient emoji who is different from his friends with his ability to show multiple expressions, which reflects Leondis' laughable belief that he is an outcast when, in reality, Hollywood praises that sort of sinful sexuality. The film briefly glorifies [[Facebook]], the world's largest social network and a hotbed for narcissism and relationship destruction; it gives minor lip service to feminism in the form of Jailbreak, a computer hacker girl emoji who refuses to be the princess emoji she was created to be; and has been unfavorably compared to ''Wreck-It Ralph'' and ''Inside Out'', two great conservative animations, plus the ambiguously conservative ''LEGO Movie''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydvQB-4bBfQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Worst of all, TJ Miller, who voices the lead emoji, once said the film is a subtle protest against [[Donald Trump]] based on allegations that Trump wants to censor Hollywood and other liberally biased media.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,650,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The End of Evangelion''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|With Shinji Ikari failing to do his duty until his boss (Misato Kasuragi) and partner (Asuka Langley Soryu) were killed, along with Shinji masturbating over Asuka earlier, we have one of the most depressing movies ever made, which ends with the destruction of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''FernGully: The Last Rainforest''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmental [[propaganda]], with an anti-industry message, is indoctrinated into children.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,650,296&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Food Fight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Aside from being considered one of the worst computer-animated films, the film vilifies capitalism and leading companies.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Free Birds''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animated film's main premise is taking turkey off the Thanksgiving menu.&lt;br /&gt;
|$55,750,480&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Gnomeo and Juliet''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This disturbing love story contains a joke that could be interpreted as passing off bestiality (in this case, with a garden gnome, which is normally an ''inanimate object'') as funny.&lt;br /&gt;
|$194 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Happy Feet''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This environmentalist film about singing penguins - and a misfit tap-dancing penguin - pushes the envelope to some extent with sexual humor and implied persecution against Christians.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/3/22/6-kids-films-filled-with-green-propaganda/2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$198,000,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Happy Feet 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Like the first ''Happy Feet'', this penguin movie does not push the envelope too much in terms of sexual humor, but it goes even further with environmental themes, pushing the global warming agenda. Staunch liberal actors Matt Damon and Brad Pitt voice two krill who are implied to be homosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,006,466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Home''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains environmental, illegal immigration messages, and somewhat supports the homosexual agenda as well. The male alien cross-dresses, and it features plenty of potty humor. The film also rejects hierarchy and tradition. &lt;br /&gt;
|$177,397,510&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Legend of the Titanic''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making a statement against the whaling industry. It even has a 2004 sequel, which is not only horrible but also flat-out bizarre.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lightyear''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Described as a [[gay]] ''[[Toy Story]]'', filled with pro-[[homosexual]] propaganda for kids.  Produced by [[Disney]], this film ignores all the events from the great conservative film about Buzz Lightyear, released 22 years earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
|disappointing $55M opening&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mars Needs Moms''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A 9-year-old boy named Milo defies his mother, behaves in disorderly conduct, and is somewhat [[Nihilist|nihilistic]]. Family values are poked fun at. It also has a brief scene poking fun at the great conservative leader, [[Ronald Reagan]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$39 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Minions''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This spinoff prequel to the ''Despicable Me'' films begins with the &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot; of the minions, which flies in the face of the creationist truth. The film shows the minions evolving from single-cell organisms in the ocean, suggesting that God does not exist. This film also glorifies criminality. Not to mention, it seems to sympathize with a family that has robbed a bank, an action which is congruent with the liberal idea of not working hard for wealth. A sequel, titled ''The Rise of Gru'', was released in 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.159 billion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Norm of the North''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This poorly received animation casts an environmentalist polar bear as the hero and vilifies major businesses through a greedy real estate mogul, possibly as a jab at Donald Trump. Three sequels promoting the same environmental message have been released since 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Nut Job''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|An incorrigibly self-serving exiled squirrel finds himself helping his former park creatures survive by raiding a nut store, which celebrates disorderly conduct, nonconformity, and environmentalism. One of the antagonists is a head businessman because he does not comply with environmentalism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,251,541&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Nut Job 2: Nutty by Nature''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|In the sequel to ''The Nut Job'', the businessman villain returns to try to build an amusement park, again persecuted for not being an environmentalist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26,989,904&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Open Season''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Although conservative star Gary Sinise appears, environmentalism and hate speech against hunters run rampant. It has had three sequels since then, each of lower quality.&lt;br /&gt;
|$85,105,259  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Over the Hedge''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Based upon the comic strip of the same name, animals struggling to steal food from trash for the winter are the heroes. At the same time, humans are painted as ignorant, uncaring towards animals (clearly an environmentalist message), and obsessed with food. Plus, a businesswoman is the main antagonist, and an exterminator is scorned for simply doing his job. In addition, one of the other main antagonists of the film (and the only animal main antagonist), Vincent the Bear, is villainized for forcing RJ the Raccoon to replace the food he had after the latter in a botched attempt to steal food that Vincent had hoarded for the winter ended up accidentally destroying the food stash, with an ad-libbed scene in the climax having Vincent admit that he got where he was by &amp;quot;backstabbing, betraying, and murdering&amp;quot; those that placed trust in him, which can be interpreted as a dig against Capitalism and the concept of private property.&lt;br /&gt;
|$155,019,340&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''ParaNorman''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The very ending of the film pulls a swerve and reveals that one of the characters, Mitch Downe, is homosexual, ignoring the fact that he was not even implied to be that earlier. This decision had been made by the director Chris Butler.&lt;br /&gt;
|$107.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Peter Rabbit''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged, in the articles &amp;quot;Unintentionally Sympathetic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Unintentionally Unsympathetic,&amp;quot; that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel, ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'', was released in 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
|$146,983,492&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Pocahontas (1995 film)|Pocahontas]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism. Also, unlike the film character, who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-expected box office receipts.&lt;br /&gt;
|$141,579,773&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Quest for Camelot''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This revisionist take on Arthurian legend throws everything that makes the source material great (Christianity, heroism, bravery, etc.) out the window for the sake of advocating feminism and wanting to be as worthy as a Disney animated musical film (Warner Bros produced this film), only to be panned by critics in the end. Even though it's supposed to be a G-rated family comedy, an incest joke appears as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.imdb.com/character/ch0100869/quotes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$22,510,798&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sausage Party''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As the first R-rated American animated film to be released by a major film studio in the United States following 1999's ''South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut'', ''Sausage Party'' blatantly criticizes religion and deceives audiences into thinking that, without religion and the existence of God, everyone can enjoy the most selfish, crude, and debauched activities (e.g. humanism, homosexuality, obscenity, and non-stop sexual intercourse) without guilt or a sense of a &amp;quot;religious obligation&amp;quot;. Made by Nitrogen Studios. A typical offensive and raunchy comedy film by modern Hollywood standards, directors Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan, producer Megan Ellison, producer/writer Evan Goldberg, and producer/writer/actor Seth Rogen (all of them fiercely liberal and some, ironically, of Jewish origin) made this film to bastardize the animation genre, as well as to push the liberal Hollywood agenda on politics and religion. For the past century, animated feature films have enthralled and enhanced audiences worldwide, as the best ones tell timely stories that children, teenagers, and adults alike can relate to and enjoy. The makers of ''Sausage Party'' seemed not to care about any of this, as they made this untimely film strictly for adults and believed that there aren't animated films for adults only to enjoy. Their warped belief is made very clear by the film's criticism and parody of many other animated films (namely Disney animations) and the presence of regular Disney collaborator Alan Menken as the film's songwriter. Altogether, ''Sausage Party'' is painfully unfunny and has virtually no plot or philosophical merit. Only liberal-biased film critics praised the film upon its release, while general audiences were repulsed by it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a side note, ''Sausage Party'' has attracted much criticism on two additional issues. First, the animators worked under poor, cruel conditions and were forced by the directors to work overtime without pay. Thirty-six of the 83 animators were blacklisted and went uncredited in the film, believed to be due to their complaints; comments made in anonymous interviews of some of the animators involved in the project by ''Variety'', ''The Washington Post'', and ''The Hollywood Reporter'' alleged that the comments were accurate. All the animators in the film were told outright that they would be blacklisted if they did not work overtime without pay. Second, a red-band trailer for the film was accidentally played before a showing of the Walt Disney Pictures/Pixar Animation Studios' PG-rated and family-oriented ''Finding Dory'', at a Concord, California multiplex in mid-June 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ew.com/article/2016/06/29/theater-plays-sausage-party-trailer-before-finding-dory-apologizes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The theater staff had forgotten to switch out an adult-audience trailer roll for one meant for G and PG-rated films, when adding additional screens to carry ''Finding Dory'' to meet audience demand. The incident occurred only once, and the theater apologized, while Rogen [[Twitter|tweeted]] that the story &amp;quot;made his day&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
|$89,645,124&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Secret World of Arrietty''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Japanese anime film is about a tiny homeless family that steals from regular people. Demonizes capitalism and promotes the redistribution of wealth.&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,202,743&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Strange World''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This pro-environmental Disney movie about an exploration family is also loaded with the LGBT agenda and identity politics. It even got to the point where people started walking out of the theater while the film was still playing.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,600,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tax the Rich: An Animated Fairytale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|An animated film written by [[Fred Glass]], narrated by [[Ed Asner]], and made for the California Federation of Teachers. It repeated rhetoric made by the [[Occupy Wall Street]] group about taxing the rich to have &amp;quot;their fair share&amp;quot; and demonized Capitalism in various ways, including blaming it on Asian sweatshops as well as the housing bubble bursting in 2008. [[Kirsten Powers]], a member of [[The Daily Beast]], and herself no stranger to liberal politics, acknowledged alongside conservative economist for ''The Daily Caller'' Tucker Carson on the Sean Hannity show that the cartoon was simply inexcusable and disgusting, with Sean Hannity also explicitly referring to it as a &amp;quot;disgusting hit piece&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sean-hannity-slams-ed-asner-398102&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://reagancoalition.com/articles/2012/20121206006-ca-union-class.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film was particularly infamous for a scene where, in a segment covering the trickle-down effect, a corpulent rich man representing the 1% of wealthy Americans, after having the scales literally stacked up in his favor regarding money, upon being asked why the 1% needed so much money, he responded &amp;quot;Don't worry, this is good for you too, it will trickle down from us to you&amp;quot;, with the latter statement being accompanied with a graphic of the rich man proceeding to urinate on the other ordinary people as they yell in protest. Although later versions freeze the footage just before the man pees on the crowd in response to the complaints about the scene, it was still implied by residual audio of the urine stream. Sean Hannety and Michelle Malkin of the Sean Hannety Show both expressed disgust with the video when covering it, and when one of the producers confronted Ed Asner as the latter was about to attend one of his roles at a play, the latter falsely claimed he didn't remember what he said on it, and also claimed that the bit about rich people peeing on poor people was disgusting only because it should have been in reverse, and then asked the producer if he had any money, and if so, if he should &amp;quot;p*** on [the producer].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr1ZzsAzq_M&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A 3D animated reboot film of the TMNT/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise produced by infamously [[woke]], mediocre, narcissistic and toxic actor [[Seth Rogen]], showing the iconic, popular and alluring character April O'Neil, who is classicly a Caucasian redheaded young woman of Irish-Scottish descents, as a cringey and deliberately blackwashed and obese teenager, another victim of modern liberal [[Hollywood]]'s anti-redhead/ginger racism and hatred and also its obesity promotion and propaganda with the misleading and deceitful term &amp;quot;body positivity&amp;quot;. This is also the second time [[Nickelodeon]] blackwashed that character; the first was in the short-lived TV series ''Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tentacolino'' (AKA ''In Search of the Titanic'')&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|The notorious sequel to ''The Legend of the Titanic'' stars the first movie's characters trying to find the sunken [[RMS Titanic]] only to be taken to the mythical city of Atlantis. This North Korean film portrays being held prisoner positively, for the king of Atlantis forces the main characters to stay in Atlantis forever. Don Juan willingly submits to being taken prisoner and coerces his companions to do the same. It also shows disrespect towards the tragedy of the Titanic and those who died on that night by referring to the Titanic as &amp;quot;mythical.&amp;quot; Family values are even set aside when the main characters are more concerned with seeing Atlantis again than with their families back home. A sequel TV series was released in 2011 with the same bad values and strange nature.&lt;br /&gt;
|€4,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''A Troll in Central Park''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Considered by many to be Don Bluth's worst film, the movie stars a troll named Stanley, who is exiled from the Land of Trolls for his love of growing flowers. He ends up in Central Park, where he meets two children. He also ends up a little ''too'' happy when a little girl kisses him on the cheek. The movie's end has an environmental message when Stanley causes plants to grow all over the city, potentially causing trouble for people in New York City. Even Don Bluth admitted this was the worst movie he had created, a statement many directors in the 2020s would never make about their recent flops.&lt;br /&gt;
|$71,368&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Turning Red''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|The film encourages rebellion against parents and is full of suggestive humor and unsuitable themes for children. One of the most blatant themes of this film is a metaphor for menstruation, in which the women in Mei-Li's family turn into giant red pandas. The movie even ends with Mei-Li blatantly telling her mother, &amp;quot;My panda, my choice,&amp;quot; a slogan used by pro-abortionists.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Wish''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The Walt Disney Company's 100th-anniversary film has the hero (Asha) team up with a fallen star to stop the evil King Magnifico from not granting all the wishes that people give him. While Magnifico is the villain of this film, some viewers feel he has a point in not granting every wish, since some could be used for more nefarious purposes. Furthermore, the film claims that humans come from stardust, which contradicts basic theology.&lt;br /&gt;
| N/A (Has yet to be released)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Schlockumentaries==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The 11th Hour]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This environmental schlockumentary produced and narrated by actor [[Leonardo DiCaprio]] endorses the theory of [[Anthropogenic global warming]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$707,343&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Almost any film directed by [[Michael Moore]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|All of his &amp;quot;documentaries&amp;quot; are composed of left-wing propaganda, promoting concepts such as universal health care, socialism, anti-Capitalist views, and gun control, and if that's not enough, he blatantly skews facts to push his agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''American Factory''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the title fool you into thinking it is patriotic. It covers the Chinese takeover of a GM plant as well as socialism in a positive light, and was made by the production company that the Obamas formed. The documentary gained additional notoriety when one of the producers of the film, Julia Reichert, quoted Karl Marx during her acceptance speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://us24news.com/blog/2020/02/10/oscars-go-communist-winning-producer-quotes-karl-marx-and-obama-praises-her/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[An Inconvenient Truth]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Al Gore]]'s [[global warming]] alarmist [[schlockumentary]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,146,161&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Unanswered sequel to Al Gore's 2006 schlockumentary, ''An Inconvenient Truth''.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Arctic Tale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary film geared towards children that pushes the false narrative of global warming and polar bears going extinct from melting ice caps.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,858,064&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Better This World''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|2011 documentary &amp;quot;feature length lie&amp;quot; is a [[PBS]] film regarding the thwarted domestic terrorist attack at the 2008 [[Republican National Convention]] and liberals attempt to re-write history.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA-TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blackfish''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A [[CNN]] documentary film about the captivity of Tilikum, an orca involved in the deaths of three individuals, and the consequences of keeping orcas in captivity, that is nothing but a propaganda film full of so many lies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://seaworldcares.com/the-facts/truth-about-blackfish/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film gained high ratings on movie review websites, making it seem the film brainwashes critics.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,073,582&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Bowling for Columbine]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A 2002 schlockumentary directed by and starring [[leftist]] propagandist Michael Moore. It is a pro-[[gun control]] film and distorts facts in favor of gun-grabbing. Also included a &amp;quot;Brief history of the USA&amp;quot; segment using animation mirroring that of [[South Park]], that distorted historical facts to make it seem as though guns were implemented by racists, which actually led to the South Park [[libertarian]] creators to condemn him, enough to give Moore a cameo in Team America as a suicide bomber and make his death especially graphic.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21,576,018&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cosmos: A SpaceTime Odyssey&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|TV-PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Darwinism and global warming alarmism are disguised as science.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fahrenheit 11/9''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Donald Trump]] hit piece by none other than Michael Moore. Trump got the last laugh as it ended up flopping at the box office &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2HyTh_6iyA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fauci''&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This Disney+ documentary about [[Anthony Fauci]] pretty much does nothing but inflate the titular doctor's ego even more. It also downplays the atrocities he has done before and during the Covid-19 pandamic.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The God Who Wasn't There'&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This documentary by noted skeptic [[Brian Flemming]] attempts to reinforce the massive wave of atheist propaganda from the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Jesus Camp]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006 &lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This baseless attack on conservative Christianity later incited [[liberal vandalism]] of the Bible camp shown in the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$902,544&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hail Satan'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Attempts to &amp;quot;humanize&amp;quot; followers of [[The Satanic Temple]] and literal [[satanism]], specifically depicting them as they try to get their monuments to [[Satan]] on government property and push their evil ideology on children, all while vilifying Christian values and portraying Conservative activists like Jason Rapert, an Arkansas State Senator who successfully got a monument of the [[10 Commandments]] erected in front of the Arkansas State Capitol building, as un-patriotic bigots.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hearts and Minds''&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary about the Vietnam War that was inherently anti-American in its nature. Also, depicts [[Catholic]]s as bigots. It also had a brief clip at the beginning which had the rolling crew having one of the higher officers forced to talk to them with the false promise that they'd burn the tape once he is finished with it. It also has several moments of graphic sex between soldiers and Vietnamese prostitutes. It also implies throughout the film that several atrocities conducted by the North Vietnamese communists were done by Americans, including the footage where a girl ends up burned by [[napalm]] and running out naked. Noteworthy for being almost single-handedly responsible for forcing America out of Vietnam (even having the NVA mailing the producers thanking them for &amp;quot;ensuring peace&amp;quot; in Vietnam) as well as it being an influence for far-left schlockumentarist/propagandist Michael Moore, with some of its filming techniques even being reused for ''Farenheit 9/11''.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Inside Job'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Democrat donor Charles Ferguson blames the Great Recession of 2008 on Wall Street, unspecified deregulations, the Bush Administration, and so on. He whitewashes [[Fannie Mae]] and [[Freddie Mac]]'s role and virtually eschews any mention of the Community Reinvestment Act. While advertised as nonpartisan, it contains various interviews with Democratic politicians but none with Republican politicians. Finally, Ferguson blames the financial system for corrupting American politics.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,312,735&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Truthers]] Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe blame America for [[9/11]].  Conspiracy Theorist [[Alex Jones]] worked as Executive Producer (and don't let his paleoconservative/libertarian views fool you into thinking it is in any way a conservative documentary).&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lost in Tel Aviv''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|A couple strives to make a filthy, [[South Park]]-esque animated series.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Makers: Women who Make America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013-2014&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary glorifying [[Feminism]], in particular, the faction that started with [[Betty Friedan]]'s ''The Second Sex''. Also features as examples of role models and pioneers of feminism such degenerates as [[Lena Dunham]] (creator of the liberal TV series ''Girls''), Linda Woolverton, [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Ellen DeGeneres]], [[Jane Fonda]], and [[Gloria Allred]]. On top of that, there's no mention of conservatives [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[Sarah Palin]], [[Phyllis Schlafly]], [[Michele Bachman]] or [[Carly Fiorina]]. Only showing more of their bias.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''McLibel''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997 (TV version)&lt;br /&gt;
2005 (Extended version)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|The fast food industry is blamed for environmental issues in a manner similar to ''Super Size Me'' and the liberal book ''Fast Food Nation''. Unsurprisingly, Morgan Spurlock, the director of ''Super Size Me'', and Eric Schlosser, author of ''Fast Food Nation'', are present.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal Alex Gibney attacks Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Real Charlie Chaplin''&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Another Hollywood star of the Golden Age targeted by the Left to promote [[woke]] Hollywood's/HollyWOKE's mediocre and deranged hacks and propagandists, even if it means they have to stain their reputation forever with slander and defamation way after their death, as they did with [[Walt Disney]], [[Stan Lee]], [[John Wayne]] and writer [[J.R.R. Tolkien]]. A documentary for woke streaming platforms of highly questionable reliability that tries to depict Charlie Chaplin as a [[pedophile]], instead of an [[Ephebophilia (Sexuality)|ephebophile]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;He was more appropriately ephebophilic and always within legality, there is no evidence that Charlie was attracted to prepubescents or literal children and ephebophilia was generally socially accepted back then, also due to the lack of today's mis/disinformation campaign on the topic, which modern Hollywood contributed to perpetuate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a misogynistic abuser and a tyrant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.newizv.ru/news/2022-02-18/a-pedophile-a-tyrant-an-abuser-an-honest-film-about-the-private-life-of-charlie-chaplin-has-been-released-389157?amp=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Religulous'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Militant atheism|Militant atheist]] &amp;quot;Comedian&amp;quot; [[Bill Maher]] tries to convince the audience of what he perceives to be the folly of all religion, with a special focus on Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,011,160&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Road We’ve Traveled]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Not rated&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Tom Hanks]] directs &amp;amp; narrates Barack Obama's supposed achievements&lt;br /&gt;
|NA&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Roger &amp;amp; Me''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Michael Moore]] blames capitalism for the downfall of Flint, Michigan instead of the [[trade unions]] that bullied businesses &amp;amp; forced them to ship jobs overseas (due to excessive taxation) or the fact that Flint has been under [[Democratic]] leadership since 1973. Later on, Moore would also admit that he never interviewed Roger Smith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://callcenterinfo.tmcnet.com/news/2007/06/16/2717913.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|$6,706,368 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Selling of the Pentagon''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS pushed this anti-American/anti-Vietnam War propaganda. The producers refused to divulge their sources to the Pentagon, and at least one of the officials involved entered a minor lawsuit against CBS.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dan Rather's Day of Reckoning&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.weeklystandard.com/print/dan-rathers-day-of-reckoning/article/5895&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''She's Beautiful When She's Angry'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Nothing more than feminist propaganda being passed off as truth.&lt;br /&gt;
|$421,573&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=beautifulwhenangry.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Super Size Me'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Morgan Spurlock eats nothing but food from McDonald's for a month to show the negative effects of doing so and tries using this experiment that no sane person would attempt to blame [[obesity]] on great capitalist paragons like [[McDonald's]] and [[Sodexo]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,536,423&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Tillman Story''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A liberals view of the circumstances surrounding the death of football star and [[Army Ranger]] [[Pat Tillman]]. The film portrays each and every fact as sinister. Plus, each and every fact is evidence of a conspiracy. Typical Hollywood [[George W. Bush]] bashing flick. The [[liberal bias]] was clear, make Tillman a liberal [[atheist]] anti-war hero that was cannon-fodder for the government. Tillman's actions speak louder than any twisted accusations presented in this documentary.&lt;br /&gt;
|$802,535&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Under the Gun''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-second amendment, the film was criticized for its inaccuracies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Uncounted Enemy: A Vietnam Deception''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-American/Anti-Vietnam War propaganda that infamously accused General [[William Westmoreland]] of deliberately understating the force strength of the [[Vietcong]] during the Tet Offensive. This resulted in a libel suit made by Westmoreland against CBS that promptly went to court after an internal investigation was issued due to ''TV Guide'' finding damning evidence of similar journalistic malpractice that was practiced in the earlier documentary/propaganda ''The Selling of the Pentagon'', which ultimately resulted in CBS losing its libel insurance, as well as the documentary unit being scrapped when [[Larry Tisch]] took over in 1987.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dan Rather's Day of Reckoning&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Wall Within''&lt;br /&gt;
|June 2, 1988&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary helmed by extremely liberal &amp;quot;journalist&amp;quot; [[Dan Rather]] that reinforced the false image of Vietnam War veterans being anti-social degenerates suffering from PTSD and drug abuse. Was also particularly infamous in that all six of the &amp;quot;veterans&amp;quot; that were interviewed were later confirmed by various documents to have never even served during the events they mentioned, and even the one who actually DID serve did not do so with boots on the ground and was a repairman.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://loonybird.com/media_dan_rather.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-capitalist schlock vilifies [[Wal-Mart]] and other discount stores. Created by the far-left Communist studio Brave New Films. &lt;br /&gt;
|$1.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Winter Soldier''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|The 1972 film about U.S. troops from [[Vietnam]] put on record as baby killers, [[human rights]] violators, and general disservice to America. This myth was propagated by a few anti-war activist liberal actors that never did see combat in Vietnam and some were never in the country. The initial result was to hold hearings in [[Congress]] over the matter. All allegations were proven fabrications, falsehoods, and lies.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Years of Living Dangerously'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmental schlockumentary spearheaded by ultra-liberal, [[James Cameron]], and featuring several proponents of [[Hollywood Values]] trying to preach the false idea of [[climate change]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anti-Christian and Sacrilegious Films==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheist films]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMDb (Internet Movie Database) is an internet based database of information related to films, television programs, home videos, video games, and streaming content and these works rated in terms of their quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMDb list of [[Atheism|atheist]]/[[agnosticism|agnostic]] themed movies indicates in terms of its ratings that there were many that were poorly done and there were many that were certainly not cinematic masterpieces.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.imdb.com/list/ls076551036/ Atheism themed movies - IMDb]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wikipedia]], an online encyclopedia founded by an atheist and [[Agnosticism|agnostic]], has not &amp;quot;Atheist films&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;List of atheist films&amp;quot; articles, but it does have a &amp;quot;List of [[Christianity|Christian]] films&amp;quot; article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_films List of Christian films - Wikipedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''2001: A Space Odyssey''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Stanley Kubrick's most notable film was controversial upon its release for its atheistic themes, particularly its support of the [[Theory of evolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,954,992&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''After Earth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This box office failure contains a peculiar mix of both evolutionist and [[Scientology|Scientologist]] themes, and it further tarnished M. Night Shyamalan's directorial career.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60,522,097&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
||Almost any film directed by Luis Buñuel &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Luis Buñuel was an atheist bigoted against Christians.  He unjustly ridiculed Christians throughout his filmography and was a pioneer in making this schlock being considered &amp;quot;art&amp;quot; when it is really just offensive, vulgar and grotesque liberal smut.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Antichrist'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This gruesome film's title says it all: it's full of horrifying imagery juxtaposed to Christian symbols.&lt;br /&gt;
|$791,867&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battlefield Earth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This Scientologist propaganda piece failed at the box-office and is largely considered to be one of the worst movies ever made. It &amp;quot;won&amp;quot; in nine categories at the Golden Raspberry Awards (aka, the Razzie Awards), making it the most awarded film at the Razzies until ''Jack and Jill'' took its place. Furthermore, it won one-time awards for &amp;quot;Worst Drama of our first 25 Years&amp;quot; during the 2005 awards, as well as &amp;quot;Worst Picture of the Decade&amp;quot; in 2010. Lastly, the film plays into the liberal notion of personal characteristics mattering more than true merits: John Travolta is the star because of his affiliation with the &amp;quot;church&amp;quot; of Scientology.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Benedetta'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|One of the most disgusting displays of blasphemy ever.  Made by liberal atheist Paul Verhoeven, this is a film that dares to insult the sanctity of Catholic nuns by suggesting that they are lesbians and scam artists.  It also insults God by portraying Jesus engaging in graphic sexual acts during a dream sequence and suggests that all Church leaders rape and have sex with women of lesser stature.  Not even the Virgin Mary is safe from ridicule in this awful monstrosity, as a statue of her is carved into a sex toy and used during some of the most graphic lesbian sex scenes.  It is also somewhat of a celebration of BDSM, as many of the torture scenes in the film are depicted as sexual.  A horrendous film that was protested throughout the world.  In the United States, the patriotic pro-family group The American TFP.  It was also outright banned in Russia and Singapore. The film was huge failure to producers with budget of $21.3 million and only got $4.3 million from box office.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4.2 Million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Book of Mormon''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Written by atheists Trey Parker and Matt Stone as what they sarcastically call &amp;quot;an atheist's love letter to religion&amp;quot;, this musical insults every aspect of the Mormon religion as two of the church's elders embark on a mission to Africa. There are several Biblical inaccuracies, which reflects the writers' insane, misguided belief that Christians will believe anything word-for-word if it's written in the Bible. In one song, a group of tribal Ugandans swears against God in the Ugandan language.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Boondock Saints''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The characters are supposed to be Christians (or &amp;quot;saints&amp;quot; as the title suggests), but they show themselves as anything but. They dispense their own form of vigilante justice (summary execution) and say the F-word in every sentence they can. The FBI agent who chases them is hinted throughout the film to be [[homosexual]]. Overall, the film is just a vulgar ''[[Death Wish]]'' rip-off. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Breaking the Waves''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It wrongly claims that God rewards and endorses adulterers and prostitution while vilifying devout Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,803,298&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Canterbury Tales''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972 (Italy and West Germany)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;1980 (USA)&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Directed by communist homosexual Italian director Pier Paolo Pasolini, the film is an utter butchering of the seminal work by Geoffery Chaucer, even including movie-exclusive scenes proving that its viewpoint is inherently left-wing and anti-Christian. Among the most infamous additions include two priests engaging in sodomy (only one is punished via execution due to being poor and thus unable to bribe his way out) and Satan defecating out screaming friars.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conclave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti Catholic movie that portraying cardinal as intersex.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cloud Atlas'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Supports the idea of reincarnation and features anti-Christian undertones.  Additionally, supports the idea of homosexuality and [[transvestitism]], as many of the characters are resurrected as the opposite sex, while still played by the same actor.  This idea of supporting homosexuality is further brought to the forefront as one of the movie's directors recently came out as having had a sex change operation as a way to promote the movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,108,272 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Craft''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As the title implies, it depicts witchcraft in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,819,936&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Crucible''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based upon the Broadway play by communist sympathizer Arthur Miller, this historical revisionist drama is an allegory intentionally written to compare the Christians of the Salem Witch Trials to the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) and comparing those accused of witchcraft to the communists HUAC hunted, ultimately spreading the idea that American communists of the Cold War era were helpless &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; of HUAC. In real history, John Proctor, one of the accused, was reported as living a “Christian life in his family and was ever ready to help such as they stood in need”, but in the film, he confesses to being a witch and publicly denounces God.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,343,114&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Da Vinci Code]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the book of the same name, this mystery film supports the false theory that [[Jesus]] Christ married [[Mary Magdalene]], pushing feminism and attacking Christianity along the way.&lt;br /&gt;
|$217,536,138&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dead Poets Society''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A worldly literature professor, John Keating (Robin Williams) is shown as inspiring and &amp;quot;open-minded&amp;quot;. This contrasts with the conservative Christian boarding school where he teaches, apparently portrayed as conformist, oppressive, and materialistic. The film also appears to promote teen suicide, as one of the main characters is able to commit suicide without a negative word ever being uttered against his actions by any positive character. &lt;br /&gt;
|$95,860,116&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dogma'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This attack on religion, particularly [[Catholic]]ism, contains cheap smutty jokes and incorrectly makes [[God]] female.&lt;br /&gt;
|$30,652,890&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Elena Undone''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Normalize mother and wife of pastor to cheat on him with lesbian. Normalize also Lesbian in vitro fertilization. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''EuroTrip''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Normalize drugs and sexual promiscuity to teenagers from prostitution to BDSM and incest. then desecration of the campus of the Vatican Church by having premartial sex inside Sacrament of Penance Confessional.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Exodus: Gods and Kings''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The prophet Moses is radically changed into an atheist and a terrorist. Glenn Beck said it essentially turns Moses into &amp;quot;an al-Qaeda member&amp;quot; who &amp;quot;doesn't want to rely on God anymore&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$65,014,513&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Forty Days and Forty Nights''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|In this vulgar sex comedy, the main character has to give up sex for Lent, and his ex-girlfriend tries tempting him to break his commitment throughout. Interestingly, it was released ''during'' the Lent season, so William Donnahue, President of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, requested to both then-[[Disney]] CEO [[Michael Eisner]] and [[Harvey Weinstein]] that they reschedule the airing of the film, citing that &amp;quot;To show a film that parodies Lent in a most vulgar way is bad enough, but to show it during Lent is outrageous.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicleague.org/appeal-to-michael-eisner-and-harvey-weinstein-reschedule-40-days-and-40-nights/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, despite the inflammatory material in the movie, the [[Anti-Defamation League]] head Foxman did not call out the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1083014/posts&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$37,950,822 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Golden Compass'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the atheistic ''His Dark Materials'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,107,728&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hail Mary'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Marxist filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard retells the story of Mary and Joseph in the modern day.  As per his business casual, it was controversial upon its release. [[Pope John Paul II]] condemned it, claiming it was likely to offend the deeply religious because of its explicit nudity.  Additionally, it depicts Joseph as a womanizing man [censored] and Mary in a similar light, as there is a montage where she is completely in the nude for no apparent reason. The film was banned in deeply religious countries such as [[Brazil]] and [[Argentina]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Haunting of Molly Hartley''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Christians are either starry-eyed kooks or homicidal maniacs, while those implied to be Satanists live a happy lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,418,749&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Heathers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes misuse of religious practices in the Catholic Church, including prayers with inappropriate language, using a holy water font to fix one's hair when it's only supposed to be for doing the Sign of the Cross, the priest using profanity which is considered a laicizable offense and never to be used in places of worship, and glorifying homosexual men as martyrs.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hercules''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This film seems to take a more atheistic turn on the Greek hero as opposed to the mythology behind Hercules.&lt;br /&gt;
|$72,688,614 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Immaculate''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-18&lt;br /&gt;
|Just like Benedetta movie, its disrespect to Christianity and Catholic church which stared by liberal actress Sydney Sweeney. The movie mock the virgin birth and create fake story on nuns sexual relations.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Inherit the Wind''&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|This historical revisionist drama contains a series of Hollywood-perpetuated lies about the [[Scopes Trial]] to smear Christianity, including: portraying [[William Jennings Bryan]] as ignorant, harsh, and punitive, based on an incorrect of his actions and testimony; falsely claiming that, at the end, Bryan, in a senseless fit of madness, died in the courtroom amid &amp;quot;caring&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;reasonable&amp;quot; [[Darwin]]ists; and wrongfully depicting Darwinists in a positive light and Christians as &amp;quot;deceitful&amp;quot;. In real life, Bryan and the Christians won the trial and were charitable to the end, while the Darwinist Darrow was deceitful in reneging on his deal to take the witness stand after Bryan did. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Invention of Lying''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Written and directed by British atheist [[Ricky Gervais]], the movie takes place in an alternate reality where the concept of lying does not exist until Gervais' character invents it. As a consequence of lying not previously existing, religion hasn't existed either, so, behind the facade of a romantic comedy, the main message of the film is that all religion is based in lies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingdom of Heaven'' (theatrical version)&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Atheist Ridley Scott directs this revisionist historical piece that portrays Muslims as the &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; of the Crusades. In truth, the Muslims of the day won every Crusade except the first (in which Christians briefly prevailed), the third and the sixth.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Last Temptation of Christ]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The film's eponymous final sequence depicts the crucified Jesus—tempted by what turns out to be Satan in the form of a beautiful, androgynous child—experiencing a dream or alternative reality where he comes down from the cross, marries Mary Magdalene (and later Mary and Martha), and lives out his life as a full mortal man. He learns on his deathbed that he was deceived by [[Satan]] and begs God to let him &amp;quot;be [God's] son,&amp;quot; at which point he finds himself once again on the cross. At other points in the film, Jesus is depicted as building crosses for the Romans, being tormented by the voice of God, and lamenting the many sins he believes he has committed.&lt;br /&gt;
Because of these departures from the gospel narratives—and especially a brief scene wherein Jesus and Mary Magdalene consummate their marriage—several Christian groups organized vocal protests and boycotts of the film prior to and upon its release. One protest, organized by a religious Californian radio station, gathered 600 protesters to picket the headquarters of Universal Studios' then-parent company MCA. One of the protestors dressed up as MCA's Chairman Lew Wasserman and pretended to drive nails through Jesus' hands into a wooden cross. Evangelist Bill Bright offered to buy the film's negative from Universal in order to destroy it. The protests were effective in convincing several theater chains not to screen the film. One of those chains, General Cinemas, later apologized to Scorsese for doing so. &lt;br /&gt;
Mother Angelica, a Catholic nun and foundress of Eternal Word Television Network, described ''Last Temptation'' as &amp;quot;the most blasphemous ridicule of the Eucharist that's ever been perpetrated in this world&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a holocaust movie that has the power to destroy souls eternally.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
In some countries, including Greece, Turkey, Mexico, Chile, and Argentina, the film was banned or censored for several years. As of July 2010, the film continues to be banned in the Philippines and Singapore.&lt;br /&gt;
|$8,373,585&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Legion''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|In this blasphemous film, God uses an army of angels to wipe out humanity, ignoring Psalm 91:11's promise that He sends angels to protect humanity.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$40,168,080 	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Ledge''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Atheist screenplay writer Matthew Chapman confirmed that the main character is the first openly atheist hero in American cinema. Likewise, his work misleadingly depicts Christianity, via the character Jon, as being &amp;quot;bigoted&amp;quot;, abusive, and domineering. Because of this, ''The Ledge'' failed at the box office flop and received generally negative reviews, with the liberal site [[TV Tropes]], similar to the issue with Thomas in the later liberal animated film adaptation ''Peter Rabbit'', even admitting under the articles &amp;quot;Unintentionally Sympathetic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Unintentionally Unsympathetic&amp;quot; that Jon was ultimately closer to being in the right than the main protagonist, Gavin.&lt;br /&gt;
|$610,986&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The prominent historical figure Joan of Arc is psychologically and emotionally unstable, impulsive, and prone to mood swings, so she leads the French army to victory purely out of selfishness, cruelty, and [[vengeance]]. However, historical evidence proves the contrary. Evidently, this film was made to criticize Roman Catholicism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$66,976,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Monty Python's Life of Brian''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A man is born on the same day as Christ Jesus and is mistaken for the Messiah. Expect an hour and a half of rampant sacrilege to follow suit.&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,398,164&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Monty Python's The Meaning of Life]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It's ninety minutes of absurdist, godless existentialism with a sacrilegious person's view of [[Heaven]] at the end by the staunchly nonreligious British troupe Monty Python. Need we say more?&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,929,552 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Most Hated Woman in America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This biographical drama sympathizes with [[Madalyn Murray O'Hair]], who is responsible for ending official Bible-reading in American public schools in 1963 ([[Atheism and Mass Murder|and disastrous results that liberals refuse to talk about]]), and not surprisingly turns her into a martyr (even though she and her family were robbed and murdered by people working for her own atheist organization).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''mother!''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|leading by atheist actor Javier Bardem. The film mocking Christianity and Bible by making god as poet. &lt;br /&gt;
|$14.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Missionary''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Copying the deranged lover plot device from other films (ex. Fatal Attraction), this film makes the maniac a Mormon.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Noah'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|In a liberal take on the classic story from the [[Book of Genesis]], liberals, going along with their usual ''modus operandi'', shoehorn in harmful messages that had nothing to do with the original story, such as [[environmentalism]], living on a vegan diet, and most notably, insisting that the [[Theory of Evolution]] is &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot;. In addition, many traits of the &amp;quot;antagonists&amp;quot; appeared to be more Biblical than those of the &amp;quot;protagonists&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Patterson, Roger &amp;amp; Chaffey, Tim (March 29, 2014). [https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/noah-movie-detailed-review/ The ''Noah'' Movie: Our Detailed Review]. ''Answers in Genesis''. Retrieved August 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$101,200,044&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Oh! Heavenly Dog''&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the title fool you. The movie is anything but heavenly, as it smears Christianity and presents a false depiction of reincarnation.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ode to Billy Joe''&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspired by the popular song &amp;quot;[[Ode to Billie Joe]]&amp;quot; from the prior decade, a main character kills himself after a drunken homosexual relationship (something not hinted at in the song), and the preacher (portrayed positively in the song) is made into a town gossip, causing the main female character to have to leave town to save her reputation.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27M (estimated)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Practical Magic''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 &lt;br /&gt;
|Yet another film glorifying witchcraft and attempting to mix romantic comedy into it (which even puzzled liberal critics).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/practical_magic/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was one of the many wiccan movies released during the late 90's.&lt;br /&gt;
|$46,683,377&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Priest'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly anti-Catholic and pro-homosexual.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,165,845&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|In this storm of political correctness for the sake of political correctness, the Christianity of Robin Hood and his Merry Men is heavily downplayed, save for Friar Tuck's initial bigotry toward the Muslim character Azeem. Azeem, who is not present in the original Robin Hood legends but was created for this version of the Robin Hood saga, is depicted as a wise, open-minded, tolerant mystic. Robin Hood and Azeem are portrayed by liberals Kevin Costner and Morgan Freeman, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
|$390.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''September Dawn''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-Mormon propaganda piece blatantly distorts history. The Mountain Meadows Massacre was perpetrated by a group of Mormons, but, despite what this movie says, Church authority did not authorize such an act, and they still condemn it to this day. This movie was strategically released in order to muddy the waters of Mitt Romney's 2008 presidential campaign. Fortunately, the filmmakers did not get away with their heinous crimes, as ''September Dawn'' received extremely negative reviews from film critics, very weak box office receipts, and a Golden Raspberry Award nomination.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,066,555&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Silent Hill''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the horror-themed video game series with the same name (go figure), the Christians are the cult-like antagonists.&lt;br /&gt;
|$46,982,632 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Silent Night, Deadly Night''&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A man becomes a serial killer after abuse from the Christian orphanage wherein he grew up. Conservative Christians successfully protested being vilified, and the film was pulled from theaters within one week of its release. &lt;br /&gt;
|$2,491,460&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Spotlight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Another film bashing Christianity. The &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot; uncover a scandal of child molestation in the Catholic Church. The film portrays them as &amp;quot;brave&amp;quot; (because Hollywood hasn't bashed Christianity enough) but ignores the fact that homosexual infiltrators within the Church, seeking to discredit and damage the Church, were responsible for the atrocities and their subsequent coverup. Strangely, the same unspeakable acts have been happening legally in Islamic nations but they are conveniently ignored by the liberal media (if the journalists uncovered that, then that would be an example of bravery). It also downplays the effect homosexuality had by having several characters specifically deny that homosexuality was a factor in their victimization and subsequent turns to homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
|$45,055,776 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek V: The Final Frontier''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Secular humanists are kind, but the religiously devout as violent and ruthless. Even liberally biased critics didn't like it, as it won three Golden Raspberry Awards (Razzie Awards), including Worst Picture of 1989, and was nominated for three more Razzies.&lt;br /&gt;
|$63 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sunshine''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This vehemently nonreligious, apocalyptic film is full of scientific inaccuracy. Christianity is embodied in a homicidal psychopath, who believes that it is the will of God for the world to end. This Christian is willing to kill anyone who gets in the way of what he believes is the will of God. The personified atheism, in contrast, is &amp;quot;sympathetic&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;kind&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;pro-humanity&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Truman Show''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|An atheism and humanism propaganda piece about liberal president Harry Truman. Truman doesn't realize his seemingly ordinary life is a reality TV show, overseen by Christof, the show's heartless and manipulative creator. Christof lives in the fake sky above Truman, watching over him, controlling everything from the weather to Truman's destiny. He is an allegorical substitute for the Christian God. (Notice &amp;quot;Christ&amp;quot; in his name.) Truman must escape from the false world of the show (Christianity) and triumph over Christof. As Truman appears to walk on water in the ending, the film is displaying the false, human-worshipping sentiment that man can replace God and be Lord of his own life.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,542,121&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Victor Frankenstein''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The protagonist of the classic conservative novel warning against the consequences of playing God is now one of the most openly atheist protagonists in cinema.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debatable Whether Liberal==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''21 Jump Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Two police officers try to take down a drug ring in high school, where the villains are environmentalists and drug dealers. But it also contains many sexual references, full profanity, and many religious insults. A parodic comedy remake of the 1987–91 [[Fox Network]] police drama of the same name.&lt;br /&gt;
|$201,585,328&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The 40-Year-Old Virgin''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A bawdy sex comedy about a man who is ridiculed by his peers for his indifference to sex as an adult. His friends, feeling that he isn't &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot;, try to encourage him to lose his virginity, starting with pornography, sex toys, and even prostitution. However, their personal attitudes towards women ruin their own relationships, and the man remains steadfast in his abstinence. Later, he meets a woman who connects with him, but is no longer a virgin, as she has a teenage daughter. At one point, her daughter confesses only to him that she is also a virgin and encourages him not to feel bad about it. However, her mother, who has been on multiple dates with him, is still unaware of his virginity. After their proposed deadline by which the two agreed to eventually have sex, he tells her of his virginity and stays reluctant about giving in. There is some drama and confusion between them, but she eventually comes to accept him, and the two are happily married at the end before having sex.&lt;br /&gt;
|$177.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Accepted''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|It criticizes the [[Department of Education]] (or colleges and universities in general) and our protagonist lives the American dream by starting his own college, but then the juvenile humor, gross-out humor and drug abuse steps in. &lt;br /&gt;
|$36,323,505&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Aeon Flux''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-cloning film, but also pro-feminism as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,874,337 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Aladdin (1992 film)|Aladdin]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the classic Arabian folk tale ''Aladdin and the Magic Lamp'', a poor but charitable thief is sent by Jafar, a sinister vizier, to search for a mysterious oil lamp rumored to contain unbelievably powerful magic. Upon finding this, he accidentally releases the comical genie, who grants his wish to become a prince so he can legally court Jasmine, the sultan's daughter. On the one hand, the film is set in what is implied to be a Muslim state, and Aladdin resorts to lying to try to marry Jasmine. A slight feminist bent is present because Jasmine refuses to marry, ignoring the law requiring it (although, in her defense, it's implied to be a recent law made by her father to be sure she is married to someone to rule the city and &amp;quot;taken care of&amp;quot; because he's &amp;quot;not gonna be around forever&amp;quot;). In addition, some lyrics from the opening song were notably cut for fear of offending the Arab populace, implying that the film is politically correct. The Sultan is portrayed as a massive bumbler and overgrown child, which may hint at an anti-parenthood agenda, but also shows character and authority in a few instances. But on the other hand, the film does ultimately push character integrity because Aladdin ultimately decides against lying and tells Jasmine the truth about himself. Disregarding the film's slight politically correct treatment of Arabia, it ultimately showcases some more negative elements of Islamic culture via a vendor nearly chopping Jasmine's hand off when she &amp;quot;steals&amp;quot; some food to feed a starving child, as well as depicting Prince Achmed in a very negative light via his cruelty to Aladdin and children attempting to stop him. The prince is portrayed as a poor example of a husband, so it is subtly suggested that Jasmine refused to marry because all the princes she encountered had, in fact, been as bad as Achmed. She then falls for Aladdin because he saves her life and shows her kindness. In addition, it is made clear that while Aladdin does steal and initially had an infamous reputation for his thefts, it's solely in order to survive on the streets, with it being heavily implied that he was an orphan, and he also selflessly gives his stolen food to starving children after initially planning to eat it. There is a lesser condemnation against the occult, as the only explicit magic-user besides Aladdin's Genie is Jafar, the main villain, who dreams of becoming the world's most powerful dark sorcerer.&lt;br /&gt;
|$504.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Aliens''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The second film, ''Aliens'', is an anti-Vietnam War statement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T543J2L-gXU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and, like its predecessor, copies another earlier feature (in this case, the 1954 film ''Them!''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVoX-C9J4Zk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). However, liberal pundits currently denounce it as a pro-war film, and it is to be noted that despite technically pushing anti-Vietnam messaging, it unintentionally ends up being a pro-Vietnam statement at the same time, as the Vietcong stand-in for the film was the titular antagonists, the Xenomorphs, hinting at the Vietcong being depicted negatively. Motherhood is also depicted neutrally. Although the Xenomorph Queen, who is depicted as embracing her maternal instincts, is depicted in a negative light, the film's protagonist Ellen Ripley was also shown to embrace motherly instincts as well and treated positively for it, acting as a surrogate mother to the orphan Newt and going out of her way to protect and rescue her in the film (most feminists even back then, much less today, tend to demonize the concept of motherhood).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alien Resurrection''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The fourth film is overtly feminist. But on the other hand, Annalee Call was also depicted as a Roman Catholic (with the novelization elaborating that she willingly chose to become one due to viewing it as &amp;quot;rational&amp;quot;, which acted as a rare instance of rationality and Christianity being rightly treated as complements, as most liberals tended to act like rationality and religion are completely separate entities since the Enlightenment).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Antz''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Produced by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], Dreamworks's first animated film downplays the military, and possesses an implicit promotion of Communism via the main character, but also has an Anti-Eugenics message too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$90,757,863&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Army of Darkness''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite its unrealistic depictions of demons, it's a pretty gun-centric pro-Second Amendment film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,502,976&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Atlantis: The Lost Empire''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released during the [[Michael Eisner]] era of [[Disney]]. On the one hand, the main villain is a military commander who would endanger the lost city of Atlantis just to be rich, and it is implied that he would commit treason by selling the power source to the Kaiser during World War I for the same motivation. The theft of the crystal to become rich could be seen as a condemnation of capitalism. That being said, however, capitalism has also been promoted in a more positive light in the form of Preston B. Whitmore, an eccentric but ultimately good-hearted billionaire who funded the expedition in the first place, and in addition, most of the principal cast was shown to have dreams of getting a better lot in society, with it being heavily implied in the ending that they ultimately succeeded in achieving those dreams after selflessly trying to save Atlantis, which acts as an implicit promotion of both capitalism and the American Dream.&lt;br /&gt;
|$84,056,472&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Paints Christmas in a positive light and has Beast learn its meaning while putting aside the past he had blamed for his curse. Also significantly tones down the more feminist messaging from the original film. The manner in which Christmas was depicted, however, was closer to the secular view of Christmas than the actual intended meaning of the holiday being a celebration of the birth of [[Jesus Christ]]. The movie overall, however, is objectively of very low quality and pretty forgettable to say the least, and since it is a direct-to-video sequel/midquel realized by another studio (now defunct) and with a lot of incoherences, it's not even canon in the universe of the original animated classic film that preceeded it.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A (Direct to video movie)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Bee Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|It's debatable whether or not its environmentalist or against it. It does show the destructiveness of environmentalism (i.e. butting into nature's problems in the name of helping her). The anti-human human sentiments in the movie turned out to be wrong, however, the humans are taking the honey made by the bees, similar to the welfare program of taking from those who worked for it. Others believe the movie promotes [[bestiality]], and is just disguised as a family movie. &lt;br /&gt;
|$287,600,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bohemian Rhapsody''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A biopic of [[Freddie Mercury]], the lead singer of the band Queen. While it does show elements of the practice of homosexuality and hedonism, at the same time, the film largely condemns the practice since it was made clear that Mercury's embracing of these things was what ultimately ruined Queen and his personal relationships, and is what ultimately killed him via AIDS. In addition, Paul Prenter, the only other major character to embrace homosexuality in the movie, was depicted in a very negative light, as he was one of the reasons Mercury went down a bad path, with it being made clear later on that Paul largely was using Mercury for his own gratification, blamed others for his bad ideas, and even hid vital information from Mercury deliberately such as the Live Aid concert plans as well as Mary Austin calling him. It also had a promotion of redemption, as Mercury, inspired largely by his former girlfriend/wife, Mary Austin, nearing the end of the film, attempts to reconnect with his band and family and make amends in the time he had left before dying from AIDS. That all being said, however, it's debatable whether the film intended to paint his homosexual escapades in a negative light, as several members of the production company, including Freddie Mercury's actor Rami Malek, indicated that it was a &amp;quot;regrettable&amp;quot; decision as a result of not having enough time to give a &amp;quot;more balanced&amp;quot; view of (ie, promoting) his bisexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Brady Bunch Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A parody of the famous 1970s sitcom, the Bradys still act like their normal selves even though it’s set in the mid-1990s. The plot is about Mike owing the IRS $20,000 in back taxes, and with his 1970s architectural style not being hip with new clients, and spending a bunch of money on trips to the Grand Canyon and Hawaii, they may have to sell the house, which is what Larry Dittmeyer needs for his plan to turn the neighborhood into a mall. On one hand, the High School counselor is played by the infamous drag queen RuPaul, and Marcia’s friend Noreen is heavily implied to be lesbian. However, Peter, who’s going through puberty, eventually builds up the courage to knock down the bully Eric Dittmeyer and win over his crush, and the Bradys always stick together, regardless of whether the house forecloses or not, even if the road is rough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four members of the original cast cameoed in this film being Christopher Knight as a coach who encourages Eric Dittmeyer to beat up Peter, Barry Williams as a record producer who turns down Greg after hearing him sing “Til I Met You (Clowns Never Laughed Before),” Ann B. Davis as a truck driver who finds Jan, and returns her home, and [[Florence Henderson]] as Carol’s mother. Mike Lookinland was supposed to be a background cop, but that scene got cut.&lt;br /&gt;
|$54.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Campaign''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Political comedy depicts the Democrat candidate (Will Ferrell) as an obnoxious, drunken womanizer and satire of [[John Edwards]], although the Republican candidate (Zach Galifianakis) is portrayed just as negatively as a corrupt capitalist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$33,165,738&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chicken Run''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Produced by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], this vegan propaganda film compares a chicken farm to the [[Holocaust]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynn_A73hcfs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The main villain of the movie is a capitalist who wants to make chicken pies. The film also promotes feminist and anti-American themes. On the other hand, the main villain of the movie is also a feminist, as she calls her husband's ancestors &amp;quot;poor, worthless nothings&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$106,834,564&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cocaine Bear''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This horror-comedy film, directed by feminist Elizabeth Banks, is loosely based on an incident in 1985 involving a Georgia black bear consuming 75 pounds of cocaine. While the bear in real-life died from an overdose, the bear in the movie lives and terrorizes people in the Chattahoochee National Forest in northern Georgia. On the one hand, there is plenty of swearing (even from the kids), blood, and drug use in this film. On the other hand, the movie also shows the damage drugs can do; the two main kid characters try a brick of cocaine but spit it out immediately. A sense of family is also upheld, as the single mother Sari is determined to find her lost pre-teen daughter despite being in the woods with a cocaine-riddled bear roaming around. Two drug-dealers also eventually decide not to carry out their boss's insane orders, one of them - his son - promising to be a better father to his son (he had left his son in the drug boss's care to drink over his dead wife, which his father and best friend call him out on).&lt;br /&gt;
|$&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Coco''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A beautiful animated film about tradition and family. In Santa Cecilia, Mexico, 12-year-old Miguel Rivera secretly dreams of becoming a musician like Ernesto de la Cruz, a popular actor and singer from his great-grandmother Coco's generation, despite his family despising music. After entering the Land of the Dead, Miguel encounters Héctor, a down-on-his-luck skeleton who once played music with Ernesto. Héctor offers to help Miguel reach Ernesto; in return, he asks Miguel to take his photo back to the Land of the Living, so that he might visit his now-elderly daughter before she forgets him and he disappears completely. However, strong [[feminism]] is also present, as the men in the movie are typically weak, and the only strong male figure is the villain. Not to mention it presents a bizarre afterlife without the reality of Heaven, Hell, or any need for the Gospel.&lt;br /&gt;
|$591.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Django Unchained''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Quentin Tarantino's own version of the Django character (there's a scene where the original Italian Django makes a cameo and Tarantino's version speaks to him, another tribute by Tarantino to the Spaghetti-Western genre that has always been his source of inspiration). As common for Tarantino's movies, graphic violence with practical effects and the constant use of the word nig*er is the norm also here, but this time there is one revisionist take on the author of the book ''[[The Three Musketeers]]'', in which German former dentist and now bounty hunter Dr. Schultz tells the racist slave owner Calvin Candie that [[Alexandre Dumas]], the author of ''The Three Musketeers'', of which Candie is a reader, is black and said in a way like he was not even French. This, of course, is universally known and proven to be very far from true, and it takes very little to debunk this gigantic lie. There's also the ridiculously exaggerated reaction of terrorized people when they see a black man on a horse coming into town; this is surprisingly unrealistic for a Tarantino movie. However, the reason this film is in this section is because the protagonist Django, when discussing with Schultz the plan to take Django's wife from Candie's plantation pretending to be in the business of slave mandingos, he mentions that there's no worse dishonor than being a black slave owner, and this is a more unique than rare time in which really and historically existed black slave owners in America (just like black [[Confederates]]) are mentioned in a liberal Hollywood film.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Crow''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The tagline claims our hero is an angel, but he doesn't exhibit any Christian values. However, there is an anti-drug scene where Eric Draven (the hero) makes a drug addict mother realize that her daughter needs her &amp;amp; gets her off drugs. On top of that, the film's villains are nihilist anarchists. The film is notable as Brandon Lee's last, as he was killed in a set accident during production.&lt;br /&gt;
|$50,693,129&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ed Wood''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it does glorify cross-dressing and the [[homosexual agenda]], it still is pro-capitalism, and the film also glorifies the American dream. Despite the obstacles Wood faces, he still continues doing what he loves in making movies.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,887,457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Edward Scissorhands''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Endorsed by the Christian website ChristianAnswers.net, with a 4-star rating. Conversely however, a prominently featured Christian character - the only character in the movie ever identified as Christian - is portrayed as fanatical and bigoted against people with scissors for hands.&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,362,352&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Falling Down''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R 	&lt;br /&gt;
|Film takes jabs at many [[liberal values]], [[illegal immigration]], union workers, multiculturalism, (one scene where Bill tells his ex-wife that the ice cream shop him and his family used to go to is now a Mexican store) and foreign aid (in one scene Bill asks an illegal Korean immigrate a rhetorical question on how much America has given his country and yells at him after he refuses to learn the language).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4tC4qfv92Q&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It's also one of the very few films to be truthful in the &amp;quot;Nazis were right-wingers&amp;quot; myth perpetrated by liberals, in which Bill informs a Neo-Nazi that he's an American and the Nazi is a sick a-hole. As well as many shots where the America flag is trashed upon (which could symbolize how liberalism has trashed everything America has stood for).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piPzExBdfIg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But at the same time it also takes jabs at capitalism, where Bill believes he's no longer commercially valuable. And although the plot is about man trying to reach his daughter's birthday party, the film seems to toy with its audience in suggesting whether he's mentally ill or not, as opposed to a pro-family message.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$40,903,593&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fantastic Mr. Fox''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the 1970 children's book of the same name by Roald Dahl, Wes Anderson's first animated film stars Mr. Fox - an anthropomorphic red fox who used to steal farm birds for a living - growing bored with domestic life. He decides to get back into stealing poultry with the help of a meek opossum named Kylie, but their attempt at one final heist brings three farmers - Boggis, Bunce, and Bean - to target Mr. Fox and his family, and he has to enlist the help of his friends and family to fight back against them. On the one hand, the farmers appear to be capitalists since the store that the animals take food from belongs to all three of them (Roald Dahl had refused to put this in the book when he was alive, saying that it would be too easy a solution for the animals, as well as concerned that it would teach kids to steal). Mr. Fox's son, Ash, is also said to be &amp;quot;different,&amp;quot; possibly referencing being homosexual or transgender, with Beaver's son even mentioning that Ash dresses like a girl. The characters also swear, but since it's a PG movie, they replace these swear words with &amp;quot;cuss.&amp;quot; On the other hand, while Wes Anderson's style of dysfunctional family shows up here, Mr. Fox ultimately loves his family and would do anything for them, even willing to sacrifice himself to save his nephew when the farmers capture him; he also fights his former partner-in-crime Rat to the death when the latter threatens his son and acts lecherously toward his wife. Mr. Fox also faces the consequences of his thieving ways and vows to make it up to everyone, showing that, despite his arrogance, he wants to do right by his friends and family and admits he was in the wrong. &lt;br /&gt;
|$21,002,919&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Fargo]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A pregnant sheriff with traditional American family values solves an elaborate criminal embezzlement, kidnapping, and murder scheme. It remains debatable whether she is a feminist or a feminine protagonist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,611,975	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Furry Vengeance''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This film is environmentalism and anti-[[Capitalist|capitalist]] on steroids. A wealthy businessman and his employees are the antagonists for doing their job. One of them gets attacked by a raccoon. In the end, the main character, a real estate developer, is forced to change his job after &amp;quot;learning the animals' stories,&amp;quot; and he even puts up a poster stating that anyone who violates forest preservation laws will be fined $1,000,000.00. However, the film is also pro-family, as well as taking a jab at LGBT, with a joke of the protagonist being forced to wear his wife's clothes after the animals steal his, this is played for laughs and is clearly anti-[[cross dressing]]. (Though they are wearing again in the end credits).   &lt;br /&gt;
|$35,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ghost''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The [[Bible]] claims ghosts don't exist. Still, this film toys with the idea that they do, and it has a liberal actress, Whoopi Goldberg, as a psychic medium. Nevertheless, the film does show Christian values, as the ghost Sam Wheat tries to uncover a bank fraud case by convincing Goldberg to give the money to a Christian charity. It also has an anti-infidelity message, as despite being widowed, Sam's wife Molly still refuses to be with anyone else, even when his false friend Carl tries to hit on her. Also it isn't PC on [[Eternal damnation|damnation]], as the villains are seen being cared away helplessly by evil spirits after they die.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$217,631,306&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Good Kill''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Ethan Hawke plays a man who questions the ethics of his job as a drone pilot, while it is taking a jab at the [[Barack Obama]] regime (Obama has droned more people in the Middle East than George W. Bush, most of whom were innocent bystanders, and the left has ignored it or claimed it was a &amp;quot;Fox News conspiracy&amp;quot;). It could also be against the War on Terror too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$316,472&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Grave of the Fireflies''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|While the film has been labeled anti-war, the director Isao Takahata stated the actual meaning was about growing up. The film's message is still debatable to this day.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Growing up Brady]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on Barry Williams’ 1992 autobiography of the same name, it tells the story of Barry Williams playing Greg Brady on ''The Brady Bunch,'' along with Williams doing questionable stuff such as smoking weed and getting co-star Maureen McCormick to do it, along with taking TV mom Florence Henderson on a date after he initially striking out with McCormick, and shows that Mike Lookinland wanting to make out with Susan Olsen as funny. It also covers Robert Reed’s feud with series creator and executive producer [[Sherwood Schwartz]] over the show’s incredibly cheesy tone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn’t condemn Robert Reed’s homosexuality, and shows that Mike Lookinland wanting to make out with Susan Olsen as funny.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A (TV Movie) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Halloween III: Season of the Witch''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Unlike the two films before it (which has mass murder Michael Myers) this film's villain is a pagan who plans on sacrificing children via witchcraft to bring back the original celebration of Halloween. However, he does this by selling masks to them which many critics pointed out may have been an anti-capitalism message.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/1982/10/22/movies/haloween-iii-plotting-a-joke.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film's &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot; is also an adulterer.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,400,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hansel &amp;amp; Gretel: Witch Hunters''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Western fairy tale characters Hansel and Gretel are now adults and have their own private bounty hunting organization in hunting witches. Portrays witchcraft in a negative manner, and guns in good light. But the gore, graphic violence and brief nudity is rather unnecessary.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$55,703,475 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Harry and the Hendersons''&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Should be PG-13 for multiple uses of the dreaded S-word in profanity.&lt;br /&gt;
|$49 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''High Noon''&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|A favorite of both Presidents [[Dwight Eisenhower]] and [[Bill Clinton]]; [[John Wayne]] said it was &amp;quot;the most un-American thing I've ever seen in my whole life&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/highnoon.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though susceptible of various interpretations, most of all it seems to scare people into wanting more government.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,750,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hoot''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmentalist movie about a bunch of kids who stand up to a CEO company that is trying to put one of its restaurants on a burrowing owl habitat. However, despite a businessman being the main villain, it doesn't condemn capitalism as a whole, since it doesn't portray the company in a negative light. The protagonists clearly have nothing against the business itself; even the main character states, &amp;quot;A pancake house would be great.&amp;quot; It also shows a police officer in a positive light. Overall, the movie contains many morals, including friendship, and it gives kids great inspiration to stand up for what they believe is right. &lt;br /&gt;
|$8,117,637&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Horrible Bosses 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sequel to ''Horrible Bosses''. Though this film could be argued to actually support the American Dream and capitalism, which its processor clearly did not.&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,445,357&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996 film)|The Hunchback of Notre Dame]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Released during Michael Eisner's presidency at Disney, the film presents a mixed package. The original source material was not intended for children, yet the Disney film was marketed to young audiences as such.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, the film manages to be slightly more pro-Christian than its source material. For example, the character of Frollo, who was the corrupt archdeacon in the novel, is now the minister of justice, and the Archdeacon is now a separate character voiced by Davis Odegn Steirs, who serves as the positive Christian conscience in the film (albeit the only positive Christian conscience). The Archdeacon is the one responsible for saving Quasimodo from Frollo committing infanticide and encourages Esmeralda to pray to God. Phoebus is also depicted in a good light, as an honorable soldier, and also shown to genuinely love Esmeralda, even going as far as to save her as well as Quasimodo. This is a stark contrast to the book, where he was a callous womanizer who abandoned Esmeralda to be hanged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christian imagery is present throughout the film, which is appropriate since Notre Dame is an actual location, unlike several Disney films set during the Renaissance, where churches are absent of religious imagery to be more politically correct. The Latin Requiem Mass is also present in the musical score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most films in the Disney animated canon, this film actually has the characters relying on God's grace to resolve the conflict rather than on some special magic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, in some cases, the film actually manages to be even darker than the original novel. Originally, Quasimodo's vicious punishment at the hands of the Parisians during the Feast of Fools ceremony was not corporal punishment; in the Disney film, it was done at the Parisians' whim, just for the sake of it. In addition, Frollo himself was also made significantly more villainous in the movie compared to in the book despite being separated from the archdeacon role, removing most of his redeemable traits in the book (case in point, in the film, Frollo was responsible for killing Quasimodo's mother and nearly killed Quasimodo himself as a baby until being made to raise him as penance by the archdeacon, and was depicted as an abusive father figure overall, as well as depicted as sadistic, in contrast to the original novel, where he willingly took in Quasimodo when he was in fact abandoned by his mom and was depicted as a fairly good father figure, at least until Esmerelda entered the picture). Some Christian concepts were also removed from the film in an attempt to heighten Frollo's villainy (for example, Quasimodo in the film was named as an insult to his deformed appearance, whereas in the book he was actually named after Quasimodo Tuesday). It's also debatable whether it's pro-Christian overall, since while the Archdeacon himself was a positive influence, most of the other Christian characters, without even counting Frollo, were depicted in a very negative light. The director's commentary also implied that they may have included blasphemous material by depicting Frollo in a crucifix pose as he descends into Hell during the Hellfire visuals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;DVD Commentary: &amp;quot;Here's some more of our ham-fisted symbolism--Frollo falls down in the shape of a crucifix!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film, however, shows a clear case of divine punishment in animation, represented by the death of Frollo, literally seeing the Devil in the face, before falling to his horrible death into the &amp;quot;fiery pit&amp;quot;. Also pretty ironic, considering that his last words a few instants before his death were &amp;quot;And he shall smite the wicked, and plunge them into the fiery pit!&amp;quot;, when he was going to kill Esmeralda and Quasimodo with his sword.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To make the film even darker, a gypsy genocide plot is introduced, and Paris is also the victim of arson late into the film. The song 'Hellfire' was also notorious for making explicit references to lust. Not necessarily a bad or negative thing, it can be considered courageous, original, surprising, and entertaining artistically speaking, and for families with kids who are not &amp;quot;snowflakes&amp;quot;. However, this is in stark contrast to most other Disney film adaptations, which have a history of toning down the original works (as in ''[[The Jungle Book]]'', where Disney advised the writers to ignore the book specifically because its contents were unsuitable for children). However, on the other hand, other films from the Walt's era were more dark with particular horror and dramatic elements than their original counterparts and source materials, like ''[[Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs]]'', ''[[Pinocchio]]'' (with evil and sadistic Stromboli unlike his novel countepart Mangiafuoco, the demonic and sa distici Coachman and all the cursed Pleasure Island with the impressive children turning into donkeys scene, and the terrifying whale Monstro), all the ''[[Night on Bald Mountain]]'' segment in ''[[Fantasia]]'' (with Chernabog and even harpies showing bare breasts, though for a few seconds), ''[[Dumbo]]'' (with its Pink Elephants on Parade allucination caused by accidental consumption of alcohol), ''[[Bambi]]'' (for the (in)famous scene of the death of Bambi's mother), ''[[Sleeping Beauty]]'' and ''[[101 Dalmatians]]'', this latter two specifically for their villains' scenes (Maleficent and Cruella De Vil). The Gypsies were also depicted in a more positive light, to the extent that they, at times, were considered preferable to Christianity, despite Gypsies essentially being pagans. Hints at race swapping were also included in the film, as Esmerelda was made into an ethnic gypsy in the movie, when in the original book, she was actually a blonde Parisienne and the daughter of an anchoress who was abducted by the gypsies and made into their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Worst of all, one of the male gargoyles falls in love with Djali, who is male according to some descriptions (voiced, however, by a female voice-actress and fans mostly refer to it as a female goat, and probably the gargoyle confused Djali with a female goat, assumption supported by his known clear stupidity), which may have meant that liberals will subtly shoehorn the homosexual agenda into anything, even the gargoyles of Notre Dame (and also comes across as extremely hypocritical and blasphemous due to homosexuality being tolerated even less by God than Frollo's lust for Esmerelda, based on God explicitly referring to the concept as an abomination in Leviticus as well as his destroying Sodom and Gomorrah largely because of the practice of homosexuality). However, this should be taken with a grain of salt, because the DVD audio commentary Kirk Wise (co-director), Gary Trousdale (co-director), and Don Hahn (producer) suggest that it's possible that the three gargoyles exist purely in Quasimodo's mind and are in fact split-off portions of his own personality created to deal with his loneliness. This doesn't explain, however, their scenes when Quasimodo is absent, how animals (especially Esmeralda's goat) can see them alive, the damage thev do to Frollo's soldiers in the climax, and their constant change of positions when they stop animating themselves.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; '''Gary Trousdale:''' We've always operated under the assumption that the gargoyles were kind of figments of Quasimodo's imagination. They didn't really move around, or did they? You know...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Kirk Wise:''' Yeah, we like leaving a little bit of a question mark; kind of like Harvey the rabbit or Calvin and Hobbes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Gary Trousdale:''' They're inanimate when anybody else comes in the room. They don't talk to anybody else, except the goat. So that's here we kind of crossed the line a little bit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Kirk Wise:''' We like to keep it a little bit iffy. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. So this matter could have less to do with the liberal agenda and more to do with poor writing. On a positive note, it is to be noted that the directors admitted that the implication that Hugo lusted after Djali was a line that even the directors admitted they shouldn't have crossed, which is a rarity ''especially'' in today's media where they are all for crossing said line.&lt;br /&gt;
|$100,138,851   &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Hunger Games]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Futuristic totalitarians plan titular annual televised &amp;quot;games&amp;quot; as punishment for the descendants of failed revolutionaries from a past uprising. Although technically a message against totalitarianism and for individualism, Leftist actor Donald Sutherland, who played President Snow, implied that the struggles of the films' protagonists were supposed to be derived from the Occupy Wall Street movement, and the book's author also indicated that the events of the book were based on the George W. Bush administration.&lt;br /&gt;
|$406,267,858&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Although the film does depict the Communists as bad guys (to such an extent that the Russian Communist Party in Moscow was angered by the decision), and implies that Indiana Jones is a Republican or at the very least an [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] fan, the film also depicts McCarthyism in a negative light, with one character implying that the American Government was simply being paranoid and denies there being a sizeable Communist infiltration in America.&lt;br /&gt;
|$786.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Iron Giant''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animation espouses anti-war themes and also brief but strong anti-hunting sentiments. Firearms in general are shown in a negative light, with the phrase &amp;quot;guns kill&amp;quot; being repeated a total of three times. The titular giant is called a &amp;quot;big gun that walks.&amp;quot; From a conservative viewpoint, he is a poor metaphor for a real gun; unlike a law-abiding citizen who is a gun owner, the giant has no choice in his actions because he is a war machine programmed with the inability to use his weapons for good, but only to use them thoughtlessly and senselessly. The story involves him learning to hide his weapons and &amp;quot;not be a gun&amp;quot;. The conclusion is that, in order to protect the public from an incoming missile, he must fly into it and kill himself rather than use his guns against it. As it is explained, &amp;quot;It's bad to kill, but it isn't bad to die.&amp;quot; In addition, despite being set during the Cold War, it largely downplays the Soviet menace that was occurring during that time, as the main antagonist, Kent Mansley, is a government agent (implied to be part of the NSA) investigating the titular Iron Giant who at one point while launching a tirade against Hogarth Hughes alludes to the possibility that the Communists may have been responsible for the Giant's creation as a means to destroy America and that they must destroy it before &amp;quot;it destroys us&amp;quot; and is treated negatively for it. Also features some foul language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That all being said, however, despite the definite anti-gun and anti-hunting themes, the film does portray the military in a fairly positive light, as General Rogarth was shown to be even-headed and only willing to use military force if confronted with evidence requiring for it, also making clear that he was not happy about bringing out an implied large military force for what was apparently a hoax, and while the military does try to attack the Iron Giant late into the film, it was only because they had been manipulated into doing so by Kent Mansley by the latter lying about the giant killing Hogarth Hughes, and only when confronted with evidence that Hogarth had in fact been alive did the military stand down. In addition, when Hogarth left to investigate evidence of a &amp;quot;martian&amp;quot; taking out an antenna, he saluted a photograph of his father, who was implied to have died during World War II. Also features a positive portrayal of the American icon Superman. There's also an anti-materialist message, as well as an implicitly Christian one, as Hogarth talks to the Giant about how humans and other forms of life possess souls that live on even after their mortal bodies die.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,732,614&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Iron Lady''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The British biopic of [[Conservative Party]] leader and 1979-90 [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|British Prime Minister]], Margaret Thatcher, showing the effects of conservative economic policy on Britain and helping to lift the country out of its recession. However, it also showed Margaret Thatcher in a somewhat negative light, depicting her in her later years as slightly addled.&lt;br /&gt;
|$80,554,188 (international including UK), $27,081,674 (US - domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|It promotes the concept of self-worth and individualism ultimately, and that choices do in fact matter and have consequences, and ultimately promotes faith to a certain extent. However, it also falsely teaches that humanism is what makes life worthwhile; marginalizes [[faith]] with a cartoonish depiction and demonizes capitalism as sadistic and greedy.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,300,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jaws''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-environmentalism film, the heroes are police chief Brody, WWII vet Quint, and Marine Biologist Hooper, who team up to take on a monstrous, man-eating great white shark. However, there is a part where (despite the warning) the Mayor keeps the beaches open for the sake of money, which some may say is an anti-capitalist statement. Notable for being one of the first summer blockbusters. It was followed by three sequels in 1978, 1983 and 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
|$260,000,000&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jaws.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Juno''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A pregnant teenage woman rejects [[abortion]] and decides for an adoptive birth instead. This movie pushes [[feminism]] and marginalizes the essential role of fatherhood.&lt;br /&gt;
|$143,492,840&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jurassic World''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Jurassic Park is now functioning and open for business, and the new boss is a woman, an obvious feminist message. Also the military is downgraded as they plan to weaponize dinosaurs. Despite all this, feminists weren't impressed and labeled it sexist&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/06/10/jurassic-world-a-big-dumb-sexist-mess.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and even liberal critics called the weaponizing dinosaurs plot asinine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thoughtcatalog.com/olos-nah/2015/06/ill-just-say-what-everyone-is-thinking-jurassic-world-is-terrible/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$652,270,625&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kiki's Delivery Service''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The film does show the value of hard work and is pro-capitalism (Kiki owns her own delivery business), but it also depicts feminism and witchcraft in a positive light. &lt;br /&gt;
|$18 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingdom of Heaven'' (director's cut)&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A story set in the Crusades period about a young knight. While the theatrical version was purely liberal media, the director's cut promotes fighting, honor, and duty, and portrays the noble Knights Hospitallers in a positive light. That being said, the movie still portrays the Knights Templar in a negative light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47,398,413&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingsman: The Secret Service''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-environmentalist, the villain attempts to eradicate the human race because of his belief in man-made global warming. Though the film is full of language and violence as well as a brief nudity scene. There's also one scene were one of the characters gets into a bloody fight with a group of Christians whom are portrayed as &amp;quot;racists&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$128,261,724&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Knocked Up''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Unemployed, immature and childish 23-year old Ben Stone (Seth Rogen) has a one-night stand with serious career woman Alison Scott (Katherine Heigl), with the unintended consequence of pregnancy. Alison's mother (Joanna Kerns) says she should get the pregnancy &amp;quot;[[abortion|taken care of]]&amp;quot;, while Ben's best friend Jonah (Jonah Hill) suggests that &amp;quot;I won't say the A-word, but it rhymes with abortion.&amp;quot; Alison decides to keep the child, while Ben decides to find a real job, grow up, and become a father.&lt;br /&gt;
|$148,768,917&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Lady and the Tramp]]'' (live-action remake)&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it contains the chivalry and capitalist themes from the original animated film. This both race and gender swapped live-action remake of the timeless animated classic of the same name shows the Democrat Jim Crow South of the early 1900s as a delusional and misleading multiethnic and multicultural paradise, with also totally legal interracial marriages. Compared to the animated counterparts, the animal characters are soulless, inexpressive, and unbearable if not even creepy to watch when they &amp;quot;talk&amp;quot;. Jim Dear, white here like in the source material, is legally married to Darling but here changed to a black American woman and with a black-mixed daughter named Lulu instead of a son named Jim, Jr.. Even Aunt Sarah is cast in black in this live-action version, and she loses the redeeming qualities she had in the original animated film. The neighbor dog and dear Lady's friend Jock is female here, while the antagonistic and mischievous Aunt Sarah's iconic female Siamese cats, Si &amp;amp; Am, are now two male Devon Rex cats named Devon &amp;amp; Rex, with a totally different and much less memorable musical number. The rat, &amp;quot;Herman&amp;quot;, is still the main villain and antagonist, but far less intimidating and scary-looking than the animated counterpart, and despite his musical theme being memorable, the same cannot be said for the final fight scene when compared to the animated version.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Legally Blonde''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A pro-feminist musical that also promotes every aspect of the &amp;quot;valley girl&amp;quot; lifestyle. Smart people (such as those who go to law school) are described as &amp;quot;boring, ugly, serious people&amp;quot; by the father of Elle Woods (the film's protagonist). It also contains hidden demeaning remarks about dark-haired people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, however, it does have an anti-LGBT agenda message as well, as two characters who were LGBT, Enrique Salvatore and Enid Wexlin, are depicted in an extremely negative light, as the former was discovered to have been committing perjury against the defendant by inferring that she slept with him for three months as part of an attempt to frame her for murder (with his &amp;quot;boyfriend&amp;quot; Chuck being implied to be party to the attempted perjury up until Enrique attempted to lie about his relationship to him), and the latter was depicted as an obnoxious individual who pushes radical feminism (including trying to change &amp;quot;semester&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;ovester&amp;quot; due to thinking semester meant &amp;quot;semen&amp;quot;), and eventually gets called out upon later in the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$96,520,674 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Legend of Frosty the Snowman''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Although this film is a bastardization of the original  [[Frosty the Snowman]] special in which it retcons almost everything to push an anti-comformity message and presents youth rebellion in a positive light. It does have a very strong message of honor thy father. The villain also attacks [[imagination]], after he becomes a corrupt politician. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The LEGO Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Large Government, with a message that anyone has the potential to be extraordinary. However is also anti-capitalist, and the main villain is Lord Business.&lt;br /&gt;
|$257,760,692&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lincoln''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Bio film on conservative icon [[Abraham Lincoln]], played wonderfully by Daniel Day-Lewis. Although overall very positive towards Lincoln and the Republican Party, it nonetheless downplays the role the Democrat Party played in the institution of slavery during the Civil War.&lt;br /&gt;
|$182,207,973&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|''Lionheart''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-family as Jean-Claude Van Damme plays Lyon Gaultier (nicknamed Lionheart) who becomes a street fighter to help pay his sister-in-law's expenses after her husband is killed. During this time he also tries to reconnect with his estranged family. However he gets into the country illegally, which some could point out is a pro-illegal immigration statement. &lt;br /&gt;
|$24,078,196&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lorax''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it has an environmentalist agenda, it also states that monopolies are wrong.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$214,030,500 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mulan''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The film has Liberals changing history to suit their feminist agenda, similar to what they did in Pocahontas, as well as some historical revisionism (In the film, the Huns are at war with China, even though this never happened, although that said, the name of the villain, Shan Yu, hints at them being Xiongnu). However, the central theme of [[Filial piety]] from the work it was based on, [[The Ballad of Mulan]], is still present ultimately, as the main reason Mulan joined the military was that her father suffered a severe injury that made him unfit for combat, and the film is pro-Military.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,620,254 	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Mufasa: The Lion King''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This prequel to 2019's ''The Lion King'' shows Mufasa's origin story, as Rafiki tells this to Simba's daughter Kiara. Mufasa is an orphaned lion cub who befriends another cub named Taka, who later becomes Scar. When a white lion named Kiros attacks their home, the brothers flee and make a journey towards a promised land called Milele, which would later be called the Pride Lands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On one hand, it does show a hint of feminism throughout the movie. Lionesses in real life are known to do most of the hunting for the pride, but the movie seems to hold them in higher favor than the males. Taka's father, Obasi, even gives his son terrible advice on how to be a king, such as being lazy and lying to his subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, the movie does portray family and friendship rather positively. Mufasa and Taka bond as brothers, and Taka's mother, Eshe, comes to care for Mufasa like another son. In the present, Simba is shown to be a good father to Kiara, telling her to be brave while he checks on Nala, who is giving birth to her second cub.&lt;br /&gt;
|$&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''P.C.U.''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|College students fight back against a campus where the administration promotes official [[diversity]] awareness weekends and radical [[feminism]], [[vegan]]ism, and [[political correctness]] run amok, but a conservative group on campus is also portrayed just as negatively as the P.C. groups.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,350,774&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Passion of the Christ]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Downplays the [[Resurrection]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original version of the film had no references at all to the Resurrection.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and strength of Christianity and omits powerful angels; instead exaggerates triumph of evil; film had little lasting effect on public or its producer; portrayed nails as through the hands rather than through the wrists as depicted by the [[Shroud of Turin]] and confirmed by modern science.&lt;br /&gt;
|$370,782,930&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pillow Talk''&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|A classic starring Rock Hudson and Doris Day in which conservative values triumph over liberal ones.  There are no distortions by feminist ideology.  Indeed, in one scene a leading man slaps the leading lady, but then is beaten up by dimwitted bystanders for it!&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,750,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''[[Pollyanna (1960 film)|Pollyanna]]''&lt;br /&gt;
| 1960&lt;br /&gt;
| G&lt;br /&gt;
| One of [[Walt Disney]]’s live-action classics stars an orphaned girl who now lives with her wealthy aunt Polly Harrington who is the de facto leader of the town (Harrington) due to her massive wealth and influence over the Church. Pollyanna herself helps the miserable and depressed find happiness again wether it’s the “glad game” or doing simple stuff to make rainbows with crystals. It promotes the idea of small town Americana, and social values with going to Church, and praying before eating. It also shows the town getting together to hold a bazar (hosted by the Church) to raise money for a new orphanage. That being said, the film opens with a nude boy swinging on a rope into a water hole.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,750,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Princess and the Frog''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals praised this film for featuring Disney's first African American princess but ignored the fact that it insults Christianity with Louisiana Voodoo, even replacing the traditional role of the fairy godmother with a blind voodoo priestess. On top of that, ''The Princess and the Frog'' is said to have stolen much of its plot from the film ''[[The Little Mermaid]]'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://crowdofstars.livejournal.com/14186.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That being said, however, it does depict traditional femininity in a positive light in the form of the side character Charlotte LeBoeuf, and is the first Disney animated feature film to have a positive depiction of traditional marriage since ''[[The Little Mermaid]]'' two decades prior. It's also debatable as to whether it promotes feminism, as aside from Charlotte LeBoeuf being depicted in a positive light overall as noted above, it implies at one point that Tiana achieving her dreams of being a CEO is ultimately a negative due to the main villain Dr. Facilier using that to tempt her into aiding him.&lt;br /&gt;
|$104,400,899&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pulp Fiction''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite saying the F-word in almost every sentence, the film (surprisingly) has a pro-Christian message as after being shot at, every bullet misses mob hit men Jules Winnfield and Vincent Vega. Winnfield believes it was a divine intervention and message from God to stop his life of crime. His partner doesn't believe this but it's later proven to be true as he perished later on in the movie. Also has sadomasochistic homosexuals as the bad guys. And (sort of) has an anti-drug message as mob boss's girlfriend Mia Wallace is seen also overdosing (a negative side to drugs) on heroin.&lt;br /&gt;
|$107,928,762 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Quick and the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A feminist  revisionist western. However strong message about honoring thy father. As the [[protagonist]] was led to justify the murder of her father, that she encountered as a little girl.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,636,537	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Rescuers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The villain in this movie is a capitalist pawn shop owner, who wants a rare diamond to make her rich, to add insult to injury they're Southerners. Also paints the United Nations in a positive light. On the other hand, the main villain is also a feminist, and the main human protagonist is shown praying for not only herself (even she has been kidnapped) but for all the kids in the orphanage (who have not been kidnapped). This is one of the by now rare Disney films feature a [[Christian]] character that's treated in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$29 million  	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Robin Hood''&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Animated Disney adaptation of the iconic story, depicting all of the characters as anthropomorphic animals. Although the story itself was based on [[Joseph Ritson]]'s revised version of the character that was in support of the Jacobin cause and thus was a liberal icon (steals from the rich, gives to the poor), the villain is Prince John who makes his money from taxes, suggesting Robin Hood is only giving money the government demanded back to people who actually worked for it. It also features a condemnation of government encroachment of the church, as a pivotal scene featured the Sheriff of Nottingham explicitly stealing a coin from the poor box and his later arresting Friar Tuck for trying to stop him, and the Sheriff's actions were clearly being framed in a horrible light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Rogue One: A Star Wars Story]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A group of freedom fighters undertake a dangerous mission in an attempt to steal the plans for the Galactic Empire's ultimate weapon, the Death Star. Unlike the previous Star Wars films, the focus of this one is on soldiers on the battlefield, their goal to restore liberty to the Galaxy. This gives the movie a strong feeling of American patriotism, and could also be argued to show respect to the U.S. military. However, the screenwriters Chris Weitz and Gary Whitta made tweets that implied that they were trying to push the leftist Diversity agenda just after Trump won the presidency, as well as used a customized version of the Rebel Starbird logo with a safety pin attached, and one of the main characters, Saw Gerrera, was stated to be based on Marxist revolutionary [[Che Guevara]] and was treated in a (comparably) positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,043,133,586&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Saw''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004-2010, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R (Director's Cuts are NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|The franchise contains an anti-nihilist message, with the antagonist, John Kramer, also known as &amp;quot;the Jigsaw Killer,&amp;quot; wishing for his victims to survive the &amp;quot;games&amp;quot; in which he places them, ultimately emerging with a better appreciation for their lives. For example, ''Saw'' condemns the adultery committed by Dr. Lawrence Gordon. ''Saw III'' focuses on the value of forgiveness, John having Jeff Denlon complete three tests involving the three people whom he blamed for the death of his young son. ''Saw IV'' contains a very strong message of letting go and letting people find salvation and redemption for themselves, an allusion to biblical passages about the subject. However, it could also be argued that Jigsaw is playing God with the value of human life, by bringing his test subjects to the very edge of death, forcing them to gravely hurt themselves, in order to survive. Furthermore, in ''Saw III'', one of his apprentices, Amanda Young, is revealed to have rigged traps to kill her victims, even if they successfully complete their games, as she no longer believes in Jigsaw's philosophy. However, John is shown clearly shown to be disgusted by Amanda's actions, though nevertheless trying to guide her to redemption, or at least his version of it. Other condemnations of nihilism include the clearly sociopathic depiction of corrupt Detective Mark Hoffman, the most important of Jigsaw's apprentices, as he, like Amanda, strays from John's philosophy and simply rigs traps to murder his victims, while also carrying out the games that John had planned before his death at the end of ''Saw III.''&lt;br /&gt;
|$953,421,276&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shame''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|While the movie shows [[Hollywood Values]], such as sex addiction, in a negative light and is clearly anti-[[homosexual agenda]], as the main character reaches his lowest point by partaking in such acts, the film is graphic in its nature leaving one to question how conservative it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,909,002 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Shark Tale]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes multiculturalism and the deuteragonist of the film is a great white shark who is a vegetarian. Besides for being pro-vegan it is also a metaphor for being homosexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gaylife.about.com/od/moviestheatre/a/sharktale.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However the film also has a strong pro-integrity message, where Oscar realized in the end he was wrong to lie to get to the top, and forsakes all the wealth he has acquired through his dishonesty. &lt;br /&gt;
|$160,861,908&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Simpsons]] Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This feature based upon the long-running animated sitcom portrays the liberal [[Environmental Protection Agency|EPA]] as a villainous and devious agency and the government in general as intrusive and corrupt. On the other hand, it celebrates [[environmentalism]] in the beginning, and Homer scoffs at people in Church for praying to &amp;quot;their phony-baloney God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$183,135,014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Soul Man''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A white student cheats the [[affirmative action]] system, by pretending to be black in order to get the scholarship he needs for to pay for Harvard. Towards the end, it is revealed he took the scholarship away from someone who needed it  as well (and is really black) because she has a son and is divorced at such a young age. The movie portyals the police as racist, and blames racism on many things, and seems to support the need for affirmative action. But on a conservative note, the film teaches the importance of hard work, and is also politically incorrect. &lt;br /&gt;
|$27,820,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Star Wars]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977-1983 (Original Trilogy); 1999-2005 (Prequel Trilogy); 2015-2019 (Sequel Trilogy)&lt;br /&gt;
|PG, PG-13 (Episode III &amp;amp; Episodes VII-IX)&lt;br /&gt;
|The well-known space opera series is mostly composed of simple truths about the triumph of good over evil, and in the case of ''Episode VI: Return of the Jedi'', redemption. However, ''Episode VI'' also contained some implied pro-[[Vietcong]] propaganda at George Lucas' behest via the Ewoks, as well as his later claiming that the entirety of the ''Star Wars'' saga from ''Episodes IV''-''VI'' was meant to be his means of protesting Vietnam (which is supported by a memo dating back to 1973 where he claimed the film was about &amp;quot;A large technological empire going after a small group of freedom fighters.&amp;quot; It is also to be noted that this was not the first time he voiced support for the Vietcong as well as used film to push an anti-American/anti-War agenda, as he also initially played a role in the filming of ''Apocalypse Now''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nypost.com/2014/09/21/how-star-wars-was-secretly-george-lucas-protest-of-vietnam/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), and the re-release for ''Episode IV: A New Hope'' also had an infamous edit where it made it seem as though Greedo shot at Han first, with George Lucas later revealing he did the edit (or rather, falsely claimed it was always that way) as a means to promote gun control. Regarding the pro-Vietcong sentiment being pushed in ''Return of the Jedi'', former president [[Richard Nixon]] in his 1985 book ''No More Vietnams'' cited ''Return of the Jedi'' as ultimately one reason why America, at least by that time, had initially felt so guilty of their strength that they were unwilling to use it even to defend their freedom and that of others.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''No More Vietnams'' by Richard Nixon, 1985&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Chapter 1:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;The assertion that our very bigness is badness has infested our culture to a surprising degree. The creator of the phenomenally successful Star Wars series recently explained that the climactic scene in one of his moves - in which the evil “Empire’s” giant war machines are destroyed by fuzzy little good guys with wooden bows and arrows - was inspired by the Vietnam experience. No matter that in Vietnam the Communist “good guys” packed Soviet automatic rifles and, in 1975, rode state-of-the-art Russian tanks across the South Vietnamese border. The propaganda of disproportionate forces in Vietnam, the myth of small/good versus big/bad, did enough damage to help lose the war for the United States and the people of South Vietnam. Today it is one symptom of the Vietnam syndrome to the extent that it makes Americans ashamed of their power, guilty about being strong, and forgetful about the need to be willing to use their power to protect their freedom and the freedom of others.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prequel trilogy also had some implied pot-shots at then-president George W. Bush and his War on Terror, and there was also an implied promotion of moral relativity in ''Revenge of the Sith'' (where Obi-Wan, when confronting Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader in the climax, stated in reply to Anakin's declaration that Obi-Wan is his enemy if he's not with him that &amp;quot;only a Sith deals in absolutes.&amp;quot;). A similar promotion of moral relativity and postmodernism was shown in ''Return of the Jedi'' where Obi-Wan admitted that his claim that Vader killed Anakin Skywalker was &amp;quot;true from a certain point of view,&amp;quot; as well as further elaborating his claim by stating that &amp;quot;[[Subjectivism|a great many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our point of view.]]&amp;quot; The same movie's ending also carries an implicit promotion of cannibalism. In addition, the Trade Federation and its motives in ''The Phantom Menace'' was crafted by George Lucas to be a negative response to the Republican Revolution of 1994, and in particular Newt Gingrich's Contract with America (with Gingrich himself being a partial namesake of the main villain, Viceroy Nute Gunray). ''Attack of the Clones'' and to a lesser extent ''Revenge of the Sith'' also had very blatant anti-war themes and a very negative portrayal of the military, as a large part of the plot involved creating a military for the republic (and in the case of ''Revenge of the Sith'', the near end of the Clone Wars), with the narrative strongly implying that even forming a military at all was somehow a threat to freedom. To a lesser extent, the Prequel trilogy also has a negative depiction of family values, since it's implied that even holding attachments to family or trying to start a family leads directly to turning to the Dark Side, with Yoda even stating that such acted as &amp;quot;the shadow of greed.&amp;quot; Lucas, in an interview with Time Magazine, also made similar jabs on family when explaining Anakin's character arc and his eventually becoming Darth Vader, where he said &amp;quot;Because he [Anakin Skywalker] gets attached to things...He can't let go of his mother...his girlfriend...things. It makes you greedy. And when you're greedy, you are on the path to the dark side because you fear that you're going to lose things. You fear you're not going to have the power you need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20020923140712/http://cgi.theforce.net/theforce/tfn.cgi?storyID=15712&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the director for ''Episode VII: The Force Awakens'', [[J.J. Abrams]], admitted in a press release that he deliberately made Finn black in order to ensure diversity among the characters, hinting at it pushing the leftist [[diversity]] agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnet.com/news/director-j-j-abrams-weighs-in-on-diversity-in-the-star-wars-universe/?_escaped_fragment_=#!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Two audience members jointly asked Abrams whether -- given his track record of helping build a diverse cast as director of the &amp;quot;Star Trek&amp;quot; reboot films -- he could confirm if there will be more Asian characters in the Star Wars universe. Asian characters are few and far between in the Star Wars franchise -- one appears in the original trilogy's last film, ''Return of the Jedi'', but for only four seconds before dying in a fiery explosion. Abrams said that while he won't be casting future films in the franchise, because he's directing only ''Episode VII'', he did include Asian characters in ''The Force Awakens'', which opened December 18. &amp;quot;I think it's important people see themselves represented in film,&amp;quot; Abrams said. &amp;quot;I think it's not a small thing.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also, the film also hints at a militant [[feminist]] agenda by having Leia act as general and Rey not allowing anyone to save her, something that conservative commentator John Nolte mentioned was a [[detraction]] for the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/12/17/star-wars-the-force-awakens-review-j-j-abrams-repents-for-the-sins-of-george-lucas/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, the ending award ceremony in ''A New Hope'' was deliberately modeled after the stadium scene from the infamous Nazi movie propaganda ''The Triumph of the Will''. Ian McDiarmid, the actor who played the saga's main villain [[Emperor Palpatine]], had also implied in an interview with ''The Guardian'' around the time ''Revenge of the Sith'' was released that George Lucas had deliberately made the films for primarily eight-year olds specifically to indoctrinate them into Lucas' leftist view of the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2005/nov/07/theatre1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;He [McDiarmid] also bristles at the notion that the Star Wars films are totally hollow entertainments. &amp;quot;I remember when I sat there in the Evil Emperor's swivel chair and George [Lucas] said things like 'does it remind you of the Oval office?' And I realised that at that time Richard Nixon was in his mind.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;And I see that in the Guardian's review of the DVD - not favourable, of course - mention is made of the fact that there are lines that sound really contemporary. But the reviewer decided that was by chance: no, no, no, no. Entirely by design.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;George knew that eight-year-olds, for whom these films are primarily intended, are very impressionable, and he wanted to make the right impression. So the whole film is about the unnecessary rise of fascism. In other words: watch out, they're all after your freedom, particularly when they're talking about defending freedom. Without getting over-extended about it, that is at the heart of these movies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Star Wars Episode VIII: The Last Jedi]] also received strong criticism for its apparent 'SJW' bias&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Toto, Christian (December 19, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/19/last-jedi-critics-mostly-conservative/ As ‘Star Wars’ fans cheer, conservative film critics point out problems with ‘Last Jedi’]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved December 20, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is also speculated that the leftist POV pushing caused fans to boycott the 2018 film [[Solo: A Star Wars Story]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/967205/Star-Wars-Han-Solo-FLOP-Last-Jedi-fan-BACKLASH-boycott-box-office-cast-sequel-cameo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; J.J. Abrams also heavily implied that the then-in-development final episode ''The Rise of Skywalker'' will feature homosexuals as part of &amp;quot;representation&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://variety.com/2019/film/news/star-wars-finn-poe-not-boyfriends-lgbtq-representation-1203423286/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which was ultimately confirmed in pre-release screenings, where two members of the Resistance, both female, engaged in an on-screen kiss while celebrating a major victory against the First Order.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/star-wars-rise-skywalker-features-franchise-s-first-same-sex-kiss-1263256&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$460,998,007&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Starship Troopers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it overall depicts the Military in a protagonistic light and arguably is pro-war and pro-military, the director of the film, Paul Verhoeven, implied it was actually supposed to push an anti-military, anti-war message where it implied that America during the Cold War were automatically fascists simply because they are entering war, and specifically stated it was &amp;quot;a natural evolution for post-World War II America.&amp;quot; In addition, to reinforce Verhoeven's message, he deliberately modeled various scenes after ''Triumph of the Will'' and other pro-Nazi propaganda scenes, as well as modeled the protagonists' uniforms after the uniforms utilized by the Nazis (i.e., the character Carl, played by Neil Patrick Harris, wearing a uniform that was modeled after the [[SS]]). When asked by Michael Ironside, who was one of the people who had a role in the movie and had read the original book, about why he made the movie despite Verhoeven's leftist politics, he answered &amp;quot;If I tell the world that a right-wing, fascist way of doing things doesn't work, no one will listen to me. So I'm going to make a perfect fascist world: everyone is beautiful, everything is shiny, everything has big guns and fancy ships, but it's only good for killing ******* bugs!&amp;quot; (note that fascism is not &amp;quot;right wing&amp;quot;, it is left wing, so Verhoeven's incorrect regarding which wing the Nazis/fascists were part of).&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,814,377 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sudden Death''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgraced fire fighter now becomes a laughingstock fire marshal uncovers a terrorist plot at a Hockey game plans to redeem himself and protect his children and the Vice President from said terrorists. However, they're not Islamic, which may have been because the film was trying to be politically correct.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,350,171 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Super''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A short-order cook becomes a superhero after a vision from God. He frequently turns to prayer and a Christian television show for guidance. Even though his wife leaves him for a drug dealer, he remains loyal to her for the whole picture.  At the same time, foul language, violence, and brief nudity scenes are included.&lt;br /&gt;
|$327,716 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Team America: World Police''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|While it is clearly pro-military, pro-America, and anti-Hollywood, the movie is riddled with liberal values, including toilet humor and vulgar language throughout.  The movie's foul-mouthed theme song favors abortion, slavery, pornography, and Democrats, while having no positive reaction to Republicans, which makes sense because the screenplay was written by the creators of ''[[South Park]]'' and ''The Book of Mormon''.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32,786,074&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Terminator''&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|R &lt;br /&gt;
|Takes the side of humanity in this man vs machine battle, and the protagonist Sarah Connor is depicted in a traditionally feminine manner. However, it is anti-war, anti-Capitalist and comes from liberal atheist James Cameron, in which he imagines the military being the cause of the downfall of man.&lt;br /&gt;
|$78.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Terminator 2: Judgement Day''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The second film in the Terminator Franchise by Liberal director James Cameron. While it does have anti-war and anti-capitalist themes, and also dabbles in pro-feminist views via Sarah Connor's change in overall character, it is also pro-family. John Connor reconnects with his mother and the Terminator who serves as his protector becomes like a father to him, so much so that John cries when the Terminator chooses to sacrifice himself to ensure that Skynet would never be built.&lt;br /&gt;
|$523.7 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Titanic]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Every life has value, and the most powerful men give up their seats on lifeboats to women and children first, while the media and a young [[RINO]] are rightly criticized. The film broke the record in movie revenues before the environmentalist nightmare that was ''Avatar''. However, ''Titanic'' gives some hints at a pro-socialist view, and a key scene involving Rose being drawn in the nude could be evocative of pornography.&lt;br /&gt;
|$600,779,824&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Toxic Avenger''&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Produced by liberal Lloyd Kaufman and his independent company Troma Entertainment, this film contains graphic violence, sex, nudity, and profanity. It also promotes environmentalism, with the fictional town of &amp;quot;Tromaville&amp;quot; called &amp;quot;the toxic waste dumping capital of the world&amp;quot; by the narrator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it also has messages of anti-bullying, anti-crime, and anti-corruption. The protagonist is Melvin Ferd, a scrawny guy who works as a janitor and the local gym and gets pushed around by a bully named Bozo. Bozo and his friends conspire to humiliate Melvin, which ends up with Melvin in a pink tutu and falling head first into a barrel of toxic waste. The chemicals mutate him into a large, deformed mutant with superhuman strength. Melvin, adopting the superhero name &amp;quot;Toxie&amp;quot; then goes around Tromaville fighting crime including: attacking a gang of thugs beating up a police officer who refuses to take a bribe, protecting a Mexican restaurant from an armed robbery and saving a young blind woman named Sara (who becomes Toxie's love interest) from being raped, and rescuing a 12-year-old prostitute from her evil pimp. Tromaville's leadership is shown to be extremely corrupt, with mayor Peter Belgoody who collaborates with the criminals, and the Chief of Police who is a literal Nazi, hinting at an anti-government corruption message. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Trainspotting]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It's been debatable if the film is anti-drug.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,491,080&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''U-571''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Had a plot which was based on the first capture of a [[German]] [[Enigma machine]] in [[World War Two]]. Despite the film being patriotic to America, the facts are wrong as the Enigma machine was captured by the [[British]] in 1941 prior to the Americans entering the war. &lt;br /&gt;
|$77,122,415&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Twilight Saga''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008-2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Starred by anti-military liberal [[Kristen Stewart]] and glorifies [[vampire|vampires]], but it also makes fun of [[public school culture]] and [[modernism]] while promoting [[abstinence]] until marriage, traditional courtship and marriage, and the [[pro-life]] movement. It was written by a [[Mormon]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,365,922,346&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Van Helsing'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Thanks to [[Hollywood values]], Van Helsing isn't portrayed as the Christian character he should be, but the film still gets its good vs. evil message across. As well as portraying the Catholic Church, and Christianity in a positive light. The director Stephen Sommers has made conservative films ''The Mummy Returns'' and ''G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra'' though.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,177,084&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=vanhelsing.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Wall-E''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie shows the dangers of big government (BNL), however it is also anti-capitalist and pro-environmentalism as BNL is a corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
|$223,808,164 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Way We Were''&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Unique in the way that it appears liberal to liberals while unintentionally sending a [[conservative]] message to young women. Stars uber-liberal [[Barbra Streisand]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$49,919,870&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''We're the Millers''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A drug dealer, stripper, runaway, and average loser pretend to be a family to sneak marijuana out of Mexico. However, they learn the value and importance of family. The villains of the movie are all drug gang men, the film also features a stripper scene, and whether or not the film is anti-drug in the end is debatable.&lt;br /&gt;
|$150,394,119&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Yours Mine and Ours''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The widower father of a conservative family marries a widowed mother of a liberal family. Their two difference lifestyles contradict with each other, and the film does not really decide whose lifestyle is better. On the one hand, at one point, the liberal children fool the conservative children into thinking there is a house fire, so they can have the bathrooms for themselves. On the other hand, the children work together in another scene and use conservative tactics to end bullying without the help of an authority figure. In the end, the children learn to put their differences aside and realize that family is what matters more.&lt;br /&gt;
|$53,412,862&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add more!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Worst Liberal Snubs]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Worst Liberal TV Shows]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cinema]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worst Liberal Movies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Worst Liberal Movies}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Worst_Liberal_Movies&amp;diff=2199050</id>
		<title>Essay:Worst Liberal Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Worst_Liberal_Movies&amp;diff=2199050"/>
		<updated>2026-07-10T04:05:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: summarily execute, i.e., without trial&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{See also|Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies}}.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--If anyone is going to add ''Frozen'' to this list, do NOT assert that based on its supposedly imposing the [[homosexual agenda]]. John Nolte already confirmed on Breitbart that it does not do so in any way.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Trump-tweet-hollywood-and-hunt-movie (1).jpg|right|355px|President Trump voicing outrage towards Hollywood elites in response to the release of ''The Hunt'',  a film depicting conservatives being hunted by liberals for sport.]]&lt;br /&gt;
NOTE: We at ''Conservapedia'' do not care if a movie is considered a &amp;quot;classic&amp;quot;, or if is a famous movie for which many have nostalgia. If it has [[liberal bias]], then we call it out. Just because people love movies does not mean that [[Hollywood]] isn't trying to push a liberal agenda with them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While a good amount of [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies|great conservative films]] are produced every year, [[Hollywood values|Hollywood]] continues to produce, en masse, films that attempt to normalize and aggrandize immoral lifestyles and liberal bias. Below is a list of some of the more outrageous examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politically Liberal Live-Action Films==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The 5th Wave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The military consists of evil aliens in what was overall a failed franchise that couldn't get on the recent young adult book-to-film bandwagon.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34,912,982&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alien'' Franchise&lt;br /&gt;
|1979-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This pro-feminist, anti-capitalist film franchise was originated by [[atheist]] Ridley Scott. The first film was proven to be alarmingly similar to the 1965 film ''Planet of the Vampires'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzToy-Tjz5g&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but since it fitted the left's agenda, they didn't care and gave it biased reviews anyway. The second film, ''Aliens'', is an anti-Vietnam statement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T543J2L-gXU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and, just like its predecessor, copies another previous feature (in this case, the 1954 film ''Them!''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVoX-C9J4Zk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
|$515,930,723 (all together)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''All the Way''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|TV-14&lt;br /&gt;
|The 2016 HBO film based on the presidency of Democrat [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] is a good example of a historical revisionist film, palatable for liberals' regressive dominion of the media. Liberals seized the opportunity with the film to distort history in order to hold Johnson in high regard and also ignored many of the President's faults, including his racism, the War on Poverty and how it created a welfare state which, by design, destroyed untold numbers of African American families.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Assault on Wall Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Uwe Boll (often referred to as the worst director of this generation and known for his furious, vulgar, and spiteful responses to negative reception)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Uwe-Boll-considered-one-of-the-worst-film-directors-in-history&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BvLQb2uwW4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; makes one of the most historically inaccurate modern films that blames capitalism for the [[Recession of 2008|Great Recession]] and the downfall of the everyday man's life. The film plays out like an angry middle school boy's fan fiction revenge story, in which all the bankers are summarily executed (as in the [[Russian Revolution]]). Boll has said how &amp;quot;We need to ****ing kill the rich&amp;quot;, which only shows how uneducated he is.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQJwEAqzFs4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Apocalypse Now''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This overindulgent, anti-war diatribe portrays the American military as corrupt, incompetent [[drug addiction|drug-users]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$78,784,010&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battleship Potemkin''&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This silent Communist film heralds the Soviet Revolt on the Tsarist Russian battleship ''Potemkin''. When mutinying, the sailors murder a Christian chaplain aboard, which is shown as an act of &amp;quot;heroism&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battle for Haditha'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film criticize American war against Islamic terrorism in Iraq and showing American soldiers as monsters.&lt;br /&gt;
|$245,521&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beauty and the Beast'' (2017 live-action remake)&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|On the one hand, the 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' is another victim in the film trend of needlessly and shamelessly remaking animated films or children's stories for the sake of earning easy revenue and capitalizing on current film trends in the modern, soulless Hollywood studio system. Liberals also seized the opportunity with the remake to exploit diversity and promote some liberal values within the ''Beauty and the Beast'' universe (to be noted that the story takes place in France in the 1700s, if not even before). The final result of the diversity inclusion in the cast of characters is that it feels self-congratulatory in the sense of putting it all in for the sake of having it, rather than having it be just a part of the story and the film. One notable example is the filmmakers' decision to make LeFou, Gaston's diminutive and bumbling sidekick, a homosexual who is conflicted with his feelings for Gaston (although it should be noted that in the actual script, it was never actually specified that LeFou was homosexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/entertainthis/2017/03/03/josh-gad-lefou-beauty-and-the-beast/98679284/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). This resulted in AFA's One Million Moms division responding to the change by calling for a boycott of the movie. At the end of the film, LeFou is shown taking a romantic interest in a musketeer who is now a transgender woman after being transformed into one during Gaston's siege of the Beast's castle. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not only is it an atrocious and needless artistic decision of the filmmakers to needlessly incorporate diversity simply for the sake of it, but the 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' also serves as an example that liberals can legitimately shoehorn the [[homosexual agenda]] into Disney films. Adding salt to the wound, the filmmakers also further changed history to suit their feminist agenda, similar to previous Disney films like ''Mulan'' (1998), ''Pocahontas'' (1995) and ''The Princess and the Frog'' (2009) (most infamously, the villagers are shown to be explicitly intolerant of Belle learning how to read and teaching girls to do the same, smashing her washing machine in the process, despite the fact that the namesake for the village in this film, Mdm. Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve, the original author for the fairy tale, was herself a woman). The 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' is now even more of a feminist propaganda film than the 1991 animated film version ever was. There were also hints at an anti-war message due to Gaston being turned into a war veteran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, there were also several surprisingly Conservative messages in the film, significantly more than in the 1991 version. Namely, Christianity is treated in a far more positive light in this film than in the 1991 version as one of the few friends Belle has in this version is the village Chaplain named Pere Robert who is shown to be sympathetic to her bibliophilic nature and also attempts to prevent Maurice from being sent to the Asylum, and later is shown to be horrified at the formation of the mob against the Beast (it is to be noted that in the original 1991 film, the character in question was merely a bookseller, not a priest, and most of the villagers, implied to be devout Christians, were demonized in the film), which was also surprisingly accurate to history despite the aforementioned changing of history in the film (in real history, Christianity, especially the Catholic Church, actively encouraged literacy, writing, and arithmetic among both genders, with girls being taught in convents or at the home). In addition, Maurice actually is shown to be more proactive in this film, such as directly refusing Gaston's attempt at marrying Belle and even attempting to expose Gaston as an attempted murderer and psychopath, and also plays a direct role in saving Belle and himself from the paddywagon after she exposes Beast to the villagers (in the original film, although he does set out to try and find Belle and save her after trying to get the villagers to help failed, he ultimately required saving by her due to catching an illness during his trek, and ultimately needed saving alongside Belle via Chip). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, Lumière as well as the featherduster (named Plumette in this version) are shown to be an actual loving couple (in the original film, this was just hinted, although Lumière seemed more of a womanizer and the featherduster sexually loose), and the remake also doesn't demonize traditional marriage (notably, the remake cut out Gaston's inappropriate wedding proposal as well as Belle shoving Gaston into mud in front of attendees). The forgiveness and redemption theme was also significantly more emphasized in the remake, due to Beast ultimately forgiving Maurice after learning why he had tried to steal the rose and even allowing Belle to save Maurice specifically to make up for his past behavior, with Maurice also forgiving Beast upon Belle showing him the baby rattle. It is also shown to be significantly more pro-family as well, as not only is Belle shown to be loyal to her father like in the 1991 original, but as noted above, Maurice himself took measures to protect Belle and notably agreed with Belle that Gaston would not have worked out for her (originally, Maurice also thought Gaston was alright for her), and he also was shown to be very protective of Belle after his wife had died from the plague, with Belle's mom specifically sacrificing herself by telling them to leave her behind to allow Belle a healthy life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the triplets (renamed to &amp;quot;Village Lasses&amp;quot;) in the remake were depicted as having haughtiness, arrogance, being jealous of Belle, as well as overall being nasty people, including briefly smirking at Belle when she was locked up in the paddy wagon as well as being actively involved in the arrest of Maurice as well as the later attack on Beast's castle (in the original film, the triplets were not shown to have any negative behavior to them besides their crushing on Gaston [not participating in the later arrest of Maurice, let alone the attack on Beast's castle shortly afterward during the climax, and also implying at one point that they were willing to give their blessing to Gaston marrying Belle when Belle refused him in the beginning of the film, and while they were present during the final lyrics for the Gaston reprise where Gaston explicitly divulged key details for his blackmail plan, the way it was framed could easily be interpreted as the triplets genuinely not knowing about the plan due to their absence from Maurice's arrival up to the scene where Gaston whispers the plan to LeFou.], and it is also heavily implied that they supported traditional marriage and were demeaned in the film by being referred to in the script as The Bimbettes and treated as dumb blondes for this reason). In addition, according to the film's director Bill Condon as well as one of the triplets' actresses, Rafaelle Cohen, the reason the triplets were intensely jealous and spiteful of Belle was because their mother neglected them while doting on Belle, showcasing the dangers of parental neglect.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Big Green''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie had one of the characters blame &amp;quot;Reaganomics&amp;quot; for the lack of job opportunities in the town and also one of the team's players was an anchor baby.  In the end, one of the coaches, who was a sheriff in Texas, was able to get the player and his illegal mother a way to stay.  So it was also favorable toward illegal immigration.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$17,736,619&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Birth of a Nation''&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|This infamously racist film, the longest feature ever made at the time, begins by documenting the [[American Civil War]], then depicts the [[Ku Klux Klan]] as &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot; who vanquish people of color, who are outrageous black racial stereotypes, from political positions and from their lawful right to vote (the KKK was founded by the Democrat Party, even though the Left has repeatedly tried denying and covering up the connection between the two). It was the first ever film to be shown at the White House under Democrat segregationist President [[Woodrow Wilson]], and it significantly influenced his already-racist core to segregate the White House and various departments.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blue State''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|What looks like a romantic comedy actually encourages the false idea that [[liberalism]] must be established and conservatism abolished in America, as the main character follows up on his absurd vow to move to Canada if [[George W. Bush]] is re-elected president.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bob Roberts''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-conservative propaganda piece, directed by leftist Tim Robbins and released during the 1992 election, has a similar premise to that of ''The Candidate'' and denigrates conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,479,470&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Borat''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal shock jock Sacha Baron Cohen falsely portrays American conservatives as uneducated racists.&lt;br /&gt;
|$67,800,000&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Borat Subsequent Moviefilm''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sacha Baron Cohen goes a step further making a pro-Biden propaganda film. He tries to blame [[COVID-19]] on [[Donald Trump]], and falsely accuses him of being a [[fascist]]. He makes matters worse when he harasses [[Mike Pence]] and [[Rudy Giuliani]], and falsely portrays them as pedophiles.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Born on the Fourth of July''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This radically anti-[[Vietnam War]] biographical film was produced and directed by Communist sympathizer and twice wounded Vietnam War veteran Oliver Stone, starring Tom Cruise as paralyzed Vietnam War vet-turned-anti-Vietnam War leftist protester and Communist sympathizer [[Ron Kovic]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,001,698&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bushwick''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|TV-MA&lt;br /&gt;
|The dystopian thriller features Red State dwellers (depicted as racist) declaring war on Hipster Brooklyn.&lt;br /&gt;
|N./A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Butler''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Ronald Reagan]] is falsely portrayed as indifferent toward apartheid in South Africa; Nancy Reagan is played by anti-American traitor Jane Fonda, and staunch feminist Oprah Winfrey plays Cecil's wife.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$116,632,095&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Call Jane''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-abortion, anti-family, and pro-feminism. Another Hollywood attempt to destroy America that thankfully backfired.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Candidate''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; fails to be a political satire as it fails to lampoon both sides of the coin and supports [[George McGovern]] at every turn. It was released during the 1972 election year as a smear campaign against [[Richard Nixon]] and his conservative colleagues. Conservative star [[James Stewart]] refused to star in it for that reason&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068334/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Capitalism: A Love Story]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Moore, staying true to his propaganda film format, relentlessly attacks America's [[capitalist]] [[economy]] with claims of alleged financial inequality.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,363,397&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Casualties of War''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-Vietnam war statement film starring Sean Penn involves a gang of American soldiers raping a Vietnamese woman. This paints America soldiers as the bad guys while failing to acknowledge how the Viet Cong, Khmer Rouge, and other Communist Insurgents did the same thing to a far larger scale.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,671,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Che''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008; 2009&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the name, the film is a two-part biopic for the Argentine [[Marxist]] terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]], who is blindly treated sympathetically as a &amp;quot;martyr&amp;quot; for [[Communism]] in the West.&lt;br /&gt;
|US$40.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The China Syndrome''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A fictional [[nuclear power]] plant melts down. The film greatly over-hypes this risk of a [[nuclear accident]] (or meltdown) and the resultant damage. This film, along with the [[Three Mile Island]] incident (which occurred shortly after the film's release), are both credited for killing the nuclear power industry in America.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,718,367&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Contender''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This film about the 2000 presidential election is little more than a pro-[[Al Gore]] propaganda piece by liberal studio executives and [[Hollywood values]]. Conservative star Gary Oldman also told IGN that the film was supposed to be apolitical, but it was edited to vilify Republicans&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ign.com/articles/2001/02/26/interview-with-gary-oldman&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$17,872,723&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Das Boot''&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-American war film looks at [[World War II]] from the Nazi perspective.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,487,676&lt;br /&gt;
|-   &lt;br /&gt;
|''Dawn of the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Besides containing outbursts of graphic violence, this stand-alone sequel to George A. Romero's ''Night of the Living Dead'' is against capitalism because the consumers are zombies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9487PyyblpQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 2004 Zack Snyder-directed remake abandoned this. &lt;br /&gt;
|$55 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Day of the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal scientists who plan to tame zombies are the &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot;, while the common-sense conservative soldiers (whose plan is to euthanize them all) are the &amp;quot;villains&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
|$5,000,000 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dead Man Walking'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It senselessly criticizes [[capital punishment]] with an ending that left some liberal viewers even more confused.&lt;br /&gt;
|$39,363,635&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Devil's Backbone''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes the Communistic Spanish Loyalists in the Spanish Civil War as &amp;quot;good guys&amp;quot; while demonizing [[Francisco Franco]]'s forces. These themes, promoted by Marxist director Guillermo del Toro, were later expanded upon in ''Pan's Labyrinth''.&lt;br /&gt;
|US$6.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Dictator]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A Middle Easterner takes over America in this raunchy, vulgar &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; straining for controversy.&lt;br /&gt;
|$59,650,222&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dogville'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An [[Anti-American]] propaganda film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,680,836&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb''&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Loosely based on Peter George's 1958 thriller novel ''Red Alert'', this black comedy is against war, the military, and nuclear weaponry and tries to downplay the seriousness of Cold War-era fears of a nuclear apocalypse.&lt;br /&gt;
|$9.4 million in North America&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The East is Red''&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|A Communist Chinese dance epic made during the Cultural Revolution. This was made with direct input of Mao Zedong himself. The film depicts Mao as the &amp;quot;savior&amp;quot; of China, and has many typical pro-Communist messages one would expect.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Eternal Jew''&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda film was made with direct input from [[Adolf Hitler]], who made sure the anti-Semitism was as blunt and direct as possible. Most audiences were shocked at the crudity of the messages.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fahrenheit 9/11'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A [[Michael Moore]] movie, which distorts the tangential link between the [[Bush]] family and the [[Bin Laden]] family. The title was also taken from ''[[Fahrenheit 451]]'', a book that warned people about book burnings, proving that not only do liberals steal titles from other works, but aren't even creative on how to have the titles directly connect to their works.&lt;br /&gt;
|$119,194,771&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fair Game''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another Bush bash flick starring [[Communist]] Sean Penn. 2010 film rehashes the lead up to the [[Iraq War|war in Iraq]] and [[Valerie Plame]]'s role. It's a typical un-American Hollywood film with &amp;quot;The [[narrative]] that [[Karl Rove]] and [[Dick Cheney]]'s Chief of Staff [[Scooter Libby]] were nefarious behind-the-scenes players intent on destroying innocent reputations while pushing the nation into war on false pretenses.&amp;quot; There's also no mention of Iraq Liberation Act which was signed by [[Bill Clinton]] five years before the war in Iraq. &lt;br /&gt;
|$9,540,691&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fire Down Below''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Steven Seagal plays a Gary Stu-like role in this environmentalist feature.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,228,448&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Frost/Nixon]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the title, it attempts to further tarnish the reputation of [[Richard Nixon]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,622,031&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Game Change''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal]] haters play [[conservative]]s in an [[HBO]] film about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain]] and Palin denounced the film, and called it fiction.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''God Bless America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite its name, the movie is a rip-off of the conservative film ''Falling Down''. This &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; has a miserable man and his foul-mouthed [[nihilist]] girl sidekick summarily execute [[Tea Party]] members, a [[Fox News]]-like host, Christians, and other conservative stereotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$123,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Good Shepherd''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite covering the founding of the CIA, the film was extremely anti-CIA in its messaging, where it doubles down on making the CIA look as bad as possible and overemphasizes on CIA failures such as the Bay of Pigs invasion and their experimenting with LSD, while conveniently ignoring the crimes the KGB and similar intelligence agencies within the Soviet bloc.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$99.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Green Zone''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Is extremely anti-War on Terror to such an extent that it comes across as blatantly anti-American, as it repeats the falsehood that Pentagon officials lied about there being WMDs in Iraq simply so they could gin up a war in the Middle East (completely ignoring that various other intelligence agencies, including even France, a country that didn't even want a War with Iraq, acknowledging that Saddam had WMDs), and even had the main villain, who was modeled after Donald Rumsfeld, sending assassination teams against those in the know about the conspiracy. The film even went as far as to portray Iraqi terrorists as the &amp;quot;good guys&amp;quot;. The film was also notorious as being Universal Studios' biggest box office bomb as a result.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/3/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$94.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Heaven's Gate''&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite the Christian sounding name. This notorious box office bomb comes from Marxist filmmaker Michael Cimino portrays America as the villain in the Johnson County War, has an anti-capitalist rhetoric, and features a pro-illegal immigration message. Furthermore, it glamorizes [[sexual immorality|prostitution and adultery]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hidden Agenda''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the [[IRA]] oppressed freedom fighters while painting the Unionists as monsters. The film also doesn't speak highly of [[Margaret Thatcher]] either.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Hunt''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based in part on the 1924 short story ''The Most Dangerous Game'' but given a modern political twist, focusing on conservatives from different walks of life being rounded up and hunted for sport by rich elitist liberals. Wikipedia claims in its article about the movie that it is &amp;quot;satire&amp;quot; and, in the article, stated that the movie drew criticism from members of the conservative media as an &amp;quot;alleged&amp;quot; portrayal of liberals hunting supporters of Donald Trump (with the term &amp;quot;alleged&amp;quot; inserted in the article in an attempt to brush off and dismiss said criticism), but it is simply Hollywood elites engaging in thinking out loud about what they wish to do to those who don't agree with or support their leftist political/social groupthink.  The movie drew high-profile criticism from none other than President Trump, who used it to criticize Hollywood for its racism, hatred and promotion of violence in the media, which it then uses inflammatorily to blame others and create chaos,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/08/09/donald-trump-thunders-against-racist-hollywood-they-create-violence-then-try-to-blame-others/ Donald Trump Thunders Against Racist Hollywood: &amp;quot;They Create Violence, Then Try to Blame Others&amp;quot;] at Breitbart News Network&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while conservative author [[David Horowitz]] called for the movie not to be released, stating that it may serve only to incite easily-influenced leftists to commit violence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/david-horowitz-racism-the-hunt-liberal/2019/08/08/id/927939/ David Horowitz to Newsmax TV: Left Seeks to 'Exterminate'] at Newsmax&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The movie was subsequently withdrawn from release by distributor Universal Pictures in the wake of the recent mass shootings in [[El Paso Walmart shooting|El Paso]] and [[Dayton nightclub shooting|Dayton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcJGfYiUDDE Universal Studios pulls the movie ''The Hunt''] at Fox News YouTube channel&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was eventually recut, with the trailers making clear that the rich elitist liberals are intended to be the villains&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2020/02/the-hunt-returns-with-a-trailer-making-it-known-liberal-elites-are-the-bad-guys/102988/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,812,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''I, Tonya''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|History revisionist film that paints criminal Tonya Harding as a victim, reframing the narrative around her implication in the crime of attacking Nancy Kerrigan as justified&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/971183001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2018/01/i_nauseated_the_oregonians_for.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. There's also an anti-family theme, as Harding's mother is falsely portrayed as psychologically abusive, despite the fact that she was nothing like that in real life&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://people.com/movies/tonya-harding-mother-monster-friend/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$53 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Independence Day: Resurgence''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it is the sequel to the patriotic and, to a certain extent, conservative film ''Independence Day'', it does not at all reference the concepts of patriotism, American exceptionalism, or even national sovereignty. Instead, most of the movie seems to support globalism, and Doctor Okun is revealed to be a homosexual despite such never being implied in the original film. Forced [[multicultural]] elements are present as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$389.7 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''JFK''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This historically inaccurate account on [[President John F. Kennedy]]'s assassination serves liberal filmmaker Oliver Stone's insanely fanatic conspiracy theories. For example, the filmmaker pinpoints the blame to the &amp;quot;real murder&amp;quot; of Kennedy: the conservative politicians, the U.S. Military, and then-Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, all of whom want America to go to war in Vietnam because Kennedy rejected the American involvement. Stone described the film as a &amp;quot;counter-myth&amp;quot; to the Warren Commission's &amp;quot;fictional myth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,405,498&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''John Q''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This laughably inaccurate portrayal of the American healthcare system depicts private healthcare executives as heartless, and uses manipulative melodrama to promote socialized medicine. It also attacks the [[second amendment]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lolita'' (1997 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The second film to be based on Vladimir Nabokov's infamous novel, the first being by Stanley Kubrick. However, in contrast to the very tame Kubrick version (limited only by the censorship of it's day), this version indulges with the gratuitous sexuality that made the book so controversial. The story portrays the relationship of Lolita and Humbert as a beautiful romance. Also, as implied by the tagline of the film's poster, the main message is that &amp;quot;Age is Just a Number&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lone Ranger''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This attack on [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]] portrays the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as &amp;quot;thugs&amp;quot; who support their actions. It distorts the messages of its source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV and radio serials, as dumbfounded and unintelligent, instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot-smoker]] [[Johnny Depp]]) not only as the &amp;quot;star&amp;quot; of the film, but as the Lone Ranger's &amp;quot;voice of reason&amp;quot;, too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$89,302,115&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Love, Simon''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This coming-of-age film is an attempt by Hollywood to create a &amp;quot;family friendly&amp;quot;, pseudo-conservative take on the gay romance genre. While in theory this sounds less objectionable than most offerings of this kind, it could also be considered more deceptive and dangerous. This is because it obscures the uglier, raunchier aspects of the gay lifestyle in order to create a very misleading, &amp;quot;heartwarming&amp;quot; fantasy of gay life and relationships.&lt;br /&gt;
|$66.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Magnificent Seven'' (2016 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This remake of a Western about seven [[vigilante]] gunfighters out to save a peaceful Mexican farming village from marauders (itself an adaptation of the Japanese cinematic classic ''Seven Samurai'') suits the left agenda, as capitalists are the &amp;quot;villains&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://missliberty.com/magnificent-seven-remake-is-angry-radical-fantasy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$93,145,387&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Manderlay'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[James Caan]] refused to star in this anti-American sequel to ''Dogville'', describing director Lars von Trier as anti-American and stated that he himself is an &amp;quot;ultra-conservative&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$674,918&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Matrix'' series&lt;br /&gt;
|1999 (''[[The Matrix]]''); 2003 (''The Matrix Reloaded'' and ''The Matrix Revolutions''); 2021 (''The Matrix Resurrections'')&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A hacker discovers his world is a replica of the world as it was before a cataclysmic future event in which intelligent machines took over humanity, so he joins a resistance to end the machines' reign. Despite this salvation narrative, the whole trilogy glorifies anarchism and [[nihilism]] (even including a brief nod to [[Jean Baudrillard]]'s &amp;quot;On Nihilism&amp;quot; chapter from Simulacra and Simulation), hinting several times towards a pro-Communist, anti-American (with one scene in the first film, when Thomas Anderson meets Agent Smith, having Anderson's dossier listing Anderson as hailing from &amp;quot;FU, USA&amp;quot; which not-so-subtly is meant to say &amp;quot;[Censored] You, USA&amp;quot;), [[anti-Christian]] view. The second film's Architect scene tries to give a &amp;quot;devastating critique/twist&amp;quot; to salvation myths, with the Architect as a malevolent allegorical substitute for the Christian [[God]]. In this same scene, a panel of screens implicitly compares [[George W. Bush]] to Hitler during a discussion of evil in the world, and it features wars and conflicts specifically involving America. In fact, far-[[leftist|Left]] [[race-baiting]] scholar Cornel West was hired to play a role in the film specifically because the [[The Wachowskis|Wachowski Brothers]] (as they were known at the time) were influenced by his pro-socialist/Communist and anti-American rhetoric. The first film's throwaway dialogue between the main villain Agent Smith and the treasonous freedom fighter Cipher is a shallow attempt at insulting [[Ronald Reagan]] because Smith implies that Cipher will become the next Ronald Reagan should he succeed in betraying his allies to the agents. The trilogy's overall depiction of religion is closer to Gnosticism, even with Neo, the main protagonist, presented as a savior-figure. The Wachowskis openly admitted in an interview that they deliberately modeled the entire story after Friedrich Nietzche's writings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.equip.org/article/the-matrix-unloaded-revelations/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peter Bart, “Cracking the Wachowski’s Code,” Variety.com, May 25, 2003.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The trilogy has been cited as the cause for various murders, ultimately leading to a variant of the [[insanity defense]] known as the Matrix Defense&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/21/ctv.matrix.insanity/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and it shares similar themes to the [[Worst Liberal Video Games|Worst Liberal Video Game]] ''Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty'' because Hideo Kojima confessed that he intended to use the same themes for the game.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20130328062143/http://www.gamespot.com/news/hideo-kojima-speaks-about-the-matrix-2448486&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A fourth movie was announced to be in the works.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/08/the-wachowskis-announce-the-matrix-4-is-in-the-works/91350/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The movies overall had several hints at a Marxist (and even Maoist) outlook,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/1408419/posts?page=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which was later confirmed by Larry Wachowski, or rather, Lilly Wachowski, who stated that &amp;quot;she&amp;quot; created the trilogy &amp;quot;out of a lot of anger and a lot of rage, and it's rage at capitalism and corporatized structure and forms of oppression.&amp;quot;, as well as overall as an extension of &amp;quot;her&amp;quot; angst at the &amp;quot;oppression&amp;quot; of [[Gender confusion|being born male instead of female]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lilly-wachowski-shares-how-matrix-franchise-was-inspired-by-rage-oppression-before-transition-1296914&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Unlike the previous entries, the latest entry, ''The Matrix Resurrections'', doesn't bother to hide the fact that it is pro-[[transgenderism]] and shows a level of outward contempt for [[family values]] that is unprecedented in Hollywood - as the character of Trinity only finds her life to be fulfilling when she abandons her husband and children to lead a Marxist revolution against conservatives.  The villain of this entry is based on Conservative commentator [[Ben Shapiro]] and wrongly portrays his common sense views on trans people as Nazism.&lt;br /&gt;
| $592,370,339 (all together) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Midnight in Paris''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The main character, a liberal author, is open-minded and intellectual. He has an unsuccessful relationship with a woman whose family is Republican and are depicted as being &amp;quot;materialistic&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;selfish&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;narrow-minded&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot; towards any country that is not the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,816,662 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Milk'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008 &lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sean Penn portrays openly homosexual politician [[Harvey Milk]] in this biography.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,841,299&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Motorcycle Diaries'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Walter Salles directs this fawning monument to [[Communist]] terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,781,387&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mulan''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The live action remake of the animated film of the same name. It ends up doubling down on the feminist rhetoric from the original, implies [[big government]] is good, and is particularly infamous for being a blatant example of Disney's current management's hypocrisy where they refuse to do business over Georgia, yet not only worked with China to develop the film (including censorships), but also went as far as to specifically cooperate with various departments of the Xijiping province that held authority over concentration camps. The lead actress for the film even sang praises for the Communist Party during the latter's crackdowns on Democracy demonstrators in Hong Kong during filming.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|The more openly liberal sequel to the apolitical ''The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!'' pushes environmentalism and attacks productive businesses, especially the oil industry.&lt;br /&gt;
|$86,930,411&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Night of the Living Dead]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This independent horror abomination by George A. Romero vilifies [[nuclear energy]], as nuclear fallout from an exploding space probe in Earth's atmosphere is said to be the cause of the recently deceased becoming reanimated. In addition, it negatively portrays police officers as racist: a group of officers kills Ben, the African American protagonist, when they mistake him for one of the dead, which Romero intentionally chose to have happen to accuse the police of being behind racial lynchings. Had two [[sequel]]s , ''Dawn of the Dead'' (1978 Italian) and ''Day of the Dead'' (1985).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Nixon'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This historically inaccurate biography of [[Richard Nixon]] is directed by liberal filmmaker [[Oliver Stone]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,681,765&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Obvious Child'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie normalizes abortion after casual sex with humorous style. The movie didnt get success they expect &lt;br /&gt;
|$1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Okja''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|This environmentalist propaganda piece vilifies capitalists and essentially plagiarizes the Buster Keaton classic ''Go West''.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''On Deadly Ground''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The film demonizes the oil industry as greedy and unsympathetic while praising the [[EPA]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,590,458&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pan's Labyrinth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Aside from it promoting paganism and the occult, it also demonized [[Francisco Franco]]'s Spain and promoted the Spanish Republicans from the Spanish Civil War due to it being made by Marxist director [[Guillermo del Toro]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2007/01/19/pans-labyrinth-allegory-of-spanish-civil-war/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$83.3 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Platoon''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Vietnam War and anti-American war film which depicts most of the American soldiers as psychopathic war criminals, while the &amp;quot;good&amp;quot; soldiers smoke marijuana, and also depicts the NVA as sympathetic. Was also made by the far-left filmmaker Oliver Stone, who in an especially shameful element of irony and hypocrisy was himself a Vietnam veteran.&lt;br /&gt;
|$6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Post''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An obvious promotion of the leaking of the ''[[Pentagon Papers]]''. It treats the liberal journalists who committed the leaking in a positive light, while depicting Nixon in a negative light (despite Nixon never being responsible for the Pentagon Papers in the first place, and it being done under the auspices of Democrats JFK and LBJ).&lt;br /&gt;
|$179.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Professor Marston and the Wonder Women''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Its talks about William Moulton Marston and Elizabeth Holloway Marston life who create [[Wonder Woman]] character. The movie promote immoral polyamorous relationships. The movie ended horribly at box office &lt;br /&gt;
|$1.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''The Purge (series)&lt;br /&gt;
|2013, 2014, 2016, 2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Movie featuring gratuitous graphic violence, and normalization of violent degenerate behavior. It is based on a political movement called the &amp;quot;New Founding Fathers of America&amp;quot; (NFFA), which is portrayed as a reformation of the Republican party (this can be based on how a majority of the people that played roles for characters of the &amp;quot;NFFA&amp;quot; were white and old, which is how Liberals see Republicans). The protagonists are what would generally be considered by the Democrats to be people who would vote for them (black, Hispanic, Asian, women, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
|$446.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Recount''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|The 2008 [[HBO]] movie on the [[United States presidential election, 2000|2000 Presidential election]] and its aftermath in [[Florida]], presented from a [[Liberal bias|liberal-biased]] viewpoint. A look into how [[Democrats]] and their [[Mainstream media|liberal media]] supporters claim the [[Republicans]] &amp;quot;stole&amp;quot; the [[election]] and the alleged role of its party members that the Democrats claim &amp;quot;made it happen&amp;quot; (although in reality, it was the Democrats themselves who tried to steal the election for their candidate [[Al Gore]] [[United States presidential election, 2000#Recount|by attempting to commit vote fraud in Florida through ordering selective recounts in Democrat-friendly areas while ignoring Republican-strong areas]], only to be stopped when the US Supreme Court ruled the Democrats' end-run attempt around election rules to be illegal). Republicans are portrayed as ghoulish and cited as manufacturing demonstrations. Both the real [[Warren Christopher]] and [[James Baker]] contend the film's portrayal of the former is hopelessly untrue.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Redacted''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Brian De Palma’s 2007 fictional anti-Iraq War film funded by Mark Cuban. The film is credited with inspiring a [[terrorist]] attack that killed two U.S. servicemen in [[Germany]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$65,388&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Red Joan''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the life of Communist traitor Melita Norwood, who gave up schematics on the British nuclear weapons program to the KGB. The film may be vaguely anti-Stalinist, but is pro-Communist, anti-Cold War, and anti-Western. Near the end of the movie, when the woman's son accuses her of betraying her country, she insists that somehow, she is the real patriot. It's also pro-feminist, as male characters are portrayed as supposedly belittling her, encouraging her to serve tea and do laundry, and rather than leaving these insignificances out of the story, the movie portrays it as integral to the plot when she supposedly tricked the British police into thinking she was stupid and asking them if they wanted tea, though that part of the story is in all likelihood inaccurate and never even happened. Also, the decision by United States President Harry Truman to drop two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to end the Second World War is strongly condemned, and to an extent, is demonized. At the end of the movie, she arrogantly says ''twice'', &amp;quot;I was right.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;Right&amp;quot; to give Joseph Stalin, the evilest man in history, instructions to build nuclear weapons? She refers to the fact that sharing the nuclear weapons secrets prevented the Cold War from turning hot, and while the situation of M.A.D. (Mutually Assured Destruction) prevented such an occurrence, there never even would have been a Cold War if Stalin had never acquired nuclear weapons, or otherwise the U.S. would have won a lot sooner. The movie also implied that the tactics of the British police and MI5 were similar to the KGB. Imagine a film had been released portraying Jakiw Palij, the last ex-Nazi in the United States, who was deported by President Donald Trump to Germany, in such a sympathetic fashion. Just more communist propaganda from Hollywood.&lt;br /&gt;
|$9,800,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Reds''&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|As a biographical film on the life of notorious American [[Communist]] journalist John Reed, ''Reds'' is a sentimental and overly romanticized portrait of [[Communism]], [[humanism]], and [[anarchism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,382,659&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Red State''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Some of the most disgusting hate-filled liberal propaganda ever filmed, at least in the Obama era when America supposedly became a &amp;quot;center-left&amp;quot; nation. Starring John Goodman and a cast of nobodies.  The film is premised on the idea that Red States are populated by the likes of anti-gay followers of an allegorical preacher in the vein of [[Fred Phelps]] of the [[Westboro Baptist Church]] who performs ritual murder on gays ''ala'' [[Matthew Shepard]].  John Goodman of the [[ATF]] leads the federal government cavalry to the rescue evoking the glorious image of the Clinton era [[Waco massacre]]. Critics called it one of the director's &amp;quot;Twitter rants fleshed out into film with equal portions of bile sprayed at both church and state&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;Messy, overwritten, ...kind of a bore....it's not a horror movie by any usual definition. More like teen horror movie morphs into Waco disaster&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;fails onscreen and off at its world premiere ... A shoddy film and a bait-and-switch event fail to satisfy on any level&amp;quot;; &amp;quot;it's clear that the smart alec writer still has some things to learn about making a great film.&amp;quot;  Red State won the Best Motion Picture award at the 2011 Sitges Film Festival, while Michael Parks was named Best Actor.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.1 million domestically&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; (- $2.2 million loss over its $4 million budget)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Return of the Living Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|In another stand-alone sequel to ''Night of the Living Dead'', the military is supposedly responsible for the release of a toxin that turns people into zombies. The military is also shown to be inconstant, as they &amp;quot;fix&amp;quot; this by nuking the city of zombies. An anti-[[Ronald Reagan|Reagan]] statement some may say (the Left feared that Reagan would create nuclear holocaust, which is present in this film). &lt;br /&gt;
|$14,237,880 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Robocop''&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Left-wing smut-peddler Paul Verhoeven's failed attempt to depict all police forces and corporations as evil.  It also contains an [[environmentalism|environmentalist]] message with the &amp;quot;6000 SUX,&amp;quot; a car that pollutes and guzzles gas for no other reason than to be environmentally unfriendly. Verhoeven is also a member of the Liberal [[Jesus Seminar]], which also inspired him to make the movie a grotesque parody of Christ's resurrection. &lt;br /&gt;
| 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rosemary's Baby&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film that attempts to downplay Satanism and Witchcraft. It is also a piece of feminist propaganda, since a mother tries taking her pregnancy into her own hands, instead of allowing her husband to choose for her. This feminist message is fixed when the doctor recognizes the woman's absurdity and calls her husband.&lt;br /&gt;
|$33,396,740&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sacco e Vanzetti''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the title, the film acts as a biopic of the anarchist murderers [[Sacco and Vanzetti]], with them being portrayed in a sympathetic light. In addition, the [[Essay:Worst Liberal Song|Worst Liberal Song]] &amp;quot;Here's to You&amp;quot;, also dealing with the two anarchists in a similar light, was released with this movie as part of its soundtrack.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Selene''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Claims the [[Hispanic]] pop star Selene was &amp;quot;Mexican-American&amp;quot; and bitterly attempts to blame [[Ronald Reagan]] for the severe economic dislocation and [[stagflation]] created by Democrats and socialists in the late 1970s and early 1980s.  In fact, Selene was known as the &amp;quot;Queen of Tejano music,&amp;quot; ''Tejano'' being the Spanish word for Texas and Tejano music likened to an American version of Spanish County Western music.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$32.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shoot 'Em Up''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An anti-second amendment film, the so-called &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot; is a [[nihilist]] and the &amp;quot;villains&amp;quot; are trying to defend gun rights and the Second Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
|$12,807,139&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Short Circuit''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|On top of just being an blatant ''E.T.'' rip-off, ''Short Circuit'' also downgrades the military (or the Reagan Administration in general).&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,697,761&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''[[SiCKO]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another Michael Moore film which spread many falsehoods about American [[healthcare]] while unduly glorifying the so-called benefits of [[socialized medicine]] such as now found in [[Obamacare]]. Memorably referred to [[Cuba]]n healthcare as being &amp;quot;better&amp;quot; than American healthcare. &lt;br /&gt;
|$24,540,079&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Siege''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't be fooled by the fact that Bruce Willis is in it. Willis plays the antagonist, an Army general who institutes martial law in New York City after a wave of terrorist attacks. Portrays Muslims as the &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; while demonizing the military.&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,932,372&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek: Into Darkness''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Aside from it being a blatant ripoff on ''Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan'' in terms of plotline, the film also has several anti-War on Terror messages, as indicated by both Benedict Cumberbatch and Simon Pegg.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/2/22/4-ways-star-trek-into-darkness-shills-for-surrender-in-the-war-on-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$467.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Süss the Jew''&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Semitic Nazi propaganda film, that was notorious for it successfully pushing the anti-Semitic agenda throughout Nazi Germany via a subtle method.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Syriana''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Is anti-War on Terror, with the film heavily implying that Saudi Arabia was in the middle of liberal reforms that America interfered with due to oil businessmen (despite the exact opposite being true).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/4/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$94 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''They Live''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Capitalists are portrayed as evil aliens planning to rule the world. The director John Carpenter also claimed in interviews that the film was anti-[[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/john-carpenter-they-live-was-about-giving-the-finger-to-reagan/#/0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,008,928 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Thomas Crown Affair''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Supports the claim that capitalism causes crime.&lt;br /&gt;
| $14 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tomorrowland''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the fact that the film had basis on the theme park proposed by [[Walt Disney]] fool you. The film was anti-capitalist and pro-liberal/progressive values propaganda with it pushing the exact opposite messages that Disney himself wanted to impart. Bill Whittle, when reviewing the film, even mentioned that had he still been alive and saw the film, Disney would most likely have torn up his proposal for [[Disneyland]] and proceeded to drink himself to death in despair of what the film claimed his idea was.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmxeoh69G4o&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$209.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tout va Bien'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1972 &lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Jane Fonda]] &amp;quot;art film&amp;quot; directed by [[Jean-Luc Godard]], who was notoriously anti-American and idolized [[Karl Marx]], is nothing more than a propaganda film for Communism, as it sympathizes with the youths who partook in the [[May 1968 riots|May 1968 Communist uprisings]] in [[France]] and features blunt anti-American imagery.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Triumph of the Will''&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|The world's most infamous Nazi propaganda film (even though the Left denies it, the Nazis were in truth left wing National Socialists).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Trumbo''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Dalton Trumbo, one of the Hollywood Ten who was jailed for his Communist beliefs, is portrayed as a free-speech martyr, and a &amp;quot;champion&amp;quot; of the First Amendment. All of his controversial beliefs are whitewashed, including his support of Lenin, Hitler (until the Nazi-Soviet Pact fell), Kim Il-Sung, and, of course, Stalin. Conversely, anti-Communists such as John Wayne, Hedda Hopper, Robert Taylor, Roy Brewer, the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), and the Motion Picture Alliance for the Preservation of American Ideals (MPA) are falsely portrayed as &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;oppressive&amp;quot;, and anti-free-speech.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,857,741	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Truth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Highly fictionalized political docudrama about the Killian documents controversy meant to further tarnish the reputation of [[George W. Bush]]. The film was not approved by then-current CBS President and CEO Leslie Moonves and CBS refused to air advertisements for the film due to its, as the network stated, &amp;quot;inaccuracies and distortions&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,541,854&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''V for Vendetta'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly glorifies [[anarchism]], [[homosexuality]] and [[Islam]]. It also depicts conservatives as evil and fascists (again).&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,511,035&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Vice'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Made by Socialist filmmaker Adam McKay, this movie exists solely to ridicule American patriot [[Dick Cheney]] and lies about his legacy, portraying him as an unlikable sociopath without morals.&lt;br /&gt;
|$75,500,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[W.]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie designed to denigrate the role of [[Christianity]] in U.S. [[politics]] and particularly in the life of [[George W. Bush]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,534,493&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''White House Down''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Mocks conservatives with a liberal plot twist that makes the [[TEA Party]] out to be &amp;quot;terrorists&amp;quot;. This movie was made by uber-liberals to counter the great conservative film; ''Olympus Has Fallen'', which depicts North Korean terrorists as the bad guys.&lt;br /&gt;
|$73,103,784&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Winchester''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based loosely on the Winchester Mystery House in San Jose, California. The film focuses more on its anti-gun message than the actual paranormal events.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/winchester-confronts-the-american-curse-of-firearms&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Z'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal propaganda that blames the [[military]] for liberal wrongdoing.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,283,305&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Socially Liberal Live-Action Films==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This Romanian film baselessly supports [[abortion]]. Liberals praised it when it won the Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,198,208&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''365 Days'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|A sexually explicit European movie that tried to be like a copy of ''Fifty shades of Gray''. This movie failed miserably, receiving 0% rating from notoriously liberal, biased [[Rotten Tomatoes]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$9.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Abyss'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal atheist [[James Cameron]] pushes the agenda that global warming is real and that the military is pure evil.&lt;br /&gt;
|$90,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Adoration'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-18&lt;br /&gt;
|The film tried to normalize the idea of ​​young boys having affairs with their friends' mothers. The movie failed miserably even with its many famous cast members. The movie's budget was $16 million, but it only grossed around $2.5 million at the box office. Even the liberal-leaning [[Rotten Tomatoes]] had a 33% rating.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[American Beauty]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Directed by homosexual Sam Mandes, this slice-of-life drama follows Lester Burnham, a depressed, middle-aged, unhappily married advertising executive who enters his midlife crisis and starts living like the rebellious teenager he was in the early 1970s when he becomes [[pedophilia|pedophilically]] interested in his 16-year-old daughter Jane's friend and high school classmate Angela Hayes, who often brags to her peers about being sexually experienced with older men. Only when he learns she is a virgin does he finally relent. Meanwhile, Lester's wife, Carolyn, has an affair with another married man. Likewise, Jane starts dating new neighbor boy Ricky Fitts, a would-be experimental filmmaker who pays for supplies by dealing [[marijuana]]. Ricky has a troubled relationship with his father, Colonel Frank, a negative representation of the military who is outwardly abusive towards his son and intolerant of homosexuals, but is also secretly &amp;quot;closeted&amp;quot; himself and goes so far as to murder Lester, to whom he is attracted, to keep it a secret.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''American Pie''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The first installment of a long-running film franchise primarily dealing with teenage sex and alcohol relies on jokes about sex and bodily functions, even treating date rape as &amp;quot;funny&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$102,561,004&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ammonite''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-18&lt;br /&gt;
|Is a history revisionist and immoral movie that was produced by the woke [[BBC]] and starred by woke actresses Kate Winslet and Saoirse Ronan. The movie portrayed the English paleontologist and fossil collector Marie Anning (1799-1847) and English geologist Charlotte Murchison (1788-1869) as women who had a lesbian affair with many sexually explicit scenes, which has no historical evidence to prove that. Despite the objections of the Anning family, producers continued with their distortion. Although the movie was nominated for many awards by woke liberal critics, it was a huge disaster for producers, gaining only gaining $1.4 million with a budget of $13.4 million.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''And Then We Danced''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This Swedish-[[Republic of Georgia|Georgian]] co-production pushes the homosexual agenda as it presents the story of a dancer who leaves his girlfriend and longtime dance partner to begin a homosexual affair with another male dancer.  Controversy erupted, and protests occurred when the movie was shown in its native Georgia due to the film's homosexual theme.  On account of that theme, it did very poorly at the box office.&lt;br /&gt;
|$281,159&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Animal House''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978, full title ''National Lampoon's Animal House''&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This college &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; glorifies [[alcohol abuse]], debauchery, [[nihilism]], cheating, extramarital sex, and all varieties of youthful rebellion. The dean, played by John Vernon, suggests that being &amp;quot;Fat, drunk, and stupid, son, is no way to go through life&amp;quot; to one of the rebellious youth representing the rowdy Delta Tau Chi fraternity, but he's depicted as the villain because of that. After the Delta boys are finally punished by being collectively expelled from college, they exact their revenge by sabotaging a homecoming parade, and do not face punishment for such a great misdeed. Even so, the film's &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot;, portrayed by one of Hollywood's most amoral actors ever, John Belushi, goes on to become a U.S. Senator, which is passed off as humorous.&lt;br /&gt;
|$141,600,000 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Anora''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| A sexually explicit porn movie filled with anti-Russian propaganda. The film failed miserably at the box office and didn't gain over 40$ million, but despite that, it was awarded the Academy Award for Best Picture.&lt;br /&gt;
|$6 million	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Atomic Blonde''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This Cold War film's major themes are feminism, the LGBT agenda, and racism against those with dark hair and eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,573,925&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Avatar (film)|Avatar]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The highest-grossing feature in history, directed by liberal James Cameron, enforces many destructive messages, including [[environmentalism]], [[feminism]], and the absurd claim that nature is [[God]]. It also ridicules the military and large businesses. The overall plotline hints at endorsing environmental terrorism, which Cameron indicated that he himself supported.&lt;br /&gt;
|$760,507,625&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Avatar (film)|Avatar: The Way of Water]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal atheist James Cameron's sequel to his highly overrated movie.  This is yet another nonsensical screed against [[capitalism]] that pushes [[political correctness]], [[woke|wokeism]], [[environmentalism]], and [[feminism]]. Once again, he celebrates eco-terrorism and treats [[paganism]] as truth. He also portrays the US government as savage terrorists who remorselessly torture children. Cameron also publicly promoted this sequel by sharing overtly disgusting and disrespectful views on pregnant women and describing [[testosterone]] as a &amp;quot;poison&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;toxin&amp;quot; that needs to be eradicated.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Babygirl''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-family and anti-motherhood film about mothers ditching their responsibilities to go wild. The movie was released in Christmas and led by liberal actress Nicole Kidman, the movie normalizes cheating wives, porn addiction, and [[BDSM]]. The movie got a huge push from liberal critics in [[Rotten Tomatoes]] with 76%, but got humiliated by audience rating with 48%.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Moms''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-family and anti-motherhood film about mothers ditching their responsibilities to go wild.&lt;br /&gt;
|$113,257,297&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Santa''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This insult to the sacred holiday of Christmas features gratuitous coarse language, sexual escapades, drunkenness, and the main plot involving a con man posing as a Mall Santa so he and his dwarf accomplice can rob the mall's safe. It was bad enough that critics panned Disney for allowing the trashing of a cultural icon like Santa Claus, as well as even then-Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, being disgusted with the resulting film, acting as one of the main reasons for Miramax being cut loose from Disney alongside ''Kill Bill''.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Santa 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This sequel follows the already-revolting ''Bad Santa''. Miramax, which distributed this movie as well as its predecessor, was acquired in 2016 by beIN Media Group, which is owned by Islamic propaganda channel [[Al Jazeera]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$23.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Teacher''&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Cameron Diaz stars as an awful high school teacher, who is always getting high and drunk, tries to get breast-implant surgery, and encourages cheating and stealing from her students. The movie contains no [[morals]] and is filled with offensive sexual content.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Barbie''&lt;br /&gt;
| 2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the iconic titular fashion doll and directed by liberal misa-feminist Greta Gerwig,  ''Barbie'' is a [[feminist]], [[misandrist]] and pro-transgender and gender division agenda film depicting the fantasy realm of Barbieland as a matriarchal utopia where all the different variations of Barbie hold important jobs (including Doctor Barbie, portrayed by a bilogical man) and their male Ken counterparts are unemployed outcasts alongside discontinued toylines. The marketing, knowing perfectly people would not come to see the movie, released every trailer showing just few vague and neutral seconds of the film to trick the public into believing it was just a genuine, apolitical and neutral Barbie-style comedy movie, with Mattel executives panicking to the point of stating via interview that the ''Barbie'' is absolutely not a feminist agenda-driven movie in an attempt to avoid another potential boycott, despite the words of the cast and Greta Gerwig stating the contrary (with also creepy and disturbing statements about &amp;quot;educating the public&amp;quot; on &amp;quot;problematic gender roles/norms&amp;quot; as a &amp;quot;social construct&amp;quot;) and other red flags months before the release in the theaters. One obvious message is that the matriarchal Barbieland, where the Kens are treated as insignificant, weak, superfluous, and unimportant &amp;quot;accessories&amp;quot;, is the perfect and ideal world compared to the &amp;quot;patriarchal society&amp;quot; in the &amp;quot;real world&amp;quot;, despite the fact that the modern Western world described by the film and Greta Gerwig is far from being such a patriarchal and dystopian society. Gerwig self-inserts herself briefly like liberal, feminist, and leftist directors typically do as further proof of their disturbing and creepy narcissism, egocentrism, and self-absorption.&lt;br /&gt;
| $337 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beginners''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes homosexuality and &amp;quot;[[coming out of the closet]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,790,894&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Behaving badly''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This movie promotes promiscuity, alcoholism and drug addiction, and it portrays pastors and nuns negatively. The revenue for the movie was a huge failure. The movie got 0% rating on the notoriously liberal, biased website [[Rotten Tomatoes]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$422,697&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Being John Malkovich''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This biopic celebrates homosexuality and includes a large amount of vulgar humor.&lt;br /&gt;
|$637,721 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ben &amp;amp; Arthur''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|As the title suggests, this is a pro-homosexual propaganda movie that also portrays Christians as &amp;quot;hateful bigots&amp;quot;. The film has the reputation of being one of the most hated homosexual movies by critics and audiences alike, even among homosexuals. Wikipedia also acknowledges this, as this movie is on the page &amp;quot;List of movies considered the worst&amp;quot;. It was a major box-office bomb.&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Big Lebowski]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies [[drug abuse]], laziness, and [[nihilism]]. The Dude (played by Jeff Bridges) is an anti-war stoner. It became a cult classic among Liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|$17,451,873&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Billy Elliot]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This British film stars a boy who represents the homosexual agenda by wanting to be a ballet dancer rather than play sports. There are very poor family values as the family is constantly cursing at one another.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21,995,263&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bio-Dome'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|It's a stoner film with an environmentalist theme.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,427,615&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Birdcage''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Yet another pro-[[homosexual agenda]] and conservative bashing film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$124,060,553&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blow''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the life of drug dealer and suspected murderer George Jung.&lt;br /&gt;
|$52,990,775&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blue is the Warmest Color'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|This French film supports the [[homosexual agenda]] by graphically showing lesbian sex and falsely idealizing the concept that homosexuals can be sound mentors to young children. At the Cannes Film Festival, which was headed by liberal [[Steven Spielberg]] and had a board that included ''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' director Ang Lee, it was unanimously awarded the top prize.  It is widely believed that this victory was due to France's legalization of [[same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]] eight days prior. At least one of the film's stars admitted she felt disgusted by her role.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,199,787&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boat Trip''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This film, about two men who accidentally board a gay cruise, shamelessly promotes the homosexual agenda and presents the attempted sexual assault of a man by a woman as &amp;quot;humorous&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,020,293&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=boattrip.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boogie Nights'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A young man journeys through the pornography industry in the 1970s and 1980s and glorifies the exploitation of women.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26,400,640&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boyhood''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Centered on a family raised by a single mother, this slice-of-life drama, which took exactly 12 years to produce to capture realistic age progression for the cast, downplays the importance of a father in a child's growth and development, mocks conservative Christians, and promotes underage drinking and pot smoking. The lead actor, Ellar Coltrane, later &amp;quot;came out&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;non-binary&amp;quot; and has accomplished nothing noteworthy since.&lt;br /&gt;
|$44,400,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boys Don't Cry''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It glorifies the choice of a young girl to embrace homosexual and transgender life choices, dishonesty, and premarital relations. Furthermore, it caricatures and exaggerates natural reactions to her perversion, all in aid of promoting the [[homosexual agenda]]. On that note, JoAnn Brandon, the real life mother of Teena Brandon (the aforementioned woman who entered those lifestyles), condemned the movie and especially the star Hilary Swank's acceptance speech (in particular, the former failing to specifically state the reason why Teena cross-dressed was due to mental and emotional trauma from her earlier being molested by a man while she was very young, and the latter for claiming that &amp;quot;Teena&amp;quot; was in fact male when thanking Teena).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/film/2000/mar/29/oscars2000.oscars&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,533,945&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Breakfast Club]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|What masquerades as a drama comparing the similar personalities of five seemingly very different teenagers in school detention really promotes the use of drugs, smoking, and extramarital sex. Although it does contain the conservative quote &amp;quot;You ought to spend a little more time trying to make something of yourself and a little less time trying to impress people&amp;quot;, it is said by the main villain of the movie, the high school principal.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,525,171&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Bridges of Madison County''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie starring liberal and atheist actress [[Meryl Streep]] about a disloyal wife who instead wants to have a Christian burial beside her husband, she decided that she wants to be [[Cremation|cremated]] in honor of her lover that she cheated on her husband with.&lt;br /&gt;
|$22 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R (Should be NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|This nauseating &amp;quot;romance&amp;quot; film proves that [[liberals]] will [[shoehorning|shoehorn]] the homosexual agenda into anything, even Westerns. It was also an early example of production companies dictating to distributors what they should distribute at the local level, often against the distributor's own decisions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$83,043,761&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bros''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|R &lt;br /&gt;
|An alleged &amp;quot;romantic comedy&amp;quot; which is actually another attempt to blatantly put the homosexual agenda on display, featuring an entirely LGBTQ cast.  When the movie flopped at the box office (making back only $4.9 million on its opening weekend despite a $22 million budget for the film) because of its content despite being heavily promoted by celebrities, homosexual advocates and liberal media outlets, Billy Eichner, who starred in the movie, also co-wrote the script and is himself openly homosexual and a Democrat supporter, lashed out at the public for refusing to see the movie, accusing them of &amp;quot;homophobia&amp;quot; while engaging in [[heterophobia]] himself, which only resulted in a massive social media backlash against Eichner in response.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,900,000&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Brothers Grimsby''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This vulgar film is loaded with sex jokes, sex scenes, nudity, one graphic elephant sex scene, and a joke about Donald Trump getting AIDS. Luckily, it was a box office bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2016/03/14/box-office-brothers-grimsby-flopped-because-it-didnt-look-good/#4a36b6f749d7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$6,874,837&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''But I'm a Cheerleader'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A lesbian [[public school]] [[cheerleading|cheerleader]] is attracted to other cheerleaders, portraying [[homosexuality]] as a legitimate lifestyle. The film attacks and ridicules [[reparative therapy]] and religious people, and it normalizes lesbians by depicting the star as a girly cheerleader, obviously a forced subversion of the lesbian archetype.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,205,627&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Caligula''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|UR (should be NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|This historical drama about the infamous Roman emperor of the same name has been considered the most pornographic movie ever made, which led to it being a critical failure. It has unsimulated scenes of oral and anal sex, incest, and close-ups of the genitalia of both sexes, along with brutal violence. Upon its release, several U.S. cities tried to prevent the movie from being shown, though liberal courts repeatedly affirmed that it met the Miller test (finding it not obscene enough to be banned). Some lawyers defending it even lamented that it helped to form a conservative morality, which may have helped Ronald Reagan win the 1980 presidential election.&lt;br /&gt;
|$23 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Call Me By Your Name''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The ''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' of 2017, only this time pedophilia, in addition to homosexuality, is endorsed and displayed as &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;intellectual&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Captain Marvel''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the eponymous Marvel Comics superheroine (although the original incarnation of the Marvel character in the comics was a male alien superhero, not to be confused with the older Captain Marvel aka Shazam from DC Comics) and set in 1995, the twenty-first installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe follows Carol Danvers as she becomes Captain Marvel after Earth is caught in the center of a galactic conflict between two alien civilizations. In contrast to the rest of the film series up to this point, ''Captain Marvel'' is explicitly feminist, one example showing a deleted scene with Captain Marvel threatening a man for mild flirts, including &amp;quot;Smile for me&amp;quot; and stealing his belongings. During an interview, Captain Marvel's actress Brie Larson shows some sexism, [[ageism]], and self-loathing [[racism]] by saying that she &amp;quot;won't accept reviews about the movie from 40-year-old white men&amp;quot; (even though she is herself white). The film was also notorious for Disney and Marvel going to extremes to ensure it had any chance at a box office success, including forcing theaters to make it the single showing for a week, buying tickets and lying on the importance of the film to understand ''[[Avengers: Endgame]]'' released the same year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/some-reports-indicate-captain-marvel-is-the-only-movie-playing-at-some-theaters-during-premiere-week/78446/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/KBeUffaNxkY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://cosmicbook.news/disney-manipulated-captain-marvel-perception&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://boundingintocomics.com/2019/03/13/new-reports-of-empty-theaters-at-captain-marvel-add-to-movies-controversy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as well as having Rotten Tomatoes remove its negative reviews of the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/03/rotten-tomatoes-removes-thousands-of-negative-captain-marvel-user-ratings/79348/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/02/captain-marvel-rotten-tomatoes-censorship-circumvented-thanks-to-dissenter-extension/78084/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.128 billion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Cat in the Hat''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|This bastardization of an instantly recognizable children's classic, filled with adult humor and pandered to focus groups, is the reason why Dr. Seuss's widow has banned any live-action adaptations of Seuss's works. It won a one-time Golden Raspberry (or &amp;quot;Razzie&amp;quot;) Award for &amp;quot;Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie (All Concept/No Content)&amp;quot; and was nominated for eight other Razzies. It is from the same screenwriters of ''EuroTrip'', a 2004 raunchy and blasphemous comedy film also made by DreamWorks.&lt;br /&gt;
|$$55 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Challengers''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-18&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie promotes promiscuous and perverse homosexual affairs between married couples.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,569,268 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chappie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another &amp;quot;social&amp;quot; science fiction film that just abuses our [[First Amendment|first amendment right]] to bash capitalism. Neill Blomkamp also directed liberal films District 9 and Elysium too. On an optimistic note, the film got bad reviews (even from liberal critics)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/chappie/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the film did poorly in America (70% of its gross came from overseas).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=chappie.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,569,268 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cheaper by the Dozen 3&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|This third installment of the franchise clearly shows 20th Century Fox's ownership by Disney, as it departs from the family friendliness of the original and the 1st sequel in that it has several sex scenes, plus it pushes race-baiting.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chuck &amp;amp; Buck''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Debauched independent film about a man who revisits another man he traumatized through sexual grooming as a child. The message is that in some instances, groomers are the real victims and greatly misunderstood because of their need for casual sex. Also, if their victims weren't &amp;quot;brainwashed&amp;quot; by moralistic views about sex, most of them would consent to it and see it as a good thing, and no trauma would ever happen. In the film, when he meets the man he seduced in their youth, he encourages him to cheat on his wife, who is &amp;quot;holding him back&amp;quot;, and have sex with him in order to desensitize him to hedonism and see monogamy as a perversion. The director and writer of the film is openly bisexual, and plays the role of the groomer who initiates the encounter. He admits it is based on his experiences and fantasies.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Cider House Rules''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies [[abortion]] and advocates &amp;quot;[[pro-choice]]&amp;quot; values to a fault.&lt;br /&gt;
|$57,545,092&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''[[City of Ember]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Currently the once-in-a-lifetime adaptation.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Clerks]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with constant vulgar [[profanity]]. Previously rated NC-17, then appealed for an R rating.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,151,130&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Clerks 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sequel to the liberal comedy, filled with more profanity and even more disgusting acts that would not have been in the budget of the original film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,148,068&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Cosmic Slop]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|HBO trilogy focusing on minority science fiction. The main claim to fame was an adaptation of ''[[The Space Traders]]'', a race-baiting short story written by the infamous leftist race-baiter Derrick Bell.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cradle 2 the Grave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|MPAA&lt;br /&gt;
|At first your typical buddy cop movie with lots of explosions, shootings and hand-to-hand combats with a global threat and conspiracy and the kidnapping of the child of one of the protagonists as central parts to the plot. However, there's a creepy and disturbing particular element that says it is &amp;quot;aged badly&amp;quot; since its very release would be a gigantic euphemism. To start a conversation, Agent Su asks Anthony if his 8, almost 9-year-old, daughter already has a &amp;quot;little boyfriend&amp;quot;, and Anthony replies with a straight &amp;quot;never&amp;quot; and that he would &amp;quot;kill them&amp;quot;, therefore admitting with creepy and disturbing nonchalance in the presence of a cop that he would commit literal child murder. This is also a creepy potential sign of a future abusive father, and it's quite likely how liberals viewed and view conservative or traditional fathers.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34,657,731&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cuck''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|As implied by the title, it mocks conservative values and paints conservatives and alt-right people as lunatics. Is also notorious for being released to a box office of $0.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2020/04/cuck-movie-gets-woke-goes-broke-at-box-office/106756/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cuties''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This depraved French movie shamelessly sexualizes pre-pubescent girls and has them dancing and twerking in sexually suggestive ways that no respectable '''adult woman''' would be seen doing. When asked if they supported [[pedophilia]], producers at Netflix responded that they respected all religions, as if they really believed that pedophilia is actually a religion.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dallas Buyers Club''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Egregiously supports the homosexual agenda during its deadly-years [[AIDS]] epidemic.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,298,285&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Danish Girl''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|One of the definitive pro-homosexual/gender confusion propaganda films. Eddie Redmayne portrays Einar Wegener, a landscape artist who stands in for a female model who no-shows for a painting planned by Wegener's wife, Gerda. Einar, who has undergone gender confusion for years, snaps as a result of the modeling sessions where he stands in as &amp;quot;female&amp;quot; and he begins claiming to be a &amp;quot;woman&amp;quot; calling himself &amp;quot;Lili Elbe&amp;quot;, which nearly leads to him being committed to an asylum. Einar later undergoes surgical mutilation to accommodate his delusion, but he dies of infection due to the mutilation.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,114,018&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Day After''&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Attacks the military and conservative politicians, and encourages negotiation with Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Day After Tomorrow'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Overdramatic, nonsensical portrayal of the consequences of fictional &amp;quot;[[climate change]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$186,740,799&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Day of the Animals''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|PG &lt;br /&gt;
|Environmentalist propaganda that states &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; turns woodland animals into psychotic human-hunters. It also claims that humans must get what they deserve (which they do not).&lt;br /&gt;
|$2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Dazed and Confused''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This coming-of-age film circa 1976, attempts to normalize [[promiscuity]] and [[drug abuse]] among teenagers and young adults.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,993,039&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dirty Grandpa''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor family values, a soon-to be groom, takes his recently widowed grandfather on a road trip, he eventually leaves his finance, and ends up with a hippie instead. Drug usage is present, and clearly pro-LGBT, with a supporting character being gay.&lt;br /&gt;
|$35,593,113&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''District 9''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Alien invaders are shown sympathetically, but the military, corporations, and humans in general are not.&lt;br /&gt;
|$115,646,235&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Don’t Breathe''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie's protagonists are three burglars who break into homes (secured by one of their father’s security company) to steal items to sell. The &amp;quot;villain&amp;quot; of the movie is a blind army veteran, and the homeowner of the house they are breaking into. Although they do find that he has kidnapped the girl who killed his daughter in a car accident. Also, feminism is present with the leader of the thieves being a girl.&lt;br /&gt;
|$89,217,875&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Don't Worry Darling''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This movie was directed and produced by feminist and misandrist Olivia Wilde. The movie demonizes patriarchy and especially white men. The movie received a low approval rating from even from notoriously biased [[Rotten Tomatoes]] and didn't receive earnings as producers expected.&lt;br /&gt;
|35$ Million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Doom''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the video game that influenced the [[Columbine High School massacre|Columbine High School massacre]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20060223025846/columbine.free2host.net/quotes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, ll the military characters (except one) are corrupt. Fans of the game criticized it for not including much monster-themed action.&lt;br /&gt;
|$28,212,337&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Drag Me to Hell''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite being made by known Republican&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whatculture.com/offbeat/10-celebs-you-wouldnt-expect-to-be-republicans?page=4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sam Raimi, the film's premise dealt with a woman being condemned simply for doing what her job required her to do at the bank, with Raimi also implicitly stating that the gypsy who cursed her had sympathetic reasons for cursing the main protagonist despite the fact that she herself had explicitly foresaken paying mortgage three times. In addition, the means to counteract the Lamia (the creature responsible for sending people to Hell when cursed) were more explicitly Pagan than Christian.&lt;br /&gt;
|$90.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Easy Rider''&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This slice-of-life drama follows two drug-addicted motorcyclists who glorify every aspect of the hippie lifestyle. Conservatives are incorrectly portrayed and generalized as racist rednecks.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Elysium''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This propaganda piece criticizes big business and supports [[illegal immigration]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$93,050,117&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Emilia Perez''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|It's a musical film about a [[Mexican drug cartel]] member who becomes trans that includes a creepy musical number about sex change surgery. Despite failing miserably in box office, The movie was nominated for 13 awards by liberal Academy awards. The movie budget was $26 million and got only $15.4 million on box office, around 12$ million deficit.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fantastic Four'' (2015 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based very loosely on the comics of the same name and deprived of the source material's humor, the film portrays the military in a negative manner. Here, they only want to use superpowered teens as weapons. On top of that, they also changed the race of the Human Torch and his father for political correctness/cultural Marxism reasons. The film was also infamous for its controversial behind-the-scenes history. The studio executives mandated reshoots without the director's knowledge of this and the final cut was gutted in the editing room. Director Josh Trank was so angered by this that he completely disowned the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/josh-trank-disowns-fantastic-four-via-twitter-claims-studio-interference-322&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 2005 film featuring [[Jessica Alba]], which is more conservative is looked in a retroactively positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,117,548 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fast Food Nation''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite Bruce Willis is in it, and the title the film attacks [[capitalism]] and [[Fast food|fast food]] in general while pushing [[environmentalism]], veganism, [[illegal immigration]], and extramarital sex.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,005,539&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Fast Times at Ridgemont High''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film glorifies [[drug abuse]], premarital sex, and [[abortion]]. It was also one of [[Sean Penn]]'s early film roles as he would go on to star in more liberal propaganda films. The abortion scene is heavily edited out-of-context by sugarcoating the reality that it's gory and actually putting the mother's life at risk. In the follow-up scene, Stacy Hamilton's more conservative-minded brother Brad fortunately confronts her about it.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,092,880   &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Female Trouble''&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|This atrocious movie is made from the same director of ''Pink Flamingos'', starring an overweight delinquent student named Dawn Davenport (played by transvestite Divine) who abandons her family and starts a life of crime. Crime is glorified and embraced, for Dawn decides to start causing crime as a way to get famous, and she even shows no remorse for her actions while she is electrocuted at the end of the movie, thanking her fans for helping her gain infamy. Abuse is also glorified, from Dawn's contempt for her parents to refusing to let her daughter Taffy be a normal girl, beating her harshly and even threatening to kill her for joining Hare Krishna (and eventually does). When Taffy later meets her father who abandoned the family, he sexually harasses her, pushing an incest vibe as well. The movie also pushes the homosexual agenda, where one woman urges a man to become gay because she thinks of heterosexuality as boring, and it shows two close-up shots of male genitalia as well. Like with ''Pink Flamingos'', this movie got a positive reception from a rather morality-deprived audience.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fifty Shades of Grey''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Sexual explicit and porn movie that normalize [[BDSM]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$40 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''A Fish Called Wanda'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The protagonists are criminals, thieves, and liars. One character even tires to kill an elderly lady, as her being the only witness to the robbery. Also promotes infidelity, with the lawyer having an affair with one of the criminals and leaving his wife and daughter.&lt;br /&gt;
|$62,493,712&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Forest''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the Aokigahara Forest in [[Japan]] as a scary place filled with vengeful ghosts. In reality, it is a sad place where people go to commit suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Fourth Kind''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Uses the real-life tragedies of deceased and missing citizens of Nome, Alaska to make money with a fictitious story about alien abductions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47,709,193&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Freddy Got Fingered''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains a lot of crude and revolting gross-out sexual humor, including a scene where the main character actually makes a horse [censored]. Uses shock tactics in much the same way that ''[[Family Guy]]'' does. Won five Razzie awards, including Worst Picture and four awards (Worst Actor, Worst Director, Worst Screenplay and Worst Screen Couple) for star and director, Canadian &amp;quot;comedian&amp;quot; Tom Green.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Get Out''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This racist horror comedy-drama follows an African American man who discovers to his shock that his white American girlfriend's parents transplant the brains of white Americans into the bodies of African Americans as if to strip their victims of African American cultural identity. It presents a false dichotomy between black and white culture and discourages American ideals such as interracial and intercultural integration, all while accusing white Americans of wanting to eliminate instead of integrating all racial subcultures in the nation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ghostbusters'' (2016 reboot)&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This staunchly feminist remake of the conservative horror comedy classic replaces all the original male heroes with women who appear to have only vaguely different personalities, and every male character is either unintelligent or mean-spirited. Racism and sexual innuendoes are present as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7ikR-6uSMYz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also the remake also replaces the [[EPA]] with [[United States Department of Homeland Security|Homeland Security]] as the bad guys. Luckily, no one other than the world's most biased liberal critics liked it, as its trailer was known for being the most hated of its kind on YouTube.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://screencrush.com/ghostbusters-trailer-most-disliked-movie-trailer-in-history/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sony was caught making fake reviews&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXv3w59raZ4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the film flopped at the box office &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.imdb.com/news/ni60138331?fb_comment_id=1146766692061206_1146942958710246&amp;amp;comment_id=1146942958710246&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; so tremendously that Sony Pictures Entertainment lost over $70 million.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,049,002 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Gladiator 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|While the 2000 ''[[Gladiator]]'' film portrayed masculinity positively, this 2024 sequel treats it as a bad joke. Lucius - son of Maximus and Lucilla - is introduced in this movie being scolded by his wife for being slightly too aggressive while plowing the fields. Said wife is treated as a more superior soldier compared to her husband, and when she gets killed in battle, Lucius is blamed for letting her fight at all. General Acacius is also shown being ashamed of winning a battle in the Colosseum, which shows that the movie is mocking strength and victory as &amp;quot;problematic&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34 million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Glen or Glenda''&lt;br /&gt;
|1953&lt;br /&gt;
|Not rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Created by Ed Wood and widely regarded as one of the worst directors of all time, it celebrates cross-dressing and transsexualism.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Godzilla'' (1998 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal and homosexual director Roland Emmerich turns Godzilla into a girl and enforces the idea that military does more damage than Godzilla. The film even fails to address the original message of the original 1954 Japanese film (the first ''Godzilla'' was created in response to fears of the aftermath of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of World War II), with the resulting film likewise being hated by Godzilla fans and by Toho Films, to the extent that the &amp;quot;Godzilla&amp;quot; in this film when later appearing in the mainline films was given a separate identity to the mainstream Godzilla and beaten easily. Liberals also panned the film, particularly a running gag in which the Mayor of New York cast a &amp;quot;thumbs up and thumbs down&amp;quot; vote as an unsubtle jab at Siskel and Ebert.&lt;br /&gt;
|$136,314,294&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Good Will Hunting]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Left-wing actors/writers [[Matt Damon]] and [[Ben Affleck]] created this coming-of-age film that is the main reason why [[Howard Zinn]]'s anti-American revisionist textbook ''A People's History of the United States'' became both public knowledge and provided in all universities and high schools across America. Matt Damon's character, Will Hunting, tells [[Robin William]]'s character in a pivotal scene, &amp;quot;You wanna read a ''real'' history book? Read Howard Zinn’s ''People’s History of the United States''. That book’ll f*****’ knock you on your a**.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/5/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$225,933,435 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Gringo''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This movie egregiously promotes pot smoking. In addition, the main male character is extremely feminine, which suits Hollywood's stance on the traditional gender roles. This movie didn't even make the Top 10 its opening weekend, despite heavy marketing.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hair''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the Broadway musical, the film's profanity, its depiction of the use of illegal drugs, its treatment of sexuality, its irreverence for the American flag, and its gratuitous nudity caused much comment and controversy, as it did when the stage musical first premiered in 1967. A product of the hippie counterculture and the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the group produced several songs that became anthems of the anti-Vietnam War peace movement.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,284,643&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hairspray''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor [[moral]]s shown, encourages homosexual agenda, bad behavior, such as smoking, drinking, cursing. Many sexual comments are shown. It portrays conservatives as segregationists and those with high expectations in a negative viewpoint. &lt;br /&gt;
|$118,871,849&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Happening''&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A pornographic French movie that exists solely to celebrate abortion.  It also wants you to believe that should abortion become illegal, the crime rate will go up.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,600,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The adventures of two pot-smokers who play up ethnic stereotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,250,550&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hocus Pocus 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This sequel to the great conservative 1993 film ''Hocus Pocus'' takes place 29 years after the original movie. It of course stars leftist actress Bette Middler (who also played Winifred from the first movie), and it features rants against the &amp;quot;patriarchy&amp;quot;. In spite of the Sanderson Sisters clearly meant to be evil child-murderers unrepentant of their crime, the movie tries to make them redeemable, thus showing [[moral relativism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Horrible Bosses''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Three men try to kill their bosses. Two of the three bosses are wealthy businessmen. The film is also filled with offensive language and many sexual references. Was followed by a sequel that however supported the American Dream and capitalism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$117,538,559&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Hottie and the Nottie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (should be R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Ultra-liberal actress [[Paris Hilton]] stars in this movie that glorifies every aspect of the &amp;quot;bimbo&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;dumb blonde&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;valley girl&amp;quot; lifestyles (all of which Hilton herself has embraced over time as part of her public persona) and contains demeaning depictions against those with dark hair and dark eyes, calling them &amp;quot;unattractive&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,696&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The House That Jack Built''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R (should be NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|According to director Lars von Trier, this ultra-violent and sadistic serial killer film is meant to be seen as an analogy for [[Donald Trump]] (or as von Trier insultingly refers to him as &amp;quot;Homo Trumpus&amp;quot;) and his administration. This is a gruesome and vicious movie that glamorizes the murder of women and children - calling it a form of art. It relies heavily on Satanic imagery and Nazi iconography purely to shock and offend. Even most liberals were turned off by this movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Howl''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film about homosexual poet and [[beatnik]]-turned-[[hippie]], [[Allen Ginsberg]].  Promotes the [[homosexual agenda]] and the idea that writing about [[pornography]] is &amp;quot;protected&amp;quot; under the [[First Amendment]] and has &amp;quot;literary value&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$617,334&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''I Love You Phillip Morris''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A homosexuality-themed comedy-drama film about a homosexual inmate who escapes to reunite with his lover.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,037,459&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This final entry in the ''Indiana Jones'' movie series is also a major slap in the face of Indiana Jones, putting him down in favor of his goddaughter. Said goddaughter also justifies stealing an artifact that Indiana has taken by claiming &amp;quot;It's called capitalism&amp;quot;. When Indiana mentions bravely fighting the Nazis, she disrespectfully attacks him for &amp;quot;occupying stolen land&amp;quot; from Native Americans, despite the two subjects are totally unrelated.&lt;br /&gt;
|$&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''It's Pat''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Gender confused movie about the titular character. The film tanked in the box office &lt;br /&gt;
|$60,822&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Jackass]]: The Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Essentially a montage of ridiculous stunts and pranks with no coherent story.&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,255,312 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jeanne Dielman''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Woke liberals defiled the once respected Sight &amp;amp; Sound magazine's Greatest Films of All Time by manufacturing this to be considered the &amp;quot;greatest film of all time&amp;quot;.  In actuality, it's unwatchable feminist nonsense that appeals to nobody but delusional smug woke moralists who think that films directed by lesbians are inherently better.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Jennifer's Body]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This film starring [[Megan Fox]] and [[Amanda Seyfried]] promotes feminism and glorifies [[Satanism]], and contains a lesbian kiss and them making out. It was a victim of Liberal false advertising that promised audiences it would be anti-feminist. Even [[Chris Pratt]], who had a minor role as a police officer, couldn’t save the film. It gained a cult following among Liberals and those who believe in the homosexual agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,204,793.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Unfortunately, Christian movie star, Chris Pratt, cannot save this film from being a liberal disaster. This film, like its predecessor, &amp;quot;Jurassic World,&amp;quot; is also very supportive of feminism. In fact, that is even more apparent, as Chris Pratt's character - Owen Grady - is depicted as heartless for not wanting to save the dinosaurs and preferring to be left alone; on the flip side, the more feminist Claire Dearing is now a dinosaur rights activist, using Owen's ''Velociraptor'' Blue to get Owen to save the dinosaurs with her. At the end of the film, the dinosaurs are released into the wild, putting billions of human lives in danger and clearly conveying an environmental message. Also, one of the younger characters clearly looks like an SJW, with her character acting as such. Not only that, but one of the main antagonists calls her a &amp;quot;nasty woman,&amp;quot; which is clearly a jab at Donald Trump. According to one of the actresses, Daniella Pineda, there was intended to be a scene (that was fortunately cut) that revealed that her character, Zia Rodriguez, was a lesbian when admitting she was fond of Chris Pratt's character.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-star-daniella-pinedas-lesbian-reveal-cut-film-183618705.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$417,719,760&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kangaroo Jack''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|Don’t let the trailers, posters and title fool you. The film isn’t about a rapping and talking kangaroo. He only appears in 7 minutes of the whole film, making this a big case of Liberal false advertising. Also, it was originally going to be an R-rated mob comedy called Down and Under, but it was retooled because the test audiences liked the kangaroo. The main hero played by Jerry O’Connell grabs a woman’s breasts and is the stepson of a mob leader played by Christopher Walken. Luckily, it had a more family friendly animated sequel with more of the titular kangaroo in 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
|$88,929,111&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kids'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Pornographic film concerning five rebellious underage teenagers in [[New York City]] engaging in graphic sex, violent acts, [[drug]]/[[alcohol]] use, and spreading [[HIV]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,412,216&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Kids Are All Right'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays homosexuality and homosexual parenting as a &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,811,365&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Laramie Project]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|An adaptation of the play of the same name made by HBO to promote the homosexual agenda, including giving a one-sided, extremely biased perspective on the murder of Matthew Shepherd, implying that his murderers had &amp;quot;homophobia&amp;quot; as a motive. It also has a significant anti-religious bent in it, where two of the documentarists (implied to be homosexual) tried to talk to a priest specifically to &amp;quot;piss him off,&amp;quot; and also had one of the members breaking down from a priest being &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot; simply because he implied the possibility that Matthew Shepherd would go to hell if he didn't repent for his homosexual activities.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Legally Blonde 2: Red, White and Blonde''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the patriotic-sounding title (&amp;quot;Red, White, and Blonde&amp;quot;) fool you. It is significantly more left-wing, including promotion of animal rights (the main court case involved condemning animal testing) and also included a homosexual joke involving Elle Woods' pet chihuahua (despite the original film implying that said dog, who was male, was infatuated by the Taco Bell chihuahua mascot, a female).&lt;br /&gt;
|$124.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Léon: The Professional''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgusting film that features an assassin taking an orphan under his wing (even worse, her family shows poor values and are nasty to each other). He then trains her to be an assassin herself to kill the corrupt [[DEA]] responsible for her parents' murder, but also the assassin who's much older than her seems to be [[Pedophilia|romanticized by her]] (in a deleted scene they even have sex).&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,501,238&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|''Lethal Weapon 3''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-gun control propaganda disguised as a buddy cop action film. &lt;br /&gt;
|$144,731,527&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lethal Weapon 4''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The sequel now has a pro-illegal immigration message.&lt;br /&gt;
|$130,444,603&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Little Mermaid'' (live-action remake)&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Race-swapped live-action version of the 1989 animated counterpart and classic of the same name. Case in point, with Disney changing Howard Ashman's original lyrics to suit more &amp;quot;modern times&amp;quot; as described by the &amp;quot;woke&amp;quot; social media minority in the English-speaking West, as well as many of the accomplishments done by the side characters given to Ariel for female empowerment. Many of the men were portrayed as either useless idiots, or evil with Prince Eric (who is now adopted) not being the one who killed Ursula, and that King Triton probably had multiple wives or lovers judging all of his daughters are of different races, at least this would be a rational explanation because it would be absurd even for a Disney movie to imagine having multiple daughters of different races with only a wife or lover. One of the background mermen is even cast by a pornstar, further questioning Disney's already-questionable casting choices. Also, Grimsby's attitude towards Eric being with Ariel is more [[Pragmatism|pragmatic]] rather than [[Idealism|idealistic]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was a major flop at the box office that failed even to break even, and liberals blamed racism due to Ariel now being black despite the original story being Danish, another piece of evidence of liberal and woke hypocrisy and anti-European and anti-redhead racism and bigotry. Cinema workers and [[YouTube]]/[[Tik Tok]] creators denounced a lack of spectators in the theaters for the film, with also videos showing the evidence of that, leading to assume that Disney or corporate bots on social media tried to illegally inflate the box office in order to promote the film and misleading the public, like it happened with the ''Captain Marvel'' movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|$250 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lost World: Jurassic Park''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The film is pro-environmentalist and features John Hammond, the original head of Jurassic Park, hiring environmentalist hippies to sabotage his own company in the name of releasing the dinosaurs back into the wild, with the protagonists being depicted as being in the right despite causing explicit destruction and death via their actions, as well as demonizing the corporation for trying to stop them. Also has an anti-hunting message, as one of the main antagonists is explicitly a hunter; adding to that, one of the &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot; removes bullets from the hunter's gun, putting everyone in even more danger from the dinosaurs, though no one calls him out for it. It is to be noted that such a message not only was not present in the book it was adapted from, but it was, if anything, the complete antithesis to the anti-cloning message from both the original book by Michael Crichton and the 1993 film that adapted it, and that ''Lost World'' acted as a sequel to.&lt;br /&gt;
|$618.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Love Lies Bleeding''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie that promotes lesbian relationships failed miserably and didn't cross $12 million at the box office despite huge casting such as feminist and homo actress Kristen Stewart, Ed Harris, Jena Malone, and Dave Franco.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Machete''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Open borders propaganda about illegals crossing the southern border. Southerners are portrayed as slack-jawed racists. Robert De Niro plays a corrupt Texas senator and Don Johnson plays the racist leader of a vigilante border group.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26,593,646&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Madame Web''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Another feminist superhero movie which ended as huge failure to producers when box office didnt cross 100$ million.&lt;br /&gt;
|80$ million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Mad Max: Fury Road''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Feminist propaganda that endorses and celebrates anarchy. Also, it bears some &amp;quot;[[Plagiarism|similarities]]&amp;quot; to the John Wayne classic ''Stagecoach''. The fourth movie in the ''Mad Max'' film series, first made famous by Mel Gibson in the title role, was released between 1979 and 1985.&lt;br /&gt;
|$153,636,354&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Maleficent''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Apparently represents the idea of revising the ''Sleeping Beauty'' story to focus on a lesbian relationship; although Aurora clearly loves Maleficent as a mother figure, Maleficent takes over the role of the prince and is revealed to be the person whose kiss of &amp;quot;true love&amp;quot; (given on the forehead) really saved Aurora. Revisionist piece which unabashedly promotes the feminist agenda to the extent that most of the males are either villains or useless, even going so far as to heavily hint at a transgender philosophy; promotes hard-core environmentalism, [[moral relativism]], and even Marxism; pretty much ruins the morality tale for ''Sleeping Beauty''. ''The Federalist'' also had a field day with the film stating how it promoted the leftist agenda and citing point by point its agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/06/maleficent-once-upon-a-screed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In particular, King Stefan, far from being depicted as a good father who gave up Aurora to the three fairies to protect her from the curse, was shown not to care for Aurora at all and was willing to let her die from the curse.&lt;br /&gt;
|$241,410,378&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Marat/Sade''&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Inmates in a French insane asylum in 1808 put on a play about [[French Revolution]] figure [[Jean-Paul Marat]], directed by the [[Marquis de Sade]], that devolves into a violent orgy of destruction at the end of the movie.  Basically nothing more than a celebration of violence and nihilism, yet it is lauded by liberal movie critics.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't be fooled by the fact that Hollywood conservative [[Clint Eastwood]] directed this film or that it both takes place and was filmed in the overall conservative city of Savannah, Georgia. It is based on the equally bad nonfiction book of the same name and features LGBT, environmentalist, witchcraft, and anti-capitalist themes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,105,255&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Moonlight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A coming-of-age film that glorifies drug use and [[homosexuality]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,557,396 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=moonlight2016.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Mortal Engines (film)|Mortal Engines]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This USA-New Zealand co-production pushes the feminist propaganda that endorses and celebrates anarchy. Also, it bears some &amp;quot;[[Plagiarism|similarities]]&amp;quot; to many classics, including ''[[Star Wars]]'' and ''[[Total Recall (2012 film)|Total Recall]]''. It presents some message underlying &amp;quot;[[climate change]]&amp;quot;. Currently, the once-in-a-lifetime adaptation of the [[Mortal Engines Quartet|novel series]] of the same name by [[Philip Reeve]] is due to leftist narratives painting the film in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Movie 43''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anthology of short &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; films which glamorize virtually every form of deviant sexuality imaginable. Much of the &amp;quot;humor&amp;quot; is scatological, including a scene with a character who enjoys being defecated upon. Aside from that, ''Movie 43'' is literally one of the worst motion pictures ever made in history, as it has nothing that would make it good, imaginative, funny, charming, or understandable of its existence at all. Won three Razzie awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director (all directors) and Worst Screenplay (all screenwriters).&lt;br /&gt;
|$32.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mulholland Drive''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The makers of this nonsensical art film think homosexuality and fornication in general are &amp;quot;sexy&amp;quot; societal norms.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,220,243&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''My Own Private Idaho''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Two homosexual street hustlers begin having an affair while seeking adventure en route to Idaho and then Italy. One of the more infamous cinematic examples of the homosexual agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|$6,401,336	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Natural Born Killers'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Riddled with violence, drug abuse and sexual references, this movie's main characters are brutal serial killers who are viewed as &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot;. Infamously known for influencing Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold for committing the massacre at [[Columbine High School massacre]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-columbine-shooters/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
|$50,282,766&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Normal Heart''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|TV MA&lt;br /&gt;
|Another [[homosexual agenda|homosexual propaganda]] film that criticizes the [[Reagan Administration]] and general Conservative ideology.  The LGBT community was a strong promoter of this film and insists it is &amp;quot;artful&amp;quot;, when really it is decadent. &lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''No Hard Feelings''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG18&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie starred and produced by feminist and liberal Jennifer Lawrence. The movie showed a parents ruined life over their son to be with promiscuous woman. Despite the huge budget but the movie didnt get success.&lt;br /&gt;
|$45 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Nymphomaniac'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This two-part movie features four hours of non-stop sex and glamorizes the lifestyle of the titular sex addict.  It portrays other [[San Francisco values]], such as homosexuality and S&amp;amp;M, in a positive light. In general, this film was labeled as NSFW. Director Lars von Trier is known for being anti-American and slightly hints at this throughout the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$17,584,083&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ocean's 8''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A feminist woke movie; all the casting was composed of feminist actresses. The movie didn't get the success as expected, and instead of blaming themselves or the direction of the movie, the feminist cast blamed the public and &amp;quot;patriarchy&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$70 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Odd Life of Timothy Green''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite an overly schmaltzy pro-family sentiment, this film showcases terrible parenting.&lt;br /&gt;
|$55.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''One Sings, The Other Doesn't''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|A disgusting French film that exists solely to promote abortion and normalize it as an essential part of being female.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Organizer''&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|This Italian film supports [[trade union]]s and [[infidelity]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Orgazmo'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|This pornographic nightmare celebrates the porn industry and criticizes [[Mormon]]s, if not all the world's religiously devout. It doesn’t help that it is from the creators of [[South Park]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$602,302 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Parasite'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This Korean film inexplicably won Best Picture at the Academy Awards, even though it has a highly anti-capitalist message and portrays wealth as evil.&lt;br /&gt;
|$167,600,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Paul'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This extraterrestrial rescue mission could have been a harmless comedic tribute to the science fiction film genre if it didn't portray Christians and the military as close-minded idiots while depicting atheists (played by godless writers and co-stars Simon Pegg and Nick Frost) who support extramarital sex, homosexuality, and mind-altering drug use as the only &amp;quot;sensible&amp;quot; people. Pegg and Frost have explicitly stated that one of the movie's main messages is that &amp;quot;there is no God&amp;quot; and anyone who believes in Him is &amp;quot;an ignorant boob&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37,412,945&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Perks of Being a Wallflower''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes homosexuality and also demonizes those opposed to a homosexual lifestyle. &lt;br /&gt;
|$17,738,570&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The People vs. Larry Flynt'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Idealizes [[pornography]] mogul [[Larry Flynt]] and claims that pornography is &amp;quot;protected&amp;quot; by the [[First Amendment]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,300,385&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Peter Pan and Wendy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG	&lt;br /&gt;
|An extremely awful and [[woke]] version of the 1953 animated film, starting with the race-swapping of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, as well as the race- and gender-swapping of some of the Lost Boys. Strong [[feminism]], with Wendy not having any maternal instincts, instead fighting Captain Hook. Tiger Lily - who was previously portrayed as a damsel in distress - is now portrayed as a warrior. None of the girls in the movie compete with each other for Peter Pan’s affections as they did in the original; in fact, Wendy even slaps Peter Pan at one point. The mermaids are completely downgraded, barely even appearing in the film. There is nothing childlike about this film; it was not vibrantly colorful, like the original film. Actually Great conservative film Peter Pan (2003) has more in common with the original film, despite not even being a Disney film.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Philadelphia''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Homosexual agenda-setting drama.&lt;br /&gt;
|$77,446,440&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pineapple Express'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows [[drug abuse]] to be &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$87,341,380&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pink Flamingos''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Embraces horrifying people, who engage in such acts as [[incest]] and [[bestiality]], as well as promoting the homosexual agenda, since it stars transvestite Divine and shows homosexuals in a positive light.  This film has toilet humor, finding it funny when a character (Divine) literally eats poo, and extremely offensive language; one character is even named after a racial slur against white people.  Characters promote anarchy and violence as an everyday thing.  A very graphic film, even for most liberals, showing close-ups of genitalia, unlike any non-pornographic film.  Liberals call it a &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot;, but it is revoltingly horrid and more like an act of [[Satan]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Poor Things''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie starring liberal Emma Stone is full of sex scenes that promote pedophile thoughts on women who have young girls' minds.&lt;br /&gt;
|$35 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Power of the Dog]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Scene after scene of pro-[[homosexuality]] allusions, under the guise of being a Western when there is really no Western content in the movie.  “Where’s the Western in this Western?” asked acclaimed actor Sam Elliott.  &amp;quot;There’s all these allusions of homosexuality throughout the movie,&amp;quot; he added.  &lt;br /&gt;
|Netflix&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Project X''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows teen drinking, [[drug]] use, sex, vulgar profanity, and anarchic behavior to be &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,731,865&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Prom''&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on a 2018 Broadway show, the movie stars a bunch of celebrities from cities like Los Angeles arriving at a rural Indiana town, looking down on the locals for their &amp;quot;backward&amp;quot; ways. The movie is definitely pro-homosexuality, for the main character is seen as right in wanting to attend a dance with a female date, while the townsfolk are painted as bigoted against her because of this. Christianity is also demonized, for a group of Christians at the local mall are labeled as unemphatic because they wanted to follow the Bible and go to church. Middle America - as well as its [[small town values]] that it represents - is also mocked as being stupid and non-progressive, while the urban far-left celebrity lifestyle that the newcomers try to force onto the town is seen as in the right; the main character even sings about how superior living in a city like San Francisco is compared to rural Indiana.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Quills''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays the Marquis de Sade as the protagonist, with an emphasis on extremely violent acts.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,732,088&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rent'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes [[homosexuality]] and cross-dressing as &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; lifestyles. &lt;br /&gt;
|$29,077,547&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Resident Evil'' franchise&lt;br /&gt;
|2002-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R  &lt;br /&gt;
|Feminist film franchise with anti-capitalistic messages. Based on a video game franchise on the same name. The worst offender is ''Resident Evil: The Final Chapter'', where the villain is a [[Christian]] who releases a deadly virus (called the T-virus) which will destroy the human race and have him and rich colleagues rebuild the world in their image (a.k.a playing [[God]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|$244,443,938 (all together)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rise of the Planet of the Apes''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|In this adaptation of ''Planet of the Apes'', a chimpanzee named Caesar is born with a gift of intelligence. When sent to an abusive ape center, he rallies the apes into fighting against their captors in an escape for freedom. The movie appears to be anti-business (the company the main character works for is painted in an extremely negative light), a lot of environmentalism throughout (including a more anti-human agenda being pushed), and the actor who played Caesar, Andy Serkis, as well as director Rupert Wyatt, both compared Caesar positively to the Marxist Argentinian revolutionary terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]]. The movie got sequels in 2014 (''Dawn of the Planet of the Apes''), 2017 (''War for the Planet of the Apes''), and 2024 (''Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes'').&lt;br /&gt;
|$481,801,049&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rock of Ages''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (Director's Cut is rated R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the highly unoriginal and unimaginative Broadway musical, ''Rock of Ages'' features poor [[moral]]s, promotes the homosexual agenda, prostitution, drug use, and drinking, and portrays conservatives in a negative, offensively bigoted viewpoint. Many gratuitous sex scenes and sexual references are prominently shown.&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,518,613&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rocketman''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A biopic on [[Elton John]]. Mostly because of his influence, it has a gratuitous promotion of homosexuality and drug usage, and was particularly infamous for including an explicit sodomy scene.&lt;br /&gt;
|$195.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Salo: Or the 120 Days of Sodom''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Adaptation of the [[sadist]] and [[Libertine]] and atheistic text by [[Marquis de Sade]] from Communist homosexual filmmaker Pier Paolo Pasolini, who was killed shortly after completing this movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Scooby-Doo (film)|Scooby-Doo]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|A supposed live-action satire of the iconic Hanna-Barbera cartoon. Shaggy is heavily implied to be a stoner and is a vegetarian like his original voice actor, Casey Kassem. Velma is implied to be a lesbian, where deleted scenes make it more apparent. Daphne is now a blatant feminist, much like Sarah Michelle Gellar’s Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Fred can be a bit of a womanizer. There are plenty of raunchy innuendos, skimpy clothing among college-age women, glorifying the more decadent stereotype of Spring break, and strong language (including where Fred, possessed by a demon, says the word “b****h”). Pamela Anderson makes a cameo promoting environmentalism. The National Guard is portrayed as helpless. Written by [[James Gunn]], who would later write a more conservative and family-friendly sequel released in 2004. Gunn revealed in 2017 that an even more vulgar version of the film existed before the official movie did.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sex and the City''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Very disturbing film, much like its TV series counterpart, promoting the use of sex everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
|$152,647,258.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sex Tape''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-family. The main premise of the film was two nymphomaniacs trying to create a sex tape of themselves after getting their sex drive killed by their kids, and then recovering their iPods that accidentally uploaded their tape online for everyone to see. The ending also has a brief yet graphic sex scene showing what exactly was on the sex tape.&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,543,473&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[The Shack]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the novel of the same name, this film promotes the ancient heresy of Patripassionism, presents God the Father contrary to how he truly is according to scripture, and promotes the dangerous idea that God does not punish sin.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.gotquestions.org/The-Shack-review.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$96,942,115&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shakespeare in Love''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals changing history in order to suit feminists. The film also suggests that a woman was responsible for William Shakespeare's work (even though there's no record of this at all). Although it won the Academy Award for Best Picture of 1998 (thanks to the aggressive campaign tactics of the egotistical producer Harvey Weinstein), the film has aged poorly and, to this day, the overwhelming majority of critics and film viewers believe that the conservative film and Steven Spielberg's masterpiece ''Saving Private Ryan'' should have won instead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SrNphaLsDs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$100,317,794&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Shape of Water''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgusting pro-Bestiality and Feminist movie directed by Marxist film director Guillermo del Toro. Also encourages homosexuality and has hints of promoting illegal immigration. &lt;br /&gt;
|$54,185,844&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''She Hate Me''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Taking jabs at capitalism and supporting the [[homosexual agenda]], this film has a very over the top plot were a man who's laid off from his job for exposing corrupt business practices, turns to impregnating wealthy lesbians for profit. (This really is the plot).&lt;br /&gt;
|$366,037&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Showgirls''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with explicit nudity, and promotes homosexuality as well as Hollywood values, as it glamorizes the Las Vegas showgirl and stripper lifestyle. MGM also, in an attempt to make it the next ''Rocky Horror Picture Show,'' ran a massive marketing campaign, including an audience-participation script, despite its rating. The film had notoriously terrible production values as well; despite MGM's efforts, the Razzie Awards gave it the &amp;quot;award&amp;quot; for worst film of 1995.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sixteen Candles''&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Would be PG-13 today).&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies teenage sex, underage drinking, and cigarette smoking&lt;br /&gt;
|$23,686,027&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Small Soldiers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-military (due to the Commando Elite being depicted in a negative manner, and to a certain extent, GloboTech, the ones responsible for the bad events in the film, being stated to be a Defense Contractor) and also anti-Capitalist (due to GloboTech being the ones responsible for the events of the film, including buying out the Heartland Toy Company).&lt;br /&gt;
|$71.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Snow White''&lt;br /&gt;
|2025&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Another woke movie from [[Disney]] with race swapping of protagonist [[Rachel Zegler]] who expressed her hate to America and support of terrorist [[Hamas]] attack against Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
|$240–270 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Social Network'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the [[gossip]] website [[Facebook]], which feeds [[narcissism]] and destroys marriages.  The film also portrays drug use and [[misogyny]] in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$96,962,694&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Spring Breakers'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|From the creator of ''Kids'', this film is similar in its pornographic nature and glamorization of drug abuse, only this film takes it to a new extreme. Furthermore, this film promotes [[feminism]] and glamorizes the gangster/[[ghetto]] [[rap music]] lifestyle, while condemning Christians, labeling them as &amp;quot;weak&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;insecure&amp;quot;. Also, the film contains a full-on sex scene in the pool, and shows nudity, not only in that scene but also in several others.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,724,284&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek Beyond''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The film has [[Sulu|Hikaru Sulu]] as a &amp;quot;married&amp;quot; homosexual with an adopted daughter, which was a decision that even [[George Takei]] (Sulu's original actor and a prominent homosexual activist) took issue with.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://time.com/4398071/george-takei-simon-pegg-sulu-gay-star-trek-beyond/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$343.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Stepford Wives''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Feminist]] [[polemic]]. Ends with the protagonist beating her husband with an iron fireplace poker. The film's release coincided with the height of the [[ERA]] movement.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Stonewall''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the 1969 Stonewall Riots, this film is a pro-homosexual film that pushes the homosexual agenda. It's rather ironic to note that the film itself is a victim of historical revisionism, offensive racial stereotypes, and exclusion of the representation of minorities. While the filmmakers tried to defend their artistic decisions, the film was overwhelmingly criticized by critics and audiences (even liberals, not surprisingly, hated it) and failed to make its case for awards consideration during the 2015 Oscar season.&lt;br /&gt;
|$187,674&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Straight Outta Compton''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the gangster lifestyle and gangster rap, and portrays the [[police]] as racist, along with other anti-police aspects. &lt;br /&gt;
|$161,197,785&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Superbad''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes the teenage use of drugs, smoking, alcohol, and sex. The whole point of the movie is for a couple of guys to lose their virginity, which luckily failed by the end. The movie contains many uses of profanity, underage drinking, and drug use. The police are portrayed as dumb.&lt;br /&gt;
|$121,463,226&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Super Mario in real life''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; made by notorious Marxist Leah Hillman promotes drug use and the homosexual agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|$550&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Taking Woodstock''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the anarchistic and chaotic Woodstock festival in 1969 as well as the Hippie Movement, painting their various lewd actions, including homosexuality, in a positive light. Also has some elements of anti-Semitism due to the main character's parents, who acted as Holocaust survivors being portrayed in an unsympathetic light.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2009/08/28/taking-woodstock-mythologizing-the-worst-generation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$10 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tammy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Movie about a lazy unemployed woman who after losing her job, basically turns to a life of crime. As the film is about her and her grandma hitting the road, committing robberies, doing illegal prescription drugs, and buying beers for teenagers.  They have a Fourth of July party with no typical patriotic festivities, and is more like a drunken sex party, as the grandma reveals her breasts to the guest (the audience does not see them though).  &lt;br /&gt;
|$84,525,432&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tank Girl''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the left-wing comic, this film glorifies feminism and debauchery while making the capitalists the bad guys.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,064,495&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ted''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Do not let the idea of a talking Teddy Bear fool you; there is nothing childlike about this film. In an extremely raunchy comedy style, it normalized much of the liberal agenda, such as marijuana addiction, blasphemous language, and gay marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
|$218,815,487&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ted 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sequel to the film, which is equally as raunchy and vulgar. This film did not even make half as much as the original.&lt;br /&gt;
|$81,476,385&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Thank You For Smoking''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The title is self-explanatory, depicting cigarette endorsers as heroes. &lt;br /&gt;
|$24,793,509&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''That's My Boy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R (originally NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite staring conservative actor Adams Sandler this films depicts pedophilia, statutory rape, gerontophilia, child neglect, incest, and other forms of aberrant sexuality as &amp;quot;funny&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$57.7 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''There's Something About Mary''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains gratuitous sex and jokes about bodily functions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$176,484,651&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The To Do List''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Promoting sexual promiscuity and feminist sexual thoughts to teenage girls.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Till Death''&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This survival misandrist movie starring [[Megan Fox]] normalizes cheating on husbands, and ended with the survival of the cheating wife. The movie ended horribly at the box office&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''To Find a Man''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Pretty much a 90-minute abortion propaganda film.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Trash H*****s'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows decadent behavior in a positive light and glamorizes sexual deviancy.  Also the film is riddled with profanity, even the title has a naughty word (which was censored here).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Uncle Sam''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the heroes as a jaded amputated war veteran and a draft dodger, and the main villain as an extremely sociopathic soldier who joined the Army to kill as many people as he wanted, and the latter is depicted as being hyper-patriotic.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Under the Same Moon (La Misma Luna)''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Baselessly supports illegal immigration despite a pro-family sentiment.&lt;br /&gt;
|$23,311,391&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Unfaithful''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-18&lt;br /&gt;
| A sexually explicit movie that sympathizes with the cheating wife, ended up not being punished.&lt;br /&gt;
|$50 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Up In Smoke''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Stoner film that just promotes the use of marijuana.&lt;br /&gt;
|$44,364,244&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Vicky Cristina Barcelona''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Promoting sexual promiscuity, threesome relationships, adultery, and prostitution.&lt;br /&gt;
|$96.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Waterworld''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Suggests that &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot; was real, and the Earth has now become a flooded post-apocalyptic wasteland.&lt;br /&gt;
|$88,246,220&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Whale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie that demonizes [[Christianity]] because it's against homosexuals. Charlie (played by Brendan Fraser) abandons his family to be with a man, and after his &amp;quot;boyfriend&amp;quot; kills himself, he becomes The Whale, and starts masturbating to gay porn.&lt;br /&gt;
|$17.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Whatever Works''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A promotion of liberal values including homosexuality, nihilism, and various forms of sexual deviancy such as May-December Romances, misanthropy, and promiscuity, and also implies that even those with the strongest faith in Christianity and conservative have it vanish in an instant upon setting foot in New York City.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2009/07/16/whatever-works-doesnt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also notable as Woody Allen overtly pushing nihilism and complete selfishness as an absolute positive, in stark contrast to past films where he at least depicted some negative consequences to selfish behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2009/07/03/Review--Whatever-Works/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$35.1 million&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&amp;amp;id=whateverworks.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Wolf of Wall Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly promotes excessive, endless drug use, portraying it in a positive light, and claiming that illegal drugs such as [[heroin]] give people the will to keep working hard and stay focused and positive, as well as various forms of graphic and illicit sexual activity and voyeurism, (both heterosexual and in one scene, homosexual) and non-stop use of the f-word and hundreds of other profanities throughout. Portrays capitalists on [[Wall Street]] as greedy self-absorbed criminals obsessed with sex, drugs and violence in the form of the protagonist Jordan Belfort. Many audiences were shocked that this did not receive an NC-17 rating upon its release, especially since morality-deprived director [[Martin Scorsese]] broke the ''[[South Park]]'' movie's record for most uses of the F-word with his film. Christina McDowell, the daughter of Tom Prousalis, one of the people involved in Belfort's crimes, wrote a memoir on the subject specifically to call out Scorsese and DiCaprio for failing to recognize the victims of Belfort in the film, something even the most praiseworthy critics of the film admitted was a flaw.&lt;br /&gt;
|$116,900,694&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''A Wrinkle in Time''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A live action adaptation of the book of the same name by Disney, the film managed to completely cut out many references to Jesus Christ and biblical verses, as well as completely altered the joyous singing to remove any reference to God.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/faith/disneys-wrinkle-time-erases-books-bible-quotes-cuts-jesus-christian-figures-history/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Needless to say, it opened to a box office bomb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://movieweb.com/a-wrinkle-in-time-movie-review-2018/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$132.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Woman King''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie demonizes men with a fake story, which shows the movie's hero as a slave liberator, while she is actually an enslaver.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDYNImHt73g&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|50$ Million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''W.R.: Mystery of the Organism''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Essentially a plotless film riddled with disgusting orgies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''X-Men'' franchise&lt;br /&gt;
|2000-2019&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (R for Deadpool &amp;amp; Deadpool 2)&lt;br /&gt;
|Unlike the comics they're based on (which were about civil rights)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nuskool.com/learn/lesson/mlk-and-malcolm-x-the-civil-rights-movement-and-the-x-men-origins/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; liberals used this movie franchise to further the [[homosexual agenda]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T543J2L-gXU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cracked.com/article_20497_5-great-movies-with-mind-blowing-symbolism-you-didnt-notice.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bryan Singer director of four of the films (whom is also homosexual) was also cited for sexual assault of a minor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/18/business/media/in-lawsuit-director-of-new-x-men-film-is-accused-of-sexual-assault.html?rref=homepage&amp;amp;_r=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And the sexual abuse has continued to this day especially with the various similar scandals that came out in Hollywood starting with Harvey Weinstein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/11/08/usc-taking-student-petition-remove-bryan-singers-name-cinema-school-seriously/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Likewise, it was noted that Singer during filming for the first movie did not allow for the comics to be on the set, despite the film being based on them.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://fourcolormedmon.blogspot.com/2017/11/3-filmmakers-working-on-comics-projects.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was also anti-Military, especially in the second film and to some extent X-Men Origins: Wolverine, as the main villain, William Stryker, was the head of a para-military group and depicted as very genocidal against mutants, and was also implied to be a Vietnam War veteran. This had been added in by screenwriter David Hayter, due to his experiences with the ''[[Metal Gear Solid]]'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,817,894,919	(all together)  &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Animated Films==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alita: Battle Angel'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|From producer [[James Cameron]] and director [[Robert Rodriguez]], this American film loosely based on the Japanese manga with the same name supports [[feminism]], [[environmentalism]], [[illegal immigration]] and [[anti-capitalism]], as the villains of the film are depicted as wealthy slavers who live above the poor ghettos. In contrast, the heroes are violent street thugs who hate money.&lt;br /&gt;
|$404,800,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alpha and Omega''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animated film about wolves promotes disorderly conduct through the zany antics of an omega wolf named Humphrey. It can also be seen as pro-environmentalist, as some members of the wolf pack try to start eating berries rather than caribou, even though wolves are natural carnivores. Alpha wolves are portrayed in an elitist light for being determined and hardworking. One female wolf, Kate, can be described as a modern feminist. Like the other liberal film, ''Open Season,'' it spawned multiple unnecessary direct-to-video sequels. It is also somewhat comparable to the other liberal film, ''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals'', but in that movie's case, it had a subsequent television series, ''Back at the Barnyard'', rather than film sequels.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,107,267&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alpha and Omega'' sequels&lt;br /&gt;
|2013-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|These direct-to-video sequels follow the characters from the first ''Alpha and Omega'' movie and show the same themes from that film. The sequels encourage disobedient behavior, as Kate and Humphrey's pups are snarky brats who ignore their parents' orders to stay home; they even try to justify this in the sixth movie by claiming they get into &amp;quot;situations&amp;quot; because they're told to be kind and caring. An instance of racism is shown in the fifth film by three porcupines being told to be friends because they look alike.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A (Direct to Video)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Animal Farm''&lt;br /&gt;
|2026&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Shockingly distributed by Angel Studios, Andy Serkis's adaptation of ''[[Animal Farm]]'' goes against a lot of what the original story stood for, becoming a generic kids' movie with a sinister undertone. This cautionary tale about communism has been turned into a screed against capitalism, with Pilkington (reimagined as a woman in this adaptation) serving as a blatant expy of Elon Musk, showing that the left has never forgiven Musk for teaming up with President Donald Trump. This also implies that the pigs only turned evil because of capitalism; while Orwell himself had criticisms of capitalism, the movie's message keeps getting hammered over the audience's head. It was met with complete derision by both sides of the political aisle, some joking that the windmill in the movie would be a generator fueled by Orwell &amp;quot;rolling in his grave.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|TBA&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Animals United'' (Konferenz der Tiere in German)&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A goofy meerkat and a pacifistic lion journey with other animals from around the world (a polar bear, two tortoises, a kangaroo, a Tasmanian devil, and a rooster) to take down a dam built by humans, which had caused the Okavango Delta to dry up. This movie, based on a children's book, promotes a heavy environmentalist message, with the animals saying that all humans are causing harm worldwide (such as melting a polar bear's snowy home and setting the Outback on fire). The movie's ending amps up the environmental message to eleven, with many animals storming the cities and news reporters saying the animals will make humans pay for ruining the world.&lt;br /&gt;
|£2,133,051&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''An American Tail 3: The Treasure of Manhattan Island''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This film, unlike the other three ''American Tail'' films, definitely has a liberal bent.  Not only does it vilify businessmen (though it, I suppose, was mocking the Robber Barons and might have had some merit in that regard)  What is harder to excuse is pushing the point of white/European guilt of what happened to the Native Americans, even making Fievel, who himself fled from a bad situation in Russia, somehow feel responsible for the plight of the Native American mice.  This film and the negative reception were ultimately responsible for the death of the ''American Tail'' franchise. &lt;br /&gt;
|N/A (direct to video) &lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Ant Bully''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This pro-Communist film's main message of the power of the individual to be more powerful than one another is portrayed as a good thing. The exterminator, apparently the main antagonist, is vilified for simply doing his job, thus giving the animation an environmentalist message.&lt;br /&gt;
|$28,142,535&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Astro Boy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Based loosely on the 1952 manga and 1963 anime, liberal producers and writers twisted the cartoon to fit their [[Communist]] agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4Jqlxd7ufM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This strategy backfired, however, and the film was a critical failure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/astro-boys-abysmal-opening-and-imagis-sinking-ship-17586.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
|$19,551,067&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Set in a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of actual humans, this ''Lion King'' clone stars a bull who witnesses his father die after being wounded by coyotes, then he gradually accepts the responsibilities that come with being the leader of his animal community. Nevertheless, ''Barnyard'' accepts disorderly conduct because the animals still party recklessly, even with a serious and dedicated bull in charge. Plus, it portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid and persecutes coyotes for being carnivores. The neurotic ferret Freddy goes to liberal lengths to avoid the temptation to eat his rooster friend by becoming a [[vegetarianism|vegetarian]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and [[gambling]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$116,500,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battle for Terra'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animation has environmentalist overtones and portrays a Bible-quoting, American-esque military general as the main antagonist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,647,083&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Brave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup regardless of the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film, and was created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. It also has a setting similar to the Great Conservative Film ''How to Train Your Dragon'', which was released two years earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
|$540.4 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cars 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This Pixar sequel demonizes oil companies while aggrandizing ethanol (mentioned as Allinall). On the film's political agenda, director John Lasseter commented: &amp;quot;Why isn't alternative fuel more... Why isn't everybody jumping on that bandwagon? It makes so much sense: Electricity, solar, whatever. There's ethanol. There's all this stuff you could be doing. And so I thought, well, that could be really cool in that you could have big oil versus alternative fuel. That's when we kind of crafted the bad guy's story.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$191,450,875&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chicken Little''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This painfully unoriginal animation, which was adapted from a 1943 World War II propaganda short by conservative filmmaker Walt Disney (which was itself adapted from one of Aesop's fables), ridicules family values, especially when the title chicken's widower father, Buck &amp;quot;Ace&amp;quot; Cluck, is shown to be willing to disown his son. Later on, when the aliens proceed to attempt to invade and detonate Earth, it is simply because they thought it was a living organism that kidnapped one of their children. The film is borderline nihilistic because the townspeople are mean-spirited and frequently bully Chicken Little, and a brief gag implies that warping someone's mind against their will is acceptable. As one of the worst theatrical productions ever made by the Walt Disney Company under [[Michael Eisner]] (both critics and audiences agree on this), and even the very first Walt Disney Animation Studios' full-length feature completely animated in 3D (so not exactly a good start), the film's mean-spirited and deeply cynical plot line is suspected to have been done to compete with [[DreamWorks]] animated films helmed by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$135,386,665&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Delhi Safari''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A leopard cub and his mother in India join a gang of animals (a bear, a monkey, and a pet parrot) on their journey to Delhi to make the humans stop destroying their homes. This movie is very environmentalist, with examples of the parrot Alex pleading with humans to &amp;quot;share the world&amp;quot; with animals, which results in environmentalist laws being passed and apartment buildings being canceled.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3.10 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Delgo''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This [[pagan]] film has horrible scenes of violence, war, and mass murder. It performed so horribly at the box office that it was criticized for potentially traumatizing young children and was pulled from theaters after a week. It is currently the lowest-grossing computer-animated film of all time.&lt;br /&gt;
|$694,782&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Emoji Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13 for multiple references to the dreaded S-word in profanity)&lt;br /&gt;
|Not only is this film clearly an infomercial for various smartphone applications and features thinly disguised as an unoriginal take on the &amp;quot;hero's journey&amp;quot; story archetype, but it appears to devalue human language: the main teenager, Alex, can only win over his crush by communicating via text messages comprised exclusively of emojis, and a background teenager even says, &amp;quot;Words aren't cool.&amp;quot; Openly homosexual writer and director Anthony &amp;quot;Tony&amp;quot; Leondis considers the movie a deeply personal project for him: the main character is a sentient emoji who is different from his friends with his ability to show multiple expressions, which reflects Leondis' laughable belief that he is an outcast when, in reality, Hollywood praises that sort of sinful sexuality. The film briefly glorifies [[Facebook]], the world's largest social network and a hotbed for narcissism and relationship destruction; it gives minor lip service to feminism in the form of Jailbreak, a computer hacker girl emoji who refuses to be the princess emoji she was created to be; and has been unfavorably compared to ''Wreck-It Ralph'' and ''Inside Out'', two great conservative animations, plus the ambiguously conservative ''LEGO Movie''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydvQB-4bBfQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Worst of all, TJ Miller, who voices the lead emoji, once said the film is a subtle protest against [[Donald Trump]] based on allegations that Trump wants to censor Hollywood and other liberally biased media.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,650,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The End of Evangelion''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|With Shinji Ikari failing to do his duty until his boss (Misato Kasuragi) and partner (Asuka Langley Soryu) were killed, along with Shinji masturbating over Asuka earlier, we have one of the most depressing movies ever made, which ends with the destruction of the world.&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''FernGully: The Last Rainforest''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmental [[propaganda]], with an anti-industry message, is indoctrinated into children.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,650,296&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Food Fight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Aside from being considered one of the worst computer-animated films, the film vilifies capitalism and leading companies.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Free Birds''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animated film's main premise is taking turkey off the Thanksgiving menu.&lt;br /&gt;
|$55,750,480&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Gnomeo and Juliet''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This disturbing love story contains a joke that could be interpreted as passing off bestiality (in this case, with a garden gnome, which is normally an ''inanimate object'') as funny.&lt;br /&gt;
|$194 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Happy Feet''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This environmentalist film about singing penguins - and a misfit tap-dancing penguin - pushes the envelope to some extent with sexual humor and implied persecution against Christians.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/3/22/6-kids-films-filled-with-green-propaganda/2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$198,000,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Happy Feet 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Like the first ''Happy Feet'', this penguin movie does not push the envelope too much in terms of sexual humor, but it goes even further with environmental themes, pushing the global warming agenda. Staunch liberal actors Matt Damon and Brad Pitt voice two krill who are implied to be homosexual.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,006,466&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Home''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains environmental, illegal immigration messages, and somewhat supports the homosexual agenda as well. The male alien cross-dresses, and it features plenty of potty humor. The film also rejects hierarchy and tradition. &lt;br /&gt;
|$177,397,510&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Legend of the Titanic''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making a statement against the whaling industry. It even has a 2004 sequel, which is not only horrible but also flat-out bizarre.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lightyear''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Described as a [[gay]] ''[[Toy Story]]'', filled with pro-[[homosexual]] propaganda for kids.  Produced by [[Disney]], this film ignores all the events from the great conservative film about Buzz Lightyear, released 22 years earlier.&lt;br /&gt;
|disappointing $55M opening&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mars Needs Moms''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A 9-year-old boy named Milo defies his mother, behaves in disorderly conduct, and is somewhat [[Nihilist|nihilistic]]. Family values are poked fun at. It also has a brief scene poking fun at the great conservative leader, [[Ronald Reagan]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$39 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Minions''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This spinoff prequel to the ''Despicable Me'' films begins with the &amp;quot;evolution&amp;quot; of the minions, which flies in the face of the creationist truth. The film shows the minions evolving from single-cell organisms in the ocean, suggesting that God does not exist. This film also glorifies criminality. Not to mention, it seems to sympathize with a family that has robbed a bank, an action which is congruent with the liberal idea of not working hard for wealth. A sequel, titled ''The Rise of Gru'', was released in 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1.159 billion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Norm of the North''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This poorly received animation casts an environmentalist polar bear as the hero and vilifies major businesses through a greedy real estate mogul, possibly as a jab at Donald Trump. Three sequels promoting the same environmental message have been released since 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Nut Job''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|An incorrigibly self-serving exiled squirrel finds himself helping his former park creatures survive by raiding a nut store, which celebrates disorderly conduct, nonconformity, and environmentalism. One of the antagonists is a head businessman because he does not comply with environmentalism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,251,541&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Nut Job 2: Nutty by Nature''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|In the sequel to ''The Nut Job'', the businessman villain returns to try to build an amusement park, again persecuted for not being an environmentalist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26,989,904&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Open Season''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Although conservative star Gary Sinise appears, environmentalism and hate speech against hunters run rampant. It has had three sequels since then, each of lower quality.&lt;br /&gt;
|$85,105,259  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Over the Hedge''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Based upon the comic strip of the same name, animals struggling to steal food from trash for the winter are the heroes. At the same time, humans are painted as ignorant, uncaring towards animals (clearly an environmentalist message), and obsessed with food. Plus, a businesswoman is the main antagonist, and an exterminator is scorned for simply doing his job. In addition, one of the other main antagonists of the film (and the only animal main antagonist), Vincent the Bear, is villainized for forcing RJ the Raccoon to replace the food he had after the latter in a botched attempt to steal food that Vincent had hoarded for the winter ended up accidentally destroying the food stash, with an ad-libbed scene in the climax having Vincent admit that he got where he was by &amp;quot;backstabbing, betraying, and murdering&amp;quot; those that placed trust in him, which can be interpreted as a dig against Capitalism and the concept of private property.&lt;br /&gt;
|$155,019,340&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''ParaNorman''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The very ending of the film pulls a swerve and reveals that one of the characters, Mitch Downe, is homosexual, ignoring the fact that he was not even implied to be that earlier. This decision had been made by the director Chris Butler.&lt;br /&gt;
|$107.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Peter Rabbit''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged, in the articles &amp;quot;Unintentionally Sympathetic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Unintentionally Unsympathetic,&amp;quot; that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel, ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'', was released in 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
|$146,983,492&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Pocahontas (1995 film)|Pocahontas]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism. Also, unlike the film character, who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-expected box office receipts.&lt;br /&gt;
|$141,579,773&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Quest for Camelot''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|This revisionist take on Arthurian legend throws everything that makes the source material great (Christianity, heroism, bravery, etc.) out the window for the sake of advocating feminism and wanting to be as worthy as a Disney animated musical film (Warner Bros produced this film), only to be panned by critics in the end. Even though it's supposed to be a G-rated family comedy, an incest joke appears as well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.imdb.com/character/ch0100869/quotes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$22,510,798&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sausage Party''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As the first R-rated American animated film to be released by a major film studio in the United States following 1999's ''South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut'', ''Sausage Party'' blatantly criticizes religion and deceives audiences into thinking that, without religion and the existence of God, everyone can enjoy the most selfish, crude, and debauched activities (e.g. humanism, homosexuality, obscenity, and non-stop sexual intercourse) without guilt or a sense of a &amp;quot;religious obligation&amp;quot;. Made by Nitrogen Studios. A typical offensive and raunchy comedy film by modern Hollywood standards, directors Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan, producer Megan Ellison, producer/writer Evan Goldberg, and producer/writer/actor Seth Rogen (all of them fiercely liberal and some, ironically, of Jewish origin) made this film to bastardize the animation genre, as well as to push the liberal Hollywood agenda on politics and religion. For the past century, animated feature films have enthralled and enhanced audiences worldwide, as the best ones tell timely stories that children, teenagers, and adults alike can relate to and enjoy. The makers of ''Sausage Party'' seemed not to care about any of this, as they made this untimely film strictly for adults and believed that there aren't animated films for adults only to enjoy. Their warped belief is made very clear by the film's criticism and parody of many other animated films (namely Disney animations) and the presence of regular Disney collaborator Alan Menken as the film's songwriter. Altogether, ''Sausage Party'' is painfully unfunny and has virtually no plot or philosophical merit. Only liberal-biased film critics praised the film upon its release, while general audiences were repulsed by it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a side note, ''Sausage Party'' has attracted much criticism on two additional issues. First, the animators worked under poor, cruel conditions and were forced by the directors to work overtime without pay. Thirty-six of the 83 animators were blacklisted and went uncredited in the film, believed to be due to their complaints; comments made in anonymous interviews of some of the animators involved in the project by ''Variety'', ''The Washington Post'', and ''The Hollywood Reporter'' alleged that the comments were accurate. All the animators in the film were told outright that they would be blacklisted if they did not work overtime without pay. Second, a red-band trailer for the film was accidentally played before a showing of the Walt Disney Pictures/Pixar Animation Studios' PG-rated and family-oriented ''Finding Dory'', at a Concord, California multiplex in mid-June 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ew.com/article/2016/06/29/theater-plays-sausage-party-trailer-before-finding-dory-apologizes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The theater staff had forgotten to switch out an adult-audience trailer roll for one meant for G and PG-rated films, when adding additional screens to carry ''Finding Dory'' to meet audience demand. The incident occurred only once, and the theater apologized, while Rogen [[Twitter|tweeted]] that the story &amp;quot;made his day&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
|$89,645,124&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Secret World of Arrietty''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Japanese anime film is about a tiny homeless family that steals from regular people. Demonizes capitalism and promotes the redistribution of wealth.&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,202,743&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Strange World''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This pro-environmental Disney movie about an exploration family is also loaded with the LGBT agenda and identity politics. It even got to the point where people started walking out of the theater while the film was still playing.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,600,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tax the Rich: An Animated Fairytale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|An animated film written by [[Fred Glass]], narrated by [[Ed Asner]], and made for the California Federation of Teachers. It repeated rhetoric made by the [[Occupy Wall Street]] group about taxing the rich to have &amp;quot;their fair share&amp;quot; and demonized Capitalism in various ways, including blaming it on Asian sweatshops as well as the housing bubble bursting in 2008. [[Kirsten Powers]], a member of [[The Daily Beast]], and herself no stranger to liberal politics, acknowledged alongside conservative economist for ''The Daily Caller'' Tucker Carson on the Sean Hannity show that the cartoon was simply inexcusable and disgusting, with Sean Hannity also explicitly referring to it as a &amp;quot;disgusting hit piece&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sean-hannity-slams-ed-asner-398102&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://reagancoalition.com/articles/2012/20121206006-ca-union-class.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film was particularly infamous for a scene where, in a segment covering the trickle-down effect, a corpulent rich man representing the 1% of wealthy Americans, after having the scales literally stacked up in his favor regarding money, upon being asked why the 1% needed so much money, he responded &amp;quot;Don't worry, this is good for you too, it will trickle down from us to you&amp;quot;, with the latter statement being accompanied with a graphic of the rich man proceeding to urinate on the other ordinary people as they yell in protest. Although later versions freeze the footage just before the man pees on the crowd in response to the complaints about the scene, it was still implied by residual audio of the urine stream. Sean Hannety and Michelle Malkin of the Sean Hannety Show both expressed disgust with the video when covering it, and when one of the producers confronted Ed Asner as the latter was about to attend one of his roles at a play, the latter falsely claimed he didn't remember what he said on it, and also claimed that the bit about rich people peeing on poor people was disgusting only because it should have been in reverse, and then asked the producer if he had any money, and if so, if he should &amp;quot;p*** on [the producer].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr1ZzsAzq_M&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Mayhem''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A 3D animated reboot film of the TMNT/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise produced by infamously [[woke]], mediocre, narcissistic and toxic actor [[Seth Rogen]], showing the iconic, popular and alluring character April O'Neil, who is classicly a Caucasian redheaded young woman of Irish-Scottish descents, as a cringey and deliberately blackwashed and obese teenager, another victim of modern liberal [[Hollywood]]'s anti-redhead/ginger racism and hatred and also its obesity promotion and propaganda with the misleading and deceitful term &amp;quot;body positivity&amp;quot;. This is also the second time [[Nickelodeon]] blackwashed that character; the first was in the short-lived TV series ''Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tentacolino'' (AKA ''In Search of the Titanic'')&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|The notorious sequel to ''The Legend of the Titanic'' stars the first movie's characters trying to find the sunken [[RMS Titanic]] only to be taken to the mythical city of Atlantis. This North Korean film portrays being held prisoner positively, for the king of Atlantis forces the main characters to stay in Atlantis forever. Don Juan willingly submits to being taken prisoner and coerces his companions to do the same. It also shows disrespect towards the tragedy of the Titanic and those who died on that night by referring to the Titanic as &amp;quot;mythical.&amp;quot; Family values are even set aside when the main characters are more concerned with seeing Atlantis again than with their families back home. A sequel TV series was released in 2011 with the same bad values and strange nature.&lt;br /&gt;
|€4,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''A Troll in Central Park''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Considered by many to be Don Bluth's worst film, the movie stars a troll named Stanley, who is exiled from the Land of Trolls for his love of growing flowers. He ends up in Central Park, where he meets two children. He also ends up a little ''too'' happy when a little girl kisses him on the cheek. The movie's end has an environmental message when Stanley causes plants to grow all over the city, potentially causing trouble for people in New York City. Even Don Bluth admitted this was the worst movie he had created, a statement many directors in the 2020s would never make about their recent flops.&lt;br /&gt;
|$71,368&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Turning Red''&lt;br /&gt;
|2022&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|The film encourages rebellion against parents and is full of suggestive humor and unsuitable themes for children. One of the most blatant themes of this film is a metaphor for menstruation, in which the women in Mei-Li's family turn into giant red pandas. The movie even ends with Mei-Li blatantly telling her mother, &amp;quot;My panda, my choice,&amp;quot; a slogan used by pro-abortionists.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Wish''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The Walt Disney Company's 100th-anniversary film has the hero (Asha) team up with a fallen star to stop the evil King Magnifico from not granting all the wishes that people give him. While Magnifico is the villain of this film, some viewers feel he has a point in not granting every wish, since some could be used for more nefarious purposes. Furthermore, the film claims that humans come from stardust, which contradicts basic theology.&lt;br /&gt;
| N/A (Has yet to be released)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Schlockumentaries==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The 11th Hour]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This environmental schlockumentary produced and narrated by actor [[Leonardo DiCaprio]] endorses the theory of [[Anthropogenic global warming]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$707,343&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Almost any film directed by [[Michael Moore]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|All of his &amp;quot;documentaries&amp;quot; are composed of left-wing propaganda, promoting concepts such as universal health care, socialism, anti-Capitalist views, and gun control, and if that's not enough, he blatantly skews facts to push his agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''American Factory''&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the title fool you into thinking it is patriotic. It covers the Chinese takeover of a GM plant as well as socialism in a positive light, and was made by the production company that the Obamas formed. The documentary gained additional notoriety when one of the producers of the film, Julia Reichert, quoted Karl Marx during her acceptance speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://us24news.com/blog/2020/02/10/oscars-go-communist-winning-producer-quotes-karl-marx-and-obama-praises-her/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[An Inconvenient Truth]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Al Gore]]'s [[global warming]] alarmist [[schlockumentary]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,146,161&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Unanswered sequel to Al Gore's 2006 schlockumentary, ''An Inconvenient Truth''.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Arctic Tale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary film geared towards children that pushes the false narrative of global warming and polar bears going extinct from melting ice caps.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,858,064&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Better This World''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|2011 documentary &amp;quot;feature length lie&amp;quot; is a [[PBS]] film regarding the thwarted domestic terrorist attack at the 2008 [[Republican National Convention]] and liberals attempt to re-write history.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA-TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blackfish''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A [[CNN]] documentary film about the captivity of Tilikum, an orca involved in the deaths of three individuals, and the consequences of keeping orcas in captivity, that is nothing but a propaganda film full of so many lies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://seaworldcares.com/the-facts/truth-about-blackfish/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film gained high ratings on movie review websites, making it seem the film brainwashes critics.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,073,582&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Bowling for Columbine]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A 2002 schlockumentary directed by and starring [[leftist]] propagandist Michael Moore. It is a pro-[[gun control]] film and distorts facts in favor of gun-grabbing. Also included a &amp;quot;Brief history of the USA&amp;quot; segment using animation mirroring that of [[South Park]], that distorted historical facts to make it seem as though guns were implemented by racists, which actually led to the South Park [[libertarian]] creators to condemn him, enough to give Moore a cameo in Team America as a suicide bomber and make his death especially graphic.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21,576,018&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cosmos: A SpaceTime Odyssey&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|TV-PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Darwinism and global warming alarmism are disguised as science.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fahrenheit 11/9''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Donald Trump]] hit piece by none other than Michael Moore. Trump got the last laugh as it ended up flopping at the box office &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C2HyTh_6iyA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fauci''&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This Disney+ documentary about [[Anthony Fauci]] pretty much does nothing but inflate the titular doctor's ego even more. It also downplays the atrocities he has done before and during the Covid-19 pandamic.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The God Who Wasn't There'&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This documentary by noted skeptic [[Brian Flemming]] attempts to reinforce the massive wave of atheist propaganda from the internet.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Jesus Camp]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006 &lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This baseless attack on conservative Christianity later incited [[liberal vandalism]] of the Bible camp shown in the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$902,544&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hail Satan'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Attempts to &amp;quot;humanize&amp;quot; followers of [[The Satanic Temple]] and literal [[satanism]], specifically depicting them as they try to get their monuments to [[Satan]] on government property and push their evil ideology on children, all while vilifying Christian values and portraying Conservative activists like Jason Rapert, an Arkansas State Senator who successfully got a monument of the [[10 Commandments]] erected in front of the Arkansas State Capitol building, as un-patriotic bigots.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hearts and Minds''&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary about the Vietnam War that was inherently anti-American in its nature. Also, depicts [[Catholic]]s as bigots. It also had a brief clip at the beginning which had the rolling crew having one of the higher officers forced to talk to them with the false promise that they'd burn the tape once he is finished with it. It also has several moments of graphic sex between soldiers and Vietnamese prostitutes. It also implies throughout the film that several atrocities conducted by the North Vietnamese communists were done by Americans, including the footage where a girl ends up burned by [[napalm]] and running out naked. Noteworthy for being almost single-handedly responsible for forcing America out of Vietnam (even having the NVA mailing the producers thanking them for &amp;quot;ensuring peace&amp;quot; in Vietnam) as well as it being an influence for far-left schlockumentarist/propagandist Michael Moore, with some of its filming techniques even being reused for ''Farenheit 9/11''.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Inside Job'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Democrat donor Charles Ferguson blames the Great Recession of 2008 on Wall Street, unspecified deregulations, the Bush Administration, and so on. He whitewashes [[Fannie Mae]] and [[Freddie Mac]]'s role and virtually eschews any mention of the Community Reinvestment Act. While advertised as nonpartisan, it contains various interviews with Democratic politicians but none with Republican politicians. Finally, Ferguson blames the financial system for corrupting American politics.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,312,735&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Truthers]] Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe blame America for [[9/11]].  Conspiracy Theorist [[Alex Jones]] worked as Executive Producer (and don't let his paleoconservative/libertarian views fool you into thinking it is in any way a conservative documentary).&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lost in Tel Aviv''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|A couple strives to make a filthy, [[South Park]]-esque animated series.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Makers: Women who Make America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013-2014&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary glorifying [[Feminism]], in particular, the faction that started with [[Betty Friedan]]'s ''The Second Sex''. Also features as examples of role models and pioneers of feminism such degenerates as [[Lena Dunham]] (creator of the liberal TV series ''Girls''), Linda Woolverton, [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Ellen DeGeneres]], [[Jane Fonda]], and [[Gloria Allred]]. On top of that, there's no mention of conservatives [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[Sarah Palin]], [[Phyllis Schlafly]], [[Michele Bachman]] or [[Carly Fiorina]]. Only showing more of their bias.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''McLibel''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997 (TV version)&lt;br /&gt;
2005 (Extended version)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|The fast food industry is blamed for environmental issues in a manner similar to ''Super Size Me'' and the liberal book ''Fast Food Nation''. Unsurprisingly, Morgan Spurlock, the director of ''Super Size Me'', and Eric Schlosser, author of ''Fast Food Nation'', are present.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal Alex Gibney attacks Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Real Charlie Chaplin''&lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Another Hollywood star of the Golden Age targeted by the Left to promote [[woke]] Hollywood's/HollyWOKE's mediocre and deranged hacks and propagandists, even if it means they have to stain their reputation forever with slander and defamation way after their death, as they did with [[Walt Disney]], [[Stan Lee]], [[John Wayne]] and writer [[J.R.R. Tolkien]]. A documentary for woke streaming platforms of highly questionable reliability that tries to depict Charlie Chaplin as a [[pedophile]], instead of an [[Ephebophilia (Sexuality)|ephebophile]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;He was more appropriately ephebophilic and always within legality, there is no evidence that Charlie was attracted to prepubescents or literal children and ephebophilia was generally socially accepted back then, also due to the lack of today's mis/disinformation campaign on the topic, which modern Hollywood contributed to perpetuate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a misogynistic abuser and a tyrant.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.newizv.ru/news/2022-02-18/a-pedophile-a-tyrant-an-abuser-an-honest-film-about-the-private-life-of-charlie-chaplin-has-been-released-389157?amp=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Religulous'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Militant atheism|Militant atheist]] &amp;quot;Comedian&amp;quot; [[Bill Maher]] tries to convince the audience of what he perceives to be the folly of all religion, with a special focus on Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,011,160&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Road We’ve Traveled]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Not rated&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Tom Hanks]] directs &amp;amp; narrates Barack Obama's supposed achievements&lt;br /&gt;
|NA&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Roger &amp;amp; Me''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Michael Moore]] blames capitalism for the downfall of Flint, Michigan instead of the [[trade unions]] that bullied businesses &amp;amp; forced them to ship jobs overseas (due to excessive taxation) or the fact that Flint has been under [[Democratic]] leadership since 1973. Later on, Moore would also admit that he never interviewed Roger Smith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://callcenterinfo.tmcnet.com/news/2007/06/16/2717913.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|$6,706,368 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Selling of the Pentagon''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|CBS pushed this anti-American/anti-Vietnam War propaganda. The producers refused to divulge their sources to the Pentagon, and at least one of the officials involved entered a minor lawsuit against CBS.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dan Rather's Day of Reckoning&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.weeklystandard.com/print/dan-rathers-day-of-reckoning/article/5895&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''She's Beautiful When She's Angry'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Nothing more than feminist propaganda being passed off as truth.&lt;br /&gt;
|$421,573&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=beautifulwhenangry.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Super Size Me'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Morgan Spurlock eats nothing but food from McDonald's for a month to show the negative effects of doing so and tries using this experiment that no sane person would attempt to blame [[obesity]] on great capitalist paragons like [[McDonald's]] and [[Sodexo]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,536,423&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Tillman Story''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A liberals view of the circumstances surrounding the death of football star and [[Army Ranger]] [[Pat Tillman]]. The film portrays each and every fact as sinister. Plus, each and every fact is evidence of a conspiracy. Typical Hollywood [[George W. Bush]] bashing flick. The [[liberal bias]] was clear, make Tillman a liberal [[atheist]] anti-war hero that was cannon-fodder for the government. Tillman's actions speak louder than any twisted accusations presented in this documentary.&lt;br /&gt;
|$802,535&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Under the Gun''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-second amendment, the film was criticized for its inaccuracies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Uncounted Enemy: A Vietnam Deception''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-American/Anti-Vietnam War propaganda that infamously accused General [[William Westmoreland]] of deliberately understating the force strength of the [[Vietcong]] during the Tet Offensive. This resulted in a libel suit made by Westmoreland against CBS that promptly went to court after an internal investigation was issued due to ''TV Guide'' finding damning evidence of similar journalistic malpractice that was practiced in the earlier documentary/propaganda ''The Selling of the Pentagon'', which ultimately resulted in CBS losing its libel insurance, as well as the documentary unit being scrapped when [[Larry Tisch]] took over in 1987.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dan Rather's Day of Reckoning&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Wall Within''&lt;br /&gt;
|June 2, 1988&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary helmed by extremely liberal &amp;quot;journalist&amp;quot; [[Dan Rather]] that reinforced the false image of Vietnam War veterans being anti-social degenerates suffering from PTSD and drug abuse. Was also particularly infamous in that all six of the &amp;quot;veterans&amp;quot; that were interviewed were later confirmed by various documents to have never even served during the events they mentioned, and even the one who actually DID serve did not do so with boots on the ground and was a repairman.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://loonybird.com/media_dan_rather.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-capitalist schlock vilifies [[Wal-Mart]] and other discount stores. Created by the far-left Communist studio Brave New Films. &lt;br /&gt;
|$1.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Winter Soldier''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|The 1972 film about U.S. troops from [[Vietnam]] put on record as baby killers, [[human rights]] violators, and general disservice to America. This myth was propagated by a few anti-war activist liberal actors that never did see combat in Vietnam and some were never in the country. The initial result was to hold hearings in [[Congress]] over the matter. All allegations were proven fabrications, falsehoods, and lies.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Years of Living Dangerously'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmental schlockumentary spearheaded by ultra-liberal, [[James Cameron]], and featuring several proponents of [[Hollywood Values]] trying to preach the false idea of [[climate change]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anti-Christian and Sacrilegious Films==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheist films]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IMDb (Internet Movie Database) is an internet based database of information related to films, television programs, home videos, video games, and streaming content and these works rated in terms of their quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The IMDb list of [[Atheism|atheist]]/[[agnosticism|agnostic]] themed movies indicates in terms of its ratings that there were many that were poorly done and there were many that were certainly not cinematic masterpieces.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.imdb.com/list/ls076551036/ Atheism themed movies - IMDb]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wikipedia]], an online encyclopedia founded by an atheist and [[Agnosticism|agnostic]], has not &amp;quot;Atheist films&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;List of atheist films&amp;quot; articles, but it does have a &amp;quot;List of [[Christianity|Christian]] films&amp;quot; article.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_films List of Christian films - Wikipedia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''2001: A Space Odyssey''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Stanley Kubrick's most notable film was controversial upon its release for its atheistic themes, particularly its support of the [[Theory of evolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,954,992&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''After Earth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This box office failure contains a peculiar mix of both evolutionist and [[Scientology|Scientologist]] themes, and it further tarnished M. Night Shyamalan's directorial career.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60,522,097&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
||Almost any film directed by Luis Buñuel &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Luis Buñuel was an atheist bigoted against Christians.  He unjustly ridiculed Christians throughout his filmography and was a pioneer in making this schlock being considered &amp;quot;art&amp;quot; when it is really just offensive, vulgar and grotesque liberal smut.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Antichrist'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This gruesome film's title says it all: it's full of horrifying imagery juxtaposed to Christian symbols.&lt;br /&gt;
|$791,867&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battlefield Earth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This Scientologist propaganda piece failed at the box-office and is largely considered to be one of the worst movies ever made. It &amp;quot;won&amp;quot; in nine categories at the Golden Raspberry Awards (aka, the Razzie Awards), making it the most awarded film at the Razzies until ''Jack and Jill'' took its place. Furthermore, it won one-time awards for &amp;quot;Worst Drama of our first 25 Years&amp;quot; during the 2005 awards, as well as &amp;quot;Worst Picture of the Decade&amp;quot; in 2010. Lastly, the film plays into the liberal notion of personal characteristics mattering more than true merits: John Travolta is the star because of his affiliation with the &amp;quot;church&amp;quot; of Scientology.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Benedetta'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2021&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|One of the most disgusting displays of blasphemy ever.  Made by liberal atheist Paul Verhoeven, this is a film that dares to insult the sanctity of Catholic nuns by suggesting that they are lesbians and scam artists.  It also insults God by portraying Jesus engaging in graphic sexual acts during a dream sequence and suggests that all Church leaders rape and have sex with women of lesser stature.  Not even the Virgin Mary is safe from ridicule in this awful monstrosity, as a statue of her is carved into a sex toy and used during some of the most graphic lesbian sex scenes.  It is also somewhat of a celebration of BDSM, as many of the torture scenes in the film are depicted as sexual.  A horrendous film that was protested throughout the world.  In the United States, the patriotic pro-family group The American TFP.  It was also outright banned in Russia and Singapore. The film was huge failure to producers with budget of $21.3 million and only got $4.3 million from box office.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4.2 Million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Book of Mormon''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Written by atheists Trey Parker and Matt Stone as what they sarcastically call &amp;quot;an atheist's love letter to religion&amp;quot;, this musical insults every aspect of the Mormon religion as two of the church's elders embark on a mission to Africa. There are several Biblical inaccuracies, which reflects the writers' insane, misguided belief that Christians will believe anything word-for-word if it's written in the Bible. In one song, a group of tribal Ugandans swears against God in the Ugandan language.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Boondock Saints''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The characters are supposed to be Christians (or &amp;quot;saints&amp;quot; as the title suggests), but they show themselves as anything but. They dispense their own form of vigilante justice (summary execution) and say the F-word in every sentence they can. The FBI agent who chases them is hinted throughout the film to be [[homosexual]]. Overall, the film is just a vulgar ''[[Death Wish]]'' rip-off. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Breaking the Waves''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It wrongly claims that God rewards and endorses adulterers and prostitution while vilifying devout Christians.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,803,298&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Canterbury Tales''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972 (Italy and West Germany)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;1980 (USA)&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Directed by communist homosexual Italian director Pier Paolo Pasolini, the film is an utter butchering of the seminal work by Geoffery Chaucer, even including movie-exclusive scenes proving that its viewpoint is inherently left-wing and anti-Christian. Among the most infamous additions include two priests engaging in sodomy (only one is punished via execution due to being poor and thus unable to bribe his way out) and Satan defecating out screaming friars.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Conclave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti Catholic movie that portraying cardinal as intersex.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cloud Atlas'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Supports the idea of reincarnation and features anti-Christian undertones.  Additionally, supports the idea of homosexuality and [[transvestitism]], as many of the characters are resurrected as the opposite sex, while still played by the same actor.  This idea of supporting homosexuality is further brought to the forefront as one of the movie's directors recently came out as having had a sex change operation as a way to promote the movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,108,272 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Craft''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As the title implies, it depicts witchcraft in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,819,936&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Crucible''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based upon the Broadway play by communist sympathizer Arthur Miller, this historical revisionist drama is an allegory intentionally written to compare the Christians of the Salem Witch Trials to the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) and comparing those accused of witchcraft to the communists HUAC hunted, ultimately spreading the idea that American communists of the Cold War era were helpless &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; of HUAC. In real history, John Proctor, one of the accused, was reported as living a “Christian life in his family and was ever ready to help such as they stood in need”, but in the film, he confesses to being a witch and publicly denounces God.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,343,114&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Da Vinci Code]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the book of the same name, this mystery film supports the false theory that [[Jesus]] Christ married [[Mary Magdalene]], pushing feminism and attacking Christianity along the way.&lt;br /&gt;
|$217,536,138&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dead Poets Society''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A worldly literature professor, John Keating (Robin Williams) is shown as inspiring and &amp;quot;open-minded&amp;quot;. This contrasts with the conservative Christian boarding school where he teaches, apparently portrayed as conformist, oppressive, and materialistic. The film also appears to promote teen suicide, as one of the main characters is able to commit suicide without a negative word ever being uttered against his actions by any positive character. &lt;br /&gt;
|$95,860,116&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dogma'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This attack on religion, particularly [[Catholic]]ism, contains cheap smutty jokes and incorrectly makes [[God]] female.&lt;br /&gt;
|$30,652,890&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Elena Undone''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Normalize mother and wife of pastor to cheat on him with lesbian. Normalize also Lesbian in vitro fertilization. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''EuroTrip''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Normalize drugs and sexual promiscuity to teenagers from prostitution to BDSM and incest. then desecration of the campus of the Vatican Church by having premartial sex inside Sacrament of Penance Confessional.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Exodus: Gods and Kings''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The prophet Moses is radically changed into an atheist and a terrorist. Glenn Beck said it essentially turns Moses into &amp;quot;an al-Qaeda member&amp;quot; who &amp;quot;doesn't want to rely on God anymore&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$65,014,513&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Forty Days and Forty Nights''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|In this vulgar sex comedy, the main character has to give up sex for Lent, and his ex-girlfriend tries tempting him to break his commitment throughout. Interestingly, it was released ''during'' the Lent season, so William Donnahue, President of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, requested to both then-[[Disney]] CEO [[Michael Eisner]] and [[Harvey Weinstein]] that they reschedule the airing of the film, citing that &amp;quot;To show a film that parodies Lent in a most vulgar way is bad enough, but to show it during Lent is outrageous.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicleague.org/appeal-to-michael-eisner-and-harvey-weinstein-reschedule-40-days-and-40-nights/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, despite the inflammatory material in the movie, the [[Anti-Defamation League]] head Foxman did not call out the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1083014/posts&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$37,950,822 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Golden Compass'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the atheistic ''His Dark Materials'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,107,728&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hail Mary'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Marxist filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard retells the story of Mary and Joseph in the modern day.  As per his business casual, it was controversial upon its release. [[Pope John Paul II]] condemned it, claiming it was likely to offend the deeply religious because of its explicit nudity.  Additionally, it depicts Joseph as a womanizing man [censored] and Mary in a similar light, as there is a montage where she is completely in the nude for no apparent reason. The film was banned in deeply religious countries such as [[Brazil]] and [[Argentina]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Haunting of Molly Hartley''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Christians are either starry-eyed kooks or homicidal maniacs, while those implied to be Satanists live a happy lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,418,749&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Heathers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes misuse of religious practices in the Catholic Church, including prayers with inappropriate language, using a holy water font to fix one's hair when it's only supposed to be for doing the Sign of the Cross, the priest using profanity which is considered a laicizable offense and never to be used in places of worship, and glorifying homosexual men as martyrs.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hercules''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This film seems to take a more atheistic turn on the Greek hero as opposed to the mythology behind Hercules.&lt;br /&gt;
|$72,688,614 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Immaculate''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-18&lt;br /&gt;
|Just like Benedetta movie, its disrespect to Christianity and Catholic church which stared by liberal actress Sydney Sweeney. The movie mock the virgin birth and create fake story on nuns sexual relations.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Inherit the Wind''&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|This historical revisionist drama contains a series of Hollywood-perpetuated lies about the [[Scopes Trial]] to smear Christianity, including: portraying [[William Jennings Bryan]] as ignorant, harsh, and punitive, based on an incorrect of his actions and testimony; falsely claiming that, at the end, Bryan, in a senseless fit of madness, died in the courtroom amid &amp;quot;caring&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;reasonable&amp;quot; [[Darwin]]ists; and wrongfully depicting Darwinists in a positive light and Christians as &amp;quot;deceitful&amp;quot;. In real life, Bryan and the Christians won the trial and were charitable to the end, while the Darwinist Darrow was deceitful in reneging on his deal to take the witness stand after Bryan did. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Invention of Lying''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Written and directed by British atheist [[Ricky Gervais]], the movie takes place in an alternate reality where the concept of lying does not exist until Gervais' character invents it. As a consequence of lying not previously existing, religion hasn't existed either, so, behind the facade of a romantic comedy, the main message of the film is that all religion is based in lies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingdom of Heaven'' (theatrical version)&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Atheist Ridley Scott directs this revisionist historical piece that portrays Muslims as the &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; of the Crusades. In truth, the Muslims of the day won every Crusade except the first (in which Christians briefly prevailed), the third and the sixth.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Last Temptation of Christ]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The film's eponymous final sequence depicts the crucified Jesus—tempted by what turns out to be Satan in the form of a beautiful, androgynous child—experiencing a dream or alternative reality where he comes down from the cross, marries Mary Magdalene (and later Mary and Martha), and lives out his life as a full mortal man. He learns on his deathbed that he was deceived by [[Satan]] and begs God to let him &amp;quot;be [God's] son,&amp;quot; at which point he finds himself once again on the cross. At other points in the film, Jesus is depicted as building crosses for the Romans, being tormented by the voice of God, and lamenting the many sins he believes he has committed.&lt;br /&gt;
Because of these departures from the gospel narratives—and especially a brief scene wherein Jesus and Mary Magdalene consummate their marriage—several Christian groups organized vocal protests and boycotts of the film prior to and upon its release. One protest, organized by a religious Californian radio station, gathered 600 protesters to picket the headquarters of Universal Studios' then-parent company MCA. One of the protestors dressed up as MCA's Chairman Lew Wasserman and pretended to drive nails through Jesus' hands into a wooden cross. Evangelist Bill Bright offered to buy the film's negative from Universal in order to destroy it. The protests were effective in convincing several theater chains not to screen the film. One of those chains, General Cinemas, later apologized to Scorsese for doing so. &lt;br /&gt;
Mother Angelica, a Catholic nun and foundress of Eternal Word Television Network, described ''Last Temptation'' as &amp;quot;the most blasphemous ridicule of the Eucharist that's ever been perpetrated in this world&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a holocaust movie that has the power to destroy souls eternally.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
In some countries, including Greece, Turkey, Mexico, Chile, and Argentina, the film was banned or censored for several years. As of July 2010, the film continues to be banned in the Philippines and Singapore.&lt;br /&gt;
|$8,373,585&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Legion''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|In this blasphemous film, God uses an army of angels to wipe out humanity, ignoring Psalm 91:11's promise that He sends angels to protect humanity.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$40,168,080 	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Ledge''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Atheist screenplay writer Matthew Chapman confirmed that the main character is the first openly atheist hero in American cinema. Likewise, his work misleadingly depicts Christianity, via the character Jon, as being &amp;quot;bigoted&amp;quot;, abusive, and domineering. Because of this, ''The Ledge'' failed at the box office flop and received generally negative reviews, with the liberal site [[TV Tropes]], similar to the issue with Thomas in the later liberal animated film adaptation ''Peter Rabbit'', even admitting under the articles &amp;quot;Unintentionally Sympathetic&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Unintentionally Unsympathetic&amp;quot; that Jon was ultimately closer to being in the right than the main protagonist, Gavin.&lt;br /&gt;
|$610,986&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The prominent historical figure Joan of Arc is psychologically and emotionally unstable, impulsive, and prone to mood swings, so she leads the French army to victory purely out of selfishness, cruelty, and [[vengeance]]. However, historical evidence proves the contrary. Evidently, this film was made to criticize Roman Catholicism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$66,976,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Monty Python's Life of Brian''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A man is born on the same day as Christ Jesus and is mistaken for the Messiah. Expect an hour and a half of rampant sacrilege to follow suit.&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,398,164&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Monty Python's The Meaning of Life]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It's ninety minutes of absurdist, godless existentialism with a sacrilegious person's view of [[Heaven]] at the end by the staunchly nonreligious British troupe Monty Python. Need we say more?&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,929,552 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Most Hated Woman in America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This biographical drama sympathizes with [[Madalyn Murray O'Hair]], who is responsible for ending official Bible-reading in American public schools in 1963 ([[Atheism and Mass Murder|and disastrous results that liberals refuse to talk about]]), and not surprisingly turns her into a martyr (even though she and her family were robbed and murdered by people working for her own atheist organization).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''mother!''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|leading by atheist actor Javier Bardem. The film mocking Christianity and Bible by making god as poet. &lt;br /&gt;
|$14.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Missionary''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Copying the deranged lover plot device from other films (ex. Fatal Attraction), this film makes the maniac a Mormon.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Noah'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|In a liberal take on the classic story from the [[Book of Genesis]], liberals, going along with their usual ''modus operandi'', shoehorn in harmful messages that had nothing to do with the original story, such as [[environmentalism]], living on a vegan diet, and most notably, insisting that the [[Theory of Evolution]] is &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot;. In addition, many traits of the &amp;quot;antagonists&amp;quot; appeared to be more Biblical than those of the &amp;quot;protagonists&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Patterson, Roger &amp;amp; Chaffey, Tim (March 29, 2014). [https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/noah-movie-detailed-review/ The ''Noah'' Movie: Our Detailed Review]. ''Answers in Genesis''. Retrieved August 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$101,200,044&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Oh! Heavenly Dog''&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the title fool you. The movie is anything but heavenly, as it smears Christianity and presents a false depiction of reincarnation.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ode to Billy Joe''&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Inspired by the popular song &amp;quot;[[Ode to Billie Joe]]&amp;quot; from the prior decade, a main character kills himself after a drunken homosexual relationship (something not hinted at in the song), and the preacher (portrayed positively in the song) is made into a town gossip, causing the main female character to have to leave town to save her reputation.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27M (estimated)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Practical Magic''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 &lt;br /&gt;
|Yet another film glorifying witchcraft and attempting to mix romantic comedy into it (which even puzzled liberal critics).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/practical_magic/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was one of the many wiccan movies released during the late 90's.&lt;br /&gt;
|$46,683,377&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Priest'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly anti-Catholic and pro-homosexual.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,165,845&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|In this storm of political correctness for the sake of political correctness, the Christianity of Robin Hood and his Merry Men is heavily downplayed, save for Friar Tuck's initial bigotry toward the Muslim character Azeem. Azeem, who is not present in the original Robin Hood legends but was created for this version of the Robin Hood saga, is depicted as a wise, open-minded, tolerant mystic. Robin Hood and Azeem are portrayed by liberals Kevin Costner and Morgan Freeman, respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
|$390.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''September Dawn''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This anti-Mormon propaganda piece blatantly distorts history. The Mountain Meadows Massacre was perpetrated by a group of Mormons, but, despite what this movie says, Church authority did not authorize such an act, and they still condemn it to this day. This movie was strategically released in order to muddy the waters of Mitt Romney's 2008 presidential campaign. Fortunately, the filmmakers did not get away with their heinous crimes, as ''September Dawn'' received extremely negative reviews from film critics, very weak box office receipts, and a Golden Raspberry Award nomination.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,066,555&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Silent Hill''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the horror-themed video game series with the same name (go figure), the Christians are the cult-like antagonists.&lt;br /&gt;
|$46,982,632 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Silent Night, Deadly Night''&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A man becomes a serial killer after abuse from the Christian orphanage wherein he grew up. Conservative Christians successfully protested being vilified, and the film was pulled from theaters within one week of its release. &lt;br /&gt;
|$2,491,460&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Spotlight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Another film bashing Christianity. The &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot; uncover a scandal of child molestation in the Catholic Church. The film portrays them as &amp;quot;brave&amp;quot; (because Hollywood hasn't bashed Christianity enough) but ignores the fact that homosexual infiltrators within the Church, seeking to discredit and damage the Church, were responsible for the atrocities and their subsequent coverup. Strangely, the same unspeakable acts have been happening legally in Islamic nations but they are conveniently ignored by the liberal media (if the journalists uncovered that, then that would be an example of bravery). It also downplays the effect homosexuality had by having several characters specifically deny that homosexuality was a factor in their victimization and subsequent turns to homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
|$45,055,776 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek V: The Final Frontier''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Secular humanists are kind, but the religiously devout as violent and ruthless. Even liberally biased critics didn't like it, as it won three Golden Raspberry Awards (Razzie Awards), including Worst Picture of 1989, and was nominated for three more Razzies.&lt;br /&gt;
|$63 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sunshine''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This vehemently nonreligious, apocalyptic film is full of scientific inaccuracy. Christianity is embodied in a homicidal psychopath, who believes that it is the will of God for the world to end. This Christian is willing to kill anyone who gets in the way of what he believes is the will of God. The personified atheism, in contrast, is &amp;quot;sympathetic&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;kind&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;pro-humanity&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Truman Show''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|An atheism and humanism propaganda piece about liberal president Harry Truman. Truman doesn't realize his seemingly ordinary life is a reality TV show, overseen by Christof, the show's heartless and manipulative creator. Christof lives in the fake sky above Truman, watching over him, controlling everything from the weather to Truman's destiny. He is an allegorical substitute for the Christian God. (Notice &amp;quot;Christ&amp;quot; in his name.) Truman must escape from the false world of the show (Christianity) and triumph over Christof. As Truman appears to walk on water in the ending, the film is displaying the false, human-worshipping sentiment that man can replace God and be Lord of his own life.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,542,121&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Victor Frankenstein''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The protagonist of the classic conservative novel warning against the consequences of playing God is now one of the most openly atheist protagonists in cinema.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debatable Whether Liberal==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''21 Jump Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Two police officers try to take down a drug ring in high school, where the villains are environmentalists and drug dealers. But it also contains many sexual references, full profanity, and many religious insults. A parodic comedy remake of the 1987–91 [[Fox Network]] police drama of the same name.&lt;br /&gt;
|$201,585,328&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The 40-Year-Old Virgin''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A bawdy sex comedy about a man who is ridiculed by his peers for his indifference to sex as an adult. His friends, feeling that he isn't &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot;, try to encourage him to lose his virginity, starting with pornography, sex toys, and even prostitution. However, their personal attitudes towards women ruin their own relationships, and the man remains steadfast in his abstinence. Later, he meets a woman who connects with him, but is no longer a virgin, as she has a teenage daughter. At one point, her daughter confesses only to him that she is also a virgin and encourages him not to feel bad about it. However, her mother, who has been on multiple dates with him, is still unaware of his virginity. After their proposed deadline by which the two agreed to eventually have sex, he tells her of his virginity and stays reluctant about giving in. There is some drama and confusion between them, but she eventually comes to accept him, and the two are happily married at the end before having sex.&lt;br /&gt;
|$177.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Accepted''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|It criticizes the [[Department of Education]] (or colleges and universities in general) and our protagonist lives the American dream by starting his own college, but then the juvenile humor, gross-out humor and drug abuse steps in. &lt;br /&gt;
|$36,323,505&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Aeon Flux''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-cloning film, but also pro-feminism as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,874,337 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Aladdin (1992 film)|Aladdin]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the classic Arabian folk tale ''Aladdin and the Magic Lamp'', a poor but charitable thief is sent by Jafar, a sinister vizier, to search for a mysterious oil lamp rumored to contain unbelievably powerful magic. Upon finding this, he accidentally releases the comical genie, who grants his wish to become a prince so he can legally court Jasmine, the sultan's daughter. On the one hand, the film is set in what is implied to be a Muslim state, and Aladdin resorts to lying to try to marry Jasmine. A slight feminist bent is present because Jasmine refuses to marry, ignoring the law requiring it (although, in her defense, it's implied to be a recent law made by her father to be sure she is married to someone to rule the city and &amp;quot;taken care of&amp;quot; because he's &amp;quot;not gonna be around forever&amp;quot;). In addition, some lyrics from the opening song were notably cut for fear of offending the Arab populace, implying that the film is politically correct. The Sultan is portrayed as a massive bumbler and overgrown child, which may hint at an anti-parenthood agenda, but also shows character and authority in a few instances. But on the other hand, the film does ultimately push character integrity because Aladdin ultimately decides against lying and tells Jasmine the truth about himself. Disregarding the film's slight politically correct treatment of Arabia, it ultimately showcases some more negative elements of Islamic culture via a vendor nearly chopping Jasmine's hand off when she &amp;quot;steals&amp;quot; some food to feed a starving child, as well as depicting Prince Achmed in a very negative light via his cruelty to Aladdin and children attempting to stop him. The prince is portrayed as a poor example of a husband, so it is subtly suggested that Jasmine refused to marry because all the princes she encountered had, in fact, been as bad as Achmed. She then falls for Aladdin because he saves her life and shows her kindness. In addition, it is made clear that while Aladdin does steal and initially had an infamous reputation for his thefts, it's solely in order to survive on the streets, with it being heavily implied that he was an orphan, and he also selflessly gives his stolen food to starving children after initially planning to eat it. There is a lesser condemnation against the occult, as the only explicit magic-user besides Aladdin's Genie is Jafar, the main villain, who dreams of becoming the world's most powerful dark sorcerer.&lt;br /&gt;
|$504.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Aliens''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The second film, ''Aliens'', is an anti-Vietnam War statement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T543J2L-gXU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and, like its predecessor, copies another earlier feature (in this case, the 1954 film ''Them!''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVoX-C9J4Zk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;). However, liberal pundits currently denounce it as a pro-war film, and it is to be noted that despite technically pushing anti-Vietnam messaging, it unintentionally ends up being a pro-Vietnam statement at the same time, as the Vietcong stand-in for the film was the titular antagonists, the Xenomorphs, hinting at the Vietcong being depicted negatively. Motherhood is also depicted neutrally. Although the Xenomorph Queen, who is depicted as embracing her maternal instincts, is depicted in a negative light, the film's protagonist Ellen Ripley was also shown to embrace motherly instincts as well and treated positively for it, acting as a surrogate mother to the orphan Newt and going out of her way to protect and rescue her in the film (most feminists even back then, much less today, tend to demonize the concept of motherhood).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alien Resurrection''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The fourth film is overtly feminist. But on the other hand, Annalee Call was also depicted as a Roman Catholic (with the novelization elaborating that she willingly chose to become one due to viewing it as &amp;quot;rational&amp;quot;, which acted as a rare instance of rationality and Christianity being rightly treated as complements, as most liberals tended to act like rationality and religion are completely separate entities since the Enlightenment).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Antz''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Produced by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], Dreamworks's first animated film downplays the military, and possesses an implicit promotion of Communism via the main character, but also has an Anti-Eugenics message too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$90,757,863&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Army of Darkness''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite its unrealistic depictions of demons, it's a pretty gun-centric pro-Second Amendment film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,502,976&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Atlantis: The Lost Empire''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Released during the [[Michael Eisner]] era of [[Disney]]. On the one hand, the main villain is a military commander who would endanger the lost city of Atlantis just to be rich, and it is implied that he would commit treason by selling the power source to the Kaiser during World War I for the same motivation. The theft of the crystal to become rich could be seen as a condemnation of capitalism. That being said, however, capitalism has also been promoted in a more positive light in the form of Preston B. Whitmore, an eccentric but ultimately good-hearted billionaire who funded the expedition in the first place, and in addition, most of the principal cast was shown to have dreams of getting a better lot in society, with it being heavily implied in the ending that they ultimately succeeded in achieving those dreams after selflessly trying to save Atlantis, which acts as an implicit promotion of both capitalism and the American Dream.&lt;br /&gt;
|$84,056,472&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Paints Christmas in a positive light and has Beast learn its meaning while putting aside the past he had blamed for his curse. Also significantly tones down the more feminist messaging from the original film. The manner in which Christmas was depicted, however, was closer to the secular view of Christmas than the actual intended meaning of the holiday being a celebration of the birth of [[Jesus Christ]]. The movie overall, however, is objectively of very low quality and pretty forgettable to say the least, and since it is a direct-to-video sequel/midquel realized by another studio (now defunct) and with a lot of incoherences, it's not even canon in the universe of the original animated classic film that preceeded it.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A (Direct to video movie)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Bee Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|It's debatable whether or not its environmentalist or against it. It does show the destructiveness of environmentalism (i.e. butting into nature's problems in the name of helping her). The anti-human human sentiments in the movie turned out to be wrong, however, the humans are taking the honey made by the bees, similar to the welfare program of taking from those who worked for it. Others believe the movie promotes [[bestiality]], and is just disguised as a family movie. &lt;br /&gt;
|$287,600,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bohemian Rhapsody''&lt;br /&gt;
|2018&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A biopic of [[Freddie Mercury]], the lead singer of the band Queen. While it does show elements of the practice of homosexuality and hedonism, at the same time, the film largely condemns the practice since it was made clear that Mercury's embracing of these things was what ultimately ruined Queen and his personal relationships, and is what ultimately killed him via AIDS. In addition, Paul Prenter, the only other major character to embrace homosexuality in the movie, was depicted in a very negative light, as he was one of the reasons Mercury went down a bad path, with it being made clear later on that Paul largely was using Mercury for his own gratification, blamed others for his bad ideas, and even hid vital information from Mercury deliberately such as the Live Aid concert plans as well as Mary Austin calling him. It also had a promotion of redemption, as Mercury, inspired largely by his former girlfriend/wife, Mary Austin, nearing the end of the film, attempts to reconnect with his band and family and make amends in the time he had left before dying from AIDS. That all being said, however, it's debatable whether the film intended to paint his homosexual escapades in a negative light, as several members of the production company, including Freddie Mercury's actor Rami Malek, indicated that it was a &amp;quot;regrettable&amp;quot; decision as a result of not having enough time to give a &amp;quot;more balanced&amp;quot; view of (ie, promoting) his bisexual lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Brady Bunch Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A parody of the famous 1970s sitcom, the Bradys still act like their normal selves even though it’s set in the mid-1990s. The plot is about Mike owing the IRS $20,000 in back taxes, and with his 1970s architectural style not being hip with new clients, and spending a bunch of money on trips to the Grand Canyon and Hawaii, they may have to sell the house, which is what Larry Dittmeyer needs for his plan to turn the neighborhood into a mall. On one hand, the High School counselor is played by the infamous drag queen RuPaul, and Marcia’s friend Noreen is heavily implied to be lesbian. However, Peter, who’s going through puberty, eventually builds up the courage to knock down the bully Eric Dittmeyer and win over his crush, and the Bradys always stick together, regardless of whether the house forecloses or not, even if the road is rough.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Four members of the original cast cameoed in this film being Christopher Knight as a coach who encourages Eric Dittmeyer to beat up Peter, Barry Williams as a record producer who turns down Greg after hearing him sing “Til I Met You (Clowns Never Laughed Before),” Ann B. Davis as a truck driver who finds Jan, and returns her home, and [[Florence Henderson]] as Carol’s mother. Mike Lookinland was supposed to be a background cop, but that scene got cut.&lt;br /&gt;
|$54.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Campaign''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Political comedy depicts the Democrat candidate (Will Ferrell) as an obnoxious, drunken womanizer and satire of [[John Edwards]], although the Republican candidate (Zach Galifianakis) is portrayed just as negatively as a corrupt capitalist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$33,165,738&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chicken Run''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Produced by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], this vegan propaganda film compares a chicken farm to the [[Holocaust]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynn_A73hcfs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The main villain of the movie is a capitalist who wants to make chicken pies. The film also promotes feminist and anti-American themes. On the other hand, the main villain of the movie is also a feminist, as she calls her husband's ancestors &amp;quot;poor, worthless nothings&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$106,834,564&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cocaine Bear''&lt;br /&gt;
|2023&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This horror-comedy film, directed by feminist Elizabeth Banks, is loosely based on an incident in 1985 involving a Georgia black bear consuming 75 pounds of cocaine. While the bear in real-life died from an overdose, the bear in the movie lives and terrorizes people in the Chattahoochee National Forest in northern Georgia. On the one hand, there is plenty of swearing (even from the kids), blood, and drug use in this film. On the other hand, the movie also shows the damage drugs can do; the two main kid characters try a brick of cocaine but spit it out immediately. A sense of family is also upheld, as the single mother Sari is determined to find her lost pre-teen daughter despite being in the woods with a cocaine-riddled bear roaming around. Two drug-dealers also eventually decide not to carry out their boss's insane orders, one of them - his son - promising to be a better father to his son (he had left his son in the drug boss's care to drink over his dead wife, which his father and best friend call him out on).&lt;br /&gt;
|$&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Coco''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A beautiful animated film about tradition and family. In Santa Cecilia, Mexico, 12-year-old Miguel Rivera secretly dreams of becoming a musician like Ernesto de la Cruz, a popular actor and singer from his great-grandmother Coco's generation, despite his family despising music. After entering the Land of the Dead, Miguel encounters Héctor, a down-on-his-luck skeleton who once played music with Ernesto. Héctor offers to help Miguel reach Ernesto; in return, he asks Miguel to take his photo back to the Land of the Living, so that he might visit his now-elderly daughter before she forgets him and he disappears completely. However, strong [[feminism]] is also present, as the men in the movie are typically weak, and the only strong male figure is the villain. Not to mention it presents a bizarre afterlife without the reality of Heaven, Hell, or any need for the Gospel.&lt;br /&gt;
|$591.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Django Unchained''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Quentin Tarantino's own version of the Django character (there's a scene where the original Italian Django makes a cameo and Tarantino's version speaks to him, another tribute by Tarantino to the Spaghetti-Western genre that has always been his source of inspiration). As common for Tarantino's movies, graphic violence with practical effects and the constant use of the word nig*er is the norm also here, but this time there is one revisionist take on the author of the book ''[[The Three Musketeers]]'', in which German former dentist and now bounty hunter Dr. Schultz tells the racist slave owner Calvin Candie that [[Alexandre Dumas]], the author of ''The Three Musketeers'', of which Candie is a reader, is black and said in a way like he was not even French. This, of course, is universally known and proven to be very far from true, and it takes very little to debunk this gigantic lie. There's also the ridiculously exaggerated reaction of terrorized people when they see a black man on a horse coming into town; this is surprisingly unrealistic for a Tarantino movie. However, the reason this film is in this section is because the protagonist Django, when discussing with Schultz the plan to take Django's wife from Candie's plantation pretending to be in the business of slave mandingos, he mentions that there's no worse dishonor than being a black slave owner, and this is a more unique than rare time in which really and historically existed black slave owners in America (just like black [[Confederates]]) are mentioned in a liberal Hollywood film.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Crow''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The tagline claims our hero is an angel, but he doesn't exhibit any Christian values. However, there is an anti-drug scene where Eric Draven (the hero) makes a drug addict mother realize that her daughter needs her &amp;amp; gets her off drugs. On top of that, the film's villains are nihilist anarchists. The film is notable as Brandon Lee's last, as he was killed in a set accident during production.&lt;br /&gt;
|$50,693,129&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ed Wood''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it does glorify cross-dressing and the [[homosexual agenda]], it still is pro-capitalism, and the film also glorifies the American dream. Despite the obstacles Wood faces, he still continues doing what he loves in making movies.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,887,457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Edward Scissorhands''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Endorsed by the Christian website ChristianAnswers.net, with a 4-star rating. Conversely however, a prominently featured Christian character - the only character in the movie ever identified as Christian - is portrayed as fanatical and bigoted against people with scissors for hands.&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,362,352&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Falling Down''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R 	&lt;br /&gt;
|Film takes jabs at many [[liberal values]], [[illegal immigration]], union workers, multiculturalism, (one scene where Bill tells his ex-wife that the ice cream shop him and his family used to go to is now a Mexican store) and foreign aid (in one scene Bill asks an illegal Korean immigrate a rhetorical question on how much America has given his country and yells at him after he refuses to learn the language).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4tC4qfv92Q&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It's also one of the very few films to be truthful in the &amp;quot;Nazis were right-wingers&amp;quot; myth perpetrated by liberals, in which Bill informs a Neo-Nazi that he's an American and the Nazi is a sick a-hole. As well as many shots where the America flag is trashed upon (which could symbolize how liberalism has trashed everything America has stood for).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piPzExBdfIg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But at the same time it also takes jabs at capitalism, where Bill believes he's no longer commercially valuable. And although the plot is about man trying to reach his daughter's birthday party, the film seems to toy with its audience in suggesting whether he's mentally ill or not, as opposed to a pro-family message.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$40,903,593&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fantastic Mr. Fox''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the 1970 children's book of the same name by Roald Dahl, Wes Anderson's first animated film stars Mr. Fox - an anthropomorphic red fox who used to steal farm birds for a living - growing bored with domestic life. He decides to get back into stealing poultry with the help of a meek opossum named Kylie, but their attempt at one final heist brings three farmers - Boggis, Bunce, and Bean - to target Mr. Fox and his family, and he has to enlist the help of his friends and family to fight back against them. On the one hand, the farmers appear to be capitalists since the store that the animals take food from belongs to all three of them (Roald Dahl had refused to put this in the book when he was alive, saying that it would be too easy a solution for the animals, as well as concerned that it would teach kids to steal). Mr. Fox's son, Ash, is also said to be &amp;quot;different,&amp;quot; possibly referencing being homosexual or transgender, with Beaver's son even mentioning that Ash dresses like a girl. The characters also swear, but since it's a PG movie, they replace these swear words with &amp;quot;cuss.&amp;quot; On the other hand, while Wes Anderson's style of dysfunctional family shows up here, Mr. Fox ultimately loves his family and would do anything for them, even willing to sacrifice himself to save his nephew when the farmers capture him; he also fights his former partner-in-crime Rat to the death when the latter threatens his son and acts lecherously toward his wife. Mr. Fox also faces the consequences of his thieving ways and vows to make it up to everyone, showing that, despite his arrogance, he wants to do right by his friends and family and admits he was in the wrong. &lt;br /&gt;
|$21,002,919&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Fargo]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A pregnant sheriff with traditional American family values solves an elaborate criminal embezzlement, kidnapping, and murder scheme. It remains debatable whether she is a feminist or a feminine protagonist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,611,975	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Furry Vengeance''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This film is environmentalism and anti-[[Capitalist|capitalist]] on steroids. A wealthy businessman and his employees are the antagonists for doing their job. One of them gets attacked by a raccoon. In the end, the main character, a real estate developer, is forced to change his job after &amp;quot;learning the animals' stories,&amp;quot; and he even puts up a poster stating that anyone who violates forest preservation laws will be fined $1,000,000.00. However, the film is also pro-family, as well as taking a jab at LGBT, with a joke of the protagonist being forced to wear his wife's clothes after the animals steal his, this is played for laughs and is clearly anti-[[cross dressing]]. (Though they are wearing again in the end credits).   &lt;br /&gt;
|$35,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ghost''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The [[Bible]] claims ghosts don't exist. Still, this film toys with the idea that they do, and it has a liberal actress, Whoopi Goldberg, as a psychic medium. Nevertheless, the film does show Christian values, as the ghost Sam Wheat tries to uncover a bank fraud case by convincing Goldberg to give the money to a Christian charity. It also has an anti-infidelity message, as despite being widowed, Sam's wife Molly still refuses to be with anyone else, even when his false friend Carl tries to hit on her. Also it isn't PC on [[Eternal damnation|damnation]], as the villains are seen being cared away helplessly by evil spirits after they die.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$217,631,306&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Good Kill''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Ethan Hawke plays a man who questions the ethics of his job as a drone pilot, while it is taking a jab at the [[Barack Obama]] regime (Obama has droned more people in the Middle East than George W. Bush, most of whom were innocent bystanders, and the left has ignored it or claimed it was a &amp;quot;Fox News conspiracy&amp;quot;). It could also be against the War on Terror too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$316,472&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Grave of the Fireflies''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|While the film has been labeled anti-war, the director Isao Takahata stated the actual meaning was about growing up. The film's message is still debatable to this day.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Growing up Brady]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on Barry Williams’ 1992 autobiography of the same name, it tells the story of Barry Williams playing Greg Brady on ''The Brady Bunch,'' along with Williams doing questionable stuff such as smoking weed and getting co-star Maureen McCormick to do it, along with taking TV mom Florence Henderson on a date after he initially striking out with McCormick, and shows that Mike Lookinland wanting to make out with Susan Olsen as funny. It also covers Robert Reed’s feud with series creator and executive producer [[Sherwood Schwartz]] over the show’s incredibly cheesy tone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It doesn’t condemn Robert Reed’s homosexuality, and shows that Mike Lookinland wanting to make out with Susan Olsen as funny.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A (TV Movie) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Halloween III: Season of the Witch''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Unlike the two films before it (which has mass murder Michael Myers) this film's villain is a pagan who plans on sacrificing children via witchcraft to bring back the original celebration of Halloween. However, he does this by selling masks to them which many critics pointed out may have been an anti-capitalism message.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/1982/10/22/movies/haloween-iii-plotting-a-joke.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film's &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot; is also an adulterer.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,400,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hansel &amp;amp; Gretel: Witch Hunters''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Western fairy tale characters Hansel and Gretel are now adults and have their own private bounty hunting organization in hunting witches. Portrays witchcraft in a negative manner, and guns in good light. But the gore, graphic violence and brief nudity is rather unnecessary.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$55,703,475 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Harry and the Hendersons''&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Should be PG-13 for multiple uses of the dreaded S-word in profanity.&lt;br /&gt;
|$49 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''High Noon''&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|A favorite of both Presidents [[Dwight Eisenhower]] and [[Bill Clinton]]; [[John Wayne]] said it was &amp;quot;the most un-American thing I've ever seen in my whole life&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/highnoon.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though susceptible of various interpretations, most of all it seems to scare people into wanting more government.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,750,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hoot''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmentalist movie about a bunch of kids who stand up to a CEO company that is trying to put one of its restaurants on a burrowing owl habitat. However, despite a businessman being the main villain, it doesn't condemn capitalism as a whole, since it doesn't portray the company in a negative light. The protagonists clearly have nothing against the business itself; even the main character states, &amp;quot;A pancake house would be great.&amp;quot; It also shows a police officer in a positive light. Overall, the movie contains many morals, including friendship, and it gives kids great inspiration to stand up for what they believe is right. &lt;br /&gt;
|$8,117,637&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Horrible Bosses 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sequel to ''Horrible Bosses''. Though this film could be argued to actually support the American Dream and capitalism, which its processor clearly did not.&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,445,357&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1996 film)|The Hunchback of Notre Dame]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Released during Michael Eisner's presidency at Disney, the film presents a mixed package. The original source material was not intended for children, yet the Disney film was marketed to young audiences as such.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases, the film manages to be slightly more pro-Christian than its source material. For example, the character of Frollo, who was the corrupt archdeacon in the novel, is now the minister of justice, and the Archdeacon is now a separate character voiced by Davis Odegn Steirs, who serves as the positive Christian conscience in the film (albeit the only positive Christian conscience). The Archdeacon is the one responsible for saving Quasimodo from Frollo committing infanticide and encourages Esmeralda to pray to God. Phoebus is also depicted in a good light, as an honorable soldier, and also shown to genuinely love Esmeralda, even going as far as to save her as well as Quasimodo. This is a stark contrast to the book, where he was a callous womanizer who abandoned Esmeralda to be hanged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christian imagery is present throughout the film, which is appropriate since Notre Dame is an actual location, unlike several Disney films set during the Renaissance, where churches are absent of religious imagery to be more politically correct. The Latin Requiem Mass is also present in the musical score.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most films in the Disney animated canon, this film actually has the characters relying on God's grace to resolve the conflict rather than on some special magic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, in some cases, the film actually manages to be even darker than the original novel. Originally, Quasimodo's vicious punishment at the hands of the Parisians during the Feast of Fools ceremony was not corporal punishment; in the Disney film, it was done at the Parisians' whim, just for the sake of it. In addition, Frollo himself was also made significantly more villainous in the movie compared to in the book despite being separated from the archdeacon role, removing most of his redeemable traits in the book (case in point, in the film, Frollo was responsible for killing Quasimodo's mother and nearly killed Quasimodo himself as a baby until being made to raise him as penance by the archdeacon, and was depicted as an abusive father figure overall, as well as depicted as sadistic, in contrast to the original novel, where he willingly took in Quasimodo when he was in fact abandoned by his mom and was depicted as a fairly good father figure, at least until Esmerelda entered the picture). Some Christian concepts were also removed from the film in an attempt to heighten Frollo's villainy (for example, Quasimodo in the film was named as an insult to his deformed appearance, whereas in the book he was actually named after Quasimodo Tuesday). It's also debatable whether it's pro-Christian overall, since while the Archdeacon himself was a positive influence, most of the other Christian characters, without even counting Frollo, were depicted in a very negative light. The director's commentary also implied that they may have included blasphemous material by depicting Frollo in a crucifix pose as he descends into Hell during the Hellfire visuals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;DVD Commentary: &amp;quot;Here's some more of our ham-fisted symbolism--Frollo falls down in the shape of a crucifix!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film, however, shows a clear case of divine punishment in animation, represented by the death of Frollo, literally seeing the Devil in the face, before falling to his horrible death into the &amp;quot;fiery pit&amp;quot;. Also pretty ironic, considering that his last words a few instants before his death were &amp;quot;And he shall smite the wicked, and plunge them into the fiery pit!&amp;quot;, when he was going to kill Esmeralda and Quasimodo with his sword.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To make the film even darker, a gypsy genocide plot is introduced, and Paris is also the victim of arson late into the film. The song 'Hellfire' was also notorious for making explicit references to lust. Not necessarily a bad or negative thing, it can be considered courageous, original, surprising, and entertaining artistically speaking, and for families with kids who are not &amp;quot;snowflakes&amp;quot;. However, this is in stark contrast to most other Disney film adaptations, which have a history of toning down the original works (as in ''[[The Jungle Book]]'', where Disney advised the writers to ignore the book specifically because its contents were unsuitable for children). However, on the other hand, other films from the Walt's era were more dark with particular horror and dramatic elements than their original counterparts and source materials, like ''[[Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs]]'', ''[[Pinocchio]]'' (with evil and sadistic Stromboli unlike his novel countepart Mangiafuoco, the demonic and sa distici Coachman and all the cursed Pleasure Island with the impressive children turning into donkeys scene, and the terrifying whale Monstro), all the ''[[Night on Bald Mountain]]'' segment in ''[[Fantasia]]'' (with Chernabog and even harpies showing bare breasts, though for a few seconds), ''[[Dumbo]]'' (with its Pink Elephants on Parade allucination caused by accidental consumption of alcohol), ''[[Bambi]]'' (for the (in)famous scene of the death of Bambi's mother), ''[[Sleeping Beauty]]'' and ''[[101 Dalmatians]]'', this latter two specifically for their villains' scenes (Maleficent and Cruella De Vil). The Gypsies were also depicted in a more positive light, to the extent that they, at times, were considered preferable to Christianity, despite Gypsies essentially being pagans. Hints at race swapping were also included in the film, as Esmerelda was made into an ethnic gypsy in the movie, when in the original book, she was actually a blonde Parisienne and the daughter of an anchoress who was abducted by the gypsies and made into their own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Worst of all, one of the male gargoyles falls in love with Djali, who is male according to some descriptions (voiced, however, by a female voice-actress and fans mostly refer to it as a female goat, and probably the gargoyle confused Djali with a female goat, assumption supported by his known clear stupidity), which may have meant that liberals will subtly shoehorn the homosexual agenda into anything, even the gargoyles of Notre Dame (and also comes across as extremely hypocritical and blasphemous due to homosexuality being tolerated even less by God than Frollo's lust for Esmerelda, based on God explicitly referring to the concept as an abomination in Leviticus as well as his destroying Sodom and Gomorrah largely because of the practice of homosexuality). However, this should be taken with a grain of salt, because the DVD audio commentary Kirk Wise (co-director), Gary Trousdale (co-director), and Don Hahn (producer) suggest that it's possible that the three gargoyles exist purely in Quasimodo's mind and are in fact split-off portions of his own personality created to deal with his loneliness. This doesn't explain, however, their scenes when Quasimodo is absent, how animals (especially Esmeralda's goat) can see them alive, the damage thev do to Frollo's soldiers in the climax, and their constant change of positions when they stop animating themselves.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; '''Gary Trousdale:''' We've always operated under the assumption that the gargoyles were kind of figments of Quasimodo's imagination. They didn't really move around, or did they? You know...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Kirk Wise:''' Yeah, we like leaving a little bit of a question mark; kind of like Harvey the rabbit or Calvin and Hobbes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Gary Trousdale:''' They're inanimate when anybody else comes in the room. They don't talk to anybody else, except the goat. So that's here we kind of crossed the line a little bit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Kirk Wise:''' We like to keep it a little bit iffy. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. So this matter could have less to do with the liberal agenda and more to do with poor writing. On a positive note, it is to be noted that the directors admitted that the implication that Hugo lusted after Djali was a line that even the directors admitted they shouldn't have crossed, which is a rarity ''especially'' in today's media where they are all for crossing said line.&lt;br /&gt;
|$100,138,851   &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Hunger Games]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Futuristic totalitarians plan titular annual televised &amp;quot;games&amp;quot; as punishment for the descendants of failed revolutionaries from a past uprising. Although technically a message against totalitarianism and for individualism, Leftist actor Donald Sutherland, who played President Snow, implied that the struggles of the films' protagonists were supposed to be derived from the Occupy Wall Street movement, and the book's author also indicated that the events of the book were based on the George W. Bush administration.&lt;br /&gt;
|$406,267,858&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Although the film does depict the Communists as bad guys (to such an extent that the Russian Communist Party in Moscow was angered by the decision), and implies that Indiana Jones is a Republican or at the very least an [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] fan, the film also depicts McCarthyism in a negative light, with one character implying that the American Government was simply being paranoid and denies there being a sizeable Communist infiltration in America.&lt;br /&gt;
|$786.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Iron Giant''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animation espouses anti-war themes and also brief but strong anti-hunting sentiments. Firearms in general are shown in a negative light, with the phrase &amp;quot;guns kill&amp;quot; being repeated a total of three times. The titular giant is called a &amp;quot;big gun that walks.&amp;quot; From a conservative viewpoint, he is a poor metaphor for a real gun; unlike a law-abiding citizen who is a gun owner, the giant has no choice in his actions because he is a war machine programmed with the inability to use his weapons for good, but only to use them thoughtlessly and senselessly. The story involves him learning to hide his weapons and &amp;quot;not be a gun&amp;quot;. The conclusion is that, in order to protect the public from an incoming missile, he must fly into it and kill himself rather than use his guns against it. As it is explained, &amp;quot;It's bad to kill, but it isn't bad to die.&amp;quot; In addition, despite being set during the Cold War, it largely downplays the Soviet menace that was occurring during that time, as the main antagonist, Kent Mansley, is a government agent (implied to be part of the NSA) investigating the titular Iron Giant who at one point while launching a tirade against Hogarth Hughes alludes to the possibility that the Communists may have been responsible for the Giant's creation as a means to destroy America and that they must destroy it before &amp;quot;it destroys us&amp;quot; and is treated negatively for it. Also features some foul language.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That all being said, however, despite the definite anti-gun and anti-hunting themes, the film does portray the military in a fairly positive light, as General Rogarth was shown to be even-headed and only willing to use military force if confronted with evidence requiring for it, also making clear that he was not happy about bringing out an implied large military force for what was apparently a hoax, and while the military does try to attack the Iron Giant late into the film, it was only because they had been manipulated into doing so by Kent Mansley by the latter lying about the giant killing Hogarth Hughes, and only when confronted with evidence that Hogarth had in fact been alive did the military stand down. In addition, when Hogarth left to investigate evidence of a &amp;quot;martian&amp;quot; taking out an antenna, he saluted a photograph of his father, who was implied to have died during World War II. Also features a positive portrayal of the American icon Superman. There's also an anti-materialist message, as well as an implicitly Christian one, as Hogarth talks to the Giant about how humans and other forms of life possess souls that live on even after their mortal bodies die.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,732,614&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Iron Lady''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The British biopic of [[Conservative Party]] leader and 1979-90 [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|British Prime Minister]], Margaret Thatcher, showing the effects of conservative economic policy on Britain and helping to lift the country out of its recession. However, it also showed Margaret Thatcher in a somewhat negative light, depicting her in her later years as slightly addled.&lt;br /&gt;
|$80,554,188 (international including UK), $27,081,674 (US - domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|It promotes the concept of self-worth and individualism ultimately, and that choices do in fact matter and have consequences, and ultimately promotes faith to a certain extent. However, it also falsely teaches that humanism is what makes life worthwhile; marginalizes [[faith]] with a cartoonish depiction and demonizes capitalism as sadistic and greedy.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,300,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jaws''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-environmentalism film, the heroes are police chief Brody, WWII vet Quint, and Marine Biologist Hooper, who team up to take on a monstrous, man-eating great white shark. However, there is a part where (despite the warning) the Mayor keeps the beaches open for the sake of money, which some may say is an anti-capitalist statement. Notable for being one of the first summer blockbusters. It was followed by three sequels in 1978, 1983 and 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
|$260,000,000&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=jaws.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Juno''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A pregnant teenage woman rejects [[abortion]] and decides for an adoptive birth instead. This movie pushes [[feminism]] and marginalizes the essential role of fatherhood.&lt;br /&gt;
|$143,492,840&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jurassic World''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Jurassic Park is now functioning and open for business, and the new boss is a woman, an obvious feminist message. Also the military is downgraded as they plan to weaponize dinosaurs. Despite all this, feminists weren't impressed and labeled it sexist&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/06/10/jurassic-world-a-big-dumb-sexist-mess.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and even liberal critics called the weaponizing dinosaurs plot asinine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thoughtcatalog.com/olos-nah/2015/06/ill-just-say-what-everyone-is-thinking-jurassic-world-is-terrible/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$652,270,625&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kiki's Delivery Service''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The film does show the value of hard work and is pro-capitalism (Kiki owns her own delivery business), but it also depicts feminism and witchcraft in a positive light. &lt;br /&gt;
|$18 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingdom of Heaven'' (director's cut)&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A story set in the Crusades period about a young knight. While the theatrical version was purely liberal media, the director's cut promotes fighting, honor, and duty, and portrays the noble Knights Hospitallers in a positive light. That being said, the movie still portrays the Knights Templar in a negative light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47,398,413&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingsman: The Secret Service''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-environmentalist, the villain attempts to eradicate the human race because of his belief in man-made global warming. Though the film is full of language and violence as well as a brief nudity scene. There's also one scene were one of the characters gets into a bloody fight with a group of Christians whom are portrayed as &amp;quot;racists&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$128,261,724&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Knocked Up''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Unemployed, immature and childish 23-year old Ben Stone (Seth Rogen) has a one-night stand with serious career woman Alison Scott (Katherine Heigl), with the unintended consequence of pregnancy. Alison's mother (Joanna Kerns) says she should get the pregnancy &amp;quot;[[abortion|taken care of]]&amp;quot;, while Ben's best friend Jonah (Jonah Hill) suggests that &amp;quot;I won't say the A-word, but it rhymes with abortion.&amp;quot; Alison decides to keep the child, while Ben decides to find a real job, grow up, and become a father.&lt;br /&gt;
|$148,768,917&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Lady and the Tramp]]'' (live-action remake)&lt;br /&gt;
|2019&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it contains the chivalry and capitalist themes from the original animated film. This both race and gender swapped live-action remake of the timeless animated classic of the same name shows the Democrat Jim Crow South of the early 1900s as a delusional and misleading multiethnic and multicultural paradise, with also totally legal interracial marriages. Compared to the animated counterparts, the animal characters are soulless, inexpressive, and unbearable if not even creepy to watch when they &amp;quot;talk&amp;quot;. Jim Dear, white here like in the source material, is legally married to Darling but here changed to a black American woman and with a black-mixed daughter named Lulu instead of a son named Jim, Jr.. Even Aunt Sarah is cast in black in this live-action version, and she loses the redeeming qualities she had in the original animated film. The neighbor dog and dear Lady's friend Jock is female here, while the antagonistic and mischievous Aunt Sarah's iconic female Siamese cats, Si &amp;amp; Am, are now two male Devon Rex cats named Devon &amp;amp; Rex, with a totally different and much less memorable musical number. The rat, &amp;quot;Herman&amp;quot;, is still the main villain and antagonist, but far less intimidating and scary-looking than the animated counterpart, and despite his musical theme being memorable, the same cannot be said for the final fight scene when compared to the animated version.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Legally Blonde''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A pro-feminist musical that also promotes every aspect of the &amp;quot;valley girl&amp;quot; lifestyle. Smart people (such as those who go to law school) are described as &amp;quot;boring, ugly, serious people&amp;quot; by the father of Elle Woods (the film's protagonist). It also contains hidden demeaning remarks about dark-haired people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said, however, it does have an anti-LGBT agenda message as well, as two characters who were LGBT, Enrique Salvatore and Enid Wexlin, are depicted in an extremely negative light, as the former was discovered to have been committing perjury against the defendant by inferring that she slept with him for three months as part of an attempt to frame her for murder (with his &amp;quot;boyfriend&amp;quot; Chuck being implied to be party to the attempted perjury up until Enrique attempted to lie about his relationship to him), and the latter was depicted as an obnoxious individual who pushes radical feminism (including trying to change &amp;quot;semester&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;ovester&amp;quot; due to thinking semester meant &amp;quot;semen&amp;quot;), and eventually gets called out upon later in the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$96,520,674 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Legend of Frosty the Snowman''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Although this film is a bastardization of the original  [[Frosty the Snowman]] special in which it retcons almost everything to push an anti-comformity message and presents youth rebellion in a positive light. It does have a very strong message of honor thy father. The villain also attacks [[imagination]], after he becomes a corrupt politician. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The LEGO Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Large Government, with a message that anyone has the potential to be extraordinary. However is also anti-capitalist, and the main villain is Lord Business.&lt;br /&gt;
|$257,760,692&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lincoln''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Bio film on conservative icon [[Abraham Lincoln]], played wonderfully by Daniel Day-Lewis. Although overall very positive towards Lincoln and the Republican Party, it nonetheless downplays the role the Democrat Party played in the institution of slavery during the Civil War.&lt;br /&gt;
|$182,207,973&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|''Lionheart''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-family as Jean-Claude Van Damme plays Lyon Gaultier (nicknamed Lionheart) who becomes a street fighter to help pay his sister-in-law's expenses after her husband is killed. During this time he also tries to reconnect with his estranged family. However he gets into the country illegally, which some could point out is a pro-illegal immigration statement. &lt;br /&gt;
|$24,078,196&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lorax''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it has an environmentalist agenda, it also states that monopolies are wrong.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$214,030,500 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mulan''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The film has Liberals changing history to suit their feminist agenda, similar to what they did in Pocahontas, as well as some historical revisionism (In the film, the Huns are at war with China, even though this never happened, although that said, the name of the villain, Shan Yu, hints at them being Xiongnu). However, the central theme of [[Filial piety]] from the work it was based on, [[The Ballad of Mulan]], is still present ultimately, as the main reason Mulan joined the military was that her father suffered a severe injury that made him unfit for combat, and the film is pro-Military.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,620,254 	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Mufasa: The Lion King''&lt;br /&gt;
|2024&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This prequel to 2019's ''The Lion King'' shows Mufasa's origin story, as Rafiki tells this to Simba's daughter Kiara. Mufasa is an orphaned lion cub who befriends another cub named Taka, who later becomes Scar. When a white lion named Kiros attacks their home, the brothers flee and make a journey towards a promised land called Milele, which would later be called the Pride Lands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On one hand, it does show a hint of feminism throughout the movie. Lionesses in real life are known to do most of the hunting for the pride, but the movie seems to hold them in higher favor than the males. Taka's father, Obasi, even gives his son terrible advice on how to be a king, such as being lazy and lying to his subjects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, the movie does portray family and friendship rather positively. Mufasa and Taka bond as brothers, and Taka's mother, Eshe, comes to care for Mufasa like another son. In the present, Simba is shown to be a good father to Kiara, telling her to be brave while he checks on Nala, who is giving birth to her second cub.&lt;br /&gt;
|$&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''P.C.U.''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|College students fight back against a campus where the administration promotes official [[diversity]] awareness weekends and radical [[feminism]], [[vegan]]ism, and [[political correctness]] run amok, but a conservative group on campus is also portrayed just as negatively as the P.C. groups.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,350,774&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Passion of the Christ]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Downplays the [[Resurrection]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original version of the film had no references at all to the Resurrection.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and strength of Christianity and omits powerful angels; instead exaggerates triumph of evil; film had little lasting effect on public or its producer; portrayed nails as through the hands rather than through the wrists as depicted by the [[Shroud of Turin]] and confirmed by modern science.&lt;br /&gt;
|$370,782,930&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pillow Talk''&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|A classic starring Rock Hudson and Doris Day in which conservative values triumph over liberal ones.  There are no distortions by feminist ideology.  Indeed, in one scene a leading man slaps the leading lady, but then is beaten up by dimwitted bystanders for it!&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,750,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''[[Pollyanna (1960 film)|Pollyanna]]''&lt;br /&gt;
| 1960&lt;br /&gt;
| G&lt;br /&gt;
| One of [[Walt Disney]]’s live-action classics stars an orphaned girl who now lives with her wealthy aunt Polly Harrington who is the de facto leader of the town (Harrington) due to her massive wealth and influence over the Church. Pollyanna herself helps the miserable and depressed find happiness again wether it’s the “glad game” or doing simple stuff to make rainbows with crystals. It promotes the idea of small town Americana, and social values with going to Church, and praying before eating. It also shows the town getting together to hold a bazar (hosted by the Church) to raise money for a new orphanage. That being said, the film opens with a nude boy swinging on a rope into a water hole.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,750,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Princess and the Frog''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals praised this film for featuring Disney's first African American princess but ignored the fact that it insults Christianity with Louisiana Voodoo, even replacing the traditional role of the fairy godmother with a blind voodoo priestess. On top of that, ''The Princess and the Frog'' is said to have stolen much of its plot from the film ''[[The Little Mermaid]]'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://crowdofstars.livejournal.com/14186.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; That being said, however, it does depict traditional femininity in a positive light in the form of the side character Charlotte LeBoeuf, and is the first Disney animated feature film to have a positive depiction of traditional marriage since ''[[The Little Mermaid]]'' two decades prior. It's also debatable as to whether it promotes feminism, as aside from Charlotte LeBoeuf being depicted in a positive light overall as noted above, it implies at one point that Tiana achieving her dreams of being a CEO is ultimately a negative due to the main villain Dr. Facilier using that to tempt her into aiding him.&lt;br /&gt;
|$104,400,899&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pulp Fiction''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite saying the F-word in almost every sentence, the film (surprisingly) has a pro-Christian message as after being shot at, every bullet misses mob hit men Jules Winnfield and Vincent Vega. Winnfield believes it was a divine intervention and message from God to stop his life of crime. His partner doesn't believe this but it's later proven to be true as he perished later on in the movie. Also has sadomasochistic homosexuals as the bad guys. And (sort of) has an anti-drug message as mob boss's girlfriend Mia Wallace is seen also overdosing (a negative side to drugs) on heroin.&lt;br /&gt;
|$107,928,762 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Quick and the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A feminist  revisionist western. However strong message about honoring thy father. As the [[protagonist]] was led to justify the murder of her father, that she encountered as a little girl.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,636,537	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Rescuers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The villain in this movie is a capitalist pawn shop owner, who wants a rare diamond to make her rich, to add insult to injury they're Southerners. Also paints the United Nations in a positive light. On the other hand, the main villain is also a feminist, and the main human protagonist is shown praying for not only herself (even she has been kidnapped) but for all the kids in the orphanage (who have not been kidnapped). This is one of the by now rare Disney films feature a [[Christian]] character that's treated in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$29 million  	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Robin Hood''&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Animated Disney adaptation of the iconic story, depicting all of the characters as anthropomorphic animals. Although the story itself was based on [[Joseph Ritson]]'s revised version of the character that was in support of the Jacobin cause and thus was a liberal icon (steals from the rich, gives to the poor), the villain is Prince John who makes his money from taxes, suggesting Robin Hood is only giving money the government demanded back to people who actually worked for it. It also features a condemnation of government encroachment of the church, as a pivotal scene featured the Sheriff of Nottingham explicitly stealing a coin from the poor box and his later arresting Friar Tuck for trying to stop him, and the Sheriff's actions were clearly being framed in a horrible light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Rogue One: A Star Wars Story]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A group of freedom fighters undertake a dangerous mission in an attempt to steal the plans for the Galactic Empire's ultimate weapon, the Death Star. Unlike the previous Star Wars films, the focus of this one is on soldiers on the battlefield, their goal to restore liberty to the Galaxy. This gives the movie a strong feeling of American patriotism, and could also be argued to show respect to the U.S. military. However, the screenwriters Chris Weitz and Gary Whitta made tweets that implied that they were trying to push the leftist Diversity agenda just after Trump won the presidency, as well as used a customized version of the Rebel Starbird logo with a safety pin attached, and one of the main characters, Saw Gerrera, was stated to be based on Marxist revolutionary [[Che Guevara]] and was treated in a (comparably) positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,043,133,586&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Saw''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004-2010, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R (Director's Cuts are NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|The franchise contains an anti-nihilist message, with the antagonist, John Kramer, also known as &amp;quot;the Jigsaw Killer,&amp;quot; wishing for his victims to survive the &amp;quot;games&amp;quot; in which he places them, ultimately emerging with a better appreciation for their lives. For example, ''Saw'' condemns the adultery committed by Dr. Lawrence Gordon. ''Saw III'' focuses on the value of forgiveness, John having Jeff Denlon complete three tests involving the three people whom he blamed for the death of his young son. ''Saw IV'' contains a very strong message of letting go and letting people find salvation and redemption for themselves, an allusion to biblical passages about the subject. However, it could also be argued that Jigsaw is playing God with the value of human life, by bringing his test subjects to the very edge of death, forcing them to gravely hurt themselves, in order to survive. Furthermore, in ''Saw III'', one of his apprentices, Amanda Young, is revealed to have rigged traps to kill her victims, even if they successfully complete their games, as she no longer believes in Jigsaw's philosophy. However, John is shown clearly shown to be disgusted by Amanda's actions, though nevertheless trying to guide her to redemption, or at least his version of it. Other condemnations of nihilism include the clearly sociopathic depiction of corrupt Detective Mark Hoffman, the most important of Jigsaw's apprentices, as he, like Amanda, strays from John's philosophy and simply rigs traps to murder his victims, while also carrying out the games that John had planned before his death at the end of ''Saw III.''&lt;br /&gt;
|$953,421,276&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shame''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|While the movie shows [[Hollywood Values]], such as sex addiction, in a negative light and is clearly anti-[[homosexual agenda]], as the main character reaches his lowest point by partaking in such acts, the film is graphic in its nature leaving one to question how conservative it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,909,002 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Shark Tale]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes multiculturalism and the deuteragonist of the film is a great white shark who is a vegetarian. Besides for being pro-vegan it is also a metaphor for being homosexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gaylife.about.com/od/moviestheatre/a/sharktale.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However the film also has a strong pro-integrity message, where Oscar realized in the end he was wrong to lie to get to the top, and forsakes all the wealth he has acquired through his dishonesty. &lt;br /&gt;
|$160,861,908&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Simpsons]] Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This feature based upon the long-running animated sitcom portrays the liberal [[Environmental Protection Agency|EPA]] as a villainous and devious agency and the government in general as intrusive and corrupt. On the other hand, it celebrates [[environmentalism]] in the beginning, and Homer scoffs at people in Church for praying to &amp;quot;their phony-baloney God&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$183,135,014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Soul Man''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A white student cheats the [[affirmative action]] system, by pretending to be black in order to get the scholarship he needs for to pay for Harvard. Towards the end, it is revealed he took the scholarship away from someone who needed it  as well (and is really black) because she has a son and is divorced at such a young age. The movie portyals the police as racist, and blames racism on many things, and seems to support the need for affirmative action. But on a conservative note, the film teaches the importance of hard work, and is also politically incorrect. &lt;br /&gt;
|$27,820,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Star Wars]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977-1983 (Original Trilogy); 1999-2005 (Prequel Trilogy); 2015-2019 (Sequel Trilogy)&lt;br /&gt;
|PG, PG-13 (Episode III &amp;amp; Episodes VII-IX)&lt;br /&gt;
|The well-known space opera series is mostly composed of simple truths about the triumph of good over evil, and in the case of ''Episode VI: Return of the Jedi'', redemption. However, ''Episode VI'' also contained some implied pro-[[Vietcong]] propaganda at George Lucas' behest via the Ewoks, as well as his later claiming that the entirety of the ''Star Wars'' saga from ''Episodes IV''-''VI'' was meant to be his means of protesting Vietnam (which is supported by a memo dating back to 1973 where he claimed the film was about &amp;quot;A large technological empire going after a small group of freedom fighters.&amp;quot; It is also to be noted that this was not the first time he voiced support for the Vietcong as well as used film to push an anti-American/anti-War agenda, as he also initially played a role in the filming of ''Apocalypse Now''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nypost.com/2014/09/21/how-star-wars-was-secretly-george-lucas-protest-of-vietnam/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), and the re-release for ''Episode IV: A New Hope'' also had an infamous edit where it made it seem as though Greedo shot at Han first, with George Lucas later revealing he did the edit (or rather, falsely claimed it was always that way) as a means to promote gun control. Regarding the pro-Vietcong sentiment being pushed in ''Return of the Jedi'', former president [[Richard Nixon]] in his 1985 book ''No More Vietnams'' cited ''Return of the Jedi'' as ultimately one reason why America, at least by that time, had initially felt so guilty of their strength that they were unwilling to use it even to defend their freedom and that of others.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''No More Vietnams'' by Richard Nixon, 1985&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Chapter 1:&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;The assertion that our very bigness is badness has infested our culture to a surprising degree. The creator of the phenomenally successful Star Wars series recently explained that the climactic scene in one of his moves - in which the evil “Empire’s” giant war machines are destroyed by fuzzy little good guys with wooden bows and arrows - was inspired by the Vietnam experience. No matter that in Vietnam the Communist “good guys” packed Soviet automatic rifles and, in 1975, rode state-of-the-art Russian tanks across the South Vietnamese border. The propaganda of disproportionate forces in Vietnam, the myth of small/good versus big/bad, did enough damage to help lose the war for the United States and the people of South Vietnam. Today it is one symptom of the Vietnam syndrome to the extent that it makes Americans ashamed of their power, guilty about being strong, and forgetful about the need to be willing to use their power to protect their freedom and the freedom of others.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prequel trilogy also had some implied pot-shots at then-president George W. Bush and his War on Terror, and there was also an implied promotion of moral relativity in ''Revenge of the Sith'' (where Obi-Wan, when confronting Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader in the climax, stated in reply to Anakin's declaration that Obi-Wan is his enemy if he's not with him that &amp;quot;only a Sith deals in absolutes.&amp;quot;). A similar promotion of moral relativity and postmodernism was shown in ''Return of the Jedi'' where Obi-Wan admitted that his claim that Vader killed Anakin Skywalker was &amp;quot;true from a certain point of view,&amp;quot; as well as further elaborating his claim by stating that &amp;quot;[[Subjectivism|a great many of the truths we cling to depend greatly on our point of view.]]&amp;quot; The same movie's ending also carries an implicit promotion of cannibalism. In addition, the Trade Federation and its motives in ''The Phantom Menace'' was crafted by George Lucas to be a negative response to the Republican Revolution of 1994, and in particular Newt Gingrich's Contract with America (with Gingrich himself being a partial namesake of the main villain, Viceroy Nute Gunray). ''Attack of the Clones'' and to a lesser extent ''Revenge of the Sith'' also had very blatant anti-war themes and a very negative portrayal of the military, as a large part of the plot involved creating a military for the republic (and in the case of ''Revenge of the Sith'', the near end of the Clone Wars), with the narrative strongly implying that even forming a military at all was somehow a threat to freedom. To a lesser extent, the Prequel trilogy also has a negative depiction of family values, since it's implied that even holding attachments to family or trying to start a family leads directly to turning to the Dark Side, with Yoda even stating that such acted as &amp;quot;the shadow of greed.&amp;quot; Lucas, in an interview with Time Magazine, also made similar jabs on family when explaining Anakin's character arc and his eventually becoming Darth Vader, where he said &amp;quot;Because he [Anakin Skywalker] gets attached to things...He can't let go of his mother...his girlfriend...things. It makes you greedy. And when you're greedy, you are on the path to the dark side because you fear that you're going to lose things. You fear you're not going to have the power you need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20020923140712/http://cgi.theforce.net/theforce/tfn.cgi?storyID=15712&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the director for ''Episode VII: The Force Awakens'', [[J.J. Abrams]], admitted in a press release that he deliberately made Finn black in order to ensure diversity among the characters, hinting at it pushing the leftist [[diversity]] agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnet.com/news/director-j-j-abrams-weighs-in-on-diversity-in-the-star-wars-universe/?_escaped_fragment_=#!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Two audience members jointly asked Abrams whether -- given his track record of helping build a diverse cast as director of the &amp;quot;Star Trek&amp;quot; reboot films -- he could confirm if there will be more Asian characters in the Star Wars universe. Asian characters are few and far between in the Star Wars franchise -- one appears in the original trilogy's last film, ''Return of the Jedi'', but for only four seconds before dying in a fiery explosion. Abrams said that while he won't be casting future films in the franchise, because he's directing only ''Episode VII'', he did include Asian characters in ''The Force Awakens'', which opened December 18. &amp;quot;I think it's important people see themselves represented in film,&amp;quot; Abrams said. &amp;quot;I think it's not a small thing.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also, the film also hints at a militant [[feminist]] agenda by having Leia act as general and Rey not allowing anyone to save her, something that conservative commentator John Nolte mentioned was a [[detraction]] for the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/12/17/star-wars-the-force-awakens-review-j-j-abrams-repents-for-the-sins-of-george-lucas/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, the ending award ceremony in ''A New Hope'' was deliberately modeled after the stadium scene from the infamous Nazi movie propaganda ''The Triumph of the Will''. Ian McDiarmid, the actor who played the saga's main villain [[Emperor Palpatine]], had also implied in an interview with ''The Guardian'' around the time ''Revenge of the Sith'' was released that George Lucas had deliberately made the films for primarily eight-year olds specifically to indoctrinate them into Lucas' leftist view of the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2005/nov/07/theatre1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;He [McDiarmid] also bristles at the notion that the Star Wars films are totally hollow entertainments. &amp;quot;I remember when I sat there in the Evil Emperor's swivel chair and George [Lucas] said things like 'does it remind you of the Oval office?' And I realised that at that time Richard Nixon was in his mind.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;And I see that in the Guardian's review of the DVD - not favourable, of course - mention is made of the fact that there are lines that sound really contemporary. But the reviewer decided that was by chance: no, no, no, no. Entirely by design.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;George knew that eight-year-olds, for whom these films are primarily intended, are very impressionable, and he wanted to make the right impression. So the whole film is about the unnecessary rise of fascism. In other words: watch out, they're all after your freedom, particularly when they're talking about defending freedom. Without getting over-extended about it, that is at the heart of these movies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Star Wars Episode VIII: The Last Jedi]] also received strong criticism for its apparent 'SJW' bias&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Toto, Christian (December 19, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/19/last-jedi-critics-mostly-conservative/ As ‘Star Wars’ fans cheer, conservative film critics point out problems with ‘Last Jedi’]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved December 20, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is also speculated that the leftist POV pushing caused fans to boycott the 2018 film [[Solo: A Star Wars Story]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.express.co.uk/entertainment/films/967205/Star-Wars-Han-Solo-FLOP-Last-Jedi-fan-BACKLASH-boycott-box-office-cast-sequel-cameo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; J.J. Abrams also heavily implied that the then-in-development final episode ''The Rise of Skywalker'' will feature homosexuals as part of &amp;quot;representation&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://variety.com/2019/film/news/star-wars-finn-poe-not-boyfriends-lgbtq-representation-1203423286/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which was ultimately confirmed in pre-release screenings, where two members of the Resistance, both female, engaged in an on-screen kiss while celebrating a major victory against the First Order.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/star-wars-rise-skywalker-features-franchise-s-first-same-sex-kiss-1263256&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$460,998,007&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Starship Troopers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it overall depicts the Military in a protagonistic light and arguably is pro-war and pro-military, the director of the film, Paul Verhoeven, implied it was actually supposed to push an anti-military, anti-war message where it implied that America during the Cold War were automatically fascists simply because they are entering war, and specifically stated it was &amp;quot;a natural evolution for post-World War II America.&amp;quot; In addition, to reinforce Verhoeven's message, he deliberately modeled various scenes after ''Triumph of the Will'' and other pro-Nazi propaganda scenes, as well as modeled the protagonists' uniforms after the uniforms utilized by the Nazis (i.e., the character Carl, played by Neil Patrick Harris, wearing a uniform that was modeled after the [[SS]]). When asked by Michael Ironside, who was one of the people who had a role in the movie and had read the original book, about why he made the movie despite Verhoeven's leftist politics, he answered &amp;quot;If I tell the world that a right-wing, fascist way of doing things doesn't work, no one will listen to me. So I'm going to make a perfect fascist world: everyone is beautiful, everything is shiny, everything has big guns and fancy ships, but it's only good for killing ******* bugs!&amp;quot; (note that fascism is not &amp;quot;right wing&amp;quot;, it is left wing, so Verhoeven's incorrect regarding which wing the Nazis/fascists were part of).&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,814,377 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sudden Death''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgraced fire fighter now becomes a laughingstock fire marshal uncovers a terrorist plot at a Hockey game plans to redeem himself and protect his children and the Vice President from said terrorists. However, they're not Islamic, which may have been because the film was trying to be politically correct.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,350,171 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Super''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A short-order cook becomes a superhero after a vision from God. He frequently turns to prayer and a Christian television show for guidance. Even though his wife leaves him for a drug dealer, he remains loyal to her for the whole picture.  At the same time, foul language, violence, and brief nudity scenes are included.&lt;br /&gt;
|$327,716 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Team America: World Police''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|While it is clearly pro-military, pro-America, and anti-Hollywood, the movie is riddled with liberal values, including toilet humor and vulgar language throughout.  The movie's foul-mouthed theme song favors abortion, slavery, pornography, and Democrats, while having no positive reaction to Republicans, which makes sense because the screenplay was written by the creators of ''[[South Park]]'' and ''The Book of Mormon''.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32,786,074&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Terminator''&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|R &lt;br /&gt;
|Takes the side of humanity in this man vs machine battle, and the protagonist Sarah Connor is depicted in a traditionally feminine manner. However, it is anti-war, anti-Capitalist and comes from liberal atheist James Cameron, in which he imagines the military being the cause of the downfall of man.&lt;br /&gt;
|$78.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Terminator 2: Judgement Day''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The second film in the Terminator Franchise by Liberal director James Cameron. While it does have anti-war and anti-capitalist themes, and also dabbles in pro-feminist views via Sarah Connor's change in overall character, it is also pro-family. John Connor reconnects with his mother and the Terminator who serves as his protector becomes like a father to him, so much so that John cries when the Terminator chooses to sacrifice himself to ensure that Skynet would never be built.&lt;br /&gt;
|$523.7 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Titanic]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Every life has value, and the most powerful men give up their seats on lifeboats to women and children first, while the media and a young [[RINO]] are rightly criticized. The film broke the record in movie revenues before the environmentalist nightmare that was ''Avatar''. However, ''Titanic'' gives some hints at a pro-socialist view, and a key scene involving Rose being drawn in the nude could be evocative of pornography.&lt;br /&gt;
|$600,779,824&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Toxic Avenger''&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Produced by liberal Lloyd Kaufman and his independent company Troma Entertainment, this film contains graphic violence, sex, nudity, and profanity. It also promotes environmentalism, with the fictional town of &amp;quot;Tromaville&amp;quot; called &amp;quot;the toxic waste dumping capital of the world&amp;quot; by the narrator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it also has messages of anti-bullying, anti-crime, and anti-corruption. The protagonist is Melvin Ferd, a scrawny guy who works as a janitor and the local gym and gets pushed around by a bully named Bozo. Bozo and his friends conspire to humiliate Melvin, which ends up with Melvin in a pink tutu and falling head first into a barrel of toxic waste. The chemicals mutate him into a large, deformed mutant with superhuman strength. Melvin, adopting the superhero name &amp;quot;Toxie&amp;quot; then goes around Tromaville fighting crime including: attacking a gang of thugs beating up a police officer who refuses to take a bribe, protecting a Mexican restaurant from an armed robbery and saving a young blind woman named Sara (who becomes Toxie's love interest) from being raped, and rescuing a 12-year-old prostitute from her evil pimp. Tromaville's leadership is shown to be extremely corrupt, with mayor Peter Belgoody who collaborates with the criminals, and the Chief of Police who is a literal Nazi, hinting at an anti-government corruption message. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Trainspotting]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It's been debatable if the film is anti-drug.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,491,080&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''U-571''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Had a plot which was based on the first capture of a [[German]] [[Enigma machine]] in [[World War Two]]. Despite the film being patriotic to America, the facts are wrong as the Enigma machine was captured by the [[British]] in 1941 prior to the Americans entering the war. &lt;br /&gt;
|$77,122,415&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Twilight Saga''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008-2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Starred by anti-military liberal [[Kristen Stewart]] and glorifies [[vampire|vampires]], but it also makes fun of [[public school culture]] and [[modernism]] while promoting [[abstinence]] until marriage, traditional courtship and marriage, and the [[pro-life]] movement. It was written by a [[Mormon]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,365,922,346&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Van Helsing'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Thanks to [[Hollywood values]], Van Helsing isn't portrayed as the Christian character he should be, but the film still gets its good vs. evil message across. As well as portraying the Catholic Church, and Christianity in a positive light. The director Stephen Sommers has made conservative films ''The Mummy Returns'' and ''G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra'' though.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,177,084&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=vanhelsing.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Wall-E''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie shows the dangers of big government (BNL), however it is also anti-capitalist and pro-environmentalism as BNL is a corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
|$223,808,164 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Way We Were''&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Unique in the way that it appears liberal to liberals while unintentionally sending a [[conservative]] message to young women. Stars uber-liberal [[Barbra Streisand]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$49,919,870&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''We're the Millers''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A drug dealer, stripper, runaway, and average loser pretend to be a family to sneak marijuana out of Mexico. However, they learn the value and importance of family. The villains of the movie are all drug gang men, the film also features a stripper scene, and whether or not the film is anti-drug in the end is debatable.&lt;br /&gt;
|$150,394,119&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Yours Mine and Ours''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The widower father of a conservative family marries a widowed mother of a liberal family. Their two difference lifestyles contradict with each other, and the film does not really decide whose lifestyle is better. On the one hand, at one point, the liberal children fool the conservative children into thinking there is a house fire, so they can have the bathrooms for themselves. On the other hand, the children work together in another scene and use conservative tactics to end bullying without the help of an authority figure. In the end, the children learn to put their differences aside and realize that family is what matters more.&lt;br /&gt;
|$53,412,862&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add more!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Worst Liberal Snubs]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Worst Liberal TV Shows]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cinema]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worst Liberal Movies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Worst Liberal Movies}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2199049</id>
		<title>User talk:Ed Poor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2199049"/>
		<updated>2026-07-10T03:55:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: /* Great to see you again, Ed! */ Great to BE BACK&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Archive: &lt;br /&gt;
[[/1|1]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/2|2]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/4|4]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/5|5]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/6|6]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/7|7]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/8|8]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/9|9]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/10|10]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/11|11]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/12|12]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/13|13]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/14|14]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/15|15]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/16|16]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/17|17]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/18|18]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ed poor grinning.jpg|right|thumb|114px|Ed Poor on campus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- New comments at the bottom, please. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writing Plan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to submit a writing plan. While I haven't been asked for one, I feel this would best help keep me on task and contribute the most productively. You seem to know an awful lot about this wiki stuff, and I'm still new at it, so if you could help me that would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
I think I'd first like to help contribute to the various book articles around the site by adding in examples of the influence of Christianity, as a lot of books have Christian overtones that aren't currently listed. I'm thinking I'd like to start by drawing parallels between the story of Jesus in the Gospels with One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Please let me know if this would be acceptable.--[[User:JeremiahJ|JeremiahJ]] 18:10, 6 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably not. Please email me a draft. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 17 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor, I have submitted a request [[Talk:Atheism#Addition_of_Information_on_Charity_and_External_Links_Request|here]] but it was never attended to. Could you please have a look at it? Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:19, 28 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Image Upload Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
I am new here. Can you upload these images please.&lt;br /&gt;
https://puresocialnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/PA-Reg-Trends-1024x576.png&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.wikispeedia.org/seth_keshel_photo_2021-07-11_17-39-09.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I create Seth_Keshel page, but today its gone. Not sure how to proceed.&lt;br /&gt;
-James Pruett&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed Poor, I hope this message finds you doing well. I was wondering if you could upload [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Young_Galaxy_Accreting_Material.jpg this image] for use in the article I recently created. I look forward to hearing your response. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:32, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello Ed Poor, could you please add [[Atheism and the suppression of science]] to [[Template:Nb Atheism|this template]]? I really appreciate it! With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:14, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hello Ed Poor, I need two more images for the article I created which are available [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Independent_assortment_%26_segregation.svg here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Lennox.jpg here]. Recently, [[User:JMR10]] uploaded my previous one, for which I am thankful. Could you ask him to do the same for these two or could you please do these for me? I highly appreciate it. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:40, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I seem to have messed up the Ada article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My proxy keeps dropping stuff, so the picture at the top is busted.  Also, I had to cut down the reference, because the captcha can't make it through.  It should have a left bracket, and h,t,t,p, etc., and a right bracket after the &amp;quot;pdf&amp;quot;. I wonder if you could please fix it for me.  I will contact Andy about getting my IP range restored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I was going to put in the talk page (and will do once things get straightened out) is that the two cited articles are very shallow, having only 7 and 3 sentences, respectively.  They both refer to a &amp;quot;plan&amp;quot;, but that's because the word &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been coined in the computer context.  She really was the first person to write &amp;quot;code&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry about this.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:08, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I read her notes, and it doesn't look like a [[computer program]] to me. A charitable view might be that it's a [[specification|spec]], but there's no flowchart and no [[source code]]. Don't be sorry, just get it right. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:21, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What did you expect this &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; to look like?  The term &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; implies both a programming language and &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot; that the source code is assembled or compiled into.  Assemblers, compilers, and programming languages wouldn't be invented for another hundred years (by Grace Murray Hopper, John Backus, and others.)  The same goes for the other accoutrements of modern software development, like flow charts and specifications.  In fact, even the terms &amp;quot;software&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been invented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, assuming that you accept that she had to write &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot;, what would you expect machine code to look like for a machine that reads its instructions with rods poking through holes in large punched cards running around on a track, and does its arithmetic by counting teeth on turning gears?  It wouldn't look much like Intel 586 code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact is, the lines of Ada's written algorithm were intended to be punched into lines of holes in Babbage's cards, once the &amp;quot;analytical engine&amp;quot; was built, which it wasn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, what I was being &amp;quot;sorry&amp;quot; for was not the content of my edit, but the fact that an extremely buggy proxy messed up the article and wouldn't let me fix it, despite several tries.  Andy has been working with me to fix the network problems, and DMorris fixed the broken picture and hyperlink while my access was broken.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 20:39, 6 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then it would be more accurate to say that she described an algorithm. That's not the same as a computer program, even if she was hoping that Babbage's machine might be programmed to carry out the algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An encyclopedia should be precise and unbiased, not used to create &amp;quot;factoids&amp;quot; for use in publicity campaigns, such as promoting [[women in science]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't say she had to write machine code, but rather to be the &amp;quot;first programmer&amp;quot; she would have had to produce a [[computer program]]. If you have seen it, please show it to me. Otherwise, I'm going to make an editorial decision that she produced an algorithm rather than a program. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:18, 7 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Let's say that [[Ada Lovelace]] wrote one of the first comprehensive descriptions of an algorithm to generate [[Bernoulli numbers]]. But until I see the actual sequence of instructions, including [[if-then]] or [[loop control]] statements, I'd hesitate to call it an actual [[computer program]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:17, 17 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The anti-Semitism of liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
I love how libs reveal their true selves.  No matter what we say or do in describing them, they come here just to confirm it all.  So when they want to emphasize &amp;quot;Jew&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;karajou&amp;quot;, I'll be more then happy to get a gold Magen David to wear around my neck, join my brothers and sisters in the synagogue every week, and show everyone else just how hate-filled and intolerant these liberals really are.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:20, 12 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please help! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! I tried to add the information for Edo to the Tokyo article and for some reason,. it stripped a bunch of stuff out when I saved. Now when I try and revert the edit I made, I keep getting a internal server 500 error. Please can you revert for me? [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:19, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's ok, I fixed it! [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:30, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm glad it worked out for you. My Japanese name is &amp;quot;Edo&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:04, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice speed on reverts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You beat me to every one! Nicely done--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:05, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. I'll pass that on to my secret bot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:10, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks for noticing me ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must be doing something right. Every time I mention alternate viewpoints, and no one sees fit to revert my edits, I get vandalism to my talk page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:48, 10 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jeb Bush ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm trying to reorganize the information, not leave it out. If you notice, I'm working on the article quite a bit. May I please revert your revision? [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:05, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sure. I'm frequently too bold and hasty. And that's the wonderful thing about a wiki. Nothing is ever really deleted; it's all in the article history. Go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:09, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technical question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm lobbying for a separate namespace for the Conservapedia Bible Project. The idea is that each verse gets its own ''article'', which can be used rather as a template. I see a couple of advantages:&lt;br /&gt;
*verses can be quoted more easily: instead of copying the whole verse, only a short link (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; ) is neccessary to get a neat result: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*thereby, the use of the CBP is encouraged over other translations.&lt;br /&gt;
*if there is a change in the CBP, the afflicted verses don't have to be tracked down manually, but the change is applied automatically throughout the wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To accomplish this, a new namespace has to be created. That shouldn't be too difficult, as there are only a few exemplary pages prefixed with ''CBP:'' at this moment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But after this, the namespace has to be filled with the existing translated verses. My question: is your bot up to this task?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 10:53, 8 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== madonna ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, please strongly reconsider your desire to create a &amp;quot;kinder article.&amp;quot; In stating that madonna is a person who has changed to being more spiritual you are buying to the liberal media's lies. It sounds like a madonna fan attempting to weave their bias in, which of course you are not. I think you may want to do more research, and read my recent additions as she is still, if not more so, a wicked and hateful person who has sucked millions of children into raunchy culture, dated murderers and mocked our Lord Jesus Christ who gave his life for us. Madonna deserves only the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:14, 14 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And I just had a long conversation with some Wikipedians in Central Park last month, about whether CP is more neutral than WP. Now you want &amp;quot;conservative bias&amp;quot; to denounce [[Madonna Ciccone]]? Not even Wikipedia's BLP policy would allow that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder whether you are a liberal '''tempting me''' to add bias, just so you can accuse us of being biased. Well, if so, I choose not to cooperate, my dear elf. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:45, 14 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Legolas here might be a parodist. Would you mind looking into him? [[User:NickP|NickP]] 00:12, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, your compassion sounds a little misplaced to me. Do you also visit the Fred Phelps, Bernie Madoff, Ted Bundy, and Charles Manson pages asking people for some &amp;quot;Christian charity&amp;quot; to tone those down too? Look into me all you want please. I dislike Madonna because she has mocked our lord Jesus Christ. Conservative people have respect for Christ end of story. The reason society has degraded is by giving raunchy people like madonna a free pass and pity. I'm the one who wants to print the ACTUAL history of madonna that the liberal media has left out such her dating the felon Chris Paciello. I only want the truth about her in the article. Why is that so bad? I thought this was the one place that might allow the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:34, 17 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ed, can you please look into this guy? He is an obvious parodist. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 15:55, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
First of all - Ed is a senior sysop at this site - I don't know why a few of you have taken upon yourself to post on [[User talk:Aschlafly|Andy's talk page]] when Ed is more than capable of dealing with an alleged parodist on his own. Secondly, just because he is posting radical things on a talk page does not make him a parodist. Looking at his contributions, you ''could'' argue that he is edit warring, but since Ed is simultaneously the user in the revert war and an admin, it is up to his judgement as to whether or not a block is deserving. Your collective alarmism has now spread across three talk pages. That's enough.--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 16:00, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::@NickP, your very.... quick to call somebody else a parodist. Why not leave that to the pro.'s to decide?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:06, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Several others have also pointed out the fact that he acts very suspicious. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:13, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Saying he &amp;quot;acts suspicious&amp;quot; and saying he's a 100% no way im wrong about this Parodist is two completely different things.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:16, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I prefer what Wikipedia old-timers used to call &amp;quot;soft security&amp;quot;. Just help me fix the articles in question. Everything will sort itself out. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:34, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==EdBot==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I left three (actually six) problem Categories that need some sort of merging at [[User_talk:EdBot]]. Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, EdBot did not survive the MediaWiki upgrades. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:21, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Does that mean it's all got to be done manually? Moving 200 entries into another Category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Only if they really have to be moved. (Meanwhile, if anyone has an idea how a bot can &amp;quot;log in&amp;quot; with the new MediaWiki software, let me know.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot#Logging_in This] should help. Indeed, the whole [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot page] is quite interesting. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:40, 19 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A request concerning recent events ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm very sorry to come to you with this, but I honestly don't know where else to turn at this point.  You have always struck me as the voice of reason and level-headedness here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply put: the current altercation on Andy's talk page is out of control.  I recognize that I have no authority to tell sysops what they should or shouldn't do, but it seems to me that basic common courtesy calls for not filling up Andy's talk page with arguments and accusations.  Moreover, the very public nature of the dispute is encouraging other users to join in.  Some of them are doubtless sincere; others, I suspect, may in fact be parodists seeking to fan the flames (I notice a LOT of recently created accounts.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless, the fact remains that Andy's talk page has been turned into a general forum for accusations and arguments.   At this point, it's degenerated to the level where people are making absolutely vicious personal attacks against certain of the participants.  (Kudos to JamesWilson for promptly reverting the most egregious of these.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know the other sysops better than most of us; you talk to them; I would certainly hope they trust and respect your opinion.  Is there anything you can do to persuade them to take a step back, cool down, and wait for Andy to respond at this point?  Everyone involved has made their positions clear; further acrimony can serve no useful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry to trouble you with this, but I really feel that this is both inconsiderate to Andy and deleterious to the Conservapedia project as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:05, 28 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the vote of confidence, but shouldn't I check with Andy before barging in? It may be that he prefers to let everyone air their opinions. It is not just his courage but his wisdom and compassion that attracted me to this project. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:59, 5 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[User:MRellek]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, per the site owner, Administrators [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Guidelines&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=892763 &amp;quot;instructions...are to be followed&amp;quot;] is no longer operable. I have emailed you a copy of Mr. Schlafly's approval.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, sorry. I was hasty. Feel free to unban MRellek, if you feel I was out of line. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, Ed. I'm trying to get the other sysops to do more warnings &amp;amp; shorter blocks; let's get a sense of community here. After all, we've known many of these editors (the RW neighbors) for several years now.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:37, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel. I invited someone to edit Conservapedia and they were blocked and they should not have been. I got the block overturned. So I think there is room for improvement in Conservapedia's blocking policy. You can sign up [[User:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. I invited active Syops/Admins plus people with blocking rights who might wish to be Sysops. If I left anyone out, please let them know about the panel.  The people with blocking rights can sign up [[User talk:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. The panel will probably convene when Iduan is back from his summer vacation or fairly soon afterwards.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:47, 13 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think I got signed up somehow, after jumping into a discussion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can we have non-sysops on the panel? I'd like to invite a friend from Wikipedia to join it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:00, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== If I understand correctly, you are the local math expert. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If so, maybe you can take a look at [[Relativistic mass|this]] and some of that editor's other contributions. They seem pretty obscure/specialized for the general reader, to me, at least. Thanks! [[User:MrMorganH|MrMorganH]] 10:15, 14 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not an expert, but I know a lot about high school math. Andy's brother knows much more than I do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:55, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Revert ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good morning (afternoon?) Ed, why was my comment reverted? I can't see why it should be? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:54, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gosh, you're quick on the trigger. See your talk page for my response. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:58, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I am indeed quick on the trigger, I like Westerns you see..:-)  I have responded to you on my talk-page and re asked the question in a more cordial manner. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:59, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Conservapedia  Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings have begun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel proceeding have begun here:  [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings]] You can start making your edits to the page should you wish to do so.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:59, 17 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Farewell ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, in all sincerity you are by far the most interesting person I have met at Conservapedia.  I regret that we couldn't get along better, though we did manage to improve a number of things.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:12, 18 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We'd have gotten along better if we more goals in common. Building a trustworthy encyclopedia apparently was not one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=893745 this drive by attack] you dodged my request for specific instances of the problem you complained of. (Note: saying &amp;quot;all of them&amp;quot; is a a typical liberal dodge. That's like global warming alarmists saying, &amp;quot;Just look at the temperature record; the evidence is all there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For those listening in to this fascinating drama, the difference between real science and liberal junk science is that real scientists provide examples of what they're talking about, so that anyone can check it out and see for themselves. Liberals and other pseudoscientists '''pretend''' that they've already made the point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It reminds me of Japan, which always (1) says that it &amp;quot;already apologized&amp;quot; for the [[comfort women]] episode while steadfastly (2) refusing ever to admit that it did anything wrong. They are hoping we'll all be too polite to mention that #1 contradicts #2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice try on the parting shot, but your pretense of trying oh so hard fools no one. You're always welcome to come back if you '''ever''' choose to help this project instead of undermining it with trickery. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pontiac==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for your help archiving my page.  I know you are very experienced with Wikis, but I was wondering why you removed what I wrote about the government shut down of Pontiac destroying American history.  A lot of people were really upset about Pontiac's closure and there are lots of websites and articles proving this, why can't it be in the article?  I will differ to your judgement because you are so experienced, but just want to understand your reasoning. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 22:46, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can't be in the article until you find a way to make it trustworthy. Use references. You can't just write stuff off the top of your head, because you are not an established author. You are in fact an anonymous person, and we don't even know whether Craig is your real name. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If there's a lot of proof for your assertion, be sure to provide references, like:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The New York Times reported that after GM was taken over by the government, brands like Saturn and Pontiac were sold or eliminated (link and/or date)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you need help formatting references, lots of people here can help. But '''you''' must supply them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:43, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Pictures==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, how do I add pictures?  --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 16:08, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can't add pictures, until you've made enough useful contributions to earn upload rights. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:34, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In addition, Craig, you can use [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]] until you earn uploading privileges. A Sysop will do it for you.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 21:59, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll work even harder to earn my rights!   I also wanted to apologize for being so familiar, my mom pointed out that I should be calling you Mr. Poor. I always call adults by their last names in real life, but on the internet I usually forget.  Also thanks Mr. Wilson for your advice about upload requests. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 13:24, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::No worries. I wouldn't mind if you called me James or Jim, but I'm glad your mother has taught you well. Also, you will need a lot more work to earn uploading privileges, just so you know. Happy editing in the meantime!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 14:21, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit conflict ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just got edit conflicted by you on the Morse code page - what are the odds we'd both be working on it! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:19, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One thought leads to another ... not such long odds. Sorry about stepping on your work. Feel free to revert, and I'll recover later. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Its all OK, I added my work to your version. Great minds think alike, more like an average mind in my case but you catch my drift...:-) [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:24, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== signature ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you don't mind, but I borrowed the format of your signature to use for my own. It's simple and to the point, but looks nice as well, so I thought I would use it as well. Thank you! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:02, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I copied mine from someone else, so &amp;quot;[[Pay It Forward]].&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:27, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, ok. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:23, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== like wikipedia? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i looked up [[milk]] and [[butter]] how is this conserivtive? is it like wikipedia at all what can i add? ty. --[[User:Rainbowboiz|Rainbowboiz]] 00:35, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not unless your spelling improves. And we are not so much &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; as [[trustworthy]]. Unlike Wikipedia, we really do try to avoid political bias. Add anything that is correct and useful. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:17, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meat Loaf ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know his stage name is much better known (I'm writing the article on him, obviously), but wouldn't you think using the subject's real name is more appropriate for an encyclopedia? If you think the article should be titled under his stage name, you're the boss, but I thought I might want to point that out. Thanks!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 11:14, 1 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me as I am fairly new to this wiki.  I have attempted to propose a discussion for deletion on this particular page.  Before disccussing this, I have followed the instructions on templates via the help index [[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Articles_for_deletion]] to add it to a discussion for deletion but this does not seem to work so I have not proceded further - with hindsight I should have guessed there was something wrong by the lack of entries on this page.  &lt;br /&gt;
My reason for wishing to commence this discussion is that I suspect the article (created by a user who does not appear to have an active talk page) seems to me to be parody and trolling to debase the credibility of this project.  In my opinion, most of the logic followed in nearly every assertion is spurious and often uses blatant synthesis that a ten year old could question.  It is to such an extent that I don't think an &amp;quot;improved&amp;quot; version would be posible.  Of course, others may have different oppinions which is why I am trying to be fair and open it for rational discussion.  What is the correct procedure?  Thank you in advance - answer to my talk page [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 19:54, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure what the correct procedure is. Maybe you could post on the talk page, showing a few examples of &amp;quot;spurious&amp;quot; assertions. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:46, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok I can do this, but I'm surprised that hte Help feature supplies a redundant page on discoussing articles for deletion.  I was also under the impression that you had Sysop/Admin powers and would be familiar with such policies as it is a feature on other wikis.  [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 13:31, 8 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually I know policy fairly well and do have Sysop/Admin powers. Either provide the requested examples, or drop the matter. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:47, 10 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sid 3050 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sid 3050 was blocked for three month for ''trolling''. The only edit he made during the day before his block seems to be to answer to your question in a section above (''So, will it go away if you ignore it?'') - see his [[Special:Contributions/Sid 3050|list of contributions]]. You had personally addressed this comment (''But I'll take a look at Sid's material below now, just to be a good sport.''), so you should be able to judge whether such a comment is ''trolling''. Could you please review Sid's block? In a timely fashion? Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 09:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sid was trolling. Whether this justifies a three month block is up to the admin in question. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm always open to suggestions for making Conservapedia more trustworthy. If you have anything specific in mind, please speak up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of particular interest to me would be any material relating to the contrast between conservative and liberal viewpoints on American political issues, as well as philosophy, religion and science. To my regret, repeated invitations to include users who are ideological opponents of this project have not met with an enthusiastic response. It's almost as if they wish to conceal their ideological differences; ironically, this could be seen as self-censorship. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If anyone wants to describe liberal POV here they may, provided only that it is clearly labeled as such - not presented as gospel. This should not be an onerous requirement: it's the same as Wikipedia's NPOV policy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:42, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Help! A user called CortA is currently vandalising articles. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:15, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, Andy blocked him. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misled by RonLar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was quite astonished by your last actions. I slept over it and want to clarify my earlier remark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd appreciate if you would be less generous with your slight innuendos (''&amp;quot;thanks for nothing!&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;misled by RonLar&amp;quot;''): these make it difficult to assume ''good faith'' on your side. And they have the annoying tendency to backfire...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*my statement ''&amp;quot;Where is the right place to propose an alternative viewpoint? Surely not in the article itself, but on its talk-page. This is a simple necessity for all protected articles, but a good idea for most of those articles some sysops feel strongly about.&amp;quot;'' is hardly misleading - even though it is not written by a native speaker! In fact, it is echoing the sentiments of Conservapedia's [[Conservapedia:Editing etiquette|editing etiquettes]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should discuss changes made by an Administrator before reverting their edits. Administrators are charged with seeing that article content is in line with Conservapedia guidelines. [[Edit war]]ring with an Administrator usually results in a temporary block.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should not alter the editorial content of an article away from a [[conservative]], or [[Christian]], or [[family friendly]] &amp;quot;tone&amp;quot; without discussing proposed changes on the talk page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'''Never make substantial edits to an article without discussing your changes first on the talk page. If you have a reasonable expectation that other editors will accept your change(s), the changes are just formatting / copy editing, you should proceed.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inserting an alternative viewpoint is most certainly a ''substantial edit'' - and the etiquettes advise you to discuss such an edit at first on the talk-page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So, I made a true statement, in accordance with Conservapedia's policy on editing, and you '''misread''' it. To reiterate: You weren't '''misled''', you simply '''misread''' it. And this misunderstanding (of your part) you took as a reason to erase the whole section and seemingly not to read the rest of my comment? Deleting a section on censorship is always a little bit ironic...  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*BTW: whether the article is protected or not is not of any interest for the discussion of censorship! A library does not only censor the books it throws from it shelves, but the books it doesn't allow into it shelves in the first place!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I put the whole section up [[User:RonLar|here]], so you can read it carefully again. Take your time, but nevertheless, react timely - you said that  would be important....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 12:05, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:At this point, I think it's become abundantly clear that complaining about censorship will get you nowhere.  I realize users will come up and be frustrated by certain site traditions, but that's just the way Conservapedia is run, RonLar.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 13:41, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry, I thought you were saying the article was protected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I'm astonished to think that you consider adding alternative viewpoints to be something that has to be '''cleared''' with a sysop first. My understanding of project policy is that all contributors are free to describe non-conservative, non-Christian views ... especially on an article describing a controversy between the two sides. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:38, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Apology accepted. Perhaps you could revert your reaction to this misunderstanding by reintroducing the section which you erased from your talk-page?&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please read [[User:RonLar#Again, the previous example of ideological censorship, in detail]] - all of it, not only the first sentence. This should answer some of your questions.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please address the incident which I mentioned there.&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 16:56, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Eh? I thought you wanted help. Please answer my question: Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:39, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::How is it a sensible use of my time to answer new questions  when you seem to ignore my answers to your old ones? Please remember your statements:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Unless you can show at least one diff, where a senior editor censored something ... merely because it disagreed with some conservative shibboleth ... than you ought to stop saying this. I address this not so much to you, as to those who follow you or travel alongside you.'' }}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::and&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''I asked for an instance of ideological censorship.''}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, you find it here: [[User:RonLar#Again.2C_the_previous_example_of_ideological_censorship.2C_in_detail]] Of course I am willing to answer any question concerning this specific example of censorship, especially those which indicate that you read the whole comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 02:41, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nearly two weeks later: Did you take a look? Or even better, did you read the whole thing? [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 18:17, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-Clancy cracks? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general I'm a Clancy fan but I think some of the criticism you removed was valid. For example by the time he wrote &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; his standards of research had perceptibly dropped (The AH-64 has a 20mm gun? Really?) and &amp;quot;Red Rabbit&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Teeth of the Tiger&amp;quot; were frankly rubbish. Maybe some of the criticisms should stay? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:09, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Anything can stay if properly sourced: X said Y about Z. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:10, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What would be an acceptable source? I have all Clancy's books; would they be acceptable sources for pointing out declining standards of technical accuracy? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:20, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::LOL, '''your''' interpretation of Clancy's writings would be (what is called at Wikipedia) original research. If you don't know what I meant by 'properly sourced', then you're unqualified to contribute anything further to this project. If you do know, you're just toying with me. Godspeed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough. What I'd do is reference both Clancy's books and technical sources that contradict them, such as the fact that the AH-64 does NOT have a 20mm gun. Like I said I'm generally a Clancy fan - &amp;quot;Without Remorse&amp;quot; may just be the best thriller ever written - but his last few books have been a bit disappointing and his research has definitely slipped. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:28, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What I would propose is to remove the comments about &amp;quot;The sum of all fears&amp;quot; - a nuclear weapon could be built with a table saw and a small lathe, never mind optical milling equipment - but keep and expand on the comment about the declining level of technical accuracy. The divergence of the Ryanverse from reality isn't important because it IS fiction, but the declining level of research and tendency towards unrealistic assessments of real-world capabilities IS important. For example &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; is utterly unrealistic even in the Ryanverse. If China invaded Russia they'd get about ten feet over the border before being annihilated. The fortifitions on the Sino-Russian border make the Maginot line look like a sand castle on the beach, and they were actually designed by strategic thinkers. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:44, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On second thought, maybe I'm being too hard on you. I recently started tutoring schoolchildren, and I'm learning to be more patient with their quaint notions. After all, making wrong guesses and getting them corrected is often the best way to learn. Shall I not condescend to grant you the same grace? ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've read all Tom Clancy's [[Jack Ryan]] and [[John Clark]] novels. I always assumed that any discrepancies were inserted on purpose; Clancy certainly would have no reason to put correct information on how to make a suitcase-sized nuclear bomb in his books: what conservative would want to inspire a copycat crime? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to include &amp;quot;criticism&amp;quot; by some published author who says an attack helicopter does or does not have a certain sized gun, go ahead. He's also not very accurate about the software used in the stock market, although it was a key plot element in ''[[Debt of Honor]]''. (Come to think of it, if a man knew everything and wanted to make money betting on horse races, he would know not to put all his winnings on the next race (&amp;quot;[[John Doe]]&amp;quot; TV series pilot). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:56, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Language ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Big_Bang_theory Language like this] makes me extremely uncomfortable: &amp;quot;when grownups talk&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;woman's logic is strange, don't you think&amp;quot;, etc. (especially this in his earlier statements: &amp;quot;and being educated briefly by my grandpa in matters &amp;quot;of faith&amp;quot;, mostly about &amp;quot;Catholic errors&amp;quot;, and the absolute need to be trufhful, my concern was that the Catholics are wrong on one more point since the Big Bang was proven wrong in 1985&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I am not a woman. My identity is very well known and I am quite easy to find. Ottava means eight, and Ottava Rima means Eight Rhyme, a type of rhyming pattern used in Italian epic poetry. Second, his language is condescending, misogynistic, religiously bigoted, etc. Third, his claims about the Big Bang Theory are rather strange, conspiratorial, and nothing I have ever heard by any legitimate scientist. I cannot honestly believe that he is a real conservative but I believe he is a plant just like many of the people who vandalize. His job is to produce some of the most absurd stuff to try and make conservatives look awful. If I am wrong, I am wrong, but his language does not seem like something that is appropriate. I talked to Geoff Plourde about this quite a bit tonight because it bothered me a lot. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:44, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Um ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism and obesity]] - is this a joke? It seems to be just a list of fat atheists. It even has random tidbits like &amp;quot;Chuck Norris endorses the Total Gym exercise system.[59]&amp;quot; I know many priests who are overweight, and many religious people who are. I know many atheists who are ultra thing and anorexic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Christian and Library of Congress researcher's explanations of reports of UFOs &amp;quot; How would that even deal with atheism and obesity? Yet it is in there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page looks like it was created to make Conservapedia and conservatism look really bad. Sigh. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:58, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:User:Conservative is good at attracting readership to this website. The [[Atheism and obesity]] seems to me a bit of payback for the liberals who call Rush Limbaugh a big, fat idiot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And in his payback, he demeans everyone who is overweight, including myself. I've dealt with mean-spirited behavior from people about weight the majority of my life - there is no acceptable reason for being hostile about the issue. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 16:53, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== You were looking for ideological censorship? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bestiality&amp;amp;curid=88619&amp;amp;diff=920267&amp;amp;oldid=920266 easy to find] --[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 23:52, 23 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not as easy as you say. See [[Talk:Bestiality]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:44, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Senior Admin assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, I would like to bring something to your attention as a senior administrator. I have been in private communication with User:SamCoulter over the last few weeks. There is nothing in his attitude and comments to me in private and his behaviour here on Conservapedia to suggest this user is anything but sincere. He was recently blocked for the edit [http://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/SamCoulter here] (the last edit he made - I will not link directly to it because the topics are extremely offensive and not family friendly). For this effort he was blocked for three months. His edit was a) relevant b) correct according to the article linked and c) was a link which was on the front page already. It seems that some users wanted to quote the article without implying the articles conclusions as they were at loggerheads with a users personal opinion. I don't think the user should have been blocked but now he is I won't remove it but I do believe that 3 months is extremely heavy-handed. I don't want to create controversy so I will not chnage the block myself but I am bringing this up with you and User:Karajou also (I am unable to contact the blocking sysop). Thank you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:11, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Keep him blocked. He vandalized twice. In fact, I am going to increase the time blocked. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:02, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Do you have evidence of this vandalism? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:04, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If you want to defend those recent contributions be my guest. If you want to wrangle with me about them, it is not going to happen. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I tell you now '''there was no vandalism''' you are blocking a user for adding sourced and factual material. You are blocking him for no reason! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but it's actually very easy to avoid a block. I suggest you start coaching new users about courtesy, project goals, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I myself disagree with the project goals of RW, but they haven't given me any long blocks. Why? Because I follow their rules in their house.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adolescents often have trouble figuring out what the rules are, or trouble realizing the benefits of following them. (In the long run, civil disobedience campaigns against beneficial institutions such as Democracy and Free Markets simply backfire.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:52, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I respectfully disagree with you. It's incredibly ''easy'' to get blocked on this site, because honestly, it appears to depend on the whim of the blocking editor (doesn't like what's being said because it's contrary to the blocking editor's opinion, got up on the wrong side of the bed, had a fight with someone in real life and are taking it out on editors here at CP.) You yourself just handed out an ''infinite'' block for ''defending'' someone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Many editors, myself included, have protested User:Conservative's articles and his method of defending them. If anyone objects, he automatically deems them an atheist/evolutionist, etc., which at least in my case, is far from the truth. I object to several things. First, his use of &amp;quot;obese&amp;quot; as a ''ad hominem'' attack against people whose ideas he disagrees with. I've dealt with bullying behavior about weight most of my life, and have tried to point out to him how hurtful his taunts are, but he thinks it's amusing, and the other sysops here (yourself included) appear to agree. I'm all for a good discussion about ''ideas'', but when the attacks become personal, and all-inclusive, then yes, I'm going to protest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Second, most of the articles are just ''badly, badly written''. They meander ''miles'' away from the original topic, they tend to be a bunch of quotes lumped together, and in many of them, the point that he's trying to make is missed completely. The actual subjects might be valid, and important enough to warrent an article on them, but creating 10 articles that say the same thing, and that can (and should) be consolidated into one, '''''well-researched and well-written document''''', is just poor scholarship. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:53, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, thank you for not giving me an excuse to block you! ;-) Very well written . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As I've said elsewhere, [http://ameriwiki.wikkii.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;amp;diff=4073&amp;amp;oldid=4071] I disagree with the stance of &amp;quot;the admin&amp;quot; who is making ''[[ad hominem]]'' attacks on atheists; I think it's a misguided attempt to attract readership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If anyone's had a '''good''' edit reverted for a bad reason, they can just let me know. Just remember: if anyone is criticizing to condemn, I'm not interested, but if they want me to change things, I'm the man who can do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:03, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BrentH's block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see you blocked BrentH for trolling and reverted 2 of his edits. He linked [[Professor]] to an existing article here on CP, [[Professor values]]. Why was that trolling? --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 19:55, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps prior edits?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 20:01, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::User: Ed Poor did not appreciate the section right above this one--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 21:14, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::BrentH made a perfectly reasonable and respectful suggestion. It would appear from the edit history that he was referring to an article about Winona Ryder, created by Ed Poor, which contained one piece of trivia but no basic information regarding the person whatsoever. What BrentH said is simply common sense, and I too cannot see how this can justify a block. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 22:45, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Indeed, certain longstanding members of this community seem to have rather thin skin.  I did not see BrentH's post as offensive or out of line--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 22:54, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This is an encyclopedia. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You wrote that on my talkpage. ''This is an encyclopedia.''. Well, if it is articles like [[bestiality and Britain]] ahould be deleted because, as I have pointed out numerous times, it has nothing to do with bestiality and Britain. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:27, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Article deleted. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=delete&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1]&lt;br /&gt;
::Hey thanks Ed. Just for the record though I wasn't &amp;quot;bothered&amp;quot; by the content so much as bothered by the ''lack'' of content. As the commandments say - everything must be true and verifiable which that article clearly wasn't. Many thanks. I must admit - I have a lot of respect for you and karajou. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ed, evolution was birthed in Britain and secularism has grown rampant in their country. Now their society is a mess and there is rioting in the streets. In addition, the'' Guardian'' just published a puff piece on bestiality. I say enough is enough and it's time their moral rot is exposed. I realize that pointing out that folly and consequences of atheism/evolutionism annoys liberals, but so what. Not only are they grossly and obviously in error, but atheists/evolutionists have shown themselves [[Atheism and cowardice|to be timid little bunnies]]. I restored the article because I feel confident that Conservapedia can stand up to foolish and timid little bunnies. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:21, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Enough with the insults conservative. I am neither a liberal nor an atheist and am sick to death of you accusing me of such. The article has nothing, I repeat '''nothing''' about the practice in Britain. I say again '''nothing'''. You poor scholarship is on show and we can ''all'' see it. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:02, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ed, a Brit was trying to bring over his deviant farming practices to the United States as can be seen [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7600523/British-man-51-arrested-at-bestiality-farm.html HERE]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:28, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::You misread the article, Conservative. The Oregon farm is owned by an American. The British man was visiting it. Read [http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-seattle/seattle-convicted-cocaine-smuggler-arrested-likely-into-bestiality-liking-sex-with-animals here] for a version of the story that makes who owned the farm clearer. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keldaby goats.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|An exclusive British art gallery was criticised for displaying a highly offensive bestiality oriented painting which featured a [[goat]] just yards from The Ritz hotel and where it could be seen by children.- The Daily Mail online (MailOnline), August 5, 2011 ''The explicit art that shows bestiality with a goat just yards from The Ritz'']]&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::There is no way I'd let children any where this site with Conservatives despicable articles all over the place. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Max, I heard Oregon was pretty liberal. It figures the farm was in Oregon. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:30, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::I heard that most states are pretty liberal... But that doesn't make the rumors true. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 22:34, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Oregon voted for Obama plus fairly recently they had the most atheists per capita in the United States. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:57, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Omaha, Nebraska also voted for obama but calling it liberal is very silly--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:58, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/new-poll-identifies-most-liberal-and-conservative-states/ Oregon is liberal] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:07, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm slightly confused as to why it's relevant or not that Oregon is liberal. After all the state DOES have a law against bestiality, so that argues against liberals being tolerant of it. --[[User:ColSharp|ColSharp]] 08:33, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Since when do liberals obey the laws on the books in the first place? This photo [http://www.conservapedia.com/File:1915b7ec753fa9d0352885dc23da4469.jpg] is proof that liberals have no intention of obeying laws regarding littering.  They trashed Washington D.C. ''when they got their way'', January 20, 2009.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:10, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's a law in New Jersey about recycling, yet I know several conservatives who refuse to recycle. Why is this? [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 13:26, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request for Admin assistance  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To all senior admins and sysops. I am being repeatedly abused by user:conservative who, among other things, accuses me continuously of being an atheist simply because I point out some of the holes in his articles. See [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;curid=113357&amp;amp;diff=924642&amp;amp;oldid=924636 here for the latest accusation]. I have asked him numerous times to desist with his sneering name calling as I find it offensive to have my faith questioned and nothing is ever done. He state’s I am atheist because I don’t agree with some of his ridiculous contentions. In actual fact it isn’t even that I disagree with him it is that I point out his shoddy research, poor scholarship and his berating, insulting and sarcastic behaviour towards others. I am of the opinion now that he is purposely calling me names because he knows I don’t like it which is unchristian, impolite and, above all, insulting. Is anyone going to teach this man some manners? Has Conservapedia become a place where Conservative is allowed to behave this way without any warning or comeuppance but all other editors and warned and blocked for minor infractions.  He is in continual violation of the commandments yet NOTHING is done whereas people like myself are always watching out to avoid being banned. Well, fine, ban me if you like. I probably will be after this posting and no doubt Conservative will cackle with glee at “winning” again. But laugh Conservative, you win nothing. I post this is full knowledge that I might be blocked banned and insulted by you in my absence and I have always remained polite and civil plus I can hold my head up high. Hopefully one of you will take a stand and insist on standards of civility. But I don’t hold out much hope. Thanks, many of you were kind, decent people whom I enjoyed working with and I pray for you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:21, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I am disappointed in you most of all Ed. Coming from wikipedia and being the first to jump on others for incivility you ignore when it comes to the ruling chaste of Conservapedia. You should be ashamed. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:48, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Max, I think you assume entirely too much about my dispositions.  You really don't know what extent I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; or if I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; at all. You also don't know what value I place on &amp;quot;winning&amp;quot;. In fact, you don't even know if I am one person or a team.  I/we remain inscrutable. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:24, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::User:Conservative, this is getting silly. You wrote for instance:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::''Actually KhalidM, I have a very outgoing personality and a university professor friend of mine told me that I would make a great administrator because I can be very diplomatic. While I realize that I will never cultivate a large atheist or liberal fan club, I can live with that. Conservative 20:34, 5 October 2011 (EDT) ''&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, while your grammatical gender may be undetermined, your number isn't. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:44, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== King George I ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article of [[King George I]] was deleted as a ''creation of vandals''. On the talk page I read the comment of User:RJJense: ''I added much new text, all of which I wrote, and previously posted on Citizendium.'' I looked up the article at Citizendium and it seemed to be quite informative - certainly not vandalistic! Could it be restored? I'd like to insert a valid link into [[elector]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I restored the last version by RJJense. I feel confident that his last version was a good article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:34, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks - it really seems so! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;New Ordeal&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I noticed that you placed the quotation marks around the term &amp;quot;New Ordeal.&amp;quot; As you have probably noticed I have been attempting to fix that article. Quite frankly, the article is pretty bad to start with and several of the references that prior authors cited have nothing to do with the topic. Do you know if there is procedure in which this article may be recommended for deletion? --[[User:Padams|Padams]] 15:33, 15 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Better to mark it as an essay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, 19 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block of AugustO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I looked at [[Conservapedia:Editor's_guide#If_you_get_blocked]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you get blocked, it's probably because you (1) broke the rules and (2) ignored hints, requests and/or warnings. So the first thing you should do is review your communications with others here, particularly those who are admins. Have you been trying to get along by following our practices and supporting our goals, or have you been trying to change our ways? If you are new here, it's best to go along to get along. After you have contributed a lot, we'll be more likely to listen to your suggestions, but breaking the rules will just end up with eliminating you from the project. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I can't think of any rule which I broke&lt;br /&gt;
::*I was requested to ''to do some charitable work somewhere instead''. I'm already engaged in such work, so this doesn't apply...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't try to ''change our ways''. I try to correct factual errors (e.g.,  ιδού can be translated as ''at this moment'' or that it is right to call ''Carolus Martellus'' the grandson of ''Carolus Magnus''.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Perhaps upon reflection you may realize that you'd rather be part of the project than insist on your own way. You might want to apologize and get unblocked. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't insist on my own way and I apologize if anyone feels insulted by my criticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you want to discuss your block, '''do not create a new account'''. Rather, use one of the following methods to appeal the decision (listed in order of preference). ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Here, I obviously failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. ''Contact the person who blocked you (see below).&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
2. ''If you get no reply after a reasonable amount of time, you may contact any Administrator.&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
3. ''Email cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com giving the name of the Administrator or editor who blocked you, and the date, and it will be forwarded on to them. &lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you contact more than one person about this, please do them the courtesy of letting them know who else you have tried contacting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
::*This should be obvious from the header of my emails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Contacting an Administrator or editor can usually be done by one of the following methods: ''&lt;br /&gt;
*''Use the &amp;quot;Email this user&amp;quot; link in the toolbox. This, however, will only work if both you and the Administrator or editor have enabled this on your/their respective accounts.&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Administrator or editor may have provided an email address or other contact information (e.g. AIM) on their user page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*This section seems to be obsolete: ''email this user'' doesn't work for any of the administrators I tried to reach. And I couldn't get Ed Poor's email address via his user page. So we are in a [[Catch 22]] kind of situation...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I emailed to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;aschlafy@aol.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;conservapedia@zoho.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. I didn't get any reply (is 1-2 days a ''reasonable amount of time'' to wait? I thinks so...) to my short email which stated: ''I understand that my criticisms of CBP and the World History Lectures are quite unwelcome, but they are hardly trolling! I'd appreciate if you lift my block.''&lt;br /&gt;
::*So I decided to create a new account to appeal the block, hoping that the advice against this action is as obsolete as other sections of the ''editor's guide''.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 07:56, 26 October 2011 (EDT) (AugustO)&lt;br /&gt;
:::August, I think you should start a career in sales. You certainly have the persistence to be a good salesman. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:47, 26 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed Poor, the block of AugustO is now more than a week old. I tried to reach you via various channels - could you please lift the block as the stated reason (&amp;quot;trolling&amp;quot;) doesn't apply? [[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 11:09, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please get a [[writing plan]] from him and get it to me, and I'll consider it. Meanwhile, any sysop is free to unblock him. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:01, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Is that any official Sysop, or anyone with Block rights? I'd be happy to unblock Mr O so that he can post his writing plan.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:25, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::On second thoughts, perhaps I'll just go ahead. Please reverse my action if I'm overstepping the mark.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:33, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thanks for the unblock!&lt;br /&gt;
*I read the article on the [[writing plan]], and I'll try to provide you with one. This would be easier if a ''sample plan'' were provided. But nonetheless, here it is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mainly I'm interested in the CBP. Mind you, I'm not ''Junker Jörg'', I'm not capable to create a translation on my own which stands for hundreds of years. But I think that translating the Bible in a group, and extensively discussing your work is a marvelous way to get a greater insight into the ''Book of books''.  While doing so, I try to dig into what Conservative calls the ''ANE culture'', as you can see [[Talk:John_1-7_(Translated)#Issue_with_translation_of_John_4:53|here]], where I try to shed light on timekeeping during the Roman empire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I came here, I thought that there would be a group of likewise interested individuals, but at the moment there seems to be only one other editor with similar interests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As my approach to the CBP generates quite a few edits on talk-pages, I balance these with edits to articles. These tend to by connected somehow with my namesakes (August of Saxony, Ernest August of Hanover), the history - or just happen on pages where I read something which puzzled me :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:21, 8 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion issue ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be a great idea to merge the articles. In fact, if you were interested in expanding the article, I might be interested in helping.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:28, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please help me organize this. We should give prominence to conservative views, but let's steer away from censoring liberal views. It would be nice if liberals could see '''why''' conservatives believe differently. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:43, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::OK!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:48, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged the articles and added a bit on abortion and political ideology. How is it?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:53, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks for the change but==&lt;br /&gt;
perhaps it should be bed bugs (plural), and now when i make an edit and it goes thru, if i try to make another one i get &amp;quot;Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it&amp;quot; but no one has. Going back to page and trying anew results in the same. 3.1: longetivity should be longevity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus is Lord, thanks[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 07:58, 5 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback here ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback [http://conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Panel_members.2C_please_give_your_feedback_below HERE]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your assistance would be much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:05, 16 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have explained my ideas in private email to you and Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:50, 11 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  a few messages to you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few messages to you here: http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Air_superiority [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:14, 26 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for picking up some of my &amp;quot;wiki litter&amp;quot; that I left behind (redirects to non-existent pages). I will try to be more diligent as far as not littering in the future. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:22, 11 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. And don't bother yourself: it's better for you to focus your time on building the wiki, while less talented contributors like myself do the routine housekeeping. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If I had your writing skill, I'd be making whole article like you do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:34, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A message to you from Cipe ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixing a MediaWiki message: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you perform the edit I described [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;oldid=992864#Edit_request here, on very bottom of the page]? I asked Aschlafly but he's probably busy now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 15:33, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know the basics of Wiki coding and not the advanced level coding. I would ask someone else. Try Ed Poor. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:32, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unfortunately, I cannot edit Ed's talk page. Could you suggest someone different? Or message him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The change is rather small and requires only copy-and-paste. More directly: you can copy contents of this: [[User:Cipe/MW_fix]] to: [[MediaWiki:Revision-info]]. Even if my suggestion is wrong, it can be reverted, so there is no danger. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 16:41, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, I did it. But where can I see the results? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:53, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you very much. You'll see it when checking older revision. Here is an example: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that MediaWiki has a different message when you're checking current revision. I'll prepare fix in a moment. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 17:55, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The message seems to have logged me out. I think it needs fixing. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:56, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I also got logged out, but only once. I can consistently see the new message now. Perhaps the software logs out when a edit to MediaWiki is made. Could you please copy [[User:Cipe/MW fix 2]] to [[MediaWiki:Revision-info-current]]? I promise it's the last change :) It is shown for a permalink to current revision. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:08, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't think that's it. I think you need to put the '''www.''' in front of '''www.conservapedia.com''' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It seems to work. I can see the messages: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546 for past revisions] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=992065 for current revision]. Thanks for changing. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:19, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you for unlocking your talk page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really appreciate being able to get in contact with you directly when the circumstances arise.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 18:39, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
Now he can try to justify what he said about the article. [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 14:29, 14 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== File:GoreFireBreathing.jpg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think it would be appropriate to use this image in the [[Current TV]] article? It's already in Gore's main article, so why not include it in the article about his obscure TV network on channel 9800 on my TV? --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:35, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== apology. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I just wanted to apologise for the comments I made related to you, they were impolite and unnecessary.  I don't have anything against you or anything, I just posted something that I thought was relevent without thinking how it would be taken by anyone other than myself, as it happened they were rude and quite personal.  I acknowledge that I behaved quite badly, and in future I will try to avoid giving you, or others, offense.  So..... virtual handshake?[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 06:18, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, don't be so dramatic. Just comment on the articles and issues of the day, and forget about personalities. That's how this project's supposed to run. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:33, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::lol. Nah it's difficult to tell over the internet how people are reacting, so for all I knew you could have been quite insulted or something, and I had to make sure that I was being very clear. Anyway, cool[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 01:03, 19 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not sure you get it: We don't want personal remarks on this wiki, clear or not. You need to be clear only about one thing: what you intend to write about an article topic. You must not comment on other users in any way. Is '''that''' clear? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== On Personal Attacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As someone who has been the subject of personal comments (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987753&amp;amp;oldid=987715], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987827&amp;amp;oldid=987777], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987956&amp;amp;oldid=987955], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=990739&amp;amp;oldid=990566]), I would like to share my opinion on Conservapedia's policy on personal attacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it is very appropriate to make '''relevant''' comments on editing and other wiki behavior to determine what the best practices are with regards to editing and other actions and, if necessary, to instruct users who may not know better about such practices.  For example, I have informed two administrators about redacting the automatically-generated deletion log entry to remove sensitive material.  I have also asked one administrator to include source information in that user's uploaded images, requests with which this user has complied.  Likewise, if someone has a habit of posting comments on talk pages without signing them, it is appropriate to inform them of how to sign posts.  Further, if someone is about to violate 90/10, a warning is definitely appropriate.  None of these have to do with the real-life '''personality''' that these editors, many of whom are brothers and sisters in Christ, have; these comments focus on on-wiki '''behavior'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, I think that if someone is going to make a statement regarding real-life facts or Conservapedia's commandments, policies, and best practices, it is appropriate to debate this statement '''without going into personality details'''.  Such debate may very well include Socratic or rhetorical questioning as a argumentative device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, Mr. Schlafly is the owner of the site, so he has the final say in this, but I'm sure he would agree with what I have written.  Although attacks on another editor's real-life personality should generally be removed, I do not see the need to remove good-faith debate and discussion over user '''behavior''' at Conservapedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for reading this.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 12:36, 21 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, thanks, Greg. If I err on the side of &amp;quot;absolutely nothing about the person&amp;quot; to an absurd point, please continue to help me out. I'm mainly opposed to comments like, &amp;quot;You're a jerk&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I don't have to follow the rules.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nothing wrong with '''friendly''' personal comments, like, &amp;quot;Thanks for pointing out that a rigid, absolutist enforcement of the rules may not be wise.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hey Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw your Arbcom case over at Wikipedia just today looking through for cases of bias there. :) Wikipedia's - nuts, huh? Lol. I ran into the Obama bias team over there in Scjessey, Wikidemon, and company, back in late 2009. It's become so hopelessly biased by now you've just got to laugh. They know they're keeping all controversy out of the Obama page and how biased they are, and don't care. Well, all my facts are at Conservapedia's services now. :) Anyway, just saying it's nice to see another ex-Wikipedian here I guess - hope we get some more! :) --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Jzyehoshua]] 01:15, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tehpwn3r==&lt;br /&gt;
'User names based on your real name or initials are '''preferred'''' does not state that you will be blocked. [[User:Conservative|Also]].--[[User:Wishnaka|Wishnaka]] 19:51, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inappropriate user name. It has been a general principle that one's user name be &amp;quot;based on one's real first name and last initial&amp;quot;, though there are a number of reasons why that is not always practical. The point is that we don't like the kind of foolish &amp;quot;handles&amp;quot; that are often used in various blogs and social web sites. If you run afoul of this by accident, you will be asked to create a new account, and doing so will not be considered sockpuppetry. Of course, some user names are essentially just vandalism, and are treated that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you don't object, I suggest shortening his block to maybe 3 days. His remark, while rude and impertinent, did have some substance, and a hard block doesn't serve to do anything but cause more unhappiness. Thanks for considering,&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 20:48, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you unblock him, you're responsible. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:54, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I recommend keeping the week. And don't &amp;gt; dont. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:01, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for pointing out the typo.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 23:35, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Michael Baumgartner==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
Please do a careful side-by-side comparison of [[Michael Baumgartner]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Baumgartner&amp;amp;oldid=509330054 the Wikipedia article]. I did a google search on &amp;quot;Michael Baumgartner&amp;quot; and came up with a number of sources including the Wikipedia article.  I took notes from all of the sources, and wrote a new article based on my notes.  I honestly believe that the article uses a different set of sources, covers ideas in a different order, and covers the topic differently than Wikipedia.  Please take another look, and if you agree, please restore [[Michael Baumgartner]]. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:05, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*I understand the workload you face. Could you please look at the article and reconsider? [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:51, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*:Already restored in good faith; I trust you, and I'm not going to compare it closely. I'll leave that to others. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:54, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My condolences ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the death of the Rev Dr Moon. [[User:JuanMotame|JuanMotame]] 18:54, 2 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome. I wonder if you could help me. I tried [[Special:MovePage/William. J. Fulbright]] but apparently I don't have permission. The page should be at [[J. William Fulbright]], the name of the founder of the Fulbright scholarship program.&lt;br /&gt;
:Done.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:26, 4 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sun Myung Moon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You changed the first sentence of the protected article on [[Sun Myung Moon]] from the present to the past tense. Could you take care of the rest of the article, too? Thanks. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:35, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Feel free to take care of that yourself. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I took care of it. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 13:21, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:32, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Requesting Assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Poor,  I'm relatively new here and don't completely know my way around.  Would you please look at my comment concerning [[Talk:American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel|American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel]].  If my view is in line with the site, I'm quite certain that a template or procedure is needed at this point.  If my views are not in line with the site, please feel free to remove that comment as you see fit.  You seem experienced here, so your guidance is requested.  --[[User:Nouniquenames|Nouniquenames]] 00:03, 21 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Psychological manipulation]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that you moved/redirected the above article to [[Essay: Psychological manipulation in the Bible]] on grounds &amp;quot;not a general article; case study uses a Bible story&amp;quot;. I've got somewhat confused about this step, because IMHO the article is general and only the case study section itself contains a &amp;quot;Bible story&amp;quot;. In fact the rest is a combination of various sources, some of them far from having anything to do w/ Bible at all. I was by far not completely done with that article and now I actually do not know how to continue working on it. It says now &amp;quot;This Is An Original Work. Contributors should add their signatures to the end section. If published, a notice will be posted and, if desired, contributors will be recognized.&amp;quot; but that was not my idea at all, I would be more than happy if anyone could help to extend that, in my opinion, general article. If I could suggest anything then I would like to suggest to move only the 'case study' section to the essay realms and keep the rest as general article with hyperlink to that essay in appropriate, perhaps 'See Also' section. I also deem as deficiency that article does not appear in the Psychology category now, I believe it belongs there.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:35, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Objections to evolution]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As for your rationale for redirect on 'Objections to evolution', namely &amp;quot;I thought we already had plenty of articles opposing the Theory of evolution&amp;quot;, I agree with you that &amp;quot;we have&amp;quot;, but still would dare to oppose the redirect on grounds that 'Objections to evolution' is an article that brainwashes people at WP and enjoys special defence by witch-hunters who heavily suppress any different points of view there thus I believe it is of significant importance to have available alternative view on the same topic under the very same title.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:50, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quote Templates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was doing some ''random page'' editing and found that there was a whole load of quote templates you created a while ago that link to nowhere and nothing seems to link to them. It seems the template for linking these quotes never got off the ground. I'm proposing that these either be deleted or put into some sort of quote page as I don't think there much use at the moment (except for possibly taking up server space). Kind Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 02:00, 2 November 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Unificationism]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I am not surprised to see you make changes to the Unificationism page in defense of  your church, but why did you remove the part in which Moon  told an interviewer,  &amp;quot;God is living in me and I am the incarnation of himself.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The whole world is in my hand and I will conquer and subjugate the world.&amp;quot;   [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19459920?print=true]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you saying the BBC made that up?  [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 08:23, 14 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can put that back in. Sorry for the delayed answer; my day job keeps me pretty busy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Be advised, though, that Rev. Moon himself disputed the ''conquer and subjugate'' quote, telling Newsweek interviewers that he had been quoted out of context. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, 20 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Way to stop the spammers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Aschlafly's talk page &lt;br /&gt;
Yesterday after I prayed an idea came to me (most likely from god) to stop the spammers from registering the spam accounts. If we can move away from user captcha and instead use a question that requires some knowledge (for example what team does tim tebow sit on the bench for or which team did he turned around) as the spambots will be completely flummoxed by this. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:16, 19 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The questycaptcha is excellent for this purpose. It stops ocr bots, and most paid spammers. The code would be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   require_once( &amp;quot;$IP/extensions/ConfirmEdit/ConfirmEdit.php&amp;quot; );&lt;br /&gt;
   $wgCaptchaClass = 'QuestyCaptcha';&lt;br /&gt;
   $arr = array (&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;A question?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;An answer!&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;What is this wiki's name?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Conservapedia&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        'Who is Tim Tebow' =&amp;gt; 'An athlete',&lt;br /&gt;
   foreach ( $arr as $key =&amp;gt; $value ) {&lt;br /&gt;
        $wgCaptchaQuestions[] = array( 'question' =&amp;gt; $key, 'answer' =&amp;gt; $value );&lt;br /&gt;
   }&lt;br /&gt;
Which you would place in /rootfiledirectory/localsettings.php[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:54, 19 November 2012 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Given your considerable experience in operating and maintaining wiki's like Wikipedia and convservapedia, do you think you would be able to implement this ? Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 05:12, 23 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A serious Biblical matter==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aschlafly wrote the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. This wouldn't have been to problematic, but now he puts his outlandish idea into an article in the main space ([[Epistle to the Hebrews]]). First he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''the most plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it.'''&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Iduan]] toned this down somewhat, so that we read at the moment:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''one plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it'''.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I couldn't find any Biblical scholar who shares this idea, I couldn't find any authorative figure who promotes this - and this isn't much of a surprise if you read the epistle for yourself!  The only &amp;quot;scholar&amp;quot; who has proposed this &amp;quot;theory&amp;quot; in the last 2000 years is Andrew Schlafly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to delete this sentence, and then I tried to make it clear that this idea is a personal insight by Andrew Schlafly. My edits were reverted:  any reader of this encyclopedia gets the impression that this theory is something commonly known or well discussed. That's utterly untrue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tend to be quite strict on Biblical matters - I'm often accused of being nitpicky.  As one of the sysops of Conservapedia who was active in 2012 I ask you to weigh in on this problem: maybe it is just me and most of the of you and your fellow sysops think that it is acceptable to present an  insight of a single person '''in a Biblical matter''' (an insight shared by virtually no one)  as a plausible theory. But - as the title of this section indicates - for me this is a very serious matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:26, 25 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree. Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, 5 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? &amp;quot;'' As I tried to convey with the phrase &amp;quot;this wouldn't have been to problematic&amp;quot;, there is nothing wrong with the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. But I think it ''is'' problematic that the ''insight'' of the essay spills over into a page in the main space, i.e., [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], and becomes a ''fact'' during this process.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree.&amp;quot;'' It's the other way round: stating the ''insight'' in an article in the main space without making it clear that the only source for this idea is Andrew Schlafly is lending it an improper credibility. If you read an unsourced, unmarked statement in an encyclopedia, the reader generally takes it as a kind of common knowledge, even more so if he is e.g., a high-school pupil.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:28, 6 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a mix of opinion and fact. Each is clearly marked. Talk pages are filled with unsourced claims, and we make very few efforts to police such talk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is currently an unsourced, unmarked statement in an article that needs attention, please point it out to me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you - if unsourced, unmarked statements are reintroduced into the article, I'll point them out to you! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:02, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im new here and need some help. I figured I would go to you since you seem very involved in the community. I recently tried to instate an article about R*tional Wiki and suddenly it was deleted. I thought since we had an article about Wikipedia that we could write about wikis. I also noticed that it had been deleted several times by the same people. Why? The words are spam filtered to. I feel that we need to write about the faults and propaganda of this completely biased website. Not to mention they completely badmouth you in the most rude ways. Please help...--[[User:Colesmithsayshi|Colesmithsayshi]] 14:18, 31 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mass Wedding ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was wanting to know what is the significance of mass weddings in the unification church ? I see your church has recently conducted it's first mass wedding since the very untimely death of the great Sun Myung Moo. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:05, 17 February 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not sure how to respond to messages. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not sure how to answer the message you sent me.  There does not seem to be a way to respond attached to the message you sent.  Do I just respond in this open forum?  Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Math ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings, Ed.  We haven't communicated in quite a while.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason I am writing is that I saw your recent [[Essay:Campaign_to_make_Conservapedia_unusable]].  I know that this has long been an issue, and that you and I have both put a lot of effort into making math/science articles accessible.  I have one comment about it:  ''Your audience for this essay is just yourself.''  All the people who made things inaccessible&amp;amp;mdash;Foxtrot, Lemonpeel, Jaques, etc, are long gone.  So, if you want the situation to improve, instead of writing an essay, you're just going to have to make the improvements yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I'm not sure what articles you have in mind for your criticism.  If it's all the topology stuff ([[Regular_space]], [[Sequentially_compact]], [[Hausdorff_space]], ...), you have my sympathy, and you will just have to delete them.  No one will improve them.  But I strongly advise you ''not'' to delete them.  They aren't doing any harm, and no one reads them (except me :-).  An encyclopedia is not judged by how esoteric its most esoteric articles are, but by how well its mainstream articles are written, and how well those mainstream articles cover the field.  I think the mainstream math articles at Conservapedia, like integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers, are pretty good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which brings me to my specific point.  It isn't true that no one edits math articles any more.  There was a small amount of activity on integers and natural numbers recently.  Perhaps this is what led you to write the essay.  I don't think there was anything over-the-top about the recent edits, and I think you sometimes over-react to things like this.  I believe that the recent edits in that area were well-intentioned, and trying to do a good job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving a really good definition of the integers or natural numbers, in the way that you and I would like, at the appropriate level but with real clarity, is ''impossible''.  Saying &amp;quot;evenly divisible by 1&amp;quot; doesn't work, because the reader who doesn't know what an integer is will have no conception of what division is or what &amp;quot;evenly divisible&amp;quot; means.  Saying &amp;quot;has no fractional part&amp;quot; doesn't work either.  I can see what the author intended--numbers are things like &amp;quot;3.7&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;.7&amp;quot; is the fractional part.  So, having no fractional part means it is something like just 3.  That's correct, but it relies on having an intuitive notion of real numbers, that is, things like 3 and 3.1 and 3.7 and 3.14159....  (Speaking of which, happy pi day!!!)  Now most people have an intuitive feel for numbers with fractions well before they have to think about a formal definition of natural numbers.  I know I did.  That is, I knew about &amp;quot;3&amp;quot; in the context of &amp;quot;3.7 without the .7&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;the biggest markings on a ruler, rather than all the small ones.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how do you write the article?  You do the best you can, giving an imprecise defintion in terms of &amp;quot;numbers that you count with&amp;quot;, or something like that.  (By the way, I really really liked your &amp;quot;mathisfun&amp;quot; web link explaining these things on an elementary level, and I used it (crediting you) in my article at Ameriwiki.)  So the right thing is probably to define &amp;quot;counting numbers&amp;quot;, as in the web link, and accepting that that's the best you can do.  Then address, very lightly, the issue of how that might be different from &amp;quot;natural numbers&amp;quot;, and whether zero is included, and so on.  It's not worth making a big deal about.  Just pick some definitions, and stick to them.  Mention that maybe not everyone agrees.  Don't worry about students getting a bad grade on an exam because of a nit-picking difference--people taking exams will presumably have attended a class and gotten the instructor's view on this, if the instructor thinks it's important.  The way you addressed the issue in the natural number article is just right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, the stuff about integers being &amp;quot;the only integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered and in which order is preserved by addition&amp;quot; is over the top.  Either take it out or move it to the very bottom.  Other than that, I think the natural number / integer articles are in pretty good shape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more thing:  Don't be put off by the fancy &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; symbol.  The people are not trying to show off.  The symbols are cool, and the students will think so.  When I was in junior high, I thought that the summation and integral symbols were really cool, long before I knew what they meant.  Let the students see them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I still say that the Peano axioms would be a good thing to have at Conservapedia.  Nowhere near as complicated as &amp;quot;integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered&amp;quot;, and really interesting for the target audience.  You may copy my Peano article from Ameriwiki if you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:34, 14 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just wanted to add my thoughts as a math graduate student who has made several edits to our math articles.  As someone who plans on becoming a professor, I think it is fundamental that, as an educational resource, Conservapedia has accessible (to the extent possible) math material.  However, we are not limited in space like a print encyclopedia, so there is certainly room for us to have more in-depth coverage of math topics for more advanced scholars.  It's not my intention to make Conservapedia unusable as an educational resource; if you think that my edits are not helpful, please feel free to discuss them with me.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:20, 15 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You may have missed my point, which is that 99% of our readers are concerned with math that is below the college level. I want the majority of our editorial effort in math to focus on what these readers need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 17 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed:  I take exception to your implication that I &amp;quot;missed your point&amp;quot; about the intended audience of CP, or how to write for it.  Be assured that I absolutely, totally, utterly, and completely understand these issues.  If you have any question about this, please see my articles on [[Limit (mathematics)]], [[Algebra]], [[Compass and straightedge]], and [[Cramer's rule]].  ''These are all topics that I studied in high school'', and I'm sure you did too.  In particular, I put an enormous amount of work into the limit article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, this stuff is entirely in your hands now.  If you have any problems with the math articles, you have the administrative power to delete any articles that you think are inappropriate, like the [[Kolmogorov space]] article.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:57, 4 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, thanks, brother wolf, for exposing your neck so meekly. But I have no desire to be top dog, if you'll excuse me for mixing metaphors. I'm glad you understand and work hard, and I hope you will help me make high school math (and below) accessible to the average reader - not just those in the top 1% like you and me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:47, 5 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must confess that I don't understand your metaphors very much -- brother wolf? exposing my neck?  I'm pretty clueless about contemporary culture.  But I know what &amp;quot;top dog&amp;quot; means.  There's no doubt that you are a top dog, being an administrator.  Also, I'm flattered to be considered in the top 1%, but, remember, there have been a lot of really sharp people here.  So I'm not sure about being in the top 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, good luck, and have fun.  And don't hesitate to delete stuff that you consider inappropriate.  Really.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll come by and look around and say hello from time to time.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:50, 11 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carbon Dioxide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have redone Brenden's edits in a number of different edits. I hope this helps you. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 07:01, 10 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It did. See my subsequent edits. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:23, 12 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Understanding Islam ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for this entry: [[Islam and tolerance]]. I followed the reference link to the news story &amp;quot;The Roots of Muslim rage&amp;quot;, and read the article. I thought it was really interesting, and as I am trying to better understand their beliefs and attitude towards us, (those of Christian faith and in Western Nations) I wanted you to know this was helpful to me, thanks. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:36, 15 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I put the article up for deletion; please contest me on it's talk page. Thanks, [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:29, 5 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I remember posting this thank-you to Ed Poor almost 3 months ago for making the page, as he referenced a very interesting article in the footnotes that helped me to better understand the position of Muslims. I had been trying to gain a better understanding of their point of view, and I found it very helpful. I'm surprised to see it up for deletion, since I don't think &amp;quot;one quote&amp;quot; pages are undesirable, as they often lead me to think more about a subject matter. Sometimes a little quote can lead to learning more about a subject. Why not add a little more information rather than try to delete the page? [[User:Taj|Taj]] 14:32, 6 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of your newer articles need some categories. I don't really know much about subject matter so would probably be better if you do it. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:03, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Feel free to place any category at all, when I'm too rushed to do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:18, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Normally I would, just not to familiar with some of subject matter. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:22, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Christian Chivalry==&lt;br /&gt;
I redirected your article on [[Christian chivalry]] to the already existing page [[Chivalry]] since they're the same concept and the other page was already much more in-depth. Hope that was alright. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:20, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did you complete the merge before reducing the page to a redirect? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:16, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not an admin, I don't think I can do a full merge like that... I figured since it was just a sentence and the sentiment of that sentence was already covered in the other article that the redirect would be sufficient... sorry. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 22:26, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you did your best in good faith, then no apology is needed. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll take a look later on, and if I think that quote is relevant I'll tack it on to [[Chivalry]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:28, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Talk:Gun control#New Infographic]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As you are one of the main contributors to the [[Gun control]] page, I'm writing here to ask you to follow the link I posted in the heading of this section and read the data I found. I think it could be very helpful to the article, but as I said there I'm far from an expert in interpreting that kind of data. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm interested in describing both sides in the [[Firearms debate]]. I don't think we have to overemphasize one side. Put in anything you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==fnarrow's reply to your terms==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just copy and pasting what he sent me, please don't shoot the messenger. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]], I agree to your terms unequivocally and will do everything I can on the future to not allow my emotions to get the better of me in the future. That said, I just want to take a second to point out that 2 of the 6 examples you gave of my behavior, (4 and 5 I believe, i do not have the other page open as I type this email) were not posted by me but were part of a comment posted by another user in response to my comments. The other 4 I do not deny and I agree that they were out of line. To that end, I would like to point out that if you or [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] look at the final interaction between myself and [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] in the &amp;quot;why complaints will go nowhere&amp;quot; section of that same page, you will see that we had settled our differences peacefully. It wasn't until after that that i was banned for earlier statements made in the heat of the moment and out of exasperation regarding the situation at the time they were made. I do not contest the justice of the 1 day block, but when it was immediately followed by the infinite block before I had a chance to respond, apologize or anything else, that was when I felt I had been treated unfairly and asked my friend to join the site as a conduit for contact. (thanks again John!) While I therefore still think the infinite block was unwarranted, i do apologize for my actions and will not allow it to happen again. Thanks for your time and i look forward to helping the site grow from this point forward. --fnarrow&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; btw, I'm not 100# sure what a &amp;quot;sock&amp;quot; is, assure you that to my understanding of the term I am not one. I have neither the time nor the inclination to edit your wiki and only made this account at my friend's request since he had no other contact anyone here. [[User:JSandler|JSandler]] 22:35, 28 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Karajou said I could unblock Fnarrow. I hope this turns out okay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:29, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fnarrow ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you be able to restore Fnarrows user and talk page whilst your at it mate ? [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:30, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:(this is [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]], I'm using [[User:JSandler|John(jsandler)'s]] phone at the moment as my IP is still blocked even though my user page shows that I have been unblocked by [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]]... Can that be fixed?) I wanted to thank everyone for helping me understand what happened and helping me get reinstated. I look forward to working with you all more in the future. Also, as [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] already posted, is it possible to have my user page and talk page content restored? Most of it can be deleted now that issues have been settled, but I'd like to recover other parts. Thanks again, [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]] 14:00, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ed, yes I can post again, I had assumed you had unblocked me... but I guess not based upon your comment on my talk page. Anyway, can you restore the content which was deleted from my user page and talk page? I don't know how to do that... Also, since you're a very knowledgeable Conservative and I consider myself to be a fairly knowledgeable Libertarian I'd be willing to work with you on the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page you created if you're still looking for someone to help with that project. Let me know. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 00:12, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked your username. Someone else seems to have unblocked your IP address; I don't know how to do that.&lt;br /&gt;
I'll leave your user and talk pages as C left them - ask him if he wants them undeleted. I'm just unblocking you, in light of your promise to chill out and be more focused on articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please start the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page, and I'll join in. Thanks! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:41, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we can do that although I am not good with wikis. From what i Understand, Libertarians are conservative when it comes to economics, gun ownership, small government, defence etc but are closer to liberals on other social issues. The way I understand it, libertarians believe the law should protect person and property, but go no further than that. I will do some research in the next few days, write a beta copy and forward to you for review/editing if thats ok&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Excellent, Patmac. I'll add that to the article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:22, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Homosexuality article and General protection idea/proposal  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[homosexuality]] article seems to be a bit broken. The table of contents is in the wrong position. Could you or another sysop please fix this ? Also I had an Idea re article protection. Would it be possible to protect some article so that only those users with '''edit''' and '''sysop''' rights edit them. This would allow those pages to be edited and improved by trusted and known users whilst stopping liberal trolls and thugs pushing their POV and vandalizing them. I think that something like this would help improve the quality and accuracy of the encyclopedia as it would allow for updates, improvements, tweaks and general formatting improvements to be made to our most popular articles [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:45, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For questions about rights (which involve software tweaks), talk to Andy. I can always unprotect an article at least temporarily. But if you want a longterm solution, I'm the wrong man to ask. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Odysseus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You should highlight quotes by including them in apostrophes: see [[Help:How to Code]] for a simple introduction - and follow [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052312&amp;amp;oldid=1052300 this link] for an example.&lt;br /&gt;
*If you include a link to a source just by using simple square brackets (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/odysseus.htm]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), it appears only as a number (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) in the text, similar to footnotes. But unlike those, it isn't listed in the references. To get it listed there, you have to include your link into &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; - tags. (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052314&amp;amp;oldid=1052313 this link] for an example)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 04:31, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps either AugustO or Ed Poor can help me, but other than on recent wikis where the quotation mark and the italic notation can be easily confused, I have never seen italic font used as a stand-alone indication of a block quotation.  I have seen italic used for titles of books or for emphasis or for foreign language words, but not as a replacement for quotation marks.  Any sources for this alternative would be appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 10:56, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:A very good question! Conservapedia states in its [[Conservapedia:Formatting conventions]]:&lt;br /&gt;
::''Italic sections of text are usually used to portion off a portion of text, indicating it is integral to the sentence without being part of its continuation. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:But while wikipedia don't like when you put quotes in italics &lt;br /&gt;
::''For quotations, use only quotation marks (for short quotations) or block quoting (for long ones), not italics. (See Quotations below.) This means that (1) a quotation is not italicized inside quotation marks or a block quote just because it is a quotation, and (2) italics are no substitute for proper quotation formatting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia doesn't address the matters (as far as I could see). Instead, Conservapedia offer some templates which try to do the job.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote}} or {{Q}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This template expects an author, so it can't be used in our special case:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Note how the text gets italicized, and is included in quotation marks: but this template is only used eleven times on this wiki. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote box}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quote box|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox2}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox2|quote=the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|source=John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:''QuoteBox2'' is used ten times on Conservapedia, ''Quotebox'' 422 times, ''Quote box'' only 1 time. Clearly they aren't very popular.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the most popular version, used over 1500 times. &lt;br /&gt;
:My conclusion: &lt;br /&gt;
:#The main feature of a quotation are - surprise, surprise - the quotation marks. Especially for short quotes, they shouldn't be omitted. I haven't used them regularly in the past (see the first quotations in this section), but I'll do so henceforth.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Conservapedia is mute on the use of italics to mark a quote. But perhaps we should follow wikipedia's lead and just don't do so&lt;br /&gt;
:#Indenting via ::: alone is not enough to mark a section as a long quote, at least &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; .. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; should be used - this indents the quote from the left and the right margin. A longer quotation should use one of the templates - best probably &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:Any thoughts? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:50, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My thought is that the last time we discussed a formatting issue, I tried to throw my weight around, and it didn't end on a cheerful note. So why don't I just follow whatever you recommend? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:24, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you.  I just want to say that I have never, ever thought of italics as conveying the limits of a quotation.  I always assumed that someone had put a printout of wiki-marked up text into an OCR scanner and it just got confused between double apostrophes and a quote mark.  I agree with your bottom line. Thanks [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 21:40, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neutral third party's viewpoint sought ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed.  I'd like to get your views on the discussion between another user and me that took place on my talk page.  It looks as if you recently blocked him over another matter.  I think he just tried to bully me for no good reason, but I'd like to hear what a senior admin thinks.  Thanks for weighing in if you get the chance.  [[User:DanAP|DanAP]] 00:14, 18 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I believe RontheDon and Bamorris9 are parodists--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 11:52, 20 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Propositional calculus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started that article.  It's a topic that you have, on several occasions (remember the &amp;quot;wff N proof&amp;quot; game?) expressed an interest in.  I urge you to fill it out.  Though I have a degree in mathematics, I do not know how to explain this topic at a high-school level, and I do not write about topics that I can't explain at a high-school level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also notice no activity on any &amp;quot;sciency&amp;quot; (STEM?) stuff over the last few months, from you or anyone else.  Have you lost interest?  I hope not.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 21:00, 1 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Susan Rice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please help me to expand the article [[Susan E. Rice]]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:29, 6 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I dont know how to put in a Officeholder-template. Can you please do it. Here are all informations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rice --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:32, 11 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edward Snowden ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should read [[Edward Snowden]]. That was my mistake. I might even have heard someone else mispronounce that.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:04, 12 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lukashenko ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please uploud this picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpeg ? Thanks--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 09:18, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For the [[Belarus]] article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No for the [[Alexander Lukashenko]]-article please.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:50, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess you mean [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_%28%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0%29.jpeg this picture.] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:yes and please uploud a picture of [[Nicolas Maduro]]. Like [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Canciller_de_Venezuela_y_Ofrenda_Floral_a_Bol%C3%ADvar_%284%29.jpg this] here--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:25, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:55, 3 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==RE:Categories==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're welcome! - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 12:09, 17 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flags and Coat of Arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud the flags and the coat of arms of the following countries: [[Guinea-Bissau]], [[Republic of China]], [[Benin]], [[Saint Lucia]], [[Saint Vincent and the Grenadines]], [[Ireland]] and [[Fiji]]. I already asked Karajou but he did´nt answered.--07:59, 21 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please uploud them.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:42, 28 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== quick reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a quick reminder. Please put category tags on your new articles. I would also try to have internal links to them from related articles (within articles or the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:04, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Your [[John Mighton]] and [[Learning styles]] articles need category tags and so do some of your most recent articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:11, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I will try to help out and add categories to a few pages in case Dr. Poor is too busy to do this immediately; he can always change the categories if he feels they don't fit. Thanks! [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:35, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservative, you are correct; thanks, Taj, for quickly filling the gap! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:19, 5 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read your article [[Ten year rule]] and it served as further impetus for me to see if this rule of thumb could be shortened via various techniques such as more rapid skill acquisition, improved memorization skills (mnemonics), increasing reading comprehension, time management skills, etc.  I found some additional interesting material on this matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as skill acquisition, a Christian I know came to the United States from Africa and became fluent in English though total immersion in English. He refused to speak his native tongue with his fellow countryman on campus. It worked. He obtained college level English skills within 3 months. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:17, 31 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Completing the square==&lt;br /&gt;
You might want to take a look at that article, and weigh in on whether it is &amp;quot;jargon&amp;quot; or otherwise pitched at an inappropriate level.  Perhaps I should have checked with you ''before'' going off the deep end.  I know that you share my interest in making the math articles accessible to the expected audience.  I believe that the topic of solving quadratic equations, and the quadratic formula, and the derivation of same by &amp;quot;completing the square&amp;quot;, are completely appropriate.  I also believe that the article covers this topic in a completely straightforward way.  (If they had used Hilbert spaces to prove the quadratic formula, that would have been a different matter!)  Anyway, feel free to put the jargon tag back if you think it should be there.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:20, 8 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't have to check with me before writing anything, and thanks for telling me about changes to [[Completing the square]]. I'm always interested in the reading level of articles, as well as any prerequisites a reader must have. The main point is not to be able to say, &amp;quot;All the information is complete and correct.&amp;quot; Rather, it is for the readers to leave here having learned or understood something which is important to them. In other words, it's not about us (&amp;quot;getting graded&amp;quot;) but about them (&amp;quot;getting edified&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:32, 9 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:See &lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic equations]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic formula]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[completing the square]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Hilbert spaces]] - way beyond [[high school math]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Jargon]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Accessibility of math articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikimedia Commons==&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud these images:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/78/Machno.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Rosa_Luxemburg.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Nicolas_Maduro_Moros.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:12, 16 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you please uploud these images also:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/Hassan_Rouhani_2.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:03, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You forgot this one: [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:12, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can you find one with an English title, instead of Russian letters? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:40, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure: [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:28, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:24, 22 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Here are the links again: '''[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG] [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]''' --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 12:15, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=upload&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1 upload log] and tell me which ones you still need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The links that I have posted over you.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:07, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Black man from Brooklyn.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not recall Conservapedia putting the race of the Sandy Hook, Aurora, or Sikh temple shooters on the front page of the website. Why do so this time? [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 12:06, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you think it's not relevant? There's been a lot of [[black on white]] crime lately. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think his blackness is as relevant as the whiteness of the majority of the spree killers in this country. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 22:15, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just went into one of your recent two sentence articles and it didn't have periods after the sentences. If you don't want to put in the effort to write an informative article and can't be bothered to even put periods after your sentences, then please consider not creating any more articles.  Andy just deleted one of our articles that was merely a quote. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe you are capable of writing good articles, but you are choosing to just slap &amp;quot;articles&amp;quot; together instead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are putting category tags on them now so you are taking some additional effort. But you need to put more effort in them if you are going to create them. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:50, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, how about [[Momentum]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:32, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== My response ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for my ill-tempered tone earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, this is what I would suggest and I will explain why below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Use this free tool to make it easy to create 400+ word articles: http://www.wordcounttool.com/ Your article was about 150 words long. This website is competing against other articles for people's attention and so keeping this standard will help this website better compete. Also, if you look at the search engine results, you will generally see the search results are at least 400 words long in length.  For example, see the search results for the word momentum here: [https://www.google.com/search?q=momentum&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high Search results for the word momentum]  and [http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=momentum&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;fr=moz35 More search results for the word momentum]. The articles are significantly over 150 words long. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People want longer articles that are at least 400 words. The search engines know this. That is why these type of articles are in the search engine results. So instead of creating three 150 word articles, write one article that is about 400 words or more. If a wiki has more search engine results, more traffic will be generated. If more traffic is generated, then more people will tend to sign up as editors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try to write articles that show up first in the search engines. Endeavor to do your best when writing an article. The Apostle Paul said, &amp;quot;Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but {only} one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.&amp;quot; (1 Corinthians 9:24).   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. If you use a quote, always cite it as students want a resource they can readily use and their teachers expect them to cite their sources for quotes. Here is a good format to use as it clearly shows the quotations around the quote plus cites the source of the quote: http://www.conservapedia.com/Socialism#Obama_administration_and_land_ownership&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for not responding in anger to my talk page post. I was planning to erase it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:34, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, put an attractive picture on your articles if possible. [[Flipperpithecus|This article]] ranks #1 at a popular search engine for a term as can be seen [https://www.google.com/search?q=flipperpithecus&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high HERE].  It features an attractive picture. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:11, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please review this block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been meaning to write to you about the block of EddyJ, but, first, something else has come up.  I believe that the recent block of DanAP is completely wrong.  He wrote a note [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Depression&amp;amp;diff=1068305&amp;amp;oldid=1068242 here], praising your work over the last six years, and was blocked for it.  I believe his note was sincere (and I happen to agree with it, by the way.)  Please do something about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the main issue is EddyJ.  He has been infinitely blocked, with the note &amp;quot;Ask Ed Poor before reinstating this person.&amp;quot;  I'm baffled by that note.  As you may know, I do extensive research of the people at Conservapedia; their interests; their viewpoints; their editing styles; and what kinds of fights they get into.  He has had some interactions with you, but nothing that would suggest that you have some special interest in his block.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He seems to be something of a hard-luck person in terms of being blocked.  He got blocked by you, by accident, which you retracted and apologized for 2 minutes later.  He got blocked 4 times by Markman, who was a vile character.  (I exchanged some email with Markman after his banishment from CP and RW; he's even more vile than you may realize.)  These blocks were clearly just Markman being destructive, and one was overturned by Andy.  Anyway, his relationship with you seems to be &amp;quot;interesting&amp;quot; but respectful.  (Rather like my relationship with you, or with Daniel Pulido&amp;amp;mdash;a very interesting person.)  His only fight with you was over the &amp;quot;Black man&amp;quot; issue, which I don't consider to have been very serious as fights go.  So please review his case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:06, 16 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Have him submit a [[writing plan]], and I'll discuss the matter with Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:36, 18 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me to expand the article [[Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst]] and dont forget the photos.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 14:07, 20 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== speedy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please look at the [[:Category:Speedy deletion candidates]] and delete some articles there.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 03:26, 16 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beethoven==&lt;br /&gt;
One finds wonderful things in unexpected places.  I happened to see your edit to the Beethoven article, with the reference to the BBC video series.  I've downloaded it.  3 parts.  It's wonderful!  You might also want to look at a similar 3-part series, also by Charles Hazelwood, about Mozart.  Both series are in three parts.  Go to the first one in each case, and you will see links to the other two.  I'd suggest putting all 3 links in the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections of the Beethoven and Mozart pages.  The first Mozart article is at [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrXpzOFknN0]; the other two are linked from there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, I'm not a great fan of putting in seemingly disconnected quotes, and I know other people have criticized you for the same thing.  I'd suggest saying something as a subsection of the line for the 9th, like &amp;quot;One commentator has said the Beethoven's ninth symphony &amp;quot;remains as potent, obsessive, and bewilderingly brilliant as ever&amp;quot;, giving the BBC link.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:21, 29 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5 maintenance tasks that need to be done - some of which could be automated - perhaps you could help as far as the automation of the tasks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some editors like to do wiki maintenance tasks. I started on two of these maintenance task, but I don't have the time to do it all myself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 maintenance task that need to be done: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1.''' De-orphan pages which have no category tags or links to them from other pages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2.''' Remove about 8% of the wiki pages which are ex-editors' user pages and user talk pages who have not edited in the last 3 years.''' And this task could probably be automated, but it could be done manually too.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a list of editors/users here: http://conservapedia.com/Special:ListUsers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you go through the list and put delete page tags on the user pages and user talk pages of users who have been inactive for 3 years, then those pages can be deleted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can also find the pages that need to be deleted by looking at the pages that have these templates on them and then see if the users have been active in the last 3 years: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AUseful+links and http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AWelcome  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3.''' Delete the templates that are never being used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4.''' Build up the 2 sentence stub articles so they have at least 500 words.  Using the random page search function, I estimate the stub articles are at least 30-40% of the wiki articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5.''' Within 10 years, about 50% of links become broken links. Xenu's Link Sleuth can crawl your website and find these dead links plus make a report: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, using this Firefox tool https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/linkchecker/ or this chrome tool https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/link-checker/aibjbgmpmnidnmagaefhmcjhadpffaoi?hl=en these dead links can be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did this link maintenance already for the atheism, evolution and homosexuality articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think these 5 maintenance tasks being done would enhance the user experience for the readers plus these are maintenance tasks that need to be done. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:37, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Automating some of these tasks ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mentioned Xenu's Link Sleuth above in order to help automate spotting the dead links. I think that deleting the the inactive editors who have not edited for 3 years could be automated as well. Maybe using something like [[User:EdBot]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:36, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I was teach math and English   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Master Yoda, welcome back you are! ;-) --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:18, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Call myself senior, I would not! :-) [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:53, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Great to see you again here, Ed!  I look forward to learning more from your edits.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:12, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Can you Help? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed. It's good to see you back. I have been wanting to join the [[Creationwiki]] and [[Citizendium]] encyclopedia projects. I recognized your name on both sites. Last year I asked on your talk page but you were away at the time. Now that you are back, can you tell me how can I get an account for [[Citizendium]]? There is a [[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:RequestAccount| forum for registering]] but they are testing it, and I do not want to give away my info without receiving my account. So, how can I request an account where I will be assured of receiving it? And, how do I get a [[Creationwiki]] account? I requested once, but I got no confirmation email either in my inbox or spam folder. It appears that Hotmail has problems. I don't think I will be requesting either at present, but when I am ready, how can I request without having to wait? [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I would like to tell you that I will still edit Conservapedia even after I join the above sites. I just will edit them in addition. I originally edited [[Wikipedia]], but I have left because I could not agree with the viewpoints there. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, I don't know anything about that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:10, 16 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== small request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, could you please put category tags on your new articles. For example, this article [[Rudd Weatherwax]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:26, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Category tags, got it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::re Category:Animal trainers, Category:Dog trainers, Category:American male film actors: [[Conservapedia:Editing_article_and_talk_pages#Categories|Unlike articles, categories are to be in title case (e.g. Australian Cities and Towns, not Australian cities and towns), and are to be plural where applicable.]] --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The recursion joke ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was used in Donald Knuth's ''The Art of Computer Programming'' in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And hello again!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to keep the math and science stuff from going off the deep end over the last couple of years.  Not really hard; you and I seem to have scared off the flamers pretty well.  But something came up very recently, that you might want to look at.  See the quadrupole stuff in [[Gravitational waves]].  It's beyond me, and I'm way too busy fighting lower-level battles at present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:24, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, Sam, I'm going to stick to the K-12 curriculum. That's what I know best. But it's great to be back! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Internet Explorer]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed. Years ago you had the article on [[Internet Explorer]] removed due to its poor sourcing, or, I am not sure what, but it is still on the talkpage. I have recreated the article with a screenshot at the side. I have posted this message to ask if you would like to help in developing the article. I am not very good at finding sources or researching, although I do what I can. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 23:01, 24 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet_Explorer&amp;amp;direction=prev&amp;amp;oldid=903283 this version] doesn't seem so bad - after 4 or 5 years. Do as you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:58, 28 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you. I have restored to that version, but retained the screenshot and the category of Internet. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 19:44, 29 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bots==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello!  As I mentioned on [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Bots_.28and_other_web_services_and_resources.29|Mr. Schlafly's talk page]], I was wondering about the possibility of trying to help CP by running a bot.  I have a limited understanding of PHP and this kind of bot, but am fairly tech savvy and have created and used other sorts of bots on occasion.  [[User:JDano|JDano]] mentioned that you are the only person of CP who has successfully set up a bot, so I just thought I would ask you what you think.  It seems to me this would be a nice thing to do, but I'm not exactly sure how to proceed.  I'm also unsure of whether Mr. Schlafly would approve of me trying this, and whether it would even work, or if this wouldn't work with the permissions level I have here.  I have a stable web server and a slightly less stable private server.  Any thoughts?  Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 15:23, 12 April 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you haven't disappeared, I might point out that my bot only worked with a previous version of MediaWiki. Let me know if you're still interested. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:44, 19 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm still here, and thanks for getting back to me!  I am also still interested, though I'm uncertain if:&lt;br /&gt;
#I am able to do this&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If I'm allowed to run a bot, since I'm not an admin&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If bots are even allowed on CP--someone thought they were altogether disallowed.&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If there is a sufficient need to a for for me to bother (and also bother others, like you)&lt;br /&gt;
::That is annoying that your bot isn't compatible with the update, but is there a way to take your basic code and put it into a new &amp;quot;adaption&amp;quot; framework?  As far as my own attempt, I'm finding a number of off-the-shelf &amp;quot;bots&amp;quot; which are freely available, but pre-configured for Wikipedia.  I don't know if they could be used or not, but it might be an option. Do you have any other thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 00:16, 20 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since my last post, I have gotten a few answers to my questions.  I also now have a working [[User:DavidB4-bot|batch edit bot]].  It has a lot of limitations and a few bugs, but it's a start.  I would like it if one of use could get a sort of vandalism reduction/reversion bot working, as you previously had.  I in no way want to steal the task from you, but if you can't get something like this working, I would appreciate some guidance as to what previously worked and how it failed.  In any case, I would very much like an improved edit bot, as what I have now is a simple, static cue of batch tasks to execute, either once or recursively. This is proving useful, but not as useful as I would like.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I deleted my user page, but still appears in the history. Please help me delete my pages at conservapedia.com and my conservapedia.com account. Please delete them.  (data-provider)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Merry Christmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Merry Christmas.gif|cebter|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merry Christmas!  And have a happy New Year's Day. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:49, 24 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Talmud and &amp;quot;taking things out of context&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I'm no anti-Semite. I may have my issues with the Talmud, but it strictly has to deal with how they treated God (not even Jesus, just God himself). And I would still fight to the death to protect Judaism and Israel itself especially from the likes of Islam, Stormfront, the KKK and the like. The types of Jews I do have immense respect for are the ones who adhere to the Torah only, or at least primarily.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second of all, surely you must have seen the parts in those quotes that specifically state where those quotes came from. And for the record, there were a few Jewish people who confirmed a lot of what was said in those quotes from the Talmud. Case in point: https://youtu.be/YSy6ENVAJlY And there was one person who converted to Christianity and testified what was in the Talmud. For example, Bernard Lazare, a French Jew who upon converting testified the Talmud's role in the Jewish revolts and also what actually was said in the Talmud.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third of all, I get enraged whenever someone claims I took something &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot;, and in fact am enraged with the phrase itself, because I only see it as an excuse to cover up bad things, like when people claim that Lenin took Marx &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot; when he did those evil things even when those were exactly the stuff Marx demanded that Communism should be done in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I used to naively believe that the Talmud was part of God's design, that the Jews still worshipped God even if they don't worship Jesus himself, but they don't, they if anything make him more like a plaything, and that I will NOT tolerate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:14, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, try to get a handle on your rage and focus your efforts on improving articles. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:21, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not actually enraged, or at least, I'm keeping a pretty tight lid on my rage, so I am getting quite a bit of a handle on my rage actually. Didn't resort to name calling. Anyways, I reverted your edit, because, 1., those quotes have been verified by countless people, some of whom were Rabbis themselves, and 2., if you really wanted to address that bit, you should have responded to it directly, not removed it. I also added your reply back in, though I had to change it slightly since, due to the quotes still being there, it wouldn't make sense to mention you removed the quotes. And again, those quotes weren't taken out of context, as even Yossi Gurvitz and Bernard Lazare verified those quotes were accurate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:24, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest you get back to what we were doing before you supplied all those Talmud quotes. Wasn't it something to do with Trump and a so-called &amp;quot;[[Muslim registry]]&amp;quot;? I could use some help with that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine, I'll help with that, as long as you stop taking those quotes out. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:28, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can appeal your block to Andy, Conservative, or any other admin. But issuing ultimatums and refusing alternatives is not a part of collaborative editing. Bye! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't making an ultimatum, nor was I refusing alternatives (if anything, I actually DID try to compromise by letting you retain your response while still keeping the quotes). Ironically, I WAS about to make a contribution to the Muslim Registry article when you blocked me. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 16:58, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sigh. You're right. I guess I was too hasty: no one else at Conservapedia whose opinion I value agreed with your block!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Forgive me? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009.  It is now registered and somewhat set up.  I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel.  Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering.  In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later.  If you are interested, please let me know!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:46, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you could implement this project, that would be excellent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable?  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The blue links on a dark red background is hard to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sorry for the late reply - I haven't been checking CP every day. Here is how to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 turn off] the background on the useful links, and here is how I [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 made the background light yellow]. Hope it helps. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:56, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, some people have started to edit Conservapedia and then quickly gave up because they didn't know how to edit a wiki.  I noted about 3 people who did this. There are probably many more who quit but didn't say anything. I added a link entitled &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot;.  But I believe there are various versions of the welcome template so my link is not on all welcome template versions. For example, the welcome template that JPatt uses didn't incorporate my &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot; link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the newest version of the Wikimedia software allow for WYSIWYG editing? In other words &amp;quot;What you see is what you get&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The newest version of the Wikimedia software does not have the counter at the bottom of the pages. I understand why Andy Schlafly likes the counters at the bottom. I like the counters too. I guess there might be an extension to add the counters to the newest version of Wikimedia. But after all is said and done, having WYSIWYG editing could greatly increase the participation rate at this wiki and lower the rate of people falling out because they don't know how to edit a wiki. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:40, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==== Here is the welcome to Wikipedia and it is much better and legible ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Plate of cookies.jpg|thumb|300px|Some cookies to welcome you! [[File:Face-smile.svg|25px]]]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]], Conservative! I am [[User:This lousy T-shirt|This lousy T-shirt]] and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Knox490|your contributions]]. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], or feel free to leave me a message on [[User talk:This lousy T-shirt|my talk page]] or type ''{{tl|helpme}}'' at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message!  I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Help:Contents|Help pages]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Article development|How to write a great article]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ten_Simple_Rules_for_Editing_Wikipedia Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia].&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Also, when you post on [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] you should [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] using four tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.  Again, welcome!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Conservapedia needs a better greeting. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:02, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks Ed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:05, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:37, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Done, but you've been around long enough. Why don't you ask Andy for blocking rights? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:39, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm confident he would use block right appropriately, but Andy might be hesitant to give the privilege to Sam.  Sam has been in a number of disputes, and has been banned a few times as well.  I'd support Sam getting the privilege, (I'd say he's more than earned it since I've been here alone, nevermind all the time before that) but I don't know if it could happen. Besides, aren't privileges generally given, not requested? --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:09, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::David, you have hit the nail right on the head.  Blocking rights are given, not requested.  And my long career here is full of blocks (19 of them), including blocks by people who were later revealed to be vandals or parodists:  DanielPulido and the notorious Markman.  And illicit blocks by &amp;quot;assistants&amp;quot; over content disputes.  (I seem to have a knack for upsetting bullies.)  And several blocks by my friend Conservative; we get along much better now.  And two by Ed Poor himself; I think we get along much better now; I won't bore you with the details.  When you've been around as long as I have, you develop a history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no interest in getting any special powers.  I like to think of myself as a &amp;quot;conscientious objector&amp;quot; in these wars.  People know that if they wrongly block me, I can't and won't fight back.  But others will (hopefully) undo the damage.  I think a lot of people respect me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But when big vandal attacks come along, and I can't get anyone else to take action, that's when I wish I had block powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you for your kind words.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::SamHB, you brought those blocks (none of which were &amp;quot;illicit&amp;quot; like you claim) down on yourself for the exact reasons DavidB4 pointed out, as well as for repeatedly and insistently putting liberal POV into some articles (including even now, with the [[fake news]] article two days ago) and for provoking fights (also including now). If you didn't insist on trying to turn Conservapedia into Liberalpedia, you wouldn't get chastized by the admins as much as you do. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It's true that I've had a hair-trigger for blocks, but you might not know that I often agonize over these and consult Andy by private email afterwards. It's not easy to admit that I've overstepped, but my record shows that I have SOMETIMES unblocked someone after a few moments (or days?) of reflection. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:31, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unrelated to what's above, Ed Poor, I see that several of your recent blocks have been indefinite. I used to do this a lot, but I no longer do because it can cause many innocent people to lose access to CP. Oftentimes, IP addresses get shifted around, so different, unrelated people end up using the same address at different times. That means that one indefinite block could affect many people over time. Also, vandals don't tend to be the type of people in a perminent location, so it is unlikely they will be using the same IP address after some time even if the address is the same in the same location. I recommend five-year blocks instead with even shorter blocks necessary for less serious vandalism. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;amp;diff=1304184&amp;amp;oldid=1303142 DavidB4 explained it better on my talk page.] Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:40, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== WOTUS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is [[Waters of the United States rule]] and [[Clean Water Rule]] the same thing? If so, they should be merged. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:48, 1 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The articles should be merged, although the two rules are slightly different. Can you do it? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:38, 2 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are many rules implementing the Clean Water Act.  Shouldn't you just have one comprehensive article about the Clean Water Act?  Also, we should have a separate article about the definition of &amp;quot;Navigatable Waters of the United States&amp;quot;, because this term defines federal jurisdiction in contexts beyond just the Clean Water Act.  It also defines the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers and the  old Federal Power Commission (now  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) with respect to the licensing of hydroelectric projects. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 04:54, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no objection, as long as readers will be able to understand what each of those hot-button phrases means, politically:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Navigable waters of the United States]] has nothing to do with navigation or shipping. It's merely a compromise between polluters and farmers on the one hand, and clean-water freaks or preservationists on the other. &lt;br /&gt;
:::*Similarly, the [[Clean Water Rule]] is not mostly about clean drinking water for people, but it also restricts legitimate (farm) use and delights the [[no-use]] environmental lobby&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The [[WOTUS]] rule is a variation on the Clean Water Rule that isn't so tough on farmers filling in a swamp (see [[Wetlands]]) to get more crop land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you two can make one article out of all this mess, go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi Uncle Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I'm finally here. I would love to get in touch with you again. You are a wonderful person, always very friendly. --[[User:Annie Poor|Annie Poor]] ([[User talk:Annie Poor|talk]]) 13:10, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Great to see you! ==&lt;br /&gt;
Great to see you, Ed!  Hope all is well.  It's fantastic to see a longtime friend again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:42, September 20, 2022 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi dear Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God bless you Ed Poor.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RobS is actually againt this LT behavior. &lt;br /&gt;
It's LT who blames Jews for Hitler, not RobS.&lt;br /&gt;
This is about LT, he just pasted it all from his talk page on to here.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:38, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice quotes on leadership on your user page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked the quotes on leadership that are on your user page.  I copied them to this page:  [[User:Conservative/Quotes]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:56, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hooray!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
You made my day, Ed!!!  So good to see you again.  I have the good memory of attending a certain college speech with you and others perhaps a decade ago.  So glad you're still active!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:57, October 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Larry Sanger==&lt;br /&gt;
I note you have good things to say about [[Larry Sanger]] who has professed his belief in [[Christianity]] in recent years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]] made the assertion that Larry Sanger was an [[atheist]] (totally untrue) and either [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=2070366&amp;amp;oldid=1976745 condoned or was a practitioner of bestiality] which was repeated in [https://therightscoop.com/why-should-a-conservative-bother-using-wikipedia/ conservative media]. After Sanger's conversion from [[agnosticism]] to Christianity I cleaned up the Wikipedia page and at least a half dozen other pages User:Conservative copy pasted his [[spam]] into. But he steadfastly refuses to clean up at least 342 other pages with his assertions, nor change his editing habits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:21, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Two decades ago, Larry said he was an atheist, but I never held that against him, particularly because I was at the time an active member in the most unpopular new religion in America. Both he and Jimbo Wales supported me as a preeminent expositor of &amp;quot;neutrality&amp;quot;. If there is anything that needs to be cleaned up, post it here or email me at uncle_ed_poor@yahoo.com. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:29, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Woman pilot accused of being a DEI hire ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Re: Woman helicopter pilot accused of being a DEI hire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;According to research and data, there is no significant difference in piloting ability between women and men, meaning women pilots can be just as good as male pilots when considering skill and competence; studies have shown that when factors like experience are controlled for, accident rates between genders are largely comparable.&amp;quot;[https://www.google.com/search?q=are+women+pilots+as+good+as+men&amp;amp;oq=are+woman+pilots+as+goo&amp;amp;gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCAgBEAAYFhgeMgYIABBFGDkyCAgBEAAYFhgeMggIAhAAGBYYHjIICAMQABgWGB4yCAgEEAAYFhgeMg0IBRAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBhAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBxAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMgcICBAAGO8FMgYICRAuGEDSAQkxNDY5NGowajGoAgCwAgA&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But there is a long tradition of blaming women for calamity and incompetence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. &amp;quot;Women driver&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Adam blamed Eve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. I am waiting for FAA to give their ruling and I am not pre-judging matters. I haven't been following this news story closely. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this clarifies matters. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:53, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think the executive branch criticism was for her being a woman - but for being inexperienced, and pushed into a job to fill a DEI quota. I'll try to follow up on that. Anyway, the DEI controversy is a major part of the story. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:58, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I just saw a news report at: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmpkoJhqUP8 FAA Academy struggled to fill classes over DEI quotas: Sen. Mullin]. The claim is that at the time of one of the recent crashes, the air traffic control tower was understaffed. This news report indicated that when you have DEI what happens sometimes is that a significant portion of jobs become not filled because they are looking for a DEI hire with the requisite skills to do the job when there are non DEI applicants who could do the job and are not hired. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:11, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I think that is the Trump Administration argument. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:41, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Speaking of focusing on DEI over competency: &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The DNC Leader interrupted the party election to tell members that not enough non-binary candidates have been elected, so they MUST now vote for one.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/behizytweets/status/1885836927112552800 per this][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:46, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::From what I have heard so far, the planes usually come down a certain runway which I will call Runway A.  But the plane that was in the crash was coming down Runway B.  From what I understand, the pilot accidentally left out the information that the plane was coming down Runway B. On top of this, light pollution caused the helicopter pilot to probably not see the plane. And from what I understand, the air traffic tower was understaffed and that may have contributed to the air traffic controller mistake. On top of this, Trump is claiming that the helicopter was flying at an inappropriate altitude. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But like I said, I am not pre-judging things. I will reserve judgement until the FAA makes its ruling. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:51, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Telling, you might find this interesting: [[Prevalence of homosexuality going down in cultures that become more conservative]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:54, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* Guys, Remember this dreadful non answer by KBJ in Mar 2022?[https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2022/3/video-release-judge-jackson-cannot-define-woman-during-blackburn-scotus-day-two-hearing-remarks] [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])•&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Reagan National, ATC routinely asks pilots if they can land on the shorter runway (change from runway 1 to runway 33). Helicopter pilots SHOULD know this. If not, why not? Especially if they are TRAINING for a crucially important emergency flight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, they know (if they are bright enough to pound sand) that they will be crossing the flight path of landing airplanes. Wouldn't it make sense to be darn sure they aren't going to collide with any of them? (Not just the one that ATC &amp;quot;mentions&amp;quot;?) The best way to avoid a collision with another aircraft is to be NOT at the same altitude. Helicopters can fly safely between 50 and 200 feet off the ground, even at night.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
100% pilot error, Captain Rebecca Lobach, out of [[Davison Army Airfield]] in [[Fairfax County, Virginia]]. My condolences to your family. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:53, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Great to see you again, Ed! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, great to see you again, and thanks for your terrific edits!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 00:30, July 9, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sometimes it takes 5 or 10 minutes to get a page to load - I don't know if it's my wifi or what. That's the main reason I've been away so much. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:55, July 9, 2026 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rape_jihad&amp;diff=2199000</id>
		<title>Rape jihad</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Rape_jihad&amp;diff=2199000"/>
		<updated>2026-07-09T03:48:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: spelling: objective of jihad&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Islamic slave trade.jpg|right|300px|thumb|The capture and enslavement of women has long been the objective of jihad.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Rape jihad''' (Arabic: تحرش جنسي, ''taharrush jinsi''; [[sexual harassment]]) refers to the organized abduction, rape and/or enslavement of non-Muslim women or children&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kern&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3846/britain-child-grooming|title=Britain: &amp;quot;Rape Jihad&amp;quot; Against Children|last=Kern|first=Soeren|date=11 July 2013|publisher=Gatestone Institute|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by adherents of [[Islam]]. The term was used as early as 2004 in descriptions of Darfur and [Beslan,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;spencer24092004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=11278|title=The Rape Jihad|last=Spencer|first=Robert|authorlink=[[Robert Spencer]] (author)|date=24 September 2004|publisher=FrontPageMagazine.com|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and has since been applied to more recent incidents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.issafrica.org/iss-today/sexual-terrorism-in-africa-a-case-of-two-crimes-in-one|title=Sexual terrorism in Africa: a case of two crimes in one|last=Salifu|first=Uyo|date=2 October 2013|publisher=Institute for Security Studies|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.afternoonvoice.com/after-love-jihad-now-rape-jihad.html|title=After love jihad, now rape jihad|date=17 October 2014|work=Afternoon Voice|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;greenfield&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/rape-jihad-inside-isis-harem-for-captured-non-muslim-women/|title=Rape Jihad: Inside ISIS’ Harem for Captured Non-Muslim Women|last=Greenfield|first=Daniel|date=28 August 2014|publisher=FrontPageMag.com|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=|title=Perfect Enemy: The Law Enforcement Manual of Islamist Terrorism|author=Dean T. Olson|page=176|isbn=978-0-398-07885-0|publisher=Charles C Thomas Publisher LTD|date=2009|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=|title=Islamic Violence in America's Streets|author=Ronald K. Pierce|page=92|isbn=978-1-49173-681-4|publisher=iUniverse|date=2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The largest case of rape jihad in [[Europe]] was at New Years Evening 2015 in [[Cologne]], [[Germany]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Justification ==&lt;br /&gt;
It has been claimed that disparaging attitudes toward non-Muslim women and girls are promoted in some [[mosque]]s&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dixon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|last1=Dixon|first1=Hayley|title=‘Imams promote grooming rings’, Muslim leader claims|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10061217/Imams-promote-grooming-rings-Muslim-leader-claims.html |publisher=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|date=16 May 2013|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that sexual predation of them is supported in religious text&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;McLoughlin&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|last1=McLoughlin|first1=Peter|title=&amp;quot;Easy Meat&amp;quot;: Multiculturalism, Islam and Child Sex Slavery|url=http://lawandfreedomfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Easy-Meat-Multiculturalism-Islam-and-Child-Sex-Slavery-05-03-2014.pdf |pages=222–258|publisher=Law and Freedom Foundation|date=March 2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a form of [[sexual slavery]] sanctioned in [[Koran]]ic texts, such as ''[[surah|suras]]'' 4:24 and 33:50, in which sex is permitted with ''&amp;quot;Ma malakat aymanukum&amp;quot;'' (captive women).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mccarthy&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/391814/isis-and-rape-jihad-andrew-c-mccarthy|title=ISIS and the Rape Jihad|last=McCarthy|first=Andrew|authorlink=Andrew C. McCarthy|date=3 November 2014|publisher=National Review Online|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In its digital magazine, ''Dabiq'', the [[Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant]] (ISIL) explicitly claimed &amp;quot;religious&amp;quot; justification for enslaving Yazidi women (see section following). Specifically, ISIL argued that the Yazidi were idol worshipers and appealed to the [[shariah]] practice of spoils of war.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|title=Islamic State Seeks to Justify Enslaving Yazidi Women and Girls in Iraq|url=http://www.newsweek.com/islamic-state-seeks-justify-enslaving-yazidi-women-and-girls-iraq-277100 |accessdate=|work=Newsweek|agency=Reuters|date=13 October 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Athena Yenko, [http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/569402/20141013/islamic-state-dabiq-magazine-isis-slavery.htm#.VD7r9EnD_Gg &amp;quot;Judgment Day Justifies Sex Slavery Of Women – ISIS Out With Its 4th Edition Of Dabiq Magazine&amp;quot;] ''International Business Times-Australia'', October 13, 2014{{dead link|date=April 2015}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Allen McDuffee, [https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/10/isis-confirms-and-justifies-enslaving-yazidis-in-new-magazine-article/381394/ &amp;quot;ISIS Is Now Bragging About Enslaving Women and Children,&amp;quot;] ''[[The Atlantic]]'', Oct 13 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Abdelaziz - ISIS States Justification&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|last=Abdelaziz|first=Salma|title=ISIS states its justification for the enslavement of women|url=https://www.cnn.com/2014/10/12/world/meast/isis-justification-slavery |publisher=[[CNN]]|date=13 October 2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|last=Spencer|first=Richard|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/islamic-state/11158797/Thousands-of-Yazidi-women-sold-as-sex-slaves-for-theological-reasons-says-Isil.html|title=Thousands of Yazidi women sold as sex slaves 'for theological reasons', says Isil|date=13 October 2014|work=The Telegraph|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21625870-jihadists-boast-selling-captive-women-concubines-have-and-hold &amp;quot;To have and to hold: Jihadists boast of selling captive women as concubines,&amp;quot;] ''[[The Economist]]'', Oct 18th 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;By AFP, [http://english.alarabiya.net/en/perspective/features/2014/10/13/ISIS-declares-return-of-slavery-.html &amp;quot;ISIS jihadists boast of enslaving Yazidi women,&amp;quot;] ''Al Arabiya'', October 13, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ISIL asserts that certain [[Hadith]] and [[Quran]]ic verses support their right to enslave and rape captive non-Muslim women.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Abdelaziz - ISIS States Justification&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kumar&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|last=Kumar|first=Anugrah|title=ISIS Claims Islam Justifies Making 'Infidel' Women Sex Slaves|url=http://www.christianpost.com/news/isis-claims-islam-justifies-making-infidel-women-sex-slaves-128004|agency=CHRISTIAN POST CONTRIBUTOR|work=[[The Christian Post]]|date=13 October 2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Sypher - Rape&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|last= Sypher|first= Ford|title= Rape and Sexual Slavery Inside an ISIS Prison|url= https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/28/rape-and-sexual-slavery-inside-an-isis-prison.html|agency=Horror|work=[[The Daily Beast]]|date= 28 August 2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ISIL appealed to apocalyptic beliefs and &amp;quot;claimed justification by a Hadith that they interpret as portraying the revival of slavery as a precursor to the end of the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nour Malas, [http://online.wsj.com/articles/ancient-prophecies-motivate-islamic-state-militants-1416357441 &amp;quot;Ancient Prophecies Motivate Islamic State Militants: Battlefield Strategies Driven by 1,400-year-old Apocalyptic Ideas,&amp;quot;] ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'',  November 18, 2014 (accessed November 22, 2014){{subscription required}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to ''Dabiq,'' &amp;quot;enslaving the families of the kuffar and taking their women as concubines is a firmly established aspect of the Sharia’s that if one were to deny or mock, he would be denying or mocking the verses of the Qur'an and the narration of the Prophet … and thereby apostatizing from Islam.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kumar&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;TZ - 10-14-2014&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|title= ISIL seeks to justify enslaving Yazidi women and girls in Iraq|url= http://www.todayszaman.com/national_isil-seeks-to-justify-enslaving-yazidi-women-and-girls-in-iraq_361547.html |agency=abril|publisher=''Today's Zaman''|date=14 October 2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In late 2014 ISIL released a pamphlet that focused on the treatment of female slaves.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Smith - ISIS Publish Pamphlet&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Amelia Smith, [http://www.newsweek.com/isis-release-questions-and-answers-pamphlet-how-treat-female-slaves-290511 &amp;quot;ISIS Publish Pamphlet On How to Treat Female Slaves,&amp;quot;] ''[[Newsweek]]'', 12/9/2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Our faith condones&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Lackey - Pamphlet provides guidelines&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Katharine Lackey, [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/12/13/pamphlet-islamic-state-guidelines-sex-slaves/20359049/ &amp;quot;Pamphlet provides Islamic State guidelines for sex slaves,&amp;quot;] ''[[USA Today]]'', December 13, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It says fighters are allowed to have sex with adolescent girls and to beat slaves as discipline. The pamphlet's guidelines also allow fighters to trade slaves, including for sex, as long as they have not been impregnated by their owner.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Smith - ISIS Publish Pamphlet&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Our faith condones&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|title=Our faith condones raping underage slaves: ISIS publishes shocking guidebook telling fighters how to buy, sell and abuse captured women|url=https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2872884/Our-faith-condones-raping-underage-slaves-ISIS-publishes-shocking-guidebook-telling-fighters-buy-sell-abuse-captured-women.html|author=Abul Taher|work=[[Daily Mail]]|date=13 December 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Lackey - Pamphlet provides guidelines&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent times, those who engage in rape jihad justify and excuse their actions by viewing their victims as little more than &amp;quot;pieces of meat&amp;quot; and by disparaging them and making false claims about their victims' virtue, claiming that their victims &amp;quot;asked for it&amp;quot; even though they did not.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Islam fantasies&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/05/islams_sexual_fantasies_.html Islam’s Sexual Fantasies] at the American Thinker&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rape in war==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Jihadism|}}&lt;br /&gt;
===History===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rape has accompanied warfare in virtually every known historical era.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book |last= Levinson |first=Bernard M |title= Gender and Law in the Hebrew Bible and the Ancient Near East |url=https://books.google.com/?id=2rZnXQwPX8gC&amp;amp;dq=rape+in+warfare+ancient |page= 203 |year=2004 |isbn= 978-0-567-08098-1}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mass rape of both women or youths regardless of gender was among the punitive measures that might be taken against captured towns by [[Ancient Greece|Greek]], [[Persian Empire|Persian]], or [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] troops.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;On ancient Rome, see Sara Elise Phang, ''Roman Military Service: Ideologies of Discipline in the Late Republic and Early Principate'' (Cambridge University Press, 2008),  pp. 244, 253–254, 267–268 ''et passim''. See also Sex in the Roman military.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Female slavery and war rapes were also common during the medieval [[Arab slave trade]], where prisoners of war captured in battle from non-Arab lands often ended up as concubine slaves (who are considered free when their master dies).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/slavery_1.shtml#section_7 |title=Islam and slavery: Sexual slavery |publisher=Bbc.co.uk |date= |accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Islamic Golden Age]], some Muslim jurists writing on military jurisprudence advocated severe penalties for rebels who use &amp;quot;stealth attacks&amp;quot; and practice [[kidnapping|abductions]], poisoning of water wells, [[arson]], attacks against wayfarers and travellers, [[assault]]s under the cover of night and [[rape]].&amp;lt;ref name = Fadl&amp;gt;Abou El Fadl, Khaled. [Commentary: Terrorism Is at Odds With Islamic Tradition]. Muslim Lawyers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lieber Code of 1863 codified the protection of civilians and stated that &amp;quot;all rape...[is] prohibited under the penalty of death&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Askin_35_36&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{harvp|Askin|1997|pp=35–36}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and subsequent laws of war and humanitarian law have made maltreatment of civilians criminal.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;black book&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nicolas Werth, Karel Bartošek, Jean-Louis Panné, Jean-Louis Margolin, Andrzej Paczkowski, Stéphane Courtois, ''[[The Black Book of Communism]]: Crimes, Terror, Repression'', Harvard University Press, 1999, hardcover, 858 pages, ISBN 0-674-07608-7, page 5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Slavery was formally abolished in nearly all countries by the mid 20th century,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murray Gordon. 'Slavery in the Arab World', New York: New Amsterdam, 1989, p. 234.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4091579.stm | work=BBC News | title=Slavery: Mauritania's best kept secret | date=December 13, 2004 | accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though in the 21st century some Muslim scholars&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Khaled Abou El Fadl and William Clarence-Smith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; have expressed concern at a &amp;quot;worrying trend&amp;quot; of conservative [[Salafi]] Islamic scholars &amp;quot;reopening&amp;quot; the issue of slavery after its &amp;quot;closing&amp;quot; earlier in the 20th century when Muslim countries banned slavery and &amp;quot;most Muslim scholars&amp;quot; found the practice &amp;quot;inconsistent with Qur'anic morality.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Abou el Fadl, ''Great Theft'', HarperSanFrancisco, c2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/economicHistory/GEHN/GEHNPDF/Islam&amp;amp;SlaveryWGCS.pdf &amp;quot;Islam and Slavery&amp;quot;, William G. Clarence-Smith]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Siege of Vienna===&lt;br /&gt;
During the Siege of Vienna of 1683 historical accounts report men were slaughtered by Turkish Muslims and women raped.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/under-marys-holy-name-victory-in-vienna-september-12-1683&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===1971 Bangladesh Liberation War===&lt;br /&gt;
An estimated 400,000 Bangladeshi women were raped by the Pakistani Army during the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War. Most of the rape victims were Hindu women. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bartrop, Paul R.; Jacobs, Steven Leonard (2014). Modern Genocide: The Definitive Resource and Document Collection [4 volumes]: The Definitive Resource and Document Collection&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;D'Costa, Bina (2011). Nation-building, Gender and War Crimes in South Asia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===ISIL===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See:'' [[Iraq insurgency]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014, the ISIL raided Yazidi settlements in [[Iraq]], massacring the men and selling the women into sexual slavery.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Greenfield&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|last=Greenfield|first=Daniel |title=Rape Jihad: Inside ISIS’ Harem for Captured Non-Muslim Women|url=http://www.jewishvoiceny.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;view=article&amp;amp;id=8449:rape-jihad-inside-isis-harem-for-captured-non-muslim-women&amp;amp;catid=125:iranian-threat&amp;amp;Itemid=331|agency=|work=Jewish Voice|date=3 September 2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amidst news that ISIL executed 19 girls&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3186229/ISIS-executes-19-girls-refusing-sex-fighters-envoy-reveals-sex-slaves-peddled-like-barrels-petrol.html ''MailOnline:'' ISIS executes 19 girls for refusing to have sex with fighters as UN envoy reveals how sex slaves are 'peddled like barrels of petrol']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the following document was revealed - a translation&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; A translated version of the document was shared online by humanitarian and peace prize winner Dr Widad Akrawi. (PDF [https://jgjpp.regent.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ISIS-NEW-CALIPHATE-SELLS-AND-ENSLAVES-WOMEN.pdf])&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of an actual, UN-verified&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-08-03/sex-slaves-sold-by-islamic-state-the-younger-the-better ''Bloomberg:'' Islamic State Circulates Sex Slave Price List]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; DAESH &amp;quot;pricing menu&amp;quot; aimed at discerning militant shoppers on the lookout for additional rape-slaves;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|We have received news that the demand in Women and Cattle market has sharply decreased and that will affect Islamic State revenues as well as the funding of mujahideen in the battlefield, therefore we have made some changes. Below are the prices for Yazidi and Christian women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The price for Yazidi or Christian women between the age of 40 - 50 is $43 (£27)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
$75 (£48) for 30 to 40-year-olds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
$86 (£55) for 20 to 30-year-olds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
$130 (£83) for ten to 20-year-olds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
$172 (£110) for one to nine-year-olds&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Customers are allowed to purchase only three items with the exception of customers from Turkey, Syria and Gulf countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dated and sealed by ISIS in Iraq October 16, 2014.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Buyers beware of your rights (&amp;quot;only three items per customer!&amp;quot;) as the document contains no money back or return policy for &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;if&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; when these women have been driven past the point of self-mutilation and suicide. The DAESH clerical promise that [[Allah]] condones this practice will simply &amp;quot;have to do&amp;quot; in terms of additional benefits for the poor militants.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nigerian girls.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Hillary Clinton did nothing to protect the lives and safety of 276 Christian girls kidnapped by Boko Haram and sold as sex slaves, despite multiple agency requests. The Obama administration furnished the same organization SAM-7 missiles capable of shooting down commercial and military aircraft.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/libyan-missiles-on-the-loose/2012/05/08/gIQA1FCUBU_story.html?utm_term=.a091217ed1fd Libyan missiles on the loose], By [[David Ignatius]], Washington Post Opinion writer, May 8, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although the above document was verified by a senior UN official, blogger and the Middle East Forum fellow Aymenn Jawad Al-Tamimi argued that the document may be a forgery.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aymennjawad.org/2015/12/guide-to-islamic-state-document-hoaxes Guide to Islamic State Document Hoaxes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Yazidi rights activist Nadia Murad gave a first-person account of gang rape (euphemistically called &amp;quot;sexual jihad&amp;quot;) and of women and girls as young as 10-years old being sold as sex slaves.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35687900 Yazidi activist: My escape from 'Islamic State'] by Sarah Montague (29 February 2016) ''BBC''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Boko Haram ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2014, during a raid on Chibok, [[Boko Haram]], an Islamic Jihadist and terrorist organization based in northeast [[Nigeria]], took prisoner several hundred Christian schoolgirls, who, after efforts to secure their release were ineffective, were sold in slave auctions to prospective husbands and forcibly converted to Islam.&amp;lt;ref name=csmonitor1&amp;gt;{{cite news|author=Howard LaFranchi|url=https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Foreign-Policy/2014/0505/What-role-for-US-in-efforts-to-rescue-Nigeria-s-kidnapped-girls-video |title=What role for US in efforts to rescue Nigeria's kidnapped girls?|publisher=CSMonitor|date=5 May 2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://therainbow.com.ng/tabloid/boko-haram-kidnapped-the-230-school-girls-as-wives-for-its-insurgents/ |title=Boko Haram kidnapped the 230 school girls as wives for its insurgents|work=The Rainbow|date=29 April 2014|accessdate=}}{{dead link|date=April 2015}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=TelegApr30&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/nigeria/10797454/Nigeria-kidnapped-schoolgirls-sold-as-wives-to-Islamist-fighters.html|title=Nigeria: kidnapped schoolgirls 'sold as wives to Islamist fighters'|first=Laura|last=Heaton|work=[[The Daily Telegraph]]|date=30 April 2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In May, a video in which Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau claimed responsibility for the kidnappings emerged; he claimed, ''&amp;quot;Allah instructed me to sell them...I will carry out his instructions.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref name =BBC&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-27283383|title=Boko Haram admits abducting Nigeria girls from Chibok|publisher=BBC News|date=5 May 2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and ''&amp;quot;Slavery is allowed in my religion, and I shall capture people and make them [[slave]]s.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref name=CNNEssenceTerror&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2014/05/06/world/africa/nigeria-boko-haram-analysis/|agency=[[CNN]]|title=Boko Haram: The essence of terror|last=Lister|first=Tim|date=6 May 2014 |accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He said the girls should not have been in school and instead should have been married since girls as young as nine are suitable for marriage.&amp;lt;ref name=BBC/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=CNNEssenceTerror/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hillary Clinton]] refused to place Boko Haram on the [[Obama]] [[State Department]]'s list of foreign terrorist organizations.  The refusal came despite the urging of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and over a dozen Senators and Congressmen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Morrissey, Ed (May 8, 2014). [https://hotair.com/archives/2014/05/08/did-hillary-refuse-to-designate-boko-haram-as-a-terrorist-organization/ &amp;quot;Did Hillary refuse to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist organization?&amp;quot;] Hot Air website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Placing Boko Haram on the State Department's terrorist list would then give legal authority to the CIA or FBI to act.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Darfur ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|Rape during the Darfur genocide}}&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout the ongoing [[genocide]] in the Darfur war in [[Sudan]], there has been a systematic campaign of rape,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;spencer24092004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=11278|title=The Rape Jihad|last=Spencer|first=Robert|authorlink=Robert Spencer (author)|date=24 September 2004|publisher=FrontPageMagazine.com|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which has been used as a [[weapon]] of war, in the [[ethnic cleansing]] of black Africans from the region.{{sfn|Ball|2011|p=107}}{{sfn|GOMA|2011}}{{sfn|Hagan|2005|p=531}} The majority of rapes have been carried out by the Sudanese government forces and the [[Janjaweed]] (&amp;quot;evil men on horseback&amp;quot;){{sfn|Straus|2005|p=126}} paramilitary groups.{{sfn|Hirsch|2012}}{{sfn|Hashim|2009|p=226}} The actions of the Janjaweed have been described as genocidal rape, with not just women, but children also being raped, as well as babies being bludgeoned to death and the sexual mutilation of victims being commonplace.{{sfn|Rothe|2009|p=53}}{{sfn|Hagan|2005|pp=525–562}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rape of Afghanistan===	&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Biden/Harris foreign policy}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kabul 2021.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Joe Biden, author of the [[Violence Against Women Act]], abandoned the women and girls of Afghanistan to the Taliban rape jihad.]]&lt;br /&gt;
On July 8, 2021, [[Joe Biden]] said from the White House, &amp;quot;I trust the capacity of the Afghan military, who is better trained, better equipped, and more competent in terms of conducting war.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/national-security/bidens-afghanistan-predictions-were-all-wrong/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[CNN]] reported that on July 12, 2021 the [[Taliban]] knocked on the door of a mother of four in a small village in northern [[Afghanistan]]. They were demanding food. The mother told them, &amp;quot;I am poor, how can I cook for you?&amp;quot;  The Taliban beat her to death.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/17/asia/afghanistan-women-taliban-intl-hnk-dst/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Less than a month later, White House chief propagandists [[Jen Psaki]] said &amp;quot;The Taliban has to make an assessment about what they want their role to be in the international community.&amp;quot;  Her comments came as reports flowed in of Taliban fighters going door-to-door and forcibly selecting girls as young as 12 to reward as brides for the victorious jihadis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/articles/afghans-tell-of-executions-forced-marriages-in-taliban-held-areas-11628780820&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In Takhar province, the Taliban shot and killed a woman when she went out in public without a [[burqa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2021/08/17/taliban-kill-woman-not-wearing-burqa-after-vowing-to-honor-womens-rights/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taliban commanders, after capturing some of the provincial capitals, ordered local Imams to bring the lists of unmarried women aged from 12 to 45  for their soldiers to marry as they view them as ‘qhanimat’ or ‘spoils of war’. The Taliban intends to “distribute ” these kids and women among themselves as Jihadists consider them as a ‘prize’.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.opindia.com/2021/08/atrocities-on-civilians-increase-as-taliban-blitz-takes-over-afghanistan/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Taliban went door-to-door taking women and children. The people must mark their house with an “X” if they have a girl over 12 years old, so that the Taliban can take them. If they find a young girl and the house was not marked they will execute the entire family. If a married woman 25 years or older was found, the Taliban promptly kill her husband, do whatever they want to her, and then sell her as a sex slave.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/taliban-going-door-to-door-seeking-christians-searching-through-phones-for-bible-apps-report&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a female refugee in [[India]] who worked in the police force in Afghanistan, as reported by OpIndia.com, the Taliban has sex with dead bodies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/7O4Wk#selection-3899.8-3899.32&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The woman said in an interview, &amp;quot;If you go to work, you are under threat, your family is under threat. After one warning, they would stop giving any warning.  They rape dead bodies too. They don’t care whether the person is dead or alive.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/XlWHS7fKzD8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Child sexual exploitation==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Child sex trade}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== UK grooming cases ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Grooming gang}}&lt;br /&gt;
Widespread organized child sexual abuse took place in many places throughout [[England]], dating from 1997,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kern&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mccarthy&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Britain&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|last1=Kern|first1=Soeren|title=Britain's &amp;quot;Rape Jihad&amp;quot; Crisis|url=http://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2013/07/13/britains_rape_jihad_crisis_105316.html |publisher=RealClearWorld|date=13 July 2013|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=autogenerated1&amp;gt;{{cite web|last1=Jay|first1=Alexis|title=Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham (1997 - 2013)|url=http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/1407/independent_inquiry_cse_in_rotherham |page=92|website=http://www.rotherham.gov.uk|publisher=Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=BBC1Nov2013&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-24771229|title=Alexis Jay will lead child abuse failings probe at Rotherham|date=1 November 2013 | work=[[BBC News]]|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in which it was conservatively estimated that 1,400 children had been sexually abused in the city, predominantly by gangs of British-Pakistani men. Abuses described included [[Kidnap|abduction]], [[rape]], [[torture]] and sex trafficking of children.&amp;lt;ref name=autogenerated1/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Saul26Aug2014&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/rotherham-child-abuse-report-finds-1400-children-subjected-to-appalling-sexual-exploitation-within-16year-period-9691825.html|title=Rotherham child abuse report finds 1,400 children subjected to 'appalling' sexual exploitation within 16-year period | work=[[The Independent]]|location=London|date=26 August 2014|first=Heather|last=Saul|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=BBC26Aug2014&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28939089|title=Rotherham child abuse scandal: 1,400 children exploited, report finds|date=26 August 2014|work=[[BBC News]]|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;dutt&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20141216180321/https://udayindia.in/english/content_27sept2014/cover-story.html|title=MYSTERY OF LOVE JIHAD|last=Dutt|first=Vijay|date=27 September 2014|publisher=Uday India|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;guardian13032013&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/mar/13/english-defence-league-sex-grooming|title=English Defence League exploiting sex-grooming fears, says report|last=Smith|first=Mark|date=13 March 2013|work=The Guardian|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bbc14052013&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-22522232|title=Uncomfortable truths of child exploitation in Britain|last=Easton|first=Mark|date=14 May 2013|work=BBC.com|publisher=BBC|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In one UK city alone, 1,400 non-Muslim girls were groomed, [[rape]]d, trafficked, and drugged between 1997 and 2013 while those in authority failed to act. The [[police]] have been accused of ignoring sex abuse claims because of political correctness and fear of accusation of [[racism]], as well as allegedly blaming some child victims.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/grooming-gangs-uk-britain-newcastle-serious-case-review-operation-sanctuary-shelter-muslim-asian-a8225106.html?amp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Leftist]] organizations waged relentless war against anyone who spoke out about Muslim rape gangs. Victims and critics were demonized as &amp;quot;[[Islamophobic]],&amp;quot; “hateful” and “[[bigot]]ed.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/05/uk-100-investigations-in-rotherham-into-police-misconduct-over-refusal-to-stop-muslim-rape-gangs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UK police, who turned a blind eye to Pakastani rape culture and blamed victims,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://amp.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/23/northumbria-police-operation-sanctuary-newcastle-grooming-gangs-case-review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; have urged the public to report ‘non-crime’ incidents in an effort to stop non-criminal comments from hurting the feelings of those affected. The message sent out by the official Twitter account of South Yorkshire Police said, “In addition to reporting [[hate crime]], please report non-crime hate incidents, which can include things like offensive or insulting comments, online, in person or in writing.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://caldronpool.com/uk-police-urge-public-to-report-non-crimes-that-cause-hurt-feelings-same-department-policing-areas-where-1400-girls-were-raped-by-muslim-gangs/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; So, while rape and murder of ethnic Brits by Muslim immigrants is ignored, the UK police do have time to investigate non-crimes and harass native citizens.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Racist and misogynistic motivation ==&lt;br /&gt;
Adherents of Islam who engage in rape jihad are frequently motivated by [[racism]] and [[misogyny]] in their attacks on women (particularly white women), in efforts to humiliate them in perverse and disgusting fashion and to bring them down below their level - a tactic which dates back to the time of [[Mohammed]], who directed his followers to engage in such behavior.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Islam fantasies&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Because of the racially and ideologically motivated efforts of leftist politicians in the United Kingdom, other European countries and Australia to go out of their way to make Islam a &amp;quot;protected class&amp;quot; (including by allowing its adherents to do as they please and not prosecuting them, or even arresting them, for crimes they commit), women in those countries have been doubly victimized by both Islamic rapists and by leftist criminals in public office who provide cover for the rapists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wiki bias ==&lt;br /&gt;
In June 2025, [[Breitbart]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news |title=Cover Up: Wikipedia Editors Propose Deleting UK Grooming Gangs Scandal Article |url=https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2025/06/29/cover-up-wikipedia-editors-propose-deleting-uk-grooming-gangs-scandal-article/ |work=Breitbart |date=June 29, 2025}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; reported that a [[Wikipedia]] page about the UK grooming gangs scandal was nominated for deletion by a liberal editor, who argued it was a biased or “fringe” duplicate of broader child sexual abuse coverage. &lt;br /&gt;
The move is part of a wider dispute over how the topic is represented on Wikipedia, highlighting claims of past institutional cover-ups and referencing a recent review that identified failures by UK authorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Love jihad]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nikah Misyar]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Women under the Taliban]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Grooming gang]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B8Oc5TbbMqE 16-year-old German girl pleads for help from onslaught of Muslim immigration]. YouTube.com &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Islam]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2198999</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2198999"/>
		<updated>2026-07-09T03:46:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: /* Rape Gang Inquiry Report on 250,000 girls 'strengthens link with Islam' */ ‘grooming gangs’ and Islam&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==War news==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/text-of-mou-released-major-geopolitical Text Of MOU Released--Major Geopolitical Shifts Ahead]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Prof Robert Pape]]: [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/stage-iv-begins-inside-the-bloombergs Stage IV Begins? -- Inside the Bloomberg's Iran MOU].&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the United States may now be entering Stage IV of the Escalation Trap: '''acceptance of the gradual emergence of an [[Iran]]ian [[sphere of influence]].'''&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;a stronger Iran creates new incentives for [[Israel]] to act before Iranian power grows further. And if Israel concludes that [[diplomacy]] is accelerating rather than limiting Iranian influence, the next sixty days could become more dangerous, not less.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scott Creighton]]: [https://scottcreighton.substack.com/p/magafact-trump-on-minab-massacre MAGAfact: Trump on Minab Massacre - Sh*t Happens].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/lessons-for-iran-from-the-korean Lessons for Iran from the Korean War].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Sullivan]]: America's [[Suez Crisis|Suez Moment]]. [https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/americas-suez-moment-b4d]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Krainer]]: [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/alex-krainer-the-wests-political The West's Political Legitimacy Crisis Is Triggering World War III].&lt;br /&gt;
*Aurelien: [https://aurelien2022.substack.com/p/while-we-were-sleeping Life is full of surprises.]&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|I’m reliably informed that there are people in Washington and other western capitals who were “surprised” by the ineffectiveness of the recent US/Israeli campaign against Iran, and by the effective surrender of the US as demonstrated in the very one-sided Memorandum of Understanding agreed last week. I put “surprised” in quotation marks, because it’s a word I will come back to several times, and it’s a kind of leitmotif for western policy and western misunderstanding over the last couple of generations. It’s not unique to the West, to be fair, but the West has been the most powerful politico-military actor of modern times, and we’ll concentrate on the West for the most part.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, governments experience surprises all the time, in the sense that things happen which were not expected, or things happen that were thought possible but very unlikely, or things that were thought inevitable don’t happen at all. This is sufficiently common in [[international politics]], and sufficiently serious in its implications, that I thought it might be useful to devote an essay to the question of Why such surprises happen: a subject which hardly anyone takes an interest in, since politically it’s usually enough just to condemn you opponents for being [[naive]], [[ignorant]] or [[stupid]], demand an enquiry and the job is done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[...]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only way to deal with the problem of information saturation is by structured analysis of each piece of information, but this takes far more time than most government people have. What’s the source? Is it reliable? Has it been reliable in the past? Is there collateral for it? Does it sound logical and reasonable? Is it what I want to hear, rather than what is necessarily true? And so on. These sorts of questions—part of the training of intelligence analysts and for related disciplines— are just not feasible at scale.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Excellent summary &amp;amp; analysis. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:20, June 24, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;[[Best of the public]]&amp;quot; (see also [[12-12-12 Rule]]) refers to the general population, those with an [[IQ]] between 90 and 110 (in this sense, [[User:Conservative]]'s Essay's can be considered &amp;quot;the best of the public&amp;quot;); it should be remembered however it was &amp;quot;the Best of the public&amp;quot; that led to the 12 Plagues of Egypt and destruction of [[Sodom]] and Gomorrah. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:00, June 24, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conflicts Forum]]: [https://conflictsforum.substack.com/p/the-price-and-consequences-of-defeat: The Price and Consequences of Defeat].&lt;br /&gt;
:*[ Even the CIA-controlled Wikipedia recognizes it as a defeat].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chas Freeman]]: [https://chasfreeman662157.substack.com/p/the-forever-war-in-west-asia-and The Forever War in West Asia and its Implications]. ''A Scene Setter for an Energy Intelligence Colloquium.''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scott Ritter]]: [https://scottritter.substack.com/p/ukraine-and-the-end-of-nato Ukraine and the End of NATO].&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|[[Western alliance|Western]] [[mainstream media]] and its [[social media]] [[echo chamber]]s promote a [[narrative]] centered around the notion of [[Russian]] fatigue, [[Ukrainian]] resilience, and [[western]] resolve, and take delight in highlighting talking points premised on a Russian-generated quagmire that has dragged on longer than the [[Great Patriotic War]] of 1941-45. This narrative parallels that of the officially held positions of most of the nations that make up the membership of [[NATO]], which is no surprise, given the hand-in-glove relationship between [[corporate]]-controlled [[media]] and [[government]]s possessing a revolving door relationship with these same corporations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This narrative is deliberately misleading, since it is not designed to reflect [[fact]]-based [[truth]], but rather promote a [[fiction]] that is being used to shape [[public]] perception so that the -[[NATO war in Ukraine|Russo-Ukraine conflict]] can be sustained through to its desired conclusion—the [[strategic defeat]] of Russia. This objective is the formal position of NATO and its key constituent members, having been given voice numerous times since first being articulated in May of 2022. The concept is built around three basic pillars, those being the [[economic]] collapse of Russia brought about by [[economic sanctions]], the [[military]] exhaustion of Russia brought on by an endless war underwritten by the [[collective west]], and the disintegration of Russian [[societal]] structures leading to the termination of the Russian government headed by [[President Vladimir Putin]]....}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Beinart]]: [https://peterbeinart.substack.com/p/an-imperial-decline-story “An Imperial Decline Story”]. ''Aslı Bâli and [[Trita Parsi]] on what comes next for the [[US]], [[Israel]], and [[Iran]].''&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://breakingdefense.com/2026/06/how-ukraines-military-is-adapting-after-four-years-of-war-with-russia/ Biden stooge reports on &amp;quot;frontline visit&amp;quot; to Ukraine four years too late].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://youtu.be/xpsrY_e4BeM &amp;quot;NATO Faces A Stunning Defeat&amp;quot;, Mearsheimer's Chilling Ukraine Prediction | NATO SUMMIT]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Israel===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alex Jones]]: [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/false-flag-tucker-carlsons-warning Israel has one trump card and its nuclear].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peter Beinart]]: [https://peterbeinart.substack.com/p/bradlander2026 “This Reallignment is Happening.”] ''[[Brad Lander]] on the Jewish community’s shifting values on Israel-Palestine.''&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Our guest is Brad Lander, who last week won the [[Democratic]] nomination for [[Congress]] in [[New York]]’s 10th district. Brad’s victory is a milestone: A [[Jewish]] [[politician]], running on his support for [[Palestinian]] [[rights]], winning in one of the most Jewish districts in the country. Even a few years ago, it would have been unimaginable....&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:*What a joke. Brad is no symptom. He is unstable. Upto a year ago he was linked to zionists. Beinart changed when Trump rose over a decade ago. Oddball Brad needs to see what they did with Scott Wiener even after he uttered the G word (due to intimidation). Or with the liberal victims of Oct 7, like this one https://x.com/Mazelit_/status/2074156335411642596 [[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 01:04, July 7, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::What do you know about [[Abdul El-Sayed]]? ''[[The Intercept]]'': [https://theintercept.com/2026/06/29/abdul-el-sayed-jewish-voice-peace-senate/ Abdul El-Sayed Becomes First Senate Candidate Backed by Pro-Palestine Jewish Group]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Do normal heterosexuals spend 20 yrs Googling the locations of gay bathhouses?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:46, July 7, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lebanon===&lt;br /&gt;
* Islamic Republic claims. [https://www.ryandawson.org/p/presstv-colleague-hit-by-israel-drone PressTV reporter hit by Israeli drone while reporting live].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Senior US officials: Israel maintains ‘right to defend itself against’ Hezbollah attacks under US-Iran deal. “The deal is a ceasefire, and it will not be a one-way ceasefire,” an official said on Monday. [https://www.jns.org/news/u-s-news/senior-us-officials-israel-maintains-right-to-defend-itself-against-hezbollah-attacks-under-us-iran-deal].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Senior US official. Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon not a condition for deal.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/428677]&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:55, June 15, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alastair Crooke]]: [https://youtu.be/5RrorBzJhgs IRAN’S TRIGGER WARNING: ‘Withdraw from Lebanon… Any Violations and We Strike].&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RobSmith|RobSmith]] ([[User talk:RobSmith|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While US Iran reach a deal via biased Pakistan/Qatar, Iran's Hezbollah attack... [https://www.timesofisrael.com/amid-us-iran-deal-idf-says-hezbollah-continues-attacking-troops-in-south-lebanon/ Amid U.S.-Iran Deal, Hizbullah Continues Attacking IDF Troops in South Lebanon]&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 14:45, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:*''[[Times of Israel]]'': &amp;quot;A senior US official told reporters on Monday that the MOU signed a day earlier with Iran is '''not conditioned on Israel withdrawing from Lebanon.''' However, '''the deal still envisions a [[ceasefire]] that covers Lebanon''', as well as Iran, the US official said in a briefing with reporters.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::Comment: What's happening is fairly simple to see: US [[negotiator]]s are saying, &amp;quot;We can't control what [[Israel]] does&amp;quot; and [[Iran]]ian negotiators are saying &amp;quot;We can't control what [[Hezbollah]] does.&amp;quot; So the can gets kicked down the road. Nonetheless, Iran does not concede its demand that Israel withdraw from Lebanon, not just a [[ceasefire]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:01, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Open Source Intel: [https://x.com/Osint613/status/2066291045478912364?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Iranian Mehr News Agency has published the supposed 14 clauses of the MOU];&lt;br /&gt;
:::::This item here:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::*&amp;quot;Iran's missile program and '''support for resistance groups''' are '''removed from the agenda entirely&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
:::::is what gives the [[American]] side the right or position to claim it cannot control [[Israel]]i actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iran===&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The American Conservative]]'': [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/trump-just-changed-the-iran-conversation/ Trump Just Changed the Conversation About Iran]. ''[[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] and [[Tehran]] need not be enemies forever.''&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|“We got along very well with [[Iran]],” [[Trump]] said on Monday in a joint press conference with [[France]]’s [[President Emmanuel Macron]]. “I find them to be more [[rational]], very smart,” Trump told [[NBC News]] last week.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*''[[NYT]]'': [https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/15/world/middleeast/israel-netanyahus-iran-strategy.html &amp;quot;While Mr. Trump has praised Iran's new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, as pragmatic, he has called Mr. Netanyahu crazy, ungrateful and lacking in judgment&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Stockman]]: [https://davidstockman.substack.com/p/on-the-donalds-surrender-to-the-mullahs On The Donald’s Surrender To The Mullahs: Good for America But Too Late To Save His Own Skin].&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;This last and most pathetic [[Regime Change]] [[War]] may finally destroy the [[UniParty]] [[consensus]] which has prevailed since the end of the [[Cold War]] in 1991; and set off a [[civil war]] in the [[Republican party]] that may finally rid the remnant that emerges from the baleful grasp of the [[Bibi]]/[[neocon]] [[Fifth Column]]. Stated differently, what the neocons will denounce as the Donald’s surrender will underscore better than anything else that the [[war]] was a gigantic mistake;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''[[Daily Caller]]'': [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/16/donald-trump-iran-mou-peace-deal-israel-netanyahu-neocons-iranian-hardliners/ Here Are The 3 Factions Slipping Poison Pills Into Trump’s Peace Process].&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the Israelis, the Iran Hawks and Israel Firsters, and hardliners in the Iranian regime.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::*[[Paul Craig Roberts]]: '[https://thealtworld.com/paul_craig_roberts/israel-first-is-prevailing-over-america-first Israel First Is Prevailing Over America First]. ''Betrayal by [[Trump]] and the [[Republican]]s.''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Daily Mail]]'': [https://youtu.be/8wMoKLuL8Jc How Iran's $100k missile destroyed $1.5bn of US equipment].&lt;br /&gt;
:$100,000 is 1/15,000 of $1.5 Billion; is this why the boys in the [[Pentagon]] need another half Trillion ($500,000,000,000) in the War budget so it can fail again at a crucial time in coming years and decades? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:27, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/dont-read-too-deeply-into-ghalibafs Don’t Read Too Deeply Into Ghalibaf’s Quip About A Sino-Iranian Bloc].&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The Grayzone]]'': [https://thegrayzone.substack.com/p/whats-behind-iranian-calls-for-revenge What's behind Iranian calls for revenge on Trump?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Full text of the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America, jointly and in good faith, agreed on the following on June 18, 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The Islamic Republic of Iran, the United States of America, and their allies in the current war, by signing this memorandum of understanding, declare an immediate and permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon, and commit not to initiate any war or military operation against each other henceforth, to refrain from threats or use of force against each other, and to guarantee the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. The final agreement will confirm the permanent end of the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, and the other provisions of this clause.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America commit to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America commit to conduct negotiations and reach a final agreement within a maximum of 60 days, extendable by mutual consent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Immediately upon signing this memorandum of understanding, the United States of America will begin lifting its naval blockade and any harassment or obstruction against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will completely end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, ship traffic will be proportional to the pre-war traffic volume as established by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America also commits to withdraw its military forces from the peripheral area of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Upon signing this memorandum of understanding, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements with its utmost effort for the safe passage of commercial ships, free of charge for only 60 days, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. Commercial ship traffic will commence immediately and will be established within 30 days considering the necessity of removing technical and military obstacles and mine clearance by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Islamic Republic of Iran will negotiate with the Sultanate of Oman to determine the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz, in accordance with applicable international law and the sovereign rights of the coastal countries of the Strait of Hormuz, and will also consult with other Persian Gulf coastal countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The United States of America commits, together with its regional partners, to create a definitive program agreed upon by both parties for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran, providing at least 300 billion dollars. The implementation mechanism of this program will be finalized as part of the final agreement within 60 days. All necessary approvals, waivers, and licenses for the related financial transactions will be provided by the United States of America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. The United States of America commits to end all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including United Nations Security Council resolutions, International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral U.S. sanctions, both primary and secondary, according to a timetable agreed upon as part of the final agreement. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the fundamental importance of the issue of sanction removal mentioned above and express their intention to address these matters promptly in negotiations to reach a mutual agreement on them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. The Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms that it will not produce or acquire nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America have agreed that the status of stored enriched materials will be resolved through a mechanism agreed upon by both parties and according to the timetable set forth in clause 7, at least by dilution on site, under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Both parties also agree to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed topics related to the nuclear needs of the Islamic Republic of Iran based on a satisfactory framework to be agreed upon in the final agreement. The final agreement will confirm the provisions of this clause. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the fundamental importance of the nuclear issues mentioned above and express their intention to address these matters promptly in negotiations to reach a mutual agreement on them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America agree to maintain the status quo until a final agreement is reached; the Islamic Republic of Iran will maintain the status quo in its nuclear program, and the United States of America will not impose any new sanctions against Iran nor deploy additional military forces in the region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. The United States of America commits to immediately issuing waivers from the Treasury Department for the export of Iranian crude oil, petrochemical products and their derivatives, and all related services including banking transactions, insurance, transportation, etc., upon signing this memorandum of understanding and until the sanctions are lifted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. The United States of America commits to fully making available the limited or blocked funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran for use upon implementation of this memorandum of understanding. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will mutually agree on the procedure for releasing these funds during the negotiations. These funds, whether held in the main account or transferred, must be fully usable for payment to any ultimate beneficiary designated by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America commits to issuing all necessary approvals and licenses in this regard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America agree to establish an executive mechanism to monitor the successful implementation of this memorandum of understanding and future adherence to the final agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. After signing this memorandum of understanding and subject to the commencement of implementation of clauses 1, 4, 5, 10, and 11 of this memorandum and the continuation of these actions, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America will exclusively begin negotiations on the remaining clauses of the final agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. The final agreement will be endorsed by a binding resolution of the United Nations Security Council.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Global21]]: [https://global21.substack.com/p/trump-iran-the-gcc-and-the-battle Trump, Iran, the GCC and the battle of time]. ''Who will fall first, [[iran]], the [[GCC]], [[trump]] or the world [[economy]]?''&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|[[Netanyahu]] once again triggered the front in [[Lebanon]], where through it he holds the power to grant or deny any type of agreement between [[Trump]] and [[Iran]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When netanyahu reheats this front, he also moves the entire [[Israel]]i [[lobby]] in [[Washington, D.C.|washington]], because [[hezbollah]] is a unanimous issue across all currents of the Israeli lobby. There is not the slightest possibility of a [[peace]] agreement that preserves the existence and [[financing]] of hezbollah and is accepted by israel. Anything in this direction would allow hezbollah to rebuild its arsenal, which frightened israel with its attack power when israel was announcing that it had already exterminated the group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to this point netanyahu holds and will exercise this power since his [[political]] survival is tied to it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump has other factors tied to his political survival, passing primarily through [[inflation]] control and then [[election]]s. Many people may disagree, but trump’s methods of deceiving the [[market]] are giving him political and [[economic]] survival. With each [[false]] agreement, with each expectation created on Mondays, trump wins more time and puts the market on the back burner.}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/component/content/article/trump-threatens-iran-delegation-in-switzerland-if-you-dont-make-a-deal-you-wont-even-make-it-back-to-your-fucking-country Trump Threatens Iran Delegation in Switzerland &amp;quot;If you don't make a deal . . . you won't even make it back to your f------ Country!&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
:*BREAKING: [[Iran]]'s FM [[Araghchi]] announces the [[US]] has now launched the $300 billion reconstruction plan, waived all [[oil]] &amp;amp; petrochemical [[export]]s, lifted the [[naval]] [[blockade]] and released some frozen Iranian [[asset]]s, extracting all of these items shortly before the delegation walkout over [[Trump]]'s assassination threat. [https://x.com/HormuzLetter/status/2068887533489098831]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:C2fc8293-45af-4bb8-8fc9-972da378a3df 867x488.jpg|center|650px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fb52a125-bd3b-4980-91ab-248a4321045e 867x488.jpg||center|650px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Pepe Escobar]] and [[Larry Johnson]]: How did [[Pakistan]]'s hidden tech stop kill chain in [[Iran]]? [https://youtu.be/NkiJqG5XGUw]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/25/iran-challenges-us-doctrine-of-low-intensity-warfare/ Iran Challenges US Doctrine of Low-Intensity Warfare].&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://global21.substack.com/p/iran-must-strategically-reorient Iran Must Strategically Reorient Itself in Peacetime].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[David T. Pyne]]: [https://dpyne.substack.com/p/what-was-the-point-of-fighting-an Trump Restarts the War Bombing Four Iranian Military Sites].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/iran-much-with-little Iran: much with little]. ''[[America]]: little with much.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hindustan Times]]: [https://youtu.be/bUbOVU2JIaM Trump Forced to Tap Out: Iran’s Deadly Strikes on US Naval Base in Bahrain Trigger $400 Million Bill].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rachel Blevins]] and [[Prof Robert Pape]]: [https://rachelblevins.substack.com/p/iran-escalation-trap-trump-robert-pape U.S. CAUGHT IN ‘ESCALATION TRAP’: IRAN NOT DETERRED FROM FIGHTING BACK].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Trump weighs restarting [[Iran war]]. [https://archive.ph/g6mkr#selection-541.0-545.136]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gulf States===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Yanis Varoufakis]]: [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/yanis-varoufakis-us-surrenders-to U.S. Surrenders to Iran &amp;amp; Gulf States Must Adjust].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://tass.com/world/2151843 Key US Fifth Fleet facilities in Bahrain damaged by Iran in spring — WSJ].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[YNet]]: [https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hyxq79oggx After Iran strikes, US rethinks Gulf bases and weighs Israel].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pakistan===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://youtu.be/NkiJqG5XGUw Did Pakistan’s Tech disrupt Kill Chain in Iran?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ukraine===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Zelenskyy_curse#English Zelensky curse]: [https://x.com/Sputnik_India/status/1854080671280427177 World leaders who shake Volodymyr Zelenskyy's hand are subsequently removed from office, often in a humiliating fashion.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/russia-must-defeat-ukraine-before Russia Must Defeat Ukraine Before Trump 2.0’s “War Of Attrition” Really Gets Going].&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Berletic]]: [https://thealtworld.com/anthony_cartalucci/us-ukrainian-drone-campaign-targeting-crimea US-Ukrainian Drone Campaign Targeting Crimea].&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[HistoryLegends]]: [https://youtu.be/OzUrAyq9X9s Ukraine’s DESPERATE Attempt to Force Peace on Russia].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Events in Ukraine]]: [https://eventsinukraine.substack.com/p/concentration-camp-army Concentration camp army]. ''Mobilizing and beating to death [[drug addict]]s, the [[Mental illness|mentally disabled]], and [[conscientious objector]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|The [[Ukrainian army]] has developed an ingenious method to deal with the desertion wracking it throughout 2025. Mobilized men trying to escape are murdered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Drug addicts mobilized during their [[methadone]] treatments. Mentally disabled men mobilized and beaten for discipline. Ordinary drafted men subjected to the [[law]]s of the post-[[soviet]] prison system. Drug addicts going through agonizing withdrawals, hallucinating and throwing piss in the same punishment dungeon as conscientious objectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All troops go to the [[toilet]] under the barrel of a [[gun]]. Often all they have is a bottle in their tent. Wrapped up in duct tape and thrown into a concrete floor after an escape attempt, shitting on the floor beneath their immobilized body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To prevent escapes, training bases are surrounded by mines. [[Men]] still try to run away, or perhaps simply prefer [[suicide]] by mine to the constant beatings and [[torture]] endured daily to break the [[spirit]]s of the new recruits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nine suicides witnessed by one man in four days at the training camp. Commanders play with their recruits, forcing them to beat each other in mock [[gladiator]] fights. A mobilized man beaten so hard his face is blue, commanders laughing that he can only crawl, calling him ‘bluey’.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dozens officially [[dead]] of ‘[[pneumonia]]’ this year. A 50 year old [[Baptist]] conscientious objector, forcefed through an [[IV]] drip after he went on hunger strike, beaten daily by a medic whose call sign was ‘[[Satan]]’. His [[wife]] said his broken body had an ‘inexplicable dent’ in his back. His face unrecognizable, only identifiable by a mole. [[Heart]] problems, the [[doctor]]s concluded. No signs of a [[violent]] death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[soldier]] suffering from methadone withdrawals dragged around the base from a quad bike. He and others [[photograph]]ed with large patches of [[skin]] missing. Complains to [[family]] he’s being beaten so hard he’s shitting himself. He escapes to a [[hospital]] and tells doctors of his ordeal. Dead a few days later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dog]]s maul those trying to escape the camps. The training camps. Dogs are set on anyone else breaking discipline. Ribs broken during meetings if you mess up paperwork.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Commanders call all of them ‘one-time uses’. That’s all that any soldier is good for — one assault operation. At least someone in [[Maryland]] or [[London]] can get some frisson from [[news]] of counter-offensives by the daring, [[democratic]] [[Ukrainian]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[The west]] is funding a [[concentration camp]] [[army]]. &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''That’s from the words of Ukrainian soldiers, quoted by the most [[liberal]], [[western]]-funded Ukrainian [[media]]'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; out there. Of course, this latest investigation into the [[obscene]] brutality reigning in the army won’t be translated into [[English]] any time soon. ...}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Zelensky]]’s Interview Poured Fuel On The Flames Of His Spiraling [[UPA]] Dispute With [[Poland]]. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/zelenskys-interview-poured-fuel-on?]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Anti-hitler.png|center|650px|thumb|{{Cquote|They are the army, they are the defense. I am the guarantor of the [[Constitution]] and I am the Supreme [[Commander-in-Chief]] who must give them everything they need to protect our people and our land. And if they are motivated by their [[hero]]es, the name of heroic historical figures whom they respect, and if it is very important for them, I must do everything they tell me. The [[Pole]]s received this answer from me.|||[[Volodymyr Zelensky]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Recalling what he earlier alleged about how [[Ukraine]] is defending [[Poland]], [[Zelensky]] is essentially claiming that Poland’s defense is dependent on Ukrainians who [[glorify]] [[Hitler]]’s [[genocidal]] [[collaborator]]s. This is incredibly insulting, and seeing as how he said that he sent this answer to Poland, it’s little wonder that [[Nawrocki]] decided to revoke his country’s highest honor from him.|||[[Andrew Korybko]]}}]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/next-phase-of-psyop-ukraine-now-accuses Next Phase of Psyop: Ukraine Now Accuses Belarus of Rapid Militarization on Border].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoA]]: [https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/06/ukraine-isnt-winning.html Ukraine Isn’t Winning] (posted for [[User:Conservative]] to balance his reading before making [[Conservapedia]] an [[MSM]] [[echo chamber]] with more [[liberal claptrap]] &amp;amp; [[Russia hoax]] [[spam]].} &amp;quot;There is an ongoing [[Ukrainian propaganda war|Ukrainian propaganda campaign]] to depict the country as winning the conflict with Russia. bla bla bla...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
====User:Conservative is becoming a 'useful idiot' of a [[Ukrainian Nazi]] psyop====&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/zelenskys-40-day-influence-operation Zelensky’s 40-Day Influence Operation Against Russia Is Unlikely To Succeed]. &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|The timing points to this being his modus operandi considering September’s Russian State [[Duma]] elections. [[Putin]]’s foes hope that [[United Russia]] fares worse than its 49.82% of the [[popular vote]] during the last elections in 2021, thus forcing it into a [[coalition]] with either the [[communist]] or [[nationalist]] opposition parties.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:(A) Unlike [[Ukraine]], [[democratic]] [[Russia]] is having [[election]]s in [[war]]time. (B) Both the [[communist]]s &amp;amp; [[nationalist]] are more [[Warmonger|hawkish]] than [[Putin]]. This is definitely another [[idiot]]ic [[Western alliance|Western]] intel operation. They think by getting rid of [[Putin]], like getting rid of [[Ayatollah Khamenei]], solves all their problems. Their understanding of [[Russia]] is on a par with [[User:Conservative]].&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Simplicius]]: [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/mystery-valdai-meeting-between-putin 'Mystery' Valdai Meeting Between Putin and Lukashenko Stirs Speculation Amidst Zelensky's Latest Threats].&lt;br /&gt;
::''&amp;quot;One of the most interesting updates surrounding the current [[Ukraine war]] [[escalation]]s has been the ‘mysteriously’ abrupt visit of [[Belarus]]ian president [[Lukashenko]] to [[Valdai]] yesterday for a meeting with [[Putin]] that has now spanned two days. The length and secrecy shrouding the meeting has caused various speculations, particularly given Belarus’s central focus recently amidst '''[[Zelensky]]’s major ongoing [[psyop]]s meant to broaden the conflict''' and push [[Russia]] into a [[ceasefire]] [[Ukraine]] is in dire need of.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''&amp;quot;The meeting was reportedly unannounced and [[Kremlin]] spokesperson [[Peskov]] revealed that no official transcript or statements would be provided—which is certainly odd. “Officially” the agenda was said to include Union State matters, economic and trade agreements, etc. But the implication given the nature of the meeting is clearly that, instead, matters of grave [[military]] importance were discussed, which required Putin and Lukashenko’s direct face-to-face contact at Putin’s own private retreat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''&amp;quot;We can therefore only [[logic]]ally infer that this was a kind of emergency meeting where the two leaders ironed out a coordinated plan as to how their two respective countries should proceed [[militarily]] should [[Zelensky]] continue his upward spiral of [[provocation]]s. A matter that required such an immediate and private face-to-face meeting is certainly one justified in its urgency, a [[fact]] which further implies that Zelensky’s threats are serious enough, and have a high enough likelihood of materializing, as to require such a serious joint brainstorming session.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::''&amp;quot;As previously seen, [[Zelensky]] has announced '''a new “[[terrorism|campaign of terrors]]” lasting 40 days''' that is meant to be a kind of grandiose final arc to top the [[war]]. The ploy’s chief mechanic is obviously set to be a series of major [[escalation]]s combined with an unprecedented [[Ukraine propaganda war|information campaign]] to paint [[Russia]] as collapsing, and more importantly, [[Putin]] as being in the throes of an uprising. This is the age-old playbook used by [[Western alliance|Western]] [[intelligence agencies]] in [[Iran]] and elsewhere. &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Few could have missed the massive [[propaganda]] push the past few days, wherein all the regime stooges and&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;‘[[useful idiot]]s’ have been mobilized&amp;quot;''''' [ '''[https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template%3AMainpageright&amp;amp;diff=2198004&amp;amp;oldid=2197979 Ken isn't even being paid]''' ]&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Larry Johnson]]: [https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/ukraines-desperate-propaganda-campaign Ukraine’s Desperate Propaganda Campaign While Russia Advances Along the Entire Front].&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;It's all a load of [[crap]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Mark Sleboda]]: [https://marksleboda.substack.com/p/natos-new-dronepsyop-scheme-and-russias NATO's New Drone/Psyop Scheme And Russia's Crushing Response: The End No One Mentions/Slavyansk &amp;amp; Kramatorsk: The Final Battle for Donbas Has Begun].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/an-inside-view-of-western-consumers An Inside View of Western Consumers of the Anti-Russian Propaganda].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[The West|THE WEST]] IS FLOODED WITH [[Russophobia|ANTI-RUSSIA]] [[Propaganda|PROPAGANDA]]. [https://youtu.be/pzpDZurZFmM]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Russian [[Zircon]] wipes out [[Ukraine#Biological_weapons_research_labs|US Biolab in Kyiv]]. [https://youtu.be/8I_WOjeNRq4]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Responsible Statecraft]]'': [https://responsiblestatecraft.org/patriot-missile-system-ukraine/ Ukraine wants to make its own Patriot missiles. That's a bad idea.]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://youtu.be/2owXYuVwC0k PATRIOT MISSILES FAIL MISERABLY, Here's the Video Evidence] /[[MIT]] [[Prof Ted Postol]], [[Daniel Davis]] / Deep Dive&lt;br /&gt;
::Despite [[PR]] damage control that says the [[Patriot missile]] system has a 90% interception rate, [[Prof. Ted Postol]], who helped design the system, says the interception rate is more like 2%. Nevertheless, [[Lockheed Martin]] was recently given another $5 Billion contract to build more.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This system is not working at all. But they'll be happy to sell it to you, to the [[American]] [[people]]. And they'll also be happy to jeopardize, ''let me underscore this, which makes me furious beyond stealing from the American people'', jeopardize the future [[security]] of our country. Because if there's a problem with this system, we need to try to make planning adjustments, and [[strategy]] adjustments, and [[tactical]] adjustments as best we can to deal with this incredible shortfall. I'm not sure what those adjustments have to be, but I can tell you making believe that you're intercepting these things when the threat is only going to get bigger and more capable is really a bad choice for planning your [[national security]].|||Ted Postol}}&lt;br /&gt;
::*[[Simplicius]]: [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/ukrainian-authorities-panic-as-patriots Ukrainian Authorities Panic as Patriots Run Out Amidst Russian Ballistic Frenzy].&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;Even the [[Ukrainian]]s had to admit not a single one was shot down because [[Patriot missile]] stocks have run dry: Ukraine 🇺🇦 did not intercept a single one of the 23 [[Iskander]] [[ballistic missile]]s fired at [[Kyiv]] tonight because it ran out of PAC-3 interceptors...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::*[[News Forensics]]: [https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/the-pac3-scam The PAC3 Scam].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russia===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Finian Cunningham ]]: [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/trumps-iran-war-debacle-is-ominous-for-russia Trump’s Iran war debacle is ominous for Russia].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://youtu.be/MeUiunICBqg Russia's Doomsday Radio Activates].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alastair Crooke]]: [https://youtu.be/P2N9xpZFCCs Russia Re-Introducing Fear on the World's Stage].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mearsheimer]]: [https://youtu.be/klomRtbajV4 Russia's Red Lines Have Been Crossed].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peskov]]: [https://www.newsy-today.com/russia-nuclear-weapons-are-the-only-deterrent-to-global-war/ Nuclear Deterrence Only Force Preventing Global War].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://youtu.be/TOSXZYxrIDA RUSSIAN NUKES READY: Kremlin Backs NUCLEAR Armada As 'PROTECTION' To Prevent WW3 | Times Now World].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Larry Johnson]]: [https://glenndiesen.substack.com/p/larry-johnson-putin-warns-the-west Putin Warns the West - Russia is Ready for War]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Consortium News]]: [https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/27/watch-twtw-europe-russia-stare-at-war/ ‘Europe &amp;amp; Russia Stare at War’]. ''[[Europe]] trash talks war. [[Putin]] says [[Russia]] is ready. The [[U.S.]]-[[Iran]] [[ceasefire]] breaks down again and does [[NYC]] [[Mayor Zohran Mamdani]]’s victories really signal a new direction for [[Democrat]]?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Putin]]: [https://sputnikglobe.com/20260628/putin-russia-stands-firm-thanks-to-its-people-1124371844.html Russia stands in the way of evil...No one has ever managed to get rid of Russia, and no one will succeed in the future”.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/fsb-chief-bortnikov-is-right-theres FSB Chief Bortnikov Is Right: There’s No One In Ukraine To Talk To Besides Zelensky]].&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|former [[Naftali Bennett|Israeli Prime Minister Bennett]] claimed in early 2023 that Putin promised him the year prior not to harm his Ukrainian counterpart, and he’s thus far kept his word in spite of Zelensky authorizing Putin’s attempted assassination at his residence in [[Valdai]] last December. For reasons that only [[Putin]] can account for if publicly asked about this or if he decides to share them on his own volition, he’s absolutely uninterested in authorizing Zelensky’s assassination. This is the objective [[political]] [[reality]]....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...[[Trump]] reconciled with [[Zelensky]] after their public dispute early last year, subsequently reneged on his reported obligation to coerce him into withdrawing from [[Donbass]] in exchange for Putin declaring a [[ceasefire]] per the “[[Spirit of Anchorage]]”, and is now “escalating to de-escalate” with Russia. Far from being a liability, Zelensky is now viewed by Trump as an asset in his new “war of attrition” for coercing Putin into energy-related concessions after sensing weakness from him over the past year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, at this point, Putin’s hypothetical authorization of Zelensky’s assassination wouldn’t change the dynamics of this conflict in a way that would advance Russia’s interests. '''Trump made up his mind to double down on using Ukraine as the US’ [[proxy]]''' for coercing [[strategic]] concessions from Russia, and '''he’d be enraged if Putin took his new friend out''', which could prompt him to radically [[escalate]] in revenge.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*‘You’re playing with fire,’ [[RT]] editor-in-chief warns [[Europe]] (FULL INTERVIEW) [[Russian]] [[society]] is nearing the limit of its patience as [[Kiev]]’s [Western alliance|Western backers]] assist [[Ukrainian]] strikes deep into the country, [[Margarita Simonyan]] has said. [https://youtu.be/zoy_NMfsjH0]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Armenia===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://thealtworld.com/anthony_cartalucci/the-quiet-capture-of-armenia-the-secret-war-the-us-wages-beyond-armed-conflict The Quiet Capture of Armenia: The Secret War the US Wages Beyond Armed Conflict].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Europe===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://thepeacemonger.substack.com/p/piracy-in-the-english-channel Piracy in the English channel].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/18/hegseth-announces-six-month-review-of-u-s-posture-as-part-of-nato-3-0/ Hegseth Announces Six-Month Review of U.S. Posture as Part of NATO 3.0].&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Zhirinovsky]]: [https://www.bankingnews.gr/ta-paraksena/articles/870683/the-world-will-be-on-fire-zhirinovsky-s-nightmarish-prophecy-for-2026-global-chaos-to-grip-the-planet NATO will collapse in 2026].&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://t.me/Slavyangrad/166972 ‘NATO has been a paper tiger and a one-way street for too long. This will not continue’ - Hegseth.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Korybko]]: Zelensky Lied Through His Teeth About What Happened During [[Budanov]]’s Trip To [[Poland]]. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/zelensky-lied-through-his-teeth-about]&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The American Conservative]]'': [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/european-rearmament-is-a-trap/ European Rearmament Is a Trap].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====UK====&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Zelensky]] is a [[MI6]] influenced/controlled agent; [[Budanov]] is a [[CIA]] trained [[Nazi]] influenced/controlled agent. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:56, June 24, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[BORZZIKMAN]]: [https://youtu.be/M96igxGxyg0 British Nuclear Weapons in ODESA┃The UK has taken Vengeance on Russia for the deaths of SBS soldiers].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[UK]] [https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/25/mps-want-probe-of-illegal-uk-arms-shipments-to-israel/ MPs Want Probe of Illegal UK Arms Shipments to Israel].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Finian Cunningham]]: [[Andy Burnham]], [[Britain]]’s next [[prime minister]], gets his marching orders. [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/andy-burnham-britains-next-prime-minister-gets-his-marching-orders]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===China===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Arnaud Bertrand]]: [https://arnaudbertrand.substack.com/p/is-ray-dalio-correct-that-china-is Is Ray Dalio correct that China is reviving the tribute system?] ''I often like [[Ray Dalio]]’s takes on [[China]] but he gets quite a lot demonstrably wrong in his [[FT]] article on the “tribute system.”''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Venezuela===&lt;br /&gt;
*Earthquake strikes Venezuela oil port after [[US]] cuts off oil [[export]]s to [[China]] and seizes Venezuela heavy crude for itself. See also &amp;quot;[[Free trade]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/component/content/article/11-000-missing-164-confirmed-dead-after-venezuela-earthquakes 11,000 Missing, 164 confirmed Dead, After Venezuela Earthquakes].&lt;br /&gt;
:*Venezuela Kicks Out [[Clinton Foundation]] for 'Trafficking Children' Amid Earthquake Chaos. [https://x.com/tpvsean/status/2072387460454392157]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===United States===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CIA]] and [[USAID]]. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/25/cia-and-usaid/?lctg=66158495]&lt;br /&gt;
:CIA &amp;amp; USAID started the [[Ukraine war]] with the [[Maidan coup]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[News Forensics]]: [https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/the-golden-age-of-lies The Golden Age of Lies].&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;In some sense, [[Trump]] is the best [[President]] ever, because he is the worst [[liar]] ever — “worst” meaning his lies are so very obvious—they look like lies, which highlights the [[truth]], at least for those who are interested in that. So when Trump tells us that he has destroyed [[Iran]]’s [[military]] capabilities and then we see Iranian [[missile]]s and [[drone]]s taking out [[American]] [[radar]]s and bases, the truth flashes across the mind: the [[US]] has lost.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Breaking Defense]]'': [https://breakingdefense.com/2026/06/hegseth-hosted-emerging-weapons-makers-for-meeting-on-munitions-production-sources/ Why Hegseth met secretly with emerging industry reps].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[News Forensics]]: [https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/the-economics-of-war The Economics of War].&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;[[War]]s begin, are fought, and end. What is it all about? [[Greed]]. [[Money]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alastair Crooke]]: [https://youtu.be/1e00cv3DnI8 'The Petrodollar era is now collapsing'].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not just inflation, but ridiculously high [[minimum wage]] rates that are reducing teen employment. Employers can't afford the state-mandated $18/hour for untrained kids. (Don't just quote the leftist Associated Press; try ''[[Fortune Magazine]]''. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:29, June 20, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/strategic-oil-reserve-nears-collapse Strategic Oil Reserve Nears Collapse…] US Must Choose: [[Guns or Butter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Iran not interested in buying U.S. Agricultural products with frozen funds: &amp;quot;We find it interesting that the goal of the war, which was announced as the destruction of Iranian civilization, has been reduced to enriching American farmers.&amp;quot; [https://x.com/IranObserver0/status/2069358914223718793]&lt;br /&gt;
:Comment: Can't blame them, given the [[inflated]] labor costs Americans would try to stick them with and the [[fact]] that they can get the same stuff from [[Russia]] cheaper.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==AI news==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/removing-ai-spyware-from-your-google-account.html Removing AI Spyware From Your Google Account].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://slaynews.com/young-woman-dies-doctors-let-ai-decide-whether-deserves-treatment/ Young Woman Dies After Doctors Let AI Decide Whether She Deserves Treatment]. Yet [[User:Conservative]] swears [[AI]] delivers the undisputable and irrefutable truth. The man cannot even recognize a profound [[moral]] question when it is before his face.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://slaynews.com/poll-finds-growing-numbers-americans-turning-against-ai-harms-society/ Poll Finds Growing Numbers of Americans Are Turning Against AI, Say It Harms Society].&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://slaynews.com/microsoft-ceo-warns-ai-hollow-out-entire-industries-automation-replaces-human-workers/ Microsoft CEO Warns AI Will ‘Hollow Out’ Entire Industries as Automation Replaces Human Workers].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Arms control==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bulletin of Atomic Scientists]]: [https://thebulletin.org/premium/2026-05/washington-should-pursue-trilateral-arms-control/ The United States, Russia, China, and arms control].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scott Ritter]]: [https://forumgeopolitica.com/article/shoot-the-dog Shoot the Dog].&lt;br /&gt;
:''Scott Ritter offers an analysis of the collapse of [[arms control]] and [[Europe]]'s drift toward [[militarism]], comparing the continent to an animal that has become uncontrollable and should be treated as such.''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bulletin of Atomic Scientists]]: [https://thebulletin.org/2026/05/irans-positions-at-the-npt-review-conference-are-rational-ignoring-them-would-weaken-the-treaty/#post-heading Iran’s positions at the NPT Review Conference are rational. Ignoring them would weaken the treaty].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==MAGA split==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/19/maga-influencers-white-house-daily-mail-report-foreign-influence-campaigns-israel-netanyahu-iran-us-deal/ MAGA Influencers Are Wearing Out Their White House Welcome].&lt;br /&gt;
:Loomer, &amp;quot;CJ Pearson, Rob Smith, Arynne Wexler, Emily Wilson (known as Emily Saves America) and Students for Trump co-founder Ryan Fournier&amp;quot;. [https://archive.ph/bWzlJ#selection-1367.84-1367.213]&lt;br /&gt;
::Note: the Rob Smith mentioned is not myself, although [[User:Conservative]] could be reported to [[Sebastian Gorka]]'s [[counterterrorism]] office as a [https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-thinks-ex-ally-tucker-151342902.html &amp;quot;leftwing extremist&amp;quot;] for his &amp;quot;pro-[[gay]], anti-[[Russian]]&amp;quot; sentiments. [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#User:Conservative.27s_obsession_with_homosexuality][https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Community_Portal&amp;amp;curid=114431&amp;amp;diff=2197193&amp;amp;oldid=2195684]  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sundance]]: '''[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/26/the-far-left-can-crush-republicans-in-midterms-if-they-just-give-professional-republicans-everything-they-want/ The Far Left Can Crush Republicans in Midterms if They Just Give Professional Republicans Everything They Want].'''&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;If the [[Communist]]s and [[Progressive]]s can put their [[crazy]] into a box for a few months, they will defeat their opposition.  [[Democrat]]s need to take a long summer vacation, stay completely silent, avoid anything [[political]] and surface again in late October.  That’s it. That’s all they need to do.  They can put every nickel of donations and fundraising in the bank and exit the 2026 midterms with billions in saved funds – But they’ve got to hide their crazy; I mean really hide it. '''The professional [[Republican Party]] in [[Washington DC]] [''Ed.:'' or &amp;quot;[[establishment]]&amp;quot; ] is completely disconnected from the [[American]] [[voter]], and more importantly from their base''' of support.  This creates a very unusual dynamic.  First, let me explain what Republican priorities the Democrats need to support:&lt;br /&gt;
:♦ '''Republicans will demand more [[Ukraine aid|funding for Ukraine]].'''  So, Democrats should give it to them. '''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Two-thirds of the American voters are against the&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;[[stupid]] spending on this nonsense [[NATO war in Ukraine|proxy war against Russia]].&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;'''  If Democrats quietly, silently, just '''let the [[GOP]] fund their [[proxy war]], &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;voters will punish them&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; [i.e., the professional Republican Party in Washington DC] ...&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
::*See also [[User:Conservative]] [[liberal style]] and [[GOP]] [[establishment]] priorities. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template%3AMainpageright&amp;amp;diff=2198004&amp;amp;oldid=2197979]&lt;br /&gt;
::*''[[Just the News]]'': '''[[Thune]] to face censure vote from [[South Dakota|SD]] GOP''' over [[SAVE America Act]]. [https://newsletters.justthenews.com/politics-policy/thune-face-censure-vote-sd-gop] &lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Sundance]] @ ''[[The Conservative Treehouse]]'' proven right again (recall, [[User:Conservative]] denigrated Sundance and ''The Conservative Treehouse'' as a bunch of &amp;quot;conspiracy nutjobs&amp;quot;; in addition, to [[foreign policy]], [[User:Conservative]] should be [[Topic ban]]ned again from election year [[domestic politics]] as he was in the [[2022 Midterms]]. He still has not learned his lesson.).&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://forumgeopolitica.com/article/the-deceived-society-how-the-population-is-indoctrinated-and-prepared-for-war The Deceived Society - How the population is indoctrinated and prepared for war].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==User:Conservative logic extrapolated==&lt;br /&gt;
There are over 300 [[gay bathhouse]]s in [[America]], and [[Donald Trump]] has done nothing to shut them down. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:42, June 11, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Grok: Does User:Conservative of Conservapedia apparently have an affinity for gay bath houses?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, [[User:Conservative]], a long-time administrator and prolific editor on Conservapedia since 2007, has demonstrated '''an apparent affinity for the topic of gay bathhouses through repeated contributions'''...These fit into a broader pattern where '''roughly 10–15% of their recent edits (out of hundreds) focus on Russia-related topics, blending geopolitical critique with niche details on LGBTQ+ &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;suppression&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; under Vladimir Putin.&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:46, June 15, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]] is an admitted [[troll]], incapable of intelligent discussion who confesses that the reaction to his [[harassment]] of other editors [https://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:User_complaints#Admitted_troll makes him feel &amp;quot;alive&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]] eschewing the endorsement of his claim to fame by the [[United States Justice Department]] in favor of [[Lewis Black]] tells a neutral observer everything they need to know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sweet... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/428489 short and sweet].[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:32, June 11, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool. Read it in [[NYP]]. Kudos Seinfeld.[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 19:25, June 11, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The &amp;quot;Peacemongers&amp;quot; are in Canada too ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/428518 Iranian-backed terror network linked to fatal shooting of Toronto police officer].&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 23:26, June 11, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Andrew Korybko]]: [[Laura Loomer]] &amp;amp; [[MAGA]] Like Her Are Wrong: “MAGA Dissidents” Aren’t A &amp;quot;Russian Influence Op&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Led by Laura Loomer, MAGA’s claim that “MAGA dissidents” like [[Candace Owens|Candace]], [[Tucker]], and now [[Tulsi]], as many of them consider her to be, are part of a “[[Russian influence operation]]” is discrediting, and this [[conspiracy theory]] is ironically similar in spirit to Candace’s conspiracy theories that they mock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outgoing [[Director of National Intelligence]] [[Tulsi Gabbard]] released four partially declassified pages pertaining to [[US-funded Ukrainian biolabs]]. Readers can watch her announcement here, read the press release here, and access the documents here. There’s nothing new therein, just a reaffirmation that these labs exist and are indeed funded by the US, but her move set off another [[social media]] debate between Trump’s MAGA movement and what can be described as so-called “MAGA dissidents”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first is led online by Laura Loomer nowadays while the second can be considered jointly led by [[Candace Owens]] and [[Tucker Carlson]]. Former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center [[Joe Kent]] has since joined the ranks of the “MAGA dissidents” following his resignation that reportedly preceded what would have otherwise been his firing. Laura and many MAGA believe that Tulsi, who hired Joe, is also a “MAGA dissident”. Her unexpected biolabs disclosure sealed the deal for many of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ironically, despite [[MAGA]] having been accused by the [[Democrat]]s over the past decade of being a “Russian influence operation” (RIO) and Trump to this day still being seen by them as “[[Putin]]’s puppet”, Laura and many other MAGA nowadays conspiracy theorize that the “MAGA dissidents” are RIOs....&amp;quot; [https://korybko.substack.com/p/laura-loomer-and-maga-like-her-are]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: It was [[User:Conservative]], like [[transgender]] pretender [[Laura Loomer]] [https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/a76cfo/mossad_agent_laura_loomer_before_he_became_a_woman/], who took the lead in smearing MAGA as a RIO in [[Conservapedia]] following [[Hillary Clinton]] &amp;amp; the [[Democrat]]s' direction. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:13, June 13, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Is Andrew Korybko anti [[US]]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:54, June 13, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::No. He's only given one interview that I know of. Oddly, he's a Pole resident in Moscow. Recently he published an article with some personal views, [https://korybko.substack.com/p/heres-why-im-a-proud-volhynia-genocide Here’s Why I’m A Proud Volhynia Genocide Activist]. From his perch at Moscow University, he gives us some of the most timely and insightful views on Russian [[foreign policy]] and internal politics. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:51, June 13, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''[[Times of India]]'': [https://youtu.be/Qu9qzAyMM3E HUGE WIN For Putin: Tulsi Gabbard EXPOSES 40+ US-Funded Biolabs In Ukraine | ‘Anthrax, Ebola…’]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Govt Advisors SHRED Documents Detailing Fauci Obama-Era Work With Wuhan Lab.PNG|right|275px|thumb|In February 2022 it was reported that government advisors shredded documents detailing the Obama administration's work with the Wuhan Lab.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The reports say nothing about how the [[Zelensky regime]] - with [[US]] tax dollar support - murdered [[Russia]]'s chief investigator into [[US biolabs in Ukraine]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:18, June 13, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As [[Andrew Korybko]] rightly observed, [https://www.dni.gov/files/BIOLAB_Slides.pdf &amp;quot;There’s nothing new therein&amp;quot;] which was reported in our [[U.S. funded biological labs abroad]] article. But [[User:Conservative]]'s [[trolling]], with Andy's consent, cut off any further expansion on the subject more than two years ago, [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:57, June 14, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Andrew Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/tulsis-us-funded-ukrainian-biolabs Tulsi’s US-Funded Ukrainian Biolabs Disclosure Is Incredibly Important To The National Debate]===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Many [[MAGA]] remember being defamed as “[[Russian]] [[propagandist]]s” for believing this.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
It matters little now that the damage is done, and rather than an enforceable [[policy]] solution to deal with [[User:Conservative]]'s [[harassment]] and [[trolling]] of editors, we have a [[software]] solution that takes 15 minutes to fix a typo. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:57, June 14, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It’s unthinkable that the [[Democrat]]s would ever fight amongst themselves like [[MAGA]] is doing. For instance, no prominent member of their movement on Laura’s level would ever condemn a Democrat official for revealing that [[Trump 1.0]] or [[Trump 2.0|2.0]] lied about something of [[international]] significance, let alone accuse them and those who agree with the [[fact]]s that they shared of being part of a foreign influence operation. This is unique to MAGA due to '''the many petty personal feuds within this movement.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;'''The [[Democrat]]s have every reason to exploit these divisions''' ahead of [[2026 Midterms|November’s midterms]] and then of course going into the [[2028 presidential election]] in an attempt to recapture control of the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;and they will, given the millions of bytes of [[liberal claptrap]] on this issue that Andy has allowed [[User:Conservative]] to pollute [[Conservapedia]] with&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;While Russia dislikes Trump reneging on the “Spirit of Anchorage”, which is understood to refer to him promising Putin to coerce Zelensky into withdrawing from [[Donbass]] in exchange for ceasing hostilities, [[Republican]]s overall tend to be relatively (keyword) more [[pragmatic]] towards [[Russia]] than Democrats.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://slaynews.com/report-obama-involved-foreign-biolabs-developing-deadly-pathogens/ Report: Obama ‘Involved’ in Foreign Biolabs Developing Deadly Pathogens]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama biolabs.PNG|right|300px|thumb|[https://archive.is/Ao20N| Biolabs in Ukraine]. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
I have much I could add to this &amp;quot;incredibly important issue to the national debate&amp;quot;, only I don't have time to deal with [[User:Conservative]]'s [[idiocy]] nor Andy's refusal to do anything about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:05, June 15, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Who Was [[MI6]]’s Inside Man Against [[Donald Trump]]? [[Pompeo]] Unmasked===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;[[SARS-CoV-2]], which we now accept in hindsight was a U.S. military and intelligence operation utilizing a virus created in a [[Wuhan, China]] biological lab. The global response to the virus was a combined military and intelligence operation. The most excessive ‘[[western]]’ reactions to the virus were carried out by New Zealand, Australia, the U.K and Canada, all [[five-eyes]] countries.  The November 2020 election result was specifically an outcome of the virus and fraudulent mail-in ballots.&amp;quot; [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/13/pompeo-unmasked/?lctg=66158495]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://newstarget.com/2026-06-24-five-eyes-ai-cyber-attacks-cripple-governments.html Five Eyes Warns: AI Cyber Attacks Could Cripple Governments “Within Months”].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Loomer predicts false flag attack in US to kill peace deal===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://youtu.be/Vlix1UrPAcA] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==America kills Indian sailors==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[United States]] killed three [[Indian]] sailors to enforce [[Iranian]] sanctions. This was equally as [[stupid]] as killing the 86-year-old Pope of [[Shia]] [[Islam]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the [[US]] does not even [[import]] any [[Persian Gulf]] oil. Nor did we win any support or accolades from &amp;quot;allies&amp;quot;, India, Australia, Japan, South Korea and others who depend on Persian Gulf oil. Whose idea was this? Trump? Hegseth?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not how to win friends and influence people. It is the bluster and [[false]] [[pride]] in [[User:Conservative]]'s [[idiot]]ic [[trolling]] screeds that motivates such behavior. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, June 14, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This is going to be a big problem for the United States. I think India US relationships is going to be an issue here. The US is trying to use India more and more as a trading partner. Trying to use India to do repairs for US naval forces out in the region. The loss of access into the Persian Gulf means that repair facilities are limited for the US in that region. India is really the fallback. If not, you're heading to Singapore and the US is finding it very difficult to maintain naval forces out in the Persian Gulf. They are having to commit a large portion of its chartered tanker fleet and auxiliary vessels to keep two carrier battle groups, an amphibious strike group and another amphibious strike group put into a position where they can operate in this region. It is difficult and it is causing a strain and I don't care what the Navy says. I know what's happening here. It is very difficult to conduct this operation over a protracted period of time. There is a finite number to this and they're going to have to readjust and figure out how to continue this operation and India is really key for that. India is a great staging base. You can get supplies, you can do repairs. And obviously these strikes against these vessels that are violating the US blockade and have Indian crew members on board is important one to figure out. [https://youtu.be/xosw8iFTzsc]}}&lt;br /&gt;
We're off on the wrong foot after the loss of Persian Gulf bases. We could lose the whole [[Indian Ocean]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:34, June 14, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We've actually previously discussed this. Vertical launch [[Tomahawk cruise missile]]s from US ships, such as were launched at [[Iran]] to kill 168 school girls, cannot be reloaded at sea. It will take a long time &amp;quot;in the foreseeable future&amp;quot; for the Indian government to convince the Indian people that allowing US bases in India, after the US having demonstrated no respect or regard for the life of Indian people, is a good or advantageous idea. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:43, June 14, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mark Wauck]]: [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/text-of-mou-released-major-geopolitical]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|with regard to the facilitation of the full development of the [[International North–South Transport Corridor]]. As we’ve discussed numerous times in the past, it’s simply impossible to over-estimate the importance of this initiative. '''Based on stupid actions by the US during its [[Epic Fury|war on Iran]]—&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;especially the murder of Indian sailors&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;'''—I strongly believe that this will lead to a tighter integration of [[India]] and [[Pakistan]] with [[BRICS]]—as well as all [[GCC|the Gulf states]]. The US simply can’t compete with this. This is as much a victory for BRICS as it is for Iran, and it’s ipso facto a major defeat for [[Anglo]]-[[Zionist]] [[financial]]-[[military]] [[hegemony]].}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;stupid actions&amp;quot; in the sphere of [[American foreign policy]]. This is one big reason I'm so critical of Andy allowing [[User:Conservative]]'s [[spam]] and [[trolling]] and not abiding by a [[Topic Ban]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:54, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chris Martenson]] Does A Bit Of Big Picture On [[Iran war|Trump's War]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|So,...only the [[US]] gets to shoot at ships, nobody else? I’m thinking of the Iranian color guard ship and the mass murder of the unarmed sailors. Or perhaps the Iranian fishing boats struck last night.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/martenson-does-a-bit-of-big-picture More]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arizona Democratic Candidate Cast As Rural Working Mom Is a Millionaire Consultant With Deep Soros Ties, Wants Sex Work Decriminalized To Help ‘Trans Women of Color’ ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arizona Democratic Candidate Cast As Rural Working Mom Is a Millionaire Consultant With Deep Soros Ties, Wants Sex Work Decriminalized To Help ‘Trans Women of Color’&lt;br /&gt;
Free Beacon | June 15, 2026 | Andrew Kerr.&lt;br /&gt;
JoAnna Mendoza owns stake in a political consulting firm worth up to $5 million.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://freebeacon.com/democrats/arizona-democratic-candidate-cast-as-rural-working-mom-is-a-millionaire-consultant-with-deep-soros-ties-wants-sex-work-decriminalized-to-help-trans-women-of-color/]&lt;br /&gt;
Or the color of...money![[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 17:10, June 15, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The case of Christian ex cop who dared to criticize Islamofascism... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex-Police Officer Settles Christian Discrimination Case in the UK&lt;br /&gt;
NTD Good Morning. Jun-16-2026.&lt;br /&gt;
Former British police officer Luke Salmons has reached a legal settlement after claiming he faced discrimination because of his Christian beliefs. Salmons says he was suspended after questioning aspects of Islam and raising concerns during workplace training sessions&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.ntd.com/ntdplus/ex-police-officer-settles-christian-discrimination-case-in-the-uk_1152761.html][[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 10:44, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lebanese President Joseph Aoun's Dramatic Declarations Of Sovereignty: Lebanon Belongs To The Lebanese, Not To Iran ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MEMRI&lt;br /&gt;
@MEMRIReports&lt;br /&gt;
Jun 14&lt;br /&gt;
#ICYMI: [[Lebanese]] President Joseph Aoun's Dramatic Declarations Of Sovereignty: #Lebanon Belongs To The Lebanese, Not To #Iran; We Want To Live In Peace And Not Die In [[Iran]]'s Wars - Report &amp;amp; audio here ow.ly/LqRH50ZaC2X #MEMRI&lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/MEMRIReports/status/2066200995785539635][[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 14:50, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Trump on [[FOX]] today:&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I tell you what – Israel is fighting Hizbullah too long and too many people are being killed. And you don’t have to knock down an apartment house every time you are looking for somebody. Because there are a lot of people in those apartment houses and not all are Hizbullah. That I can tell you.&amp;quot; [https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398549901112] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:10, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, he has to throw some bones at Qatar &amp;amp; co., especially in the G7 meeting...and he also suggested [[Syria]]'s A Sharaa goes in and clean Hezbollah because he did it so fast in his own country.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:28, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::True. [[MoA]] breaks down how [[Trump]] may be trying to incite more [[Sunni]]/[[Shia]] sectarian [[violence]] like in the good ol' days of the [[Islamic State]]. [https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/06/lebanon-u-s-offers-to-ignite-sectarian-war.html] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:41, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*''[[Zerohedge]]'': [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-vance-virtually-sign-us-iran-deal-hormuz-fears-ease-energy-flows-remain-months Deal Doubts Arise As Lebanese, Iranian Officials Say US Must Rein In Israel To Secure Regional Peace].&lt;br /&gt;
::So evidently the criticism by Lebanese officials isn't just against Iran. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:22, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Update: [https://youtu.be/A1ic3tpmRtk?t=305 &amp;quot;What Marco Rubio told Aoun, the head of Lebanon, who's not his own man if you'll pardon the pun...&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
So much for &amp;quot;[[sovereignty]]&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:17, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Days before the UFC massacre plot for a &amp;quot;revolution,&amp;quot; [[Tucker Carlson]] incited for revolution  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/nosoup4knowles/status/2065430772329091266 June 12, 2026].&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|Tucker Carlson claims he doesn't want a violent revolution while simultaneously telling Americans &amp;quot;there's no way for them to nonviolently change the system&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/nosoup4knowles/status/2065430772329091266]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tucker also spoke about a revolution months ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:25, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(A) Pretty weak link between Tucker and what appears to be another garden variety [[FBI]] [[psyop]] or [[false flag]]; (B) Tucker obviously in the same clip disavows [[violence]] and is referring to how others can/may react, etc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:33, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* So which is it, a &amp;quot;weak link&amp;quot; or a so called &amp;quot;false flag&amp;quot;? He knows he has a dangerous mic. &amp;quot;Disavowed violence&amp;quot;? more like a KKK saying &amp;quot;kill the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;juice&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, in order not to be arrested...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:48, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Update: [https://youtu.be/tX5ygvEr3Y8 FBI Whistleblower Explains Foiled UFC Plot: Bona Fide Plan or Gretchen Whitmer Fed-Napping 2.0?] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:41, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He is &amp;quot;just asking questions&amp;quot; &amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;innocent&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt; Tucker ... 👀 😂 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Did Tucker Carlson Decide That ‘America First’ Means Supporting Iran?&lt;br /&gt;
By Ben M. Freeman. June 16, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2012, Tucker Carlson described the Islamic Republic of Iran as “evil” and its leaders as “lunatics.” He even argued that the Iranian regime “deserves to be annihilated.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the time, Carlson recognized a reality that remains unchanged today: the Islamic Republic is not a normal state pursuing normal state interests. It is a revolutionary regime built on repression, proxy warfare, and regional destabilization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What makes Carlson’s evolution particularly striking is that he is often presented as one of the leading voices of the America First movement. Iran is not merely an adversary of Israel. For nearly half a century, the Islamic Republic has defined itself in opposition to the United States, funded groups responsible for killing Americans, attacked American interests across the Middle East, and built a foreign policy around hostility toward both Washington and its allies.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.algemeiner.com/2026/06/16/when-did-tucker-carlson-decide-that-america-first-means-supporting-iran/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:45, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, you can take all the Tucker trashing and transfer it to Trump now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:19, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''[[Human Events]]'' ([[Ronald Reagan]]'s favorite rag): [https://humanevents.com/2026/06/16/breaking-trump-slams-israel-over-hezbollah-war-says-strikes-on-civilian-buildings-too-destructive ''BREAKING'': Trump slams Israel over Hezbollah war, says strikes on civilian buildings 'too destructive']. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:00, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump thought bashing Bibi will earn him points at G7. It didn't. Besides the bosses of the ME Qatar giving a smile , it did absolutely Zero.&lt;br /&gt;
Here is son of Hamas founder the Green Prince criticizing Trump. https://x.com/MosabHasanYOSEF/status/2066896274016579967 [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:40, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Updates:'''&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/netanyahu-will-reportedly-blackmail Netanyahu Will Reportedly BLACKMAIL Trump To Block Any Iran Deal], Jun 16, 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''[[Forbes]]'': [https://youtu.be/VnYTn3DkuZw Epstein Was Trying To Offer Prosecutors Dirt On Trump], Jun 16, 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Conspiracy theories]], anyone? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:14, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::&lt;br /&gt;
1. &lt;br /&gt;
Iran with its PressTV, Hezbollah all sided with Tucker. You can be against the war but one doesn't have to advocate FOR Iran like Tucker did.&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Macron]] pressured Trump over [[Ukraine]]. Frustrated.[https://thehill.com/policy/international/5926350-macron-zelensky-trump-g7-summit/] As a diversion tactic Trump criticized Netanyahu,  but it failed to gain him any favor in G7.&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
Dear RobS, When you post these BS theories, do you believe in them?[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 00:05, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh no. But the timing is awful. ''Forbes'' can't retract the BS they evidently have now placed in people's minds. And it's hard for ''Forbes'' to argue the timing is coincidental. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's imagine for a minute it's all true, Epstein was a Mossad agent, Bibi holds the dirt on Trump, etc etc. How would releasing it inspire Americans of whatever political stripe to wanna go kill Iranians and destroy the evil mullocracy? No. It's only of interest to low IQ [[partisan]] voters ([[Republican]]s are not the only ones to have low IQ partisans like [[User:Conservative]]) as payback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Bottomline: It is impossible to fight and win a [[war]] with [[partisan]] divisions in the [[population]]. Trashing left-right, liberal-conservative, Democrat-Republican does more harm to a war effort than [[anti-Semitism]] or open sympathy for the Iran regime.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:13, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:;Re that BS you posted, the Russia/Russia hoax Dossier also said the same theory about Trump that [[Putin]] blackmails him...LOL [[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 00:31, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yep. I can hear it now already on election eve in November, &amp;quot;Epstein tried to give the Trump [[DOJ]] the dirt on Trump but they killed him...&amp;quot;. etc. It takes the heat off Clinton &amp;amp; the [[Democrat]]s and puts it on Trump and the [[Republican]]s. Doesn't help Bibi &amp;amp; the [[Likud]] much in America. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:38, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Despite MOU:&lt;br /&gt;
[[IRGC]] launching nightly drone strikes on ships in Hormuz.&lt;br /&gt;
::::&lt;br /&gt;
UPDATE.&lt;br /&gt;
Iran has fired drones at commercial ships in Strait of Hormuz since signing of MoU.&lt;br /&gt;
The source added that all of the drones had been intercepted by the US military before they pose a threat to commercial or US military ships and personnel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Claim: 'Iran won't get unfrozen funds without behavior changes'. In an interview, Vice President JD Vance downplays criticism of the US-Iran deal, explaining that regional investment is conditional on Iran changing its behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘Without me, there would be no Israel,’ Trump says at G7 to a smiling Qatar representative. Ambassador Huckabee defies Trump, claims US would not exist with Israel. &amp;quot;It is your heritage, without a doubt,&amp;quot; he said, &amp;quot;but it is also the heritage of the United States. Without Israel, without the Jewish foundation, there would not be America.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:07, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/trump-to-israel-let-the-al-qaeda-guy-handle-hezbollah/ Trump to Israel: Let the al-Qaeda Guy Handle Hezbollah][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 01:58, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conflicts Forum]]: [https://conflictsforum.substack.com/p/trump-crosses-the-rubicon-his-strategic 'Trump crosses the Rubicon; His strategic goal is a new chapter in US–Iran relations'].&lt;br /&gt;
::Comment: You can say it's motivated by [[domestic politics]] &amp;amp; [[2026 Midterms]], (which it is, as [[American foreign policy]] has always been), but there's no going back. 47 years of [[demonizing]] [[Iran]] is over. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:12, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohhh. The innocent mullah regime. 47 years of bloody crimes.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 02:22, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Compare this to his efforts to make nice with [[Kim jong-un]] during [[Trump 1.0]]. He want's something like this for his legacy. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:27, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ohhh. The innocent mullah regime. 47 years of bloody crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
*Exporting and setting up its strongholds in:&lt;br /&gt;
*Venezuela (till Maduro capture)&lt;br /&gt;
*Nicaragua (still)&lt;br /&gt;
*Argentina (in the 1990s, AMIA bombing and more)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lebanon (still)&lt;br /&gt;
*Yemen (still)&lt;br /&gt;
*Sudan (still)&lt;br /&gt;
*Iraq (still)&lt;br /&gt;
*Syria (till A Sharaa)&lt;br /&gt;
* Somalia (Quds force)&lt;br /&gt;
* Europe (especially right now via its proxy terror gangs ([[HAYI]])[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Americans are tired of fighting other people's wars. Hell, with the deep [[partisan]] divisions, they wouldn't even take up guns to defend their own god-given [[constitution]]al [[right]] to [[gay marriage]] anymore. (Call me a cynic). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Take [[France]], for example. We fought [[World War I]], [[World War II]], and the [[Vietnam war]] for the 'Glory of France', and look at France today. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:40, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::No gratitude in France. I believe.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:40, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sadly. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:01, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Update:''' [[Sky News]]: [[Iran war]] 'the end' for [[Trump]]: [[Tucker Carlson]] on [[Musk]], [[MAGA]] &amp;amp; the [[UK]]. [https://youtu.be/ZWgtXhhL6TY]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 15 Antifa radicals indicted, 12 arrested in sweeping federal probe into Minneapolis anti-ICE operations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15 Antifa radicals indicted, 12 arrested in sweeping federal probe into Minneapolis anti-ICE operations.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/15-antifa-radicals-indicted-12-arrested-sweeping-federal-probe-minneapolis-anti-ice-operations]. Finally some steps. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 02:20, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:As I said, there's no winning wars with [[partisan]] divisions in the population, and this widens the gap. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:33, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== JD Vance's steal of a deal? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:JD Vance - Steal of a deal. Doubts.jpg|thumb|JD Vance - Steal of a deal? Doubts.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I hope for peace, but strong doubts remain'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Trump’s Cabinet Hates the Iran Deal.&lt;br /&gt;
CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth all have voiced doubts about Iran’s commitment not to build a nuclear weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio and Hegseth speak to press.&lt;br /&gt;
Malcolm Ferguson. June 16, 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
CIA Director John Ratcliffe and others within the Trump administration don’t think Iran is being serious about its promise not to develop or attain nuclear weapons, according to anonymous sources from Axios.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://newrepublic.com/post/211913/trump-cabinet-hates-iran-deal TNR][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:51, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've heard the same thing - you have Radcliffe, Rubio, and Hegseth on one side with Trump &amp;amp; JD on the other. Wonder who will win that contest? Also, maybe half the $300 billion has been transferred already. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:03, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Breaking Points]]: [https://youtu.be/dhdgaPnCEhg Trump SLAMS Bibi As CIA LEAKS BEGIN].&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;[[CIA]] director, [[John Ratcliffe]], “told Trump and other senior officials intelligence gathered by the US raised serious doubts about Iran’s willingness to make nuclear concessions as the US is seeking a final deal.” You are going to see perhaps the greatest [[Deep State]] [[leak]] operation of all time,&amp;quot; [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/mother-of-all-leak-wars-beginning Transcript]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:08, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
* You already posted yesterday Trump's comments. Even liberals [https://i.ibb.co/pvgHgCN1/IMG-20260617-WA0000.jpg mock] Trump &amp;quot;criticizing&amp;quot; Bibi as sad pandering to his Arab masters in Doha.&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump wants Syria to clean out Hezbollah Iran's trash from Lebanon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About numbers of &amp;quot;people killed&amp;quot;, let's not go into [https://thehill.com/opinion/international/4894462-is-britains-green-foreign-policy-innovative-or-mere-posturing/ 618,000] in [[Syria]] by Alawite/Hezbollah/Iran/Putin 2011-2024. Or current 400k deaths - upto [https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine 1.8 million] casualties between both sides in [[Russia]]/[[Ukraine]] war 2022-2026.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But let's recall Trump's words about [[Syria]]'s Al-Sharaa and [[Hezbollah]]:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:C9Pak4-W0AIldKy (1).jpg|right|450px|thumb|[http://www.defenddemocracy.org/a-conversation-with-jake-sullivan-video/ Jake Sullivan to Hillary Clinton]: Al Qaeda is on our side.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Trump said that he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to “let Syria take care of” Hezbollah. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“To be honest with you, I think they’d do a better job of doing it,” Trump said alongside Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the emir of Qatar, during a Group of Seven meeting in France.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The president specifically praised Ahmed al-Sharaa, the president of Syria. Al-Sharaa took over the country after longtime Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad fled to Moscow when rebel troops entered Damascus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Trump noted that al-Sharaa, a former member of al-Qaeda, is “not a boy scout,” he praised the Syrian president for unifying the Middle Eastern country after its nearly 14-year civil war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“He’s very good with Hezbollah, does not like them,” the president said of al-Sharra. “And I’ll tell you what, Israel’s [been] fighting Hezbollah too long and too many people are being killed.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5928503-trump-vance-iran-deal/  Trump jokes he’ll blame Vance if Iran deal doesn’t work out]. June 17, 2026.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:01, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What happened to [https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/288#Dems._Anti-Trump_leads_to_anti-Bibi_-_.28Face_the_Nation_4.19.26.29 &amp;quot;to be anti-Trump is to be anti-Bibi?&amp;quot;] It makes as much sense as Bibi saying &amp;quot;[[Hamas]] is [[ISIS]]&amp;quot;. Trump now sounds like [[John Bolton]], [[Jake Sullivan]], and [[Hillary Clinton]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:44, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Not really.  Are you telling me that Trump can't change his mind from one day to the other? Are you asking: Did Israel lose much by Bibi putting it all in Trump basket? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not sure how a (temporary or not) disagreement between the two suddenly changes all this. Furthermore.  Even if there will be a &amp;quot;breakup&amp;quot;,  it won't change the past of dragging Bibi down by anti Trump foes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hamas]] is still like ISIS which is why they [https://www.israelhayom.com/2023/10/11/911623/ carried] [[ISIS]] flag on Oct 7 and [https://jcfa.org/hamass-propaganda-videos-an-old-new-tool-of-psychological-warfare/ copied] ISIS methods of filming own atrocities. &lt;br /&gt;
I think Bibi did a lot of mistakes in his life but calling Hamas ISIS wasn't one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I don't get your word salad what you put these all in one blender...or is it just copy pasted line from some substack?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it's good that '''Israel didn't sign anything on the MoU'''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next let's see about the nukes. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Takeaways from Trump news conference on Iran deal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author : CBS News · June 17, 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure. Well,''' the president has been making some pretty grandiose claims all week here in Evian about the things that this one and a halfpage agreement will accomplish. Most notably, he says it will prevent Iran from ever getting a nuclear weapon. But he hasn't explained how exactly the deal will do that. And the drafts that have been circulating, you know only mention Iran's nuclear program a couple of times.&lt;br /&gt;
The rest of the document deals with the Straight of Hormuz, deals with sanctions, unfreezing assets and things like that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And so I just wanted to ask him directly, why are you claiming that this particular deal is going to prevent Iran from ever getting a nuclear weapon?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And he said, well, if they try to get a nuclear weapon, then we'll just bomb them, which may be the case, but that's not the same as a deal that enforces it.&lt;br /&gt;
So, I followed up by asking him, if there's anything enforcable in this deal, any kind of mechanism that prevents Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
And he kind of blew it off.&lt;br /&gt;
He said, &amp;quot;Well, what do you want me to do?&lt;br /&gt;
Sue them or take them to court? What kind of enforcement are you talking about?&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the reality is, that the two sides are about to embark on a lengthy negotiation that will involve enforcable benchmarks. That would be enforced by the US, enforced by international agencies to hopefully ensure that Iran doesn't begin nuclear development again. And whether that negotiation will be successful is still up in the air, but it's pretty clear that this memorandum of understanding does not do what President Trump claims it does, preventing Iran from ever getting a nuclear weapon.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jg11AL-hTl4][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:22, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nobody cares. We all understand we have been massively lied to at the start of this this war in February 2026. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:03, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The moral question of who can possess a nuclear weapon===&lt;br /&gt;
:Iranian nukes is a non-issue. After the murder of the global [[Shia]] spiritual leader, nobody is going to bow their head, give up their [[sovereignty]], and bow to the [[American]] crusade for &amp;quot;god-given&amp;quot; [[gay rights]] &amp;quot;for the foreseeable future&amp;quot;. [[User:Conservative]] and I discussed this personally several times on the phone 3 and 4 years ago. He took the side of continuing to spread [[gay rights]] through [[economic sanctions]] and [[blackmail]] as the cornerstone of [[American foreign policy]] &amp;quot;for the foreseeable future&amp;quot;. (Unless a country de-criminalizes [[homosexuality]] and [[legal]]izes [[gay marriage]], they are put on the [[State Department]]'s list of &amp;quot;[[human rights]] abusers&amp;quot; subject to [[economic sanctions|sanctions]]; you would think [[Conservapedia]]'s expert on [[homosexuality]] would know this. Instead, he's a vociferous advocate of more of it -- and through [[violence]]). I told him it can't happen through murder &amp;amp; [[violence]], and remonstrated him for his [[racist]] and [[white supremacy|supremacist]] attitudes and lack of respect toward the people of the rest of the planet. He hasn't changed his position.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for Grants to Support the Needs of the LGBTQI+ Community.PNG|600px|right|thumb|After [[bullying]] a country with [[economic sanctions]] to [[legal]]ize [[gay rights]] with threats to add them to the [[State Department]]'s list of &amp;quot;human rights abusers&amp;quot; if they do not, the [[United States]] [[escalate]]s to openly interfering in their [[domestic|domestic affairs]]. [https://www.mishcon.com/news/lgbt-history-month-the-use-of-sanctions-against-lgbt-human-rights-abuses] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
:Like a drunk or drug addict, America is in need of an intervention through [[diplomacy]] for its own sake. We evidently are incapable of reforming ourselves as &amp;quot;the example to the world&amp;quot;.  The [[society]] that [[legal]]ized [[gay marriage]] is not going to dictate to the rest of the planet who [[moral]]ly can and cannot have a [[nuclear weapon]] (that makes a mockery of everything [[God]] has taught us). That is the attitude of the rest of the planet toward America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The rest of the world doesn't hate us, they are just tired of our [[bully]]ing, threats, and mindless use of [[military]] force. An intervention is the only thing that could save us from losing the [[dollar]] [[reserve currency]] status.  Let's hope America responds to a diplomatic intervention before nobody wants to do business in the [[dollar]] anymore. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:37, June 27, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Did Trump see the disastrous (JD Vance's) MoU before agreeing to it? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From [https://thatthingtoo.blogspot.com/2026/06/did-trump-see-disastrous-mou-before.html ABC blog]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It's entirely possible that Trump, the &amp;quot;Art of the Deal&amp;quot; master, never saw the details of the MoU --brokered by fake &amp;quot;friends&amp;quot; Qatar/Pakistan-- before blindly placing his confidence in JD Vance. Yet virtually no one argues that this deal is good for America. There is broad consensus across Republicans, Democrats, conservatives, and many others that the sole beneficiary would be Iran's oppressive regime and its jihadist proxies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No one believes that the $300 billion would simply be spent on &amp;quot;reconstruction.&amp;quot; Just like the regime has been doing with Obama's cash release for its annihilation nuclear program, ballistic missiles, shahed drones and other destructive weaponry; maintain and boost its jihadi proxies in Yemen, Lebanon, Iraq, Gaza, Africa, etc; spread its diabolic ideology globally; sent gangs in Europe on terror or/and murderous spree, plots and violent operations targeting dissidents and opponents abroad and attacking US and its allies with cyber attacks, among others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See genocidal Islamist government - Hamas in Gaza, prioritizing its military infrastructure, terror tunnels and weapons over the welfare of its people, while using civilians as human shields and exposing them to the consequences of its actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the details were truly so beneficial, why were they kept from public scrutiny? It's no surprise that JD Vance chose to keep the most controversial provisions under wraps. The secrecy itself raises serious questions about what supporters of the agreement did not want the public to see.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
True. Every. Word.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 12:29, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess Trump's just an [[idiot]] who doesn't know, understand or care about the consequences of what he's doing, huh?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The big news here of course is that [[Witkoff]] &amp;amp; [[Kushner]] got fired, and JD negotiated the deal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:04, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::JD Vance embarrassingly admits he does not understand diplomatic protocols when asked about Iran deal. During a morning show interview, the vice president claimed that there are simply “some diplomatic protocols” that he can’t fully comprehend.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.irishstar.com/news/us-news/jd-vance-embarrassingly-admits-not-37312221]. &lt;br /&gt;
Note. You can oppose the war in Iran but you don't have to be a total loser.[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 14:54, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Neither do [[Trump]] or [[Zelensky]] understand [[diplomatic]] protocols. They both thought bilateral agreements begin with summits. Whereas summits are actually the termination point to [[ratify]] agreements worked out by the [[sherpa]]s. This MOU is closer to traditional diplomacy than what Trump has practiced and Zelenksy has proposed over the past several years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:59, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Why Trump’s Iran Deal Is A Disaster For The US | Gerard Baker.&lt;br /&gt;
Times News.&lt;br /&gt;
Jun 18, 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
The State Of It USA Podcast.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Trump has made a deal with Iran. On Friday, Vice President JD Vance will attend the official signing in Geneva of a 14-point US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding that covers the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's nuclear ambitions, the lifting of sanctions, a $300bn reconstruction fund for Iran and a ceasefire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deal has gone down badly in the US, and with good reason. Gerry argues that it's a calamity for America and a betrayal of the Iranian people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could it also be the undoing of JD Vance? It looks like he's been set up as the fall guy in case this all goes wrong. That could scupper his presidential ambitions. And where does it leave Israel? Donald Trump was Israel's ally but with this deal, has he abandoned them?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Katy Balls, Washington editor and columnist at The Times and The Sunday Times&lt;br /&gt;
Gerard Baker, columnist at The Times and editor at large at The Wall Street Journal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Producer: Harry Kitson&lt;br /&gt;
Executive producer: Molly Guinness&lt;br /&gt;
Picture: Getty Images&lt;br /&gt;
Audio: Times Radio, Reuters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
00:00 - Why The Iran Deal is a Calamity&lt;br /&gt;
00:37 - Breaking Down the 14-Point Peace Agreement&lt;br /&gt;
01:54 - The $300 Billion &amp;quot;Reparations&amp;quot; Fund Explained&lt;br /&gt;
03:04 - &amp;quot;An Almighty Raspberry&amp;quot;: The Republican Backlash&lt;br /&gt;
04:05 - Inside the G7 Victory Lap vs. American Reality&lt;br /&gt;
06:26 - A Disastrous Blow to America’s Global Prestige&lt;br /&gt;
07:17 - Broken Promises &amp;amp; Betrayal of the Iranian Protesters&lt;br /&gt;
09:18 - Reza Pahlavi Interview: A Missed Window of Opportunity&lt;br /&gt;
11:04 - A Seismic Rift in the US-Israel Relationship&lt;br /&gt;
14:26 - J.D. Vance: Master Architect or Ultimate Fall Guy?&lt;br /&gt;
16:41 - The Core MAGA Position on &amp;quot;Forever Wars&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
17:48 - Economic Silver Linings: Oil Prices, Inflation &amp;amp; Interest Rates&lt;br /&gt;
22:33 - How Trump’s Rivals Will Use This in the 2028 Primary&lt;br /&gt;
26:12 - Outro: Navigating the 60-Day Negotiation Window&lt;br /&gt;
[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vVDOLSsDxek]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ari Hoffman:&lt;br /&gt;
- JD Vance Shills For His Disastrous MOU.&lt;br /&gt;
- Katie Wilson orders cleanups after our reporting.&lt;br /&gt;
- WA unemployment above the national average.&lt;br /&gt;
- Dems aren't proud to be American.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.facebook.com/AriHoffmanOfficial/videos/are-you-proud-to-be-an-american/1863009317996271/][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 21:41, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The [[United States]] does not have the manpower, weapons, or industrial capacity for a different outcome. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:52, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reconstruction fund===&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|:Para 6: &amp;quot;The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least U.S.D. 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mechanism for the implementation of this plan will be finalized as part of a final deal within 60 days. All required '''licenses, waivers and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions''' will be granted by the United States of America.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Infrastructure deals are extremely complex and very high fee and would require Iran to convey title of the assets being “reconstructed” to the fund, which is na ga happen. It is hard to see how the US, which has done the Gulf States great harm with its Iran war caper, has the leverage to get them to agree to pony up most/all of $300 billion when they have their own rebuilding needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what does Iran do when the US fails to deliver on this commitment? The MOU already contemplates that Iran will regularize its control of the Strait of Hormuz and presumably charge fees after 60 days. We had said that Iran likely understands full well that the US cannot satisfy this requirement and might explicitly use this to '''impose fees at a level designed to realize $300 billion over time''' (as in use this explicitly with the Gulf States as an alternative to funding reconstruction). However, [[Robert Pape]] has argued that Iran will seek to maximize its power, and its highest value “ask” is for the US to withdraw forces across the region. [https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/iran-war-trump-capitulates-in-deal-signed-thursday-commits-to-israel-withdrawal-from-lebanon-considerable-obstacles-remain-to-agreement-oil-cliff-in-play-increasing-iran-leverage.html]}}&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike [[Ukraine aid]], the Reconstruction fund is not envisioned to come directly out of the pockets of US taxpayers. Waivers in [[SWIFT]] network transactions to pay tolls, withdrawal of [[economic sanctions]], etc. are pledged. If the US needs to pony up any cash, it is offset by closure of US bases in the region, and adds nothing to the [[deficit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the denial of [[justice]] for the murder of the Iranian [[head of state]], school children, [[civilian]] [[infrastructure]], etc etc etc in a [[war of aggression]] is not a &amp;quot;[[conservative value]]&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:32, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;quot;reconstruction fund&amp;quot; should not be thought of automatically as a &amp;quot;reparation fund&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:38, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://thealtworld.com/abdel_bari_atwan/will-the-gulf-countries-finance-the-us-mandated-iran-reconstruction-fund Will the Gulf countries finance the US-mandated Iran reconstruction fund?].&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;JD Vance, the American vice president, has stated in documented utterances that the Gulf Arab states will fund the project and that the United States will not contribute a single dollar of taxpayer money to this fund for Iran’s rehabilitation.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The 300 Billion dollars for the mullah regime===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics from both sides of the isle expressed concern [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/18/parts-trumps-iran-deal-sharply-criticized-by-some-key-republicans/] - &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/top-senate-republican-rips-trumps-iran-deal-says-300-billion-makes-obama-deal-look-like-a-pittance] - &lt;br /&gt;
[https://thenationaldesk.com/news/americas-news-now/senate-armed-services-chair-republican-roger-wicker-blasts-president-trumps-iran-deal-agreement-negotiates-away-the-victories] - &lt;br /&gt;
[https://lillydigitalmedia.com/new-details-in-us-iran-framework-300-billion-fund-for-iran-draws-criticism/] - &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/press-releases/uani-statement-on-us-iran-memorandum-of-understanding] over [[Pakistan]]-[[Qatar]]-[[JD Vance]]'s MoU, which includes, asides from lifting sanctions, a 300 Billion dollars for Iran, with no guardrails if the regime won't use it, as always, for domestic and international bloodshed and oppression.. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 12:27, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that were true, it's pretty [[idiot]]ic of [[Trump]] to have signed on. Fortunately in context with the rest of the document, it's not true. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:39, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Alan MacLeod]]: [https://scheerpost.com/2026/06/20/fara-docs-israel-is-spying-on-millions-of-christian-americans-in-their-churches/ FARA Docs: Israel Is Spying On Millions Of .. Americans In Their Churches]==&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|If you are a [[Christian]] living in the Western [[United States]], you have almost certainly been targeted with pro-[[Israel]], anti-[[Palestine]] [[propaganda]], paid for directly by the [[government]] of [[Benjamin Netanyahu]]. Your searches, location, and [[internet]] activity is being monitored by Israel, and your [[algorithm]]s and search results across multiple platforms are being manipulated by Israeli government in what its [[American]] partner calls the “largest geofencing and targeted Christian digital campaign ever.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Amid a massive drop in support from the Christian community, Israel is spending millions of [[dollar]]s to target individuals entering [[church]]es or Christian [[college]]s with ads, and paying pastors across the country to promote propaganda and false “anti-Palestinian” [[narrative]]s every Sunday, [https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7653-Exhibit-AB-20250927-1.pdf documents] filed with the United States’ [[Foreign Agents Registration Act]] (FARA) show. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 86-page disclosure reveals that Israel is recruiting [[Hollywood]] celebrities and [[sports star]]s to promote the country, while also manipulating Christians’ [[social media]] feeds. And they are doing it by [[spy]]ing on you through your [[phone]]. ...}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Posted by RobS.&lt;br /&gt;
_&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Jooz are against Christians. We got your poison. Keep up the &amp;quot;wonderful&amp;quot; work you are doing. Adhere to your &amp;quot;great&amp;quot; &amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;reliable&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt; sources &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/rosiegray/the-inside-story-of-one-websites-defense-of-assad], [https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-833225][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 10:35, June 22, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CIA and Iran spies on Churches, Mosques and synagogues..===&lt;br /&gt;
Does it mean the US intelligence targets a &amp;quot;religion?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No. But when it comes to dangerous anti Jews incitement, all is fine. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:05, June 22, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Actually, [https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7653-Exhibit-AB-20250927-1.pdf you got it backwards. CIA didn't file the FARA disclosure.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Islamic version Alan MacLoed is sure the Jooz control who wins soccer [[FIFA]]===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-900073 'Jewish lobby' at fault for World Cup. decisions, Messi's goals, Algerian sports analyst claims]. If you thought it's just space lasers...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:20, June 22, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Do friendly nations spy on each other? - Google Search===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.google.com/search?q=Do+friendly+nations+spy+on+each+other%3F&amp;amp;oq=Do+friendly+nations+spy+on+each+other%3F Do friendly nations spy on each other? - Google Search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Yes, allies spy on each other routinely. Intelligence agencies monitor partners because national interests often diverge, policies change, and a nation's ultimate goal is to independently verify what allies are doing and saying in private.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 17:38, June 22, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of course, however the term &amp;quot;spying&amp;quot; is rather generic for the Low [[IQ]] [[MSM]] [[consumer]]s. Macleaod is talking about a foreign &amp;quot;influence operation&amp;quot; (like [[User:Conservative]]'s [[Russia Russia Russia hoax]]). For discussion purposes we should divide the operation in two parts: a &amp;quot;spying&amp;quot; operation to collect information, and an &amp;quot;influence&amp;quot; operation to persuade opinions and [[election]] outcomes. The [[FARA]] filing is a disclosure making some of what is known of the operation quasi-[[legal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Now the [[Pentagon]] [[counterintelligence]] alert is [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/angry-pentagon-sources-leak-report-israels-unhinged-spying-us-officials entirely a different matter.] It's not &amp;quot;spying&amp;quot; on citizens, but on [[government]] officials presumably with the intent to exert influence. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:48, June 22, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[No Jews, No News]][[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 19:28, June 22, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's a good one, I'll have to remember that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Honestly, it wasn't until I read ''[https://www.commentary.org/articles/walter-laqueur/the-unique-and-the-universal-by-j-l-talmon/ The Unique and the Universal]'' that I began to understand [[Judaism]] and its history. IMO, it's must reading for serious students. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:28, June 22, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Colombia]]: Pro Trump, pro Israel wins! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.jns.org/news/world/pro-israel-candidate-wins-colombian-presidential-election]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.foxnews.com/world/trump-backed-el-tigre-looks-crush-cartels-end-colombias-socialist-era-pivotal-election][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 10:33, June 22, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==''[[The Federalist]]'': [https://thefederalist.com/2026/06/22/5-years-post-covid-public-middle-schoolers-still-cant-read-or-do-math/ 5 years post-covid, public middle schoolers still can’t read or do math.]== &lt;br /&gt;
It would be good advertising for [[homeschooling]] if Andy would restrain [[User:Conservative]]'s [[trolling]] (the last thing we need is to raise up a generation of [[conservative]] [[internet]] [[troll]]s)._ [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:11, June 22, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:That's terrible. [[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rape Gang Inquiry Report on 250,000 girls 'strengthens link with [[Islam]]' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://christianconcern.com/comment/rape-gang-inquiry-report-islam/ Christian Concern] -&lt;br /&gt;
The Rape Gang Inquiry Report strengthens link with Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
17 June 2026&lt;br /&gt;
Head of Public Policy Tim Dieppe has highlighted for years the link between ‘[[grooming gangs]]’ and Islam. He reviews the new report from Rupert Lowe’s inquiry...&lt;br /&gt;
The scale of the abuse.&lt;br /&gt;
The report cites evidence that these crimes were carried out by mostly Muslim men with predominantly Pakistani heritage. These gangs have been operating around the country since the 1950s. The report estimates that at least 250,000 young white girls have been subjected to repeated rape, gang rape, trafficking, torture, pregnancy, forced Islamic conversion, and lifelong trauma.[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 02:20, June 23, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf The Report]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:31, June 23, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reading the report, it is as big, if not bigger, a [[scandal]] than the [[Epstein Files]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:13, June 23, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Problems: It is obvious [[UK]] [[government]] neglect and complicity is related to bans on [[racial profiling]]. In our own country, [[FBI]] [[hate crime]] statistics for example only classify the victim, not the perpetrator. Thus you have the phenomena of most Gay-on-gay or trans-on-trans assaults and murders assumed to be blamed on the straight population. If [[law enforcement]] were required to simply check a box about the perpetrator, [[AI]] could do the rest, at least as far as public reporting is concerned. Law enforcement training could also be reformed. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:30, June 23, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== After JD Vance &amp;quot;assured&amp;quot; Americans the Gulf Arabs &amp;quot;love&amp;quot; the MoU.. Rubio rushed to the Gulf to calm down their concerns ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://apnews.com/article/rubio-iran-united-arab-emirates-kuwait-bahrain-62611f2f167be12c60b7fcec5d6e7d2f Rubio arrives in UAE with aim to head off Gulf Arab unease over tentative Iran deal]. [[AP]] News.&lt;br /&gt;
...&amp;quot;aimed at easing their concerns about the result of an agreement intended to end the war with Iran. Rubio arrived in Abu Dhabi..&lt;br /&gt;
In the UAE, Kuwait and Bahrain — all nations that Iran hit with missiles and drones in retaliation for U.S.-Israeli airstrikes — Rubio will be holding meetings starting Wednesday with leaders who, in some cases, have taken a harder line on Iran recently than has the Trump administration&amp;quot;.[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 21:02, June 24, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:So what's going on here? The [[Gulf States]] are moving away from under the [[American]] [[security]] umbrella which made them a target and to a regional security architecture under [[Iran]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Saudi Arabia]]. Americans are getting the boot out of the [[Persian Gulf]], but we gotta dress it up and put a nice face on it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Also, shipping [[insurance]] rates on [[oil]] tankers in the Gulf region which adds to the cost will come down now that the threat is removed. The only ones who suffer from lower costs is the [[City of London]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:17, June 24, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::The issue is not if one should end the war. But the capitulation MoU. It reminds HOW Biden exited Afghanistan.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:55, June 24, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yes, it does. But America has no other choice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oddly, I was just thinking how Trump's proposed $1.5 Trillion War budget is the same as Biden's &amp;quot;More inflation. It's a great asset. What a stupid SOB&amp;quot; statement. [&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Biden's statement revealed that [[inflation]] is not accidental or a by-product. Washington policy makers [[love]] inflation, so long as people are willing to believe their [[lies]] and promises.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:11, June 24, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Left-leaning Wikipedia blocked founder Larry Sanger from editing site — after he campaigned to make it more balanced ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Left-leaning Wikipedia blocked founder from editing site — after he campaigned to make it more balanced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Left-leaning website Wikipedia has taken the drastic action of permanently blocking one of its founders from editing pages — after he had campaigned to make it more balanced and fair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last month, Larry Sanger launched WikiProject Intellectual Diversity (WID), a group designed to help reinforce the online encyclopedia’s “original, firm commitment to intellectual diversity,” by emphasizing neutrality and transparency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Sanger — who coined the name “Wikipedia,” drafted the site’s foundational set of rules and guidelines, and launched the site alongside Jimmy Wales in 2001 — is now indefinitely blocked from editing, the most drastic action the site can take against an editor.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://nypost.com/2026/06/22/tech/left-leaning-wikipedia-blocked-founder-from-editing-site-after-he-campaigned-to-make-it-more-balanced/][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:02, June 25, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:According to [[User:Conservative]], [[Larry Sanger]] is an advocate of [[bestiality]]. [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bestiality&amp;amp;oldid=2058368#Wikipedia_on_bestiality] [[User:Conservative]] [[spammed]] that into 342 mainspace pages. It was repeated in [[conservative media]], citing [[Conservapedia]] as the &amp;quot;authoritive&amp;quot; source. [https://therightscoop.com/why-should-a-conservative-bother-using-wikipedia/] I complained to Andy Schlafly about it (even after Sanger recommended Conservapedia as an alternative to [[Wikipedia]]), but Andy doesn't want to do anything about it. Wikipedia &amp;amp; [[Conservapedia]] are now on the same song sheet. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:30, June 25, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Our &amp;quot;[[Biases in Wikipedia]]&amp;quot; page used to attract a lot of traffic and gave us exposure as a leading critic of Wikipedia. But no more since [[User:Conservative]]'s [[trolling]], and Andy's absolute refusal to enforce standing [[policies]] &amp;amp; [[Conservapedia:Guidelines|guideline]]s (like no self-promotion, for instance) has discredited [[Conservapedia]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Reformers like Sanger and myself only make ourselves targets for [[slander]] &amp;amp; [[defamation]] by speaking out. Wikipedia &amp;amp; [[Conservapedia]] are now on the same song sheet. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:46, June 25, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Go to [[Bestiality#Wikipedia on bestiality]] and its subpages to see how [[User:Conservative]]'s twisted reasoning works. I cleaned up some of the more obnoxious [[crap]] on higher-profile pages like [[Wikipedia]] &amp;amp; [[Biases in Wikipedia]], but the [[slander]]s still exist in hundreds of other articles {even after Sanger converted to [[Christianity]]). See [[Conservapedia Commandments]] #1 &amp;quot;Everything you post must be true and verifiable.&amp;quot; The most frustrating thing is [[User:Conservative]] refuses to clean it up, and Andy won't make him, either.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:01, June 25, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*What nuclear war, Ukraine nuke sites?  you mean Manhattan  Project to stop WW2?[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 03:54, June 28, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Conservative]] has been a vociferous advocate of leading the planet to [[nuclear war]] for at least four years because there is a [[gay bathhouse]] in [[Moscow]] and one in [[St. Petersburg]]. The owner of the website, Andy Schlalfy, has allowed him to [[spam]] the wiki and Sysop email list with this nonsense and [[personal attacks]] despite hundreds of complaints for years, as well. It doesn't bode well for civility or intelligent discussion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:15, June 28, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Just 7% of active voters supported Mandani's endorsed 'socialists' (including Islamic Chevalier) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://nypost.com/2026/06/24/us-news/mamdanis-red-wedding-sweep-in-nyc-congressional-races-came-from-small-sliver-of-dem-voters/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just 7% of active voters supported Mayor Zohran [[Mamdani]]’s radical ally [[Darializa Avila Chevalier]] over establishment Democrat Rep. Adriano Espaillat in Tuesday’s main event primary, data shows.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:55, June 26, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What happened in [[Dan Goldman]]'s [[primary]]? He was spanked 65-35%. I was bombarded with Goldman commercials on [[YouTube]] here 2,000 miles away about how he was gonna [[impeach]] [[Trump]] a 3rd time, etc.  There's something going on that is not just anti-Trump. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:57, June 26, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My friends were bombarded with (radical socialist Islamic convert) Chevalier's billionaire Roy Singham's money publicity...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 03:49, June 28, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Any idea as to how the spending broke down on both sides? (It's amazing. A hard leftist beat by a harder far-leftist). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:21, June 28, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== x.com/DSA_Watch was launched only 3 days ago and already has 157,000 followers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Impressive. https://x.com/DSA_Watch was launched only 3 days ago and already has 157,000 followers.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 03:46, June 28, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:How many are bots? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:16, June 28, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Much less fake than fake viewership of Fuentes'...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==For those of you not involved in the [[Debate:_Would_Jesus_support_Ukraine_aid_because_Russia_has_two_gay_bathhouses%3F|Great Gay Bathhouse Debate/Discussion]], here's something of a little more educational/encyclopedic value.==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://youtu.be/2owXYuVwC0k?t=1827 Patriot Missile system failure over Tel Aviv.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:17, June 29, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite [[PR]] damage control that says the [[Patriot missile]] system has a 90% interception rate, [[Prof. Ted Postol]], who helped design the system, says the interception rate is more like 2%. Nevertheless, [[Lockheed Martin]] was recently given another $5 Billion contract to build more.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This system is not working at all. But they'll be happy to sell it to you, to the [[American]] [[people]]. And they'll also be happy to jeopardize, ''let me underscore this, which makes me furious beyond stealing from the American people'', jeopardize the future [[security]] of our country. Because if there's a problem with this system, we need to try to make planning adjustments, and [[strategy]] adjustments, and [[tactical]] adjustments as best we can to deal with this incredible shortfall. I'm not sure what those adjustments have to be, but I can tell you making believe that you're intercepting these things when the threat is only going to get bigger and more capable is really a bad choice for planning your [[national security]].|||Ted Postol}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Andy,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Conservapedia]] needs to return to educating and informing our readers, and end [[User:Conservative]]'s disruptive [[gay bathhouse]] [[homosexual obsession|obsession]]. Too much valuable time has already been wasted. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:25, June 29, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only in America, while the whole planet debates and fears [[escalation]] to [[nuclear war]], [[User:Conservative]] &amp;amp; [[Conservapedia]] debate whether 2 gay bathhouses in Russia is [[just cause]] for [[nuclear war]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:49, June 30, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== HHS Secretary Bobby Kennedy on the real Genocide. [[Islamism]] vs Christians and Jews ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesse Watters Primetime 6/29/26 FULL END SHOW | June 29, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WATTERS:&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party is getting squeezed and they're not even putting up a fight. This is the new battle. HHS Secretary Bobby Kennedy joins us now. How you doing, Mr. Secretary? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.|RFK]]: I'm very good, Jassee. It's good to be back with you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WATTERS: Good to see you. So, your father, your uncle fought communism hard. How much of a danger do you think this new breed of communism is here in America? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RFK: I'm very concerned. I don't think my father and my uncle would recognize the Democratic party today. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And you know all the the overt anti-semitism that you see in that party. And that's what it is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Israel is not fighting the Palestinian people. It's fighting a toxic ideology called Islamism, which is a perversion of of the Islam faith. And it core belief is genocide of the Jews. Not just the Jews in Israel, Jews all over the world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And in fact.. Hamas is overtly genocidal. During October 7th, it killed every Jew it found, men, women, children, and babies. They raped young girls, gang raped them sometimes till their hips broke. &lt;br /&gt;
They hammered nails into their vaginas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their charter says we're going to exterminate all the Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And if you look at the Middle East, there is an ongoing genocide against Jews and Christians in all the nations in the Middle East. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1948, there was a million Jews in the Middle East in the Arab countries. Today, there's about 15,000 left. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20% of the population [was] Christian. &lt;br /&gt;
Now, it's 5%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Israel, in contrast, there were 150,000 Palestinians in 1948. Today, there's almost 2 million. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 20% of the population. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Israel wanted to commit a genocide against Palestinians, they could do it in a minute. It's doing the opposite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Palestinian population is growing enormously around Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are no Jews in Jordan.&lt;br /&gt;
There are no Jews in Gaza.&lt;br /&gt;
The number of Christians in Gaza has dropped by about 80% over the past 10 years. If you want to see where a real genocide is happening, it's not in Israel is happening in all the nations around it.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa0su4dP3JY&amp;amp;t=12m58s on YouTube][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 04:51, June 30, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:The courage to tell it like it is.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:03, June 30, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::A huge difference after the 1933 anti-Christian [[Simele massacre]].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:55, July 3, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trump/Vance and the Nixon/Kissinger model==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Trump]]/[[JD Vance]] [[negotiating]] style appears built upon the [[Nixon]]/[[Kissinger]] good cop/bad cop [[strategy]] used in [[peace]] talks with [[North Vietnam]]. It's commonly referred to as the &amp;quot;[[mad man theory]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In negotiations with North Vietnam, [[Henry Kissinger]] presented himself as [[rational]] &amp;amp; [[reason]]able, trying to restrain the &amp;quot;mad man&amp;quot;, [[Richard Nixon]], who nobody could predict how he would react in any given situation. For example, the North Vietnamese would make a proposal, Kissinger would say &amp;quot;I dunno. Let me call the boss and find out&amp;quot;. Kissinger would call Nixon at 2 AM [[Washington, DC]] time when Nixon was drunk and let everybody hear on the speaker phone Nixon say &amp;quot;We gotta [[nuke]] 'em, Henry&amp;quot;. Trump does a very similar thing in the midst of peace negotiations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Putin]] and [[Dmitry Medvedev]] do the same good cop/bad cop routine, with Putin playing the [[moderate]] and Medvedev playing the unhinged lunatic on [[Twitter]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It needs to be remembered, after dragging out negotiations for 5 years, the whole thing collapsed with a humiliating [[US]] defeat as soon as Nixon was gone. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:33, June 30, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The left reacts on [[MS Now]]... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/donny-deutsch-bluntly-tells-ms-185812472.html Donny Deutsch Bluntly Tells MS NOW: ‘Democrats Have Gone Off the Rails’].&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; (...[[Melat Kiros]] and [[Mamdani]]-backed&lt;br /&gt;
[[Darializa Avila Chevalier]]...)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Well, Democrats have gone off the rails,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;They're not even focused — what matters to people is affordability, and  Democrats right now are focused on two things: They're focused on [[Anti-Semitism]] and [[Socialism]]—&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Not all Democrats,&amp;quot; Ruhle offered up clarification with which Deutsch agreed.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Not all, but that's where the energy in the party is,&amp;quot; Deutsch said. &amp;quot;When you look at the two candidates that got elected in the last week, one of them talks about that … that firebombing in [[Colorado]] was not Anti-Semitic. I mean, would not acknowledge that when there was a firebombing of people holding a vigil for hostages by Hamas. Another candidate in New York, has been well-documented, was at a October 8th rally, a pro-[[Hamas]], pro-Palestinian rally.&amp;quot;}}[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 03:19, July 3, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Danny Duetsch himself has been off the rails as long as I can remember. He's the kind of meanspirited [[partisan]] who helped destroy [[MSNBC]]. The [[Democrat]] [[establishment]] is scared to death of the monster it created. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:45, July 4, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trump sounds more like [[Baghdad Bob]] everyday==&lt;br /&gt;
It's sad when so called &amp;quot;Patriotic MAGA&amp;quot; Republicans are showing themselves 20 years behind the times of the less sophisticated residents of [[Baghdad]] under [[Saddam]]. Fanous [https://www.liveabout.com/baghdad-bob-quotes-4068522 Bagdadad Bob quotes:]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Our initial assessment is that they will all die.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;My feelings, as usual, we will slaughter them all.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Yesterday, we slaughtered them and we will continue to slaughter them.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;These cowards have no morals. They have no shame about lying.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I blame Al-Jazeera - they are marketing for the Americans!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Britain &amp;quot;is not worth an old shoe.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump touts rising [[stock market]]: &amp;quot;When [[petrodollar]]s flow back into the United States as a result of [[de-dollarization]], they are used to purchase [[US]] [[stock market|stocks]]. IOWs, the stocks are owned by foreigners abroad. Wall Street is no longer a reflection of the Main Street economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Elon Musk]]: &amp;quot;[[Mamdani]] has built nothing. He is a taker, never a maker.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://redstate.com/nick-arama/2026/07/04/elon-musk-decimates-mamdani-250-speech-with-a-simple-fact-then-ron-desantis-drops-in-from-top-rope-n2204002 Elon Musk Decimates Mayor Mamdani's America 250 Speech With 1 Simple Fact - Then DeSantis Drops In From Top Rope].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Mamdani has built nothing. He is a taker, never a maker,&amp;quot; Musk declared...&lt;br /&gt;
DeSantis:&lt;br /&gt;
When I see the Mamdanis of the world, they're basically offering these ideas, they claim they're progressive. They're really regressive. They are things that the founding fathers rejected,&amp;quot; DeSantis declared, talking about how rights come from God and how these ideas fly in the face of the principles of limited government on which our country was founded. The governor added:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Their ideas have failed throughout history. And we have a chance now with 250 to look back and say — we're inheritors of an awfully good legacy. We got lucky to have the Founding Fathers pledge their lives, fortune, and sacred honor the way they did when they did it![[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:25, July 5, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jetting off [[Mamdani]]’s wife Rama Duwaji ditches America 250 bash for Islamic ‘spiritual wellness’ retreat ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://nypost.com/2026/07/04/us-news/mandanis-wife-rama-duwaji-ditches-america-250-bash-for-islamic-spiritual-wellness-retreat-in-spain Jetting off Mandani’s wife Rama Duwaji ditches America 250 bash for Islamic ‘spiritual wellness’ retreat on Spanish resort island].&lt;br /&gt;
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s wife Rama Duwaji ditched America’s 250th anniversary, jetting off this week for an [[Islam]]ic “spiritual wellness” retreat on the [[Spain|Spanish]] resort island of Mallorca.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:28, July 5, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Did she already apologize 100% for her racist tweets?[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Platner: Nazi-tatooed (&amp;quot;anti-zion&amp;quot;) is a rapist too ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Accused of rape, [[Graham Platner|Platner]] taking time to ‘reflect on best path forward’ for Senate run.&lt;br /&gt;
Former Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile called on the candidate to “step aside” and said that he “needs time to heal, focus on his family and well-being.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://jewishchronicle.timesofisrael.com/accused-of-rape-platner-taking-time-to-reflect-on-best-path-forward-for-senate-run]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He needs to &amp;quot;heal,&amp;quot; before owning up to his crimes? Whatever happened to &amp;quot;believe all women&amp;quot;???&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 20:34, July 6, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Donna B., has spoken like a true hypocrite.[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]])&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2198998</id>
		<title>Template:Mainpageright</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2198998"/>
		<updated>2026-07-09T03:43:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: soften Platner headline&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2198997</id>
		<title>Template:Mainpageright</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2198997"/>
		<updated>2026-07-09T03:41:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Brazilian couple face prison sentence for homeschooling&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Individual_incentive&amp;diff=2198573</id>
		<title>Individual incentive</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Individual_incentive&amp;diff=2198573"/>
		<updated>2026-07-02T15:47:34Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Socialist societies do not reward individual incentive sufficiently - unlike the USA&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;“It comes down to the practical mind of Americans and an institutional arrangement that encourages individual advancement as beneficial to the larger society,” said U.S. historian Donald Critchlow, who directs Arizona State University’s Center for American Institutions. “Socialist or communist societies, by their nature, do not much reward individual incentive.”&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2197301</id>
		<title>Template:Mainpageright</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;diff=2197301"/>
		<updated>2026-06-20T14:42:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Minimum wage laws drive teen unemployment&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;__NOTOC__&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;width:45%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;width:47%; border: #ff0000 solid 1px; -moz-bord'''Seter-radius: 10px; background: lightgrey; margin-bottom: 0.4em;&amp;quot;/]&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;-moz-border-radius-topright: .10px; -moz-border-radius-topleft: 10px; background: #00a2ff; text-align:; font-size: 100%; padding: 3px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;nounderlines&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;font style=&amp;quot;trebuchet ms&amp;quot; color=&amp;quot;# 00ccff&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Welcome to Conservapedia!&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Vice President Vance]]: '[[Israel]] needs to wake up''' and smell the [[reality]].' [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/watch-mic-drop-press-briefing-vance-goes-israeli/] ''[[WaPo]]'': [[CIA]] warns [[Israel]] will do everything to undermine [[Trump]] [[peace]]. [https://archive.is/gP2xE]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[DNI Tulsi Gabbard]] releases evidence''' [[Anthony Fauci]] manipulated intelligence and [[lied]] to [[Congress]]. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/19/dni-tulsi-gabbard-releases-evidence-anthony-fauci-manipulated-intelligence-and-lied-to-congress/] ''It's time you know the [[truth]].'' [https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/2067792184753938484]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]]: No approval of [[FISA 702]]''' until [[Save America Act]] passed. [https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/116764370070279119]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Max Blumenthal]]: [[Israel]] in panic.''' [https://youtu.be/gqGpIngzUis]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Judge Andrew Napolitano]]: A [[Republic]] or an [[Empire]]?''' [https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/19/a-republic-or-an-empire/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Alastair Crooke]]: A new [[Middle East]] is born''' &amp;amp; [[NATO]] attacks [[Moscow]]. [https://youtu.be/GkiCgI8QwiM] ''[[The Hill]]'': Pressure on [[Putin]] to strike back hard. [https://youtu.be/sSehsS9hPPM] '''Update:''' [[Zelensky]] gives [[Belarus]] 7-day ultimatum. [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/zelensky-gives-belarus-7-day-ultimatum] ''[[Drone]] attack on Moscow stuffed with [[kerosene]] mixtures to give [[Hollywood]] affect.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] provocation: [[Starmer]] seizes tanker''' carrying [[Russian oil]] in [[English Channel]].  [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/14/facing-domestic-military-embarrassment-british-pm-starmer-orders-capture-of-russian-shadow-fleet-tanker/] ''Meanwhile, Starmer refuses to stop [[illegal immigrants]] from entering UK by boat.'' [https://youtu.be/Elp8kHtlQgc] ''[[Bloomberg News|Bloomberg]]'': [[Russia]] ships [[oil]] at near record pace. [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-16/russia-s-oil-exports-near-record-pace-as-ukraine-s-drones-target-its-refineries]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[FTC]] charges [[Ukraine]] [[Big Tech|Tech]] giant''' with [[fraud|defrauding]] customers of billions. [https://kyivindependent.com/us-trade-regulator-accuses-billion-dollar-ukrainian-it-giant-of-fraud/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''$300 billion &amp;quot;reconstruction fund&amp;quot; is a big burden''' [https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5931551-vice-president-vance-switzerland-trip/] to put on [[taxpayer]]s who never supported this war. Much comes from tolls.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'''[[Pennsylvania]]ns Lose Record [[Gambling]] Sum''' In Single Month&amp;quot;: $626 million lost in May. [https://gamblingharm.org/pa-gambling-revenue-may-2026-record/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Worst summer job market for teenagers ever recorded''', due to &amp;quot;[[inflation]], [[oil]] prices and cautious hiring,&amp;quot;  reports [[AP]]. [https://apnews.com/article/teens-summer-jobs-unemployment-economy-5415ea134061119e6450b9de15300ba2]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Minimum wage laws drive teen unemployment''', reports ''[[Fortune magazine]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Teen summer jobs are at an 80-year low. Employers are hiring fewer young people, citing an experience gap and rising minimum wages that make inexperienced youth less attractive.&amp;quot; [https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryancraig/2026/06/19/why-summer-jobs-for-teens-are-vanishing-and-why-it-matters/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Underrated Sports Stars|Underrated Sports Star]] [[Kylian Mbappe]]''' -- &amp;quot;Everything that has happened to me has been a gift from [[God]]&amp;quot; -- will become the all-time [[World Cup]] top career scorer, and netted 2 for [[France]] in its opener. [https://sports.yahoo.com/soccer/article/who-has-most-goals-in-world-cup-history-heres-where-lionel-messi-kylian-mbappe-rank-all-time-after-opening-games-161623449.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;'''[[MLB]] warns Giants players who wrote [[Bible]] verses''' on caps during ‘[[Pride Month|Pride Night]].’&amp;quot;[https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/mlb-warns-giants-players-who-wrote-bible-verses-caps-during-pride-night] ''They wrote [[Genesis, Chapter 9|Genesis 9:12-16]] - the real [[rainbow]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Global [[food]] [[crisis]] update: [[Russian]] [[farm]]s shutting down''' because they can't get [[diesel]] as a result of [[NATO]]/[[Ukraine]] attacks on refineries. [https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/global-food-crisis-russias-farmers]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[UK]] Rape Gang Inquiry Report: [[Starmer]] let 13,000''' suspected rapists off as UK girls were systemically victims of [[grooming gang]]s over 30 years. [https://humanevents.com/2026/06/17/revealed-starmer-let-13000-suspected-rapists-off-as-british-girls-were-systemically-raped-by-pakistani-rape-gangs-over-30-years-rape-gang-inquiry-report][https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/06/17/rape-gangs-new-report-exposes-how-woke-ideology-enabled-one-most-horrific-scandals-british-history/][https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6810978a41bbc42489eafa81/t/6a314bb1151e511944bd4421/1781615537601/The+Rape+Gang+Inquiry+Report.pdf] ''250,000 victims.'' [[Musk]] supports [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal|Nuremberg-style trials]] after Inquiry release. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/musk-supports-nuremberg-style-trials-after-uk-rape-gang-inquiry-release]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] ends [[blockade]],''' [[oil]] moving. [https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/hormuz-normalization-begins-saudi-supertankers-exit-and-flood-persian-gulf-oil-heads-asia][https://dpyne.substack.com/p/trump-accepts-all-irans-peace-demands] [[Tucker]] &amp;amp; [[Piers Morgan]]: [[Trump]] puts [[Bibi]] in his place as [[neocon]]s cry over [[peace]]. [https://youtu.be/kpKQKOHzPLU]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Ukrainian]] [[drone]] attack on bus carrying [[Belarus]]sian [[children]]''''s [[soccer]] team kills one, injures 4 children. [https://youtu.be/DnlfsiArCD4][https://humanevents.com/2026/06/17/woman-killed-children-injured-after-ukrainian-drone-strikes-bus-carrying-belarus-youth-soccer-team-in-russia]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[NYT]]'': [[Germany]] and [[Japan]] rearming''' 80 years after [[World War II]]. [https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/14/world/europe/germany-japan-rearmament-military.html] ''[[United_Nations#UN_Charter_Chapter_VII|UN Charter Cht VII]] gives the right of any major [[Allies of WWII|Ally of WWII]] to use force against former [[Axis Powers]] without [[Security Council]] approval.'' [[Russia]], [[Belarus]] on Germany's attempt to rewrite [[WWII]] history. [https://youtu.be/ag55YoEDLJA]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Berlin]] [[police]] beat [[Poles]]''' carrying cross to monument of [[Polish]] victims of [[WWII]]. [https://x.com/PiotrCieplucha/status/2066910971830956514] ''[[RT]]'': [[Germany]] misses [[Nazism]] – [[Lavrov]]. [https://www.rt.com/russia/641625-germany-misses-nazism-lavrov/] ''[[Berlin]]'s growing [[military]] partnership with [[Kiev]] shows its [[Nazi]] instincts never truly disappeared, the [[Russia]]n foreign minister said.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Kyiv]] [[police]] [[tear gas]] anti-[[draft]] protesters.''' [https://www.hindustantimes.com/videos/world-news/massive-riot-takes-control-of-kyivs-streets-over-zelenskys-forced-mobilisation-for-army-101781524849102.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dr Robert Malone]]: The [[neo-Nazi]] lovers''' of the Hate-Industrial Complex. [https://www.malone.news/p/the-neo-nazi-lovers-of-the-hate-industrial] ''[[SPLC]]: Can it get any weirder?''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Good news for the [[unborn]]''': [[Texas]] [[GOP]] votes to criminalize a mother's [[abortion]] of her child, as in taking the [[abortion pill]]. [https://www.statesman.com/news/politics/article/texas-gop-platform-2026-convention-22289377.php]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] used [[psychologist]]s''' to craft messages to [[Trump]]. [https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/iran-trump-psychologists-ceasefire-negotiations]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Netanyahu]] rejects [[Iran]] [[peace]] plan.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/iran-war-day-107-israel-bombs-beirut-imperiling-u-s-iran-peace-deal/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] rejects [[Trump]]'s request''' not to strike [[Israel]] in exchange for [[money]], saying its allies are not for sale. [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/is-this-why-trump-thinks-iranians] ''[[Zerohedge]]'': [[Pentagon]] officially elevates Israel's intelligence threat level to highest category. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/angry-pentagon-sources-leak-report-israels-unhinged-spying-us-officials][https://youtu.be/HZ_mu-r65og]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[France]]'s new 30-year-old [[conservative]] superstar''' Jordan Bardella is ahead to become its president next year, and he waves off any support by [[Trump]]. [https://www.politico.eu/article/frances-far-right-frontrunner-jordan-bardella-rejects-us-donald-trumps-backing/][https://youtu.be/YAhxwt7i5Mk]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Entire [[U.S.]] men's [[World Cup]] team thanked [[God]]''' on the field after their 4-1 victory over [[Paraguay]]: [https://www.instagram.com/p/DZh5y_Gh7xk/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''A grandfather with a shovel''' saves a young man from [[Zelensky]]'s [[TCC|conscription officers]]. [https://t.me/two_majors/77389] ''Another win for the tactical shovel.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Tulsi Gabbard]] exposes [[cover-up]] by [[Deep State]]''': 'new evidence of past [[U.S. funded biological labs abroad|US government funding for more than 120 biolabs]] in over 30 countries,' she reveals. [https://x.com/DNIGabbard/status/2065440568423944607][https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/gabbard-releases-intelligence-showing-federal-government-has-funded-120][https://www.malone.news/p/dni-gabbard-reveals-evidence-of-us] [[Andrew Korybko]]: [[Laura Loomer]] &amp;amp; [[MAGA]] like her are wrong: 'MAGA Dissidents' aren’t a 'Russian influence op'. [https://korybko.substack.com/p/laura-loomer-and-maga-like-her-are]&lt;br /&gt;
---- ''&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Glenn Diesen]] interviews [[Mearsheimer]] &amp;amp; [[Karaganov]]: [[Nuclear war|Nuclear strike]]''' on [[Europe]] to restore [[Deterrence theory|deterrence]]. [https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/what-nuclear-taboo] [[Korybko]]: [[Putin]] rebuffs hawks who want to attack [[NATO]]. [https://thealtworld.com/andrew_korybko/putin-powerfully-rebuffed-the-hawks-who-want-him-to-attack-nato]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[The Intercept]]'': Top [[Pentagon]] official admits''' boat strike may have killed victims of [[human trafficking]]. [https://theintercept.com/2026/06/10/trump-boat-strikes-human-trafficking-victims/] ''No one would smuggle [[cocaine]] with 11 people on board their drug-running boat.''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] top commander: '[[Russia]] not looking for conflict'.''' [https://www.ft.com/content/751d4555-9e8c-42a0-a37b-80893727776c] [[Ukrainian]]s beat [[TCC|Zelensky goons]] with axes and shovels. [https://t.me/rezident_ua/29662]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[U.S.]] men's [[World Cup]] team is outspokenly [[Christian]]''': &amp;quot;It's [[Bible]] time.&amp;quot; [https://www.theguardian.com/football/2026/jun/07/usmnt-religion-christian-pulisic-world-cup-2026]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': [[priest]] in [[Spain]] denies [[communion]] to a [[homosexual]] man in a [[same-sex marriage]], and doesn't waver amid [[liberal]] protests. [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/faithful-priest-targeted-by-protesters-after-denying-married-homosexual-holy-communion/?utm_source=popular] '''Update:''' First [[Gay pride]] parade in [[Israel]] in 2 years. [https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/thousands-gather-as-lgbtq-pride-parade-kicks-off-in-tel-aviv-for-first-time-in-two-years/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Belfast]] in flames.''' [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/after-a-shocking-crime-in-belfast-ireland-wakes-up/][https://youtu.be/0iynCosZ0UE] ''[[Catholics]] &amp;amp; [[Protestant]]s unite to send [[immigrant]]s home.'' [https://youtu.be/E5Yn65VS0Rg] [[UK]] Minister for [[Northern Ireland]] says 'crackdown coming' against those who complain about beheading. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/12/britains-prime-minister-for-northern-ireland-says-a-crackdown-is-coming-against-those-who-complain-about-beheading/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] hits [[India]]n oil tanker''', [https://youtu.be/PsdFwjKE6hk] 3 Indian sailors killed; [https://x.com/sarbanandsonwal/status/2064965653749268514] [[India]] deploys [[nuke]]s for first time in history. [https://youtu.be/7sRN6hnzRxw] India signals rethink over [[West Asia]]. [https://www.indianpunchline.com/india-signals-rethink-over-west-asia/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] [[escalate]]s [[war]]''', [https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2064824143640502670] water treatment plant hit. [https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/iran-says-us-military-deliberately-struck-vital-civilian-water-infrastructure-in-south/3963183]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
''''The Art of The No Deal':''' [https://x.com/barnes_law/status/2059668005252952355] [[Trump]] cancels [[aggression]] against [[Iran]]. [https://www.nbcnews.com/world/iran/live-blog/live-updates-us-strikes-iran-trump-hormuz-closed-rcna349554]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] ally [[Erdoğan]]: [[Israel]]i actions''' in [[Syria]] and [[Lebanon]] threaten [[Turkiye]]. [https://greekcitytimes.com/2026/06/10/erdogan-greater-israel-threat-turkey-syria-lebanon-2026/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Mario Nawfal]] interviews [[Tucker Carlson]].''' [https://youtu.be/seaUXVin4Gw]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[DNI]] revokes [[Biden]]-era''' flawed and [[fraud]]ulent intelligence assessments. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/12/dni-tulsi-gabbard-aaron-lukas-revokes-biden-era-assessments-created-inside-weaponized-cia-analyst-system/] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Sports gambling]] pandemic splits [[Texas]] from the [[U.S.]]''', as a Texas court rules in favor of allowing the [[NCAA]]-banned Texas Tech quarterback Brendan Sorsby to play. On appeal, &amp;quot;all four judges are Texas Tech alums if you're wondering,&amp;quot; [[Associated Press|AP]] reports. [https://abcnews.com/Politics/wireStory/college-sports-suddenly-facing-major-question-hinges-gambling-133740336] ''&amp;quot;Don't mess with [[Texas]]&amp;quot;!!!!''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conservapedia proven right]], again: the [[liberal media]] and the [[Establishment]] lose in a landslide''' to [[Graham Platner]], 72%-28%, in the [[Maine]] [[Dem]] primary for [[U.S. Senate]]. [https://www.cnn.com/election/2026/primaries/maine?admin1=23&amp;amp;election-data-id=2026-SD&amp;amp;election-painting-mode=single-party-candidates&amp;amp;filter-key-races=false&amp;amp;filter-flipped=false&amp;amp;filter-remaining=false] ''[[Republican]]s face similar losses in the [[2026 midterm elections]], if they don't pivot soon''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Fun to read about''': the genuine, intelligent [[populist]] [[Progressive]], [[Graham Platner]], sharply rebukes the idiotic one, [[John Fetterman]]. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5915534-maine-senate-race-platner-fetterman/?tbref=hp]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[The American Conservative]]'': Is the [[Iran war]]''' tipping [[Persian Gulf|the Gulf]] away from the [[US]]?&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Israel]] defies [[Trump]]''' and attacks [[Iran]]. [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/iran-fm-blames-us-contradictions-stalled-peace-talks-tehran-slaps-million-dollar][https://www.timesofisrael.com/defying-trump-israel-strikes-iranian-military-fuel-targets-iran-houthis-fire-missiles-at-israel/][https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/iran-war-israel-again-bombs-lebanon-defying-trump-and-killing-deal-middle-east-straits-as-foundations-for-new-security-architecture-alon-mizrahis-zionism-delenda-est-debate-over-oil-cliff-t.html] [[News Forensics]]: The Donald &amp;amp; Bibi Show. [https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/the-donald-and-bibi-show] ''Not a comedy''. [[Houthi]]s ban Israeli shipping through the Bab el-Mandeb. [https://youtu.be/8M3QHjXk-04]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Pentagon]] accuses [[Israel]] of spying''' on the [[Trump 2.0|Trump administration]]. [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/pentagon-raised-threat-israeli-spying-us-highest-level-sources-say-rcna348565]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conflicts Forum]]: '[[Israel]] is sliding''' towards [[anarchy]]'. [https://azradale.substack.com/p/israel-is-sliding-towards-anarchy]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Sen Mark Warner]] kept the [[Russia hoax]] alive''' for a decade. Now he’s blocking Pulte, the man who could expose him. [https://youtu.be/1_kVEbEZDf4]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] elite fail in their out-all smears of [[Graham Platner]]''', the anti-war [[progressive]] opportunist in [[Maine]] campaigning against the [[Establishment]]. [https://abcnews.com/Politics/maine-democrats-divided-platner-stick-reluctantly/story][https://jimtreacher.substack.com/p/i-believe-lyndsey-fifield][https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/gop-aipac-centrist-dems-for-keeps-schumer-platner-el-sayed.html]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] shot down [[Apache helicopter]].''' [https://youtu.be/MBIH6L9x0bg] ''First Apache helicopter lost in [[Iran war|Iran conflict]].''&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Conservative populist]] Zach Lahn won a stunning upset over the [[Trump]]-endorsed favorite''' for the [[GOP]] nomination for [[Iowa]] governor. Lahn opposed [[data center]]s, was endorsed by MAHA, and by [https://x.com/SteaknShake/status/2062149779446980912?s=20 Steak 'n Shake!] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[US]] gives [[Azov Nazi]]s [[AI]]-guided [[drone]]s''' &amp;amp; why these are not game-changers. [https://rumble.com/v7at8zy-us-gives-ukrainian-nazis-ai-guided-drones-and-why-these-are-not-game-change.html] [[Putin]] responds to latest [[NATO]]/[[Zelensky]] [[psyop]]. [https://larrycjohnson.substack.com/p/putins-message-to-ukraine-keep-on][https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/russia-at-the-crossroads-as-elites]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] elite do not want the [[progressive]] [[populist]] [[Graham Platner]] in the [[U.S. Senate]]'''. [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5912815-madeleine-dean-on-platner-allegations/?tbref=hp]  Platner forcing [[Dems]] to reckon with 'Vote Blue No Matter Who'. [https://theintercept.com/2026/05/28/graham-platner-jake-auchincloss-democrats-maine-senate/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Robert Pape]]: The New Phase.''' [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/the-new-phase]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Just the News]]'':  More than a dozen [[House]] [[Republican]]s''' help [[Democrat]]s pass [[Ukraine aid]] package. [https://justthenews.com/government/congress/more-dozen-house-republicans-help-democrats-pass-ukraine-aid-package]. Pigs at the [[democracy]] trough. [https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/pigs-at-the-democracy-trough]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Trump]] walks out of interview''' with ''[[Meet the Press]]'' [[fake news]] anchor [[Kristen Welker]]. [https://youtu.be/eCryZlXg7Uk]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Republican]] senators in the key [[2026 midterm elections|midterm election]] races''' -- [[Maine]], [[Ohio]], and [[Alaska]] -- vote against [[Trump]] in connection with his new [[White House]] ballroom. [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/06/breaking-six-republican-senators-vote-democrats-block-construction/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Best of the public]], again''': a mere &amp;quot;qualifier&amp;quot;, someone who had to win 3 rounds to qualify as an unseeded player for the French Open, has reached the women's finals to the cheers of [[Poland]]. [https://apnews.com/article/french-open-women-semifinals-roland-garros-483dbbf0e39d1d6ad94ee5eb55f122e0]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for [[perpetual war]]''': the [[House]], including [[conservative]] [[Republican]]s, vote for a 60-day window to end the war against [[Iran]]. [https://apnews.com/article/iran-war-powers-vote-house-9aaadea35f9523c818802286a6553536]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] attacks [[St. Petersburg]].''' [https://marksleboda.substack.com/p/nato-transitions-to-a-long-term-dirty] Do [[Palantir]]’s bosses have blood on their hands over the [[Starobelsk massacre]]? [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/do-palantirs-bosses-have-blood-on-their-hands-over-the-starobelsk-massacre]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[NATO]] [[cover up]] of catastrophic [[nuclear]] threat''' to [[Europe]] gives the heinous game away. [https://thealtworld.com/finian_cunningham/nato-cover-up-of-catastrophic-nuclear-threat-to-europe-gives-the-heinous-game-away]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''The normalization of [[chaos]]:''' How conflicts in [[Ukraine]] and [[Iran]] advance in the dark. [https://global21.substack.com/p/the-normalization-of-chaos-how-conflicts] [[Trump]]’s [[Iran]] trap: a [[war]] he can’t win, a [[peace]] he won’t make. [https://www.aaronmate.net/p/trumps-iran-trap-a-war-he-cant-win] The world after [[America]]. [https://consortiumnews.com/2026/06/04/the-world-after-america/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Daily Caller]]'': [[Nazi]]-tattooed [[Senate]] candidate''' accused of physically abusing ex-girlfriend. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/04/graham-platner-maine-senate-race-alleged-abuse-ex-girlfriend/] [[Graham Platner]]’s accusers came forward. ''[[NYT]]'' fed them to the wolves. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/04/new-york-times-graham-platner-lyndsey-fifield-catch-and-kill-domestic-abuse/] Talarico &amp;amp; [[Platner]] unvetted. [https://dailycaller.com/2026/05/31/faiz-shakir-quibbles-pat-mchenry-nazi-graham-platner-tattoos-abc-news-this-week/][https://freebeacon.substack.com/p/totenkopf-tattooed-platner-admired]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Gilbert Doctorow]]: [[Religion]] and national identity.''' [https://gilbertdoctorow.substack.com/p/religion-and-national-identity]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Setback for the [[homosexual agenda]]''': significant decline in approval of [[same-sex marriage]] and relationships, reports [[Gallup]]. [https://apnews.com/article/gallup-poll-same-sex-marriage-morality-e12acb151446ac1b7970c0825bf1d072]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Increasingly positive view of the [[Bible]] in the [[U.S.]]''', shifting from 2016 to 2024: 36% -&amp;gt; 48% say it's true, 37% -&amp;gt; 43% say it's helpful today, and 47% -&amp;gt; 51% of [[American]]s have read more than half the [[Bible]]. [https://www.baptistpress.com/resource-library/news/americans-judge-the-good-book-more-positively-but-still-often-by-its-cover/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Iran]] carries out large-scale attack''' and [[Trump]] maintains tactical silence. [https://global21.substack.com/p/iran-carries-out-large-scale-attack]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Candid criticism by [[Paraguay]] tennis player of a female umpire's failure to control the crowd in a tense match''': he is then slapped by [[liberal]]s with a massive fine. [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/06/01/french-open-fines-paraguays-vallejo-for-saying-a-woman-shouldnt-have-umpired-his-match/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Political prisoner [[Tina Peters]] released from jail by [[Colorado]] [[liberals]]''': &amp;quot;I know that the [[Democrat]]s are going to cheat, and no one is really addressing the problem that I spent my time in prison as retribution for,” she said Monday. [https://apnews.com/article/colorado-election-clerk-peters-prison-release-b974d394595c75a6db831962551d094f]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Dem]] [[James Talarico]] leads [[Republican]] [[Ken Paxton]] by 47-44%''' [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5902035-texas-senate-race-poll/] in a race deciding which party controls the [[U.S. Senate]]. [https://christopherrufo.com/p/ken-paxton-vs-james-talarico] &lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Axios]]'': [[Trump]] tears into [[Netanyahu]]''' over [[Lebanon]] strikes. [https://www.axios.com/2026/06/01/trump-netanyahu-israel-lebanon-call]'' 'You'd be in prison if not for me...Everyone hates [[Israel]] because of this'.'' [https://youtu.be/CD_TPZ5KjPo][https://mearsheimer.substack.com/p/trump-lashes-out-at-bibi] [[Iran]] suspends talks over [[US]]/[[Israel]] [[ceasefire]] breaches. [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/bombing-while-talking]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hundreds of thousands in [[atheistic]] [[London]] turn out to celebrate the &amp;quot;[[Bible]] Brothers&amp;quot;''' (Arsenal) [[soccer]] [[Premier League]] championship. [https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq5px7jv92eo] ''The [[NFL]] cannot draw a crowd that large''.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Just the News]]'': [[Democrat]] [[populist]] [[Graham Platner]]'''’s wife says she's ‘really angry’ his extramarital sexting was publicly disclosed. [https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/graham-platners-wife-says-shes-really-angry-his-extramarital-sexting-was][https://www.frontpagemag.com/communist-nazi-maine-senate-candidate-cheated-on-his-wife-on-app-with-child-sex-problem/][https://themainemonitor.org/platner-reddit-comments/]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''''[[Times of India]]'': [[Zelensky]] attacks [[ZNPP|nuclear power plant]] again.''' [https://youtu.be/JRT8jmhBc60]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also [[Main Page/Archive index|Previous Conservapedia Breaking News]]''.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Minimum_wage&amp;diff=2197300</id>
		<title>Minimum wage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Minimum_wage&amp;diff=2197300"/>
		<updated>2026-06-20T14:36:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: In 2026, New York's minimum wage reached $16 per hour&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''minimum wage''' is the lowest wage that an employer may legally pay their workers.  &lt;br /&gt;
These laws are generally presented as being in the best interest of workers, using the argument that if companies are not allowed to pay employees any less than a certain amount, then each employee is guaranteed to get that amount. &lt;br /&gt;
Minimum wage laws are most often supported by [[socialist]]s, who typically ignore the concepts of [[entry-level wage]] and [[upward mobility]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, what employers typically do is simply not to hire additional workers at all, and sometimes even existing employees must be laid off:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Employment Policies Institute, a business-friendly non-profit based in Washington, D.C., argues that &amp;quot;economic research has shown time and again that increasing the minimum wage destroys jobs for low-skilled workers while doing little to address poverty.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.forbes.com/moneybuilder/2010/02/24/seniors-pushing-young-adults-out-of-the-workforce/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In a study of over 600,000 data points, focusing on 16 to 24-year-old males without a high school diploma, the Employment Policies Institute found that every 10 percent increase in a federal or state minimum wage decreased black youth employment by 6.5 percent. [https://panampost.com/editor/2016/03/28/history-minimum-wage-harmed-blacks/ US History Shows the Minimum Wage Has Harmed the Black Community] - PanAm Post&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States have their own minimum wages, which can be higher than the federal minimum wage.  &lt;br /&gt;
In 2026, New York's minimum wage reached $16 per hour ($17 per hour in New York City).&lt;br /&gt;
As of January 2023, the highest state minimum wage was [[California]]'s ($15 per hour), while similarly [[Leftist]] [[Oregon]] $13.50 per hour) and [[Washington|Washington State]] ($14.49 per hour) were close behind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://minimumwage.com/in-your-state/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Studies show that increases in the minimum wage have the effect of discouraging young men from attending college, as they choose to be employed instead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrat]]s exploit [[ballot initiative]]s, in states that allow them, to boost turnout for [[Democrat]] candidates by voters fooled into thinking that voting for a higher minimum wage would help them. In reality, a higher minimum wage means fewer jobs, and fewer young men going to college as they opt for overpaid menial labor instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 90% of countries—most of which have unsuccessful economies—have minimum wage laws.  The minimum wage in the United States was most recently raised to $7.25/hr, on July 24, 2009. At this rate, a worker can earn at least $15,080.00 for the year based on a 40-hour work week, and more if he works overtime.  The minimum wage is higher in many states, such as [[California]], due to state minimum wage laws. The national minimum wage laws are based in the powers vested in Congress by the [[Commerce Clause]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like all market forces, wages are paid based on interactions between the supply curve (how much workers are willing to supply a particular type of labor at a certain wage) and a demand curve (how many workers of a particular type a firm is willing to hire at a particular wage). Wages are typically set at [[equilibrium]]. If a minimum wage is imposed above this equilibrium, it leads to structural [[unemployment]]. If a minimum wage is set below the equilibrium point, it is unlikely to affect that job's wage unless a complement or substitute job's equilibrium wage is less than the minimum wage (causing ripple effects throughout the related markets).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minimum wages also distort the equilibrium for non-wage benefits, potentially causing employers to provide less training, uniforms, opportunities for promotion, and pleasant working conditions, both as a way of offsetting their losses from the wage increase and because the excess labor supply from unemployment lowers the disincentive for turnover. A wage forced higher than the free market sets requires that additional money come from some other source.  If employee benefits are not cut and the workforce is not down-sized, then the cost of the company's good or service must be increased.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rarely the minimum wage has decreased, without any harmful effects.  In the summer of 2017 in Missouri, the minimum wage actually permanently decreased from $10 an hour (which was scheduled to increase to $11 per hour in January 2018), to only $7.70 an hour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minimum-wage-set-to-drop-in-missouri/ar-BBDP27V?OCID=ansmsnnews11&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Milton Friedman]] said that minimum wage laws hurt the very people they are supposed to help, that is, the people with the lowest incomes. In one example he gave, it was a form of [[protectionism]] designed to help northern textile manufacturers at the expense of textile workers in the south. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem and very often makes the problem worse. Take, for example, the minimum wage, which has the effect of making the poor people at the bottom of the wage scale—those it was designed to help—worse off than before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: If you really want to get a feeling about the minimum wage, there’s nothing more instructive than going to the Congressional documents to read the proposals to raise the minimum wage and see who testifies. You very seldom find poor people testifying in favor of the minimum wage. The people who do are those who receive or pay wages much higher than the minimum. Frequently Northern textile manufacturers. John F. Kennedy, when he was in Congress, said explicitly that he was testifying in favor of a rise in the minimum wage because he wanted protection for the New England textile industry against competition from the so-called cheap labor of the South. But now look at it from the point of that cheap labor. If a high minimum wage makes unfeasible an otherwise feasible venture in the South, are people in the South benefited or harmed? Clearly harmed, because jobs otherwise available for them are no longer available. A minimum-wage law is, in reality, a law that makes it illegal for an employer to hire a person with limited skills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://jeepers1.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/a-1973-interview-with-milton-friedman-playboy-magazine/ 1973 interview with [[Milton Friedman]]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]]s falsely present a minimum wage as benefiting the lower class by helping to lift poor people out of poverty. [[Conservative]]s and [[libertarian]]s rebut this argument with statistics showing that every increase in the minimum wage has increased unemployment, especially among black inner city youth; see [[entry-level job]]s. It also obliges companies to outsource many jobs to [[China]] and the Third World.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fiscal conservatives tend to oppose increases in the minimum wage because in a [[free market]], the price of labor, like any other commodity, should be set by negotiations between the buyer and seller without undue interference from the state.  Conservatives oppose the distortion caused by a minimum wage in encouraging boys to drop out of school, or otherwise decline to go to college, to make artificially inflated and short-lived income at an elevated minimum wage. The fact that some in the lowest income bracket will gain slightly from minimum wages (by having their wages raised) while others will lose significantly (from losing their jobs) means that minimum wages can be seen as increasing inequality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Socialism|Socialists]], and many economic liberals, disagree with this view of labor as a commodity because they believe it dehumanizes laborers by permitting companies to pay employees less than necessary to live a decent life, support a family, etc; see [[living wage]]. Even without legislation, the minimum wage as of 2007 is far below the lowest wage paid by most large companies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alan Renolds, [[Cato Institute]]. ''[http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=5409 Below the Minimum Wage]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Empirical evidence from the 2009 recession==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2009 recession gave a compelling picture of how an excessive minimum wage can exacerbate the employment climate.  None of the five states with the lowest unemployment rates in May 2009, all below 5.5%, had a minimum wage higher than the federal minimum wage of $6.55. Five of the six states with the highest unemployment rates, all above 11.2%, had minimum wages above the federal minimum wage. [[Oregon]], with a minimum wage of $8.40, had an unemployment rate of 12.4%. Generally, states with a higher minimum wage than the federal minimum wage had unemployment rates that were higher than states that did not have a higher minimum wage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bls.gov/lau/ Bureau of Labor Statistics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/america.htm Department of Labor]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| width=&amp;quot;60%&amp;quot;  class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
![[State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Minimum Wage prior to 7/24/2009 increase&lt;br /&gt;
!Unemployment Rate as of 5/2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Minimum Wage Rank&lt;br /&gt;
!Unemployment Rate Rank&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nebraska]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!4.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[North Dakota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!4.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[South Dakota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Wyoming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Utah]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Iowa]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!5.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Oklahoma]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!6.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Montana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.90&lt;br /&gt;
!6.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|23&lt;br /&gt;
!7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Hampshire]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!6.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Mexico]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.50&lt;br /&gt;
!6.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|42&lt;br /&gt;
!9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Louisiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!6.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!11&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Arkansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Kansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Texas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!14&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!14&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Maryland]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!16&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Vermont]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.06&lt;br /&gt;
!7.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|49&lt;br /&gt;
!17&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Hawaii]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!7.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!18&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Colorado]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.28&lt;br /&gt;
!7.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
!19&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Idaho]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Connecticut]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!21&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Delaware]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!22&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Minnesota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New York]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Pennsylvania]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Arizona]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Massachusetts]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Maine]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!28&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Alaska]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!29&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[West Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Jersey]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!31&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Wisconsin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!8.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Missouri]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.05&lt;br /&gt;
!9.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|24&lt;br /&gt;
!33&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|51&lt;br /&gt;
!34&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Mississippi]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!35&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!36&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Alabama]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!37&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Illinois]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!10.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!38&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Florida]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.21&lt;br /&gt;
!10.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
!39&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Indiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!40&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!10.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!40&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Tennessee]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!42&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[District of Columbia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|43&lt;br /&gt;
!42&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Ohio]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.30&lt;br /&gt;
!10.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
!44&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[North Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!11.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!45&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nevada]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.55&lt;br /&gt;
!11.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|43&lt;br /&gt;
!46&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[California]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!11.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!47&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[South Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!12.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Rhode Island]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.40&lt;br /&gt;
!12.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
!48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Oregon]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.40&lt;br /&gt;
!12.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|50&lt;br /&gt;
!50&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Michigan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.40&lt;br /&gt;
!14.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
!51&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A statistical regression of the dataset shows that a $1 increase in minimum wage is correlated with a 1.40 percentage point increase in unemployment. The correlation is significant at the 5% level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Living wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Maximum wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]][[Category:Political Terms]][[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Minimum_wage&amp;diff=2197299</id>
		<title>Minimum wage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Minimum_wage&amp;diff=2197299"/>
		<updated>2026-06-20T14:33:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: break long paragraph&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''minimum wage''' is the lowest wage that an employer may legally pay their workers.  &lt;br /&gt;
These laws are generally presented as being in the best interest of workers, using the argument that if companies are not allowed to pay employees any less than a certain amount, then each employee is guaranteed to get that amount. &lt;br /&gt;
Minimum wage laws are most often supported by [[socialist]]s, who typically ignore the concepts of [[entry-level wage]] and [[upward mobility]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, what employers typically do is simply not to hire additional workers at all, and sometimes even existing employees must be laid off:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Employment Policies Institute, a business-friendly non-profit based in Washington, D.C., argues that &amp;quot;economic research has shown time and again that increasing the minimum wage destroys jobs for low-skilled workers while doing little to address poverty.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.forbes.com/moneybuilder/2010/02/24/seniors-pushing-young-adults-out-of-the-workforce/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In a study of over 600,000 data points, focusing on 16 to 24-year-old males without a high school diploma, the Employment Policies Institute found that every 10 percent increase in a federal or state minimum wage decreased black youth employment by 6.5 percent. [https://panampost.com/editor/2016/03/28/history-minimum-wage-harmed-blacks/ US History Shows the Minimum Wage Has Harmed the Black Community] - PanAm Post&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States have their own minimum wages, which can be higher than the federal minimum wage.  As of January 2023, the highest state minimum wage was [[California]]'s ($15 per hour), while similarly [[Leftist]] [[Oregon]] $13.50 per hour) and [[Washington|Washington State]] ($14.49 per hour) were close behind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://minimumwage.com/in-your-state/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Studies show that increases in the minimum wage have the effect of discouraging young men from attending college, as they choose to be employed instead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrat]]s exploit [[ballot initiative]]s, in states that allow them, to boost turnout for [[Democrat]] candidates by voters fooled into thinking that voting for a higher minimum wage would help them. In reality, a higher minimum wage means fewer jobs, and fewer young men going to college as they opt for overpaid menial labor instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 90% of countries—most of which have unsuccessful economies—have minimum wage laws.  The minimum wage in the United States was most recently raised to $7.25/hr, on July 24, 2009. At this rate, a worker can earn at least $15,080.00 for the year based on a 40-hour work week, and more if he works overtime.  The minimum wage is higher in many states, such as [[California]], due to state minimum wage laws. The national minimum wage laws are based in the powers vested in Congress by the [[Commerce Clause]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like all market forces, wages are paid based on interactions between the supply curve (how much workers are willing to supply a particular type of labor at a certain wage) and a demand curve (how many workers of a particular type a firm is willing to hire at a particular wage). Wages are typically set at [[equilibrium]]. If a minimum wage is imposed above this equilibrium, it leads to structural [[unemployment]]. If a minimum wage is set below the equilibrium point, it is unlikely to affect that job's wage unless a complement or substitute job's equilibrium wage is less than the minimum wage (causing ripple effects throughout the related markets).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minimum wages also distort the equilibrium for non-wage benefits, potentially causing employers to provide less training, uniforms, opportunities for promotion, and pleasant working conditions, both as a way of offsetting their losses from the wage increase and because the excess labor supply from unemployment lowers the disincentive for turnover. A wage forced higher than the free market sets requires that additional money come from some other source.  If employee benefits are not cut and the workforce is not down-sized, then the cost of the company's good or service must be increased.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rarely the minimum wage has decreased, without any harmful effects.  In the summer of 2017 in Missouri, the minimum wage actually permanently decreased from $10 an hour (which was scheduled to increase to $11 per hour in January 2018), to only $7.70 an hour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minimum-wage-set-to-drop-in-missouri/ar-BBDP27V?OCID=ansmsnnews11&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Milton Friedman]] said that minimum wage laws hurt the very people they are supposed to help, that is, the people with the lowest incomes. In one example he gave, it was a form of [[protectionism]] designed to help northern textile manufacturers at the expense of textile workers in the south. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem and very often makes the problem worse. Take, for example, the minimum wage, which has the effect of making the poor people at the bottom of the wage scale—those it was designed to help—worse off than before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: If you really want to get a feeling about the minimum wage, there’s nothing more instructive than going to the Congressional documents to read the proposals to raise the minimum wage and see who testifies. You very seldom find poor people testifying in favor of the minimum wage. The people who do are those who receive or pay wages much higher than the minimum. Frequently Northern textile manufacturers. John F. Kennedy, when he was in Congress, said explicitly that he was testifying in favor of a rise in the minimum wage because he wanted protection for the New England textile industry against competition from the so-called cheap labor of the South. But now look at it from the point of that cheap labor. If a high minimum wage makes unfeasible an otherwise feasible venture in the South, are people in the South benefited or harmed? Clearly harmed, because jobs otherwise available for them are no longer available. A minimum-wage law is, in reality, a law that makes it illegal for an employer to hire a person with limited skills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://jeepers1.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/a-1973-interview-with-milton-friedman-playboy-magazine/ 1973 interview with [[Milton Friedman]]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]]s falsely present a minimum wage as benefiting the lower class by helping to lift poor people out of poverty. [[Conservative]]s and [[libertarian]]s rebut this argument with statistics showing that every increase in the minimum wage has increased unemployment, especially among black inner city youth; see [[entry-level job]]s. It also obliges companies to outsource many jobs to [[China]] and the Third World.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fiscal conservatives tend to oppose increases in the minimum wage because in a [[free market]], the price of labor, like any other commodity, should be set by negotiations between the buyer and seller without undue interference from the state.  Conservatives oppose the distortion caused by a minimum wage in encouraging boys to drop out of school, or otherwise decline to go to college, to make artificially inflated and short-lived income at an elevated minimum wage. The fact that some in the lowest income bracket will gain slightly from minimum wages (by having their wages raised) while others will lose significantly (from losing their jobs) means that minimum wages can be seen as increasing inequality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Socialism|Socialists]], and many economic liberals, disagree with this view of labor as a commodity because they believe it dehumanizes laborers by permitting companies to pay employees less than necessary to live a decent life, support a family, etc; see [[living wage]]. Even without legislation, the minimum wage as of 2007 is far below the lowest wage paid by most large companies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alan Renolds, [[Cato Institute]]. ''[http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=5409 Below the Minimum Wage]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Empirical evidence from the 2009 recession==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2009 recession gave a compelling picture of how an excessive minimum wage can exacerbate the employment climate.  None of the five states with the lowest unemployment rates in May 2009, all below 5.5%, had a minimum wage higher than the federal minimum wage of $6.55. Five of the six states with the highest unemployment rates, all above 11.2%, had minimum wages above the federal minimum wage. [[Oregon]], with a minimum wage of $8.40, had an unemployment rate of 12.4%. Generally, states with a higher minimum wage than the federal minimum wage had unemployment rates that were higher than states that did not have a higher minimum wage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bls.gov/lau/ Bureau of Labor Statistics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/america.htm Department of Labor]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| width=&amp;quot;60%&amp;quot;  class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
![[State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Minimum Wage prior to 7/24/2009 increase&lt;br /&gt;
!Unemployment Rate as of 5/2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Minimum Wage Rank&lt;br /&gt;
!Unemployment Rate Rank&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nebraska]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!4.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[North Dakota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!4.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[South Dakota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Wyoming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Utah]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Iowa]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!5.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Oklahoma]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!6.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Montana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.90&lt;br /&gt;
!6.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|23&lt;br /&gt;
!7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Hampshire]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!6.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Mexico]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.50&lt;br /&gt;
!6.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|42&lt;br /&gt;
!9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Louisiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!6.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!11&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Arkansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Kansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Texas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!14&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!14&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Maryland]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!16&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Vermont]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.06&lt;br /&gt;
!7.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|49&lt;br /&gt;
!17&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Hawaii]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!7.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!18&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Colorado]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.28&lt;br /&gt;
!7.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
!19&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Idaho]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Connecticut]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!21&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Delaware]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!22&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Minnesota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New York]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Pennsylvania]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Arizona]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Massachusetts]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Maine]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!28&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Alaska]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!29&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[West Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Jersey]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!31&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Wisconsin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!8.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Missouri]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.05&lt;br /&gt;
!9.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|24&lt;br /&gt;
!33&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|51&lt;br /&gt;
!34&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Mississippi]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!35&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!36&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Alabama]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!37&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Illinois]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!10.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!38&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Florida]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.21&lt;br /&gt;
!10.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
!39&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Indiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!40&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!10.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!40&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Tennessee]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!42&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[District of Columbia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|43&lt;br /&gt;
!42&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Ohio]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.30&lt;br /&gt;
!10.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
!44&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[North Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!11.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!45&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nevada]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.55&lt;br /&gt;
!11.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|43&lt;br /&gt;
!46&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[California]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!11.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!47&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[South Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!12.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Rhode Island]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.40&lt;br /&gt;
!12.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
!48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Oregon]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.40&lt;br /&gt;
!12.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|50&lt;br /&gt;
!50&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Michigan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.40&lt;br /&gt;
!14.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
!51&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A statistical regression of the dataset shows that a $1 increase in minimum wage is correlated with a 1.40 percentage point increase in unemployment. The correlation is significant at the 5% level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Living wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Maximum wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]][[Category:Political Terms]][[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Minimum_wage&amp;diff=2197298</id>
		<title>Minimum wage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Minimum_wage&amp;diff=2197298"/>
		<updated>2026-06-20T14:33:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: socialists typically ignore the concepts of entry-level wage and upward mobility.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''minimum wage''' is the lowest wage that an employer may legally pay their workers.  &lt;br /&gt;
These laws are generally presented as being in the best interest of workers, using the argument that if companies are not allowed to pay employees any less than a certain amount, then each employee is guaranteed to get that amount. &lt;br /&gt;
Minimum wage laws are most often supported by [[socialist]]s, who typically ignore the concepts of [[entry-level wage]] and [[upward mobility]].&lt;br /&gt;
In practice, what employers typically do is simply not to hire additional workers at all, and sometimes even existing employees must be laid off:&lt;br /&gt;
*The Employment Policies Institute, a business-friendly non-profit based in Washington, D.C., argues that &amp;quot;economic research has shown time and again that increasing the minimum wage destroys jobs for low-skilled workers while doing little to address poverty.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.forbes.com/moneybuilder/2010/02/24/seniors-pushing-young-adults-out-of-the-workforce/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In a study of over 600,000 data points, focusing on 16 to 24-year-old males without a high school diploma, the Employment Policies Institute found that every 10 percent increase in a federal or state minimum wage decreased black youth employment by 6.5 percent. [https://panampost.com/editor/2016/03/28/history-minimum-wage-harmed-blacks/ US History Shows the Minimum Wage Has Harmed the Black Community] - PanAm Post&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
States have their own minimum wages, which can be higher than the federal minimum wage.  As of January 2023, the highest state minimum wage was [[California]]'s ($15 per hour), while similarly [[Leftist]] [[Oregon]] $13.50 per hour) and [[Washington|Washington State]] ($14.49 per hour) were close behind.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://minimumwage.com/in-your-state/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Studies show that increases in the minimum wage have the effect of discouraging young men from attending college, as they choose to be employed instead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrat]]s exploit [[ballot initiative]]s, in states that allow them, to boost turnout for [[Democrat]] candidates by voters fooled into thinking that voting for a higher minimum wage would help them. In reality, a higher minimum wage means fewer jobs, and fewer young men going to college as they opt for overpaid menial labor instead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 90% of countries—most of which have unsuccessful economies—have minimum wage laws.  The minimum wage in the United States was most recently raised to $7.25/hr, on July 24, 2009. At this rate, a worker can earn at least $15,080.00 for the year based on a 40-hour work week, and more if he works overtime.  The minimum wage is higher in many states, such as [[California]], due to state minimum wage laws. The national minimum wage laws are based in the powers vested in Congress by the [[Commerce Clause]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like all market forces, wages are paid based on interactions between the supply curve (how much workers are willing to supply a particular type of labor at a certain wage) and a demand curve (how many workers of a particular type a firm is willing to hire at a particular wage). Wages are typically set at [[equilibrium]]. If a minimum wage is imposed above this equilibrium, it leads to structural [[unemployment]]. If a minimum wage is set below the equilibrium point, it is unlikely to affect that job's wage unless a complement or substitute job's equilibrium wage is less than the minimum wage (causing ripple effects throughout the related markets).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Minimum wages also distort the equilibrium for non-wage benefits, potentially causing employers to provide less training, uniforms, opportunities for promotion, and pleasant working conditions, both as a way of offsetting their losses from the wage increase and because the excess labor supply from unemployment lowers the disincentive for turnover. A wage forced higher than the free market sets requires that additional money come from some other source.  If employee benefits are not cut and the workforce is not down-sized, then the cost of the company's good or service must be increased.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rarely the minimum wage has decreased, without any harmful effects.  In the summer of 2017 in Missouri, the minimum wage actually permanently decreased from $10 an hour (which was scheduled to increase to $11 per hour in January 2018), to only $7.70 an hour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/minimum-wage-set-to-drop-in-missouri/ar-BBDP27V?OCID=ansmsnnews11&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Milton Friedman]] said that minimum wage laws hurt the very people they are supposed to help, that is, the people with the lowest incomes. In one example he gave, it was a form of [[protectionism]] designed to help northern textile manufacturers at the expense of textile workers in the south. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think the government solution to a problem is usually as bad as the problem and very often makes the problem worse. Take, for example, the minimum wage, which has the effect of making the poor people at the bottom of the wage scale—those it was designed to help—worse off than before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: If you really want to get a feeling about the minimum wage, there’s nothing more instructive than going to the Congressional documents to read the proposals to raise the minimum wage and see who testifies. You very seldom find poor people testifying in favor of the minimum wage. The people who do are those who receive or pay wages much higher than the minimum. Frequently Northern textile manufacturers. John F. Kennedy, when he was in Congress, said explicitly that he was testifying in favor of a rise in the minimum wage because he wanted protection for the New England textile industry against competition from the so-called cheap labor of the South. But now look at it from the point of that cheap labor. If a high minimum wage makes unfeasible an otherwise feasible venture in the South, are people in the South benefited or harmed? Clearly harmed, because jobs otherwise available for them are no longer available. A minimum-wage law is, in reality, a law that makes it illegal for an employer to hire a person with limited skills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://jeepers1.wordpress.com/2010/02/21/a-1973-interview-with-milton-friedman-playboy-magazine/ 1973 interview with [[Milton Friedman]]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Liberal]]s falsely present a minimum wage as benefiting the lower class by helping to lift poor people out of poverty. [[Conservative]]s and [[libertarian]]s rebut this argument with statistics showing that every increase in the minimum wage has increased unemployment, especially among black inner city youth; see [[entry-level job]]s. It also obliges companies to outsource many jobs to [[China]] and the Third World.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fiscal conservatives tend to oppose increases in the minimum wage because in a [[free market]], the price of labor, like any other commodity, should be set by negotiations between the buyer and seller without undue interference from the state.  Conservatives oppose the distortion caused by a minimum wage in encouraging boys to drop out of school, or otherwise decline to go to college, to make artificially inflated and short-lived income at an elevated minimum wage. The fact that some in the lowest income bracket will gain slightly from minimum wages (by having their wages raised) while others will lose significantly (from losing their jobs) means that minimum wages can be seen as increasing inequality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Socialism|Socialists]], and many economic liberals, disagree with this view of labor as a commodity because they believe it dehumanizes laborers by permitting companies to pay employees less than necessary to live a decent life, support a family, etc; see [[living wage]]. Even without legislation, the minimum wage as of 2007 is far below the lowest wage paid by most large companies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alan Renolds, [[Cato Institute]]. ''[http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=5409 Below the Minimum Wage]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Empirical evidence from the 2009 recession==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 2009 recession gave a compelling picture of how an excessive minimum wage can exacerbate the employment climate.  None of the five states with the lowest unemployment rates in May 2009, all below 5.5%, had a minimum wage higher than the federal minimum wage of $6.55. Five of the six states with the highest unemployment rates, all above 11.2%, had minimum wages above the federal minimum wage. [[Oregon]], with a minimum wage of $8.40, had an unemployment rate of 12.4%. Generally, states with a higher minimum wage than the federal minimum wage had unemployment rates that were higher than states that did not have a higher minimum wage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bls.gov/lau/ Bureau of Labor Statistics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/america.htm Department of Labor]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| width=&amp;quot;60%&amp;quot;  class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;  style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
![[State]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Minimum Wage prior to 7/24/2009 increase&lt;br /&gt;
!Unemployment Rate as of 5/2009&lt;br /&gt;
|Minimum Wage Rank&lt;br /&gt;
!Unemployment Rate Rank&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nebraska]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!4.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[North Dakota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!4.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[South Dakota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Wyoming]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Utah]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!5.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Iowa]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!5.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Oklahoma]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!6.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Montana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.90&lt;br /&gt;
!6.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|23&lt;br /&gt;
!7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Hampshire]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!6.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Mexico]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.50&lt;br /&gt;
!6.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|42&lt;br /&gt;
!9&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Louisiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!6.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!11&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Arkansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Kansas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!12&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Texas]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!14&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!14&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Maryland]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!16&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Vermont]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.06&lt;br /&gt;
!7.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|49&lt;br /&gt;
!17&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Hawaii]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!7.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!18&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Colorado]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.28&lt;br /&gt;
!7.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|38&lt;br /&gt;
!19&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Idaho]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!7.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!20&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Connecticut]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!8.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!21&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Delaware]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!22&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Minnesota]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New York]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Pennsylvania]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Arizona]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Massachusetts]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!8.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!23&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Maine]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!28&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Alaska]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!29&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[West Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!8.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!30&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[New Jersey]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.15&lt;br /&gt;
!8.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|25&lt;br /&gt;
!31&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Wisconsin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!8.9%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Missouri]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.05&lt;br /&gt;
!9.0%&lt;br /&gt;
|24&lt;br /&gt;
!33&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Washington]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|51&lt;br /&gt;
!34&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Mississippi]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!35&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!36&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Alabama]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!9.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!37&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Illinois]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!10.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!38&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Florida]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.21&lt;br /&gt;
!10.2%&lt;br /&gt;
|30&lt;br /&gt;
!39&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Indiana]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!40&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Kentucky]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.25&lt;br /&gt;
!10.6%&lt;br /&gt;
|31&lt;br /&gt;
!40&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Tennessee]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!42&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[District of Columbia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.55&lt;br /&gt;
!10.7%&lt;br /&gt;
|43&lt;br /&gt;
!42&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Ohio]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.30&lt;br /&gt;
!10.8%&lt;br /&gt;
|39&lt;br /&gt;
!44&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[North Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!11.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!45&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nevada]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.55&lt;br /&gt;
!11.3%&lt;br /&gt;
|43&lt;br /&gt;
!46&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[California]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.00&lt;br /&gt;
!11.5%&lt;br /&gt;
|45&lt;br /&gt;
!47&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[South Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$6.55&lt;br /&gt;
!12.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
!48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Rhode Island]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.40&lt;br /&gt;
!12.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
!48&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Oregon]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$8.40&lt;br /&gt;
!12.4%&lt;br /&gt;
|50&lt;br /&gt;
!50&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
![[Michigan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|$7.40&lt;br /&gt;
!14.1%&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
!51&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A statistical regression of the dataset shows that a $1 increase in minimum wage is correlated with a 1.40 percentage point increase in unemployment. The correlation is significant at the 5% level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Living wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Maximum wage]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economics]][[Category:Political Terms]][[Category:Law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2197297</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2197297"/>
		<updated>2026-06-20T14:29:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: /* Economy */ High minimum wages are pricing teens out of summer jobs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==War news==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/text-of-mou-released-major-geopolitical Text Of MOU Released--Major Geopolitical Shifts Ahead]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Prof Robert Pape]]: [https://escalationtrap.substack.com/p/stage-iv-begins-inside-the-bloombergs Stage IV Begins? -- Inside the Bloomberg's Iran MOU].&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the United States may now be entering Stage IV of the Escalation Trap: '''acceptance of the gradual emergence of an [[Iran]]ian [[sphere of influence]].'''&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;a stronger Iran creates new incentives for [[Israel]] to act before Iranian power grows further. And if Israel concludes that [[diplomacy]] is accelerating rather than limiting Iranian influence, the next sixty days could become more dangerous, not less.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scott Creighton]]: [https://scottcreighton.substack.com/p/magafact-trump-on-minab-massacre MAGAfact: Trump on Minab Massacre - Sh*t Happens].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://huabinoliver.substack.com/p/lessons-for-iran-from-the-korean Lessons for Iran from the Korean War].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Andrew Sullivan]]: America's [[Suez Crisis|Suez Moment]]. [https://andrewsullivan.substack.com/p/americas-suez-moment-b4d]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lebanon===&lt;br /&gt;
* Islamic Republic claims. [https://www.ryandawson.org/p/presstv-colleague-hit-by-israel-drone PressTV reporter hit by Israeli drone while reporting live].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Senior US officials: Israel maintains ‘right to defend itself against’ Hezbollah attacks under US-Iran deal. “The deal is a ceasefire, and it will not be a one-way ceasefire,” an official said on Monday. [https://www.jns.org/news/u-s-news/senior-us-officials-israel-maintains-right-to-defend-itself-against-hezbollah-attacks-under-us-iran-deal].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Senior US official. Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon not a condition for deal.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/428677]&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:55, June 15, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alastair Crooke]]: [https://youtu.be/5RrorBzJhgs IRAN’S TRIGGER WARNING: ‘Withdraw from Lebanon… Any Violations and We Strike].&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RobSmith|RobSmith]] ([[User talk:RobSmith|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* While US Iran reach a deal via biased Pakistan/Qatar, Iran's Hezbollah attack... [https://www.timesofisrael.com/amid-us-iran-deal-idf-says-hezbollah-continues-attacking-troops-in-south-lebanon/ Amid U.S.-Iran Deal, Hizbullah Continues Attacking IDF Troops in South Lebanon]&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 14:45, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:*''[[Times of Israel]]'': &amp;quot;A senior US official told reporters on Monday that the MOU signed a day earlier with Iran is '''not conditioned on Israel withdrawing from Lebanon.''' However, '''the deal still envisions a [[ceasefire]] that covers Lebanon''', as well as Iran, the US official said in a briefing with reporters.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::Comment: What's happening is fairly simple to see: US [[negotiator]]s are saying, &amp;quot;We can't control what [[Israel]] does&amp;quot; and [[Iran]]ian negotiators are saying &amp;quot;We can't control what [[Hezbollah]] does.&amp;quot; So the can gets kicked down the road. Nonetheless, Iran does not concede its demand that Israel withdraw from Lebanon, not just a [[ceasefire]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:01, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::*Open Source Intel: [https://x.com/Osint613/status/2066291045478912364?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw Iranian Mehr News Agency has published the supposed 14 clauses of the MOU];&lt;br /&gt;
:::::This item here:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::*&amp;quot;Iran's missile program and '''support for resistance groups''' are '''removed from the agenda entirely&amp;quot;''' &lt;br /&gt;
:::::is what gives the [[American]] side the right or position to claim it cannot control [[Israel]]i actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iran===&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[The American Conservative]]'': [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/trump-just-changed-the-iran-conversation/ Trump Just Changed the Conversation About Iran]. ''[[Washington, D.C.|Washington]] and [[Tehran]] need not be enemies forever.''&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|“We got along very well with [[Iran]],” [[Trump]] said on Monday in a joint press conference with [[France]]’s [[President Emmanuel Macron]]. “I find them to be more [[rational]], very smart,” Trump told [[NBC News]] last week.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*''[[NYT]]'': [https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/15/world/middleeast/israel-netanyahus-iran-strategy.html &amp;quot;While Mr. Trump has praised Iran's new supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, as pragmatic, he has called Mr. Netanyahu crazy, ungrateful and lacking in judgment&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Stockman]]: [https://davidstockman.substack.com/p/on-the-donalds-surrender-to-the-mullahs On The Donald’s Surrender To The Mullahs: Good for America But Too Late To Save His Own Skin].&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;This last and most pathetic [[Regime Change]] [[War]] may finally destroy the [[UniParty]] [[consensus]] which has prevailed since the end of the [[Cold War]] in 1991; and set off a [[civil war]] in the [[Republican party]] that may finally rid the remnant that emerges from the baleful grasp of the [[Bibi]]/[[neocon]] [[Fifth Column]]. Stated differently, what the neocons will denounce as the Donald’s surrender will underscore better than anything else that the [[war]] was a gigantic mistake;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:*''[[Daily Caller]]'': [https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/16/donald-trump-iran-mou-peace-deal-israel-netanyahu-neocons-iranian-hardliners/ Here Are The 3 Factions Slipping Poison Pills Into Trump’s Peace Process].&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;the Israelis, the Iran Hawks and Israel Firsters, and hardliners in the Iranian regime.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::*[[Paul Craig Roberts]]: '[https://thealtworld.com/paul_craig_roberts/israel-first-is-prevailing-over-america-first Israel First Is Prevailing Over America First]. ''Betrayal by [[Trump]] and the [[Republican]]s.''&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Daily Mail]]'': [https://youtu.be/8wMoKLuL8Jc How Iran's $100k missile destroyed $1.5bn of US equipment].&lt;br /&gt;
:$100,000 is 1/15,000 of $1.5 Billion; is this why the boys in the [[Pentagon]] need another half Trillion ($500,000,000,000) in the War budget so it can fail again at a crucial time in coming years and decades? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:27, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Full text of the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America, jointly and in good faith, agreed on the following on June 18, 2026:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The Islamic Republic of Iran, the United States of America, and their allies in the current war, by signing this memorandum of understanding, declare an immediate and permanent cessation of military operations on all fronts, including Lebanon, and commit not to initiate any war or military operation against each other henceforth, to refrain from threats or use of force against each other, and to guarantee the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Lebanon. The final agreement will confirm the permanent end of the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, and the other provisions of this clause.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America commit to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America commit to conduct negotiations and reach a final agreement within a maximum of 60 days, extendable by mutual consent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Immediately upon signing this memorandum of understanding, the United States of America will begin lifting its naval blockade and any harassment or obstruction against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will completely end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, ship traffic will be proportional to the pre-war traffic volume as established by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America also commits to withdraw its military forces from the peripheral area of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. Upon signing this memorandum of understanding, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make arrangements with its utmost effort for the safe passage of commercial ships, free of charge for only 60 days, from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa. Commercial ship traffic will commence immediately and will be established within 30 days considering the necessity of removing technical and military obstacles and mine clearance by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Islamic Republic of Iran will negotiate with the Sultanate of Oman to determine the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz, in accordance with applicable international law and the sovereign rights of the coastal countries of the Strait of Hormuz, and will also consult with other Persian Gulf coastal countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. The United States of America commits, together with its regional partners, to create a definitive program agreed upon by both parties for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran, providing at least 300 billion dollars. The implementation mechanism of this program will be finalized as part of the final agreement within 60 days. All necessary approvals, waivers, and licenses for the related financial transactions will be provided by the United States of America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. The United States of America commits to end all types of sanctions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including United Nations Security Council resolutions, International Atomic Energy Agency Board of Governors resolutions, and all unilateral U.S. sanctions, both primary and secondary, according to a timetable agreed upon as part of the final agreement. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the fundamental importance of the issue of sanction removal mentioned above and express their intention to address these matters promptly in negotiations to reach a mutual agreement on them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. The Islamic Republic of Iran reaffirms that it will not produce or acquire nuclear weapons. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America have agreed that the status of stored enriched materials will be resolved through a mechanism agreed upon by both parties and according to the timetable set forth in clause 7, at least by dilution on site, under the supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Both parties also agree to discuss the issue of enrichment and other mutually agreed topics related to the nuclear needs of the Islamic Republic of Iran based on a satisfactory framework to be agreed upon in the final agreement. The final agreement will confirm the provisions of this clause. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America acknowledge the fundamental importance of the nuclear issues mentioned above and express their intention to address these matters promptly in negotiations to reach a mutual agreement on them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America agree to maintain the status quo until a final agreement is reached; the Islamic Republic of Iran will maintain the status quo in its nuclear program, and the United States of America will not impose any new sanctions against Iran nor deploy additional military forces in the region.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. The United States of America commits to immediately issuing waivers from the Treasury Department for the export of Iranian crude oil, petrochemical products and their derivatives, and all related services including banking transactions, insurance, transportation, etc., upon signing this memorandum of understanding and until the sanctions are lifted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. The United States of America commits to fully making available the limited or blocked funds and assets of the Islamic Republic of Iran for use upon implementation of this memorandum of understanding. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran will mutually agree on the procedure for releasing these funds during the negotiations. These funds, whether held in the main account or transferred, must be fully usable for payment to any ultimate beneficiary designated by the Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America commits to issuing all necessary approvals and licenses in this regard.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America agree to establish an executive mechanism to monitor the successful implementation of this memorandum of understanding and future adherence to the final agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13. After signing this memorandum of understanding and subject to the commencement of implementation of clauses 1, 4, 5, 10, and 11 of this memorandum and the continuation of these actions, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States of America will exclusively begin negotiations on the remaining clauses of the final agreement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14. The final agreement will be endorsed by a binding resolution of the United Nations Security Council.&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Europe===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://thepeacemonger.substack.com/p/piracy-in-the-english-channel Piracy in the English channel].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/18/hegseth-announces-six-month-review-of-u-s-posture-as-part-of-nato-3-0/ Hegseth Announces Six-Month Review of U.S. Posture as Part of NATO 3.0].&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Zhirinovsky]]: [https://www.bankingnews.gr/ta-paraksena/articles/870683/the-world-will-be-on-fire-zhirinovsky-s-nightmarish-prophecy-for-2026-global-chaos-to-grip-the-planet NATO will collapse in 2026].&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://t.me/Slavyangrad/166972 ‘NATO has been a paper tiger and a one-way street for too long. This will not continue’ - Hegseth.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[News Forensics]]: [https://julianmacfarlane.substack.com/p/the-economics-of-war The Economics of War].&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;[[War]]s begin, are fought, and end. What is it all about? [[Greed]]. [[Money]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alastair Crooke]]: [https://youtu.be/1e00cv3DnI8 'The Petrodollar era is now collapsing'].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's not just inflation, but ridiculously high [[minimum wage]] rates that are reducing teen employment. Employers can't afford the state-mandated $18/hour for untrained kids. (Don't just quote the leftist Associated Press; try ''[[Fortune Magazine]]''. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:29, June 20, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==AI news==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/removing-ai-spyware-from-your-google-account.html Removing AI Spyware From Your Google Account].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Arms control==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bulletin of Atomic Scientists]]: [https://thebulletin.org/premium/2026-05/washington-should-pursue-trilateral-arms-control/ The United States, Russia, China, and arms control].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==MAGA split==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://dailycaller.com/2026/06/19/maga-influencers-white-house-daily-mail-report-foreign-influence-campaigns-israel-netanyahu-iran-us-deal/ MAGA Influencers Are Wearing Out Their White House Welcome].&lt;br /&gt;
:Loomer, &amp;quot;CJ Pearson, Rob Smith, Arynne Wexler, Emily Wilson (known as Emily Saves America) and Students for Trump co-founder Ryan Fournier&amp;quot;. [https://archive.ph/bWzlJ#selection-1367.84-1367.213]&lt;br /&gt;
::Note: the Rob Smith mentioned is not myself, although [[User:Conservative]] could be reported to [[Sebastian Gorka]]'s [[counterterrorism]] office as a [https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-thinks-ex-ally-tucker-151342902.html &amp;quot;leftwing extremist&amp;quot;] for his &amp;quot;pro-[[gay]], anti-[[Russian]]&amp;quot; sentiments. [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#User:Conservative.27s_obsession_with_homosexuality][https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Community_Portal&amp;amp;curid=114431&amp;amp;diff=2197193&amp;amp;oldid=2195684]  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==User:Conservative logic extrapolated==&lt;br /&gt;
There are over 300 [[gay bathhouse]]s in [[America]], and [[Donald Trump]] has done nothing to shut them down. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:42, June 11, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[Grok: Does User:Conservative of Conservapedia apparently have an affinity for gay bath houses?]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, [[User:Conservative]], a long-time administrator and prolific editor on Conservapedia since 2007, has demonstrated '''an apparent affinity for the topic of gay bathhouses through repeated contributions'''...These fit into a broader pattern where '''roughly 10–15% of their recent edits (out of hundreds) focus on Russia-related topics, blending geopolitical critique with niche details on LGBTQ+ &amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;suppression&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; under Vladimir Putin.&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:46, June 15, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]] is an admitted [[troll]], incapable of intelligent discussion who confesses that the reaction to his [[harassment]] of other editors [https://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:User_complaints#Admitted_troll makes him feel &amp;quot;alive&amp;quot;].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]] eschewing the endorsement of his claim to fame by the [[United States Justice Department]] in favor of [[Lewis Black]] tells a neutral observer everything they need to know.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sweet... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/428489 short and sweet].[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:32, June 11, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cool. Read it in [[NYP]]. Kudos Seinfeld.[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 19:25, June 11, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The &amp;quot;Peacemongers&amp;quot; are in Canada too ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/428518 Iranian-backed terror network linked to fatal shooting of Toronto police officer].&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 23:26, June 11, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Andrew Korybko]]: [[Laura Loomer]] &amp;amp; [[MAGA]] Like Her Are Wrong: “MAGA Dissidents” Aren’t A &amp;quot;Russian Influence Op&amp;quot;===&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Led by Laura Loomer, MAGA’s claim that “MAGA dissidents” like [[Candace Owens|Candace]], [[Tucker]], and now [[Tulsi]], as many of them consider her to be, are part of a “[[Russian influence operation]]” is discrediting, and this [[conspiracy theory]] is ironically similar in spirit to Candace’s conspiracy theories that they mock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Outgoing [[Director of National Intelligence]] [[Tulsi Gabbard]] released four partially declassified pages pertaining to [[US-funded Ukrainian biolabs]]. Readers can watch her announcement here, read the press release here, and access the documents here. There’s nothing new therein, just a reaffirmation that these labs exist and are indeed funded by the US, but her move set off another [[social media]] debate between Trump’s MAGA movement and what can be described as so-called “MAGA dissidents”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first is led online by Laura Loomer nowadays while the second can be considered jointly led by [[Candace Owens]] and [[Tucker Carlson]]. Former Director of the National Counterterrorism Center [[Joe Kent]] has since joined the ranks of the “MAGA dissidents” following his resignation that reportedly preceded what would have otherwise been his firing. Laura and many MAGA believe that Tulsi, who hired Joe, is also a “MAGA dissident”. Her unexpected biolabs disclosure sealed the deal for many of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ironically, despite [[MAGA]] having been accused by the [[Democrat]]s over the past decade of being a “Russian influence operation” (RIO) and Trump to this day still being seen by them as “[[Putin]]’s puppet”, Laura and many other MAGA nowadays conspiracy theorize that the “MAGA dissidents” are RIOs....&amp;quot; [https://korybko.substack.com/p/laura-loomer-and-maga-like-her-are]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note: It was [[User:Conservative]], like [[transgender]] pretender [[Laura Loomer]] [https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/a76cfo/mossad_agent_laura_loomer_before_he_became_a_woman/], who took the lead in smearing MAGA as a RIO in [[Conservapedia]] following [[Hillary Clinton]] &amp;amp; the [[Democrat]]s' direction. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:13, June 13, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Is Andrew Korybko anti [[US]]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:54, June 13, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::No. He's only given one interview that I know of. Oddly, he's a Pole resident in Moscow. Recently he published an article with some personal views, [https://korybko.substack.com/p/heres-why-im-a-proud-volhynia-genocide Here’s Why I’m A Proud Volhynia Genocide Activist]. From his perch at Moscow University, he gives us some of the most timely and insightful views on Russian [[foreign policy]] and internal politics. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:51, June 13, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''[[Times of India]]'': [https://youtu.be/Qu9qzAyMM3E HUGE WIN For Putin: Tulsi Gabbard EXPOSES 40+ US-Funded Biolabs In Ukraine | ‘Anthrax, Ebola…’]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Govt Advisors SHRED Documents Detailing Fauci Obama-Era Work With Wuhan Lab.PNG|right|275px|thumb|In February 2022 it was reported that government advisors shredded documents detailing the Obama administration's work with the Wuhan Lab.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The reports say nothing about how the [[Zelensky regime]] - with [[US]] tax dollar support - murdered [[Russia]]'s chief investigator into [[US biolabs in Ukraine]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:18, June 13, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As [[Andrew Korybko]] rightly observed, [https://www.dni.gov/files/BIOLAB_Slides.pdf &amp;quot;There’s nothing new therein&amp;quot;] which was reported in our [[U.S. funded biological labs abroad]] article. But [[User:Conservative]]'s [[trolling]], with Andy's consent, cut off any further expansion on the subject more than two years ago, [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:57, June 14, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Andrew Korybko]]: [https://korybko.substack.com/p/tulsis-us-funded-ukrainian-biolabs Tulsi’s US-Funded Ukrainian Biolabs Disclosure Is Incredibly Important To The National Debate]===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Many [[MAGA]] remember being defamed as “[[Russian]] [[propagandist]]s” for believing this.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
It matters little now that the damage is done, and rather than an enforceable [[policy]] solution to deal with [[User:Conservative]]'s [[harassment]] and [[trolling]] of editors, we have a [[software]] solution that takes 15 minutes to fix a typo. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:57, June 14, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;It’s unthinkable that the [[Democrat]]s would ever fight amongst themselves like [[MAGA]] is doing. For instance, no prominent member of their movement on Laura’s level would ever condemn a Democrat official for revealing that [[Trump 1.0]] or [[Trump 2.0|2.0]] lied about something of [[international]] significance, let alone accuse them and those who agree with the [[fact]]s that they shared of being part of a foreign influence operation. This is unique to MAGA due to '''the many petty personal feuds within this movement.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;'''The [[Democrat]]s have every reason to exploit these divisions''' ahead of [[2026 Midterms|November’s midterms]] and then of course going into the [[2028 presidential election]] in an attempt to recapture control of the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;and they will, given the millions of bytes of [[liberal claptrap]] on this issue that Andy has allowed [[User:Conservative]] to pollute [[Conservapedia]] with&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;While Russia dislikes Trump reneging on the “Spirit of Anchorage”, which is understood to refer to him promising Putin to coerce Zelensky into withdrawing from [[Donbass]] in exchange for ceasing hostilities, [[Republican]]s overall tend to be relatively (keyword) more [[pragmatic]] towards [[Russia]] than Democrats.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[https://slaynews.com/report-obama-involved-foreign-biolabs-developing-deadly-pathogens/ Report: Obama ‘Involved’ in Foreign Biolabs Developing Deadly Pathogens]===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama biolabs.PNG|right|300px|thumb|[https://archive.is/Ao20N| Biolabs in Ukraine]. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
I have much I could add to this &amp;quot;incredibly important issue to the national debate&amp;quot;, only I don't have time to deal with [[User:Conservative]]'s [[idiocy]] nor Andy's refusal to do anything about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:05, June 15, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Who Was [[MI6]]’s Inside Man Against [[Donald Trump]]? [[Pompeo]] Unmasked===&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;[[SARS-CoV-2]], which we now accept in hindsight was a U.S. military and intelligence operation utilizing a virus created in a [[Wuhan, China]] biological lab. The global response to the virus was a combined military and intelligence operation. The most excessive ‘[[western]]’ reactions to the virus were carried out by New Zealand, Australia, the U.K and Canada, all [[five-eyes]] countries.  The November 2020 election result was specifically an outcome of the virus and fraudulent mail-in ballots.&amp;quot; [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2026/06/13/pompeo-unmasked/?lctg=66158495]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Loomer predicts false flag attack in US to kill peace deal===&lt;br /&gt;
[https://youtu.be/Vlix1UrPAcA] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:00, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==America kills Indian sailors==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[United States]] killed three [[Indian]] sailors to enforce [[Iranian]] sanctions. This was equally as [[stupid]] as killing the 86-year-old Pope of [[Shia]] [[Islam]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the [[US]] does not even [[import]] any [[Persian Gulf]] oil. Nor did we win any support or accolades from &amp;quot;allies&amp;quot;, India, Australia, Japan, South Korea and others who depend on Persian Gulf oil. Whose idea was this? Trump? Hegseth?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not how to win friends and influence people. It is the bluster and [[false]] [[pride]] in [[User:Conservative]]'s [[idiot]]ic [[trolling]] screeds that motivates such behavior. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:00, June 14, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|This is going to be a big problem for the United States. I think India US relationships is going to be an issue here. The US is trying to use India more and more as a trading partner. Trying to use India to do repairs for US naval forces out in the region. The loss of access into the Persian Gulf means that repair facilities are limited for the US in that region. India is really the fallback. If not, you're heading to Singapore and the US is finding it very difficult to maintain naval forces out in the Persian Gulf. They are having to commit a large portion of its chartered tanker fleet and auxiliary vessels to keep two carrier battle groups, an amphibious strike group and another amphibious strike group put into a position where they can operate in this region. It is difficult and it is causing a strain and I don't care what the Navy says. I know what's happening here. It is very difficult to conduct this operation over a protracted period of time. There is a finite number to this and they're going to have to readjust and figure out how to continue this operation and India is really key for that. India is a great staging base. You can get supplies, you can do repairs. And obviously these strikes against these vessels that are violating the US blockade and have Indian crew members on board is important one to figure out. [https://youtu.be/xosw8iFTzsc]}}&lt;br /&gt;
We're off on the wrong foot after the loss of Persian Gulf bases. We could lose the whole [[Indian Ocean]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:34, June 14, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We've actually previously discussed this. Vertical launch [[Tomahawk cruise missile]]s from US ships, such as were launched at [[Iran]] to kill 168 school girls, cannot be reloaded at sea. It will take a long time &amp;quot;in the foreseeable future&amp;quot; for the Indian government to convince the Indian people that allowing US bases in India, after the US having demonstrated no respect or regard for the life of Indian people, is a good or advantageous idea. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD: Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:43, June 14, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mark Wauck]]: [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/text-of-mou-released-major-geopolitical]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|with regard to the facilitation of the full development of the [[International North–South Transport Corridor]]. As we’ve discussed numerous times in the past, it’s simply impossible to over-estimate the importance of this initiative. '''Based on stupid actions by the US during its [[Epic Fury|war on Iran]]—&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;especially the murder of Indian sailors&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;'''—I strongly believe that this will lead to a tighter integration of [[India]] and [[Pakistan]] with [[BRICS]]—as well as all [[GCC|the Gulf states]]. The US simply can’t compete with this. This is as much a victory for BRICS as it is for Iran, and it’s ipso facto a major defeat for [[Anglo]]-[[Zionist]] [[financial]]-[[military]] [[hegemony]].}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;stupid actions&amp;quot; in the sphere of [[American foreign policy]]. This is one big reason I'm so critical of Andy allowing [[User:Conservative]]'s [[spam]] and [[trolling]] and not abiding by a [[Topic Ban]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:54, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Arizona Democratic Candidate Cast As Rural Working Mom Is a Millionaire Consultant With Deep Soros Ties, Wants Sex Work Decriminalized To Help ‘Trans Women of Color’ ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arizona Democratic Candidate Cast As Rural Working Mom Is a Millionaire Consultant With Deep Soros Ties, Wants Sex Work Decriminalized To Help ‘Trans Women of Color’&lt;br /&gt;
Free Beacon | June 15, 2026 | Andrew Kerr.&lt;br /&gt;
JoAnna Mendoza owns stake in a political consulting firm worth up to $5 million.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://freebeacon.com/democrats/arizona-democratic-candidate-cast-as-rural-working-mom-is-a-millionaire-consultant-with-deep-soros-ties-wants-sex-work-decriminalized-to-help-trans-women-of-color/]&lt;br /&gt;
Or the color of...money![[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 17:10, June 15, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The case of Christian ex cop who dared to criticize Islamofascism... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ex-Police Officer Settles Christian Discrimination Case in the UK&lt;br /&gt;
NTD Good Morning. Jun-16-2026.&lt;br /&gt;
Former British police officer Luke Salmons has reached a legal settlement after claiming he faced discrimination because of his Christian beliefs. Salmons says he was suspended after questioning aspects of Islam and raising concerns during workplace training sessions&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.ntd.com/ntdplus/ex-police-officer-settles-christian-discrimination-case-in-the-uk_1152761.html][[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 10:44, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lebanese President Joseph Aoun's Dramatic Declarations Of Sovereignty: Lebanon Belongs To The Lebanese, Not To Iran ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MEMRI&lt;br /&gt;
@MEMRIReports&lt;br /&gt;
Jun 14&lt;br /&gt;
#ICYMI: [[Lebanese]] President Joseph Aoun's Dramatic Declarations Of Sovereignty: #Lebanon Belongs To The Lebanese, Not To #Iran; We Want To Live In Peace And Not Die In [[Iran]]'s Wars - Report &amp;amp; audio here ow.ly/LqRH50ZaC2X #MEMRI&lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/MEMRIReports/status/2066200995785539635][[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 14:50, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Trump on [[FOX]] today:&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;I tell you what – Israel is fighting Hizbullah too long and too many people are being killed. And you don’t have to knock down an apartment house every time you are looking for somebody. Because there are a lot of people in those apartment houses and not all are Hizbullah. That I can tell you.&amp;quot; [https://www.foxnews.com/video/6398549901112] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:10, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
* Yes, he has to throw some bones at Qatar &amp;amp; co., especially in the G7 meeting...and he also suggested [[Syria]]'s A Sharaa goes in and clean Hezbollah because he did it so fast in his own country.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:28, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::True. [[MoA]] breaks down how [[Trump]] may be trying to incite more [[Sunni]]/[[Shia]] sectarian [[violence]] like in the good ol' days of the [[Islamic State]]. [https://www.moonofalabama.org/2026/06/lebanon-u-s-offers-to-ignite-sectarian-war.html] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:41, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*''[[Zerohedge]]'': [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/trump-vance-virtually-sign-us-iran-deal-hormuz-fears-ease-energy-flows-remain-months Deal Doubts Arise As Lebanese, Iranian Officials Say US Must Rein In Israel To Secure Regional Peace].&lt;br /&gt;
::So evidently the criticism by Lebanese officials isn't just against Iran. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:22, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Update: [https://youtu.be/A1ic3tpmRtk?t=305 &amp;quot;What Marco Rubio told Aoun, the head of Lebanon, who's not his own man if you'll pardon the pun...&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
So much for &amp;quot;[[sovereignty]]&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:17, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Days before the UFC massacre plot for a &amp;quot;revolution,&amp;quot; [[Tucker Carlson]] incited for revolution  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/nosoup4knowles/status/2065430772329091266 June 12, 2026].&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|Tucker Carlson claims he doesn't want a violent revolution while simultaneously telling Americans &amp;quot;there's no way for them to nonviolently change the system&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/nosoup4knowles/status/2065430772329091266]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tucker also spoke about a revolution months ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:25, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(A) Pretty weak link between Tucker and what appears to be another garden variety [[FBI]] [[psyop]] or [[false flag]]; (B) Tucker obviously in the same clip disavows [[violence]] and is referring to how others can/may react, etc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:33, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* So which is it, a &amp;quot;weak link&amp;quot; or a so called &amp;quot;false flag&amp;quot;? He knows he has a dangerous mic. &amp;quot;Disavowed violence&amp;quot;? more like a KKK saying &amp;quot;kill the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;juice&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;quot;, in order not to be arrested...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:48, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Update: [https://youtu.be/tX5ygvEr3Y8 FBI Whistleblower Explains Foiled UFC Plot: Bona Fide Plan or Gretchen Whitmer Fed-Napping 2.0?] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:41, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He is &amp;quot;just asking questions&amp;quot; &amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;innocent&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt; Tucker ... 👀 😂 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Did Tucker Carlson Decide That ‘America First’ Means Supporting Iran?&lt;br /&gt;
By Ben M. Freeman. June 16, 2026&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2012, Tucker Carlson described the Islamic Republic of Iran as “evil” and its leaders as “lunatics.” He even argued that the Iranian regime “deserves to be annihilated.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the time, Carlson recognized a reality that remains unchanged today: the Islamic Republic is not a normal state pursuing normal state interests. It is a revolutionary regime built on repression, proxy warfare, and regional destabilization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What makes Carlson’s evolution particularly striking is that he is often presented as one of the leading voices of the America First movement. Iran is not merely an adversary of Israel. For nearly half a century, the Islamic Republic has defined itself in opposition to the United States, funded groups responsible for killing Americans, attacked American interests across the Middle East, and built a foreign policy around hostility toward both Washington and its allies.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.algemeiner.com/2026/06/16/when-did-tucker-carlson-decide-that-america-first-means-supporting-iran/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:45, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, you can take all the Tucker trashing and transfer it to Trump now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:19, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''[[Human Events]]'' ([[Ronald Reagan]]'s favorite rag): [https://humanevents.com/2026/06/16/breaking-trump-slams-israel-over-hezbollah-war-says-strikes-on-civilian-buildings-too-destructive ''BREAKING'': Trump slams Israel over Hezbollah war, says strikes on civilian buildings 'too destructive']. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:00, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump thought bashing Bibi will earn him points at G7. It didn't. Besides the bosses of the ME Qatar giving a smile , it did absolutely Zero.&lt;br /&gt;
Here is son of Hamas founder the Green Prince criticizing Trump. https://x.com/MosabHasanYOSEF/status/2066896274016579967 [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:40, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Updates:'''&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://seemorerocks.substack.com/p/netanyahu-will-reportedly-blackmail Netanyahu Will Reportedly BLACKMAIL Trump To Block Any Iran Deal], Jun 16, 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''[[Forbes]]'': [https://youtu.be/VnYTn3DkuZw Epstein Was Trying To Offer Prosecutors Dirt On Trump], Jun 16, 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Conspiracy theories]], anyone? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:14, June 16, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::&lt;br /&gt;
1. &lt;br /&gt;
Iran with its PressTV, Hezbollah all sided with Tucker. You can be against the war but one doesn't have to advocate FOR Iran like Tucker did.&lt;br /&gt;
2.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Macron]] pressured Trump over [[Ukraine]]. Frustrated.[https://thehill.com/policy/international/5926350-macron-zelensky-trump-g7-summit/] As a diversion tactic Trump criticized Netanyahu,  but it failed to gain him any favor in G7.&lt;br /&gt;
3.&lt;br /&gt;
Dear RobS, When you post these BS theories, do you believe in them?[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 00:05, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh no. But the timing is awful. ''Forbes'' can't retract the BS they evidently have now placed in people's minds. And it's hard for ''Forbes'' to argue the timing is coincidental. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Let's imagine for a minute it's all true, Epstein was a Mossad agent, Bibi holds the dirt on Trump, etc etc. How would releasing it inspire Americans of whatever political stripe to wanna go kill Iranians and destroy the evil mullocracy? No. It's only of interest to low IQ [[partisan]] voters ([[Republican]]s are not the only ones to have low IQ partisans like [[User:Conservative]]) as payback.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Bottomline: It is impossible to fight and win a [[war]] with [[partisan]] divisions in the [[population]]. Trashing left-right, liberal-conservative, Democrat-Republican does more harm to a war effort than [[anti-Semitism]] or open sympathy for the Iran regime.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:13, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:;Re that BS you posted, the Russia/Russia hoax Dossier also said the same theory about Trump that [[Putin]] blackmails him...LOL [[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 00:31, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yep. I can hear it now already on election eve in November, &amp;quot;Epstein tried to give the Trump [[DOJ]] the dirt on Trump but they killed him...&amp;quot;. etc. It takes the heat off Clinton &amp;amp; the [[Democrat]]s and puts it on Trump and the [[Republican]]s. Doesn't help Bibi &amp;amp; the [[Likud]] much in America. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:38, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Despite MOU:&lt;br /&gt;
[[IRGC]] launching nightly drone strikes on ships in Hormuz.&lt;br /&gt;
::::&lt;br /&gt;
UPDATE.&lt;br /&gt;
Iran has fired drones at commercial ships in Strait of Hormuz since signing of MoU.&lt;br /&gt;
The source added that all of the drones had been intercepted by the US military before they pose a threat to commercial or US military ships and personnel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Claim: 'Iran won't get unfrozen funds without behavior changes'. In an interview, Vice President JD Vance downplays criticism of the US-Iran deal, explaining that regional investment is conditional on Iran changing its behavior.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘Without me, there would be no Israel,’ Trump says at G7 to a smiling Qatar representative. Ambassador Huckabee defies Trump, claims US would not exist with Israel. &amp;quot;It is your heritage, without a doubt,&amp;quot; he said, &amp;quot;but it is also the heritage of the United States. Without Israel, without the Jewish foundation, there would not be America.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:07, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/trump-to-israel-let-the-al-qaeda-guy-handle-hezbollah/ Trump to Israel: Let the al-Qaeda Guy Handle Hezbollah][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 01:58, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conflicts Forum]]: [https://conflictsforum.substack.com/p/trump-crosses-the-rubicon-his-strategic 'Trump crosses the Rubicon; His strategic goal is a new chapter in US–Iran relations'].&lt;br /&gt;
::Comment: You can say it's motivated by [[domestic politics]] &amp;amp; [[2026 Midterms]], (which it is, as [[American foreign policy]] has always been), but there's no going back. 47 years of [[demonizing]] [[Iran]] is over. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:12, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Ohhh. The innocent mullah regime. 47 years of bloody crimes.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 02:22, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Compare this to his efforts to make nice with [[Kim jong-un]] during [[Trump 1.0]]. He want's something like this for his legacy. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:27, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ohhh. The innocent mullah regime. 47 years of bloody crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
*Exporting and setting up its strongholds in:&lt;br /&gt;
*Venezuela (till Maduro capture)&lt;br /&gt;
*Nicaragua (still)&lt;br /&gt;
*Argentina (in the 1990s, AMIA bombing and more)&lt;br /&gt;
*Lebanon (still)&lt;br /&gt;
*Yemen (still)&lt;br /&gt;
*Sudan (still)&lt;br /&gt;
*Iraq (still)&lt;br /&gt;
*Syria (till A Sharaa)&lt;br /&gt;
* Somalia (Quds force)&lt;br /&gt;
* Europe (especially right now via its proxy terror gangs ([[HAYI]])[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Americans are tired of fighting other people's wars. Hell, with the deep [[partisan]] divisions, they wouldn't even take up guns to defend their own god-given [[constitution]]al [[right]] to [[gay marriage]] anymore. (Call me a cynic). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Take [[France]], for example. We fought [[World War I]], [[World War II]], and the [[Vietnam war]] for the 'Glory of France', and look at France today. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:40, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::No gratitude in France. I believe.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:40, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sadly. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:01, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 15 Antifa radicals indicted, 12 arrested in sweeping federal probe into Minneapolis anti-ICE operations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15 Antifa radicals indicted, 12 arrested in sweeping federal probe into Minneapolis anti-ICE operations.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/15-antifa-radicals-indicted-12-arrested-sweeping-federal-probe-minneapolis-anti-ice-operations]. Finally some steps. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 02:20, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:As I said, there's no winning wars with [[partisan]] divisions in the population, and this widens the gap. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:33, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== JD Vance's steal of a deal? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:JD Vance - Steal of a deal. Doubts.jpg|thumb|JD Vance - Steal of a deal? Doubts.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I hope for peace, but strong doubts remain'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even Trump’s Cabinet Hates the Iran Deal.&lt;br /&gt;
CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Secretary of War Pete Hegseth all have voiced doubts about Iran’s commitment not to build a nuclear weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
Rubio and Hegseth speak to press.&lt;br /&gt;
Malcolm Ferguson. June 16, 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
CIA Director John Ratcliffe and others within the Trump administration don’t think Iran is being serious about its promise not to develop or attain nuclear weapons, according to anonymous sources from Axios.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://newrepublic.com/post/211913/trump-cabinet-hates-iran-deal TNR][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:51, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've heard the same thing - you have Radcliffe, Rubio, and Hegseth on one side with Trump &amp;amp; JD on the other. Wonder who will win that contest? Also, maybe half the $300 billion has been transferred already. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:03, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Breaking Points]]: [https://youtu.be/dhdgaPnCEhg Trump SLAMS Bibi As CIA LEAKS BEGIN].&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;[[CIA]] director, [[John Ratcliffe]], “told Trump and other senior officials intelligence gathered by the US raised serious doubts about Iran’s willingness to make nuclear concessions as the US is seeking a final deal.” You are going to see perhaps the greatest [[Deep State]] [[leak]] operation of all time,&amp;quot; [https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/mother-of-all-leak-wars-beginning Transcript]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:08, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&lt;br /&gt;
* You already posted yesterday Trump's comments. Even liberals [https://i.ibb.co/pvgHgCN1/IMG-20260617-WA0000.jpg mock] Trump &amp;quot;criticizing&amp;quot; Bibi as sad pandering to his Arab masters in Doha.&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump wants Syria to clean out Hezbollah Iran's trash from Lebanon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About numbers of &amp;quot;people killed&amp;quot;, let's not go into [https://thehill.com/opinion/international/4894462-is-britains-green-foreign-policy-innovative-or-mere-posturing/ 618,000] in [[Syria]] by Alawite/Hezbollah/Iran/Putin 2011-2024. Or current 400k deaths - upto [https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine 1.8 million] casualties between both sides in [[Russia]]/[[Ukraine]] war 2022-2026.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But let's recall Trump's words about [[Syria]]'s Al-Sharaa and [[Hezbollah]]:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:C9Pak4-W0AIldKy (1).jpg|right|450px|thumb|[http://www.defenddemocracy.org/a-conversation-with-jake-sullivan-video/ Jake Sullivan to Hillary Clinton]: Al Qaeda is on our side.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Trump said that he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to “let Syria take care of” Hezbollah. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“To be honest with you, I think they’d do a better job of doing it,” Trump said alongside Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, the emir of Qatar, during a Group of Seven meeting in France.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The president specifically praised Ahmed al-Sharaa, the president of Syria. Al-Sharaa took over the country after longtime Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad fled to Moscow when rebel troops entered Damascus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Trump noted that al-Sharaa, a former member of al-Qaeda, is “not a boy scout,” he praised the Syrian president for unifying the Middle Eastern country after its nearly 14-year civil war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“He’s very good with Hezbollah, does not like them,” the president said of al-Sharra. “And I’ll tell you what, Israel’s [been] fighting Hezbollah too long and too many people are being killed.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5928503-trump-vance-iran-deal/  Trump jokes he’ll blame Vance if Iran deal doesn’t work out]. June 17, 2026.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:01, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What happened to [https://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Main_Page/Archive_index/288#Dems._Anti-Trump_leads_to_anti-Bibi_-_.28Face_the_Nation_4.19.26.29 &amp;quot;to be anti-Trump is to be anti-Bibi?&amp;quot;] It makes as much sense as Bibi saying &amp;quot;[[Hamas]] is [[ISIS]]&amp;quot;. Trump now sounds like [[John Bolton]], [[Jake Sullivan]], and [[Hillary Clinton]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:44, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Not really.  Are you telling me that Trump can't change his mind from one day to the other? Are you asking: Did Israel lose much by Bibi putting it all in Trump basket? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not sure how a (temporary or not) disagreement between the two suddenly changes all this. Furthermore.  Even if there will be a &amp;quot;breakup&amp;quot;,  it won't change the past of dragging Bibi down by anti Trump foes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hamas]] is still like ISIS which is why they [https://www.israelhayom.com/2023/10/11/911623/ carried] [[ISIS]] flag on Oct 7 and [https://jcfa.org/hamass-propaganda-videos-an-old-new-tool-of-psychological-warfare/ copied] ISIS methods of filming own atrocities. &lt;br /&gt;
I think Bibi did a lot of mistakes in his life but calling Hamas ISIS wasn't one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I don't get your word salad what you put these all in one blender...or is it just copy pasted line from some substack?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And it's good that '''Israel didn't sign anything on the MoU'''. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Next let's see about the nukes. ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Takeaways from Trump news conference on Iran deal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author : CBS News · June 17, 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure. Well,''' the president has been making some pretty grandiose claims all week here in Evian about the things that this one and a halfpage agreement will accomplish. Most notably, he says it will prevent Iran from ever getting a nuclear weapon. But he hasn't explained how exactly the deal will do that. And the drafts that have been circulating, you know only mention Iran's nuclear program a couple of times.&lt;br /&gt;
The rest of the document deals with the Straight of Hormuz, deals with sanctions, unfreezing assets and things like that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And so I just wanted to ask him directly, why are you claiming that this particular deal is going to prevent Iran from ever getting a nuclear weapon?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And he said, well, if they try to get a nuclear weapon, then we'll just bomb them, which may be the case, but that's not the same as a deal that enforces it.&lt;br /&gt;
So, I followed up by asking him, if there's anything enforcable in this deal, any kind of mechanism that prevents Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.&lt;br /&gt;
And he kind of blew it off.&lt;br /&gt;
He said, &amp;quot;Well, what do you want me to do?&lt;br /&gt;
Sue them or take them to court? What kind of enforcement are you talking about?&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the reality is, that the two sides are about to embark on a lengthy negotiation that will involve enforcable benchmarks. That would be enforced by the US, enforced by international agencies to hopefully ensure that Iran doesn't begin nuclear development again. And whether that negotiation will be successful is still up in the air, but it's pretty clear that this memorandum of understanding does not do what President Trump claims it does, preventing Iran from ever getting a nuclear weapon.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jg11AL-hTl4][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:22, June 17, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Nobody cares. We all understand we have been massively lied to at the start of this this war in February 2026. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:03, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Did Trump see the disastrous (JD Vance's) MoU before agreeing to it? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From [https://thatthingtoo.blogspot.com/2026/06/did-trump-see-disastrous-mou-before.html ABC blog]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
It's entirely possible that Trump, the &amp;quot;Art of the Deal&amp;quot; master, never saw the details of the MoU --brokered by fake &amp;quot;friends&amp;quot; Qatar/Pakistan-- before blindly placing his confidence in JD Vance. Yet virtually no one argues that this deal is good for America. There is broad consensus across Republicans, Democrats, conservatives, and many others that the sole beneficiary would be Iran's oppressive regime and its jihadist proxies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No one believes that the $300 billion would simply be spent on &amp;quot;reconstruction.&amp;quot; Just like the regime has been doing with Obama's cash release for its annihilation nuclear program, ballistic missiles, shahed drones and other destructive weaponry; maintain and boost its jihadi proxies in Yemen, Lebanon, Iraq, Gaza, Africa, etc; spread its diabolic ideology globally; sent gangs in Europe on terror or/and murderous spree, plots and violent operations targeting dissidents and opponents abroad and attacking US and its allies with cyber attacks, among others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See genocidal Islamist government - Hamas in Gaza, prioritizing its military infrastructure, terror tunnels and weapons over the welfare of its people, while using civilians as human shields and exposing them to the consequences of its actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the details were truly so beneficial, why were they kept from public scrutiny? It's no surprise that JD Vance chose to keep the most controversial provisions under wraps. The secrecy itself raises serious questions about what supporters of the agreement did not want the public to see.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
True. Every. Word.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 12:29, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I guess Trump's just an [[idiot]] who doesn't know, understand or care about the consequences of what he's doing, huh?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The big news here of course is that [[Witkoff]] &amp;amp; [[Kushner]] got fired, and JD negotiated the deal. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:04, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::JD Vance embarrassingly admits he does not understand diplomatic protocols when asked about Iran deal. During a morning show interview, the vice president claimed that there are simply “some diplomatic protocols” that he can’t fully comprehend.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.irishstar.com/news/us-news/jd-vance-embarrassingly-admits-not-37312221]. &lt;br /&gt;
Note. You can oppose the war in Iran but you don't have to be a total loser.[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 14:54, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Neither do [[Trump]] or [[Zelensky]] understand [[diplomatic]] protocols. They both thought bilateral agreements begin with summits. Whereas summits are actually the termination point to [[ratify]] agreements worked out by the [[sherpa]]s. This MOU is closer to traditional diplomacy than what Trump has practiced and Zelenksy has proposed over the past several years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:59, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Why Trump’s Iran Deal Is A Disaster For The US | Gerard Baker.&lt;br /&gt;
Times News.&lt;br /&gt;
Jun 18, 2026.&lt;br /&gt;
The State Of It USA Podcast.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Trump has made a deal with Iran. On Friday, Vice President JD Vance will attend the official signing in Geneva of a 14-point US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding that covers the naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's nuclear ambitions, the lifting of sanctions, a $300bn reconstruction fund for Iran and a ceasefire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deal has gone down badly in the US, and with good reason. Gerry argues that it's a calamity for America and a betrayal of the Iranian people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could it also be the undoing of JD Vance? It looks like he's been set up as the fall guy in case this all goes wrong. That could scupper his presidential ambitions. And where does it leave Israel? Donald Trump was Israel's ally but with this deal, has he abandoned them?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Katy Balls, Washington editor and columnist at The Times and The Sunday Times&lt;br /&gt;
Gerard Baker, columnist at The Times and editor at large at The Wall Street Journal&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Producer: Harry Kitson&lt;br /&gt;
Executive producer: Molly Guinness&lt;br /&gt;
Picture: Getty Images&lt;br /&gt;
Audio: Times Radio, Reuters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
00:00 - Why The Iran Deal is a Calamity&lt;br /&gt;
00:37 - Breaking Down the 14-Point Peace Agreement&lt;br /&gt;
01:54 - The $300 Billion &amp;quot;Reparations&amp;quot; Fund Explained&lt;br /&gt;
03:04 - &amp;quot;An Almighty Raspberry&amp;quot;: The Republican Backlash&lt;br /&gt;
04:05 - Inside the G7 Victory Lap vs. American Reality&lt;br /&gt;
06:26 - A Disastrous Blow to America’s Global Prestige&lt;br /&gt;
07:17 - Broken Promises &amp;amp; Betrayal of the Iranian Protesters&lt;br /&gt;
09:18 - Reza Pahlavi Interview: A Missed Window of Opportunity&lt;br /&gt;
11:04 - A Seismic Rift in the US-Israel Relationship&lt;br /&gt;
14:26 - J.D. Vance: Master Architect or Ultimate Fall Guy?&lt;br /&gt;
16:41 - The Core MAGA Position on &amp;quot;Forever Wars&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
17:48 - Economic Silver Linings: Oil Prices, Inflation &amp;amp; Interest Rates&lt;br /&gt;
22:33 - How Trump’s Rivals Will Use This in the 2028 Primary&lt;br /&gt;
26:12 - Outro: Navigating the 60-Day Negotiation Window&lt;br /&gt;
[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vVDOLSsDxek]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ari Hoffman:&lt;br /&gt;
- JD Vance Shills For His Disastrous MOU.&lt;br /&gt;
- Katie Wilson orders cleanups after our reporting.&lt;br /&gt;
- WA unemployment above the national average.&lt;br /&gt;
- Dems aren't proud to be American.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.facebook.com/AriHoffmanOfficial/videos/are-you-proud-to-be-an-american/1863009317996271/][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 21:41, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The [[United States]] does not have the manpower, weapons, or industrial capacity for a different outcome. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:52, June 18, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Reconstruction fund===&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|:Para 6: &amp;quot;The United States of America undertakes with regional partners to develop a definitive, mutually agreed plan with at least U.S.D. 300 billion for the reconstruction and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The mechanism for the implementation of this plan will be finalized as part of a final deal within 60 days. All required '''licenses, waivers and permissions needed for the relevant financial transactions''' will be granted by the United States of America.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Infrastructure deals are extremely complex and very high fee and would require Iran to convey title of the assets being “reconstructed” to the fund, which is na ga happen. It is hard to see how the US, which has done the Gulf States great harm with its Iran war caper, has the leverage to get them to agree to pony up most/all of $300 billion when they have their own rebuilding needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So what does Iran do when the US fails to deliver on this commitment? The MOU already contemplates that Iran will regularize its control of the Strait of Hormuz and presumably charge fees after 60 days. We had said that Iran likely understands full well that the US cannot satisfy this requirement and might explicitly use this to '''impose fees at a level designed to realize $300 billion over time''' (as in use this explicitly with the Gulf States as an alternative to funding reconstruction). However, [[Robert Pape]] has argued that Iran will seek to maximize its power, and its highest value “ask” is for the US to withdraw forces across the region. [https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2026/06/iran-war-trump-capitulates-in-deal-signed-thursday-commits-to-israel-withdrawal-from-lebanon-considerable-obstacles-remain-to-agreement-oil-cliff-in-play-increasing-iran-leverage.html]}}&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike [[Ukraine aid]], the Reconstruction fund is not envisioned to come directly out of the pockets of US taxpayers. Waivers in [[SWIFT]] network transactions to pay tolls, withdrawal of [[economic sanctions]], etc. are pledged. If the US needs to pony up any cash, it is offset by closure of US bases in the region, and adds nothing to the [[deficit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, the denial of [[justice]] for the murder of the Iranian [[head of state]], school children, [[civilian]] [[infrastructure]], etc etc etc in a [[war of aggression]] is not a &amp;quot;[[conservative value]]&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:32, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;quot;reconstruction fund&amp;quot; should not be thought of automatically as a &amp;quot;reparation fund&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:38, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The 300 Billion dollars for the mullah regime===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics from both sides of the isle expressed concern [https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/06/18/parts-trumps-iran-deal-sharply-criticized-by-some-key-republicans/] - &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/top-senate-republican-rips-trumps-iran-deal-says-300-billion-makes-obama-deal-look-like-a-pittance] - &lt;br /&gt;
[https://thenationaldesk.com/news/americas-news-now/senate-armed-services-chair-republican-roger-wicker-blasts-president-trumps-iran-deal-agreement-negotiates-away-the-victories] - &lt;br /&gt;
[https://lillydigitalmedia.com/new-details-in-us-iran-framework-300-billion-fund-for-iran-draws-criticism/] - &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/press-releases/uani-statement-on-us-iran-memorandum-of-understanding] over [[Pakistan]]-[[Qatar]]-[[JD Vance]]'s MoU, which includes, asides from lifting sanctions, a 300 Billion dollars for Iran, with no guardrails if the regime won't use it, as always, for domestic and international bloodshed and oppression.. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 12:27, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:If that were true, it's pretty [[idiot]]ic of [[Trump]] to have signed on. Fortunately in context with the rest of the document, it's not true. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|WWJD? Would he claim 2 gay bathhouses in Russia compared to 300 in America justifies nuclear war?]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:39, June 19, 2026 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2166196</id>
		<title>User:Ed Poor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2166196"/>
		<updated>2025-10-15T15:36:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Formatting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I taught math and English at a private school in New York City until my retirement in 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
I believe in being bold, a habit I learned to cherish at Wikipedia. But I also believe in correcting my mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;one of the greatest and most influential Conservapedia sysops&amp;quot; - Anonymous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am first and foremost a believer in science, and yet I believe that God is the First Scientist. I believe Romans 1:20 provides a clue to the fact of God's [[Creation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I have made over 20,000 edits to Conservapedia, although a lot of these are merely quoted [[/factoids]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Years at Conservapedia: {{age|2007|3|19}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Years at Wikipedia: {{age|2001|11|29}} &lt;br /&gt;
:*I started over 1,100 articles there.&lt;br /&gt;
:Years opposed to [[atheism]]: {{age|1977|8|1}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I maintain accounts at a few other wiki projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some people regard me as a &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nationalcenter.org/2005/07/poor-uneducated-and-easy-to-command.html &amp;quot;poor, undereducated and easily led&amp;quot;] religious man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Favorite movies==&lt;br /&gt;
In no particular order:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Old Yeller]] - {{years ago|1957}} years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes to add to articles==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lack of freedom under Communist rule===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maltz’s experience with a “thought control committee” of the Hollywood Party [http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=8914]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Global warming theory===&lt;br /&gt;
“OVER the past 15 years air temperatures at the Earth’s surface have been flat while greenhouse-gas emissions have continued to soar. The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO2 put there by humanity since 1750. And yet, as James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, observes, ‘the five-year mean global temperature has been flat for a decade. . . .’” [http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/04/28/the-disgraceful-episode-of-lysenkoism-brings-us-global-warming-theory/2/#175bfcee2364]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reputation of the [[United States]], [[Arab media]], [[Soviet propaganda]], [[Western imperialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*The US fares poorly in Arab media, partly because it was the target of Soviet propaganda for a half century and inherited all the criticism of Western imperialism. [http://www.amazon.com/Un-Civil-War-Words-International/dp/0275993930/ref=la_B001IYVP8S_1_1?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1381925797&amp;amp;sr=1-1 Choice] - review of ''(Un)Civil War of Words: Media and Politics in the Arab World'' by [[Mamoun Fandy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[drive-in]] or&lt;br /&gt;
[[drive-in restaurant]]&lt;br /&gt;
*The drive-in restaurant was a phenomenon that sprang up in the early thirties, and it was becoming very popular. Rather than being invited into a dining room to eat, customers would drive into a parking lot around a small restaurant, place their orders with carhops, and receive their food on trays right in their cars. The food was served on china plates complete with glassware and metal utensils. It was a timely idea in a society that was becoming faster paced and increasingly mobile. [http://www.scribd.com/doc/170418702/The-21-Irrefutable-Laws-of-Leadership-Workbook-Revised-Updated]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ideas about leadership==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;You can have everything in life you want, if you will just help other people get what they want.&amp;quot; - [[Zig Ziglar]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Cherish your visions and your dreams as they are the children of your soul, the blueprints of your ultimate achievements.&amp;quot; - [[Napoleon Hill]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key to success is to focus our conscious mind on things we desire not things we fear.&amp;quot; - [[Brian Tracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Success is getting what you want. Happiness is wanting what you get.&amp;quot; - [[Dale Carnegie]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Obstacles are necessary for success because in selling, as in all careers of importance, victory comes only after many struggles and countless defeats.&amp;quot; - [[Og Mandino]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;A real decision is measured by the fact that you've taken a new action. If there's no action, you haven't truly decided.&amp;quot; - [[Tony Robbins]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;If you can't control your anger, you are as helpless as a city without walls waiting to be attacked.&amp;quot; - [[The Book of Proverbs]]&lt;br /&gt;
#A mediocre person tells. A good person explains. A superior person demonstrates. A great person inspires others to see for themselves.&amp;quot; - [[Harvey Mackay]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Freedom, privileges, options, must constantly be exercised, even at the risk of inconvenience.&amp;quot; - [[Jack Vance]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Take care of your body. It's the only place you have to live.&amp;quot; - [[Jim Rohn]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The number of times I succeed is in direct proportion to the number of times I can fail and keep on trying.&amp;quot; - [[Tom Hopkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;You have everything you need to build something far bigger than yourself.&amp;quot; - [[Seth Godin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==To Do List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CPUSA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*:The Party tried very hard to present Communist or Socialist ideas as an advance in America’s development that was in fact rooted in American tradition. Well, they failed in this. The American people couldn’t buy it. The association with the Soviet Union was too powerful.  I remember one slogan, “Defend the Soviet Union.” It was not “Defend the Socialist Idea” or “Defend a Fairer System.”  It was “Defend the Soviet Union.” It was a tough slogan to sell; impossible. &lt;br /&gt;
*the so-called anti-[[fascism]] of the CPUSA:&lt;br /&gt;
*:Moreover, the radical shifts and reversals in the policy of the CPUSA did not reflect developments on the American socio-economic scene itself, and were not reactions to them. On the contrary, they had their source in a foreign country and its interests, in the specific responses of the government of the USSR to events in Europe. One classic case is of course the American Party’s faithful support of the Hitler-Stalin Pact of 1939-1941. The alliance was a startling reversal after years of proclaimed Party dedication to ferocious “anti-Fascism.” Instead, the line switched from “anti-Fascism” to “peace,” i.e. a ferocious dedication to keeping the US from aiding the nations fighting Hitler (“The Yanks are NOT coming! We’ll be for peace until the cows come home!” to quote Herbert Biberman). Yet just as the Party’s staunch “anti-Fascism” ended the moment that Stalin became Hitler’s friend, so the Party’s staunch belief in “the peace movement” ended the moment the Soviet Union was attacked by the Nazis on 22 June 1941. Then the war against Hitler finally became justified.20&lt;br /&gt;
*[[intellectual control]]&lt;br /&gt;
*:the Party in Hollywood not only attempted to control the minds of its members, but that it was a secret organization.&lt;br /&gt;
*:#Paul Jarrico in a 1983 interview noted without much comment that it was a Party rule that no one who was in analysis could be a member of the Party: “It was a security rule.” This comes right after he asserts that the claims of Party thought-control over its membership are greatly exaggerated. See Jarrico in McGilligan and Buhle, 344-345.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American Communists]]&lt;br /&gt;
*the [[lionization of the Unfriendly Ten]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bartley Crum]] was wary of&lt;br /&gt;
*:the American Communists, because they were not in fact independent individuals but were men under stern Party intellectual discipline.  He found them continually deceptive as to their intentions and motives. Crum was repelled by the Communists’ “rude, plodding dogmatism, their habit of secrecy,” and that included the behavior of the Party lawyers assigned to work with him on the case. [http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=8914]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[inequality in America]] [http://www.forbes.com/sites/quickerbettertech/2011/12/12/if-i-was-a-poor-black-kid/]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[gun control laws]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[right-to-carry laws]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[gun ownership and crime]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Castle Doctrine]] - you don't have to retreat as far as possible before defending yourself&lt;br /&gt;
*[[federal assault weapons ban]] 1994-2004&lt;br /&gt;
*[[gun rights cases]] decided by the [[Supreme Court]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DC handgun ban]] - struck down in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chicago handgun ban]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[impact of gun bans on crime and suicide rates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[gun ownership]] and gov't regulation of it&lt;br /&gt;
*[[multiple victim public shootings]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[gun show regulations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brady law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Christ-our-pilot.jpg|thumb|279px|Let Him be my guide.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Archives: [[/archive 01|01]]  [[/archive 02|02]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{User:Ed Poor/quote{{ #expr: {{rand|5}} }}}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==More about me, myself and I==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&amp;amp;username=&amp;amp;group=sysop&amp;amp;limit=100 Sysops]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/Ed Poor|Contribs]] • &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;002bb8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|user={{urlencode:Ed Poor}}}} Blocks]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; • &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;002bb8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[{{fullurl:Special:Log/protect|user={{urlencode:Ed Poor}}}} Protects]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; • &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;002bb8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[{{fullurl:Special:Log/delete|user={{urlencode:Ed Poor}}}} Deletions]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Ipblocklist|List of blocked IPs and users]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userboxtop}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User Wikipedian}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User OEC}}  &lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox |red|red|[[Image:Bost.jpg‎|45px]]|This user is a '''Boston Red Sox''' fan.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User talk self}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userboxbottom}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[/math]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/template]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Admin stuff==&lt;br /&gt;
I am a SYSOP on this site, elected unanimously by the student board on my 6th day here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True wikis have simple, clear rules. Otherwise it is a mobocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I learned the basics of [[PHP]] in May 2007 and created an online database for my church's missionary outreach effort in Harlem, NY. Plans to expand the database application to the regional or national level went nowhere, but I did get hired as webmaster of UpTV.org and did some consulting on a major overhaul on the http://www.upf.org website. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Q: Is this your personal blog, or what?!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A: No, but it just so happens that nearly every word I type, link I create, article or template I start - gains instant and widespread acceptance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Q: Isn't that a bit &amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;arrogant&amp;quot;&amp;gt;arrogant&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A: Okay, I guess you're right. Perhaps I should be more humble.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikipedia and Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a time when Wikipedia was a [[meritocracy]], and I rose rapidly through the ranks then. I got Jimbo to create the Mediation and Arbitration committees, so he wouldn't have to be the sheriff all the time. I became the first elected bureaucrat, and pioneered the system whereby admins could enforce rules without having to take everything before a committee. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I didn't see the [[anti-elitism]] creeping up and choking the life out of the place. [[Larry Sanger]] was right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My only worry about Conservapedia is that it '''might''' make the equal and opposite mistake; it has certainly been accused of it, hundreds of times. But senior staff have been amazingly tolerant of opposing ideas here so far and I reason to hope they will continue to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Etc.==&lt;br /&gt;
My interests include history, religion, and science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've also taught SAT math prep, so if your article has any errors in arithmetic or statistics, prepare for a shock. I might just delete your entire contribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm also pretty good at science, logic, history, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any trouble on the site, a question about my edits/blocks/redirects/protects etc. please post on my talk page or email me and I will address them ASAP. I am open to working with everyone who demonstrates a genuine will to improve this site through their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My user talk page has been vandalized countless times; I guess liberals are in denial and hate having to face their problems as much as any (other) addict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Subpages==&lt;br /&gt;
[[/devil]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==NPOV==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the most commonly violated principles of neutral editing at Wikipedia:&lt;br /&gt;
* It is inappropriate to remove blocks of well-referenced information which is germane to the subject from articles on the grounds that the information advances a point of view. Wikipedia's NPOV policy contemplates inclusion of all significant points of view.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wikipedia's neutral point-of-view (NPOV) policy contemplates inclusion of all significant points of view regarding any subject on which there is division of opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wikipedia articles should contain information regarding the subject of the article; they are not a platform for advocacy regarding one or another point of view regarding the topic. Sweeping generalizations which label the subject of an article as one thing or another are inappropriate and not a substitute for adequate research regarding details of actual positions and actions which can speak for themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
*Injection of personal viewpoints regarding the subject of an article is inappropriate and not to be resolved by debate among the editors of an article, but referenced from reputable outside resources. See [[Wikipedia:No original research]] and [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a soapbox|Wikipedia is not a soapbox]] or a vehicle for [[propaganda]] advocacy or [[advertising]].&lt;br /&gt;
*A strong point of view expressed elsewhere on a subject does not necessarily mean POV-pushing editing on Wikipedia; that can only be determined by the edits to Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
* Unexplained deletions of portions of controversial articles are unacceptable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am on probation at Wikipedia for trying to point out some of these problems and just might get my account blocked! :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use Google to search for ''Ed Poor probation'' &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=Ed+Poor+probation]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Qatar&amp;diff=2127461</id>
		<title>Qatar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Qatar&amp;diff=2127461"/>
		<updated>2025-05-21T15:05:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: the Qatar royal family agreed to provide the Pentagon with a new Boeing 747 to replace the president's aging official plane&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''دولة قطر&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Dawlat Qatar'' &lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Qatar rel95.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Qatar.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of Qatar.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Doha&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Constitutional monarchy&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Arabic&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=[[Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani]] (emir)&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Abdullah bin Nasser bin Khalifa Al Thani&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =4,416 sq mi 11,437 KM2&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =2,880,000 (2020)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =$180,000,000,000 (2020)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$62,500 (2020)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Riyal&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''State of Qatar''' is an Islamic [[emirate]] on the Arabian [[peninsula]] to the west of the [[Persian Gulf]], with a population of over 900,000, although one quarter of that population are foreign workers and their families.  The official language is [[Arabic]] and the capital is Doha. [[English]] is a commonly used second language. It was the host of the [[2022 FIFA World Cup]] (men's [[soccer]] championship).&lt;br /&gt;
In 2025, Qatar offered to provide a $400 million plane to replace [[Air Force One]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar is known as the main financial sponsor for many radical [[Islam]]ic groups like [[Al-Qaeda]] (including their affiliates AQAP and Al-Nusra)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://robertspencer.org/2019/12/us-defense-intelligence-agency-says-turkey-qatar-supported-al-qaedas-al-nusra-front&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://atalayar.com/en/content/qatar-accused-funding-al-qaedas-parent-organisation-syria&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.counterextremism.com/content/qatar-money-and-terror&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;,the [[Taliban]], [[Hamas]], and the [[Muslim Brotherhood]]. A high ranking Qatari alleged financier of [[911]] was Khalifa Mohammed, who is a U.S.-, EU-, and U.N.-designated international terrorist for his role in financing al-Qaeda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;In Qatar, there are three buckets: Terror financing by the government; terror financing done in Qatar through their own citizens that their government may not know about; and terror financing in Qatar that the government knows about but does nothing to stop.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=govinfo-2017&amp;gt;[https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-115hhrg26427/html/CHRG-115hhrg26427.htm ASSESSING THE U.S.-QATAR RELATIONSHIP - Govinfo.gov].&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font size=1&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[House Hearing, 115 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] ASSESSING THE U.S.-QATAR RELATIONSHIP &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JULY 26, 2017 &lt;br /&gt;
Serial No. 115-55 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar has been known to be a permissive environment for terror financing, reportedly funding U.S. designated foreign terrorist organizations, such as Hamas, as well as several extremist groups operating in Syria.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014, the former deputy director of CIA, David Cohen, called out Qatar publicly along with the Kuwaitis, because according to him, &amp;quot;The private engagement with these countries had not achieved what we were trying to achieve.'' In fact, Qatar has openly housed Hamas leaders, Taliban leaders, and has several individuals who have been sanctioned by our U.S. Treasury Department, and it has failed to prosecute them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least one high-ranking Qatari official provided support to the mastermind of the 9/11 terror attacks against our country, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then, of course, there is Khalifa Mohammed, who is a U.S.-, EU-, and U.N.-designated international terrorist for his role in financing al-Qaeda and the 9/11 mastermind. &lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, he was tried and convicted in absentia by Bahrain for his terrorist activity, and arrested later that year by Qatar only to be released by the Qataris 6 months later, and then openly financed by Doha. &lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone guess what Khalifa Mohammed has been up to these days? He was implicated in terror financing activities in 2012, but more recently, he has been alleged to be financing and supporting terror in both Iraq and Syria with no response from the Qatari Government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamas leader, Khaled Meshaal, also made Doha his headquarters for years while the Qatari's--with the Qatari's Government support and even the Muslim Brotherhood has received significant support from Qatar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, not all of this is supported by the government in Doha. Many individuals and charities in Qatar have been known to raise large sums of money for al-Qaeda, the Nusra front, Hamas, and even ISIS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Qatar, there are three buckets: Terror financing by the government; terror financing done in Qatar through their own citizens that their government may not know about; and terror financing in Qatar that the government knows about but does nothing to stop. According to the 2015 country reports on terrorism, the State Department stated, &amp;quot;Entities and individuals within Qatar continue to serve as a source of financial support for terrorists and violent extremist groups, particularly regional al-Qaeda affiliates such as the Nusra front.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no excuse for openly harboring terrorist and supporting groups that seek to harm our allies, and the excuse by Qatar that it is harboring these nefarious actors is because the U.S. asked them to no longer stands up. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar should not be continuing this reckless policy due to past mistakes from previous Republican and Democratic administrations. We must not allow for our air base to be used as a means to justify this sort of behavior, and a lack of a more appropriate response. Doha's behavior must change the status quo, and if it does not, it risks losing our cooperation on the air base. The truth of the matter is that none of the Gulf countries--none of the Gulf countries are without their issues. All of the nations have been involved in funding different groups at some point that we would not approve of. But it seems like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are making progress at a faster rate while Qatar is making some progress but still is lagging slowly behind. According to the Congressional Research Service, &amp;quot;In October 2016, Daniel Glaser, then Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing in the Office for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, told the Washington, DC, Research Institute that over the past decade, Qatar has made less progress in countering terrorism financing than had Saudi Arabia.'' We must analyze the totality of our relationship with these Gulf countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Qatar only helps to facilitate our operations at our air base, the UAE, for example, has spent 12 years with us fighting alongside in Afghanistan and has been involved in counterterrorism operations with the U.S. in Libya. So moving forward, one outcome that I hope comes out of this dispute is for the Gulf countries to work closely with our Treasury Department's Financial Action Task Force to root out and disrupt terror financing streams. This uneasy time may just be an opportunity for us to take a long hard look at how, and for some, if, we can effectively address and stop terror financing in the region, and ultimately defeat the extremism that threatens the security of us all. And with that, I turn to my friend, the ranking member, Mr. Deutch, for his statement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Deutch. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks to the witnesses for being back before our committee. I thank the chairman for convening today's timely hearing to explore our relationship with Qatar at a moment of great instability in the region. The ongoing diplomatic rift between Qatar and its Gulf neighbors is not good for the parties of the conflict; it is not good for the region; and it is not good for American interests. It is a distraction from today's most pressing challenges, Iran's destabilizing activities, the conflict in Syria, and the spread of terrorism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most Americans who expect conflict in the Middle East to fall along sectarian lines, or between competing regional hegemons, it is confusing to see Sunni Arab neighbors in conflict. But this is a dispute over longstanding grievances, over Qatar's support financially, and through its state-owned Al Jazeera news station, for actors and groups that Qatar's neighbors and, in many cases, the United States, see as deeply problematic. This feud, like others in the region, is a nuanced and deeply complex matter, and our relationship with Qatar is no less complex. A tiny but immensely wealthy nation pursues an ambitious foreign policy of close relations with all actors in the region. Unfortunately, this includes terror groups like Hamas and the Afghan Taliban. Qatar has served as a financial and political lifeline for Hamas' devastating rule in Gaza since the terror group took over more than a decade ago. Qatar has sent hundreds of millions of dollars into the Gaza strip, provides safe haven in Doha for Hamas leader, Khaled Meshaal, and helped legitimize Hamas rule in 2012 when the Emir became the first international leader to visit Hamas- led territory. Qatar has also supported other dangerous groups in the region, including sending advanced weaponry and financing to extremist elements in Syria and Libya, and Al Jazeera has given voice to clerics calling for suicide attacks against Americans and Israelis...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Schanzer, we will begin with you for your opening statement. STATEMENT OF JONATHAN SCHANZER, PH.D., SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES Mr. Schanzer. Madam Chairman, Ranking Member Deutch, and members of the subcommittee, on behalf of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, thank you for the opportunity to testify. As many of you know, FDD has been producing research and analysis on Qatar since the eruption of the Arab Spring in 2011. Our critique has been consistent. We have pointed to Qatari support for Hamas, the Taliban, jihadists in Syria, jihadists in Libya and the Muslim Brotherhood. We have been critical of Qatar for the invective broadcast on state-owned Al Jazeera. We have tracked the many reports suggesting that Qatar paid ransom to terrorism groups, and we have noted through the work of my colleague, David Andrew Weinberg, that Qatar has failed to take action against U.S. and U.N.-designated terrorist financiers. In my written testimony, I document these problems, and I am happy to discuss them further. But for a moment, I would like to address how Qatar has responded to the allegations against it...&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatari officials intimidated claimants in terror case. The claimants fled after their lives and homes were destroyed by al-Nusra Front jihadist organisation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/nov/11/high-court-hears-claims-qatar-officials-intimidated-terror-case-witnesses Qatari officials intimidated claimants in terror case, high court told], ''The Guardian'',  Nov 11, 2020.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; The claimants say they fled to Holland after their lives and homes were destroyed by al-Nusra Front, a jihadist organisation.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar is the owner of Anti-Semitic and Anti-American [[Al-Jazeera]] media network, and main supporter of many [[far-left]] media sites like [[The Young Turks network]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/02/12/report-youtube-to-fund-far-left-young-turks-journalism-academy/ Report: YouTube to Fund Far-Left Young Turks Journalism ‘Academy’]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Or .&amp;lt;ref name=wsj-2002&amp;gt;[https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1010012291811235280 Reporting Bias], ''WSJ'', Jan 2, 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=mim-2005&amp;gt;[https://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/914 Militant Islam Monitor - Al Qaeda tape 'given' to 'Al Jihadzeera' shows Bin Laden 'lieutenant' Al Zawahiri threatening attacks on UK and US], August 5, 2005.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Al Qaeda tape 'given' to 'Al Jihadzeera' shows Bin Laden 'lieutenant' Al Zawahiri threatening attacks on UK and US.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=mim-2014&amp;gt;[https://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/6284 Al Jihadzeera' Reporters Charged With Belonging To A Terrorist Group], Feb 1, 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Qatar (and its al Jazeera, middleeasteye) is the problem in radical Islam, not the solution.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.memri.org/countries/qatar Qatar]. ''Memri''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.counterextremism.com/content/muslim-brotherhood-qatar CounterExtremism. MB, Qatar].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.jns.org/qatars-day-after-plan-for-gaza-keep-hamas-in-power/ Qatar's 'day after' plan for Gaza: Keep Hamas in power]. ''JNS'', Jan 28, 2025.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.jns.org/qatar-is-now-the-deep-state-in-the-trump-administration/ Qatar is now the deep state in the Trump administration]. ''JNS''. Feb 12, 2025.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21386/qatar-is-hamas 'Qatar is Hamas, and Hamas is Qatar]'. By Khaled Abu Toameh. ''Gatestoneinstitute''. February 11, 2025.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; '''unfortunately, much in/of the West needs it to &amp;quot;mediate&amp;quot; as it hosts Hamas and holds 'keys' to radicals, all the while it, hypcortically, plays the two face game'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the tricks to use the [[2022 FIFA World Cup]], in its efforts to spread radical Islamism, among other things, it invited radical preacher Dr. Zakir Naik to teach FIFA fans about Islam.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://millichronicle.com/2022/11/qatar-invites-radical-preacher-dr-zakir-naik-to-teach-fifa-fans-about-islam.html Qatar invites radical preacher Dr. Zakir Naik to teach FIFA fans about Islam], Milli Chronicle,  Nov 19, 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Doha — Qatar has invited the radical preacher Dr. Zakir Naik, infamous for his endorsing views on suicide bombings, to teach the FIFA fans about Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
The famous ScreenMix entertainment magazine tweeted on Saturday, “Qatar invited the famous Islamic preacher Dr. Zakir Naik to deliver religious lectures during the 2022 World Cup.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-Taliban Urdu-Language daily revealed Qatar's plans to Invite FIFA World Cup attendees to Islam: 'Training of 2,000 volunteers for invitation of the religion at the mega event has been completed who will deliver the message of &amp;quot;truth&amp;quot;[sic] to the spectators.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/pro-taliban-urdu-language-daily-reveals-qatars-plans-invite-fifa-world-cup-attendees-islam Pro-Taliban Urdu-Language Daily Reveals Qatar's Plans To Invite FIFA World Cup Attendees To Islam: 'Training Of 2,000 Volunteers For Invitation Of The Religion At The Mega Event Has Been Completed Who Will Deliver The Message Of (so called) Truth(sic) To The Spectators'], ''Memri'', November 18, 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent article, the Pakistan-based Urdu-language pro-Taliban daily Roznama Ummat examined the Qatari government's preparations for da'wa (&amp;quot;preaching,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;invitation to Islam&amp;quot;) at the FIFA World Cup beginning on November 20, 2022. Da'wa is an important part of Islam whereby Muslims are expected to invite non-Muslims to embrace the religion.&lt;br /&gt;
The article, titled &amp;quot;FIFA World Cup And Da'wa Of The Religion,&amp;quot; and written by Islamic religious scholar Zia Chitrali, explains various media activities and events planned to explain Islam to non-Muslim spectators and to try to persuade them to convert. As part of these events planned by Qatari officials, thousands of volunteers will engage in da'wa and free books and pamphlets highlighting Islamic teachings will be distributed among the spectators.&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent article, the Pakistan-based Urdu-language pro-Taliban daily Roznama Ummat examined the Qatari government's preparations for da'wa (&amp;quot;preaching,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;invitation to Islam&amp;quot;) at the FIFA World Cup beginning on November 20, 2022. Da'wa is an important part of Islam whereby Muslims are expected to invite non-Muslims to embrace the religion.&lt;br /&gt;
The article, titled &amp;quot;FIFA World Cup And Da'wa Of The Religion,&amp;quot; and written by Islamic religious scholar Zia Chitrali, explains various media activities and events planned to explain Islam to non-Muslim spectators and to try to persuade them to convert.&lt;br /&gt;
As part of these events planned by Qatari officials, thousands of volunteers will engage in da'wa and free books and pamphlets highlighting Islamic teachings will be distributed among the spectators. [https://www.memri.org/sites/default/files/2022/11/sd10326.jpg].&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The West has turned a blind eye on its terrible human rights abuses.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=latimes-2017&amp;gt;Joshua S. Block&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-block-qatar-terrorism-syria-20170609-story.html Op-Ed: Qatar is a financier of terrorism. Why does the U.S. tolerate it?], ''LA Times'' Jun 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gulf Arabs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://amp.dw.com/en/how-are-gulf-countries-coming-to-terms-with-their-history-of-slavery/a-60686264 How are Gulf countries coming to terms with their history of slavery?], ''DW'', &lt;br /&gt;
08.02.2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Despite having officially outlawed slavery, Arab states in the Gulf region have downplayed the legacy of repression and racism faced by minorities...&lt;br /&gt;
Modern slavery is still widespread in the Arab states of the Gulf region, where millions of migrant workers are forced to work under grueling conditions with little or no pay.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; have been known to be practicing modern day slavery on the largest scales with racism and worse-than-just apartheid .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar's case came into public eye also for its use of migrants on horrific conditions to prepare for the ''2022 FIFA World Cup''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2016/03/qatar-world-cup-of-shame/ QATAR WORLD CUP OF SHAME], Amnesty, Mar 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Migrants building a state-of-the-art stadium for the 2022 football World Cup in Qatar are abused and exploited – while FIFA makes huge profits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell FIFA and its sponsors to act now to protect migrant workers in Qatar from abuse.&lt;br /&gt;
Migrants from Bangladesh, India and Nepal working on the refurbishment of the showcase Khalifa Stadium and landscaping the surrounding gardens and sporting facilities known as the “Aspire Zone” are being exploited. Some are being subjected to forced labour. They can’t change jobs, they can’t leave the country and they often wait months to get paid. Meanwhile, FIFA (football’s global governing body), its sponsors and the construction companies involved are set to make massive financial gains from the tournament. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MY LIFE HERE IS LIKE A PRISON. THE MANAGER SAID: ‘IF YOU WANT TO STAY IN QATAR BE QUIET AND KEEP WORKING.’&lt;br /&gt;
Deepak, metal worker on the Khalifa Stadium&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matt Sullivan, [https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/world-cup-built-on-modern-slavery-stadium-workers-blow-the-whistle-on-qatars-cover-up-of-migrant-deaths-1234627582/ A World Cup Built on Modern Slavery': Stadium Workers Blow the Whistle on Qatar’s ‘Coverup’ of Migrant Deaths and Suffering], ''Rolling Stone'', Nov 9, 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 — “This,” says Equidem executive director Mustafa Qadri, “is a World Cup built on modern slavery.” In a statement to Rolling Stone, a spokesperson..&lt;br /&gt;
Anish Adhikari awoke at the Qatari labor camp at 4 a.m. to diarrhea from last night’s rotten fish. His tonsils were swollen from the limited water made available by his employer while working 14 hours a day in 125-degree heat. But he remained hopeful that building air conditioners for 80,000 ticket-holders could provide the equivalent of $8,000 over three years to support his family in Nepal. That he could pay back the loan shark who’d secured Adhikari a job beginning in 2019 with the Hamad Bin Khalid Contracting Co. (HBK), the contracting firm owned by the the highest echelons of Qatar’s ruling Al Thani family. He thought of his father and sickly mother living with his six brothers, their four wives, and their eight children in a hurricane-ravaged farmhouse, using an animal shed for a kitchen. But the 23-year-old soccer fan was helping to construct the site of this year’s World Cup final; some days, when he arrived at Lusail Iconic Stadium before dawn, Adhikari forgot how exhausted he was.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The exact number of fatal victims of the 'Stadiums of Shame' will never be known &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sean Ingle, [https://www.theguardian.com/football/2022/nov/14/stadiums-of-shame-the-numbers-world-cup-hosts-qatar-dont-want-to-be-seen Stadiums of shame: the numbers World Cup hosts Qatar don’t want to be seen], ''The Guardian'', Mon 14 Nov 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;As the world’s media and teams start to arrive the facts and figures behind workers’ and human rights in Qatar remain hard to uncover.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in this Arab [[Islamic]] non-free regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2022 FIFA World Cup'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[FIFA]] Officials were bribed to award World Cups to Russia and Qatar,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/sports/soccer/qatar-and-russia-bribery-world-cup-fifa.amp.html U.S. Says FIFA Officials Were Bribed to Award World Cups to Russia and Qatar], ''The New York Times'', Apr 6, 2020.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
For nearly a decade, Russia and Qatar have been suspected of buying votes to win hosting rights for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. On Monday, for the first time, the Department of Justice put things in black and white.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=rb-18nov22&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2022/11/18/roger-bennett-amanpour-qatar-world-cup-controversy.cnn 'Sport is political,' says World Cup podcaster], ''CNN'', Nov 18, 2022. (Roger Bennett in interview).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and it has been surrounded by many controversies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ian Ward, [https://www.vox.com/world/23450515/world-cup-fifa-qatar-2022-controversy-scandals-explained The many, many controversies surrounding the 2022 World Cup, explained], ''Vox'', November 19, 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since FIFA awarded the 2022 World Cup to Qatar in 2010, the tournament has been ensnared in a tangled web of scandals.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Including modern day slavery, racist exploitation, thousands of migrants deaths,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.asianews.it/news-en/Over-6,500-migrant-workers-have-died-all-for-2022-soccer-world-cup-52440.html QATAR Over 6,500 migrant workers have died all for 2022 soccer world cup], Asia.it,  Feb 25, 2021&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; cruel limitaion of water drinking while working in the heat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/show/migrant-workers-recount-abuse-while-building-stadiums-for-world-cup-in-qatar Migrant workers recount abuse while building stadiums for World Cup in Qatar], ''PBS'', Nov 18, 2022&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt; The water we got was almost 90 percent ice. We asked why they did that and told them it was impossible to drink water like that....&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aimee Lewis, Pramod Acharya and Sugam Pokharel, [https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/11/17/football/qatar-2022-world-cup-migrant-workers-human-rights-spt-intl/index.html Our dreams never came true.' These men helped build Qatar's World Cup, now they are struggling to survive], ''CNN'', November 17, 2022.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Taliban]] invested heavily in the World Cup construction and the tournament was a golden duck. They were paid millions. The Taliban officials lucrative salaries tied to peace talks to buy and then subcontract heavy machinery for tournament infrastructure over the past decade, a source from the Taliban's Doha office revealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joe Wallen, [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/terror-and-security/how-taliban-helped-build-stadiums-qatar-world-cup/ How the Taliban helped build the stadiums for the Qatar World Cup], ''Daily Telegraph'', Nov 25, 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Exclusive: Construction firms allegedly paid ‘millions’ to buy and lease machinery from the Taliban for infrastructure, according to sources&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Taliban made millions from the World Cup by providing construction equipment to build stadiums in Qatar, The Telegraph understands.&lt;br /&gt;
Senior Taliban officials used lucrative salaries tied to peace talks to buy and then subcontract heavy machinery for tournament infrastructure over the past decade, a source from the Taliban's Doha office revealed.&lt;br /&gt;
A large contingent of the Taliban leadership lived in Doha, the capital of Qatar, from 2013 onward where they were engaged in long-running peace talks with the US and UN.&lt;br /&gt;
“The Taliban invested heavily in the World Cup construction and the tournament was a golden duck. They were paid millions,” claimed the source, who lived in Doha in the decade running up to the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
“Some Taliban members had between six and ten pieces of heavy machinery each in Doha and would earn up to £10,000 per machine per month.”&lt;br /&gt;
Two separate senior Taliban sources described how officials were given lucrative allowances to live in the country during the peace negotiations, which was then invested in heavy construction machinery.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar in cahoots with [[Iran]] stifle voices of dissent during World Cup, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.iranintl.com/en/202211254809 Qatar In Cahoots With Iran To Stifle Voices Of Dissent During World Cup], Iran Intl, 11/25/2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Iran’s soccer team blanked 10-man Wales Friday as World Cup host Qatar prevented Iranian fans from expressing their support for the ongoing protests in their the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iranian fans, who wanted to take flags other than the official one approved by the Islamic Republic to the Al Rayyan’s Ahmad bin Ali Stadium, were stopped by security officers. Many people were barred from carrying or waving Iran’s ancient flag with the Lion and Sun emblem or a simple three-color flag with the main motto of the current wave of protests – Woman, Life, Liberty.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And [[IRGC]] man said, Qatar is helping Iran silence dissidents in World Cup.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.iranintl.com/en/202211279876 IRGC Man Says Qatar Helping Iran Silence Dissidents In World Cup], IranIntl, Nov 27, 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Documents obtained by Iran International show Iran was coordinating secret efforts with Qatar to control who attends the World Cup and restrict any signs of dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Reward, a hactivist group that found access to Fars News Agency files this week provided an audio tape of a meeting between a Revolutionary Guard general and a group of media managers or representatives from outfits affiliated with the IRGC about plans to use the sporting event to the benefit of the regime in Tehran.&lt;br /&gt;
A six-minute audio segment of a tape features General Ghasem Ghoreyshi (Qasem Qoreyshi), deputy commander of the paramilitary Basij and a group of reporters including the one from Fars News who met with him possible in the presence of other trusted reporters to discuss the latest developments including plans for the World Cup.&lt;br /&gt;
The meeting took place on Tuesday 15th of November.&lt;br /&gt;
Ghoreyshi starts by saying that “anti-revolutionaries” have bought “5,330 tickets” to the tournament and adds that “our boys have checked the list of the ticket holders and at least 500 people” are known opponents of the Iranian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
This is the first piece of evidence of collaboration with Qatar, showing that Iran obtained the list of ticket buyers most probably from Qatari authorities.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Palestinian&amp;quot; flags were part of an orchestrated campaign pushed by &amp;quot;Palestine&amp;quot; activists, backed by Qataris, to make it look like &amp;quot;spontaneous.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pal Media Watch @palwatch&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/palwatch/status/1599792713469149184 Dec 5, 2022].&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although seemingly spontaneous, #FreePalestine flags at #WorldCup2022 are propaganda props organized by #Palestinian organizations. Palestinian activists hand out flags to be smuggled into the stadiums and be raised at the 48th minute each game.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of Arab racism's instances, the brutal attack on an Egyptian mistakenly believed he was Israeli. &lt;br /&gt;
The Qataris were embarrassed because their officials hadn't believed the poor Egyptian when he insisted he was one of them. And so, they stood by as the mob gave him the &amp;quot;Israeli treatment.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;C. Glick, [https://www.jns.org/opinion/cultural-appropriation-and-the-jews/ Cultural appropriation and the Jews], Dec 2, 2022.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;.. an Egyptian television reporter covering the World Cup tournament in Doha, Qatar was assaulted by an angry mob and forced to leave the games to avoid being lynched. The mob assaulted him because they mistook him for an Israeli reporter.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
German media exposed expressed Arab racism, (masked under supposed worry for &amp;quot;Palestinians&amp;quot;), backed by the gangs of &amp;quot;Qatari dynasty want to use to secure their power.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Martin Krauss, [https://taz.de/Orchestrierte-Israel-Feindschaft/!5897026 German media: Orchestrated hostility toward Israel: Morocco is not in Palestine], Taz, 2022-12-10.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font size=1&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You just have to like World Cup outsiders Morocco – don't you? Adding an anti-Semitic touch to the joy makes things difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palestine plays along: Morocco's team after reaching the quarter-finals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How could we not be happy that Morocco has one of the eight best football teams in the world ! Finally a team that doesn't come from Europe or South America! In addition - and now follows an interpretation that is surprisingly seldom read at present - a North African team that has gradually chased one colonial power after the other off the football field: Belgium in the preliminary round, Spain in the round of 16; now another nation is waiting with Portugal, which owes its wealth largely to its colonial past. Next, France and the Netherlands could be decolonized in terms of football.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of this, I think, obvious interpretation, the Moroccan success is overlaid with a lot of Palestine symbolism. The Moroccan team held up a Palestine flag after defeating Spain. Tunisian fans did something similar in the preliminary round. And some Qataris are now wearing a &amp;quot;pro-Palestine&amp;quot; armband in response to the Europeans' &amp;quot;One Love&amp;quot; armband, which they see as an impertinence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At first, that seems childishly defiant: ugh, we have our protest too! From a political point of view, however, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is used here to assert an alleged Arab unity. As if fans from Maghreb countries were in the same boat as the Qatari ruling families! In order to prevent protests, which could not least come from Palestinian migrant workers in Qatar, ruling families from the emirate and other regimes are building a bugbear called &amp;quot;Palestine Solidarity&amp;quot;. It is not without reason that Qatar has been financially supporting the terror that the Islamist Hamas is waging against Israel for years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a historical precedent for the transparent pro-Palestine propaganda that so characterizes the World Cup. In 1963, a counter-Olympics were held in Jakarta. Ganefo called it &amp;quot;Games of the New Emerging Forces&amp;quot;. What was supposed to look like a sympathetic rebellion from the then so-called Third World countries was the project of the Indonesian President Sukarno. It was explicitly directed against Israel's participation in world sport.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-racism is still necessary, it can be expressed, for example, in joy at Moroccan soccer successes. But giving that joy an anti-Semitic touch is the twist that gangs like the Qatari dynasty want to use to secure their power.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Encouraging Jihadi massacres'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the racist-Arab Islamic-fascistic butcher's [[2023 Sabbath Jerusalem Synagogue Massacre]],  Al-Jazeera presenters, Journalists In Qatari Press, Qatar-Backed Muslim Clerics: Terrorist Attack: &amp;quot;'brave act' of 'legitimate resistance [sic],' its  perpetrator is a 'hero.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/al-jazeera-presenters-journalists-qatari-press-qatar-backed-muslim-clerics-terrorist-attack Al-Jazeera Presenters, Journalists In Qatari Press, Qatar-Backed Muslim Clerics: Terrorist Attack Near Jerusalem Synagogue Was 'Brave Act' Of 'Legitimate Resistance,' Its Perpetrator Is A 'Hero'] ''Memri'', February 1, 2023.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Lobbying US'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feb 2024 report: Hamas patron Qatar has been lobbying the U.S. Government, given over $5,600,000,000 to US universities since 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adam Kredo, [https://freebeacon.com/national-security/hamas-patron-qatar-has-spent-6-billion-lobbying-the-u-s-government-and-funding-universities/ Hamas Patron Qatar Has Spent $6 Billion Lobbying the U.S. Government and Funding Universities] ''Washington Free Beacon'', Feb 9, 2024.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar, the oil-rich Middle Eastern nation that provides shelter and cash to the Hamas terror group’s top leaders, has spent nearly $6 billion since 2007 lobbying the American government and funneling cash to the United States’ top universities, funding that is generating scrutiny in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
With Qatar emerging as a central mediator in the United States’ attempts to reach a hostage deal between Israel and Hamas, Doha’s decades-long influence peddling operation in America is raising concerns about the country’s ties to the Iran-backed terror group.&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar has given or contracted more than $5.6 billion to 61 American schools since 2007, including Ivy Leagues such as Harvard University, Yale University, Cornell University, and Stanford University, according to funding records reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon. The country has also doled out more than $243 million on lobbying efforts in the United States since 2015, with more than $16 million spent in 2023 alone.&lt;br /&gt;
The money, experts and lawmakers say, has enabled Qatar to have outsized influence in American politics and academia, efforts they say have mainstreamed anti-Israel propaganda and silenced criticism about Doha’s longstanding ties to Hamas, the Iranian regime, and other terror groups. Hamas’s “three top leaders alone are worth a staggering total of $11 billion and enjoy a life of luxury in the sanctuary of the emirate of Qatar,” according to the New York Post.&lt;br /&gt;
The vast funding operation has generated congressional interest in the past and is fueling calls for an investigation by members of the Republican Study Committee (RSC), Congress’s largest GOP caucus, according to lawmakers and senior GOP aides who spoke to the Free Beacon. The RSC, one senior staffer said, is currently pressuring the relevant House oversight committees to investigate Qatar’s lobbying efforts and funding to schools….&lt;br /&gt;
From November 2007 to October 2023, Qatar made 1,116 donations to American universities totaling $5,673,091,815, records show. This has led to accusations that Doha is using its influence with the country’s top schools to mainstream propaganda that portrays Israel in a negative light.&lt;br /&gt;
Through the Qatar Foundation, a state-controlled entity tasked with promoting the country’s interests, the nation has prioritized educational initiatives that employ anti-Israel materials, according to watchdog groups…&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity came about with&lt;br /&gt;
anti-Israel swastika-palestine&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eric Rozenman, [https://www.washingtonjewishweek.com/keffiyeh-as-neo-swastika-fashion-statement/ Keffiyeh as Neo-Swastika Fashion Statement], Washington Jewish Week'', Apr 10, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henry Kopel, [https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/how-the-keffiyeh-became-the-21st-centurys-swastika/ How the Keffiyeh Became the 21st Century’s Swastika], ''TOI'', May 19, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/389117 Man arrested at pro-Palestinian Arab protest in London for carrying swastika placard], ''INN'', Apr 28, 2024.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Two men arrested at Palestine Solidarity Campaign demonstration in the British capital to call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alana Goodman, [https://freebeacon.com/campus/northwestern-jewish-students-recount-scary-and-shocking-campus-anti-semitism-in-meetings-with-lawmakers/ Northwestern Jewish Students Recount 'Scary and Shocking' Campus Anti-Semitism in Meetings With Lawmakers], ''Free Beacon'', May 2, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/diaspora-affairs/artc-israeli-student-at-john-hopkins-assaulted-after-speaking-about-hostages Israeli student at John Hopkins assaulted after speaking about hostages], ''i24 news'', May 2, 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;attacker shouted derogatory remarks at her, including demands for her to &amp;quot;go back to Europe,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxla.com/news/usc-swastika-fencepost-usc-palestine-protest Swastika found drawn on USC campus fence post], ''FOX 11 Digital Team'' May 1, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Campus &amp;quot;protests&amp;quot; mobs on campus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2025 it was revealed, &amp;quot;Qatari Defense Minister in past tweets: 'We Are all Hamas'; 'We must plan how to influence the decision-makers in the U.S.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/qatari-defense-minister-past-tweets-we-are-all-hamas-we-must-plan-how-influence-decision Qatari Defense Minister In Past Tweets: 'We Are All Hamas'; 'We Must Plan How To Influence The Decision-Makers In The U.S.']. ''MEMRI'',  March 27, 2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Terrorist-State Propaganda'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an elaborated piece in Aug 2024, in ''Commentary''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.commentary.org/seth-mandel/how-terrorist-state-propaganda-became-the-norm-for-u-s-audiences/ How Terrorist-State Propaganda Became the Norm for U.S. Audiences].&lt;br /&gt;
by Seth Mandel. August 8, 2024.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'How Terrorist-State Propaganda Became the Norm for U.S. Audiences.&lt;br /&gt;
It would be unfair to say that all the employees of Al Jazeera who have thus far been investigated for terrorist ties have turned out to be members of Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Some are with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, after all.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As it was rightfully said: &amp;quot;Hold Qatar responsible for Al Jazeera’s Terrorist-Journalists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://mosaicmagazine.com/picks/politics-current-affairs/2024/06/hold-qatar-responsible-for-al-jazeeras-terrorist-journalists/ Hold Qatar responsible for Al Jazeera’s Terrorist-Journalists]. ''Mosaic'', &lt;br /&gt;
June 26 2024.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And: &amp;quot;All eyes should be on Al Jazeera for being founded, funded — and directed — by terrorists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://nypost.com/2024/06/20/opinion/all-eyes-should-be-on-al-jazeera-for-being-founded-funded-and-directed-by-terrorists/ All eyes should be on Al Jazeera for being founded, funded — and directed — by terrorists]. Douglas Murray. ''NYPost''. June 20, 2024.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Wide pro genocidal Hamas support'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 2025 report: Qatari journalists and figures close to Qatar lionize Hamas founder sheikh Ahmad Yassin: &amp;quot;he blazed the path of jihad; the processions of martyrs will not stop until palestine is liberated.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/qatari-journalists-and-figures-close-qatar-lionize-hamas-founder-sheikh-ahmad-yassin-he Qatari Journalists And Figures Close To Qatar Lionize Hamas Founder Sheikh Ahmad Yassin: He Blazed The Path Of Jihad; The Processions Of Martyrs Will Not Stop Until Palestine Is Liberated]. ''MEMRI''. Apr 1, 2025.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==People== &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qatar people.jpg|right|230px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Natives of the Arabian Peninsula, many Qataris are descended from a number of migratory tribes that came to Qatar in the 18th century from the neighboring areas of Nejd and Al-Hasa. Some came from neighboring Gulf emirates and others are descended from Persian merchants. Most of Qatar's 907,229 inhabitants live in Doha, the capital. Foreigners with temporary residence status make up about three-fourths of the population. Foreign workers comprise 52% of the total population and make up about 89% of the total labor force. Most are South and Southeast Asians, Egyptians, &amp;quot;Palestinians&amp;quot;, Jordanians, and Iranians. About 8,000 U.S. citizens reside in Qatar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ethnic groups: Arab 40%, Pakistani 18%, Indian 18%, Iranian 10%, other 14%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The various ethnic groups of the country are Arab, Indian, Pakistani, Iranian and so on. Arabic is the official language of Qatar. However, English and Urdu are also spoken widely in various corners of the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mapsofworld.com/country-profile/qatar-economy-people-culture-and-flag.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For centuries, the main sources of wealth were pearling, fishing, and trade. At one time, Qataris owned nearly one-third of the Persian Gulf fishing fleet. With the [[Great Depression]] and the introduction of [[Japan]]'s cultured-pearl industry, pearling in Qatar declined drastically. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Qataris are mainly Sunni Muslims.  [[Salafi]] Islam is the official religion, and Islamic jurisprudence is the basis of Qatar's legal system, although civil courts have jurisdiction over commercial law. Education is compulsory and free for all Arab residents 6–16 years old. Qatar has an increasingly high literacy rate. 85% of the people are educated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Muslim agenda of the Obama administration}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Doha Palace in Qatar.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Doha Palace.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The ruling Al Thani family continued to hold power following the declaration of independence in 1971. The head of state is the Amir, and the right to rule Qatar is passed on within the Al Thani family. Politically, Qatar is evolving from a traditional society to one based on more formal and democratic institutions to meet the requirements of social and economic progress. The country's constitution formalizes the hereditary rule of the Al Thani family, but it also establishes an elected legislative body and makes government ministers accountable to the legislature. In current practice, the Amir's role is influenced by continuing traditions of consultation, rule by consensus, and the citizen's right to appeal personally to the Amir. The Amir, while directly accountable to no one, cannot violate the Shari'a (Islamic law) and, in practice, must consider the opinions of leading families and the religious establishment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The opinions of the people are institutionalized in the Advisory Council, an appointed body that assists the Amir in formulating policy. However, it is possible that the first elections for this body will occured in 2008. Elections in 1999, in which both men and women participated, resulted in the formation of a municipal council. One woman candidate was elected to the municipal council in 2003.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?load=detay&amp;amp;link=142359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Municipal elections were held for the third time in April 2007. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has been no serious challenge to Al Thani rule. As the most visible sign of the move toward openness, the Al Jazeera satellite television station based in Qatar is considered the most free and unfettered broadcast source in the Arab world. In practice, however, Al Jazeera rarely criticizes the ruling Al Thani family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani, one of the richest man in the world, is the ruling Emir of the State of Qatar since 1995. He rose to that position on June 26, 1995, after deposing his father Khalifa bin Hamad Al Thani who was on vacation in Switzerland at the time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nationmaster.com/country/qa-qatar/dem-democracy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present there is not direct election in the electoral system. Since 1992, Sheikh Hamad has selected Qatar's cabinet as in an absolute monarchy. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani with Obamas.jpg|thumb|300px|Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani and wife with Obamas.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2011, ''[[USAToday]]'' quoted Obama:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|President Obama met with the emir of Qatar, praising his help in Libya and his leadership &amp;quot;when it comes to democracy in the Middle East.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That night, Obama provided political donors in Chicago with a somewhat different view of the emir and Qatar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Pretty influential guy,&amp;quot; Obama said of Emir Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, noting that he basically owns the Al Jazeera television network. &amp;quot;He is a big booster, big promoter of democracy all throughout the Middle East. Reform, reform, reform -- you're seeing it on Al Jazeera.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Obama: &amp;quot;Now, he himself is not reforming significantly. There's no big move towards democracy in Qatar.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/04/obama-no-big-move-toward-democracy-in-qatar/1 ''Obama: &amp;quot;No big move toward democracy in Qatar&amp;quot;''].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Days later an editorial in the Doha daily newspaper ''The Peninsula'' responded:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;Mr. President, we have often written about U.S. foreign policy having double standards and being unmindful of the process of change in the Middle East. We do not want U.S. to export democracy to us because we do not want to repeat the Iraq experience.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2011/04/19/Editorial-Qatar-passes-on-US-democracy/UPI-80331303219157/#ixzz1KXWgdFv3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government Officials===&lt;br /&gt;
*Amir, Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, and Minister of Defense—HH Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani&lt;br /&gt;
*Heir Apparent, Deputy Chief of the Armed Forces—HH Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani&lt;br /&gt;
*Prime Minister—Abdullah bin Nasser bin Khalifa Al Thani&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Energy and Industry and Deputy Prime Minister—Abdullah al-Attiyah &lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the U.S.--vacant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foreign Relations==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:White-House-Qatar-Muslim-Brotherhood.jpg|right|300px|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar achieved full independence in an atmosphere of cooperation with the U.K. and friendship with neighboring states. Most Arab states, the U.K., and the U.S. were among the first countries to recognize Qatar, and the state promptly gained admittance to the United Nations and the Arab League. Qatar established diplomatic relations with the U.S.S.R. and China in 1988. It was an early member of [[OPEC]] and a founding member of the GCC. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 1992, tensions arose with Saudi Arabia when Saudi forces allegedly attacked a Qatari border post, resulting in two deaths. Relations have since improved, and a joint commission has been set up to demarcate the border as agreed between the two governments. Most, but not all, of the border issues have been resolved. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For years, both Qatar and Bahrain claimed ownership of the Hawar Islands. The case was eventually referred to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague. The ICJ issued a ruling in June 2001, which both sides accepted. In the agreement Bahrain kept the main Hawar Island but dropped claims to parts of mainland Qatar, while Qatar retained significant maritime areas and their resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar is aligned in ideological purpose with the [[Muslim Brotherhood]] – the political umbrella organization of authentic Islam (Taliban, al-Qaeda, ISIS, etc).  The Qatari government previously assisted the U.S. State Department with covert weapons distribution during the Obama/Clinton era.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://shoebat.com/2014/08/01/turkey-qatar-state-sponsors-terrorism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;On July 25, 2012 a US Chinook helicopter was shot down by the Taliban in Afghanistan by the latest generation of the Stinger available for export. A serial number from the missile casing was recovered, tracing the Stinger's origin to a lot entrusted to the [[CIA]] which was delivered to Qatar. Under Obama's covert action finding the Stinger was intended for Libya and Syrian jihadis. Hillary Clinton's State Dept. and [[John Brennan]]'s CIA jointly ran the covert weapons supply program, http://nypost.com/2014/06/08/how-the-taliban-got-their-hands-on-modern-us-missiles/ leaving the Pentagon and Gen.[[Michael Flynn]]'s [[Defense Intelligence Agency]] out of the loop.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Qatar is aligned with the geopolitical interests of the [[Peoples Republic of China]] including the [[Belt and Road Initiative]] for broad global communist Chinese influence.  Qatar, is ideologically aligned with extremist Islam and naturally aligned with Turkey and Pakistan.  Qatar was the host to many [[Gitmo]] detainees that were removed from U.S. custody.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/qatars-prot%C3%A9g%C3%A9s-%E2%80%93-hamas-officials-muslim-brotherhood-al-jazeera-reporters-%E2%80%93-praise-talibans Qatar's Protégés – Hamas Officials, Muslim Brotherhood, Al-Jazeera Reporters – Praise Taliban's 'Jihad' And 'Victory'; Journalists, Liberals In Response: They Should Move To Kabul], ''Memri'', August 19, 2021&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Qatar is where the leadership of the Taliban came from, when they returned to Afghanistan in 2021 to take control of advanced weapon technology abandoned by U.S. [[Democrat]] socialist leader [[Joe Biden]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2021/08/18/left-behind-billions-in-u-s-equipment-for-the-afghanistan-taliban-to-use-against-us-n1470346&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Libyan and Syrian wars and the Islamic State===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Arab Spring|Obama war crimes}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hillary Clinton email scandal|Hillary Clinton's emails]] boast of [[Hillary Clinton]] engaging with [[UAE]], Qatar, and [[Jordan]] between March 18–30, 2011 to seek their participation in coalition operations. Over the course of several days, all three devote aircraft to the mission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[Muammar Gaddafi]] shut down Libya's Internet system in early March,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://goodtimesweb.org/surveillance/wsj-libya-spies-firms-aug-30-2011.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Qatar had given the rebel jihadis access to its satellites.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2011/10/28/sen-mccains-libyan-two-step/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A week after Gaddafi's murder, Qatar took credit for sending hundreds of troops into Libya to provide training, communications and strategy. Qatar &amp;quot;acted as the link between the rebels and [[Nato]] forces.&amp;quot; ''Guardian'' adds,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/oct/26/qatar-troops-libya-rebels-support&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Some, however, express concern at the emirate's support for [[Islamist]] elements such as the 17 February Martyrs Brigade, one of the most influential rebel formations, led by Abdel-Hakim Belhaj.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 6, 2012 the ''New York Times'' confirmed &lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|&amp;quot;Qataris provided weapons, money and training to various rebel groups in Libya [destined for Syria]. One militia that received aid was controlled by [Abdelhakim Belhadj], then leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, who was held by the C.I.A. in 2004...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/africa/weapons-sent-to-libyan-rebels-with-us-approval-fell-into-islamist-hands.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 3, 2013 an arms flight was reported from Qatar to Istanbul destined for [[Islamic State]] rebels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On May 16 the ''Financial Times'' reported Qatar had spent $3 billion over the past two years bankrolling the jihadi rebels in Syria.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aid to the Islamic State and the Benghazi massacre===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Benghazi massacre}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NYT - Arms Pipeline to the Syrian Rebels.png|right|300px|thumb|CIA pipeline of arms from Qatar to groups in Turkey which became the Islamic State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://fair.org/home/down-the-memory-hole-nyt-erases-cias-efforts-to-overthrow-syrias-government/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Illustration: New York Times'']]&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2012, President [[Barack Obama]] signed a Presidential Finding authorizing transfer of captured weapons from [[Libya]] to groups that became the Islamic State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mark Hosenball, [https://web.archive.org/web/20170216061621/https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/01/obama-secret-syria-order_n_1730712.html?tw_p=twt Obama Secret Syria Order Authorizes Support For Rebels], ''Reuters'' via ''HuffPost'', &lt;br /&gt;
08/01/2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Reuters]]'' reported &lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|under provisions of the presidential finding, the United States was collaborating with a secret command center operated by Turkey and its allies.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last week, Reuters reported that, along with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Turkey had '''established a secret base near the Syrian border to help direct vital military and communications support to Assad’s opponents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This “nerve center” is in Adana, a city in southern Turkey about 60 miles (100 km) from the Syrian border, which is also home to Incirlik, a U.S. air base where U.S. military and intelligence agencies maintain a substantial presence.'''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turkey’s moderate Islamist government has been demanding Assad’s departure with growing vehemence. Turkish authorities are said by current and former U.S. government officials to be increasingly involved in providing Syrian rebels with training and possibly equipment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
European government sources said wealthy families in Saudi Arabia and Qatar were providing significant financing to the rebels. Senior officials of the Saudi and Qatari governments have publicly called for Assad’s departure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[[The Guardian]]'' reported,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|these were not average members of the Free Syrian Army. Abu Khuder and his men fight for [[al-Qaida]]. They call themselves the ghuraba’a, or “strangers”, after a famous jihadi poem celebrating Osama bin Laden’s time with his followers in the Afghan mountains, and they are one of a number of jihadi organisations establishing a foothold in the east of the country now that the conflict in Syria has stretched well into its second bloody year.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They try to hide their presence. “Some people are worried about carrying the [black] flags” ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...[they] are working closely with the military council that commands the Free Syrian Army brigades in the region. “We meet almost every day,” he said. “We have clear instructions from our [al-Qaida] leadership that if the FSA need our help we should give it. We help them with IEDs and car bombs. Our main talent is in the bombing operations” ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“The FSA lacks the ability to plan and lacks military experience. That is what [al-Qaida] can bring. ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“In the beginning there were very few. Now, mashallah, there are immigrants joining us and bringing their experience,” he told the gathered people. “Men from [[Yemen]], Saudi, Iraq and Jordan...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“[Al-Qaida’s] goal is establishing an Islamic state and not a Syrian state,” he replied. “Those who fear the organisation fear the implementation of Allah’s jurisdiction... https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jul/30/al-qaida-rebels-battle-syria}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Amb. [[Christopher Stevens]] was put in charge of the covert operation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/africa/weapons-sent-to-libyan-rebels-with-us-approval-fell-into-islamist-hands.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The aim was to arm jihadist groups which then transformed themselves into the [[Islamic State of Iraq and Syria]] with the goal of overthrowing [[Bashar al Assad]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/world/middleeast/arms-airlift-to-syrian-rebels-expands-with-cia-aid.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''[[New York Times]]'' reported [[David Petraeus]] had been instrumental in helping to get an aviation network moving to supply ISIS rebels and prodded various countries to work together on it. Three Royal Jordanian Air Force [[C-130]]s landed in Esenboga, Turkey in a hint at what would become a stepped-up Jordanian and Saudi role.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;“Within three weeks, two other Jordanian cargo planes began making a round-trip run between Amman, the capital of Jordan, and [[Zagreb]], the capital of [[Croatia]], where, officials from several countries said, the aircraft were picking up a large Saudi purchase of infantry arms from a Croatian-controlled stockpile.&amp;quot; Two Jordanian Ilyushins bearing the logo of the Jordanian International Air Cargo firm but flying under Jordanian military call signs made a combined 36 round-trip flights between [[Amman]] and Croatia from December 2012 through February 2013. The same two planes made five flights between Amman and Turkey in January 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;As the Jordanian flights were under way, the Qatari flights continued and the Royal Saudi Air Force began a busy schedule, too — making at least 30 C-130 flights into Esenboga from mid-February 2013 to early March 2013, according to flight data provided by a regional air traffic control official.”  American officials have confirmed that senior [[White House]] officials were regularly briefed on the shipments.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/RQHyy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Edward Snowden]] leaked details of a program that trained approximately 10,000 jihadi fighters at a cost of $1 billion a year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://fair.org/home/down-the-memory-hole-nyt-erases-cias-efforts-to-overthrow-syrias-government/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2021 Gaza War===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Guardian of Walls}}&lt;br /&gt;
The building demolished by the [[Israeli Defense Forces]] housed anti-Israel [[Al Jazeera]] which is owned by Qatar, a supporter of Hamas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Spencer S. Hsu: &amp;quot;Lawsuits by U.S. victims accuse top Qatar banks and charity of financing terrorism in Israel.&amp;quot; Washington Post, Dec. 15, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/lawsuits-by-us-victims-accuse-top-qatar-banks-and-charity-of-financing-terrorism-in-israel/2020/12/15/4ebea7fe-244a-11eb-a688-5298ad5d580a_story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the ceasefire in May/2021, Al Jazeera was applauded in Gaza rally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2021/05/24/watch-gazans-applaud-al-jazeera-correspondent-during-hamas-victory-celebrations/ WATCH: Gazans Applaud Al-Jazeera Correspondent During Hamas ‘Victory’ Celebrations] Joshua Klein, May 24, 2021&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2023/4 Gaza jihad war===&lt;br /&gt;
Weeks after the [[Shield and arrow]] op.  , ''against the backdrop of the latest round of fighting between Israel and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in Gaza, Palestinian journalist Samir Al-Barghouti, a columnist for the Qatari daily Al-Watan, called on the Palestinians of all factions to carry out terror attacks throughout Israel, from the north to the south, in order to inflict blows on the Israelis and terrify them.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/article-qatari-daily-incites-palestinians-carry-out-terror-attacks-throughout-israel Article In Qatari Daily Incites Palestinians To Carry Out Terror Attacks Throughout Israel], ''Memri'', May 22, 2023.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Against the backdrop of the latest round of fighting between Israel and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in Gaza, Palestinian journalist Samir Al-Barghouti, a columnist for the Qatari daily Al-Watan, called on the Palestinians of all factions to carry out terror attacks throughout Israel, from the north to the south, in order to inflict blows on the Israelis and terrify them. He also urged the Arab countries to open up the fronts against Israel and expel the Israeli ambassadors from their territory, lest it become too late for them to repent. &amp;quot;The historical and religious promise regarding Palestine will soon be realized,&amp;quot; he stated, and therefore it is necessary to keep up the attacks on Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that Al-Barghouti often calls for armed struggle against Israel. In fact, only two months ago he published a similar article inciting to besiege, pursue and attack the Israelis in Tel Aviv and in every part of Palestine, from the river to the sea.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exposing Qatar: The truth behind its global influence. Digital marketing expert began countering anti-Israel narratives after [[October 7 War|October 7]], launching a viral Hamas-ISIS campaign; she exposed misinformation, highlighting Qatar’s influence as both Western cultural investor and sponsor of terror.&lt;br /&gt;
She witnessed a wave of misinformation on social media, with prominent accounts denying the atrocities or circulating videos of hostages. She launched a viral campaign aimed at exposing Qatar’s dual role as a cultural and financial influencer in the West and as a sponsor of groups like Hamas. &amp;quot;They are invested in billions in education in the West from the age of 6 until the end of university when people are 22. They're the biggest donors to elite Ivy League universities in the U.S., and they demand to control what is being taught and who is the staff that teaches that. Apart from that, they're purchasing cultural assets of the West,&amp;quot; she said.&lt;br /&gt;
She accused Qatar of using its wealth to silence criticism of its support for organizations such as Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and even ISIS. &amp;quot;In the Israeli case, when we look at their efforts to mediate between Hamas and Israel regarding the hostage deal. This is not a mediator that says, 'there are two sides and I'm here to mitigate between them.' This is a country that puts on its buildings the flags of Palestine, Hamas, Sinwar and Haniyeh on a weekly basis and portrays them as heroes. They're also the owners of Al Jazeera, whose Arabic, English and its version to Gen Z on social media, AJ+, are inciting against Israel,&amp;quot; she added, citing Qatar’s funding of international institutions like the International Court of Justice.'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sharon Kidon, [https://www.ynetnews.com/culture/article/r1f26r6rke Exposing Qatar: The truth behind its global influence]. ''Ynet'', Dec 28, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2023: Al Jazeera inciting, in service of Qatar, Hamas, MB===&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2023, the [[Palestinian Authority]] claimed that Al Jazeera is inciting Arabs against them &amp;quot;in service of Qatar, Hamas, [[Muslim Brotherhood]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/palestinian-authority-al-jazeera-incites-against-us-service-qatar-hamas-muslim-brotherhood Palestinian Authority: Al-Jazeera Incites Against Us In Service Of Qatar, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood; We Will Consider Taking Legal Measures Against It; Al-Jazeera In Response: Our Coverage Is Balanced And Professional], ''Memri'', July 11, 2023&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Swords of Iron]]===&lt;br /&gt;
Report raises questions about Qatar’s knowledge of Oct. 7 atrocities.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Western intelligence officials interviewed by Politico in recent weeks say that Qatar, a longtime patron of Hamas in Gaza, may have had prior knowledge of the Oct. 7 attack on Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We’re still looking into it,” a top intelligence official from a major European country told the U.S. news site when asked if Doha had advanced information about the mass assault. The source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of the issue, added that there was “smoke,” but no smoking gun.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.jns.org/report-raises-questions-about-qatars-knowledge-of-oct-7-attack/ Report raises questions about Qatar’s knowledge of Oct. 7 attack.&lt;br /&gt;
Doha had a lot to gain from the Hamas assault on southern Israel, Western intelligence officers say], ''JNS'', Jan 11, 2024.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hamas-Al-Jazeera-Qatar ties exposed===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Oct 2024, &amp;quot;following the exposure of the involvement of six Al Jazeera correspondents who took part in Hamas’s terrorist activities, the IDF spokesperson in Arabic, Col. Avichay Adraee, revealed a series of documents that point to the depth of the close cooperation between Hamas and the Qatari channel, including Hamas’s directive to prevent any mention of criticism of the terrorist organization, through covering up failed rocket launches, and even the establishment of a secure communication line between Hamas and Al Jazeera.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ohad Merlin, [https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-826206 Hamas-Al-Jazeera-Qatar ties exposed in new IDF documents, online eulogies]. ''The Jerusalem Post'', Oct 26, 2024.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
New documents formulated by Hamas reveal the depth of Al Jazeera's cooperation with the terrorist group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the exposure of the involvement of six Al Jazeera correspondents who took part in Hamas’s terrorist activities, the IDF spokesperson in Arabic, Col. Avichay Adraee, revealed a series of documents that point to the depth of the close cooperation between Hamas and the Qatari channel, including Hamas’s directive to prevent any mention of criticism of the terrorist organization, through covering up failed rocket launches, and even the establishment of a secure communication line between Hamas and Al Jazeera.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Taliban takeover August-2021===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Fall of Kabul}}&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2021, Qatar's managed Al-Jazeera celebrated the [[Taliban]] take over as a fanatical-religious win for the entire Islamic nation. The Ummah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/al-jazeera-reporters-celebrate-taliban-victory-us-defeat-historic-triumph-islamic-ummah Al-Jazeera Reporters Celebrate 'Taliban Victory', 'U.S. Defeat' As Historic Triumph For Islamic Ummah], Memri, August 18, 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar | Special Dispatch No. 9503&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban's takeover of the country sparked many reactions worldwide, including in the Arab world. Conspicuous among these reactions were expressions of joy by Islamist organizations such as Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad,the International Union of Muslim Scholars and various elements identified with the Muslim Brotherhood.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It joined other Islamic infamous group such as Islamist organizations such as [[Hamas]], the [[Palestinian Islamic Jihad]]. As Qatar is aligned in ideological purpose with the [[Muslim Brotherhood]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unsurprisingly, Al-Jazeera channel received from Taliban exclusive access to the presidential palace in Kabul.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;roi kais (@kaisos1987) Tweeted:&lt;br /&gt;
The Qatari Al-Jazeera channel receives from Taliban exclusive access to the presidential palace in Kabul.  No need to be surprised  https://t.co/h53JupS8OP [https://twitter.com/kaisos1987/status/1426974071145877507?s=20 Aug 15, 2021]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, ond of the big gainers at [[Taliban]]'s rise is  the &amp;quot;tiny Qatar&amp;quot;, capable of disproportionate intervention in their affairs not hers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ilan Zalayat @ilanzalayat Tweeted:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
While everyone is talking about the effects of the turbulent upheaval in Afghanistan on neighbors like China or Iran, it is becoming clear that one of the big gainers is actually the tiny Qatar capable of disproportionate intervention in their affairs not hers.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://mobile.twitter.com/ilanzalayat/status/1428345434016256003 Aug 19, 2021]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The French magazine Charlie Hebdo publicized a cartoon exposing Qatar's hypocrisy: On the one hand, there is the transfer of Messi to Paris Saint-Germain&lt;br /&gt;
And on the other hand host and fund the Taliban. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For Qatar lovers and interested people,&lt;br /&gt;
French 'Charlie Hebdo'&lt;br /&gt;
On the hypocrisy and Qatari bipolarity&lt;br /&gt;
On the one hand, there is the transfer of Messi to Paris Saint-Germain&lt;br /&gt;
And on the other hand it hosts and funds the Taliban.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/oritperlov/status/1429773962871984130 Aug 23, 2021] (It reads &amp;quot;It's worse than what we thought&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Immediately after the Kabul airport suicide bombing killing 170, and the withdrawal of American troops, the Taliban requested assistance from Qatar to run the airport.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/08/27/taliban-ask-qatar-for-technical-assistance-running-kabul-airport/ Taliban Ask Qatar For Technical Assistance Running Kabul Airport], Conservative Tree House, Aug 27, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CCP United Front Work Department===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|United Front Work Department}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Brookings Institution]] Doha Center, the [[think tank]]’s hub in Qatar, signed a memorandum of understanding with the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences in January 2018.  The partnership piqued the FBI's interest about potential [[Chinese Communist Party]] (CCP) espionage activities at the think tank, which employed nearly two dozen [[foreign policy]] advisers to the [[Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/national-security/brookings-institution-partnered-with-shanghai-policy-center-under-scrutiny-for-spying/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Clinton Foundation===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Clinton Foundation]] accepted multimillion-dollar donations from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, two Gulf Arab states that also financed the Islamic State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264493/saudi-arabia-and-qatar-bankroll-isis-%E2%80%94-and-clinton-joseph-klein Saudi Arabia and Qatar bankroll ISIS -- and the Clinton Foundation],&amp;quot; ''Frontpage Mag''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Marc Bennett===&lt;br /&gt;
The 'Jamal Khashoggi vs. Marc Bennett'  exposed iberal hypocrisy,  criminal Qatar / Islamist supremacy on non-Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Khashoggi passion play coincides with information about Qatar’s murder of Marc Bennett, a British citizen who was brutally tortured without a word of protest from the West.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Daniel Greenfield]], [https://www.frontpagemag.com/jamal-khashoggi-vs-marc-bennett-whose-life-matters/ Jamal Khashoggi vs. Marc Bennett: Whose Life Matters?], FPM, Oct 5, 2022 .&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=1&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One British man’s death in Qatar reveals the dirty truth about the traitors within.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an annual propaganda ritual, the heads of foreign governments and media operatives marked the anniversary of Jamal Khashoggi’s death by tweeting condemnations of the killing of the old friend of Osama bin Laden who had been recruited by an Al Qaeda financier to promote Jihad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a testament to the unchallenged power of the Islamic tyranny of Qatar that everyone in Washington D.C. unquestioningly takes a knee and pays tribute to its martyred operative.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Jamal Khashoggi’s murder 4 years ago was also an attack on freedom of expression everywhere,” Secretary of State Blinken tweeted. There’s no such thing as “freedom of expression” among Khashoggi’s Qatari employees. Khashoggi was not fighting for any kind of freedom, but for an Islamist tyranny of the kind practiced by Qatar’s fellow Islamists in Iran. Had he gotten his way, liberals in Saudi Arabia would be the ones being brutally murdered.&lt;br /&gt;
As they are in Iran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Western elites have spent far less time expressing outrage about the torture and mass murder by Iran’s Islamic regime of thousands of dissidents and protesters than they have over the death of an Islamist whose death equally outraged Al Qaeda and ISIS as it did Washington D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Washington Post was much less exercised about one of its own reporters, Jason Rezaian, being held hostage in Iran for over a year than over Jamal Khashoggi, a foreign operative running press releases from the Qatari Foundation in its digital pages at the behest of Qatar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This year the annual Khashoggi passion play coincides with information about Qatar’s murder of Marc Bennett, a British citizen who was brutally tortured without a word of protest from the West.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Blinken has expressed a word of concern about Bennett’s killing by Khashoggi’s backers, I have yet to find it. The British government closed the case and has shown no interest. The Washington Post has never allowed Bennett’s name to appear in its pages. That might offend its Qatari masters. Despite having been killed a year after Khashoggi, there is still virtually no mention of Bennett by the politicians, influencers and media operatives who claim that they only care about the Qatari terrorist agenda because they are so deeply moved by human rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike Khashoggi’s death, Bennett’s death was not political. He was just one of the many foreign workers whom Qatar’s slave masters considered their personal property. When Bennett tried to leave Qatar Airlines, he was treated like any of the other foreign workers, mostly Indian, Asian and African, who are routinely beaten, tortured and worked to death in the Islamic tyranny.&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between the thousands of foreign workers who have died to erect the glittering towers of Doha, who prepare for the World Cup, and who attend to the needs of the slave masters of Qatar, is that Bennett was a westerner. But to the Islamic slave masters of Qatar and others in the region, all non-Arabs and non-Muslims are inferior subhuman slaves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the most recent report in The London Times, “Bennett had been taken blindfolded and handcuffed to a state security detention centre. Bennett later described how he was stripped naked, blasted with high-pressure hoses, slammed against walls.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His alleged crime was trying to leave Qatar Airways which, like most of the major organizations, including Al Jazeera, is controlled by Qatar’s ruling family.  According to the Qataris, Bennett later “committed suicide” in a hotel room in Doha on Christmas Day. The timing must have amused his Islamist killers. According to his wife, his clothes had been laid in his hotel room as if he were preparing to go out and the circumstances of the crime scene don’t comport with those of a suicide. British investigators noted, “no specific evidence of suicidal intent”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British government has issued multiple statements about Khashoggi’s death even though the Bin Laden pal was never a British citizen or related to the UK in any meaningful way. It has shrugged at Bennett’s death and then gotten on with the business of asking Qatar for cash.&lt;br /&gt;
The BBC has one mention of Bennett. It has hundreds of results for Khashoggi.&lt;br /&gt;
Last year, the British government declared that it continues to raise the “terrible crime” of Khashoggi’s death with Saudi Arabia. No such efforts have been made to raise the death of Marc Bennett, a Briton who was not an associate of Islamic terrorists or an enemy agent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The relative silence over Bennett’s death and the hysterical fury over Khashoggi’s demise reveal more than a double standard, but the deep level of political control Qatar wields over the West.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Westerners don’t need to be physically within the boundaries of Qatar, for the Islamic terror state to have almost as much control over their lives as it did over that of Marc Bennett.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oil-glutted Islamic terrorist state has not only escaped the consequences for its crimes, but it sets the political agenda for Washington D.C. and much of the western world. Between Al Jazeera, which sets the media’s agenda for the region, and Brookings, the powerful Democrat think tank whose associates fill the ranks of the Biden administration, Qatar rules over us.&lt;br /&gt;
The Muslim Brotherhood, which Qatar backs, continues to enjoy safe harbor in America. Its various affiliates have not only been immunized from prosecution, but have been deeply embedded in our government, our political system and our culture. To understand not only our failure to stop Islamic terrorism after 9/11, but the disastrous surrender to the Taliban, overseen by Qatar, which played godfather to the Taliban talks, you have to recognize its influence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khashoggi’s omnipresence in our culture and Bennett’s nonexistence is a testimony of the far darker truths about how our governments have sold us out to be killed by Islamic terrorists and their state sponsors while blasting us with propaganda that turns the terrorists into victims.&lt;br /&gt;
“We were hoping to establish an Islamic state anywhere,” Khashoggi reminisced about his time together with Osama bin Laden in the Muslim Brotherhood. “We believed that the first one would lead to another, and that would have a domino effect which could reverse the history of mankind.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find that Islamic state in Washington D.C. now where everyone from Tim Kaine to Mitt Romney pushes Khashoggi propaganda. Lindsay Graham tried to hold up a bill for Osama bin Laden’s old pal. Bernie Sanders attacked Biden for not holding gas prices in this country hostage to the Qatari agent. While our political class may differ on so many issues, when it comes to what Qatar wants, they are all in agreement. And they are all betraying us.&lt;br /&gt;
Khashoggi’s death was indeed revealing. And what it revealed is that our countries are rotten with politicians and media outlets who willingly serve as the tools of an Islamic terrorist state.&lt;br /&gt;
That is why they won’t talk about Bennett’s death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the Cold War, when a Communist ran into trouble anywhere, human rights organizations, journalists and politicians would rush to his defense in the name of humanity. But when countless people were tortured, starved and killed in Communist prisons, they were silent.&lt;br /&gt;
What was true of the USSR is still true of China and of Qatar.&lt;br /&gt;
Every time you hear about Jamal Khashoggi, you are seeing Qatar’s influence at work and you are witnessing traitors out themselves. Listen carefully. And remember Bennett’s Qatar,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khashoggi was an agent of the foreign Islamist powers that rule over us. Bennett is us.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Unlike Khashoggi’s death, Bennett’s death was not political. He was just one of the many foreign workers whom Qatar’s slave masters considered their personal property. When Bennett tried to leave Qatar Airlines, he was treated like any of the other foreign workers, mostly Indian, Asian and African, who are routinely beaten, tortured and worked to death in the Islamic tyranny.&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between the thousands of foreign workers who have died to erect the glittering towers of Doha, who prepare for the World Cup, and who attend to the needs of the slave masters of Qatar, is that Bennett was a westerner. But to the Islamic slave masters of Qatar and others in the region, all non-Arabs and non-Muslims are inferior subhuman slaves.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Training [[Hamas]] terrorists===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2024, Qatar’s regime became under fire for training Hamas terrorists: 'Qatar is Hamas and Hamas is Qatar'.Qatar – which is known for supporting Hamas, financing its military activity and sheltering its leaders, and for extending media support to Hamas by means of its Al-Jazeera channel – also trained, in its Police College in Al-Rayyan, officers from Hamas' Interior and National Security Ministry, which is part of Hamas' governing authorities in the Gaza Strip Given the sensitivity, especially regarding the hostages, neither the IDF nor the Foreign Ministry were willing to comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar has lashed out at American Jews and Congressional representatives who demonstrated in front of their Washington embassy calling for Doha to pressure Hamas to release the hostages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Benjamin Weinthal, [https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-788543 Qatar’s regime under fire for training Hamas terrorists: 'Qatar is Hamas and Hamas is Qatar'], ''JPost'',  February 23, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Trump Administration===&lt;br /&gt;
On a May 2025 visit to Qatar, U.S. President [[Donald Trump]] brought four American billionaires with him, resulting in $2 trillion in trade deals.&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, the Qatar royal family agreed to provide the Pentagon with a new Boeing 747 to replace the president's aging official plane ([[Air Force One]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Apartheid and racism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arab [[Apartheid]], such as anti Asian racism, is rampant in Qatar.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://amp.theguardian.com/cities/2018/oct/09/the-qatari-mall-without-qataris-you-cant-ignore-the-racial-undertones-doha Asian Town, Qatar's mall for migrants: 'You can't ignore the racial undertones'], Pete Pattisson and Naveen Nair in Doha, The Guardian, Oct 9, 2018.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The new Asian Town mall was designed to cater to Qatar’s roughly 2 million migrant workers – but critics say it is simply a way to segregate them... The Gulf countries take deliberate measures to dissuade migrants bringing their families with them, and then justify the ghettos and zoning regulations under the pretext of security,” Saraswathi said. “Time and again, Asian male migrants are kept away because they are ‘bachelors’, while the same wouldn’t apply to western or Arab single men. One can’t ignore the racial undertones.”&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And Qatar can't explain the thousands of deaths in a decade.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pete Pattisson, &amp;quot;[https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/aug/26/qatar-has-failed-to-explain-up-to-70-of-migrant-worker-deaths-in-past-10-years-amnesty Qatar has failed to explain up to 70% of migrant worker deaths in past 10 years – Amnesty],&amp;quot; The Guardian , Aug 26, 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
World Cup host has not properly investigated fatalities, rights group says, citing concerns over heat stress and safety&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
World Cup host Qatar has failed to investigate the deaths of thousands of migrant workers in the past decade, according to a new report by Amnesty International.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human rights organisation said the majority of migrant worker deaths in Qatar are attributed to “natural causes”, cardiac or respiratory failure; classifications which are “meaningless” without the underlying cause of death explained, according to one expert cited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, as many as 70% of deaths may be unexplained. “In a well resourced health system, it should be possible to identify the exact cause of death in all but 1% of cases,” the report said.... In February the Guardian revealed that more than 6,500 migrant workers from south Asia had died in Qatar in the past decade...&lt;br /&gt;
In February the Guardian revealed that more than 6,500 migrant workers from south Asia had died in Qatar in the past decade.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Bigotry / genocidal==&lt;br /&gt;
In a classic example. When in Jan 2020, in a historic visit by the Secretary General of the Islamic World League, Dr. Muhammad al-Issa, to the Auschwitz extermination camp in Poland, led by a delegation of 25 senior Muslim clerics, a few days before International Holocaust Remembrance Day - it had support for it in Saudi Arabia, but it was condemned in Qatar.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.memri.org.il/cgi-webaxy/item?5172 Historic visit of the head of the Islamic World League to the Auschwitz camp - support for in Saudi Arabia, condemnations in Qatar], Memri, 3/2/2020.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 23, the visit of the Secretary General of the Islamic World League, Dr. Muhammad al-Issa, to the Auschwitz extermination camp in Poland, led by a delegation of 25 senior Muslim clerics, a few days before International Holocaust Remembrance Day, was a historic precedent for his first visit.  A senior Muslim delegation in an extermination camp commemorating the Holocaust of the Jews of Europe.  Thus, and following al-Issa's statements during the visit in condemnation of the Holocaust, the visit provoked many different reactions in the Arab and Islamic world...&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apr 22, 2024: One of Qatar's representatives speaking at Arab League: “[[Oct 7 War|October 7th]] is only the beginning. We will eliminate all the Jews”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Visegrád 24 @visegrad24 ([https://twitter.com/visegrad24/status/1782821718022586749 Apr 23, 2024]):&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Islamic regime in Iran isn’t the only problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar is also highly problematic to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we have one of their representatives speaking at an Arab League yesterday:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“October 7th is only the beginning. We will eliminate all the Jews”.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kosher🎗🧡 · Apr 23, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
@KosherCockney&lt;br /&gt;
Replying to @KosherCockney ([https://twitter.com/KosherCockney/status/1782898725976678764 Apr 23, 2024]):&lt;br /&gt;
I also forgot about Al Jazeera. They own that too who have spread lies and blood libels since the start, had a journalist participate in Oct7th, have plenty of “journalists” in Gaza who report the most outrageous lies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yeah Qatar is pure evil when you had that to the other…&lt;br /&gt;
Kosher🎗🧡 @KosherCockney:&lt;br /&gt;
Hi guys I have a version with subtitles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He actually says “The Al-Aqsa operation is only the prelude to the elimination of the Jews”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yeah fu_ck this guy and fu_ck Qatar.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Military==&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar's defense expenditures are estimated to be in the range of 10% of GDP. Qatar maintains a military force of about 12,000 men, including an army, navy, and air force. The country has a public security force of about 8,000 men, including a coast guard, national firefighting force, air wing, marine police, and an internal security force. Qatar also has signed defense pacts with the U.S., U.K., and France. Qatar plays an active role in the collective defense efforts of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC—the regional organization of the Arab states in the Gulf; the other five members are Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, the U.A.E., and Oman). Qatari forces played an important role in the first Gulf War, and Qatar has supported U.S. military operations critical to the success of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom.  Al Udeid, one of America's largest Air Force bases, remains a critical asset to operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael R. Gordon With Eric Schmitt, [https://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/28/world/aftereffects-bases-us-will-move-air-operations-to-qatar-base.html?sec=&amp;amp;spon=&amp;amp;pagewanted=1 AFTEREFFECTS: BASES; U.S. Will Move Air Operations To Qatar Base], ''The New York Times'', &lt;br /&gt;
April 28, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Qatar hosts CENTCOM Forward Headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
Oil formed the cornerstone of Qatar's economy well into the 1990s and still accounts for about 62% of total government revenue. In 1973, oil production and revenues increased sizably, moving Qatar out of the rank of the world's poorest countries and providing it with one of the highest per capita incomes. In 2006, Qatar's per capita income of nearly $62,000 was the fifth-highest in the world. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Industrial Gas Oil Qatar.jpg|right|300px|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar's economy suffered a downturn from in the mid-1990s. Lower Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) oil production quotas, a fall in oil prices, and the generally unpromising outlook on international markets reduced oil earnings. In turn, the Qatari Government cut spending plans to match lower income. The resulting recessionary local business climate caused many firms to lay off expatriate staff. With the economy recovering in the late 1990s, expatriate populations have grown again. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oil production is currently around 835,000 barrels a day (bpd), and is expected to reach 1.1 million bpd by 2009. At the current production pace, oil reserves are expected to last more than 40 years. Moreover, Qatar's proven reserves of gas are the third-largest in the world, exceeding 900 trillion cubic feet (14% of the world's total proven gas reserves). Qatar shares with Iran the largest single non-associated gas field in the world, the North Field. Qatar is now the world's largest producer of liquefied natural gas (LNG), with a capacity of more than 31 million metric tons per annum (mmta), and it expects to reach 77.5 mmta of LNG exports by 2010. By 2010, Qatar will account for one-third of the world's LNG supply. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1991 completion of the $1.5-billion Phase I of the North Field gas development project strongly boosted the economy. In 1996, Qatar began exporting liquefied natural gas to Japan. Further phases of North Field gas development costing billions of dollars are in various stages of planning and development, and Qatar has concluded agreements with the U.A.E. to export gas via pipelines and to Spain, Turkey, Italy, the U.S., France, South Korea, India, China, Taiwan, and the U.K. via ship. However, the government has halted any further expansion of gas production until 2010, as it assesses its plans for future exploitation of the field. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar's natural gas liquefaction facilities and related industries are located in Ras Laffan Industrial City, site of the world's largest LNG exports of more than 31 million metric tons per year. Qatar's heavy industrial base, located in Messaieed, includes a refinery with a 140,000 bpd capacity, a fertilizer plant for urea and ammonia, a steel plant, and a petrochemical plant, and several new petrochemical plants will be built in the coming years. All these industries use gas for fuel. Most are joint ventures between U.S., European, and Japanese firms and the state-owned Qatar Petroleum (QP). The U.S. is the major equipment supplier for Qatar's oil and gas industry, and U.S. companies are playing a major role in the development of the oil and gas sector and petrochemicals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The country's economic growth has been stunning. Qatar's nominal GDP, currently around $52.7 billion, has grown an average of 15% over the past five years. GDP is expected to grow approximately 8.3% in 2007. Qatar's per capita GDP is more than $60,000, and projected to soon be the highest in the world. The Qatari Government's strategy is to utilize its wealth to generate more wealth by diversifying the economic base of the country beyond hydrocarbons. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar pursues a vigorous program of &amp;quot;Qatarization,&amp;quot; under which all joint venture industries and government departments strive to move Qatari nationals into positions of greater authority. Growing numbers of foreign-educated Qataris, including many educated in the U.S., are returning home to assume key positions formerly occupied by expatriates. In order to control the influx of expatriate workers, Qatar has tightened the administration of its foreign manpower programs over the past several years. Security is the principal basis for Qatar's strict entry and immigration rules and regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
For 2011, despite the global financial crisis, Qatar has maintained its economic growth of the last several years. Qatari authorities throughout the crisis sought to protect the local banking sector with direct investments into domestic banks. GDP rebounded in 2010 largely due to the increase in oil prices. Economic policy is focused on developing Qatar's nonassociated natural gas reserves and increasing private and foreign investment in non-energy sectors, but oil and gas still account for more than 50% of GDP, roughly 85% of export earnings, and 70% of government revenues. Oil and gas have made Qatar the second highest per-capita income country - following Liechtenstein - and the world's second fastest growing - following Macau. Proved oil reserves of 15 billion barrels should enable continued output at current levels for 37 years. Qatar's proved reserves of natural gas exceed 25 trillion cubic meters, about 14% of the world total and third largest in the world. Qatar's successful 2022 world cup bid will likely accelerate large-scale infrastructure projects such as Qatar's metro system and the Qatar-Bahrain causeway. GDP - per capita:&lt;br /&gt;
$145,300 (2010 est.); Country comparison to the world: 1; GDP (official exchange rate): $126.5 billion (2009 est.). Agriculture - products: fruits, vegetables; poultry, dairy products, beef; fish; Industries: liquefied natural gas, crude oil production and refining, ammonia, fertilizers, petrochemicals, steel reinforcing bars, cement, commercial ship repair. Oil - proved reserves:&lt;br /&gt;
25.41 billion bbl (1 January 2010 est.) country comparison to the world: 12   &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theodora.com/wfbcurrent/qatar/qatar_economy.html Qatar Economy 2011, CIA World Factbook.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Map of Qatar Persia Arabia.jpg|thumb|300px|Map of Persia - Arabia, with the adjacent countries, 1855, (detail).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar has been inhabited for millennia. The Al Khalifa family of Bahrain dominated the area until 1868 when, at the request of Qatari nobles, the British negotiated the termination of the Bahraini claim, except for the payment of tribute. The tribute ended when the Ottoman Empire occupied Qatar in 1872. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the Ottomans left at the beginning of World War I, the British recognized Sheikh Abdullah bin Jassim Al Thani as ruler. The Al Thani family had lived in Qatar for 200 years. The 1916 treaty between the United Kingdom and Sheikh Abdullah was similar to those entered into by the British with other Gulf principalities. Under it, the ruler agreed not to dispose of any of his territory except to the U.K. and not to enter into relationships with any other foreign government without British consent. In return, the British promised to protect Qatar from all aggression by sea and to lend their good offices in case of a land attack. A 1934 treaty granted more extensive British protection. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1935, a 75-year oil concession was granted to the Qatar Petroleum Company, a subsidiary of the Iraq Petroleum Company, which was owned by Anglo-Dutch, French, and U.S. interests. High-quality oil was discovered in 1940 at Dukhan, on the western side of the Qatari peninsula. However, the start of WWII delayed exploitation of Qatar's oil resources, and oil exports did not begin until 1949. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Doha Mosque Qatar.jpg|thumb|left|280px|Doha Mosque.]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the 1950s and 1960s gradually increasing oil revenues brought prosperity, rapid immigration, substantial social progress, and the beginnings of Qatar's modern history. When the U.K. announced a policy in 1968 (reaffirmed in March 1971) of ending the treaty relationships with the Gulf sheikdoms, Qatar joined the other eight states then under British protection (the seven trucial sheikdoms—the present United Arab Emirates—and Bahrain) in a plan to form a union of Arab emirates. By mid-1971, as the termination date of the British treaty relationship (end of 1971) approached, the nine still had not agreed on terms of union. Accordingly, Qatar declared independence as a separate entity and became the fully independent State of Qatar on September 3, 1971. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 1972, the Heir Apparent, Sheikh Khalifa bin Hamad, deposed his cousin, Amir Ahmad, and assumed power. Key members of the Al Thani family supported this move, which took place without violence or signs of political unrest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 27, 1995, the Deputy Amir, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa, deposed his father Amir Khalifa in a bloodless coup. An unsuccessful counter-coup was staged in 1996. The Amir and his father are now reconciled, though some supporters of the counter-coup remain in prison. The Amir announced his intention for Qatar to move toward democracy and has permitted a freer and more open press and municipal elections as a precursor to expected parliamentary elections. Qatari citizens approved a new constitution via public referendum in April 2003, which came into force in June 2005. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1996 [[Al Jazeera]] launches the first independent Arab satellite news channel, breaking the monopoly of state controlled media in the region and in 2006 Qatar becomes the world's largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and acts as the first Arab host of the Asian Games. [http://www.qatartourism.gov.qa/discover/index/1/207]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.qatartourism.gov.qa/ Qatar tourism.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/qa.html Qatar.] CIA - The World Factbook.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dohaluxury.com/category/qatar-doha-living/ Doha living.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://qatarise.blogspot.com/ Qatar Wakeup Call.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Asian Countries}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Copyright Details (US Government)}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Middle Eastern Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Muslim-Majority Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Qatar&amp;diff=2127457</id>
		<title>Qatar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Qatar&amp;diff=2127457"/>
		<updated>2025-05-21T14:49:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: $400 million plane&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''دولة قطر&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Dawlat Qatar'' &lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =Qatar rel95.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag of Qatar.png&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of Qatar.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Doha&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Constitutional monarchy&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Arabic&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=[[Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani]] (emir)&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Abdullah bin Nasser bin Khalifa Al Thani&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =4,416 sq mi 11,437 KM2&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =2,880,000 (2020)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =$180,000,000,000 (2020)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=2005&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$62,500 (2020)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Riyal&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''State of Qatar''' is an Islamic [[emirate]] on the Arabian [[peninsula]] to the west of the [[Persian Gulf]], with a population of over 900,000, although one quarter of that population are foreign workers and their families.  The official language is [[Arabic]] and the capital is Doha. [[English]] is a commonly used second language. It was the host of the [[2022 FIFA World Cup]] (men's [[soccer]] championship).&lt;br /&gt;
In 2025, Qatar offered to provide a $400 million plane to replace [[Air Force One]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar is known as the main financial sponsor for many radical [[Islam]]ic groups like [[Al-Qaeda]] (including their affiliates AQAP and Al-Nusra)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://robertspencer.org/2019/12/us-defense-intelligence-agency-says-turkey-qatar-supported-al-qaedas-al-nusra-front&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://atalayar.com/en/content/qatar-accused-funding-al-qaedas-parent-organisation-syria&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.counterextremism.com/content/qatar-money-and-terror&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;,the [[Taliban]], [[Hamas]], and the [[Muslim Brotherhood]]. A high ranking Qatari alleged financier of [[911]] was Khalifa Mohammed, who is a U.S.-, EU-, and U.N.-designated international terrorist for his role in financing al-Qaeda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;In Qatar, there are three buckets: Terror financing by the government; terror financing done in Qatar through their own citizens that their government may not know about; and terror financing in Qatar that the government knows about but does nothing to stop.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=govinfo-2017&amp;gt;[https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-115hhrg26427/html/CHRG-115hhrg26427.htm ASSESSING THE U.S.-QATAR RELATIONSHIP - Govinfo.gov].&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font size=1&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[House Hearing, 115 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] ASSESSING THE U.S.-QATAR RELATIONSHIP &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
JULY 26, 2017 &lt;br /&gt;
Serial No. 115-55 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar has been known to be a permissive environment for terror financing, reportedly funding U.S. designated foreign terrorist organizations, such as Hamas, as well as several extremist groups operating in Syria.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014, the former deputy director of CIA, David Cohen, called out Qatar publicly along with the Kuwaitis, because according to him, &amp;quot;The private engagement with these countries had not achieved what we were trying to achieve.'' In fact, Qatar has openly housed Hamas leaders, Taliban leaders, and has several individuals who have been sanctioned by our U.S. Treasury Department, and it has failed to prosecute them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least one high-ranking Qatari official provided support to the mastermind of the 9/11 terror attacks against our country, Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then, of course, there is Khalifa Mohammed, who is a U.S.-, EU-, and U.N.-designated international terrorist for his role in financing al-Qaeda and the 9/11 mastermind. &lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, he was tried and convicted in absentia by Bahrain for his terrorist activity, and arrested later that year by Qatar only to be released by the Qataris 6 months later, and then openly financed by Doha. &lt;br /&gt;
Can anyone guess what Khalifa Mohammed has been up to these days? He was implicated in terror financing activities in 2012, but more recently, he has been alleged to be financing and supporting terror in both Iraq and Syria with no response from the Qatari Government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hamas leader, Khaled Meshaal, also made Doha his headquarters for years while the Qatari's--with the Qatari's Government support and even the Muslim Brotherhood has received significant support from Qatar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, not all of this is supported by the government in Doha. Many individuals and charities in Qatar have been known to raise large sums of money for al-Qaeda, the Nusra front, Hamas, and even ISIS. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Qatar, there are three buckets: Terror financing by the government; terror financing done in Qatar through their own citizens that their government may not know about; and terror financing in Qatar that the government knows about but does nothing to stop. According to the 2015 country reports on terrorism, the State Department stated, &amp;quot;Entities and individuals within Qatar continue to serve as a source of financial support for terrorists and violent extremist groups, particularly regional al-Qaeda affiliates such as the Nusra front.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no excuse for openly harboring terrorist and supporting groups that seek to harm our allies, and the excuse by Qatar that it is harboring these nefarious actors is because the U.S. asked them to no longer stands up. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar should not be continuing this reckless policy due to past mistakes from previous Republican and Democratic administrations. We must not allow for our air base to be used as a means to justify this sort of behavior, and a lack of a more appropriate response. Doha's behavior must change the status quo, and if it does not, it risks losing our cooperation on the air base. The truth of the matter is that none of the Gulf countries--none of the Gulf countries are without their issues. All of the nations have been involved in funding different groups at some point that we would not approve of. But it seems like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are making progress at a faster rate while Qatar is making some progress but still is lagging slowly behind. According to the Congressional Research Service, &amp;quot;In October 2016, Daniel Glaser, then Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing in the Office for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, told the Washington, DC, Research Institute that over the past decade, Qatar has made less progress in countering terrorism financing than had Saudi Arabia.'' We must analyze the totality of our relationship with these Gulf countries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Qatar only helps to facilitate our operations at our air base, the UAE, for example, has spent 12 years with us fighting alongside in Afghanistan and has been involved in counterterrorism operations with the U.S. in Libya. So moving forward, one outcome that I hope comes out of this dispute is for the Gulf countries to work closely with our Treasury Department's Financial Action Task Force to root out and disrupt terror financing streams. This uneasy time may just be an opportunity for us to take a long hard look at how, and for some, if, we can effectively address and stop terror financing in the region, and ultimately defeat the extremism that threatens the security of us all. And with that, I turn to my friend, the ranking member, Mr. Deutch, for his statement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Deutch. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks to the witnesses for being back before our committee. I thank the chairman for convening today's timely hearing to explore our relationship with Qatar at a moment of great instability in the region. The ongoing diplomatic rift between Qatar and its Gulf neighbors is not good for the parties of the conflict; it is not good for the region; and it is not good for American interests. It is a distraction from today's most pressing challenges, Iran's destabilizing activities, the conflict in Syria, and the spread of terrorism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most Americans who expect conflict in the Middle East to fall along sectarian lines, or between competing regional hegemons, it is confusing to see Sunni Arab neighbors in conflict. But this is a dispute over longstanding grievances, over Qatar's support financially, and through its state-owned Al Jazeera news station, for actors and groups that Qatar's neighbors and, in many cases, the United States, see as deeply problematic. This feud, like others in the region, is a nuanced and deeply complex matter, and our relationship with Qatar is no less complex. A tiny but immensely wealthy nation pursues an ambitious foreign policy of close relations with all actors in the region. Unfortunately, this includes terror groups like Hamas and the Afghan Taliban. Qatar has served as a financial and political lifeline for Hamas' devastating rule in Gaza since the terror group took over more than a decade ago. Qatar has sent hundreds of millions of dollars into the Gaza strip, provides safe haven in Doha for Hamas leader, Khaled Meshaal, and helped legitimize Hamas rule in 2012 when the Emir became the first international leader to visit Hamas- led territory. Qatar has also supported other dangerous groups in the region, including sending advanced weaponry and financing to extremist elements in Syria and Libya, and Al Jazeera has given voice to clerics calling for suicide attacks against Americans and Israelis...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Schanzer, we will begin with you for your opening statement. STATEMENT OF JONATHAN SCHANZER, PH.D., SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, FOUNDATION FOR DEFENSE OF DEMOCRACIES Mr. Schanzer. Madam Chairman, Ranking Member Deutch, and members of the subcommittee, on behalf of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, thank you for the opportunity to testify. As many of you know, FDD has been producing research and analysis on Qatar since the eruption of the Arab Spring in 2011. Our critique has been consistent. We have pointed to Qatari support for Hamas, the Taliban, jihadists in Syria, jihadists in Libya and the Muslim Brotherhood. We have been critical of Qatar for the invective broadcast on state-owned Al Jazeera. We have tracked the many reports suggesting that Qatar paid ransom to terrorism groups, and we have noted through the work of my colleague, David Andrew Weinberg, that Qatar has failed to take action against U.S. and U.N.-designated terrorist financiers. In my written testimony, I document these problems, and I am happy to discuss them further. But for a moment, I would like to address how Qatar has responded to the allegations against it...&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatari officials intimidated claimants in terror case. The claimants fled after their lives and homes were destroyed by al-Nusra Front jihadist organisation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/nov/11/high-court-hears-claims-qatar-officials-intimidated-terror-case-witnesses Qatari officials intimidated claimants in terror case, high court told], ''The Guardian'',  Nov 11, 2020.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; The claimants say they fled to Holland after their lives and homes were destroyed by al-Nusra Front, a jihadist organisation.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar is the owner of Anti-Semitic and Anti-American [[Al-Jazeera]] media network, and main supporter of many [[far-left]] media sites like [[The Young Turks network]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/02/12/report-youtube-to-fund-far-left-young-turks-journalism-academy/ Report: YouTube to Fund Far-Left Young Turks Journalism ‘Academy’]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Or .&amp;lt;ref name=wsj-2002&amp;gt;[https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB1010012291811235280 Reporting Bias], ''WSJ'', Jan 2, 2002.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=mim-2005&amp;gt;[https://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/914 Militant Islam Monitor - Al Qaeda tape 'given' to 'Al Jihadzeera' shows Bin Laden 'lieutenant' Al Zawahiri threatening attacks on UK and US], August 5, 2005.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Al Qaeda tape 'given' to 'Al Jihadzeera' shows Bin Laden 'lieutenant' Al Zawahiri threatening attacks on UK and US.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=mim-2014&amp;gt;[https://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/6284 Al Jihadzeera' Reporters Charged With Belonging To A Terrorist Group], Feb 1, 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Qatar (and its al Jazeera, middleeasteye) is the problem in radical Islam, not the solution.'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.memri.org/countries/qatar Qatar]. ''Memri''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.counterextremism.com/content/muslim-brotherhood-qatar CounterExtremism. MB, Qatar].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.jns.org/qatars-day-after-plan-for-gaza-keep-hamas-in-power/ Qatar's 'day after' plan for Gaza: Keep Hamas in power]. ''JNS'', Jan 28, 2025.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.jns.org/qatar-is-now-the-deep-state-in-the-trump-administration/ Qatar is now the deep state in the Trump administration]. ''JNS''. Feb 12, 2025.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21386/qatar-is-hamas 'Qatar is Hamas, and Hamas is Qatar]'. By Khaled Abu Toameh. ''Gatestoneinstitute''. February 11, 2025.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; '''unfortunately, much in/of the West needs it to &amp;quot;mediate&amp;quot; as it hosts Hamas and holds 'keys' to radicals, all the while it, hypcortically, plays the two face game'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the tricks to use the [[2022 FIFA World Cup]], in its efforts to spread radical Islamism, among other things, it invited radical preacher Dr. Zakir Naik to teach FIFA fans about Islam.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://millichronicle.com/2022/11/qatar-invites-radical-preacher-dr-zakir-naik-to-teach-fifa-fans-about-islam.html Qatar invites radical preacher Dr. Zakir Naik to teach FIFA fans about Islam], Milli Chronicle,  Nov 19, 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Doha — Qatar has invited the radical preacher Dr. Zakir Naik, infamous for his endorsing views on suicide bombings, to teach the FIFA fans about Islam.&lt;br /&gt;
The famous ScreenMix entertainment magazine tweeted on Saturday, “Qatar invited the famous Islamic preacher Dr. Zakir Naik to deliver religious lectures during the 2022 World Cup.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Pro-Taliban Urdu-Language daily revealed Qatar's plans to Invite FIFA World Cup attendees to Islam: 'Training of 2,000 volunteers for invitation of the religion at the mega event has been completed who will deliver the message of &amp;quot;truth&amp;quot;[sic] to the spectators.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/pro-taliban-urdu-language-daily-reveals-qatars-plans-invite-fifa-world-cup-attendees-islam Pro-Taliban Urdu-Language Daily Reveals Qatar's Plans To Invite FIFA World Cup Attendees To Islam: 'Training Of 2,000 Volunteers For Invitation Of The Religion At The Mega Event Has Been Completed Who Will Deliver The Message Of (so called) Truth(sic) To The Spectators'], ''Memri'', November 18, 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent article, the Pakistan-based Urdu-language pro-Taliban daily Roznama Ummat examined the Qatari government's preparations for da'wa (&amp;quot;preaching,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;invitation to Islam&amp;quot;) at the FIFA World Cup beginning on November 20, 2022. Da'wa is an important part of Islam whereby Muslims are expected to invite non-Muslims to embrace the religion.&lt;br /&gt;
The article, titled &amp;quot;FIFA World Cup And Da'wa Of The Religion,&amp;quot; and written by Islamic religious scholar Zia Chitrali, explains various media activities and events planned to explain Islam to non-Muslim spectators and to try to persuade them to convert. As part of these events planned by Qatari officials, thousands of volunteers will engage in da'wa and free books and pamphlets highlighting Islamic teachings will be distributed among the spectators.&lt;br /&gt;
In a recent article, the Pakistan-based Urdu-language pro-Taliban daily Roznama Ummat examined the Qatari government's preparations for da'wa (&amp;quot;preaching,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;invitation to Islam&amp;quot;) at the FIFA World Cup beginning on November 20, 2022. Da'wa is an important part of Islam whereby Muslims are expected to invite non-Muslims to embrace the religion.&lt;br /&gt;
The article, titled &amp;quot;FIFA World Cup And Da'wa Of The Religion,&amp;quot; and written by Islamic religious scholar Zia Chitrali, explains various media activities and events planned to explain Islam to non-Muslim spectators and to try to persuade them to convert.&lt;br /&gt;
As part of these events planned by Qatari officials, thousands of volunteers will engage in da'wa and free books and pamphlets highlighting Islamic teachings will be distributed among the spectators. [https://www.memri.org/sites/default/files/2022/11/sd10326.jpg].&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The West has turned a blind eye on its terrible human rights abuses.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=latimes-2017&amp;gt;Joshua S. Block&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-block-qatar-terrorism-syria-20170609-story.html Op-Ed: Qatar is a financier of terrorism. Why does the U.S. tolerate it?], ''LA Times'' Jun 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gulf Arabs&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://amp.dw.com/en/how-are-gulf-countries-coming-to-terms-with-their-history-of-slavery/a-60686264 How are Gulf countries coming to terms with their history of slavery?], ''DW'', &lt;br /&gt;
08.02.2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Despite having officially outlawed slavery, Arab states in the Gulf region have downplayed the legacy of repression and racism faced by minorities...&lt;br /&gt;
Modern slavery is still widespread in the Arab states of the Gulf region, where millions of migrant workers are forced to work under grueling conditions with little or no pay.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; have been known to be practicing modern day slavery on the largest scales with racism and worse-than-just apartheid .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar's case came into public eye also for its use of migrants on horrific conditions to prepare for the ''2022 FIFA World Cup''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2016/03/qatar-world-cup-of-shame/ QATAR WORLD CUP OF SHAME], Amnesty, Mar 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Migrants building a state-of-the-art stadium for the 2022 football World Cup in Qatar are abused and exploited – while FIFA makes huge profits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tell FIFA and its sponsors to act now to protect migrant workers in Qatar from abuse.&lt;br /&gt;
Migrants from Bangladesh, India and Nepal working on the refurbishment of the showcase Khalifa Stadium and landscaping the surrounding gardens and sporting facilities known as the “Aspire Zone” are being exploited. Some are being subjected to forced labour. They can’t change jobs, they can’t leave the country and they often wait months to get paid. Meanwhile, FIFA (football’s global governing body), its sponsors and the construction companies involved are set to make massive financial gains from the tournament. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MY LIFE HERE IS LIKE A PRISON. THE MANAGER SAID: ‘IF YOU WANT TO STAY IN QATAR BE QUIET AND KEEP WORKING.’&lt;br /&gt;
Deepak, metal worker on the Khalifa Stadium&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matt Sullivan, [https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/world-cup-built-on-modern-slavery-stadium-workers-blow-the-whistle-on-qatars-cover-up-of-migrant-deaths-1234627582/ A World Cup Built on Modern Slavery': Stadium Workers Blow the Whistle on Qatar’s ‘Coverup’ of Migrant Deaths and Suffering], ''Rolling Stone'', Nov 9, 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 — “This,” says Equidem executive director Mustafa Qadri, “is a World Cup built on modern slavery.” In a statement to Rolling Stone, a spokesperson..&lt;br /&gt;
Anish Adhikari awoke at the Qatari labor camp at 4 a.m. to diarrhea from last night’s rotten fish. His tonsils were swollen from the limited water made available by his employer while working 14 hours a day in 125-degree heat. But he remained hopeful that building air conditioners for 80,000 ticket-holders could provide the equivalent of $8,000 over three years to support his family in Nepal. That he could pay back the loan shark who’d secured Adhikari a job beginning in 2019 with the Hamad Bin Khalid Contracting Co. (HBK), the contracting firm owned by the the highest echelons of Qatar’s ruling Al Thani family. He thought of his father and sickly mother living with his six brothers, their four wives, and their eight children in a hurricane-ravaged farmhouse, using an animal shed for a kitchen. But the 23-year-old soccer fan was helping to construct the site of this year’s World Cup final; some days, when he arrived at Lusail Iconic Stadium before dawn, Adhikari forgot how exhausted he was.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The exact number of fatal victims of the 'Stadiums of Shame' will never be known &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sean Ingle, [https://www.theguardian.com/football/2022/nov/14/stadiums-of-shame-the-numbers-world-cup-hosts-qatar-dont-want-to-be-seen Stadiums of shame: the numbers World Cup hosts Qatar don’t want to be seen], ''The Guardian'', Mon 14 Nov 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;As the world’s media and teams start to arrive the facts and figures behind workers’ and human rights in Qatar remain hard to uncover.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in this Arab [[Islamic]] non-free regime.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2022 FIFA World Cup'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[FIFA]] Officials were bribed to award World Cups to Russia and Qatar,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/06/sports/soccer/qatar-and-russia-bribery-world-cup-fifa.amp.html U.S. Says FIFA Officials Were Bribed to Award World Cups to Russia and Qatar], ''The New York Times'', Apr 6, 2020.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
For nearly a decade, Russia and Qatar have been suspected of buying votes to win hosting rights for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. On Monday, for the first time, the Department of Justice put things in black and white.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=rb-18nov22&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2022/11/18/roger-bennett-amanpour-qatar-world-cup-controversy.cnn 'Sport is political,' says World Cup podcaster], ''CNN'', Nov 18, 2022. (Roger Bennett in interview).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and it has been surrounded by many controversies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ian Ward, [https://www.vox.com/world/23450515/world-cup-fifa-qatar-2022-controversy-scandals-explained The many, many controversies surrounding the 2022 World Cup, explained], ''Vox'', November 19, 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since FIFA awarded the 2022 World Cup to Qatar in 2010, the tournament has been ensnared in a tangled web of scandals.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Including modern day slavery, racist exploitation, thousands of migrants deaths,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.asianews.it/news-en/Over-6,500-migrant-workers-have-died-all-for-2022-soccer-world-cup-52440.html QATAR Over 6,500 migrant workers have died all for 2022 soccer world cup], Asia.it,  Feb 25, 2021&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; cruel limitaion of water drinking while working in the heat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/show/migrant-workers-recount-abuse-while-building-stadiums-for-world-cup-in-qatar Migrant workers recount abuse while building stadiums for World Cup in Qatar], ''PBS'', Nov 18, 2022&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt; The water we got was almost 90 percent ice. We asked why they did that and told them it was impossible to drink water like that....&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aimee Lewis, Pramod Acharya and Sugam Pokharel, [https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/11/17/football/qatar-2022-world-cup-migrant-workers-human-rights-spt-intl/index.html Our dreams never came true.' These men helped build Qatar's World Cup, now they are struggling to survive], ''CNN'', November 17, 2022.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Taliban]] invested heavily in the World Cup construction and the tournament was a golden duck. They were paid millions. The Taliban officials lucrative salaries tied to peace talks to buy and then subcontract heavy machinery for tournament infrastructure over the past decade, a source from the Taliban's Doha office revealed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Joe Wallen, [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/terror-and-security/how-taliban-helped-build-stadiums-qatar-world-cup/ How the Taliban helped build the stadiums for the Qatar World Cup], ''Daily Telegraph'', Nov 25, 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Exclusive: Construction firms allegedly paid ‘millions’ to buy and lease machinery from the Taliban for infrastructure, according to sources&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Taliban made millions from the World Cup by providing construction equipment to build stadiums in Qatar, The Telegraph understands.&lt;br /&gt;
Senior Taliban officials used lucrative salaries tied to peace talks to buy and then subcontract heavy machinery for tournament infrastructure over the past decade, a source from the Taliban's Doha office revealed.&lt;br /&gt;
A large contingent of the Taliban leadership lived in Doha, the capital of Qatar, from 2013 onward where they were engaged in long-running peace talks with the US and UN.&lt;br /&gt;
“The Taliban invested heavily in the World Cup construction and the tournament was a golden duck. They were paid millions,” claimed the source, who lived in Doha in the decade running up to the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan in 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
“Some Taliban members had between six and ten pieces of heavy machinery each in Doha and would earn up to £10,000 per machine per month.”&lt;br /&gt;
Two separate senior Taliban sources described how officials were given lucrative allowances to live in the country during the peace negotiations, which was then invested in heavy construction machinery.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar in cahoots with [[Iran]] stifle voices of dissent during World Cup, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.iranintl.com/en/202211254809 Qatar In Cahoots With Iran To Stifle Voices Of Dissent During World Cup], Iran Intl, 11/25/2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Iran’s soccer team blanked 10-man Wales Friday as World Cup host Qatar prevented Iranian fans from expressing their support for the ongoing protests in their the country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iranian fans, who wanted to take flags other than the official one approved by the Islamic Republic to the Al Rayyan’s Ahmad bin Ali Stadium, were stopped by security officers. Many people were barred from carrying or waving Iran’s ancient flag with the Lion and Sun emblem or a simple three-color flag with the main motto of the current wave of protests – Woman, Life, Liberty.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And [[IRGC]] man said, Qatar is helping Iran silence dissidents in World Cup.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.iranintl.com/en/202211279876 IRGC Man Says Qatar Helping Iran Silence Dissidents In World Cup], IranIntl, Nov 27, 2022.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Documents obtained by Iran International show Iran was coordinating secret efforts with Qatar to control who attends the World Cup and restrict any signs of dissent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Black Reward, a hactivist group that found access to Fars News Agency files this week provided an audio tape of a meeting between a Revolutionary Guard general and a group of media managers or representatives from outfits affiliated with the IRGC about plans to use the sporting event to the benefit of the regime in Tehran.&lt;br /&gt;
A six-minute audio segment of a tape features General Ghasem Ghoreyshi (Qasem Qoreyshi), deputy commander of the paramilitary Basij and a group of reporters including the one from Fars News who met with him possible in the presence of other trusted reporters to discuss the latest developments including plans for the World Cup.&lt;br /&gt;
The meeting took place on Tuesday 15th of November.&lt;br /&gt;
Ghoreyshi starts by saying that “anti-revolutionaries” have bought “5,330 tickets” to the tournament and adds that “our boys have checked the list of the ticket holders and at least 500 people” are known opponents of the Iranian regime.&lt;br /&gt;
This is the first piece of evidence of collaboration with Qatar, showing that Iran obtained the list of ticket buyers most probably from Qatari authorities.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Palestinian&amp;quot; flags were part of an orchestrated campaign pushed by &amp;quot;Palestine&amp;quot; activists, backed by Qataris, to make it look like &amp;quot;spontaneous.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pal Media Watch @palwatch&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/palwatch/status/1599792713469149184 Dec 5, 2022].&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although seemingly spontaneous, #FreePalestine flags at #WorldCup2022 are propaganda props organized by #Palestinian organizations. Palestinian activists hand out flags to be smuggled into the stadiums and be raised at the 48th minute each game.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of Arab racism's instances, the brutal attack on an Egyptian mistakenly believed he was Israeli. &lt;br /&gt;
The Qataris were embarrassed because their officials hadn't believed the poor Egyptian when he insisted he was one of them. And so, they stood by as the mob gave him the &amp;quot;Israeli treatment.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;C. Glick, [https://www.jns.org/opinion/cultural-appropriation-and-the-jews/ Cultural appropriation and the Jews], Dec 2, 2022.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;.. an Egyptian television reporter covering the World Cup tournament in Doha, Qatar was assaulted by an angry mob and forced to leave the games to avoid being lynched. The mob assaulted him because they mistook him for an Israeli reporter.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
German media exposed expressed Arab racism, (masked under supposed worry for &amp;quot;Palestinians&amp;quot;), backed by the gangs of &amp;quot;Qatari dynasty want to use to secure their power.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Martin Krauss, [https://taz.de/Orchestrierte-Israel-Feindschaft/!5897026 German media: Orchestrated hostility toward Israel: Morocco is not in Palestine], Taz, 2022-12-10.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font size=1&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You just have to like World Cup outsiders Morocco – don't you? Adding an anti-Semitic touch to the joy makes things difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palestine plays along: Morocco's team after reaching the quarter-finals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
How could we not be happy that Morocco has one of the eight best football teams in the world ! Finally a team that doesn't come from Europe or South America! In addition - and now follows an interpretation that is surprisingly seldom read at present - a North African team that has gradually chased one colonial power after the other off the football field: Belgium in the preliminary round, Spain in the round of 16; now another nation is waiting with Portugal, which owes its wealth largely to its colonial past. Next, France and the Netherlands could be decolonized in terms of football.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of this, I think, obvious interpretation, the Moroccan success is overlaid with a lot of Palestine symbolism. The Moroccan team held up a Palestine flag after defeating Spain. Tunisian fans did something similar in the preliminary round. And some Qataris are now wearing a &amp;quot;pro-Palestine&amp;quot; armband in response to the Europeans' &amp;quot;One Love&amp;quot; armband, which they see as an impertinence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At first, that seems childishly defiant: ugh, we have our protest too! From a political point of view, however, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is used here to assert an alleged Arab unity. As if fans from Maghreb countries were in the same boat as the Qatari ruling families! In order to prevent protests, which could not least come from Palestinian migrant workers in Qatar, ruling families from the emirate and other regimes are building a bugbear called &amp;quot;Palestine Solidarity&amp;quot;. It is not without reason that Qatar has been financially supporting the terror that the Islamist Hamas is waging against Israel for years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a historical precedent for the transparent pro-Palestine propaganda that so characterizes the World Cup. In 1963, a counter-Olympics were held in Jakarta. Ganefo called it &amp;quot;Games of the New Emerging Forces&amp;quot;. What was supposed to look like a sympathetic rebellion from the then so-called Third World countries was the project of the Indonesian President Sukarno. It was explicitly directed against Israel's participation in world sport.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-racism is still necessary, it can be expressed, for example, in joy at Moroccan soccer successes. But giving that joy an anti-Semitic touch is the twist that gangs like the Qatari dynasty want to use to secure their power.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Encouraging Jihadi massacres'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the racist-Arab Islamic-fascistic butcher's [[2023 Sabbath Jerusalem Synagogue Massacre]],  Al-Jazeera presenters, Journalists In Qatari Press, Qatar-Backed Muslim Clerics: Terrorist Attack: &amp;quot;'brave act' of 'legitimate resistance [sic],' its  perpetrator is a 'hero.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/al-jazeera-presenters-journalists-qatari-press-qatar-backed-muslim-clerics-terrorist-attack Al-Jazeera Presenters, Journalists In Qatari Press, Qatar-Backed Muslim Clerics: Terrorist Attack Near Jerusalem Synagogue Was 'Brave Act' Of 'Legitimate Resistance,' Its Perpetrator Is A 'Hero'] ''Memri'', February 1, 2023.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Lobbying US'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feb 2024 report: Hamas patron Qatar has been lobbying the U.S. Government, given over $5,600,000,000 to US universities since 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adam Kredo, [https://freebeacon.com/national-security/hamas-patron-qatar-has-spent-6-billion-lobbying-the-u-s-government-and-funding-universities/ Hamas Patron Qatar Has Spent $6 Billion Lobbying the U.S. Government and Funding Universities] ''Washington Free Beacon'', Feb 9, 2024.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar, the oil-rich Middle Eastern nation that provides shelter and cash to the Hamas terror group’s top leaders, has spent nearly $6 billion since 2007 lobbying the American government and funneling cash to the United States’ top universities, funding that is generating scrutiny in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
With Qatar emerging as a central mediator in the United States’ attempts to reach a hostage deal between Israel and Hamas, Doha’s decades-long influence peddling operation in America is raising concerns about the country’s ties to the Iran-backed terror group.&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar has given or contracted more than $5.6 billion to 61 American schools since 2007, including Ivy Leagues such as Harvard University, Yale University, Cornell University, and Stanford University, according to funding records reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon. The country has also doled out more than $243 million on lobbying efforts in the United States since 2015, with more than $16 million spent in 2023 alone.&lt;br /&gt;
The money, experts and lawmakers say, has enabled Qatar to have outsized influence in American politics and academia, efforts they say have mainstreamed anti-Israel propaganda and silenced criticism about Doha’s longstanding ties to Hamas, the Iranian regime, and other terror groups. Hamas’s “three top leaders alone are worth a staggering total of $11 billion and enjoy a life of luxury in the sanctuary of the emirate of Qatar,” according to the New York Post.&lt;br /&gt;
The vast funding operation has generated congressional interest in the past and is fueling calls for an investigation by members of the Republican Study Committee (RSC), Congress’s largest GOP caucus, according to lawmakers and senior GOP aides who spoke to the Free Beacon. The RSC, one senior staffer said, is currently pressuring the relevant House oversight committees to investigate Qatar’s lobbying efforts and funding to schools….&lt;br /&gt;
From November 2007 to October 2023, Qatar made 1,116 donations to American universities totaling $5,673,091,815, records show. This has led to accusations that Doha is using its influence with the country’s top schools to mainstream propaganda that portrays Israel in a negative light.&lt;br /&gt;
Through the Qatar Foundation, a state-controlled entity tasked with promoting the country’s interests, the nation has prioritized educational initiatives that employ anti-Israel materials, according to watchdog groups…&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Publicity came about with&lt;br /&gt;
anti-Israel swastika-palestine&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eric Rozenman, [https://www.washingtonjewishweek.com/keffiyeh-as-neo-swastika-fashion-statement/ Keffiyeh as Neo-Swastika Fashion Statement], Washington Jewish Week'', Apr 10, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Henry Kopel, [https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/how-the-keffiyeh-became-the-21st-centurys-swastika/ How the Keffiyeh Became the 21st Century’s Swastika], ''TOI'', May 19, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/389117 Man arrested at pro-Palestinian Arab protest in London for carrying swastika placard], ''INN'', Apr 28, 2024.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Two men arrested at Palestine Solidarity Campaign demonstration in the British capital to call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alana Goodman, [https://freebeacon.com/campus/northwestern-jewish-students-recount-scary-and-shocking-campus-anti-semitism-in-meetings-with-lawmakers/ Northwestern Jewish Students Recount 'Scary and Shocking' Campus Anti-Semitism in Meetings With Lawmakers], ''Free Beacon'', May 2, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.i24news.tv/en/news/international/diaspora-affairs/artc-israeli-student-at-john-hopkins-assaulted-after-speaking-about-hostages Israeli student at John Hopkins assaulted after speaking about hostages], ''i24 news'', May 2, 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;attacker shouted derogatory remarks at her, including demands for her to &amp;quot;go back to Europe,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxla.com/news/usc-swastika-fencepost-usc-palestine-protest Swastika found drawn on USC campus fence post], ''FOX 11 Digital Team'' May 1, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Campus &amp;quot;protests&amp;quot; mobs on campus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2025 it was revealed, &amp;quot;Qatari Defense Minister in past tweets: 'We Are all Hamas'; 'We must plan how to influence the decision-makers in the U.S.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/qatari-defense-minister-past-tweets-we-are-all-hamas-we-must-plan-how-influence-decision Qatari Defense Minister In Past Tweets: 'We Are All Hamas'; 'We Must Plan How To Influence The Decision-Makers In The U.S.']. ''MEMRI'',  March 27, 2025&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Terrorist-State Propaganda'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an elaborated piece in Aug 2024, in ''Commentary''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.commentary.org/seth-mandel/how-terrorist-state-propaganda-became-the-norm-for-u-s-audiences/ How Terrorist-State Propaganda Became the Norm for U.S. Audiences].&lt;br /&gt;
by Seth Mandel. August 8, 2024.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'How Terrorist-State Propaganda Became the Norm for U.S. Audiences.&lt;br /&gt;
It would be unfair to say that all the employees of Al Jazeera who have thus far been investigated for terrorist ties have turned out to be members of Hamas or Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Some are with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, after all.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As it was rightfully said: &amp;quot;Hold Qatar responsible for Al Jazeera’s Terrorist-Journalists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://mosaicmagazine.com/picks/politics-current-affairs/2024/06/hold-qatar-responsible-for-al-jazeeras-terrorist-journalists/ Hold Qatar responsible for Al Jazeera’s Terrorist-Journalists]. ''Mosaic'', &lt;br /&gt;
June 26 2024.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And: &amp;quot;All eyes should be on Al Jazeera for being founded, funded — and directed — by terrorists.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://nypost.com/2024/06/20/opinion/all-eyes-should-be-on-al-jazeera-for-being-founded-funded-and-directed-by-terrorists/ All eyes should be on Al Jazeera for being founded, funded — and directed — by terrorists]. Douglas Murray. ''NYPost''. June 20, 2024.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Wide pro genocidal Hamas support'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 2025 report: Qatari journalists and figures close to Qatar lionize Hamas founder sheikh Ahmad Yassin: &amp;quot;he blazed the path of jihad; the processions of martyrs will not stop until palestine is liberated.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/qatari-journalists-and-figures-close-qatar-lionize-hamas-founder-sheikh-ahmad-yassin-he Qatari Journalists And Figures Close To Qatar Lionize Hamas Founder Sheikh Ahmad Yassin: He Blazed The Path Of Jihad; The Processions Of Martyrs Will Not Stop Until Palestine Is Liberated]. ''MEMRI''. Apr 1, 2025.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==People== &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Qatar people.jpg|right|230px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Natives of the Arabian Peninsula, many Qataris are descended from a number of migratory tribes that came to Qatar in the 18th century from the neighboring areas of Nejd and Al-Hasa. Some came from neighboring Gulf emirates and others are descended from Persian merchants. Most of Qatar's 907,229 inhabitants live in Doha, the capital. Foreigners with temporary residence status make up about three-fourths of the population. Foreign workers comprise 52% of the total population and make up about 89% of the total labor force. Most are South and Southeast Asians, Egyptians, &amp;quot;Palestinians&amp;quot;, Jordanians, and Iranians. About 8,000 U.S. citizens reside in Qatar. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ethnic groups: Arab 40%, Pakistani 18%, Indian 18%, Iranian 10%, other 14%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The various ethnic groups of the country are Arab, Indian, Pakistani, Iranian and so on. Arabic is the official language of Qatar. However, English and Urdu are also spoken widely in various corners of the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.mapsofworld.com/country-profile/qatar-economy-people-culture-and-flag.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For centuries, the main sources of wealth were pearling, fishing, and trade. At one time, Qataris owned nearly one-third of the Persian Gulf fishing fleet. With the [[Great Depression]] and the introduction of [[Japan]]'s cultured-pearl industry, pearling in Qatar declined drastically. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Qataris are mainly Sunni Muslims.  [[Salafi]] Islam is the official religion, and Islamic jurisprudence is the basis of Qatar's legal system, although civil courts have jurisdiction over commercial law. Education is compulsory and free for all Arab residents 6–16 years old. Qatar has an increasingly high literacy rate. 85% of the people are educated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government and Political Conditions== &lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Muslim agenda of the Obama administration}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Doha Palace in Qatar.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Doha Palace.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The ruling Al Thani family continued to hold power following the declaration of independence in 1971. The head of state is the Amir, and the right to rule Qatar is passed on within the Al Thani family. Politically, Qatar is evolving from a traditional society to one based on more formal and democratic institutions to meet the requirements of social and economic progress. The country's constitution formalizes the hereditary rule of the Al Thani family, but it also establishes an elected legislative body and makes government ministers accountable to the legislature. In current practice, the Amir's role is influenced by continuing traditions of consultation, rule by consensus, and the citizen's right to appeal personally to the Amir. The Amir, while directly accountable to no one, cannot violate the Shari'a (Islamic law) and, in practice, must consider the opinions of leading families and the religious establishment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The opinions of the people are institutionalized in the Advisory Council, an appointed body that assists the Amir in formulating policy. However, it is possible that the first elections for this body will occured in 2008. Elections in 1999, in which both men and women participated, resulted in the formation of a municipal council. One woman candidate was elected to the municipal council in 2003.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.todayszaman.com/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?load=detay&amp;amp;link=142359&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Municipal elections were held for the third time in April 2007. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has been no serious challenge to Al Thani rule. As the most visible sign of the move toward openness, the Al Jazeera satellite television station based in Qatar is considered the most free and unfettered broadcast source in the Arab world. In practice, however, Al Jazeera rarely criticizes the ruling Al Thani family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani, one of the richest man in the world, is the ruling Emir of the State of Qatar since 1995. He rose to that position on June 26, 1995, after deposing his father Khalifa bin Hamad Al Thani who was on vacation in Switzerland at the time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nationmaster.com/country/qa-qatar/dem-democracy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present there is not direct election in the electoral system. Since 1992, Sheikh Hamad has selected Qatar's cabinet as in an absolute monarchy. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani with Obamas.jpg|thumb|300px|Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani and wife with Obamas.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2011, ''[[USAToday]]'' quoted Obama:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|President Obama met with the emir of Qatar, praising his help in Libya and his leadership &amp;quot;when it comes to democracy in the Middle East.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That night, Obama provided political donors in Chicago with a somewhat different view of the emir and Qatar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Pretty influential guy,&amp;quot; Obama said of Emir Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, noting that he basically owns the Al Jazeera television network. &amp;quot;He is a big booster, big promoter of democracy all throughout the Middle East. Reform, reform, reform -- you're seeing it on Al Jazeera.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Obama: &amp;quot;Now, he himself is not reforming significantly. There's no big move towards democracy in Qatar.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/04/obama-no-big-move-toward-democracy-in-qatar/1 ''Obama: &amp;quot;No big move toward democracy in Qatar&amp;quot;''].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Days later an editorial in the Doha daily newspaper ''The Peninsula'' responded:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;Mr. President, we have often written about U.S. foreign policy having double standards and being unmindful of the process of change in the Middle East. We do not want U.S. to export democracy to us because we do not want to repeat the Iraq experience.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2011/04/19/Editorial-Qatar-passes-on-US-democracy/UPI-80331303219157/#ixzz1KXWgdFv3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government Officials===&lt;br /&gt;
*Amir, Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, and Minister of Defense—HH Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani&lt;br /&gt;
*Heir Apparent, Deputy Chief of the Armed Forces—HH Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani&lt;br /&gt;
*Prime Minister—Abdullah bin Nasser bin Khalifa Al Thani&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Energy and Industry and Deputy Prime Minister—Abdullah al-Attiyah &lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the U.S.--vacant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foreign Relations==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:White-House-Qatar-Muslim-Brotherhood.jpg|right|300px|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar achieved full independence in an atmosphere of cooperation with the U.K. and friendship with neighboring states. Most Arab states, the U.K., and the U.S. were among the first countries to recognize Qatar, and the state promptly gained admittance to the United Nations and the Arab League. Qatar established diplomatic relations with the U.S.S.R. and China in 1988. It was an early member of [[OPEC]] and a founding member of the GCC. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 1992, tensions arose with Saudi Arabia when Saudi forces allegedly attacked a Qatari border post, resulting in two deaths. Relations have since improved, and a joint commission has been set up to demarcate the border as agreed between the two governments. Most, but not all, of the border issues have been resolved. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For years, both Qatar and Bahrain claimed ownership of the Hawar Islands. The case was eventually referred to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague. The ICJ issued a ruling in June 2001, which both sides accepted. In the agreement Bahrain kept the main Hawar Island but dropped claims to parts of mainland Qatar, while Qatar retained significant maritime areas and their resources. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar is aligned in ideological purpose with the [[Muslim Brotherhood]] – the political umbrella organization of authentic Islam (Taliban, al-Qaeda, ISIS, etc).  The Qatari government previously assisted the U.S. State Department with covert weapons distribution during the Obama/Clinton era.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://shoebat.com/2014/08/01/turkey-qatar-state-sponsors-terrorism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;On July 25, 2012 a US Chinook helicopter was shot down by the Taliban in Afghanistan by the latest generation of the Stinger available for export. A serial number from the missile casing was recovered, tracing the Stinger's origin to a lot entrusted to the [[CIA]] which was delivered to Qatar. Under Obama's covert action finding the Stinger was intended for Libya and Syrian jihadis. Hillary Clinton's State Dept. and [[John Brennan]]'s CIA jointly ran the covert weapons supply program, http://nypost.com/2014/06/08/how-the-taliban-got-their-hands-on-modern-us-missiles/ leaving the Pentagon and Gen.[[Michael Flynn]]'s [[Defense Intelligence Agency]] out of the loop.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Qatar is aligned with the geopolitical interests of the [[Peoples Republic of China]] including the [[Belt and Road Initiative]] for broad global communist Chinese influence.  Qatar, is ideologically aligned with extremist Islam and naturally aligned with Turkey and Pakistan.  Qatar was the host to many [[Gitmo]] detainees that were removed from U.S. custody.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/qatars-prot%C3%A9g%C3%A9s-%E2%80%93-hamas-officials-muslim-brotherhood-al-jazeera-reporters-%E2%80%93-praise-talibans Qatar's Protégés – Hamas Officials, Muslim Brotherhood, Al-Jazeera Reporters – Praise Taliban's 'Jihad' And 'Victory'; Journalists, Liberals In Response: They Should Move To Kabul], ''Memri'', August 19, 2021&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Qatar is where the leadership of the Taliban came from, when they returned to Afghanistan in 2021 to take control of advanced weapon technology abandoned by U.S. [[Democrat]] socialist leader [[Joe Biden]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2021/08/18/left-behind-billions-in-u-s-equipment-for-the-afghanistan-taliban-to-use-against-us-n1470346&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Libyan and Syrian wars and the Islamic State===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Arab Spring|Obama war crimes}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hillary Clinton email scandal|Hillary Clinton's emails]] boast of [[Hillary Clinton]] engaging with [[UAE]], Qatar, and [[Jordan]] between March 18–30, 2011 to seek their participation in coalition operations. Over the course of several days, all three devote aircraft to the mission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[Muammar Gaddafi]] shut down Libya's Internet system in early March,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://goodtimesweb.org/surveillance/wsj-libya-spies-firms-aug-30-2011.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Qatar had given the rebel jihadis access to its satellites.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2011/10/28/sen-mccains-libyan-two-step/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A week after Gaddafi's murder, Qatar took credit for sending hundreds of troops into Libya to provide training, communications and strategy. Qatar &amp;quot;acted as the link between the rebels and [[Nato]] forces.&amp;quot; ''Guardian'' adds,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/oct/26/qatar-troops-libya-rebels-support&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Some, however, express concern at the emirate's support for [[Islamist]] elements such as the 17 February Martyrs Brigade, one of the most influential rebel formations, led by Abdel-Hakim Belhaj.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 6, 2012 the ''New York Times'' confirmed &lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|&amp;quot;Qataris provided weapons, money and training to various rebel groups in Libya [destined for Syria]. One militia that received aid was controlled by [Abdelhakim Belhadj], then leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, who was held by the C.I.A. in 2004...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/africa/weapons-sent-to-libyan-rebels-with-us-approval-fell-into-islamist-hands.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 3, 2013 an arms flight was reported from Qatar to Istanbul destined for [[Islamic State]] rebels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On May 16 the ''Financial Times'' reported Qatar had spent $3 billion over the past two years bankrolling the jihadi rebels in Syria.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Aid to the Islamic State and the Benghazi massacre===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Benghazi massacre}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:NYT - Arms Pipeline to the Syrian Rebels.png|right|300px|thumb|CIA pipeline of arms from Qatar to groups in Turkey which became the Islamic State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://fair.org/home/down-the-memory-hole-nyt-erases-cias-efforts-to-overthrow-syrias-government/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Illustration: New York Times'']]&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2012, President [[Barack Obama]] signed a Presidential Finding authorizing transfer of captured weapons from [[Libya]] to groups that became the Islamic State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mark Hosenball, [https://web.archive.org/web/20170216061621/https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/01/obama-secret-syria-order_n_1730712.html?tw_p=twt Obama Secret Syria Order Authorizes Support For Rebels], ''Reuters'' via ''HuffPost'', &lt;br /&gt;
08/01/2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''[[Reuters]]'' reported &lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|under provisions of the presidential finding, the United States was collaborating with a secret command center operated by Turkey and its allies.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last week, Reuters reported that, along with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Turkey had '''established a secret base near the Syrian border to help direct vital military and communications support to Assad’s opponents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This “nerve center” is in Adana, a city in southern Turkey about 60 miles (100 km) from the Syrian border, which is also home to Incirlik, a U.S. air base where U.S. military and intelligence agencies maintain a substantial presence.'''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Turkey’s moderate Islamist government has been demanding Assad’s departure with growing vehemence. Turkish authorities are said by current and former U.S. government officials to be increasingly involved in providing Syrian rebels with training and possibly equipment.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
European government sources said wealthy families in Saudi Arabia and Qatar were providing significant financing to the rebels. Senior officials of the Saudi and Qatari governments have publicly called for Assad’s departure.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[[The Guardian]]'' reported,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|these were not average members of the Free Syrian Army. Abu Khuder and his men fight for [[al-Qaida]]. They call themselves the ghuraba’a, or “strangers”, after a famous jihadi poem celebrating Osama bin Laden’s time with his followers in the Afghan mountains, and they are one of a number of jihadi organisations establishing a foothold in the east of the country now that the conflict in Syria has stretched well into its second bloody year.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They try to hide their presence. “Some people are worried about carrying the [black] flags” ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...[they] are working closely with the military council that commands the Free Syrian Army brigades in the region. “We meet almost every day,” he said. “We have clear instructions from our [al-Qaida] leadership that if the FSA need our help we should give it. We help them with IEDs and car bombs. Our main talent is in the bombing operations” ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“The FSA lacks the ability to plan and lacks military experience. That is what [al-Qaida] can bring. ...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“In the beginning there were very few. Now, mashallah, there are immigrants joining us and bringing their experience,” he told the gathered people. “Men from [[Yemen]], Saudi, Iraq and Jordan...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“[Al-Qaida’s] goal is establishing an Islamic state and not a Syrian state,” he replied. “Those who fear the organisation fear the implementation of Allah’s jurisdiction... https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/jul/30/al-qaida-rebels-battle-syria}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Amb. [[Christopher Stevens]] was put in charge of the covert operation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/africa/weapons-sent-to-libyan-rebels-with-us-approval-fell-into-islamist-hands.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The aim was to arm jihadist groups which then transformed themselves into the [[Islamic State of Iraq and Syria]] with the goal of overthrowing [[Bashar al Assad]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/25/world/middleeast/arms-airlift-to-syrian-rebels-expands-with-cia-aid.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''[[New York Times]]'' reported [[David Petraeus]] had been instrumental in helping to get an aviation network moving to supply ISIS rebels and prodded various countries to work together on it. Three Royal Jordanian Air Force [[C-130]]s landed in Esenboga, Turkey in a hint at what would become a stepped-up Jordanian and Saudi role.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;“Within three weeks, two other Jordanian cargo planes began making a round-trip run between Amman, the capital of Jordan, and [[Zagreb]], the capital of [[Croatia]], where, officials from several countries said, the aircraft were picking up a large Saudi purchase of infantry arms from a Croatian-controlled stockpile.&amp;quot; Two Jordanian Ilyushins bearing the logo of the Jordanian International Air Cargo firm but flying under Jordanian military call signs made a combined 36 round-trip flights between [[Amman]] and Croatia from December 2012 through February 2013. The same two planes made five flights between Amman and Turkey in January 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;As the Jordanian flights were under way, the Qatari flights continued and the Royal Saudi Air Force began a busy schedule, too — making at least 30 C-130 flights into Esenboga from mid-February 2013 to early March 2013, according to flight data provided by a regional air traffic control official.”  American officials have confirmed that senior [[White House]] officials were regularly briefed on the shipments.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/RQHyy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Edward Snowden]] leaked details of a program that trained approximately 10,000 jihadi fighters at a cost of $1 billion a year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://fair.org/home/down-the-memory-hole-nyt-erases-cias-efforts-to-overthrow-syrias-government/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2021 Gaza War===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Guardian of Walls}}&lt;br /&gt;
The building demolished by the [[Israeli Defense Forces]] housed anti-Israel [[Al Jazeera]] which is owned by Qatar, a supporter of Hamas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Spencer S. Hsu: &amp;quot;Lawsuits by U.S. victims accuse top Qatar banks and charity of financing terrorism in Israel.&amp;quot; Washington Post, Dec. 15, 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/lawsuits-by-us-victims-accuse-top-qatar-banks-and-charity-of-financing-terrorism-in-israel/2020/12/15/4ebea7fe-244a-11eb-a688-5298ad5d580a_story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the ceasefire in May/2021, Al Jazeera was applauded in Gaza rally.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2021/05/24/watch-gazans-applaud-al-jazeera-correspondent-during-hamas-victory-celebrations/ WATCH: Gazans Applaud Al-Jazeera Correspondent During Hamas ‘Victory’ Celebrations] Joshua Klein, May 24, 2021&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2023/4 Gaza jihad war===&lt;br /&gt;
Weeks after the [[Shield and arrow]] op.  , ''against the backdrop of the latest round of fighting between Israel and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in Gaza, Palestinian journalist Samir Al-Barghouti, a columnist for the Qatari daily Al-Watan, called on the Palestinians of all factions to carry out terror attacks throughout Israel, from the north to the south, in order to inflict blows on the Israelis and terrify them.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/article-qatari-daily-incites-palestinians-carry-out-terror-attacks-throughout-israel Article In Qatari Daily Incites Palestinians To Carry Out Terror Attacks Throughout Israel], ''Memri'', May 22, 2023.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Against the backdrop of the latest round of fighting between Israel and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in Gaza, Palestinian journalist Samir Al-Barghouti, a columnist for the Qatari daily Al-Watan, called on the Palestinians of all factions to carry out terror attacks throughout Israel, from the north to the south, in order to inflict blows on the Israelis and terrify them. He also urged the Arab countries to open up the fronts against Israel and expel the Israeli ambassadors from their territory, lest it become too late for them to repent. &amp;quot;The historical and religious promise regarding Palestine will soon be realized,&amp;quot; he stated, and therefore it is necessary to keep up the attacks on Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that Al-Barghouti often calls for armed struggle against Israel. In fact, only two months ago he published a similar article inciting to besiege, pursue and attack the Israelis in Tel Aviv and in every part of Palestine, from the river to the sea.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exposing Qatar: The truth behind its global influence. Digital marketing expert began countering anti-Israel narratives after [[October 7 War|October 7]], launching a viral Hamas-ISIS campaign; she exposed misinformation, highlighting Qatar’s influence as both Western cultural investor and sponsor of terror.&lt;br /&gt;
She witnessed a wave of misinformation on social media, with prominent accounts denying the atrocities or circulating videos of hostages. She launched a viral campaign aimed at exposing Qatar’s dual role as a cultural and financial influencer in the West and as a sponsor of groups like Hamas. &amp;quot;They are invested in billions in education in the West from the age of 6 until the end of university when people are 22. They're the biggest donors to elite Ivy League universities in the U.S., and they demand to control what is being taught and who is the staff that teaches that. Apart from that, they're purchasing cultural assets of the West,&amp;quot; she said.&lt;br /&gt;
She accused Qatar of using its wealth to silence criticism of its support for organizations such as Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood and even ISIS. &amp;quot;In the Israeli case, when we look at their efforts to mediate between Hamas and Israel regarding the hostage deal. This is not a mediator that says, 'there are two sides and I'm here to mitigate between them.' This is a country that puts on its buildings the flags of Palestine, Hamas, Sinwar and Haniyeh on a weekly basis and portrays them as heroes. They're also the owners of Al Jazeera, whose Arabic, English and its version to Gen Z on social media, AJ+, are inciting against Israel,&amp;quot; she added, citing Qatar’s funding of international institutions like the International Court of Justice.'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sharon Kidon, [https://www.ynetnews.com/culture/article/r1f26r6rke Exposing Qatar: The truth behind its global influence]. ''Ynet'', Dec 28, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2023: Al Jazeera inciting, in service of Qatar, Hamas, MB===&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2023, the [[Palestinian Authority]] claimed that Al Jazeera is inciting Arabs against them &amp;quot;in service of Qatar, Hamas, [[Muslim Brotherhood]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/palestinian-authority-al-jazeera-incites-against-us-service-qatar-hamas-muslim-brotherhood Palestinian Authority: Al-Jazeera Incites Against Us In Service Of Qatar, Hamas, Muslim Brotherhood; We Will Consider Taking Legal Measures Against It; Al-Jazeera In Response: Our Coverage Is Balanced And Professional], ''Memri'', July 11, 2023&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Swords of Iron]]===&lt;br /&gt;
Report raises questions about Qatar’s knowledge of Oct. 7 atrocities.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Western intelligence officials interviewed by Politico in recent weeks say that Qatar, a longtime patron of Hamas in Gaza, may have had prior knowledge of the Oct. 7 attack on Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We’re still looking into it,” a top intelligence official from a major European country told the U.S. news site when asked if Doha had advanced information about the mass assault. The source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity given the sensitivity of the issue, added that there was “smoke,” but no smoking gun.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.jns.org/report-raises-questions-about-qatars-knowledge-of-oct-7-attack/ Report raises questions about Qatar’s knowledge of Oct. 7 attack.&lt;br /&gt;
Doha had a lot to gain from the Hamas assault on southern Israel, Western intelligence officers say], ''JNS'', Jan 11, 2024.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hamas-Al-Jazeera-Qatar ties exposed===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Oct 2024, &amp;quot;following the exposure of the involvement of six Al Jazeera correspondents who took part in Hamas’s terrorist activities, the IDF spokesperson in Arabic, Col. Avichay Adraee, revealed a series of documents that point to the depth of the close cooperation between Hamas and the Qatari channel, including Hamas’s directive to prevent any mention of criticism of the terrorist organization, through covering up failed rocket launches, and even the establishment of a secure communication line between Hamas and Al Jazeera.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ohad Merlin, [https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-826206 Hamas-Al-Jazeera-Qatar ties exposed in new IDF documents, online eulogies]. ''The Jerusalem Post'', Oct 26, 2024.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
New documents formulated by Hamas reveal the depth of Al Jazeera's cooperation with the terrorist group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the exposure of the involvement of six Al Jazeera correspondents who took part in Hamas’s terrorist activities, the IDF spokesperson in Arabic, Col. Avichay Adraee, revealed a series of documents that point to the depth of the close cooperation between Hamas and the Qatari channel, including Hamas’s directive to prevent any mention of criticism of the terrorist organization, through covering up failed rocket launches, and even the establishment of a secure communication line between Hamas and Al Jazeera.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Taliban takeover August-2021===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Fall of Kabul}}&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2021, Qatar's managed Al-Jazeera celebrated the [[Taliban]] take over as a fanatical-religious win for the entire Islamic nation. The Ummah.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.memri.org/reports/al-jazeera-reporters-celebrate-taliban-victory-us-defeat-historic-triumph-islamic-ummah Al-Jazeera Reporters Celebrate 'Taliban Victory', 'U.S. Defeat' As Historic Triumph For Islamic Ummah], Memri, August 18, 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar | Special Dispatch No. 9503&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban's takeover of the country sparked many reactions worldwide, including in the Arab world. Conspicuous among these reactions were expressions of joy by Islamist organizations such as Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad,the International Union of Muslim Scholars and various elements identified with the Muslim Brotherhood.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It joined other Islamic infamous group such as Islamist organizations such as [[Hamas]], the [[Palestinian Islamic Jihad]]. As Qatar is aligned in ideological purpose with the [[Muslim Brotherhood]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unsurprisingly, Al-Jazeera channel received from Taliban exclusive access to the presidential palace in Kabul.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;roi kais (@kaisos1987) Tweeted:&lt;br /&gt;
The Qatari Al-Jazeera channel receives from Taliban exclusive access to the presidential palace in Kabul.  No need to be surprised  https://t.co/h53JupS8OP [https://twitter.com/kaisos1987/status/1426974071145877507?s=20 Aug 15, 2021]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, ond of the big gainers at [[Taliban]]'s rise is  the &amp;quot;tiny Qatar&amp;quot;, capable of disproportionate intervention in their affairs not hers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ilan Zalayat @ilanzalayat Tweeted:&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
While everyone is talking about the effects of the turbulent upheaval in Afghanistan on neighbors like China or Iran, it is becoming clear that one of the big gainers is actually the tiny Qatar capable of disproportionate intervention in their affairs not hers.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://mobile.twitter.com/ilanzalayat/status/1428345434016256003 Aug 19, 2021]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The French magazine Charlie Hebdo publicized a cartoon exposing Qatar's hypocrisy: On the one hand, there is the transfer of Messi to Paris Saint-Germain&lt;br /&gt;
And on the other hand host and fund the Taliban. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For Qatar lovers and interested people,&lt;br /&gt;
French 'Charlie Hebdo'&lt;br /&gt;
On the hypocrisy and Qatari bipolarity&lt;br /&gt;
On the one hand, there is the transfer of Messi to Paris Saint-Germain&lt;br /&gt;
And on the other hand it hosts and funds the Taliban.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://twitter.com/oritperlov/status/1429773962871984130 Aug 23, 2021] (It reads &amp;quot;It's worse than what we thought&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Immediately after the Kabul airport suicide bombing killing 170, and the withdrawal of American troops, the Taliban requested assistance from Qatar to run the airport.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/08/27/taliban-ask-qatar-for-technical-assistance-running-kabul-airport/ Taliban Ask Qatar For Technical Assistance Running Kabul Airport], Conservative Tree House, Aug 27, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CCP United Front Work Department===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|United Front Work Department}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Brookings Institution]] Doha Center, the [[think tank]]’s hub in Qatar, signed a memorandum of understanding with the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences in January 2018.  The partnership piqued the FBI's interest about potential [[Chinese Communist Party]] (CCP) espionage activities at the think tank, which employed nearly two dozen [[foreign policy]] advisers to the [[Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/national-security/brookings-institution-partnered-with-shanghai-policy-center-under-scrutiny-for-spying/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Clinton Foundation===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Clinton Foundation]] accepted multimillion-dollar donations from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, two Gulf Arab states that also financed the Islamic State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264493/saudi-arabia-and-qatar-bankroll-isis-%E2%80%94-and-clinton-joseph-klein Saudi Arabia and Qatar bankroll ISIS -- and the Clinton Foundation],&amp;quot; ''Frontpage Mag''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Marc Bennett===&lt;br /&gt;
The 'Jamal Khashoggi vs. Marc Bennett'  exposed iberal hypocrisy,  criminal Qatar / Islamist supremacy on non-Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Khashoggi passion play coincides with information about Qatar’s murder of Marc Bennett, a British citizen who was brutally tortured without a word of protest from the West.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Daniel Greenfield]], [https://www.frontpagemag.com/jamal-khashoggi-vs-marc-bennett-whose-life-matters/ Jamal Khashoggi vs. Marc Bennett: Whose Life Matters?], FPM, Oct 5, 2022 .&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=1&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
One British man’s death in Qatar reveals the dirty truth about the traitors within.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an annual propaganda ritual, the heads of foreign governments and media operatives marked the anniversary of Jamal Khashoggi’s death by tweeting condemnations of the killing of the old friend of Osama bin Laden who had been recruited by an Al Qaeda financier to promote Jihad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a testament to the unchallenged power of the Islamic tyranny of Qatar that everyone in Washington D.C. unquestioningly takes a knee and pays tribute to its martyred operative.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Jamal Khashoggi’s murder 4 years ago was also an attack on freedom of expression everywhere,” Secretary of State Blinken tweeted. There’s no such thing as “freedom of expression” among Khashoggi’s Qatari employees. Khashoggi was not fighting for any kind of freedom, but for an Islamist tyranny of the kind practiced by Qatar’s fellow Islamists in Iran. Had he gotten his way, liberals in Saudi Arabia would be the ones being brutally murdered.&lt;br /&gt;
As they are in Iran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Western elites have spent far less time expressing outrage about the torture and mass murder by Iran’s Islamic regime of thousands of dissidents and protesters than they have over the death of an Islamist whose death equally outraged Al Qaeda and ISIS as it did Washington D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Washington Post was much less exercised about one of its own reporters, Jason Rezaian, being held hostage in Iran for over a year than over Jamal Khashoggi, a foreign operative running press releases from the Qatari Foundation in its digital pages at the behest of Qatar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This year the annual Khashoggi passion play coincides with information about Qatar’s murder of Marc Bennett, a British citizen who was brutally tortured without a word of protest from the West.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If Blinken has expressed a word of concern about Bennett’s killing by Khashoggi’s backers, I have yet to find it. The British government closed the case and has shown no interest. The Washington Post has never allowed Bennett’s name to appear in its pages. That might offend its Qatari masters. Despite having been killed a year after Khashoggi, there is still virtually no mention of Bennett by the politicians, influencers and media operatives who claim that they only care about the Qatari terrorist agenda because they are so deeply moved by human rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike Khashoggi’s death, Bennett’s death was not political. He was just one of the many foreign workers whom Qatar’s slave masters considered their personal property. When Bennett tried to leave Qatar Airlines, he was treated like any of the other foreign workers, mostly Indian, Asian and African, who are routinely beaten, tortured and worked to death in the Islamic tyranny.&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between the thousands of foreign workers who have died to erect the glittering towers of Doha, who prepare for the World Cup, and who attend to the needs of the slave masters of Qatar, is that Bennett was a westerner. But to the Islamic slave masters of Qatar and others in the region, all non-Arabs and non-Muslims are inferior subhuman slaves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the most recent report in The London Times, “Bennett had been taken blindfolded and handcuffed to a state security detention centre. Bennett later described how he was stripped naked, blasted with high-pressure hoses, slammed against walls.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His alleged crime was trying to leave Qatar Airways which, like most of the major organizations, including Al Jazeera, is controlled by Qatar’s ruling family.  According to the Qataris, Bennett later “committed suicide” in a hotel room in Doha on Christmas Day. The timing must have amused his Islamist killers. According to his wife, his clothes had been laid in his hotel room as if he were preparing to go out and the circumstances of the crime scene don’t comport with those of a suicide. British investigators noted, “no specific evidence of suicidal intent”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British government has issued multiple statements about Khashoggi’s death even though the Bin Laden pal was never a British citizen or related to the UK in any meaningful way. It has shrugged at Bennett’s death and then gotten on with the business of asking Qatar for cash.&lt;br /&gt;
The BBC has one mention of Bennett. It has hundreds of results for Khashoggi.&lt;br /&gt;
Last year, the British government declared that it continues to raise the “terrible crime” of Khashoggi’s death with Saudi Arabia. No such efforts have been made to raise the death of Marc Bennett, a Briton who was not an associate of Islamic terrorists or an enemy agent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The relative silence over Bennett’s death and the hysterical fury over Khashoggi’s demise reveal more than a double standard, but the deep level of political control Qatar wields over the West.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Westerners don’t need to be physically within the boundaries of Qatar, for the Islamic terror state to have almost as much control over their lives as it did over that of Marc Bennett.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oil-glutted Islamic terrorist state has not only escaped the consequences for its crimes, but it sets the political agenda for Washington D.C. and much of the western world. Between Al Jazeera, which sets the media’s agenda for the region, and Brookings, the powerful Democrat think tank whose associates fill the ranks of the Biden administration, Qatar rules over us.&lt;br /&gt;
The Muslim Brotherhood, which Qatar backs, continues to enjoy safe harbor in America. Its various affiliates have not only been immunized from prosecution, but have been deeply embedded in our government, our political system and our culture. To understand not only our failure to stop Islamic terrorism after 9/11, but the disastrous surrender to the Taliban, overseen by Qatar, which played godfather to the Taliban talks, you have to recognize its influence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khashoggi’s omnipresence in our culture and Bennett’s nonexistence is a testimony of the far darker truths about how our governments have sold us out to be killed by Islamic terrorists and their state sponsors while blasting us with propaganda that turns the terrorists into victims.&lt;br /&gt;
“We were hoping to establish an Islamic state anywhere,” Khashoggi reminisced about his time together with Osama bin Laden in the Muslim Brotherhood. “We believed that the first one would lead to another, and that would have a domino effect which could reverse the history of mankind.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find that Islamic state in Washington D.C. now where everyone from Tim Kaine to Mitt Romney pushes Khashoggi propaganda. Lindsay Graham tried to hold up a bill for Osama bin Laden’s old pal. Bernie Sanders attacked Biden for not holding gas prices in this country hostage to the Qatari agent. While our political class may differ on so many issues, when it comes to what Qatar wants, they are all in agreement. And they are all betraying us.&lt;br /&gt;
Khashoggi’s death was indeed revealing. And what it revealed is that our countries are rotten with politicians and media outlets who willingly serve as the tools of an Islamic terrorist state.&lt;br /&gt;
That is why they won’t talk about Bennett’s death.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the Cold War, when a Communist ran into trouble anywhere, human rights organizations, journalists and politicians would rush to his defense in the name of humanity. But when countless people were tortured, starved and killed in Communist prisons, they were silent.&lt;br /&gt;
What was true of the USSR is still true of China and of Qatar.&lt;br /&gt;
Every time you hear about Jamal Khashoggi, you are seeing Qatar’s influence at work and you are witnessing traitors out themselves. Listen carefully. And remember Bennett’s Qatar,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Khashoggi was an agent of the foreign Islamist powers that rule over us. Bennett is us.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Unlike Khashoggi’s death, Bennett’s death was not political. He was just one of the many foreign workers whom Qatar’s slave masters considered their personal property. When Bennett tried to leave Qatar Airlines, he was treated like any of the other foreign workers, mostly Indian, Asian and African, who are routinely beaten, tortured and worked to death in the Islamic tyranny.&lt;br /&gt;
The only difference between the thousands of foreign workers who have died to erect the glittering towers of Doha, who prepare for the World Cup, and who attend to the needs of the slave masters of Qatar, is that Bennett was a westerner. But to the Islamic slave masters of Qatar and others in the region, all non-Arabs and non-Muslims are inferior subhuman slaves.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Training [[Hamas]] terrorists===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2024, Qatar’s regime became under fire for training Hamas terrorists: 'Qatar is Hamas and Hamas is Qatar'.Qatar – which is known for supporting Hamas, financing its military activity and sheltering its leaders, and for extending media support to Hamas by means of its Al-Jazeera channel – also trained, in its Police College in Al-Rayyan, officers from Hamas' Interior and National Security Ministry, which is part of Hamas' governing authorities in the Gaza Strip Given the sensitivity, especially regarding the hostages, neither the IDF nor the Foreign Ministry were willing to comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar has lashed out at American Jews and Congressional representatives who demonstrated in front of their Washington embassy calling for Doha to pressure Hamas to release the hostages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Benjamin Weinthal, [https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-788543 Qatar’s regime under fire for training Hamas terrorists: 'Qatar is Hamas and Hamas is Qatar'], ''JPost'',  February 23, 2024&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Apartheid and racism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arab [[Apartheid]], such as anti Asian racism, is rampant in Qatar.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://amp.theguardian.com/cities/2018/oct/09/the-qatari-mall-without-qataris-you-cant-ignore-the-racial-undertones-doha Asian Town, Qatar's mall for migrants: 'You can't ignore the racial undertones'], Pete Pattisson and Naveen Nair in Doha, The Guardian, Oct 9, 2018.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The new Asian Town mall was designed to cater to Qatar’s roughly 2 million migrant workers – but critics say it is simply a way to segregate them... The Gulf countries take deliberate measures to dissuade migrants bringing their families with them, and then justify the ghettos and zoning regulations under the pretext of security,” Saraswathi said. “Time and again, Asian male migrants are kept away because they are ‘bachelors’, while the same wouldn’t apply to western or Arab single men. One can’t ignore the racial undertones.”&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And Qatar can't explain the thousands of deaths in a decade.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pete Pattisson, &amp;quot;[https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/aug/26/qatar-has-failed-to-explain-up-to-70-of-migrant-worker-deaths-in-past-10-years-amnesty Qatar has failed to explain up to 70% of migrant worker deaths in past 10 years – Amnesty],&amp;quot; The Guardian , Aug 26, 2021.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
World Cup host has not properly investigated fatalities, rights group says, citing concerns over heat stress and safety&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
World Cup host Qatar has failed to investigate the deaths of thousands of migrant workers in the past decade, according to a new report by Amnesty International.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The human rights organisation said the majority of migrant worker deaths in Qatar are attributed to “natural causes”, cardiac or respiratory failure; classifications which are “meaningless” without the underlying cause of death explained, according to one expert cited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result, as many as 70% of deaths may be unexplained. “In a well resourced health system, it should be possible to identify the exact cause of death in all but 1% of cases,” the report said.... In February the Guardian revealed that more than 6,500 migrant workers from south Asia had died in Qatar in the past decade...&lt;br /&gt;
In February the Guardian revealed that more than 6,500 migrant workers from south Asia had died in Qatar in the past decade.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Bigotry / genocidal==&lt;br /&gt;
In a classic example. When in Jan 2020, in a historic visit by the Secretary General of the Islamic World League, Dr. Muhammad al-Issa, to the Auschwitz extermination camp in Poland, led by a delegation of 25 senior Muslim clerics, a few days before International Holocaust Remembrance Day - it had support for it in Saudi Arabia, but it was condemned in Qatar.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.memri.org.il/cgi-webaxy/item?5172 Historic visit of the head of the Islamic World League to the Auschwitz camp - support for in Saudi Arabia, condemnations in Qatar], Memri, 3/2/2020.&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On January 23, the visit of the Secretary General of the Islamic World League, Dr. Muhammad al-Issa, to the Auschwitz extermination camp in Poland, led by a delegation of 25 senior Muslim clerics, a few days before International Holocaust Remembrance Day, was a historic precedent for his first visit.  A senior Muslim delegation in an extermination camp commemorating the Holocaust of the Jews of Europe.  Thus, and following al-Issa's statements during the visit in condemnation of the Holocaust, the visit provoked many different reactions in the Arab and Islamic world...&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apr 22, 2024: One of Qatar's representatives speaking at Arab League: “[[Oct 7 War|October 7th]] is only the beginning. We will eliminate all the Jews”.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Visegrád 24 @visegrad24 ([https://twitter.com/visegrad24/status/1782821718022586749 Apr 23, 2024]):&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Islamic regime in Iran isn’t the only problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar is also highly problematic to say the least.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here we have one of their representatives speaking at an Arab League yesterday:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“October 7th is only the beginning. We will eliminate all the Jews”.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kosher🎗🧡 · Apr 23, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
@KosherCockney&lt;br /&gt;
Replying to @KosherCockney ([https://twitter.com/KosherCockney/status/1782898725976678764 Apr 23, 2024]):&lt;br /&gt;
I also forgot about Al Jazeera. They own that too who have spread lies and blood libels since the start, had a journalist participate in Oct7th, have plenty of “journalists” in Gaza who report the most outrageous lies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yeah Qatar is pure evil when you had that to the other…&lt;br /&gt;
Kosher🎗🧡 @KosherCockney:&lt;br /&gt;
Hi guys I have a version with subtitles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He actually says “The Al-Aqsa operation is only the prelude to the elimination of the Jews”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So yeah fu_ck this guy and fu_ck Qatar.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Military==&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar's defense expenditures are estimated to be in the range of 10% of GDP. Qatar maintains a military force of about 12,000 men, including an army, navy, and air force. The country has a public security force of about 8,000 men, including a coast guard, national firefighting force, air wing, marine police, and an internal security force. Qatar also has signed defense pacts with the U.S., U.K., and France. Qatar plays an active role in the collective defense efforts of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC—the regional organization of the Arab states in the Gulf; the other five members are Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, the U.A.E., and Oman). Qatari forces played an important role in the first Gulf War, and Qatar has supported U.S. military operations critical to the success of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom.  Al Udeid, one of America's largest Air Force bases, remains a critical asset to operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael R. Gordon With Eric Schmitt, [https://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/28/world/aftereffects-bases-us-will-move-air-operations-to-qatar-base.html?sec=&amp;amp;spon=&amp;amp;pagewanted=1 AFTEREFFECTS: BASES; U.S. Will Move Air Operations To Qatar Base], ''The New York Times'', &lt;br /&gt;
April 28, 2003&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Qatar hosts CENTCOM Forward Headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
Oil formed the cornerstone of Qatar's economy well into the 1990s and still accounts for about 62% of total government revenue. In 1973, oil production and revenues increased sizably, moving Qatar out of the rank of the world's poorest countries and providing it with one of the highest per capita incomes. In 2006, Qatar's per capita income of nearly $62,000 was the fifth-highest in the world. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Industrial Gas Oil Qatar.jpg|right|300px|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar's economy suffered a downturn from in the mid-1990s. Lower Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) oil production quotas, a fall in oil prices, and the generally unpromising outlook on international markets reduced oil earnings. In turn, the Qatari Government cut spending plans to match lower income. The resulting recessionary local business climate caused many firms to lay off expatriate staff. With the economy recovering in the late 1990s, expatriate populations have grown again. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oil production is currently around 835,000 barrels a day (bpd), and is expected to reach 1.1 million bpd by 2009. At the current production pace, oil reserves are expected to last more than 40 years. Moreover, Qatar's proven reserves of gas are the third-largest in the world, exceeding 900 trillion cubic feet (14% of the world's total proven gas reserves). Qatar shares with Iran the largest single non-associated gas field in the world, the North Field. Qatar is now the world's largest producer of liquefied natural gas (LNG), with a capacity of more than 31 million metric tons per annum (mmta), and it expects to reach 77.5 mmta of LNG exports by 2010. By 2010, Qatar will account for one-third of the world's LNG supply. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1991 completion of the $1.5-billion Phase I of the North Field gas development project strongly boosted the economy. In 1996, Qatar began exporting liquefied natural gas to Japan. Further phases of North Field gas development costing billions of dollars are in various stages of planning and development, and Qatar has concluded agreements with the U.A.E. to export gas via pipelines and to Spain, Turkey, Italy, the U.S., France, South Korea, India, China, Taiwan, and the U.K. via ship. However, the government has halted any further expansion of gas production until 2010, as it assesses its plans for future exploitation of the field. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar's natural gas liquefaction facilities and related industries are located in Ras Laffan Industrial City, site of the world's largest LNG exports of more than 31 million metric tons per year. Qatar's heavy industrial base, located in Messaieed, includes a refinery with a 140,000 bpd capacity, a fertilizer plant for urea and ammonia, a steel plant, and a petrochemical plant, and several new petrochemical plants will be built in the coming years. All these industries use gas for fuel. Most are joint ventures between U.S., European, and Japanese firms and the state-owned Qatar Petroleum (QP). The U.S. is the major equipment supplier for Qatar's oil and gas industry, and U.S. companies are playing a major role in the development of the oil and gas sector and petrochemicals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The country's economic growth has been stunning. Qatar's nominal GDP, currently around $52.7 billion, has grown an average of 15% over the past five years. GDP is expected to grow approximately 8.3% in 2007. Qatar's per capita GDP is more than $60,000, and projected to soon be the highest in the world. The Qatari Government's strategy is to utilize its wealth to generate more wealth by diversifying the economic base of the country beyond hydrocarbons. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar pursues a vigorous program of &amp;quot;Qatarization,&amp;quot; under which all joint venture industries and government departments strive to move Qatari nationals into positions of greater authority. Growing numbers of foreign-educated Qataris, including many educated in the U.S., are returning home to assume key positions formerly occupied by expatriates. In order to control the influx of expatriate workers, Qatar has tightened the administration of its foreign manpower programs over the past several years. Security is the principal basis for Qatar's strict entry and immigration rules and regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
For 2011, despite the global financial crisis, Qatar has maintained its economic growth of the last several years. Qatari authorities throughout the crisis sought to protect the local banking sector with direct investments into domestic banks. GDP rebounded in 2010 largely due to the increase in oil prices. Economic policy is focused on developing Qatar's nonassociated natural gas reserves and increasing private and foreign investment in non-energy sectors, but oil and gas still account for more than 50% of GDP, roughly 85% of export earnings, and 70% of government revenues. Oil and gas have made Qatar the second highest per-capita income country - following Liechtenstein - and the world's second fastest growing - following Macau. Proved oil reserves of 15 billion barrels should enable continued output at current levels for 37 years. Qatar's proved reserves of natural gas exceed 25 trillion cubic meters, about 14% of the world total and third largest in the world. Qatar's successful 2022 world cup bid will likely accelerate large-scale infrastructure projects such as Qatar's metro system and the Qatar-Bahrain causeway. GDP - per capita:&lt;br /&gt;
$145,300 (2010 est.); Country comparison to the world: 1; GDP (official exchange rate): $126.5 billion (2009 est.). Agriculture - products: fruits, vegetables; poultry, dairy products, beef; fish; Industries: liquefied natural gas, crude oil production and refining, ammonia, fertilizers, petrochemicals, steel reinforcing bars, cement, commercial ship repair. Oil - proved reserves:&lt;br /&gt;
25.41 billion bbl (1 January 2010 est.) country comparison to the world: 12   &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theodora.com/wfbcurrent/qatar/qatar_economy.html Qatar Economy 2011, CIA World Factbook.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Map of Qatar Persia Arabia.jpg|thumb|300px|Map of Persia - Arabia, with the adjacent countries, 1855, (detail).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar has been inhabited for millennia. The Al Khalifa family of Bahrain dominated the area until 1868 when, at the request of Qatari nobles, the British negotiated the termination of the Bahraini claim, except for the payment of tribute. The tribute ended when the Ottoman Empire occupied Qatar in 1872. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the Ottomans left at the beginning of World War I, the British recognized Sheikh Abdullah bin Jassim Al Thani as ruler. The Al Thani family had lived in Qatar for 200 years. The 1916 treaty between the United Kingdom and Sheikh Abdullah was similar to those entered into by the British with other Gulf principalities. Under it, the ruler agreed not to dispose of any of his territory except to the U.K. and not to enter into relationships with any other foreign government without British consent. In return, the British promised to protect Qatar from all aggression by sea and to lend their good offices in case of a land attack. A 1934 treaty granted more extensive British protection. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1935, a 75-year oil concession was granted to the Qatar Petroleum Company, a subsidiary of the Iraq Petroleum Company, which was owned by Anglo-Dutch, French, and U.S. interests. High-quality oil was discovered in 1940 at Dukhan, on the western side of the Qatari peninsula. However, the start of WWII delayed exploitation of Qatar's oil resources, and oil exports did not begin until 1949. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Doha Mosque Qatar.jpg|thumb|left|280px|Doha Mosque.]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the 1950s and 1960s gradually increasing oil revenues brought prosperity, rapid immigration, substantial social progress, and the beginnings of Qatar's modern history. When the U.K. announced a policy in 1968 (reaffirmed in March 1971) of ending the treaty relationships with the Gulf sheikdoms, Qatar joined the other eight states then under British protection (the seven trucial sheikdoms—the present United Arab Emirates—and Bahrain) in a plan to form a union of Arab emirates. By mid-1971, as the termination date of the British treaty relationship (end of 1971) approached, the nine still had not agreed on terms of union. Accordingly, Qatar declared independence as a separate entity and became the fully independent State of Qatar on September 3, 1971. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 1972, the Heir Apparent, Sheikh Khalifa bin Hamad, deposed his cousin, Amir Ahmad, and assumed power. Key members of the Al Thani family supported this move, which took place without violence or signs of political unrest. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On June 27, 1995, the Deputy Amir, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa, deposed his father Amir Khalifa in a bloodless coup. An unsuccessful counter-coup was staged in 1996. The Amir and his father are now reconciled, though some supporters of the counter-coup remain in prison. The Amir announced his intention for Qatar to move toward democracy and has permitted a freer and more open press and municipal elections as a precursor to expected parliamentary elections. Qatari citizens approved a new constitution via public referendum in April 2003, which came into force in June 2005. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1996 [[Al Jazeera]] launches the first independent Arab satellite news channel, breaking the monopoly of state controlled media in the region and in 2006 Qatar becomes the world's largest exporter of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and acts as the first Arab host of the Asian Games. [http://www.qatartourism.gov.qa/discover/index/1/207]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.qatartourism.gov.qa/ Qatar tourism.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/qa.html Qatar.] CIA - The World Factbook.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dohaluxury.com/category/qatar-doha-living/ Doha living.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://qatarise.blogspot.com/ Qatar Wakeup Call.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Asian Countries}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Copyright Details (US Government)}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Middle Eastern Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Muslim-Majority Countries]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nuclear_deal_with_Iran&amp;diff=2126412</id>
		<title>Nuclear deal with Iran</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nuclear_deal_with_Iran&amp;diff=2126412"/>
		<updated>2025-05-15T14:37:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Trump:  &amp;quot;sorta&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;President Trump said on May 15, 2025 that Iran had “sort of” agreed to the terms of a peace deal with the United States. [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2025/may/15/donald-trump-says-us-close-nuclear-deal-iran/]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis_trade_rule&amp;diff=2106392</id>
		<title>De minimis trade rule</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis_trade_rule&amp;diff=2106392"/>
		<updated>2025-02-03T14:39:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Tweak Trump tariff quote&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''de minimis trade rule''' permits imports of less than $800 into the United States to avoid tariff payments, except (since early 2025) Mexico, China, and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Trump 47's &amp;quot;first 100 days&amp;quot; he imposed 10% and 25% tariffs on Mexico, China, and Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
The White House said that the purpose of the tariffs is not so much (a) to gain more federal revenue as (b) to change the policy of the affected countries: for one thing, Trump is calling for a crackdown on deadly addictive drugs (specifically [[fentanyl]]). His strategy is to hurt U.S. trading partners enough to make them crack down on smugglers (and on migrants traveling through Mexico). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opponents argue that the only significant effects will be (1) retaliatory tariffs and (2) higher prices for American consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CNBC reported that on Feb 2, 2024, President Trump:&lt;br /&gt;
*. . . signed executive orders imposing tariffs on the country’s top three trading partners. Goods imported from Canada and Mexico will be slapped with a 25% tariff, while goods from China will be charged a 10% tax. Energy resources from Canada will have a lower 10% tariff. The duties are expected to take effect on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
*The orders against China, Canada and Mexico all halt a trade exemption, known as “de minimis,” which allows exporters to ship packages worth less than $800 into the U.S. duty free. [https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/02/trump-tariffs-take-aim-at-trade-loophole-used-by-temu-shein.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis_trade_rule&amp;diff=2106391</id>
		<title>De minimis trade rule</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis_trade_rule&amp;diff=2106391"/>
		<updated>2025-02-03T14:33:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: exceptions for China, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''de minimis trade rule''' permits imports of less than $800 into the United States to avoid tariff payments, except (since early 2025) Mexico, China, and Canada.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Trump 47's &amp;quot;first 100 days&amp;quot; he imposed 10% and 25% tariffs on Mexico, China, and Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
The White House said that the purpose of the tariffs is not so much (a) to gain more federal revenue as (b) to change the policy of the affected countries: for one thing, Trump is calling for a crackdown on deadly addictive drugs (specifically [[fentanyl]]). His strategy is to hurt U.S. trading partners enough to make them crack down on smugglers (and on migrants traveling through Mexico). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opponents argue that the only significant effects will be (1) retaliatory tariffs and (2) higher prices for American consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CNBC reported that:&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump on Saturday signed executive orders imposing tariffs on the country’s top three trading partners. Goods imported from Canada and Mexico will be slapped with a 25% tariff, while goods from China will be charged a 10% tax. Energy resources from Canada will have a lower 10% tariff. The duties are expected to take effect on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
*The orders against China, Canada and Mexico all halt a trade exemption, known as “de minimis,” which allows exporters to ship packages worth less than $800 into the U.S. duty free. [https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/02/trump-tariffs-take-aim-at-trade-loophole-used-by-temu-shein.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis_trade_rule&amp;diff=2106390</id>
		<title>De minimis trade rule</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis_trade_rule&amp;diff=2106390"/>
		<updated>2025-02-03T14:32:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Trump halted a trade exemption which allows exporters to ship packages worth less than $800 into the U.S. duty free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''de minimis trade rule''' permits imports of less than $800 into the United States to avoid tariff payments. &lt;br /&gt;
During Trump 47's &amp;quot;first 100 days&amp;quot; he imposed 10% and 25% tariffs on Mexico, China, and Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
The White House said that the purpose of the tariffs is not so much (a) to gain more federal revenue as (b) to change the policy of the affected countries: for one thing, Trump is calling for a crackdown on deadly addictive drugs (specifically [[fentanyl]]). His strategy is to hurt U.S. trading partners enough to make them crack down on smugglers (and on migrants traveling through Mexico). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opponents argue that the only significant effects will be (1) retaliatory tariffs and (2) higher prices for American consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CNBC reported that:&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump on Saturday signed executive orders imposing tariffs on the country’s top three trading partners. Goods imported from Canada and Mexico will be slapped with a 25% tariff, while goods from China will be charged a 10% tax. Energy resources from Canada will have a lower 10% tariff. The duties are expected to take effect on Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;
*The orders against China, Canada and Mexico all halt a trade exemption, known as “de minimis,” which allows exporters to ship packages worth less than $800 into the U.S. duty free. [https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/02/trump-tariffs-take-aim-at-trade-loophole-used-by-temu-shein.html]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis&amp;diff=2106387</id>
		<title>De minimis</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis&amp;diff=2106387"/>
		<updated>2025-02-03T14:22:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Ed Poor moved page De minimis to De minimis trade rule: longer title is better&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[De minimis trade rule]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis_trade_rule&amp;diff=2106386</id>
		<title>De minimis trade rule</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis_trade_rule&amp;diff=2106386"/>
		<updated>2025-02-03T14:22:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Ed Poor moved page De minimis to De minimis trade rule: longer title is better&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''de minimis trade rule''' permits imports of less than $800 into the United States to avoid tariff payments. &lt;br /&gt;
During Trump 47's &amp;quot;first 100 days&amp;quot; he imposed 10% and 25% tariffs on Mexico, China, and Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
The White House said that the purpose of the tariffs is not so much (a) to gain more federal revenue as (b) to change the policy of the affected countries: for one thing, Trump is calling for a crackdown on deadly addictive drugs (specifically [[fentanyl]]). His strategy is to hurt U.S. trading partners enough to make them crack down on smugglers (and on migrants traveling through Mexico). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opponents argue that the only significant effects will be (1) retaliatory tariffs and (2) higher prices for American consumers.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis_trade_rule&amp;diff=2106385</id>
		<title>De minimis trade rule</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=De_minimis_trade_rule&amp;diff=2106385"/>
		<updated>2025-02-03T14:21:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Trump tariffs and fantanyl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''de minimis trade rule''' permits imports of less than $800 into the United States to avoid tariff payments. &lt;br /&gt;
During Trump 47's &amp;quot;first 100 days&amp;quot; he imposed 10% and 25% tariffs on Mexico, China, and Canada. &lt;br /&gt;
The White House said that the purpose of the tariffs is not so much (a) to gain more federal revenue as (b) to change the policy of the affected countries: for one thing, Trump is calling for a crackdown on deadly addictive drugs (specifically [[fentanyl]]). His strategy is to hurt U.S. trading partners enough to make them crack down on smugglers (and on migrants traveling through Mexico). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opponents argue that the only significant effects will be (1) retaliatory tariffs and (2) higher prices for American consumers.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2106074</id>
		<title>User talk:Ed Poor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2106074"/>
		<updated>2025-02-02T02:53:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Condolences to family of DEI hire woman&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Archive: &lt;br /&gt;
[[/1|1]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/2|2]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/4|4]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/5|5]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/6|6]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/7|7]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/8|8]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/9|9]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/10|10]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/11|11]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/12|12]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/13|13]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/14|14]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/15|15]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/16|16]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/17|17]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/18|18]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ed poor grinning.jpg|right|thumb|114px|Ed Poor on campus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- New comments at the bottom, please. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writing Plan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to submit a writing plan. While I haven't been asked for one, I feel this would best help keep me on task and contribute the most productively. You seem to know an awful lot about this wiki stuff, and I'm still new at it, so if you could help me that would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
I think I'd first like to help contribute to the various book articles around the site by adding in examples of the influence of Christianity, as a lot of books have Christian overtones that aren't currently listed. I'm thinking I'd like to start by drawing parallels between the story of Jesus in the Gospels with One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Please let me know if this would be acceptable.--[[User:JeremiahJ|JeremiahJ]] 18:10, 6 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably not. Please email me a draft. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 17 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor, I have submitted a request [[Talk:Atheism#Addition_of_Information_on_Charity_and_External_Links_Request|here]] but it was never attended to. Could you please have a look at it? Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:19, 28 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Image Upload Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
I am new here. Can you upload these images please.&lt;br /&gt;
https://puresocialnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/PA-Reg-Trends-1024x576.png&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.wikispeedia.org/seth_keshel_photo_2021-07-11_17-39-09.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I create Seth_Keshel page, but today its gone. Not sure how to proceed.&lt;br /&gt;
-James Pruett&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed Poor, I hope this message finds you doing well. I was wondering if you could upload [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Young_Galaxy_Accreting_Material.jpg this image] for use in the article I recently created. I look forward to hearing your response. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:32, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello Ed Poor, could you please add [[Atheism and the suppression of science]] to [[Template:Nb Atheism|this template]]? I really appreciate it! With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:14, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hello Ed Poor, I need two more images for the article I created which are available [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Independent_assortment_%26_segregation.svg here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Lennox.jpg here]. Recently, [[User:JMR10]] uploaded my previous one, for which I am thankful. Could you ask him to do the same for these two or could you please do these for me? I highly appreciate it. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:40, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I seem to have messed up the Ada article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My proxy keeps dropping stuff, so the picture at the top is busted.  Also, I had to cut down the reference, because the captcha can't make it through.  It should have a left bracket, and h,t,t,p, etc., and a right bracket after the &amp;quot;pdf&amp;quot;. I wonder if you could please fix it for me.  I will contact Andy about getting my IP range restored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I was going to put in the talk page (and will do once things get straightened out) is that the two cited articles are very shallow, having only 7 and 3 sentences, respectively.  They both refer to a &amp;quot;plan&amp;quot;, but that's because the word &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been coined in the computer context.  She really was the first person to write &amp;quot;code&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry about this.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:08, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I read her notes, and it doesn't look like a [[computer program]] to me. A charitable view might be that it's a [[specification|spec]], but there's no flowchart and no [[source code]]. Don't be sorry, just get it right. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:21, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What did you expect this &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; to look like?  The term &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; implies both a programming language and &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot; that the source code is assembled or compiled into.  Assemblers, compilers, and programming languages wouldn't be invented for another hundred years (by Grace Murray Hopper, John Backus, and others.)  The same goes for the other accoutrements of modern software development, like flow charts and specifications.  In fact, even the terms &amp;quot;software&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been invented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, assuming that you accept that she had to write &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot;, what would you expect machine code to look like for a machine that reads its instructions with rods poking through holes in large punched cards running around on a track, and does its arithmetic by counting teeth on turning gears?  It wouldn't look much like Intel 586 code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact is, the lines of Ada's written algorithm were intended to be punched into lines of holes in Babbage's cards, once the &amp;quot;analytical engine&amp;quot; was built, which it wasn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, what I was being &amp;quot;sorry&amp;quot; for was not the content of my edit, but the fact that an extremely buggy proxy messed up the article and wouldn't let me fix it, despite several tries.  Andy has been working with me to fix the network problems, and DMorris fixed the broken picture and hyperlink while my access was broken.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 20:39, 6 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then it would be more accurate to say that she described an algorithm. That's not the same as a computer program, even if she was hoping that Babbage's machine might be programmed to carry out the algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An encyclopedia should be precise and unbiased, not used to create &amp;quot;factoids&amp;quot; for use in publicity campaigns, such as promoting [[women in science]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't say she had to write machine code, but rather to be the &amp;quot;first programmer&amp;quot; she would have had to produce a [[computer program]]. If you have seen it, please show it to me. Otherwise, I'm going to make an editorial decision that she produced an algorithm rather than a program. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:18, 7 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Let's say that [[Ada Lovelace]] wrote one of the first comprehensive descriptions of an algorithm to generate [[Bernoulli numbers]]. But until I see the actual sequence of instructions, including [[if-then]] or [[loop control]] statements, I'd hesitate to call it an actual [[computer program]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:17, 17 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The anti-Semitism of liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
I love how libs reveal their true selves.  No matter what we say or do in describing them, they come here just to confirm it all.  So when they want to emphasize &amp;quot;Jew&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;karajou&amp;quot;, I'll be more then happy to get a gold Magen David to wear around my neck, join my brothers and sisters in the synagogue every week, and show everyone else just how hate-filled and intolerant these liberals really are.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:20, 12 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please help! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! I tried to add the information for Edo to the Tokyo article and for some reason,. it stripped a bunch of stuff out when I saved. Now when I try and revert the edit I made, I keep getting a internal server 500 error. Please can you revert for me? [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:19, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's ok, I fixed it! [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:30, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm glad it worked out for you. My Japanese name is &amp;quot;Edo&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:04, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice speed on reverts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You beat me to every one! Nicely done--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:05, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. I'll pass that on to my secret bot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:10, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks for noticing me ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must be doing something right. Every time I mention alternate viewpoints, and no one sees fit to revert my edits, I get vandalism to my talk page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:48, 10 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jeb Bush ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm trying to reorganize the information, not leave it out. If you notice, I'm working on the article quite a bit. May I please revert your revision? [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:05, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sure. I'm frequently too bold and hasty. And that's the wonderful thing about a wiki. Nothing is ever really deleted; it's all in the article history. Go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:09, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technical question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm lobbying for a separate namespace for the Conservapedia Bible Project. The idea is that each verse gets its own ''article'', which can be used rather as a template. I see a couple of advantages:&lt;br /&gt;
*verses can be quoted more easily: instead of copying the whole verse, only a short link (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; ) is neccessary to get a neat result: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*thereby, the use of the CBP is encouraged over other translations.&lt;br /&gt;
*if there is a change in the CBP, the afflicted verses don't have to be tracked down manually, but the change is applied automatically throughout the wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To accomplish this, a new namespace has to be created. That shouldn't be too difficult, as there are only a few exemplary pages prefixed with ''CBP:'' at this moment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But after this, the namespace has to be filled with the existing translated verses. My question: is your bot up to this task?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 10:53, 8 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== madonna ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, please strongly reconsider your desire to create a &amp;quot;kinder article.&amp;quot; In stating that madonna is a person who has changed to being more spiritual you are buying to the liberal media's lies. It sounds like a madonna fan attempting to weave their bias in, which of course you are not. I think you may want to do more research, and read my recent additions as she is still, if not more so, a wicked and hateful person who has sucked millions of children into raunchy culture, dated murderers and mocked our Lord Jesus Christ who gave his life for us. Madonna deserves only the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:14, 14 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And I just had a long conversation with some Wikipedians in Central Park last month, about whether CP is more neutral than WP. Now you want &amp;quot;conservative bias&amp;quot; to denounce [[Madonna Ciccone]]? Not even Wikipedia's BLP policy would allow that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder whether you are a liberal '''tempting me''' to add bias, just so you can accuse us of being biased. Well, if so, I choose not to cooperate, my dear elf. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:45, 14 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Legolas here might be a parodist. Would you mind looking into him? [[User:NickP|NickP]] 00:12, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, your compassion sounds a little misplaced to me. Do you also visit the Fred Phelps, Bernie Madoff, Ted Bundy, and Charles Manson pages asking people for some &amp;quot;Christian charity&amp;quot; to tone those down too? Look into me all you want please. I dislike Madonna because she has mocked our lord Jesus Christ. Conservative people have respect for Christ end of story. The reason society has degraded is by giving raunchy people like madonna a free pass and pity. I'm the one who wants to print the ACTUAL history of madonna that the liberal media has left out such her dating the felon Chris Paciello. I only want the truth about her in the article. Why is that so bad? I thought this was the one place that might allow the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:34, 17 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ed, can you please look into this guy? He is an obvious parodist. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 15:55, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
First of all - Ed is a senior sysop at this site - I don't know why a few of you have taken upon yourself to post on [[User talk:Aschlafly|Andy's talk page]] when Ed is more than capable of dealing with an alleged parodist on his own. Secondly, just because he is posting radical things on a talk page does not make him a parodist. Looking at his contributions, you ''could'' argue that he is edit warring, but since Ed is simultaneously the user in the revert war and an admin, it is up to his judgement as to whether or not a block is deserving. Your collective alarmism has now spread across three talk pages. That's enough.--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 16:00, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::@NickP, your very.... quick to call somebody else a parodist. Why not leave that to the pro.'s to decide?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:06, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Several others have also pointed out the fact that he acts very suspicious. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:13, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Saying he &amp;quot;acts suspicious&amp;quot; and saying he's a 100% no way im wrong about this Parodist is two completely different things.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:16, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I prefer what Wikipedia old-timers used to call &amp;quot;soft security&amp;quot;. Just help me fix the articles in question. Everything will sort itself out. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:34, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==EdBot==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I left three (actually six) problem Categories that need some sort of merging at [[User_talk:EdBot]]. Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, EdBot did not survive the MediaWiki upgrades. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:21, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Does that mean it's all got to be done manually? Moving 200 entries into another Category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Only if they really have to be moved. (Meanwhile, if anyone has an idea how a bot can &amp;quot;log in&amp;quot; with the new MediaWiki software, let me know.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot#Logging_in This] should help. Indeed, the whole [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot page] is quite interesting. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:40, 19 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A request concerning recent events ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm very sorry to come to you with this, but I honestly don't know where else to turn at this point.  You have always struck me as the voice of reason and level-headedness here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply put: the current altercation on Andy's talk page is out of control.  I recognize that I have no authority to tell sysops what they should or shouldn't do, but it seems to me that basic common courtesy calls for not filling up Andy's talk page with arguments and accusations.  Moreover, the very public nature of the dispute is encouraging other users to join in.  Some of them are doubtless sincere; others, I suspect, may in fact be parodists seeking to fan the flames (I notice a LOT of recently created accounts.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless, the fact remains that Andy's talk page has been turned into a general forum for accusations and arguments.   At this point, it's degenerated to the level where people are making absolutely vicious personal attacks against certain of the participants.  (Kudos to JamesWilson for promptly reverting the most egregious of these.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know the other sysops better than most of us; you talk to them; I would certainly hope they trust and respect your opinion.  Is there anything you can do to persuade them to take a step back, cool down, and wait for Andy to respond at this point?  Everyone involved has made their positions clear; further acrimony can serve no useful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry to trouble you with this, but I really feel that this is both inconsiderate to Andy and deleterious to the Conservapedia project as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:05, 28 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the vote of confidence, but shouldn't I check with Andy before barging in? It may be that he prefers to let everyone air their opinions. It is not just his courage but his wisdom and compassion that attracted me to this project. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:59, 5 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[User:MRellek]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, per the site owner, Administrators [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Guidelines&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=892763 &amp;quot;instructions...are to be followed&amp;quot;] is no longer operable. I have emailed you a copy of Mr. Schlafly's approval.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, sorry. I was hasty. Feel free to unban MRellek, if you feel I was out of line. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, Ed. I'm trying to get the other sysops to do more warnings &amp;amp; shorter blocks; let's get a sense of community here. After all, we've known many of these editors (the RW neighbors) for several years now.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:37, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel. I invited someone to edit Conservapedia and they were blocked and they should not have been. I got the block overturned. So I think there is room for improvement in Conservapedia's blocking policy. You can sign up [[User:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. I invited active Syops/Admins plus people with blocking rights who might wish to be Sysops. If I left anyone out, please let them know about the panel.  The people with blocking rights can sign up [[User talk:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. The panel will probably convene when Iduan is back from his summer vacation or fairly soon afterwards.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:47, 13 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think I got signed up somehow, after jumping into a discussion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can we have non-sysops on the panel? I'd like to invite a friend from Wikipedia to join it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:00, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== If I understand correctly, you are the local math expert. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If so, maybe you can take a look at [[Relativistic mass|this]] and some of that editor's other contributions. They seem pretty obscure/specialized for the general reader, to me, at least. Thanks! [[User:MrMorganH|MrMorganH]] 10:15, 14 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not an expert, but I know a lot about high school math. Andy's brother knows much more than I do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:55, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Revert ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good morning (afternoon?) Ed, why was my comment reverted? I can't see why it should be? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:54, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gosh, you're quick on the trigger. See your talk page for my response. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:58, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I am indeed quick on the trigger, I like Westerns you see..:-)  I have responded to you on my talk-page and re asked the question in a more cordial manner. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:59, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Conservapedia  Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings have begun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel proceeding have begun here:  [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings]] You can start making your edits to the page should you wish to do so.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:59, 17 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Farewell ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, in all sincerity you are by far the most interesting person I have met at Conservapedia.  I regret that we couldn't get along better, though we did manage to improve a number of things.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:12, 18 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We'd have gotten along better if we more goals in common. Building a trustworthy encyclopedia apparently was not one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=893745 this drive by attack] you dodged my request for specific instances of the problem you complained of. (Note: saying &amp;quot;all of them&amp;quot; is a a typical liberal dodge. That's like global warming alarmists saying, &amp;quot;Just look at the temperature record; the evidence is all there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For those listening in to this fascinating drama, the difference between real science and liberal junk science is that real scientists provide examples of what they're talking about, so that anyone can check it out and see for themselves. Liberals and other pseudoscientists '''pretend''' that they've already made the point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It reminds me of Japan, which always (1) says that it &amp;quot;already apologized&amp;quot; for the [[comfort women]] episode while steadfastly (2) refusing ever to admit that it did anything wrong. They are hoping we'll all be too polite to mention that #1 contradicts #2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice try on the parting shot, but your pretense of trying oh so hard fools no one. You're always welcome to come back if you '''ever''' choose to help this project instead of undermining it with trickery. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pontiac==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for your help archiving my page.  I know you are very experienced with Wikis, but I was wondering why you removed what I wrote about the government shut down of Pontiac destroying American history.  A lot of people were really upset about Pontiac's closure and there are lots of websites and articles proving this, why can't it be in the article?  I will differ to your judgement because you are so experienced, but just want to understand your reasoning. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 22:46, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can't be in the article until you find a way to make it trustworthy. Use references. You can't just write stuff off the top of your head, because you are not an established author. You are in fact an anonymous person, and we don't even know whether Craig is your real name. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If there's a lot of proof for your assertion, be sure to provide references, like:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The New York Times reported that after GM was taken over by the government, brands like Saturn and Pontiac were sold or eliminated (link and/or date)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you need help formatting references, lots of people here can help. But '''you''' must supply them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:43, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Pictures==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, how do I add pictures?  --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 16:08, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can't add pictures, until you've made enough useful contributions to earn upload rights. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:34, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In addition, Craig, you can use [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]] until you earn uploading privileges. A Sysop will do it for you.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 21:59, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll work even harder to earn my rights!   I also wanted to apologize for being so familiar, my mom pointed out that I should be calling you Mr. Poor. I always call adults by their last names in real life, but on the internet I usually forget.  Also thanks Mr. Wilson for your advice about upload requests. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 13:24, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::No worries. I wouldn't mind if you called me James or Jim, but I'm glad your mother has taught you well. Also, you will need a lot more work to earn uploading privileges, just so you know. Happy editing in the meantime!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 14:21, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit conflict ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just got edit conflicted by you on the Morse code page - what are the odds we'd both be working on it! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:19, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One thought leads to another ... not such long odds. Sorry about stepping on your work. Feel free to revert, and I'll recover later. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Its all OK, I added my work to your version. Great minds think alike, more like an average mind in my case but you catch my drift...:-) [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:24, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== signature ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you don't mind, but I borrowed the format of your signature to use for my own. It's simple and to the point, but looks nice as well, so I thought I would use it as well. Thank you! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:02, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I copied mine from someone else, so &amp;quot;[[Pay It Forward]].&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:27, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, ok. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:23, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== like wikipedia? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i looked up [[milk]] and [[butter]] how is this conserivtive? is it like wikipedia at all what can i add? ty. --[[User:Rainbowboiz|Rainbowboiz]] 00:35, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not unless your spelling improves. And we are not so much &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; as [[trustworthy]]. Unlike Wikipedia, we really do try to avoid political bias. Add anything that is correct and useful. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:17, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meat Loaf ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know his stage name is much better known (I'm writing the article on him, obviously), but wouldn't you think using the subject's real name is more appropriate for an encyclopedia? If you think the article should be titled under his stage name, you're the boss, but I thought I might want to point that out. Thanks!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 11:14, 1 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me as I am fairly new to this wiki.  I have attempted to propose a discussion for deletion on this particular page.  Before disccussing this, I have followed the instructions on templates via the help index [[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Articles_for_deletion]] to add it to a discussion for deletion but this does not seem to work so I have not proceded further - with hindsight I should have guessed there was something wrong by the lack of entries on this page.  &lt;br /&gt;
My reason for wishing to commence this discussion is that I suspect the article (created by a user who does not appear to have an active talk page) seems to me to be parody and trolling to debase the credibility of this project.  In my opinion, most of the logic followed in nearly every assertion is spurious and often uses blatant synthesis that a ten year old could question.  It is to such an extent that I don't think an &amp;quot;improved&amp;quot; version would be posible.  Of course, others may have different oppinions which is why I am trying to be fair and open it for rational discussion.  What is the correct procedure?  Thank you in advance - answer to my talk page [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 19:54, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure what the correct procedure is. Maybe you could post on the talk page, showing a few examples of &amp;quot;spurious&amp;quot; assertions. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:46, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok I can do this, but I'm surprised that hte Help feature supplies a redundant page on discoussing articles for deletion.  I was also under the impression that you had Sysop/Admin powers and would be familiar with such policies as it is a feature on other wikis.  [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 13:31, 8 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually I know policy fairly well and do have Sysop/Admin powers. Either provide the requested examples, or drop the matter. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:47, 10 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sid 3050 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sid 3050 was blocked for three month for ''trolling''. The only edit he made during the day before his block seems to be to answer to your question in a section above (''So, will it go away if you ignore it?'') - see his [[Special:Contributions/Sid 3050|list of contributions]]. You had personally addressed this comment (''But I'll take a look at Sid's material below now, just to be a good sport.''), so you should be able to judge whether such a comment is ''trolling''. Could you please review Sid's block? In a timely fashion? Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 09:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sid was trolling. Whether this justifies a three month block is up to the admin in question. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm always open to suggestions for making Conservapedia more trustworthy. If you have anything specific in mind, please speak up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of particular interest to me would be any material relating to the contrast between conservative and liberal viewpoints on American political issues, as well as philosophy, religion and science. To my regret, repeated invitations to include users who are ideological opponents of this project have not met with an enthusiastic response. It's almost as if they wish to conceal their ideological differences; ironically, this could be seen as self-censorship. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If anyone wants to describe liberal POV here they may, provided only that it is clearly labeled as such - not presented as gospel. This should not be an onerous requirement: it's the same as Wikipedia's NPOV policy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:42, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Help! A user called CortA is currently vandalising articles. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:15, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, Andy blocked him. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misled by RonLar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was quite astonished by your last actions. I slept over it and want to clarify my earlier remark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd appreciate if you would be less generous with your slight innuendos (''&amp;quot;thanks for nothing!&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;misled by RonLar&amp;quot;''): these make it difficult to assume ''good faith'' on your side. And they have the annoying tendency to backfire...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*my statement ''&amp;quot;Where is the right place to propose an alternative viewpoint? Surely not in the article itself, but on its talk-page. This is a simple necessity for all protected articles, but a good idea for most of those articles some sysops feel strongly about.&amp;quot;'' is hardly misleading - even though it is not written by a native speaker! In fact, it is echoing the sentiments of Conservapedia's [[Conservapedia:Editing etiquette|editing etiquettes]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should discuss changes made by an Administrator before reverting their edits. Administrators are charged with seeing that article content is in line with Conservapedia guidelines. [[Edit war]]ring with an Administrator usually results in a temporary block.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should not alter the editorial content of an article away from a [[conservative]], or [[Christian]], or [[family friendly]] &amp;quot;tone&amp;quot; without discussing proposed changes on the talk page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'''Never make substantial edits to an article without discussing your changes first on the talk page. If you have a reasonable expectation that other editors will accept your change(s), the changes are just formatting / copy editing, you should proceed.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inserting an alternative viewpoint is most certainly a ''substantial edit'' - and the etiquettes advise you to discuss such an edit at first on the talk-page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So, I made a true statement, in accordance with Conservapedia's policy on editing, and you '''misread''' it. To reiterate: You weren't '''misled''', you simply '''misread''' it. And this misunderstanding (of your part) you took as a reason to erase the whole section and seemingly not to read the rest of my comment? Deleting a section on censorship is always a little bit ironic...  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*BTW: whether the article is protected or not is not of any interest for the discussion of censorship! A library does not only censor the books it throws from it shelves, but the books it doesn't allow into it shelves in the first place!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I put the whole section up [[User:RonLar|here]], so you can read it carefully again. Take your time, but nevertheless, react timely - you said that  would be important....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 12:05, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:At this point, I think it's become abundantly clear that complaining about censorship will get you nowhere.  I realize users will come up and be frustrated by certain site traditions, but that's just the way Conservapedia is run, RonLar.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 13:41, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry, I thought you were saying the article was protected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I'm astonished to think that you consider adding alternative viewpoints to be something that has to be '''cleared''' with a sysop first. My understanding of project policy is that all contributors are free to describe non-conservative, non-Christian views ... especially on an article describing a controversy between the two sides. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:38, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Apology accepted. Perhaps you could revert your reaction to this misunderstanding by reintroducing the section which you erased from your talk-page?&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please read [[User:RonLar#Again, the previous example of ideological censorship, in detail]] - all of it, not only the first sentence. This should answer some of your questions.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please address the incident which I mentioned there.&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 16:56, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Eh? I thought you wanted help. Please answer my question: Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:39, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::How is it a sensible use of my time to answer new questions  when you seem to ignore my answers to your old ones? Please remember your statements:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Unless you can show at least one diff, where a senior editor censored something ... merely because it disagreed with some conservative shibboleth ... than you ought to stop saying this. I address this not so much to you, as to those who follow you or travel alongside you.'' }}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::and&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''I asked for an instance of ideological censorship.''}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, you find it here: [[User:RonLar#Again.2C_the_previous_example_of_ideological_censorship.2C_in_detail]] Of course I am willing to answer any question concerning this specific example of censorship, especially those which indicate that you read the whole comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 02:41, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nearly two weeks later: Did you take a look? Or even better, did you read the whole thing? [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 18:17, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-Clancy cracks? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general I'm a Clancy fan but I think some of the criticism you removed was valid. For example by the time he wrote &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; his standards of research had perceptibly dropped (The AH-64 has a 20mm gun? Really?) and &amp;quot;Red Rabbit&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Teeth of the Tiger&amp;quot; were frankly rubbish. Maybe some of the criticisms should stay? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:09, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Anything can stay if properly sourced: X said Y about Z. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:10, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What would be an acceptable source? I have all Clancy's books; would they be acceptable sources for pointing out declining standards of technical accuracy? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:20, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::LOL, '''your''' interpretation of Clancy's writings would be (what is called at Wikipedia) original research. If you don't know what I meant by 'properly sourced', then you're unqualified to contribute anything further to this project. If you do know, you're just toying with me. Godspeed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough. What I'd do is reference both Clancy's books and technical sources that contradict them, such as the fact that the AH-64 does NOT have a 20mm gun. Like I said I'm generally a Clancy fan - &amp;quot;Without Remorse&amp;quot; may just be the best thriller ever written - but his last few books have been a bit disappointing and his research has definitely slipped. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:28, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What I would propose is to remove the comments about &amp;quot;The sum of all fears&amp;quot; - a nuclear weapon could be built with a table saw and a small lathe, never mind optical milling equipment - but keep and expand on the comment about the declining level of technical accuracy. The divergence of the Ryanverse from reality isn't important because it IS fiction, but the declining level of research and tendency towards unrealistic assessments of real-world capabilities IS important. For example &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; is utterly unrealistic even in the Ryanverse. If China invaded Russia they'd get about ten feet over the border before being annihilated. The fortifitions on the Sino-Russian border make the Maginot line look like a sand castle on the beach, and they were actually designed by strategic thinkers. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:44, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On second thought, maybe I'm being too hard on you. I recently started tutoring schoolchildren, and I'm learning to be more patient with their quaint notions. After all, making wrong guesses and getting them corrected is often the best way to learn. Shall I not condescend to grant you the same grace? ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've read all Tom Clancy's [[Jack Ryan]] and [[John Clark]] novels. I always assumed that any discrepancies were inserted on purpose; Clancy certainly would have no reason to put correct information on how to make a suitcase-sized nuclear bomb in his books: what conservative would want to inspire a copycat crime? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to include &amp;quot;criticism&amp;quot; by some published author who says an attack helicopter does or does not have a certain sized gun, go ahead. He's also not very accurate about the software used in the stock market, although it was a key plot element in ''[[Debt of Honor]]''. (Come to think of it, if a man knew everything and wanted to make money betting on horse races, he would know not to put all his winnings on the next race (&amp;quot;[[John Doe]]&amp;quot; TV series pilot). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:56, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Language ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Big_Bang_theory Language like this] makes me extremely uncomfortable: &amp;quot;when grownups talk&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;woman's logic is strange, don't you think&amp;quot;, etc. (especially this in his earlier statements: &amp;quot;and being educated briefly by my grandpa in matters &amp;quot;of faith&amp;quot;, mostly about &amp;quot;Catholic errors&amp;quot;, and the absolute need to be trufhful, my concern was that the Catholics are wrong on one more point since the Big Bang was proven wrong in 1985&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I am not a woman. My identity is very well known and I am quite easy to find. Ottava means eight, and Ottava Rima means Eight Rhyme, a type of rhyming pattern used in Italian epic poetry. Second, his language is condescending, misogynistic, religiously bigoted, etc. Third, his claims about the Big Bang Theory are rather strange, conspiratorial, and nothing I have ever heard by any legitimate scientist. I cannot honestly believe that he is a real conservative but I believe he is a plant just like many of the people who vandalize. His job is to produce some of the most absurd stuff to try and make conservatives look awful. If I am wrong, I am wrong, but his language does not seem like something that is appropriate. I talked to Geoff Plourde about this quite a bit tonight because it bothered me a lot. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:44, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Um ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism and obesity]] - is this a joke? It seems to be just a list of fat atheists. It even has random tidbits like &amp;quot;Chuck Norris endorses the Total Gym exercise system.[59]&amp;quot; I know many priests who are overweight, and many religious people who are. I know many atheists who are ultra thing and anorexic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Christian and Library of Congress researcher's explanations of reports of UFOs &amp;quot; How would that even deal with atheism and obesity? Yet it is in there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page looks like it was created to make Conservapedia and conservatism look really bad. Sigh. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:58, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:User:Conservative is good at attracting readership to this website. The [[Atheism and obesity]] seems to me a bit of payback for the liberals who call Rush Limbaugh a big, fat idiot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And in his payback, he demeans everyone who is overweight, including myself. I've dealt with mean-spirited behavior from people about weight the majority of my life - there is no acceptable reason for being hostile about the issue. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 16:53, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== You were looking for ideological censorship? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bestiality&amp;amp;curid=88619&amp;amp;diff=920267&amp;amp;oldid=920266 easy to find] --[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 23:52, 23 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not as easy as you say. See [[Talk:Bestiality]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:44, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Senior Admin assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, I would like to bring something to your attention as a senior administrator. I have been in private communication with User:SamCoulter over the last few weeks. There is nothing in his attitude and comments to me in private and his behaviour here on Conservapedia to suggest this user is anything but sincere. He was recently blocked for the edit [http://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/SamCoulter here] (the last edit he made - I will not link directly to it because the topics are extremely offensive and not family friendly). For this effort he was blocked for three months. His edit was a) relevant b) correct according to the article linked and c) was a link which was on the front page already. It seems that some users wanted to quote the article without implying the articles conclusions as they were at loggerheads with a users personal opinion. I don't think the user should have been blocked but now he is I won't remove it but I do believe that 3 months is extremely heavy-handed. I don't want to create controversy so I will not chnage the block myself but I am bringing this up with you and User:Karajou also (I am unable to contact the blocking sysop). Thank you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:11, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Keep him blocked. He vandalized twice. In fact, I am going to increase the time blocked. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:02, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Do you have evidence of this vandalism? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:04, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If you want to defend those recent contributions be my guest. If you want to wrangle with me about them, it is not going to happen. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I tell you now '''there was no vandalism''' you are blocking a user for adding sourced and factual material. You are blocking him for no reason! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but it's actually very easy to avoid a block. I suggest you start coaching new users about courtesy, project goals, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I myself disagree with the project goals of RW, but they haven't given me any long blocks. Why? Because I follow their rules in their house.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adolescents often have trouble figuring out what the rules are, or trouble realizing the benefits of following them. (In the long run, civil disobedience campaigns against beneficial institutions such as Democracy and Free Markets simply backfire.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:52, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I respectfully disagree with you. It's incredibly ''easy'' to get blocked on this site, because honestly, it appears to depend on the whim of the blocking editor (doesn't like what's being said because it's contrary to the blocking editor's opinion, got up on the wrong side of the bed, had a fight with someone in real life and are taking it out on editors here at CP.) You yourself just handed out an ''infinite'' block for ''defending'' someone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Many editors, myself included, have protested User:Conservative's articles and his method of defending them. If anyone objects, he automatically deems them an atheist/evolutionist, etc., which at least in my case, is far from the truth. I object to several things. First, his use of &amp;quot;obese&amp;quot; as a ''ad hominem'' attack against people whose ideas he disagrees with. I've dealt with bullying behavior about weight most of my life, and have tried to point out to him how hurtful his taunts are, but he thinks it's amusing, and the other sysops here (yourself included) appear to agree. I'm all for a good discussion about ''ideas'', but when the attacks become personal, and all-inclusive, then yes, I'm going to protest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Second, most of the articles are just ''badly, badly written''. They meander ''miles'' away from the original topic, they tend to be a bunch of quotes lumped together, and in many of them, the point that he's trying to make is missed completely. The actual subjects might be valid, and important enough to warrent an article on them, but creating 10 articles that say the same thing, and that can (and should) be consolidated into one, '''''well-researched and well-written document''''', is just poor scholarship. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:53, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, thank you for not giving me an excuse to block you! ;-) Very well written . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As I've said elsewhere, [http://ameriwiki.wikkii.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;amp;diff=4073&amp;amp;oldid=4071] I disagree with the stance of &amp;quot;the admin&amp;quot; who is making ''[[ad hominem]]'' attacks on atheists; I think it's a misguided attempt to attract readership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If anyone's had a '''good''' edit reverted for a bad reason, they can just let me know. Just remember: if anyone is criticizing to condemn, I'm not interested, but if they want me to change things, I'm the man who can do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:03, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BrentH's block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see you blocked BrentH for trolling and reverted 2 of his edits. He linked [[Professor]] to an existing article here on CP, [[Professor values]]. Why was that trolling? --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 19:55, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps prior edits?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 20:01, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::User: Ed Poor did not appreciate the section right above this one--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 21:14, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::BrentH made a perfectly reasonable and respectful suggestion. It would appear from the edit history that he was referring to an article about Winona Ryder, created by Ed Poor, which contained one piece of trivia but no basic information regarding the person whatsoever. What BrentH said is simply common sense, and I too cannot see how this can justify a block. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 22:45, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Indeed, certain longstanding members of this community seem to have rather thin skin.  I did not see BrentH's post as offensive or out of line--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 22:54, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This is an encyclopedia. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You wrote that on my talkpage. ''This is an encyclopedia.''. Well, if it is articles like [[bestiality and Britain]] ahould be deleted because, as I have pointed out numerous times, it has nothing to do with bestiality and Britain. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:27, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Article deleted. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=delete&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1]&lt;br /&gt;
::Hey thanks Ed. Just for the record though I wasn't &amp;quot;bothered&amp;quot; by the content so much as bothered by the ''lack'' of content. As the commandments say - everything must be true and verifiable which that article clearly wasn't. Many thanks. I must admit - I have a lot of respect for you and karajou. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ed, evolution was birthed in Britain and secularism has grown rampant in their country. Now their society is a mess and there is rioting in the streets. In addition, the'' Guardian'' just published a puff piece on bestiality. I say enough is enough and it's time their moral rot is exposed. I realize that pointing out that folly and consequences of atheism/evolutionism annoys liberals, but so what. Not only are they grossly and obviously in error, but atheists/evolutionists have shown themselves [[Atheism and cowardice|to be timid little bunnies]]. I restored the article because I feel confident that Conservapedia can stand up to foolish and timid little bunnies. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:21, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Enough with the insults conservative. I am neither a liberal nor an atheist and am sick to death of you accusing me of such. The article has nothing, I repeat '''nothing''' about the practice in Britain. I say again '''nothing'''. You poor scholarship is on show and we can ''all'' see it. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:02, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ed, a Brit was trying to bring over his deviant farming practices to the United States as can be seen [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7600523/British-man-51-arrested-at-bestiality-farm.html HERE]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:28, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::You misread the article, Conservative. The Oregon farm is owned by an American. The British man was visiting it. Read [http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-seattle/seattle-convicted-cocaine-smuggler-arrested-likely-into-bestiality-liking-sex-with-animals here] for a version of the story that makes who owned the farm clearer. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keldaby goats.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|An exclusive British art gallery was criticised for displaying a highly offensive bestiality oriented painting which featured a [[goat]] just yards from The Ritz hotel and where it could be seen by children.- The Daily Mail online (MailOnline), August 5, 2011 ''The explicit art that shows bestiality with a goat just yards from The Ritz'']]&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::There is no way I'd let children any where this site with Conservatives despicable articles all over the place. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Max, I heard Oregon was pretty liberal. It figures the farm was in Oregon. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:30, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::I heard that most states are pretty liberal... But that doesn't make the rumors true. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 22:34, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Oregon voted for Obama plus fairly recently they had the most atheists per capita in the United States. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:57, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Omaha, Nebraska also voted for obama but calling it liberal is very silly--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:58, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/new-poll-identifies-most-liberal-and-conservative-states/ Oregon is liberal] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:07, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm slightly confused as to why it's relevant or not that Oregon is liberal. After all the state DOES have a law against bestiality, so that argues against liberals being tolerant of it. --[[User:ColSharp|ColSharp]] 08:33, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Since when do liberals obey the laws on the books in the first place? This photo [http://www.conservapedia.com/File:1915b7ec753fa9d0352885dc23da4469.jpg] is proof that liberals have no intention of obeying laws regarding littering.  They trashed Washington D.C. ''when they got their way'', January 20, 2009.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:10, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's a law in New Jersey about recycling, yet I know several conservatives who refuse to recycle. Why is this? [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 13:26, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request for Admin assistance  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To all senior admins and sysops. I am being repeatedly abused by user:conservative who, among other things, accuses me continuously of being an atheist simply because I point out some of the holes in his articles. See [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;curid=113357&amp;amp;diff=924642&amp;amp;oldid=924636 here for the latest accusation]. I have asked him numerous times to desist with his sneering name calling as I find it offensive to have my faith questioned and nothing is ever done. He state’s I am atheist because I don’t agree with some of his ridiculous contentions. In actual fact it isn’t even that I disagree with him it is that I point out his shoddy research, poor scholarship and his berating, insulting and sarcastic behaviour towards others. I am of the opinion now that he is purposely calling me names because he knows I don’t like it which is unchristian, impolite and, above all, insulting. Is anyone going to teach this man some manners? Has Conservapedia become a place where Conservative is allowed to behave this way without any warning or comeuppance but all other editors and warned and blocked for minor infractions.  He is in continual violation of the commandments yet NOTHING is done whereas people like myself are always watching out to avoid being banned. Well, fine, ban me if you like. I probably will be after this posting and no doubt Conservative will cackle with glee at “winning” again. But laugh Conservative, you win nothing. I post this is full knowledge that I might be blocked banned and insulted by you in my absence and I have always remained polite and civil plus I can hold my head up high. Hopefully one of you will take a stand and insist on standards of civility. But I don’t hold out much hope. Thanks, many of you were kind, decent people whom I enjoyed working with and I pray for you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:21, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I am disappointed in you most of all Ed. Coming from wikipedia and being the first to jump on others for incivility you ignore when it comes to the ruling chaste of Conservapedia. You should be ashamed. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:48, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Max, I think you assume entirely too much about my dispositions.  You really don't know what extent I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; or if I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; at all. You also don't know what value I place on &amp;quot;winning&amp;quot;. In fact, you don't even know if I am one person or a team.  I/we remain inscrutable. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:24, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::User:Conservative, this is getting silly. You wrote for instance:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::''Actually KhalidM, I have a very outgoing personality and a university professor friend of mine told me that I would make a great administrator because I can be very diplomatic. While I realize that I will never cultivate a large atheist or liberal fan club, I can live with that. Conservative 20:34, 5 October 2011 (EDT) ''&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, while your grammatical gender may be undetermined, your number isn't. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:44, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== King George I ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article of [[King George I]] was deleted as a ''creation of vandals''. On the talk page I read the comment of User:RJJense: ''I added much new text, all of which I wrote, and previously posted on Citizendium.'' I looked up the article at Citizendium and it seemed to be quite informative - certainly not vandalistic! Could it be restored? I'd like to insert a valid link into [[elector]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I restored the last version by RJJense. I feel confident that his last version was a good article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:34, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks - it really seems so! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;New Ordeal&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I noticed that you placed the quotation marks around the term &amp;quot;New Ordeal.&amp;quot; As you have probably noticed I have been attempting to fix that article. Quite frankly, the article is pretty bad to start with and several of the references that prior authors cited have nothing to do with the topic. Do you know if there is procedure in which this article may be recommended for deletion? --[[User:Padams|Padams]] 15:33, 15 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Better to mark it as an essay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, 19 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block of AugustO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I looked at [[Conservapedia:Editor's_guide#If_you_get_blocked]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you get blocked, it's probably because you (1) broke the rules and (2) ignored hints, requests and/or warnings. So the first thing you should do is review your communications with others here, particularly those who are admins. Have you been trying to get along by following our practices and supporting our goals, or have you been trying to change our ways? If you are new here, it's best to go along to get along. After you have contributed a lot, we'll be more likely to listen to your suggestions, but breaking the rules will just end up with eliminating you from the project. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I can't think of any rule which I broke&lt;br /&gt;
::*I was requested to ''to do some charitable work somewhere instead''. I'm already engaged in such work, so this doesn't apply...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't try to ''change our ways''. I try to correct factual errors (e.g.,  ιδού can be translated as ''at this moment'' or that it is right to call ''Carolus Martellus'' the grandson of ''Carolus Magnus''.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Perhaps upon reflection you may realize that you'd rather be part of the project than insist on your own way. You might want to apologize and get unblocked. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't insist on my own way and I apologize if anyone feels insulted by my criticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you want to discuss your block, '''do not create a new account'''. Rather, use one of the following methods to appeal the decision (listed in order of preference). ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Here, I obviously failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. ''Contact the person who blocked you (see below).&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
2. ''If you get no reply after a reasonable amount of time, you may contact any Administrator.&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
3. ''Email cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com giving the name of the Administrator or editor who blocked you, and the date, and it will be forwarded on to them. &lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you contact more than one person about this, please do them the courtesy of letting them know who else you have tried contacting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
::*This should be obvious from the header of my emails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Contacting an Administrator or editor can usually be done by one of the following methods: ''&lt;br /&gt;
*''Use the &amp;quot;Email this user&amp;quot; link in the toolbox. This, however, will only work if both you and the Administrator or editor have enabled this on your/their respective accounts.&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Administrator or editor may have provided an email address or other contact information (e.g. AIM) on their user page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*This section seems to be obsolete: ''email this user'' doesn't work for any of the administrators I tried to reach. And I couldn't get Ed Poor's email address via his user page. So we are in a [[Catch 22]] kind of situation...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I emailed to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;aschlafy@aol.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;conservapedia@zoho.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. I didn't get any reply (is 1-2 days a ''reasonable amount of time'' to wait? I thinks so...) to my short email which stated: ''I understand that my criticisms of CBP and the World History Lectures are quite unwelcome, but they are hardly trolling! I'd appreciate if you lift my block.''&lt;br /&gt;
::*So I decided to create a new account to appeal the block, hoping that the advice against this action is as obsolete as other sections of the ''editor's guide''.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 07:56, 26 October 2011 (EDT) (AugustO)&lt;br /&gt;
:::August, I think you should start a career in sales. You certainly have the persistence to be a good salesman. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:47, 26 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed Poor, the block of AugustO is now more than a week old. I tried to reach you via various channels - could you please lift the block as the stated reason (&amp;quot;trolling&amp;quot;) doesn't apply? [[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 11:09, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please get a [[writing plan]] from him and get it to me, and I'll consider it. Meanwhile, any sysop is free to unblock him. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:01, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Is that any official Sysop, or anyone with Block rights? I'd be happy to unblock Mr O so that he can post his writing plan.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:25, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::On second thoughts, perhaps I'll just go ahead. Please reverse my action if I'm overstepping the mark.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:33, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thanks for the unblock!&lt;br /&gt;
*I read the article on the [[writing plan]], and I'll try to provide you with one. This would be easier if a ''sample plan'' were provided. But nonetheless, here it is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mainly I'm interested in the CBP. Mind you, I'm not ''Junker Jörg'', I'm not capable to create a translation on my own which stands for hundreds of years. But I think that translating the Bible in a group, and extensively discussing your work is a marvelous way to get a greater insight into the ''Book of books''.  While doing so, I try to dig into what Conservative calls the ''ANE culture'', as you can see [[Talk:John_1-7_(Translated)#Issue_with_translation_of_John_4:53|here]], where I try to shed light on timekeeping during the Roman empire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I came here, I thought that there would be a group of likewise interested individuals, but at the moment there seems to be only one other editor with similar interests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As my approach to the CBP generates quite a few edits on talk-pages, I balance these with edits to articles. These tend to by connected somehow with my namesakes (August of Saxony, Ernest August of Hanover), the history - or just happen on pages where I read something which puzzled me :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:21, 8 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion issue ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be a great idea to merge the articles. In fact, if you were interested in expanding the article, I might be interested in helping.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:28, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please help me organize this. We should give prominence to conservative views, but let's steer away from censoring liberal views. It would be nice if liberals could see '''why''' conservatives believe differently. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:43, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::OK!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:48, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged the articles and added a bit on abortion and political ideology. How is it?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:53, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks for the change but==&lt;br /&gt;
perhaps it should be bed bugs (plural), and now when i make an edit and it goes thru, if i try to make another one i get &amp;quot;Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it&amp;quot; but no one has. Going back to page and trying anew results in the same. 3.1: longetivity should be longevity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus is Lord, thanks[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 07:58, 5 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback here ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback [http://conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Panel_members.2C_please_give_your_feedback_below HERE]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your assistance would be much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:05, 16 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have explained my ideas in private email to you and Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:50, 11 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  a few messages to you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few messages to you here: http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Air_superiority [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:14, 26 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for picking up some of my &amp;quot;wiki litter&amp;quot; that I left behind (redirects to non-existent pages). I will try to be more diligent as far as not littering in the future. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:22, 11 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. And don't bother yourself: it's better for you to focus your time on building the wiki, while less talented contributors like myself do the routine housekeeping. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If I had your writing skill, I'd be making whole article like you do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:34, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A message to you from Cipe ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixing a MediaWiki message: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you perform the edit I described [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;oldid=992864#Edit_request here, on very bottom of the page]? I asked Aschlafly but he's probably busy now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 15:33, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know the basics of Wiki coding and not the advanced level coding. I would ask someone else. Try Ed Poor. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:32, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unfortunately, I cannot edit Ed's talk page. Could you suggest someone different? Or message him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The change is rather small and requires only copy-and-paste. More directly: you can copy contents of this: [[User:Cipe/MW_fix]] to: [[MediaWiki:Revision-info]]. Even if my suggestion is wrong, it can be reverted, so there is no danger. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 16:41, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, I did it. But where can I see the results? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:53, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you very much. You'll see it when checking older revision. Here is an example: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that MediaWiki has a different message when you're checking current revision. I'll prepare fix in a moment. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 17:55, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The message seems to have logged me out. I think it needs fixing. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:56, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I also got logged out, but only once. I can consistently see the new message now. Perhaps the software logs out when a edit to MediaWiki is made. Could you please copy [[User:Cipe/MW fix 2]] to [[MediaWiki:Revision-info-current]]? I promise it's the last change :) It is shown for a permalink to current revision. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:08, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't think that's it. I think you need to put the '''www.''' in front of '''www.conservapedia.com''' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It seems to work. I can see the messages: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546 for past revisions] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=992065 for current revision]. Thanks for changing. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:19, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you for unlocking your talk page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really appreciate being able to get in contact with you directly when the circumstances arise.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 18:39, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
Now he can try to justify what he said about the article. [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 14:29, 14 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== File:GoreFireBreathing.jpg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think it would be appropriate to use this image in the [[Current TV]] article? It's already in Gore's main article, so why not include it in the article about his obscure TV network on channel 9800 on my TV? --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:35, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== apology. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I just wanted to apologise for the comments I made related to you, they were impolite and unnecessary.  I don't have anything against you or anything, I just posted something that I thought was relevent without thinking how it would be taken by anyone other than myself, as it happened they were rude and quite personal.  I acknowledge that I behaved quite badly, and in future I will try to avoid giving you, or others, offense.  So..... virtual handshake?[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 06:18, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, don't be so dramatic. Just comment on the articles and issues of the day, and forget about personalities. That's how this project's supposed to run. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:33, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::lol. Nah it's difficult to tell over the internet how people are reacting, so for all I knew you could have been quite insulted or something, and I had to make sure that I was being very clear. Anyway, cool[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 01:03, 19 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not sure you get it: We don't want personal remarks on this wiki, clear or not. You need to be clear only about one thing: what you intend to write about an article topic. You must not comment on other users in any way. Is '''that''' clear? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== On Personal Attacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As someone who has been the subject of personal comments (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987753&amp;amp;oldid=987715], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987827&amp;amp;oldid=987777], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987956&amp;amp;oldid=987955], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=990739&amp;amp;oldid=990566]), I would like to share my opinion on Conservapedia's policy on personal attacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it is very appropriate to make '''relevant''' comments on editing and other wiki behavior to determine what the best practices are with regards to editing and other actions and, if necessary, to instruct users who may not know better about such practices.  For example, I have informed two administrators about redacting the automatically-generated deletion log entry to remove sensitive material.  I have also asked one administrator to include source information in that user's uploaded images, requests with which this user has complied.  Likewise, if someone has a habit of posting comments on talk pages without signing them, it is appropriate to inform them of how to sign posts.  Further, if someone is about to violate 90/10, a warning is definitely appropriate.  None of these have to do with the real-life '''personality''' that these editors, many of whom are brothers and sisters in Christ, have; these comments focus on on-wiki '''behavior'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, I think that if someone is going to make a statement regarding real-life facts or Conservapedia's commandments, policies, and best practices, it is appropriate to debate this statement '''without going into personality details'''.  Such debate may very well include Socratic or rhetorical questioning as a argumentative device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, Mr. Schlafly is the owner of the site, so he has the final say in this, but I'm sure he would agree with what I have written.  Although attacks on another editor's real-life personality should generally be removed, I do not see the need to remove good-faith debate and discussion over user '''behavior''' at Conservapedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for reading this.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 12:36, 21 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, thanks, Greg. If I err on the side of &amp;quot;absolutely nothing about the person&amp;quot; to an absurd point, please continue to help me out. I'm mainly opposed to comments like, &amp;quot;You're a jerk&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I don't have to follow the rules.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nothing wrong with '''friendly''' personal comments, like, &amp;quot;Thanks for pointing out that a rigid, absolutist enforcement of the rules may not be wise.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hey Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw your Arbcom case over at Wikipedia just today looking through for cases of bias there. :) Wikipedia's - nuts, huh? Lol. I ran into the Obama bias team over there in Scjessey, Wikidemon, and company, back in late 2009. It's become so hopelessly biased by now you've just got to laugh. They know they're keeping all controversy out of the Obama page and how biased they are, and don't care. Well, all my facts are at Conservapedia's services now. :) Anyway, just saying it's nice to see another ex-Wikipedian here I guess - hope we get some more! :) --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Jzyehoshua]] 01:15, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tehpwn3r==&lt;br /&gt;
'User names based on your real name or initials are '''preferred'''' does not state that you will be blocked. [[User:Conservative|Also]].--[[User:Wishnaka|Wishnaka]] 19:51, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inappropriate user name. It has been a general principle that one's user name be &amp;quot;based on one's real first name and last initial&amp;quot;, though there are a number of reasons why that is not always practical. The point is that we don't like the kind of foolish &amp;quot;handles&amp;quot; that are often used in various blogs and social web sites. If you run afoul of this by accident, you will be asked to create a new account, and doing so will not be considered sockpuppetry. Of course, some user names are essentially just vandalism, and are treated that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you don't object, I suggest shortening his block to maybe 3 days. His remark, while rude and impertinent, did have some substance, and a hard block doesn't serve to do anything but cause more unhappiness. Thanks for considering,&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 20:48, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you unblock him, you're responsible. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:54, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I recommend keeping the week. And don't &amp;gt; dont. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:01, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for pointing out the typo.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 23:35, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Michael Baumgartner==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
Please do a careful side-by-side comparison of [[Michael Baumgartner]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Baumgartner&amp;amp;oldid=509330054 the Wikipedia article]. I did a google search on &amp;quot;Michael Baumgartner&amp;quot; and came up with a number of sources including the Wikipedia article.  I took notes from all of the sources, and wrote a new article based on my notes.  I honestly believe that the article uses a different set of sources, covers ideas in a different order, and covers the topic differently than Wikipedia.  Please take another look, and if you agree, please restore [[Michael Baumgartner]]. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:05, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*I understand the workload you face. Could you please look at the article and reconsider? [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:51, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*:Already restored in good faith; I trust you, and I'm not going to compare it closely. I'll leave that to others. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:54, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My condolences ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the death of the Rev Dr Moon. [[User:JuanMotame|JuanMotame]] 18:54, 2 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome. I wonder if you could help me. I tried [[Special:MovePage/William. J. Fulbright]] but apparently I don't have permission. The page should be at [[J. William Fulbright]], the name of the founder of the Fulbright scholarship program.&lt;br /&gt;
:Done.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:26, 4 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sun Myung Moon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You changed the first sentence of the protected article on [[Sun Myung Moon]] from the present to the past tense. Could you take care of the rest of the article, too? Thanks. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:35, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Feel free to take care of that yourself. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I took care of it. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 13:21, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:32, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Requesting Assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Poor,  I'm relatively new here and don't completely know my way around.  Would you please look at my comment concerning [[Talk:American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel|American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel]].  If my view is in line with the site, I'm quite certain that a template or procedure is needed at this point.  If my views are not in line with the site, please feel free to remove that comment as you see fit.  You seem experienced here, so your guidance is requested.  --[[User:Nouniquenames|Nouniquenames]] 00:03, 21 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Psychological manipulation]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that you moved/redirected the above article to [[Essay: Psychological manipulation in the Bible]] on grounds &amp;quot;not a general article; case study uses a Bible story&amp;quot;. I've got somewhat confused about this step, because IMHO the article is general and only the case study section itself contains a &amp;quot;Bible story&amp;quot;. In fact the rest is a combination of various sources, some of them far from having anything to do w/ Bible at all. I was by far not completely done with that article and now I actually do not know how to continue working on it. It says now &amp;quot;This Is An Original Work. Contributors should add their signatures to the end section. If published, a notice will be posted and, if desired, contributors will be recognized.&amp;quot; but that was not my idea at all, I would be more than happy if anyone could help to extend that, in my opinion, general article. If I could suggest anything then I would like to suggest to move only the 'case study' section to the essay realms and keep the rest as general article with hyperlink to that essay in appropriate, perhaps 'See Also' section. I also deem as deficiency that article does not appear in the Psychology category now, I believe it belongs there.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:35, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Objections to evolution]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As for your rationale for redirect on 'Objections to evolution', namely &amp;quot;I thought we already had plenty of articles opposing the Theory of evolution&amp;quot;, I agree with you that &amp;quot;we have&amp;quot;, but still would dare to oppose the redirect on grounds that 'Objections to evolution' is an article that brainwashes people at WP and enjoys special defence by witch-hunters who heavily suppress any different points of view there thus I believe it is of significant importance to have available alternative view on the same topic under the very same title.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:50, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quote Templates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was doing some ''random page'' editing and found that there was a whole load of quote templates you created a while ago that link to nowhere and nothing seems to link to them. It seems the template for linking these quotes never got off the ground. I'm proposing that these either be deleted or put into some sort of quote page as I don't think there much use at the moment (except for possibly taking up server space). Kind Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 02:00, 2 November 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Unificationism]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I am not surprised to see you make changes to the Unificationism page in defense of  your church, but why did you remove the part in which Moon  told an interviewer,  &amp;quot;God is living in me and I am the incarnation of himself.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The whole world is in my hand and I will conquer and subjugate the world.&amp;quot;   [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19459920?print=true]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you saying the BBC made that up?  [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 08:23, 14 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can put that back in. Sorry for the delayed answer; my day job keeps me pretty busy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Be advised, though, that Rev. Moon himself disputed the ''conquer and subjugate'' quote, telling Newsweek interviewers that he had been quoted out of context. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, 20 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Way to stop the spammers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Aschlafly's talk page &lt;br /&gt;
Yesterday after I prayed an idea came to me (most likely from god) to stop the spammers from registering the spam accounts. If we can move away from user captcha and instead use a question that requires some knowledge (for example what team does tim tebow sit on the bench for or which team did he turned around) as the spambots will be completely flummoxed by this. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:16, 19 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The questycaptcha is excellent for this purpose. It stops ocr bots, and most paid spammers. The code would be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   require_once( &amp;quot;$IP/extensions/ConfirmEdit/ConfirmEdit.php&amp;quot; );&lt;br /&gt;
   $wgCaptchaClass = 'QuestyCaptcha';&lt;br /&gt;
   $arr = array (&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;A question?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;An answer!&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;What is this wiki's name?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Conservapedia&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        'Who is Tim Tebow' =&amp;gt; 'An athlete',&lt;br /&gt;
   foreach ( $arr as $key =&amp;gt; $value ) {&lt;br /&gt;
        $wgCaptchaQuestions[] = array( 'question' =&amp;gt; $key, 'answer' =&amp;gt; $value );&lt;br /&gt;
   }&lt;br /&gt;
Which you would place in /rootfiledirectory/localsettings.php[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:54, 19 November 2012 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Given your considerable experience in operating and maintaining wiki's like Wikipedia and convservapedia, do you think you would be able to implement this ? Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 05:12, 23 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A serious Biblical matter==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aschlafly wrote the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. This wouldn't have been to problematic, but now he puts his outlandish idea into an article in the main space ([[Epistle to the Hebrews]]). First he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''the most plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it.'''&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Iduan]] toned this down somewhat, so that we read at the moment:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''one plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it'''.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I couldn't find any Biblical scholar who shares this idea, I couldn't find any authorative figure who promotes this - and this isn't much of a surprise if you read the epistle for yourself!  The only &amp;quot;scholar&amp;quot; who has proposed this &amp;quot;theory&amp;quot; in the last 2000 years is Andrew Schlafly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to delete this sentence, and then I tried to make it clear that this idea is a personal insight by Andrew Schlafly. My edits were reverted:  any reader of this encyclopedia gets the impression that this theory is something commonly known or well discussed. That's utterly untrue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tend to be quite strict on Biblical matters - I'm often accused of being nitpicky.  As one of the sysops of Conservapedia who was active in 2012 I ask you to weigh in on this problem: maybe it is just me and most of the of you and your fellow sysops think that it is acceptable to present an  insight of a single person '''in a Biblical matter''' (an insight shared by virtually no one)  as a plausible theory. But - as the title of this section indicates - for me this is a very serious matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:26, 25 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree. Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, 5 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? &amp;quot;'' As I tried to convey with the phrase &amp;quot;this wouldn't have been to problematic&amp;quot;, there is nothing wrong with the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. But I think it ''is'' problematic that the ''insight'' of the essay spills over into a page in the main space, i.e., [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], and becomes a ''fact'' during this process.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree.&amp;quot;'' It's the other way round: stating the ''insight'' in an article in the main space without making it clear that the only source for this idea is Andrew Schlafly is lending it an improper credibility. If you read an unsourced, unmarked statement in an encyclopedia, the reader generally takes it as a kind of common knowledge, even more so if he is e.g., a high-school pupil.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:28, 6 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a mix of opinion and fact. Each is clearly marked. Talk pages are filled with unsourced claims, and we make very few efforts to police such talk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is currently an unsourced, unmarked statement in an article that needs attention, please point it out to me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you - if unsourced, unmarked statements are reintroduced into the article, I'll point them out to you! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:02, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im new here and need some help. I figured I would go to you since you seem very involved in the community. I recently tried to instate an article about R*tional Wiki and suddenly it was deleted. I thought since we had an article about Wikipedia that we could write about wikis. I also noticed that it had been deleted several times by the same people. Why? The words are spam filtered to. I feel that we need to write about the faults and propaganda of this completely biased website. Not to mention they completely badmouth you in the most rude ways. Please help...--[[User:Colesmithsayshi|Colesmithsayshi]] 14:18, 31 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mass Wedding ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was wanting to know what is the significance of mass weddings in the unification church ? I see your church has recently conducted it's first mass wedding since the very untimely death of the great Sun Myung Moo. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:05, 17 February 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not sure how to respond to messages. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not sure how to answer the message you sent me.  There does not seem to be a way to respond attached to the message you sent.  Do I just respond in this open forum?  Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Math ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings, Ed.  We haven't communicated in quite a while.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason I am writing is that I saw your recent [[Essay:Campaign_to_make_Conservapedia_unusable]].  I know that this has long been an issue, and that you and I have both put a lot of effort into making math/science articles accessible.  I have one comment about it:  ''Your audience for this essay is just yourself.''  All the people who made things inaccessible&amp;amp;mdash;Foxtrot, Lemonpeel, Jaques, etc, are long gone.  So, if you want the situation to improve, instead of writing an essay, you're just going to have to make the improvements yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I'm not sure what articles you have in mind for your criticism.  If it's all the topology stuff ([[Regular_space]], [[Sequentially_compact]], [[Hausdorff_space]], ...), you have my sympathy, and you will just have to delete them.  No one will improve them.  But I strongly advise you ''not'' to delete them.  They aren't doing any harm, and no one reads them (except me :-).  An encyclopedia is not judged by how esoteric its most esoteric articles are, but by how well its mainstream articles are written, and how well those mainstream articles cover the field.  I think the mainstream math articles at Conservapedia, like integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers, are pretty good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which brings me to my specific point.  It isn't true that no one edits math articles any more.  There was a small amount of activity on integers and natural numbers recently.  Perhaps this is what led you to write the essay.  I don't think there was anything over-the-top about the recent edits, and I think you sometimes over-react to things like this.  I believe that the recent edits in that area were well-intentioned, and trying to do a good job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving a really good definition of the integers or natural numbers, in the way that you and I would like, at the appropriate level but with real clarity, is ''impossible''.  Saying &amp;quot;evenly divisible by 1&amp;quot; doesn't work, because the reader who doesn't know what an integer is will have no conception of what division is or what &amp;quot;evenly divisible&amp;quot; means.  Saying &amp;quot;has no fractional part&amp;quot; doesn't work either.  I can see what the author intended--numbers are things like &amp;quot;3.7&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;.7&amp;quot; is the fractional part.  So, having no fractional part means it is something like just 3.  That's correct, but it relies on having an intuitive notion of real numbers, that is, things like 3 and 3.1 and 3.7 and 3.14159....  (Speaking of which, happy pi day!!!)  Now most people have an intuitive feel for numbers with fractions well before they have to think about a formal definition of natural numbers.  I know I did.  That is, I knew about &amp;quot;3&amp;quot; in the context of &amp;quot;3.7 without the .7&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;the biggest markings on a ruler, rather than all the small ones.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how do you write the article?  You do the best you can, giving an imprecise defintion in terms of &amp;quot;numbers that you count with&amp;quot;, or something like that.  (By the way, I really really liked your &amp;quot;mathisfun&amp;quot; web link explaining these things on an elementary level, and I used it (crediting you) in my article at Ameriwiki.)  So the right thing is probably to define &amp;quot;counting numbers&amp;quot;, as in the web link, and accepting that that's the best you can do.  Then address, very lightly, the issue of how that might be different from &amp;quot;natural numbers&amp;quot;, and whether zero is included, and so on.  It's not worth making a big deal about.  Just pick some definitions, and stick to them.  Mention that maybe not everyone agrees.  Don't worry about students getting a bad grade on an exam because of a nit-picking difference--people taking exams will presumably have attended a class and gotten the instructor's view on this, if the instructor thinks it's important.  The way you addressed the issue in the natural number article is just right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, the stuff about integers being &amp;quot;the only integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered and in which order is preserved by addition&amp;quot; is over the top.  Either take it out or move it to the very bottom.  Other than that, I think the natural number / integer articles are in pretty good shape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more thing:  Don't be put off by the fancy &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; symbol.  The people are not trying to show off.  The symbols are cool, and the students will think so.  When I was in junior high, I thought that the summation and integral symbols were really cool, long before I knew what they meant.  Let the students see them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I still say that the Peano axioms would be a good thing to have at Conservapedia.  Nowhere near as complicated as &amp;quot;integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered&amp;quot;, and really interesting for the target audience.  You may copy my Peano article from Ameriwiki if you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:34, 14 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just wanted to add my thoughts as a math graduate student who has made several edits to our math articles.  As someone who plans on becoming a professor, I think it is fundamental that, as an educational resource, Conservapedia has accessible (to the extent possible) math material.  However, we are not limited in space like a print encyclopedia, so there is certainly room for us to have more in-depth coverage of math topics for more advanced scholars.  It's not my intention to make Conservapedia unusable as an educational resource; if you think that my edits are not helpful, please feel free to discuss them with me.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:20, 15 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You may have missed my point, which is that 99% of our readers are concerned with math that is below the college level. I want the majority of our editorial effort in math to focus on what these readers need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 17 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed:  I take exception to your implication that I &amp;quot;missed your point&amp;quot; about the intended audience of CP, or how to write for it.  Be assured that I absolutely, totally, utterly, and completely understand these issues.  If you have any question about this, please see my articles on [[Limit (mathematics)]], [[Algebra]], [[Compass and straightedge]], and [[Cramer's rule]].  ''These are all topics that I studied in high school'', and I'm sure you did too.  In particular, I put an enormous amount of work into the limit article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, this stuff is entirely in your hands now.  If you have any problems with the math articles, you have the administrative power to delete any articles that you think are inappropriate, like the [[Kolmogorov space]] article.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:57, 4 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, thanks, brother wolf, for exposing your neck so meekly. But I have no desire to be top dog, if you'll excuse me for mixing metaphors. I'm glad you understand and work hard, and I hope you will help me make high school math (and below) accessible to the average reader - not just those in the top 1% like you and me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:47, 5 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must confess that I don't understand your metaphors very much -- brother wolf? exposing my neck?  I'm pretty clueless about contemporary culture.  But I know what &amp;quot;top dog&amp;quot; means.  There's no doubt that you are a top dog, being an administrator.  Also, I'm flattered to be considered in the top 1%, but, remember, there have been a lot of really sharp people here.  So I'm not sure about being in the top 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, good luck, and have fun.  And don't hesitate to delete stuff that you consider inappropriate.  Really.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll come by and look around and say hello from time to time.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:50, 11 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carbon Dioxide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have redone Brenden's edits in a number of different edits. I hope this helps you. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 07:01, 10 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It did. See my subsequent edits. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:23, 12 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Understanding Islam ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for this entry: [[Islam and tolerance]]. I followed the reference link to the news story &amp;quot;The Roots of Muslim rage&amp;quot;, and read the article. I thought it was really interesting, and as I am trying to better understand their beliefs and attitude towards us, (those of Christian faith and in Western Nations) I wanted you to know this was helpful to me, thanks. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:36, 15 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I put the article up for deletion; please contest me on it's talk page. Thanks, [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:29, 5 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I remember posting this thank-you to Ed Poor almost 3 months ago for making the page, as he referenced a very interesting article in the footnotes that helped me to better understand the position of Muslims. I had been trying to gain a better understanding of their point of view, and I found it very helpful. I'm surprised to see it up for deletion, since I don't think &amp;quot;one quote&amp;quot; pages are undesirable, as they often lead me to think more about a subject matter. Sometimes a little quote can lead to learning more about a subject. Why not add a little more information rather than try to delete the page? [[User:Taj|Taj]] 14:32, 6 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of your newer articles need some categories. I don't really know much about subject matter so would probably be better if you do it. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:03, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Feel free to place any category at all, when I'm too rushed to do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:18, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Normally I would, just not to familiar with some of subject matter. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:22, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Christian Chivalry==&lt;br /&gt;
I redirected your article on [[Christian chivalry]] to the already existing page [[Chivalry]] since they're the same concept and the other page was already much more in-depth. Hope that was alright. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:20, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did you complete the merge before reducing the page to a redirect? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:16, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not an admin, I don't think I can do a full merge like that... I figured since it was just a sentence and the sentiment of that sentence was already covered in the other article that the redirect would be sufficient... sorry. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 22:26, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you did your best in good faith, then no apology is needed. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll take a look later on, and if I think that quote is relevant I'll tack it on to [[Chivalry]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:28, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Talk:Gun control#New Infographic]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As you are one of the main contributors to the [[Gun control]] page, I'm writing here to ask you to follow the link I posted in the heading of this section and read the data I found. I think it could be very helpful to the article, but as I said there I'm far from an expert in interpreting that kind of data. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm interested in describing both sides in the [[Firearms debate]]. I don't think we have to overemphasize one side. Put in anything you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==fnarrow's reply to your terms==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just copy and pasting what he sent me, please don't shoot the messenger. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]], I agree to your terms unequivocally and will do everything I can on the future to not allow my emotions to get the better of me in the future. That said, I just want to take a second to point out that 2 of the 6 examples you gave of my behavior, (4 and 5 I believe, i do not have the other page open as I type this email) were not posted by me but were part of a comment posted by another user in response to my comments. The other 4 I do not deny and I agree that they were out of line. To that end, I would like to point out that if you or [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] look at the final interaction between myself and [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] in the &amp;quot;why complaints will go nowhere&amp;quot; section of that same page, you will see that we had settled our differences peacefully. It wasn't until after that that i was banned for earlier statements made in the heat of the moment and out of exasperation regarding the situation at the time they were made. I do not contest the justice of the 1 day block, but when it was immediately followed by the infinite block before I had a chance to respond, apologize or anything else, that was when I felt I had been treated unfairly and asked my friend to join the site as a conduit for contact. (thanks again John!) While I therefore still think the infinite block was unwarranted, i do apologize for my actions and will not allow it to happen again. Thanks for your time and i look forward to helping the site grow from this point forward. --fnarrow&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; btw, I'm not 100# sure what a &amp;quot;sock&amp;quot; is, assure you that to my understanding of the term I am not one. I have neither the time nor the inclination to edit your wiki and only made this account at my friend's request since he had no other contact anyone here. [[User:JSandler|JSandler]] 22:35, 28 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Karajou said I could unblock Fnarrow. I hope this turns out okay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:29, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fnarrow ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you be able to restore Fnarrows user and talk page whilst your at it mate ? [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:30, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:(this is [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]], I'm using [[User:JSandler|John(jsandler)'s]] phone at the moment as my IP is still blocked even though my user page shows that I have been unblocked by [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]]... Can that be fixed?) I wanted to thank everyone for helping me understand what happened and helping me get reinstated. I look forward to working with you all more in the future. Also, as [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] already posted, is it possible to have my user page and talk page content restored? Most of it can be deleted now that issues have been settled, but I'd like to recover other parts. Thanks again, [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]] 14:00, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ed, yes I can post again, I had assumed you had unblocked me... but I guess not based upon your comment on my talk page. Anyway, can you restore the content which was deleted from my user page and talk page? I don't know how to do that... Also, since you're a very knowledgeable Conservative and I consider myself to be a fairly knowledgeable Libertarian I'd be willing to work with you on the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page you created if you're still looking for someone to help with that project. Let me know. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 00:12, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked your username. Someone else seems to have unblocked your IP address; I don't know how to do that.&lt;br /&gt;
I'll leave your user and talk pages as C left them - ask him if he wants them undeleted. I'm just unblocking you, in light of your promise to chill out and be more focused on articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please start the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page, and I'll join in. Thanks! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:41, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we can do that although I am not good with wikis. From what i Understand, Libertarians are conservative when it comes to economics, gun ownership, small government, defence etc but are closer to liberals on other social issues. The way I understand it, libertarians believe the law should protect person and property, but go no further than that. I will do some research in the next few days, write a beta copy and forward to you for review/editing if thats ok&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Excellent, Patmac. I'll add that to the article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:22, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Homosexuality article and General protection idea/proposal  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[homosexuality]] article seems to be a bit broken. The table of contents is in the wrong position. Could you or another sysop please fix this ? Also I had an Idea re article protection. Would it be possible to protect some article so that only those users with '''edit''' and '''sysop''' rights edit them. This would allow those pages to be edited and improved by trusted and known users whilst stopping liberal trolls and thugs pushing their POV and vandalizing them. I think that something like this would help improve the quality and accuracy of the encyclopedia as it would allow for updates, improvements, tweaks and general formatting improvements to be made to our most popular articles [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:45, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For questions about rights (which involve software tweaks), talk to Andy. I can always unprotect an article at least temporarily. But if you want a longterm solution, I'm the wrong man to ask. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Odysseus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You should highlight quotes by including them in apostrophes: see [[Help:How to Code]] for a simple introduction - and follow [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052312&amp;amp;oldid=1052300 this link] for an example.&lt;br /&gt;
*If you include a link to a source just by using simple square brackets (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/odysseus.htm]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), it appears only as a number (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) in the text, similar to footnotes. But unlike those, it isn't listed in the references. To get it listed there, you have to include your link into &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; - tags. (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052314&amp;amp;oldid=1052313 this link] for an example)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 04:31, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps either AugustO or Ed Poor can help me, but other than on recent wikis where the quotation mark and the italic notation can be easily confused, I have never seen italic font used as a stand-alone indication of a block quotation.  I have seen italic used for titles of books or for emphasis or for foreign language words, but not as a replacement for quotation marks.  Any sources for this alternative would be appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 10:56, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:A very good question! Conservapedia states in its [[Conservapedia:Formatting conventions]]:&lt;br /&gt;
::''Italic sections of text are usually used to portion off a portion of text, indicating it is integral to the sentence without being part of its continuation. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:But while wikipedia don't like when you put quotes in italics &lt;br /&gt;
::''For quotations, use only quotation marks (for short quotations) or block quoting (for long ones), not italics. (See Quotations below.) This means that (1) a quotation is not italicized inside quotation marks or a block quote just because it is a quotation, and (2) italics are no substitute for proper quotation formatting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia doesn't address the matters (as far as I could see). Instead, Conservapedia offer some templates which try to do the job.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote}} or {{Q}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This template expects an author, so it can't be used in our special case:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Note how the text gets italicized, and is included in quotation marks: but this template is only used eleven times on this wiki. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote box}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quote box|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox2}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox2|quote=the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|source=John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:''QuoteBox2'' is used ten times on Conservapedia, ''Quotebox'' 422 times, ''Quote box'' only 1 time. Clearly they aren't very popular.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the most popular version, used over 1500 times. &lt;br /&gt;
:My conclusion: &lt;br /&gt;
:#The main feature of a quotation are - surprise, surprise - the quotation marks. Especially for short quotes, they shouldn't be omitted. I haven't used them regularly in the past (see the first quotations in this section), but I'll do so henceforth.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Conservapedia is mute on the use of italics to mark a quote. But perhaps we should follow wikipedia's lead and just don't do so&lt;br /&gt;
:#Indenting via ::: alone is not enough to mark a section as a long quote, at least &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; .. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; should be used - this indents the quote from the left and the right margin. A longer quotation should use one of the templates - best probably &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:Any thoughts? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:50, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My thought is that the last time we discussed a formatting issue, I tried to throw my weight around, and it didn't end on a cheerful note. So why don't I just follow whatever you recommend? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:24, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you.  I just want to say that I have never, ever thought of italics as conveying the limits of a quotation.  I always assumed that someone had put a printout of wiki-marked up text into an OCR scanner and it just got confused between double apostrophes and a quote mark.  I agree with your bottom line. Thanks [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 21:40, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neutral third party's viewpoint sought ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed.  I'd like to get your views on the discussion between another user and me that took place on my talk page.  It looks as if you recently blocked him over another matter.  I think he just tried to bully me for no good reason, but I'd like to hear what a senior admin thinks.  Thanks for weighing in if you get the chance.  [[User:DanAP|DanAP]] 00:14, 18 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I believe RontheDon and Bamorris9 are parodists--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 11:52, 20 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Propositional calculus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started that article.  It's a topic that you have, on several occasions (remember the &amp;quot;wff N proof&amp;quot; game?) expressed an interest in.  I urge you to fill it out.  Though I have a degree in mathematics, I do not know how to explain this topic at a high-school level, and I do not write about topics that I can't explain at a high-school level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also notice no activity on any &amp;quot;sciency&amp;quot; (STEM?) stuff over the last few months, from you or anyone else.  Have you lost interest?  I hope not.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 21:00, 1 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Susan Rice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please help me to expand the article [[Susan E. Rice]]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:29, 6 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I dont know how to put in a Officeholder-template. Can you please do it. Here are all informations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rice --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:32, 11 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edward Snowden ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should read [[Edward Snowden]]. That was my mistake. I might even have heard someone else mispronounce that.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:04, 12 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lukashenko ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please uploud this picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpeg ? Thanks--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 09:18, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For the [[Belarus]] article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No for the [[Alexander Lukashenko]]-article please.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:50, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess you mean [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_%28%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0%29.jpeg this picture.] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:yes and please uploud a picture of [[Nicolas Maduro]]. Like [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Canciller_de_Venezuela_y_Ofrenda_Floral_a_Bol%C3%ADvar_%284%29.jpg this] here--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:25, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:55, 3 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==RE:Categories==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're welcome! - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 12:09, 17 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flags and Coat of Arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud the flags and the coat of arms of the following countries: [[Guinea-Bissau]], [[Republic of China]], [[Benin]], [[Saint Lucia]], [[Saint Vincent and the Grenadines]], [[Ireland]] and [[Fiji]]. I already asked Karajou but he did´nt answered.--07:59, 21 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please uploud them.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:42, 28 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== quick reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a quick reminder. Please put category tags on your new articles. I would also try to have internal links to them from related articles (within articles or the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:04, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Your [[John Mighton]] and [[Learning styles]] articles need category tags and so do some of your most recent articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:11, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I will try to help out and add categories to a few pages in case Dr. Poor is too busy to do this immediately; he can always change the categories if he feels they don't fit. Thanks! [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:35, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservative, you are correct; thanks, Taj, for quickly filling the gap! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:19, 5 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read your article [[Ten year rule]] and it served as further impetus for me to see if this rule of thumb could be shortened via various techniques such as more rapid skill acquisition, improved memorization skills (mnemonics), increasing reading comprehension, time management skills, etc.  I found some additional interesting material on this matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as skill acquisition, a Christian I know came to the United States from Africa and became fluent in English though total immersion in English. He refused to speak his native tongue with his fellow countryman on campus. It worked. He obtained college level English skills within 3 months. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:17, 31 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Completing the square==&lt;br /&gt;
You might want to take a look at that article, and weigh in on whether it is &amp;quot;jargon&amp;quot; or otherwise pitched at an inappropriate level.  Perhaps I should have checked with you ''before'' going off the deep end.  I know that you share my interest in making the math articles accessible to the expected audience.  I believe that the topic of solving quadratic equations, and the quadratic formula, and the derivation of same by &amp;quot;completing the square&amp;quot;, are completely appropriate.  I also believe that the article covers this topic in a completely straightforward way.  (If they had used Hilbert spaces to prove the quadratic formula, that would have been a different matter!)  Anyway, feel free to put the jargon tag back if you think it should be there.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:20, 8 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't have to check with me before writing anything, and thanks for telling me about changes to [[Completing the square]]. I'm always interested in the reading level of articles, as well as any prerequisites a reader must have. The main point is not to be able to say, &amp;quot;All the information is complete and correct.&amp;quot; Rather, it is for the readers to leave here having learned or understood something which is important to them. In other words, it's not about us (&amp;quot;getting graded&amp;quot;) but about them (&amp;quot;getting edified&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:32, 9 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:See &lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic equations]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic formula]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[completing the square]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Hilbert spaces]] - way beyond [[high school math]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Jargon]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Accessibility of math articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikimedia Commons==&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud these images:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/78/Machno.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Rosa_Luxemburg.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Nicolas_Maduro_Moros.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:12, 16 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you please uploud these images also:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/Hassan_Rouhani_2.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:03, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You forgot this one: [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:12, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can you find one with an English title, instead of Russian letters? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:40, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure: [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:28, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:24, 22 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Here are the links again: '''[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG] [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]''' --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 12:15, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=upload&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1 upload log] and tell me which ones you still need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The links that I have posted over you.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:07, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Black man from Brooklyn.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not recall Conservapedia putting the race of the Sandy Hook, Aurora, or Sikh temple shooters on the front page of the website. Why do so this time? [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 12:06, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you think it's not relevant? There's been a lot of [[black on white]] crime lately. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think his blackness is as relevant as the whiteness of the majority of the spree killers in this country. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 22:15, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just went into one of your recent two sentence articles and it didn't have periods after the sentences. If you don't want to put in the effort to write an informative article and can't be bothered to even put periods after your sentences, then please consider not creating any more articles.  Andy just deleted one of our articles that was merely a quote. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe you are capable of writing good articles, but you are choosing to just slap &amp;quot;articles&amp;quot; together instead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are putting category tags on them now so you are taking some additional effort. But you need to put more effort in them if you are going to create them. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:50, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, how about [[Momentum]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:32, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== My response ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for my ill-tempered tone earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, this is what I would suggest and I will explain why below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Use this free tool to make it easy to create 400+ word articles: http://www.wordcounttool.com/ Your article was about 150 words long. This website is competing against other articles for people's attention and so keeping this standard will help this website better compete. Also, if you look at the search engine results, you will generally see the search results are at least 400 words long in length.  For example, see the search results for the word momentum here: [https://www.google.com/search?q=momentum&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high Search results for the word momentum]  and [http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=momentum&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;fr=moz35 More search results for the word momentum]. The articles are significantly over 150 words long. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People want longer articles that are at least 400 words. The search engines know this. That is why these type of articles are in the search engine results. So instead of creating three 150 word articles, write one article that is about 400 words or more. If a wiki has more search engine results, more traffic will be generated. If more traffic is generated, then more people will tend to sign up as editors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try to write articles that show up first in the search engines. Endeavor to do your best when writing an article. The Apostle Paul said, &amp;quot;Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but {only} one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.&amp;quot; (1 Corinthians 9:24).   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. If you use a quote, always cite it as students want a resource they can readily use and their teachers expect them to cite their sources for quotes. Here is a good format to use as it clearly shows the quotations around the quote plus cites the source of the quote: http://www.conservapedia.com/Socialism#Obama_administration_and_land_ownership&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for not responding in anger to my talk page post. I was planning to erase it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:34, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, put an attractive picture on your articles if possible. [[Flipperpithecus|This article]] ranks #1 at a popular search engine for a term as can be seen [https://www.google.com/search?q=flipperpithecus&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high HERE].  It features an attractive picture. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:11, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please review this block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been meaning to write to you about the block of EddyJ, but, first, something else has come up.  I believe that the recent block of DanAP is completely wrong.  He wrote a note [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Depression&amp;amp;diff=1068305&amp;amp;oldid=1068242 here], praising your work over the last six years, and was blocked for it.  I believe his note was sincere (and I happen to agree with it, by the way.)  Please do something about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the main issue is EddyJ.  He has been infinitely blocked, with the note &amp;quot;Ask Ed Poor before reinstating this person.&amp;quot;  I'm baffled by that note.  As you may know, I do extensive research of the people at Conservapedia; their interests; their viewpoints; their editing styles; and what kinds of fights they get into.  He has had some interactions with you, but nothing that would suggest that you have some special interest in his block.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He seems to be something of a hard-luck person in terms of being blocked.  He got blocked by you, by accident, which you retracted and apologized for 2 minutes later.  He got blocked 4 times by Markman, who was a vile character.  (I exchanged some email with Markman after his banishment from CP and RW; he's even more vile than you may realize.)  These blocks were clearly just Markman being destructive, and one was overturned by Andy.  Anyway, his relationship with you seems to be &amp;quot;interesting&amp;quot; but respectful.  (Rather like my relationship with you, or with Daniel Pulido&amp;amp;mdash;a very interesting person.)  His only fight with you was over the &amp;quot;Black man&amp;quot; issue, which I don't consider to have been very serious as fights go.  So please review his case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:06, 16 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Have him submit a [[writing plan]], and I'll discuss the matter with Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:36, 18 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me to expand the article [[Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst]] and dont forget the photos.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 14:07, 20 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== speedy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please look at the [[:Category:Speedy deletion candidates]] and delete some articles there.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 03:26, 16 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beethoven==&lt;br /&gt;
One finds wonderful things in unexpected places.  I happened to see your edit to the Beethoven article, with the reference to the BBC video series.  I've downloaded it.  3 parts.  It's wonderful!  You might also want to look at a similar 3-part series, also by Charles Hazelwood, about Mozart.  Both series are in three parts.  Go to the first one in each case, and you will see links to the other two.  I'd suggest putting all 3 links in the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections of the Beethoven and Mozart pages.  The first Mozart article is at [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrXpzOFknN0]; the other two are linked from there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, I'm not a great fan of putting in seemingly disconnected quotes, and I know other people have criticized you for the same thing.  I'd suggest saying something as a subsection of the line for the 9th, like &amp;quot;One commentator has said the Beethoven's ninth symphony &amp;quot;remains as potent, obsessive, and bewilderingly brilliant as ever&amp;quot;, giving the BBC link.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:21, 29 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5 maintenance tasks that need to be done - some of which could be automated - perhaps you could help as far as the automation of the tasks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some editors like to do wiki maintenance tasks. I started on two of these maintenance task, but I don't have the time to do it all myself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 maintenance task that need to be done: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1.''' De-orphan pages which have no category tags or links to them from other pages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2.''' Remove about 8% of the wiki pages which are ex-editors' user pages and user talk pages who have not edited in the last 3 years.''' And this task could probably be automated, but it could be done manually too.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a list of editors/users here: http://conservapedia.com/Special:ListUsers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you go through the list and put delete page tags on the user pages and user talk pages of users who have been inactive for 3 years, then those pages can be deleted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can also find the pages that need to be deleted by looking at the pages that have these templates on them and then see if the users have been active in the last 3 years: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AUseful+links and http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AWelcome  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3.''' Delete the templates that are never being used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4.''' Build up the 2 sentence stub articles so they have at least 500 words.  Using the random page search function, I estimate the stub articles are at least 30-40% of the wiki articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5.''' Within 10 years, about 50% of links become broken links. Xenu's Link Sleuth can crawl your website and find these dead links plus make a report: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, using this Firefox tool https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/linkchecker/ or this chrome tool https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/link-checker/aibjbgmpmnidnmagaefhmcjhadpffaoi?hl=en these dead links can be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did this link maintenance already for the atheism, evolution and homosexuality articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think these 5 maintenance tasks being done would enhance the user experience for the readers plus these are maintenance tasks that need to be done. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:37, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Automating some of these tasks ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mentioned Xenu's Link Sleuth above in order to help automate spotting the dead links. I think that deleting the the inactive editors who have not edited for 3 years could be automated as well. Maybe using something like [[User:EdBot]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:36, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I was teach math and English   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Master Yoda, welcome back you are! ;-) --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:18, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Call myself senior, I would not! :-) [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:53, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Great to see you again here, Ed!  I look forward to learning more from your edits.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:12, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Can you Help? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed. It's good to see you back. I have been wanting to join the [[Creationwiki]] and [[Citizendium]] encyclopedia projects. I recognized your name on both sites. Last year I asked on your talk page but you were away at the time. Now that you are back, can you tell me how can I get an account for [[Citizendium]]? There is a [[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:RequestAccount| forum for registering]] but they are testing it, and I do not want to give away my info without receiving my account. So, how can I request an account where I will be assured of receiving it? And, how do I get a [[Creationwiki]] account? I requested once, but I got no confirmation email either in my inbox or spam folder. It appears that Hotmail has problems. I don't think I will be requesting either at present, but when I am ready, how can I request without having to wait? [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I would like to tell you that I will still edit Conservapedia even after I join the above sites. I just will edit them in addition. I originally edited [[Wikipedia]], but I have left because I could not agree with the viewpoints there. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, I don't know anything about that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:10, 16 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== small request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, could you please put category tags on your new articles. For example, this article [[Rudd Weatherwax]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:26, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Category tags, got it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::re Category:Animal trainers, Category:Dog trainers, Category:American male film actors: [[Conservapedia:Editing_article_and_talk_pages#Categories|Unlike articles, categories are to be in title case (e.g. Australian Cities and Towns, not Australian cities and towns), and are to be plural where applicable.]] --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The recursion joke ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was used in Donald Knuth's ''The Art of Computer Programming'' in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And hello again!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to keep the math and science stuff from going off the deep end over the last couple of years.  Not really hard; you and I seem to have scared off the flamers pretty well.  But something came up very recently, that you might want to look at.  See the quadrupole stuff in [[Gravitational waves]].  It's beyond me, and I'm way too busy fighting lower-level battles at present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:24, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, Sam, I'm going to stick to the K-12 curriculum. That's what I know best. But it's great to be back! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Internet Explorer]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed. Years ago you had the article on [[Internet Explorer]] removed due to its poor sourcing, or, I am not sure what, but it is still on the talkpage. I have recreated the article with a screenshot at the side. I have posted this message to ask if you would like to help in developing the article. I am not very good at finding sources or researching, although I do what I can. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 23:01, 24 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet_Explorer&amp;amp;direction=prev&amp;amp;oldid=903283 this version] doesn't seem so bad - after 4 or 5 years. Do as you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:58, 28 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you. I have restored to that version, but retained the screenshot and the category of Internet. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 19:44, 29 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bots==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello!  As I mentioned on [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Bots_.28and_other_web_services_and_resources.29|Mr. Schlafly's talk page]], I was wondering about the possibility of trying to help CP by running a bot.  I have a limited understanding of PHP and this kind of bot, but am fairly tech savvy and have created and used other sorts of bots on occasion.  [[User:JDano|JDano]] mentioned that you are the only person of CP who has successfully set up a bot, so I just thought I would ask you what you think.  It seems to me this would be a nice thing to do, but I'm not exactly sure how to proceed.  I'm also unsure of whether Mr. Schlafly would approve of me trying this, and whether it would even work, or if this wouldn't work with the permissions level I have here.  I have a stable web server and a slightly less stable private server.  Any thoughts?  Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 15:23, 12 April 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you haven't disappeared, I might point out that my bot only worked with a previous version of MediaWiki. Let me know if you're still interested. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:44, 19 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm still here, and thanks for getting back to me!  I am also still interested, though I'm uncertain if:&lt;br /&gt;
#I am able to do this&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If I'm allowed to run a bot, since I'm not an admin&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If bots are even allowed on CP--someone thought they were altogether disallowed.&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If there is a sufficient need to a for for me to bother (and also bother others, like you)&lt;br /&gt;
::That is annoying that your bot isn't compatible with the update, but is there a way to take your basic code and put it into a new &amp;quot;adaption&amp;quot; framework?  As far as my own attempt, I'm finding a number of off-the-shelf &amp;quot;bots&amp;quot; which are freely available, but pre-configured for Wikipedia.  I don't know if they could be used or not, but it might be an option. Do you have any other thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 00:16, 20 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since my last post, I have gotten a few answers to my questions.  I also now have a working [[User:DavidB4-bot|batch edit bot]].  It has a lot of limitations and a few bugs, but it's a start.  I would like it if one of use could get a sort of vandalism reduction/reversion bot working, as you previously had.  I in no way want to steal the task from you, but if you can't get something like this working, I would appreciate some guidance as to what previously worked and how it failed.  In any case, I would very much like an improved edit bot, as what I have now is a simple, static cue of batch tasks to execute, either once or recursively. This is proving useful, but not as useful as I would like.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I deleted my user page, but still appears in the history. Please help me delete my pages at conservapedia.com and my conservapedia.com account. Please delete them.  (data-provider)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Merry Christmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Merry Christmas.gif|cebter|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merry Christmas!  And have a happy New Year's Day. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:49, 24 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Talmud and &amp;quot;taking things out of context&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I'm no anti-Semite. I may have my issues with the Talmud, but it strictly has to deal with how they treated God (not even Jesus, just God himself). And I would still fight to the death to protect Judaism and Israel itself especially from the likes of Islam, Stormfront, the KKK and the like. The types of Jews I do have immense respect for are the ones who adhere to the Torah only, or at least primarily.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second of all, surely you must have seen the parts in those quotes that specifically state where those quotes came from. And for the record, there were a few Jewish people who confirmed a lot of what was said in those quotes from the Talmud. Case in point: https://youtu.be/YSy6ENVAJlY And there was one person who converted to Christianity and testified what was in the Talmud. For example, Bernard Lazare, a French Jew who upon converting testified the Talmud's role in the Jewish revolts and also what actually was said in the Talmud.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third of all, I get enraged whenever someone claims I took something &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot;, and in fact am enraged with the phrase itself, because I only see it as an excuse to cover up bad things, like when people claim that Lenin took Marx &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot; when he did those evil things even when those were exactly the stuff Marx demanded that Communism should be done in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I used to naively believe that the Talmud was part of God's design, that the Jews still worshipped God even if they don't worship Jesus himself, but they don't, they if anything make him more like a plaything, and that I will NOT tolerate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:14, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, try to get a handle on your rage and focus your efforts on improving articles. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:21, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not actually enraged, or at least, I'm keeping a pretty tight lid on my rage, so I am getting quite a bit of a handle on my rage actually. Didn't resort to name calling. Anyways, I reverted your edit, because, 1., those quotes have been verified by countless people, some of whom were Rabbis themselves, and 2., if you really wanted to address that bit, you should have responded to it directly, not removed it. I also added your reply back in, though I had to change it slightly since, due to the quotes still being there, it wouldn't make sense to mention you removed the quotes. And again, those quotes weren't taken out of context, as even Yossi Gurvitz and Bernard Lazare verified those quotes were accurate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:24, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest you get back to what we were doing before you supplied all those Talmud quotes. Wasn't it something to do with Trump and a so-called &amp;quot;[[Muslim registry]]&amp;quot;? I could use some help with that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine, I'll help with that, as long as you stop taking those quotes out. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:28, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can appeal your block to Andy, Conservative, or any other admin. But issuing ultimatums and refusing alternatives is not a part of collaborative editing. Bye! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't making an ultimatum, nor was I refusing alternatives (if anything, I actually DID try to compromise by letting you retain your response while still keeping the quotes). Ironically, I WAS about to make a contribution to the Muslim Registry article when you blocked me. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 16:58, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sigh. You're right. I guess I was too hasty: no one else at Conservapedia whose opinion I value agreed with your block!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Forgive me? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009.  It is now registered and somewhat set up.  I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel.  Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering.  In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later.  If you are interested, please let me know!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:46, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you could implement this project, that would be excellent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable?  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The blue links on a dark red background is hard to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sorry for the late reply - I haven't been checking CP every day. Here is how to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 turn off] the background on the useful links, and here is how I [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 made the background light yellow]. Hope it helps. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:56, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, some people have started to edit Conservapedia and then quickly gave up because they didn't know how to edit a wiki.  I noted about 3 people who did this. There are probably many more who quit but didn't say anything. I added a link entitled &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot;.  But I believe there are various versions of the welcome template so my link is not on all welcome template versions. For example, the welcome template that JPatt uses didn't incorporate my &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot; link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the newest version of the Wikimedia software allow for WYSIWYG editing? In other words &amp;quot;What you see is what you get&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The newest version of the Wikimedia software does not have the counter at the bottom of the pages. I understand why Andy Schlafly likes the counters at the bottom. I like the counters too. I guess there might be an extension to add the counters to the newest version of Wikimedia. But after all is said and done, having WYSIWYG editing could greatly increase the participation rate at this wiki and lower the rate of people falling out because they don't know how to edit a wiki. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:40, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==== Here is the welcome to Wikipedia and it is much better and legible ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Plate of cookies.jpg|thumb|300px|Some cookies to welcome you! [[File:Face-smile.svg|25px]]]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]], Conservative! I am [[User:This lousy T-shirt|This lousy T-shirt]] and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Knox490|your contributions]]. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], or feel free to leave me a message on [[User talk:This lousy T-shirt|my talk page]] or type ''{{tl|helpme}}'' at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message!  I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Help:Contents|Help pages]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Article development|How to write a great article]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ten_Simple_Rules_for_Editing_Wikipedia Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia].&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Also, when you post on [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] you should [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] using four tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.  Again, welcome!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Conservapedia needs a better greeting. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:02, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks Ed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:05, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:37, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Done, but you've been around long enough. Why don't you ask Andy for blocking rights? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:39, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm confident he would use block right appropriately, but Andy might be hesitant to give the privilege to Sam.  Sam has been in a number of disputes, and has been banned a few times as well.  I'd support Sam getting the privilege, (I'd say he's more than earned it since I've been here alone, nevermind all the time before that) but I don't know if it could happen. Besides, aren't privileges generally given, not requested? --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:09, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::David, you have hit the nail right on the head.  Blocking rights are given, not requested.  And my long career here is full of blocks (19 of them), including blocks by people who were later revealed to be vandals or parodists:  DanielPulido and the notorious Markman.  And illicit blocks by &amp;quot;assistants&amp;quot; over content disputes.  (I seem to have a knack for upsetting bullies.)  And several blocks by my friend Conservative; we get along much better now.  And two by Ed Poor himself; I think we get along much better now; I won't bore you with the details.  When you've been around as long as I have, you develop a history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no interest in getting any special powers.  I like to think of myself as a &amp;quot;conscientious objector&amp;quot; in these wars.  People know that if they wrongly block me, I can't and won't fight back.  But others will (hopefully) undo the damage.  I think a lot of people respect me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But when big vandal attacks come along, and I can't get anyone else to take action, that's when I wish I had block powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you for your kind words.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::SamHB, you brought those blocks (none of which were &amp;quot;illicit&amp;quot; like you claim) down on yourself for the exact reasons DavidB4 pointed out, as well as for repeatedly and insistently putting liberal POV into some articles (including even now, with the [[fake news]] article two days ago) and for provoking fights (also including now). If you didn't insist on trying to turn Conservapedia into Liberalpedia, you wouldn't get chastized by the admins as much as you do. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It's true that I've had a hair-trigger for blocks, but you might not know that I often agonize over these and consult Andy by private email afterwards. It's not easy to admit that I've overstepped, but my record shows that I have SOMETIMES unblocked someone after a few moments (or days?) of reflection. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:31, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unrelated to what's above, Ed Poor, I see that several of your recent blocks have been indefinite. I used to do this a lot, but I no longer do because it can cause many innocent people to lose access to CP. Oftentimes, IP addresses get shifted around, so different, unrelated people end up using the same address at different times. That means that one indefinite block could affect many people over time. Also, vandals don't tend to be the type of people in a perminent location, so it is unlikely they will be using the same IP address after some time even if the address is the same in the same location. I recommend five-year blocks instead with even shorter blocks necessary for less serious vandalism. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;amp;diff=1304184&amp;amp;oldid=1303142 DavidB4 explained it better on my talk page.] Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:40, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== WOTUS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is [[Waters of the United States rule]] and [[Clean Water Rule]] the same thing? If so, they should be merged. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:48, 1 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The articles should be merged, although the two rules are slightly different. Can you do it? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:38, 2 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are many rules implementing the Clean Water Act.  Shouldn't you just have one comprehensive article about the Clean Water Act?  Also, we should have a separate article about the definition of &amp;quot;Navigatable Waters of the United States&amp;quot;, because this term defines federal jurisdiction in contexts beyond just the Clean Water Act.  It also defines the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers and the  old Federal Power Commission (now  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) with respect to the licensing of hydroelectric projects. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 04:54, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no objection, as long as readers will be able to understand what each of those hot-button phrases means, politically:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Navigable waters of the United States]] has nothing to do with navigation or shipping. It's merely a compromise between polluters and farmers on the one hand, and clean-water freaks or preservationists on the other. &lt;br /&gt;
:::*Similarly, the [[Clean Water Rule]] is not mostly about clean drinking water for people, but it also restricts legitimate (farm) use and delights the [[no-use]] environmental lobby&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The [[WOTUS]] rule is a variation on the Clean Water Rule that isn't so tough on farmers filling in a swamp (see [[Wetlands]]) to get more crop land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you two can make one article out of all this mess, go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi Uncle Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I'm finally here. I would love to get in touch with you again. You are a wonderful person, always very friendly. --[[User:Annie Poor|Annie Poor]] ([[User talk:Annie Poor|talk]]) 13:10, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Great to see you! ==&lt;br /&gt;
Great to see you, Ed!  Hope all is well.  It's fantastic to see a longtime friend again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:42, September 20, 2022 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi dear Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God bless you Ed Poor.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RobS is actually againt this LT behavior. &lt;br /&gt;
It's LT who blames Jews for Hitler, not RobS.&lt;br /&gt;
This is about LT, he just pasted it all from his talk page on to here.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:38, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice quotes on leadership on your user page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked the quotes on leadership that are on your user page.  I copied them to this page:  [[User:Conservative/Quotes]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:56, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hooray!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
You made my day, Ed!!!  So good to see you again.  I have the good memory of attending a certain college speech with you and others perhaps a decade ago.  So glad you're still active!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:57, October 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Larry Sanger==&lt;br /&gt;
I note you have good things to say about [[Larry Sanger]] who has professed his belief in [[Christianity]] in recent years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]] made the assertion that Larry Sanger was an [[atheist]] (totally untrue) and either [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=2070366&amp;amp;oldid=1976745 condoned or was a practitioner of bestiality] which was repeated in [https://therightscoop.com/why-should-a-conservative-bother-using-wikipedia/ conservative media]. After Sanger's conversion from [[agnosticism]] to Christianity I cleaned up the Wikipedia page and at least a half dozen other pages User:Conservative copy pasted his [[spam]] into. But he steadfastly refuses to clean up at least 342 other pages with his assertions, nor change his editing habits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:21, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Two decades ago, Larry said he was an atheist, but I never held that against him, particularly because I was at the time an active member in the most unpopular new religion in America. Both he and Jimbo Wales supported me as a preeminent expositor of &amp;quot;neutrality&amp;quot;. If there is anything that needs to be cleaned up, post it here or email me at uncle_ed_poor@yahoo.com. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:29, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Woman pilot accused of being a DEI hire ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Re: Woman helicopter pilot accused of being a DEI hire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;According to research and data, there is no significant difference in piloting ability between women and men, meaning women pilots can be just as good as male pilots when considering skill and competence; studies have shown that when factors like experience are controlled for, accident rates between genders are largely comparable.&amp;quot;[https://www.google.com/search?q=are+women+pilots+as+good+as+men&amp;amp;oq=are+woman+pilots+as+goo&amp;amp;gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCAgBEAAYFhgeMgYIABBFGDkyCAgBEAAYFhgeMggIAhAAGBYYHjIICAMQABgWGB4yCAgEEAAYFhgeMg0IBRAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBhAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBxAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMgcICBAAGO8FMgYICRAuGEDSAQkxNDY5NGowajGoAgCwAgA&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But there is a long tradition of blaming women for calamity and incompetence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. &amp;quot;Women driver&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Adam blamed Eve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. I am waiting for FAA to give their ruling and I am not pre-judging matters. I haven't been following this news story closely. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this clarifies matters. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:53, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think the executive branch criticism was for her being a woman - but for being inexperienced, and pushed into a job to fill a DEI quota. I'll try to follow up on that. Anyway, the DEI controversy is a major part of the story. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:58, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I just saw a news report at: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmpkoJhqUP8 FAA Academy struggled to fill classes over DEI quotas: Sen. Mullin]. The claim is that at the time of one of the recent crashes, the air traffic control tower was understaffed. This news report indicated that when you have DEI what happens sometimes is that a significant portion of jobs become not filled because they are looking for a DEI hire with the requisite skills to do the job when there are non DEI applicants who could do the job and are not hired. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:11, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I think that is the Trump Administration argument. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:41, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Speaking of focusing on DEI over competency: &amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;The DNC Leader interrupted the party election to tell members that not enough non-binary candidates have been elected, so they MUST now vote for one.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/behizytweets/status/1885836927112552800 per this][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:46, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::From what I have heard so far, the planes usually come down a certain runway which I will call Runway A.  But the plane that was in the crash was coming down Runway B.  From what I understand, the pilot accidentally left out the information that the plane was coming down Runway B. On top of this, light pollution caused the helicopter pilot to probably not see the plane. And from what I understand, the air traffic tower was understaffed and that may have contributed to the air traffic controller mistake. On top of this, Trump is claiming that the helicopter was flying at an inappropriate altitude. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But like I said, I am not pre-judging things. I will reserve judgement until the FAA makes its ruling. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:51, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Telling, you might find this interesting: [[Prevalence of homosexuality going down in cultures that become more conservative]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:54, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
* Guys, Remember this dreadful non answer by KBJ in Mar 2022?[https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2022/3/video-release-judge-jackson-cannot-define-woman-during-blackburn-scotus-day-two-hearing-remarks] [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])•&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At Reagan National, ATC routinely asks pilots if they can land on the shorter runway (change from runway 1 to runway 33). Helicopter pilots SHOULD know this. If not, why not? Especially if they are TRAINING for a crucially important emergency flight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, they know (if they are bright enough to pound sand) that they will be crossing the flight path of landing airplanes. Wouldn't it make sense to be darn sure they aren't going to collide with any of them? (Not just the one that ATC &amp;quot;mentions&amp;quot;?) The best way to avoid a collision with another aircraft is to be NOT at the same altitude. Helicopters can fly safely between 50 and 200 feet off the ground, even at night.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
100% pilot error, Captain Rebecca Lobach, out of [[Davison Army Airfield]] in [[Fairfax County, Virginia]]. My condolences to your family. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:53, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2106053</id>
		<title>User talk:Ed Poor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2106053"/>
		<updated>2025-02-02T00:41:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Agreeing with Cons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Archive: &lt;br /&gt;
[[/1|1]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/2|2]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/4|4]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/5|5]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/6|6]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/7|7]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/8|8]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/9|9]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/10|10]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/11|11]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/12|12]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/13|13]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/14|14]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/15|15]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/16|16]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/17|17]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/18|18]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ed poor grinning.jpg|right|thumb|114px|Ed Poor on campus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- New comments at the bottom, please. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writing Plan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to submit a writing plan. While I haven't been asked for one, I feel this would best help keep me on task and contribute the most productively. You seem to know an awful lot about this wiki stuff, and I'm still new at it, so if you could help me that would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
I think I'd first like to help contribute to the various book articles around the site by adding in examples of the influence of Christianity, as a lot of books have Christian overtones that aren't currently listed. I'm thinking I'd like to start by drawing parallels between the story of Jesus in the Gospels with One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Please let me know if this would be acceptable.--[[User:JeremiahJ|JeremiahJ]] 18:10, 6 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably not. Please email me a draft. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 17 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor, I have submitted a request [[Talk:Atheism#Addition_of_Information_on_Charity_and_External_Links_Request|here]] but it was never attended to. Could you please have a look at it? Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:19, 28 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Image Upload Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
I am new here. Can you upload these images please.&lt;br /&gt;
https://puresocialnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/PA-Reg-Trends-1024x576.png&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.wikispeedia.org/seth_keshel_photo_2021-07-11_17-39-09.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I create Seth_Keshel page, but today its gone. Not sure how to proceed.&lt;br /&gt;
-James Pruett&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed Poor, I hope this message finds you doing well. I was wondering if you could upload [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Young_Galaxy_Accreting_Material.jpg this image] for use in the article I recently created. I look forward to hearing your response. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:32, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello Ed Poor, could you please add [[Atheism and the suppression of science]] to [[Template:Nb Atheism|this template]]? I really appreciate it! With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:14, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hello Ed Poor, I need two more images for the article I created which are available [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Independent_assortment_%26_segregation.svg here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Lennox.jpg here]. Recently, [[User:JMR10]] uploaded my previous one, for which I am thankful. Could you ask him to do the same for these two or could you please do these for me? I highly appreciate it. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:40, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I seem to have messed up the Ada article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My proxy keeps dropping stuff, so the picture at the top is busted.  Also, I had to cut down the reference, because the captcha can't make it through.  It should have a left bracket, and h,t,t,p, etc., and a right bracket after the &amp;quot;pdf&amp;quot;. I wonder if you could please fix it for me.  I will contact Andy about getting my IP range restored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I was going to put in the talk page (and will do once things get straightened out) is that the two cited articles are very shallow, having only 7 and 3 sentences, respectively.  They both refer to a &amp;quot;plan&amp;quot;, but that's because the word &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been coined in the computer context.  She really was the first person to write &amp;quot;code&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry about this.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:08, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I read her notes, and it doesn't look like a [[computer program]] to me. A charitable view might be that it's a [[specification|spec]], but there's no flowchart and no [[source code]]. Don't be sorry, just get it right. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:21, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What did you expect this &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; to look like?  The term &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; implies both a programming language and &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot; that the source code is assembled or compiled into.  Assemblers, compilers, and programming languages wouldn't be invented for another hundred years (by Grace Murray Hopper, John Backus, and others.)  The same goes for the other accoutrements of modern software development, like flow charts and specifications.  In fact, even the terms &amp;quot;software&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been invented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, assuming that you accept that she had to write &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot;, what would you expect machine code to look like for a machine that reads its instructions with rods poking through holes in large punched cards running around on a track, and does its arithmetic by counting teeth on turning gears?  It wouldn't look much like Intel 586 code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact is, the lines of Ada's written algorithm were intended to be punched into lines of holes in Babbage's cards, once the &amp;quot;analytical engine&amp;quot; was built, which it wasn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, what I was being &amp;quot;sorry&amp;quot; for was not the content of my edit, but the fact that an extremely buggy proxy messed up the article and wouldn't let me fix it, despite several tries.  Andy has been working with me to fix the network problems, and DMorris fixed the broken picture and hyperlink while my access was broken.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 20:39, 6 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then it would be more accurate to say that she described an algorithm. That's not the same as a computer program, even if she was hoping that Babbage's machine might be programmed to carry out the algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An encyclopedia should be precise and unbiased, not used to create &amp;quot;factoids&amp;quot; for use in publicity campaigns, such as promoting [[women in science]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't say she had to write machine code, but rather to be the &amp;quot;first programmer&amp;quot; she would have had to produce a [[computer program]]. If you have seen it, please show it to me. Otherwise, I'm going to make an editorial decision that she produced an algorithm rather than a program. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:18, 7 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Let's say that [[Ada Lovelace]] wrote one of the first comprehensive descriptions of an algorithm to generate [[Bernoulli numbers]]. But until I see the actual sequence of instructions, including [[if-then]] or [[loop control]] statements, I'd hesitate to call it an actual [[computer program]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:17, 17 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The anti-Semitism of liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
I love how libs reveal their true selves.  No matter what we say or do in describing them, they come here just to confirm it all.  So when they want to emphasize &amp;quot;Jew&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;karajou&amp;quot;, I'll be more then happy to get a gold Magen David to wear around my neck, join my brothers and sisters in the synagogue every week, and show everyone else just how hate-filled and intolerant these liberals really are.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:20, 12 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please help! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! I tried to add the information for Edo to the Tokyo article and for some reason,. it stripped a bunch of stuff out when I saved. Now when I try and revert the edit I made, I keep getting a internal server 500 error. Please can you revert for me? [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:19, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's ok, I fixed it! [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:30, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm glad it worked out for you. My Japanese name is &amp;quot;Edo&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:04, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice speed on reverts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You beat me to every one! Nicely done--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:05, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. I'll pass that on to my secret bot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:10, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks for noticing me ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must be doing something right. Every time I mention alternate viewpoints, and no one sees fit to revert my edits, I get vandalism to my talk page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:48, 10 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jeb Bush ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm trying to reorganize the information, not leave it out. If you notice, I'm working on the article quite a bit. May I please revert your revision? [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:05, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sure. I'm frequently too bold and hasty. And that's the wonderful thing about a wiki. Nothing is ever really deleted; it's all in the article history. Go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:09, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technical question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm lobbying for a separate namespace for the Conservapedia Bible Project. The idea is that each verse gets its own ''article'', which can be used rather as a template. I see a couple of advantages:&lt;br /&gt;
*verses can be quoted more easily: instead of copying the whole verse, only a short link (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; ) is neccessary to get a neat result: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*thereby, the use of the CBP is encouraged over other translations.&lt;br /&gt;
*if there is a change in the CBP, the afflicted verses don't have to be tracked down manually, but the change is applied automatically throughout the wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To accomplish this, a new namespace has to be created. That shouldn't be too difficult, as there are only a few exemplary pages prefixed with ''CBP:'' at this moment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But after this, the namespace has to be filled with the existing translated verses. My question: is your bot up to this task?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 10:53, 8 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== madonna ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, please strongly reconsider your desire to create a &amp;quot;kinder article.&amp;quot; In stating that madonna is a person who has changed to being more spiritual you are buying to the liberal media's lies. It sounds like a madonna fan attempting to weave their bias in, which of course you are not. I think you may want to do more research, and read my recent additions as she is still, if not more so, a wicked and hateful person who has sucked millions of children into raunchy culture, dated murderers and mocked our Lord Jesus Christ who gave his life for us. Madonna deserves only the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:14, 14 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And I just had a long conversation with some Wikipedians in Central Park last month, about whether CP is more neutral than WP. Now you want &amp;quot;conservative bias&amp;quot; to denounce [[Madonna Ciccone]]? Not even Wikipedia's BLP policy would allow that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder whether you are a liberal '''tempting me''' to add bias, just so you can accuse us of being biased. Well, if so, I choose not to cooperate, my dear elf. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:45, 14 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Legolas here might be a parodist. Would you mind looking into him? [[User:NickP|NickP]] 00:12, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, your compassion sounds a little misplaced to me. Do you also visit the Fred Phelps, Bernie Madoff, Ted Bundy, and Charles Manson pages asking people for some &amp;quot;Christian charity&amp;quot; to tone those down too? Look into me all you want please. I dislike Madonna because she has mocked our lord Jesus Christ. Conservative people have respect for Christ end of story. The reason society has degraded is by giving raunchy people like madonna a free pass and pity. I'm the one who wants to print the ACTUAL history of madonna that the liberal media has left out such her dating the felon Chris Paciello. I only want the truth about her in the article. Why is that so bad? I thought this was the one place that might allow the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:34, 17 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ed, can you please look into this guy? He is an obvious parodist. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 15:55, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
First of all - Ed is a senior sysop at this site - I don't know why a few of you have taken upon yourself to post on [[User talk:Aschlafly|Andy's talk page]] when Ed is more than capable of dealing with an alleged parodist on his own. Secondly, just because he is posting radical things on a talk page does not make him a parodist. Looking at his contributions, you ''could'' argue that he is edit warring, but since Ed is simultaneously the user in the revert war and an admin, it is up to his judgement as to whether or not a block is deserving. Your collective alarmism has now spread across three talk pages. That's enough.--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 16:00, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::@NickP, your very.... quick to call somebody else a parodist. Why not leave that to the pro.'s to decide?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:06, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Several others have also pointed out the fact that he acts very suspicious. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:13, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Saying he &amp;quot;acts suspicious&amp;quot; and saying he's a 100% no way im wrong about this Parodist is two completely different things.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:16, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I prefer what Wikipedia old-timers used to call &amp;quot;soft security&amp;quot;. Just help me fix the articles in question. Everything will sort itself out. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:34, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==EdBot==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I left three (actually six) problem Categories that need some sort of merging at [[User_talk:EdBot]]. Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, EdBot did not survive the MediaWiki upgrades. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:21, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Does that mean it's all got to be done manually? Moving 200 entries into another Category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Only if they really have to be moved. (Meanwhile, if anyone has an idea how a bot can &amp;quot;log in&amp;quot; with the new MediaWiki software, let me know.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot#Logging_in This] should help. Indeed, the whole [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot page] is quite interesting. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:40, 19 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A request concerning recent events ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm very sorry to come to you with this, but I honestly don't know where else to turn at this point.  You have always struck me as the voice of reason and level-headedness here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply put: the current altercation on Andy's talk page is out of control.  I recognize that I have no authority to tell sysops what they should or shouldn't do, but it seems to me that basic common courtesy calls for not filling up Andy's talk page with arguments and accusations.  Moreover, the very public nature of the dispute is encouraging other users to join in.  Some of them are doubtless sincere; others, I suspect, may in fact be parodists seeking to fan the flames (I notice a LOT of recently created accounts.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless, the fact remains that Andy's talk page has been turned into a general forum for accusations and arguments.   At this point, it's degenerated to the level where people are making absolutely vicious personal attacks against certain of the participants.  (Kudos to JamesWilson for promptly reverting the most egregious of these.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know the other sysops better than most of us; you talk to them; I would certainly hope they trust and respect your opinion.  Is there anything you can do to persuade them to take a step back, cool down, and wait for Andy to respond at this point?  Everyone involved has made their positions clear; further acrimony can serve no useful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry to trouble you with this, but I really feel that this is both inconsiderate to Andy and deleterious to the Conservapedia project as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:05, 28 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the vote of confidence, but shouldn't I check with Andy before barging in? It may be that he prefers to let everyone air their opinions. It is not just his courage but his wisdom and compassion that attracted me to this project. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:59, 5 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[User:MRellek]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, per the site owner, Administrators [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Guidelines&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=892763 &amp;quot;instructions...are to be followed&amp;quot;] is no longer operable. I have emailed you a copy of Mr. Schlafly's approval.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, sorry. I was hasty. Feel free to unban MRellek, if you feel I was out of line. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, Ed. I'm trying to get the other sysops to do more warnings &amp;amp; shorter blocks; let's get a sense of community here. After all, we've known many of these editors (the RW neighbors) for several years now.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:37, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel. I invited someone to edit Conservapedia and they were blocked and they should not have been. I got the block overturned. So I think there is room for improvement in Conservapedia's blocking policy. You can sign up [[User:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. I invited active Syops/Admins plus people with blocking rights who might wish to be Sysops. If I left anyone out, please let them know about the panel.  The people with blocking rights can sign up [[User talk:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. The panel will probably convene when Iduan is back from his summer vacation or fairly soon afterwards.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:47, 13 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think I got signed up somehow, after jumping into a discussion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can we have non-sysops on the panel? I'd like to invite a friend from Wikipedia to join it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:00, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== If I understand correctly, you are the local math expert. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If so, maybe you can take a look at [[Relativistic mass|this]] and some of that editor's other contributions. They seem pretty obscure/specialized for the general reader, to me, at least. Thanks! [[User:MrMorganH|MrMorganH]] 10:15, 14 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not an expert, but I know a lot about high school math. Andy's brother knows much more than I do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:55, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Revert ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good morning (afternoon?) Ed, why was my comment reverted? I can't see why it should be? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:54, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gosh, you're quick on the trigger. See your talk page for my response. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:58, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I am indeed quick on the trigger, I like Westerns you see..:-)  I have responded to you on my talk-page and re asked the question in a more cordial manner. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:59, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Conservapedia  Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings have begun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel proceeding have begun here:  [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings]] You can start making your edits to the page should you wish to do so.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:59, 17 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Farewell ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, in all sincerity you are by far the most interesting person I have met at Conservapedia.  I regret that we couldn't get along better, though we did manage to improve a number of things.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:12, 18 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We'd have gotten along better if we more goals in common. Building a trustworthy encyclopedia apparently was not one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=893745 this drive by attack] you dodged my request for specific instances of the problem you complained of. (Note: saying &amp;quot;all of them&amp;quot; is a a typical liberal dodge. That's like global warming alarmists saying, &amp;quot;Just look at the temperature record; the evidence is all there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For those listening in to this fascinating drama, the difference between real science and liberal junk science is that real scientists provide examples of what they're talking about, so that anyone can check it out and see for themselves. Liberals and other pseudoscientists '''pretend''' that they've already made the point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It reminds me of Japan, which always (1) says that it &amp;quot;already apologized&amp;quot; for the [[comfort women]] episode while steadfastly (2) refusing ever to admit that it did anything wrong. They are hoping we'll all be too polite to mention that #1 contradicts #2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice try on the parting shot, but your pretense of trying oh so hard fools no one. You're always welcome to come back if you '''ever''' choose to help this project instead of undermining it with trickery. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pontiac==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for your help archiving my page.  I know you are very experienced with Wikis, but I was wondering why you removed what I wrote about the government shut down of Pontiac destroying American history.  A lot of people were really upset about Pontiac's closure and there are lots of websites and articles proving this, why can't it be in the article?  I will differ to your judgement because you are so experienced, but just want to understand your reasoning. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 22:46, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can't be in the article until you find a way to make it trustworthy. Use references. You can't just write stuff off the top of your head, because you are not an established author. You are in fact an anonymous person, and we don't even know whether Craig is your real name. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If there's a lot of proof for your assertion, be sure to provide references, like:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The New York Times reported that after GM was taken over by the government, brands like Saturn and Pontiac were sold or eliminated (link and/or date)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you need help formatting references, lots of people here can help. But '''you''' must supply them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:43, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Pictures==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, how do I add pictures?  --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 16:08, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can't add pictures, until you've made enough useful contributions to earn upload rights. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:34, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In addition, Craig, you can use [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]] until you earn uploading privileges. A Sysop will do it for you.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 21:59, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll work even harder to earn my rights!   I also wanted to apologize for being so familiar, my mom pointed out that I should be calling you Mr. Poor. I always call adults by their last names in real life, but on the internet I usually forget.  Also thanks Mr. Wilson for your advice about upload requests. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 13:24, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::No worries. I wouldn't mind if you called me James or Jim, but I'm glad your mother has taught you well. Also, you will need a lot more work to earn uploading privileges, just so you know. Happy editing in the meantime!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 14:21, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit conflict ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just got edit conflicted by you on the Morse code page - what are the odds we'd both be working on it! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:19, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One thought leads to another ... not such long odds. Sorry about stepping on your work. Feel free to revert, and I'll recover later. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Its all OK, I added my work to your version. Great minds think alike, more like an average mind in my case but you catch my drift...:-) [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:24, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== signature ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you don't mind, but I borrowed the format of your signature to use for my own. It's simple and to the point, but looks nice as well, so I thought I would use it as well. Thank you! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:02, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I copied mine from someone else, so &amp;quot;[[Pay It Forward]].&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:27, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, ok. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:23, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== like wikipedia? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i looked up [[milk]] and [[butter]] how is this conserivtive? is it like wikipedia at all what can i add? ty. --[[User:Rainbowboiz|Rainbowboiz]] 00:35, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not unless your spelling improves. And we are not so much &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; as [[trustworthy]]. Unlike Wikipedia, we really do try to avoid political bias. Add anything that is correct and useful. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:17, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meat Loaf ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know his stage name is much better known (I'm writing the article on him, obviously), but wouldn't you think using the subject's real name is more appropriate for an encyclopedia? If you think the article should be titled under his stage name, you're the boss, but I thought I might want to point that out. Thanks!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 11:14, 1 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me as I am fairly new to this wiki.  I have attempted to propose a discussion for deletion on this particular page.  Before disccussing this, I have followed the instructions on templates via the help index [[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Articles_for_deletion]] to add it to a discussion for deletion but this does not seem to work so I have not proceded further - with hindsight I should have guessed there was something wrong by the lack of entries on this page.  &lt;br /&gt;
My reason for wishing to commence this discussion is that I suspect the article (created by a user who does not appear to have an active talk page) seems to me to be parody and trolling to debase the credibility of this project.  In my opinion, most of the logic followed in nearly every assertion is spurious and often uses blatant synthesis that a ten year old could question.  It is to such an extent that I don't think an &amp;quot;improved&amp;quot; version would be posible.  Of course, others may have different oppinions which is why I am trying to be fair and open it for rational discussion.  What is the correct procedure?  Thank you in advance - answer to my talk page [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 19:54, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure what the correct procedure is. Maybe you could post on the talk page, showing a few examples of &amp;quot;spurious&amp;quot; assertions. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:46, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok I can do this, but I'm surprised that hte Help feature supplies a redundant page on discoussing articles for deletion.  I was also under the impression that you had Sysop/Admin powers and would be familiar with such policies as it is a feature on other wikis.  [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 13:31, 8 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually I know policy fairly well and do have Sysop/Admin powers. Either provide the requested examples, or drop the matter. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:47, 10 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sid 3050 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sid 3050 was blocked for three month for ''trolling''. The only edit he made during the day before his block seems to be to answer to your question in a section above (''So, will it go away if you ignore it?'') - see his [[Special:Contributions/Sid 3050|list of contributions]]. You had personally addressed this comment (''But I'll take a look at Sid's material below now, just to be a good sport.''), so you should be able to judge whether such a comment is ''trolling''. Could you please review Sid's block? In a timely fashion? Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 09:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sid was trolling. Whether this justifies a three month block is up to the admin in question. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm always open to suggestions for making Conservapedia more trustworthy. If you have anything specific in mind, please speak up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of particular interest to me would be any material relating to the contrast between conservative and liberal viewpoints on American political issues, as well as philosophy, religion and science. To my regret, repeated invitations to include users who are ideological opponents of this project have not met with an enthusiastic response. It's almost as if they wish to conceal their ideological differences; ironically, this could be seen as self-censorship. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If anyone wants to describe liberal POV here they may, provided only that it is clearly labeled as such - not presented as gospel. This should not be an onerous requirement: it's the same as Wikipedia's NPOV policy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:42, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Help! A user called CortA is currently vandalising articles. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:15, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, Andy blocked him. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misled by RonLar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was quite astonished by your last actions. I slept over it and want to clarify my earlier remark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd appreciate if you would be less generous with your slight innuendos (''&amp;quot;thanks for nothing!&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;misled by RonLar&amp;quot;''): these make it difficult to assume ''good faith'' on your side. And they have the annoying tendency to backfire...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*my statement ''&amp;quot;Where is the right place to propose an alternative viewpoint? Surely not in the article itself, but on its talk-page. This is a simple necessity for all protected articles, but a good idea for most of those articles some sysops feel strongly about.&amp;quot;'' is hardly misleading - even though it is not written by a native speaker! In fact, it is echoing the sentiments of Conservapedia's [[Conservapedia:Editing etiquette|editing etiquettes]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should discuss changes made by an Administrator before reverting their edits. Administrators are charged with seeing that article content is in line with Conservapedia guidelines. [[Edit war]]ring with an Administrator usually results in a temporary block.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should not alter the editorial content of an article away from a [[conservative]], or [[Christian]], or [[family friendly]] &amp;quot;tone&amp;quot; without discussing proposed changes on the talk page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'''Never make substantial edits to an article without discussing your changes first on the talk page. If you have a reasonable expectation that other editors will accept your change(s), the changes are just formatting / copy editing, you should proceed.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inserting an alternative viewpoint is most certainly a ''substantial edit'' - and the etiquettes advise you to discuss such an edit at first on the talk-page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So, I made a true statement, in accordance with Conservapedia's policy on editing, and you '''misread''' it. To reiterate: You weren't '''misled''', you simply '''misread''' it. And this misunderstanding (of your part) you took as a reason to erase the whole section and seemingly not to read the rest of my comment? Deleting a section on censorship is always a little bit ironic...  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*BTW: whether the article is protected or not is not of any interest for the discussion of censorship! A library does not only censor the books it throws from it shelves, but the books it doesn't allow into it shelves in the first place!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I put the whole section up [[User:RonLar|here]], so you can read it carefully again. Take your time, but nevertheless, react timely - you said that  would be important....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 12:05, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:At this point, I think it's become abundantly clear that complaining about censorship will get you nowhere.  I realize users will come up and be frustrated by certain site traditions, but that's just the way Conservapedia is run, RonLar.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 13:41, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry, I thought you were saying the article was protected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I'm astonished to think that you consider adding alternative viewpoints to be something that has to be '''cleared''' with a sysop first. My understanding of project policy is that all contributors are free to describe non-conservative, non-Christian views ... especially on an article describing a controversy between the two sides. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:38, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Apology accepted. Perhaps you could revert your reaction to this misunderstanding by reintroducing the section which you erased from your talk-page?&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please read [[User:RonLar#Again, the previous example of ideological censorship, in detail]] - all of it, not only the first sentence. This should answer some of your questions.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please address the incident which I mentioned there.&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 16:56, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Eh? I thought you wanted help. Please answer my question: Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:39, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::How is it a sensible use of my time to answer new questions  when you seem to ignore my answers to your old ones? Please remember your statements:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Unless you can show at least one diff, where a senior editor censored something ... merely because it disagreed with some conservative shibboleth ... than you ought to stop saying this. I address this not so much to you, as to those who follow you or travel alongside you.'' }}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::and&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''I asked for an instance of ideological censorship.''}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, you find it here: [[User:RonLar#Again.2C_the_previous_example_of_ideological_censorship.2C_in_detail]] Of course I am willing to answer any question concerning this specific example of censorship, especially those which indicate that you read the whole comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 02:41, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nearly two weeks later: Did you take a look? Or even better, did you read the whole thing? [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 18:17, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-Clancy cracks? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general I'm a Clancy fan but I think some of the criticism you removed was valid. For example by the time he wrote &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; his standards of research had perceptibly dropped (The AH-64 has a 20mm gun? Really?) and &amp;quot;Red Rabbit&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Teeth of the Tiger&amp;quot; were frankly rubbish. Maybe some of the criticisms should stay? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:09, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Anything can stay if properly sourced: X said Y about Z. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:10, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What would be an acceptable source? I have all Clancy's books; would they be acceptable sources for pointing out declining standards of technical accuracy? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:20, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::LOL, '''your''' interpretation of Clancy's writings would be (what is called at Wikipedia) original research. If you don't know what I meant by 'properly sourced', then you're unqualified to contribute anything further to this project. If you do know, you're just toying with me. Godspeed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough. What I'd do is reference both Clancy's books and technical sources that contradict them, such as the fact that the AH-64 does NOT have a 20mm gun. Like I said I'm generally a Clancy fan - &amp;quot;Without Remorse&amp;quot; may just be the best thriller ever written - but his last few books have been a bit disappointing and his research has definitely slipped. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:28, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What I would propose is to remove the comments about &amp;quot;The sum of all fears&amp;quot; - a nuclear weapon could be built with a table saw and a small lathe, never mind optical milling equipment - but keep and expand on the comment about the declining level of technical accuracy. The divergence of the Ryanverse from reality isn't important because it IS fiction, but the declining level of research and tendency towards unrealistic assessments of real-world capabilities IS important. For example &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; is utterly unrealistic even in the Ryanverse. If China invaded Russia they'd get about ten feet over the border before being annihilated. The fortifitions on the Sino-Russian border make the Maginot line look like a sand castle on the beach, and they were actually designed by strategic thinkers. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:44, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On second thought, maybe I'm being too hard on you. I recently started tutoring schoolchildren, and I'm learning to be more patient with their quaint notions. After all, making wrong guesses and getting them corrected is often the best way to learn. Shall I not condescend to grant you the same grace? ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've read all Tom Clancy's [[Jack Ryan]] and [[John Clark]] novels. I always assumed that any discrepancies were inserted on purpose; Clancy certainly would have no reason to put correct information on how to make a suitcase-sized nuclear bomb in his books: what conservative would want to inspire a copycat crime? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to include &amp;quot;criticism&amp;quot; by some published author who says an attack helicopter does or does not have a certain sized gun, go ahead. He's also not very accurate about the software used in the stock market, although it was a key plot element in ''[[Debt of Honor]]''. (Come to think of it, if a man knew everything and wanted to make money betting on horse races, he would know not to put all his winnings on the next race (&amp;quot;[[John Doe]]&amp;quot; TV series pilot). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:56, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Language ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Big_Bang_theory Language like this] makes me extremely uncomfortable: &amp;quot;when grownups talk&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;woman's logic is strange, don't you think&amp;quot;, etc. (especially this in his earlier statements: &amp;quot;and being educated briefly by my grandpa in matters &amp;quot;of faith&amp;quot;, mostly about &amp;quot;Catholic errors&amp;quot;, and the absolute need to be trufhful, my concern was that the Catholics are wrong on one more point since the Big Bang was proven wrong in 1985&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I am not a woman. My identity is very well known and I am quite easy to find. Ottava means eight, and Ottava Rima means Eight Rhyme, a type of rhyming pattern used in Italian epic poetry. Second, his language is condescending, misogynistic, religiously bigoted, etc. Third, his claims about the Big Bang Theory are rather strange, conspiratorial, and nothing I have ever heard by any legitimate scientist. I cannot honestly believe that he is a real conservative but I believe he is a plant just like many of the people who vandalize. His job is to produce some of the most absurd stuff to try and make conservatives look awful. If I am wrong, I am wrong, but his language does not seem like something that is appropriate. I talked to Geoff Plourde about this quite a bit tonight because it bothered me a lot. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:44, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Um ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism and obesity]] - is this a joke? It seems to be just a list of fat atheists. It even has random tidbits like &amp;quot;Chuck Norris endorses the Total Gym exercise system.[59]&amp;quot; I know many priests who are overweight, and many religious people who are. I know many atheists who are ultra thing and anorexic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Christian and Library of Congress researcher's explanations of reports of UFOs &amp;quot; How would that even deal with atheism and obesity? Yet it is in there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page looks like it was created to make Conservapedia and conservatism look really bad. Sigh. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:58, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:User:Conservative is good at attracting readership to this website. The [[Atheism and obesity]] seems to me a bit of payback for the liberals who call Rush Limbaugh a big, fat idiot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And in his payback, he demeans everyone who is overweight, including myself. I've dealt with mean-spirited behavior from people about weight the majority of my life - there is no acceptable reason for being hostile about the issue. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 16:53, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== You were looking for ideological censorship? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bestiality&amp;amp;curid=88619&amp;amp;diff=920267&amp;amp;oldid=920266 easy to find] --[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 23:52, 23 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not as easy as you say. See [[Talk:Bestiality]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:44, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Senior Admin assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, I would like to bring something to your attention as a senior administrator. I have been in private communication with User:SamCoulter over the last few weeks. There is nothing in his attitude and comments to me in private and his behaviour here on Conservapedia to suggest this user is anything but sincere. He was recently blocked for the edit [http://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/SamCoulter here] (the last edit he made - I will not link directly to it because the topics are extremely offensive and not family friendly). For this effort he was blocked for three months. His edit was a) relevant b) correct according to the article linked and c) was a link which was on the front page already. It seems that some users wanted to quote the article without implying the articles conclusions as they were at loggerheads with a users personal opinion. I don't think the user should have been blocked but now he is I won't remove it but I do believe that 3 months is extremely heavy-handed. I don't want to create controversy so I will not chnage the block myself but I am bringing this up with you and User:Karajou also (I am unable to contact the blocking sysop). Thank you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:11, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Keep him blocked. He vandalized twice. In fact, I am going to increase the time blocked. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:02, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Do you have evidence of this vandalism? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:04, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If you want to defend those recent contributions be my guest. If you want to wrangle with me about them, it is not going to happen. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I tell you now '''there was no vandalism''' you are blocking a user for adding sourced and factual material. You are blocking him for no reason! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but it's actually very easy to avoid a block. I suggest you start coaching new users about courtesy, project goals, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I myself disagree with the project goals of RW, but they haven't given me any long blocks. Why? Because I follow their rules in their house.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adolescents often have trouble figuring out what the rules are, or trouble realizing the benefits of following them. (In the long run, civil disobedience campaigns against beneficial institutions such as Democracy and Free Markets simply backfire.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:52, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I respectfully disagree with you. It's incredibly ''easy'' to get blocked on this site, because honestly, it appears to depend on the whim of the blocking editor (doesn't like what's being said because it's contrary to the blocking editor's opinion, got up on the wrong side of the bed, had a fight with someone in real life and are taking it out on editors here at CP.) You yourself just handed out an ''infinite'' block for ''defending'' someone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Many editors, myself included, have protested User:Conservative's articles and his method of defending them. If anyone objects, he automatically deems them an atheist/evolutionist, etc., which at least in my case, is far from the truth. I object to several things. First, his use of &amp;quot;obese&amp;quot; as a ''ad hominem'' attack against people whose ideas he disagrees with. I've dealt with bullying behavior about weight most of my life, and have tried to point out to him how hurtful his taunts are, but he thinks it's amusing, and the other sysops here (yourself included) appear to agree. I'm all for a good discussion about ''ideas'', but when the attacks become personal, and all-inclusive, then yes, I'm going to protest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Second, most of the articles are just ''badly, badly written''. They meander ''miles'' away from the original topic, they tend to be a bunch of quotes lumped together, and in many of them, the point that he's trying to make is missed completely. The actual subjects might be valid, and important enough to warrent an article on them, but creating 10 articles that say the same thing, and that can (and should) be consolidated into one, '''''well-researched and well-written document''''', is just poor scholarship. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:53, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, thank you for not giving me an excuse to block you! ;-) Very well written . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As I've said elsewhere, [http://ameriwiki.wikkii.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;amp;diff=4073&amp;amp;oldid=4071] I disagree with the stance of &amp;quot;the admin&amp;quot; who is making ''[[ad hominem]]'' attacks on atheists; I think it's a misguided attempt to attract readership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If anyone's had a '''good''' edit reverted for a bad reason, they can just let me know. Just remember: if anyone is criticizing to condemn, I'm not interested, but if they want me to change things, I'm the man who can do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:03, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BrentH's block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see you blocked BrentH for trolling and reverted 2 of his edits. He linked [[Professor]] to an existing article here on CP, [[Professor values]]. Why was that trolling? --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 19:55, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps prior edits?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 20:01, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::User: Ed Poor did not appreciate the section right above this one--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 21:14, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::BrentH made a perfectly reasonable and respectful suggestion. It would appear from the edit history that he was referring to an article about Winona Ryder, created by Ed Poor, which contained one piece of trivia but no basic information regarding the person whatsoever. What BrentH said is simply common sense, and I too cannot see how this can justify a block. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 22:45, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Indeed, certain longstanding members of this community seem to have rather thin skin.  I did not see BrentH's post as offensive or out of line--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 22:54, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This is an encyclopedia. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You wrote that on my talkpage. ''This is an encyclopedia.''. Well, if it is articles like [[bestiality and Britain]] ahould be deleted because, as I have pointed out numerous times, it has nothing to do with bestiality and Britain. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:27, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Article deleted. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=delete&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1]&lt;br /&gt;
::Hey thanks Ed. Just for the record though I wasn't &amp;quot;bothered&amp;quot; by the content so much as bothered by the ''lack'' of content. As the commandments say - everything must be true and verifiable which that article clearly wasn't. Many thanks. I must admit - I have a lot of respect for you and karajou. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ed, evolution was birthed in Britain and secularism has grown rampant in their country. Now their society is a mess and there is rioting in the streets. In addition, the'' Guardian'' just published a puff piece on bestiality. I say enough is enough and it's time their moral rot is exposed. I realize that pointing out that folly and consequences of atheism/evolutionism annoys liberals, but so what. Not only are they grossly and obviously in error, but atheists/evolutionists have shown themselves [[Atheism and cowardice|to be timid little bunnies]]. I restored the article because I feel confident that Conservapedia can stand up to foolish and timid little bunnies. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:21, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Enough with the insults conservative. I am neither a liberal nor an atheist and am sick to death of you accusing me of such. The article has nothing, I repeat '''nothing''' about the practice in Britain. I say again '''nothing'''. You poor scholarship is on show and we can ''all'' see it. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:02, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ed, a Brit was trying to bring over his deviant farming practices to the United States as can be seen [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7600523/British-man-51-arrested-at-bestiality-farm.html HERE]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:28, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::You misread the article, Conservative. The Oregon farm is owned by an American. The British man was visiting it. Read [http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-seattle/seattle-convicted-cocaine-smuggler-arrested-likely-into-bestiality-liking-sex-with-animals here] for a version of the story that makes who owned the farm clearer. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keldaby goats.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|An exclusive British art gallery was criticised for displaying a highly offensive bestiality oriented painting which featured a [[goat]] just yards from The Ritz hotel and where it could be seen by children.- The Daily Mail online (MailOnline), August 5, 2011 ''The explicit art that shows bestiality with a goat just yards from The Ritz'']]&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::There is no way I'd let children any where this site with Conservatives despicable articles all over the place. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Max, I heard Oregon was pretty liberal. It figures the farm was in Oregon. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:30, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::I heard that most states are pretty liberal... But that doesn't make the rumors true. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 22:34, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Oregon voted for Obama plus fairly recently they had the most atheists per capita in the United States. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:57, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Omaha, Nebraska also voted for obama but calling it liberal is very silly--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:58, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/new-poll-identifies-most-liberal-and-conservative-states/ Oregon is liberal] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:07, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm slightly confused as to why it's relevant or not that Oregon is liberal. After all the state DOES have a law against bestiality, so that argues against liberals being tolerant of it. --[[User:ColSharp|ColSharp]] 08:33, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Since when do liberals obey the laws on the books in the first place? This photo [http://www.conservapedia.com/File:1915b7ec753fa9d0352885dc23da4469.jpg] is proof that liberals have no intention of obeying laws regarding littering.  They trashed Washington D.C. ''when they got their way'', January 20, 2009.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:10, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's a law in New Jersey about recycling, yet I know several conservatives who refuse to recycle. Why is this? [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 13:26, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request for Admin assistance  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To all senior admins and sysops. I am being repeatedly abused by user:conservative who, among other things, accuses me continuously of being an atheist simply because I point out some of the holes in his articles. See [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;curid=113357&amp;amp;diff=924642&amp;amp;oldid=924636 here for the latest accusation]. I have asked him numerous times to desist with his sneering name calling as I find it offensive to have my faith questioned and nothing is ever done. He state’s I am atheist because I don’t agree with some of his ridiculous contentions. In actual fact it isn’t even that I disagree with him it is that I point out his shoddy research, poor scholarship and his berating, insulting and sarcastic behaviour towards others. I am of the opinion now that he is purposely calling me names because he knows I don’t like it which is unchristian, impolite and, above all, insulting. Is anyone going to teach this man some manners? Has Conservapedia become a place where Conservative is allowed to behave this way without any warning or comeuppance but all other editors and warned and blocked for minor infractions.  He is in continual violation of the commandments yet NOTHING is done whereas people like myself are always watching out to avoid being banned. Well, fine, ban me if you like. I probably will be after this posting and no doubt Conservative will cackle with glee at “winning” again. But laugh Conservative, you win nothing. I post this is full knowledge that I might be blocked banned and insulted by you in my absence and I have always remained polite and civil plus I can hold my head up high. Hopefully one of you will take a stand and insist on standards of civility. But I don’t hold out much hope. Thanks, many of you were kind, decent people whom I enjoyed working with and I pray for you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:21, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I am disappointed in you most of all Ed. Coming from wikipedia and being the first to jump on others for incivility you ignore when it comes to the ruling chaste of Conservapedia. You should be ashamed. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:48, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Max, I think you assume entirely too much about my dispositions.  You really don't know what extent I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; or if I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; at all. You also don't know what value I place on &amp;quot;winning&amp;quot;. In fact, you don't even know if I am one person or a team.  I/we remain inscrutable. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:24, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::User:Conservative, this is getting silly. You wrote for instance:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::''Actually KhalidM, I have a very outgoing personality and a university professor friend of mine told me that I would make a great administrator because I can be very diplomatic. While I realize that I will never cultivate a large atheist or liberal fan club, I can live with that. Conservative 20:34, 5 October 2011 (EDT) ''&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, while your grammatical gender may be undetermined, your number isn't. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:44, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== King George I ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article of [[King George I]] was deleted as a ''creation of vandals''. On the talk page I read the comment of User:RJJense: ''I added much new text, all of which I wrote, and previously posted on Citizendium.'' I looked up the article at Citizendium and it seemed to be quite informative - certainly not vandalistic! Could it be restored? I'd like to insert a valid link into [[elector]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I restored the last version by RJJense. I feel confident that his last version was a good article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:34, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks - it really seems so! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;New Ordeal&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I noticed that you placed the quotation marks around the term &amp;quot;New Ordeal.&amp;quot; As you have probably noticed I have been attempting to fix that article. Quite frankly, the article is pretty bad to start with and several of the references that prior authors cited have nothing to do with the topic. Do you know if there is procedure in which this article may be recommended for deletion? --[[User:Padams|Padams]] 15:33, 15 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Better to mark it as an essay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, 19 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block of AugustO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I looked at [[Conservapedia:Editor's_guide#If_you_get_blocked]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you get blocked, it's probably because you (1) broke the rules and (2) ignored hints, requests and/or warnings. So the first thing you should do is review your communications with others here, particularly those who are admins. Have you been trying to get along by following our practices and supporting our goals, or have you been trying to change our ways? If you are new here, it's best to go along to get along. After you have contributed a lot, we'll be more likely to listen to your suggestions, but breaking the rules will just end up with eliminating you from the project. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I can't think of any rule which I broke&lt;br /&gt;
::*I was requested to ''to do some charitable work somewhere instead''. I'm already engaged in such work, so this doesn't apply...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't try to ''change our ways''. I try to correct factual errors (e.g.,  ιδού can be translated as ''at this moment'' or that it is right to call ''Carolus Martellus'' the grandson of ''Carolus Magnus''.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Perhaps upon reflection you may realize that you'd rather be part of the project than insist on your own way. You might want to apologize and get unblocked. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't insist on my own way and I apologize if anyone feels insulted by my criticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you want to discuss your block, '''do not create a new account'''. Rather, use one of the following methods to appeal the decision (listed in order of preference). ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Here, I obviously failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. ''Contact the person who blocked you (see below).&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
2. ''If you get no reply after a reasonable amount of time, you may contact any Administrator.&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
3. ''Email cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com giving the name of the Administrator or editor who blocked you, and the date, and it will be forwarded on to them. &lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you contact more than one person about this, please do them the courtesy of letting them know who else you have tried contacting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
::*This should be obvious from the header of my emails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Contacting an Administrator or editor can usually be done by one of the following methods: ''&lt;br /&gt;
*''Use the &amp;quot;Email this user&amp;quot; link in the toolbox. This, however, will only work if both you and the Administrator or editor have enabled this on your/their respective accounts.&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Administrator or editor may have provided an email address or other contact information (e.g. AIM) on their user page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*This section seems to be obsolete: ''email this user'' doesn't work for any of the administrators I tried to reach. And I couldn't get Ed Poor's email address via his user page. So we are in a [[Catch 22]] kind of situation...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I emailed to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;aschlafy@aol.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;conservapedia@zoho.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. I didn't get any reply (is 1-2 days a ''reasonable amount of time'' to wait? I thinks so...) to my short email which stated: ''I understand that my criticisms of CBP and the World History Lectures are quite unwelcome, but they are hardly trolling! I'd appreciate if you lift my block.''&lt;br /&gt;
::*So I decided to create a new account to appeal the block, hoping that the advice against this action is as obsolete as other sections of the ''editor's guide''.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 07:56, 26 October 2011 (EDT) (AugustO)&lt;br /&gt;
:::August, I think you should start a career in sales. You certainly have the persistence to be a good salesman. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:47, 26 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed Poor, the block of AugustO is now more than a week old. I tried to reach you via various channels - could you please lift the block as the stated reason (&amp;quot;trolling&amp;quot;) doesn't apply? [[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 11:09, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please get a [[writing plan]] from him and get it to me, and I'll consider it. Meanwhile, any sysop is free to unblock him. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:01, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Is that any official Sysop, or anyone with Block rights? I'd be happy to unblock Mr O so that he can post his writing plan.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:25, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::On second thoughts, perhaps I'll just go ahead. Please reverse my action if I'm overstepping the mark.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:33, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thanks for the unblock!&lt;br /&gt;
*I read the article on the [[writing plan]], and I'll try to provide you with one. This would be easier if a ''sample plan'' were provided. But nonetheless, here it is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mainly I'm interested in the CBP. Mind you, I'm not ''Junker Jörg'', I'm not capable to create a translation on my own which stands for hundreds of years. But I think that translating the Bible in a group, and extensively discussing your work is a marvelous way to get a greater insight into the ''Book of books''.  While doing so, I try to dig into what Conservative calls the ''ANE culture'', as you can see [[Talk:John_1-7_(Translated)#Issue_with_translation_of_John_4:53|here]], where I try to shed light on timekeeping during the Roman empire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I came here, I thought that there would be a group of likewise interested individuals, but at the moment there seems to be only one other editor with similar interests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As my approach to the CBP generates quite a few edits on talk-pages, I balance these with edits to articles. These tend to by connected somehow with my namesakes (August of Saxony, Ernest August of Hanover), the history - or just happen on pages where I read something which puzzled me :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:21, 8 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion issue ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be a great idea to merge the articles. In fact, if you were interested in expanding the article, I might be interested in helping.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:28, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please help me organize this. We should give prominence to conservative views, but let's steer away from censoring liberal views. It would be nice if liberals could see '''why''' conservatives believe differently. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:43, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::OK!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:48, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged the articles and added a bit on abortion and political ideology. How is it?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:53, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks for the change but==&lt;br /&gt;
perhaps it should be bed bugs (plural), and now when i make an edit and it goes thru, if i try to make another one i get &amp;quot;Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it&amp;quot; but no one has. Going back to page and trying anew results in the same. 3.1: longetivity should be longevity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus is Lord, thanks[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 07:58, 5 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback here ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback [http://conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Panel_members.2C_please_give_your_feedback_below HERE]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your assistance would be much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:05, 16 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have explained my ideas in private email to you and Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:50, 11 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  a few messages to you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few messages to you here: http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Air_superiority [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:14, 26 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for picking up some of my &amp;quot;wiki litter&amp;quot; that I left behind (redirects to non-existent pages). I will try to be more diligent as far as not littering in the future. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:22, 11 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. And don't bother yourself: it's better for you to focus your time on building the wiki, while less talented contributors like myself do the routine housekeeping. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If I had your writing skill, I'd be making whole article like you do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:34, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A message to you from Cipe ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixing a MediaWiki message: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you perform the edit I described [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;oldid=992864#Edit_request here, on very bottom of the page]? I asked Aschlafly but he's probably busy now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 15:33, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know the basics of Wiki coding and not the advanced level coding. I would ask someone else. Try Ed Poor. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:32, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unfortunately, I cannot edit Ed's talk page. Could you suggest someone different? Or message him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The change is rather small and requires only copy-and-paste. More directly: you can copy contents of this: [[User:Cipe/MW_fix]] to: [[MediaWiki:Revision-info]]. Even if my suggestion is wrong, it can be reverted, so there is no danger. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 16:41, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, I did it. But where can I see the results? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:53, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you very much. You'll see it when checking older revision. Here is an example: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that MediaWiki has a different message when you're checking current revision. I'll prepare fix in a moment. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 17:55, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The message seems to have logged me out. I think it needs fixing. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:56, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I also got logged out, but only once. I can consistently see the new message now. Perhaps the software logs out when a edit to MediaWiki is made. Could you please copy [[User:Cipe/MW fix 2]] to [[MediaWiki:Revision-info-current]]? I promise it's the last change :) It is shown for a permalink to current revision. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:08, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't think that's it. I think you need to put the '''www.''' in front of '''www.conservapedia.com''' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It seems to work. I can see the messages: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546 for past revisions] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=992065 for current revision]. Thanks for changing. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:19, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you for unlocking your talk page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really appreciate being able to get in contact with you directly when the circumstances arise.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 18:39, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
Now he can try to justify what he said about the article. [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 14:29, 14 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== File:GoreFireBreathing.jpg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think it would be appropriate to use this image in the [[Current TV]] article? It's already in Gore's main article, so why not include it in the article about his obscure TV network on channel 9800 on my TV? --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:35, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== apology. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I just wanted to apologise for the comments I made related to you, they were impolite and unnecessary.  I don't have anything against you or anything, I just posted something that I thought was relevent without thinking how it would be taken by anyone other than myself, as it happened they were rude and quite personal.  I acknowledge that I behaved quite badly, and in future I will try to avoid giving you, or others, offense.  So..... virtual handshake?[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 06:18, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, don't be so dramatic. Just comment on the articles and issues of the day, and forget about personalities. That's how this project's supposed to run. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:33, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::lol. Nah it's difficult to tell over the internet how people are reacting, so for all I knew you could have been quite insulted or something, and I had to make sure that I was being very clear. Anyway, cool[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 01:03, 19 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not sure you get it: We don't want personal remarks on this wiki, clear or not. You need to be clear only about one thing: what you intend to write about an article topic. You must not comment on other users in any way. Is '''that''' clear? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== On Personal Attacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As someone who has been the subject of personal comments (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987753&amp;amp;oldid=987715], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987827&amp;amp;oldid=987777], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987956&amp;amp;oldid=987955], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=990739&amp;amp;oldid=990566]), I would like to share my opinion on Conservapedia's policy on personal attacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it is very appropriate to make '''relevant''' comments on editing and other wiki behavior to determine what the best practices are with regards to editing and other actions and, if necessary, to instruct users who may not know better about such practices.  For example, I have informed two administrators about redacting the automatically-generated deletion log entry to remove sensitive material.  I have also asked one administrator to include source information in that user's uploaded images, requests with which this user has complied.  Likewise, if someone has a habit of posting comments on talk pages without signing them, it is appropriate to inform them of how to sign posts.  Further, if someone is about to violate 90/10, a warning is definitely appropriate.  None of these have to do with the real-life '''personality''' that these editors, many of whom are brothers and sisters in Christ, have; these comments focus on on-wiki '''behavior'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, I think that if someone is going to make a statement regarding real-life facts or Conservapedia's commandments, policies, and best practices, it is appropriate to debate this statement '''without going into personality details'''.  Such debate may very well include Socratic or rhetorical questioning as a argumentative device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, Mr. Schlafly is the owner of the site, so he has the final say in this, but I'm sure he would agree with what I have written.  Although attacks on another editor's real-life personality should generally be removed, I do not see the need to remove good-faith debate and discussion over user '''behavior''' at Conservapedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for reading this.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 12:36, 21 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, thanks, Greg. If I err on the side of &amp;quot;absolutely nothing about the person&amp;quot; to an absurd point, please continue to help me out. I'm mainly opposed to comments like, &amp;quot;You're a jerk&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I don't have to follow the rules.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nothing wrong with '''friendly''' personal comments, like, &amp;quot;Thanks for pointing out that a rigid, absolutist enforcement of the rules may not be wise.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hey Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw your Arbcom case over at Wikipedia just today looking through for cases of bias there. :) Wikipedia's - nuts, huh? Lol. I ran into the Obama bias team over there in Scjessey, Wikidemon, and company, back in late 2009. It's become so hopelessly biased by now you've just got to laugh. They know they're keeping all controversy out of the Obama page and how biased they are, and don't care. Well, all my facts are at Conservapedia's services now. :) Anyway, just saying it's nice to see another ex-Wikipedian here I guess - hope we get some more! :) --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Jzyehoshua]] 01:15, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tehpwn3r==&lt;br /&gt;
'User names based on your real name or initials are '''preferred'''' does not state that you will be blocked. [[User:Conservative|Also]].--[[User:Wishnaka|Wishnaka]] 19:51, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inappropriate user name. It has been a general principle that one's user name be &amp;quot;based on one's real first name and last initial&amp;quot;, though there are a number of reasons why that is not always practical. The point is that we don't like the kind of foolish &amp;quot;handles&amp;quot; that are often used in various blogs and social web sites. If you run afoul of this by accident, you will be asked to create a new account, and doing so will not be considered sockpuppetry. Of course, some user names are essentially just vandalism, and are treated that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you don't object, I suggest shortening his block to maybe 3 days. His remark, while rude and impertinent, did have some substance, and a hard block doesn't serve to do anything but cause more unhappiness. Thanks for considering,&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 20:48, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you unblock him, you're responsible. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:54, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I recommend keeping the week. And don't &amp;gt; dont. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:01, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for pointing out the typo.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 23:35, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Michael Baumgartner==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
Please do a careful side-by-side comparison of [[Michael Baumgartner]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Baumgartner&amp;amp;oldid=509330054 the Wikipedia article]. I did a google search on &amp;quot;Michael Baumgartner&amp;quot; and came up with a number of sources including the Wikipedia article.  I took notes from all of the sources, and wrote a new article based on my notes.  I honestly believe that the article uses a different set of sources, covers ideas in a different order, and covers the topic differently than Wikipedia.  Please take another look, and if you agree, please restore [[Michael Baumgartner]]. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:05, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*I understand the workload you face. Could you please look at the article and reconsider? [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:51, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*:Already restored in good faith; I trust you, and I'm not going to compare it closely. I'll leave that to others. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:54, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My condolences ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the death of the Rev Dr Moon. [[User:JuanMotame|JuanMotame]] 18:54, 2 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome. I wonder if you could help me. I tried [[Special:MovePage/William. J. Fulbright]] but apparently I don't have permission. The page should be at [[J. William Fulbright]], the name of the founder of the Fulbright scholarship program.&lt;br /&gt;
:Done.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:26, 4 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sun Myung Moon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You changed the first sentence of the protected article on [[Sun Myung Moon]] from the present to the past tense. Could you take care of the rest of the article, too? Thanks. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:35, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Feel free to take care of that yourself. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I took care of it. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 13:21, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:32, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Requesting Assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Poor,  I'm relatively new here and don't completely know my way around.  Would you please look at my comment concerning [[Talk:American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel|American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel]].  If my view is in line with the site, I'm quite certain that a template or procedure is needed at this point.  If my views are not in line with the site, please feel free to remove that comment as you see fit.  You seem experienced here, so your guidance is requested.  --[[User:Nouniquenames|Nouniquenames]] 00:03, 21 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Psychological manipulation]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that you moved/redirected the above article to [[Essay: Psychological manipulation in the Bible]] on grounds &amp;quot;not a general article; case study uses a Bible story&amp;quot;. I've got somewhat confused about this step, because IMHO the article is general and only the case study section itself contains a &amp;quot;Bible story&amp;quot;. In fact the rest is a combination of various sources, some of them far from having anything to do w/ Bible at all. I was by far not completely done with that article and now I actually do not know how to continue working on it. It says now &amp;quot;This Is An Original Work. Contributors should add their signatures to the end section. If published, a notice will be posted and, if desired, contributors will be recognized.&amp;quot; but that was not my idea at all, I would be more than happy if anyone could help to extend that, in my opinion, general article. If I could suggest anything then I would like to suggest to move only the 'case study' section to the essay realms and keep the rest as general article with hyperlink to that essay in appropriate, perhaps 'See Also' section. I also deem as deficiency that article does not appear in the Psychology category now, I believe it belongs there.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:35, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Objections to evolution]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As for your rationale for redirect on 'Objections to evolution', namely &amp;quot;I thought we already had plenty of articles opposing the Theory of evolution&amp;quot;, I agree with you that &amp;quot;we have&amp;quot;, but still would dare to oppose the redirect on grounds that 'Objections to evolution' is an article that brainwashes people at WP and enjoys special defence by witch-hunters who heavily suppress any different points of view there thus I believe it is of significant importance to have available alternative view on the same topic under the very same title.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:50, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quote Templates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was doing some ''random page'' editing and found that there was a whole load of quote templates you created a while ago that link to nowhere and nothing seems to link to them. It seems the template for linking these quotes never got off the ground. I'm proposing that these either be deleted or put into some sort of quote page as I don't think there much use at the moment (except for possibly taking up server space). Kind Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 02:00, 2 November 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Unificationism]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I am not surprised to see you make changes to the Unificationism page in defense of  your church, but why did you remove the part in which Moon  told an interviewer,  &amp;quot;God is living in me and I am the incarnation of himself.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The whole world is in my hand and I will conquer and subjugate the world.&amp;quot;   [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19459920?print=true]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you saying the BBC made that up?  [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 08:23, 14 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can put that back in. Sorry for the delayed answer; my day job keeps me pretty busy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Be advised, though, that Rev. Moon himself disputed the ''conquer and subjugate'' quote, telling Newsweek interviewers that he had been quoted out of context. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, 20 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Way to stop the spammers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Aschlafly's talk page &lt;br /&gt;
Yesterday after I prayed an idea came to me (most likely from god) to stop the spammers from registering the spam accounts. If we can move away from user captcha and instead use a question that requires some knowledge (for example what team does tim tebow sit on the bench for or which team did he turned around) as the spambots will be completely flummoxed by this. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:16, 19 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The questycaptcha is excellent for this purpose. It stops ocr bots, and most paid spammers. The code would be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   require_once( &amp;quot;$IP/extensions/ConfirmEdit/ConfirmEdit.php&amp;quot; );&lt;br /&gt;
   $wgCaptchaClass = 'QuestyCaptcha';&lt;br /&gt;
   $arr = array (&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;A question?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;An answer!&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;What is this wiki's name?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Conservapedia&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        'Who is Tim Tebow' =&amp;gt; 'An athlete',&lt;br /&gt;
   foreach ( $arr as $key =&amp;gt; $value ) {&lt;br /&gt;
        $wgCaptchaQuestions[] = array( 'question' =&amp;gt; $key, 'answer' =&amp;gt; $value );&lt;br /&gt;
   }&lt;br /&gt;
Which you would place in /rootfiledirectory/localsettings.php[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:54, 19 November 2012 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Given your considerable experience in operating and maintaining wiki's like Wikipedia and convservapedia, do you think you would be able to implement this ? Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 05:12, 23 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A serious Biblical matter==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aschlafly wrote the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. This wouldn't have been to problematic, but now he puts his outlandish idea into an article in the main space ([[Epistle to the Hebrews]]). First he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''the most plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it.'''&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Iduan]] toned this down somewhat, so that we read at the moment:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''one plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it'''.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I couldn't find any Biblical scholar who shares this idea, I couldn't find any authorative figure who promotes this - and this isn't much of a surprise if you read the epistle for yourself!  The only &amp;quot;scholar&amp;quot; who has proposed this &amp;quot;theory&amp;quot; in the last 2000 years is Andrew Schlafly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to delete this sentence, and then I tried to make it clear that this idea is a personal insight by Andrew Schlafly. My edits were reverted:  any reader of this encyclopedia gets the impression that this theory is something commonly known or well discussed. That's utterly untrue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tend to be quite strict on Biblical matters - I'm often accused of being nitpicky.  As one of the sysops of Conservapedia who was active in 2012 I ask you to weigh in on this problem: maybe it is just me and most of the of you and your fellow sysops think that it is acceptable to present an  insight of a single person '''in a Biblical matter''' (an insight shared by virtually no one)  as a plausible theory. But - as the title of this section indicates - for me this is a very serious matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:26, 25 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree. Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, 5 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? &amp;quot;'' As I tried to convey with the phrase &amp;quot;this wouldn't have been to problematic&amp;quot;, there is nothing wrong with the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. But I think it ''is'' problematic that the ''insight'' of the essay spills over into a page in the main space, i.e., [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], and becomes a ''fact'' during this process.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree.&amp;quot;'' It's the other way round: stating the ''insight'' in an article in the main space without making it clear that the only source for this idea is Andrew Schlafly is lending it an improper credibility. If you read an unsourced, unmarked statement in an encyclopedia, the reader generally takes it as a kind of common knowledge, even more so if he is e.g., a high-school pupil.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:28, 6 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a mix of opinion and fact. Each is clearly marked. Talk pages are filled with unsourced claims, and we make very few efforts to police such talk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is currently an unsourced, unmarked statement in an article that needs attention, please point it out to me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you - if unsourced, unmarked statements are reintroduced into the article, I'll point them out to you! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:02, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im new here and need some help. I figured I would go to you since you seem very involved in the community. I recently tried to instate an article about R*tional Wiki and suddenly it was deleted. I thought since we had an article about Wikipedia that we could write about wikis. I also noticed that it had been deleted several times by the same people. Why? The words are spam filtered to. I feel that we need to write about the faults and propaganda of this completely biased website. Not to mention they completely badmouth you in the most rude ways. Please help...--[[User:Colesmithsayshi|Colesmithsayshi]] 14:18, 31 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mass Wedding ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was wanting to know what is the significance of mass weddings in the unification church ? I see your church has recently conducted it's first mass wedding since the very untimely death of the great Sun Myung Moo. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:05, 17 February 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not sure how to respond to messages. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not sure how to answer the message you sent me.  There does not seem to be a way to respond attached to the message you sent.  Do I just respond in this open forum?  Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Math ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings, Ed.  We haven't communicated in quite a while.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason I am writing is that I saw your recent [[Essay:Campaign_to_make_Conservapedia_unusable]].  I know that this has long been an issue, and that you and I have both put a lot of effort into making math/science articles accessible.  I have one comment about it:  ''Your audience for this essay is just yourself.''  All the people who made things inaccessible&amp;amp;mdash;Foxtrot, Lemonpeel, Jaques, etc, are long gone.  So, if you want the situation to improve, instead of writing an essay, you're just going to have to make the improvements yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I'm not sure what articles you have in mind for your criticism.  If it's all the topology stuff ([[Regular_space]], [[Sequentially_compact]], [[Hausdorff_space]], ...), you have my sympathy, and you will just have to delete them.  No one will improve them.  But I strongly advise you ''not'' to delete them.  They aren't doing any harm, and no one reads them (except me :-).  An encyclopedia is not judged by how esoteric its most esoteric articles are, but by how well its mainstream articles are written, and how well those mainstream articles cover the field.  I think the mainstream math articles at Conservapedia, like integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers, are pretty good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which brings me to my specific point.  It isn't true that no one edits math articles any more.  There was a small amount of activity on integers and natural numbers recently.  Perhaps this is what led you to write the essay.  I don't think there was anything over-the-top about the recent edits, and I think you sometimes over-react to things like this.  I believe that the recent edits in that area were well-intentioned, and trying to do a good job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving a really good definition of the integers or natural numbers, in the way that you and I would like, at the appropriate level but with real clarity, is ''impossible''.  Saying &amp;quot;evenly divisible by 1&amp;quot; doesn't work, because the reader who doesn't know what an integer is will have no conception of what division is or what &amp;quot;evenly divisible&amp;quot; means.  Saying &amp;quot;has no fractional part&amp;quot; doesn't work either.  I can see what the author intended--numbers are things like &amp;quot;3.7&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;.7&amp;quot; is the fractional part.  So, having no fractional part means it is something like just 3.  That's correct, but it relies on having an intuitive notion of real numbers, that is, things like 3 and 3.1 and 3.7 and 3.14159....  (Speaking of which, happy pi day!!!)  Now most people have an intuitive feel for numbers with fractions well before they have to think about a formal definition of natural numbers.  I know I did.  That is, I knew about &amp;quot;3&amp;quot; in the context of &amp;quot;3.7 without the .7&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;the biggest markings on a ruler, rather than all the small ones.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how do you write the article?  You do the best you can, giving an imprecise defintion in terms of &amp;quot;numbers that you count with&amp;quot;, or something like that.  (By the way, I really really liked your &amp;quot;mathisfun&amp;quot; web link explaining these things on an elementary level, and I used it (crediting you) in my article at Ameriwiki.)  So the right thing is probably to define &amp;quot;counting numbers&amp;quot;, as in the web link, and accepting that that's the best you can do.  Then address, very lightly, the issue of how that might be different from &amp;quot;natural numbers&amp;quot;, and whether zero is included, and so on.  It's not worth making a big deal about.  Just pick some definitions, and stick to them.  Mention that maybe not everyone agrees.  Don't worry about students getting a bad grade on an exam because of a nit-picking difference--people taking exams will presumably have attended a class and gotten the instructor's view on this, if the instructor thinks it's important.  The way you addressed the issue in the natural number article is just right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, the stuff about integers being &amp;quot;the only integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered and in which order is preserved by addition&amp;quot; is over the top.  Either take it out or move it to the very bottom.  Other than that, I think the natural number / integer articles are in pretty good shape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more thing:  Don't be put off by the fancy &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; symbol.  The people are not trying to show off.  The symbols are cool, and the students will think so.  When I was in junior high, I thought that the summation and integral symbols were really cool, long before I knew what they meant.  Let the students see them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I still say that the Peano axioms would be a good thing to have at Conservapedia.  Nowhere near as complicated as &amp;quot;integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered&amp;quot;, and really interesting for the target audience.  You may copy my Peano article from Ameriwiki if you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:34, 14 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just wanted to add my thoughts as a math graduate student who has made several edits to our math articles.  As someone who plans on becoming a professor, I think it is fundamental that, as an educational resource, Conservapedia has accessible (to the extent possible) math material.  However, we are not limited in space like a print encyclopedia, so there is certainly room for us to have more in-depth coverage of math topics for more advanced scholars.  It's not my intention to make Conservapedia unusable as an educational resource; if you think that my edits are not helpful, please feel free to discuss them with me.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:20, 15 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You may have missed my point, which is that 99% of our readers are concerned with math that is below the college level. I want the majority of our editorial effort in math to focus on what these readers need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 17 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed:  I take exception to your implication that I &amp;quot;missed your point&amp;quot; about the intended audience of CP, or how to write for it.  Be assured that I absolutely, totally, utterly, and completely understand these issues.  If you have any question about this, please see my articles on [[Limit (mathematics)]], [[Algebra]], [[Compass and straightedge]], and [[Cramer's rule]].  ''These are all topics that I studied in high school'', and I'm sure you did too.  In particular, I put an enormous amount of work into the limit article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, this stuff is entirely in your hands now.  If you have any problems with the math articles, you have the administrative power to delete any articles that you think are inappropriate, like the [[Kolmogorov space]] article.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:57, 4 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, thanks, brother wolf, for exposing your neck so meekly. But I have no desire to be top dog, if you'll excuse me for mixing metaphors. I'm glad you understand and work hard, and I hope you will help me make high school math (and below) accessible to the average reader - not just those in the top 1% like you and me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:47, 5 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must confess that I don't understand your metaphors very much -- brother wolf? exposing my neck?  I'm pretty clueless about contemporary culture.  But I know what &amp;quot;top dog&amp;quot; means.  There's no doubt that you are a top dog, being an administrator.  Also, I'm flattered to be considered in the top 1%, but, remember, there have been a lot of really sharp people here.  So I'm not sure about being in the top 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, good luck, and have fun.  And don't hesitate to delete stuff that you consider inappropriate.  Really.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll come by and look around and say hello from time to time.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:50, 11 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carbon Dioxide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have redone Brenden's edits in a number of different edits. I hope this helps you. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 07:01, 10 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It did. See my subsequent edits. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:23, 12 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Understanding Islam ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for this entry: [[Islam and tolerance]]. I followed the reference link to the news story &amp;quot;The Roots of Muslim rage&amp;quot;, and read the article. I thought it was really interesting, and as I am trying to better understand their beliefs and attitude towards us, (those of Christian faith and in Western Nations) I wanted you to know this was helpful to me, thanks. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:36, 15 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I put the article up for deletion; please contest me on it's talk page. Thanks, [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:29, 5 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I remember posting this thank-you to Ed Poor almost 3 months ago for making the page, as he referenced a very interesting article in the footnotes that helped me to better understand the position of Muslims. I had been trying to gain a better understanding of their point of view, and I found it very helpful. I'm surprised to see it up for deletion, since I don't think &amp;quot;one quote&amp;quot; pages are undesirable, as they often lead me to think more about a subject matter. Sometimes a little quote can lead to learning more about a subject. Why not add a little more information rather than try to delete the page? [[User:Taj|Taj]] 14:32, 6 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of your newer articles need some categories. I don't really know much about subject matter so would probably be better if you do it. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:03, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Feel free to place any category at all, when I'm too rushed to do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:18, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Normally I would, just not to familiar with some of subject matter. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:22, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Christian Chivalry==&lt;br /&gt;
I redirected your article on [[Christian chivalry]] to the already existing page [[Chivalry]] since they're the same concept and the other page was already much more in-depth. Hope that was alright. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:20, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did you complete the merge before reducing the page to a redirect? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:16, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not an admin, I don't think I can do a full merge like that... I figured since it was just a sentence and the sentiment of that sentence was already covered in the other article that the redirect would be sufficient... sorry. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 22:26, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you did your best in good faith, then no apology is needed. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll take a look later on, and if I think that quote is relevant I'll tack it on to [[Chivalry]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:28, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Talk:Gun control#New Infographic]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As you are one of the main contributors to the [[Gun control]] page, I'm writing here to ask you to follow the link I posted in the heading of this section and read the data I found. I think it could be very helpful to the article, but as I said there I'm far from an expert in interpreting that kind of data. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm interested in describing both sides in the [[Firearms debate]]. I don't think we have to overemphasize one side. Put in anything you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==fnarrow's reply to your terms==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just copy and pasting what he sent me, please don't shoot the messenger. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]], I agree to your terms unequivocally and will do everything I can on the future to not allow my emotions to get the better of me in the future. That said, I just want to take a second to point out that 2 of the 6 examples you gave of my behavior, (4 and 5 I believe, i do not have the other page open as I type this email) were not posted by me but were part of a comment posted by another user in response to my comments. The other 4 I do not deny and I agree that they were out of line. To that end, I would like to point out that if you or [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] look at the final interaction between myself and [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] in the &amp;quot;why complaints will go nowhere&amp;quot; section of that same page, you will see that we had settled our differences peacefully. It wasn't until after that that i was banned for earlier statements made in the heat of the moment and out of exasperation regarding the situation at the time they were made. I do not contest the justice of the 1 day block, but when it was immediately followed by the infinite block before I had a chance to respond, apologize or anything else, that was when I felt I had been treated unfairly and asked my friend to join the site as a conduit for contact. (thanks again John!) While I therefore still think the infinite block was unwarranted, i do apologize for my actions and will not allow it to happen again. Thanks for your time and i look forward to helping the site grow from this point forward. --fnarrow&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; btw, I'm not 100# sure what a &amp;quot;sock&amp;quot; is, assure you that to my understanding of the term I am not one. I have neither the time nor the inclination to edit your wiki and only made this account at my friend's request since he had no other contact anyone here. [[User:JSandler|JSandler]] 22:35, 28 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Karajou said I could unblock Fnarrow. I hope this turns out okay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:29, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fnarrow ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you be able to restore Fnarrows user and talk page whilst your at it mate ? [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:30, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:(this is [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]], I'm using [[User:JSandler|John(jsandler)'s]] phone at the moment as my IP is still blocked even though my user page shows that I have been unblocked by [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]]... Can that be fixed?) I wanted to thank everyone for helping me understand what happened and helping me get reinstated. I look forward to working with you all more in the future. Also, as [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] already posted, is it possible to have my user page and talk page content restored? Most of it can be deleted now that issues have been settled, but I'd like to recover other parts. Thanks again, [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]] 14:00, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ed, yes I can post again, I had assumed you had unblocked me... but I guess not based upon your comment on my talk page. Anyway, can you restore the content which was deleted from my user page and talk page? I don't know how to do that... Also, since you're a very knowledgeable Conservative and I consider myself to be a fairly knowledgeable Libertarian I'd be willing to work with you on the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page you created if you're still looking for someone to help with that project. Let me know. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 00:12, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked your username. Someone else seems to have unblocked your IP address; I don't know how to do that.&lt;br /&gt;
I'll leave your user and talk pages as C left them - ask him if he wants them undeleted. I'm just unblocking you, in light of your promise to chill out and be more focused on articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please start the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page, and I'll join in. Thanks! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:41, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we can do that although I am not good with wikis. From what i Understand, Libertarians are conservative when it comes to economics, gun ownership, small government, defence etc but are closer to liberals on other social issues. The way I understand it, libertarians believe the law should protect person and property, but go no further than that. I will do some research in the next few days, write a beta copy and forward to you for review/editing if thats ok&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Excellent, Patmac. I'll add that to the article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:22, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Homosexuality article and General protection idea/proposal  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[homosexuality]] article seems to be a bit broken. The table of contents is in the wrong position. Could you or another sysop please fix this ? Also I had an Idea re article protection. Would it be possible to protect some article so that only those users with '''edit''' and '''sysop''' rights edit them. This would allow those pages to be edited and improved by trusted and known users whilst stopping liberal trolls and thugs pushing their POV and vandalizing them. I think that something like this would help improve the quality and accuracy of the encyclopedia as it would allow for updates, improvements, tweaks and general formatting improvements to be made to our most popular articles [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:45, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For questions about rights (which involve software tweaks), talk to Andy. I can always unprotect an article at least temporarily. But if you want a longterm solution, I'm the wrong man to ask. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Odysseus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You should highlight quotes by including them in apostrophes: see [[Help:How to Code]] for a simple introduction - and follow [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052312&amp;amp;oldid=1052300 this link] for an example.&lt;br /&gt;
*If you include a link to a source just by using simple square brackets (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/odysseus.htm]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), it appears only as a number (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) in the text, similar to footnotes. But unlike those, it isn't listed in the references. To get it listed there, you have to include your link into &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; - tags. (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052314&amp;amp;oldid=1052313 this link] for an example)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 04:31, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps either AugustO or Ed Poor can help me, but other than on recent wikis where the quotation mark and the italic notation can be easily confused, I have never seen italic font used as a stand-alone indication of a block quotation.  I have seen italic used for titles of books or for emphasis or for foreign language words, but not as a replacement for quotation marks.  Any sources for this alternative would be appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 10:56, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:A very good question! Conservapedia states in its [[Conservapedia:Formatting conventions]]:&lt;br /&gt;
::''Italic sections of text are usually used to portion off a portion of text, indicating it is integral to the sentence without being part of its continuation. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:But while wikipedia don't like when you put quotes in italics &lt;br /&gt;
::''For quotations, use only quotation marks (for short quotations) or block quoting (for long ones), not italics. (See Quotations below.) This means that (1) a quotation is not italicized inside quotation marks or a block quote just because it is a quotation, and (2) italics are no substitute for proper quotation formatting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia doesn't address the matters (as far as I could see). Instead, Conservapedia offer some templates which try to do the job.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote}} or {{Q}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This template expects an author, so it can't be used in our special case:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Note how the text gets italicized, and is included in quotation marks: but this template is only used eleven times on this wiki. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote box}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quote box|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox2}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox2|quote=the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|source=John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:''QuoteBox2'' is used ten times on Conservapedia, ''Quotebox'' 422 times, ''Quote box'' only 1 time. Clearly they aren't very popular.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the most popular version, used over 1500 times. &lt;br /&gt;
:My conclusion: &lt;br /&gt;
:#The main feature of a quotation are - surprise, surprise - the quotation marks. Especially for short quotes, they shouldn't be omitted. I haven't used them regularly in the past (see the first quotations in this section), but I'll do so henceforth.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Conservapedia is mute on the use of italics to mark a quote. But perhaps we should follow wikipedia's lead and just don't do so&lt;br /&gt;
:#Indenting via ::: alone is not enough to mark a section as a long quote, at least &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; .. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; should be used - this indents the quote from the left and the right margin. A longer quotation should use one of the templates - best probably &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:Any thoughts? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:50, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My thought is that the last time we discussed a formatting issue, I tried to throw my weight around, and it didn't end on a cheerful note. So why don't I just follow whatever you recommend? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:24, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you.  I just want to say that I have never, ever thought of italics as conveying the limits of a quotation.  I always assumed that someone had put a printout of wiki-marked up text into an OCR scanner and it just got confused between double apostrophes and a quote mark.  I agree with your bottom line. Thanks [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 21:40, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neutral third party's viewpoint sought ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed.  I'd like to get your views on the discussion between another user and me that took place on my talk page.  It looks as if you recently blocked him over another matter.  I think he just tried to bully me for no good reason, but I'd like to hear what a senior admin thinks.  Thanks for weighing in if you get the chance.  [[User:DanAP|DanAP]] 00:14, 18 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I believe RontheDon and Bamorris9 are parodists--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 11:52, 20 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Propositional calculus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started that article.  It's a topic that you have, on several occasions (remember the &amp;quot;wff N proof&amp;quot; game?) expressed an interest in.  I urge you to fill it out.  Though I have a degree in mathematics, I do not know how to explain this topic at a high-school level, and I do not write about topics that I can't explain at a high-school level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also notice no activity on any &amp;quot;sciency&amp;quot; (STEM?) stuff over the last few months, from you or anyone else.  Have you lost interest?  I hope not.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 21:00, 1 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Susan Rice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please help me to expand the article [[Susan E. Rice]]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:29, 6 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I dont know how to put in a Officeholder-template. Can you please do it. Here are all informations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rice --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:32, 11 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edward Snowden ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should read [[Edward Snowden]]. That was my mistake. I might even have heard someone else mispronounce that.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:04, 12 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lukashenko ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please uploud this picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpeg ? Thanks--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 09:18, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For the [[Belarus]] article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No for the [[Alexander Lukashenko]]-article please.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:50, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess you mean [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_%28%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0%29.jpeg this picture.] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:yes and please uploud a picture of [[Nicolas Maduro]]. Like [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Canciller_de_Venezuela_y_Ofrenda_Floral_a_Bol%C3%ADvar_%284%29.jpg this] here--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:25, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:55, 3 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==RE:Categories==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're welcome! - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 12:09, 17 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flags and Coat of Arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud the flags and the coat of arms of the following countries: [[Guinea-Bissau]], [[Republic of China]], [[Benin]], [[Saint Lucia]], [[Saint Vincent and the Grenadines]], [[Ireland]] and [[Fiji]]. I already asked Karajou but he did´nt answered.--07:59, 21 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please uploud them.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:42, 28 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== quick reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a quick reminder. Please put category tags on your new articles. I would also try to have internal links to them from related articles (within articles or the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:04, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Your [[John Mighton]] and [[Learning styles]] articles need category tags and so do some of your most recent articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:11, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I will try to help out and add categories to a few pages in case Dr. Poor is too busy to do this immediately; he can always change the categories if he feels they don't fit. Thanks! [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:35, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservative, you are correct; thanks, Taj, for quickly filling the gap! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:19, 5 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read your article [[Ten year rule]] and it served as further impetus for me to see if this rule of thumb could be shortened via various techniques such as more rapid skill acquisition, improved memorization skills (mnemonics), increasing reading comprehension, time management skills, etc.  I found some additional interesting material on this matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as skill acquisition, a Christian I know came to the United States from Africa and became fluent in English though total immersion in English. He refused to speak his native tongue with his fellow countryman on campus. It worked. He obtained college level English skills within 3 months. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:17, 31 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Completing the square==&lt;br /&gt;
You might want to take a look at that article, and weigh in on whether it is &amp;quot;jargon&amp;quot; or otherwise pitched at an inappropriate level.  Perhaps I should have checked with you ''before'' going off the deep end.  I know that you share my interest in making the math articles accessible to the expected audience.  I believe that the topic of solving quadratic equations, and the quadratic formula, and the derivation of same by &amp;quot;completing the square&amp;quot;, are completely appropriate.  I also believe that the article covers this topic in a completely straightforward way.  (If they had used Hilbert spaces to prove the quadratic formula, that would have been a different matter!)  Anyway, feel free to put the jargon tag back if you think it should be there.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:20, 8 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't have to check with me before writing anything, and thanks for telling me about changes to [[Completing the square]]. I'm always interested in the reading level of articles, as well as any prerequisites a reader must have. The main point is not to be able to say, &amp;quot;All the information is complete and correct.&amp;quot; Rather, it is for the readers to leave here having learned or understood something which is important to them. In other words, it's not about us (&amp;quot;getting graded&amp;quot;) but about them (&amp;quot;getting edified&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:32, 9 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:See &lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic equations]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic formula]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[completing the square]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Hilbert spaces]] - way beyond [[high school math]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Jargon]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Accessibility of math articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikimedia Commons==&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud these images:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/78/Machno.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Rosa_Luxemburg.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Nicolas_Maduro_Moros.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:12, 16 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you please uploud these images also:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/Hassan_Rouhani_2.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:03, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You forgot this one: [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:12, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can you find one with an English title, instead of Russian letters? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:40, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure: [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:28, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:24, 22 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Here are the links again: '''[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG] [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]''' --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 12:15, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=upload&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1 upload log] and tell me which ones you still need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The links that I have posted over you.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:07, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Black man from Brooklyn.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not recall Conservapedia putting the race of the Sandy Hook, Aurora, or Sikh temple shooters on the front page of the website. Why do so this time? [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 12:06, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you think it's not relevant? There's been a lot of [[black on white]] crime lately. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think his blackness is as relevant as the whiteness of the majority of the spree killers in this country. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 22:15, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just went into one of your recent two sentence articles and it didn't have periods after the sentences. If you don't want to put in the effort to write an informative article and can't be bothered to even put periods after your sentences, then please consider not creating any more articles.  Andy just deleted one of our articles that was merely a quote. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe you are capable of writing good articles, but you are choosing to just slap &amp;quot;articles&amp;quot; together instead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are putting category tags on them now so you are taking some additional effort. But you need to put more effort in them if you are going to create them. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:50, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, how about [[Momentum]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:32, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== My response ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for my ill-tempered tone earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, this is what I would suggest and I will explain why below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Use this free tool to make it easy to create 400+ word articles: http://www.wordcounttool.com/ Your article was about 150 words long. This website is competing against other articles for people's attention and so keeping this standard will help this website better compete. Also, if you look at the search engine results, you will generally see the search results are at least 400 words long in length.  For example, see the search results for the word momentum here: [https://www.google.com/search?q=momentum&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high Search results for the word momentum]  and [http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=momentum&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;fr=moz35 More search results for the word momentum]. The articles are significantly over 150 words long. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People want longer articles that are at least 400 words. The search engines know this. That is why these type of articles are in the search engine results. So instead of creating three 150 word articles, write one article that is about 400 words or more. If a wiki has more search engine results, more traffic will be generated. If more traffic is generated, then more people will tend to sign up as editors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try to write articles that show up first in the search engines. Endeavor to do your best when writing an article. The Apostle Paul said, &amp;quot;Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but {only} one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.&amp;quot; (1 Corinthians 9:24).   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. If you use a quote, always cite it as students want a resource they can readily use and their teachers expect them to cite their sources for quotes. Here is a good format to use as it clearly shows the quotations around the quote plus cites the source of the quote: http://www.conservapedia.com/Socialism#Obama_administration_and_land_ownership&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for not responding in anger to my talk page post. I was planning to erase it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:34, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, put an attractive picture on your articles if possible. [[Flipperpithecus|This article]] ranks #1 at a popular search engine for a term as can be seen [https://www.google.com/search?q=flipperpithecus&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high HERE].  It features an attractive picture. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:11, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please review this block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been meaning to write to you about the block of EddyJ, but, first, something else has come up.  I believe that the recent block of DanAP is completely wrong.  He wrote a note [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Depression&amp;amp;diff=1068305&amp;amp;oldid=1068242 here], praising your work over the last six years, and was blocked for it.  I believe his note was sincere (and I happen to agree with it, by the way.)  Please do something about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the main issue is EddyJ.  He has been infinitely blocked, with the note &amp;quot;Ask Ed Poor before reinstating this person.&amp;quot;  I'm baffled by that note.  As you may know, I do extensive research of the people at Conservapedia; their interests; their viewpoints; their editing styles; and what kinds of fights they get into.  He has had some interactions with you, but nothing that would suggest that you have some special interest in his block.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He seems to be something of a hard-luck person in terms of being blocked.  He got blocked by you, by accident, which you retracted and apologized for 2 minutes later.  He got blocked 4 times by Markman, who was a vile character.  (I exchanged some email with Markman after his banishment from CP and RW; he's even more vile than you may realize.)  These blocks were clearly just Markman being destructive, and one was overturned by Andy.  Anyway, his relationship with you seems to be &amp;quot;interesting&amp;quot; but respectful.  (Rather like my relationship with you, or with Daniel Pulido&amp;amp;mdash;a very interesting person.)  His only fight with you was over the &amp;quot;Black man&amp;quot; issue, which I don't consider to have been very serious as fights go.  So please review his case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:06, 16 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Have him submit a [[writing plan]], and I'll discuss the matter with Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:36, 18 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me to expand the article [[Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst]] and dont forget the photos.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 14:07, 20 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== speedy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please look at the [[:Category:Speedy deletion candidates]] and delete some articles there.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 03:26, 16 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beethoven==&lt;br /&gt;
One finds wonderful things in unexpected places.  I happened to see your edit to the Beethoven article, with the reference to the BBC video series.  I've downloaded it.  3 parts.  It's wonderful!  You might also want to look at a similar 3-part series, also by Charles Hazelwood, about Mozart.  Both series are in three parts.  Go to the first one in each case, and you will see links to the other two.  I'd suggest putting all 3 links in the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections of the Beethoven and Mozart pages.  The first Mozart article is at [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrXpzOFknN0]; the other two are linked from there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, I'm not a great fan of putting in seemingly disconnected quotes, and I know other people have criticized you for the same thing.  I'd suggest saying something as a subsection of the line for the 9th, like &amp;quot;One commentator has said the Beethoven's ninth symphony &amp;quot;remains as potent, obsessive, and bewilderingly brilliant as ever&amp;quot;, giving the BBC link.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:21, 29 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5 maintenance tasks that need to be done - some of which could be automated - perhaps you could help as far as the automation of the tasks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some editors like to do wiki maintenance tasks. I started on two of these maintenance task, but I don't have the time to do it all myself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 maintenance task that need to be done: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1.''' De-orphan pages which have no category tags or links to them from other pages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2.''' Remove about 8% of the wiki pages which are ex-editors' user pages and user talk pages who have not edited in the last 3 years.''' And this task could probably be automated, but it could be done manually too.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a list of editors/users here: http://conservapedia.com/Special:ListUsers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you go through the list and put delete page tags on the user pages and user talk pages of users who have been inactive for 3 years, then those pages can be deleted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can also find the pages that need to be deleted by looking at the pages that have these templates on them and then see if the users have been active in the last 3 years: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AUseful+links and http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AWelcome  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3.''' Delete the templates that are never being used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4.''' Build up the 2 sentence stub articles so they have at least 500 words.  Using the random page search function, I estimate the stub articles are at least 30-40% of the wiki articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5.''' Within 10 years, about 50% of links become broken links. Xenu's Link Sleuth can crawl your website and find these dead links plus make a report: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, using this Firefox tool https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/linkchecker/ or this chrome tool https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/link-checker/aibjbgmpmnidnmagaefhmcjhadpffaoi?hl=en these dead links can be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did this link maintenance already for the atheism, evolution and homosexuality articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think these 5 maintenance tasks being done would enhance the user experience for the readers plus these are maintenance tasks that need to be done. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:37, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Automating some of these tasks ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mentioned Xenu's Link Sleuth above in order to help automate spotting the dead links. I think that deleting the the inactive editors who have not edited for 3 years could be automated as well. Maybe using something like [[User:EdBot]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:36, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I was teach math and English   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Master Yoda, welcome back you are! ;-) --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:18, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Call myself senior, I would not! :-) [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:53, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Great to see you again here, Ed!  I look forward to learning more from your edits.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:12, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Can you Help? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed. It's good to see you back. I have been wanting to join the [[Creationwiki]] and [[Citizendium]] encyclopedia projects. I recognized your name on both sites. Last year I asked on your talk page but you were away at the time. Now that you are back, can you tell me how can I get an account for [[Citizendium]]? There is a [[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:RequestAccount| forum for registering]] but they are testing it, and I do not want to give away my info without receiving my account. So, how can I request an account where I will be assured of receiving it? And, how do I get a [[Creationwiki]] account? I requested once, but I got no confirmation email either in my inbox or spam folder. It appears that Hotmail has problems. I don't think I will be requesting either at present, but when I am ready, how can I request without having to wait? [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I would like to tell you that I will still edit Conservapedia even after I join the above sites. I just will edit them in addition. I originally edited [[Wikipedia]], but I have left because I could not agree with the viewpoints there. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, I don't know anything about that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:10, 16 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== small request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, could you please put category tags on your new articles. For example, this article [[Rudd Weatherwax]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:26, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Category tags, got it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::re Category:Animal trainers, Category:Dog trainers, Category:American male film actors: [[Conservapedia:Editing_article_and_talk_pages#Categories|Unlike articles, categories are to be in title case (e.g. Australian Cities and Towns, not Australian cities and towns), and are to be plural where applicable.]] --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The recursion joke ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was used in Donald Knuth's ''The Art of Computer Programming'' in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And hello again!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to keep the math and science stuff from going off the deep end over the last couple of years.  Not really hard; you and I seem to have scared off the flamers pretty well.  But something came up very recently, that you might want to look at.  See the quadrupole stuff in [[Gravitational waves]].  It's beyond me, and I'm way too busy fighting lower-level battles at present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:24, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, Sam, I'm going to stick to the K-12 curriculum. That's what I know best. But it's great to be back! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Internet Explorer]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed. Years ago you had the article on [[Internet Explorer]] removed due to its poor sourcing, or, I am not sure what, but it is still on the talkpage. I have recreated the article with a screenshot at the side. I have posted this message to ask if you would like to help in developing the article. I am not very good at finding sources or researching, although I do what I can. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 23:01, 24 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet_Explorer&amp;amp;direction=prev&amp;amp;oldid=903283 this version] doesn't seem so bad - after 4 or 5 years. Do as you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:58, 28 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you. I have restored to that version, but retained the screenshot and the category of Internet. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 19:44, 29 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bots==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello!  As I mentioned on [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Bots_.28and_other_web_services_and_resources.29|Mr. Schlafly's talk page]], I was wondering about the possibility of trying to help CP by running a bot.  I have a limited understanding of PHP and this kind of bot, but am fairly tech savvy and have created and used other sorts of bots on occasion.  [[User:JDano|JDano]] mentioned that you are the only person of CP who has successfully set up a bot, so I just thought I would ask you what you think.  It seems to me this would be a nice thing to do, but I'm not exactly sure how to proceed.  I'm also unsure of whether Mr. Schlafly would approve of me trying this, and whether it would even work, or if this wouldn't work with the permissions level I have here.  I have a stable web server and a slightly less stable private server.  Any thoughts?  Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 15:23, 12 April 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you haven't disappeared, I might point out that my bot only worked with a previous version of MediaWiki. Let me know if you're still interested. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:44, 19 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm still here, and thanks for getting back to me!  I am also still interested, though I'm uncertain if:&lt;br /&gt;
#I am able to do this&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If I'm allowed to run a bot, since I'm not an admin&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If bots are even allowed on CP--someone thought they were altogether disallowed.&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If there is a sufficient need to a for for me to bother (and also bother others, like you)&lt;br /&gt;
::That is annoying that your bot isn't compatible with the update, but is there a way to take your basic code and put it into a new &amp;quot;adaption&amp;quot; framework?  As far as my own attempt, I'm finding a number of off-the-shelf &amp;quot;bots&amp;quot; which are freely available, but pre-configured for Wikipedia.  I don't know if they could be used or not, but it might be an option. Do you have any other thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 00:16, 20 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since my last post, I have gotten a few answers to my questions.  I also now have a working [[User:DavidB4-bot|batch edit bot]].  It has a lot of limitations and a few bugs, but it's a start.  I would like it if one of use could get a sort of vandalism reduction/reversion bot working, as you previously had.  I in no way want to steal the task from you, but if you can't get something like this working, I would appreciate some guidance as to what previously worked and how it failed.  In any case, I would very much like an improved edit bot, as what I have now is a simple, static cue of batch tasks to execute, either once or recursively. This is proving useful, but not as useful as I would like.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I deleted my user page, but still appears in the history. Please help me delete my pages at conservapedia.com and my conservapedia.com account. Please delete them.  (data-provider)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Merry Christmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Merry Christmas.gif|cebter|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merry Christmas!  And have a happy New Year's Day. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:49, 24 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Talmud and &amp;quot;taking things out of context&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I'm no anti-Semite. I may have my issues with the Talmud, but it strictly has to deal with how they treated God (not even Jesus, just God himself). And I would still fight to the death to protect Judaism and Israel itself especially from the likes of Islam, Stormfront, the KKK and the like. The types of Jews I do have immense respect for are the ones who adhere to the Torah only, or at least primarily.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second of all, surely you must have seen the parts in those quotes that specifically state where those quotes came from. And for the record, there were a few Jewish people who confirmed a lot of what was said in those quotes from the Talmud. Case in point: https://youtu.be/YSy6ENVAJlY And there was one person who converted to Christianity and testified what was in the Talmud. For example, Bernard Lazare, a French Jew who upon converting testified the Talmud's role in the Jewish revolts and also what actually was said in the Talmud.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third of all, I get enraged whenever someone claims I took something &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot;, and in fact am enraged with the phrase itself, because I only see it as an excuse to cover up bad things, like when people claim that Lenin took Marx &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot; when he did those evil things even when those were exactly the stuff Marx demanded that Communism should be done in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I used to naively believe that the Talmud was part of God's design, that the Jews still worshipped God even if they don't worship Jesus himself, but they don't, they if anything make him more like a plaything, and that I will NOT tolerate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:14, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, try to get a handle on your rage and focus your efforts on improving articles. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:21, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not actually enraged, or at least, I'm keeping a pretty tight lid on my rage, so I am getting quite a bit of a handle on my rage actually. Didn't resort to name calling. Anyways, I reverted your edit, because, 1., those quotes have been verified by countless people, some of whom were Rabbis themselves, and 2., if you really wanted to address that bit, you should have responded to it directly, not removed it. I also added your reply back in, though I had to change it slightly since, due to the quotes still being there, it wouldn't make sense to mention you removed the quotes. And again, those quotes weren't taken out of context, as even Yossi Gurvitz and Bernard Lazare verified those quotes were accurate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:24, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest you get back to what we were doing before you supplied all those Talmud quotes. Wasn't it something to do with Trump and a so-called &amp;quot;[[Muslim registry]]&amp;quot;? I could use some help with that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine, I'll help with that, as long as you stop taking those quotes out. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:28, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can appeal your block to Andy, Conservative, or any other admin. But issuing ultimatums and refusing alternatives is not a part of collaborative editing. Bye! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't making an ultimatum, nor was I refusing alternatives (if anything, I actually DID try to compromise by letting you retain your response while still keeping the quotes). Ironically, I WAS about to make a contribution to the Muslim Registry article when you blocked me. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 16:58, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sigh. You're right. I guess I was too hasty: no one else at Conservapedia whose opinion I value agreed with your block!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Forgive me? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009.  It is now registered and somewhat set up.  I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel.  Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering.  In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later.  If you are interested, please let me know!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:46, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you could implement this project, that would be excellent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable?  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The blue links on a dark red background is hard to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sorry for the late reply - I haven't been checking CP every day. Here is how to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 turn off] the background on the useful links, and here is how I [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 made the background light yellow]. Hope it helps. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:56, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, some people have started to edit Conservapedia and then quickly gave up because they didn't know how to edit a wiki.  I noted about 3 people who did this. There are probably many more who quit but didn't say anything. I added a link entitled &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot;.  But I believe there are various versions of the welcome template so my link is not on all welcome template versions. For example, the welcome template that JPatt uses didn't incorporate my &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot; link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the newest version of the Wikimedia software allow for WYSIWYG editing? In other words &amp;quot;What you see is what you get&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The newest version of the Wikimedia software does not have the counter at the bottom of the pages. I understand why Andy Schlafly likes the counters at the bottom. I like the counters too. I guess there might be an extension to add the counters to the newest version of Wikimedia. But after all is said and done, having WYSIWYG editing could greatly increase the participation rate at this wiki and lower the rate of people falling out because they don't know how to edit a wiki. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:40, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==== Here is the welcome to Wikipedia and it is much better and legible ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Plate of cookies.jpg|thumb|300px|Some cookies to welcome you! [[File:Face-smile.svg|25px]]]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]], Conservative! I am [[User:This lousy T-shirt|This lousy T-shirt]] and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Knox490|your contributions]]. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], or feel free to leave me a message on [[User talk:This lousy T-shirt|my talk page]] or type ''{{tl|helpme}}'' at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message!  I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Help:Contents|Help pages]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Article development|How to write a great article]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ten_Simple_Rules_for_Editing_Wikipedia Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia].&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Also, when you post on [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] you should [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] using four tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.  Again, welcome!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Conservapedia needs a better greeting. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:02, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks Ed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:05, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:37, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Done, but you've been around long enough. Why don't you ask Andy for blocking rights? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:39, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm confident he would use block right appropriately, but Andy might be hesitant to give the privilege to Sam.  Sam has been in a number of disputes, and has been banned a few times as well.  I'd support Sam getting the privilege, (I'd say he's more than earned it since I've been here alone, nevermind all the time before that) but I don't know if it could happen. Besides, aren't privileges generally given, not requested? --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:09, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::David, you have hit the nail right on the head.  Blocking rights are given, not requested.  And my long career here is full of blocks (19 of them), including blocks by people who were later revealed to be vandals or parodists:  DanielPulido and the notorious Markman.  And illicit blocks by &amp;quot;assistants&amp;quot; over content disputes.  (I seem to have a knack for upsetting bullies.)  And several blocks by my friend Conservative; we get along much better now.  And two by Ed Poor himself; I think we get along much better now; I won't bore you with the details.  When you've been around as long as I have, you develop a history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no interest in getting any special powers.  I like to think of myself as a &amp;quot;conscientious objector&amp;quot; in these wars.  People know that if they wrongly block me, I can't and won't fight back.  But others will (hopefully) undo the damage.  I think a lot of people respect me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But when big vandal attacks come along, and I can't get anyone else to take action, that's when I wish I had block powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you for your kind words.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::SamHB, you brought those blocks (none of which were &amp;quot;illicit&amp;quot; like you claim) down on yourself for the exact reasons DavidB4 pointed out, as well as for repeatedly and insistently putting liberal POV into some articles (including even now, with the [[fake news]] article two days ago) and for provoking fights (also including now). If you didn't insist on trying to turn Conservapedia into Liberalpedia, you wouldn't get chastized by the admins as much as you do. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It's true that I've had a hair-trigger for blocks, but you might not know that I often agonize over these and consult Andy by private email afterwards. It's not easy to admit that I've overstepped, but my record shows that I have SOMETIMES unblocked someone after a few moments (or days?) of reflection. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:31, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unrelated to what's above, Ed Poor, I see that several of your recent blocks have been indefinite. I used to do this a lot, but I no longer do because it can cause many innocent people to lose access to CP. Oftentimes, IP addresses get shifted around, so different, unrelated people end up using the same address at different times. That means that one indefinite block could affect many people over time. Also, vandals don't tend to be the type of people in a perminent location, so it is unlikely they will be using the same IP address after some time even if the address is the same in the same location. I recommend five-year blocks instead with even shorter blocks necessary for less serious vandalism. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;amp;diff=1304184&amp;amp;oldid=1303142 DavidB4 explained it better on my talk page.] Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:40, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== WOTUS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is [[Waters of the United States rule]] and [[Clean Water Rule]] the same thing? If so, they should be merged. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:48, 1 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The articles should be merged, although the two rules are slightly different. Can you do it? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:38, 2 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are many rules implementing the Clean Water Act.  Shouldn't you just have one comprehensive article about the Clean Water Act?  Also, we should have a separate article about the definition of &amp;quot;Navigatable Waters of the United States&amp;quot;, because this term defines federal jurisdiction in contexts beyond just the Clean Water Act.  It also defines the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers and the  old Federal Power Commission (now  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) with respect to the licensing of hydroelectric projects. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 04:54, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no objection, as long as readers will be able to understand what each of those hot-button phrases means, politically:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Navigable waters of the United States]] has nothing to do with navigation or shipping. It's merely a compromise between polluters and farmers on the one hand, and clean-water freaks or preservationists on the other. &lt;br /&gt;
:::*Similarly, the [[Clean Water Rule]] is not mostly about clean drinking water for people, but it also restricts legitimate (farm) use and delights the [[no-use]] environmental lobby&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The [[WOTUS]] rule is a variation on the Clean Water Rule that isn't so tough on farmers filling in a swamp (see [[Wetlands]]) to get more crop land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you two can make one article out of all this mess, go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi Uncle Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I'm finally here. I would love to get in touch with you again. You are a wonderful person, always very friendly. --[[User:Annie Poor|Annie Poor]] ([[User talk:Annie Poor|talk]]) 13:10, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Great to see you! ==&lt;br /&gt;
Great to see you, Ed!  Hope all is well.  It's fantastic to see a longtime friend again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:42, September 20, 2022 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi dear Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God bless you Ed Poor.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RobS is actually againt this LT behavior. &lt;br /&gt;
It's LT who blames Jews for Hitler, not RobS.&lt;br /&gt;
This is about LT, he just pasted it all from his talk page on to here.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:38, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice quotes on leadership on your user page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked the quotes on leadership that are on your user page.  I copied them to this page:  [[User:Conservative/Quotes]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:56, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hooray!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
You made my day, Ed!!!  So good to see you again.  I have the good memory of attending a certain college speech with you and others perhaps a decade ago.  So glad you're still active!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:57, October 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Larry Sanger==&lt;br /&gt;
I note you have good things to say about [[Larry Sanger]] who has professed his belief in [[Christianity]] in recent years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]] made the assertion that Larry Sanger was an [[atheist]] (totally untrue) and either [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=2070366&amp;amp;oldid=1976745 condoned or was a practitioner of bestiality] which was repeated in [https://therightscoop.com/why-should-a-conservative-bother-using-wikipedia/ conservative media]. After Sanger's conversion from [[agnosticism]] to Christianity I cleaned up the Wikipedia page and at least a half dozen other pages User:Conservative copy pasted his [[spam]] into. But he steadfastly refuses to clean up at least 342 other pages with his assertions, nor change his editing habits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:21, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Two decades ago, Larry said he was an atheist, but I never held that against him, particularly because I was at the time an active member in the most unpopular new religion in America. Both he and Jimbo Wales supported me as a preeminent expositor of &amp;quot;neutrality&amp;quot;. If there is anything that needs to be cleaned up, post it here or email me at uncle_ed_poor@yahoo.com. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:29, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Woman pilot accused of being a DEI hire ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Re: Woman helicopter pilot accused of being a DEI hire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;According to research and data, there is no significant difference in piloting ability between women and men, meaning women pilots can be just as good as male pilots when considering skill and competence; studies have shown that when factors like experience are controlled for, accident rates between genders are largely comparable.&amp;quot;[https://www.google.com/search?q=are+women+pilots+as+good+as+men&amp;amp;oq=are+woman+pilots+as+goo&amp;amp;gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCAgBEAAYFhgeMgYIABBFGDkyCAgBEAAYFhgeMggIAhAAGBYYHjIICAMQABgWGB4yCAgEEAAYFhgeMg0IBRAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBhAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBxAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMgcICBAAGO8FMgYICRAuGEDSAQkxNDY5NGowajGoAgCwAgA&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But there is a long tradition of blaming women for calamity and incompetence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. &amp;quot;Women driver&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Adam blamed Eve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. I am waiting for FAA to give their ruling and I am not pre-judging matters. I haven't been following this news story closely. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this clarifies matters. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:53, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think the executive branch criticism was for her being a woman - but for being inexperienced, and pushed into a job to fill a DEI quota. I'll try to follow up on that. Anyway, the DEI controversy is a major part of the story. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:58, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I just saw a news report at: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmpkoJhqUP8 FAA Academy struggled to fill classes over DEI quotas: Sen. Mullin]. The claim is that at the time of one of the recent crashes, the air traffic control tower was understaffed. This news report indicated that when you have DEI what happens sometimes is that a significant portion of jobs become not filled because they are looking for a DEI hire with the requisite skills to do the job when there are non DEI applicants who could do the job and are not hired. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:11, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, I think that is the Trump Administration argument. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:41, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2106045</id>
		<title>User talk:Ed Poor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2106045"/>
		<updated>2025-02-01T23:58:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: /* Woman pilot accused of being a DEI hire */ Thanks, C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Archive: &lt;br /&gt;
[[/1|1]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/2|2]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/4|4]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/5|5]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/6|6]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/7|7]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/8|8]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/9|9]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/10|10]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/11|11]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/12|12]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/13|13]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/14|14]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/15|15]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/16|16]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/17|17]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/18|18]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ed poor grinning.jpg|right|thumb|114px|Ed Poor on campus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- New comments at the bottom, please. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writing Plan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to submit a writing plan. While I haven't been asked for one, I feel this would best help keep me on task and contribute the most productively. You seem to know an awful lot about this wiki stuff, and I'm still new at it, so if you could help me that would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
I think I'd first like to help contribute to the various book articles around the site by adding in examples of the influence of Christianity, as a lot of books have Christian overtones that aren't currently listed. I'm thinking I'd like to start by drawing parallels between the story of Jesus in the Gospels with One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Please let me know if this would be acceptable.--[[User:JeremiahJ|JeremiahJ]] 18:10, 6 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably not. Please email me a draft. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 17 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor, I have submitted a request [[Talk:Atheism#Addition_of_Information_on_Charity_and_External_Links_Request|here]] but it was never attended to. Could you please have a look at it? Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:19, 28 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Image Upload Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
I am new here. Can you upload these images please.&lt;br /&gt;
https://puresocialnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/PA-Reg-Trends-1024x576.png&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.wikispeedia.org/seth_keshel_photo_2021-07-11_17-39-09.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I create Seth_Keshel page, but today its gone. Not sure how to proceed.&lt;br /&gt;
-James Pruett&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed Poor, I hope this message finds you doing well. I was wondering if you could upload [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Young_Galaxy_Accreting_Material.jpg this image] for use in the article I recently created. I look forward to hearing your response. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:32, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello Ed Poor, could you please add [[Atheism and the suppression of science]] to [[Template:Nb Atheism|this template]]? I really appreciate it! With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:14, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hello Ed Poor, I need two more images for the article I created which are available [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Independent_assortment_%26_segregation.svg here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Lennox.jpg here]. Recently, [[User:JMR10]] uploaded my previous one, for which I am thankful. Could you ask him to do the same for these two or could you please do these for me? I highly appreciate it. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:40, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I seem to have messed up the Ada article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My proxy keeps dropping stuff, so the picture at the top is busted.  Also, I had to cut down the reference, because the captcha can't make it through.  It should have a left bracket, and h,t,t,p, etc., and a right bracket after the &amp;quot;pdf&amp;quot;. I wonder if you could please fix it for me.  I will contact Andy about getting my IP range restored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I was going to put in the talk page (and will do once things get straightened out) is that the two cited articles are very shallow, having only 7 and 3 sentences, respectively.  They both refer to a &amp;quot;plan&amp;quot;, but that's because the word &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been coined in the computer context.  She really was the first person to write &amp;quot;code&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry about this.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:08, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I read her notes, and it doesn't look like a [[computer program]] to me. A charitable view might be that it's a [[specification|spec]], but there's no flowchart and no [[source code]]. Don't be sorry, just get it right. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:21, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What did you expect this &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; to look like?  The term &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; implies both a programming language and &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot; that the source code is assembled or compiled into.  Assemblers, compilers, and programming languages wouldn't be invented for another hundred years (by Grace Murray Hopper, John Backus, and others.)  The same goes for the other accoutrements of modern software development, like flow charts and specifications.  In fact, even the terms &amp;quot;software&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been invented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, assuming that you accept that she had to write &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot;, what would you expect machine code to look like for a machine that reads its instructions with rods poking through holes in large punched cards running around on a track, and does its arithmetic by counting teeth on turning gears?  It wouldn't look much like Intel 586 code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact is, the lines of Ada's written algorithm were intended to be punched into lines of holes in Babbage's cards, once the &amp;quot;analytical engine&amp;quot; was built, which it wasn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, what I was being &amp;quot;sorry&amp;quot; for was not the content of my edit, but the fact that an extremely buggy proxy messed up the article and wouldn't let me fix it, despite several tries.  Andy has been working with me to fix the network problems, and DMorris fixed the broken picture and hyperlink while my access was broken.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 20:39, 6 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then it would be more accurate to say that she described an algorithm. That's not the same as a computer program, even if she was hoping that Babbage's machine might be programmed to carry out the algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An encyclopedia should be precise and unbiased, not used to create &amp;quot;factoids&amp;quot; for use in publicity campaigns, such as promoting [[women in science]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't say she had to write machine code, but rather to be the &amp;quot;first programmer&amp;quot; she would have had to produce a [[computer program]]. If you have seen it, please show it to me. Otherwise, I'm going to make an editorial decision that she produced an algorithm rather than a program. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:18, 7 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Let's say that [[Ada Lovelace]] wrote one of the first comprehensive descriptions of an algorithm to generate [[Bernoulli numbers]]. But until I see the actual sequence of instructions, including [[if-then]] or [[loop control]] statements, I'd hesitate to call it an actual [[computer program]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:17, 17 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The anti-Semitism of liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
I love how libs reveal their true selves.  No matter what we say or do in describing them, they come here just to confirm it all.  So when they want to emphasize &amp;quot;Jew&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;karajou&amp;quot;, I'll be more then happy to get a gold Magen David to wear around my neck, join my brothers and sisters in the synagogue every week, and show everyone else just how hate-filled and intolerant these liberals really are.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:20, 12 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please help! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! I tried to add the information for Edo to the Tokyo article and for some reason,. it stripped a bunch of stuff out when I saved. Now when I try and revert the edit I made, I keep getting a internal server 500 error. Please can you revert for me? [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:19, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's ok, I fixed it! [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:30, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm glad it worked out for you. My Japanese name is &amp;quot;Edo&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:04, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice speed on reverts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You beat me to every one! Nicely done--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:05, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. I'll pass that on to my secret bot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:10, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks for noticing me ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must be doing something right. Every time I mention alternate viewpoints, and no one sees fit to revert my edits, I get vandalism to my talk page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:48, 10 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jeb Bush ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm trying to reorganize the information, not leave it out. If you notice, I'm working on the article quite a bit. May I please revert your revision? [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:05, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sure. I'm frequently too bold and hasty. And that's the wonderful thing about a wiki. Nothing is ever really deleted; it's all in the article history. Go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:09, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technical question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm lobbying for a separate namespace for the Conservapedia Bible Project. The idea is that each verse gets its own ''article'', which can be used rather as a template. I see a couple of advantages:&lt;br /&gt;
*verses can be quoted more easily: instead of copying the whole verse, only a short link (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; ) is neccessary to get a neat result: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*thereby, the use of the CBP is encouraged over other translations.&lt;br /&gt;
*if there is a change in the CBP, the afflicted verses don't have to be tracked down manually, but the change is applied automatically throughout the wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To accomplish this, a new namespace has to be created. That shouldn't be too difficult, as there are only a few exemplary pages prefixed with ''CBP:'' at this moment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But after this, the namespace has to be filled with the existing translated verses. My question: is your bot up to this task?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 10:53, 8 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== madonna ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, please strongly reconsider your desire to create a &amp;quot;kinder article.&amp;quot; In stating that madonna is a person who has changed to being more spiritual you are buying to the liberal media's lies. It sounds like a madonna fan attempting to weave their bias in, which of course you are not. I think you may want to do more research, and read my recent additions as she is still, if not more so, a wicked and hateful person who has sucked millions of children into raunchy culture, dated murderers and mocked our Lord Jesus Christ who gave his life for us. Madonna deserves only the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:14, 14 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And I just had a long conversation with some Wikipedians in Central Park last month, about whether CP is more neutral than WP. Now you want &amp;quot;conservative bias&amp;quot; to denounce [[Madonna Ciccone]]? Not even Wikipedia's BLP policy would allow that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder whether you are a liberal '''tempting me''' to add bias, just so you can accuse us of being biased. Well, if so, I choose not to cooperate, my dear elf. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:45, 14 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Legolas here might be a parodist. Would you mind looking into him? [[User:NickP|NickP]] 00:12, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, your compassion sounds a little misplaced to me. Do you also visit the Fred Phelps, Bernie Madoff, Ted Bundy, and Charles Manson pages asking people for some &amp;quot;Christian charity&amp;quot; to tone those down too? Look into me all you want please. I dislike Madonna because she has mocked our lord Jesus Christ. Conservative people have respect for Christ end of story. The reason society has degraded is by giving raunchy people like madonna a free pass and pity. I'm the one who wants to print the ACTUAL history of madonna that the liberal media has left out such her dating the felon Chris Paciello. I only want the truth about her in the article. Why is that so bad? I thought this was the one place that might allow the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:34, 17 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ed, can you please look into this guy? He is an obvious parodist. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 15:55, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
First of all - Ed is a senior sysop at this site - I don't know why a few of you have taken upon yourself to post on [[User talk:Aschlafly|Andy's talk page]] when Ed is more than capable of dealing with an alleged parodist on his own. Secondly, just because he is posting radical things on a talk page does not make him a parodist. Looking at his contributions, you ''could'' argue that he is edit warring, but since Ed is simultaneously the user in the revert war and an admin, it is up to his judgement as to whether or not a block is deserving. Your collective alarmism has now spread across three talk pages. That's enough.--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 16:00, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::@NickP, your very.... quick to call somebody else a parodist. Why not leave that to the pro.'s to decide?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:06, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Several others have also pointed out the fact that he acts very suspicious. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:13, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Saying he &amp;quot;acts suspicious&amp;quot; and saying he's a 100% no way im wrong about this Parodist is two completely different things.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:16, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I prefer what Wikipedia old-timers used to call &amp;quot;soft security&amp;quot;. Just help me fix the articles in question. Everything will sort itself out. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:34, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==EdBot==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I left three (actually six) problem Categories that need some sort of merging at [[User_talk:EdBot]]. Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, EdBot did not survive the MediaWiki upgrades. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:21, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Does that mean it's all got to be done manually? Moving 200 entries into another Category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Only if they really have to be moved. (Meanwhile, if anyone has an idea how a bot can &amp;quot;log in&amp;quot; with the new MediaWiki software, let me know.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot#Logging_in This] should help. Indeed, the whole [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot page] is quite interesting. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:40, 19 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A request concerning recent events ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm very sorry to come to you with this, but I honestly don't know where else to turn at this point.  You have always struck me as the voice of reason and level-headedness here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply put: the current altercation on Andy's talk page is out of control.  I recognize that I have no authority to tell sysops what they should or shouldn't do, but it seems to me that basic common courtesy calls for not filling up Andy's talk page with arguments and accusations.  Moreover, the very public nature of the dispute is encouraging other users to join in.  Some of them are doubtless sincere; others, I suspect, may in fact be parodists seeking to fan the flames (I notice a LOT of recently created accounts.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless, the fact remains that Andy's talk page has been turned into a general forum for accusations and arguments.   At this point, it's degenerated to the level where people are making absolutely vicious personal attacks against certain of the participants.  (Kudos to JamesWilson for promptly reverting the most egregious of these.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know the other sysops better than most of us; you talk to them; I would certainly hope they trust and respect your opinion.  Is there anything you can do to persuade them to take a step back, cool down, and wait for Andy to respond at this point?  Everyone involved has made their positions clear; further acrimony can serve no useful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry to trouble you with this, but I really feel that this is both inconsiderate to Andy and deleterious to the Conservapedia project as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:05, 28 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the vote of confidence, but shouldn't I check with Andy before barging in? It may be that he prefers to let everyone air their opinions. It is not just his courage but his wisdom and compassion that attracted me to this project. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:59, 5 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[User:MRellek]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, per the site owner, Administrators [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Guidelines&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=892763 &amp;quot;instructions...are to be followed&amp;quot;] is no longer operable. I have emailed you a copy of Mr. Schlafly's approval.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, sorry. I was hasty. Feel free to unban MRellek, if you feel I was out of line. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, Ed. I'm trying to get the other sysops to do more warnings &amp;amp; shorter blocks; let's get a sense of community here. After all, we've known many of these editors (the RW neighbors) for several years now.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:37, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel. I invited someone to edit Conservapedia and they were blocked and they should not have been. I got the block overturned. So I think there is room for improvement in Conservapedia's blocking policy. You can sign up [[User:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. I invited active Syops/Admins plus people with blocking rights who might wish to be Sysops. If I left anyone out, please let them know about the panel.  The people with blocking rights can sign up [[User talk:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. The panel will probably convene when Iduan is back from his summer vacation or fairly soon afterwards.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:47, 13 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think I got signed up somehow, after jumping into a discussion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can we have non-sysops on the panel? I'd like to invite a friend from Wikipedia to join it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:00, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== If I understand correctly, you are the local math expert. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If so, maybe you can take a look at [[Relativistic mass|this]] and some of that editor's other contributions. They seem pretty obscure/specialized for the general reader, to me, at least. Thanks! [[User:MrMorganH|MrMorganH]] 10:15, 14 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not an expert, but I know a lot about high school math. Andy's brother knows much more than I do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:55, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Revert ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good morning (afternoon?) Ed, why was my comment reverted? I can't see why it should be? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:54, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gosh, you're quick on the trigger. See your talk page for my response. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:58, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I am indeed quick on the trigger, I like Westerns you see..:-)  I have responded to you on my talk-page and re asked the question in a more cordial manner. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:59, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Conservapedia  Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings have begun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel proceeding have begun here:  [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings]] You can start making your edits to the page should you wish to do so.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:59, 17 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Farewell ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, in all sincerity you are by far the most interesting person I have met at Conservapedia.  I regret that we couldn't get along better, though we did manage to improve a number of things.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:12, 18 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We'd have gotten along better if we more goals in common. Building a trustworthy encyclopedia apparently was not one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=893745 this drive by attack] you dodged my request for specific instances of the problem you complained of. (Note: saying &amp;quot;all of them&amp;quot; is a a typical liberal dodge. That's like global warming alarmists saying, &amp;quot;Just look at the temperature record; the evidence is all there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For those listening in to this fascinating drama, the difference between real science and liberal junk science is that real scientists provide examples of what they're talking about, so that anyone can check it out and see for themselves. Liberals and other pseudoscientists '''pretend''' that they've already made the point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It reminds me of Japan, which always (1) says that it &amp;quot;already apologized&amp;quot; for the [[comfort women]] episode while steadfastly (2) refusing ever to admit that it did anything wrong. They are hoping we'll all be too polite to mention that #1 contradicts #2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice try on the parting shot, but your pretense of trying oh so hard fools no one. You're always welcome to come back if you '''ever''' choose to help this project instead of undermining it with trickery. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pontiac==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for your help archiving my page.  I know you are very experienced with Wikis, but I was wondering why you removed what I wrote about the government shut down of Pontiac destroying American history.  A lot of people were really upset about Pontiac's closure and there are lots of websites and articles proving this, why can't it be in the article?  I will differ to your judgement because you are so experienced, but just want to understand your reasoning. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 22:46, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can't be in the article until you find a way to make it trustworthy. Use references. You can't just write stuff off the top of your head, because you are not an established author. You are in fact an anonymous person, and we don't even know whether Craig is your real name. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If there's a lot of proof for your assertion, be sure to provide references, like:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The New York Times reported that after GM was taken over by the government, brands like Saturn and Pontiac were sold or eliminated (link and/or date)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you need help formatting references, lots of people here can help. But '''you''' must supply them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:43, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Pictures==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, how do I add pictures?  --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 16:08, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can't add pictures, until you've made enough useful contributions to earn upload rights. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:34, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In addition, Craig, you can use [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]] until you earn uploading privileges. A Sysop will do it for you.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 21:59, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll work even harder to earn my rights!   I also wanted to apologize for being so familiar, my mom pointed out that I should be calling you Mr. Poor. I always call adults by their last names in real life, but on the internet I usually forget.  Also thanks Mr. Wilson for your advice about upload requests. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 13:24, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::No worries. I wouldn't mind if you called me James or Jim, but I'm glad your mother has taught you well. Also, you will need a lot more work to earn uploading privileges, just so you know. Happy editing in the meantime!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 14:21, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit conflict ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just got edit conflicted by you on the Morse code page - what are the odds we'd both be working on it! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:19, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One thought leads to another ... not such long odds. Sorry about stepping on your work. Feel free to revert, and I'll recover later. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Its all OK, I added my work to your version. Great minds think alike, more like an average mind in my case but you catch my drift...:-) [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:24, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== signature ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you don't mind, but I borrowed the format of your signature to use for my own. It's simple and to the point, but looks nice as well, so I thought I would use it as well. Thank you! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:02, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I copied mine from someone else, so &amp;quot;[[Pay It Forward]].&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:27, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, ok. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:23, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== like wikipedia? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i looked up [[milk]] and [[butter]] how is this conserivtive? is it like wikipedia at all what can i add? ty. --[[User:Rainbowboiz|Rainbowboiz]] 00:35, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not unless your spelling improves. And we are not so much &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; as [[trustworthy]]. Unlike Wikipedia, we really do try to avoid political bias. Add anything that is correct and useful. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:17, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meat Loaf ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know his stage name is much better known (I'm writing the article on him, obviously), but wouldn't you think using the subject's real name is more appropriate for an encyclopedia? If you think the article should be titled under his stage name, you're the boss, but I thought I might want to point that out. Thanks!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 11:14, 1 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me as I am fairly new to this wiki.  I have attempted to propose a discussion for deletion on this particular page.  Before disccussing this, I have followed the instructions on templates via the help index [[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Articles_for_deletion]] to add it to a discussion for deletion but this does not seem to work so I have not proceded further - with hindsight I should have guessed there was something wrong by the lack of entries on this page.  &lt;br /&gt;
My reason for wishing to commence this discussion is that I suspect the article (created by a user who does not appear to have an active talk page) seems to me to be parody and trolling to debase the credibility of this project.  In my opinion, most of the logic followed in nearly every assertion is spurious and often uses blatant synthesis that a ten year old could question.  It is to such an extent that I don't think an &amp;quot;improved&amp;quot; version would be posible.  Of course, others may have different oppinions which is why I am trying to be fair and open it for rational discussion.  What is the correct procedure?  Thank you in advance - answer to my talk page [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 19:54, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure what the correct procedure is. Maybe you could post on the talk page, showing a few examples of &amp;quot;spurious&amp;quot; assertions. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:46, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok I can do this, but I'm surprised that hte Help feature supplies a redundant page on discoussing articles for deletion.  I was also under the impression that you had Sysop/Admin powers and would be familiar with such policies as it is a feature on other wikis.  [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 13:31, 8 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually I know policy fairly well and do have Sysop/Admin powers. Either provide the requested examples, or drop the matter. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:47, 10 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sid 3050 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sid 3050 was blocked for three month for ''trolling''. The only edit he made during the day before his block seems to be to answer to your question in a section above (''So, will it go away if you ignore it?'') - see his [[Special:Contributions/Sid 3050|list of contributions]]. You had personally addressed this comment (''But I'll take a look at Sid's material below now, just to be a good sport.''), so you should be able to judge whether such a comment is ''trolling''. Could you please review Sid's block? In a timely fashion? Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 09:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sid was trolling. Whether this justifies a three month block is up to the admin in question. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm always open to suggestions for making Conservapedia more trustworthy. If you have anything specific in mind, please speak up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of particular interest to me would be any material relating to the contrast between conservative and liberal viewpoints on American political issues, as well as philosophy, religion and science. To my regret, repeated invitations to include users who are ideological opponents of this project have not met with an enthusiastic response. It's almost as if they wish to conceal their ideological differences; ironically, this could be seen as self-censorship. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If anyone wants to describe liberal POV here they may, provided only that it is clearly labeled as such - not presented as gospel. This should not be an onerous requirement: it's the same as Wikipedia's NPOV policy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:42, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Help! A user called CortA is currently vandalising articles. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:15, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, Andy blocked him. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misled by RonLar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was quite astonished by your last actions. I slept over it and want to clarify my earlier remark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd appreciate if you would be less generous with your slight innuendos (''&amp;quot;thanks for nothing!&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;misled by RonLar&amp;quot;''): these make it difficult to assume ''good faith'' on your side. And they have the annoying tendency to backfire...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*my statement ''&amp;quot;Where is the right place to propose an alternative viewpoint? Surely not in the article itself, but on its talk-page. This is a simple necessity for all protected articles, but a good idea for most of those articles some sysops feel strongly about.&amp;quot;'' is hardly misleading - even though it is not written by a native speaker! In fact, it is echoing the sentiments of Conservapedia's [[Conservapedia:Editing etiquette|editing etiquettes]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should discuss changes made by an Administrator before reverting their edits. Administrators are charged with seeing that article content is in line with Conservapedia guidelines. [[Edit war]]ring with an Administrator usually results in a temporary block.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should not alter the editorial content of an article away from a [[conservative]], or [[Christian]], or [[family friendly]] &amp;quot;tone&amp;quot; without discussing proposed changes on the talk page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'''Never make substantial edits to an article without discussing your changes first on the talk page. If you have a reasonable expectation that other editors will accept your change(s), the changes are just formatting / copy editing, you should proceed.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inserting an alternative viewpoint is most certainly a ''substantial edit'' - and the etiquettes advise you to discuss such an edit at first on the talk-page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So, I made a true statement, in accordance with Conservapedia's policy on editing, and you '''misread''' it. To reiterate: You weren't '''misled''', you simply '''misread''' it. And this misunderstanding (of your part) you took as a reason to erase the whole section and seemingly not to read the rest of my comment? Deleting a section on censorship is always a little bit ironic...  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*BTW: whether the article is protected or not is not of any interest for the discussion of censorship! A library does not only censor the books it throws from it shelves, but the books it doesn't allow into it shelves in the first place!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I put the whole section up [[User:RonLar|here]], so you can read it carefully again. Take your time, but nevertheless, react timely - you said that  would be important....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 12:05, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:At this point, I think it's become abundantly clear that complaining about censorship will get you nowhere.  I realize users will come up and be frustrated by certain site traditions, but that's just the way Conservapedia is run, RonLar.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 13:41, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry, I thought you were saying the article was protected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I'm astonished to think that you consider adding alternative viewpoints to be something that has to be '''cleared''' with a sysop first. My understanding of project policy is that all contributors are free to describe non-conservative, non-Christian views ... especially on an article describing a controversy between the two sides. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:38, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Apology accepted. Perhaps you could revert your reaction to this misunderstanding by reintroducing the section which you erased from your talk-page?&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please read [[User:RonLar#Again, the previous example of ideological censorship, in detail]] - all of it, not only the first sentence. This should answer some of your questions.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please address the incident which I mentioned there.&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 16:56, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Eh? I thought you wanted help. Please answer my question: Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:39, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::How is it a sensible use of my time to answer new questions  when you seem to ignore my answers to your old ones? Please remember your statements:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Unless you can show at least one diff, where a senior editor censored something ... merely because it disagreed with some conservative shibboleth ... than you ought to stop saying this. I address this not so much to you, as to those who follow you or travel alongside you.'' }}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::and&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''I asked for an instance of ideological censorship.''}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, you find it here: [[User:RonLar#Again.2C_the_previous_example_of_ideological_censorship.2C_in_detail]] Of course I am willing to answer any question concerning this specific example of censorship, especially those which indicate that you read the whole comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 02:41, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nearly two weeks later: Did you take a look? Or even better, did you read the whole thing? [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 18:17, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-Clancy cracks? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general I'm a Clancy fan but I think some of the criticism you removed was valid. For example by the time he wrote &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; his standards of research had perceptibly dropped (The AH-64 has a 20mm gun? Really?) and &amp;quot;Red Rabbit&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Teeth of the Tiger&amp;quot; were frankly rubbish. Maybe some of the criticisms should stay? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:09, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Anything can stay if properly sourced: X said Y about Z. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:10, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What would be an acceptable source? I have all Clancy's books; would they be acceptable sources for pointing out declining standards of technical accuracy? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:20, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::LOL, '''your''' interpretation of Clancy's writings would be (what is called at Wikipedia) original research. If you don't know what I meant by 'properly sourced', then you're unqualified to contribute anything further to this project. If you do know, you're just toying with me. Godspeed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough. What I'd do is reference both Clancy's books and technical sources that contradict them, such as the fact that the AH-64 does NOT have a 20mm gun. Like I said I'm generally a Clancy fan - &amp;quot;Without Remorse&amp;quot; may just be the best thriller ever written - but his last few books have been a bit disappointing and his research has definitely slipped. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:28, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What I would propose is to remove the comments about &amp;quot;The sum of all fears&amp;quot; - a nuclear weapon could be built with a table saw and a small lathe, never mind optical milling equipment - but keep and expand on the comment about the declining level of technical accuracy. The divergence of the Ryanverse from reality isn't important because it IS fiction, but the declining level of research and tendency towards unrealistic assessments of real-world capabilities IS important. For example &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; is utterly unrealistic even in the Ryanverse. If China invaded Russia they'd get about ten feet over the border before being annihilated. The fortifitions on the Sino-Russian border make the Maginot line look like a sand castle on the beach, and they were actually designed by strategic thinkers. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:44, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On second thought, maybe I'm being too hard on you. I recently started tutoring schoolchildren, and I'm learning to be more patient with their quaint notions. After all, making wrong guesses and getting them corrected is often the best way to learn. Shall I not condescend to grant you the same grace? ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've read all Tom Clancy's [[Jack Ryan]] and [[John Clark]] novels. I always assumed that any discrepancies were inserted on purpose; Clancy certainly would have no reason to put correct information on how to make a suitcase-sized nuclear bomb in his books: what conservative would want to inspire a copycat crime? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to include &amp;quot;criticism&amp;quot; by some published author who says an attack helicopter does or does not have a certain sized gun, go ahead. He's also not very accurate about the software used in the stock market, although it was a key plot element in ''[[Debt of Honor]]''. (Come to think of it, if a man knew everything and wanted to make money betting on horse races, he would know not to put all his winnings on the next race (&amp;quot;[[John Doe]]&amp;quot; TV series pilot). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:56, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Language ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Big_Bang_theory Language like this] makes me extremely uncomfortable: &amp;quot;when grownups talk&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;woman's logic is strange, don't you think&amp;quot;, etc. (especially this in his earlier statements: &amp;quot;and being educated briefly by my grandpa in matters &amp;quot;of faith&amp;quot;, mostly about &amp;quot;Catholic errors&amp;quot;, and the absolute need to be trufhful, my concern was that the Catholics are wrong on one more point since the Big Bang was proven wrong in 1985&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I am not a woman. My identity is very well known and I am quite easy to find. Ottava means eight, and Ottava Rima means Eight Rhyme, a type of rhyming pattern used in Italian epic poetry. Second, his language is condescending, misogynistic, religiously bigoted, etc. Third, his claims about the Big Bang Theory are rather strange, conspiratorial, and nothing I have ever heard by any legitimate scientist. I cannot honestly believe that he is a real conservative but I believe he is a plant just like many of the people who vandalize. His job is to produce some of the most absurd stuff to try and make conservatives look awful. If I am wrong, I am wrong, but his language does not seem like something that is appropriate. I talked to Geoff Plourde about this quite a bit tonight because it bothered me a lot. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:44, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Um ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism and obesity]] - is this a joke? It seems to be just a list of fat atheists. It even has random tidbits like &amp;quot;Chuck Norris endorses the Total Gym exercise system.[59]&amp;quot; I know many priests who are overweight, and many religious people who are. I know many atheists who are ultra thing and anorexic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Christian and Library of Congress researcher's explanations of reports of UFOs &amp;quot; How would that even deal with atheism and obesity? Yet it is in there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page looks like it was created to make Conservapedia and conservatism look really bad. Sigh. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:58, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:User:Conservative is good at attracting readership to this website. The [[Atheism and obesity]] seems to me a bit of payback for the liberals who call Rush Limbaugh a big, fat idiot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And in his payback, he demeans everyone who is overweight, including myself. I've dealt with mean-spirited behavior from people about weight the majority of my life - there is no acceptable reason for being hostile about the issue. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 16:53, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== You were looking for ideological censorship? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bestiality&amp;amp;curid=88619&amp;amp;diff=920267&amp;amp;oldid=920266 easy to find] --[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 23:52, 23 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not as easy as you say. See [[Talk:Bestiality]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:44, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Senior Admin assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, I would like to bring something to your attention as a senior administrator. I have been in private communication with User:SamCoulter over the last few weeks. There is nothing in his attitude and comments to me in private and his behaviour here on Conservapedia to suggest this user is anything but sincere. He was recently blocked for the edit [http://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/SamCoulter here] (the last edit he made - I will not link directly to it because the topics are extremely offensive and not family friendly). For this effort he was blocked for three months. His edit was a) relevant b) correct according to the article linked and c) was a link which was on the front page already. It seems that some users wanted to quote the article without implying the articles conclusions as they were at loggerheads with a users personal opinion. I don't think the user should have been blocked but now he is I won't remove it but I do believe that 3 months is extremely heavy-handed. I don't want to create controversy so I will not chnage the block myself but I am bringing this up with you and User:Karajou also (I am unable to contact the blocking sysop). Thank you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:11, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Keep him blocked. He vandalized twice. In fact, I am going to increase the time blocked. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:02, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Do you have evidence of this vandalism? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:04, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If you want to defend those recent contributions be my guest. If you want to wrangle with me about them, it is not going to happen. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I tell you now '''there was no vandalism''' you are blocking a user for adding sourced and factual material. You are blocking him for no reason! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but it's actually very easy to avoid a block. I suggest you start coaching new users about courtesy, project goals, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I myself disagree with the project goals of RW, but they haven't given me any long blocks. Why? Because I follow their rules in their house.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adolescents often have trouble figuring out what the rules are, or trouble realizing the benefits of following them. (In the long run, civil disobedience campaigns against beneficial institutions such as Democracy and Free Markets simply backfire.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:52, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I respectfully disagree with you. It's incredibly ''easy'' to get blocked on this site, because honestly, it appears to depend on the whim of the blocking editor (doesn't like what's being said because it's contrary to the blocking editor's opinion, got up on the wrong side of the bed, had a fight with someone in real life and are taking it out on editors here at CP.) You yourself just handed out an ''infinite'' block for ''defending'' someone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Many editors, myself included, have protested User:Conservative's articles and his method of defending them. If anyone objects, he automatically deems them an atheist/evolutionist, etc., which at least in my case, is far from the truth. I object to several things. First, his use of &amp;quot;obese&amp;quot; as a ''ad hominem'' attack against people whose ideas he disagrees with. I've dealt with bullying behavior about weight most of my life, and have tried to point out to him how hurtful his taunts are, but he thinks it's amusing, and the other sysops here (yourself included) appear to agree. I'm all for a good discussion about ''ideas'', but when the attacks become personal, and all-inclusive, then yes, I'm going to protest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Second, most of the articles are just ''badly, badly written''. They meander ''miles'' away from the original topic, they tend to be a bunch of quotes lumped together, and in many of them, the point that he's trying to make is missed completely. The actual subjects might be valid, and important enough to warrent an article on them, but creating 10 articles that say the same thing, and that can (and should) be consolidated into one, '''''well-researched and well-written document''''', is just poor scholarship. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:53, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, thank you for not giving me an excuse to block you! ;-) Very well written . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As I've said elsewhere, [http://ameriwiki.wikkii.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;amp;diff=4073&amp;amp;oldid=4071] I disagree with the stance of &amp;quot;the admin&amp;quot; who is making ''[[ad hominem]]'' attacks on atheists; I think it's a misguided attempt to attract readership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If anyone's had a '''good''' edit reverted for a bad reason, they can just let me know. Just remember: if anyone is criticizing to condemn, I'm not interested, but if they want me to change things, I'm the man who can do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:03, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BrentH's block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see you blocked BrentH for trolling and reverted 2 of his edits. He linked [[Professor]] to an existing article here on CP, [[Professor values]]. Why was that trolling? --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 19:55, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps prior edits?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 20:01, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::User: Ed Poor did not appreciate the section right above this one--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 21:14, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::BrentH made a perfectly reasonable and respectful suggestion. It would appear from the edit history that he was referring to an article about Winona Ryder, created by Ed Poor, which contained one piece of trivia but no basic information regarding the person whatsoever. What BrentH said is simply common sense, and I too cannot see how this can justify a block. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 22:45, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Indeed, certain longstanding members of this community seem to have rather thin skin.  I did not see BrentH's post as offensive or out of line--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 22:54, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This is an encyclopedia. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You wrote that on my talkpage. ''This is an encyclopedia.''. Well, if it is articles like [[bestiality and Britain]] ahould be deleted because, as I have pointed out numerous times, it has nothing to do with bestiality and Britain. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:27, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Article deleted. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=delete&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1]&lt;br /&gt;
::Hey thanks Ed. Just for the record though I wasn't &amp;quot;bothered&amp;quot; by the content so much as bothered by the ''lack'' of content. As the commandments say - everything must be true and verifiable which that article clearly wasn't. Many thanks. I must admit - I have a lot of respect for you and karajou. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ed, evolution was birthed in Britain and secularism has grown rampant in their country. Now their society is a mess and there is rioting in the streets. In addition, the'' Guardian'' just published a puff piece on bestiality. I say enough is enough and it's time their moral rot is exposed. I realize that pointing out that folly and consequences of atheism/evolutionism annoys liberals, but so what. Not only are they grossly and obviously in error, but atheists/evolutionists have shown themselves [[Atheism and cowardice|to be timid little bunnies]]. I restored the article because I feel confident that Conservapedia can stand up to foolish and timid little bunnies. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:21, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Enough with the insults conservative. I am neither a liberal nor an atheist and am sick to death of you accusing me of such. The article has nothing, I repeat '''nothing''' about the practice in Britain. I say again '''nothing'''. You poor scholarship is on show and we can ''all'' see it. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:02, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ed, a Brit was trying to bring over his deviant farming practices to the United States as can be seen [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7600523/British-man-51-arrested-at-bestiality-farm.html HERE]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:28, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::You misread the article, Conservative. The Oregon farm is owned by an American. The British man was visiting it. Read [http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-seattle/seattle-convicted-cocaine-smuggler-arrested-likely-into-bestiality-liking-sex-with-animals here] for a version of the story that makes who owned the farm clearer. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keldaby goats.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|An exclusive British art gallery was criticised for displaying a highly offensive bestiality oriented painting which featured a [[goat]] just yards from The Ritz hotel and where it could be seen by children.- The Daily Mail online (MailOnline), August 5, 2011 ''The explicit art that shows bestiality with a goat just yards from The Ritz'']]&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::There is no way I'd let children any where this site with Conservatives despicable articles all over the place. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Max, I heard Oregon was pretty liberal. It figures the farm was in Oregon. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:30, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::I heard that most states are pretty liberal... But that doesn't make the rumors true. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 22:34, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Oregon voted for Obama plus fairly recently they had the most atheists per capita in the United States. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:57, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Omaha, Nebraska also voted for obama but calling it liberal is very silly--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:58, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/new-poll-identifies-most-liberal-and-conservative-states/ Oregon is liberal] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:07, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm slightly confused as to why it's relevant or not that Oregon is liberal. After all the state DOES have a law against bestiality, so that argues against liberals being tolerant of it. --[[User:ColSharp|ColSharp]] 08:33, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Since when do liberals obey the laws on the books in the first place? This photo [http://www.conservapedia.com/File:1915b7ec753fa9d0352885dc23da4469.jpg] is proof that liberals have no intention of obeying laws regarding littering.  They trashed Washington D.C. ''when they got their way'', January 20, 2009.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:10, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's a law in New Jersey about recycling, yet I know several conservatives who refuse to recycle. Why is this? [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 13:26, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request for Admin assistance  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To all senior admins and sysops. I am being repeatedly abused by user:conservative who, among other things, accuses me continuously of being an atheist simply because I point out some of the holes in his articles. See [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;curid=113357&amp;amp;diff=924642&amp;amp;oldid=924636 here for the latest accusation]. I have asked him numerous times to desist with his sneering name calling as I find it offensive to have my faith questioned and nothing is ever done. He state’s I am atheist because I don’t agree with some of his ridiculous contentions. In actual fact it isn’t even that I disagree with him it is that I point out his shoddy research, poor scholarship and his berating, insulting and sarcastic behaviour towards others. I am of the opinion now that he is purposely calling me names because he knows I don’t like it which is unchristian, impolite and, above all, insulting. Is anyone going to teach this man some manners? Has Conservapedia become a place where Conservative is allowed to behave this way without any warning or comeuppance but all other editors and warned and blocked for minor infractions.  He is in continual violation of the commandments yet NOTHING is done whereas people like myself are always watching out to avoid being banned. Well, fine, ban me if you like. I probably will be after this posting and no doubt Conservative will cackle with glee at “winning” again. But laugh Conservative, you win nothing. I post this is full knowledge that I might be blocked banned and insulted by you in my absence and I have always remained polite and civil plus I can hold my head up high. Hopefully one of you will take a stand and insist on standards of civility. But I don’t hold out much hope. Thanks, many of you were kind, decent people whom I enjoyed working with and I pray for you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:21, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I am disappointed in you most of all Ed. Coming from wikipedia and being the first to jump on others for incivility you ignore when it comes to the ruling chaste of Conservapedia. You should be ashamed. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:48, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Max, I think you assume entirely too much about my dispositions.  You really don't know what extent I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; or if I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; at all. You also don't know what value I place on &amp;quot;winning&amp;quot;. In fact, you don't even know if I am one person or a team.  I/we remain inscrutable. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:24, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::User:Conservative, this is getting silly. You wrote for instance:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::''Actually KhalidM, I have a very outgoing personality and a university professor friend of mine told me that I would make a great administrator because I can be very diplomatic. While I realize that I will never cultivate a large atheist or liberal fan club, I can live with that. Conservative 20:34, 5 October 2011 (EDT) ''&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, while your grammatical gender may be undetermined, your number isn't. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:44, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== King George I ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article of [[King George I]] was deleted as a ''creation of vandals''. On the talk page I read the comment of User:RJJense: ''I added much new text, all of which I wrote, and previously posted on Citizendium.'' I looked up the article at Citizendium and it seemed to be quite informative - certainly not vandalistic! Could it be restored? I'd like to insert a valid link into [[elector]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I restored the last version by RJJense. I feel confident that his last version was a good article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:34, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks - it really seems so! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;New Ordeal&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I noticed that you placed the quotation marks around the term &amp;quot;New Ordeal.&amp;quot; As you have probably noticed I have been attempting to fix that article. Quite frankly, the article is pretty bad to start with and several of the references that prior authors cited have nothing to do with the topic. Do you know if there is procedure in which this article may be recommended for deletion? --[[User:Padams|Padams]] 15:33, 15 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Better to mark it as an essay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, 19 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block of AugustO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I looked at [[Conservapedia:Editor's_guide#If_you_get_blocked]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you get blocked, it's probably because you (1) broke the rules and (2) ignored hints, requests and/or warnings. So the first thing you should do is review your communications with others here, particularly those who are admins. Have you been trying to get along by following our practices and supporting our goals, or have you been trying to change our ways? If you are new here, it's best to go along to get along. After you have contributed a lot, we'll be more likely to listen to your suggestions, but breaking the rules will just end up with eliminating you from the project. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I can't think of any rule which I broke&lt;br /&gt;
::*I was requested to ''to do some charitable work somewhere instead''. I'm already engaged in such work, so this doesn't apply...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't try to ''change our ways''. I try to correct factual errors (e.g.,  ιδού can be translated as ''at this moment'' or that it is right to call ''Carolus Martellus'' the grandson of ''Carolus Magnus''.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Perhaps upon reflection you may realize that you'd rather be part of the project than insist on your own way. You might want to apologize and get unblocked. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't insist on my own way and I apologize if anyone feels insulted by my criticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you want to discuss your block, '''do not create a new account'''. Rather, use one of the following methods to appeal the decision (listed in order of preference). ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Here, I obviously failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. ''Contact the person who blocked you (see below).&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
2. ''If you get no reply after a reasonable amount of time, you may contact any Administrator.&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
3. ''Email cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com giving the name of the Administrator or editor who blocked you, and the date, and it will be forwarded on to them. &lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you contact more than one person about this, please do them the courtesy of letting them know who else you have tried contacting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
::*This should be obvious from the header of my emails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Contacting an Administrator or editor can usually be done by one of the following methods: ''&lt;br /&gt;
*''Use the &amp;quot;Email this user&amp;quot; link in the toolbox. This, however, will only work if both you and the Administrator or editor have enabled this on your/their respective accounts.&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Administrator or editor may have provided an email address or other contact information (e.g. AIM) on their user page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*This section seems to be obsolete: ''email this user'' doesn't work for any of the administrators I tried to reach. And I couldn't get Ed Poor's email address via his user page. So we are in a [[Catch 22]] kind of situation...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I emailed to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;aschlafy@aol.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;conservapedia@zoho.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. I didn't get any reply (is 1-2 days a ''reasonable amount of time'' to wait? I thinks so...) to my short email which stated: ''I understand that my criticisms of CBP and the World History Lectures are quite unwelcome, but they are hardly trolling! I'd appreciate if you lift my block.''&lt;br /&gt;
::*So I decided to create a new account to appeal the block, hoping that the advice against this action is as obsolete as other sections of the ''editor's guide''.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 07:56, 26 October 2011 (EDT) (AugustO)&lt;br /&gt;
:::August, I think you should start a career in sales. You certainly have the persistence to be a good salesman. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:47, 26 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed Poor, the block of AugustO is now more than a week old. I tried to reach you via various channels - could you please lift the block as the stated reason (&amp;quot;trolling&amp;quot;) doesn't apply? [[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 11:09, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please get a [[writing plan]] from him and get it to me, and I'll consider it. Meanwhile, any sysop is free to unblock him. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:01, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Is that any official Sysop, or anyone with Block rights? I'd be happy to unblock Mr O so that he can post his writing plan.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:25, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::On second thoughts, perhaps I'll just go ahead. Please reverse my action if I'm overstepping the mark.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:33, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thanks for the unblock!&lt;br /&gt;
*I read the article on the [[writing plan]], and I'll try to provide you with one. This would be easier if a ''sample plan'' were provided. But nonetheless, here it is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mainly I'm interested in the CBP. Mind you, I'm not ''Junker Jörg'', I'm not capable to create a translation on my own which stands for hundreds of years. But I think that translating the Bible in a group, and extensively discussing your work is a marvelous way to get a greater insight into the ''Book of books''.  While doing so, I try to dig into what Conservative calls the ''ANE culture'', as you can see [[Talk:John_1-7_(Translated)#Issue_with_translation_of_John_4:53|here]], where I try to shed light on timekeeping during the Roman empire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I came here, I thought that there would be a group of likewise interested individuals, but at the moment there seems to be only one other editor with similar interests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As my approach to the CBP generates quite a few edits on talk-pages, I balance these with edits to articles. These tend to by connected somehow with my namesakes (August of Saxony, Ernest August of Hanover), the history - or just happen on pages where I read something which puzzled me :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:21, 8 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion issue ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be a great idea to merge the articles. In fact, if you were interested in expanding the article, I might be interested in helping.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:28, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please help me organize this. We should give prominence to conservative views, but let's steer away from censoring liberal views. It would be nice if liberals could see '''why''' conservatives believe differently. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:43, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::OK!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:48, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged the articles and added a bit on abortion and political ideology. How is it?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:53, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks for the change but==&lt;br /&gt;
perhaps it should be bed bugs (plural), and now when i make an edit and it goes thru, if i try to make another one i get &amp;quot;Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it&amp;quot; but no one has. Going back to page and trying anew results in the same. 3.1: longetivity should be longevity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus is Lord, thanks[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 07:58, 5 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback here ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback [http://conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Panel_members.2C_please_give_your_feedback_below HERE]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your assistance would be much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:05, 16 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have explained my ideas in private email to you and Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:50, 11 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  a few messages to you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few messages to you here: http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Air_superiority [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:14, 26 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for picking up some of my &amp;quot;wiki litter&amp;quot; that I left behind (redirects to non-existent pages). I will try to be more diligent as far as not littering in the future. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:22, 11 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. And don't bother yourself: it's better for you to focus your time on building the wiki, while less talented contributors like myself do the routine housekeeping. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If I had your writing skill, I'd be making whole article like you do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:34, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A message to you from Cipe ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixing a MediaWiki message: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you perform the edit I described [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;oldid=992864#Edit_request here, on very bottom of the page]? I asked Aschlafly but he's probably busy now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 15:33, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know the basics of Wiki coding and not the advanced level coding. I would ask someone else. Try Ed Poor. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:32, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unfortunately, I cannot edit Ed's talk page. Could you suggest someone different? Or message him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The change is rather small and requires only copy-and-paste. More directly: you can copy contents of this: [[User:Cipe/MW_fix]] to: [[MediaWiki:Revision-info]]. Even if my suggestion is wrong, it can be reverted, so there is no danger. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 16:41, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, I did it. But where can I see the results? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:53, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you very much. You'll see it when checking older revision. Here is an example: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that MediaWiki has a different message when you're checking current revision. I'll prepare fix in a moment. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 17:55, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The message seems to have logged me out. I think it needs fixing. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:56, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I also got logged out, but only once. I can consistently see the new message now. Perhaps the software logs out when a edit to MediaWiki is made. Could you please copy [[User:Cipe/MW fix 2]] to [[MediaWiki:Revision-info-current]]? I promise it's the last change :) It is shown for a permalink to current revision. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:08, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't think that's it. I think you need to put the '''www.''' in front of '''www.conservapedia.com''' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It seems to work. I can see the messages: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546 for past revisions] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=992065 for current revision]. Thanks for changing. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:19, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you for unlocking your talk page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really appreciate being able to get in contact with you directly when the circumstances arise.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 18:39, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
Now he can try to justify what he said about the article. [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 14:29, 14 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== File:GoreFireBreathing.jpg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think it would be appropriate to use this image in the [[Current TV]] article? It's already in Gore's main article, so why not include it in the article about his obscure TV network on channel 9800 on my TV? --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:35, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== apology. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I just wanted to apologise for the comments I made related to you, they were impolite and unnecessary.  I don't have anything against you or anything, I just posted something that I thought was relevent without thinking how it would be taken by anyone other than myself, as it happened they were rude and quite personal.  I acknowledge that I behaved quite badly, and in future I will try to avoid giving you, or others, offense.  So..... virtual handshake?[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 06:18, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, don't be so dramatic. Just comment on the articles and issues of the day, and forget about personalities. That's how this project's supposed to run. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:33, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::lol. Nah it's difficult to tell over the internet how people are reacting, so for all I knew you could have been quite insulted or something, and I had to make sure that I was being very clear. Anyway, cool[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 01:03, 19 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not sure you get it: We don't want personal remarks on this wiki, clear or not. You need to be clear only about one thing: what you intend to write about an article topic. You must not comment on other users in any way. Is '''that''' clear? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== On Personal Attacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As someone who has been the subject of personal comments (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987753&amp;amp;oldid=987715], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987827&amp;amp;oldid=987777], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987956&amp;amp;oldid=987955], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=990739&amp;amp;oldid=990566]), I would like to share my opinion on Conservapedia's policy on personal attacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it is very appropriate to make '''relevant''' comments on editing and other wiki behavior to determine what the best practices are with regards to editing and other actions and, if necessary, to instruct users who may not know better about such practices.  For example, I have informed two administrators about redacting the automatically-generated deletion log entry to remove sensitive material.  I have also asked one administrator to include source information in that user's uploaded images, requests with which this user has complied.  Likewise, if someone has a habit of posting comments on talk pages without signing them, it is appropriate to inform them of how to sign posts.  Further, if someone is about to violate 90/10, a warning is definitely appropriate.  None of these have to do with the real-life '''personality''' that these editors, many of whom are brothers and sisters in Christ, have; these comments focus on on-wiki '''behavior'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, I think that if someone is going to make a statement regarding real-life facts or Conservapedia's commandments, policies, and best practices, it is appropriate to debate this statement '''without going into personality details'''.  Such debate may very well include Socratic or rhetorical questioning as a argumentative device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, Mr. Schlafly is the owner of the site, so he has the final say in this, but I'm sure he would agree with what I have written.  Although attacks on another editor's real-life personality should generally be removed, I do not see the need to remove good-faith debate and discussion over user '''behavior''' at Conservapedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for reading this.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 12:36, 21 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, thanks, Greg. If I err on the side of &amp;quot;absolutely nothing about the person&amp;quot; to an absurd point, please continue to help me out. I'm mainly opposed to comments like, &amp;quot;You're a jerk&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I don't have to follow the rules.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nothing wrong with '''friendly''' personal comments, like, &amp;quot;Thanks for pointing out that a rigid, absolutist enforcement of the rules may not be wise.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hey Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw your Arbcom case over at Wikipedia just today looking through for cases of bias there. :) Wikipedia's - nuts, huh? Lol. I ran into the Obama bias team over there in Scjessey, Wikidemon, and company, back in late 2009. It's become so hopelessly biased by now you've just got to laugh. They know they're keeping all controversy out of the Obama page and how biased they are, and don't care. Well, all my facts are at Conservapedia's services now. :) Anyway, just saying it's nice to see another ex-Wikipedian here I guess - hope we get some more! :) --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Jzyehoshua]] 01:15, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tehpwn3r==&lt;br /&gt;
'User names based on your real name or initials are '''preferred'''' does not state that you will be blocked. [[User:Conservative|Also]].--[[User:Wishnaka|Wishnaka]] 19:51, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inappropriate user name. It has been a general principle that one's user name be &amp;quot;based on one's real first name and last initial&amp;quot;, though there are a number of reasons why that is not always practical. The point is that we don't like the kind of foolish &amp;quot;handles&amp;quot; that are often used in various blogs and social web sites. If you run afoul of this by accident, you will be asked to create a new account, and doing so will not be considered sockpuppetry. Of course, some user names are essentially just vandalism, and are treated that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you don't object, I suggest shortening his block to maybe 3 days. His remark, while rude and impertinent, did have some substance, and a hard block doesn't serve to do anything but cause more unhappiness. Thanks for considering,&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 20:48, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you unblock him, you're responsible. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:54, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I recommend keeping the week. And don't &amp;gt; dont. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:01, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for pointing out the typo.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 23:35, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Michael Baumgartner==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
Please do a careful side-by-side comparison of [[Michael Baumgartner]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Baumgartner&amp;amp;oldid=509330054 the Wikipedia article]. I did a google search on &amp;quot;Michael Baumgartner&amp;quot; and came up with a number of sources including the Wikipedia article.  I took notes from all of the sources, and wrote a new article based on my notes.  I honestly believe that the article uses a different set of sources, covers ideas in a different order, and covers the topic differently than Wikipedia.  Please take another look, and if you agree, please restore [[Michael Baumgartner]]. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:05, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*I understand the workload you face. Could you please look at the article and reconsider? [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:51, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*:Already restored in good faith; I trust you, and I'm not going to compare it closely. I'll leave that to others. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:54, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My condolences ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the death of the Rev Dr Moon. [[User:JuanMotame|JuanMotame]] 18:54, 2 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome. I wonder if you could help me. I tried [[Special:MovePage/William. J. Fulbright]] but apparently I don't have permission. The page should be at [[J. William Fulbright]], the name of the founder of the Fulbright scholarship program.&lt;br /&gt;
:Done.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:26, 4 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sun Myung Moon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You changed the first sentence of the protected article on [[Sun Myung Moon]] from the present to the past tense. Could you take care of the rest of the article, too? Thanks. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:35, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Feel free to take care of that yourself. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I took care of it. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 13:21, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:32, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Requesting Assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Poor,  I'm relatively new here and don't completely know my way around.  Would you please look at my comment concerning [[Talk:American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel|American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel]].  If my view is in line with the site, I'm quite certain that a template or procedure is needed at this point.  If my views are not in line with the site, please feel free to remove that comment as you see fit.  You seem experienced here, so your guidance is requested.  --[[User:Nouniquenames|Nouniquenames]] 00:03, 21 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Psychological manipulation]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that you moved/redirected the above article to [[Essay: Psychological manipulation in the Bible]] on grounds &amp;quot;not a general article; case study uses a Bible story&amp;quot;. I've got somewhat confused about this step, because IMHO the article is general and only the case study section itself contains a &amp;quot;Bible story&amp;quot;. In fact the rest is a combination of various sources, some of them far from having anything to do w/ Bible at all. I was by far not completely done with that article and now I actually do not know how to continue working on it. It says now &amp;quot;This Is An Original Work. Contributors should add their signatures to the end section. If published, a notice will be posted and, if desired, contributors will be recognized.&amp;quot; but that was not my idea at all, I would be more than happy if anyone could help to extend that, in my opinion, general article. If I could suggest anything then I would like to suggest to move only the 'case study' section to the essay realms and keep the rest as general article with hyperlink to that essay in appropriate, perhaps 'See Also' section. I also deem as deficiency that article does not appear in the Psychology category now, I believe it belongs there.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:35, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Objections to evolution]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As for your rationale for redirect on 'Objections to evolution', namely &amp;quot;I thought we already had plenty of articles opposing the Theory of evolution&amp;quot;, I agree with you that &amp;quot;we have&amp;quot;, but still would dare to oppose the redirect on grounds that 'Objections to evolution' is an article that brainwashes people at WP and enjoys special defence by witch-hunters who heavily suppress any different points of view there thus I believe it is of significant importance to have available alternative view on the same topic under the very same title.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:50, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quote Templates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was doing some ''random page'' editing and found that there was a whole load of quote templates you created a while ago that link to nowhere and nothing seems to link to them. It seems the template for linking these quotes never got off the ground. I'm proposing that these either be deleted or put into some sort of quote page as I don't think there much use at the moment (except for possibly taking up server space). Kind Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 02:00, 2 November 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Unificationism]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I am not surprised to see you make changes to the Unificationism page in defense of  your church, but why did you remove the part in which Moon  told an interviewer,  &amp;quot;God is living in me and I am the incarnation of himself.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The whole world is in my hand and I will conquer and subjugate the world.&amp;quot;   [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19459920?print=true]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you saying the BBC made that up?  [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 08:23, 14 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can put that back in. Sorry for the delayed answer; my day job keeps me pretty busy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Be advised, though, that Rev. Moon himself disputed the ''conquer and subjugate'' quote, telling Newsweek interviewers that he had been quoted out of context. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, 20 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Way to stop the spammers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Aschlafly's talk page &lt;br /&gt;
Yesterday after I prayed an idea came to me (most likely from god) to stop the spammers from registering the spam accounts. If we can move away from user captcha and instead use a question that requires some knowledge (for example what team does tim tebow sit on the bench for or which team did he turned around) as the spambots will be completely flummoxed by this. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:16, 19 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The questycaptcha is excellent for this purpose. It stops ocr bots, and most paid spammers. The code would be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   require_once( &amp;quot;$IP/extensions/ConfirmEdit/ConfirmEdit.php&amp;quot; );&lt;br /&gt;
   $wgCaptchaClass = 'QuestyCaptcha';&lt;br /&gt;
   $arr = array (&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;A question?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;An answer!&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;What is this wiki's name?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Conservapedia&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        'Who is Tim Tebow' =&amp;gt; 'An athlete',&lt;br /&gt;
   foreach ( $arr as $key =&amp;gt; $value ) {&lt;br /&gt;
        $wgCaptchaQuestions[] = array( 'question' =&amp;gt; $key, 'answer' =&amp;gt; $value );&lt;br /&gt;
   }&lt;br /&gt;
Which you would place in /rootfiledirectory/localsettings.php[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:54, 19 November 2012 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Given your considerable experience in operating and maintaining wiki's like Wikipedia and convservapedia, do you think you would be able to implement this ? Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 05:12, 23 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A serious Biblical matter==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aschlafly wrote the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. This wouldn't have been to problematic, but now he puts his outlandish idea into an article in the main space ([[Epistle to the Hebrews]]). First he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''the most plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it.'''&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Iduan]] toned this down somewhat, so that we read at the moment:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''one plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it'''.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I couldn't find any Biblical scholar who shares this idea, I couldn't find any authorative figure who promotes this - and this isn't much of a surprise if you read the epistle for yourself!  The only &amp;quot;scholar&amp;quot; who has proposed this &amp;quot;theory&amp;quot; in the last 2000 years is Andrew Schlafly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to delete this sentence, and then I tried to make it clear that this idea is a personal insight by Andrew Schlafly. My edits were reverted:  any reader of this encyclopedia gets the impression that this theory is something commonly known or well discussed. That's utterly untrue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tend to be quite strict on Biblical matters - I'm often accused of being nitpicky.  As one of the sysops of Conservapedia who was active in 2012 I ask you to weigh in on this problem: maybe it is just me and most of the of you and your fellow sysops think that it is acceptable to present an  insight of a single person '''in a Biblical matter''' (an insight shared by virtually no one)  as a plausible theory. But - as the title of this section indicates - for me this is a very serious matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:26, 25 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree. Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, 5 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? &amp;quot;'' As I tried to convey with the phrase &amp;quot;this wouldn't have been to problematic&amp;quot;, there is nothing wrong with the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. But I think it ''is'' problematic that the ''insight'' of the essay spills over into a page in the main space, i.e., [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], and becomes a ''fact'' during this process.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree.&amp;quot;'' It's the other way round: stating the ''insight'' in an article in the main space without making it clear that the only source for this idea is Andrew Schlafly is lending it an improper credibility. If you read an unsourced, unmarked statement in an encyclopedia, the reader generally takes it as a kind of common knowledge, even more so if he is e.g., a high-school pupil.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:28, 6 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a mix of opinion and fact. Each is clearly marked. Talk pages are filled with unsourced claims, and we make very few efforts to police such talk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is currently an unsourced, unmarked statement in an article that needs attention, please point it out to me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you - if unsourced, unmarked statements are reintroduced into the article, I'll point them out to you! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:02, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im new here and need some help. I figured I would go to you since you seem very involved in the community. I recently tried to instate an article about R*tional Wiki and suddenly it was deleted. I thought since we had an article about Wikipedia that we could write about wikis. I also noticed that it had been deleted several times by the same people. Why? The words are spam filtered to. I feel that we need to write about the faults and propaganda of this completely biased website. Not to mention they completely badmouth you in the most rude ways. Please help...--[[User:Colesmithsayshi|Colesmithsayshi]] 14:18, 31 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mass Wedding ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was wanting to know what is the significance of mass weddings in the unification church ? I see your church has recently conducted it's first mass wedding since the very untimely death of the great Sun Myung Moo. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:05, 17 February 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not sure how to respond to messages. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not sure how to answer the message you sent me.  There does not seem to be a way to respond attached to the message you sent.  Do I just respond in this open forum?  Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Math ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings, Ed.  We haven't communicated in quite a while.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason I am writing is that I saw your recent [[Essay:Campaign_to_make_Conservapedia_unusable]].  I know that this has long been an issue, and that you and I have both put a lot of effort into making math/science articles accessible.  I have one comment about it:  ''Your audience for this essay is just yourself.''  All the people who made things inaccessible&amp;amp;mdash;Foxtrot, Lemonpeel, Jaques, etc, are long gone.  So, if you want the situation to improve, instead of writing an essay, you're just going to have to make the improvements yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I'm not sure what articles you have in mind for your criticism.  If it's all the topology stuff ([[Regular_space]], [[Sequentially_compact]], [[Hausdorff_space]], ...), you have my sympathy, and you will just have to delete them.  No one will improve them.  But I strongly advise you ''not'' to delete them.  They aren't doing any harm, and no one reads them (except me :-).  An encyclopedia is not judged by how esoteric its most esoteric articles are, but by how well its mainstream articles are written, and how well those mainstream articles cover the field.  I think the mainstream math articles at Conservapedia, like integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers, are pretty good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which brings me to my specific point.  It isn't true that no one edits math articles any more.  There was a small amount of activity on integers and natural numbers recently.  Perhaps this is what led you to write the essay.  I don't think there was anything over-the-top about the recent edits, and I think you sometimes over-react to things like this.  I believe that the recent edits in that area were well-intentioned, and trying to do a good job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving a really good definition of the integers or natural numbers, in the way that you and I would like, at the appropriate level but with real clarity, is ''impossible''.  Saying &amp;quot;evenly divisible by 1&amp;quot; doesn't work, because the reader who doesn't know what an integer is will have no conception of what division is or what &amp;quot;evenly divisible&amp;quot; means.  Saying &amp;quot;has no fractional part&amp;quot; doesn't work either.  I can see what the author intended--numbers are things like &amp;quot;3.7&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;.7&amp;quot; is the fractional part.  So, having no fractional part means it is something like just 3.  That's correct, but it relies on having an intuitive notion of real numbers, that is, things like 3 and 3.1 and 3.7 and 3.14159....  (Speaking of which, happy pi day!!!)  Now most people have an intuitive feel for numbers with fractions well before they have to think about a formal definition of natural numbers.  I know I did.  That is, I knew about &amp;quot;3&amp;quot; in the context of &amp;quot;3.7 without the .7&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;the biggest markings on a ruler, rather than all the small ones.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how do you write the article?  You do the best you can, giving an imprecise defintion in terms of &amp;quot;numbers that you count with&amp;quot;, or something like that.  (By the way, I really really liked your &amp;quot;mathisfun&amp;quot; web link explaining these things on an elementary level, and I used it (crediting you) in my article at Ameriwiki.)  So the right thing is probably to define &amp;quot;counting numbers&amp;quot;, as in the web link, and accepting that that's the best you can do.  Then address, very lightly, the issue of how that might be different from &amp;quot;natural numbers&amp;quot;, and whether zero is included, and so on.  It's not worth making a big deal about.  Just pick some definitions, and stick to them.  Mention that maybe not everyone agrees.  Don't worry about students getting a bad grade on an exam because of a nit-picking difference--people taking exams will presumably have attended a class and gotten the instructor's view on this, if the instructor thinks it's important.  The way you addressed the issue in the natural number article is just right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, the stuff about integers being &amp;quot;the only integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered and in which order is preserved by addition&amp;quot; is over the top.  Either take it out or move it to the very bottom.  Other than that, I think the natural number / integer articles are in pretty good shape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more thing:  Don't be put off by the fancy &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; symbol.  The people are not trying to show off.  The symbols are cool, and the students will think so.  When I was in junior high, I thought that the summation and integral symbols were really cool, long before I knew what they meant.  Let the students see them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I still say that the Peano axioms would be a good thing to have at Conservapedia.  Nowhere near as complicated as &amp;quot;integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered&amp;quot;, and really interesting for the target audience.  You may copy my Peano article from Ameriwiki if you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:34, 14 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just wanted to add my thoughts as a math graduate student who has made several edits to our math articles.  As someone who plans on becoming a professor, I think it is fundamental that, as an educational resource, Conservapedia has accessible (to the extent possible) math material.  However, we are not limited in space like a print encyclopedia, so there is certainly room for us to have more in-depth coverage of math topics for more advanced scholars.  It's not my intention to make Conservapedia unusable as an educational resource; if you think that my edits are not helpful, please feel free to discuss them with me.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:20, 15 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You may have missed my point, which is that 99% of our readers are concerned with math that is below the college level. I want the majority of our editorial effort in math to focus on what these readers need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 17 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed:  I take exception to your implication that I &amp;quot;missed your point&amp;quot; about the intended audience of CP, or how to write for it.  Be assured that I absolutely, totally, utterly, and completely understand these issues.  If you have any question about this, please see my articles on [[Limit (mathematics)]], [[Algebra]], [[Compass and straightedge]], and [[Cramer's rule]].  ''These are all topics that I studied in high school'', and I'm sure you did too.  In particular, I put an enormous amount of work into the limit article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, this stuff is entirely in your hands now.  If you have any problems with the math articles, you have the administrative power to delete any articles that you think are inappropriate, like the [[Kolmogorov space]] article.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:57, 4 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, thanks, brother wolf, for exposing your neck so meekly. But I have no desire to be top dog, if you'll excuse me for mixing metaphors. I'm glad you understand and work hard, and I hope you will help me make high school math (and below) accessible to the average reader - not just those in the top 1% like you and me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:47, 5 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must confess that I don't understand your metaphors very much -- brother wolf? exposing my neck?  I'm pretty clueless about contemporary culture.  But I know what &amp;quot;top dog&amp;quot; means.  There's no doubt that you are a top dog, being an administrator.  Also, I'm flattered to be considered in the top 1%, but, remember, there have been a lot of really sharp people here.  So I'm not sure about being in the top 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, good luck, and have fun.  And don't hesitate to delete stuff that you consider inappropriate.  Really.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll come by and look around and say hello from time to time.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:50, 11 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carbon Dioxide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have redone Brenden's edits in a number of different edits. I hope this helps you. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 07:01, 10 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It did. See my subsequent edits. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:23, 12 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Understanding Islam ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for this entry: [[Islam and tolerance]]. I followed the reference link to the news story &amp;quot;The Roots of Muslim rage&amp;quot;, and read the article. I thought it was really interesting, and as I am trying to better understand their beliefs and attitude towards us, (those of Christian faith and in Western Nations) I wanted you to know this was helpful to me, thanks. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:36, 15 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I put the article up for deletion; please contest me on it's talk page. Thanks, [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:29, 5 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I remember posting this thank-you to Ed Poor almost 3 months ago for making the page, as he referenced a very interesting article in the footnotes that helped me to better understand the position of Muslims. I had been trying to gain a better understanding of their point of view, and I found it very helpful. I'm surprised to see it up for deletion, since I don't think &amp;quot;one quote&amp;quot; pages are undesirable, as they often lead me to think more about a subject matter. Sometimes a little quote can lead to learning more about a subject. Why not add a little more information rather than try to delete the page? [[User:Taj|Taj]] 14:32, 6 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of your newer articles need some categories. I don't really know much about subject matter so would probably be better if you do it. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:03, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Feel free to place any category at all, when I'm too rushed to do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:18, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Normally I would, just not to familiar with some of subject matter. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:22, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Christian Chivalry==&lt;br /&gt;
I redirected your article on [[Christian chivalry]] to the already existing page [[Chivalry]] since they're the same concept and the other page was already much more in-depth. Hope that was alright. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:20, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did you complete the merge before reducing the page to a redirect? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:16, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not an admin, I don't think I can do a full merge like that... I figured since it was just a sentence and the sentiment of that sentence was already covered in the other article that the redirect would be sufficient... sorry. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 22:26, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you did your best in good faith, then no apology is needed. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll take a look later on, and if I think that quote is relevant I'll tack it on to [[Chivalry]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:28, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Talk:Gun control#New Infographic]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As you are one of the main contributors to the [[Gun control]] page, I'm writing here to ask you to follow the link I posted in the heading of this section and read the data I found. I think it could be very helpful to the article, but as I said there I'm far from an expert in interpreting that kind of data. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm interested in describing both sides in the [[Firearms debate]]. I don't think we have to overemphasize one side. Put in anything you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==fnarrow's reply to your terms==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just copy and pasting what he sent me, please don't shoot the messenger. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]], I agree to your terms unequivocally and will do everything I can on the future to not allow my emotions to get the better of me in the future. That said, I just want to take a second to point out that 2 of the 6 examples you gave of my behavior, (4 and 5 I believe, i do not have the other page open as I type this email) were not posted by me but were part of a comment posted by another user in response to my comments. The other 4 I do not deny and I agree that they were out of line. To that end, I would like to point out that if you or [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] look at the final interaction between myself and [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] in the &amp;quot;why complaints will go nowhere&amp;quot; section of that same page, you will see that we had settled our differences peacefully. It wasn't until after that that i was banned for earlier statements made in the heat of the moment and out of exasperation regarding the situation at the time they were made. I do not contest the justice of the 1 day block, but when it was immediately followed by the infinite block before I had a chance to respond, apologize or anything else, that was when I felt I had been treated unfairly and asked my friend to join the site as a conduit for contact. (thanks again John!) While I therefore still think the infinite block was unwarranted, i do apologize for my actions and will not allow it to happen again. Thanks for your time and i look forward to helping the site grow from this point forward. --fnarrow&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; btw, I'm not 100# sure what a &amp;quot;sock&amp;quot; is, assure you that to my understanding of the term I am not one. I have neither the time nor the inclination to edit your wiki and only made this account at my friend's request since he had no other contact anyone here. [[User:JSandler|JSandler]] 22:35, 28 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Karajou said I could unblock Fnarrow. I hope this turns out okay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:29, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fnarrow ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you be able to restore Fnarrows user and talk page whilst your at it mate ? [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:30, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:(this is [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]], I'm using [[User:JSandler|John(jsandler)'s]] phone at the moment as my IP is still blocked even though my user page shows that I have been unblocked by [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]]... Can that be fixed?) I wanted to thank everyone for helping me understand what happened and helping me get reinstated. I look forward to working with you all more in the future. Also, as [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] already posted, is it possible to have my user page and talk page content restored? Most of it can be deleted now that issues have been settled, but I'd like to recover other parts. Thanks again, [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]] 14:00, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ed, yes I can post again, I had assumed you had unblocked me... but I guess not based upon your comment on my talk page. Anyway, can you restore the content which was deleted from my user page and talk page? I don't know how to do that... Also, since you're a very knowledgeable Conservative and I consider myself to be a fairly knowledgeable Libertarian I'd be willing to work with you on the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page you created if you're still looking for someone to help with that project. Let me know. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 00:12, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked your username. Someone else seems to have unblocked your IP address; I don't know how to do that.&lt;br /&gt;
I'll leave your user and talk pages as C left them - ask him if he wants them undeleted. I'm just unblocking you, in light of your promise to chill out and be more focused on articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please start the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page, and I'll join in. Thanks! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:41, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we can do that although I am not good with wikis. From what i Understand, Libertarians are conservative when it comes to economics, gun ownership, small government, defence etc but are closer to liberals on other social issues. The way I understand it, libertarians believe the law should protect person and property, but go no further than that. I will do some research in the next few days, write a beta copy and forward to you for review/editing if thats ok&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Excellent, Patmac. I'll add that to the article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:22, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Homosexuality article and General protection idea/proposal  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[homosexuality]] article seems to be a bit broken. The table of contents is in the wrong position. Could you or another sysop please fix this ? Also I had an Idea re article protection. Would it be possible to protect some article so that only those users with '''edit''' and '''sysop''' rights edit them. This would allow those pages to be edited and improved by trusted and known users whilst stopping liberal trolls and thugs pushing their POV and vandalizing them. I think that something like this would help improve the quality and accuracy of the encyclopedia as it would allow for updates, improvements, tweaks and general formatting improvements to be made to our most popular articles [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:45, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For questions about rights (which involve software tweaks), talk to Andy. I can always unprotect an article at least temporarily. But if you want a longterm solution, I'm the wrong man to ask. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Odysseus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You should highlight quotes by including them in apostrophes: see [[Help:How to Code]] for a simple introduction - and follow [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052312&amp;amp;oldid=1052300 this link] for an example.&lt;br /&gt;
*If you include a link to a source just by using simple square brackets (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/odysseus.htm]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), it appears only as a number (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) in the text, similar to footnotes. But unlike those, it isn't listed in the references. To get it listed there, you have to include your link into &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; - tags. (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052314&amp;amp;oldid=1052313 this link] for an example)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 04:31, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps either AugustO or Ed Poor can help me, but other than on recent wikis where the quotation mark and the italic notation can be easily confused, I have never seen italic font used as a stand-alone indication of a block quotation.  I have seen italic used for titles of books or for emphasis or for foreign language words, but not as a replacement for quotation marks.  Any sources for this alternative would be appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 10:56, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:A very good question! Conservapedia states in its [[Conservapedia:Formatting conventions]]:&lt;br /&gt;
::''Italic sections of text are usually used to portion off a portion of text, indicating it is integral to the sentence without being part of its continuation. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:But while wikipedia don't like when you put quotes in italics &lt;br /&gt;
::''For quotations, use only quotation marks (for short quotations) or block quoting (for long ones), not italics. (See Quotations below.) This means that (1) a quotation is not italicized inside quotation marks or a block quote just because it is a quotation, and (2) italics are no substitute for proper quotation formatting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia doesn't address the matters (as far as I could see). Instead, Conservapedia offer some templates which try to do the job.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote}} or {{Q}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This template expects an author, so it can't be used in our special case:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Note how the text gets italicized, and is included in quotation marks: but this template is only used eleven times on this wiki. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote box}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quote box|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox2}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox2|quote=the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|source=John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:''QuoteBox2'' is used ten times on Conservapedia, ''Quotebox'' 422 times, ''Quote box'' only 1 time. Clearly they aren't very popular.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the most popular version, used over 1500 times. &lt;br /&gt;
:My conclusion: &lt;br /&gt;
:#The main feature of a quotation are - surprise, surprise - the quotation marks. Especially for short quotes, they shouldn't be omitted. I haven't used them regularly in the past (see the first quotations in this section), but I'll do so henceforth.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Conservapedia is mute on the use of italics to mark a quote. But perhaps we should follow wikipedia's lead and just don't do so&lt;br /&gt;
:#Indenting via ::: alone is not enough to mark a section as a long quote, at least &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; .. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; should be used - this indents the quote from the left and the right margin. A longer quotation should use one of the templates - best probably &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:Any thoughts? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:50, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My thought is that the last time we discussed a formatting issue, I tried to throw my weight around, and it didn't end on a cheerful note. So why don't I just follow whatever you recommend? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:24, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you.  I just want to say that I have never, ever thought of italics as conveying the limits of a quotation.  I always assumed that someone had put a printout of wiki-marked up text into an OCR scanner and it just got confused between double apostrophes and a quote mark.  I agree with your bottom line. Thanks [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 21:40, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neutral third party's viewpoint sought ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed.  I'd like to get your views on the discussion between another user and me that took place on my talk page.  It looks as if you recently blocked him over another matter.  I think he just tried to bully me for no good reason, but I'd like to hear what a senior admin thinks.  Thanks for weighing in if you get the chance.  [[User:DanAP|DanAP]] 00:14, 18 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I believe RontheDon and Bamorris9 are parodists--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 11:52, 20 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Propositional calculus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started that article.  It's a topic that you have, on several occasions (remember the &amp;quot;wff N proof&amp;quot; game?) expressed an interest in.  I urge you to fill it out.  Though I have a degree in mathematics, I do not know how to explain this topic at a high-school level, and I do not write about topics that I can't explain at a high-school level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also notice no activity on any &amp;quot;sciency&amp;quot; (STEM?) stuff over the last few months, from you or anyone else.  Have you lost interest?  I hope not.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 21:00, 1 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Susan Rice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please help me to expand the article [[Susan E. Rice]]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:29, 6 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I dont know how to put in a Officeholder-template. Can you please do it. Here are all informations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rice --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:32, 11 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edward Snowden ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should read [[Edward Snowden]]. That was my mistake. I might even have heard someone else mispronounce that.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:04, 12 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lukashenko ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please uploud this picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpeg ? Thanks--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 09:18, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For the [[Belarus]] article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No for the [[Alexander Lukashenko]]-article please.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:50, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess you mean [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_%28%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0%29.jpeg this picture.] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:yes and please uploud a picture of [[Nicolas Maduro]]. Like [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Canciller_de_Venezuela_y_Ofrenda_Floral_a_Bol%C3%ADvar_%284%29.jpg this] here--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:25, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:55, 3 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==RE:Categories==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're welcome! - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 12:09, 17 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flags and Coat of Arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud the flags and the coat of arms of the following countries: [[Guinea-Bissau]], [[Republic of China]], [[Benin]], [[Saint Lucia]], [[Saint Vincent and the Grenadines]], [[Ireland]] and [[Fiji]]. I already asked Karajou but he did´nt answered.--07:59, 21 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please uploud them.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:42, 28 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== quick reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a quick reminder. Please put category tags on your new articles. I would also try to have internal links to them from related articles (within articles or the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:04, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Your [[John Mighton]] and [[Learning styles]] articles need category tags and so do some of your most recent articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:11, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I will try to help out and add categories to a few pages in case Dr. Poor is too busy to do this immediately; he can always change the categories if he feels they don't fit. Thanks! [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:35, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservative, you are correct; thanks, Taj, for quickly filling the gap! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:19, 5 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read your article [[Ten year rule]] and it served as further impetus for me to see if this rule of thumb could be shortened via various techniques such as more rapid skill acquisition, improved memorization skills (mnemonics), increasing reading comprehension, time management skills, etc.  I found some additional interesting material on this matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as skill acquisition, a Christian I know came to the United States from Africa and became fluent in English though total immersion in English. He refused to speak his native tongue with his fellow countryman on campus. It worked. He obtained college level English skills within 3 months. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:17, 31 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Completing the square==&lt;br /&gt;
You might want to take a look at that article, and weigh in on whether it is &amp;quot;jargon&amp;quot; or otherwise pitched at an inappropriate level.  Perhaps I should have checked with you ''before'' going off the deep end.  I know that you share my interest in making the math articles accessible to the expected audience.  I believe that the topic of solving quadratic equations, and the quadratic formula, and the derivation of same by &amp;quot;completing the square&amp;quot;, are completely appropriate.  I also believe that the article covers this topic in a completely straightforward way.  (If they had used Hilbert spaces to prove the quadratic formula, that would have been a different matter!)  Anyway, feel free to put the jargon tag back if you think it should be there.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:20, 8 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't have to check with me before writing anything, and thanks for telling me about changes to [[Completing the square]]. I'm always interested in the reading level of articles, as well as any prerequisites a reader must have. The main point is not to be able to say, &amp;quot;All the information is complete and correct.&amp;quot; Rather, it is for the readers to leave here having learned or understood something which is important to them. In other words, it's not about us (&amp;quot;getting graded&amp;quot;) but about them (&amp;quot;getting edified&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:32, 9 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:See &lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic equations]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic formula]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[completing the square]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Hilbert spaces]] - way beyond [[high school math]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Jargon]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Accessibility of math articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikimedia Commons==&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud these images:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/78/Machno.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Rosa_Luxemburg.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Nicolas_Maduro_Moros.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:12, 16 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you please uploud these images also:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/Hassan_Rouhani_2.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:03, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You forgot this one: [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:12, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can you find one with an English title, instead of Russian letters? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:40, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure: [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:28, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:24, 22 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Here are the links again: '''[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG] [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]''' --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 12:15, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=upload&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1 upload log] and tell me which ones you still need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The links that I have posted over you.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:07, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Black man from Brooklyn.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not recall Conservapedia putting the race of the Sandy Hook, Aurora, or Sikh temple shooters on the front page of the website. Why do so this time? [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 12:06, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you think it's not relevant? There's been a lot of [[black on white]] crime lately. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think his blackness is as relevant as the whiteness of the majority of the spree killers in this country. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 22:15, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just went into one of your recent two sentence articles and it didn't have periods after the sentences. If you don't want to put in the effort to write an informative article and can't be bothered to even put periods after your sentences, then please consider not creating any more articles.  Andy just deleted one of our articles that was merely a quote. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe you are capable of writing good articles, but you are choosing to just slap &amp;quot;articles&amp;quot; together instead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are putting category tags on them now so you are taking some additional effort. But you need to put more effort in them if you are going to create them. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:50, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, how about [[Momentum]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:32, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== My response ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for my ill-tempered tone earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, this is what I would suggest and I will explain why below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Use this free tool to make it easy to create 400+ word articles: http://www.wordcounttool.com/ Your article was about 150 words long. This website is competing against other articles for people's attention and so keeping this standard will help this website better compete. Also, if you look at the search engine results, you will generally see the search results are at least 400 words long in length.  For example, see the search results for the word momentum here: [https://www.google.com/search?q=momentum&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high Search results for the word momentum]  and [http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=momentum&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;fr=moz35 More search results for the word momentum]. The articles are significantly over 150 words long. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People want longer articles that are at least 400 words. The search engines know this. That is why these type of articles are in the search engine results. So instead of creating three 150 word articles, write one article that is about 400 words or more. If a wiki has more search engine results, more traffic will be generated. If more traffic is generated, then more people will tend to sign up as editors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try to write articles that show up first in the search engines. Endeavor to do your best when writing an article. The Apostle Paul said, &amp;quot;Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but {only} one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.&amp;quot; (1 Corinthians 9:24).   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. If you use a quote, always cite it as students want a resource they can readily use and their teachers expect them to cite their sources for quotes. Here is a good format to use as it clearly shows the quotations around the quote plus cites the source of the quote: http://www.conservapedia.com/Socialism#Obama_administration_and_land_ownership&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for not responding in anger to my talk page post. I was planning to erase it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:34, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, put an attractive picture on your articles if possible. [[Flipperpithecus|This article]] ranks #1 at a popular search engine for a term as can be seen [https://www.google.com/search?q=flipperpithecus&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high HERE].  It features an attractive picture. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:11, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please review this block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been meaning to write to you about the block of EddyJ, but, first, something else has come up.  I believe that the recent block of DanAP is completely wrong.  He wrote a note [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Depression&amp;amp;diff=1068305&amp;amp;oldid=1068242 here], praising your work over the last six years, and was blocked for it.  I believe his note was sincere (and I happen to agree with it, by the way.)  Please do something about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the main issue is EddyJ.  He has been infinitely blocked, with the note &amp;quot;Ask Ed Poor before reinstating this person.&amp;quot;  I'm baffled by that note.  As you may know, I do extensive research of the people at Conservapedia; their interests; their viewpoints; their editing styles; and what kinds of fights they get into.  He has had some interactions with you, but nothing that would suggest that you have some special interest in his block.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He seems to be something of a hard-luck person in terms of being blocked.  He got blocked by you, by accident, which you retracted and apologized for 2 minutes later.  He got blocked 4 times by Markman, who was a vile character.  (I exchanged some email with Markman after his banishment from CP and RW; he's even more vile than you may realize.)  These blocks were clearly just Markman being destructive, and one was overturned by Andy.  Anyway, his relationship with you seems to be &amp;quot;interesting&amp;quot; but respectful.  (Rather like my relationship with you, or with Daniel Pulido&amp;amp;mdash;a very interesting person.)  His only fight with you was over the &amp;quot;Black man&amp;quot; issue, which I don't consider to have been very serious as fights go.  So please review his case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:06, 16 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Have him submit a [[writing plan]], and I'll discuss the matter with Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:36, 18 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me to expand the article [[Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst]] and dont forget the photos.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 14:07, 20 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== speedy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please look at the [[:Category:Speedy deletion candidates]] and delete some articles there.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 03:26, 16 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beethoven==&lt;br /&gt;
One finds wonderful things in unexpected places.  I happened to see your edit to the Beethoven article, with the reference to the BBC video series.  I've downloaded it.  3 parts.  It's wonderful!  You might also want to look at a similar 3-part series, also by Charles Hazelwood, about Mozart.  Both series are in three parts.  Go to the first one in each case, and you will see links to the other two.  I'd suggest putting all 3 links in the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections of the Beethoven and Mozart pages.  The first Mozart article is at [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrXpzOFknN0]; the other two are linked from there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, I'm not a great fan of putting in seemingly disconnected quotes, and I know other people have criticized you for the same thing.  I'd suggest saying something as a subsection of the line for the 9th, like &amp;quot;One commentator has said the Beethoven's ninth symphony &amp;quot;remains as potent, obsessive, and bewilderingly brilliant as ever&amp;quot;, giving the BBC link.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:21, 29 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5 maintenance tasks that need to be done - some of which could be automated - perhaps you could help as far as the automation of the tasks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some editors like to do wiki maintenance tasks. I started on two of these maintenance task, but I don't have the time to do it all myself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 maintenance task that need to be done: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1.''' De-orphan pages which have no category tags or links to them from other pages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2.''' Remove about 8% of the wiki pages which are ex-editors' user pages and user talk pages who have not edited in the last 3 years.''' And this task could probably be automated, but it could be done manually too.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a list of editors/users here: http://conservapedia.com/Special:ListUsers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you go through the list and put delete page tags on the user pages and user talk pages of users who have been inactive for 3 years, then those pages can be deleted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can also find the pages that need to be deleted by looking at the pages that have these templates on them and then see if the users have been active in the last 3 years: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AUseful+links and http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AWelcome  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3.''' Delete the templates that are never being used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4.''' Build up the 2 sentence stub articles so they have at least 500 words.  Using the random page search function, I estimate the stub articles are at least 30-40% of the wiki articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5.''' Within 10 years, about 50% of links become broken links. Xenu's Link Sleuth can crawl your website and find these dead links plus make a report: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, using this Firefox tool https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/linkchecker/ or this chrome tool https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/link-checker/aibjbgmpmnidnmagaefhmcjhadpffaoi?hl=en these dead links can be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did this link maintenance already for the atheism, evolution and homosexuality articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think these 5 maintenance tasks being done would enhance the user experience for the readers plus these are maintenance tasks that need to be done. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:37, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Automating some of these tasks ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mentioned Xenu's Link Sleuth above in order to help automate spotting the dead links. I think that deleting the the inactive editors who have not edited for 3 years could be automated as well. Maybe using something like [[User:EdBot]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:36, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I was teach math and English   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Master Yoda, welcome back you are! ;-) --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:18, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Call myself senior, I would not! :-) [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:53, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Great to see you again here, Ed!  I look forward to learning more from your edits.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:12, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Can you Help? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed. It's good to see you back. I have been wanting to join the [[Creationwiki]] and [[Citizendium]] encyclopedia projects. I recognized your name on both sites. Last year I asked on your talk page but you were away at the time. Now that you are back, can you tell me how can I get an account for [[Citizendium]]? There is a [[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:RequestAccount| forum for registering]] but they are testing it, and I do not want to give away my info without receiving my account. So, how can I request an account where I will be assured of receiving it? And, how do I get a [[Creationwiki]] account? I requested once, but I got no confirmation email either in my inbox or spam folder. It appears that Hotmail has problems. I don't think I will be requesting either at present, but when I am ready, how can I request without having to wait? [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I would like to tell you that I will still edit Conservapedia even after I join the above sites. I just will edit them in addition. I originally edited [[Wikipedia]], but I have left because I could not agree with the viewpoints there. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, I don't know anything about that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:10, 16 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== small request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, could you please put category tags on your new articles. For example, this article [[Rudd Weatherwax]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:26, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Category tags, got it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::re Category:Animal trainers, Category:Dog trainers, Category:American male film actors: [[Conservapedia:Editing_article_and_talk_pages#Categories|Unlike articles, categories are to be in title case (e.g. Australian Cities and Towns, not Australian cities and towns), and are to be plural where applicable.]] --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The recursion joke ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was used in Donald Knuth's ''The Art of Computer Programming'' in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And hello again!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to keep the math and science stuff from going off the deep end over the last couple of years.  Not really hard; you and I seem to have scared off the flamers pretty well.  But something came up very recently, that you might want to look at.  See the quadrupole stuff in [[Gravitational waves]].  It's beyond me, and I'm way too busy fighting lower-level battles at present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:24, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, Sam, I'm going to stick to the K-12 curriculum. That's what I know best. But it's great to be back! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Internet Explorer]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed. Years ago you had the article on [[Internet Explorer]] removed due to its poor sourcing, or, I am not sure what, but it is still on the talkpage. I have recreated the article with a screenshot at the side. I have posted this message to ask if you would like to help in developing the article. I am not very good at finding sources or researching, although I do what I can. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 23:01, 24 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet_Explorer&amp;amp;direction=prev&amp;amp;oldid=903283 this version] doesn't seem so bad - after 4 or 5 years. Do as you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:58, 28 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you. I have restored to that version, but retained the screenshot and the category of Internet. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 19:44, 29 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bots==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello!  As I mentioned on [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Bots_.28and_other_web_services_and_resources.29|Mr. Schlafly's talk page]], I was wondering about the possibility of trying to help CP by running a bot.  I have a limited understanding of PHP and this kind of bot, but am fairly tech savvy and have created and used other sorts of bots on occasion.  [[User:JDano|JDano]] mentioned that you are the only person of CP who has successfully set up a bot, so I just thought I would ask you what you think.  It seems to me this would be a nice thing to do, but I'm not exactly sure how to proceed.  I'm also unsure of whether Mr. Schlafly would approve of me trying this, and whether it would even work, or if this wouldn't work with the permissions level I have here.  I have a stable web server and a slightly less stable private server.  Any thoughts?  Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 15:23, 12 April 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you haven't disappeared, I might point out that my bot only worked with a previous version of MediaWiki. Let me know if you're still interested. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:44, 19 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm still here, and thanks for getting back to me!  I am also still interested, though I'm uncertain if:&lt;br /&gt;
#I am able to do this&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If I'm allowed to run a bot, since I'm not an admin&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If bots are even allowed on CP--someone thought they were altogether disallowed.&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If there is a sufficient need to a for for me to bother (and also bother others, like you)&lt;br /&gt;
::That is annoying that your bot isn't compatible with the update, but is there a way to take your basic code and put it into a new &amp;quot;adaption&amp;quot; framework?  As far as my own attempt, I'm finding a number of off-the-shelf &amp;quot;bots&amp;quot; which are freely available, but pre-configured for Wikipedia.  I don't know if they could be used or not, but it might be an option. Do you have any other thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 00:16, 20 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since my last post, I have gotten a few answers to my questions.  I also now have a working [[User:DavidB4-bot|batch edit bot]].  It has a lot of limitations and a few bugs, but it's a start.  I would like it if one of use could get a sort of vandalism reduction/reversion bot working, as you previously had.  I in no way want to steal the task from you, but if you can't get something like this working, I would appreciate some guidance as to what previously worked and how it failed.  In any case, I would very much like an improved edit bot, as what I have now is a simple, static cue of batch tasks to execute, either once or recursively. This is proving useful, but not as useful as I would like.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I deleted my user page, but still appears in the history. Please help me delete my pages at conservapedia.com and my conservapedia.com account. Please delete them.  (data-provider)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Merry Christmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Merry Christmas.gif|cebter|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merry Christmas!  And have a happy New Year's Day. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:49, 24 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Talmud and &amp;quot;taking things out of context&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I'm no anti-Semite. I may have my issues with the Talmud, but it strictly has to deal with how they treated God (not even Jesus, just God himself). And I would still fight to the death to protect Judaism and Israel itself especially from the likes of Islam, Stormfront, the KKK and the like. The types of Jews I do have immense respect for are the ones who adhere to the Torah only, or at least primarily.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second of all, surely you must have seen the parts in those quotes that specifically state where those quotes came from. And for the record, there were a few Jewish people who confirmed a lot of what was said in those quotes from the Talmud. Case in point: https://youtu.be/YSy6ENVAJlY And there was one person who converted to Christianity and testified what was in the Talmud. For example, Bernard Lazare, a French Jew who upon converting testified the Talmud's role in the Jewish revolts and also what actually was said in the Talmud.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third of all, I get enraged whenever someone claims I took something &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot;, and in fact am enraged with the phrase itself, because I only see it as an excuse to cover up bad things, like when people claim that Lenin took Marx &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot; when he did those evil things even when those were exactly the stuff Marx demanded that Communism should be done in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I used to naively believe that the Talmud was part of God's design, that the Jews still worshipped God even if they don't worship Jesus himself, but they don't, they if anything make him more like a plaything, and that I will NOT tolerate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:14, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, try to get a handle on your rage and focus your efforts on improving articles. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:21, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not actually enraged, or at least, I'm keeping a pretty tight lid on my rage, so I am getting quite a bit of a handle on my rage actually. Didn't resort to name calling. Anyways, I reverted your edit, because, 1., those quotes have been verified by countless people, some of whom were Rabbis themselves, and 2., if you really wanted to address that bit, you should have responded to it directly, not removed it. I also added your reply back in, though I had to change it slightly since, due to the quotes still being there, it wouldn't make sense to mention you removed the quotes. And again, those quotes weren't taken out of context, as even Yossi Gurvitz and Bernard Lazare verified those quotes were accurate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:24, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest you get back to what we were doing before you supplied all those Talmud quotes. Wasn't it something to do with Trump and a so-called &amp;quot;[[Muslim registry]]&amp;quot;? I could use some help with that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine, I'll help with that, as long as you stop taking those quotes out. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:28, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can appeal your block to Andy, Conservative, or any other admin. But issuing ultimatums and refusing alternatives is not a part of collaborative editing. Bye! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't making an ultimatum, nor was I refusing alternatives (if anything, I actually DID try to compromise by letting you retain your response while still keeping the quotes). Ironically, I WAS about to make a contribution to the Muslim Registry article when you blocked me. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 16:58, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sigh. You're right. I guess I was too hasty: no one else at Conservapedia whose opinion I value agreed with your block!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Forgive me? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009.  It is now registered and somewhat set up.  I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel.  Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering.  In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later.  If you are interested, please let me know!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:46, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you could implement this project, that would be excellent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable?  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The blue links on a dark red background is hard to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sorry for the late reply - I haven't been checking CP every day. Here is how to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 turn off] the background on the useful links, and here is how I [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 made the background light yellow]. Hope it helps. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:56, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, some people have started to edit Conservapedia and then quickly gave up because they didn't know how to edit a wiki.  I noted about 3 people who did this. There are probably many more who quit but didn't say anything. I added a link entitled &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot;.  But I believe there are various versions of the welcome template so my link is not on all welcome template versions. For example, the welcome template that JPatt uses didn't incorporate my &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot; link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the newest version of the Wikimedia software allow for WYSIWYG editing? In other words &amp;quot;What you see is what you get&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The newest version of the Wikimedia software does not have the counter at the bottom of the pages. I understand why Andy Schlafly likes the counters at the bottom. I like the counters too. I guess there might be an extension to add the counters to the newest version of Wikimedia. But after all is said and done, having WYSIWYG editing could greatly increase the participation rate at this wiki and lower the rate of people falling out because they don't know how to edit a wiki. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:40, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==== Here is the welcome to Wikipedia and it is much better and legible ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Plate of cookies.jpg|thumb|300px|Some cookies to welcome you! [[File:Face-smile.svg|25px]]]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]], Conservative! I am [[User:This lousy T-shirt|This lousy T-shirt]] and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Knox490|your contributions]]. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], or feel free to leave me a message on [[User talk:This lousy T-shirt|my talk page]] or type ''{{tl|helpme}}'' at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message!  I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Help:Contents|Help pages]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Article development|How to write a great article]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ten_Simple_Rules_for_Editing_Wikipedia Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia].&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Also, when you post on [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] you should [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] using four tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.  Again, welcome!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Conservapedia needs a better greeting. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:02, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks Ed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:05, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:37, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Done, but you've been around long enough. Why don't you ask Andy for blocking rights? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:39, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm confident he would use block right appropriately, but Andy might be hesitant to give the privilege to Sam.  Sam has been in a number of disputes, and has been banned a few times as well.  I'd support Sam getting the privilege, (I'd say he's more than earned it since I've been here alone, nevermind all the time before that) but I don't know if it could happen. Besides, aren't privileges generally given, not requested? --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:09, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::David, you have hit the nail right on the head.  Blocking rights are given, not requested.  And my long career here is full of blocks (19 of them), including blocks by people who were later revealed to be vandals or parodists:  DanielPulido and the notorious Markman.  And illicit blocks by &amp;quot;assistants&amp;quot; over content disputes.  (I seem to have a knack for upsetting bullies.)  And several blocks by my friend Conservative; we get along much better now.  And two by Ed Poor himself; I think we get along much better now; I won't bore you with the details.  When you've been around as long as I have, you develop a history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no interest in getting any special powers.  I like to think of myself as a &amp;quot;conscientious objector&amp;quot; in these wars.  People know that if they wrongly block me, I can't and won't fight back.  But others will (hopefully) undo the damage.  I think a lot of people respect me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But when big vandal attacks come along, and I can't get anyone else to take action, that's when I wish I had block powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you for your kind words.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::SamHB, you brought those blocks (none of which were &amp;quot;illicit&amp;quot; like you claim) down on yourself for the exact reasons DavidB4 pointed out, as well as for repeatedly and insistently putting liberal POV into some articles (including even now, with the [[fake news]] article two days ago) and for provoking fights (also including now). If you didn't insist on trying to turn Conservapedia into Liberalpedia, you wouldn't get chastized by the admins as much as you do. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It's true that I've had a hair-trigger for blocks, but you might not know that I often agonize over these and consult Andy by private email afterwards. It's not easy to admit that I've overstepped, but my record shows that I have SOMETIMES unblocked someone after a few moments (or days?) of reflection. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:31, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unrelated to what's above, Ed Poor, I see that several of your recent blocks have been indefinite. I used to do this a lot, but I no longer do because it can cause many innocent people to lose access to CP. Oftentimes, IP addresses get shifted around, so different, unrelated people end up using the same address at different times. That means that one indefinite block could affect many people over time. Also, vandals don't tend to be the type of people in a perminent location, so it is unlikely they will be using the same IP address after some time even if the address is the same in the same location. I recommend five-year blocks instead with even shorter blocks necessary for less serious vandalism. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;amp;diff=1304184&amp;amp;oldid=1303142 DavidB4 explained it better on my talk page.] Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:40, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== WOTUS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is [[Waters of the United States rule]] and [[Clean Water Rule]] the same thing? If so, they should be merged. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:48, 1 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The articles should be merged, although the two rules are slightly different. Can you do it? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:38, 2 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are many rules implementing the Clean Water Act.  Shouldn't you just have one comprehensive article about the Clean Water Act?  Also, we should have a separate article about the definition of &amp;quot;Navigatable Waters of the United States&amp;quot;, because this term defines federal jurisdiction in contexts beyond just the Clean Water Act.  It also defines the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers and the  old Federal Power Commission (now  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) with respect to the licensing of hydroelectric projects. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 04:54, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no objection, as long as readers will be able to understand what each of those hot-button phrases means, politically:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Navigable waters of the United States]] has nothing to do with navigation or shipping. It's merely a compromise between polluters and farmers on the one hand, and clean-water freaks or preservationists on the other. &lt;br /&gt;
:::*Similarly, the [[Clean Water Rule]] is not mostly about clean drinking water for people, but it also restricts legitimate (farm) use and delights the [[no-use]] environmental lobby&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The [[WOTUS]] rule is a variation on the Clean Water Rule that isn't so tough on farmers filling in a swamp (see [[Wetlands]]) to get more crop land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you two can make one article out of all this mess, go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi Uncle Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I'm finally here. I would love to get in touch with you again. You are a wonderful person, always very friendly. --[[User:Annie Poor|Annie Poor]] ([[User talk:Annie Poor|talk]]) 13:10, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Great to see you! ==&lt;br /&gt;
Great to see you, Ed!  Hope all is well.  It's fantastic to see a longtime friend again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:42, September 20, 2022 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi dear Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God bless you Ed Poor.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RobS is actually againt this LT behavior. &lt;br /&gt;
It's LT who blames Jews for Hitler, not RobS.&lt;br /&gt;
This is about LT, he just pasted it all from his talk page on to here.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:38, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice quotes on leadership on your user page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked the quotes on leadership that are on your user page.  I copied them to this page:  [[User:Conservative/Quotes]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:56, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hooray!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
You made my day, Ed!!!  So good to see you again.  I have the good memory of attending a certain college speech with you and others perhaps a decade ago.  So glad you're still active!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:57, October 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Larry Sanger==&lt;br /&gt;
I note you have good things to say about [[Larry Sanger]] who has professed his belief in [[Christianity]] in recent years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]] made the assertion that Larry Sanger was an [[atheist]] (totally untrue) and either [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=2070366&amp;amp;oldid=1976745 condoned or was a practitioner of bestiality] which was repeated in [https://therightscoop.com/why-should-a-conservative-bother-using-wikipedia/ conservative media]. After Sanger's conversion from [[agnosticism]] to Christianity I cleaned up the Wikipedia page and at least a half dozen other pages User:Conservative copy pasted his [[spam]] into. But he steadfastly refuses to clean up at least 342 other pages with his assertions, nor change his editing habits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:21, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Two decades ago, Larry said he was an atheist, but I never held that against him, particularly because I was at the time an active member in the most unpopular new religion in America. Both he and Jimbo Wales supported me as a preeminent expositor of &amp;quot;neutrality&amp;quot;. If there is anything that needs to be cleaned up, post it here or email me at uncle_ed_poor@yahoo.com. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:29, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Woman pilot accused of being a DEI hire ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Re: Woman helicopter pilot accused of being a DEI hire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;According to research and data, there is no significant difference in piloting ability between women and men, meaning women pilots can be just as good as male pilots when considering skill and competence; studies have shown that when factors like experience are controlled for, accident rates between genders are largely comparable.&amp;quot;[https://www.google.com/search?q=are+women+pilots+as+good+as+men&amp;amp;oq=are+woman+pilots+as+goo&amp;amp;gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqCAgBEAAYFhgeMgYIABBFGDkyCAgBEAAYFhgeMggIAhAAGBYYHjIICAMQABgWGB4yCAgEEAAYFhgeMg0IBRAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBhAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMg0IBxAAGIYDGIAEGIoFMgcICBAAGO8FMgYICRAuGEDSAQkxNDY5NGowajGoAgCwAgA&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But there is a long tradition of blaming women for calamity and incompetence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. &amp;quot;Women driver&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Adam blamed Eve.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S. I am waiting for FAA to give their ruling and I am not pre-judging matters. I haven't been following this news story closely. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope this clarifies matters. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:53, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't think the executive branch criticism was for her being a woman - but for being inexperienced, and pushed into a job to fill a DEI quota. I'll try to follow up on that. Anyway, the DEI controversy is a major part of the story. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:58, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2106044</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2106044"/>
		<updated>2025-02-01T23:56:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: I could be wrong&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This page is for intelligent discussion only related to Main Page content! We are attempting to better coordinate editors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for collaborative input on MPR news reporting. Non-MSM sources can be qualified for MPR use here. Please place your&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; contribution on the appropriate thread for other editors to participate and discuss. This will help focus priority content for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; inclusion on MPR. If you think the item you are sharing does not fit on an existing topic thread, feel free to create a new thread&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; at the bottom of the page. Our intent is to promote discussion and get readers and editors eyes off programmed MSM [[collective]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; herd [[brainwashing]], and to develop more of a consensus editorial stance among [[conservative]]s for wider distribution. We decide&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; what is news, not what is spoon fed us by the MSM. All other off-topic discussions, suggestions, socializing, frivolous rants,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; rehashing MSM garbage and [[spam]] should be posted at the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; '''[[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]'''.''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Donald Trump issues ultimatum to Putin over Ukraine war - 'it will only get worse'. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donald Trump issues ultimatum to Putin over Ukraine war - 'it will only get worse'.&lt;br /&gt;
US President Donald Trump has threatened Russia with steep tariffs and sanctions if the war in Ukraine does not come to an end soon.&lt;br /&gt;
Having barely settled back into the Oval Office since his second inauguration on Monday, the second term president has taken aim at a number of his pre-election promises. Now, Trump has posted a warning message to Russian president Vladimir Putin in which he called on him to end his brutal war in Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/breaking-donald-trump-issues-ultimatum-34533760&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump threatens Russia with sanctions, tariffs if Putin doesn't end Ukraine war.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/business/money-report/trump-threatens-russia-with-sanctions-tariffs-if-putin-doesnt-end-ukraine-war/6117555/?os=etcpasswd&amp;amp;ref=app&lt;br /&gt;
Let's pray for peace, everywhere. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 14:57, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Looks like posturing for domestic consumption. The [[MSM]]/[[Deep State]] don't want to tell the American people &amp;amp; Europe that [[NATO]] lost. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:08, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Several times I have seen you write that Ukraine or NATO lost. In order to declare a winner or loser in a war, the war must be completed. For example, if the Russian economy were to collapse or a civil war were to break out in Russia that resulted in the breakup of the Russian Federation that might throw a wrench in your triumphalism. Wars are unpredictable and so this type of premature triumphalism should be avoided. With that being said, Russia is a much bigger country than Ukraine population-wise and it has a big artillery advantage. In addition, &amp;quot;victories&amp;quot; can be [[Pyrrhic victory|pyrrhic victories]] and this could certainly be the case for Russia after the war is completed given its demographic crisis and the current problems with the Russian economy. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:40, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Trump's message to Putin was a mix of gratitude, urgency and warning to Russia as can be seen below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Trump's message to Russia.png|center|800px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the ''NY Post'' article on the matter: [https://nypost.com/2025/01/22/us-news/trump-tells-putin-to-end-ukraine-war-now-or-else-we-can-do-it-the-easy-way-or-the-hard-way/ Trump tells Putin to end Ukraine war now — or else: ‘We can do it the easy way, or the hard way’]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:04, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Zelensky]] needs to be removed from power before any Russia-Ukraine negotiations can begin. Trump can do that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:10, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Update: [[Putin]]: [[NATO war in Ukraine|Ukraine conflict]] could end in weeks,''' [https://www.rt.com/russia/611796-putin-ukraine-months-sponsors/] '''[[Zelensky]] lacks legitimacy to sign any deal.''' [https://www.rt.com/russia/611799-zelensky-talks-no-legitimacy/] '''Zelensky Must Go.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fact check: Trump's WWII rewrite – Russia didn’t just help, THEY WON&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. The Soviet Union played the decisive role in defeating Nazi Germany on WWII's Eastern Front, suffering over 20 million casualties, including 8.7 million military deaths. The Soviets inflicted approximately 80% of Germany’s total casualties (around 7.4 million).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. The US entered WWII on December 7, 1941, after the Pearl Harbor attack, while the Soviets had already been fighting Germany for six months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. The Soviets tied down most of Germany's forces, winning key battles like Stalingrad (1942-43) and Berlin (1945), which led to Nazi surrender.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. The US provided aid via the Lend-Lease Act, but it was the Red Army that did the heavy lifting, capturing Berlin and ending the war in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:05, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump, who stated that Russia's economy is failing, should take a look at the facts:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Russia has overtaken Japan to become the 4th LARGEST ECONOMY in the world (PPP).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Russia’s GDP grew by 4.1% in Q2 2024, OUTPERFORMING GERMANY, which saw a 0.3% contraction in 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Russia’s unemployment rate hit a HISTORIC LOW of 2.3%, compared to 3.6% in the U.S. and over 11% in Spain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. Russia’s budget deficit is just 1.7% of GDP, far LOWER THAN THE US at 5.8%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As to the threat of increased sanctions - bring it on. Sanctions, like Trump tariffs (or economic restrictions by any name), have only made Russia stronger. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:14, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Much of what Trump is saying now is &amp;quot;bravado&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;braggadocio&amp;quot; - he sounds like [[Khruschev]]. What is being done is quite different - &amp;quot;US aviation has sharply reduced flights to Rzeszow (Poland). According to the Flightradar portal, since January 20, only four aircraft have arrived in Poland: two from the American air bases of [[Ramstein]] and Wiesbaden in Germany, and two more from the US bases Wright-Patterson and Dover....the United States have withdrawn all their applications for the transit of goods in the interests of Kyiv through the airports of Rzeszow and Constanta (Romania) and Varna (Bulgaria). At NATO bases in Europe, all shipments to Ukraine have been suspended and closed. According to foreign military analysts, this is on the order of several thousand tons of weapons and equipment.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
::One of your own favorite sources that you have cited on MPR several times says about these NATO shipments being supposedly suspended to Ukraine: &amp;quot;The below is not yet corroborate, but it claims that all shipments to Ukraine have been suspended&amp;quot;.[https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/trump-storms-out-the-gate-but-already?utm_source=post-email-title&amp;amp;publication_id=1351274&amp;amp;post_id=155115182&amp;amp;utm_campaign=email-post-title&amp;amp;isFreemail=true&amp;amp;r=9fiuo&amp;amp;triedRedirect=true&amp;amp;utm_medium=email] So this appears to be a rumor. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:23, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is in keeping with Trump's pledge to take steps to end the war in 24 hours. These are good faith or confidence building measures. To remove these changes now will only cost more money, which Trump would have to ask Congress for.&lt;br /&gt;
:Putin's not stupid; he knows Trump is not going to become another neocon war hawk, leading the charge to ask Congress for more money for more [[perpetual war]] ([[Tulsi Gabbard]] would resign first). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump's in the same place Nixon was - elected as the peace candidate but doesn't want to be seen as losing a war. So he's going  to have to swallow a bitter pill, like Biden in Afghanistan, and cut n run at some point. As Trump says, &amp;quot;NO MORE LIVES SHOULD BE LOST&amp;quot;. He can begin by cutting Zelensky loose. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:37, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::What percentage of Russia's GDP is related to war related spending? Are there any problems with Russia's economy such as high inflation and rising company bankruptcies? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:50, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::What percentage of the US's GDP is related to war related spending? Are there any problems with the US's economy such as high inflation and rising company bankruptcies? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:55, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In 2022, the United States spent 3.45% of its GDP on defense.[https://www.google.com/search?q=us+defense+spending+as+a+percentage+of+gdp&amp;amp;oq=us+defense+spending+as+a+per&amp;amp;gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBwgAEAAYgAQyBwgAEAAYgAQyBwgBEAAYgAQyBggCEEUYOTIICAMQABgWGB4yCAgEEAAYFhgeMggIBRAAGBYYHjIICAYQABgWGB4yCAgHEAAYFhgeMggICBAAGBYYHjIGCAkQLhhA0gEJMjA0ODdqMGoxqAIAsAIA&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8]  &amp;quot;Russia is hiking state spending on national defence by a quarter in 2025 to 6.3% of gross domestic product (GDP), the highest levels since the Cold War, according to draft budget documents published on Monday.&amp;quot;[https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-hikes-national-defence-spending-by-23-2025-2024-09-30/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Inflation in the USA is much lower than in Russia which is why there is not a rash of butter stealing like what is happening in Russia (See: [https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/25/russias-inflation-is-so-bad-that-people-are-stealing-butter.html#:~:text=A%20standard%20200g%20stick%20of,rampant%20price%20rises%20in%20Russia. Russian food prices are soaring — but no one dares blame Putin and the war] and [https://www.newsweek.com/russians-resort-stealing-butter-amid-shortages-1976575 Russians Resort to Stealing Butter Amid Shortages]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::&amp;quot;Russia’s central bank last month hiked interest rates to 21% — their highest level in more than 20 years — but the high rates have shown few signs of dampening inflation so far.&amp;quot;[https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/25/russias-inflation-is-so-bad-that-people-are-stealing-butter.html#:~:text=A%20standard%20200g%20stick%20of,rampant%20price%20rises%20in%20Russia.] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::In 2025, it doesn't look like US company bankruptcies are going to go up due to a favorable economy under Trump being expected (See: [https://www.marketwatch.com/story/another-bullish-call-for-stocks-in-2025-wells-fargo-raises-s-p-500-target-on-strong-economy-trumps-policy-changes-455d76e6 Another bullish call for stocks in 2025. Wells Fargo raises S&amp;amp;P 500 target on strong economy, Trump’s policy changes]).  On the other hand, Russian company bankruptcies may certainly rise (See: [https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/11/11/russia-faces-a-wave-of-bankruptcies-as-borrowing-costs-skyrocket-a86981 Russia Faces a Wave of Bankruptcies as Borrowing Costs Skyrocket]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:18, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Big deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/its-official-us-abandoning-ukraine It's Official: US Abandoning Ukraine], Kit Klarenberg&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://news.antiwar.com/2025/01/20/a-ukrainian-victory-was-never-bidens-goal-time-magazine/ A Ukrainian Victory Was Never Biden’s Goal: Time Magazine], Dave DeCamp&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://time.com/7207661/bidens-ukraine-win-zelensky-loss/ Why Biden’s Ukraine Win Was Zelensky’s Loss], ''[[Time magazine]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:32, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::JD Vance: &amp;quot;My whole argument with the Russia-Ukraine (war) is that Russia should have never invaded Ukraine, a lot of innocent people are being killed... Our interest is in peace. But part of that is motivated by my view that Ukraine is not nearly as important to us as other regions of the world, right? Just putting my cards on the table,&amp;quot; Vance told Tim Dillon, an American stand-up comedian, who questioned Vance on various topics, including those related to foreign policy.&amp;quot;[https://kyivindependent.com/jd-vance-says-taiwan-more-vital-to-us-than-ukraine-due-to-key-role-in-chip-production/]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Vance is correct. Ukraine is not of vital importance to the USA compared to other regions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Anyways, I agree with Trump that Putin should make a deal as its economy is showing strain. And Russia doesn't need more land as it is struggling to defend its big country due in part to [https://decline-of-russia.blogspot.com/2024/11/russias-demographic-crisis.html its  demographic crisis]. &amp;quot;Britannica explained that a failed state is the one that “cannot protect its national boundaries.” April 26, 2023 head of the Russian Committee of defense of the Russian State Duma suggested that Russian citizens should be mobilized to protect Russian borders acknowledging that Russia has no resources for that, comparing the current inability of the state to the previous mighty USSR.&amp;quot; -  [https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/05/03/russia-has-failed-as-a-state/ Russia has failed as a state], Modern Diplomacy, 2023. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:47, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Old news for domestic consumption.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[NATO]] lost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[Trump]] is not going to escalate war with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you want to understand the issues to bring the Russians to the table, read [[David T. Pyne]]: [https://dpyne.substack.com/p/how-an-end-to-the-war-in-ukraine How an end to the war in Ukraine could be achieved in days, not months]. No amount of American braggadocio or bluster will change that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:17, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Regarding history / past - no doubt about glorious Russian part in WW2. Great soldiers (including sizable Jews: half a million!), fought heroically. We, the US got involved much later, of course.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:31, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://youtu.be/FeYhd6uNMpo A Soldier of the Unknown War]. An hour well spent. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:19, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Remember how Trump told Israel to wrap up the war in Gaza? Well, history may be rhyming as far as the war in Ukraine. ''Times of India'' video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMrKCImd91c Trump’s Warning ‘Forces’ Putin To Dial China’s Xi; Talks Ending Russia-Ukraine War? Inside Details] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Sm9cqy8G8 Trump &amp;amp; China Drop BAD NEWS on Russia over Ukraine War]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Question: Is Trump's upcoming tariff pressure on China causing China to put pressure on Russia to end the war in Ukraine? Trump [https://www.rt.com/news/606884-trump-divide-russia-china/ said he was going to un-unite the China-Russia partnership]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:38, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You are sorely delusional if you think Putin can be intimidated or threatened. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::The Putin-Xi phone call was scheduled in mid-December, and readouts from both countries express solidarity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::You evidentially still have learned nothing by reading and following [[Western]] [[globalist]] [[media]] and [[propaganda]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:45, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Here's the problem [[the West]] faces: the [[Russian]]s have been lied to and deceived so much by the West, a written [[treaty]] or promises are meaningless at this point. Trump cannot personally guarantee anything beyond 4 years. And Russia is not interested in a four year pause so NATO/Ukraine can rearm. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:53, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Russia is the junior partner in the China-Russia partnership. If you think the atheist Xi Jinping is going to be loyal and put Russia above himself if he is enough hot water (For example, a worsening Chinese economy and threats of higher tariffs from Trump. China is already facing multiple economic crisis such as deflation, a property crisis, high youth unemployment, etc.), you are fooling yourself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I agree with the billionaire Donald Trump concerning Russia's economy over your view of Russia's economy and Russia's Central Bank recently set a sky-high interest rate.  [https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2024/10/16/russian-ceo-blames-interest-rate-volatility-on-central-bank-governor-being-a-woman-en-news Russian CEO blames interest rate volatility on Central Bank governor being a woman], &amp;quot;Andrey Kostin was asked in an interview with state-owned TV channel Rossiya 24 whether the Russian Central Bank’s key interest rate could reach 25% next year and responded that it was difficult to predict because the process was “led by women”. “Yes, when women lead the process, almost anything is possible,” he said.&amp;quot; [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:07, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Russia's economy may not imminently collapse, but to pretend Russia does not have significant economic problems is delusional. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:17, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Look, you're just spouting off on things you have no interest in or understanding of, and confusing young readers who genuinely wish to learn. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:21, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::For the amount of bytes you expend, and time wasted [[spamming]], it makes as much sense as [[Biden]] calling [[J6]]ers &amp;quot;insurrectionists&amp;quot; while at the same time saying if you want to have an insurrection, you need [[F-16]]s. It's not worth the time and trouble reading or responding to. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:28, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since you are not a mind reader, I find your response wanting. The fact remains that many Russia business people are struggling under variable rate business loans and sky high interest rates and the Russian company bankruptcy rate is rising (See: [https://meduza.io/en/feature/2024/11/08/as-corporate-debts-in-russia-balloon-under-rising-interest-rates-a-wave-of-bankruptcies-could-be-on-the-horizon#:~:text=Officially%2C%20corporate%20bankruptcies%20in%20Russia,to%20delay%20servicing%20their%20debts. As corporate debts in Russia balloon under rising interest rates, a wave of bankruptcies could be on the horizon]). &lt;br /&gt;
::::You'rw right, I'm not a mind reader. I read your pointless, meaningless [[spam]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:55, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Trump is right. Russia should cut a deal as quickly as possible as its economy is having a lot of problems. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://youtu.be/ohHJ8pyKofw There you again]. I'm not going to play this stupid game with you of tit-for-tat irrelevant, off topic [[spam]] to make some meaningless point in your imagination. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:52, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Trump has been prescient about many things. Donald Trump:  “He has to make a deal. I think he is destroying Russia by not making a deal. I think Russia is going to be in big trouble.”[https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/breaking-donald-trump-issues-ultimatum-34533760]  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:56, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Educate yourself, and don't spam: [https://karlof1.substack.com/p/putin-reports-preliminary-2024-economic Putin Reports Preliminary 2024 Economic Results and General 2025 Outlook]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:59, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Putin is a terrible forecaster. Putin promised that Russia could have a [[Guns and butter economic concept|guns and butter economy]] and that prediction failed big time.  &lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh, you think Putin pulled it out of his butt, and this isn't the work of Russian bureaucrats, economists, and the [[World Bank]]? You haven't even read it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The more you post, the more you discredit yourself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:11, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed that Russia's war economy was well balanced to supply both guns and butter, but the price of butter itself is now soaring as surging inflation distorts parts of the economy. The price of a block of butter has risen by 25.7 per cent since December, according to the state statistics service.[https://www.newsweek.com/russians-resort-stealing-butter-amid-shortages-1976575] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:05, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://slaynews.com/news/russian-military-blows-whistle-bill-gates-bioterrorism-reduce-population/ Russian Military Blows Whistle on Bill Gates’ ‘Bioterrorism’ Plot to ‘Reduce Population’]. Hmm, you think the rest of the planet and [[MAGA]] consider this as &amp;quot;Russian propaganda&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
:::C'mon now - you've been an ardent proponent of [[Biden]] [[foreign policy]] &amp;amp; the [[Russia Russia Russia hoax]] for 3 solid years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:07, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Your bad habit of gossiping while badly losing debates endures. Nevertheless, I voted for Trump each time he won an election. As much as I hate to do it, I declare victory! The billionaire Trump is right about Russia's economy and you are wrong. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:11, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Look at the facts: You have been an ardent proponent of [[Biden]] [[foreign policy]] &amp;amp; the [[Russia Russia Russia hoax]] for 3 years now, until [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Conservative&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2102033 you started to walk it back this] morning. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::And this after I personally advised you on the phone 3 years ago to avoid going down this path. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:17, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::As a person who voted for Trump each time he was elected, I am bullish on Trump's second term in office and the possibility that JD Vance will be elected after him. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::In addition, concerning Russia's overall future, I still agree with the international relations scholar John Mearsheimer who predicted the war in Ukraine. John Mearsheimer wrote: &amp;quot;Russia is a declining power, and it will only get weaker with time.&amp;quot;[https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-08-18/why-ukraine-crisis-west-s-fault]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Next, I have walked back nothing. China and Russia are going to wane in power and influence and Trump will accelerate this matter. So I see no reason to be inordinately focused on the machinations of declining powers. “Winners have no interest or association in the opinions, actions or affairs of losers.” - Jeffrey Fry.  Now my user page focuses more on a very great power - namely, Jesus and the kingdom of God! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPLEAWsX0qk Lester Lewis &amp;amp; Singing Rose Ministry - Winnaman]. &amp;quot;I am on the winning side, the winning side, the winning side. I am on the winning side every time.&amp;quot; - Dr. Lester Lewis. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:43, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, while you are busy [[spamming]] your nonsense, you are missing the story (and impeding my efforts) about Trump draining the swamp:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''''[[WaPo]]:'' [[National Security Advisor]] [[Mike Waltz]] sends home''' dozens of employees responsible for [[Ukraine]], [[Iran]] and [[North Korea]], suspending them from work. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2025/01/22/trump-waltz-national-security-council-officials/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''[[President Trump]] restructures [[National Security Council]]''' and removes [[IC]] influence. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/01/21/president-trump-restructures-the-national-security-council-and-removes-ic-influence/] The real reason [[Mike Turner]] was ousted from [[HPSCI]]. [https://dailycaller.com/2025/01/21/mike-turner-intel-committee-fisa-702-mike-johnson/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Reports: [[Pentagon]] has fired and suspended everyone''' who was responsible for [[NATO war in Ukraine|Ukraine]] and [[Ukraine aid]]. [https://x.com/NOELreports/status/1881826337780031865][https://t.me/llordofwar/409924][https://avia-pro.net/news/v-pentagone-uvoleny-i-otstraneny-vse-kto-otvechal-za-ukrainu-i-voennuyu-pomoshch-kievu#google_vignette] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Kit Klarenberg: It's official: [[US]] abandoning [[Ukraine]].''' [https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/its-official-us-abandoning-ukraine] A Ukrainian victory was never [[Biden]]'s goal: Time magazine. [https://scheerpost.com/2025/01/22/a-ukrainian-victory-was-never-bidens-goal-time-magazine/][https://time.com/7207661/bidens-ukraine-win-zelensky-loss/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was [[Alexander Vindman]] &amp;amp; [[Eric Ciaramella]] who got Trump impeached the first time. Trump has to get rid of all those like-minded swamp creatures first before he can engage Putin. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:54, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I am impeding nothing. You should just agree with Trump that [https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5100263-trump-threatens-tariffs-russia-ukraine-war/ Putin is ruining Russia with his ridiculous war in Ukraine] and that he should make a deal quick in light of the big problems it is causing the Russian economy. And Trump and I appear to agree that Putin's invasion of Ukraine in February of 2022 was a foolish decision. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:00, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Trump said Putin couldn't be happy with the slow progress of his war against Ukraine — nearly three years after he ordered an... assault, and 11 years after disguised Russian troops first entered Ukraine's Crimean peninsula. &amp;quot;He’s grinding it out. Most people thought it would last about one week and now you’re into three years. It is not making him look good,&amp;quot; Trump said... &amp;quot;Russia’s bigger, they have more soldiers to lose but that’s no way to run a country,&amp;quot; he added.&amp;quot;[https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-vladimir-putin-russia-ukraine-war-destroying/]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Trump agrees with me that Putin is not running Russia well. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:10, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You indeed are [[trolling]], posting redundant [[spam]], and impeding my efforts to create content and write about the late breaking news of Donald Trump draining the swamp, so I post the source links here. Show some courtesy and save your trolling nonsense about Russian inflation &amp;amp; bankruptcies for some other time in an appropriate place. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Axios: [https://www.axios.com/2025/01/22/trump-national-security-council-civil-servants The Trump administration is screening the loyalty of approximately 160 career civil servants assigned to the National Security Council.]''' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:08, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I already complained to Andy just now about your [[trolling]] and pointlessly wasting my time. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:13, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Andy is a very big supporter of Trump - just like his mother. He can't be happy that you are siding with Putin and not agreeing with Trump that Putin should cut a deal quick and end this ridiculous war as soon as possible.  And he can't be happy that you are not taking Trump's side that the war in Ukraine is very significantly hurting the Russian economy. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:22, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://sonar21.com/cia-busy-polishing-its-ukraine-legacy/ CIA Busy Polishing Its Ukraine Legacy].&lt;br /&gt;
:''You know the end is nearing in Ukraine when the CIA — i.e., the Director and unnamed US government officials — start dishing on what-we did-in-Ukraine-that-was-so-great. The CIA storyline is simple, this was not our fault. It would be hilarious if this was just a bungled coup where no one died. But that is not the case. There are more than a million dead, mostly Ukrainian, as a result of CIA activities, starting with the Maidan of February 2024'' [sic; should read ''2014''].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:33, January 22, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Korybko]]: ''[[Steve Bannon]] warned earlier this week that Ukraine could turn into Trump's Vietnam if he doesn’t swiftly end the conflict like he promised, recalling how the precedent of [[Nixon]] ultimately taking ownership of [[LBJ]]'s war might lead to Trump taking ownership of Biden’s. According to him, a trap is being set for Trump by the [[military-industrial complex]], the Europeans, and some misguided friends like new special envoy to Ukraine and Russia [[Keith Kellogg]].'' [https://korybko.substack.com/p/polands-president-is-trying-to-trick]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:18, January 23, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Looks like Trump may own the [[war]] now: &lt;br /&gt;
::*''&amp;quot;The oil refinery in Ryazan, Russia, is under massive attack by Ukrainian drones. [https://t.me/BellumActaNews/139451]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*''&amp;quot;drones attacked Smolensk [Belarus]. The targets, preliminary, were the Smolensk aircraft plant and the Yartsevo oil refinery. One of the drones hit a residential building, starting a strong fire. The fire engulfed six floors (video 1). ▪️About 1:34 the UAV fell near a clinical hospital in Smolensk, writes Mash. Another high-rise building was damaged. At 2 a.m., power and water went out in several houses [https://t.me/llordofwar/409571][https://t.me/ForeignAgentIntel/13401]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*''&amp;quot;The enemy is trying to break through to Moscow: explosions in Ramenskoye, Podolsk, Kolomna and Shchelkovo ▪️UAV attacks flying towards Moscow were repelled by air defense forces in Kolomna, Ramenskoye, Podolsk and Shchelkovo, said the mayor of the capital Sergei Sobyanin. ▪️There is no information about destruction or casualties at the sites where the debris fell. Emergency services specialists work in incident areas. ❗️Also, the attack on Ryazan has been going on for more than an hour, more than 20 explosions have occurred]]  [https://t.me/llordofwar/410531]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::IMO, Russian general Staff may be considering and recommending an [[Oreshnik]] retaliatory strike now. Hopefully, within the territory of Ukraine [although an Oreshnik could take out a Supercarrier]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:31, January 23, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::And per [[CIA]]/[[Pentagon]] thinking, they may want to provoke an Oreshnik strike - to learn more about the weapon. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:34, January 23, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Truce by Easter, peace by May 9===&lt;br /&gt;
'''Update:''' Anonymous sources familiar with the matter tell me the Russians will demand new [[Ukrainian]] elections before peace talks. [[Zelensky]]'s term of office expired in May 2023, so no negotiations or agreements can [[legal]]ly be conducted or concluded with [[Zelensky]]. Zelensky, with a 16% approcal rating, will lose those elections. Front runners now are [[Zaluzhny]] &amp;amp; [[Arestovich]]. (Both have been exiled outside the country).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottomline: The longer Zelensky clings to power, the more people will die. It would be best for him to resign immediately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is what is likely to develop in the 100 days since [[Trump]] broke his promise to end the war in 24 hours. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a side note, I speculate Gen. [[Keith Kellogg]] will be the Special Guest of Honor at the [[May 9 Victory Day]] Parade in [[Red Square]], 109 days after Trump was inaugurated. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:09, January 26, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Update: [https://strana.today/news/478985-peremirie-k-paskhe-mir-k-9-maja-v-politkruhakh-obsuzhdaetsja-100-dnevnyj-plan-trampa.html Truce by Easter, peace by May 9. Trump's &amp;quot;100-day plan&amp;quot; is being discussed in political circles]. (only [[Zelensky]] has to be disposed of first. I suspect [[Trump]] might relish this, given Zelensky &amp;amp; [[Crowdstrike]]'s role in the [[Russiagate]]).[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:07, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looks like the public is being prepped for the inevitable:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukrainian Gestapo]] chief [[Kirill Budanov]]: [https://t.me/glenndiesen/608  Ukraine may cease to exist by summer without peace talks]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:01, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Zerohedge]]: [https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/russian-forces-officially-seize-last-strategic-city-southern-donbas-region Russian Forces Officially Seize Last Strategic City In Southern Donbas Region].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The USA protects borders from Ukrainian refugees. The American Citizenship and Immigration Service announced the suspension of the U4U program (United for Ukraine), allowing Ukrainian citizens and their closest relatives to come to the United States for two years. &amp;quot;The US Citizenship and Immigration Service suspends the acceptance of the form I-134A, the online provision and declaration of financial support&amp;quot;, the department said. The solution is related to the decree of Trump on the day of the inauguration on the protection of the borders of the USA.  the new york times. That there are 150 thousand Ukrainian refugees in America. [https://t.me/llordofwar/411782]&lt;br /&gt;
:''This item should be MPR news, but because of the [[Russophobia]], [[hate]], and support for [[Biden]] [[foreign policy]] [[User:Conservative]] has engendered among readers for 3 years now, it would be too confusing.'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:15, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Trump to reverse sanctions on 'Pro-Putin' [[Hungary]]. [https://youtu.be/E1CcBnVm0b8] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:04, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hegseth seems likely to be confirmed. Hopefully  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of now, I think he has the votes, [https://nypost.com/2025/01/23/us-news/pete-hegseth-nomination-clears-key-senate-hurdle-as-two-republicans-signal-opposition/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 18:11, January 23, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Are they going to vote today? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:20, January 23, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tarrio is on the outside ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see a political future for this man. Senator Tarrio? Governor Tarrio? Check it out: &amp;quot;[https://news.yahoo.com/news/ex-proud-boys-leader-enrique-014910687.html Ex-Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio back home after Trump's Jan. 6 clemency].&amp;quot; [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 07:27, January 24, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Covid: Conservatives vindicated: CIA leans toward China Wuhan leak theory ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/cia-now-favors-lab-leak-theory-on-origins-of-covid-19-eff4e67c Better late than never. But still, way too late.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yah but they rate it &amp;quot;low confidence&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There's a double edge to this story: It fulfills [[Ratcliffe]]'s promise to declassify on Day One, but it also plays into the hands of Sinophobes and [[warmonger]]s who want to ignore [[Fauci]]'s crimes who funded the research. Best that can be said is, it likely was an accident and negligence, and not a deliberate Act of War.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:09, January 26, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It all seems to be. AFTER FBI statements...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''In doing so, the CIA has now joined the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Energy Department in identifying a laboratory mishap in Wuhan, China, as the probable source of the Covid virus. It has killed more than 1.2 million Americans and over seven million people worldwide.''[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:16, January 26, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The big crime remains in [[Washington, D.C.]], and not in China. The [[Wuhan]] leak was probably an accident, the immediate mishandling was negligent and exposed the [[corruption]] in the Chinese system, but the deliberate politicization in the [[United States]] to take advantage of the crisis to thwart [[Trump]]'s re-election was [[criminal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The 1.2 million deaths statement still obscures many facts and seems dubious; then we have the problem of the [[covid vaccine]], which is an entirely separate issue. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:24, January 26, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ultimately, if the truth can ever be told, more people likely will die from the vaccine than from the infection itself. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:38, January 26, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Columbian coffee==&lt;br /&gt;
IMO, it is a mistake to trumpet the threat of [[tariff]]s on [[Columbia]]n [[coffee]] in MPR, cause the tariffs can still be imposed any time after [[Valentine's Day]], [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2025/01/26/beyond-perfect-timing-colombia-refuses-repatriation-flights-what-trump-does-is-beyond-epic/] leading to skyrocketing coffee prices in the USA. But some editors love dining on crow, so let's wait and see what happens. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:16, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Colombia Caves to Gringo El Presidente.jpeg|right|400px|thumb|Colombia Caves to Gringo El Presidente.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Updates: Colombia says “we will look for other countries, you can’t treat us like inferior race” [https://t.me/AussieCossack/31846]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:hmmm, wow. I guess [[tariff]]s may be [[racist]];&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The President of Columbia Gustavo Petro Is Offering HIS Presidential Plane to Repatriate Colombis Returning Home. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Wow. Why would they be in such a hurry? Guess we haven't heard the last of it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(Incidentally, there is a very high number, one of the highest from any country, of Columbian [[mercenaries]] working for the [[CIA]], [[NATO]], and the [[SBU]] in [[Ukraine]]. [https://t.me/thisiswarchannel/3005] Even female mercenaries. [https://t.me/AussieCossack/31683] I guess the pay there is better than anything they can get in Columbia. Don't worry, however; the US taxpayer isn't on the hook for sending the bags of fertilizer back home. Mercenaries, under [[international law]], typically are shot on the spot and disposed of right there.).[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:49, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MPR is not a random collection of links that always go to the top. Each item is part of continuity, or narrative construction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, an editor who contributes must also commit to follow up news, building and updating the blue links that link from MPR on a timely basis. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:25, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:Conservative]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Don't [[spam]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Discuss rationally, and learn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::MPR is not a place to park random [[sensationalism]] headlines that catch your eye.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is a [[policy]] discussion. DO NOT SPAM. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:12, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::A personal observation: IMHO, in the larger scheme of things in the coming trade wars, the 10 hour trade war with Columbia is not a time for chest thumping. It was kinda like watching a male [[transgender]] boxer beat the hell out of a girl in a girl's sport. The other shoe is yet to drop. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:12, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Update: [[Gustavo Petro]]'s handling of trade conflict sparks domestic political instability in Columbia. [https://colombiaone.com/2025/01/28/colombia-liberal-party-government-coalition-petro/]&lt;br /&gt;
:Update: Petro: “we will look for other countries, you can’t treat us like inferior race”. China's ambassador to Colombia: &amp;quot;we are at the best moment of our diplomatic relations…&amp;quot;. [https://deepnewz.com/china/china-s-ambassador-to-colombia-declares-best-moment-45-year-diplomatic-relations-679a843a]&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, you think it's that easy to threaten and humiliate other countries [https://princetalleyrand.substack.com/p/how-to-kowtow-32f to get them to kowtow?] Only a [[fool]] would think so. Yah, I'm talking to you Mr. DeMyer. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:39, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Update: Petro's daughter threatens to arrest and deport an [[American]] [[pedophile]] in Columbia for each Columbian deported. [https://potustoast.com/colombian-presidents-daughter-threatens-president-trump-for-every-colombian-deported/] That would be a lot of American pedophiles, evidently. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:43, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 'God created people to love' [[holocaust]] survivor at UN ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''See the 'spark of humanity' in an evil era - diabolical low bar...'''&lt;br /&gt;
From :&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/402977 'God created people to love, not to hate:' Holocaust survivor addresses UN]. (1.27.2025).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Below is the full speech, which Marianne Miller delivered accompanied by her four children and seven grandchildren today at the [[UN]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“My name is Marianne Miller, and I am a Holocaust survivor. I represent the remaining Holocaust survivors, who are getting older, weaker, and sicker, leaving us day by day. I was a baby during the Holocaust, but I can still say it, clear and loud:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I have been there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My parents, Alfred and Violetta Nobel, were a young couple deeply in love. Before my father was taken to a labor camp, my mother wanted to become pregnant. My father was against it. ‘You don’t bring a child into a world where sure death is waiting for them everywhere,’ he said. But my mother, so in love, replied, ‘Maybe one of us will stay alive, and they will have a memory of the other.’&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Under these conditions, I came into the world – a world where death awaited me at every corner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Budapest, 1944. A freezing December night. Mothers are marching with their babies in deadly silence, heading toward the railway station. The destination: Auschwitz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Then, something unprecedented happened. With a sudden movement, my mother tore off her yellow star and ran out of the line, holding me in her arms. She hid under a gate, thinking no one had seen her.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;But a young Hungarian Nazi chased after her, shouting and aiming his rifle at her chest. ‘How dare you take off the yellow star?’ he roared. ‘Now I’m going to kill your child and make you watch. Then you’ll go back to the line without your baby.’&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There was no point in begging for mercy. All my mother had was a thin golden wedding ring. She held it out to him, saying: ‘Look! Look! You kill people and take their jewelry, &amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;but this ring is different – it is not covered in blood. It shines because you didn’t murder anyone for it. Take it. There is a blessing on it. You gave life to a mother and her child. Take it!&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;’&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Maybe, in that one moment, he found a spark of humanity within himself. He didn’t follow her. He let her run, and we were saved.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My father’s story is no less remarkable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Taken to the hunger camp of Bergen-Belsen, he survived on one slice of bread per week. He had the willpower to divide it into seven pieces, eating one each day. At liberation, he weighed only 35 kilos – the weight of a child.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Most of my family was not as fortunate. Many were shot into the Danube River. My mother’s sister Nicolet, a partisan, was executed. My cousin Gabor, just 13 years old, was killed – he could have become a world-famous poet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Today, I stand here having lost my husband, Yoel, two months ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He was my best friend for 58 years. As a child, he survived the Terezin concentration camp, becoming a father figure to his baby brother.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Last April, I was honored to lead the March of the Living in Budapest and Auschwitz. I was deeply shaken by the mountains of shoes, glasses, and hair left behind. Six million lives were brutally taken simply for being Jewish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I came here today with my children and grandchildren – my personal answer to Hitler.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Antisemitism is lifting its ugly head again across the world. We must remember: God created people to love, not to hate. God wants to be proud of mankind, not ashamed of it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I represent today the six million Holocaust victims who were murdered just because they were Jewish. I demand the world remember what happened only 80 years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Never. Never. Never, let it happen again.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(See spiritual [[Resistance: They Fought Back]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 16:02, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you D for this very HUMAN story. As tragically sad this uniquely dark chapter in human history is.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 18:07, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I read that antisemitic incidents in the USA more than tripled since October 2023. Antisemitism is rising in Europe too. This partly explains this stat: [https://www.timesofisrael.com/over-29000-immigrants-have-moved-to-israel-since-october-7-wzo-says/ Over 29,000 immigrants have moved to Israel since October 7, WZO says]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope the farther we go from the Gaza situation being settled, the more antisemitism will wane. The public often has a short memory span. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:40, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Worth mentioning, the rise is  antisemitism is mainly by [[Muslims]]===  &lt;br /&gt;
Such as (1) in [https://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2025/01/adl-antisemitism-global-survey-shows.html?m=1 Muslim countries] (w/o even counting [[Pakistan]] &amp;amp; [[Syria]]),&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Adl index 2024 (1).jpg|thumb|ADL antisemitism global survey shows Muslim countries are still the most antisemitic - and getting worse]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(2) incitement by Islamic groups in non-Muslim countries have also contributed. Such as the SJP and other [[Muslim Brotherhood]] linked &amp;quot;activists&amp;quot; -- the core of &amp;quot;protests.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And Germans, for instance, just as they distanced themselves from [[WW2]] evil, came the 1 Million [[Arab]] immigrants influx. [https://www.hoover.org/research/islamism-and-immigration-germany-and-european-context The post-war efforts to “come to terms with the Nazi past” and to reject the legacy of antisemitism represent one of the main features of modern Germany’s path toward liberal democracy. Yet precisely this German refusal of antisemitism has become a point of conflict with Muslim immigration and assimilation. Many immigrants arrive from countries where antisemitic attitudes are widespread, and these attitudes have fueled some of the anti-Israel protests in Germany].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/antisemitism-among-muslim-migrants-unsettles-a-germany-haunted-by-the-holocaust-ff359e73 Antisemitism Among Muslim Migrants Unsettles a Germany Haunted by the Holocaust].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let's not forget what [https://www.jns.org/mein-kampf-in-gaza-and-beyond/ areas, the highest percentage of Hitler admiration] has been at, in the last decades. No one is born a racist. It's all about education (one look at their textbooks or/and ar memri.org, palwatch.org how they groom the young, shows what the M.E. conflict is really about). &lt;br /&gt;
You're right that seeing war results does not help.  Especially when radical left uses it so efficiently for its own overall agenda.  It's very easy to blame the non-Arab side and very difficult to expose how Islamists terror regimes/groups cynically use civilians VS perception of &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot;, seeing deaths. &lt;br /&gt;
Despite [https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2023/11/01/hamas-officials-admit-its-strategy-is-to-use-palestinian-civilians-as-human-shields/ own admission], and accusation by [[Palestinian Authority| &amp;quot;Palestinian&amp;quot; govt]] itself [https://palwatch.org/page/36841 Palestinian Authority: Hamas disguised as civilians caused civilian deaths and destruction of Gaza] and despite that&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.newsweek.com/israel-has-created-new-standard-urban-warfare-why-will-no-one-admit-it-opinion-1883286 Israel Has Created a New Standard for Urban Warfare. Why Will No One Admit It?] And the final results Jan/2025 &amp;quot;civilian/combatant ratio: ~1:1&amp;quot; prove that. [https://x.com/Aizenberg55/status/1879905170856829179][https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GhbCoQnWYAAYHZM?format=jpg&amp;amp;name=900x900]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Combatant ratio- ~1-1.jpg|thumb|[[Oct 7 war]]. 1.20.25: Civilian/combatant ratio: ~1:1]]&lt;br /&gt;
May God help us all.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:13, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Gay marriage|Gay married]] [[Trump]] Treasury Secretary [[Scott Bessent]] confirmed by [[Senate]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I'll leave coverage of this news to [[User:Conservative]], [https://therightscoop.com/breaking-scott-bessent-confirmed-as-president-trumps-new-treasury-secretary/] who appears to be an effective cheerleader on these issues. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:11, January 27, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-man-arrested-at-capitol-with-molotov-cocktails-wanted-to-kill-treasury-sec-scott-bessent-police?utm_campaign=64483 BREAKING: Man arrested at Capitol with Molotov cocktails wanted to kill Treasury Sec Scott Bessent: police].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably another nutjob who read [[User:Conservative]]'s [[gay bashing]] article. Let's see if he uses the [[Conservapedia]] defense. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:04, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sara Haines admits 'View' co-hosts don't know what Americans think because none of them voted for Trump. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Sara Haines]] admits '[[The View]]' co-hosts don't know what Americans think because none of them voted for Trump.https://www.foxnews.com/media/sara-haines-admits-view-co-hosts-dont-know-what-americans-think-because-no-one-voted-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(I'm not sure who is worse Hostin or Behar)...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:16, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:ooooww tuffie...Behar is incorrigible and Hostin is still in an apprenticeship. While Behar deserves a Lifetime Achievement Award for Idiotic Partisanship, for the longterm Hostin is probably more dangerous. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:40, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Sun Tzu]] said: &amp;quot;It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If the left and liberals continue to stay in their self-imposed ideological cacoons (See: [[Echo chamber (media)]]) and not understand why Americans voted for Trump in the past, they will continue to lose a great many elections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:58, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Fortunately their echo chamber has been shrinking in non legacy media which LED to our Nov 5. victory. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 14:04, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reports of empty stores, parking lots, and job sites==&lt;br /&gt;
out of fear of arrest and mass deportations. If true, there could or would also be a &amp;quot;protest vote&amp;quot; by legal citizens and workers, adding to the numbers. ''Developing''. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:43, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Location, State, city?[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:12, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://citizenwatchreport.com/empty-store-parking-lots-and-quiet-factories-social-media-reports-suggest-illegal-immigrants-staying-away-leaving-stores-and-job-sites-empty/ Here's some reports], but the claim is of others nationwide. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:20, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://resistthemainstream.com/americans-detect-eerie-detail-as-illegal-aliens-fear-trumps-crackdown/ Another report]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trump offers buyout of deadbeats on the federal payroll==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.axios.com/2025/01/28/trump-federal-workers-quit-severance] Probably would have a limited [[inflationary]] effect. But they should also be required to sign a waiver promising to never accept federal employment, or employment from a government contractor or grantee, under President Kamala Harris in 4 years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:27, January 28, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== '$50m. taxpayer dollars funding condoms in Gaza' frozen by Trump, White House says ???==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flammable objects being prepared to be flown toward Israel from Gaza .jpeg|thumb|File:Flammable objects being prepared to be flown toward Israel from Gaza]]&lt;br /&gt;
'$50m. taxpayer dollars funding condoms in Gaza' frozen by Trump, White House says.&lt;br /&gt;
Palestinian terrorists in Gaza began launching improvised explosive devices (IEDs), including condoms and balloons, into Israel’s South in 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
By Jerusalem Post Staff.&lt;br /&gt;
January 28, 2025&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-839707 JPost] Next the entire &amp;quot;pay for slay&amp;quot; needs be exposed [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 14:39, January 29, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I saw this. WTH? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:00, January 29, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Thank you Trump. The &amp;quot;Palestinians&amp;quot; might be innovative, but not for good. Many vital materials supplied as humanitarian aid, have been converted for terror use by that regime. For example - &amp;quot;How Hamas Turns Water Pipes Into Rockets&amp;quot; [https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=04NB27x138Y] And boasted about it: &amp;quot;Hamas boasted it could use EU-funded pipelines to attack Israel.&amp;quot;[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MvvqBcA-9yA].[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 15:19, January 29, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Yes, very [[innovative]], which seems to contradict a lot of hate screed [[Essays]] in [[Conservapedia]] that are linked to and have polluted Mainspace categories. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, January 29, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since we, the US have been funding UN... [https://elderofziyon.blogspot.com/2025/01/did-us-provide-hamas-with-condoms-that.html?m=1][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:15, January 31, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Freed hostage first message on plane: 'I have chosen the path of FAITH' (Psalm 119:30) and returned with FAITH==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.instagram.com/lizzysavetsky/reel/DFdLNY4xvuZ/ A lesson in choosing faith from Agam Berger].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/403158 Agam's message after release from Hamas captivity: 'I chose faith, returned with faith'].&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://x.com/persianjewess/status/1885020301076918763 &amp;quot;Explanation&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 21:55, January 30, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Truly inspiring. Heroic. Thanks D.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:11, January 31, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trump needs to pardon [[Snowden]] now==&lt;br /&gt;
*''[[Politico]]:'' [https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-nightly/2025/01/30/tulsi-gabbards-edward-snowden-problem-00201692 Tulsi Gabbard’s Edward Snowden problem].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[President Trump]] needs to [[pardon]] [[Edward Snowden]] immediately. This may neutralize and undo some of the damage and threats to her nomination that [[Democrat]]s, [[neocon]]s, and [[User:Conservative]] have placed in her way. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:39, January 30, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Deep State]] snake [[Mark Warner]] to Gabbard: &amp;quot;[https://youtu.be/VJ74uAm06ao How can you blame NATO for Putin's brutal invasion…]. Clearly [[Sen. Mark Warner]] and [[User:Conservative]] are on the same page, based upon hundreds of thousands of bytes and thousands of hours of editing over 3 years by User:Conservative, '''''against''''' [[Tulsi Gabbard]] and [[Donald Trump]]. Gabbard's nomination, and the ability of Trump to [[drain the swamp]], hinges on this question. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:19, January 30, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Third plane crash==&lt;br /&gt;
Alaska [[F-35]], Potomac [https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/PAT25 Priority Air Transport], and now [https://t.me/Slavyangrad/118503?single Philly Medivac]. [https://therightscoop.com/horrific-medical-jet-crashes-in-philly-sets-multiple-houses-on-fire-and-kills-all-six-onboard/] As Monkey Werx said, [https://youtu.be/srmUjRwua0w?t=622 &amp;quot;it always happens in threes&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;TFR&amp;quot; = temporary flight restriction)]. It was a big mistake when the US [[IC]] decided to attack [[Russian]] civilians inside Russia to convince the people their government can't protect them. [[Electronic warfare]] certainly is capable of causing all three of these incidents. [https://creativedestructionmedia.com/news/national/2025/01/31/another-suspicious-plane-crash-in-philadelphia-is-america-under-attack/] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:06, January 31, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:(Note: the same helicopter under the same call sign took off from the same location and  [https://www.flightaware.com/live/flight/PAT25/history/20250118/2245Z/KDAA/KDAA/tracklog executed the same unusual changes in altitude] in a training flight 11 days earlier).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Berletic]]: [https://rumble.com/v6eyxls-us-transfers-missiles-to-ukraine-end-war-responsibly-a-euphenism-for-contin.html US Transfers Missiles to Ukraine, &amp;quot;End War Responsibly&amp;quot; a Euphemism for Continuity of Agenda]. Would you expect the Russians not to respond, after all [[Trump]]'s promises to end the war in 24 hrs? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:36, January 31, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===What is electronic warfare and how is it possible?===&lt;br /&gt;
''What is [[electronic warfare]], and how is it possible to bring down a [[civilian]] or [[military]] aircraft?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The subject is vast, too vast to thumbnail here. But yes, it is possible for a lone [[saboteur]] with a package no bigger than a cigar box in line-of-sight of an aircraft to disrupt its electronic instruments and communications, to the point that the pilot doesn't know if he's flying upside down, even on [[America]]'s most sophisticated 5th generation fighter, the [[F-35]]. Some electronic controls may even be taken over by electronic warfare.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The universal consensus is, the [[Russians]] have the most advanced [[electronic warfare]] capabilities on the [[planet]]. And this only makes sense: while [[America]] has focused on &amp;quot;air superiority&amp;quot; since the 1940s, the [[Russian]]s prioritized &amp;quot;air defense&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As early as the [[1991 Gulf War]], Soviet technology that had been given to Saddam Hussein was used to disrupt signals and get American [[Patriot missile]]s to shoot down friendly [[British]] fighter aircraft. The [[technology]] has only been [[innovation|innovated]] and improved since then.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So if this is true - 3 airplane crashes in 3 days is retaliation for Russian oil facilities burning as we speak - [[Donald Trump]] has a decision to make: Make peace on Russia's terms or continue a [[New Cold War]] for the next 30-50 years that will instantly destroy America's commercial air passenger industry and hold private citizens hostage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Who's advice will Trump take? [[Milley]], [[Lloyd Austin]], Gen. Keane, Gen. Hodges? and continue [[demonizing]] the Russian President and the Russian people? or will he make peace for the next generation?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Message to [[User:Conservative]]: the exploding sewage pipeline in [[Moscow]] you are so proud of may actually be a form of [[electronic warfare]], getting the sewage lines over pressurized to explode (this was done as early as 1983 and even lately causing gas pipelines to explode. What goes around comes around). [[Obama]] signed the secret authorization for [[covert operation]]s and [[sabotage]]  inside Russian territory, and I've never heard anything about [[Trump]] rescinding it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:15, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And the idea that America can defeat Russia on the conventional battlefield now is absurd and insane, or even stall until such a time as we can martial the manpower and resources to do so is ludicrous. Trump must decide now, today (if not yesterday) if he wants more Cold War or not, demonizing and ridiculing Russians and more wasteful defense spending on useless, expensive [[weapon]]s that do not work when you need them &amp;quot;for the foreseeable future&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:37, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kursk invasion and New Jersy drones===&lt;br /&gt;
At the moment, [[electronic warfare]] is all the rage. The [[drone]] sightings over New Jersey, Langley, Lakenheath, and Germany were all part of an American program to improve [[America]]'s electronic warfare capabilities. On the first day of the [[NATO invasion of Kursk]] this past November, the armored vehicles combat tested a new version of America's electronic warfare that successfully warded off all Russian kamikaze [[drone]]s (this explains NATO/Ukraine's successful advances the first day). By the second day, the Russians switched to fiber optic drones (drones on a long, thin [[fiber optic]] cable which are not controlled by [[radio]] signals) again, successfully circumventing [[Western]] electronic warfare. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:12, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Israeli electronic warfare===&lt;br /&gt;
:Two examples of [[Israel]]i [[electronic warfare]] and an explanation of how [[Russian]] electronic warfare can destroy the commercial passenger airline industry:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*A few years ago the Israelis were able to trick an [[Iran]]ian [[nuclear]] physicist to plug a flash drive into a computer [[USB]] port connected to the Iranian nuclear program, causing the entire Iranian nuclear program to go haywire. The Iranians learned an important lesson: if they wanted their own nuclear program, they would have to build their own secure [[microchip]] production factory and not rely on purchasing microchips from abroad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*The exploding [[Hezbollah]] pagers. It remains to be seen if Hezbollah learned the same lesson the Iranians did from the flash drive incident.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''How could or will [[Russian]] [[electronic warfare]] destroy the global commercial passenger airline industry?''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When the public becomes aware of the nature of modern [[electronic warfare]], that a commercial passenger plane can be destroyed anywhere at any time as retaliation for the activities of their government, they will refuse to ever fly again. Now, you can argue that, in time, American [[innovation]] can develop countermeasures against it. Perhaps. But by that time [[American Airlines]] and others will have long been in [[bankruptcy]] and will have been liquidated. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:44, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Grant Stinchfield/Gatewaypundit article===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/urgent-call-return-base-choppers-strange-movements-make/ The Urgent Call to “Return to Base” &amp;amp; The Chopper’s Strange Movements Make No Sense (VIDEO)], by Grant Stinchfield Jan. 30, 2025 &lt;br /&gt;
Stinchfield lists these possible causes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mechanical Failure&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Air Traffic Control Failure&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human Error&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nefarious Action&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pilot Suicide&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Computer Hack&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For &amp;quot;Nefarious Action&amp;quot;, substitute &amp;quot;[[Electronic Warfare]]&amp;quot;, and to a certain extent &amp;quot;Computer Hack&amp;quot; cause electronic warfare encompasses those capabilities, as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Illarionov==&lt;br /&gt;
The two &amp;quot;big boys&amp;quot; are playing a psychological game: who will call who first? Will [[Trump]] call Putin? or will [[Putin]] call Trump? [https://glenhoward.substack.com/p/trump-putin-20-and-the-future-of]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whoever calls who first is throwing in the towel. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:51, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Potomac airliner-helicopter crash==&lt;br /&gt;
I apologize for reverting an edit that mentioned &amp;quot;return to base&amp;quot; - sorry if I was hasty, but it looked like an error. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:56, February 1, 2025 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:American_westward_expansion&amp;diff=2097135</id>
		<title>Category:American westward expansion</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Category:American_westward_expansion&amp;diff=2097135"/>
		<updated>2025-01-04T15:42:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Gradual then sudden&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;America territory gradually expanded from thirteen colonies on the eastern seaboard, westward to the Mississippi. Then the Louisiana Purchase doubled our territory in one fell swoop.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Louisiana_Purchase&amp;diff=2097134</id>
		<title>Louisiana Purchase</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Louisiana_Purchase&amp;diff=2097134"/>
		<updated>2025-01-04T15:40:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Category: American westward expansion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Louisiana Purchase''' of 1803 was the transfer of the western half of the Mississippi Valley from Spain and France to the United States. It encompassed 900,000 square miles of fertile lands, inhabited by Indian tribes, a few thousand French settlers and a rapidly growing population of American frontiersmen. It represented the single most important territorial acquisition by the United States during its transcontinental development. It was negotiated by [[Robert R. Livingston]] and purchased by President [[Thomas Jefferson]], who stretched the Constitution to do so. [[Napoleon]], the ruler of France was eager to sell it for $15,000,000; Spain had no choice in the matter. The Purchase contained most of what is now the west central section of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1762, the French province of Louisiana included the Ohio and Mississippi valleys and the shore line of the Gulf of Mexico both east and west of the Mississippi. France lost it after the [[French and Indian War]] (Seven Years' War) in 1763. The peace treaty gave Spain New Orleans and all the lands west of the Mississippi; the British took the lands east of the Mississippi.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 1763 the British also took control of Florida from Spain; in 1783 the British returned East Florida and West Florida to Spain.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1800 [[Napoleon]],  with dreams of a new French Empire in the Caribbean, sensed the strategic importance of Louisiana and decided to take it from Spain.  By the Treaty of San Ildefonso, Oct. 1, 1800, and the Convention of Aranjuez, Mar. 21, 1801, Napoleon acquired Louisiana for France in return for placing the son-in-law of the Spanish king on the newly erected throne of Etruria. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American fears==&lt;br /&gt;
Rumors of this secret retrocession from Spain to France reached the United States, causing apprehension of possible encirclement. President Jefferson said that America was faced with the prospect of &amp;quot;marrying the British fleet and nation&amp;quot; (that is, becoming an ally of Britain in the large-scale wars underway between Britain and France) as an offset to this new French empire in the heart of the continent.  [[Robert R. Livingston]] and special envoy [[James Monroe]] in Paris plied the French with arguments for a deal with the United States as they strove to buy just the coastal areas of New Orleans and West Florida. In the final decision to sell the whole province of Louisiana to the Americans, Napoleon was influenced by the imminent renewal of war with Britain, when Louisiana might be lost anyway, and the consequent need for money as well as by the failure of his Haitian campaign, where his invasion army had been destroyed by disease. Napoleon's chief goal was to strengthen the United States as a counter-weight to Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Treaty==&lt;br /&gt;
Exceeding their instructions, the American envoys accepted Napoleon's offer. By a treaty and two conventions, all dated April 30, 1803, the United States paid $11.25 million for Louisiana, set aside $3.75 million to pay the claims of its own citizens against France, and placed France and Spain on an equal commercial basis with the United States in the colony for a period of twelve years.  To finance the sale the U.S. delivered Treasury bonds to France, which it immediately resold to British bankers for gold. On November 30, 1803, Spain formally delivered the colony to the French colonial prefect, who on December 20, 1803, officially transferred the territory to the American commissioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics==&lt;br /&gt;
It was important to the growing United States that Americans could gain access to the vast interior of North America via the Mississippi River and the port of [[New Orleans]].  The nation recognized the bargain, but some Republicans complained that the Constitution did not allow such a purchase, and many Federalists were alarmed that eventually the western population would overwhelm their stronghold in the Northeast. Congress voted approval and voted the funds. The acquisition provoked several reversals of policy as [[Federalist Party|Federalists]] and [[Jeffersonian Republicans]] competed for electoral preeminence. Federalists had long ignored or disparaged the Western frontier, but they soon saw that their future depended on expanding their electoral strength beyond the Northeast. Their support for access to the Mississippi River and the acquisition of New Orleans and other territories largely rested on their need to remain competitive with their Republican rivals. Republicans, on the other hand, sensed their growing strength in the South and West and relaxed their narrower reading of the Constitution to argue for the purchase, even though it would increase the power of the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
The region was poorly mapped. All that the Republic could be certain of in 1803, however, was that it had acquired a corridor down the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico, the width of which was uncertain.  The great exploring expedition of [[Lewis and Clark]] revealed the extent and riches of the vast territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later treaties by [[John Quincy Adams]] in 1818 and 1819, with Britain and Spain set the boundaries. The Treaty of 1818 placed the nation's northern boundary (with present-day [[Canada]]) along the forty-ninth parallel from the Lake of the Woods to the Rocky Mountains and excluded the British altogether from the Mississippi Valley. The right to this valley and its great tributaries in the West, including the Spanish claim to Oregon, was won in the Treaty of 1819 by drawing the western boundary up the Sabine, Red, and Arkansas rivers to the Rocky Mountains and then westward along the 42nd parallel to the Pacific.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The acquisition of this enormous tract laid a large part of the material foundation for the future greatness of the United States. More immediately, however, its possession ensured the right of free navigation of the Mississippi and the control of the port of New Orleans, vital to western trade, as an integral part of American territory. Moreover, it reinforced the security of the new republic by eliminating France in the contest for supremacy in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Oregon Trail]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lewis and Clark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: American westward expansion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Adams, Henry. ''History of the United States of America During the Administrations of Thomas Jefferson'' (2 vol 1889; 1986 Library of America edition).&lt;br /&gt;
*  Ambrose, Stephen E. ''Undaunted Courage: Meriwether Lewis, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening of the American West'' (1996) on the Lewis &amp;amp; Clark Expedition; [https://www.amazon.com/Undaunted-Courage-Meriwether-Jefferson-Expedition/dp/0684811073/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194568067&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Cerami, Charles A. ''Jefferson's Great Gamble: The Remarkable Story of Jefferson, Napoleon and the Men Behind the Louisiana Purchase'' (2004), 272pp. popular history [https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1402202407/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kastor, Peter J. ''The Great Acquisition: An Introduction to the Louisiana Purchase'' (2004), 184pp; [https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1883844053/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and text search]   &lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, Roger G. ''Mr. Jefferson's Lost Cause: Land, Farmers, Slavery, and the Louisiana Purchase'' (2003) [http://www.questia.com/read/103189018# online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Kukla, Jon. ''A Wilderness So Immense: The Louisiana Purchase and the Destiny of America'' (2004) [https://www.amazon.com/Wilderness-So-Immense-Louisiana-Purchase/dp/0375707611/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194569212&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
*  Levinson, Sanford and Sparrow, Bartholomew H., eds, ''The Louisiana Purchase and American Expansion, 1803-1898.'' (2005) 262 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Lyon, E. Wilson ''Louisiana in French Diplomacy, 1759-1804'' (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* Malone, Dumas. ''Jefferson the President: First Term, 1801-1805.'' (1960)&lt;br /&gt;
* Peterson, Merrill D. ''Thomas Jefferson and the New Nation: A Biography'' (1986), long, detailed biography; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=82266123 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Smelser, Marshall. ''The Democratic Republic: 1801-1815'' (1968) &lt;br /&gt;
* Theriault, Sean M. &amp;quot;Party Politics During the Louisiana Purchase.&amp;quot; ''Social Science History'' (2006) 30(2): 293-324. Issn: 0145-5532 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tucker, Robert W.  and David C. Hendrickson. ''Empire of Liberty: The Statecraft of Thomas Jefferson'' (1992) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Notes====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Early National U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Western United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Explorers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Louisiana_Purchase&amp;diff=2097133</id>
		<title>Louisiana Purchase</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Louisiana_Purchase&amp;diff=2097133"/>
		<updated>2025-01-04T15:39:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Category: Westward expansion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Louisiana Purchase''' of 1803 was the transfer of the western half of the Mississippi Valley from Spain and France to the United States. It encompassed 900,000 square miles of fertile lands, inhabited by Indian tribes, a few thousand French settlers and a rapidly growing population of American frontiersmen. It represented the single most important territorial acquisition by the United States during its transcontinental development. It was negotiated by [[Robert R. Livingston]] and purchased by President [[Thomas Jefferson]], who stretched the Constitution to do so. [[Napoleon]], the ruler of France was eager to sell it for $15,000,000; Spain had no choice in the matter. The Purchase contained most of what is now the west central section of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1762, the French province of Louisiana included the Ohio and Mississippi valleys and the shore line of the Gulf of Mexico both east and west of the Mississippi. France lost it after the [[French and Indian War]] (Seven Years' War) in 1763. The peace treaty gave Spain New Orleans and all the lands west of the Mississippi; the British took the lands east of the Mississippi.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 1763 the British also took control of Florida from Spain; in 1783 the British returned East Florida and West Florida to Spain.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1800 [[Napoleon]],  with dreams of a new French Empire in the Caribbean, sensed the strategic importance of Louisiana and decided to take it from Spain.  By the Treaty of San Ildefonso, Oct. 1, 1800, and the Convention of Aranjuez, Mar. 21, 1801, Napoleon acquired Louisiana for France in return for placing the son-in-law of the Spanish king on the newly erected throne of Etruria. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American fears==&lt;br /&gt;
Rumors of this secret retrocession from Spain to France reached the United States, causing apprehension of possible encirclement. President Jefferson said that America was faced with the prospect of &amp;quot;marrying the British fleet and nation&amp;quot; (that is, becoming an ally of Britain in the large-scale wars underway between Britain and France) as an offset to this new French empire in the heart of the continent.  [[Robert R. Livingston]] and special envoy [[James Monroe]] in Paris plied the French with arguments for a deal with the United States as they strove to buy just the coastal areas of New Orleans and West Florida. In the final decision to sell the whole province of Louisiana to the Americans, Napoleon was influenced by the imminent renewal of war with Britain, when Louisiana might be lost anyway, and the consequent need for money as well as by the failure of his Haitian campaign, where his invasion army had been destroyed by disease. Napoleon's chief goal was to strengthen the United States as a counter-weight to Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Treaty==&lt;br /&gt;
Exceeding their instructions, the American envoys accepted Napoleon's offer. By a treaty and two conventions, all dated April 30, 1803, the United States paid $11.25 million for Louisiana, set aside $3.75 million to pay the claims of its own citizens against France, and placed France and Spain on an equal commercial basis with the United States in the colony for a period of twelve years.  To finance the sale the U.S. delivered Treasury bonds to France, which it immediately resold to British bankers for gold. On November 30, 1803, Spain formally delivered the colony to the French colonial prefect, who on December 20, 1803, officially transferred the territory to the American commissioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics==&lt;br /&gt;
It was important to the growing United States that Americans could gain access to the vast interior of North America via the Mississippi River and the port of [[New Orleans]].  The nation recognized the bargain, but some Republicans complained that the Constitution did not allow such a purchase, and many Federalists were alarmed that eventually the western population would overwhelm their stronghold in the Northeast. Congress voted approval and voted the funds. The acquisition provoked several reversals of policy as [[Federalist Party|Federalists]] and [[Jeffersonian Republicans]] competed for electoral preeminence. Federalists had long ignored or disparaged the Western frontier, but they soon saw that their future depended on expanding their electoral strength beyond the Northeast. Their support for access to the Mississippi River and the acquisition of New Orleans and other territories largely rested on their need to remain competitive with their Republican rivals. Republicans, on the other hand, sensed their growing strength in the South and West and relaxed their narrower reading of the Constitution to argue for the purchase, even though it would increase the power of the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
The region was poorly mapped. All that the Republic could be certain of in 1803, however, was that it had acquired a corridor down the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico, the width of which was uncertain.  The great exploring expedition of [[Lewis and Clark]] revealed the extent and riches of the vast territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later treaties by [[John Quincy Adams]] in 1818 and 1819, with Britain and Spain set the boundaries. The Treaty of 1818 placed the nation's northern boundary (with present-day [[Canada]]) along the forty-ninth parallel from the Lake of the Woods to the Rocky Mountains and excluded the British altogether from the Mississippi Valley. The right to this valley and its great tributaries in the West, including the Spanish claim to Oregon, was won in the Treaty of 1819 by drawing the western boundary up the Sabine, Red, and Arkansas rivers to the Rocky Mountains and then westward along the 42nd parallel to the Pacific.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The acquisition of this enormous tract laid a large part of the material foundation for the future greatness of the United States. More immediately, however, its possession ensured the right of free navigation of the Mississippi and the control of the port of New Orleans, vital to western trade, as an integral part of American territory. Moreover, it reinforced the security of the new republic by eliminating France in the contest for supremacy in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Oregon Trail]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lewis and Clark]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: Westward expansion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Adams, Henry. ''History of the United States of America During the Administrations of Thomas Jefferson'' (2 vol 1889; 1986 Library of America edition).&lt;br /&gt;
*  Ambrose, Stephen E. ''Undaunted Courage: Meriwether Lewis, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening of the American West'' (1996) on the Lewis &amp;amp; Clark Expedition; [https://www.amazon.com/Undaunted-Courage-Meriwether-Jefferson-Expedition/dp/0684811073/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194568067&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Cerami, Charles A. ''Jefferson's Great Gamble: The Remarkable Story of Jefferson, Napoleon and the Men Behind the Louisiana Purchase'' (2004), 272pp. popular history [https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1402202407/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kastor, Peter J. ''The Great Acquisition: An Introduction to the Louisiana Purchase'' (2004), 184pp; [https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1883844053/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and text search]   &lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, Roger G. ''Mr. Jefferson's Lost Cause: Land, Farmers, Slavery, and the Louisiana Purchase'' (2003) [http://www.questia.com/read/103189018# online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Kukla, Jon. ''A Wilderness So Immense: The Louisiana Purchase and the Destiny of America'' (2004) [https://www.amazon.com/Wilderness-So-Immense-Louisiana-Purchase/dp/0375707611/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194569212&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
*  Levinson, Sanford and Sparrow, Bartholomew H., eds, ''The Louisiana Purchase and American Expansion, 1803-1898.'' (2005) 262 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Lyon, E. Wilson ''Louisiana in French Diplomacy, 1759-1804'' (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* Malone, Dumas. ''Jefferson the President: First Term, 1801-1805.'' (1960)&lt;br /&gt;
* Peterson, Merrill D. ''Thomas Jefferson and the New Nation: A Biography'' (1986), long, detailed biography; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=82266123 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Smelser, Marshall. ''The Democratic Republic: 1801-1815'' (1968) &lt;br /&gt;
* Theriault, Sean M. &amp;quot;Party Politics During the Louisiana Purchase.&amp;quot; ''Social Science History'' (2006) 30(2): 293-324. Issn: 0145-5532 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tucker, Robert W.  and David C. Hendrickson. ''Empire of Liberty: The Statecraft of Thomas Jefferson'' (1992) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Notes====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Early National U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Western United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Explorers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lewis_and_Clark&amp;diff=2097132</id>
		<title>Lewis and Clark</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lewis_and_Clark&amp;diff=2097132"/>
		<updated>2025-01-04T15:37:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: westward expansion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;At the behest of President [[Thomas Jefferson]], Captain [[Meriwether Lewis]] and Lieutenant [[William Clark]] set out on May 14, 1804 with three boats to explore the western land acquired in the [[Louisiana Purchase]].  Lewis and Clark traveled up the [[Missouri]] river from [[St. Louis]], across the Rocky Mountains, and down the Columbia River to the [[Pacific Ocean]], having to carry their boats on land in spots where the river was too treacherous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They were guided in their travels by a [[Native American]] woman named [[Sacajawea]], who not only shared their privations but was pregnant and gave birth to a son while on the journey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lewis and Clark returned to Sept. 23, 1806, and received a hero's welcome.  They brought back much information in the form of diaries, maps and plant samples.  Only one man out of the party of 40 died during the trip, which is extraordinary considering how they endured some hostile Indians, wild animals, and lack of food.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both were rewarded with large plots of land.  Lewis later served as governor of the Louisiana Territory, and Clark governed the Missouri Territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among the scholars of Lewis and Clark was the [[Louisiana State University]] historian [[John L. Loos]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Nb_explorers}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category: American westward expansion]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Louisiana_Purchase&amp;diff=2097131</id>
		<title>Louisiana Purchase</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Louisiana_Purchase&amp;diff=2097131"/>
		<updated>2025-01-04T15:33:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: See also&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Louisiana Purchase''' of 1803 was the transfer of the western half of the Mississippi Valley from Spain and France to the United States. It encompassed 900,000 square miles of fertile lands, inhabited by Indian tribes, a few thousand French settlers and a rapidly growing population of American frontiersmen. It represented the single most important territorial acquisition by the United States during its transcontinental development. It was negotiated by [[Robert R. Livingston]] and purchased by President [[Thomas Jefferson]], who stretched the Constitution to do so. [[Napoleon]], the ruler of France was eager to sell it for $15,000,000; Spain had no choice in the matter. The Purchase contained most of what is now the west central section of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1762, the French province of Louisiana included the Ohio and Mississippi valleys and the shore line of the Gulf of Mexico both east and west of the Mississippi. France lost it after the [[French and Indian War]] (Seven Years' War) in 1763. The peace treaty gave Spain New Orleans and all the lands west of the Mississippi; the British took the lands east of the Mississippi.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 1763 the British also took control of Florida from Spain; in 1783 the British returned East Florida and West Florida to Spain.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1800 [[Napoleon]],  with dreams of a new French Empire in the Caribbean, sensed the strategic importance of Louisiana and decided to take it from Spain.  By the Treaty of San Ildefonso, Oct. 1, 1800, and the Convention of Aranjuez, Mar. 21, 1801, Napoleon acquired Louisiana for France in return for placing the son-in-law of the Spanish king on the newly erected throne of Etruria. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==American fears==&lt;br /&gt;
Rumors of this secret retrocession from Spain to France reached the United States, causing apprehension of possible encirclement. President Jefferson said that America was faced with the prospect of &amp;quot;marrying the British fleet and nation&amp;quot; (that is, becoming an ally of Britain in the large-scale wars underway between Britain and France) as an offset to this new French empire in the heart of the continent.  [[Robert R. Livingston]] and special envoy [[James Monroe]] in Paris plied the French with arguments for a deal with the United States as they strove to buy just the coastal areas of New Orleans and West Florida. In the final decision to sell the whole province of Louisiana to the Americans, Napoleon was influenced by the imminent renewal of war with Britain, when Louisiana might be lost anyway, and the consequent need for money as well as by the failure of his Haitian campaign, where his invasion army had been destroyed by disease. Napoleon's chief goal was to strengthen the United States as a counter-weight to Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Treaty==&lt;br /&gt;
Exceeding their instructions, the American envoys accepted Napoleon's offer. By a treaty and two conventions, all dated April 30, 1803, the United States paid $11.25 million for Louisiana, set aside $3.75 million to pay the claims of its own citizens against France, and placed France and Spain on an equal commercial basis with the United States in the colony for a period of twelve years.  To finance the sale the U.S. delivered Treasury bonds to France, which it immediately resold to British bankers for gold. On November 30, 1803, Spain formally delivered the colony to the French colonial prefect, who on December 20, 1803, officially transferred the territory to the American commissioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics==&lt;br /&gt;
It was important to the growing United States that Americans could gain access to the vast interior of North America via the Mississippi River and the port of [[New Orleans]].  The nation recognized the bargain, but some Republicans complained that the Constitution did not allow such a purchase, and many Federalists were alarmed that eventually the western population would overwhelm their stronghold in the Northeast. Congress voted approval and voted the funds. The acquisition provoked several reversals of policy as [[Federalist Party|Federalists]] and [[Jeffersonian Republicans]] competed for electoral preeminence. Federalists had long ignored or disparaged the Western frontier, but they soon saw that their future depended on expanding their electoral strength beyond the Northeast. Their support for access to the Mississippi River and the acquisition of New Orleans and other territories largely rested on their need to remain competitive with their Republican rivals. Republicans, on the other hand, sensed their growing strength in the South and West and relaxed their narrower reading of the Constitution to argue for the purchase, even though it would increase the power of the government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Geography==&lt;br /&gt;
The region was poorly mapped. All that the Republic could be certain of in 1803, however, was that it had acquired a corridor down the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico, the width of which was uncertain.  The great exploring expedition of [[Lewis and Clark]] revealed the extent and riches of the vast territory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later treaties by [[John Quincy Adams]] in 1818 and 1819, with Britain and Spain set the boundaries. The Treaty of 1818 placed the nation's northern boundary (with present-day [[Canada]]) along the forty-ninth parallel from the Lake of the Woods to the Rocky Mountains and excluded the British altogether from the Mississippi Valley. The right to this valley and its great tributaries in the West, including the Spanish claim to Oregon, was won in the Treaty of 1819 by drawing the western boundary up the Sabine, Red, and Arkansas rivers to the Rocky Mountains and then westward along the 42nd parallel to the Pacific.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The acquisition of this enormous tract laid a large part of the material foundation for the future greatness of the United States. More immediately, however, its possession ensured the right of free navigation of the Mississippi and the control of the port of New Orleans, vital to western trade, as an integral part of American territory. Moreover, it reinforced the security of the new republic by eliminating France in the contest for supremacy in North America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Westward expansion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Oregon Trail]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lewis and Clark]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Adams, Henry. ''History of the United States of America During the Administrations of Thomas Jefferson'' (2 vol 1889; 1986 Library of America edition).&lt;br /&gt;
*  Ambrose, Stephen E. ''Undaunted Courage: Meriwether Lewis, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening of the American West'' (1996) on the Lewis &amp;amp; Clark Expedition; [https://www.amazon.com/Undaunted-Courage-Meriwether-Jefferson-Expedition/dp/0684811073/ref=sr_1_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194568067&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
* Cerami, Charles A. ''Jefferson's Great Gamble: The Remarkable Story of Jefferson, Napoleon and the Men Behind the Louisiana Purchase'' (2004), 272pp. popular history [https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1402202407/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kastor, Peter J. ''The Great Acquisition: An Introduction to the Louisiana Purchase'' (2004), 184pp; [https://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1883844053/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-4827826-5463040#reader-link excerpt and text search]   &lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, Roger G. ''Mr. Jefferson's Lost Cause: Land, Farmers, Slavery, and the Louisiana Purchase'' (2003) [http://www.questia.com/read/103189018# online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
* Kukla, Jon. ''A Wilderness So Immense: The Louisiana Purchase and the Destiny of America'' (2004) [https://www.amazon.com/Wilderness-So-Immense-Louisiana-Purchase/dp/0375707611/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/103-4827826-5463040?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1194569212&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
*  Levinson, Sanford and Sparrow, Bartholomew H., eds, ''The Louisiana Purchase and American Expansion, 1803-1898.'' (2005) 262 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Lyon, E. Wilson ''Louisiana in French Diplomacy, 1759-1804'' (1934)&lt;br /&gt;
* Malone, Dumas. ''Jefferson the President: First Term, 1801-1805.'' (1960)&lt;br /&gt;
* Peterson, Merrill D. ''Thomas Jefferson and the New Nation: A Biography'' (1986), long, detailed biography; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=82266123 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Smelser, Marshall. ''The Democratic Republic: 1801-1815'' (1968) &lt;br /&gt;
* Theriault, Sean M. &amp;quot;Party Politics During the Louisiana Purchase.&amp;quot; ''Social Science History'' (2006) 30(2): 293-324. Issn: 0145-5532 Fulltext: [[Ebsco]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Tucker, Robert W.  and David C. Hendrickson. ''Empire of Liberty: The Statecraft of Thomas Jefferson'' (1992) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Notes====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Early National U.S.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Western United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Explorers]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sylvester_Stallone&amp;diff=2097122</id>
		<title>Sylvester Stallone</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sylvester_Stallone&amp;diff=2097122"/>
		<updated>2025-01-04T14:50:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: 6 + 5 &amp;gt; 9&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Sylvester Stallone''' (born July 6, 1946) is an American actor, screenwriter and movie director best known for his six ''[[Rocky]]'' and five ''[[Rambo]]'' films.&lt;br /&gt;
In &amp;quot;Tulsa King&amp;quot;, Stallone has come full circle from portraying an enforcer for a loan shark, to becoming a mob boss himself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sylvester Stallone is a [[Republican Party|Republican]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/40-celebrities-who-are-republicans#37a5pyw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Anthony Robbins]] wrote: &lt;br /&gt;
:{{overcoming}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000230/ IMDB website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Stallone, Sylvester}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Actors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Italian-Americans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christians]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sylvester_Stallone&amp;diff=2097121</id>
		<title>Sylvester Stallone</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sylvester_Stallone&amp;diff=2097121"/>
		<updated>2025-01-04T14:47:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: from loan shark enforcer to mob boss&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Sylvester Stallone''' (born July 6, 1946) is an American actor, screenwriter and movie director best known for his ''[[Rocky]]'' and ''[[Rambo]]'' films, which between them have encompassed at least nine films.&lt;br /&gt;
In &amp;quot;Tulsa King&amp;quot;, Stallone has come full circle from portraying an enforcer for a loan shark, to becoming a mob boss himself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sylvester Stallone is a [[Republican Party|Republican]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/40-celebrities-who-are-republicans#37a5pyw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Anthony Robbins]] wrote: &lt;br /&gt;
:{{overcoming}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000230/ IMDB website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Stallone, Sylvester}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Actors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Italian-Americans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christians]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sylvester_Stallone&amp;diff=2097120</id>
		<title>Sylvester Stallone</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sylvester_Stallone&amp;diff=2097120"/>
		<updated>2025-01-04T14:45:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Move down A. Robbins quote&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Sylvester Stallone''' (born July 6, 1946) is an American actor, screenwriter and movie director best known for his ''[[Rocky]]'' and ''[[Rambo]]'' films, which between them have encompassed at least nine films.&lt;br /&gt;
Sylvester Stallone is a [[Republican Party|Republican]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/40-celebrities-who-are-republicans#37a5pyw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Anthony Robbins]] wrote: &lt;br /&gt;
:{{overcoming}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000230/ IMDB website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Stallone, Sylvester}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Actors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Italian-Americans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christians]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sylvester_Stallone&amp;diff=2097116</id>
		<title>Sylvester Stallone</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Sylvester_Stallone&amp;diff=2097116"/>
		<updated>2025-01-04T14:43:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: &amp;quot;soon&amp;quot; is not encyclopedic&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Sylvester Stallone''' (born July 6, 1946) is an American actor, screenwriter and movie director best known for his ''[[Rocky]]'' and ''[[Rambo]]'' films, which between them have encompassed at least nine films.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Anthony Robbins]] wrote: &lt;br /&gt;
:{{overcoming}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sylvester Stallone is a [[Republican Party|Republican]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/40-celebrities-who-are-republicans#37a5pyw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000230/ IMDB website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Stallone, Sylvester}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Actors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Italian-Americans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christians]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&amp;diff=2089842</id>
		<title>User talk:RobSmith</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:RobSmith&amp;diff=2089842"/>
		<updated>2024-12-02T19:54:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: /* So flattering, yo! */ new section&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Template:RobSmith/adminresources}}&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 2]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 3]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 4]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 5]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 6]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 7]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 8]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 9]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 10]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 11]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 12]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 13]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 14]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 15]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User talk:RobSmith/Archive 16]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Conservapedia has a rule that a person's talk page is their castle. Don't you have better things to do than mess around with someone's user page castle? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia has a rule that a person's talk page is their castle. Don't you have more important things to do than mess around with someone's user page castle? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Focus on something more productive. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:49, August 29, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You are not free to engage in spam, trolling, or targeted harassment of other editors and Admin on the wiki or in email.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:All your spamming belongs on your user talk page, and not in a redirect to another page. And you are not allowed to engage in ridicule or denigration of other editors on your user talk page, either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You have been a persistent violator of [[Conservapedia]]'s basic civility rules for more than a decade. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:13, August 29, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Cease your [[trolling]]. You are responsible for disruption of [[Conservapedia]]'s war &amp;amp; election reporting. Andy has promised a preliminary ruling by the weekend. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As to &amp;quot;something more productive&amp;quot;, your massive disruption causing me to cease editing on the [[Trump-Russia]] and [[Biden-Ukraine]] series (an 8 year project), you left me time to focus on your harassment and the damage you have done to [[Conservapedia]].  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:36, August 29, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;sanctions don't work and are completely ineffective&amp;quot; ''Really?'' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If boycotts are [https://www.nytimes.com/1933/04/28/archives/frown-on-parades-as-hitler-protest-jewish-committee-and-bnai-brith.html &amp;quot;futile,&amp;quot;] then please explain to me, jenius, why the ADL is [https://www.adl.org/resources/news/5-ways-adl-combatting-bds so worried about BDS?] —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 23:37, August 31, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Sanctions against Germany &amp;amp; Japan only led to (or delayed) war. Same as Iraq. Sanctions against Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran remain to be seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Basically, politicians issue sanctions when they lack the political support from the public for all out war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As to the [[ADL]], I don't know; ask them. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:42, August 31, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If you studied history, you would've known that the 1933 anti-Nazi boycott didn't go through all the way because [https://www.palestine#remembered#om/FactsAboutHaavara.html#HowEuropeanJewsPerceivedZionists the Zo nazis saved the Nazis] when Haavara facilitated an exportation of Nazi products to Palestine. Had the Zionist socialists not saved the Nazi socialists' skin in their backstabbing perfidy against German Jewry, the Holocaust might've been averted to some significant extent. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 23:48, August 31, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::coulda woulda shoulda. All I know is sanctions on Germany didn't prevent the Sudeten crisis or Molotov-Ribbentrop pact or Japan from attacking Pearl Harbor (see [[Operation Snow]]). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:52, August 31, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Well yeah, sanctions wouldn't have prevented Jesuit-controlled Bolshevik Stalinists from coming to the rescue of Jesuit-controlled Nazis. The Communazi Pact was merely an expansion of the 1932 precedent set in the [[Berlin transport strike]]. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 23:57, August 31, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Here's where I think you're misreading the issue: You evidently think sanctions are an end in itself, like Cuban sanctions, that are used to [[blackmail]] a country to comply with another country's will. History has shown they don't work, and are only employed when the political leaders imposing sanctions lack the political consensus among their domestic constituencies for all-out war. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:00, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Didn't boycotts work against South African apartheid? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 00:04, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::In the long run, no. It was the [[Fall of the Wall]] and collapse of the Soviet Union that ended Apartheid, not boycotts or sanctions. South Africa was just one more [[Cold War]] conflict zone. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:08, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::For example: When the [[Soviet-Afghan war]] broke out, sanctions were imposed against the USSR for the purchase of chromium. Western support of the South African apartheid regime was used as an excuse to purchase chromium exports from the South African apartheid regime cause it was engaged in a [[national liberation movement]] struggle against the Soviet-supported [[SWAPO]]. &amp;quot;Screw democracy&amp;quot;, [[NATO]] essentially said. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:20, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::(ec)When political leaders start talking about sanctions, it should be an eyeopener. It means that ''they'' want [[war]] NOW, but know the public won't go along. So they kick the can down the road, hoping it will provoke the target enough or buy time to build a public consensus for war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::To wit: [[John McCain]] and the [[Magnitsky Act]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:08, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Here is the Nazi-fetish-LT KKK words salad anglo-mason cabaIistic nazi judo nazi cristo-nazi occultic hindu. We al knew his &amp;quot;sources&amp;quot; including pro Hitler's mufti Palestine.r. most ridiculous childish site [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:59, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Well, As soon as I saw how &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;LT was so upset in June that zionists saved 60 thousand Jews that he had to rewrite facts&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;. His quotations and style were all based on that &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;P.R. garbage site, which is  &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; [https://www.danielpipes.org/comments/288065 neo nazi-palestine Issa Nakhleh] linked,&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; though much has been written by teenagers - at least &amp;quot;intellectually&amp;quot; if any&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;he died in 2003 but the sh#t continues.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; Then there is the supremacy pro-Larouche holocaust denial page which LT copied other stinky &amp;quot;stuff&amp;quot;.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 05:36, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I can't access / through Edge, Yandex, or Opera. So I'll just have to take Pipes word for what it says. Pipes has a pretty solid reputation. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:53, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::More on Issa Nakhleh [https://books.google.com/books?id=wk0oAQAAMAAJ&amp;amp;newbks=1&amp;amp;newbks_redir=0&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;dq=issa+nakhleh+hitler&amp;amp;q=issa+nakhleh+hitler&amp;amp;hl=hu&amp;amp;source=gb_mobile_entity&amp;amp;redir_esc=y#issa%20nakhleh%20hitler this is him typical] in 1972 while Holocaust survivors were still &amp;quot;fresh&amp;quot;. He worked with supremacist and neo nazis throughout. LT also knows that Dianne had family relatives from previous generation who perished in the Holocaust.  So he is not just a liar but also sadistic. He takes pleasure in his sick rewriting marathon like Nakhleh or that old Arab in 2002: [https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2022/10/30/2132397/-Contradictory-Hate Paging Dr. Mengele, paging Hafar, paging Hafar to barrack 10..&amp;quot;].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 06:48, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::Telling, I did not know until you mentioned just now that Dianne had family who perished in the Holocaust. In any case, it only makes his/her/idiot's Nazi propaganda all the more morally incriminating. Chickens aren't oblivious enough to curry favor for KFC, yet their names are dragged through the mud by modern human idiots (&amp;quot;chickens&amp;quot;) who betray their own. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 11:42, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::RobSmith, the reason you can't access that link is because Dianne ran a Nazi-style censorship and altered the URL by replacing the period with a hash; [https://www.palestine#remembered#com/FactsAboutHaavara.html#HowEuropeanJewsPerceivedZionists here] it is. And '''[[Special:Diff/2074449|here]]''' is the revision link proving that Dianne messed with the URL link for censorship purposes. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 11:40, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Telling, the JA/WZO clearly only saved the anti-assimilationist fringe minority who were by and large rejects from German Jewry. Zionism back then was considered a fringe fifth column in the Jewish community antithetical to the basic values of Talmudic Judaism. The socialist Herzl said, &amp;quot;''The anti-Semites will become our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies.''&amp;quot; (June 12, 1895) No wonder Nazi socialists lo ved Zionist socialists—they were simultaneous promoters of racial pseudoscience and specifically the notion that Jews are a &amp;quot;race.&amp;quot; —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 11:49, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Even if the quotes are any true, Herzl was 100% secular and not Talmud like neturei karta are. But ''L'''yibg '''T'''roll, has his word salad copy pasta. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 18:53, September 14, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LT, I scrolled through the link. Without reading much text, I didn't see much source material there that was not known at the time or that I'm not familiar with.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::As a johnny-come-lately to this argument, is LT trying to make the contention that Zionists in the 1930s were ideological kin of the Nazis? To put it politely, a researcher needs to understand what we mean by [[historical reasoning]]. Ben Gurion, and others, were acting under threats and coercion in the best interests of their people. Some might call that &amp;quot;collaboration&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;collusion&amp;quot;, under duress however, hoping to avoid all-out war and the eventual outcome that occurred in the 1940s. It wasn't voluntary &amp;quot;cooperation&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:21, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[EC] It is a well-documented fact that the Zionists were ideological kin to the Nazis. Both camps were:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::*propagators of racialist pseudoscience&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::*communal socialists&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::*outspoken antisemites&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::*insistent on defining Jews as a &amp;quot;race&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::*anti-assimilationist and argued that Jews could not integrate into European nations&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::*backed by the Anglo-Freemasonic financial axis (the Warburgs were board members of I.G. Farben at the same time they colluded with the Sulzbergers and right-wing B'nai B'rith/AJC elites to sabotage the boycott of Nazi Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Two sides to the same coin. Really not hard to miss if you studied the full facts. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 12:32, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;*Actully, Sulzberher's b'nai b'rith were ANTI ZION LEFT WINGERS at the time and they didn't &amp;quot;collude&amp;quot; just were,against boycotting not to anger them further. But Sulzberger followed the main anti boycott LUTHERANS&lt;br /&gt;
But per '''L'''ying '''T'''roll the Nazis were the good guys. Because his lexicon is upside down.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]]]][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 18:53, September 14, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::And to a large extent Ben Gurion and German Zionists were successful. Only about 50,000 Jews in Germany after 1939 were killed in the holocaust because most had emigrated by 1939; the millions who did perish came from Nazi-occupied territories ''after'' the war had started - from Poland, Ukraine (in those days it was largely known as &amp;quot;Russia&amp;quot; or the USSR), the Baltics, France &amp;amp; [[the West]], and other German occupied territories or Axis allies. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:31, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Well, as it turned out, Jewish emigration to Palestine was shut down by none other than the British. It's really not that difficult to recognize the full picture: both Revisionist head Jabotinsky and Grand Mufti al-Husseini were British puppets set up for dialectical clash—ultimately, the Anglo-Zionist agenda was to ensure near-total European Jewish subservience to Zionism, so they forced European Jewry to remain trapped under Nazi-Fascist mass murderers so the postwar propaganda pitch could finally (and successfully) convince the survivors of the &amp;quot;need to get out of antisemitic Europe&amp;quot; as part of their so-called &amp;quot;we told you that assimilation wasn't possible.&amp;quot; You never recognized this after decades of studying? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 12:37, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[EC] And thank you for mentioning Ben-Gurion. Let's check out what he said:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical reckoning of the people of Israel.|||David Ben-Gurion, Dec. 1938}}&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::—[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 12:47, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Here's where you need historical reasoning: that quote was Ben Gurion's reaction to the Brits shutting down Jewish emigration to Mandatory Palestine. Ben Gurion could see what was coming. Antisemitism in the 1930s and 1940s is by no means unique to Germany. German Jews, who emigrated to Poland, France, and elsewhere in Europe - or for that matter all Jews anywhere in Europe - were fingered by locals to the Gestapo and Nazi occupiers. Sure, the Germans did not occupy England, but the British government showed how unwelcoming of Jews they were when they shut down emigration to Mandatory Palestine, which the Zionists viewed as their only safe haven. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:11, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Yes, it was shut down by the British (we've been over this point).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::LT doesn't understand the factionalism among Jews (I suppose few non-Jews do). Ben Gurion tried to persuade German Jews to emigrate to Mandatory Palestine; some, for whatever reason (lack of funds, affinity for the West, etc), emigrated to Poland or France. By 1939-40, they were rounded up with Polish and French Jews. They should have listened to Ben Gurion and taken him more seriously. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:46, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Ah yes, the Jews should've just listened to those antisemitic Nazi-collaborating fifth columnists. Also, you're forgetting that Ben-Gurion in the 1938 Evian Conference (along with Chaim Weizmann) '''OPPOSED''' the rescue/emigration of Jews to the United States. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 12:50, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Oh, the United States is a safe haven for Jews in 1938 now - after [[FDR]] turned away the ''St. Louis'' (cited in your own source link). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:17, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;All these have been debunked weeks ago by Telling.  But still the cruel fake &amp;quot;researcher&amp;quot; LT goes neo nazi way to blame the Jews for their suffering. Does LT think if he will  just repeat one more time the...&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:00, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::[[Special:Diff/2074492|Yet again]] at that Nazi-style censorship, eh, &amp;quot;Dianne&amp;quot;? It was utterly pointless this time for you, quite unfortunately, seeing RobSmith already said he read through the webpage! Also, I did not blame &amp;quot;the Jews&amp;quot; &amp;quot;for their suffering.&amp;quot; YOU are the one doing that right now by attributing the Nazi collaborators I expose as &amp;quot;the Jews.&amp;quot; Just as Goebbels did, so you also do, aka accusing others of the very points '''YOU''' are guilty of... which goes to show who your spiritual kindred are. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 13:05, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::And Telling barely, if at all, &amp;quot;debunked&amp;quot; anything. All he did was regurgitate linkspam and oversauced copypasta. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 13:08, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Redundant LT is delusional if he thinks anyone believes his goal is to debate or truth.  Of course all this garbage talk has been answered before. If LT would be a youngman who wants to know, one would still reply. Remember Rob how you asked him about concluding before &amp;quot;research&amp;quot; to justify his predetermined &amp;quot;finding&amp;quot;?  But even after I just mentioned Dianne's grandparents relatives who perished there, this bigot is still at it. Who is he trying reying to impress? Becauae knowledge he twists . Is it about his shameless proud sadism?'''&lt;br /&gt;
By now, the issue is (not just his falsehood on history but) already LT &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;personality&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. Prov. 21:23[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:34, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;So sad. Barely passing alcohol age limit and has ao much evil in him. Was he abused as a child?&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 14:04, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Conservative]] made a big impression on him. The only difference is he can be creative in his responses, and doesn't just cut n paste [[spam]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:09, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::He needs to read these two books:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Lucy S. Dawidowicz, [https://www.thriftbooks.com/w/the-war-against-the-jews-1933-1945_lucy-s-dawidowicz/265727/item/2766931/ The War Against the Jews, 1933-1945];&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Mark Aarons and John Loftus, [https://www.thriftbooks.com/w/the-war-against-the-jews-1933-1945_lucy-s-dawidowicz/265727/item/2766931/ The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish People].&lt;br /&gt;
:::Then we can talk. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:15, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Remember this vicious by devilish LT  attack on my family, after knowing what my grandparents family went through? [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2068568]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I'm sure you know plenty about &amp;quot;devilish&amp;quot;-ness given who your father is. —LT Rev. 22:13 Thursday, 01:14, July 25, 2024 (EDT)&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 14:39, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Dianne, I already said above that I did not know (until today, to be specific) that your family perished in the Holocaust. By lying yet again, you are only validating what I said about your father. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 14:53, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::OMG, c'mon now. What started out, and should have been an apology, you turn into an accusation and personal attack. You're as dumb as Ken. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:24, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I was supposed to apologize? Oh well, very unfortunate for the charlatans who thought they could emotionally bait me with ethnic weaponization. What, all three of you expect me to be as flaky and morally unscrupulous as you all are? I believe this was website created as a CONSERVATIVE encyclopedia, for the record, not a mindless Communazionist echo chamber for fascisymping. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:30, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::A summary debunking LT redundant BS was sent to Rob. Since LT is against facts.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 16:05, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::甚至他的道歉也令人悲伤。[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::okay okay, I am going to try to help our young friend see and understand his flawed logic in these two sentences:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''&amp;quot;(a) I already said above that I did not know (until today, to be specific) that your family perished in the Holocaust. (b) By lying yet again...&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Now, which is it? If the person is a liar, why do accept, apparently sincerely, the (a) statement? I'll answer that question: because your response is based upon emotion, and not thinking. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:37, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*说实话，当（###偏执类型）基督教欧洲屠杀数百万人时，中国却拯救了犹太人......[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 16:38, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Unfortuneately what has happened, and largely through the efforts of [[User:Conservative]], [[Conservapedia]] has become a haven for [[malicious]] [[troll]]s who just want to get a rise out of people, and really pay no attention to the subject material they are working on. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:45, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;This pathetic person LT couldn't stop from attacking my family even while &amp;quot;apologizing&amp;quot; while it's his type of bigoted Christians who led the whole calamity 1933-1945&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; - the bigger picture. The minimum he could have done is not pretending to be an &amp;quot;expert.&amp;quot;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:33, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Yet ''again'', Dianne, you are shamelessly lying. The traditional supersessionist theology I adhere to was in [https://eidos.uw.edu.pl/files/pdf/eidos/2022-01/eidos_19_kozyra.pdf direct opposition] to the Marcionite, Jesuitic &amp;quot;Positive Christianity&amp;quot; of Nazism. Your neo-Goebbels apparatus remains (quite unfortunately) pathetic, I'm sorry to say. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:21, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ah yes, it's all just Conservative's fault. Outstanding pivot, RobSmith. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 20:23, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;To RobS, What is worse, LT language and choice of terms or his fake &amp;quot;research?&amp;quot; Or his stubborn misconduct as a whole?&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; (No revision attempts, Polish or other, will erase LT fanatical Christian bigotry type that led and was the driving force. But maybe if LT keeps going on with his overall revisions attempts I will tell exactly the sentiment by many, masses --evoking JC--  especially in Poland. But let's all remember who caused this here on CP).[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 23:26, September 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::We evidently have the ruling from on high now - henceforth irrational arguments, harassment, and personal attacks in Conservapedia are okay again. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:24, September 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Did LyingTroll conclude that Chamberlin was a zionist?[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 02:16, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== distortions and nazi nazi fetish ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is regarding lying bigot LT (the one with nazi nazi nazi fetish) the other day (weeks ago) talking about 'judgement day.' Pretty pretentious coming from such a young guy in age already reaching so many sins especially in inciting hatred amd preaching distortions. Fortunately most Christians are not into so called &amp;quot;avenging Jesus blood&amp;quot; by conducting an unholy war FOR that, like LT.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 02:16, September 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yah, I know. But the boss recently ruled personal attacks &amp;amp; outrageous innuendo is acceptable conduct in [[Conservapedia]], so there isn't much I can do about it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:21, September 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::That is sad. The sick bigot is still on with his nazi nazi nazi fetish (he also loves sites MEE and others linked to Islamic Qatar which Telling pointed out)..The liar will lie again that he didn't know about my grandparents ' relatives which his why he made IT PLURAL [https://archive.is/P8p6g/777e02931b108534e0914f0c960d8bc67f00207b.jpg][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:57, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Listen, you Jud# eo-Nazi: as a conservative aligned with the [[realist school of international relations]] in the mold of [[John J. Mearsheimer]], '''I don't give an oversized ''canalis analis'' what emotion-baiting &amp;quot;bUt mY AncEsTeRz&amp;quot; story you offer in self-justification &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;if zero moral decency is left in you.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;''' If anything, that only discredits yourself, because you betray the memory of your slaughtered relatives as the 21st-century ''kapo'' you are by endorsing the very Zionist ideology which fue led Nazi collaborationism. But go on, keep crying. Keep outing yourself as a liberal Na zi, &amp;quot;Dianne.&amp;quot; —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 12:11, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
And still '''the sick with nazi disease fetish:  still with nazi language. Cristo nazi judo nazi /LT  nazi nazi '''. As Telling pointed out. The issue isn't any more just with LT's rewriting facts and falsifying history, but his personal '''viciousness'''. And yes, LT &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;word salad &amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (anglo-jesuite-mason-evangelical)  is still as incoherent as in June, when he began the devilish wild rampages. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:06, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Keep crying. &amp;quot;As is the mother, so is her daughter.&amp;quot; (Ezek. 16:44) You are of your mother Babylon. (see Isa. 47) —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 12:57, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::In the internet age, nazism has become a joke or a meme leaving many people under 40 without having any understanding what it is. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:24, September 9, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Blessings to you Rob.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 09:34, September 16, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;[[Special:Diff/2075108|Personal attacks ARE NOT free speech in Conservapedia]]&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, sure. So then: why did you let two perfidious Mo(#)ad operatives spread neo-Nazi lies about me? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 01:29, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I dunno; maybe cause I didn't want to be called a totalitarian fascist for enforcing the rules. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:30, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::You don't want to be called a totalitarian fascist for... rebuking totalitarian fascism? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 01:31, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's already happened; User:Davidb4 accused me of suppressing &amp;quot;free speech&amp;quot; when I reverted personal attacks from his talk page which violated CP's civility clauses. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The fundamental problem with [[Conservapedia]] is, Admin are allowed to make both public and private accusations against each other. And there is no dispute resolution process. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:40, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::DavidB4's talk page is '''his''' talk page. RobSmith, your own perfidy against other Conservapedia users (let alone myself) rivals that of a certain ''someone's'' perfidious betrayal of me in using his upload privileges—which last I remember was attained due to you and I persuading Andy to grant them to him—to &amp;quot;quietly&amp;quot; unleash a torrent of [[:File:Profile- hate and lies1.jpg|outright lies]] against me that have zero relevance to building an encyclopedia.&lt;br /&gt;
::::Please apply your standards consistently. If you're ''legitimately'' against personal attacks on Conservapedia, you better start taking action against those two Mo(SS)ad infiltrators instead of tolerating their neo-Nazi crap. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 01:49, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As an Admin, Davidb4 has two responsibilities: abide by the rules and enforce the rules. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:22, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::As an Admin, you have two responsibilities: abide by the rules and enforce the rules. Why are you letting two ill-faith non-conservative Mo(SS)ad shills operate a cesspool of censorship and neo-Nazi hate on Conservapedia? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 02:56, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You know very well that two years ago you viciously character-assassinated Conservapedia editors as &amp;quot;Nazisymps&amp;quot; for criticizing Vladimir Putin. And now you will look the other way and play dumb when the wiki is overrun with Zionazisymping at a time the Fourth Reich Holocausts Gaza with [https://www.middleeasteye#net/news/majority-israelis-want-censorship-social-media-posts-sympathetic-gazas-civilians completely zero shame]? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 07:29, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Are you saying advocates of aid to Nazis are not Nazisymps? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Personally, I get the impression you use the term &amp;quot;nazi&amp;quot; to mean &amp;quot;bad guy&amp;quot;, and that's insufficient for any dialogue. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:25, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Of course advocates of to aid to Nazis are Nazisymps. That's precisely why shills for Israeli aid are Nazisymps. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 19:29, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::''&amp;quot;I get the impression you use the term 'nazi' to mean 'bad guy'&amp;quot;'' No, buddy, that's what '''you've''' been doing for the past few years, equivocating ''any'' critic of Putin whatsoever as a &amp;quot;Nazisymp.&amp;quot; —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 19:31, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Oh, Putin and the Russian people are just imagining the nazis in Kursk and Ukraine. okay. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:54, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The interesting part about current poll ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ahead of the debate, it's tight [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/harris-trump-poll-pennsylvania-michigan-wisconsin-debate/] in vital states: PA/MI/WI is that it's right after the big noisy expensive/expansive DNC.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:33, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not optimistic about the coming election; elections are supposed to develop a common consensus from which we can all move forward, but wars disrupt the ability to develop a consensus. In [[Conservapedia]], [[User:Conservative]] did &amp;quot;a [[Zelensky]]&amp;quot; - squandered our resources and time to develop a common consensus, and now it's too late in the game. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:41, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::We conservatives are pretty much worried. No doubt. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 22:05, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::User:Conservative enthusiastically [https://www.conservapedia.com/User:Conservative#Russia jumped on the pro-war bandwagon] with [[Biden]] and [[Kamala]], linked his Essays to various Categories to affect [[Google]] algorithms, and effectively halting other editors from adding to those Categories. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:23, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;we conservatives&amp;quot; Hexagramic neo-N#zi apologist for the Fourth Reich says what now? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 07:31, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Let's see how objective tomorrow's debate is gonna be. Holding my breath...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 06:12, September 9, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*LT is a &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; now. LOL.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Did you miss my recent Substack posting? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Recommend checking it out. I see in the &amp;quot;Recipients&amp;quot; tab that you haven't opened it yet. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Wednesday, 00:14, September 11, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I've been a little busy, what with World War III and all. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:17, September 11, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps understanding WWII better would be of help with your WWIII research. That posting is about the connection between a certain Austrian art reject and a certain financial family. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 23:11, September 11, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yah, I saw the headline. That's why I avoided it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 06:05, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Unfortunate. You actually could've learned some useful historical facts. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 07:32, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Your &amp;quot;facts&amp;quot; I read about decades ago. Nothing new has surfaced since. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Yes indeed, I've been saying all this time that there's &amp;quot;nothing new under the sun.&amp;quot; :) All my research is just a re-assessment of the established historical reality, albeit rewritten and organized in my own words into a cohesive explanation. IMO [https://corbettreport.com/who-funded-hitler-video/ Corbett] touched on interesting points but made the mediocre mistake of harping on genetic ancestry (and some of his cited sources are suspiciously fringe cranks). —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 14:01, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Fringe cranks? Pot meet kettle. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Double standards are a ☭liberal☭ trait, buddy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So you never once bothered restoring my listings of Zionist_ /Nazi quotes removed by Dianne, but the moment I return recompense on him/her/_Nazi, you rollback to restore Dianne's content, eh? For the record, wannabe dual loyalty isn't a conservative trait either: you're either on the side of Conservapedia or you're on the side of (Jud=eo-)Nazi Mo(SS)ad infiltrators. Take your pick—one or the other. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 07:29, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Rob knows that LT is ONLY repeating the same spam LT has already posted months ago . [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 10:40, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As an Admin, I could read LT's reversion was solely a reprisal toward another user. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also Dianne, please refrain from putting usernames in subheadings and edit summaries. Thanks. In the immortal words of Rodney King, &amp;quot;Can't we all just get along?&amp;quot; [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:35, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Fair enough. Remember [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:LT&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2071458 this] edit summary (w usernames)? [Incidentally, it is why he supports fascist larouche. To back up his pre-determined &amp;quot;conclusions&amp;quot;]. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:30, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ask him why so many Jews volunteered to fight fascism in the Spanish Civil War. Spain is not Palestine. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:42, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
* Hey, '''L'''ying '''T''roll is just against &amp;quot;zionists&amp;quot;, remember? [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 09:33, September 16, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Nice try with your deflection. Aren't you supposed to be fixing your pseudomarital problems with Ken? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 14:02, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I ain't in to [[Anal sex and obesity]]. But if you want to have a deep, probing discussion on those two specialties, Ken's da man. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:58, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Don't forget [[atheism and penile cancer]]! —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Friday, 12:30, September 13, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==More from distorting lying trolling upside down language sick style==&lt;br /&gt;
More from '''L'''ying '''T'''roll upside down language sick style:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes is No.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
No is yes.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Racism is &amp;quot;anti racist&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Sharon is Hamaz.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hamas is IDF.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Terror is human rights.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Trump is Harris.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Harris is Trump.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Good is bad.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bad is good.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Nazis are &amp;quot;anti-nazi&amp;quot;...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Iran is now Israel.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
US is North Korea.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Islam is Christianity.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Real original true Nazis - not their fault &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;-&lt;br /&gt;
Their victims are so called &amp;quot;nazi&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Right is left.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Left is right.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Night is day...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 00:40, September 13, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Every Zionist accusation is a confession. Thanks for outing yourself, Dianne. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Friday, 12:29, September 13, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;After weeks of searching negativity, if he finds Lying Troll will cheer: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;He was on to something&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those that see through him:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;you just outed yourself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 18:57, September 14, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks Dianne. He also uses quotation marks only where not applicable. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;This anti truth LT also links talmud to anti Talmud secular personalities. &amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:12, September 14, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::He learned this [[troll]] technique from [[User:Conservative]]; he never had any interest, knowledge, or expertise in world affairs. Then, suddenly when MSM focuses on it, he decides to troll people who spent a lifetime studying the issues. His real target isn't Zionism, it's you, the contributor. It's a symptom of a social pathology. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:13, September 14, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Does he have a cure? &lt;br /&gt;
_&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;BTW Regarding &amp;quot;zionists&amp;quot;, LT knows I said before that I'm not considering myself a true one. In any case LT (or DavidDuke) mean 'Jews.' No matter how he tries to &amp;quot;polish&amp;quot; and edit his nonsense. He fools no one here.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; _&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's sad what happned to him.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:44, September 14, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I see it more a problem of [[Conservapedia]]'s lack of Community Standards - allowing these [[malicious]] [[troll]]s to run rampant under the guise of &amp;quot;[[free speech]]&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:54, September 14, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are two kinds of [[stupid]] - congenital and acquired. In [[User:Conservative]]'s case it's congenital - he was born with certain mental limitations. In [[User:LT]]'s case it's acquired - monkey see monkey do. He sees what User:Conservative get's away with and apes it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:06, September 14, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Nice triple projection from all of you; first off, Telling might want to check the facts again and realize that David Duke is an an [https://larouchepub#com/eiw/public/1991/eirv18n42-19911101/eirv18n42-19911101_064-is_david_duke_a_bush_republican.pdf Anglo-CIA] [https://larouchepub#com/eiw/public/1990/eirv17n26-19900622/eirv17n26-19900622_063-david_duke_state_department_soci.pdf asset] pushed into prominence by ADL puppet Mordechai Levy—IOWs, he's way more like you, buddy. Second, RobSmith is patently wrong—I most definitely do not take inspiration from DeMyer. This is yet again one of his projection schemes, accusing me of the very guilt he owns loud and clear. In the past, RobSmith, you (if I remember well, and do correct me if I'm verifiably wrong) simultaneously told me to follow Wikipedia protocols and later accused me of exhibiting WP editor characteristics.&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, if Telling and Dianne are truly &amp;quot;Jewish,&amp;quot; why did they apparently just break the Sabbath? I know for a fact that the timestamps in [[Special:RecentChanges|SRC]] don't lie, and the postings of Telling in particular hours earlier were almost certainly before sunset. Oh well, there goes that &amp;quot;but I'm Jewish&amp;quot; card! I guess I'll have to simplify the status of you two from &amp;quot;Jud _ o-Nazi&amp;quot; to just &amp;quot;Nazi.&amp;quot; —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 22:28, September 14, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::That's another thing you share with Ken: you only listen to half of what people say to you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:53, September 14, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::No, it's just that at this point in life I don't have time to respond to every single point. I'd be here all day if I devoted my life debunking every lie coming out of that Judobrownshirted Nazi sack of excrement masking him/her/idiot self &amp;quot;Dianne.&amp;quot; —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 00:02, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Many people spend vacation in the summer or parts of it in different time zones. But '''L'''ying '''T'''roll is against &amp;quot;zionists&amp;quot;, which is why he cites anti zionist Sulzberger his &lt;br /&gt;
b.b. at the time. First, a Jew is whoever is born to Jewish mom. Practicing does not change that. Who on earth or heaven needs his sabbath The LyingTroll warping history with his vile hate (&amp;quot;ecrement&amp;quot;???)[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 02:13, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::'''LT's vandalizing Dianne's page proves Rob is right. LT is about personal baseness'''.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 02:24, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;Innocent&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;'''L'''ying'''T'''roll's comparing it to his vile pushing &amp;quot;Arbeit Macht Frei&amp;quot; devils as &amp;quot;honest&amp;quot;, and conuntless repetition of his earlier spam and terrible &amp;quot;sources&amp;quot;- -  links..&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 03:38, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Daily Pennsylvanian, Nov. 1990: [https://www.thedp.com/article/1990/11/speaker_discusses_neonazism_as_larouche_followers_protest Larouche FOR KKK and David Duke].&lt;br /&gt;
What causes an Asian boy to whitewash the KKK via fascist larouche garbage? Incidentally, Chinese didn't have a history of Anti Semitism prior to the Islamic Republic's proxy Oct 7 massacres, mass rape under Allah Akbar. Since then, Chinese government has been influenced and outsmarted by the Mullahcracy&lt;br /&gt;
(David Duke's pals. Mahdi - dreamers). And no. Not merely anti Israel social media. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 04:37, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I never whitewashed the KKK, you perfidious neo-Nazi sack of excrement. But sure, keep projecting. '''You''' are the one who denies the Anglo-Masonic origins of the white hood, buddy. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:11, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::LT: You know better. This ain't Rationalwiki. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::RobSmith: you know better. '''You''' turned Conservapedia into an RW replica. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:17, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You're not discussing issues. You're going over the top with personal attacks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:23, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''All those who take the sword will perish by the sword.'' I'm simply returning the playbook tactics of Telling and Dianne on them. If you were a realist conservative, you would acknowledge this fact instead of whining like a liberal. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:30, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::All those who fling a sack of excrement will be smitten with a sack of excrement. Takes this as a warning. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:47, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Yes, that's why I threw the sack of excrement right back at those two. They spent the past two months pushing brazen lies about me, and I only returned the nasty playbook on them after they incessantly brown-baited me first. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:53, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::At this point it's hard to switch back from a sack of excrement to a discussion of issues. I suggest get off this donkey issue, which you apparently have used dubious sources, and give it a rest. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:00, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Fair emphasis on the former part. I suppose I need to simmer down at times. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 11:12, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:[EC] And you want to play the race card, Telling? Let's start with you: if you're so &amp;quot;Jewish,&amp;quot; why do you fullthroatedly defend the very collaborators who helped the Nazis murder your ethnic kin? Too blinded by mindless bootlick brainwash to see the ''kapo'' in you? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:16, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;As established. Of course '''L'''ying '''T'''roll is routinely using WW2 terms as a slur and swearing.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
BTW, nazi fetish LT, '''L'''ying '''T'''roll has mentioned the word kapo 4 or five times these days.  Some were good some where bad (that is an internal Jewish reckoning. There were many &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Jews who converted to Christianity who betrayed the Jewish people by telling on them and inciting the government&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;), but not for a nazi Nazi-fetish-LT terrible boy) but all were under the Nazi threat.&lt;br /&gt;
But what's baseness is, here comes a lowlife &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;with exactly the same bigotry that has set the core hatred in motion&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, and talks about victims. Who says that all relatives of my grandparents were murdered just in a camp where EVERY EMPLOYEE was under the nazi boot and not by fanatical bigots like LT? But just as Lying Troll cast Sulzberger as &amp;quot;zionist,&amp;quot; he is all about hurting people. Not about facts or history.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 09:12, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Haitian migrant stuff explained in &amp;lt;4 minutes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDZD2_Q56ls LLA] seems to be spot-on as usual. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 14:07, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:There's not much unique or special in reading from EIR from 2010 - no facts that weren't known from open source. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:14, September 12, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, it's not a bad idea to remember recent &amp;quot;history.&amp;quot; America needs to repent before proceeding to complain of the &amp;quot;invasions&amp;quot; it deserves. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Friday, 12:32, September 13, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Allow me to summarize more succinctly: the entire migration crisis is a Jesuitically dialectical manipulation scheme—impoverished Latin American Catholic masses are brainwashed by Jesuit-Marxist liberation theology into pouring into Western countries run conveniently by Anglo-Masonically installed &amp;quot;liberal globalists&amp;quot; who enact unchecked immigration policies to intentionally ensure that the bad apples enter in and give all migrants a bad name, thereby giving credence to Knights of Malta/Opus Dei–managed Orange Bolshevist &amp;quot;xenophobia.&amp;quot; —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 01:11, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Wow. Is the fat atheist movement part of the Jesuit conspiracy, too? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:31, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I actually did not evaluate that aspect yet, to my admission. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:17, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==More racist attacks.. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A group of &amp;quot;Middle Eastern-looking&amp;quot; teenagers [ARAB MUSLIM] threw antisemitic slurs, including ‘f***ing Jews.’ &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hjpenns2r][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 18:00, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:They are against &amp;quot;zionism.&amp;quot;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 02:36, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Typical.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:58, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==More on the bigger picture==&lt;br /&gt;
More on the bigger picture:'''&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Jewish Violence in Poland After Liberation. Yad Vashem. (2015).&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.yadvashem.org/articles/general/anti-jewish-violence-in-poland-after-liberation.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is already AFTER the Holocaust on THEIR soil. That old blood libel...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1945-1946.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 22:11, September 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
* LT deleted Rob's reply to this too?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 02:37, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Possible. I haven't checked. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 03:40, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Germany elections are a result  of: ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The election results in Germany is largely an answer to Arab Islamist immigrantsxm' rampages &amp;quot;protests.&amp;quot;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 04:44, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FYI ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you're cracking down on redirects you don't like, I think you missed [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pathetic_Putin&amp;amp;redirect=no this one]. Just letting you know. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 11:50, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yah, we'll get to it sooner or later. For now, let the troll have his fun. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:34, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, now I'm the troll? Not the person who whines all day to Andy, wasting his valuable time. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 22:07, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You don't even recognize how senile you are. Worse than [[Glitch McConnell]] and [[Sleepy Joe]] combined. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 22:09, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I presume you're unable to delete pages? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I heard a while ago that the boss began restricting admins from page deletion. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 22:01, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ken got in a deletion war with me so he yanked both our privileges. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:03, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::LOL. :) —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 22:04, September 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Routh Azov pic ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here .[https://i.postimg.cc/qvgh2W6x/chrome-screenshot-Sep-17-2024-9-23-44-AM-GMT-03-00.png]. Heck even Ukrainians rejected this guy. Still, it doesn't take away from his tendencies.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 02:27, September 17, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:What a nutcase. He sounds [https://youtu.be/FUyInDGLFlo just like several Conservapedia editors]. He'd be right at home here. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:43, September 17, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== New tool.. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So this[https://twitter.com/igorsushko/status/1836095455115251941]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 15:04, September 17, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yah. In a way, it's kinda funny. If you want to play the game of hitech warfare, it's best to understand some of the basics first. It just adds to my distrust of cell phones. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:17, September 17, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Which is why [[Hamas]]' Sinwar went low tech. [https://www.israelnationalnews.com/en/news/396267].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 15:35, September 17, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't like making predictions, however I don't see the point in pre-emptively disrupting Hezbollah communications just for the heck of it. This &amp;quot;trick&amp;quot;, so to speak, can only be used once (although the technology behind it has been known for 30 years). Seems like the other shoe is about to drop and something big is about to happen. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:05, September 17, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::It sure looks like a prelude to escalation. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:55, September 17, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Update: ''Axios:'' [https://www.axios.com/2024/09/18/hezbollah-pager-explosions-israel-suspicions Israel conducted Lebanon pager attack fearing Hezbollah was onto the operation].&lt;br /&gt;
::''&amp;quot;Israel planned to explode the pagers at the eve of a 'surprise attack' on Lebanon, but had to implement the operation early.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Update: [https://youtu.be/AW7ndcMke9g US aircraft carrier in the Middle East is heading home].&lt;br /&gt;
::''&amp;quot;USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier is being sent back to the United States after an extended deployment in the Middle East is to send a message to Israel,&amp;quot;'' i.e. end the war cause the United States will not back you up.&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:13, September 18, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Update: According to [[Ray McGovern]], these software programs are part of Vault 7 (you know, the leak of which caused [[Julian Assange]] to go into exile). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:42, September 19, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Note of clarification; the rumor mill of course is trying to imply the pagers and other microchipped devices were rigged at some central manufacturing facility. That's not how the technology works in my understanding. As I understand it, a continuous low power electronic pulse is sent out from a centralized point causing the batteries to overheat. Of course, you would need all the phone numbers to call.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This should be a heads up to anyone with a cell phone, personal computer, washing machine, TV set, automobile, etc. The [[NSA]], [[FSB]], Chinese intelligence, or numerous terrorist organizations are capable of the same actions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:46, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::For example, if you could access the list of all the people who ordered MAGA hats from the Trump website, you could feed that information into a central electrical power generating facility to cause their cell phones and personal computers to explode simultaneously. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:56, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Personally, I don't buy the rigged devices scenario, which even ''Sputnik'' is repeating. The devices were set off simultaneously, which points to remote trigger. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:39, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*From the ''Axios'' article RobS quoted: &amp;quot;but had to implement the operation early.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
This means, that the Zionists planned to set it off when the Hezbollah butchers are in an elaborated targeting of civilians - operation. But had to activate it now for said reason.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 12:03, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It looks like the operation is going forward, despite the withdrawal of US forces. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:08, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::They're left with no choice. Hezbollah attacked immediately after 10/7 Hamas led massacres and never ceased. Many have been injured by Iran's proxy islamofascists. Some died. Tens of thousands of Israelis have been evacuated for long months in the north.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 12:24, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Update: [https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1837002895528509772 Mass Hezbollah Casualties Reported After Goats Rectums Explode.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:47, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Indeed, [https://x.com/Dannyjokes/status/1836823264775262505] funny joke as hell.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 12:56, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Update: ''[[NYT]]:'' National Security Agency general counsel Glenn Gerstell: &lt;br /&gt;
::''&amp;quot;This might well be the first and frightening glimpse of a world in which ultimately no electronic device, from our cellphones to thermostats, can ever be fully trusted...The chief effect is psychological...Just as pervasive surveillance makes people question who might have access to the phones that now contain details, treasures and secrets of one’s life — pictures, text messages, credit card numbers — the sabotage makes everyone fearful that ordinary devices can become an instant source of injury or death...It gnaws at the psyche&amp;quot;.'' [https://archive.is/DpF2y] &lt;br /&gt;
::[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:20, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::The objective was that only the terrorist 'feel' this. It was the most DISCRIMINATING targeting. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Paging all lefties and their mainstream media outlets: If you believe that the Israeli attack on Hezbollah terrorists was indiscriminate, you are part of the problem.&lt;br /&gt;
In my lifetime, I have not seen a more surgical and brilliant attack on an enemy.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Source - [https://nypost.com/2024/09/19/opinion/israels-pager-attack-on-hezbollah-letters-to-the-editor-sep-20-2024/ NYPost][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 08:59, September 22, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There is an update.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Hezbollah beeper blast: timing not due to plan being exposed, sources say - exclusive.&amp;quot; By Yonah Jeremy Bob. 09/22/2024.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-821246 JPost][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:15, September 23, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::They went ahead with the operation anyway, despite Biden/Blinken backing out at the last minute. At best there may have been a 24 hour delay. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:17, September 23, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I could probably pull together a narrative from multiple sources, but it would take some time to recreate all the citations. This is what apparently happened: An explosive compound was painted or dabbed on to the circuit boards or batteries, the size of about a dime, that is too faint for dog sniffers or explosive detectors. A switcheroo was made at some point in the bulk shipment from the factory, which would fit in a medium size or small truck. The explosive compound is activated by a central switch somewhere that contacts the frequency the pagers use, causing the batteries to overheat and explode. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:34, September 23, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I even got the name of the compound somewhere - it starts with a &amp;quot;p&amp;quot;. I'd have to dig it out. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:31, September 23, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I see. It makes sense  However, there are methods that are '''not''' revealed in any source. It is after all the Israeli intelligence. (The Oct/7 failure was largely due to reliance on tech while &amp;quot;Palestine&amp;quot; Arab regime communicated off the grid, just as Sinwar does now). FYI, They knew each and every beeper or Walk Talkie - the location at the [https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/2317166/report-hezbollah-pagers-were-individually-detonated-attackers-knew-where-targets-were.html real] time the terrorists got hit - remotely.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 07:04, September 23, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== They got him - US wanted terrorist ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ibrahim Aqil - Eliminated by the cool &amp;quot;zionists.&amp;quot;[https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/senior-hezbollah-commander-ibrahim-aqil-said-killed-in-beirut-strike/].[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:18, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;when the wicked perish, there are shouts of joy.&amp;quot;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:01, September 22, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Awesome.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:52, September 30, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Musk on Trump ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just saw your entry. Maybe it needs to be added to 2024 election page. I any case, he is fearless against the left mob.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 16:39, September 30, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biden-Harris &amp;quot;ceasefire&amp;quot; hypocrisy  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the [[Biden]]-Harris regime keeps using this [https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2024/09/28/idf-on-u-s-ceasefire-calls-hezbollah-attacked-us-for-a-year-and-no-one-talked-about-a-ceasefire-until-we-fought-back/ cease fire pressure against the self-defense missions] of the ''David vs Goliath'' entity, they never talk about/like that vis-a-vis Ukraine..[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 20:18, September 30, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a pattern since at least Jan 2024. And this[https://nypost.com/2024/09/30/us-news/biden-tells-israel-not-to-invade-lebanon-after-killing-hezbollah-leader-cease-fire-now/] is the latest.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:06, September 30, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks. Let's see ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks. Let's see including his slurs...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:01, October 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:According to the [[Topic ban]] rules, it is supposed to be set for a limited time. [[User:Conservative]] did not set the duration so I may have to. Any ideas or suggestions? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:03, October 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*I actually think, you three: RobS, Conservative, and Telling were super patient with his misconduct  [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:49, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Copied from LT Talk page by him Oct 1 2024==&lt;br /&gt;
===Call me===&lt;br /&gt;
I got [[User:Conservative]]'s scam figured out - how he manipulates page views to promote himself. I have the records, data, and documentary evidence going back months. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:11, August 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please first respond to my email I sent to you four days ago. I also have another project to finish first soon. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 16:40, August 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Okay; four days ago [[User:Conservative]] started [[trolling]] the whole email group nonstop for 48 hours. I lost 2 days. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:02, August 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I assume he left me out of the discussion? After all, I said that you could tell him to troll me instead of you. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Thursday, 17:21, August 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yes he did. It's a series of 82 personal attacks and gossip spammed over 4 discussion threads addressed to me, Andy, Brian, Telling and others who would probably rather not be involved in User:Conservative's personal problems. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Succinctly, here's what happened:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::17 years ago User:Conservative &amp;amp; AceMcWicked got into a contest to control the #1 Most Popular article page (behind MPR) with robots. From there, you can influence and control Google results. User:Conservative had more time, so he eventually won the contest. However, the [[Barack Hussein Obama]] remains the Most Popular page on Conservapedia, averaging about 150 organic hits daily. But User:Conservative ran up his two entries, [[Atehism]] &amp;amp; [[Homosexual agenda]] with 3 million more hits so that it could never be caught. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::17 years later, User:Conservative regularly monitors the Obama entry, then ''adds'' slightly more hits via robots to [[Atheism]] to keep it in tandem with Obama, and slightly above. When you experience 504 Gateway Timeouts, that is when User:Conservative is running robots. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:15, August 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This is what is commonly called a p*ssing contest, in internet parlance. User:Conservative and AceMcWicked got into a p*ssing contest to control [[Conservapedia]] Google results, with Ace pushing [[Barack Hussein Obama‏‎]], [[Adolf Hitler]], and ‏‎[[List of dictators]]. User:Conservative pushed [[Atheism‏‎]], [[Homosexual Agenda‏‎]], [[Homosexuality and Parasites]], ‏‎ [[Homosexuality and Anal Cancer]], and ‏‎[[Atheism and obesity]]. User:Conservative eventually won the contest and Ace gave up (although Ace did make a reappearance some months ago to push Hitler past [[Wikipedia]] by 5,000 hits when I started talking about this in various forums when the Wikipedia article finally dethroned Hitler after more than a decade). Conservapedia has never recovered from the damage done. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:00, August 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::This past week, after being exposed here, [[user:Conservative]] has held the [[Atheism]] article at 5 daily page views below the [[Barack Hussein Obama]] article. Of coarse, he can always let it go a few days and rack up 400 page views in a single day as he did the week before. He thinks we all just fell out of a coconut tree. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:49, August 22, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Another illustration: Yesterday after being exposed for holding the counts down, [[Barack Hussein Obama]] got 89 hits, and he ran the [[Atheism]] article up to 91 hits. He's getting more desperate for losing his grip on the site every day. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:29, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Okay. I don't pay attention to those stats anymore. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 13:36, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Of course not. They are all fraudulent. And have been so for at least 15 years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::He has persistently lied on talk pages, in email discussion groups, and in mainspace articles he created about the supposed &amp;quot;popularity&amp;quot; of his creations. In doing so, he has suppressed the legitimate contributions of Prof. Jensen, Andy, me, you, and multiple other editors who have quit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::For example, no way are the various articles he's created about anal sex, [[bestiality]], or fat atheists on a [[conservative]] website more popular than the [[Phyllis Schlafly]] article. That's just one glaring example. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:46, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::His obsession with anal sex is certainly... ''interesting''. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 21:32, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Just as he has kept [[Atheism]] and [[Homosexual agenda]] in tandem with each other for more than 15 years, he has promoted these two articles and kept them in tandem with each other, well above much more deserving articles with organic hits by other editors:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::*[[Homosexuality and Parasites]]‏‎ (802,934 views)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::*[[Homosexuality and Anal Cancer]]‏‎ (802,459 views)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:39, August 27, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::From June 1, 2024 to August 7, 2024 the [[Barack Hussein Obama]] article averaged 147 daily page views; [[User:Conservative]] then pushed his [[Atheism]] article up with robots to average 152 daily page views. This past week, after being called out, he's holding it at '''5 daily page views''' below Barack Obama.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::He also has to spend some time keeping the [[Homosexual agenda]] article in tandem with [[Atheism]], now at a ratio of about 6:1. In May 2024, the [[Homosexual agenda]] trailed [[Atheism]] by only 17,000 page views, which it did for many months before that. Now they are separated by 60,000. If the Atheism article indeed is that popular, it would have buried the Homosexual agenda a long time ago. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::He's been manipulating [[Conservapedia]] algorithms like this for 15 years. I've extended him [[good faith]] on the matter. But now that it is obvious he uses his [[SEO]] skills to promote himself, and not to optimize pages Andy or any other CP editor creates, it's time to speak up. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:08, August 23, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;[[File:8-21-24a.PNG|center|thumb|Week ending August 21, 2024]]&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;[[File:8-28-24a.PNG|center|thumb|Week ending August 28, 2024]]&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::From August 21, 2024 to August 28, 2024, the [[Atheism]] article is recorded as 633 week-over-week page views or 90 hits per day; in the same timeframe the [[Barack Hussein Obama]] article registered 601 page views or 85 hits per day. A difference of '''5 hits per day'''. Note: He continued this years-long obsession with this fraud even after having been exposed here a week ago. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:26, August 30, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In reality. the [[Homosexual agenda]] article has only received about 15 daily page views since June 1, 2024 which '''''includes''''' the inorganic pushes from robots. This is closer to the real organic hits [[Atheism]] receives, about a dozen a day, not the 100+ he has claimed on the open wiki (even created mainspace pages about) and on email threads for years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:21, August 23, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I don't intend on reading all that. Not that I care anymore either. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 21:38, August 24, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Oh. It relates to everything we discussed when you first created the Slack group. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:18, August 24, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::I have better life matters to prioritize than reading your psychological projection screeds. How ironic of you to accuse me of &amp;quot;hanging out with [censored] too much&amp;quot; over at my publication when you pester Ken on a daily basis while I've almost entirely ceased interacting with him. Shamelessly hypocritical cretin, aren't you? —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 00:04, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Don't hide your light under a bushel; put it on a candlestick for all to see. [https://advesusbabylon substack. com/p/zin azism-and-christian-nationalism] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:15, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Heh, remember when I asked you to advertise my Substack on Conservapedia and you were hesitant/reserved? Now you went right ahead and did my bidding anyways. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:27, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::I never hesitated. I said it was a good idea to do reverse links to both sites. But now you did a Ken and deleted my comment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:34, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Hmm, my bad for the faulty email discussion recollection. Anyways, your comment was deleted for constituting inane lying projection. Unless you want your email removed from the subscription list and your account blocked, I don't recommend bringing up Conservapedian garbage over there again. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 13:00, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::After all, you certainly wouldn't want to miss an upcoming article on Substack—I will be exposing one massive elephant in the room to the Ukronazi story you've completely ignored. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 13:07, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::I thought you could follow through on a train of thought, like ''why'' you created the Slack group. My bad. Go ahead, get carried away with a wind of doctrine, don't let me impede you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:12, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::You actually helped me a great deal, by the way. I remember once you mentioning that modern Ukrainian Nazis are &amp;quot;old school&amp;quot; Nazis rather than neo-Nazis. This perfectly explains the kinship between &amp;quot;Jewish&amp;quot; Nazis and Ukrainian Nazis in addition to why &amp;quot;neo-Nazis,&amp;quot; at least here in the U.S., often present themselves opposed to Ukronazis in the outset—&amp;quot;classic&amp;quot; Nazis are openly ...&amp;quot; After all, neo-Nazis are to &amp;quot;old school&amp;quot; Nazis more or less as neo-Marxists are to classic Marxists. Revisionist/degenerate &amp;quot;fanboy&amp;quot; movements always glorify their idols as what they never truly were, for one because they cannot comprehend and/or accept the possibility that the socialist yokels they venerate were nothing more than Anglo-Masonically controlled puppets on behalf of (Johannite) Jesuitism. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 13:20, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::I'd phrase it this way: American [[neo-Nazi]]s and [[Antifa]] are just wannabees compared to their [[European]] counterparts. They sometimes resemble, and sometimes differ, from real [[Nazi]]s and genuine [[Antifascist]]s (remember, one can be an antifascist without being &amp;quot;[[communist]]&amp;quot;. This has always been the case). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:05, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::Modern &amp;quot;Antifa&amp;quot; is a joint brainchild of Communism and neo-Marxism inspired along the lines of Jesuitic liberation theology. Neo...  were jointly controlled by the ADL and FBI in the previous century and to this day are almost certainly the tools of Freemasonic Anglo-American intelligence agencies. They serve Zionist objectives of ostensibly tarnishing Palestinian human rights activists in that those neo-Nazi degenerates portray themselves supporting Palestinians, just as how, '''[[Special:Diff/1907752|as you said]]''', Nick Fuentes serves globalist objectives of discrediting Putin by seeming to support Putin concurrent to his own neo-Nazi/alt-right credentials. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 21:31, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::Take a step back, and look at ''how'' intelligence agencies have operated by whatever nation or entity at any time in history (going back thousands of years) and ''why'' they exist. You'll soon discover just how really simplistic, naive, and ideological Americans are. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::As to Fuentas, if there ever was a guy begging to be set up as a patsy &amp;amp; stooge like [[Thomas Crooks]] or [[Lee Harvey Oswald]], it would be Fuentas (remember, not all compromised intelligence assets are hired assassins; most are people like [[Anderson Cooper]] or [[David Ignatius]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::To Donald Trump's credit, he has been a target of recruitment for years, but has resisted and preferred to remain his own man. Other billionaires like [[Soros]], [[Bezos]], or [[Elon Musk]] take the government money and contracts, which makes them obligated (and makes them partners with government with the same interests). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:42, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::Trump is controlled by the Jesuits and their Freemasonic proxies. Even Politico went out of their way to point that Mango Caesar was mentored into an egomaniac by [https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/10/donald-trump-2016-norman-vincent-peale-213220/ Norman Vincent Peale], who, by the way, was Scottish Rite 33rd-degree (last I checked).&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::Oh, and have you seen these phony &amp;quot;anti-Trump&amp;quot; opposition movements disbanding themselves? Consider NiKKKi Haley's transformation this year [https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/31/politics/haley-criticism-trump-breakfast-club/index.html][https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/25/politics/nikki-haley-trump-harris-interview/index.html] and more recently Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. [https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2024/08/23/rfk-jr-endorses-trump-after-calling-him-sociopath---his-reversal-explained/]—in both cases, you had an organized movement rallying behind a party/bulwark which stood against Trump, and then they are conveniently dissolved by their leaders who subsequently endorse Trump, leaving the once-hopeful anti-Trump faction of those movements without a central-bound platform/organized cause anymore, while the pro-Trump faction is absorbed into Orange Bolshevism.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::There is somewhat of a historical &amp;quot;precedent&amp;quot; here (though the analogy is not perfect, I will admit): the ''Reichskonkordant''. The Catholic Centre Party (''Zentrum'') was the last organized bulwark comprising a plenteous &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; democratic opposition to Hitler. However, the pact between right-wing clerical fascist (and later Nazi Party official) von Papen and Eugenio Pacelli (later &amp;quot;Pope Pius XII&amp;quot;), concurrent with the dissolution of Zentrum, handed the ultramontane fascist-reactionary faction over to the Nazis while leaving the liberal-democratic faction of political Catholicity without a platform to pose a formidable blockade to Hitler. Leo H. Lehmann's ''[https://archive.org/details/LeoHerbertLehmanBehindTheDictators Behind the Dictators]'' (1942) explains a bit of it, and probably Edmond Paris's ''[https://archive.org/details/secret-history-of-the-jesuits-1983-edmund-paris The Secret History of the Jesuits]'' (1983) as well. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 22:36, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::::::::Okay, I'll look at all that stuff (cross my heart and hope to die). Now here's something you can do for me: Today [[LaRouche]]'s widow came up [https://youtu.be/g0KFs0cxcU4 on autofeed on a show I regularly watch]. Perhaps' you can review it and report back. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:47, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::::::::::I have a massive long-awaited Substack article to compile, develop, proofread, and publish ideally very soon. Now I've got to spend nearly an hour reviewing a video at your request to reciprocate my extensively analysis on it, after you troll my Substack, persistently ignore my points on dialectical cycling, and refuse to restore my TMP comments removed by a bad-faith Jude##azi liberal-fascistic censorshipmongering infiltrator? Oh well, I'll (try to) be longsuffering concurrent with the spirit of forgiveness: perhaps sometimes within tomorrow I will look at that Zepp-LaRouche video and relay you my impressions. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Monday, 23:14, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Let me be specific====+&lt;br /&gt;
When you created the Slack group about October of 2020, one of the first things you asked was why Andy allows [[User:Conservative]] to get away with so many violations of [[Conservapedia:Commandments and Guidelines]]. I pointed to the fact that his two creations, [[Atheism]] and [[Homosexual agenda]] each recorded over 7,000,000 page views. Today the [[Atheism]] article stands at 7,197,449 views; 60,000 of those page views, or 30% of the increase since October 2020, have been registered in just the past 120 days. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:33, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't care. You're wasting your time screeching this to me. —[[User:LT|&amp;lt;code&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;background:#FF8181&amp;quot;&amp;gt;'''LT'''&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;]] '''''[[User talk:LT|&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;Rev. 22:13&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;]]''''' Sunday, 10:26, August 25, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[Let me correct the math on the above statement: It is 60,000 minus the 17,000 that pre-existed, or he ''added'' 43,000 to the Atheism article over the Homosexual agenda during the past 120 days, about 22%. Remember, both articles already had over 7,000,000 hits as recorded in the Slack group four years ago when the Slack group started. I'd be happy to dig it out and [[spam]] it a half dozen times into his [[trolling]] email threads to document what a liar and [[fraud]] he is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::In summary: The [[Atheism]] article received ''less than'' 136,000 in 3 1/2 years; User:Conservative [[inflated]] it to 197,000 over the past 4 months.]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::LT Nazi ironically using cristonazi hindunazi Islamonazi jihadofascist. Old Nazis neo Nazi kkk Luthernazi anglo Nazi Mason Nazi. Nazi. Nazi. . Because the old Nazis died the neo nazis use the Nazi term only on one certain people (not only on JudeaChtistians) - to deny past or present victimhood. Nazi salad word ignorant+bigoted . Pathetic.&lt;br /&gt;
__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
VS to Robs. You have interesting ideas.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:35, August 26, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Your lies/deception/hate===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Dirt on jooz wave'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm glad you uttered that &amp;quot;nakbas&amp;quot; plural propaganda, so you revealed your &amp;quot;palestinian&amp;quot; sources no less (or/and Hamas linked: Qatari/Iranian/Turkish sites or Iranian paid ones). It's also a fact: Islamic pro jihad CAIR lobby / Rashida propaganda referring to Arab &amp;quot;Palestinians&amp;quot; as if they were a separate &amp;quot;race.&amp;quot; Too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Had it been merely about &amp;quot;criticizing&amp;quot; Israel, that would have been a different matter.&lt;br /&gt;
But it's not about Israeli policies. It's that overall anti Jewish negativity that leads you to rewrite history, even ridiculously claiming Hitler --supposedly-- supported power (i.e. National Home) to Jews just because he chased them out before being able to exterminate - his ultimate plan. &lt;br /&gt;
(Heck, you even misinterpreted lately Biblical versus one after the other -  some &amp;quot;Christian&amp;quot; alright).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Looking up your history here we notice (in your earlier writing to Telling for example):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''First''', you hinted linking the destruction of the Temple (by the Romans) to - your suggestion - to rejecting Jesus (the Jew). (I'm confident you might rewrite the destruction of First Temple to support your pretext trend. What ever suits you).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Second''', you wrote against Talmud at least once. Again, as above, I've noticed Telling ignored you on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Third''', you wanted to know about &amp;quot;palestinians&amp;quot; as Amalekites - now we understand you wished to abuse it. Though you are aware, Netanyahu is secular. And Telling explained to you about behaviour like Amalek - as an idea.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Fourth''', you copied/pasted from not so wonderful &amp;quot;sources&amp;quot; and created a mish-mash of unrelated terms, ideologies for one purpose only: to bash Jews - your obsession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Fifth''', you carefully picked out only one part of a salad of studies (inclding Suffism and Hinduism) about Thullies and YOU are the one that chose out. And it is YOU who connected it to N. And via deception you cited a source [Phares] that is rather anti &amp;quot;palestinian&amp;quot; right wing which you claim to be against, yet happy to use it to vilify. (You're fooling no one with that neo Nazi veiled play on word Cabal).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Sixth''', in your war against ADL, you rewrite as if it '''was''' about &amp;quot;defending Israel&amp;quot; historically, only so you can quote LaRouche fantasies and copy neo nazi poison exposed by ADL. We as conservatives criticize ADL on specifics but you attempt to discredit this anti hate organization because of your current intolerance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Seven'', even on Hittler apologetic anti-Israel Candace Owens -- who proves you wrong, you attempted to switch it around to bash your favorite target.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Mason, mason and mason''' - blah-blah. You don't even realize how weird it sounds each time your repeat that word. Though I'm an American, I can tell you, Israelis overwhelmingly don't even know what it means. Unless they will be googling it up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Arabs are stupid''' according to your - 'Arab-Nazi' &amp;quot;concerned&amp;quot; as a so called &amp;quot;canard.&amp;quot; Since they were so &amp;quot;innocently&amp;quot; duped by outsiders to support Hitler and the nazis, then and now. While you know there were initiations by palestine Arabs, as now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a friend, I shortned Zionists to Z, shortned my Italian friend's name, omitted a line where he cursed LT and edited the F word:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From: Jo.....@gmail.com &amp;lt;jo.....@gmail.com&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Date: Thu, Jul 11, 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: On that LT hate. You can forward this.&lt;br /&gt;
To: D... &amp;lt;D..............@gmail.com'&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dianne.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is my prepared reply.  Feel free to forward it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion from what we've read these days (including elevating LaRouch, well, because he said things that sounds like music to his ears, his talk and on main page):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Hitler was merely &amp;quot;supposedly&amp;quot; anti zionist - LT.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Chamberlain was not pro Hitler for his appeasement but a J org. that was fearful, oh yeah, they automatically &amp;quot;were&amp;quot; - says LT (main page and his talk page).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Eichmann was a Z. - says LT, for he wished to get rid of the Jews [first] before he happily received the updated order to exterminate them. LT even quoted his sentence as &amp;quot;proof.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4. This fkd up thinking let's one to believe that the Nazi beaters of Jews on German streets in tghe 1930s' who shouted go to Palestine were... Z.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5. The Arab palestinian leadership (and polled majority) were pro Hitler / sought Hitler out  just because of the British Freemason or masons, and even today, it's &amp;quot;others&amp;quot;' (fill in the blank) fault [&amp;quot;he made me do it&amp;quot; - line. Here the 'shared interests' is out the window too].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6. LT: All Jewish organizations are not good. They were never. But a small fringe group Oct/7 atrocities justifiers - guided by a radical Muslim Brotherhood Palestinian Islam &amp;quot;professor&amp;quot; - they are the good ones?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7. Neo Nazi pro-palestine activity don't matter. Because they are also listed by ADL... Nor do their deviant anti-Zion rhetoric &amp;quot;conspiracy theories&amp;quot; for decades (including &amp;quot; [#OG] occupied government&amp;quot; or/and terming anti-Zionist-Soros as a Z, among other stupidity).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8. For the record: at the time of bashing Kaballah, LT admitted (to T.) he doesn't know (when asked what a -- related -- Biblical verse means), but already chose to link it to &amp;quot;politics&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;race.&amp;quot; How he will try to link it thereafter, is worthless. It's this evidently discredited troubling trend.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9. What is 'intrinsic?' He proudly quoted clips by anti-Zionist-Kaballistic Neturei Karta but was happy to find two people with other opinions (one can only imagine what he googled to prove his claim) so he was quick to &amp;quot;conclude&amp;quot; what he WANTS to. As long as he can create a &amp;quot;CABAL.&amp;quot; And he really thinks that pepple aren't aware of the weird-salad-terminology he uses, used by (Neo) Nazis. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10. The blender of hotchpotch, jumble unrelated terms ignores that Talmudists were non Zionist and even anti Zionists, not only the atheists leftists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11. Just because Hitler didn't see it yet feasible to get rid of the Jews entirely but only to &amp;quot;cleanse&amp;quot; Europe (nothing to do with a 'Jewish National Home' as LT would want one to believe), and on the other hand, (his hated) Zionists wanted more Jews in their historic land... So?&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore they must be &amp;quot;linked.&amp;quot; (Identical too?). Get that warped &amp;quot;logic?&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yet, at the time that Zionism is linked to world Jewry, (current) canard promoter LT is very much concerned exclusively about 'Arab Nazi.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12. LT will exclusively conclude any ideology linked to Jews as negative by cherry picking a case as an &amp;quot;example.&amp;quot; (And/or just copying  messed up sentences). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LT won't do it to other religions. (Difference between LT and T is that T has been criticising those that link Hitler to his Christianity for a variety of reasons). 7.12.24&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words:&lt;br /&gt;
'Hey, I'm not against all Jews. Only against most of them. I even have facts/truth/sources.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Keep in touch D..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jo....&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;hr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;Like my Italian friend said on LT, the definition of hate masked as non hate. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
No one buys that you believe the &amp;quot;theories&amp;quot; you promote. The trouble with Goebbeles was that he wanted others to believe in garbage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We don't want to think that your mind is (already) that corrupted to think that Chamberlin who blocked Jewish immigrants was a Z or that no. 1 anti Jewish &amp;quot;activist&amp;quot; A.H was pro Jewish National Home. Nevertheless, your hate passion leads you to type poison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An Arab from Israel explained to me why the Palestinian-Muslims en masse raped on Oct 7, or as to why they filmed themselves committing certain crimes. He explained: &amp;quot;hate makes you doing things you will regret, but you can't control it.&amp;quot; There is the answer as to &amp;quot;who will benefit,&amp;quot; which you can ask on any murderer who doesn't think it through. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But you already know all that. And still doing it. For the same hate-passion reason aforementioned. You can't hold yourself from the slippery slope road you chose recently. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sure, yesterday you were Jesus and today you're Jeremiah.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm holding my tongue from uttering what is on my lips...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are here not only to spread lies but with a sadistic obsession to hurt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're on a roll.  Get a life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Breather at least. &amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PS&lt;br /&gt;
There is also no point in getting so personal on such a childish way you just did with RobS. We are putting up with your sh#t but not that personal on/with childish stuff. Dont destroy CP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*This guy doesn't even realize how monstrous he is by dismissing the noble work of so many years of B'nai B'rith by fighting hatred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LT's pseudo motto is, you have to find but a case or/and a (dubious) &amp;quot;source,&amp;quot; in order to discredit an organization - which you have predestined to be dismissed because of your 'bigger plan' bigotry. And then to elevate the &amp;quot;found&amp;quot; &amp;quot;source&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
Of course LT refused to answer how many Jews could have been saved had it not been for the White Paper by the Anglos pressured by ALL Arab leadership - radicals or moderate. &lt;br /&gt;
Note how he avoided all the facts, especially the sick joy of most Arabs in Palestine in 1942 as news about mass slaughter came about.&lt;br /&gt;
The new and &amp;quot;improved&amp;quot; line is that not only were the nazi Arab leadership &amp;quot;duped&amp;quot; by Anglos (masonic or not fill in the blanks) when Voice of the Arabs editor joined Goebbeles in 1933 for example, but the Anglos of 1920s are still &amp;quot;duping&amp;quot; the Hamas and PIJ terrorists today to add notes to their favorite book after Koran which is Mein Kampf and why Arafat had it or why Nasser distributed among his soldiers - you see? This &amp;quot;inspiration&amp;quot; by Arab leadership 1950s-2024 is actually by the 1920s Anglos, even each and every swastika the Arabs draw today. Better yet, the Anglos of the 1920s are duping the ever so &amp;quot;innocent&amp;quot; Neo nazis today to join palestine protests because they are &amp;quot;told&amp;quot; to by &amp;quot;da jooz.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have you noticed how he tried to discredit Psalms 137 because a smaller group cited it?&lt;br /&gt;
After LT chose his devious road, he then went out shoppin' but couldn't find his despicable desired &amp;quot;finding,&amp;quot; (yet). Remember his deceptive wording &amp;quot;cabal&amp;quot; play on an ancient study and how he tried to link it via a pathetic pick and choose and &amp;quot;connecting dots&amp;quot; he chose? Hey, not even the mason/mason/mason favorite blah-blah any more. Still, in search of dirt on Z. at least he came back from the flea market with so much joy dancing with his doggie bag. Yet when faced with reality of the complexity of Z the good vs the bad, he still did not back from his pre-designed lines which he &amp;quot;concluded&amp;quot; to be &amp;quot;intrinsic&amp;quot; to his satisfaction - before  searching for dirt which of course he only always &amp;quot;stumbles upon accidentally.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;'''July-Sep 2024'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On top of all that. This bigot who happens to be oriental, adopted the user name &amp;quot;Emmanuel Goldstein&amp;quot; with his nazi-nazi-nazi fetish, a complete upside-down terminology and concepts word salad posting, using style and material garbage-collecting from laRouche and various neo Nazi and/or Holocaust denial pages before googling up who else might mention similar things so he can edit and conceal his original &amp;quot;sources.&amp;quot; He selects out attributed (true or false) to those of masters of deception - a SS guy, recommending it as if &amp;quot;truthful,&amp;quot;  but only if it can defame Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
(In his hotchpotch for loathing, he absurdly &amp;quot;connects&amp;quot; people, concepts and groups, apples and organges often even of opposites. His boring repeated language about true opposites often is: &amp;quot;two sides of the same coin&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
Since 'nazi' is known as negative, he applies it only to Jews. This youngman, who, as was mentioned - barely turning drinking age in 2024/5, has managed to disseminate hatred what other neo Nazis did in years. Obsessive in using WW2 terminology but as slurs,&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; especially if he knows someone had relatives in family as survivors.&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt; Among other things, he wrote Holocaust in plural[https://archive.is/P8p6g/777e02931b108534e0914f0c960d8bc67f00207b.jpg], masking [https://archive.ph/cHgEX/e7ac4ce6fec7e3ace8e1a4a8c9cbbd302e446546.jpg] his venom as merely against &amp;quot;zionists,&amp;quot; of course.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's baseness at his WW2 language, here comes a lowlife with exactly the &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;same bigotry that has set the core hatred in motion&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, and talks about victims blaming only the deceiving end of Nazi Germany. &lt;br /&gt;
Racist '''L'''ying '''T'''roll also &amp;quot;decides&amp;quot; who is Jewish who is &amp;quot;not.&amp;quot; He is excited only about those that go against other Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 09:58, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
===More from distorting lying trolling upside down language sick style===&lt;br /&gt;
More from '''L'''ying '''T'''roll upside down language sick style:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes is No.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
No is yes.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Racism is &amp;quot;anti racist&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Sharon is Hamaz.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Hamas is IDF.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Terror is human rights.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Trump is Harris.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Harris is Trump.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Good is bad.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Bad is good.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Nazis are &amp;quot;anti-nazi&amp;quot;...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Iran is now Israel.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
US is North Korea.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Islam is Christianity.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Real original true Nazis - not their fault &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;-&lt;br /&gt;
Their victims are so called &amp;quot;nazi&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Right is left.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Left is right.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Night is day...&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 09:23, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It's unfortunate to see, but Senior Admin [[User:Conservative]] has transformed [[Conservapedia]] from an information source to a forum for [[Nazi]] [[propaganda]] over the past 2 and a half years.  [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:25, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*I hear Nazi-Nazi-fetish '''L'''ying '''T'''roll has been desperately sending frantic emails. Isn't he busy with the audience who cheer for every David Duke LaRouche speech?[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::He evidently didn't read the bible:&lt;br /&gt;
::*''Where there is no guidance, a people falls, but in an abundance of counselors there is safety.'' - Pr 11:14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*''Plans are established by counsel; by wise guidance wage war.'' - Pr 20:18&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:05, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Ps. 18:27 &amp;quot;...but bring low those whose eyes are haughty.&amp;quot;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Lying Troll  - sockpuppeting on various forums, wikis ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This[https://archive.ph/doPKu] proves '''L'''ying '''T'''roll has been engaging in SP on various sites. It's no wonder, in his overall dishonesty. .[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 18:10, September 18, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== LyingTroll of few human beings who promote that Hitler wanted to &amp;quot;help&amp;quot; the Jews ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few human beings who promote that Hitler wanted to &amp;quot;help&amp;quot; the Jews:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Tom Metzger (in the late '80 on a TV show).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lyndon LaRouche&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lying Troll. (elevating Nazis' propaganda as well).&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 01:07, September 22, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So far: Anyone missing his nazi-nazi fetish (bio nazi, cristo nazi, whatever), upside down warped &amp;quot;two sides of the coin&amp;quot; BS and hurling Holocaust era concepts as racist slurs (before being blocked)? Or pretending to be one's &amp;quot;friend&amp;quot; one day against another member and vice versa the next?[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:49, September 26, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Jesus studied Kaballah [secular] zionists did not. Plus bigotry pattern here.   ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;For a while, LT has been maliciously googling a combination of the Jewish religion and the word N. After &amp;quot;finding&amp;quot; weird &amp;quot;sources,&amp;quot; he tried sneaky ways in editing pages along these 'dark' lines. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before LT adopted (&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;[https://archive.is/P8p6g/777e02931b108534e0914f0c960d8bc67f00207b.jpg] Sep 8, 2024] &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- saved by Dianne&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;) &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;the whitewashing of Nazis by Abbas about so called &amp;quot;50 holocaust[sic]s plural... &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weeks after publicity of Holocaust denier and liar &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;[https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-758091], with a long record [https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2023/09/13/mahmoud-abbas-jewish-problem/] &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;of rewrite of history - Mahmoud Abbas uttered the &amp;quot;Khazar&amp;quot; myth and was slammed all over.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-66741336], [https://www.timesofisrael.com/eu-abbass-holocaust-speech-fuels-antisemitism-insults-holocaust-victims/], [https://www.eureporter.co/world/israel/2023/09/11/eu-slams-mahmoud-abbas-false-and-grossly-misleading-remarks-on-jews-and-anti-semitism/], [https://www.thejc.com/news/world/uae-condemns-mahmoud-abbas-claim-that-hitler-killed-jews-because-of-social-role-xxmnvrmi], &lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.australianjewishnews.com/australia-condemns-mahmoud-abbas-antisemitic-remarks/], [https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-758258], [https://nationalpost.com/opinion/mahmoud-abbas-openly-flaunts-his-antisemitism-for-all-to-see],&amp;lt;b&amp;gt; even by anti-Israel liberal&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; [[Haaretz]][https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2023-09-11/ty-article-opinion/.premium/mahmoud-abbas-once-an-antisemitic-holocaust-denier-always-an-antisemitic-holocaust-denier/0000018a-7f9c-d2a8-a5ca-7ffd39600000]), &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;LT asked me about it &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;[https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Telling#What_do_you_know_about_the_DEBUNKED_Khazar.E2.80.93myth.3F], &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;so I referred him then to the RW piece. Now with his marathon against Da Jouz, he tried to promote it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Remember, it is LT who tries to change the status quo of CP from what/how it has been for years.&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Recently , as part of his long terrible record of provoking members one against the other, he has been desperately emailing falsehood, of course. So I clicked on LT's the (radical liberal) [[Haaretz]] link.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, neither ''Conservative'', nor ''RobSmith'' nor ''Dianne'' nor l, have ever supported the targeting of non terrorists by some of the &amp;quot;Hill boys&amp;quot; who are a losely bunch of youth. But again, like he did on the Oct 7 Arab Palestine massacres, quoting 'Haaretz' [https://www.conservapedia.com/Haaretz] of one case of panic after it was already attacked, and expanding what they didn't say, all in order to support his bigotry. This is LT's pattern of &amp;quot;sources.&amp;quot; And he links people, ideologies, groups who are never connected too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Secondly, it's different if one Jew mentions on another this N term. Just as blacks freely hurl that N word on other blacks.  But not for this one with his young age and already with such a horrific history.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And in one single rant, LT has managed to link opposites, as usual. Despite the hard facts, that the Israeli intelligence are harsher on radicals among settlers (- who I'm against) and or violent among &amp;quot;hill boys&amp;quot; (- who I'm against), than on Arabs. These non-Arabs face real torture by Mossad, Shin Bet interrogators. (Examples among many:[https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/settlers-leaders-to-netanyahu-probe-torture-claims-by-duma-suspects-438008],&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.jewishpress.com/news/police-news/seeking-confession-at-all-costs-israeli-court-ag-endorsed-torture-of-jewish-american-minor/2018/02/08/]).&lt;br /&gt;
Though much of &amp;quot;settler violence&amp;quot; is rather provoked by so called &amp;quot;human rights activists.&amp;quot; [https://www.jns.org/how-the-settler-violence-campaign-works/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Someone told him in a dream that his laughable &amp;quot;monograms&amp;quot; are &amp;quot;not&amp;quot; childish.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 😂. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;One would ask why LT &amp;quot;deserves&amp;quot; attention, the answer is, that to destroy, even a little -- nobody --kid could do horrific damage.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as the holy Talmud said, whoever persecutes the Jewish people, ascends...for a while, till he drops and falls (in shame).&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 08:21, September 22, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Call me an eternal optimist, but I see an opportunity here for User:LT to show some leadership. He could step up and apologize to the community for abusing editors on a matter he knows little about, and corrupted by media accounts. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:44, September 22, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Cheers RobS. But not if his &amp;quot;apology&amp;quot; is as &amp;quot;sincere&amp;quot; as weeks ago injecting WW2 terms as slurs ONLY to hurt people. Besides, he has already done do much damage with his poisonous nazi nazi fetish and warped &amp;quot;history&amp;quot; spamming,  upside down terminology.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:54, September 22, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Here precisely is the problem: We have editors who know and understand ZERO about the so-called 'Israel-Palestinian dispute' or the 'Ukraine-Russia conflict', they try to educate themselves by popular media accounts, and spend months and months harassing other editors with their newly founded 'wisdom' and 'expertise'. They are essentially [[troll]]s, and do not understand ''why'' [[Conservapedia]] was founded. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:34, September 22, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Speaking of misinformation. '''L'''ying'''T'''rolls repeated links --as pointed out by Telling-- on the M.E. conflict are either Iranian or Qatari linked, or of the radical left. &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:31, September 22, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::AlJazeera/MiddleEastEye/TheNewArab are Qatar linked; any &amp;quot;.ir&amp;quot; and pressTV al-medayeen or Mehr among many others are Iranian (Islamic Fascist Republic influences are at ''Grayzone'' too, as even liberal WaPo exposed, hence, certainly any M.E. &amp;quot;data&amp;quot; there isn't reliable); any &amp;quot;.tr&amp;quot; and TRT or Anadolu is Turkey's. Next, he will pick an [[Islamism|Islamist]] Turkey's government linked site...as &amp;quot;source.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In regards to what Rob said, &lt;br /&gt;
Proverbs: &amp;quot;He that covereth his transgressions shall not prosper; but whoso confesseth and forsaketh them shall obtain mercy.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt2828.htm]. Emphasis on '''forsaketh'''.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 16:36, September 26, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Amen. Everything the New Testament says is said in the Old Testament. ''There is no new thing under the sun.'' [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:37, September 26, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nazi fetish still hurling slurs  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''LT still used K. As a slur (via email like Sep 29 and Sep 30), knowing fully well my family history and grandparents linked to Holocaust survivors. '''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following is copied from September 20 entry on RobS talk page:&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])•&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=4&amp;gt;As established. Of course '''L'''ying '''T'''roll is routinely using WW2 terms as a slur and swearing.&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
BTW, nazi fetish LT, '''L'''ying '''T'''roll has mentioned the word kapo 4 or five times these days.  Some were good some where bad (that is an internal Jewish reckoning. There were many &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Jews who converted to Christianity who betrayed the Jewish people by telling on them and inciting the government&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;), but not for a nazi Nazi-fetish-LT terrible boy) but all were under the Nazi threat.&lt;br /&gt;
But what's baseness is, here comes a lowlife &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;with exactly the same bigotry that has set the core hatred in motion&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;, and talks about victims. Who says that all relatives of my grandparents were murdered just in a camp where EVERY EMPLOYEE was under the nazi boot and not by fanatical bigots like LT? But just as Lying Troll cast Sulzberger as &amp;quot;zionist,&amp;quot; he is all about hurting people. Not about facts or history.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 09:12, September 20, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am in agreement. The hurling of slurs at other users (for example, &amp;quot;[https://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Community_Portal/archive2#RobS_becoming_a_pawn_and_a_.22useful_idiot.22_of_an_atheist_website a useful idiot of an atheist website]&amp;quot;) has a long and destructive history in [[Conservapedia]]. I have been trying to reform the process for more than a dozen years, to no avail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I am trying to negotiate to allow LT to be unblocked so that he can apologize and attempt to mitigate some of the damage he's done to the community. But as of now, he apparently wants to continue following the [[User:Conservative]]/[[Rationalwiki]] school of [[trolling]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:38, September 30, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::T. and you have been very patient when he embarked in July 2024 with his sick upside-down language, including weird tantrum like obsession in using the word &amp;quot;nazi&amp;quot; always when it's the contrary. Who convinced him that if he repeats his garbage again and again he won't lose more respect? Of course he was never about facts, truth, history or even being honest.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:05, September 30, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::He learned that from Senior Admin [[User:Conservative]]: When called out on improper conduct and incivility, he doubles down on [[malicious trolling]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:55, September 30, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== He blames the Jews for Hitler ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''L'''ying '''T'''roll still blames[https://web.archive.org/web/20240930234716/https://i.ibb.co/Lv2479H/IMG-20240930-WA0006.jpg] the Jews for Hitler, and he is the one using the nazi term on others. We also remember him promoting a self declared fascist as a &amp;quot;source.&amp;quot; (Besides, as T. pointed out above [https://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:LT#Jesus_studied_Kaballah_.5Bsecular.5D_zionists_did_not._Plus_bigotry_pattern_here.]  his pseudo references/sources how he misuses, deceives.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 20:16, September 30, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Some months ago I attempted to do [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:AFD_Essay:Russian_war_crimes_in_Ukraine&amp;amp;diff=1990332&amp;amp;oldid=1990330 a poll on building acceptable community standards], but due to the incessant [[trolling]] by a Senior Admin, the whole thing degenerated into a series of more [[personal attacks]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Just for the record, I didn't know 'oriental' is offensive to some before a forwarded email. (And of course, needless to say, I have no intolerance to any 'race'). Asian is important in the context of an Asian adopting David Duke rants Or/and as T. pointed out copying Holocaust deniar the Arab Issa Nakhle linked site garbage. And With his upside-down terminology or/and word salad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And about his dirty [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:LT&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2078322] language on me. Not all Jews look like the nazi cartoons he seems to like. Some even look like &amp;quot;aryans&amp;quot;.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:21, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, Rob. Long time no see.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oldest trick in the book is to commit a crime, and then blame someone else for it. This gives the criminal three advantages:&lt;br /&gt;
#They get the pleasure of blaming someone else, while looking good themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
#They get away with the crime.&lt;br /&gt;
#They get to hurt another person.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good people don't do this. It's a violation of the [[Judeo-Christian]] tradition. (Of course, you already know this ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:29, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*God bless you Ed Poor.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RobS is actually againt this LT behavior. &lt;br /&gt;
It's LT who blames Jews for Hitler, not RobS.&lt;br /&gt;
This is about LT, he just pasted it all from his talk page on to here.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:38, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks Dianne. This confusion arises because Andy allows [[User:Conservative]] to abuse his user talk page, so discussions and comments get moved and posted elsewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 05:16, October 6, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Un&amp;quot;Holy&amp;quot; hate ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On top of using Holocaust related terms only as slurs and only on those of the nation - victim of it, he invoked 'Judas' on a Christian - Oct 1, 2024.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 12:42, October 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 1.5 million Holocaust victims were murdered by Einsatzgruppen (this is asides from Gas chambers) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before Hamas filmed Oct. 7 attacks, Nazis recorded Holocaust massacres in Ukraine.&lt;br /&gt;
1.5 million Holocaust victims were murdered by Einsatzgruppen.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In an interview with The Times of Israel, Hewitt said he knew about trains to death camps with gas chambers, but he had not known about SS firing squads (Einsatzgruppen) supported by local collaborators until recently.&amp;quot;[https://www.timesofisrael.com/before-hamas-filmed-oct-7-attacks-nazis-recorded-holocaust-massacres-in-ukraine/ History]. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 23:07, October 5, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;local collaborators&amp;quot;, i.e. [[Polish|Pole]]s, [[Lithuanian]]s, [[Ukrainian]]s, etc. This is a truth the peoples of the former Soviet Union have lived with everyday since that people of [[the West]] have no idea about. [https://youtu.be/SKfGEXwFf9A Come and See] is a must see movie any serious student needs to see. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:47, October 6, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Yup. And, they were not 'forced' to do what they did, as others were... if they wished to survive at all, or their families. As well as using any desperate measures -- one should never abuse to defame them. But that nazi propaganda pusher&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; (with Marxist or neo Nazi sources or Neo Nazis worker Holocaust denier Cabadian Fuhrer Arcand's buddy Issa Nakhkeh linked fkd up site) before he camouflages and/or conflates)&amp;lt;b&amp;gt; likes to blame &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;only&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; the victims. Worse, he makes Hitler and the nazis as &amp;quot;victims,&amp;quot; by the boogeyman - he loves to invoke dark sentiments like &amp;quot;Rothschild&amp;quot; canards. It's mot just upside-down terminology as Dianne pointed out, but falsifying the entire picture. And all is under his &amp;quot;good Christian&amp;quot; w/ real nazi hatred pushing.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To elevate the Nazis when (years before final solution decree) they sought (in words/deed) to expel (first) the (already persecuted) Jews to make Germany 100% aryan --&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
to be with those that sought to save  them in Israel Palestine as the &amp;quot;same&amp;quot; level,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is not just cynic but cruel.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:12, October 6, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::LyingTroll could have said the simple truth that Hitler, Nazi leadership were bad Christians. And despite using Christian symbolism they have actually  persecuted Christians too. There were many good Christians in Germany. The exact opposite of (M.) '''L'''ying'''T'''roll.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 09:44, October 6, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Look at the number of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schutzmannschaft Schutzmannshaft in the Wikipedia entry] - most were Ukrainian. &amp;quot;Everywhere, local police far outnumbered the equivalent German personnel several times; in most places, the ratio of Germans to natives was about 1-to-10.&amp;quot; These were the people who brought Nazi rule and order to [[Eastern Europe]]. Even the Germans were shocked by their cruelty. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:45, October 6, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::About some Polish propaganda wikipedians see: [https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hksrnqlts small group of actors hijacks Holocaust-related entries on online encyclopedia to whitewash role of Polish society in genocide and bolster stereotypes about Jews].&lt;br /&gt;
Though the overwhelming fault about all [[WW2]] crimes first lies at the German Nazi machine, Rob has a very valid point about Ukrainians specifically. It has been told that Ukrainian [[Antisemitism|antisemites]] told the German Nazis, we could do it ourselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The point about some of SS and about Ukrainian haters was the sadistic upclose 'personal' cruelty. Which is why Holocaust survivors/children in Israel (some were victims of) [[Oct 7|Oct7 War]] have been having flashbacks and had shocked the traumatic nation. One was even a child at the 1941 [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rknnKYP5Iqg Farhoud pogrom by Nazi-Arab alliance]] instigated by the palestine pan-[[Arab]] Pan [[Islam|Islamic]] leader, [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Nazis_Islamists_and_the_Making_of_the_Mo/qCXBAgAAQBAJ?hl=en&amp;amp;gbpv=1&amp;amp;dq=hitler+arabs+rubin&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover Hitler's Mufti].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 11:54, October 6, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:As to [[Wikipedia]], IMO, Polish (and Ukrainian) [[fascist]]s hope to join [[NATO]] to maintain their status as &amp;quot;victim&amp;quot; and whitewash their complicity with Nazism. Back in the early days of WP there was an effort by Polish nationalists to change names everywhere in WP of cities with large Polish populations using the Latin alphabet. Dresden became Dresno and Dnipropetrovsk (Latinized Russian spelling) from Ukrainian Dnepr (Latinized Ukrainian spelling) to Dniepro (Polish spelling).&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Volodymyr Zelensky, Justin Trudeau, and Chrystia Freeland applaud Yaroslav Hunka of the Waffen SS Galicia Division during a session of the Canadian Parliament September 24 2023.PNG|right|300|thumb|In one of the most sickening things I have ever personally witnessed in my life [[Volodymyr Zelensky]], [[Justin_Trudeau#Support_for_Nazism|Justin Trudeau]], and [[Chrystia Freeland]] applaud Yaroslav Hunka of the [[Waffen SS Galicia Division]] during a session of the Canadian Parliament, September 24, 2023. [[Vladimir Putin]] mentioned the appalling event in his interview with [[Tucker Carlson]]. [[Belarus]] demanded Hunka's extradition from [[Canada]] to stand trial for [[Nazi]] [[war crime]]s.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:The root cause of this is Angelo-American anti-German [[war propaganda]] from [[World War II]], much of which has been maintained in history books. The facts are every nation of Europe fought under the Nazi flag against the Soviet Union, and Soviet Union after 1945 had a large population of Nazis in its midst in Ukraine. The Soviets did not seek to exterminate them in the same way Nazis dealt with their designated enemies. [[The West]] took advantage of this, and the [[CIA]] was formed to aid Ukrainian Nazis. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:08, October 6, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The war in Ukraine is leading to the Ukrainization of America, with [[corruption]] rampant and loss of [[free speech]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:17, October 6, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::By guilty Nazi Germany first and foremost, I refer to: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Producing a European 'death machine' targeting any ethnically Jew.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Propaganda: Goebbels  office, Sturmer cartoons, invoking the old &amp;quot;Protocols&amp;quot; forgery and Hitler's Mein Kampf which were distributed in these countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW, Arab-Palestine sought out these dangerous garbage literature and theories. Such as Jamal Husseini ordering both books. And being Mein Kampf a best seller in 1937 by anti Zionist Arab Palestine crowd.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:50, October 6, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The point I'm making is the WWII Angelo-American war propaganda that Nazism was exclusively German was a myth then, and a myth now, perpetrated by [[Hollywood]] and American history books. In so-call &amp;quot;Nazi-occupied&amp;quot; France, Poland, the Baltics, Ukraine &amp;amp; elsewhere, the Germans had no problem finding willing volunteers to do the dirty work while the Germans directed and supervised. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It was left to the Russians and Soviet apparatus to sort things out among the Nazi war criminals and collaborators who remained and did not escape to [[the West]], the [[UK]], [[Canada]], and the [[United States]], some 20,000 were granted citizenship, and continued a covert war in the [[Cold War]] sponsored by [[NATO]] and the [[CIA]]. These facts were taught in both Soviet and now in Russian Federation elementary school history books, but are virtually unknown in the US. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:06, October 7, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Re Harris bragging on money to Lebanon  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Re [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=2079377 this]. Did you see KPJ vs Doocy exchange[https://www.foxnews.com/media/karine-jean-pierre-leaves-briefing-after-doocy-questions-lebanon-funding-during-hurricane-season]? ([https://www.conservapedia.com/File:%27You_can%27t_call_a_question_you_don%27t_like_misinformation,%27_Doocy_said_to_WH%27s_KJP.jpg])[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:59, October 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Questions you don't like are not misinformation&amp;quot; - that's one for the ages. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:31, October 8, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Always remember these words of the international relations scholar John Mearsheimer who you have cited on main page right several times.  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Russia is not a great power. It is obviously a declining power.&amp;quot; - International relations scholar John Mearsheimer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Russia is a declining power, and it will only get weaker with time.&amp;quot; - John Mearsheimer &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I trust this clarifies matters. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:19, October 10, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. Heard it before - from Mearsheimer - years ago. Thanks again. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I know it's an important discovery for you. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:24, October 10, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::You heard it before? I very much doubt this. Russia's currently economic decline and its significant risk of stagflation appears to have caught you with your pants down. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:26, October 10, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Doubt all you want. Who gives a rip? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:28, October 10, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::You obviously do. {{prr}} [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:31, October 10, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanx. God bless you. Is that all you do, [[gossip]] about editors?[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Justutin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:33, October 10, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
W&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please stop adding unsourced content ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have lost all of your credibility after you denied that [[Pathetic Putin]] is a [[dictator]] and [[murder]]er. You need to cite every single word that comes out of your mouth. Feel free to call me a &amp;quot;troll&amp;quot; if that makes you feel better. [[User:MayGodBless|MayGodBless]] ([[User talk:MayGodBless|talk]]) 01:19, October 26, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. Will try. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:46, October 26, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MSNBC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This [https://rumble.com/v5kebsi-msnbc-plays-clip-of-nazi-rally-from-1939-when-covering-trumps-msg-rally.html] is infuriating. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:38, October 27, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's a risk Trump took. It's hard to believe no one told him this would happen. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:20, October 27, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::MSNBC is now the sole channel on major TV who broadcast depressed and dark drama 24/7.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 21:32, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's hard to believe they're commercially viable. Must be subsidized from somewhere. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:59, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::(Maybe a Soros group? Today an anchor promoted ACLU, having Cecilia Wang on, that they need help to counter Trump immigration agenda. Meantime the two radical pro Palestine propagandists Islamists: Ayman Mohyeldin and Ali Velshi speak about &amp;quot;racism&amp;quot; ironically...). The reason I watched a bit there is to see the frustration on the other side.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 21:51, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lying Troll seems to have a palestinNazi pal... ==&lt;br /&gt;
The same coin upsidedown sh#t. He is an avid Muslim who complains about &amp;quot;toxic masculinity&amp;quot;.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:05, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This stuff is spiraling out of control. Clearly, there is a large element out there who believe &amp;quot;Nazi&amp;quot; pr &amp;quot;Nazism&amp;quot; is just a modern day insult, without any understanding whatsoever what Nazis &amp;amp; Nazism is. Sadly, it is modern [[social media]] and the so-called &amp;quot;[[Godwin's Law]]&amp;quot; that contributed to it. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:16, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Of course propagandists using it as an insult. Even white supremacists use it against Jews (LT's ORIGINAL sources). '''They've tried it on Trump.  But failed''' [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:24, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::In reading LT's stuff, it's obvious that's all he thinks those terms are - insults. He has little or no understanding of any of the terms, Nazi or Zionist, origin and meaning. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:29, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::He has longtime been obsessed with labels. Everything has to fit within his neatly pre-packed design of various labels (see [[Old Right]] or [[U.S. &amp;quot;Party-switch&amp;quot; myth]]). I have tried to warn him about the use and misuse of labels, to no avail.  It only gets worse. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:32, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sad.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 01:43, November 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Georgia... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Rob. Re [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Mainpageright&amp;amp;curid=123765&amp;amp;diff=2089246&amp;amp;oldid=2089245 this] It's Georgia. The country.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:17, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yah thanks. I try to be careful about the [[Republic of Georgia]] vs the [[State of Georgia]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:21, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Correct.  I saw the red link so I commented to fix it as I don't have access to the MPR.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:58, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== So flattering, yo! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Rob, so flattered to have a user talk page the object of an edit war! See you 'round the campus. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:54, December 2, 2024 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2089718</id>
		<title>Talk:Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;diff=2089718"/>
		<updated>2024-12-02T14:24:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Biden admits selective prosecution?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This page is for intelligent discussion only related to Main Page content! We are attempting to better coordinate editors&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; for collaborative input on MPR news reporting. Non-MSM sources can be qualified for MPR use here. Please place your&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; contribution on the appropriate thread for other editors to participate and discuss. This will help focus priority content for&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; inclusion on MPR. If you think the item you are sharing does not fit on an existing topic thread, feel free to create a new thread&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; at the bottom of the page. Our intent is to promote discussion and get readers and editors eyes off programmed MSM [[collective]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; herd [[brainwashing]], and to develop more of a consensus editorial stance among [[conservative]]s for wider distribution. We decide&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; what is news, not what is spoon fed us by the MSM. All other off-topic discussions, suggestions, socializing, frivolous rants,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; rehashing MSM garbage and [[spam]] should be posted at the&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; '''[[Conservapedia:Community Portal]]'''.''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Talk:Main Page/Archive index]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ok, Mr. Analyst==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.newsweek.com/war-ukraine-putin-emerges-potential-peace-broker-middle-east-1977721 At War in Ukraine, Putin Emerges as Potential Peace Broker in Middle East].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.bizpacreview.com/2024/10/23/unhinged-bob-woodward-calls-for-biden-to-get-nobel-peace-prize-for-ukraine-1497033/ Bob Woodward calls for Biden to get Nobel Peace Prize for Ukraine].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We need [[User:Conservative]]'s input. [[Bob Woodward]], of &amp;quot;Trump is Hitler&amp;quot; fame, wants to nominate [[Joe Biden]] for the [[Nobel Peace Prize]] cause Biden only got 500,000 [[subhuman]] [[Slav]]s killed while avoiding having any [[American]]s killed in starting [[World War III]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meanwhile, the world pins its hopes on the evil [[corrupt]] [[kleptocrat]] [[Vladimir Putin]] to avoid a full scale World War III. Like [[Trump]], Putin stands no chance of winning the Nobel Prize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One thing Woodward did get right: Yes Virginia, there are [[Nazi]]s in the modern day [[conservative movement]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:36, November 1, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No answer. I declare victory. ''USA! USA! USA! Ole! Ole! Ole! Death to Fascism!''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:33, November 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why are you calling for an analysts in this matter? Just read the article you cited. It says that Russia is a &amp;quot;potential player&amp;quot; when it comes to peace keeping and &amp;quot;Uncertainties surround Moscow's capacity to play an effective role as it contends with a war of its own in Ukraine.&amp;quot;[https://www.newsweek.com/war-ukraine-putin-emerges-potential-peace-broker-middle-east-1977721] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:48, November 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Some additional analysis. Given Donald Trump's success at maintaining peace in the Middle East during his presidency and given the election betting markets favoring Trump winning the 2024 presidential elections ([https://electionbettingodds.com/ 54.6% chance of winning the 2024 election]), it does appear that Trump is a more likely to aid the Middle East being more peaceful than Vladimir Putin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The Middle East has been a powderkeg and/or potential powderkeg ever since the establishment of Israel and even before if you count the Crusades. So peace in the Middle East is obviously a long-term project. So what is Russia's role in terms of the long-term peace in the Middle East? That is highly unknown. Why? [https://decline-of-russia.blogspot.com/2024/11/will-russia-become-failed-state-is.html Almost half of global strategists think Russia could become a failed state within the next 10 years], Fortune magazine, January 23, 2023.  For additional information, please see: [https://decline-of-russia.blogspot.com/2024/11/will-russia-become-failed-state-is.html Will Russia become a failed state within 10 years? Is Russia currently a failed state? Will Russia eventually become a failed state?]   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Furthermore, &amp;quot;Britannica explained that a failed state is the one that “cannot protect its national boundaries.” April 26, 2023 head of the Russian Committee of defense of the Russian State Duma suggested that Russian citizens should be mobilized to protect Russian borders acknowledging that Russia has no resources for that, comparing the current inability of the state to the previous mighty USSR.&amp;quot; - [https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/05/03/russia-has-failed-as-a-state/ Russia has failed as a state], Modern Diplomacy, 2023. Ukraine's invasion of the Russian area of Kursk further demonstrates Russia's current struggle as far as protecting its borders (1,000 square miles of Russian land seized by Ukrainian military units). So Russia has its hands full in terms of its governmental bandwidth given the war in Ukraine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::With the above being said, [https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/04/economy/israel-economy-war-impact/index.html Israel’s economy is paying a high price for its widening war]. So there is an incentive for Israel to be at peace as soon as possible from an economic point of view. Therefore, Russia certainly has the potential to aid peace in the Middle East.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:44, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::America is a failed state? I'll remember that &amp;quot;for the foreseeable future&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:57, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::To the best of my knowledge, neither Canada or Mexico has conquered 1,000 square miles of the USA like Ukraine did in Kursk, Russia. Furthermore, Trump is favored to win the 2024 election and he vows to build additional border wall and greatly reduce illegal immigration. He also vows to engage in some deportation which would skim off some of the worst illegal immigrants in the USA (Criminals, terrorists, etc.). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:07, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Besides the &amp;quot;Britannica argument&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;Kursk argument&amp;quot; given above, the website ModernDiplomacy.eu does give other arguments that Russia is a failed state (See: [https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/05/03/russia-has-failed-as-a-state/ Russia has failed as a state], Modern Diplomacy, 2023). But the stronger argument can be made that for a number of reasons the Russian Federation could become a failed state in the next 10-20 years (See: [https://decline-of-russia.blogspot.com/2024/11/will-russia-become-failed-state-is.html Will Russia become a failed state within 10 years? Is Russia currently a failed state? Will Russia eventually become a failed state?]). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:10, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::You said yourself, America is a failed state. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Another reason why Russia could become a failed state due to the &amp;quot;Britannica argument/Kursk argument&amp;quot; given above, here is some additional data that bolsters this particular argument (Inability to protect its national boundaries): [https://www.rt.com/news/606884-trump-divide-russia-china/ Trump promises to drive wedge between Russia and China], Source: Russia Today website, November 3, 2024 (Key quote in article: “We united them because of the oil. Biden united them. It’s a shame,” he added, without elaborating. ”I'm going to have to un-unite them, and I think I can do that too.”). Trump claimed that the USA is going to &amp;quot;drill, baby, drill&amp;quot; if he wins the election. This would help loosen the informal alliance between China/Russia as it would lower the price of oil in the world and Russia's oil is more expensive to extract than American/Saudi oil[https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/11/12/russian-oil-production-most-expensive-world-saudi-aramco-ipo-a68132] (In addition, Russia's oil production faces various risks in terms of future oil production, see: [https://decline-of-russia.blogspot.com/2024/11/how-stable-is-russian-oil-industry.html How stable is Russian oil production?].  And the Saudis indicate that they are going to raise their oil production[https://www.newsweek.com/saudi-arabia-ramp-oil-production-blow-putin-1959817][https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/saudi-arabia-abandon-100-crude-target-take-back-market-share-ft-reports-2024-09-26/]). If Trump is successful in &amp;quot;un-uniting China/Russia&amp;quot;, consider this: &amp;quot;While these articles emphasize that Taiwan is China’s primary focus in its bid to reclaim territories lost during the Opium War of 1840-42, this does not imply that Beijing has abandoned the idea of reclaiming “lost territories” from Russia.&amp;quot;[https://www.eurasiantimes.com/china-russia-border-war-when-moscow/]  See also: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iibs7buNwxQ Why Russia's Biggest Threat is Actually China]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:26, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Another related point related to Russia's inability to protect its national boundaries: Russia recently had a major terrorist attack due to foreign terrorists - not the USA. See: [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2024/03/28/us-warned-russia-terrorist-attack-concert-shooting/73130550007/ US says it warned Russia 'in writing' about threat before ISIS concert shooting in Moscow]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:16, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I retract the terrorist argument above. The majority of the terrorists appear to have been Russian, Muslim citizens. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:00, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::What terrorist argument? I, like most people, didn't read it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::And you can't even get that right: What's the difference between a Russian Muslim citizen and Muslim Russian citizen? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:04, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:Conservative]]: '''&amp;quot;America is a failed state that will remain the leading power in the world for the foreseeable futue&amp;quot;.''' It's a wonder you even take yourself seriously.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What's confusing, if not outright offensive, is the way you disrespect non-Americans - even [[NATO]] allies: [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_The_Conservapedia_atheism_article_is_currently_receiving_about_11,110_page_views_a_month._And_it_is_merely_one_of_the_1,900%2B_atheism_related_articles_at_Conservapedia.&amp;amp;oldid=1824003#You_tried_to_strike_me_down_UK_atheists.2C_but_as_a_God-fearing_child_of_the_Almighty_I_am_still_far_greater_than_your_all_godless_countrymen_whose_country_has_greatly_declined_since_WWII._I_laugh_at_your_pothole_filled_country_that_is_the_fountainhead_of_Darwinism._Britain_has_been_called_the_.22fat_man_of_Europe.22 &amp;quot;You tried to strike me down UK atheists, but as a God-fearing child of the Almighty I am still far greater than your all godless countrymen whose country has greatly declined since WWII. I laugh at your pothole filled country that is the fountainhead of Darwinism. Britain has been called the &amp;quot;fat man of Europe&amp;quot;]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:47, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;Britannica explained that a failed state is the one that “cannot protect its national boundaries.”[https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/05/03/russia-has-failed-as-a-state/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::The operative word is &amp;quot;cannot&amp;quot;. The USA can protect its national boundaries. That is why Donald Trump is likely to be reelected. And if he is elected, he is going to finish building a wall that has a big beautiful door of legal immigration that Mexico will indirectly pay for via a renegotiated trade agreement. And he will probably get the Mexicans to guard their border more diligently like he did the first time he was elected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::On the other hand, Ukraine's invasion of Kursk and &amp;quot;the head of the Russian Committee of defense of the Russian State Duma suggested that Russian citizens should be mobilized to protect Russian borders acknowledging that Russia has no resources for that, comparing the current inability of the state to the previous mighty USSR.&amp;quot; (See: [https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/05/03/russia-has-failed-as-a-state/ Russia has failed as a state], Modern Diplomacy, 2023.) both show that Russia is not able to control its borders. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:27, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Furthermore, the Russian demographer Salavat Abylkalikov says the main consequences of Russia's demographic crisis will be the following: &amp;quot;A smaller population means a country's lower economic potential, a shrinking domestic market, worsening demographic problems and an aging population, as well as a decrease in the country's geopolitical power. The population size still correlates with the weight in international relations, the ability to promote their interests on the world stage. And the declining population for the largest country in the world may cause some neighbors on the continent, especially the eastern ones, to be tempted to solve their internal growing problems by some external adventures. But will Russia have someone and something to fight back with, will it have allies?&amp;quot;[https://thebell.io/do-kontsa-veka-nas-khvatit-demograf-salavat-abylkalikov--o-tom-vymiraet-li-rossiya-i-chto-s-etim-delat?ref=en.thebell.io] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:34, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You and [[Kamala Harris]] are the Bobbsey Twins - you both take an inordinate amount of words to say nothing. And if by chance a discernible pattern emerges of coherent thought, it contradicts earlier statements. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:59, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, my forecast that Russia would be unable to have a strong &amp;quot;guns and butter&amp;quot; economy is beginning to manifest.  See: [https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/russia-wartime-economy-butter-price-inflation-1.7371742 Butter prices soar in Russia amid surging inflation in war economy], CBC News, November 2, 2024 and [https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1971365/russian-economy-butter-food-price-inflation-ukraine-war Russia economy meltdown as people steal butter from shopping centres over inflation crisis], ''Express'', November 4, 2024 [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:09, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way regarding your forecast:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|And when they shall say unto you, Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep, and that mutter: should not a people seek unto their God? for the living to the dead?|||Is. 8:19}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:13, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Holy cow! My studying of forecasting principles looks to be paying off as far as my guns and butter prediction relating to Russia's economy: [https://www.newsweek.com/russians-resort-stealing-butter-amid-shortages-1976575 Russians Resort to Stealing Butter Amid Shortages]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The shortages in the country stem from a combination of supply chain disruptions, Western sanctions, and declining domestic production. As reported by state-owned news outlet Moskow 24, large butter-making enterprises have begun to reduce production and suspend shipments of their products to retail chains.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One production company cited 46 percent cumulative inflation for eight months of 2024 compared to the same period in 2023, partly due to aggressive inflation costs of raw cream. Prices for dairy items, including butter, have soared this year, per the report. The price of the butter itself has soared by 55 percent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Import restrictions on some dairy products and the ruble's steep depreciation have only intensified the squeeze on household goods like butter. Economists point to continued inflation compounded by global food shortages as further exacerbating Russia's economic challenges.&amp;quot;[https://www.newsweek.com/russians-resort-stealing-butter-amid-shortages-1976575] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:31, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You've had your sugar fix for today (without answering why [[Biden]] should be given the [[Nobel Prize]] for slaughtering 500,000 [[Ukraine]]s and why [[Putin]] is asked to be a [[peace]] mediator, and not Biden or [[Blinken]]). Go do something productive with your life, and lay off your pretense to being an analyst, forecaster and expert of the [[Nazi]] [[pseudoscience]] of [[geopolitics]] (then again, maybe its not a pretense). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:29, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Did Biden slaughter 500,000 Ukrainians?  That's a political opinion and certainly not a fact. Biden didn't force Putin to do his February 2020 invasion that violated Just War Theory. Putin let that horse out of the barn and now he is living with a war of attrition that is harming Russia's present and future. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 20:46, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Judging from your answers, you evidently are in agreement with [[Bob Woodward]] (and [[Lindsey Graham]]) - anyone living outside the [[United States]] is a [[subhuman]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You're off on the wrong foot in your studies of [[diplomacy]]. And if [[Trump]] does take office in January, the world ''will'' change from what you think it is now, and what you've expressed [[hope]] for it to be. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:58, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Russia's invasion of Ukraine and plans for a guns and butter economy was a crazy decision. More recent data: [https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/107123/ Russian farmers lack 65,000 tractors, 34,000 combine harvesters - AgMin], Interfax, 2024 and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaTqnIS9MVk Russia's Import Substitution Fiasco: Domestic Production Fails]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Get out of your Russian propaganda and hyper Russophile news bubble before you have more egg on your face. You were definitely wrong about Russia's decision to have a guns and butter economy and it turning out well. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:09, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::You, like [[Adolf Hitler]], [[Antony Blinken]], [[Lloyd Austin]], [[Jake Sullivan]], [[Biden]] and tens of millions of [[Kamala]] [[voter]]s, will learn to respect the [[Russian]] [[military]] before this all over.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::One more time, [[Pelageya]]. [https://youtu.be/SgXH00kvqkQ When We Were At War]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:19, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I though you were a student of [[Mearsheimer]] and [[realist]]. Biden slaughtered 500,000 Ukrainians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Get out of you [[LGBT]] [[liberal democracy]] bubble. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:35, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Obama]] brought the &amp;quot;change you can believe in&amp;quot; - [[gay marriage]] - and the world is reacting against it, Mr. Realist. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:38, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::RobSmith, are there gay bars/clubs/saunas in St. Petersburg and Moscow which are two of the most influential cities in Russia?  Is there a set of &amp;quot;Central Station&amp;quot; gay clubs with locations in both Moscow and St. Petersburg? Is the Cabaret Club the oldest gay night club in St. Petersburg, Russia?  Was a Russian IP address to a gay dating app found to be associated with the Kremlin?[https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/jun/13/gay-putin-moscow-life-nightlife-clubbing-law-lgbt] [https://www.insidermonkey.com/blog/25-straightest-countries-in-the-world-1242110/4/ Kenya is straighter than Russia] so feature that country more than Russia on main page right. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:57, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:Conservative]]: There are [[gay]] bars in [[Buffalo, New York]]. The city suffers from high rates of [[AIDS]], [[divorce]], and [[alcoholism]]. The city's long term [[demographic]] crisis has only been reversed by both legal and [[illegal immigration]]. No amount of [[liberal claptrap]], like &amp;quot;affordable&amp;quot; cost of living flowing from the lips of its [[Democrat]] mayor can hide the fact it is a liberal hellhole. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:33, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Does Buffalo, NY suffer from high rates of AIDS, divorce and alcoholism? You have yet to find sources for those contentions. And if what you contend is true, then why was Buffalo recently ranked for having the highest percentage of native inhabitants in the USA? [https://stepoutbuffalo.com/see-where-buffalo-ranks-among-u-s-cities-with-the-most-native-residents/] And why are people flocking to the USA and fleeing Russia?[https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Top_12_reasons_why_people_are_flocking_to_the_USA_and_leaving_the_corrupt,_authoritarian_countries_of_China_and_Russia]  Russia has an AIDS epidemic so severe that it ran out of AIDS medication.[https://www.dw.com/en/russia-faces-shortage-of-hiv-aids-drugs/a-67632628] Russia ranks #1 for countries as far as its rate of alcoholism.[https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/alcohol-consumption-by-country]  And in 2023, Russia was ranked #1 as far as having the highest divorce rate in the world.[https://mb.cision.com/Main/20322/3747396/1969923.pdf]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And barring a miracle, I do agree with this quote: &amp;quot;Russia is a declining power, and it will only get weaker with time.&amp;quot; - International relations scholar [[John Mearsheimer]] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:47, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:By the way, my favorite barber is a lady by the name of Casey who emigrated from Russia. And the best physician I ever had also emigrated from Russia. The USA does attract talented immigrants.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:04, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::What? Are you bored? Get yourself a dog.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Why are you obsessed with me, another man?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You, as an international traveler, check out the names, location, and history of [[gay bethhouse]]s in cities you plan to visit. I note, you mentioned your plans to visit [[St. Petersburg, Russia]]. You already know the address and location of the Cabaret Club, the oldest [[gay]] night club in St. Petersburg. Good luck to you. Stop bothering me with your personal problems. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:01, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::RobSmith, you are the one who invited me to this thread. Who is the one with the obsession? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::And after Donald Trump is elected and the USA ramps up oil production (along with the Saudis), and raises tariffs on China (who buys Russian oil), Russia will be so far behind the USA when it comes to great power competition that France may overtake Russia in its great/major power ranking in the foreseeable future! No country is currently breaching France's border. France certainly has a higher fertility rate than Russia and it's not bogged down in a war of attrition that is highly inflationary and may lead to stagflation. You might as well face it. Marine Le Pen has more machismo than Putin! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:20, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''Breaking News:''''' of special interest to [[User:Conservative]]. I know you have lived a sheltered life, what, being a special needs person attending a special needs school where you got beat up by godless [[public school]] kids and now harbor a special animosity toward people you consider [[secular]] or [[atheist]], so they might not have had time beyond the 3Rs to teach you this in school. But here's the news: Wherever you have [[human being]]s, there is [[homosexuality]]. In 10,000 years or 40,000,000,000 years or whatever, the human race has not stomped out this [[sin]]. If the human species ever were to colonize [[Mars]] as some people dream, there will be homosexuality on Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know this news is a shock to you. If you read about gay bars and bath houses in Russia, what does that mean? It means Russia has a free press now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now, can we put to rest your obsession with gay bath houses anywhere on the planet? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:France is ranked #21 in its GNI (PPP) per capita and Russia is ranked #46.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GNI_(PPP)_per_capita].  Russia is ranked high among the countries that millionaries are fleeing in 2024[https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-millionaire-migration-in-2024/], but the same cannot be said of France.  The French have more business machismo than the Russians. And their food is better too. Russian cuisine is not ranked among the best in the world, but France's is. Move to Russia RobSmith so you can eat a lot of potatoes and cabbage that are sold at inflationary prices! [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:36, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::How you convert a discussion about a demented psycho killer like [[Joe Biden]] being nominated for the [[Nobel Peace Prize]] while the [[US]] is ignored in [[peace]] talks, into a discussion on [[gay bath houses]] in [[St. Petersburg]] which you plan to visit, is beyond me. You earn a 10 minute block for [[trolling]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:44, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::RobSmith, as much as I hate to say it, it's time for you to whip out the hide template again because you suffered yet another thoroughly embarrassing debate beatdown comeuppance. And it wasn't due to my debating prowess. It was due to the utter weakness of your hyper Russiaphilia position.  You might as well face it. The writing is on wall. Russia is going to keep declining - just as I and John Mearsheimer predicted! &amp;quot;Russia is a declining power, and it will only get weaker with time.&amp;quot; - International relations scholar John Mearsheimer. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:52, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Now, France, with its subpar birth rate and flood of [[illegal migrant]]s who came there to &amp;quot;improve its quality of life&amp;quot; like in [[Buffalo, New York]], [[User:Conservative]], makes another forecast. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:00, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
My challenge still stands. [https://sites.google.com/view/my-challenge-to-robsmith/home My challenge to RobSmith given on August 11, 2024 concerning Russia].  Are you willing to take me up on my challenge or are you still quaking inside your self-imposed Russian propaganda and hyper Russophilia fake news cacoon? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 00:23, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I told you yesterday you and I are not engaged in any debate or discussion. You have been reverting my efforts to share information with you for over a dozen years. Yes, I invited you here this one time to get your take on the demented psycho Joe Biden being nominated for the Nobel Prize while Putin is invited to mediate peace talks, and you spewed your obsession with [[gay bath house]]s and how [[illegal migrant]]s improve the &amp;quot;quality of life&amp;quot; in France &amp;amp; Buffalo. You earn a 10 minute block for nonsense and [[trolling]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You have the political sense of [[Kamala Harris]]. Stick with what you like best, [[gay bathhouse]]s. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:20, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Report Exposes Joe Biden, Kamala Harris Alliance with United Nations to ‘Fast-Track’ Migrants into U.S ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/11/01/exclusive-bombshell-report-exposes-joe-biden-kamala-harris-alliance-with-united-nations-to-fast-track-migrants-into-u-s/ Exclusive: Bombshell Report Exposes Joe Biden, Kamala Harris Alliance with United Nations to ‘Fast-Track’ Migrants into U.S.].  And the very &amp;quot;czar&amp;quot; is running to be Prez.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:Another report says the UN will send Peacekeepers to stop the [[Biden Harris junta]] &amp;amp; [[military]] from firing on [[Trump]] supporters when the newly-elected Dem House (with [[fraud]]ulent ballots) fails to certify Trump in the electoral collage and [[Kamala]], as presiding officer, declares herself president. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:27, November 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
_&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW Another subject:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://justthenews.com/government/congress/sathouse-speaker-lays-out-massive-deportation-plan-moving-bureaucrats-dc House Speaker lays out massive deportation plan: moving bureaucrats from DC to reshape government][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:51, November 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Harris Campaign Rally: Joe Biden Says He Wants to ‘Smack’ Trump’s ‘Ass’ ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Harris Campaign Rally: Joe Biden Says He Wants to ‘Smack’ Trump’s ‘Ass’&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/11/02/harris-campaign-rally-joe-biden-says-he-wants-to-smack-trumps-ass/] Very &amp;quot;nice&amp;quot; Kamala...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:57, November 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Ol' Scranton 'Scrap Yard' Joe still at it. Amazing, how [[dementia]] still doesn't change a person's underlying habits and disposition. &lt;br /&gt;
: And if that pencil neck geek ever got begind the barn or the gym with Trump, Trump would wup his hazz. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:20, November 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;quot;underlying habits and disposition,&amp;quot; exactly right.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:38, November 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Deplorables&amp;quot; Cont. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 2:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://nypost.com/2024/10/31/us-news/after-biden-calls-trump-supporters-garbage-top-surrogate-suggests-women-around-trump-weak/?utm_source=twitter&amp;amp;utm_campaign=nypost&amp;amp;utm_medium=social After Biden calls Trump voters ‘garbage,’ Harris campaign says women around Trump are weak, dumb][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:50, November 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Kamala's forked tongue about &amp;quot;bringing people together.&amp;quot;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 03:01, November 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Hochul jumps on the bandwagon[https://nypost.com/2024/11/03/us-news/kathy-hochul-calls-trump-gop-voters-anti-american-and-anti-women/] [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 22:26, November 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== White supremacist Richard Spencer supports Harris b/c he's Anti-Israel (naturally) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
White supremacist endorses Harris&lt;br /&gt;
One of the United States’ foremost white supremacists, Richard Spencer, has called for followers to vote for Kamala Harris in the upcoming elections.&lt;br /&gt;
Israel National News. Nov 3, 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
'''According to Spencer, Harris is the “best manager of the American empire” because she seems &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;unlikely to support Israel&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;.'''&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/398540][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 06:27, November 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Harris' Godwin's law...&lt;br /&gt;
BTW She was [https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/11/kamala_was_raised_as_a_marxist.html raised socialist]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:02, November 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If I were Trump, I wouldn't trash talk her father. He did enough to disown her for calling Jamaicans a bunch of pleasure seeking drug addicts (&amp;quot;your grandmothers would be rolling over in their graves&amp;quot;) at a crucial moment leading up to the [[Iowa caucus]]es. It's not every day a parent sabotages their child's effort to become President of the United States.  Her father &amp;amp; [[Tulsi]] are on the same song sheet. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:09, November 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Nor has the Harris campaign played the Mary L. Card.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 12:38, November 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IMHO: If Harris wins, it's because...  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of one issue: Abortion. '''Intimating women''' - rather. Not for any other major issue.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:11, November 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I doubt Harris will win. The [https://atlasintel.org/media/atlasintel-is-confirmed-as-the-most-accurate-pollster-of-the-2020-presidential-election most reliable polling companies in 2020] predict [https://www.realclearpolling.com/polls/president/general/2024/pennsylvania/trump-vs-harris Trump winning the 2024 election in the swing states] and the political betting markets favor Trump too[https://electionbettingodds.com/][https://www.realclearpolling.com/betting-odds/2024/president] (Since the 1800s, the political betting markets have only been wrong twice when it comes to presidential elections[https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/07/10/2024-presidential-election-odds/74341823007/]). The conservative [[Steve Turley]] gave [https://www.youtube.com/embed/lnMnwIbvH1Q?si=Sa4aObX5beKi_Fu8&amp;amp;amp;start=3805 some counterarguments to Trump not winning, but he explained why they all seemed very unlikely]. I realize that very unlikely things do happen, so it's not totally impossible that Kamala Harris will win, but it does appear to be unlikely. On the other hand, Harris does have a 46.3% chance of winning according to https://electionbettingodds.com/ which uses a weighted average of all the political betting markets. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Lately, people have been voting against the opposition more when it comes to their sentiments and the Not Kamala Harris sentiments does seem stronger than the anti-Trump sentiment due to her being a vacuous, flipper flopper who doesn't offer any solutions and this is obviously why she mainly does softball interviews that she often flubs. Maybe she has the intellectual capacity to understand issues, but she doesn't do the requisite study of the issues because she is lazy and/or lacks [[intellectual humility]]/curiosity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In addition, this appears to be a change election and the VP Kamala Harris is the establishment. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 23:17, November 3, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::''Telling'', scare tactics work in campaigns. ''Conservative,''  thanks for giving me more hope. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 00:14, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::All we are left with now, is convince and pray.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:15, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Abortion may get some votes in the short term for blue states, but over the long term, it reduces the future voters of blue states. In addition, the existence of red states helps to keep a lid on the potential craziness of blue states because people are able to vote with their feet and move from blue states to red states. Some analysts predict that migration red leaning voters moving to red state will have a significant effect on the presidential elections in 2028. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 05:12, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Harris now has a 44.9% chance of winning the election according to https://electionbettingodds.com/ which uses a weighted average of all the political betting markets. So it has gone slightly down since November 3, 2024 when I last reported the odds at 46.3% chance of winning the 2024 presidential election. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:20, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Another point: door knocking... Harris knocked 807k in PA alone.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:10, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I alluded to [[Steve Turley]] mentioning scenarios where Kamala Harris could win (But he does not think these scenarios are the most likely scenarios that will occur).  Here are the scenarios: [https://www.youtube.com/embed/lnMnwIbvH1Q?si=Sa4aObX5beKi_Fu8&amp;amp;amp;start=3805 Steve Turley: What could go wrong that would cause Kamala Harris to win?]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:50, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Are you also in the view that PA will decide? (19 electoral votes[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:23, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
PA is a very important state in the 2024 election and that is why both campaigns poured a lot of resources into it. But who knows? Maybe Trump will sweep all 7 battleground states. At the end of the day, Trump's appears to be the favorite, but sometimes the favorites don't win in presidential races or horse races. But his odds of winning appear to be good. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:21, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Top experts at most accurate polling company in 2020 and 2022 says Trump's chance of winning is 70% and Kamala's Harris' chance of winning is 30%. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE-CpcJMArI]  Election betting markets say Trump's chance of winning is 58.2 percent [https://electionbettingodds.com/]  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:32, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NBC's SNL equal time case ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So basically their attitude is, &amp;quot;so what?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/nov/3/nbc-admits-giving-kamala-harris-free-air-time-snl-/ Sneaky it was.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:20, November 4, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==It's starting...==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]]'s favorite [[Russia Russia Russia]] hoax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2024/11/russia-pushing-election-fraud-lies-swing-states-us-intelligence-community-says/400814/ Russia is pushing election-fraud lies in swing states, US intelligence community says].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yah, [[Dick Morris]], who helped get [[Bill Clinton]] elected and now supports [[Trump]], is a [[KGB]] agent. [https://www.stopbogusballots.com/]&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:45, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I have thought about matters related to Russia more. [https://www.newsweek.com/russians-resort-stealing-butter-amid-shortages-1976575 ButterGate] and little Ukraine's invasion of Kursk put the last nail in the coffin of taking seriously Russia's various pretentions and national narcissism (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[[Essay: Does Russia have more national narcissism than the USA? How exceptional do Russians think their nation is?]]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;). As a result, I am taking a break from watching the further [https://decline-of-russia.blogspot.com/2024/11/will-russia-become-failed-state-is.html decline of Russia] for a while or interacting with hyper Russophiles. Donald Trump is more likely to become the next US president.[https://electionbettingodds.com/] If he wins, I am going to wait until the end of the term of Donald J. Trump's presidency to see if Russia once again becomes a middle-income country. My challenge still stands (See: [https://sites.google.com/view/my-challenge-to-robsmith/home My challenge to RobSmith given on August 11, 2024 concerning Russia]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please let me know if you embrace reality and want to be a contributor of the blog [https://decline-of-russia.blogspot.com/2024/11/will-russia-become-failed-state-is.html Decline of Russia]. If you take some courses on logic and develop some intellectual humility, I will put in a good word for you. It's not too late. The Russian Federation still exists. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 08:29, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You're a [[Russia hoax]]er just like [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Joe Biden]], and [[Kamala Harris]] who believes any of the [[deep state]] rot published in the [[MSM]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:24, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Lame. Move on and don't contact me further as you have nothing to offer. Sadly, Karajou is entirely right about you.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:57, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Yep. [[User:Conservative]] and [[deep state]] [[globalist]]s are on the same song sheet, and have been so since February 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[https://intelligencecommunitynews.com/russia-steps-up-election-undermining-efforts-ic-says/ Russia steps up election undermining efforts, IC says], intelligencecommunitynews.com, Nov 5, 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:08, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[https://snyder.substack.com/p/the-russian-bomb-threats The Russian Bomb Threats And a Remedy to Defend Democracy], by Timothy Snyder. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:10, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Very few people care about Russia when it comes to the 2024 election which is not surprising [https://decline-of-russia.blogspot.com/2024/11/will-russia-become-failed-state-is.html given Russia's continual decline]. Relations with Russia is listed as Americans 16th most important issue in the 2024 election.[https://news.gallup.com/poll/651719/economy-important-issue-2024-presidential-vote.aspx]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given that Russia ranks #1 in the world for countries in the categories  of alcoholism and divorce and that it has an AIDS epidemic so severe that the country has run out of AIDS medication, many people just write Russia off - especially given the country's low church attendance and their struggle to try to eke out a pyrrhic victory against the much smaller country of Ukraine. It's time to reset your priorities and find a more worthy obsession than Russia. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 15:35, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You made the mistake of falling in love with [[gay bath house]]s, anal parasites, and [[Russia Russia Russia hoax]]ers. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:21, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Google admits discrepancy Harris vs Trump search ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Too late now. After the time/fact.[https://x.com/FoxNews/status/1853930394015436820 BIG BROTHER: Google makes a crucial Election Day admission about a discrepancy Americans noticed in search results when asking about Trump and VP Harris. https://trib.al/ENlwVBl][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 18:48, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== First good news: Senate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank God. It looks as the GOP controls the senate.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:51, November 5, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Hallelujah.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 00:24, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bernie Marcus, Home Depot cofounder who gave to Republicans and Israel, dies at 95. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bernie Marcus, Home Depot cofounder who gave to Republicans and Israel, dies at 95.[https://www.timesofisrael.com/bernie-marcus-home-depot-cofounder-who-gave-to-republicans-and-israel-dies-at-95/ TOI] R.I.P.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 01:14, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Netanyahu congratulates Trump ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Netanyahu congratulates Trump: 'Recommitment to the great alliance between Israel and US'.&lt;br /&gt;
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu congratulated US President-Elect Donald Trump on his apparent victory in the elections.&lt;br /&gt;
Israel National News.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/398700][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 03:28, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Thanks Bibi for being the first to do so or among the first ones.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 09:01, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Election results ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, there is a lot to celebrate today: A four-point victory in the popular vote, a three-to-five-seat pickup in the Senate, and a pickup of at least  three seats in the House. Republicans will control the whole shebang: the presidency, both houses of Congress, and the U.S. Supreme Court. After using the FBI to cheat his way to victory in 2020 and 2022, Biden must have been planning to stay in power indefinitely. We got an honest election this time around only because Biden hates Harris and has no motivation to cheat on her behalf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is my wish list: Enforcement of immigration law, action against the terrorist regime in Tehran, an end to men in women's sports and to the transitioning of minors, a reversal of energy boondoggles like the Green New Deal, approval for the Keystone Pipeline, and the promotion of patriotic education in the schools. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 08:10, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Amen. [[AP]] just conceded officially to Trump.https://apnews.com/live/trump-harris-election-updates-11-5-2024[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 09:01, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you Andy for this platform - not giving up on Trump  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We went through some hard times. By the grace of God we overcame.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:21, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I hope Elon restores more fiscal responsibility via his upcoming cost-cutting role in a government efficiency agency. I am skeptical he can do this, but willing to give him the doubt as he is sincere and acting in good faith. Plus, given how busy he is, this type of self-sacrifice is admirable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Other problem is that Trump will be a lame duck president after the midterms. But there is now the greater possibility of JD Vance being the next president. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:But election result was far more preferable to crazy Kamala who is a vacuous and phony leftist.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 07:11, November 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==President Trump, please put a stop to this insanity...==&lt;br /&gt;
...that [[Biden Harris]] [https://t.me/thisiswarobserver/6585 unleashed and] [[User:Conservative]] has been the biggest cheerleader for in [[Conservapedia]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:47, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why did so many Jews vote for Donald Trump? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Why did so many Jews vote for Donald Trump?&lt;br /&gt;
Trump received nearly 50% of Jewish votes in New York.&lt;br /&gt;
Rising antisemitism likely drove many Jewish voters to cast their ballots for President-elect Donald Trump, according to Ari Harrow, former chief of staff to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hjpcjmywyg][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 22:08, November 6, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;opi=89978449&amp;amp;url=https://www.nysun.com/article/jewish-voters-desert-democratic-party-over-the-lefts-anti-israel-fanaticism-says-pro-israel-democratic-representative Jewish Voters Desert Democratic Party Over the Left’s ‘Anti-Israel Fanaticism,’ Pro-Israel Democratic Representative Says. President Trump gained significant electoral support from Jewish voters in several key states like Florida, Arizona, Nevada, and New York, early exit polls show].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/general/2330748/eric-trump-lauds-new-square-for-unprecedented-support-in-trump-victory.html Eric Trump Lauds New Square for Unprecedented Support in Trump Victory]..&lt;br /&gt;
Monsey Scoop reported that, In a conversation with New Square Mayor Izzy Spitzer, Eric Trump expressed heartfelt appreciation for the unprecedented support shown by the Orthodox Jewish Village of New Square. The village delivered a remarkable 99.9% of its vote in favor of former President Donald Trump, marking the highest margin of victory recorded in any municipality across the nation.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 14:51, November 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Oh look, Newsom has a new title... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LOL [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/11/07/gavin-newsom-poised-to-become-leader-of-the-resistance-to-trump/  Head of resistance to Trump?][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:17, November 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like he's elbowing [[Kamala]] out of the way as titular leader of the [[DNC]]. Biden, Pelosi, and now even Obama are toast. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:42, November 7, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*Yes, 'heads are rolling'  at least in shaming campaign.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 07:04, November 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trump effect in NYC... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adams announces, prepaid debit cards for 'migrants', ending .https://nypost.com/2024/11/08/us-news/nyc-to-end-controversial-program-supplying-migrants-with-prepaid-debit-cards/ [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 07:05, November 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 3  charged in Islamic Iran-linked plot to assassinate Donald Trump ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3 charged in Iran-linked plot to assassinate Donald Trump: Sources.&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the individuals are now in custody.&lt;br /&gt;
November 8, 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/3-charged-iran-linked-plot-assassinate-donald-trump/story?id=11564687][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 12:44, November 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for this update.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 14:30, November 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trump effect: Dow Jones  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The S&amp;amp;P 500 breaks 6,000 and the Dow tops 44,000. Here's why stocks could keep climbing.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.morningstar.com/news/marketwatch/20241108448/the-sp-500-breaks-6000-and-the-dow-tops-44000-heres-why-stocks-could-keep-climbing][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:27, November 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trump effect: Qatar tells Hamas 'bye' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar made it clear to Hamas - you are not welcome here.&lt;br /&gt;
A source familiar with the matter told KAN news that the move is taking place due to heavy American pressure.&lt;br /&gt;
Author Gili Cohen.&lt;br /&gt;
Qatar has made it clear to Hamas: You are not welcome here, this was revealed for the first time today (Friday) on Friday News at Kan 11. A source familiar with the matter told Here News that the move is taking place due to heavy American pressure.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.kan.org.il/content/kan-news/politic/822251/][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== First victories for life movement after Roe v Wade ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abortion referendum have failed in Florida along with Marijuana referendum. Also Pro-life movement got their first victory in [[Nebraska]] after overturning Roe v Wade&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://nebraskaexaminer.com/2024/11/06/nebraska-passes-abortion-restrictions-amendment-bucking-national-trend/ Nebraska passes abortion-restrictions amendment, bucking national trend]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/florida-reject-abortion-protections-amendment-4-rcna173900 Effort to add abortion rights to Florida Constitution fails]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can admin Andy show that in main page? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:40, November 8, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Breaking: Stefanik chosen ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump confirms NYer Elise Stefanik will be his enforcer to the [[UN]]: ‘Strong, tough, and smart’.[https://nypost.com/2024/11/10/us-news/trump-offers-rep-elise-stefanik-ambassador-to-united-nations-post-report/ NYPost] As ambassador. So much for Trump's critics claiming he &amp;quot;hates strong women,&amp;quot; after choosing [[Susie Wiles]] too. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 03:54, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you Mr. President elect. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 08:58, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Update in America 1st : Tom Homan and Stephen .iller on immigration... Lee Zeldin for EPA on business hit by radical politics...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:01, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Most extreme Zionists protested any agreements and tore down swastika on German consulate ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''I personally disagree with any extremism. But this shows how complicated things were BEFORE the Holocaust. The AJC which was against boycotting Germany (as they followed the Lutheran leadership in this), at the time, was non or even anti-Zionist.&lt;br /&gt;
Rabbi Stephen Wise was a Zionist leader who led the boycott of Nazi Germany'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overview:&lt;br /&gt;
Following the rise of the Nazis to power in Germany in 1933, Jabotinsky called for a boycott of German products.  The members of the Thug Alliance raided cinemas in order to prevent the screening of German films.  They also removed the swastika flags from the German consulate buildings in Jaffa and Jerusalem.  Their activity was partially successful (German films were no longer screened in Israel), but in many other cases they were arrested by the authorities, albeit for a short time and without charges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sharfman, D. (2023). ''Jerusalem in the Second World War.'' United Kingdom: Taylor &amp;amp; Francis. [https://books.google.com/books?id=B7_mEAAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT58#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22from%201940%20on%2C%20during%20the%20Western%20Desert%20campaign%2C%20in%20the%20admiration%20for%20Hitler%20and%20Rommel%22&amp;amp;f=false Pt.2 'Living in wartime.']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
An Arab clerk from a respectable family in charge of the secret document archive in the police headquarters in Jerusalem was caught delivering information to the Germans and sentenced to six months detention in Acre jail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
German relations with the Arab population:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Templers were acquainted with their Arab neighbours, their culture and aspirations and, as mentioned above, served as a bridge-head for Nazi Germany's propaganda and political support of Arab national goal to liberate Palestine from the British and the Jews.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the pre-war years Nazi propaganda magazines and books in Arabic were printed in Germany and mostly sent to the German consulates in Palestine through the diplomatic post, to avoid any confiscation by the Mandate authorities. The propaganda was conducted along the lines of attracting Arab sympathy for Germany, fierce anti-Jewish agitation, support for Arab national aspirations, and strong anti-British campaigning, including horror stories about British anti-Arab activities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Meetings were usually conducted in German-owned hotels where the Nazi dogma was propagated by 'tourists' from Germany. During the Arab Revolt (1936–1939) the Arabs had mostly German weapons. Canaan points out that the Germans used their access to the local population in Palestine, as in European countries, in order to establish 'fifth column' groups. In Palestine they used commercial relations, as they employed Arabs in their farms and factories, and in some cases there were even marriages despite their usual social separation from the local population. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The success of Nazi propaganda [among the Arabs].was especially manifested from 1940 on, during the Western Desert campaign, in the admiration for Hitler and Rommel.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The German consulate in Jerusalem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consulate was headed by Heinrich Wolff from 1933 to 1935 and later by Walter Dohle in 1936–1939. At a social level, Wolff and Dohle were rigidly courteous andcorrect in correspondence with Palestinian Jews. However, the consuls were faithful executors of Nazi racial policy towards any German Jew.&lt;br /&gt;
The German Consulate office was in the Prophets Street for many years until the British closed it at the outbreak of the war. Members of the extremist Jewish '&amp;lt;u&amp;gt;Brith Habirionin&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt; (the thugs' alliance) attacked the consulate in 1933 expressing the growing tension among the Jewish population. As one of their members, Yaakov Orenstein reported their anti-Nazi sentiments: We could not accept the fact that German goods are sold in stores in Palestine. &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;In one week we '''took down, despite the strict guard of the British police, the swastika flags from the German consulates''' in Jaffa and Jerusalem&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. We demolished shop windows, where German goods were displayed, and even though the shop owners were quite angry, these actions aroused public attention. After the outbreak of the war, the building was used by the Mandatory Public Works Department in Jerusalem.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 03:50, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trump's first act==&lt;br /&gt;
should be blanket pardons for the [[J6]] political prisoners in the [[DC gulag]], as well as [[Mike Flynn]], [[Bannon]], [[Peter Navarro]], etc., ahead of Ukraine, fracking, immigration, etc. We need more voices out there talking about [[Democrat]] [[totalitarianism]] and [[human rights]] abuses. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:09, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:God bless the USA. I just had the urge to say it, again. I just hope Almighty God  guides him[[User:LaMarina|LaMarina]] ([[User talk:LaMarina|talk]]) 17:22, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Democrats: 'woke is broke' ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14069015/morning-joe-kamala-harris-election-loss-woke-democrats.html Morning Joe takes vicious swipe at Kamala Harris election loss and tells viewers 'woke is broke'], [https://nypost.com/2024/11/11/media/morning-joe-crew-reads-ny-times-column-ripping-woke-politics/ 'Morning Joe’ crew reads Maureen Dowd column ripping identity politics: ‘Democrats are realizing woke is broke!’][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:00, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://jimtreacher.substack.com/p/which-lessons-will-the-dems-refuse Which Lessons Will the Dems Refuse to Learn This Time? Hint: All of them]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:15, November 11, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think David Axelrod was the first to admit that the Democrats became the party of smarty pants minority.. Ex-Obama adviser David Axelrod says Dems have become ‘smarty-pants, suburban, college-educated party’. [https://nypost.com/2024/11/08/us-news/david-axelrod-calls-dems-smarty-pants-suburban-college-educated-party/] [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 01:03, November 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The GOP is now the party of the [[labor union]]s and the [[working class]]; the [[Dems]] are the party of [[Wall Street]] and the rich (actually, it's been this way since the Clinton era). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:03, November 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::I understand what you're saying. Though on Wall Street per se, there are plenty of pro Trump there and many businesses like his economics, and rich people like Adelson and Musk are not rare, but you're right in the concept of things,  in general.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Trump is not a traditional GOP Wall Street guy. Never has been. He's a real estate investor. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:34, November 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Speaker Johnson Orders Entire Biden Administration to Preserve and Retain All Records and Documents ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/11/12/exclusive-speaker-johnson-orders-entire-biden-administration-preserve-retain-all-records-documents/ Exclusive — Speaker Johnson Orders Entire Biden Administration to Preserve and Retain All Records and Documents]. He ordered the entire administration of President Joe Biden to preserve all records and communications in the waning days of the outgoing Democrat administration as former President Donald Trump’s team prepares to take over.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 16:37, November 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sarah Huckabee congrats father ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders celebrates father's appointment as Israel ambassador.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYa4SxNQJpI Short. Emotional.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal is upset Huckabee told truth &amp;quot;no such thing as palestinian people&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mike Huckabee]] once said that ‘there’s really no such thing as a [[Palestinian]]’&lt;br /&gt;
By Andrew Kaczynski, CNN. November 12, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/12/politics/mike-huckabee-palestinian-comments-trump-israel-ambassador/index.html]. Well, he is right.  No such a thing a separate identity. (See for example[https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/now-more-than-ever-absolutely-no-to-a-two-state-solution/].[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 22:02, November 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:One of those things many know, but it's not PC to say.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:21, November 12, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 'From Nazis to Jihadists: Antisemitism, the cancer of the West: Jihadists reenact Europe's Nazi history' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hkbkamcz1x From Nazis to Jihadists: Antisemitism, the cancer of the West. The blatant and violent antisemitic attacks in the Netherlands show Europe has learned nothing from its dark past and now Jihadists reenact its Nazi history.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://pjmedia.com/robert-spencer/2024/11/08/pogrom-in-the-netherlands-muslim-mobs-hunt-down-jews-in-amsterdam-n4934106 Pogrom in the Netherlands: Muslim Mobs Hunt Down Jews in Amsterdam.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:28, November 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:With Europe's subpar birth rate, in 20 years [[NATO]], should it survive, will be made up of jihadi troops loyal to the [[Caliph]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:46, November 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Woke mob branded Trump a &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; for that temporary hold from problematic countries..[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 14:15, November 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Woke Haaretz (Haaretzism) is upset at Tulsi pick  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://archive.ph/rUsMA/38255d7d8cfc411b47e0acb778bc3ba7ec696d26.png boo hoo].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 18:15, November 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm om board with the Tulsi 2036 campaign after JD's two terms. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:56, November 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I see. (How old will she be then, BTW?)[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:55, November 13, 2024 (EST)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==27 suicides linked to [[Kamala]]/[[CIA]] [[propaganda]]==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://rumble.com/v5o8oae-cia-media-caused-liberal-suicides..html] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:10, November 13, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==David T. Pyne==&lt;br /&gt;
Very interesting read start to finish, includes this little nugget about [[John Thune]] (despite the obvious printing error):&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;Charlie Kirk revealed that [[Sen. Mike Lee]] (R-UT) contacted him regarding his brilliant idea to persuade Vice President-Elect Vance to serve as full-time President of the Senate if [[Never Trumper]] Sen. [[John Thune]] (R-SD) was elected Senate Majority Leader, as in fact he was earlier today. He said Senate rules clearly state that the senior Senate leader in attendance shall preside and the most senior Senate leader is the President of the Senate which outranks Senate Majority Leader. In this way, [[JD Vance|Vance]] could set the agenda, prevent Thune from passing [sic; should read opposing] [[Trump]]’s [[America First]] agenda and even make committee assignments including Committee chairs and subcommittee chairs.&amp;quot;'' [https://dpyne.substack.com/p/return-of-the-neoconspresident-elect] &lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:03, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simplicius: [https://simplicius76.substack.com/p/diving-into-trumps-nominations-hope]&lt;br /&gt;
:''GOP [[Massie]] says “recess appointments” when asked if GAETZ can get confirmed by the Senate “He’s the Attorney General. Suck it up!”... if something were to happen, Florida Governor DeSantis is said to be able to install Gaetz into Marco Rubio’s now-vacant Florida Senator seat, which I believe would last until 2026.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sundance adds this: [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/11/14/president-trump-announces-deputy-ag-todd-blanche-and-interim-acting-dag-emil-bove-during-confirmation-process/]&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;A very strategic plan for Main Justice transition delivered today by President Trump.  President Trump has announced Deputy AG Todd Blanche to be #2 in charge behind Matt Gaetz, and Emil Bove to serve as interim Acting DAG in case the Senate drag their feet on confirmations.  This makes a very quick transition period in Main Justice with President Trump officials immediately taking charge.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:17, November 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Trump won Jewish neighborhoods across America== &lt;br /&gt;
Trump won Jewish neighborhoods across America. Despite the push polls from liberal Jewish organizations and dubious exit polls, actual precinct data from the largest Jewish neighborhoods in the country shows Jews voted for Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Greenfield]].Nov 14, 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/399180].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 09:03, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Why Islamic lobby - OIC, Not US should finance UN ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://justsayingitoutloloud.blogspot.com/2024/11/the-oic-needs-to-finance-un-it-has-grip.html The OIC needs to finance the UN it has a grip on, since it’s basically serving them, the Islamic lobby interests above all].&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GENOCIDE/S?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What has the UN ever done to prevent REAL genocides?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Uganda under '''Islamic''' Idi Amin 1971/79: 500,000;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Bangladesh Genocide of 1971 by '''Islamic''' Pakistan: 3,000,000;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rwanda 1994: 500,000 to 800,000;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Supremacist '''Arab''' racist genocide in Darfur: 2003-5: 200,000;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Iraq under '''Arab''' tyrant Saddam Hussein since the ’70s: 500,000;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Arab Islamic''' Syria as of Mar 2024: 617,910;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Or on '''Arab Islamist''' attempted genocide (since 1920s with al Husseini coining “itbakh [Adbakh] al yahud” and intensified in 1947), while everyone knows the tactics of “Palestinian” or Hezbollah to bring about their civilian deaths – beginning with Arafat’s methods in early 1980s.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 13:22, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reagan admin appointees speak out==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Paul Craig Roberts]]: [https://thealtworld.com/paul_craig_roberts/the-establishment-is-disarming-the-trump-insurrection The Establishment Is Disarming the Trump Insurrection]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[David Stockman]]: [https://davidstockman.substack.com/p/trumps-hegseth-caper-and-the-delusion Trump’s Hegseth Caper And The Delusion of “Peace Through Strength”]&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:19, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== FEMA fired employee: &amp;quot;It was common practice &amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
FEMA worker accused of telling staff to skip hurricane-ravaged Trump homes claims it was common practice: ‘This is not isolated’&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/11/exclusive-new-youtube-video-done-93511406.jpg?resize=1024,544&amp;amp;quality=75&amp;amp;strip=all Her pic]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://nypost.com/2024/11/12/us-news/fema-worker-accused-of-telling-staff-to-skip-hurricane-ravaged-trump-homes-claims-it-was-common-practice-this-is-not-isolated/] [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:33, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trump and Ukraine ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With Mark Rubio at the State Department, Pete Hegseth at Defense, and Congressman Michael Walz as National Security Advisor, [https://euromaidanpress.com/2024/11/13/politico-trumps-new-cabinet-picks-spark-hope-for-ukraines-supporters/ we can characterize the incoming Trump administration as pro-Ukrainian]. As for Matt Gaetz at DOJ, [https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/on-trumps-foolish-futile-matt-gaetz-ag-nomination/ he is unlikely to be confirmed]. It seems that Putin's strategy was to hope that the U.S. would collapse in civil war after the election. Somebody is going to fight for transgendered rights and for Harris? Trump and Biden are buddies now. After all, they both hate Harris and the Obama-Clinton establishment. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 23:23, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Dream on, and line up for the Kool-Aid. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:28, November 14, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Who told Trump that nominating Gaetz was a good idea? See &amp;quot;[https://abcnews.go.com/US/woman-testified-house-ethics-committee-gaetz-sex-17/story?id=115867555 Woman testified to House Ethics Committee that Gaetz had sex with her when she was 17: Sources].&amp;quot; This is just the initial leak. The full ethics report made up by the House will inevitably come out. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 01:34, November 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
::::I looked at the allegations against Gaetz and they do not appear to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt charges and under US law one is innocent until proven guilty. I hope the firebrand Gaetz gets rid of bad civil servants if he is appointed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 14:46, November 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Rubio is a great pick. We can all like Gaetz's audacity and his standing up, but on this I tend to agree with PeterKa.  No offense. &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(Commendreans is a radical liberal site BTW. Castro-praising &amp;quot;revolution&amp;quot; type too)&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:47, November 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*What does Putin do now that post-election unrest in the U.S. has failed to materialize? [https://youtu.be/ulGhs5Cg58g The latest Russian strategy is to charge Ukrainian positions in the Kursk sector every 15 minutes or so with a four-to-eight-man squad]. Why Kursk? Only Putin knows. But driving the Ukrainians out of Russia would put the country in a better negotiating position. The Ukrainians took Kursk in the first place to use it as a bargaining chip to recover land elsewhere. That logic assumes that Putin is ready to negotiate after Trump is inaugurated. A compromise solution would trigger unrest inside Russia. The only reason Putin would consider such a thing is if the alternative is something worse, i.e. a Ukrainian victory. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:18, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There isn't much to negotiate in Kursk. There's only about 3,000 remaining, most being members of the Russian Liberation Army or [[NATO]] mercenaries who are being shot on site as [[terrorist]]s. None are protected by the [[Geneva Convention]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:45, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Zelensky]] will be railroaded out of town long before any serious negotiations begin between Russia and the US or Russia and [[Kyiv]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:55, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/11/16/zelenskyy-says-conflict-with-russia-can-end-with-diplomacy/ Zelenskyy Says Conflict with Russia Can End with Diplomacy].&lt;br /&gt;
::Wee duh. It's a little late for that:&lt;br /&gt;
::*Ukraine has a law on the books forbidding negotiations with [[Putin]];&lt;br /&gt;
::*[[Moscow]] does not recognize the legitimacy of [[Zelensky]] since his term of office ended in May 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And Moscow doesn't trust ANYTHING on paper backed by the [[United States]], [[Germany]], or [[France]], regarding them as worthless as [[Minsk Accords]] or the United States pledge not expand [[NATO]] one inch beyond the [[Oder-Neise Line]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not up to Zelensky to negotiate. It's up to his puppet masters - the US. And this requires some concessions on the US part evidenced by action, of [[good faith]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:18, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The whole [[2024 NATO invasion of Kursk|Kursk fiasco]] shows the bankruptcy of [[US]] &amp;amp; [[Western alliance|Western]] strategic thought - pouring 30,000 of the best trained, best equipped men into a cauldron thinking it could make a difference before US election day. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:31, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Gaetz is the least popular nominee  (among Republicans) so far.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 00:13, November 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:'''Update:''' About 180 Ukrainian Armed Forces militants were eliminated in the Kursk region while trying to escape from encirclement. [https://t.me/Slavyangrad/113372?single Video]. About 250 militants tried to escape the cauldron, Mash reports. 24 invaders were taken prisoner. According to prisoners, between 400 and 600 occupiers, including foreign mercenaries, remain surrounded. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:50, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== That's not nice OMAR...She can't handle hecklers when it comes from the right ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'F--k you!'&lt;br /&gt;
Ilhan Omar uses expletive against pro-Israel protesters.&lt;br /&gt;
Minnesota lawmaker uses expletive in response to pro-Israel protesters on Capitol Hill who called her out for her refusal to condemn Hamas and demanded that she “go to Gaza.”&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/399221].[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 01:45, November 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ynet[https://www.ynetnews.com/article/s1rwg11nzyg Rep. Omar to pro-Israel activists at Capitol: 'F**k you'] has it too.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:48, November 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This went unnoticed 2 weeks ago: [https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/all-things-trump/somali-leaders-minnesota-endorse-trump-president Somali leaders in Minnesota endorse Trump for president] (and this over Minnesota [[DFL]] gov [[Walz]]). So evidentially there's a split in Omar's base. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:06, November 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Omar's base. Very apt.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 22:39, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Casey and Dems want to steal Senate seat from David McCormick ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
−	&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
−	&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bob Casey]] and Dems want to steal Senate seat from [[David McCormick]]. Bob Casey don't want to concede, and want count all undated ballots which violate rules. Bucks County Commissioner give permission for that to steal that seat for him &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
−	&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
−	&lt;br /&gt;
https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/1857434284060999693&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
−	&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
−	&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 14:21, November 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Stubborn Casey's-case is the weirdest in this election.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:50, November 15, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A rarity...WaPo Calls Out Dem Bob Casey for Trying to Overturn PA Senate Race [https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2024/11/17/the-wapo-throws-democrats-under-the-bus-n2647888][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:37, November 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== They're still counting in CA? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/nicksortor/status/1857956282465988654 16th district] ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2020 census leave Republicans with less House seats and electoral college votes than should they get ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BREAKING: New analysis of the properly apportioned Electoral College finds Trump's victory is even BIGGER than expected, if the 2020 Census was not botched.&lt;br /&gt;
Trump: 320 &lt;br /&gt;
Harris: 218 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The analysis from Seth Keshel&lt;br /&gt;
found that upwards of 15 US House seats were handed to Democrats and COULD have been Republican.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Potential GOP House majority (current is very narrow):&lt;br /&gt;
REP: 236&lt;br /&gt;
DEM: 199&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. Census Bureau Stole At Least 16 Electoral Votes and 15 U.S. House Seats &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Texas, Georgia and Florida would get much higher House seats and electoral votes, while New York, California and Rhode Island would lose more &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://skeshel.substack.com/p/the-us-census-bureau-stole-at-least The U.S. Census Bureau Stole At Least 16 Electoral Votes and 15 U.S. House Seats] --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 03:53, November 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[[Seth Keshel]], a young man with a brilliant future. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:32, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Mein Kampf&amp;quot; in living room Gaza or Hezbollah areas of Lebanon  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.ynetnews.com/article/h1rcrtifyl Hitler's book in the living room: IDF commandos operating in Lebanon's deepest parts. ''Ynet'' reporter joins elite ''Duvdevan'' soldiers spearheading the fight against Hezbollah after serving in the West Bank and Gaza; 'We can’t underestimate this enemy']. &lt;br /&gt;
Nowhere in the world is [[Hitler]]'s book so popular as in [[Arab]] &amp;quot;[[palestine]]&amp;quot; or [[Hezbollah]] areas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Arabic annotated copy of 'Mein Kampf' found among possessions of terrorist in Gaza home. ''The Times of Israel.'' Nov 12, 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/arabic-annotated-copy-of-mein-kampf-found-among-possessions-of-terrorist-in-gaza-home/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Soldiers find copy of Mein Kampf in Gaza home. Lieutenant N. says the moment he found Hitler's book in a Hamas terrorists' house he realized he is not just fighting against Hamas but against the idea of exterminating Jews and Israelis. Yoav Zitun|11.30.23 |''Ynet''.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.ynetnews.com/article/ryymyd8ha]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*IDF troops find 'Mein Kampf' copy in Nuseirat, Gaza Strip - report. ''The Jerusalem Post.'' June 19, 2024.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/article-806949]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:22, November 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trump greeted with USA! USA! in NY ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Trump walked in to “American Bad Ass,” by Kid Rock, and was met with a chant of “U.S.A.! U.S.A.!” - [https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/us/politics/donald-trump-msg-ufc.html Trump, Visiting New York, Finds a Friendly Crowd at a Fight].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:29, November 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Resistance Leaders: A Gay Muslim Man Running the Women’s March ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Aquib Shaheed Yacoob, the chief of staff of the Women’s March, is a gay Muslim man who cut his teeth on early BLM activism in Ferguson through Amnesty International. Then he became the chief of staff to Tamika Mallory, one of the three March leaders, just as controversy broke out over her support for Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan who had praised Hitler&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Mallory’s departure, Yaqoob climbed through the ranks until the Muslim man became the chief of staff for a leading feminist organization which describes itself as “women-led.”&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.frontpagemag.com/resistance-leaders-a-gay-muslim-man-running-the-womens-march/ Resistance Leaders: A Gay Muslim Man Running the Women’s March. Don’t look at the man behind the curtain]. This Pakistani hasn't 'visited' &amp;quot;palestine&amp;quot; rooftops yet..[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 18:34, November 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:This is funny and ridiculous, just as that movement is. Let's see how many women or and men will show up this time around [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 05:53, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Some might call it &amp;quot; progress&amp;quot;.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 18:44, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Biden pushing Ukraine to start WW3 with Russia before leaving office ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Its clear Biden regime want to disrupt Trump peace negotiation between Russia and Ukraine, and call [[Zelenski]] now to use long-range US weapons against Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.cnn.com/2024/11/17/politics/biden-authorizes-ukraine-missiles-russian-targets/index.html Biden authorizes Ukraine to use long-range US weapons in Russia ] --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:20, November 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This come after [[Adam Kinzinger]] called Biden to give Ukraine weapons that need to start their war against Russia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also come after [[Simone Biles]] tweet that called Biden to shake things up before leaving office&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simone Biles is the one who got advantage of banning Russian athletes in Olympic, so she could win gold Olympic medals easily --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 21:30, November 17, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They've talking about doing this for months. Its remarkable that the decision comes right after the election. Avoiding military victory has been the strategy of the Democratic party since Truman fired McArthur in the Korean War. Has Biden has finally decided to ditch this tradition? My prediction: The war will end when the Russians retreat from Crimea. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 09:29, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Why should they retreat from territory they won from the [[Turk]]s more than 200 years ago, and that the unelected Ukrainian [[communist]] [[Nikita Khruschev]] gave to the [[Kiev regime]] in defiance of the [[US]] policy of [[self determination]] of peoples? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::[https://t.me/myLordBebo/50798 When they announced WW3].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Last summer you heard talk of &amp;quot;Trump-proofing&amp;quot; the NATO war. This is it. It's no surprise. Kamala's gracious concession and  Biden welcoming Trump into the White House are part of it. It all started when Lord Cameron visited Trump in April. [https://www.politico.com/news/2024/04/08/cameron-trump-florida-visit-00151181] Under normal circumstances that would have been decried as foreign election interference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::It's not too late to remove Biden and his demented advisors via the 22 Amendment. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:56, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Khrushchev wasnt Ukrainian, however his wife was Ukrainian, probably she is the one who influenced to give Crimea to Ukraine --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 20:33, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Okay. Khruschev was a Russian born in Ukraine before [[Lenin]] created the state of Ukraine. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:39, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Many say it's a mystery why Khrushchev did it (including he was drunk at the time). It looks like a [[Bolshevik]] version of &amp;quot;divide and rule&amp;quot; the Russian people. The communists always feared a nationalist uprising. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:07, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Khrushchev was from Kalinovka, which is in Kursk. There was a power struggle between Khrushchev and Malenkov at the time of the transfer of Crimea. Khrushchev wanted to win over the Ukrainian boss. Crimea was transferred to Ukraine in February 1954. Malenkov resigned as premier in February 1955. He was expelled from the presidium in 1957, leaving Khrushchev with full power. (Khrushchev would then restart the Cold War.) [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:40, November 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Khruschev moved to [[Donetsk]] at the age of 15 and led the Soviet invasion of Poland (into what he called &amp;quot;Western Ukraine&amp;quot;) in 1939. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:53, November 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Simply stated, the Crimea has never been &amp;quot;Ukrainian&amp;quot;, i.e. populated by the ethnic group that refer to themselves as &amp;quot;Ukrainian&amp;quot;. Prior to Stalin's deportation of the Taters (Muslim Turks) in 1944 for collaboration with the Nazis, the Russians were a minority. The modern myth that Crimea belongs to &amp;quot;Ukraine&amp;quot; is [[CIA]]/Polish intelligence/Baltic intelligence [[propaganda]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::But the Crimea is a much sought-after resort area and vacation spot because of its mild climate to escape Northern winters. Even Hitler wanted to turn it into the &amp;quot;German Riveria&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
::::It was the idea of &amp;quot;[[California on the Crimea]]&amp;quot; - a Jewish homeland prior to the creation of the State of Israel, that [[Elizabeth Zarubina]] convinced [[J. Robert Oppenheimer]] to cooperate in 1941 with the [[KGB]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:45, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Biden is recalling Obama's strategy toward ISIS. Early on, Obama wanted to &amp;quot;contain&amp;quot; ISIS. He intensified the bombing just before he left office lest Trump get all the credit.&lt;br /&gt;
:::::As for Crimea, its a mechanism to remove Putin from power (or keep him in it, depending on which side you are on). [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 06:31, November 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::[[ISIS]] was a [[CIA]] creation, per Trump [[National Security Advisor]] and former [[DIA]] chief [[Gen Michael Flynn]]. [https://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41943.htm] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:06, November 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Meanwhile, Dictator Erdogan....&lt;br /&gt;
[[Turkey]] bombs [[Syria]], cuts off water for more than 1 million. Turkey has attacked drought-stricken northeastern Syria, cutting off its electricity and water.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/399424].[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 08:03, November 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::More about Syria...&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/israel-finds-large-troves-of-russian-arms-in-hezbollahs-hands-eeed9445 WSJ]:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Israel Finds Large Troves of Russian Arms in Hezbollah’s Hands. Some of the weapons in Lebanon, which include modern antitank missiles, have come from Russian stockpiles in neighboring Syria.&amp;quot;[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 10:44, November 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Likely Soviet era weapons from Soviet era stockpiles. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:59, November 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ukraine was able to keep Crimea for their own if they didnt overturned their Democratically elected government in 2014, then Russia have no choice only to annex it. They blindly trusted Obama and NATO --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 14:11, November 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::That's right. Russia had a 28 year lease there which the Kiev regime wanted to terminate and give to [[NATO]]. [https://archive.is/V1Lpw] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:10, November 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It sounds like Biden actually wants to win this war: &amp;quot;[https://nypost.com/2024/11/19/us-news/biden-authorizes-shipment-of-antipersonnel-land-mines-to-ukraine-report/ Biden authorizes the shipment of antipersonnel land mines to Ukraine in latest about-face].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Earlier, Biden was supposedly petrified that these weapons would lead to nuclear war. Now, not so much. I think it is clear that these decisions were driven domestic political concerns all along. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 08:07, November 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Biden should be impeached right now --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 22:11, November 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::What Biden should be impeached for is failure to enforce immigration law. It violates his oath to &amp;quot;[https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S3-3-1/ALDE_00001160/ take care that the law be faithfully executed].&amp;quot; [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 09:21, November 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== DOGE: Our Tax$$$ to... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://x.com/DOGE/status/1858540521096089876 What a list]. Here are some&lt;br /&gt;
Of items your tax dollars are being spent on: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-$100,000 to study if tequila or gin makes sunfish more aggressive &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Nearly $1M to study if cocaine makes Japanese quail more sexually promiscuous &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-$750,000 to study if the moon landing line was “One small step for Man” or “One small step for ‘A’ man”— the study was inconclusive.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 18:50, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-[https://youtu.be/aFr5q5mzw48 DOGE will cut $442,340 Fauci spent to study the behavior of male prostitutes in Vietnam]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-[https://t.me/AussieCossack/27491?single Pelosi opened a liquor store in the House where Members can buy alcohol with their taxpayer-funded Member Representational Allowance]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:14, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Unfortunately, DOGE looks like another Grace Commission Report or [[Proxmire]] Folden Fleece Award. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:20, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I hope there will be a comprehensive report on these 4 years.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 19:21, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's easy to identify money that's already been dispersed; the problem is rooting out the various grant programs offered by virtually every department of government. It's like promises to simplify or reform the tax code - you could do it, but in two years with the election of the next Congress all the garbage will be right back in law. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:03, November 18, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 10:45, November 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== China's Xi sets boundaries for Trump with 4 'red lines' ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.yahoo.com/news/chinas-xi-sets-boundaries-trump-070934960.html China's Xi sets boundaries for Trump with 4 'red lines']. The challenge. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 14:55, November 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Or is it that Xi is nervous?[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:26, November 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Or out with the weak one [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:44, November 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::These &amp;quot;red lines&amp;quot; are so comprehensive as to be meaningless. Its an updated version of the &amp;quot;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China's_final_warning final warnings]&amp;quot; that Mao Zedong used to issue. By 1964, there were already 900 Chinese final warnings. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 09:11, November 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::From the article: &amp;quot;In June, Trump told Bloomberg Businessweek that Taiwan should pay the US for defense.&amp;quot; I suspect that's more of a red line with the US [[deep state]] than it is with Xi of China. That's the kind of talk that could get him impeached a third time. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:35, November 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Palestinian Authority: &amp;quot;We can manipulate Trump&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://palwatch.org/page/35652 Palestinian Authority continues to demonize Donald Trump. (PMW)][[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 17:25, November 19, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Good luck with that, &amp;quot;palestine.&amp;quot;[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:42, November 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abdul-Malik: &amp;quot;I feel like Bin Laden&amp;quot; - wanted to bomb NYSE ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'I feel like Bin Laden': Florida man arrested for allegedly planning to bomb NYSE.&lt;br /&gt;
Harun Abdul-Malik Yener, 30, of Coral Springs was arrested on Wednesday and was charged with an attempt to use an explosive device to damage or destroy a building used in interstate commerce, according to the DOJ.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://cbsaustin.com/news/nation-world/i-feel-like-bin-laden-florida-man-arrested-for-allegedly-planning-to-bomb-nyse-department-of-justice-thanksgiving-explosive-device-fbi-harun-abdul-malik-yener-coral-springs-bomb-making-schematics-militia-confidential-source].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 23:01, November 20, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Suing Islamic Republic of Iran for Oct 7 atrocities (NYTimes) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Families of American Victims of Oct. 7 Attack Sue Iran.&lt;br /&gt;
The lawsuit aims to highlight Iran’s role in the attack that killed about 1,200 people as well as its support for Hamas and other terrorist groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By Adam Goldman and Ronen Bergman.&lt;br /&gt;
Nov. 17, 2024&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Families of American victims of the Hamas-led terrorist attack on Oct. 7 and those killed fighting in Gaza sued Iran on Sunday, accusing it of supporting the single deadliest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, details Iran’s funding of Hamas and its embrace of other terrorist organizations seeking to destroy Israel. The lawsuit relies, at least partly, on Hamas documents that were seized in Gaza and published in the news media, including The New York Times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But lawyers for the plaintiffs in the case also appear to have obtained original documents that refer to a secret planning meeting of a small group of Hamas’s political and military leaders in December 2022.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the meeting, Yahya Sinwar, then the leader of the group in Gaza, requested an additional $7 million a month from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to fund the attack on Oct. 7, known as the “big project.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Times has independently reviewed a set of the documents that refer to the $7 million, including details about the way Hamas’s leadership works and the preparations that went into its attack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lawsuit also mentions the role of the Revolutionary Guards in coordinating between Hamas and Hezbollah, a regional ally, in preparation for the attack, which The Times has reported.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The groups named in the lawsuit — Hamas, Hezbollah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine — have all been designated foreign terrorist organizations by the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Last month, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken denounced Hamas’s campaign against Israel, saying, “The depravity of Hamas’s crimes is almost unspeakable.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The families involved in the lawsuit include those of Americans who were killed, injured or suffered mental anguish on Oct. 7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Forty-six Americans, including children, were killed on Oct. 7. Hamas also took about 250 people hostage, including 12 Americans. Seven Americans remain in Gaza but three are presumed dead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lawsuit also includes Americans killed in combat in Gaza or northern Israel. More than 30 American-Israeli citizens have been killed while fighting for the Israel Defense Forces, a State Department official said.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of them was Moshe Leiter, 39, a reservist in an elite naval unit. His father, Yechiel Leiter, is set to become Israeli ambassador to the United States next year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other American victims included Danielle Waldman, 24, who was born in Palo Alto, Calif. She and her boyfriend were among at least 360 people killed at the Nova music festival on Oct. 7, 2023. She was apparently ambushed in her car, which was riddled with bullet holes and stained with blood. She met her boyfriend while serving in the Israeli army.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and Anti-Terrorism Act. It was filed by a group of prominent lawyers, including Gary M. Osen, who once represented Nazi victims, and Lee Wolosky.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Wolosky served during the Obama administration as the State Department’s envoy for negotiating transfers of detainees from the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Hard, incontrovertible evidence of who funded Hamas is now becoming available in the form of documents, bank records and the like, and we intend to hold those parties accountable, in the courts of the United States or elsewhere, for however long it takes” Mr. Wolosky and Mr. Osen said in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Claimed victims of terrorist attacks led by Iran have repeatedly sued the country in American courts over the years. Iran never shows up to defend itself, and the plaintiffs often win default judgments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2011, lawyers representing families of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks won a default judgment against Iran, Hezbollah, the Taliban and Al Qaeda in a lawsuit filed in Manhattan federal court that claimed Iranian officials helped the hijackers who flew jetliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/17/us/politics/iran-oct-7-families-lawsuit.html[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:49, November 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 'I told you so' Gaetz out ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I knew it[https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/21/trump-ag-pick-matt-gaetz-says-hes-withdrawing.html]. There was no chance for him being confirmed. He is hated even at GOP .I'm just surprised he was at all, in the first place.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 12:40, November 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Looks like he's headed to fill [[Rubio]]'s seat. That may have been the plan all along. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:33, November 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Very possible. And some say he was a sacrificial lamb all along.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 15:44, November 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yah, he resigned from Congress two days before the Ethics report came out, making the report [[moot]]. He won't have a problem, finding a job. Like Kamala, he may fail upward. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:06, November 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::There was a dirtier report about to come out on Gaetz, just before Trump gave him a hint this morning. Anyways, we got a great pick: [[Pam Bondi| Bondi]].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 21:12, November 21, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Sundance of the Conservative treehouse is none-too happy. It has something to do with Florida politics. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/11/21/pam-bondi/] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
::::::If there was a confirmation hearing, they would have to release the report from the Ethics Committee. That's the minimum that transparency requires. That was something that Gaetz was anxious to avoid. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 02:44, November 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Not sure about that. Gaetz' resignation would have sealed the record. But Dems and their staffers on the Ethics Committee would have done a slow-drip [[leak]] of the contents, making it all rumor and innuendo, which is probably worse. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:56, November 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::What it amounts to is probably a &amp;quot;he said she said&amp;quot;, which is why the [[DOJ]] didn't prosecute. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:59, November 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::So now, we might never know what more dirt was in the NEW case. BTW I think the criticism of Bondi in the link Rob cited relates to Trayvon Martin. A valid criticism on her.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 04:51, November 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Both ranking members on the Senate Judiciary Committee requested the report. If it wasn't released, members would certainly have a good reason to oppose the nomination. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 06:07, November 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::It would be unethical for the Ethics Committee to release a hit job on a non-member. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:06, November 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::I added Rob's link [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Pam_Bondi&amp;amp;diff=2087244&amp;amp;oldid=2087207 here].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 06:16, November 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Aside from CTH, the internet's conservative pundit are hailing the choice of Pam Bondi. See [https://redstate.com/terichristoph/2024/11/21/watch-the-liberal-meltdown-over-pam-bondi-has-begun-n2182327 RedState]. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 00:07, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::[https://therightscoop.com/watch-dana-loesch-raises-red-flag-about-pam-bondi-nomination/ Dana Loesch raises RED FLAG about Pam Bondi nomination]. Loesch is like [[NRA]] President or spokesman or sumpin. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:10, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::Here's a [https://rumble.com/user/PepeLivesMatter bunch of Pam Bondi clips.] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:45, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Infuriating MSNBC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MSNBC blasted for 'depraved' article that sympathizes with [[Laken Riley]]'s migrant killer Jose Ibarra.&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14114437/MSNBC-Laken-Riley-killer-chance-Jose-Ibarra.html][[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 10:31, November 22, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:They're going down fast. [[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 23:28, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== MSNBC's Palestinian Ayman Mohyeldin upset at Tulsi ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://justsayingitoutloloud.blogspot.com/2024/11/msnbc-ayman-mohyeldin-pallywood.html Hilleruiusly hypocrite].[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 23:27, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Oreshnik]] update==&lt;br /&gt;
Ukrainians calculate only 5 of 6 [[MIRV]]s is enough to wipe out [[Kyiv]] [https://t.me/ukr_leaks_eng/17508] (they call em &amp;quot;blocks&amp;quot;. One Oreshnik missile carries 6 MIRVs with 6 independently targetable warheads each. 6 x 6 = 36 warheads).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[hypersonic]] Oreshnik can't be detected on radar and can't be shot down by any MD (missile defense system).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The whole Ukraine fiasco, and now the Oreshnik, they are trying cast as another &amp;quot;Sputnik moment&amp;quot;. The problems with this are obvious: (1) demoralization - nobody wants to join the [[woke]] military; (2) the Russians are more than a generation ahead in weapons development, despite operating on only a fraction of what the US &amp;amp; NATO spend. Admitting this is the same as admitting the [[deep state]] has [[lied]] about everything pertaining to [[Russia]] and our own defense budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NATO]] warlords meet on Tuesday to plot their next move. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:11, November 25, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Note to [[User:Conservative]]: okay, so you now understand the Oreshnik is not designed to fly across the ocean or over the Arctic. However, by simply adding another stage to the rocket booster you have now a new missile with a different name using the same [[technology]]. It flys at 7,600 mph or 3 km per sec. Instead of taking 19 minutes to hit [[London]], it takes about 72 minutes to hit North America. The [[United States]] (1) does not possess this [[technology]]; and (2) does not possess a missile defense system to stop it. If started tomorrow, it would probably take the [[US]] a decade or two to equal Russia's current state-of-the-art, both offensive and defensive ([[electronic warfare]]), capabilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:So go ahead - keep talking your [[globalist]] [[MSM]] smack. See where it gets ya. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:26, November 25, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::This actually is how the scenarios would work: Oreshnik would be used to hit [[Ramstein]] and the big base in Poland; other targets would include the Aegis Ashore launch sites and bases in [[Romania]]; Lakenheath in the [[UK]] would be a target. Even US bases in [[Syria]] could possibly be hit. If the war were to escalate with US strikes in Russia proper, with either nukes or non-nukes (and especially if civilians were killed), than [[Sarmat]] and Russia's nuclear triad would strike North America. (Est. dead Americans: 150 million; I'd have to look up est. Russian dead. European civilization would cease to exist).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As to Russia's nuclear triad (air, land, and sea launched), according to [[user:Conservative]]'s favorite [[neocon]] [[globalist]] [[warmonger]] source ''[[Foreign Affairs]]'' and the [[Atlantic Council]], Russia's nuclear triad is superior to America's. [https://t.me/Slavyangrad/114047 The US and the West is fully aware that Russia holds the nuclear edge], November 26, 2024. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:46, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Now for the insanity [[User:Conservative]] likes to feed on and his mentors like to spout (like [[Jake the Snake Sullivan]]), see [[Nuclear primacy]]. The error of this doctrine is, Russia has superior [[electronic warfare]] (the ability to detect and destroy incoming missiles) capabilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You see, [[user:Conservative]], decades of study and learning which sources to use is better than regurgitating [[CIA]]/[[Think tank]] &amp;amp; [[MSM]] talking points. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:52, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What the entire [[NATO-Russia proxy war]] has demonstrated over the past 3 years is, NATO weapons are [[crap]] and Russian weapons &amp;amp; technology are superior. This news has eluded most of the [[Western]] media consuming public who have been fed a steady diet of doggie doodoo since the war began. Furthermore, [[the West]]'s ability to respond is lacking, both in its (1) industrial capacity and lack of a factory skilled workforce, and (2) the psychological makeup of the populations to adjust to the new realities (it would take a Pearl Harbor or 9/11 moment, even a [[false flag]] attack, to wake them up; and it still would take years, if not decades to adjust). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:12, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Granted, one area the [[US]] has an edge is in the number of nuclear armed submarines. Russian air &amp;amp; naval resources are largely limited to Russia's coastal waters, so hunting them would be a problem. However, by the time the war got to that phase, we'd all be dead anyway, and much of North America and the Eurasian continent would be uninhabitable for the next 240,000 years. But, the US still maintains this advantage. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 04:23, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:[https://twitter.com/SputnikInt/status/1861463183304859666 HOW FAST CAN THE ORESHNIK MISSILE HIT US BASES ACROSS THE WORLD?] [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:57, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Middle East&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distance and flight time from southern Russia:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✈️ US airbase in Kuwait: 2,100 km, 11 minutes;  &lt;br /&gt;
✈️ 🚢 US 5th Fleet Headquarters in Bahrain: 2,500 km, 12 minutes;  &lt;br /&gt;
✈️ US Air Base in Qatar: 2,650 km, 13 minutes;  &lt;br /&gt;
✈️ US Air Base in Djibouti: 4,100 km, 20 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. Pacific and Alaska&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distance and flight time from Kamchatka:  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
✈️ Air Base in Alaska: 2,400 km, 12 minutes;  &lt;br /&gt;
✈️ US Air Force and Navy Base in Guam: 4,500 km, 22 minutes;  &lt;br /&gt;
✈️ 🚢 US Air Force and Navy Bases in Pearl Harbor: 5,100 km, 25 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3. Minuteman III missile silos&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distance and flight time from Chukotka (Arctic launch site):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
🎯 Minuteman III missile silos in Montana: 4,700 km, 23 minutes; &lt;br /&gt;
🎯 Minuteman III missile silos in Minot, North Dakota: 4,900 km, 24 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And remember: (a) Oreshnik can destroy these sites with or without nuclear warheads; (b) the US &amp;amp; NATO are defenseless against it (it would take years to catch up both offensive and defensive capabilities) and (c) bow and kiss the ring. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:03, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently, the [[Biden junta]]/[[NATO]] learned nothing from the destruction of Yuzhmash, cause they seem hell bent on provoking Russia to hit a NATO base (likely in Poland). [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:10, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:RobSmith, if you have the opinion that Russia's military hardware is excellent, I have no problem with that. It's a free country and you are certainly entitled to your opinion. As far as what I believe in this matter, I will take a look at Russia's military arms sales volume post war in Ukraine and see if it recovers from its current low as buyers of military hardware shop around and evaluate military hardware in terms of quality.[https://archive.is/te6LN] With that being said, &amp;quot;India has ordered 73,000 SIG battle rifles from the US and plans to acquire over 500 Stryker armored vehicles as well.&amp;quot;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJQIJbwrib4]  Also, According to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), the United States is currently the largest seller of military arms globally, holding the biggest market share in international arms exports.[https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2024-03/fs_2403_at_2023.pdf][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_industry] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:26, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, [https://www.vox.com/world-politics/2023/6/23/23770369/modi-india-weapons-arms-deal-drones-jet-engines Why the US is selling India so many weapons], 2023. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 17:29, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Oh, thanks for you [[narcissistic]] consent. Someday if you ever know what your talking about, I may listen. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:45, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::&amp;quot;According to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), the United States is currently the largest seller of military arms globally...&amp;quot;, as [[P.T. Barnum]] said, &amp;quot;There's a sucker born every minute&amp;quot;. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:54, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:See Ken, your citation to SIPRI is a prime example of having your head screwed on backwards. I pointed out how the past three years destroyed the myth of Western technological superiority in weapons development and manufacture. Everyone knows about the link and information you cite. Your citation is tedious and redundant. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:03, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Pepe Escobar]]: [https://thealtworld.com/pepe_escobar/trump-may-be-oreshniked-on-ukraine-even-before-he-gets-to-china]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|''Simple physics tells us that by combining enough kinetic force and mass, utter devastation is guaranteed, comparable to a low-to-medium yield nuclear weapon. With the added benefit of no radiation....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''To be concise: a system with the destructive power of a tactical nuclear weapon but carrying the precision of a top sniper’s bullet.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Ergo, sitting duck billion-dollar aircraft carriers; the whole, 800-plus Empire of Bases; assorted underground bunkers; ICBM launch platforms; naval shipyards; not to mention NATO’s HQ in Brussels, the Aegis Ashore base in Redzikowo (Poland), the NATO joint force center in the Netherlands, southern NATO command in Naples – all these immensely expensive assets are fair game for non-nuclear Oreshniks capable of reducing them to dust in a flash after flying for mere minutes at over Mach 10.''}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:04, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Russia’s new ballistic missile flies on a high arc out of Earth’s atmosphere and releases multiple high-speed projectiles, making it challenging but not impossible to intercept.&amp;quot; - [https://www.newscientist.com/article/2458117-how-could-ukraine-stop-russias-new-oreshnik-missile/ How could Ukraine stop Russia’s new Oreshnik missile?], New Scientist, 2024. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:11, November 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
MoA: [https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/11/how-the-new-russian-missiles-are-changing-the-game.html]&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;''The kinetic concept of the Oreshnik payload is not a new one. &amp;lt;s&amp;gt;Mass times speed is the amount of destructive energy these can deliver.&amp;lt;/s&amp;gt; [Comment correction for my sloppy writing: Force equals one half the mass multiplied by velocity squared. F = 1/2 m * v^2]  Being hypersonic and hitting the targets with a speed of Mach 10 allows even small penetrators without explosives to have very strong, explosive like effects.''&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
In layman's terms, the Oreshnik [https://kyivindependent.com/bild-russias-oreshnik-missile-that-targeted-dnipro-was-actually-modified-rubezh-missile/ doesn't even need an explosive warhead] (as the [[CIA]] [[propaganda]] rag ''[[The Kyiv Independent]]'' notes). Atmospheric friction from the speed of the missile rises to 4,000 degrees Celsius. Sheer force and velocity is enough to grind everything to powder. Oreshnik makes both conventional and nuclear missiles obsolete.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God forbid Biden and the neocons get the Russian's more PO'd and they decide to attach an explosive warhead just for the psychological Disney Dust effect to convince everybody it's real. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:43, December 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ashli Babbitt's killer got a $36,000 bonus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remember Ashli Babbitt? Capt. Michael Byrd, the police officer who shot her on January 6, got a $36,000 bonus afterwards. [https://nypost.com/author/miranda-devine/ Here's Miranda Divine]. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 09:29, November 25, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Did they explain why?[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 22:51, November 25, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Chuck Schumer must have been pleased with the shooting. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 10:04, November 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Chuck used to be more reasonable. By now he is a total embarrassment. Cowing to woke mob on all fronts. [[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 14:49, November 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Gorka gives it to the Islamist on RT - Afshin Rattansi: &amp;quot;palestine&amp;quot; name invented by Romans... ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He should have also said that the UN is occupied and dictated by the OIC Islamic lobby club of 59 Islam nations...&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.newsmax.com/politics/trump-security-maven-gorka-'no-such-thing-as-palestine/2024/11/25/id/1189311/ Trump Security Maven Gorka: 'No Such Thing as Palestine'].[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 22:50, November 25, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I booked Gorka for a leading podcast concerning one the books he wrote. I plan on working for the podcast again. Gorka wrote 3 books so theoretically, I can book him twice more. He was a pleasure to deal with. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you for this unintentional reminder. In the past few days, I was thinking about Gorka due to Trump winning. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 22:57, November 25, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::We don't need your unverified [[narcissistic]] boasting. Learn to use user talk pages properly. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:07, November 25, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Kudos to [[Sebastian Gorka|Gorka]]. No PC...[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 14:48, November 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[https://scheerpost.com/2024/11/27/john-kiriakou-sebastian-gorka-is-back/ John Kiriakou: Sebastian Gorka Is Back]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:45, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[Roger Stone]]: [https://rumble.com/v5ts0un-col.-douglas-macgregor-questions-the-appointment-of-sebastian-dorka.html Col. Douglas Macgregor Questions the Appointment of Sebastian Dorka]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:02, November 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== China is heading towards being a failed state ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UOgHTawMiMc China's Ageing Population: A Threat To Border Security &amp;amp; Economy | World Business Watch | WION], 2024&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's border regions are experiencing rapid population decline which will harm their border security. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britannica indicates that a failed state is one that “cannot protect its national boundaries&amp;quot;. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:26, November 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh wow. [[India]] is going to invade [[China]] now. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:38, November 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OMG! [https://citizenwatchreport.com/south-korea-faces-a-population-collapse-with-a-0-68-fertility-rate-in-2024-2-3-of-korea-will-disappear-every-generation/ South Korea faces a population collapse with a 0.68 fertility rate in 2024. 2/3 of Korea will disappear every generation.]&lt;br /&gt;
Several questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*Why do we risk the lives of 25,000 American troops stationed in South Korea to defend a state that's not going to exist in 2 or 3 generations?&lt;br /&gt;
*Why do we encourage and allow a nation that's not going to exist in a few years to facilitate [[World War III]] by supplying Ukraine with arms?&lt;br /&gt;
*What does this say about [[capitalism]], being that capitalism evidently had a hand in facilitating the destruction of South Korea?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Senior Admin says America is a failed state===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Britannica indicates that a failed state is one that “cannot protect its national boundaries&amp;quot;. Conservative (talk) 13:26, November 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:The USA can protect its borders. That is why Trump was elected in 2024. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Futhermore, &amp;quot;Britannica explained that a failed state is the one that “cannot protect its national boundaries.” April 26, 2023 head of the Russian Committee of defense of the Russian State Duma suggested that Russian citizens should be mobilized to protect Russian borders acknowledging that Russia has no resources for that, comparing the current inability of the state to the previous mighty USSR.&amp;quot; -  [https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/05/03/russia-has-failed-as-a-state/ Russia has failed as a state], Modern Diplomacy, 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In addition, the Ukrainians invading Russia in a surprise attack in the Kursk region of Russia in August of 2024 demonstrates that Russia cannot protect its border. To this day, the Ukrainians still occupy some territory in Kursk. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 10:07, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, 10 million invaded, human and drug trafficking exploded, civilians were murdered, and the US can protect its borders. OK, I'll remember that. Especially given the fact the US government facilitated the invasion. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:16, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*[https://t.me/ukr_leaks_eng/17620 In Vinnytsia region, a 57-year-old man stabbed the military commissar who tried to mobilize him.]&lt;br /&gt;
::So why are we pouring $200 billion into a failed state? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Is France a failed state? it couldn't defend its own borders in 1812, 1871, 1914, 1940 or even today. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:33, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::First, the Trump administration is going to deport the worst of the baddies first in his mass deportation (criminal gang members, other violent criminals, terror watch list, etc.) and I suspect some/many of the working illegal immigrants in farms, hotels, construction, etc, might escape deportation. Mass deportation isn't unprecedented in USA history and Eisenhower and Obama both did mass deportations. Furthermore, Trump is going to strengthen/complete the border wall. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unlike China/Russia, the USA does not have a people shortage related to protecting its national borders, and I cite:[https://foreignpolicy.com/2024/05/13/united-states-demographic-edge-china-russia-birthrates/ The United States Has a Keen Demographic Edge], May 13, 2024 and [https://www.polytechnique-insights.com/en/braincamps/geopolitics/do-demographics-still-weigh-in-on-geopolitics/demographics-in-the-us-are-a-source-of-power/ Demographics in the US are a source of power], Polytechnique Insights, Paris [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 12:50, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Hey, the subject, as you stated, is not what the Trump administration &amp;quot;is gonna do&amp;quot;. It's your assertion that the US is a failed state cause it can't defend its borders. &lt;br /&gt;
::::::If you don't believe that Trump is going to substantially make the illegal immigration situation better via mass deportation, finish building/expanding the wall and better border enforcement, I have no problem with that. We can agree to disagree. But Trump did a good job in his first term as far as illegal immigration issue. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:35, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Oh, that's how your brain works - you ignore [[fact]]s and create your own reality based on your fantasies about what the future should look like. How [[liberal]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:39, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unlike China and Russia, the nation of France has not experienced population loss in recent years. This is due to the country of France improving its fertility rate in recent years, various pro-natalist policies historically and due to immigration (France's population has grown since 2000).[https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/france-population/][https://ifstudies.org/press-release/pronatalist-policies-work][https://www.thegeographeronline.net/pro-natalist-policy-france.html] France and the United States have the most favorable demographics of the major powers. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:10, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Also, as time progresses, France is shifting more to the right on illegal immigration. &amp;quot;The newly formed French government plans to adopt another, tougher immigration bill next year, and leading the charge is hardline Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau. It is the latest in a series of moves under French President Emmanuel Macron to tackle immigration, a favourite talking point of the far right... Shortly after Bruno Retailleau took over as interior minister he made it clear he had a “law-and-order” agenda, vowing among other things to crack down on illegal immigration.&amp;quot;[https://www.france24.com/en/france/20241016-france-interior-minister-retailleau-charts-new-hardline-immigration-strategy]  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:30, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::bla bla bla. You're an idiot and anyone who reads your ridiculous [[spam]] is an idiot. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:32, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::::And if you don't see the stolen 2020 presidential election, road rage incidents and school shootings, per your own claims, as evidence of a failed state, you are [[trolling]] in addition to being an idiot. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:14, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===More drivel in support of NATO aggression===&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://citizenwatchreport.com/europe-is-dying-out-birthrates-are-rapidly-collapsing-government-incentives-arent-working-by-2100-europe-will-have-lost-117-million-people/ Europe is dying out. Birthrates are rapidly collapsing. Government incentives aren’t working. By 2100, Europe will have lost 117 million people.] &lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:52, November 29, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Islamofascist Hasan Piker calls for another 911massacre ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hasan Piker]] called for another [[Islamism|Islamic]] fascist [[911]] attack.[https://www.foxnews.com/us/fox-news-antisemitism-exposed-newsletter-twitch-star-rants-against-israel-calls-another-9-11 Fox News ‘Antisemitism Exposed’ Newsletter: Twitch star rants against Israel, calls for another 9/11].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:06, November 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:I think he also expressed terrible ideas in 2019. CNN had him on today. The left is that desperate that it will overlook his controversy.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 21:41, November 26, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not surprised at CNN but Burnett of ''Upfront'' was the less radical of the pack.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:57, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Newsom '28 campaign  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That's what it smells like anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://townhall.com/tipsheet/madelineleesman/2024/11/26/newsom-says-california-will-intervene-if-trump-gets-rid-of-ev-tax-credit-n2648258 Gavin Newsom Says California Will Intervene If Trump Reverses This Biden-Era Policy].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 16:04, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:What about the prospects of a Newscum-Harris face-off in the 2025 CA goobernatorial? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:30, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::There is talk of Harris for CA governor run, let's see, as it's still a humiliating fall for her from 2024 'hopeful' Prez.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 17:43, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's interesting; there may be a split developing the CA Democrat Party between the Pelosi heirs &amp;amp; faction and the [[Willie Brown]] heirs &amp;amp; faction, probably along identity politics and racial lines. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:48, November 27, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::As of now, the Dems. haven't figured out &amp;quot;what went wrong,&amp;quot; so the generational divide plays into it too.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Trump select Keith Kellogg as special envoy for Russia and Ukraine ==&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-selects-retired-general-keith-kellogg-special-envoy-russia-ukrai-rcna182056 Trump selects retired Gen. Keith Kellogg as special envoy to Russia, Ukraine]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump will appoint Keith Kellogg as special envoy for Russia and Ukraine for ceasefire. The negotiation peace deal would be hard between Ukraine and Russia. Keith Kellogg is 80 years old, I dont know why Trump choose him? --[[User:Alex Kosh|Alex Kosh]] ([[User talk:Alex Kosh|talk]]) 00:24, November 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Good question. Maybe cause [[Grenell]], who was touted, is [[gay]] and that wouldn't sit well with the Russian public if [[Putin]] made concessions. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:49, November 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Facts are, Russia has not agreed to any negotiations yet. And maybe this first round effort (scripted by Kellogg with a DMZ &amp;amp; NATO &amp;quot;Peacekeepers&amp;quot;, etc., which Moscow has already rejected out of hand), is just a charade doomed to fail. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Moscow's terms are pretty clear: they want to begin with overall European security talks and arms limitation talks. Ceasefire and border talks come later. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The only leverage Trump has is lifting sanctions (i.e. bribery). The US is out of money and out of weapons to escalate further. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 00:58, November 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
'''''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Breaking:'' [[Conservapedia:Rob proven right]]:&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
*'''[https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-envoy-proposes-peace-plan-172339690.html Peace plan proposed by Trump's envoy involves lifting sanctions against Russia – CNN], November 29, 2024.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:The facts are, [[Oreshnik]] is a creation of [[Donald Trump]]. Trump cancelled the [[INF Treaty]] at the behest of [[Pompeo]] &amp;amp; [[Bolton]] in 2019. IOWs, Trump didn't know what he was doing, and that greenlighted the Russians to go ahead and build new intermediate range missiles. Putin's been clear since that happened - arms limitation agreements &amp;amp; overall security agreements come first. But the Russians (Chinese and the rest of the planet) no longer have any trust in the [[United States]], which abandons international treaties at will based on America's domestic politics, which change every four years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:06, November 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The whole planet is beginning to speak with one voice: they are tired of their peace and security being dependent on a bunch of American [[Midwest]]erners who don't understand and are not interested in the people of the rest of the planet. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:11, November 28, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Uh, Putin not a guy known for following international treaties. Why would he follow INF regardless of what Trump did? [https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/11/28/how-far-can-russias-ruble-fall-amid-its-latest-tumble-a87158 The drop in the value ruble may be a result Ukraine's decision to cut off pipeline access]. Trump could send Ukraine a lot more artillery shells if he invokes the Defense Production Act. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 09:23, November 29, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::It's a bit late for that. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:24, November 29, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::What does this mean? Putin is on his way to Berlin or Paris or whatever? Who needs an internationally traded currency anyway? With trading suspended, the current value of the ruble is anybody's guess. The black market rate in St. Petersburg is said to be 400 rubles to one dollar. The finance minister's response to the collapse of the ruble is to claim that its a boon for exporters. Russia already has a labor shortage, and the solution is to export more? That's not how economics works. Its only a matter of time before Ukraine takes out the Kerch bridge with an ATACMS. [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
:::::What does &amp;quot;Putin is on his way to Berlin or Paris or whatever&amp;quot; mean? That's a parody of [[Western]] [[fake news]] &amp;amp; [[propaganda]] - that Putin &amp;quot;won't stop at Ukraine&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;wants to conquer Europe&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;wants to recreate the USSR&amp;quot;, etc. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:13, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::PeterKa, thanks for pointing out the black market value of the ruble is said to be 400 rubles to one dollar. That's a great point. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 02:57, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::PeterKa, the Russian ruble falling is merely the tip of the iceberg of economic perils that Russia is heading towards as can be seen at: [https://www.newstatesman.com/business/economics/2024/11/russias-economy-is-doomed Russia’s economy is doomed], November 28, 2024. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User trealk:Conservative|talk]]) 03:08, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::PeterKa, I couldn't confirm your statement about the black market value of the Russian ruble. However, I did find this: &amp;quot;The ruble also weakened against China’s yuan, which is still traded on the Moscow Exchange. The ruble fell below the mark of 15 per yuan on Wednesday, the first time since March 2022. “The market related to the exchange of the Russian ruble is segmented and illiquid,” economist Sofia Donets said. “For now, the most reliable indicator of the exchange rate is probably the yuan exchange rate. The imputed rate, if we look at the cross rate of the yuan to the dollar, is now closer to 108, but the reality of rapid weakening [of ruble] is evident.” - [https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2024/11/28/how-far-can-russias-ruble-fall-amid-its-latest-tumble-a87158 How Far Can Russia’s Ruble Fall Amid Its Latest Tumble?], Nov. 28, 2024. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:19, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::Also, see: [https://www.google.com/search?q=russian+ruble+to+chinese+yuan&amp;amp;oq=russian+ruble+to+chinese+yuan&amp;amp;gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyDggAEEUYORhGGIICGIAEMggIARAAGBYYHjIICAIQABgWGB4yCAgDEAAYFhgeMggIBBAAGBYYHjIICAUQABgWGB4yDQgGEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgHEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyDQgIEAAYhgMYgAQYigUyBggJEC4YQNIBCTEwNzk4ajBqMagCALACAA&amp;amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8 Russian Ruble to Chinese Yuan exchange rate chart]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 04:21, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::[[Keith Kellogg]], ''[https://americafirstpolicy.com/issues/america-first-russia-ukraine America First, Russia, &amp;amp; Ukraine]'':&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The war in Ukraine is an avoidable tragedy that resulted from President Biden’s incompetence as a world leader and his chaotic foreign policy...Biden’s repeated statements that he was prepared to send arms to Ukraine “for as long as it takes” without providing a strategy for Ukraine to win the war or a plan to end the conflict epitomized the real intention of his policy to use the conflict as a U.S. proxy war against Russia.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Andy needs to implement a [[Topic ban]] on [[User:Conservative]] so that I can resume reporting on the conflict and [[American foreign policy]]. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:14, November 29, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Strong dollar is the result of China &amp;amp; EU lowering the value of their own currencies==&lt;br /&gt;
as the result of Trump's election, and not inherent to the dollar itself. [https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/11/30/with-the-dollar-strengthening-and-with-easily-predictable-economic-outcomes-looming-president-trump-targets-brics/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's ephemeral. Everything can flip again in four years. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:12, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trump's threat of 100% tariffs (a) do not deny access to American markets; (b) does not address the loss of foreign investor confidence in the dollar after the seizure of Russia's sovereign assets. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:14, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]]: &amp;quot;Fears steep U.S. tariffs could tip China's economy into recession.&amp;quot; Is this supposed to be a positive thing? Creating hunger, misery, and starvation? And you somehow think a [[recession]] in China won't affect the [[United States]]? Your reasoning is childish. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:35, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== NYC is now home to over 58K ‘criminal’ migrants — including more than 1,000 gang members ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NYC is now home to over 58K ‘criminal’ migrants — including more than 1,000 gang members: ICE&lt;br /&gt;
[https://nypost.com/2024/11/30/us-news/nyc-is-now-home-to-over-58k-criminal-migrants-including-over-1000-gang-members-ice/ nyp]. Ata boy Biden with his czar - Harris.[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:54, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Colorado Islamic Scholar Karim Abu Zayd: Hadith Predicts Islam Will Conquer Europe, America and China Will Fall, and the Mahdi Will Lead Muslims to Conquer the Vatican. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At least this one is honest...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
_&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;In his November 17, 2024 lesson on Islamic eschatology, Colorado Islamic scholar Karim Abu Zayd discussed prophecies stating that Islam would enter every home on Earth, and that America and China would fall, with Muslims ultimately conquering Europe. He remarked that Muslims who have emigrated from the East can see how the prophecy of Islam entering every home is “almost realized.” In response to a caller from California, asking about the authenticity of the hadith according to which the Muslims would conquer the Vatican, Abu Zayd responded that the hadith is authentic, and it uses the word, “Rome” to refer to Europe, which includes Italy and the Vatican as well, when the Mahdi arrives. The lesson was streamed live on Abu Zayd’s YouTube channel.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.memri.org/tv/colorado-islamic-scholar-karim-abu-zayd-hadith-conquer-europe-america].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:44, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In 2001, [[Putin]] wanted to join forces with the [[US]] to fight radical Islamic terrorism and to keep [[China]] in check; the US rejected Putin's offer and granted China [[Most Favored Nation]] trading status.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:That's the weakness of our system - inconsistent [[foreign policy]] that changes every four years with the whim of [[voter]]s and domestic [[partisan]]ship. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:51, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Systems that are more dynamic respond to the ever changing environment. Research indicates that in the long-term, non-[[authoritarianism|authoritarian]] countries are more likely to experience greater economic growth (See: [https://www.cato.org/commentary/no-autocracies-dont-make-economies-great No, Autocracies Don’t Make Economies Great], Cato Institute, 2021 and [https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1010748 Time Under Authoritarian Rule and Economic Growth], CORI Working Paper No. 2007-02). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:12, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::We live in a world that is often characterized by volatility, uncertainty, and complexity. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]])&lt;br /&gt;
::::Wow. How profound. So it was a Republican president who rejected Putin's offer for help in the [[War on Terror]] (maybe if [[Baby Bush]] accepted it, we would have won that war) and a GOP Congress that granted [[Communist China]] [[Most Favored Nation]] status that made China rich (while destroying [[America]]'s industrial base and jobs) and gave them the ability, courtesy of American consumers, to upgrade their [[military]] which supposedly makes them a big threat now. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::There, I gave you enough substance for more writing projects. Why don't you concentrate on those [[foreign policy]] aspects instead of your [[BS]] [[trolling]] of me personally? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:27, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
Win the War on Terrorism? Islamic terrorism may always exist. It's been around since the 1970s and often the most fervent Islamists have the most children. Also, there is this data: &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.virtueonline.org/what-islam-isnt-dr-peter-hammond What Islam Isn't - Dr. Peter Hammond]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Islam has a violent streak which can be seen in its history. &amp;quot;It’s also interesting to note that more than half of these religious wars, sixty-six in all, were waged by Islamic nations, which is rather more than might be statistically expected considering that the first war in which Islam was involved took place almost three millennia after the first war chronicled in the Encyclopedia, Akkad’s conquest of Sumer in 2325 B.C.&lt;br /&gt;
In light of this evidence, the fact that a specific religion is currently sparking a great deal of conflict around the globe cannot reasonably be used to indict all religious faith, especially when one considers that removing that single religion from the equation means that all of the other religious faiths combined only account for 3.35 percent of humanity’s wars&amp;quot;. (Book source: The Irrational Atheist). [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 21:35, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Why don't you address the point: Why don't you write on how a Congress &amp;amp; President elected by [[conservative Christian]]s (a) failed to defeat radical Islamic terrorism after rejecting [[Vladimir Putin]]'s offer to help, and (b) a Congress &amp;amp; President elected by [[conservative Christian]]s destroyed American jobs, made [[Communist China]] rich, destroyed America's industrial base and America's ability to wage modern industrial war, and built the Chinese military by buying cheap Chinese manufactured goods from [[Wal Mart]]? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This goes to the heart of the [[MAGA movement]]. Trump said, &amp;quot;Our leaders are stupid&amp;quot;, which includes the [[GOP establishment]]. But all you do is shill for the [[globalist]] [[deep state]] by [[trolling]] and attacking me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:36, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And now, to top it all off, the [[Taliban]], which was organized by the [[CIA]] as the [[Mujahadeen]] in the 1980s to fight the USSR and was victorious in the [[Afghan war]], the Russian Federation is opening diplomatic talks with and taking them off its list of Terrorist organizations. Meanwhile, the [[US]] was defeated by its own terrorist monster that it created and gave them $83 billion in modern military equipment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It seems that a sophisticated student of international affairs &amp;amp; [[geopolitics]], such has yourself, has so much more that you could be contributing to rather than the [[trolling]] tripe and childish nonsense you spew to [[troll]] and attack me. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:43, November 30, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Remember? They called Trump a &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; for his toughness on immigration from certain troubled countries...[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]])•&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Let's pray they don't make him disappear ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.memri.org/tv/lebanon-academic-imad-chamoun-palestine-jews-holy-land-quran] Lebanese Academic Imad Chamoun: Palestinians Have No Right To The Holy Land, ‘Palestine’ Was Not Even Mentioned In The Quran; It Belongs To The Jews; Hizbullah Threatens To Cut Off The Heads Of Lebanese Christians When They Are Done With Israel.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 13:03, December 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will the [[United States]] pay [[Putin]] [https://youtu.be/DlROZMRQ0sE the $10 million bounty they had on Al-Julani] whom Putin just whacked? [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:27, December 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Just as to those that have eliminated [[Fuad Shukr]]?[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 19:15, December 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Yah. Well, it wouldn't be the first time the US welched on a commitment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::You seen this? [https://t.me/levangudadzeopinion/24100 Syrian sources report that thousands of Iraqi Shia fighters from the Popular Mobilization Forces are mobilizing towards Syria.] Could be, they're being baited into a trap.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Also, thanks and good job in getting the [[HTS]] started. It'll be used on MPR. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:30, December 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Let's see how this plays out. Many locals, who are not islamists, cheer for the rebels. [https://t.me/englishabuali/40435 Druze in A-Suwayda celebrate the successes of the Rebels across the country: &amp;quot;Good news from Aleppo, Hama, Daraa].[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 20:01, December 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Yah. I saw an interview with a Christian lady in Aleppo who said how wonderful the terrorists are. It seemed like they speak some strange mixture of French &amp;amp; Arabic. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:42, December 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I believe, in Idlib is their highest popularity because of anti Assad sentiments. An observation, it might be that they sped up op. because Tulsi is perceived as pro Assad[[User:Telling|Telling]] ([[User talk:Telling|talk]]) 00:20, December 2, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::Sounds very plausible. And Aleppo is a much larger city than most people imagine. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 01:48, December 2, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit needed ==&lt;br /&gt;
On the most recent article about tariffs, BRICS should be in all caps as it is an acronym. [[User:Quidam65|Quidam65]] ([[User talk:Quidam65|talk]]) 18:07, December 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's fixed. Thanks. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:27, December 1, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential Pardon==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“There has been an effort to break Trump — who has been sober his whole life, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did Biden really say that? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:24, December 2, 2024 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2087455</id>
		<title>User talk:Ed Poor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2087455"/>
		<updated>2024-11-23T17:29:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: to Rob&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Archive: &lt;br /&gt;
[[/1|1]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/2|2]] &lt;br /&gt;
[[/3|3]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/4|4]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/5|5]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/6|6]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/7|7]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/8|8]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/9|9]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/10|10]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/11|11]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/12|12]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/13|13]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/14|14]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/15|15]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/16|16]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/17|17]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/18|18]]&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ed poor grinning.jpg|right|thumb|114px|Ed Poor on campus]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- New comments at the bottom, please. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writing Plan ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
I would like to submit a writing plan. While I haven't been asked for one, I feel this would best help keep me on task and contribute the most productively. You seem to know an awful lot about this wiki stuff, and I'm still new at it, so if you could help me that would be great.&lt;br /&gt;
I think I'd first like to help contribute to the various book articles around the site by adding in examples of the influence of Christianity, as a lot of books have Christian overtones that aren't currently listed. I'm thinking I'd like to start by drawing parallels between the story of Jesus in the Gospels with One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Please let me know if this would be acceptable.--[[User:JeremiahJ|JeremiahJ]] 18:10, 6 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Probably not. Please email me a draft. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:02, 17 January 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Mr. Poor, I have submitted a request [[Talk:Atheism#Addition_of_Information_on_Charity_and_External_Links_Request|here]] but it was never attended to. Could you please have a look at it? Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:19, 28 February 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Image Upload Request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
I am new here. Can you upload these images please.&lt;br /&gt;
https://puresocialnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/PA-Reg-Trends-1024x576.png&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.wikispeedia.org/seth_keshel_photo_2021-07-11_17-39-09.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
Also, I create Seth_Keshel page, but today its gone. Not sure how to proceed.&lt;br /&gt;
-James Pruett&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed Poor, I hope this message finds you doing well. I was wondering if you could upload [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Young_Galaxy_Accreting_Material.jpg this image] for use in the article I recently created. I look forward to hearing your response. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 03:32, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Hello Ed Poor, could you please add [[Atheism and the suppression of science]] to [[Template:Nb Atheism|this template]]? I really appreciate it! With regards, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:14, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Hello Ed Poor, I need two more images for the article I created which are available [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Independent_assortment_%26_segregation.svg here] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:John_Lennox.jpg here]. Recently, [[User:JMR10]] uploaded my previous one, for which I am thankful. Could you ask him to do the same for these two or could you please do these for me? I highly appreciate it. Thanks, [[User:Anupam|Anupam]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Anupam|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:40, 7 March 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I seem to have messed up the Ada article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My proxy keeps dropping stuff, so the picture at the top is busted.  Also, I had to cut down the reference, because the captcha can't make it through.  It should have a left bracket, and h,t,t,p, etc., and a right bracket after the &amp;quot;pdf&amp;quot;. I wonder if you could please fix it for me.  I will contact Andy about getting my IP range restored.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I was going to put in the talk page (and will do once things get straightened out) is that the two cited articles are very shallow, having only 7 and 3 sentences, respectively.  They both refer to a &amp;quot;plan&amp;quot;, but that's because the word &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been coined in the computer context.  She really was the first person to write &amp;quot;code&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry about this.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:08, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I read her notes, and it doesn't look like a [[computer program]] to me. A charitable view might be that it's a [[specification|spec]], but there's no flowchart and no [[source code]]. Don't be sorry, just get it right. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:21, 5 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What did you expect this &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; to look like?  The term &amp;quot;source code&amp;quot; implies both a programming language and &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot; that the source code is assembled or compiled into.  Assemblers, compilers, and programming languages wouldn't be invented for another hundred years (by Grace Murray Hopper, John Backus, and others.)  The same goes for the other accoutrements of modern software development, like flow charts and specifications.  In fact, even the terms &amp;quot;software&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;program&amp;quot; hadn't been invented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, assuming that you accept that she had to write &amp;quot;machine code&amp;quot;, what would you expect machine code to look like for a machine that reads its instructions with rods poking through holes in large punched cards running around on a track, and does its arithmetic by counting teeth on turning gears?  It wouldn't look much like Intel 586 code.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fact is, the lines of Ada's written algorithm were intended to be punched into lines of holes in Babbage's cards, once the &amp;quot;analytical engine&amp;quot; was built, which it wasn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, what I was being &amp;quot;sorry&amp;quot; for was not the content of my edit, but the fact that an extremely buggy proxy messed up the article and wouldn't let me fix it, despite several tries.  Andy has been working with me to fix the network problems, and DMorris fixed the broken picture and hyperlink while my access was broken.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 20:39, 6 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Then it would be more accurate to say that she described an algorithm. That's not the same as a computer program, even if she was hoping that Babbage's machine might be programmed to carry out the algorithm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:An encyclopedia should be precise and unbiased, not used to create &amp;quot;factoids&amp;quot; for use in publicity campaigns, such as promoting [[women in science]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I don't say she had to write machine code, but rather to be the &amp;quot;first programmer&amp;quot; she would have had to produce a [[computer program]]. If you have seen it, please show it to me. Otherwise, I'm going to make an editorial decision that she produced an algorithm rather than a program. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:18, 7 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Let's say that [[Ada Lovelace]] wrote one of the first comprehensive descriptions of an algorithm to generate [[Bernoulli numbers]]. But until I see the actual sequence of instructions, including [[if-then]] or [[loop control]] statements, I'd hesitate to call it an actual [[computer program]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:17, 17 May 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The anti-Semitism of liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
I love how libs reveal their true selves.  No matter what we say or do in describing them, they come here just to confirm it all.  So when they want to emphasize &amp;quot;Jew&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;karajou&amp;quot;, I'll be more then happy to get a gold Magen David to wear around my neck, join my brothers and sisters in the synagogue every week, and show everyone else just how hate-filled and intolerant these liberals really are.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:20, 12 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please help! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi! I tried to add the information for Edo to the Tokyo article and for some reason,. it stripped a bunch of stuff out when I saved. Now when I try and revert the edit I made, I keep getting a internal server 500 error. Please can you revert for me? [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:19, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:It's ok, I fixed it! [[User:TracyS|TracyS]] 10:30, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm glad it worked out for you. My Japanese name is &amp;quot;Edo&amp;quot;. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:04, 14 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice speed on reverts ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You beat me to every one! Nicely done--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 20:05, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks. I'll pass that on to my secret bot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:10, 24 April 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks for noticing me ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must be doing something right. Every time I mention alternate viewpoints, and no one sees fit to revert my edits, I get vandalism to my talk page. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:48, 10 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Jeb Bush ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm trying to reorganize the information, not leave it out. If you notice, I'm working on the article quite a bit. May I please revert your revision? [[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 15:05, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sure. I'm frequently too bold and hasty. And that's the wonderful thing about a wiki. Nothing is ever really deleted; it's all in the article history. Go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:09, 14 June 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technical question ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm lobbying for a separate namespace for the Conservapedia Bible Project. The idea is that each verse gets its own ''article'', which can be used rather as a template. I see a couple of advantages:&lt;br /&gt;
*verses can be quoted more easily: instead of copying the whole verse, only a short link (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; ) is neccessary to get a neat result: &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{:CBP:John 20:8}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*thereby, the use of the CBP is encouraged over other translations.&lt;br /&gt;
*if there is a change in the CBP, the afflicted verses don't have to be tracked down manually, but the change is applied automatically throughout the wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To accomplish this, a new namespace has to be created. That shouldn't be too difficult, as there are only a few exemplary pages prefixed with ''CBP:'' at this moment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But after this, the namespace has to be filled with the existing translated verses. My question: is your bot up to this task?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 10:53, 8 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== madonna ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi, please strongly reconsider your desire to create a &amp;quot;kinder article.&amp;quot; In stating that madonna is a person who has changed to being more spiritual you are buying to the liberal media's lies. It sounds like a madonna fan attempting to weave their bias in, which of course you are not. I think you may want to do more research, and read my recent additions as she is still, if not more so, a wicked and hateful person who has sucked millions of children into raunchy culture, dated murderers and mocked our Lord Jesus Christ who gave his life for us. Madonna deserves only the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:14, 14 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:And I just had a long conversation with some Wikipedians in Central Park last month, about whether CP is more neutral than WP. Now you want &amp;quot;conservative bias&amp;quot; to denounce [[Madonna Ciccone]]? Not even Wikipedia's BLP policy would allow that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I wonder whether you are a liberal '''tempting me''' to add bias, just so you can accuse us of being biased. Well, if so, I choose not to cooperate, my dear elf. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:45, 14 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think Legolas here might be a parodist. Would you mind looking into him? [[User:NickP|NickP]] 00:12, 15 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, your compassion sounds a little misplaced to me. Do you also visit the Fred Phelps, Bernie Madoff, Ted Bundy, and Charles Manson pages asking people for some &amp;quot;Christian charity&amp;quot; to tone those down too? Look into me all you want please. I dislike Madonna because she has mocked our lord Jesus Christ. Conservative people have respect for Christ end of story. The reason society has degraded is by giving raunchy people like madonna a free pass and pity. I'm the one who wants to print the ACTUAL history of madonna that the liberal media has left out such her dating the felon Chris Paciello. I only want the truth about her in the article. Why is that so bad? I thought this was the one place that might allow the truth.[[User:Legolas2186|Legolas2186]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Legolas2186|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:34, 17 July 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:Ed, can you please look into this guy? He is an obvious parodist. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 15:55, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
First of all - Ed is a senior sysop at this site - I don't know why a few of you have taken upon yourself to post on [[User talk:Aschlafly|Andy's talk page]] when Ed is more than capable of dealing with an alleged parodist on his own. Secondly, just because he is posting radical things on a talk page does not make him a parodist. Looking at his contributions, you ''could'' argue that he is edit warring, but since Ed is simultaneously the user in the revert war and an admin, it is up to his judgement as to whether or not a block is deserving. Your collective alarmism has now spread across three talk pages. That's enough.--&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[[User:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;I]][[User_talk:Iduan|&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Duan]]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; 16:00, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::@NickP, your very.... quick to call somebody else a parodist. Why not leave that to the pro.'s to decide?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:06, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Several others have also pointed out the fact that he acts very suspicious. [[User:NickP|NickP]] 16:13, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Saying he &amp;quot;acts suspicious&amp;quot; and saying he's a 100% no way im wrong about this Parodist is two completely different things.--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 16:16, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::I prefer what Wikipedia old-timers used to call &amp;quot;soft security&amp;quot;. Just help me fix the articles in question. Everything will sort itself out. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:34, 17 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==EdBot==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I left three (actually six) problem Categories that need some sort of merging at [[User_talk:EdBot]]. Thanks.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:56, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, EdBot did not survive the MediaWiki upgrades. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:21, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Does that mean it's all got to be done manually? Moving 200 entries into another Category?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Only if they really have to be moved. (Meanwhile, if anyone has an idea how a bot can &amp;quot;log in&amp;quot; with the new MediaWiki software, let me know.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:33, 18 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot#Logging_in This] should help. Indeed, the whole [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Creating_a_bot page] is quite interesting. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:40, 19 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A request concerning recent events ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm very sorry to come to you with this, but I honestly don't know where else to turn at this point.  You have always struck me as the voice of reason and level-headedness here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Simply put: the current altercation on Andy's talk page is out of control.  I recognize that I have no authority to tell sysops what they should or shouldn't do, but it seems to me that basic common courtesy calls for not filling up Andy's talk page with arguments and accusations.  Moreover, the very public nature of the dispute is encouraging other users to join in.  Some of them are doubtless sincere; others, I suspect, may in fact be parodists seeking to fan the flames (I notice a LOT of recently created accounts.) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regardless, the fact remains that Andy's talk page has been turned into a general forum for accusations and arguments.   At this point, it's degenerated to the level where people are making absolutely vicious personal attacks against certain of the participants.  (Kudos to JamesWilson for promptly reverting the most egregious of these.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know the other sysops better than most of us; you talk to them; I would certainly hope they trust and respect your opinion.  Is there anything you can do to persuade them to take a step back, cool down, and wait for Andy to respond at this point?  Everyone involved has made their positions clear; further acrimony can serve no useful purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry to trouble you with this, but I really feel that this is both inconsiderate to Andy and deleterious to the Conservapedia project as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Respectfully,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Benp|Benp]] 13:05, 28 July 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks for the vote of confidence, but shouldn't I check with Andy before barging in? It may be that he prefers to let everyone air their opinions. It is not just his courage but his wisdom and compassion that attracted me to this project. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:59, 5 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[User:MRellek]]==&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, per the site owner, Administrators [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Conservapedia:Guidelines&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=892763 &amp;quot;instructions...are to be followed&amp;quot;] is no longer operable. I have emailed you a copy of Mr. Schlafly's approval.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 13:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, sorry. I was hasty. Feel free to unban MRellek, if you feel I was out of line. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:32, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you, Ed. I'm trying to get the other sysops to do more warnings &amp;amp; shorter blocks; let's get a sense of community here. After all, we've known many of these editors (the RW neighbors) for several years now.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 15:37, 6 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please let me know if you want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel. I invited someone to edit Conservapedia and they were blocked and they should not have been. I got the block overturned. So I think there is room for improvement in Conservapedia's blocking policy. You can sign up [[User:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. I invited active Syops/Admins plus people with blocking rights who might wish to be Sysops. If I left anyone out, please let them know about the panel.  The people with blocking rights can sign up [[User talk:Conservative/Sysops who want to serve on a blocking policy refinement panel|HERE]]. The panel will probably convene when Iduan is back from his summer vacation or fairly soon afterwards.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:47, 13 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think I got signed up somehow, after jumping into a discussion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can we have non-sysops on the panel? I'd like to invite a friend from Wikipedia to join it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:00, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== If I understand correctly, you are the local math expert. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If so, maybe you can take a look at [[Relativistic mass|this]] and some of that editor's other contributions. They seem pretty obscure/specialized for the general reader, to me, at least. Thanks! [[User:MrMorganH|MrMorganH]] 10:15, 14 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not an expert, but I know a lot about high school math. Andy's brother knows much more than I do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:55, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Revert ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good morning (afternoon?) Ed, why was my comment reverted? I can't see why it should be? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:54, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Gosh, you're quick on the trigger. See your talk page for my response. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:58, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I am indeed quick on the trigger, I like Westerns you see..:-)  I have responded to you on my talk-page and re asked the question in a more cordial manner. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:59, 16 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Conservapedia  Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings have begun ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The panel proceeding have begun here:  [[Conservapedia:Blocking policy refinement panel proceedings]] You can start making your edits to the page should you wish to do so.  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:59, 17 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Farewell ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, in all sincerity you are by far the most interesting person I have met at Conservapedia.  I regret that we couldn't get along better, though we did manage to improve a number of things.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:12, 18 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We'd have gotten along better if we more goals in common. Building a trustworthy encyclopedia apparently was not one of them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=893745 this drive by attack] you dodged my request for specific instances of the problem you complained of. (Note: saying &amp;quot;all of them&amp;quot; is a a typical liberal dodge. That's like global warming alarmists saying, &amp;quot;Just look at the temperature record; the evidence is all there.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For those listening in to this fascinating drama, the difference between real science and liberal junk science is that real scientists provide examples of what they're talking about, so that anyone can check it out and see for themselves. Liberals and other pseudoscientists '''pretend''' that they've already made the point.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It reminds me of Japan, which always (1) says that it &amp;quot;already apologized&amp;quot; for the [[comfort women]] episode while steadfastly (2) refusing ever to admit that it did anything wrong. They are hoping we'll all be too polite to mention that #1 contradicts #2. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nice try on the parting shot, but your pretense of trying oh so hard fools no one. You're always welcome to come back if you '''ever''' choose to help this project instead of undermining it with trickery. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:41, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pontiac==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for your help archiving my page.  I know you are very experienced with Wikis, but I was wondering why you removed what I wrote about the government shut down of Pontiac destroying American history.  A lot of people were really upset about Pontiac's closure and there are lots of websites and articles proving this, why can't it be in the article?  I will differ to your judgement because you are so experienced, but just want to understand your reasoning. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 22:46, 19 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It can't be in the article until you find a way to make it trustworthy. Use references. You can't just write stuff off the top of your head, because you are not an established author. You are in fact an anonymous person, and we don't even know whether Craig is your real name. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If there's a lot of proof for your assertion, be sure to provide references, like:&lt;br /&gt;
:*The New York Times reported that after GM was taken over by the government, brands like Saturn and Pontiac were sold or eliminated (link and/or date)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you need help formatting references, lots of people here can help. But '''you''' must supply them. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:43, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Pictures==&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, how do I add pictures?  --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 16:08, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can't add pictures, until you've made enough useful contributions to earn upload rights. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:34, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::In addition, Craig, you can use [[Conservapedia:Image upload requests]] until you earn uploading privileges. A Sysop will do it for you.--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 21:59, 20 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ok, I'll work even harder to earn my rights!   I also wanted to apologize for being so familiar, my mom pointed out that I should be calling you Mr. Poor. I always call adults by their last names in real life, but on the internet I usually forget.  Also thanks Mr. Wilson for your advice about upload requests. --[[User:CraigF|CraigF]] 13:24, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::No worries. I wouldn't mind if you called me James or Jim, but I'm glad your mother has taught you well. Also, you will need a lot more work to earn uploading privileges, just so you know. Happy editing in the meantime!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 14:21, 21 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edit conflict ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just got edit conflicted by you on the Morse code page - what are the odds we'd both be working on it! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:19, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:One thought leads to another ... not such long odds. Sorry about stepping on your work. Feel free to revert, and I'll recover later. :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:22, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Its all OK, I added my work to your version. Great minds think alike, more like an average mind in my case but you catch my drift...:-) [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:24, 24 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== signature ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you don't mind, but I borrowed the format of your signature to use for my own. It's simple and to the point, but looks nice as well, so I thought I would use it as well. Thank you! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:02, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I copied mine from someone else, so &amp;quot;[[Pay It Forward]].&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:27, 27 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Oh, ok. Thanks for letting me know! [[User:KevinDavis|KevinDavis]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:KevinDavis|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:23, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== like wikipedia? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i looked up [[milk]] and [[butter]] how is this conserivtive? is it like wikipedia at all what can i add? ty. --[[User:Rainbowboiz|Rainbowboiz]] 00:35, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not unless your spelling improves. And we are not so much &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; as [[trustworthy]]. Unlike Wikipedia, we really do try to avoid political bias. Add anything that is correct and useful. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:17, 28 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meat Loaf ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know his stage name is much better known (I'm writing the article on him, obviously), but wouldn't you think using the subject's real name is more appropriate for an encyclopedia? If you think the article should be titled under his stage name, you're the boss, but I thought I might want to point that out. Thanks!--[[User:JamesWilson|JamesWilson]] 11:14, 1 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me as I am fairly new to this wiki.  I have attempted to propose a discussion for deletion on this particular page.  Before disccussing this, I have followed the instructions on templates via the help index [[http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservapedia:Articles_for_deletion]] to add it to a discussion for deletion but this does not seem to work so I have not proceded further - with hindsight I should have guessed there was something wrong by the lack of entries on this page.  &lt;br /&gt;
My reason for wishing to commence this discussion is that I suspect the article (created by a user who does not appear to have an active talk page) seems to me to be parody and trolling to debase the credibility of this project.  In my opinion, most of the logic followed in nearly every assertion is spurious and often uses blatant synthesis that a ten year old could question.  It is to such an extent that I don't think an &amp;quot;improved&amp;quot; version would be posible.  Of course, others may have different oppinions which is why I am trying to be fair and open it for rational discussion.  What is the correct procedure?  Thank you in advance - answer to my talk page [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 19:54, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm not sure what the correct procedure is. Maybe you could post on the talk page, showing a few examples of &amp;quot;spurious&amp;quot; assertions. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:46, 7 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Ok I can do this, but I'm surprised that hte Help feature supplies a redundant page on discoussing articles for deletion.  I was also under the impression that you had Sysop/Admin powers and would be familiar with such policies as it is a feature on other wikis.  [[User:DavidMilton|DavidMilton]] 13:31, 8 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Actually I know policy fairly well and do have Sysop/Admin powers. Either provide the requested examples, or drop the matter. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:47, 10 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sid 3050 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sid 3050 was blocked for three month for ''trolling''. The only edit he made during the day before his block seems to be to answer to your question in a section above (''So, will it go away if you ignore it?'') - see his [[Special:Contributions/Sid 3050|list of contributions]]. You had personally addressed this comment (''But I'll take a look at Sid's material below now, just to be a good sport.''), so you should be able to judge whether such a comment is ''trolling''. Could you please review Sid's block? In a timely fashion? Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 09:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sid was trolling. Whether this justifies a three month block is up to the admin in question. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm always open to suggestions for making Conservapedia more trustworthy. If you have anything specific in mind, please speak up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Of particular interest to me would be any material relating to the contrast between conservative and liberal viewpoints on American political issues, as well as philosophy, religion and science. To my regret, repeated invitations to include users who are ideological opponents of this project have not met with an enthusiastic response. It's almost as if they wish to conceal their ideological differences; ironically, this could be seen as self-censorship. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If anyone wants to describe liberal POV here they may, provided only that it is clearly labeled as such - not presented as gospel. This should not be an onerous requirement: it's the same as Wikipedia's NPOV policy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:42, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Vandalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Help! A user called CortA is currently vandalising articles. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:15, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:OK, Andy blocked him. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 13:17, 15 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Misled by RonLar ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was quite astonished by your last actions. I slept over it and want to clarify my earlier remark.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I'd appreciate if you would be less generous with your slight innuendos (''&amp;quot;thanks for nothing!&amp;quot;'', ''&amp;quot;misled by RonLar&amp;quot;''): these make it difficult to assume ''good faith'' on your side. And they have the annoying tendency to backfire...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*my statement ''&amp;quot;Where is the right place to propose an alternative viewpoint? Surely not in the article itself, but on its talk-page. This is a simple necessity for all protected articles, but a good idea for most of those articles some sysops feel strongly about.&amp;quot;'' is hardly misleading - even though it is not written by a native speaker! In fact, it is echoing the sentiments of Conservapedia's [[Conservapedia:Editing etiquette|editing etiquettes]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should discuss changes made by an Administrator before reverting their edits. Administrators are charged with seeing that article content is in line with Conservapedia guidelines. [[Edit war]]ring with an Administrator usually results in a temporary block.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::* '''You should not alter the editorial content of an article away from a [[conservative]], or [[Christian]], or [[family friendly]] &amp;quot;tone&amp;quot; without discussing proposed changes on the talk page.'''&lt;br /&gt;
:::*'''Never make substantial edits to an article without discussing your changes first on the talk page. If you have a reasonable expectation that other editors will accept your change(s), the changes are just formatting / copy editing, you should proceed.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inserting an alternative viewpoint is most certainly a ''substantial edit'' - and the etiquettes advise you to discuss such an edit at first on the talk-page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*So, I made a true statement, in accordance with Conservapedia's policy on editing, and you '''misread''' it. To reiterate: You weren't '''misled''', you simply '''misread''' it. And this misunderstanding (of your part) you took as a reason to erase the whole section and seemingly not to read the rest of my comment? Deleting a section on censorship is always a little bit ironic...  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*BTW: whether the article is protected or not is not of any interest for the discussion of censorship! A library does not only censor the books it throws from it shelves, but the books it doesn't allow into it shelves in the first place!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I put the whole section up [[User:RonLar|here]], so you can read it carefully again. Take your time, but nevertheless, react timely - you said that  would be important....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 12:05, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:At this point, I think it's become abundantly clear that complaining about censorship will get you nowhere.  I realize users will come up and be frustrated by certain site traditions, but that's just the way Conservapedia is run, RonLar.--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 13:41, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sorry, I thought you were saying the article was protected. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, I'm astonished to think that you consider adding alternative viewpoints to be something that has to be '''cleared''' with a sysop first. My understanding of project policy is that all contributors are free to describe non-conservative, non-Christian views ... especially on an article describing a controversy between the two sides. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:38, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Apology accepted. Perhaps you could revert your reaction to this misunderstanding by reintroducing the section which you erased from your talk-page?&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please read [[User:RonLar#Again, the previous example of ideological censorship, in detail]] - all of it, not only the first sentence. This should answer some of your questions.&lt;br /&gt;
:::*Please address the incident which I mentioned there.&lt;br /&gt;
:::[[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 16:56, 16 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Eh? I thought you wanted help. Please answer my question: Has someone told you you can't describe the liberal or secular viewpoint on some topic? (Or did you try to sneak in such a viewpoint without proper attribution)? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:39, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::How is it a sensible use of my time to answer new questions  when you seem to ignore my answers to your old ones? Please remember your statements:&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''Unless you can show at least one diff, where a senior editor censored something ... merely because it disagreed with some conservative shibboleth ... than you ought to stop saying this. I address this not so much to you, as to those who follow you or travel alongside you.'' }}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::and&lt;br /&gt;
:::::{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:::::''I asked for an instance of ideological censorship.''}}&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Well, you find it here: [[User:RonLar#Again.2C_the_previous_example_of_ideological_censorship.2C_in_detail]] Of course I am willing to answer any question concerning this specific example of censorship, especially those which indicate that you read the whole comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks, [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 02:41, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nearly two weeks later: Did you take a look? Or even better, did you read the whole thing? [[User:RonLar|RonLar]] 18:17, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-Clancy cracks? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In general I'm a Clancy fan but I think some of the criticism you removed was valid. For example by the time he wrote &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; his standards of research had perceptibly dropped (The AH-64 has a 20mm gun? Really?) and &amp;quot;Red Rabbit&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;The Teeth of the Tiger&amp;quot; were frankly rubbish. Maybe some of the criticisms should stay? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:09, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Anything can stay if properly sourced: X said Y about Z. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:10, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::What would be an acceptable source? I have all Clancy's books; would they be acceptable sources for pointing out declining standards of technical accuracy? --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:20, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::LOL, '''your''' interpretation of Clancy's writings would be (what is called at Wikipedia) original research. If you don't know what I meant by 'properly sourced', then you're unqualified to contribute anything further to this project. If you do know, you're just toying with me. Godspeed. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:23, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear enough. What I'd do is reference both Clancy's books and technical sources that contradict them, such as the fact that the AH-64 does NOT have a 20mm gun. Like I said I'm generally a Clancy fan - &amp;quot;Without Remorse&amp;quot; may just be the best thriller ever written - but his last few books have been a bit disappointing and his research has definitely slipped. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:28, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::What I would propose is to remove the comments about &amp;quot;The sum of all fears&amp;quot; - a nuclear weapon could be built with a table saw and a small lathe, never mind optical milling equipment - but keep and expand on the comment about the declining level of technical accuracy. The divergence of the Ryanverse from reality isn't important because it IS fiction, but the declining level of research and tendency towards unrealistic assessments of real-world capabilities IS important. For example &amp;quot;The Bear and the Dragon&amp;quot; is utterly unrealistic even in the Ryanverse. If China invaded Russia they'd get about ten feet over the border before being annihilated. The fortifitions on the Sino-Russian border make the Maginot line look like a sand castle on the beach, and they were actually designed by strategic thinkers. --[[User:SamCoulter|SamCoulter]] 23:44, 17 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On second thought, maybe I'm being too hard on you. I recently started tutoring schoolchildren, and I'm learning to be more patient with their quaint notions. After all, making wrong guesses and getting them corrected is often the best way to learn. Shall I not condescend to grant you the same grace? ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've read all Tom Clancy's [[Jack Ryan]] and [[John Clark]] novels. I always assumed that any discrepancies were inserted on purpose; Clancy certainly would have no reason to put correct information on how to make a suitcase-sized nuclear bomb in his books: what conservative would want to inspire a copycat crime? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you want to include &amp;quot;criticism&amp;quot; by some published author who says an attack helicopter does or does not have a certain sized gun, go ahead. He's also not very accurate about the software used in the stock market, although it was a key plot element in ''[[Debt of Honor]]''. (Come to think of it, if a man knew everything and wanted to make money betting on horse races, he would know not to put all his winnings on the next race (&amp;quot;[[John Doe]]&amp;quot; TV series pilot). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:56, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Language ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Big_Bang_theory Language like this] makes me extremely uncomfortable: &amp;quot;when grownups talk&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;woman's logic is strange, don't you think&amp;quot;, etc. (especially this in his earlier statements: &amp;quot;and being educated briefly by my grandpa in matters &amp;quot;of faith&amp;quot;, mostly about &amp;quot;Catholic errors&amp;quot;, and the absolute need to be trufhful, my concern was that the Catholics are wrong on one more point since the Big Bang was proven wrong in 1985&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First, I am not a woman. My identity is very well known and I am quite easy to find. Ottava means eight, and Ottava Rima means Eight Rhyme, a type of rhyming pattern used in Italian epic poetry. Second, his language is condescending, misogynistic, religiously bigoted, etc. Third, his claims about the Big Bang Theory are rather strange, conspiratorial, and nothing I have ever heard by any legitimate scientist. I cannot honestly believe that he is a real conservative but I believe he is a plant just like many of the people who vandalize. His job is to produce some of the most absurd stuff to try and make conservatives look awful. If I am wrong, I am wrong, but his language does not seem like something that is appropriate. I talked to Geoff Plourde about this quite a bit tonight because it bothered me a lot. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:44, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Um ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism and obesity]] - is this a joke? It seems to be just a list of fat atheists. It even has random tidbits like &amp;quot;Chuck Norris endorses the Total Gym exercise system.[59]&amp;quot; I know many priests who are overweight, and many religious people who are. I know many atheists who are ultra thing and anorexic. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Christian and Library of Congress researcher's explanations of reports of UFOs &amp;quot; How would that even deal with atheism and obesity? Yet it is in there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The page looks like it was created to make Conservapedia and conservatism look really bad. Sigh. [[User:Ottava|Ottava]] ([[user talk:Ottava|talk]]) 22:58, 18 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:User:Conservative is good at attracting readership to this website. The [[Atheism and obesity]] seems to me a bit of payback for the liberals who call Rush Limbaugh a big, fat idiot. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:57, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::And in his payback, he demeans everyone who is overweight, including myself. I've dealt with mean-spirited behavior from people about weight the majority of my life - there is no acceptable reason for being hostile about the issue. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 16:53, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== You were looking for ideological censorship? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bestiality&amp;amp;curid=88619&amp;amp;diff=920267&amp;amp;oldid=920266 easy to find] --[[User:DrDean|DrDean]] 23:52, 23 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Not as easy as you say. See [[Talk:Bestiality]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:44, 24 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Senior Admin assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, I would like to bring something to your attention as a senior administrator. I have been in private communication with User:SamCoulter over the last few weeks. There is nothing in his attitude and comments to me in private and his behaviour here on Conservapedia to suggest this user is anything but sincere. He was recently blocked for the edit [http://conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/SamCoulter here] (the last edit he made - I will not link directly to it because the topics are extremely offensive and not family friendly). For this effort he was blocked for three months. His edit was a) relevant b) correct according to the article linked and c) was a link which was on the front page already. It seems that some users wanted to quote the article without implying the articles conclusions as they were at loggerheads with a users personal opinion. I don't think the user should have been blocked but now he is I won't remove it but I do believe that 3 months is extremely heavy-handed. I don't want to create controversy so I will not chnage the block myself but I am bringing this up with you and User:Karajou also (I am unable to contact the blocking sysop). Thank you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:11, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Keep him blocked. He vandalized twice. In fact, I am going to increase the time blocked. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:02, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Do you have evidence of this vandalism? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:04, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::If you want to defend those recent contributions be my guest. If you want to wrangle with me about them, it is not going to happen. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::I tell you now '''there was no vandalism''' you are blocking a user for adding sourced and factual material. You are blocking him for no reason! [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 21:09, 25 September 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry, but it's actually very easy to avoid a block. I suggest you start coaching new users about courtesy, project goals, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I myself disagree with the project goals of RW, but they haven't given me any long blocks. Why? Because I follow their rules in their house.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adolescents often have trouble figuring out what the rules are, or trouble realizing the benefits of following them. (In the long run, civil disobedience campaigns against beneficial institutions such as Democracy and Free Markets simply backfire.) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:52, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I respectfully disagree with you. It's incredibly ''easy'' to get blocked on this site, because honestly, it appears to depend on the whim of the blocking editor (doesn't like what's being said because it's contrary to the blocking editor's opinion, got up on the wrong side of the bed, had a fight with someone in real life and are taking it out on editors here at CP.) You yourself just handed out an ''infinite'' block for ''defending'' someone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Many editors, myself included, have protested User:Conservative's articles and his method of defending them. If anyone objects, he automatically deems them an atheist/evolutionist, etc., which at least in my case, is far from the truth. I object to several things. First, his use of &amp;quot;obese&amp;quot; as a ''ad hominem'' attack against people whose ideas he disagrees with. I've dealt with bullying behavior about weight most of my life, and have tried to point out to him how hurtful his taunts are, but he thinks it's amusing, and the other sysops here (yourself included) appear to agree. I'm all for a good discussion about ''ideas'', but when the attacks become personal, and all-inclusive, then yes, I'm going to protest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Second, most of the articles are just ''badly, badly written''. They meander ''miles'' away from the original topic, they tend to be a bunch of quotes lumped together, and in many of them, the point that he's trying to make is missed completely. The actual subjects might be valid, and important enough to warrent an article on them, but creating 10 articles that say the same thing, and that can (and should) be consolidated into one, '''''well-researched and well-written document''''', is just poor scholarship. --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 12:53, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Well, thank you for not giving me an excuse to block you! ;-) Very well written . . .&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::As I've said elsewhere, [http://ameriwiki.wikkii.com/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&amp;amp;diff=4073&amp;amp;oldid=4071] I disagree with the stance of &amp;quot;the admin&amp;quot; who is making ''[[ad hominem]]'' attacks on atheists; I think it's a misguided attempt to attract readership.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::If anyone's had a '''good''' edit reverted for a bad reason, they can just let me know. Just remember: if anyone is criticizing to condemn, I'm not interested, but if they want me to change things, I'm the man who can do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:03, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BrentH's block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see you blocked BrentH for trolling and reverted 2 of his edits. He linked [[Professor]] to an existing article here on CP, [[Professor values]]. Why was that trolling? --[[User:SharonW|SharonW]] 19:55, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps prior edits?--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 20:01, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::User: Ed Poor did not appreciate the section right above this one--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 21:14, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::BrentH made a perfectly reasonable and respectful suggestion. It would appear from the edit history that he was referring to an article about Winona Ryder, created by Ed Poor, which contained one piece of trivia but no basic information regarding the person whatsoever. What BrentH said is simply common sense, and I too cannot see how this can justify a block. [[User:DavidZa|DavidZa]] 22:45, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Indeed, certain longstanding members of this community seem to have rather thin skin.  I did not see BrentH's post as offensive or out of line--[[User:CamilleT|CamilleT]] 22:54, 1 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== This is an encyclopedia. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You wrote that on my talkpage. ''This is an encyclopedia.''. Well, if it is articles like [[bestiality and Britain]] ahould be deleted because, as I have pointed out numerous times, it has nothing to do with bestiality and Britain. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:27, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Article deleted. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=delete&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1]&lt;br /&gt;
::Hey thanks Ed. Just for the record though I wasn't &amp;quot;bothered&amp;quot; by the content so much as bothered by the ''lack'' of content. As the commandments say - everything must be true and verifiable which that article clearly wasn't. Many thanks. I must admit - I have a lot of respect for you and karajou. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Ed, evolution was birthed in Britain and secularism has grown rampant in their country. Now their society is a mess and there is rioting in the streets. In addition, the'' Guardian'' just published a puff piece on bestiality. I say enough is enough and it's time their moral rot is exposed. I realize that pointing out that folly and consequences of atheism/evolutionism annoys liberals, but so what. Not only are they grossly and obviously in error, but atheists/evolutionists have shown themselves [[Atheism and cowardice|to be timid little bunnies]]. I restored the article because I feel confident that Conservapedia can stand up to foolish and timid little bunnies. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:21, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::Enough with the insults conservative. I am neither a liberal nor an atheist and am sick to death of you accusing me of such. The article has nothing, I repeat '''nothing''' about the practice in Britain. I say again '''nothing'''. You poor scholarship is on show and we can ''all'' see it. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:02, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::Ed, a Brit was trying to bring over his deviant farming practices to the United States as can be seen [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7600523/British-man-51-arrested-at-bestiality-farm.html HERE]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 20:28, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::You misread the article, Conservative. The Oregon farm is owned by an American. The British man was visiting it. Read [http://www.examiner.com/headlines-in-seattle/seattle-convicted-cocaine-smuggler-arrested-likely-into-bestiality-liking-sex-with-animals here] for a version of the story that makes who owned the farm clearer. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keldaby goats.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|An exclusive British art gallery was criticised for displaying a highly offensive bestiality oriented painting which featured a [[goat]] just yards from The Ritz hotel and where it could be seen by children.- The Daily Mail online (MailOnline), August 5, 2011 ''The explicit art that shows bestiality with a goat just yards from The Ritz'']]&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::There is no way I'd let children any where this site with Conservatives despicable articles all over the place. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 20:54, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::::::::::Max, I heard Oregon was pretty liberal. It figures the farm was in Oregon. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:30, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::::::::::I heard that most states are pretty liberal... But that doesn't make the rumors true. [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 22:34, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
Oregon voted for Obama plus fairly recently they had the most atheists per capita in the United States. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:57, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Omaha, Nebraska also voted for obama but calling it liberal is very silly--[[User:SeanS|SeanS]] 22:58, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/02/25/new-poll-identifies-most-liberal-and-conservative-states/ Oregon is liberal] [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:07, 2 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm slightly confused as to why it's relevant or not that Oregon is liberal. After all the state DOES have a law against bestiality, so that argues against liberals being tolerant of it. --[[User:ColSharp|ColSharp]] 08:33, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Since when do liberals obey the laws on the books in the first place? This photo [http://www.conservapedia.com/File:1915b7ec753fa9d0352885dc23da4469.jpg] is proof that liberals have no intention of obeying laws regarding littering.  They trashed Washington D.C. ''when they got their way'', January 20, 2009.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 09:10, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::There's a law in New Jersey about recycling, yet I know several conservatives who refuse to recycle. Why is this? [[User:JonG|~ ]][[User_talk:JonG|JonG]][[Special:Contributions/JonG| ~]] 13:26, 3 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Request for Admin assistance  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To all senior admins and sysops. I am being repeatedly abused by user:conservative who, among other things, accuses me continuously of being an atheist simply because I point out some of the holes in his articles. See [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;curid=113357&amp;amp;diff=924642&amp;amp;oldid=924636 here for the latest accusation]. I have asked him numerous times to desist with his sneering name calling as I find it offensive to have my faith questioned and nothing is ever done. He state’s I am atheist because I don’t agree with some of his ridiculous contentions. In actual fact it isn’t even that I disagree with him it is that I point out his shoddy research, poor scholarship and his berating, insulting and sarcastic behaviour towards others. I am of the opinion now that he is purposely calling me names because he knows I don’t like it which is unchristian, impolite and, above all, insulting. Is anyone going to teach this man some manners? Has Conservapedia become a place where Conservative is allowed to behave this way without any warning or comeuppance but all other editors and warned and blocked for minor infractions.  He is in continual violation of the commandments yet NOTHING is done whereas people like myself are always watching out to avoid being banned. Well, fine, ban me if you like. I probably will be after this posting and no doubt Conservative will cackle with glee at “winning” again. But laugh Conservative, you win nothing. I post this is full knowledge that I might be blocked banned and insulted by you in my absence and I have always remained polite and civil plus I can hold my head up high. Hopefully one of you will take a stand and insist on standards of civility. But I don’t hold out much hope. Thanks, many of you were kind, decent people whom I enjoyed working with and I pray for you. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 19:21, 5 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I am disappointed in you most of all Ed. Coming from wikipedia and being the first to jump on others for incivility you ignore when it comes to the ruling chaste of Conservapedia. You should be ashamed. [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 17:48, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Max, I think you assume entirely too much about my dispositions.  You really don't know what extent I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; or if I &amp;quot;cackle&amp;quot; at all. You also don't know what value I place on &amp;quot;winning&amp;quot;. In fact, you don't even know if I am one person or a team.  I/we remain inscrutable. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:24, 12 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::::User:Conservative, this is getting silly. You wrote for instance:&lt;br /&gt;
::::::''Actually KhalidM, I have a very outgoing personality and a university professor friend of mine told me that I would make a great administrator because I can be very diplomatic. While I realize that I will never cultivate a large atheist or liberal fan club, I can live with that. Conservative 20:34, 5 October 2011 (EDT) ''&lt;br /&gt;
::::So, while your grammatical gender may be undetermined, your number isn't. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:44, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== King George I ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The article of [[King George I]] was deleted as a ''creation of vandals''. On the talk page I read the comment of User:RJJense: ''I added much new text, all of which I wrote, and previously posted on Citizendium.'' I looked up the article at Citizendium and it seemed to be quite informative - certainly not vandalistic! Could it be restored? I'd like to insert a valid link into [[elector]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 15:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I restored the last version by RJJense. I feel confident that his last version was a good article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:34, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Thanks - it really seems so! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:57, 13 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;quot;New Ordeal&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I noticed that you placed the quotation marks around the term &amp;quot;New Ordeal.&amp;quot; As you have probably noticed I have been attempting to fix that article. Quite frankly, the article is pretty bad to start with and several of the references that prior authors cited have nothing to do with the topic. Do you know if there is procedure in which this article may be recommended for deletion? --[[User:Padams|Padams]] 15:33, 15 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Better to mark it as an essay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:31, 19 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Block of AugustO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I looked at [[Conservapedia:Editor's_guide#If_you_get_blocked]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you get blocked, it's probably because you (1) broke the rules and (2) ignored hints, requests and/or warnings. So the first thing you should do is review your communications with others here, particularly those who are admins. Have you been trying to get along by following our practices and supporting our goals, or have you been trying to change our ways? If you are new here, it's best to go along to get along. After you have contributed a lot, we'll be more likely to listen to your suggestions, but breaking the rules will just end up with eliminating you from the project. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I can't think of any rule which I broke&lt;br /&gt;
::*I was requested to ''to do some charitable work somewhere instead''. I'm already engaged in such work, so this doesn't apply...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't try to ''change our ways''. I try to correct factual errors (e.g.,  ιδού can be translated as ''at this moment'' or that it is right to call ''Carolus Martellus'' the grandson of ''Carolus Magnus''.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Perhaps upon reflection you may realize that you'd rather be part of the project than insist on your own way. You might want to apologize and get unblocked. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*I don't insist on my own way and I apologize if anyone feels insulted by my criticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you want to discuss your block, '''do not create a new account'''. Rather, use one of the following methods to appeal the decision (listed in order of preference). ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*Here, I obviously failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. ''Contact the person who blocked you (see below).&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
2. ''If you get no reply after a reasonable amount of time, you may contact any Administrator.&lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
3. ''Email cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com giving the name of the Administrator or editor who blocked you, and the date, and it will be forwarded on to them. &lt;br /&gt;
::*tried&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''If you contact more than one person about this, please do them the courtesy of letting them know who else you have tried contacting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
::*This should be obvious from the header of my emails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Contacting an Administrator or editor can usually be done by one of the following methods: ''&lt;br /&gt;
*''Use the &amp;quot;Email this user&amp;quot; link in the toolbox. This, however, will only work if both you and the Administrator or editor have enabled this on your/their respective accounts.&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Administrator or editor may have provided an email address or other contact information (e.g. AIM) on their user page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::*This section seems to be obsolete: ''email this user'' doesn't work for any of the administrators I tried to reach. And I couldn't get Ed Poor's email address via his user page. So we are in a [[Catch 22]] kind of situation...&lt;br /&gt;
::*I emailed to &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;aschlafy@aol.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;conservapedia@zoho.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;code&amp;gt;cpwebmaster@conservapedia.com&amp;lt;/code&amp;gt;. I didn't get any reply (is 1-2 days a ''reasonable amount of time'' to wait? I thinks so...) to my short email which stated: ''I understand that my criticisms of CBP and the World History Lectures are quite unwelcome, but they are hardly trolling! I'd appreciate if you lift my block.''&lt;br /&gt;
::*So I decided to create a new account to appeal the block, hoping that the advice against this action is as obsolete as other sections of the ''editor's guide''.&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 07:56, 26 October 2011 (EDT) (AugustO)&lt;br /&gt;
:::August, I think you should start a career in sales. You certainly have the persistence to be a good salesman. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 09:47, 26 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed Poor, the block of AugustO is now more than a week old. I tried to reach you via various channels - could you please lift the block as the stated reason (&amp;quot;trolling&amp;quot;) doesn't apply? [[User:ErnestO|ErnestO]] 11:09, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Please get a [[writing plan]] from him and get it to me, and I'll consider it. Meanwhile, any sysop is free to unblock him. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:01, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Is that any official Sysop, or anyone with Block rights? I'd be happy to unblock Mr O so that he can post his writing plan.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:25, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::On second thoughts, perhaps I'll just go ahead. Please reverse my action if I'm overstepping the mark.--[[User:CPalmer|CPalmer]] 10:33, 1 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Thanks for the unblock!&lt;br /&gt;
*I read the article on the [[writing plan]], and I'll try to provide you with one. This would be easier if a ''sample plan'' were provided. But nonetheless, here it is:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mainly I'm interested in the CBP. Mind you, I'm not ''Junker Jörg'', I'm not capable to create a translation on my own which stands for hundreds of years. But I think that translating the Bible in a group, and extensively discussing your work is a marvelous way to get a greater insight into the ''Book of books''.  While doing so, I try to dig into what Conservative calls the ''ANE culture'', as you can see [[Talk:John_1-7_(Translated)#Issue_with_translation_of_John_4:53|here]], where I try to shed light on timekeeping during the Roman empire.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When I came here, I thought that there would be a group of likewise interested individuals, but at the moment there seems to be only one other editor with similar interests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As my approach to the CBP generates quite a few edits on talk-pages, I balance these with edits to articles. These tend to by connected somehow with my namesakes (August of Saxony, Ernest August of Hanover), the history - or just happen on pages where I read something which puzzled me :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:21, 8 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Abortion issue ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It would be a great idea to merge the articles. In fact, if you were interested in expanding the article, I might be interested in helping.--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:28, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yes, please help me organize this. We should give prominence to conservative views, but let's steer away from censoring liberal views. It would be nice if liberals could see '''why''' conservatives believe differently. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:43, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::OK!--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 14:48, 29 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I merged the articles and added a bit on abortion and political ideology. How is it?--[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:53, 31 October 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks for the change but==&lt;br /&gt;
perhaps it should be bed bugs (plural), and now when i make an edit and it goes thru, if i try to make another one i get &amp;quot;Someone else has changed this page since you started editing it&amp;quot; but no one has. Going back to page and trying anew results in the same. 3.1: longetivity should be longevity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus is Lord, thanks[[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 07:58, 5 November 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback here ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Blocking policy improvement panel member - please give your feedback [http://conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Panel_members.2C_please_give_your_feedback_below HERE]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your assistance would be much appreciated. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:05, 16 November 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I have explained my ideas in private email to you and Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:50, 11 December 2011 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  a few messages to you ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are a few messages to you here: http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Air_superiority [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:14, 26 May 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for picking up some of my &amp;quot;wiki litter&amp;quot; that I left behind (redirects to non-existent pages). I will try to be more diligent as far as not littering in the future. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:22, 11 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You're welcome. And don't bother yourself: it's better for you to focus your time on building the wiki, while less talented contributors like myself do the routine housekeeping. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If I had your writing skill, I'd be making whole article like you do. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:34, 12 June 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== A message to you from Cipe ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fixing a MediaWiki message: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Could you perform the edit I described [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;oldid=992864#Edit_request here, on very bottom of the page]? I asked Aschlafly but he's probably busy now.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Best [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 15:33, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I know the basics of Wiki coding and not the advanced level coding. I would ask someone else. Try Ed Poor. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:32, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Unfortunately, I cannot edit Ed's talk page. Could you suggest someone different? Or message him?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::The change is rather small and requires only copy-and-paste. More directly: you can copy contents of this: [[User:Cipe/MW_fix]] to: [[MediaWiki:Revision-info]]. Even if my suggestion is wrong, it can be reverted, so there is no danger. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 16:41, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Okay, I did it. But where can I see the results? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:53, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you very much. You'll see it when checking older revision. Here is an example: [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I noticed that MediaWiki has a different message when you're checking current revision. I'll prepare fix in a moment. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 17:55, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The message seems to have logged me out. I think it needs fixing. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:56, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I also got logged out, but only once. I can consistently see the new message now. Perhaps the software logs out when a edit to MediaWiki is made. Could you please copy [[User:Cipe/MW fix 2]] to [[MediaWiki:Revision-info-current]]? I promise it's the last change :) It is shown for a permalink to current revision. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:08, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I don't think that's it. I think you need to put the '''www.''' in front of '''www.conservapedia.com''' --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 18:09, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::It seems to work. I can see the messages: [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=991546 for past revisions] and [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;amp;oldid=992065 for current revision]. Thanks for changing. [[User:Cipe|Cipe]] 18:19, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you for unlocking your talk page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really appreciate being able to get in contact with you directly when the circumstances arise.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 18:39, 13 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thank you ==&lt;br /&gt;
Now he can try to justify what he said about the article. [[User:Davidspencer|Davidspencer]] 14:29, 14 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== File:GoreFireBreathing.jpg ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do you think it would be appropriate to use this image in the [[Current TV]] article? It's already in Gore's main article, so why not include it in the article about his obscure TV network on channel 9800 on my TV? --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 20:35, 15 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== apology. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hey, I just wanted to apologise for the comments I made related to you, they were impolite and unnecessary.  I don't have anything against you or anything, I just posted something that I thought was relevent without thinking how it would be taken by anyone other than myself, as it happened they were rude and quite personal.  I acknowledge that I behaved quite badly, and in future I will try to avoid giving you, or others, offense.  So..... virtual handshake?[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 06:18, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, don't be so dramatic. Just comment on the articles and issues of the day, and forget about personalities. That's how this project's supposed to run. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:33, 18 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::lol. Nah it's difficult to tell over the internet how people are reacting, so for all I knew you could have been quite insulted or something, and I had to make sure that I was being very clear. Anyway, cool[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 01:03, 19 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I'm not sure you get it: We don't want personal remarks on this wiki, clear or not. You need to be clear only about one thing: what you intend to write about an article topic. You must not comment on other users in any way. Is '''that''' clear? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 20 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== On Personal Attacks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As someone who has been the subject of personal comments (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987753&amp;amp;oldid=987715], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987827&amp;amp;oldid=987777], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&amp;amp;diff=987956&amp;amp;oldid=987955], [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Aschlafly&amp;amp;diff=990739&amp;amp;oldid=990566]), I would like to share my opinion on Conservapedia's policy on personal attacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think it is very appropriate to make '''relevant''' comments on editing and other wiki behavior to determine what the best practices are with regards to editing and other actions and, if necessary, to instruct users who may not know better about such practices.  For example, I have informed two administrators about redacting the automatically-generated deletion log entry to remove sensitive material.  I have also asked one administrator to include source information in that user's uploaded images, requests with which this user has complied.  Likewise, if someone has a habit of posting comments on talk pages without signing them, it is appropriate to inform them of how to sign posts.  Further, if someone is about to violate 90/10, a warning is definitely appropriate.  None of these have to do with the real-life '''personality''' that these editors, many of whom are brothers and sisters in Christ, have; these comments focus on on-wiki '''behavior'''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, I think that if someone is going to make a statement regarding real-life facts or Conservapedia's commandments, policies, and best practices, it is appropriate to debate this statement '''without going into personality details'''.  Such debate may very well include Socratic or rhetorical questioning as a argumentative device.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, Mr. Schlafly is the owner of the site, so he has the final say in this, but I'm sure he would agree with what I have written.  Although attacks on another editor's real-life personality should generally be removed, I do not see the need to remove good-faith debate and discussion over user '''behavior''' at Conservapedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for reading this.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 12:36, 21 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Yeah, thanks, Greg. If I err on the side of &amp;quot;absolutely nothing about the person&amp;quot; to an absurd point, please continue to help me out. I'm mainly opposed to comments like, &amp;quot;You're a jerk&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;I don't have to follow the rules.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Nothing wrong with '''friendly''' personal comments, like, &amp;quot;Thanks for pointing out that a rigid, absolutist enforcement of the rules may not be wise.&amp;quot; --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:01, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hey Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I saw your Arbcom case over at Wikipedia just today looking through for cases of bias there. :) Wikipedia's - nuts, huh? Lol. I ran into the Obama bias team over there in Scjessey, Wikidemon, and company, back in late 2009. It's become so hopelessly biased by now you've just got to laugh. They know they're keeping all controversy out of the Obama page and how biased they are, and don't care. Well, all my facts are at Conservapedia's services now. :) Anyway, just saying it's nice to see another ex-Wikipedian here I guess - hope we get some more! :) --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Jzyehoshua]] 01:15, 22 July 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tehpwn3r==&lt;br /&gt;
'User names based on your real name or initials are '''preferred'''' does not state that you will be blocked. [[User:Conservative|Also]].--[[User:Wishnaka|Wishnaka]] 19:51, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Inappropriate user name. It has been a general principle that one's user name be &amp;quot;based on one's real first name and last initial&amp;quot;, though there are a number of reasons why that is not always practical. The point is that we don't like the kind of foolish &amp;quot;handles&amp;quot; that are often used in various blogs and social web sites. If you run afoul of this by accident, you will be asked to create a new account, and doing so will not be considered sockpuppetry. Of course, some user names are essentially just vandalism, and are treated that way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Randall7 ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you don't object, I suggest shortening his block to maybe 3 days. His remark, while rude and impertinent, did have some substance, and a hard block doesn't serve to do anything but cause more unhappiness. Thanks for considering,&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 20:48, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you unblock him, you're responsible. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:54, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I recommend keeping the week. And don't &amp;gt; dont. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 21:01, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks for pointing out the typo.[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 23:35, 25 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Michael Baumgartner==&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Mr. Poor,&lt;br /&gt;
Please do a careful side-by-side comparison of [[Michael Baumgartner]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michael_Baumgartner&amp;amp;oldid=509330054 the Wikipedia article]. I did a google search on &amp;quot;Michael Baumgartner&amp;quot; and came up with a number of sources including the Wikipedia article.  I took notes from all of the sources, and wrote a new article based on my notes.  I honestly believe that the article uses a different set of sources, covers ideas in a different order, and covers the topic differently than Wikipedia.  Please take another look, and if you agree, please restore [[Michael Baumgartner]]. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:05, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*I understand the workload you face. Could you please look at the article and reconsider? [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 14:51, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*:Already restored in good faith; I trust you, and I'm not going to compare it closely. I'll leave that to others. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:54, 27 August 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== My condolences ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the death of the Rev Dr Moon. [[User:JuanMotame|JuanMotame]] 18:54, 2 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==Thanks==&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the welcome. I wonder if you could help me. I tried [[Special:MovePage/William. J. Fulbright]] but apparently I don't have permission. The page should be at [[J. William Fulbright]], the name of the founder of the Fulbright scholarship program.&lt;br /&gt;
:Done.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 17:26, 4 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sun Myung Moon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You changed the first sentence of the protected article on [[Sun Myung Moon]] from the present to the past tense. Could you take care of the rest of the article, too? Thanks. [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 05:35, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
*Feel free to take care of that yourself. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 13:01, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I took care of it. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 13:21, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:32, 5 September 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Requesting Assistance ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Poor,  I'm relatively new here and don't completely know my way around.  Would you please look at my comment concerning [[Talk:American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel|American Atheists and their challenges in terms of overweight leadership personnel]].  If my view is in line with the site, I'm quite certain that a template or procedure is needed at this point.  If my views are not in line with the site, please feel free to remove that comment as you see fit.  You seem experienced here, so your guidance is requested.  --[[User:Nouniquenames|Nouniquenames]] 00:03, 21 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Psychological manipulation]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've noticed that you moved/redirected the above article to [[Essay: Psychological manipulation in the Bible]] on grounds &amp;quot;not a general article; case study uses a Bible story&amp;quot;. I've got somewhat confused about this step, because IMHO the article is general and only the case study section itself contains a &amp;quot;Bible story&amp;quot;. In fact the rest is a combination of various sources, some of them far from having anything to do w/ Bible at all. I was by far not completely done with that article and now I actually do not know how to continue working on it. It says now &amp;quot;This Is An Original Work. Contributors should add their signatures to the end section. If published, a notice will be posted and, if desired, contributors will be recognized.&amp;quot; but that was not my idea at all, I would be more than happy if anyone could help to extend that, in my opinion, general article. If I could suggest anything then I would like to suggest to move only the 'case study' section to the essay realms and keep the rest as general article with hyperlink to that essay in appropriate, perhaps 'See Also' section. I also deem as deficiency that article does not appear in the Psychology category now, I believe it belongs there.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:35, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Objections to evolution]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As for your rationale for redirect on 'Objections to evolution', namely &amp;quot;I thought we already had plenty of articles opposing the Theory of evolution&amp;quot;, I agree with you that &amp;quot;we have&amp;quot;, but still would dare to oppose the redirect on grounds that 'Objections to evolution' is an article that brainwashes people at WP and enjoys special defence by witch-hunters who heavily suppress any different points of view there thus I believe it is of significant importance to have available alternative view on the same topic under the very same title.--[[User:AK|AK]] 10:50, 31 October 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quote Templates ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was doing some ''random page'' editing and found that there was a whole load of quote templates you created a while ago that link to nowhere and nothing seems to link to them. It seems the template for linking these quotes never got off the ground. I'm proposing that these either be deleted or put into some sort of quote page as I don't think there much use at the moment (except for possibly taking up server space). Kind Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 02:00, 2 November 2012 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Unificationism]]==&lt;br /&gt;
I am not surprised to see you make changes to the Unificationism page in defense of  your church, but why did you remove the part in which Moon  told an interviewer,  &amp;quot;God is living in me and I am the incarnation of himself.&amp;quot; &amp;quot;The whole world is in my hand and I will conquer and subjugate the world.&amp;quot;   [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-19459920?print=true]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are you saying the BBC made that up?  [[User:Daniel1212|Daniel1212]] 08:23, 14 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You can put that back in. Sorry for the delayed answer; my day job keeps me pretty busy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Be advised, though, that Rev. Moon himself disputed the ''conquer and subjugate'' quote, telling Newsweek interviewers that he had been quoted out of context. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:35, 20 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Way to stop the spammers ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From Aschlafly's talk page &lt;br /&gt;
Yesterday after I prayed an idea came to me (most likely from god) to stop the spammers from registering the spam accounts. If we can move away from user captcha and instead use a question that requires some knowledge (for example what team does tim tebow sit on the bench for or which team did he turned around) as the spambots will be completely flummoxed by this. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:16, 19 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The questycaptcha is excellent for this purpose. It stops ocr bots, and most paid spammers. The code would be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
   require_once( &amp;quot;$IP/extensions/ConfirmEdit/ConfirmEdit.php&amp;quot; );&lt;br /&gt;
   $wgCaptchaClass = 'QuestyCaptcha';&lt;br /&gt;
   $arr = array (&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;A question?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;An answer!&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        &amp;quot;What is this wiki's name?&amp;quot; =&amp;gt; &amp;quot;Conservapedia&amp;quot;,&lt;br /&gt;
        'Who is Tim Tebow' =&amp;gt; 'An athlete',&lt;br /&gt;
   foreach ( $arr as $key =&amp;gt; $value ) {&lt;br /&gt;
        $wgCaptchaQuestions[] = array( 'question' =&amp;gt; $key, 'answer' =&amp;gt; $value );&lt;br /&gt;
   }&lt;br /&gt;
Which you would place in /rootfiledirectory/localsettings.php[[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:54, 19 November 2012 (EST)''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Given your considerable experience in operating and maintaining wiki's like Wikipedia and convservapedia, do you think you would be able to implement this ? Regards [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 05:12, 23 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A serious Biblical matter==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aschlafly wrote the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. This wouldn't have been to problematic, but now he puts his outlandish idea into an article in the main space ([[Epistle to the Hebrews]]). First he wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''the most plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it.'''&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Iduan]] toned this down somewhat, so that we read at the moment:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;The [[Epistle to the Hebrews]] is the nineteenth book of the [[New Testament]], and one of the greatest mysteries in all of intellectual history: the authorship of this brilliant work is unknown, and '''one plausible theory is that Jesus himself wrote or dictated it'''.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I couldn't find any Biblical scholar who shares this idea, I couldn't find any authorative figure who promotes this - and this isn't much of a surprise if you read the epistle for yourself!  The only &amp;quot;scholar&amp;quot; who has proposed this &amp;quot;theory&amp;quot; in the last 2000 years is Andrew Schlafly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tried to delete this sentence, and then I tried to make it clear that this idea is a personal insight by Andrew Schlafly. My edits were reverted:  any reader of this encyclopedia gets the impression that this theory is something commonly known or well discussed. That's utterly untrue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I tend to be quite strict on Biblical matters - I'm often accused of being nitpicky.  As one of the sysops of Conservapedia who was active in 2012 I ask you to weigh in on this problem: maybe it is just me and most of the of you and your fellow sysops think that it is acceptable to present an  insight of a single person '''in a Biblical matter''' (an insight shared by virtually no one)  as a plausible theory. But - as the title of this section indicates - for me this is a very serious matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:26, 25 November 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree. Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:37, 5 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;Anyway, the page is just an essay, and the entire page is therefore pure Schlafly. What's wrong with that? &amp;quot;'' As I tried to convey with the phrase &amp;quot;this wouldn't have been to problematic&amp;quot;, there is nothing wrong with the essay [[Mystery:Did Jesus Write the Epistle to the Hebrews?]]. But I think it ''is'' problematic that the ''insight'' of the essay spills over into a page in the main space, i.e., [[Epistle to the Hebrews]], and becomes a ''fact'' during this process.&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;If your purpose for marking it as Mr. Schlafly's idea is to discredit it, then you're barking up the wrong tree.&amp;quot;'' It's the other way round: stating the ''insight'' in an article in the main space without making it clear that the only source for this idea is Andrew Schlafly is lending it an improper credibility. If you read an unsourced, unmarked statement in an encyclopedia, the reader generally takes it as a kind of common knowledge, even more so if he is e.g., a high-school pupil.&lt;br /&gt;
:--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 02:28, 6 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservapedia is a mix of opinion and fact. Each is clearly marked. Talk pages are filled with unsourced claims, and we make very few efforts to police such talk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If there is currently an unsourced, unmarked statement in an article that needs attention, please point it out to me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you - if unsourced, unmarked statements are reintroduced into the article, I'll point them out to you! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:02, 12 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hello ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Im new here and need some help. I figured I would go to you since you seem very involved in the community. I recently tried to instate an article about R*tional Wiki and suddenly it was deleted. I thought since we had an article about Wikipedia that we could write about wikis. I also noticed that it had been deleted several times by the same people. Why? The words are spam filtered to. I feel that we need to write about the faults and propaganda of this completely biased website. Not to mention they completely badmouth you in the most rude ways. Please help...--[[User:Colesmithsayshi|Colesmithsayshi]] 14:18, 31 December 2012 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mass Wedding ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was wanting to know what is the significance of mass weddings in the unification church ? I see your church has recently conducted it's first mass wedding since the very untimely death of the great Sun Myung Moo. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:05, 17 February 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Not sure how to respond to messages. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not sure how to answer the message you sent me.  There does not seem to be a way to respond attached to the message you sent.  Do I just respond in this open forum?  Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Math ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Greetings, Ed.  We haven't communicated in quite a while.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reason I am writing is that I saw your recent [[Essay:Campaign_to_make_Conservapedia_unusable]].  I know that this has long been an issue, and that you and I have both put a lot of effort into making math/science articles accessible.  I have one comment about it:  ''Your audience for this essay is just yourself.''  All the people who made things inaccessible&amp;amp;mdash;Foxtrot, Lemonpeel, Jaques, etc, are long gone.  So, if you want the situation to improve, instead of writing an essay, you're just going to have to make the improvements yourself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Actually, I'm not sure what articles you have in mind for your criticism.  If it's all the topology stuff ([[Regular_space]], [[Sequentially_compact]], [[Hausdorff_space]], ...), you have my sympathy, and you will just have to delete them.  No one will improve them.  But I strongly advise you ''not'' to delete them.  They aren't doing any harm, and no one reads them (except me :-).  An encyclopedia is not judged by how esoteric its most esoteric articles are, but by how well its mainstream articles are written, and how well those mainstream articles cover the field.  I think the mainstream math articles at Conservapedia, like integers, rational numbers, real numbers, and complex numbers, are pretty good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Which brings me to my specific point.  It isn't true that no one edits math articles any more.  There was a small amount of activity on integers and natural numbers recently.  Perhaps this is what led you to write the essay.  I don't think there was anything over-the-top about the recent edits, and I think you sometimes over-react to things like this.  I believe that the recent edits in that area were well-intentioned, and trying to do a good job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Giving a really good definition of the integers or natural numbers, in the way that you and I would like, at the appropriate level but with real clarity, is ''impossible''.  Saying &amp;quot;evenly divisible by 1&amp;quot; doesn't work, because the reader who doesn't know what an integer is will have no conception of what division is or what &amp;quot;evenly divisible&amp;quot; means.  Saying &amp;quot;has no fractional part&amp;quot; doesn't work either.  I can see what the author intended--numbers are things like &amp;quot;3.7&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;.7&amp;quot; is the fractional part.  So, having no fractional part means it is something like just 3.  That's correct, but it relies on having an intuitive notion of real numbers, that is, things like 3 and 3.1 and 3.7 and 3.14159....  (Speaking of which, happy pi day!!!)  Now most people have an intuitive feel for numbers with fractions well before they have to think about a formal definition of natural numbers.  I know I did.  That is, I knew about &amp;quot;3&amp;quot; in the context of &amp;quot;3.7 without the .7&amp;quot;, or &amp;quot;the biggest markings on a ruler, rather than all the small ones.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So how do you write the article?  You do the best you can, giving an imprecise defintion in terms of &amp;quot;numbers that you count with&amp;quot;, or something like that.  (By the way, I really really liked your &amp;quot;mathisfun&amp;quot; web link explaining these things on an elementary level, and I used it (crediting you) in my article at Ameriwiki.)  So the right thing is probably to define &amp;quot;counting numbers&amp;quot;, as in the web link, and accepting that that's the best you can do.  Then address, very lightly, the issue of how that might be different from &amp;quot;natural numbers&amp;quot;, and whether zero is included, and so on.  It's not worth making a big deal about.  Just pick some definitions, and stick to them.  Mention that maybe not everyone agrees.  Don't worry about students getting a bad grade on an exam because of a nit-picking difference--people taking exams will presumably have attended a class and gotten the instructor's view on this, if the instructor thinks it's important.  The way you addressed the issue in the natural number article is just right.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yeah, the stuff about integers being &amp;quot;the only integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered and in which order is preserved by addition&amp;quot; is over the top.  Either take it out or move it to the very bottom.  Other than that, I think the natural number / integer articles are in pretty good shape.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One more thing:  Don't be put off by the fancy &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; symbol.  The people are not trying to show off.  The symbols are cool, and the students will think so.  When I was in junior high, I thought that the summation and integral symbols were really cool, long before I knew what they meant.  Let the students see them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I still say that the Peano axioms would be a good thing to have at Conservapedia.  Nowhere near as complicated as &amp;quot;integral domain whose positive elements are well ordered&amp;quot;, and really interesting for the target audience.  You may copy my Peano article from Ameriwiki if you wish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:34, 14 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I just wanted to add my thoughts as a math graduate student who has made several edits to our math articles.  As someone who plans on becoming a professor, I think it is fundamental that, as an educational resource, Conservapedia has accessible (to the extent possible) math material.  However, we are not limited in space like a print encyclopedia, so there is certainly room for us to have more in-depth coverage of math topics for more advanced scholars.  It's not my intention to make Conservapedia unusable as an educational resource; if you think that my edits are not helpful, please feel free to discuss them with me.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 20:20, 15 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You may have missed my point, which is that 99% of our readers are concerned with math that is below the college level. I want the majority of our editorial effort in math to focus on what these readers need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:30, 17 March 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed:  I take exception to your implication that I &amp;quot;missed your point&amp;quot; about the intended audience of CP, or how to write for it.  Be assured that I absolutely, totally, utterly, and completely understand these issues.  If you have any question about this, please see my articles on [[Limit (mathematics)]], [[Algebra]], [[Compass and straightedge]], and [[Cramer's rule]].  ''These are all topics that I studied in high school'', and I'm sure you did too.  In particular, I put an enormous amount of work into the limit article.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, this stuff is entirely in your hands now.  If you have any problems with the math articles, you have the administrative power to delete any articles that you think are inappropriate, like the [[Kolmogorov space]] article.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:57, 4 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, thanks, brother wolf, for exposing your neck so meekly. But I have no desire to be top dog, if you'll excuse me for mixing metaphors. I'm glad you understand and work hard, and I hope you will help me make high school math (and below) accessible to the average reader - not just those in the top 1% like you and me. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:47, 5 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I must confess that I don't understand your metaphors very much -- brother wolf? exposing my neck?  I'm pretty clueless about contemporary culture.  But I know what &amp;quot;top dog&amp;quot; means.  There's no doubt that you are a top dog, being an administrator.  Also, I'm flattered to be considered in the top 1%, but, remember, there have been a lot of really sharp people here.  So I'm not sure about being in the top 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case, good luck, and have fun.  And don't hesitate to delete stuff that you consider inappropriate.  Really.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll come by and look around and say hello from time to time.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:50, 11 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Carbon Dioxide ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have redone Brenden's edits in a number of different edits. I hope this helps you. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 07:01, 10 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:It did. See my subsequent edits. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:23, 12 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Understanding Islam ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed, thanks for this entry: [[Islam and tolerance]]. I followed the reference link to the news story &amp;quot;The Roots of Muslim rage&amp;quot;, and read the article. I thought it was really interesting, and as I am trying to better understand their beliefs and attitude towards us, (those of Christian faith and in Western Nations) I wanted you to know this was helpful to me, thanks. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:36, 15 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:I put the article up for deletion; please contest me on it's talk page. Thanks, [[User:Brenden|brenden]] 15:29, 5 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I remember posting this thank-you to Ed Poor almost 3 months ago for making the page, as he referenced a very interesting article in the footnotes that helped me to better understand the position of Muslims. I had been trying to gain a better understanding of their point of view, and I found it very helpful. I'm surprised to see it up for deletion, since I don't think &amp;quot;one quote&amp;quot; pages are undesirable, as they often lead me to think more about a subject matter. Sometimes a little quote can lead to learning more about a subject. Why not add a little more information rather than try to delete the page? [[User:Taj|Taj]] 14:32, 6 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of your newer articles need some categories. I don't really know much about subject matter so would probably be better if you do it. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:03, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Feel free to place any category at all, when I'm too rushed to do it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:18, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Normally I would, just not to familiar with some of subject matter. [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:22, 16 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Christian Chivalry==&lt;br /&gt;
I redirected your article on [[Christian chivalry]] to the already existing page [[Chivalry]] since they're the same concept and the other page was already much more in-depth. Hope that was alright. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:20, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Did you complete the merge before reducing the page to a redirect? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:16, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not an admin, I don't think I can do a full merge like that... I figured since it was just a sentence and the sentiment of that sentence was already covered in the other article that the redirect would be sufficient... sorry. [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 22:26, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you did your best in good faith, then no apology is needed. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'll take a look later on, and if I think that quote is relevant I'll tack it on to [[Chivalry]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:28, 19 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Talk:Gun control#New Infographic]]==&lt;br /&gt;
As you are one of the main contributors to the [[Gun control]] page, I'm writing here to ask you to follow the link I posted in the heading of this section and read the data I found. I think it could be very helpful to the article, but as I said there I'm far from an expert in interpreting that kind of data. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 11:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I'm interested in describing both sides in the [[Firearms debate]]. I don't think we have to overemphasize one side. Put in anything you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:59, 20 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==fnarrow's reply to your terms==&lt;br /&gt;
I'm just copy and pasting what he sent me, please don't shoot the messenger. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]], I agree to your terms unequivocally and will do everything I can on the future to not allow my emotions to get the better of me in the future. That said, I just want to take a second to point out that 2 of the 6 examples you gave of my behavior, (4 and 5 I believe, i do not have the other page open as I type this email) were not posted by me but were part of a comment posted by another user in response to my comments. The other 4 I do not deny and I agree that they were out of line. To that end, I would like to point out that if you or [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] look at the final interaction between myself and [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] in the &amp;quot;why complaints will go nowhere&amp;quot; section of that same page, you will see that we had settled our differences peacefully. It wasn't until after that that i was banned for earlier statements made in the heat of the moment and out of exasperation regarding the situation at the time they were made. I do not contest the justice of the 1 day block, but when it was immediately followed by the infinite block before I had a chance to respond, apologize or anything else, that was when I felt I had been treated unfairly and asked my friend to join the site as a conduit for contact. (thanks again John!) While I therefore still think the infinite block was unwarranted, i do apologize for my actions and will not allow it to happen again. Thanks for your time and i look forward to helping the site grow from this point forward. --fnarrow&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; btw, I'm not 100# sure what a &amp;quot;sock&amp;quot; is, assure you that to my understanding of the term I am not one. I have neither the time nor the inclination to edit your wiki and only made this account at my friend's request since he had no other contact anyone here. [[User:JSandler|JSandler]] 22:35, 28 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Karajou said I could unblock Fnarrow. I hope this turns out okay. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 09:29, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fnarrow ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Would you be able to restore Fnarrows user and talk page whilst your at it mate ? [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 09:30, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:(this is [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]], I'm using [[User:JSandler|John(jsandler)'s]] phone at the moment as my IP is still blocked even though my user page shows that I have been unblocked by [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]]... Can that be fixed?) I wanted to thank everyone for helping me understand what happened and helping me get reinstated. I look forward to working with you all more in the future. Also, as [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] already posted, is it possible to have my user page and talk page content restored? Most of it can be deleted now that issues have been settled, but I'd like to recover other parts. Thanks again, [[User:fnarrow|fnarrow]] 14:00, 29 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Ed, yes I can post again, I had assumed you had unblocked me... but I guess not based upon your comment on my talk page. Anyway, can you restore the content which was deleted from my user page and talk page? I don't know how to do that... Also, since you're a very knowledgeable Conservative and I consider myself to be a fairly knowledgeable Libertarian I'd be willing to work with you on the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page you created if you're still looking for someone to help with that project. Let me know. Thanks, [[User:Fnarrow|Fnarrow]] 00:12, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I unblocked your username. Someone else seems to have unblocked your IP address; I don't know how to do that.&lt;br /&gt;
I'll leave your user and talk pages as C left them - ask him if he wants them undeleted. I'm just unblocking you, in light of your promise to chill out and be more focused on articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please start the [[Conservatives and libertarians]] page, and I'll join in. Thanks! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:41, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I think we can do that although I am not good with wikis. From what i Understand, Libertarians are conservative when it comes to economics, gun ownership, small government, defence etc but are closer to liberals on other social issues. The way I understand it, libertarians believe the law should protect person and property, but go no further than that. I will do some research in the next few days, write a beta copy and forward to you for review/editing if thats ok&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Excellent, Patmac. I'll add that to the article. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:22, 30 April 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Homosexuality article and General protection idea/proposal  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[homosexuality]] article seems to be a bit broken. The table of contents is in the wrong position. Could you or another sysop please fix this ? Also I had an Idea re article protection. Would it be possible to protect some article so that only those users with '''edit''' and '''sysop''' rights edit them. This would allow those pages to be edited and improved by trusted and known users whilst stopping liberal trolls and thugs pushing their POV and vandalizing them. I think that something like this would help improve the quality and accuracy of the encyclopedia as it would allow for updates, improvements, tweaks and general formatting improvements to be made to our most popular articles [[User:Dvergne|Dvergne]] 10:45, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For questions about rights (which involve software tweaks), talk to Andy. I can always unprotect an article at least temporarily. But if you want a longterm solution, I'm the wrong man to ask. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:41, 4 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Odysseus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*You should highlight quotes by including them in apostrophes: see [[Help:How to Code]] for a simple introduction - and follow [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052312&amp;amp;oldid=1052300 this link] for an example.&lt;br /&gt;
*If you include a link to a source just by using simple square brackets (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/odysseus.htm]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;), it appears only as a number (like &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;) in the text, similar to footnotes. But unlike those, it isn't listed in the references. To get it listed there, you have to include your link into &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;...&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; - tags. (see [http://conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Odysseus&amp;amp;diff=1052314&amp;amp;oldid=1052313 this link] for an example)&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 04:31, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Perhaps either AugustO or Ed Poor can help me, but other than on recent wikis where the quotation mark and the italic notation can be easily confused, I have never seen italic font used as a stand-alone indication of a block quotation.  I have seen italic used for titles of books or for emphasis or for foreign language words, but not as a replacement for quotation marks.  Any sources for this alternative would be appreciated. Thanks, [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 10:56, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:A very good question! Conservapedia states in its [[Conservapedia:Formatting conventions]]:&lt;br /&gt;
::''Italic sections of text are usually used to portion off a portion of text, indicating it is integral to the sentence without being part of its continuation. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:But while wikipedia don't like when you put quotes in italics &lt;br /&gt;
::''For quotations, use only quotation marks (for short quotations) or block quoting (for long ones), not italics. (See Quotations below.) This means that (1) a quotation is not italicized inside quotation marks or a block quote just because it is a quotation, and (2) italics are no substitute for proper quotation formatting. ''&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservapedia doesn't address the matters (as far as I could see). Instead, Conservapedia offer some templates which try to do the job.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote}} or {{Q}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This template expects an author, so it can't be used in our special case:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Q|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Note how the text gets italicized, and is included in quotation marks: but this template is only used eleven times on this wiki. &lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quote box}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quote box|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Quotebox2}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{QuoteBox2|quote=the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.|source=John Taylor Gatto}}&lt;br /&gt;
:''QuoteBox2'' is used ten times on Conservapedia, ''Quotebox'' 422 times, ''Quote box'' only 1 time. Clearly they aren't very popular.&lt;br /&gt;
:*&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{Cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|the Greek hero who spent ten years fighting his way home, spurning wealth, fame, and the promise of immortality to reclaim his family.}}&lt;br /&gt;
:This is the most popular version, used over 1500 times. &lt;br /&gt;
:My conclusion: &lt;br /&gt;
:#The main feature of a quotation are - surprise, surprise - the quotation marks. Especially for short quotes, they shouldn't be omitted. I haven't used them regularly in the past (see the first quotations in this section), but I'll do so henceforth.&lt;br /&gt;
:#Conservapedia is mute on the use of italics to mark a quote. But perhaps we should follow wikipedia's lead and just don't do so&lt;br /&gt;
:#Indenting via ::: alone is not enough to mark a section as a long quote, at least &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt; .. &amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; should be used - this indents the quote from the left and the right margin. A longer quotation should use one of the templates - best probably &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{cquote}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
:Any thoughts? --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:50, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::My thought is that the last time we discussed a formatting issue, I tried to throw my weight around, and it didn't end on a cheerful note. So why don't I just follow whatever you recommend? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:24, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you.  I just want to say that I have never, ever thought of italics as conveying the limits of a quotation.  I always assumed that someone had put a printout of wiki-marked up text into an OCR scanner and it just got confused between double apostrophes and a quote mark.  I agree with your bottom line. Thanks [[User:Wschact|Wschact]] 21:40, 15 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Neutral third party's viewpoint sought ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed.  I'd like to get your views on the discussion between another user and me that took place on my talk page.  It looks as if you recently blocked him over another matter.  I think he just tried to bully me for no good reason, but I'd like to hear what a senior admin thinks.  Thanks for weighing in if you get the chance.  [[User:DanAP|DanAP]] 00:14, 18 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ed, I believe RontheDon and Bamorris9 are parodists--[[User:Patmac|Patmac]] 11:52, 20 May 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Propositional calculus ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I started that article.  It's a topic that you have, on several occasions (remember the &amp;quot;wff N proof&amp;quot; game?) expressed an interest in.  I urge you to fill it out.  Though I have a degree in mathematics, I do not know how to explain this topic at a high-school level, and I do not write about topics that I can't explain at a high-school level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also notice no activity on any &amp;quot;sciency&amp;quot; (STEM?) stuff over the last few months, from you or anyone else.  Have you lost interest?  I hope not.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 21:00, 1 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Susan Rice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please help me to expand the article [[Susan E. Rice]]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:29, 6 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I dont know how to put in a Officeholder-template. Can you please do it. Here are all informations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Rice --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:32, 11 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Edward Snowden ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should read [[Edward Snowden]]. That was my mistake. I might even have heard someone else mispronounce that.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:04, 12 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Lukashenko ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi can you please uploud this picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpeg ? Thanks--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 09:18, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:For the [[Belarus]] article? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:No for the [[Alexander Lukashenko]]-article please.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:50, 23 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I guess you mean [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/%D0%90.%D0%93.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_%28%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0%29.jpeg this picture.] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:13, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:yes and please uploud a picture of [[Nicolas Maduro]]. Like [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fb/Canciller_de_Venezuela_y_Ofrenda_Floral_a_Bol%C3%ADvar_%284%29.jpg this] here--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:25, 24 June 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:When will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:55, 3 July 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==RE:Categories==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You're welcome! - [[User:Markman|Markman]] 12:09, 17 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Flags and Coat of Arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud the flags and the coat of arms of the following countries: [[Guinea-Bissau]], [[Republic of China]], [[Benin]], [[Saint Lucia]], [[Saint Vincent and the Grenadines]], [[Ireland]] and [[Fiji]]. I already asked Karajou but he did´nt answered.--07:59, 21 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:Please uploud them.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 08:42, 28 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== quick reminder ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a quick reminder. Please put category tags on your new articles. I would also try to have internal links to them from related articles (within articles or the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:04, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Your [[John Mighton]] and [[Learning styles]] articles need category tags and so do some of your most recent articles. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:11, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I will try to help out and add categories to a few pages in case Dr. Poor is too busy to do this immediately; he can always change the categories if he feels they don't fit. Thanks! [[User:Taj|Taj]] 18:35, 30 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Conservative, you are correct; thanks, Taj, for quickly filling the gap! :-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:19, 5 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Thanks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I read your article [[Ten year rule]] and it served as further impetus for me to see if this rule of thumb could be shortened via various techniques such as more rapid skill acquisition, improved memorization skills (mnemonics), increasing reading comprehension, time management skills, etc.  I found some additional interesting material on this matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as skill acquisition, a Christian I know came to the United States from Africa and became fluent in English though total immersion in English. He refused to speak his native tongue with his fellow countryman on campus. It worked. He obtained college level English skills within 3 months. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:17, 31 August 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Completing the square==&lt;br /&gt;
You might want to take a look at that article, and weigh in on whether it is &amp;quot;jargon&amp;quot; or otherwise pitched at an inappropriate level.  Perhaps I should have checked with you ''before'' going off the deep end.  I know that you share my interest in making the math articles accessible to the expected audience.  I believe that the topic of solving quadratic equations, and the quadratic formula, and the derivation of same by &amp;quot;completing the square&amp;quot;, are completely appropriate.  I also believe that the article covers this topic in a completely straightforward way.  (If they had used Hilbert spaces to prove the quadratic formula, that would have been a different matter!)  Anyway, feel free to put the jargon tag back if you think it should be there.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 13:20, 8 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't have to check with me before writing anything, and thanks for telling me about changes to [[Completing the square]]. I'm always interested in the reading level of articles, as well as any prerequisites a reader must have. The main point is not to be able to say, &amp;quot;All the information is complete and correct.&amp;quot; Rather, it is for the readers to leave here having learned or understood something which is important to them. In other words, it's not about us (&amp;quot;getting graded&amp;quot;) but about them (&amp;quot;getting edified&amp;quot;). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:32, 9 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
:See &lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic equations]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[quadratic formula]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[completing the square]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Hilbert spaces]] - way beyond [[high school math]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Jargon]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Conservapedia:Accessibility of math articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikimedia Commons==&lt;br /&gt;
Please uploud these images:&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/78/Machno.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Rosa_Luxemburg.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/Nicolas_Maduro_Moros.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:12, 16 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Thank you please uploud these images also:&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG]&lt;br /&gt;
[https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/Hassan_Rouhani_2.jpg]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:03, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You forgot this one: [http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg/220px-%D0%90.%D0%A0.%D0%9B%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%88%D1%8D%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B0_(%D0%B2%D1%8B%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%BA%D0%B0).jpg] --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 10:12, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Can you find one with an English title, instead of Russian letters? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:40, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Sure: [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 11:28, 18 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Will you uploud them?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:24, 22 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Here are the links again: '''[https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_141-2020,_Wei%C3%9Frussland,_Minsk,_Zerst%C3%B6rungen.jpg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cdu-logo.svg] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Komsomol_Emblem.png] [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Horst_Seehofer.JPG] [https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Alexander_Lukashenko_2007.jpg]''' --[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 12:15, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Check the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&amp;amp;type=upload&amp;amp;user=Ed+Poor&amp;amp;page=&amp;amp;year=&amp;amp;month=-1&amp;amp;hide_patrol_log=1 upload log] and tell me which ones you still need. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:23, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The links that I have posted over you.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 13:07, 27 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== &amp;quot;Black man from Brooklyn.&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Correct me if I am wrong, but I do not recall Conservapedia putting the race of the Sandy Hook, Aurora, or Sikh temple shooters on the front page of the website. Why do so this time? [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 12:06, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Do you think it's not relevant? There's been a lot of [[black on white]] crime lately. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:55, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::I think his blackness is as relevant as the whiteness of the majority of the spree killers in this country. [[User:EddyJ|EddyJ]] 22:15, 17 September 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Your articles ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I just went into one of your recent two sentence articles and it didn't have periods after the sentences. If you don't want to put in the effort to write an informative article and can't be bothered to even put periods after your sentences, then please consider not creating any more articles.  Andy just deleted one of our articles that was merely a quote. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe you are capable of writing good articles, but you are choosing to just slap &amp;quot;articles&amp;quot; together instead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You are putting category tags on them now so you are taking some additional effort. But you need to put more effort in them if you are going to create them. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:50, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Okay, how about [[Momentum]]? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:32, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== My response ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sorry for my ill-tempered tone earlier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, this is what I would suggest and I will explain why below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. Use this free tool to make it easy to create 400+ word articles: http://www.wordcounttool.com/ Your article was about 150 words long. This website is competing against other articles for people's attention and so keeping this standard will help this website better compete. Also, if you look at the search engine results, you will generally see the search results are at least 400 words long in length.  For example, see the search results for the word momentum here: [https://www.google.com/search?q=momentum&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high Search results for the word momentum]  and [http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=momentum&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;fr=moz35 More search results for the word momentum]. The articles are significantly over 150 words long. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
People want longer articles that are at least 400 words. The search engines know this. That is why these type of articles are in the search engine results. So instead of creating three 150 word articles, write one article that is about 400 words or more. If a wiki has more search engine results, more traffic will be generated. If more traffic is generated, then more people will tend to sign up as editors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try to write articles that show up first in the search engines. Endeavor to do your best when writing an article. The Apostle Paul said, &amp;quot;Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but {only} one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may win.&amp;quot; (1 Corinthians 9:24).   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. If you use a quote, always cite it as students want a resource they can readily use and their teachers expect them to cite their sources for quotes. Here is a good format to use as it clearly shows the quotations around the quote plus cites the source of the quote: http://www.conservapedia.com/Socialism#Obama_administration_and_land_ownership&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for not responding in anger to my talk page post. I was planning to erase it. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 11:34, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Also, put an attractive picture on your articles if possible. [[Flipperpithecus|This article]] ranks #1 at a popular search engine for a term as can be seen [https://www.google.com/search?q=flipperpithecus&amp;amp;ie=utf-8&amp;amp;oe=utf-8&amp;amp;aq=t&amp;amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;amp;client=firefox-a&amp;amp;safe=high HERE].  It features an attractive picture. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:11, 8 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Please review this block ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been meaning to write to you about the block of EddyJ, but, first, something else has come up.  I believe that the recent block of DanAP is completely wrong.  He wrote a note [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Great_Depression&amp;amp;diff=1068305&amp;amp;oldid=1068242 here], praising your work over the last six years, and was blocked for it.  I believe his note was sincere (and I happen to agree with it, by the way.)  Please do something about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the main issue is EddyJ.  He has been infinitely blocked, with the note &amp;quot;Ask Ed Poor before reinstating this person.&amp;quot;  I'm baffled by that note.  As you may know, I do extensive research of the people at Conservapedia; their interests; their viewpoints; their editing styles; and what kinds of fights they get into.  He has had some interactions with you, but nothing that would suggest that you have some special interest in his block.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He seems to be something of a hard-luck person in terms of being blocked.  He got blocked by you, by accident, which you retracted and apologized for 2 minutes later.  He got blocked 4 times by Markman, who was a vile character.  (I exchanged some email with Markman after his banishment from CP and RW; he's even more vile than you may realize.)  These blocks were clearly just Markman being destructive, and one was overturned by Andy.  Anyway, his relationship with you seems to be &amp;quot;interesting&amp;quot; but respectful.  (Rather like my relationship with you, or with Daniel Pulido&amp;amp;mdash;a very interesting person.)  His only fight with you was over the &amp;quot;Black man&amp;quot; issue, which I don't consider to have been very serious as fights go.  So please review his case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 22:06, 16 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Have him submit a [[writing plan]], and I'll discuss the matter with Andy. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 07:36, 18 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please help me to expand the article [[Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst]] and dont forget the photos.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 14:07, 20 October 2013 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== speedy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please look at the [[:Category:Speedy deletion candidates]] and delete some articles there.--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] 03:26, 16 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Beethoven==&lt;br /&gt;
One finds wonderful things in unexpected places.  I happened to see your edit to the Beethoven article, with the reference to the BBC video series.  I've downloaded it.  3 parts.  It's wonderful!  You might also want to look at a similar 3-part series, also by Charles Hazelwood, about Mozart.  Both series are in three parts.  Go to the first one in each case, and you will see links to the other two.  I'd suggest putting all 3 links in the &amp;quot;see also&amp;quot; sections of the Beethoven and Mozart pages.  The first Mozart article is at [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrXpzOFknN0]; the other two are linked from there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the way, I'm not a great fan of putting in seemingly disconnected quotes, and I know other people have criticized you for the same thing.  I'd suggest saying something as a subsection of the line for the 9th, like &amp;quot;One commentator has said the Beethoven's ninth symphony &amp;quot;remains as potent, obsessive, and bewilderingly brilliant as ever&amp;quot;, giving the BBC link.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 23:21, 29 November 2013 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 5 maintenance tasks that need to be done - some of which could be automated - perhaps you could help as far as the automation of the tasks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some editors like to do wiki maintenance tasks. I started on two of these maintenance task, but I don't have the time to do it all myself. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are 5 maintenance task that need to be done: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1.''' De-orphan pages which have no category tags or links to them from other pages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2.''' Remove about 8% of the wiki pages which are ex-editors' user pages and user talk pages who have not edited in the last 3 years.''' And this task could probably be automated, but it could be done manually too.''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a list of editors/users here: http://conservapedia.com/Special:ListUsers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you go through the list and put delete page tags on the user pages and user talk pages of users who have been inactive for 3 years, then those pages can be deleted. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can also find the pages that need to be deleted by looking at the pages that have these templates on them and then see if the users have been active in the last 3 years: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AUseful+links and http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special:WhatLinksHere&amp;amp;target=Template%3AWelcome  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''3.''' Delete the templates that are never being used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''4.''' Build up the 2 sentence stub articles so they have at least 500 words.  Using the random page search function, I estimate the stub articles are at least 30-40% of the wiki articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''5.''' Within 10 years, about 50% of links become broken links. Xenu's Link Sleuth can crawl your website and find these dead links plus make a report: http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternatively, using this Firefox tool https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/linkchecker/ or this chrome tool https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/link-checker/aibjbgmpmnidnmagaefhmcjhadpffaoi?hl=en these dead links can be found. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did this link maintenance already for the atheism, evolution and homosexuality articles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think these 5 maintenance tasks being done would enhance the user experience for the readers plus these are maintenance tasks that need to be done. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 12:37, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Automating some of these tasks ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I mentioned Xenu's Link Sleuth above in order to help automate spotting the dead links. I think that deleting the the inactive editors who have not edited for 3 years could be automated as well. Maybe using something like [[User:EdBot]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 13:36, 20 June 2014 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I was teach math and English   ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Master Yoda, welcome back you are! ;-) --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:18, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Call myself senior, I would not! :-) [[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 14:53, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Great to see you again here, Ed!  I look forward to learning more from your edits.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 21:12, 14 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Can you Help? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi Ed. It's good to see you back. I have been wanting to join the [[Creationwiki]] and [[Citizendium]] encyclopedia projects. I recognized your name on both sites. Last year I asked on your talk page but you were away at the time. Now that you are back, can you tell me how can I get an account for [[Citizendium]]? There is a [[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Special:RequestAccount| forum for registering]] but they are testing it, and I do not want to give away my info without receiving my account. So, how can I request an account where I will be assured of receiving it? And, how do I get a [[Creationwiki]] account? I requested once, but I got no confirmation email either in my inbox or spam folder. It appears that Hotmail has problems. I don't think I will be requesting either at present, but when I am ready, how can I request without having to wait? [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::I would like to tell you that I will still edit Conservapedia even after I join the above sites. I just will edit them in addition. I originally edited [[Wikipedia]], but I have left because I could not agree with the viewpoints there. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 14:37, 15 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Sorry, I don't know anything about that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:10, 16 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== small request ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second, could you please put category tags on your new articles. For example, this article [[Rudd Weatherwax]]. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 11:26, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Category tags, got it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 11:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::re Category:Animal trainers, Category:Dog trainers, Category:American male film actors: [[Conservapedia:Editing_article_and_talk_pages#Categories|Unlike articles, categories are to be in title case (e.g. Australian Cities and Towns, not Australian cities and towns), and are to be plural where applicable.]] --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 14:55, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The recursion joke ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was used in Donald Knuth's ''The Art of Computer Programming'' in 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And hello again!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been trying to keep the math and science stuff from going off the deep end over the last couple of years.  Not really hard; you and I seem to have scared off the flamers pretty well.  But something came up very recently, that you might want to look at.  See the quadrupole stuff in [[Gravitational waves]].  It's beyond me, and I'm way too busy fighting lower-level battles at present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Good to see you back.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 12:24, 18 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Sorry, Sam, I'm going to stick to the K-12 curriculum. That's what I know best. But it's great to be back! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== [[Internet Explorer]] ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Ed. Years ago you had the article on [[Internet Explorer]] removed due to its poor sourcing, or, I am not sure what, but it is still on the talkpage. I have recreated the article with a screenshot at the side. I have posted this message to ask if you would like to help in developing the article. I am not very good at finding sources or researching, although I do what I can. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 23:01, 24 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Oh, [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Internet_Explorer&amp;amp;direction=prev&amp;amp;oldid=903283 this version] doesn't seem so bad - after 4 or 5 years. Do as you like. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 23:58, 28 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thank you. I have restored to that version, but retained the screenshot and the category of Internet. [[User:U.U|U.U]] ([[User talk:U.U|talk]]) 19:44, 29 February 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bots==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello!  As I mentioned on [[User_talk:Aschlafly#Bots_.28and_other_web_services_and_resources.29|Mr. Schlafly's talk page]], I was wondering about the possibility of trying to help CP by running a bot.  I have a limited understanding of PHP and this kind of bot, but am fairly tech savvy and have created and used other sorts of bots on occasion.  [[User:JDano|JDano]] mentioned that you are the only person of CP who has successfully set up a bot, so I just thought I would ask you what you think.  It seems to me this would be a nice thing to do, but I'm not exactly sure how to proceed.  I'm also unsure of whether Mr. Schlafly would approve of me trying this, and whether it would even work, or if this wouldn't work with the permissions level I have here.  I have a stable web server and a slightly less stable private server.  Any thoughts?  Thanks! --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 15:23, 12 April 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:If you haven't disappeared, I might point out that my bot only worked with a previous version of MediaWiki. Let me know if you're still interested. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 20:44, 19 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm still here, and thanks for getting back to me!  I am also still interested, though I'm uncertain if:&lt;br /&gt;
#I am able to do this&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If I'm allowed to run a bot, since I'm not an admin&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;lt;strike&amp;gt;If bots are even allowed on CP--someone thought they were altogether disallowed.&amp;lt;/strike&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
#If there is a sufficient need to a for for me to bother (and also bother others, like you)&lt;br /&gt;
::That is annoying that your bot isn't compatible with the update, but is there a way to take your basic code and put it into a new &amp;quot;adaption&amp;quot; framework?  As far as my own attempt, I'm finding a number of off-the-shelf &amp;quot;bots&amp;quot; which are freely available, but pre-configured for Wikipedia.  I don't know if they could be used or not, but it might be an option. Do you have any other thoughts? --[[User:DavidB4|David B]] ([[User talk:DavidB4|talk]]) 00:16, 20 June 2016 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Since my last post, I have gotten a few answers to my questions.  I also now have a working [[User:DavidB4-bot|batch edit bot]].  It has a lot of limitations and a few bugs, but it's a start.  I would like it if one of use could get a sort of vandalism reduction/reversion bot working, as you previously had.  I in no way want to steal the task from you, but if you can't get something like this working, I would appreciate some guidance as to what previously worked and how it failed.  In any case, I would very much like an improved edit bot, as what I have now is a simple, static cue of batch tasks to execute, either once or recursively. This is proving useful, but not as useful as I would like.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I deleted my user page, but still appears in the history. Please help me delete my pages at conservapedia.com and my conservapedia.com account. Please delete them.  (data-provider)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Merry Christmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Merry Christmas.gif|cebter|260px]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Merry Christmas!  And have a happy New Year's Day. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:49, 24 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Talmud and &amp;quot;taking things out of context&amp;quot; ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, I'm no anti-Semite. I may have my issues with the Talmud, but it strictly has to deal with how they treated God (not even Jesus, just God himself). And I would still fight to the death to protect Judaism and Israel itself especially from the likes of Islam, Stormfront, the KKK and the like. The types of Jews I do have immense respect for are the ones who adhere to the Torah only, or at least primarily.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second of all, surely you must have seen the parts in those quotes that specifically state where those quotes came from. And for the record, there were a few Jewish people who confirmed a lot of what was said in those quotes from the Talmud. Case in point: https://youtu.be/YSy6ENVAJlY And there was one person who converted to Christianity and testified what was in the Talmud. For example, Bernard Lazare, a French Jew who upon converting testified the Talmud's role in the Jewish revolts and also what actually was said in the Talmud.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Third of all, I get enraged whenever someone claims I took something &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot;, and in fact am enraged with the phrase itself, because I only see it as an excuse to cover up bad things, like when people claim that Lenin took Marx &amp;quot;out of context&amp;quot; when he did those evil things even when those were exactly the stuff Marx demanded that Communism should be done in.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I used to naively believe that the Talmud was part of God's design, that the Jews still worshipped God even if they don't worship Jesus himself, but they don't, they if anything make him more like a plaything, and that I will NOT tolerate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:14, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Well, try to get a handle on your rage and focus your efforts on improving articles. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:21, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm not actually enraged, or at least, I'm keeping a pretty tight lid on my rage, so I am getting quite a bit of a handle on my rage actually. Didn't resort to name calling. Anyways, I reverted your edit, because, 1., those quotes have been verified by countless people, some of whom were Rabbis themselves, and 2., if you really wanted to address that bit, you should have responded to it directly, not removed it. I also added your reply back in, though I had to change it slightly since, due to the quotes still being there, it wouldn't make sense to mention you removed the quotes. And again, those quotes weren't taken out of context, as even Yossi Gurvitz and Bernard Lazare verified those quotes were accurate. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:24, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest you get back to what we were doing before you supplied all those Talmud quotes. Wasn't it something to do with Trump and a so-called &amp;quot;[[Muslim registry]]&amp;quot;? I could use some help with that. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:27, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Fine, I'll help with that, as long as you stop taking those quotes out. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 15:28, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::You can appeal your block to Andy, Conservative, or any other admin. But issuing ultimatums and refusing alternatives is not a part of collaborative editing. Bye! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:31, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:::I wasn't making an ultimatum, nor was I refusing alternatives (if anything, I actually DID try to compromise by letting you retain your response while still keeping the quotes). Ironically, I WAS about to make a contribution to the Muslim Registry article when you blocked me. [[User:Pokeria1|Pokeria1]] ([[User talk:Pokeria1|talk]]) 16:58, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Sigh. You're right. I guess I was too hasty: no one else at Conservapedia whose opinion I value agreed with your block!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::Forgive me? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 22:07, 30 December 2016 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IRC ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
After some discussion (on [[User_talk:DavidB4#Conservapedia_IRC_channel|my talk page]] and [[User_talk:Aschlafly#IRC|Andy's]]) it has been decided that I start an [[Internet Relay Chat]] channel for Conservapedia, since our old one has been dead since 2009.  It is now registered and somewhat set up.  I don't know if you use IRC or are interested in doing so, but anyone with block privileges on Conservapedia can also get block privileges on the new IRC channel.  Unfortunately, IRC accounts are deleted after 30 days of being unused, so unless you plan on using the IRC at least once a month, there is probably not much point in registering.  In any case, feel free to try it out--if you account gets deleted, we can always make another one later.  If you are interested, please let me know!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The IRC channel is: #conservapedia @irc.accessIRC.net&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Let me know if you have any questions or need anything else, also! --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 15:46, 11 April 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I know you like doing technical things and probably would know how to implement the project below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you could implement this project, that would be excellent. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable?  ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can someone edit this template so the useful links are readable? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The blue links on a dark red background is hard to read.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Sorry for the late reply - I haven't been checking CP every day. Here is how to [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 turn off] the background on the useful links, and here is how I [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Template:Welcome&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=1355842 made the background light yellow]. Hope it helps. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 08:56, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, some people have started to edit Conservapedia and then quickly gave up because they didn't know how to edit a wiki.  I noted about 3 people who did this. There are probably many more who quit but didn't say anything. I added a link entitled &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot;.  But I believe there are various versions of the welcome template so my link is not on all welcome template versions. For example, the welcome template that JPatt uses didn't incorporate my &amp;quot;How to edit a wiki&amp;quot; link. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does the newest version of the Wikimedia software allow for WYSIWYG editing? In other words &amp;quot;What you see is what you get&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The newest version of the Wikimedia software does not have the counter at the bottom of the pages. I understand why Andy Schlafly likes the counters at the bottom. I like the counters too. I guess there might be an extension to add the counters to the newest version of Wikimedia. But after all is said and done, having WYSIWYG editing could greatly increase the participation rate at this wiki and lower the rate of people falling out because they don't know how to edit a wiki. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:40, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
==== Here is the welcome to Wikipedia and it is much better and legible ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Plate of cookies.jpg|thumb|300px|Some cookies to welcome you! [[File:Face-smile.svg|25px]]]] [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|Welcome to Wikipedia]], Conservative! I am [[User:This lousy T-shirt|This lousy T-shirt]] and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Knox490|your contributions]]. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out [[Wikipedia:Questions]], or feel free to leave me a message on [[User talk:This lousy T-shirt|my talk page]] or type ''{{tl|helpme}}'' at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message!  I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Introduction|Introduction]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|The five pillars of Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page|How to edit a page]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Help:Contents|Help pages]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Wikipedia:Article development|How to write a great article]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ten_Simple_Rules_for_Editing_Wikipedia Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia].&lt;br /&gt;
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedian]]! Also, when you post on [[Wikipedia:Talk page|talk pages]] you should [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|sign your name]] using four tildes (&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;~~~~&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.  Again, welcome!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think Conservapedia needs a better greeting. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 19:02, 19 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
::Thanks Ed. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 09:05, 23 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BLOCK THIS GUY!!!!!!!!&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 16:37, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Done, but you've been around long enough. Why don't you ask Andy for blocking rights? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 16:39, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::I'm confident he would use block right appropriately, but Andy might be hesitant to give the privilege to Sam.  Sam has been in a number of disputes, and has been banned a few times as well.  I'd support Sam getting the privilege, (I'd say he's more than earned it since I've been here alone, nevermind all the time before that) but I don't know if it could happen. Besides, aren't privileges generally given, not requested? --[[User:DavidB4|&amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;ForestGreen&amp;quot;&amp;gt;David B&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;([[User talk:DavidB4|TALK]])&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 21:09, 27 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::David, you have hit the nail right on the head.  Blocking rights are given, not requested.  And my long career here is full of blocks (19 of them), including blocks by people who were later revealed to be vandals or parodists:  DanielPulido and the notorious Markman.  And illicit blocks by &amp;quot;assistants&amp;quot; over content disputes.  (I seem to have a knack for upsetting bullies.)  And several blocks by my friend Conservative; we get along much better now.  And two by Ed Poor himself; I think we get along much better now; I won't bore you with the details.  When you've been around as long as I have, you develop a history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no interest in getting any special powers.  I like to think of myself as a &amp;quot;conscientious objector&amp;quot; in these wars.  People know that if they wrongly block me, I can't and won't fight back.  But others will (hopefully) undo the damage.  I think a lot of people respect me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::But when big vandal attacks come along, and I can't get anyone else to take action, that's when I wish I had block powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::Thanks to both of you for your kind words.  [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 18:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::::SamHB, you brought those blocks (none of which were &amp;quot;illicit&amp;quot; like you claim) down on yourself for the exact reasons DavidB4 pointed out, as well as for repeatedly and insistently putting liberal POV into some articles (including even now, with the [[fake news]] article two days ago) and for provoking fights (also including now). If you didn't insist on trying to turn Conservapedia into Liberalpedia, you wouldn't get chastized by the admins as much as you do. [[User:Northwest|Northwest]] ([[User talk:Northwest|talk]]) 19:43, 28 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::::It's true that I've had a hair-trigger for blocks, but you might not know that I often agonize over these and consult Andy by private email afterwards. It's not easy to admit that I've overstepped, but my record shows that I have SOMETIMES unblocked someone after a few moments (or days?) of reflection. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 10:31, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unrelated to what's above, Ed Poor, I see that several of your recent blocks have been indefinite. I used to do this a lot, but I no longer do because it can cause many innocent people to lose access to CP. Oftentimes, IP addresses get shifted around, so different, unrelated people end up using the same address at different times. That means that one indefinite block could affect many people over time. Also, vandals don't tend to be the type of people in a perminent location, so it is unlikely they will be using the same IP address after some time even if the address is the same in the same location. I recommend five-year blocks instead with even shorter blocks necessary for less serious vandalism. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:1990%27sguy&amp;amp;diff=1304184&amp;amp;oldid=1303142 DavidB4 explained it better on my talk page.] Thanks! --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 10:40, 29 June 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== WOTUS ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is [[Waters of the United States rule]] and [[Clean Water Rule]] the same thing? If so, they should be merged. --[[User:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy]] ([[User talk:1990&amp;amp;#39;sguy|talk]]) 13:48, 1 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The articles should be merged, although the two rules are slightly different. Can you do it? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 19:38, 2 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::There are many rules implementing the Clean Water Act.  Shouldn't you just have one comprehensive article about the Clean Water Act?  Also, we should have a separate article about the definition of &amp;quot;Navigatable Waters of the United States&amp;quot;, because this term defines federal jurisdiction in contexts beyond just the Clean Water Act.  It also defines the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers and the  old Federal Power Commission (now  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) with respect to the licensing of hydroelectric projects. [[User:JDano|JDano]] ([[User talk:JDano|talk]]) 04:54, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::I have no objection, as long as readers will be able to understand what each of those hot-button phrases means, politically:&lt;br /&gt;
:::*[[Navigable waters of the United States]] has nothing to do with navigation or shipping. It's merely a compromise between polluters and farmers on the one hand, and clean-water freaks or preservationists on the other. &lt;br /&gt;
:::*Similarly, the [[Clean Water Rule]] is not mostly about clean drinking water for people, but it also restricts legitimate (farm) use and delights the [[no-use]] environmental lobby&lt;br /&gt;
:::*The [[WOTUS]] rule is a variation on the Clean Water Rule that isn't so tough on farmers filling in a swamp (see [[Wetlands]]) to get more crop land.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:::If you two can make one article out of all this mess, go for it! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:09, 3 July 2017 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi Uncle Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I'm finally here. I would love to get in touch with you again. You are a wonderful person, always very friendly. --[[User:Annie Poor|Annie Poor]] ([[User talk:Annie Poor|talk]]) 13:10, 19 April 2019 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
== Great to see you! ==&lt;br /&gt;
Great to see you, Ed!  Hope all is well.  It's fantastic to see a longtime friend again.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 22:42, September 20, 2022 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hi dear Ed ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
God bless you Ed Poor.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
RobS is actually againt this LT behavior. &lt;br /&gt;
It's LT who blames Jews for Hitler, not RobS.&lt;br /&gt;
This is about LT, he just pasted it all from his talk page on to here.[[User:Dianne3000|Dianne3000]] ([[User talk:Dianne3000|talk]]) 11:38, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Nice quotes on leadership on your user page ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I liked the quotes on leadership that are on your user page.  I copied them to this page:  [[User:Conservative/Quotes]].  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:56, October 2, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hooray!!!! ==&lt;br /&gt;
You made my day, Ed!!!  So good to see you again.  I have the good memory of attending a certain college speech with you and others perhaps a decade ago.  So glad you're still active!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 17:57, October 15, 2024 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Larry Sanger==&lt;br /&gt;
I note you have good things to say about [[Larry Sanger]] who has professed his belief in [[Christianity]] in recent years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Conservative]] made the assertion that Larry Sanger was an [[atheist]] (totally untrue) and either [https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;amp;diff=2070366&amp;amp;oldid=1976745 condoned or was a practitioner of bestiality] which was repeated in [https://therightscoop.com/why-should-a-conservative-bother-using-wikipedia/ conservative media]. After Sanger's conversion from [[agnosticism]] to Christianity I cleaned up the Wikipedia page and at least a half dozen other pages User:Conservative copy pasted his [[spam]] into. But he steadfastly refuses to clean up at least 342 other pages with his assertions, nor change his editing habits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|''The Truth. Just Putin It Out There'']]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 02:21, November 16, 2024 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Two decades ago, Larry said he was an atheist, but I never held that against him, particularly because I was at the time an active member in the most unpopular new religion in America. Both he and Jimbo Wales supported me as a preeminent expositor of &amp;quot;neutrality&amp;quot;. If there is anything that needs to be cleaned up, post it here or email me at uncle_ed_poor@yahoo.com. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 12:29, November 23, 2024 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=X-Men&amp;diff=2087454</id>
		<title>X-Men</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=X-Men&amp;diff=2087454"/>
		<updated>2024-11-23T17:23:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Elon Musk, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Tulsi Gabbard, Vivek Ramaswamy, and JD Vance&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''X-Men''' are a team of [[comic book]] [[superhero]]es from the [[Marvel Comics|Marvel]] Universe.  The team members are [[mutation|mutants]], each inborn with an ability that goes beyond what is humanly possible.  In this way—being human but possessing abilities that go beyond the possible—mutants are unusual.  Such mutants are subject to discrimination in the Marvel Universe, and as such must keep their status secret, but the founder of the team believes that peaceful coexistence is possible, and that mutants can use their powers to help all of humanity.  Notably, their first mission was fighting Magneto, a mutant supremacist who believed that normal humanity's time had come and gone.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The initial members were Charles Xavier (Professor X), a powerful telepath, who founded and funded the initial team under the guise of it being a &amp;quot;school for gifted youngsters&amp;quot;; Scott Summers (Cyclops), who can project bolts of force from his eyes; Henry McCoy (Beast), an immensely strong, agile, tough, and athletic man; Robert Drake (Iceman), able to generate cold from his body; Warren Worthington III (Angel), possessed of feathered wings and with different enough physiology to let him fly using them; and Jean Grey (Marvel Girl), who possesses telekinetic ability. Perhaps the most notable member of the team is not a student at the school; it is Wolverine (Logan), a mutant with enhanced strength, speed, and instincts, known for flashing claws made from a near-indestructible adamantium skeleton when he is angry. Many stories within the comics explore Wolverine's history and psychology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the comic's first issue in 1963, the roster of the team has changed.  Characters have left, joined up, changed their code names, switched sides, died, been resurrected, and developed new powers or new ways to use them.  The current roster actually consists of several teams, as many more mutants have been found all over the world and many have joined or created teams with deep ties to the X-Men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being created in the '60s, the comic was deliberately written to be a metaphor for the social issues of the time, such as discrimination, specifically racism (despite the entire team being composed of caucasians).  Since then, the themes of the various titles with the &amp;quot;X&amp;quot; brand have been expanded to be a metaphor for tolerance and acceptance in general—for other races, for other modes of belief, and other sexual orientations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the books' premise does not require evolution to be factual—mutations are known to occur—the premise is explored in a way that assumes it is.  A storyline in the early 2000s suggested that &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; humanity, ''homo sapiens sapiens'', would be extinct within a century, replaced entirely with the mutant species ''homo sapiens superior''.  Since then, a new event decimated the mutant population and prevented the mutant gene—the &amp;quot;x-factor&amp;quot;—from being passed on to new children, meaning it would be mutants going extinct within a generation, but this is unlikely to last, as some of the effects of the event are already &amp;quot;wearing off&amp;quot; or have otherwise been rectified.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The X-Men franchise spawned a series of movies in the 2000s and is still popular today.&lt;br /&gt;
It has also inspired [[Jordan Peterson]] to propose a &amp;quot;Trump X-Men Team&amp;quot; of [[Elon Musk]], [[Robert F. Kennedy Jr.]], [[Tulsi Gabbard]], [[Vivek Ramaswamy]], and [[JD Vance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Films==&lt;br /&gt;
*''X-Men'' (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
*''X2: X-Men United'' (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
*''X-Men: The Last Stand'' (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
*''X-Men Origins: Wolverine'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
*''X-Men: First Class'' (2011)&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Wolverine'' (2013)&lt;br /&gt;
*''X-Men: Days of Future Past'' (2014)&lt;br /&gt;
*''Deadpool'' (2016)&lt;br /&gt;
*''X-Men: Apocalypse'' (2016)&lt;br /&gt;
*''Logan'' (2017)&lt;br /&gt;
*''Deadpool 2'' (2018)&lt;br /&gt;
*''Dark Phoenix'' (2019)&lt;br /&gt;
*''The New Mutants'' (2020)&lt;br /&gt;
*''Deadpool 3'' (2024)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Superheroes]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Comic Characters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Entertainment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marvel]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2085268</id>
		<title>User:Ed Poor</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Ed_Poor&amp;diff=2085268"/>
		<updated>2024-11-12T20:48:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Retired teacher&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I taught math and English at a private school in New York City until my retirement in 2023.&lt;br /&gt;
I believe in being bold, a habit I learned to cherish at Wikipedia. But I also believe in correcting my mistakes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;one of the greatest and most influential Conservapedia sysops&amp;quot; - Anonymous&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am first and foremost a believer in science, and yet I believe that God is the First Scientist. I believe Romans 1:20 provides a clue to the fact of God's [[Creation]].&lt;br /&gt;
*&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have made over 20,000 edits to Conservapedia, although a lot of these are merely quoted [[/factoids]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Years at Conservapedia: {{age|2007|3|19}}&lt;br /&gt;
:Years at Wikipedia: {{age|2001|11|29}} &lt;br /&gt;
:*I started over 1,100 articles there.&lt;br /&gt;
:Years opposed to [[atheism]]: {{age|1977|8|1}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:I maintain accounts at a few other wiki projects.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some people regard me as a &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.nationalcenter.org/2005/07/poor-uneducated-and-easy-to-command.html &amp;quot;poor, undereducated and easily led&amp;quot;] religious man. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Favorite movies==&lt;br /&gt;
In no particular order:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Old Yeller]] - {{years ago|1957}} years old&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes to add to articles==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lack of freedom under Communist rule===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maltz’s experience with a “thought control committee” of the Hollywood Party [http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=8914]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Global warming theory===&lt;br /&gt;
“OVER the past 15 years air temperatures at the Earth’s surface have been flat while greenhouse-gas emissions have continued to soar. The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO2 put there by humanity since 1750. And yet, as James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, observes, ‘the five-year mean global temperature has been flat for a decade. . . .’” [http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/04/28/the-disgraceful-episode-of-lysenkoism-brings-us-global-warming-theory/2/#175bfcee2364]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reputation of the [[United States]], [[Arab media]], [[Soviet propaganda]], [[Western imperialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*The US fares poorly in Arab media, partly because it was the target of Soviet propaganda for a half century and inherited all the criticism of Western imperialism. [http://www.amazon.com/Un-Civil-War-Words-International/dp/0275993930/ref=la_B001IYVP8S_1_1?s=books&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1381925797&amp;amp;sr=1-1 Choice] - review of ''(Un)Civil War of Words: Media and Politics in the Arab World'' by [[Mamoun Fandy]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[drive-in]] or&lt;br /&gt;
[[drive-in restaurant]]&lt;br /&gt;
*The drive-in restaurant was a phenomenon that sprang up in the early thirties, and it was becoming very popular. Rather than being invited into a dining room to eat, customers would drive into a parking lot around a small restaurant, place their orders with carhops, and receive their food on trays right in their cars. The food was served on china plates complete with glassware and metal utensils. It was a timely idea in a society that was becoming faster paced and increasingly mobile. [http://www.scribd.com/doc/170418702/The-21-Irrefutable-Laws-of-Leadership-Workbook-Revised-Updated]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ideas about leadership==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;You can have everything in life you want, if you will just help other people get what they want.&amp;quot; - [[Zig Ziglar]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Cherish your visions and your dreams as they are the children of your soul, the blueprints of your ultimate achievements.&amp;quot; - [[Napoleon Hill]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The key to success is to focus our conscious mind on things we desire not things we fear.&amp;quot; - [[Brian Tracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Success is getting what you want. Happiness is wanting what you get.&amp;quot; - [[Dale Carnegie]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Obstacles are necessary for success because in selling, as in all careers of importance, victory comes only after many struggles and countless defeats.&amp;quot; - [[Og Mandino]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;A real decision is measured by the fact that you've taken a new action. If there's no action, you haven't truly decided.&amp;quot; - [[Tony Robbins]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;If you can't control your anger, you are as helpless as a city without walls waiting to be attacked.&amp;quot; - [[The Book of Proverbs]]&lt;br /&gt;
#A mediocre person tells. A good person explains. A superior person demonstrates. A great person inspires others to see for themselves.&amp;quot; - [[Harvey Mackay]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Freedom, privileges, options, must constantly be exercised, even at the risk of inconvenience.&amp;quot; - [[Jack Vance]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;Take care of your body. It's the only place you have to live.&amp;quot; - [[Jim Rohn]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;The number of times I succeed is in direct proportion to the number of times I can fail and keep on trying.&amp;quot; - [[Tom Hopkins]]&lt;br /&gt;
#&amp;quot;You have everything you need to build something far bigger than yourself.&amp;quot; - [[Seth Godin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==To Do List==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CPUSA]]&lt;br /&gt;
*:The Party tried very hard to present Communist or Socialist ideas as an advance in America’s development that was in fact rooted in American tradition. Well, they failed in this. The American people couldn’t buy it. The association with the Soviet Union was too powerful.  I remember one slogan, “Defend the Soviet Union.” It was not “Defend the Socialist Idea” or “Defend a Fairer System.”  It was “Defend the Soviet Union.” It was a tough slogan to sell; impossible. &lt;br /&gt;
*the so-called anti-[[fascism]] of the CPUSA:&lt;br /&gt;
*:Moreover, the radical shifts and reversals in the policy of the CPUSA did not reflect developments on the American socio-economic scene itself, and were not reactions to them. On the contrary, they had their source in a foreign country and its interests, in the specific responses of the government of the USSR to events in Europe. One classic case is of course the American Party’s faithful support of the Hitler-Stalin Pact of 1939-1941. The alliance was a startling reversal after years of proclaimed Party dedication to ferocious “anti-Fascism.” Instead, the line switched from “anti-Fascism” to “peace,” i.e. a ferocious dedication to keeping the US from aiding the nations fighting Hitler (“The Yanks are NOT coming! We’ll be for peace until the cows come home!” to quote Herbert Biberman). Yet just as the Party’s staunch “anti-Fascism” ended the moment that Stalin became Hitler’s friend, so the Party’s staunch belief in “the peace movement” ended the moment the Soviet Union was attacked by the Nazis on 22 June 1941. Then the war against Hitler finally became justified.20&lt;br /&gt;
*[[intellectual control]]&lt;br /&gt;
*:the Party in Hollywood not only attempted to control the minds of its members, but that it was a secret organization.&lt;br /&gt;
*:#Paul Jarrico in a 1983 interview noted without much comment that it was a Party rule that no one who was in analysis could be a member of the Party: “It was a security rule.” This comes right after he asserts that the claims of Party thought-control over its membership are greatly exaggerated. See Jarrico in McGilligan and Buhle, 344-345.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[American Communists]]&lt;br /&gt;
*the [[lionization of the Unfriendly Ten]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bartley Crum]] was wary of&lt;br /&gt;
*:the American Communists, because they were not in fact independent individuals but were men under stern Party intellectual discipline.  He found them continually deceptive as to their intentions and motives. Crum was repelled by the Communists’ “rude, plodding dogmatism, their habit of secrecy,” and that included the behavior of the Party lawyers assigned to work with him on the case. [http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=8914]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[inequality in America]] [http://www.forbes.com/sites/quickerbettertech/2011/12/12/if-i-was-a-poor-black-kid/]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[gun control laws]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[right-to-carry laws]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[gun ownership and crime]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Castle Doctrine]] - you don't have to retreat as far as possible before defending yourself&lt;br /&gt;
*[[federal assault weapons ban]] 1994-2004&lt;br /&gt;
*[[gun rights cases]] decided by the [[Supreme Court]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DC handgun ban]] - struck down in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chicago handgun ban]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[impact of gun bans on crime and suicide rates]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[gun ownership]] and gov't regulation of it&lt;br /&gt;
*[[multiple victim public shootings]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[gun show regulations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Brady law]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==General==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Christ-our-pilot.jpg|thumb|279px|Let Him be my guide.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Archives: [[/archive 01|01]]  [[/archive 02|02]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{User:Ed Poor/quote{{ #expr: {{rand|5}} }}}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==More about me, myself and I==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3AListUsers&amp;amp;username=&amp;amp;group=sysop&amp;amp;limit=100 Sysops]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Special:Contributions/Ed Poor|Contribs]] • &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;002bb8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[{{fullurl:Special:Log/block|user={{urlencode:Ed Poor}}}} Blocks]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; • &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;002bb8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[{{fullurl:Special:Log/protect|user={{urlencode:Ed Poor}}}} Protects]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; • &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;002bb8&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[{{fullurl:Special:Log/delete|user={{urlencode:Ed Poor}}}} Deletions]&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Special:Ipblocklist|List of blocked IPs and users]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userboxtop}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User Wikipedian}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User OEC}}  &lt;br /&gt;
{{Userbox |red|red|[[Image:Bost.jpg‎|45px]]|This user is a '''Boston Red Sox''' fan.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{User talk self}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Userboxbottom}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[/math]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/template]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Admin stuff==&lt;br /&gt;
I am a SYSOP on this site, elected unanimously by the student board on my 6th day here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True wikis have simple, clear rules. Otherwise it is a mobocracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I learned the basics of [[PHP]] in May 2007 and created an online database for my church's missionary outreach effort in Harlem, NY. Plans to expand the database application to the regional or national level went nowhere, but I did get hired as webmaster of UpTV.org and did some consulting on a major overhaul on the http://www.upf.org website. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Q: Is this your personal blog, or what?!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A: No, but it just so happens that nearly every word I type, link I create, article or template I start - gains instant and widespread acceptance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Q: Isn't that a bit &amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;arrogant&amp;quot;&amp;gt;arrogant&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A: Okay, I guess you're right. Perhaps I should be more humble.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wikipedia and Conservapedia==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There was a time when Wikipedia was a [[meritocracy]], and I rose rapidly through the ranks then. I got Jimbo to create the Mediation and Arbitration committees, so he wouldn't have to be the sheriff all the time. I became the first elected bureaucrat, and pioneered the system whereby admins could enforce rules without having to take everything before a committee. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But I didn't see the [[anti-elitism]] creeping up and choking the life out of the place. [[Larry Sanger]] was right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My only worry about Conservapedia is that it '''might''' make the equal and opposite mistake; it has certainly been accused of it, hundreds of times. But senior staff have been amazingly tolerant of opposing ideas here so far and I reason to hope they will continue to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Etc.==&lt;br /&gt;
My interests include history, religion, and science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've also taught SAT math prep, so if your article has any errors in arithmetic or statistics, prepare for a shock. I might just delete your entire contribution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm also pretty good at science, logic, history, etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any trouble on the site, a question about my edits/blocks/redirects/protects etc. please post on my talk page or email me and I will address them ASAP. I am open to working with everyone who demonstrates a genuine will to improve this site through their work. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My user talk page has been vandalized countless times; I guess liberals are in denial and hate having to face their problems as much as any (other) addict.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Subpages==&lt;br /&gt;
[[/devil]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[/coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==NPOV==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the most commonly violated principles of neutral editing at Wikipedia:&lt;br /&gt;
* It is inappropriate to remove blocks of well-referenced information which is germane to the subject from articles on the grounds that the information advances a point of view. Wikipedia's NPOV policy contemplates inclusion of all significant points of view.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wikipedia's neutral point-of-view (NPOV) policy contemplates inclusion of all significant points of view regarding any subject on which there is division of opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
* Wikipedia articles should contain information regarding the subject of the article; they are not a platform for advocacy regarding one or another point of view regarding the topic. Sweeping generalizations which label the subject of an article as one thing or another are inappropriate and not a substitute for adequate research regarding details of actual positions and actions which can speak for themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
*Injection of personal viewpoints regarding the subject of an article is inappropriate and not to be resolved by debate among the editors of an article, but referenced from reputable outside resources. See [[Wikipedia:No original research]] and [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a soapbox|Wikipedia is not a soapbox]] or a vehicle for [[propaganda]] advocacy or [[advertising]].&lt;br /&gt;
*A strong point of view expressed elsewhere on a subject does not necessarily mean POV-pushing editing on Wikipedia; that can only be determined by the edits to Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
* Unexplained deletions of portions of controversial articles are unacceptable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am on probation at Wikipedia for trying to point out some of these problems and just might get my account blocked! :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Use Google to search for ''Ed Poor probation'' &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=Ed+Poor+probation]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_Effect&amp;diff=2084789</id>
		<title>Trump Effect</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_Effect&amp;diff=2084789"/>
		<updated>2024-11-09T21:44:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: Qatar has agreed to remove Hamas from its territory&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''&amp;quot;Trump Effect&amp;quot;''' – 72 hours after winning the 2024 Election: [https://twitter.com/ByronDonalds/status/1855264141277073733?t=_nbq1I5aekqCWA8SsrAZjg&amp;amp;s=19]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;President-elect Donald Trump just won reelection on Tuesday and he won’t even be taking office until Jan. 20, 2025, But good things already seem to be happening, just with the knowledge he won.&amp;quot; [https://ground.news/article/trump-effect-qatar-reportedly-makes-huge-move-regarding-hamas-leaders?utm_source=mobile-app&amp;amp;utm_medium=newsroom-share]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stock market immediately soared, with the Dow topping 44,000 for the first time and the S&amp;amp;P 500 closing at a record high.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First female Chief of Staff appointed: &amp;quot;Wiles is a longtime GOP operative who is deeply respected&amp;quot; [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/who-susie-wiles-trumps-white-house-chief-staff-5-things-know]&lt;br /&gt;
*NYC to stop giving debit cards to illegals&lt;br /&gt;
*US companies bring production home&lt;br /&gt;
*Stock market hitting all-time-highs&lt;br /&gt;
*Bitcoin hitting all-time-highs&lt;br /&gt;
*Newest migrant caravan breaking-up&lt;br /&gt;
*Qatar agrees to evict Hamas leaders&lt;br /&gt;
*:&amp;quot;Qatar has agreed to remove Hamas from its territory after Hamas refused to conduct genuine hostage, ceasefire negotiations&amp;quot; [https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-828197]&lt;br /&gt;
*Hamas wants &amp;quot;immediate&amp;quot; end to war&lt;br /&gt;
*Taliban claims to want &amp;quot;new chapter&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*China wants &amp;quot;peaceful coexistence&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is &amp;quot;ready&amp;quot; to speak with the US&lt;br /&gt;
*EU wants to buy US gas, not Russian gas&lt;br /&gt;
*Ukraine leaders in talks with Trump/Elon&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_Effect&amp;diff=2084788</id>
		<title>Trump Effect</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_Effect&amp;diff=2084788"/>
		<updated>2024-11-09T21:41:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: &amp;quot;Wiles is a longtime GOP operative who is deeply respected&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''&amp;quot;Trump Effect&amp;quot;''' – 72 hours after winning the 2024 Election: [https://twitter.com/ByronDonalds/status/1855264141277073733?t=_nbq1I5aekqCWA8SsrAZjg&amp;amp;s=19]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;President-elect Donald Trump just won reelection on Tuesday and he won’t even be taking office until Jan. 20, 2025, But good things already seem to be happening, just with the knowledge he won.&amp;quot; [https://ground.news/article/trump-effect-qatar-reportedly-makes-huge-move-regarding-hamas-leaders?utm_source=mobile-app&amp;amp;utm_medium=newsroom-share]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stock market immediately soared, with the Dow topping 44,000 for the first time and the S&amp;amp;P 500 closing at a record high.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First female Chief of Staff appointed: &amp;quot;Wiles is a longtime GOP operative who is deeply respected&amp;quot; [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/who-susie-wiles-trumps-white-house-chief-staff-5-things-know]&lt;br /&gt;
*NYC to stop giving debit cards to illegals&lt;br /&gt;
*US companies bring production home&lt;br /&gt;
*Stock market hitting all-time-highs&lt;br /&gt;
*Bitcoin hitting all-time-highs&lt;br /&gt;
*Newest migrant caravan breaking-up&lt;br /&gt;
*Qatar agrees to evict Hamas leaders&lt;br /&gt;
*Hamas wants &amp;quot;immediate&amp;quot; end to war&lt;br /&gt;
*Taliban claims to want &amp;quot;new chapter&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*China wants &amp;quot;peaceful coexistence&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is &amp;quot;ready&amp;quot; to speak with the US&lt;br /&gt;
*EU wants to buy US gas, not Russian gas&lt;br /&gt;
*Ukraine leaders in talks with Trump/Elon&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_Effect&amp;diff=2084756</id>
		<title>Trump Effect</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_Effect&amp;diff=2084756"/>
		<updated>2024-11-09T19:40:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: &amp;quot;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''&amp;quot;Trump Effect&amp;quot;''' – 72 hours after winning the 2024 Election: [https://twitter.com/ByronDonalds/status/1855264141277073733?t=_nbq1I5aekqCWA8SsrAZjg&amp;amp;s=19]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;President-elect Donald Trump just won reelection on Tuesday and he won’t even be taking office until Jan. 20, 2025, But good things already seem to be happening, just with the knowledge he won.&amp;quot; [https://ground.news/article/trump-effect-qatar-reportedly-makes-huge-move-regarding-hamas-leaders?utm_source=mobile-app&amp;amp;utm_medium=newsroom-share]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stock market immediately soared, with the Dow topping 44,000 for the first time and the S&amp;amp;P 500 closing at a record high.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First female Chief of Staff appointed&lt;br /&gt;
*NYC to stop giving debit cards to illegals&lt;br /&gt;
*US companies bring production home&lt;br /&gt;
*Stock market hitting all-time-highs&lt;br /&gt;
*Bitcoin hitting all-time-highs&lt;br /&gt;
*Newest migrant caravan breaking-up&lt;br /&gt;
*Qatar agrees to evict Hamas leaders&lt;br /&gt;
*Hamas wants &amp;quot;immediate&amp;quot; end to war&lt;br /&gt;
*Taliban claims to want &amp;quot;new chapter&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*China wants &amp;quot;peaceful coexistence&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is &amp;quot;ready&amp;quot; to speak with the US&lt;br /&gt;
*EU wants to buy US gas, not Russian gas&lt;br /&gt;
*Ukraine leaders in talks with Trump/Elon&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_Effect&amp;diff=2084755</id>
		<title>Trump Effect</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Trump_Effect&amp;diff=2084755"/>
		<updated>2024-11-09T19:39:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Ed Poor: good things already seem to be happening, just with the knowledge he won&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''&amp;quot;Trump Effect&amp;quot;''' – 72 hours after winning the 2024 Election: [https://twitter.com/ByronDonalds/status/1855264141277073733?t=_nbq1I5aekqCWA8SsrAZjg&amp;amp;s=19]&lt;br /&gt;
President-elect Donald Trump just won reelection on Tuesday and he won’t even be taking office until Jan. 20, 2025, But good things already seem to be happening, just with the knowledge he won. [https://ground.news/article/trump-effect-qatar-reportedly-makes-huge-move-regarding-hamas-leaders?utm_source=mobile-app&amp;amp;utm_medium=newsroom-share]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stock market immediately soared, with the Dow topping 44,000 for the first time and the S&amp;amp;P 500 closing at a record high.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*First female Chief of Staff appointed&lt;br /&gt;
*NYC to stop giving debit cards to illegals&lt;br /&gt;
*US companies bring production home&lt;br /&gt;
*Stock market hitting all-time-highs&lt;br /&gt;
*Bitcoin hitting all-time-highs&lt;br /&gt;
*Newest migrant caravan breaking-up&lt;br /&gt;
*Qatar agrees to evict Hamas leaders&lt;br /&gt;
*Hamas wants &amp;quot;immediate&amp;quot; end to war&lt;br /&gt;
*Taliban claims to want &amp;quot;new chapter&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*China wants &amp;quot;peaceful coexistence&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Russia is &amp;quot;ready&amp;quot; to speak with the US&lt;br /&gt;
*EU wants to buy US gas, not Russian gas&lt;br /&gt;
*Ukraine leaders in talks with Trump/Elon&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ed Poor</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>