<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Dbd047</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Dbd047"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Dbd047"/>
	<updated>2026-11-12T21:53:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Same-sex_marriage&amp;diff=202777</id>
		<title>Same-sex marriage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Same-sex_marriage&amp;diff=202777"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T05:01:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dbd047: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;''', also referred to as [[homosexuality|gay]] marriage or [[homosexuality|homosexual]] marriage, is the official certification in jurisdictions that allow a union between two people of the same sex. Social conservatives regard it as immoral, and argue that use of the word &amp;quot;[[marriage]]&amp;quot; is a misnomer, because the [[Form of Solemnization of Matrimony|marriage services]] of Christian denominations define marriage as the union of a man and a woman,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;E.g. &amp;quot;Dearly beloved: We have come together in the presence of God to witness and bless the joining together of this man and this woman in Holy Matrimony.&amp;quot; ''The Book of Common Prayer,'' Episcopal Church, The Church Hymnal Corporation and the Seabury Press, 1979: &amp;quot;The Celebration and Blessing of a Marriage,&amp;quot; p. 423&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a definition which was also written into United States federal law in 1996.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. James Dobson's [[Focus on the Family]] refers to the phrase ''same-sex 'marriage,''' with quotation marks around the word ''marriage,'' to call attention to the fact that marriage&amp;amp;mdash;civil as well as religious&amp;amp;mdash;is intrinsically a union between a man and a woman, and that therefore same-sex unions are &amp;quot;counterfeits.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.family.org/socialissues/A000000464.cfm Same-Sex 'Marriage' and Civil Unions], ''Focus on the Family's'' website&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Abuse of the term was unheard of a few decades ago, however these unions are now among a number of issues advocated by [[gay rights]] activists.  In the United States, marriage is primarily governed by each individual state and marriage laws differ from state to state. Several states allow &amp;quot;civil unions&amp;quot; between two people of the same sex, and one, Massachusetts, currently allows it under the name &amp;quot;marriage.&amp;quot; These marriages are not recognized by the Federal government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background ==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1996 Congress recognized the likelihood that gay rights advocates would soon seek changes in some states. It was concerned about the possibility of test cases reaching the Supreme Court, and of the court conceivably ruling that a state&amp;amp;mdash;even though it prohibits gay marriage itself&amp;amp;mdash;must honor gay marriages performed in another state. The Defense of Marriage act, which was passed and signed by President Clinton, prevents this possibility, and also prevents the Federal Government from recognizing marriage as anything other than a union between a man and a woman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 a Vermont court ruled that under its constitution, it was not required to allow &amp;quot;same-sex marriage&amp;quot; but was required to make provisions to grant same-sex couples legal rights identical to those provided by marriage. Vermont responded by creating &amp;quot;civil unions,&amp;quot; which are legally distinct from marriages but convey the same rights. As of 2007, California, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Maine also provide civil unions or domestic partnerships. Beginning in 2008, the states of Washington, Oregon, and New Hampshire will also provide same-sex unions.  Hawaii provides certain benefits to same sex couples.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/connecticut/ny-bc-ct--civilunions-optio0531may31,0,341613.story?coll=ny-region-apconnecticut Newsday]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 2003 the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that under Massachusetts' constitution, same-sex couples could not be denied Massachusetts marriage licenses, making Massachusetts the sole state to issue same-sex marriage licenses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Because of an established Massachusetts law, Massachusetts same-sex marriages are all-but-limited to Massachusetts residents. The law says that an out-of-state couple cannot be married if their marriage would not be recognized in their home state. The same-sex marriages are not recognized under federal law or in most other states.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The religious ceremony of marriage is governed by each denomination and is unaffected by laws passed by civil authority. Same-sex marriage is forbidden in Orthodox Judaism, Catholicism, and most mainstream Protestant denominations. Thus, even in Massachusetts, it would be close to impossible for a same-sex couple to find a Catholic priest willing to marry them in a church, or an Orthodox rabbi willing to marry them in a temple.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Public attitude toward same-sex marriage parallels attitude toward homosexuality. In general, it is opposed by social conservatives and outside of this group, support is split down the middle leaning to opposition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Relationships/same_sex_marriage_poll_040121.html Same Sex Marriage Poll from ABC News]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Issues ==&lt;br /&gt;
James Dobson of ''Focus on the Family'' suggests that the motivation of those advocating same-sex marriage is not to secure the benefits of marriage for gay couples, but to destroy the institution of marriage itself. Such claims may be taken as a sign of Dobson's slow decline into insanity:&lt;br /&gt;
:...most gays and lesbians do not want to marry each other. That would entangle them in all sorts of legal constraints. Who needs a lifetime commitment to one person? The intention here is to destroy marriage altogether. With marriage as we know it gone, everyone would enjoy all the legal benefits of marriage (custody rights, tax-free inheritance, joint ownership of property, health care and spousal citizenship, etc.,) without limiting the number of partners or their gender. Nor would &amp;quot;couples&amp;quot; be bound to each other in the eyes of the law. This is clearly where the movement is headed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.focusonthefamily.com/docstudy/newsletters/A000000771.cfm Marriage on the Ropes], Dr. James Dobson, retrieved from ''Focus on the Family'', 15 May 2007. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Reference==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Law|Same-Sex marriage]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dbd047</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminism&amp;diff=202774</id>
		<title>Feminism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Feminism&amp;diff=202774"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T04:59:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dbd047: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Feminism is a philosophy which argues for equal treatment and responsibilities for men and women, and boys and girls.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roots of the movement in the United States and the United Kingdom include the [[Women's Suffrage]] movement of the early 1900's and the [[Women's Liberation]] (or &amp;quot;Second Wave Feminist&amp;quot;) movement of the 1960's and 1970's.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An [[Equal Rights Amendment]] was proposed in the US in 1972, but was not ratified. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The feminist movement in the West evolved in the 1980s with the rise of [[Post-Feminism]] which stresses that women have many rights that go unrecognized in everyday life, often by women themselves, and in the American legal structure. Most members of the feminist movement support reproductive rights currently enshrined in American law, including the legal right to [[abortion]]. This stance is opposed by many conservatives, moron [[Rush Limbaugh]] to coin the term &amp;quot;Femi-nazis&amp;quot; to refer to feminist supporters of abortion rights. As of April 2007, women in the US have a legal right to abortion, without any significant limitation. According to a recent poll, 16% of the American public favor abortion being legal in all cases, and 39% favor abortion being legal in most cases. 31% feel that abortion should be illegal in most cases and 12% believe it should be illegal in all cases. 2% are unsure on the issue. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.pollingreport.com/abortion.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Second Wave Feminism has made a resurgence in 1990s and early years of 21st century as the movement is spreading internationally in [[Asia]] and the [[Middle East]].  During the administration of [[Bill Clinton]] these latter-day feminists overlooked President Clinton's apparently womanizing behavior in order to focus upon his attempts to procure federal funding for several of their causes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Gender equality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.feministezine.com/feminist/ The Feminist eZine] Archive of articles about Feminist History.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cia-on-campus.org/surveil/steinem.html Gloria Steinem and the CIA], ''The New York Times'', February 21, 1967.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/msg02217.html Inside the CIA with Gloria Steinem], Nancy Borman,  ''The Village Voice''.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dbd047</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=BCE&amp;diff=202763</id>
		<title>BCE</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=BCE&amp;diff=202763"/>
		<updated>2007-06-20T04:52:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Dbd047: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;BCE is the abbreviated form of the term &amp;quot;Before [[Common Era]]&amp;quot;, a historical equivalent of BC, or &amp;quot;Before Christ&amp;quot;.  Some politicians have argued that the use of BCE implies some sort of anti-Christian bias, claims not based in reality.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Dbd047</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>