<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Darth+Umbris</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Darth+Umbris"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Darth_Umbris"/>
	<updated>2026-10-09T00:22:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Political_spectrum&amp;diff=1718580</id>
		<title>Political spectrum</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Political_spectrum&amp;diff=1718580"/>
		<updated>2021-01-05T00:19:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Darth Umbris: Grammar correction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The idea of a '''political spectrum''' stems from deliberative bodies in which groups of like-minded men would sit on opposite sides of a chamber, which gave rise to terms like &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; being attached to the views of the men on those sides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The earliest known left-right classification was that of the [[National Assembly]] in [[France]] just before the [[French Revolution]].  Members who supported the monarchy would sit towards the right. Those who had been offended by their own party would frequently stand up and walk over to the other side of the hall in order to make a political statement.  &lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Govt placement chart.png|thumb|250px|Alternative political spectrum chart, based on the degree of power government wields over the individual.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Historian [[Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.]] has said the spectrum theory was &amp;quot;adequate to the political simplicities of the nineteenth century, when the Right meant those who wished to preserve the existing order and the Left meant those who wished to change it. But the twentieth century, here as elsewhere, introduced new ambiguities.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/50s/schlesinger-notrightleft.html Not Right, Not Left, But a Vital Center], [[Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.]], ''New York Times Magazine'', April 4, 1948.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In modern times, the left emphasizes [[collectivism|collective]] wisdom as a guiding force (see [[planned economy]]), while the right emphasizes individual rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is in stark contrast to the erroneous liberal (and Communist) view which associates the &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; with Fascism and the &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; with Communism:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*The rise of fascism and communism illustrated vividly the fallacies of the linear conception of Right and Left. In certain basic respects – a totalitarian state structure, a [[single party]], a leader, a secret police, a hatred of political, cultural and intellectual freedom – fascism and communism are clearly more like each other than they are like anything in between.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/50s/schlesinger-notrightleft.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Definitions==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original definition referred to Church and state issues from the late 18th century Enlightenment period. At its root was faith vs. rationalism, or the Church vs. [[secularism]]. The so-called &amp;quot;right&amp;quot;, defined as &amp;quot;traditional interests&amp;quot; referred to the Church &amp;amp; monarchy who ruled by the [[divine right of kings]], and the so-called &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; constituted secular elements challenging the Church's long-held influence over civil government.  These definitions have always been problematic when attempting to assign western notions of &amp;quot;left and right&amp;quot; to societies which traditionally have no conception of separation of church and states, such as in Islam in Muslim countries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nobsopus.blogspot.com/1993/11/political-career-of-muhammad.html The Political Career of Muhammad], Arnold Toynbee, ''A Study of History'' Annex II TO III. C. (ii) (b) p. 466.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or Czarist Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The monarchy and titled nobility became known as the &amp;quot;right&amp;quot;; this idea, however, has been disabused in the United States where a landlord class of titled nobles never existed, and, in fact, is specifically prohibited by the U.S. Constitution.  Hence Europeans today, based upon their own cultural idioms and history, have an extremely discolored view of what the &amp;quot;American right&amp;quot; is.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another common misperception is, while the &amp;quot;right&amp;quot; has become identified with defending and advocating [[Judeo-Christian]] values, [[secular]] [[atheist]] mass movements such as [[National Socialism]] are often either mistakenly or deliberately labeled as [[right-wing]]. This fallacy has been particularly well illustrated in our own time by examining the modern [[fascist]] [[Ba'athist]] [[regime]]s of [[Iraq]] and [[Syria]]. Both have their roots in the anti-clerical influences of Western [[socialism]] against fundamentalist [[Islam]], and inherently promote &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; against oppressive religious [[theocracy]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ozconservative.com/whatisconsshort.htm What is conservatism?] Mark Richardson&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;left&amp;quot; is often described as advocating &amp;quot;change&amp;quot; of traditional systems and institutions of a society, however the leftist regimes of [[Cuba]] and [[North Korea]] stoutly resist changes other leftist regimes abandoned 20 years ago after seven decades of stagnation and exploitation of the oppressed common people by a privileged leftist ruling elite.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the left may challenge the authority, legitimacy and even existence of a supreme power, the right is beholden to traditional faith-based cultural attitudes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many do not realize the term &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; was hijacked and redefined as a cover for socialists. Traditional &amp;quot;liberal,&amp;quot; what we today call &amp;quot;classical liberal&amp;quot; is the same as modern conservatives. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===European conceptions vs American conceptions===&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia and many historians also use the terms &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;left-wing&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;right-wing&amp;quot; both interchangeably and intercontinentally and they combine Europe's political spectrum with America's political spectrum which is why it's also believed by many that Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers' Party were right-wing and why they're commonly placed on the American right when the fact is that they're center-left. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to popular belief, however, the National Socialist German Workers' Party does not qualify as right-wing under even the European definition, as the European definition of right-wing entails adherence to and loyalty toward the monarchy, and the Nazis were strongly anti-monarchist, refusing to restore Germany's monarchistic system, and late in World War II even tried to overthrow the monarchy of one of their fellow Axis countries, Hungary. Furthermore, by European standards, the Nazis certainly were not loyal to any church or belief system in the Judeo-Christian God or Abrahamic religions. Nazis were atheist (or at most pagan) revolutionaries and socialists through and through, albeit a parochial socialism and &amp;quot;classless society&amp;quot; based on national origin. Former President Barack Obama is considered among many Europeans the most conservative or right-wing president America has ever had.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Origins==&lt;br /&gt;
At the time of the [[French Revolution]], when the existing order, or ''[[Ancien Regime]]'' had been overthrown, the idea of [[nationalism]] did not exist throughout most of [[Europe]].  During the violent years of 1793 and 1794 in France, a love of the ''Patrie'', or the nation, was cultivated to replace the foundations upon which [[society]] had been built under the old order.  Under the stimulus of this movement for national unification, Catholicism was faced with the competition of a worship of national patriotism.  [[Nationalism]] grew out of this new will to construct and shape the political community.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Hall Stewart, ''A Documentary Survey of the French Revolution'' (Macmillan, New York, 1963).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David A. Bell, ''The Cult of the Nation in France: Inventing Nationalism, 1680-1800'', (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001). [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2005/is_1_37/ai_109668489]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This transmutation of a love of God to a love of &amp;quot;the people&amp;quot; as being the basis for a social and political order spread across Europe and other parts of the world during the nineteenth century.  In Germany it became a recognition and consciousness of &amp;quot;''das volk''&amp;quot;, later in Russia it was a dedication to the &amp;quot;''narodny''&amp;quot;.  By the mid-nineteenth century, Socialism as a doctrine sought to overthrow the existing order of society, the Church and aristocracy, by promoting atheism and nationalism.  The basic tenet was to replace the individual's commitment to love and serve God with the individual's commitment to love and serve the collective society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism has always been [[authoritarian]] from its beginnings. It began as a reaction against the [[classical liberalism]] of the French Revolution. The French writers who laid its foundation had no doubt that their ideas could be put into practice only by a strong dictatorial government. The first of modern planners, [[Henri de Saint-Simon]], predicted those who did not obey his proposed [[economic planning]] boards would be ‘treated as cattle.’ &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iea.org.uk/files/upld-publication43pdf?.pdf ''Road to Serfdom'',] Friedrich A. Hayek, Reader's Digest Condensed Version, April 1945, pg. 39.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nationalism can be defined as pride in one's native language and culture.  Socialist theoreticians, wanting to overthrow the existing order, stirred up nationalist resentment among the minorities within the larger German, Russian, and Austro-Hungarian Empires. The reaction among Austrian Socialists was quite different. A solution to the problem of nationalities became policy in Austria-Hungary on two levels: territorial autonomy for territorial minorities, and &amp;quot;personal autonomy&amp;quot; for members of minorities dispersed among peoples of different languages and cultures.  Minorities were to be granted the right to have their own schools and their own institutions. Many minorities realized it was better to remain subjects of the supra-national Hapsburg state than to be subordinate to repressive policies and actions of other national groups. Austrian Socialists rejected the idea of [[national liberation movement]]s and the dissolution of the Hapsburg Monarchy into independent national units.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;talmon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;J. L. Talmon, ''The Unique and the Universal'', Secker &amp;amp; Warburg, London 1965.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the twentieth century, [[V.I. Lenin]] insisted on the right of subjugated peoples to break away from the great empires. Once the [[Bolsheviks]] were in power in Russia however, any attempt on the part of  the subjugated peoples to break away from the Socialist Union of nations was considered [[counter-revolutionary]] activity.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;talmon&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Friedrich Hayek]] of the London School of Economics and Political Science writing in the Spring of 1933 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Friedrich A. Hayek, ''Memorandum on Nazi-Socialism spring of 1933''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
remarked,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Nothing could be more superficial than to consider the forces which dominate the Germany of today as reactionary — in the sense that they want a return to the social and economic order of 1914. The persecution of the Marxists, and of democrats in general, tends to obscure the fundamental fact that National Socialism is a genuine socialist movement, whose leading ideas are the final fruit of the antiliberal tendencies which have been steadily gaining ground in Germany since the later part of the Bismarckian era, and which led the majority of the German intelligentsia first to &amp;quot;socialism of the chair&amp;quot; and later to Marxism in its social-democratic or communist form.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://chronicle.com/weekly/v53/i30/30b00401.htm 'The Road to Serfdom'],  The Chronicle of Higher Education, ''The Chronicle Review'', Volume 53, Issue 30, Page B4, March 30, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternatives==&lt;br /&gt;
The left/right scale is a misleading way of comparing political systems. People use the left/right approach out of habit, but it leads to confusion. For example, [[fascism]] is often placed on the right and [[socialism]] on the left even though fascism and socialism have more similarities with each other than anything that falls between them. Indeed, the left/right scale is an obsolete reference to the seating arrangement of the French Assembly in the 1790s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.lairdwilcox.com/news/nolanchart.html Beyond Left/Right] by [http://www.theadvocates.org/celebrities/marshall-fritz.html Marshall Fritz], 1987.  Retrieved from lairdwilcox.com 05/25/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 1970, Denver advertising executive David Nolan invented the Nolan Chart to overcome the inherently illogical weakness of the outdated left/right political spectrum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz-faq.html#faq02 Why did the Advocates create the World's Smallest Political Quiz?] Retrieved from theadvocates.org 06/01/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Nolan-chart.svg|right|thumb|The Nolan Chart overcomes the weaknesses of the outdated Left/Right political spectrum.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;economic&amp;quot; category includes what you do as a producer and consumer. These are your actions that can be described in money. Examples are earning a wage, buying a car, renting a motorhome.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;civil&amp;quot; (or personal) category includes what you do in relationships and expressing yourself. These actions are not measured in money. Examples are the way you worship God, or don't; what books or magazines give you pleasure; your personal tradeoffs between today's fun and tomorrow's health. The Bill of Rights is aimed at your freedoms in this category.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nolan saw how political families can be understood by the degree of individual choice they offer in these categories. You can use this improved way of mapping political thought to better understand your local, national and international political environment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Left/liberals like personal choice in civil matters and central decision-making in economics. They want government to serve the disadvantaged and promote equality. Left/liberals place a high value on good intentions.  They accept diversity in social behavior but seek more equality in economics. They work with libertarians in defending civil liberties and with socialists in advancing economic central planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Right/conservatives like personal choice in economics and central decision-making in civil matters. They want government to defend the community from threats to its moral fiber. Right/conservatives place a high value on laws and legislation.  They accept diversity in economics but seek similarity in social behavior. They work with libertarians in defending economic freedoms and with populists in enforcing community standards in social matters. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialists and [[populist]]s favor central decision-making in both civil and economic matters. They believe the needs of the individual are subordinate to the needs of society. They want government to &amp;quot;correct wrongs.&amp;quot; While they strongly differ on particular programs, both prefer equality in economic and personal matters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Classical liberals/libertarians like personal choice in both civil and economic matters. They believe government's only purpose is to safeguard people from coercion and violence. They value individual responsibility and tolerance. Libertarians accept diversity in both social behavior and in economic situation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Centrists favor selective governmental intervention and temporary affiliations with others. They take a strong stance on few issues, preferring the middle position in most matters. Centrists emphasize practical solutions to current public issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Furthermore, the old fashioned left-right model is fatally flawed. The model implies that if you &amp;quot;go too far&amp;quot; (i.e., are consistent) with any political idea, you end up, in some inexplicable way, at [[totalitarianism]] or anarchism, or maybe both. Pursue conservative thought to its logical extreme, according to this model, and you somehow end up at fascism, which is national socialism, or white supremacy or some other authoritarian position. If you pursue liberal thought too far, you supposedly end up at socialism or communism. This is inconsistent, and it ignores large philosophical differences between, liberalism and communism, and conservatism and fascism. Furthermore, calling anarchism far right is also a misnomer, as there were plenty of explicit adherents to the far-left who dabbled in anarchism, including even the likes of Karl Marx (who advocated that true Communism would have the state fade away), and in fact, the founder of anarchism as a political movement, Pierre Joseph-Proudhon, also adhered to several far-left views such as anti-Semitism and even socialism, including declaring, a'la Jean Jacques Rousseau, that private property was theft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Right-wing==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Right-wing politics}}&lt;br /&gt;
In politics, '''right-wing''' historically referred to a society run by natural law or tradition. It is generally synonymous with politically [[conservative]] beliefs, including economic and social conservatism, and support for a strong military and an active foreign policy. The term &amp;quot;right-wing,&amp;quot; as well as &amp;quot;left-wing,&amp;quot; came from the French Revolution, a reference to where people sat in parliament,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;There was also a theory where the terms originated from the Book of Revelations relating to Jesus transfiguring those on his left side and right side into goats and sheep, respectively.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; although in the United States there never was a [[divine right of kings]] or [[feudal]] nobility, which defines the [[Europe]]an concept of &amp;quot;conservatism&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;the Right.&amp;quot; America since its founding had [[separation of church and state]]. Although generally accepted to be synonymous with conservativism, however, it is to be noted that some leftists try to claim there's a distinction between conservativism and right-wing politics.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term '''Rightist''' refers to someone on the 'right' side of the political spectrum. Politics on the 'right' usually imply taking positions in favor of the traditional system of a society, including its traditional values and its traditional ruling institutions. Compare: [[leftist]].  Following the left-right political spectrum, a &amp;quot;Right-Winger&amp;quot; in America refers to anyone who believes in [[liberty]] and limiting the powers of civil government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is widely accepted, however, that there is not just one dimension of political thought, so that people can unambiguously be classified as 'right' or 'left'.  Nonetheless, the [[political spectrum theory]] still has wide currency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Pejorative usage==&lt;br /&gt;
Usage of terms like &amp;quot;right wing&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;far right&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;ultra-right&amp;quot; by liberals about conservatives is usually intended to conjure up images of fascism and Nazi genocide&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, Thomas D. (June 24, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/24/williams-establishment-anything-not-them-far-right/ Williams: For the Establishment, Anything Not Them Is ‘Far Right’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 24, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kassam, Raheem (November 18, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/11/18/murdochs-times-smears-breitbart-extremist-sky-news-calls-us-ultra-right/ KASSAM: Murdoch’s Reporters Smear me as ‘Ultra Right’ While Happily Working With me in Private]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 24, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Duke, Selwyn (December 10, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/30874-another-far-right-party-rises-in-europe Another Supposed “Far Right” Party Rises in Europe]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 10, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (though any objective interpretation of the left-right political spectrum would reveal that the fascist regimes of WWII Europe were closer to the left-wing than to the right-wing). Indeed, some critics openly liken Israel and its leaders to &amp;quot;Nazis&amp;quot;, even though Israel is the most democratic country in the entire Middle East.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Arabs have full citizenship rights in Israel, even serving as judges and legislators.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The misapplication of the right wing and far right to that of the Nazis is due to Josef Stalin stating after World War II that Nazis and fascism were &amp;quot;far right&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;right wing&amp;quot; both to paint truly right-wing organizations in a negative light and to deflect any blame from the Soviets regarding similar actions they may have conducted, as well as the [[Frankfurt School]] taking advantage of the post-war attempt by the [[American Jewish Committee]] to research the events of Nazism to prevent it from coming back to mislead people per their Marxist agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In modern politics, the term '''far-right''' is used by [[liberal]]s in their attempt to make [[conservative]]s look extreme and unreasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example usage is, &amp;quot;He's a right-winger!&amp;quot; rather than simply, &amp;quot;He's [[conservative]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term is used less frequently by liberals now because it has lost much of its pejorative effect.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Extreme Polarization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dacher Keltner, assistant professor of psychology at the University of California at Berkeley, has found that people have a powerful tendency to exaggerate the views of their ideological opponents, seeing, on average, twice as much difference as actually exists.  Moreover, he has turned up this “imagined [[extremism]]” in a variety of settings, including conflicts over [[abortion]] &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot;, the interpretation of a racial incident, the attitudes of homosexuals and Christian fundamentalists and the choices of English professors toward use of the “Western Canon” in university classes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Partisans and nonpartisans in political disputes, Keltner's study finds, seriously overestimate the polarization between the two sides. Although a tendency to demonize one's opponents is not a new understanding, Keltner's work breaks new ground in being able to measure the extent of the effect by gathering hard data on actual versus perceived differences among the parties to a dispute as well as among neutral observers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;cd=3&amp;amp;ved=0CB4QFjAC&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.solargeneral.com%2Flibrary%2Fwatchdogs.pdf&amp;amp;ei=wT48TJ27OIGesQPh6OicBg&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNH6klBgCEvVYd-hqyzUGyy2kBDAIA&amp;amp;sig2=YQgHfGz4bm2ksQ3RTWyFYQ Patricia McBroom, UC, Berkeley, News Release, 1/4/97, Political attitudes in the U.S. are exaggerated,&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; according to UC Berkeley psychologist in studies of “Imagined Extremism.”] [http://www.solargeneral.com/library/watchdogs.pdf SolarGeneral.com; Library]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nomenklatura]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Political profiling]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~garfinkm/Spectrum.gif&amp;amp;imgrefurl=http://www.pages.drexel.edu/~garfinkm/Spectrum.html&amp;amp;h=697&amp;amp;w=724&amp;amp;sz=181&amp;amp;tbnid=eAv0lAZBMDi55M:&amp;amp;tbnh=135&amp;amp;tbnw=140&amp;amp;prev=/images%3Fq%3Dpolitical%2Bspectrum&amp;amp;start=2&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=images&amp;amp;ct=image&amp;amp;cd=2 a 2-d view] with left-right based on US politics and a novel vertical axis&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Darth Umbris</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Al_Gore&amp;diff=1718578</id>
		<title>Al Gore</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Al_Gore&amp;diff=1718578"/>
		<updated>2021-01-05T00:08:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Darth Umbris: Grammar correction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{President&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Al Gore VP portrait 1994.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|seq=45&lt;br /&gt;
|office=vice&lt;br /&gt;
|term_start=January 20, 1993&lt;br /&gt;
|term_end=January 20, 2001&lt;br /&gt;
|party=Democratic&lt;br /&gt;
|pres=Bill Clinton&lt;br /&gt;
|previous=Dan Quayle&lt;br /&gt;
|next=Dick Cheney&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_date=March 31, 1948&lt;br /&gt;
|birth_place=Washington, D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|death_date=&lt;br /&gt;
|death_place=&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Tipper Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse2= &lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Baptist]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Albert Arnold &amp;quot;Al&amp;quot; Gore, Jr.''' (born March 31, 1948) is the unqualified but leading cheerleader for the &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot; hoax and its [[Leftist]] agenda of increasing government regulation over energy production and use.  He was given the Nobel prize for his [[Chicken Little]]-like claims about a &amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; crisis that subsequently did not occur.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore has spread [[alarmist]] [[propaganda]], proclaiming the end of the world. Gore likes to say that &amp;quot;The Earth has a fever&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/GlobalWarming/story?id=2110628&amp;amp;page=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is making millions of dollars through his hucksterism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/node/11149&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He has no degree in atmospheric sciences, meteorology,  physics, chemistry, biology, or climatology. Gore took two science classes as an undergraduate, scoring a &amp;quot;C+&amp;quot; in one and a &amp;quot;D&amp;quot; in the other.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.larryelder.com/Gore/goredubiousrecord.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2000/03/19/gores-grades-belie-image-of-studiousness/5da4b9e3-a017-4dd5-9bb5-bfc68f0b4eb5/?utm_term=.2d304ead172d&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Charlie Munger mentioned that Gore is &amp;quot;an idiot&amp;quot; but became wealthy through a simple investment formula.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/23/buffett-partner-munger-says-al-gore-is-an-idiot-but-became-rich.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore was the [[Democrat Party]]'s candidate for President in the 2000 election, running on a ticket with Sen. [[Joe Lieberman|Joseph Lieberman]] of [[Connecticut]]. Gore contested the results in Florida. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prior to that Gore was the 45th [[Vice President of the United States of America|Vice President]] of the [[United States]] (1993–2001), a successor to [[Dan Quayle]] and followed by [[Dick Cheney]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Previously Gore, who merely rode on the coattails of the famous political name built by his [[segregation]]ist father, held positions in the [[House of Representatives]] and the [[United States Senate|Senate]] spanning 1977–85 and 1985–93 respectively, as his father had done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
In his early life, Gore attended [[Harvard University]] and (briefly) [[Vanderbilt University]]. At Vanderbilt Divinity School, he failed five out of eight classes and then dropped out.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2000/mar/25/20000325-011032-8259r/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He served in the [[United States Army]] and worked as a war correspondent  during the [[Vietnam War]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kennedy, William V. ''The Military and the Media: Why the Press Cannot Be Trusted to Cover a War''. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1993. &amp;lt;http://com.hilbert.edu/students/papers/carolina-1999/1999vietnam.html&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;He was married to activist [[Tipper Gore]], but the two announced on 6/1/2010 that they were separating after forty years of marriage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/01/al-tipper-gore-break-years-marriage/ Gore's Break Up After 40 Years of Marriage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political career==&lt;br /&gt;
Al Gore followed his father, [[Albert Gore, Sr.]]  a [[Democrat]] Senator from [[Tennessee]], into [[Congress]].  His father was a supporter of the [[New Deal]] and the opponent of ''[[Brown v. Board of Education]]'' who was finally defeated by [[Bill Brock]] in 1970, despite having sent his son to [[Vietnam]] in order to bolster the Gore senatorial campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2000/democracy/gore/stories/gore/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Al Gore supported [[Clarence Thomas]] for the [[Supreme Court]] and, along with his wife, opposed offensive lyrics in rock music.  Gore is the author of ''The [[Assault on Reason]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore ran for president in 1988 but was defeated in the presidential primaries by [[Michael Dukakis]] of [[Massachusetts]].  Gore then continued to serve in the Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;While serving in the Senate, Gore introduced the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991, signed December 9, 1991, which his supporters claim helped develop the Internet and the National Research and Education Network. [https://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d102:SN00272:@@@L&amp;amp;summ2=m&amp;amp;] [http://www.computerhistory.org/internet_history/internet_history_90s.shtml] When Gore himself bragged about creating the internet, he was referring to prior legislation (see quotations below).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russian collusion===&lt;br /&gt;
Billionaire [[Armand Hammer]] worked for the [[KGB]] for most of the 20th century. Hammer's main protégé in [[Washington, D.C.]], was Senator Al Gore, Sr. Hammer subsidized the elder Gore for decades and played a significant role in the rise of Senator Al Gore, Jr. as well. This was known to U.S. [[counterintelligence]] and was no secret in Washington.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rep. Al Gore, Jr., invited Hammer to President [[Ronald Reagan]]'s 1981 inauguration as his personal guest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions lingered about the Gore-Hammer relationship after the [[oligarch]]’s death in 1990, though the [[liberal media]] ignored it through the eight years when, as Bill Clinton’s vice president, Gore was in the White House. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Gore ran for president in 2000, the [[MSM]] never pried into [[Gore]]’s [[Kremlin]] linkages. The ''[[New York Times]]'' published a piece about the questionable Gore-Hammer business relationship, illuminating that both Gore Sr., whom the FBI once wanted to prosecute as a [[Soviet]] agent, and Gore Jr. repeatedly helped Hammer in exchange for sweetheart deals and cash. The ''New York Times'' never once mentioned the KGB.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2000/03/19/us/2000-campaign-vice-president-gore-family-s-ties-oil-company-magnate-reap-big.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One month before the 2000 election, the Russian press agency ''Ekho Moskvy'' ran a sensational piece. Duma deputy Aleksei Mitrofanov demanded Russia’s Federal Archive Service provide him with any documentation they possessed regarding the secret relationship between Armand Hammer and Albert Gore, Sr: “I already have this information. My purpose is to get it officially,” Mitrofanov stated. Mitrofanov wanted to illuminate {{Quotebox|“the mechanism of supporting Armand Hammer and Albert Gore, Sr. by the Central Committee of the [[Communist Party of the Soviet Union]]…they were financing Gore’s coming out against the [[Vietnam war]], as well as his assistance in closing an FBI investigation against Hammer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this is very interesting, especially in connection with the ongoing presidential campaign in the United States…the incumbent President [Clinton] also started his political career on money given by Hammer or, in fact, on Soviet money. Everybody knows that Hammer got his most profitable contracts in the Soviet Union from [[Politburo]] decisions.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://observer.com/2018/11/democrats-kremlin-problem-al-gore-maxine-waters/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}} Mitrofanov concluded by stating that Albert Gore, Jr. also started his career on Hammer's money.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.aim.org/media-monitor/bill-clintons-soviet-connection/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Association with godhatesfags.org===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:20001025 xnjdo FredGoreFiny.jpg|thumb|180px|left|From left to right: Fred Phelps, Al Gore, and former Kansas Gov. Joan Finney.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1988 Gore courted the support of controversial [[activist]] [[Fred Phelps]] of the [[Westboro Baptist Church]] in Topeka, Kansas.  In appreciation for Phelps' help and support of Gore, Phelps was provided tickets to the [[inauguration]] of [[President Clinton]] in 1992 and 1996.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15559 Gore sought help from anti-homosexual group], 'God hates fags' creator preaches 'hate because the Bible preaches hate', By Jon E. Dougherty, ''WorldNetDaily.com'', October 25, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps later changed his opinion about Gore when he joined Bill Clinton on the 1992 presidential ticket.  Phelps turned on him and claimed Gore was a &amp;quot;conservative&amp;quot; icon of the Democrat Party that sold out on some critical social issues.  Phelps also demonstrated against Clinton and Gore during the 1997 inaugural.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={91058469-F6DE-4615-8B2A-73CDF3E8FCAC}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4179/is_20001104/ai_n11753681&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Vice President===&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States presidential election, 1992|1992 Presidential Election]], Democrat nominee [[Bill Clinton]] selected Gore as his running mate. They won the election, and Gore was sworn in as Vice President on January 20, 1993.  Clinton and Gore were elected to a second term in [[United States presidential election, 1996|1996]]. Gore had little influence in the [[Clinton Administration]], and almost nothing of significance is attributed to him. Although the only vice-president to be born in Washington, D.C., he went on an inauguration tour of the Jefferson Monticello, he pointed to four busts of George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and Marquis de Lafayette asking the curator who are these guys.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4482741/clinton-gore-monticello&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Taxed Social Security===&lt;br /&gt;
Among his notable achievements, the one he is least known for is casting the tie-breaking vote to [[tax]] elderly [[Social Security]] benefits who earn as little as $22,000 per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1993 President Clinton sought to increase taxes on [[Social Security]] benefits of the elderly and disabled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.house.gov/house/Contract/seniorsd.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The final version of the bill passed by the [[Democrat]]ically controlled Congress increased taxes on beneficiaries from the first 50% to 85%&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20040408115747/www.ssa.gov/OACT/HOP/hopi.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of benefits (or &amp;quot;annuity payments&amp;quot; as they were originally called). [[Vice President]] Al Gore cast the deciding tie-breaker vote in the Senate to make the tax increase law.  The Clinton-Gore tax increase on Social Security benefits imposed a 70% [[income tax]] rate on a retired couple making as little as $22,000 per year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=vLg4iJR0J9kC&amp;amp;pg=PA16593&amp;amp;lpg=PA16593&amp;amp;dq=Vice+President+Gore+cast+the+tie-breaking+vote%2Bsocial+security&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=-ImIDX6fHa&amp;amp;sig=ttWVUNAIVsLQoEg1ZhCntHB_02Y&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ei=dobVTMr9HoOglAe0iuX9CA&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;oi=book_result&amp;amp;ct=result&amp;amp;resnum=2&amp;amp;ved=0CBYQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=Vice%20President%20Gore%20cast%20the%20tie-breaking%20vote%2Bsocial%20security&amp;amp;f=false Congressional Record, Comments by Rep. Christopher Cox,] July 27, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Enron scandal===&lt;br /&gt;
In July 1997, [[Enron]] CEO Ken Lay met with Vice President Al Gore and President [[Bill Clinton]] and  in the [[Oval Office]]. Clinton, Lay, and Gore discussed approval of the [[Kyoto protocol]]s on carbon emissions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/transcripts/gopresponse_memo.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An internal Enron memo says the treaty will, &amp;quot;do more to promote Enron's business than will almost any other regulatory initiative outside of restructuring the energy and natural gas industries in Europe and the United States.&amp;quot; Lay told Enron employees Bill Clinton solicited Lay's views &amp;quot;in advance of a climate treaty to be negotiated at an international conference&amp;quot; And Lay said Clinton agreed to support Lay's proposal of a carbon emissions trading exchange from which Enron planned to profit hugely while American consumers paid steep price increases for electricity and natural gas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert Schlesinger, &amp;quot;Enron Ties May Also Tar Democrats; Company Lobbied Clinton, Donated To Top Legislators,&amp;quot; The Boston Globe, January 24, 2002&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Senate rejected the Kyoto treaty by a 95-to-0 vote on August 15, 1997.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://talking_points.tripod.com/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Al Gore and uncharitableness===&lt;br /&gt;
''See also'': [[Liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] and [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the ''[[American Spectator]]'' declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The last two Democratic Party nominees for President have come up short on the charity scale. Al Gore has been famously stingy when it comes to actually giving his own money to charities. In 1998 he was embarrassed when his tax returns revealed that he gave just $353 to charity...&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044126&amp;amp;c=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2000 Presidential nominee===&lt;br /&gt;
As is often the case for incumbent Vice Presidents, Gore was nominated as his party's candidate in the [[United States presidential election, 2000|2000 Presidential Election]].  He lost to [[George W. Bush]] in the [[Electoral College]] after a close vote, in which Gore garnered more popular votes than Bush, but fewer electoral votes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore challenged the election results and pursued a recount based on his far-fetched claim of violation of the [[Equal Protection Clause]], which the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] rejected by a 7-2 vote, in ''[[Bush v. Gore]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 13, 2000, after an extensive court battle ([[Bush v. Gore]]), Gore accepted Bush's election to the presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leip, David. &amp;quot;2000 Presidential General Election Results.&amp;quot; David Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. 2005. 18 Mar. 2007 &amp;lt;http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/national.php?year=2000&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Later activities==&lt;br /&gt;
Gore started an investment firm to invest in environmentally sustainable technology and industries and a cable channel (Current TV), and is an adviser to [[Google]]. He was also mentioned as a possible [[2008 presidential election|2008 presidential candidate]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2012 Gore sold his liberal television network [[Current TV]], which had a focus on environmental and social issues, to oil-rich billionaires and the [[Al Jazeera]] network. It suffered from low ratings and unprofitability (i.e., not able to meet costs, such as paying workers) under his management.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Climate hucksterism===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2017, Gore stated that he could consider becoming a Roman Catholic due to Pope Francis's position on climate change.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, Thomas D. (August 4, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/04/al-gore-because-of-pope-francis-i-really-could-become-a-catholic/ Al Gore: ‘Because of Pope Francis, I Really Could Become a Catholic’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 4, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2018, Gore alleged that the &amp;quot;bitter cold&amp;quot; weather the U.S. was seeing that winter was &amp;quot;exactly what we should expect from the climate crisis.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Delingpole, James (January 5, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/05/this-bitter-cold-is-what-global-warming-looks-like-explains-al-gore/ This ‘Bitter Cold’ Is What Global Warming Looks Like, Explains Al Gore]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Murphy, James (January 6, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/27893-bitter-cold-is-exactly-what-we-should-expect-from-global-warming-says-al-gore Bitter Cold Is “Exactly What We Should Expect” From Global Warming, Says Al Gore]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 6, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Valerie (January 7, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jan/7/al-gore-under-fire-climate-change-claim-bomb-cyclo/ Al Gore under fire for claiming icy storm is ‘exactly what we should expect from climate crisis’]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 8, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite his climate change promotion, many of Gore's actions do not line up with his philosophy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lowe, Tiana (June 6, 2017). [https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/448342/bill-de-blasio-al-gores-climate-change-hypocrisy For America’s Loudest Climate Alarmists, Do as I Say, Not as I Do]. ''National Review''. Retrieved August 2, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ambrose, Jay (May 16, 2009). [https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/05/16/al_gores_hypocrisy_astounding_96529.html Al Gore's Hypocrisy Astounding]. ''RealClearPolitics''. Retrieved August 2, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goldstein, Lorrie (July 29, 2017). [http://www.torontosun.com/2017/07/29/al-gores-hypocrisy-breathtaking Al Gore's hypocrisy 'breathtaking']. ''Toronto Sun''. Retrieved August 2, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as seen in a 2017 study that found that Gore's mansion used 21 times more energy in the previous year than the average American home.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chasmar, Jessica (August 2, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/2/al-gores-nashville-estate-expends-21-times-more-en/ Al Gore’s Nashville estate expends 21 times more energy a year than typical U.S. home, study says]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved August 2, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kew, Ben (August 2, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/02/report-al-gores-home-burns-34-times-more-electricity-than-average-u-s-household/ Report: Al Gore’s Home Burns 34 Times More Electricity Than Average U.S. Household]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 2, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He continued making false claims.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murphy, James (September 17, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/30092-al-gore-caught-lying-about-climate-change-again Al Gore Caught Lying About Climate Change — Again]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 19, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Schlockumentary film producer===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GoreFireBreathing.jpg|right|200px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Gore and the ''Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change'' shared the 2007 [[Nobel Peace Prize]] for his work on [[climate change]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,312024,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
Gore starred in the 2006 film about &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot; entitled, ''[[An Inconvenient Truth]],'' which won an [[Academy Award]]. In 2007, the British High Court directed teachers to inform students to whom they show the film that it &amp;quot;is a political work and promotes only one side of the argument&amp;quot; and to draw attention to eleven specific inaccuracies. Furthermore, the court advised, &amp;quot;If teachers present the Film without making this plain they may be in breach of ... the Education Act 1996 and guilty of political [[indoctrination]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sheppard, Noel. &amp;quot;Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’.&amp;quot; [Weblog NewsBusters] 08 Oct 2007. Newsbusters. 9 Oct 2007 &amp;lt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/09/court-identifies-eleven-inaccuracies-al-gore-s-inconvenient-truth http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/09/court-identifies -eleven-inaccuracies-al-gore-s-inconvenient-truth]&amp;gt;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Despite the errors, the judge also concluded &amp;quot;four main scientific hypotheses, each of which is very well supported by research published in respected, peer-reviewed journals and accords with the latest conclusions of the IPCC.” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,301067,00.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore released a new movie, ''An Inconvenient Sequel'', in 2017.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richardson, Valerie (July 27, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/27/al-gores-inconvenient-sequel-meets-with-skepticism/ Not so hot: Al Gore’s ‘Inconvenient Sequel’ meets with skepticism even from left]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved August 2, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It did not perform well in theaters, placing itself at 15th place on its opening weekend.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richardson, Valerie (August 7, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/7/al-gores-inconvenient-sequel-meets-cool-reception/ Al Gore’s ‘Inconvenient Sequel’ meets with cool reception, placing 15th at box office]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved August 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/08/07/al-gores-inconvenient-sequel-bombs-at-box-office-ranks-in-15th-place.html Al Gore's 'An Inconvenient Sequel' bombs at the box office, ranks in 15th place]. ''Fox News''. August 7, 2017. Retrieved August 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Concha, Joe (August 7, 2017). [https://thehill.com/homenews/media/345646-al-gore-climate-change-sequel-bombs-at-box-office Al Gore climate change sequel bombs at box office]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved August 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Climatologist Roy W. Spencer, the principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, released an ebook criticizing the film for having distortions and factual errors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richardson, Valerie (August 22, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/22/climate-scientist-rebuts-al-gore-film-bad-science/ Gore documentary called ‘bad science’ as sales plummet]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved August 23, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other climate alarmist movies did poorly in theaters that year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Toto, Christian (December 28, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/28/global-warming-films-flop-box-office-2017/ Hollywood tries to save the Earth, but moviegoers aren’t buying eco-messages anymore]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Clinton Global Initiative and mob activism===&lt;br /&gt;
Speaking in Manhattan to the fourth annual Clinton Global Initiative, Gore wants to use &amp;quot;civil disobedience&amp;quot; to combat the construction of coal power plants without the ability to capture carbon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,427421,00.html Al Gore Urges 'Civil Disobedience' Toward Coal Plants] Fox News, September 24, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Civil disobedience or the call for intentional violation of laws is an extremist point of view. It is believed that he was speaking in regards to Western nation coal plants. No mention of China and their coal production. The gravest threat from coal pollution comes from China, in which two plants are constructed per week and 500 more plants over the next 10 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=9947668 China's Coal-Fueled Boom Has Costs] NPR, May 2, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sexual Assault allegations===&lt;br /&gt;
Not long after his marital separation became public, Portland, Oregon police announced that they had investigated Gore on [[sexual assault]] charges over an encounter with massage therapist Molly Hagerty in October 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jdRlS1EbF66_3PpAvC9UlCbBtuqgD9GIKE580 AP; Police release tape from Al Gore sexual assault accuser's interview&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hagerty, a massage therapist to the stars, has accused the former vice president of repeatedly groping and kissing her during a late-night, alcohol-fueled attack in a [[Oregon]] luxury hotel suite in October 2006. Detectives investigated the claims in 2006 and 2009 but decided not to pursue the case. However, Portland Police Chief Michael Reese said on July 1, 2010, that ''&amp;quot;we have determined there were procedural issues with the 2009 investigation that merit reopening the case.&amp;quot; Officers took the accuser's statement but didn't proceed further and didn't clear that decision with higher-ups. In addition, prosecutors were not made aware of the 2009 investigation until recently.&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/07/portland_police_mishandled_gor.html Portland police mishandled Al Gore sex-abuse case, Chief says.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticism==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Al and GW.png|thumb|400px|Cartoon by Greg Sheffield]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Ann Coulter]] claims Gore exaggerated his military service record: &amp;quot;Al Gore endlessly bragged to the media about his service in Vietnam. 'I took my turn regularly on the perimeter in these little firebases out in the boonies. Something would move, we'd fire first and ask questions later,' he told Vanity Fair. And then we found out Gore had a personal bodyguard in Vietnam, the most dangerous weapon he carried was a typewriter, and he left after three months.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.anncoulter.com/cgi-local/welcome.cgi&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007, Al Gore received criticism for his high electricity use. When it was discovered that Gore's electric utility bill is 20 times higher than the average American's&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/02/26/al-gore-hypocrite/ Al Gore -  Electric consumption bill]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; many of his detractors accused him of not living up to his own standards. In the year since the 2007 criticism, energy use at Gore's mansion increased 10%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200806/CUL20080619a.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
Gore's defenders claim that the majority of that power came from &amp;quot;green,&amp;quot; or environmentally friendly, power sources such as solar and wind power. These power sources are much more expensive than traditional power sources such as coal and nuclear power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, some conservatives have pointed to Gore's use of a private jet while spreading the message about the dangers of &amp;quot;global warming.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gnn.tv/articles/2332/More_Inconvenient_Truths_About_Al_Gore More Inconvenient Truths About Al Gore]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attention has also been called to Gore's profits from mining royalties, specifically the mining of zinc adjacent to his property that he leased in Tennessee, which has released millions of pounds of potentially toxic substances into the environment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=200770316074 Tennessee Mine Enriched Gore, Scarred Land]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The mine has been closed since 2003.  New owner Strategic Resource Acquisition is planning to re-open the mine.  From ''The Tennessean'' (3/12/07):&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Last week, Gore sent a letter asking the company to work with Earthworks, a national [[Environmentalist|environmental group]], to make sure the operation doesn’t damage the environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'We would like for you to engage with us in a process to ensure that the mine becomes a global example of environmental best practices,' Gore wrote.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
However, this was after he had already made $500,000 from the mining operations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2007/3/17/93301.shtml?s=ic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Al Gore's fondness for using [[buzzword]]s became the focus of a prank played on Gore by students at [[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]] in 1996.  MIT students distributed a [[bingo]] card containing meaningless buzzwords Gore was known for peppering his speeches with, including &amp;quot;infobahn,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;knowledge worker,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;vector,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;high confidence,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;information marketplace.&amp;quot;  Sure enough, during Gore's speech at MIT, a commotion erupted in the audience when enough buzzwords were said to complete the Bingo card.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hacks.mit.edu/by_year/1996/gore/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Gore's current favorite buzzword is &amp;quot;unified national smart grid,&amp;quot; which he promotes in conjunction with his catastrophic global warming prophecies, earning him ridicule as &amp;quot;The Goracle&amp;quot; in a ''[[Washington Post]]'' article by Dana Milbank.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/28/AR2009012803318_pf.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Bjorn Lomborg]] has additionally criticized Al Gore for framing global warming using buzzword terms as some sort of transcendent generational quest, as when Gore called the so-called &amp;quot;climate crisis&amp;quot; the &amp;quot;chance to experience...a generational mission, the exhileration of a compelling moral purpose, a shared and unifying cause, the thrill of...the restless human need for transcendence.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lomborg, Bjorn.  ''Cool It''.  New York: Vintage Books, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fabrications and blunders===&lt;br /&gt;
*On February 20, 2000, Gore claimed he has “always, always, always” supported [[Roe v. Wade]]. However, in 1977, he voted for the Hyde Amendment, which says that [[abortion]] “takes the life of an unborn child who is a living human being,” and that there is no constitutional right to abortion. He cast many other votes favorable to the pro-life cause and earned an 84 percent rating over the course of his entire U.S. House career (1977 to 1984) from the National Right to Life Committee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gargaro.com/lifequotes.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*On February 4, 2000, Gore claimed, “We had a huge event with 3,000 people at [[Ohio State University]].” In reality, “Officials at that rally said the room where it had taken place did not hold more than 1,200 people, and, given the area needed for the staging erected for the occasion, they estimated the crowd at 500,” according to known [[liberal]] media source the ''[[New York Times]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*On February 2, 2000, on ''[[Good Morning America]]'' Al Gore claimed, “We won in every single [[demographic category]]” in the [[New Hampshire]] [[primary]]. In reality [[Bill Bradley]] carried [[male]] voters and voters aged 18–29, according to exit polls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore's comment that he &amp;quot;took the initiative in creating the [[Internet]]&amp;quot; was criticized in the ''St. Petersburg Times'' (Florida):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:This was not the first time Gore has overreached. A year ago Gore told reporters that he and his wife, [[Tipper Gore|Tipper]], at the time when they were college sweethearts, were the inspiration for the novel &amp;quot;[[Love Story]].&amp;quot; That came as news to the befuddled author, [[Erich Segal]]. [http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_10/wiggins/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore wrote an opinion piece in the ''New York Times'' in which he said &amp;quot;[he] genuinely wishes [[global warming]] was an illusion,&amp;quot; claiming it is very real. This despite mountains of fraud uncovered by [[ClimateGate]]. [[Fred Thompson]] replied, &amp;quot;Hey, Al... the genie says you still have two wishes left.&amp;quot;  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://twitter.com/fredthompson/status/9876626632 Fred Thompson, Twitter feed, March 2, 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
* Gore said, '''''&amp;quot;I took the initiative in creating the Internet.&amp;quot;''''' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blitzer, Wolf. Transcript: Vice President Gore on CNN's 'Late Edition'. &amp;lt;u&amp;gt;CNN&amp;lt;/u&amp;gt;. 9 March 1999. 2 June 2007 &amp;lt;[https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/03/09/president.2000/transcript.gore/ https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/03/09/president.2000 /transcript.gore/]&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Gore falsely claimed that he discovered problems in Love Canal and fixed them. He said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I called for a congressional investigation and a hearing. I looked around the country for other sites like that. I found a little place in upstate New York called Love Canal. Had the first hearing on that issue.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbsnews.com/stories/1999/12/02/politics/main72638.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;That was the one that started it all. ... We made a huge difference and it was all because one high school student got involved.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I love [[Van Jones]]. I love his work. I love his heart and his commitment and his intellect. I love his mission. He has wisely picked a part of this set of interwoven challenges that should have been addressed much more forcefully by me and others long ago.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/01/12/090112fa_fact_kolbert?currentPage=all&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* During an interview with ''Slate'', regarding the Climate Research Unit at East Anglia University, a question was asked concerning a sense from the [[Climategate]] e-mails and from data that was &amp;quot;hidden and hoarded.&amp;quot; These truths are the opposite of the case Al Gore made in his book about having an open and fair debate. Gore responded with a lack of command of the most basic details of anything related to Earth and climate. He said, &lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|I haven’t read all the e-mails, but the most recent one is more than 10 years old. [...] So an e-mail exchange more than 10 years ago including somebody’s opinion that a particular study isn’t any good is one thing [...] but where the scientific consensus is concerned, it’s completely unchanged. What we’re seeing is a set of changes worldwide that just make this discussion over 10-year-old e-mails kind of silly.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/08/al-gore-cant-tell-time-thinks-most-recent-climategate-email-is-more-than-10-years-old/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2237789/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
:The most recent emails in Climategate were from November 12, 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* In an interview aired on the ''[[CBS]]'' ''Early Show'', Al Gore read his global warming poem to Harry Smith.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Noel Sheppard. [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/12/15/al-gore-reads-poem-harry-smith-says-wow-i-m-happy-hear-it-your-voice Gore Reads Poem, Harry Smith Swoons: 'Wow...I’m Happy to Hear it in Your Voice'], ''[[NewsBusters]]'', December 15, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Rush Limbaugh]]. [http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_120709/content/01125109.guest.html Algore's Idiotic Poem and All the Latest from the ClimateGate Stack], RushLimbaugh.com, December 7, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Goregaia.jpg|200px|right|thumb|Former Vice President Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
:''One thin September soon''&lt;br /&gt;
:''A floating continent disappears''&lt;br /&gt;
:''In midnight sun''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Vapors rise as''&lt;br /&gt;
:''Fever settles on an acid sea''&lt;br /&gt;
:''Neptune's bones dissolve''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Snow glides from the mountain''&lt;br /&gt;
:''Ice fathers floods for a season''&lt;br /&gt;
:''A hard rain comes quickly''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Then dirt is parched''&lt;br /&gt;
:''Kindling is placed in the forest''&lt;br /&gt;
:''For the lightning's celebration''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Unknown creatures''&lt;br /&gt;
:''Take their leave, unmourned''&lt;br /&gt;
:''Horsemen ready their stirrups''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''Passion seeks heroes and friends''&lt;br /&gt;
:''The bell of the city''&lt;br /&gt;
:''On the hill is rung''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''The shepherd cries''&lt;br /&gt;
:''The hour of choosing has arrived''&lt;br /&gt;
:''Here are your tools''}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Al Gore|Al Gore on Breaking News]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Algore]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.algore.com/ Official website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=276476942822261 Al Gore, Ignoble Laureate], ''Investor's Business Daily'', October 5, 2007&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/al_gore/index.html Al Gore News and Commentary] from the ''New York Times''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/author/al-gore/ What Liberals Say - Al Gore], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.compeaus.com/frozen.html Yearly Frozen Gore Ice Sculpture In Alaska]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{USVicePresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Gore, Al}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Environmentalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nobel Laureates in Peace]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tennessee]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Baptists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Representatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Failed Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Current TV]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Darth Umbris</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=1718559</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=1718559"/>
		<updated>2021-01-04T23:23:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Darth Umbris: Her first name does not have an 'e' on the end.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Elizabeth Warren 2016 DNC cropped.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|[[Elizabeth Warren]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (alternately called a left-winger or [[leftism|leftist]]) is someone who advocates an increase in [[government]] spending, power, and control, such as [[ObamaCare]]. Liberals often support the [[censorship]] and [[denial]] of biblical [[Christianity]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (March 18, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/faith-and-morals/item/31774-horowitz-american-left-is-at-war-with-christianity Horowitz: American Left Is at War With Christianity]. ''The New American''. Retrieved March 18, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-times/article.php?articleid=2062&lt;br /&gt;
*Anderson, Troy (June 4, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/32393-the-war-to-destroy-christianity-in-america The War to Destroy Christianity in America]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 4, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dreher, Rod (October 14, 2019). [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/democrats-versus-traditional-christians-beto-orourke-elizabeth-warren/ Democrats Vs. Traditional Christians]. ''The American Conservative''. Retrieved October 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dreher, Rod (October 11, 2019). [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/beto-vs-religious-liberty/ Beto Vs. Religious Liberty]. ''The American Conservative''. Retrieved October 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Scaliger, Charles (December 26, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/34255-the-left-s-abc-anything-but-christianity-syndrome The Left’s “ABC” (“Anything But Christianity”) Syndrome]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 26, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and consistently [[conservative]] viewpoints. Liberals who are a part of the [[secular left]] prefer [[atheism]]/[[agnosticism]] over the Christian [[faith]], as [[atheism]] has no objective morality to hinder their big government plans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/232212/fox-contributor-claims-rolling-stone-uva-story-part-of-liberal-plot-to-romanticize-being-a-victim-of-rape/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increasingly, liberals side with the [[homosexual agenda]], including [[same-sex marriage|homosexual &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]].  Liberals favor a [[welfare state]] where people receive endless entitlements without working.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/05/23/reform-conservatives-tackle-the-failed-liberal-welfare-state/ Reform conservatives tackle the failed liberal welfare state], [[Washington Post]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The liberal ideology has degenerated into economically unsound views and [[Liberal bigotry|intolerant ideology]]. All liberals support, in knee-jerk fashion, the opposite of [[conservative]] principles, while lacking an actual ideology or values of their own.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eaglerising.com/22901/liberal-crybabies-get-offended-by-caitlyn-jenner-costume/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Secular left|Many of them]] [[Secularized Language|cannot understand]] Christian language.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, Thomas D., Ph.D. (December 26, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/26/religiously-ignorant-liberals-mistake-new-king-at-christmas-for-donald-trump/ Religiously-Ignorant Liberals Mistake ‘New King’ at Christmas for Donald Trump]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved December 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberals are especially prone to believe [[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]], particularly those that denigrate people or views they disagree with,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murdock, Deroy (March 29, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/collusion-clingers-and-their-flat-earth-forebears/ Collusion Clingers and Their Flat-Earth Forebears]. ''National Review''. Retrieved March 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://video.foxnews.com/v/6020444417001/?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips Tucker: Brennan and Comey disgraced themselves]. ''Fox News Video''. March 29, 2019. Retrieved March 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and they are [[Liberal intolerance|increasingly intolerant]] of opposing viewpoints.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Folks, Jeffrey (July 30, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/leftists-dont-want-equality-in-america-they-want-revenge Leftists don’t want equality in America. They want revenge.] ''LifeSiteNews'' (from the ''American Thinker''). Retrieved July 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Modern liberals reject [[Classical Liberal|classical liberalism]], which is now a purported aspect of conservatism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vance, Laurence M. (December 27, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/34256-review-of-for-a-new-liberalism Review of “For a New Liberalism”]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 27, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polling data has consistently shown that a larger percentage of Americans identify as conservative, rather than as liberal, by a margin of 35% to 26% as of 2017; while the gap between self-identified conservatives and self-identified liberals has been narrowing in recent years,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://news.gallup.com/poll/225074/conservative-lead-ideology-down-single-digits.aspx Conservative Lead in U.S. Ideology is Down to Single Digits]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; liberals and &amp;quot;progressives&amp;quot; oftentimes falsely claim that liberals outnumber conservatives. Liberals are especially active at secular universities, however.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Maxim (January 18, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/socialism-rising-universities-and-radical-profs-helping-steer-leftward-shift-in-politics Socialism rising: Universities and ‘radical’ profs helping steer leftward shift in politics, critics say]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political positions and practices of liberals ==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Liberals support the following political positions and practices''':&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/columnists/jonahgoldberg/2014/02/21/liberal-students-have-a-funny-definition-of-diversity-n1798157&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Opposition to [[Natural Law]], [[unalienable rights]], and [[republicanism]], and support for the [[War on Freedom]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Wasting money on ineffective government programs (the significant economic problems in the [[Eurozone]] due to government debt will no doubt increasingly discredit this aspect of liberal ideology and make things more difficult for advocates of liberal economic ideologies)&lt;br /&gt;
*Many liberals are increasingly attempting to limit free speech.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;The slow death of free speech&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/20/suzanne-fields-how-the-liberal-left-is-killing-fre/ The slow death of free speech] by Suzanne Fields, ''Washington Times'', 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtonexaminer.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/why-does-the-left-want-to-suppress-free-speech/article/2532270 Why does the left want to suppress free speech?] by Michael Barone, Washington Examiner, 2013&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Judging people by the color of their skin, rather than the content of their character.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-woke-left-vs-martin-luther-king-jr The woke Left vs. Martin Luther King Jr.], ''[[Washington Examiner]]'', January 20, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the [[United States]], the [[Democrat Party]] and liberals have moved so [[far left]] that there are now political figures involved in Democrat politics who are sympathetic to [[Communism]]. For example, [[Anita Dunn]], an American political strategist who served as [[White House]] Communications Director from April through November 2009 in [[Obama Administration]], said that [[Mao Zedong]] was her favorite political philosopher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/10/17/obama-debate-advisor-anita-dunn-mao/ Obama Debate Coach Named Mao as Favorite Political Philosopher] by [[Ben Shapiro]], Bretbart News, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Bernie Sanders]], a leading candidate in the Democrat Party's 2016 presidential nomination, although he is an adherent of [[social democracy]], he also has a history of involvement with [[Marxism|Marxist]] organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/ Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist], New York Post by [[Paul Sperry]], New York Post,January 16, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.wnd.com/2016/01/is-bernie-sanders-a-communist/ IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST?] by Joseph Farah, WND, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/kenneth-d-ackerman/history-lesson-bernie-san_b_9355082.html History Lesson: Bernie Sanders is no 'Communist,' and 'Democratic Socialists' are as American as Apple Pie], Huffington Post, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sanders shocked his fellow liberals by putting up a [[Soviet Union]] flag in his Senate office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/ Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist], New York Post by Paul Sperry, New York Post, January 16, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1998, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was founded by Sanders, had the song ''Red Revolution'' (a song advocating communist revolution) featured on a website that they shared with the Democratic Socialists of America.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* In 1993, Hugh E. Rodham, father of [[Hillary Clinton]], made the statement about the Democrat Party, which is a party strongly supported by liberals, “Democrats are one step short of Communism.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;constitution.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://constitution.com/democrat-party-overrun-communist/  Before his death in 1993, Hugh E. Rodham, father of Hillary Clinton, made the statement, “Democrats are one step short of Communism.”], Constitution.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1988, the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), after decades of running their own presidential candidates, stopped running presidential candidates because the gap between Democrats and American communists had grown smaller.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;youtube.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pjFfE1MNFk Communists, the Democrat Party and Snopes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2016, the CPUSA urged people not to vote for Donald Trump even if they disliked Hillary Clinton (an indirect endorsement of Clinton).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;youtube.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Although there are still some very substantial differences between Communists and Democrats/liberals, the line between Communists/Democrats/liberals continues to blur in the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;constitution.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Ironically, the leading Communist country in the world, [[Communist Party of China|Communist China]], has moved farther away from Communism and now has a mixed economy of [[capitalism]] and state owned enterprises.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[China's The Most Viciously Free Market Economy On The Planet Right Now], Forbes, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hillary Clinton.jpg|right|200px|thumb|[[Hillary Clinton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Denial of science&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.postlibertarian.com/2012/09/why-do-liberals-hate-science/ Why Do Liberals Hate Science?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (especially [[creation science]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Government's ability to solve economic problems&amp;lt;ref name=studentNews&amp;gt;[http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Hypocrisy|Hypocrisy]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002849963/3038298682_real_verse_liberal_hypocrisy_xlarge.png&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The belief that Islamic terrorism is not a huge threat, and that the main reason for Islamic extremists' hostility towards America is because of bad foreign policy &amp;lt;ref name=studentNews /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Brainwashing voters with propaganda&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hedonism|Hedonism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and state-encouraged [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rejection of Biblical standards&lt;br /&gt;
* Naive acceptance of the [[Idea of Progress]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hate|Hatred]] of those they disagree with (see: [[Liberal hate speech]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Murder]] (through [[abortion]], [[infanticide]], [[assisted suicide]], and [[euthanasia]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of people, organizations, and beliefs they disagree with&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/07/watch-what-you-say-the-new-liberal-power-elite-won-t-tolerate-dissent.html Watch What You Say, The New Liberal Power Elite Won’t Tolerate Dissent], [[The Daily Beast]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Socialism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://famguardian.org/subjects/Politics/Articles/Liberals.htm 60 Hard Truths about &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Unsuccessful Keynesian economics as opposed to sound free-market economics&lt;br /&gt;
* Crying instead of accepting reality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://liberaltears.net/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Cessation of teacher-led [[prayer]] in classrooms and school/state-sponsored religious events.&lt;br /&gt;
* Ending Western morality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2012/07/13/5_ways_liberalism_destroys_virtue]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Pseudo-intellectualism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://eljam.blogspot.com/2005/09/i-hate-pseudo-intellectuals.html I hate pseudo-intellectuals]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Affirmative action&amp;lt;ref name=studentNews /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support and justification of [[pornography]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones, Angela (December 31, 2020). [https://www.salon.com/2020/12/30/the-anti-porn-religious-lobby-just-destroyed-the-livelihoods-of-thousands-of-pornographers/ The anti-porn religious lobby just destroyed the livelihoods of thousands of pornographers]. ''Salon''. Retrieved December 31, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for obscenity, pornography and violence in video games&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by '''liberal''' Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography.  These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* ''De facto'' authoritarian government&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2014/07/liberal_authori.html Liberal Authoritarianism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Authoritarianism|Authoritarian]] mindset&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richarson, Bradford (June 11, 2016). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/11/liberals-not-conservatives-more-likely-possess-psy/ Study from 2012 now corrected to show liberals, not conservatives, more authoritarian]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 29, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-funded medical care, such as [[Obamacare]] and &amp;quot;[[Medicare For All]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism|Fascist tendencies]] (see also: [[Homo-fascism]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Strong support for the [[Nanny State]] and [[big government]] policies&lt;br /&gt;
* Government interference into the smallest details of peoples' everyday lives&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Terrell, Rebecca (May 7, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/32100-forced-vaccinations Forced Vaccinations: Is It Time for Big Brother to Become Your Doctor?] ''The New American''. Retrieved May 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Duke, Selwyn (May 8, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/32236-tolerant-big-brother-let-people-drink-smoke-and-eat-red-meat-says-health-minister Tolerant Big Brother: Let People Drink, Smoke, and Eat Red Meat, Says Health Minister]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 8, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Prioritizing social engineering and political correctness in the military over readiness and national security&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chalk, Casey (November 8, 2019). [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/what-is-the-woke-military-really-preparing-us-for/ What is the New ‘Woke’ Military Really Preparing Us For?] ''The American Conservative''. Retrieved November 8, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[evolution and liberalism|Belief in evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Destroying the Christian foundations on which America was built. &lt;br /&gt;
* Destroying conservative family values and replacing them with immoral [[Hollywood values]], such as abortion&lt;br /&gt;
* Brainwashing through government-censored [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Limiting personal freedom.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://conservative.wikia.com/wiki/Democratic_Party Democratic Party]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal support for gun control is an example of this.&lt;br /&gt;
* High progressive taxes&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ijreview.com/2014/07/157256-course-lower-state-taxes-helps-growth-studys-results-prove/ This Nationwide Study Challenges Everything Liberals Have Told You About Raising Taxes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a form of class warfare against wealthy business owners.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/Progressive_taxation Progressive taxation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Placement of men and women in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Slowly eroding the U.S. through [[Progressivism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americanprogressivism.wordpress.com/ What Is Progressivism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]] and homosexual adoption&lt;br /&gt;
* Failed [[tax and spend]] economics&lt;br /&gt;
* Smearing&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.truthnation.com/trumps-slogan-is-a-throwback-to-reagan-and-liberals-are-furious-make-america-great-again/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Libertine sexual morality (see: [[Evolutionary belief and sexual immorality]] and [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic sector regulations&amp;lt;ref name=studentNews /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Denial of conservative roles in history. For example, liberals frequently claim&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.deism.com/washington.htm George Washington and Deism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that George Washington was a deist when he was actually a devout Episcopalian.&lt;br /&gt;
* Spreading of [[political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Government mass-surveillance&lt;br /&gt;
* Non-syndicalist [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Many liberals engage in [[racism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2013/03/26/25-examples-of-liberal-racism-in-quotes-n1549044 25 Examples of Liberal Racism in Quotes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;	(see [[liberal racism]] and [[left-wing Anti-Semitism]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal bigotry|Bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Trump Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Advocating incorrect policies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/04/liberals-smug-condescending]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouraging promiscuity and immorality through sexual education rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from premarital sex&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it is thought to have been intended.&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Slander&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/Slander-Liberal-About-American-Right/dp/1400049520&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (see [[Liberal Smear Machine]] and [[Politics of personal destruction]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Third- and fourth-wave [[feminism]], [[gender confusion]], and [[anti-family]] policies&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Americanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the [[death penalty]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;and environmental organizations, for example [[Greenpeace]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including the [[Green New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]], [[one-world government]], and opposition to national [[sovereignty]] (see also: [[War on Sovereignty]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Lack of [[patriotism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bleau, Hannah (July 4, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/04/round-up-democrats-reveal-they-dislike-celebrating-america-after-all/ Round-Up: Democrats Reveal They Dislike Celebrating America After All]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 4, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (July 4, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/32780-lack-of-pride-in-america-not-surprising-after-years-of-liberal-propaganda Lack of Pride in America Not Surprising After Years of Liberal Propaganda]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 4, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Wiping out national identity, which unites a country and makes it distinct from other countries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kraychik, Robert (July 24, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/07/24/dennis-prager-leftists-dont-believe-in-national-identities/ Dennis Prager: Leftists ‘Don’t Believe in National Identities’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[open borders]] with no border controls or [[border wall]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[amnesty]] for illegals, and for [[Voter fraud|non-citizens voting in U.S. elections]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murphy, James (July 27, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/29650-liberal-cities-want-voting-rights-for-non-citizens-even-illegal-ones Liberal Cities Want Voting Rights for Non-Citizens — Even Illegal Ones]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 28, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, Stephen (October 18, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/18/texas-democrats-ask-noncitizens-register-vote/ Texas Dems ask noncitizens to register to vote, send applications with citizenship box pre-checked]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved October 18, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Unconstitutionally mandated separation of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full [[private property]] rights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5–4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstatement of the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for the [[Welfare State]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Oppression of business rather than a laissez-faire capitalist economy &lt;br /&gt;
* American liberals often have opposition to the U.S. Constitution and/or are often ignorant of what the U.S. Constitution states. Liberals seek to expand federal power at the expense of local government and silence the conservatives who hold them back, violating the 10th and 1st Amendments respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Denial|Denial]] of traditional [[gender roles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of financially irresponsible policies&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouragement of [[Global Warming|&amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; alarmism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rejection of logical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pjstar.com/article/20140711/OPINION/140719804/2011/OPINION Liberals are illogical, and good at it]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; standards&lt;br /&gt;
* Attacking people for acting decently merely because they personally don't like them, often smearing them of only seeking attention&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Some liberals support:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* High tolerance of government corruption as long as it is done by other liberals &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.infowars.com/correction-liberals-not-conservatives-are-psychotic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tyranny]] to varying degrees.  In lesser forms, a [[Nanny State]] is preferred&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.history.com/topics/british-history/george-iii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elitism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130604122602AANvhvF&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Liberal elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Treason]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://crooksandliars.com/2016/07/mikes-blog-round-25&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Semitism]] (strong support for &amp;quot;[[Palestine]]&amp;quot;, opposition to the state of [[Israel]], and even [[Holocaust denial]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Genocide]] and [[eugenics]] in the form of [[abortion]] (see [[Abortion and eugenics]] and [[Margaret Sanger]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Enforced celebration of homosexuality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://letterstotheeditorblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/weve-gone-from-tolerance-of-homosexuality-to-forced-celebration-of-it.html/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Pedophilia&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/liberals-hard-pressed-make-pedophilia-legal-get-ready-sharia-law/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Bestiality as a human right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.peterheck.com/libtree/liberty_tree/view/1677/liberals_repeal_ban_on_bestiality_in_the_military Liberals Repeal Ban on Bestiality in the Military]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sadism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://catholiccitizens.org/views/66534/uses-disgust-%E2%80%A8%E2%80%A8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Obesity]] via the [[Fat acceptance movement]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/rosie-odonnell-said-she-will-leave-america-youll-love-the-reason/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Robbery and other forms of crime (see [[Gun control]])&lt;br /&gt;
* A strong tendency to ban or censor things they do not like and make things they like compulsory – in other words, having the government control everything.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/multimedia/collection/13-things-liberals-want-to-ban/ 13 Things Liberals Want To Ban]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 29, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Crowder, Steven (June 24, 2015). [https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/top-10-things-liberals-want-to-ban/ Top 10 Things Liberals Want to Ban]. ''Louder with Crowder''. Retrieved November 29, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Clayson, Dennis (May 16, 2018). [https://wcfcourier.com/news/opinion/clayson/if-liberals-don-t-like-it-they-ban-it/article_8ef54d06-5f65-11df-9f06-001cc4c002e0.html If liberals don't like it, they ban it]. ''The Courier''. Retrieved November 29, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Death-camps-trump-supporters.jpg|thumb|right|220px|Liberalism in 2019 America: &amp;quot;Death Camps for Trump Supporters Now!&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal intolerance ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Liberal intolerance]] and [[Liberal bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
Many modern liberals have a tendency of to be intolerant of ideas that contradict [[liberalism|liberal ideology]] which increasingly includes many strange notions&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (August 8, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/29740-the-growing-intolerance-of-the-left The Growing Intolerance of the Left]. ''The New American''. Retrieved August 8, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (see: [[Liberal intolerance]]). For example, radical [[feminism|feminists]] commonly claim that one is not born a man or woman, but one becomes a man or woman through [[gender]] socialization.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-gender/#GenSocCon - Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender - Gender socialization], Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Pew Research study found that “consistent liberals” were most likely to block others on [[social media]] for disagreeing with them politically.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://hotair.com/archives/2014/10/21/pew-survey-consistent-liberals-most-likely-to-block-others-on-social-media-for-disagreeing-with-them-politically/ Pew survey: “Consistent liberals” most likely to block others on social media for disagreeing with them politically]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Coulter2006.jpg|thumb|left|180px|Leftists prevented Ann Coulter from speaking at [[University of California, Berkeley]] through threats of violence.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;foxnews.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/26/ann-coulter-cancels-berkeley-event-amid-protests.html Ann Coulter cancels Berkeley event amid protests, says decision 'a dark day for free speech in America'], Fox News, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberal intolerance and violence ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Left-wing violence in the Trump era}}&lt;br /&gt;
As noted above, may liberals are increasingly attempting to limit free speech.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;The slow death of free speech&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtonexaminer.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  For example, there have been several intolerant, liberal mobs which have shut down conservative speakers at college campuses (in 2017, there were two cases in the United States where violence or threats of violence were used to shut down free speech at college campuses).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;foxnews.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediaite.com/online/left-wing-hooliganism-wins-again-over-free-speech/ Intolerant Far-Left Mob Wins Again Over Free Speech, This Time at Berkeley], Mediaite, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/24/opinions/ann-coulter-berkeley-free-speech-randazza-opinion/ Dear Berkeley: Even Ann Coulter deserves free speech], CNN, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] used paid leftists agitators to disrupt [[Donald Trump]] rallies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtontimes.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/18/undercover-video-shows-democrats-saying-they-hire-/ Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies], ''Washington Times'', 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264543/undercover-video-democrats-caused-violence-trump-matthew-vadum UNDERCOVER VIDEO: DEMOCRATS CAUSED VIOLENCE AT TRUMP RALLIES], Frontpage Magazine, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As far as the paid agitators, veteran left-wing strategist Robert Creamer confirmed on hidden camera that [[Hillary Clinton]] “is fully in it” and  “Hillary knows through the chain of command what’s going on.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  The agitators were sent to Trump rallies to anger Trump supporters and incite violence.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtontimes.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have been a number of attacks against President Donald Trump supporters after his election which the [[mainstream media]] underreported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2016/11/17/heres-a-list-of-completely-substantiated-and-underreported-attacks-on-trump-supporters/ Here’s A List Of Completely Substantiated (And Underreported) Attacks On Trump Supporters], Daily Caller, 11/17/2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, there have been a number of instances of leftists and Trump supporters clashing at Trump rallies after his election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3014061/violence-donald-trump-supporters-clash-rallies/ 'CIVIL WAR' Violence erupts as hundreds of Donald Trump supporters clash with rivals at US rallies], The Sun, March 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberals and politics/law ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ObamaCareSymbol.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Forced collectivization of healthcare.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, liberals currently use two Clauses of the U.S. Constitution to try to expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause. The General Welfare Clause mentions &amp;quot;promoting the general welfare&amp;quot;. This to a liberal means taxing the rich at increased rates and redistributing that money.  The Commerce Clause, on the other hand, says that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign nations, between the states and with the Indian tribes. Since the days of [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] this clause has been interpreted very loosely and has resulted in the federal government expanding its power. The latest example is The Affordable Care Act (ACA), better known as [[Obamacare]]. In the ACA, the liberals justify the [[individual mandate]] by saying it regulates commerce between the states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decline in liberal principles can be illustrated by how Franklin Delano Roosevelt opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred from the private to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties.  Yet today, decades later, [[Democrats]] and liberals are in lock-step with public sector unions, as they &amp;quot;donate&amp;quot; money to the reelection campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current dictionaries describe the liberal ideology by pretending that a liberal is &amp;quot;a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=liberal&amp;amp;sub=Search+WordNet&amp;amp;o2=&amp;amp;o0=1&amp;amp;o7=&amp;amp;o5=&amp;amp;o1=1&amp;amp;o6=&amp;amp;o4=&amp;amp;o3=&amp;amp;h=00 Noun S: (n) liberal]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or &amp;quot;open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal liberal]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In practical usage, the term &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; is more closely synonymous with &amp;quot;radical,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;immoral,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;anti-freedom,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;elitist,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;bad.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Krdo13.jpg|thumbnail|250px|left|An [[Obamaville]] was a tent city or shanty town in the [[United States]] created by homeless people during [[Barack Hussein Obama|Barack Obama]]'s presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wnd.com/?pageId=174965&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.staradvertiser.com/news/20100627_Huge_tent_city_takes_root.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/12/12/welcome-obamaville-sign-colorado-tent-city-media-mum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[United States|American]] liberals have been observed to give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref name=georgeWill&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html Conservatives More Liberal Givers], [[RealClearPolitics]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''See also'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]] and [[Atheism and charity]]&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, [[Arthur C. Brooks]], a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref name=georgeWill /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians Atheists and Agnostics Take Aim at Christians]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ===&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] exposing the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1 Charity Donations and Liberal Hypocrisy]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his lack of charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Irreligion and superstition]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|170px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows ...that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to [[superstition]], tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in [[pseudoscience]] than evangelical Christians.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]].&amp;lt;ref name=irrational&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html Look Who's Irrational Now]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith &amp;amp;mdash; it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience, such as evolution than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref name=irrational /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Secular left ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Secular left]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[secular left]] consists of [[leftist|left]]-wing secularists who are able to exert their influence in many countries.  They support &amp;quot;strict government [[secularism]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.secularleft.us/about&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Decline of the secular left ===&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Decline of the secular left]] and [[Religious conservatism and politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some regions where the secular left has considerable influence, they [[Decline of the secular left|are losing]] an increasing amount of their power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious conservatism is a big driver of [[social conservatism]].  Religious conservatism is growing in the world and it is affecting politics (see: [[Religious conservatism and politics]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/1-Shall%20the%20Religious%20Inherit%20the%20Earth.pdf Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7vCDeKPRSo Eric Kaufmann - Religion, Demography and Politics in the 21st Century]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]] and [[Liberal Christianity]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a 2007 study reported in the ''Journal of Family Issues'', adherents of [[liberal Christianity]] are more likely to engage in marital infidelity than theologically [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sagepub.com/hillhsstudy/articles/Chapter10_Article%2001.pdf Are There Religious Variations in Marital Infidelity?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted above, liberals are [[Evolution and liberalism|more likely]] to adhere to evolutionary belief than conservatives. A study conducted by the Australian National University, revealed that belief in evolution is associated with moral permissiveness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://creation.com/morals-decline-linked-to-belief-in-evolution Morals decline linked to evolution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== American liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[American liberalism]] and [[Liberal elite|Liberal elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
As noted above, [[American liberalism]] is a political ideology that dominates the [[Democratic Party]]. Its heroes include [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]], [[Eleanor Roosevelt]], and [[Martin Luther King]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Gallup Organization, in the United States,  25% of the population were liberals and 36% were conservatives in 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin], Gallup, January of 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDRoosevelt by Perskie.png|thumbnail|right|200px|[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 2017, the ''Financial Times'' declared about [[American liberalism]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|...as Democrats struggle to reinvent themselves in the wake of Donald Trump’s victory, their party remains captured by a toxic mix of [[identity politics]] and corporate interests. The establishment wing is still convinced that racism and [[misogyny]], not economic populism, sank Mrs Clinton, and that wooing big corporate donors is still the way to victory in the next election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While money matters, and there may have been some voters who turned away from Mrs Clinton because of gender, the key reason that the Democrats lost in 2016 and are struggling to rebrand themselves is that they have failed to grasp two things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, most Americans today care more about jobs than identity, and secondly, the same downward mobility that pushed the white working class towards Mr Trump is moving up the socio-economic food chain, and fast. As research by groups from the International Monetary Fund to the OECD to McKinsey has shown, the technology-related job disruption that resulted in rust belt job losses and wage stagnation since 2000 is beginning to affect white-collar workers across nearly every sector....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Democrats over-estimated the power and relevance of identity politics (there are still more whites without a college degree than minorities), and underestimated the breadth and depth of labour disruption. In any case, says Robert Johnson, president of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, “it was always a mistake to separate out issues of race and class, because they go hand in hand. In economically insecure times, fear of the ‘other’ increases.” It is a phenomenon exploited by Mr Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.ft.com/content/b34f5536-2c02-11e7-bc4b-5528796fe35c Economics, not identity, is key to reviving American liberalism], Financial Times, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, American liberals have experienced a number of political losses and many liberals in the United States have become embittered (see: [[American liberalism and 21st century political losses]]),  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly liberal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=[[Media Research Center]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three liberal tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: SIN. Liberals (1) '''s'''hift the subject, they (2) '''i'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''n'''ame call.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott Baker. [https://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[YouTube]]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A&amp;amp; Herman Cain: &amp;quot;Stupid People Are Ruining America&amp;quot;], February 11, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals typically support a &amp;quot;mixed&amp;quot; economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [https://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm How the House voted]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== American liberalism, demographics and expected tipping point in the decline of American liberalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[American atheism]] and [[Decline of atheism]] and [[Global atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] in traditional cultures and their influence on Western [[Christianity]] and the higher birth rate of [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]] and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book ''Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth?'' concerning America:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will to tip the balance in the [[Culture War|culture wars]] towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as abortion. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/why-are-years-2012-and-2020-key-years.html Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Francois Hollande and Vladimir Putin, Moscow 6 dec 2014 - 05-cropped.jpg|thumb|left|200px|The [[France|French]] liberal politician [[François Hollande]]  was the President of the French Republic from 2012 until 2017. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alde.eu Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe in the European Parliament]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal-international.org/ World Federation of Liberalism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/ Liberal Party of Australia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal]]s. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of both European [[socialist]]/[[social democracy|social democratic]] or Social/progressive liberal parties, in contrast to conservative or fiscal liberal parties which again falls into the right-wing part of the political spectrum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org Party of European Socialism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:JohnStuartMill.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px||[[John Stuart Mill]] was a [[classical liberal]]. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of [[national security]] and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf Parental Selection of Children’s Sexual Orientation], '''PDF''', &amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Original meaning: Classical Liberalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and traditions derived from Northern European Protestantism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal]]ism. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Influential/famous liberals  ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ocasio Cortez.jpeg|thumb|250px|[[AOC]] ]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Hussein Obama]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.businessinsider.com/cheney-obama-is-the-worst-president-of-my-lifetime-2014-7 CHENEY: Obama Is 'The Worst President Of My Lifetime']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elizabeth Warren]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Soros]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Emmanuel Macron]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Saul Alinsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Noam Chomsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Maynard Keynes]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Thorstad]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hunterbear.org/shooting_lupus.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a founding member of NAMBLA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pope Francis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lee Harvey Oswald]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Howard Zinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Albert Einstein]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Nye]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=YDyGCgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT129 John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster], Transcript&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=YDyGCgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT20 John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster], Transcript&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gacy was also a [[Democrat Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527 Johnwaynegacyrosalynncarter.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gene Roddenberry]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations of thought==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Margaret Sanger and Charles V. Drysdale cph.3b18067.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|[[Margaret Sanger]] was the founder of [[Planned Parenthood]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.|ANSWER - Act Now to Stop War and End Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CAIR|CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women|NOW - National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PETA|PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEIU|SEIU - Service Employees International Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [https://web.archive.org/web/20060509044946/http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes on Liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I never use the words [[Democrats]] and [[Republicans]]. It's [[liberals]] and [[Americans]].&amp;quot; -James Watt, Secretary of the Interior under [[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.&amp;quot; -[[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Liberals see racism where it doesn't exist, fabricate it when they can't find it and ignore it within their own ranks.” ―[[Michelle Malkin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Words mean nothing to liberals. They say whatever will help advance their cause at the moment, switch talking points in a heartbeat, and then act indignant if anyone uses the exact same argument they were using five minutes ago.&amp;quot; -[[Ann Coulter]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2010/11/23/the_25_best_quotes_about_liberals The 25 Best Quotes About Liberals]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The reason any conservative's failing is always major news is that it allows liberals to engage in their very favorite taunt: Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy is the only sin that really inflames them. Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce. It's an intriguing strategy. By openly admitting to being philanderers, draft dodgers, liars, weasels and cowards, liberals avoid ever being hypocrites.&amp;quot; -Ann Coulter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can somehow force a liberal into a point-counterpoint argument, his retorts will bear no relation to what you've said -- unless you were in fact talking about your looks, your age, your weight, your personal obsessions, or whether you are a fascist. In the famous liberal two-step, they leap from one idiotic point to the next, so you can never nail them. It's like arguing with someone with Attention Deficit Disorder.&amp;quot; -[[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Inside many liberals is a totalitarian screaming to get out. They don't like to have another point of view in the room that they don't squash and the way they try to squash it is by character assassination and name calling.&amp;quot; -David Horowitz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;End results that work that don't involve government threaten liberals.&amp;quot; -[[Rush Limbaugh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I'd like to know why well-educated idiots keep apologizing for lazy and complaining people who think the world owes them a living. I'd like to know why they make excuses for cowards who spit in the faces of the police and then run behind the judicial sob sisters. I can't understand these people who carry placards to save the life of some criminal, yet have no thought for the innocent victim.&amp;quot; -John Wayne&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes by Liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The number one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S.&amp;quot; -[[Joe Biden]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There is no reason the nation of Africa cannot, and should not, join the ranks of the worlds most prosperous nations.&amp;quot; -Joe Biden&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.facebook.com/StupidStuffDemocratsSay Stupid Stuff Democrats Say]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Romney wants to give EIGHT HUNDRED MILLION BILLION in tax breaks to the rich.&amp;quot; -Joe Biden&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Will the Mars Rover be able to show the flag the astronauts planted there before?&amp;quot; -Sheila Jackson Lee &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ytr7576.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|[[Nancy Pelosi]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Isn't it a little racist to call it Black Friday?&amp;quot; -Joy Behar &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Is there such a thing as a man-made stroke? …I know what this [Republican] party is capable of.&amp;quot; -Joy Behar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.&amp;quot; -[[Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The center of the earth is about a million degrees.&amp;quot; -Al Gore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A zebra does not change its spots.&amp;quot; -Al Gore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied.&amp;quot; -[[Jeremiah Wright]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Every month that we do not have an economic recovery package 500 million Americans lose their jobs.&amp;quot; -[[Nancy Pelosi]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My favorite word, that is really easy, my favorite word is 'the word'.&amp;quot; -Nancy Pelosi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it” - Nancy Pelosi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Why can't I just eat my waffle?&amp;quot; -[[Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go.&amp;quot; -[[Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Welcome to Cinco de Quattro!&amp;quot; -Barack Obama&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The time has changed for come.&amp;quot; -Barack Obama&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;They support democratic institutions in Kyrzakhstan&amp;quot; -John Kerry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My fear is that the whole island (of Guam) will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize.&amp;quot; -Democrat Congressman Hank Johnson&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2013/08/17/the-25-stupidest-liberal-quotes-of-the-last-decade-n1666619 The 25 Stupidest Liberal Quotes Of The Last Decade]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.&amp;quot; -Obama foreign policy adviser Richard Danzig&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you take out the killings, Washington actually has a very very low crime rate.&amp;quot; -Former D.C. Mayor Marion Barry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservative.wikia.com/wiki/Hilarious_Liberal_Quotes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What right does Congress have to go around making laws just because they deem it necessary?&amp;quot; -Marion Barry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My appetite is so good that I can eat the table cloth right off the chair.&amp;quot; -Democrat Congressman Joe Moakley &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Those who died in the earthquake, their lives will never be the same again.&amp;quot; -Barbara Boxer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I have to march because my mother couldn't have an abortion.&amp;quot; -Maxine Water&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.azquotes.com/quote/687234&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I dare you, you little fruitcake!&amp;quot; -Democrat Congressman Pete Stark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I root for hurricanes&amp;quot; -James Wolcott&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I've got a secret for you: Kiss my a**.&amp;quot; -George McGovern&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.&amp;quot; -[[Norman Thomas]], six-time U.S. Presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Norman.Thomas.Quote.FFB1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.&amp;quot; -Hillary Rodham Clinton&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hawkins, John (June 16, 2015). [https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2015/06/16/draft-n2012995 20 Hillary Clinton Quotes You Should Read Before Voting For Her]. ''Townhall''. Retrieved May 16, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Reagan will raise taxes, and so will I. He won't tell you. I just did.&amp;quot; -Walter Mondale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Modern liberalism and the use of mockery rather than reasonable argumentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and mockery]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a ''BloombergView'' article, Stephen L. Carter wrote about modern liberalism:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But the left has work to do, not only on policy and organization but also on attitude. Too many of my [[progressivism|progressive]] friends seem to have forgotten how to make actual arguments, and have become expert instead at condemnation, derision and mockery. On issue after issue, they’re very good at explaining why no one could oppose their policy positions except for the basest of motives. As to those positions themselves, they are too often announced with a zealous solemnity suggesting that their views are Holy Writ -- and those who disagree are cast into the outer political darkness. In short, the left has lately been dripping with hubris, which in classic literature always portends a fall.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-11-11/trump-and-the-fall-of-liberalism Trump and the Fall of Liberalism] by Stephen L. Carter, BloombergView&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal influence in extreme ideologies (and vice-versa) ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism|Communism and Nazism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the following individuals were not liberals, they shared several left-wing/liberal views in their ideologies, which overlapped with American/European liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Marxist/communist figures ===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Marx]]—opposed religion and supported taking it completely out of public life; supported the disestablishment of the family; strong support for labor, socialism, and an expansive government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Communist Manifesto''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Admired by many liberals,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Dedaj, Paulina (May 5, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/05/05/moviemaker-michael-moore-wishes-karl-marx-happy-200th-birthday.html Moviemaker Michael Moore wishes Karl Marx a happy 200th birthday]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Duke, Selwyn (May 2, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/28951-ny-times-hails-marx-on-his-birthday-you-were-right New York Times Hails Marx on His Birthday: “You Were Right!”] ''The New American''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Sunkara, Bhaskar (January 25, 2013). [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jan/25/karl-marx-relevant-21st-century Why the ideas of Karl Marx are more relevant than ever in the 21st century]. ''The Guardian''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cooper, Ryan (May 4, 2018). [http://theweek.com/articles/770718/time-normalize-karl-marx It's time to normalize Karl Marx]. ''The Week''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including [[European Commission]] president [[Jean-Claude Juncker]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Hale, Virginia (May 5, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/05/05/eu-president-heartfelt-defence-karl-marx/ EU Chief Jean-Claude Juncker Defies Protests to Deliver Heartfelt Defence of Karl Marx]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (May 5, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/28979-european-commission-president-praises-karl-marx-s-contributions-to-european-union European Commission President Praises Karl Marx’s Contributions to European Union]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (April 29, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/28934-eu-commission-president-juncker-set-to-honor-karl-marx European Commission President Juncker Set to Honor Karl Marx]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vladimir Lenin]]—socialist, supported an expansive government, supported [[one-world government]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mao Zedong]]—socialist. Introduced [[Maoism]], some American liberals admire him&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shapiro, Ben (October 17, 2012). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/10/17/obama-debate-advisor-anita-dunn-mao/ Obama Debate Coach Named Mao as Favorite Political Philosopher]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin]]—socialist. Introduced [[Stalinism]], admired by many (European-) socialists/liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.tni.org/es/node/7617&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fidel Castro]]—socialist, opposition to religion, government-run healthcare. In addition, Castro is admired by numerous American/European liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wootson, Cleve R., Jr. (November 26, 2016). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/11/26/trudeau-called-castro-a-remarkable-leader-twitter-imagined-what-he-would-say-about-stalin/?tid=pm_world_pop Trudeau called Castro a ‘remarkable leader.’ Twitter imagined what he would say about Stalin.] ''The Washington Post''. Retrieved November 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Jeremy (November 26, 2016). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jill-stein-praises-fidel-castro-a-symbol-of-the-struggle-for-justice/article/2608223 Jill Stein praises Fidel Castro: 'A symbol of the struggle for justice']. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved November 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richardson, Valerie (November 28, 2016). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/28/aaron-mair-sierra-club-president-fidel-castro-had-/ Sierra Club president: Fidel Castro had ‘more honor’ than Donald Trump]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;O'ReillyNov.29.2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.billoreilly.com/show?action=viewTVShow&amp;amp;showID=4323#3 The O'Reilly Factor - Monday, November 28, 2016]. ''billoreilly.com''. Retrieved November 29, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hugo Chavez]]—socialist. Admired by many American/European liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kew, Ben (May 4, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/05/04/ten-influential-public-figures-praised-venezuelas-descent-socialist-hell/ 10 Famous People Who Praised Venezuela’s Descent Into Socialist Hell]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 5, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Che Guevara]]—socialist, admired by many liberals&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/05/illegal-immigrants-rally-in-support-of.html Illegal Immigrants Rally For Dead Marxist Che Guevara]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.che-mart.com/WhoisChe.php Che-Mart]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones, Nigel (January 2, 2009). [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/4077397/It-is-a-sad-reflection-of-our-time-that-Che-Guevara-is-seen-as-a-hero.html It is a sad reflection of our time that Che Guevara is seen as a hero] ''The Telegraph''. Retrieved April 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Che_Guevara_in_popular_culture&amp;amp;oldid=833775290&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reiland, Ralph R. (August 12, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/29769-che-guevara-romanticizing-tyranny Che Guevara: Romanticizing Tyranny]. ''The New American''. Retrieved August 12, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bernie Sanders]]-socialist.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]]-socialist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2019, several members of the [[European Commission]] sang the far-left Marxist song &amp;quot;Bella Ciao.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tomlinson, Chris (December 5, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/12/05/leftist-european-commissioners-slammed-singing-far-left-bella-ciao/ EU Commissioners Slammed for Singing Marxist Anthem ‘Bella Ciao’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Fascists ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also:'' [[Liberalism#Nazism and socialism|Nazism and socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adolf Hitler]]—supported animal &amp;quot;rights,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ https://books.google.com/books?id=e7FME0btkH0C&amp;amp;pg=PA62&amp;amp;lpg=PA62&amp;amp;dq=hitler+animal+rights&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=PIxjDRDBj1&amp;amp;sig=tbJisPm39hMcxj1g6xL0Kh0sn7g&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwi3qZP7xOPTAhVr4oMKHeTMA_c4FBDoAQhKMAc#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=hitler%20animal%20rights&amp;amp;f=false Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions], pg. 62.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harrison, David; Paterson, Tony (September 22, 2002). [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1407954/Thanks-to-Hitler-hunting-with-hounds-is-still-verboten.html Thanks to Hitler, hunting with hounds is still verboten]. ''The Telegraph''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EllisWash.&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; environmentalism,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EllisWash.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Washington, Ellis (March 26, 2011). [https://www.wnd.com/2011/03/279449/ The Nazi Cult of the Organic']. ''WND''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/ecology/nazi_ecology.htm Nazi &amp;quot;Ecology&amp;quot;], Frank Furedi, ''columbia.edu''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Musser, Mark (February 6, 2016). [https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/yale_professor_on_nazi_environmentalism_so_close_yet_so_far.html Yale Professor on Nazi Environmentalism: So Close, yet So Far]. ''American Thinker''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; gun control (see [[Gun Control in Nazi Germany]]),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halbrook, Stephen (December 2, 2013). [https://www.nationalreview.com/2013/12/how-nazis-used-gun-control-stephen-p-halbrook/ How the Nazis Used Gun Control]. ''National Review''. Retrieved March 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kline, Audrey D. (May 9, 2014). [https://mises.org/library/gun-control-nazi-germany Gun Control in Nazi Germany]. ''Mises Institute''. Retrieved March 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wolverton, II, J.D., Joe (January 30, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/14367-nazi-gun-control-laws-a-familiar-road-to-citizen-disarmament Nazi Gun Control Laws: a Familiar Road to Citizen Disarmament?] ''The New American''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stupp, Herbert W. (July 13, 2015). [https://spectator.org/63424_hitler-and-gun-control/ Hitler and Gun Control]. ''The American Spectator''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hoft, Joe (March 24, 2018). [https://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/reminder-hitler-also-used-children-to-promote-gun-control/ FLASHBACK: Hitler Also Used Children to Promote Gun Control]. ''The Gateway Pundit''. Retrieved March 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; socialism,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://louderwithcrowder.com/myth-busted-actually-yes-hitler-was-a-socialist-liberal/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; single-payer healthcare (see [[Health care in Nazi Germany]]), and a large expansionist government, and had an intolerance for opposing views.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benito Mussolini]]—a socialist from a socialist family who only split from mainstream socialism due to his support for Italy during [[World War I]] rather than supporting a [[one-world government|globalist workers' revolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/people/benito-mussolini-9419443 Benito Mussolini]. ''Biography.com''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/italian-history-biographies/benito-mussolini Benito Mussolini]. ''Encyclopedia.com'' (from the Encyclopedia of World Biography''). 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prior to [[World War I]], Mussolini wrote for socialist publications and spoke highly of Marx.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greenspan, Jesse (October 25, 2012). [http://www.history.com/news/9-things-you-may-not-know-about-mussolini 9 Things You May Not Know About Mussolini]. ''History.com''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He used gun control to help gain power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quammen, E. David (August 12, 2013). [http://www.teapartytribune.com/2013/08/12/italian-gun-control-right-before-mussolini-seized-total-control/ Italian ‘gun control’ right before Mussolini seized total control….]. ''Tea Party Tribune''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative vs. liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal corporate tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Left-wing war on women]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
{|background=&amp;quot;none&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]] tendencies. &lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scientific Illiteracy and Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[European Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal and conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal anger]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal competitiveness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal concealment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal conscience]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal dislikes]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal excuses]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal fear]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal gossip]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal guilt]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal confusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hedonism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hyperbole]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal infiltration]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal media hype]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal opinion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal revisionists]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal self-righteousness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism-ism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberals and conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intelligence]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Incoherence of liberal thought]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Predictions of the Decade]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Best New Conservative Words#New Liberal Terms|New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs/&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/c-how-the-specter-of-communism-is-ruling-our-world How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World]. ''The Epoch Times''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Darth Umbris</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=1718558</id>
		<title>Liberal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberal&amp;diff=1718558"/>
		<updated>2021-01-04T23:20:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Darth Umbris: Adding that Classical Liberalism is a PURPORTED aspect of Conservatism. It's not, but it is being labeled as such by the Left.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Elizabeth Warren 2016 DNC cropped.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|[[Elizabeth Warren]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
A '''liberal''' (alternately called a left-winger or [[leftism|leftist]]) is someone who advocates an increase in [[government]] spending, power, and control, such as [[ObamaCare]]. Liberals often support the [[censorship]] and [[denial]] of biblical [[Christianity]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (March 18, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/faith-and-morals/item/31774-horowitz-american-left-is-at-war-with-christianity Horowitz: American Left Is at War With Christianity]. ''The New American''. Retrieved March 18, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.worldviewweekend.com/worldview-times/article.php?articleid=2062&lt;br /&gt;
*Anderson, Troy (June 4, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/32393-the-war-to-destroy-christianity-in-america The War to Destroy Christianity in America]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 4, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dreher, Rod (October 14, 2019). [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/democrats-versus-traditional-christians-beto-orourke-elizabeth-warren/ Democrats Vs. Traditional Christians]. ''The American Conservative''. Retrieved October 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dreher, Rod (October 11, 2019). [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/beto-vs-religious-liberty/ Beto Vs. Religious Liberty]. ''The American Conservative''. Retrieved October 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Scaliger, Charles (December 26, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/34255-the-left-s-abc-anything-but-christianity-syndrome The Left’s “ABC” (“Anything But Christianity”) Syndrome]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 26, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and consistently [[conservative]] viewpoints. Liberals who are a part of the [[secular left]] prefer [[atheism]]/[[agnosticism]] over the Christian [[faith]], as [[atheism]] has no objective morality to hinder their big government plans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/232212/fox-contributor-claims-rolling-stone-uva-story-part-of-liberal-plot-to-romanticize-being-a-victim-of-rape/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Increasingly, liberals side with the [[homosexual agenda]], including [[same-sex marriage|homosexual &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]].  Liberals favor a [[welfare state]] where people receive endless entitlements without working.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2014/05/23/reform-conservatives-tackle-the-failed-liberal-welfare-state/ Reform conservatives tackle the failed liberal welfare state], [[Washington Post]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The liberal ideology has degenerated into economically unsound views and [[Liberal bigotry|intolerant ideology]]. All liberals support, in knee-jerk fashion, the opposite of [[conservative]] principles, while lacking an actual ideology or values of their own.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://eaglerising.com/22901/liberal-crybabies-get-offended-by-caitlyn-jenner-costume/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Secular left|Many of them]] [[Secularized Language|cannot understand]] Christian language.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, Thomas D., Ph.D. (December 26, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/26/religiously-ignorant-liberals-mistake-new-king-at-christmas-for-donald-trump/ Religiously-Ignorant Liberals Mistake ‘New King’ at Christmas for Donald Trump]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved December 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberals are especially prone to believe [[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]], particularly those that denigrate people or views they disagree with,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murdock, Deroy (March 29, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/03/collusion-clingers-and-their-flat-earth-forebears/ Collusion Clingers and Their Flat-Earth Forebears]. ''National Review''. Retrieved March 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://video.foxnews.com/v/6020444417001/?playlist_id=5198073478001#sp=show-clips Tucker: Brennan and Comey disgraced themselves]. ''Fox News Video''. March 29, 2019. Retrieved March 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and they are [[Liberal intolerance|increasingly intolerant]] of opposing viewpoints.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Folks, Jeffrey (July 30, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/leftists-dont-want-equality-in-america-they-want-revenge Leftists don’t want equality in America. They want revenge.] ''LifeSiteNews'' (from the ''American Thinker''). Retrieved July 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Modern liberals reject [[Classical Liberal|classical liberalism]], which is now a purported aspect of conservatism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vance, Laurence M. (December 27, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/34256-review-of-for-a-new-liberalism Review of “For a New Liberalism”]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 27, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polling data has consistently shown that a larger percentage of Americans identify as conservative, rather than as liberal, by a margin of 35% to 26% as of 2017; while the gap between self-identified conservatives and self-identified liberals has been narrowing in recent years,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://news.gallup.com/poll/225074/conservative-lead-ideology-down-single-digits.aspx Conservative Lead in U.S. Ideology is Down to Single Digits]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; liberals and &amp;quot;progressives&amp;quot; oftentimes falsely claim that liberals outnumber conservatives. Liberals are especially active at secular universities, however.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Maxim (January 18, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/socialism-rising-universities-and-radical-profs-helping-steer-leftward-shift-in-politics Socialism rising: Universities and ‘radical’ profs helping steer leftward shift in politics, critics say]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 18, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political positions and practices of liberals ==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Liberals support the following political positions and practices''':&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://townhall.com/columnists/jonahgoldberg/2014/02/21/liberal-students-have-a-funny-definition-of-diversity-n1798157&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Opposition to [[Natural Law]], [[unalienable rights]], and [[republicanism]], and support for the [[War on Freedom]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Wasting money on ineffective government programs (the significant economic problems in the [[Eurozone]] due to government debt will no doubt increasingly discredit this aspect of liberal ideology and make things more difficult for advocates of liberal economic ideologies)&lt;br /&gt;
*Many liberals are increasingly attempting to limit free speech.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;The slow death of free speech&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/20/suzanne-fields-how-the-liberal-left-is-killing-fre/ The slow death of free speech] by Suzanne Fields, ''Washington Times'', 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtonexaminer.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/why-does-the-left-want-to-suppress-free-speech/article/2532270 Why does the left want to suppress free speech?] by Michael Barone, Washington Examiner, 2013&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Judging people by the color of their skin, rather than the content of their character.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-woke-left-vs-martin-luther-king-jr The woke Left vs. Martin Luther King Jr.], ''[[Washington Examiner]]'', January 20, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*In the [[United States]], the [[Democrat Party]] and liberals have moved so [[far left]] that there are now political figures involved in Democrat politics who are sympathetic to [[Communism]]. For example, [[Anita Dunn]], an American political strategist who served as [[White House]] Communications Director from April through November 2009 in [[Obama Administration]], said that [[Mao Zedong]] was her favorite political philosopher.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/10/17/obama-debate-advisor-anita-dunn-mao/ Obama Debate Coach Named Mao as Favorite Political Philosopher] by [[Ben Shapiro]], Bretbart News, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Bernie Sanders]], a leading candidate in the Democrat Party's 2016 presidential nomination, although he is an adherent of [[social democracy]], he also has a history of involvement with [[Marxism|Marxist]] organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/ Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist], New York Post by [[Paul Sperry]], New York Post,January 16, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.wnd.com/2016/01/is-bernie-sanders-a-communist/ IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST?] by Joseph Farah, WND, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/kenneth-d-ackerman/history-lesson-bernie-san_b_9355082.html History Lesson: Bernie Sanders is no 'Communist,' and 'Democratic Socialists' are as American as Apple Pie], Huffington Post, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sanders shocked his fellow liberals by putting up a [[Soviet Union]] flag in his Senate office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/ Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist], New York Post by Paul Sperry, New York Post, January 16, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1998, the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which was founded by Sanders, had the song ''Red Revolution'' (a song advocating communist revolution) featured on a website that they shared with the Democratic Socialists of America.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
* In 1993, Hugh E. Rodham, father of [[Hillary Clinton]], made the statement about the Democrat Party, which is a party strongly supported by liberals, “Democrats are one step short of Communism.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;constitution.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://constitution.com/democrat-party-overrun-communist/  Before his death in 1993, Hugh E. Rodham, father of Hillary Clinton, made the statement, “Democrats are one step short of Communism.”], Constitution.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1988, the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), after decades of running their own presidential candidates, stopped running presidential candidates because the gap between Democrats and American communists had grown smaller.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;youtube.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pjFfE1MNFk Communists, the Democrat Party and Snopes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2016, the CPUSA urged people not to vote for Donald Trump even if they disliked Hillary Clinton (an indirect endorsement of Clinton).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;youtube.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  Although there are still some very substantial differences between Communists and Democrats/liberals, the line between Communists/Democrats/liberals continues to blur in the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;constitution.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Ironically, the leading Communist country in the world, [[Communist Party of China|Communist China]], has moved farther away from Communism and now has a mixed economy of [[capitalism]] and state owned enterprises.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[China's The Most Viciously Free Market Economy On The Planet Right Now], Forbes, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hillary Clinton.jpg|right|200px|thumb|[[Hillary Clinton]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Denial of science&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.postlibertarian.com/2012/09/why-do-liberals-hate-science/ Why Do Liberals Hate Science?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (especially [[creation science]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Government's ability to solve economic problems&amp;lt;ref name=studentNews&amp;gt;[http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs Conservative vs. Liberal Beliefs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Hypocrisy|Hypocrisy]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002849963/3038298682_real_verse_liberal_hypocrisy_xlarge.png&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* The belief that Islamic terrorism is not a huge threat, and that the main reason for Islamic extremists' hostility towards America is because of bad foreign policy &amp;lt;ref name=studentNews /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Brainwashing voters with propaganda&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hedonism|Hedonism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Taxpayer-funded and state-encouraged [[abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rejection of Biblical standards&lt;br /&gt;
* Naive acceptance of the [[Idea of Progress]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hate|Hatred]] of those they disagree with (see: [[Liberal hate speech]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Murder]] (through [[abortion]], [[infanticide]], [[assisted suicide]], and [[euthanasia]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Censorship]] of people, organizations, and beliefs they disagree with&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/07/watch-what-you-say-the-new-liberal-power-elite-won-t-tolerate-dissent.html Watch What You Say, The New Liberal Power Elite Won’t Tolerate Dissent], [[The Daily Beast]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Socialism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://famguardian.org/subjects/Politics/Articles/Liberals.htm 60 Hard Truths about &amp;quot;Liberals&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Unsuccessful Keynesian economics as opposed to sound free-market economics&lt;br /&gt;
* Crying instead of accepting reality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://liberaltears.net/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Cessation of teacher-led [[prayer]] in classrooms and school/state-sponsored religious events.&lt;br /&gt;
* Ending Western morality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2012/07/13/5_ways_liberalism_destroys_virtue]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gun control]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Pseudo-intellectualism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://eljam.blogspot.com/2005/09/i-hate-pseudo-intellectuals.html I hate pseudo-intellectuals]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Affirmative action&amp;lt;ref name=studentNews /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support and justification of [[pornography]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones, Angela (December 31, 2020). [https://www.salon.com/2020/12/30/the-anti-porn-religious-lobby-just-destroyed-the-livelihoods-of-thousands-of-pornographers/ The anti-porn religious lobby just destroyed the livelihoods of thousands of pornographers]. ''Salon''. Retrieved December 31, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for obscenity, pornography and violence in video games&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The [[Warren Court]], led by '''liberal''' Justices [[William O. Douglas]], [[Hugo Black]], [[Abe Fortas]], [[William Brennan]] and Chief Justice [[Earl Warren]] issued 36 decisions granting [[First Amendment]] rights to obscenity and pornography.  These decisions remain fully supported by liberals today.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* ''De facto'' authoritarian government&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2014/07/liberal_authori.html Liberal Authoritarianism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Authoritarianism|Authoritarian]] mindset&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richarson, Bradford (June 11, 2016). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/11/liberals-not-conservatives-more-likely-possess-psy/ Study from 2012 now corrected to show liberals, not conservatives, more authoritarian]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 29, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Government-funded medical care, such as [[Obamacare]] and &amp;quot;[[Medicare For All]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism|Fascist tendencies]] (see also: [[Homo-fascism]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Strong support for the [[Nanny State]] and [[big government]] policies&lt;br /&gt;
* Government interference into the smallest details of peoples' everyday lives&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Terrell, Rebecca (May 7, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/32100-forced-vaccinations Forced Vaccinations: Is It Time for Big Brother to Become Your Doctor?] ''The New American''. Retrieved May 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Duke, Selwyn (May 8, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/32236-tolerant-big-brother-let-people-drink-smoke-and-eat-red-meat-says-health-minister Tolerant Big Brother: Let People Drink, Smoke, and Eat Red Meat, Says Health Minister]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 8, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Prioritizing social engineering and political correctness in the military over readiness and national security&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chalk, Casey (November 8, 2019). [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/what-is-the-woke-military-really-preparing-us-for/ What is the New ‘Woke’ Military Really Preparing Us For?] ''The American Conservative''. Retrieved November 8, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[evolution and liberalism|Belief in evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Destroying the Christian foundations on which America was built. &lt;br /&gt;
* Destroying conservative family values and replacing them with immoral [[Hollywood values]], such as abortion&lt;br /&gt;
* Brainwashing through government-censored [[public education]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Limiting personal freedom.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://conservative.wikia.com/wiki/Democratic_Party Democratic Party]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal support for gun control is an example of this.&lt;br /&gt;
* High progressive taxes&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ijreview.com/2014/07/157256-course-lower-state-taxes-helps-growth-studys-results-prove/ This Nationwide Study Challenges Everything Liberals Have Told You About Raising Taxes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a form of class warfare against wealthy business owners.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.conservapedia.com/Progressive_taxation Progressive taxation]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Placement of men and women in the same jobs in the [[military]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Slowly eroding the U.S. through [[Progressivism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://americanprogressivism.wordpress.com/ What Is Progressivism?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Legalized [[same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriage&amp;quot;]] and homosexual adoption&lt;br /&gt;
* Failed [[tax and spend]] economics&lt;br /&gt;
* Smearing&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.truthnation.com/trumps-slogan-is-a-throwback-to-reagan-and-liberals-are-furious-make-america-great-again/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Libertine sexual morality (see: [[Evolutionary belief and sexual immorality]] and [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Economic sector regulations&amp;lt;ref name=studentNews /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Denial of conservative roles in history. For example, liberals frequently claim&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.deism.com/washington.htm George Washington and Deism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that George Washington was a deist when he was actually a devout Episcopalian.&lt;br /&gt;
* Spreading of [[political correctness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Government mass-surveillance&lt;br /&gt;
* Non-syndicalist [[labor union]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Many liberals engage in [[racism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2013/03/26/25-examples-of-liberal-racism-in-quotes-n1549044 25 Examples of Liberal Racism in Quotes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;	(see [[liberal racism]] and [[left-wing Anti-Semitism]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal bigotry|Bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Trump Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Advocating incorrect policies&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/04/liberals-smug-condescending]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouraging promiscuity and immorality through sexual education rather than teaching [[abstinence]] from premarital sex&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286671,00.html Democrats Aim To Kill Abstinence-Only Program Funding], [[Fox News]], Monday, June 25, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* A &amp;quot;[[living Constitution]]&amp;quot; that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it is thought to have been intended.&lt;br /&gt;
* Government programs to [[rehabilitate criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Slander&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/Slander-Liberal-About-American-Right/dp/1400049520&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (see [[Liberal Smear Machine]] and [[Politics of personal destruction]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Third- and fourth-wave [[feminism]], [[gender confusion]], and [[anti-family]] policies&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Americanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Abolition of the [[death penalty]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Environmentalism]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;and environmental organizations, for example [[Greenpeace]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including the [[Green New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Globalism]], [[one-world government]], and opposition to national [[sovereignty]] (see also: [[War on Sovereignty]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Lack of [[patriotism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bleau, Hannah (July 4, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/04/round-up-democrats-reveal-they-dislike-celebrating-america-after-all/ Round-Up: Democrats Reveal They Dislike Celebrating America After All]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 4, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (July 4, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/32780-lack-of-pride-in-america-not-surprising-after-years-of-liberal-propaganda Lack of Pride in America Not Surprising After Years of Liberal Propaganda]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 4, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Wiping out national identity, which unites a country and makes it distinct from other countries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kraychik, Robert (July 24, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/07/24/dennis-prager-leftists-dont-believe-in-national-identities/ Dennis Prager: Leftists ‘Don’t Believe in National Identities’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[open borders]] with no border controls or [[border wall]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for [[amnesty]] for illegals, and for [[Voter fraud|non-citizens voting in U.S. elections]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murphy, James (July 27, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/29650-liberal-cities-want-voting-rights-for-non-citizens-even-illegal-ones Liberal Cities Want Voting Rights for Non-Citizens — Even Illegal Ones]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 28, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, Stephen (October 18, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/18/texas-democrats-ask-noncitizens-register-vote/ Texas Dems ask noncitizens to register to vote, send applications with citizenship box pre-checked]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved October 18, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Unconstitutionally mandated separation of church and state.&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to full [[private property]] rights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For example, the liberal wing of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] issued the 5–4 [[Kelo v. City of New London]] decision authorizing the taking of private property by government in order to give the property to another private entity rather than convert it to a public use.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Reinstatement of the [[Fairness Doctrine]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support for the [[Welfare State]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the [[Patriot Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Oppression of business rather than a laissez-faire capitalist economy &lt;br /&gt;
* American liberals often have opposition to the U.S. Constitution and/or are often ignorant of what the U.S. Constitution states. Liberals seek to expand federal power at the expense of local government and silence the conservatives who hold them back, violating the 10th and 1st Amendments respectively.&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Denial|Denial]] of traditional [[gender roles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Support of financially irresponsible policies&lt;br /&gt;
* Encouragement of [[Global Warming|&amp;quot;global warming&amp;quot; alarmism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rejection of logical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pjstar.com/article/20140711/OPINION/140719804/2011/OPINION Liberals are illogical, and good at it]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; standards&lt;br /&gt;
* Attacking people for acting decently merely because they personally don't like them, often smearing them of only seeking attention&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Some liberals support:'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* High tolerance of government corruption as long as it is done by other liberals &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.infowars.com/correction-liberals-not-conservatives-are-psychotic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Tyranny]] to varying degrees.  In lesser forms, a [[Nanny State]] is preferred&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.history.com/topics/british-history/george-iii&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elitism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130604122602AANvhvF&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Liberal elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Treason]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://crooksandliars.com/2016/07/mikes-blog-round-25&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Anti-Semitism]] (strong support for &amp;quot;[[Palestine]]&amp;quot;, opposition to the state of [[Israel]], and even [[Holocaust denial]])&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Genocide]] and [[eugenics]] in the form of [[abortion]] (see [[Abortion and eugenics]] and [[Margaret Sanger]])&lt;br /&gt;
* Enforced celebration of homosexuality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://letterstotheeditorblog.dallasnews.com/2014/04/weve-gone-from-tolerance-of-homosexuality-to-forced-celebration-of-it.html/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Pedophilia&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/liberals-hard-pressed-make-pedophilia-legal-get-ready-sharia-law/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Bestiality as a human right&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.peterheck.com/libtree/liberty_tree/view/1677/liberals_repeal_ban_on_bestiality_in_the_military Liberals Repeal Ban on Bestiality in the Military]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See: [[Liberalism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Sadism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://catholiccitizens.org/views/66534/uses-disgust-%E2%80%A8%E2%80%A8/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Obesity]] via the [[Fat acceptance movement]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/rosie-odonnell-said-she-will-leave-america-youll-love-the-reason/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* Robbery and other forms of crime (see [[Gun control]])&lt;br /&gt;
* A strong tendency to ban or censor things they do not like and make things they like compulsory – in other words, having the government control everything.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/multimedia/collection/13-things-liberals-want-to-ban/ 13 Things Liberals Want To Ban]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 29, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Crowder, Steven (June 24, 2015). [https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/top-10-things-liberals-want-to-ban/ Top 10 Things Liberals Want to Ban]. ''Louder with Crowder''. Retrieved November 29, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Clayson, Dennis (May 16, 2018). [https://wcfcourier.com/news/opinion/clayson/if-liberals-don-t-like-it-they-ban-it/article_8ef54d06-5f65-11df-9f06-001cc4c002e0.html If liberals don't like it, they ban it]. ''The Courier''. Retrieved November 29, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep the insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Death-camps-trump-supporters.jpg|thumb|right|220px|Liberalism in 2019 America: &amp;quot;Death Camps for Trump Supporters Now!&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal intolerance ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Liberal intolerance]] and [[Liberal bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
Many modern liberals have a tendency of to be intolerant of ideas that contradict [[liberalism|liberal ideology]] which increasingly includes many strange notions&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (August 8, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/29740-the-growing-intolerance-of-the-left The Growing Intolerance of the Left]. ''The New American''. Retrieved August 8, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (see: [[Liberal intolerance]]). For example, radical [[feminism|feminists]] commonly claim that one is not born a man or woman, but one becomes a man or woman through [[gender]] socialization.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-gender/#GenSocCon - Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender - Gender socialization], Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Pew Research study found that “consistent liberals” were most likely to block others on [[social media]] for disagreeing with them politically.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://hotair.com/archives/2014/10/21/pew-survey-consistent-liberals-most-likely-to-block-others-on-social-media-for-disagreeing-with-them-politically/ Pew survey: “Consistent liberals” most likely to block others on social media for disagreeing with them politically]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Coulter2006.jpg|thumb|left|180px|Leftists prevented Anne Coulter from speaking at [[University of California, Berkeley]] through threats of violence.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;foxnews.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/04/26/ann-coulter-cancels-berkeley-event-amid-protests.html Ann Coulter cancels Berkeley event amid protests, says decision 'a dark day for free speech in America'], Fox News, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberal intolerance and violence ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Left-wing violence in the Trump era}}&lt;br /&gt;
As noted above, may liberals are increasingly attempting to limit free speech.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;The slow death of free speech&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtonexaminer.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  For example, there have been several intolerant, liberal mobs which have shut down conservative speakers at college campuses (in 2017, there were two cases in the United States where violence or threats of violence were used to shut down free speech at college campuses).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;foxnews.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediaite.com/online/left-wing-hooliganism-wins-again-over-free-speech/ Intolerant Far-Left Mob Wins Again Over Free Speech, This Time at Berkeley], Mediaite, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/24/opinions/ann-coulter-berkeley-free-speech-randazza-opinion/ Dear Berkeley: Even Ann Coulter deserves free speech], CNN, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] used paid leftists agitators to disrupt [[Donald Trump]] rallies.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtontimes.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/18/undercover-video-shows-democrats-saying-they-hire-/ Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies], ''Washington Times'', 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/264543/undercover-video-democrats-caused-violence-trump-matthew-vadum UNDERCOVER VIDEO: DEMOCRATS CAUSED VIOLENCE AT TRUMP RALLIES], Frontpage Magazine, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As far as the paid agitators, veteran left-wing strategist Robert Creamer confirmed on hidden camera that [[Hillary Clinton]] “is fully in it” and  “Hillary knows through the chain of command what’s going on.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  The agitators were sent to Trump rallies to anger Trump supporters and incite violence.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;washingtontimes.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There have been a number of attacks against President Donald Trump supporters after his election which the [[mainstream media]] underreported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2016/11/17/heres-a-list-of-completely-substantiated-and-underreported-attacks-on-trump-supporters/ Here’s A List Of Completely Substantiated (And Underreported) Attacks On Trump Supporters], Daily Caller, 11/17/2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, there have been a number of instances of leftists and Trump supporters clashing at Trump rallies after his election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3014061/violence-donald-trump-supporters-clash-rallies/ 'CIVIL WAR' Violence erupts as hundreds of Donald Trump supporters clash with rivals at US rallies], The Sun, March 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberals and politics/law ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:ObamaCareSymbol.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Forced collectivization of healthcare.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, liberals currently use two Clauses of the U.S. Constitution to try to expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause. The General Welfare Clause mentions &amp;quot;promoting the general welfare&amp;quot;. This to a liberal means taxing the rich at increased rates and redistributing that money.  The Commerce Clause, on the other hand, says that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign nations, between the states and with the Indian tribes. Since the days of [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]] this clause has been interpreted very loosely and has resulted in the federal government expanding its power. The latest example is The Affordable Care Act (ACA), better known as [[Obamacare]]. In the ACA, the liberals justify the [[individual mandate]] by saying it regulates commerce between the states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The decline in liberal principles can be illustrated by how Franklin Delano Roosevelt opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred from the private to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties.  Yet today, decades later, [[Democrats]] and liberals are in lock-step with public sector unions, as they &amp;quot;donate&amp;quot; money to the reelection campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current dictionaries describe the liberal ideology by pretending that a liberal is &amp;quot;a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=liberal&amp;amp;sub=Search+WordNet&amp;amp;o2=&amp;amp;o0=1&amp;amp;o7=&amp;amp;o5=&amp;amp;o1=1&amp;amp;o6=&amp;amp;o4=&amp;amp;o3=&amp;amp;h=00 Noun S: (n) liberal]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or &amp;quot;open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/liberal liberal]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In practical usage, the term &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; is more closely synonymous with &amp;quot;radical,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;immoral,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;anti-freedom,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;elitist,&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;bad.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and uncharitableness==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Krdo13.jpg|thumbnail|250px|left|An [[Obamaville]] was a tent city or shanty town in the [[United States]] created by homeless people during [[Barack Hussein Obama|Barack Obama]]'s presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wnd.com/?pageId=174965&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.staradvertiser.com/news/20100627_Huge_tent_city_takes_root.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/12/12/welcome-obamaville-sign-colorado-tent-city-media-mum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[United States|American]] liberals have been observed to give less to charity than American conservatives.&amp;lt;ref name=georgeWill&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/conservatives_more_liberal_giv.html Conservatives More Liberal Givers], [[RealClearPolitics]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''See also'': [[Liberals and uncharitableness]] and [[Atheism and charity]]&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2008, [[George Will]] wrote at [[RealClearPolitics]] concerning the [[United States]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|Sixteen months ago, [[Arthur C. Brooks]], a professor at [[Syracuse University]], published &amp;quot;Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.&amp;quot; The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than [[conservative]]s....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-- Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood.&amp;lt;ref name=georgeWill /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Atheism|Atheists]] and [[agnosticism|agnostics]] often reject [[Bible|Biblical]] [[morality]] (and therefore [[conservative Christianity]] ) and hold to [[moral relativism]].  Therefore, it is not surprising that [[per capita]] atheists and agnostics in [[United States|America]] [[Atheism and charity|give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/12-faithspirituality/102-atheists-and-agnostics-take-aim-at-christians Atheists and Agnostics Take Aim at Christians]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Liberal politicians and uncharitableness ===&lt;br /&gt;
The political magazine the [[American Spectator]] featured an article which focused on [[liberal politicians and uncharitableness]] exposing the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=1c5_1238044128&amp;amp;c=1 Charity Donations and Liberal Hypocrisy]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, [[Barack Obama]] has been criticized concerning [[Barack Obama and uncharitableness|his lack of charitable giving]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberals and superstition==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Irreligion and superstition]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:2384975035_230a0eac30.jpg‎‎|thumb|right|170px|The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows ...that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to [[superstition]], tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in [[pseudoscience]] than evangelical Christians.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Wall Street Journal]] reported: &amp;quot;A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]].&amp;lt;ref name=irrational&amp;gt;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122178219865054585.html Look Who's Irrational Now]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, in September of 2008, the [[Wall Street Journal]] reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|The reality is that the [[New Atheism|New Atheist]] campaign, by discouraging [[religion]], won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith &amp;amp;mdash; it's what the empirical data tell us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Americans Really Believe,&amp;quot; a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that [[Conservative Christianity|traditional Christian religion]] greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of [[astrology]]. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience, such as evolution than evangelical Christians....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book &amp;quot;The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener,&amp;quot; skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in [[pseudoscience]], cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.&amp;lt;ref name=irrational /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Secular left ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Secular left]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[secular left]] consists of [[leftist|left]]-wing secularists who are able to exert their influence in many countries.  They support &amp;quot;strict government [[secularism]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.secularleft.us/about&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Decline of the secular left ===&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Decline of the secular left]] and [[Religious conservatism and politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In some regions where the secular left has considerable influence, they [[Decline of the secular left|are losing]] an increasing amount of their power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious conservatism is a big driver of [[social conservatism]].  Religious conservatism is growing in the world and it is affecting politics (see: [[Religious conservatism and politics]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.sneps.net/RD/uploads/1-Shall%20the%20Religious%20Inherit%20the%20Earth.pdf Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century by Eric Kaufmann, Belfer Center, Harvard University/Birkbeck College, University of London]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7vCDeKPRSo Eric Kaufmann - Religion, Demography and Politics in the 21st Century]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==  Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]] and [[Liberal Christianity]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a 2007 study reported in the ''Journal of Family Issues'', adherents of [[liberal Christianity]] are more likely to engage in marital infidelity than theologically [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sagepub.com/hillhsstudy/articles/Chapter10_Article%2001.pdf Are There Religious Variations in Marital Infidelity?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted above, liberals are [[Evolution and liberalism|more likely]] to adhere to evolutionary belief than conservatives. A study conducted by the Australian National University, revealed that belief in evolution is associated with moral permissiveness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://creation.com/morals-decline-linked-to-belief-in-evolution Morals decline linked to evolution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== American liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[American liberalism]] and [[Liberal elite|Liberal elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
As noted above, [[American liberalism]] is a political ideology that dominates the [[Democratic Party]]. Its heroes include [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]], [[Eleanor Roosevelt]], and [[Martin Luther King]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Gallup Organization, in the United States,  25% of the population were liberals and 36% were conservatives in 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[US Conservatives Outnumber Liberals by Narrowing Margin], Gallup, January of 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDRoosevelt by Perskie.png|thumbnail|right|200px|[[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 2017, the ''Financial Times'' declared about [[American liberalism]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|...as Democrats struggle to reinvent themselves in the wake of Donald Trump’s victory, their party remains captured by a toxic mix of [[identity politics]] and corporate interests. The establishment wing is still convinced that racism and [[misogyny]], not economic populism, sank Mrs Clinton, and that wooing big corporate donors is still the way to victory in the next election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While money matters, and there may have been some voters who turned away from Mrs Clinton because of gender, the key reason that the Democrats lost in 2016 and are struggling to rebrand themselves is that they have failed to grasp two things.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Firstly, most Americans today care more about jobs than identity, and secondly, the same downward mobility that pushed the white working class towards Mr Trump is moving up the socio-economic food chain, and fast. As research by groups from the International Monetary Fund to the OECD to McKinsey has shown, the technology-related job disruption that resulted in rust belt job losses and wage stagnation since 2000 is beginning to affect white-collar workers across nearly every sector....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But Democrats over-estimated the power and relevance of identity politics (there are still more whites without a college degree than minorities), and underestimated the breadth and depth of labour disruption. In any case, says Robert Johnson, president of the Institute for New Economic Thinking, “it was always a mistake to separate out issues of race and class, because they go hand in hand. In economically insecure times, fear of the ‘other’ increases.” It is a phenomenon exploited by Mr Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.ft.com/content/b34f5536-2c02-11e7-bc4b-5528796fe35c Economics, not identity, is key to reviving American liberalism], Financial Times, 2017&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, American liberals have experienced a number of political losses and many liberals in the United States have become embittered (see: [[American liberalism and 21st century political losses]]),  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Democrats]] and most media outlets in the [[U.S.]] are blatantly liberal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.mrc.org/biasbasics/biasbasics1.asp|title=Media Bias basics|publisher=[[Media Research Center]]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberalism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three liberal tactics can be pronounced using the following [[acronym]]: SIN. Liberals (1) '''s'''hift the subject, they (2) '''i'''gnore the facts, and they (3) '''n'''ame call.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott Baker. [https://www.theblaze.com/stories/did-herman-cain-give-the-dont-miss-speech-at-cpac/ Did Herman Cain Give the ‘Don’t Miss’ Speech at CPAC?], ''[[The Blaze]], February 12, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[YouTube]]. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-N3-j3HM7-A&amp;amp; Herman Cain: &amp;quot;Stupid People Are Ruining America&amp;quot;], February 11, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals typically support a &amp;quot;mixed&amp;quot; economy, a policy similar to that of [[fascism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://fora.tv/2008/01/30/Liberal_Traits_of_Fascism|title=Video discussion about how modern liberalism is actually fascist by author Jonah Goldberg.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Liberals claimed a monopoly on [[compassion]], [[decency]], and [[social justice]] (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of [[civic virtue]] against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. [https://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html]&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://66.218.69.11/search/cache?ei=UTF-8&amp;amp;p=liberal+teachers&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;fp_ip=MX&amp;amp;u=duncankennedy.net/documents/Liberal%2520Values%2520in%2520Legal%2520Education.pdf&amp;amp;w=liberal+liberals+teachers+teacher&amp;amp;d=BNZFhPReRjC1&amp;amp;icp=1&amp;amp;.intl=us Liberal Values in Legal Education] Duncan Kennedy (professor at Harvard Law School)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Liberal Rankings of Congress Members===&lt;br /&gt;
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nationaljournal.com/voteratings/index.htm How the House voted]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of how liberal each member of the United States [[Congress]] is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== American liberalism, demographics and expected tipping point in the decline of American liberalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[American atheism]] and [[Decline of atheism]] and [[Global atheism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Due to the explosive growth of [[global Christianity]] in traditional cultures and their influence on Western [[Christianity]] and the higher birth rate of [[Conservative Christianity|conservative Christians]] and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book ''Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth?'' concerning America:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will to tip the balance in the [[Culture War|culture wars]] towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as abortion. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/05/why-are-years-2012-and-2020-key-years.html Why are 2012 and 2020 key years for Christian creationists and pro-lifers?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberalism in Europe today==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Francois Hollande and Vladimir Putin, Moscow 6 dec 2014 - 05-cropped.jpg|thumb|left|200px|The [[France|French]] liberal politician [[François Hollande]]  was the President of the French Republic from 2012 until 2017. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves ''liberal'' are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alde.eu Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe in the European Parliament]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is a party of the European Parliament that represents most ''liberal'' parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many ''liberal'' parties throughout the world,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal-international.org/ World Federation of Liberalism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; such as the Liberal Party of Australia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.liberal.org.au/ Liberal Party of Australia]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them &amp;quot;liberals&amp;quot; or [[neoliberal]]s. Thus, just as in the US, &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of both European [[socialist]]/[[social democracy|social democratic]] or Social/progressive liberal parties, in contrast to conservative or fiscal liberal parties which again falls into the right-wing part of the political spectrum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pes.org Party of European Socialism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:JohnStuartMill.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px||[[John Stuart Mill]] was a [[classical liberal]]. ]]&lt;br /&gt;
==Historical Liberalism ==&lt;br /&gt;
In history, the word &amp;quot;liberal&amp;quot; has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the &amp;quot;Third Way&amp;quot;. In the area of [[national security]] and foreign policy liberals in the [[U.S.]] failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq.  Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/conway/TS/Bailey/Greenberg-Bailey/Homosexual%20Eugenics.pdf Parental Selection of Children’s Sexual Orientation], '''PDF''', &amp;quot;Political liberals tend, for whatever reason, to be ardent supporters of both gay rights and pro-choice programs.&amp;quot; Greenberg and Bailey&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Original meaning: Classical Liberalism ===&lt;br /&gt;
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with [[conservative]] values such as moral values and traditions derived from Northern European Protestantism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See [[Classical Liberal]]ism. Compare [[Libertarianism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Influential/famous liberals  ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Infamous liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Margaret Sanger]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ocasio Cortez.jpeg|thumb|250px|[[AOC]] ]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Hussein Obama]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.businessinsider.com/cheney-obama-is-the-worst-president-of-my-lifetime-2014-7 CHENEY: Obama Is 'The Worst President Of My Lifetime']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Elizabeth Warren]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[George Soros]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Emmanuel Macron]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Saul Alinsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Noam Chomsky]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Maynard Keynes]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[David Thorstad]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hunterbear.org/shooting_lupus.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a founding member of NAMBLA.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pope Francis]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lee Harvey Oswald]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Howard Zinn]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Albert Einstein]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Nye]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John Wayne Gacy]] - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, [[serial killer]] John Wayne Gacy said he was [[bisexuality|bisexual]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=YDyGCgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT129 John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster], Transcript&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;very liberal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=YDyGCgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT20 John Wayne Gacy: Defending a Monster], Transcript&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gacy was also a [[Democrat Party]] activist who had his picture taken with [[Rosalynn Carter]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.digitaljournal.com/image/45527 Johnwaynegacyrosalynncarter.jpg]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Gene Roddenberry]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Liberal Organizations of thought==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Margaret Sanger and Charles V. Drysdale cph.3b18067.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|[[Margaret Sanger]] was the founder of [[Planned Parenthood]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AARP|AARP - American Association of Retired People]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACLU|ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ACORN|ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[AFL-CIO|AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Amnesty International|AI - Amnesty International]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[A.N.S.W.E.R.|ANSWER - Act Now to Stop War and End Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[CAIR|CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic National Committee]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Greenpeace]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[MoveOn.org]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NARAL|NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[NAACP|NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Committee for an Effective Congress]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Education Association]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[National Organization of Women|NOW - National Organization of Women]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[PETA|PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Planned Parenthood|Planned Parenthood Federation of America]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Progressives for Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rainbow/PUSH Coalition]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[SEIU|SEIU - Service Employees International Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[U.S. Peace Council]]&lt;br /&gt;
Source: [https://web.archive.org/web/20060509044946/http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm The Politix Group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes on Liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I never use the words [[Democrats]] and [[Republicans]]. It's [[liberals]] and [[Americans]].&amp;quot; -James Watt, Secretary of the Interior under [[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.&amp;quot; -[[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Liberals see racism where it doesn't exist, fabricate it when they can't find it and ignore it within their own ranks.” ―[[Michelle Malkin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Words mean nothing to liberals. They say whatever will help advance their cause at the moment, switch talking points in a heartbeat, and then act indignant if anyone uses the exact same argument they were using five minutes ago.&amp;quot; -[[Ann Coulter]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2010/11/23/the_25_best_quotes_about_liberals The 25 Best Quotes About Liberals]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The reason any conservative's failing is always major news is that it allows liberals to engage in their very favorite taunt: Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy is the only sin that really inflames them. Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce. It's an intriguing strategy. By openly admitting to being philanderers, draft dodgers, liars, weasels and cowards, liberals avoid ever being hypocrites.&amp;quot; -Ann Coulter&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you can somehow force a liberal into a point-counterpoint argument, his retorts will bear no relation to what you've said -- unless you were in fact talking about your looks, your age, your weight, your personal obsessions, or whether you are a fascist. In the famous liberal two-step, they leap from one idiotic point to the next, so you can never nail them. It's like arguing with someone with Attention Deficit Disorder.&amp;quot; -[[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Inside many liberals is a totalitarian screaming to get out. They don't like to have another point of view in the room that they don't squash and the way they try to squash it is by character assassination and name calling.&amp;quot; -David Horowitz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;End results that work that don't involve government threaten liberals.&amp;quot; -[[Rush Limbaugh]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I'd like to know why well-educated idiots keep apologizing for lazy and complaining people who think the world owes them a living. I'd like to know why they make excuses for cowards who spit in the faces of the police and then run behind the judicial sob sisters. I can't understand these people who carry placards to save the life of some criminal, yet have no thought for the innocent victim.&amp;quot; -John Wayne&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes by Liberals==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The number one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S.&amp;quot; -[[Joe Biden]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There is no reason the nation of Africa cannot, and should not, join the ranks of the worlds most prosperous nations.&amp;quot; -Joe Biden&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.facebook.com/StupidStuffDemocratsSay Stupid Stuff Democrats Say]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Romney wants to give EIGHT HUNDRED MILLION BILLION in tax breaks to the rich.&amp;quot; -Joe Biden&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Will the Mars Rover be able to show the flag the astronauts planted there before?&amp;quot; -Sheila Jackson Lee &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ytr7576.jpg|thumbnail|200px|right|[[Nancy Pelosi]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Isn't it a little racist to call it Black Friday?&amp;quot; -Joy Behar &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Is there such a thing as a man-made stroke? …I know what this [Republican] party is capable of.&amp;quot; -Joy Behar&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet.&amp;quot; -[[Al Gore]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The center of the earth is about a million degrees.&amp;quot; -Al Gore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A zebra does not change its spots.&amp;quot; -Al Gore&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied.&amp;quot; -[[Jeremiah Wright]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Every month that we do not have an economic recovery package 500 million Americans lose their jobs.&amp;quot; -[[Nancy Pelosi]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My favorite word, that is really easy, my favorite word is 'the word'.&amp;quot; -Nancy Pelosi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it” - Nancy Pelosi&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Why can't I just eat my waffle?&amp;quot; -[[Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go.&amp;quot; -[[Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Welcome to Cinco de Quattro!&amp;quot; -Barack Obama&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The time has changed for come.&amp;quot; -Barack Obama&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;They support democratic institutions in Kyrzakhstan&amp;quot; -John Kerry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My fear is that the whole island (of Guam) will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize.&amp;quot; -Democrat Congressman Hank Johnson&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2013/08/17/the-25-stupidest-liberal-quotes-of-the-last-decade-n1666619 The 25 Stupidest Liberal Quotes Of The Last Decade]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security.&amp;quot; -Obama foreign policy adviser Richard Danzig&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;If you take out the killings, Washington actually has a very very low crime rate.&amp;quot; -Former D.C. Mayor Marion Barry&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://conservative.wikia.com/wiki/Hilarious_Liberal_Quotes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What right does Congress have to go around making laws just because they deem it necessary?&amp;quot; -Marion Barry&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;My appetite is so good that I can eat the table cloth right off the chair.&amp;quot; -Democrat Congressman Joe Moakley &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Those who died in the earthquake, their lives will never be the same again.&amp;quot; -Barbara Boxer&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I have to march because my mother couldn't have an abortion.&amp;quot; -Maxine Water&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.azquotes.com/quote/687234&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I dare you, you little fruitcake!&amp;quot; -Democrat Congressman Pete Stark&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I root for hurricanes&amp;quot; -James Wolcott&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I've got a secret for you: Kiss my a**.&amp;quot; -George McGovern&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.&amp;quot; -[[Norman Thomas]], six-time U.S. Presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Norman.Thomas.Quote.FFB1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.&amp;quot; -Hillary Rodham Clinton&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hawkins, John (June 16, 2015). [https://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2015/06/16/draft-n2012995 20 Hillary Clinton Quotes You Should Read Before Voting For Her]. ''Townhall''. Retrieved May 16, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Reagan will raise taxes, and so will I. He won't tell you. I just did.&amp;quot; -Walter Mondale&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Modern liberalism and the use of mockery rather than reasonable argumentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and mockery]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a ''BloombergView'' article, Stephen L. Carter wrote about modern liberalism:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But the left has work to do, not only on policy and organization but also on attitude. Too many of my [[progressivism|progressive]] friends seem to have forgotten how to make actual arguments, and have become expert instead at condemnation, derision and mockery. On issue after issue, they’re very good at explaining why no one could oppose their policy positions except for the basest of motives. As to those positions themselves, they are too often announced with a zealous solemnity suggesting that their views are Holy Writ -- and those who disagree are cast into the outer political darkness. In short, the left has lately been dripping with hubris, which in classic literature always portends a fall.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-11-11/trump-and-the-fall-of-liberalism Trump and the Fall of Liberalism] by Stephen L. Carter, BloombergView&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal influence in extreme ideologies (and vice-versa) ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Similarities between Communism, Nazism and liberalism|Communism and Nazism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the following individuals were not liberals, they shared several left-wing/liberal views in their ideologies, which overlapped with American/European liberalism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Marxist/communist figures ===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Karl Marx]]—opposed religion and supported taking it completely out of public life; supported the disestablishment of the family; strong support for labor, socialism, and an expansive government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Communist Manifesto''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Admired by many liberals,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Dedaj, Paulina (May 5, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2018/05/05/moviemaker-michael-moore-wishes-karl-marx-happy-200th-birthday.html Moviemaker Michael Moore wishes Karl Marx a happy 200th birthday]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Duke, Selwyn (May 2, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/reviews/opinion/item/28951-ny-times-hails-marx-on-his-birthday-you-were-right New York Times Hails Marx on His Birthday: “You Were Right!”] ''The New American''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Sunkara, Bhaskar (January 25, 2013). [https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jan/25/karl-marx-relevant-21st-century Why the ideas of Karl Marx are more relevant than ever in the 21st century]. ''The Guardian''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Cooper, Ryan (May 4, 2018). [http://theweek.com/articles/770718/time-normalize-karl-marx It's time to normalize Karl Marx]. ''The Week''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including [[European Commission]] president [[Jean-Claude Juncker]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Hale, Virginia (May 5, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/05/05/eu-president-heartfelt-defence-karl-marx/ EU Chief Jean-Claude Juncker Defies Protests to Deliver Heartfelt Defence of Karl Marx]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (May 5, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/28979-european-commission-president-praises-karl-marx-s-contributions-to-european-union European Commission President Praises Karl Marx’s Contributions to European Union]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (April 29, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/28934-eu-commission-president-juncker-set-to-honor-karl-marx European Commission President Juncker Set to Honor Karl Marx]. ''The New American''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Vladimir Lenin]]—socialist, supported an expansive government, supported [[one-world government]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mao Zedong]]—socialist. Introduced [[Maoism]], some American liberals admire him&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shapiro, Ben (October 17, 2012). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/10/17/obama-debate-advisor-anita-dunn-mao/ Obama Debate Coach Named Mao as Favorite Political Philosopher]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Stalin]]—socialist. Introduced [[Stalinism]], admired by many (European-) socialists/liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.tni.org/es/node/7617&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fidel Castro]]—socialist, opposition to religion, government-run healthcare. In addition, Castro is admired by numerous American/European liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wootson, Cleve R., Jr. (November 26, 2016). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/11/26/trudeau-called-castro-a-remarkable-leader-twitter-imagined-what-he-would-say-about-stalin/?tid=pm_world_pop Trudeau called Castro a ‘remarkable leader.’ Twitter imagined what he would say about Stalin.] ''The Washington Post''. Retrieved November 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lott, Jeremy (November 26, 2016). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/jill-stein-praises-fidel-castro-a-symbol-of-the-struggle-for-justice/article/2608223 Jill Stein praises Fidel Castro: 'A symbol of the struggle for justice']. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved November 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richardson, Valerie (November 28, 2016). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/28/aaron-mair-sierra-club-president-fidel-castro-had-/ Sierra Club president: Fidel Castro had ‘more honor’ than Donald Trump]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;O'ReillyNov.29.2016&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.billoreilly.com/show?action=viewTVShow&amp;amp;showID=4323#3 The O'Reilly Factor - Monday, November 28, 2016]. ''billoreilly.com''. Retrieved November 29, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hugo Chavez]]—socialist. Admired by many American/European liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kew, Ben (May 4, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/05/04/ten-influential-public-figures-praised-venezuelas-descent-socialist-hell/ 10 Famous People Who Praised Venezuela’s Descent Into Socialist Hell]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 5, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Che Guevara]]—socialist, admired by many liberals&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2007/05/illegal-immigrants-rally-in-support-of.html Illegal Immigrants Rally For Dead Marxist Che Guevara]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.che-mart.com/WhoisChe.php Che-Mart]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones, Nigel (January 2, 2009). [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/4077397/It-is-a-sad-reflection-of-our-time-that-Che-Guevara-is-seen-as-a-hero.html It is a sad reflection of our time that Che Guevara is seen as a hero] ''The Telegraph''. Retrieved April 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Che_Guevara_in_popular_culture&amp;amp;oldid=833775290&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reiland, Ralph R. (August 12, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/29769-che-guevara-romanticizing-tyranny Che Guevara: Romanticizing Tyranny]. ''The New American''. Retrieved August 12, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Bernie Sanders]]-socialist.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]]-socialist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2019, several members of the [[European Commission]] sang the far-left Marxist song &amp;quot;Bella Ciao.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tomlinson, Chris (December 5, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/12/05/leftist-european-commissioners-slammed-singing-far-left-bella-ciao/ EU Commissioners Slammed for Singing Marxist Anthem ‘Bella Ciao’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Fascists ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also:'' [[Liberalism#Nazism and socialism|Nazism and socialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Adolf Hitler]]—supported animal &amp;quot;rights,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[ https://books.google.com/books?id=e7FME0btkH0C&amp;amp;pg=PA62&amp;amp;lpg=PA62&amp;amp;dq=hitler+animal+rights&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=PIxjDRDBj1&amp;amp;sig=tbJisPm39hMcxj1g6xL0Kh0sn7g&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwi3qZP7xOPTAhVr4oMKHeTMA_c4FBDoAQhKMAc#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=hitler%20animal%20rights&amp;amp;f=false Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions], pg. 62.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harrison, David; Paterson, Tony (September 22, 2002). [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1407954/Thanks-to-Hitler-hunting-with-hounds-is-still-verboten.html Thanks to Hitler, hunting with hounds is still verboten]. ''The Telegraph''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EllisWash.&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; environmentalism,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;EllisWash.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Washington, Ellis (March 26, 2011). [https://www.wnd.com/2011/03/279449/ The Nazi Cult of the Organic']. ''WND''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.columbia.edu/~lnp3/mydocs/ecology/nazi_ecology.htm Nazi &amp;quot;Ecology&amp;quot;], Frank Furedi, ''columbia.edu''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Musser, Mark (February 6, 2016). [https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/yale_professor_on_nazi_environmentalism_so_close_yet_so_far.html Yale Professor on Nazi Environmentalism: So Close, yet So Far]. ''American Thinker''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; gun control (see [[Gun Control in Nazi Germany]]),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Halbrook, Stephen (December 2, 2013). [https://www.nationalreview.com/2013/12/how-nazis-used-gun-control-stephen-p-halbrook/ How the Nazis Used Gun Control]. ''National Review''. Retrieved March 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kline, Audrey D. (May 9, 2014). [https://mises.org/library/gun-control-nazi-germany Gun Control in Nazi Germany]. ''Mises Institute''. Retrieved March 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wolverton, II, J.D., Joe (January 30, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/14367-nazi-gun-control-laws-a-familiar-road-to-citizen-disarmament Nazi Gun Control Laws: a Familiar Road to Citizen Disarmament?] ''The New American''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stupp, Herbert W. (July 13, 2015). [https://spectator.org/63424_hitler-and-gun-control/ Hitler and Gun Control]. ''The American Spectator''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hoft, Joe (March 24, 2018). [https://thegatewaypundit.com/2018/03/reminder-hitler-also-used-children-to-promote-gun-control/ FLASHBACK: Hitler Also Used Children to Promote Gun Control]. ''The Gateway Pundit''. Retrieved March 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; socialism,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://louderwithcrowder.com/myth-busted-actually-yes-hitler-was-a-socialist-liberal/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; single-payer healthcare (see [[Health care in Nazi Germany]]), and a large expansionist government, and had an intolerance for opposing views.&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benito Mussolini]]—a socialist from a socialist family who only split from mainstream socialism due to his support for Italy during [[World War I]] rather than supporting a [[one-world government|globalist workers' revolution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.biography.com/people/benito-mussolini-9419443 Benito Mussolini]. ''Biography.com''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.encyclopedia.com/people/history/italian-history-biographies/benito-mussolini Benito Mussolini]. ''Encyclopedia.com'' (from the Encyclopedia of World Biography''). 2004. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Prior to [[World War I]], Mussolini wrote for socialist publications and spoke highly of Marx.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greenspan, Jesse (October 25, 2012). [http://www.history.com/news/9-things-you-may-not-know-about-mussolini 9 Things You May Not Know About Mussolini]. ''History.com''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He used gun control to help gain power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Quammen, E. David (August 12, 2013). [http://www.teapartytribune.com/2013/08/12/italian-gun-control-right-before-mussolini-seized-total-control/ Italian ‘gun control’ right before Mussolini seized total control….]. ''Tea Party Tribune''. Retrieved May 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative vs. liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Liberal corporate tyranny]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Left-wing war on women]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
{|background=&amp;quot;none&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative resources]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservapedia:Articles about liberals|Articles about liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Classical liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Drinking Liberally]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Godless liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Last wordism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal celebrity obsession|Liberal celebrity obsession]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia|Liberal Behavior on Conservapedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Elite]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay: Liberal Falsehoods|Liberal Falsehoods]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Fascism]] tendencies. &lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal friendship]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Gloss]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal grading]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal hysteria|Liberal hysteria]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intellectualism|Liberal Intellectualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal labels]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right|Liberal Lies About the American Right]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal logic]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness|Liberal Mind]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Massachusetts liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Progressives]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Scientific Illiteracy and Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[European Liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal and conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal anger]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal competitiveness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal concealment]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal conscience]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal dislikes]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal excuses]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal fear]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal gossip]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal guilt]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal confusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hedonism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal hyperbole]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal infiltration]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal media hype]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal opinion]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal revisionists]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberal self-righteousness]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberalism-ism]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Liberals and conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Intelligence]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Incoherence of liberal thought]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Liberal Predictions of the Decade]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further Information==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Best New Conservative Words#New Liberal Terms|New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Links]]&lt;br /&gt;
* http://www.studentnewsdaily.com/conservative-vs-liberal-beliefs/&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/c-how-the-specter-of-communism-is-ruling-our-world How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World]. ''The Epoch Times''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Ideologies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Darth Umbris</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=U.S._%22Party-switch%22_myth&amp;diff=1718227</id>
		<title>U.S. &quot;Party-switch&quot; myth</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=U.S._%22Party-switch%22_myth&amp;diff=1718227"/>
		<updated>2021-01-03T18:46:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Darth Umbris: Crucial correction. Rep. Albert Watson did in fact change parties in 1965, leaving the Democratic Party to become a Republican.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The alleged U.S. &amp;quot;party switch&amp;quot; claim made by liberals&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.livescience.com/34241-democratic-republican-parties-switch-platforms.html Why Did the Democratic and Republican Parties Switch Platforms?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and progressives&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F736x%2F8b%2Fe9%2Ffa%2F8be9fa9180123452b30a3df415de9568--us-election--current-events.jpg&amp;amp;f=1&amp;amp;nofb=1 JPEG Image]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; over decades is a political [[hoax]] and [[conspiracy theory]] that attempts to smear the [[Republican Party]].  The narrative, which has been crafted with the help of [[Communists]] (who infiltrated the [[Democrat Party]] over the decades&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/democrats-allow-communists-to-infiltrate-their-party-across-the-nation_2777771.html Democrats Allow Communists to Infiltrate Their Party Across the Nation] at the Epoch Times&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.theepochtimes.com/houston-communists-break-the-law-by-running-as-democrats_2629206.html Houston Communists Break the Law by Running as Democrats] at the Epoch Times&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://aun-tv.com/2015/08/did-the-communist-party-usa-take-over-democratic-party-in-1988/ Did The Communist Party USA Take Over Democratic Party in 1988?]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2012/09/frank_marshall_davis_and_the_subversion_of_the_democratic_party.html Frank Marshall Davis and the Subversion of the Democratic Party] at American Thinker&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and who are known to lie, deceive and engage in historical revisionism for the sake of being contrarian&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2011/10/lying-essence-of-communism.html Lying, the Essence of Communism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), typically assumes that the Democrat and Republican parties &amp;quot;switched sides&amp;quot; during the 1960s, where the Republican Party somehow became the party of &amp;quot;racists&amp;quot; and the Democrats suddenly becoming the &amp;quot;champions of civil rights.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Party switch myth&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://soapboxie.com/us-politics/Debunking-the-Persistent-Lie-that-Republicans-and-Democrats-Switched-Sides-on-Race Republicans and Democrats Did Not Switch Sides on Race]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many reputable historians and political scientists such as [[Carol Swain]] ([https://www.prageru.com/video/why-did-the-democratic-south-become-republican/ see this video]) and political commentators such as Bob Parks&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.blackandblondemedia.com/2009/01/14/democrat-race-lie/ The Democrat Race Lie] at Black &amp;amp; Blonde Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dixiecrat Myth&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.blackandblondemedia.com/2010/03/19/the-dixiecrat-myth/ The Dixiecrat Myth] at Black &amp;amp; Blonde Media&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; strongly agree that the parties did not switch sides,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Party switch myth&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; as the Democrats only switched strategies with Communist help.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While many modern [[leftists]] will note the [[liberal]] policies promoted by the Republican establishment for a while during the 1900s that dissipated in the 1960s to promote their myth, it's important to note the conservative roots of the early foundations of the Republican Party, as mentioned below. [[Leftists]] also falsely&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidmarotta/2013/02/28/dwight-d-eisenhower-on-tax-cuts-and-a-balanced-budget/#b573e515047d Dwight D. Eisenhower on tax cuts and a balanced budget]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; characterize President [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] as a [[liberal Republican]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://alittlebitleft.wordpress.com/2016/03/31/eisenhower-the-last-true-republican/ Eisenhower: The Last True Republican]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fengineerofknowledge.files.wordpress.com%2F2012%2F01%2Fikes-warning.jpg&amp;amp;f=1&amp;amp;nofb=1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when he tended to favor [[conservative]] policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://ontheissues.org/Dwight_Eisenhower.htm Dwight Eisenhower on the Issues]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Civil Rights Act==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See: [[Civil Rights Act of 1957]] and [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1968 PresidentialElection.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Map of electoral votes]]&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals often point to [[Lyndon B. Johnson]]'s so-called advocacy for civil rights to push the myth. This was despite the fact that Johnson worked to water down the [[1957 Civil Rights Act]], weakening it down by removing the stringent voting protection clauses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1951-2000/The-Civil-Rights-Act-of-1957/ The Civil Rights Act of 1957]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was afterwards that the legislation was passed, which Johnson voted for.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HR. 6127. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1957.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/85-1957/s75 HR. 6127. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1957.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the most important aspects of perpetuating this myth is the faux talking point surrounding the response by Southern Dixiecrats to the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights act.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://prospect.org/culture/books/great-party-switch/ The Great Party Switch], &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The myth involves looking at a map of the 1960 Electoral map and comparing it to the 1964 Electoral map, all while ignoring the results of the 1968 Presidential Electoral map.  Aided by leftist historians,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.history.com/news/how-the-party-of-lincoln-won-over-the-once-democratic-south How the ‘Party of Lincoln’ Won Over the Once Democratic South]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; one is supposed to see the Democrats winning the South in 1960, losing it in 1964, and concluding that this must be where the &amp;quot;party switch&amp;quot; took place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For this myth to hold, Republicans should have won the south in as large of numbers in 1968 as in 1964.  But they didn't. In the [[United States presidential election of 1968]], Republicans lost almost the entirety of the South.  Democrat [[George Wallace]], running on a third party ticket,  took a bulk of the [[Deep South]] and Republicans even lost Texas to Humphrey.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, as correctly noted by [[Dinesh D'Souza]], the passage of the Civil Rights Act had greater Republican support than it did Democrat support.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/dinesh-dsouza-the-secret-history-of-the-democratic-party Dinesh D'Souza: The secret history of the Democratic Party]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So if there may have been some Southerners upset that the Civil Rights Act passed while blaming Democrats along the way, they would not have chosen as their home the Republican Party, who were the Act's greatest supporters.  Of the 171 Republicans in the House in 1964, 136 of them voted for it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION (H. RES. 789) PROVIDING FOR HOUSE APPROVAL OF THE BILL AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/88-1964/h182 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION (H. RES. 789) PROVIDING FOR HOUSE APPROVAL OF THE BILL AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of the 33 Republicans in the Senate, 27 of them voted for it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HR. 7152. PASSAGE.&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/88-1964/s409 HR. 7152. PASSAGE.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is 79% of House Republicans, and 82% of Senate Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the Democrat side, 153 of 244 House and 46 of 67 Senate members voted yes.  That is 63% of Democrat house members and 69% of Democrat Senate members.  These numbers become even more bleak for the &amp;quot;party myth&amp;quot; idea when you compare the yes and no votes from Northern and Southern democrats.  Virtually every Southern Democrat voted against the Civil Rights Act, meaning that Southern voters had no reason to punish them.  Additionally, while the bill was on the Senate floor it was the subject of filibustering from Southern Democrats for 57 days,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.aei.org/articles/how-the-south-came-to-rise-again-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964/ How the South Came to Rise Again: The Civil Rights Act of 1964]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the longest filibuster in U.S. history.  It was a Northern Republican, [[Everett Dirksen]] of [[Illinois]], who broke the filibuster. Dirksen was a noted [[conservative]], along with then-House Minority Leader [[Charles A. Halleck]], a prominent member of the [[Conservative Coalition]] who was also an advocate for the legislation. The two became famous during the time, with the Congressional Leadership Statement then being known as &amp;quot;[[The Ev and Charlie Show]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cop.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/The_Ev_and_Charlie_Show.htm &amp;quot;The Ev and Charlie Show&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Albert Gore Sr..jpg|thumb|right|175px|Democrat Sen. [[Albert Gore, Sr.]] fervently opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act and unsuccessfully sought to weaken the bill.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barry Goldwater]], known for having been a staunch leader of the conservative wing of the [[Republican Party]] during the 60s, is often falsely smeared by [[liberals]] as a &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; for having voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Among such, [[NPR]] has propagated mischaracterizations of the [[Arizona]] senator that have been refuted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.newsmax.com/John-Gizzi/Barry-Goldwater-Reagan-Civil-Rights-Act-San-Francisco/2014/07/18/id/583541/ NPR Wrong on Goldwater '64, Civil Rights, Say 4 Who Were There]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In contrast to whitewashing attempts by [[liberal deceit|deceitful leftists]], Goldwater was a strong proponent of civil rights, having voted in favor of the 1957 Civil Rights Act.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HR. 6127. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1957.&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; He had also been a member of the [[NAACP]] at the time, and his only opposition to the 1964 bill came from his objections to Titles II and VII on a constitutional basis in opposing excessive federal government powers,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.heritage.org/node/11300/print-display Barry M. Goldwater: The Most Consequential Loser in American Politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stating:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Barry Goldwater on the Civil Rights Act: The Antecedent to Rand Paul&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/126630 Barry Goldwater on the Civil Rights Act: The Antecedent to Rand Paul]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;''It so happens that I am in agreement with the [anti-racial segregation] objectives of the Supreme Court as stated in the Brown decision.'' I am not prepared, however, to impose that judgment of mine on the people of Mississippi or South Carolina. . . . That is their business, not mine.  I believe that the problem of race relations, like all social and cultural problems, is best handled by the people directly concerned . . . [and] should not be effected by engines of national power.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this represents Goldwater's firm view that federal and state powers as directed by the [[Constitution]] and [[Bill of Rights]] should be firmly upheld; while liberals claim he was supposedly a &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot;, he merely differed from others such as [[Everett Dirksen]] in his preferred approach to enacting civil rights.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Barry Goldwater on the Civil Rights Act: The Antecedent to Rand Paul&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Goldwater furthermore opposed and voted against an amendment introduced by [[Al Gore, Sr.]] to weaken the bill,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://nationalcenter.org/project21/1999/05/01/blacks-gored-by-a-lie-al-gore-sr-the-gop-and-the-civil-rights-act-of-1964-by-r-d-davis/ Blacks “Gored” By a Lie: Al Gore Sr., the GOP and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, by R.D. Davis]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet liberals attack the Arizona senator rather than Gore despite the latter's record in opposing civil rights.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2000/apr/5/20000405-011050-4004r/ The Gore civil rights record]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Southern strategy==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|Southern strategy}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several myths surrounding the so called Southern strategy, most notably, out-of-context quotes taken from a taped interview with [[Lee Atwater]]. The full context of the interview thoroughly refutes [[liberal deceit]] that has been perpetuated by [[leftists]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bradford-delong.com/2017/03/lee-atwater-interview-with-alexander-p-lamis-rough-transcript-weekend-reading.html Lee Atwater (1981): Interview with Alexander P. Lamis: Rough Transcript: Weekend Reading] ('''Warning:''' Quotes in article contain foul, inappropriate language)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Inconsistencies==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Liberal logic]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bilbo.png|thumb|left|190px|Democrat [[Theodore G. Bilbo]] was an extremely racist Democrat from Mississippi who blocked anti-lynching legislation and an apologist for racial violence. He was noted as &amp;quot;a real friend of liberal government.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williamson, Kevin D. (June 23, 2019). [https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/new-deal-democrats-republican-party/ New Deal . . . Conservatives?]. ''National Review''. Retrieved January 2, 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The myth of the parties &amp;quot;switching&amp;quot; is very inconsistent with actual U.S. history.  The Republican Party only became much more right-wing during the 1910s, after [[Theodore Roosevelt]] and his Republican progressives at the time split with the Taft-supporting [[conservatives]].  The Democrat Party arguably (according to some) became much more left-wing during the 1930s during the [[New Deal coalition]] era. [[Progressives]] who brainwash youth in the modern-day education system erase in history textbooks examples of certain racist liberals such as [[Hugo Black]]. They furthermore ignore the fact that many racist Democrats in the 30s were [[leftists]] who fervently supported the [[New Deal]],&amp;lt;ref group=note&amp;gt;While several Southern Democrats broke from [[FDR]] and joined the [[Conservative Coalition]], it was a relatively small number.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including [[Theodore Bilbo]]. It should also be noted [[liberal]] Democrat [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]'s support came strongest from the [[Deep South]] in his election/re-election victories.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With respect to the 1960s and the era when the parties are rumored to have &amp;quot;switched sides&amp;quot; ''en masse'', a review of the senators and governors at the time tells a completely different story.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nationalreview.com/2014/08/myth-republican-racism-mona-charen/ The Myth of Republican Racism]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Since the end of [[Reconstruction]] in 1874 and 1967, Arkansas had no Republican governors; in the 53 years after 1967, Republicans have only occupied the governorship for 17 years. In fact, since the founding of the GOP until 2020, Republicans have only occupied the governors office in Arkansas for 21 out of 152 years.  During the 93 years of an unbroken string of Democrat governors from 1874 until 1967, Democrat terrorists committed at least 237 known [[lynching]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5467/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In certain districts it should be noted that the mountainous areas of eastern Tennessee and the Ozark Mountain region of Arkansas, during the Democrat &amp;quot;Solid South&amp;quot; days, have voted reliably Republican since before the Civil War (as an example, the 2nd Congressional District of Tennessee has voted Republican in every Congressional election since before the Civil War; the neighboring 1st District has only voted Democrat twice in this same period, both times in the 1870s).  This is because both areas were not suited to plantation farming and the accompanying Democrat [[slave power]].  Even with the shift in party support in the South, these areas remain solid Republican.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Dixiecrat Myth&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Fulbright.jpg|thumb|right|200px|Former Sen. [[James William Fulbright]] of [[Arkansas]], a noted segregationist, represents many aspects of the modern-day [[Democratic Party]] beyond racism; favoring globalist policies, promoting [[anti-Zionism]], and especially becoming increasingly liberal over time. His legacy received the praise of [[Bill Clinton]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
Additionally, below is are tables showing the votes of Southern Democrat senators and congressmen on the Civil Rights Act.  Many of those served for years both before and after the Act.  Looking at the senators table, only one switched parties, and did so due to disenchantment toward the Democrats over racially-motivated [[Great Society]] programs and preference toward [[big government]].  Moreover, where Democrats did have their terms in office come to an end, for any number of reasons, their successors were also largely Democrats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was not until the [[Republican Revolution of 1994]] that for the first time in modern American History the Republicans held a majority of Southern congressional seats, a full three decades after the passage of the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2018-05-01-the-myth-of-the-republican-democrat-switch/ The Myth of the Republican-Democrat 'Switch'], Dan O'Donnell&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As the South became less racist, it became more Republican.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/06/democratic-party-racist-history-mona-charen/ Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;font-size:95%&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;|'''Southern Democrat senators'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!State&lt;br /&gt;
!Name&lt;br /&gt;
!Vote&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HR. 7152. PASSAGE.&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
!First took office&lt;br /&gt;
!Left office&lt;br /&gt;
!Joined Republicans?&lt;br /&gt;
!Successor's party affiliation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Alabama || J. Lister Hill || Nay || April 26, 1938 || January 3, 1969 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[John Sparkman]] || Nay || November 6, 1946 || January 3, 1979 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Arkansas || [[J. William Fulbright]] || Nay || January 3, 1945 || December 31, 1974 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[John McClellan]] || Nay || January 3, 1943 || November 28, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Florida || Spessard Holland || Nay || September 25, 1946 || January 3, 1971 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|George Smathers || Nay || January 3, 1967 || January 3, 1969 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Georgia || [[Richard Russell]] || Nay || January 12, 1933 || January 21, 1971 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Herman Talmadge || Nay || January 3, 1957 || January 3, 1981 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Louisiana || [[Allen J. Ellender]] || Nay || January 3, 1937 || July 27, 1972 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Russell Long]] || Nay || December 31, 1948 || January 3, 1981 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Mississippi || [[James Eastland]] || Nay || January 3, 1943 || December 27, 1978 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[John Stennis]] || Nay || November 5, 1947 || January 3, 1989 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|North Carolina || Samuel Ervin || Nay || June 5, 1954 || December 31, 1974 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Benjamin Jordan || Nay || April 19, 1958 || January 3, 1973 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|South Carolina || Olin Johnston || Nay || January 3, 1945 || April 18, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Strom Thurmond]] || Nay || November 7, 1956 || January 3, 2003 || September 16, 1964 || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Tennessee || [[Albert Gore, Sr.]] || Nay || January 3, 1953 || January 3, 1971 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Herbert Walters || Nay || August 20, 1963 || November 3, 1964 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Texas&amp;lt;ref group=note&amp;gt;Note: Texas only had one Democrat senator in 1964.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; || Ralph Yarborough || Yea || April 29, 1957 || January 3, 1971 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|Virginia || [[Harry F. Byrd]] || Nay || March 4, 1933 || November 10, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Absalom Robertson || Nay || November 6, 1946 || December 30, 1966 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot;|West Virginia || [[Robert Byrd]] || Nay || January 3, 1959 || June 28, 2010 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jennings Randolph || Nay || November 5, 1958 || January 3, 1985 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;font-size:95%&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;|'''Southern Democrat congressmen'''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!State&lt;br /&gt;
!Name&lt;br /&gt;
!Vote&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION (H. RES. 789) PROVIDING FOR HOUSE APPROVAL OF THE BILL AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE.&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
!First took office&lt;br /&gt;
!Left office&lt;br /&gt;
!Joined Republicans?&lt;br /&gt;
!Successor's party affiliation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;8&amp;quot;|Alabama || George Andrews || Nay || March 14, 1944 || December 25, 1971 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Carl Elliott || Nay || January 3, 1949 || January 3, 1965  || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|George Grant || Nay || June 14, 1938 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|George Huddleston, Jr. || Nay || 1954 || 1965 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert E. Jones, Jr. || Nay || January 28, 1947 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Albert Rains || Nay || January 3, 1945 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kenneth Roberts || Nay || January 3, 1951 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Armistead Selden || Nay || January 3, 1953 || January 3, 1969 || 1979 || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;|Arkansas || Ezekiel Gathings || Nay || January 3, 1939 || January 3, 1969 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Wilbur Mills || Nay || January 3, 1939 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|James Trimble || Nay || January 3, 1945 || January 3, 1967 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Oren Harris || Nay || January 3, 1941 || February 3, 1966 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;|Florida || Robert Sikes || Nay || January 3, 1941 || January 3, 1979 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Charles E. Bennett || Nay || January 3, 1949 || January 3, 1993 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Claude Pepper || Yea || January 3, 1963 || May 30, 1989 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Dante Fascell || Nay || January 3, 1955 || January 3, 1993 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Albert Herlong || Nay || January 3, 1949 || January 3, 1969 || 1985 || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Paul Rogers || Nay || January 3, 1955 || January 3, 1979 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|James A. Haley || Nay || January 3, 1953 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat (switched to Republican in 1984)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Billy Matthews || Nay || January 3, 1953 || January 3, 1967 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Don Fuqua || Nay || January 3, 1963 || January 3, 1987 || Never || Democrat (switched to Republican in 1989)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Sam Gibbons || Nay || January 3, 1963 || January 3, 1997 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;10&amp;quot;|Georgia || George E. Hagan || Nay || January 3, 1961 || January 3, 1973 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John L. Pilcher || No vote || February 4, 1953 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Elijah Forrester || Nay || January 3, 1951 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Republican (since 1964)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Flynt || Nay || November 2, 1954 || January 3, 1979 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Charles Weltner || Yes || January 3, 1963 || January 3, 1967 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Carl Vinson]] || Nay || November 3, 1914 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Davis || Nay || January 3, 1961 || January 3, 1975 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|James Russell Tuten || Nay || January 3, 1963 || January 3, 1967 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philip Landrum || Nay || January 3, 1953 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert Stephens || Nay || January 3, 1961 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;8&amp;quot;|Louisiana || Felix Edward Hébert || No vote || January 3, 1941 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Hale Boggs]] || Nay || January 3, 1947 || January 3, 1973 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Edwin Willis || Nay || January 3, 1949 || January 3, 1969 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joseph D. Waggonner || Nay || December 19, 1961 || January 3, 1979 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Otto Passman || Nay || January 3, 1947 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|James Hobson Morrison || Nay || January 3, 1943 || January 3, 1967 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Theo A. Thompson || Nay || January 3, 1953 || July 1, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Gillis W. Long || Nay || January 3, 1963 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot;|Mississippi || Thomas Abernethy || Nay || January 3, 1943 || January 3, 1973 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jamie Whitten || Nay || November 4, 1941 || January 3, 1995 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Bell Williams || Nay || January 3, 1947 || January 16, 1968 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|William Arthur Winstead || Nay || January 3, 1943 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|William Colmer || Nay || March 4, 1933 || January 3, 1973 || Never || Republican (since 1972)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;9&amp;quot;|North Carolina || Herbert C. Bonner || Nay || November 5, 1940 || November 7, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lawrence Fountain || Nay || January 3, 1953 || January 3, 1983 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|David Henderson || Nay || January 3, 1961 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Harold Cooley || Nay || July 7, 1934 || December 30, 1966 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ralph Scott || Nay || January 3, 1957 || January 3, 1967 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Horace Kornegay || Nay || January 3, 1961 || January 3, 1969 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Alton A. Lennon || Nay || January 3, 1957 || January 3, 1973 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Basil L. Whitener || Nay || January 3, 1957 || January 3, 1969 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Roy Arthur Taylor || Nay || June 25, 1960 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot;|South Carolina || Lucius Mendel Rivers || Nay || January 3, 1941 || December 28, 1970 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Albert Watson || Nay || January 3, 1963 || January 3, 1971 || June 15, 1965 || Republican (since 1962)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|William Dorn || Nay || January 3, 1951 || December 31, 1974 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert Ashmore || Nay || June 2, 1953 || January 3, 1969 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John McMillan || Nay || January 3, 1939 || January 3, 1973 || Never || Republican (since early 1960s)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;6&amp;quot;|Tennessee || Joseph E. Evins || Nay || January 3, 1947 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Richard Fulton || Yea || January 3, 1963 || August 14, 1975 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ross Bass || Yea || January 3, 1955 || November 3, 1964 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Thomas J. Murray || Nay || January 3, 1943 || December 30, 1966 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert A. Everett || Nay || February 1, 1958 || January 26, 1969 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Clifford Davis || Nay || February 14, 1940 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;21&amp;quot;|Texas || Joseph R. Pool || Nay || January 3, 1963 || July 14, 1968 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Wright Patman || Nay || March 4, 1929 || March 7, 1976 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Jack Brooks || Yea || January 3, 1953 || January 3, 1995 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Lindley Beckworth || Nay ||January 3, 1957 || January 3, 1967 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Herbert Ray Roberts || Nay || January 30, 1962 || January 3, 1981 || Never || Democrat (switched to Republican in 2004)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Olin Earl Teague || Nay || August 24, 1946 || December 31, 1978 || Never || Democrat (switched to Republican in 1983)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Dowdy || Nay || September 23, 1952 || January 3, 1973 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Albert Richard Thomas || Yea || January 3, 1937 || February 15, 1966 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Clark Thompson || Nay || August 23, 1947 || December 30, 1966 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|James Jarrell Pickle || Yea || December 21, 1963 || January 3, 1995 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|William Poage || Nay || January 3, 1937 || December 31, 1978 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|James C. Wright, Jr. || Nay || January 3, 1955 || June 30, 1989 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Graham Purcell, Jr. || Nay || January 27, 1962 || January 3, 1973 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John A. Young || Nay || January 3, 1957 || January 3, 1979 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Joseph Kilgore || Nay || January 3, 1955 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Omar Burleson || Nay || January 3, 1947 || December 31, 1978 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Walter E. Rogers || No vote || January 3, 1951 || January 3, 1967 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|George Mahon || Nay || January 3, 1935 || January 3, 1979 || Never || Democrat (switched to Republican in 1985)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Henry B. González || Yea || November 4, 1961 || January 3, 1999 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ovie Clark Fisher || Nay || January 3, 1943 || December 31, 1974 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Robert R. Casey || Nay || January 3, 1959 || January 22, 1976 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;8&amp;quot;|Virginia || Thomas Downing || Nay || January 3, 1959 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Porter Hardy || Nay || January 3, 1947 || January 3, 1969 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Julian Gary || Nay || March 6, 1945 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Watkins Abbitt || Nay || February 17, 1948 || January 3, 1973 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|William Tuck || Nay || April 14, 1953 || January 3, 1969 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John Marsh || Nay || January 3, 1963 || January 3, 1971 || 1980s || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Howard Smith || Nay || March 4, 1931 || January 3, 1967 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|William Pat Jennings || Nay || January 3, 1955 || January 3, 1967 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rowspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;|West Virginia || Harley Staggers || Yea || January 3, 1949 || January 3, 1981 || Never || Republican&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|John M. Slack, Jr. || Yea || January 3, 1963 || March 17, 1980 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kenneth Hechler || Yea || January 3, 1959 || January 3, 1977 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Maude Elizabeth Kee || Yea || July 17, 1951 || January 3, 1965 || Never || Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many progressive [[Revisionist history|revisionist historians]] try to point to Senator [[Strom Thurmond]] as proof to their claim of some mass &amp;quot;party switch&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-republican-partys-race-problem-and-strom-thurmonds-legacy The Republican Party’s Race Problem and Strom Thurmond’s Legacy]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, because Thurmond was among very few who did, he is an outlier.  Conversely, several notable Senators remained as Democrats well into the 1970s. Two were [[Albert Gore, Sr.]] and [[J. William Fulbright]], the latter of which was a mentor to future President [[Bill Clinton]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some liberal sources including ''[[The Guardian]]''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/28/republicans-party-of-civil-rights Were Republicans really the party of civil rights in the 1960s?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[Vox Media]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s8VOM8ET1WU How the Republican Party went from Lincoln to Trump]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; attempt to deceptively whitewash the historical context of the 60s by claiming that the issue was much more attributed to region than party, showing statistics that Northern Democrats were more supportive of civil rights than Northern Republicans and likewise for the South. However, it's important to note that ''there were very few Southern Republicans during the time in contrast to a higher proportion of Southern Democrats, deeming such an outlook entirely misleading.'' Furthermore, as the Republican Party barely held any significant political power in the South during the time, the few congressional Republicans in the area who opposed civil rights were mostly outliers compared to the party's overall strong backing of civil rights.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Party platforms==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Democrat plantation}}&lt;br /&gt;
===Early history===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cons4 (2).jpg|right|300px|thumb|The Democratic Platform Is For The White Man, 1869]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Democratic party}}&lt;br /&gt;
Despite sleazy left-wing smears, it is important to note that the first Republican Party platform in 1856 advocated &amp;quot;inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; in the idea that it applied to everyone and not just some.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/republican-party-platform-1856 Republican Party Platform of 1856]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In addition, it stressed the violations of due process, the right to bear arms, the right to freedom of speech, all that were &amp;quot;done with the knowledge, sanction, and procurement of the present National Administration&amp;quot;.  It also rejected rule by the sheer mighty, scoffing it as shameful and dishonoring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Important notes to mention about the similarities between the [[Republican Party]] at the time of its foundation and in its present day are more numerous than many [[liberal]] Democrats would like to admit. Founded as a party opposed to [[slavery]] on the basis of universal human rights regardless of certain physical traits and characteristics, Republicans continue using the argument in the present day against [[abortion]] (see: [[Slavery and abortion]]). In addition, many early Republicans had recognized the [[right to bear arms]] as being vital, including black anti-lynching advocates such as [[Ida B. Wells]], who said: {{cquote|''The lesson this teaches and which every Afro-American should ponder well, is that a Winchester rifle should have a place of honor in every black home, and it should be used for that protection which the law refuses to give.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.azquotes.com/quote/1445309 Ida B. Quote: The lesson...]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} On the issue of trade, Republicans then supported economic protectionist measures and higher tariffs on foreign goods, as similar to the current [[Economic nationalism|economic nationalist]] wing of the Republican Party today led by [[Donald Trump]]. The early Republicans criticized [[polygamy]] in their first party platform as well, calling it a &amp;quot;twin relic of barbarism&amp;quot;, similar to their opposition to the [[homosexual agenda]] today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Southern Manifesto]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist1904|group=note}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Terms]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Darth Umbris</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Republican_Party&amp;diff=1718225</id>
		<title>Republican Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Republican_Party&amp;diff=1718225"/>
		<updated>2021-01-03T18:34:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Darth Umbris: Correcting the years and timespan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{AmericanPoliticalParty&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_name = Republican Party&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_articletitle = Republican Party (United States)&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_logo = [[Image:Cjjfdjfty.png|200px|&amp;quot;Republican Party Elephant&amp;quot; logo]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | website = [http://www.gop.com www.gop.com]&lt;br /&gt;
 | headquarters = 310 K Street SE&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Washington, D.C.]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;20003 &lt;br /&gt;
 | chairman = [[Ronna Romney McDaniel]]   &lt;br /&gt;
 | housespeaker = [[Paul Ryan]] &lt;br /&gt;
 | houseleader = [[Kevin McCarthy]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | senateleader = [[Mitch McConnell]] &lt;br /&gt;
 | foundation = March 20, 1854&lt;br /&gt;
 | ideology = [[Conservative|Conservatism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Classical Liberalism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Neoconservatism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Liberal conservatism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Libertarianism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Right-wing populism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Paleoconservatism&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Nationalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | fiscalpolicy = [[Free Market]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | socialpolicy = [[Conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | international = [[International Democrat Union]]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;[[Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe]] (regional partner)&lt;br /&gt;
 | colors = [[Red states and blue states|Red]] (unofficial)&lt;br /&gt;
 | footnotes =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Republican Party''' ('''R''') or informally the '''GOP''' (short for Grand Old Party), is one of the two major political parties in the [[United States]] and founded on the principles of [[equality]] and &amp;quot;one person, one vote.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Party is the only major U.S. political party that is [[pro-life]].  The Republican Party is also pro-[[free enterprise]], pro-religious liberty, pro-[[Second Amendment]], and pro-[[traditional marriage]], while opposing the defunding of police departments.  At its first national convention, in 1856, the Republican Party platform stated, &amp;quot;It is the duty of Congress to prohibit in the territories those twin relics of barbarism, polygamy and slavery.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ushistory.org/gop/convention_1856.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Party was created in 1854 by anti-slavery activists and has always stood for equal rights and the dignity of the individual. It soon swept to control of all the northern states, and in 1860 elected [[Abraham Lincoln]] president.  The South seceded, and the Union side of the [[American Civil War]] was directed by Lincoln and the new party, with help from &amp;quot;War Democrats.&amp;quot; The GOP (as it was increasingly made up of veterans of the GAR or Grand Army of the Republic) dominated the elections of the [[Third Party System]] (1854–1896) as well as the [[Fourth Party System]] or Progressive Era (1896–1932). However, the Democrats built a liberal [[New Deal Coalition]] under President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]], and dominated the [[Fifth Party System]] (1932–1968), with the GOP only electing [[Dwight D. Eisenhower]] in that era. The Sixth Party System, since 1968, has been dominated by the GOP. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unable to suppress minority voting rights for another century, in the 1960s Democrats sought to make Blacks dependent for food and housing on the Democratic party again with the [[War on Poverty]], as Blacks had been in the pre-Civil War plantation system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://mises.org/wire/welfare-state-did-what-slavery-couldnt-do The Welfare State Did What Slavery Couldn't Do], Wendy McElroy, Mises Institute, 09/09/2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Throughout the [[voter suppression]] of the [[Jim Crow]] era and beyond the War on Poverty, Democrats were always determined that the party that freed the slaves would not become beneficiaries of the [[Freedmen]]'s vote. The system of economic co-dependency and [[patronage]] between white liberal racists and African Americans that existed for centuries was renewed in the mid-1960s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lyndon-johnson-civil-rights-racism/amp Lyndon Johnson was a civil rights hero. But also a racist], by Adam Serwer, MSNBC, 04/11/14&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Only now the system of co-dependency was paid for with federal money rather than the [[private sector]] plantation system of the pre-Civil War era.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blackandblondemedia.com/2010/03/19/the-dixiecrat-myth/ The Dixiecrat Myth]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
20 of the 30 US Presidents since 1861 have been Republicans and since that same year, a Republican has won 24 of the last 38 presidential elections. The party's most recent candidates [[Free Soil]] Republicans [[Donald Trump]] of [[New York]], along with his running mate, [[Indiana]] Governor [[Mike Pence]], won the [[2016 presidential election]] against Southern Democrat challengers [[Hillary Clinton]] of [[Arkansas]] and her running mate [[Tim Kaine]] of [[Virginia]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is important to vote for someone who's more conservative on the issues rather than for someone who represents their party only by name due to the fact some Republicans are less conservative than typical Republicans (see: [[RINO]]). &lt;br /&gt;
[[image:The_off_year_nast_1877.jpg|right|thumb|1877 Thomas Nast drawing of the Republican elephant.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Symbol ==&lt;br /&gt;
The official symbol of the Republican Party is the elephant.  Although the elephant had occasionally been associated with the party earlier, a political cartoon by [[Thomas Nast]], published in ''Harper's Weekly'' on November 7, 1874, is considered the first important use of the symbol.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.harpweek.com/09Cartoon/BrowseByDateCartoon.asp?Year=2003&amp;amp;Month=November&amp;amp;Date=7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the early 20th century, the traditional symbol of the Republican party in some Midwestern states was the eagle, as opposed to the Democratic cock (rooster). The eagle still appears on Indiana ballots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A political term referring to the party is &amp;quot;G.O.P.&amp;quot;, which was originally an acronym of &amp;quot;Grand Old Party&amp;quot;. The term was coined in 1875.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ideology==&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, the fundamental philosophy and political ideals of the Republican Party are founded on the idea that societal health is rooted in personal responsibility and actions. The Republican Party holds the belief that all material things are earned, not owed. This is seen most often in the party's push for lower taxes. This is fought for in an attempt to treat all citizens equally despite income, race, gender, or religion. They also see taxes as a drag on the economy, and believe private spending is usually more efficient than public spending.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Republicans also show concerns about having big government in charge of such vital issues as food, shelter, or health care, as they believe the private sector and/or the individual are better suited to control their own lives. President [[Ronald Reagan]] who became a Republican in the early 1960s after being a [[New Deal]]er at one time, has been quoted as saying &amp;quot;Government is not the solution, it is the problem.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The party tends to hold both [[conservative]] and [[Libertarianism|libertarian]] stances on social and economic issues respectively. Major policies that the party has recently supported include a conservative foreign policy, including [[War on Terror]], liberating of [[Afghanistan]] and [[Iraq]], and strong support for democracy, especially in the [[Middle East]]. Many party members and politicians have shown a distrust of the [[United Nations]] due to the organization's incompetent bureaucracy, anti-capitalist undertone, corruption on the [[Security Council]] and in UN humanitarian programs. Along with demanding radical reforms in the UN, many Republican politicians also opposes the Kyoto Protocol due the protocol's unfair application to certain countries (especially the United States) and the fact that it prevents economic growth and slows the reduction of poverty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Party generally supported free trade to promote democracy, especially [[NAFTA]] and [[CAFTA]]. It is responsible for a series of across-the-board tax cuts since 2001 that have bolstered the economy and reduced the punitive aspect of the income tax. It has sought business deregulation, reduction of environmental regulations that restrict fair use of land and property, and other policies that are pro-capitalism. It supports gun ownership rights, and enterprise zones (low taxes for investing in poverty areas). On social issues the majority of its national and state candidates usually favor the death penalty, call for stronger state-level control on access to [[abortion]], support a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage at the federal level and by the states, favor faith-based charitable initiatives, support school choice and homeschooling, social welfare benefit reform, and oppose reverse racism, such as racial quotas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years the party has called for much stronger accountability in the public schools, especially through the &amp;quot;No Child Left behind Act&amp;quot; of 2001 (which also increased [[federal funding]] for schools). The party is split on the issue of federally funding embryonic stem cell research that involves the cloning and killing of human embryos. Many in the party think it is unethical to force taxpayers who believe this type of research is morally wrong to finance it. Historically Republicans have had a strong belief in [[individualism]], limited government, and business entrepreneurship.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, the Republican party has downplayed its emphasis on small government. Under the administration of [[George W. Bush]], the federal government has been expanded to record levels, surpassing even the Great Depression era.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dhs.gov/index.shtm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, the Bush administration has acted to nationalize the country's banking institutions in an effort to stymie the decline of the U.S. economy&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12078933&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''''In 2016, the Republican Party adopted the most pro-life party platform in its entire history, with strong language recognizing the right to life of unborn human beings and condemning [[Planned Parenthood]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ertelt, Steven; Bilger, Micaiah (July 18, 2016). [https://www.lifenews.com/2016/07/18/republicans-adopt-most-pro-life-platform-ever-condemning-abortion-and-planned-parenthood/ Republicans Adopt Most Pro-Life Platform Ever Condemning Abortion and Planned Parenthood]. ''LifeNews.com''. Retrieved December 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;''''' Between 1995 and 2018, the GOP become significantly more pro-life on the issue.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, Thomas D. (October 20, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/20/pew-republicans-trend-pro-life-dems-align-abortion-industry/ Pew: Republicans Trend Increasingly Pro-Life as Democrats Align with Abortion Industry]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved October 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to the claims of liberals and Democrats, the GOP better represent the poor in the U.S., while Democrats represent the wealthy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Starr, Penny (October 21, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/21/economic-profile-50-states-republicans-represent-poor-democrats-rich/ Economic Profile of 50 States Reveals Republicans Represent the Poor, Democrats the Rich]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved October 21, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:GOP-presidents.jpg|thumb|300px|GOP Presidents by Andy Thomas; clockwise from right: Nixon, Ford, Lincoln, GHW Bush, Reagan, GW Bush, Eisenhower, Teddy Roosevelt]]&lt;br /&gt;
The party began in 1854, at the start of the [[Third Party System]]. The '''GOP''' (or &amp;quot;Grand Old Party&amp;quot; as it was nicknamed after 1880 by veterans of the Grand Army of the Republic, the '''GAR''') dominated national politics as the victors of the [[American Civil War]], including most of the [[Fourth Party System]] until 1932. Then the [[Fifth Party System]] (or &amp;quot;New Deal Coalition&amp;quot;) was dominant until the late 1960s.  Since 1968 the GOP has won 8 of 13 presidential elections (losing in 1976, 1992, 1996, 2008 and 2012). Its great rival is the party of segregation, slavery and Jim Crow, the [[Democratic Party#History|Democrat Party]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Third Party System: 1854–1896===&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican party began as a spontaneous grassroots protest against the [[Kansas-Nebraska Act]] of 1854, which allowed slavery into western territories where it had been forbidden by earlier compromises.  The creation of the new party, along with the death of the [[Whig Party]], realigned American politics. The central issues were new, as were the voter alignments, and the balance of power in Congress. The central issues became slavery, race, civil war and the reconstruction of the Union into a more powerful nation, with rules changed that gave the vote to Blacks and former slaves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Issues: Slavery====&lt;br /&gt;
Republican activists denounced the Kansas-Nebraska act as proof of the power of the [[Slave Power]]—the powerful class of slaveholders who were conspiring to control the federal government and to spread slavery nationwide. The name &amp;quot;Republican&amp;quot; gained such favor in 1854 because &amp;quot;[[Republicanism, U.S.|republicanism]]&amp;quot; was the paramount political value the new party meant to uphold. The name also echoed the former Jeffersonian party of the [[First Party System]]. The party founders adopted the name &amp;quot;Republican&amp;quot; to indicate it was the carrier of &amp;quot;republican&amp;quot; beliefs about civic virtue, and opposition to aristocracy and corruption.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gould (2003) pp 14-15; republicanism is explored in depth by Foner (1970).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Lincoln seated.jpg|thumb|220px|right|Abraham Lincoln was the first Republican president]]&lt;br /&gt;
Two small cities of the Yankee diaspora, Ripon, Wisconsin, and Jackson, Michigan, claim the birthplace honors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;There is also a myth that the town of Exeter, New Hampshire was first by six months, but nothing came of the secret meeting there and scholars dismiss the claim.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ripon held the first county convention on March 20, 1854. Jackson held the first statewide convention where delegates on July 6, 1854, declared their new party opposed to the expansion of slavery into new territories and selected a statewide slate of candidates. The Midwest took the lead in forming state party tickets, while the eastern states lagged a year or so. There were no efforts to organize the party in the South, apart from a few areas adjacent to free states. The new party was sectional, based in the northeast and northern Midwest—areas with a strong Yankee presence. It had only scattered support in slave states before the Civil War.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;There was some strength in border cities such as St. Louis, Louisville, Wheeling, and Baltimore.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first presidential nomination in 1856 when to an obscure western explorer [[John C. Fremont]], as the party crusaded against the Slave Power with the slogan, &amp;quot;Free Soil, Free Labor, Free men, Fremont and victory!&amp;quot;  Democrats warned darkly that disunion and Civil War would result.  The remnants of the Know Nothing movement prevented the new party from sweeping the North, and the Democrats elected [[James Buchanan]]. By 1858 the Know Nothings were gone and the Republicans swept the North.  The 1860 election seemed a certain victory, for the party had majorities in states with a majority of the electoral votes.  In the event, the opposition split three ways, and [[Abraham Lincoln]] coasted to an easy victory, carrying 18 states with 190 electoral votes, while the opposition carried 15 states (mostly in the South) with 123 electoral votes. Lincoln had 1.9 million popular votes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Modernization====&lt;br /&gt;
Besides opposition to slavery, the new party put forward a modernizing vision—emphasizing higher education, banking, railroads, industry and cities, while promising free homesteads to farmers. It vigorously argued that free-market labor was superior to slavery and the very foundation of civic virtue and true American values - this is the &amp;quot;Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men&amp;quot; ideology explored by historian Eric Foner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Foner, Eric. ''Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men''. 1993.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Republicans absorbed the previous traditions of its members, most of whom had been [[Whig Party|Whigs]], and some of whom had been Democrats or members of third parties (especially the [[Free Soil Party]] and Know-Nothings (American Party). Many [[U.S. Democratic Party, history|Democrats]] who joined up were rewarded with governorships.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;They included [[Nathaniel P. Banks]] of Massachusetts, [[Kinsley Bingham]] of Michigan, [[William H. Bissell]] of Illinois, [[Salmon P. Chase]] of Ohio, [[Hannibal Hamlin]] of Maine, [[Samuel J. Kirkwood]] of Iowa, [[Ralph Metcalf]] of New Hampshire, [[Lot Morrill]] of Maine, and [[Alexander Randall]] of Wisconsin).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or seats in the U.S. Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The senators included Bingham and Hamlin, as well as [[James R. Doolittle]] of Wisconsin, [[John P. Hale]] of New Hampshire, [[Preston King]] of New York, [[Lyman Trumbull]] of Illinois, and [[David Wilmot]] of Pennsylvania.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Since its inception, its chief opposition has been the Democratic Party, but the amount of flow back and forth of prominent politicians between the two parties was quite high from 1854 to 1896.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Ethnocultural voting====&lt;br /&gt;
Historians have explored the ethnocultural foundations of the party, along the line that ethnic and religious groups set the moral standards for their members, who then carried those standards into politics.  The churches also provided social networks that politicians used to sign up voters.  The pietistic churches, heavily influenced by the revivals of the [[Second Great Awakening]], emphasized the duty of the Christian to purge sin from society.  Sin took many forms—alcoholism, polygamy and slavery became special targets for the Republicans. The Yankees, who dominated New England, much of upstate New York, and much of the upper Midwest were the strongest supporters of the new party.  This was especially true for the pietistic Congregationalists and Presbyterians among them and (during the war), the Methodists, along with Scandinavian Lutherans.  The Quakers were a small tight-knit group that was heavily Republican.  The liturgical churches (Roman Catholic, Episcopal, German Lutheran), by contrast, largely rejected the moralism of the GOP; most of their adherents voted Democratic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kleppner (1979) has extensive detail on the voting behavior of groups.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Politics 1854–1860====&lt;br /&gt;
[[John C. Frémont]] ran as the first Republican nominee for [[President of the United States|President]] in 1856, using the [[political slogan]]: &amp;quot;[[United States Free Soil Party#Positions|Free soil, free labor, free speech, free men]], Frémont.&amp;quot; Although Frémont's bid was unsuccessful, the party showed a strong base. It dominated in New England, New York and the northern Midwest, and had a strong presence in the rest of the North. It had almost no support in the South, where it was roundly denounced in 1856-60 as a divisive force that threatened civil war. The election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 ended the domination of the fragile coalition of pro-slavery southern Democrats and conciliatory northern Democrats which had existed since the days of [[Andrew Jackson]]. Instead, a new era of Republican dominance based in the industrial and agricultural north ensued. Republicans still often refer to their party as the &amp;quot;party of Lincoln&amp;quot; in honor of the first Republican President.&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Third Party System}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Civil War: 1861–1865====&lt;br /&gt;
Lincoln proved brilliantly successful in uniting the factions of his party to fight for the Union.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Goodwyn 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However he usually fought the [[Radical Republicans]] who demanded harsher measures. Most Democrats at first were [[War Democrats]], and supportive until the fall of 1862. When Lincoln added the abolition of slavery as a war goal, many war Democrats became &amp;quot;peace Democrats.&amp;quot; All the state Republican parties accepted the antislavery goal except Kentucky. In Congress, the party passed major legislation to promote rapid modernization, including a national banking system, high tariffs, an income tax, many excise taxes, paper money issued without backing (&amp;quot;greenbacks&amp;quot;), a huge national debt, homestead laws, and aid to education and agriculture. The Republicans denounced the peace-oriented Democrats as [[Copperheads]] and won enough [[War Democrats]] to maintain their majority in 1862; in 1864, they formed a coalition with many War Democrats as the &amp;quot;National Union Party&amp;quot; which reelected Lincoln easily, then folded back into the Republican party. During the war, upper-middle-class men in major cities formed [[Union League]]s, to promote and help finance the war effort.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Reconstruction: Blacks, Carpetbaggers and Scalawags====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kkk-carpetbagger-cartoon.jpg|left|300px|thumb|A cartoon threatening that the KKK will lynch [[scalawag]]s (left) and [[carpetbagger]]s (right) on March 4, 1869, the day President Grant takes office. Tuscaloosa, Alabama, Independent Monitor, September 1, 1868. A full-scale scholarly history analyzes the cartoonː Guy W. Hubbs, Searching for Freedom after the Civil War: Klansman, Carpetbagger, Scalawag, and Freedman (2015).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hubbs, Guy W. (May 15, 2015). [https://books.google.com/books?id=KIVoCQAAQBAJ&amp;amp;source=gbs_navlinks_s &amp;quot;Searching for Freedom after the Civil War: Klansman, Carpetbagger, Scalawag, and Freedman&amp;quot;]. University Alabama Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Reconstruction]], how to deal with the ex-Confederates and the freed slaves, or [[Freedmen]], were the major issues. By 1864, [[Radical Republicans]] controlled Congress and demanded more aggressive action against slavery, and more vengeance toward the Confederates. Lincoln held them off, but just barely. Republicans at first welcomed President [[Andrew Johnson]]; the Radicals thought he was one of them and would take a hard line in punishing the South. Johnson, however, broke with them and formed a loose alliance with moderate Republicans and Democrats. The showdown came in the Congressional elections of 1866, in which the Radicals won a sweeping victory and took full control of Reconstruction, passing key laws over the veto. Johnson was impeached by the House, but acquitted by the Senate. With the election of [[Ulysses S. Grant]] in 1868, the Radicals had control of Congress, the party and the Army, and attempted to build a solid Republican base in the South using the votes of [[Freedmen]], [[Scalawags]] and [[Carpetbaggers]], supported directly by U.S. Army detachments. Republicans all across the South formed local clubs called [[Union League]]s that effectively mobilized the voters, discussed issues, and when necessary fought off [[Ku Klux Klan]] attacks. Thousands died on both sides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Grant supported radical reconstruction programs in the South, the 14th Amendment, and equal civil and voting rights for the freedmen. Most of all he was the hero of the war veterans, who marched to his tune. The party had become so large that factionalism was inevitable; it was hastened by Grant's tolerance of high levels of corruption typified by the [[Whiskey Ring]]. The &amp;quot;[[Liberal Republican]]s&amp;quot; split off in 1872 on the grounds that it was time to declare the war finished and bring the troops home. Many of the founders of the GOP joined the movement, as did many powerful newspaper editors. They nominated [[Horace Greeley]], who gained unofficial Democratic support, but was defeated in a landslide. The depression of 1873 energized the Democrats. They won control of the House and formed &amp;quot;[[Redeemers|Redeemer]]&amp;quot; coalitions which recaptured control of each southern state, in some cases using threats and violence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconstruction came to an end when the contested election of 1876 was awarded by a special [[Electoral Commission (United States)|electoral commission]] to Republican [[Rutherford B. Hayes]] who promised, through the unofficial [[Compromise of 1877]], to withdraw federal troops from control of the last three southern states. The region then became the [[Solid South]], giving overwhelming majorities of its electoral votes and Congressional seats to the Democrats until 1964. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In terms of racial issues, &amp;quot;White Republicans as well as Democrats solicited black votes but reluctantly rewarded blacks with nominations for office only when necessary, even then reserving the more choice positions for whites. The results were predictable: these half-a-loaf gestures satisfied neither black nor white Republicans. The fatal weakness of the Republican party in Alabama, as elsewhere in the South, was its inability to create a biracial political party.  And while in power even briefly, they failed to protect their members from Democratic terror. Alabama Republicans were forever on the defensive, verbally and physically.&amp;quot; [Woolfolk p 134]  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Social pressure eventually forced most [[Scalawags]] to join the conservative/Democratic Redeemer coalition. A minority persisted and formed the &amp;quot;tan&amp;quot; half of the &amp;quot;Black and Tan&amp;quot; Republican party, a minority in every southern state after 1877. (DeSantis 1998)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gilded Age: 1877–1894====&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;GOP&amp;quot; (as it was now nicknamed) split into factions in the late 1870s. The Stalwarts, followers of Senator Conkling, defended the [[spoils system]]. The Half-Breeds, who followed Senator [[James G. Blaine]] of Maine, pushed for [[Civil service system|civil service reform]]. Independents who opposed the spoils system altogether were called &amp;quot;[[Mugwumps]]&amp;quot;. In 1884 they rejected [[James G. Blaine]] as corrupt and helped elect Democrat [[Grover Cleveland]]; most returned to the party by 1888. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the Northern post-bellum economy boomed with heavy and light industry, railroads, mines, and fast-growing cities, as well as prosperous agriculture, the Republicans took credit and promoted policies to keep the fast growth going. They supported [[free enterprise]] generally, hard money (i.e. the [[gold standard]]), high [[tariff]]s, and high pensions for Union veterans. By 1890, however, the Republicans had agreed to reform with the [[Sherman Anti-Trust Act]] and the [[Interstate Commerce Commission]], in response to complaints of large enterprise [[monopoly]] control by small business owners and farmers. The high [[McKinley Tariff]] of 1890 hurt the party and the Democrats swept to a landslide in the off-year elections, even defeating McKinley himself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Ethnocultural Voters: pietistic Republicans versus liturgical Democrats====&lt;br /&gt;
From 1860 to 1912, the Republicans took advantage of the association of the Democrats with &amp;quot;Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion&amp;quot;. Rum stood for the liquor interests and the tavern keepers, in contrast to the GOP, which had a strong dry element. &amp;quot;Romanism&amp;quot; meant Catholics, especially Irish Americans, who ran the Democrat Party in every big city, and whom the Republicans denounced for political corruption. &amp;quot;Rebellion&amp;quot; stood for the Confederates who tried to break the Union in 1861, and the [[Copperheads]] in the North who sympathized with them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demographic trends aided the Democrats, as the German and Irish Catholic immigrants were Democrats, and outnumbered the English and Scandinavian Republicans. During the 1880s and 1890s, the Republicans struggled against the Democrats' efforts, winning several close elections and losing two to Grover Cleveland (in [[United States presidential election, 1884|1884]] and [[United States presidential election, 1892|1892]]). Religious lines were sharply drawn [Kleppner 1979]. Methodists, Congregationalists, Presbyterians, Scandinavian Lutherans and other pietists in the North were tightly linked to the GOP. In sharp contrast, liturgical groups, especially the Catholics, Episcopalians, and German Lutherans, looked to the Democratic party for protection from pietistic moralism, especially prohibition.  Both parties cut across the class structure, with the Democrats more bottom-heavy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cultural issues, especially prohibition and foreign language schools became important because of the sharp religious divisions in the electorate. In the North, about 50% of the voters were pietistic Protestants (Methodists, Scandinavian Lutherans, Presbyterians, Congregationalists, Disciples of Christ) who believed the government should be used to reduce social sins, such as drinking. Liturgical churches (Roman Catholics, German Lutherans, Episcopalians) comprised over a quarter of the vote and wanted the government to stay out of the morality business. Prohibition debates and referenda heated up politics in most states over a period of decades, as national prohibition was finally passed in 1918 (and repealed in 1932), serving as a major issue between the wet Democrats and the dry GOP.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See  Kleppner (1979)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fourth Party System: 1896–1932: The Progressive Era ===&lt;br /&gt;
The election of [[William McKinley]] in 1896 was a realigning election that changed the balance of power, and introduced new rules, new issues and new leaders. It did not, however, see the emergence of a new major party.  The Republican sweep of the 1894 Congressional elections presaged the McKinley landslide of 1896, which was repeated in 1900, thus locking the GOP in full control of the national government and most northern state governments. The GOP made major gains as well in the border states.  The [[Fourth Party System]] was dominated by Republican presidents, with the exception of the two terms of Democrat segregationist [[Woodrow Wilson]], 1912-1920. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====McKinley and realignment====&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley promised that high tariffs would end the severe hardship caused by the [[Panic of 1893]], and that the GOP would guarantee [[pluralism]] in which all groups would benefit. He denounced [[William Jennings Bryan]], the Democratic nominee, as a dangerous radical whose plans for &amp;quot;Free Silver&amp;quot; at 16-1 (or [[Bimetallism]]) would bankrupt the economy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McKinley relied heavily on industry and the middle classes for his support and cemented the Republicans as the party of [[liberty]]; his campaign manager, Ohio's [[Mark Hanna]], developed a detailed plan for getting contributions from the business world, and McKinley outspent his rival [[William Jennings Bryan]] by a large margin.  McKinley was the first president to promote [[pluralism]], arguing that prosperity would be shared by all ethnic and religious groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Progressive Republicans====&lt;br /&gt;
At the dawn of the 20th century, the Republican Party was regulating monopolies and promoting civil service reform, with progressivism finding a home within the GOP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Theodore Roosevelt]], who became president in 1901, had the most dynamic personality in the nation.  Roosevelt had to contend with men like Senator [[Mark Hanna]], whom he outmaneuvered to gain control of the convention in 1904 that renominated him. More difficult to handle was conservative House Speaker [[Joseph Gurney Cannon]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When [[Booker T. Washington]]'s autobiography, ''Up From Slavery'', was published in 1901, it became a bestseller and had a major impact on the African American community, and its friends and allies. Washington in 1901 was the first African-American ever invited to the White House as the guest of President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] &amp;amp;ndash; white Democrats complained loudly, although Washington remained as an advisor to Roosevelt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larry Schweikart and Michael Allen, &amp;quot;A Patriot's History of the United States&amp;quot; (2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt achieved modest legislative gains in terms of railroad legislation and pure food laws. He was more successful in Court, bringing antitrust suits that broke up the [[Northern Securities]] trust and [[Standard Oil]].  Roosevelt moved left in his last two years in office but was unable to pass major Square Deal proposals.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt did succeed in naming his successor Secretary of War [[William Howard Taft]] who easily defeated Bryan again in 1908.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Progressive insurgents vs. Conservatives====&lt;br /&gt;
The GOP was divided between insurgents and stand-patters (liberals and conservatives, to use 21st-century terms). [[Theodore Roosevelt]] was an enormously popular president (1901–1909), and he transferred the office to [[William Howard Taft]]. Taft, however, did not have TR's enormous popularity nor his ability to bring rival factions together. When Taft sided with the standpatters under Speaker [[Joe Cannon]] and Senate leader [[Nelson Aldrich]], the insurgents revolted. Led by [[George Norris]] the insurgents took control of the House away from Cannon and imposed a new system whereby committee chairmanships depended on seniority (years of membership on the committee), rather than party loyalty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tariff issue was pulling the GOP apart. Roosevelt tried to postpone the issue but Taft had to meet it head on in 1909 with the [[Payne-Aldrich Tariff Act]]. Eastern conservatives led by [[Nelson A. Aldrich]] wanted high tariffs on manufactured goods (especially woolens), while Midwesterners called for low tariffs.  Aldrich tricked them by lowering the tariff on farm products, which outraged the farmers. In a stunning comeback, the Democrats won control of the House in  1910, as the GOP rift between insurgents and conservatives widened.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt sided with the insurgents and, after long indecision, decided to run against Taft for the 1912 nomination. Roosevelt had to steamroll over insurgent Senator [[Robert LaFollette]] of Wisconsin, turning an ally into an enemy. Taft outmaneuvered Roosevelt and controlled the convention. Roosevelt walked out and formed a third party, the &amp;quot;Progressive&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;Bull Moose&amp;quot; party. Very few officeholders supported him, and the new party collapsed by 1914. With the GOP vote divided in half, Democrat [[Woodrow Wilson]] easily won the 1912 election, and was narrowly reelected in 1916.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the defeat of Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive Bull Moose party, along with the election of Woodrow Wilson, the parties switched progressive leadership, and the Democrat Party has been the party of big government ever since.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====State and local politics====&lt;br /&gt;
The Republicans welcomed the [[Progressive Era]] at the state and local level.  The first important reform mayor was [[Hazen S. Pingree]] of Detroit (1890–97) who was elected governor of Michigan in 1896. In New York City the Republicans joined nonpartisan reformers to battle [[Tammany Hall]], and elected Seth Low (1902–03). Samuel &amp;quot;Golden Rule&amp;quot; Jones was first elected mayor of Toledo as a Republican in 1897, but was re-elected as an independent when his party refused to renominate him.  In Iowa Senator Albert Cummins came up with the &amp;quot;Iowa Idea&amp;quot; that blamed the trust or monopoly problem on the high tariff, angering the eastern industrialists and factory workers. Many Republican civic leaders, following the example of Mark Hanna, were active in the [[National Civic Federation]], which promoted urban reforms and sought to avoid wasteful strikes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Harding-Coolidge-Hoover, 1920–1932====&lt;br /&gt;
The party controlled the presidency throughout the 1920s, running on a limited government platform, opposition to the League of Nations, high tariffs, and promotion of business interests. [[Warren G. Harding]], [[Calvin Coolidge]] and [[Herbert Hoover]] were resoundingly elected in the elections of 1920, 1924 and 1928 as the Democrats were deeply split on prohibition and religion.  Running on a campaign of ''returning to normalcy'', Harding and Coolidge led a repudiation election of both the war as well as the big government progressivism of Woodrow Wilson.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=8iSeCwAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA94 Presidents Harding, Coolidge, and Hoover: Meet the Presidents]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=LziMzAR4eD0C&amp;amp;pg=PA162 The Great American History Fact-finder: The Who, What, Where, When, and why of American History]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Coolidge close.jpg|thumb|100px|left|Calvin Coolidge]]&lt;br /&gt;
The breakaway efforts of Senator [[Robert LaFollette]] in 1924 failed to stop a landslide for Coolidge, and his movement fell apart.  The [[Teapot Dome Scandal]] threatened to hurt the party but Harding died and Coolidge blamed everything on him, as the opposition splintered in 1924. The pro-business policies of the decade seemed to produce unprecedented prosperity—until the Wall Street Crash of 1929 heralded the [[Great Depression]].  Although the party did very well in large cities and among ethnic Catholics in presidential elections of 1920-24, it was unable to hold those gains in 1928. By 1932 the cities—for the first time ever—had become Democratic strongholds. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The African American vote held for Hoover in 1932, but started moving toward Roosevelt. By 1940 the majority of northern blacks were voting Democrat. Southern blacks who could vote (in border states) were split; disenfranchised blacks in the South probably preferred the Republicans. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Great Depression]] cost Hoover the presidency with the [[United States presidential election, 1932|1932 landslide election]] of [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]. Roosevelt's [[New Deal coalition]] controlled American politics for most of the next three decades, excepting the two-term presidency of Republican [[Dwight Eisenhower]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fifth Party System: 1932–1980===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Edward-clark-c.p.o-graham-jackson.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Graham Jackson shedding tears at news of FDR's death. The photo was widely circulated in ''Life'' magazine and interpreted to mean even Republicans cried at the death of FDR. It was later re-circulated in the 1960s to create the myth that [[African American]]s were beneficiaries and part of the New Deal coalition.  New Deal programs often specifically excluded Blacks by legislation passed by the Democrat Congress.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://atlantablackstar.com/2015/02/04/9-ways-franklin-d-roosevelts-new-deal-purposely-excluded-blacks-people/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Minority parties tend to factionalize and after 1936 the GOP split into a conservative faction (dominant in the West and Southeast) and a liberal faction (dominant in the Northeast) &amp;amp;ndash; combined with a residual base of inherited progressive Republicanism active throughout the century. [[United States presidential election, 1936|In 1936]] Kansas governor [[Alf Landon]] and his young followers defeated the [[Herbert Hoover]] faction.  Landon generally supported most New Deal programs, but carried only two states in the Roosevelt landslide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senator [[Robert Taft]] of Ohio represented the Midwestern wing of the party that continued to oppose [[New Deal]] reforms and continued to champion [[isolationism]]. [[Thomas Dewey]], governor of New York, represented the Northeastern wing of the party. Dewey did not reject the New Deal programs but demanded more efficiency, more support for economic growth, and less corruption. He was more willing than Taft to support Britain in 1939-40. After the war, the isolationists wing strenuously opposed the [[United Nations]], and was half-hearted in opposition to world Communism. Senator [[William F. Knowland]] of California, sobriquet ''Senator from Formosa'' (Taiwan).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Dwight Eisenhower]], an internationalist allied with the Dewey wing, challenged Taft in 1952 on foreign policy issues. The two men were not far apart on domestic issues. Eisenhower's victory broke a 20-year Democrat lock on the White House.  Eisenhower did not try to roll back the New Deal, but he did expand the Social Security system and built the Interstate Highway system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conservatives in 1964 made a comeback under the leadership of [[Barry Goldwater]] who defeated [[Nelson Rockefeller]] as the Republican candidate in the [[United States presidential election, 1964|1964 presidential convention]]. Goldwater was strongly opposed to the New Deal and the United Nations, but he rejected isolationism and containment, calling for an aggressive anti-Communist foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any long-term movement toward the GOP was interrupted by the [[Watergate Scandal]], which forced Nixon to resign in 1974 under threat of impeachment. [[Gerald Ford]] succeeded Nixon and gave him a full pardon—thereby giving the Democrats a powerful issue they used to sweep the 1974 off-year elections. Ford never fully recovered, and in 1976 he barely defeated [[Ronald Reagan]] for the nomination. The taint of Watergate and the nation's economic difficulties contributed to the election of Democrat [[Jimmy Carter]] in [[United States presidential election, 1976|1976]], running as a Washington outsider.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Civil Rights====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nixon-and-Martin-Luther-King.png|right|300px|thumb|Dr. Martin Luther King's meeting with Vice President Nixon marked national recognition of King as leader of the civil rights movement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://amgreatness.com/2018/07/29/the-switch-that-never-happened-how-the-south-really-went-gop/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vice President [[Richard Nixon]] invited Dr. [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]] to Washington, D.C., for a meeting on 13 June 1957. This meeting, described by [[Bayard Rustin]] as a “summit conference,” marked national recognition of King's role in the civil rights movement (Rustin, 13 June 1957). Seeking support for a voter registration initiative in the South, King appealed to Nixon to urge Republicans in Congress to pass the 1957 Civil Rights Act and to visit [[the South]] to express support for civil rights. Optimistic about Nixon's commitment to improving race relations in the United States, King told Nixon, “How deeply grateful all people of goodwill are to you for your assiduous labor and dauntless courage in seeking to make the civil rights bill a reality.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Republican Attorney General Herbert Brownell originally proposed the Civil Rights Act of 1957. The bill passed 285-126 in the House with Republicans providing the majority of votes 167–19 and Democrats 118–107.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HR 6127. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1957. PASSED. YEA SUPPORTS PRESIDENT'S POSITION. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/85-1957/h42&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It then passed 72-18 in the Senate, with Republicans again supplying the majority of votes, 43–0 and Democrats voting 29–18. [[John Kennedy]] voted against it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HR. 6127. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1957. PASSED. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/85-1957/s75&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was the first federal civil rights legislation passed by the United States Congress since the Republicans passed the Civil Rights Act of 1875. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Strength of Parties 1977====&lt;br /&gt;
How the Two Parties Stood after the 1976 Election:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=wikitable&lt;br /&gt;
! Party &lt;br /&gt;
! Republican&lt;br /&gt;
! Democrat&lt;br /&gt;
! Independent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Party ID (Gallup)&lt;br /&gt;
| 22%&lt;br /&gt;
| 47%&lt;br /&gt;
| 31%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! House&lt;br /&gt;
| 143&lt;br /&gt;
| 292&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! Senate&lt;br /&gt;
| 38&lt;br /&gt;
| 62&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! % House popular vote nationally&lt;br /&gt;
| 42%&lt;br /&gt;
| 56%&lt;br /&gt;
| 2%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the East&lt;br /&gt;
| 41%&lt;br /&gt;
| 57%&lt;br /&gt;
| 2%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the South&lt;br /&gt;
| 37%&lt;br /&gt;
| 62%&lt;br /&gt;
| 2%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the Midwest&lt;br /&gt;
| 47%&lt;br /&gt;
| 52%&lt;br /&gt;
| 1%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the West&lt;br /&gt;
| 43%&lt;br /&gt;
| 55%&lt;br /&gt;
| 2%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! Governors&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| 37&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! rowspan=2 | State Legislators&lt;br /&gt;
| 2,370&lt;br /&gt;
| 5,128&lt;br /&gt;
| 55&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| 31%&lt;br /&gt;
| 68%&lt;br /&gt;
| 1%&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! State legislature control&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 80&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 * &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the East&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 13&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the South&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| 32&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the Midwest&lt;br /&gt;
| 5&lt;br /&gt;
| 17&lt;br /&gt;
| 1 * &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| align=right | in the West&lt;br /&gt;
| 8&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
! States' one party control&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;of legislature and governorship&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 29&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;*&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;The unicameral Nebraska legislature, in fact controlled by the Republicans, is technically nonpartisan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Source: Everett Carll Ladd Jr. ''Where Have All the Voters Gone? The Fracturing of America's Political Parties'' (1978) p.&amp;amp;nbsp;6&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Moderate Republicans of 1960–80====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Nelson Rockefeller.jpg|thumb|100px|right|Nelson Rockefeller]]&lt;br /&gt;
The term ''Rockefeller Republican'' was used mainly during 1960–80 to designate a faction of the party holding &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; views similar to those of the late [[Nelson Rockefeller]], governor of New York from 1959 to 1974 and vice president under President [[Gerald Ford]] in 1974–77. Before Rockefeller, [[Tom Dewey]], governor of New York 1942–54 and GOP presidential nominee in 1944 and 1948 was the leader. Dwight Eisenhower reflected many of their views. An important leader in the 1950s was Connecticut Republican Senator [[Prescott Bush]], father and grandfather of presidents of [[George H. W. Bush]] and [[George W. Bush]]. After Rockefeller left the national stage in 1976, this faction of the party was more often called &amp;quot;moderate Republicans,&amp;quot; in contrast to the conservatives who rallied to [[Ronald Reagan]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, Rockefeller Republicans were moderate or liberal on domestic and social policies. They favored New Deal programs, including regulation and welfare. They were very strong supporters of civil rights. They were strongly supported by big business on Wall Street (New York City). In fiscal policy, they favored balanced budgets and relatively high tax levels to keep the budget balanced. They sought long-term economic growth through entrepreneurship, not tax cuts. In state politics, they were strong supporters of state colleges and universities, low tuition, and large research budgets. They favored infrastructure improvements, such as highway projects. In foreign policy, they were internationalists and anti-Communists. They felt the best way to counter Communism was sponsoring economic growth (through foreign aid), maintaining a strong military, and keeping close ties to [[NATO]]. Geographically their base was the Northeast, from Pennsylvania to Maine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Suburbia====&lt;br /&gt;
The suburban electorate passed the city electorate in the 1950s, as Eisenhower showed unusual strength there. The history of suburban politics is encapsulated in Nassau County (New York), just east of New York City, where a moderate Republican party machine operated. Despite predictions that the New Deal spelled the demise of the political machine, Nassau provided fertile ground for a party organization that rivaled its big-city Democrat counterparts. The traditionally GOP county underwent a booming expansion during 1945–60, with an influx of new residents, many with previous Democrat Party affiliations. In established villages and new housing developments such as [[Levittown]], under the canny leadership of J. Russel Sprague, the party used patronage and community organizing techniques to build its base among ethnic voters, young people, and new homeowners. The party expanded beyond its white Protestant base, with Italian Americans becoming particularly prominent in party leadership. Sprague was both party leader and county executive. That post was created in 1936 under a new charter engineered by Sprague to update a municipal apparatus unable to meet the infrastructure and development needs of a county that by 1960 had 1.3 million residents. Democrats and reformers had promoted charter revision for decades, and some consolidation of government services did take place. As county &amp;quot;boss,&amp;quot; Sprague ruled with an iron hand. Nassau's pluralities for such candidates as Governor Thomas E. Dewey and President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Sprague's fundraising prowess made him a force in national party politics. He advocated a moderate, middle-of-the-road position that recognized expectations created by the New Deal while criticizing what were claimed to be Democrat excesses. After leaving elective office and party leadership, Sprague became a major campaign issue when the Democrats, in a 1961 historic upset, won the county executive post by both lambasting Sprague, tainted by a racetrack-stock scandal, and criticizing the developer-friendly &amp;quot;Spragueland&amp;quot; regime that had governed Nassau for decades. Soon after Sprague died in 1969, the Nassau GOP regained its control of the county government and reestablished virtual one-party rule until the 1990s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marjorie Freeman Harrison, &amp;quot;Machine Politics Suburban Style: J. Russel Sprague and the Nassau County (New York) Republican Party at Midcentury.&amp;quot;  PhD dissertation Columbia U. 2005. 388 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
DAI 2005 66(5): 1925-A. DA3174807&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An even longer reign of power characterized GOP machine control of Delaware County, Pennsylvania, a rural and suburban area south of Philadelphia. William McClure controlled the GOP from 1875 until his death in 1907; his son John J. McClure, was in control from 1907 until his death in 1965. McLarnon (1998) has four main findings. First, political machines were not confined to big cities; the demographic and political peculiarities of suburban counties lent themselves to continued domination by political machines long after the heyday of the city machine had passed. Secondly, neither the New Deal, immigration restriction, nor the rise of organized labor destroyed all the old Republican machines. Delaware was one of several similar counties in southeastern Pennsylvania where the GOP continued to hold sway throughout the 20th century. Thirdly, not all blacks switched their electoral loyalties to the Democrat Party in 1936. The black population of Chester, Delaware County's industrial city, generally voted Republican for offices below the presidential level. Finally, the citizens of Delaware County supported and continues to support the Republican machine because the machine delivered and continues to deliver those things that the citizens want most. At the beginning of the century, the machine provided food, work, and police protection to Chester's European and black immigrants. During Prohibition, it supplied the county with liquor. Through the Depression, patronage and close alliances with local industrialists kept a significant portion of machine loyalists employed. In the 1950s and 1960s the machine kept taxes low, initiated a war on organized vice, successfully defeated all threats to home rule, and discouraged blacks from settling in historically white communities. The trash was collected, the snow plowed, the streets repaired. The buses ran on time, the playgrounds and parks were clean, and the schools acceptably average. These were the most important concerns of a majority of county's citizens. While the citizens and their concerns changed over time, two things seem to have remained constant: the McClures', and their successors' ability to read and react to the needs of the electorate; and the fact that rarely, if ever, has a desire for honest, democratic government been high on Delaware County voters' list of priorities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Morrison McLarnon, &amp;quot;Ruling Suburbia: A Biography of the McClure Machine of Delaware County, Pennsylvania.&amp;quot;  PhD dissertation U. of Delaware 1998. 616 pp.  DAI 1998 58(12): 4780-A. DA9819160&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first southern states to trend Republican were on the periphery: North Carolina, Virginia, Texas, Tennessee, and Florida. Democrat [[George Wallace]] lost these voters in his 1968 presidential bid. The voters who first migrated to the Republican party were [[suburban]], prosperous New South types. The more Republican the South has become, the less racist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/06/democratic-party-racist-history-mona-charen/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Rise of the right====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:BarryGoldwater.jpg|right|thumb|220px|Barry Goldwater]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barry Goldwater]] crusaded against the Rockefeller Republicans, beating Rockefeller narrowly in the California primary of 1964. That set the stage for a conservative resurgence, based in the South and West, in opposition to the Northeast.  Brennan (1995) stresses that conservatives in the late 1950s and early 1960s had many internal problems to overcome before they could mount an effective challenge to the hegemony of the distrusted Eastern Establishment, typified by [[Nelson A. Rockefeller]]. The conservative movement had some newspapers and magazines (especially [[William F. Buckley]]'s ''National Review'') and one charismatic national leader, Arizona Senator Barry Goldwater. The movement gained momentum once they had established a unity out of diverse elements on the Right with a common commitment to a militant anti-Communism, and once they had succeeded in mobilizing a grassroots base inside a number of state and local organizations in the Sun Belt on behalf of a draft Goldwater campaign in 1960. Although Nixon was acceptable to the conservatives, they worried that he compromised with Rockefeller in 1960. His defeat in 1960 removed a major obstacle and also gave ammunition to those who wanted &amp;quot;a choice, not an echo&amp;quot; (to echo a Goldwater slogan). After 1960 liberals and moderates in the Republican party failed to appreciate the magnitude of the challenge they faced on the grass-roots level. Taking up [[media bias]], they too equated their conservative opponents in the party with the &amp;quot;lunatic fringe&amp;quot; and did not take them seriously until they found themselves deposed by a grassroots insurgency of the sort unknown in the party since 1912.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brennan (1995) p, 59&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Goldwater's landslide defeat opened the way to a liberal Democrat resurgence, but did little to help the liberal wing of the GOP. The failures of the [[Great Society]], especially a wave of major urban [[riot]]s and a surge in [[violent crime]], led to major gains in 1966, and to Nixon's election in the chaotic 1968 election. The Democrats became deeply divided on the Vietnam war (which did not divide the GOP), and on issues of race, when Alabamian [[George C. Wallace]] set up a third party that carried much of the deep South.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Goldwater faded to a lesser role after 1964, a new conservative hero emerged: in the largest and most trendy state film star [[Ronald Reagan]] was elected governor of California in 1966 and reelected in 1970. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the rise of conservatism, the national Republican Party became more ideologically homogeneous. This change occurred as conservative politicians and voters joined the party and their liberal counterparts abandoned the GOP. Events in New York State during the 1960s and 1970s facilitated this transformation. Here, ideological conservatives formed a third party for the express purpose of changing a state GOP that both symbolized and contributed to the national GOP's liberal viewpoint. The [[Conservative Party, New York|Conservative Party]] relied on the state's unique election law to crash the New York GOP, either by forcing its way in or by imposing a lethal electoral price.  The GOP-Conservative Party relationship began in 1962 at sword's point but achieved a high degree of harmony in 1980. Initially, New York Republicans, led by Governor [[Nelson Rockefeller]], successfully marginalized the new party. As the conservative movement matured, however, the balance of power began to shift. When Nixon was elected president in 1968, the Conservative Party gained an external ally who proved invaluable. The third party achieved partial acceptance in 1970 with the election of [[James Buckley]] to the Senate. For much of the ensuing decade, however, Conservatives struggled with success suffering a series of damaging setbacks. Only in the late 1970s, did the party recover when it embraced a more modest agenda. Finally, the 1980 election settled the overall contours of the relationship between the two parties. Conservatives formed their party to force the state GOP to the right, to drive liberal Republicans from office, and allow ideologically conservative national Republicans to succeed in the state. By 1980, it had achieved these goals changing the nature of politics in the state. This resolution affected politics beyond the state by diminishing the importance of ideological liberals in the national GOP, thus freeing a more ideologically consistent national Republican Party to promote the rise of conservatism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Timothy J. Sullivan, &amp;quot;Crashing the Party: The New York State Conservative and Republican Parties, 1962-1980.&amp;quot;  PhD dissertation U. of Maryland, College Park 2003. 458 pp.  DAI 2004 64(11): 4181-A. DA3112508&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Sixth Party System===&lt;br /&gt;
====Realignment: Republican inroads in the Solid South====&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[The South#Politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the century after Reconstruction ended in 1877, the white South identified with the [[Democrat Party]]. The Democrats' lock on power was so strong, the region was called the &amp;quot;Solid South.&amp;quot; The Republicans controlled certain parts of the Appalachian and Ozark mountains (where slavery was never strong during the Civil War due to the lack of large plots of fertile soil), but they sometimes did compete for statewide office in the border states. Before 1964, the southern Democrats saw their party as the defender of the southern way of life, which included a respect for states' rights and an appreciation for traditional southern values. They repeatedly warned against the aggressive designs of Northern liberals and Republicans, as well as the civil rights activists they denounced as &amp;quot;outside agitators.&amp;quot; Thus there was a serious barrier to becoming a Republican.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, since 1964, the Democrat lock on the South has been broken. The long-term cause was that the region was becoming more like the rest of the nation and could not long stand apart in terms of racial segregation. Modernization that brought factories, businesses, and cities, and millions of migrants from the North; far more people graduated from high school and college. Meanwhile, the cotton and tobacco basis of the traditional South faded away, as former farmers moved to town or commuted to factory jobs. While liberal academics allege that the shift of the South to the Republican Party began in the 1960s, the evidence that it really began in the 1920s and the 1950s is undeniable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Trande, Sean (April 30, 2013). [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/30/southern_whites_shift_to_the_gop_predates_the_60s_118172.html Southern Whites' Shift to the GOP Predates the '60s]. ''Real Clear Politics''. Retrieved September 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Partycivilrights.jpeg|right|200px|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
The immediate cause of the political transition involved civil rights. The [[civil rights movement]] caused enormous controversy among southern Democrats with many attacking it as a violation of states' rights. When segregation was outlawed by a Republican appointed Supreme Court Chief Justice and by the [[bi-partisan]] Civil Rights acts of 1964 and 1965, a die-hard element resisted integration, led by Democrat governors [[Orval Faubus]] of Arkansas, [[Lester Maddox]] of Georgia, and, especially [[George Wallace]] of Alabama. These governors appealed to a less-educated, blue-collar electorate that on economic grounds was dependent on the Democrat Party, but opposed segregation. After the passage of the Civil Rights Act, most Southerners accepted the integration of most institutions, except public schools. With the old barrier to becoming a Republican removed, traditional Southerners joined the new middle class and the Northern transplants in moving toward the Republican party. Integration thus liberated Southern politics, just as [[Martin Luther King]] had promised. Meanwhile, the newly enfranchized black voters were bought off with Johnson's [[War on Poverty]] and supported Democrat candidates at the 85-90% level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The South's transition to a Republican stronghold took decades. First the states started voting Republican in presidential elections—the Democrats countered that with a Southern Strategy that could carry some states in the region, such as [[Jimmy Carter]] in 1976 and 1980, and [[Bill Clinton]] in 1992 and 1996; the strategy did not work with [[Al Gore]] in 2000, or [[John Edwards]] in 2004. Barack Obama held Florida, North Carolina and Virginia and a sweep of House and Senate seats.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the 1970s some states elected Republican senators. Republicans made some inroads into legislatures and governorships and gerrymandering protected the African American and Hispanic vote (as required by the Civil Rights laws), but split up the remaining white Democrats so that Republicans mostly would win. In 2006 the Supreme Court endorsed nearly all of the redistricting engineered by [[Tom DeLay]] that swung the Texas Congressional delegation to the GOP in 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to its white middle-class base, Republicans attracted strong majorities from the evangelical Christian vote, which had been nonpolitical before 1980. The national Democrat Party's support for liberal social stances such as [[abortion]] drove many former Democrats into a Republican party that was embracing the conservative views on these issues. Conversely, liberal Republicans in the northeast began to join the Democrat Party. In 1969 in ''The Emerging Republican Majority'', [[Kevin Phillips]], argued that support from Southern whites and growth in the [[Sun Belt]], among other factors, was driving an enduring Republican electoral [[realigning election|realignment]]. Today, the South is again solid, but the reliable support is for Republican presidential candidates. Exit polls in 2004 showed that Bush led Kerry by 70-30% among whites, who comprised 71% of the Southern voters. Kerry had a 90-9% lead among the 18% of the voters who were black. One-third of the Southerners said they were white evangelicals; they voted for Bush by 80-20%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [https://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.3.html exit polls]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the shift towards the Republican Party on the presidential level, the South remained solidly Democratic on the state level through the 1980s, 1990s, and even into the 2000s in several states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Trande, Sean (September 9, 2010). [http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/09/09/misunderstanding_the_southern_realignment_107084.html Misunderstanding the Southern Realignment]. ''Real Clear Politics''. Retrieved September 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Republican Party only became dominant in the state-level in the 2010 elections, when it captured several state legislatures, among many other victories.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Hamby&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Hamby, Peter (December 9, 2014). [https://www.cnn.com/2014/12/03/politics/southern-democrats/ The plight of the Southern Democrat]. ''CNN''. Retrieved September 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the 2014 elections, the GOP controlled every state legislature in the South with the sole exception of the Kentucky State House, in which the Democrats maintained a slim majority.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Hamby&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Additionally by 2015, the GOP was dominant in every level of government across the South.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Hamby&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohn, Nate (December 4, 2014). [https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/05/upshot/demise-of-the-southern-democrat-is-now-nearly-compete.html?_r=0 Demise of the Southern Democrat Is Now Nearly Complete]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved September 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2016, the GOP took the Kentucky State House in a landslide, making every legislature in the South GOP-controlled.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Loftus, Tom (November 9, 2016). [http://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/elections/kentucky/2016/11/08/control-kentucky-house-up-grabs/93344114/ GOP takes Ky House in historic shift]. ''Courier-Journal''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brammer, Jack &amp;amp; Blackford, Linda (November 8, 2016). [https://www.kentucky.com/news/politics-government/article113464563.html Republicans take the Kentucky House after 95 years of Democratic control]. ''Lexington Herald-Leader''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Reagan Era====&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article: [[Reagan Era]]''&lt;br /&gt;
In 1980, [[Ronald Reagan]] won the Republican nomination and easily beat Carter and a breakaway Republican with his strong communication skills and message of economic freedom and strength against the [[Soviet Union]]. Reagan produced a major realignment with his 1980 and 1984 landslides. In 1980 the Reagan coalition was possible because of Democrat losses in most social-economic groups. In 1984 Reagan won nearly 60% of the popular vote and carried every state except his Democrat opponent Walter Mondale's home state of [[Minnesota]] and the District of Columbia, creating a record 525 electoral vote total (of 538 possible). Even in Minnesota, Mondale won by a mere 3,761 votes,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/state.php?year=1984&amp;amp;fips=27&amp;amp;f=1&amp;amp;off=0&amp;amp;elect=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; meaning Reagan came within fewer than 3,800 votes of winning in all fifty states.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Reagan and Buckley.jpg|left|thumb|220px|Reagan opened his presidency proclaiming &amp;quot;Government is the problem&amp;quot;.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Running on a &amp;quot;Peace Through Strength&amp;quot; platform to combat the Communist threat and massive tax cuts to revitalize the economy, Reagan's strong but genial persona proved too much for the ineffective and sour Carter in 1980. Reagan's election also gave Republicans control of the Senate for the first time in decades. Dubbed the &amp;quot;Reagan Revolution&amp;quot; he fundamentally altered several long standing debates in Washington, namely dealing with the Soviet threat and reviving the economy. His election saw the conservative wing of the party gain control. While reviled by liberal opponents in his day, his proponents contend his programs provided unprecedented economic growth, and spurred the collapse of the former Soviet Union. Currently regarded as one of the most popular and successful presidents in the modern era (1960–present), he inspired Conservatives to greater electoral victories by being re-elected in a landslide against Walter Mondale in 1984 but oversaw the loss of the Senate in 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The so-called &amp;quot;Reagan Democrats&amp;quot; were Democrats before the Reagan years, and afterward, but who voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984 (and for George H.W. Bush in 1988), producing their landslide victories. They were primarily Southern Democrats and ethnic Catholics in the Northeast and were frustrated by their seeing abandonment on cultural issues by the Democrat Party's national leaders. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reagan's Vice-President, [[George H.W. Bush]], a [[World War II]] war hero, was elected in 1988 but was defeated in 1992 as domestic issues took prominence after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 and end of the [[Cold War]].  Democrat challenger [[Bill Clinton]] strategically repositioned the Democrats to the right. [[Ross Perot]]'s candidacy was instrumental in Clinton's victory as he took Republican votes with his criticism of deficits and the free trade movement.  Perot won 19% of the popular vote, and Clinton, still a largely unknown quantity in American politics with 41% of! the popular vote took office. Despite his loss, Bush left office in 1993 with a 56 percent job approval rating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The Gingrich revolution====&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main articles: [[Republican Revolution (1994)]] and [[Contract with America]]''&lt;br /&gt;
House Republican Minority Whip [[Newt Gingrich]]-led the [[Republican Revolution (1994)|&amp;quot;Republican Revolution&amp;quot; of 1994]] and its famous ''[[Contract with America]]''. It was the first time since the 1952 elections that the Republicans secured control of both houses of Congress, which, with the brief exception of the Senate during 2001-2002, lasted until the 2006 mid-term elections.  Democrats had controlled both houses of Congress for the forty years preceding 1994, with the exception of the 1981-1987 Congresses (in which Republicans controlled the Senate). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1994 mid-term election, Republican congressional candidates ran on a platform of promising floor votes to force members of Congress to go on record on a series of popular reforms—something the Democrats had stifled for decades. These measures and others formed the Contract with America, which represented the first effort to have a party platform in a mid-term election. Seven of the ten Contract items actually became Law.  The budget reforms, coupled with reduced defense spending after the Cold War, and the earlier Reagan Tax Cuts for Business Research and Development in the 1980s, led to a high tech consumer boom, rising incomes for all groups, and unprecedented, sustained economic growth in the late 1990s. Democratic President Bill Clinton opposed some of the social agenda initiatives but he co-opted the proposals for welfare reform and a balanced federal budget. The result was a major change in the welfare system, which conservatives hailed and liberals bemoaned. One Contract item, which required Democrats in a two-thirds majority to pass a Constitutional amendment to impose term limits on members of Congress, failed. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995, a budget battle with [[President Clinton]] led to the brief shutdown of the federal government, an event which contributed to Clinton's victory in the 1996 election. That year the Republicans nominated [[Bob Dole]], who was unable to transfer his success in Senate leadership to a viable presidential campaign. [[Ross Perot]] ran again (this time on [[Reform Party]] ticket), once again draining away a large percentage of Dole's support and ensuring Clinton another term after the majority of Americans voters voted against him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====War on Terror====&lt;br /&gt;
:Main article: [[War on Terror]]''&lt;br /&gt;
With the election of George W. Bush (son of former president George H. W. Bush) in an extremely close 2000 election, the Republican party controlled both the presidency and both houses of Congress for the first time since 1952. However, after [[Vermont]] Senator Jim Jeffords left the Republican Party to become an independent aligned with the Democrats in June 2001, Republicans lost control of the Senate by a single seat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the September 11, 2001, Islamic terrorist attacks on the United States, however, Bush pursued a &amp;quot;War on Terrorism&amp;quot; that included the liberation of Afghanistan from the radical Islamic Taliban regime and the [[Patriot act|USA PATRIOT act]]. By early 2002, the Taliban was removed from power in Afghanistan. On March 20, 2003, U.S. and allied nations initiated &amp;quot;Operation Iraqi Freedom&amp;quot; to liberate the Iraqi people from the brutal regime of [[Saddam Hussein]]. By May 1, 2003, the regime of Saddam was declared officially over. Once US and allied military forces entered Iraq, they discovered that various international terrorists had been given sanctuary and ran their terrorist operations from Iraq. Notable terrorists found included Muhammad Zaidan aka Abu Abbas and Sabri Khalil al-Banna aka Abu Nidal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Party fared well in the 2002 midterm elections, solidifying its hold on the House and regaining control of the Senate, in the run-up to the liberation of Iraq. This marked just the third time since the Civil War that the party in control of the White House gained seats in both houses of Congress in a midterm election (others were 1902 and 1934). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bush was renominated without opposition for the [[United States presidential election, 2004]] and titled his political platform &amp;quot;A Safer World and a More Hopeful America&amp;quot;. It expressed Bush's commitment to winning the War on Terror, ushering in an Ownership Era, and building an innovative economy to compete in the world. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 2, 2004, Bush was re-elected, while Republicans gained seats in both houses of Congress, leaving Democrats in disarray. Bush carried 31 of 50 states for 286 Electoral College votes. In that election, he also received more popular votes than any previous presidential candidate, 62.0 million votes. Democrat challenger, Senator [[John Kerry]], won 251 Electoral votes and 48% of the popular vote to Bush's 51%. It was the first time anyone won a popular majority since 1988. 2004 marked the seventh consecutive election in which the Democrat nominee failed to reach that threshold.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The wilderness years 2009–2010====&lt;br /&gt;
After smashing defeats in 2006 and 2008, the GOP lost control of Congress, the White House, and many states. They confronted the president, who still retained some popularity, but were able to chip away at support for his domestic policies, as the [[recession of 2008]] dragged on.  In June 2009, public opinion was favorable toward Obama personally but increasingly dubious about his plans to overhaul health care, rescue the auto industry and close the prison at Guantánamo Bay. But with a positive job approval rating of 51%, Obama has the backing of most Democrats, even as Republicans turn negative, with only 23% supporting him.  Support for Obama's foreign policies and terrorism policies remains high at 57-59%.  Meanwhile, the GOP weaknesses were glaring: the June poll found that the Republican Party is viewed favorably by only 28% of Americans, the lowest rating ever in a New York Times/CBS News poll. In contrast, 57% said that they had a favorable view of the Democrat Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jeff Zeleny and Dalia Sussman, &amp;quot;Obama Poll Sees Doubt on Budget and Health Care [https://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/us/politics/18poll.html?th&amp;amp;emc=th ''New York Times'' June 17, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, it should be noted that this poll was conducted by the [[mainstream media]] and thus is a clear example of [[liberal bias]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Rise of the Tea Party movement====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:TeaPartyByFreedomFan.JPG|thumb|200px|right|Tea Party movement March on DC, 2009.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{main|Tea Party Movement}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Tea Party movement, which began around 2009 and supports small government, fiscal conservatism, American independence, and border security, made huge gains in the 2010 election, defeating establishment Republicans and RINOs. They continued to make gains in later elections, including the 2014 elections in [[Texas]] and the 2015 [[Kentucky]] elections, and some commentators, including liberals&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | last1=Chait | first1=Jonathan | title=Donald Trump Hasn’t Killed the Tea Party. He Is the Tea Party | url=http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/05/donald-trump-is-the-tea-party.html | date=May 19, 2016 | publisher=''New York'' | accessdate=December 7, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and conservatives,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | last1=Martin | first1=Jenny Beth | title=How the Tea Party Helped Trump Win the Election | url=https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/11/12/how-tea-party-helped-trump-win-election.html | date=November 12, 2016 | publisher=[[Fox News]] | accessdate=December 7, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | last1=Martin | first1=Jenny Beth | title=The Tea Party Movement Is Alive and Well—And We Saw Trump Coming | url=https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/the-tea-party-movement-is-alive-and-well-and-we-saw-trump-coming-214469 | date=November 19, 2016 | publisher=[[Politico|Politico Magazine]] | accessdate=December 7, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web | last1=Hayward | first1=John | title=Sarah Palin: Trump Movement Began with the GOP Establishment’s ‘Shocking Betrayals’ of Tea Party Voters | url=https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/11/25/sarah-palin-trump-movement-began-with-the-gop-establishments-shocking-betrayals-of-tea-party-voters/ | date=November 25, 2016 | publisher=[[Breitbart News]] | accessdate=December 7, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; even believe it was responsible for Donald Trump's 2016 victory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite little action on the federal level, GOP-controlled governments at the state level did deliver to voters, such as through tax reductions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Persons, Sally (May 31, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/31/republican-governors-elected-in-2010-delivering-to/ Republican governors elected in 2010 delivering to their states what Congress hasn’t]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved May 31, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Trump Era====&lt;br /&gt;
:''For further information, see [[2016 U.S. presidential election#General election results]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Republican businessman [[Donald Trump]] won the [[United States presidential election, 2016|2016 presidential election]] in a major and historic upset that took the [[establishment]], pollsters and analysts completely by surprise, even winning states such as [[Wisconsin]], [[Michigan]], and [[Pennsylvania]], which Republicans had not won for years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/08/first-polls-close-in-2016-race-trump-projected-to-win-ind-ky-clinton-wins-vt.html Trump wins presidency, defeats Clinton in historic election upset]. ''Fox News''. November 8, 2016. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blake, Aaron (November 9, 2016). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/08/donald-trumps-path-to-victory-is-suddenly-looking-much-much-wider/ Donald Trump just blew up the electoral map]. ''The Washington Post''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Republican Party kept control of the House and Senate, outperforming expectations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bresnahan, John (November 9, 2016). [https://www.politico.eu/article/republicans-on-cusp-of-keeping-the-senate/ Republicans hold the Senate in a stunner]. ''Politico''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hughes, Siobhan (November 9, 2016). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/republicans-are-confident-about-retaining-control-of-the-house-1478634160 Democrats Gain Seats in House, But GOP Retains Majority]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Donald Trump official presidential photo.jpg|left|thumb|200px|President Donald Trump]]&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the Republican Party performed well—much better than expected—in state races, winning trifectas in [[Kentucky]], [[Iowa]], [[Missouri]], and [[New Hampshire]], and Democrats only had six trifectas and total control in five states, a record low.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greenblatt, Alan (November 9, 2016). [http://www.governing.com/topics/elections/gov-republicans-add-dominance-state-legislatures.html Republicans Add to Their Dominance of State Legislatures]. ''Governing''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Siegel, Josh (November 9, 2016). [http://dailysignal.com/2016/11/09/republicans-maintain-strong-control-of-state-capitols-what-that-means/ Republicans Maintain Strong Control of State Capitols. Here’s What That Means.] ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The GOP won 25 trifectas, the largest since 1952.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ReshapeLaws&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lieb, David A. (December 29, 2016). [https://www.pressreader.com/usa/chicago-tribune/20161229/281822873464433 GOP-Controlled States Aim to Reshape Laws]. ''Chicago Tribune'' (from the Associated Press). Retrieved December 30, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the election, the GOP controlled the highest amount of governorships since 1922,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lieb, David A. (November 9, 2016). [https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2016-11-09/republicans-expand-control-of-governorships-legislatures Republicans governorships rise to highest mark since 1922]. ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and it controlled the most state legislative chambers in history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bosman, Julie &amp;amp; Davey, Monica (November 11, 2016). [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/us/republicans-expand-control-in-a-deeply-divided-nation.html Republicans Expand Control in a Deeply Divided Nation]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved November 14, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After [[West Virginia]] Governor [[Jim Justice]] left the Democratic Party and joined the GOP, the GOP had 34 Republican governors, the most since 1922.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leahy, Michael Patrick (August 7, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/07/34-states-have-republican-governors-most-since-1922/ 34 States Have Republican Governors, Most Since 1922]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the GOP increased its vote share across the entire nation, Trump made the largest gains in the rural [[Midwest]] and [[Rust Belt]], traditionally a Democrat blue collar stronghold.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/elections/how-trump-pushed-the-election-map-to-the-right.html How Trump Reshaped the Election Map]. ''The New York Times''. November 9, 2016. Retrieved November 12, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the large gains, the GOP had a massive opportunity to pass [[Conservative|common sense conservative]] legislation and repeal leftist social and economic quagmires.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ReshapeLaws&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; At the beginning of 2017, Congressional Republicans were also more united during Trump's presidency than in any other time in recent U.S. political history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stucky, Phillip (April 2, 2017). [https://dailycaller.com/2017/04/02/trump-smashes-records-with-party-unity/ Trump Smashes Records With Party Unity]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved April 2, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, despite these opportunities, the 115th U.S. Congress saw many missed opportunities to advance conservative policies and priorities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sherfinski, David; Dinan, Stephen (January 3, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/3/republicans-relinquish-congress-whimper-more-misse/ Republicans relinquish Congress with whimper: 'More missed opportunities than anything']. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 13, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Wolverton, Joe (January 13, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/commentary/item/31175-gop-controlled-house-adds-nearly-8-trillion-to-national-debt GOP-controlled House Added Nearly $8 Trillion to National Debt]. ''The New American''. Retrieved January 13, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2017, the RNC raised a record $10.8 million,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kew, Ben (June 21, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/21/rnc-raises-more-dems/ Dems Fundraising Lowest Since May 2003; RNC Raises Record $10.8 Million]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while the DNC raised $4.29 million, the lowest raised in the month since 2003.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Persons, Sally (June 21, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jun/21/dnc-hits-another-fundraising-low/ DNC hits another fundraising low]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bowden, John (June 21, 2017). [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/338864-democrats-only-raised-43-million-in-may-worst-fundraising-since-2003 Democrats raised just $4.3M in May]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved June 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The RNC broke another record in June 2017, raising $13.4 million,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kew, Ben (July 20, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/20/rnc-breaks-another-fundraising-record-raises-record-13-4-million-in-june/ RNC Breaks Another Fundraising Record, Raises Record $13.4 Million in June]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 20, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Siegel, Josh (July 20, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/rnc-announces-it-raised-135-million-in-june-a-record-for-a-month-in-a-non-presidential-year/article/2629300 RNC announces it raised $13.5 million in June, a record for a month in a non-presidential year]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved July 20, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as well as July.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kew, Ben (August 21, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/21/rnc-breaks-another-fundraising-record-as-democrats-struggle/ RNC Breaks Another Fundraising Record as Democrats Struggle]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2017 overall, the RNC raised over $130 million, a large amount for an off-election year,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Persons, Sally (December 27, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/dec/27/rnc-set-raise-over-100-million-2017-after-leadersh/ RNC set to raise $130M in 2017 after leadership makes fundraising a top priority]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved December 27, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Moran, Sean (December 28, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/12/28/rnc-set-raise-record-130-million-2017/ RNC Set to Raise Record $130 Million in 2017]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 28, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Samuels, Brett (January 31, 2018). [https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/371650-rnc-announces-record-off-year-fundraising-haul-in-2017 RNC announces record off-year fundraising haul for 2017]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved January 31, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Moran, Sean (February 1, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/01/rnc-raises-record-off-year-132-5-million-2017/ RNC Raises Record Off-Year $132.5 Million in 2017]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved February 1, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the National Republican Congressional Committee also raised a record $85 million in 2017.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Moran, Sean (January 15, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/15/nrcc-raised-record-85-million-ahead-contentious-2018-midterm-elections/ NRCC Raised a Record $85 Million Ahead of Contentious 2018 Midterm Elections]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 15, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Republican Party and the Trump campaign continued raising large sums of money.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Singman, Brooke; Dorman, Sam (January 3, 2020). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-campaign-gop-raised-nearly-a-half-billion-dollars-in-2019 Trump campaign, GOP raised nearly a half-billion dollars in 2019]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 3, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A September 2018 Gallup poll found that the GOP's favorability rating reached the highest level since 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Norman, Jim (September 24, 2018). [https://news.gallup.com/poll/242906/republican-party-favorability-highest-seven-years.aspx Republican Party Favorability Highest in Seven Years]. ''Gallup''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Boyle, Matthew (September 24, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/24/gallup-with-donald-trump-at-helm-gop-rises-to-highest-approval-rating-in-nearly-a-decade/ Gallup: With Donald Trump at Helm, GOP Rises to Highest Approval Rating in Nearly a Decade]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Adelmann, Bob (September 25, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/30167-gop-s-favorability-rating-highest-in-seven-years GOP’s Favorability Rating Highest in Seven Years]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 25, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Keller, Megan (September 24, 2018). [https://thehill.com/homenews/house/408123-republican-partys-favorability-rating-comparable-with-democrats-gallup GOP's favorability hits highest mark in seven years: Gallup]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lim, Naomi (September 24, 2018). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/gops-favorability-rating-hits-highest-point-since-2011 GOP's favorability rating hits highest point since 2011]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fordham, Evie (September 24, 2018). [https://dailycaller.com/2018/09/24/republican-party-favorability-gallup/ Poll: Republican Party Enjoys Highest Favorability Rating in Seven Years]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved September 24, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Kentucky]], voters overwhelmingly rejected the Democrats' racist agenda, electing the state's first black [[Attorney General]] and first Republican in 70 years, [[Daniel Cameron]]. Four years earlier, Kentucky voters elected conservative Republican Jenean Hampton as the state's first black statewide elected official, and the Republican governor they elected, [[Matt Bevin]], had adopted four children from Ethiopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contemporary Party ==&lt;br /&gt;
The contemporary Republican Party represents a wide array of interests such as the conservative evangelicals, economic libertarians, and anti-globalists. The party has had some internal conflict over attitudes about how governments should run and how large they should be, what the party stands for, and what the party's attitude towards [[neo-conservatism]] should be especially in regard to foreign policy. The party is also divided over immigration issues with some members (such as George W. Bush) favoring workers visas and permits and some other members favoring strict control of immigration and strong action against illegal immigration.  Unlike the Democrat Party, the Republican Party routinely allows dissenting factions such as the [[Log Cabin Republicans]] to speak at National Conventions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the past, the Republican voter coalitions have generally comprised businessmen, military veterans and evangelical Protestants. Some groups have realigned: blacks went from the GOP to the Democrats beginning in the 1930s, while some white Southerners became Republicans in the 1980s. Catholics switched from 80% Democratic in 1960 to 50-50 in recent years, primarily due to the embrace of [[abortion]] by the Democrats (though the Hispanic community still votes predominantly Democrat due to its support for illegal immigration and sanctuary cities).  Extremely wealthy businessmen (such as [[Bill Gates]] and [[Warren Buffett]]) have switched to the Democrat party, though small businessmen generally remain in the Republican party.  In recent years youth (influenced by [[Hollywood values]]) and better educated professionals (influenced by [[professor values]]) have moved to the Democrats, while blue collar workers have become more Republican, due mainly to Democrats support for globalist ideals at the expense of manufacturing job losses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Republican Presidents==&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Abraham Lincoln]] (1861–1865)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Ulysses S. Grant]] (1869–1877)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Rutherford B. Hayes]] (1877–1881)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[James Garfield]] (1881)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Chester A. Arthur]] (1881–1885)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Benjamin Harrison]] (1889–1893)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[William McKinley]] (1897–1901)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Theodore Roosevelt]] (1901–1909)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[William Howard Taft]] (1909–1913)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Warren G. Harding]] (1921–1923)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Calvin Coolidge]] (1923–1929)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Herbert Hoover]] (1929–1933)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Dwight Eisenhower]] (1953–1961)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Richard Nixon]] (1969–1974)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Gerald Ford]] (1974–1977)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Ronald Reagan]] (1981–1989)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[George H. W. Bush]] (1989–1993)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[George W. Bush]] (2001–2009)&lt;br /&gt;
# [[Donald Trump]] (2017–)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notable Republicans (Non-presidential)==&lt;br /&gt;
An incomplete list of notable Republican leaders and politicians who were not elected president:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Frederick Douglass]] (1818–1895): Abolitionist and suffragist from [[Maryland]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[James G. Blaine]] (1830–1893): Senator from [[Maine]], presidential nominee&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph Gurney Cannon]] (1836–1926): [[Speaker of the United States House of Representatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Curtis]] (1860–1936): United States [[Vice President]], a Native American&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles G. Dawes]] (1865–1951): United States Vice President, [[Nobel Peace Prize]] winner&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Tom Dewey]] (1902–1971): Governor of [[New York]]; presidential nominee in 1944 and 1948&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Everett Dirksen]] (1896–1969): Senate minority leader, instrumental in passing the [[Civil Rights Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John C. Frémont]] (1813–1890): First Republican candidate for president&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Rudy Giuliani]]: Mayor of [[New York City]] (1994-2001)&lt;br /&gt;
*Mark Hanna (1837–1904): Senator from [[Ohio]], manager of 1896 campaign&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jesse Helms]] (1921–2008): Senator from [[North Carolina]]&lt;br /&gt;
*George Frisbie Hoar (1826–1904): Senator from [[Massachusetts]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Evans Hughes]]: Governor of New York; presidential nominee in 1916, United States Secretary of State, [[Chief Justice of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Martin Luther King, Jr.]] (1929–1968): [[Civil rights]] leader&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Jackie Robinson]] (1919-1972): first [[African American]] major league baseball player&lt;br /&gt;
*William Fife Knowland (1908–1974), Senator from [[California]], Senate Majority Leader from 1953-1955, Senate Minority Leader from 1955-1959 &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Cabot Lodge]] (1850–1924): Senator from [[Massachusetts]], foreign policy spokesman&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Joseph McCarthy]] (1908–1957): Senator from [[Wisconsin]] and noted anti-communist&lt;br /&gt;
*Thomas Brackett Reed (1839–1902): Speaker of the United States House of Representatives&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nelson Rockefeller]] (1908–1979): Vice President, Governor of New York, considered representative of the liberal wing of the party&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Thaddeus Stevens]] (1792–1868): Senator from [[Pennsylvania]], leader of Radicals in Civil War and Reconstruction&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Sumner]] (1811–1874): Senator from Massachusetts, leader of Radicals in Civil War and Reconstruction&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Henry Stimson]]: Secretary of War for Taft and FDR, Secretary of State for Hoover &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Robert Taft]] (1889–1953): Senator from Ohio and presidential hopeful, leader of conservatives&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Strom Thurmond]] (1902–2003): the oldest serving senator in history (from [[South Carolina]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Arthur H. Vandenberg (1884–1951): Senator from Michigan, leader of internationalism in 1940s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Scott Walker]]: Governor of [[Wisconsin]], presidential candidate in 2016&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Earl Warren]] (1891–1974): Vice presidential nominee, [[Governor of California]], and [[Chief Justice of the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barry Goldwater]] (1909–1998): Senator from [[Arizona]], presidential nominee in 1964&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Antonin Scalia]] (1936–2016): Associate Justice of the Supreme Court (1986–2016)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Clarence Thomas]]: Associate Justice of the Supreme Court (1991–present)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[John McCain]]: Senator from [[Arizona]], presidential nominee in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sarah Palin]]: Governor of [[Alaska]], vice-presidential nominee in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]: Governor of [[California]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mitt Romney]]: Governor of [[Massachusetts]], presidential nominee in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mike Pence]]: Vice President (2017–present), Governor of [[Indiana]] (2013–2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of political parties in the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[RINO]] – '''R'''epublicans '''i'''n '''N'''ame '''O'''nly&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Republicans|Articles about '''Republicans''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical===&lt;br /&gt;
*''American National Biography'' (20 volumes, 1999) covers all politicians no longer alive; online at many academic libraries.&lt;br /&gt;
* Abramson, Paul R.  et al. ''Change and Continuity in the 2004 and 2006 Elections'' (2007) [https://www.amazon.com/Change-Continuity-2004-2006-Elections/dp/0872894150/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1221785751&amp;amp;sr=8-10 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Batchelor, John Calvin.  ''&amp;quot;Ain't You Glad You Joined the Republicans?&amp;quot; A Short History of the GOP.'' 1996. 399 pp.  well-written popular history, well illustrated&lt;br /&gt;
* Chace, James. ''1912: Wilson, Roosevelt, Taft, and Debs - The Election That Changed the Country.'' (2004). 323 pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* ''Congressional Quarterly's Guide to U.S. Elections'' (4th ed 2003) 1600pp, vast compilation of data, esp., since 1945&lt;br /&gt;
* Foner, Eric. ''Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War (1970), influential history of ideas and ideology; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=90104191 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*Gienapp, William E. ''The Origins of the Republican Party, 1852-1856'' (1987), quantitative voting studies, by state&lt;br /&gt;
* Goldberg, Robert Alan. ''Barry Goldwater'' (1995), &lt;br /&gt;
*Gould, Lewis. ''Grand Old Party: A History of the Republicans'' (2003), the best scholarly overview.&lt;br /&gt;
* Hodgson, Godfrey. ''The World Turned Right Side Up: A History of the Conservative Ascendancy in America'' (1996). by British journalist&lt;br /&gt;
*Jensen, Richard. ''Grass Roots Politics: Parties, Issues, and Voters, 1854-1983'' (1983) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=15326916 online edition] &lt;br /&gt;
*Jensen, Richard. ''The Winning of the Midwest: Social and Political Conflict, 1888-1896'' (1971)&lt;br /&gt;
*Kleppner, Paul, et al. ''The Evolution of American Electoral Systems'' (1983), applies party systems model&lt;br /&gt;
*Kleppner, Paul. ''The Third Electoral System 1853-1892: Parties, Voters, and Political Cultures'' (1979), analysis of voting behavior, with emphasis on region, ethnicity, religion and class. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24451028 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*Marcus, Robert. ''Grand Old Party: Political Structure in the Gilded Age, 1880-1896'' 1971.&lt;br /&gt;
*Morgan, H. Wayne. ''From Hayes to McKinley; National Party Politics, 1877-1896'' (1969) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=94446383 online edition], good survey of era&lt;br /&gt;
*Mayer, George H. ''The Republican Party, 1854-1966.'' 2nd ed. (1967), narrative.&lt;br /&gt;
*Parmet, Herbert S. ''Eisenhower and the American Crusades'' (1972) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=14967951 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Mr. Republican: A Biography of Robert A. Taft'' (1972) &lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus'' (2002) well written, broad account of 1964&lt;br /&gt;
*Perlstein, Rick. ''Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America'' (2008), 896pp; covers 1965 to 1972 &lt;br /&gt;
* Reinhard, David W. ''The Republican Right since 1945'' (1983) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=91954887 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*Rutland, Robert Allen. ''The Republicans: From Lincoln to Bush'' (1996) popular narrative&lt;br /&gt;
*Shafer, Byron E. and Anthony J. Badger, eds. ''Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775-2000'' (2001), long essays by specialists on each time period: [https://www.amazon.com/Contesting-Democracy-Substance-Structure-Political/dp/0700611398/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1221785707&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
**includes: &amp;quot;'To One or Another of These Parties Every Man Belongs;&amp;quot;: 1820–1865 by Joel H. Silbey; &amp;quot;Change and Continuity in the Party Period: 1835–1885&amp;quot; by Michael F. Holt; &amp;quot;The Transformation of American Politics: 1865–1910&amp;quot; by Peter H. Argersinger; &amp;quot;Democracy, Republicanism, and Efficiency: 1885–1930&amp;quot; by Richard Jensen; &amp;quot;The Limits of Federal Power and Social Policy: 1910–1955&amp;quot; by Anthony J. Badger; &amp;quot;The Rise of Rights and Rights Consciousness: 1930–1980&amp;quot; by James T. Patterson; and &amp;quot;Economic Growth, Issue Evolution, and Divided Government: 1955–2000&amp;quot; by Byron E. Shafer&lt;br /&gt;
*Schlesinger, Arthur Meier, Jr. ed. ''History of American Presidential Elections, 1789-2000'' (various multivolume editions, latest is 2001). For each election includes good scholarly history and selection of primary document. Essays on the most important election are reprinted in Schlesinger, ''The Coming to Power: Critical presidential elections in American history'' (1972)&lt;br /&gt;
* Smith, Richard Norton. An Uncommon Man: The Triumph of Herbert Hoover, (1987) full-length scholarly biography.&lt;br /&gt;
*Summers, Mark Wahlgren. ''Rum, Romanism &amp;amp; Rebellion: The Making of a President, 1884'' (2000) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=104865169 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Sundquist, James L. ''Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States'' (1983) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=29223022 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Thelen, David. ''Robert M. La Follette and the Insurgent Spirit'' 1976. short interpretive biography &lt;br /&gt;
===Since 1980===&lt;br /&gt;
*Barone, Michael, and Grant Ujifusa, ''The Almanac of American Politics 2008: The Senators, the Representatives and the Governors: Their Records and Election Results, Their States and Districts'' (2007) covers all incumbent Congressmen and governors with amazing detail.  New edition published every two years since 1975.&lt;br /&gt;
* Aistrup, Joseph A. ''The Southern Strategy Revisited: Republican Top-Down Advancement in the South'' (1996)&lt;br /&gt;
* Black, Earl and Black, Merle.  ''The Rise of Southern Republicans.'' (2002). 442 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Cannon, Lou. ''President Reagan: The Role of a Lifetime'' (2000), [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=88989671 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Critchlow, Donald T. ''The Conservative Ascendancy: How the GOP Right Made Political History'' (2007), by a leading conservative historian  &lt;br /&gt;
* Edwards, Lee.  ''The Conservative Revolution: The Movement That Remade America.'' (1999). 391 pp.  by a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
*Ehrman, John, ''The Eighties: America in the Age of Reagan'' (2005) by a conservative historian&lt;br /&gt;
* Frank, Thomas. ''What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America'' (2005), a liberal attack  [https://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-Kansas-Conservatives-America/dp/B000FTWB3K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1198072365&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Green, John Robert. ''The Presidency of George Bush.'' (2000). 1989-1993&lt;br /&gt;
* Lamis, Alexander P. ed. ''Southern Politics in the 1990s'' (1999)&lt;br /&gt;
* Layman, Geoffrey. ''The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics.'' (2001). 435pp. &lt;br /&gt;
* Levy, Peter B. ''Encyclopedia of the Reagan-Bush Years'' Greenwood Press, 1996 [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=77341841 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Lublin, David.  ''The Republican South: Democratization and Partisan Change.'' Princeton U. Press, 2004. 272 pp.  [https://www.amazon.com/Republican-South-Democratization-Partisan-Change/dp/0691130477/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1198072384&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush vs. Gore.'' (2005), standard scholarly synthesis.&lt;br /&gt;
* Pemberton, William E. ''Exit with Honor: The Life and Presidency of Ronald Reagan'' (1998) favorable biography by historian; [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=49534236 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Reeves, Richard. ''President Reagan: The Triumph of Imagination'' (2005) detailed analysis by conservative historian&lt;br /&gt;
* Rymph, Catherine.  ''Republican Women: Feminism and Conservatism from Suffrage through the Rise of the New Right.'' U. of North Carolina Press, 2006. 338 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Sabato, Larry J. ed. ''The Sixth Year Itch: The Rise and Fall of the George W. Bush Presidency'' (2007), in-depth essays by scholars &lt;br /&gt;
*Sabato, Larry J. ''Divided States of America: The Slash and Burn Politics of the 2004 Presidential Election'' (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
* Sabato, Larry J. and Bruce Larson. ''The Party's Just Begun: Shaping Political Parties for America's Future'' (2001).&lt;br /&gt;
* Schaller, Michael and Rising, George.  ''The Republican Ascendancy: American Politics, 1968-2001.'' Harlan Davidson, 2002. 210 pp.  Short survey by liberal scholars&lt;br /&gt;
* Steely, Mel.  ''The Gentleman from Georgia: The Biography of Newt Gingrich.'' Mercer U. Press, 2000. 431 pp.   &lt;br /&gt;
* Taylor, Andrew J.  ''Elephant's Edge: The Republicans as a Ruling Party.''  2005. 336 pp. academic study of how GOP turned small advantages into power [https://www.amazon.com/Elephants-Edge-Republicans-Ruling-Party/dp/0275985369/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1198072452&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilentz, Sean. ''The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974-2008'' (2008) by a liberal historian. [https://www.amazon.com/Age-Reagan-History-1974-2008/dp/0060744804/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1221786281&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*Wooldridge, Adrian and John Micklethwait. ''The Right Nation: Conservative Power in America'' sophisticated study by two British journalists (2004). [https://www.amazon.com/Right-Nation-Conservative-Power-America/dp/B000F71124/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1198072420&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Notes====&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gop.com/ Official GOP Site]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf 2008 Republican Platform (pdf download)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://nyyrcrecord.blogspot.com/ New York Young Republican Record]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.house.gov/hensarling/rsc/doc/rsc_action_plan.pdf The RSC’s Action Plan for House Republicans], Republican Study Committee, May 20, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.house.gov/hensarling/rsc/doc/rsc_action_plan_(broad).pdf A Detailed Action Plan For House Republicans: Bold, Simple, and Different than the Democrats], Republican Study Committee, May 20, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/wls/category/republicans/ What Liberals Say - Category: Republicans], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Party|!]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Modernization]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Member of the International Democrat Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Conservatism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Darth Umbris</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=1718220</id>
		<title>Democratic Party</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_Party&amp;diff=1718220"/>
		<updated>2021-01-03T18:09:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Darth Umbris: Grammar correction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{AmericanPoliticalParty&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_name=Democratic Party&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_articletitle = Democratic Party (United States)&lt;br /&gt;
 | party_logo = [[Image:democraticpartyusalogo.png|200px]]&amp;lt;!--[[Image:HammerAndSickle.png|100px]]--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 | Thankssite = [http://www.democrats.org www.democrats.org]&lt;br /&gt;
 | headquarters = 430 South Capitol Street SE&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(next to the [[Murder of Seth Rich|Seth Rich bike rack]])&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;[https://www.swpm.us/crowd-chants-justice-seth-rich-outside-dnc/ CROWD CHANTS ‘JUSTICE FOR SETH RICH!’ OUTSIDE DNC], By Alicia Powe and Chelsea Schilling, ''The Front Line'', July 11, 2017.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Washington, D.C.]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;20003 &lt;br /&gt;
 | chairman = [[Thomas Perez]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | houseleader = [[Nancy Pelosi]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | senateleader = [[Chuck Schumer]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | foundation = 1828&lt;br /&gt;
 | ideology = [[Elitism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Historical revisionism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; [[Socialism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Progressivism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Fascism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Democratic Socialism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Hollywood values]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Communism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Anti-Semitism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Keynes]]ianism&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Racism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[White supremacy]],&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Cultural Marxism]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Hypocrisy]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Historically: &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Segregation]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Jim Crow]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[Slave Power]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | fiscalpolicy = [[Left-wing]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | socialpolicy = Left-wing to [[Far-left]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | international = &lt;br /&gt;
 | colors = Blue (unofficial) formerly Red prior to the collapse of the [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
 | footnotes =&lt;br /&gt;
}} &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;''This article is about the Democratic Party of the United States.  For parties named &amp;quot;Democratic Party&amp;quot; in other countries,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; see [[Democratic party (disambiguation)]].  For the grammatically-correct name of the party, see [[Democrat Party]]''&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOC right}}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Democratic Party'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is the official name of the party.[https://www.democrats.org/about/our-party/party-organization]. Some refer to it as the Democrat party, implying the party is not democratic. The term is said to grate on Democrats' ears.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ('''D''') is one of the two major political [[parties]] in the [[United States of America]]. Slavery, segregation, and controlling minorities was and remains a founding principle of the Democratic party, and which the GOP was founded to oppose.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Since its formation, Democrats have held the position that some lives are disposable. The party was, therefore against the abolition of slavery. The same view supports abortion as they view the unborn baby as disposable. https://www.coursehero.com/file/p5gmsch/Core-principles-The-opposing-party-to-the-Democrats-party-is-the-republicans/ The rights and dignity of the individual remain the core principal of the Republican party, be it opposition to slavery, abortion, big government, or high taxes.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The party claims as part of its legacy of the [[Jim Crow]] era a long history of [[Democrat election fraud]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theredelephants.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/try.mp4?_=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; election tampering, [[voter suppression]], and ballot box stuffing at the polls that continues to this very day.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/09/from-hanging-chads-to-ballot-creep-democrats-are-perfecting-post-election-heists/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It is currently controlled by international [[globalism|globalist]]s whose principle aim is the overthrow of American [[democracy]] and free elections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A core tenet of the Democratic party is opposition to the principle of &amp;quot;one person, one vote&amp;quot;, be it the original insistence on a [[Three-Fifths Compromise|3/5's rule]] for minorities among its early promulgators or the election rigging by [[Dominion Voting Systems]] in the [[2020 Presidential election]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biden junta==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Sedition|}}&lt;br /&gt;
As of Novemeber 2020 [[Peter Neffenger]] was chairman of the [[corrupt]] [[voter fraud|ballot-stuffing]] and [[election fraud|election-rigging]] [[Dominion_Voting_Systems#Smartmatic|SmartMatic]] corporation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.smartmatic.com/us/about/board-of-directors/detail/peter-neffenger/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Neffenger was appointed to the [[Biden junta]] organizational team.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.air.tv/watch?v=ir00pXx9QsKbvSdjsCy3nQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://cybersummitusa.com/2017/06/navid-nia/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with 35 years experience performing technical assessment, mathematical modeling, cyber-attack pattern analysis, and&lt;br /&gt;
security [[counterintelligence]] linked to foreign intelligence service operators, including [[China]], [[Iran]], [[North Korea]], and [[Russia]] and who has worked as a consultant and subject-matter expert supporting the [[Department of Defense]], [[FBI]] and US [[Intelligence Community]] (USIC) agencies such as the [[DIA]], [[CIA]], [[NSA]], NGA [National Geospatial Agency], and the [[DHS]] I&amp;amp;A [Office of Intelligence and Analysis] supporting counterintelligence, and [[law enforcement]] investigations and whom the ''[[New York Times]]'' describes as the &amp;quot;always the smartest person in the room,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/09/opinion/sunday/garrison-courtney-spies-contracts.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; testified under oath Smartmatic and its role in the [[2020 Presidential election]] thusly:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;In my expert opinion, the DVS [ [[Dominion Voting Systems]] ] Democracy Suite, [[Scytl]]/SOE Software/eClarity and Smartmatic have not produced auditable results in the 2020 election. It is evident that ballots were not properly validated, system records were not kept, and the system experience considerable instability even several days prior to November 4, 2020 that require DVS to implement software changes at the last minute. In addition, the disparity in data distribution after 4:30 AM on November 4, 2020 indicates significant systemic anomalies that were widespread among all battleground states. The evidence is both extensive and persuasive and indicates large-scale [[fraud]] by remote operators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I conclude that a combination of lost cryptographic key contained on stolen USB memory cards, serious exploitable system and [[software]] vulnerabilities and operating system backdoor in DVS, Scytl, SOE Software/eClarity and Smartmatic created the perfect environment to commit widespread fraud in all states where these systems are installed. My analysis of the 2020 Election from ''NY Times'' data shows statistical anomalies across the battleground state votes. These failures are widespread and systemic - and sufficient to invalidate the [[vote]] counts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I conclude with high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all [[swing states|battleground states]] resulting in a hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for [[President Trump]] to be transferred to [[Vice President Biden]]. These alterations were the result of systemic and widespread exploitable vulnerabilities in DVS, Scytl/SOE Software and Smartmatic systems that enabled operators to achieve&lt;br /&gt;
the desired results. In my view, the evidence is overwhelming and incontrovertible.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.1.19.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign collusion===&lt;br /&gt;
On September 12, 2018, by President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 13848 entitled, “Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In that executive order President Trump declared a national emergency and the 2020 presidential election was conducted under this state of emergency.  The order states that people and organizations located, in part, outside the [[United States]] are known to be able to, {{quotebox|“interfere in or undermine public confidence in United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of [[election]] and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of [[propaganda]] and [[disinformation]].”  The EO further states that this foreign interference in U.S. elections, “constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the [[national security]] and [[foreign policy]] of the United States.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
Di Dongsheng, a vice-dean at the School of International Relations at Renmin University in Beijing, made public statements before a large audience on November 28, 2020:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|&amp;quot;We know that the Trump administration is in a trade war with us, so why can’t we fix the Trump administration? Why did China and the US used to be able to settle all kinds of issues between 1992 and 2016?&amp;quot; he asked. &amp;quot;I’m going to throw out something maybe a little bit explosive here. It’s just because we have people at the top. We have our old friends who are at the top of America’s core inner circle of power and influence.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;During the US-China trade war, [[Wall Street]] tried to help, and I know that my friends on the US side told me that they tried to help, but they couldn’t do much. But now we’re seeing Biden was elected, the traditional elite, the political elite, the establishment, they’re very close to Wall Street, so you see that, right?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Trump has been saying that Biden’s son has some sort of global foundation. Have you noticed that? Who helped [Hunter] build the foundations? Got it? There are a lot of deals inside all these.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/12/08/top_chinese_intellectual_boasts_about_old_friends_who_are_at_the_top_of_americas_core_inner_circle_of_power_and_influence.html#!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/lyQUtPEBBSA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thepostmillennial.com/watch-tucker-carlson-exposes-how-media-democrats-have-been-working-on-behalf-of-china/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biden putsch===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Democrat election fraud|Biden Putsch}}&lt;br /&gt;
At 2:30 AM EDT of the 4th of November 2020, TV broadcasts reported that Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada and Georgia decided to cease vote counting operations and would continue the following day. This unanimous decision to initially and intentionally stop counting by all five battleground states was unprecedented, and it demonstrates prior coordination by election officials in battleground states.  This allowed for more time to manufacture fraudulent ballots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==117th Congress==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Blue-wave.jpg|left|250px|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
As the 117th Congress was sworn in, one thing was certain and obvious to the American people: the Democratic party no longer had any regard or respect for [[democracy]] and the [[human rights]] of other people. The Democratic party organization, from poll workers, to members of the [[civil service system]], to elected officials, had rejected the fundamental tenets of a [[two-party system]] and embraced full-fledged [[single party control|single party]] [[communism]] and [[totalitarianism]], including rigged elections, [[censorship]], lack of [[due process]] rights, a rejection of the right of free association, a perverted [[law enforcement]] and [[judicial]] system, wholesale domestic spying, a [[globalism|globalized]] and [[collectivist]] [[planned economy]], a rejection of [[God]] and [[religion]], and an attack on the rights of armed citizens to defend themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ideology==&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party's failed [[Trump-Russia collusion hoax]] destroyed the American people's faith in [[mainstream media]] news coverage and brought a cloud over the perception of the American system of government throughout much of the world. &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Biden racial jungle.jpeg|left|200px|thumb|Biden: &amp;quot;My children are going to grow up in a jungle, the jungle being a racial jungle.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-racial-jungle-quote/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On August 18, 2020, the Democratic Party officially nominated Joseph Biden as its presidential candidate in the 2020 election.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 2020, elected Democrat mayors and governors threatened with arrest citizens going to church, funerals, graduation parties, or even playing with their children in public parks while giving license to violent leftwing mobs to riot, loot, burn down churches and shopping districts in minority communities, take taxpayers hostage in broad sections of a city, and to murder innocent people, including the police.  When an armed mob of leftist insurrectionists took over and occupied a seven square block area of [[Seattle]], local and state elected Democrat officials did not respond to requests from citizens and taxpayers to protect property and liberate from oppression 8,000 residents held hostage.  The DNC partners with the [[Antifa]] [[terrorist]] organization for fundraising.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://noqreport.com/2020/07/19/action-network-bonds-antifa-blm-riots-and-dnc-at-the-hip/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The party is pro-infanticide, pro-[[illegal immigrant]] rights over American citizens,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hotair.com/archives/john-s-2/2019/07/03/fareed-zakaria-current-immigration-crisis-caused-people-gaming-asylum-laws/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[pro-abortion]], anti-capitalist and anti-[[free enterprise]], supports confiscatory taxation, resource redistribution, wealth transfer from American citizens to illegal immigrants,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2018/02/26/how-american-citizens-finance-health-care-for-undocumented-immigrants/#2185177612c4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  abuse of asylum laws,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.westernjournal.com/hermancain/pelosi-deeply-disappointed-deal-mexico-reduces-abuse-u-s-asylum-laws/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2018/06/20/democrats-have-zero-tolerance-for-illegal-immigration-solutions/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[single party]] [[socialism]], election cheating, rigged nomination and election process, dictatorial regulation by unelected partisan [[Civil service system|civil servants]], anti-First, Second, Fourth and Fifth Amendments opposing [[due process]] rights of the accused, and a dictatorial central controlling government.  Democrats are anti-free speech, religion, the Constitutional electoral process, [[separation of powers]], and advocate court-packing.  Elected Democrat officials have refused to protect the lives and property of citizen taxpayers who voted for them, paid for emergency police, fire, and medical services, and pay their salary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats have become [[radical]]ized, [[elitism|elitist]], have abandoned the interests of working people, and their leaders have endorsed violence to promote &amp;quot;change.&amp;quot;  By contrast, the [[Republican Party]] is generally [[pro-life]] and pro-free enterprise, supporting lower taxes, gun rights, individual liberty, small responsible government,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.diffen.com/difference/Democrat_vs_Republican#Role_of_Government&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  tolerance, the two party system,  and the free, open exchange of ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The party has been taken over by Marxists.  It has won the praise of the [[Communist Party of the United States of America|Communist Party USA]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Varney, James (June 19, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/19/communist-party-usa-praises-democrat-policy-shifts/ Communist Party, USA praises Democrats' policy shifts ahead of centennial celebration]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 19, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Chumley, Cheryl K. (January 29, 2015). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jan/29/communist-party-usa-working-with-the-democratic-pa/ Communist Party USA: 'Working with the Democratic Party' is key]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved September 26, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is dominated by [[progressive]] [[Millennial]]s indoctrinated with [[Cultural Marxism]] from [[public school]]s and state universities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5439334O&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Violence]], [[Anti-Semitism]], [[intolerance]], [[gender psychosis]], [[infanticide]], promoting [[racial]] divisiveness, pandering, [[patronage]],  [[censorship]], eliminating beef from the American diet, and tearing down America's automobile and airline infrastructure have replaced justice, fairness, tolerance and economic wellbeing as priority issues.  The party rejects God and claims [[science]] is the ultimate determiner of truth yet rejects the scientific fact that medical treatment cannot turn a man into a woman. The party has adopted the [[pseudoscience|pseudoscientific]] position that [[reparations|slave reparations]], a [[universal basic income]], and [[single payer|single payer healthcare]] will reduce [[global warming|carbon emissions]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Green New Deal]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Labor union]]s, which once formed the backbone of the [[New Deal]] and [[Great Society]] coalitions, have been decimated by [[globalism]]. Working peoples' jobs have been shipped overseas to promote &amp;quot;[[equality]]&amp;quot; with the &amp;quot;[[Third World]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;If &amp;quot;Third World&amp;quot; is a &amp;quot;racist code word&amp;quot; as some progressives contend, it was coined by liberal academics, United Nations experts, and globalists during the [[Cold War]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Formerly industrious working families have been pacified by [[big government]] and taxpayer-supported narcotic addiction with [[opioid]]s, which Democrats claim to be a fundamental &amp;quot;human right.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Political observers and news sources have referred to the Democrat Party as more of a criminal organization (and in at least one case, even a domestic terrorist organization&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [https://drhurd.com/2020/06/07/the-democratic-party-is-now-a-terrorist-organization/ The Democratic Party is Now a Terrorist Organization]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
than an actual political party because of its history of corruption, racism, hate, lawlessness (including their ignorance of the Constitution except where convenient to them), anti-Americanism (including collusion with anti-American foreign and domestic enemies), lack of regard for life, lack of regard for civil rights (except where and when convenient to them alone) and fomentation of anarchy and insurrection against the United States,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple sources:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/09/a_criminal_enterprise_aka_the_democratic_party.html A Criminal Enterprise, a.k.a. the Democratic Party] at the American Thinker&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/02/the_democrats_a_corrupt_insane_posse_masquerading_as_a_political_party.html The Democrats: A Corrupt, Insane Posse Masquerading as a Political Party] at the American Thinker&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/michael-walsh/2016/08/16/the-democrats-a-criminal-organization-n47572 The Democrats: A Criminal Organization...]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/democratic-party-is-a-criminal-corrupt-organization Democratic Party is a criminal corrupt organization] at Fellowship of the Minds&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.wnd.com/2012/07/ex-time-editor-dem-party-criminal-organization/ Ex-Time editor: Dem Party 'criminal organization'] at WorldNetDaily&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/caruba/131017 A criminal enterprise called the Democratic Party]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://canadafreepress.com/article/a-citizens-indictment Democratic Party has become a Continuing Criminal Enterprise] at Canada Free Press&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WJJBdN2QgA The Democratic Party is America's largest criminal organization] at Josh Bernstein YouTube channel&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ypr11PvaCpI Glen Beck identifies largest criminal organization in US history, the National Democrat Party] at DrWrongPaul YouTube channel&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w994YjfJbqk Democrats are a Criminal Organization | The Andrew Klavan Show Ep. 938] at the Daily Wire YouTube channel&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-biden-harris-democrats-pro-criminal Tucker Carlson accuses Biden, Harris of embracing 'the Democratic Party's new pro-criminal agenda'] at Fox News&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and have criticized the Democrats as a whole for their refusal to take any responsibility for their actions and [[liberal projection|to accuse the Republican Party and its supporters]] of exactly what the Democrats are guilty of, including playing the [[historical revisionism]] card with the American public&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/06/democratic-party-racist-history-mona-charen/ Whitewashing the Democratic Party’s History] at the National Review&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://ammo.com/articles/jim-crow-laws-democrat-party-century-of-racist-history Democrats &amp;amp; Jim Crow: A Century of Racist History the Democratic Party Prefers You'd Forget]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and using a willing and complicit [[liberal media]] to do so.  Even President [[Donald Trump]] has referred to the Democrats as the party of crime because of its support for defunding (and in some cases, abolishing) local police forces and giving domestic terrorist groups such as Antifa and Black Lives Matter free reign to engage in violent rioting, commit crimes against the public and basically do as they please with impunity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhwBo9_8Qn8 &amp;quot;Democrats have become the party of crime!&amp;quot; President Trump]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thecommonsenseshow.com/activism-agenda-21-immigration/democratic-party-domestic-terrorist-organization-dnc-connections-china-terrorists-and-cartels-part  The Democratic Party Is a Domestic Terrorist Organization-DNC Connections to China, Terrorists and the Cartels (Part 3)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Leftwing violence===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Racist Democrats.jpeg|right|350px|thumb|[[Marxist]] [[white supremacist]]s defaced the Monument to the all-volunteer Black 54th Massachusetts Regiment of Union Soldiers in the [[Civil War]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Connor Betts]], dressed in all black, killed 9 people including several [[African American]]s and injured 27 in a [[Dayton shooting|shooting at a Dayton, Ohio restaurant]]. He described himself on his Twitter account page as &amp;quot;leftist / i’m going to hell and i’m not coming back.” He wrote on Twitter that he would happily vote for Democrat [[Elizabeth Warren]], praised [[Satan]], was upset about the [[2016 presidential election]] results, and added, “I want [[socialism]], and i’ll not wait for the idiots to finally come round to understanding.” The Greene County Board of Elections lists his party as “Dem.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://heavy.com/news/2019/08/connor-betts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patrick Crausius, a 21 year old registered [[Democrat]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/leftists-change-shooter-patrick-crusiuss-mylife-page-after-saturday-shooting-from-democrat-to-republican/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[El Paso Walmart shooting|killed 20 people and injured 26 at a Walmart in El Paso, Texas]].  The shooter was a supporter of universal healthcare, universal basic income, racist, [[environmentalist]] and [[zero sum]] anti-corporate anti-[[economic growth]] policies. In a manifesto the shooter wrote,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.paypervids.com/alleged-el-paso-texas-walmart-shooter-manifesto/ ]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;The inconvenient truth is that our leaders, both Democrat AND Republican, have been failing us for decades. They are either complacent or involved in one of the biggest betrayals of the American public in our history. The takeover of the United States government by unchecked corporations.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;America will have to initiate a basic universal income to prevent widespread poverty and civil unrest as people lose their jobs..&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;Achieving ambitious social projects like [[universal healthcare]] and [[UBI]] would become far more likely to succeed if tens of millions of dependents are removed.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;immigration will make one of the biggest issues of our time, [[automation]], so much worse. Some sources say that in under two decades, half of American jobs will be lost to it.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;our lifestyle Is destroying the environment of our country. The decimation of the environment is creating a massive burden for future generations. Corporations are heading the destruction of our environment by shamelessly overharvesting resources.&amp;quot;'' &lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;Consumer culture is creating thousands of tons of unnecessary plastic waste and electronic waste.... We even use god knows how many trees worth of paper towels just wipe water off our hands. ... The government is unwilling to tackle these issues beyond empty promises since they are owned by corporations. Corporations that also like immigration because more people means a bigger market for their products. ... So the next logical step is to decrease the number of people in America using resources.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;This will also make the elites that run corporations realize that it’s not in their interest to continue piss off Americans. Corporate America doesn’t need to be destroyed, but just shown that they are on the wrong side of history.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;the idea of deporting or murdering all non-white Americans is horrific. Many have been here at least as long as the whites, and have done as much to build our country. The best solution to this for now would be to divide America into a confederacy of territories with at least one territory for each race. &amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
:*''&amp;quot;I know that the media will probably call me a white supremacist anyway and blame Trump’s rhetoric. The media is infamous for [[fake news]]. Their reaction to this attack will likely just confirm that.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Democrat racism, intolerance and bigotry===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Blexit}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrat Party has normalized&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thefederalist.com/2019/03/07/democratic-party-has-normalized-anti-semitism/ The Democratic Party Has Normalized Anti-Semitism], David Harsany, ''The Federalist'', March 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and become the home of modern anti-Semitism in America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murphy, James (March 8, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/congress/item/31685-do-democrats-have-an-anti-semitism-problem Do Democrats Have an Anti-Semitism Problem?] ''The New American''. Retrieved March 8, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.jns.org/opinion/anti-semitism-has-a-history-in-the-democratic-party/ Anti-Semitism has a history in the Democratic Party], Diane Bederman, Jews News Syndicate, March 20, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After making statements critical of the [[Obama]] and Trump administration's handling of migrants,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ushmm.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.ushmm.org/information/press/press-releases/statement-regarding-the-museums-position-on-holocaust-analogies&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rep. [[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]] was condemned by the United States Holocaust Museum for mocking the deaths of [[Nazi]] [[holocaust]] victims.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ushmm.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/06/24/holocaust-museum-comparisons/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Farrakhanclinton.jpg|left|350ox|thumb|Democrats push anti-Semitism into the mainstream. [[Al Sharpton]], [[Jesse Jackson]] and [[Bill Clinton]] appear on stage with notorious anti-Semite [[Louis Farrakhan]], September 2018. Within a month, America suffered the worst mass killing of Jews in its history at the Tree of Life synagogue in [[Pittsburgh]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jta.org/2018/09/07/news-opinion/bill-clinton-shared-stage-louis-farrakhan-aretha-franklins-funeral&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Ettie Kryksman writing in the ''Times of Israel'' noted: &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;there is scant protest coming from within the Democratic Party of Democratic Officials and activists, who see no shame in hobnobbing with avowed [[antisemite]]s. The Democratic Party that condones this behavior either vocally or tacitly in their silence, is no longer a welcoming place for [[Jew]]s.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Where are the voices of the Leftist Jews condemning the antisemitism that has hijacked the Democratic Party? Are Jewish [[Democrat]]s willing to tolerate and excuse the rise of antisemitism in their party? Has [[Judaism]] for them become so politicized that it has been replaced by [[Liberalism]]?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The distinction between the two is lost when Jews ignore the antisemitism that has invaded the Democratic Party's leadership. The widespread antisemitism in the Democratic Party, has manifested itself... [Linda] Sarsour was later championed by Democratic Senator [[Kirsten Gillibrand]] who thought Sarsour was a wonderful role model for all women.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Democratic rallies shout anti Israel slogans against the &amp;quot;[[apartheid]] state of [[Israel]].&amp;quot; Pro Israel speakers are shouted down at college campuses by [[progressive]] [[leftist]]s, who refuse to allow them to speak. Events are canceled as event organizers yield to [[bullying]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/antisemitism-and-the-democratic-party-time-for-jews-to-wake-up/ Antisemitism and the Democratic Party: Time for Jews to Wake Up], Ettie Kryksman, ''Times of Israel'', April 10, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} The [[U.S. State Department]] has on its website as part of its definition of anti-Semitism: {{quotebox| Making mendacious, dehumanizing, [[demonizing]], or [[stereotype|stereotypical]] allegations about [[Jew]]s as such or the power of Jews as [[collective]] — such as, especially but not exclusively, the [[myth]] about a world Jewish [[conspiracy]] or of Jews controlling the [[media]], [[economy]], [[government]] or other societal institutions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.state.gov/s/rga/resources/267538.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Trump-antisemitic-3.jpg|right|350px|thumb|A blatantly [[anti-Semitic]] cartoon depicting [[Israel]]i [[Prime Minister]] [[Benjamin Netanyahu]] as a guide dog with a [[Star of David]] collar leading a blind [[President Trump]] wearing a skullcap. The cartoon accompanied an op-ed published 4/25/19 in the International Edition of the ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/homenews/media/440957-ny-times-opinion-apologizes-for-cartoon-depicting-anti-semitic-tropes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Two days later, a Trump-hater shot up a California [[synagogue]], killing one and injuring several. The shooter left a manifesto calling President Trump a “Zionist, Anti-White, Traitorous, C*********.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.is/9rV3Y&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
DNC Vice Chair Keith Ellison met with the antisemitic [[UK]] [[Labour party]] leader [[Jeremy Corbyn]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/keithellison/status/1146183139506708480&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Democratic-controlled [[House of Representatives]], under [[Speaker Nancy Pelosi]], refused to pass a resolution rebuking Rep. Ilhan Omar for a persistent pattern of anti-Semitic statements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/house-passes-resolution-indirectly-calling-out-omars-anti-semitic-comments-without-mentioning-her-name&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/03/house-democrats-anti-hate-resolution-anti-semitism-islamophobia-ilhan-omar.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Omar received support from [[Ku Klux Klan]] Grand Wizard and former Democrat presidential candidate [[David Duke]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2019/03/07/david-duke-ilhan-omar-important-congress/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The [[Southern Poverty Law Center]] ignored the anti-Semitic [[hate speech]] by Democrat members of Congress.  Imam Omar Suleiman, who has called for the destruction of the State of Israel, was invited to deliver the noon prayer in the House of Representatives. The imam had been invited by Rep. [[Eddie Bernice Johnson]] of Texas. (D–TX).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/15/democrats-behest-terrorist-friendly-imam-gives-prayer-congress/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Valerie Plame]] announced her candidacy for the House. Plame promoted anti-Semitic materials on Twitter, a scandal that forced her resignation from the Ploughshares Fund.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thefederalist.com/2019/05/13/coverage-valerie-plames-run-congress-ignores-anti-semitism/ Coverage Of Valerie Plame’s Run For Congress Ignores Her Anti-Semitism], By Warren Henry, ''The Federalist'', May 13, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Georgia Democrat house minority leader Erica Thomas claimed a white man told her to &amp;quot;Go back where you came from&amp;quot; while standing in a supermarket express lane. The man, a [[Cuba]]n American, loyal Democrat straight party line voter who hates Trump, supports [[the Squad]], and once Tweeted that Trump should go back to Germany, denied the accusation. Thomas later recanted her claim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxbH13jn3NY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nieto, Phillip (July 21, 2019). [https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/21/georgia-lawmaker-caught-lying-racist-encounter/ Georgia Democratic Lawmaker Appears To Be Caught Lying About Alleged Racist Encounter]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved July 21, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bufkin, Ellie (July 21, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/georgia-state-rep-erica-thomas-backtracks-on-racism-accusations Georgia state Rep. Erica Thomas backtracks on racism accusations]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved July 21, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nolte, John (July 22, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/22/nolte-media-blame-trump-for-grocery-store-spat-between-two-democrats/ Nolte: Media Blame Trump for Grocery Store Spat Between Two Democrats]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 22, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtGC7y9BtHA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A store clerk employee then came forward alleging Thomas herself told the Cuban to go back to where he came from.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWOEW-XDMzg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Democrat politicians elected to Congress in 2018 were vocal in ridiculing Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkwood, R. Cort (December 13, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/30918-the-democratic-party-s-new-face-congressional-muslims-who-ridicule-christians-and-more The Democratic Party’s New Face: Congressional Muslims Who Ridicule Christians and More]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 13, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;breitbart.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (December 15, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/12/15/ilhan-omar-trolls-mike-pence-jesus-take-the-wheel/ Ilhan Omar Trolls Mike Pence: ‘Jesus Take the Wheel’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 16, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A man was arrested for burning several historically Black churches in [[Louisiana]]. The suspect was heavily involved in anti-Christian music, [[satanism]] and [[paganism]].  In a [[Colorado]] high school shooting, a [[gender confusion|gender-confused]] registered Democrat and Barack Obama fan killed one person and injured nine others in deranged rampage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://heavy.com/news/2019/05/devon-erickson-devin/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A Democrat charged with pedophilia won a primary vote against an incumbent who supported [[Virginia]]'s racist Democrat Governor Ralph Northam.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://freebeacon.com/politics/virginia-democrat-charged-with-sex-with-a-minor-wins-primary-for-state-senate/ Virginia Democrat Who Was Charged With Sex With a Minor Wins Primary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The national Democratic Governors Association (DGA) contributed over $6 million to Northam's campaign and praised him after near universal calls for his resignation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/DemGovs/status/1149367001363701761&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Travis County [[Texas]] Municipal Judge Sarah Eckhard mocked a disabled person in a wheelchair at a leftist gathering in the capital city of Austin; Texas Gov.[[Greg Abbott]] was paralyzed when a tree fell on him, and pretending to be an [[environmentalist]], Judge Eckard joked &amp;quot;Abbott hates trees cause one fell on him.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/28/texas-democrat-forced-to-apologize-for-saying-gov-greg-abbott-hates-trees-because-one-fell-on-him/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   In [[Pennsylvania]], a Democrat state representative streamed on [[social media]] his harassment of a woman senior citizen praying outside an abortion clinic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.tmn.today/2019/05/democrat-rep-harasses-elderly-woman-praying-outside-planned-parenthood/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Kentucky]], voters overwhelmingly rejected the Democrats' racist agenda, electing the state's first black [[Attorney General]] and first Republican in 70 years, [[Daniel Cameron]]. Four years earlier, Kentucky voters elected conservative Republican Jenean Hampton as the state's first black statewide elected official, and the Republican governor they elected, [[Matt Bevin]], had adopted four children from Ethiopia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Anti-semitism===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Left-wing Anti-Semitism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2019-05-30 17-27-08.jpg|150px|right|thumb|AOC flashing a [[white supremacist]] hand sign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-05-30/aoc-white-supremacist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Rep. [[Rashida Tlaib]] supports the [[Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions|BDS movement]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chasmar, Jessica (December 4, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/4/rashida-tlaib-newly-elected-democrat-endorses-anti/ Democratic Rep.-elect Rashida Tlaib endorses anti-Israel BDS movement]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 5, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Tlaib made a [[Liberal bigotry|bigoted]] tweet accusing Jewish-Americans of having divided loyalties, an attack frequently made by anti-Semites.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Starr, Penny (January 7, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/07/democrat-rashida-tlaib-blasted-for-antisemitic-tweet-accusing-dual-loyalty-israel-bds/ Democrat Rashida Tlaib Blasted for Antisemitic Tweet: ‘They Forgot What Country They Represent’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 7, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Re, Gregg (January 7, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rashida-tlaib-accused-of-anti-semitic-slur-days-after-profane-anti-trump-tirade Rashida Tlaib accused of anti-Semitic slur, days after profane anti-Trump tirade]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 8, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She wrote at least one op-ed on [[Louis Farrakhan]]'s website.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Caruso, Justin (February 11, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/11/report-rashida-tlaib-wrote-op-ed-for-antisemite-louis-farrakhans-website/ Report: Rashida Tlaib Wrote Op-Ed for Antisemite Louis Farrakhan’s Website]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved February 11, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Mikelionis, Lukas (February 12, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rashida-tlaib-once-wrote-column-for-nation-of-islams-publication-reprinting-farrakhans-anti-semitic-comments Rashida Tlaib wrote column for Louis Farrakhan publication in 2006]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved February 12, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Kirkwood, R. Cort (February 12, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/31469-tlaib-published-in-farrakhan-newspaper-with-omar-still-has-committee-assignments Tlaib Published in Farrakhan Newspaper, Still Has Committee Assignments]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 12, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Tlaib did a selfie with a [[Hezbollah]]-praising activist to also denied Israel's right to exist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Klein, Philip (January 14, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/democrat-rep-rashida-tlaib-photographed-with-pro-hezbollah-activist-who-says-israel-has-no-right-to-exist Democrat Rep. Rashida Tlaib photographed with pro-Hezbollah activist who says Israel has no right to exist]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved January 14, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Valerie (January 14, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/14/pro-hezbollah-activist-posts-photos-rashida-tlaib/ Pro-Hezbollah activist posts photos with Rashida Tlaib at swearing-in ceremony]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Brest, Michael (January 14, 2019). [https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/14/israel-palestine-tlaib-picture-extremist-abbas-hamideh/ Anti-Israel Extremist Says He was At Tlaib's Private Dinner After Swearing In]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved January 15, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Danan, Deborah (January 15, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2019/01/15/democrat-rep-rashida-tlaib-poses-with-pro-hezbollah-rabid-anti-israel-activist/ Rashida Tlaib Poses with Pro-Hezbollah Activist]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 15, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''New York Magazine'' named her one of 10 activists who may become the future of the Democratic Party as the &amp;quot;new Obama.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/muslim-woman-congress-shes-also-palestinian-869782483 Middle East Eye, Multimedia 'Staying out of the ring is not an option’: Palestinian woman runs for Congress], Ali Harb Friday 23 March 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Tlaib was sworn in surrounded by a group that included Sarsour and Nihad Awad as her special guests.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://bigleaguepolitics.com/new-muslim-congresswoman-invites-linda-sarsour-and-cair-representative-as-her-guests-to-congressional-ceremony/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rep. [[Ilhan Omar]] is known for her anti-Semitism,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2019/01/17/ilhan-omar-tweet-controversy/2603030002/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; insensitivity and mocking remarks about [[Christian]]s,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;breitbart.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and [[homophobic]] comments directed against colleagues.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democrat-ilhan-omar-accused-of-breathtaking-bigotry-after-saying-lindsey-graham-is-compromised&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/17/rep-ilhan-omar-furthers-homophobic-conspiracy-that-lindsey-grahams-compromised/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Omar tweeted &amp;quot;[[Israel]] has hypnotized the world, may [[Allah]] awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel.&amp;quot; Omar supports BDS.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/01/18/cnn-not-know-question-ilhan-omars-conspiracy-theories-anti-semitism/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/269488770066313216&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (January 28, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/28/zoa-slams-adl-for-accepting-ilhan-omar-non-apology-for-antisemitism/ ZOA Slams ADL for Accepting Ilhan Omar’s Non-Apology for Antisemitic Rhetoric]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 28, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Omar claims congressional support for Israel is &amp;quot;All about the Benjamins baby,&amp;quot; a reference to the Ben Franklin $100 bill, implying members of Congress are paid off by [[AIPAC]]. Despite this, Democrats gave her a seat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tapscott, Mark (January 21, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/gop-punishes-steve-king-anti-semitic-dem-gets-choice-committee_2774145.html GOP Punishes Steve King, Anti-Semitic Dem Gets Choice Committee]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fourth-ranking Democrat in the House, Rep. [[Hakeem Jeffries]], defended Tlaib and Omar as &amp;quot;thoughtful colleagues.&amp;quot; Tlaib is a member of a [[Facebook]] group that posts anti-Semitic videos and memes. ''The Daily Caller'' reported that a key fundraiser for Tlaib posted a [[Holocaust denial]] video.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dem-lawmaker-defends-house-freshmen-accused-of-anti-semitism-as-thoughtful-colleagues&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Blexit, WalkAway and Jexodus===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:COM.FIG1.gif|right|350px|thumb|Communist megamurders, 1900–1987. Source: Prof. R.J. Rummel. Two-thirds were killed by governments, quasi-governments, and guerrillas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/COM.ART.HTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
''[[USA Today]]'' reported that President Trump's popularity among African Americans is higher than any Republican president in decades.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/08/16/trump-approval-rating-african-americans-rasmussen-poll/1013212002/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is not surprising given that Blacks have suffered most from illegal immigration. Since Democrats established the entitlement dole, Blacks' income and employment have been stepped over by [[Korea]]n and [[Vietnam]]ese war refugees and virtually all [[immigrant]] groups. ''Conservative News and Views'' reported, &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|Just as [[Candace Owens]] has spearheaded the “[[Blexit]]” movement, Bawer writes, inspiring “black Americans to recognize the damage done to them by the [[Great Society]] and its aftermath [and to] leave the [[Democratic plantation]], so has [[Brandon Straka]] led other [[gay]]s to see that they’ve been “served a bill of goods by the [[mainstream media]] and Democratic Party and is now heading his [[WalkAway]] campaign.” But what about the Jews?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, whaddaya know? Here comes Elizabeth Pipko, a 23-year-old Jewish figure skater-turned-model who, in an effort to aid a “mass Jewish exodus from the Democratic party,” has popularized the “JEXODUS” movement” initiated by Republican activist Jeff Ballabon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Right now,&amp;quot; Ms. Pipko said, &amp;quot;as a Jewish person, you cannot support the Democratic Party and support the Jewish people at the same time.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.conservativenewsandviews.com/2019/03/13/news/anti-semitism-parade-everything-old-new/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political positions==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Democrat urban issues}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;{{cquote|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;We choose truth over facts.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;|||[[Joseph Biden#Segregation|Segregation]]ist and former V.P. [[Joseph Biden]].}}&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Davell Gardner Jr.png|right|200px|thumb|1 year old Davell Gardner, Jr. was murdered by peaceful [[Black Lives Matter]] protesters&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/NGBSCJ0dyyU&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while in his stroller after Democrats cut $1 billion from the New York Police Department.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2020/07/13/go-to-hell-gardner-family-slain-toddler-tells-killers/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Virtually all political positions, foreign and domestic, have been determined by how it redounds to the expansion of the civil service workforce, state and federal, and to the benefit of the existing civil service.  This has been historically true since passage of the Civil Service Act in 1882, and was the basis of the Jacksonian [[spoils system]] and founding of the party. Democrat candidates campaign on, and Democrats voters vote for, government jobs and goodies and who will be called upon to hand out money from the public treasury. All policy discussion and decisions regarding national security, foreign policy, and domestic programs are based upon this basic tenet of controlling and expanding the power of the civil service workforce.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Half of all homeless persons in America live in the blue state of California, which has enacted voter suppression legislation against Republicans to keep President Trump off the ballot. Although unemployment is at record lows, blue states still lead the nation in crime and homelessness.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party has persistently attempted to restrict gun ownership rights of blacks, Hispanics, and all other minorities at all levels, state and federal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1534&amp;amp;context=faculty_scholarship&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_tOilPSHaM&amp;amp;list=PLuq9rBpmQwBRX_EExUHbChmECDSUf8dD0 Black Gun Owners SHRED Media Narrative About 'White Nationalist' Gun Rally]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Democrats seek to disarm Blacks, where only cops and criminals have guns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Critical race theory===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Critical theory}}&lt;br /&gt;
Derrick Bell,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/derrick-bell/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Barack Obama]]’s favorite [[Harvard]] professor,  devised Critical Race Theory,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/critical-race-theorys-toxic-destructive-impact-on-america&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which exemplifies Lenin’s strategy as applied to race.  According to Discover the Networks:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|Critical race theory contends that America is permanently racist to its core, and that consequently the nation’s legal structures are, by definition, racist and invalid … members of “oppressed” racial groups are entitled—in fact obligated—to determine for themselves which laws and traditions have merit and are worth observing. …}}&lt;br /&gt;
Bell’s theory is in turn an innovation of [[Critical Theory]], which was developed by Marxist thinkers of the [[Frankfurt School]] in Frankfurt, Germany, in 1923. The Institute’s left-wing scholars fled Hitler’s Germany in the 1930s, relocating to [[Columbia University]] in New York. Critical Theory, which discredits all aspects of Western society, we know today as [[political correctness]]. One of its most famous purveyors was the Frankfurt School’s [[Herbert Marcuse]], longtime associate of the [[Southern Poverty Law Center]]’s [[Julian Bond]]. Marcuse invented the concept of “partisan tolerance,” that is, [[tolerance]] for leftist ideas and [[intolerance]] of all others. The Southern Poverty Law Center applied Marcuse’s strategy in developing its “Hate Watch” list, and ''[[Rules for Radicals]]'' author [[Saul Alinsky]] used it in his own life’s work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The “racist” narrative was turbocharged with the concept of “White Privilege,” the notion that whites—the dominant [[demographic]] group in capitalist America—are irretrievably racist, [[sexist]], [[homophobic]], [[xenophobic]], [[imperialist]]ic oppressors who exploit everyone. Whites are the only true [[evil]] in the world and should be exterminated. “Dr. Kamau Kambon, who taught Africana Studies 241 in the Spring 2005 semester at North Carolina State University, also said this needs to be done ‘because white people want to kill us.’”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[https://www.carolinajournal.com/news-article/activist-exterminate-white-people/ Activist: exterminate white people],'' by Jon Sanders, Carolina Journal, Oct. 21, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The New Abolitionism===&lt;br /&gt;
The “White Skin Privilege” idea was created in 1967 by [[Noel Ignatiev]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fernando, Ivan (November 18, 2013). [http://diversitychronicle.wordpress.com/2013/11/18/progressive-professor-urges-white-male-students-to-commit-suicide-during-class/ &amp;quot;Progressive professor urges white male students to commit suicide during class&amp;quot;]. Diversity Chronicle website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; an acolyte of Derrick Bell and professor at Harvard’s W.E.B. Du Bois Institute. Ignatiev was a member of the [[Communist Party USA]]’s most radical wing, the Provisional Organizing Committee to Reconstitute the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party from 1958–66. The Provisional Organizing Committee was the intellectual forerunner to the [[Freedom Road Socialist Organization]], a [[Vanguardism|vanguard]] group.  Writing under the alias Noel Ignatin, Ignatiev co-authored a [[Students for a Democratic Society]] (SDS) pamphlet with fellow radical Ted Allen titled, ''White Blindspot''. In 1992 he co-founded ''Race Traitor: Journal of the New Abolitionism''. Its first issue coined the slogan “Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” Its stated objective was to “abolish the white race.” More specifically, the ''New Abolitionist'' newsletter declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|The way to abolish the white race is to challenge, disrupt and eventually overturn the institutions and behavior patterns that reproduce the privileges of whiteness, including the schools, job and housing markets, and the criminal justice system. The abolitionists do not limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, but reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://capitalresearch.org/article/blm-roots/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rectification and self examination===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Maoism|Rectification|}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:BLM rectification.PNG|right|300px|thumb|A white woman accosted on the street with a demand to kneel and apologize for her whiteness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/AnnCoulter/status/1267734418241830912&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The concept of white privilege has been compared to the Maoist [[rectification movement]], which is described as &amp;quot;the largest, darkest, and most ferocious power game ever played out in the human world. In the name of 'cleansing [[petty bourgeoisie]] toxins,' the Party washed away morality, independence of thought, freedom of action, tolerance, and dignity. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
White privilege is a &amp;quot;petty bourgeoisie toxin&amp;quot; in socialist parlance. ''The Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party'' describes the process of rectification and its results:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;in evaluating their own consciousness, people were required to scrutinize whether they had been concerned about their self-interest, whether they had used work for the Party to reach personal goals, whether they had wavered in trust in the [[revolution]]ary future, whether they had feared death during battles, and whether they had missed spouses and family members after joining the Party or the army. There were no objective standards, so nearly everyone was found to have problems....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Humiliation became a fact of life—it was either humiliate other comrades or humiliate oneself. People were pushed to the brink of insanity, having been forced to abandon their dignity, sense of honor or shame, and love for one another to save their own lives and their own jobs. They ceased to express their own opinions and recited Party leaders’ articles instead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ninecommentaries.com/english-2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
This Maoist rectification was openly used against public officials and private citizens on the street during the [[2020 Leftist insurrection]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/eACIjK36mek&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Great Awokening===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Antifa riots|Woke}}&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Maoist]] rectification campaign erupted out of the Antifa riots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://justthenews.com/nation/culture/forced-apologies-and-public-shaming-doctrinal-deviation-sweep-american-culture&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Whites were asked, if not demanded, to kneel and publicly disavow their white privilege.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/06/03/brain-washed-whites-convulsing-from-white-guilt-make-pledge-of-allegiance-to-black-people-929304&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Calling police to report crimes or threats to life and safety was deemed &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/06/08/minn-official-tells-cnns-camerota-wanting-to-protect-your-home-comes-from-a-place-of-privilege-931770&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The mayor of Minneapolis was shamed before a leftist mob of mostly white people for not agreeing to disband the Minneapolis police.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/eACIjK36mek&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A ''New York Times'' columnist urged white people to text “relatives and loved ones telling them you will not be visiting them or answering phone calls until they take significant action in supporting black lives either through protest or financial contributions.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://summit.news/2020/06/09/new-york-times-columnist-demands-white-people-ditch-family-members-who-dont-support-black-lives-matter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[New Orleans Saints]] quarterback Drew Brees told an interviewer “I will never agree with anybody disrespecting the [[flag]] of the United States of America.”  Brees and his family received death threats. Brees publicly asked for &amp;quot;forgiveness&amp;quot; for saying Americans should respect the flag.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailywire.com/news/drew-brees-caves-asks-for-forgiveness-for-saying-americans-should-respect-the-flag?itm_source=parsely-api&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Even Brees wife wrote an apology: “WE ARE THE PROBLEM. I write this with tears in my eyes and I hope you all hear our hearts.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/06/07/drew-brees-wife-brittany-issues-apology-we-are-the-problem/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aleksandar Katai, a [[Serbia]]n soccer who played with the Los Angeles Galaxy, wife posted criticism of the Minneapolis rioters in Serbian. Someone noticed, translated the posting and criticized her. She deleted the posting. Katai's wife was in Chicago when she wrote the post, and Aleksandar may not have even been aware of the post. Riot protesters arrived at the Los Angeles stadium to call for Alexander's firing.  The management of the L.A. Galaxy forced Alexander Katai to apologize for his wife, and then to denounce her. Then they made him endorse Black Lives Matter, which he did, and then they fired him anyway.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://skugal.org/racist-violent-la-galaxy-fire-aleksandar-katai-over-wifes-shocking-social-media-posts-about-us-police-brutality-protests/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Then Katai was attacked on his way out for something he didn't do, may not have even been aware of, in a language most Americans don't understand.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2020/06/06/la-galaxy-releases-aleksandar-katai-amid-wifes-racist-posts/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Editorial page director of the ''[[New York Times]]'' James Bennet apologized, and then resigned, after publishing an [[op-ed]] from [[Sen. Tom Cotton]].   The article suggested the U.S. military might be necessary to quell nationwide socialist insurrection if governors and mayors refused to defend the lives and property of American citizens and taxpayers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Sacramento Kings]] play-by-play announcer Grant Napear resigned after the backlash from tweeting, “All lives matter.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Roseanne Barr]], a mere mortal was fired from [[ABC]] after apologizing for making what was alleged to be a racist comment; prominent [[leftist]] spokesperson and alleged [[comedian]] [[Jimmy Kimmel]] was retained by ABC after apologizing for a blatantly racist alleged comedy skit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2020 Leftist rectification campaign [[UCLA]] investigated a [[white]] professor who read [[Martin Luther King Jr.]]’s ''Letter from Birmingham Jail,'' which reportedly contains the N-word, to students in a [[political science]] class.  UCLA also held a town hall shaming and urged students to come forward with complaints.  The department head and other faculty charged,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;The lecturer also showed a portion of a documentary which included graphic images and descriptions of lynching, with a narrator who quoted the n-word in explaining the history of lynching. Many students expressed distress and anger regarding the lecture and the lecturer's response to their concerns during the lecture.  We share students' concerns that the lecturer did not simply pause and reassess their teaching pedagogy to meet the students' needs.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/professor-under-investigation-for-reading-mlks-letter-from-birmingham-jail-containing-n-word&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Intersectionality===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Intersectionality}}&lt;br /&gt;
Intersectionality is a form of left-wing [[identity politics]] and [[cultural Marxism]].  Intersectionality, so named because it relies on the intersection between race, class, sex, sexual preference, religion, gender identity, and a myriad of other irrelevant characteristics, is a bigoted ideology used by [[leftist]]s to make policy.  It is constantly pushed by university professors, &amp;quot;journalists,&amp;quot; and politicians, along with the rest of the [[establishment]].  One's level of oppression is determined by the number of oppressed groups they fall into, and/or where that group falls on the oppression hierarchy.  [[Islam]] is at the top, followed by the [[LGBT]] community, then &amp;quot;people of color,&amp;quot; then women, Jews, and WASPs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the most ridiculous examples of intersectionality include &amp;quot;Queers for Palestine,&amp;quot; the racist allegation that white people cause &amp;quot;climate change&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;Say Her Name,&amp;quot; a gynocentric offshoot of [[Black Lives Matter]], and the 2020 Democrats supporting free healthcare and abortion &amp;quot;rights&amp;quot; for illegal immigrants.  Accurate and positive examples of intersectionality include the connection between women's rights and gun rights, activists like Rev. Clenard Childress standing against the actual racism and &amp;quot;[[Black Genocide]]&amp;quot; of abortion provider and lobbying company [[Planned Parenthood]], and real feminist [[Malala Yousafzai]] fighting for women's education in Taliban-occupied Afghanistan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Socialist genocide denial===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Socialism denial|Cambodian genocide|Three Years of Disasters|Holodomor|The Black Book of Communism|Atheism and human rights violations}}&lt;br /&gt;
Every announced candidate for the Democrat nomination in the [[2020 Presidential election]] is a Socialist holocaust denier. Several Democrat presidential candidates have sparked a positive and enthusiastic response among [[white supremacist]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/02/david-duke-tulsi-gabbard/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thisisinsider.com/white-supremacists-are-disillusioned-by-trump-and-joining-the-yang-gang-2019-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  None have renounced [[violence]] as a means to obtain or retain political power.  This runs contrary to the [[Declaration of Independence]] which states that governments derive &amp;quot;their just powers from the consent of the governed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Racism and the Democratic Party}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''First Party System'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dem-leaders.jpg|right|450px|thumb|A contemporary watercolor of Democratic presidents. Clockwise from far left: Presidents Jimmy Carter, John Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Woodrow Wilson, Lyndon Johnson, Harry Truman, Andrew Jackson and Franklin Roosevelt. Jackson is considered the founder of the party. Jackson, who implemented the Indian Removal Act, is slated to have his picture removed from the $20 bill in 2026.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats claim that [[Thomas Jefferson]] founded their party in 1792 at the start of the [[First Party System]]. The [[Republicans (Jeffersonian)|Jeffersonian Republicans]] was a political party established under the leadership of Jefferson and [[James Madison]]. At the time, it was generally called the Republicans, but it had no relationship to today's Republican Party, founded in 1854. The 1816 election was the last occasion when the Federalist Party nominated a presidential candidate. In the 1820s, the Jeffersonian Republicans split into several fractions. [[Andrew Jackson]] emerged as the candidate of one of these groups and was elected president in 1828. Well into the 21st century, Jefferson and Jackson have been regularly honored by local Democrat parties with an annual Jefferson-Jackson fundraising dinner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/09/us/jefferson-jackson-dinner-will-be-renamed.html|title=Jefferson-Jackson Dinner Will Be Renamed|date=August 8, 2015|work=New York Times|accessdate=|first=Ashley|last=Southhall}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/2015/11/16/colorado-democratic-party-considers-renaming-annual-jefferson-jackson-dinner/123835/|title=Colorado Democrats consider renaming Jefferson Jackson dinner|work=The Denver Post|first=John|last= Frank|date=November 16, 2015|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2015/07/jefferson_jackson_renamed_loui.html|title=As state Democratic parties rename their Jefferson-Jackson dinners, will Louisiana change 'J-J?'|work=The Times Picayune|first=Kevin |last=Litten|date= July 23, 2015|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most historians regard Jackson's 1832 campaign organization as the beginning of today's Democratic Party. The Democratic Party itself traces its origin to Jefferson's Republicans and the Whisky Rebellion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;World Book&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The leadership of the Jeffersonian Republicans, including [[John Quincy Adams]] and [[Henry Clay]], created the National Republican Party. Adams supporters called themselves National Republicans, antecedents of the merchant class Whig and later the Republican parties.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;presidents&amp;quot;&amp;gt;William DeGregorio, ''The Complete Book of U.S. Presidents'', Gramercy 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Cons4 (2).jpg|left|300px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
The modern Democratic party was formed during 1828–34, under the national leadership of Jackson and Van Buren, with organizations in all the states comprised of local political leaders. This became the era of [[Jacksonian Democracy]].  The Jacksonians resembled the [[Jeffersonian Democracy|Jeffersonians]] especially in terms of anti-elite rhetoric of opposition to &amp;quot;aristocracy&amp;quot; (that is, wealthy old families), distrust of banks (and paper money), they were &amp;quot;yeoman farmers&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;hillbillies&amp;quot;, with faith in &amp;quot;the people.&amp;quot; By his extensive use of federal [[Spoils system|patronage]], President Jackson removed old office-holders to make way for party loyalists.  The U.S. Postal Service was the federal government's largest employer.  With the emergence of the merchant or middle class Whig Party, the nation now had a new party system, the [[Second Party System]], which lasted until 1854.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The party held its first national convention in 1832 to choose a new running mate for Jackson; it nominated Martin Van Buren for vice president and endorsed the reelection of Jackson. Jackson easily defeated Clay in 1832.  In the political realignment of 1828–32, some of Jackson's supporters from the election of 1828, especially businessmen and bankers, switched to the opposition Whig Party as Jackson crusaded against the [[Second Bank of the United States]].  The name &amp;quot;Democratic Party&amp;quot; became common by the mid-1830s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Jacksonian Democracy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[image:donk1837.jpg|thumb|1837 cartoon shows Democratic Party as donkey]]&lt;br /&gt;
The new party dominated the [[Second Party System]] (as political scientists call it; historians call it &amp;quot;Jacksonian Democracy&amp;quot;,  1832–54).  After 1832, the Democratic Party drew support from a cross-section of the country. The vast majority of rich merchants, bankers, and [[plantation]] owners were Whigs, as were most evangelical Protestants.  The party was strongest among traditionalistic farmers, frontiersmen, unskilled workers, Irish Catholics, and local or state political leaders. It was weakest in [[New England]], where industrialization turned most factory workers and white-collar workers into Whigs, but was dominant in all other regions.  The key issues it promoted were opposition to elites and aristocrats, popular democracy (in terms of voting rights and access to government patronage jobs) and opposition to the Bank of the United States (Jackson vetoed its charter renewal in 1832).  The policies were known as [[Jacksonian Democracy]]. [[Image:Jackson1832.jpg|thumb|300px|left]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Banking and tariffs were the central domestic policy issues from 1828 to 1852.  The Democrats favored the [[Mexican-American War]]; Whigs opposed it. Democrats attracted Catholic Irish and German immigrants and denounced anti-immigrant nativism. Both the Democrats and Whigs were divided on the issue of slavery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1830s the Loco-Focos in New York City were radically democratic, anti-monopoly, and proponents of [[laissez-faire]].  Their chief spokesman was writer [[William Leggett]]. At this time labor unions were few; some were loosely affiliated with the party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The economy went sour in the late 1830s with Van Buren getting the blame; he lost reelection as president in 1840 to the Whig [[William Henry Harrison]]. The Democrats gained the White House back in 1844 with [[James K. Polk]]. He had a successful term, then retired. The Democratic National Committee was created in 1848 at the convention that nominated General [[Lewis Cass]], who lost to General [[Zachary Taylor]] of the Whigs. In state after state, the Democrats gained small but permanent advantages over the Whigs, until by 1852 the Whig Party was fatally weakened by divisions regarding the issue of slavery and they soon vanished. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party dominated the North from the 1840s to 1854. Northern Democrats opposed banks, criticized corporate practices, and preached the ideals of a free society. They called for rapid territorial expansion of the United States, saying that in territorial expansion lay a means for thwarting the pretensions of the [[Slave Power]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Franklin Pierce]] of New Hampshire was elected president in 1852, followed by [[James Buchanan]] of Pennsylvania in 1856. They proved poor presidents who lost control of the slavery issue, and the party, as the nation broke apart and fought the [[American Civil War]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Racist and segregationist traditions====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also [[Trail of Tears]], [[genocide|Ethnic cleansing]] and [[Dred Scott decision]]''&lt;br /&gt;
The 21st Congress was controlled by the Jacksonian Democrats. The first major bill they passed was the [[Indian Removal Act]], authorizing the removal of the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminoles from the South, primarily Georgia and Florida, to a territory west of the Mississippi River which became [[Oklahoma]]. The bill was controversial, opposed by many Christians and Northerners. During the first stage of the Choctaws’ forced migration begun in 1831, thousands died during the journey. Each successive stage was marred by a lack of food, shelter, and protection from the elements. Diphtheria and typhoid were rampant. Over the decade, more than 46,000 Native Americans experienced these conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historian John Toland maintains that the [[Nazi Party]]'s segregation and deportation of [[Jew]]s into ghettos and concentration camps were derived from the Democratic Party's segregation and deportation of Native Americans to reservation land.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://jewishjournal.com/culture/food/182867/honoring-native-american-voices-recognizing-tragic-history-and-praising-brave-spirits/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Trail of Tears.png|right|350px|thumb|Andrew Jackson not only founded the Democratic Party, but he also founded the infamous Trail of Tears.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the 31st Congress, the Democrats had a majority in the Senate and a large plurality in the House, while the [[Free Soil Republican]]s held only 9 seats. The [[Whig]]s held the second largest contingent as well as the White House. Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which penalized local and state officials in free states who did not arrest an alleged runaway slave on demand of a slave owner. Any person aiding a runaway slave by providing food or shelter was subject to six months' imprisonment and a fine. Slave owners needed only to supply a sworn affidavit to a U.S. Marshal to capture an escaped slave. Since a suspected slave had no [[Jury trial|right to trial]], the law resulted in the kidnapping of free blacks by bounty hunters and conscription into slavery in both free states and slave states, as suspected fugitive slaves were denied the right to a legal defense. The law's passage ultimately led to the demise of the Whigs and rise of Free Soil-Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jackson had appointed his [[Attorney General]], [[Roger B. Taney]], to fill the seat of retiring Chief Justice [[John Marshall]]. In 1846, [[Dred Scott]], an African-American slave living in Missouri, filed suit against his master for his own freedom. Scott argued that he had legally gained freedom in the 1830s, when he had resided with a previous master in the free state of Illinois and a portion of the Louisiana Territory where slavery was banned. After a series of legal battles lasting over a decade, the case made its way to the Supreme Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrat President [[James Buchanan]] said in his inaugural address that the issue of slavery would soon be &amp;quot;finally settled&amp;quot; by the Supreme Court.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Simon (2006), pp. 117–120&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Taney sought to permanently remove slavery as a subject of national debate. All the Democratic appointees on the Court were outraged over what they saw as &amp;quot;Northern aggression&amp;quot; towards slavery, an institution they believed was critical to &amp;quot;Southern life and values.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McPherson171174&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the Dred Scott decision of 1857, the Taney Court ruled that persons of African descent could not be, nor were ever intended to be, citizens under the U.S. Constitution. Taney wrote that the framers of the Constitution believed that blacks “had no rights which the white man was bound to respect;&amp;quot; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. The court also declared the [[Missouri Compromise]] unconstitutional (the Missouri Compromise of 1819 allowed for admission of new states to the Union on a one-for-one basis, one free state for every one slave state), thus permitting slavery in all territories of the westward expansion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Dred Scott'' decision received strong criticism and bolstered the growing popularity of the [[Republican Party]]. Republicans rejected Taney's legal reasoning and argued that the [[Declaration of Independence]] showed that the [[Founding Fathers]] favored the protection of individual rights for all free men, regardless of race.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Simon (2006), pp. 138–139&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many Republicans accused Taney of being part of a conspiracy to legalize slavery throughout the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Simon (2006), pp. 155–156&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Civil War and aftermath===&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[Third Party System]] (1854-1896) the Democrats became the minority in the face of the newly formed Republican Party (formed by former Whigs and Free Soil [[abolition]]ists), which controlled nearly all northern states by 1860, bringing a solid majority in the Electoral College.  A powerful Republican issue was the allegation that northern Democrats, including &amp;quot;Doughfaces&amp;quot; like Pierce and Buchanan, and advocates of [[popular sovereignty]] like [[Stephen A. Douglas]] and [[Lewis Cass]], were accomplices to the [[Slave Power]]. The Republicans meant by Slave Power the conspiracy of slaveholders to seize control of the federal government and block the &amp;quot;progress of liberty.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:371px-Scourged back by McPherson &amp;amp; Oliver, 1863, colourised.jpg|left|275px|thumb|''Another definition of [[Progressive|Progressivism]]:'' Prior to the end of slavery and suppressing the vote for 100 years, then later keeping Blacks dependent on [[entitlement]]s, Democrats used the whip to keep Blacks in line.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Party was beginning a 50-year era of dominance (1858-1910). During the war, Northern Democrats divided into two factions, [[War Democrats]], who supported the military policies of President Lincoln, and [[Copperheads]], who strongly opposed them. Historian Kenneth Stampp has captured the Copperhead spirit in his depiction of Democratic Congressman Daniel W. Voorhees of Indiana: &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|There was an earthy quality in Voorhees, &amp;quot;the tall sycamore of the Wabash.&amp;quot; On the stump his hot temper, passionate [[partisan]]ship, and stirring eloquence made an irresistible appeal to the western Democracy. His bitter cries against [[Protectionism|protective]] [[tariff]]s and national banks, his intense [[race prejudice]], his suspicion of the eastern Yankee, his devotion to personal liberty, his defense of the Constitution and state rights faithfully reflected the views of his constituents. Like other Jacksonian agrarians he resented the political and economic revolution then in progress. Voorhees idealized a way of life which he thought was being destroyed by the current rulers of his country. His bold protests against these dangerous trends made him the idol of the Democracy of the Wabash Valley.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Stampp, 211.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1860 the Democrats were unable to stop the election of Republican [[Abraham Lincoln]], even as they feared his election would lead to civil war.  The party was divided between North and South.  The northern wing nominated Douglas, and the southern wing nominated Vice President [[John C. Breckinridge]]. Douglas campaigned across the country and came in second in the popular vote, but carried only Missouri. Breckinridge carried 11 slave states. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The heart of Democrat Resistance in the North resided in New York. The New York City draft riots (July 13–16, 1863) were the largest civil and racially-charged insurrection in American history, aside from the [[American Civil War|Civil War]] itself. Initially intended as a protest against the draft, it turned into a race riot. Workers feared free black people would compete for jobs. Black people throughout the city were attacked. 120 people were killed, public buildings, churches, homes of various abolitionists or sympathizers, and many black homes were ransacked or destroyed. The Colored Orphan Asylum was burnt to the ground.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only a fraction of Union troops occupied the South after the war, and the balance mustered out according to length of service. Because blacks were not admitted into ranks until the middle of the war, they were retained at a higher rate, making the occupying force &amp;quot;blacker&amp;quot; than the one that won the war. The roughly 200,000 black Americans who served in the Union Army comprised an estimated 10 percent of the North's total fighting force. But by the last quarter of 1865, blacks made up about one-third of the occupation army. Many Southerners took this as a deliberate Republican insult.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://slate.com/human-interest/2018/02/what-reconstruction-and-its-end-meant-for-black-americans-who-had-fought-for-the-right-to-keep-and-bear-arms.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats lost consecutive presidential elections from 1860 through 1880 (but 1876 was in dispute); 1884 was their next victory. The Democrats were weakened by &amp;quot;The Cause&amp;quot; in the Civil War but benefited from resentment toward Republicans for its effort to promote equality for blacks in Reconstruction. The Republicans received the eternal hatred and hostility of Democrats, and shied away from social issues for the next 150 years, focusing instead on its original purpose of preserving the Union through national security, and on economic issues. The [[Redeemers]] gave the Democrats control of every Southern state. [[Ku Klux Klan|Democratic terrorism]] at first was focused on Republicans; once the Republicans had been chased out, the [[lynching]] of Blacks peaked about 1892 with over 150 victims, or about one every two days.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Across [[the South]] Republican parties were formed by African Americans. Black people were the original Republicans in the South. &lt;br /&gt;
The Republican Party in [[Texas]] was founded on the 4th of July 1867 in [[Houston, Texas]] by 150 African Americans and 20 whites.  Two of the first three statewide Republican chairman were African American.  The first 42 Black legislators elected in Texas were all Republican. &lt;br /&gt;
The first 112 Black legislators elected in [[Mississippi]] were all Republican. The first 190 Black legislators elected in [[South Carolina]] were all Republicans. The first 41 Black legislators in [[Georgia]] were Republicans.  The first 127 Black legislators in [[Louisiana]] were Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Birth of the Klan====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Kkk-carpetbagger-cartoon.jpg|right|300px|thumb|A cartoon threatening that the that Democrat donkey and KKK will [[lynch]] scalawags (left) and [[carpetbagger]]s (right) on March 4, 1869, the day President Grant takes office. Tuscaloosa, Alabama, Independent Monitor, September 1, 1868. A full-scale scholarly history analyzes the cartoonː Guy W. Hubbs, Searching for Freedom after the Civil War: Klansman, Carpetbagger, Scalawag, and Freedman (2015).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hubbs, Guy W. (May 15, 2015). [https://books.google.com/books?id=KIVoCQAAQBAJ&amp;amp;source=gbs_navlinks_s &amp;quot;Searching for Freedom after the Civil War: Klansman, Carpetbagger, Scalawag, and Freedman&amp;quot;]. University Alabama Press.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Reconstruction}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 1866 [[Democrat]]s formed the [[Ku Klux Klan]]. Its purpose was to take control and return Democrats to power.  The Ku Klux Klan started attacking Black Republican conventions.   At the Republican convention in Louisiana, the Klan joined with [[New Orleans]] police and New Orleans' Democrat mayor. The New Orleans Republican convention was attacked.  40 Blacks and 20 whites were killed. Another 150 were wounded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1868 the Democrats put out push cards in South Carolina listing what they called the 'radical' members of the South Carolina legislature.  A push card is about the size of a baseball card.  The cards had the pictures of 63 legislators they wanted to kill.  50 of the legislators were Black and 13 were white.  All 63 were Republicans.  On the back of the was the name of the legislator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1872 Congress held hearings on the Klan.  Democrat leaders from Democrat States admitted under oath unequivocally that the Klan belonged to the Democrat party and their propose was to restore control in Southern states to the Democratic party.  The Congressional Hearings make up 13 volumes.  Black congressmen John Roy Lynch and Richard Cain went to Congress armed for fear of Klan attacks.  Blacks testified that they instructed by the Klan and Democrats that, if they would stop voting the Republican ticket and would agree to vote the straight Democrat ticket, all the violence against Blacks would stop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jim Crow and the disenfranchisement of black voters in most of the South took place 1890–1900. From 1880 to 1960 the &amp;quot;[[Solid South]]&amp;quot; voted Democratic in all presidential elections (except 1928). After 1900 the key election in southern states were white-only caucuses;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The system remained in place until the [[McGovern-Fraser Commission]], which unseated white big city Democrat bosses at the national convention.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; victory in that primary was &amp;quot;tantamount to election.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
GAR veteran 2nd Lieut. Nathaniel Grigsby of Company G, 10th Indiana Cavalry died at the age of 79 in 1890. Grigsby's brother was married to Abraham's Lincoln's sister. Grigsby had this written on his tombstone: {{quotebox|Through this inscription I wish to enter my dying protest against what is called the Democratic party. I have watched it closely since the days of Jackson and know that all the misfortunes of our nation has come to it through this so called party. Therefore beware of this party of [[treason]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/grave-statement-2/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Republicans continued to control the White House until 1912 (except 1884 and 1892), the Democrats remained competitive in the states, especially in the mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest, and controlled the House of Representatives for most of that period. In the election of 1884, [[Grover Cleveland]], the conservative Democratic Governor of New York, won the presidency, a feat he repeated in 1892, having lost in the election of 1888.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Civil service replaces Reconstruction and the spoils system====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lynch.jpg|thumb|450px|The first victims (yellow line) were Republican [[carpetbagger]]s; once they were driven out the Democrats turned on Blacks (blue line).&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Source: Historical Statistics of the U.S., and is based on the 1952 Negro year Book.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Civil service system}}&lt;br /&gt;
While the Democratic party lost the Civil War, it won the battle to control the United States Civil Service [[bureaucracy]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/05/21/trump-vs-the-deep-state Trump vs the Deep State], Evan Osnos, ''[[The New Yorker]]'', May 14, 2018&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Since the end of Reconstruction in 1876 and passage of the 1882 Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act, the Democratic party is no longer dependent on the spoils system and winning elections to maintain its power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the defeat of the Democrats and the South, to the victors went the spoils.  Republicans immediately stripped [[white]] [[male]]s who engaged in rebellion against the [[United States]] of the [[vote]], and gave it to Blacks. Newly freed Blacks held local, state and federal elected and non-elected positions as Republicans. The white males who were deprived of the vote were also barred from holding any civil service position and were universally Democrats.  This disenfranchisement created enormous resentment among Democrats, so they formed the [[Ku Klux Klan]] to engage in voter intimidation and suppression. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1876, the situation had become ungovernable for Republicans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;&amp;quot;the Compromise of 1877, which resolved the disputed presidential election of 1876 by awarding the presidency to Republican Rutherford B. Hayes (who had lost the popular vote) in exchange for the removal of federal troops from the South after the Civil War (which benefitted Democrats, who wished to end Reconstruction and return white supremacy to southern state governments).&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; [https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/the-gilded-age/gilded-age/a/gilded-age-politics-patronage Gilded Age politics: patronage]. khanacademy.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Republicans had been able to pass the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments which guaranteed Blacks basic equality and civil rights, but eventually had to declare an amnesty for whites who engaged in rebellion. Reconstruction ended, and Republicans withdrew from [[social engineering]] which had divided the country so deeply and stirred up such bitterness and hatred among Democrats toward both Blacks and Republicans. Reconstruction earned Republicans the undying [[hatred]] of Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See for example [https://youtu.be/-yY7g2jOquM James O'Keefe debate with Hairy Hillbilly Hippie] for an example of a partisan Democrat who votes against his own economic interests.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See excerpt from [[Dinesh D'Souza]]'s, ''[https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/dinesh-dsouza-the-secret-history-of-the-democratic-party Hillary's America: The Secret History of the Democratic Party]'', Regnery Publishing, July 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
African Americans in the South were left to the mercy of increasingly hostile state governments dominated by white Democratic legislatures; neither the legislatures, law enforcement or the courts worked to protect freedmen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Encyclopedia of American Civil Liberties|author=Finkelman, Paul|year=2006}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As [[Democrats]] regained power in the late 1870s, they struggled to suppress black voting through intimidation and fraud at the polls. [[Paramilitary]] groups such as the [[Red Shirts]] acted on behalf of the Democrats to suppress black voting. From 1890 to 1908, 10 of the 11 former Confederate states passed disfranchising constitutions or amendments,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=Democracy's Privileged Few|author=Chafetz, Joshua Aaron|year=2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with provisions for [[poll tax]]es,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Klarman, Michael J. 2004&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|title=From Jim Crow to Civil Rights|author=Klarman, Michael J.|year=2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; residency requirements, [[literacy test]]s,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Klarman, Michael J. 2004&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; and [[grandfather clause]]s that effectively disfranchised most black voters and many poor white people. The disfranchisement also meant that black people could not serve on juries or hold any political office, which were restricted to voters; those who could not vote were excluded from the political system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cleveland was the leader of the [[Bourbon Democrats]], the [[bourgeois]] wing of the party.  They represented business [[elitism|elites]], supported banking and railroad goals, promoted capitalism, opposed the annexation of [[Hawaii]], fought for the [[gold standard]], and opposed [[Bimetallism]].  They strongly supported ending Republican spoils with the [[Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act|Civil Service Reform Act]] and opposed corruption of city bosses, leading the fight against the Tweed Ring.  The leading Bourbons included [[Samuel J. Tilden]], David Bennett Hill and William C. Whitney of New York, Arthur Pue Gorman of Maryland, Thomas F. Bayard of Delaware, William L. Wilson of West Virginia, [[John Griffin Carlisle]] of Kentucky, William F. Vilas of Wisconsin, J. Sterling Morton of Nebraska, John M. Palmer of Illinois, Horace Boies of Iowa, L.Q.C. Lamar of Mississippi, and railroad builder James J. Hill of Minnesota. A prominent intellectual was pro-segregationist  [[Woodrow Wilson]]. The Bourbons were in power when the [[Panic of 1893]] hit; it was a deep depression and they took the blame.  A fierce struggle inside the party ensued, with catastrophic losses for both the Bourbon and agrarian factions in 1894, leading to the showdown in 1896.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bryan and anti-Semitism===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Grover Cleveland]] led the [[bourgeois]] [[Bourbon Democrat]]s but as the [[Panic of 1893|depression of 1893]] deepened his enemies multiplied. The Panic of 1893 started in February 1893, a full month before Cleveland became president. Convinced that the Sherman Silver Purchase Act, passed under the administration of [[Benjamin Harrison]], was largely responsible for the alarming drain on federal gold, President Cleveland called Congress into special session to urge its repeal. Congress consented, but only after bitter debate that divided the Democratic party into two hostile camps-the eastern &amp;quot;goldbugs&amp;quot; and the silver wing of the West and South that was to propel young [[William Jennings Bryan]] to the fore in 1896.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;presidents&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Dead-dem1880.jpg|thumb|425px|right|In 1880 when General Hancock (right) became the presidential nominee of the Democrats, Republican cartoonists showed the Democratic party history as a horror chamber featuring atrocities in the Civil War era; the donkey&amp;quot; shows the party as a coalition of the rear end of the South joined to the rear end of the North]]&lt;br /&gt;
At the 1896 convention, the silverite-agrarian faction repudiated the president and nominated the crusading orator [[William Jennings Bryan]] on a platform of inflation through &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; silver. The idea was that minting huge numbers of silver dollars would flood the economy with cash and end the depression.  Eastern Democrats, unable to accept the party's free-silver platform and unwilling to support McKinley for his tariff views, nominated their own candidate, John M. Palmer of Illinois and called themselves the National, or Gold, Democrats.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;presidents&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The [[Gold Democrats]] attracted prominent figure such as segregationist [[Woodrow Wilson]] and historian [[Frederick Jackson Turner]] , known for ignoring the contributions of minorities and who refused to vote Republican. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bryan became an overnight sensation among Democrats with his &amp;quot;Cross of Gold&amp;quot; speech: {{Cquote|&amp;quot;You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns. You shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQQ0AjqzFxQ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} Implicit was his assertion that the religious group responsible for the death of Christ was also the source of the United States’ economic woes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=mJLHrb-o5E0C&amp;amp;pg=PA50&amp;amp;lpg=PA50&amp;amp;dq=You+shall+not+press+down+upon+the+brow+of+labor+this+crown+of+thorns,+you+shall+not+crucify+mankind+upon+a+cross+of+gold.%27%27+The+antisemitism+evoked+by&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=fp9QYcxY3W&amp;amp;sig=ACfU3U3zQFaSOMeeKxu8DlnOdXz5RdWb7A&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwjyyr_4tYfgAhXL5YMKHQ5_DKgQ6AEwDnoECAIQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=You%20shall%20not%20press%20down%20upon%20the%20brow%20of%20labor%20this%20crown%20of%20thorns%2C%20you%20shall%20not%20crucify%20mankind%20upon%20a%20cross%20of%20gold.''%20The%20antisemitism%20evoked%20by&amp;amp;f=false Antisemitism in America], Leonard Dinnerstein, Oxford University Press, Nov 2, 1995, p. 50.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Crisscrossing the Midwest and East by special train, he gave over 500 speeches to audiences in the millions.  In St. Louis he gave 36 speeches to workingmen's audiences all over the city, all in one day.  Most Democratic newspapers were hostile (except [[William Randolph Hearst]]'s ''New York Journal'') but Bryan seized control of the media by making the news every day, as he hurled thunderbolts against &amp;quot;Eastern monied interests,&amp;quot; a codeword for &amp;quot;Jewish bankers.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/jdickerson/status/788461796772446208&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Using [[fraud]] and [[violence]], and rallying support by appealing to white supremacy, the Democrats held on to their power in Southern states. Many Democrats refused to endanger [[white supremacy]] by voting against the Democratic Party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories_org_populist.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ethnic Democrats, (especially Germans and Irish), however, were alarmed and frightened by Bryan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://books.google.com/books?id=XpCgCNZwpvoC&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The middle classes, businessmen, newspaper editors, factory workers, railroad workers, and prosperous farmers generally rejected Bryan's crusade. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bryan was overwhelmed by [[William McKinley]] in the most exciting race in national history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Refuting Bryan's charges, historians have discovered there was little coercion of workers.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McKinley promised a return to prosperity based on the gold standard, support for industry, railroads and banks, and pluralism that would enable every group to move ahead. Bryan did, however, win the hearts and minds of a majority of Democrats. The election of 1896 was a political realignment. The victory of the Republican Party marked the start of the &amp;quot;Progressive Era,&amp;quot; from 1896 to 1932, in which the GOP usually was dominant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wilson and the KKK===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Plessy v. Ferguson}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Melville Fuller]] was appointed Chief Justice by President [[Grover Cleveland]] in 1888. Fuller managed Democrat [[Stephen A. Douglas]]'s campaign in the [[1860 presidential election]] against Abraham Lincoln. He was known as a Copperhead Democrat. In 1896, a Fuller Court decision declared that racial segregation does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment so long as the &amp;quot;separate but equal&amp;quot; doctrine is followed. The decision allowed the continued existence of Jim Crow laws for another six decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Fourth Party System]] began with the 1896 election, a realignment during which the GOP controlled the presidency for 28 of 36 years. The GOP dominated most of the Northeast and Midwest, and half the West. Veterans of the Grand Army of the Republic, or GAR, became the GOP. One of the consequences of the Democratic victories in the South was that many Southern Congressmen and Senators were almost automatically re-elected every election. Due to the importance of seniority in the U.S. Senate, Southerners were able to control most of the committees and kill any civil rights legislation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thirteen.org/wnet/jimcrow/stories_org_democratic.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[William Jennings Bryan]], with a base in the South and Plains states, was strong enough to get the nomination again in 1900 (losing to McKinley) and 1908 (losing to Taft).  [[Theodore Roosevelt]] dominated the first decade of the century—and to the annoyance of Democrats &amp;quot;stole&amp;quot; the trust issue by crusading against trusts. &lt;br /&gt;
When [[Booker T. Washington]]'s autobiography, ''Up From Slavery'', was published in 1901, it became a bestseller and had a major impact on the African American community, and its friends and allies. Washington in 1901 was the first African-American ever invited to the White House as the guest of President Theodore Roosevelt &amp;amp;ndash; white Democrats complained loudly, although Washington remained as an advisor to Roosevelt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Larry Schweikart and Michael Allen, &amp;quot;A Patriot's History of the United States&amp;quot; (2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anti-Bryan conservatives controlled the convention in 1904, but they faced a [[Theodore Roosevelt]] landslide.  Bryan dropped his free silver and anti-[[imperialism]] rhetoric and supported mainstream [[progressive]] issues, such as the income tax, anti-trust, and direct election of Senators. He backed Woodrow Wilson in 1912, was rewarded with the State Department, then resigned in protest against Wilson's non-pacifistic policies in 1916. Northern Democrats were progressive on most issues, but generally opposed prohibition, were lukewarm regarding [[women's rights]], and were reluctant to undercut the &amp;quot;boss system&amp;quot; in the big cities. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:320px-Birth of a Nation theatrical poster.jpg|left|200px|thumb|'''Birth of a Nation''' released in 1915 depicted the history of the Democratic Party after the Civil War. In 1992, the [[Library of Congress]] deemed the film &amp;quot;culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant&amp;quot; and selected it for preservation in the National Film Registry.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Taking advantage of a deep split in the GOP, the Democrats took control of the House in 1910 and elected the Northern segregationist Woodrow Wilson as president in 1912 and 1916. In his first year in office, Wilson permitted his Treasury and the Post Office to begin efforts to [[segregate]] the federal workforce, particularly in the Columbia District. It was often carried out surreptitiously. Yet Wilson condoned it and tried to duck its implications in a manner we would describe today as slimy.  Wilson ordered [[Jim Crow]] segregation in all federal government facilities in Washington DC, wiping out 50 years of social progress that African-Americans made under Republicans. No longer could blacks and whites work together in government offices, eat in the same cafeterias, our use the same bathrooms. The Wilson administration went a step further. Through the Treasury Department's Office of the Architect, the bureau charged with construction and maintenance of federal buildings, federal buildings throughout the nation were ordered to furnish segregated bathrooms, even in Northern states were practices as such were virtually unknown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''American Nightmare: The History of Jim Crow'', Jerrold M. Packard, St. Martin's Press, 2003, pp. 124-125&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson also curtailed minority appointments to executive, diplomatic, and judicial positions.  Those latter numbers weren’t large — about 30 — but they were posts traditionally reserved for black Americans. The signal was terrible, even if it’s unclear that those black appointments would have met approval from a Senate controlled by Southern Democrats. Estimates reckon that between 15,000 and 20,000 black civil service employees, 6% of the federal workforce, were impacted by the administration’s actions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nysun.com/national/princetons-purge-of-wilson-follows-a-change/91174/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Wilson successfully led Congress to a series of [[Progressive]] laws, including a reduced tariff, stronger antitrust laws, the [[Federal Reserve System]], hours-and-pay benefits for railroad workers, and outlawing of child labor, raising wages for adults. Furthermore, constitutional amendments for prohibition and woman suffrage were passed in his second term.  In effect, Wilson laid to rest the issues of tariffs, money and antitrust that had dominated politics for 40 years.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 1915 the epic [[Hollywood]] film, ''Birth of a Nation'' was released with its portrayal of black men, many played by white actors in blackface, as unintelligent and sexually aggressive towards white women, and the portrayal of the [[Ku Klux Klan]] (KKK) as an heroic force.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.moviejustice.com/vault/index.php?p=getitem&amp;amp;db_id=4&amp;amp;item_id=27 MJ Movie Reviews – Birth of a Nation, The (1915) by Dan DeVore]  {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090707194449/http://www.moviejustice.com/vault/index.php?p=getitem&amp;amp;db_id=4&amp;amp;item_id=27 |date=July 7, 2009 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://themovingarts.com/revered-and-reviled-d-w-griffiths-the-birth-of-a-nation/|first=Eric M.|last=Armstrong|title=Revered and Reviled: D.W. Griffith's 'The Birth of a Nation'|work=The Moving Arts Film Journal|date=February 26, 2010|accessdate=|deadurl=yes|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20100529224316/http://themovingarts.com/revered-and-reviled-d-w-griffiths-the-birth-of-a-nation/|archivedate=2019-01-31|df=mdy-all}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was the first American motion picture to be screened inside the [[White House]], viewed there by President [[Woodrow Wilson]], members of his cabinet, and their families.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{harvnb|Stokes|2007|p=[https://books.google.com/books?id=fGJFpiTjbKwC&amp;amp;pg=PA111&amp;amp;lpg=PA111&amp;amp;dq=%22operators+wearing+full+evening+dress+utilized%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=AOFjf60Rc_&amp;amp;sig=GJ-f9FVH8MfOtgnzIJLQV_3l-DU&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=_m5hUMf9JI-whAfz6oCQAg&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22operators%20wearing%20full%20evening%20dress%20utilized%22&amp;amp;f=false 111]}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In a letter to the White House press secretary the author of ''The Clansman: A Historical Romance of the Ku Klux Klan'' which the film is based,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Franklin pages 417-434&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Franklin, John Hope &amp;quot;''The Birth of a Nation'': Propaganda as History&amp;quot; pages 417–434 from ''The Massachusetts Review'' Volume 20, No. 3, Autumn 1979 page 421.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; wrote: {{cquote|&amp;quot;The real purpose of my film was to revolutionize Northern sentiments by a presentation of history that would transform every man in the audience into a good Democrat...Every man who comes out of the theater is a Southern partisan for life!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Franklin_430&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Franklin, John Hope &amp;quot;''The Birth of a Nation'': Propaganda as History&amp;quot; pages 417–434 from ''The Massachusetts Review'' Volume 20, No. 3, Autumn 1979 page 430.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} In a letter to President Wilson, Thomas Dixon Jr., who authored the book and screenplay, boasted: {{cquote|&amp;quot;This play is transforming the entire population of the North and the West into sympathetic Southern voters. There will never be an issue of your segregation policy&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Franklin_430&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1924 DNC convention.jpg|right|300px|thumb|1924 Democratic Convention.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Dixon was alluding to the fact that Wilson upon becoming president in 1913 had imposed segregation on federal workplaces in Washington D.C. while reducing the number of black employees through demotion or dismissal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yellin, Eric S. (2013). ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=Mx-NiOJ3n-AC&amp;amp;pg=PA127&amp;amp;lpg=PA127 Racism in the Nation's Service: Government Workers and the Color Line in Woodrow Wilson's America] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180207065000/https://books.google.com/books?id=Mx-NiOJ3n-AC&amp;amp;pg=PA127&amp;amp;lpg=PA127 |date=February 7, 2018 }}''. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina. p. 127. {{ISBN|9781469607207}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wilson was re-elected in 1916 on the slogan, &amp;quot;He kept us out of war!&amp;quot;, the caldron that was inflaming Europe since 1914. Upon inauguration, Wilson promptly took the United States to war to save [[British]] [[Imperialism]]. Great Britain had been the United States principal foreign enemy since its founding, in the [[Revolutionary War]] and [[War of 1812]]; the Confederacy could not have fought without the assistance of British arms. Many Americans could not understand how the United States could come to the aid of Great Britain, which had tried to destroy the Union three times since its inception.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[World War I]] left the U.S. with a staggering [[national debt]]. Wilson turned his attention to building trade alliances and foreign affairs. He wrote parts of the [[Versailles Treaty]], especially the new [[League of Nations]]. But in 1919 Wilson's political skills faltered, and suddenly everything turned sour.  The Senate rejected Versailles and the League, a nationwide wave of strikes and violence caused unrest, and Wilson's health collapsed. With the rise of the leftist [[Soviet Union]] and [[Communist International]] [[conspiracy]], the world had not been made safe for democracy. The GOP came roaring back in a landslide in 1920, as [[Warren G. Harding]] defeated a Democratic ticket memorable for having [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] as the vice presidential nominee. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====1924 Klanbake====&lt;br /&gt;
At the 1924 Democratic National Convention, the big fight was over a resolution denouncing by name the [[Ku Klux Klan]]; it was pushed by New York governor [[Al Smith]] and Alabama Senator Oscar W. Underwood in order to embarrass the front-runner, William McAdoo of California. After furious debate, the resolution failed by a vote of 542.85 in favor to 546.15 opposed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://armored-column.com/the-democratic-klanbake-1924/ Democratic &amp;quot;Klanbake&amp;quot; Convention]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The soaring temperatures gave the Convention the name, the Klanbake. At its peak in the mid-1920s, the KKK claimed to include about 15% of the nation's eligible voters, approximately 4–5 million people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-2730 |title=Ku Klux Klan in the Twentieth Century |author=Lay, Shawn |website=New Georgia Encyclopedia |publisher=Coker College }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Klan split in the party over cultural issues, especially [[Prohibition]], facilitated Republican landslides in 1920, 1924 and 1928.  However [[Al Smith]] did build a strong Catholic base in the big cities in 1928, and [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]]'s election as Governor of New York that year brought a new leader to center stage.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== New Deal coalition of liberals and segregationists ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Economic planning}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[stock market crash of 1929]] and the ensuing [[Great Depression]] set the stage for a more progressive government and [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] won a landslide victory in the [[United States presidential election, 1932|election of 1932]], campaigning on a platform of &amp;quot;Relief, Recovery, and Reform.&amp;quot; This came to be termed &amp;quot;[[New Deal|The New Deal]]&amp;quot; after a phrase in his acceptance speech. The Democrats also swept to large majorities in both houses of Congress, and among state Governors. Roosevelt altered the nature of the Party, away from laissez-faire capitalism, and towards the [[administrative state]] and [[entitlement]]s.  Conservative Democrats were outraged; led by [[Al Smith]] they formed the [[American Liberty League]] in 1934 and counterattacked. They failed and either retired from politics or joined the GOP.  A few of them, such as [[Dean Acheson]] found their way back to the Democratic Party.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Students pledging allegiance to the American flag with the Bellamy salute.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Elementary school children giving the fascist salute while reciting the [[Pledge of Allegiance]] during the New Deal.]]&lt;br /&gt;
After making gains in Congress in 1934 Roosevelt moved left and embarked on a big spending program called &amp;quot;The Second New Deal.&amp;quot;  It was characterized by building a voting bloc of labor unions, nationalizing welfare by the [[WPA]] (with 2 million  unemployed men), setting up [[Social Security]] and raising taxes on &amp;quot;economic royalists.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt's [[New Deal]] created an Alphabet soup of government programs. They imposed strong regulations on the banking and financial system, transportation, communications, stock markets, labor-management relations and housing. The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) imposed restrictive covenants on mortgage underwriters to discourage government-backed home loans in areas &amp;quot;infiltrated&amp;quot; by &amp;quot;inharmonious racial or nationality groups.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-new-deal-as-raw-deal-for-blacks-in-segregated-communities/2017/05/25/07416bba-080a-11e7-a15f-a58d4a988474_story.html The New Deal as raw deal for blacks in segregated communities],  Charles Lane, ''[[Washington Post]]'', May 25, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Restrictive covenants were legal documents to ensure that blacks could not buy homes in white neighborhoods. These covenants forbade the owners and their heirs from selling their property to blacks and other racial and ethnic minorities. Because of these covenants, if the owners sold to a minority, the neighborhood property association had the right to sue in court to ensure that property and homes did not change hands and became the property of minorities. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roosevelt built up the &amp;quot;[[New Deal Coalition]]&amp;quot;, a diverse coalition of voters and special interest groups often with conflicting interests.  Key components included corrupt big city political machines and labor unions. Key voter groups included traditional white segregationists,  Southerners, Catholics, Jews, and liberals, as well as some Northern blacks. Southern New Dealers did not allow Blacks to vote. The big-city machines, largely controlled by immigrant leaders and unions, as well as blacks, were all tied to the party whose existence was maintained by a venomously, anti-Catholic, anti-labor and racist power center - the Southern Bourbon Democrats.  The other keystone of the alliance was the [[Communist Party]] and other leftists, who played a crucial role in allying with Roosevelt and the Democrats to ensure that workers did not transcend trade unionism into political action independent of the Democratic Party. This voter base allowed Democrats to be elected to Congress and the presidency for much of the next 30 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After a sweeping landslide reelection in 1936—losing only Maine and Vermont—Roosevelt stunned the nation, and his party, by calling for legislation to enlarge the Supreme Court by five new members after the court found illegal and unconstitutional many of Roosevelt's first term programs. A firestorm of opposition erupted, led by his own vice president [[John Nance Garner]]. Roosevelt was defeated by an alliance of Republicans and conservative Democrats, who formed a coalition that managed to block nearly all socialist planning. (Only a minimum wage law got through.) Angry with dissenters in his own party, Roosevelt tried to destroy them. In 1938, he actively campaigned against five incumbent conservative Democratic senators; all five senators won re-election.  In 1940, after rejecting DNC chair James Farley as his successor because Farley was [[Catholic]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Flynn, ''The Roosevelt Myth'', 1948, p. 179.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt broke with tradition and sought a third term as President. The decision was controversial - Democrat Governor [[Strom Thurmond]] supported his third term while his own vice president John Nance Garner quit over the matter while.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.americanheritage.com/content/what-trent-meant&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:LynchinginAmerica-6ngpoajqm9pq7z40qd21q4ejl9fx6zrggi1pq7r5bic.png|right|300px|thumb|FDR's Southern Strategy: FDR always opposed federal anti-lynching legislation, first introduced by Republicans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/12/07/is-it-time-for-progressives-to-stop-venerating-fdr/?utm_term=.2b894a27cc04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]] &lt;br /&gt;
On the eve of [[World War II]], Roosevelt appointed [[Joseph P. Kennedy]], father of John Kennedy, [[Bobby Kennedy]], and [[Ted Kennedy]] as Ambassador to [[Great Britain]]. Joe Kennedy was a notorious [[anti-Semite]] and [[Nazi]] sympathizer. At the time of the [[Kristallnacht]], the ''New York Times'' reported Kennedy had a solution to the problems of German Jews: ship them all to [[Africa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/joe-kennedys-answer-to-the-jewish-question-ship-them-to-africa?ref=home?ref=home&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====FDR's Southern Strategy====&lt;br /&gt;
To win election, FDR forged a coalition of Northern Democrats and Southern segregationists by placing [[John Nance Garner]] of Texas on the ticket as his running mate. The Democrats won an overwhelming majority in the House, picked up 97 seats, bringing the total to 313. On the Republican side the first African-American in the 20th century, and the first since Reconstruction, Rep. Oscar De Priest was re-elected. The Democratic chairman of the new Congress' Committee on Accounts, Rep. Lindsay Warren, ordered a De Priest staffer and his son to be thrown out of the House's whites-only cafeteria. There was a separate facility for blacks in the basement. De Priest introduced a resolution calling for an investigation. On the House floor, De Priest refuted Warren's claim that African-Americans had always been banned from the restaurant, recalling that he and other black patrons had frequented the House cafeteria. De Priest implored his colleagues to support the resolution, remarking, {{quotebox|“If we allow segregation and the denial of constitutional rights under the Dome of the Capitol, where in God’s name will we get them? If we allow this challenge to go without correcting it, it will set an example where people will say Congress itself approves of segregation.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://history.house.gov/People/Listing/D/DE-PRIEST,-Oscar-Stanton-(D000263)/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
The effort to desegregate the Democrat-controlled House cafeteria was defeated. Civil rights were not on the party agenda. FDR always opposed the federal anti-lynching law as part of FDR's Southern Strategy. Anti-lynching bills were first introduced by Republicans. The Costigan-Wagner Anti-Lynching Bill was introduced in 1934, calling on the Roosevelt administration to take an active role in ending [[lynching]] in the United States. Senators Edward Costigan of Colorado and Robert Wagner of New York sponsored the bill. Under its provisions, any state officer who failed to exercise diligence in protecting a person under their care from a lynch mob or who neglected to arrest persons involved in a lynching, could themselves be subject to federal imprisonment for five years and a $5,000 fine. In 1935 attempts were made to persuade Roosevelt to speak out in support of the bill. However, Roosevelt refused. He argued that the white voters in the South would never forgive him if he supported the bill and he would, therefore, lose the next election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even the appearance in the newspapers of the lynching of Rubin Stacy failed to change Roosevelt's mind on the subject. Six deputies were escorting Stacy to Dade County jail in Miami on July 19, 1935, when he was taken by a white mob and hanged by the side of the home of Marion Jones, the woman who had made the original complaint against him. ''The New York Times'' later revealed that &amp;quot;subsequent investigation revealed that Stacy, a homeless tenant farmer, had gone to the house to ask for food; the woman became frightened and screamed when she saw Stacy's face.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.naacp.org/naacp-history-costigan-wagner-act/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Costigan-Wagner Bill had wide support; however, the bill was defeated in 1934, 1935, 1937, 1938 and 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hugo black kkk.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Not until after the Democrat Senate approved FDR's appointment of Hugo Black to a lifetime appointment to the bench, was a conservative journalist able to reveal Black was a Klan member.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Ever since the Draft Riots of 1863, New York was the bastion of Democratic Resistance in the North. It was a Republican mayor however who made the first efforts to coax traditional black Lincoln Republicans into the New Deal coalition. Fiorello La Guardia was a [[RINO]], or Republican New Dealer. Roosevelt provided federal funds to La Guardia and withheld support from La Guardia's opponents. After the 1935 Harlem riot, La Guardia decreed that African-Americans were not to be arrested for anything, and that police patrolling [[Harlem]] could not carry nightsticks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://vault.fbi.gov/.../Eleanor%20Roosevelt%20Part%2016%20of%2040 Eleanor Roosevelt Part 16 of 37 - FBI — The Vault, p. 46]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1937 FDR appointed Alabama Senator [[Hugo Black]] to the Supreme Court. Black was a member of the [[Ku Klux Klan]] and built his career campaigning at Klan meetings.  Black was well known for his anti-[[Catholic]] viewpoints.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=WX2LcraS1EgC&amp;amp;pg=PA219 The Oxford Handbook of Church and State in the United States]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In ''Korematsu v. the United States'',  Black voted to uphold [[President Roosevelt]]'s mass arrests and incarceration of [[Japanese]] men, women, and children based on [[race]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not until the presidential election of 1960 when John Kennedy intervened for the release of Martin Luther King, who was jailed by local Democrats two weeks before the election in Atlanta following a non-violent protest, did the majority of Blacks begin voting Democratic ''en bloc''. The transition was solidified four years later when anti-Vietnam war candidate Barry Goldwater defied Republican Congressional leadership and voted with Southern Democrats to oppose the 1964 Civil Rights Act. It was the first time a GOP nominee carried the South in over 100 years. In fact, it was the only states Goldwater carried.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====White privilege relief efforts====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|New Deal and Fascism}}&lt;br /&gt;
New Deal relief efforts targeted FDR's white Democrat voter base. A Black Republican congressman attached a non-discrimination amendment, however Democrats put a ten percent quota system on Blacks who were suffering from higher incidence of poverty and unemployment than whites or the population in general. In more prosperous times 30 years later the War on Poverty was the New Deal in reverse, targeting Blacks with the assumption that all Blacks were poor and uneducated. Both the New Deal and Great Society were predicated on Marxist [[class warfare]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Journalist John Flynn reported on a Senate investigation into cronyism and corruption in  New Deal programs in Kentucky. Similar abuses were found throughout the nation. {{quotebox|&amp;quot;The WPA foremen were given a sheet upon which they had to report on the standing of the reliefers in the political campaign. It became a part of [[Harry Hopkins|Mr. [Harry] Hopkins]]' [[WPA]] organization in Kentucky to learn how many of the down-and-out had enough devotion to Franklin D. Roosevelt to be entitled to eat. It was not sufficient for an indigent Kentuckian to be just down and out and hungry. He had to believe that the President of the United States was his redeemer and had to be ready to register that belief at the polls. The reliefers were asked to sign papers pledging themselves to the election of the senior senator from Kentucky. They were given campaign buttons and told to wear them and there were instances where, if they refused, they were thrown off the WPA rolls.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;All  this, of course, was in a Democratic primary where only Democrats could vote. But there were a lot of poor Republicans in Kentucky who couldn't vote in the Democratic primary so long as they were Republicans. So they were told to change their registration and become Democrats, or no WPA jobs for them.}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) was born of pure [[progressive]] intentions and modeled after [[Hitler Youth]] programs ongoing in [[Germany]]: employment of young men for conservation work on public lands. Republican Rep. Oscar DePriest, the only black member of Congress, made sure that the 1933 legislation that established the CCC banned [[discrimination]] based on “race, color, or creed.&amp;quot; Black enrollment in the CCC was capped at ten percent of total recruits–roughly equivalent to the proportion of blacks in the U.S. in 1930, but nowhere near proportional to the number of blacks eligible for relief during the [[Great Depression]]. Tens of thousands were turned away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S. Army controlled CCC camp administration and operations, and the [[Wilsonian]] policy of racial segregation transferred over to the new civilian workforce. Most of the CCC's quarter million African-American enrollees served in segregated companies and were unable to attain positions of authority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Progressive Republican states of Wisconsin and Minnesota had integrated camps.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some Southern states categorically excluded blacks, arguing that they were needed for growing and harvesting cotton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://livingnewdeal.org/just-way-segregation-ccc-2/ Just the way society was.” Segregation in the CCC], December 28, 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Housing discrimination becomes law====&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Federal Housing Administration]] (FHA) was created by the Democratic congress in 1934 to insure loans for construction and repairs of homes. White middle-class families could buy suburban homes with little or no down payments and extended 30-year amortization schedules and their monthly charges were often less than rents the families had previously paid to housing authorities or private landlords. But the FHA had an explicit policy of not insuring suburban mortgages for African-Americans, according to writer Richard Rothstein on the ''The American Prospect'' website. In suburban New York’s Nassau County, just east of Queens, Levittown was built in 1947 containing 17,500 mass-produced two-bedroom houses, requiring nothing down and monthly payments of about only $60. At the FHA’s insistence, developer William Levitt did not sell homes to Blacks, and each deed included a prohibition of such resales in the future.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.npr.org/2017/05/03/526655831/a-forgotten-history-of-how-the-u-s-government-segregated-america&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Communist infiltration====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Students for a Democratic Society|Progressives for Obama}}&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal was infiltrated with [[Russia]]n controlled [[Communists]] from the beginning. The [[Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy]] reported in 1996 &amp;quot;The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Hollywood.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/appa6.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix A 6. The Experience of The Bomb]; the report also included, &amp;quot;At this distance it is difficult to conceive the intensity of Communist conviction in the 1930s....Looking back, however, we see more clearly the dilemma ... By 1950... the United States Government possessed information which the American public desperately needed to know: proof that there had been a serious attack on American security by the [[Soviet Union]], with considerable assistance from what was, indeed, an “enemy within.” The fact that we knew this was now known to, or sufficiently surmised by, the Soviet authorities. Only the American public was denied this information. [http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/moynihan/appa7.html Moynihan Commission on Government Secrecy, Appendix A 7. The Cold War]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   [[Hayden Peake]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://intellit.muskingum.edu/alpha_folder/P_folder/peake.html Hayden B. Peake]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; curator of [[Central Intelligence Agency]]’s (CIA) Historical Intelligence Collection observes &amp;quot;[[Venona]] makes absolutely clear that they had active agents in the U.S. State Department, Treasury Department, Justice Department, Senate committee staffs, the military services, the [[Office of Strategic Services]] (OSS), the [[Manhattan Project]], and the [[White House]], as well as wartime agencies. No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20060820054409/http://www.nwc.navy.mil/press/review/2000/summer/re2-su0.htm ''The Venona Progeny''], Hayen B. Peake, Naval War College Review, Summer 2000, Vol. LIII, No. 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Of a handful of presidential assistants whose job was to read and summarize information coming in from all the departments and agencies of the U.S. government for the presidents' daily briefing in wartime, two -  [[Lauchlin Currie]] and [[David K. Niles]] - were KGB agents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://archive.org/details/rooseveltandhopk006306mbp/page/n227 ROOSEVELT AND HOPKINS AN INTIMATE HISTORY], by ROBERT E.SHERWOOD, 1948, p. 228.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  So thorough was [[KGB]] penetration of the Roosevelt Administration, that when [[Army Signals Intelligence]] cryptographer [[Meredith Gardner]] extracted the names of [[Hans Bethe]], [[Niels Bohr]], [[Enrico Fermi]], Harold Urey, [[Edward Teller]] and 11 other scientists working on the [[Manhattan Project]] from a December 2, 1944 KGB encipherment,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.nsa.gov/venona/venon00014.cfm Venona 1699 New York to Moscow, December 2, 1944].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; KGB agent [[William Weisband]] watched him do it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''VENONA: Soviet Espionage and the American Response, 1939-1957'', Robert Louis Benson and Michael Warner, eds., (Wasghington, D.C.: [[National Security Agency]], Central Intelligence Agency, 1996) [https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/csi-publications/books-and-monographs/venona-soviet-espionage-and-the-american-response-1939-1957/preface.htm]; The ''Baltimore Sun'' (Laura Sullivan, &amp;quot;SPY'S ROLE LINKED TO US FAILURE ON KOREA,&amp;quot; 6/29/00) reported that a report newly declassified by the US National Security Agency (NSA) shows that William Weisband alerted the Soviets to extensive US eavesdropping in 1948, resulting in a complete blackout of information from the communist bloc for more than two years. This crippled the NSA's intelligence gathering efforts in the late 1940s and begins to explain why the US was caught unprepared for the [[DPRK]]'s 1950 invasion of the [[ROK]]. NSA historian David A. Hatch, who authored the report, said, &amp;quot;This report answers several significant questions. Up until now, there has been a great lack of knowledge surrounding some of these events ... and this should help sharpen [the public's] understanding.&amp;quot; [Ed. note: This article was included in the US Department of Defense's Early Bird news service for June 29, 2000.] [http://www.nautilus.org/archives/napsnet/dr/0006/JUN29.html#item8]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As early as Roosevelt's first 100 days, [[Harold Ware]] was a [[Communist Party USA]] (CPUSA) official in the [[Agricultural Adjustment Administration]] (AAA) and founded the [[Ware group]]. The group consisted of young lawyers and economists, had about 75 members in 1934 and was divided into about eight cells. The AAA was later found [[unconstitutional]], but by that time the Communist operatives had established jobs in the [[civil service system]] and were simply reassigned elsewhere in government. [[Alger Hiss]], [[Lee Pressman]], [[John Abt]], [[Charles Kramer]], [[Nathan Witt]], [[Henry Collins]], [[George Silverman]], [[Marion Bachrach]], [[John Herrmann]], [[Nathaniel Weyl]], [[Donald Hiss]] and [[Victor Perlo]] were all members.  [[Harry Dexter White]], who was involved in the most auspicious policy [[subversion (political)|subversion]] as Director of the Division of Monetary Research in the [[Treasury Department]], was also affiliated with the group. The Ware group was the CPUSA's covert arm at this time.  Each of these agents not only provided classified documents to Soviet intelligence, but was involved in political influence operations as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1934, a Congressional Investigation was held to examine statements by Dr. William A. Wirt, who headed the Office of Education which later became the [[Department of Education]]. Dr. Wirt had attended a dinner party with several [[Brain Trust]]ers at the home of his secretary, [[Alice Barrows]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A June 1945 [[Venona project]] decryption of Soviet [[KGB]] wartime cables from the Washington D.C. KGB Office to Moscow's Eighth Department, the political intelligence wing, relayed information on matters regarding Attorney General Francis Biddle.  KGB agent [[Charles Kramer]], who served on the staff of several U.S. Senate Subcommittees, and Barrows are the sources of the information. ''Venona 3706 KGB Washington to Moscow, 29 June 1945.''  Mary Van Kleek who headed the Russell Sage Foundation and also served on the Board of the National Council, visited Washington weekly to meet with Barrows and [[Greg Silvermaster|Nathan Gregory Silvermaster]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During [[World War II]] Barrows was the Executive Secretary of the National Council of American-Soviet Friendship.  This organization was declared in 1953 to be a [[Glossary of espionage terms#Fronts and cutouts|Communist front]] organization by the [[Subversive Activities Control Board]] (SACB). In its Findings of Fact, the SACB said the National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, &amp;quot;advances positions...markedly pro-Soviet and...anti-United States Government...is a Communist-action organization which has as its primary purpose to advance the objectives of the world Communist movement under the [[hegemony]] of the Soviet Union; it has the policy to support and defend the Soviet Union under any and all circumstances...We conclude that the National Council of American-Soviet Friendship, Inc., is substantially directed, dominated, and controlled by the Communist Party of the United States...and is primarily operated for the purpose of giving aid and support to...the Soviet Union, a Communist foreign government.&amp;quot; ''[http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=usfexec;cc=usfexec;q1=Barrows;rgn=full%20text;idno=81242.0001.001;didno=81242.0001.001;view=image;seq=511;page=root;size=s;endseq=3;frm=frameset Reports of the Subversive Activities Control Board.]'' Washington. United States Government Printing Office. 1966. Vol. 1, p. 501.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Barrows began working for the Office of Education in 1919 and was a member of the CPUSA, which advocated the violent overthrow of the United States Government.  Several of the Brain Trusters present revealed to Wirt they were CPUSA members. Wirt testified, &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Fbisilvermasterfilevol15p4.JPG|right|300px|thumb|[[CPUSA]] defector [[Louis Budenz]] testified he could name 400 individuals involved in the [[CPUSA#Secret apparatus|Communist conspiracy]];&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft296nb15t&amp;amp;chunk.id=d0e6193&amp;amp;toc.depth=1&amp;amp;toc.id=d0e4718&amp;amp;brand=eschol FBI Headquarters File 100-63, Louis Francis Budenz, Internal Security—C, Serial 122.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; others testified there may have been over 1000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Executive Sessions of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations ([https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/generic/McCarthy_Transcripts.htm McCarthy Hearings 1953-54]).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Silvermaster group]] infiltrated 27 high level Stalinist [[KGB]] operatives into government jobs in the Roosevelt and Truman  administrations, including the first General Secretary of the [[United Nations]], the first head of the [[International Monetary Fund]], the head of the [[Manhattan Project]] as well as speech writers and staff assistants for both the President and Vice President.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster015.pdf  FBI Silvermaster file Vol. 15, pg. 4 pdf.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I was told they believe that by thwarting our then evident economic recovery, they would be able to prolong the country’s destitution until they had demonstrated to the American people that the Government must operate business and commerce.  By propaganda, they would destroy institutions making long term capital loans—and then push Uncle Sam into making these loans. Once Uncle Sam becomes our financier, he must also follow his money with control and management.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hearings, House Select Committee To Investigate Certain Statements of Dr. William Wirt, 73rd Congress, 2nd Session, April 10 and 17, 1934.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Dr Wirt faces the cameras and tells all'', Literary Digest v. 117 (April 21, 1934) p. 7.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;FBI Silvermaster file [http://education-research.org/PDFs/Silvermaster053.pdf Volume 53 June 1946], p. 78 pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Outside government, the [[far-left]] was exerting considerable influence in the labor movement. It dominated the new [[Congress of Industrial Organizations|CIO]], and was building a network of membership organizations. The [[American League Against War and Fascism]] was formed in 1933 and, in 1937, became the American League for Peace and Democracy.  There followed the [[American Youth Congress]], 1934; League of American Writers, 1935; National Negro Congress, 1936; and the American Congress for Democracy and Intellectual Freedom, 1939.  All had significant [[Stalinist]] connections, and fought furious battles with the anti-Communist left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leuchtenburg (1963) 281-3; Irving Howe, Lewis A. Coser, and Julius Jacobson, ''The American Communist Party: a critical history, 1919-1957'' (1957); James R. Barrett, ''William Z. Foster and the Tragedy of American Radicalism'' (2002).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Joseph Berger]], a speechwriter for the Democratc National Committee, also was a KGB agent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://foia.fbi.gov/venona/venona.pdf FBI Verona Files]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the [[D-Day]] landings were happening, Vice President [[Henry Wallace]] undertook a mission to the Far East for the [[Office of War Information]] and was accompanied by [[Owen Lattimore]] and [[John Carter Vincent]] of the [[Institute of Pacific Relations]] (IPR).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Yalta Betrayal'', Wittmer, 1953, pg. 58. Retrieved from GELO.com [http://www.ogleo.com/search/ogleo-History_of_CzechoslovakiaHistory of Czechoslovakia] 05/08/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Wallace and his delegation were given a tour of the Magadan concentration camp at Kolyma. Lattimore wrote a travelogue for the ''[[National Geographic]]'' describing this Siberian [[gulag]] as a combination of the Hudson's Bay Company and the [[TVA]], gushing about how strong and well-fed the inmates were and ascribing to camp commandant Feliks Nikishov “a trained and sensitive interest in art and music and also a deep sense of civic responsibility.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Paul Johnson, [https://books.google.com/books?id=aXm-lKKztywC&amp;amp;pg=PA1&amp;amp;dq=the+survival+of+the+adversary+culture&amp;amp;sig=NBsLl97lMC2A-i-gpuvRZdkewDA#PPA180,M1 ''The Survival of the Adversary Culture'' (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1988) ISBN 1560005548, p. 180]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Upon his return from the Siberian journey Wallace was hailed by leftist [[mainstream media]] &amp;quot;as the conscience of the world&amp;quot; in &amp;quot;the century of the common man.&amp;quot; Nobel Laureate [[Alexander Solzhenitsyn]] wrote years later in ''[[The Gulag Archipelago]]'' that the entire city of Magadan was founded as a Soviet Gulag, and would never have come into existence for any other reason than as a Communist slave camp for dissidents and the politically incorrect undesirables of Soviet society.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,944884,00.html?promoid=googlep Islands of Slavery],, ''[[Time magazine]]'', June 24, 1974.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/10/31/jordan_peterson_reads_foreward_to_the_gulag_archipelago_50th_anniversary.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Commentator Cal Thomas wrote in 2007, {{Cquote|While many Westerners recall Nazi-run death camps like [[Auschwitz]] and [[Buchenwald]], few remember Soviet death camps named Kolyma and Magadan. True, Alexander Solzhenitsyn mentioned them in &amp;quot;The Gulag Archipelago&amp;quot; as did Varlam Sjalamov in &amp;quot;Tales from Kolyma,&amp;quot; but as the late Swedish journalist Andres Kung wrote, &amp;quot;There are people who have still not heard of these communist [[democide|extermination]] camps -- even though the communists preceded the [[Nazi]]s in creating such camps and killed an even larger number of people in their camps.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www3.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20070612-085222-1017r.htm Monument to murder], By Cal Thomas, ''Washington Times'', June 13, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[American Labor Party]] provided the necessary votes to overcome the [[Republican]] lead over the [[Democrat]]s. By 1944 the [[Communist]]s had taken over the American Labor Party completely. In the election of 1944, [[Republican]] Presidential nominee [[Thomas E. Dewey]] got nearly half a million votes more on the Republican ticket than Roosevelt got on the Democratic ticket,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.therealitycheck.org/GuestColumnist/tbrewton010306.htm The (Socialist) Empire Strikes],&lt;br /&gt;
by Thomas E. Brewton, ''The RealityCheck.org''.  Retrieved August 1, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,801534,00.html?promoid=googlep The Side Issues], [[Time magazine]], Nov. 13, 1944.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but Roosevelt was the candidate of two other parties - the American Labor Party of the Communists &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth'', John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948, Book 3, Ch. 10, [https://web.archive.org/web/20040626062741/https://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Ten___Politics__Disease_.htm ''Politics, Disease and History'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the [[Liberal Party]] which consisted of technocrats, [[economic planners]] and American non-Stalinist Communists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Roosevelt Myth'', Book 3, Ch. 2, [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/cgi-bin/framed/2767/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Two___The_White_House_G.htm ''The White House Goes into Business''], Flynn, 1948.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In New York State Roosevelt won 47 electoral votes with a majority of 317,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Roosevelt Myth'', Book 3, Ch. 9, [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Nine___The_Great_Confere.htm ''The Great Conferences''], Flynn, 1948,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Of these 825,000 votes came from the American Labor Party dominated by the Communists, which had also nominated FDR and he had accepted, and the American Liberal Party.  The same thing was true in Illinois, in New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and other large industrial states, although the fact was not so obvious because the radicals operated inside the Democratic party where they could not be so easily identified. [[Strom Thurmond]] also supported FDR's decision to seek a fourth term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kevinbaker.info/c_wtm.html What Trent Meant], Kevin Baker.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several liberal New Deal economists in the [[McCarthyism|McCarthy era]] fled to [[Maoist]] [[China]] to experiment with their real ambitions after being hindered by [[democracy]], law, and the [[Constitution]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Unlike the landlords of sharecroppers, these former American civil servants turned Chinese Communist civil servants simply outlawed &amp;quot;landlordism,&amp;quot; and exterminated the landlords, saving the state treasury billions in agricultural subsidies.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Their time in China is memorialized in history as the [[Three Years of Disasters]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Historian Frank Dikötter asserts that &amp;quot;coercion, terror, and systematic violence were the foundation of the [[Great Leap Forward]]&amp;quot; and it &amp;quot;motivated one of the most deadly mass killings of human history&amp;quot;. Dikötter, Frank (2010). pp. x, xi. ISBN 0-8027-7768-6&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The death toll of this [[socialist]] experiment is estimated at 55 million.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.liberation.fr/planete/2011/06/17/la-chine-creuse-ses-trous-de-memoire_743211|title=La Chine creuse ses  trous de mémoire|last=|first=|date=|website=La Liberation|publisher=|language=fr|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[World War II]], [[Moscow]] ordered all American communists to go underground and join the Democratic party. The story of [[Frank Marshall Davis]], Barack Obama's mentor,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/main/AboutHFP/tabid/64/Default.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; is intertwined with the Hawaii Democrats' rise to power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aim.org/aim-column/the-frank-marshall-davis-network-in-hawaii/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Communists controlled the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), the ILWU controlled the Hawaii Democratic Party, and in 1954, union-based election campaigns launched the Hawaii Democrats into control of the state legislature.  Hawaii's first Democratic Governor Jack Burns said,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Every guy in the ILWU was at one time or another a member of the Communist Party of America. This is where they got their [[community organizing|organizational information]] and how to organize, and how to bring groups together and how to create cells and how to make movements that are undetected by the bosses.}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 1959 Hawaii became a state.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hawaii.gov/statehood/history&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  when Burns captured the governor's office in 1962 the Democrats created a [[single party control]]led state unbroken for four decades until the election of [[Republican]] Governor [[Linda Lingle]] in the aftermath of the [[9/11 attacks]] in 2002. During those decades in some sessions sat as few as one Republican legislator.  In 1976 the Democratic-controlled Hawaii State Legislature passed a resolution honoring [[Koji Ariyoshi]], a lieutenant of [[Mao Zedong]], the single biggest mass murderer of all time.  Herbert Romerstein,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://education-research.org/CSR/romerstein.htm The Education and Research Institute], Washington, DC.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://intellit.org/alpha_folder/R_folder/romerstein.html Herbert Romerstein], ''The Literature of Intelligence: A Bibliography of Materials, with Essays, Reviews, and Comments'', J. Ransom Clark Emeritus, Muskingum University, New Concord, Ohio. Published in 2007: J. Ransom Clark, Intelligence and National Security: A Reference Handbook (Westport, CT: Praeger Security International Reference, 2007. [http://www.greenwood.com/psi/book_detail.aspx?sku=C9298])&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; formerly head of the office to Counter Soviet Disinformation at the United States Information Agency (USIA) commented, &amp;quot;this was the atmosphere that young Barack Obama grew up in...We honor Soviet spies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/Transcript_May_22_edited_version.pdf ''The Stealth Candidate''], Edited Transcript May 22, 2008, Briefing on Barack Obama's Communist Connections Featuring Cliff Kincaid and Herbert Romerstein.  Accuracy in Media.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mao and Ariyoshi were Soviet operatives prior to the death of Stalin and the [[Sino-Soviet split]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Michael Whitney Straight]] became a Communist Party member in the Stalin era and worked as a speechwriter for President Roosevelt. After WWII Straight took over as publisher of his family-owned ''[[The New Republic]]'' magazine, the liberal movement's flagship publication, where he hired former [[Vice President of the United States|U.S. Vice President]] and 1948 Progressive Party presidential candidate [[Henry A. Wallace]] as the magazine's editor. Straight later served as the deputy chairman of the Great Society [[National Endowment for the Arts]] program from 1969 to 1977 handing out taxpayer cash and federal grants to [[politically correct]] [[Cultural Marxist]] recipients.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Immigration and refugees====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[Kristallnacht]] in November 1938, many Jews within Germany decided that it was time to leave. The ''S.S St. Louis'' carrying 937 passengers, most of them Jewish, set sail from Hamburg to [[Cuba]] on May 13, 1939. In Cuba the passengers were denied entrance without posting a $500 bond. A few dozen passengers disembarked. The ship set sail for Florida.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once in Florida waters, Sec. of State [[Cordell Hull]] advised President Roosevelt to deny the Jews [[asylum]]. The [[U.S. Coast Guard]] and planes followed the ''St. Louis'' to prevent it from landing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-tragedy-of-s-s-st-louis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Instructions to japanese.png|right|250px|thumb]] &lt;br /&gt;
Many Jews had fled to Central and South America to escape [[Nazi]] persecution. When war broke out, these [[Latin America]]n countries did not want German Jews. They were deported to the United States where the Roosevelt administration was willing to hold them as German citizens in America [[concentration camp]]s. The Roosevelt administration traded them back to Germany in exchange for American civilians held in detention in Germany. The fate of these Jews is unknown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/internment-of-germans.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1943, Roosevelt told French military leaders at the Casablanca Conference that &amp;quot;the number of Jews engaged in the practice of the professions&amp;quot; in liberated North Africa &amp;quot;should be definitely limited&amp;quot;, lest there be a recurrence of &amp;quot;the understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://new.wymaninstitute.org/2013/08/a-presidents-private-thoughts-about-jews/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Mass incarceration of minorities====&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia states that Democrat President Franklin Roosevelt set up &amp;quot;[[concentration camp]]s&amp;quot; during  World War II while the United States was at war with [[Nazi Germany]]: &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;Executive Order 9066 was a United States presidential executive order signed and issued during World War II by United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt on February 19, 1942. This order authorized the Secretary of War to prescribe certain areas as military zones, clearing the way for the incarceration of Japanese Americans, German Americans, and Italian Americans in U.S. [[concentration camps]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_9066&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
====Supreme Court====&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin Roosevelt nominated [[James F. Byrnes]] to the Supreme Court and was confirmed by the Democrat Senate in 1941.  The NAACP opposed his confirmation in a telegram to the White House: &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“If Senator Byrnes at any time in his long public career failed to take a position inimical to the human and citizenship rights of 13 million American Negro citizens, close scrutiny of his record fails to reveal it.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
As a member of the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate for more than two decades, Byrnes personally blocked a Senate investigation of a South Carolina lynching and opposed federal anti-lynching legislation, insisting that “rape is responsible, directly and indirectly, for most of the lynching in America.”  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Byrnes later held the office of Secretary of State under President Harry Truman. He remained a vocal opponent of integration throughout his term as South Carolina governor from 1951 to 1955. In his inaugural address, Byrnes proclaimed, &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“Whatever is necessary to continue the separation of the races in the schools of South Carolina is going to be done by the white people of the state. That is my ticket as a private citizen. It will be my ticket [as governor].”}} &lt;br /&gt;
A building and a professorship at the University of South Carolina bear his name, as do Byrnes Auditorium at Winthrop University, Byrnes Hall dormitory at Clemson University, and James F. Byrnes High School in Duncan, South Carolina.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://segregationinamerica.eji.org/report/segregation-forever-leaders.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Truman to Kennedy: 1945–1963===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:FDR Truman and KKK.jpeg|left|250px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
Harry Truman took over unexpectedly in 1945, and the rifts inside the party that Roosevelt had papered over began to emerge. Former Vice President [[Henry A. Wallace]], a progressive, denounced Truman as a war-monger for his anti-Soviet programs, the [[Truman Doctrine]], [[Marshall Plan]], and [[NATO]].   By cooperating with internationalist Republicans, Truman succeeded in defeating isolationists on the right and pro-Soviets on the left to establish a [[Cold War]] program that lasted until the fall of Communism in 1991. Wallace supporters and fellow travelers of the far left were pushed out of the party and the CIO in 1946-48 by young anti-Communists like [[Hubert Humphrey]], [[Walter Reuther]], and [[Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.]]. [[Hollywood]] emerged in the 1940s as an important new base in the party, led by movie-star politicians such as [[Ronald Reagan]], who at this point in time strongly supported Roosevelt and Truman. Reagan was elected president of the [[Screen Actors Guild]] and left the party over communist infiltration of his union.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=I4-UBnd20K4C&amp;amp;pg=PA155 Ronald Reagan in Hollywood: Movies and Politics]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By October 1946, the G.I. Bill had placed 6,500 former soldiers in nonfarm jobs in Mississippi; 86 percent of the skilled and semiskilled jobs were filled by whites, 92 percent of the unskilled ones by Blacks. In New York and northern New Jersey, fewer than 100 of the 67,000 mortgages insured by the G.I. Bill supported home purchases by nonwhites. Discrimination continued as well in elite Northern colleges. The University of Pennsylvania, along with Columbia the least discriminatory of the Ivy League colleges, enrolled only 46 Black students in its student body of 9,000 in 1946. The traditional Black colleges did not have places for an estimated 70,000 Black veterans in 1947. At the same time, white universities were doubling their enrollments and prospering with the infusion of public and private funds, and of students with their G.I. benefits.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://atlantablackstar.com/2015/02/04/9-ways-franklin-d-roosevelts-new-deal-purposely-excluded-blacks-people/5/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the right, the Republicans blasted Truman's domestic policies. &amp;quot;Had Enough?&amp;quot; was the winning slogan as Republicans recaptured Congress in 1946.  Many party leaders were ready to dump Truman, but they lacked an alternative. The party was split three ways. [[Henry Wallace]], who Roosevelt threw off the ticket in 1944 ran as a [[Progressive]] while [[J. Strom Thurmond]], who remained a staunch supporter of FDR split off and ran as a [[Dixiecrat]].  Republican overconfidence led to many failing to show up at the polls and Truman was reelected in a stunning surprise.  However, all of Truman's Fair Deal proposals, such as universal health care were defeated by the [[Conservative Coalition]] in Congress.  His [[nationalization]] of the steel industry was reversed by the Supreme Court.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1948, [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] won an election for [[U.S. Senate]] from the state of [[Texas]] by [[Democrat_election_fraud#1948_Texas_Senate|stealing the election]], according even to historians sympathetic to him.  Johnson ran against former governor Coke Stevenson; neither candidate won a majority of the votes in the election, which under Texas law forced a runoff between Johnson and Stevenson.  Johnson then claimed an 87-vote victory over Stevenson in the runoff, which was fraudulent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See eg Robert A Caro Master of the ''Senate Means of Assent''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Johnson's partner in [[crime]] in the election theft, [[Abe Fortas]], whom Johnson later appointed to the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] and was confirmed by a two-thirds majority of the Democrat Senate, is the only Supreme Court Justice to have resigned over corruption charges.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In foreign policy, Europe was occupied but divided between the Western alliance and the Communist bloc as troubles mounted in Asia. American troops were now facing down the New Deal's Stalinist allies in the streets of Berlin.  Kuomintang China, a major ally in the war against [[Japan]], fell to the Stalinist communist bloc in 1949. Truman, under the [[UN]] banner, entered the [[Korean War]] without formal Congressional approval—the last time a president would ever do so. When the war stalemated in 1951 because of Truman's reluctance to use nuclear weapons, he fired General [[Douglas MacArthur]], a hero to conservatives. Republicans blasted Truman's failure to stop Communist gains in Asia. A series of petty scandals among friends and buddies of Truman further tarnished his image, allowing [[Dwight Eisenhower]] and the Republicans in 1952 to crusade against &amp;quot;Korea, Communism and Corruption.&amp;quot; Truman dropped out of the presidential race early in 1952, leaving no obvious successor. The convention nominated [[Adlai Stevenson]] in 1952 and 1956, only to see him overwhelmed by two Eisenhower landslides.  Stevenson, a New Deal liberal, adopted the traditional Democratic Southern Strategy of choosing a Southern white male for Vice President in both elections to appeal to Southern voters, who regularly would not allow African Americans to register to vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Brown vs. Board of Education====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Brown vs. Board of Education}}&lt;br /&gt;
The election of a Republican for the first time in 20 years was momentous. Eisenhower appointed Republican California Governor [[Earl Warren]] as [[Chief Justice]] of the Supreme Court.  All the other members had been appointed by Roosevelt and Truman who believed courts should defer to the policymaking prerogatives of the White House and Congress. Warren convened a meeting of the justices and presented to them the simple argument that the only reason to sustain segregation was a deep-rooted belief in the inferiority of African-Americans. In ''[[Brown v. Topeka Board of Education]]'', Warren produced a unanimous decision that said: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;Segregation of white and colored children in public schools has a detrimental effect upon the colored children. The impact is greater when it has the sanction of the law, for the policy of separating the races is usually interpreted as denoting the inferiority of the Negro group…Any language in contrary to this finding is rejected. We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.”}}&lt;br /&gt;
In Congress, the powerful duo of House Speaker [[Sam Rayburn]] and Senate Majority leader [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] held the party together, often by compromising with Eisenhower. After the Little Rock Crisis of 1957, the party made dramatic gains in the 1958 midterms and seemed to have a permanent lock on Congress. Indeed, Democrats had majorities in the House every election from 1930 to 1992 (except 1946 and 1952). Most southern Congressmen were conservative Democrats, however, and they usually worked with conservative Republicans. The result was a [[Conservative Coalition]] that blocked practically all socialist domestic legislation from 1937 to the 1970s, except for a brief spell 1964–65, when Johnson neutralized its power.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John Kennedy texas.png|left|300px|thumb|John Kennedy was elected using the same Southern Strategy FDR did by putting a Texan on the ticket.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.jstor.org/stable/23535517?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents John F. Kennedy's Southern Strategy, 1956-1960], Guy Paul Land, ''The North Carolina Historical Review'', Vol. 56, No. 1 (January, 1979), pp. 41-63.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The nomination of [[John F. Kennedy]] in 1960 energized the Catholic population, which jammed motorcades and turned out in heavy numbers (over 80% voted for Kennedy), while also causing a backlash among white Protestants (over 70% of whom voted for Republican candidate [[Richard Nixon]]).  Reaching beyond the traditional Irish, German, Italian and Polish Catholic ethnics, Viva Kennedy set out to mobilize the previously passive Latino vote, and it perhaps provided the margin of victory for Kennedy in Texas and New Mexico. His brother, [[Robert Kennedy]], who managed the campaign, opposed the outreach to Black voters and sided with traditional Southern racists of the New Deal coalition.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=kLspqSlNjfYC&amp;amp;pg=PA309&amp;amp;lpg=PA309&amp;amp;dq=three+Southern+governors+told+us+that+if+Jack+supported+Jimmy+Hoffa,+Nikita+Khrushchev,+or+Martin+Luther+King,+they+would+throw+their+states+to+Nixon&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=9PCWxfix0P&amp;amp;sig=ACfU3U2rlCOdSQJLr7w1x8AhpeJODSmG6w&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwj58fD9uIngAhWMoYMKHRY0CPAQ6AEwCnoECAYQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=three%20Southern%20governors%20told%20us%20that%20if%20Jack%20supported%20Jimmy%20Hoffa%2C%20Nikita%20Khrushchev%2C%20or%20Martin%20Luther%20King%2C%20they%20would%20throw%20their%20states%20to%20Nixon&amp;amp;f=false Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero], [[Chris Matthews]], Simon and Schuster, Nov 6, 2012, p. 309.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bobby Kennedy was furious with campaign aides for talking with King, and felt it would cost them the election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kennedy's victory reinvigorated the party. His youth, vigor and intelligence caught the popular imagination. In foreign policy he was strongly anti-Communist, and promptly launched an invasion of Castro's Cuba; it failed badly. A few new programs like the Peace Corps provided pacifists with an alternative to two years of military service in the peacetime draft.  In terms of civil rights legislation, his proposals were all cautious and incremental.  In three years he was unable to pass any significant civil rights legislation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kennedy's election did mark the coming of age of the Catholic component of the New Deal Coalition.  After 1964 middle-class Catholics started voting Republicans in the same proportion as their Protestant neighbors.  Except for the Chicago of [[Richard J. Daley]], the last of the Democratic machines faded away.  His involvement in Vietnam proved momentous, for his successor Lyndon Johnson decided to stay, and double the investment, and double the bet again and again until over 500,000 American soldiers were fighting in that small country.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Southern Manifesto====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Southern Manifesto}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Southern Manifesto was a document issued in response to the Supreme Court's 1954 ruling ''[[Brown v. Board of Education]]'', which integrated public schools.  School segregation laws were some of the most enduring and best-known of the [[Jim Crow]] laws that characterized the American South at the time.  All but twenty-eight of the 138 southern Democrat members of Congress signed this Southern Manifesto, including 19 of the Majority Democrat Senators.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://d1lexza0zk46za.cloudfront.net/history/am-docs/southern-manifesto.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[John Sparkman]], 1952 Vice Presidential candidate as part of the Democrat's Southern Strategy, [[J. William Fulbright]]  mentor of Bill Clinton, Richard Brevard Russell of the [[Warren Commission]], [[Sam Ervin]] of the [[Watergate]] Committee, [[Hale Boggs]] (the father of [[NPR]]'s Cokie Roberts), and Wilbur Mills were all signatories. It reads in part: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;This unwarranted exercise of power by the Court, contrary to the Constitution, is creating chaos and confusion in the States principally affected. It is destroying the amicable relations between the white and Negro races that have been created through 90 years of patient effort by the good people of both races. It has planted hatred and suspicion where there has been heretofore friendship and understanding....We commend the motives of those States which have declared the intention to resist forced integration by any lawful means.&amp;quot;}} [[File:Little Rock Nine.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Republican President Dwight Eisenhower called out the 101st Airborne to protect Black school children from Democrat protesters after a Democrat governor refused to implement a desegregation order written by the Republican Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Southern Manifesto was signed on a large mahogany conference table in Sen. [[John Stennis]]' office which Stennis used as his desk and referred to as &amp;quot;the flagship of the [[Confederacy]].&amp;quot; The table was used by segregationist and co-signer of the Southern Manifesto Sen. [[Richard Russell]] before his retirement.  When Stennis retired in 1988, Sen. [[Joseph Biden]] took over Stennis' office, including the conference table.  When Sen. Biden was elected Vice President in 2008, Biden had the flagship of the Confederacy moved into the Vice President's residence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the first challenges to ''Brown v. Board of Education'' occurred when Democrat Governor [[Orval E. Faubus]] ordered the Arkansas National Guard to prevent African-American students from enrolling at [[Little Rock]] Central High School. Central High was an all-white school. Faubus  ordered the troops to &amp;quot;accomplish the mission of maintaining or restoring law and order and to preserve the peace, health, safety and security of the citizens.&amp;quot; A force of 289 soldiers was assembled. The commander told nine black students, six girls and thee boys ages 15–17 years old who were attempting to enter the school, to return home. The standoff continued for three weeks. Little Rock Democrat mayor Woodrow Wilson Mann appealed to President Eisenhower to help end the deadlock. Eisenhower sent the [[101st Airborne Division]] to federalized the entire 10,000-member Arkansas National Guard. The students were allowed to enroll. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Faubus was re-elected in 1958 with 82.5% of the vote over a Republican challenger. Faubus ordered the closure of four public high schools that year, preventing both black and white students from attending school while seeking a two and a half year delay on de-segregation until January 1961 in Federal Court when there would be a possibility of a Democratic president.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====1957 Civil Rights Act====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Civil Rights Act of 1957}}&lt;br /&gt;
Republican Attorney General Herbert Brownell originally proposed the Civil Rights Act of 1957. Democrat Majority Leader Lyndon Johnson had Judiciary chairman Sen. [[James Eastland]] drastically water-down the House version, removing stringent voting protection clauses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1951-2000/The-Civil-Rights-Act-of-1957/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Caro, Robert, ''Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson'', Chapter 39&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The bill passed 285–126 in the House with Republicans providing the majority of votes 167–19 and Democrats 118–107.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;HR 6127. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1957. PASSED. YEA SUPPORTS PRESIDENT'S POSITION. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/85-1957/h42&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It then passed 72–18 in the Senate, with Republicans again supplying the majority of votes, 43–0 and Democrats voting 29–18. Sen. John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts, who later ran for president, voted against it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://kennedysandking.com/reviews/the-kennedys-and-civil-rights-how-the-msm-continues-to-distort-history-part-2 The Kennedys and Civil Rights: How the MSM Continues to Distort History, Part 2], James DiEugenio, 07 October 2018. &amp;quot;Kennedy sided with the [[segregation]]ists on a complicated procedural matter that watered down that bill. (p. 58) Even for Levingston, this is sorry. What watered down the bill was the removal of something that Kennedy voted ''for''. This was called Title III. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Kennedy's 1957 book, ''Profiles in Courage'', celebrated the vote of Sen. Edmund Ross to acquit Pres. [[Andrew Johnson]], the first step in ending Republican [[Reconstruction]] reforms and paving the way for the Democrat era of [[Jim Crow]] laws and the [[segregation]] era.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://brewminate.com/andrew-johnson-impeachment-and-reconstruction/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1957 Civil Rights Act was the first federal civil rights legislation passed by the United States Congress since the Republicans passed the Civil Rights Act of 1875. Johnson told Sen. [[Richard Russell]], {{quotebox|&amp;quot;These Negroes, they're getting pretty [[uppity]] these days and that's a problem for us since they've got something now they never had before, the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we've got to do something about this, we've got to give them a little something, just enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference. For if we don't move at all, then their allies will line up against us and there'll be no way of stopping them, we'll lose the filibuster and there'll be no way of putting a brake on all sorts of wild legislation. It'll be Reconstruction all over again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Said to Senator Richard Russell, Jr. (D-GA) regarding the Civil Rights Act of 1957. As quoted in [http://books.google.com/books?id=HS9aAAAAYAAJ ''Lyndon Johnson and the American Dream''] (1977), by Doris Kearns Goodwin, New York: New American Library, p. 155.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Johnson, war and riots===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Johnson administration}}&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal Coalition began to fracture as union and religious leaders demanded support for [[civil rights]], upsetting the party's traditional base of Democrat segregationists who themselves became dependent on government largess. In 1948 the party platform for the first time in its history showed some support for civil rights. The Republicans passed civil rights legislation with the [[13th Amendment]], [[14th Amendment]], [[15th Amendment]], [[Emancipation Proclamation]], the Civil Rights Act of 1875, and first passed anti-lynching legislation in 1922, which Democrats killed by [[filibuster]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationalreview.com/2012/05/party-civil-rights-kevin-d-williamson/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Lyndon Johnson showing scars.jpg|right|300px|thumb|A new level crudeness: Johnson shows off scars from gallbladder surgery to photographers and the world. Johnson is said to have given instructions to staff and press interviews while sitting on the toilet.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4617681/toilet-time-lbj&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Johnson regularly used the &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; word.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The party's reversal on civil rights culminated with Democratic President [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] finally signing the [[bi-partisan]] [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]], which he called &amp;quot;the N****r Bill.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/lyndon-johnson-civil-rights-racism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In lobbying fellow Democrats  for the bill, Johnson said, {{quotebox|&amp;quot;I'll have them n*gg*rs voting Democratic for two hundred years.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Said to two governors regarding the Civil Rights Act of 1964, according to then-''Air Force One'' steward Robert MacMillan as quoted in [http://books.google.com/books?id=lJz-yIZNE2sC ''Inside the White House''] (1996), by Ronald Kessler, New York: Simon and Schuster, p. 33.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} Democrats tried to block passage by filibustering for 75 hours, including a 14-hour and 13-minute speech by the Exalted Cyclops, Sen. [[Robert Byrd]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sen. [[Theodore Bilbo]], whom Byrd swore his Klan oath to, said in 1949 on ''Meet the Press'', &amp;quot;Once a Ku Klux, always a Ku Klux.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who later became Senate Democrat Leader in the Reagan era. The filibuster failed when the Senate invoked cloture for only the second time since 1927.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Civil_Rights_Filibuster_Ended.htm|title=Civil Rights Filibuster Ended |work=Art &amp;amp; History Historical Minutes|publisher=United States Senate|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The law was intended to block Republican gains in the South followed by buying off Blacks with [[Great Society]] [[welfare]] and [[affirmative action]] programs. According to LBJ biographer Robert Caro, Johnson told his chauffeur: {{Quotebox|&amp;quot;Let me tell you one thing, n*gg*r. As long as you are black, and you’re gonna be black till the day you die, no one’s gonna call you by your g*dd*mn name. So no matter what you are called, n*gg*r, you just let it roll off your back like water, and you’ll make it. Just pretend you’re a g*dd*mn piece of furniture.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://slate.com/culture/2002/05/lbj-s-alleged-compassion.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
African-Americans formed an anomalous coalition with low-income white Democrat racists who were dependent on New Deal and Great Society [[welfare]] programs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Chicago 1969: Assumed to be natural enemies, these groups united in their calls for [[economic justice]].&amp;quot; [http://theconversation.com/chicago-1969-when-black-panthers-aligned-with-confederate-flag-wielding-working-class-whites-68961 When Black Panthers aligned with Confederate-flag-wielding, working-class whites], Colette Gaiter, ''The Conversation'', January 8, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both African Americans and racist Democrats opposed Republican efforts to maintain fiscal and budgetary sanity. The coalition gave cover to bigoted Democrats to hide their racism, while accusing Republicans who wanted to balance the budget of prejudice. [[Malcolm X]] described it this way: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;The white Liberal differs from the white Conservative only in one way; the Liberal is more [[deceit]]ful, more hypocritical, than the Conservative. Both want power, but the White Liberal is the one who has perfected the art of posing as the Negro's friend and benefactor and by winning the friendship and support of the Negro, the White Liberal is able to use the Negro as a pawn or a weapon in this political football game, that is constantly raging, between the White Liberals and the White Conservatives. The American Negro is nothing, but a political &amp;quot;football game&amp;quot; that is constantly raging between the white liberals and white conservatives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7YmjWW9tx4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to popular Democrat mythology, Democrat Governor [[George Wallace]] won [[the South]] in 1968 in a three-way contest against Nixon and Humphrey. There was no Nixon &amp;quot;[[Southern Strategy]].&amp;quot; The South continued to reject Yankee liberals (Humphrey in 1968, McGovern in 1972, Mondale in 1984, Dukakis in 1988, Kerry in 2004).  At the state and local level, the Republicans made slow but steady gains. As racism in the South declined, Republicans in the South increased.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/ol7OMGBDMao&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The South became competitive in presidential politics as early as the 1920s and by 1980 gave strong support to Republican Ronald Reagan, rejecting northern liberal candidates.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.prageru.com/videos/why-did-democratic-south-become-republican&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Democrats responded with a new Southern Strategy - putting Southerners at the top of the ticket - Carter in 1976 and 1980, Clinton in 1992 and 1996, Gore in 2000, and calling Yankee Republicans &amp;quot;racist.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the 1990s the GOP was competitive at the state and local level throughout the South. The Democrats made gains in the west through [[illegal immigration]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://cis.org/Report/Injustice-All-Excerpt-Sellout-Inside-Story-President-Clintons-Impeachment&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; converting [[California]] to a Democratic stronghold and gaining in fast-growing Arizona and Nevada. The Northeast became more and more a Democratic enclave, especially after 2006 when numerous Republican moderates were defeated for reelection.  The Midwest remained a battleground.  The Democrats made strong gains in Illinois but slipped a little in Minnesota.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====1964 Convention: Mississippi Freedom Party====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Black history}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Mississippi Freedom Party was organized by African Americans to challenge the establishment Democratic Party, which allowed participation only by whites. The party ran a slate of delegates with close to 80,000 people casting ballots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crmvet.org/tim/tim63b.htm#1963msballot Freedom Ballot in MS] ~ Civil Rights Movement Veterans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The party hoped to replace the Regular Democrats as the official Mississippi delegation at the 1964 Democratic National Convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the convention the party challenged the Regular Democrats' right to be seated, claiming that the Regular Democrats were illegally elected in a segregated process that violated both party regulations and [[federal law]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crmvet.org/disc/mfdp.htm The Mississippi Movement &amp;amp; the MFDP] ~ Civil Rights Movement Veterans&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Equal Protection Clause had been on the books for nearly 100 years already. The Democratic Party referred the challenge to the credentials committee,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book&lt;br /&gt;
  | last = Branch&lt;br /&gt;
  | first = Taylor&lt;br /&gt;
  | title = Pillar of Fire&lt;br /&gt;
  | publisher = Simon &amp;amp; Schuster&lt;br /&gt;
  | date = 1998}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which televised its proceedings and allowed the nation to see and hear the moving testimony of several delegates and the retaliation inflicted on them by Democrats for attempting to vote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carmichael, Stokely, and Charles V.  Hamilton. ''Black Power: The Politics of Liberation,'' (New York: Random House, 1967), p. 90.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After that, most observers and pundits thought the credentials committee were ready to unseat the Regular Democrats and seat the Freedom Party delegates in their place. But some Democrats from other states threatened to leave the convention and bolt the party if the Regular Democrats were unseated. President Johnson wanted a united convention and feared losing support. To ensure his victory in November, Johnson maneuvered to prevent the Mississippi Freedom Democrats from replacing the all-white Regular Democrats. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two future Democrat Presidential nominees, [[Hubert Humphrey]] and [[Walter Mondale]], denied Blacks [[equal protection]] and made a mockery of the [[civil rights movement]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.minnpost.com/eric-black-ink/2011/05/sad-story-humphreys-role-1964-democratic-convention/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Johnson held a private meeting with Humphrey, Mondale, Roy Wilkins, [[Andrew Young]], [[United Auto Workers]] President [[Walter Reuther]] and [[Martin Luther King Jr.]] A plan was hatched to offer the Freedom Democrats two non-voting ''At-Large'' seats with observer status, rather than replace the all-white delegation which had been undemocratically and illegally elected.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mills, Kay, ''This Little Light of Mine: The Life of Fannie Lou Hamer,'' (New York: Plume, 1994), p. 5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Johnson arrogated to himself the right to pick which two, and Johnson chose one white and one black. Johnson dispatched Humphrey and Mondale and ordered them to make sure that “that illiterate woman,&amp;quot; Fannie Lou Hamer would never be a delegate. Dr. King protested and was told by Reuther to shut up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The offer was rejected, but Humphrey and Mondale remained powerhouse liberals in the Democratic party for another 20 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Great Society====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|War on Poverty}}&lt;br /&gt;
By the 1960s, the [[Preamble]] clause of the [[Constitution]], &amp;quot;to promote the general welfare,&amp;quot;  was re-interpreted to justify massive [[welfare|wealth transfer]] programs under the rubric of &amp;quot;Welfare.&amp;quot; This creeping [[Marxist dialectic]] and [[communism]] was accredited to [[Michael Harrington]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/01/08/everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-war-on-poverty/ |title=Everything you need to know about the war on poverty |work=Washington Post |date=January 8, 2014 |quote=&amp;quot;Many historians, such as Harrington biographer Maurice Isserman, credit Harrington and the book [The Other America] (which John F. Kennedy purportedly read while in office, along with the MacDonald review) with spurring Kennedy and then Johnson to formulate an anti-poverty agenda&amp;quot; }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; founder of the [[Democratic Socialists of America]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[http://www.marxisthistory.org/history/usa/parties/dsa/1973/1000-dsoc-dl006.pdf Newsletter of the Democratic Left]'', October 1973, page 3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Democratic Left, Sep. 1975, page 2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and adopted by Lyndon Johnson and the Democratic Congress as  the focal point of law, government social spending, and [[affirmative action]] programs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Kurtz|first=Stanley|title=Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism|publisher=Simon and Schuster|date=2010|pages=31}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Horowitz|first=David|title=The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton, and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party|publisher=Simon and Schuster|date=2006|pages=85}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Democrat coalition of 1960s.jpg|left|300px|thumb|The Democrat coalition of the 1960s. Racist whites who benefited from New Deal welfare programs now aligned with Blacks who were beneficiaries of the [[War on Poverty]]. Republicans who wanted to cut off vote buying out of the public treasury and balance the budget were unjustly accused by both of &amp;quot;racism.&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
African Americans, who were excluded from many New Deal programs, now were the direct targets of the  [[Great Society]]. Single Black women could receive cash payments to have children outside wedlock.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/1983/11/20/us/breakup-of-black-family-imperils-gains-of-decades.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Johnson and the Democrat's intended to capture the nation's 20 million African-Americans as a dependent and loyal voting bloc within the Democratic party, now that a bi-partisan majority of Republicans and Democrats smashed the Democratic party's stranglehold on the South, which had denied Black voter participation for a century. Great Society programs had a devastating impact on Black families and communities in the following decades.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/262726/how-liberal-welfare-state-destroyed-black-america-john-perazzo&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term, &amp;quot;poverty&amp;quot; became a [[dog whistle]] for &amp;quot;black,&amp;quot; and the term &amp;quot;rich&amp;quot; became a codeword for &amp;quot;white.&amp;quot; [[Class warfare]] and [[Cultural Marxism]] became the focus in [[public education]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/25/us/education-the-mainstreaming-of-marxism-in-us-colleges.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. [[Thomas Sowell]] observed that &amp;quot;despite the grand myth that black economic progress began or accelerated with the passage of the civil rights laws and &amp;quot;war on poverty&amp;quot; programs of the 1960s, the cold fact is that the poverty rate among blacks fell from 87% in 1940 to 47% by 1960.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.creators.com/read/thomas-sowell/11/14/a-legacy-of-liberalism A Legacy of Liberalism], By Dr. Thomas Sowell, November 18, 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The war on poverty increased the percentage of mothers and children dependent on the federal government to keep them above the poverty line. Although the number of dependent people had been declining for decades before the &amp;quot;war on poverty&amp;quot; began, this downward trend reversed itself and had a devastating effect on the black family structure, and black communities overall.  Fathers were driven out of the home so that females could meet eligibility requirements, young males' marriage and family prospects precipitously dropped, out of wedlock births and street gangs, crime, and violence proliferated in coming decades. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall federal spending on programs for the poor escalated as eligibility rules for [[welfare]] and [[Social Security]] were loosened, the size of benefits was increased, and unemployment insurance was made more available to more people, and for longer periods of time. The number of people receiving [[public assistance]] more than doubled from 1960 to 1977. The dollar value of public [[housing]] rose nearly five-fold in a decade and the amount spent on [[food stamps]] rose more than ten-fold. All government-provided in-kind benefits increased about eight-fold from 1965 to 1969 and more than twenty-fold by 1974. Federal spending on such social welfare programs not only rose in dollar terms and in real terms, but also as a percentage of the nation's gross national product, going from 8 percent of GNP in 1960 to 16 percent by 1974.  A classic example of income transfer or &amp;quot;redistribution of wealth&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for urban ghetto [[riot]]s, they raged across the country during this era. [[Newark]] Mayor Hugh J. Addonizio (D) called for a federal investigation of the city's anti-poverty agency which received Great Society funding to determine if it had, in any way, contributed to the city's riots in which 26 persons were killed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal67-1313423&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More funding was approved anyway. Later, the strife declined sharply after the beginning of the Nixon administration, which opposed the whole ‘war on poverty’ approach and eventually abolished the Office of Economic Opportunity, which had been the spearhead of this program. Still later, during the eight years of the Reagan presidency–supposedly the nadir of neglect–major urban riots became virtually extinct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eventually, however, even official poverty began to rise, so that a larger number of people were in poverty in 1992 than were in poverty in 1964, when the &amp;quot;war on poverty&amp;quot; began.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;n21 U.S. Bureau of Census, Current Population Records, Series P60-185 (Washington, D.C. General Printing Office 1993) p.ix. (p. 13-14)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1992, more than half of all [[black]] adults had never been married, quite aside from an additional 16 percent who had been either [[divorce]]d or [[widow]]ed. By contrast, only 21 percent of [[white]] adults had never been married. More than half of all black children–57 percent–were living with only one parent and another 7.5 percent were not living with either parent. Thus, only a little more than a third of black children were living in traditional two-parent households. Of 190,000 black children whose parents were currently still teenagers, only 5,000 were living with both parents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1978/06/25/out-of-wedlock-black-children-draw-a-community-together/7c431555-27fa-483a-acdb-0ee09ea4acbe/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As street gangs and crime proliferated, Democrats responded with mass incarceration of Blacks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Civil disturbances====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:View-of-moratorium-demonstrators-p.jpg|thumb|190px|Democrats protested the war they started. [[North Vietnam]]ese and Cuban communist flags can be seen in the image.]]&lt;br /&gt;
After the chaos of the 1968 Democratic National Convention, where [[Hubert Humphrey]] did not appear on any primary ballot but took the nomination amid protests and riots, the Democratic party attempted to reform its nomination process. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the assassination of [[Robert Kennedy]] who was a leading critic of [[President Johnson]]'s war policy, Humphrey was regarded as a war hawk who would continue President Johnson's [[Vietnam War]] policy. Johnson dropped out of the race due to growing unpopularity of himself and the war.  Sen. [[George McGovern]] made himself heir of Bobby Kennedy's dovish stance. Most states at the time used closed caucuses and state conventions, controlled by New Deal segregationist  “party regulars” and insiders to select national delegates. Machine caucuses in several states accumulated enough delegates for Humphrey to win nomination without appearing on any primary ballot. In the aftermath of the loss to [[Richard Nixon]], Humphrey agreed to a reform commission and appointed one of his lieutenants, Donald Fraser, to co-chair the [[McGovern-Fraser Commission]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chairman George McGovern wanted to &amp;quot;open up&amp;quot; the process of delegate selection and strip figures like [[Chicago]] Mayor [[Richard J. Daley]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gj9TkjL87Rk Ribicoff vs Daley at the Democratic Convention 1968] youtube.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of their ability to select delegates for the upcoming 1972 convention. Daley felt particularly betrayed, having stuffed the ballot box for the Democrats and the Kennedy's to rob Richard Nixon of the presidency in 1960,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=425967 Did Daley rob Nixon of the Presidency in 1960?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to then be accused by [[liberal]] Democrats of &amp;quot;gestapo tactics&amp;quot; in the streets of Chicago.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
McGovern was critical of the insider establishment's way of choosing a nominee and wanted to switch over to primaries. Donald Fraser was a lieutenant in the [http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttsfmc Humphrey &amp;amp; Mondale Democratic Farmer-Labor (DFL) machine] which dominated [[Minnesota]] where caucuses are popular. So a compromise was sought.  The general feeling was that party insiders such as Mayor Daley and Southern Democrat bosses controlled too much power and through state party caucuses and conventions were able to impose their candidates on a national convention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after [[Sen. Richard Russell]]'s passing, the Democrat Senate renamed the Senate Office Building the Russell Office Building in commemoration of the man who was instrumental in their fight to keep [[segregation]] alive during his five decades of leadership in the Democrat party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Desegregation: the McGovern/Biden era===&lt;br /&gt;
In [[Nixon]]'s landslide 49 state re-election of 1972, [[Massachusetts]] was the only state that remained solidly in the Democratic camp. Black parents filed a desegregation lawsuit the same year, and the [[NAACP]] argued the case. According to ''Politico'', nowhere did the sentiment of people opposed to desegregation play out more dramatically than in [[Boston]]. In mid 1974, a federal judge found that 20 years after ''Brown v. Board'', Boston officials deliberately kept the schools segregated, and that the city must integrate at once. He drew up a busing plan. Black students from Roxbury would attend South Boston High School, while Irish Americans from Southie would board buses to Roxbury.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The first buses rolled through Boston in September 1974—and racial violence engulfed the city. White mobs hurled bricks at school buses with terrified black children inside. Then, on October 7, a [[Haiti]]an immigrant was beaten savagely by a white mob in South Boston. In the coming months, the list of casualties would grow. The city became a cauldron of racial hatred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each year after passage of the 1965 Civil Rights Act up until 1977, the Democratic controlled House passed at least one new law designed to restrain school integration—often in the guise of anti-busing legislation. Until 1974, the Senate rejected those bills. But as white resistance to busing escalated in many cities across the country, the House Democrats anti-busing majority began to pull more Democratic senators to their side.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1975, Sen. [[Joseph Biden]] proposed an amendment that gutted Title VI of the [[1964 Civil Rights Act]], which enabled the federal government to cut off funding to school districts that refused to integrate. ''[[Politico]]'' writes of the whole sordid affair, {{quotebox|Biden morphed into a leading anti-busing crusader—all the while continuing to insist that he supported the goal of school desegregation, he only opposed busing as the means to achieve that end. This stance, which many of Biden’s liberal and moderate colleagues also held, was clever but disingenuous. It enabled Biden to choose votes over principles, while acting as if he was not doing so....In a seminal moment, the Senate thus turned against desegregation. The Senate had supported the 1964 Civil Rights Act, [[1965 Voting Rights Act]] and 1968 Fair Housing Act....the Senate remained the last bastion for those who supported strong integration policies. Biden stormed that bastion...&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;politico.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/joe-biden-integration-school-busing-120968_full.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} A Boston NAACP leader said, “An anti-busing amendment is an anti-desegregation amendment, and an anti-desegregation amendment is an anti-black amendment.” Republican Sen. [[Edward Brooke]], the first black senator ever to be directly elected, called Biden's amendment “the greatest symbolic defeat for [[civil rights]] since 1964.”  Brooke accused Biden of leading an assault on integration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Voter suppression====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Democratic voter suppression.jpg|left|300px|thumb|Democratic voter suppression, 1963.]] &lt;br /&gt;
The McGovern-Fraser Commission required state parties to develop written rules and post uniform statewide notification of the date, time, and location of precinct caucus meetings or party primary elections. There was a common practice in some Southern states such as Mississippi were all-white local party bosses held meetings in obscure locations so that Black majorities in a county or district were unaware of the time and place of party elections. Although many provisions the commission brought about were undone in the early 1980s by Walter Mondale and Ted Kennedy, several provisions have remained. Prior to McGovern-Fraser, several states had no written guidelines governing party conventions, caucuses, and the delegate selection process at each level, and were based mostly on local tradition, which often meant cronyism, discrimination, voter suppression and the boss's rule. The system had been used effectively by Democrats in their [[voter suppression]] of Blacks for over 100 years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Commission rewrote the rules to rig McGovern's nomination. The 1972 Credentials Committee at the convention under the McGovern-Fraser reforms replaced Daley's contingent of the [[Illinois]] delegation with a group sent by [[Jesse Jackson]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See U.S. Supreme Court ''[https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/419/477/ Cousins v. Wigoda]'', 419 U.S. 477 (1975)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and also replaced a delegation from [[Mississippi]] with another group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 1972 election, Congresswoman [[Barbara Mikulski]] was asked by the [[Democratic National Committee]] (DNC) to chair the [[Mikulski Commission]] to review and make recommendations on how effective the pre-convention McGovern-Fraser reforms rules were. According to [[CNN]], the commission&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|replaced the demographic quotas of 1972 with [[affirmative action]] requirements to increase participation by women, blacks and other minorities. (However, this specific plan had the OPPOSITE effect, decreasing the proportion of women from 38% in 1972 to 36% in 1976. The proportion of blacks declined from 15% in 1972 to 7% in 1976. After 1976, quotas for women delegates were reimposed.) PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION, the distribution of delegates among candidates to reflect their share of the primary or caucus vote, was mandated by party rules.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1996/conventions/chicago/facts/rules/index.shtml All Politics, CNN Time, Facts.] Sources: ‘’The National Journal’’, August 23, 1980; ‘’Congressional Quarterly's Guide to U.S. Elections’’; also quoted in  ‘’Democratic party convention rule changes’’, academic.regis.edu , below.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mikulski Commission went further than McGovern-Fraser, proposing to bind rules on state parties which would restrict delegate selection in primaries or caucuses to &amp;quot;Democratic voters only who publicly declare their [[party affiliation|party preference]] and have that preference publicly recorded&amp;quot; (Rule 2A). This required a party registration process before being able to vote in a Democratic primary. The new rule put pressure on parties to close their primaries to outside participation and brought about &amp;quot;same-day registration&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See for example Kansas rules. [https://www.sos.ks.gov/forms/elections/Voting_Rules_for_Primary_Elections.pdf Voting Rules for Primary Elections]. www.sos.ks.gov&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in states with open primaries mandated by state law. The DNC incorporated these recommendations into the Delegate Selection Rules for the 1976 Convention. A temporary exemption where state legislatures had no party identification requirement to participate in a primary election was included. Opponents and dissenters felt this new rule violated the integrity of the secret ballot at public polling stations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mikulski Commission did away with the secret ballot and required a public declaration in front of the election judges or on registration forms and a party-specific ballot given to the voter to cast.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_elections_in_the_United_States#Types_of_primaries]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Now in most states a non-partisan primary voter who wishes to vote for a Democrat for President and a Republican for Senate experiences voter suppression and denial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biden Amendment repeal of portions of the Civil Rights Act====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Segregation|Systemic racism}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 1972 Delaware Sen. Joseph Biden re-cycled the [[John_C._Calhoun#positive good|racist rhetoric of John C. Calhoun]], arguing that school segregation was a &amp;quot;positive good&amp;quot; for Blacks.  Calhoun famously laid out his doctrine of separation of the races as a civilizing force among Blacks which became Democrat talking points before the [[Dred Scott]] decision, throughout the [[Civil War]], [[Reconstruction]], the [[Jim Crow]] era, and the [[New Deal]]. In a Democrat [[filibuster]] on the floor of the [[Senate]], Calhoun famously said:&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Biden segregation.png 1718483346.png|left|350px|thumb|Biden called segregation &amp;quot;a matter of Black pride&amp;quot; and pushed for a [[Constitutional Amendment]] to outlaw Court ordered de-segregation.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;politico.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/joe-biden-integration-school-busing-120968_full.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]] &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good—a positive good.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Biden resurrected the idea that segregation was &amp;quot;for their own good&amp;quot; and that Blacks were grateful for it.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|“I think the concept of busing … that we are going to [[integrate]] people so that they all have the same access and they learn to grow up with one another and all the rest, is a rejection of the whole movement of black pride, a rejection of the entire black awareness concept, where black is beautiful, black culture should be studied; and the cultural awareness of the importance of their own identity, their own individuality.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/read-the-transcript-of-the-october-1975-npr-interview-with-sens-joe-biden-and-edward-brooke&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
In the 21st century Biden tried to separate himself from his previous racist statements on school integration:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;Poor kids are just as smart as white kids.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Biden led a coalition of segregationists that was opposed by Republican Sen. [[Edward Brooke]], the first [[African American]] senator elected since Democrats forced the end of [[Reconstruction]] after the [[American Civil War|Civil War]]. National Public Radio's David Ensor asked Biden, &amp;quot;What about a constitutional amendment? Isn’t that what you’re gonna have to end up supporting if you want to stop court ordered busing, too?&amp;quot; Biden responded, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|&amp;quot;That would clearly do it. I’m hopeful, and I have — now that I have some sort of new allies in this area, it’s become respectable now for [[liberal]]s to at least say publicly what they’ve been saying in private, that busing doesn’t work. We are trying to figure out whether or not we can come up with an innovative piece of legislation which would limit the remedy, and I don’t — honestly don’t know whether we can come up with something constitutional. And if we can’t, I will not in an attempt to eliminate busing violate the Constitution. I won’t do that. The only way, if I’m gonna go at it, I’m gonna go at it through a Constitutional Amendment if it can’t be done through a piece of legislation.&amp;quot;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Ensor reported that Biden proposed renewing segregation because busing &amp;quot;wasn't working&amp;quot; (&amp;quot;wasn't working&amp;quot; to the electoral advantage of Democrats and not necessarily to the cause of equal rights for Blacks), and Biden was afraid that older liberal colleagues were blind to how Black separatists felt about their children being bused to [[white]] schools. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Biden racial jungle.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Biden: &amp;quot;My children are going to grow up in a jungle, the jungle being a racial jungle.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/biden-racial-jungle-quote/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox-float|&amp;quot;There are those of we [[social experiment|social planner]]s who think somehow that if we just [[subrogate]] man’s individual characteristics and traits by making sure that a presently heterogeneous society becomes a totally homogeneous society, that somehow we’re going to solve our social ills. Quite to the contrary.&amp;quot;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Title VI of the [[1964 Civil Rights Act]] prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin in programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://quizlet.com/45411923/ethical-and-legal-issues-2-flash-cards/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1975, Biden authored an amendment to gut Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. ''[[Politico]]'' writes of the whole sordid affair, {{quotebox-float|Biden morphed into a leading anti-busing crusader—all the while continuing to insist that he supported the goal of school desegregation, he only opposed busing as the means to achieve that end. This stance, which many of Biden’s liberal and moderate colleagues also held, was clever but disingenuous. It enabled Biden to choose votes over principles, while acting as if he was not doing so....In a seminal moment, the Senate thus turned against desegregation. The Senate had supported the 1964 Civil Rights Act, [[1965 Voting Rights Act]] and 1968 Fair Housing Act....the Senate remained the last bastion for those who supported strong integration policies. Biden stormed that bastion...&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;politico.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/joe-biden-integration-school-busing-120968_full.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Sen. James Abourezk of [[South Dakota]] related how Biden reacted when Abrourezek tried to block the amendment: &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|‘Abourezk, you **********, if I ever vote for another one of your bills, it'll be a cold day in hell.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘Calm down, Joe,' I told him, ‘You're eventually gonna thank me for doing this.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘Like hell I will you dirty *******.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A few days later, Biden came into the scheduled committee meeting, this time with a broad, friendly grin aimed directly at me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘Jesus, Abourezk, you were right,' he said. ‘I am gonna thank you. You should see the Delaware newspapers—big front-page headlines saying, ‘Biden Battles Liberals in Washington.' He was unabashedly elated. ‘They love me back home, how did you know this would happen?'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/biden-exploded-at-dem-colleague-over-busing-called-him-dirty-bastard/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}  &lt;br /&gt;
''The New York Times'' published a lengthy story on Biden's advocacy of segregation.  In a 1977 congressional hearing related to anti-desegregation orders, Biden emphasized,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;Unless we do something about this, my children are going to grow up in a jungle, the jungle being a racial jungle.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/15/us/politics/biden-busing.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Republican Sen. [[Edward Brooke]], the first black senator ever to be popularly elected, called Biden's amendment “the greatest symbolic defeat for [[civil rights]] since 1964.”  Brooke accused Biden of leading an assault on integration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prof. Ronnie Dunn said opposition to busing was motivated by [[racism]] and that without the court-ordered policy Biden probably would not have become vice president in 2009. “What I find ironic is that [Biden] was the vice president under a president who, if it hadn’t been for the social interaction that occurred during the era of busing, I argue we likely would not have seen the election of Barack Obama.&amp;quot; Dunn, an Urban Studies professor at Cleveland State University and author of the book ''Boycotts, Busing, &amp;amp; Beyond'', said Biden made the case in favor of maintaining segregation. &amp;quot;That was an argument against desegregation.” Dunn said Biden must address the issue if he runs for president. “People have to be held accountable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/joe-biden-embraced-segregation-in-1975-claiming-it-was-a-matter-of-black-pride&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biden's opposition to integration didn't stop there. ''HuffPo'' reported: &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|In 1977, two black men nominated for key Justice Department posts by [[President Jimmy Carter]] easily won approval from the Senate Judiciary Committee. After confirmation by the full Senate, Drew Days III became the nation’s first black head of the department’s civil rights division and Wade McCree became the second black solicitor general. Only one member of the committee voted against them. It wasn’t segregationists [[Strom Thurmond]] (R-S.C.) or [[James Eastland]] (D-Miss.). It wasn’t even former [[Ku Klux Klan]] member [[Robert Byrd]] (D-W.Va.). The lone Judiciary Committee vote against the two men was Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joe-biden-busing-nominees_n_5ca3c03de4b03174b92904f7&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 1981 Biden said in a Senate hearing, “sometimes even [[George Wallace]] is right about some things.”  Wallace is famous for saying in 1963, “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/07/09/biden-sometimes-even-george-wallace-is-right/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Biden read  the &amp;quot;N&amp;quot; word into the Congressional Record during an open hearing in 1986.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/exclusive-newly-uncovered-transcripts-reveal-joe-biden-said-n-word-public-senate-hearing-1986/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In a farewell address to retiring Democrat segregationist Sen. John Stennis Biden said: &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|&amp;quot;To think that I would be one day on the floor of the United States Senate, being paid such accolades by such a man of character and courage as John Stennis is beyond my wildest dreams. And I mean that sincerely.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/9X6Y2CLqgDM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
When Biden announced his candidacy ''Politico'' attempted to poo-poo and explain away Biden and liberal Democrat racism with a back-handed slap at [[school vouchers]] for minority students, which liberal elites have strenuously opposed ever since the Biden Amendment passed: &lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox-float|School desegregation, as part of a broader suite of civil rights reforms, was once as a vital component of the Democratic Party platform. Yet since the 1970s, Democrats, in the face of concerted white backlash, have largely accommodated themselves to increasing segregation in public schools across the nation. Party leaders, even the most progressive among them, rarely propose serious solutions to this vexing problem. A sincere critique of Biden’s busing record would require a broader reckoning of the Democratic Party’s—and by extension the nation’s—abandonment of this central goal of the [[civil rights movement]]. And it’s hard to see that happening anytime soon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/05/05/joe-biden-busing-problem-226791&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Sen. [[Cory Booker]] of [[New Jersey]] condemned the [[2020 Democrat primary]] frontrunner at the [[Juneteenth]] annual commemoration of [[Republican]] [[Abraham Lincoln]] ending [[slavery]] in the United States. {{quotebox|You don’t joke about calling black men 'boys'...frankly, I’m disappointed that he hasn’t issued an immediate apology for the pain his words are dredging up for many Americans. He should.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;zerohedge.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-06-20/biden-doubles-down-after-reminding-everyone-democrats-owned-slaves&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Carter, stagflation and human rights===&lt;br /&gt;
More than four decades of [[Keynesian]]ism, deficit spending, and [[big government]] created an era of stagnant growth only kept afloat by the printing presses of the Federal Reserve Board. Each round of [[new spending]] by the Democratic Congress prompted the Federal Reserve to print more money, causing an increase in the cost of living, resulting in calls by Democrats for more government stimulus spending, more inflation, more price increases, higher costs, taxes on business and less new job creation. While wages and prices continued to spiral upward, no new jobs or increase in goods and services were created to meet the demands of a growing population.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic party split five ways in 1968 and became a minority party in presidential elections for decades; after 1964 they won a national majority of the popular presidential vote only in 2008.  However, the Democrats won a plurality of the popular vote in 1976, 1992, 1996 and 2000. after the fiasco and riot that was the 1968 convention, the [[McGovern-Fraser Commission]] was appointed to reform the nominating process. Sen. [[George McGovern]] of South Dakota used the commission to rig his own nomination in 1972. McGovern's forces at the national convention ousted Mayor [[Richard J. Daley]] and the entire Chicago delegation, replacing them with insurgents led by [[Jesse Jackson]]. After it became known that McGovern's running mate, Thomas Eagleton, had received psychiatric and electro-shock treatment, McGovern said he supported Eagleton &amp;quot;1000%&amp;quot; but he was soon forced to drop him and find a new running mate.  With his campaign stalled for several weeks, McGovern finally selected [[Sargent Shriver]], a Kennedy-in-law who was close to Mayor Daley.  On July 14, 1972, McGovern appointed his campaign manager, Jean Westwood as the first woman chair of the Democratic National Committee. McGovern emulated an earlier populist Plains preacher, William Jennings Bryan, with his antiwar sentiment and redistributive politics. He was defeated in a landslide by incumbent [[Richard Nixon]], winning only Massachusetts and Washington, D.C..  A Gallup Poll at the time revealed a staggering 33% of Democrats and 57% of blue-collar workers voted for  Nixon.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://presidentelect.org/art_cooper_e1972an.html An Interpretation of the 1972 Presidential Election Landslide], by CRAIG W. COOPER, 1975.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Watergate affair]] of 1973-74 made mistrust of government a central issue, especially after [[Gerald Ford]] pardoned Nixon in September 1974. Together with a bad economy, the Democrats made major gains in the 1974 off-year elections. Racism and segregation remained a common thread binding white Democrats together. In 1975, [[Delaware]] Sen. [[Joseph Biden]] led a coalition of liberals and former [[George Wallace]] supporters to oppose racial integration of schools, and went so far as to consider a [[Constitutional Amendment]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://soundcloud.com/user-391839060/npr-1975-interview-with-sen-joe-biden&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jimmy Carter.jpg|right|175px|thumb|[[Jimmy Carter]] was elected in 1976 and defeated in 1980.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1976 Ford was narrowly defeated by [[Jimmy Carter]], a former governor of Georgia. Carter represented the total outsider, who promised honesty in government. He had served as a naval officer, a farmer, a state senator, and a one-term governor. His only experience with federal politics was when he chaired the Democratic National Committee's congressional and gubernatorial elections in 1974. Carter's &amp;quot;consolidation&amp;quot; of governmental agencies resulted in the creation of two new cabinet-level bureaucracies, the [[United States Department of Energy]] and the [[United States Department of Education]]. Carter began deregulation of the trucking, airline, rail, finance, communications, and oil industries, raised [[social security]] taxes, and appointed record numbers of women and minorities to significant government and judicial posts, including [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] as head of the Great Society boondoogle, the Legal Service Corporation. He also enacted more environmental legislation, through the expansion of the [[National Park Service]] in [[Alaska]], adding 103 million acres of parkland. In foreign affairs, Carter negotiated the [[Camp David Accords]], the Panama Canal Treaties, the creation of full diplomatic relations with the [[People's Republic of China]], and the [[SALT II]] Treaty. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carter failed to implement national health care and raised Social Security taxes. The [[Congressional Black Caucus]] year after year submitted bills for the Martin Luther King holiday, but despite Democrat control of the House, Senate, and White House, their proposals were repeatedly rejected by racist Democrats. Not until Ronald Reagan and the Republican Senate of the 1980s was the holiday adopted. Stagflation with limited job opportunities were on the rise. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1980, Carter defeated liberal champion [[Edward Kennedy]] to gain renomination but lost to conservative [[Ronald Reagan]] by a landslide. The Democrats lost 12 Senate seats, and for the first time since 1954, the Republicans controlled the Senate.  The House, however, remained in Democratic hands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jimmy Carter was elected by campaigning on the Misery Index - adding the [[inflation]] rate and [[unemployment]] rate together, which then stood at 13.4%. By 1980 when Carter sought a second term, the Misery index ratcheted up to 21%. After &amp;quot;twelve years of neglect&amp;quot; as Bill Clinton referred to [[Reaganomics]] it in 1992, the Misery Index stood at 9.2%. Clinton's racist [[dogwhistling]] brought enough racist Democrats home to win a 42% plurality in a three-way contest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Progressive Kool-Aid drinkers====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Jim Jones and the Democrat party.jpg|left|400px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Progressivism|San Francisco values|Peoples Temple Agricultural Collective}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Willie Brown]], later mayor of [[San Francisco]] and [[Kamala Harris]]'s mentor, compared [[Jim Jones]] to [[Martin Luther King]] and [[Mahatma Gandhi]]. Brown endorsed Jones as “a close personal friend and a highly trusted brother in the [[National liberation struggle|struggle for liberation]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/op-eds/how-san-franciscos-democrats-made-jim-jones-and-then-made-his-memory-vanish&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Dianne Feinstein]] joined the rest of the San Francisco board of supervisors in honoring Jones “in recognition of his guidance and inspiration” in furthering “humanitarian programs.” Gov. [[Jerry Brown]] spoke at the [[People's Temple]]. At its peak, the Temple boasted 20,000 members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the San Francisco mayoral election of 1975, the San Francisco District Attorney asked Timothy Stoen, a Temple member,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Lindsay, Robert 1978&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lindsay, Robert. &amp;quot;How Rev. Jim Jones Gained His Power Over Followers.&amp;quot; ''New York Times''. 26 November 1978.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to lead a special unit to investigate [[election fraud]] charges.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taylor, Michael, &amp;quot;Jones Captivated S.F.'s Liberal Elite&amp;quot;, San Francisco Chronicle, November 12, 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Shortly thereafter Stoen was hired as an assistant district attorney.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reiterman, Tim and John Jacobs. ''Raven (book)|Raven: The Untold Story of Rev. Jim Jones and His People''. Dutton, 1982. ISBN|0-525-24136-1. p. 270.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kinsolving, Kathleen and Tom. [http://www.culteducation.com/reference/jonestown/jonestown43.html &amp;quot;Madman in Our Midst: Jim Jones and the California Cover Up.&amp;quot;]  1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Stoen found no evidence of fraud, but Temple members later alleged that the Temple brought &amp;quot;busloads&amp;quot; of members from Redwood Valley who were not registered to vote in San Francisco, to vote in the San Francisco election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Crewdson, John, &amp;quot;Followers Say Jim Jones Directed Voting Frauds&amp;quot;, New York Times, December 16, 1978&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was Willie Brown who brought George Moscone and Jim Jones together.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reiterman, Tim, and John Jacobs. ''Raven (book)|Raven: The Untold Story of Rev. Jim Jones and His People''. Dutton, 1982. ISBN|978-0-525-24136-2. page 266.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.brasscheck.com/jonestown/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Moscone, who owed his position as mayor to Jones in a tight race, appointed Jones chairman of the city's Housing Commission Authority, effectively making Jones the city's largest landlord. Moscone's press secretary stated that Jones &amp;quot;made his followers available to support [[progressive]] [[Democratic]] candidates.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Los Angeles Herald Examiner, &amp;quot;The Political Pull of Jim Jones&amp;quot;, November 21, 1978&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moscone's press spokesman explained it was &amp;quot;common knowledge that if you were going to run for office in San Francisco, and your constituency included the black, the young or the poor, you'd better have Jones in your corner.&amp;quot; Of particular interest to politicians was the Temple's ability to produce 2,000 people for campaign work or attendance at an event with only six hours notice.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Lindsay, Robert 1978&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Moscone's aide stated that Jones offered thousands of &amp;quot;foot soldiers&amp;quot; willing to walk precincts and get out the vote, which was &amp;quot;an offer no politician in his right mind could refuse.&amp;quot; Similarly, San Francisco Mayor Art Agnos stated that &amp;quot;If you were having a rally for a presidential candidate, you needed to fill up the crowd, you could always get busloads from Jim Jones' church.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richardson, James, [http://www.escholarship.org/editions/view?docId=ft0m3nb07q;brand=ucpress ''Willie Brown A Biography''], University of California Press, 1996, p. 250  {{webarchive|url=https://www.webcitation.org/5vybRDHsI?url=http://www.escholarship.org/editions/view?docId=ft0m3nb07q;brand=ucpress |date=January 24, 2011 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The chairman of the county Democratic Central Committee, the governing body of the Democratic Party in San Francisco, referred to the Temple as &amp;quot;a ready-made volunteer workforce,&amp;quot; and Jones was &amp;quot;a man who touched a component of the consensus power forces in the city, such as labor and ethnicity groups....here was a guy who could provide workers for causes progressives cared about.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taylor, Michael, &amp;quot;Jones Captivated S.F.'s Liberal Elite&amp;quot;, San Francisco Chronicle, November 12, 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Herb Caen, a [[Pulitzer Prize]] winner for the ''San Francisco Chronicle'', acted as a hype-generator for Jim Jones and the Peoples Temple. [[Jane Fonda]] joined other celebrities in expressing that she was “familiar with the work of Reverend Jones and Peoples Temple and have no hesitancy in commending them for their example in setting a high standard of [[ethics]] and [[morality]].” &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones, Jim. [http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=27309 &amp;quot;Transcript of Recovered FBI tape Q 1023.&amp;quot;] ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego State University. {{cite web |url=http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/AboutJonestown/Tapes/Tapes/TapeTranscripts/Q1023.html |title=Archived copy |accessdate=|deadurl=bot: unknown |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/5wTIpY0di?url=http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/AboutJonestown/Tapes/Tapes/TapeTranscripts/Q1023.html |archivedate=2019-01-30|df= }} The concept often loosely mixed tenets of socialism. The Temple openly preached to established members that &amp;quot;religion is an opiate to the people.&amp;quot; (Jones, Jim. [http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=27318 &amp;quot;Transcript of Recovered FBI tape Q 1053.&amp;quot;] ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego State University.) Accordingly, &amp;quot;those who remained drugged with the opiate of religion had to be brought to enlightenment{{spaced ndash}}socialism.&amp;quot; (Layton 1999, page 53). In that regard, Jones also openly stated that he &amp;quot;took the church and used the church to bring people to atheism.&amp;quot; (Jones, Jim. [http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=27580 &amp;quot;Transcript of Recovered FBI tape Q 757.&amp;quot;] ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego State University). Jones often mixed those concepts, such as preaching that &amp;quot;If you're born in this church, this socialist revolution, you're not born in sin. If you're born in capitalist America, racist America, fascist America, then you're born with a big d***o in sin. But if you're born in socialism, you're not born in sin.&amp;quot;(Jones, Jim. [http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=27318 &amp;quot;Transcript of Recovered FBI tape Q 1053.&amp;quot;] ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego State University.) {{cite web |url=http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/AboutJonestown/Tapes/Tapes/TapeTranscripts/Q757.html |title=Archived copy |accessdate=|deadurl=bot: unknown |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/5wTIqQUvL?url=http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/AboutJonestown/Tapes/Tapes/TapeTranscripts/Q757.html |archivedate=2019-01-30|df= }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Peoples Temple and the [[Nation of Islam]] held a joint event in the Los Angeles Convention Center in 1976 . Thousands packed the Civic Center. Two time [[CPUSA]] [[Vice President]]ial candidate [[Angela Davis]], along with the Lieutenant Governor and Los Angeles mayor Tom Bradley attended the event. In speaking at the event Jones stated &amp;quot;We are grateful for this symbolic merging of our two movements . . . If the Peoples Temple and the Nation of Islam can get together, anyone can.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Rosalynn Carter]] called Jones at candidate Jimmy Carter's behest. She held a private dinner with him and had the Peoples Temple leader introduce her at the 1976 grand opening of the San Francisco Democratic Party Headquarters. Jimmy Carter's running mate, Walter Mondale, met with Jones on the tarmac in San Francisco during the campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;When Deputy Minister Ptolemy Reid traveled to Washington, D.C. in September 1977 to sign the [[Panama Canal Treaties]], Mondale asked him, &amp;quot;How's Jim?&amp;quot;, which indicated to Reid that Mondale had a personal interest in Jones' well being, p. 173.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Moore, Rebecca. [http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=16581 ''American as Cherry Pie''] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141029130010/http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=16581 |date=October 29, 2014 }}, Jonestown Institute, San Diego State University&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Jones dined with Rosalynn Carter at the head table at the Democratic National Convention.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Layton, Deborah. ''Seductive Poison''. Anchor, 1999. ISBN|978-0-385-48984-. p. 53.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jones wrote to Carter requesting aid for [[Fidel Castro]], whom Jones had earlier met with in [[Cuba]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Reiterman, Tim, and John Jacobs. ''Raven (book)|Raven: The Untold Story of Rev. Jim Jones and His People''. Dutton, 1982. ISBN|978-0-525-24136-2. page 305.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In a handwritten letter to Jones on White House stationery, the [[First Lady]] wrote &amp;quot;Your comments on Cuba have been helpful.  I hope your suggestion can be acted on in the near future.&amp;quot;  Carter also wrote that &amp;quot;I enjoyed being with you during the campaign -- and do hope you can meet Ruth soon&amp;quot;, referring to her sister-in-law, Ruth Carter Stapleton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;LA Times November 21, 1978&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mondale stated regarding the Temple that &amp;quot;knowing the congregations deep involvement in the major social and constitutional issues of our country . . . is a great inspiration to me.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;First Lady Among Cult's References&amp;quot; {{cite news|work=Los Angeles Times |title=First Lady Among Cult's References; Mondale and Califano also listed |date= November 21, 1978}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Health and Human Services]] Secretary Joseph Califano stated &amp;quot;your humanitarian principles and your interest in protecting individual liberty and freedom have made an outstanding contribution to furthering the cause of human dignity.&amp;quot; President Carter sent a representative to a dinner at the Temple at which Jones and Gov. Jerry Brown spoke.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mehren, Elizabeth, &amp;quot;Politicians Defend Associations With Jones&amp;quot;, Oakland Tribune, November 21, 1978&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jones procured land in [[Guyana]] where nearly 1,000 of his followers settled in Jonestown, clearing the land, planting crops, and listening to him preach the gospel according to [[Karl Marx]]. “I call [[capitalism]] the [[devil]],” Jones said from the pulpit, “and [[socialism]] is [[God]].” A former member of the Indianapolis Human Rights Commission, Jones often quoted Marx's dictum, &amp;quot;From each as he is able, to each according to his need.&amp;quot;  One member said the Temple moved to Jonestown because &amp;quot;what we saw in the United States was creeping [[fascism]]. It was apparent that corporations, or the multinationals, were getting much larger, their influence was growing within the government, and the United States is a racist place.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tim Carter. [http://www.opb.org/radio/archives/2007/04/there_was_no_ch_1.php ''There was no choice in Jonestown that day...'']  {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070426000000/http://www.opb.org/radio/archives/2007/04/there_was_no_ch_1.php |date=April 26, 2007 }} Oregon Public Broadcasting Radio interview. 9 April 2007. {{cite web |url=http://www.opb.org/radio/archives/2007/04/there_was_no_ch_1.php |title=Archived copy |accessdate=|deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/5wTJ4uKgA?url=http://www.opb.org/radio/archives/2007/04/there_was_no_ch_1.php |archivedate=2019-01-30|df= }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to $65,000 in monthly [[welfare]] payments from [[New Deal]] and [[Great Society]] programs to Jonestown residents were signed over to the Temple.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Harvnb|Layton|1998|p=103}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Officials from the U.S. embassy in Georgetown interviewed [[Social Security]] recipients on multiple occasions to inquire if they were being held against their will.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pear, Richard. &amp;quot;State Explains Response to Cult Letters.&amp;quot; ''Washington Star News''. November 26, 1978.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; None of the 75 people interviewed, according to the embassy, said they were being held captive, were forced to sign over welfare checks, or wanted to leave Jonestown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wessinger, Catherine. ''How the Millennium Comes Violently: From Jonestown to Heaven's Gate''. 2000. ISBN|978-1-889119-24-3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Civil rights lawyers Charles Garry and Mark Lane, who represented [[James Earl Ray]], depicted Jonestown as a paradise and aggressively defended Jones in the media. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As reports seeped back of people who wanted to leave Guyana, [[Harvey Milk]] –  the first openly gay elected official who was endorsed by the Temple for San Francisco city councilman – wrote a letter to President Jimmy Carter defending Jones &amp;quot;as a man of the highest character,&amp;quot; and stating that Temple defectors were trying to &amp;quot;damage Rev. Jones' reputation&amp;quot; with &amp;quot;apparent bold-faced lies&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Milk, Harvey [http://www.brasscheck.com/jonestown/milk.jpg ''Letter Addressed to President Jimmy Carter, Dated February 19, 1978''] {{Webarchive|url=https://www.webcitation.org/5vybbC0i4?url=http://www.brasscheck.com/jonestown/milk.jpg |date=January 24, 2011 }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Temple claimed that &amp;quot;reactionary forces were trying to destroy his [Jones] image because he is the most persistent [[Social justice warrior|fighter for social justice]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Peoples Temple, [http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/3VictimConspirBrochure.pdf ''Victims of Conspiracy Brochure''], Jonestown Alternative Considerations, San Diego State University {{cite web |url=http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/AboutJonestown/JTResearch/opposition/3VictimConspirBrochure.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2019-01-31 |deadurl=bot: unknown |archiveurl=https://www.webcitation.org/5vybVUjVl?url=http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/AboutJonestown/JTResearch/opposition/3VictimConspirBrochure.pdf |archivedate=January 24, 2011 |df= }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:The Jimmy Carter Jonestown Massacre.jpg|left|350px|thumb|'''Socialist paradise in Guyana.''' Lack of beef and living off of jungle plants is said to have added to the mass irrationality. Its leader, a community organizer named Jim Jones, was very active in Democratic party politics.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Russian dignitary Feodor Timofeyev visited Jonestown for two days to gave a speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones, Jim. [http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=27428 &amp;quot;Transcript of Recovered FBI tape Q 352.&amp;quot;] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304094827/http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=27428 |date=March 4, 2016 }} ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego State University.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jones introduced him saying, &amp;quot;For many years, we have let our sympathies be quite publicly known, that the United States government was not our mother, but that the Soviet Union was our spiritual motherland.&amp;quot; Timofeyev opened the speech stating that the [[Soviet Union]] would like to send &amp;quot;our deepest and the most sincere greetings to the people of this first socialist and communist community of the United States of America, in Guyana and in the world&amp;quot;. Both speeches were met by cheers and applause. Angela Davis addressed the crowd by shortwave radio saying, &amp;quot;when you are attacked, it is because of your progressive stand, and we feel that it is directly an attack against us as well.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|title=Statement of Angela Davis (Text)|url=http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/?page_id=19027|publisher=Alternative Considerations of Jonestown &amp;amp; Peoples Temple|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hearing allegations of abuse, Congressman [[Leo J. Ryan]] led a fact-finding mission to [[Jonestown]] which included in his group a staff member and future congresswoman, [[Jackie Speier]]. Ryan and four others were murdered when they attempted to leave. After the killings, Jones herded his followers into the camp's main pavilion and ordered them all to drink [[cyanide]]-laced Kool-Aid. 909 bodies, including 304 children, were found by Guyana police in following days. Some of the bodies had gunshot wounds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three survivors claimed they were given an assignment before the suicides began. They were given luggage containing $550,000 in U.S. currency, $130,000 in Guyanese currency, and an envelope, which they were told to deliver to the Soviet embassy in Georgetown, Guyana. The envelope contained two [[passport]]s and three instructional letters, the first of which was to Timofeyev, stating: &lt;br /&gt;
:''Dear Comrade Timofeyev,&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The following is a letter of instructions regarding all of our assets that we want to leave to the Communist Party of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Enclosed in this letter are letters which instruct the banks to send the cashiers checks to you. I am doing this on behalf of Peoples Temple because we, as communists, want our money to be of benefit for help to [[oppression|oppressed peoples]] all over the world, or in any way that your decision-making body sees fit.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/letter_toFeodorTimofeyev.pdf &amp;quot;Letter to Feodor Timofeyev.&amp;quot;] {{Webarchive|url=https://www.webcitation.org/5ryfcXgSk?url=http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/AboutJonestown/PrimarySources/financialLetters/letter_toFeodorTimofeyev.pdf |date=August 14, 2010 }} ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego State University.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The letters included listed accounts with balances totaling in excess of $7.3 million to be transferred to the [[Communist Party of the Soviet Union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/AnnieMcGowan_1.pdf &amp;quot;Letter from Annie McGowan.&amp;quot;] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205012201/http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/AnnieMcGowan_1.pdf |date=February 5, 2015 }} ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego State University.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/AnnieMcGowan_2.pdf &amp;quot;Another Letter from Annie McGowan.&amp;quot;] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150205014539/http://jonestown.sdsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/AnnieMcGowan_2.pdf |date=February 5, 2015 }} ''Alternative Considerations of Jonestown and Peoples Temple''. Jonestown Project: San Diego State University.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jonestown was the greatest loss of American civilian lives in a non-natural disaster until the [[September 11, 2001 attacks]]. Progressivism suffered a devastating blow in the eyes of most Americans. Not until the rise of Barack Obama did it recover.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Human rights and the Ayatollah Khomeini====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Iran.jpg|thumb|198px|right|Carter's shift away from anti-communism to supposed &amp;quot;human rights&amp;quot; as the focus of U.S. [[foreign policy]] brought the [[Ayatollah Khomeini]] to power, and the enlistment of child soldiers - some as young as 4 years old - to clear minefields for the Iranian Army. Iran, once a U.S. ally, now pursues nuclear weapons.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Abroad, for the first time since Harry Truman, Carter shifted the focus of U.S. foreign policy from Russia to &amp;quot;human rights.&amp;quot; The [[Shah of Iran]] came to power in 1941 and was an ally of Western powers in the war against [[Adolf Hitler]]. During the [[Six Day War]] in 1967, the Shah aided Israel by keeping [[Saddam Hussein]] out of the war. The Shah did not participate in the 1973 [[Yom Kippur War]] or [[OPEC]] oil embargo. He had been a loyal Western ally in the [[Cold War]] for the better part of four decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carter supported the [[Ayatollah Khomeini]] over the Shah of Iran whom Soviet intelligence and Western media portrayed as a greedy capitalist oppressor. William Miller, chief of staff on the US Senate Intelligence Committee, said America had nothing to fear from Khomeini since he would be a [[Progressivism|progressive]] force for human rights. U.S. Ambassador William Sullivan compared Khomeini to [[Mahatma Gandhi]]. The mainstream media and State Department called him the &amp;quot;Iranian Mandela.&amp;quot;  The fall of the Shah and rise of the [[Islamic Republic of Iran]] set back [[women's rights]] centuries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once installed under Carter's human right's policy, the Ayatollah created the ''Basij Mostazafan'', a movement of young people under age 17.  When the Iran-Iraq War started in 1980, Khomeini issued a promise of paradise to the children and they were incorporated into the Iranian military. The Iranian clergy called for the young people from age 9 years old and up to move forward in human wave attacks, to clear minefields so the regular Army could pass.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/iran-iraq.htm Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), ''Iraqi Retreats, 1982-84''], Globalsecruity.org, retrieved 20 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Matthias Küntzel quotes an Iraqi officer's description of one such encounter in the summer of 1982.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''“They come toward our positions in huge hordes with their fists swinging...You can shoot down the first wave and then the second. But at some point the corpses are piling up in front of you, and all you want to do is scream and throw away your weapon.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.matthiaskuentzel.de/contents/ahmadinejads-demons ''Ahmadinejad's Demons: A Child of the Revolution Takes Over''], Matthias Küntzel, The New Republic, 24 April 2006 .&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other reports appeared in the Iranian daily newspaper, ''Ettelaat'', and later an eyewitness gave an account to the German newspaper ''Frankfurter Allgemeine'' in 2002.  Some 100,000 children were killed fulfilling Carter's human rights policy this way.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Iranian students attacked the American embassy in [[Teheran]] and took Americans hostage for 444 days. The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in late 1979 and the progressive Kool-Aid drinkers weakened the perception Americans had of Carter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Carter was forced to admit his error in downplaying the focus on Russian intentions in January 1980 with his [[Carter Doctrine]], declaring the Persian Gulf a vital [[national security]] interest which was later used as the long-standing [[foreign policy]] basis of the 1992 [[Gulf War]] and the 2003 [[Iraq War]]. The loss of the Shah as an ally in 1979 led to the rise of the [[theocratic]] Iranian Islamic Republic, the world's leading state sponsor of terror. The Islamic Republic's pursuit of nuclear weapons would become a lingering problem for the United States in coming decades and the early 21st century.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Battling Raygun===&lt;br /&gt;
Carter was re-nominated in 1980.  In a spirit of unity Willie Nelson, who later hit the top of the ''Billboard'' charts with a song celebrating public lynchings,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://psmag.com/news/country-hits-are-getting-more-misogynistic-according-to-new-research?fbclid=IwAR0L2NbDN6gHqxr8vnsjPyB6GZFuMbUxIjh-k9uFn74tSrvx9y-U_xc_OAk|title=COUNTRY HITS INCREASINGLY OBJECTIFY WOMEN AND GLORIFY WHITENESS|last=Jacobs|first=Tom|date=May 7, 2019|website=Pacific Standard|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; sang the national anthem at the Democratic National Convention. Instrumental in the election of Republican [[Ronald Reagan]], were many who felt abandoned by the Democrats embrace of socialism. Among legislators, one of the most prominent of these conservative Democrats was Georgia congressman and second chairman of the [[John Birch Society]], [[Larry McDonald]], who was a passenger on [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]] shot down by the Soviets near [[Moneron Island]] on September 1, 1983. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Carter mondale 1200.JPG|right|300px|thumb|Democratic nominee Walter Mondale on the campaign trail with Jimmy Carter in 1984.]] To oppose Reagan, Senate Democrats elected the [[Exalted Cyclops]] of Ku Klux Klan, Sen. [[Robert Byrd]] to lead them. Byrd once wrote,  {{quotebox|&amp;quot;I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side. … Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ocregister.com/2012/05/09/walter-williams-most-racists-were-democrats/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;Reagan Democrats&amp;quot;  were Democrats before the Reagan years, and afterward, but they voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 and 1984 (and for [[George H. W. Bush]] in 1988), producing landslide victories.  Jesse Jackson became the first African-American to win states in a major party primary election for president in 1984. But vote rigging by [[Superdelegate]]s at the convention sabotaged his efforts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/1984/05/20/us/disparity-between-jackson-s-vote-and-delegate-count-vexes-party.html DISPARITY BETWEEN JACKSON'S VOTE AND DELEGATE COUNT VEXES PARTY], by DAVID E. ROSENBAUM, ''New York Times'', May 20, 1984.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Reagan Democrats were mostly white ethnics in the Northeast who were attracted to Reagan on issues such as jobs, abortion, and his strong foreign policy. Stanley Greenberg, a Democratic pollster analyzed white ethnic voters, largely unionized auto workers, in suburban Macomb County, Michigan, just north of Detroit. The county voted 63 percent for Kennedy in 1960 and 66 percent for Reagan in 1984. Restrictive oil drilling, high energy prices, unrestricted Japanese auto imports, and 17% auto loans caused by federal deficits and inflation destroyed their jobs. Greenberg concluded that many working families no longer saw Democrats as champions of their interests.  Bill Clinton resuscitated racist dog whistles with considerable success in 1992 and 1996. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The global warming hoax to counter capitalism====&lt;br /&gt;
Democratic party leaders, officially and unofficially, [[collude]]d with the [[KGB]] to interfere in American elections and affect U.S. [[foreign policy]]. A 1983 KGB memo&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sweetness-light.com/archive/kgb-letter-details-ted-kennedys-offer-to-help-ussr Kennedy collusion with the KGB].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; describes a meeting between former KGB officials and former Democratic Sen. John Tunney (Sen. Kennedy's confidant) in Moscow. Tunney asked the KGB to convey a message to [[Yuri Andropov]], the Soviet leader, proposing a campaign in which Kennedy would visit [[Moscow]] to offer talking points to Andropov and Soviet officials on how to attack Reagan's policies to U.S. audiences. According to the memo, Kennedy, through the intermediary, offered to help facilitate a media tour in a proposed visit by Andropov to the United States.  Kennedy's hope was to hurt Reagan politically on foreign policy at a time when the economic recovery was working in his favor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=30980  Jamie Glazov; ''Ted Kennedy and the KGB'' FrontPageMagazine.com (Thursday, May 15, 2008)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ted and Brezhnev.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|Sen. Ted Kennedy colluding with Soviet Premier Leonid Brezhnev to interfere in the 1984 Presidential election.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, 10 Democratic lawmakers — including the House Democratic Majority Leader and Intelligence Committee chairman – sent a letter to Nicaraguan Communist leader [[Daniel Ortega]] known as the &amp;quot;Dear Comandante&amp;quot; letter. In it, the lawmakers criticized Reagan's policy toward [[Nicaragua]] and whitewashed the record of violence and murder by the [[Sandinista]] communists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/5-times-democrats-undermined-republican-presidents-with-foreign-governments&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Bernie Sanders]] was a frequent visitor to Nicaragua at this time, singing the praises of communism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to Reagan's defense build-up and missile defense initiative,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/nuclear-winter/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which bankrupted the Soviet Union and ended the specter of Mutually Assured Destruction, many Democrats adopted the [[KGB]] line of a nuclear freeze and [[global warming]] targeting America's manufacturing and economic base. [[Barack Obama]] expounded the [[Brezhnev]] era doctrine in an essay entitled ''Breaking The War Mentality'' published in Columbia University's weekly magazine, ''The Sun Dial.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://2012election.procon.org/sourcefiles/obama-article-sun-dial-columbia-breaking-war-mentality.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Anti-capitalists in the United States and Europe began attacking the booming auto manufacturing,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;The legacy of the global [[Cold War]] economy can be seen in that the loosers of [[World War II]] - [[Germany]] and [[Japan]] - as of 2019 remain the world's largest auto manufactures. Germany and Japan were allowed to rebuild their economies around the automobile - provided the two refrained from competing in the global aircraft industry. World War II proved the military doctrine of the superiority of airpower - whoever controls the skies controls the ground. While Germany and Japan do produce aircraft, including military aircraft, it is strictly for their domestic markets and not for export. Germany and Japan certainly have the manufacturing and technical capabilities to compete with Boeing, AirBus, Northrup Grumman and others, but by previous trade agreements are prohibited. By contrast, the United States, [[UK]], [[France]], [[Italy]] and others have ceded much of their domestic auto markets to German and Japanese manufactures. The fraud of the global warming hoax can be seen in the disproportionate lack of pressure on Germany and Japan to cease auto exports, as has been applied throughout the rest of the West.&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; oil drilling and refining industries as responsible for the destruction of the planet. The Soviet [[KGB]], known for its [[propaganda]] campaigns such as the [[AIDS]] virus invented by the [[Pentagon]],  mounted one last ditch effort to save [[communism]] and fight [[capitalism]]. This [[leftwing]] socialist sentiment was taught in schools and universities, where faculty salaries are dependent on [[statist]] largesse. These Russian-manufactured hoaxes on [[climate change]] were widely embraced by public sector unions in schools and universities to argue against cuts to [[Great Society]] programs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a limited way, the communists were successful; the global warming scare was a factor in the de-industrialization and transfer of Western factories to the [[Third World|developing world]] where environmental and labor laws were less strict. The [[free trade]] movement and [[globalization]] was partly justified by the politization of science and global warming.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====As the South became less racist, it became more Republican====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:2000px-ElectoralCollege1980.png|left|thumb|325px|Reagan's 1980 landslide|By 1980, racism ebbed in the Old South as the South began voting like much of the rest of the country. Only the staunchest Democrat racist areas held out. The Republicans then passed the Martin Luther King Holiday, which the Democrat Congress and Jimmy Carter repeatedly rejected.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the century after the Republicans efforts for Black equality and the end of [[Reconstruction]] in 1877, the white South identified with the Democratic Party. The Democrats' lock on power was so strong, the region was called the [[Solid South]]. The Republicans only controlled parts of the Appalachian mountains, but they sometimes did compete for statewide office in the border states. Before Lyndon Johnson's [[War on Poverty]] - an effort to extend big government social spending on Blacks which the New Deal failed to do&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/rLMh3O-4aNA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; - the southern Democrats saw their party as the defender of the southern way of life, which included a respect for states' rights and an appreciation for traditional southern &amp;quot;values&amp;quot; (including [[segregation]] of blacks). They repeatedly warned against the aggressive designs of Republicans and Northern liberals, as well as civil rights activists whom they denounced as &amp;quot;outside agitators.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, between 1928 and 2004, the Democratic Party's lock on the South was broken.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/UiprVX4os2Y&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The long-term cause had to do with the South becoming more like the rest of the nation. It could no longer stand apart in terms of racial segregation.  Modernization had brought factories, national businesses, and larger, more [[cosmopolitan]] cities to the South, as well as millions of migrants from the North and more opportunities for higher education. Meanwhile, the cotton and tobacco economy of the traditional rural South faded away, as former farmers commuted to factory jobs. As the South became less racist, it became more Republican.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Integration and the civil rights movement caused enormous controversy in the white South, with many attacking it as a violation of states' rights.  When segregation was outlawed by Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices and by the [[bi-partisan]] Civil Rights acts of 1964 and 1965, a die-hard element of Democrats resisted integration, led by Democrats [[Orval Faubus]] of Arkansas, [[Lester Maddox]] of Georgia, [[Al Gore, Sr.]] of Tennessee, [[J. William Fulbright]] of Arkansas and [[George Wallace]] of Alabama. These racists appealed to a less-educated, blue-collar electorate that on economic grounds favored [[New Deal]] [[white privilege]] and opposed desegregation. After 1965 most Southerners accepted integration, with the exception of public schools in an effort led by Sen. [[Joseph Biden]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;politico.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/joe-biden-integration-school-busing-120968_full.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Just as the Republican, Martin Luther King had promised, integration had brought about a new day in Southern politics, freeing both blacks and whites from old hatreds and fears. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Johnson's [[big government]] giveaways and [[affirmative action]] programs attracted Blacks for the first time, and they began supporting Democratic candidates, producing leaders such as [[Julian Bond]] and [[John Lewis]] of Georgia, and Barbara Jordan of Texas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using issues of cultural conservatism, especially opposition to abortion and homosexuality and support for school prayer, Republicans attracted strong majorities among evangelical Christians. They were nationwide, but strongest in the South; before the 1980s they were largely apolitical.  Exit polls in 2004 showed that Bush led Kerry by 70-30% among Southern whites, who comprised 71% of the voters.  Kerry had a 90–9 lead among the 18% of Southern voters who were black. One third of the Southern voters said they were white evangelicals; they voted for Bush by 80–20%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See the exit polls at {{cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.3.html |date=2004-11-02\|accessdate=|title=U.S. PRESIDENT / REGION: SOUTH / EXIT POLL}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1988, the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), after decades of running their own presidential candidates, with the loss of Russian funding stopped running presidential candidates and has endorsed every Democratic presidential nominee since.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pjFfE1MNFk Communists, the Democrat Party and Snopes]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://aun-tv.com/2015/08/did-the-communist-party-usa-take-over-democratic-party-in-1988/ Did The Communist Party USA Take Over Democratic Party in 1988?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Since the end of the [[Cold War]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://youtu.be/JVkkLDAm8I4 KGB Bezmenov 1985 - Four Steps to Subversion of a Nation], youtube.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; communists began rising in Civil Service and elected office as Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://youtu.be/ZXLuqQe8DqQ Deep State Unmasked: State Dept on Hidden Cam &amp;quot;Resist Everything&amp;quot; &amp;quot;I Have Nothing to Lose&amp;quot;], ''Project Veritas''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Racist smear campaign====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1991, Republican President George H.W. Bush appointed an African American, [[Clarence Thomas]], to the Supreme Court to replace the retiring Justice [[Thurgood Marshall]]. Racist Democrats were outraged that a conservative Black, who refused to pledge to uphold ''[[Roe v. Wade]]'' which legalized the murder of millions of unborn Blacks, would become a role model for Black youth.  [[Anita Hill]], a [[lesbian]] staffer who worked for Thomas was pushed forward, against her will, to testify publicly about unverified comments she made to FBI background investigators alleging sexual harassment in the work place, essentially jokes circulating among office employees. Hill's name was illegally [[leak]]ed by Senate Democrat staffers and Chairman [[Joseph Biden]] then subpoenaed Hill, compelling her to testify in public under oath in an effort to derail the nomination and permanently scar Thomas. In an unprecedented step, Biden delayed the final vote and held extended public hearings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hill worked for Thomas at the Dept. of Education, and when Thomas left the Dept. of Education to work at the EEOC, Thomas invited her to come along and she followed. Hill never reported the alleged sexual harassment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After nationally televised hearings consisting largely of a discussion of African American body parts, Thomas was confirmed by the U.S. Senate with a majority of Americans in public opinion polls believing Thomas over Hill. A fringe  minority of partisan [[gay rights]] activists, [[feminists]], liberals, and [[mainstream media]] journalist are said to have believed Hill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Clinton, Biden and the New Jim Crow===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Clinton gore.png|right|275px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1990s the Democratic Party revived itself, in part by distancing itself from [[Jesse Jackson]] and the [[Rainbow Coalition]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.blackcommentator.com/46/46_cover.html&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;https://ofamerica.wordpress.com/tag/democratic-leadership-council/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jackson was the first African-American to win a major party primary in 1988. Blacks were getting a little too [[uppity]] in  the eyes of the Clintons and Democratic party leadership.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://prospect.org/article/crisis-working-majority-0 From Crisis to Working Majority], Stan Greenberg, ''The American Prospect'' 2, no. 7 (September 1991). Republished 24 May 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Clinton defeated the incumbent [[George H. W. Bush]] in 1992, was the beneficiary of reduced defense spending with the end of the Cold War and a balanced federal budget. Clinton proposed  [[welfare reform]] (cutting benefits and requiring many recipients to take jobs). Labor unions, which had been steadily losing membership due to [[globalization]] since the 1960s, found they had also lost political clout inside the Democratic Party: Clinton enacted the [[NAFTA]] free trade agreement with Canada and Mexico accelerating globalization and job loss over the strong objection of these labor unions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every year for twelve years, Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, who both always had at least one house of Congress controlled by Democrats, asked in their State of the Union addresses for Congress to create Enterprise Zones - special tax breaks for start-ups and businesses to relocate to blighted areas, predominantly black, inner-city urban areas - to create jobs and  deliver services. Democrats didn't want Republicans to be seen as helping blacks. However, in President Clinton's first 100 days, with a Democrat House and Senate, Democrats finally delivered Enterprise Zones after making African Americans wait 12 years to finally participate in the prosperity begun in the 1980s. [[Bill Clinton]] attacked [[Nancy Reagan]]'s anti-drug &amp;quot;Just Say No&amp;quot; campaign as &amp;quot;twelve years of neglect&amp;quot; and ratcheted up deaths caused by illegal drug use from 10,000 per year to 70,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://slate.com/news-and-politics/1996/06/clinton-s-drug-war.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] took control of both the House of Representatives and the United States Senate after the 1994 midterm election. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bill-clinton-orval-faubus-1991.jpg|left|275px|thumb|Bill Clinton with a trusted advisor, [[Orval Faubus]] in 1991. Faubus sent over 200 National Guardsmen to block 7 Black children from registering at a white school in 1957.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/1992-09-15/news/vw-739_1_orval-faubus&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Clintons and the 1994 Biden Crime Bill, more than 250,000 [[African American]]s were imprisoned in the [[United States]] than under President Reagan,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.blackelectorate.com/articles.asp?ID=320&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both Hillary Clinton and Joseph Biden took credit for mass incarceration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thenation.com/article/hillary-clinton-does-not-deserve-black-peoples-votes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cumulatively since the Clinton's passed the Biden Crime Bill, 2.5 million adult black males—more than 10% of the population—were incarcerated, splitting up black families.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;prisonpolicy.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.prisonpolicy.org/research/incarceration_rates_growth_causes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Barack Obama]], [[Louis Farrakhan]] and [[Al Sharpton]] led the [[Million Man March]] on Washington to protest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/04/wright-obama-helped-organize-march-with.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20100502040630/https://www1.chicagoreader.com/obama_reader/what_makes_obama_run/?q=012009K&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a eulogy loaded with racist [[dog whistle]]s, here's what Bill Clinton said at the grave of his mentor, Sen. J. William Fulbright: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;We come to celebrate and give thanks for the remarkable life of [[J. William Fulbright]], a life that changed our country and our world forever and for the better. . . . In the work he did, the words he spoke and the life he lived, Bill Fulbright stood against the 20th century’s most destructive forces and fought to advance its brightest hopes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/06/democratic-party-racist-history-mona-charen/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} So spoke President William J. Clinton in 1995 of a man who was among the 99 Democrats in Congress to sign the “[[Southern Manifesto]]” in 1956. The Southern Manifesto declared the signatories’ opposition to the Supreme Court's decision in ''[[Brown v. Board of Education]]'' and their commitment to segregation forever. Fulbright was also among those who [[filibuster]]ed the [[Civil Rights Act of 1964]]. That filibuster continued for 83 days.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the [[Democratic Leadership Council]] (DLC) assumed leadership of the party and its direction, some liberals and progressives felt alienated, believing the party gave in to capitalism and was unconcerned with left-wing issues in general. Some moderates challenged the validity of such critiques, citing the Democratic role in pushing the gay and progressive agendas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Biden Crime Bill of 1994=====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|The New Jim Crow|Biden Crime Bill}}&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the Central Park jogger attack, [[Joseph Biden]] boasts as one of his greatest legislative achievements passage of the 1994 Crime bill which locked up 10% of the Black adult male population of the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;prisonpolicy.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/22/us/politics/joe-bidens-role-in-90s-crime-law-could-haunt-any-presidential-bid.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When [[President George H.W. Bush]] asked for a record increase in funding to fight the [[War on Drugs]], Biden told a TV interviewer {{Quotebox|&amp;quot;In a nutshell, the President's plan does not include enough police officers to catch the violent thugs, enough prosecutors to convict them, enough judges to sentence them or enough prison cells to put them away for a long time.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/1989-09-06/news/mn-1646_1_drug-war&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/12/first-step-act-skepticism.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:1994 Superpredator Act.jpg|left|350px|thumb|The Biden Crime Bill of 1994. Feinstein, Kerry and Biden are clearly visible with President Clinton. The bill is known for its sentencing disparities which led to mass incarceration of Blacks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://fair.org/home/senate-crime-bill-unscrutinized-by-the-press/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Biden, [[Ted Kennedy]], and [[Strom Thurmond]] worked on proposals that raised maximum penalties, removed a directive requiring the US Sentencing Commission to take into account prison capacity, and created the cabinet-level “drug czar” position. In 1984, they passed the Comprehensive Crime Control Act, which, among other things, abolished [[parole]], imposed a less generous cap on “good time” sentence reductions, and allowed the Sentencing Commission to issue more punitive guidelines. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biden bragged on the Senate floor that it was under his and Thurmond's leadership that Congress passed a law sending anyone caught with a rock of cocaine the size of a quarter to jail for a minimum of five years - the notoriously racist hundred-to-one sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine. In the same speech Biden took credit for [[civil asset forfeiture]] and seizure laws, and demanded to know why [[Papa Bush]] hadn't sentenced more drug dealers to life in prison or exercise the [[death penalty]] once Congress had given him that power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.c-span.org/video/?18528-1/violent-crime-control-act-1991&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biden's version of a new crime bill added more than forty crimes that would be eligible for the [[death penalty]]. Biden boasted “we do everything but hang people for jaywalking.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[https://books.google.com/books?id=AK_DAwAAQBAJ&amp;amp;lpg=PA141&amp;amp;dq=we%20do%20everything%20but%20hang%20people%20for%20jaywalking&amp;amp;pg=PA141#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=we%20do%20everything%20but%20hang%20people%20for%20jaywalking&amp;amp;f=false The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America]'', Naomi Murakawa, Oxford University Press, Jul 10, 2014, p. 141.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[NAACP]] and other groups lobbied against the bill.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/27/us/civil-libertarians-go-after-crime-bills.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although the 1991 crime bill was defeated by Republicans, the 1994 Biden/Clinton crime bill was passed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[https://books.google.com/books?id=SGUJBAAAQBAJ&amp;amp;lpg=PT142&amp;amp;dq=biden%20strongly%20believes%20the%20administration%20needs%20to%20seize%20control%20of%20the%20issue%20by%20upping%20the%20ante&amp;amp;pg=PT142#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=biden%20strongly%20believes%20the%20administration%20needs%20to%20seize%20control%20of%20the%20issue%20by%20upping%20the%20ante&amp;amp;f=false The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America]'', Naomi Murakawa.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 2001, the United States had the highest rate of incarceration in the world. [[Human Rights Watch]] reported that in seven states, African Americans constituted 80 to 90 percent of all drug offenders even though they were no more likely than whites to use or sell illegal drugs. Prison admissions for drug offenses reached a level in 2000 for African Americans more than 26 times the level they had been under [[Ronald Reagan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thenation.com/article/hillary-clinton-does-not-deserve-black-peoples-votes/ Why Hillary Clinton Doesn’t Deserve the Black Vote], Michelle Alexander, ''The Nation'', February 10, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Biden's &amp;quot;social planning&amp;quot; had proven effective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Leftist ''Jacobin'' magazine summed up Biden's record: {{Quotebox|&amp;quot;It’s not as if Biden didn’t know what he was doing.... He just didn’t care. Biden had made a calculated decision that the elections he would win were worth the damage he inflicted....&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;But even if Biden has subsequently learned the error of his ways, the rank cynicism and callousness involved in his two-decade-long championing of carceral policies should be more than enough to give anyone pause about his qualities as a leader, let alone a [[progressive]] one.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jacobinmag.com/2018/08/biden-crime-mass-incarceration-police-prisons&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Epstein-bill-clinton-1200x630.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Bill Clinton with Clinton Foundation co-founder Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein was a frequent visitor to the Clinton White House as an honoured guest.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Impeachment: lying under oath is not a crime=====&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton was impeached in a scandal involving [[sexual crime]]s in 1998 and acquitted in 1999 when Democrats considered that a sitting president who lies under oath to a federal judge was not a crime. Impeachment caused extreme partisan divisions within the country; however a healthy economy, with the lower mortgage interest rates due to reduced defense spending and the end of the Cold War, no one wanted to upset the apple cart. Democrats themselves were not keen on the idea of Al Gore becoming president, either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hollywood mogul and Democrat megadonor [[Harvey Weinstein]] was a founder of the Clinton Legal Defense Fund to defend Bill Clinton against sexual assault charges; after Senate Democrats exonerated President Clinton, Weinstein himself faced sexual assault charges from at least 97 women over the next twenty years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Globalization=====&lt;br /&gt;
One of the first actions to promote globalization was when the Clinton administration purchased berets for Army Rangers made in China.  Plans were quickly drawn up to outsource the manufacture of army boots, fatigues, and other military apparel to China. This of course would destroy American jobs in American textile plants. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the New Deal, tales were legendary how the large military force assembled by America led to full employment in American factories, with the soldiers wives and girlfriends working in arms factories, and mothers and grandmothers employed in textile plants to make clothing and boots for soldiers. This basic economic concept was engraved in the conscience of the World War II generation, particularly loyal Democrat voters proud of the New Deal.  Outsourcing American jobs related to national defense and national security to foreigners, particularly a non-democratic and potentially hostile foreign power, seemed like total insanity to older loyal Democrat voters and Republicans, as well. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The argument that &amp;quot;cheaper is better&amp;quot;, since it would destroy American jobs and the U.S. welfare system existed as a safety net, didn't carry much weight. But Democrat voters re-elected Clinton anyway. Globalists made clear that eventually items such as medical supplies and pharmaceuticals, items also related to national security should a [[pandemic]] ever erupt, could also be safely entrusted to the Chinese communists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Godhatesfags.org====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Al gore fred phelps (1).jpg|thumb|390px|right|[[Nobel Prize]] winner and former Vice President Al Gore with [[Fred Phelps]] and their wives at a [[Westboro Baptist Church]] fundraiser for Gore. Westboro is the home of the godhatesfags website.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Rev. [[Fred Phelps]] of  the notoriously [[homophobic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://shadowproof.com/2007/05/26/fred-phelps-on-baby-samuel-cheney/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Westboro Baptist Church]] ran for governor of [[Kansas]] as a Democrat in 1990, 1994, and 1998.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ref4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/08/05/kansas.results/ 1998 Kansas Primary Results. Compiled by Congressional Quarterly.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps received 31% of the vote in Kansas's 1992 Democrat Party primary for [[U.S. Senate]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.kssos.org/elections/elections_statistics.html State of Kansas Secretary of State Website]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1993 and 1997,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=21229 The &amp;quot;God Hates Fags&amp;quot; [[Left]]], By Mark D. Tooley, FrontPageMagazine.com, February 09, 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.religionnewsblog.com/1128/kansas-anti-gay-church-embarrasses-topekans Kansas anti-gay church embarrasses Topekans], November 7, 2002. Retrieved from ReligionNewsBlog.com, October 11, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Phelps ran for mayor of [[Topeka]]. He supported [[Al Gore]] in the 1988 primaries. Phelpsbecame an extremely vocal critic of [[President George W. Bush]] and former Vice President [[Dick Cheney]], calling Bush &amp;quot;A Bible pervert.&amp;quot; Of the Cheney family Phelps said, &amp;quot;They know the iniquity they’ve wrought, but they’re not at all ashamed of it...God hates the Cheneys.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8194338250744686470#&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Election of 2000: Florida recount===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the presidential election of 2000, the Democrats chose Vice President [[Al Gore]] to be the party's candidate for the presidency. Gore and [[George W. Bush]], the Republican candidate and son of former President George H.W. Bush, disagreed on a number of issues, including abortion, gun control, environmentalism, gay rights, tax cuts, foreign policy, public education, global warming, judicial appointments, and affirmative action. Gore told the [[NAACP]] that his father, Sen. [[Al Gore Sr.]], had lost his Senate seat because he voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964-a total fabrication. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore won a plurality of over 500,000 votes but lost the electoral college by four votes. Gore asked for a recount in [[Florida]], re-opening the divisions caused by Clinton's impeachment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gore's affiliation with Clinton and the racist DLC machine&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.blackcommentator.com/46/46_cover.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; caused critics—Green Party progressive candidate [[Ralph Nader]] in particular—to assert that Bush and Gore were too similar, especially on free trade, reductions in social welfare, and the death penalty. &amp;quot;We want to punish the Democrats, we want to hurt them, wound them,&amp;quot; Nader's closest advisor said.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harry G. Levinem &amp;quot;Ralph Nader, Suicide Bomber.&amp;quot; ''The Village Voice'' May 3, 2004 at [http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0418,levine,53179,1.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Some Democrats blamed Nader's third-party spoiler role for Gore's defeat. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Afterward, Gore made millions of dollars with a film preaching progressive climate change eschatology, asserting that life on the planet would come to an end by the year 2013, sold his leftist propaganda radio network for hundreds of millions of dollars to  [[Al Jazeera]], was accused of sexual assault, and disappeared into obscurity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite Gore's close defeat, the Democrats gained five seats in the Senate (including the election of [[Hillary Clinton]] in New York), to turn a 55–45 Republican edge into a 50–50 split (with a Republican Vice President breaking a tie). However, when Republican Senator [[Jim Jeffords]] of Vermont decided in 2001 to become an independent and caucus with the Democrats, the majority status shifted along with the seat, including control of the floor (by the Majority Leader) and control of all committee chairmanships. However, the Republicans regained their Senate majority with gains in 2002 and 2004, leaving the Democrats with only 44 seats, the fewest since the 1920s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====2001: Progressives allied with jihadis====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:C9Pak4-W0AIldKy (1).jpg|right|350px|thumb|Email to Hillary Clinton: '''&amp;quot;Al Qaeda is on our side.&amp;quot;''' Al Qaeda murdered 3,000 Americans in the [[9/11 attacks]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://theduran.com/wikileaks-drops-syria-bomb-email-to-hillary-clinton-assures-her-aq-al-qaeda-is-on-our-side-in-syria/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the aftermath of the [[9-11 Attacks]], the nation's focus was on issues of national security. All but one Democrat&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Longtime [[CPUSA]] operative Rep. [[Barbara Lee]] of Texas&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; joined the Republicans to authorize the use of force in Afghanistan and overthrow the Taliban. House leader [[Richard Gephardt]] and Senate leader [[Thomas Daschle]] pushed Democrats to vote for the [[USA PATRIOT Act]] and the 2003 [[AUMF]] in Iraq. [[Progressive]]s sympathized with terrorists who wanted to destroy [[Western Civilization]]. More rational Democrats expressed concern over the domestic effects, including potential government abuses of civil rights and civil liberties with the PATRIOT Act. Senator [[Russ Feingold]] was the only Senator to vote against the act; it received more resistance when it came up for renewal, but was renewed in 2006.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the wake of the [[Enron scandal]], Congressional Democrats pushed for an overhaul of business accounting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Andrew Weissmann]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typically, an incumbent president loses seats in Midterm elections. However, in the aftermath of 19 terrorists entering the US during the Clinton administration as part of the [[multicultural]] experiment, who then murdered 3,000 Americans in the 9/11 attacks, Democrats lost seats in the House, Senate, and governorships in the 2002 midterms. Democrats flipped gubernatorial seats in New Mexico ([[Bill Richardson]]) and Arizona ([[Janet Napolitano]]) where Clinton [[cronyism|cronies]] were elected and Wyoming (Dave Freudenthal), it was offset by Democrats losing seats in South Carolina (Jim Hodges), Alabama ([[Don Siegelman]]) and, for the first time in more than a century the Democrats' Southern Strategy failed with the loss of Georgia (Roy Barnes). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Republican gains in [[The South]] had nothing to do with racism, and everything to do with Democrats' willingness to sacrifice national security for open immigration and  [[diversity]]. It led to another round of soul searching about the future of the party's increasingly radicalized base. The party's miseries mounted in 2003, when a voter recall unseated their unpopular governor of California, [[Gray Davis]], and replaced him which a charismatic liberal Republican [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]. By the end of 2003, the four largest states had Republican governors: California, Texas, New York and Florida.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the Gallup poll showed 72% public support for the [[War in Iraq]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.gallup.com/poll/8038/seventytwo-percent-americans-support-war-against-iraq.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and with the party establishment drastically weakened, a handful of dissident anti-American and progressive protesters gathered in Chicago's Federal Plaza to hear an Illinois state senator named Barack Obama speak. Obama was one of the few, if not only, elected official in the country willing to express openly his lack of concern about the jihad against Western civilization. The protest was organized by the Communist party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20100811115415/http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?page_id=2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pelosi era===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pelosi poop map.jpg|left|350px|thumb|The City of San Francisco official &amp;quot;poop map&amp;quot; of reports of human feces on the street covers Nancy Pelosi's entire 12th Congressional district.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mrctv.org/blog/new-report-shows-nancy-pelosis-district-seat-piled-high-dirty-needles-and-human-feces&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Climate Crisis Committee}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 2002, after [[Richard Gephardt]] resigned as minority leader to seek the Democratic nomination in the [[2004 presidential election]], Rep. [[Nancy Pelosi]] was elected to replace him, becoming the first woman to lead a major party in the House of Representatives. Pelosi's father was a Congressman from [[Maryland]] and later the Mayor of [[Baltimore]]; when Pelosi graduated from college in 1962 she didn't remain in Baltimore to serve her community but rather joined the white flight to California&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2006/10/07/family-dynasty-may-boost-pelosi-to-head-of-house-2/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; where [[blacks]] were fewer in number.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://qz.com/393128/white-flight-decimated-baltimore-businesses-long-before-rioters-showed-up/amp/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the 1980s she became a protégé of the progressive [[Willie Brown]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A poll conducted by [[Fox News]] released in October 2007 found that 1 in 5 Democrats &amp;amp;ndash; nearly 10 million voters &amp;amp;ndash; thought the world would be better off if the [[United States]] were to lose the [[War in Iraq]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,299374,00.html Nearly 1 in 5 Democrats Say World Will Be Better Off if U.S. Loses War], FOX News Poll, October 04, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The poll found this sentiment 3 to 4 times higher among Democrats than among moderate, centrist, and Republican voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to its 2008 platform, the Democratic Party claimed to have the objective of strengthening America, yet Democrat leaders did nothing while the Obama administration allied itself with jihadis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.news10.net/display_story.aspx?storyid=22045 &amp;quot;Democrats, ACLU Outraged Over Traveler Terrorism Screening Program&amp;quot;] C. Johnson, Associated Press&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/01/smn.19.html CNN Saturday Morning News] Transcript: December 1, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2010 the  Exalted Cyclops Robert Byrd (D., W.Va.) said &amp;quot;Democrats have been sedulously rewriting history for decades.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/06/26/whitewashing_the_democratic_partys_history_127132.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The Exalted Cyclops passed away shortly afterward and was solemnly eulogized by Speaker Pelosi and Democrat Leader Schumer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party favored free trade agreements, environmental regulation and so-called &amp;quot;trade impact assistance&amp;quot; or government handouts after trade agreements destroy private sector, taxpaying jobs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the Democratic National Convention in July 2016, no American flags were present while several attendees flew the Palestinian flag.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kassam, Raheem (July 25, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/25/old-glorys-old-news-palestinian-flag-flown-dnc-delegates/ Old Glory’s Old News To The New Democrats As The Palestinian Flag Flies At The DNC]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 31, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Prestigiacomo, Amanda (July 26, 2016). [https://www.dailywire.com/news/7811/so-uh-guess-how-many-american-flags-were-dnc-amanda-prestigiacomo So, Uh, Guess How Many American Flags Were at The DNC.] ''The Daily Wire''. Retrieved May 31, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[CPUSA]] urged people not to vote for Donald Trump even if they disliked Hillary Clinton (an indirect endorsement of Clinton).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Although there are still some very substantial differences between communists and Democrats/liberals, the line between communists/Democrats/liberals continues to blur in the United States.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ironically, the leading communist country in the world, [[Communist Party of China|communist China]], has moved farther away from communism and now has a mixed economy of [[capitalism]] and state-owned enterprises.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[China's The Most Viciously Free Market Economy On The Planet Right Now], Forbes, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Democrats blamed Russia for Hillary Clinton's loss. Obama evidently did nothing to prevent it.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====John Kerry: the Hippies last stand====&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:437px-The New Soldier.jpg|right|200px|thumb|Kerry's book, ''The New Soldier'' with [[VVAW]] activists flying the American flag upside down. By the time Democrats did start flying the American flag, they flew it upside down.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The 2004 campaign began in late 2002, when Gore said he would not run again. [[Howard Dean]], former Governor of Vermont, a war protester and critic of the Democrat establishment, was the front-runner leading into the Democratic primaries. Dean had immense progressive support, especially from the [[far left]] wing of the party. Massachusetts Senator [[John Kerry]], a [[Vietnam war]] veteran turned [[hippie]] who had heavy support from the Clinton Machine and DLC, was nominated because he was seen as more &amp;quot;electable&amp;quot; than Dean. Under [[Leader Pelosi]], Democrats moved to populist [[Trumpian]] positions that denounced free trade and the [[NAFTA]] agreement. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Babyboomer]]s - children born in the post-[[World War II]] &amp;quot;baby boom,&amp;quot; despite their large numbers in the American electorate, were always wracked by political division stemming from the Vietnam war. The election of 2004 highlighted those divisions - Kerry the supposed &amp;quot;war hero&amp;quot; who then turned on the war, and Bush the &amp;quot;patriot&amp;quot; who used family privilege to duck the draft and served in the reserves. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:John-edwards-mug-shot.jpg|250px|thumb|left|Vice-Presidential candidate [[John Edwards]]' mugshot. Edwards was charged and booked in a fundraising scheme.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the end, Kerry lost both the popular vote (by 3 million out of over 120 million votes cast) and the [[Electoral College]]. Republicans also gained four seats in the Senate and three seats in the House of Representatives, and for the first time since 1952, the Democratic leader of the Senate lost re-election. In the end, there were 3,660 Democratic state legislators across the nation to the Republicans' 3,557. Democrats netted governorships in Louisiana, New Hampshire and Montana. However, they lost the governorship of Missouri and a legislative majority in Georgia, which had long adhered to the Democratic racist tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There were many reasons for the defeat. After the election, most analysts concluded that Kerry was a poor campaigner.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Evan Thomas and Staff of Newsweek,''Election 2004: How Bush Won and What You Can Expect in the Future''(2005)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A group of Vietnam veterans opposed to Kerry called the &amp;quot;Swift Boat Veterans for Truth&amp;quot; undercut Kerry's use of his military past by citing Kerry's Congressional testimony where he called fellow Vietnam veterans war criminals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [[Jerome Corsi]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kerry was unable to reconcile his support for the [[Iraq War]] with his opposition to the war in 2004, or manage the deep split in the Democratic Party between [[Patriot]]s and protesters of the war. Republicans ran thousands of television commercials to argue that Kerry had flip-flopped on Iraq.  When Kerry's home state of Massachusetts' judicial system legalized radical progressive [[same-sex marriage]], the issue split liberal and conservative Democrats and independents. Kerry publicly stated throughout his campaign that he opposed same-sex &amp;quot;marriage,&amp;quot; but favored [[civil union]]s. Ballot initiatives appeared in 11 states that brought citizens of both parties to the polls in large numbers; all 11 initiatives passed. [[Proposition 8]] in California won by a wide margin, but California Attorney General [[Kamala Harris]] bowed to [[LGBT]] groups and refused to defend citizen referendums in court. Some Democrats argued that flaws in vote-counting systems may also have played a role in Kerry's defeat in Ohio. Other factors include a healthy job market, a rising stock market, strong home sales due to [[FNMA|government subsidized interest rates]], and low unemployment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the 2004 election, prominent Democrats began to rethink the party's direction, and a variety of strategies for moving forward were voiced. Some Democrats proposed moving towards the right; others demanded that the party move more to the left and become a stronger opposition party. Rethinking the party's position on gun control became a matter of discussion, brought up by [[Howard Dean]], [[Bill Richardson]], [[Brian Schweitzer]] and other Democrats who had won governorships in states where Second Amendment rights were important to many voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pelosi and the Progressive takeover====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pelosi Logan Act (2).jpeg|right|250px|thumb|Speaker Nancy Pelosi, an Assad apologist, violating the Logan Act.]]&lt;br /&gt;
These debates were reflected in the 2005 campaign for Chairman of the [[Democratic National Committee]], which [[Howard Dean]] won. As a progressive, Dean was the first to shepherd civil unions through the Vermont legislature. He sought to move the Democratic strategy away from the establishment, and bolster support for the party's state organizations, even in Red states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the 109th Congress convened in 2005, [[Harry Reid]], the new Senate Minority Leader, tried to convince the Democratic Senators to vote more as a bloc on important issues; he forced the Republicans to abandon their push for privatization of retirement insurance and leave the collectivist model in place. In 2005, the Democrats retained their governorships in Virginia and New Jersey, electing [[Tim Kaine]] and [[Jon Corzine]], respectively. However, the party lost the mayoral race to [[Michael Bloomberg]] in New York City, a Democratic stronghold, for the fourth straight time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cost of fighting two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq simultaneously allowed [[China]], which was granted most favored nation trading status in 2001, to rush ahead in economic development and military modernization unchecked by American competition. Cheap Chinese made goods flooded the country, while American manufacturing jobs were exported to China.  Negative public opinion on the war in Iraq, along with widespread dissatisfaction among conservatives dragged President Bush's job approval ratings down to the lowest levels of his presidency.  To win control the Democrats had to add 15 seats in the House (they added 30), and 6 in the Senate. In 2006, with [[lobbying]] scandals engulfing the Republicans, the Democrats used the slogan &amp;quot;culture of corruption.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party's electoral success in the 2006 midterms was attributed to running relatively moderate Democrats in close seats, such as the Senate races in Virginia, Pennsylvania and Montana.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dewan Shaila and Anne E. Kornblut, &amp;quot;In Key House Races, Democrats Run to the Right,&amp;quot; ''New York Times,'' 2006-10-30; but compare Rick Perlstein, &amp;quot;Who deserves credit for the Democratic comeback?&amp;quot; ''The New Republic'' 2006-11-08 at [https://ssl.tnr.com/p/docsub.mhtml?i=w061106&amp;amp;s=perlstein110806]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   Exit polling suggested that corruption was a key issue for many voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CNN, &amp;quot;Corruption named as key issue by voters in exit polls,&amp;quot; 2006-11-08 at [https://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/07/election.exitpolls/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Democrats gained a majority of governorships and made gains in many state legislatures. No Democratic incumbent was defeated in any major race.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Senate Democrats promoted Harry Reid to Majority Leader. House Democrats chose Rep. [[Nancy Pelosi]] of California for Speaker, the first woman ever, but rejected her choice for House Majority Leader, electing [[Steny Hoyer]] instead of [[John Murtha]]. Members of Pelosi's own Democratic Caucus warned failure to deliver on their promises to clean up corruption could be damaging.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.politico.com/news/stories/0507/4014.html Democrats divided on lobbying reform], Josephine Hearn and Jeff Patch, May 15, 2007. Retrieved from [[Politico]] 06/01/07.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Twenty freshmen Democrats asked for legislation to establish an independent ethics commission within the [[legislative branch]] to investigate future ethical lapses by fellow members.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alexander Bolton, [https://thehill.com/leading-the-news/dems-press-pelosi-for-ethics-panel-2007-04-18.html''Dems press Pelosi for ethics panel''], The Hill, April 19, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Pelosi resisted the reform.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7hE4HX-Cwo&amp;amp;NR=1 The More Things Change, The More They Stay the Same], ''[[ABC News]]'', April 25, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Obamunism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Barack-Hussein-Obama-mit-Louis-Farrakhan-528x524.jpg|left|225px|thumb|Barack Obama with the notorious [[anti-Semite]], [[Louis Farrakhan]]. Farrakhan called [[Jews]] &amp;quot;pigs and dogs.&amp;quot; The [[Anti-Defamation League]] identified Farrakhan as the nation's “leading anti-Semite.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.adl.org/resources/profiles/the-nation-of-islam The Nation of Islam], Anti-Defamation League.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Communism|Democrat Race Card: July 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
From 1919 to 1992 the global communist movement, headquartered in [[Moscow]], sought to destabilize and [[subversion (political)|subvert]] the [[bourgeois]] regimes of the planet.  The collapse of communism in [[Eastern Europe]] in ended the 45-year-long [[Cold War]].  [[Russia]] caved in, became [[capitalist]], joined the [[International Monetary Fund]] and qualified for [[World Bank]] loans. American leftists momentarily were in danger of losing their ideological direction. A group of academics and organizers called the [[Committees of Correspondence of Democratic Socialism]] (CoC)  relocated the center of the global Marxist movement from the [[Kremlin]] to [[Berkeley]], [[California]] and kept the movement alive.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/organizations/committees-of-correspondence-for-democracy-and-socialism-ccds/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Despite what some journalists and pundits speculated as &amp;quot;the end of history&amp;quot; with the widely reported &amp;quot;fall of communism,&amp;quot; within 15 years communists had captured the [[White House]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Led by [[anti-war|anti-War on Terror]] radicals and [[jihad]]i sympathizers schooled in the Cold War era notion of Marxist &amp;quot;[[national liberation movement]]s,&amp;quot; the Democratic party roared back with major gains in 2006, which it expanded in 2008 to sweep control of the national government and leave the GOP in a state of confusion and decline. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GOP reunited in 2009, with near-unanimous opposition to the Democrats' socialist agenda and contentious policies, especially stimulus spending and Obamacare. Polls show Obama's popularity began to erode after his [[Barack Obama approval ratings#Declines after the Gates flap|anti-police stance]] became apparent in the summer of 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the first two years of the Obama administration, the Democrats held a veto-proof Congress and the White House, ramming through unpopular legislation, with no bipartisan support, such as [[Obamacare]]. In the [[2010 midterm elections]], Democrats received a &amp;quot;shellacking&amp;quot; for defying popular sentiment. In 2009 moderate [[Bluedog Democrat]]s boasted 44 [[centrist]]s, but by 2011 it had only 8 members. A [[centrist]] core in the House was destroyed by [[progressive]]s who dominated the party. Progressive communists tended to come from so-called &amp;quot;safe seats,&amp;quot; whereas moderates, centrists, and Bluedogs came from competitive districts, and were sacrificed on the altar of ideological purity by Marxists in search of [[single party control]]. Suburbs and rural areas remained in Republican hands.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.multistate.com/Site.nsf/Elections2006PostMaps?OpenPage Multistate.com] Post-Election 2006 Maps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Voters in 2010, 2014, and 2016 rejected Democratic Party candidates at the local, state and national levels in record-setting proportions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fascist national security state====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obamunism}}&lt;br /&gt;
Under Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the Democratic party has been transformed into the party of war and the national security surveillance state. Anyone who does not toe the party line is smeared as a Russian agent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1185988329742798848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The party establishment attacks critics of [[regime change]] wars as &amp;quot;Russian&amp;quot; bots and assets.  Party operatives regularly ignore [[4th Amendment]] and due process rights - including congressional committee chairmen conducting a supposed &amp;quot;[[impeachment inquiry]]&amp;quot; which was never voted on and authorized by the [[House of Representatives]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author Max Blumenthal, senior editor of ''The Grayzone'', observed:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|This whole narrative would blow back on [[the left]] and would be used to enforce conformity on issues of war and peace, in support of the former against the latter. When we're seeing that play out in real time, with Hillary Clinton's attacks on Tulsi Gabbard.  It was clear to me as soon as Tulsi Gabbard got into the race that even though she has absolutely no connection to Russia at all, she was going to be smeared this way because this is the McCarthyite venomous poison that Hillary Clinton has brought into the Democratic Party, along with the [[national security]] state figures like [[John Brennan]] and [[James Clapper]]. They have turned principled resistance against Trump and Trumpism into a collection of spooks, dupes, and Cold War cooks, and our worst warnings are being fulfilled.  Tulsi Gabbard has been smeared as a Russian asset. She's been basically accused of committing a crime, that could hold the [[death penalty]], by someone with a multi-million dollar sleaze operation.  Hillary Clinton and her sleaze network, her corporate funded sleaze network which really grew out of her campaign where she just had so much [[Wall Street]] money, and defense industry money....this is their way of destroying an emergent trend in the party, which is somewhat non-partisan. But is also anti-war, which reflects the sentiments of Americans across the country including a lot of the working-class people who are following Trump into the Republican Party.  It was coordinated....&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The rhetorical basis for Hillary Clinton smear was established during the past two years when anyone who challenged the imperatives of the national security state in places like [[Syria]] or [[Venezuela]], where the proxy war is playing out between the US and Russia although you know it's not purely a proxy war but it's seen that way in Washington, is accused of echoing [[Kremlin]] [[propaganda]].  And so we saw that narrative weaponized against Tulsi Gabbard after the last debate. I've never seen such a meltdown among you know Beltway and Democratic establishment hacks over a minor protest candidate who's polling at 2%, as the one I saw against Tulsi Gabbard.  Susan Glasser from ''Politico'', who's just the quintessential centrist hack, who's married to Peter Baker - the ''New York Times'' White House correspondent, said that Tulsi Gabbard was echoing Russian and Syrian talking points by condemning regime change wars.  This is something that only the reel cranks of the Republican Party would have said about opponents of the [[Iraq war]].  Now it's coming out of the political center.  Josh Marshall, and founder of ''Talking Points Memo'' which all of the Democratic wonks wake up every morning and read, said &amp;quot;the only thing that Tulsi Gabbard can do is shut the F up.&amp;quot;  That was his response to her. It's like this. She inspires this kind of visceral outrage by condemning regime change wars, and one after another they accuse her of echoing Russian talking points. So now championing the cause of peace, withdrawing US troops, withdrawing US bases from a hinterland in northern Syria, it's the Russian agenda. And this is something I've never heard in my lifetime since I was kind of like a sentient being following politics.  But it's something that I read about in books about [[McCarthyism]].  And it really appears to have so infested the mainstream of the Democratic Party that we're going to be living with it for the rest of our lives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRp7iEVZD6c&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics have noted that the Democratic party has morphed into a branch of the CIA not unlike the origins of the [[East German]] [[Stasi]] government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/political/will-democratic-party-exist-after-2020-election&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The all consuming [[Russiagate]] insanity began when the FBI launched its counterintelligence probe after learning that a Trump campaign aide, [[George Papadopoulos]], was offered “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from an FBI plant named [[Joseph Mifsud]], and after Papadopoulos told Australian diplomat [[Alexander Downer]] about it.  Australian officials then tipped off their American counterparts to Papadopoulos’ remarks, after which the FBI flew agent [[Peter Strzok]] to [[London]] to interview Downer about his interactions with Papadopoulos, igniting what the FBI called operation “[[Crossfire Hurricane]],” they claim began on July 31, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aside from now fired FBI agent Peter Strzok and his also ousted FBI secret lover [[Lisa Page]] being exposed for their political bias in text messages to have created an “Insurance Policy” to damage Trump if he was elected, and Alexander Downer having funneled $25 million to [[Clinton Foundation]], the central pivot person of the entire Russiagate [[conspiracy theory]] revolved around Mifsud, who works for the UK Cabinet Office Security Vetting Appeals Panel and trains NATO intelligence personnel and diplomats at Link Campus University in Rome that's described as a finishing school for British spies, along with FBI agents who have also both taught and have trained at the school.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://disobedientmedia.com/2018/04/all-russiagate-roads-lead-to-london-as-evidence-emerges-of-joseph-mifsuds-links-to-uk-intelligence/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Incremental socialism====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Maria-and-Che.jpg|right|300px|thumb|A Democrat organizer sports a poster of communist [[mass murder]]er [[Che Guevara]] at Obama campaign headquarters.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[2008 presidential election]] campaign featured a duel between [[Barack Obama]]—a black candidate, and [[Hillary Clinton]], a woman contender. Obama won with his oratory skills and a highly efficient fund-raising and strong organization in the caucus states, while Clinton appealed to [[feminist]]s and [[white supremacist]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uWu0nSsg7w Hillary Clinton in Black History], youtube.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The contest between Obama and GOP nominee [[John McCain]] showed Obama being the clear favorite, with the vast majority of polls (with the exception of early September) depicting Obama as the clear favorite. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Obama Administration]] got off to a fast start taking on more government debt to finance massive bailouts to banks, increased regulation, and deep intervention in the automobile industry.  All those policies failed to reverse the decline from the [[Recession of 2008]]. After Democrats passed the Economic Recovery Act of 2009, [[unemployment]] increased from below 7% to 10%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm|title=Employment Situation Summary|work=Bureau of Labor Statistics|date=August 1, 2014|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democratic leaders endorsed various [[Democratic Health Care Plans]]; the question in 2009 was whether to allow &amp;quot;a crisis to go to waste.&amp;quot; Many Democrats advocated a minimum wage increase; the Democrat Congress failed to act but Obama signed an [[executive order]] imposing a $15 minimum wage on federal contractors, a meaningless gesture as few federal contracts have minimum wage workers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democrats talked about increased taxpayer funding of higher education, particularly for scientific research, land-grant colleges, community colleges and historically black colleges. Obama established a White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-historically-black-colleges-and-universities|title=Executive Order 13532 -- Historically Black Colleges and Universities|date=February 26, 2010|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Democrats subsidized the interest rate out of the federal treasury for Stafford loan voters by cutting the rate to 3.4% and eliminated private banks as middlemen in federal student loans.&amp;lt;ref name=ed&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/higher-education|title=Higher Education|accessdate=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Party felt the sting from the opposition and many Democrats began questioning their own leadership.  Liberals were disenchanted with Obama's escalation of the [[Afghanistan War]]. American deaths more than doubled in Obama's first few years compared with the preceding eight years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chesser, S.G. (2012, July 12). [http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41084.pdf Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians - CRS Report for Congress]. Pg. 3. ''Congressional Research Service'''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The health care reform that consumed most of 2009 remained unsettled, as public opinion turned against it. Environmentalists seemed resigned to the failure of [[carbon tax]]es and a [[cap and trade]] program to reduce [[greenhouse gases]]. Most of the recession dragged on.  The stimulus bill was passed quickly in February 2009 over almost unanimous GOP opposition, but despite promises of &amp;quot;shovel ready&amp;quot; projects, most of the money was never spent to relieve unemployment, job creation and [[economic growth]] remained dtagnant for years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The elections in November 2009 in New Jersey and Virginia went badly for the Democrats, as the GOP gained both governorships and many local races, not to mention the Democrats' fifth straight loss for the mayoralty of New York City.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[2010 Midterm Elections]], the Republican Party gained 63 Representatives in the House (one of the largest amounts in its history and surpassing the 1994 landslide), almost gained a majority in the Senate, and gained a majority of governorships and state legislatures in one of its best election results in its history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the Democrats had the opportunity to reverse the massive GOP gains in 2014 midterms, they completely failed and allowed the GOP to make even larger victories. Even when the GOP held a majority of governorships so large that it would be difficult to hold them all, they actually gained two states, expanding their majority to 31 out of 50.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Marxists crawl out of the closet====&lt;br /&gt;
Within the first six months of the new administration, Obama White House Communications Director [[Anita Dunn]] told a high school graduating class that communist [[mass murder]]er [[Mao Zedong]] - the biggest mass murderer in history by far - was her favorite &amp;quot;political philosopher.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/10/17/obama-debate-advisor-anita-dunn-mao/ Obama Debate Coach Named Mao as Favorite Political Philosopher] by Ben Shapiro, Breitbart News, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Van Jones]], a self-proclaimed communist, was appointed Green Czar to indoctrinate young people schooled in the [[global warming hoax]] into the communist movement. When Jones' communist background and connections became public he was immediately fired and hired as an analyst for [[CNN]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bernie Sanders]], a leading candidate in the Democratic Party's 2016 presidential nomination has a history of involvement with [[Marxism|Marxist]] organizations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/ Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist], New York Post by [[Paul Sperry]], New York Post,January 16, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.wnd.com/2016/01/is-bernie-sanders-a-communist/ IS BERNIE SANDERS A COMMUNIST?] by Joseph Farah, WND, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/kenneth-d-ackerman/history-lesson-bernie-san_b_9355082.html History Lesson: Bernie Sanders is no 'Communist,' and 'Democratic Socialists' are as American as Apple Pie], Huffington Post, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Sanders had on the wall of his Senate office a flag of the [[Soviet Union]], a regime which [[democide|exterminated]] more than 50 million of its own peoples.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nypost.com/2016/01/16/dont-be-fooled-by-bernie-sanders-hes-a-diehard-communist/ Don’t be fooled by Bernie Sanders — he’s a diehard communist], New York Post by Paul Sperry, New York Post, January 16, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 21st century, the Democratic Party dropped all pretense of advocacy for Human Rights in favor of forced [[collectivization]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Uranium One scandal====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Uranium One scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration colluded with Vladimir Putin to sell Russia 20% of American uranium reserves. The Clinton Foundation received $150 million from investors. The Clinton campaign knew that Hillary's Russia collusion by approving the sale of Uranium One (U1) from Clinton Foundation board member Frank Giustra to Russia's state owned nuclear energy company Rosatom in 2010-2011 was a problem, so they set out from at least April 2015 to smear whoever she was up against as “weak on Russia” or “Kremlin Trolls”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Obama war crimes====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Obama war crimes}}&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama illegally overthrew the government of Libya. The African [[slave trade]] was revived after the overthrow.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Political spying====&lt;br /&gt;
Not wanting a crisis - the [[Financial Panic of 2008]] - to go to waste, which won the Democrats a veto proof Congress and the White House, the Democrats went full bore single party socialist and communist with the passage of Obamacare, ignoring public opinion and opposition within their own party. While subsequent elections repealed much of Obamacare, the Democrats and Obama administration plunged ahead with the communist agenda of outlawing and criminalizing political opposition and free speech. It began with the [[IRS scandal]], and when exposed shifted to [[FISA abuse]] and persecution of journalists who printed negative stories. Blackmail and pollical spying on opposition candidates and campaigns became the hallmark of Obama's second term.  The cover up of the [[Muellergate timeline 2019|Muellergate scandal]] was used by Democrats to surreptitiously win back the House in 2018 and bring about the phony [[impeachment scam]].&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:112 2016 b4-napo-comey-hoove8201 c0-389-1420-1216 s885x516 (1).jpg|right|300px|thumb|In the Comey era, the FBI returned to the use of sexual innuendo and domestic spying on political opponents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/19/comey-trump-cnn-news-hook/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
With Obama's harassment of political opponents, first with the [[IRS scandal]], then through illegal surveillance and [[FISA abuse]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/03/08/doj-political-surveillance-from-the-irs-in-2011-to-the-fisa-court-in-2016/ DOJ Political Surveillance – From the IRS in 2011 to the FISA Court in 2016], Posted on March 8, 2020 by sundance. theconservativetreehouse.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama won re-election in [[2012 United States Presidential Election|2012]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EULOYZ-mAG0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; even though the Republican Party held on to all its 2010 gains.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This early self-deception by Democrats repeated in mainstream media after the election of Obama - that America had shifted its historic roots from center-right to center-left, had disastrous results in the coming decade.  The repression of free speech in media in favor of a pro-communist line contributed to a deterioration in race relations based on communist lies and [[propaganda]].  The [[Obama riots]] destroyed Black communities, and the [[2020 Leftwing insurrection]], led by Marxist whites in the name of &amp;quot;social justice&amp;quot;, overestimated the willingness of the American people to embrace Marxist [[revolution]], cast off [[capitalism]], and abrogate their constitutional rights to a single party [[totalitarian]] regime governed by unelected Democrat bureaucrats and [[civil servants]].  An entire generation of Americans grew up in the Obama years, where opportunity to improve one's own economic wellbeing was virtually non-existent, [[brainwash]]ed by Marxist doctrine in [[public school]]s and educational institutions, to resort to [[violence]] and attempt to tear down the whole system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While most Blacks looked for the freedom and opportunity America promised, a generation of dangerous and [[intolerant]] white youth walked the streets, looking to violently maim and destroy anyone who opposed their Marxist agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Obamagate scandal====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama post election strategy Blame Russia start WW3.jpg|right|300px|thumb]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obamagate timeline|FBI scandal|Ukrainian collusion|Trump-Russia collusion hoax}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 2016 the party [[collude]]d with Russia and the Ukraine to interfere in the United States presidential election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/12/16/horowitz-report-confirms-john-solomons-scoop-fbi-spreadsheet-regarding-steele-dossier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/12/world/europe/ukraine-paul-manafort.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The DNC has been sued for [[civil rights]] violations of [[Carter Page]] for the DNC-funded fraud against the FISA court.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/480678-carter-page-files-lawsuit-against-democratic-national-committee-over&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More than 27 Obama appointees and Democrat operatives were fired, removed, demoted or reassigned in the criminal attempt to interfere in the 2016 presidential election and later the [[coup]] plot against President Trump.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mueller Report produced no evidence whatsoever that Russia hacked the DNC. Neither Special Council Robert Mueller, nor the FBI, nor the DOJ, nor the Dept. of Homeland Security, nor the NSA, nor the CIA, nor the mainstream media, nor the Clinton campaign ever investigated DNC servers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The New McCarthyism====&lt;br /&gt;
In 2016, Russian hackers attempted, and failed, to hack into state election board computers. No federal facilities, as far as is known, were attempted. However, no federal law enforcement agency, not the FBI, CIA, [[Department of Homeland Security]] or any other federal, state, or municipal law enforcement agency ever investigated an alleged hack of the Democratic National Committee. The confluence of these two events - attempted hacking of state election boards and the publication of leaked emails from the DNC by [[WikiLeaks]] - coupled with the Obama administration's [[FISA abuse]] were melded by CIA Director John Brennan into the Russia collusion hoax.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The debunked Trump-Russia [[fake news]] morphed itself into a [[xenophobic]] reaction against Russian bots and anything Russian to explain all the Democratic party's self-inflicted misfortunes.  These Russianbot [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]] inspired some of the most absurd conjecture to explain social phenomenon and justify the most venomous hatred, in the spoken word of Democrat leaders, media elites, and violent actions of the [[extreme left]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Primary rigging====&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|United States presidential election, 2016}}&lt;br /&gt;
Again, in 2016, the Democrats performed very poorly, allowing the GOP to win the presidency with [[Donald Trump]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/08/first-polls-close-in-2016-race-trump-projected-to-win-ind-ky-clinton-wins-vt.html Trump wins presidency, defeats Clinton in historic election upset]. ''Fox News''. November 8, 2016. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to maintain their House and Senate majorities,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bresnahan, John (November 9, 2016). [https://www.politico.eu/article/republicans-on-cusp-of-keeping-the-senate/ Republicans hold the Senate in a stunner]. ''Politico''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hughes, Siobhan (November 9, 2016). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/republicans-are-confident-about-retaining-control-of-the-house-1478634160 Democrats Gain Seats in House, But GOP Retains Majority]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to win the largest amount of governorships since 1922,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lieb, David A. (November 9, 2016). [https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2016-11-09/republicans-expand-control-of-governorships-legislatures Republicans governorships rise to highest mark since 1922]. ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and to win the most state legislative chambers in history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bosman, Julie &amp;amp; Davey, Monica (November 11, 2016). [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/us/republicans-expand-control-in-a-deeply-divided-nation.html Republicans Expand Control in a Deeply Divided Nation]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved November 14, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Democrats held a record low amount of party trifectas in the states.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greenblatt, Alan (November 9, 2016). [http://www.governing.com/topics/elections/gov-republicans-add-dominance-state-legislatures.html Republicans Add to Their Dominance of State Legislatures]. ''Governing''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Siegel, Josh (November 9, 2016). [http://dailysignal.com/2016/11/09/republicans-maintain-strong-control-of-state-capitols-what-that-means/ Republicans Maintain Strong Control of State Capitols. Here’s What That Means.] ''The Daily Signal''. Retrieved November 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Democrats lost 1,042 seats—including U.S. House, Senate, state governorship, and state legislative seats—during the eight years of [[Barack Obama]]'s tenure as U.S. president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/27/democrats-lost-over-1000-seats-under-obama.html?refresh=true Democrats lost over 1,000 seats under Obama]. ''Fox News''. December 27, 2016. Retrieved December 27, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sethrich-e1494948876256.jpg|left|275px|thumb|Seth Rich (1989-2016) was an IT specialist at DNC headquarters in Washington DC. His bullet-ridden body was found on a dark street two weeks before the convention that nominated Hillary Clinton.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic primaries were rigged against Bernie Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton, and the party was shown to be helping Clinton behind the scenes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Griffin, Andrew (November 9, 2016). [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/bernie-sanders-us-election-president-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-democrats-primary-results-a7408451.html Donald Trump won election because Democrats rigged system to have Clinton beat Bernie Sanders, says WikiLeaks]. ''The Independent''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hoft, Jim (October 18, 2016). [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/obama-lectures-media-integrity-elections-forgets-democrats-just-rigged-primary-bernie/ Obama Lectures Trump on &amp;quot;Rigged&amp;quot; Elections — Forgets That Democrats Just Rigged Primary Against Bernie]. ''The Gateway Pundit''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The DNC tagged the [[Jewish]] Vermont Senator in the Bible Belt as an &amp;quot;[[atheist]]&amp;quot;, hoping to give her another advantage in the early Southern Democratic primaries. Hillary won the endorsement of the [[Ku Klux Klan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kkk-grand-dragon-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The DNC scheduled the Democratic primary debates during days of the week when most Americans wouldn't watch, such as Friday and Saturday nights. This was done to keep interest in the Democratic primary debates low and with Mrs. Clinton obviously having more name recognition, would have an early advantage over her lesser-known opponents. Even the leftist website [[Salon Media Group|Salon]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Demoro, Roseann (March 30, 2016). [https://www.salon.com/2016/03/30/10_ways_the_democratic_primary_has_been_rigged_from_the_start_partner/ 10 ways the Democratic primary has been rigged from the start]. ''Salon''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and, later, [[Elizabeth Warren]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41850798 Elizabeth Warren agrees Democratic race 'rigged' for Clinton]. ''BBC News''. November 3, 2017. Retrieved November 4, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; believed the primary was rigged against Sanders.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Donna Brazile]], the interim DNC Chair, shared Democrat town hall meeting questions with the Clinton campaign in order to help her win.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shaw, Adam (March 17, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/17/brazile-admits-forwarded-debate-questions-to-clinton-camp.html Brazile admits she forwarded town hall questions to Clinton camp]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved March 17, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ernst, Douglas (March 17, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/17/donna-brazile-admits-leaking-debate-questions-to-c/ Donna Brazile admits leaking debate questions to Clinton camp: ‘A mistake I will forever regret’]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved March 17, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She continued to deny this fact through February 2017&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scarry, Eddie (March 17, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/donna-brazile-finally-admits-she-shared-debate-questions-with-clinton-campaign/article/2617742 Donna Brazile finally admits she shared debate questions with Clinton campaign]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved March 17, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and blamed [[Russia]] for the ordeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hudson, Jerome (March 18, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/18/donna-brazile-admits-to-sharing-debate-questions-with-clinton-camp-blames-russia/ Donna Brazile Admits to Sharing Debate Questions With Clinton Camp, Blames Russia]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Later, in November 2017, Brazile revealed that not only did Obama leave the DNC deeply in debt due to his 2012 re-election campaign,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Boyer, Dave (November 2, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/nov/2/brazile-says-obama-left-dnc-deep-debt-clinton-camp/ Brazile says she found DNC deep in debt from Obama, controlled by Clinton a year before nomination]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but the Clinton campaign effectively controlled the DNC as early as 2015, and the DNC worked to keep Sanders from winning the nomination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Brazile, Donna (November 2, 2017). [https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774 Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC]. ''Politico Magazine''. Retrieved November 3, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Pappas, Alex (November 2, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/02/donna-brazile-found-proof-dnc-rigged-nomination-for-hillary-clinton.html Donna Brazile: I found 'proof' the DNC rigged the nomination for Hillary Clinton]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved November 3, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Neuman, Scott (November 3, 2017). [https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/11/03/561768006/book-reveals-clinton-campaign-effectively-controlled-dnc-as-early-as-2015 Book Reveals Clinton Campaign Effectively Controlled DNC As Early As 2015]. ''NPR''. Retrieved November 3, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.jpost.com/American-Politics/Did-the-Democratic-Party-have-an-anti-Sanders-bias-513279 Did the Democratic Party Have an Anti-Sanders Bias?] ''The Jerusalem Post''. November 4, 2017. Retrieved November 4, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
The incident highlighted the growing divisions in the party:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.voanews.com/a/democrats-cry-foul-rigged-primary-election/4098967.html Democrats Cry Foul Over 'Rigged' Primary Election]. ''Voice of America''. November 3, 2017. Retrieved November 3, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*O'Reilly, Andrew (November 3, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/03/donna-brazile-allegations-highlight-mounting-schism-within-dnc.html Donna Brazile allegations highlight mounting schism within DNC]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved November 3, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Nolan, Lucas (November 3, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/11/03/bitter-hillary-supporters-blast-brazile/ Bitter Hillary Supporters Blast Donna Brazile, Elizabeth Warren on Twitter over Rigged Primary Revelation]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved November 4, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
The mainstream media avoided these revelations:&lt;br /&gt;
*Flood, Brian (November 3, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/11/03/big-three-networks-skip-donna-brazile-bombshell-that-dnc-was-rigged-for-clinton.html Big Three Networks skip Donna Brazile bombshell that DNC was rigged for Clinton]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved November 3, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
Brazile walked back from what she revealed soon after:&lt;br /&gt;
*Crookston, Paul (November 3, 2017). [https://freebeacon.com/politics/brazile-backtracks-clinton-dnc-claims-never-said-hillary-rigged-election/ Brazile Backtracks on Clinton-DNC Claims: ‘Never Said Hillary Rigged Election’]. ''The Washington Free Beacon''. Retrieved November 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The release of Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails provided to [[Wikileaks]] by Seth Rich&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/Kp7FkLBRpKg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; showed clear [[collusion]] between Clinton, [[mainstream media]] outlets, and the DNC to smear [[Bernie Sanders]]. Millennials felt betrayed by the Democratic party. DNC Chair [[Debbie Wasserman Schultz]] was forced out on the eve of the convention, less than 24 hours after dozens of emails were published showing her and her staff rigging the primary elections for Hillary Clinton. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Whistleblower Statutes|whistleblower]] Seth Rich was gunned down execution-style in early July 2016, two weeks before the convention. Wikileaks founder [[Julian Assange]] offered $20,000 cash reward for the arrest and conviction of Seth Rich's killers or killer. Hillary Clinton said of Assange, &amp;quot;Can't we just drone this guy?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://truepundit.com/under-intense-pressure-to-silence-wikileaks-secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-proposed-drone-strike-on-julian-assange/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In October WikiLeaks released a transcript of Hillary's private paid speech to [[Goldman Sachs]]. To silence Assange, Wikileaks internet access was cut within the [[Ecuador]] embassy, where he was granted asylum.  Wikileaks Director, Prof. Gavin Macfayden, was found dead the following week. Macfayden's death was the third of a close associate of Assange in 6 months.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/790004642038050816/photo/1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--The Democratic party colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential election to interfere in American democracy.--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''[[USA Today]]'' reported a [[The indictment of 12 Russian nationals, 13 July 2018#Use of Organization 1|37-page indictment]] from special counsel [[Mueller office|Robert Mueller's investigation]] shows that Russians worked to boost the campaign of [[Bernie Sanders]] to damage [[Hillary Clinton]]. Mueller's indictment reads the Russians “engaged in operations primarily intended to communicate derogatory information about Hillary Clinton, to denigrate other candidates such as Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, and to support Bernie Sanders.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/02/17/indictment-russians-also-tried-help-bernie-sanders-jill-stein-presidential-campaigns/348051002/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sanders hired [[Paul Manafort]] partner Tad Devine of Devine Mulvey Longabaug as his chief strategist.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dmlmessage.com/about/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Devine and Manafort worked for the election of [[Putin]] [[crony]] [[Victor Yanukovich]] as President of the [[Ukraine]] in 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/07/bernie-sanders-strategist-tad-devine-paul-manafort-files-mueller&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In February 2019 Sanders entered the [[2020 presidential election]] and re-hired Devine's company, of which Devine is president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thedailybeast.com/bernie-sanders-hires-top-civil-liberties-advocate-faiz-shakir-as-campaign-manager&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sanders reminisced about his drunken honeymoon to ''[[Time magazine]]'' in his beloved [[USSR|Soviet Russia]]: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;on our honeymoon, I took Jane to [[Russia]], back when it was still known as the Soviet Union. Russia was an incredible place back then, before the billionaires ruined everything. Who needs 30 different types of deodorant anyway? In the glory days of the [[Soviet Union]], there was one brand, it was called “Deodorant,” and you had to wait four hours in line for it. By the time you got your hands on one, you were sweating so badly, not even the greediest billionaire’s fanciest deodorant could mask the stench. Or as I call it: The sweet smell of [[equality]]!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.trumprussiaconspiracy.com/2019/01/29/bernie-sanders-and-wife-on-their-honeymoon-in-russia-singing-this-land-is-your-land-with-their-russian-comrades/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://medium.com/the-haven/bernie-sanders-reminisces-about-honeymoon-in-soviet-union-bcbe3537e06c&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} Vladimir Putin commented on the glory days of the Soviet Union: {{quotebox|&amp;quot;Whoever does not miss the Soviet Union has no heart. Whoever wants it back has no brain.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Guantanamo Bay====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Guantanamo Bay}}&lt;br /&gt;
For all it's moralizing, when the Democratic party enjoyed a veto-proof Congress and the occupied the White House, they refused to override a Presidential declaration of a national emergency, cut off funding and shut down the alleged [[human rights]] abuses occurring at the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility. Suddenly the issue became &amp;quot;too complex,&amp;quot; after years of demagoguery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===115th Congress===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|115th United States Congress|Left-wing violence in the Trump era|Kavanaugh smear}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Democrat IT scandal====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|Democrat IT scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
On February 2, 2017 ''Politico'' reported 5 House IT staffers, including 3 brothers later identified as Abid, Imran, and Jamal Awan, were relieved of access to House computers and had been under criminal investigation since late 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/house-staffers-investigation-equipment-234586&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The brothers managed office information technology for Democratic members of the House Intelligence Committee handling matters on war and [[terrorism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2017/02/04/exclusive-house-intelligence-it-staffers-fired-in-computer-security-probe/#ixzz4b5enE6c9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Imran Awan worked for ex-DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://observer.com/2017/02/imran-awan-democrat-debbie-wasserman-schultz-criminal-investigation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; had access to her iPad and password,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2017/03/09/suspect-in-house-it-security-probe-also-had-access-to-dnc-emails/n&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; took $100,000 in cash from an [[Iraq]]i company,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2017/02/20/exclusive-house-dem-it-guys-in-security-probe-secretly-took-100k-in-iraqi-money/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was a suspect in the [[leak]]ing of DNC emails to Wikileaks. Despite verbose allegations of &amp;quot;Russian hacking,&amp;quot; the DNC never allowed the FBI to examine its servers to determine if indeed the DNC had been hacked, or did the leaks come from an inside source.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2017/03/09/suspect-in-house-it-security-probe-also-had-access-to-dnc-emails/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The suspects may have been involved in a leak of information that lead to the ambush and death of Navy SEAL William Ryan Owen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americanow.com/story/society/2017/02/06/muslim-spy-ring-linked-navy-seals-death&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Furthermore, because the suspects were [[Muslim]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-01/house-democrats-delayed-dismissal-it-staff-hackers-because-they-were-muslim-american&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; their activities were covered up and they were not fired until after the death of Owen. Even then, they were initially relieved of duties without their names being released, two weeks later fired,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/house-staff-criminal-investigation-234714&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and three weeks after that in a series of press leaks identified as prime suspects in what the media called the &amp;quot;Russian hacking&amp;quot; scandal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On May 18, 2017, Wasserman Schultz threatened the Capital police chief for impounding evidence in the [[Awan investigation]]. The Awan brothers were former IT specialists working for Wasserman Schultz with access to DNC data, and for House Democrats on the Intelligence Committee.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2017/05/24/wasserman-schultz-threatened-police-chief-for-gathering-evidence-on-her-it-staffers-alleged-crimes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On May 24, 2017 federal prosecutor Beranton J. Whisenant Jr. was found murdered in Florida with a bullet in his head.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbsnews.com/news/beranton-whisenant-jr-federal-prosecutor-found-dead-on-florida-beach/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wptv.com/news/state/federal-prosecutor-beranton-j-whisenant-jr-found-dead-on-hollywood-florida-beach&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://yournewswire.com/voter-fraud-investigator-murdered/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://steemit.com/chainbb-general/@stevescoins/additional-information-possibly-connected-to-the-whisenant-murder&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Curiously, the local police handled the investigation. Ordinarily, in the murder of a federal official, the FBI should investigate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/broward/article152629589.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Whisenant's body was found on a beach in the home congressional district that Wasserman Schultz represents in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===116th Congress===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|116th United States Congress}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Marxist insurrection====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Dnc-tweet-july-4th-2.jpg|left|350px|thumb|The Official Twitter account of the [[Democrat Party]] made a post alleging that a [[4th of July]] celebration was &amp;quot;[[white supremacy]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/06/29/rubicon-crossed-dnc-official-2020-position-celebrating-july-4th-equals-white-supremacy/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Symbols==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:HammerAndSickle.png|right|100px|thumb|Displaying the hammer and sickle is illegal in some parts of the world because of its [[genocidal]] history.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The most common symbol for the party is the donkey, although the party itself never officially adopted this symbol.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.democrats.org/a/2005/06/history_of_the.php History of the Democratic Donkey].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some historians suggest the jackass was born 1828 when Jackson was sometimes called a jackass by his opponents as a play on his name. A political cartoon depicting Jackson riding and directing a donkey (representing the Democratic Party) was published in 1837. A political cartoon by [[Thomas Nast]] in 1870 revived the donkey as a symbol for the Democratic Party. Cartoonists ever since have followed Nast and used the donkey to represent the Democrats, and the elephant to represent the Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early 20th century, the traditional symbol of the Democratic Party in many states was the rooster, as opposed to the Republican eagle. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no official color, but since election night 2000 blue has become the identification color of the Democratic Party for maps, while the red has become the color of the Republicans.  Increasingly blue is used by Democrats for promotions (e.g. BuyBlue, BlueFund) and by the party itself, which in 2006 unveiled the &amp;quot;Red to Blue Program&amp;quot; to support Democratic candidates running against Republican incumbents in the 2006 midterm election. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The song ''Happy Days Are Here Again'' is the unofficial song of the Democratic Party. It was used prominently when Roosevelt was nominated for president at the 1932 Democratic National Convention and remains a sentimental favorite for Democrats today. During the [[Bill Clinton|Clinton]] era, the Fleetwood Mac song &amp;quot;Don't Stop Thinking About Tomorrow&amp;quot; became a popular song at Democratic events, reflecting the growing prominence of Baby Boomers in the party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some critics refer to the group disparagingly as the [[Democrat Party]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Democratic Presidents==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Andrew Jackson]] (1829–1837)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Martin Van Buren]] (1837–1841)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James K. Polk]] (1845–1849)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franklin Pierce]] (1853–1857)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[James Buchanan]] (1857–1861)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Grover Cleveland]] (1885–1889, 1893–1897)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Woodrow Wilson]] (1913–1921)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Franklin Roosevelt]] (1933–1945)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Harry S Truman]] (1945–1953)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[John F. Kennedy]] (1961–1963)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Lyndon B. Johnson]] (1963–1969)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Jimmy Carter]] (1977–1981)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Bill Clinton]] (1993–2001)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Barack Obama]] (2009–2017)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Racism and the Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Fifth Column]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Election shenanigans]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of political parties in the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Clinton Foundation conflicts of interest]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukrainian collusion timeline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democratic party (disambiguation)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Democrats|Articles about '''Democrats''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democrats (Brazil)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:History of racism and the Democrats]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Current===&lt;br /&gt;
*Barone, Michael, and Grant Ujifusa, ''The Almanac of American Politics 2008: The Senators, the Representatives and the Governors: Their Records and Election Results, Their States and Districts'' (2007) covers all the live politicians with amazing detail. New edition every two years since 1975.&lt;br /&gt;
*  Brownstein, Ronald. ''The Second Civil War: How Extreme Partisanship Has Paralyzed Washington and Polarized America''(2007)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Crane, Michael. ''The Political Junkie Handbook: The Definitive Reference Books on Politics'' (2004) covers all the major issues explaining the parties' positions&lt;br /&gt;
*Sabato, Larry J. ''Divided States of America: The Slash and Burn Politics of the 2004 Presidential Election'' (2005).&lt;br /&gt;
*Sabato, Larry J. ed. ''The Sixth Year Itch: The Rise and Fall of the George W. Bush Presidency'' (1907), in-depth essays by scholars on key states in 2006&lt;br /&gt;
* Sabato, Larry J., and Howard R. Ernst, eds. ''Political Parties and Elections'' (2007), 540pp; an encyclopedia with 450 entries by scholars; focus is 1945 to present&lt;br /&gt;
* Sabato, Larry J. and Bruce Larson. ''The Party's Just Begun: Shaping Political Parties for America's Future'' (2001) textbook.&lt;br /&gt;
* Shafer, Byron E. and Anthony J. Badger, eds. ''Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775-2000'' (2001), long essays by specialists on each time period&lt;br /&gt;
* Shafer, Byron and Richard Johnston. ''The End of Southern Exceptionalism'' (2006), uses statistical election data &amp;amp; polls to argue  GOP growth was primarily a response to economic change&lt;br /&gt;
===Historical===&lt;br /&gt;
* ''American National Biography'' (20 volumes, 1999) covers all politicians no longer alive; online and paper copies at many academic libraries. &lt;br /&gt;
* Jensen, Richard. ''Grass Roots Politics: Parties, Issues, and Voters, 1854-1983'' (1983) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/grass-roots-politics-parties-issues-and-voters-1854-1983-by-christopher-c-gibbs-richard-j-jensen-steven-l-piott.jsp online edition]; survey by conservative scholar, with primary sources&lt;br /&gt;
* Kennedy, David M. ''Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945'' (2001), synthesis by leading scholar; Pulitzer prize [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=52284041 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kleppner, Paul et al. ''The Evolution of American Electoral Systems'' (1983), essays by scholars (some of them conservatives), 1790s to 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
* Kleppner, Paul. ''The Third Electoral System 1853-1892: Parties, Voters, and Political Cultures'' (1979), analysis of voting behavior, with emphasis on region, ethnicity, religion and class. [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=24451028  online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ling, Peter J. ''The Democratic Party: A Photographic History'' (2003).&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Grand Expectations: The United States, 1945-1974'' (1997) synthesis by leading scholar. [https://www.amazon.com/Grand-Expectations-United-1945-1974-History/dp/0195117972/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1211911625&amp;amp;sr=1-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Patterson, James T. ''Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush vs. Gore'' (2005) synthesis by leading scholar. [https://www.amazon.com/Restless-Giant-United-Watergate-History/dp/0195305221/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1211911625&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ritchie, Donald A. ''Electing FDR: The New Deal Campaign of 1932'' (2007) [https://www.amazon.com/Electing-FDR-Campaign-Presidential-Elections/dp/0700615504/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1195784762&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Rutland, Robert Allen. ''The Democrats: From Jefferson to Clinton'' (1995). &lt;br /&gt;
* Shafer, Byron E. and Anthony J. Badger, eds. ''Contesting Democracy: Substance and Structure in American Political History, 1775-2000'' (2001), most recent collection of new essays by specialists on each time period:  &lt;br /&gt;
**includes: &amp;quot;State Development in the Early Republic: 1775–1840&amp;quot; by Ronald P. Formisano; &amp;quot;The Nationalization and Racialization of American Politics: 1790–1840&amp;quot; by David Waldstreicher; &amp;quot;'To One or Another of These Parties Every Man Belongs;&amp;quot;: 1820–1865 by Joel H. Silbey; &amp;quot;Change and Continuity in the Party Period: 1835–1885&amp;quot; by Michael F. Holt; &amp;quot;The Transformation of American Politics: 1865–1910&amp;quot; by Peter H. Argersinger; &amp;quot;Democracy, Republicanism, and Efficiency: 1885–1930&amp;quot; by Richard Jensen; &amp;quot;The Limits of Federal Power and Social Policy: 1910–1955&amp;quot; by Anthony J. Badger; &amp;quot;The Rise of Rights and Rights Consciousness: 1930–1980&amp;quot; by James T. Patterson, Brown University; and &amp;quot;Economic Growth, Issue Evolution, and Divided Government: 1955–2000&amp;quot; by Byron E. Shafer&lt;br /&gt;
* Schlisinger, Galbraith. ''Of the People: The 200 Year History of the Democratic Party'' (1992)  &lt;br /&gt;
* Sundquist, James L. ''Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States'',  (1983) [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=29223022   online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wilentz, Sean. ''The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln'' (2005), detailed synthesis by a leading liberal scholar. [https://www.amazon.com/Rise-American-Democracy-Jefferson-Lincoln/dp/0393058204/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1195784940&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Witcover, Jules. ''Party of the People: A History of the Democrats'' (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
* Schlesinger, Arthur Meier, Jr. ed. ''History of American Presidential Elections, 1789-2000'' (various multivolume editions, latest is 2001). For each election includes a short history by a leading scholar and a selection of primary documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.democrats.org/ Democratic Party Official Site]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://youtu.be/ou2SAbSqyHg We Are Democrats]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/socialistvoice/democrats20.html Democratic Party: Disaster for Blacks], by Sy Landy, ''Socialist Voice No. 20 (Winter 1984)''. &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.demconvention.com/assets/downloads/2008-Democratic-Platform-final.pdf 2008 Democratic Platform (pdf download)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.mintpressnews.com/beyond-the-dnc-leaks-hacks-and-treason/247674/ George Eliason: Beyond the DNC - Leaks, Hacks, and Treason], August 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bertschlossberg.blogspot.com/2012/11/lawrence-patton-mcdonald-b_15.html A Forgotten Man: Congressman Larry McDonald]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Election Fraud}}{{communism}}{{Democrat establishment}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Political Parties]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]][[Category:Misnomers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Progressive Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gilded Age]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reagan Era]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Jacksonian Democracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racist Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hate Groups]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Police State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biden Putsch]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Darth Umbris</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>