<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Drcody</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Drcody"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Drcody"/>
	<updated>2026-11-12T05:59:57Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Chemistry&amp;diff=292267</id>
		<title>Talk:Chemistry</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Chemistry&amp;diff=292267"/>
		<updated>2007-09-13T03:29:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Drcody: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;There are MANY more branches other than organic, physical, and &amp;quot;general&amp;quot;, which isn't even a field of chemistry.  It appears that someone opened up a college course book and picked the only courses that contained one adjective.  What about inorganic chemistry (which deserves the definition given to general), analytical chemistry, or biochemistry.  Also, physical is not a sub group, subgroups are ones such as bioanalytical chemistry or physical organic or physical inorganic etc.  PLEASE someone do this article justice.  {{unsigned|DrCody}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Perhaps you could have a go at it?  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:58, 5 July 2007 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would love to!&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Drcody</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>