<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Drubg</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Drubg"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Drubg"/>
	<updated>2026-10-10T19:32:10Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&amp;diff=1354213</id>
		<title>Fox News Channel</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fox_News_Channel&amp;diff=1354213"/>
		<updated>2017-06-15T23:37:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drubg: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:FNC logo.jpg|right|175px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Fox News Channel''' is a [[United States]] [[cable]] and [[satellite]] [[news]] channel that claims to be &amp;quot;fair and balanced&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;we report, you decide,&amp;quot; while sometimes actually promoting [[feminism]] and the [[homosexual agenda]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americansfortruth.com/2013/08/16/americas-survival-special-report-documents-fox-news-growing-pro-homosexual-bias/ Documentation of intense pro-[[homosexual]] bias at the Fox News Channel]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is a 24-hour general news service covering breaking news as well as political, business and entertainment news.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fox News Channel heavily promotes [[RINO Backers]]—commentators who may appear to be [[conservative]] but side with [[RINO]]s just when it matters most.  In the first major [[2016 presidential debate]], [[feminist]] [[Megyn Kelly]] of Fox News ambushed [[Donald Trump]] with irrelevant, out-of-context quotations to make it appear that he was somehow anti-women.  Additional examples on Fox News include [[Bill O'Reilly]], [[Sean Hannity]], [[Karl Rove]], and [[Rush Limbaugh]], who savaged [[Todd Akin]] for making a [[pro-life]] statement pointing out that pregnancy from rape is rare due to feminine biology.  The Fox News Channel gave Karl Rove a platform to raise money against [[pro-life]] Republican candidates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even pundit [[Sarah Palin]] is too [[conservative]] for Fox News Channel, as when it canceled some of her interviews at a key political moment in August 2012,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/08/sarah-palin-fox-cancelled-my-interviews-133729.html|title=Sarah Palin: 'Fox canceled my interviews'|date=August 29, 2012|first=Dylan|last=Byers|work=[[Politico]]}} and then refused to renew her contract at the end of 2012. Fox negotiated a new contract five months later but generally pushed her off the air.&amp;lt;ref name=politico&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/sarah-palin-fox-news-contributor-92747.html|title=Sarah Palin rejoins Fox News|date=June 13, 2013|first=Mackensie|last=Weinger|work=[[Politico]]|accessdate=July 18, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Fox News Channel heavily favors [[neoconservatives]] and is particularly weak in criticizing the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[abortion]].  The Fox News Channel often helps elect less conservative [[Republican]]s, as when it repeatedly featured and promoted [[John McCain]] and [[Chris Christie]] while excluding their more [[conservative]] primary opponents.  It drifted further from the [[Conservative Movement|conservative movement]] by petulantly declaring that [[conservative]] [[Newt Gingrich]] would not be accepted back.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/04/ailes-newt-cant-come-back-to-fox-120421.html|title=Ailes: Newt can't come back to Fox|date=April 13, 2012|first=Alexander|last=Burns|work=[[Politico]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, because it is much more conservative than the rest of the mainstream media, Fox News has been fiercely opposed and targeted by liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harper, Jennifer (May 25, 2017). [http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/25/inside-the-beltway-the-strategic-war-on-fox-news/ Inside the Beltway: The strategic war on Fox News]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved May 25, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Founding==&lt;br /&gt;
The Fox News channel was started in 1996 by [[Rupert Murdoch]] and [[Roger Ailes]], who perceived a need for a news organization that offered more balanced and fair reporting, one where the facts from all sides would be presented. [[Mainstream media]] &amp;quot;[[political correctness]]&amp;quot; was banished. As an example, Fox News [[anchor]]s call [[terrorist]]s what they are, (terrorists), instead of referring to them as &amp;quot;militants.&amp;quot;  As of February, 2007, polls show that over 20% of Americans say their main source of news is the Fox News Channel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News has dominated the ratings of other cable news outlets.&amp;lt;ref name=anderson&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-anderson4oct04,0,2195035.story?coll=la-opinion-center|title=Fox News: Enraging Liberals for 10 Years|date=October 4, 2006|first=Brian C.|last=Anderson|work=[[Los Angeles Times]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Launched by media tycoon Rupert Murdoch and former political consultant Roger Ailes as a refuge for viewers fed up with real or perceived [[liberal bias]] everywhere in the so-called &amp;quot;[[mainstream media]]&amp;quot;, Fox is the undisputed ratings champion of cable news.  It's been trouncing [[CNN]], [[MSNBC]] and [[CNBC]] for years, and draws a much larger audience share than all competitors, including the three major broadcast news shows, combined. It is by far the most profitable news network in the world, on track to earn more than $700 Million in 2010.&amp;lt;ref name=10ailes&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/business/media/10ailes.html?_r=0|title=A Fox Chief at the Pinnacle of Media and Politics|date=January 9, 2010|first1=David|last1=Carr|first2=Tim|last2=Arango|work=[[The New York Times]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But the profit motive may cause some of the hostility Fox News has to the [[conservative]] positions on important social issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed, for over 100 consecutive months, FNC has been the most-watched cable news channel in the country. FNC is available in more than 90 million homes. It is part of the Fox Television Stations Group, a subsidiary of [[Australia]]n-born media mogul [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s [[News Corporation]]. [[Roger Ailes]] was named Chairman of the Fox Television Stations Group on August 15, 2005. Ailes resigned on July 21, 2016, following a lawsuit alleging sexual harassment of female employees.  Rupert Murdoch is his interim replacement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/roger-ailes-resigns_us_57912e0ee4b0fc06ec5c4c8a|title=Roger Ailes Steps Down As Fox News CEO After Widespread Accusations Of Sexual Harassment|date=July 21,2016|accessdate=July 21, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fair and Balanced==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fair_balanced.jpg‎|thumb|left|Fair And Balanced Logo]]&lt;br /&gt;
According to a May 2017 study conducted by [[Harvard University]] regarding mainstream media coverage of Republican U.S. President [[Donald Trump]], overall 80% of coverage about him was negative throughout the media.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FoxFairBalanced&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Valerie (May 19, 2017). [http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/19/study-trump-press-coverage-new-standard-negativity/ Harvard agrees: Trump press coverage sets ‘new standard for negativity’]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved May 19, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Shaw, Adam (May 19, 2017). [http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/05/19/study-93-percent-cnn-nbcs-trump-coverage-negative/ Study: Media Coverage of Trump’s First 100 Days Set ‘New Standard For Negativity’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 19, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the network with the most positive coverage of Trump was Fox News, with 48% percent positive and 52% negative.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FoxFairBalanced&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; This shows that despite [[liberal deceit]], Fox is indeed the fairest and most balanced mainstream news network in the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The slogan===&lt;br /&gt;
From its foundation, Fox News had the slogan of &amp;quot;Fair and Balanced.&amp;quot; In June 2017, it was reported that Fox would discontinue the slogan in an effort to distance itself from [[Roger Ailes]], who created the slogan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nussbaum, Daniel (June 15, 2017). [http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/06/15/fox-news-dropping-fair-balanced-slogan/ Fox News Dropping ‘Fair and Balanced’ Slogan]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal criticism of the slogan===&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the facts above, liberal critics have still complained about Fox's &amp;quot;Fair &amp;amp; Balanced&amp;quot; slogan.  Former President [[Bill Clinton]] exploded at ''Fox News Sunday'' anchor [[Chris Wallace]] in September 2006, accusing him of &amp;quot;a nice little conservative hit job&amp;quot; after being lightly pressed by Wallace about his record on fighting [[Al Qaeda]]. Democratic politicians and advocates have relentlessly attacked the cable network, sometimes accusing it of being a Republican [[propaganda|propaganda mill]].  Former Vice-President and environmentalist [[Al Gore]] has likened Fox to a right-wing &amp;quot;[[fifth column]].&amp;quot;  Groups, such as [[MoveOn.org]], funded a classic [[schlockumentary]] entitled ''Outfoxed'', which purports to expose the channel's 'nefarious Republican agenda'.  Some have referred to FOX News as &amp;quot;the propaganda arm of the Republican Party&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Faux News.&amp;quot; In a grandstanding gesture of political theater the group unsuccessfully petitioned the [[Federal Trade Commission]] to stop Fox's from using its slogan as &amp;quot;deceptive advertising&amp;quot;. It was unanimously rejected.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.showbizdata.com/news/36127/FTC-REJECTS-COMPLAINTS-AGAINST-FOX-NEWS  FTC: &amp;quot;It's best to ignore nuts&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fox News spokesman Rob Zimmerman told today's (Tuesday) Wall Street Journal: &amp;quot;If they can attack Fox News to this extreme, ''then all news organizations are at risk to be targeted by similar attacks. ... It's best to ignore nuts.&amp;quot;'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rolling Stone magazine charged that Ailes has “built the most formidable propaganda machine ever seen outside of the [[Communist]] bloc.” Ailes responded accusing [[NBC]], [[CBS]], [[ABC]], [[The New York Times]], and the rest of running a [[liberal]] [[propaganda]] machine. {{cquote| If they did fair and balanced news, we’d be out of business.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A recent comprehensive study by [[UCLA]] political scientist Tim Groseclose and University of Missouri-Columbia economics professor Jeffrey Milyo found [[Brit Hume]]'s ''Special Report'' — Fox's most straightforward news show — more centrist than any of the three major networks' evening newscasts, all of which are liberal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20120605223731/http://rcp.missouri.edu/articles/milyo_media.html MU researcher finds most mainstream media contain liberal bias]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The program is a model of smart news television. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although it is true that Fox's opinion shows (as opposed to its news shows) are, as they're supposed to be, frequently bombastic and opinionated; it is equally true that Fox's biggest super-star, [[Bill O'Reilly]] is not a mainstream Republican, but a registered [[Independent]] who sides with conservatives. He regularly charges the oil companies with price-gouging and attacks big business for quashing the little guy. Greta Van Susteren's politics are unclear, as she mostly covers the [[crime]]-of-the-day stories. [[Geraldo Rivera]] is traditionally liberal on most issues, with the exception of being a strong supporter of the military and stiff penalties for [[sex offender]]s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some liberal commentators, such as news analyst [[Marvin Kalb]], and [[Eleanor Clift]], are affiliated with the channel. In general, Fox News is closer to mainstream America than [[CBS]], [[ABC]], [[NBC]] or [[CNN]], its founding mission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Criticism from conservatives===&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives have criticism for the Fox News Channel as well. For example, conservatives have complained about [[Fox News and homosexuality|how Fox News has covered the homosexuality issue]]. In 2006, the [[conservative]] reporter [[Peter LaBarbera]] wrote that &amp;quot;Fox News and Wal-mart are among the high-level ($10,000) sponsors of the [[National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association]]’s (NLGJA) 2006 Convention in Miami.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americansfortruth.com/issues/corporate-promotion/corporations/food-beverage-household-brands/coca-cola HRC’s 195 100-Percent Pro-Homosexual Corporations]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, their 'Fair and Balanced' motto allows [[liberal propaganda]], lies, deceit, and half-truths to gain an audience. In reality, Fox was judged to actually provide a more &amp;quot;fair and balanced&amp;quot; coverage in the 2008 Presidential race than all three MSM networks, who had a decidedly pro-Obama tilt, a study by the ''Center for Media and Public Affairs''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20130309221616/http://www.cmpa.com/pdf/08summer.pdf Center for Media and Public Affairs: ''How TV News Has Covered McCain, Obama and Hillary'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Fox News Liberals ===&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News is accused of being blatantly biased towards the right, during its supposedly non-partisan news reports. These false accusations stem from alleged injection of opinion in news stories, selectively preventing liberals a chance to be represented on the channel, and support for high ranking Republican Party members. Opponents to this theory cite the fact that Fox News parent company News Corp. overwhelmingly donates campaign contributions to Democrats&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/fox-news-parent-company-funneling-money-to-dems/|title=Fox News parent co. funneling money to Dems? (Top Donors: Clinton v. Obama, Wall Street Journal)|date=July 22, 2013|first=Andrew|last=Zahn|work=[[WND]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is the 9th biggest fundraiser of the Clintons, estimated at $3 million over 23 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/st_CLINTONvOBAMA20140702.html|title=Top Donors: Clinton v. Obama|date=July 2, 2014|work=[[Wall Street Journal]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Fox News network employs the following [[liberal]]s among others:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Juan Williams]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alan Colmes]] (deceased)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Kirsten Powers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dennis Kucinich]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Shepard Smith]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Geraldo Rivera]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mara Liasson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bill Schulz]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Susan Estrich]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Santita Jackson]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Simon Rosenberg]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Howard Kurtz]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Meghan McCain]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bob Beckel]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 2009 national survey showed that 46% of those who watch FOX News “just about every day” are [[Democrat]]s or Independents. [[Dick Morris]] interpreted the numbers and determines, ''&amp;quot;Could it be that the [[Obama Administration]] is concerned about FOX News not because it is 'an arm of the Republican Party' but because it is so widely seen among Democrats and Independents?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.dickmorris.com/blog/fox-news-reaches-across-party-lines/|title=FOX NEWS REACHES ACROSS PARTY LINES|date=October 19, 2009|first=Dick|last=Morris|work=[[Dick Morris]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ratings Dominance ==&lt;br /&gt;
For 17 consecutive years, until 2017, Fox News was the #1 cable news station in the U.S. for primetime, and even after the consecutive record was broken, it remained #1 overall.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kew, Ben (May 22, 2017). [http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/05/22/fox-news-slips-to-third-place-among-key-demographic-for-first-time-in-17-years/ Cable News Ratings Shock: Fox Slips to 3rd Place in Primetime for First Time in 17 Years]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It continued to easily beat the opposition even in a period of upheaval in early- and mid-2017.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harper, Jennifer (June 6, 2017). [http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/6/inside-the-beltway-believe-it-fox-news-tops-the-ra/ Believe it: Fox News tops the ratings]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''[[Bill O'Reilly|The O'Reilly Factor]]'' was #1 on cable news for 15 consecutive years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Katz, A.J. (December 28, 2017). [http://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/2016-ratings-fox-news-channel-is-cable-tvs-most-watched-network/315009 2016 Ratings: Fox News Channel is Cable TV’s Most-Watched Network]. ''TVNewser''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; O'Reilly was forced out from Fox in April 2017.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Elber, Lynn (April 20, 2017). [https://www.usnews.com/news/entertainment/articles/2017-04-20/oreilly-is-out-at-fox-but-influence-endures-career-too O'Reilly Is Out at Fox but Influence Endures; Career Too?]. ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News Channel was the 2nd highest rated cable channel on all of television during the first quarter of 2009 in prime time Total Viewers. CNN was 17th and MSNBC 24th for the first three months of the year. FNC beat CNN and MSNBC combined and gained the most compared to the first quarter of 2008, up 24%.  2009's first quarter was FNC's 3rd highest rated quarter in prime time in the network's history — just behind Q4 '08 and Q3 '05. In prime time, ages 25–54 demo, and in total day in both categories, FNC grew more year-to-year than CNN and MSNBC combined. FNC had nine of the top 10 programs on cable news in Total Viewers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Glenn Beck]] dominated the ratings before leaving the network in June 2011. Beck broke every single record for the 5 P.M. time slot. The leftist mob learned to hate him with a passion and [[Center For American Progress]]' senior fellow [[Van Jones]] is taking credit for Beck's retirement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
April 2009 statistics showed three new programs beat CNN and MSNBC ''combined'' in total viewers during their respective time slots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Record with Greta Van Susteren was up 55% in total viewers and 75% in the demo. Your World with Neil Cavuto is up 60% in Total Viewers and 102% in the demo. Glenn Beck was up 212% in the demo and up 128% in total viewers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/april_ratings_fnc_beats_cnn_and_msnbc_combined_115179.asp Media Bistro: April Ratings: FNC Beats CNN and MSNBC Combined]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fox News Canada ==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals have successfully painted Fox News as being blocked in [[Canada]] because of laws against lying, the premise is false. While they don't operate in Canada because of the legal tactics of direct competitor and wholly-owned government entity [[CBC|Canadian Broadcasting Corporation]] (CBC), Fox News does broadcast their channel by selling programs to Canadian third party independent media firms like Bell, Rogers and 20 other companies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150101090541/http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,184837,00.html|title=Where in the World is FOX?|first=Brian C.|last=Anderson|work=Fox News}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-elitist ==&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives argue that Fox's real ethos is not Republican or conservative, but anti-[[elitist]] — a major reason it connects with so many Americans and annoys so many coastal elites. &amp;quot;There's a whole country that elitists will never acknowledge,&amp;quot; Ailes once observed. &amp;quot;What people resent deeply out there are those in the 'blue states' thinking they're smarter.&amp;quot;  This anti-elitism shows itself in Fox's pro-U.S. stance in covering the [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq war]]s and its broadcasters' use of terms such as &amp;quot;terrorist&amp;quot; instead of the politically correct &amp;quot;militant&amp;quot; to refer to terrorists. Since the [[Vietnam War]] era, mainstream [[journalist]]s have tended to see such blunt language and side-taking as unsophisticated, a betrayal of journalistic [[objectivity]], or perhaps their own ingrained biases against government in general.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another aspect of Fox's anti-elitism is the treatment of [[evangelical]] and [[fundamentalist Christian]]s with respect, far from the normal liberal media's depiction as lunatics or extremists. &amp;quot;We regularly have on the Rev. Franklin Graham, [[Dr. James Dobson]] and other religious leaders, just as we put on Pat Ireland and Eleanor Clift,&amp;quot; Ailes said, continuing,  ''&amp;quot;Most Americans believe in God and have that as their foundation in life. So why shouldn't we have as guests people that they like, respect and want to hear from?&amp;quot; '' Ailes said he didn't get &amp;quot;too worked up&amp;quot; by a Pew Foundation study that showed that Fox has more Republican viewers than CNN, CNBC or MSNBC and that his reporters and anchors insert their opinions into stories far more than competitors do. Numbers might have something to do with it: Fox is beating the combined audience of the other three. But Ailes dismissed Pew as a &amp;quot;liberal [[lobbyist|lobbying]] organization.&amp;quot; He said, &amp;quot;Most polls today are not taken to provide information to the public but to get press for the organization taking the polls. I took a poll of Pew, and 98% of my organization found that they were biased&amp;quot;, Ailes said with a wink.&amp;lt;ref name=usatoday&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.usatoday.com/life/columnist/mediamix/2005-04-06-media-mix_x.htm|title=Fox News' Ailes takes jab at competitors, blasts 'biased' polls|date=April 6, 2005|first=Peter|last=Johnson|work=[[USA Today]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response, Project Director Tom Rosenstiel said the study &amp;quot;was not a poll. It was a content analysis designed by a four-university research team and executed at the [[University of Alabama]].&amp;quot; ''One plus for Fox, he said, was that researchers found Fox News stories were more forthcoming about sourcing than their cable rivals.''&amp;lt;ref name=usatoday /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Fringe views versus Fox News ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What really frustrates liberals about Fox, though, is simply that, along with [[talk radio]] and the conservative [[blogosphere]], it has helped shatter the left's near-monopoly on news and information. Fox's opinion-driven programming gives conservatives and liberals a chance to get a fair hearing for their ideas. But Democratic politicians and activists who go on Fox also must defend their views, often against tough questioning, something that happens less often on the networks, where most journalists are left-of-center, survey after survey has shown&amp;quot;, said columnist Brian Anderson. &amp;quot;Even more significant, Fox came on the scene a decade ago as a professional news organization that could define and report news as something different from what the elite consensus says it is. To take one of many examples, the corruption of the [[United Nations]]' oil-for-food initiative in [[Iraq]], initially downplayed by the mainstream media because of their sympathy for internationalism, was uncovered — deemed newsworthy — on Fox.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this wouldn't matter if Fox News wasn't so influential. But it is. According to the Pew Research Center, more than 20% of Americans now claim to get news from it, and lots of them (37%) are Democrats or independents. The network's success has also sparked a &amp;quot;Fox effect,&amp;quot; leading some competitors to become more open to right-of-center opinions: MSNBC's &amp;quot;Scarborough Country,&amp;quot; hosted by former Republican congressman [[Joe Scarborough]], is a prime example. Until a few years ago, Democrats never had to deal with all these conservatives in the media.&amp;lt;ref name=anderson /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ailes said Fox News has no agenda. His charge to his reporters and anchors is simple: &amp;quot;If you make a mistake, get on the air as fast as you can and admit it. ... Do your homework. Make sure you reach out to a point of view you don't agree with to be sure you have some balance in your piece, because journalists, despite the public perception, are not empty-headed fools. They actually come to the job with some ideas and biases.&amp;quot; When asked whether the media have a &amp;quot;conscious bias,&amp;quot; Ailes said: &amp;quot;I don't know whether it's conscious or not. I think people who are biased to the left and right are by and large honest people who bring their life experience to whatever their beliefs are. I don't think there's some conspiracy of bias to the left, ''but I do think that [[New York]] and [[Los Angeles]] have different views than many people that I know from other parts of the country.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref name=usatoday /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Obama Administration versus Fox News ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Hussein Obama]] has thin skin when it comes to criticism of his policies. The entire [[mainstream media]] has thrown its support to Obama and refuses to questions his policies. Fox News is the lone station that will criticize Obama fairly. Obama said,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/media_critic_fox_news/2009/06/19/227121.html|title=Media Critic: Fox Only Press Doing Its Job|date=June 19, 2009|work=[[NewsMax]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|  “I’ve got one television station that is entirely devoted to attacking my administration... That’s a pretty big megaphone. You’d be hard pressed if you watched the entire day to find a positive story about me on that front.” }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The President has praised MSNBC and berated Fox News.  Considering that MSNBC devoted itself to attacking George W Bush and his administration, this is hypocritical on Obama's part.  To sum it up, all other major news networks have let themselves become servile heralds of the liberal agenda, while Fox news is the only station that will call Obama out on anything he does.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Media critic David Zurawik said “Thank goodness at least one TV outlet, Fox, is questioning Team Obama as it pushes for the kind of massive change in American life not seen since the era of Franklin Roosevelt,” and &amp;quot;...ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNBC and the others allow their news operations to be used by the White House for partisan political reasons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fox News versus Conservatives==&lt;br /&gt;
Popular opinion programming is skewed in favor of voices from establishment Republican, [[RINO]] members. This is most evident with their guest speakers such as [[Karl Rove]]. You'll never hear Fox use the words liberal Republican or RINO. The most liberal members of the Republican party are labeled moderates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/26/paul-make-key-stop-in-maine-with-state-gop-split-between-libertarians-and/?intcmp=latestnews|title=Paul makes key stop in Maine, with state GOP split between libertarians and establishment|date=April 26, 2014|work=Fox News|quote=Paul has helped fellow Republicans across the political spectrum raise money, as he is expected to do Saturday for Maine Sen. Susan Collins, who is widely considered a moderate.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Fox News will occasionally follow stories about the [[Tea Party|Tea Party movement]] however they prefer to air the liberal side prominently, airing outright lies from liberals. [[Rush Limbaugh]] claimed Fox News wouldn't let him talk about immigration issues and preferred to control the narrative, also known as [[censorship]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/02/rush-limbaugh-accuses-fox-news-of-trying-to-censor-him-quite-telling/|title=Rush Limbaugh Accuses Fox News of Trying to Censor Him: ‘Quite Telling’|date= July 2, 2013|first=Jason|last=Howerton|work=[[The Blaze]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Republican RINO leadership such as [[John McCain]], [[Lindsey Graham]] and others love the spotlight of a camera and Fox News is there for them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News makes sure to hammer conservative guests. In September 2013, Fox's Chris Wallace claimed that establishment Republicans gave him opposition research against conservative [[Ted Cruz]] in his fight to defund [[Obamacare]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://weaselzippers.us/2013/09/22/foxs-chris-wallace-republicans-feeding-me-opposition-research-against-ted-cruz/ Fox’s Chris Wallace: Republicans Feeding Me Opposition Research Against Ted Cruz, WeaselZippers.com, September 22, 2013]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wallace has refused calls for him to release names. Nearly every host and guest, with the exception of [[Sean Hannity]] and [[Laura Ingraham]], spread the establishment surrender message that the GOP can't win the defunding fight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the aftermath for the November 5th, 2013 race for governor, many Fox articles speak about RINO [[Chris Christie]] and the implications of his victory. Nothing at all about [[Ken Cuccinelli]] being abandoned by the establishment D.C. GOP despite a strong focus from talk radio. Cuccinelli almost pulled off the upset victory, yet no Fox coverage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After David Brat knocked off House Majority Leader [[Eric Cantor]], Fox News commentators took to the air with glum faces of disbelief and dour reactions. Brit Hume said the David Brat win will help Democrats and hurt the GOP.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://twitchy.com/2014/06/10/brit-hume-says-dave-brat-win-will-hurt-gop-without-immigration-reform/ Brit Hume says Dave Brat win will hurt GOP without immigration reform, Twitchy.com, June 10, 2014]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The news all over the conservative sphere talks about how the GOP used voter fraud, lies, and Democrats, in a Republican primary runoff to defeat [[Chris McDaniel]] in [[Mississippi]]. Fox News gave the controversy barely a mention the day after and nothing since. This despite story after story of fraud, race-baiting robocalls and fliers unearthed. One county with 1,000 illegal ballots cast and 9 other counties refusing the McDaniel campaign from looking at the voter books.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many speakers gave the [[CPAC]] 2015 crowd a strong conservative message. Yet the 'Latest News' on Fox is Jeb Bush's CPAC speech. A favorite of Beltway establishment Republicans/lobbyists but the least conservative at the conference.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Roger Ailes ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rogerailes_1.jpg‎|thumb|right|400px|Roger Ailes, Fox News CEO]]&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,205966,00.html This is a transcript] of Ailes speaking to the Television Critics Association, which will be enlightening to readers digging into the Fox take on reporting and its reaction to controversy about its mission.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 20, 2008, [[Roger Ailes]], who held the titles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, FOX News and Chairman of FOX Television Stations, signed a new five-year contract with News Corporation, it was announced by Rupert Murdoch, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The contract will pay him over 23 million dollars in 2009.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/roger_ailes_signs_new_5year_deal_with_news_corp_101312.asp Ailes Inks 5 Year Deal With NewsCorp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Ailes' time with [[News Corporation|News Corp]], [[FNC]] passed [[CNN]] in ratings in all day parts in 2002 to become the number one news network in the country, nearing full distribution with more than 90 million subscribers. In 2007, he launched the [[Fox Business Channel]] which currently reaches more than 40 million homes and served as the biggest launch in cable television history. Throughout Mr. Ailes' tenure, FOX Television Stations has increased its market share each of the last three years with all-time record shares in the last two years. In addition, Fox Television Stations has expanded its local news presence by nearly 100 hours a week in a challenging economic climate.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|At a time when the broadcast networks are struggling with diminishing audiences and profits in news, he has built Fox News into the profit engine of the News Corporation. ''Fox News is believed to make more money than CNN, MSNBC and the evening newscasts of NBC, ABC and CBS combined.'' The division is on track to achieve $700 million in operating profit this year, according to analyst estimates&amp;lt;ref name=10ailes /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a December 2013 interview by Hollywood Reporter, Ailes was talking about MSNBC no longer being in the news business and then said, &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| For [[CNN]] to also throw in the towel and announce they’re out of the news business is quite interesting.}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This upset rival CNN President [[Jeff Zucker]] greatly and he lashed back that the GOP runs Fox News.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://townhall.com/news/politics-elections/2014/01/10/zucker-gop-being-run-from-fox-news-headquarters-n1777255|title=Zucker: GOP being run from Fox News headquarters|date=January 11, 2014|work=[[Townhall]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an April 2015 interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Ailes said&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.aim.org/don-irvine-blog/fox-news-chairman-ailes-were-competing-with-tnt-usa-and-espn-not-cnn-or-msnbc/|title=Fox News Chairman Ailes: &amp;quot;We’re Competing with TNT, USA and ESPN,&amp;quot; not CNN or MSNBC|date=April 8, 2015|first=Don|last=Irvine|work=[[Accuracy In Media]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| I flip to MSNBC occasionally to make sure their blind pig didn’t find an acorn. But they never have once.}} and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| I don’t watch much CNN, they got out of the news business in primetime. But I look to see if they have a good documentary or movie. If they do, I’ll watch that.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Tony Snow ==&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2006 the G. W. Bush [[White House]] selected [[Tony Snow]], Fox News Anchorman, to be the new White House Press Secretary. &amp;quot;Snow, who in his roles as a [[pundit]] on Fox News and elsewhere has rapped Bush on several occasions, joined the White House only after extracting a promise that he would become an adviser to the president on day-to-day strategy...the former columnist will be the first outsider to become part of Bush's revamped inner circle.&amp;quot;, said the [[Washington Post]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/26/AR2006042600558.html|title=Snow Pick May Signal Less Insular White House|date=April 27, 2006|first=Jim|last=VandeHei|work=[[Washington Post]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to being White House Press Secretary, Snow, was the host for ''Fox News Sunday, with Tony Snow'' and as host of his own radio talk show. He was a director of speech-writing for President [[George H.W. Bush]] and has worked as a [[USA Today]] columnist, Editorial Page Editor of the [[Washington Times]], deputy editorial page editor of the [[Detroit News]] and frequent substitute for radio host [[Rush Limbaugh]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2006/04/20060426.html|title= President Announces Tony Snow as Press Secretary |date=April 4, 2006|work=[[The White House]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Snow died July 12, 2008, at age 50 after an unsuccessful battle with colon cancer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bill O'Reilly==&lt;br /&gt;
The [[O'Reilly Factor]] had been the most watched cable news program, until O'Reilly was fired from Fox News on April 19, 2017, due to alleged sexual harassment. O'Reilly has interviewed Barack Obama and other high-profile guests on his show.&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;FOX News destroys NBC and CNN on cable every night. We cover the news. We don't ignore it. And we don't denigrate it.&amp;quot; - Bill O'Reilly&lt;br /&gt;
Bill O'Reilly is a registered independent, but sides with Republicans on most issues, excluding several Christian causes.  Bill O'Reilly wrote the best seller &amp;quot;A Bold Fresh Piece of Humanity.&amp;quot; Like [[Sean Hannity]] and other commentators on Fox, O'Reilly's role was that of an independent contractor, expressing his own opinions, not those of Fox News, as opposed to the networks news anchors, like Shepard Smith.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Five ==&lt;br /&gt;
The show that replaced Glenn Beck's ratings dominance is 'The Five', described as a “roundtable ensemble of five rotating FOX personalities....&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/30/fox-news-to-replace-beck-with-the-five/|title=Fox News to Replace Beck With ‘The Five’|date=June 30, 2011|first=Brian|last=Stelter|work=[[The New York Times]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most often, the show pits Bob Beckel, a consistent defender of every [[Liberal style|Democrat Party talking point]], against a panel of conservative or libertarian opponents. 'The Five' features [[Bob Beckel]], [[Greg Gutfeld]], [[Juan Williams]] (who also generally liberal positions), [[Dana Perino]], [[Jesse Watters]], and [[Kimberly Guilfoyle]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sarah Palin==&lt;br /&gt;
The network confirmed in January 2010 that the former [[Alaska]]n governor [[Sarah Palin]] had signed a multiyear contract to appear on the news station periodically. Potentially in a format similar to LtCol (ret) Oliver L. North's &amp;quot;War stories&amp;quot; documentary series.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/11/sarah-palin-to-contribute-to-fox-news/?scp=2&amp;amp;sq=Palin&amp;amp;st=cse|title=Sarah Palin to Contribute to Fox News|date=January 11, 2010|first=Jim|last=Rutenberg|work=[[The New York Times]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Palin left in January 2013 looking to take her message to a &amp;quot;larger audience&amp;quot;, but returned as a political commentator under a new contract in June 2013.&amp;lt;ref name=politico/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Red Eye==&lt;br /&gt;
''Red Eye'' is a hybrid news / comedic satire show hosted by Thomas Shillue, who replaced [[Greg Gutfeld]], who moved on to his own program. The show appears on Fox News at 3:00&amp;amp;nbsp;a.m. EST on weekdays. Their ratings are remarkable for the time slot.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.mediaite.com/online/red-eye-resurgence-more-demo-viewers-watch-fox-at-3am-than-cnn-at-8pm/|title=Red Eye Resurgence: More Demo Viewers Watch Fox At 3am Than CNN at 8pm|date=October 5, 2009|first=Steve|last=Krakauer|work=[[Mediaite]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
The ratings came out for September and ''Red Eye'' is up over 30% in total viewers and up 50% in the key demo (25-54) since July. They have more overall viewers than every CNBC show, every MSNBC show that is on before Hardball, most of HLN, and American Morning on CNN.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
September 2010 was the third anniversary of ''Red Eye'' and it was noted that their rating for 3:00&amp;amp;nbsp;a.m. EST beat out [[CNN]], &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|This time, the show had better ratings in the A25-54 demographic than Campbell Brown at 8pmET and Larry King at 9pmET, and tied Anderson Cooper at 10pmET (Monday-Thursday).}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fox News Channel and Homosexuality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Fox News and homosexuality]] and [[Homosexuality in the media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Currently, the Fox Broadcasting Company website declares concerning the [[National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association]] (NLGJA):&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|NLGJA Annual Conference and Job Fair&lt;br /&gt;
Fox News is a regular exhibitor at these annual Job Fairs.  News Corp sponsored the opening reception for first-time attendees in 2006, as well as sponsoring workshops on Journalism in various colleges in 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.fox.com/diversity/outreach/lgbt.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010, the [[National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association]] declared that [[Kelly Wright]], a Fox News Channel representative, attended NLGJA's 15th Annual New York Benefit.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nlgja.org/news/NYE2010.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According the Fox News Channel website: &amp;quot;Kelly Wright is co-anchor of &amp;quot;FOX &amp;amp; Friends Weekend&amp;quot; as well as a general assignment correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=Wright&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/personalities/kelly-wright/bio/#s=r-z|title=On Air Personalities: Kelly Wright|work=Fox News}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wright is a graduate of the [[Christian]] university [[Oral Roberts University]].&amp;lt;ref name=Wright /&amp;gt; In January 2010, the [[pro-life]] website published by Jill Stanek claimed Kelly Wright is a pastor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.jillstanek.com/pregnancy/foxs-kelly-wrig.html|title=Fox’s Kelly Wright, product of rape|date=January 19, 2010|first1=Susie|last1=Allen|first2=Jill|last2=Stanek|work=[[Jill Stanek]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  According to [[Christianity]] and the [[Bible]], [[Homosexuality and the Bible|homosexuality is a sin]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Rev. Louis P. Sheldon Photo.jpg|thumb|Reverend [[Louis Sheldon]] of the [[Traditional Values Coalition]] ]] &lt;br /&gt;
The [[Traditional Values Coalition]] states the following regarding the Fox News Channel and the issue of [[homosexuality]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The [[National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association]] has hundreds of members and is heavily funded by Hearst newspapers, Knight-Ridder, [[CBS News]], [[CNN]], Gannett, [[NBC]], [[Los Angeles Times]], [[Fox News]], and more. Major newspapers throughout the U.S. have homosexual activists on their staffs who filter what you read about homosexuality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.traditionalvalues.org/pdf_files/Homosexuality101.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Accuracy in Media]] had this to say about the Fox News Channel:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Media organizations which underwrote the convention included NBC News, Times Inc., Turner Broadcasting, Knight-Ridder, the Washington Post and Fox News Network. That’s right - Fox News. This is supposed to be a conservative network. ABC, NBC, CBS, the New York Times, and USA Today all sent recruiters to the event, to hire open gays as journalists. Fitzpatrick comments, &amp;quot;By treating the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association as a legitimate counterpart to black and Hispanic journalists’ associations, these media organizations showed that they agree with the notion that homosexuals, a group defined by behavior rather than immutable characteristics, constitute a bona fide minority.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ghroll.blogspot.com/2008/03/homosexuality-in-media.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Bill O'Reilly and the homosexuality issue ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''see also:'' [[Bill O'Reilly and the homosexuality issue]] and [[Homosexuality in the media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[American Family Association]] reported the following in regards to [[Bill O'Reilly]] who host the O'Reilly Report which is a popular program on the Fox News Channel:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|On February 11, 2004, Bill O'Reilly, host of The O'Reilly Factor on the Fox News Channel, featured Kevin Jennings, the executive director of GLSEN (the Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network.) Jennings, a former teacher turned homosexual activist, along with a lesbian counterpart, discussed GLSEN's new pro-homosexual curriculum on marriage being marketed to children and youth in public schools all across America under the guise of &amp;quot;tolerance.&amp;quot;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
O'Reilly, watched heavily by conservatives and Christians alike, shocked much of his constituency on September 3, 2002, when he publicly announced his support of homosexual rights in the nation's largest “gay” publication, ''The Advocate''. His sympathetic, lenient views on “gay” adoption and his mixed-message stance on “gay” marriage have caused great dissent among his loyalists - and no doubt cost him viewers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.afa.net/homosexual_agenda/GetArticle.asp?id=115&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[WorldNetDaily]] stated the following regarding O'Reilly and his exchange with the [[Ex-Homosexuals|ex-homosexual]] and evangelical minister Stephen Bennett:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Fox News is threatening to sue a prominent evangelical minister in the ex-homosexual movement who engaged in a volatile exchange over biblical morality on the top-rated television program &amp;quot;The O'Reilly Factor&amp;quot; in September. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stephen Bennett, who says he left his homosexual lifestyle nearly 11 years ago, has distributed a 60-minute audio tape program called the &amp;quot;The O'Reilly Shocker,&amp;quot; in which he responds to host Bill O'Reilly's characterization of people who take the Bible literally as &amp;quot;religious fanatics.&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bennett said he has received hundreds of e-mails from viewers of the segment who said they were outraged at O'Reilly's &amp;quot;anger and verbal abuse.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.wnd.com/2003/01/16542/|title=Fox News threatens to sue ex-'gay' minister|date=January 3, 2003|first1=Art|last1=Moore|work=[[WND]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to the threatened lawsuit of the Fox News Channel the Agape Press reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|But Mike DePrimo, senior litigation counsel for the American Family Association Center for Law &amp;amp; Policy, which represents Bennett, says Bennett has a right to distribute a recording of the program -- and that his use of the tape is legal under copyright law's allowance of fair use and comment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The law provides that even copyrighted material may be used, provided it's used not for commercial gain but for comment,&amp;quot; DePrimo says. &amp;quot;Stephen Bennett used the material from the O'Reilly show simply to rebut the arguments O'Reilly put forward.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The attorney implied there may be another reason the popular O'Reilly wants the distribution of the tape stopped -- and it has to do with image. &amp;quot;O'Reilly promotes himself as a [[conservative]],&amp;quot; DePrimo explains. &amp;quot;In fact, Bennett's tape shows that O'Reilly is simply another media elite who's advancing the [[Homosexual Agenda|homosexual agenda]] -- and he doesn't want to be exposed for what he is.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/1/afa/32003a.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bill O'Reilly describes himself as a practicing [[Roman Catholic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.billoreilly.com/newslettercolumn?pid=29184|title=The Catholic Quandary|date=April 1, 2010|work=[[Bill O'Reilly]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to the [[Vatican]] individuals should not engage in homosexual acts as they are acts of serious depravity.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;vatican.va&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20030731_homosexual-unions_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Peter LaBarbera Concerning Fox News and homosexuality ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Homosexuality in the media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Peter.jpg|right|thumb|150px|[[Peter LaBarbera]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2009, [[Peter LaBarbera]] of [[Americans for Truth]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|How fascinating that [[Wayne Besen]] (left) is given the opportunity to appear on FOX News, of all places..., to critique alleged “[[homophobia|homophobic]]” attitudes and speech toward homosexuals — when he has such a well-deserved reputation for being one of the nastiest “queer” activists in the business.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://americansfortruth.com/news/gays-hating-ex-gays-wayne-besens-verbal-assault-on-greg-quinlan.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2009, [[Peter LaBarbera]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Temple U. Professor Dr. Marc Lamont Hill  (left), a frequent guest on FOX News, believes Americans are “[[homophobia|homophobic]]” because most still don’t like to see homosexuality (compared to heterosexuality) on TV or the big screen. We say Prof. Hill should get off his liberal high horse and stop lecturing Americans for their normal reaction to unnatural and immoral behavior....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enough already. Gay sex is wrong, [[Homosexuality and health|unhealthy (especially between men)]], and my hunch is it’s still pretty off-putting to most FOX viewers who are honest with themselves. And that’s OK. But I’ll go further: if there is a growing acceptance of homo-sexual behavior, especially among young people, that’s not a good thing but a sign of America’s descent into decadence, and our departure from a transcendent Judeo-Christian moral code that has served this nation well.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://americansfortruth.com/news/were-all-homophobes-now-letter-to-foxs-red-eye.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006, [[Peter LaBarbera]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Fox News and Wal-mart are among the high-level ($10,000) sponsors of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association’s (NLGJA) 2006 Convention in Miami (Sept 7-10 at Loew’s Miami Beach Hotel). Every year, the NLGJA garners hundreds of thousands of dollars in Big Media sponsorships for its convention; this year it appears (based on the sponsorship list below) that the total is around half a million dollars in corporate support...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Our question for Fox News executives is: if you are truly “fair and balanced,” will you now give an equal and corresponding grant to Americans for Truth or another pro-family organization, say, Accuracy in Media, that counters the ubiquitous pro-”gay” spin in the media? We’ll be awaiting your answer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://americansfortruth.com/issues/corporate-promotion/corporations/food-beverage-household-brands/coca-cola&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rupert Murdoch ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:HillaryRupert1V.jpg|right|thumb|200px|Hillary Clinton with media magnate Ruppert Murdoch.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;''Photo Courtesy Democrats Against Hillary''.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://democratsagainsthillary.blogspot.com/ ''Democrats Against Hillary''].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Fox News Channel is a [[United States]] [[cable]] and [[satellite]] [[news]] channel. It is part of the Fox Television Stations Group, a subsidiary of [[Australia]]n-born media mogul [[Rupert Murdoch]]'s [[News Corporation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Slated reported in 2008 that since 1997, [[Republicans]] have received a slight majority - 56% of the $4.76 million in campaign donations from the Murdoch family and the [[News Corporation]]'s political action committees and employees.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slate.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2196085/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  However, [[Slate]] also reported in 2008: &amp;quot;Since Democrats won control of Congress in the 2006 elections, the company and its employees have given more than twice as much to [[Democrats]] as to [[Republicans]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;slate.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;   Generally speaking, [[Republicans]] have less favorable views and policies concerning homosexuality than [[Democrats]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.gallup.com/poll/137357/Four-Moral-Issues-Sharply-Divide-Americans.aspx|title=Four Moral Issues Sharply Divide Americans|date=May 26, 2010|work=[[Gallup Poll]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Pew Research Center reported in 2010: &amp;quot;In broad terms, voters view the Democratic Party's ideology as the opposite of the Republican Party's: 58% say the Democratic Party is either very liberal or liberal...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.people-press.org/2010/07/16/voters-rate-the-parties-ideologies/|title=Voters Rate the Parties’ Ideologies|date=July 16, 2010|work=[[Pew Research Center]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the United States, twice as many liberals as conservatives (46% versus 22%) believe people are born homosexual and [[Views on Homosexuality|liberals generally have more favorable opinions about homosexuality]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=764&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In recent years, Rupert Murdoch has formed a relationship with the [[liberal]]s/[[Democrats]] [[Bill Clinton]] and [[Hillary Clinton]]. In 2005, he invited musician [[Bono]] and Bill Clinton to a company conference on the environment, [[Islam]] in the West, and future of the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/54/biz_06rich400_Keith-Rupert-Murdoch_639W.html|title=#32 Keith Rupert Murdoch|date=September 21, 2006|work=[[Forbes]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Knighthood by Roman Catholic Organization and Roman Catholic teaching on homosexuality ===&lt;br /&gt;
Rupert Murdoch has been married three times and divorced two times. Before Rupert Murdoch left his second wife, he was anointed as a member of the Pontifical Order of St. Gregory the Great, for his &amp;quot;unblemished character.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://weeklywire.com/ww/01-20-98/alibi_opinion.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Roman Catholic Church]]'s position is that having homosexual desires can be a choice in individuals but having homosexual desires is not a choice in respect to all individuals.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;vatican.va&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, as noted earlier, according to the [[Vatican]] individuals should not engage in homosexual acts as they are acts of serious depravity.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;vatican.va&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Roger Ailes]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fox Television and Religion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Fox News and homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill O'Reilly and the homosexuality issue]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Homosexuality in the media]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[21st Century Fox]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James Murdoch]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.foxnews.com/ Fox News official website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Further reading===&lt;br /&gt;
*Pinkerton, James P. (April 22, 2017). [http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/04/22/pinkerton-trump-nation-fox-nation-fox-news-roger-ailes-bill-oreilly/ Pinkerton: Before Trump Nation, There Was Fox Nation: Fox News After Roger Ailes and Bill O’Reilly]. ''Breitbart News''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fox News Channel]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cable TV Networks]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexual Agenda]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drubg</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Megyn_Kelly&amp;diff=1354212</id>
		<title>Megyn Kelly</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Megyn_Kelly&amp;diff=1354212"/>
		<updated>2017-06-15T23:36:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drubg: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:megyn kelly.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Megyn Kelly''' (born November 18, 1970), is a [[feminist]] featured by the [[Fox News Channel]] until she finally left in early January 2017.  She has virtually no experience in journalism and wears ridiculous false eyelashes, and yet accuses others (such as [[Donald Trump]]) of supposedly being sexist.  She falsely implied that her first husband cheated on her, which he categorically denied, and which he said that she later apologized to him for.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2938070/I-wanted-wife-wanted-wife-Ex-husband-Megyn-Kelly-speaks-marriage-FOX-News-star-reveals-didn-t-CHEAT-bugged-hinted-did-air.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In her interview of [[Vladimir Putin]] to be aired in early June 2017, Ms. Kelly dressed inappropriately, particularly in light of how she accuses others of being sexist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
She insisted that she &amp;quot;was good at&amp;quot; practicing law, &amp;quot;but it didn’t make me happy.&amp;quot;  With little experience in journalism and virtually no familiarity with the [[conservative movement]], she first became a talking head at Fox News as a daytime anchor on its &amp;quot;America Live&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;America’s Newsroom.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/08/07/who-is-megyn-kelly-the-woman-on-the-receiving-end-of-donald-trumps-ire/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010, she gave an interview to Howard Stern that could be considered more offensive than remarks made by [[Donald Trump]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Until early January 2017, she hosted ''The Kelly File'', and appeared in the December 2010 issue of ''GQ'' magazine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theblaze.com/stories/foxs-megyn-kelly-makes-gq-appearance/ FOX’S MEGYN KELLY MAKES REVEALING GQ APPEARANCE, TheBlaze.com, November 19, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Divorced and remarried, she works at Fox News despite having three young children and plenty of money not to work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Role in the 2016 GOP Debate ==&lt;br /&gt;
In the first [[GOP]] [[2016 presidential debate]], she stridently attacked [[Donald Trump]] on issues irrelevant to national policy.  Trump responded by observing that Megyn Kelly &amp;quot;is totally overrated and angry.  She really bombed tonight&amp;quot; at the debate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-fox-news-megyn-kelly-frank-luntz-debate-2015-8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the debate Megyn Kelly also asked [[Scott Walker]] a question biased with a pro-[[abortion]] slant:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|... Would you really let a mother die rather than have an abortion? And with 83% of the American public in favor of a life exception, are you too out of the mainstream on this issue to win the general election?}}&lt;br /&gt;
Following the debate, Scott Walker explained that &amp;quot;'it’s a false choice' ... the life of the mother vs. life of the child proposition, and [[pro-life]] experts agreed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://liveactionnews.org/scott-walker-informs-megyn-kelly-abortion-not-necessary-to-save-mothers-life/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Donald Trump]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/megyn-kelly/ Official Fox News Biography]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Kelly, Megyn}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fox News Channel]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Broadcasters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lawyers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Moderates]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drubg</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=James_Webb&amp;diff=1354211</id>
		<title>James Webb</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=James_Webb&amp;diff=1354211"/>
		<updated>2017-06-15T23:35:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drubg: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Jim Webb&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Webb official color 144.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=Barbara Samorajczyk (div.)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Jo Ann Krukar (div.)&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Hong Le Webb&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Protestant]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Virginia&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2007 - January 3, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[George Allen]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Tim Kaine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''James &amp;quot;Jim&amp;quot; Webb, Jr.''' (born 1946) is a former [[United States Senator]] from [[Virginia]] and a member of the [[Democratic Party]]. He briefly served as Secretary of the Navy under President [[Ronald Reagan]] from 1987-1988. Webb is a graduate of the [[United States Naval Academy|U.S. Naval Academy]], and a decorated [[Vietnam War]] veteran.  He did not seek reelection to the Senate in 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/142979-sen-webb-wont-seek-another-term-in-2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was succeeded by another Democrat, [[Tim Kaine]] who was the Democratic candidate for Vice President in 2016.  Webb returned to his prior career as an author and journalist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 2, 2015, Webb announced his candidacy for the Democratic nomination in the [[2016 presidential election]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/07/02/democrat-jim-webb-joins-2016-white-house-racee complained about not receiving a fair share of time in the early televised debates and dropped out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2006 Senate campaign==&lt;br /&gt;
On February 7, 2006, Webb announced that he would seek the Democratic nomination for the 2006 Senate race against one-term incumbent Virginia Senator [[George Allen]]. He won the Democratic primary by a 53%-47% margin in a race with a low voter turnout. The contest with Allen turned largely on Allen's controversial personality and identity. Allen's used the word &amp;quot;macaca&amp;quot; to insult one of Webb's campaign workers, and it backfired. On November 7 Webb narrowly defeated Allen and was elected to a six-year term in the U.S. [[Senate]]. Analysts argue that Virginia was rapidly changing from a Republican stronghold to a competitive state. Black voters (85%-15%) voted for Webb over Allen. The black vote proved decisive in Webb's victory since Webb lost the white vote 41%-58%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vote returns from [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/VA/S/01/epolls.0.html CNN Exit Poll]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Naval Academy controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Webb has been the subject of many controversies. During his Senate campaign a group female graduates of the United States Naval Academy accused him of fostering an air of hostility and harassment towards them within the academy. In a 1979 article by Webb, entitled &amp;quot;Women Can't Fight&amp;quot;, he said he had never met a woman &amp;quot;whom [he] would trust to provide those men with combat leadership&amp;quot;, while he was serving in the Vietnam War. He said of Bancroft Hall, a dorm at the Naval Academy that has 4,000 males and 300 females, was &amp;quot;a horny woman's dream.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://george.loper.org/archives/2006/Sep/9597.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After his appointment as United States Navy Secretary, Webb referred to [[military]] women as &amp;quot;thunder thighs.&amp;quot; After Webb retired, [[President Reagan]] wrote that &amp;quot;I don't think the Navy was sorry to see him go.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nybooks.com/articles/21530&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Exchange with President Bush==&lt;br /&gt;
On November 28, 2006, at a White House reception for those newly elected to Congress, Senator-Elect Jim Webb refused to have his picture taken with [[Republican]] President [[George W. Bush]]. The President asked Webb &amp;quot;How's your boy?&amp;quot;, referring to his son, a Marine serving in Iraq. Webb replied &amp;quot;I'd like to get them out of Iraq, Mr. President.&amp;quot; Bush responded, &amp;quot;That's not what I asked you. How's your boy?&amp;quot; Webb responded, &amp;quot;That's between me and my boy, Mr. President.&amp;quot; Webb was so angered by the exchange that he was reportedly tempted to &amp;quot;slug&amp;quot; the president. He later said &amp;quot;I'm not particularly interested in having a picture of me and George W. Bush on my wall.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States Senator==&lt;br /&gt;
On January 4, 2007, Webb was accompanied by Senator [[John Warner]] (R-VA) and sworn in to the United States Senate by Vice President [[Dick Cheney]]. Webb currently serves on the Committee on Foreign Relations, Committee on Armed Services, Committee on Veterans Affairs, and the Joint Economic Committee. On January 23, 2007, Webb delivered the Democratic response to the President's State of the Union address and threatened to &amp;quot;show President Bush the way.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Webb lead a successful bipartisan effort to improve veterans' benefits.  Webb also sought to establish an independent commission to study criminal justice reform which gained widespread bipartisan support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Webb was frequently mentioned as a possible Vice President running mate for fellow Senator [[Barack Obama]] in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
==2016 Presidential Election==&lt;br /&gt;
Webb declared as a candidate for President and appeared in early television debates.  He dropped out before the first primary, with speculation that he would make a third party bid for President.  On February 11, 2016, he ruled out making an independent presidential bid.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;rulesout&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web | url=http://www.cbsnews.com/news/former-sen-jim-webb-rules-out-independent-presidential-bid/ | title=Former Sen. Jim Webb rules out independent presidential bid | publisher=[[CBS News|CBSNews.com]] | date=February 11, 2016 | accessdate=February 27, 2017 | author=Shabad, Rebecca}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On March 4, 2016, Webb stated that he would not vote for [[Hillary Clinton]] in the 2016 presidential election, but he declined to rule out voting for [[Donald Trump]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | url=http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/jim-webb-no-hillary-clinton-220255 | title=Jim Webb: I won't vote for Clinton, but I may for Trump | work=[[Politico]] | date=March 4, 2016 | accessdate=Feburary 27, 2017 | author=Collins, Eliza}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
Jim Webb's ancestors were officers in the [[Confederate]] army.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10994.html , POLITICO Webb's rebel roots: An affinity for Confederacy, June 10, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He maintains that &amp;quot;Most Southern soldiers viewed the driving issue to be sovereignty rather than slavery.&amp;quot; He said &amp;quot;Love of the Union was palpably stronger in the South.&amp;quot;  That doesn't make sense to the majority of  people. Many detractors consider his statement sovereignty to continue slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
March 26, 2007, an aide of Jim Webb, Phillip Thompson carried a concealed firearm into the Senate building. Routine scanning of briefcases turned up a loaded pistol and two loaded clips. He was immediately arrested by Capitol Police.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2007/042007/04282007/279797 , AP Webb aide's gun charge dropped by prosecutor, April 28, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charges against the aide were dismissed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/James_Webb.htm Webb On the Issues]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://web.archive.org/web/20160505042219/https://www.webb2016.com/ Jim Webb 2016 campaign website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Webb, Jim}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Virginia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:110th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:111th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:112th United States Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2016 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drubg</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nazi_Party&amp;diff=1354209</id>
		<title>Nazi Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Nazi_Party&amp;diff=1354209"/>
		<updated>2017-06-15T23:34:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drubg: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{PoliticalParty&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_name = National Socialist German Workers' Party&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_logo =[[Image:Flag of Nazi Germany.png|center|thumb|upright]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | website = &lt;br /&gt;
 | leader = [[Adolf Hitler]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | Parleader = Anton Drexler&lt;br /&gt;
 | foundation = 1920&lt;br /&gt;
 | ideology = [[Fascism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[National Socialism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | position = ''Fiscal'': [[Socialism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Social'': [[Leftists]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | international = &lt;br /&gt;
 | colors = red, black, white and brown&lt;br /&gt;
 | footnotes =&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--[[Image:Flag of Nazi Germany.png|thumb|200px|'''The flag of Nazi Germany''' featuring the notorious reverse swastika]]--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Nazi Party''' ('''NSDAP''', formally the ''Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei'' or in English ''National Socialist German Workers' Party''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Nazi&amp;quot; comes from the first word in the party's name, '''Na'''tionalso'''zi'''alistische.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) was a [[totalitarian]] movement and [[political party]] in [[Germany]] from 1920-1945. It was controlled after 1921 by [[Adolf Hitler]]. In 1933 the Nazis came to national power in Germany and took control of the government and most sectors of Germany's society and economy. The Nazi regime in Germany 1933-45 called itself the '''[[Third Reich]]'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The German ''Drittes Reich'' means &amp;quot;Third Empire&amp;quot;, after the [[Holy Roman Empire]] of 900-1806 and the [[German Empire]] of 1871-1918.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis rearmed Germany, started [[World War II]] in Europe, conquered its neighboring countries, murdered between 5.5 and 6 million Jews and an additional five million non-Jewish victims in the [[Holocaust]] and was finally destroyed by the [[Allies]] (the [[United States]], [[Britain]] and the [[Soviet Union]], along with smaller countries) in 1945. Like Hitler, the Nazis have since become synonymous with evil in the modern world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite being called National Socialist, Hitler condemned the Soviet Union and Communism, and after rising to power, outlawed Germany's Communist Party and imprisoned and executed Communists, as he saw the Communists as a rival to the Nazis for control of the far-Left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://web.archive.org/web/20080410211317/http://constitutionalistnc.tripod.com/hitler-leftist/ Hitler was a Leftist]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hitler advocated a form of fascism, and in fact, the National Fascist Party, an Italian political party, led by Hitler's future ally, Benito Mussolini, at the same time, had similar policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Foundations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Adolf Hitler]]  exploited the myth of the &amp;quot;Stab in the Back,&amp;quot; the belief that the [[World War I]] had been lost because &amp;quot;disloyal&amp;quot; elements within Germany – [[Jews]] and [[Marxism|Marxists]] – had undermined the war effort. As [[William Shirer]] put it in ''The Rise and Fall of the [[Third Reich]]'', &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;To him, as to almost all Germans, it was 'monstrous' and undeserved. The German army had not been defeated in the field. It had been stabbed in the back by the traitors at home.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus emerged for [[Hitler]], as or so many Germans, a fanatical belief in the legend of the 'stab in the back' which, more than anything else, was to undermine the Weimar Republic and pave the way for Hitler’s ultimate triumph.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=rise&amp;gt;''The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich'', Book One, &amp;quot;The Rise of Adolf Hitler&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The origin of the Nazi Party was a small group originally called the &amp;quot;Committee of Independent Workmen&amp;quot;, founded by a toolmaker and locksmith named [[Anton Drexler]] in 1918. It had been set up in reaction to the [[Marxism]] of the free trade unions.&amp;lt;ref name=rise /&amp;gt; A year later in January 1919, Drexler's group merged with another group, the &amp;quot;Political Workers' Circle&amp;quot; to form a new party known as the &amp;quot;German Workers' Party&amp;quot; (''Deutsche Arbeiterpartei'' or DAP).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shoah Resource Center, http://www1.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%20Word%20-%205946.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Germanculture.com, http://www.germanculture.com.ua/library/weekly/aa012400b.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Adolf Hitler joined the DAP in September 1919 and was put in charge of propaganda in early 1920. Hitler transformed this small group into what we now know as the Nazi Party through his great skill in politics and public speaking. In February 1920, the words &amp;quot;National Socialist&amp;quot; were added to the party name and it became the &amp;quot;National Socialist German Workers' Party&amp;quot; (''Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei'' or NSDAP).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McNab, Chris (2009). ''The Third Reich''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is proof that the Nazis were [[liberal]], despite liberals' claims otherwise. The Storm Troopers (''Sturmabteilung'', [[Brownshirts|SA]]) in their distinctive brown uniforms, were organized first to keep order and kick out hecklers at Nazi meetings, then to break up the meetings of other parties and to protect Nazi Party meetings. The ''hakenkreuz'' (literally: &amp;quot;hooked cross&amp;quot;), or [[swastika]], was adopted as the party’s symbol which was used in their blood red flag. In July 1921, Hitler became party chairman, and declared himself leader (''Führer'') of the party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McNab, (2009). ''The Third Reich''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Here we have the core of Nazism: (i) a very strong dose of German anti-semitism (with a paranoid belief in a conspiracy between Jewish financiers who control the capitalist economy and steal from the Germans, Jewish liberal intellectuals who preach humanism and enfeeble the Germans, and Jewish communists who seek to enslave the Germans; (ii) a belief in the German nation and the &amp;quot;aryan&amp;quot; German race as an entity with a special, heroic destiny; (iii) war as the ultimate test of national strength and worth; and (iv) conquest—with extermination or removal of the resident population—to create more &amp;quot;living space&amp;quot; for the German people and larger fields for the German farmers. Add to this (a) the &amp;quot;leadership principle&amp;quot; (''Führerprinzip'') --a hatred of parliamentary institutions, and a belief that a good political order sees an inspired leader giving people vision and commands (rather than see parliamentarians haggle and compromise on behalf of interest groups)--(b) the use of terror to obtain obedience, and (c) the desire to make sure that all of society's organizations serve the national cause, and you have Nazism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://econ161.berkeley.edu/TCEH/Slouch_Alternatives12.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anti-Semitism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis were highly [[Anti-Semitism|anti-Semitic]] and blamed the Jews for many of the problems in Germany, such as the defeat in [[World War I]]. &lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis passed the [[Nuremberg Laws]] in 1935 which stated that:&lt;br /&gt;
* Young German women could not work for Jews in the domestic services.&lt;br /&gt;
* Jews were no longer citizens of Germany (this meant that they had no protection from the police and so were susceptible to attack)&lt;br /&gt;
* Jewish doctors were not allowed to treat Germans/Aryans&lt;br /&gt;
* Jews could not marry Germans/Aryans&lt;br /&gt;
They made laws against Jews (&amp;quot;Rassengesetze&amp;quot;, ''race laws'') which places successively tighter restrictions on the rights of Jews to own property, use public services, live in some areas, enter public spaces and eventually required Jews to wear a [[Star of David]] on their clothing. &lt;br /&gt;
The Jews were mistreated, persecuted, and killed by the Nazis.  &lt;br /&gt;
The Nazi state also persecuted other political opponents, such as [[Jehovah's Witnesses]]. State-run hospitals secretly euthanized the very old, the sick, mentally ill and the disabled. Some [[homosexuality|homosexuals]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hans Peter Bleuel, ''Sex and Society in Nazi Germany'', (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1973).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; came under increasing scrutiny and persecution in the later years of the regime, although other homosexuals were ardent supporters of Adolf Hitler and played an important role in his regime.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whale.to/b/reisman.html The Pink Swastika as Holocaust Revisionist History by Judith A. Reisman]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
The Nazis exterminated at least 11 million civilians by rounding them up, transporting them to concentration camps and then murdering them there. About 6 million of these were Jews (see [[Holocaust]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler rejected Christianity as spoiled by Judaism, but did support a new pro-Nazi Protestant church that had some followers.  The German Army had traditionally used the phrase &amp;quot;Gott mit uns&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;God with us&amp;quot;, which was commonly used on their armor and helmets. By World War II it was still used on the army uniform belt-buckles. Hitler in the future, however, planned to minimize the influence of the Christian Protestant churches and Catholic churches, while promoting nationalism and pre-Christian German paganism. Adolf Hitler was raised Roman Catholic as a youth, but he began to despise the church and all of Christianity as too pacifist or a &amp;quot;religion for weaklings&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Alfred Rosenberg ===&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Alfred Rosenberg, the party's official philosopher, announced the philosophic basis of the Nazi campaign. In his ''The Myth of the Twentieth Century'' he scorns the Old Testament, and while he takes Jesus more seriously, he concludes,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Time (Sept 03, 1934)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
:The religion of Jesus was undoubtedly the preaching of love . . . but the German religious movement, which wishes to develop into a people's church, must declare that it unconditionally subordinates the ideal of neighborly love to the ideal of national honor . . . The churches, handed over to it again, will, little by little, put the fiery spirit of the hero . . . in place of the crucifixion.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The outspoken [[pagan]] Rosenberg drew up a thirty-point program for the ''National Reich Church'', created in 1936, which contains the following statements,   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The National Reich Church of Germany categorically claims the exclusive right and the exclusive power to control all churches within the borders of the Reich: it declares these to be national churches of the German Reich.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The National Church is determined to exterminate irrevocably...the strange and foreign Christian faiths imported into Germany in the ill-omened year 800...&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The National Church has no scribes, pastors, chaplains or priests, but National Reich orators are to speak in them.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The National Church demands immediate cessation of the publishing and dissemination of the Bible in Germany...'&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;On the altars there must be nothing but 'Mein Kampf' (to the German nation and therefore to God the most sacred book) and to the left of the altar a sword.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;On the day of its foundation, the Christian Cross must be removed from all churches, cathedrals and chapels...and it must be superceded by the only unconquerable symbol, the swastika.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shirer, ''The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich'', p. 240&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a Manchester Guardian correspondent attended a Berlin meeting of the German People's Church, he found it a noisy, enthusiastic, a theological free-for-all. One Dr. Krause exclaimed, &amp;quot;The lives and utterances of great Germans must be considered equal to the Bible as revelations...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Pagan cults ===&lt;br /&gt;
Throughout Germany strange little [[pagan]] cults were seen to arise, such as the pantheistic  Nordic Religious Community.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Youth Leader Hartmann-Lautenbacher stated,  &amp;quot;Besides the rock of Jesus Christ there is another: Adolf Hitler. It remains to be seen which of the two is stronger. On the one sit the old women. On the other stands the young generation.&amp;quot;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Youth Press Agent August Hoppe exhorted war against Christianity, and a return to [[pagan]] roots. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Similar to what some see today in the West, Youth Leader Joachim Benedicte stated, &amp;quot;...The religious faith of the German people must be decided by political elements, the Storm Troops and the Hitler Youth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Religion: Nazis v. Jesus Christ, Time. 9-03-1934&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As in Communism, the State, or ''Fatherland'' came to be deified, in the name of which Hitler justified his autocratic decision to kill - for political purposes - a large number of S.A. leaders while they were at a resort, during the &amp;quot;[[Night of the Long Knives]]&amp;quot; (June 30 to July 2, 1934).    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rather than initially attacking Christian faith outright, the Nazi Party deceitfully promoted itself as &amp;quot;positive Christianity,&amp;quot; and vigorously opposed what they call &amp;quot;negative Christianity&amp;quot;, both terms being Nazi inventions which could mean whatever the local Nazi leader chooses them to mean.  In their Manifesto of their &amp;quot;anxieties and fears&amp;quot;,  the German Evangelical Church quoted Rosenberg as saying, &amp;quot;The general ideas of the Roman and of the Protestant churches are negative Christianity and do not, therefore, accord with our soul.&amp;quot; The Manifesto concludes: &amp;quot;When, within the compass of the Nazi view of life, an anti-Semitism is forced on the Christian that binds him to hatred of the Jew, the Christian injunction to love one's neighbor still stands...The Evangelical conscience is most heavily burdened by the fact that there are still concentration camps in Germany that describes itself as a country in which Justice is administered...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Time magazine, Aug. 10, 1936, Foreign News: Churchmen to Hitler&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Religious persecution ===&lt;br /&gt;
Overall however, the spiritual condition of Germany may be seen to have been weak by and during the time of Hitler's rise to power. Protestant churches in Germany had become largely institutionalized, and its power to effect political change decreased. The Catholic Institution had been pressured into a concordant with Hitler, which the latter continually broke. Loyalties were torn as [[National Socialism]] became the cause, and churches were pressured to submit to its ethos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''A history of national socialism, Cross against Swastika'', by Konrad Heiden&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Pius XII and the Nazis'', by Darlene Shelton&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jews were overall seen negatively, stubborn and ungrateful.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Martin Luther and &amp;quot;The Jews&amp;quot; A Reappraisal'', by Dr. Christopher Probst&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After their rise to power the Nazis sought to purge the national German Evangelical Church of converted Jews, as well to make the church ideologically submissive to the state. By entertaining the Nazi doctrine of Aryan racial superiority and persecution of Jews, they militated against the authoritative position of the Scriptures. Largely in reaction to such the [[Confessing Church]] emerged. This Protestant church was not recognized by the Nazis, and was persecuted and finally forced underground, as many members and leaders, such as [[Martin Niemöller]], were particularly active in protesting against euthanasia and the persecution of the Jews.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, 2008; Confessing Church&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Encyclopædia Britannica, 2009, Confessing Church&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Measures taken against the Christian Churches were an integral part of National Socialism. An [[OSS]] report to the [[Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal]] Stated,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;The Nazi conspirators, by promoting beliefs and practices incompatible with Christian teaching, sought to subvert the influence of the Churches over the people and in particular over the youth of Germany. They avowed their aim to eliminate the Christian Churches in Germany and sought to substitute therefore Nazi institutions and Nazi beliefs and pursued a programme of persecution of priests, clergy and members of monastic orders whom they deemed opposed to their purposes and confiscated Church property.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Claire Hulme &amp;amp; Dr. Michael Salter, [http://www-camlaw.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/articles/RJLR_3_1_2.pdf ''The Nazi's Persecution as a War Crime: The OSS Response Within the Nuremeberg Trial's Process''], Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion, n.d.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Christians sometime hold Hitler to be an atheist, and atheists often assert he was a Christian, the best evidence shows him to be neither, in particular failing to be the latter, especially in the Biblical sense of the word (being both the source and most authoritative definition of it). In contrast, evidence reveals that while Hitler shared with many atheists a dramatically skewed idea of what Christianity is, and/or made political use of the term, he was quite the contrary to being a Christian.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.amazon.com/Hitler-Holocaust-Bible-Scriptural-Anti-Semitism/dp/0982277601 Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Bible:   A Scriptural Analysis..., by Joe Keysor]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The resource site Adherents.com states, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no question that Hitler was a Nazi. Nazism was clearly his most important religious affiliation, not in the positive way the word &amp;quot;religion&amp;quot; is often defined, but in the general sense that any philosophy or belief system which is most important in a person’s life is that person’s &amp;quot;religion,&amp;quot; regardless of whether or not it is universally labelled as a &amp;quot;religion.&amp;quot; Hitler was also born into a Catholic family, but he rejected Catholicism and in most ways he rejected Christianity in general. On occasion we have read people claim that &amp;quot;Hitler was a Catholic&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Hitler was a Christian&amp;quot; in a meaningful way, implying that Christianity or Catholicism was the primary impetus for his Nazi reign. Such claims are simply vitriolic attacks occasionally voiced by ideologically-inclined anti-Christian, anti-Semitic or pro-Nazi people. Historians agree that Hitler was pointedly anti-Christian. We are not aware of any published sources from acknowledged academic historians or writers that identify Adolf Hitler as significantly Catholic or Christian in his motivations as an adult.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/people/ph/Adolf_Hitler.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hossbach Memorandum ===&lt;br /&gt;
In the Hossbach Memorandum, Hitler blamed Christianity for the fall of Rome (rather than such being a judgment due to its degradation, and persecution of Christians and its message), stating: &amp;quot;It was only the disintegrating effect of Christianity, and the symptoms of age which appear in every country, which caused ancient Rome to succumb to the onslaught of the Germans.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/hossbach.asp]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, Albert Speer records that Hitler lamented, &amp;quot;You see, it’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion.&amp;quot; and that Islam would have more compatible for them than Christianity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=XLSa_RIDHMUC&amp;amp;dq=Albert+Speer,+Inside+the+Third+Reich,&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;source=bn&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=551HSrzDDcm0twf6x7TbBg&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=5 Inside the Third Reich, p. 96]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In another statement attributed to Hitler, he predicts, &amp;quot;I’m going to become a religious figure. Soon I’ll be the great chief of the Tartars. Already Arabs and Moroccans are mingling my name with their prayers.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adolf Hitler, cited in Waite, Robert, Adolf Hitler: The Psychopathic God (NY: Basic Books, 1977) p. 261) (Lutzer, pp. 62-63.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2132855/posts?page=101#101]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hitler's Table Talk ===&lt;br /&gt;
Clear but disputable evidence reveals Hitler as promoting a form of paganism, which the Nazi Party clearly sought to promote. ''Hitler's Table Talk'' is a series of informal, private conversations among Hitler and his closest associates, as recorded by [[Martin Bormann]] (himself one who was vehemently against Christianity). The ''ex tempore'' remarks excerpted below are attributed to Hitler:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adolf Hitler, London, Weidenfeld &amp;amp; Nicholson, 1953&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Night of 11–12 July 1941&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;[[National Socialism]] and religion cannot exist together....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Let it not be said that Christianity brought man the life of the soul, for that evolution was in the natural order of things.&amp;quot; (p 6 &amp;amp; 7)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 October 1941, midday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure.&amp;quot; (p 43)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14 October 1941, midday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death.... When understanding of the universe has become widespread... Christian doctrine will be convicted of absurdity....&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Christianity has reached the peak of absurdity.... And that's why someday its structure will collapse....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;...the only way to get rid of Christianity is to allow it to die little by little....&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Christianity &amp;lt;is&amp;gt; the liar...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We'll see to it that the Churches cannot spread abroad teachings in conflict with the interests of the State.&amp;quot; (p 49-52)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19 October 1941, night&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The reason why the ancient world was so pure, light and serene was that it knew nothing of the two great scourges: the pox and Christianity.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
21 October 1941, midday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Originally, Christianity was merely an incarnation of Bolshevism, the destroyer....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The decisive falsification of Jesus' [who he asserts many times was never a Jew] doctrine was the work of St.Paul. He gave himself to this work... for the purposes of personal exploitation....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;When all is said, we have no reason to wish that the Italians and Spaniards should free themselves from the drug of Christianity. Let's be the only people who are immunized against the disease.&amp;quot; (p 118-119)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14 December 1941, midday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Kerrl, with noblest of intentions, wanted to attempt a synthesis between National Socialism and Christianity. I don't believe the thing's possible, and I see the obstacle in Christianity itself....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Pure Christianity-- the Christianity of the catacombs-- is concerned with translating Christian doctrine into facts. It leads quite simply to the annihilation of mankind. It is merely whole-hearted Bolshevism, under a tinsel of metaphysics.&amp;quot; (p 119 &amp;amp; 120)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9 April 1942, dinner&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;There is something very unhealthy about Christianity.&amp;quot; (p 339)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
27 February 1942, midday&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Our epoch in the next 200 years will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity.... My regret will have been that I couldn't... behold &amp;lt;its demise&amp;gt;.&amp;quot; (p 278)&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Miscellaneous other quotes include,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;So it's not opportune to hurl ourselves now into a struggle with the churches. The best thing is to let Christianity die a natural death. A slow death has something comforting about it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Christianity, of course, has reached the peak of absurdity in this respect. And that's why one day its structure will collapse. Science has already impregnated humanity. Consequently, the more Christianity clings to its dogmas, the quicker it will decline.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We'll see to it that the churches cannot spread abroad teachings in conflict with the interests of the State. We shall continue to preach the doctrine of National Socialism, and the young will no longer be taught anything but the truth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Indeed, it's most important that the higher belief should be well established in them before the lower belief has been removed. We must finally achieve this.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;We do not want to educate anyone in atheism.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The observatory I'll have built at Linz, on the Pöstlingberg, I can see it in my mind ... In future, thousands of excursionists will make a pilgrimage there every Sunday. They'll thus have access to the greatness of our universe. The pediment will bear this motto: 'The heavens proclaim the glory of the everlasting.' It will be our way of giving men a religious spirit, of teaching them humility — but without the priests.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The final state must be: in St. Peter's Chair, a senile officiant; facing him, a few sinister old women, as gaga and as poor in spirit as anyone could wish.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;For my part, in his place [the Duce] I'd have taken the path of revolution. I'd have entered the Vatican and thrown everybody out — reserving the right to apologize later: 'Excuse me, it was a mistake!' But the result would have been, they'd have been outside!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
 [[Image:Nazi.jpg|thumb|right|250px|&amp;quot;With our flags is our victory&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;But a pope, even a criminal one, who protects great artists and spreads beauty around him, is nevertheless more sympathetic to me than the protestant minister who drinks from the poisoned spring.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I have six Divisions of SS composed of men absolutely indifferent in matters of religion. It doesn't prevent them from going to their deaths with serenity in their souls.&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;The soul and the mind migrate, just as the body returns to nature. Thus life is eternally reborn from life. As for the 'why' of all that, I feel no need to rack my brains on the subject. The soul is unplumbable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hitler on Religion: http://library.flawlesslogic.com/religion.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hitler, much like atheists, is seen to not only have scorned corruptions of Christian faith, but the whole faith as well. Having loosed himself from the moral authority of the Bible (though misappropriating it's &amp;quot;badge&amp;quot; at times for his own purposes) he was much free to be guided by his own &amp;quot;golden compass&amp;quot;, which is ultimately the atheistic basis for determining morality. Tragically however, while an innate sense of right can be right, Hitler's compass pointed south rather than north.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic planning==&lt;br /&gt;
[[James Burnham]], a former [[Trotskyite]] who served with the [[Office of Strategic Services]] (OSS) during the World War II and later contributed to the ''[[National Review]]'', described the Nazi regime's [[economic planning]].  Burnham pointed out how the original &amp;quot;workers revolution&amp;quot; of [[Marxism]] had in fact become a managerial revolution in all societies where Socialism had been embraced.  Writing in 1940, Burnham noted,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Outright state ownership and operation, advancing in all fields, are particularly ascendant in the extensive areas of new enterprise opened up during the Nazi rule....virtually all economic enterprise is subject to rigid state control; and it is control which we have seen to be decisive in relation to the instruments of production. Legal forms, even income privileges, are in the end subordinate to ''de facto'' control. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even where private owners still exist in Germany, the decisions about &amp;quot;their&amp;quot; property are not in their hands. They do not decide what to make or not to make. They do not establish prices or bargain about wages. They are not at liberty to buy the raw materials they might choose nor to seek the most profitable markets. They cannot, as a rule, decide how to invest or not invest their surplus funds. In short, they are no longer owners, no longer effective [[capitalist]]s...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The regulation of production in Germany is no longer left to the market. What is to be produced, and how much, is decided, deliberately, by groups of men, by the state boards and bureaus and commissions. It is they that decide whether a new plant shall be built or an old plant retired, how raw materials shall be allotted and orders distributed, what quotas must be fulfilled by various branches of industry, what goods shall be put aside for export, how prices shall be fixed and credit and exchange extended. There is no requirement that these decisions of the bureaus must be based on any profit aim in the capitalist sense. If it is thought expedient, for whatever reason, to produce, for example, an ersatz rubber or wool or food, this will be done even if the production entails, from a capitalist point of view, a heavy loss. Similarly, in order to accumulate foreign exchange or to stimulate some political effect in a foreign nation, goods will be exported regardless of loss. A factory may be compelled to shut down, even though it could operate at a high profit. Banks and individuals are forced to invest their funds with no reference to the private and voluntary opinions about &amp;quot;risks&amp;quot; from a profit standpoint. It is literally true to say that the Nazi economy, already, is not a &amp;quot;profit economy.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The workers, on their side, are no longer the &amp;quot;free proletarians&amp;quot; of capitalism. Under Nazism the workers are indeed, free from unemployment. At the same time they cannot, as individuals or through their own independent organizations, bargain for wages or change jobs at will. They are assigned to their tasks, and their labor conditions are fixed, by the decisions of the state bureaus and commissions. Millions of them are allotted to the vast state enterprises. ...With the reduction in the area of private enterprise and the increase of state enterprise, goes also a corresponding reduction in the social position of the private capitalists. So far as control over the instruments of production goes, the capitalists are already near the bottom. As to income privilege: a recent estimate by a New York statistician gives as a mere 5% the share of the German national income going to profits and interest. This is a substantial reduction from the 1933 figures, in spite of a huge increase in the total national income, which, under capitalism, would normally be accompanied by a percentage increase in profits. ...f the German capitalists' 5%, the greater part is appropriated by the state as taxes and &amp;quot;contributions.&amp;quot; ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...how seldom we find a manager among the voluntary or forced exiles from Nazi Germany! There are artists and writers among the exiles, ideologists and politicians, unassailable foes of the new regime, storekeepers and professionals and teachers, and not a few capitalists, both Jews and Christians. But almost never a manager....Germany is to-day a managerial state in an early stage. Structurally, it is less advanced along managerial lines than Russia; ...though structurally less advanced...Its industrial and technological foundation is far stronger; the rising managerial class is much larger, better trained, more able...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
...The first part of the second world war, up to the fall of France in June, 1940, was in reality the continuation of the strategic extension begun in 1935. This phase, the consolidation of the European base, was completed with France's surrender. It is completed irreversibly and can no longer be undone whatever the outcome of the succeeding phases of the war, which are really other wars. This consolidation fundamental to the world politics of managerial society, is not going to be dissolved, not even if the present German regime is utterly defeated. The day of a Europe carved into a score of sovereign states is over; if the states remain, they will be little more than administrative units in a larger collectivity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Burnham, James (1966). ''The Managerial Revolution'', Indiana University Press, Bloomingham, pp. 222-226, 232.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nazi Germany and homosexuality]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Health care in Nazi Germany]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hugo Boss]] - supplier of party uniforms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://econ161.berkeley.edu/TCEH/Slouch_Alternatives12.html Marxism, Fascism, Nazism] - Brad DeLong, Associate Professor of Economics, University of California at Berkeley&lt;br /&gt;
*Hitler, the Holocaust, and the Bible: A Scriptural Analysis of Anti-Semitism, National Socialism, and the Churches in Nazi Germany, by Joe Keysor&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:German History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Fascist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nazis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racist Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Oppression]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Police State]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drubg</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=1354208</id>
		<title>Socialism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Socialism&amp;diff=1354208"/>
		<updated>2017-06-15T23:32:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drubg: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Hitler.jpg|thumb|250px|right|One of the most well known political parties of the 20th century which was socialistic was the [[Nazi Party]] (NSDAP) headed by the [[fascist]], [[evolution|evolutionary racist]] [[Adolf Hitler]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;mises&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://mises.org/daily/1937&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;darNaz&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://creation.com/darwinism-and-the-nazi-race-holocaust&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;hott&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.hourofthetime.com/socialist.htm]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Socialism''' has its roots in visions of imaginary ideal societies, from thinkers who drew up elaborated designs and concepts for creating what they considered a more equal society, along collectivist lines or abolished private property; the primarily ideas came from British and French thinkers like [[Henri de Saint-Simon|Saint-Simon]], [[Charles Fourier]], Louis Blanc, and [[Robert Owen]] preceded by [[Thomas More]], Tommaso Campanella, and Jean Meslier. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the [[Atheism|atheist]] [[Karl Marx]]'s titles is the father of socialism. Currently it is considered a [[leftist]] [[economics|economic]] system which advocates state ownership or direct control of the major means of production and distribution of goods and services.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism Meriam-Webster]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism is the economic system imposed by [[Communism]], but another one of the most well known political parties of the 20th century that was socialistic was the [[Nazi Party|National Socialist German Workers' Party]] (Nazi Party), headed by the [[fascist]], but anti-communist&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/adolf_hitler.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Adolf Hitler]].  Often socialism is a matter of degree and numerous economies in the world are very socialistic such as [[Europe]]an countries (many of which are facing financial difficulties due to over taxation and excessive spending).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/05/european_socialism_is_bleeding.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Ur8756.jpg|right|thumb|[[Ludwig von Mises]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ludwig von Mises Institute]] declares:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The identification of [[Nazi]] [[Germany]] as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of [[Ludwig von Mises]]...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State. If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because many businesses still are privately owned, ipso facto, the [[United States]] is not a socialistic government. &amp;quot;That definition is confuted by the earliest theoretical writings on socialism.  In France, Henri de Saint-Simon, in the first decades of the 1800s, and his pupil and colleague [[Auguste Comte]], in the 1820s and 30s, along with [[Robert Owen]] contemporaneously in England, ''stated that the essential feature of what Owen called socialism is government regulation of the means of production and distribution.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ Thomas E. Brewton; Once Again: What Is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
When the government controls the volume of money and its economic applications, it has the economy in a stranglehold.  When government controls education so that nothing other than secular socialism may be taught, as Saint-Simon advocated, it controls the future destiny of a nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Barack Obama and his socialistic and &amp;quot;fascist light&amp;quot; policies ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shepard-Fairey-imgs.JPG|right|thumb|250px|[[Shepard Fairey]], designer of the official Obama hope and change logo, is more known for his anti-American and pro-communist themes. Here a  [[Mao Zedong|Maoist]]  revolutionary is depicted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://images.google.com/images?um=1&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-ContextMenu&amp;amp;rlz=1I7ACAW_en___US352&amp;amp;tbs=isch:1&amp;amp;q=Shepard+Fairey&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;start=40&amp;amp;ndsp=20&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2010, [[American]] political consultant [[Dick Morris]] wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|When [[Obama]] took office, federal, state and local spending accounted for 30 percent of [[gross domestic product]]. Now it is up to 35 percent, and when health care is fully implemented, it will rise to above 40 percent. But taxes are still below 30 percent. The difference is the deficit, now grown to 10 percent of our GDP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If our government is to continue spending 40 percent of our GDP, we will morph into the European model of a socialist democracy. But if we can roll the spending back to 30 percent, while holding taxes level, we will retain our free market system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://townhall.com/columnists/DickMorrisandEileenMcGann/2010/04/24/the_silent_killer_obamas_vat_proposal&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Anita Dunn]], the political strategist and former White House Communications Director, admitted that one of favorite political philosophers, one that she “turns to the most”, is [[Mao Zedong]], the [[communism|communist]] dictator responsible for the starvation, torture, and killing of 70 million Chinese.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.orthodoxytoday.org/blog/2009/10/16/anita-dunn-favorite-philosopher-mao-tse-tung/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of the Obama administration have coined the word &amp;quot;[[Obamunism]]&amp;quot; to describe Barack Obama's socialistic and &amp;quot;[[fascism]] light&amp;quot; [[economic planning]] policies ([[Benito Mussolini]] defined fascism as the wedding of state and corporate powers.  Accordingly, trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] labels [[Obama administration corporate bailouts|Obama's corporate bailouts]] as being &amp;quot;fascism light&amp;quot; in nature).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thebigmoney.com/articles/daily-intel/2009/07/20/obamunism-inc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.smallbusinessadvocate.com/small-business-interviews/gerald-celente-6944&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obamunism can also allude to Obama's [[Obama administration fiscal policy|ruinous fiscal policies]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|reckless monetary policies]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://seekingalpha.com/article/120883-monetary-policynot-obama-s-stimulusis-what-needs-watching&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nypost.com/seven/05172009/postopinion/editorials/bams_wise_words_169731.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
=== Larry Summers and Leftist Economics ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Larry Summers]] currently is the Director of the White House's National Economic Council (NEC) for President Barack Obama. George Gerald Reisman, Professor Emeritus of Economics at [[Pepperdine University]] and author of ''Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics'', wrote that Summers' socialistic ideas on redistributing wealth demonstrate that [[Larry Summers]] is a &amp;quot;lightweight leftist&amp;quot; who &amp;quot;fails to understand the nature of the most essential feature of capitalism, namely, private ownership of the means of production and the indispensable role it plays in the standard of living of the average person.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;misesblog&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://blog.mises.org/archives/009031.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Reisman also wrote that Summers is a shallow and ignorant man whose knowledge of economics is minimal and whose evil views qualify him to be the economic advisor to [[Hugo Chavez]] of [[Venezuela]] or [[Robert Mugabe]] of [[Zimbabwe]], but do not qualify him to be an economic advisor to the President of the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;misesblog&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Obama administration and land ownership ===&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2010, [[Hot Air]] declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The federal government, as the memo boasted, is the nation’s “largest land manager.” It already owns roughly [http://bigthink.com/ideas/21343 one of every three acres] in the United States. This is apparently not enough. At a “listening session” in New Hampshire last week, government bureaucrats trained their sights on millions of [http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9HGKEAG0.htm private forest land]  throughout the [[New England]] region. Agriculture Secretary [[Tom Vilsack]] crusaded for “the need for additional attention to the Land and Water Conservation Fund — and the need to promptly support full funding of that fund.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Property owners have every reason to be worried. The Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is a pet project of green radicals, who want the decades-old government slush fund for buying up private lands to be freed from congressional appropriations oversight. It’s paid for primarily with receipts from the government’s offshore oil and gas leases. Both Senate and House Democrats have included $900 million in full LWCF funding, not subject to congressional approval, in their energy/BP oil spill legislative packages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hotair.com/archives/2010/08/14/great-outdoors-initiative-a-federal-land-grab/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Influence of Russia on socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Not until the birth of the [[Soviet Union]] after the [[Communist Revolution]] did the idea become generally accepted that socialism meant government seizing ownership of the economy.  Experience in 19th and 20th century [[France]], [[England]], and [[Germany]], however, made it clear that regulatory control by government bureaucrats is sufficient to implement socialism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/once_again_what_is_socialism/ What is Socialism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Communism (the primary variant of socialism) the central goal is to establish a &amp;quot;worker's paradise&amp;quot;-an ideal state with perfect equality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In practice the socialist government owns the banks, railroads, farmlands, factories, and stores, and is the only employer, or at least controls the regulation of production and distribution.  The central goal is to destroy the &amp;quot;evils of capitalism&amp;quot; by government ownership or control of the means of production, usually with one party controlling the government on behalf of the working class. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist system never manages to establish this &amp;quot;paradise&amp;quot; because management for the benefit of the employees leads to featherbedding and lack of investment or economic growth, at the expense of consumers.  Collective farming (operating farms like factories) sharply reduced the food supply. The most thoroughgoing efforts by Communist regimes turned into authoritarian dictatorships. The government controls all investments, production, distribution, income, and prices, as well as all organizations, schools, news media and formerly private societies. Churches and labor unions are suppressed or controlled by the government. Socialism is the antithesis of [[capitalism]], because it opposes private ownership of capital or land, and rejects the free market in favor of central planning. It also rejects &amp;quot;civil society&amp;quot; and makes sure that all organizations are controlled by the government.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically, socialist regimes can have multiple parties. In practice there is only one political party, and it controls the government. The leaders of the party choose the government officials and set all policies for the nation and for cities and localities.  Opposition parties are not allowed access to the media or to meeting halls or to funding, and their leaders are often arrested as &amp;quot;enemies of the people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the redistribution of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the many over the rights of the few, but in practice when socialist economic principles are forced onto a nation by a totalitarian government a new Upper Class appears which is much better off than the Lower Class.&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|'''&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; &amp;lt;small&amp;gt;- Winston Churchill&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.quotesdaddy.com/quote/280995/winston-churchill/socialism-is-a-philosophy-of-failure-the-creed-of Churchill; Quotesdaddy.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Contradictory Goals of Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism's stated purpose is to eliminate the huge gap between the highest and lowest classes of society. Their bitter complaint has been that the upper class exploits its dominance to gain privileges and wealth, while the lower class must suffer tyranny and poverty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;all socialists agree that a socialist economy must be run for the benefit of the vast majority of the people rather than for a small aristocratic, plutocratic, or capitalist class.&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_an_economic_system]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This obsession with class paradoxically creates a group of people with a vested interest in seeing class differences remain (socialist politicians, [[community organizer]]s, ''etc.''); if by some means the class system actually ''were'' destroyed, these people would be out of a job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another essential goal of most socialist thinkers has been to eliminate [[Capitalism]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;... one of the fundamental goals of the socialist movement throughout history has been the abolition of capitalism&amp;quot; [http://www.experiencefestival.com/socialism_-_opposition_and_criticisms_of_socialism_arguments_for_and_against A Wisdom Archive on Socialism - Opposition and criticisms of socialism; arguments for and against]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
on the grounds that only &amp;quot;social control&amp;quot; of the economy can prevent abuses such as [[feudalism]], [[monopoly]], [[cartel]]s, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But experiments on both a moderate and a grand scale have shown that socialism's main purpose has been undermined by its unremitting opposition to [[free market]] economics. In its drive to eliminate capitalism, it has overlooked the fact that general prosperity is vouchsafed by [[economic freedom]], and that free market economics improves the lot of the poor much more quickly and permanently than any system of central economic control.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The real aim of socialists is probably personal: why else would socialists want to create programs which encourage Dependency? Well, it fits into their lust for power. &lt;br /&gt;
People who want to control others need people who are willing to be controlled.&lt;br /&gt;
Independent, proactive people do not fit into the socialist Power Model. That is why the first thing [[Karl Marx|Marx]] wanted to remove from the economy was the [[Profit]] Motive: it gives people an incentive to make their own decisions!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Types of Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three main kinds of Socialism, all of them are built on the premise of government control of the means of production.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Leninism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Backrdv12n2.jpg|right|400px|thumb|The Russian caption reads, &amp;quot;Long live the great unbeatable flag of [[Karl Marx|Marx]], [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]], [[Vladimir Lenin|Lenin]], [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]]!&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist Socialism, or '''Leninism''', as revised by [[Vladimir Lenin]] and practiced in the pre-[[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] Soviet Union, was the Socialistic theory developed by Vladimir Lenin during his rise to power. Lenin defined socialism as a transitional stage between capitalism and communism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In striving for socialism, however, we are convinced that it will develop into communism&amp;quot;, Lenin, State and Revolution, Selected Works, Progress publishers, Moscow, 1968, p. 320. (End of chapter four)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Leninism is totalitarian, with no [[democracy]] and all decision made by the leaders of the Communist party. Lenin saw the Communist Party as an &amp;quot;elite&amp;quot; that was committed to ending capitalism and instituting socialism in its place and attaining the power by any means possible, including revolution. Lenin was quite mild on the belief, believing that, though controlling of resources was important, the people's will comes first.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though [[Bolshevik]] Russia was somewhat more prosperous than its former [[Russian Empire|Tsardom]], Lenin's death in 1924 sparked the overthrow of his Marxist–Leninism and the imposition of [[Stalinism]], the violent, totalitarian belief that went against some of Lenin's ideas (many of Lenin's works were censored by Stalin post-1924).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===&amp;quot;Democratic&amp;quot; Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
The second form of Socialism (sometimes called &amp;quot;Revisionism&amp;quot;) prevailed in Europe down to the 1970s, and is typified by the [[Fabian Socialism|Fabian Society]] and the British Labour Party. It was inspired by Socialism and closely linked to labor unions that had real power. The goal was for [[Industrial Democracy]], that is, for the government to own (&amp;quot;nationalize&amp;quot;) major industries such as coal mining, railways, steel making, shipbuilding, airlines, and banking. Small businesses remained private. The idea was that labor unions controlled the government and therefore unions controlled working conditions and wages for the benefit of workers, regardless of the damage to long-term economic growth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Socialists were well organized and after 1918 they bitterly fought the breakaway faction that became the [[Communist]] movement. In recent years major Socialist parties (in Europe and Canada) have sometimes dropped the long-standing demands for state ownership of the means of production and have mostly accepted &amp;quot;Controlled Capitalism&amp;quot;. However they remain tied to labor unions and favor liberal policies regarding high taxes and public spending. Conservatives have been negative toward the economics of the second form of socialism. Conservatives complain socialists use government power to redistribute wealth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Within the [[European Union]], a form of [[democratic socialism]] was initially viewed as successful, but eventually lead to lowered social equity and a downward spiraling economy, as well as general discontent. Although this acts as a drag on the economy, in democratic countries of the industrialized west, some socialist ideas have been put into practice with varying degree of success. Beginning in 2010 many European countries were racked with rioting and social unrest as governments began to back away from out-of-control entitlements that began bankrupting them and lead to a world financial crisis because of unrestrained debt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703791804575439732358241708.html WSJ; &amp;quot;Obstacle to Deficit Cutting: A Nation on Entitlements&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100929/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_europe_austerity_protests_10 Anti-austerity protests sweep across Europe]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.allbusiness.com/economy-economic-indicators/economic-policy-bailouts/14758032-1.html &amp;quot;Debt crisis pushes Europe toward economic reforms&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Communal Socialism===&lt;br /&gt;
The third form of Socialism has nothing to do with Marx or government ownership, and emphasizes the importance of the community over the individual.  Usually it means small communities sharing most of their possessions. The most famous examples are the religious [[Shakers]] of the 19th century (a conservative group), and the new-left communes that briefly existed in the 1960s and 70s. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Early American settlers, as in Plymouth or Virginia, tried it but quickly abandoned it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The Pilgrims in Plymouth used communal farming their first winter but then after a dismal harvest that first year, moved to a system where there was a more direct incentive other than guilt and honor. Governor Bradford summed it up in his journal:&lt;br /&gt;
:* &amp;quot;And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number, for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance) and ranged all boys and youth under some family. This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:Not only were all hands more industrious—the incentive to harvest communal corn before it was fully ripe, a problem equivalent to poaching in the case of wildlife, was also eliminated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://www.econlib.org/library/Columns/y2006/Robertsincentives.html Incentives Matter] - Russell Roberts - Library of Economics and Liberty&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!&lt;br /&gt;
!Communist Manifesto&lt;br /&gt;
![[Nazi]] Party Platform&lt;br /&gt;
!Analysis&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand an agrarian reform in accordance with our national requirements, and the enactment of a law to expropriate the owners without compensation of any land needed for the common purpose. The abolition of ground rents, and the prohibition of all speculation in land.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The stripping away of land from private owners.  [[Liberalism]] today demands &amp;quot;eminent domain&amp;quot; on property.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand the nationalization of all trusts...profit-sharing in large industries...a generous increase in old-age pensions...by providing maternity welfare centers, by prohibiting juvenile labor...and the creation of a national (folk) army.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The points raised in the [[Nazi]] platform demand an increase in taxes to support them.  Liberalism today demands heavy progressive and graduated income taxes.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|3&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Abolition of all rights of inheritance.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;That all unearned income, and all income that does not arise from work, be abolished.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|Liberalism today demands a &amp;quot;death tax&amp;quot; on anyone inheriting an estate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|4&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|The Nuremberg Laws of 1934 allowed Germany to take Jewish property.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|5&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand the nationalization of all trusts.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of the financial system.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|6&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We demand that there be a legal campaign against those who propagate deliberate political lies and disseminate them through the press...editors and their assistants on newspapers published in the German language shall be German citizens...Non-German newspapers shall only be published with the express permission of the State...the punishment for transgressing this law be the immediate suppression of the newspaper...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of the press.  Liberals today demand control or suppression of talk radio and Fox News.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|7&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &amp;amp;c, &amp;amp;c.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;In order to make it possible for every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education, and thus the opportunity to reach into positions of leadership, the State must assume the responsibility of organizing thoroughly the entire cultural system of the people. The curricula of all educational establishments shall be adapted to practical life. The conception of the State Idea (science of citizenship) must be taught in the schools from the very beginning. We demand that specially talented children of poor parents, whatever their station or occupation, be educated at the expense of the State. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|Central control of education, with an emphasis on doing things their way.  Liberals today are doing things ''their way'' in our schools.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Controversy==&lt;br /&gt;
''This section confuses &amp;quot;interpretation&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;debate&amp;quot;.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ideology of '''Socialism''' is subject to a variety of interpretations. From a conservative perspective, Marxist socialism is an economic system whereby the means of production are seized and monopolized by the government sometimes without compensation to the builders of the [[capital]]. Investments, production, distribution, income, prices, and economic justice are administered by a government [[nomenklatura]] that regulates the transfer of money, goods (including capital goods), and services primarily through taxation, regulation and aggressive institutionalized coercion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, some socialists reject this description. Democratic socialists advocate a system of governance based on the principles of [[solidarity]], [[equality]] and [[liberty]], viewing these principles as interconnected. They believe increased socio-economic equality is associated with increased practical freedom to fulfill human potential. In many countries, such as Britain, socialist movements have been built on Christian, democratic and co-operative bases, embracing the notion that individuals should 'treat others as they would wish to be treated', and arguing that all individuals have a moral responsibility for the welfare of other members of their society. Socialism seeks to prioritize human welfare over other goals, such as profit and wealth accumulation by elites; it views increased redistribution of wealth as vital to securing greater freedom and happiness for the bulk of the people. Though this rosy picture of socialism is appealing to many, it ignores what Hayek called &amp;quot;the road to serfdom.&amp;quot;  Though in theory socialism is an idealized, egalitarian form of economics, in practice it means rule by labor bosses who minimize individualism and economic growth in the name of equality and benefits for the working class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Karl Marx]] considered socialism to be a transitory stage between capitalism and communism. In his view, socialism is summed up by the expression: &amp;quot;From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.&amp;quot; A major criticism of socialism is that it infringes individual rights in favor of the populace. In a very real sense, politics in the Western World throughout the 20th century was shaped by the conflict between socialist and capitalist governmental policies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although socialist parties are common in Europe, the leading examples all currently embrace some free enterprise, individual property rights and certain other aspects of capitalism although leading European Socialists are very critical of America. In many European countries socialism has been changing to [[Social democracy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Key elements==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a political ideology based on the expropriation of wealth, socialism stresses the privileges of the nomenklatura over the rights of workers and earners.  Many of the most notoriously oppressive dictatorships have been socialist, such as the [[Soviet Union]] and China under Mao Zedong. Private wealth was seized and the owners executed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Welfare state===&lt;br /&gt;
As an economic theory, democratic socialism calls for equalization of incomes, through taxation of private wealth coupled with welfare state spending. The [[nationalization]] of major industries is primarily a device to allow the unionized workers to control their own wages and working conditions, cutting out the capitalistic owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State [[pension]]s and unemployment insurance were not brought in by Socialists—they were first introduced by arch-conservative Chancellor [[Bismarck]] in Germany in the 1870s. In Britain they were introduced about 1910 by [[Winston Churchill]] and [[David Lloyd George]] of the [[Liberal Party]], and in the U.S. were part of Democratic President, Franklin D. Roosevelt's,[[New Deal]] in the 1930s.  Welfare state ideas such as [[universal health care]], and state control of key industries have been common throughout the developed world in the modern era. However, the United States has always rejected socialism as an ideological position, with a few exceptions such as the [[TVA]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
Some forms of socialism have often been [[atheism|atheistic]] in character, and many leading socialists (most prominently Karl Marx) have been critical of the role of religion - and conservative religion in particular - which they criticize for lending support to an unjust social order. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Socialists have been Christians, and there has been considerable interplay between Christian and Socialist ideas. [[Christian socialists]] have asserted that early Christian communities, in particular, displayed certain traits, such as the holding of possessions in common,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:44: &amp;quot;Everyone was filled with awe, and many wonders and miraculous signs were done by the apostles. All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the rejection of conventional sexual mores and gender roles, the provision for communal education, etc., that could be considered similar to socialism. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the chaos sparked by the advent of the Reformation in Europe, several sects with radical new interpretations of Christianity sprung up, many of them Anabaptists (believers in adult baptism). Under the leadership of the reformer Thomas Muntzer the peasants of south-west Germany rose up in arms against the clergy and nobility, establishing anarcho-communes in their wake. Though they were massacred to a man, ten years later a group of radical Anabaptists under the leadership of Jan Matthys seized control of the north-western Germany city of Munster from the Prince-Archbishop there and established a Christian-Communist state. True to the spirit of applied communism, Mathys took twelve wives, held lavish feasts for himself and his most loyal followers and had himself crowned King of the World as the city starved, besieged by an alliance of Protestant and Catholic forces keen to see them exterminated. Mathys and all his followers were all tortured and killed when the Prince-Archbishop returned with professional troops to sack the city and reassert his authority, effectively wiping out all non-pacifistic Anabaptists in north-western Germany. Only Baptists as we know them today survived the following persecution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See, for instance,  Arnold Toynbee, the British historian, has responded to this,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;the Marxian excerpt from a Christian Socialism is an experiment which is doomed to failure because it has denied itself the aid of the spiritual power which alone is capable of making Socialism a success. ….'Christianity', they say, 'is the opiate of the People'; and, in the [[Soviet Union]]… Christianity or of any other theistic religion have been debarred… from admission to membership of the All-Union Communist Party. In fact, Communism has been definitely and militantly anti-Christian. Thus the campaign against Christianity which is to-day an integral part of the propaganda of [[Marxian Socialism]] is a challenge to the living generation of Christians …we latter-day Christians may still turn a Marxian attack upon Christianity to good account … a re-awakening of the Christian social conscience has been the one great positive practical achievement of Karl Marx&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'', Annex II to Vol. V, Part C (i) (c) 2, p. 585-586, Marxism, Socialism, and Christianity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====New Testament socialism====&lt;br /&gt;
The earliest Christians were decidedly living in a manner consistent with basic aims of socialism, albeit with critical requirements and distinctions from its secularist expressions. Luke 14:33 requires the forsaking of all one has if one will be a disciple of Christ, and while this is not shown to necessarily always require the literally forsaking of all,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Acts 2:44 states that the communal believers &amp;quot;had all things common&amp;quot;. Acts 4:32-5:11 also describes community redistribution of property, and details the Divine punishment of a husband and wife for hypocrisy, in keeping proceeds from the sale of a piece of property while openly pretending that they gave it all, as others  voluntarily did.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible, (5:1-11)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, forsaking all is shown to be that of first surrendering oneself and life to the God of the Bible, and placing all at His disposal,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Matthew Henry (1662 - 1714), ''Commentary on the Whole Bible'', Lk. 14:25-35&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Archibald Thomas Robertson, ''WORD PICTURES IN THE NEW TESTAMENT'', Lk. 14:33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with literal giving as a result being as He directs, and voluntary. (2Cor. 8,9) &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let him give; not grudgingly, or of necessity: for God loveth a cheerful giver. And God is able to make all grace abound toward you; that ye, always having all sufficiency in all things, may abound to every good work: (2 Corinthians 9:7-8)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the early organic community provides a noble model of communal life, and of a &amp;quot;seminary&amp;quot; type experience, it was also soon dispersed by persecution (thus greatly expanding the church: Acts 8:1-5; 11:19), and it is later indicated that believers retained ownership of property after conversion. (Lk. 19:8,9; Acts 16:14,15; 1Cor. 11:22; 2Tim. 4:13) Rich Christians are evidenced to have been part of the early church, but were not mandated by the church itself to give all they had away, but to be lowly in mind, and to be ready and willing to distribute, in faith and surrender to God. (1Tim. 6:17-19) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, in both Testaments capitalism is clearly supported,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gary North, ''Capitalism and the Bible''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  and indolence is not subsidized, but penalized by poverty, while diligence in work is rewarded by its fruits. (Prov. 6:6-11; 13:4; 20:4; 2 Thes. 3:10-12; 1 Tim. 5:17-18) Although holy widows over 60 years old who were without familial support were taken in by the church, a man is clearly required to provide for his own family, if able. (1Tim. 5:2ff) &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
While the success of the early church as an organic community is often invoked in support of modern socialism, and many communes of the 1960s evoked the Bible, the early organic church was a result of the supernatural work of the Holy Spirit among believers, while the &amp;quot;administrators&amp;quot; were humble servants who were examples of self-sacrifice, and who worked with their own hands as needed, (1Cor. 4:9-16) and whose authority was established by manifest Divine attestation, including the pro-active exercise of church discipline being only by supernatural or otherwise spiritual means, not carnal force.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Acts 2:43; 5:5,9,10; 1Cor. 4:19-21; 2Cor. 13:2,3; 2Thes. 3:14,15; 2Tim. 4:2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition other distinctions, without the unique changes and influence resulting from faith and full surrender to Christ from all the community, and His anointing upon the work, attempts to mimic the communal life of Christians have failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As one critic of modern-day  socialism states: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Socialism, unfortunately, completely disregards Biblical teaching about the fallen nature of human beings and assumes that human beings will act in a morally upright fashion if their basic needs are met. This is at the heart of why socialistic systems never work: because human nature does not work in this fashion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.dakotavoice.com/2009/06/capitalism-and-socialism-in-light-of-the-bible Bob Ellis, ''Capitalism and Socialism in Light of the Bible''] Dakota Voice, June 23rd, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Britain, the Labour Party and Socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At its inception, the [[Labour Party]] borrowed socialist ideas by committing itself to a program of nationalization under 'Clause 4' of their Constitution, but was always fundamentally committed to the British system of parliamentary government. Clause 4 was formally dropped after the election of [[Tony Blair]] as Party leader, signaling the creation of 'New' Labour.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/july/21/newsid_2515000/2515825.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The British governments of 1945-1950 and 1950-1951 under [[Clement Attlee]] implemented the nationalization of several industries and utilities, including coal, steel, water, railways and electricity. Former owners of nationalized industries were compensated.  The best known example is the nationalization of health care to create the [[National Health Service]] (NHS).  This made - literally overnight - health care &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; at the point of delivery for everybody in Britain, and it remains so today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1980s under Conservative Prime Minister [[Margaret Thatcher]] most of the nationalized industries were returned to the private sector, and public housing has been sold to the residents. These conservative decisions were endorsed by the &amp;quot;New Labour&amp;quot; of Tony Blair, to the annoyance of elderly radicals who fondly remember the poverty and inefficiencies of the old system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticism of socialism ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Hayek]] and [[Ludwig von Mises]] were important critics of socialism, particularly regarding what is known as the Socialist Calculation Debate.  Hayek and Mises argued that a socialist economy would face information constraints that would prevent even well intentioned planners from efficiently allocating resources.  That is, the planners would not know how much a battleship or a hospital cost, and could not efficiently allocate resources among different choices.  This criticism should be considered as compatible with, but independent of, criticisms based on [[Public choice theory]] that bring into consideration the incentives of political actors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Svetlana Kunin, who lived in the Soviet Union until 1980 explains how the system worked: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Life in the USSR modeled the socialist ideal. God-based religion was suppressed and replaced with cultlike adoration for political figures....Only the ruling class of communist leaders had access to special stores, medicine and accommodations that could compare to those in the West. The rest of the citizenry had to deal with permanent shortages of food and other necessities, and had access to free but inferior, unsanitary and low-tech medical care.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
USSR, 1959: I am a &amp;quot;young pioneer&amp;quot; in school. History classes remind us that there is a higher authority than their parents and teachers: the leaders of the Communist Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Those who left Russia found a different set of values in America: freedom of religion, speech, individual pursuits, the right to private property and free enterprise....These opportunities let the average immigrant live a better life than many elites in the Soviet Communist Party...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The slogans of &amp;quot;fairness and equality&amp;quot; sound better than the slogans of capitalism. But unlike at the beginning of the 20th century, when these slogans and ideas were yet to be tested, we have accumulated history and reality.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/SpecialReport.aspx?id=512665 ''The Perspective Of A Russian Immigrant''], ''Investors Business Daily,'' 09/10/2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A government which adheres to economic socialistic principles also tends to have cultures which prize unmerited equality among citizen and criminal alike, and through extension of socialistic welfare policies, between the chronically employed and the chronically unemployed, by ensuring both groups receive income though only one group works for income. This enables people otherwise healthy to not seek gainful employment because they will receive income no matter their actions, thus providing no incentive to produce. The economies of socialistic governments are thus weak and riddled with flaws, such as expecting increased production from a reduced workforce, and when engendered with a progressive culture, which simply means people who do are the same as people who do not, eventually fall under the weight of their own poorly managed and over-extended public welfare institutions. Public welfare also decreases personal charity, thus making the people dependent on the aid of the government since charitable aid, such as from a church, is discouraged by the secular nature of socialistic nations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialists occasionally appeal to the fact that God, in the Old Testament, commanded His own nation to surrender a tenth of its proceeds for the maintenance of the priests and for the care of the sickly and weak. But, while fallen men, and their secular and pagan nations, shall always struggle to understand the righteous balances between government and liberty.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;npr&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.npr.org/2011/08/23/139761274/how-the-a-p-changed-the-way-we-shop ''The Great A&amp;amp;P and the Struggle for Small Business in America''], &amp;quot;NPR’s interview of the book’s author, Marc Levinson&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (i.e., between local and national logistics, as well as between the logistics of the individual person and those of his community) the mark of socialism is the general allowance for a naive, and willingly ignorant, adult sub-population whose members prefer, despite the limitations imposed by bureaucratic accountability, to live under all the securities rightly afforded in the fallen world only to infants. In the unfallen world, such security was a given for all persons, but without any of the bureaucracy required in the fallen world for maintaining it. In the fallen world, such security is an unattainable ideal, so that the more is done to attain it, the more the society suffers under the requisite bureaucracy. And, while the initial policy made toward that ideal is the creation of an executive class or executive vocation, such as monarchies and professional armies,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blueletterbible.org/Bible.cfm?b=1Sa&amp;amp;c=8&amp;amp;t=KJV#19 ''First Samuel 8:19-20''] Blue Letter Bible&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wbur.org/media-player?url=http://hereandnow.wbur.org/2011/09/29/consequences-combat-vietnam&amp;amp;title=The+Consequences+Of+Combat&amp;amp;segment=consequences-combat-vietnam&amp;amp;pubdate=2011-09-29&amp;amp;source=hereandnow ''Interview of Vietnam war veteran, and '''What It Is Like To Go To War''' author, Karl Marlantes, on NPR's Here And Now'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there is a 'tipping point' in the creation of bureaucratic entities beyond which any civilization cannot help but increasingly lose its footing in the struggle to balance all its righteous human interests. The result is an ever-increasing proportion of that civilization's total population which, for all variety of reasons, becomes enslaved to their own demands for that ideal of security. When there is no judge who judges righteously, when all the people make the laws, and when the power of money is used to try to stay ahead of the natural consequences of unrighteousness, the 'bad money' cannot help but drive out the 'good money', until the 'Bank of Reality' is forced to call in the loan, and the civilization implodes to the point that it falls victim also to militant invaders and, or, to unmanageable internal unrest.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;npr&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Past Socialist Countries==&lt;br /&gt;
===Chile===&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist socialist leader [[Salvador Allende]] was elected in Chile in 1970 in a minority government run by the Popular Unity Party. Allende's economic policy, known as the Vuskovic Plan, sought to achieve transition to socialism. The Vuskovic Plan involved nationalization of large foreign enterprises, land redistribution to farmers, and redistribution of income. The majority in Parliament never supported it and the plan was never carried out as Allende was overthrown by the military.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other Socialist Countries (Current )==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[[Cuba]]===&lt;br /&gt;
Communist leader [[Fidel Castro]] violently overthrew the Cuban government in the 1950s and has declared Cuba to be communist since then, nationalizing millions of dollars worth of American-owned property. It is notable that Fidel Castro originally self-defined as [[liberal]], before coming out openly as a communist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;q=&amp;amp;esrc=s&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;cd=5&amp;amp;ved=0CGoQFjAE&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fib-global-history-ii-period-5.aspen.high.schoolfusion.us%2Fmodules%2Flocker%2Ffiles%2Fget_group_file.phtml%3Ffid%3D6868636%26gid%3D1176955%26sessionid%3D0&amp;amp;ei=o74IUPDNOqPp6wGbtPGxCg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNG1bEoHrxurCF_WL1OPKMxIb4hCTw Fidel Castro - His Rise and Rule of Cuba]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Today, Cuba faces copious economic problems and the people lack their fundamental rights. (Fidel's brother [[Raul Castro]] now runs the country, having taken it over from his ailing brother Fidel.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===North Korea===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[North Korea]]'s form of communism is in the form of &amp;quot;Juche&amp;quot; - a doctrine established by [[Kim Il Sung]] and carried on by his son [[Kim Jong Il]] and after his death by the current leader [[Kim Jong-un]]. Although it is investing heavily in nuclear weapons and long-range missiles, extreme poverty on the verge of starvation is the fate of the people, who are very tightly controlled. The country has little to no electrical power at night outside the capital, which can be verified by looking at nighttime satellite photos.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epod.usra.edu/archive/epodviewer.php3?oid=87488&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Venezuela===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The socialist policies of president-for-life Hugo Chavez have destroyed the economy of that oil-rich nation. In 2009, he seized the Venezuelan operations of U.S. based Cargill in order to tighten his grip on the shrinking food supply in his country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/southamerica/venezuela/4938993/Venezuelas-Hugo-Chavez-tightens-state-control-of-food-amid-rocketing-inflation-and-food-shortages.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the death of Chavez, [[Nicolás Maduro]] continues his politics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Countires===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Daniel Ortega]], the dictator of [[Nicaragua]], is a strong ally of Venezuela and Cuba. [[China]] and [[Vietnam]] have abolished the Socialist economy but are still governed by Communist parties. Other countries who are controlled by Socialist parties are [[Laos]], [[Angola]], [[Mozambique]] and [[Moldova]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes on Socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
Comparative quotes are given from the top [[Left-wing]] - [[Socialist]] - [[National Socialist]] (a.k.a. [[Nazi]]) - [[Marxist]] - [[Communist]] leaders and their critics in order to better understand the commonality of the end result of their similar philosophy taken to its fruition by the [[big government]] [[welfare state]]-[[nanny state]]-[[police state]] by [[leftist]] [[globalist]]-[[statist]]-socialist-communists. For more examples, see [[Nazism and socialism]]. From these quotes one can see little difference between Socialists, Nazis, Communists, Marxists. Communist regimes killed 60 million in the 20th century through [[genocide]], according to [[Le Monde]] and more than 100 million people according to ''The Black Book of Communism''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from National Socialist's Adolph Hitler===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Then will come a [[National Socialism|National Socialist]] State tribunal; then will November, 1918, be expiated; then the [[mass murder|heads will roll]].&lt;br /&gt;
** testimony at a trial of German officers, Leipzig, in 1930.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We have to put a stop to the idea that it is a part of everybody's [[unalienable rights|civil rights]] to [[freedom of speech|say whatever he pleases]].&lt;br /&gt;
** transcript of a conversation (22 February 1942)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;National socialism is the determination to create a [[slave|new man]]. There will no longer exist any individual arbitrary [[free will|will]], nor realms in which the individual belongs to himself. The time of happiness as a private matter is over.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** As quoted in Joachim C. Fest (1974), ''Hitler''. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, p.&amp;amp;nbsp;533.&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I have sympathy for Mr. [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt|Roosevelt]], because he marches straight toward his objectives over Congress, lobbies and bureaucracy.&amp;quot; Hitler went on to note that he was the sole leader in Europe who expressed &amp;quot;understanding of the methods and motives of President Roosevelt.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://www.fff.org/freedom/0795a.asp] ''New York Times'' 1934, quoted from John Toland: ''Adolf Hitler: The Definitive Biography''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quotes from National Socialist's Heinrich Himmler ===&lt;br /&gt;
From the Nazi party ([[National Socialism]]) [[SS]] leader [[Heinrich Himmler]]:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;In the course of history periods of capitalism and socialism alternate with one another; capitalism is the unnatural, socialism the natural [[economic system]]...The [[Nazi|National Socialists]] and the [[Communists|Red Front]] have the same aspirations. The [[Jew]]s falsified the Revolution in the form of [[Marxism]] and that failed to bring fulfillment.&amp;quot;—Speech in [[Potsdam]] (13 October 1926), quoted in Peter Longerich, Heinrich Himmler (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;92–93.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The best political weapon is the [[terrorism|weapon of terror]]. Cruelty commands respect. Men may hate us. But, we don't ask for their love; only for their fear.&amp;quot;—Quoted in &amp;quot;Visions of Reality - A Study of Abnormal Perception and Behavior&amp;quot; - by Alberto Rivas - Psychology - 2007 - Page 162&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Quotes from Lenin ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Vladimir Lenin]] stated:&lt;br /&gt;
* “The way to crush the [[middle class]] is to grind them between the millstones of [[taxation]] and [[inflation]].”&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The best revolutionary is youth devoid of [[moral]]s.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;A lie told often enough becomes the truth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The goal of socialism is communism.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;There are no morals in [[politics]] there is only expedience. A scoundrel may be of use to us just because he is a scoundrel.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Give us the child for 8 years and it will be a [[Bolshevik]] forever.&amp;quot; (see [[Public school values]] and [[Professor values]])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Stalin===&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Darwin-Stalin connection'' describes the brutal [[Soviet]] dictator [[Josef Stalin]] who [[mass murder|murdered millions]] of people, giving credit to [[Charles Darwin|Darwin]]'s book for his outlook in life:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The death of one man is a tragedy, the [[mass murder|death of millions]] is a statistic.&amp;quot; ~ to [[Churchill]], 1945.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Death is the solution to all problems. No man - no problem&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Ideas are more powerful than [[guns]]. We would [[gun control|not let our enemies have guns]], why should we let them have ideas?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;It is enough that the people know there was an [[election]]. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The only real power comes out of a long [[rifle]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;When we hang the [[capitalist]]s they will sell us the rope we use.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Leon Trotsky===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Repression for the attainment of economic ends is a necessary weapon of the socialist [[dictatorship]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Leon Trotsky]] in ''Terrorism and Communism : A Reply to Karl Kautsky'' (1920; 1975), p.&amp;amp;nbsp;153&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The road to socialism lies through a period of the highest possible intensification of the principle of the state … Just as a lamp, before going out, shoots up in a brilliant flame, so the state, before disappearing, assumes the form of the dictatorship of the proletariat, i.e., the most ruthless form of state, which embraces the life of the citizens authoritatively in every direction...&lt;br /&gt;
** ''Terrorism and Communism : A Reply to Karl Kautsky'' (1920; 1975), p. 177&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Leon Trotsky in his book The [[Russian Revolution]], 1930&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Root out the counterrevolutionaries without mercy, lock up suspicious characters in concentration camps... Shirkers will be [[extermination camp|shot]], regardless of past service.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Statement of 1918, as quoted in ''Trotsky : The Eternal Revolutionary'' (1996) by Dmitri Volkogonov, p.&amp;amp;nbsp;213&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Mao===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mao Zedong]], responsible for the deaths of 77 million [[Chinese]] states:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Every Communist must grasp the truth: Political power grows out of the barrel of a [[gun]].&amp;quot;—The [[Little Red Book]], 1964&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Our principle is that the [[Communist Party|Party]] commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes on Kim Il-sung===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Kim Il-sung]] took the communist [[cult of personality]] to a new level.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Barbara Demick (2010) ''Nothing to Envy: Real Lives in North Korea'', Granta, page 45, ISBN 9781847081414&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In Korea, the Americans have far exceed the Hitlerites!&amp;quot;—by Kim Il-sung&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;**Kim Il-sung to the [[Swedish]] communist leader [[Frank Baude]] in 1993.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;When it comes to the orchestration of terror, Kim Jong-il is a natural born genius.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Kim Duk Hong]] quoted in ''[[BBC News]]'' (21 July 2003) &amp;quot;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/correspondent/3065101.stm Inside the mind of Kim Jong-il]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Quotes from Pol Pot===&lt;br /&gt;
As ruler of [[Cambodia]] Pol Pot was responsible for [[mass murder|exterminating]] 2 million people by [[genocide]]. That's a quarter of the country's population:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Exterminate the 50 million [[Vietnamese]]... and purify the masses of the [[Cambodian]] people.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
** Phnom Penh radio broadcast by [[Pol Pot]] of the [[Khmer Rouge]] (May 10, 1978) ([http://www.enotes.com/genocide-encyclopedia/khmer-rouge])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Related Quotes from Others===&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;[[Socialist]]s ignore the side of man that is of the spirit.  They can provide shelter, fill your belly with bacon and beans, treat you when you are ill, all the things that are guaranteed to a prisoner or a slave.  They don't understand that we dream - yes, even of some time owning a yacht.&amp;quot; -- [[President]] [[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9ut8fnmwVkwC&amp;amp;pg=PA91#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false|last1=Skinner|first1=Kiron K.|last2=Anderson|first2=Annelise A.|title=Stories in His Own Hand: The Everyday Wisdom of Ronald Reagan ; Edited with an Introduction and Commentary by Kiron K. Skinner, Annelise Anderson, Martin Anderson ; Foreword by George P. Shultz|date=2001|publisher=Simon and Schuster|isbn=9781416584506}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the [[income redistribution|equal sharing]] of misery.&amp;quot; -- [[Winston Churchill]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I've always doubted that the socialists had a leg to stand on intellectually&amp;quot; -- [[Friedrich Hayek]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;The trouble is with socialism, which resembles a form of [[mental illness]] more than it does a philosophy&amp;quot; -- [[L. Neil Smith]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Socialists cry &amp;quot;Power to the people&amp;quot;, and raise the clenched fist as they say it. We all know what they really mean — [[Nanny state|power over people]], [[Police state|power to the State]].&amp;quot; -- [[Margaret Thatcher]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;All socialism involves [[slavery]]&amp;quot; -- [[Herbert Spencer]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;Socialism is based on [[envy]] and eventually always creates a very powerful big government controlled by very mediocre people who envy any success and destroy it.&amp;quot; -- [[Vlad]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to ''consolidate'' and ''control'' the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all.&amp;quot;—Gary Allen &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=UuKnhw27vUwC&amp;amp;q=%22if+one+understands+that+socialism+is+not+a%22&amp;amp;dq=%22if+one+understands+that+socialism+is+not+a%22&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0CDEQ6AEwBGoVChMI9b6puNfryAIVxSQmCh2CHw7j None Dare Call It Conspiracy], page 33&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Big government]] [[Welfare state]] leads to [[socialist]] [[Nanny state]], leads to [[communist]] [[Police state]] - Don't think Socialism-Communism is incompatible with [[Islam]].&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control]] - key element to create a police state&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of atheist and agnostic pseudosciences]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Marxism and mysticism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joseph Stalin]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Dictatorship]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dictator]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[List of dictators]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Friendly dictator]]&lt;br /&gt;
** Adolf Hitler - [[Heinrich Himmler]], [[Vladimir Lenin]] - [[Leon Trotsky]] - [[Joseph Stalin]], [[Mao Zedong]] - [[Ho Chi Minh]] - [[Kim Jong-Il]] - [[Pol Pot]], [[Fidel Castro]] - [[Che Guevara]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Dictatorship of the proletariat]]: [[Class warfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[List of Communist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[List of Socialist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Death toll of communism]] via [[mass murder]] - [[genocide]] - [[concentration camp]] [[forced labor]] - [[extermination camp]] - [[firing squad]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Atheism and mass murder]]&lt;br /&gt;
** [[Coup d'état]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cult of personality]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Single-party state]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mobocracy]], [[Social Effects of the Theory of Evolution]], [[Anti-Semitism]], [[Communist Racism]], [[Holocaust]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nazi Party|National Socialist German Workers' Party]] (Nazi Party)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nazism and socialism]]: [[National Socialism]] - the Nazis were elitist [[Police state]] [[liberals]] not [[conservative]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Resisting Socialist Landfills‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Champagne socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
'''Contrast with:'''&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Libertarianism]] and [[Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[American values]] and [[Conservative values]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/etexts/hayekintellectuals.pdf The Intellectuals and Socialism], By F.A. Hayek, ''The University of Chicago Law Review'', (Spring 1949), pp.&amp;amp;nbsp;417–420, 421-423, 425-433. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9109587/socialism Socialism] Encyclopædia Britannica.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/socialism/ What Liberals Say - Category: Socialism], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
* Busky, Donald F. ''Communism in History and Theory: From Utopian Socialism to the Fall of the Soviet Union'' (2002) [http://www.amazon.com/Communism-History-Theory-Utopian-Socialism/dp/027597748X/ref=sr_1_24?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-24 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dougherty, Jude P. &amp;quot;Socialist Man: A Psychological Profile,&amp;quot; ''Modern Age'' Volume 46, Number 1-2; Winter/Spring 2004 [http://www.mmisi.org/ma/46_1-2/dougherty.pdf online edition], a conservative critique&lt;br /&gt;
*Laslett, John, ed. ''Failure of a Dream: Essays in the History of American Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lindemann, Albert S. ''A History of European Socialism'' (1984)&lt;br /&gt;
* Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Gary Marks. ''It Didn't Happen Here: Why Socialism Failed in the United States'' (2001), Lipset was a leading conservative scholar [http://www.amazon.com/Didnt-Happen-Here-Socialism-Failed/dp/0393322548/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1232396722&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Malia, Martin. ''Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia'' (1995) [http://www.amazon.com/Soviet-Tragedy-History-Socialism-Russia/dp/0684823136/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761853&amp;amp;sr=1-4 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Muravchik, Joshua. ''Heaven on Earth: The Rise and Fall of Socialism'' (2003) by conservative historian [http://www.amazon.com/Heaven-Earth-Rise-Fall-Socialism/dp/1893554783/ref=sr_1_21?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-21 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Novak, Michael. ''Capitalism and Socialism: A Theological Inquiry '' (1988) [http://www.amazon.com/Capitalism-Socialism-Theological-Michael-Novak/dp/0844721549/ref=sr_1_19?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1228761601&amp;amp;sr=1-19 excerpt and text search], by leading conservative scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Nove, Alec. ''An Economic History of the USSR 1917-1991'' (3rd ed. 1993) &lt;br /&gt;
* Pipes, Richard. ''Communism: A History'' (2003), by a leading conservative &lt;br /&gt;
* Suny, Ronald Grigor. ''The Soviet Experiment: Russia, the USSR, and the Successor States.'' (1998) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24265044# online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxist Terminology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Oppression]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Police State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Welfare State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sociology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worldviews]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Man-Made Disasters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Threats]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drubg</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_Kingdom&amp;diff=1354207</id>
		<title>United Kingdom</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=United_Kingdom&amp;diff=1354207"/>
		<updated>2017-06-15T23:30:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drubg: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           =''United Kingdom&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;of Great Britain&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;and Northern Ireland''&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =United kingdom rel87.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =UK location.png&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Union_jack.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =UK Royal Coat of Arms.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=London&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	=Constitutional monarchy&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=English&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=HM Queen [[Elizabeth II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =Theresa May&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =94,526 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =65,110,000&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=2016&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =$2.006 trillion&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=2006&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$35,051 (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Pound Sterling &lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =.uk&lt;br /&gt;
:''UK redirects here. For the institution of higher education, see [[University of Kentucky]].''&lt;br /&gt;
:''For the impact on left-wing policies on the UK and the rest of Europe, see [[European migrant crisis]].''&lt;br /&gt;
The '''United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland''' ('''UK''') is a sovereign [[state]] north-west of mainland [[Europe]]. It comprises [[England]], [[Scotland]] and [[Wales]], which occupy the island of [[Great Britain]], and [[Northern Ireland]] on the island of [[Ireland]]. It attained its current identity in 1922 after most of Ireland was granted independence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom is a constitutional monarchy. Its [[head of state]] is Queen [[Elizabeth II]], and its [[head of government]] is Prime Minister [[Theresa May]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom has lost the preeminence in the world that it enjoyed 100 years ago, due to its decline into [[socialism]], [[Darwinism]] and godlessness/[[atheism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~nfergus/publications/Economics%20Religion%20and%20the%20End%20of%20Europe%20as%20published%20in%20Ec%20Aff.pdf ECONOMICS, RELIGION AND THE DECLINE OF EUROPE] by the [[Harvard University]] historian Niall Ferguson &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/why-is-england-burning Why is England Burning?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Godlessness-has-doomed-Britain Godlessness has doomed Britain], [[Shmuley Boteach]],'' Jerusalem Post''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://creation.com/christianity-as-progress  A review of The Victory of Reason: How Christianity Led to Freedom, Capitalism, and Western Success by Rodney Stark, Random House, New York, 2005], reviewed by Lael Weinberger&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.heraldscotland.com/comment/columnists/scotland-still-has-a-job-on-its-hands-to-reverse-decline.21330686 Scotland still has a job on its hands to reverse decline], The Herald, Thursday 13 June 2013&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/census-reveals-huge-rise-in-number-of-non-religious-scots.22270874 Census reveals huge rise in number of non-religious Scots].'' The Herald'', Friday 27 September 2013&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/scotland/9594221/Scotlands-vitality-was-the-envy-of-the-world.html Scotland’s vitality was the envy of the world], ''The Telegraph'', By Allan Massie, 8:06PM BST 08 Oct 2012&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://blog.tifwe.org/the-protestant-work-ethic-alive-well-in-china/ The Protestant Work Ethic: Alive &amp;amp; Well…In China] By Hugh Whelchel on September 24, 2012&lt;br /&gt;
*The prominent investor Jim Rogers declared: &amp;quot;If you were smart at the start of the 19th century, you made your way to [[London]]. If you were smart at the start of the 20th century, you moved to New York. And if you are smart at the start of the 21st century, you will find your way to Asia.&amp;quot;[http://www.asiancenturyinstitute.com/international/198-jim-rogers-on-asia-singapore-and-life] It has fallen from having by far the world's strongest economy to a distant fifth place. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom is a member of the [[NATO]] and the [[United Nations]]. It is currently a member of the [[European Union]] although it is negotiating a departure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
British values, culture and institutions were spread throughout many parts of the world during the period of the [[British Empire]], 1600-1960, and British contributions to world culture include the English language, the [[parliament]]ary form of government, the [[Church of England|Anglican]] Church (&amp;quot;Church of England&amp;quot;), a tradition of personal liberty, and the [[common law]] legal system. &lt;br /&gt;
Note, however, that the United Kingdom does not have the constitutional [[free speech]] protections or an energetic [[Christian]] culture that exist in the [[United States]], because there is not a codified constitution - though limited speech is proved via the Human Rights Act of 1998. However various acts mean there is free speech, similar to that in the [[United States]]. Certain county councils, like Salford Quays in the United Kingdom have issued 'public space protection orders' that fine people £50 for swearing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2015, the UK was ranked 12th on the World Democracy index, above countries such as the US and France, and below those like Germany and Canada.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://democracyranking.org/wordpress/rank/democracy-ranking-2015/ World's Democracy Index]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Name==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:London Thames Sunset panorama 2008.jpg|thumb|left|London - Thames panorama.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The official name of the nation (since 1927) is ''The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From 1801 to 1927 the official name was ''The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The full official name is seldom used except in very formal or legal documents.  The short version for historical topics is either &amp;quot;Britain&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Great Britain.&amp;quot; The short version for recent events (since the 1970s) is &amp;quot;United Kingdom&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;UK&amp;quot; The adjective is always '''&amp;quot;British&amp;quot;'''.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain was part of the [[British Empire]], which has become the &amp;quot;British Commonwealth&amp;quot;, and is mostly a discussion club. Britain has a few scattered minor possessions, including [[Gibraltar]], but gave up its last important colony—[[Hong Kong]]—in 1997.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Westminster in the evening.jpg|thumb|280px|Westminster in the evening.]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''England''' is the largest of the four components of the United Kingdom.  &amp;quot;England&amp;quot; was often used to stand for the nation in older literature published before 1970. However use of &amp;quot;England&amp;quot; to refer to the entire country is now sometimes considered offensive by many citizens of the other three member countries and is thus discouraged.&lt;br /&gt;
* The standard language of the UK is English; [[Welsh]] has parity in Wales, and [[Gaelic]] is widely used on official documents, roadsigns, etc. in remote Gaelic-speaking areas of western Scotland.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacColl (2008) explores the use of the term 'Britain' in English, French, and Latin texts from the 12th century to the 16th. The term was flexible, used in a variety of ways (geographically, politically, and ethnically), and not always indicative of any specific meaning. The English at first tended to conflate 'Britain' with England or the southern portion of the island of Great Britain, though the term 'Greater Britain' was applied starting in the 14th century to refer to the entire island. The Scottish, beginning in the 15th century, used the term in the modern sense - as reflective of the entire island of Great Britain and the 'polity' of England, Wales, and Scotland. This latter usage paved the way for the relatively smooth ideological transition after the 1707 Acts of Union.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alan  MacColl, &amp;quot;The Meaning of 'Britain' in Medieval and Early Modern England.&amp;quot;  ''Journal of British Studies'' 2006 45(2): 248-269&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anthem===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The national anthem of the UK is currently ''[[God Save the Queen]]''. Should a male heir accede to the throne, the anthem will become &amp;quot;God Save the King&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This same melody is also sung by American schoolchildren (with different words) as &amp;quot;[[My Country, 'Tis of Thee]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The constituent nations have their own unofficial anthems. In the case of Wales, this is ''Hen Wlad Fy Nhadau'' (''Land of My Fathers''), and for Scotland it is ''Flower of Scotland''. England does not have its own distinctive anthem in the same way, but at sporting events in which England is competing as a separate nation, [[Edward Elgar]]'s patriotic song ''Land of Hope and Glory'' is sometimes used (although ''God Save the Queen'' is more commonly used). Additionally the hymn &amp;quot;Jerusalem&amp;quot; has a large number of supporters in England as an alternative to, or replacement for, the national anthem. In Northern Ireland, the Protestant and Catholic communities respectively use ''God Save the Queen'' and ''Amhran na bhFiann'', the Irish national anthem. ''Londonderry Air'' is often used as the anthem for Northern Ireland competitors in sporting events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tower Bridge London.jpg|thumb|340px|Tower Bridge, London.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom's population in 2004 surpassed 60 million—the third-largest in the European Union. Its overall population density is one of the highest in the world. Almost one-third of the population lives in England's prosperous and fertile southeast and is predominantly urban and suburban—with about 7.2 million in the capital of London, which remains the largest city in Europe. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A net total of 408,000 people were added to the UK population in 2008, the largest numerical increase since 1972.  This was partly due to the highest fertility rate in more than three decades. More than half of the increase in births last year was due to non-UK born mothers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an ever-increasing aging population with the number of people over 85 now at a record 1.3 million, the equivalent of one in every 50 people. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Royal College of Music 2007.jpg|thumb|left|Royal College of Music.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom's high literacy rate (99%) is attributable to universal public education introduced for the primary level in 1870 and secondary level in 1900. Education is mandatory from ages 5 through 16, although this is in the process of being raised to 18 for England and Wales. &amp;quot;Public&amp;quot; schools are elite private prep schools, such as [[Eton]] and [[Rugby School|Rugby]], attended by youth whose families can afford to pay high tuition rates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All state-funded schools in the UK are required to start the day with a collective assembly that is 'wholly or mainly of a broadly Christian character',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=387464 Times Educational Supplement]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; although this is not always adhered to and there are small numbers of state-funded [[Muslim]], [[Jew]]ish and [[Hindu]] schools.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About thirty-six percent of British students go on to post-secondary education.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Higher education has been a specialty for over 500 years at Oxbridge ([[Oxford University|Oxford]] and [[Cambridge University|Cambridge]]), with new &amp;quot;red brick&amp;quot; universities added in the 19th century and many others in the late 20th century. Universities contribute £33 billion a year to the economy.  Britain has a strong attraction for international students, with 342,000 attending in 2007 (compared to 672,000 in the U.S. and 183,000 in Australia). They spend £1.5 billion in tuition in Britain annually, plus another £0.4 billion off campus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to an early-2017 report, universities in the UK have high levels of censorship and low levels of [[free speech]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Singman, Brooke (March 14, 2017). [http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/03/14/free-speech-under-attack-at-uk-colleges-report-says.html Free speech under attack at UK colleges, report says]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved March 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, many UK schools (about 120 in May 2017) adopted a program that promotes in indoctrinates students with the [[homosexual agenda]] in all areas of curriculum and in other ways such as unisex uniforms and the removal of terms such as &amp;quot;boy&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;girl&amp;quot; from school vocabulary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hale, Virginia (May 17, 2017). [http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/05/17/120-uk-schools-lgbt-curriculum/ LGBT Curriculum Programme, Gender Neutral Uniforms Adopted By 120 UK Schools]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 17, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Demographics===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Youth UK.JPG|thumb|British youth.]]&lt;br /&gt;
A group of islands close to continental Europe, the British Isles have been subject to many invasions and migrations, especially from Scandinavia and the continent, including Roman occupation for several centuries. Contemporary Britons are descended mainly from the varied ethnic stocks that settled there before the 11th century. The pre-Celtic, Celtic, Roman, Anglo-Saxon, and Norse influences were blended in Great Britain under the Normans, Scandinavian Vikings who had lived in Northern France. Although Celtic languages persist in Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, as well as Cornwall in south-west England, the predominant language is English, which is primarily a blend of Anglo-Saxon and Norman French. &lt;br /&gt;
*Population (2007 est.): 60.8 million.&lt;br /&gt;
*Annual population growth rate (2007 est.): 0.275%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Major ethnic groups: White British 91%, Irish 2%, West Indian and African 3%, South Asian 3%, others 1%.&lt;br /&gt;
*Major religions: Church of England (Anglican), Roman Catholic, Church of Scotland (Presbyterian), Muslim.&lt;br /&gt;
*Major languages: English&lt;br /&gt;
*Minority languages: Welsh, Gaelic, Lowland Scots (including Ulster Scots), Cornish.&lt;br /&gt;
*Education: Years compulsory—12. Attendance—nearly 100%. Literacy—99%. &lt;br /&gt;
*Health: Infant mortality rate (2007 est.)--5.01/1,000. Life expectancy (2007 est.)--males 76.23 yrs.; females 81.3 yrs.; total 78.7 years&lt;br /&gt;
*Work force (2007, 31.1 million): Services—80.4%; industry—18.2%; agriculture—1.4%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnic tensions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain is home to 2.4 million Muslims from numerous ethnicities. This population is growing 10 times faster than the national average. Regarded as one of the most tolerant countries in Europe, Britain struggles with questions of Islamic integration, as well as the psychological aftermath of the July 2005 suicide bombings on London’s public transport system carried out by young Britons of Pakistani descent, which left 52 people dead and over 700 injured.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Religion===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Canterbury Cathedral.jpg|thumb|left|350px|Canterbury Cathedral (photographed during 1890-1900).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Religious faith, according to a 2011 survey, has declined sharply in Britain over the last two decades. Now only 42% of people describe themselves as Christian, as opposed to 66% in 1990. Most of the decline is due to a drift away from the Church of England, it is claimed, with only 20% claiming allegiance, down from 40%. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2003 the Office of National Statistics estimated 29% of the population identified with Anglicanism, 10% with the Catholic Church, and 14% with other Protestant churches. A 2007 survey reported that the number of Catholics (mostly Irish) attending Sunday services has overtaken the number of Anglicans doing so. A September 2006 English Church Census reported that Methodists were decreasing as a percentage of the population, while members of the Church of Jesus Christ Latter-day Saints (Mormons), Pentecostal churches, many churches from Africa, and the Eastern Orthodox Church, almost entirely immigrants, were increasing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;According to [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108478.htm U.S. State Department Report, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Individuals with no religious belief comprised 21% of the population in 2009. Muslims comprise 3% of the population. The Muslim community is predominantly South Asian in origin, but other groups from the Arabian Peninsula, Africa, Southeast Asia, and the Levant are represented. In addition, there is a growing number of indigenous converts. Although estimates vary, the Government places the number of mosques in the whole country at one thousand. Groups comprising 1% or less of the population include Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, and Buddhists. Individuals from Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim, and Sikh backgrounds are concentrated in London and other large urban areas, primarily in England. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attendance at religious services was significantly different from the number of adherents. According to a report released on May 8, 2008, by Religious Trends, only 4 million Christians attend services on a regular basis (defined as at least once a month) in the country. These figures do not include Northern Ireland, where higher%ages reportedly attend both Catholic (more than 60%) and Protestant (more than 35%) services. The Religious Trends report stated that more than 50% of Muslims regularly worship at mosques. Figures for Jews and other religious groups were unavailable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious affiliation was not evenly distributed among ethnicities. According to the 2001 census, approximately 70% of the white population described themselves as Christians. Nearly 75% of black Caribbean respondents stated that they were Christians, as did 70% of black Africans. Meanwhile, 45% of Indians were Hindus and 29% were Sikhs. Approximately 92% of Pakistanis and Bangladeshis were Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Northern Ireland, where divisions between nationalists and unionists evolved largely along religious lines, the 2001 census showed that 53.1% were Protestants and 43.8% were Catholics. Many Catholics and Protestants continued to live in segregated communities in Northern Ireland, although many middle-class neighborhoods were mixed communities. The policy of the Government remained one of promotion of religious tolerance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two established (or state) churches—The [[Church of England]] (Anglican) and the [[Church of Scotland]] (Presbyterian). The Act of Settlement, enacted in 1688, states that no Catholic, or person married to a Catholic, may ascend the throne.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Religion in schools====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Government provides financial support—up to 90% of the total capital costs of the buildings and 100% of running costs, including teachers' salaries - to sectarian educational institutions that are commonly referred to as &amp;quot;faith schools&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Matthew Boulton College.jpg|thumb|Matthew Boulton College.]] &lt;br /&gt;
The Government also helps fund the repair and maintenance of all listed places of worship for religious groups nationwide and contributes to the budget of the Church Conservation Trust, which preserves &amp;quot;redundant&amp;quot; Church of England buildings of architectural or historic significance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Government has not classified the Church of Scientology as a religious institution and therefore has not granted the organization recognition for charitable status. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 30% of state schools had a religious character. Nearly all of the 6,949 &amp;quot;faith schools&amp;quot; are associated with Christian denominations, although there are 31 Jewish, 7 Islamic, and 2 Sikh schools. An additional two Jewish, three Islamic, and two Sikh schools have also been tentatively approved by the Government to open. In addition, several hundred independent schools of a religious nature receive no state support but must meet government quality standards. Controversy arose in 2006 over 100 Islamic schools when an Office of Standards in Education (Ofsted) evaluation of these schools showed many were &amp;quot;little more than places where the Koran was recited.&amp;quot; The schools were given time to correct their deficiencies. A review is due in 2010. Some Christian faith schools also faced controversy. Some were accused of not following the national curriculum in science, teaching creationism instead. During the reporting period, a further controversy erupted when it was learned that some faith schools were not following an &amp;quot;open&amp;quot; admission policy as required by law, denying admission to both special needs children and those outside the faith of the school administrators. The Catholic Church and the Church of England have an agreement to voluntarily accept up to 25% of places for pupils from another religious group or no religious group. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Almost all schools in Northern Ireland receive state support. More than 90% of students attended schools that were either predominantly Catholic or Protestant. Integrated schools served approximately 5% of school-age children whose families voluntarily chose this option, often after overcoming significant obstacles to provide the resources to start a new school and demonstrate its sustainability for 3 years before government funding begins. Demand for places in integrated schools outweighed the limited number of places available. The May 8, 2007, devolution, or granting of power, authorized the Northern Ireland Assembly to decide on academic selection. Now there are more than 50 integrated schools, and the new Government permits existing schools to petition to change from sectarian to integrated. More petition for that status than are granted it. Some have accused the Government of a go-slow approach to avoid sectarian animus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The law requires religious education for all children, ages 3 to 19, in publicly maintained schools. In England and Wales it forms part of the core curriculum in accordance with the Education Reform Act of 1988. In Scotland, religious education of some sort is mandated by the Education Act of 1980. However, the shape and content of religious instruction throughout the country is decided on a local basis. Locally agreed syllabi are required to reflect the predominant place of Christianity while taking into account the teachings and practices of other principal religions in the country. Syllabuses must be nondenominational and refrain from attempting to convert pupils. Schools with a religious designation follow a syllabus drawn up by the school governors according to the trust deed of the school. All parents have the legal right to request that their children not participate in religious education, but the school must approve this request.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daily collective prayer or worship of &amp;quot;a wholly or mainly of a broadly Christian character&amp;quot; is practiced in schools in England and Wales, a requirement that may be waived for students who obtain permission of the school authorities. The Education and Inspections Act 2006 permits sixth form students (generally 16-19-year-olds) to withdraw themselves from worship without their parents' permission or action. This new law does not exempt sixth form students from religious education classes. Non-Christian worship is permitted with approval of the authorities. Teachers have the right not to participate in collective worship, without prejudice, unless they work for a faith school. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After several controversial court decisions prohibiting full-face veils in school (but not head scarves) and the wearing of a Christian chastity ring, the Department of Education provided guidance that advises schools to &amp;quot;… act reasonably in accommodating religious requirements,&amp;quot; under human rights legislation. Some Muslim groups, including the Islamic Human Rights Commission, said it was inappropriate for the Government to provide guidance that regulated Muslim communities in matters concerning the expression of their religious beliefs. But it is also legally possible under the act, according to the guidance, to have a school uniform policy that &amp;quot;restricts the freedom of pupils to manifest their religion&amp;quot; on the grounds of health and safety and the &amp;quot;protection of the rights and freedoms of others.&amp;quot; The Government's guidance is meant to remind &amp;quot;head teachers&amp;quot; to act with a degree of sensitivity when considering decisions that will impact the cultural complexion of their communities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Census====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the 2011 Census the religious make-up of the UK at that time was:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; cellspacing=0 cellpadding=3&lt;br /&gt;
|+'''Religions in United Kingdom'''&lt;br /&gt;
!Belief                &lt;br /&gt;
!Thousands          &lt;br /&gt;
!Proportion &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christian                 ||29,000           ||51.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|No Religion                 ||9104            ||15.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Muslim                      ||1591             ||2.7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hindu                            ||559    ||1.0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sikh                            ||336    ||0.6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jewish                           ||267    ||0.5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Other                            ||179    ||0.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Buddhist                         ||152    ||0.3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pagan &amp;amp; Wicca                     ||40    ||0.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Total religious          ||45,163   ||76.8&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|No answer                       ||4289    ||7.3&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The answers were distorted by an internet campaign just prior to the census, encouraging people to actually question religion that claimed that if at least 50,000 people stated their religion as 'Jedi Knight' it would be officially classified as a religion. This was not true, though the Office of National Statistics does aggregate very small religions into the 'Other' category whereas a religion of 50,000 would be itemised separately. This separate listing does not constitute any form of official recognition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that non-practising Christians and the non-religious group are growing in the UK and Europe. At the same time, there is growth in the Islamic  group due to immigration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two of the four states of the United Kingdom, England and Scotland, have official state religions. The [[Church of England]] is the official religion of England and the (Presbyterian) Church of Scotland is the official religion of Scotland. The (Anglican) Church of Ireland was [[disestablished]] in 1871 and the (Anglican) Church of Wales was disestablished in 1920, whereupon it was renamed the [[Church ''in'' Wales]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Crown Dependencies===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A number of the smaller [[British Isles]], most importantly [[Jersey]], [[Guernsey]] and the [[Isle of Man]] are '[[Crown dependencies|British Crown Dependencies]]' and not members of the UK. Their governments are independent of that of the UK other than foreign and defense policy (the UK government retains the legal power to overrule the governments of the Dependencies, but this power has not been exercised since 1967), and they are not members of the [[European Union]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sports and Pastimes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Wembley Stadium.jpg|thumb|230px|Wembley Stadium.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the most popular [[sport]]s in the world today were developed or codified in the UK. These include [[soccer|football]] (which is called ''soccer'' in North America), [[cricket]], [[Rugby (Sport)|rugby]], [[tennis]], [[hockey]], [[baseball]] and [[golf]]. The UK is represented in international competitions by the individual nations (such as in football, the one-day form of cricket and rugby) and by the whole of the UK in other sports (such as [[athletics]], golf and tennis). The Test cricket team is that of 'England &amp;amp; Wales' (colloquially, just 'England') but from time to time has had Scottish and Irish players.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The UK remains a major sporting force both in competition and the administration of sport. It is dominant in several Olympic sports, notably cycling, rowing and sailing and a leading force in cricket, rugby union, and golf.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Certain venues have their own distinct and historical recognition and host a number of international competitions. These include Wimbledon for tennis, Silverstone for motor racing, and St Andrews for golf. There are several major venues for football, rugby and cricket.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Domestic sport is dominated by football with one of the strongest and most popular leagues in the world - the Premier League. This league is sponsored by Barclays Bank, so has the official name &amp;quot;Barclays Premier League&amp;quot;. Many of the Premier League's teams are well known outside the United Kingdom, especially the &amp;quot;big four&amp;quot; (Manchester United, Arsenal, Chelsea and Liverpool) and maintain followings around the world. Cricket and both codes of rugby also have strong and popular domestic leagues. Other popular sports include snooker, rowing, golf, tennis, athletics, cycling, darts, horse racing, and motor racing. These most popular sports are well covered by both the print press and television.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some sports which are more popular in other countries such as volleyball, handball, American football and basketball have small but dedicated followings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[U.K.]] is also renowned for its music, and is the home of bands like [[The Beatles]], [[Rolling Stones]], [[Pink Floyd]], [[The Who]], [[Oasis]], [[Coldplay]] and [[Radiohead]], as well as festivals such as [[Creamfields]], [[Isle of White]] Festival and [[Glastonbury]]. London traditionally is the world centre for recordings of classical music and the annual &amp;quot;London Proms&amp;quot; concerts are recorded world wide. The &amp;quot;Last Night at the Proms&amp;quot; is a major &amp;quot;Television Event&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also [[British politics]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jewel House guard in the Tower of London.JPG|thumb|200px|Jewel House guard in the Tower of London.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Nationalist movements exist in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, seeking (in the case of Scottish and Welsh nationalists) to dissolve the United Kingdom and to win independence for their respective territories, and in the case of Northern Ireland nationalists and republicans to create a sovereign united Ireland. At the present time, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have their own legislatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom does not have a written constitution (even though the [[Magna Carta]] is the oldest basis for constitutional law in the world and the basis for numerous other countries such as the U.S.). The equivalent body of law is based on statute, common law, and &amp;quot;traditional rights&amp;quot;. Changes may come about formally through new acts of Parliament, informally through the acceptance of new practices and usage, or by judicial precedents. Although Parliament has the theoretical power to make or repeal any law, in actual practice the weight of 700 years of tradition restrains arbitrary actions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Executive power rests nominally with the monarch but actually is exercised by a committee of ministers (cabinet) selected from among the members of the House of Commons and, less frequently, the House of Lords. The prime minister is normally the leader of the largest party in the House of Commons, and can remain in office for so long as he or she has the support of a majority in that body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Parliament==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Westminster palace Charles Barry.jpg|left|380px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Parliament was authorized in the [[Magna Carta]] (1215), and first summoned by King Edward I in 1296, making it one of the oldest governing bodies in the world.  Parliament represents the entire country, and can legislate for the whole or for any constituent part or combination of parts. Elections are called by the Prime Minister, but the maximum length of a parliament is usually 5 years (except in wartime). The focus of legislative power is the 646 member [[House of Commons]], which has sole jurisdiction over finance. Normally the government—the Prime Minister and cabinet with their supporting MPs—have full control of the House. If they lose control an new general election may be held. The House of Lords, although shorn of most of its powers, can still review, amend, or delay temporarily any bills except those relating to the budget.  In 1999, the government removed the automatic right of hereditary peers to hold seats in the House of Lords. The current house consists of appointed life peers who hold their seats for life and 92 hereditary peers who will hold their seats only until final reforms have been agreed upon and implemented. The judiciary is independent of the legislative and executive branches, but cannot review the constitutionality of legislation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the House of Commons are elected to represent specific geographic constituencies. Members are elected on a &amp;quot;First past the post&amp;quot; system as opposed to proportional representation or other electoral systems.  In effect this means that a third party with less than  25% of the vote typically obtains very few seats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Constituent countries==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scottish Eilean Donan castle.jpg|thumb|300px|Scottish Eilean Donan castle.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The separate identities of each of the United Kingdom's constituent parts are also reflected in their respective governmental structures. Up until the recent devolution of power to Scotland and Wales, a cabinet minister (the Secretary of State for Wales) handled Welsh affairs at the national level with the advice of a broadly representative council for Wales. Scotland maintains, as it did before union with England, different systems of law (Roman-French), education, local government, judiciary, and national church (the Church of Scotland instead of the Church of England). In addition, separate departments grouped under a Secretary of State for Scotland, who also is a cabinet member, handled most domestic matters. In late 1997, however, following approval of referenda by Scottish and Welsh voters (though only narrowly in Wales), the British Government introduced legislation to establish a Scottish Parliament and a Welsh Assembly. The first elections for the two bodies were held May 6, 1999. The Welsh Assembly opened on May 26, and the Scottish Parliament opened on July 1, 1999. The devolved legislatures have largely taken over most of the functions previously performed by the Scottish and Welsh offices. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Northern Ireland had its own Parliament and prime minister from 1921 to 1973, when the British Government imposed direct rule in order to deal with the deteriorating political and security situation. From 1973, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, based in London, was responsible for the region, including efforts to resolve the issues that lay behind the &amp;quot;the troubles.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the mid-1990s, gestures toward peace encouraged by successive British governments and by President Clinton began to open the door for restored local government in Northern Ireland. An Irish Republican Army (IRA) cease-fire and nearly 2 years of multiparty negotiations, led by former U.S. Senator George Mitchell, resulted in the Good Friday Agreement of 10 April 1998, which was subsequently approved by majorities in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Key elements of the agreement include devolved government, a commitment of the parties to work toward &amp;quot;total disarmament of all paramilitary organisations,&amp;quot; police reform, and enhanced mechanisms to guarantee human rights and equal opportunity. The Good Friday Agreement also called for formal cooperation between the Northern Ireland institutions and the Government of the Republic of Ireland, and it established the British-Irish Council, which includes representatives of the British and Irish Governments as well as the devolved Governments of Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. Devolved government was reestablished in Northern Ireland in December 1999. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Agreement (more commonly known as the &amp;quot;Good Friday Agreement&amp;quot;, and more rarely as the Belfast Agreement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nio.gov.uk/index/key-issues/the-agreement.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) was reached on Friday, April 10, 1998 in Belfast and provides for a 108-member elected Assembly, overseen by a 12-minister Executive Committee (cabinet) in which unionists and nationalists share leadership responsibility. Northern Ireland elects 18 representatives to the Westminster Parliament in London. However, the five Sinn Féin Members of Parliament (MPs), who won seats in the 2004 election, have refused to claim their seats. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Political conditions===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[David Cameron]] became Prime Minister on May 11, 2010, after [[Gordon Brown]] resigned, and led a [[Conservative Party|Con]]-[[Liberal Democrats|Dem]] coalition in 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8676607.stm &amp;quot;David Cameron and Nick Clegg pledge 'united' coalition&amp;quot;] ''BBC News'', Election 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2015, a general election was called&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Under the provisions of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 (c. 14), parliamentary elections in the UK must be held every five years, beginning in 2015. The Act received Royal Assent on 15 September 2011. Fixed-term Parliaments, where general elections ordinarily take place in accordance with a schedule set far in advance, were part of the Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition agreement which was produced after the 2010 general election.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Cameron's Conservative Party won a majority of seats, against all odds.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/11599600/How-did-the-Conservatives-win-the-general-election.html &amp;quot;How did the Conservatives win the general election?&amp;quot;] ''The Daily Telegraph''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It must be noted that despite its name, many supporters of the European Union and homosexual &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot; are members of the Conservative Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Membership in the European Union===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Conservative Party|Conservative]] government of [[Edward Heath|Sir Edward Heath]] took the UK into the [[European Union]] in 1973. The [[Labour Party]] under [[Harold Wilson]] won the 1974 general elections and due to splits within the party, called the only national [[referendum]] asking the people if they wanted to stay in the Union. The &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot; vote won by a margin of approximately two to one. The Labour and Conservative parties have since had deep divisions over Union membership. Labour's 1983 manifesto promised to leave the Union, and whilst the Conservative party have never pledged to leave the Union, a growing band of &amp;quot;Eurosceptics&amp;quot; threatened to tear the party apart in the 1990s. The Labour, Conservative and  Scottish National parties wish to stay in the Union although disagree over the level of integration, but smaller parties such as the [[UK Independence Party]] and the Referendum Party campaigned on the single issue of sovereignty being lost to the Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A referendum to [[Brexit|leave the EU]] was successfully held on June 23, 2016. In accordance with a [[Conservative Party]] manifesto commitment, the legal basis for a referendum was established by the passage of the European Union Referendum Act 2015 by the British Parliament. It was the third plebiscite held throughout the United Kingdom, and the second time the British electorate had been asked to vote on the issue of European Union membership: the first was held in 1975, when it was known as the EEC. Membership was approved in that referendum by 67% of voters – but the nature of the EU changed dramatically since then.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adrian Williamson, [http://www.historyandpolicy.org/policy-papers/papers/the-case-for-brexit-lessons-from-1960s-and-1970s The Case for Brexit: Lessons from the 1960s and 1970s], History and Policy (2015).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The referendum result, to leave the European Union, was a historic victory for conservative eurosceptics, and the next day, liberal prime minister [[David Cameron]], who had supported EU membership despite its many flaws and no real benefits, resigned.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36615028 Brexit: David Cameron to quit after UK votes to leave EU]. ''BBC''. June 24, 2016. Retrieved December 15, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gross, Jenny; Winning, Nicholas (June 24, 2016). [http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-s-brexit-vote-throws-political-scene-into-disarray-1466786724 Brexit Vote Throws U.K. Political Scene Into Disarray]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved December 15, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Another winner was conservative Eurosceptic [[Nigel Farage]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Defense and Foreign Relations==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:11943452 115b299206.jpg|right|240px]]&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom is a founding member of the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] (NATO) and is one of NATO's major European maritime, air, and land powers; it ranks third among NATO countries in total defence expenditure. The United Kingdom has been a member of the European Community (now European Union) since 1973. In the United Nations, the United Kingdom is a permanent member of the Security Council. The U.K. held the Presidency of the G-8 during 2005; it held the EU Presidency from July to December 2005. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The British Armed Forces are charged with protecting the United Kingdom and its overseas territories, promoting Britain's wider security interests, and supporting international peacekeeping efforts. The 37,000-member Royal Navy, which includes 6,000 Royal Marine commandos, is in charge of the United Kingdom's independent strategic nuclear arm, which consists of four Trident missile submarines. The British Army, consisting of approximately 99,200 personnel, the Royal Air Force, with 42,000 personnel, along with the Royal Navy and Royal Marines, are active and regular participants in NATO and other coalition operations. Approximately 9% of the British Armed Forces is female, and 4% of British forces represent ethnic minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Royal Naval college UK.jpg|thumb|center|380px|Royal Naval College.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Iraq===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.K. was the United States' main coalition partner under the designation Operation TELIC. Under UN Security Council Resolution 1483, the U.K. also shared with the United States responsibility for civil administration in Iraq and was an active participant in the Coalition Provisional Authority before the handover of Iraqi sovereignty on June 28, 2004. Britain's participation in the Iraq war and its aftermath remains a domestically controversial issue.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Iraqi oil supply was considered to be 'vital' to British interests. The British Government saw Iraqi oil as &amp;quot;vital&amp;quot; to the UK's long-term energy security, and the effective privatisation of its oil industry was central to the post-invasion plan for the country, according to previously unseen Whitehall documents. [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/iraqi-oil-supply-was-considered-to-be-vital-to-british-interests-2270072.html] ''The Independent.'' &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Iraq Inquiry is conducted to identify lessons that can be learned from the Iraq conflict; the inquiry is concerned over Mr. Blair's evidence on the legal advice he received before agreeing to join the invasion, and the timing of the decision to go to war. [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/chilcot-to-grill-blair-on-how-he-misled-iraq-war-inquiry-2185725.html] The Chair of the Inquiry, Sir John Chilcot (1939) was Staff Counsellor to the Security and Intelligence Agencies (1999-2004) and the National Criminal Intelligence Service (2002–06).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Afghanistan===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain stood shoulder to shoulder with the United States following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in the U.S., and its military forces are part of the coalition force in Afghanistan. The British force in [[Afghanistan War|Afghanistan]] is at 9,000 in late 2009 and will rise by an extra 500 troops in 2010. British forces are primarily based in the Helmand region, where they are on the front line in the war against continued Taliban operations. In addition, Britain has contributed more than £500 million to Afghan reconstruction—the second-largest donor after the U.S.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Israel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain has shown a greater willingness than the United States to criticize the Israelis over settlements and what some call the disproportionate responses to provocations from Gaza and southern Lebanon. (Jewish Labour MP Gerald Kaufman is among the most vocal.) Like his predecessors, both Labour and Conservative, former Foreign Secretary Milliband has been unequivocal: &amp;quot;Settlements are illegal under international law,&amp;quot; he told Parliament in 2008; &amp;quot;They are a major blockage to peace in the Middle East on the basis of a two-state solution.&amp;quot; His successor William Hague, on 20 March 2011, &amp;quot;expressed our serious concern over the recent announcement of 400 new housing units in the West Bank. Continued settlements run contrary to peace.” A BBC poll in March 2011 found that 14% of British subjects have a generally positive opinion of Israel while 66% have a generally negative opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Relations with the United States===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Send_a_gun_to_a_British_home.jpg|thumb|right|[[Second Amendment]]-supporting [[American]] [[citizen]]s gifted their [[firearm]]s to [[gun free zone]]-[[gun control]] supporting British citizens during [[World War II]] via [[The American Committee for the Defense of British Homes]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom is one of the United States' closest allies, and British foreign policy emphasises close coordination with the United States. Bilateral cooperation reflects the common language, ideals, and democratic practices of the two nations. Relations were strengthened by the countries' alliances during both World Wars, and its role as a founding member of NATO, in the Korean conflict, in the Persian Gulf War, and in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The United Kingdom and the United States continually consult on foreign policy issues and global problems and share major foreign and security policy objectives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United Kingdom is the fifth-largest market for U.S. goods exports after Canada, Mexico, Japan, and China, and the sixth-largest supplier of U.S. imports after Canada, China, Mexico, Japan, and Germany. U.S. exports of goods and services to the United Kingdom in 2006 totaled $92 billion, while U.S. imports from the U.K. totaled $93 billion. The United States has had a trade deficit with the United Kingdom since 1998. The United Kingdom is a large source of foreign tourists in the United States. In 2005, 3.4 million U.S. residents visited the United Kingdom, while 4.2 million U.K. residents visited the United States. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and the United Kingdom share the world's largest foreign direct investment partnership. U.S. investment in the United Kingdom reached $324 billion in 2005, while U.K. direct investment in the U.S. totaled $282 billion. This investment sustains more than 1 million American jobs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:London.jpg|thumb|left|280px|London's financial center.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Britain has been hard hit by the [[Recession of 2008]], with its major banks taken over or subsidized by the government.  Real gross domestic product declined by 4.6% in 2009, and is expected to rise by 0.6% before 2010 and probably will continue to increase by 1% in 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain has the fifth-largest economy in the world, is the second-largest economy in the European Union, and is a major international trading power. A highly developed, diversified, market-based economy with extensive social welfare services provides most residents with a high standard of living. Unemployment and inflation levels are amongst the lowest within the European Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1979, the British Government has privatised most state-owned companies, including British Steel, British Airways, British Telecom, British Coal, British Aerospace, and British Gas, although in some cases the government retains a &amp;quot;golden share&amp;quot; in these companies. The previous Labour government continued the privatisation policy of its Conservative predecessor, particularly by encouraging &amp;quot;public-private partnerships&amp;quot; (partial privatisation) in such areas as the London Underground. The economy of the United Kingdom is now primarily based on private enterprise, accounting for approximately four-fifths of employment and output. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bluewater Shopping Centre, Kent, England Crop 2009.jpg|thumb|440px|Bluewater Shopping Centre, Kent, 2009.]]&lt;br /&gt;
London ranks alongside New York as a leading international financial centre. London's financial exports contribute greatly to the United Kingdom's balance of payments. Ratings agencies rank the United Kingdom's banking sector as one of the strongest in the world and its banks are amongst the most profitable in the G-8. It is a global leader in emissions trading and is home to the Alternative Investment Market (AIM). It is also a government priority to make London the leading center of Islamic finance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Britain is the European Union's only significant energy exporter. It is also one of the world's largest energy consumers, and most analysts predict a shift in U.K. status from net exporter to net importer of energy by 2020, possibly sooner. Oil production in the U.K. is levelling off. While North Sea natural gas production continues to rise, gains may be offset by ever-increasing consumption. North Sea oil and gas exploration activities are shifting to smaller fields and to increments of larger, developed fields, presenting opportunities for smaller, independent energy operators to become active in North Sea production. &lt;br /&gt;
*GDP (at current market prices, 2007 est.): US$1.93 trillion.&lt;br /&gt;
*Annual growth rate (2009 est.): -4.6%&lt;br /&gt;
*Per capita GDP (2006 est.): US$31,800. &lt;br /&gt;
*Natural resources: Coal, oil, natural gas.&lt;br /&gt;
*Agriculture (1.1% of GDP): Products—cereals, oilseed, potatoes, vegetables, cattle, sheep, poultry, fish.&lt;br /&gt;
*Industry: Types—steel, heavy engineering and metal manufacturing, textiles, motor vehicles and aircraft, construction (5.2% of GDP), electronics, chemicals.&lt;br /&gt;
*Trade (2006 est.): Exports of goods and services—US$468.8 billion: manufactured goods, fuels, chemicals; food, beverages, tobacco. Major markets—U.S., European Union. Imports of goods and services—US$603 billion: manufactured goods, machinery, fuels, foodstuffs. Major suppliers—U.S., European Union, Japan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Currency===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The currency of the United Kingdom is the [[Pound|Pound Sterling]], commonly called Pound and written £ or GBP, divided into 100 New Pence (now commonly just called pence or 'p'). Traditionally the UK had a complicated triple currency structure of 20 [[shilling]]s to the Pound and 12 &amp;quot;old pence&amp;quot; (represented by a &amp;quot;d&amp;quot; from the Roman ''denarius'') to the shilling, making a total of 240 pence to the Pound. This system was abandoned in 1971 due to difficulties with computerised accounting systems, in favour of the current [[decimal]] system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The UK has never joined the [[Euro]] zone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Stonehenge.jpg|thumb|left|Stonehenge.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Roman invasion of Britain in 43AD and most of Britain's subsequent incorporation into the Roman Empire stimulated development and brought more active contacts with the rest of Europe. However, there was no permanent Roman imprint apart from roads and locations for cities. As Rome's strength declined, the country again was exposed to invasion—including the pivotal incursions of the Angles, Saxons, and Jutes in the fifth and sixth centuries AD—up to the Norman conquest in 1066. Norman rule effectively ensured Britain's safety from further intrusions; certain institutions, which remain characteristic of Britain, could develop. Among these are a political, administrative, cultural, and economic centre in London; a separate but established church and  distinctive and distinguished university education. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Union====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both Wales and Scotland were independent kingdoms that resisted English rule. The English conquest of Wales succeeded in 1282 under Edward I, and the Statute of Rhuddlan established English rule 2 years later. To appease the Welsh, Edward's son (later Edward II), who had been born in Wales, was made Prince of Wales in 1301. The tradition of bestowing this title on the eldest son of the British Monarch continues today. An act of 1536 completed the political and administrative union of England and Wales. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While maintaining separate parliaments, England and Scotland were ruled by the same king beginning in 1603, when James VI of Scotland succeeded his cousin Elizabeth I as James I of England. In the ensuing 100 years, strong religious and political differences divided the kingdoms. Finally, in 1707, England and Scotland were unified as Great Britain, sharing a single Parliament at Westminster. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ireland's invasion by the Anglo-Normans in 1170 led to centuries of strife. Successive English kings sought to conquer Ireland. In the early 17th century, large-scale settlement of the north from Scotland and England began. After its defeat, Ireland was subjected, with varying degrees of success, to control and regulation by Britain. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The legislative union of Great Britain and Ireland was completed on January 1, 1801, under the name of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (normally shortened to &amp;quot;Great Britain&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Britain&amp;quot;).  However, armed struggle for independence continued sporadically into the 20th century. The Anglo-Irish Treaty of 1921 established the Irish Free State, which subsequently left the Commonwealth and became a republic after World War II. Six northern, predominantly [[Protestant]], Irish counties have remained part of the United Kingdom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====British Expansion and Empire====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Sir Francis Grant's Portrait of Queen Victoria.jpg|right|200px|thumb|''Queen Victoria'', by [[Sir Francis Grant]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''British Empire''' was the [[List of largest empires|largest empire]] in history and, for over a century, was the foremost [[Great power|global power]]. It was a product of the [[Age of Discovery]], which began with the maritime explorations of the 15th century, that sparked the era of the European [[Colonialism|colonial]] empires.  By 1921, the British Empire held sway over a population of about 458 million people, approximately one-quarter of the world's population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Angus Maddison. ''The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective'' (p. 98, 242). [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development|OECD]], Paris, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It covered about 36.7 million km² (14.2 million square miles),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bruce R. Gordon. [http://www.hostkingdom.net/earthrul.html ''To Rule the Earth...''] (See [http://www.hostkingdom.net/Bibliography.html Bibliography] for sources used.)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; about a quarter of Earth's total land area. As a result, its political, linguistic and cultural legacy is widespread. At the peak of its power, it was often said that &amp;quot;[[The empire on which the sun never sets|the sun never sets on the British Empire]]&amp;quot; because its span across the globe ensured that the sun was always shining on at least one of its numerous [[colonies]] or subject nations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This phrase had already been used a few centuries before by the king [[Charles I of Spain]], referring to the [[Spanish Empire]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Begun initially to support William the Conqueror's (c. 1029-1087) holdings in France, Britain's policy of active involvement in continental European affairs endured for several hundred years. By the end of the 14th century, foreign trade, originally based on wool exports to Europe, had emerged as a cornerstone of national policy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the five decades following [[World War II]], most of the territories of the Empire became independent. Many went on to join the [[Commonwealth of Nations]], a free association of independent states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;T. O. Lloyd, ''The British Empire, 1558-1995. 2nd ed. (1996).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some have retained the [[British monarch]] as their [[head of state]] to become independent [[Commonwealth realm]]s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Sea Power====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The foundations of sea power were gradually laid to protect English trade and open up new routes. Defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 firmly established England as a major sea power. Thereafter, its interests outside Europe grew steadily. Attracted by the spice trade, English mercantile interests spread first to the Far East. In search of an alternate route to the Spice Islands, John Cabot reached the North American continent in 1498. Sir Walter Raleigh organized the first, short-lived colony in Virginia in 1584, and permanent English settlement began in 1607 at Jamestown, Virginia. During the next two centuries, Britain extended its influence abroad and consolidated its political development at home, as the Royal Navy dominated the seas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Industrial Revolution====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bradford Industrial Museum.jpg|thumb|left|Bradford Industrial Museum.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Britain's [[industrial revolution]] greatly strengthened its ability to oppose Napoleonic France. By the end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815, Britain was the foremost European power, and its navy ruled the seas. Peace in Europe allowed the British to focus their interests on more remote parts of the world, and, during this period, the British Empire reached its zenith. British colonial expansion reached its height largely during the reign of [[Queen Victoria]] (1837-1901). [[Victorian era|Queen Victoria's]] reign witnessed the spread of British technology, commerce, language, and government throughout the British Empire, which, at its greatest extent, encompassed roughly one-fifth to one-quarter of the world's area and population. It is controversial whether British colonies accelerated or slowed Britain's economic growth, for its growth rate fell below nations without empires, especially the U.S. and [[Germany]]. Democracy came in fits and starts in a series of reforms that finally, by the 1920s, allowed all adults to vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====End of Empire====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the time of Queen Victoria's death in 1901, other nations, including the United States and Germany, had developed their own industries; Britain lost its comparative economic advantage, and the ambitions of its rivals had grown. The UK joined world war I because of the invasion of [[Belgium]], and subsequently began [[World War II]] after the invasion of [[Poland]]. The losses and destruction of [[World War I|The First World War]], the [[Great Depression]] of the 1930s, the independence of the Dominions, and decades of relatively slow growth eroded the Britain's preeminent international position of the previous century. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nationalism became stronger in other parts of the empire, particularly in India and Egypt. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1926, Britain granted Australia, Canada, and New Zealand almost complete autonomy as &amp;quot;dominions&amp;quot;; beginning with the independence of India and Pakistan in 1947, the remainder of the British Empire was almost completely dismantled by the 1960s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[English Painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[British politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[June 2007 UK terror attacks]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of political parties in the United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mystery:Why is England More Liberal than the United States?]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Flags of the United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Piers Morgan]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Victorian era]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/15/sir-john-chilcot-wrong-man Sir John Chilcot 'wrong man to head Iraq invasion inquiry'.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/iraqi-oil-supply-was-considered-to-be-vital-to-british-interests-2270072.html Iraqi oil supply was considered to be 'vital' to British interests.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{European Union}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United Kingdom|United Kingdom]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:European Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:NATO Members]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Christian-Majority Countries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British Empire]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Welfare State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gun Control]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nuclear Target Structures]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drubg</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Worst_Liberal_Movies&amp;diff=1354206</id>
		<title>Essay:Worst Liberal Movies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Worst_Liberal_Movies&amp;diff=1354206"/>
		<updated>2017-06-15T23:28:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drubg: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;!--If anyone is going to add ''Frozen'' to this list, do NOT claim as one of the reasons as it promoting the homosexual agenda. John Nolte already confirmed on Breitbart that it does not promote the homosexual agenda in any way.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
While many [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies|great conservative movies]] are produced every year, [[Hollywood values|Hollywood]] continues to create many movies which promote, normalize and aggrandize bad behavior and poor values. Below is a list of some of the more egregious examples:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The 5th Wave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The military is portrayed by evil aliens. The film, overall, was a failed franchise that couldn't get on the recent Young Adult book-to-film bandwagon.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34,912,982&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Alien'' Franchise&lt;br /&gt;
|1979-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-feminist anti-capitalist film franchise. The first film was proven to be a rip-off of the 1965 film ''Planet of the Vampires'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzToy-Tjz5g&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but since it fitted the left's agenda, they didn't care and gave it biased reviews anyway. The second film, ''Aliens'', was an anti-Vietnam statement&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T543J2L-gXU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and just like it's predecessor, was also a rip-off of the 1954 film ''Them!''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVoX-C9J4Zk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$515,930,723 (all together)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''All the Way''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|TV-14&lt;br /&gt;
|The 2016 HBO film based on the presidency of [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] is a good example of a historical revisionist film, palatable for Liberals' regressive dominion of the media. Liberals seized the opportunity with the film to distort history in order to hold Pres. Johnson in high regard and also ignored many of the President's faults, including the War on Poverty and how it created a welfare state which destroyed untold numbers of African American families.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''American Psycho''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't be fooled by the false patriotic title, it's the most [[Anti-American]] film you'll ever see. It's also considered a &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot;, just the fact that anyone who thinks a plot about stockbroker who's secretly a serial killer is funny is just disgusting.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,070,285&lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Ant Bully''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes Communism, as the film's main message of the power of the individual to be more powerful than one another is a bad thing. Also, the exterminator is clearly being shown in negative light for simply doing his job, as he is the main villain of the film and it promotes environmentalism as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$28,142,535&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Assault on Wall Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Uwe Boll (often referred to as the worst director of this generation)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Uwe-Boll-considered-one-of-the-worst-film-directors-in-history&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BvLQb2uwW4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; makes a completely inaccurate film that blames capitalism for the [[Recession of 2008|Great Recession]] and the downfall of the everyday man's life. After that the film plays out like an angry middle school boy's fan fiction revenge story. In which all the bankers are summary executionized ([[Russian Revolution|now where have we seen that before in history]]). Boll has also said how we need to f-ing kill the rich, which only shows how uneducated he is.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQJwEAqzFs4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Astro Boy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Based loosely on the 1952 anime, liberal producers and writers twisted the cartoon to fit their [[communist]] agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4Jqlxd7ufM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This however backfired and the film flopped.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cartoonbrew.com/feature-film/astro-boys-abysmal-opening-and-imagis-sinking-ship-17586.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
|$19,551,067&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Apocalypse Now''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Overindulgent anti-war diatribe. Portrays U.S. servicemen as corrupt, incompetent [[drug addiction|drug-users]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$78,784,010&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Birth of a Nation''&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|Extremely racist film that portrays the [[Ku Klux Klan]] as &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot; (the KKK was founded by the Democrat Party, even though the Left has repeatedly tried denying the connection between the two). The film was also particularly notorious for being the first ever film to be shown at the White House under Democrat President [[Woodrow Wilson]], as well as significantly influencing his already-racist core to segregate the White House and various departments.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blue State''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Encourages the false idea that [[liberalism]] must be established in America.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bob Roberts''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-conservative propaganda released during the 1992 election, similar to ''The Candidate'', this was also made by another Hollywood leftist (this time Tim Robbins) and is also another film claiming to be a &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot;, but only demonizes conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,479,470&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Born on the Fourth of July''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Radically anti-[[Vietnam War]] biographical film produced and directed by Communist sympathizer Oliver Stone, starring Tom Cruise as paralyzed Vietnam War vet-turned-anti-Vietnam War leftist protester and Commie sympathizer [[Ron Kovic]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,001,698&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Candidate''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Film that's actually pro-[[George McGovern]] propaganda, while claiming to be a &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot;. It was released during the 1972 election year only to demonized [[Richard Nixon]] and his conservative colleagues. Conservative star [[James Stewart]] also refused to star in it for that reason.&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Capitalism: A Love Story]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A typical Michael Moore hatchet-job where he relentlessly attacks America's [[capitalist]] [[economy]] with claims of alleged financial inequality.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,363,397&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cars 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Demonizes oil companies while promoting ethanol (mentioned as Allinall). On the film's political agenda, director John Lasseter commented: &amp;quot;Why isn't alternative fuel more... Why isn't everybody jumping on that bandwagon? It makes so much sense: Electricity, solar, whatever. There's ethanol. There's all this stuff you could be doing. And so I thought, well, that could be really cool in that you could have big oil versus alternative fuel. That's when we kind of crafted the bad guy's story.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$191,450,875&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Casualties of War''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
| Another anti-Vietnam war statement film with Sean Penn that features a plot involving American soldiers gang raping a Vietnamese woman, paints America soldiers as the bad guys while failing to acknowledge how the Viet Cong, Khmer Rouge or other communist Insurgents did the same thing to a far larger scale.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,671,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Che''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008; 2009&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
| As implied by the name, the film is a two-part biopic for the Argentine Marxist terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]], and as usual, the film treats him in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|US$40.9 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The China Syndrome''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie depicts a meltdown of a fictional [[nuclear power]] plant. The film greatly over-hypes this risk of a [[nuclear accident]]/meltdown and the resultant damage. This film along with the [[Three Mile Island]] incident (which occurred shortly after the film's release) are often credited for killing the nuclear power industry in America.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,718,367&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Contender''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Political movie turned into pro-[[Al Gore]] propaganda by liberal studio executives and [[Hollywood values]]. Conservative star Gary Oldman also told IGN that the film was to suppose to be apolitical, but was edited to make Republicans look like the bad guys.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ign.com/articles/2001/02/26/interview-with-gary-oldman&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
|$17,872,723&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Das Boot''&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The German Side of [[World War II]], shown in a positive view, and is Anti-American.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,487,676&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Day of the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal scientist whom plan to tame zombies are the good guys, while the common sense conservative soldiers (who's plan is to euthanize them all) are the bad guys. &lt;br /&gt;
|$5,000,000 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-   &lt;br /&gt;
|''Dawn of the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-capitalism film that portrays consumers as zombies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9487PyyblpQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The 2004 Zack Snyder-directed remake abandoned this. &lt;br /&gt;
|$55 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dead Man Walking'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A senseless criticism of [[capital punishment]], with an ending that left some liberal viewers even more confused.&lt;br /&gt;
|$39,363,635&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dogville'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An [[Anti-American]] propaganda film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,680,836&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fahrenheit 9/11'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A [[Michael Moore]] movie, which distorts the tangential link between the [[Bush]] family and the [[Bin Laden]] family.&lt;br /&gt;
|$119,194,771&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fair Game''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another Bush bash flick starring [[Communist]] Sean Penn. 2010 film rehashes the lead up to the [[Iraq War|war in Iraq]] and [[Valerie Plame]]'s role. Typical un-American Hollywood film &amp;quot;The narrative that [[Karl Rove]] and [[Dick Cheney]]'s Chief of Staff [[Scooter Libby]] were nefarious behind-the-scenes players intent on destroying innocent reputations while pushing the nation into war on false pretenses.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$9,540,691&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fire Down Below''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An environmentalism film with Steven Seagal playing a Gary Stu like role.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,228,448&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Food Fight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-capitalist computer animated film that demonizes leading companies.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Frost/Nixon]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A liberal movie meant to further tarnish the reputation of [[Richard Nixon]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,622,031&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Game Change''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberal]] haters playing [[conservative]]s in an [[HBO]] movie about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain|McCain]] and Palin denounced the film and called it fiction.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''God Bless America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A rip-off of the conservative film Falling Down, this &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; has a miserable man and his foul-mouthed [[nihilist]] girl sidekick summary executes [[Tea Party]] members, a Fox News like-host, Christians, and other conservative stereotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$123,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Independence Day: Resurgence''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite being the sequel to the patriotic and to a certain extent Conservative film ''Independence Day'', the film, despite the title, does not actually promote the concepts of patriotism, American exceptionalism, or even mention national sovereignty at all. Instead, most of the movie seems to promote globalist-style government, and also has Doctor Okun being revealed to be a homosexual despite such never being implied in the original film. Also has some forced multicultural elements as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$389.7 million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Iron Giant''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Espouses anti-war themes and also brief but strong anti-hunting sentiments. Firearms in general are shown in a negative light, with the phrase &amp;quot;guns kill&amp;quot; being repeated a total of three times. The titular giant is referred to as a &amp;quot;big gun that walks.&amp;quot; From a conservative viewpoint, he is a poor metaphor for a real gun; unlike a law-abiding citizen who is a gun owner, the giant has no choice in his actions because he is a war machine programmed with the inability to use his weapons for good, but only to use them thoughtlessly and senselessly. The story involves him learning to hide his weapons and &amp;quot;not be a gun&amp;quot;. The conclusion is that, in order to protect the public from an incoming missile, he must fly into it and kill himself rather than use his guns against it. As it is explained, &amp;quot;It's bad to kill, but it isn't bad to die.&amp;quot; In addition, despite being set during the Cold War, it largely downplays the Soviet menace that was occurring during that time, as the main antagonist, Kent Mansley, is a government agent (implied to be part of the NSA) investigating the titular Iron Giant who at one point while launching a tirade against Hogarth Hughes alludes to the possibility that the Communists may have been responsible for the Giant's creation as a means to destroy America and that they must destroy it before &amp;quot;it destroys us&amp;quot; and is treated negatively for it. Also features some foul language.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,732,614&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''JFK''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A bastardized historical inaccurate account on John F. Kennedy's assassination, in order to serve liberal filmmaker Oliver Stone's insanely fanatic conspiracy theories. For example, the filmmaker pinpoints the blame to the &amp;quot;real murder&amp;quot; of Pres. Kennedy: the conservative politicians, the U.S. Military, and then-Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson, all of whom want America to go to war in Vietnam, because Kennedy rejected the American involvement. Stone described the film as a &amp;quot;counter-myth&amp;quot; to the Warren Commission's &amp;quot;fictional myth.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,405,498&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Legend of the Titanic''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|An animated film that bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making an anti-whaling statement.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lone Ranger''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Attacks [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]], portraying the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as 'thugs' who support their actions. Also distorts the messages of its source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV show and radio show, as dumb-founded and unintelligent, instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot]]-smoker [[Johnny Depp]]) as not only the &amp;quot;star&amp;quot; of the film, but as the Lone Ranger's &amp;quot;voice of reason&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$89,302,115&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Magnificent Seven'' (2016 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|This remake suits the left agenda, as capitalists are the villains in this remake.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://missliberty.com/magnificent-seven-remake-is-angry-radical-fantasy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$93,145,387&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Manderlay'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-American sequel to ''Dogville''.  Star [[James Caan]] refused to be a part of this, describing director Lars von Trier as Anti-American and stated that he himself is an &amp;quot;ultra-conservative&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$674,918&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Matrix'' trilogy&lt;br /&gt;
|1999 (''[[The Matrix]]''); 2003 (''The Matrix Reloaded'' and ''The Matrix Revolutions'')&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies anarchism and [[nihilism]] (even including a brief nod to [[Jean Baudrillard]]'s &amp;quot;On Nihilism&amp;quot; chapter from Simulacra and Simulation), as well as containing several hints towards a pro-Communist, anti-American/[[anti-Christian]] view, despite the salvation narrative. In addition, the Architect scene tries to give a &amp;quot;devastating critique/twist&amp;quot; to salvation myths with the Architect as a malevolent allegorical substitute for the Christian [[God]]. This same scene also implicitly compares [[George W. Bush]] to Hitler during a discussion of evil in the world (on the panel of screens in the background.), and featured wars that America was specifically involved in. Far-[[leftist|Left]] [[race-baiting]] scholar Cornel West was also hired to play a role in the film specifically because the [[The Wachowskis|Wachowski Brothers]] (as they were known at the time) were influenced by his pro-Socialist/Communist and anti-American rhetoric. In addition, the first film had throwaway dialogue between the main villain Agent Smith and the treasonous freedom fighter Cipher that implied that Cipher would become [[Ronald Reagan]] should he succeed in betraying his fellow allies to the Agents in a clear attempt at an anti-Reagan statement.&lt;br /&gt;
| $592,370,339 (all together) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Midnight in Paris''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The main character, a liberal author, is portrayed as open-minded and intellectual. He has an unsuccessful relationship with a woman whose family is Republican and are portrayed as materialistic, selfish, narrow-minded and hateful towards any country that is not the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,816,662 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Milk'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008 &lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An extremely pro-[[homosexual]] biography of openly homosexual politician [[Harvey Milk]], with [[Sean Penn]] playing the title character.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,841,299&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Motorcycle Diaries'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A fawning monument to [[Communist]] terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,781,387&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Muppets''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Although liberal, Muppet creator Jim Henson would stay out of a political agendas and focus on good family friendly fun; this sadly changed when Disney took control and used it to disseminate their twisted political beliefs. In this film, the rich (capitalists) are bad, and the poor are good. The bad guy is also an oil magnate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4Jqlxd7ufM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although a &amp;quot;success&amp;quot; the film failed to break even domestically in the U.S., while almost half of their box office gross came from overseas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=themuppets.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Pretty much showing, that Americans didn't want to see their propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
|$88,631,237 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|15&lt;br /&gt;
|A &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; which pushes environmentalism and demonizes productive businesses and especially the oil industry.&lt;br /&gt;
|$86,930,411&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Nixon'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A historically inaccurate biography of [[Richard Nixon]] directed by liberal filmmaker [[Oliver Stone]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,681,765&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''On Deadly Ground''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Oil industry is seen as greedy and unsympathetic while praising the [[EPA]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,590,458&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Pokémon: Zoroark - Master of Illusions''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010 (Japan); 2011 (America)&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The anime film demonizes capitalism by making the main villain a successful businessman. In addition, one of the main protagonists of the film, Karl, was based on the radical left-wing schlockumentarist Michael Moore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gamefreak.co.jp/blog/art/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Recount''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|The 2008 [[HBO]] movie on the [[United States presidential election, 2000|2000 Presidential election]] and its aftermath in [[Florida]], presented from a [[Liberal bias|liberal-biased]] viewpoint. A look into how [[Democrats]] and their [[Mainstream media|liberal media]] supporters claim the [[Republicans]] &amp;quot;stole&amp;quot; the [[election]] and the alleged role of its party members that the Democrats claim &amp;quot;made it happen&amp;quot; (although in reality, it was the Democrats themselves who tried to steal the election for their candidate [[Al Gore]] [[United States presidential election, 2000#Recount|by attempting to commit vote fraud in Florida through ordering selective recounts in Democrat-friendly areas while ignoring Republican-strong areas]], only to be stopped when the US Supreme Court ruled the Democrats' end-run attempt around election rules to be illegal). Republicans are portrayed as ghoulish and cited as manufacturing demonstrations. Both the real [[Warren Christopher]] and [[James Baker]] contend the film's portrayal of the former is hopelessly untrue.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Redacted''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Brian De Palma’s 2007 fictional anti-Iraq War film funded by Mark Cuban. The film is credited with inspiring a [[terrorist]] attack that killed two U.S. servicemen in [[Germany]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$65,388&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Reds''&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|As a biographical film on the life of notorious American [[Communist]] journalist John Reed, ''Reds'' is a sentimental and overly romanticized portrait of [[communism]], [[humanism]], and [[anarchism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,382,659&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Return of the Living Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Suggests military is responsible for the release of a toxin that turns people into zombies. The military is also shown to be inconstant, as they &amp;quot;fix&amp;quot; this by nuking the city of zombies. An anti-[[Ronald Reagan|Reagan]] statement some may say. &lt;br /&gt;
|$14,237,880 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shoot 'Em Up''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An anti-second amendment film, the so-called hero is a nihilist and the villains are trying to defend guns rights and the Second Amendment.&lt;br /&gt;
|$12,807,139&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Short Circuit''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should've been rated PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|On top of just being an blatant ''E.T.'' rip-off, ''Short Circuit'' also downgrades the military (or the Reagan Administration in general).&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,697,761&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''[[SiCKO]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another Michael Moore film which spread many falsehoods about American [[healthcare]] while unduly glorifying the so-called benefits of [[socialized medicine]] such as now found in [[Obamacare]]. Memorably referred to [[Cuba]]n healthcare as being better than American healthcare. &lt;br /&gt;
|$24,540,079&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Siege''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't be fooled by the fact that Bruce Willis is in it. Willis plays the antagonist, an Army general who institutes martial law in New York City after a wave of terrorist attacks. Portrays Muslims as the victims while demonizing the military.&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,932,372&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek: Into Darkness''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Aside from it being a blatant ripoff on ''Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan'' in terms of plotline, the film also has several anti-War on Terror messages, as indicated by both Benedict Cumberbatch and Simon Pegg.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/2/22/4-ways-star-trek-into-darkness-shills-for-surrender-in-the-war-on-terror/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$467.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''They Live''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Capitalists are portrayed as evil aliens planning to rule the world. The director John Carpenter also claimed in interviews that the film was anti-[[Ronald Reagan]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/john-carpenter-they-live-was-about-giving-the-finger-to-reagan/#/0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,008,928 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Thomas Crown Affair''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Supports the idea that capitalism causes crime.&lt;br /&gt;
| $14 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tout va Bien'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1972 &lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Jane Fonda]] &amp;quot;art film&amp;quot; directed by [[Jean-Luc Godard]], whose notoriously anti-American and idolizes [[Karl Marx]], is nothing more than a propaganda film for Communism, as it sympathizes with the youths who partook in the May 1968 Communist uprisings in [[France]] and features blunt anti-American imagery.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Triumph of the Will''&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|Infamous Nazi propaganda film (even though the left denies it, the truth was the Nazis were left wing national socialists)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Trumbo''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Dalton Trumbo, one of the Hollywood Ten who was jailed for his Communist beliefs, is portrayed as a free-speech martyr, and a champion of the First Amendment. All of his controversial beliefs are whitewashed, including his support of Lenin, Hitler (until the Nazi-Soviet Pact fell), Kim Il-Sung, and, of course, Stalin. Conversely, anti-Communists such as John Wayne, Hedda Hopper, Robert Taylor, Roy Brewer, the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC), and the Motion Picture Alliance for the Preservation of American Ideals (MPA) are falsely portrayed as &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;oppressive&amp;quot;, and anti-free-speech.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,857,741	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Truth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Highly fictionalized political docudrama about the Killian documents controversy meant to further tarnish the reputation of [[George W. Bush]]. The film was not approved by current CBS President and CEO Leslie Moonves and CBS refused to air advertisements for the film due to its, as the network stated, &amp;quot;inaccuracies and distortions&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,541,854&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''V for Vendetta'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly glorifies [[anarchism]], [[socialism]], [[communism]] and [[homosexuality]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,511,035&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[W.]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie designed to denigrate the role of [[Christianity]] in U.S. [[politics]] and particularly in the life of [[George W. Bush]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,534,493&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''White House Down''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Mocks conservatives with a liberal plot twist that makes the [[TEA Party]] out to be &amp;quot;terrorists&amp;quot;. This movie was made by uber-liberals to counter conservative film; ''Olympus Has Fallen'', which depicts North Korean terrorists as the bad guys.&lt;br /&gt;
|$73,103,784&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Z'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal propaganda that blames the [[military]] for liberal wrongdoing.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,283,305&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Social==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Romanian film baselessly supports [[abortion]].  Liberals praised it when it won the Palme d'Or at the Cannes Film Festival.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,198,208&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''American Pie''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|First installment of a long-running film franchise primarily dealing with teenage sex and alcohol. It relies on jokes about sex and bodily functions. Film also treats date rape as &amp;quot;funny&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$102,561,004&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Animal House''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A college &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; that glorifies [[alcohol abuse]], debauchery, [[nihilism]], extramarital sex, and all varieties of youthful rebellion. The dean, played by John Vernon, suggests that being &amp;quot;Fat, drunk and stupid, son, is no way to go through life&amp;quot; to one of the rebellious youth representing the rowdy Delta Tau Chi fraternity, but he's depicted as the villain because of that. After the Delta boys are finally punished by being collectively expelled from college, they exact their revenge by sabotaging a homecoming parade and do not face punishment for such a great misdeed. Even so, the film's &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot;, portrayed by one of Hollywood's most amoral actors ever, John Belushi, goes on to become a U.S. Senator, which is passed off as humorous.&lt;br /&gt;
|$141,600,000 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Atlantis: The Lost Empire''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Another film released during the [[Michael Eisner]] era of [[Disney]]. The film has a Military Commander as the bad guy who would endanger the city of Atlantis just to be rich, with it also being implied that he was going to commit treason by selling the power source to the Kaiser during World War I for the same motivation. Simply having an adventure movie in Atlantis is just too much to ask I guess.&lt;br /&gt;
|$84,056,472&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Avatar (film)|Avatar]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie with many destructive messages. The movie promotes [[environmentalism]] and [[feminism]] and claims that nature is God. It also ridicules the military and large businesses. The hero of the film also forms a rather creepy romance with the native princess, who is of another species, perhaps a symbol for bestiality. The overall plotline has hints of endorsing environmental terrorism, which James Cameron indicated that he himself supported.&lt;br /&gt;
|$760,507,625&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Santa''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Lots of coarse language, sexual escapades, drunkenness, and also the main plot involved a con man posing as a Mall Santa so he and his dwarf accomplice can rob the mall's safe. It was bad enough that critics panned Disney for allowing the trashing of a cultural icon like Santa Claus as well as even then-Disney CEO, Michael Eisner, to be disgusted with the resulting film, acting as one of the main reasons for Miramax being cut loose from Disney alongside ''Kill Bill''.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Santa 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A sequel to the already revolting ''Bad Santa''.&lt;br /&gt;
|$23.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bad Teacher''&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An awful high school teacher, who is always getting high and drunk, tries to get breast-implant surgery, and encourages cheating and stealing from her students. The movie contains no [[morals]] and is filled with offensive sexual content.&lt;br /&gt;
| $100,292,856&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Barnyard: The Original Party Animals''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Set on a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of real humans, it promotes disorderly conduct, portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid, and completely demonizes coyotes for being meat eating animals. A ferret character also converts to [[vegetarianism]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and gambling. On top of that, the movie is widely considered to have stolen much of its plot from the more conservative animation ''The Lion King''.&lt;br /&gt;
|$116,500,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battle for Terra'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Children’s animated film that pushes an environmentalist theme and portrays a Bible-quoting, American type military general as the main antagonist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,647,083&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beginners''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes homosexuality and &amp;quot;[[coming out of the closet]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,790,894&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Being John Malkovich''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes homosexuality and includes a large amount of extremely vulgar humor.&lt;br /&gt;
|$637,721 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ben &amp;amp; Arthur''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|As the title suggests, this is a pro-homosexual propaganda movie which also portrays Christians as &amp;quot;hateful bigots&amp;quot;. The film has the reputation of being one of the most hated homosexual movies by critics and audiences alike, even among homosexuals. Wikipedia also acknowledges this, as this movie is on the page &amp;quot;List of movies considered the worst&amp;quot;. Was a major box-office bomb.&lt;br /&gt;
|$40,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Big Lebowski''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies [[drug abuse]], laziness, and [[nihilism]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$17,451,873&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Billy Elliot''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|British film about a boy who wants to be a ballet dancer rather than play sports. The film features very poor family values as the family is constantly cursing at one another; promotes homosexuality, as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21,995,263&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bio-Dome'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Stoner film with an environmentalism theme.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,427,615&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Birdcage''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Yet another pro-[[homosexual agenda]] and conservative bashing film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$124,060,553&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blow''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the life of drug dealer, and suspected murderer, George Jung.&lt;br /&gt;
|$52,990,775&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blue is the Warmest Color'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|French film that promotes the [[homosexual agenda]] and graphically shows lesbian sex.  Additionally, it falsely idealizes the idea that homosexuals can be sound mentors to young children.  At the Cannes Film Festival, which was headed by liberal [[Steven Spielberg]] and had a board that included ''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' director, Ang Lee, it was unanimously awarded the top prize.  It is widely believed that this victory was due to France's legalization of [[same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]] eight days prior. At least one of the stars of the film admitted that she felt disgusted by her role in it.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,199,787&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boogie Nights'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the porn industry and the exploitation of women.&lt;br /&gt;
|$26,400,640&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boyhood''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Centered on a family raised by a single mother, it downplays the importance a father has on a child's growth and development, mocks conservative Christians, and promotes underage drinking and pot smoking.&lt;br /&gt;
|$44,400,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Boys Don't Cry''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It gorifies the choice of a young girl to embrace homosexual and transgender life choices, dishonesty, and pre-marital relations. Furthermore, it caricatures and exaggerates natural reactions to her perversion, all in aid of promoting the [[homosexual agenda]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,533,945&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Brave''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure. This unabashedly promotes feminism and demonstrates poor family values throughout. Of course, the men in the film are doofuses compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup despite the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film and her being created by Pixar, not by Disney directly.&lt;br /&gt;
|$540.4 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Breakfast Club]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes use of drugs, smoking, and extramarital sex.&lt;br /&gt;
|$51,525,171&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Brokeback Mountain]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The film shows that [[liberals]] will [[shoehorning|shoehorn]] the homosexual agenda into anything, even Westerns.&lt;br /&gt;
|$83,043,761&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Brothers Grimsby''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Extremely vulgar movie, contains many sex jokes, sex scenes, nudity, and even contains an elephant sex scene. Also has a joke of Donald Trump getting AIDS.&lt;br /&gt;
|$6,874,837&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''But I'm a Cheerleader'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Features a lesbian [[public school]] [[cheerleading|cheerleader]] who is attracted to other cheerleaders, portraying [[homosexuality]] as a legitimate lifestyle, attacks and ridicules [[reparative therapy]] and religious people. Normalizes lesbians by depicting the star as a girly cheerleader, something lesbians usually are not.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,205,627&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Caligula''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|UR (should be NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|Historical drama centered around the infamous Roman emperor of the same name, this has been considered the most pornographic movie ever made. Contains unsimulated scenes of oral/anal sex, incest and close-ups of the genitalia of both sexes, along with brutal violence. Also considered one of the worst movies ever made. Upon release, several U.S. cities tried to prevent the movie from being played, though courts repeatedly affirmed that it passed the Miller test (that it was not too obscene to be banned). Some lawyers defending the movie even lamented that this movie helped to form a conservative morality that helped Ronald Reagan win the 1980 election.&lt;br /&gt;
|$23 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Cat in the Hat''&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|A bastardization of a harmless children's classic filled with adult humor and pandered to focus groups. It is the reason why Dr. Seuss's family estate has banned any live action adaptations of Seuss's works. It won a one-time Golden Raspberry Award for &amp;quot;Worst Excuse for an Actual Movie (All Concept/No Content)&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$134 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Cider House Rules''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies [[abortion]] and advocates [[pro-choice]] values to a fault.&lt;br /&gt;
|$57,545,092&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chappie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Another &amp;quot;social&amp;quot; science fiction film that just abuses our [[First Amendment|first amendment right]] to bash capitalism. Neill Blomkamp also directed liberal films District 9 and Elysium too. On an optimistic note, the film got bad reviews (even from liberal critics)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/chappie/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the film did poorly in America (70% of its gross came from overseas).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=chappie.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,569,268 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Clerks]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Filled with constant vulgar [[profanity]]. Previously rated NC-17 before being appealed for an R rating.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,151,130&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Clerks 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sequel to the liberal comedy, filled with more profanity and even more disgusting acts that could not be in the budget of the original film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,148,068&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Cosmic Slop]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|HBO trilogy focusing on minority science fiction. The main claim to fame was an adaptation of ''[[The Space Traders]]'', a race-baiting short story that was written by the infamous race-baiting leftist professor Derrick Bell.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dallas Buyers Club''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Egregiously supports the homosexual agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,298,285&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Danish Girl''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|One of the definitive pro-homosexual/gender confusion propaganda films. Eddie Redmayne portrays Einar Wegener, a landscape artist who stands in for a female model who no-showed for a planned painting made by Wegener's wife, Gerda. Einar, who has undergone gender confusion for years, snaps as a result of the modeling sessions where he stands in as &amp;quot;female&amp;quot; and he begins claiming to be a &amp;quot;woman&amp;quot; calling himself &amp;quot;Lili Elbe&amp;quot;, which nearly leads to him being committed to an asylum. Einar later undergoes surgical mutilation to accommodate his delusion, but he dies of infection due to the mutilation.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Day After''&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Attacks the military and conservative politicians, and encourages negotiation with Communists.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA - TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Day After Tomorrow'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Overdramatic, nonsensical portrayal of the consequences of fictional &amp;quot;[[climate change]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$186,740,799&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Day of the Animals''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|PG &lt;br /&gt;
|Environmentalist propaganda that states &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; turns woodland animals into psychotic human-hunters. It also claims that humans must get what they deserve (which they do not).&lt;br /&gt;
|$2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Dazed and Confused''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes [[promiscuity]] and [[drug abuse]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,993,039&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''District 9''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Attacks the military and large corporation, shows humans as the villains to aliens.&lt;br /&gt;
|$115,646,235 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Don’t Breathe''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The movies protagonist are three burglars who break into homes (secured  by one of their father’s security company) to steal items to sell. The “Villain” of the movie is blind army veteran, and the homeowner of the house they are breaking into.  Though they do find he has kidnapped the girl who killed his daughter in a car accident. Also the leader of the thieves is a girl, is clearly a sign of feminism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$89,217,875&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Doom''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the video game that influenced [[Columbine High School massacre|Columbine]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20060223025846/columbine.free2host.net/quotes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; All the military characters (except one) are either dirt bags or corrupt. On top of that, there's hardly any monster action.&lt;br /&gt;
|$28,212,337&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Drag Me to Hell''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite being made by known Republican&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://whatculture.com/offbeat/10-celebs-you-wouldnt-expect-to-be-republicans?page=4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sam Raimi, the film's premise dealt with a woman being condemned simply for doing what her job required her to do at the bank, with Raimi also implicitly stating that the gypsy who cursed her had sympathetic reasons for cursing the main protagonist despite the fact that she herself had explicitly foresaked paying mortgage three times. In addition, the means to counteract the Lamia (the creature responsible for sending people to Hell when cursed) were more explicitly Pagan than Christian.&lt;br /&gt;
|$90.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Easy Rider''&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies every aspect of the hippie lifestyle, and is also Anti-American. Portrays conservatives as &amp;quot;bigoted&amp;quot; rednecks.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Elysium''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Criticizes Big Business and supports [[illegal immigration]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$93,050,117&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fantastic Four''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based very loosely on the comics of the same name. The military is once again portrayed in a negative manner, here they only want to use superpowered teens as weapons. On top of that, they also changed the race of the Human Torch for political correctness/cultural Marxism reasons. The film was also infamous for its controversial behind-the-scenes history. The studio executives mandated reshoots without the director's knowledge of this and the final cut was gutted in the editing room. Director Josh Trank was so angered by this that he completely disowned the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.joblo.com/movie-news/josh-trank-disowns-fantastic-four-via-twitter-claims-studio-interference-322&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,117,548 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Fast Food Nation''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite its title and that fact that Bruce Willis is in it, the film is completely Anti-Fast Food, anti-capitalism, and even promoting the environmental agenda, illegal immigration and sex outside marriage in this vegan propaganda film&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,005,539&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Fast Times at Ridgemont High''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film glorifies [[drug abuse]], premarital sex, and [[abortion]]. It was also one of [[Sean Penn]]'s early film roles as he would go on to star in more liberal propaganda films.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,092,880   &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''FernGully: The Last Rainforest''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmental [[propaganda]], with an anti-industry message, is being indoctrinated to children in the animation film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,650,296&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Forest''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the Aokigahara Forest in Japan as a scary place filled with vengeful ghosts. In reality, it is a sad place where people go to commit suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Fourth Kind''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Uses the real life tragedies of deceased and missing citizens of Nome, Alaska to make money with a fictitious story about alien abductions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47,709,193&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Freddy Got Fingered''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains a lot of crude and revolting gross-out sexual humor, including a scene where the main character actually makes a horse [censored]. Uses shock tactics in much the same way that ''[[Family Guy]]'' does. Won five Razzie awards, including Worst Picture and four awards (Worst Actor, Worst Director, Worst Screenplay and Worst Screen Couple) for star and director, Canadian &amp;quot;comedian&amp;quot; Tom Green.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Free Birds''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|This animated film's main premise is about taking turkey off of the Thanksgiving menu.&lt;br /&gt;
|$55,750,480&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ghostbusters'' (2016 remake)&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A complete bastardization of the 1984 classic conservative film. This film is pro-feminism on steroids, as every male character is either dumb or a jerk and also has both racist and sexual innuendo jokes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7ikR-6uSMYz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Luckily, no one (other then biased liberal critics) liked it, as its trailer was known for being the most hated movie trailer on YouTube.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://screencrush.com/ghostbusters-trailer-most-disliked-movie-trailer-in-history/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sony was also caught making fake reviews for the film too.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXv3w59raZ4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And the film flopped at the box office.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/news/ni60138331?fb_comment_id=1146766692061206_1146942958710246&amp;amp;comment_id=1146942958710246&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as well as the fact that Sony Pictures Entertainment would loose over $70 million on the film's financial losses.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,049,002 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Glen or Glenda''&lt;br /&gt;
|1953&lt;br /&gt;
|Not rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Created by Ed Wood, widely regarded as one of the worst directors of all time, it promotes cross-dressing and transsexualism.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Gnomeo and Juliet''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains a joke that could be interpreted as passing off bestiality as funny.&lt;br /&gt;
|$194 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Godzilla'' (1998 film)&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberal and homosexual director Roland Emmerich has turned Godzilla into a girl. The film also mentions how the military does more damage than Godzilla, which could be a little social commentary there. The film even fails to address the original message of the original 1954 Japanese film, as well (the first Godzilla was about the aftermath of the Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki). &lt;br /&gt;
|$136,314,294&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Good Will Hunting]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Left-wing film made by left-wing actors/writers [[Matt Damon]] and [[Ben Affleck]], as well as staring Matt Damon. Also notable as being the main reason why [[Howard Zinn]]'s anti-American textbook ''A People's History to the United States'' became both public knowledge and provided in all universities and high schools across America, due to Matt Damon's character, Will Hunting, telling [[Robin William]]'s character in a pivotal scene &amp;quot;You wanna read a ''real'' history book, read Howard Zinn’s ''People’s History of the United States''. That book’ll f*****’ knock you on your a**.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2013/8/9/the-5-most-destructive-political-ideas-in-matt-damons-movies/5/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$225,933,435 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Groovenians''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts hippies and hipsters as just &amp;quot;misunderstood people&amp;quot; and wealthy businessmen as greedy and power hungry robots.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hair''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the Broadway musical, the film's profanity, its depiction of the use of illegal drugs, its treatment of sexuality, its irreverence for the American flag, and its gratuitous nudity caused much comment and controversy as it did when the stage musical first premiered in 1967. A product of the hippie counterculture and sexual revolution of the 1960s, several of its songs became anthems of the anti-Vietnam War peace movement.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,284,643&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hairspray''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Poor [[moral]]s shown, encourages homosexual agenda, bad behavior, such as smoking, drinking, cursing. Many sexual comments are shown. It portrays conservatives and those with high expectations in a negative viewpoint. &lt;br /&gt;
|$118,871,849&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The adventures of two pot-smokers who play up ethnic stereotypes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,250,550&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Harry and the Hendersons&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|PG (Should be PG-13)&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|$49 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Horrible Bosses''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Three men try to kill their bosses. Two of the three bosses are wealthy businessmen. The film is also filled with offensive language and many sexual references.&lt;br /&gt;
|$117,538,559&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Howl''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Film about homosexual poet and [[beatnik]]-turned-[[hippie]], [[Allen Ginsberg]].  Promotes the [[homosexual agenda]] and the idea that writing about [[pornography]] is &amp;quot;protected&amp;quot; under the [[First Amendment]] and has &amp;quot;literary value&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$617,334&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ice Age: The Meltdown''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A &amp;quot;children's film&amp;quot; that pushes the Left's delusion of &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot; onto its viewers. &lt;br /&gt;
|$195,330,621&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Jackass]]: The Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Essentially a montage of ridiculous stunts and pranks with no coherent story.&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,255,312 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jennifer's Body''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes feminism and glorifies [[Satanism]], contains a lesbian kiss and them making out.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,204,793.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kids'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Pornographic film concerning five underage teenagers in [[New York City]] engaging in graphic sex, violent acts, [[drug]]/[[alcohol]] use, and homosexual activities.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,412,216&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Kids Are All Right'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays homosexuality and homosexual parenting as a &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,811,365&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Laramie Project]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|An adaptation of the play of the same name made by HBO to promote the homosexual agenda, including giving a one-sided, extremely biased perspective on the murder of Matthew Shepherd implying that his murderers had &amp;quot;homophobia&amp;quot; as a motive. It also has a significant anti-religious bent in it, where two of the documentarists (implied to be homosexual) tried to talk to a priest specifically to &amp;quot;piss him off,&amp;quot; and also had one of the members breaking down from a priest being &amp;quot;hateful&amp;quot; simply because he implied the possibility that Matthew Shepherd will go to hell if he didn't repent for his homosexual activities.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Léon: The Professional''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgusting film the features an assassin taking an orphan under his wing (even worse her family shows poor values and are nasty to each other). He then trains her to be an assassin herself to kill the corrupt DEA responsible for her parents murder, but also the assassin who's much older than her seems to be [[Pedophilia|romanticized by her]] (in a deleted scene they even have sex).&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,501,238&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|''Lethal Weapon 3''&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-gun control propaganda disguised as a buddy cop action film. &lt;br /&gt;
|$144,731,527&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lethal Weapon 4''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The sequel now has a pro-illegal immigration message.&lt;br /&gt;
|$130,444,603&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Mad Max: Fury Road''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Feminist propaganda that endorses and celebrates anarchy. Fourth movie in the ''Mad Max'' film series first made famous by Mel Gibson in the title role between 1979 and 1985.&lt;br /&gt;
|$153,636,354&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Maleficent''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Apparently represents the idea of revising the &amp;quot;Sleeping Beauty&amp;quot; story to focus on a lesbian relationship; although Aurora clearly loves Maleficent as a mother figure, Maleficent takes over the role of the prince and is revealed to be the person whose kiss of &amp;quot;true love&amp;quot; (given on the forehead) really saved Aurora. Unabashedly promotes the feminist agenda to the extent that most of the males are either villains or useless, even going so far as to heavily hint at a transgender philosophy; promotes hard-core environmentalism, moral relativism and even Marxism; pretty much ruins the morality tale for ''Sleeping Beauty''. ''The Federalist'' also had a field day with the film stating how it promoted the leftist agenda and citing point by point its agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thefederalist.com/2014/06/06/maleficent-once-upon-a-screed/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In particular, King Stefan, far from being depicted as a good father who gave up Aurora to the three fairies to protect her from the curse, was shown to not care for Aurora at all and was willing to let her die from the curse.&lt;br /&gt;
|$241,410,378&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't be fooled by the fact that Hollywood conservative, Clint Eastwood directed this film or that it both takes place and was filmed in the overall conservative city of Savannah, Georgia. It is based on the equally bad nonfiction novel of the same name, and has LGBT, environmentalist, witchcraft, and anti-capitalist themes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,105,255&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Moonlight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A coming-of-age film that glorifies drug use and [[homosexuality]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,557,396 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=moonlight2016.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Movie 43''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anthology of short &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot; films which glamorize virtually every form of deviant sexuality imaginable. Much of the &amp;quot;humor&amp;quot; is scatological, including a scene with a character who enjoys being pooed upon. Aside from that, ''Movie 43'' is literally one of the worst motion pictures ever made in history, as it has nothing that would make it good, imaginative, funny, charming, or understandable of its existence at all. Won three Razzie awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director (all directors) and Worst Screenplay (all screenwriters).&lt;br /&gt;
|$32.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mulan''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals changing history to suit their feminist agenda similar to what they did in Pocahontas (In the film the Huns are at war with China, even though this never happened).&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,620,254 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mulholland Drive''&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Nonsensical art film that thinks homosexuality is &amp;quot;sexy&amp;quot; and promotes it as a societal norm, as well as fornication.&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,220,243&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''My Own Private Idaho''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Two homosexual street hustlers begin having an affair while seeking adventure en route to Idaho and then Italy. One of the more infamous cinematic examples of the homosexual agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
|$6,401,336	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Natural Born Killers'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Riddled with violence, drug abuse and sexual references, this movie's main characters are brutal serial killers who are viewed as &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot;. Infamously known for influencing Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold for committing the massacre at [[Columbine High School massacre]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-columbine-shooters/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
|$50,282,766&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Nightmare Before Christmas''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Aims to be nothing less than the most iconic and thorough degradation of the sacred holiday in the history of cinema. Originally released under Disney's Touchstone Pictures brand, it has recently been quietly swapped to the Walt Disney Pictures brand in 2006 in order that its poisonous content might reach as many children as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
|$75,082,668&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Norm of the North''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-big-business in the form of a greedy real estate mogul in a possible jab at Donald Trump. Extremely environmentalist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24.8 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Normal Heart''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|TV MA&lt;br /&gt;
|Another [[homosexual agenda|homosexual propaganda]] film that criticizes the [[Reagan Administration]] and general Conservative ideology.  The LGBT community was a strong promoter of this film and insists it is &amp;quot;artful&amp;quot;, when really it is decadent. &lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Nut Job''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes disorderly conduct and non-conformity, and one of the antagonists is a head businessman. It is also pro-environmentalism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$64,251,541&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Nymphomaniac'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|This two-part movie features four hours of non-stop sex and glamorizes the lifestyle of the titular sex addict.  It portrays other [[San Francisco values]], such as homosexuality and S&amp;amp;M, in a positive light. In general, this film was labeled as NSFW. Director, Lars von Trier, is known for being anti-American and slightly hints at this throughout the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$17,584,083&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Odd Life of Timothy Green''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite an overly schmaltzy pro-family sentiment, this film showcases terrible parenting.&lt;br /&gt;
|$55.3 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Open Season''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't be fooled by the fact conservative star Gary Sinise is in it. This animated film is pro-environmentalism and anti-hunting.&lt;br /&gt;
|$85,105,259  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Over the Hedge''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|An animated film that depicts humans as complete idiots and demonizes exterminators for simply doing their job. Not to mention, one of the antagonists is a wealthy businesswoman and it is also pro-environmentalism.&lt;br /&gt;
|$155,019,340&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Organizer''&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Italian film that promotes [[trade union]]s.  The movie also promotes [[infidelity]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Orgazmo'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays the porn industry in a positive light and mocks both the [[Mormon]]s and the religiously devout.&lt;br /&gt;
|$602,302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''ParaNorman''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The very ending of the film pulls a swerve and reveals that one of the characters, Mitch Downe, as being homosexual, despite the fact that he was not even implied to be that throughout the movie. This decision had been made by the director Chris Butler.&lt;br /&gt;
|$107.1 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Paul'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|This extra-terrestrial rescue mission could have been a harmless comedic tribute to the science fiction film genre if it didn't portray Christians as close-minded idiots. Moreover, it promotes atheism, premarital sex, homosexuality, and drug use; and it portrays the military in negative light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37,412,945&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Perks of Being a Wallflower''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes homosexuality and also demonizes those opposed to a homosexual lifestyle. &lt;br /&gt;
|$17,738,570&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The People vs. Larry Flynt'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Idealizes [[pornography]] mogul [[Larry Flynt]] and claims that pornography is protected by the [[First Amendment]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,300,385&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Philadelphia''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Homosexual agenda setting drama.&lt;br /&gt;
|$77,446,440&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pineapple Express'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows [[drug abuse]] to be &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$87,341,380&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pink Flamingos''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Embraces horrifying people, who engage in such acts as [[incest]] and [[bestiallity]], as well as promoting the homosexual agenda, since it stars transvestite Divine and shows homosexuals in a positive light.  This film has toilet humor, finding it funny when a character (Divine) literally eats poo, and extremely offensive language, one character is even named after a racial slur against white people.  Characters promote anarchy and violence as an everyday thing.  A very graphic film, even for most liberals, showing close ups of genitalia unlike any non-porno film.  Liberals call it a &amp;quot;comedy&amp;quot;, but it is revoltingly horrid and more like an act of [[Satan]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$7,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pocahontas''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Feminist story about [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message, and also the Native American’s view against English settlers (in a similar manner to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would eventually end up entering public knowledge and provided to all universities and high schools across America two years later [see above]). In addition, the titular character also enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over Kokoum that was treated in a comparatively positive light. Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving the cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if it meant to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. As it turned out, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-than-expected box office receipts.&lt;br /&gt;
|$141,579,773&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Princess and the Frog''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals praised this film for featuring Disney's first African American princess. ''The Princess and the Frog'' promotes feminism, and is very insulting to Christianity, being filled with Louisiana Voodoo. Instead of having a Fairy Godmother, it contains a blind voodoo priestess. Finally, it mocks traditional values and portrays capitalism and positive war efforts in a negative light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$104,400,899&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Princess Mononoke''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmentalist, feminist anime film on on steroids, where the forest gods are at war with a mining colony (whom are prorated as the &amp;quot;bad guys&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,375,308 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Project X''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows teen drinking, [[drug]] use, sex, vulgar profanity and anarchic behavior to be &amp;quot;cool&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,731,865&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Quest for Camelot''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Throws everything that made Camelot (Christian values, Heroism, Bravery etc.) great out the window for the sake of being pro-feminist and wanting to be a Disney animated musical film; all of which miserably failed. Even though it's suppose to a &amp;quot;rated G family comedy&amp;quot;, moreover, there's an incest joke featured in the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.imdb.com/character/ch0100869/quotes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$22,510,798&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Quick and the Dead''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A feminist western&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,636,537	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Quills''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays the Marquis de Sade as the protagonist, in addition to the prevalence of extremely violent acts.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,732,088&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Resident Evil'' franchise&lt;br /&gt;
|2002-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R  &lt;br /&gt;
|Feminist film franchise with anti-capitalistic messages. Based on a video game franchise on the same name. The worst offender is Resident Evil: The Final Chapter. Were the villain is a [[Christian]] who releases a deadly virus (called the T-virus) which will destroy the human race and have him and rich colleagues rebuild the world in their image (a.k.a playing [[God]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|$244,443,938 (all together)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rise of the Planet of the Apes''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-business (the company the main character works for is painted in an extremely negative light), a lot of environmentalism throughout (including a more anti-human agenda being pushed), and the actor who played Caesar, Andy Serkis, as well as director Rupert Wyatt, both compared Caesar positively to the Marxist Argentinian revolutionary terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$481,801,049&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rent'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes [[homosexuality]] and cross-dressing as &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; lifestyles. &lt;br /&gt;
|$29,077,547&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Rock of Ages''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (Director's Cut is rated R)&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the highly unoriginal and unimaginative Broadway musical, ''Rock of Ages'' features poor [[moral]]s, promotes homosexual agenda, prostitution, drug use, and drinking, and portrays conservatives in a negative, offensively bigoted viewpoint. Many gratuitous sex scenes and sexual references are prominently shown.&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,518,613&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Salo: Or the 120 Days of Sodom''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Adaptation of the [[sadist]] and [[Libertine]] and atheistic text by [[Marquis de Sade]] from Communist homosexual filmmaker Pier Paolo Pasolini, who was killed shortly after completing this movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sausage Party''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As the first R-rated American animated film to be released by a major film studio (i.e. the ultra-liberal Columbia Pictures of Sony Pictures Entertainment) in the United States following 1999's ''South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut'', ''Sausage Party'' blatantly criticizes religion and promotes the false deception that without religion and the existence of God, everyone can enjoy the most selfish, crude, and debauchery activities (e.g. humanism, homosexuality, obscenity, and non-stop sexual intercourse) without guilt or a sense of a &amp;quot;religious obligation&amp;quot;. A typical offensive and raunchy comedy film by modern Hollywood standards, directors Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan, producer Megan Ellison, producer/writer Evan Goldberg, and producer/writer/actor Seth Rogen (all of them extremely liberal and some, ironically, Jewish) made this film to bastardize the animation genre, as well as to push the liberal Hollywood agenda on politics and religion.&lt;br /&gt;
|$89,645,124&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Secret World of Arrietty''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Japanese anime film is about a tiny homeless family that steals from regular people. Demonizes capitalism and promotes redistribution of wealth.&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,202,743&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sex and the City''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Very disturbing film, much like its TV series counterpart, promoting the use of sex everywhere.&lt;br /&gt;
|$152,647,258.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sex Tape''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-family. The main premise of the film was two nymphomaniacs trying to create a sex tape of themselves after getting kids killed the sex drive, and then recovering iPods that accidentally uploaded their tape online for everyone to see. The ending also has brief yet graphic sex scene showing what exactly was on the sex tape.&lt;br /&gt;
|$38,543,473&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shakespeare in Love''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals changing history in order to suit feminists. The film also suggests that a woman was responsible for William Shakespeare's work (even though there's no record of this at all). Although it won the Academy Award for Best Picture of 1998 (thanks to the aggressive campaign tactics of the egotistical producer Harvey Weinstein), the film has aged poorly and, to this day, the overwhelmingly majority of critics and film viewers believe that the conservative film and Steven Spielberg's masterpiece ''Saving Private Ryan'' should have won instead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SrNphaLsDs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$100,317,794&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shark Tale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes multiculturalism and the deuteragonist of the film is a great white shark who is a vegetarian, and is a metaphor for being homosexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gaylife.about.com/od/moviestheatre/a/sharktale.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$160,861,908&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''She Hate Me''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Taking jabs at capitalism &amp;amp; supporting the [[homosexual agenda]], this film has a very over the top plot were a man who's laid off from from his job for exposing corrupt business practices, turns to impregnating wealthy lesbians for profit. (This really is the plot).&lt;br /&gt;
|$366,037&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Small Soldiers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-military (due to the Commando Elite being depicted in a negative manner, and to a certain extent GloboTech, the ones responsible for the bad events in the film, being stated to be a Defense Contractor) and also anti-Capitalist (due to GloboTech being the ones responsible for the events of the film, including buying out the Heartland Toy Company.).&lt;br /&gt;
|$71.1 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Social Network'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the [[gossip]] website [censored], which feeds [[narcissism]] and destroys marriages.  The film also portrays drug use and [[misogyny]] in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$96,962,694&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''South Park: Bigger, Longer &amp;amp; Uncut''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A disgusting celebration of [[obscenity]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|$83,137,603&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Spring Breakers'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|From the creator of ''Kids'', this film is similar in its pornographic nature and glamorization of drug abuse, only this film takes it to a new extreme.  Furthermore, this film promotes [[feminism]] and glamorizes the gangster/[[ghetto]] [[rap music]] lifestyle, while condemning Christians, labeling them as &amp;quot;weak&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;insecure&amp;quot;. Also, the film contains a full on sex scene in the pool, and show nudity, in not only that scene but several others&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,724,284&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek Beyond''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The film has [[Sulu|Hikaru Sulu]] as a &amp;quot;married&amp;quot; homosexual with an adopted daughter, which was a decision that even [[George Takei]] (Sulu's original actor and a prominent gay activist) took issue with.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://time.com/4398071/george-takei-simon-pegg-sulu-gay-star-trek-beyond/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$343.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Stepford Wives''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Feminist]] [[polemic]]. Ends with the protagonist beating her husband with an iron fireplace poker. The film's release coincided with the height of the [[ERA]] movement.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Stonewall''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the 1969 Stonewall Riots, this film is a pro-homosexual film that pushes the homosexual agenda. It's rather ironically to note that the film, itself, is a victim of historical revisionism, offensive racial stereotypes, and exclusion of the representation of minorities. While the filmmakers tried to defend their artistic decisions, the film was overwhelmingly criticized by critics and audiences (even liberals, not surprisingly, hated the film) and failed to make its play for awards consideration during the 2015 Oscar season.&lt;br /&gt;
|$187,674&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Superbad''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes the teenage use of drugs, smoking, alcohol and sex. The whole point of the movie is for a couple of guys to lose their virginity. The movie contains many uses of profanity, underage drinking, and drug use.&lt;br /&gt;
|$121,463,226&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Taking Woodstock''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Glorifies the anarchistic and chaotic Woodstock festival in 1969 as well as the Hippie Movement, painting their various lewd actions in a positive light. Also has some elements of anti-Semitism due to the main character's parents who acted as Holocaust survivors being portrayed in an unsympathetic light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$10 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tammy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Movie about a lazy unemployed woman who after losing her job, basically turns to a life of crime. As the film is about her and her grandma hitting the road, committing robberies, doing illegal prescription drugs, and buying beers for teenagers.  They have a Fourth of July party with no typical festivities, and is more like a drunken sex party, as the grandma reveals her breasts to the guest (the audience does not see them though).  &lt;br /&gt;
|$84,525,432&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tank Girl''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the left wing comic, this film glorifies feminism and debauchery while making the capitalists the bad guys.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,064,495&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''That's My Boy''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R (originally NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts pedophilia, statutory rape, gerontophilia, child neglect, incest, and other forms of aberrant sexuality as funny.&lt;br /&gt;
|$57.7 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''There's Something About Mary''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Contains gratuitous sex and jokes about bodily functions.&lt;br /&gt;
|$176,484,651&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Trash H*****s'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Shows decadent behavior in a positive light and glamorizes sexual deviancy.  Also the film is riddled with profanity, even the title has a naughty word (which was censored here).&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Uncle Sam''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the heroes as a jaded amputated war veteran and a draft dodger, and the main villain as an extremely sociopathic soldier who joined the Army to kill as many people as he wanted, and the latter is depicted as being hyper-patriotic.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Under the Same Moon (La Misma Luna)''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Baselessly supports illegal immigration despite a pro-family sentiment.&lt;br /&gt;
|$23,311,391&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Up In Smoke''&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Stoner film that just promotes the use of smoking marijuana &lt;br /&gt;
|$44,364,244&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Waterworld''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Suggests that [[global warming]] was real, and the earth has now become a flooded post-apocalyptic wasteland.&lt;br /&gt;
|$88,246,220&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''We're the Millers''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays drug dealers, strippers, and lying in order to hide your identity in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$150,394,119&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Wolf of Wall Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly promotes excessive, endless drug use, portraying it in a positive light, and claiming that illegal drugs such as heroin give people the will to keep working hard and stay focused and positive, as well as various forms of graphic and illicit sexual activity and voyeurism, (both heterosexual and in one scene, homosexual) and non-stop use of the f-word and hundreds of other profanities throughout. Portrays capitalists on [[Wall Street]] as greedy self-absorbed criminals obsessed with sex, drugs and violence in the form of the protagonist Jordan Belfort. Many audiences were shocked that this did not receive an NC-17 rating upon its release, especially since morality-deprived director [[Martin Scorsese]] broke the ''[[South Park]]'' movie's record for most uses of the F-word with his film. Christina McDowell, the daughter of Tom Prousalis, one of the people involved in Belfort's crimes, wrote a memoir on the subject specifically to call out Scorsese and DiCaprio for failing to recognize the victims of Belfort in the film, something even the most praiseworthy critics of the film admitted was a flaw.&lt;br /&gt;
|$116,900,694&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''W.R.: Mystery of the Organism''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Essentially a plotless film riddled with disgusting orgies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''X-Men'' trilogy&lt;br /&gt;
|2000-2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 (R for Deadpool)&lt;br /&gt;
|Unlike the comics they're based on (which were about civil rights)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nuskool.com/learn/lesson/mlk-and-malcolm-x-the-civil-rights-movement-and-the-x-men-origins/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; liberals used this movie franchise to further the [[homosexual agenda]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T543J2L-gXU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cracked.com/article_20497_5-great-movies-with-mind-blowing-symbolism-you-didnt-notice.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bryan Singer director of four of the films (whom is also homosexual) was also cited for sexual assault of a minor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/18/business/media/in-lawsuit-director-of-new-x-men-film-is-accused-of-sexual-assault.html?rref=homepage&amp;amp;_r=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It was also anti-Military, especially in the second film and to some extent X-Men Origins: Wolverine, as the main villain, William Stryker, was the head of a para-military group and depicted as very genocidal against mutants, and was also implied to be a Vietnam War veteran. This had been added in by screenwriter David Hayter, due to his experiences with the ''[[Metal Gear Solid]]'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,817,894,919	(all together)  &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Schlockumentary==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The 11th Hour]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmental schlockumentary produced and narrated by actor [[Leonardo DiCaprio]] which endorses the theory of [[Anthropogenic global warming]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$707,343&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Almost any movie by [[Michael Moore]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Does it really need to be said?&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[An Inconvenient Truth]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Al Gore]]'s [[global warming]] alarmist [[schlockumentary]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,146,161&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Arctic Tale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary film geared towards children that pushes the false narrative of global warming and polar bears going extinct from melting ice caps.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,858,064&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Better This World''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|2011 documentary &amp;quot;feature length lie&amp;quot; is a [[PBS]] film regarding the thwarted domestic terrorist attack at the 2008 [[Republican National Convention]] and liberals attempt to re-write history.&lt;br /&gt;
|NA-TV&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Blackfish''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A [[CNN]] documentary film about the captivity of Tilikum, an orca involved in the deaths of three individuals, and the consequences of keeping orcas in captivity, that is nothing but a propaganda film full of so many lies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://seaworldcares.com/the-facts/truth-about-blackfish/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film gained high ratings on movie review websites, making it seem the film brainwashes critics.&lt;br /&gt;
|$2,073,582&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Bowling for Columbine]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A 2002 schlockumentary directed by and starring [[leftist]] propagandist Michael Moore. It is a pro-[[gun control]] film and distorts facts in favor of gun-grabbing. Also included a &amp;quot;Brief history of the USA&amp;quot; segment using animation mirroring that of [[South Park]], that distorted historical facts to make it seem as though guns were implemented by racists, which actually led to the South Park [[libertarian]] creators to condemn him, enough to give Moore a cameo in Team America as a suicide bomber and make his death especially graphic.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21,576,018&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Cosmos: A SpaceTime Odyssey&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|TV-PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Darwinist and global-warming-alarmist propaganda disguised as science.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Jesus Camp]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006 &lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Baselessly attacks Conservative Christianity; incited [[liberal vandalism]] of the Bible camp shown in the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$902,544&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hearts and Minds''&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary about the Vietnam War that was inherently anti-American in its nature. Also, depicts [[Catholic]]s as bigots. It also had a brief clip at the beginning which had the rolling crew having one of the higher officers forced to talk to them with the false promise that they'd burn the tape once he is finished with it. It also has several moments of graphic sex between soldiers and Vietnamese prostitutes. It also implies throughout the film that several atrocities conducted by the North Vietnamese communists were done by Americans, including the footage where a girl ends up burned by [[napalm]] and running out naked. Noteworthy for being almost single-handedly responsible for forcing America out of Vietnam (even having the NVA mailing the producers thanking them for &amp;quot;ensuring peace&amp;quot; in Vietnam) as well as it being an influence for far-left schlockumentarist/propagandist Michael Moore, with some of its filming techniques even being reused for ''Farenheit 9/11''.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Inside Job'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A 2010 film by Democrat donor Charles Ferguson. Blames the Great Recession on Wall Street, unspecified deregulations, the Bush Administration, and so on. Whitewashes [[Fannie Mae]] and [[Freddie Mac]]'s role and virtually eschews any mention of the Community Reinvestment Act. Despite claims of being nonpartisan, it contains various interviews with Democratic politicians while including none with Republican politicians. Claims the financial system corrupted politics; capitalists are the bad guys. &lt;br /&gt;
|$4,312,735&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Truthers]] Dylan Avery and Korey Rowe blame America for [[9/11]]&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lost in Tel Aviv''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|A film depicting a couple intent on making a filthy [[South Park]]-esque cartoon as heroes.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Makers: Women who Make America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013-2014&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary glorifying [[Feminism]], in particular, the faction that started with [[Betty Friedan]]'s ''The Second Sex''. Also features as examples of role models and pioneers of feminism such degenerates as [[Lena Dunham]] (creator of the Worst Liberal TV Series ''Girls''), Linda Woolverton, [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Ellen DeGeneres]], [[Jane Fonda]], and [[Gloria Allred]]. On top of that, there's no mention of conservatives [[Margaret Thatcher]], [[Sarah Palin]], [[Phyllis Schlafly]], [[Michele Bachman]] or [[Carly Fiorina]]. Only showing more of their bias.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Mea Maxima Culpa: Silence in the House of God'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Christian schlock directed by liberal Alex Gibney&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Religulous'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Jewish]] &amp;quot;Comedian&amp;quot; [[Bill Maher]] tries to convince the audience of the folly of all religion, with a special focus on Christianity.&lt;br /&gt;
|$13,011,160&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Road We’ve Traveled]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|Not rated&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Tom Hanks]] directs &amp;amp; narrates Barack Obama's supposed achievements&lt;br /&gt;
|NA&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Roger &amp;amp; Me''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Michael Moore]] blames capitalism for the downfall of Flint, Michigan instead of the [[trade unions]] that bullied businesses &amp;amp; forced them to ship jobs overseas (due to excessive taxation) or the fact that Flint has been under [[Democratic]] leadership since 1973. Later on, Moore would also admit that he never interviewed Roger Smith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://callcenterinfo.tmcnet.com/news/2007/06/16/2717913.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|$6,706,368 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Selling of the Pentagon''&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Extremely dishonest anti-American/anti-Vietnam War propaganda published by CBS. Was notorious for the producers refusing to divulge their sources to the Pentagon and at least one of the officials involved entering a minor lawsuit against CBS.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dan Rather's Day of Reckoning&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/dan-rathers-day-of-reckoning/article/5895&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''She's Beautiful When She's Angry'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Nothing more than feminist propaganda being passed off as truth.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Super Size Me'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Blames [[obesity]] on great capitalist paragons like [[McDonald's]] and [[Sodexo]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,536,423&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Tax the Rich: An Animated Fairytale''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|An animated film written by [[Fred Glass]], narrated by [[Ed Asner]], and made for the California Federation of Teachers. It repeated rhetoric made by the [[Occupy Wall Street]] group about taxing the rich to have &amp;quot;their fair share&amp;quot; and demonized Capitalism in various ways, including blaming it on Asian sweatshops as well as the housing bubble bursting in 2008. [[Kirsten Powers]], a member of [[The Daily Beast]], and herself no stranger to liberal politics, acknowledged alongside conservative economist for ''The Daily Caller'' Tucker Carson on the Sean Hannity show that the cartoon was simply inexcusable and disgusting, with Sean Hannity also explicitly referring to it as a &amp;quot;disgusting hit piece&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sean-hannity-slams-ed-asner-398102&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://reagancoalition.com/articles/2012/20121206006-ca-union-class.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film was particularly infamous for a scene where, in a segment covering the trickle-down effect, a corpulent rich man representing the 1% of wealthy Americans, after having the scales literally stacked up in his favor regarding money, upon being asked why the 1% needed so much money, he responded &amp;quot;Don't worry, this is good for you too, it will trickle down from us to you&amp;quot;, with the latter statement being accompanied with a graphic of the rich man proceeding to urinate on the other ordinary people as they yell in protest. Although later versions freeze the footage just before the man pees on the crowd in response to the complaints about the scene, it was still implied by residual audio of the urine stream. Sean Hannety and Michelle Malkin of the Sean Hannety Show both expressed disgust with the video when covering it, and when one of the producers confronted Ed Asner as the latter was about to attend one of his roles at a play, the latter falsely claimed he didn't remember what he said on it, and also claimed that the bit about rich people peeing on poor people was disgusting only because it should have been in reverse, and then asked the producer if he had any money, and if so, if he should &amp;quot;p*** on [the producer].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr1ZzsAzq_M&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Tillman Story''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A liberals view of the circumstances surrounding the death of football star and [[Army Ranger]] [[Pat Tillman]]. The film portrays each and every fact as sinister. Plus, each and every fact is evidence of a conspiracy. Typical Hollywood [[George W. Bush]] bashing flick. The [[liberal bias]] was clear, make Tillman a liberal [[atheist]] anti-war hero that was cannon-fodder for the government. Tillman's actions speak louder than any twisted accusations presented in this documentary.&lt;br /&gt;
|$802,535&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Under the Gun''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-second amendment, the film was criticized for its inaccuracies.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Uncounted Enemy: A Vietnam Deception''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-American/Anti-Vietnam War propaganda that infamously accused General [[William Westmoreland]] of deliberately understating the force strength of the [[Vietcong]] during the Tet Offensive. This resulted in a libel suit made by Westmoreland against CBS that promptly went to court after an internal investigation was issued due to ''TV Guide'' finding damning evidence of similar journalistic malpractice that was practiced in the earlier documentary/propaganda ''The Selling of the Pentagon'', which ultimately resulted in CBS losing its libel insurance, as well as the documentary unit being scrapped when [[Larry Tisch]] took over in 1987.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dan Rather's Day of Reckoning&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Wall Within''&lt;br /&gt;
|June 2, 1988&lt;br /&gt;
|Unrated&lt;br /&gt;
|A documentary helmed by extremely liberal &amp;quot;journalist&amp;quot; [[Dan Rather]] that reinforced the false image of Vietnam War veterans being anti-social degenerates suffering from PTSD and drug abuse. Was also particularly infamous in that all six of the &amp;quot;veterans&amp;quot; that were interviewed were later confirmed by various documents to have never even served during the events they mentioned, and even the one who actually DID serve did not do so with boots on the ground and was a repairman.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://loonybird.com/media_dan_rather.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Winter Soldier''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|The 1972 film about U.S. troops from [[Vietnam]] put on record as baby killers, [[human rights]] violators, and general disservice to America. This myth was propagated by a few anti-war activist liberal actors that never did see combat in Vietnam and some were never in the country. The initial result was to hold hearings in [[Congress]] over the matter. All allegations were proven fabrications, falsehoods, and lies.&lt;br /&gt;
|Unknown&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Years of Living Dangerously'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|Environmental schlockumentary spearheaded by ultra-liberal, [[James Cameron]], and featuring several proponents of [[Hollywood Values]] trying to preach the false idea of [[climate change]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Anti-Christian==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''2001: A Space Odyssey''&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Controversial upon its release for its atheistic themes and is notorious for its support of the [[Theory of evolution]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,954,992&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''After Earth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly promotes the theory of evolution and [[Scientology]] themes. The film is also notorious for being a huge box office flop and further tarnishing M. Night Shyamalan's career.&lt;br /&gt;
|$60,522,097&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
||Almost any movie directed by Luis Buñuel &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|Luis Buñuel was an atheist and was a bigot towards Christians.  He would unjustly ridicule Christians in all of his movies and was a pioneer in making this schlock being considered &amp;quot;art&amp;quot; when it is really just offensive, vulgar and grotesque liberal smut.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Antichrist'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|A gruesome movie with horrifying imagery juxtaposed to Christian symbols.&lt;br /&gt;
|$791,867&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Battlefield Earth''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Alien invasion sci-fi film which serves as a thinly-veiled promotion of Scientology. The film was a huge box-office flop and is largely considered to be one of the worst movies ever made. The film, even, infamously won nine categories within the Golden Raspberry Awards (Razzie Awards), which until ''Jack and Jill'' was the most Raspberry awards given to a single film, as well as winning the separate awards for &amp;quot;Worst Drama of our first 25 Years&amp;quot; during the 2005 awards, as well as &amp;quot;Worst Picture of the Decade&amp;quot; in 2010. Also plays into the liberal notion of personal characteristics mattering more than true merits, since John Travolta was cast as the main character because of his affiliation with the Scientology &amp;quot;church&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$21 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Bedazzled''&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|If the fact that the film has someone who sells his soul to the Devil in exchange for seven wishes isn't enough, the film suggests that [[Satan]] is a woman too. This film was, unfortunately, remade in 2000. &lt;br /&gt;
|$1,500,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Book of Mormon''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Mormon musical that mocks every aspect of the Mormon religion. There are several biblical inaccuracies just for the sake of it. It also has a Ugandan tribesman swear against God in their own language.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Boondock Saints''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The characters are supposed to be Christians (or &amp;quot;saints&amp;quot; as the title suggests), but they show themselves as anything but. They dispense their own form of vigilante justice (summary execution) and say the F-word in every sentence. There's also an FBI agent who chases them who is hinted throughout the film to be [[homosexual]]. Overall, the film is just a vulgar ''[[Death Wish]]'' rip-off. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Breaking the Waves''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Wrongly claims that God rewards and endorses adulterers and prostitution.  Demonizes devout Christians, portraying them as &amp;quot;villains&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,803,298&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Canterbury Tales''&lt;br /&gt;
|1972 (Italy and West Germany)&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;1980 (USA)&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|Directed by communist homosexual Italian director Pier Paolo Pasolini, the film is an utter butchering of the seminal work by Geoffery Chaucer and even included scenes exclusive to the movie that promoted a left-wing and inherently anti-Christian viewpoint. Among the most infamous additions included two priests engaging in sodomy and only one actually getting punished via execution due to being poor and thus unable to bribe his way out, and also a scene where Satan is seen defecating out screaming friars.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Cloud Atlas'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Supports the idea of reincarnation and features anti-Christian undertones.  Additionally, supports the idea of homosexuality and [[transvestitism]], as many of the characters are resurrected as the opposite sex, while still played by the same actor.  This idea of supporting homosexuality is further brought to the forefront as one of the movie's directors recently came out as having had a sex change operation as a way to promote the movie.&lt;br /&gt;
|$27,108,272 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Craft''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts witchcraft in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,819,936&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Da Vinci Code]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes the false theory that [[Jesus]] Christ married [[Mary Magdalene]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$217,536,138&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dead Poets Society''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A worldly literature professor, Peter Keating (Robin Williams) shown as inspiring and &amp;quot;open-minded&amp;quot;, is contrasted with the conservative Christian boarding school where he teaches, portrayed as conformist, oppressive, and materialistic. The film also appears to promote teen suicide, as one of the main characters is able to commit suicide without a negative word ever being uttered against his actions by any positive character. &lt;br /&gt;
|$95,860,116&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Dogma'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Mocks religion and [[Catholic]]ism in particular, with cheap smutty jokes and wrongly portraying [[God]] as female.&lt;br /&gt;
|$30,652,890&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Exodus: Gods and Kings''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts the prophet Moses as an atheist and a terrorist. Glenn Beck said that this movie essentially turned Moses into &amp;quot;an al-Qaeda member&amp;quot; who &amp;quot;doesn't want to rely on God anymore&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$65,014,513&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Forty Days and Forty Nights''&lt;br /&gt;
|2002&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A vulgar sex comedy where the main character has to give up sex for Lent, with his ex-girlfriend trying to tempt him throughout the entire time. Also had the noteworthy aspect of actually being released ''during'' the lent season. This resulted in President of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights William Donohue requesting to both then-[[Disney]] CEO [[Michael Eisner]] and Harvey Weinstein that they reschedule the airing of the film, citing that &amp;quot;To show a film that parodies Lent in a most vulgar way is bad enough, but to show it during Lent is outrageous.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.catholicleague.org/appeal-to-michael-eisner-and-harvey-weinstein-reschedule-40-days-and-40-nights/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, despite the inflammatory material in the movie, the [[Anti-Defamation League]] head Foxman did not call out the film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$37,950,822 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Golden Compass'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the atheistic ''His Dark Materials'' series.&lt;br /&gt;
|$70,107,728&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hail Mary'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|NR&lt;br /&gt;
|Marxist filmmaker, Jean-Luc Godard, decided to retell the story of Mary and Joseph in the modern day.  As per his business casual, it was ultra-controversial upon its release.  [[Pope John Paul II]] condemned it, claiming it was likely to offend the deeply religious because of its explicit nudity.  Additionally, it depicts Joseph as a womanizing man [censored] and Mary in a similar light, as there is a montage where she is completely in the nude for no apparent reason.  The film was banned in deeply religious countries such as [[Brazil]] and [[Argentina]].&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Haunting of Molly Hartley''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Depicts Christians as either starry-eyed kooks or homicidal maniacs while depicting implied-to-be-Satanism as a happy lifestyle.&lt;br /&gt;
|$15,418,749&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hercules''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Film seems to take a more atheistic turn on the Greek hero as opposed to the mythology behind Hercules.&lt;br /&gt;
|$72,688,614 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-    &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Hunchback of Notre Dame''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Released during liberal maniac [[Michael Eisner]]'s reign of terror at Disney. The film does everything in its power to demonize Christianity. It is also to be noted that the original source material was not supposed to be given to children yet the Disney film was marketed as such to kids, and in some cases, the film actually managed to be even more darker than the original tale (case in point, originally, Quasimodo's vicious punishment at the hands of the Parisians during the Feast of Fools ceremony was out of corporal punishment, while in the Disney film, it had been done at the whim of the Parisians just for the sake of it. Another example of the film being made darker than the book was the inclusion of a gypsy genocide plot that wasn't even alluded to at all in the original tale). This was a stark contrast to most other Disney films which usually toned down the original works (like in ''The Jungle Book'', where Disney advised the writers to ignore the book specifically because its contents were unsuitable for children). The film, in addition, features some mild swearing (namely the word &amp;quot;damnation&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;eternal damnation&amp;quot;). There was also a scene where one of the male gargoyles fell in love with Djali, who was explicitly male, which may have been a subtle attempt at promoting homosexuality, despite his being one of the gargoyles of Notre Dame.&lt;br /&gt;
|$100,138,851	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Inherit the Wind''&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Hollywood perpetuated complete lies about the [[Scopes Trial]] in this film in order to smear Christianity, including: portraying [[William Jennings Bryan]] as being ignorant, harsh and punitive, based on a false portrayal of his actions and testimony, falsely claiming that at the end Bryan, in a senseless fit of madness, died in the courtroom amid &amp;quot;caring&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;reasonable&amp;quot; [[Darwin]]ists and falsely portraying the Darwinists in a positive light and the Christians as &amp;quot;deceitful&amp;quot;. In real life, Bryan and the Christians won the trial and were charitable to the end, while the Darwinist Darrow was deceitful in reneging on his deal to take the witness stand after Bryan did. &lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingdom of Heaven'' (theatrical version)&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Revisionist history that portrays the Muslims as the &amp;quot;victims&amp;quot; of the Crusades. Directed by atheist Ridley Scott.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47.4 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Last Temptation of Christ]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The film's eponymous final sequence depicts the crucified Jesus—tempted by what turns out to be Satan in the form of a beautiful, androgynous child—experiencing a dream or alternative reality where he comes down from the cross, marries Mary Magdalene (and later Mary and Martha), and lives out his life as a full mortal man. He learns on his deathbed that he was deceived by [[Satan]] and begs God to let him &amp;quot;be [God's] son,&amp;quot; at which point he finds himself once again on the cross. At other points in the film, Jesus is depicted as building crosses for the Romans, being tormented by the voice of God, and lamenting the many sins he believes he has committed.&lt;br /&gt;
Because of these departures from the gospel narratives—and especially a brief scene wherein Jesus and Mary Magdalene consummate their marriage—several Christian groups organized vocal protests and boycotts of the film prior to and upon its release. One protest, organized by a religious Californian radio station, gathered 600 protesters to picket the headquarters of Universal Studios' then-parent company MCA. One of the protestors dressed up as MCA's Chairman Lew Wasserman and pretended to drive nails through Jesus' hands into a wooden cross. Evangelist Bill Bright offered to buy the film's negative from Universal in order to destroy it. The protests were effective in convincing several theater chains not to screen the film. One of those chains, General Cinemas, later apologized to Scorsese for doing so. &lt;br /&gt;
Mother Angelica, a Catholic nun and foundress of Eternal Word Television Network, described ''Last Temptation'' as &amp;quot;the most blasphemous ridicule of the Eucharist that's ever been perpetrated in this world&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a holocaust movie that has the power to destroy souls eternally.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
In some countries, including Greece, Turkey, Mexico, Chile, and Argentina, the film was banned or censored for several years. As of July 2010, the film continues to be banned in the Philippines and Singapore.&lt;br /&gt;
|$8,373,585&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Legion''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blasphemous film that says God uses an army of angels to wipe out humanity. Ignoring Psalm 91:11 which stated he will send his angels to protect you.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$40,168,080 	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Ledge''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|Not Rated&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly promotes atheism by depicting, as atheist screenplay writer Matthew Chapman explicitly put it, the first openly atheist hero in American cinema. Also misleadingly depicted Christianity, via the character Jon, as being &amp;quot;bigoted&amp;quot;, abusive, and domineering. It is also to be noted that it was a box office flop that received a lot of poor reviews.&lt;br /&gt;
|$610,986&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Life of Brian''&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Do we really need to explain?&lt;br /&gt;
|$19,398,164&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Messenger: The Story of Joan of Arc''&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Distorts history, portraying the prominent historical figure Joan of Arc as psychologically and emotionally unstable, impulsive, prone to mood swings, and having led the French army to victory purely out of selfishness, cruelty, and vengeance, despite all historical evidence proving the contrary. The filmmakers made the film to criticize Roman Catholicism and the Catholics.&lt;br /&gt;
|$66,976,317&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Monty Python's The Meaning of Life]]'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Do we really need to explain?&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,929,552 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Most Hated Woman in America''&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Just when you thought Hollywood couldn't sink any lower. They go out and make a bio-flick about [[Madalyn Murray O'Hair]] (responsible for ending official Bible-reading in American public schools in 1963 [[Atheism and Mass Murder|which ended up with disastrous results liberals refuse to talk about]]) and not surprising turn her into a martyr.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''Noah'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Liberals take on the classic story from the [[Book of Genesis]].  Going along with their usual M.O., this film shoehorns harmful messages that had nothing to do with the original story, such as [[environmentalism]], living on a vegan diet, and most notably, the promotion of the [[Theory of Evolution]] as &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot;. In addition to completely screwing up the original account, many traits of the &amp;quot;bad guys&amp;quot; appeared to be more biblical than the &amp;quot;good guys&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Patterson, Roger &amp;amp; Chaffey, Tim (March 29, 2014). [https://answersingenesis.org/noahs-ark/noah-movie-detailed-review/ The ''Noah'' Movie: Our Detailed Review]. ''Answers in Genesis''. Retrieved August 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$101,200,044&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Oh! Heavenly Dog''&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Don't let the title fool you. The movie is anything but heavenly, as it mocks Christianity and presents a false depiction of reincarnation.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Paul'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The moral of the film, according to the movie's liberal atheist writers and co-stars Simon Pegg and Nick Frost, is that &amp;quot;there is no God&amp;quot; and anyone who believes in Him is &amp;quot;an ignorant boob&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$97,984,015&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Practical Magic''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13 &lt;br /&gt;
|Yet another film glorifying witchcraft and attempting to mix romantic comedy into it (which even puzzled liberal critics).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/practical_magic/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was one of the many wiccan movies released during the late 90's.&lt;br /&gt;
|$46,683,377&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Priest'' &lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Blatantly anti-Catholic and pro-homosexual.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,165,845&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Road to El Dorado''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Main villain is a corrupt and war-hungry religious zealot seeking to seize power from the chief of the legendary city of gold, El Dorado. Since the animated film was produced by liberal elitist [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]] it wouldn't be surprising that he was probably referencing the [[Republican party]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$50,863,742&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Political correctness for the sake of political correctness. The Christianity of Robin Hood and his Merry Men is heavily downplayed, save for Friar Tuck's initial bigotry toward the Muslim character Azeem. Azeem, who had never been present in the Robin Hood legends but was a character created for this version of the Robin Hood saga, is depicted as a wise, open-minded, tolerant mystic. Robin Hood and Azeem are portrayed by liberals Kevin Costner and Morgan Freeman respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
|$390.5 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sausage Party''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|As the first R-rated American animated film to be released by a major film studio (i.e. the ultra-liberal Columbia Pictures of Sony Pictures Entertainment) in the United States following 1999's ''South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut'', ''Sausage Party'' blatantly criticizes religion and promotes the false deception that without religion and the existence of God, everyone can enjoy the most selfish, crude, and debauched activities (e.g. humanism, homosexuality, obscenity, and non-stop sexual intercourse) without guilt or a sense of a &amp;quot;religious obligation&amp;quot;. A typical offensive and raunchy comedy film by modern Hollywood standards, directors Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan, producer Megan Ellison, producer/writer Evan Goldberg, and producer/writer/actor Seth Rogen (all of them extremely liberal and some, ironically, Jewish) made this film to bastardize the animation genre, as well as to push the liberal Hollywood agenda on politics and religion. Animation films, for the past century, have enthralled and enhanced audiences around the world, as it features a timely story that children, teenagers, and adults alike can relate and like. The filmmakers seemed to not care about any of it, as they made this untimely film strictly for adults, as they &amp;quot;believed&amp;quot; that there aren't any animated films for adults to like. That point is made very clear by the film's criticism and parody of all the other animated films (namely the Disney animated films), as well as the presence of noted songwriter and regular Disney collaborator Alan Menken as the film's songwriter. The film, itself, is actually painfully unfunny and has both no plot and an extremely low philosophical merit. Upon release, only the liberal biased film critics praised the film, while everyone else hated it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On a side note, ''Sausage Party'' has also attracted a great deal of criticism on two additional issues: 1.) the animators worked under poor, cruel conditions and were forced by the directors to work overtime without pay. Thirty-six of the 83 animators were blacklisted and went uncredited in the film, believed to be due to their complaints; comments made in anonymous interviews of some of the animators involved in the project by Variety, The Washington Post, and The Hollywood Reporter alleged that the comments were accurate. All the animators in the film were told outright that they would be blacklisted if they did not work overtime without pay. Finally, 2.) a red-band trailer for the film was accidentally played before a showing of the Walt Disney Pictures/Pixar Animation Studios' PG-rated and family-oriented ''Finding Dory'', at a Concord, California multiplex in mid-June 2016, which forgot to switch out an adult-audience trailer roll for one meant for G and PG-rated films, when adding additional screens to carry ''Finding Dory'' to meet audience demand. The incident occurred only once, and the theater apologized, while Rogen tweeted that the story &amp;quot;made his day&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|$89,645,124&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''September Dawn''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Mormon propaganda that blatantly distorts history. The Mountain Meadows Massacre was perpetrated by a group of Mormons, but, despite what this movie says, Church authority did not authorize such an act, and they still condemn it to this day. This movie was strategically released in order to muddy the waters of Mitt Romney's 2008 presidential campaign. Fortunately, the filmmakers did not get away with their heinous crimes, as ''September Dawn'' received extremely negative reviews from film critics, very weak box office receipts, and a Golden Raspberry Award nomination.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,066,555&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Silent Hill''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Based on the horror-themed video game series with the same name (go figure), the film portrays Christians as cult-like and evil.&lt;br /&gt;
|$46,982,632 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Silent Night, Deadly Night''&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|An anti-Christian film where a man becomes a serial killer after abuse from the Christian orphanage he grew up in. Conservatives successfully protested the film and it ended up getting pulled from theaters one week after its release. &lt;br /&gt;
|$2,491,460&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Spotlight''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Another film bashing Christianity. The &amp;quot;heroes&amp;quot; uncover a scandal of child molestation in the Catholic Church. The film portrays them as &amp;quot;brave&amp;quot; (because Hollywood hasn't bashed Christianity enough) but ignores the fact that homosexual infiltrators within the Church, seeking to discredit and damage the Church, were responsible for the atrocities and their subsequent coverup. Strangely, the same unspeakable acts have been happening legally in Islamic nations but they are conveniently ignored by the liberal media (if the journalists uncovered that, then that would be an example of bravery). It also downplays the effect homosexuality had by having several characters specifically deny that homosexuality was a factor in their victimization and subsequent turns to homosexuality.&lt;br /&gt;
|$45,055,776 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Star Trek V: The Final Frontier''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes secular humanism and portrays the religiously devout as violent and ruthless. Even liberal biased critics didn't like it, as it won three Golden Raspberry Awards (Razzie Awards), including Worst Picture of 1989, and was nominated for three more Razzies.&lt;br /&gt;
|$63 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sunshine''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-religious apocalyptic film full of scientific inaccuracy. Christianity is embodied in a homicidal psychopath, who believes that it is the will of God for the world to end. This Christian is willing to kill anyone who gets in the way of what he believes is the will of God. Atheism is portrayed as &amp;quot;sympathetic&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;kind&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;pro-humanity&amp;quot; - the opposite of what it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Truman Show''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Promotes both atheism and humanism. Truman doesn't realize his seemingly ordinary life is a reality TV show, overseen by Christof, the show's heartless and manipulative creator. Christof lives in the fake sky above Truman, watching over him, controlling everything from the weather to Truman's destiny. He is an allegorical substitute for the Christian God. (Notice &amp;quot;Christ&amp;quot; in his name.) Truman must escape from the false world of the show (Christianity) and triumph over Christof. As Truman appears to walk on water in the ending, the film is displaying the false, human-worshipping sentiment that man can replace God and be Lord of his own life.&lt;br /&gt;
|$31,542,121&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Victor Frankenstein''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Dr. Frankenstein is now one of the most openly atheist protagonists in cinema.&lt;br /&gt;
|$34.2 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Debatable Whether Liberal==&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Film&lt;br /&gt;
!Year&lt;br /&gt;
!Rating&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
!Gross (Domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''21 Jump Street''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Two police officers try to take down a drug ring in high school where the villains are environmentalists and drug dealers. But contains many sexual references, full profanity, and many religious insults. A parodic comedy remake of the 1987–91 [[Fox Network]] police drama of the same name.&lt;br /&gt;
|$201,585,328&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Accepted''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|It criticizes the [[Department of Education]] (or colleges and universities in general) and our protagonist lives the America dream by starting his own college, but then the juvenile humor, gross-out humor and drug abuse steps in. &lt;br /&gt;
|$36,323,505&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Aeon Flux''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-cloning film, but also pro-feminism as well.&lt;br /&gt;
|$25,874,337 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Antz''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|It's produced by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], downplays the military, and possesses an implicit promotion of Communism via the main character, but also has an Anti-Eugenics message too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$90,757,863&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Army of Darkness''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite its unrealistic depictions of demons, it's a pretty gun-centric pro-Second Amendment film.&lt;br /&gt;
|$11,502,976&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beauty and the Beast''&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|A young woman overcomes a shallow society and finds true love. Although by comparison a powerful and immensely popular antidote to [[feminism]] to the [[liberal]] movies churned out by [[Disney]] since, as well as overall promoting redemption (as seen with the Beast's transformation), and also promoting some family values (such as Belle being loyal to her father), there were a few hints at feminist propaganda at the beginning of the film, such as Belle being different from the villagers because she can read, which is implied to not be supported by the villagers at all (feminist propaganda often falsely claims that women couldn't get an education until the 1960s), as well as Belle being unwilling to hold the role of housewife for Gaston or raising children, and later her blaming the titular Beast for her fleeing the castle despite most of the events leading up to and after that event being largely her fault and the story framing that as being a good thing she did. Then-Disney Chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg also mentioned that he wanted &amp;quot;a feminist twist&amp;quot; on the original fairy tale by creating a heroine who is &amp;quot;a departure from typical Disney female characters&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.mcall.com/1991-11-22/features/2825583_1_beast-s-castle-fairy-tale-madame-gabrielle&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the feminist writer [[Linda Woolverton]] made clear that she made Belle a feminist and based her on the women's liberation movement from the 1970s in order to avoid creating another insipid princess.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Beauty and Maleficent&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url = http://time.com/2798136/maleficent-beauty-beast-writer/|title = The Same Woman Wrote Maleficent and Beauty and the Beast—Here’s How They’re Linked|date = May 30, 2014|accessdate = January 16, 2014|website = Time|publisher = |last = Rothman|first = Lily}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ew.com/article/2016/05/26/linda-woolverton-alice-belle-disney-heroines?xid=entertainment-weekly_socialflow_twitter&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gaston is a conservative and hardworking hunter who is considered by the villagers to be their town hero, but is shown to be the main villain of the movie (it should also be noted that in the original screenplay for the film, Gaston was intended to be a Marquess [French nobleman], meaning the decision to make him a conservative and hardworking hunter was made after a rewrite). In addition, although not to the same degree as other Disney films that came after it (i.e., ''The Hunchback of Notre Dame'' and ''The Princess and the Frog''), the film also has a slight anti-Christian bent, as the villagers (strongly implied by various verses in the opening song and the mob song, as well as a failed wedding, to be practicing and devout Christians) were later briefly seen supporting a plan that went against God's teachings, as well as overall depicted as being idiots, while Belle, the character framed as an intellectual and a moral figure, is not even seen or even implied to believe in God at all. In addition, Belle's love for Beast (where it is implied that she was largely unaware of the Beast being formerly a human prince) could be seen as promoting bestiality. Also, it is the first Disney movie to neither show nor hint at the two love interests getting married, and in fact, the only &amp;quot;wedding&amp;quot; in the film was the one Belle ruined, creating negative implications about marriage as a result, as well as starting a string of movies that don't paint marriage in a positive light. Similarly, the only three females in the film who are implicitly supportive of marriage and Christianity are demeaned, depicted as dumb blondes with the script and credits explicitly referring to them derogatorily as &amp;quot;the bimbettes.&amp;quot; There was also a slight anti-hunting sentiment in the film, due to the main villain, as aforementioned, explicitly being labelled as a hunter. There were also several overtones of a pro-homosexual agenda within the film, including the mob song late into the film, largely because of the executive producer, Howard Ashman, being gay and dying from AIDs at the time the film was made. One of the protagonistic characters, Lumiere, is briefly seen making out with a featherduster and was implied that the two weren't married, with some hints at Lumiere being an unrepentant womanizer. In addition, some elements of the film were later reused in the [[Essay:Worst Liberal Movies#Social|definitely liberal]] ''Maleficent'' movie.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Beauty and Maleficent&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$$218,967,620 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beauty and the Beast'' (2017 remake)&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|On the one hand, the 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' is the latest in the film trend of needlessly and shamelessly remaking animated films or children's stories for the sake of earning quick revenue in the dying Hollywood studio system. Liberals also seized the opportunity with the remake to exploit diversity within the ''Beauty and the Beast'' universe. The final result of the diversity inclusion is that it feels self-congratulatory in the sense of putting it in for the sake of having it, rather than having it be just a part of the story and the film. One notable example is the filmmakers' decision to make LeFou, Gaston's diminutive and bumbling sidekick, a homosexual who is conflicted with his feelings for Gaston. At the end of the film, LeFou is shown taking a romantic interest in a musketeer who is now a transgender woman after being transformed into one during Gaston's siege of the Beast's castle. Not only is it an atrocious artistic decision of the filmmakers to needlessly incorporate diversity simply for the sake of it, but the 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' also serves as an example that liberals can legitimately shoehorn the [[homosexual agenda]] into Disney films. Adding salt to the wound, the filmmakers also further changed history to suit their feminist agenda, similar to previous Disney films like ''Mulan'' (1998), ''Pocahontas'' (1995) and ''The Princess and the Frog'' (2009) (most infamously, the villagers are shown to be explicitly intolerant of Belle learning how to read and teaching girls to do the same, smashing her washing machine in the process, despite the fact that the namesake for the village in this film, Mdm. Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve, the original author for the fairy tale, was herself a woman). The 2017 film version of ''Beauty and the Beast'' is now even more of a feminist propaganda film than the 1991 animated film version ever was. There were also hints at an anti-war message due to Gaston being turned into a war veteran.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of that, along with the other shortcomings of the film, reinforces the statement that most of Hollywood is currently out of ideas for motion pictures. It also re-establishes the fact that Disney would, at times, forsake genuine family entertainment in favor of blatant liberal propaganda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, there were also several surprisingly Conservative messages in the film, significantly more than in the 1991 version. Namely, Christianity is treated in a far more positive light in this film than in the 1991 version as one of the few friends Belle has in this version is the village Chaplain named Pere Robert who is shown to be sympathetic to her bibliophilic nature and also attempts to prevent Maurice from being sent to the Asylum, and later is shown to be horrified at the formation of the mob against the Beast (it is to be noted that in the original 1991 film, the character in question was merely a bookseller, not a priest, and most of the villagers, implied to be devout Christians, were demonized in the film), which was also surprisingly accurate to history despite the aforementioned changing of history in the film (in real history, Christianity, especially the Catholic Church, actively encouraged literacy, writing, and arithmetic among both genders, with girls being taught in convents or at the home.). In addition, Maurice actually is shown to be more proactive in this film, such as directly refusing Gaston's attempt at marrying Belle and even attempting to expose Gaston as an attempted murderer and psychopath, and also plays a direct role in saving Belle and himself from the paddywagon after she exposes Beast to the villagers (in the original film, although he does set out to try and find Belle and save her after trying to get the villagers to help failed, he ultimately required saving by her due to catching an illness during his trek, and ultimately needed saving alongside Belle via Chip). In addition, Lumiere as well as the featherduster (named Plumette in this version) are shown to be an actual loving couple (in the original film, it is heavily implied that Lumiere was a frequent womanizer and that the featherduster was also sexually loose), and the remake also doesn't demonize traditional marriage nearly as much as in the 1991 version (notably, the remake cut out Gaston's wedding proposal as well as Belle shoving Gaston into mud in front of attendees). The forgiveness and redemption theme was also significantly more emphasized in the remake, due to Beast ultimately forgiving Maurice after learning why he had tried to steal the rose and even allowing Belle to save Maurice specifically to make up for his past behavior, with Maurice also forgiving Beast upon Belle showing him the baby rattle (originally, Maurice was a bit more hesitant to forgive the Beast). It is also shown to be significantly more pro-family as well, as not only is Belle shown to be loyal to her father like in the 1991 original, but as noted above, Maurice himself took measures to protect Belle and notably agreed with Belle that Gaston would not have worked out for her (originally, Maurice also thought Gaston was alright for her), and he also was shown to be very protective of Belle after his wife had died from the plague, with Belle's mom specifically sacrificing herself by telling them to leave her behind to allow Belle a healthy life. In addition, the triplets (renamed to &amp;quot;Village Lasses&amp;quot;) in the remake were depicted as having haughtiness, arrogance, being jealous of Belle, as well as overall being nasty people, including briefly smirking at Belle when she was locked up in the paddywagon as well as being actively involved in the arrest of Maurice as well as the later attack on Beast's castle (in the original film, the triplets were not shown to have any negative behavior to them besides their crushing on Gaston [not participating in the later arrest of Maurice, let alone the attack on Beast's castle shortly afterward during the climax, and also implying at one point that they were willing to give their blessing to Gaston marrying Belle when Belle refused him in the beginning of the film, and while they were present during the final lyrics for the Gaston reprise where Gaston explicitly divulged key details for his blackmail plan, the way it was framed could easily be interpreted as the triplets genuinely not knowing about the plan due to their absence from Maurice's arrival up to the scene where Gaston whispers the plan to LeFou.], and it is also heavily implied that they supported traditional marriage and were demeaned in the film by being referred to in the script as The Bimbettes and treated as dumb blondes for this reason). In addition, according to the film's director Bill Condon as well as one of the triplets' actresses, Rafaelle Cohen, the reason the triplets were intensely jealous and spiteful of Belle was because their mother neglected them while doting on Belle, showcasing the dangers of parental neglect.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas''&lt;br /&gt;
|1998&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Paints Christmas in a positive light, and has Beast learning the meaning behind it, as well as putting aside the past relating to it being the reason he was cursed. Also significantly tones down the more feminist messaging from the original film. However, the manner in which Christmas was depicted was closer to the secular view of Christmas than the actual intended meaning of the holiday being a celebration of Jesus Christ's birth.&lt;br /&gt;
|N/A (Direct to video movie)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Bee Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Its debatable whether or not its environmentalist or against it. It does show the destructiveness of environmentalism (i.e. butting into nature's problems in the name of helping her). The anti-human human sentiments in the movie turned out to be wrong, however, the humans are taking the honey made by the bees, similar to the welfare program of taking from those who worked for it. Others believe the movie promotes [[bestiality]], and is just disguised as a family movie. &lt;br /&gt;
|$287,600,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Campaign''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Political comedy depicts the Democrat candidate (Will Ferrell) as an obnoxious, drunken womanizer and satire of [[John Edwards]], although the Republican candidate (Zach Galifianakis) is portrayed just as negatively as a corrupt capitalist.&lt;br /&gt;
|$33,165,738&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Chicken Run''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Produced by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], this vegan propaganda film compares a chicken farm to the [[Holocaust]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynn_A73hcfs&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The main villain of the movie is a capitalist who wants to make chicken pies. On other hand the main villain of the movie is a feminist as well as she called her husband's ancestors &amp;quot;poor worthless nothings&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|$106,834,564&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Crow''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|The tagline claims that our hero is an angel, but he doesn't display any Christian values. However, there is an anti-drug scene were Eric Draven (the hero) makes a drug addict mother realize that her daughter needs her &amp;amp; gets her off drugs. On top of that the film's villains are nihilist anarchists. The film is notable for being Brandon Lee's last film, as an accident on the set killed him during production.&lt;br /&gt;
|$50,693,129&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ed Wood''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it does glorify cross dressing and the [[homosexual agenda]]. It still is pro-capitalism and the film also glorifies the American dream. As despite the obstacles Wood faces, he still continues doing what he loves in making movies.&lt;br /&gt;
|$5,887,457&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Edward Scissorhands''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Endorsed by the Christian website ChristianAnswers.net with a 4 out of 5 star rating. Conversely however, a prominently featured Christian character - the only character in the movie ever identified as Christian - is portrayed as fanatical and bigoted against people with scissors for hands.&lt;br /&gt;
|$56,362,352&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Falling Down''&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|R 	&lt;br /&gt;
|Film takes jabs at many [[liberal values]], [[illegal immigration]], union workers, multiculturalism, (one scene where Bill tells his ex-wife that the ice cream shop him and his family used to go to is now a Mexican store) and foreign aid (in one scene Bill asks an illegal Korean immigrate a rhetorical question on how much America has given his country and yells at him after he refuses to learn the language).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4tC4qfv92Q&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It's also one of the very few films to be truthful in the &amp;quot;Nazis were right wingers&amp;quot; myth perpetrated by liberals, in which Bill informs a Neo-Nazi that he's an American and the Nazi is a sick a-hole. As well as many shots where the America flag is trashed upon (which could symbolize how liberalism has trashed everything America has stood for).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=piPzExBdfIg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But at the same time it also takes jabs at capitalism, where Bill believes he's no longer commercially valuable. And although the plot is about man trying to reach his daughter's birthday party, the film seems to toy with its audience in suggesting whether he's mentally ill or not, as opposed to a pro-family message.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$40,903,593&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Fargo]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pregnant sheriff with traditional American family values solves an elaborate criminal embezzlement, kidnapping and murder scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
|$24,611,975	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Ghost''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The [[Bible]] claims ghosts don't exist. Still this film toys with idea that they do, also it has liberal actress Whoopi Goldberg as a psychic medium. Nevertheless, the film does show Christian values, as ghost Sam Wheat tries to uncover a bank fraud case, when he does convinces Goldberg to give the money to a Christian charity. It also has an anti-infidelity message, as despite being widowed, Sam's wife Molly still refuses to be with anyone else, even when his false friend Carl tries to hit on her. Also it isn't PC on [[Eternal damnation|damnation]], as the villains are seen being cared away helplessly by evil spirits after they die.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$217,631,306&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Good Kill''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Ethan Hawke plays a man who questions the ethics of his job as a drone pilot, while it is taking a jab at the [[Barack Obama]] regime (Obama has droned more people in the Middle East than George W. Bush, most of whom were innocent bystanders and the left has ignored it or claimed it was a &amp;quot;Fox News conspiracy&amp;quot;). It could also be against the War on Terror too.&lt;br /&gt;
|$316,472&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Grave of the Fireflies''&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|While the film has been labeled anti-war, the director Isao Takahata stated the actual meaning was about growing up. The film's message is still debatable to this day.&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Halloween III: Season of the Witch''&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Unlike the two films before it (which has mass murder Michael Myers) this film's villain is a pagan who plans on sacrificing children via witchcraft to bring back the original celebration of Halloween. However he does this by selling masks to them which many critics pointed out may have been an anti-capitalism message.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nytimes.com/1982/10/22/movies/haloween-iii-plotting-a-joke.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The film's &amp;quot;hero&amp;quot; is also an adulterer.&lt;br /&gt;
|$14,400,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hansel &amp;amp; Gretel: Witch Hunters''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Western fairy tale characters Hansel and Gretel are now adults and have their own private bounty hunting organization in hunting witches. Portrays witchcraft in a negative manner, and guns in good light. But the gore, graphic violence and brief nudity is rather unnecessary.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$55,703,475 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''High Noon''&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|A favorite of both Presidents [[Dwight Eisenhower]] and [[Bill Clinton]]; [[John Wayne]] said it was &amp;quot;the most un-American thing I've ever seen in my whole life&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brightlightsfilm.com/47/highnoon.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though susceptible of various interpretations, most of all it seems to scare people into wanting more government.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,750,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Hoot''&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|A movie about a bunch of kids who stand up to a CEO company that is trying to put one of its restaurants on a burrowing owl habitat. However the movie contains many morals, and promoting friendship. It does give kids the great inspiration to stand up for what they believe is right. &lt;br /&gt;
|$8,117,637&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Horrible Bosses 2''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Sequel to Horrible Bosses. Though this film could be argued to actually support the American Dream and capitalism, which its processor clearly did not.&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,445,357&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Hunger Games]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Futuristic totalitarians plan titular annual televised &amp;quot;games&amp;quot; as punishment on the descendants of failed revolutionaries from a past uprising. Although technically a message against totalitarianism and for individualism, Leftist actor Donald Sutherland, who played President Snow, implied that the struggles of the films' protagonists were supposed to be derived from the Occupy Wall Street movement, and the book's author also indicated that the events of the book were based on the George W. Bush administration.&lt;br /&gt;
|$406,267,858&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrayals an inside joke of [[same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]] by having [[Adam Sandler]] and Kevin James pretend to be a homosexual couple in order to receive benefits. The villains of the movies are government ranking officials out to prove with they are really homosexual. However contains some scenes of girls in lingerie and Adam Sandler checking out some girls. The film took place prior to the 2011 enactment of the Marriage Equality Act, which claimed to &amp;quot;legalize&amp;quot; &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot; for same-sex couples in the state. At the time the film was released, the state allowed for residents to file for unregistered cohabitation rights, and various municipal and county governments had offered domestic partnership registries.&lt;br /&gt;
|$120,059,556&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Although the film does depict the Communists as bad guys (to such an extent that the Russian Communist Party in Moscow was angered by the decision), and implies that Indiana Jones is a Republican or at the very least an [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] fan, the film also depicts McCarthyism in a negative light, with one character implying that the American Government was simply being paranoid and denies there being a sizeable Communist infiltration in America, and also seems to promote paganism in the form of the Crystal Skull.&lt;br /&gt;
|$786.6 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Iron Lady''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|The British biopic of [[Conservative Party]] leader and 1979-90 [[Prime Minister of the United Kingdom|British Prime Minister]], Margaret Thatcher, showing the effects of conservative economic policy on Britain, helping to lift the country out of its recession. However, it also showed Margaret Thatcher in a somewhat negative light, depicting her during her late years as becoming slightly addled.&lt;br /&gt;
|$80,554,188 (international including UK), $27,081,674 (US - domestic)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[It's a Wonderful Life]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|Falsely teaches that humanism is what makes life worthwhile; marginalizes [[faith]] with a cartoonish depiction and demonizes capitalism as sadistic and greedy.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,300,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jaws''&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-environmentalism film, the heroes are police chief Brody, WWII vet Quint and Marine Biologist Hooper who team up to take on a monstrous, man-eating great white shark. However, there is a part where (despite the warning) the Mayor keeps the beaches open for the sake of money, which some may say is an anti-capitalism statement. Notable for being one of the first summer blockbusters. It was followed by three sequels in 1978, 1983 and 1987.&lt;br /&gt;
|$260,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Juno''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A pregnant teenage woman rejects [[abortion]] and decides for an adoptive birth instead. This movie pushes [[feminism]] and marginalizes the essential role of fatherhood.&lt;br /&gt;
|$143,492,840&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Jurassic World''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Jurassic Park is now functioning and open for business and the new boss is a woman, an obvious feminist message. Also the military is downgraded as they plan to weaponize dinosaurs. Despite all this feminists weren't impressed and labeled it sexist&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/06/10/jurassic-world-a-big-dumb-sexist-mess.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and even liberal critics called the weaponizing dinosaurs plot asinine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://thoughtcatalog.com/olos-nah/2015/06/ill-just-say-what-everyone-is-thinking-jurassic-world-is-terrible/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|$652,270,625&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kiki's Delivery Service''&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The film does show the value of hard work and is pro-capitalism (Kiki owns her own delivery business), but at the same time depicts feminism and witchcraft in a positive light. &lt;br /&gt;
|$18 million&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingdom of Heaven'' (director's cut)&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A story set in the Crusades period about a young knight. While the theatrical version was a pure liberal media, the director's cut promotes fighting, honor, duty, and portrays the noble Knights Hospitallers in a positive light. That being said, the movie still portrays Knights Templars in a negative light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$47,398,413&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Kingsman: The Secret Service''&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-environmentalist, the villain attempts to eradicate the human race because of his belief in man-made global warming. Though the film is full of language and violence as well as a brief nudity scene. There's also one scene were one of the characters gets into a bloody fight with a group of Christians whom are portrayed as &amp;quot;racists&amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
|$128,261,724&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Knocked Up''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Unemployed, immature and childish 23-year old Ben Stone (Seth Rogen) has a one-night stand with serious career woman Alison Scott (Katherine Heigl), with the unintended consequence of pregnancy. Alison's mother (Joanna Kerns) says she should get the pregnancy &amp;quot;[[abortion|taken care of]]&amp;quot;, while Ben's best friend Jonah (Jonah Hill) suggests that &amp;quot;I won't say the A-word, but it rhymes with abortion.&amp;quot; Alison decides to keep the child, while Ben decides to find a real job, grow up, and become a father.&lt;br /&gt;
|$148,768,917&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The LEGO Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Anti-Large Government, with a message that anyone has the potential to be extraordinary. However is also anti-capitalist, and the main villain is Lord Business.&lt;br /&gt;
|$257,760,692 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Lincoln''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Bio film on conservative icon [[Abraham Lincoln]], played wonderfully by Daniel Day-Lewis. Although overall very positive towards Lincoln and the Republican Party, it nonetheless downplays the role the Democrat Party played in the institution of slavery during the Civil War.&lt;br /&gt;
|$182,207,973&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|''Lionheart''&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Pro-family as Jean-Claude Van Damme plays Lyon Gaultier (nicknamed Lionheart) who becomes a street fighter to help pay his sister-in-law's expenses after her husband is killed. During this time he also tries to reconnect with his estranged family. However he gets into the country illegally, which some could point out is a pro-illegal immigration statement. &lt;br /&gt;
|$24,078,196&lt;br /&gt;
|-  &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Lorax''&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it has an environmentalist agenda, it also states that monopolies are wrong.   &lt;br /&gt;
|$214,030,500 	&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''P.C.U.''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|College students fight back against a campus where the administration promotes official [[diversity]] awareness weekends and radical [[feminism]], [[vegan]]ism, and [[political correctness]] run amok, but a conservative group on campus is also portrayed just as negatively as the P.C. groups.&lt;br /&gt;
|$4,350,774&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Passion of the Christ]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Downplays the [[Resurrection]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original version of the film had no references at all to the Resurrection.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and strength of Christianity and omits powerful angels; instead exaggerates triumph of evil; film had little lasting effect on public or its producer; portrayed nails as through the hands rather than through the wrists as depicted by the [[Shroud of Turin]] and confirmed by modern science.&lt;br /&gt;
|$370,782,930&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pillow Talk''&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|UR&lt;br /&gt;
|A classic starring Rock Hudson and Doris Day in which conservative values triumph over liberal ones.  There are no distortions by feminist ideology.  Indeed, in one scene a leading man slaps the leading lady, but then is beaten up by dimwitted bystanders for it!&lt;br /&gt;
|$18,750,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Pulp Fiction''&lt;br /&gt;
|1994&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Despite saying the F-word in almost every sentence, the film (surprisingly) has a pro-Christian message as after being shot at, every bullet misses mob hit men Jules Winnfield and Vincent Vega. Winnfield believes it was a divine intervention and message from God to stop his life of crime. His partner doesn't believe this but it's later proven to be true as he perished later on in the movie. Also has sadomasochistic homosexuals as the bad guys. And (sort of) has an anti-drug message as mob boss's girlfriend Mia Wallace is seen also overdosing (a negative side to drugs) on heroin.&lt;br /&gt;
|$107,928,762 &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|''The Rescuers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The villain in this movie is a capitalist pawn shop owner, who wants a rare diamond to make her rich, to add insult to injury they're Southerners. Also paints the United Nations in a positive light. On the other hand, the main villain is also a feminist, and the main human protagonist is shown praying for not only herself (even she has been kidnapped) but for all the kids in the orphanage (who have not been kidnapped). This is one of the rare Disney films feature a [[Christian]] character that's treated in a positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$29 million  	&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Robin Hood''&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|Animated Disney adaptation of the iconic story, depicting all of the characters as anthropomorphic animals. Although the story itself was based on [[Joseph Ritson]]'s revised version of the character that was in support of the Jacobin cause and thus was a liberal icon (steals from the rich, gives to the poor), the villain is Prince John who makes his money from taxes, suggesting Robin Hood is only giving money the government demanded back to people who actually worked for it. It also features a condemnation of government encroachment of the church, as a pivotal scene featured the Sheriff of Nottingham explicitly stealing a coin from the poor box and his later arresting Friar Tuck for trying to stop him, and the Sheriff's actions were clearly being framed in a horrible light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32 million &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Rogue One: A Star Wars Story]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A group of freedom fighters undertake a dangerous mission in an attempt to steal the plans for the Galactic Empire's ultimate weapon, the Death Star. Unlike the previous Star Wars films, the focus of this one is on soldiers on the battlefield, their goal to restore liberty to the Galaxy. This gives the movie a strong feeling of American patriotism, and could also be argued to show respect to the U.S. military. However, the screenwriters Chris Weitz and Gary Whitta made tweets that implied that they were trying to push the leftist Diversity agenda just after Trump won the presidency, as well as used a customized version of the Rebel Starbird logo with a safety pin attached, and one of the main characters, Saw Gerrera, was stated to be based on Marxist revolutionary [[Che Guevara]] and was treated in a (comparably) positive light.&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,043,133,586&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Saw''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004-2010, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
|R (Director's Cuts are NC-17)&lt;br /&gt;
|The franchise contains an anti-nihilist message, with the antagonist, John Kramer, also known as &amp;quot;the Jigsaw Killer,&amp;quot; wishing for his victims to survive the &amp;quot;games&amp;quot; in which he places them, ultimately emerging with a better appreciation for their lives. ''Saw IV'' also contains a very strong message of letting go and letting people find salvation and redemption for themselves, an allusion to biblical passages about the subject. However, it could also be argued that Jigsaw is playing God with the value of human life, by bringing his test subjects to the very edge of death, forcing them to gravely hurt themselves, in order to survive. Furthermore, in ''Saw III'', one of his apprentices, Amanda Young, is revealed to have rigged traps to kill her victims, even if they successfully complete their games, as she no longer believes in Jigsaw's philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
|$953,421,276&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Shame''&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|NC-17&lt;br /&gt;
|While the movie shows [[Hollywood Values]], such as sex addiction, in a negative light and is clearly anti-[[homosexual agenda]], as the main character reaches his lowest point by partaking in such acts, the film is graphic in its nature leaving one to question how conservative it really is.&lt;br /&gt;
|$3,909,002 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[The Simpsons]] Movie''&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Portrays the liberal [[Environmental Protection Agency|EPA]] as a villainous and devious agency, and portrays the Government in general as intrusive and corrupt. On the other hand, it also promotes [[environmentalism]] in the beginning.&lt;br /&gt;
|$183,135,014&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Soul Man''&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|A white student cheats the [[affirmative action]] system, by pretending to be black in order to get the scholarship he needs for to pay for Harvard. Towards the end it is revealed he took the scholarship away from someone who needed it (and is really black), because she has a son and is divorced at such a young age. Exploits the racism that people have against white people. But on the positive note the film teaches the importance of hard work. &lt;br /&gt;
|$27,820,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Star Wars]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1977-1983 (Original Trilogy); 1999-2005 (Prequel Trilogy); 2015- (Sequel Trilogy)&lt;br /&gt;
|PG, PG-13 (Episode III &amp;amp; Episode VII)&lt;br /&gt;
|Mostly composed of simple truths about the triumph of good over evil, and in the case of ''Episode VI: Return of the Jedi'', redemption. However, ''Episode VI'' also contained some implied pro-[[Vietcong]] propaganda at George Lucas' behest via the Ewoks, as well as his later claiming that the entirety of the ''Star Wars'' saga from ''Episodes IV''-''VI'' was meant to be his means of protesting Vietnam (which is supported by a memo dating back to 1973 where he claimed the film was about &amp;quot;A large technological empire going after a small group of freedom fighters.&amp;quot; It is also to be noted that this was not the first time he voiced support for the Vietcong as well as used film to push an anti-American/anti-War agenda, as he also initially played a role in the filming of ''Apocalypse Now''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nypost.com/2014/09/21/how-star-wars-was-secretly-george-lucas-protest-of-vietnam/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), and the re-release for ''Episode IV: A New Hope'' also had an infamous edit where it made it seem as though Greedo shot at Han first, with George Lucas later revealing he did the edit (or rather, falsely claimed it was always that way) as a means to promote gun control. The prequel trilogy also had some implied pot-shots at then-president George W. Bush and his War on Terror, and there was also an implied promotion of moral relativity in ''Revenge of the Sith'' (where Obi-Wan, when confronting Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader in the climax, stated in reply to Anakin's declaration that Obi-Wan is his enemy if he's not with him that &amp;quot;only a Sith deals in absolutes.&amp;quot;). A similar promotion of moral relativity and postmodernism was shown in ''Return of the Jedi'' where Obi-Wan admitted that his claim that Vader killed Anakin Skywalker was &amp;quot;true from a certain point of view.&amp;quot; In addition, the Trade Federation and its motives in ''The Phantom Menace'' was crafted by George Lucas to be a negative response to the Republican Revolution of 1994, and in particular Newt Gingrich's Contract with America (with Gingrich himself being a partial namesake of the main villain, Viceroy Nute Gunray). In addition, the director for ''Episode VII: The Force Awakens'', [[J.J. Abrams]], admitted in a press release that he deliberately made Finn black in order to ensure diversity among the characters, hinting at it pushing the leftist [[diversity]] agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnet.com/news/director-j-j-abrams-weighs-in-on-diversity-in-the-star-wars-universe/?_escaped_fragment_=#!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Two audience members jointly asked Abrams whether -- given his track record of helping build a diverse cast as director of the &amp;quot;Star Trek&amp;quot; reboot films -- he could confirm if there will be more Asian characters in the Star Wars universe. Asian characters are few and far between in the Star Wars franchise -- one appears in the original trilogy's last film, ''Return of the Jedi'', but for only four seconds before dying in a fiery explosion. Abrams said that while he won't be casting future films in the franchise, because he's directing only ''Episode VII'', he did include Asian characters in ''The Force Awakens'', which opened December 18. &amp;quot;I think it's important people see themselves represented in film,&amp;quot; Abrams said. &amp;quot;I think it's not a small thing.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, the film also hints at a militant [[feminist]] agenda by having Leia act as general and Rey not allowing anyone to save her, something that conservative commentator John Nolte mentioned was a detraction for the film.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/12/17/star-wars-the-force-awakens-review-j-j-abrams-repents-for-the-sins-of-george-lucas/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, the ending award ceremony in ''A New Hope'' was deliberately modeled after the stadium scene from the infamous Nazi movie propaganda ''The Triumph of the Will''.&lt;br /&gt;
|$460,998,007&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Starship Troopers''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Although it overall depicts the Military in a protagonistic light and arguably is pro-war and pro-military, the director of the film, Paul Verhoeven, implied it was actually supposed to push an anti-military, anti-war message where it implied that America during the Cold War were automatically fascists simply because they are entering war, and specifically stated it was &amp;quot;a natural evolution for post-World War II America.&amp;quot; In addition, to reinforce Verhoeven's message, he deliberately modeled various scenes after ''Triumph of the Will'' and other pro-Nazi propaganda scenes, as well as modeled the protagonists' uniforms after the uniforms utilized by the Nazis (i.e., the character Carl, played by Neil Patrick Harris, wearing a uniform that was modeled after the [[SS]]). When asked by Michael Ironside, who was one of the people who had a role in the movie and had read the original book, about why he made the movie despite Verhoeven's leftist politics, he answered &amp;quot;If I tell the world that a right-wing, fascist way of doing things doesn't work, no one will listen to me. So I'm going to make a perfect fascist world: everyone is beautiful, everything is shiny, everything has big guns and fancy ships, but it's only good for killing ******* bugs!&amp;quot; (note that fascism is not &amp;quot;right wing&amp;quot;, it is left wing, so Verhoeven's incorrect regarding which wing the Nazis/fascists were part of).&lt;br /&gt;
|$54,814,377 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Sudden Death''&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Disgraced fire fighter now becomes a laughingstock fire marshal uncovers an terrorist plot at a Hockey game plans to redeem himself and protect his children and the Vice President from said terrorists. However they're not Islamic, which may have been because the film was trying to be politically correct.&lt;br /&gt;
|$20,350,171 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Super''&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|Main character becomes a super hero after a vision from God. He also frequently turns to prayer and a Christian television show for guidance. Even though his wife leaves him for a drug dealer, he remains loyal to her for the whole movie. Although contains foul language, violence, and brief nudity scenes.&lt;br /&gt;
|$327,716 	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Team America: World Police''&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|While it is clearly pro-military, pro-America, and anti-Hollywood, the movie is riddled with liberal values, including toilet humor and vulgar language throughout.  Also, in the movie's foul mouthed theme song, it favors abortion, slavery, pornography, and Democrats, while having no positive reaction to Republicans. Penned by the creators of ''[[South Park]]'' and ''The Book of Mormon'' musical.&lt;br /&gt;
|$32,786,074&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Titanic]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Every life had value and the most powerful men gave up their seats on lifeboats to women and children first; the media and a young [[RINO]] are rightly criticized; broke the record in movie revenues. However, it also gave some hints at a pro-socialist view, and a key scene involving Rose being drawn in the nude is invocative of pornography.&lt;br /&gt;
|$600,779,824&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''[[Trainspotting]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|It's been debatable if the film is anti-drug.&lt;br /&gt;
|$16,491,080&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''U-571''&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Had a plot which was based on the first capture of a [[German]] [[Enigma machine]] in [[World War Two]]. Despite the film being patriotic to America, the facts are wrong as the Enigma machine was captured by the [[British]] in 1941 prior to the Americans entering the war. &lt;br /&gt;
|$77,122,415&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Twilight Saga''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008-2012&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Starred by anti-military liberal [[Kristen Stewart]] and glorifies [[vampire|vampires]], but it also makes fun of [[public school culture]] and [[modernism]] while promoting [[abstinence]] until marriage, traditional courtship and marriage, and the [[pro-life]] movement. It was written by a [[Mormon]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$1,365,922,346&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ''Van Helsing'' &lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|PG-13&lt;br /&gt;
|Thanks to [[Hollywood values]], Van Helsing isn't portrayed as the Christian character he should be, but the film still gets its good vs. evil message across. As well as portraying the Catholic church in a positive light. The director Stephen Sommers has made conservative films ''The Mummy Returns'' and ''G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra'' though.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Wall-E''&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|G&lt;br /&gt;
|The movie warned against big government (BNL), however it is also anti-capitalist and pro environmentalism as BNL is a corporation.&lt;br /&gt;
|$223,808,164 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''The Way We Were''&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|Unique in the way that it appears liberal to liberals while unintentionally sending a [[conservative]] message to young women. Stars uber-liberal [[Barbra Streisand]].&lt;br /&gt;
|$49,919,870&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''We're the Millers''&lt;br /&gt;
|2013&lt;br /&gt;
|R&lt;br /&gt;
|A drug dealer, stripper, runaway, and average loser pretend to be a family to sneak marijuana out of Mexico. However they learn the value and importance of family. The villains of the movie are all drug gang men, the film also features a stripper scene, and whether or not the film is anti-drug in the end is debatable.&lt;br /&gt;
|$150,394,119&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|''Yours Mine and Ours''&lt;br /&gt;
|2005&lt;br /&gt;
|PG&lt;br /&gt;
|The film is about a widower father of a conservative family who marries a widowed mother of a liberal family. Their two difference lifestyles contradict with each other, and the film does not really pick a side of on whose lifestyle is better. However it does have a scene where the liberal kids outsmart the conservative kids (By tricking them into thinking there is a fire, and then getting to use the bathrooms to themselves). Also has a scene where the kids work together and use conservative tactics to end bullying without the help of an authority figure. In the end the kids learn to put their differences aside and realize that family is what matters more.&lt;br /&gt;
|$53,412,862&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please add more!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Worst Liberal TV Shows]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Cinema]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worst Liberal Movies]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Worst Liberal Movies}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drubg</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>