<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Derekjosh</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Derekjosh"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Derekjosh"/>
	<updated>2026-10-06T16:33:48Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fox_News&amp;diff=20407</id>
		<title>Talk:Fox News</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Fox_News&amp;diff=20407"/>
		<updated>2007-03-08T03:26:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Derekjosh: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Is a citation ''from'' Fox News saying that Fox News is fair and balanced really a good idea?&lt;br /&gt;
I would think that it would be more appropriately said as &amp;quot;Fox News claims to be fair and balanced,&amp;quot; or something along those lines.&lt;br /&gt;
Anyone disagree?&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 15:23, 7 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*I disagree. One of the ways Fox News attempts to be fair and balanced is by inviting guests from both sides of the issue. Personally I would prefer to only hear from conservatives, but Fox News has both sides. Hannity and Colmes is a great example of a Fair and Balanced show - Sean is the Conservative and Alan is the liberal (and proud of it). [[User:Crocoite|Dean]] 17:28, 7 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
I think this entire article could use an overhaul.  Although I am a supporter of Fox News, the bias in this article in very apparent.  --[[User:David R|&amp;amp;lt;&amp;amp;lt;-David R-&amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;gt;]] 15:25, 7 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*I disagree.  If there's any bias in this article, it's toward conservatism and the Truth, which was the whole purpose of Conservapedia in the first place!  --[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 16:44, 7 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:*Well it does have a very obvious bias.  You are right in saying that Conservapedia has a point of view to impose.  But the srticle goes beyond the point of view of Conservapedia.  &lt;br /&gt;
:Take this example from the article: &amp;quot;Fox News is best because instead of just telling you what to think, they only report the news unbiased and then allow the viewer to decide.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
:#Even though I may think it is a fact that Fox News is the best, it is merely my opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
:#This sentence and others are worded as if they were written by a 1st grader - read after comma to see what I mean.&lt;br /&gt;
:The point is the article must be written over again to present a factual, encyclopedia-worthy article.  --[[User:David R|&amp;amp;lt;&amp;amp;lt;-David R-&amp;amp;gt;&amp;amp;gt;]] 16:56, 7 March 2007 (EST) &lt;br /&gt;
**If one news source tells you what to think (as any of the leftist mainstream media stations do) and another just reports the facts in a fair and unbiased manner, then clearly the second news source is superior, by definition! --[[User:Ashens|Ashens]] 17:00, 7 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
***Every source has a bias.  Fox News is no exception.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True.  Didn't even notice the &amp;quot;Sean Hannity is a great American&amp;quot; statement at first, which I think is safe to say is an opinion.  Also, the reference points to an outdated car giveaway. Doesn't seem like it belongs.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Commodore Guff|Commodore Guff]] 15:42, 7 March 2007 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the link for the first reference needs to be changed.  It is used as a citation for Fox News saying it is Fair and Balanced, but the link only goes to a page with employment opportunities.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Derekjosh</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>