<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Dufrane</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Dufrane"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Dufrane"/>
	<updated>2026-10-11T14:48:03Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Biblical_scientific_foreknowledge&amp;diff=897329</id>
		<title>Biblical scientific foreknowledge</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Biblical_scientific_foreknowledge&amp;diff=897329"/>
		<updated>2011-08-04T17:28:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Newton.png|thumb|alt=scientific foreknowledge in the bible|250px|[[Isaac Newton]], cornerstone of the [[scientific revolution]], based his research on the scientific authority of the Bible and sought enlightenment in scripture.]]‎&lt;br /&gt;
'''Biblical scientific foreknowledge''' is how the [[Bible]] shows a comprehension of [[science|scientific]] knowledge far ahead of its time.  ''Biblical scientific foreknowledge illustrates what is possible.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bible denier]]s &amp;amp;#8212; such as [[atheist]]s and [[evolution]]ists &amp;amp;#8212; engage in [[liberal denial]] about the many truths in the Bible.  '''''Their irrational [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|closed-mindedness]] against the Bible obstructs the advancement of science'''''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Biblical scientific foreknowledge''' has another benefit: it facilitates improvements in the translation of verses that describe scientific-related events, such as [[Jesus]]'s [[Essay:Calming the Storm|Calming the Storm]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Geology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Flood===&lt;br /&gt;
Modern scientists long opposed a young earth [[creation|created]] by God and the suggestion that cataclysmic flooding, such as the [[Great Flood]] as described in the Bible, shaped the landscape. However, ample [[counterexamples to an old earth]] exist and the discovery in the Northwest of &amp;quot;giant ripple marks, 50 feet high and 200-500 feet apart&amp;quot; proved that a cataclysmic flood did indeed occur.  As a result, &amp;quot;[a]mong geologists, the concept of a catastrophic flood came to be accepted by the late 1950s.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iafi.org/floods.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Continental drift===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Continental drift]] was first proposed by a creationist in 1859 based on Genesis 1:9-10, which implies that all of dry land was in one place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c001.html#1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Atheists]] mocked the concept for about 100 years, until finally accepting its truth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Underwater springs ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only in moderns times have scientists become aware of enormous underwater springs feeding into the oceans, and the very deep valleys at the bottom of the oceans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Bible repeatedly describes this thousands of years earlier: &amp;quot;on that very day '''''the deep subcrustal springs were broken open''''', and the windows of the sky were thrown open.&amp;quot;  ([[Genesis_1-8_%28Translated%29#Chapter_7|Genesis 7:11 (CBP)]], emphasis added).  And again, in 2 Samuel 22:16, the Bible says, &amp;quot;And the channels of the sea appeared, the foundations of the world were discovered ....&amp;quot;  ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Agriculture ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, intellectuals insisted that the world's population would grow larger than the food supply, resulting in mass starvation.  Yet there are examples in both the Old and New Testaments of the food supply increasing to be more plentiful than expected.  Indeed, by 2011 obesity was far more prevalent and harmful than hunger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible describes a [[Great Flood]] occurring around 3300 B.C., or about 5300 years ago.  It involved a cataclysmic rainstorm of a magnitude never seen before or since.  For centuries atheists have denied its possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1991, an &amp;quot;ice mummy&amp;quot; was discovered: a remarkably preserved ancient body, including even the contents of his last meal, due to an extraordinary ice storm in the [[Alps]].  By scientific dating the occurrence of this massive ice storm in the mountains (and rainstorm below) was 5300 years ago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/icemummies/iceman.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Health, Biology and Medicine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Prohibition against Multi-Threaded clothes===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Deuteronomy 22:11, God explains that it is reprehensible to wear clothes made from wool and linen at the same time. Today, this knowledge preserves countless lives who would be otherwise imitating ancient idolators. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://jfb.biblecommenter.com/deuteronomy/22.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Eighth Day Blood Clotting Factors===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Genesis 17:12, God mandated that Abraham circumcise his sons on the 8th day after birth.  In 1935, it was discovered that Vitamin K, together with prothrombin, causes blood coagulation, (important in any surgical procedure).  On the 8th day, the amount of prothrombin present is elevated above 100% of normal and is therefore the only day in the male’s life in which this will be the case (normally). If surgery is to be performed, day 8 is the perfect day to do it as vitamin K and prothrombin levels are at their peak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lifespan===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible put the maximum lifespan for man at 120 years (Genesis 6:3), the typical lifespan at 70 years and the typical for a good-living person at 80 years (Psalm 90:10).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of years after that was written, despite immense advances in medicine and technology, these figures remain remarkably accurate.  The longest recorded life of a man is precisely 120 years (Shigechiyo Izumi), the average lifespan for a man is roughly 70 years, and the average for a good-living man is about 80 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jeanne Calment]] lived to age 122, only two years past 120. She was said to have never worked and used olive oil on her skin, outliving many of of her [[feminist]] counterparts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Oldest Human Ancestor===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible suggests that the oldest maternal ancestor -- [[Eve]] -- first lived slightly more than 6000 years ago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/ussher.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The mutation rate of [[mitochondria]] indicates roughly the same date for the oldest common human ancestor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationwiki.org/Mitochondrial_Eve_lived_only_6500_years_ago_%28Talk.Origins%29&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anesthesia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first operation described in the Bible was the removal of a rib from [[Adam]], which was performed by first putting Adam into an unconscious,  &amp;quot;deep sleep-like trance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Genesis 2:21]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This was the equivalent of anesthesia -- thousands of years before anesthesia was developed by William Mortan in 1846.  Had scientists and physicians been more [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openminded]] about Genesis 2:21, they may have discovered anesthesia far sooner, and saved many more lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bloodletting hastens death===&lt;br /&gt;
At the time of Jesus and for centuries afterward, arteries and veins were thought to be filled with air, and blood was viewed as something to be used up rather than recirculate.  Bloodletting -- the practice of intentionally draining blood from a patient -- was common medical practice through the time of [[George Washington]], hastening his death prematurely for reasons not understood until years later.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37212.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most victims of crucifixion in Roman times languished on the cross for days.  But the Bible describes how Pilate, who crucified many, was surprised at how quickly Jesus passed away.  2000 years later, scientific knowledge has advanced to understand that this was caused by his prior loss of blood during his scourging (being brutally whipped), a punishment typically given ''instead of'' crucifixion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homosexuality and disease===&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible's prohibition against [[homosexuality]] predated knowledge about the [[Homosexuality and Health|many diseases and disorders associated with homosexuality]], and thus showed scientific wisdom prescient for its time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Eyesight ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The description in the [[Mark 1-8 (Translated)|Gospel of Mark 8:24]] for the sensation when one's eyesight is restored includes his perception of &amp;quot;trees walking.&amp;quot; This perception was first confirmed nearly 2000 years later as physicians developed medical techniques for restoring eyesight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This newspaper account is not specific but describes the overall sensation of restored sight: [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-138886/Robot-eye-restore-lost-sight-20-years.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Maximum Human Height ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists thought the size of [[Goliath]] in the Bible to be absurdly large (over nine feet tall), until [[Robert Wadlow]] grew to nearly 9 feet tall and was still growing when he died at a young age in 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quarantining Against Leprosy Epidemics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although leprosy is not as contagious as other infectious diseases, and some forms of it (such as tuberculoid or paucibacillary form are not contagious), Leviticus 13 and 14 set forth rules to prevent epidemics of this disease among the people of Israel.  Western science did not catch up until, in 1663, such laws were introduced in America in an attempt to curb an outbreak of smallpox.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Centuries ahead of medical science, Jesus subsequently explained that leprosy was not as contagious as people thought.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hygiene ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Millennia before germ theory was proposed in the late 19th century, Leviticus 15 mandated hygiene laws that included bathing, washing of clothing, destruction of contaminated pottery and washing of hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Matthew 15:2, Jesus then curbed compulsive hand-washing by explaining why it n no longer typically necessary (in a non-farming, non-medical context) with respect to man's digestive system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digestive System ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was common thought throughout history that infections and illness resulted from the digestive system, based on unclean hands or food.  Jesus rejected that view, and declared hand-washing before meals to be typically unnecessary.  It took many centuries before science caught up to the Bible on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feasibility of [[Abiogenesis]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
Although scientists dismissed ideas involving [[Abiogenesis|abiogenesis]], or the process from which life emerges from nothing, as nothing more than archaic beliefs in [[spontaneous generation]], the Bible very clearly depicts an occurrence of this phenomenon, for beginning in Genesis 1:20, [[God]] creates life from nothing. It was not until the early 20th century that science finally began to accept the viability of abiogenesis, a view that the Bible had held for almost 2000 years, except that [[atheists]] falsely claim that abiogenesis is somehow possible without a creator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Awareness while Unborn  ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Abortion]] advocates argue that it is ok to terminate a baby while dismissing the pain inflicted by ending an innocent life. They argue that a fetus cannot feel pain because senses are incomplete. There is a heart-beating human in the womb that can feel even though still unborn and developing. In modern times, we now know the baby in the womb is alert, aware of their mother's emotions, recognizes voices, responds to stimuli and music. The Bible tells us the baby feels (1 Luke 44), ''&amp;quot;the babe leaps for joy in Elizabeth’s womb at the sound of Mary’s voice.&amp;quot;'' The inwomb developing baby, John the Baptist, notices the presence of the unborn [[Lord]] in [[Mary]], and is excited. In addition (St. Paul to the Galatians 1:15), ''&amp;quot;God… from my mother’s womb had set me apart and called me through his grace.&amp;quot;'' Paul's very first thought, feeling, awareness began while unborn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The significance of blood ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Old Testament teaches that the [[life]] of all flesh is its [[blood]] ({{Bible ref|book=Leviticus|chap=17|verses=13-14|version=KJV}}).  Secular science remained ignorant of the properties and circulation of blood until the 17th century A.D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Menstruation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Biblical laws concerning [[menstruation]], including the setting apart of the menstruating woman and the prohibition on intimacy during menstruation, address health concerns that were not known to secular science until the 20th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Neuburger, Max. History of Medicine. Oxford University Press, 1910, Vol. I, p. 38.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cosmology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===UFOs and Extraterrestrial Life===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most of the 20th century, scientists typically believed in the existence of extraterrestrial life, despite the lack of any reference to it in the [[Bible]].  After spending many billions of dollars looking for such life, and investigating countless reports of UFOs, no such life has been found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Number of Stars===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bible]] repeatedly refers to the number of stars as being innumerable,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Genesis 15:5, Jeremiah 33:22 and Hebrews 11:12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; despite scientists insisting throughout most of history that there were only about 6000 stars. In the early 17th century [[Galileo]] turned a telescope to the heavens and discovered a great number of stars that had been previously invisible to the naked eye.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://galileo.rice.edu/lib/student_work/astronomy95/orionpleiades.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not until the 20th century did scientists discover the tremendous number of stars:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/07/22/stars.survey/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are &amp;quot;10 times as many stars as grains of sand on all the world's beaches and deserts,&amp;quot; totaling &amp;quot;7 followed by 22 zeros or, more accurately, 70 sextillion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But even that scientific estimate was much too low.  On December 1, 2010, scientists admitted:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2010/1201/Universe-might-hold-three-times-more-stars-than-previously-thought&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;a cosmic embarrassment of riches – ''the universe appears to hold three times the number of stars many [[astronomer]]s might have estimated only a year ago''.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spherical Earth===&lt;br /&gt;
The Book of Isaiah establishes that the true shape of the earth is a sphere:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|He sits above the sphere of the earth, and its inhabitants look to him like grasshoppers.  He stretches out the galaxies like a curtain, spreading them out like a tent to live under: - [[Isaiah_34-42_(Translated)#Chapter_40|Isaiah 40:22 (CBP]])}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that Isaiah was written circa the 8th century BC, centuries before Greek philosophers, beginning with [[Pythagoras]], theorized the earth was round.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Earth free floating in space ===&lt;br /&gt;
The book of Job states that God &amp;quot;hangs the earth on nothing.&amp;quot; This presaged the fact that space is in fact empty, which wasn't known until the dawn of the 20th century, when ether theory was disproved.  It also contrasts with pagan mythologies such as [[Atlas]] holding up the earth or the earth being supported by a giant turtle, as in ancient Hindu and native American myths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Darkness, and Unexplained Ripples in Cosmic Background Radiation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Genesis Chapter 1]] explains that [[God]] created light first, rather than merely stars.  A &amp;quot;big bang&amp;quot; would result in light everywhere, without darkness, and without ripples in cosmic background radiation.  Yet in the 21st century ripples were discovered in cosmic background radiation, which can only be plausibly explained by recognizing that light was created first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Meteoroids ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Revelation of Saint John notes, &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood; And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed. Revelation 8:8-9 (KJV)}}&lt;br /&gt;
This accurately describes meteoroids, essentially large chunks of rock lit on fire by the shock of entering the earth's atmosphere.  They were not discovered until 1801, and their composition was not otherwise known until the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Stellar proper movement ===&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Job]], there is a list of challenges that are constructed in the form of questions, with the idea that man can't do it, but God can.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among those challenges, two are remarkable: one mentions the ''untying'' of Orion's belt, and the other is the ''binding'' of the Pleiades. One recently astronomers could measure the proper movement of those stars; Orion's belt is moving apart, with each star going in a different direction, while the Pleiades are moving together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Space flight ===&lt;br /&gt;
Many theorize that the book of [[Ezekiel]] contains descriptions of spaceships and rockets, as they would have been described by someone thousands of years ago. [http://www.spaceshipsofezekiel.com/ Author Blumrich] has even published an entire book about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Expanding universe===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bible]] explains, in 17 different verses, that [[God]] &amp;quot;stretched out&amp;quot; the heavens&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationists.org/God-streched-out-the-universe-bible-verses.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, in other words, expanding the fabric of space-time from a smaller size to a much larger one. Scientists have discovered only in the last 100 years that, by studying the red shift of galaxies, the universe indeed appears to have been &amp;quot;stretched out&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meteorology ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Existence of the [[Jet Stream]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
Ecclesiastes 1:6 notes, &amp;quot;The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits.&amp;quot;  This described the jet stream long before its 19th-20th century discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Water cycle ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The existence of the water cycle was not known until imperial Roman times, but the Bible described it over a thousand years before that!&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Ecclesiastes]] 11:3, [[Job]] 26:8 and [[Amos]] 9:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Physics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Light and Color ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to the work of [[Isaac Newton]], white was considered to be the fundamental color of light, and other colors (such as red, green and blue) were formed by adding to white light.  Under that traditional theory, the fullness of all light (a combination of all colors of light) would result in something other than pure white.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transfiguration of Jesus is described with remarkable consistency in all three synoptic [[Gospel]]s: in the fullness of light Jesus and his clothing display an intense white, whiter than any bleach could produce.  This illustrates what was not discovered and accepted until nearly 1700 years later: that white is the combination of other fundamental colors, and the purest white light is formed by a perfectly full combination (see [[Prism]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Action-at-a-distance ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus]] demonstrated [[action-at-a-distance]], as recounted in [[John 1-7 (Translated)|John 4:46-54]].  Scientists, particularly [[atheists]], denied the possibility of this phenomenon for thousands of years.  When Newton proposed action-at-a-distance as the basis of gravity, scientists continued to reject it, but eventually accepted it as being true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later the [[Theory of Relativity]] again denied the possibility of action-at-a-distance, but [[quantum mechanics]] subsequently proved that it does occur.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See also [[Counterexamples to Relativity]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quantum Mechanics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Observation of the Wave Function ====&lt;br /&gt;
The second chapter of the [[Gospel of John]] describes the conversion of water into wine by [[Jesus]] at a wedding reception. [[John_1-7_(Translated)#Chapter_2|John 2:9]] states: &amp;quot;When the host of the wedding feast tasted the water, it had been made into wine.&amp;quot; This passage implies that the drink was not wine until it had been tasted, or observed. Possibly, the drink was a superposition of the state of wine and the state of water until it was observed as wine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The miraculous [[Essay:Calming the Storm|calming of the storm]] is typically translated as the result of a &amp;quot;rebuke&amp;quot; by [[Jesus]] of the bad weather.  But a closer look at the Greek reveals that the key term means &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;rebuke&amp;quot;, and thus it was the act of Jesus observing the chaos that caused it to &amp;quot;collapse&amp;quot; into an orderly state, similar to the effect of observing a wave function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Matthew 16:19, Jesus draws a then-unusual distinction between what is fixed and what is uncertain by declaring, &amp;quot;Whatever you make binding on earth will be binding in heaven, and whatever you set loose on earth will be set loose in heaven.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Matthew_10-19_%28Translated%29&amp;amp;oldid=870778#Chapter_16&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This may describe the fundamental uncertainty that continues unless and until there is human observation that then causes the wave function to collapse into a particular (&amp;quot;bound&amp;quot;) state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [[Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle]] ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Old and New Testaments refer to a fundamental uncertainty that requires observation to resolve, akin to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle discovered in the 1920s:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The earth came to exist in an utterly formless and empty state.&amp;quot;  [[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Genesis 1:2]].&lt;br /&gt;
* The master refusing to order the removal of the weeds sowed among the wheat because of the uncertainty in distinguishing between the two until later: [[Matthew 10-19 (Translated)|Matthew 13:24-30]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Wave-Particle Duality ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Particles are subject to gravity; waves are not.  Wave-particle duality, first discovered in the 20th century, allows for a particle to sometimes be subject to gravity and sometimes not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wave-particle duality was described nearly 2000 years earlier in the Gospel account of Jesus walking on water: [[Mark 1-8 (Translated)|Mark 6:45-54]].  A close reading of the passage reveals the wave-like (or light-like) characteristic of the walking on water:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|he walked on the surface of the lake and came to the boat, ''nearly passing it''.  But when they saw him walking on water, they thought it must have been ''a ghost'', and cried out.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mark 1-8 (Translated)|Mark 6:48-49]] (italics added).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a more general sense, [[Jesus]] could be viewed as the &amp;quot;particle&amp;quot; and the [[Holy Spirit]] as the &amp;quot;wave&amp;quot; of [[God]].  A fuller understanding of the [[Trinity]] could have opened the eyes of scientists much earlier to the fundamental wave-particle duality of nature ... and still could.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Quantum tunneling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Quantum tunneling]] is the ability of particles to move through energy barriers even though ostensibly impossible based on classical laws of mechanical physics.  This was not discovered by scientists until the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus]] proved this was possible in [[John_15-21_(Translated)#Chapter_20|John 20:26]], when he appeared before the [[Apostles]] in a closed room with completely shut doors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Relativity ===&lt;br /&gt;
Romans 10:6-7: But the righteousness that is by faith says: &amp;quot;Do not say in your heart, 'Who will ascend into heaven?'&amp;quot; (that is, to bring Christ down) 7&amp;quot;or 'Who will descend into the deep?'&amp;quot; (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equating ascending into heaven to bringing Christ down is an example of the fact that there is no universal reference frame, and only relative speeds matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Modern Relativity ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Theory of Relativity]] denies the possibility of action-at-a-distance.  But several passages in the Bible, such as [[John 1-7 (Translated)|John 4:46-54]] and [[Matthew 20-28 (Translated)|Matthew 27:51]], describe simultaneous actions from afar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list of [[Counterexamples to Relativity]] has grown in recently, and modern experiments in [[quantum mechanics]] have confirmed action-at-a-distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Book of Genesis]] states that the darkness or chaos in the universe can never overcome the light, or order.  This same concept was not discovered in physics until the development of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which holds that heat (or order or light) always travels in the direction of cold (or disorder or darkness), and never in the opposite direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The nature of air ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until about 300 years ago, common knowledge believe that the air was &amp;quot;empty&amp;quot; and didn't weigh anything. But [[Job]] 28:25 says &amp;quot;To establish a '''weight''' for the wind, And apportion the waters by measure&amp;quot; indicating that the divinely inspired author knew the air had substance and weight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mathematics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [[Banach-Tarski Paradox]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
The only miracle described in all four [[Gospels]] is the multiplication of loaves and fish by [[Jesus]], thought for thousands of years to be a mathematical and physical impossibility.  But the 20th century discovery of the so-called [[Banach-Tarski Paradox]] proved a mathematical basis for creating identical copies of an object.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Axiomatization of Arithmetic ===&lt;br /&gt;
The full set of axioms for integer arithmetic may be found in the Bible, as demonstrated by J.C. Keister.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.trinityfoundation.org/PDF/027a-MathandtheBible.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  For example, [[Luke 9-16 (Translated)|Luke 12:52]] is a striking statement of the commutative law for addition: &amp;quot;For from this point forward there will be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.&amp;quot;  This understanding presaged both later attempts at the axiomatization of arithmetic by Peano and the development of [[abstract algebra]] in the 19th and 20th centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Zoology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inability of Animals to Understand Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Genesis 3:1-10]] explains that only humans understand good and evil, and clothe themselves because of it.  Repeatedly scientists have attempted to demonstrate that animals can understand morality also, but every attempt has failed.  Despite denial by [[evolutionists]], no animal (other than humans) has ever been found that clothes itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Existence of dinosaurs===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dinosaur]] fossils were not discovered until the 19th century, but the book of [[Job]] describes enormous creatures called behemoth and leviathan, the descriptions being similar to dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures.  It may also have referred to another similarly giant now-extinct species.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i2/behemoth.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lions' killing methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until the 1970s naturalists believed that lions killed their prey by biting through the neck or by breaking the neck with a swat of a paw, while the Bible says that lions strangled their prey. (Nahum 2:12) It was not until the 1970s that it was discovered that the [[Bible]] was correct.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ed5015.tripod.com/BLions87.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Giant sea creatures and Jonah ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Jonah (Translated)|Book of Jonah]] describes his survival in the belly of a giant sea creature for 2.5 to 3 days.  Scientists declared this to be impossible due to powerful stomach acids that quickly break down any material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then, in 2010, scientists were astonished to find the following materials intact in the belly of a gray whale that had died after being stranded on a Northwest beach:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/04/19/pair-sweat-pants-garbage-beached-whales-stomach/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*a pair of sweat pants &lt;br /&gt;
*a golf ball&lt;br /&gt;
*over 20 plastic bags&lt;br /&gt;
*small towels&lt;br /&gt;
*duct tape&lt;br /&gt;
*surgical gloves&lt;br /&gt;
*a functioning laptop accessing ''Conservapedia'' (just kidding about this last item)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, many sea creatures have gone extinct in the thousands of years since Jonah lived.&lt;br /&gt;
===Worker ants===&lt;br /&gt;
Proverbs 6:6-8 correctly states the sex of worker [[ant]]s (female), using the correct one of the two [[Grammar#Gender|grammatical genders]] available in Biblical [[Hebrew]].  Secular entomologists would not discover that fact until the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=rzwSAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA6&amp;amp;dq=ant+undeveloped+female+worker+date:1700-1850&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false The study of medicine, Volume 5 By John Mason Good]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Linguistics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Common Descent?===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[theory of evolution]] suggests that all languages are descended from a common ancestral language, and for a century (1860 to about 1960) scientists clung to that view.  But now most linguists identify many different families of languages that have no common ancestor, just as described in Genesis 11 with the [[Tower of Babel]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Earliest Hebrew Writings===&lt;br /&gt;
Skeptics have claimed that [[Hebrew]] writing did not exist before the 6th century B.C.  But a recent Israeli archaeological dig dated four centuries earlier, in the 10th century B.C., included an artifact found at Khirbet Qeiyafa in the Elah Valley.  This artifact contained a written inscription in Hebrew relating to &amp;quot;slaves, widows and orphans.&amp;quot; Haifa University Professor Gershon Galil noted that this disproves the theory that the Bible could not have been written before the 6th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2010/01/08/Bible-may-be-centuries-older-than-thought/UPI-21171262997765/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus stated that there will always be poverty,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Mark 14:7, Matthew 26:11 and John 12.8.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet [[liberals]] repeatedly insist that poverty can be eliminated with more government spending.  Every attempt to eliminate poverty has failed just as Jesus predicted. In 1991 [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] in [[Economics]] for the [[Coase Theorem]], which implies that government attempts to reduced poverty will interfere with efficient operation of the economy, and thereby reduce wealth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Engineering examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biblical scientific foreknowledge about these engineering developments has been proposed:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2191&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|automobiles (Joel 2:3-4); airplanes (Isaiah 31:5, also 40:31); submarines (Revelation 9:1-11); radio (Ecclesiastes 10:20); and television (Revelation 11:3-12)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Classical photography, using negative imaging, was predated by the [[Shroud of Turin]] with respect to the imaging on the Shroud likely due to the light of the [[Resurrection]]. The Shroud ([[Greek]]: σινδών - sindón)  is mentioned in three Gospels: Matthew 27:59, Mark 15:46, Luke 23:53, while John 20:5-7 talks about a face cloth or napkin ([[Greek]]: σουδάριον - soudárion) - perhaps the [[Sudarium of Oviedo]] - and stripes of linen ([[Greek]]: ὀθόνιον - othonion). The description by the eyewitness John implies that his sighting of the Shroud may have confirmed his [[faith]], though he doesn't mention its photograph-like image &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;How is it possible that those sacred historians, who carefully related all the miracles that took place at Christ's death, should have omitted to mention one so remarkable as the likeness of the body of our Lord remaining on its wrapping sheet? This fact undoubtedly deserved to be recorded. St John, in his Gospel, relates even how St Peter, having entered the sepulchre, saw the linen clothes lying on one side, and the napkin that was about his head on the other; but he does not say that there was a miraculous impression of our Lord's figure upon these clothes, and it is not to be imagined that he would have omitted to mention such a work of God if there had been any thing of this kind.&amp;quot;'', [[John Calvin]]: ''Traité des Reliques'', Geneve 1543, translated by '''Valerian Krasinski''': ''A treatise on Relics'', Edingburgh 1854&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alleged absurdities and contradictions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biblical scientific foreknowledge is an underpinning of creation science, and is widely credited by Christian scientists and apologists, including the organizations [[Creation Ministries International]], [[Answers in Genesis]],  and [[CreationWiki]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationwiki.org/index.php/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creationwiki.org/index.php/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge  Bible Scientific Foreknowledge]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1718/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i1/medicine.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists unsuccessfully attempt to discredit the Bible based on science.  Here are some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bat as a bird ===&lt;br /&gt;
A favorite evolutionist canard is that Leviticus 11:13-19 labels the [[bat]], a [[mammal]], as a [[bird]].  But this is an obvious failure of translation, as the Hebrew term '' 'owph'' did not entail the &amp;quot;clade&amp;quot; of birds, but was a non-biological category referring to any winged creature, mammalian, avian, or insect.  The KJV translation as &amp;quot;fowl&amp;quot; is simply incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Incorrect value of Pi ===&lt;br /&gt;
Two sections of the bible (1 Kings 7, 23-26, 2 Chronicles, 4, 2-5) appear to indicate that the correct value of [[Pi]] is 3, whereas Pi is in fact an irrational number, equalling approximately 3.14159. It has alleged by atheists, including [[Sam Harris]] and [[Richard Dawkins]], that this value indicates the fallacious nature of scripture.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Richard Dawkins Foundation, ''Reply to a Christian'', Sam Harris - [http://richarddawkins.net/articles/139]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, a simple explanation of the claimed &amp;quot;contradiction&amp;quot; is that the Bible records the ratio of the actual object which Hiram created, not that of a mathematical [[sphere]]. The claim that it was round all about does not equate to a claim that it was a perfect sphere, as atheists have claimed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Theology'', Volume 59, Issues 427-438,  Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge (Great Britain), London, 1956, p. 23 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, [[Pi]], when expressed as one significant digit, is equal to 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Creation vs. Evolution Videos]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.creationwiki.org/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge Bible scientific foreknowledge] by [[CreationWiki]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Creation vs. evolution}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Creationism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Biblical_scientific_foreknowledge&amp;diff=897326</id>
		<title>Biblical scientific foreknowledge</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Biblical_scientific_foreknowledge&amp;diff=897326"/>
		<updated>2011-08-04T17:06:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Newton.png|thumb|alt=scientific foreknowledge in the bible|250px|[[Isaac Newton]], cornerstone of the [[scientific revolution]], based his research on the scientific authority of the Bible and sought enlightenment in scripture.]]‎&lt;br /&gt;
'''Biblical scientific foreknowledge''' is how the [[Bible]] shows a comprehension of [[science|scientific]] knowledge far ahead of its time.  ''Biblical scientific foreknowledge illustrates what is possible.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bible denier]]s &amp;amp;#8212; such as [[atheist]]s and [[evolution]]ists &amp;amp;#8212; engage in [[liberal denial]] about the many truths in the Bible.  '''''Their irrational [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|closed-mindedness]] against the Bible obstructs the advancement of science'''''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Biblical scientific foreknowledge''' has another benefit: it facilitates improvements in the translation of verses that describe scientific-related events, such as [[Jesus]]'s [[Essay:Calming the Storm|Calming the Storm]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Geology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Flood===&lt;br /&gt;
Modern scientists long opposed a young earth [[creation|created]] by God and the suggestion that cataclysmic flooding, such as the [[Great Flood]] as described in the Bible, shaped the landscape. However, ample [[counterexamples to an old earth]] exist and the discovery in the Northwest of &amp;quot;giant ripple marks, 50 feet high and 200-500 feet apart&amp;quot; proved that a cataclysmic flood did indeed occur.  As a result, &amp;quot;[a]mong geologists, the concept of a catastrophic flood came to be accepted by the late 1950s.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.iafi.org/floods.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Continental drift===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Continental drift]] was first proposed by a creationist in 1859 based on Genesis 1:9-10, which implies that all of dry land was in one place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c001.html#1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Atheists]] mocked the concept for about 100 years, until finally accepting its truth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Underwater springs ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only in moderns times have scientists become aware of enormous underwater springs feeding into the oceans, and the very deep valleys at the bottom of the oceans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the Bible repeatedly describes this thousands of years earlier: &amp;quot;on that very day '''''the deep subcrustal springs were broken open''''', and the windows of the sky were thrown open.&amp;quot;  ([[Genesis_1-8_%28Translated%29#Chapter_7|Genesis 7:11 (CBP)]], emphasis added).  And again, in 2 Samuel 22:16, the Bible says, &amp;quot;And the channels of the sea appeared, the foundations of the world were discovered ....&amp;quot;  ([[KJV]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Agriculture ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late 1960s and early 1970s, intellectuals insisted that the world's population would grow larger than the food supply, resulting in mass starvation.  Yet there are examples in both the Old and New Testaments of the food supply increasing to be more plentiful than expected.  Indeed, by 2011 obesity was far more prevalent and harmful than hunger.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible describes a [[Great Flood]] occurring around 3300 B.C., or about 5300 years ago.  It involved a cataclysmic rainstorm of a magnitude never seen before or since.  For centuries atheists have denied its possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1991, an &amp;quot;ice mummy&amp;quot; was discovered: a remarkably preserved ancient body, including even the contents of his last meal, due to an extraordinary ice storm in the [[Alps]].  By scientific dating the occurrence of this massive ice storm in the mountains (and rainstorm below) was 5300 years ago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/icemummies/iceman.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Health, Biology and Medicine==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Eighth Day Blood Clotting Factors===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Genesis 17:12, God mandated that Abraham circumcise his sons on the 8th day after birth.  In 1935, it was discovered that Vitamin K, together with prothrombin, causes blood coagulation, (important in any surgical procedure).  On the 8th day, the amount of prothrombin present is elevated above 100% of normal and is therefore the only day in the male’s life in which this will be the case (normally). If surgery is to be performed, day 8 is the perfect day to do it as vitamin K and prothrombin levels are at their peak.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lifespan===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible put the maximum lifespan for man at 120 years (Genesis 6:3), the typical lifespan at 70 years and the typical for a good-living person at 80 years (Psalm 90:10). On the other hand, however, Methuselah lived nearly 1,000 years. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Methuselah dying before the flood is based on the Masoretic Text of Genesis 5 and his dying after the flood based on the Genesis 5 numbers in the Lucianic Septuagint (Codex Vaticanus).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thousands of years after that was written, despite immense advances in medicine and technology, these figures remain remarkably accurate.  The longest recorded life of a man is precisely 120 years (Shigechiyo Izumi), the average lifespan for a man is roughly 70 years, and the average for a good-living man is about 80 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jeanne Calment]] lived to age 122, only two years past 120. She was said to have never worked and used olive oil on her skin, outliving many of of her [[feminist]] counterparts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Oldest Human Ancestor===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible suggests that the oldest maternal ancestor -- [[Eve]] -- first lived slightly more than 6000 years ago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/scopes/ussher.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The mutation rate of [[mitochondria]] indicates roughly the same date for the oldest common human ancestor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationwiki.org/Mitochondrial_Eve_lived_only_6500_years_ago_%28Talk.Origins%29&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anesthesia===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first operation described in the Bible was the removal of a rib from [[Adam]], which was performed by first putting Adam into an unconscious,  &amp;quot;deep sleep-like trance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Genesis 2:21]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This was the equivalent of anesthesia -- thousands of years before anesthesia was developed by William Mortan in 1846.  Had scientists and physicians been more [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openminded]] about Genesis 2:21, they may have discovered anesthesia far sooner, and saved many more lives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bloodletting hastens death===&lt;br /&gt;
At the time of Jesus and for centuries afterward, arteries and veins were thought to be filled with air, and blood was viewed as something to be used up rather than recirculate.  Bloodletting -- the practice of intentionally draining blood from a patient -- was common medical practice through the time of [[George Washington]], hastening his death prematurely for reasons not understood until years later.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/37212.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most victims of crucifixion in Roman times languished on the cross for days.  But the Bible describes how Pilate, who crucified many, was surprised at how quickly Jesus passed away.  2000 years later, scientific knowledge has advanced to understand that this was caused by his prior loss of blood during his scourging (being brutally whipped), a punishment typically given ''instead of'' crucifixion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Homosexuality and disease===&lt;br /&gt;
The Bible's prohibition against [[homosexuality]] predated knowledge about the [[Homosexuality and Health|many diseases and disorders associated with homosexuality]], and thus showed scientific wisdom prescient for its time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Eyesight ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The description in the [[Mark 1-8 (Translated)|Gospel of Mark 8:24]] for the sensation when one's eyesight is restored includes his perception of &amp;quot;trees walking.&amp;quot; This perception was first confirmed nearly 2000 years later as physicians developed medical techniques for restoring eyesight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This newspaper account is not specific but describes the overall sensation of restored sight: [http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-138886/Robot-eye-restore-lost-sight-20-years.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Maximum Human Height ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists thought the size of [[Goliath]] in the Bible to be absurdly large (over nine feet tall), until [[Robert Wadlow]] grew to nearly 9 feet tall and was still growing when he died at a young age in 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quarantining Against Leprosy Epidemics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although leprosy is not as contagious as other infectious diseases, and some forms of it (such as tuberculoid or paucibacillary form are not contagious), Leviticus 13 and 14 set forth rules to prevent epidemics of this disease among the people of Israel.  Western science did not catch up until, in 1663, such laws were introduced in America in an attempt to curb an outbreak of smallpox.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Centuries ahead of medical science, Jesus subsequently explained that leprosy was not as contagious as people thought.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hygiene ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Millennia before germ theory was proposed in the late 19th century, Leviticus 15 mandated hygiene laws that included bathing, washing of clothing, destruction of contaminated pottery and washing of hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Matthew 15:2, Jesus then curbed compulsive hand-washing by explaining why it n no longer typically necessary (in a non-farming, non-medical context) with respect to man's digestive system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Digestive System ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was common thought throughout history that infections and illness resulted from the digestive system, based on unclean hands or food.  Jesus rejected that view, and declared hand-washing before meals to be typically unnecessary.  It took many centuries before science caught up to the Bible on this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feasibility of [[Abiogenesis]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
Although scientists dismissed ideas involving [[Abiogenesis|abiogenesis]], or the process from which life emerges from nothing, as nothing more than archaic beliefs in [[spontaneous generation]], the Bible very clearly depicts an occurrence of this phenomenon, for beginning in Genesis 1:20, [[God]] creates life from nothing. It was not until the early 20th century that science finally began to accept the viability of abiogenesis, a view that the Bible had held for almost 2000 years, except that [[atheists]] falsely claim that abiogenesis is somehow possible without a creator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Awareness while Unborn  ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Abortion]] advocates argue that it is ok to terminate a baby while dismissing the pain inflicted by ending an innocent life. They argue that a fetus cannot feel pain because senses are incomplete. There is a heart-beating human in the womb that can feel even though still unborn and developing. In modern times, we now know the baby in the womb is alert, aware of their mother's emotions, recognizes voices, responds to stimuli and music. The Bible tells us the baby feels (1 Luke 44), ''&amp;quot;the babe leaps for joy in Elizabeth’s womb at the sound of Mary’s voice.&amp;quot;'' The inwomb developing baby, John the Baptist, notices the presence of the unborn [[Lord]] in [[Mary]], and is excited. In addition (St. Paul to the Galatians 1:15), ''&amp;quot;God… from my mother’s womb had set me apart and called me through his grace.&amp;quot;'' Paul's very first thought, feeling, awareness began while unborn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The significance of blood ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Old Testament teaches that the [[life]] of all flesh is its [[blood]] ({{Bible ref|book=Leviticus|chap=17|verses=13-14|version=KJV}}).  Secular science remained ignorant of the properties and circulation of blood until the 17th century A.D.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Menstruation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Biblical laws concerning [[menstruation]], including the setting apart of the menstruating woman and the prohibition on intimacy during menstruation, address health concerns that were not known to secular science until the 20th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Neuburger, Max. History of Medicine. Oxford University Press, 1910, Vol. I, p. 38.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cosmology==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===UFOs and Extraterrestrial Life===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For most of the 20th century, scientists typically believed in the existence of extraterrestrial life, despite the lack of any reference to it in the [[Bible]].  After spending many billions of dollars looking for such life, and investigating countless reports of UFOs, no such life has been found.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Number of Stars===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bible]] repeatedly refers to the number of stars as being innumerable,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Genesis 15:5, Jeremiah 33:22 and Hebrews 11:12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; despite scientists insisting throughout most of history that there were only about 6000 stars. In the early 17th century [[Galileo]] turned a telescope to the heavens and discovered a great number of stars that had been previously invisible to the naked eye.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://galileo.rice.edu/lib/student_work/astronomy95/orionpleiades.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not until the 20th century did scientists discover the tremendous number of stars:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/space/07/22/stars.survey/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:There are &amp;quot;10 times as many stars as grains of sand on all the world's beaches and deserts,&amp;quot; totaling &amp;quot;7 followed by 22 zeros or, more accurately, 70 sextillion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But even that scientific estimate was much too low.  On December 1, 2010, scientists admitted:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2010/1201/Universe-might-hold-three-times-more-stars-than-previously-thought&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;a cosmic embarrassment of riches – ''the universe appears to hold three times the number of stars many [[astronomer]]s might have estimated only a year ago''.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Spherical Earth===&lt;br /&gt;
The Book of Isaiah establishes that the true shape of the earth is a sphere:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|He sits above the sphere of the earth, and its inhabitants look to him like grasshoppers.  He stretches out the galaxies like a curtain, spreading them out like a tent to live under: - [[Isaiah_34-42_(Translated)#Chapter_40|Isaiah 40:22 (CBP]])}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that Isaiah was written circa the 8th century BC, centuries before Greek philosophers, beginning with [[Pythagoras]], theorized the earth was round.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Earth free floating in space ===&lt;br /&gt;
The book of Job states that God &amp;quot;hangs the earth on nothing.&amp;quot; This presaged the fact that space is in fact empty, which wasn't known until the dawn of the 20th century, when ether theory was disproved.  It also contrasts with pagan mythologies such as [[Atlas]] holding up the earth or the earth being supported by a giant turtle, as in ancient Hindu and native American myths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Darkness, and Unexplained Ripples in Cosmic Background Radiation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Genesis Chapter 1]] explains that [[God]] created light first, rather than merely stars.  A &amp;quot;big bang&amp;quot; would result in light everywhere, without darkness, and without ripples in cosmic background radiation.  Yet in the 21st century ripples were discovered in cosmic background radiation, which can only be plausibly explained by recognizing that light was created first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Meteoroids ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Revelation of Saint John notes, &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|And the second angel sounded, and as it were a great mountain burning with fire was cast into the sea: and the third part of the sea became blood; And the third part of the creatures which were in the sea, and had life, died; and the third part of the ships were destroyed. Revelation 8:8-9 (KJV)}}&lt;br /&gt;
This accurately describes meteoroids, essentially large chunks of rock lit on fire by the shock of entering the earth's atmosphere.  They were not discovered until 1801, and their composition was not otherwise known until the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Stellar proper movement ===&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Job]], there is a list of challenges that are constructed in the form of questions, with the idea that man can't do it, but God can.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Among those challenges, two are remarkable: one mentions the ''untying'' of Orion's belt, and the other is the ''binding'' of the Pleiades. One recently astronomers could measure the proper movement of those stars; Orion's belt is moving apart, with each star going in a different direction, while the Pleiades are moving together.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Space flight ===&lt;br /&gt;
Many theorize that the book of [[Ezekiel]] contains descriptions of spaceships and rockets, as they would have been described by someone thousands of years ago. [http://www.spaceshipsofezekiel.com/ Author Blumrich] has even published an entire book about this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Expanding universe===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Bible]] explains, in 17 different verses, that [[God]] &amp;quot;stretched out&amp;quot; the heavens&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creationists.org/God-streched-out-the-universe-bible-verses.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, in other words, expanding the fabric of space-time from a smaller size to a much larger one. Scientists have discovered only in the last 100 years that, by studying the red shift of galaxies, the universe indeed appears to have been &amp;quot;stretched out&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Meteorology ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Existence of the [[Jet Stream]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
Ecclesiastes 1:6 notes, &amp;quot;The wind goeth toward the south, and turneth about unto the north; it whirleth about continually, and the wind returneth again according to his circuits.&amp;quot;  This described the jet stream long before its 19th-20th century discovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Water cycle ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The existence of the water cycle was not known until imperial Roman times, but the Bible described it over a thousand years before that!&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Ecclesiastes]] 11:3, [[Job]] 26:8 and [[Amos]] 9:6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Physics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Light and Color ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to the work of [[Isaac Newton]], white was considered to be the fundamental color of light, and other colors (such as red, green and blue) were formed by adding to white light.  Under that traditional theory, the fullness of all light (a combination of all colors of light) would result in something other than pure white.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transfiguration of Jesus is described with remarkable consistency in all three synoptic [[Gospel]]s: in the fullness of light Jesus and his clothing display an intense white, whiter than any bleach could produce.  This illustrates what was not discovered and accepted until nearly 1700 years later: that white is the combination of other fundamental colors, and the purest white light is formed by a perfectly full combination (see [[Prism]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Action-at-a-distance ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus]] demonstrated [[action-at-a-distance]], as recounted in [[John 1-7 (Translated)|John 4:46-54]].  Scientists, particularly [[atheists]], denied the possibility of this phenomenon for thousands of years.  When Newton proposed action-at-a-distance as the basis of gravity, scientists continued to reject it, but eventually accepted it as being true.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later the [[Theory of Relativity]] again denied the possibility of action-at-a-distance, but [[quantum mechanics]] subsequently proved that it does occur.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See also [[Counterexamples to Relativity]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quantum Mechanics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Observation of the Wave Function ====&lt;br /&gt;
The second chapter of the [[Gospel of John]] describes the conversion of water into wine by [[Jesus]] at a wedding reception. [[John_1-7_(Translated)#Chapter_2|John 2:9]] states: &amp;quot;When the host of the wedding feast tasted the water, it had been made into wine.&amp;quot; This passage implies that the drink was not wine until it had been tasted, or observed. Possibly, the drink was a superposition of the state of wine and the state of water until it was observed as wine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The miraculous [[Essay:Calming the Storm|calming of the storm]] is typically translated as the result of a &amp;quot;rebuke&amp;quot; by [[Jesus]] of the bad weather.  But a closer look at the Greek reveals that the key term means &amp;quot;judge&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;rebuke&amp;quot;, and thus it was the act of Jesus observing the chaos that caused it to &amp;quot;collapse&amp;quot; into an orderly state, similar to the effect of observing a wave function.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Matthew 16:19, Jesus draws a then-unusual distinction between what is fixed and what is uncertain by declaring, &amp;quot;Whatever you make binding on earth will be binding in heaven, and whatever you set loose on earth will be set loose in heaven.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Matthew_10-19_%28Translated%29&amp;amp;oldid=870778#Chapter_16&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This may describe the fundamental uncertainty that continues unless and until there is human observation that then causes the wave function to collapse into a particular (&amp;quot;bound&amp;quot;) state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== [[Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle]] ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both the Old and New Testaments refer to a fundamental uncertainty that requires observation to resolve, akin to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle discovered in the 1920s:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The earth came to exist in an utterly formless and empty state.&amp;quot;  [[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Genesis 1:2]].&lt;br /&gt;
* The master refusing to order the removal of the weeds sowed among the wheat because of the uncertainty in distinguishing between the two until later: [[Matthew 10-19 (Translated)|Matthew 13:24-30]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Wave-Particle Duality ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Particles are subject to gravity; waves are not.  Wave-particle duality, first discovered in the 20th century, allows for a particle to sometimes be subject to gravity and sometimes not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The wave-particle duality was described nearly 2000 years earlier in the Gospel account of Jesus walking on water: [[Mark 1-8 (Translated)|Mark 6:45-54]].  A close reading of the passage reveals the wave-like (or light-like) characteristic of the walking on water:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|he walked on the surface of the lake and came to the boat, ''nearly passing it''.  But when they saw him walking on water, they thought it must have been ''a ghost'', and cried out.}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mark 1-8 (Translated)|Mark 6:48-49]] (italics added).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a more general sense, [[Jesus]] could be viewed as the &amp;quot;particle&amp;quot; and the [[Holy Spirit]] as the &amp;quot;wave&amp;quot; of [[God]].  A fuller understanding of the [[Trinity]] could have opened the eyes of scientists much earlier to the fundamental wave-particle duality of nature ... and still could.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Quantum tunneling ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Quantum tunneling]] is the ability of particles to move through energy barriers even though ostensibly impossible based on classical laws of mechanical physics.  This was not discovered by scientists until the 20th century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jesus]] proved this was possible in [[John_15-21_(Translated)#Chapter_20|John 20:26]], when he appeared before the [[Apostles]] in a closed room with completely shut doors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Classical Relativity ===&lt;br /&gt;
Romans 10:6-7: But the righteousness that is by faith says: &amp;quot;Do not say in your heart, 'Who will ascend into heaven?'&amp;quot; (that is, to bring Christ down) 7&amp;quot;or 'Who will descend into the deep?'&amp;quot; (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equating ascending into heaven to bringing Christ down is an example of the fact that there is no universal reference frame, and only relative speeds matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Modern Relativity ===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Theory of Relativity]] denies the possibility of action-at-a-distance.  But several passages in the Bible, such as [[John 1-7 (Translated)|John 4:46-54]] and [[Matthew 20-28 (Translated)|Matthew 27:51]], describe simultaneous actions from afar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The list of [[Counterexamples to Relativity]] has grown in recently, and modern experiments in [[quantum mechanics]] have confirmed action-at-a-distance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [[Second Law of Thermodynamics]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Book of Genesis]] states that the darkness or chaos in the universe can never overcome the light, or order.  This same concept was not discovered in physics until the development of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which holds that heat (or order or light) always travels in the direction of cold (or disorder or darkness), and never in the opposite direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The nature of air ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until about 300 years ago, common knowledge believe that the air was &amp;quot;empty&amp;quot; and didn't weigh anything. But [[Job]] 28:25 says &amp;quot;To establish a '''weight''' for the wind, And apportion the waters by measure&amp;quot; indicating that the divinely inspired author knew the air had substance and weight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mathematics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== [[Banach-Tarski Paradox]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
The only miracle described in all four [[Gospels]] is the multiplication of loaves and fish by [[Jesus]], thought for thousands of years to be a mathematical and physical impossibility.  But the 20th century discovery of the so-called [[Banach-Tarski Paradox]] proved a mathematical basis for creating identical copies of an object.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Axiomatization of Arithmetic ===&lt;br /&gt;
The full set of axioms for integer arithmetic may be found in the Bible, as demonstrated by J.C. Keister.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.trinityfoundation.org/PDF/027a-MathandtheBible.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  For example, [[Luke 9-16 (Translated)|Luke 12:52]] is a striking statement of the commutative law for addition: &amp;quot;For from this point forward there will be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three.&amp;quot;  This understanding presaged both later attempts at the axiomatization of arithmetic by Peano and the development of [[abstract algebra]] in the 19th and 20th centuries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Zoology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inability of Animals to Understand Morality===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Genesis 1-8 (Translated)|Genesis 3:1-10]] explains that only humans understand good and evil, and clothe themselves because of it.  Repeatedly scientists have attempted to demonstrate that animals can understand morality also, but every attempt has failed.  Despite denial by [[evolutionists]], no animal (other than humans) has ever been found that clothes itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Existence of dinosaurs===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dinosaur]] fossils were not discovered until the 19th century, but the book of [[Job]] describes enormous creatures called behemoth and leviathan, the descriptions being similar to dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures.  It may also have referred to another similarly giant now-extinct species.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/tj/v15/i2/behemoth.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lions' killing methods===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until the 1970s naturalists believed that lions killed their prey by biting through the neck or by breaking the neck with a swat of a paw, while the Bible says that lions strangled their prey. (Nahum 2:12) It was not until the 1970s that it was discovered that the [[Bible]] was correct.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ed5015.tripod.com/BLions87.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Giant sea creatures and Jonah ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Jonah (Translated)|Book of Jonah]] describes his survival in the belly of a giant sea creature for 2.5 to 3 days.  Scientists declared this to be impossible due to powerful stomach acids that quickly break down any material.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then, in 2010, scientists were astonished to find the following materials intact in the belly of a gray whale that had died after being stranded on a Northwest beach:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/04/19/pair-sweat-pants-garbage-beached-whales-stomach/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*a pair of sweat pants &lt;br /&gt;
*a golf ball&lt;br /&gt;
*over 20 plastic bags&lt;br /&gt;
*small towels&lt;br /&gt;
*duct tape&lt;br /&gt;
*surgical gloves&lt;br /&gt;
*a functioning laptop accessing ''Conservapedia'' (just kidding about this last item)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, many sea creatures have gone extinct in the thousands of years since Jonah lived.&lt;br /&gt;
===Worker ants===&lt;br /&gt;
Proverbs 6:6-8 correctly states the sex of worker [[ant]]s (female), using the correct one of the two [[Grammar#Gender|grammatical genders]] available in Biblical [[Hebrew]].  Secular entomologists would not discover that fact until the 19th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=rzwSAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA6&amp;amp;dq=ant+undeveloped+female+worker+date:1700-1850&amp;amp;lr=&amp;amp;as_brr=0&amp;amp;as_pt=ALLTYPES#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false The study of medicine, Volume 5 By John Mason Good]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Linguistics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Common Descent?===&lt;br /&gt;
The [[theory of evolution]] suggests that all languages are descended from a common ancestral language, and for a century (1860 to about 1960) scientists clung to that view.  But now most linguists identify many different families of languages that have no common ancestor, just as described in Genesis 11 with the [[Tower of Babel]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Earliest Hebrew Writings===&lt;br /&gt;
Skeptics have claimed that [[Hebrew]] writing did not exist before the 6th century B.C.  But a recent Israeli archaeological dig dated four centuries earlier, in the 10th century B.C., included an artifact found at Khirbet Qeiyafa in the Elah Valley.  This artifact contained a written inscription in Hebrew relating to &amp;quot;slaves, widows and orphans.&amp;quot; Haifa University Professor Gershon Galil noted that this disproves the theory that the Bible could not have been written before the 6th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2010/01/08/Bible-may-be-centuries-older-than-thought/UPI-21171262997765/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economics ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jesus stated that there will always be poverty,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Mark 14:7, Matthew 26:11 and John 12.8.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet [[liberals]] repeatedly insist that poverty can be eliminated with more government spending.  Every attempt to eliminate poverty has failed just as Jesus predicted. In 1991 [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] in [[Economics]] for the [[Coase Theorem]], which implies that government attempts to reduced poverty will interfere with efficient operation of the economy, and thereby reduce wealth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Engineering examples==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biblical scientific foreknowledge about these engineering developments has been proposed:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2191&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|automobiles (Joel 2:3-4); airplanes (Isaiah 31:5, also 40:31); submarines (Revelation 9:1-11); radio (Ecclesiastes 10:20); and television (Revelation 11:3-12)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Classical photography, using negative imaging, was predated by the [[Shroud of Turin]] with respect to the imaging on the Shroud likely due to the light of the [[Resurrection]]. The Shroud ([[Greek]]: σινδών - sindón)  is mentioned in three Gospels: Matthew 27:59, Mark 15:46, Luke 23:53, while John 20:5-7 talks about a face cloth or napkin ([[Greek]]: σουδάριον - soudárion) - perhaps the [[Sudarium of Oviedo]] - and stripes of linen ([[Greek]]: ὀθόνιον - othonion). The description by the eyewitness John implies that his sighting of the Shroud may have confirmed his [[faith]], though he doesn't mention its photograph-like image &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''&amp;quot;How is it possible that those sacred historians, who carefully related all the miracles that took place at Christ's death, should have omitted to mention one so remarkable as the likeness of the body of our Lord remaining on its wrapping sheet? This fact undoubtedly deserved to be recorded. St John, in his Gospel, relates even how St Peter, having entered the sepulchre, saw the linen clothes lying on one side, and the napkin that was about his head on the other; but he does not say that there was a miraculous impression of our Lord's figure upon these clothes, and it is not to be imagined that he would have omitted to mention such a work of God if there had been any thing of this kind.&amp;quot;'', [[John Calvin]]: ''Traité des Reliques'', Geneve 1543, translated by '''Valerian Krasinski''': ''A treatise on Relics'', Edingburgh 1854&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Alleged absurdities and contradictions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biblical scientific foreknowledge is an underpinning of creation science, and is widely credited by Christian scientists and apologists, including the organizations [[Creation Ministries International]], [[Answers in Genesis]],  and [[CreationWiki]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationwiki.org/index.php/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://creationwiki.org/index.php/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge  Bible Scientific Foreknowledge]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1718/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v17/i1/medicine.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Atheists unsuccessfully attempt to discredit the Bible based on science.  Here are some examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bat as a bird ===&lt;br /&gt;
A favorite evolutionist canard is that Leviticus 11:13-19 labels the [[bat]], a [[mammal]], as a [[bird]].  But this is an obvious failure of translation, as the Hebrew term '' 'owph'' did not entail the &amp;quot;clade&amp;quot; of birds, but was a non-biological category referring to any winged creature, mammalian, avian, or insect.  The KJV translation as &amp;quot;fowl&amp;quot; is simply incorrect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Incorrect value of Pi ===&lt;br /&gt;
Two sections of the bible (1 Kings 7, 23-26, 2 Chronicles, 4, 2-5) appear to indicate that the correct value of [[Pi]] is 3, whereas Pi is in fact an irrational number, equalling approximately 3.14159. It has alleged by atheists, including [[Sam Harris]] and [[Richard Dawkins]], that this value indicates the fallacious nature of scripture.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Richard Dawkins Foundation, ''Reply to a Christian'', Sam Harris - [http://richarddawkins.net/articles/139]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, a simple explanation of the claimed &amp;quot;contradiction&amp;quot; is that the Bible records the ratio of the actual object which Hiram created, not that of a mathematical [[sphere]]. The claim that it was round all about does not equate to a claim that it was a perfect sphere, as atheists have claimed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Theology'', Volume 59, Issues 427-438,  Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge (Great Britain), London, 1956, p. 23 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, [[Pi]], when expressed as one significant digit, is equal to 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Christianity and Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Creation vs. Evolution Videos]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.creationwiki.org/Bible_scientific_foreknowledge Bible scientific foreknowledge] by [[CreationWiki]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Template:Creation vs. evolution}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Science]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Creationism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Dufrane&amp;diff=895956</id>
		<title>User talk:Dufrane</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Dufrane&amp;diff=895956"/>
		<updated>2011-08-01T19:30:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Two things: 1. Wikipedia is not a source; 2. this website will not post a scientific ''theory'' as if it's a ''fact''.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:35, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are new to wiki-style websites, how were you able to post an edit to the Dinosaur article, with a source, as well as hitting the revert function a couple times?  It's pretty easy, as you already know.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:48, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ah, Glory. I've figured it out. -Michael&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now... Why exactly were my discovery institute edits re: the letter campaign deleted? I was trying to highlight their efforts to document the significant number of scientists who don't believe in evolution, as well as provide a fair counterexample effort instituted by the left.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Dufrane&amp;diff=895954</id>
		<title>User talk:Dufrane</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Dufrane&amp;diff=895954"/>
		<updated>2011-08-01T19:26:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Two things: 1. Wikipedia is not a source; 2. this website will not post a scientific ''theory'' as if it's a ''fact''.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:35, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are new to wiki-style websites, how were you able to post an edit to the Dinosaur article, with a source, as well as hitting the revert function a couple times?  It's pretty easy, as you already know.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:48, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ah, Glory. I've figured it out. -Michael&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Dufrane&amp;diff=895953</id>
		<title>User talk:Dufrane</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Dufrane&amp;diff=895953"/>
		<updated>2011-08-01T19:26:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Two things: 1. Wikipedia is not a source; 2. this website will not post a scientific ''theory'' as if it's a ''fact''.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:35, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are new to wiki-style websites, how were you able to post an edit to the Dinosaur article, with a source, as well as hitting the revert function a couple times?  It's pretty easy, as you already know.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 14:48, 1 August 2011 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hello nonbelievers&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Dufrane&amp;diff=895940</id>
		<title>User:Dufrane</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Dufrane&amp;diff=895940"/>
		<updated>2011-08-01T19:04:08Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, I'm new to wiki-style websites. Would someone message me and tell me how to respond to others' messages? I can't figure it out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Michael&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thankfully the editing feature is rather self-evident. There's a little tab that simply says 'edit' and then you get the text box. The talk page has no such obvious talk box where I can reply to messages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps I'm simply overlooking something. I'd love to reply to you in my talk page but, as you're aware, I don't know how. Until then, I guess I'll update my user page to reply.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Dufrane&amp;diff=895932</id>
		<title>User:Dufrane</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User:Dufrane&amp;diff=895932"/>
		<updated>2011-08-01T18:38:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: Created page with &amp;quot;Sorry, I'm new to wiki-style websites. Would someone message me and tell me how to respond to others' messages? I can't figure it out.  -Michael&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Sorry, I'm new to wiki-style websites. Would someone message me and tell me how to respond to others' messages? I can't figure it out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Michael&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&amp;diff=895928</id>
		<title>Dinosaur</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&amp;diff=895928"/>
		<updated>2011-08-01T18:33:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: Undo revision 895924 by Karajou (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Taxonomy&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Dinosaur&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Fdt566e4.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|caption=&lt;br /&gt;
|superkingdom=&lt;br /&gt;
|kingdom= Animalia&lt;br /&gt;
|subkingdom=&lt;br /&gt;
|superphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|phylum=Chordata&lt;br /&gt;
|subphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|infraphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|microphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|superdivision=&lt;br /&gt;
|division=&lt;br /&gt;
|subdivision=&lt;br /&gt;
|superclass=&lt;br /&gt;
|class=Sauropsida&lt;br /&gt;
|subclass=Diapsida&lt;br /&gt;
|infraclass=Archosauromorpha&lt;br /&gt;
|superorder=Dinosauria&lt;br /&gt;
|order=Ornithischia; Saurischia &lt;br /&gt;
|suborder=&lt;br /&gt;
|infraorder=&lt;br /&gt;
|superfamily=&lt;br /&gt;
|family=&lt;br /&gt;
|subfamily=&lt;br /&gt;
|supertribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|tribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|subtribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|genera=&lt;br /&gt;
|genus=&lt;br /&gt;
|subgenus=&lt;br /&gt;
|species=&lt;br /&gt;
|binomialname=&lt;br /&gt;
|sub=&lt;br /&gt;
|alt=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Dinosaurs''' are usually believed to be extinct animals ranging in size from a few ounces to some of the largest land animals ever to exist. They were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (about 230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous (about 65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event led to the extinction of most dinosaur species at the close of the Mesozoic era.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinosaurs [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The word ''dinosaur'' was coined in 1841 by [[Richard Owen]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grigg, Russell, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1956/ Dinosaurs and dragons: stamping on the legends], ''Creation''&lt;br /&gt;
14(3):10–14, June 1992&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, from the Greek words for &amp;quot;terrible lizard&amp;quot;, and reflected the creatures' large size and fearsome appearance to the early paleontologists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Highlights of the history of dinosaur paleontology==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Osborn.jpg‎‎|200px|thumb|right|[[Henry Fairfield Osborn]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States during the 1900s, the public imagination was caught by the discoveries of [[Henry Fairfield Osborn]] (1857-1935) and the great competitive dinosaur hunters, Edward Drinker Cope (1847-1897) and Othniel Charles Marsh (1831-1899). Exploring in Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico, they found numerous fossil dinosaurs. Their museums worked out the techniques for mounting and displaying them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dinosaur Species==&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs were immensely varied, and included both herbivores and carnivores.  Although many have been found in the fossil record, paleontologists expect that they have barely scratched the surface of the vast superorder that the dinosaurs encompassed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/060905-dinosaurs_2.html Vast Majority of Dinosaurs Still to Be Found, Scientists Say], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===History of dinosaurs===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Michelangeloflood.jpg|thumb|250px|left|''The [[Great Flood|Flood]]'', by [[Michaelangelo]], detail from the [[Sistine Chapel]], 1509.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Creation science]] asserts that the biblical account, that dinosaurs were created on day 6 of [[creation]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Genesis'' 1:25&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; approximately  [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|6,000 years ago]], along with other land animals, and therefore co-existed with humans, thus [[Counterexamples to Evolution|debunking the Theory of Evolution]] and the beliefs of evolutionary scientists about the age of the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science shows that dinosaurs lived in harmony with other animals, (probably including in the [[Garden of Eden]]) eating only plants&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Genesis'' 1:29-30&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; that pairs of each dinosaur [[kind]] were taken onto [[Noah's Ark]] during the [[Great Flood]] and were preserved from drowning&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3967/ Were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark?], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; that many of the fossilized dinosaur bones originated during the mass killing of the Flood&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carl Wieland, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/219/ Dinosaur bones—just how old are they really?], ''Creation'', vol. 21 No. 1 p. 54&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; and that possibly some descendants of those dinosaurs taken aboard the Ark are still around today.&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Robert Doolan, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/833/ Are dinosaurs alive today?], ''Creation'', vol. 15 No. 4 p. 12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Archaeological]], [[fossil]], and documentary evidence supports the [[faith and science|logical]] conclusion that dinosaurs co-existed with mankind until at least relatively recent times.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[citation needed]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the term only came into use in the 19th century, the [[Bible]] does not use the word &amp;quot;dinosaur.&amp;quot;  However, there are numerous references throughout the biblical account. For example, the [[behemoth]] in [[Job]]  and the [[leviathan]] in [[Isaiah]] are clearly references to dinosaurs,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Allan K. Steel, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1799 Could Behemoth have been a dinosaur?], ''Journal of Creation'' vol. 15 No. 2 p. 42.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersincreation.org/job4041a.htm], ''Answers in Creation''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; although others have claimed that Behemoth and Leviathan are references to a hippopotamus or elephant and a crocodile respectively.  However, the Biblical descriptions do not fit those creatures, note that hippopotamuses and elephants do not have a &amp;quot;tail like a cedar&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Extinction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science rejects the &amp;quot;Great Impact Theory&amp;quot;, pointing out multiple problems with this theory. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2426 Did a meteor wipe out the dinosaurs?].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science shows that evolutionists are frequently coming out with a &amp;quot;New Theory of Dinosaur Extinction&amp;quot; and that their theories are laden with false assumptions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Matthews, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1115dinosaur.asp Dinosaur demise theory, version #451], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dinosaur-like creatures in history and modern sightings====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science cites a number of reasons to believe that dinosaurs have existed until relatively recent times, and perhaps still survive.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AZ_RockArtDino1a.jpg‎|right|150|thumb|right|Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which he claimed portrays dinosaurs and man coexisting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* There have been a number of sightings of dinosaur-like creatures reported by the [[best of the public]].&lt;br /&gt;
** A thousand people reported seeing a dinosaur-like monster in two sightings around Sayram Lake in Xinjiang according to the Chinese publication, China Today.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Locals in the Congo have reported a creature they name ''Mokele-mbembe''&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mokelembembe.com/ Mokele-mbembe The Living Dinosaur!]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and from its description it appears to be a small plant-eating dinosaur.  The reports have been taken seriously enough that a biologist from the [[University of Chicago]] has made several expeditions to find the creature.  Another biologist has reported seeing the creature.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Dinosaur-like creatures have been seen by several people in two different parts of [[Papua New Guinea]] since 1990.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Anon., [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/381 A living dinosaur?], ''Creation'' 23(1):56, December 2000.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Irwin, Brian, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5847 Theropod and sauropod dinosaurs sighted in PNG?] 1st July, 2008 (Creation Ministries International).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* There are drawings of creatures resembling dinosaurs.&lt;br /&gt;
** An expedition which included Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which he claimed portrays dinosaurs and man coexisting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationism.org/swift/DohenyExpedition/Doheny01Main.htm Doheny Scientific Expedition, Hava Supai Canyon, Arizona], ''Creationism.org''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_hava_supai_dinosaur_carving The Hava Supai Dinosaur Carving], ''ChristianCourier.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
** The Nile Mosaic of Palestrina, a second century BC piece of art, contains a portion which depicts a group of Ethiopians hunting what some claim appears to be a dinosaur; there is much debate on this, however, and most modern art historians consider the mysterious animal to be a lion or a crocodile (the latter theory is supported by the presence of the Greek word for &amp;quot;crocodile&amp;quot; written near the image of the mysterious animal). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.s8int.com/dinolit2.html Dinosaurs in Literature, Art &amp;amp; History-- Page 2], ''s8int.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palestrina1.jpg|right|thumb|A portion of the [[Nile Mosaic of Palestrina]], depicting the hunting of an animal which is often said to resemble a dinosaur (but which appears to be labelled &amp;quot;crocodile&amp;quot; in Greek).]] &lt;br /&gt;
** Engravings in the floor of Carlisle Cathedral appear to be of dinosaurs.  They are on the tomb of bishop Richard Bell, who died in 1496.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See picture on page 241 of Batten, Don, et. al., 2007, ''The Creation Answers Book''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Creatures matching dinosaurs and similar creatures have been described by various people groups.&lt;br /&gt;
** The description of the &amp;quot;[[Thunder bird]]&amp;quot; of [[American Indian]]s matches the descriptions of [[pterosaur]]s.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Descriptions of [[dragon]]s are widespread and match descriptions of dinosaurs, showing that dragons were real creatures and were actua very likely dinosaurs.&lt;br /&gt;
** The World Book Encyclopedia states that: &amp;quot;The [[dragon]]s of legend are strangely like actual creatures that have lived in the past. They are much like the great reptiles [dinosaurs] which inhabited the earth long before man is supposed to have appeared on earth.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quoted in [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ25.html What about the Dinosaurs?], ''CreationScience.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Dragons exist in the folklore of many European and Asian cultures.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;WB2000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''Dragon'' entry in World Book Millennium 2000 CD ROM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  World Book Encyclopedia says, &amp;quot;In Europe, dragons are traditionally portrayed as ferocious beasts that represent the evils fought by human beings.  But in Asia, especially in China and Japan, the animals are generally considered friendly creatures that ensure good luck and wealth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;WB2000&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Dragons appear in the flag of [[Wales]], in traditional [[China|Chinese]] New Years' Day celebrations, and in the Chinese [[calendar]].  Every other creature on the calendar is a real creature.&lt;br /&gt;
* That dinosaurs are not known from the fossil record above the [[Cretaceous]] strata is not reason to believe that they have not survived until more recent times.&lt;br /&gt;
** Living specimens of orders of animals that were believed to have been extinct for millions of years have been found before, such as the Diatomyidae Squirrel &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Diatomyidae]] Squirrel [http://news.softpedia.com/news/They-Thought-It-Went-Extinct-11-Million-Years-Ago-19557.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the Wollemi Pine &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wollemi Pine ''Biotechnology Australia'' [http://www.biotechnologyonline.gov.au/enviro/wollemi.cfm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the [[Coelacanth]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sulawesi Coelacanth. ''University Of California, Berkeley''[http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/vertebrates/coelacanth/coelacanths.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;More on the Coelacanth ''marinebio.org''[http://marinebio.org/species.asp?id=54]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Some believe the [[Loch Ness Monster]] to be a [[Plesiosaur]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The recent dinosaur tissue find is a strong rebuttal of the claim that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carl Wieland, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3042 Still soft and stretchy], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The Coelacanth are from a group that had previously been thought to have rudimentary limbs and so be the ancestor of land creatures, but this idea was dropped when living Coelacanths were discovered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/coelacanth.html Coelacanth: the world’s oldest fish?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Biologists see this as merely a minor adjustment to the story of evolution. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dinosaurs and birds ====&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science shows that the idea that birds are descendants of dinosaurs is not demonstrated by the evidence &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3833/106/ Bird evolution?], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andy McIntosh, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/540/ 100 years of airplanes—but these weren’t the first flying machines!], ''Creation'' vol. 26 No. 1 p. 44&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and that the dinosaur-bird connection is even disputed by some evolutionists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his article, &amp;quot;Fifteen ways to refute materialistic bigotry&amp;quot;, Dr. [[Jonathan Sarfati]] wrote regarding dinosaurs being descendants of birds:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|“The same logic applies to the dinosaur-[[bird]] debate. It is perfectly in order for creationists to cite [[Alan Feduccia|Feduccia]]’s devastating criticism against the idea that birds evolved ‘ground up’ from running dinosaurs (the cursorial theory). But the dino-to-bird advocates counter with equally powerful arguments against Feduccia’s ‘trees-down’ (arboreal) theory. The evidence indicates that the critics are ''both'' right — birds did not evolve either from running dinos or from tree-living mini-crocodiles. In fact, birds did not evolve from non-birds at all!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2610 15 ways to refute materialistic bigotry], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science also cites the evolutionist and [[atheism|atheist]] [[Ernst Mayr]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthews, Michael, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/1208mayr.asp 99 and still fighting God], 8th December, 2003 (Answers in Genesis).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who stated the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|“It must be admitted, however, that it is a considerable strain on one’s credulity to assume that finely balanced systems such as certain sense organs (the eye of vertebrates, or the bird’s feather) could be improved by random mutations.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes10.html In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood], ''Center for Scientific Creation''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Find the full quote on [http://books.google.com/books?id=mAIjnLp6r_MC&amp;amp;pg=PA296&amp;amp;lpg=PA296&amp;amp;dq=Ernst+Mayr+1942+%22It+must+be+admitted,+however,+that+it+is+a+considerable+strain+on+one%27s+credulity+to+assume%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=TRDzBtumPF&amp;amp;sig=XwvnT327A9sn3Uvs0RLOaQNo5Zo&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=P6H6Te37LMSwhAf03fimAw&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ved=0CBUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false], starting from line 6. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The March 2003 issue of ''Scientific American'' is also cited by creation scientists:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Of all the body coverings nature has designed, feathers are the most various and the most mysterious...The origin of feathers is a specific instance of the much more general question of the origin of evolutionary novelties--structures that have no clear antecedents in ancestral animals and no clear related structures (homologues) in contemporary relatives. Although evolutionary theory provides a robust explanation for the appearance of minor variations in the size and shape of creatures and their component parts, it does not yet give as much guidance for understanding the emergence of entirely new structures, including digits, limbs, eyes and feathers....&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Matthews, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/0313sciam.asp Scientific American admits creationists hit a sore spot], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000CD7F6-B16F-1E41-89E0809EC588EEDF Which Came First, the Feather or the Bird?], ''Scientific American''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science also shows that the comparative anatomy analysis done by evolutionists comparing bird bones and dinosaur bones is flawed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr. David N. Menton, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2005/0328discovery.asp &amp;quot;Ostrich-osaurus&amp;quot; Discovery?], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evolutionary/Old Earth Perspective===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PzMyers2.jpg|thumbnail|251px|right|There is excellent evidence that dinosaurs and man coexisted.  During a visit to the [[Creation Museum]], the evolutionist and [[atheism|atheist]] [[PZ Myers]] had noticeably greater difficulty than others climbing on and off a dinosaur model due to the fact that he was overweight and out of shape.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQQl2TMrgbM VIDEO] See also: [[Atheism and obesity]] and [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/reuvenim/4426093513/ Flickr], see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en  license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The view of [[atheism|atheists]], evolutionists  and others who accept the uniformitarian timescale is that dinosaurs existed on earth from 230 million years ago to 65 million years ago. In this view, the entire population of dinosaurs were wiped out by a mass extinction event (usually thought to be a meteorite) about 65 million years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
This precludes humans and dinosaurs co-existing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Extinction====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to evolutionists, close to 65 million years ago, at the end of the [[Cretaceous]] period, and the beginning of what is called the [[Tertiary]] period, an event occurred which has come to be known as the [[K-T Event]].  This event would have obliterated most life on Earth, plunging the world into something that would now be likened to global nuclear winter, through which few extant species could survive.  Although these scientists dispute the nature of the K-T Event (selecting among any number of catastrophes that could have caused the significant global cooling that resulted), most find that the claimed K-T Event was caused by the collision of a massive asteroid with the Earth, the dust and debris from which would have shrouded the sky for thousands of years, cooling Earth considerably.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kevin O Pope, &amp;quot;Meteorite impact and the mass extinction of species at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary,&amp;quot; Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, available at [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/19/11028]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  According to this view, the dinosaurs did not survive this cataclysm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/08/0823_020823_asteroid.html Prehistoric Asteroid &amp;quot;Killed Everything&amp;quot;], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A layer of rock containing high concentrations&amp;lt;!-- &amp;quot;High&amp;quot;, or just &amp;quot;higher than normal&amp;quot;? --&amp;gt; of [[Iridium]], a metal that is extremely rare on earth but common in asteroids, is said to be due to the vaporization and then fall of dust from the meteorite's impact, and its compression within the subsequent geological record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Ibid''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The evidence of a large impact crater can be found in rocks of the [[Yucatán]] Peninsula of the supposed age of this layer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0307_030307_impactcrater.html &amp;quot;Dinosaur-Killer&amp;quot; Asteroid Crater Imaged for First Time], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/education/events/cowen1b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists assert that the assumptions underpinning the methods used by modern geologists are incorrect, and even though the validity of a large impact is accepted, this does not consitute proof that the impact caused the extinction of the dinosaurs&amp;amp;mdash;although the abundance of dinosaur fossils in rocks found higher in the rock layers than the impact is drastically less than their abundance in rocks lower down.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====An Explosion of new species ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evolutionists speculate that a mass extinction of the dinosaurs removed a major food competitor, and predator, of smaller animals.  As a result of a new &amp;quot;vacancy&amp;quot; in the food chain, following the [[K-T Event]], it is theorized that vast speciation occurred, as the evolutionary pressure of a new cold age propelled animal species to adapt or die out.  According to this view, [[mammals]] were some of the main beneficiaries of this explosion: their fur allowed them to adapt to the cold, and their small size allowed them to conserve energy relative to the huge dinosaurs of the previous age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bennet, Shostak, Jakotsky, &amp;quot;Life in the Universe,&amp;quot; viewable at [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Universe-Jeffrey-Bennett/dp/0805385770]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dinosaurs and Birds====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a number of feathered fossils (claimed to be dinosaurs) have been discovered, and evolutionary scientists claim the similarity in the bone structure between birds and dinosaurs show that modern birds are a descendants of dinosaurs.  This is often cited as an example of [[macroevolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/10/1006_041006_feathery_dino.html New Dinosaur Discovered: T. Rex Cousin Had Feathers], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dinosaur fossils and Human Fossils and Geological Strata ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some evolutionary scientists assert that if human bones aren’t found with dinosaur bones, then dinosaurs and man didn’t live together.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hodge, Bodie, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/humans-and-dinosaurs If humans and dinosaurs lived together, why don’t we find human fossils with dinosaur fossils?] ''Answers'' 1(1):52, May 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH710.html Claim CH710] (The TalkOrigins Archive)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Creation scientists point out that this is a false assumption; if human bones aren’t found buried with dinosaur bones, it simply means they weren't buried together.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evolutionists speculate that [[radiometric dating]] of rocks containing dinosaur bones indicates them to have formed between 65 million years ago and 250 million years ago, whereas rocks with human bones in them are dated as being much newer (less than 5 million years old). Creation science shows that those methods of dating rocks provide false results, and therefore reject this argument.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/radiometric-dating-questions-and-answers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science points out that the fossil record contains mainly marine organisms and that a small sliver of the fossil record contains vertebrates and thus shows that we shouldn't expect to find many human fossils at all.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, as the biblical [[Great Flood|Flood]] would be a marine catastrophe, it would be expected that marine fossils would dominate the fossil record.  This is in fact what we find.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hodge, Bodie, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/PublicStore/pdfs/SampleChapter/10-2-267.pdf Why Don’t We Find Human &amp;amp; Dinosaur Fossils Together?] (chapter 13 of the New Answers Book), 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 70% of the Earth is covered in salt water which would also explain the dominance of marine fossils. In addition, creation scientists show there may have been a small pre-flood human population and that massive amounts of flood sediment are why we haven’t found human fossils in pre-biblical flood sediments.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NAB&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Also, creation scientists point out that we don't find human bones buried with [[coelacanth]]s yet humans and coelacanths coexist today.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''[[Saurischia]]''===&lt;br /&gt;
Herbivorous species were almost all quadrupedal.  They carried peg-like teeth which cut, rather than chewed, plant material; grinding of food was aided by gastroliths.  Carnivorous species were exclusively bipedal. &lt;br /&gt;
*Sauropoda&lt;br /&gt;
::Species of this infraorder are characterized by long necks and tails, barrel-shaped bodies, and column-like legs.  In three families (notably Diplodocidae, Brachiosauridae, and Titanosauroidea) there are species which are of extreme size, in excess of 125 feet in length and 100 tons, making them the largest animals to have walked the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Apatosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Brachiosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ultrasaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Seismosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Argentinosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Diplodocus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Theropoda&lt;br /&gt;
::Exclusively bipedal; forearms meant for grasping or holding.  Fossil evidence for several species indicate pack hunting. &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Coelophysis]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ornithomimus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Allosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Tyrannosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Deinonychus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Velociraptor]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Giganotosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''[[Ornithischia]]''===&lt;br /&gt;
Species of this group were all herbivorous; most were quadrupedal.  Front teeth were lacking, while a predentary bone was present in the front of the lower jaw.  Several species (mainly within ''Ceratopsia'') had a distinctive parrot-like beak.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ceratopsia&lt;br /&gt;
::Species of this infraorder carried one or more horns on their heads, as well as a shield-like frill to protect the neck.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Triceratops]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Pachyrhinosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Torosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Protoceratops]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Styracosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*Stegosauria&lt;br /&gt;
::Large dinosaurs with a row of bony plates on top of their backs, and several spikes used as a defensive weapon at the end of their tails.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Stegosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Huayangosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Kentrosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*Ankylosauria&lt;br /&gt;
::Heavily-armored dinosaurs, some with a row of spikes along each side, and possessing a bony tail club.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ankylosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Euoplocephalus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Edmontonia]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*Ornithopods&lt;br /&gt;
::Large, herd-dwelling dinosaurs that could run bipedaly.  Several species had a &amp;quot;boss&amp;quot; of bone on their heads (Pachycephalosaurs) which may have been used for head-butting similar to bighorn sheep; others a crest of bone (hadrosaurs) which may have been sound resonators. &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Camptosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Iguanodon]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Pachycephalosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Parasaurolophus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Edmontosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Bactrosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Maiasaura]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== In Popular Culture ==&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs have been a fixture of popular culture since their discovery. It is theorized that some of the myths of fantastical creatures stem from the accidental discovery of dinosaur fossils. More recently, dinosaurs have featured in popular stories including books, movies, television, video games, even music.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs were introduced to a wide modern audience when movies like the Jurassic Park series were released.&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irreligion and superstition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Young earth creationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==	 &lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dinosaurs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Discovery_Institute&amp;diff=895927</id>
		<title>Discovery Institute</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Discovery_Institute&amp;diff=895927"/>
		<updated>2011-08-01T18:33:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Phillip_johnson_arn.gif|thumbnail|150px|right|[[Phillip E. Johnson]], Professor of Law, cofounder of the Center for Science and Culture]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Discovery Institute''' is a [[Seattle]]-based [[religious]] research institution as well as conservative think tank. While the institute has multiple areas of focus, including economics, bioethics, and foreign policy, it is most well known for its role as one of the major proponents of [[intelligent design]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since its foundation in 1994, the Discovery Institute has been at the head of scientific research into anti-Darwinian science through the development of Intelligent Design, which encompasses biology, information theory, statistics, and geology.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Center for Science and Culture ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Stephen Meyer.jpg|thumb|150px|left|Dr. [[Stephen Meyer]] Director and Senior Fellow of the Center for Science and Culture at the Discovery Institute]]&lt;br /&gt;
Key to the Discovery Institute's mission is its Center for Science and Culture (CSC)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.discovery.org/csc/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, founded by philosopher of science [[Stephen Meyer]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''The Center for Science and Culture''' is a program that encourages schools to improve science education by teaching students more fully about the theory of evolution, as well as supporting the work of scholars who challenge various aspects of neo-Darwinian theory and scholars who are working on the scientific theory known as intelligent design. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to scientific research and scholarship, the Center's '''Evolution News and Views''' blog&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.evolutionnews.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; presents analysis of that relevant news coverage, as well as original reporting that accurately delivers information about the current state of the debate over Darwinian evolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A related website, '''intelligentdesign.org'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.intelligentdesign.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; provides up-to-date information and learning resources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The CSC lays claim to the theorists [[William Dembski]], originator of the &amp;quot;specified complexity&amp;quot; theory, and [[Michael Behe]] founder of the theory of &amp;quot;irreducible complexity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notably, in 2007, &amp;quot;[[Discovery Institute]]'s Center for Science and Culture...announced that over 700 scientists from around the world have now signed a statement expressing their skepticism about the contemporary theory of [[Charles Darwin|Darwinian]] evolution.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.discovery.org/a/2732&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. Meanwhile, the [[National Center for Science Education]] produced a petition showing that there were over 1100 scientists named &amp;quot;Steve&amp;quot; (and variations thereof, such as Stephen and Stephanie) that supported evolution. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Steve&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Notable fellows ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Phillip E. Johnson]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Stephen C. Meyer]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Michael Behe]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Dembski]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jonathan Wells]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[William Lane Craig]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Centre for Intelligent Design]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.discovery.org Official Website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Creation_vs._evolution}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Intelligent Design]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&amp;diff=895923</id>
		<title>Dinosaur</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&amp;diff=895923"/>
		<updated>2011-08-01T18:12:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: Undo revision 895922 by SeanS (talk)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Taxonomy&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Dinosaur&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Fdt566e4.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|caption=&lt;br /&gt;
|superkingdom=&lt;br /&gt;
|kingdom= Animalia&lt;br /&gt;
|subkingdom=&lt;br /&gt;
|superphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|phylum=Chordata&lt;br /&gt;
|subphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|infraphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|microphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|superdivision=&lt;br /&gt;
|division=&lt;br /&gt;
|subdivision=&lt;br /&gt;
|superclass=&lt;br /&gt;
|class=Sauropsida&lt;br /&gt;
|subclass=Diapsida&lt;br /&gt;
|infraclass=Archosauromorpha&lt;br /&gt;
|superorder=Dinosauria&lt;br /&gt;
|order=Ornithischia; Saurischia &lt;br /&gt;
|suborder=&lt;br /&gt;
|infraorder=&lt;br /&gt;
|superfamily=&lt;br /&gt;
|family=&lt;br /&gt;
|subfamily=&lt;br /&gt;
|supertribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|tribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|subtribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|genera=&lt;br /&gt;
|genus=&lt;br /&gt;
|subgenus=&lt;br /&gt;
|species=&lt;br /&gt;
|binomialname=&lt;br /&gt;
|sub=&lt;br /&gt;
|alt=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Dinosaurs''' are usually believed to be extinct animals ranging in size from a few ounces to some of the largest land animals ever to exist. They were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (about 230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous (about 65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event led to the extinction of most dinosaur species at the close of the Mesozoic era.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinosaurs [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The word ''dinosaur'' was coined in 1841 by [[Richard Owen]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grigg, Russell, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1956/ Dinosaurs and dragons: stamping on the legends], ''Creation''&lt;br /&gt;
14(3):10–14, June 1992&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, from the Greek words for &amp;quot;terrible lizard&amp;quot;, and reflected the creatures' large size and fearsome appearance to the early paleontologists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Highlights of the history of dinosaur paleontology==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Osborn.jpg‎‎|200px|thumb|right|[[Henry Fairfield Osborn]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States during the 1900s, the public imagination was caught by the discoveries of [[Henry Fairfield Osborn]] (1857-1935) and the great competitive dinosaur hunters, Edward Drinker Cope (1847-1897) and Othniel Charles Marsh (1831-1899). Exploring in Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico, they found numerous fossil dinosaurs. Their museums worked out the techniques for mounting and displaying them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dinosaur Species==&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs were immensely varied, and included both herbivores and carnivores.  Although many have been found in the fossil record, paleontologists expect that they have barely scratched the surface of the vast superorder that the dinosaurs encompassed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/060905-dinosaurs_2.html Vast Majority of Dinosaurs Still to Be Found, Scientists Say], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===History of dinosaurs===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Michelangeloflood.jpg|thumb|250px|left|''The [[Great Flood|Flood]]'', by [[Michaelangelo]], detail from the [[Sistine Chapel]], 1509.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Creation science]] asserts that the biblical account, that dinosaurs were created on day 6 of [[creation]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Genesis'' 1:25&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; approximately  [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|6,000 years ago]], along with other land animals, and therefore co-existed with humans, thus [[Counterexamples to Evolution|debunking the Theory of Evolution]] and the beliefs of evolutionary scientists about the age of the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science shows that dinosaurs lived in harmony with other animals, (probably including in the [[Garden of Eden]]) eating only plants&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Genesis'' 1:29-30&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; that pairs of each dinosaur [[kind]] were taken onto [[Noah's Ark]] during the [[Great Flood]] and were preserved from drowning&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3967/ Were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark?], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; that many of the fossilized dinosaur bones originated during the mass killing of the Flood&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carl Wieland, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/219/ Dinosaur bones—just how old are they really?], ''Creation'', vol. 21 No. 1 p. 54&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; and that possibly some descendants of those dinosaurs taken aboard the Ark are still around today.&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Robert Doolan, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/833/ Are dinosaurs alive today?], ''Creation'', vol. 15 No. 4 p. 12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Archaeological]], [[fossil]], and documentary evidence supports the [[faith and science|logical]] conclusion that dinosaurs co-existed with mankind until at least relatively recent times.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[citation needed]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the term only came into use in the 19th century, the [[Bible]] does not use the word &amp;quot;dinosaur.&amp;quot;  However, there are numerous references throughout the biblical account. For example, the [[behemoth]] in [[Job]]  and the [[leviathan]] in [[Isaiah]] are clearly references to dinosaurs,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Allan K. Steel, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1799 Could Behemoth have been a dinosaur?], ''Journal of Creation'' vol. 15 No. 2 p. 42.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersincreation.org/job4041a.htm], ''Answers in Creation''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; although others have claimed that Behemoth and Leviathan are references to a hippopotamus or elephant and a crocodile respectively.  However, the Biblical descriptions do not fit those creatures, note that hippopotamuses and elephants do not have a &amp;quot;tail like a cedar&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Extinction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science rejects the &amp;quot;Great Impact Theory&amp;quot;, pointing out multiple problems with this theory. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2426 Did a meteor wipe out the dinosaurs?].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science shows that evolutionists are frequently coming out with a &amp;quot;New Theory of Dinosaur Extinction&amp;quot; and that their theories are laden with false assumptions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Matthews, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1115dinosaur.asp Dinosaur demise theory, version #451], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dinosaur-like creatures in history and modern sightings====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science cites a number of reasons to believe that dinosaurs have existed until relatively recent times, and perhaps still survive.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AZ_RockArtDino1a.jpg‎|right|150|thumb|right|Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which he claimed portrays dinosaurs and man coexisting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* There have been a number of sightings of dinosaur-like creatures reported by the [[best of the public]].&lt;br /&gt;
** A thousand people reported seeing a dinosaur-like monster in two sightings around Sayram Lake in Xinjiang according to the Chinese publication, China Today.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Locals in the Congo have reported a creature they name ''Mokele-mbembe''&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mokelembembe.com/ Mokele-mbembe The Living Dinosaur!]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and from its description it appears to be a small plant-eating dinosaur.  The reports have been taken seriously enough that a biologist from the [[University of Chicago]] has made several expeditions to find the creature.  Another biologist has reported seeing the creature.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Dinosaur-like creatures have been seen by several people in two different parts of [[Papua New Guinea]] since 1990.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Anon., [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/381 A living dinosaur?], ''Creation'' 23(1):56, December 2000.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Irwin, Brian, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5847 Theropod and sauropod dinosaurs sighted in PNG?] 1st July, 2008 (Creation Ministries International).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* There are drawings of creatures resembling dinosaurs.&lt;br /&gt;
** An expedition which included Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which he claimed portrays dinosaurs and man coexisting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationism.org/swift/DohenyExpedition/Doheny01Main.htm Doheny Scientific Expedition, Hava Supai Canyon, Arizona], ''Creationism.org''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_hava_supai_dinosaur_carving The Hava Supai Dinosaur Carving], ''ChristianCourier.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
** The Nile Mosaic of Palestrina, a second century BC piece of art, contains a portion which depicts a group of Ethiopians hunting what some claim appears to be a dinosaur; there is much debate on this, however, and most modern art historians consider the mysterious animal to be a lion or a crocodile (the latter theory is supported by the presence of the Greek word for &amp;quot;crocodile&amp;quot; written near the image of the mysterious animal). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.s8int.com/dinolit2.html Dinosaurs in Literature, Art &amp;amp; History-- Page 2], ''s8int.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palestrina1.jpg|right|thumb|A portion of the [[Nile Mosaic of Palestrina]], depicting the hunting of an animal which is often said to resemble a dinosaur (but which appears to be labelled &amp;quot;crocodile&amp;quot; in Greek).]] &lt;br /&gt;
** Engravings in the floor of Carlisle Cathedral appear to be of dinosaurs.  They are on the tomb of bishop Richard Bell, who died in 1496.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See picture on page 241 of Batten, Don, et. al., 2007, ''The Creation Answers Book''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Creatures matching dinosaurs and similar creatures have been described by various people groups.&lt;br /&gt;
** The description of the &amp;quot;[[Thunder bird]]&amp;quot; of [[American Indian]]s matches the descriptions of [[pterosaur]]s.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Descriptions of [[dragon]]s are widespread and match descriptions of dinosaurs, showing that dragons were real creatures and were actua very likely dinosaurs.&lt;br /&gt;
** The World Book Encyclopedia states that: &amp;quot;The [[dragon]]s of legend are strangely like actual creatures that have lived in the past. They are much like the great reptiles [dinosaurs] which inhabited the earth long before man is supposed to have appeared on earth.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quoted in [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ25.html What about the Dinosaurs?], ''CreationScience.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Dragons exist in the folklore of many European and Asian cultures.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;WB2000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''Dragon'' entry in World Book Millennium 2000 CD ROM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  World Book Encyclopedia says, &amp;quot;In Europe, dragons are traditionally portrayed as ferocious beasts that represent the evils fought by human beings.  But in Asia, especially in China and Japan, the animals are generally considered friendly creatures that ensure good luck and wealth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;WB2000&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Dragons appear in the flag of [[Wales]], in traditional [[China|Chinese]] New Years' Day celebrations, and in the Chinese [[calendar]].  Every other creature on the calendar is a real creature.&lt;br /&gt;
* That dinosaurs are not known from the fossil record above the [[Cretaceous]] strata is not reason to believe that they have not survived until more recent times.&lt;br /&gt;
** Living specimens of orders of animals that were believed to have been extinct for millions of years have been found before, such as the Diatomyidae Squirrel &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Diatomyidae]] Squirrel [http://news.softpedia.com/news/They-Thought-It-Went-Extinct-11-Million-Years-Ago-19557.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the Wollemi Pine &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wollemi Pine ''Biotechnology Australia'' [http://www.biotechnologyonline.gov.au/enviro/wollemi.cfm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the [[Coelacanth]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sulawesi Coelacanth. ''University Of California, Berkeley''[http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/vertebrates/coelacanth/coelacanths.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;More on the Coelacanth ''marinebio.org''[http://marinebio.org/species.asp?id=54]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Some believe the [[Loch Ness Monster]] to be a [[Plesiosaur]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The recent dinosaur tissue find is a strong rebuttal of the claim that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carl Wieland, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3042 Still soft and stretchy], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The Coelacanth are from a group that had previously been thought to have rudimentary limbs and so be the ancestor of land creatures, but this idea was dropped when living Coelacanths were discovered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/coelacanth.html Coelacanth: the world’s oldest fish?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Biologists see this as merely a minor adjustment to the story of evolution. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dinosaurs and birds ====&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science shows that the idea that birds are descendants of dinosaurs is not demonstrated by the evidence &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3833/106/ Bird evolution?], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andy McIntosh, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/540/ 100 years of airplanes—but these weren’t the first flying machines!], ''Creation'' vol. 26 No. 1 p. 44&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and that the dinosaur-bird connection is even disputed by some evolutionists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his article, &amp;quot;Fifteen ways to refute materialistic bigotry&amp;quot;, Dr. [[Jonathan Sarfati]] wrote regarding dinosaurs being descendants of birds:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|“The same logic applies to the dinosaur-[[bird]] debate. It is perfectly in order for creationists to cite [[Alan Feduccia|Feduccia]]’s devastating criticism against the idea that birds evolved ‘ground up’ from running dinosaurs (the cursorial theory). But the dino-to-bird advocates counter with equally powerful arguments against Feduccia’s ‘trees-down’ (arboreal) theory. The evidence indicates that the critics are ''both'' right — birds did not evolve either from running dinos or from tree-living mini-crocodiles. In fact, birds did not evolve from non-birds at all!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2610 15 ways to refute materialistic bigotry], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science also cites the evolutionist and [[atheism|atheist]] [[Ernst Mayr]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthews, Michael, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/1208mayr.asp 99 and still fighting God], 8th December, 2003 (Answers in Genesis).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who stated the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|“It must be admitted, however, that it is a considerable strain on one’s credulity to assume that finely balanced systems such as certain sense organs (the eye of vertebrates, or the bird’s feather) could be improved by random mutations.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes10.html In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood], ''Center for Scientific Creation''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Find the full quote on [http://books.google.com/books?id=mAIjnLp6r_MC&amp;amp;pg=PA296&amp;amp;lpg=PA296&amp;amp;dq=Ernst+Mayr+1942+%22It+must+be+admitted,+however,+that+it+is+a+considerable+strain+on+one%27s+credulity+to+assume%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=TRDzBtumPF&amp;amp;sig=XwvnT327A9sn3Uvs0RLOaQNo5Zo&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=P6H6Te37LMSwhAf03fimAw&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ved=0CBUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false], starting from line 6. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The March 2003 issue of ''Scientific American'' is also cited by creation scientists:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Of all the body coverings nature has designed, feathers are the most various and the most mysterious...The origin of feathers is a specific instance of the much more general question of the origin of evolutionary novelties--structures that have no clear antecedents in ancestral animals and no clear related structures (homologues) in contemporary relatives. Although evolutionary theory provides a robust explanation for the appearance of minor variations in the size and shape of creatures and their component parts, it does not yet give as much guidance for understanding the emergence of entirely new structures, including digits, limbs, eyes and feathers....&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Matthews, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/0313sciam.asp Scientific American admits creationists hit a sore spot], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000CD7F6-B16F-1E41-89E0809EC588EEDF Which Came First, the Feather or the Bird?], ''Scientific American''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science also shows that the comparative anatomy analysis done by evolutionists comparing bird bones and dinosaur bones is flawed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr. David N. Menton, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2005/0328discovery.asp &amp;quot;Ostrich-osaurus&amp;quot; Discovery?], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evolutionary/Old Earth Perspective===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PzMyers2.jpg|thumbnail|251px|right|There is excellent evidence that dinosaurs and man coexisted.  During a visit to the [[Creation Museum]], the evolutionist and [[atheism|atheist]] [[PZ Myers]] had noticeably greater difficulty than others climbing on and off a dinosaur model due to the fact that he was overweight and out of shape.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQQl2TMrgbM VIDEO] See also: [[Atheism and obesity]] and [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/reuvenim/4426093513/ Flickr], see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en  license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The view of [[atheism|atheists]], evolutionists  and others who accept the uniformitarian timescale is that dinosaurs existed on earth from 230 million years ago to 65 million years ago. In this view, the entire population of dinosaurs were wiped out by a mass extinction event (usually thought to be a meteorite) about 65 million years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
This precludes humans and dinosaurs co-existing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Extinction====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to evolutionists, close to 65 million years ago, at the end of the [[Cretaceous]] period, and the beginning of what is called the [[Tertiary]] period, an event occurred which has come to be known as the [[K-T Event]].  This event would have obliterated most life on Earth, plunging the world into something that would now be likened to global nuclear winter, through which few extant species could survive.  Although these scientists dispute the nature of the K-T Event (selecting among any number of catastrophes that could have caused the significant global cooling that resulted), most find that the claimed K-T Event was caused by the collision of a massive asteroid with the Earth, the dust and debris from which would have shrouded the sky for thousands of years, cooling Earth considerably.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kevin O Pope, &amp;quot;Meteorite impact and the mass extinction of species at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary,&amp;quot; Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, available at [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/19/11028]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  According to this view, the dinosaurs did not survive this cataclysm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/08/0823_020823_asteroid.html Prehistoric Asteroid &amp;quot;Killed Everything&amp;quot;], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A layer of rock containing high concentrations&amp;lt;!-- &amp;quot;High&amp;quot;, or just &amp;quot;higher than normal&amp;quot;? --&amp;gt; of [[Iridium]], a metal that is extremely rare on earth but common in asteroids, is said to be due to the vaporization and then fall of dust from the meteorite's impact, and its compression within the subsequent geological record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Ibid''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The evidence of a large impact crater can be found in rocks of the [[Yucatán]] Peninsula of the supposed age of this layer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0307_030307_impactcrater.html &amp;quot;Dinosaur-Killer&amp;quot; Asteroid Crater Imaged for First Time], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/education/events/cowen1b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists assert that the assumptions underpinning the methods used by modern geologists are incorrect, and even though the validity of a large impact is accepted, this does not consitute proof that the impact caused the extinction of the dinosaurs&amp;amp;mdash;although the abundance of dinosaur fossils in rocks found higher in the rock layers than the impact is drastically less than their abundance in rocks lower down.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====An Explosion of new species ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evolutionists speculate that a mass extinction of the dinosaurs removed a major food competitor, and predator, of smaller animals.  As a result of a new &amp;quot;vacancy&amp;quot; in the food chain, following the [[K-T Event]], it is theorized that vast speciation occurred, as the evolutionary pressure of a new cold age propelled animal species to adapt or die out.  According to this view, [[mammals]] were some of the main beneficiaries of this explosion: their fur allowed them to adapt to the cold, and their small size allowed them to conserve energy relative to the huge dinosaurs of the previous age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bennet, Shostak, Jakotsky, &amp;quot;Life in the Universe,&amp;quot; viewable at [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Universe-Jeffrey-Bennett/dp/0805385770]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dinosaurs and Birds====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a number of feathered fossils (claimed to be dinosaurs) have been discovered, and evolutionary scientists claim the similarity in the bone structure between birds and dinosaurs show that modern birds are a descendants of dinosaurs.  This is often cited as an example of [[macroevolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/10/1006_041006_feathery_dino.html New Dinosaur Discovered: T. Rex Cousin Had Feathers], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dinosaur fossils and Human Fossils and Geological Strata ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some evolutionary scientists assert that if human bones aren’t found with dinosaur bones, then dinosaurs and man didn’t live together.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hodge, Bodie, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/humans-and-dinosaurs If humans and dinosaurs lived together, why don’t we find human fossils with dinosaur fossils?] ''Answers'' 1(1):52, May 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH710.html Claim CH710] (The TalkOrigins Archive)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Creation scientists point out that this is a false assumption; if human bones aren’t found buried with dinosaur bones, it simply means they weren't buried together.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evolutionists speculate that [[radiometric dating]] of rocks containing dinosaur bones indicates them to have formed between 65 million years ago and 250 million years ago, whereas rocks with human bones in them are dated as being much newer (less than 5 million years old). Creation science shows that those methods of dating rocks provide false results, and therefore reject this argument.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/radiometric-dating-questions-and-answers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science points out that the fossil record contains mainly marine organisms and that a small sliver of the fossil record contains vertebrates and thus shows that we shouldn't expect to find many human fossils at all.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, as the biblical [[Great Flood|Flood]] would be a marine catastrophe, it would be expected that marine fossils would dominate the fossil record.  This is in fact what we find.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hodge, Bodie, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/PublicStore/pdfs/SampleChapter/10-2-267.pdf Why Don’t We Find Human &amp;amp; Dinosaur Fossils Together?] (chapter 13 of the New Answers Book), 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 70% of the Earth is covered in salt water which would also explain the dominance of marine fossils. In addition, creation scientists show there may have been a small pre-flood human population and that massive amounts of flood sediment are why we haven’t found human fossils in pre-biblical flood sediments.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NAB&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Also, creation scientists point out that we don't find human bones buried with [[coelacanth]]s yet humans and coelacanths coexist today.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''[[Saurischia]]''===&lt;br /&gt;
Herbivorous species were almost all quadrupedal.  They carried peg-like teeth which cut, rather than chewed, plant material; grinding of food was aided by gastroliths.  Carnivorous species were exclusively bipedal. &lt;br /&gt;
*Sauropoda&lt;br /&gt;
::Species of this infraorder are characterized by long necks and tails, barrel-shaped bodies, and column-like legs.  In three families (notably Diplodocidae, Brachiosauridae, and Titanosauroidea) there are species which are of extreme size, in excess of 125 feet in length and 100 tons, making them the largest animals to have walked the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Apatosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Brachiosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ultrasaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Seismosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Argentinosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Diplodocus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Theropoda&lt;br /&gt;
::Exclusively bipedal; forearms meant for grasping or holding.  Fossil evidence for several species indicate pack hunting. &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Coelophysis]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ornithomimus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Allosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Tyrannosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Deinonychus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Velociraptor]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Giganotosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''[[Ornithischia]]''===&lt;br /&gt;
Species of this group were all herbivorous; most were quadrupedal.  Front teeth were lacking, while a predentary bone was present in the front of the lower jaw.  Several species (mainly within ''Ceratopsia'') had a distinctive parrot-like beak.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ceratopsia&lt;br /&gt;
::Species of this infraorder carried one or more horns on their heads, as well as a shield-like frill to protect the neck.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Triceratops]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Pachyrhinosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Torosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Protoceratops]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Styracosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*Stegosauria&lt;br /&gt;
::Large dinosaurs with a row of bony plates on top of their backs, and several spikes used as a defensive weapon at the end of their tails.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Stegosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Huayangosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Kentrosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*Ankylosauria&lt;br /&gt;
::Heavily-armored dinosaurs, some with a row of spikes along each side, and possessing a bony tail club.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ankylosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Euoplocephalus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Edmontonia]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*Ornithopods&lt;br /&gt;
::Large, herd-dwelling dinosaurs that could run bipedaly.  Several species had a &amp;quot;boss&amp;quot; of bone on their heads (Pachycephalosaurs) which may have been used for head-butting similar to bighorn sheep; others a crest of bone (hadrosaurs) which may have been sound resonators. &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Camptosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Iguanodon]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Pachycephalosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Parasaurolophus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Edmontosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Bactrosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Maiasaura]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== In Popular Culture ==&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs have been a fixture of popular culture since their discovery. It is theorized that some of the myths of fantastical creatures stem from the accidental discovery of dinosaur fossils. More recently, dinosaurs have featured in popular stories including books, movies, television, video games, even music.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs were introduced to a wide modern audience when movies like the Jurassic Park series were released.&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irreligion and superstition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Young earth creationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==	 &lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dinosaurs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&amp;diff=895921</id>
		<title>Dinosaur</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dinosaur&amp;diff=895921"/>
		<updated>2011-08-01T18:04:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dufrane: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Taxonomy&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Dinosaur&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Fdt566e4.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|caption=&lt;br /&gt;
|superkingdom=&lt;br /&gt;
|kingdom= Animalia&lt;br /&gt;
|subkingdom=&lt;br /&gt;
|superphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|phylum=Chordata&lt;br /&gt;
|subphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|infraphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|microphylum=&lt;br /&gt;
|superdivision=&lt;br /&gt;
|division=&lt;br /&gt;
|subdivision=&lt;br /&gt;
|superclass=&lt;br /&gt;
|class=Sauropsida&lt;br /&gt;
|subclass=Diapsida&lt;br /&gt;
|infraclass=Archosauromorpha&lt;br /&gt;
|superorder=Dinosauria&lt;br /&gt;
|order=Ornithischia; Saurischia &lt;br /&gt;
|suborder=&lt;br /&gt;
|infraorder=&lt;br /&gt;
|superfamily=&lt;br /&gt;
|family=&lt;br /&gt;
|subfamily=&lt;br /&gt;
|supertribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|tribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|subtribe=&lt;br /&gt;
|genera=&lt;br /&gt;
|genus=&lt;br /&gt;
|subgenus=&lt;br /&gt;
|species=&lt;br /&gt;
|binomialname=&lt;br /&gt;
|sub=&lt;br /&gt;
|alt=&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Dinosaurs''' are usually believed to be extinct animals ranging in size from a few ounces to some of the largest land animals ever to exist. They were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (about 230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous (about 65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event led to the extinction of most dinosaur species at the close of the Mesozoic era.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The word ''dinosaur'' was coined in 1841 by [[Richard Owen]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Grigg, Russell, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1956/ Dinosaurs and dragons: stamping on the legends], ''Creation''&lt;br /&gt;
14(3):10–14, June 1992&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, from the Greek words for &amp;quot;terrible lizard&amp;quot;, and reflected the creatures' large size and fearsome appearance to the early paleontologists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Highlights of the history of dinosaur paleontology==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Osborn.jpg‎‎|200px|thumb|right|[[Henry Fairfield Osborn]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States during the 1900s, the public imagination was caught by the discoveries of [[Henry Fairfield Osborn]] (1857-1935) and the great competitive dinosaur hunters, Edward Drinker Cope (1847-1897) and Othniel Charles Marsh (1831-1899). Exploring in Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico, they found numerous fossil dinosaurs. Their museums worked out the techniques for mounting and displaying them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dinosaur Species==&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs were immensely varied, and included both herbivores and carnivores.  Although many have been found in the fossil record, paleontologists expect that they have barely scratched the surface of the vast superorder that the dinosaurs encompassed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/09/060905-dinosaurs_2.html Vast Majority of Dinosaurs Still to Be Found, Scientists Say], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===History of dinosaurs===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Michelangeloflood.jpg|thumb|250px|left|''The [[Great Flood|Flood]]'', by [[Michaelangelo]], detail from the [[Sistine Chapel]], 1509.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Creation science]] asserts that the biblical account, that dinosaurs were created on day 6 of [[creation]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Genesis'' 1:25&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; approximately  [[Counterexamples to an Old Earth|6,000 years ago]], along with other land animals, and therefore co-existed with humans, thus [[Counterexamples to Evolution|debunking the Theory of Evolution]] and the beliefs of evolutionary scientists about the age of the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science shows that dinosaurs lived in harmony with other animals, (probably including in the [[Garden of Eden]]) eating only plants&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Genesis'' 1:29-30&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; that pairs of each dinosaur [[kind]] were taken onto [[Noah's Ark]] during the [[Great Flood]] and were preserved from drowning&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3967/ Were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark?], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; that many of the fossilized dinosaur bones originated during the mass killing of the Flood&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carl Wieland, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/219/ Dinosaur bones—just how old are they really?], ''Creation'', vol. 21 No. 1 p. 54&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; and that possibly some descendants of those dinosaurs taken aboard the Ark are still around today.&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Robert Doolan, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/833/ Are dinosaurs alive today?], ''Creation'', vol. 15 No. 4 p. 12.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Archaeological]], [[fossil]], and documentary evidence supports the [[faith and science|logical]] conclusion that dinosaurs co-existed with mankind until at least relatively recent times.&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[citation needed]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the term only came into use in the 19th century, the [[Bible]] does not use the word &amp;quot;dinosaur.&amp;quot;  However, there are numerous references throughout the biblical account. For example, the [[behemoth]] in [[Job]]  and the [[leviathan]] in [[Isaiah]] are clearly references to dinosaurs,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Allan K. Steel, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1799 Could Behemoth have been a dinosaur?], ''Journal of Creation'' vol. 15 No. 2 p. 42.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.answersincreation.org/job4041a.htm], ''Answers in Creation''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; although others have claimed that Behemoth and Leviathan are references to a hippopotamus or elephant and a crocodile respectively.  However, the Biblical descriptions do not fit those creatures, note that hippopotamuses and elephants do not have a &amp;quot;tail like a cedar&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Extinction ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science rejects the &amp;quot;Great Impact Theory&amp;quot;, pointing out multiple problems with this theory. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2426 Did a meteor wipe out the dinosaurs?].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science shows that evolutionists are frequently coming out with a &amp;quot;New Theory of Dinosaur Extinction&amp;quot; and that their theories are laden with false assumptions. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Matthews, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/1115dinosaur.asp Dinosaur demise theory, version #451], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dinosaur-like creatures in history and modern sightings====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science cites a number of reasons to believe that dinosaurs have existed until relatively recent times, and perhaps still survive.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:AZ_RockArtDino1a.jpg‎|right|150|thumb|right|Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which he claimed portrays dinosaurs and man coexisting]]&lt;br /&gt;
* There have been a number of sightings of dinosaur-like creatures reported by the [[best of the public]].&lt;br /&gt;
** A thousand people reported seeing a dinosaur-like monster in two sightings around Sayram Lake in Xinjiang according to the Chinese publication, China Today.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Locals in the Congo have reported a creature they name ''Mokele-mbembe''&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mokelembembe.com/ Mokele-mbembe The Living Dinosaur!]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and from its description it appears to be a small plant-eating dinosaur.  The reports have been taken seriously enough that a biologist from the [[University of Chicago]] has made several expeditions to find the creature.  Another biologist has reported seeing the creature.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Dinosaur-like creatures have been seen by several people in two different parts of [[Papua New Guinea]] since 1990.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Anon., [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/381 A living dinosaur?], ''Creation'' 23(1):56, December 2000.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Irwin, Brian, [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5847 Theropod and sauropod dinosaurs sighted in PNG?] 1st July, 2008 (Creation Ministries International).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* There are drawings of creatures resembling dinosaurs.&lt;br /&gt;
** An expedition which included Charles W. Gilmore, Curator of Vertebrate Paleontology with the United States National Museum, examined an ancient pictograph which he claimed portrays dinosaurs and man coexisting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationism.org/swift/DohenyExpedition/Doheny01Main.htm Doheny Scientific Expedition, Hava Supai Canyon, Arizona], ''Creationism.org''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christiancourier.com/articles/read/the_hava_supai_dinosaur_carving The Hava Supai Dinosaur Carving], ''ChristianCourier.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
** The Nile Mosaic of Palestrina, a second century BC piece of art, contains a portion which depicts a group of Ethiopians hunting what some claim appears to be a dinosaur; there is much debate on this, however, and most modern art historians consider the mysterious animal to be a lion or a crocodile (the latter theory is supported by the presence of the Greek word for &amp;quot;crocodile&amp;quot; written near the image of the mysterious animal). &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.s8int.com/dinolit2.html Dinosaurs in Literature, Art &amp;amp; History-- Page 2], ''s8int.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Palestrina1.jpg|right|thumb|A portion of the [[Nile Mosaic of Palestrina]], depicting the hunting of an animal which is often said to resemble a dinosaur (but which appears to be labelled &amp;quot;crocodile&amp;quot; in Greek).]] &lt;br /&gt;
** Engravings in the floor of Carlisle Cathedral appear to be of dinosaurs.  They are on the tomb of bishop Richard Bell, who died in 1496.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See picture on page 241 of Batten, Don, et. al., 2007, ''The Creation Answers Book''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Creatures matching dinosaurs and similar creatures have been described by various people groups.&lt;br /&gt;
** The description of the &amp;quot;[[Thunder bird]]&amp;quot; of [[American Indian]]s matches the descriptions of [[pterosaur]]s.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Today&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Descriptions of [[dragon]]s are widespread and match descriptions of dinosaurs, showing that dragons were real creatures and were actua very likely dinosaurs.&lt;br /&gt;
** The World Book Encyclopedia states that: &amp;quot;The [[dragon]]s of legend are strangely like actual creatures that have lived in the past. They are much like the great reptiles [dinosaurs] which inhabited the earth long before man is supposed to have appeared on earth.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quoted in [http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/FAQ25.html What about the Dinosaurs?], ''CreationScience.com''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  Dragons exist in the folklore of many European and Asian cultures.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;WB2000&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''Dragon'' entry in World Book Millennium 2000 CD ROM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  World Book Encyclopedia says, &amp;quot;In Europe, dragons are traditionally portrayed as ferocious beasts that represent the evils fought by human beings.  But in Asia, especially in China and Japan, the animals are generally considered friendly creatures that ensure good luck and wealth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref Name=&amp;quot;WB2000&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
** Dragons appear in the flag of [[Wales]], in traditional [[China|Chinese]] New Years' Day celebrations, and in the Chinese [[calendar]].  Every other creature on the calendar is a real creature.&lt;br /&gt;
* That dinosaurs are not known from the fossil record above the [[Cretaceous]] strata is not reason to believe that they have not survived until more recent times.&lt;br /&gt;
** Living specimens of orders of animals that were believed to have been extinct for millions of years have been found before, such as the Diatomyidae Squirrel &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Diatomyidae]] Squirrel [http://news.softpedia.com/news/They-Thought-It-Went-Extinct-11-Million-Years-Ago-19557.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the Wollemi Pine &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wollemi Pine ''Biotechnology Australia'' [http://www.biotechnologyonline.gov.au/enviro/wollemi.cfm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the [[Coelacanth]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sulawesi Coelacanth. ''University Of California, Berkeley''[http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/vertebrates/coelacanth/coelacanths.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;More on the Coelacanth ''marinebio.org''[http://marinebio.org/species.asp?id=54]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
*Some believe the [[Loch Ness Monster]] to be a [[Plesiosaur]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The recent dinosaur tissue find is a strong rebuttal of the claim that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carl Wieland, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3042 Still soft and stretchy], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- The Coelacanth are from a group that had previously been thought to have rudimentary limbs and so be the ancestor of land creatures, but this idea was dropped when living Coelacanths were discovered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/coelacanth.html Coelacanth: the world’s oldest fish?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Biologists see this as merely a minor adjustment to the story of evolution. --&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dinosaurs and birds ====&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science shows that the idea that birds are descendants of dinosaurs is not demonstrated by the evidence &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/3833/106/ Bird evolution?], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andy McIntosh, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/540/ 100 years of airplanes—but these weren’t the first flying machines!], ''Creation'' vol. 26 No. 1 p. 44&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and that the dinosaur-bird connection is even disputed by some evolutionists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his article, &amp;quot;Fifteen ways to refute materialistic bigotry&amp;quot;, Dr. [[Jonathan Sarfati]] wrote regarding dinosaurs being descendants of birds:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|“The same logic applies to the dinosaur-[[bird]] debate. It is perfectly in order for creationists to cite [[Alan Feduccia|Feduccia]]’s devastating criticism against the idea that birds evolved ‘ground up’ from running dinosaurs (the cursorial theory). But the dino-to-bird advocates counter with equally powerful arguments against Feduccia’s ‘trees-down’ (arboreal) theory. The evidence indicates that the critics are ''both'' right — birds did not evolve either from running dinos or from tree-living mini-crocodiles. In fact, birds did not evolve from non-birds at all!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jonathan Sarfati, [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/2610 15 ways to refute materialistic bigotry], ''Creation Ministries International''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science also cites the evolutionist and [[atheism|atheist]] [[Ernst Mayr]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthews, Michael, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/1208mayr.asp 99 and still fighting God], 8th December, 2003 (Answers in Genesis).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who stated the following:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|“It must be admitted, however, that it is a considerable strain on one’s credulity to assume that finely balanced systems such as certain sense organs (the eye of vertebrates, or the bird’s feather) could be improved by random mutations.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebook/ReferencesandNotes10.html In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood], ''Center for Scientific Creation''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Find the full quote on [http://books.google.com/books?id=mAIjnLp6r_MC&amp;amp;pg=PA296&amp;amp;lpg=PA296&amp;amp;dq=Ernst+Mayr+1942+%22It+must+be+admitted,+however,+that+it+is+a+considerable+strain+on+one%27s+credulity+to+assume%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=TRDzBtumPF&amp;amp;sig=XwvnT327A9sn3Uvs0RLOaQNo5Zo&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=P6H6Te37LMSwhAf03fimAw&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=1&amp;amp;ved=0CBUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false], starting from line 6. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The March 2003 issue of ''Scientific American'' is also cited by creation scientists:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Of all the body coverings nature has designed, feathers are the most various and the most mysterious...The origin of feathers is a specific instance of the much more general question of the origin of evolutionary novelties--structures that have no clear antecedents in ancestral animals and no clear related structures (homologues) in contemporary relatives. Although evolutionary theory provides a robust explanation for the appearance of minor variations in the size and shape of creatures and their component parts, it does not yet give as much guidance for understanding the emergence of entirely new structures, including digits, limbs, eyes and feathers....&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Matthews, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2003/0313sciam.asp Scientific American admits creationists hit a sore spot], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=000CD7F6-B16F-1E41-89E0809EC588EEDF Which Came First, the Feather or the Bird?], ''Scientific American''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science also shows that the comparative anatomy analysis done by evolutionists comparing bird bones and dinosaur bones is flawed. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dr. David N. Menton, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2005/0328discovery.asp &amp;quot;Ostrich-osaurus&amp;quot; Discovery?], ''Answers in Genesis''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Evolutionary/Old Earth Perspective===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:PzMyers2.jpg|thumbnail|251px|right|There is excellent evidence that dinosaurs and man coexisted.  During a visit to the [[Creation Museum]], the evolutionist and [[atheism|atheist]] [[PZ Myers]] had noticeably greater difficulty than others climbing on and off a dinosaur model due to the fact that he was overweight and out of shape.[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQQl2TMrgbM VIDEO] See also: [[Atheism and obesity]] and [[Evolutionists who have had problems with being overweight and/or obese]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;(photo obtained from [http://www.flickr.com/photos/reuvenim/4426093513/ Flickr], see [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/deed.en  license agreement])&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The view of [[atheism|atheists]], evolutionists  and others who accept the uniformitarian timescale is that dinosaurs existed on earth from 230 million years ago to 65 million years ago. In this view, the entire population of dinosaurs were wiped out by a mass extinction event (usually thought to be a meteorite) about 65 million years ago.&lt;br /&gt;
This precludes humans and dinosaurs co-existing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Extinction====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to evolutionists, close to 65 million years ago, at the end of the [[Cretaceous]] period, and the beginning of what is called the [[Tertiary]] period, an event occurred which has come to be known as the [[K-T Event]].  This event would have obliterated most life on Earth, plunging the world into something that would now be likened to global nuclear winter, through which few extant species could survive.  Although these scientists dispute the nature of the K-T Event (selecting among any number of catastrophes that could have caused the significant global cooling that resulted), most find that the claimed K-T Event was caused by the collision of a massive asteroid with the Earth, the dust and debris from which would have shrouded the sky for thousands of years, cooling Earth considerably.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kevin O Pope, &amp;quot;Meteorite impact and the mass extinction of species at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary,&amp;quot; Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, available at [http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/95/19/11028]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  According to this view, the dinosaurs did not survive this cataclysm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/08/0823_020823_asteroid.html Prehistoric Asteroid &amp;quot;Killed Everything&amp;quot;], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A layer of rock containing high concentrations&amp;lt;!-- &amp;quot;High&amp;quot;, or just &amp;quot;higher than normal&amp;quot;? --&amp;gt; of [[Iridium]], a metal that is extremely rare on earth but common in asteroids, is said to be due to the vaporization and then fall of dust from the meteorite's impact, and its compression within the subsequent geological record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Ibid''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;The evidence of a large impact crater can be found in rocks of the [[Yucatán]] Peninsula of the supposed age of this layer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/03/0307_030307_impactcrater.html &amp;quot;Dinosaur-Killer&amp;quot; Asteroid Crater Imaged for First Time], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/education/events/cowen1b.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Creationists assert that the assumptions underpinning the methods used by modern geologists are incorrect, and even though the validity of a large impact is accepted, this does not consitute proof that the impact caused the extinction of the dinosaurs&amp;amp;mdash;although the abundance of dinosaur fossils in rocks found higher in the rock layers than the impact is drastically less than their abundance in rocks lower down.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====An Explosion of new species ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evolutionists speculate that a mass extinction of the dinosaurs removed a major food competitor, and predator, of smaller animals.  As a result of a new &amp;quot;vacancy&amp;quot; in the food chain, following the [[K-T Event]], it is theorized that vast speciation occurred, as the evolutionary pressure of a new cold age propelled animal species to adapt or die out.  According to this view, [[mammals]] were some of the main beneficiaries of this explosion: their fur allowed them to adapt to the cold, and their small size allowed them to conserve energy relative to the huge dinosaurs of the previous age.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bennet, Shostak, Jakotsky, &amp;quot;Life in the Universe,&amp;quot; viewable at [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Universe-Jeffrey-Bennett/dp/0805385770]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Dinosaurs and Birds====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a number of feathered fossils (claimed to be dinosaurs) have been discovered, and evolutionary scientists claim the similarity in the bone structure between birds and dinosaurs show that modern birds are a descendants of dinosaurs.  This is often cited as an example of [[macroevolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/10/1006_041006_feathery_dino.html New Dinosaur Discovered: T. Rex Cousin Had Feathers], ''National Geographic''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Dinosaur fossils and Human Fossils and Geological Strata ==&lt;br /&gt;
Some evolutionary scientists assert that if human bones aren’t found with dinosaur bones, then dinosaurs and man didn’t live together.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hodge, Bodie, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v1/n1/humans-and-dinosaurs If humans and dinosaurs lived together, why don’t we find human fossils with dinosaur fossils?] ''Answers'' 1(1):52, May 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CH/CH710.html Claim CH710] (The TalkOrigins Archive)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Creation scientists point out that this is a false assumption; if human bones aren’t found buried with dinosaur bones, it simply means they weren't buried together.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Evolutionists speculate that [[radiometric dating]] of rocks containing dinosaur bones indicates them to have formed between 65 million years ago and 250 million years ago, whereas rocks with human bones in them are dated as being much newer (less than 5 million years old). Creation science shows that those methods of dating rocks provide false results, and therefore reject this argument.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://creation.com/radiometric-dating-questions-and-answers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Creation science points out that the fossil record contains mainly marine organisms and that a small sliver of the fossil record contains vertebrates and thus shows that we shouldn't expect to find many human fossils at all.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, as the biblical [[Great Flood|Flood]] would be a marine catastrophe, it would be expected that marine fossils would dominate the fossil record.  This is in fact what we find.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NAB&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hodge, Bodie, [http://www.answersingenesis.org/PublicStore/pdfs/SampleChapter/10-2-267.pdf Why Don’t We Find Human &amp;amp; Dinosaur Fossils Together?] (chapter 13 of the New Answers Book), 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Approximately 70% of the Earth is covered in salt water which would also explain the dominance of marine fossils. In addition, creation scientists show there may have been a small pre-flood human population and that massive amounts of flood sediment are why we haven’t found human fossils in pre-biblical flood sediments.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NAB&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Also, creation scientists point out that we don't find human bones buried with [[coelacanth]]s yet humans and coelacanths coexist today.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HaD&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''[[Saurischia]]''===&lt;br /&gt;
Herbivorous species were almost all quadrupedal.  They carried peg-like teeth which cut, rather than chewed, plant material; grinding of food was aided by gastroliths.  Carnivorous species were exclusively bipedal. &lt;br /&gt;
*Sauropoda&lt;br /&gt;
::Species of this infraorder are characterized by long necks and tails, barrel-shaped bodies, and column-like legs.  In three families (notably Diplodocidae, Brachiosauridae, and Titanosauroidea) there are species which are of extreme size, in excess of 125 feet in length and 100 tons, making them the largest animals to have walked the earth.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Apatosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Brachiosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ultrasaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Seismosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Argentinosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Diplodocus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Theropoda&lt;br /&gt;
::Exclusively bipedal; forearms meant for grasping or holding.  Fossil evidence for several species indicate pack hunting. &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Coelophysis]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ornithomimus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Allosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Tyrannosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Deinonychus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Velociraptor]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Giganotosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===''[[Ornithischia]]''===&lt;br /&gt;
Species of this group were all herbivorous; most were quadrupedal.  Front teeth were lacking, while a predentary bone was present in the front of the lower jaw.  Several species (mainly within ''Ceratopsia'') had a distinctive parrot-like beak.&lt;br /&gt;
*Ceratopsia&lt;br /&gt;
::Species of this infraorder carried one or more horns on their heads, as well as a shield-like frill to protect the neck.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Triceratops]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Pachyrhinosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Torosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Protoceratops]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Styracosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*Stegosauria&lt;br /&gt;
::Large dinosaurs with a row of bony plates on top of their backs, and several spikes used as a defensive weapon at the end of their tails.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Stegosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Huayangosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Kentrosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*Ankylosauria&lt;br /&gt;
::Heavily-armored dinosaurs, some with a row of spikes along each side, and possessing a bony tail club.&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Ankylosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Euoplocephalus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Edmontonia]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
*Ornithopods&lt;br /&gt;
::Large, herd-dwelling dinosaurs that could run bipedaly.  Several species had a &amp;quot;boss&amp;quot; of bone on their heads (Pachycephalosaurs) which may have been used for head-butting similar to bighorn sheep; others a crest of bone (hadrosaurs) which may have been sound resonators. &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Camptosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Iguanodon]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Pachycephalosaurus]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Parasaurolophus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Edmontosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Bactrosaurus]]''&lt;br /&gt;
:::''[[Maiasaura]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== In Popular Culture ==&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs have been a fixture of popular culture since their discovery. It is theorized that some of the myths of fantastical creatures stem from the accidental discovery of dinosaur fossils. More recently, dinosaurs have featured in popular stories including books, movies, television, video games, even music.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dinosaurs were introduced to a wide modern audience when movies like the Jurassic Park series were released.&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Theory of Evolution and Cases of Fraud, Hoaxes and Speculation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Irreligion and superstition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Young earth creationism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==	 &lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Dinosaurs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dufrane</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>