<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Conservatrump</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Conservatrump"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Conservatrump"/>
	<updated>2026-10-27T09:49:21Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservatrump&amp;diff=1733530</id>
		<title>User talk:Conservatrump</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservatrump&amp;diff=1733530"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T23:56:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi guy! You need to cite your sources. Thanks! [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:28, 23 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*: I think I have, thank you! [[User:Conservatrump|Conservatrump]] ([[User talk:Conservatrump|talk]]) 17:42, 23 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not on your two mainspace edits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:47, 23 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*:: Ok, I think I did it. Thank you! [[User:Conservatrump|Conservatrump]] ([[User talk:Conservatrump|talk]]) 18:07, 23 February 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hillary_Rodham_Clinton&amp;diff=1733529</id>
		<title>Hillary Rodham Clinton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hillary_Rodham_Clinton&amp;diff=1733529"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T23:55:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
| name = Hillary Rodham Clinton&lt;br /&gt;
| image = Clintonfly2crop (2).jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| party = [[Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
| spouse = [[Bill Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
| religion = &lt;br /&gt;
| offices = &lt;br /&gt;
  {{Officeholder/secretary (cabinet)&lt;br /&gt;
    | of = State&lt;br /&gt;
    | state = United States&lt;br /&gt;
    | number = 67th&lt;br /&gt;
    | deputy = n&lt;br /&gt;
    | president = [[Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | terms = January 21, 2009 – January 30, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
    | preceded = [[Condoleezza Rice]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | former = y&lt;br /&gt;
    | succeeded = [[John Forbes Kerry]]&lt;br /&gt;
  }}&lt;br /&gt;
  {{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
    | state = New York&lt;br /&gt;
    | terms = January 3, 2001 – January 21, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
    | preceded = [[Daniel Patrick Moynihan]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | former = y&lt;br /&gt;
    | succeeded = [[Kirsten Gillibrand]]&lt;br /&gt;
  }}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hillary Rod-ham Clinton''' (born October 26, 1947, age {{age|1947|10|26}}) is a former American career politician. Previously, she served as a First Lady and as a Secretary of State. She ran as a Democratic Presidential candidate in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.  Due to her scandals, [[Donald Trump]] referred to her as &amp;quot;Crooked Hillary&amp;quot; in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Clinton won the Democratic Presidential nomination while under [[criminal]] investigation&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://youtu.be/mzs3K-oEjOA?t=1854 ''White House Admits Hillary Clinton Is Under Criminal Investigation'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/10/press-briefing-press-secretary-josh-earnest-692016 ''Press Briefing by Press Secretary Josh Earnest, 6/9/2016'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was endorsed by the [[Ku Klux Klan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kkk-grand-dragon-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Multiple subsequent inquiries determined the [[Obama administration]] seriously mishandled the Clinton investigations with numerous improprieties. Clinton lost the [[United States presidential election, 2016|2016 Presidential election]] to [[Donald Trump]] and blamed [[FBI]] Director [[James Comey]], white men, and self-hating women controlled by their husbands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most people who voted for Clinton in the 2016 Democratic primaries were unaware Clinton was under criminal investigation at the time, as the [[mainstream media]] failed to report it. Subsequent [[leak]]s of [[Democratic National Committee]] emails revealed primary election tampering, vote rigging, and voter suppression. [[Putin]] enemies in the [[Ukrainian]] government [[collude]]d with the Obama administration and Clinton campaign to create the [[Trump-Russia collusion hoax]] during the 2016 election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://circa.com/politics/alf-bank-in-russia-said-donald-trump-computer-connections-may-have-been-hacker-hoax&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aided by liberal media, Clinton burst on the national stage in 1992 with a politically-motivated lie she knew not to be true&amp;amp;nbsp;— calling Gennifer Flowers &amp;quot;the daughter of Willie Horton&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/old_bern_kenobi/status/783033464853409792?lang=en&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;— and exited the stage the same way by calling Donald Trump the handmaid of Vladimir Putin. She has been described by fellow Democrats as &amp;quot;the queen of warmongers, embodiment of [[corruption]], and personification of the rot that has sickened the [[Democratic Party]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gabbard-hits-back-at-queen-of-warmongers-clinton/ar-AAIZRs9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton is known for her [[racist]] remarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/04/bernie-sanders-calls-out-hillary-clinton-for-racist-language.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Health matters ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ghislaine Clinton.PNG|right|350px|thumb|Bill Clinton and [[Ghislaine Maxwell]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2012 Hillary was reported to have suffered a concussion. Initial reports suggested it occurred after a &amp;quot;fainting&amp;quot; spell; other reports stated she suffered the concussion on board a C-12 Huron military aircraft which skidded off the runaway while in Iran to jumpstart negotiations on sanctions and the nuke deal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/xTMw_w4IhBw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The crash occurred on or about 8 December 2012; Hillary had a public &amp;quot;fainting&amp;quot; spell on 15 December 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/2f-_vtw0jWg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which then led to reports she suffered a concussion. Reports say she was not hospitalized at that time. In a 24 December email she refers to having a &amp;quot;cracked head.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://70news.wordpress.com/2016/08/23/wikileaks-hillarys-crackhead-and-dementia-bombshell-hillary-clinton-used-drugs-for-dementia-and-parkinsons-disease-asked-nfl-chief-to-help-her-deal-with/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2020 election ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Presidential election}}&lt;br /&gt;
After popular Democratic presidential candidate [[Tulsi Gabbard]] confronted Hillary Clinton on her criminal and treasonous activities, Hillary Clinton backed out of a joint appearance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7591361/Hillary-CANCELS-appearance-summit-Tulsi-Gabbard-scheduled-speak.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gabbard responded with her own viral video that garnered over 2 million views in less than 24 hours.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1185988329742798848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even ''Rolling Stone'' magazine observed: &amp;quot;America laughed at Hillary Clinton's remarks about Tulsi Gabbard, but her ideas fit perfectly in the intellectual mainstream. Hillary Clinton is nuts. She's also not far from the Democratic Party mainstream, which has been pushing the same line for years&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/clinton-gabbard-russian-asset-jill-stein-901593/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton was questioned by Trevor Noah how she killed [[Jeffrey Epstein]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/01/hillary-clinton-laughs-off-question-about-killing-jeffrey-epstein/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Neurological disorder ===&lt;br /&gt;
Significant concerns have arose in late summer 2016 about Hillary Clinton's mental and neurological fitness. The Clintons have never complied with requests to disclose their medical records, which has led to widespread speculation among experts and laymen about both Clinton's health based on observation and what has been reported. In December 2011, a series of emails were passed between the staff and Hillary in which she inquired about the prescription medication, Provigil, which suggests [[Parkinson's disease]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2016/08/23/emails-top-hillary-aide-was-researching-drug-that-treats-parkinsons-alzheimers/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 2016 campaign trail it was obvious Hillary had trouble walking and keeping her balance. Other unusual occurrences in public medical experts described as a combination of brain freezes, blackouts, seizures or symptoms of post traumatic brain injury. Even while Secretary, Hillary began missing a series of important meetings, which included testifying before Congress and a [[national security]] briefing at the White House on the Benghazi attack. She canceled without notice her participation in the Friends of Syria forum in Marrakesh when her presence was vitally needed, as NATO was detecting suspicious movements of the Syrian army's chemical weapons. Her assistant, [[Huma Abedin]], noted in an email &amp;quot;she is often confused&amp;quot; because of her incapacitation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3320900/Newly-released-email-shows-aide-Huma-Abedin-warned-colleagues-Hillary-confused-needed-hand-holding-calls-foreign-leaders.html#ixzz4Iu8Nujvw]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What was particularly quixotic was the behavior of the Clinton campaign in spinning the story. Hillary's peculiar facial expressions at odd moments while talking to people could not go unnoticed. Or her coughing fits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A candidate, like a sitting president, typically travels with a press pool in tow. However the Clinton campaign has done everything imaginable to keep national reporters from getting too close to the candidate. When Hillary was rushed from the scene after collapsing at [[Ground Zero]] during a 9/11 commemoration, a 90-minute news blackout ensued. Repeated questions from reporters went unanswered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article101235582.html#emlnl=Morning_Newsletter&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When she emerged on an open street without a security detail, the person did not look at all like the Hillary we've come to know, nor the Hillary who had moments earlier been diagnosed with a serious illness. Nor the Hillary who broke down in an extended coughing fit two dsys earlier on national television on opening day of the general election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One instance of an on-camera freeze (see discussion on dyskinesia, below), it was speculated, was triggered by the cross-talk of several persons at once, such as regularly occurs in a press conference.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/OqbDBRWb63s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hillary did not have a press conference for nine months in 2016. Hillary is accompanied in all public appearances by an attending physician who most mistake for part of her security detail. The physician, who is always at her side, has been photographed ready and armed with an auto-injector syringe carrying the anti-seizure medication, Diazepam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the speculation and rumors could have been ended, of course, if the Clinton campaign had opened up and been honest about a matter that is of no slight or insignificant purpose to the American people. During an interview with Erin Burnett on CNN, Dr. David Scheiner, President Obama's former physician, insisted that a two-page note from Hillary's doctor was insufficient.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.inquisitr.com/3471504/hillary-clinton-needs-a-thorough-neurological-exam-obamas-doctor-says/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Milton Wolf, President Obama's cousin, called the diagnosis of Lisa Bardack, one of Hillary's physicians, &amp;quot;pure fiction&amp;quot;, noting the diagnosis does not appear in any medical tectbook.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://usdefensewatch.com/2016/09/dr-milton-wolf-obamas-cousin-catches-lie-in-hillary-clinton-medical-report/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even more frightening, reporters who have discussed the matter publicly have been fired. Dr. Drew was fired by [[CNN]] after six years,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/08/26/dr-drew-show-canceled-days-after-his-negative-speculation-about-hillary-clintons-health/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the [[The Huffington Post]] terminated David Seaman who had written hundreds of articles over many years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/huffpo-writer-questions-hillary-health-happened/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2104.htm Hillary Clinton Colostomy Bag Cover-up Consumes US Media Giants, Puts Debates In Doubt], Sorcha Faal, August 30, 2016. www.whatdoesitmesn.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Seaman now lives in fear of his life and personal safety&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Background ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first known incident of a problem was in 2005 when Mrs. Clinton collapsed on stage in Buffalo during a speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-01-31-clinton-collapse_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2009 Hillary fell and broke her elbow. Details of the incident have been kept secret.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stage 2 Parkinson's Disease is marked by tremors, changes in facial expression, difficulty walking and the person's posture starts to change. Hillary is unable to remain sitting very long without being proped up by pillows.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://heatst.com/politics/must-see-photos-of-hillary-clinton-propped-up-on-pillows/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Stage 3 marks a major turning point in the progression of the disease. Many of the symptoms are the same as in Stage 2, however decreased reflexes and loss of balance occurs. Movement becomes slower. This is why falls become more common in Stage 3.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.healthline.com/health/parkinsons/stages#Overview1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Medical experts cite this is observable evidence caused by a &amp;quot;break down&amp;quot; in key areas of the brain, which includes the cortex, pons, basal ganglia, cerebellum and brainstem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a December 2015 televised event, Hillary was five minutes late getting on stage to the debate which already started because she refused to share a bathroom facility with another female staffer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/20/hillary-clinton-missed-debate-wouldnt-share-bathroom/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was the beginning of speculation on Hillary's use of catheeters or other prosthetic devices consistent with the effects of advanced Parkinson's disease and other forms of traumatic brain injury.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the campaign trail Hillary has confused Donald Trump with her husband, appears to have had momentary blackouts while speaking, involuntary head movements and bobbing, needs help walking, balancing, getting in and out if vehicles, or going up a flight of stairs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/Zr1IDQ2V1eM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She wears tinted sunglasses and excessivelly baggy clothes in the heat of summer to hide what photographic evidence suggests are catheeters or colostomy apparatices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2104.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary abruptly left a [[9/11]] commemorative ceremony at the site of the [[World Trade Center]] due to a very public medical episode. Her knees buckled and she lost a shoe as her [[Secret Service]] detail loaded her into a van, despite protestations from the Clinton camp that her health is fine and discussion of it being limited to conspiracy kooks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/pzf/status/775002372875644928?s=09&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With more than two full months to election day, even before the much publicized 9/11 collapse, Hillary cancelled all but three scheduled appearances on her calendar, sending out surrogates Bill Clinton, [[Chelsea Clinton|Chelsea]], [[Tim Kaine]], and in some cases [[Joe Biden]], the President or [[Michelle Obama]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hillaryspeeches.com/scheduled-events/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hillary prefers to stay home and measure her strength day by day to meet the rigors of campaigning and facing the public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/whats-wrong-hillary-wears-heavy-coat-black-pants-nantucket-fundraiser-august/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Blood clotting ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary has three known instances of blood clotting, or thrombosis. The first was a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in her right leg in 1998. Deep vein thrombosis is a serious condition that occurs when a clump of blood forms into a gelatinous, solid state in a vein deep inside the body. She told the White House physician that she was too busy and refused hospitalization, so was treated as an outpatient at Bethesda Naval Hospital. She later described the experience of the clot as her &amp;quot;scariest moment.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doctors found a second clot in her legs in 2009, a fact not widely known until Dr. Lisa Bardack issued a clean bill of health in July 2015 in preparation of her campaign for the Democratic nomination for the presidency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then came her skull fracture, concussion, and brain clot in 2012 and 2013 under mysterious circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a catch all category defined as &amp;quot;an alteration in brain function, or other evidence of brain pathology, caused by an external force&amp;quot; rated from mild (those with no immediate recognizable effects) to severe. An MRI revealed a dangerous blood clot had formed in her brain. Hillary was hospitalized at the New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center. Dr. Lisa Bardack denied Hillary suffered a stroke, but Obama administration aides reported she had.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/obama-staff-dropped-bombshell-hillary-medical-details-two-strokes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Bardack issued public statements saying that she was being treated with bloodthinners (coagulants) and that &amp;quot;The secretary is making excellent progress.&amp;quot; [[NBC News]] medical correspondent Robert Bazell was skeptical about the blood clot being caused by an earlier concussion because, he said, it if were, it would not be treated with anti-coagulents. &amp;quot;So either it's not really related to the concussion and she's got a blood clot in her leg or something, or there's something else going on that we're not being told.&amp;quot; Chelsea Clinton was seen departing the hospital in tears.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-admitted-hospital-blood-clot-article-1.1230031&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bill Clinton later reported it took Hillary 6 months to recuperate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary was diagnosed with a right transverse sinus venous thrombosis in the vein situated in the space between the brain and the skull behind the right ear, a rare and potentially life-threatening malady. Dr. Alan Boulos, chief of neurosurgery at Albany Medical Center speculated a genetic predisposition made her vulnerable to clotting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014, preping for her presidential run, Hillary told Diane Sawyer of [[ABC News]], &amp;quot;I'm probably on blood thinners for the rest of my life&amp;quot;, and vehemently denied any brain injury despite abundant medical evidence provided to the public proving otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Subcortical vascular dementia ===&lt;br /&gt;
A Twitter posting in August 2016 about Hillary's advanced medical condition was reportedly knocked down by Hillary's team and alleged Fact Checkers as a hoax and conspiracy. The reports are said to have been leaked possibly by the father of one of the physicians treating Hillary Clinton. The physician's name is Dr. Daniel Fleck. His father's name is Vincent Fleck. Vincent Fleck was found dead less than 24 hours after the reported leak. The leaked files are from the office of the physician who authored the two-page clean bill of health, and contradict what she distributed publicly. The clean bill of health is viewed as a whitewash by the Clinton campaign, intended to serve as the official response to requests for Hillary's medical records.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eutimes.net/2016/08/father-of-doctor-treating-hillary-clinton-for-dementia-mysteriously-dies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two-page clean bill of health was written by Dr. Lisa Bardack, who claimed Hillary was in &amp;quot;excellant physical condition&amp;quot;. Bardack said Clinton was diagnosed with a &amp;quot;transverse sinus venous thrombosis,&amp;quot; a type of blood clot in the brain. She was given blood thinners to dissolve the clot. Hillary experienced double-vision and had been given prism glasses to wear. Bardack wrote that by 2013 Hillary Clinton had &amp;quot;complete resolution of the effects of the concussion&amp;quot;, which any [[NFL]] fan and layman can tell is complete nonsense. No mention was made of Hillary's persistent coughing fits or loss of balance. Bardack noted Hillary also suffered from deep vein thrombosis (blood clotting) in 1998 and 2009 and takes the medications Armour Thyoid and Coumadin (an anticoagulant blood thinner) daily. Armour Thyroid is an old fashion brand name remedy of desiccated thyroid extract from dried [[beef]] and [[pork]] [[thyroid]] glands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The earliest leaked document from Dr. Bardack's office is dated February 5, 2014, stating the patient's present complaint is &amp;quot;Blacking out for short periods of time, uncontrollable twitching, memory loss, fatigue.&amp;quot; It lists the [[diagnosis]] of &amp;quot;Complex Partial Seizures, Subcortical Vascular Dementia.&amp;quot; Subcortical vascular dementia is caused by widespread microscopic damage to the brain resulting from hardening of the arteries that supply blood to the subcortical areas of the brain. The leak further notes &amp;quot;the patient is having signs of more frequent Complex Partial Seizures.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://allnewspipeline.com/Hillary_Clinton_Medical_Records_Released.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levadopa (L-dopa) is considered the most effective treatment of Parkinson's disease. Dyskinesia, or involuntary muscle movements, is a side affect of longterm treatment with levadopa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|&amp;quot;Dyskinetic movements look like smooth tics&amp;amp;nbsp;— sometimes like an uncoordinated dance. People who experience dyskinesia sometimes mask the involuntary movement with finalistic movements (if the arm starts moving on its own, they might bring it to their head and adjust their hair, as if it was planned)&amp;quot;, according to the Michael J. Fox Foundation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.michaeljfox.org/understanding-parkinsons/living-with-pd/topic.php?dyskinesia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tinted blue sunglasses are considered a therapuetic remedy to alleviate symptoms of tardive dyskinesia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://commons.pacificu.edu/pt/93/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5e6_1473703406&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Coughing and aspiration pneumonia ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary's many coughing fits which have become commonplace is a serious symptom of an underlying progression of Parkinson's disease. The coughing is caused by a difficulty in swallowing, called dysphagia. The coughing or throat clearing comes after eating or drinking, and a feeling as if food is stuck in the throat. As Parkinson's progresses, swallowing can become very difficult. Food or liquid can get into the [[lung]]s causing aspiration pneumonia. Aspiration pneumonia is the leading cause of death among Parkinson's disease sufferers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.michaeljfox.org/foundation/news-detail.php?swallowing-and-parkinson-disease&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Labor Day weekend, the traditional start of the Presidential general election, Hillary was on the offensive, choosing Cleveland&amp;amp;nbsp;— the city where Trump had just been nominated&amp;amp;nbsp;— to kickoff her campaign. Hillary was hampered by a coughing fit which she could neither suppress nor overcome. She tried compensating by using practiced gestures making the speech seemingly ridiculous. With a large media contingent in attendance she wanted to be hardhitting and strong, replete with the obligatory anti-Trump throw away lines. Rather, her voice was weak, her delivery frail, and her countenance pitiful in forcing herself to go through the motions just to satisfy her own mortal ambitions and the partisan truculency of her audience, in denial of reality, blinded by false hope, as she heaped derision on their fellow citizens and imaginary enemies. Once again, the whole world was forced to endure this sad, pathetic spectacle.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theamericanmirror.com/hacking-hillary-complete-timeline-2016-coughing-fits/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse at Ground Zero on 9/11, Hillary's press machine put out the story she was diagnosed with generic pneumonia. Again, Dr. Bardack claimed she was being trested with anti-biotics for a bacterial infection; however that did not stop the Democratic nominee from exposing a small child to the infectious disease for a quick photo-op moments after the medical event.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-dead-zone-1473790527&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Clinton team claimed it was no big deal, &amp;quot;we all had it&amp;quot;, meaning they knew it was infectious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.people.com/article/hillary-clinton-staff-sick-pneumonia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mothers on Twitter expressed bewilderment and horror that Hillary, with a bacterial infection, was transported to Chelsea Clinton's home where a two-month old infant was present, rather than a hospital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Treatment ===&lt;br /&gt;
After the release of the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; two-page statement on Hillary's health by Dr. Bardack, neurological experts and physicians weighed in. Dr. Drew Pinsky, &amp;quot;America's most trusted physician&amp;quot; according to CNN's subsidiary ''Headline News'' (HLN),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20160830040320/http://www.hlntv.com/shows/dr-drew&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was asked if Hillary was okay. Millions of people had seen the photos of Hillary being helped up stairs or videos of her facial contortions and head bobbing. Dr. Drew responded that he was gravely concerned not just about her health, but her [[health care]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Drew had consulted with Dr. Robert Huizenga, an internist-pulmonologist, and evaluated the medical record she released. She had two episodes of deep venous thrombosis (blood clots in the leg). She also has hypothyroidism (thyroid isn't producing enough hormone). She'd been treated with Armour Thyroid, &amp;quot;something that we used to use back in the '60s&amp;quot;, Dr. Drew and Huizenga both remarked, &amp;quot;Hmmm, that's weird.&amp;quot; Then in response to the anticoagulent Coumadin, Dr. Drew observed, &amp;quot;That's weird, because Coumadin really isn't even used anymore. Now we use Eliquis or Xarelto, things like this. Certainly the presidential candidate would get one of the newer anti-coagulates.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Bardack, who pronounced Hillary in &amp;quot;excellent physical condition&amp;quot; in the same public release made the diagnosis of Transverse Sinus Thrombosis, an exceedingly rare clot in the collecting system for the cerebral spinal fluid. Dr Drew remarked, it &amp;quot;guarantees that somebody has something wrong with their coagulation system.&amp;quot; Dr. Drew went on to explain how the hypothyroid treatment, Armour Thyroid, may be the &amp;quot;very medicine causing this problem, and they're using an old-fashioned medicine to treat it. What is going on with her health care? It's bizarre.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then addresding the falls and concussion, when she hit her head, she had to wear prism glasses because of her double vision. &amp;quot;That is brain damage, and it's affecting her balance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/dr-drew-gravely-concerned-clintons-health-archaic-treatments/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Dr. Drew gave this interview, CNN contacted him and asked him to retract his comments. Dr. Drew refused. Eight days later he was summarily fired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Daniel Scheiner, who was the personal physician to President Obama and is not an employee of CNN, told CNN before the blackout on Hillary's health reporting, &amp;quot;There are a number of questions I have. First of all, she's also 68 years old, and while I think that medical letter was well written and was very professional&amp;amp;nbsp;... it's not enough. For example, she's on Coumadin, a medication to prevent blood clots&amp;amp;nbsp;... I'd like to know how well she's being controlled. That's a difficult drug to use. Also, I think she should have&amp;amp;nbsp;... a thorough neurological examination in 2016. We know what happens to football players, how they begin to lose their cognitive ability.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/IFxe-jvME8k&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Scheiner will not be invited back to CNN to discuss Hillary's health anytime soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Possible replacement for health concerns ===&lt;br /&gt;
Following Hillary's high-profile collapse on Sunday morning September 11, 2016 at Ground Zero it was no longer possible to deny Hillary's debilitating condition as a [[vast right-wing conspiracy]]. Former [[MSNBC]] anchor Dan Schuster, while the blackout on Hillary's condition was still fresh, tweeted that DNC officials were pondering an emergency meeting to replace Hillary Clinton. By Monday afternoon discussions were confirmed by former DNC Chairman Dan Fowler who was appointed by President Bill Clinton to oversee his 1996 reelection. Fowler insists the open discussions were about process for replacing a nominee, not the actual replacement. A singular precedent exists, the 1972 replacement of Sen. Tom Eagleton with [[Sargent Shriver]] as VP on the Democratic ticket, an event many considered as sealing the fate of Sen. George McGovern's fledgling bid for the presidency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DNC rules are somewhat simple as to filling a vacancy in the nomination process. Not so clear is the DNC's ability to create a vacancy by removing a candidate. After its latest scandal culminating in the removal of Chairperson [[Deborah Wasserman Schultz]] for alleged party rule and ethical violations in delegate rigging and voter suppression of Bernie Sanders supporters, Donna Brazile was appointed as interim chair. While highly partisan, Brazile can be considered that rare breed of Democrat who puts party interests ahead of the personal ambitions of the Clintons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the DNC's 447 members, 179 constitute a quorum. The DNC chair is vested with many discretionary powers, such as the ability to call an emergency meeting. Filling a vacancy however, requires consent of the full committee. According to Elaine Kamarck, a 20-year veteran of the DNC Rules Committee, the selection process is wide open, and the top post does not automatically devolve upon [[Tim Kaine]], a former DNC chair himself who won a majority of delegates at the convention as the successor to the president in the event of death, incapacition, or vacancy. Others speculate such a convocation would degenerate into politicking for various interest groups represented by the likes of Bernie Sanders, who failed to win a majority at the convention, or Joe Biden, who received no delegate support at all at the Philadelphia conclave.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-health-replace-contingency-228037&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Rasmussen poll found 48% of likely Democratic voters thought Bernie Sanders should be the nominee if health issues forced Hillary out. 22% say Vice President Joe Biden should be the nominee, while only 14% opted for vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine. 9% of Democrats think it should be someone else.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/which_democrat_should_replace_hillary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background and positions ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary and Bill Clinton met in 1972 while studying law at [[Yale University]]. Inspired by [[Alabama]] Democrat Gov. [[George Wallace]] and his wife Gov. [[Lurleen Wallace]], the two forged a pact to help each other's career&amp;amp;nbsp;— when one was termed-limited out, the other takes over.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-bill-hillary-clinton-marriage-52-years-20140718-story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/27/opinions/bill-clinton-hillary-clinton-marriage-drexler/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.chicagotribune.com/chinews-mtblog-2007-11-obama_on_the_clinton_secret_pa-story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They worked as a team on [[George McGovern]]'s [[1972 presidential election|1972 presidential campaign]] and then on Bill's first unsuccessful bid for the U.S House in 1974.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She became a First Lady, U.S. Senator, Secretary of State and Democratic presidential nominee. According to financial disclosure statements, she has served uninterruptedly as Secretary/Treasurer of the Clinton Family Foundation since 2001.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://guccifer2.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/clintons-pfd-2015.pdf Executive Branch Personnel Public Financial Disclosure Report], OGE Form 278, Hillary Rodham Clinton, 05/15/15, p.19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She is the wife of former President [[Bill Clinton]] who was [[impeach]]ed for providing false testimony and covering up sexual misconduct.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/articles122098.htm|title=Approved Articles of Impeachment|date=December 20, 1998|access-date=November 2, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mr. Clinton has been accused of violent [[sexual assault]] by numerous surviving victims over many years,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/643475466490388480 Hillary Clinton on Twitter 10:24 AM&amp;amp;nbsp;— 14 Sep 2015].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; nonetheless Hillary has stood by him and attacked his accusers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prorev.com/whtwtrr.htm Clinton Scandal Clips from The Progressive Review] June 2000&amp;amp;nbsp;— Aug 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She is an [[elitist]], [[liberal]], [[pro-abortion]] advocate, supports the death penalty, federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research, [[same-sex marriage]] (which she originally opposed but flip-flopped once popular opinion shifted in favor of it, as did many other Democrat politicians during the 1990s and 2000s), and civil unions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI Hillary Clinton lying for 13 minutes straight&amp;amp;nbsp;— video]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Her manipulation of racial politics and victims of sex crimes in the 1992, 1996, 2008, and 2016 presidential elections has left her with an abysmal record in the fight for [[civil rights]], fairness, equal treatment of women and minorities and victims of sex crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Early history ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article [[Hillary Clinton early life and career]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton was born in the rich white suburbs of Chicago. She attended Maine East High School, where she wrote for the school newspaper, participated in student council, was chairperson of the Young Republicans, and was selected for National Honor Society.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Whitehouse.gov&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Hillary Rodham Clinton |url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/1600/first-ladies/hillaryclinton |publisher=The White House |access-date=June 28, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Carl Bernstein]] has chronicled the history of mental illness and depression which runs in the Rodham family. Her uncle attempted to hang himself but eventually died as an alcoholic in a fire while smoking in bed. Her other uncle died of coronary thrombosis or blood clotting in the heart. Her brothers lived &amp;quot;in a fog of melancholia.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Her father was emotionally abusive to her mother and the whole household; neighbors could not understand why her mother wouldn't leave him, despite her constantly expressing a desire to do so. Or his willingness to see her leave. This was before Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty, so it wasn't that easy to break up a family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bernstein describes her father as, &amp;quot;a sour, unfulfilled man whose children suffered his relentless, demeaning sarcasm and misanthropic inclination, endured his embarrassing parsimony, and silently accepted his humiliation and verbal abuse of their mother&amp;amp;nbsp;... he had almost no recognizable enthusiasms or pretense to lightness as he descended into continuous bullying, ill-humor, complaint, and dejection.&amp;quot; Her notorious temper and abusive attitude toward underlings was inherited from her father.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clintons-strengths-and-anger-white-house-revealed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Her father was a Republican and her mother a Democrat, they used to joke how they cancelled each other's vote out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She attended Wellesley College, which at the time was segregated by sex, and graduated in 1969 during the height of radical opposition to the Vietnam War. She graduated with honors based on her 92-page senior thesis entitled ''&amp;quot;There Is Only the Fight&amp;amp;nbsp;...&amp;quot;: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.'' The subject was famed [[community organizer]] [[Saul Alinsky]]. When Clinton became First Lady, researchers sought access to the document, but the White House asked Wellesley to hide the embarrassment. Wellesley complied and refused access to researchers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1969 to 1973, she attended Yale Law School where she worked on the editorial board of the ''Yale Review of Law and Social Action''.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;arkhc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |url=http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=2744 |title=Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton (1947–) |work=The Encyclopedia of Arkansas History &amp;amp; Culture |access-date=June 28, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During her second year, she worked at the Yale Child Study Center which involved research on early childhood brain development. In the late spring of 1971 she, among others, got involved with [[Bill Clinton]]. [[Yoko Ono]], widow of [[Beatle]] songwriter [[John Lennon]], claims to have had a brief romantic fling with Hillary at this time. Ono told reporters in 2016 her election &amp;quot;would be a great advancement for [[LGBT]] and Women rights in America&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/yoko-ono-i-had-an-affair-with-hillary-clinton-in-the-70s/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ever the ambitious opportunist, she accepted an appointment to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Impeachment during the [[Watergate scandal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/features/2015-11-05/how-richard-nixon-created-hillary-clinton How Richard Nixon Created Hillary Clinton], Sam Tanenhaus, Nov 5, 2015. bloomberg.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal sycophantic [[sexist]]s loyal to Bill Clinton deny she received this appointment on her own merit. They claim the position was offered to Bill first, and when he refused he suggested Rodham for it, which is highly unlikely. The appointment was made by John Doar, a Republican counsel on the committee. Given her Republican credentials as chairperson of the Wellesley Young Republicans, and her previous employment on Capitol Hill in 1968 in the office of the Ranking Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Melvin Laird who became Nixon's Defense Secretary, and the fact she had better grades than Bill at Yale Law School, this appears to be just another leftover highly facitious claim in building the Bill Clinton myth and mystique.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Nixon resigned she headed to Arkansas where Bill was carrying on with several other women including a childhood sweetheart who reports Hillary smelled so bad from not showering it made her gag.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2059308/bill-clinton-nicknamed-bad-smelling-hillary-the-warden-but-wanted-a-baby-to-quash-rumours-she-was-a-lesbian-his-long-term-lover-claims/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bill and Hillary had mapped out personal and political career ambitions together and a [[States Rights]] agenda to accomplish it. Bill unsuccessfully ran for Congress in 1974. The two married on October 11, 1975. He was elected Governor in 1978, defeated in 1980, resumed it uninterruptedly til he became president. Bill said she only wanted a child so people wouldn't think she's a lesbian, and daughter Chelsea was born in 1980. When a [[Federal court]] ruled the Clintons violated the [[Voting Rights Act]] with their legislative reapportionment plan,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;42 U.S.C. 1973&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; their grip on Arkansas was slipping and they began making plans for a play on Washington.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a lawyer Hillary is an expert in medical confidentiality laws. Sam Smith of the leftist ''Progressive Review'' reported in 1998 an incident which occurred after Bill Clinton's electoral defeat in 1980. Bill Clinton arrived in a Little Rock emergency room with a drug overdose. Smith wrote,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Hillary Clinton had been notified by phone and had instructed the hospital staff that Clinton's personal physician would be arriving soon. When Mrs. Clinton arrived, she told both of the resident physicians on duty that night that they would never practice medicine in the United States if word leaked out about Clinton's drug problem. Reportedly, she pinned one of the doctors up against the wall, both hands pressed against his shoulders, as she gave her dire warning.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://prorev.com/connex.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inslaw and the PROMIS technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Inslaw Inc]]''' developed the famous PROMIS software, an NCIC-type tracking technology incorporating numerous databases such as court records, financial institutions, utility companies, etc. Inslaw was forced into bankruptcy in 1985 because the US Justice Dept., which contracted to purchase it, reneged on its obligations. Pirated versions of the software were sold by US intelligence worldwide to 88 foreign intelligence agencies, and other organizations such as banks, which included a &amp;quot;backdoor&amp;quot; for US intelligence to hack into. Hillary Clinton was the intellectual property lawyer for a company that obtained and marketed to banks copies of the stolen PROMIS software.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/m1GEnF1pdZ0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PROMIS software explains why Bill Clinton never uses email. [[Dick Morris]]'s explanation&amp;amp;nbsp;— that the genius with a 174 IQ who can work a complete ''New York Times'' crossword puzzle in 15 minutes while sitting on the toilet&amp;amp;nbsp;— does not know how to type maybe true. But Clinton most definitely knows through Hillary, who was close!y involved in these matters since the mid 1980s, there is no way ever to keep emails secret. Bill Clinton is in the habit of issuing oral instructions to close aides and the use of surrogates for communication, deniability, and no paper trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several mysterious deaths are associated with the lawsuits the owners of Inslaw brought against the government for the theft of Inslaw's intellectual property that Hillary Clinton represented as the property of Systematics. In one case an entire family was murdered.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Larry Guerrin'''&amp;amp;nbsp;— February 1987. Investigator. Killed investigating the INSLAW case.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Alan Standorf'''&amp;amp;nbsp;— January 31, 1991. Employee of [[National Security Agency]] in electronic intelligence. Standorf was a source of information for [[Danny Casolaro]] who was investigating INSLAW, [[BCCI]], etc. Standorf's dead body was found in the backseat of a car at Washington National Airport.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dennis Eisman'''&amp;amp;nbsp;— April 5, 1991. Attorney with information on INSLAW. Eisman was found shot to death.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ian Spiro'''&amp;amp;nbsp;— November 1992. Informant. Spiro had supporting documentation for grand jury proceedings on the INSLAW case. '''His wife and three children''' were found murdered on November 1, 1992 in their home. They all died of gunshot wounds to the head. Ian's body was found several days later in a parked car in the Borego Desert. Cyanide poisoning.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''John Crawford'''&amp;amp;nbsp;— April 1993. Attorney with information on INSLAW. Reportedly died from a heart attack in Tacoma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Iran-Contra ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article:'' [[Iran-Contra]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mena Airport]] in Arkansas became the logistical point for implementation of the Iran-Contra ordeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/g_epmurfIk8 ; see also Bill Plante &amp;amp; Michael Singer, ''Still a Strong Scent on the Mena Trail'', Letter to the Editor, [[Wall Street Journal]], 5/3/94.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gross value of the illegally imported [[narcotic]]s at Mena is said to have reached $100 million per month at its height, nearly ten times its cost of delivery in trade and arms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mena airport was documented to be the biggest drug-smuggling operation in the [[United States]] importing $100 million per month in cocaine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/vKdPaQnZ1DA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is alleged that much of that money had been laundered through the [[Arkansas Development Finance Authority]] (ADFA), a bonding agency that Bill Clinton created to help small businesses get started. The video and Mara Leveritt's 1999 book, ''The Boys on the Tracks'' discussed that Bill Clinton's half-brother, Roger Clinton, and his bond dealer friend [[Dan Lasater]] had gone to prison for [[cocaine]]. Richard Garrett had stated on ''Unsolved Mysteries'', a television program which taped informational segments regarding the boys' on the tracks beginning in 1988,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://unsolved.com/archives/don-henry-kevin-ives&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Saline County and Central Arkansas were overrun with drug-trafficking at a high level that extended to other counties and other states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even when Mena's gun-running operation was shut down after 1986, Mena continued to be used for illegal narcotics smuggling into the United States and the profits were pocketed by locals under then Governor [[Bill Clinton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2016/08/26/the-boys-on-the-tracks-are-back&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1989 Clinton received petitions from Arkansas citizens demanding he convene a state grand jury and investigate Mena.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bondiviewertest.azurewebsites.net/DataView/Article/HT?issueKey=19920501&amp;amp;articleKey=19920501021 Clinton Turned Blind Eye to Arkansas Contra Connections], ''High Times'', May 1992, p. 21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Winston Bryant made Mena an issue in his successful bid for Arkansas [[Attorney General]] in 1990. A year later Bryant turned over state files involving Mena to Iran-Contra special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh, but Walsh did nothing with the reams of evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mena airport ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article:'' [[Mena airport]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:320px-Contra commandas 1987.jpg|right|400px|thumb|The Contras. Bill, Hillary, Vince Foster, and others ran the US end of the guns-for-dope operation. Webb Hubbell and other Clinton associates ran the money laundering schemes. By 1992, [[George H.W. Bush|Bush Senior]] owed enough of a debt for their cooperation and silence, and the Clintons had enough to blackmail the Bush's with to mount a direct challenge for the presidency. The Contra operation also gave the Clintons' opportunity to expand their contacts within the US Intelligence Community. By the time it was supposedly investigated in 1987, no one asked the obvious question: ''How were the Contras funded for 4 years before any weapons were sold to Iran?''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Within the name itself, 'Iran-Contra', implies the cover-up. Mena-Contra is more aptly fitting. Just as in the 'Benghazi investigation,' which masked Obama and Hillary supply efforts to ISIS&amp;amp;nbsp;— a bipartisan effort of which Republican [[Sen. John McCain]] was [[Obama war crimes#February 2012|also involved]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2015/09/11/exclusive-new-emails-in-benghazi-weapons-mystery.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hillary Clinton]] asked [[Vince Foster]] to help her spy on her husband in 1990. She wanted to know how vulnerable he would be in a presidential race. Foster hired Jerry Parks, an Arkansas investigator who later worked as the head of security for the Clinton/Gore campaign headquarters in [[Little Rock]]. According to Parks's widow, &amp;quot;Jerry asked Vince why he needed this stuff on Clinton. He said he needed it for Hillary.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/new-documents-prove-hillary-clinton-murder-cover/#ixzz4Nvn7BWqq&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parks did other work for Foster. According to his wife, Parks delivered large sums of money from Mena airport to Vince Foster at a K-Mart parking lot. Mrs. Parks discovered this when she opens her car trunk one day and finds so much cash that she had to sit on the trunk to close it again. She asked her husband whether he was dealing [[drugs]], and Foster explained that he paid Parks $1,000 for each trip he took to Mena.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/clinton/arkansas.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I'M A DEAD MAN,&amp;quot; whispered Parks, as he looked up at the television screen. It was a news bulletin on the local station in Little Rock. Vincent Foster, a childhood friend of the President, had been found dead by the US Park Service outside Washington. Apparent suicide. He muttered darkly that Bill Clinton's people were &amp;quot;cleaning house,&amp;quot; and he was &amp;quot;next on the list.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Foster's death on July 20, 1993 Parks' home on Barrett Road was burglarized in a sophisticated operation that involved cutting the telephone lines and disarming the electronic alarm system. The dossier Parks had assembled at Hillary and Foster's request was stolen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two months later, in September 23, 1993, on the way back from El Chico Mexican Restaurant, at about 6:30 PM, a white Chevrolet Caprice pulled up beside him on the Chenal Parkway. An assassin let off a volley of semi-automatic fire. Parks skidded to a halt in the intersection of Highway 10. The killer jumped out and finished him off with a 9&amp;amp;nbsp;mm handgun—two more shots into the chest at point blank range. Several witnesses watched as the gunman joined his accomplice in the waiting car and sped away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[mainstream media|national media]] ignored the story of the gangland killing of the head of security of the Clinton/Gore campaign headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Little Rock Police told asked Mrs. Parks not to talk to the press until the case was solved, and she had agreed. By the spring of 1994 she was losing faith. The original detective, Tom James, had been pulled off the case. It was becoming apparent that the eyewitness accounts of the death were being ignored by the police. Witnesses had described two assassins: hefty men, with beer bellies and broad shoulders, greyish hair, in their late forties or early fifties. Yet the police kept saying that there was only one killer in the car.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jane Parks went to visit a top official from the State Police whom she knew well from church. He told her outright that the [[murder]] was a conspiracy hatched in Hot Springs by five men who moved in the social circle of Buddy Young, the former chief of Governor Clinton's security detail and now the regional director of the [[Federal Emergency Management Agency]] (FEMA) for the south-central [[United States]]. She was given the names of the five men, and was told that they flipped coins to decide which two would carry out the execution. And finally, she was told that nothing was ever going to be done about it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20040402111006/http://terpsboy.com/Articles/JerryParks.html The Secret Life Of Bill Clinton], Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/ACyGsAAjfCI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/Secret-Life-Bill-Clinton-Unreported/dp/0895264080&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Ives/Henry case ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Clinton political machine and local economy had a vested interest for enrichment of themselves by continuing illegal drug smuggling after the CIA shut down the Contra supply operation and left Arkansas. On April 23, 1987, two 16-year-old boys, Kevin Ives and Don Henry, stumbled upon and witnessed an aerial drop in the area of Bauxite and Alexander, Arkansas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.idfiles.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Initial cause of death was claimed to be the result of passing out on a railroad track in Arkansas after smoking [[marijuana]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/1988-08-14/news/mn-623_1_preliminary-report&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The ruling was made by Arkansas' State medical examiner Dr. Fahmy Malak.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/v4yO7sdYiCI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 1988, Kevin's body was exhumed, and another autopsy was performed, this one by Atlanta medical examiner Dr. Joseph Burton who discovered that Kevin died from a crushed skull prior to being placed on the tracks. Don Henry's body was exhumed and discovered to have been stabbed in the back prior to being placed on the tracks. The deaths were indeed homicides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arkansas State Police (ASP) files of the investigation report the area where the two boys' bodies were found was a drop zone for drugs. Another report was that on the night the boys were killed, two witnesses saw two [[police]] officers beat up two boys and throw them in the back of a police car a short distance from where the bodies were found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20050221103949/www.geocities.com/theoctopus22/thetraindeaths.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Brown, an investigator for the Saline County Sheriffs office, reported that Sheriff Pridgen and ex-prosecutor Jean Duffey talked to a pilot in [[Texas]] who admitted being a drug pilot and remembered that he had flown drugs to points near the Saline-Pulaski county lines, precisely where the boys' bodies were found. Prosecutor Duffey concluded the cover-up was because the drugs were Mena drugs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A federal investigation was begun, but the Assistant United States Attorney, Bob Govar, reported that the FBI and DEA did not seem interested and did not furnish much help. Other reports in the state police file revealed that residents had complained about frequent low-flying planes in the area around the tracks.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:14324699 1473274228.6179 funddescription.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Kevin Ives (right) and Don Henry (left) were the best of friends. The two were murdered when they stumbled across the Clinton network's dope and gun running operation in [[Mena Arkansas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.gofundme.com/donhenry-kevinives&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Clinton body count]] originated with the Ives/Henry case and the mysterious deaths of seven witnesses, including a case the State Coroner ruled as suicide with the deceased's head found in a dumpster several blocks away.]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the Clinton administration in September 1995, agent William Temple of Clinton's FBI office in [[Little Rock]] told Linda Ives and her husband that it might be time for her to consider that a crime was not committed although the FBI had been working for two years on the case through its agent, Phyllis Coman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 1996, the documentary, ''Obstruction of Justice'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/965M_9BCYsw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was released about the investigation into the murders and Dan Harmon's activities. John Brown, a former Saline county detective on the video, made the link between drug corruption in Saline County and drug corruption at Mena which began when Russell Welch, the Arkansas State police investigator in Mena, gave him a statement made by a confidential informant in federal prison which said the boys were killed because of the drug activity they had discovered and it was connected to the drug enterprise headquartered at Mena. The video explained what was known about Barry Seal and his use of airplanes to distribute cocaine. Brown told of reports he had found in the Saline County Sheriffs office dating back to 1987 and 1988 of residents living there where the boys' bodies were found complaining of planes flying over the tracks at 100 feet above ground level with their lights out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 1996, Linda Ives, Kevin Ives mother, got a call from Philip Weiss who told her&lt;br /&gt;
he had been asked to prepare an article in the ''New York Times Magazine'' about people who hated Clinton. Weiss explained that Mark Fabiani, a White House lawyer, provided him with a set of news clippings about people who oppose the president and among those was a story about the &amp;quot;boys on the tracks.&amp;quot; Linda Ives called Micah Morrison, an editorial page writer for the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'', who had written an article about her earlier in the year,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/MoneyInvesting/edit/o-ed4181.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; inquiring about Phillip Weiss, and telling Morrison that Weiss talked about a packet of press clippings Weiss got from Fabiani including the article Morrison had written. Morrison then made wrote an article in the ''Wall Street Journal'', January 6, 1997, in which he broke the news that the White House was distributing to reporters packets of news clips to attack victims claiming it to be &amp;quot;conspiracy theories and innuendo.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1115427-clinton-the-communication-stream-of-conspiracy.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other deaths in the Ives/Henry case ===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''James &amp;quot;Dewey&amp;quot; Milam''' – May 30, 1987. Found decapitated. Dr. Fahmy Malak, the Coroner initially ruled death due to &amp;quot;natural causes&amp;quot; and an ulcer, claiming that the victim's small dog had eaten his head. Milam's head later was recovered fully intact from a trash bin several blocks away.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Keith Coney''' – July 1988. Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Keith McMaskle''' – November 1988. Owner of a local bar. Stabbed 113 times to death.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gregory Collins''' – January 1989. Died from a gunshot wound.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Jeff Rhodes''' – April 1989. He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Richard Winters''' – July 1989. A suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Jordan Kettleson''' – June 1990. Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Eleanor Roosevelt and Huma Abedin ===&lt;br /&gt;
After the death of [[Vince Foster]], whom Hillary was very close to, she is said to have fallen into a deep depression and reached out to author William Stayron who wrote about his own struggles with depression.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/15/books/chapters/0715-1st-bernstein.html?pagewanted=all&amp;amp;_r=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to Bill Clinton, Hillary is a necromancer who communes with the spirits of the dead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRav-34ufcE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1996 [[Bob Woodward]] of the ''[[The Washington Post]]'' reported Hillary Clinton consulted psychic mediums to contact the spirit of the deceased former First Lady [[Eleanor Roosevelt]] for advice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/US/9606/22/hillary.book/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was not unprecedented, [[Mary Todd Lincoln]] held seances in the White House attempting to contact her loved ones. Hillary in many ways identified with Eleanor Roosevelt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsweek.com/hillarys-other-side-178552&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eleanor Roosevelt had been caught on surveillance &amp;quot;quite clearly having sexual intercourse&amp;quot; with a younger man, [[Joe Lash]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/File:Eroose2.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The story was leaked to the press.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=cVzNFWV_rvEC&amp;amp;pg=PA304&amp;amp;lpg=PA304&amp;amp;dq=westbrook+pegler+joe+lash&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=IMvenoPmub&amp;amp;sig=ZR7pa9GcKAsAY08BolOOHWgviPk&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwiLuJzRsJDQAhXprVQKHfV2D6kQ6AEIezAT#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=westbrook%20pegler%20joe%20lash&amp;amp;f=false]. Columnist Westbrook Pegler wrote a series of articles on Mrs. Roosevelt's relations with Joe Lash.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Eleanor arranged a sham marriage between Lash and a friend of hers', [[Gertrude Pratt]], to deflect criticism and attention. Eleanor Roosevelt's [[bisexual]]ity has become the focus of biographers and scholars.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.uis.edu/lgbtqa/eleanorroosevelt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:120726-huma-clinton.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Since 1996 the two have been together, with Abedin traveling the country as Clinton's &amp;quot;body woman.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/gallery/2013/07/how-close-are-huma-abedin-and-hillary-clinton-169489?slide=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Bill Clinton outed Hillary as a bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hollywoodlife.com/2013/09/19/hillary-clinton-bisexual-bill-clinton-gennifer-flowers-interview/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When stories of Hillary's [[lesbian]]ism abounded, Hillary held a press conference to deny the rumors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/hillary-clinton-not-lesbian-article-1.246111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Not long after, Bill Clinton presided over an informal wedding ceremony between Hillary's longtime close associate and confidant, [[Huma Abedin]], who had been working at Hillary's side since 1994, and Rep. [[Anthony Weiner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/news/dyke-hillary-dyke-hillary-6403108&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was an odd relationship between the two; Weiner lived in New York and commuted to Washington when Congress was in session; Huma, like Hillary. spent the vast majority of time away from their spouse while Hillary and Huma travelled the globe in Hillary's role as Secretary of State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pamelageller.com/2015/04/hillary-lesbian-2.html/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theamericanmirror.com/hillary-huma-make-surprise-visit-nyc-pride-parade/comment-page-4/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weiner was driven from Congress in a sexting scandal. Later it was revealed Weiner's personal computer contained more than a half million emails related to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary's email scandal. When the news broke, Hillary didn't separate herself from Huma by firing her, which Huma alone would be responsible for unauthorized State Department information being found on Anthony Weiner's personal computer. Like Nixon, she chose the path of loyalty to subordinates over making a clean break with people accused of lawbreaking, as Reagan had done when he fired [[Oliver North]] or John Kennedy when he fired [[Bay of Pigs|Allen Dulles]]. If elected, the nation faced a [[constitutional crisis]] over her actions, failures, and negligence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scandals 1975–2001, partial list ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''For a more complete list, see [[Hillary Clinton First Lady]]'' and ''[[Iran-Contra]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;{{Cquote|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;If [[Reaganomics]] works at all, Whitewater could become the Western hemisphere's Mecca.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;|20px|20px|Hillary Clinton in 1981 as reported by [[David Brock]] in ''The Seduction of Hillary Rodham'', p. 196.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=mhOoB-ejGIMC&amp;amp;pg=PA196&amp;amp;lpg=PA196&amp;amp;dq=If+reaganomics+eorks+whitewater+will+be+good&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=oNZfZNH1fw&amp;amp;sig=6oaim2Msj5o_HLBpme7LbdZ8v1c&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwjpy_Ok3bfPAhWr1IMKHQFzAqMQ6AEIJDAC#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=If%20reaganomics%20eorks%20whitewater%20will%20be%20good&amp;amp;f=false ''The Seduction of Hillary Rodham''], David Brock, Simon and Schuster, Feb 2, 1998, p. 196&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Only when she met Bill in 1971 did her political views flower and she became a [[Democrat]]. The Clinton marriage is fashioned upon precepts of ''The Art of the Deal''. She allowed him to chase any woman he saw fit, and he allowed her to run the [[Arkansas]] Governor's Mansion and [[White House]] as she saw fit.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-507762/Why-Hillary-Clinton-let-husband-Bill-seduce-woman-sight.html Why Hillary Clinton let husband Bill seduce any woman in sight], By SALLY BEDELL SMITH, 15 January 2008. www.dailymail.co.uk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was the deal Bill Clinton offered America, two for the price of one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/18/us/1992-campaign-candidate-s-wife-hillary-clinton-aspiring-first-lady-role-model.html?pagewanted=all THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: Candidate's Wife; Hillary Clinton as Aspiring First Lady: Role Model, or a 'Hall Monitor' Type?], By MAUREEN DOWD, ''New York Times'', May 18, 1992.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Arkansas State Flag.gif|right|thumb|The Arkansas State Flag. The top star above Arkansas represents the slave holding Confederacy, an Act signed into law by Clinton.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Of the two, Hillary is the actual brains of the operation. As First Lady of Arkansas, Hillary and her law partners worked with clients looting depositors' money from Arkansas Savings and Loans, which her husband regulated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-releases-office-of-independent-counsel-oic-memoranda-laying-out-criminal-case-against-hillary-clinton-in-whitewatercastle-grande-land-scandal/ Independent Counsel Memo Laying Out Criminal Case against Hillary Clinton in Whitewater Land Scandal], JANUARY 28, 2016. www.judicialwatch.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She also pocketed large amounts of cash from complicated commodity future trading straddles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/clintons-and-wall-street-24-years-enriching-each-other The Clintons and Wall Street: 24 Years of Enriching Each Other], By Richard W. Behan / CounterPunch, February 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As the family breadwinner, Hillary mocked and ridiculed stay-at-home moms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time.com/4054623/clinton-dunham-tea-cookies/ This Was the Hillary Clinton Comment That Sparked Lena Dunham's Political Awareness], Denver Nicks, ''Time'', September 29, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arkansas and United States First Lady ===&lt;br /&gt;
As First Lady she holds the distinction of being the only First Lady in [[United States]] history to come under [[criminal]] investigation, both as Arkansas First Lady and in the White House. Having escaped indictment for Whitewater crimes and lying to Congress, she was the first First Lady to run and be elected to Congress while her husband was serving as President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Travelgate (''a primer for millenials'') ===&lt;br /&gt;
As the 2016 election day approached, the elite [[mainstream media]] remained dumbfounded as to why the American people still deemed Hillary Clinton untrustworthy. The ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' revisited one of the first scandals to hit the Clinton White House:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Under criticism the White House changed its story. They said that they were just trying to cut unneeded staff and save money. Then they said they were trying to impose a competitive bidding process. They tried a new explanation&amp;amp;nbsp;— the travel office shake-up was connected to Vice President Al Gore's National Performance Review. (Almost immediately, Mr. Gore said that was not true.) The White House then said it was connected to a campaign pledge to cut the White House staff by 25%. Finally they claimed the workers hadn't been fired at all but placed on indefinite &amp;quot;administrative leave.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Sound familiar? It's just a cough&amp;amp;nbsp;... no, it's just allergies&amp;amp;nbsp;... no, it's heat and dehydration&amp;amp;nbsp;... no, it's pneumonia&amp;amp;nbsp;...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-17/why-dont-they-trust-her-look-one-hillary-clintons-first-ever-scandals&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|It emerged in contemporaneous notes of a high White House staffer that the travel-office workers were removed because Mrs. Clinton wanted to give their jobs—their &amp;quot;slots,&amp;quot; as she put it, according to the notes of director of administration David Watkins—to political operatives who'd worked for Mr. Clinton's campaign. And she wanted to give the travel office business itself to loyalists. There was a travel company based in Arkansas with long ties to the Clintons. There was a charter travel company founded by Harry Thomason, a longtime friend and fundraiser, which had provided services in the 1992 campaign. If the travel office were privatized and put to bid, he could get the business.}}&lt;br /&gt;
''Deja vu'' all over again&amp;amp;nbsp;...&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|'''Clinton Scandal Ritual:''' lie, deny, revise, claim not to remember specifics, stall for time. When it passes, call the story &amp;quot;old news&amp;quot; full of questions that have already been answered. 'As I've repeatedly said&amp;amp;nbsp;...'&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
For a quarter of a century the Clinton name has been synonymous with scandal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB887244288642713000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Death of Vince Foster ===&lt;br /&gt;
Vince Foster was the highest ranking [[Executive Branch]] official killed in office since [[John F. Kennedy]]. At the time of Kennedy's murder, the killing should have been handled by the [[Dallas]] police [[homicide]] division. However federal officials and the [[Secret Service]] removed the body and flew it back to [[Washington, D.C.]], interfering with an ongoing investigation. After that botched affair, federal laws were passed making various assaults on or killing of federal officials a federal crime. The new law made the [[FBI]] the lead agency in Foster's death investigation. Various circumstances however left the job in the hands of US Park rangers, and not even the more experienced DC homicide police were involved. Most profoundly, Bill Clinton's firing of the FBI Director the day before Foster's body was discovered in a federal park, left the Bureau stunned, leaderless, and in chaos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== FBI files relating to Hillary missing from the National Archives ====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vince-foster-murder-clinton-696x445.png|right|300px|thumb|The Vince Foster gun. The weapon used to kill Foster and the gun found at the scene, among other pertinent facts, raise inexplicable questions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
FBI files relating to Hillary's role in the [[Vince Foster]]'s death investigation are now missing from the National Archives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3753013/Missing-FBI-files-linking-Hillary-Clinton-suicide-White-House-counsel-Vince-Foster-vanished-National-Archives.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2016 presidential campaign, in August 2016 [[Vince Foster]] was back in the news. A [[fake news]] story was planted in the [[London]] ''Daily Mail'' alleging Foster killed himself because he had been humiliated by Hillary Clinton in a staff meeting one week before killing himself. This story sounds more plausible then the official explanation the ''Washington Post'' has cited for more than two decades&amp;amp;nbsp;— Beth Foster was depressed because he had done Hillary's tax returns,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See for example ''Washington Post'', &amp;quot;The 1993 suicide of White House counsel Vincent Foster, hard on the heels of the travel-office imbroglio and his filing of delinquent Whitewater Corp. tax returns.&amp;quot; [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/whitewater.htm Untangling Whitewater], By Dan Froomkin, Washingtonpost.com Staff.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there are problems with it. Mainly, that according to the First Lady's schedule now at the Clinton Library in Arkansas, Hillary Clinton was in [[Japan]] and the Far East more than two weeks before Foster's body was discovered. She returned to the United States on July 18, spent two days in Arkansas, and wasn't scheduled to return to Washington till after Foster's body was found. Numerous other sources corroborate her schedule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Illegal fundraising, 1996 ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|Chinagate fundraising scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Chinagate was a campaign finance controversy in which the Clintons illegally took money from foreign governments and military establishments. Like the Nixon administration, however, it was impossible to get the government to investigate itself, at least to any acceptable or just conclusion before the Clintons term of office was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agents of China sought to give contributions to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) before the [[United States presidential election, 1996|1996 presidential campaign]] in violation of US law barring non-American citizens from donating money to American politicians and political parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/china1.htm &amp;quot;Chinese Embassy Role In Contributions Probed&amp;quot;], ''Washington Post'', February 13, 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An unclassified [[United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs|U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs]] report issued in 1998 stated that both James Riady and his father Mochtar &amp;quot;had a long-term relationship with a Chinese intelligence agency.&amp;quot; According to journalist [[Bob Woodward]], details of the relationship came from highly classified intelligence information supplied to the committee by both the CIA and [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Woodward, Bob, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf021098.htm &amp;quot;Findings Link Clinton Allies to Chinese Intelligence&amp;quot;], ''Washington Post'', Feb. 10, 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MOCTAR.JPG|right|300px|thumb|Hillary Clinton with Mochtar Riady at a fundraiser during the [[Chinagate]] scandal. Mochtar Riady, along with Bill Clinton's financial godfather Jackson Stephens, brought the [[BCCI]] to America, a front for international dope dealers and arms traffickers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=hk7XCQAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT61&amp;amp;lpg=PT61&amp;amp;dq=mochtar+riady+bcci&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=58F2SxmNWF&amp;amp;sig=ZV6dddrtUdo7dmmCfjVhgQZOuLE&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwjpwvS7mvDTAhVH9mMKHc_MC5QQ6AEINzAG#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=mochtar%20riady%20bcci&amp;amp;f=false]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between John Huang, the Riady Family, and the Clintons, goes back to the late 1970s in Little Rock, Arkansas. The patriarch of the family, Mochtar Riady, is an [[Indonesia]]n of [[Chinese]] descent who built up the Lippo Group empire. In the mid-1970s, Mochtar Riady planned to expand his business into the United States and began looking for partners. He met the Stephens family of Arkansas and entered into various joint ventures with Stephens Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Stephens family were in fact the original owners of the American branch of the notorious [[Bank of Credit and Commerce International]] (BCCI) in a joint venture with the Riady's in the late 1970s and 1980s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;mlhttps://fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/06early.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was shut down in the early 1990s in an enormous worldwide criminal money laundering scandal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Little Rock the Riadys met then-Governor Bill Clinton and financially supported Clinton's gubernatorial campaigns throughout the 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Riady pledged $1 million in support of then-Governor Clinton's campaign for the presidency 1992, contributions made by Huang had been reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at Lippo Bank and then distributed to Huang in cash. Also, contributions made by Lippo Group entities operating in the United States were reimbursed with wire transfers from foreign Lippo Group entities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/January/017crm.htm &amp;quot;James Riady Pleads Guilty&amp;quot;], Department of Justice, press release, January 11, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/08/12/huang.sentence/ &amp;quot;Former Democratic fund-raiser John Huang pleads guilty&amp;quot;], ''CNN.com'', Aug. 12, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Huang visited the White House 78 times while working as a DNC fund-raiser.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/time9610.html &amp;quot;The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Timeline&amp;quot;], ''CNN.com'', July 1, 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; James Riady visited the White House 20 times including 6 personal visits with President Clinton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/characters.html &amp;quot;The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Cast of Characters&amp;quot;], ''CNN.com'', July 1, 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As a key fund-raiser he raised $3.4 million for the party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/huang.htm &amp;quot;Campaign Finance Key Player: John Huang&amp;quot;], ''Washington Post'', July 27, 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Immediately prior to joining the DNC, Huang worked in the Clintons' [[Commerce Department]] as deputy assistant secretary for international economic affairs giving him access to classified intelligence on China.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/US/9905/25/cox.report.highlights/ &amp;quot;Highlights of U.S. report on alleged China spying&amp;quot;], ''CNN.com'', May 25, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under questioning by Sen. Don Nickles during congressional investigations Clinton private investigator Terry Lenzner identified [[Cody Shearer]] as a liaison between Lenzner's firm, Investigative Group International, and the Cheyenne-Arapaho tribe. The tribe had donated more than $100,000 to the Democratic Party hoping that the Clinton administration would intervene on the tribes behalf in a dispute over drilling rights on tribal land. Lenzner's firm had been hired by the Clintons to discredit Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Monica Lewinsky and others, and had been retained to uncover compromising links between Sen. Don Nickles-opposed the tribe's claims—and local oil interests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Whitewater crimes ===&lt;br /&gt;
An April 10, 1998 memo in the Whitewater Office of Independent Counsel (OIC) summarized Hillary Clinton's &amp;quot;crimes under consideration&amp;quot; for [[prosecution]].&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Between January 1994 and February 1996 both Hillary Clinton and [Webster] Hubbell made numerous sworn statements to the [Resolution Trust Corporation], the FDIC, the Senate and the House of Representatives, and to the OIC. Each of these reflected and embodied materially inaccurate stories relating to: how RLF [Rose Law Firm] came to be retained by MGSL [Madison Guaranty Savings &amp;amp; Loan]; Hillary Clinton's role in the IDC/Castle Grande venture; Hillary Clinton's role in representing MGSL; Hillary Clinton's role in representing MGSL before state agencies'; Hubbell's representations to the RTC [Resolution Trust Corporation] and FDIC regarding Hillary Clinton's role in the IDC/Castle Grande venture; and the removal of records from the [Rose Law Firm].}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Chelsea Hubbell.jpg|right|375px|thumb|Webster Hubbell and Chelsea Clinton. Chelsea Clinton has become the poster child of [[white privilege]] for a generation. Webster Hubbell, an old &amp;quot;family friend,&amp;quot; gave up a lifetime appointment on the Arkansas Supreme Court to move to Washington with the Clintons and serve four years in federal prison on a fraud conviction.]]&lt;br /&gt;
According to prosecutors, Hillary drafted an option agreement that concealed from federal bank examiners a fraudulent $300,000 cross-loan in the Castle Grande transaction. Her concealment of her role in this fraudulent transaction, including the hiding of her Rose Law Firm billing records concerning her legal work for Madison, were the subject of an OIC obstruction of justice probe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memo included substantial evidence depicting Hillary, Hubbell, and Vincent Foster, as complicit in activities that &amp;quot;facilitated crimes.&amp;quot; Hubbell was convicted of fraudulent billing practices and sentenced to twenty-one months in prison and fined $135,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/05/AR2007060500908.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The memo noted that Hillary &amp;quot;destroyed&amp;quot; her personal records of her work for Madison Guaranty. The evidence covers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|'''Castle Grande.''' &amp;quot;The Castle Grande transactions were crimes.&amp;quot; The statement is followed by an explicit six-paragraph dissection of the land-flipping scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Madison Guaranty S&amp;amp;L]].''' Hillary minimized the role she played in seeking state regulatory assistance for the corrupt savings and loan, headed by key Clinton financial and political supporter [[James McDougal]]. At the time, Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Vincent Foster and the Missing Rose Law Firm Billing Records.''' The Rose billing records were a key piece of evidence in the probe. They were missing for years. After Foster's death, the OIC memo notes &amp;quot;evidence supports the inference that personal documents which Hillary Clinton did not want disclosed were located in Foster's office at the time of his death and then removed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Removal of Records from Vincent Foster's Office.''' &amp;quot; [O]n the afternoon of July 21st Bernard Nussbaum, then White House Counsel, initially agreed to allow two career DOJ employees to review the documents in Foster's office for evidence that might shed light on the cause of his death. That evening and the next morning Nussbaum, Hillary Clinton, Susan Thomases, and Maggie Williams (Hillary Clinton's chief of staff) exchanged ten separate phones calls&amp;amp;nbsp;... That morning, according to the DOJ employees, Nussbaum changed his mind and refused to allow the DOJ prosecutors to review the documents; instead, he reviewed them himself and segregated several as 'personal' to the Clintons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hiding the Billing Records.''' &amp;quot;On the evening of July 22nd, Thomas Castleton&amp;amp;nbsp;... assisted Williams [Maggie Williams, Hillary Clinton chief of staff] in carrying a box of personal documents up to&amp;amp;nbsp;... a closet in Hillary Clinton's office. The closet is approximately 30 feet from the table in the Book Room, where the billing records were found 2 years later&amp;amp;nbsp;...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Bying the Silence of a Co-Conspirator.''' Hubbell received several &amp;quot;jobs&amp;quot; from Clinton supporters for which he apparently did little or no work. During a taped conversation in prison, Hubbell appears to acknowledge that he withheld information from the OIC. Several of Hubbell's job-providers fell most strongly within the hush money allegation.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Archives is withholding additional documents critical to understanding Clinton's full role in the Whitewater scandal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-releases-office-of-independent-counsel-oic-memoranda-laying-out-criminal-case-against-hillary-clinton-in-whitewatercastle-grande-land-scandal/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Evidence tampering and obstruction ===&lt;br /&gt;
After the death of White House staffer Vince Foster, 20 year Secret Service veteran Henry O' Neill testified before Congress he observed as Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, Margaret Williams, carry boxes of papers out of Foster's office and up to the White House residence quarters on First Lady Hillary Clinton's instructions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/etc/01301996.html Whitewater Lost and Found Records], Nightline Transcripts, January 30, 1996. npr.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The documents related to work performed by Jerry Parks, the head of security for the Clinton-Gore 1992 campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://contrariansview.org/onashisite/WebVAX/Foster/AEPonQuinn10Oct96.html Ambrose Evans-Pritchard interview], Quinn in the Morning Show, WRRK 97 FM Pittsburgh, October 10, 1996&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under [[oath]], Hillary Clinton denied issuing the instructions or receiving the documents. The documents evidence in the investigation of the death of Vince Foster. Parks was gunned down in a gangland-style shooting in Arkansas two months after Foster's death.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://prorev.com/2006/08/strange-death-of-jerry-parks-and-even.htm THE STRANGE DEATH OF JERRY PARKS AND EVEN STRANGER DEATH OF DR DAVID MILLSTEIN], ''Progressive Review'', Sam Smith, Editor, August 23, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two years later in 1995 some of the evidence was retrieved from the private White House living quarters. FBI investigators determined Hillary Clinton's fingerprints were on the documents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1996-04-30/pdf/CREC-1996-04-30-pt1-PgH4166-3.pdf#page=2 &amp;quot;Remarks by Congressman (Dan) Burton of Indiana: First Lady's fingerprints on billing records&amp;quot;] (April 30, 1996). ''Congressional Record'' (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office), House of Representatives, 104th Congress, pp. H4167-8.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1996-05-10/pdf/CREC-1996-05-10-pt1-PgH4880-3.pdf#page=1 &amp;quot;Remarks by Congressman (Dan) Burton of Indiana: Mrs. Clinton's fingerprints on billing records II&amp;quot;] (May 10, 1996). ''Congressional Record'' (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office), House of Representatives, 104th Congress, pp. H4880-1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Pay-to-play pardons ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Marc Rich]] is the biggest tax cheat in American history. Rich fled the country. He was a big donor to the Clintons and the Democratic party, so [[Bill Clinton]] wanted to pardon him. [[Eric Holder]], who later served as Barack Obama's Attorney General, arranged the pardons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/16/holder.confirmation/ Former FBI director: Holder was 'used' in Rich pardon], [[CNN]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Former President [[Jimmy Carter]] publicly called it &amp;quot;disgraceful&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/carter-rich-pardon-disgraceful/ Carter: Rich Pardon 'Disgraceful'], CBSNews.com staff AP February 21, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rich's wife then donated at least $450,000 to the [[Clinton Foundation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Attacking victims of sexual assault ==&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton communications director George Stephanopoulos writes in his memoirs of the Clinton 'War Room' about assignments to belittle and kill victim's allegations of sexual abuse. &amp;quot;We have to destroy her story,&amp;quot; Mrs. Clinton instructed of Connie Hamzy, one of the first women to come forward during her husband's first presidential campaign in 1991.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2016, Esquire magazine reported on a gathering in the fashionable Upper East Side apartment of the chief executive of HBO. Several conflicted past and present Clinton surrogates discussed how the Clintons and their allies discredited women who said they had sexual encounters with, or been [[sexual assault|sexually assaulted]] by former President Bill Clinton.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|The conversation, relayed by several people with knowledge of the discussion who would speak about it only anonymously, captures the deeper debate unfolding among [[liberal]]-leaning women about how to reconcile Mrs. Clinton's leadership on women's issues with her past involvement in her husband's efforts to fend off accusations of sexual misconduct.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a41327/new-york-times-clinton-rumors/ The New York Times Is Obsessed with 2 Things. You Already Know What They Are.], By Charles P. Pierce, ''Esquire'', Jan 20, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The conundrum these conflicted Clinton surrogates face is how to explain their own past participation in sliming and vilifying women who came forward with accusations against the President of the United States with a history of untoward, and even violent, sexual misconduct to a generation of Millennials unfamiliar with the brazen history of the pair:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Even some [[Democrat]]s who participated in the effort to discredit the women acknowledge privately that today, when Mrs. Clinton and other women have pleaded with the authorities on college campuses and in workplaces to take any allegation of sexual assault and sexual harassment seriously, such a campaign to attack the women's [[character]] would be unacceptable.}}&lt;br /&gt;
But such a public campaign of abuse and ridicule of the victim ''was'' acceptable under the Clintons, by Clinton media and [[Hollywood]] surrogates. And virtually all historical and inside eyewitness accounts, dating back to Arkansas and the White House years, point to Hillary Clinton as the source who made it a mission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intimidation and blackmail ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|When Hillary hired this fleet of detectives to go around examining all of the woman who had been identified with Clinton. Not for the purpose of divorcing Clinton. Not for the purpose of getting him to stop, but for the purpose of developing blackmail material on these women to cow them into silence that had a [[Nixon]]ian quality that I hold against her and I continue to.|20px|20px|[[Dick Morris]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/video/2014/10/31/dick-morris-i-left-when-hillary-hired-secret-police-to-go-after-woman-victimized-by-bill/ Dick Morris: I Left When Hillary Hired Secret Police to Go After Woman Victimized by Bill], by [[Breitbart.com]], 31 Oct 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
One of the more abhorrent aspects of Hillary Clinton's personality is a well documented pattern by multiple Clinton confidants and advisors of intimidation and blackmail toward female victims of Mr. Bill Clinton's sexual misconduct. Mrs. Clinton is accredited with introducing the [[sexist]] [[pejorative]], 'bimbo', into the American political [[lexicon]] to disparage victims of sexual assault by the rich and powerful.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WiQRBN8igE Hillary Clinton calls Bill Clinton's sexual assault victims &amp;quot;Bimbo Eruptions&amp;quot;] youtube.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The politicalinsider.com identified the problem,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|One of the most incredible things about Hillary Clinton running for President is that there is an extraordinary long list of scandals that younger voters have never heard of. Just trying to keep up with the multiple decades of corruption and criminal activity of Bill and Hillary Clinton which happened long before the recent email scandal is overwhelming.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/a-woman-who-was-sexually-assaulted-by-bill-clinton-drops-a-bomb-on-hillary-whoa/ A Woman Who Was Sexually Assaulted by Bill Clinton Drops a BOMB on Hillary], thepoliticalinsider.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The ''New York Times'' noted before the 2016 [[primary election]] season began that the '''90s Scandals Threaten to Erode Hillary Clinton's Strength With Women'', and Hillary Clinton certainly was not, by any account, a victim, or a victim of her husband's faithlessness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/us/politics/90s-scandals-threaten-to-erode-hillary-clintons-strength-with-women.html '90s Scandals Threaten to Erode Hillary Clinton's Strength With Women], By AMY CHOZICK, ''New York Times'', JAN. 20, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the recent book, ''The Clinton's War on Women'', the authors cite a [[Sociology|sociological]] phenomena known as [[elite deviance]] in a society where the elites no longer believe the rules apply to them and their behavior is justified and facilitated by a cadre of [[sycophant]]s, [[apologist]]s, supporters, and surrogates collectively known as the Clinton smear machine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/the-hillary-clinton-smear-machine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[http://greatbookcorner.com/data/thepopularbook.site/T/the-clintons-war-on-women-roger-stone--93pfuGF9wiHCc6-8BX16-8ZvB6-8AVI6d.pdf The Clinton's War on Women]'', pp. 16-17 pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To locate, stalk, harass, and intimidate the women, Betsy Wright was put in charge of the operation. According to [[Carl Bernstein]], &amp;quot;Betsy's operation became known as 'The Defense Department', and Wright was sometimes known as the 'secretary of defense'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=KG8oDvWH3ZYC&amp;amp;pg=PT612&amp;amp;dq=Carl+Bernstein+betsey+wright+defense+department+clinton&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=x4RWU4edAcLjsATguYHYAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=Carl%20Bernstein%20betsey%20wright%20defense%20department%20clinton&amp;amp;f=false A Woman in Charge], Carl Bernstein, Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, Jun 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For this Jack Palladino, Terry Lenzner, Ivan Duda, Jerry Parks,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://bonedjello.com/Articles/The%20Murder%20of%20Jerry%20Parks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Anthony Pellicano, and others were employed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wnd.com/2005/07/31278/ The real story behind the Clinton body count], ''[[WorldNetDaily]]'', 07/13/2005. Review of Richard Poe's, ''Hillary's Secret War.'' wnd.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://alamo-girl.com/02742.htm PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INVESTIGATIVE RESOURCES], SECTION: SECRET POLICE, Revised 8/10/00. http://alamo-girl.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mega.nu/ampp/foster.html Reports Tie Clinton Sexcapades to Foster's Death]. mega.nu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Palladino was beaten to death in 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To silence the women, all sorts of threats and intimidation were common, such as murdering the family pet on the doorstep or blatant threats against the lives of their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=1v5e4lZiS08C&amp;amp;pg=PA214&amp;amp;lpg=PA214&amp;amp;dq=pellicano%2Bhillary&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=2QSRhFU8QY&amp;amp;sig=zFCzv6MqE1JDMGwraPnD1XL3TB8&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwiyuqCkgYDNAhVLz2MKHdJwA9AQ6AEI3AEwIg#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=pellicano%2Bhillary&amp;amp;f=false Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton], Kathleen Willey, WND Books, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wnd.com/2007/11/44416/ PI 'admits' Hillary paid him to harass Willey], WND, 11/07/2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Pornographer]] impresario [[Larry Flynt]] was called to boot a $1,000,000 reward to anybody to come forward with sexual innuendo, whether true or not, to attack Clinton's enemies with.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://observer.com/2000/08/its-poker-night-with-larry-flynt-porn-king-discourses-on-sex-gore/ It's Poker Night With Larry Flynt! Porn King Discourses on Sex, Gore], By Andrew Goldman, ''New York Observer'', 08/28/00&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sexual blackmail of political opponents ====&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary's obsession with sexual blackmail isn't limited to compromising and silencing disgruntled mistresses or women Bill Clinton assaulted, it became a ready tool against political opponents as well. Hillary Rodham Clinton has an obsession with opposition research and digging up dirt on opponents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/hillary-clinton-already-knows-the-bad-thing-you-said?utm_term=.ry2yGw3Go#.of4rD4yDJ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As Hillary's emails reveal, she often spent more time studying domestic critics views of her activities than the actual job of secretary of state. A new generation of millennials is becoming familiar with the term, &amp;quot;oppo&amp;quot;, which is the first step in blackmailing and silencing media critics or candidates for public office. The Clintons have raised it from muckraking and [[dirty tricks]] to a high art form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To political opponents and the women, Clinton surrogates routinely use the material, truth not being a factor, dug up by Hillary's investigator's to slime anyone publicly who wouldn't fall into line. A recent lawsuit filed just days after it became evident Trump was considering using the case of Joe Epstein in the election is intended to neutralize criticism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/EPlDvVwER7A&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And the surrogates relish their jobs. Indeed, many Clinton supporters believe this is the essence of [[politics]]&amp;amp;nbsp;— slander, defamation, and demonization of living human beings&amp;amp;nbsp;— not formulation or discussion of public policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In what perhaps may or may not be a [[Freud]]ian slip Hillary Clinton titled her last book, ''Hard Choices''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rape allegations ===&lt;br /&gt;
==== As Arkansas Attorney General ====&lt;br /&gt;
The general pattern of the Clintons being above the law is illustrated the Juanita Broadderick case from 1978.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rumors circulated about Broaddrick's allegations for many years, but she refused to speak to the media. In an interview with ''Dateline NBC,'' that aired after the impeachment trial, Broaddrick claimed she had indeed been [[rape]]d by then Arkansas [[Attorney General]] Bill Clinton.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''Dateline NBC'': February 24, 1999. ''The Washington Post'' [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/broaddrick022599.htm published a story about the interview] on February 25, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The abuse put Broadderick in a quandry: who could she turn for help in a case against the state's highest ranking [[law enforcement]] official?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broaddrick first met Clinton when he made a visit to her nursing home during his first gubernatorial bid. Broaddrick offered to volunteer for the campaign, and Clinton invited her to stop by the campaign office in Little Rock.&amp;lt;ref name=NYT&amp;gt;''New York Times'': [https://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/24/us/on-tortuous-route-sexual-assault-accusation-against-clinton-resurfaces.html On Tortuous Route, Sexual Assault Accusation Against Clinton Resurfaces]. February 24, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She contacted the office a few weeks later when she was in Little Rock for a nursing home conference. Clinton said he would not be in the office that day and suggested they meet at her hotel's coffee shop instead. Upon his arrival, however, he allegedly requested that they instead have coffee in her room to avoid a crowd of reporters in the lobby. Broaddrick agreed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broaddrick says the two spoke briefly in her room, then Clinton suddenly kissed her.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Broaddrick pushed Clinton away and told him she was married and not interested, but he persisted. As recounted in the NBC interview:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|&amp;quot;Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip&amp;amp;nbsp;... He starts to bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him 'No,' that I didn't want this to happen but he wouldn't listen to me. ...&amp;amp;nbsp;It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to 'Please stop.' And that's when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip. ...&amp;amp;nbsp;When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says 'You better get some ice on that.' And he turned and went out the door.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
When asked if there was any way Clinton could have thought it was consensual, Broaddrick said &amp;quot;No, not with what I told him and with how I tried to push him away. It was not consensual.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broaddrick shared the hotel room with her friend and employee Norma Rodgers. Rodgers attended a conference seminar that morning, and says she returned to their room to find Broaddrick on the bed &amp;quot;in a state of shock,&amp;quot; her pantyhose torn in the crotch and her lip swollen as though she had been hit.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NYT&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Rogers says Broaddrick told her Clinton had &amp;quot;forced himself on her.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NYT&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Rogers helped Broaddrick ice her lip, and then the women left Little Rock. Rogers said that Broaddrick was very upset on the way home and blamed herself for letting Clinton in the room.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broaddrick says she did not tell her then-husband about the incident.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Slate&amp;gt;[http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/1999/03/is_juanita_broaddrick_telling_the_truth.html &amp;quot;Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?&amp;quot;]. ''Slate'' (magazine)''. March 3, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the time, she was having an affair with her eventual second husband, David Broaddrick. He remembers her injured lip, and she told him that Clinton had raped her.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Three other friends confirmed that Broaddrick had told them about the incident at the time: Susan Lewis, Louis Ma, and Jean Darden, Norma Rogers' sister.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broaddrick recalled incident occurred in the spring of 1978 and that she had stayed in the Camelot Hotel. Records show Broaddrick attended a nursing home meeting at the Camelot Hotel in Little Rock on April 25, 1978.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Slate&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The Clinton White House would not respond to requests for Clinton's official schedule for the date,&amp;lt;ref name=WashingtonPost-Feb25-1999 /&amp;gt; but news reports suggest that he was in Little Rock that day, with no official commitments in the morning.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three weeks later Broaddrick attended an event where the Clintons would be in attendance at the home of a local dentist.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Broaddrick said she was &amp;quot;in denial,&amp;quot; and felt guilty, thinking that she had given Clinton the wrong idea by letting him into her room.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; When she arrived she says, her friend who had picked the Clintons up from the airport told her that Hillary Clinton had asked if she would be at the event.&amp;lt;ref name=FOXinterview&amp;gt;''FOX News'': Interview with Sean Hannity. June 10, 2003. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KZ8ICvutc0 Excerpt] available via YouTube.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Broaddrick says Clinton did not speak to her at the event, but his wife Hillary approached her, took her hand, and said 'I just want you to know how much Bill and I appreciate what you do for him.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FOXinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; When Broaddrick moved her hand away, she says, Mrs. Clinton held on to her and said, &amp;quot;Do you understand? Everything that you do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FOXinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Broaddrick says she felt [[nausea]]ted and left the gathering. Broaddrick says she interpreted the incident as Mrs. Clinton thanking her for keeping quiet.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FOXinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, Broaddrick's nursing facility was adjudged the best in the state, which brought a congratulatory official letter from the governor. On the bottom was a handwritten note from Clinton, saying, &amp;quot;I admire you very much.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=WSJ&amp;gt;''Wall Street Journal'': [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB919379691540145000.html Juanita Broaddrick Meets the Press]. February 19, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Broaddrick said that in 1991, Clinton called her out of a state nursing standards meeting to try to apologize. In response to his apologies, as she told ''[[The Washington Post]]'', &amp;quot;I told him to go to hell, and I walked off&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=WashingtonPost-Feb25-1999&amp;gt;Kurtz, Howard (February 25, 1999). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/broaddrick022599.htm &amp;quot;Clinton Accuser's Story Aired&amp;quot;]. ''[[The Washington Post]]''. p. A15.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Darden also attended the meeting, and said she saw Broaddrick talking to Clinton in the hallway.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lisa Myers if NBC, who conducted the ''Dateline'' interview, added she had no reason to doubt the veracity of Broadderick's accusations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== As Rhodes Scholar ====&lt;br /&gt;
An instance of media coverup, or failing to ask the right questions while promoting the Clintons and their careers is illustrated in Clinton's time at Oxford University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The earliest known incident of a reported rape is from 1969 while at Oxford in England on the&lt;br /&gt;
[[Rhodes Scholar]]ship program. As is common knowledge, women's rights, [[prosecution]] of offenders, and protection for rape victims in 1969 were not what they are today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prestigious Rhodes Scholarship is an elite program intended to cement Anglo-American relations and train tomorrows world leaders. Clinton was recommended for the program in 1968 by his Georgetown Professor Carol Quigley and his political mentor, the notorious [[segregation]]ist Senator J. William Fulbright. It's a two-year program. Clinton received a draft deferment from conscription into the US Army during the Vietnam war for his enrollment in the program. It has been stated that 99% of all Rhodes Scholars graduate, the only cause of failing to graduate being death. Dropping out, or being thrown out, is/was virtually unheard of.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eileen Wellstone is an English woman who came forward saying Clinton raped her in 1969 after she had met him at a pub near the University. A retired State Department employee confirmed that he spoke with the family. The employee said he believed the story of Miss Wellstone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20070516192906/http:/chblue.com/Feb1999/022599/clintonwomen022599.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman had suffered severe emotional trauma, But we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with rape.&amp;quot; The State Department official who investigated the incident said Clinton's interests appeared to be drinking, drugs and sex, not studies. &amp;quot;I came away from the incident with the clear impression that this was a young man who was there to party, not study.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://albertpeia.com/oxfordassault.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The victim's family declined to pursue the case; Wellstone re-confirmed the incident in 1999, but asked to be left alone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/jun/24/20040624-121742-7463r/?page=all |title=The missing Clinton women|author=The Washington Times | publisher= Washington Times |date= June 24, 2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his book, ''Unlimited Access'', former FBI agent [[Gary Aldrich]] reported that Clinton left Oxford University for a &amp;quot;European Tour&amp;quot; in 1969 and was told by University officials that he was no longer welcome there. Aldrich said Clinton's academic record at Oxford was lackluster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having been thrown out of Oxford, Clinton lost his draft deferment. Clinton entered Oxford in October 1968, according to David Maraniss, and received a draft induction in late July 1969. Yet the focus of news reporting in the [[United States presidential election, 1992|1992 presidential election]] was on championing Clinton as a 'Rhodes Scholar' while never asking how it was possible for a Rhodes Scholar with a draft deferment to receive a draft notice. The issue focused on his failure to report for induction rather than the fact that he ''was not'' a Rhodes Scholar, that he had been thrown out of Oxford, or the reason for being thrown out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Other assaults ====&lt;br /&gt;
Most cited by name in this section of assault victims are of women who have spoken about the crimes they've suffered, although some have been intimidated into silence after going public. Others remain fearful to come forward.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1972, a twenty-two-year-old woman told Yale University's campus police that she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton, and although no charges were filed, a retired policeman confirmed the incident to ''Capitol Hill Blue''. The woman herself was also tracked down and confirmed it, though she elected to stay anonymous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1974 a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then law school instructor Bill Clinton tried to prevent her from leaving his office during a conference, groping her and forcing his hand inside her blouse. Although she complained to her faculty advisor, who confronted Clinton, the complaint again failed to go anywhere. The student left the school shortly after the incident, and more recently confirmed the incident. Several former students also confirmed the incident in confidential interviews and also said there were other reports of Clinton attempting to force himself on female students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arkansas state troopers assigned to protect Clinton have knowledge of at least seven other complaints from women who said Clinton forced himself on them sexually or attempted to do so.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.shwiggie.com/articles/clintons.html Living with the Clintons, Bill's Arkansas bodyguards tell the story the press missed], By David Brock, 1993&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Little Rock legal secretary named Carolyn Moffet claimed that in 1979, she met the governor at a political fundraiser and shortly afterward received an invitation to meet him in a hotel room. She was escorted there by a state trooper. When she arrived he was sitting on a couch wearing an undershirt and nothing else, and angrily assaulted her. She was able to escape before being raped. Moffet received threatening phone calls. &amp;quot;He said that people who crossed the governor usually regretted it and that if I knew what was good for me I'd forget that it ever happened&amp;amp;nbsp;... I haven't forgotten it. You don't forget crude men like that.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2014/12/15/why-hillary-is-not-inevitable-bills-sordid-past/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elizabeth Ward Gracen, a former Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982 told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state crown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/news/the-trashing-of-clintons-women-6422690&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Clinton media surrogates publicly hype and boast of Clinton's manliness and ''machismo'' for his sexual conquest if Miss America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An Arkansas state employee named Paula Corbin filed a sexual harassment case against Clinton after she said the governor exposed himself and demanded sex in a Little Rock hotel room. President Clinton finally settled the case with Paula Corbin in 1998 with an $850,000 cash payment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/11/18/jones/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sandra Allen James, a former Washington, DC, political fundraiser said Clinton invited her to his hotel room when he was in Washington in 1991, pinned her against the wall and stuck his hand up her dress. She says she screamed loud enough for the Arkansas state trooper stationed outside the hotel suite to bang on the door and ask if everything was alright. Then, she said, Clinton released her and she fled the room. When she reported the incident to her boss, he advised her to keep her mouth shut if she wanted to keep working. ''My husband and children deserve better than that..I wasn't raped, but I was trapped in a hotel room for a brief moment by a boorish man&amp;amp;nbsp;... I got away. He tried calling me several times after that, but I didn't take his phone calls. Then he stopped. I guess he moved on.&amp;quot; She said she learned other women had similar stories during Clinton's 1992 presidential run. She has since married and left Washington and retreated from public view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://m.digitaljournal.com/article/255828&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christy Zercher, a flight attendant on Clinton's campaign plane in 1992, reported that he exposed himself to her, groped her, and made explicit sexual remarks. A video filmed on board the plane by [[ABC News]] showed an obviously drunken Clinton with his hand on intimate parts of another young flight attendant. Zercher said later in an interview that White House attorney Bruce Lindsey tried to pressure her into not going public about the assault.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://redalertpolitics.com/2015/12/29/millennials-guide-bill-clintons-20-sex-scandals/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kathleen Willey was a volunteer at the White House when Clinton grabbed her, fondled her, and pressed her hand against himself during an Oval Office meeting in November, 1993. Willey, who told her story in a [[60 Minutes]] interview, became a target of a White House–directed smear campaign after she went public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.amazon.com/Target-Caught-Crosshairs-Hillary-Clinton/dp/0974670162 Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton], Kathleen Willey, World Ahead Publishing, Nov 6, 2007 ISBN 978-0974670164 ISBN 0974670162&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1998, just before Willey was to testify in the Paula Jones trial, Willey had a disturbing encounter where she was approached by a jogger near her home. The complete stranger asked her menacing questions about her children, naming them by name. According to Willey, &amp;quot;I'll never forget that look in his eyes&amp;amp;nbsp;... He just looked at me and he said, 'You're just not getting the message, are you?'&amp;quot; On Hardball in 1999, [[MSNBC]] host [[Chris Matthews]] identified the mysterious jogger as [[Cody Shearer]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.weeklystandard.com/the-other-secret-dossier/article/2011477&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other encounters were confirmed with more than 30 interviews with retired Arkansas state employees, former state troopers and former Yale and University of Arkansas students. Like others, they refused to go public because of fears of retaliation from the Clinton White House and smesr machine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peter Baker in ''The Breach: Inside the Impeachment and Trial of William Jefferson Clinton'', which the ''Washington Post'' describes as the definitive account of the impeachment saga, reported that in the files of the independent prosecutor lawyers had collected the names of 21 different women. Baker noted&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|&amp;quot;One woman was alleged to have been asked by Clinton to give him oral sex in a car while he was the state attorney general (a claim she denied). A former Arkansas state employee said that during a presentation, then-Governor Clinton walked behind her and rubbed his pelvis up against her repeatedly. A woman identified as a third cousin of Clinton's supposedly told her drug counselor during treatment in Arkansas that she was abused by Clinton when she was baby-sitting at the Governor's Mansion in Little Rock.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.amazon.com/The-Breach-Inside-Impeachment-William/dp/1476730075 The Breach: Inside the Impeachment and Trial of William Jefferson Clinton], Peter Backer, December 4, 2012, p. 138&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 21, 2014, columnist Joan Vennochi of the ''a [[The Boston Globe]]'' wrote, &amp;quot;Rape allegations hurt Bill Cosby but sail past Bill Clinton.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Power—who has it, who doesn't, and how it can for years insulate the holder of it—is the common thread between Cosby, Clinton, and their accusers,&amp;quot; Vennochi wrote. Clinton apologists, surrogates, sycophants, and spin-meisters srgur their public policies are more important than his private failings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Meanwhile, the Clinton spin machine did its best to portray his accusers as 'nuts or sluts,'&amp;amp;nbsp;... against women who dare to hold men accountable for their actions,&amp;quot; Vennochi wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/11/21/rape-allegations-hurt-bill-cosby-but-sail-past-bill-clinton/YTIsUoXS2uxrW1mW2JSuRM/story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Defends a pedophile ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Epstein-bill-clinton-1200x630.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Bill Clinton with Clinton Foundation co-founder Jeffrey Epstein.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The next job after the Children's Defense Fund the self described 'defender of children' handled was the case of a 41-year-old man who raped a 12-year-old girl. The rapist, facing 30 years to life in prison, Hillary plea bargained down to time served&amp;amp;nbsp;— two months in county jail&amp;amp;nbsp;— by attacking the victim who was to young to testify in a court of law to defend herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://freebeacon.com/politics/audio-hillary-clinton-speaks-of-defense-of-child-rapist-in-newly-unearthed-tapes/ AUDIO: Hillary Clinton Speaks of Defense of Child Rapist in Newly Unearthed Tapes], Washington Free Beacon Staff, June 15, 2014. freebeacon.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In court documents Hillary wrote to the judge about the young victim as:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing&amp;amp;nbsp;... children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents in disorganized families, such as the complainant's, are even more prone to exaggerate behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.intellihub.com/video-hillary-clinton-brags-getting-pedophile-off-hook/ Video: Hillary Clinton brags about getting a pedophile off the hook], By Brandon Turbeville, January 25, 2016. www.intellihub.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006 the victim, now an adult heard for the first time Hillary Clinton laughing about her victory in the case. The victim spoke out,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Hillary Clinton took me through hell. ...&amp;amp;nbsp;You took a case of mine in '75, you lied on me&amp;amp;nbsp;... I realize the truth now, the heart of what you've done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing. ...&amp;amp;nbsp;she lied like a dog on me. I think she was trying to do whatever she could do to make herself look good&amp;amp;nbsp;...&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html She Lied: 'Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell,' Rape Victim Says], Josh Rogan, ''The Daily Beast'', 06.20.14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mrs. Clinton knew the child rapist to be guilty, and joked about it. Clinton mainstream surrogates, apologists, and sycophants [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/spin%20control spin] the episode to prove how 'tough minded', 'dedicated, and 'fair' she is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014 Hillary Clinton again lied about the case claiming she asked to be relieved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2014/jul/17/did-hillary-clinton-ask-be-relieved-rapist/ Politifact: Did Hillary Clinton ask to be 'relieved' from representing an accused rapist in 1970s?], By Steve Contorno, July 17th, 2014. politifact.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Jeffrey Epstein ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Epstein Mardi Gras.PNG|right|350px|thumb|The 'Epstein didn't kill himself' [[Mardi Gras]] float depicting Hillary Clinton with a noose around Jeffrey Epstein's neck.]]&lt;br /&gt;
When the Clintons left the White House in 2001, Bill became a friend and business associate with a character known in the media as 'the billionaire pervert'. His new friend is involved in a child sex trafficking ring. He is a registered sex offender for sex crimes involving children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2011/02/28/jeffrey-epstein-sex-offender-yes-billionaire-no/#669f83922136&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton's [[pedophile]] friend and associate, [[Jeffrey 'Joe' Epstein]], is a donor to the [[Clinton Foundation]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/07/06/billionaire-sex-offender-epstein-once-claimed-co-founded-clinton-foundation.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He began making donations shortly after his arrest on child sex charges. Epstein received a relatively light sentence in view of the charges against him.[[Joe Epstein]] settled lawsuits with 33 of his child victims. Other suits are still pending.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html#ixzz3NysnRS27&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Epstein is said to have provided minor girls for Prince Andrew. When the Palm Beach Florida police seized Epstein's contact book,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/bill-clinton/bill-clinton-and-jeffrey-epstein-9086711&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; 21 different phone numbers and email addresses for Clinton machine operatives were discovered, including the personal cell number for Bill Clinton, and numbers for Bill's flunky Doug Band and Hillary's flunky Cheryl Mills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2015/03/27/cheryl-mills-the-woman-who-knew-too-much/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Epstein owns property in Manhattan, Palm Beach and the Virgin Islands where the child molestation acts are said to have taken place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nypost.com/2011/02/25/billionaire-jeffrey-epstein-im-a-sex-offender-not-a-predator/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Seized flight logs in the investigation reveal Clinton flew on Epstein's private plane 18 times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/05/18/morning_joe_panel_clintons_connection_to_billionaire_pedophile_jeffrey_epstein_will_blow_up_campaign.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It has been established some of these flights were to Epstein's Virgin Islands retreat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/07/judge-unseals-more-details-in-jeffrey-epstein-underage-sex-lawsuit-210065&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A woman who victims name as procurring underage girls is s donor to the Hiilary Clinton Presidential campaign and attended Chelsea Clinton's wedding in 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://snn.bz/clinton-4ss/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007 former Whitewater prosecutor [[Ken Starr]], whom critics accuse of whitewashing the Vince Foster investigation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prorev.com/knowl2a.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; defended Epstein from a second conviction of having sex with a 14 year old minor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.justice-integrity.org/faq/791-ken-starr-explains-his-help-for-billionaire-pervert-jeffrey-epstein&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Starr was forced out of his position as president of Baylor University in May 2016 for mishandling another sex scandal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Racism ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also [[Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential campaign]]'' and ''[[Bill and Hillary Clinton and racism]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Bill and Hillary Clinton are known for there cynical manipulation of Black voters and pandering to &amp;quot;white working class, hard-working white&amp;quot; nativist sentiment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/vjoMcqMTMfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/ijhL3-5sr18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Reminiscent of her famous &amp;quot;bring them to heel&amp;quot; speech, while discussing police shootings [[Hillary Clinton]] said, &amp;quot;We have got to rein in what is absolutely inexplicable&amp;quot; without bothering to explain what is inexplicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary's racism runs deep. The night [[Bill Clinton]] lost his bid for a Congressional seat in 1974 and disappointing their immediate personel ambitions, Hillary blamed the loss on campaign manager Paul Fray. &amp;quot;She called me everything but a white man,&amp;quot; Fray explained to the [[BBC]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/_VonG4TyTWw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Tensions escalated. Then she called him a &amp;quot;F***ing [[Jew]] bastard.&amp;quot; The Cinton's of course deny it but five separate surviving witnesses corroborate each other in detail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2016/07/05/three-eyewitnesses-allege-hillary-called-aide-a-fking-jew-bastard/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Did Hillary commit a hate crime&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200007/ai_n8910772 Did Hillary commit a hate crime?], Human Events, July 28, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The incident was first reported in a book published by Harper Collins in 2000 entitled, ''State of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton''.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Did Hillary commit a hate crime&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/State-Union-Complex-Marriage-Hillary/dp/0060193921&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/US_election_race/Story/0,,344475,00.html Hillary faces voters' wrath for alleged ethnic slur], Michael Ellison, London Guardian, July 18, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sobran.com/columns/1999-2001/000718.shtml Hillary's Manners], Joseph Sobran, July 18, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15015 I agree with Clinton!], Joseph Farah, WorldNetDaily, July 20, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The New Jim Crow ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|The New Jim Crow}}&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Clintons, more the 250,000 [[African American]]s were imprisoned in the [[United States]] than under President Reagan,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.blackelectorate.com/articles.asp?ID=320&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a fact for which she takes credit for.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thenation.com/article/hillary-clinton-does-not-deserve-black-peoples-votes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cumulatively, since Clinton signed the [[Biden Crime Bill]], 2.5 million adult black males—more than 10% of the population—have been incarcerated leaving untold damage on black families.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prisonpolicy.org/research/incarceration_rates_growth_causes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary's divisiveness and hate is targeted at a diverse group of people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/yu9OH_KfPXA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hillary has publicly advocated treating minority youth like dogs,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsSDqbot-EI Hillary Clinton on &amp;quot;Superpredators&amp;quot;], Mrs. Clinton Campaign Speech Keene State University, January 25, 1996. youtube.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has made mocking and offensive comments about [[Jews]] and retarded children, and has called common American [[citizen]]s deplorables.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/09/12/clinton-and-doeplorables-her-comments-about-trump-voters-her-fellow-americans-show-why-she&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These sentiments have been confirmed by Hillary's campaign chair, Mr. John Podesta, and her campaign manager, [[Robby Mook]]. According to all major, reputable sources, [[Hillary Clinton]] and/or her organization and its surrogates started the [[birther movement]] to discredit Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/bifsEkjTAc8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Her declining health and criminal investigation became an issue in her 2016 presidential campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://youtu.be/Zr1IDQ2V1eM Hillary Clinton's Illness Revealed], Dr. Ted Noel, VidZette.com, Aug. 29, 2016. youtube.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Jesse Jackson ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Clintons call [[Jesse Jackson]] that &amp;quot;Goddamn n****r&amp;quot; behind his back.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://polidics.com/news/hillary-clintons-jew-bastard.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rapmusic.com/threads/hillary-clinton-hates-blacks-and-jews-caught-by-the-secret-service-and-endorsers.1074368/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emptysuit.wordpress.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://emptysuit.wordpress.com/2010/08/02/the-clintons-jews-and-niggers-warning-graphic-language/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theblaze.com/contributions/racial-slurs-are-unsettling-if-used-by-celebrity-chefs-or-top-democrats/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jackson refused to release his delegates in 1984 to [[Gary Hart]], Clinton's old boss from the [[McGovern]] campaign of 1972. Jackson, the first African-American to win states in a major party primary, questioned the disparity between his vote total and delegate count, but even Hart sided with the DNC's rigging the primary rules.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/1984/05/20/us/disparity-between-jackson-s-vote-and-delegate-count-vexes-party.html?pagewanted=all DISPARITY BETWEEN JACKSON'S VOTE AND DELEGATE COUNT VEXES PARTY], By DAVID E. ROSENBAUM, ''New York Times'', May 20, 1984.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1988 Jackson selected Ron Brown as his chief negotiator at the 1988 Democratic National Convention.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://socialistworker.org/2016/07/25/how-democrats-got-over-the-rainbow&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Brown went on to serve as DNC Chairman and Commerce Secretary until he died in a plane crash.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/Ron-Browns-Body-Presidency-Hillarys/dp/0785262377&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Democratic Leadership Council ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Democratic Leadership Council}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) was a racist organization formed by remnants of the McGovern and Hart campaigns&amp;amp;nbsp;— less the [[Rainbow Coalition]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.blackcommentator.com/46/46_cover.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ofamerica.wordpress.com/tag/democratic-leadership-council/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1992 it had taken over the DNC. Democratic strategists sought to distance themselves from the civil rights movement and begin pushing the &amp;quot;centrist&amp;quot; candidacy of Bill Clinton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.salon.com/2016/01/31/the_clintons_sordid_race_game_no_one_will_say_it_but_the_clintons_rise_was_premised_on_repudiating_black_voters/ The Clintons' sordid race game: No one will say it, but the Clintons' rise was premised on repudiating black voters], Corey Robin, ''Salon'', Jan 31, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That fact that 30-year-old allegations of sexual assault and improprieties are hurled at [[Bill Cosby]] with a devastating effect on his life and career while Bill Clinton is held up as a paragon of manhood and public service by the media and judicial system is a testament of the bigotry and racism of the mainstream media and their supporters. Rumors persist that the Clintons have effectively blackmailed Barack Obama to drop the email investigation and for his active support in the 2016 presidential campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/07/media-gets-facts-wrong-on-loretta-lynchbill-clinton-tarmac-meeting/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Voting rights violations ===&lt;br /&gt;
In Arkansas, the Clinton administration was sued several times by blacks and [[Hispanic]]s for violations of the 1965 [[Voting Rights Act]] and lost every case. 10 years into their grip on Arkansas the [[United States Supreme Court]] ruled&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|violations of the [[Fourteenth amendment|fourteenth]] or [[fifteenth amendment]] justifying equitable relief have occurred in Arkansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 1990, the district court turned to those claims, holding that &amp;quot;the State of Arkansas has committed a number of constitutional violations of the voting rights of black citizens.&amp;quot; In particular, the court determined that the &amp;quot;State has systematically and deliberately enacted new majority-vote requirements for municipal offices, in an effort to frustrate black political success in elections traditionally requiring only a plurality to win.&amp;quot; In 1990&amp;amp;nbsp;... Devotion to majority rule for local offices lay dormant as long as the [[plurality]] system produced white office-holders. But whenever black candidates used this system successfully -- and victory by a plurality has been virtually their only chance of success in at-large elections in majority-white cities – the response was swift and certain. Laws were passed in an attempt to close off this avenue of black political victory&amp;amp;nbsp;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This series of laws represents a systematic and deliberate attempt to reduce black political opportunity. Such an attempt is plainly unconstitutional. It replaces a system in which blacks could and did succeed, with one in which they almost certainly cannot. The inference of [[bigotry|racial motivation]] is inescapable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Findings of the Supreme Court of the United States in [http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/1990/sg900402.txt Clinton vs Jeffers] No. 90-394 (1990) on appeal 730 F. Supp. 196, 198-201 (ED Ark. 1989) (three-judge court), aff'd, No. 89-2008 (Jan. 7, 1991).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://commonsensewonder.blogspot.com/2016/09/bill-clintons-comment-about-trumps-make.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In more than one thousand legislative elections, the Arkansas delta region sent not one black to the legislature. In 1988 the federal district court forced a change to the system in Crittenden County that watered down the presence of a large number of black voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The case began when blacks in Crittenden County filed a voting rights lawsuit attacking the county's ''at-large'' system for electing two members to the Arkansas House. The suit contended that the system deprived black voters of a chance to elect a black to the state assembly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The evidence at trial was indeed overwhelming that the Voting Rights Act had been violated. Plaintiffs offered plenty of proof of monolithic voting along racial lines, intimidation of black voters and candidates, other official acts that made voting harder for blacks. A panel of 3 judges ordered Clinton, the Attorney General, and Secretary of State to redraw the boundaries to give maximum strength to black voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Local press reports in Arkansas from the late 1980s paint an ugly picture of the [[Clinton administration]]'s attempts to intimidate black voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readreplies.aspx?subjectid=28880&amp;amp;msgid=18476315&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In her 1998 memoir ''Lift Every Voice'', former [[U.S Justice Department]] Civil Rights Division nominee Lani Guinier revealed that Clinton's record on [[race]] in Arkansas was so bad she was forced to take legal action. &amp;quot;As a staff lawyer for the [[NAACP]] Legal Defense and Education Fund [LDF], I had sued Gov. Clinton over Arkansas's deputy voter registration statute.&amp;quot; A deputy voter registrar is someone authorized to register voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guinier wrote, &amp;quot;In the late 1980s, in a particularly tense meeting in southeastern Arkansas&amp;amp;nbsp;— a section of the Mississippi Delta region where antebellum social relations are still in many respects the order of the day,&amp;quot; Dayna Cunningham, a civil rights lawyer, &amp;quot;were one of a handful of black people there to discuss remedies for a highly contentious LDF voting rights suit. The meeting turned sour when one of the local whites demanded to know why, in his view, the whites were always made to pay for others' problems. Other whites in the group began to echo his charge&amp;amp;nbsp;... Bill Clinton, the lead defendant in the case, took to the podium to respond. In a tone of resignation, Clinton said, 'We have to pay because we lost,'&amp;quot; the inference being the loss of the [[Civil War]] as well as the Clintons loss in the Supreme Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Clinton had irresponsibly pandered to the backwards feeling of the white constituency,&amp;quot; said Cunningham.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No good deed goes unpunished of course, so Guinier was not without her own problems for having unfortunately crossed paths with the Clintons, beginning at Yale. Three years after the ruckus in Arkansas President Clinton nominated her as Deputy Attorney General for Civil Rights. But the Clinton surrogates were lying in wait for her. A media smear campaign not only distorted her views, but in many cases presented them as the exact opposite. The ''New York Times'', which ordinarily presents the Clintons as the wonders of an age, ran an op-ed highly critical of Clinton's appointment, alleging Guinier was in favor of &amp;quot;[[segregation|segregating]] black voters in black-majority districts.&amp;quot; The ''Washington Post'', again no friend of conservatives, twisted Guiniers advocacy of proportional representation into a vision of &amp;quot;a society in which a minority can impose its will on the majority.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting says of the ambush and firestorm that surrounded Guinier's nomination:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|there was also an ideological agenda at work: promoting Clinton's media-celebrated shift &amp;quot;back to the center.&amp;quot; ...&amp;amp;nbsp;To make her a proper sacrificial offering, however, the establishment media had to reinvent Guinier&amp;amp;nbsp;— transforming a sophisticated advocate of racial reconciliation and participatory democracy into a sinister, [[race baiting|race-baiting]] enemy of the American Way.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://fair.org/extra/lani-guinier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats held both Houses of Congress and the presidency. Guinier's nomination, if the Clintons were serious about it should have been easy. She had been Hillary snd Bill's classmate at Yale. It was classic ''Clintonism'': destroying the life of a friend and who was an advocate of racial reconciliation, painting the American people as racist, and promoting themselves. [[George Will]], it has been said, was too stupid and too lazy to actually read her writtings. As [[Mike Klonsky]] noted, when the liberal lions of the Democratically controlled Senate, such as [[Ted Kennedy]] and even [[Carole Moseley Braun]] stepped away, now the Clintons could turn a message of reconciliation into repudiation in front of the whole nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's a little misunderstanding among friends? Guinier said she felt betrayed by Clinton, whom she considered a friend since their days together at Yale Law School, and was angered when he called her &amp;quot;anti-democratic,&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp;— the person who protected voting rights of African-Americans despite Clinton's fight against it&amp;amp;nbsp;— in a nationally televised address announcing he was scuttling her nomination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.c-span.org/video/?42098-1/assistant-attorney-general-nomination&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rep. Ben McGee ===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1988 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Clinton wrongfully tried to overturn the election of a black state representative, Mr. Ben McGee, and replace him with a white Democrat Clinton handpicked. The case grew out of the suit against Clinton to win voting rights for the people of Crittenden County.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Robert 'Say' MacIntosh ===&lt;br /&gt;
Robert 'Say' MacIntosh is a civil rights activist who the ''Arkansas Democrat'' newspaper named Arkansan of the Year in the late 1970s for his charitable work with children in Little Rock's housing projects.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20080926012344/http://www.cals.lib.ar.us/butlercenter/manuscripts/collection/mss97-43.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; MacIntosh unsuccessfully ran for public office under Arkansas's racial gerrymanderring and minority [[voter suppression]] laws of the Clinton era, including as Lieutenant Governor in 1980. He considered challenging Bill Clinton in the 1986 Democratic gubernatorial primary, but backed out when another African-American candidate, former anti-poverty agency head W. Dean Goldsby, filed on the last day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tree was ceremoniously planted on the Arkansas capitol grounds in the Clinton years on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day to honor Dr. King. McIntosh showed up the next day and chopped it down in front of the press, and commented, &amp;quot;No black man was invited to be present for the tree planting. I'm cutting it down till blacks are invited to be part of the political process in Little Rock.&amp;quot; Wikipedia says &amp;quot;few debate that he has been a major part of local color in Arkansas.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_&amp;quot;Say&amp;quot;_McIntosh&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacIntosh publicized allegations Bill Clinton fathered an out of wedlock child named Danney Williams.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/danney_williams?s=09&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Bill Clinton was in Little Rock, McIntosh would distribute leaflets within a five block area to raise money for the child's upbringing. He had frequent face-to-face confrontations with Gov. Clinton over child support. Clinton privately referred to MacIntosh with aides using the &amp;quot;n&amp;quot; word.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emptysuit.wordpress.com&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The story resurfaced during the 2008 primaries, only this time the denials weren't so strong and adopted a more forgiving attitude.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2008/01/17/sex-lies-and-major-headlines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epubbookonline.com/b/3035/roger-stone/the-clintons-war-on-women/27&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many blacks and Obama supporters were put off by the mainstresm media spin and questioned the untimely death of Ron Brown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wc.blackplanet.com/news/article_comments.html?news_item_id=46467&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://aapoliticalpundit.blogspot.com/2007/12/blacks-clintons-presidency-and-ron.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even the ''Washington Post'' noticed the racial undercurrent in Hillary Clinton's campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/22/AR2007122201762.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ron Brown ===&lt;br /&gt;
The death of Ron Brown remains a controversial subject among African-Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/BMXnPYGDgVc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ron Brown was the first black [[Secretary of Commerce]] who died in the crash of Air Force Two. The crash occurred one week before Brown was slated to give testimony in the Clinton campaign finance scandal, among other scandals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/HR-WkSEzaho&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Confederate Flag Day ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Arkansas Legislature's Act 116 of 1987 designated the star above the word &amp;quot;Arkansas&amp;quot; on the state flag as a commemoration of the Confederacy, signed into law by Gov. Clinton, as well as annual proclamations for Confederate Flag Day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 1985 Clinton signed Act 985 into law, making the birthdates of Martin Luther King Jr. and [[Robert E. Lee]], General of the Confederate army, state holidays on the same day. The coded message sent to white constituents could not have be clearer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Black lives don't matter ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Blmhillary (1).jpg|right|350px|thumb|Democrat Presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton confronted by Black Lives Matter protesters in 2016.]]&lt;br /&gt;
On the eve of the [[New Hampshire]] primary in 1992, Bill Clinton took off from the campaign trail to sign the death warrant and oversee the execution of a retarded black man, Ricky Ray Rector. Recktor, who had been lobotomized, was mentally incompetent and unable to understand the charges against him.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://skepticalbrotha.wordpress.com/tag/christopher-hitchens/ Christopher Hitchens], Skeptical Brotha. Retrieved 23 June 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blackstarnews.com/us-politics/elections/bill-clinton-hopped-up-on-whack-ricky-ray-rector-part-2.html Bill Clinton &amp;quot;Hopped Up On Whack&amp;quot; -- Ricky Ray Rector Part 2], Colin Benjamin, Black Star News, April 13, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;It was like executing a child,&amp;quot; the prison chaplain said. Hillary, the master strategist of the Clintons' rise, fearing the Willie Horton syndrome which torpedoed [[Michael Dukakis]] in 1988 and the 'monkey business' which destroyed [[Gary Hart]] as well, still defended the execution in 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://theintercept.com/2016/03/17/hillary-clintons-indefensible-stance-on-the-death-penalty/ Hillary Clinton's Indefensible Stance on the Death Penalty], Liliana Segura, ''The Intercept'', Mar. 17 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.salon.com/2016/01/31/the_clintons_sordid_race_game_no_one_will_say_it_but_the_clintons_rise_was_premised_on_repudiating_black_voters/ Jan 31, 2016 04:00 AM MDT The Clintons' sordid race game: No one will say it, but the Clintons' rise was premised on repudiating black voters], Corey Robin, ''Salon'', Jan. 31, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary was at his side when Bill Clinton raised mandatory sentencing guidelines which disproportionately sent Blacks to prison, giving the United States the highest mass incarceration rate in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://newrepublic.com/article/129433/clintons-war-drugs-black-lives-didnt-matter The Clintons' War on Drugs: When Black Lives Didn't Matter], By Donna Murch, ''The New Republic'', February 9, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Clinton's championed the &amp;quot;three strikes you're out&amp;quot; law, passed a crime bill that created dozens of new federal capital crimes, mandated life sentences for some three-time offenders, and authorized more than $16 billion for more state prisons. By the time the Clintons left office in 2001, the United States had the highest rate of incarceration in the world. [[Human Rights Watch]] reported that in seven states, African Americans constituted 80 to 90 percent of all drug offenders even though they were no more likely than whites to use or sell illegal drugs. Prison admissions for drug offenses reached a level in 2000 for African Americans more than 26 times the level they had been under [[Ronald Reagan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thenation.com/article/hillary-clinton-does-not-deserve-black-peoples-votes/ Why Hillary Clinton Doesn't Deserve the Black Vote], Michelle Alexander, ''The Nation'', February 10, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2015, while several American cities smoldered in riots over police shootings, Hillary Clinton had several prison industry lobbyists working as fundraisers on her campaign. The fundraiser-lobbyists worked for the Corrections Corporation of America and Geo Group, which also run most of the [[immigrant]] detention centers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/while-missouri-students-battle-racism-prison-lobbyists-funded-hillary-clintons-campaign_b_8553370.html While Missouri Students Battle Racism, Prison Lobbyists Funded Hillary Clinton's Campaign], H.A. Goodman, ''Huffington Post'', Nov 13, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Racial profiling Hispanics ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Clintons instituted [[racial profiling]] of [[Latino]]s as drug dealers in 1988. Specifically, the troopers were authorized to stop and search cars driven by Hispanics, especially those with Texas license plates. Again, the Clintons' Criminal Apprehension Program was challenged in federal court and ruled unconstitutional. But the program went on anyway with further destruction of civil liberties when the Clintons authorized state troopers to stop and search any car regardless of race.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-56765970.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roberto Garcia de Posada, executive director of the Hispanic Business Roundtable, cited the fact that Clinton was &amp;quot;a strong supporter of racial profiling against Hispanics,&amp;quot; and thst they do not have &amp;quot;the moral authority to lead a national campaign on this issue.&amp;quot; The Clintons need to &amp;quot;apologize to all those Hispanics who suffered this 'morally indefensible' practice&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Naked racism ===&lt;br /&gt;
A Black Lives Matter activist confront Hillary Clinton in 2016 about the Clintons' history of [[racism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fair.org/home/why-did-it-take-an-activist-to-bring-superpredators-into-the-campaign/ Why Did It Take an Activist to Bring 'Superpredators' Into the Campaign?], By Jim Naureckas, FAIR, 27 Feb 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In January 2016 ''[[Salon]]'' published an article on the dirty little secret among the liberal intelligentsia no one wants to talk about: the Clintons' rise and success has been based on stoking racial fears. Stan Greenberg conducted the focus groups that dictated the Clintons' daily buzzwords and talking points to provide the fodder and fuel the Clintons lived and died on. Greenberg's work produced results claiming the Democratic party was too identified with [[Jesse Jackson]] and minorities to speak for 'average Americans' and it needed to appeal to white working class swing voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://prospect.org/article/crisis-working-majority-0 From Crisis to Working Majority], Stan Greenberg, ''The American Prospect'' 2, no. 7 (September 1991). Republished 24 May 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps nothing reveals the cold, cruel, calculated and hateful divisiveness in the heart of the woman than her comment to Sam Donaldson on ABC's ''Prime Time Live'' that Gennifer Flowers was the daughter of Willie Horton. Intended as a throwaway line, with all the facts in now&amp;amp;nbsp;— that it was a lie and she knew it was a lie&amp;amp;nbsp;— we see the cynical manipulation of people, particularly those in the civil rights and women's movements, and her incipient predations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=1j6Xy5FnBzkC&amp;amp;pg=PA268&amp;amp;lpg=PA268&amp;amp;dq=gennifer+flowers+is+the+daughter+of+willie+horton&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=LIylbGcmHA&amp;amp;sig=35GnRjdcZx32qV_stExpcJV0PFw&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwjPgdST5s3NAhUIKGMKHfDfCOgQ6AEIODAE#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=gennifer%20flowers%20is%20the%20daughter%20of%20willie%20horton&amp;amp;f=false The Rhetoric of First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton: Crisis Management Discourse], Colleen E. Kelley, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001, pp. 268-269&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1992 for the first time in nearly half a century the party platform made no mention of redressing racial injustice. Through triangulation and a policy of 'get tuff on crime', the Clintons sought to repudiate and distance themselves from the Democratic party's commitment to the struggles of [[African-American]]s. The Clinton's formulated a crime bill purportedly to &amp;quot;put 100,000 new cops on the street&amp;quot;. Hillary became one of the chief spokespersons referring to black teens as dogs.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called 'super-predators.' No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why they ended up that way but first we have to bring them to heel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-sanders-slams-clintons-racist-1996-super-predators-comment/ Bernie Sanders slams Clinton's &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; 1996 super predators comment], By Reena Flores, CBS News, April 14, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fair.org/extra/superscapegoating/ Superscapegoating], Teen 'superpredators' hype set stage for draconian legislation, By Robin Templeton, FAIR, 1 Jan 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
In the 2008 presidential primaries, the Clintons were back at it: fostering racial fear and paranoia,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alternet.org/story/80258/america's_new_racial_reality%3A_white_minority_status America's New Racial Reality: White Minority Status], While Obama raises the bar for racial understanding, the Democratic Leadership Council leverages white voter fear. By Roberto Lovato / New America Media, March 21, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which by now seemed to be the regular program of the Democratic Leadership Council.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blackcommentator.com/46/46_cover.html Muzzling The African-American Agenda With Black Help], Bruce A. Dixon, ''The Black Commentator''. www.blackcommentator.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They tried to marginalize Obama as the black candidate with comparisons to Jesse Jackson&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/26/bill-clinton-obama-is-jus_n_83406.html Bill Clinton: Obama Is Just Like Jesse Jackson], ''Huffington Post'', 03/28/2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; emphasizing Hillary's 'wide appeal': &amp;quot;Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again&amp;quot;, Hillary told ''USA Today''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-07-clintoninterview_N.htm Clinton makes case for wide appeal], By Kathy Kiely and Jill Lawrence, USA TODAY, 5/8/2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She mocked and ridiculed Obama's fitness to lead on his no first strike nuclear pledge saying, &amp;quot;I don't believe that any president should make any blanket statements with respect to the use or nonuse of nuclear weapons,&amp;quot; whereas two months earlier she promised to nuke Iran. She stayed in the race even after it became apparent she lost, according to her, only because Obama might be assassinated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As heir to the [[New Deal]] tradition and key to the New England donor base, Sen. [[Ted Kennedy]]'s blessing on the candidate for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination was vital. The Clinton's also were seeking bona fides among liberals and the [[civil rights]] movement. Clinton said of Obama, &amp;quot;that boy would have been carrying our bags and getting us coffee a few years ago&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://urbanintellectuals.com/2015/07/17/did-you-know-bill-clinton-made-racist-comments-about-barack-obama-when-he-first-ran-for-president/ Did You Know Bill Clinton Made Racist Comments About Barack Obama When He First Ran For President], F. Taylor, Urban Intellectuals, July 17, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kennedy was offended by Clinton's racism and refused to give Hillary the endorsement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/apr/28/hillaryclinton.usa Hillary has cynically turned to the one argument she has left: race], Gary Younge, ''Guardian'' UK, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alternet.org/story/80258/america's_new_racial_reality%3A_white_minority_status America's New Racial Reality: White Minority Status], While Obama raises the bar for racial understanding, the Democratic Leadership Council leverages white voter fear. By Roberto Lovato / New America Media, March 21, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Haitian abductions ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See: [[Pizzagate]]''&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010, Bill Clinton, through the Clinton Foundation, worked for the release of 10 adults who had been arrested transporting 33 [[Haiti]]an children abducted from their families across the border to the [[Dominican Republic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/vzVAcn1YkcY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== African sex slaves ===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, this advocate of women and children's rights was asked repeatedly in 2011 to designate [[Boko Haram]] as a terrorist organization after the group bombed the [[United Nations]] headquarters in Abuja. Secretary Clinton's State Department refused, despite requests coming from the U.S. Justice Department, the FBI, the [[CIA]], and numerous Senators and Congressmen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-dropped-ball-boko-haram-020300046--politics.html?ref=gs Hillary Dropped the Ball on Boko Haram], Josh Rogin, [The Daily Beast], May 7, 2014. www.yahoo.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In May 2012, Justice Department official Lisa Monaco wrote to the State Department to urge Clinton to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist organization. The following month, Gen. Carter Ham, the chief of U.S. Africa Command, said that Boko Haram provided a 'safe haven' for al Qaeda in the Maghreb (al Qaeda in North Africa) and was likely sharing explosives and funds with the group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Morrissey, Ed (May 8, 2014). [https://hotair.com/archives/2014/05/08/did-hillary-refuse-to-designate-boko-haram-as-a-terrorist-organization/ Did Hillary refuse to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist organization?] Hot Air website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American counterterrorism agencies were asking for the legal authority to begin countering Boko Haram. Boko Haram is now an Islamic State province but at the time it held allegiance to al Qaeda. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, at the behest of French and British [[corporate]] interests was in negotiation with several al Qaeda affiliates&amp;amp;nbsp;— [[al Qaeda in the Maghreb]], the [[Libyan Islamic Fighting Group]], and Ansar al Shariah&amp;amp;nbsp;— to destabilize Muammar Gaddafi in Libya at the time and didn't want to antagonize or alienate her allies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2014 Boko Haram kidnapped 276 teenage schoolgirls, most of whom were Black, and announced its intention to sell them as [[marital]] [[sex]] [[slave]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theledger.com/opinion/20160927/letter-for-hillary-money-matters-more&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Birth of the birther movement ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See [[Obama birth certificate lawsuits]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign team began spreading [[Islamophobic]] rumors that Obama was a Muslim schooled in a ''madrassa'' as a child in Indonesia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/05/bill-clinton-barack-obama-bromance-long-slow-making Bill Clinton and Barack Obama: an alliance long and slow in the making], Gary Younge, ''Guardian'' UK.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20080506093354/http://www.stop-obama.org/?page_id=23 Who is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA?] Mission Statement, stop-obama.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Clinton advisor Sidney Blumenthal, working through his son, Max Blumenthal, was the origin of the rumors that Barack Hussein Obama was a Muslim in order to stir up fear among the electorate which was intended to discredit Obama and work to Hillary's benefit.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-great-islamophobic-crusade/ The Great Islamophobic Crusade], CBSNEWS, December 19, 2010. cbsnews.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It began with People United Means Action (PUMA), a group of Hillary Clinton supporters who not only opposed Barack Obama's nomination, but then went on to oppose his Presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/bifsEkjTAc8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; PUMA members pointed to charges that the media directed sexism and misogyny at Clinton during the primary campaign and expressed anger at Democratic Party leaders' failure to speak out against that or otherwise respond appropriately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political Correctness summit gaffe ===&lt;br /&gt;
During a political correctness summit, where she acted as a keynote speaker, she let her views on blacks out publicly where she stated that &amp;quot;all [blacks] look alike [to her].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.teaparty.org/hillary-clinton-says-blacks-look-alike-political-correctness-summit-330890/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U.S. Senate ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article [[Hillary Clinton Senate career]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FALN ===&lt;br /&gt;
In preparation for her Senate bid, Bill Clinton offered clemency to members of the [[Armed Forces of National Liberation]] (FALN) [[terrorist]] group&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20080501015940/http://rpc.senate.gov/_files/92199CoddlingTerrorists.pdf &amp;quot;Coddling terrorists?&amp;quot;] (September 21, 1999). Senate Republican Policy Committee. Retrieved from May 1, 2008 archive at Internet Archive.&lt;br /&gt;
*U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary (September 15, 1999). [https://web.archive.org/web/20000416225221/https://www.senate.gov/~judiciary/wl91599.htm &amp;quot;Witness list (and transcribed statements): Hearing before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 'Clemency for FALN Members'&amp;quot;]. U.S. Senate website/Committee on the Judiciary. Retrieved from April 16, 2000 archive at Internet Archive.&lt;br /&gt;
*U.S. Senate, 106th Congress (September 14, 1999). [https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/33 &amp;quot;S.J. Res. 106-33: A joint resolution deploring the actions of President Clinton regarding granting clemency to FALN terrorists.&amp;quot;] U.S. Congress website/Legislation/106th Congress/Senate joint resolutions. Passed 95-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to curry favor with [[radical]] [[Puerto Rican]] voters among the New York electorate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.jonathanpollard.org/senate.htm &amp;quot;FALN clemency and NY Senate race&amp;quot;] (1999-2009). Justice for Jonathan Pollard website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The FALN bombed the historic Fraunces Tavern in [[Manhattan]], killing four people in 1975. Over a six-year period, the group claimed responsibility for more than 100 bombings that took six lives and injured some 130 people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/puertorico/sep4.htm &amp;quot;Clinton pardons terror&amp;quot;] (August 13, 1999). ''New York Post''. Reprinted at Latin American Studies website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Illegal fundraising, 2000 ===&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2006 Hillary Clinton's New York Senate 2000 campaign was fined by the FEC for failing to accurately report $721,895 in contributions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.fec.gov/press/press2006/20060126mur.html &amp;quot;Press release, Matter under review 5225&amp;quot;] (January 26, 2006). Federal Election Commission website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Illegal fundraising, 2007 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Norman Hsu was a 'HillRaiser', someone who brought in more than $860,000 for her 2008 presidential campaign, and co-hosted a $1 million fundraiser in Beverly Hills. Hsu had been convicted of defrauding investors of over $1 million in 1992 and had a fugitive warrant out for over 15 years at the time. Hillary had been warned about the source of the contributions earlier, but only returned the money after the scandal became public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Secretary of State ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article [[Hillary Clinton Secretary of State]]&lt;br /&gt;
As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was empowered to approve or reject commercial arms sales to foreign governments based upon a broad range of reasons, from [[national security]] considerations to [[human rights]] concerns. This often brought her into a [[legal]] and [[ethical]] [[conflict of interest]] with donors to the [[Clinton Foundation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sen. [[Elizabeth Warren]] has also criticized the foreign corporations that donate cash to the Clinton Foundation, citing &amp;quot;a French company&amp;quot;, the Veolia Group, &amp;quot;that sued Egypt after Egypt raised its minimum wage.&amp;quot; Veolia contributed between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Warren criticized Philip Morris, part of the Altria group, another Clinton Foundation donor. And &amp;quot;a Swedish company&amp;quot;, Vattenfall, a state-owned Swedish utility; the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency has contributed between $1 million and $10 million.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://freebeacon.com/politics/elizabeth-warren-targets-clinton-foundation-donors/ Elizabeth Warren Targets Clinton Foundation Donors], Brent Scher, May 8, 2015. freebeacon.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She was a staunch advocate of American boots on the ground in [[Syria]] and [[Libya]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2016/06/17/the-war-risk-of-hillary-clinton/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She has promised, if elected President, greater intervention,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/time-delay-over-hillary-clinton-outlines-plan-combat-isis-n466346&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the use of nuclear weapons against [[Iran]] if Iran were to launch a nuclear attack against [[Israel]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/857guwaNbRc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton later admitted to having emailed over 100 government officials, including President Obama, through her personal email account.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klein, Aaron (September 13, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/13/hillary-clinton-admits-emailed-100-government-employees-private-server/ Hillary Clinton Admits She Emailed Over 100 Government Employees from Private Server]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 14, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Hillary Clinton Doctrine of smart power ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obama war crimes}}&lt;br /&gt;
After being rejected for the top leadership of her party in 2008, the 62-year-old Clinton tenaciously held onto a quest for power, releasing her convention delegates and being granted the position of Secretary of State. Neither Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, or George W. Bush were particularly qualified in the area of foreign affairs, but in the Democratic party a resume that includes reforming Arkansas public schools, receiving an appointment based on [[nepotism]] to squander tens of millions of dollars for a federal healthcare study program that never took shape, or serving as a non-distinct Senator with no tangible accomplishments qualifies a person to hold a high level position in a time of international crisis that neither they, nor their boss, understand anything about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'Don't do stupid stuff' was President Obama's instructions to Hillary, the mantra being that George W. Bush was 'stupid', and therefore anything that departed from the policies of G.W. Bush was 'smart'. From this evolved Hillary's doctrine of 'smart power', overthrowing regimes with weapons supplied by donors to the Clinton Foundation without putting U.S. boots on the ground and unleashing millions of refugees worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this 'smart power' needed a formal name; in recent decades several President's had 'doctrines' named after themselves&amp;amp;nbsp;— the Nixon Doctrine, the Carter Doctrine, the Bush Doctrine; Bill Clinton was cheated, he never had any interest in foreign policy and little impact, so now it was time for a 'Clinton Doctrine', that is, the 'Hillary Clinton Doctrine' formulated by a Secretary of State that she could ride into the White House with. Thus began the quest to overthrow a U.S. ally as a favor to foreign donors to the Clintons. President Obama woke up too late to see how he had been used and manipulated to bring about a massive humanitarian crisis, and the damage Hillary Clinton's machinations have done to his presidency and legacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all, the team of President Obama and Secretary Clinton has been a disaster for the world. Teaming up support for the 2016 Presidential election as loyal Democrats is a farce; they already are blaming each other for the hundreds of thousands dead, and the 2,000,000 refugees who have flooded across Europe just since 2014. And they most assuredly will continue to blame each other in their memoirs. A [[skeptic]] may say it doesn't matter, Middle Easterners don't vote in U.S. elections; but a skeptic might also have no problem voting for a leader with no [[conscience]]. The world is now in the midst of a serious displaced persons refugee crisis, the most serious since the end of [[World War II]] in 1945.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Catastrophic aftermath ====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mass beheading of Christians in Libya.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Hillary's War culminated in the creation of the [[Islamic State]] and mass beheading of [[Christian]]s.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear armed dictators such as [[Kim Jong-un]] witnessed how Gaddafi had been lied to and double-crossed by Secretary Clinton and her consortium.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;theatlantic.com&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Decades of negotiation were lost with him, his father, and his grandfather, to persuade [[North Korea]] to give up its WMD, nukes and [[ballistic missile]] programs, return to the community of 'civilized nations', and to live in peace and harmony by accepting the word of the United States chief negotiator, the Secretary of State. When North Korea illegally tested an above-ground nuclear device in January 2016 it specifically cited the fate of Gaddafi as to why it needs a nuclear deterrent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;telegraph.co.uk&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The brave new world Hillary built in Libya soon descended into chaos. The irascible [[jihad]]i elements Hillary and Obama supported turned their U.S. supplied weapons on American territory, the Embassy at Benghazi. Hillary's 'moderate rebels' -- [[al-Qaeda in the Maghreb]] and the [[Libyan Islamic Fighting Group]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/21/benghazi-raid-libyan-revolution Benghazi raid leaves cradle of Libyan revolution fearing for its future] ''[[The Guardian]]'' September 21, 2012. &amp;quot;There was no demonstration. They came with machine guns, with rockets.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;—killed the American Ambassador reportedly in the same fashion Gaddafi had been murdered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aina.org/news/20120913165253.htm Ambassador Stevens Was Raped Before His Murder, Reports Claim], 2012-09-13. www.aina.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; All this was occurring on American soil only 56 days prior to the [[Presidential Election 2012|2012 Presidential election]] where the slogan was &amp;quot;[[Osama Bin Laden#Abbottabad raid|Bin Laden is dead]], [[Crony capitalism|GM is alive]], and al Qaeda is on the run.&amp;quot; The deceptive narrative denying America had been attacked was issued by Hillary Clinton at nearly the precise time Ambassador [[Christopher Stevens]] was viciously murdered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUObFqU5cgE Here's the KEY MOMENT in Benghazi hearings&amp;amp;nbsp;— Rep. Jordan nails Hillary on LIES], posted by [[Pamela Geller]], Oct 22, 2015. youtube.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Libyan fiasco stiffened the resolve of [[Vladimir Putin]]. Putin did not veto the U.N. Security Council which passed a 'fig leaf' resolution to give its proponents, Hillary Clinton, [[Nicolas Sarkozy#Libyan affair|Nicolas Sarkozy]], [[David Cameron]] and Barack Obama an air of legitimacy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/forgotten-war-understanding-incredible-debacle-left-behind-nato-libya.html Understanding The Incredible Debacle Left Behind By NATO In Libya], Posted on February 28, 2015 by WashingtonsBlog.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III], by Maidhc Ó Cathail – Diana Johnstone, March 10, 2016. www.counterpunch.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Amidst the ensuing chaos they began blaming each other. Once the duplicity and betrayal of the U.S. State Department under Hillary Clinton became obvious, Putin moved to shore up defense of his own allies&amp;amp;nbsp;— Russians residing in the [[Ukraine]] and [[Crimea]], and [[Syria]]n President [[Bashar al-Assad]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603 Address by President of the Russian Federation], March 18, 2014. en.kremlin.ru&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Putin felt betrayed, the U.N. Security Council resolution was only to provide a no-fly zone aircover for the rebels, not an authorization for direct attacks and intervention against Gaddafi's forces as Putin had been assured beforehand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Iranian nuke deal ===&lt;br /&gt;
The ''EU Times'' reported on 30 December 2012 Hillary Clinton had been injured in the crash landing of a C-12 Huron military aircraft 3 weeks prior in the city of Ahvaz,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eutimes.net/2012/12/clinton-injured-us-navy-seal-killed-in-secret-us-mission-to-iran/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Iran while on a secret mission in preparation of the Iranian nuclear deal and lifting sanctions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americannewsservice.org/search/label/Commander%20Job%20W.%20Price&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The report was ciculated among Hillary's staffers who joking referred to it as a conspiracy theory until Les Horn responded to Anthony Milavic on 3 January 2013,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Anthony -- FYI. The report appears to be credible. Les&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/9457&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Reports say upon landing the plane encountered &amp;quot;extreme turbulence&amp;quot; causing it to leave the runway where its main landing gear then collapsed. Within seconds Iranian emergency and security personal responded freeing the victims, including Secretary Clinton who was reportedly unconscious and &amp;quot;bleeding profusely.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''EU Times'' noted, &amp;quot;US media reports state that Secretary Clinton will return to work next week after her having suffered what they describe as a &amp;quot;nasty bout with stomach flu&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;concussion&amp;quot; which have kept her missing from public view the past three weeks. The ''Debkafile'' confirmed these reports.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20130101003102/http://debka.com/article/22645/Hillary-Clinton-in-hospital-amid-speculation-of-plane-accident-in-Iran&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Boko Haram ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nigerian girls.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Hillary Clinton did nothing to protect the lives and safety of 276 Christian girls kidnapped by [[Boko Haram]] and sold as sex slaves, despite multiple agency requests. The Obama administration furnished the same organization SAM-7 missiles capable of shooting down commercial and military aircraft.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/libyan-missiles-on-the-loose/2012/05/08/gIQA1FCUBU_story.html?utm_term=.a091217ed1fd Libyan missiles on the loose], By [[David Ignatius]], Washington Post Opinion writer, May 8, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton refused to place [[Boko Haram]] on the State Department's list of foreign terrorist organizations in 2011, after the group bombed the UN headquarters in Abuja. The refusal came despite the urging of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and over a dozen Senators and Congressmen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Morrissey, Ed (May 8, 2014). [https://hotair.com/archives/2014/05/08/did-hillary-refuse-to-designate-boko-haram-as-a-terrorist-organization/ &amp;quot;Did Hillary refuse to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist organization?&amp;quot;] Hot Air website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Placing Boko Haram on the State Department's terrorist list would then give legal authority to the CIA or FBI to act. At the time, Hillary was deeply involved in negotiations with and efforts to arm various Al Qaeda entities to overthrow Gaddafi and Assad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boko Haram, a terrorist group numbering 15,000 in three countries of West Africa, has murdered at least 20,000 people and displaced another 2.6 million. Boko Haram in 2011 was affiliated with [[Al Qaeda in the Maghreb]]; by 2017 it had the Islamic States' largest number of members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014 Boko Haram kidnapped 276 Black African Christian girls and has sold them into slavery, reports indicate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Saudi Arabia and the Clinton Foundation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Once Saddam Hussein fell in April 2003, the [[Bush administration]] hastily closed Prince Sultan Airbase ending a long-term commitment to the defense of Saudi Arabia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/prince-sultan.htm Prince Sultan Air Base, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia]. globalsecurity.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the end of the decade the Clinton Foundation received millions from an organization known as the Friends of Saudi Arabia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/18/clinton.donations Clinton's foundation got millions from Saudis, Gates], CNN, December 18, 2008. Univision TV owner also gave millions.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With the theft of government records, and the admission Hillary scrubbed the server, the exact extent of a conflict of interest and other violations of law at present is unclear.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://insider.foxnews.com/2015/03/30/gowdy-hillary-clinton-wiped-her-server-between-october-and-december-2014 Gowdy: Hillary Clinton Wiped Server Between October &amp;amp; December 2014], On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, ''[[FOX News]]'', 30 March 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-clinton-email-scandal-20160327-story.html How Hillary Clinton's email scandal took root], Robert O'Harrow Jr., ''Washington Post'', 27 March 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Rape victims ====&lt;br /&gt;
As Secretary of State, the Clinton Foundation accepted donations from the Kingdom of [[Saudi Arabia]], where rape victims are regularly flogged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/09/us/politics/hillary-clinton-faces-test-of-record-aiding-women.html?_r=1 Hillary Clinton Faces Test of Record as Women's Advocate], By AMY CHOZICK, ''New York Times'', MARCH 8, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mrctv.org/blog/rand-paul-stone-age-barbaric-saudi-arabia-buying-influence-donating-hillary-clinton Rand Paul: 'Hillary Clinton Shouldn't Have Taken That Money' from Saudi Arabia], Barbara Boland | March 25, 2015. www.mrctv.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.gop.com/clinton-foundation-takes-from-countries-that-mistreat-women/ Clinton Foundation Takes $$ From Countries That Mistreat Women], October 11, 2015. www.gop.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/clintons-outrage-at-saudi-rape-sentence/2007/11/22/1195321896405.html Clinton's 'outrage' at Saudi rape sentence], ''Sydney Morning Herald'', November 22, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Conservative group claims Hillary Clinton's foundation took millions from foreign governments, [https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/feb/26/american-crossroads/conservative-group-claims-hillary-clintons-foundat/ Politifact: Statement:'''TRUE'''], By Steve Contorno, February 26th, 2015. politifact.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2015, a 19-year-old woman who was the victim of a violent gang rape was sentenced to 200 lashes and six months in jail after found guilty of being &amp;quot;indecent&amp;quot; at the time of the attack. Saudi law dictates a woman must have a male escort in public. She originally was sentenced to 90 lashes; on appeal the sentence was more than doubled to 200 lashes and six months in jail after found guilty of indecency and exposing the case in the media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Gay rights ====&lt;br /&gt;
While [[homosexuality]] is punishable by [[death]] under certain circumstances, this particular active Clinton donor at the present time is seeking to increase the frequency at which [[execution]]s of [[gay]]s is carried out. The Saudi judicial system blames [[Social media]] for causing an increase in 'deliberate' acts of homosexuality. As of the first half of 2016, there were 35 people on death row in Saudi Arabia for sodomy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/saudi-arabia-pushes-homosexuals-executed-7672283 Saudi Arabia 'pushes for homosexuals to be executed' amid fears social media is 'turning people gay'], By Rhian Lubin, ''Mirror'', 1 April 2016. www.mirror.co.uk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Arms sales ====&lt;br /&gt;
As Sec. Clinton approved weapons transfers, both Saudi Arabia [[Boeing]] aircraft made donations to the Clinton Foundation. The ''[[The Washington Post]]'' revealed that a Boeing [[lobbyist]] was also working as a fundraiser in the early stages of Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/for-hillary-clinton-and-boeing-a-beneficial-relationship/2014/04/13/21fe84ec-bc09-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html For Hillary Clinton and Boeing, a beneficial relationship], By Rosalind S. Helderman, ''Washington Post'', April 13, 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Boeing F15 fighters'''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Early in her tenure the $29.4 Billion sale and upgrades of Boeing F15 fighter aircraft was a 'top priority'. The Saudi air campaign in [[Yemen]] has been led by American-made F-15 fighter jets. According to the United Nations at least 2,800 civilians have been killed in airstrikes so far.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=52938#.V2iKGKLT9aU Yemen: civilian casualties top 8,100 as airstrikes and shelling continue, UN reports], 5 January 2016. un.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Three facilities supported by Doctors Without Borders have been bombed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Cluster bombs'''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The U.N. Secretary General has decried &amp;quot;intense airstrikes in residential areas and on civilian buildings in Sanaa, including the chamber of commerce, a wedding hall, and a center for the blind,&amp;quot; and has warned that reports of cluster bombs being used in populated areas &amp;quot;may amount to a [[war crime]] due to their indiscriminate nature.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://theintercept.com/2016/02/22/saudi-christmas-present/ Emails Show Hillary Clinton Aides Celebrating F-15 Sales to Saudi Arabia: &amp;quot;Good News&amp;quot;], Lee Fang, ''The Intercept'', Feb. 22 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Human Rights Watch]] released a report providing new indications that Saudi Arabia has fired American-made cluster munitions, banned by international treaty, in civilian areas of Yemen. [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/15/world/middleeast/new-report-of-us-made-cluster-bomb-use-by-saudis-in-yemen.html?_r=0 New Report of U.S.-Made Cluster Bomb Use by Saudis in Yemen], By RICK GLADSTONEFEB, ''New York Times'', February 14, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== European migrant crisis ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IMG 20170511 212807.jpg|right|300px|thumb|The European refugee crisis, the result of what the Washington Post calls ''Hillary's War's''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/hillarys-war-how-conviction-replaced-skepticism-in-libya-intervention/2011/10/28/gIQAhGS7WM_story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;— has permanently transformed European society.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article:'' [[European migrant crisis]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Libyan uprising|Libyan Civil War]] and [[Syrian War]], the legacies of President [[Barack Hussein Obama]] and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's failed &amp;quot;[[Arab Spring]]&amp;quot; [[foreign policy]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/10/middle-east-egypt-us-policy/409537/ Islamism, the Arab Spring, and the Failure of America's Do-Nothing Policy in the Middle East], SHADI HAMID, ''The Atlantic'', OCT 9, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;— which according to their own public pronouncements was supposed to overthrow corrupt [[secular]] dictators and establish [[democracies]] by arming and assisting anti-democratic [[Islamist]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110523-obama-and-arab-kspring Obama and the Arab Spring], George Friedman, ''Stratfor'', MAY 24, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;— resulted in attacks on gays and women, mass beheadings, wholesale slaughter,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.jihadwatcheurope.org/daesh-slaughters-200-syrian-children-in-a-savage-mass-execution/ Daesh mass execution of 200 Syrian children, 2014]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and a tsunami in excess of 6 million homeless migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and jihadis invading Europe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.unrefugees.org/2015/06/a-world-at-war/ Global Trends Forced Displacement in 2015], UNHCR, June 18, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One major factor in [[Brexit]] is the [[European refugee crisis]], causing [[Britain]] to tighten its borders. Over 2 million Muslims settled in Germany&amp;amp;nbsp;— 4 times larger than Germany's standing military, in 2015 as a result of Hillary's call for &amp;quot;Assad must go.&amp;quot; Nearly one million natural born citizens of their homeland left Germany at the same time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2016/07/16/over-2-million-muslims-migrated-to-germany-in-2015/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== NXIVM sex cult ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton collected tens of thousands of dollars from at least a dozen members of the NXIVM sex cult. It's co-founder, Nancy Salzman, plead guilty to sex slavery charges in March 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courthousenews.com/co-founder-of-group-tied-to-sex-slavery-pleads-guilty/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Seagram's heiress [[Clare Bronfman]] hacked into Hillary Clinton's emails so cult bosses could read Clinton's emails.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Records-NXIVM-hacked-billionaire-s-emails-with-6576310.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both Salzman and Bronfman are members of the exclusive millionaire donor's club, the [[Clinton Global Initiative]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2007/10/01/hillarys-30000-fans-are-her-cult-following/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; NXIVM founder Keith Raniere was charged with manufacturing child pornography in March 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-crime-cult/self-help-guru-raniere-faces-u-s-child-porn-charges-associate-pleads-guilty-idUSKCN1QU2Z2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The NXIVM sex cult were in possession of Hillary Clinton classified State Department emails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2016 Presidential election campaign ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hillary on the campaign trail.jpg|right|400px|thumb|Black faces were conspicuously absent from Clinton rallies; among other shocking revelations, the Pedosta emails flatly stated the Clinton machine &amp;quot;conspires to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/10/13/podesta-pal-we-conspire-to-produce-an-unaware-and-compliant-citizenry/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article: [[2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign]]''&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Presidential Election 2016|Clinton donors in the Panama Papers|Hillary Clinton email scandal|Fake news in the 2016 presidential election|FBI scandal|Spygate|Ukrainian collusion|Bill and Hillary Clinton and racism}}, ''[[United States presidential election, 2016#Clinton attacks on women|Clinton attacks on women]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton has held several public offices, and also ran for president in 2008 and 2016. In 2008 she lost to [[Barack Obama]], but she won the democratic nomination in a controversial and contested primary fight over [[populist]] [[Bernie Sanders]] during the [[2016 Presidential Election]]. Although Clinton won the popular vote 65,853,516 (46.1%) to 62,984,825 (48.2%), Trump won the [[electoral college]] vote, 306 to 232, with the incomplete vote count reported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/election/results|title=Election Results|access-date=Nov. 12, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Robert Epstein of the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology testified before Congress that [[Google]] bias and meddling had shifted &amp;quot;between 2.6 million and up to 10.4 million votes&amp;quot; to Hillary Clinton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/08/psychologist-google-generated-at-least-2-6-million-votes-for-hillary.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rigged nomination ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrat Iowa Caucus was very chaotic, poorly run, and whose results were very questionable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Samuelson, Darren (February 8, 2016). [https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/how-iowa-democrats-couldnt-handle-a-two-candidate-race-218934 Inside the Iowa caucus chaos]. ''Politico''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tuttle, Ian (February 5, 2016). [https://www.nationalreview.com/article/430878/hillary-clintons-iowa-victory-transparent-irregularities Iowa's Transparently Dishonest Democratic Caucus]. ''National Review''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jacobs, Jennifer (February 3, 2016). [http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2016/02/02/iowas-nightmare-revisited-correct-winner-called-caucus-night/79702010/ Iowa's nightmare revisited: Was correct winner called?] ''The Des Moines Register''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was reported that the results of 90 precincts, about 5 percent of the vote, went missing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://conservativetribune.com/iowa-caucus-democrat-party/ Iowa Democrat Party Issues Stunning Announcement About Caucus Results]. ''Conservative Tribune''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrat primary was rigged against Bernie Sanders and in favor of Hillary Clinton, and the party was shown to be helping Clinton behind the scenes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Griffin, Andrew (November 9, 2016). [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/bernie-sanders-us-election-president-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-democrats-primary-results-a7408451.html Donald Trump won election because Democrats rigged system to have Clinton beat Bernie Sanders, says WikiLeaks]. ''The Independent''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hoft, Jim (October 18, 2016). [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/obama-lectures-media-integrity-elections-forgets-democrats-just-rigged-primary-bernie/ Obama Lectures Trump on &amp;quot;Rigged&amp;quot; Elections&amp;amp;nbsp;— Forgets That Democrats Just Rigged Primary Against Bernie]. ''The Gateway Pundit''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, the Democrat primary has &amp;quot;superdelegates&amp;quot;, who are made up of party leaders and can vote for whomever they want regardless of what the primary voters want.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Resnikoff, Ned (May 16, 2016). [http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/why-will-superdelegates-decide-2016-democratic-primary-unearthed-documents-hold Why Will Superdelegates Decide The 2016 Democratic Primary? Unearthed Documents Hold The Key]. ''International Business Times''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even the leftist website [[Salon Media Group]] believed the primary was rigged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Demoro, Roseann (March 30, 2016). [https://www.salon.com/2016/03/30/10_ways_the_democratic_primary_has_been_rigged_from_the_start_partner/ 10 ways the Democratic primary has been rigged from the start]. ''Salon''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donna Brazile, the interim DNC Chair, shared Democrat primary town hall questions to the Clinton campaign in order to help her win the primary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shaw, Adam (March 17, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/17/brazile-admits-forwarded-debate-questions-to-clinton-camp.html Brazile admits she forwarded town hall questions to Clinton camp]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved March 17, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ernst, Douglas (March 17, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/17/donna-brazile-admits-leaking-debate-questions-to-c/ Donna Brazile admits leaking debate questions to Clinton camp: 'A mistake I will forever regret']. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved March 17, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She continued to deny this fact through February 2017&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scarry, Eddie (March 17, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/donna-brazile-finally-admits-she-shared-debate-questions-with-clinton-campaign/article/2617742 Donna Brazile finally admits she shared debate questions with Clinton campaign]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved March 17, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and blamed [[Russia]] for the ordeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hudson, Jerome (March 18, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/18/donna-brazile-admits-to-sharing-debate-questions-with-clinton-camp-blames-russia/ Donna Brazile Admits to Sharing Debate Questions With Clinton Camp, Blames Russia]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Wikileaks ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main articles:'' '''[[Murder of Seth Rich]]''' ''and'' '''[[Clinton body count]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton talking points emphasized the idea that US intelligence, the same people who brought you the [[WMD]] debacle, claim Russia and Putin are responsible for the hack of [[DNC]] servers which resulted in the firing of Democratic National Committee Chair [[Debbie Wasserman Schultz]]. This presumably would exonerate anyone connected with the DNC or Clinton campaign from complity in the Murder of Seth Rich.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sethrich-e1494948876256.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Seth Rich (1989-2016) was a Sanders' supporter who leaked DNC emails to WikiLeaks. His bullet ridden body was found on a dark Washington DC street two weeks before Hillary's nominating convention.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails provided by [[Wikileaks]] showed clear [[collusion]] between Clinton, [[mainstream media]] outlets, and the DNC to smear [[Bernie Sanders]]. Thousands of hopeful millennials felt betrayed by the Democratic party. DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz was forced out on the eve of the convention, less than 24 hours after dozens of emails were published by Wikileaks showing her and her staff rigging the primary elections for Hillary Clinton.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikileaks founder [[Julian Assange]] has offered $20,000 cash reward for the arrest and conviction of Seth Rich's killers or killer, the alleged [[Whistleblower Statutes|whistleblower]] who provided the DNC emails to Wikileaks and was murdered execution style in early July 2016. Hillary says of Assange in an email, &amp;quot;Can't we just drone this guy?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://truepundit.com/under-intense-pressure-to-silence-wikileaks-secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-proposed-drone-strike-on-julian-assange/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; To silence Assange, Wikileaks internet access was cut by the government of Ecuador after the release of Hillary's private paid speech to [[Goldman Sachs]]. Wikileaks Director, Prof. Gavin Macfayden, was found dead the following week. Macfayden's death was the third of a close associate of Assange in 6 months.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/790004642038050816/photo/1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Donna Brazile ===&lt;br /&gt;
After a live televised Commander-in-Chief discussion with [[NBC]]'s [[Matt Lauer]] where the questions were said to be agreed upon before hand, Lauer proceed to use the bulk of the time to press Hillary on questions of her controversial email server.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/kfGeXth-Do4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When the broadcast was over, Hillary was reported to have f!own into a rage demanding Lauer to be fired. Addressing interim DNC Chair [[Donna Brazile]], Hillary proclaimed,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|You stare at the wall like a brain dead buffalo, while letting ******* Lauer get away with this betrayal? Get the **** to work janitoring this mess- do I make myself clear?}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://victuruslibertas.com/2016/09/temper-temper-killary-goes-on-rampage-for-over-an-hour-throwing-glass-at-staffers-head/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Divisive and dismissive comments ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary branded half of Trump's supporters as &amp;quot;deplorables&amp;quot; and called them &amp;quot;irredeemable&amp;quot;. Her spokeswoman called Roman Catholics &amp;quot;severely backwards&amp;quot; and charging that they don't know &amp;quot;what the hell they're talking about.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wolfgang, Ben (October 12, 2016). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/12/catholic-group-calls-clinton-spokeswomans-resignat/ Catholic group calls for Clinton spokeswoman's resignation after anti-Catholic comments in emails]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Illegal fundraising 2016 ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Harvey-weinstein-Hillary-clinton-dinner-with-after-election-loss (2).jpg|right|200px|thumb|'''Hillary Clinton dines with Democrat mega donor Harvey Weinstein after the 2016 election, December 13, 2016.''' Weinstein, a charter founder of the Clinton Legal Defense Fund organized to defend President Clinton from sexual harassment and assault charges, has been accused of [[rape]] by 97 women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.businessinsider.com/list-of-women-who-have-accused-harvey-weinstein-of-sexual-harassment-or-assault-2017-10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Per election, an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party's main account. These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of those contribution limits&amp;amp;nbsp;— it's legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit for any one recipient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State parties however can make unlimited transfers to the national party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014 the [[Supreme Court]] made clear in ''McCutcheon v. FEC'', the Joint Finance Committee (JFC) may not solicit or accept contributions to circumvent base limits, through &amp;quot;earmarks&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;straw men&amp;quot; that are ultimately excessive&amp;amp;nbsp;— there are five separate prohibitions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Six-figure donations to the Clinton machine either never actually passed through state party accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting violations by the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF), state parties, and the DNC to other violations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donna Brazile and others admitted that the DNC placed the funds under the Clinton campaign's direct control, a massive breach of campaign finance law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democratic donors, knowing the funds would end up with Clinton's campaign, wrote six-figure checks to influence the election&amp;amp;nbsp;— 100 times larger than allowed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HVF bundled these megagifts and, on a single day, reported transferring money to all participating state parties, some of which would then show up on FEC reports filed by the DNC as transferring the exact same dollar amount on the exact same day to the DNC. Yet not all the state parties reported either receiving or transferring those sums.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/the-anatomy-of-hillary-clintons-84-million-money-laundering-scheme/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Results ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scream.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Many Clinton supporters likened Hillary's loss, and Donald Trump's victory, to Edward Munch's ''The Scream''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was widely expected that Clinton would win the election, and the elite pollsters and &amp;quot;political insiders&amp;quot; all predicted a massive Clinton victory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vogel, Kenneth P. &amp;amp; Isenstadt, Alex (November 9, 2016). [https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/how-did-everyone-get-2016-wrong-presidential-election-231036 How did everyone get it so wrong?]. ''Politico''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Catanese, David (October 24, 2016). [https://www.usnews.com/news/the-run-2016/articles/2016-10-24/republicans-last-hope-the-polls-are-wrong Republicans' Last Hope: The Polls Are Wrong]. ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At least once, when a poll was released that actually showed Trump leading, Clinton's campaign dismissed it as &amp;quot;bad polling&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nelson, Louis (November 1, 2016). [https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/clinton-campaign-bad-poll-abc-washington-post-230591 Clinton camp on new survey showing Trump ahead: It's 'bad polling']. ''Politico''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Instead, Trump won the election in a massive, historical upset, winning even states such as [[Pennsylvania]], [[Michigan]], and [[Wisconsin]], which a Republican had not won for 20–30 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/08/first-polls-close-in-2016-race-trump-projected-to-win-ind-ky-clinton-wins-vt.html Trump wins presidency, defeats Clinton in historic election upset]. ''Fox News''. November 8, 2016. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blake, Aaron (November 9, 2016). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/08/donald-trumps-path-to-victory-is-suddenly-looking-much-much-wider/ Donald Trump just blew up the electoral map]. ''The Washington Post''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The polling and predictions were off dramatically.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Flint, Joe &amp;amp; Alpert, Lukas I. (November 9, 2016). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/bad-polling-in-hand-media-misses-mark-badly-with-election-predictions-1478710860 How the Media's Election Predictions Badly Missed the Mark]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A version of ''[[Newsweek]]'' magazine was printed that reported a Clinton victory, saying &amp;quot;Madam President: Hillary Clinton's historic journey to the White House&amp;quot;, was published and distributed before the election results even came in.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greenslade, Roy (November 10, 2016). [https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2016/nov/10/if-only-donald-trump-had-come-second-eh-hillary Madam President: how Newsweek reported a Clinton victory]. ''The Guardian''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It appears that it is procedural and normal to make a copy for both candidates, but Clinton signed a copy of it prior to the election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taylor, Kristinn (November 9, 2016). [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/hubris-hillary-clinton-signed-newsweek-madam-president-cover-election-eve/ Hubris: Hillary Clinton Signed Newsweek 'Madam President' Cover On Election Eve]. ''The Gateway Pundit''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She later admitted that she did not draft a concession speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shepherd, Todd (September 10, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-concedes-i-had-not-drafted-a-concession-speech/article/2633949 Hillary Clinton concedes: 'I had not drafted a concession speech']. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 11, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the election, ''The American Spectator'' reported that on the night of the election, Clinton threw a massive extreme temper tantrum after she had realized she lost the election.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HRCMeltdown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. (November 14, 2016). [https://spectator.org/where-was-hillary/ Where Was Hillary?]. ''The American Spectator.'' Retrieved August 20, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Flynn, Daniel J. (November 15, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/15/hillary-clinton-screaming-obscenities-and-throwing-objects-in-election-night-meltdown/ Hillary Clinton Screaming Obscenities and Throwing Objects in Election Night Meltdown]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved November 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to a Secret Service agent, it was reported that &amp;quot;she began yelling, screaming obscenities, and pounding furniture. She picked up objects and threw them at attendants and staff. She was in an uncontrollable rage.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HRCMeltdown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, it was further reported that she became physical towards John Podesta and Robby Mook, needing to be restrained.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rusty (November 15, 2016). [http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-drunk-violent-meltdown-election-night/ Reports: Clinton Had a Violent Meltdown on Election Night]. ''The Political Insider''. Retrieved November 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This explains why she did not make a concession speech on election night, and why she delayed it the next morning multiple times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wrdw.com/content/news/Clinton-calls-Trump-to-congratulate-him-on-victory--400515131.html UPDATE | Clinton campaign pushes back address one hour]. ''WRDW'' (with ''AP''). November 9, 2016. Retrieved November 20, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Strause, Jackie (November 9, 2016). [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hillary-clinton-concession-speech-emotional-sorry-watch-945702 Hillary Clinton Delivers Emotional, Inspiring Concession Speech: &amp;quot;I'm Sorry&amp;quot;]. ''The Hollywood Reporter''. Retrieved November 20, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although Clinton had repeatedly claimed that Trump was too &amp;quot;temperamentally unfit&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Balakrishana, Anita (September 8, 2016). [https://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/08/hillary-clinton-press-conference.html Clinton: Trump is totally unqualified to be commander in chief]. ''CNBC''. Retrieved November 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or &amp;quot;irresponsible&amp;quot; to be president, this evidence, and others, shows otherwise.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RiddellHRCtemper&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Riddell, Kelly (May 23, 2016). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/23/hillary-clinton-hits-trump-temper-shes-no-picnic/ Hillary Clinton hits Trump on temper, but she's no picnic, either]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;UnruhHRCviolent&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Unruh, Bob (November 15, 2016). [https://www.wnd.com/2016/11/report-hillary-physically-violent-after-losing/ Report: Hillary 'physically violent' after losing]. ''WND''. Retrieved November 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After condemning Trump's pre-election refusal to accept election results regardless of outcome as a threat to democracy, Clinton donors funded a recount effort only in states Trump won which backfired and netted Trump a gain in popular vote totals. Wealthy donors who contributed over $1 billion to her campaign demanded an accounting for her loss, insisting without an independent, dispassionate review they could not be expected to continue contributing to the Democratic party in the future.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/hillary-clinton-campaign-donors-post-mortem-232715&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Clinton machine and Obama administrations responded by blaming [[Vladimir Putin]] and disgraced FBI Director James Comey for the loss rather than mismanagement and poor strategic planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Anti-Trump violence and hate crimes ===&lt;br /&gt;
After the election, childish [[leftists]] and [[anarchists]], who could not accept the results of the election, strongly protested Trump's victory and committed outrageous and extreme acts of vandalism and violence.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Protests&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chiaramonte, Perry (November 10, 2016). [https://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/10/trump-protests-intensify-as-doubts-swirl-about-spontaneity.html Trump protests intensify, as doubts swirl about spontaneity]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Trump supporters were the victims of numerous targeted attacks, brutal violence, and [[hate crime]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/10/video-emerges-group-beating-chicago-man-while-yelling-dont-vote-trump.html Video emerges of mob beating Chicago man while yelling 'don't vote Trump']. ''Fox News''. November 10, 2016. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2016/11/trump-supporter-15-beaten-during-rockville-protest/slide/1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A tech company corporate CEO threatened to murder Donald Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://bgr.com/2016/11/15/man-threatens-to-kill-trump-ceo-sniper/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The brutal and disturbing anti-Trump hate crimes (or hate crimes closely related to Trump's election) continued to occur into the next year.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LatestAntiTrump&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/05/facebook-live-attack-latest-in-string-anti-trump-assaults.html Facebook Live attack the latest in string of anti-Trump assaults]. ''Fox News''. January 5, 2017. Retrieved January 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Democrat leaders, Obama and the Clinton machine refused to condemn the hate and violence. Ads for paid protesters appeared on Craigslist. Many of these protests were likely organized and coordinated, as many protestors were bused in by Coach buses.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Protests&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite these attacks, liberals and leftists only focused on alleged attacks by Trump supporters against minorities and others (the false leftist narrative, although being blatantly false and one-sided, fits their manufactured narrative that Trump supporters are &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot; and that leftists are &amp;quot;tolerant&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;forgiving&amp;quot;, despite the opposite being true). It was found that despite the number of real anti-Trump attacks, several of the &amp;quot;pro-Trump&amp;quot; attacks were found to be hoaxes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LatestAntiTrump&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The ''shattered'' Clinton campaign ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tulsi-v-clinton-tweet.jpg|right|thumb|350px|Hillary Clinton rebooted her Vast Russian Conspiracy with an attack on [[Tulsi Gabbard]], a U.S. war hero.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton continued to blame &amp;quot;misogyny&amp;quot; (even from women) for her loss of the election, as well as supposed Russian meddling in the election, James Comey, and WikiLeaks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Breitman, Kendall (April 7, 2017). [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-explains-why-she-really-lost-trump-n743581 Hillary Clinton Explains Why She Really Lost to Trump]. ''NBC News''. Retrieved April 8, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kew, Ben (April 6, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2017/04/06/hillary-clinton-again-blames-misogyny-for-election-defeat/ Hillary Clinton Again Blames 'Misogyny' for Election Defeat]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 8, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2017, journalists Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes released the book ''Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign'' revealed that the Clinton campaign was a dysfunctional disaster and that numerous mistakes during the campaign contributed to her defeat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adams, Becket; Weaver, Al (April 18, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/im-sorry-clinton-campaign-disaster-laid-bare-in-new-book/article/2620518 'I'm sorry': Clinton campaign disaster laid bare in new book]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Geraghty, Jim (April 19, 2017). [https://www.nationalreview.com/article/446885/shattered-jonathan-allen-amie-parnes-clinton-campaign-dysfunction-revealed Shattered Illusions]. ''National Review''. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kakutani, Michiko (April 17, 2017). [https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/17/books/shattered-charts-hillary-clintons-course-into-the-iceberg.html?_r=0 'Shattered' Charts Hillary Clinton's Course Into the Iceberg]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The book reveals that Clinton did not plan on conceding the election until Obama told her to do so.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/4-excerpts-from-shattered-and-what-they-tell-us-about-clintons-loss/ Takeaways from the Clinton campaign autopsy &amp;quot;Shattered&amp;quot;]. ''CBS News''. April 18, 2017. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The book also revealed that within 24 hours after her loss, the Clinton campaign, particularly [[John Podesta]] and [[Robby Mook]], developed the claim of alleged collusion between Trump and Russia to give to the public as the center reason for the loss.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hudson, Jerome (April 21, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/21/shattered-revelation-clinton-campaign-hatched-russian-hacking-narrative-24-hours-after-hillarys-loss/ 'Shattered' Revelation: Clinton Campaign Hatched Russian Hacking Narrative 24 Hours After Hillary's Loss]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Allen &amp;amp; Amie Parnes (2017). ''[https://www.amazon.com/Shattered-Inside-Hillary-Clintons-Campaign/dp/0553447084 Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign]''. New York: Crown. ISBN 978-0553447088.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2017, former Democrat Vice President [[Joe Biden]] admitted, &amp;quot;I never thought [Clinton] was a great candidate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/19/biden-knocks-clinton-not-great-candidate.html Biden knocks Clinton: Not a 'great' candidate]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved May 19, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton blamed nearly everything except herself for her election loss.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://insider.foxnews.com/2017/06/01/list-everyone-everything-hillary-clinton-has-blamed-loss-trump Here's a List of Everyone &amp;amp; Everything Hillary Has Blamed for Her Loss]. ''Fox News Insider''. June 1, 2017. Retrieved June 1, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Concha, Joe (September 13, 2017). [https://thehill.com/homenews/media/350404-foxs-guilfoyle-clinton-mad-at-everybody Fox's Guilfoyle: Clinton 'mad at everybody']. ''The Hill''. Retrieved September 13, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Giaritelli, Anna (September 13, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-my-own-mistakes-werent-enough-to-lose-the-election/article/2634237 Hillary Clinton: My own mistakes weren't enough to lose the election]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 13, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She blamed figures both on the Right and Left,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nelson, Louis (September 12, 2017). [https://www.politico.eu/article/hillary-clinton-book-memoir-12-times-dishes-out-payback-in-her-tell-all-book/ 12 times Clinton dishes out payback in her tell-all book]. ''Politico''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as well as Chief Justice [[John Roberts]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lovelace, Ryan (September 11, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-blames-chief-justice-john-roberts-for-contributing-to-her-election-loss-in-new-book/article/2634059 Hillary Clinton blames Chief Justice John Roberts for contributing to her election loss in new book]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; blue collar workers,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wegmann, Philip (September 12, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-writes-that-jd-vance-was-right-hillbillies-lost-me-my-election/article/2634117 Hillary Clinton writes that J.D. Vance was right. Hillbillies lost me my election]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and misogynist white women. In her 2017 book ''What Happened'', in which she blamed many of those people, Clinton effectively stated that authoritarianism can be started through the questioning of leaders,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adams, Becket (September 12, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clintons-funny-idea-of-authoritarianism/article/2634180 Hillary Clinton's funny idea of authoritarianism]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and she stated that all Democrats should vote in favor of abortion every time even if they are pro-life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berry, Susan (September 12, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/12/hillary-clinton-democrats-who-are-pro-life-must-vote-to-promote-abortion/ Hillary Clinton: Democrats Who Are Pro-Life Must Vote to Promote Abortion]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jashinsky, Emily (September 11, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-urges-democratic-party-to-adopt-litmus-test-on-abortion-in-new-book/article/2634060 Hillary Clinton urges Democratic Party to adopt litmus test on abortion in new book]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She blamed at least 27 different people or entities for her loss.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Starr, Penny (November 8, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/08/27-excuses-hillary-clinton-has-made-for-her-2016-election-loss/ 27 Excuses Hillary Clinton Has Made for Her 2016 Election Loss]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved November 8, 2017.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adams, Becket (April 25, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/hillary-clinton-lost-and-shes-leaning-on-a-debunked-conspiracy-theory-to-explain-why https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/hillary-clinton-lost-and-shes-leaning-on-a-debunked-conspiracy-theory-to-explain-why]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved April 25, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By late 2019, when speculation was rife that she might enter the 2020 race because of the weak field, she still showed signs of not being over the emotional devastation of her 2016 loss. She was at that time blaming her loss on &amp;quot;these flashing videos that appear and then disappear and they’re on the dark web.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/hillary-clinton-blames-flashing-videos-that-appear-and-disappear-on-dark-web-for-her-2016-election-loss/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Later life ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Genesis 4 verse 6.jpg |right|350px |thumb |''Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?'' - Genesis 4:6]]&lt;br /&gt;
With the firing of FBI Director [[James Comey]] by President Trump, Clinton faced more [[legal]] problems in relation to pay-to-play schemes as [[Secretary of State]] and donations to the [[Clinton Foundation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2016 FBI director Comey reopened an investigation into Clinton due to substantiated suspicions that former Attorney General [[Loretta Lynch]] was covering for her.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (April 23, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/23/russians-hacked-democrats-plans-cheat-general-election/ The Russians Hacked Democrats' Plans to Cheat in the General Election, Too]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 23, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Comey revealed that Clinton had sent classified information to [[Anthony Weiner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wong, Kristina (May 3, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/03/comey-defends-himself-says-makes-him-mildly-nauseous-to-think-he-affected-election/ Comey: Anthony Weiner Received Classified Clinton Emails]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of May 2017, Clinton planned on forming per own PAC and becoming a paid speaker.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berger, Judson (May 3, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/03/clinton-obama-return-to-public-eye-with-new-ventures.html Clinton, Obama return to public eye with new ventures]. ''Fox News''. May 3, 2017. Retrieved May 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She created a PAC, called &amp;quot;Onward Together&amp;quot;, which intended to promote left-wing and [[Opposition to Donald Trump|anti-Trump]] causes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Weber, Joseph (May 18, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/18/clinton-pac-aims-to-boost-left-wing-anti-trump-groups-will-still-have-clout.html Clinton PAC aims to boost left-wing, anti-Trump groups – will she still have clout?] ''Fox News''. Retrieved May 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite criticizing Trump during the campaign for refusing to accept the election results as legitimate, Clinton did not rule out doing the same thing after the election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yilek, Caitlin (September 18, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-wont-rule-out-questioning-legitimacy-of-presidential-election/article/2634777 Hillary Clinton won't rule out questioning legitimacy of presidential election]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018, the Texas Board of Education voted to pull Clinton from the state's social studies curriculum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Farber, Madeline (September 14, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/09/14/texas-board-ed-votes-to-pull-hillary-clinton-and-helen-keller-from-social-studies-curriculum.html Texas Board of Ed votes to pull Hillary Clinton and Helen Keller from social studies curriculum]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved September 15, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even at the funeral of Rep. [[Elijah Cummings]], Hillary Clinton could not restrain herself and made sickening comments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dmlnewsapp.com/video-tammy-bruce-slams-hillary-clinton-comments-elijah-cummings-funeral/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Americans were on lockdown and dying under the [[coronavirus]] attack, Hillary shamefully mocked and ridiculed their suffering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/03/28/hillary-clinton-lambasted-for-disgusting-potshot-that-exploits-us-virus-tragedy-to-make-trump-look-bad-902211&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://100percentfedup.com/hillary-clinton-destroyed-for-attempt-at-snarky-humor-aimed-at-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;You know, I'm going to start thanking the woman who cleans the restroom in the building I work in. I'm going to start thinking of her as a human being.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Case Against Hillary Clinton'', [[Peggy Noonan]], p. 55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Clinton Cash]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Freedom of Choice Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obamagate timeline 2009-2015]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obamagate timeline|Obamagate timeline 2016 election year]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russiagate timeline 2017]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russiagate timeline|Russiagate timeline 2018]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Uranium One bribery scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benghazigate timeline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hillary Rodham Clinton facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hillary Rodham Clinton's net worth]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hillary Rodham Clinton and Watergate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dolly Kyle Browning]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Clinton scandal]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Awan investigation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sandy Berger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Schumer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Honorarium]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FusionGPS]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marc Elias]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.hillaryclinton.com Hillary Rodham Clinton 2016 campaign website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://foia.state.gov/Search/results.aspx?searchText=Clinton+Email&amp;amp;beginDate=&amp;amp;endDate=&amp;amp;publishedBeginDate=&amp;amp;publishedEndDate=&amp;amp;caseNumber= 12,173 declassified stolen Clinton emails recovered by State Department]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://foia.state.gov/Search/Results.aspx?collection=Clinton_Email 30,322 stolen Clinton emails recovered by State Department under the FOIA]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.rt.com/usa/complete-emails-guccifer-clinton-554/ Stolen Clinton emails recovered by Russian Television]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton Declassified FBI criminal investigation documents]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;url=https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/NARA-Whitewater-OIC-report-pg-17-38.pdf&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwiCmYSQuPLOAhUUT2MKHXvlDfIQFggeMAE&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFsX5z4OidXZMAJTkf5XsXn-B58QQ&amp;amp;sig2=2Uuf3pYqTlZPGjM2k11X6Q Summary of Evidence for Draft Indictment], Office of the Independent Counsel, 4/10/98&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.scribd.com/doc/229667084/State-of-Arkansas-V-Thomas-Alfred-Taylor State of Arkansas v Thomas Alfred Taylor]. Official record of Hillary Rodham Clinton's 1975 defense of a child rapist.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://akdart.com/lib136.html Hillary Clinton Scandals].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Deep State}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Globalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Clinton, Hillary Rodham}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hillary Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:First Ladies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Clinton Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Clinton Scandals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2008 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Cabinet]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Corruption]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Woman as destroyer]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Globalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Secretaries of State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2016 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2016 Presidential Election]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Failed Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Best Selling Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biden Putsch]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soros Mercenaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1990s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2000s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2010s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worst Liberal Politicians]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hillary_Rodham_Clinton&amp;diff=1733528</id>
		<title>Hillary Rodham Clinton</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Hillary_Rodham_Clinton&amp;diff=1733528"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T23:54:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
| name = Hillary Rodham Clinton&lt;br /&gt;
| image = Clintonfly2crop (2).jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| party = [[Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
| spouse = [[Bill Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
| religion = &lt;br /&gt;
| offices = &lt;br /&gt;
  {{Officeholder/secretary (cabinet)&lt;br /&gt;
    | of = State&lt;br /&gt;
    | state = United States&lt;br /&gt;
    | number = 67th&lt;br /&gt;
    | deputy = n&lt;br /&gt;
    | president = [[Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | terms = January 21, 2009 – January 30, 2013&lt;br /&gt;
    | preceded = [[Condoleezza Rice]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | former = y&lt;br /&gt;
    | succeeded = [[John Forbes Kerry]]&lt;br /&gt;
  }}&lt;br /&gt;
  {{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
    | state = New York&lt;br /&gt;
    | terms = January 3, 2001 – January 21, 2009&lt;br /&gt;
    | preceded = [[Daniel Patrick Moynihan]]&lt;br /&gt;
    | former = y&lt;br /&gt;
    | succeeded = [[Kirsten Gillibrand]]&lt;br /&gt;
  }}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hillary ''Rod-ham'' Clinton''' (born October 26, 1947, age {{age|1947|10|26}}) is a former American career politician. Previously, she served as a First Lady and as a Secretary of State. She ran as a Democratic Presidential candidate in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.  Due to her scandals, [[Donald Trump]] referred to her as &amp;quot;Crooked Hillary&amp;quot; in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Clinton won the Democratic Presidential nomination while under [[criminal]] investigation&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://youtu.be/mzs3K-oEjOA?t=1854 ''White House Admits Hillary Clinton Is Under Criminal Investigation'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/10/press-briefing-press-secretary-josh-earnest-692016 ''Press Briefing by Press Secretary Josh Earnest, 6/9/2016'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was endorsed by the [[Ku Klux Klan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kkk-grand-dragon-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Multiple subsequent inquiries determined the [[Obama administration]] seriously mishandled the Clinton investigations with numerous improprieties. Clinton lost the [[United States presidential election, 2016|2016 Presidential election]] to [[Donald Trump]] and blamed [[FBI]] Director [[James Comey]], white men, and self-hating women controlled by their husbands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most people who voted for Clinton in the 2016 Democratic primaries were unaware Clinton was under criminal investigation at the time, as the [[mainstream media]] failed to report it. Subsequent [[leak]]s of [[Democratic National Committee]] emails revealed primary election tampering, vote rigging, and voter suppression. [[Putin]] enemies in the [[Ukrainian]] government [[collude]]d with the Obama administration and Clinton campaign to create the [[Trump-Russia collusion hoax]] during the 2016 election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://circa.com/politics/alf-bank-in-russia-said-donald-trump-computer-connections-may-have-been-hacker-hoax&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aided by liberal media, Clinton burst on the national stage in 1992 with a politically-motivated lie she knew not to be true&amp;amp;nbsp;— calling Gennifer Flowers &amp;quot;the daughter of Willie Horton&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/old_bern_kenobi/status/783033464853409792?lang=en&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;— and exited the stage the same way by calling Donald Trump the handmaid of Vladimir Putin. She has been described by fellow Democrats as &amp;quot;the queen of warmongers, embodiment of [[corruption]], and personification of the rot that has sickened the [[Democratic Party]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/gabbard-hits-back-at-queen-of-warmongers-clinton/ar-AAIZRs9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton is known for her [[racist]] remarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2016/04/bernie-sanders-calls-out-hillary-clinton-for-racist-language.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Health matters ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Ghislaine Clinton.PNG|right|350px|thumb|Bill Clinton and [[Ghislaine Maxwell]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2012 Hillary was reported to have suffered a concussion. Initial reports suggested it occurred after a &amp;quot;fainting&amp;quot; spell; other reports stated she suffered the concussion on board a C-12 Huron military aircraft which skidded off the runaway while in Iran to jumpstart negotiations on sanctions and the nuke deal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/xTMw_w4IhBw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The crash occurred on or about 8 December 2012; Hillary had a public &amp;quot;fainting&amp;quot; spell on 15 December 2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/2f-_vtw0jWg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which then led to reports she suffered a concussion. Reports say she was not hospitalized at that time. In a 24 December email she refers to having a &amp;quot;cracked head.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://70news.wordpress.com/2016/08/23/wikileaks-hillarys-crackhead-and-dementia-bombshell-hillary-clinton-used-drugs-for-dementia-and-parkinsons-disease-asked-nfl-chief-to-help-her-deal-with/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2020 election ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Presidential election}}&lt;br /&gt;
After popular Democratic presidential candidate [[Tulsi Gabbard]] confronted Hillary Clinton on her criminal and treasonous activities, Hillary Clinton backed out of a joint appearance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7591361/Hillary-CANCELS-appearance-summit-Tulsi-Gabbard-scheduled-speak.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gabbard responded with her own viral video that garnered over 2 million views in less than 24 hours.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1185988329742798848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even ''Rolling Stone'' magazine observed: &amp;quot;America laughed at Hillary Clinton's remarks about Tulsi Gabbard, but her ideas fit perfectly in the intellectual mainstream. Hillary Clinton is nuts. She's also not far from the Democratic Party mainstream, which has been pushing the same line for years&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/clinton-gabbard-russian-asset-jill-stein-901593/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton was questioned by Trevor Noah how she killed [[Jeffrey Epstein]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/11/01/hillary-clinton-laughs-off-question-about-killing-jeffrey-epstein/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Neurological disorder ===&lt;br /&gt;
Significant concerns have arose in late summer 2016 about Hillary Clinton's mental and neurological fitness. The Clintons have never complied with requests to disclose their medical records, which has led to widespread speculation among experts and laymen about both Clinton's health based on observation and what has been reported. In December 2011, a series of emails were passed between the staff and Hillary in which she inquired about the prescription medication, Provigil, which suggests [[Parkinson's disease]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2016/08/23/emails-top-hillary-aide-was-researching-drug-that-treats-parkinsons-alzheimers/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the 2016 campaign trail it was obvious Hillary had trouble walking and keeping her balance. Other unusual occurrences in public medical experts described as a combination of brain freezes, blackouts, seizures or symptoms of post traumatic brain injury. Even while Secretary, Hillary began missing a series of important meetings, which included testifying before Congress and a [[national security]] briefing at the White House on the Benghazi attack. She canceled without notice her participation in the Friends of Syria forum in Marrakesh when her presence was vitally needed, as NATO was detecting suspicious movements of the Syrian army's chemical weapons. Her assistant, [[Huma Abedin]], noted in an email &amp;quot;she is often confused&amp;quot; because of her incapacitation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3320900/Newly-released-email-shows-aide-Huma-Abedin-warned-colleagues-Hillary-confused-needed-hand-holding-calls-foreign-leaders.html#ixzz4Iu8Nujvw]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What was particularly quixotic was the behavior of the Clinton campaign in spinning the story. Hillary's peculiar facial expressions at odd moments while talking to people could not go unnoticed. Or her coughing fits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A candidate, like a sitting president, typically travels with a press pool in tow. However the Clinton campaign has done everything imaginable to keep national reporters from getting too close to the candidate. When Hillary was rushed from the scene after collapsing at [[Ground Zero]] during a 9/11 commemoration, a 90-minute news blackout ensued. Repeated questions from reporters went unanswered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article101235582.html#emlnl=Morning_Newsletter&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When she emerged on an open street without a security detail, the person did not look at all like the Hillary we've come to know, nor the Hillary who had moments earlier been diagnosed with a serious illness. Nor the Hillary who broke down in an extended coughing fit two dsys earlier on national television on opening day of the general election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One instance of an on-camera freeze (see discussion on dyskinesia, below), it was speculated, was triggered by the cross-talk of several persons at once, such as regularly occurs in a press conference.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/OqbDBRWb63s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hillary did not have a press conference for nine months in 2016. Hillary is accompanied in all public appearances by an attending physician who most mistake for part of her security detail. The physician, who is always at her side, has been photographed ready and armed with an auto-injector syringe carrying the anti-seizure medication, Diazepam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All the speculation and rumors could have been ended, of course, if the Clinton campaign had opened up and been honest about a matter that is of no slight or insignificant purpose to the American people. During an interview with Erin Burnett on CNN, Dr. David Scheiner, President Obama's former physician, insisted that a two-page note from Hillary's doctor was insufficient.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.inquisitr.com/3471504/hillary-clinton-needs-a-thorough-neurological-exam-obamas-doctor-says/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Milton Wolf, President Obama's cousin, called the diagnosis of Lisa Bardack, one of Hillary's physicians, &amp;quot;pure fiction&amp;quot;, noting the diagnosis does not appear in any medical tectbook.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://usdefensewatch.com/2016/09/dr-milton-wolf-obamas-cousin-catches-lie-in-hillary-clinton-medical-report/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even more frightening, reporters who have discussed the matter publicly have been fired. Dr. Drew was fired by [[CNN]] after six years,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/08/26/dr-drew-show-canceled-days-after-his-negative-speculation-about-hillary-clintons-health/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the [[The Huffington Post]] terminated David Seaman who had written hundreds of articles over many years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/huffpo-writer-questions-hillary-health-happened/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2104.htm Hillary Clinton Colostomy Bag Cover-up Consumes US Media Giants, Puts Debates In Doubt], Sorcha Faal, August 30, 2016. www.whatdoesitmesn.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Seaman now lives in fear of his life and personal safety&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Background ===&lt;br /&gt;
The first known incident of a problem was in 2005 when Mrs. Clinton collapsed on stage in Buffalo during a speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-01-31-clinton-collapse_x.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2009 Hillary fell and broke her elbow. Details of the incident have been kept secret.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stage 2 Parkinson's Disease is marked by tremors, changes in facial expression, difficulty walking and the person's posture starts to change. Hillary is unable to remain sitting very long without being proped up by pillows.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://heatst.com/politics/must-see-photos-of-hillary-clinton-propped-up-on-pillows/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Stage 3 marks a major turning point in the progression of the disease. Many of the symptoms are the same as in Stage 2, however decreased reflexes and loss of balance occurs. Movement becomes slower. This is why falls become more common in Stage 3.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.healthline.com/health/parkinsons/stages#Overview1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Medical experts cite this is observable evidence caused by a &amp;quot;break down&amp;quot; in key areas of the brain, which includes the cortex, pons, basal ganglia, cerebellum and brainstem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During a December 2015 televised event, Hillary was five minutes late getting on stage to the debate which already started because she refused to share a bathroom facility with another female staffer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/12/20/hillary-clinton-missed-debate-wouldnt-share-bathroom/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was the beginning of speculation on Hillary's use of catheeters or other prosthetic devices consistent with the effects of advanced Parkinson's disease and other forms of traumatic brain injury.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the campaign trail Hillary has confused Donald Trump with her husband, appears to have had momentary blackouts while speaking, involuntary head movements and bobbing, needs help walking, balancing, getting in and out if vehicles, or going up a flight of stairs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/Zr1IDQ2V1eM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She wears tinted sunglasses and excessivelly baggy clothes in the heat of summer to hide what photographic evidence suggests are catheeters or colostomy apparatices.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2104.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary abruptly left a [[9/11]] commemorative ceremony at the site of the [[World Trade Center]] due to a very public medical episode. Her knees buckled and she lost a shoe as her [[Secret Service]] detail loaded her into a van, despite protestations from the Clinton camp that her health is fine and discussion of it being limited to conspiracy kooks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/pzf/status/775002372875644928?s=09&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With more than two full months to election day, even before the much publicized 9/11 collapse, Hillary cancelled all but three scheduled appearances on her calendar, sending out surrogates Bill Clinton, [[Chelsea Clinton|Chelsea]], [[Tim Kaine]], and in some cases [[Joe Biden]], the President or [[Michelle Obama]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://hillaryspeeches.com/scheduled-events/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hillary prefers to stay home and measure her strength day by day to meet the rigors of campaigning and facing the public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/whats-wrong-hillary-wears-heavy-coat-black-pants-nantucket-fundraiser-august/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Blood clotting ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary has three known instances of blood clotting, or thrombosis. The first was a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in her right leg in 1998. Deep vein thrombosis is a serious condition that occurs when a clump of blood forms into a gelatinous, solid state in a vein deep inside the body. She told the White House physician that she was too busy and refused hospitalization, so was treated as an outpatient at Bethesda Naval Hospital. She later described the experience of the clot as her &amp;quot;scariest moment.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Doctors found a second clot in her legs in 2009, a fact not widely known until Dr. Lisa Bardack issued a clean bill of health in July 2015 in preparation of her campaign for the Democratic nomination for the presidency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then came her skull fracture, concussion, and brain clot in 2012 and 2013 under mysterious circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a catch all category defined as &amp;quot;an alteration in brain function, or other evidence of brain pathology, caused by an external force&amp;quot; rated from mild (those with no immediate recognizable effects) to severe. An MRI revealed a dangerous blood clot had formed in her brain. Hillary was hospitalized at the New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center. Dr. Lisa Bardack denied Hillary suffered a stroke, but Obama administration aides reported she had.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/obama-staff-dropped-bombshell-hillary-medical-details-two-strokes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Bardack issued public statements saying that she was being treated with bloodthinners (coagulants) and that &amp;quot;The secretary is making excellent progress.&amp;quot; [[NBC News]] medical correspondent Robert Bazell was skeptical about the blood clot being caused by an earlier concussion because, he said, it if were, it would not be treated with anti-coagulents. &amp;quot;So either it's not really related to the concussion and she's got a blood clot in her leg or something, or there's something else going on that we're not being told.&amp;quot; Chelsea Clinton was seen departing the hospital in tears.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/hillary-clinton-admitted-hospital-blood-clot-article-1.1230031&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bill Clinton later reported it took Hillary 6 months to recuperate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary was diagnosed with a right transverse sinus venous thrombosis in the vein situated in the space between the brain and the skull behind the right ear, a rare and potentially life-threatening malady. Dr. Alan Boulos, chief of neurosurgery at Albany Medical Center speculated a genetic predisposition made her vulnerable to clotting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014, preping for her presidential run, Hillary told Diane Sawyer of [[ABC News]], &amp;quot;I'm probably on blood thinners for the rest of my life&amp;quot;, and vehemently denied any brain injury despite abundant medical evidence provided to the public proving otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Subcortical vascular dementia ===&lt;br /&gt;
A Twitter posting in August 2016 about Hillary's advanced medical condition was reportedly knocked down by Hillary's team and alleged Fact Checkers as a hoax and conspiracy. The reports are said to have been leaked possibly by the father of one of the physicians treating Hillary Clinton. The physician's name is Dr. Daniel Fleck. His father's name is Vincent Fleck. Vincent Fleck was found dead less than 24 hours after the reported leak. The leaked files are from the office of the physician who authored the two-page clean bill of health, and contradict what she distributed publicly. The clean bill of health is viewed as a whitewash by the Clinton campaign, intended to serve as the official response to requests for Hillary's medical records.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eutimes.net/2016/08/father-of-doctor-treating-hillary-clinton-for-dementia-mysteriously-dies/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two-page clean bill of health was written by Dr. Lisa Bardack, who claimed Hillary was in &amp;quot;excellant physical condition&amp;quot;. Bardack said Clinton was diagnosed with a &amp;quot;transverse sinus venous thrombosis,&amp;quot; a type of blood clot in the brain. She was given blood thinners to dissolve the clot. Hillary experienced double-vision and had been given prism glasses to wear. Bardack wrote that by 2013 Hillary Clinton had &amp;quot;complete resolution of the effects of the concussion&amp;quot;, which any [[NFL]] fan and layman can tell is complete nonsense. No mention was made of Hillary's persistent coughing fits or loss of balance. Bardack noted Hillary also suffered from deep vein thrombosis (blood clotting) in 1998 and 2009 and takes the medications Armour Thyoid and Coumadin (an anticoagulant blood thinner) daily. Armour Thyroid is an old fashion brand name remedy of desiccated thyroid extract from dried [[beef]] and [[pork]] [[thyroid]] glands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The earliest leaked document from Dr. Bardack's office is dated February 5, 2014, stating the patient's present complaint is &amp;quot;Blacking out for short periods of time, uncontrollable twitching, memory loss, fatigue.&amp;quot; It lists the [[diagnosis]] of &amp;quot;Complex Partial Seizures, Subcortical Vascular Dementia.&amp;quot; Subcortical vascular dementia is caused by widespread microscopic damage to the brain resulting from hardening of the arteries that supply blood to the subcortical areas of the brain. The leak further notes &amp;quot;the patient is having signs of more frequent Complex Partial Seizures.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://allnewspipeline.com/Hillary_Clinton_Medical_Records_Released.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Levadopa (L-dopa) is considered the most effective treatment of Parkinson's disease. Dyskinesia, or involuntary muscle movements, is a side affect of longterm treatment with levadopa.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|&amp;quot;Dyskinetic movements look like smooth tics&amp;amp;nbsp;— sometimes like an uncoordinated dance. People who experience dyskinesia sometimes mask the involuntary movement with finalistic movements (if the arm starts moving on its own, they might bring it to their head and adjust their hair, as if it was planned)&amp;quot;, according to the Michael J. Fox Foundation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.michaeljfox.org/understanding-parkinsons/living-with-pd/topic.php?dyskinesia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tinted blue sunglasses are considered a therapuetic remedy to alleviate symptoms of tardive dyskinesia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://commons.pacificu.edu/pt/93/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=5e6_1473703406&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Coughing and aspiration pneumonia ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary's many coughing fits which have become commonplace is a serious symptom of an underlying progression of Parkinson's disease. The coughing is caused by a difficulty in swallowing, called dysphagia. The coughing or throat clearing comes after eating or drinking, and a feeling as if food is stuck in the throat. As Parkinson's progresses, swallowing can become very difficult. Food or liquid can get into the [[lung]]s causing aspiration pneumonia. Aspiration pneumonia is the leading cause of death among Parkinson's disease sufferers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.michaeljfox.org/foundation/news-detail.php?swallowing-and-parkinson-disease&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Labor Day weekend, the traditional start of the Presidential general election, Hillary was on the offensive, choosing Cleveland&amp;amp;nbsp;— the city where Trump had just been nominated&amp;amp;nbsp;— to kickoff her campaign. Hillary was hampered by a coughing fit which she could neither suppress nor overcome. She tried compensating by using practiced gestures making the speech seemingly ridiculous. With a large media contingent in attendance she wanted to be hardhitting and strong, replete with the obligatory anti-Trump throw away lines. Rather, her voice was weak, her delivery frail, and her countenance pitiful in forcing herself to go through the motions just to satisfy her own mortal ambitions and the partisan truculency of her audience, in denial of reality, blinded by false hope, as she heaped derision on their fellow citizens and imaginary enemies. Once again, the whole world was forced to endure this sad, pathetic spectacle.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theamericanmirror.com/hacking-hillary-complete-timeline-2016-coughing-fits/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the collapse at Ground Zero on 9/11, Hillary's press machine put out the story she was diagnosed with generic pneumonia. Again, Dr. Bardack claimed she was being trested with anti-biotics for a bacterial infection; however that did not stop the Democratic nominee from exposing a small child to the infectious disease for a quick photo-op moments after the medical event.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-dead-zone-1473790527&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Clinton team claimed it was no big deal, &amp;quot;we all had it&amp;quot;, meaning they knew it was infectious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.people.com/article/hillary-clinton-staff-sick-pneumonia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mothers on Twitter expressed bewilderment and horror that Hillary, with a bacterial infection, was transported to Chelsea Clinton's home where a two-month old infant was present, rather than a hospital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Treatment ===&lt;br /&gt;
After the release of the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; two-page statement on Hillary's health by Dr. Bardack, neurological experts and physicians weighed in. Dr. Drew Pinsky, &amp;quot;America's most trusted physician&amp;quot; according to CNN's subsidiary ''Headline News'' (HLN),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20160830040320/http://www.hlntv.com/shows/dr-drew&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was asked if Hillary was okay. Millions of people had seen the photos of Hillary being helped up stairs or videos of her facial contortions and head bobbing. Dr. Drew responded that he was gravely concerned not just about her health, but her [[health care]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Drew had consulted with Dr. Robert Huizenga, an internist-pulmonologist, and evaluated the medical record she released. She had two episodes of deep venous thrombosis (blood clots in the leg). She also has hypothyroidism (thyroid isn't producing enough hormone). She'd been treated with Armour Thyroid, &amp;quot;something that we used to use back in the '60s&amp;quot;, Dr. Drew and Huizenga both remarked, &amp;quot;Hmmm, that's weird.&amp;quot; Then in response to the anticoagulent Coumadin, Dr. Drew observed, &amp;quot;That's weird, because Coumadin really isn't even used anymore. Now we use Eliquis or Xarelto, things like this. Certainly the presidential candidate would get one of the newer anti-coagulates.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Bardack, who pronounced Hillary in &amp;quot;excellent physical condition&amp;quot; in the same public release made the diagnosis of Transverse Sinus Thrombosis, an exceedingly rare clot in the collecting system for the cerebral spinal fluid. Dr Drew remarked, it &amp;quot;guarantees that somebody has something wrong with their coagulation system.&amp;quot; Dr. Drew went on to explain how the hypothyroid treatment, Armour Thyroid, may be the &amp;quot;very medicine causing this problem, and they're using an old-fashioned medicine to treat it. What is going on with her health care? It's bizarre.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then addresding the falls and concussion, when she hit her head, she had to wear prism glasses because of her double vision. &amp;quot;That is brain damage, and it's affecting her balance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freebeacon.com/politics/dr-drew-gravely-concerned-clintons-health-archaic-treatments/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Dr. Drew gave this interview, CNN contacted him and asked him to retract his comments. Dr. Drew refused. Eight days later he was summarily fired.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Daniel Scheiner, who was the personal physician to President Obama and is not an employee of CNN, told CNN before the blackout on Hillary's health reporting, &amp;quot;There are a number of questions I have. First of all, she's also 68 years old, and while I think that medical letter was well written and was very professional&amp;amp;nbsp;... it's not enough. For example, she's on Coumadin, a medication to prevent blood clots&amp;amp;nbsp;... I'd like to know how well she's being controlled. That's a difficult drug to use. Also, I think she should have&amp;amp;nbsp;... a thorough neurological examination in 2016. We know what happens to football players, how they begin to lose their cognitive ability.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/IFxe-jvME8k&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Scheiner will not be invited back to CNN to discuss Hillary's health anytime soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Possible replacement for health concerns ===&lt;br /&gt;
Following Hillary's high-profile collapse on Sunday morning September 11, 2016 at Ground Zero it was no longer possible to deny Hillary's debilitating condition as a [[vast right-wing conspiracy]]. Former [[MSNBC]] anchor Dan Schuster, while the blackout on Hillary's condition was still fresh, tweeted that DNC officials were pondering an emergency meeting to replace Hillary Clinton. By Monday afternoon discussions were confirmed by former DNC Chairman Dan Fowler who was appointed by President Bill Clinton to oversee his 1996 reelection. Fowler insists the open discussions were about process for replacing a nominee, not the actual replacement. A singular precedent exists, the 1972 replacement of Sen. Tom Eagleton with [[Sargent Shriver]] as VP on the Democratic ticket, an event many considered as sealing the fate of Sen. George McGovern's fledgling bid for the presidency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DNC rules are somewhat simple as to filling a vacancy in the nomination process. Not so clear is the DNC's ability to create a vacancy by removing a candidate. After its latest scandal culminating in the removal of Chairperson [[Deborah Wasserman Schultz]] for alleged party rule and ethical violations in delegate rigging and voter suppression of Bernie Sanders supporters, Donna Brazile was appointed as interim chair. While highly partisan, Brazile can be considered that rare breed of Democrat who puts party interests ahead of the personal ambitions of the Clintons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the DNC's 447 members, 179 constitute a quorum. The DNC chair is vested with many discretionary powers, such as the ability to call an emergency meeting. Filling a vacancy however, requires consent of the full committee. According to Elaine Kamarck, a 20-year veteran of the DNC Rules Committee, the selection process is wide open, and the top post does not automatically devolve upon [[Tim Kaine]], a former DNC chair himself who won a majority of delegates at the convention as the successor to the president in the event of death, incapacition, or vacancy. Others speculate such a convocation would degenerate into politicking for various interest groups represented by the likes of Bernie Sanders, who failed to win a majority at the convention, or Joe Biden, who received no delegate support at all at the Philadelphia conclave.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/hillary-clinton-health-replace-contingency-228037&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Rasmussen poll found 48% of likely Democratic voters thought Bernie Sanders should be the nominee if health issues forced Hillary out. 22% say Vice President Joe Biden should be the nominee, while only 14% opted for vice presidential candidate Tim Kaine. 9% of Democrats think it should be someone else.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/which_democrat_should_replace_hillary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Background and positions ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary and Bill Clinton met in 1972 while studying law at [[Yale University]]. Inspired by [[Alabama]] Democrat Gov. [[George Wallace]] and his wife Gov. [[Lurleen Wallace]], the two forged a pact to help each other's career&amp;amp;nbsp;— when one was termed-limited out, the other takes over.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-bill-hillary-clinton-marriage-52-years-20140718-story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2016/07/27/opinions/bill-clinton-hillary-clinton-marriage-drexler/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.chicagotribune.com/chinews-mtblog-2007-11-obama_on_the_clinton_secret_pa-story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They worked as a team on [[George McGovern]]'s [[1972 presidential election|1972 presidential campaign]] and then on Bill's first unsuccessful bid for the U.S House in 1974.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She became a First Lady, U.S. Senator, Secretary of State and Democratic presidential nominee. According to financial disclosure statements, she has served uninterruptedly as Secretary/Treasurer of the Clinton Family Foundation since 2001.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://guccifer2.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/clintons-pfd-2015.pdf Executive Branch Personnel Public Financial Disclosure Report], OGE Form 278, Hillary Rodham Clinton, 05/15/15, p.19&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She is the wife of former President [[Bill Clinton]] who was [[impeach]]ed for providing false testimony and covering up sexual misconduct.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/articles122098.htm|title=Approved Articles of Impeachment|date=December 20, 1998|access-date=November 2, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Mr. Clinton has been accused of violent [[sexual assault]] by numerous surviving victims over many years,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/643475466490388480 Hillary Clinton on Twitter 10:24 AM&amp;amp;nbsp;— 14 Sep 2015].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; nonetheless Hillary has stood by him and attacked his accusers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.prorev.com/whtwtrr.htm Clinton Scandal Clips from The Progressive Review] June 2000&amp;amp;nbsp;— Aug 2000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She is an [[elitist]], [[liberal]], [[pro-abortion]] advocate, supports the death penalty, federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research, [[same-sex marriage]] (which she originally opposed but flip-flopped once popular opinion shifted in favor of it, as did many other Democrat politicians during the 1990s and 2000s), and civil unions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI Hillary Clinton lying for 13 minutes straight&amp;amp;nbsp;— video]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Her manipulation of racial politics and victims of sex crimes in the 1992, 1996, 2008, and 2016 presidential elections has left her with an abysmal record in the fight for [[civil rights]], fairness, equal treatment of women and minorities and victims of sex crimes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Early history ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article [[Hillary Clinton early life and career]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton was born in the rich white suburbs of Chicago. She attended Maine East High School, where she wrote for the school newspaper, participated in student council, was chairperson of the Young Republicans, and was selected for National Honor Society.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Whitehouse.gov&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |title=Hillary Rodham Clinton |url=https://www.whitehouse.gov/1600/first-ladies/hillaryclinton |publisher=The White House |access-date=June 28, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Carl Bernstein]] has chronicled the history of mental illness and depression which runs in the Rodham family. Her uncle attempted to hang himself but eventually died as an alcoholic in a fire while smoking in bed. Her other uncle died of coronary thrombosis or blood clotting in the heart. Her brothers lived &amp;quot;in a fog of melancholia.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Her father was emotionally abusive to her mother and the whole household; neighbors could not understand why her mother wouldn't leave him, despite her constantly expressing a desire to do so. Or his willingness to see her leave. This was before Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty, so it wasn't that easy to break up a family.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bernstein describes her father as, &amp;quot;a sour, unfulfilled man whose children suffered his relentless, demeaning sarcasm and misanthropic inclination, endured his embarrassing parsimony, and silently accepted his humiliation and verbal abuse of their mother&amp;amp;nbsp;... he had almost no recognizable enthusiasms or pretense to lightness as he descended into continuous bullying, ill-humor, complaint, and dejection.&amp;quot; Her notorious temper and abusive attitude toward underlings was inherited from her father.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/hillary-clintons-strengths-and-anger-white-house-revealed&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Her father was a Republican and her mother a Democrat, they used to joke how they cancelled each other's vote out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She attended Wellesley College, which at the time was segregated by sex, and graduated in 1969 during the height of radical opposition to the Vietnam War. She graduated with honors based on her 92-page senior thesis entitled ''&amp;quot;There Is Only the Fight&amp;amp;nbsp;...&amp;quot;: An Analysis of the Alinsky Model.'' The subject was famed [[community organizer]] [[Saul Alinsky]]. When Clinton became First Lady, researchers sought access to the document, but the White House asked Wellesley to hide the embarrassment. Wellesley complied and refused access to researchers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1969 to 1973, she attended Yale Law School where she worked on the editorial board of the ''Yale Review of Law and Social Action''.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;arkhc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web |url=http://www.encyclopediaofarkansas.net/encyclopedia/entry-detail.aspx?entryID=2744 |title=Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton (1947–) |work=The Encyclopedia of Arkansas History &amp;amp; Culture |access-date=June 28, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During her second year, she worked at the Yale Child Study Center which involved research on early childhood brain development. In the late spring of 1971 she, among others, got involved with [[Bill Clinton]]. [[Yoko Ono]], widow of [[Beatle]] songwriter [[John Lennon]], claims to have had a brief romantic fling with Hillary at this time. Ono told reporters in 2016 her election &amp;quot;would be a great advancement for [[LGBT]] and Women rights in America&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/yoko-ono-i-had-an-affair-with-hillary-clinton-in-the-70s/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ever the ambitious opportunist, she accepted an appointment to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Impeachment during the [[Watergate scandal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/features/2015-11-05/how-richard-nixon-created-hillary-clinton How Richard Nixon Created Hillary Clinton], Sam Tanenhaus, Nov 5, 2015. bloomberg.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberal sycophantic [[sexist]]s loyal to Bill Clinton deny she received this appointment on her own merit. They claim the position was offered to Bill first, and when he refused he suggested Rodham for it, which is highly unlikely. The appointment was made by John Doar, a Republican counsel on the committee. Given her Republican credentials as chairperson of the Wellesley Young Republicans, and her previous employment on Capitol Hill in 1968 in the office of the Ranking Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, Rep. Melvin Laird who became Nixon's Defense Secretary, and the fact she had better grades than Bill at Yale Law School, this appears to be just another leftover highly facitious claim in building the Bill Clinton myth and mystique.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Nixon resigned she headed to Arkansas where Bill was carrying on with several other women including a childhood sweetheart who reports Hillary smelled so bad from not showering it made her gag.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2059308/bill-clinton-nicknamed-bad-smelling-hillary-the-warden-but-wanted-a-baby-to-quash-rumours-she-was-a-lesbian-his-long-term-lover-claims/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bill and Hillary had mapped out personal and political career ambitions together and a [[States Rights]] agenda to accomplish it. Bill unsuccessfully ran for Congress in 1974. The two married on October 11, 1975. He was elected Governor in 1978, defeated in 1980, resumed it uninterruptedly til he became president. Bill said she only wanted a child so people wouldn't think she's a lesbian, and daughter Chelsea was born in 1980. When a [[Federal court]] ruled the Clintons violated the [[Voting Rights Act]] with their legislative reapportionment plan,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;42 U.S.C. 1973&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; their grip on Arkansas was slipping and they began making plans for a play on Washington.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a lawyer Hillary is an expert in medical confidentiality laws. Sam Smith of the leftist ''Progressive Review'' reported in 1998 an incident which occurred after Bill Clinton's electoral defeat in 1980. Bill Clinton arrived in a Little Rock emergency room with a drug overdose. Smith wrote,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Hillary Clinton had been notified by phone and had instructed the hospital staff that Clinton's personal physician would be arriving soon. When Mrs. Clinton arrived, she told both of the resident physicians on duty that night that they would never practice medicine in the United States if word leaked out about Clinton's drug problem. Reportedly, she pinned one of the doctors up against the wall, both hands pressed against his shoulders, as she gave her dire warning.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://prorev.com/connex.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Inslaw and the PROMIS technology ===&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Inslaw Inc]]''' developed the famous PROMIS software, an NCIC-type tracking technology incorporating numerous databases such as court records, financial institutions, utility companies, etc. Inslaw was forced into bankruptcy in 1985 because the US Justice Dept., which contracted to purchase it, reneged on its obligations. Pirated versions of the software were sold by US intelligence worldwide to 88 foreign intelligence agencies, and other organizations such as banks, which included a &amp;quot;backdoor&amp;quot; for US intelligence to hack into. Hillary Clinton was the intellectual property lawyer for a company that obtained and marketed to banks copies of the stolen PROMIS software.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/m1GEnF1pdZ0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PROMIS software explains why Bill Clinton never uses email. [[Dick Morris]]'s explanation&amp;amp;nbsp;— that the genius with a 174 IQ who can work a complete ''New York Times'' crossword puzzle in 15 minutes while sitting on the toilet&amp;amp;nbsp;— does not know how to type maybe true. But Clinton most definitely knows through Hillary, who was close!y involved in these matters since the mid 1980s, there is no way ever to keep emails secret. Bill Clinton is in the habit of issuing oral instructions to close aides and the use of surrogates for communication, deniability, and no paper trail.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several mysterious deaths are associated with the lawsuits the owners of Inslaw brought against the government for the theft of Inslaw's intellectual property that Hillary Clinton represented as the property of Systematics. In one case an entire family was murdered.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Larry Guerrin'''&amp;amp;nbsp;— February 1987. Investigator. Killed investigating the INSLAW case.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Alan Standorf'''&amp;amp;nbsp;— January 31, 1991. Employee of [[National Security Agency]] in electronic intelligence. Standorf was a source of information for [[Danny Casolaro]] who was investigating INSLAW, [[BCCI]], etc. Standorf's dead body was found in the backseat of a car at Washington National Airport.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Dennis Eisman'''&amp;amp;nbsp;— April 5, 1991. Attorney with information on INSLAW. Eisman was found shot to death.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Ian Spiro'''&amp;amp;nbsp;— November 1992. Informant. Spiro had supporting documentation for grand jury proceedings on the INSLAW case. '''His wife and three children''' were found murdered on November 1, 1992 in their home. They all died of gunshot wounds to the head. Ian's body was found several days later in a parked car in the Borego Desert. Cyanide poisoning.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''John Crawford'''&amp;amp;nbsp;— April 1993. Attorney with information on INSLAW. Reportedly died from a heart attack in Tacoma.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Iran-Contra ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article:'' [[Iran-Contra]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Mena Airport]] in Arkansas became the logistical point for implementation of the Iran-Contra ordeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/g_epmurfIk8 ; see also Bill Plante &amp;amp; Michael Singer, ''Still a Strong Scent on the Mena Trail'', Letter to the Editor, [[Wall Street Journal]], 5/3/94.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gross value of the illegally imported [[narcotic]]s at Mena is said to have reached $100 million per month at its height, nearly ten times its cost of delivery in trade and arms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mena airport was documented to be the biggest drug-smuggling operation in the [[United States]] importing $100 million per month in cocaine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/vKdPaQnZ1DA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is alleged that much of that money had been laundered through the [[Arkansas Development Finance Authority]] (ADFA), a bonding agency that Bill Clinton created to help small businesses get started. The video and Mara Leveritt's 1999 book, ''The Boys on the Tracks'' discussed that Bill Clinton's half-brother, Roger Clinton, and his bond dealer friend [[Dan Lasater]] had gone to prison for [[cocaine]]. Richard Garrett had stated on ''Unsolved Mysteries'', a television program which taped informational segments regarding the boys' on the tracks beginning in 1988,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://unsolved.com/archives/don-henry-kevin-ives&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Saline County and Central Arkansas were overrun with drug-trafficking at a high level that extended to other counties and other states.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even when Mena's gun-running operation was shut down after 1986, Mena continued to be used for illegal narcotics smuggling into the United States and the profits were pocketed by locals under then Governor [[Bill Clinton]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2016/08/26/the-boys-on-the-tracks-are-back&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1989 Clinton received petitions from Arkansas citizens demanding he convene a state grand jury and investigate Mena.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://bondiviewertest.azurewebsites.net/DataView/Article/HT?issueKey=19920501&amp;amp;articleKey=19920501021 Clinton Turned Blind Eye to Arkansas Contra Connections], ''High Times'', May 1992, p. 21&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Winston Bryant made Mena an issue in his successful bid for Arkansas [[Attorney General]] in 1990. A year later Bryant turned over state files involving Mena to Iran-Contra special prosecutor Lawrence Walsh, but Walsh did nothing with the reams of evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Mena airport ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article:'' [[Mena airport]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:320px-Contra commandas 1987.jpg|right|400px|thumb|The Contras. Bill, Hillary, Vince Foster, and others ran the US end of the guns-for-dope operation. Webb Hubbell and other Clinton associates ran the money laundering schemes. By 1992, [[George H.W. Bush|Bush Senior]] owed enough of a debt for their cooperation and silence, and the Clintons had enough to blackmail the Bush's with to mount a direct challenge for the presidency. The Contra operation also gave the Clintons' opportunity to expand their contacts within the US Intelligence Community. By the time it was supposedly investigated in 1987, no one asked the obvious question: ''How were the Contras funded for 4 years before any weapons were sold to Iran?''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Within the name itself, 'Iran-Contra', implies the cover-up. Mena-Contra is more aptly fitting. Just as in the 'Benghazi investigation,' which masked Obama and Hillary supply efforts to ISIS&amp;amp;nbsp;— a bipartisan effort of which Republican [[Sen. John McCain]] was [[Obama war crimes#February 2012|also involved]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/2015/09/11/exclusive-new-emails-in-benghazi-weapons-mystery.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hillary Clinton]] asked [[Vince Foster]] to help her spy on her husband in 1990. She wanted to know how vulnerable he would be in a presidential race. Foster hired Jerry Parks, an Arkansas investigator who later worked as the head of security for the Clinton/Gore campaign headquarters in [[Little Rock]]. According to Parks's widow, &amp;quot;Jerry asked Vince why he needed this stuff on Clinton. He said he needed it for Hillary.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/new-documents-prove-hillary-clinton-murder-cover/#ixzz4Nvn7BWqq&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Parks did other work for Foster. According to his wife, Parks delivered large sums of money from Mena airport to Vince Foster at a K-Mart parking lot. Mrs. Parks discovered this when she opens her car trunk one day and finds so much cash that she had to sit on the trunk to close it again. She asked her husband whether he was dealing [[drugs]], and Foster explained that he paid Parks $1,000 for each trip he took to Mena.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/clinton/arkansas.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I'M A DEAD MAN,&amp;quot; whispered Parks, as he looked up at the television screen. It was a news bulletin on the local station in Little Rock. Vincent Foster, a childhood friend of the President, had been found dead by the US Park Service outside Washington. Apparent suicide. He muttered darkly that Bill Clinton's people were &amp;quot;cleaning house,&amp;quot; and he was &amp;quot;next on the list.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Foster's death on July 20, 1993 Parks' home on Barrett Road was burglarized in a sophisticated operation that involved cutting the telephone lines and disarming the electronic alarm system. The dossier Parks had assembled at Hillary and Foster's request was stolen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two months later, in September 23, 1993, on the way back from El Chico Mexican Restaurant, at about 6:30 PM, a white Chevrolet Caprice pulled up beside him on the Chenal Parkway. An assassin let off a volley of semi-automatic fire. Parks skidded to a halt in the intersection of Highway 10. The killer jumped out and finished him off with a 9&amp;amp;nbsp;mm handgun—two more shots into the chest at point blank range. Several witnesses watched as the gunman joined his accomplice in the waiting car and sped away.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[mainstream media|national media]] ignored the story of the gangland killing of the head of security of the Clinton/Gore campaign headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Little Rock Police told asked Mrs. Parks not to talk to the press until the case was solved, and she had agreed. By the spring of 1994 she was losing faith. The original detective, Tom James, had been pulled off the case. It was becoming apparent that the eyewitness accounts of the death were being ignored by the police. Witnesses had described two assassins: hefty men, with beer bellies and broad shoulders, greyish hair, in their late forties or early fifties. Yet the police kept saying that there was only one killer in the car.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jane Parks went to visit a top official from the State Police whom she knew well from church. He told her outright that the [[murder]] was a conspiracy hatched in Hot Springs by five men who moved in the social circle of Buddy Young, the former chief of Governor Clinton's security detail and now the regional director of the [[Federal Emergency Management Agency]] (FEMA) for the south-central [[United States]]. She was given the names of the five men, and was told that they flipped coins to decide which two would carry out the execution. And finally, she was told that nothing was ever going to be done about it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20040402111006/http://terpsboy.com/Articles/JerryParks.html The Secret Life Of Bill Clinton], Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, 1997&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/ACyGsAAjfCI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/Secret-Life-Bill-Clinton-Unreported/dp/0895264080&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Ives/Henry case ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Clinton political machine and local economy had a vested interest for enrichment of themselves by continuing illegal drug smuggling after the CIA shut down the Contra supply operation and left Arkansas. On April 23, 1987, two 16-year-old boys, Kevin Ives and Don Henry, stumbled upon and witnessed an aerial drop in the area of Bauxite and Alexander, Arkansas.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.idfiles.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Initial cause of death was claimed to be the result of passing out on a railroad track in Arkansas after smoking [[marijuana]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://articles.latimes.com/1988-08-14/news/mn-623_1_preliminary-report&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The ruling was made by Arkansas' State medical examiner Dr. Fahmy Malak.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/v4yO7sdYiCI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 1988, Kevin's body was exhumed, and another autopsy was performed, this one by Atlanta medical examiner Dr. Joseph Burton who discovered that Kevin died from a crushed skull prior to being placed on the tracks. Don Henry's body was exhumed and discovered to have been stabbed in the back prior to being placed on the tracks. The deaths were indeed homicides.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arkansas State Police (ASP) files of the investigation report the area where the two boys' bodies were found was a drop zone for drugs. Another report was that on the night the boys were killed, two witnesses saw two [[police]] officers beat up two boys and throw them in the back of a police car a short distance from where the bodies were found.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20050221103949/www.geocities.com/theoctopus22/thetraindeaths.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Brown, an investigator for the Saline County Sheriffs office, reported that Sheriff Pridgen and ex-prosecutor Jean Duffey talked to a pilot in [[Texas]] who admitted being a drug pilot and remembered that he had flown drugs to points near the Saline-Pulaski county lines, precisely where the boys' bodies were found. Prosecutor Duffey concluded the cover-up was because the drugs were Mena drugs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A federal investigation was begun, but the Assistant United States Attorney, Bob Govar, reported that the FBI and DEA did not seem interested and did not furnish much help. Other reports in the state police file revealed that residents had complained about frequent low-flying planes in the area around the tracks.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:14324699 1473274228.6179 funddescription.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Kevin Ives (right) and Don Henry (left) were the best of friends. The two were murdered when they stumbled across the Clinton network's dope and gun running operation in [[Mena Arkansas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.gofundme.com/donhenry-kevinives&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Clinton body count]] originated with the Ives/Henry case and the mysterious deaths of seven witnesses, including a case the State Coroner ruled as suicide with the deceased's head found in a dumpster several blocks away.]]&lt;br /&gt;
During the Clinton administration in September 1995, agent William Temple of Clinton's FBI office in [[Little Rock]] told Linda Ives and her husband that it might be time for her to consider that a crime was not committed although the FBI had been working for two years on the case through its agent, Phyllis Coman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 1996, the documentary, ''Obstruction of Justice'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/965M_9BCYsw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was released about the investigation into the murders and Dan Harmon's activities. John Brown, a former Saline county detective on the video, made the link between drug corruption in Saline County and drug corruption at Mena which began when Russell Welch, the Arkansas State police investigator in Mena, gave him a statement made by a confidential informant in federal prison which said the boys were killed because of the drug activity they had discovered and it was connected to the drug enterprise headquartered at Mena. The video explained what was known about Barry Seal and his use of airplanes to distribute cocaine. Brown told of reports he had found in the Saline County Sheriffs office dating back to 1987 and 1988 of residents living there where the boys' bodies were found complaining of planes flying over the tracks at 100 feet above ground level with their lights out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In November 1996, Linda Ives, Kevin Ives mother, got a call from Philip Weiss who told her&lt;br /&gt;
he had been asked to prepare an article in the ''New York Times Magazine'' about people who hated Clinton. Weiss explained that Mark Fabiani, a White House lawyer, provided him with a set of news clippings about people who oppose the president and among those was a story about the &amp;quot;boys on the tracks.&amp;quot; Linda Ives called Micah Morrison, an editorial page writer for the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'', who had written an article about her earlier in the year,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/MoneyInvesting/edit/o-ed4181.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; inquiring about Phillip Weiss, and telling Morrison that Weiss talked about a packet of press clippings Weiss got from Fabiani including the article Morrison had written. Morrison then made wrote an article in the ''Wall Street Journal'', January 6, 1997, in which he broke the news that the White House was distributing to reporters packets of news clips to attack victims claiming it to be &amp;quot;conspiracy theories and innuendo.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1115427-clinton-the-communication-stream-of-conspiracy.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other deaths in the Ives/Henry case ===&lt;br /&gt;
*'''James &amp;quot;Dewey&amp;quot; Milam''' – May 30, 1987. Found decapitated. Dr. Fahmy Malak, the Coroner initially ruled death due to &amp;quot;natural causes&amp;quot; and an ulcer, claiming that the victim's small dog had eaten his head. Milam's head later was recovered fully intact from a trash bin several blocks away.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Keith Coney''' – July 1988. Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Keith McMaskle''' – November 1988. Owner of a local bar. Stabbed 113 times to death.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Gregory Collins''' – January 1989. Died from a gunshot wound.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Jeff Rhodes''' – April 1989. He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Richard Winters''' – July 1989. A suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery.&lt;br /&gt;
*'''Jordan Kettleson''' – June 1990. Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Eleanor Roosevelt and Huma Abedin ===&lt;br /&gt;
After the death of [[Vince Foster]], whom Hillary was very close to, she is said to have fallen into a deep depression and reached out to author William Stayron who wrote about his own struggles with depression.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/15/books/chapters/0715-1st-bernstein.html?pagewanted=all&amp;amp;_r=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to Bill Clinton, Hillary is a necromancer who communes with the spirits of the dead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRav-34ufcE&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1996 [[Bob Woodward]] of the ''[[The Washington Post]]'' reported Hillary Clinton consulted psychic mediums to contact the spirit of the deceased former First Lady [[Eleanor Roosevelt]] for advice.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/US/9606/22/hillary.book/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was not unprecedented, [[Mary Todd Lincoln]] held seances in the White House attempting to contact her loved ones. Hillary in many ways identified with Eleanor Roosevelt.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.newsweek.com/hillarys-other-side-178552&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eleanor Roosevelt had been caught on surveillance &amp;quot;quite clearly having sexual intercourse&amp;quot; with a younger man, [[Joe Lash]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/File:Eroose2.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The story was leaked to the press.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=cVzNFWV_rvEC&amp;amp;pg=PA304&amp;amp;lpg=PA304&amp;amp;dq=westbrook+pegler+joe+lash&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=IMvenoPmub&amp;amp;sig=ZR7pa9GcKAsAY08BolOOHWgviPk&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwiLuJzRsJDQAhXprVQKHfV2D6kQ6AEIezAT#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=westbrook%20pegler%20joe%20lash&amp;amp;f=false]. Columnist Westbrook Pegler wrote a series of articles on Mrs. Roosevelt's relations with Joe Lash.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Eleanor arranged a sham marriage between Lash and a friend of hers', [[Gertrude Pratt]], to deflect criticism and attention. Eleanor Roosevelt's [[bisexual]]ity has become the focus of biographers and scholars.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.uis.edu/lgbtqa/eleanorroosevelt/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:120726-huma-clinton.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Since 1996 the two have been together, with Abedin traveling the country as Clinton's &amp;quot;body woman.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/gallery/2013/07/how-close-are-huma-abedin-and-hillary-clinton-169489?slide=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Bill Clinton outed Hillary as a bisexual.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hollywoodlife.com/2013/09/19/hillary-clinton-bisexual-bill-clinton-gennifer-flowers-interview/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When stories of Hillary's [[lesbian]]ism abounded, Hillary held a press conference to deny the rumors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/hillary-clinton-not-lesbian-article-1.246111&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Not long after, Bill Clinton presided over an informal wedding ceremony between Hillary's longtime close associate and confidant, [[Huma Abedin]], who had been working at Hillary's side since 1994, and Rep. [[Anthony Weiner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/news/dyke-hillary-dyke-hillary-6403108&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was an odd relationship between the two; Weiner lived in New York and commuted to Washington when Congress was in session; Huma, like Hillary. spent the vast majority of time away from their spouse while Hillary and Huma travelled the globe in Hillary's role as Secretary of State.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://pamelageller.com/2015/04/hillary-lesbian-2.html/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theamericanmirror.com/hillary-huma-make-surprise-visit-nyc-pride-parade/comment-page-4/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Weiner was driven from Congress in a sexting scandal. Later it was revealed Weiner's personal computer contained more than a half million emails related to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary's email scandal. When the news broke, Hillary didn't separate herself from Huma by firing her, which Huma alone would be responsible for unauthorized State Department information being found on Anthony Weiner's personal computer. Like Nixon, she chose the path of loyalty to subordinates over making a clean break with people accused of lawbreaking, as Reagan had done when he fired [[Oliver North]] or John Kennedy when he fired [[Bay of Pigs|Allen Dulles]]. If elected, the nation faced a [[constitutional crisis]] over her actions, failures, and negligence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Scandals 1975–2001, partial list ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''For a more complete list, see [[Hillary Clinton First Lady]]'' and ''[[Iran-Contra]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;{{Cquote|&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;If [[Reaganomics]] works at all, Whitewater could become the Western hemisphere's Mecca.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;|20px|20px|Hillary Clinton in 1981 as reported by [[David Brock]] in ''The Seduction of Hillary Rodham'', p. 196.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=mhOoB-ejGIMC&amp;amp;pg=PA196&amp;amp;lpg=PA196&amp;amp;dq=If+reaganomics+eorks+whitewater+will+be+good&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=oNZfZNH1fw&amp;amp;sig=6oaim2Msj5o_HLBpme7LbdZ8v1c&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwjpy_Ok3bfPAhWr1IMKHQFzAqMQ6AEIJDAC#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=If%20reaganomics%20eorks%20whitewater%20will%20be%20good&amp;amp;f=false ''The Seduction of Hillary Rodham''], David Brock, Simon and Schuster, Feb 2, 1998, p. 196&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Only when she met Bill in 1971 did her political views flower and she became a [[Democrat]]. The Clinton marriage is fashioned upon precepts of ''The Art of the Deal''. She allowed him to chase any woman he saw fit, and he allowed her to run the [[Arkansas]] Governor's Mansion and [[White House]] as she saw fit.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-507762/Why-Hillary-Clinton-let-husband-Bill-seduce-woman-sight.html Why Hillary Clinton let husband Bill seduce any woman in sight], By SALLY BEDELL SMITH, 15 January 2008. www.dailymail.co.uk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This was the deal Bill Clinton offered America, two for the price of one.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/1992/05/18/us/1992-campaign-candidate-s-wife-hillary-clinton-aspiring-first-lady-role-model.html?pagewanted=all THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: Candidate's Wife; Hillary Clinton as Aspiring First Lady: Role Model, or a 'Hall Monitor' Type?], By MAUREEN DOWD, ''New York Times'', May 18, 1992.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Arkansas State Flag.gif|right|thumb|The Arkansas State Flag. The top star above Arkansas represents the slave holding Confederacy, an Act signed into law by Clinton.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Of the two, Hillary is the actual brains of the operation. As First Lady of Arkansas, Hillary and her law partners worked with clients looting depositors' money from Arkansas Savings and Loans, which her husband regulated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-releases-office-of-independent-counsel-oic-memoranda-laying-out-criminal-case-against-hillary-clinton-in-whitewatercastle-grande-land-scandal/ Independent Counsel Memo Laying Out Criminal Case against Hillary Clinton in Whitewater Land Scandal], JANUARY 28, 2016. www.judicialwatch.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She also pocketed large amounts of cash from complicated commodity future trading straddles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/clintons-and-wall-street-24-years-enriching-each-other The Clintons and Wall Street: 24 Years of Enriching Each Other], By Richard W. Behan / CounterPunch, February 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As the family breadwinner, Hillary mocked and ridiculed stay-at-home moms.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://time.com/4054623/clinton-dunham-tea-cookies/ This Was the Hillary Clinton Comment That Sparked Lena Dunham's Political Awareness], Denver Nicks, ''Time'', September 29, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arkansas and United States First Lady ===&lt;br /&gt;
As First Lady she holds the distinction of being the only First Lady in [[United States]] history to come under [[criminal]] investigation, both as Arkansas First Lady and in the White House. Having escaped indictment for Whitewater crimes and lying to Congress, she was the first First Lady to run and be elected to Congress while her husband was serving as President.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Travelgate (''a primer for millenials'') ===&lt;br /&gt;
As the 2016 election day approached, the elite [[mainstream media]] remained dumbfounded as to why the American people still deemed Hillary Clinton untrustworthy. The ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'' revisited one of the first scandals to hit the Clinton White House:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Under criticism the White House changed its story. They said that they were just trying to cut unneeded staff and save money. Then they said they were trying to impose a competitive bidding process. They tried a new explanation&amp;amp;nbsp;— the travel office shake-up was connected to Vice President Al Gore's National Performance Review. (Almost immediately, Mr. Gore said that was not true.) The White House then said it was connected to a campaign pledge to cut the White House staff by 25%. Finally they claimed the workers hadn't been fired at all but placed on indefinite &amp;quot;administrative leave.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Sound familiar? It's just a cough&amp;amp;nbsp;... no, it's just allergies&amp;amp;nbsp;... no, it's heat and dehydration&amp;amp;nbsp;... no, it's pneumonia&amp;amp;nbsp;...&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-17/why-dont-they-trust-her-look-one-hillary-clintons-first-ever-scandals&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|It emerged in contemporaneous notes of a high White House staffer that the travel-office workers were removed because Mrs. Clinton wanted to give their jobs—their &amp;quot;slots,&amp;quot; as she put it, according to the notes of director of administration David Watkins—to political operatives who'd worked for Mr. Clinton's campaign. And she wanted to give the travel office business itself to loyalists. There was a travel company based in Arkansas with long ties to the Clintons. There was a charter travel company founded by Harry Thomason, a longtime friend and fundraiser, which had provided services in the 1992 campaign. If the travel office were privatized and put to bid, he could get the business.}}&lt;br /&gt;
''Deja vu'' all over again&amp;amp;nbsp;...&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|'''Clinton Scandal Ritual:''' lie, deny, revise, claim not to remember specifics, stall for time. When it passes, call the story &amp;quot;old news&amp;quot; full of questions that have already been answered. 'As I've repeatedly said&amp;amp;nbsp;...'&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
For a quarter of a century the Clinton name has been synonymous with scandal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB887244288642713000&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Death of Vince Foster ===&lt;br /&gt;
Vince Foster was the highest ranking [[Executive Branch]] official killed in office since [[John F. Kennedy]]. At the time of Kennedy's murder, the killing should have been handled by the [[Dallas]] police [[homicide]] division. However federal officials and the [[Secret Service]] removed the body and flew it back to [[Washington, D.C.]], interfering with an ongoing investigation. After that botched affair, federal laws were passed making various assaults on or killing of federal officials a federal crime. The new law made the [[FBI]] the lead agency in Foster's death investigation. Various circumstances however left the job in the hands of US Park rangers, and not even the more experienced DC homicide police were involved. Most profoundly, Bill Clinton's firing of the FBI Director the day before Foster's body was discovered in a federal park, left the Bureau stunned, leaderless, and in chaos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== FBI files relating to Hillary missing from the National Archives ====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Vince-foster-murder-clinton-696x445.png|right|300px|thumb|The Vince Foster gun. The weapon used to kill Foster and the gun found at the scene, among other pertinent facts, raise inexplicable questions.]]&lt;br /&gt;
FBI files relating to Hillary's role in the [[Vince Foster]]'s death investigation are now missing from the National Archives.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3753013/Missing-FBI-files-linking-Hillary-Clinton-suicide-White-House-counsel-Vince-Foster-vanished-National-Archives.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 2016 presidential campaign, in August 2016 [[Vince Foster]] was back in the news. A [[fake news]] story was planted in the [[London]] ''Daily Mail'' alleging Foster killed himself because he had been humiliated by Hillary Clinton in a staff meeting one week before killing himself. This story sounds more plausible then the official explanation the ''Washington Post'' has cited for more than two decades&amp;amp;nbsp;— Beth Foster was depressed because he had done Hillary's tax returns,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See for example ''Washington Post'', &amp;quot;The 1993 suicide of White House counsel Vincent Foster, hard on the heels of the travel-office imbroglio and his filing of delinquent Whitewater Corp. tax returns.&amp;quot; [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/whitewater.htm Untangling Whitewater], By Dan Froomkin, Washingtonpost.com Staff.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there are problems with it. Mainly, that according to the First Lady's schedule now at the Clinton Library in Arkansas, Hillary Clinton was in [[Japan]] and the Far East more than two weeks before Foster's body was discovered. She returned to the United States on July 18, spent two days in Arkansas, and wasn't scheduled to return to Washington till after Foster's body was found. Numerous other sources corroborate her schedule.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Illegal fundraising, 1996 ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Main|Chinagate fundraising scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Chinagate was a campaign finance controversy in which the Clintons illegally took money from foreign governments and military establishments. Like the Nixon administration, however, it was impossible to get the government to investigate itself, at least to any acceptable or just conclusion before the Clintons term of office was up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Agents of China sought to give contributions to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) before the [[United States presidential election, 1996|1996 presidential campaign]] in violation of US law barring non-American citizens from donating money to American politicians and political parties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Woodward, Bob and Duffy, Brian, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/china1.htm &amp;quot;Chinese Embassy Role In Contributions Probed&amp;quot;], ''Washington Post'', February 13, 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An unclassified [[United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs|U.S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs]] report issued in 1998 stated that both James Riady and his father Mochtar &amp;quot;had a long-term relationship with a Chinese intelligence agency.&amp;quot; According to journalist [[Bob Woodward]], details of the relationship came from highly classified intelligence information supplied to the committee by both the CIA and [[Federal Bureau of Investigation]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Woodward, Bob, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/stories/cf021098.htm &amp;quot;Findings Link Clinton Allies to Chinese Intelligence&amp;quot;], ''Washington Post'', Feb. 10, 1998.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MOCTAR.JPG|right|300px|thumb|Hillary Clinton with Mochtar Riady at a fundraiser during the [[Chinagate]] scandal. Mochtar Riady, along with Bill Clinton's financial godfather Jackson Stephens, brought the [[BCCI]] to America, a front for international dope dealers and arms traffickers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=hk7XCQAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT61&amp;amp;lpg=PT61&amp;amp;dq=mochtar+riady+bcci&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=58F2SxmNWF&amp;amp;sig=ZV6dddrtUdo7dmmCfjVhgQZOuLE&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwjpwvS7mvDTAhVH9mMKHc_MC5QQ6AEINzAG#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=mochtar%20riady%20bcci&amp;amp;f=false]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The relationship between John Huang, the Riady Family, and the Clintons, goes back to the late 1970s in Little Rock, Arkansas. The patriarch of the family, Mochtar Riady, is an [[Indonesia]]n of [[Chinese]] descent who built up the Lippo Group empire. In the mid-1970s, Mochtar Riady planned to expand his business into the United States and began looking for partners. He met the Stephens family of Arkansas and entered into various joint ventures with Stephens Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Stephens family were in fact the original owners of the American branch of the notorious [[Bank of Credit and Commerce International]] (BCCI) in a joint venture with the Riady's in the late 1970s and 1980s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;mlhttps://fas.org/irp/congress/1992_rpt/bcci/06early.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was shut down in the early 1990s in an enormous worldwide criminal money laundering scandal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Little Rock the Riadys met then-Governor Bill Clinton and financially supported Clinton's gubernatorial campaigns throughout the 1980s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Riady pledged $1 million in support of then-Governor Clinton's campaign for the presidency 1992, contributions made by Huang had been reimbursed with funds wired from a foreign Lippo Group entity into an account Riady maintained at Lippo Bank and then distributed to Huang in cash. Also, contributions made by Lippo Group entities operating in the United States were reimbursed with wire transfers from foreign Lippo Group entities.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2001/January/017crm.htm &amp;quot;James Riady Pleads Guilty&amp;quot;], Department of Justice, press release, January 11, 2001.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/08/12/huang.sentence/ &amp;quot;Former Democratic fund-raiser John Huang pleads guilty&amp;quot;], ''CNN.com'', Aug. 12, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Huang visited the White House 78 times while working as a DNC fund-raiser.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/time9610.html &amp;quot;The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Timeline&amp;quot;], ''CNN.com'', July 1, 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; James Riady visited the White House 20 times including 6 personal visits with President Clinton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/gen/resources/infocus/fundraising.flap/characters.html &amp;quot;The Democratic Fund-Raising Flap: Cast of Characters&amp;quot;], ''CNN.com'', July 1, 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As a key fund-raiser he raised $3.4 million for the party.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/players/huang.htm &amp;quot;Campaign Finance Key Player: John Huang&amp;quot;], ''Washington Post'', July 27, 1997.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Immediately prior to joining the DNC, Huang worked in the Clintons' [[Commerce Department]] as deputy assistant secretary for international economic affairs giving him access to classified intelligence on China.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/US/9905/25/cox.report.highlights/ &amp;quot;Highlights of U.S. report on alleged China spying&amp;quot;], ''CNN.com'', May 25, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under questioning by Sen. Don Nickles during congressional investigations Clinton private investigator Terry Lenzner identified [[Cody Shearer]] as a liaison between Lenzner's firm, Investigative Group International, and the Cheyenne-Arapaho tribe. The tribe had donated more than $100,000 to the Democratic Party hoping that the Clinton administration would intervene on the tribes behalf in a dispute over drilling rights on tribal land. Lenzner's firm had been hired by the Clintons to discredit Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Monica Lewinsky and others, and had been retained to uncover compromising links between Sen. Don Nickles-opposed the tribe's claims—and local oil interests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Whitewater crimes ===&lt;br /&gt;
An April 10, 1998 memo in the Whitewater Office of Independent Counsel (OIC) summarized Hillary Clinton's &amp;quot;crimes under consideration&amp;quot; for [[prosecution]].&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Between January 1994 and February 1996 both Hillary Clinton and [Webster] Hubbell made numerous sworn statements to the [Resolution Trust Corporation], the FDIC, the Senate and the House of Representatives, and to the OIC. Each of these reflected and embodied materially inaccurate stories relating to: how RLF [Rose Law Firm] came to be retained by MGSL [Madison Guaranty Savings &amp;amp; Loan]; Hillary Clinton's role in the IDC/Castle Grande venture; Hillary Clinton's role in representing MGSL; Hillary Clinton's role in representing MGSL before state agencies'; Hubbell's representations to the RTC [Resolution Trust Corporation] and FDIC regarding Hillary Clinton's role in the IDC/Castle Grande venture; and the removal of records from the [Rose Law Firm].}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Chelsea Hubbell.jpg|right|375px|thumb|Webster Hubbell and Chelsea Clinton. Chelsea Clinton has become the poster child of [[white privilege]] for a generation. Webster Hubbell, an old &amp;quot;family friend,&amp;quot; gave up a lifetime appointment on the Arkansas Supreme Court to move to Washington with the Clintons and serve four years in federal prison on a fraud conviction.]]&lt;br /&gt;
According to prosecutors, Hillary drafted an option agreement that concealed from federal bank examiners a fraudulent $300,000 cross-loan in the Castle Grande transaction. Her concealment of her role in this fraudulent transaction, including the hiding of her Rose Law Firm billing records concerning her legal work for Madison, were the subject of an OIC obstruction of justice probe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The memo included substantial evidence depicting Hillary, Hubbell, and Vincent Foster, as complicit in activities that &amp;quot;facilitated crimes.&amp;quot; Hubbell was convicted of fraudulent billing practices and sentenced to twenty-one months in prison and fined $135,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/05/AR2007060500908.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The memo noted that Hillary &amp;quot;destroyed&amp;quot; her personal records of her work for Madison Guaranty. The evidence covers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|'''Castle Grande.''' &amp;quot;The Castle Grande transactions were crimes.&amp;quot; The statement is followed by an explicit six-paragraph dissection of the land-flipping scheme.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Madison Guaranty S&amp;amp;L]].''' Hillary minimized the role she played in seeking state regulatory assistance for the corrupt savings and loan, headed by key Clinton financial and political supporter [[James McDougal]]. At the time, Bill Clinton was governor of Arkansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Vincent Foster and the Missing Rose Law Firm Billing Records.''' The Rose billing records were a key piece of evidence in the probe. They were missing for years. After Foster's death, the OIC memo notes &amp;quot;evidence supports the inference that personal documents which Hillary Clinton did not want disclosed were located in Foster's office at the time of his death and then removed.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Removal of Records from Vincent Foster's Office.''' &amp;quot; [O]n the afternoon of July 21st Bernard Nussbaum, then White House Counsel, initially agreed to allow two career DOJ employees to review the documents in Foster's office for evidence that might shed light on the cause of his death. That evening and the next morning Nussbaum, Hillary Clinton, Susan Thomases, and Maggie Williams (Hillary Clinton's chief of staff) exchanged ten separate phones calls&amp;amp;nbsp;... That morning, according to the DOJ employees, Nussbaum changed his mind and refused to allow the DOJ prosecutors to review the documents; instead, he reviewed them himself and segregated several as 'personal' to the Clintons.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hiding the Billing Records.''' &amp;quot;On the evening of July 22nd, Thomas Castleton&amp;amp;nbsp;... assisted Williams [Maggie Williams, Hillary Clinton chief of staff] in carrying a box of personal documents up to&amp;amp;nbsp;... a closet in Hillary Clinton's office. The closet is approximately 30 feet from the table in the Book Room, where the billing records were found 2 years later&amp;amp;nbsp;...&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Bying the Silence of a Co-Conspirator.''' Hubbell received several &amp;quot;jobs&amp;quot; from Clinton supporters for which he apparently did little or no work. During a taped conversation in prison, Hubbell appears to acknowledge that he withheld information from the OIC. Several of Hubbell's job-providers fell most strongly within the hush money allegation.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Archives is withholding additional documents critical to understanding Clinton's full role in the Whitewater scandal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-releases-office-of-independent-counsel-oic-memoranda-laying-out-criminal-case-against-hillary-clinton-in-whitewatercastle-grande-land-scandal/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Evidence tampering and obstruction ===&lt;br /&gt;
After the death of White House staffer Vince Foster, 20 year Secret Service veteran Henry O' Neill testified before Congress he observed as Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, Margaret Williams, carry boxes of papers out of Foster's office and up to the White House residence quarters on First Lady Hillary Clinton's instructions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/clinton/etc/01301996.html Whitewater Lost and Found Records], Nightline Transcripts, January 30, 1996. npr.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The documents related to work performed by Jerry Parks, the head of security for the Clinton-Gore 1992 campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://contrariansview.org/onashisite/WebVAX/Foster/AEPonQuinn10Oct96.html Ambrose Evans-Pritchard interview], Quinn in the Morning Show, WRRK 97 FM Pittsburgh, October 10, 1996&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under [[oath]], Hillary Clinton denied issuing the instructions or receiving the documents. The documents evidence in the investigation of the death of Vince Foster. Parks was gunned down in a gangland-style shooting in Arkansas two months after Foster's death.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://prorev.com/2006/08/strange-death-of-jerry-parks-and-even.htm THE STRANGE DEATH OF JERRY PARKS AND EVEN STRANGER DEATH OF DR DAVID MILLSTEIN], ''Progressive Review'', Sam Smith, Editor, August 23, 2006&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two years later in 1995 some of the evidence was retrieved from the private White House living quarters. FBI investigators determined Hillary Clinton's fingerprints were on the documents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1996-04-30/pdf/CREC-1996-04-30-pt1-PgH4166-3.pdf#page=2 &amp;quot;Remarks by Congressman (Dan) Burton of Indiana: First Lady's fingerprints on billing records&amp;quot;] (April 30, 1996). ''Congressional Record'' (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office), House of Representatives, 104th Congress, pp. H4167-8.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CREC-1996-05-10/pdf/CREC-1996-05-10-pt1-PgH4880-3.pdf#page=1 &amp;quot;Remarks by Congressman (Dan) Burton of Indiana: Mrs. Clinton's fingerprints on billing records II&amp;quot;] (May 10, 1996). ''Congressional Record'' (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office), House of Representatives, 104th Congress, pp. H4880-1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Pay-to-play pardons ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Marc Rich]] is the biggest tax cheat in American history. Rich fled the country. He was a big donor to the Clintons and the Democratic party, so [[Bill Clinton]] wanted to pardon him. [[Eric Holder]], who later served as Barack Obama's Attorney General, arranged the pardons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/16/holder.confirmation/ Former FBI director: Holder was 'used' in Rich pardon], [[CNN]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Former President [[Jimmy Carter]] publicly called it &amp;quot;disgraceful&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/carter-rich-pardon-disgraceful/ Carter: Rich Pardon 'Disgraceful'], CBSNews.com staff AP February 21, 2001&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rich's wife then donated at least $450,000 to the [[Clinton Foundation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Attacking victims of sexual assault ==&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton communications director George Stephanopoulos writes in his memoirs of the Clinton 'War Room' about assignments to belittle and kill victim's allegations of sexual abuse. &amp;quot;We have to destroy her story,&amp;quot; Mrs. Clinton instructed of Connie Hamzy, one of the first women to come forward during her husband's first presidential campaign in 1991.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2016, Esquire magazine reported on a gathering in the fashionable Upper East Side apartment of the chief executive of HBO. Several conflicted past and present Clinton surrogates discussed how the Clintons and their allies discredited women who said they had sexual encounters with, or been [[sexual assault|sexually assaulted]] by former President Bill Clinton.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|The conversation, relayed by several people with knowledge of the discussion who would speak about it only anonymously, captures the deeper debate unfolding among [[liberal]]-leaning women about how to reconcile Mrs. Clinton's leadership on women's issues with her past involvement in her husband's efforts to fend off accusations of sexual misconduct.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a41327/new-york-times-clinton-rumors/ The New York Times Is Obsessed with 2 Things. You Already Know What They Are.], By Charles P. Pierce, ''Esquire'', Jan 20, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The conundrum these conflicted Clinton surrogates face is how to explain their own past participation in sliming and vilifying women who came forward with accusations against the President of the United States with a history of untoward, and even violent, sexual misconduct to a generation of Millennials unfamiliar with the brazen history of the pair:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Even some [[Democrat]]s who participated in the effort to discredit the women acknowledge privately that today, when Mrs. Clinton and other women have pleaded with the authorities on college campuses and in workplaces to take any allegation of sexual assault and sexual harassment seriously, such a campaign to attack the women's [[character]] would be unacceptable.}}&lt;br /&gt;
But such a public campaign of abuse and ridicule of the victim ''was'' acceptable under the Clintons, by Clinton media and [[Hollywood]] surrogates. And virtually all historical and inside eyewitness accounts, dating back to Arkansas and the White House years, point to Hillary Clinton as the source who made it a mission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Intimidation and blackmail ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|When Hillary hired this fleet of detectives to go around examining all of the woman who had been identified with Clinton. Not for the purpose of divorcing Clinton. Not for the purpose of getting him to stop, but for the purpose of developing blackmail material on these women to cow them into silence that had a [[Nixon]]ian quality that I hold against her and I continue to.|20px|20px|[[Dick Morris]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/video/2014/10/31/dick-morris-i-left-when-hillary-hired-secret-police-to-go-after-woman-victimized-by-bill/ Dick Morris: I Left When Hillary Hired Secret Police to Go After Woman Victimized by Bill], by [[Breitbart.com]], 31 Oct 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
One of the more abhorrent aspects of Hillary Clinton's personality is a well documented pattern by multiple Clinton confidants and advisors of intimidation and blackmail toward female victims of Mr. Bill Clinton's sexual misconduct. Mrs. Clinton is accredited with introducing the [[sexist]] [[pejorative]], 'bimbo', into the American political [[lexicon]] to disparage victims of sexual assault by the rich and powerful.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WiQRBN8igE Hillary Clinton calls Bill Clinton's sexual assault victims &amp;quot;Bimbo Eruptions&amp;quot;] youtube.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The politicalinsider.com identified the problem,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|One of the most incredible things about Hillary Clinton running for President is that there is an extraordinary long list of scandals that younger voters have never heard of. Just trying to keep up with the multiple decades of corruption and criminal activity of Bill and Hillary Clinton which happened long before the recent email scandal is overwhelming.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/a-woman-who-was-sexually-assaulted-by-bill-clinton-drops-a-bomb-on-hillary-whoa/ A Woman Who Was Sexually Assaulted by Bill Clinton Drops a BOMB on Hillary], thepoliticalinsider.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The ''New York Times'' noted before the 2016 [[primary election]] season began that the '''90s Scandals Threaten to Erode Hillary Clinton's Strength With Women'', and Hillary Clinton certainly was not, by any account, a victim, or a victim of her husband's faithlessness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/us/politics/90s-scandals-threaten-to-erode-hillary-clintons-strength-with-women.html '90s Scandals Threaten to Erode Hillary Clinton's Strength With Women], By AMY CHOZICK, ''New York Times'', JAN. 20, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the recent book, ''The Clinton's War on Women'', the authors cite a [[Sociology|sociological]] phenomena known as [[elite deviance]] in a society where the elites no longer believe the rules apply to them and their behavior is justified and facilitated by a cadre of [[sycophant]]s, [[apologist]]s, supporters, and surrogates collectively known as the Clinton smear machine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/the-hillary-clinton-smear-machine/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[http://greatbookcorner.com/data/thepopularbook.site/T/the-clintons-war-on-women-roger-stone--93pfuGF9wiHCc6-8BX16-8ZvB6-8AVI6d.pdf The Clinton's War on Women]'', pp. 16-17 pdf.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To locate, stalk, harass, and intimidate the women, Betsy Wright was put in charge of the operation. According to [[Carl Bernstein]], &amp;quot;Betsy's operation became known as 'The Defense Department', and Wright was sometimes known as the 'secretary of defense'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=KG8oDvWH3ZYC&amp;amp;pg=PT612&amp;amp;dq=Carl+Bernstein+betsey+wright+defense+department+clinton&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=x4RWU4edAcLjsATguYHYAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDMQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=Carl%20Bernstein%20betsey%20wright%20defense%20department%20clinton&amp;amp;f=false A Woman in Charge], Carl Bernstein, Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, Jun 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For this Jack Palladino, Terry Lenzner, Ivan Duda, Jerry Parks,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://bonedjello.com/Articles/The%20Murder%20of%20Jerry%20Parks.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Anthony Pellicano, and others were employed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wnd.com/2005/07/31278/ The real story behind the Clinton body count], ''[[WorldNetDaily]]'', 07/13/2005. Review of Richard Poe's, ''Hillary's Secret War.'' wnd.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://alamo-girl.com/02742.htm PRIVATE AND PUBLIC INVESTIGATIVE RESOURCES], SECTION: SECRET POLICE, Revised 8/10/00. http://alamo-girl.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mega.nu/ampp/foster.html Reports Tie Clinton Sexcapades to Foster's Death]. mega.nu&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Palladino was beaten to death in 2021.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To silence the women, all sorts of threats and intimidation were common, such as murdering the family pet on the doorstep or blatant threats against the lives of their children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=1v5e4lZiS08C&amp;amp;pg=PA214&amp;amp;lpg=PA214&amp;amp;dq=pellicano%2Bhillary&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=2QSRhFU8QY&amp;amp;sig=zFCzv6MqE1JDMGwraPnD1XL3TB8&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwiyuqCkgYDNAhVLz2MKHdJwA9AQ6AEI3AEwIg#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=pellicano%2Bhillary&amp;amp;f=false Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton], Kathleen Willey, WND Books, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wnd.com/2007/11/44416/ PI 'admits' Hillary paid him to harass Willey], WND, 11/07/2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Pornographer]] impresario [[Larry Flynt]] was called to boot a $1,000,000 reward to anybody to come forward with sexual innuendo, whether true or not, to attack Clinton's enemies with.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://observer.com/2000/08/its-poker-night-with-larry-flynt-porn-king-discourses-on-sex-gore/ It's Poker Night With Larry Flynt! Porn King Discourses on Sex, Gore], By Andrew Goldman, ''New York Observer'', 08/28/00&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Sexual blackmail of political opponents ====&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary's obsession with sexual blackmail isn't limited to compromising and silencing disgruntled mistresses or women Bill Clinton assaulted, it became a ready tool against political opponents as well. Hillary Rodham Clinton has an obsession with opposition research and digging up dirt on opponents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/hillary-clinton-already-knows-the-bad-thing-you-said?utm_term=.ry2yGw3Go#.of4rD4yDJ&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As Hillary's emails reveal, she often spent more time studying domestic critics views of her activities than the actual job of secretary of state. A new generation of millennials is becoming familiar with the term, &amp;quot;oppo&amp;quot;, which is the first step in blackmailing and silencing media critics or candidates for public office. The Clintons have raised it from muckraking and [[dirty tricks]] to a high art form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To political opponents and the women, Clinton surrogates routinely use the material, truth not being a factor, dug up by Hillary's investigator's to slime anyone publicly who wouldn't fall into line. A recent lawsuit filed just days after it became evident Trump was considering using the case of Joe Epstein in the election is intended to neutralize criticism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/EPlDvVwER7A&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; And the surrogates relish their jobs. Indeed, many Clinton supporters believe this is the essence of [[politics]]&amp;amp;nbsp;— slander, defamation, and demonization of living human beings&amp;amp;nbsp;— not formulation or discussion of public policy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In what perhaps may or may not be a [[Freud]]ian slip Hillary Clinton titled her last book, ''Hard Choices''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rape allegations ===&lt;br /&gt;
==== As Arkansas Attorney General ====&lt;br /&gt;
The general pattern of the Clintons being above the law is illustrated the Juanita Broadderick case from 1978.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rumors circulated about Broaddrick's allegations for many years, but she refused to speak to the media. In an interview with ''Dateline NBC,'' that aired after the impeachment trial, Broaddrick claimed she had indeed been [[rape]]d by then Arkansas [[Attorney General]] Bill Clinton.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;''Dateline NBC'': February 24, 1999. ''The Washington Post'' [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/broaddrick022599.htm published a story about the interview] on February 25, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The abuse put Broadderick in a quandry: who could she turn for help in a case against the state's highest ranking [[law enforcement]] official?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broaddrick first met Clinton when he made a visit to her nursing home during his first gubernatorial bid. Broaddrick offered to volunteer for the campaign, and Clinton invited her to stop by the campaign office in Little Rock.&amp;lt;ref name=NYT&amp;gt;''New York Times'': [https://www.nytimes.com/1999/02/24/us/on-tortuous-route-sexual-assault-accusation-against-clinton-resurfaces.html On Tortuous Route, Sexual Assault Accusation Against Clinton Resurfaces]. February 24, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She contacted the office a few weeks later when she was in Little Rock for a nursing home conference. Clinton said he would not be in the office that day and suggested they meet at her hotel's coffee shop instead. Upon his arrival, however, he allegedly requested that they instead have coffee in her room to avoid a crowd of reporters in the lobby. Broaddrick agreed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broaddrick says the two spoke briefly in her room, then Clinton suddenly kissed her.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Broaddrick pushed Clinton away and told him she was married and not interested, but he persisted. As recounted in the NBC interview:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|&amp;quot;Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip&amp;amp;nbsp;... He starts to bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him 'No,' that I didn't want this to happen but he wouldn't listen to me. ...&amp;amp;nbsp;It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to 'Please stop.' And that's when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip. ...&amp;amp;nbsp;When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says 'You better get some ice on that.' And he turned and went out the door.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
When asked if there was any way Clinton could have thought it was consensual, Broaddrick said &amp;quot;No, not with what I told him and with how I tried to push him away. It was not consensual.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broaddrick shared the hotel room with her friend and employee Norma Rodgers. Rodgers attended a conference seminar that morning, and says she returned to their room to find Broaddrick on the bed &amp;quot;in a state of shock,&amp;quot; her pantyhose torn in the crotch and her lip swollen as though she had been hit.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NYT&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Rogers says Broaddrick told her Clinton had &amp;quot;forced himself on her.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NYT&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Rogers helped Broaddrick ice her lip, and then the women left Little Rock. Rogers said that Broaddrick was very upset on the way home and blamed herself for letting Clinton in the room.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broaddrick says she did not tell her then-husband about the incident.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=Slate&amp;gt;[http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/1999/03/is_juanita_broaddrick_telling_the_truth.html &amp;quot;Is Juanita Broaddrick Telling the Truth?&amp;quot;]. ''Slate'' (magazine)''. March 3, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the time, she was having an affair with her eventual second husband, David Broaddrick. He remembers her injured lip, and she told him that Clinton had raped her.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Three other friends confirmed that Broaddrick had told them about the incident at the time: Susan Lewis, Louis Ma, and Jean Darden, Norma Rogers' sister.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Broaddrick recalled incident occurred in the spring of 1978 and that she had stayed in the Camelot Hotel. Records show Broaddrick attended a nursing home meeting at the Camelot Hotel in Little Rock on April 25, 1978.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Slate&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; The Clinton White House would not respond to requests for Clinton's official schedule for the date,&amp;lt;ref name=WashingtonPost-Feb25-1999 /&amp;gt; but news reports suggest that he was in Little Rock that day, with no official commitments in the morning.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three weeks later Broaddrick attended an event where the Clintons would be in attendance at the home of a local dentist.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Broaddrick said she was &amp;quot;in denial,&amp;quot; and felt guilty, thinking that she had given Clinton the wrong idea by letting him into her room.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; When she arrived she says, her friend who had picked the Clintons up from the airport told her that Hillary Clinton had asked if she would be at the event.&amp;lt;ref name=FOXinterview&amp;gt;''FOX News'': Interview with Sean Hannity. June 10, 2003. [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KZ8ICvutc0 Excerpt] available via YouTube.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Broaddrick says Clinton did not speak to her at the event, but his wife Hillary approached her, took her hand, and said 'I just want you to know how much Bill and I appreciate what you do for him.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FOXinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; When Broaddrick moved her hand away, she says, Mrs. Clinton held on to her and said, &amp;quot;Do you understand? Everything that you do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FOXinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Broaddrick says she felt [[nausea]]ted and left the gathering. Broaddrick says she interpreted the incident as Mrs. Clinton thanking her for keeping quiet.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FOXinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, Broaddrick's nursing facility was adjudged the best in the state, which brought a congratulatory official letter from the governor. On the bottom was a handwritten note from Clinton, saying, &amp;quot;I admire you very much.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=WSJ&amp;gt;''Wall Street Journal'': [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB919379691540145000.html Juanita Broaddrick Meets the Press]. February 19, 1999.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Broaddrick said that in 1991, Clinton called her out of a state nursing standards meeting to try to apologize. In response to his apologies, as she told ''[[The Washington Post]]'', &amp;quot;I told him to go to hell, and I walked off&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=WashingtonPost-Feb25-1999&amp;gt;Kurtz, Howard (February 25, 1999). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/broaddrick022599.htm &amp;quot;Clinton Accuser's Story Aired&amp;quot;]. ''[[The Washington Post]]''. p. A15.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Darden also attended the meeting, and said she saw Broaddrick talking to Clinton in the hallway.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;NBCinterview&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lisa Myers if NBC, who conducted the ''Dateline'' interview, added she had no reason to doubt the veracity of Broadderick's accusations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== As Rhodes Scholar ====&lt;br /&gt;
An instance of media coverup, or failing to ask the right questions while promoting the Clintons and their careers is illustrated in Clinton's time at Oxford University.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The earliest known incident of a reported rape is from 1969 while at Oxford in England on the&lt;br /&gt;
[[Rhodes Scholar]]ship program. As is common knowledge, women's rights, [[prosecution]] of offenders, and protection for rape victims in 1969 were not what they are today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prestigious Rhodes Scholarship is an elite program intended to cement Anglo-American relations and train tomorrows world leaders. Clinton was recommended for the program in 1968 by his Georgetown Professor Carol Quigley and his political mentor, the notorious [[segregation]]ist Senator J. William Fulbright. It's a two-year program. Clinton received a draft deferment from conscription into the US Army during the Vietnam war for his enrollment in the program. It has been stated that 99% of all Rhodes Scholars graduate, the only cause of failing to graduate being death. Dropping out, or being thrown out, is/was virtually unheard of.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Eileen Wellstone is an English woman who came forward saying Clinton raped her in 1969 after she had met him at a pub near the University. A retired State Department employee confirmed that he spoke with the family. The employee said he believed the story of Miss Wellstone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20070516192906/http:/chblue.com/Feb1999/022599/clintonwomen022599.htm]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;There was no doubt in my mind that this young woman had suffered severe emotional trauma, But we were under tremendous pressure to avoid the embarrassment of having a Rhodes Scholar charged with rape.&amp;quot; The State Department official who investigated the incident said Clinton's interests appeared to be drinking, drugs and sex, not studies. &amp;quot;I came away from the incident with the clear impression that this was a young man who was there to party, not study.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://albertpeia.com/oxfordassault.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The victim's family declined to pursue the case; Wellstone re-confirmed the incident in 1999, but asked to be left alone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/jun/24/20040624-121742-7463r/?page=all |title=The missing Clinton women|author=The Washington Times | publisher= Washington Times |date= June 24, 2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his book, ''Unlimited Access'', former FBI agent [[Gary Aldrich]] reported that Clinton left Oxford University for a &amp;quot;European Tour&amp;quot; in 1969 and was told by University officials that he was no longer welcome there. Aldrich said Clinton's academic record at Oxford was lackluster.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having been thrown out of Oxford, Clinton lost his draft deferment. Clinton entered Oxford in October 1968, according to David Maraniss, and received a draft induction in late July 1969. Yet the focus of news reporting in the [[United States presidential election, 1992|1992 presidential election]] was on championing Clinton as a 'Rhodes Scholar' while never asking how it was possible for a Rhodes Scholar with a draft deferment to receive a draft notice. The issue focused on his failure to report for induction rather than the fact that he ''was not'' a Rhodes Scholar, that he had been thrown out of Oxford, or the reason for being thrown out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Other assaults ====&lt;br /&gt;
Most cited by name in this section of assault victims are of women who have spoken about the crimes they've suffered, although some have been intimidated into silence after going public. Others remain fearful to come forward.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1972, a twenty-two-year-old woman told Yale University's campus police that she was sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton, and although no charges were filed, a retired policeman confirmed the incident to ''Capitol Hill Blue''. The woman herself was also tracked down and confirmed it, though she elected to stay anonymous.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1974 a female student at the University of Arkansas complained that then law school instructor Bill Clinton tried to prevent her from leaving his office during a conference, groping her and forcing his hand inside her blouse. Although she complained to her faculty advisor, who confronted Clinton, the complaint again failed to go anywhere. The student left the school shortly after the incident, and more recently confirmed the incident. Several former students also confirmed the incident in confidential interviews and also said there were other reports of Clinton attempting to force himself on female students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Arkansas state troopers assigned to protect Clinton have knowledge of at least seven other complaints from women who said Clinton forced himself on them sexually or attempted to do so.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.shwiggie.com/articles/clintons.html Living with the Clintons, Bill's Arkansas bodyguards tell the story the press missed], By David Brock, 1993&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Little Rock legal secretary named Carolyn Moffet claimed that in 1979, she met the governor at a political fundraiser and shortly afterward received an invitation to meet him in a hotel room. She was escorted there by a state trooper. When she arrived he was sitting on a couch wearing an undershirt and nothing else, and angrily assaulted her. She was able to escape before being raped. Moffet received threatening phone calls. &amp;quot;He said that people who crossed the governor usually regretted it and that if I knew what was good for me I'd forget that it ever happened&amp;amp;nbsp;... I haven't forgotten it. You don't forget crude men like that.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2014/12/15/why-hillary-is-not-inevitable-bills-sordid-past/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Elizabeth Ward Gracen, a former Miss Arkansas who won the Miss America crown in 1982 told friends she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him shortly after she won her state crown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.villagevoice.com/news/the-trashing-of-clintons-women-6422690&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Clinton media surrogates publicly hype and boast of Clinton's manliness and ''machismo'' for his sexual conquest if Miss America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An Arkansas state employee named Paula Corbin filed a sexual harassment case against Clinton after she said the governor exposed himself and demanded sex in a Little Rock hotel room. President Clinton finally settled the case with Paula Corbin in 1998 with an $850,000 cash payment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
https://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/11/18/jones/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sandra Allen James, a former Washington, DC, political fundraiser said Clinton invited her to his hotel room when he was in Washington in 1991, pinned her against the wall and stuck his hand up her dress. She says she screamed loud enough for the Arkansas state trooper stationed outside the hotel suite to bang on the door and ask if everything was alright. Then, she said, Clinton released her and she fled the room. When she reported the incident to her boss, he advised her to keep her mouth shut if she wanted to keep working. ''My husband and children deserve better than that..I wasn't raped, but I was trapped in a hotel room for a brief moment by a boorish man&amp;amp;nbsp;... I got away. He tried calling me several times after that, but I didn't take his phone calls. Then he stopped. I guess he moved on.&amp;quot; She said she learned other women had similar stories during Clinton's 1992 presidential run. She has since married and left Washington and retreated from public view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://m.digitaljournal.com/article/255828&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christy Zercher, a flight attendant on Clinton's campaign plane in 1992, reported that he exposed himself to her, groped her, and made explicit sexual remarks. A video filmed on board the plane by [[ABC News]] showed an obviously drunken Clinton with his hand on intimate parts of another young flight attendant. Zercher said later in an interview that White House attorney Bruce Lindsey tried to pressure her into not going public about the assault.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://redalertpolitics.com/2015/12/29/millennials-guide-bill-clintons-20-sex-scandals/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kathleen Willey was a volunteer at the White House when Clinton grabbed her, fondled her, and pressed her hand against himself during an Oval Office meeting in November, 1993. Willey, who told her story in a [[60 Minutes]] interview, became a target of a White House–directed smear campaign after she went public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.amazon.com/Target-Caught-Crosshairs-Hillary-Clinton/dp/0974670162 Target: Caught in the Crosshairs of Bill and Hillary Clinton], Kathleen Willey, World Ahead Publishing, Nov 6, 2007 ISBN 978-0974670164 ISBN 0974670162&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1998, just before Willey was to testify in the Paula Jones trial, Willey had a disturbing encounter where she was approached by a jogger near her home. The complete stranger asked her menacing questions about her children, naming them by name. According to Willey, &amp;quot;I'll never forget that look in his eyes&amp;amp;nbsp;... He just looked at me and he said, 'You're just not getting the message, are you?'&amp;quot; On Hardball in 1999, [[MSNBC]] host [[Chris Matthews]] identified the mysterious jogger as [[Cody Shearer]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.weeklystandard.com/the-other-secret-dossier/article/2011477&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The other encounters were confirmed with more than 30 interviews with retired Arkansas state employees, former state troopers and former Yale and University of Arkansas students. Like others, they refused to go public because of fears of retaliation from the Clinton White House and smesr machine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Peter Baker in ''The Breach: Inside the Impeachment and Trial of William Jefferson Clinton'', which the ''Washington Post'' describes as the definitive account of the impeachment saga, reported that in the files of the independent prosecutor lawyers had collected the names of 21 different women. Baker noted&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|&amp;quot;One woman was alleged to have been asked by Clinton to give him oral sex in a car while he was the state attorney general (a claim she denied). A former Arkansas state employee said that during a presentation, then-Governor Clinton walked behind her and rubbed his pelvis up against her repeatedly. A woman identified as a third cousin of Clinton's supposedly told her drug counselor during treatment in Arkansas that she was abused by Clinton when she was baby-sitting at the Governor's Mansion in Little Rock.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.amazon.com/The-Breach-Inside-Impeachment-William/dp/1476730075 The Breach: Inside the Impeachment and Trial of William Jefferson Clinton], Peter Backer, December 4, 2012, p. 138&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 21, 2014, columnist Joan Vennochi of the ''a [[The Boston Globe]]'' wrote, &amp;quot;Rape allegations hurt Bill Cosby but sail past Bill Clinton.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Power—who has it, who doesn't, and how it can for years insulate the holder of it—is the common thread between Cosby, Clinton, and their accusers,&amp;quot; Vennochi wrote. Clinton apologists, surrogates, sycophants, and spin-meisters srgur their public policies are more important than his private failings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Meanwhile, the Clinton spin machine did its best to portray his accusers as 'nuts or sluts,'&amp;amp;nbsp;... against women who dare to hold men accountable for their actions,&amp;quot; Vennochi wrote.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/11/21/rape-allegations-hurt-bill-cosby-but-sail-past-bill-clinton/YTIsUoXS2uxrW1mW2JSuRM/story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Defends a pedophile ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Epstein-bill-clinton-1200x630.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Bill Clinton with Clinton Foundation co-founder Jeffrey Epstein.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The next job after the Children's Defense Fund the self described 'defender of children' handled was the case of a 41-year-old man who raped a 12-year-old girl. The rapist, facing 30 years to life in prison, Hillary plea bargained down to time served&amp;amp;nbsp;— two months in county jail&amp;amp;nbsp;— by attacking the victim who was to young to testify in a court of law to defend herself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://freebeacon.com/politics/audio-hillary-clinton-speaks-of-defense-of-child-rapist-in-newly-unearthed-tapes/ AUDIO: Hillary Clinton Speaks of Defense of Child Rapist in Newly Unearthed Tapes], Washington Free Beacon Staff, June 15, 2014. freebeacon.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In court documents Hillary wrote to the judge about the young victim as:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing&amp;amp;nbsp;... children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences and that adolescents in disorganized families, such as the complainant's, are even more prone to exaggerate behavior.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.intellihub.com/video-hillary-clinton-brags-getting-pedophile-off-hook/ Video: Hillary Clinton brags about getting a pedophile off the hook], By Brandon Turbeville, January 25, 2016. www.intellihub.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006 the victim, now an adult heard for the first time Hillary Clinton laughing about her victory in the case. The victim spoke out,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Hillary Clinton took me through hell. ...&amp;amp;nbsp;You took a case of mine in '75, you lied on me&amp;amp;nbsp;... I realize the truth now, the heart of what you've done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing. ...&amp;amp;nbsp;she lied like a dog on me. I think she was trying to do whatever she could do to make herself look good&amp;amp;nbsp;...&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html She Lied: 'Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell,' Rape Victim Says], Josh Rogan, ''The Daily Beast'', 06.20.14.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mrs. Clinton knew the child rapist to be guilty, and joked about it. Clinton mainstream surrogates, apologists, and sycophants [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/spin%20control spin] the episode to prove how 'tough minded', 'dedicated, and 'fair' she is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014 Hillary Clinton again lied about the case claiming she asked to be relieved.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2014/jul/17/did-hillary-clinton-ask-be-relieved-rapist/ Politifact: Did Hillary Clinton ask to be 'relieved' from representing an accused rapist in 1970s?], By Steve Contorno, July 17th, 2014. politifact.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Jeffrey Epstein ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Epstein Mardi Gras.PNG|right|350px|thumb|The 'Epstein didn't kill himself' [[Mardi Gras]] float depicting Hillary Clinton with a noose around Jeffrey Epstein's neck.]]&lt;br /&gt;
When the Clintons left the White House in 2001, Bill became a friend and business associate with a character known in the media as 'the billionaire pervert'. His new friend is involved in a child sex trafficking ring. He is a registered sex offender for sex crimes involving children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.forbes.com/sites/clareoconnor/2011/02/28/jeffrey-epstein-sex-offender-yes-billionaire-no/#669f83922136&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton's [[pedophile]] friend and associate, [[Jeffrey 'Joe' Epstein]], is a donor to the [[Clinton Foundation]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/07/06/billionaire-sex-offender-epstein-once-claimed-co-founded-clinton-foundation.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He began making donations shortly after his arrest on child sex charges. Epstein received a relatively light sentence in view of the charges against him.[[Joe Epstein]] settled lawsuits with 33 of his child victims. Other suits are still pending.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html#ixzz3NysnRS27&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Epstein is said to have provided minor girls for Prince Andrew. When the Palm Beach Florida police seized Epstein's contact book,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/bill-clinton/bill-clinton-and-jeffrey-epstein-9086711&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; 21 different phone numbers and email addresses for Clinton machine operatives were discovered, including the personal cell number for Bill Clinton, and numbers for Bill's flunky Doug Band and Hillary's flunky Cheryl Mills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2015/03/27/cheryl-mills-the-woman-who-knew-too-much/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Epstein owns property in Manhattan, Palm Beach and the Virgin Islands where the child molestation acts are said to have taken place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nypost.com/2011/02/25/billionaire-jeffrey-epstein-im-a-sex-offender-not-a-predator/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Seized flight logs in the investigation reveal Clinton flew on Epstein's private plane 18 times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/05/18/morning_joe_panel_clintons_connection_to_billionaire_pedophile_jeffrey_epstein_will_blow_up_campaign.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It has been established some of these flights were to Epstein's Virgin Islands retreat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2015/07/judge-unseals-more-details-in-jeffrey-epstein-underage-sex-lawsuit-210065&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A woman who victims name as procurring underage girls is s donor to the Hiilary Clinton Presidential campaign and attended Chelsea Clinton's wedding in 2010.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://snn.bz/clinton-4ss/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007 former Whitewater prosecutor [[Ken Starr]], whom critics accuse of whitewashing the Vince Foster investigation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prorev.com/knowl2a.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; defended Epstein from a second conviction of having sex with a 14 year old minor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.justice-integrity.org/faq/791-ken-starr-explains-his-help-for-billionaire-pervert-jeffrey-epstein&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Starr was forced out of his position as president of Baylor University in May 2016 for mishandling another sex scandal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Racism ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also [[Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential campaign]]'' and ''[[Bill and Hillary Clinton and racism]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Bill and Hillary Clinton are known for there cynical manipulation of Black voters and pandering to &amp;quot;white working class, hard-working white&amp;quot; nativist sentiment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/vjoMcqMTMfw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/ijhL3-5sr18&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Reminiscent of her famous &amp;quot;bring them to heel&amp;quot; speech, while discussing police shootings [[Hillary Clinton]] said, &amp;quot;We have got to rein in what is absolutely inexplicable&amp;quot; without bothering to explain what is inexplicable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary's racism runs deep. The night [[Bill Clinton]] lost his bid for a Congressional seat in 1974 and disappointing their immediate personel ambitions, Hillary blamed the loss on campaign manager Paul Fray. &amp;quot;She called me everything but a white man,&amp;quot; Fray explained to the [[BBC]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/_VonG4TyTWw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Tensions escalated. Then she called him a &amp;quot;F***ing [[Jew]] bastard.&amp;quot; The Cinton's of course deny it but five separate surviving witnesses corroborate each other in detail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2016/07/05/three-eyewitnesses-allege-hillary-called-aide-a-fking-jew-bastard/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Did Hillary commit a hate crime&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200007/ai_n8910772 Did Hillary commit a hate crime?], Human Events, July 28, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The incident was first reported in a book published by Harper Collins in 2000 entitled, ''State of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton''.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Did Hillary commit a hate crime&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/State-Union-Complex-Marriage-Hillary/dp/0060193921&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/US_election_race/Story/0,,344475,00.html Hillary faces voters' wrath for alleged ethnic slur], Michael Ellison, London Guardian, July 18, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.sobran.com/columns/1999-2001/000718.shtml Hillary's Manners], Joseph Sobran, July 18, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=15015 I agree with Clinton!], Joseph Farah, WorldNetDaily, July 20, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The New Jim Crow ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|The New Jim Crow}}&lt;br /&gt;
Under the Clintons, more the 250,000 [[African American]]s were imprisoned in the [[United States]] than under President Reagan,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.blackelectorate.com/articles.asp?ID=320&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a fact for which she takes credit for.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thenation.com/article/hillary-clinton-does-not-deserve-black-peoples-votes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Cumulatively, since Clinton signed the [[Biden Crime Bill]], 2.5 million adult black males—more than 10% of the population—have been incarcerated leaving untold damage on black families.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.prisonpolicy.org/research/incarceration_rates_growth_causes/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary's divisiveness and hate is targeted at a diverse group of people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/yu9OH_KfPXA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hillary has publicly advocated treating minority youth like dogs,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsSDqbot-EI Hillary Clinton on &amp;quot;Superpredators&amp;quot;], Mrs. Clinton Campaign Speech Keene State University, January 25, 1996. youtube.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has made mocking and offensive comments about [[Jews]] and retarded children, and has called common American [[citizen]]s deplorables.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/09/12/clinton-and-doeplorables-her-comments-about-trump-voters-her-fellow-americans-show-why-she&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These sentiments have been confirmed by Hillary's campaign chair, Mr. John Podesta, and her campaign manager, [[Robby Mook]]. According to all major, reputable sources, [[Hillary Clinton]] and/or her organization and its surrogates started the [[birther movement]] to discredit Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/bifsEkjTAc8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Her declining health and criminal investigation became an issue in her 2016 presidential campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://youtu.be/Zr1IDQ2V1eM Hillary Clinton's Illness Revealed], Dr. Ted Noel, VidZette.com, Aug. 29, 2016. youtube.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Jesse Jackson ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Clintons call [[Jesse Jackson]] that &amp;quot;Goddamn n****r&amp;quot; behind his back.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://polidics.com/news/hillary-clintons-jew-bastard.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rapmusic.com/threads/hillary-clinton-hates-blacks-and-jews-caught-by-the-secret-service-and-endorsers.1074368/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emptysuit.wordpress.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://emptysuit.wordpress.com/2010/08/02/the-clintons-jews-and-niggers-warning-graphic-language/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theblaze.com/contributions/racial-slurs-are-unsettling-if-used-by-celebrity-chefs-or-top-democrats/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jackson refused to release his delegates in 1984 to [[Gary Hart]], Clinton's old boss from the [[McGovern]] campaign of 1972. Jackson, the first African-American to win states in a major party primary, questioned the disparity between his vote total and delegate count, but even Hart sided with the DNC's rigging the primary rules.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/1984/05/20/us/disparity-between-jackson-s-vote-and-delegate-count-vexes-party.html?pagewanted=all DISPARITY BETWEEN JACKSON'S VOTE AND DELEGATE COUNT VEXES PARTY], By DAVID E. ROSENBAUM, ''New York Times'', May 20, 1984.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1988 Jackson selected Ron Brown as his chief negotiator at the 1988 Democratic National Convention.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://socialistworker.org/2016/07/25/how-democrats-got-over-the-rainbow&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Brown went on to serve as DNC Chairman and Commerce Secretary until he died in a plane crash.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/Ron-Browns-Body-Presidency-Hillarys/dp/0785262377&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Democratic Leadership Council ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Democratic Leadership Council}}&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) was a racist organization formed by remnants of the McGovern and Hart campaigns&amp;amp;nbsp;— less the [[Rainbow Coalition]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.blackcommentator.com/46/46_cover.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://ofamerica.wordpress.com/tag/democratic-leadership-council/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 1992 it had taken over the DNC. Democratic strategists sought to distance themselves from the civil rights movement and begin pushing the &amp;quot;centrist&amp;quot; candidacy of Bill Clinton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.salon.com/2016/01/31/the_clintons_sordid_race_game_no_one_will_say_it_but_the_clintons_rise_was_premised_on_repudiating_black_voters/ The Clintons' sordid race game: No one will say it, but the Clintons' rise was premised on repudiating black voters], Corey Robin, ''Salon'', Jan 31, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That fact that 30-year-old allegations of sexual assault and improprieties are hurled at [[Bill Cosby]] with a devastating effect on his life and career while Bill Clinton is held up as a paragon of manhood and public service by the media and judicial system is a testament of the bigotry and racism of the mainstream media and their supporters. Rumors persist that the Clintons have effectively blackmailed Barack Obama to drop the email investigation and for his active support in the 2016 presidential campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/07/media-gets-facts-wrong-on-loretta-lynchbill-clinton-tarmac-meeting/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Voting rights violations ===&lt;br /&gt;
In Arkansas, the Clinton administration was sued several times by blacks and [[Hispanic]]s for violations of the 1965 [[Voting Rights Act]] and lost every case. 10 years into their grip on Arkansas the [[United States Supreme Court]] ruled&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|violations of the [[Fourteenth amendment|fourteenth]] or [[fifteenth amendment]] justifying equitable relief have occurred in Arkansas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 1990, the district court turned to those claims, holding that &amp;quot;the State of Arkansas has committed a number of constitutional violations of the voting rights of black citizens.&amp;quot; In particular, the court determined that the &amp;quot;State has systematically and deliberately enacted new majority-vote requirements for municipal offices, in an effort to frustrate black political success in elections traditionally requiring only a plurality to win.&amp;quot; In 1990&amp;amp;nbsp;... Devotion to majority rule for local offices lay dormant as long as the [[plurality]] system produced white office-holders. But whenever black candidates used this system successfully -- and victory by a plurality has been virtually their only chance of success in at-large elections in majority-white cities – the response was swift and certain. Laws were passed in an attempt to close off this avenue of black political victory&amp;amp;nbsp;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This series of laws represents a systematic and deliberate attempt to reduce black political opportunity. Such an attempt is plainly unconstitutional. It replaces a system in which blacks could and did succeed, with one in which they almost certainly cannot. The inference of [[bigotry|racial motivation]] is inescapable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Findings of the Supreme Court of the United States in [http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/1990/sg900402.txt Clinton vs Jeffers] No. 90-394 (1990) on appeal 730 F. Supp. 196, 198-201 (ED Ark. 1989) (three-judge court), aff'd, No. 89-2008 (Jan. 7, 1991).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://commonsensewonder.blogspot.com/2016/09/bill-clintons-comment-about-trumps-make.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In more than one thousand legislative elections, the Arkansas delta region sent not one black to the legislature. In 1988 the federal district court forced a change to the system in Crittenden County that watered down the presence of a large number of black voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The case began when blacks in Crittenden County filed a voting rights lawsuit attacking the county's ''at-large'' system for electing two members to the Arkansas House. The suit contended that the system deprived black voters of a chance to elect a black to the state assembly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The evidence at trial was indeed overwhelming that the Voting Rights Act had been violated. Plaintiffs offered plenty of proof of monolithic voting along racial lines, intimidation of black voters and candidates, other official acts that made voting harder for blacks. A panel of 3 judges ordered Clinton, the Attorney General, and Secretary of State to redraw the boundaries to give maximum strength to black voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Local press reports in Arkansas from the late 1980s paint an ugly picture of the [[Clinton administration]]'s attempts to intimidate black voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readreplies.aspx?subjectid=28880&amp;amp;msgid=18476315&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In her 1998 memoir ''Lift Every Voice'', former [[U.S Justice Department]] Civil Rights Division nominee Lani Guinier revealed that Clinton's record on [[race]] in Arkansas was so bad she was forced to take legal action. &amp;quot;As a staff lawyer for the [[NAACP]] Legal Defense and Education Fund [LDF], I had sued Gov. Clinton over Arkansas's deputy voter registration statute.&amp;quot; A deputy voter registrar is someone authorized to register voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guinier wrote, &amp;quot;In the late 1980s, in a particularly tense meeting in southeastern Arkansas&amp;amp;nbsp;— a section of the Mississippi Delta region where antebellum social relations are still in many respects the order of the day,&amp;quot; Dayna Cunningham, a civil rights lawyer, &amp;quot;were one of a handful of black people there to discuss remedies for a highly contentious LDF voting rights suit. The meeting turned sour when one of the local whites demanded to know why, in his view, the whites were always made to pay for others' problems. Other whites in the group began to echo his charge&amp;amp;nbsp;... Bill Clinton, the lead defendant in the case, took to the podium to respond. In a tone of resignation, Clinton said, 'We have to pay because we lost,'&amp;quot; the inference being the loss of the [[Civil War]] as well as the Clintons loss in the Supreme Court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Clinton had irresponsibly pandered to the backwards feeling of the white constituency,&amp;quot; said Cunningham.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No good deed goes unpunished of course, so Guinier was not without her own problems for having unfortunately crossed paths with the Clintons, beginning at Yale. Three years after the ruckus in Arkansas President Clinton nominated her as Deputy Attorney General for Civil Rights. But the Clinton surrogates were lying in wait for her. A media smear campaign not only distorted her views, but in many cases presented them as the exact opposite. The ''New York Times'', which ordinarily presents the Clintons as the wonders of an age, ran an op-ed highly critical of Clinton's appointment, alleging Guinier was in favor of &amp;quot;[[segregation|segregating]] black voters in black-majority districts.&amp;quot; The ''Washington Post'', again no friend of conservatives, twisted Guiniers advocacy of proportional representation into a vision of &amp;quot;a society in which a minority can impose its will on the majority.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting says of the ambush and firestorm that surrounded Guinier's nomination:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|there was also an ideological agenda at work: promoting Clinton's media-celebrated shift &amp;quot;back to the center.&amp;quot; ...&amp;amp;nbsp;To make her a proper sacrificial offering, however, the establishment media had to reinvent Guinier&amp;amp;nbsp;— transforming a sophisticated advocate of racial reconciliation and participatory democracy into a sinister, [[race baiting|race-baiting]] enemy of the American Way.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://fair.org/extra/lani-guinier/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrats held both Houses of Congress and the presidency. Guinier's nomination, if the Clintons were serious about it should have been easy. She had been Hillary snd Bill's classmate at Yale. It was classic ''Clintonism'': destroying the life of a friend and who was an advocate of racial reconciliation, painting the American people as racist, and promoting themselves. [[George Will]], it has been said, was too stupid and too lazy to actually read her writtings. As [[Mike Klonsky]] noted, when the liberal lions of the Democratically controlled Senate, such as [[Ted Kennedy]] and even [[Carole Moseley Braun]] stepped away, now the Clintons could turn a message of reconciliation into repudiation in front of the whole nation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What's a little misunderstanding among friends? Guinier said she felt betrayed by Clinton, whom she considered a friend since their days together at Yale Law School, and was angered when he called her &amp;quot;anti-democratic,&amp;quot;&amp;amp;nbsp;— the person who protected voting rights of African-Americans despite Clinton's fight against it&amp;amp;nbsp;— in a nationally televised address announcing he was scuttling her nomination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.c-span.org/video/?42098-1/assistant-attorney-general-nomination&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rep. Ben McGee ===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1988 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Clinton wrongfully tried to overturn the election of a black state representative, Mr. Ben McGee, and replace him with a white Democrat Clinton handpicked. The case grew out of the suit against Clinton to win voting rights for the people of Crittenden County.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Robert 'Say' MacIntosh ===&lt;br /&gt;
Robert 'Say' MacIntosh is a civil rights activist who the ''Arkansas Democrat'' newspaper named Arkansan of the Year in the late 1970s for his charitable work with children in Little Rock's housing projects.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20080926012344/http://www.cals.lib.ar.us/butlercenter/manuscripts/collection/mss97-43.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; MacIntosh unsuccessfully ran for public office under Arkansas's racial gerrymanderring and minority [[voter suppression]] laws of the Clinton era, including as Lieutenant Governor in 1980. He considered challenging Bill Clinton in the 1986 Democratic gubernatorial primary, but backed out when another African-American candidate, former anti-poverty agency head W. Dean Goldsby, filed on the last day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A tree was ceremoniously planted on the Arkansas capitol grounds in the Clinton years on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day to honor Dr. King. McIntosh showed up the next day and chopped it down in front of the press, and commented, &amp;quot;No black man was invited to be present for the tree planting. I'm cutting it down till blacks are invited to be part of the political process in Little Rock.&amp;quot; Wikipedia says &amp;quot;few debate that he has been a major part of local color in Arkansas.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_&amp;quot;Say&amp;quot;_McIntosh&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MacIntosh publicized allegations Bill Clinton fathered an out of wedlock child named Danney Williams.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/danney_williams?s=09&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Bill Clinton was in Little Rock, McIntosh would distribute leaflets within a five block area to raise money for the child's upbringing. He had frequent face-to-face confrontations with Gov. Clinton over child support. Clinton privately referred to MacIntosh with aides using the &amp;quot;n&amp;quot; word.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;emptysuit.wordpress.com&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The story resurfaced during the 2008 primaries, only this time the denials weren't so strong and adopted a more forgiving attitude.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2008/01/17/sex-lies-and-major-headlines&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://epubbookonline.com/b/3035/roger-stone/the-clintons-war-on-women/27&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many blacks and Obama supporters were put off by the mainstresm media spin and questioned the untimely death of Ron Brown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wc.blackplanet.com/news/article_comments.html?news_item_id=46467&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://aapoliticalpundit.blogspot.com/2007/12/blacks-clintons-presidency-and-ron.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even the ''Washington Post'' noticed the racial undercurrent in Hillary Clinton's campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/22/AR2007122201762.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Ron Brown ===&lt;br /&gt;
The death of Ron Brown remains a controversial subject among African-Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/BMXnPYGDgVc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ron Brown was the first black [[Secretary of Commerce]] who died in the crash of Air Force Two. The crash occurred one week before Brown was slated to give testimony in the Clinton campaign finance scandal, among other scandals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/HR-WkSEzaho&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Confederate Flag Day ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Arkansas Legislature's Act 116 of 1987 designated the star above the word &amp;quot;Arkansas&amp;quot; on the state flag as a commemoration of the Confederacy, signed into law by Gov. Clinton, as well as annual proclamations for Confederate Flag Day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 1985 Clinton signed Act 985 into law, making the birthdates of Martin Luther King Jr. and [[Robert E. Lee]], General of the Confederate army, state holidays on the same day. The coded message sent to white constituents could not have be clearer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Black lives don't matter ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Blmhillary (1).jpg|right|350px|thumb|Democrat Presidential nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton confronted by Black Lives Matter protesters in 2016.]]&lt;br /&gt;
On the eve of the [[New Hampshire]] primary in 1992, Bill Clinton took off from the campaign trail to sign the death warrant and oversee the execution of a retarded black man, Ricky Ray Rector. Recktor, who had been lobotomized, was mentally incompetent and unable to understand the charges against him.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://skepticalbrotha.wordpress.com/tag/christopher-hitchens/ Christopher Hitchens], Skeptical Brotha. Retrieved 23 June 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blackstarnews.com/us-politics/elections/bill-clinton-hopped-up-on-whack-ricky-ray-rector-part-2.html Bill Clinton &amp;quot;Hopped Up On Whack&amp;quot; -- Ricky Ray Rector Part 2], Colin Benjamin, Black Star News, April 13, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;It was like executing a child,&amp;quot; the prison chaplain said. Hillary, the master strategist of the Clintons' rise, fearing the Willie Horton syndrome which torpedoed [[Michael Dukakis]] in 1988 and the 'monkey business' which destroyed [[Gary Hart]] as well, still defended the execution in 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://theintercept.com/2016/03/17/hillary-clintons-indefensible-stance-on-the-death-penalty/ Hillary Clinton's Indefensible Stance on the Death Penalty], Liliana Segura, ''The Intercept'', Mar. 17 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.salon.com/2016/01/31/the_clintons_sordid_race_game_no_one_will_say_it_but_the_clintons_rise_was_premised_on_repudiating_black_voters/ Jan 31, 2016 04:00 AM MDT The Clintons' sordid race game: No one will say it, but the Clintons' rise was premised on repudiating black voters], Corey Robin, ''Salon'', Jan. 31, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary was at his side when Bill Clinton raised mandatory sentencing guidelines which disproportionately sent Blacks to prison, giving the United States the highest mass incarceration rate in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://newrepublic.com/article/129433/clintons-war-drugs-black-lives-didnt-matter The Clintons' War on Drugs: When Black Lives Didn't Matter], By Donna Murch, ''The New Republic'', February 9, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Clinton's championed the &amp;quot;three strikes you're out&amp;quot; law, passed a crime bill that created dozens of new federal capital crimes, mandated life sentences for some three-time offenders, and authorized more than $16 billion for more state prisons. By the time the Clintons left office in 2001, the United States had the highest rate of incarceration in the world. [[Human Rights Watch]] reported that in seven states, African Americans constituted 80 to 90 percent of all drug offenders even though they were no more likely than whites to use or sell illegal drugs. Prison admissions for drug offenses reached a level in 2000 for African Americans more than 26 times the level they had been under [[Ronald Reagan]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thenation.com/article/hillary-clinton-does-not-deserve-black-peoples-votes/ Why Hillary Clinton Doesn't Deserve the Black Vote], Michelle Alexander, ''The Nation'', February 10, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 2015, while several American cities smoldered in riots over police shootings, Hillary Clinton had several prison industry lobbyists working as fundraisers on her campaign. The fundraiser-lobbyists worked for the Corrections Corporation of America and Geo Group, which also run most of the [[immigrant]] detention centers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/while-missouri-students-battle-racism-prison-lobbyists-funded-hillary-clintons-campaign_b_8553370.html While Missouri Students Battle Racism, Prison Lobbyists Funded Hillary Clinton's Campaign], H.A. Goodman, ''Huffington Post'', Nov 13, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Racial profiling Hispanics ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Clintons instituted [[racial profiling]] of [[Latino]]s as drug dealers in 1988. Specifically, the troopers were authorized to stop and search cars driven by Hispanics, especially those with Texas license plates. Again, the Clintons' Criminal Apprehension Program was challenged in federal court and ruled unconstitutional. But the program went on anyway with further destruction of civil liberties when the Clintons authorized state troopers to stop and search any car regardless of race.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-56765970.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Roberto Garcia de Posada, executive director of the Hispanic Business Roundtable, cited the fact that Clinton was &amp;quot;a strong supporter of racial profiling against Hispanics,&amp;quot; and thst they do not have &amp;quot;the moral authority to lead a national campaign on this issue.&amp;quot; The Clintons need to &amp;quot;apologize to all those Hispanics who suffered this 'morally indefensible' practice&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Naked racism ===&lt;br /&gt;
A Black Lives Matter activist confront Hillary Clinton in 2016 about the Clintons' history of [[racism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fair.org/home/why-did-it-take-an-activist-to-bring-superpredators-into-the-campaign/ Why Did It Take an Activist to Bring 'Superpredators' Into the Campaign?], By Jim Naureckas, FAIR, 27 Feb 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In January 2016 ''[[Salon]]'' published an article on the dirty little secret among the liberal intelligentsia no one wants to talk about: the Clintons' rise and success has been based on stoking racial fears. Stan Greenberg conducted the focus groups that dictated the Clintons' daily buzzwords and talking points to provide the fodder and fuel the Clintons lived and died on. Greenberg's work produced results claiming the Democratic party was too identified with [[Jesse Jackson]] and minorities to speak for 'average Americans' and it needed to appeal to white working class swing voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://prospect.org/article/crisis-working-majority-0 From Crisis to Working Majority], Stan Greenberg, ''The American Prospect'' 2, no. 7 (September 1991). Republished 24 May 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps nothing reveals the cold, cruel, calculated and hateful divisiveness in the heart of the woman than her comment to Sam Donaldson on ABC's ''Prime Time Live'' that Gennifer Flowers was the daughter of Willie Horton. Intended as a throwaway line, with all the facts in now&amp;amp;nbsp;— that it was a lie and she knew it was a lie&amp;amp;nbsp;— we see the cynical manipulation of people, particularly those in the civil rights and women's movements, and her incipient predations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=1j6Xy5FnBzkC&amp;amp;pg=PA268&amp;amp;lpg=PA268&amp;amp;dq=gennifer+flowers+is+the+daughter+of+willie+horton&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=LIylbGcmHA&amp;amp;sig=35GnRjdcZx32qV_stExpcJV0PFw&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwjPgdST5s3NAhUIKGMKHfDfCOgQ6AEIODAE#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=gennifer%20flowers%20is%20the%20daughter%20of%20willie%20horton&amp;amp;f=false The Rhetoric of First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton: Crisis Management Discourse], Colleen E. Kelley, Greenwood Publishing Group, 2001, pp. 268-269&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1992 for the first time in nearly half a century the party platform made no mention of redressing racial injustice. Through triangulation and a policy of 'get tuff on crime', the Clintons sought to repudiate and distance themselves from the Democratic party's commitment to the struggles of [[African-American]]s. The Clinton's formulated a crime bill purportedly to &amp;quot;put 100,000 new cops on the street&amp;quot;. Hillary became one of the chief spokespersons referring to black teens as dogs.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called 'super-predators.' No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why they ended up that way but first we have to bring them to heel.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/bernie-sanders-slams-clintons-racist-1996-super-predators-comment/ Bernie Sanders slams Clinton's &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; 1996 super predators comment], By Reena Flores, CBS News, April 14, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fair.org/extra/superscapegoating/ Superscapegoating], Teen 'superpredators' hype set stage for draconian legislation, By Robin Templeton, FAIR, 1 Jan 1998&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
In the 2008 presidential primaries, the Clintons were back at it: fostering racial fear and paranoia,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alternet.org/story/80258/america's_new_racial_reality%3A_white_minority_status America's New Racial Reality: White Minority Status], While Obama raises the bar for racial understanding, the Democratic Leadership Council leverages white voter fear. By Roberto Lovato / New America Media, March 21, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which by now seemed to be the regular program of the Democratic Leadership Council.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.blackcommentator.com/46/46_cover.html Muzzling The African-American Agenda With Black Help], Bruce A. Dixon, ''The Black Commentator''. www.blackcommentator.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; They tried to marginalize Obama as the black candidate with comparisons to Jesse Jackson&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/26/bill-clinton-obama-is-jus_n_83406.html Bill Clinton: Obama Is Just Like Jesse Jackson], ''Huffington Post'', 03/28/2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; emphasizing Hillary's 'wide appeal': &amp;quot;Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again&amp;quot;, Hillary told ''USA Today''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-07-clintoninterview_N.htm Clinton makes case for wide appeal], By Kathy Kiely and Jill Lawrence, USA TODAY, 5/8/2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She mocked and ridiculed Obama's fitness to lead on his no first strike nuclear pledge saying, &amp;quot;I don't believe that any president should make any blanket statements with respect to the use or nonuse of nuclear weapons,&amp;quot; whereas two months earlier she promised to nuke Iran. She stayed in the race even after it became apparent she lost, according to her, only because Obama might be assassinated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As heir to the [[New Deal]] tradition and key to the New England donor base, Sen. [[Ted Kennedy]]'s blessing on the candidate for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination was vital. The Clinton's also were seeking bona fides among liberals and the [[civil rights]] movement. Clinton said of Obama, &amp;quot;that boy would have been carrying our bags and getting us coffee a few years ago&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://urbanintellectuals.com/2015/07/17/did-you-know-bill-clinton-made-racist-comments-about-barack-obama-when-he-first-ran-for-president/ Did You Know Bill Clinton Made Racist Comments About Barack Obama When He First Ran For President], F. Taylor, Urban Intellectuals, July 17, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kennedy was offended by Clinton's racism and refused to give Hillary the endorsement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/apr/28/hillaryclinton.usa Hillary has cynically turned to the one argument she has left: race], Gary Younge, ''Guardian'' UK, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.alternet.org/story/80258/america's_new_racial_reality%3A_white_minority_status America's New Racial Reality: White Minority Status], While Obama raises the bar for racial understanding, the Democratic Leadership Council leverages white voter fear. By Roberto Lovato / New America Media, March 21, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Haitian abductions ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See: [[Pizzagate]]''&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010, Bill Clinton, through the Clinton Foundation, worked for the release of 10 adults who had been arrested transporting 33 [[Haiti]]an children abducted from their families across the border to the [[Dominican Republic]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/vzVAcn1YkcY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== African sex slaves ===&lt;br /&gt;
Again, this advocate of women and children's rights was asked repeatedly in 2011 to designate [[Boko Haram]] as a terrorist organization after the group bombed the [[United Nations]] headquarters in Abuja. Secretary Clinton's State Department refused, despite requests coming from the U.S. Justice Department, the FBI, the [[CIA]], and numerous Senators and Congressmen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-dropped-ball-boko-haram-020300046--politics.html?ref=gs Hillary Dropped the Ball on Boko Haram], Josh Rogin, [The Daily Beast], May 7, 2014. www.yahoo.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In May 2012, Justice Department official Lisa Monaco wrote to the State Department to urge Clinton to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist organization. The following month, Gen. Carter Ham, the chief of U.S. Africa Command, said that Boko Haram provided a 'safe haven' for al Qaeda in the Maghreb (al Qaeda in North Africa) and was likely sharing explosives and funds with the group.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Morrissey, Ed (May 8, 2014). [https://hotair.com/archives/2014/05/08/did-hillary-refuse-to-designate-boko-haram-as-a-terrorist-organization/ Did Hillary refuse to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist organization?] Hot Air website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The American counterterrorism agencies were asking for the legal authority to begin countering Boko Haram. Boko Haram is now an Islamic State province but at the time it held allegiance to al Qaeda. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, at the behest of French and British [[corporate]] interests was in negotiation with several al Qaeda affiliates&amp;amp;nbsp;— [[al Qaeda in the Maghreb]], the [[Libyan Islamic Fighting Group]], and Ansar al Shariah&amp;amp;nbsp;— to destabilize Muammar Gaddafi in Libya at the time and didn't want to antagonize or alienate her allies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2014 Boko Haram kidnapped 276 teenage schoolgirls, most of whom were Black, and announced its intention to sell them as [[marital]] [[sex]] [[slave]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theledger.com/opinion/20160927/letter-for-hillary-money-matters-more&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Birth of the birther movement ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See [[Obama birth certificate lawsuits]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign team began spreading [[Islamophobic]] rumors that Obama was a Muslim schooled in a ''madrassa'' as a child in Indonesia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/05/bill-clinton-barack-obama-bromance-long-slow-making Bill Clinton and Barack Obama: an alliance long and slow in the making], Gary Younge, ''Guardian'' UK.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20080506093354/http://www.stop-obama.org/?page_id=23 Who is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA?] Mission Statement, stop-obama.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Clinton advisor Sidney Blumenthal, working through his son, Max Blumenthal, was the origin of the rumors that Barack Hussein Obama was a Muslim in order to stir up fear among the electorate which was intended to discredit Obama and work to Hillary's benefit.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-great-islamophobic-crusade/ The Great Islamophobic Crusade], CBSNEWS, December 19, 2010. cbsnews.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It began with People United Means Action (PUMA), a group of Hillary Clinton supporters who not only opposed Barack Obama's nomination, but then went on to oppose his Presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/bifsEkjTAc8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; PUMA members pointed to charges that the media directed sexism and misogyny at Clinton during the primary campaign and expressed anger at Democratic Party leaders' failure to speak out against that or otherwise respond appropriately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political Correctness summit gaffe ===&lt;br /&gt;
During a political correctness summit, where she acted as a keynote speaker, she let her views on blacks out publicly where she stated that &amp;quot;all [blacks] look alike [to her].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.teaparty.org/hillary-clinton-says-blacks-look-alike-political-correctness-summit-330890/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== U.S. Senate ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article [[Hillary Clinton Senate career]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== FALN ===&lt;br /&gt;
In preparation for her Senate bid, Bill Clinton offered clemency to members of the [[Armed Forces of National Liberation]] (FALN) [[terrorist]] group&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20080501015940/http://rpc.senate.gov/_files/92199CoddlingTerrorists.pdf &amp;quot;Coddling terrorists?&amp;quot;] (September 21, 1999). Senate Republican Policy Committee. Retrieved from May 1, 2008 archive at Internet Archive.&lt;br /&gt;
*U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary (September 15, 1999). [https://web.archive.org/web/20000416225221/https://www.senate.gov/~judiciary/wl91599.htm &amp;quot;Witness list (and transcribed statements): Hearing before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 'Clemency for FALN Members'&amp;quot;]. U.S. Senate website/Committee on the Judiciary. Retrieved from April 16, 2000 archive at Internet Archive.&lt;br /&gt;
*U.S. Senate, 106th Congress (September 14, 1999). [https://www.congress.gov/bill/106th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/33 &amp;quot;S.J. Res. 106-33: A joint resolution deploring the actions of President Clinton regarding granting clemency to FALN terrorists.&amp;quot;] U.S. Congress website/Legislation/106th Congress/Senate joint resolutions. Passed 95-2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to curry favor with [[radical]] [[Puerto Rican]] voters among the New York electorate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.jonathanpollard.org/senate.htm &amp;quot;FALN clemency and NY Senate race&amp;quot;] (1999-2009). Justice for Jonathan Pollard website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The FALN bombed the historic Fraunces Tavern in [[Manhattan]], killing four people in 1975. Over a six-year period, the group claimed responsibility for more than 100 bombings that took six lives and injured some 130 people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.latinamericanstudies.org/puertorico/sep4.htm &amp;quot;Clinton pardons terror&amp;quot;] (August 13, 1999). ''New York Post''. Reprinted at Latin American Studies website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Illegal fundraising, 2000 ===&lt;br /&gt;
In January 2006 Hillary Clinton's New York Senate 2000 campaign was fined by the FEC for failing to accurately report $721,895 in contributions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.fec.gov/press/press2006/20060126mur.html &amp;quot;Press release, Matter under review 5225&amp;quot;] (January 26, 2006). Federal Election Commission website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Illegal fundraising, 2007 ===&lt;br /&gt;
Norman Hsu was a 'HillRaiser', someone who brought in more than $860,000 for her 2008 presidential campaign, and co-hosted a $1 million fundraiser in Beverly Hills. Hsu had been convicted of defrauding investors of over $1 million in 1992 and had a fugitive warrant out for over 15 years at the time. Hillary had been warned about the source of the contributions earlier, but only returned the money after the scandal became public.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Secretary of State ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article [[Hillary Clinton Secretary of State]]&lt;br /&gt;
As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was empowered to approve or reject commercial arms sales to foreign governments based upon a broad range of reasons, from [[national security]] considerations to [[human rights]] concerns. This often brought her into a [[legal]] and [[ethical]] [[conflict of interest]] with donors to the [[Clinton Foundation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sen. [[Elizabeth Warren]] has also criticized the foreign corporations that donate cash to the Clinton Foundation, citing &amp;quot;a French company&amp;quot;, the Veolia Group, &amp;quot;that sued Egypt after Egypt raised its minimum wage.&amp;quot; Veolia contributed between $50,000 and $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Warren criticized Philip Morris, part of the Altria group, another Clinton Foundation donor. And &amp;quot;a Swedish company&amp;quot;, Vattenfall, a state-owned Swedish utility; the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency has contributed between $1 million and $10 million.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://freebeacon.com/politics/elizabeth-warren-targets-clinton-foundation-donors/ Elizabeth Warren Targets Clinton Foundation Donors], Brent Scher, May 8, 2015. freebeacon.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She was a staunch advocate of American boots on the ground in [[Syria]] and [[Libya]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://consortiumnews.com/2016/06/17/the-war-risk-of-hillary-clinton/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She has promised, if elected President, greater intervention,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/time-delay-over-hillary-clinton-outlines-plan-combat-isis-n466346&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the use of nuclear weapons against [[Iran]] if Iran were to launch a nuclear attack against [[Israel]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/857guwaNbRc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton later admitted to having emailed over 100 government officials, including President Obama, through her personal email account.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klein, Aaron (September 13, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/13/hillary-clinton-admits-emailed-100-government-employees-private-server/ Hillary Clinton Admits She Emailed Over 100 Government Employees from Private Server]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 14, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Hillary Clinton Doctrine of smart power ===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obama war crimes}}&lt;br /&gt;
After being rejected for the top leadership of her party in 2008, the 62-year-old Clinton tenaciously held onto a quest for power, releasing her convention delegates and being granted the position of Secretary of State. Neither Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, or George W. Bush were particularly qualified in the area of foreign affairs, but in the Democratic party a resume that includes reforming Arkansas public schools, receiving an appointment based on [[nepotism]] to squander tens of millions of dollars for a federal healthcare study program that never took shape, or serving as a non-distinct Senator with no tangible accomplishments qualifies a person to hold a high level position in a time of international crisis that neither they, nor their boss, understand anything about.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'Don't do stupid stuff' was President Obama's instructions to Hillary, the mantra being that George W. Bush was 'stupid', and therefore anything that departed from the policies of G.W. Bush was 'smart'. From this evolved Hillary's doctrine of 'smart power', overthrowing regimes with weapons supplied by donors to the Clinton Foundation without putting U.S. boots on the ground and unleashing millions of refugees worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this 'smart power' needed a formal name; in recent decades several President's had 'doctrines' named after themselves&amp;amp;nbsp;— the Nixon Doctrine, the Carter Doctrine, the Bush Doctrine; Bill Clinton was cheated, he never had any interest in foreign policy and little impact, so now it was time for a 'Clinton Doctrine', that is, the 'Hillary Clinton Doctrine' formulated by a Secretary of State that she could ride into the White House with. Thus began the quest to overthrow a U.S. ally as a favor to foreign donors to the Clintons. President Obama woke up too late to see how he had been used and manipulated to bring about a massive humanitarian crisis, and the damage Hillary Clinton's machinations have done to his presidency and legacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in all, the team of President Obama and Secretary Clinton has been a disaster for the world. Teaming up support for the 2016 Presidential election as loyal Democrats is a farce; they already are blaming each other for the hundreds of thousands dead, and the 2,000,000 refugees who have flooded across Europe just since 2014. And they most assuredly will continue to blame each other in their memoirs. A [[skeptic]] may say it doesn't matter, Middle Easterners don't vote in U.S. elections; but a skeptic might also have no problem voting for a leader with no [[conscience]]. The world is now in the midst of a serious displaced persons refugee crisis, the most serious since the end of [[World War II]] in 1945.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Catastrophic aftermath ====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mass beheading of Christians in Libya.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Hillary's War culminated in the creation of the [[Islamic State]] and mass beheading of [[Christian]]s.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear armed dictators such as [[Kim Jong-un]] witnessed how Gaddafi had been lied to and double-crossed by Secretary Clinton and her consortium.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;theatlantic.com&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Decades of negotiation were lost with him, his father, and his grandfather, to persuade [[North Korea]] to give up its WMD, nukes and [[ballistic missile]] programs, return to the community of 'civilized nations', and to live in peace and harmony by accepting the word of the United States chief negotiator, the Secretary of State. When North Korea illegally tested an above-ground nuclear device in January 2016 it specifically cited the fate of Gaddafi as to why it needs a nuclear deterrent.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;telegraph.co.uk&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The brave new world Hillary built in Libya soon descended into chaos. The irascible [[jihad]]i elements Hillary and Obama supported turned their U.S. supplied weapons on American territory, the Embassy at Benghazi. Hillary's 'moderate rebels' -- [[al-Qaeda in the Maghreb]] and the [[Libyan Islamic Fighting Group]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/21/benghazi-raid-libyan-revolution Benghazi raid leaves cradle of Libyan revolution fearing for its future] ''[[The Guardian]]'' September 21, 2012. &amp;quot;There was no demonstration. They came with machine guns, with rockets.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;—killed the American Ambassador reportedly in the same fashion Gaddafi had been murdered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.aina.org/news/20120913165253.htm Ambassador Stevens Was Raped Before His Murder, Reports Claim], 2012-09-13. www.aina.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; All this was occurring on American soil only 56 days prior to the [[Presidential Election 2012|2012 Presidential election]] where the slogan was &amp;quot;[[Osama Bin Laden#Abbottabad raid|Bin Laden is dead]], [[Crony capitalism|GM is alive]], and al Qaeda is on the run.&amp;quot; The deceptive narrative denying America had been attacked was issued by Hillary Clinton at nearly the precise time Ambassador [[Christopher Stevens]] was viciously murdered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUObFqU5cgE Here's the KEY MOMENT in Benghazi hearings&amp;amp;nbsp;— Rep. Jordan nails Hillary on LIES], posted by [[Pamela Geller]], Oct 22, 2015. youtube.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Libyan fiasco stiffened the resolve of [[Vladimir Putin]]. Putin did not veto the U.N. Security Council which passed a 'fig leaf' resolution to give its proponents, Hillary Clinton, [[Nicolas Sarkozy#Libyan affair|Nicolas Sarkozy]], [[David Cameron]] and Barack Obama an air of legitimacy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/forgotten-war-understanding-incredible-debacle-left-behind-nato-libya.html Understanding The Incredible Debacle Left Behind By NATO In Libya], Posted on February 28, 2015 by WashingtonsBlog.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/10/hillary-clinton-the-queen-of-chaos-and-the-threat-of-world-war-iii/ Hillary Clinton: the Queen of Chaos and the Threat of World War III], by Maidhc Ó Cathail – Diana Johnstone, March 10, 2016. www.counterpunch.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Amidst the ensuing chaos they began blaming each other. Once the duplicity and betrayal of the U.S. State Department under Hillary Clinton became obvious, Putin moved to shore up defense of his own allies&amp;amp;nbsp;— Russians residing in the [[Ukraine]] and [[Crimea]], and [[Syria]]n President [[Bashar al-Assad]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603 Address by President of the Russian Federation], March 18, 2014. en.kremlin.ru&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Putin felt betrayed, the U.N. Security Council resolution was only to provide a no-fly zone aircover for the rebels, not an authorization for direct attacks and intervention against Gaddafi's forces as Putin had been assured beforehand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Iranian nuke deal ===&lt;br /&gt;
The ''EU Times'' reported on 30 December 2012 Hillary Clinton had been injured in the crash landing of a C-12 Huron military aircraft 3 weeks prior in the city of Ahvaz,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eutimes.net/2012/12/clinton-injured-us-navy-seal-killed-in-secret-us-mission-to-iran/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Iran while on a secret mission in preparation of the Iranian nuclear deal and lifting sanctions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.americannewsservice.org/search/label/Commander%20Job%20W.%20Price&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The report was ciculated among Hillary's staffers who joking referred to it as a conspiracy theory until Les Horn responded to Anthony Milavic on 3 January 2013,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Anthony -- FYI. The report appears to be credible. Les&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/9457&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Reports say upon landing the plane encountered &amp;quot;extreme turbulence&amp;quot; causing it to leave the runway where its main landing gear then collapsed. Within seconds Iranian emergency and security personal responded freeing the victims, including Secretary Clinton who was reportedly unconscious and &amp;quot;bleeding profusely.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''EU Times'' noted, &amp;quot;US media reports state that Secretary Clinton will return to work next week after her having suffered what they describe as a &amp;quot;nasty bout with stomach flu&amp;quot; and a &amp;quot;concussion&amp;quot; which have kept her missing from public view the past three weeks. The ''Debkafile'' confirmed these reports.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20130101003102/http://debka.com/article/22645/Hillary-Clinton-in-hospital-amid-speculation-of-plane-accident-in-Iran&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Boko Haram ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Nigerian girls.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Hillary Clinton did nothing to protect the lives and safety of 276 Christian girls kidnapped by [[Boko Haram]] and sold as sex slaves, despite multiple agency requests. The Obama administration furnished the same organization SAM-7 missiles capable of shooting down commercial and military aircraft.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/libyan-missiles-on-the-loose/2012/05/08/gIQA1FCUBU_story.html?utm_term=.a091217ed1fd Libyan missiles on the loose], By [[David Ignatius]], Washington Post Opinion writer, May 8, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton refused to place [[Boko Haram]] on the State Department's list of foreign terrorist organizations in 2011, after the group bombed the UN headquarters in Abuja. The refusal came despite the urging of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and over a dozen Senators and Congressmen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Morrissey, Ed (May 8, 2014). [https://hotair.com/archives/2014/05/08/did-hillary-refuse-to-designate-boko-haram-as-a-terrorist-organization/ &amp;quot;Did Hillary refuse to designate Boko Haram as a terrorist organization?&amp;quot;] Hot Air website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Placing Boko Haram on the State Department's terrorist list would then give legal authority to the CIA or FBI to act. At the time, Hillary was deeply involved in negotiations with and efforts to arm various Al Qaeda entities to overthrow Gaddafi and Assad.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boko Haram, a terrorist group numbering 15,000 in three countries of West Africa, has murdered at least 20,000 people and displaced another 2.6 million. Boko Haram in 2011 was affiliated with [[Al Qaeda in the Maghreb]]; by 2017 it had the Islamic States' largest number of members.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014 Boko Haram kidnapped 276 Black African Christian girls and has sold them into slavery, reports indicate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Saudi Arabia and the Clinton Foundation ===&lt;br /&gt;
Once Saddam Hussein fell in April 2003, the [[Bush administration]] hastily closed Prince Sultan Airbase ending a long-term commitment to the defense of Saudi Arabia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/prince-sultan.htm Prince Sultan Air Base, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia]. globalsecurity.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the end of the decade the Clinton Foundation received millions from an organization known as the Friends of Saudi Arabia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/18/clinton.donations Clinton's foundation got millions from Saudis, Gates], CNN, December 18, 2008. Univision TV owner also gave millions.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With the theft of government records, and the admission Hillary scrubbed the server, the exact extent of a conflict of interest and other violations of law at present is unclear.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://insider.foxnews.com/2015/03/30/gowdy-hillary-clinton-wiped-her-server-between-october-and-december-2014 Gowdy: Hillary Clinton Wiped Server Between October &amp;amp; December 2014], On the Record with Greta Van Susteren, ''[[FOX News]]'', 30 March 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-clinton-email-scandal-20160327-story.html How Hillary Clinton's email scandal took root], Robert O'Harrow Jr., ''Washington Post'', 27 March 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Rape victims ====&lt;br /&gt;
As Secretary of State, the Clinton Foundation accepted donations from the Kingdom of [[Saudi Arabia]], where rape victims are regularly flogged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/09/us/politics/hillary-clinton-faces-test-of-record-aiding-women.html?_r=1 Hillary Clinton Faces Test of Record as Women's Advocate], By AMY CHOZICK, ''New York Times'', MARCH 8, 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mrctv.org/blog/rand-paul-stone-age-barbaric-saudi-arabia-buying-influence-donating-hillary-clinton Rand Paul: 'Hillary Clinton Shouldn't Have Taken That Money' from Saudi Arabia], Barbara Boland | March 25, 2015. www.mrctv.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.gop.com/clinton-foundation-takes-from-countries-that-mistreat-women/ Clinton Foundation Takes $$ From Countries That Mistreat Women], October 11, 2015. www.gop.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/clintons-outrage-at-saudi-rape-sentence/2007/11/22/1195321896405.html Clinton's 'outrage' at Saudi rape sentence], ''Sydney Morning Herald'', November 22, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Conservative group claims Hillary Clinton's foundation took millions from foreign governments, [https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/feb/26/american-crossroads/conservative-group-claims-hillary-clintons-foundat/ Politifact: Statement:'''TRUE'''], By Steve Contorno, February 26th, 2015. politifact.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2015, a 19-year-old woman who was the victim of a violent gang rape was sentenced to 200 lashes and six months in jail after found guilty of being &amp;quot;indecent&amp;quot; at the time of the attack. Saudi law dictates a woman must have a male escort in public. She originally was sentenced to 90 lashes; on appeal the sentence was more than doubled to 200 lashes and six months in jail after found guilty of indecency and exposing the case in the media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Gay rights ====&lt;br /&gt;
While [[homosexuality]] is punishable by [[death]] under certain circumstances, this particular active Clinton donor at the present time is seeking to increase the frequency at which [[execution]]s of [[gay]]s is carried out. The Saudi judicial system blames [[Social media]] for causing an increase in 'deliberate' acts of homosexuality. As of the first half of 2016, there were 35 people on death row in Saudi Arabia for sodomy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/saudi-arabia-pushes-homosexuals-executed-7672283 Saudi Arabia 'pushes for homosexuals to be executed' amid fears social media is 'turning people gay'], By Rhian Lubin, ''Mirror'', 1 April 2016. www.mirror.co.uk&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Arms sales ====&lt;br /&gt;
As Sec. Clinton approved weapons transfers, both Saudi Arabia [[Boeing]] aircraft made donations to the Clinton Foundation. The ''[[The Washington Post]]'' revealed that a Boeing [[lobbyist]] was also working as a fundraiser in the early stages of Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/for-hillary-clinton-and-boeing-a-beneficial-relationship/2014/04/13/21fe84ec-bc09-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html For Hillary Clinton and Boeing, a beneficial relationship], By Rosalind S. Helderman, ''Washington Post'', April 13, 2014.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Boeing F15 fighters'''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Early in her tenure the $29.4 Billion sale and upgrades of Boeing F15 fighter aircraft was a 'top priority'. The Saudi air campaign in [[Yemen]] has been led by American-made F-15 fighter jets. According to the United Nations at least 2,800 civilians have been killed in airstrikes so far.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=52938#.V2iKGKLT9aU Yemen: civilian casualties top 8,100 as airstrikes and shelling continue, UN reports], 5 January 2016. un.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Three facilities supported by Doctors Without Borders have been bombed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Cluster bombs'''&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The U.N. Secretary General has decried &amp;quot;intense airstrikes in residential areas and on civilian buildings in Sanaa, including the chamber of commerce, a wedding hall, and a center for the blind,&amp;quot; and has warned that reports of cluster bombs being used in populated areas &amp;quot;may amount to a [[war crime]] due to their indiscriminate nature.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://theintercept.com/2016/02/22/saudi-christmas-present/ Emails Show Hillary Clinton Aides Celebrating F-15 Sales to Saudi Arabia: &amp;quot;Good News&amp;quot;], Lee Fang, ''The Intercept'', Feb. 22 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Human Rights Watch]] released a report providing new indications that Saudi Arabia has fired American-made cluster munitions, banned by international treaty, in civilian areas of Yemen. [https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/15/world/middleeast/new-report-of-us-made-cluster-bomb-use-by-saudis-in-yemen.html?_r=0 New Report of U.S.-Made Cluster Bomb Use by Saudis in Yemen], By RICK GLADSTONEFEB, ''New York Times'', February 14, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== European migrant crisis ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:IMG 20170511 212807.jpg|right|300px|thumb|The European refugee crisis, the result of what the Washington Post calls ''Hillary's War's''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/hillarys-war-how-conviction-replaced-skepticism-in-libya-intervention/2011/10/28/gIQAhGS7WM_story.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;— has permanently transformed European society.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article:'' [[European migrant crisis]]&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Libyan uprising|Libyan Civil War]] and [[Syrian War]], the legacies of President [[Barack Hussein Obama]] and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton's failed &amp;quot;[[Arab Spring]]&amp;quot; [[foreign policy]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/10/middle-east-egypt-us-policy/409537/ Islamism, the Arab Spring, and the Failure of America's Do-Nothing Policy in the Middle East], SHADI HAMID, ''The Atlantic'', OCT 9, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;— which according to their own public pronouncements was supposed to overthrow corrupt [[secular]] dictators and establish [[democracies]] by arming and assisting anti-democratic [[Islamist]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110523-obama-and-arab-kspring Obama and the Arab Spring], George Friedman, ''Stratfor'', MAY 24, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;amp;nbsp;— resulted in attacks on gays and women, mass beheadings, wholesale slaughter,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.jihadwatcheurope.org/daesh-slaughters-200-syrian-children-in-a-savage-mass-execution/ Daesh mass execution of 200 Syrian children, 2014]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and a tsunami in excess of 6 million homeless migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, and jihadis invading Europe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.unrefugees.org/2015/06/a-world-at-war/ Global Trends Forced Displacement in 2015], UNHCR, June 18, 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One major factor in [[Brexit]] is the [[European refugee crisis]], causing [[Britain]] to tighten its borders. Over 2 million Muslims settled in Germany&amp;amp;nbsp;— 4 times larger than Germany's standing military, in 2015 as a result of Hillary's call for &amp;quot;Assad must go.&amp;quot; Nearly one million natural born citizens of their homeland left Germany at the same time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/2016/07/16/over-2-million-muslims-migrated-to-germany-in-2015/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== NXIVM sex cult ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton collected tens of thousands of dollars from at least a dozen members of the NXIVM sex cult. It's co-founder, Nancy Salzman, plead guilty to sex slavery charges in March 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.courthousenews.com/co-founder-of-group-tied-to-sex-slavery-pleads-guilty/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Seagram's heiress [[Clare Bronfman]] hacked into Hillary Clinton's emails so cult bosses could read Clinton's emails.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Records-NXIVM-hacked-billionaire-s-emails-with-6576310.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Both Salzman and Bronfman are members of the exclusive millionaire donor's club, the [[Clinton Global Initiative]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2007/10/01/hillarys-30000-fans-are-her-cult-following/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; NXIVM founder Keith Raniere was charged with manufacturing child pornography in March 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-crime-cult/self-help-guru-raniere-faces-u-s-child-porn-charges-associate-pleads-guilty-idUSKCN1QU2Z2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The NXIVM sex cult were in possession of Hillary Clinton classified State Department emails.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2016 Presidential election campaign ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hillary on the campaign trail.jpg|right|400px|thumb|Black faces were conspicuously absent from Clinton rallies; among other shocking revelations, the Pedosta emails flatly stated the Clinton machine &amp;quot;conspires to produce an unaware and compliant citizenry.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/trending/2016/10/13/podesta-pal-we-conspire-to-produce-an-unaware-and-compliant-citizenry/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article: [[2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign]]''&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Presidential Election 2016|Clinton donors in the Panama Papers|Hillary Clinton email scandal|Fake news in the 2016 presidential election|FBI scandal|Spygate|Ukrainian collusion|Bill and Hillary Clinton and racism}}, ''[[United States presidential election, 2016#Clinton attacks on women|Clinton attacks on women]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton has held several public offices, and also ran for president in 2008 and 2016. In 2008 she lost to [[Barack Obama]], but she won the democratic nomination in a controversial and contested primary fight over [[populist]] [[Bernie Sanders]] during the [[2016 Presidential Election]]. Although Clinton won the popular vote 65,853,516 (46.1%) to 62,984,825 (48.2%), Trump won the [[electoral college]] vote, 306 to 232, with the incomplete vote count reported.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/election/results|title=Election Results|access-date=Nov. 12, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Robert Epstein of the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology testified before Congress that [[Google]] bias and meddling had shifted &amp;quot;between 2.6 million and up to 10.4 million votes&amp;quot; to Hillary Clinton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2019/08/psychologist-google-generated-at-least-2-6-million-votes-for-hillary.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Rigged nomination ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrat Iowa Caucus was very chaotic, poorly run, and whose results were very questionable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Samuelson, Darren (February 8, 2016). [https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/how-iowa-democrats-couldnt-handle-a-two-candidate-race-218934 Inside the Iowa caucus chaos]. ''Politico''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tuttle, Ian (February 5, 2016). [https://www.nationalreview.com/article/430878/hillary-clintons-iowa-victory-transparent-irregularities Iowa's Transparently Dishonest Democratic Caucus]. ''National Review''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jacobs, Jennifer (February 3, 2016). [http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/elections/presidential/caucus/2016/02/02/iowas-nightmare-revisited-correct-winner-called-caucus-night/79702010/ Iowa's nightmare revisited: Was correct winner called?] ''The Des Moines Register''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was reported that the results of 90 precincts, about 5 percent of the vote, went missing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://conservativetribune.com/iowa-caucus-democrat-party/ Iowa Democrat Party Issues Stunning Announcement About Caucus Results]. ''Conservative Tribune''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Democrat primary was rigged against Bernie Sanders and in favor of Hillary Clinton, and the party was shown to be helping Clinton behind the scenes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Griffin, Andrew (November 9, 2016). [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-elections/bernie-sanders-us-election-president-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-democrats-primary-results-a7408451.html Donald Trump won election because Democrats rigged system to have Clinton beat Bernie Sanders, says WikiLeaks]. ''The Independent''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hoft, Jim (October 18, 2016). [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/obama-lectures-media-integrity-elections-forgets-democrats-just-rigged-primary-bernie/ Obama Lectures Trump on &amp;quot;Rigged&amp;quot; Elections&amp;amp;nbsp;— Forgets That Democrats Just Rigged Primary Against Bernie]. ''The Gateway Pundit''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, the Democrat primary has &amp;quot;superdelegates&amp;quot;, who are made up of party leaders and can vote for whomever they want regardless of what the primary voters want.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Resnikoff, Ned (May 16, 2016). [http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/why-will-superdelegates-decide-2016-democratic-primary-unearthed-documents-hold Why Will Superdelegates Decide The 2016 Democratic Primary? Unearthed Documents Hold The Key]. ''International Business Times''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even the leftist website [[Salon Media Group]] believed the primary was rigged.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Demoro, Roseann (March 30, 2016). [https://www.salon.com/2016/03/30/10_ways_the_democratic_primary_has_been_rigged_from_the_start_partner/ 10 ways the Democratic primary has been rigged from the start]. ''Salon''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donna Brazile, the interim DNC Chair, shared Democrat primary town hall questions to the Clinton campaign in order to help her win the primary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shaw, Adam (March 17, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/17/brazile-admits-forwarded-debate-questions-to-clinton-camp.html Brazile admits she forwarded town hall questions to Clinton camp]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved March 17, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ernst, Douglas (March 17, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/17/donna-brazile-admits-leaking-debate-questions-to-c/ Donna Brazile admits leaking debate questions to Clinton camp: 'A mistake I will forever regret']. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved March 17, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She continued to deny this fact through February 2017&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scarry, Eddie (March 17, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/donna-brazile-finally-admits-she-shared-debate-questions-with-clinton-campaign/article/2617742 Donna Brazile finally admits she shared debate questions with Clinton campaign]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved March 17, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and blamed [[Russia]] for the ordeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hudson, Jerome (March 18, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/18/donna-brazile-admits-to-sharing-debate-questions-with-clinton-camp-blames-russia/ Donna Brazile Admits to Sharing Debate Questions With Clinton Camp, Blames Russia]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Wikileaks ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main articles:'' '''[[Murder of Seth Rich]]''' ''and'' '''[[Clinton body count]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton talking points emphasized the idea that US intelligence, the same people who brought you the [[WMD]] debacle, claim Russia and Putin are responsible for the hack of [[DNC]] servers which resulted in the firing of Democratic National Committee Chair [[Debbie Wasserman Schultz]]. This presumably would exonerate anyone connected with the DNC or Clinton campaign from complity in the Murder of Seth Rich.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Sethrich-e1494948876256.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Seth Rich (1989-2016) was a Sanders' supporter who leaked DNC emails to WikiLeaks. His bullet ridden body was found on a dark Washington DC street two weeks before Hillary's nominating convention.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails provided by [[Wikileaks]] showed clear [[collusion]] between Clinton, [[mainstream media]] outlets, and the DNC to smear [[Bernie Sanders]]. Thousands of hopeful millennials felt betrayed by the Democratic party. DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz was forced out on the eve of the convention, less than 24 hours after dozens of emails were published by Wikileaks showing her and her staff rigging the primary elections for Hillary Clinton.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikileaks founder [[Julian Assange]] has offered $20,000 cash reward for the arrest and conviction of Seth Rich's killers or killer, the alleged [[Whistleblower Statutes|whistleblower]] who provided the DNC emails to Wikileaks and was murdered execution style in early July 2016. Hillary says of Assange in an email, &amp;quot;Can't we just drone this guy?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://truepundit.com/under-intense-pressure-to-silence-wikileaks-secretary-of-state-hillary-clinton-proposed-drone-strike-on-julian-assange/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; To silence Assange, Wikileaks internet access was cut by the government of Ecuador after the release of Hillary's private paid speech to [[Goldman Sachs]]. Wikileaks Director, Prof. Gavin Macfayden, was found dead the following week. Macfayden's death was the third of a close associate of Assange in 6 months.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://mobile.twitter.com/wikileaks/status/790004642038050816/photo/1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Donna Brazile ===&lt;br /&gt;
After a live televised Commander-in-Chief discussion with [[NBC]]'s [[Matt Lauer]] where the questions were said to be agreed upon before hand, Lauer proceed to use the bulk of the time to press Hillary on questions of her controversial email server.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/kfGeXth-Do4&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When the broadcast was over, Hillary was reported to have f!own into a rage demanding Lauer to be fired. Addressing interim DNC Chair [[Donna Brazile]], Hillary proclaimed,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|You stare at the wall like a brain dead buffalo, while letting ******* Lauer get away with this betrayal? Get the **** to work janitoring this mess- do I make myself clear?}}&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://victuruslibertas.com/2016/09/temper-temper-killary-goes-on-rampage-for-over-an-hour-throwing-glass-at-staffers-head/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Divisive and dismissive comments ===&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary branded half of Trump's supporters as &amp;quot;deplorables&amp;quot; and called them &amp;quot;irredeemable&amp;quot;. Her spokeswoman called Roman Catholics &amp;quot;severely backwards&amp;quot; and charging that they don't know &amp;quot;what the hell they're talking about.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wolfgang, Ben (October 12, 2016). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/12/catholic-group-calls-clinton-spokeswomans-resignat/ Catholic group calls for Clinton spokeswoman's resignation after anti-Catholic comments in emails]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Illegal fundraising 2016 ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Harvey-weinstein-Hillary-clinton-dinner-with-after-election-loss (2).jpg|right|200px|thumb|'''Hillary Clinton dines with Democrat mega donor Harvey Weinstein after the 2016 election, December 13, 2016.''' Weinstein, a charter founder of the Clinton Legal Defense Fund organized to defend President Clinton from sexual harassment and assault charges, has been accused of [[rape]] by 97 women.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.businessinsider.com/list-of-women-who-have-accused-harvey-weinstein-of-sexual-harassment-or-assault-2017-10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Per election, an individual donor can contribute $2,700 to any candidate, $10,000 to any state party committee, and (during the 2016 cycle) $33,400 to a national party's main account. These groups can all get together and take a single check from a donor for the sum of those contribution limits&amp;amp;nbsp;— it's legal because the donor cannot exceed the base limit for any one recipient.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State parties however can make unlimited transfers to the national party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014 the [[Supreme Court]] made clear in ''McCutcheon v. FEC'', the Joint Finance Committee (JFC) may not solicit or accept contributions to circumvent base limits, through &amp;quot;earmarks&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;straw men&amp;quot; that are ultimately excessive&amp;amp;nbsp;— there are five separate prohibitions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Six-figure donations to the Clinton machine either never actually passed through state party accounts or were never actually under state party control, which adds false FEC reporting violations by the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF), state parties, and the DNC to other violations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Donna Brazile and others admitted that the DNC placed the funds under the Clinton campaign's direct control, a massive breach of campaign finance law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democratic donors, knowing the funds would end up with Clinton's campaign, wrote six-figure checks to influence the election&amp;amp;nbsp;— 100 times larger than allowed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
HVF bundled these megagifts and, on a single day, reported transferring money to all participating state parties, some of which would then show up on FEC reports filed by the DNC as transferring the exact same dollar amount on the exact same day to the DNC. Yet not all the state parties reported either receiving or transferring those sums.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/the-anatomy-of-hillary-clintons-84-million-money-laundering-scheme/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Results ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Scream.jpg|thumb|200px|left|Many Clinton supporters likened Hillary's loss, and Donald Trump's victory, to Edward Munch's ''The Scream''.]]&lt;br /&gt;
It was widely expected that Clinton would win the election, and the elite pollsters and &amp;quot;political insiders&amp;quot; all predicted a massive Clinton victory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vogel, Kenneth P. &amp;amp; Isenstadt, Alex (November 9, 2016). [https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/how-did-everyone-get-2016-wrong-presidential-election-231036 How did everyone get it so wrong?]. ''Politico''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Catanese, David (October 24, 2016). [https://www.usnews.com/news/the-run-2016/articles/2016-10-24/republicans-last-hope-the-polls-are-wrong Republicans' Last Hope: The Polls Are Wrong]. ''U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At least once, when a poll was released that actually showed Trump leading, Clinton's campaign dismissed it as &amp;quot;bad polling&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nelson, Louis (November 1, 2016). [https://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/clinton-campaign-bad-poll-abc-washington-post-230591 Clinton camp on new survey showing Trump ahead: It's 'bad polling']. ''Politico''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Instead, Trump won the election in a massive, historical upset, winning even states such as [[Pennsylvania]], [[Michigan]], and [[Wisconsin]], which a Republican had not won for 20–30 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/11/08/first-polls-close-in-2016-race-trump-projected-to-win-ind-ky-clinton-wins-vt.html Trump wins presidency, defeats Clinton in historic election upset]. ''Fox News''. November 8, 2016. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blake, Aaron (November 9, 2016). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/08/donald-trumps-path-to-victory-is-suddenly-looking-much-much-wider/ Donald Trump just blew up the electoral map]. ''The Washington Post''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The polling and predictions were off dramatically.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Flint, Joe &amp;amp; Alpert, Lukas I. (November 9, 2016). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/bad-polling-in-hand-media-misses-mark-badly-with-election-predictions-1478710860 How the Media's Election Predictions Badly Missed the Mark]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A version of ''[[Newsweek]]'' magazine was printed that reported a Clinton victory, saying &amp;quot;Madam President: Hillary Clinton's historic journey to the White House&amp;quot;, was published and distributed before the election results even came in.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Greenslade, Roy (November 10, 2016). [https://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2016/nov/10/if-only-donald-trump-had-come-second-eh-hillary Madam President: how Newsweek reported a Clinton victory]. ''The Guardian''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It appears that it is procedural and normal to make a copy for both candidates, but Clinton signed a copy of it prior to the election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Taylor, Kristinn (November 9, 2016). [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/11/hubris-hillary-clinton-signed-newsweek-madam-president-cover-election-eve/ Hubris: Hillary Clinton Signed Newsweek 'Madam President' Cover On Election Eve]. ''The Gateway Pundit''. Retrieved November 10, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She later admitted that she did not draft a concession speech.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shepherd, Todd (September 10, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-concedes-i-had-not-drafted-a-concession-speech/article/2633949 Hillary Clinton concedes: 'I had not drafted a concession speech']. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 11, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the election, ''The American Spectator'' reported that on the night of the election, Clinton threw a massive extreme temper tantrum after she had realized she lost the election.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HRCMeltdown&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. (November 14, 2016). [https://spectator.org/where-was-hillary/ Where Was Hillary?]. ''The American Spectator.'' Retrieved August 20, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Flynn, Daniel J. (November 15, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/15/hillary-clinton-screaming-obscenities-and-throwing-objects-in-election-night-meltdown/ Hillary Clinton Screaming Obscenities and Throwing Objects in Election Night Meltdown]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved November 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to a Secret Service agent, it was reported that &amp;quot;she began yelling, screaming obscenities, and pounding furniture. She picked up objects and threw them at attendants and staff. She was in an uncontrollable rage.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;HRCMeltdown&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Additionally, it was further reported that she became physical towards John Podesta and Robby Mook, needing to be restrained.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rusty (November 15, 2016). [http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/hillary-drunk-violent-meltdown-election-night/ Reports: Clinton Had a Violent Meltdown on Election Night]. ''The Political Insider''. Retrieved November 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This explains why she did not make a concession speech on election night, and why she delayed it the next morning multiple times.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wrdw.com/content/news/Clinton-calls-Trump-to-congratulate-him-on-victory--400515131.html UPDATE | Clinton campaign pushes back address one hour]. ''WRDW'' (with ''AP''). November 9, 2016. Retrieved November 20, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Strause, Jackie (November 9, 2016). [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/hillary-clinton-concession-speech-emotional-sorry-watch-945702 Hillary Clinton Delivers Emotional, Inspiring Concession Speech: &amp;quot;I'm Sorry&amp;quot;]. ''The Hollywood Reporter''. Retrieved November 20, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although Clinton had repeatedly claimed that Trump was too &amp;quot;temperamentally unfit&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Balakrishana, Anita (September 8, 2016). [https://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/08/hillary-clinton-press-conference.html Clinton: Trump is totally unqualified to be commander in chief]. ''CNBC''. Retrieved November 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or &amp;quot;irresponsible&amp;quot; to be president, this evidence, and others, shows otherwise.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RiddellHRCtemper&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Riddell, Kelly (May 23, 2016). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/may/23/hillary-clinton-hits-trump-temper-shes-no-picnic/ Hillary Clinton hits Trump on temper, but she's no picnic, either]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;UnruhHRCviolent&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Unruh, Bob (November 15, 2016). [https://www.wnd.com/2016/11/report-hillary-physically-violent-after-losing/ Report: Hillary 'physically violent' after losing]. ''WND''. Retrieved November 18, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After condemning Trump's pre-election refusal to accept election results regardless of outcome as a threat to democracy, Clinton donors funded a recount effort only in states Trump won which backfired and netted Trump a gain in popular vote totals. Wealthy donors who contributed over $1 billion to her campaign demanded an accounting for her loss, insisting without an independent, dispassionate review they could not be expected to continue contributing to the Democratic party in the future.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/hillary-clinton-campaign-donors-post-mortem-232715&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Clinton machine and Obama administrations responded by blaming [[Vladimir Putin]] and disgraced FBI Director James Comey for the loss rather than mismanagement and poor strategic planning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Anti-Trump violence and hate crimes ===&lt;br /&gt;
After the election, childish [[leftists]] and [[anarchists]], who could not accept the results of the election, strongly protested Trump's victory and committed outrageous and extreme acts of vandalism and violence.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Protests&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chiaramonte, Perry (November 10, 2016). [https://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/10/trump-protests-intensify-as-doubts-swirl-about-spontaneity.html Trump protests intensify, as doubts swirl about spontaneity]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Trump supporters were the victims of numerous targeted attacks, brutal violence, and [[hate crime]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/10/video-emerges-group-beating-chicago-man-while-yelling-dont-vote-trump.html Video emerges of mob beating Chicago man while yelling 'don't vote Trump']. ''Fox News''. November 10, 2016. Retrieved November 11, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2016/11/trump-supporter-15-beaten-during-rockville-protest/slide/1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A tech company corporate CEO threatened to murder Donald Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://bgr.com/2016/11/15/man-threatens-to-kill-trump-ceo-sniper/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The brutal and disturbing anti-Trump hate crimes (or hate crimes closely related to Trump's election) continued to occur into the next year.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LatestAntiTrump&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/05/facebook-live-attack-latest-in-string-anti-trump-assaults.html Facebook Live attack the latest in string of anti-Trump assaults]. ''Fox News''. January 5, 2017. Retrieved January 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Democrat leaders, Obama and the Clinton machine refused to condemn the hate and violence. Ads for paid protesters appeared on Craigslist. Many of these protests were likely organized and coordinated, as many protestors were bused in by Coach buses.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Protests&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite these attacks, liberals and leftists only focused on alleged attacks by Trump supporters against minorities and others (the false leftist narrative, although being blatantly false and one-sided, fits their manufactured narrative that Trump supporters are &amp;quot;racist&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;evil&amp;quot; and that leftists are &amp;quot;tolerant&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;forgiving&amp;quot;, despite the opposite being true). It was found that despite the number of real anti-Trump attacks, several of the &amp;quot;pro-Trump&amp;quot; attacks were found to be hoaxes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LatestAntiTrump&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The ''shattered'' Clinton campaign ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Tulsi-v-clinton-tweet.jpg|right|thumb|350px|Hillary Clinton rebooted her Vast Russian Conspiracy with an attack on [[Tulsi Gabbard]], a U.S. war hero.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton continued to blame &amp;quot;misogyny&amp;quot; (even from women) for her loss of the election, as well as supposed Russian meddling in the election, James Comey, and WikiLeaks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Breitman, Kendall (April 7, 2017). [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-explains-why-she-really-lost-trump-n743581 Hillary Clinton Explains Why She Really Lost to Trump]. ''NBC News''. Retrieved April 8, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kew, Ben (April 6, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2017/04/06/hillary-clinton-again-blames-misogyny-for-election-defeat/ Hillary Clinton Again Blames 'Misogyny' for Election Defeat]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 8, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2017, journalists Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes released the book ''Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign'' revealed that the Clinton campaign was a dysfunctional disaster and that numerous mistakes during the campaign contributed to her defeat.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adams, Becket; Weaver, Al (April 18, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/im-sorry-clinton-campaign-disaster-laid-bare-in-new-book/article/2620518 'I'm sorry': Clinton campaign disaster laid bare in new book]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Geraghty, Jim (April 19, 2017). [https://www.nationalreview.com/article/446885/shattered-jonathan-allen-amie-parnes-clinton-campaign-dysfunction-revealed Shattered Illusions]. ''National Review''. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kakutani, Michiko (April 17, 2017). [https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/17/books/shattered-charts-hillary-clintons-course-into-the-iceberg.html?_r=0 'Shattered' Charts Hillary Clinton's Course Into the Iceberg]. ''The New York Times''. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The book reveals that Clinton did not plan on conceding the election until Obama told her to do so.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/4-excerpts-from-shattered-and-what-they-tell-us-about-clintons-loss/ Takeaways from the Clinton campaign autopsy &amp;quot;Shattered&amp;quot;]. ''CBS News''. April 18, 2017. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The book also revealed that within 24 hours after her loss, the Clinton campaign, particularly [[John Podesta]] and [[Robby Mook]], developed the claim of alleged collusion between Trump and Russia to give to the public as the center reason for the loss.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hudson, Jerome (April 21, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/21/shattered-revelation-clinton-campaign-hatched-russian-hacking-narrative-24-hours-after-hillarys-loss/ 'Shattered' Revelation: Clinton Campaign Hatched Russian Hacking Narrative 24 Hours After Hillary's Loss]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Jonathan Allen &amp;amp; Amie Parnes (2017). ''[https://www.amazon.com/Shattered-Inside-Hillary-Clintons-Campaign/dp/0553447084 Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed Campaign]''. New York: Crown. ISBN 978-0553447088.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2017, former Democrat Vice President [[Joe Biden]] admitted, &amp;quot;I never thought [Clinton] was a great candidate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/19/biden-knocks-clinton-not-great-candidate.html Biden knocks Clinton: Not a 'great' candidate]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved May 19, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Clinton blamed nearly everything except herself for her election loss.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://insider.foxnews.com/2017/06/01/list-everyone-everything-hillary-clinton-has-blamed-loss-trump Here's a List of Everyone &amp;amp; Everything Hillary Has Blamed for Her Loss]. ''Fox News Insider''. June 1, 2017. Retrieved June 1, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Concha, Joe (September 13, 2017). [https://thehill.com/homenews/media/350404-foxs-guilfoyle-clinton-mad-at-everybody Fox's Guilfoyle: Clinton 'mad at everybody']. ''The Hill''. Retrieved September 13, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Giaritelli, Anna (September 13, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-my-own-mistakes-werent-enough-to-lose-the-election/article/2634237 Hillary Clinton: My own mistakes weren't enough to lose the election]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 13, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She blamed figures both on the Right and Left,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nelson, Louis (September 12, 2017). [https://www.politico.eu/article/hillary-clinton-book-memoir-12-times-dishes-out-payback-in-her-tell-all-book/ 12 times Clinton dishes out payback in her tell-all book]. ''Politico''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as well as Chief Justice [[John Roberts]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lovelace, Ryan (September 11, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-blames-chief-justice-john-roberts-for-contributing-to-her-election-loss-in-new-book/article/2634059 Hillary Clinton blames Chief Justice John Roberts for contributing to her election loss in new book]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; blue collar workers,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wegmann, Philip (September 12, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-writes-that-jd-vance-was-right-hillbillies-lost-me-my-election/article/2634117 Hillary Clinton writes that J.D. Vance was right. Hillbillies lost me my election]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and misogynist white women. In her 2017 book ''What Happened'', in which she blamed many of those people, Clinton effectively stated that authoritarianism can be started through the questioning of leaders,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adams, Becket (September 12, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clintons-funny-idea-of-authoritarianism/article/2634180 Hillary Clinton's funny idea of authoritarianism]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and she stated that all Democrats should vote in favor of abortion every time even if they are pro-life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berry, Susan (September 12, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/12/hillary-clinton-democrats-who-are-pro-life-must-vote-to-promote-abortion/ Hillary Clinton: Democrats Who Are Pro-Life Must Vote to Promote Abortion]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jashinsky, Emily (September 11, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-urges-democratic-party-to-adopt-litmus-test-on-abortion-in-new-book/article/2634060 Hillary Clinton urges Democratic Party to adopt litmus test on abortion in new book]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 12, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She blamed at least 27 different people or entities for her loss.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Starr, Penny (November 8, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/08/27-excuses-hillary-clinton-has-made-for-her-2016-election-loss/ 27 Excuses Hillary Clinton Has Made for Her 2016 Election Loss]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved November 8, 2017.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Adams, Becket (April 25, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/hillary-clinton-lost-and-shes-leaning-on-a-debunked-conspiracy-theory-to-explain-why https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/hillary-clinton-lost-and-shes-leaning-on-a-debunked-conspiracy-theory-to-explain-why]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved April 25, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By late 2019, when speculation was rife that she might enter the 2020 race because of the weak field, she still showed signs of not being over the emotional devastation of her 2016 loss. She was at that time blaming her loss on &amp;quot;these flashing videos that appear and then disappear and they’re on the dark web.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/hillary-clinton-blames-flashing-videos-that-appear-and-disappear-on-dark-web-for-her-2016-election-loss/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Later life ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Genesis 4 verse 6.jpg |right|350px |thumb |''Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?'' - Genesis 4:6]]&lt;br /&gt;
With the firing of FBI Director [[James Comey]] by President Trump, Clinton faced more [[legal]] problems in relation to pay-to-play schemes as [[Secretary of State]] and donations to the [[Clinton Foundation]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In October 2016 FBI director Comey reopened an investigation into Clinton due to substantiated suspicions that former Attorney General [[Loretta Lynch]] was covering for her.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (April 23, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/23/russians-hacked-democrats-plans-cheat-general-election/ The Russians Hacked Democrats' Plans to Cheat in the General Election, Too]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 23, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Comey revealed that Clinton had sent classified information to [[Anthony Weiner]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wong, Kristina (May 3, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/03/comey-defends-himself-says-makes-him-mildly-nauseous-to-think-he-affected-election/ Comey: Anthony Weiner Received Classified Clinton Emails]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of May 2017, Clinton planned on forming per own PAC and becoming a paid speaker.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berger, Judson (May 3, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/03/clinton-obama-return-to-public-eye-with-new-ventures.html Clinton, Obama return to public eye with new ventures]. ''Fox News''. May 3, 2017. Retrieved May 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; She created a PAC, called &amp;quot;Onward Together&amp;quot;, which intended to promote left-wing and [[Opposition to Donald Trump|anti-Trump]] causes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Weber, Joseph (May 18, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/18/clinton-pac-aims-to-boost-left-wing-anti-trump-groups-will-still-have-clout.html Clinton PAC aims to boost left-wing, anti-Trump groups – will she still have clout?] ''Fox News''. Retrieved May 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite criticizing Trump during the campaign for refusing to accept the election results as legitimate, Clinton did not rule out doing the same thing after the election.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yilek, Caitlin (September 18, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/hillary-clinton-wont-rule-out-questioning-legitimacy-of-presidential-election/article/2634777 Hillary Clinton won't rule out questioning legitimacy of presidential election]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2018, the Texas Board of Education voted to pull Clinton from the state's social studies curriculum.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Farber, Madeline (September 14, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/09/14/texas-board-ed-votes-to-pull-hillary-clinton-and-helen-keller-from-social-studies-curriculum.html Texas Board of Ed votes to pull Hillary Clinton and Helen Keller from social studies curriculum]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved September 15, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even at the funeral of Rep. [[Elijah Cummings]], Hillary Clinton could not restrain herself and made sickening comments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dmlnewsapp.com/video-tammy-bruce-slams-hillary-clinton-comments-elijah-cummings-funeral/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Americans were on lockdown and dying under the [[coronavirus]] attack, Hillary shamefully mocked and ridiculed their suffering.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/03/28/hillary-clinton-lambasted-for-disgusting-potshot-that-exploits-us-virus-tragedy-to-make-trump-look-bad-902211&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://100percentfedup.com/hillary-clinton-destroyed-for-attempt-at-snarky-humor-aimed-at-trump/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;You know, I'm going to start thanking the woman who cleans the restroom in the building I work in. I'm going to start thinking of her as a human being.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Case Against Hillary Clinton'', [[Peggy Noonan]], p. 55&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Clinton Cash]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Freedom of Choice Act]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obamagate timeline 2009-2015]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obamagate timeline|Obamagate timeline 2016 election year]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russiagate timeline 2017]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russiagate timeline|Russiagate timeline 2018]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Uranium One bribery scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benghazigate timeline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hillary Rodham Clinton facts]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hillary Rodham Clinton's net worth]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Hillary Rodham Clinton and Watergate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Dolly Kyle Browning]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Clinton scandal]]s&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Awan investigation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Sandy Berger]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Charles Schumer]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Honorarium]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FusionGPS]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marc Elias]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.hillaryclinton.com Hillary Rodham Clinton 2016 campaign website]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://foia.state.gov/Search/results.aspx?searchText=Clinton+Email&amp;amp;beginDate=&amp;amp;endDate=&amp;amp;publishedBeginDate=&amp;amp;publishedEndDate=&amp;amp;caseNumber= 12,173 declassified stolen Clinton emails recovered by State Department]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://foia.state.gov/Search/Results.aspx?collection=Clinton_Email 30,322 stolen Clinton emails recovered by State Department under the FOIA]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.rt.com/usa/complete-emails-guccifer-clinton-554/ Stolen Clinton emails recovered by Russian Television]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton Declassified FBI criminal investigation documents]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;rct=j&amp;amp;url=https://www.judicialwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/NARA-Whitewater-OIC-report-pg-17-38.pdf&amp;amp;ved=0ahUKEwiCmYSQuPLOAhUUT2MKHXvlDfIQFggeMAE&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFsX5z4OidXZMAJTkf5XsXn-B58QQ&amp;amp;sig2=2Uuf3pYqTlZPGjM2k11X6Q Summary of Evidence for Draft Indictment], Office of the Independent Counsel, 4/10/98&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.scribd.com/doc/229667084/State-of-Arkansas-V-Thomas-Alfred-Taylor State of Arkansas v Thomas Alfred Taylor]. Official record of Hillary Rodham Clinton's 1975 defense of a child rapist.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://akdart.com/lib136.html Hillary Clinton Scandals].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Deep State}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Globalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Clinton, Hillary Rodham}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hillary Clinton]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:First Ladies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Clinton Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Clinton Scandals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former United States Senators]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2008 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Cabinet]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Corruption]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Hypocrisy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Woman as destroyer]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Globalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States Secretaries of State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2016 Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2016 Presidential Election]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Failed Presidential Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Best Selling Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biden Putsch]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Soros Mercenaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Bigotry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1990s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2000s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2010s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2020s]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worst Liberal Politicians]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;diff=1733527</id>
		<title>Wikipedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;diff=1733527"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T23:53:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Wpp.png|thumb|right|200px|The multilingual Wikipedia home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Wikipedia''' is an [[internet|online]] [[wiki]]-based [[encyclopedia]] hosted and owned by the non-profit organization [[Wikimedia Foundation]] and financially supported by grants from left-leaning foundations plus an aggressive annual online fundraising drive.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20180527010133/http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_releases/Wikimedia_Foundation_announces_tenth_annual_fundraising_campaign&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Most of Wikipedia's articles can be edited publicly by both registered and anonymous editors,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://books.google.com/books?id=wMhBQ0WdjF4C&amp;amp;pg=PA199#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; mostly consisting of teenagers and the unemployed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;theregister.co.uk&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/18/sanger_forks_wikipedia/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As such, it tends to project a [[liberal]]—and, in some cases, even [[socialist]], [[Communist]], and [[Nazi]]-sympathising—worldview, which is totally at odds with [[conservative]] [[reality]] and rationality.{{Citation needed}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia was co-founded by [[Jimbo Wales]] (an [[Atheism|atheist]], [[libertarian]], and [[objectivist]]), and philosophy professor [[Larry Sanger]] in 2001.  The website was originally created to complement the now-defunct peer-reviewed online encyclopedia [[Nupedia]] as a way for collaboration on articles. However, Wikipedia overtook Nupedia and became an independent project hosted by the [[Wikimedia Foundation]], which also hosts various related websites, known as &amp;quot;sister projects&amp;quot;, such as ''Wikinews'' and ''Wikibooks''.  Co-founder Larry Sanger later acknowledged that Wikipedia does not follow its own neutrality policy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SangerNeutrality&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/larry-sanger-co-founder-of-wikipedia-agrees-that-it-does-not-follow-its-own-neutrality-policy/ Uncommon Descent, December 1, 2016, Posted by Barry Arrington]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of Wikipedia state that Wikipedia's articles contain [[Examples of bias in Wikipedia|systemic bias]],&amp;lt;ref name=howtheleft&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-swindle/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that the information included within its articles are a mixture of truths, [[half-truth]]s, and falsehoods.&amp;lt;ref name=hnn&amp;gt;http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/125437&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The nature of Wikipedia also makes it subject to spin and [[bias]], examples of which include paid public relations advocacy and inserting libelous content into the biographies of politicians for a political purpose.&amp;lt;ref name=hnn/&amp;gt; Wikipedia was also criticized for having a [[liberal bias]] in its articles about politics, despite Wikipedia's &amp;quot;neutral point of view&amp;quot; policy.&amp;lt;ref name=howtheleft/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their biased admins causes people to get blocked for little to no reason.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Continuing loss of influence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's traffic level stems from its high placement in Google searches, and that many people rely upon it for quick research regarding trivial facts.  However, users are turning to alternatives such as the voice-based iPhone application [[Siri]] or the Knowledge Graph display on Google search result pages of key facts about search targets.&amp;lt;ref name=timesindia&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/internet/Google-eating-into-Wikipedia-page-views/articleshow/29072825.cms?referral=PM|title=Google eating into Wikipedia page views?|work=Times of India|first=Subodh |last=Varma|date=January 20, 2014|accessdate=March 20, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia page-views dropped by 2 billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Wikipedia's most popular versions are leading the decline: page-views of the English Wikipedia dropped by 12 percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost 9 percent.&amp;lt;ref name=timesindia/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to the number of visitors declining, there continues to be a drop in active editors as well.  In August 2012, it was reported that Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/pro-evolution-wikipedia-has-shrinking.html Pro-evolution Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors plus [[Quora]] is Wikipedia's worst nightmare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the same time, ''Business Insider'' indicated [[Quora]] was &amp;quot;Wikipedia's worst nightmare&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/pro-evolution-wikipedia-has-shrinking.html Pro-evolution Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors plus Quora is Wikipedia's worst nightmare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unreliability of Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia relies on self-selected &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; to write and compile articles, with no preference given for scholars in the fields about which they are writing. This fact may disqualify Wikipedia from being considered a genuine encyclopedia, ironically even by its own standards. An encyclopedia is supposed to be a collection of articles by &amp;quot;well-educated, well-informed content experts.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Theoretically, Wikipedia is supposed to compensate for this weakness by requiring references to reputable secondary sources. But editors can delete, without collaboration, any text or entry they dislike, citing one of the many Wikipedia guidelines for doing so. Entries posted by scholars in the field, based on peer-reviewed, academic articles are deleted by editors with an ideological bias. Wikipedia, then, only represents the majority view of its editors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the contribution of volunteer editors has declined, some of the void has been replaced by paid public relations professionals.  These paid editors seek to present their client companies or individuals in the best possible light.  This has resulted in many articles being transformed into paid advertising pieces that take advantage of the English Wikipedia's high placement on Google search results.  This chronic problem has become so severe that the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed amending its terms of service to require disclosures of paid editing conflicts of interest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use/Paid_contributions_amendment|title=Terms of use/Paid contributions amendment|date=February 21, 2014|accessdate=March 20, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the competition to control content, the paid PR editors win out because they are monitoring pages as a full-time job, while editors seeking to keep content more balanced are only part-time volunteers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the ''American Journalism Review'' declared concerning Wikipedia:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;An even more blunt assessment appears in the encyclopedia's &amp;quot;Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia&amp;quot; posting: &amp;quot;We do not expect you to trust us. It is in the nature of an ever-changing work like Wikipedia that, while some articles are of the highest quality of scholarship, others are admittedly complete rubbish.&amp;quot; It also reminds users not to use Wikipedia as a primary source or for making &amp;quot;critical decisions.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Despite its official &amp;quot;neutrality policy,&amp;quot; [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia|Wikipedia has a strong liberal bias.]] In an article entitled &amp;quot;Wikipedia Lies, Slander Continue,&amp;quot; [[journalism|journalist]] [[Joseph Farah]] stated Wikipedia &amp;quot;is not only a provider of inaccuracy and bias. It is a wholesale purveyor of lies and slander unlike any other the world has ever known.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wnd.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=83640&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Mr. Farah has repeatedly been the victim of defamation on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wnd.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  In December 2010, [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[JP Holding]] called Wikipedia &amp;quot;the abomination that causes misinformation&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://tektonticker.blogspot.com/search/label/Wikipedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some say that Wikipedia's unreliability is systemic, citing Douglas Adams: &amp;quot;''In other words—and this is the rock-solid principle on which the whole of the Corporation’s Galaxywide success is founded—their fundamental design flaws are completely hidden by their superficial design flaws.'' Wikipedia, which is written by anyone, still struggles to solve the need for traditional quality controls characteristic of conventional [[encyclopedia]]s. The self-policing practices have produced results and accuracy some claim is far better than originally expected but still widely questioned. Research released in April 2012 claimed 60% of Wikipedia articles contain &amp;quot;inaccuracies&amp;quot;, leading the ''[[Daily Mail]]'' to dub it &amp;quot;Iffy-Pedia&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2131458/Up-articles-Wikipedia-contain-factual-errors.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The lack of consistency and uniform supervision leaves an ever-present shadow over any given piece of information. Many in the [[College|academy]] insist that it is an unreliable source for [[research]] and an unacceptable reference in many classrooms. However, Wikipedia steers people to original [[Source|source material]], and with the use of hyperlinks and [[search engine]]s, it has become the most widely used intermediary reference tool on the [[Internet]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the style manual for the [[Associated Press]], the largest news agency in the United States, Wikipedia should not be used as a primary source, but the hyperlinks in articles may be helpful as sources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia has millions of entries on trivia and mundane topics ranging from an explanation for &amp;quot;duh&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duh (only after Conservapedia criticized the entry on the English word &amp;quot;duh&amp;quot; did Wikipedia eventually remove it)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to singles by obscure rock bands&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honk_If_You_Love_Fred_Durst Honk If You Love Fred Durst]'' (accessed April 1, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to arcane British nobility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Part of the article about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Liddell Henry Liddell], a 19th-century Vice-chancellor of Oxford University and author, includes that his grandfather was the youngest son of the 8th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, and that his daughter was the child ''Alice in Wonderland'' was written for (accessed April 1, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There are editions of Wikipedia in 250 languages, and 130 have more than 1000 articles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias List of Wikipedias - Wikimedia], accessed April 1, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After about four years Wikipedia had about 450,000 entries,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aaron Weiss, The Unassociated Press, N.Y. Times, Feb. 10, 2005, at G5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and after six years it had about 1.7 million entries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics English Wikipedia statistics] accessed April 1, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Four years later this number had more than doubled again: in November 2011, there were more than 3.8 million content pages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics English Wikipedia statistics] accessed May 6, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As of February 2014, there are more than 4.4 million &amp;quot;content&amp;quot; pages, many of which lack educational value. On important topics, the information is often misleading due to the unchecked, [[Wikipedia#Leftist bias|systematic liberal bias]] that dominates Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of Wikipedia articles can vary greatly.  Some articles, particularly about narrow topics and those of little interest, are well written and appear to have input from one or more subject matter experts.  Articles about broader topics and with high viewership naturally have more editors, many of whom are not well versed in the subject matter.  In determining the quality of an article it is helpful to check the sources or references to see if one or more of the standard references for the topic is frequently cited.  Often the most valuable feature of an article will be to direct the reader to good quality references, if they exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Origins==&lt;br /&gt;
Initially, Wikipedia was hosted on servers operated by Bomis, Inc., a company that also sold pornographic pictures.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Martin Hickman and Genevieve Roberts, &amp;quot;WIKIPEDIA,&amp;quot; The Independent (London) p. 12 (Feb 13, 2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The majority owner of Bomis had lost his fortune in a lawsuit, and the Wikipedia volunteers feared that if all of Bomis' assets were seized, ownership of Wikipedia would be transferred.  In 2003, Jimbo Wales addressed this risk by founding the Wikimedia Foundation to take control of Wikipedia's assets. The Wikimedia Foundation is a non-profit organization that provides support for Wikipedia and other similar projects,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home Wikimedia Foundation] accessed April 7, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and also the free MediaWiki software that runs Wikipedia and Conservapedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki home] accessed April 7, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It also gives out millions of dollars in grants each year to liberal causes that recruit liberals to edit Wikipedia so as to reflect their biases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leftist bias ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Leftist roots of Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia shows a systematic bias in the proportion of articles which treat controversial issues.  It ignores its own [[NPOV]] policy when it allows contributors to &amp;quot;delete well-referenced information&amp;quot; merely because it comes from a [[scientist]] who holds a minority view. It would only be a violation, if the article used the information to give a false impression of the proportion of scientists adhering to that view, but liberals use &amp;quot;undue weight&amp;quot; like a sledge hammer. They are either unaware or unconcerned about their bias.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not surprising, given this [[Zogby]] poll:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While 97% of [[Republican]]s surveyed said the media are [[liberal]], two-thirds of [[political independent]]s feel the same, but fewer than one in four independents (23%) said they saw a &amp;quot;conservative bias&amp;quot;. [[Democrat]]s, while much more likely to perceive a conservative bias than other groups, were not nearly as sure the [[media]] was against them as were the Republicans. While Republicans were unified in their perception of a [[left-wing]] media, just two-thirds of Democrats were certain the media skewed [[right-wing|right]] – and 17% said the bias favored the left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1262&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
David Swindle writes at [[FrontPage Magazine]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There was not a single ideological vision driving Wikipedia’s founders and core contributors as they launched the project. Jimmy Wales, who would become the face of the project and its “benevolent dictator,” according to Andrew Lih’s ''The Wikipedia Revolution​'', is a libertarian and [[Ayn Rand|Ayn Rand​ian]] [[Objectivism|Objectivist]]. Also important in shaping Wikipedia was the so-called “hacker ethos,” the culture that has developed amongst computer programmers over the last 40 years and been shaped by the Left, the counterculture, popular culture, and [[anarchism|anarchist]] thought.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What binds together these ideologies is a [[utopia]]n ideal that human beings are more prone to [[altruism]] rather than self-interest. In Wikipedia Revolution Wales is quoted as saying, “Generally we find most people out there on the internet are good… It’s one of the wonderful humanitarian discoveries in Wikipedia, that most people only want to help us and build this free nonprofit, charitable resource.” Ward Cunningham was the programmer who created the wiki concept and software. According to Lih, he believed in the Wiki because “People are generally good.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lih explains how this philosophy is embedded within Wikipedia’s rules:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A core idea Wikipedia embraced.. was to assume good faith when interacting with others. The guideline promoted optimistic production rather than pessimistic nay-saying, and reads, “Unless there is strong evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it; avoid accusing others of harmful motives without particularly strong evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as it worked out, Wikipedia in practice has strayed from these utopian ideas because of the ease with which political and social bias trumps altruism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After almost a decade of rapid growth and free-wheeling experimentation the situation at the site by the Summer of 2009 was chaos. Political operatives would sabotage one another in electoral contests by vandalizing pages. More malicious misinformation filtered in freely, with living historical figures accused of involvement in conspiratorial plots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/23/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia co-founder [[Larry Sanger]], who left the site, later acknowledged that Wikipedia does not follow its own neutrality policy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SangerNeutrality&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Peter-Singer.jpg|right|thumbnail|250px|The atheist philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of [[bestiality]] (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the [[liberal]] and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  See: [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Wikipedia on bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia also has an automatic Wikimedia Commons editing software called &amp;quot;Commonist,&amp;quot; which allows the user to upload multiple files at once.  The symbol of [[communism]] - the &amp;quot;hammer and sickle&amp;quot; of the leftist ideology which murdered millions in the former [[Soviet Union]] - is featured prominently on the instruction page as well as the tags that mark each uploaded image.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Commonist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 23, 2011, David Swindle published an article at ''[[FrontPage Magazine]]'' detailing how Wikipedia has been taken over by the [[Leftist|political left]] and he cited statistics relating to Wikipedia's articles on [[Anne Coulter]], [[Michael Moore]], [[Glenn Beck]] and [[Keith Olbermann]] which helped demonstrate the Wikipedia has a leftist/liberal bias plus he discussed the liberal/leftist cultural foundations of Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/23/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/ How the left conquered Wikipedia - Part 1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, Swindle wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Consider Ann Coulter versus Michael Moore​. Coulter’s entry (on August 9, 2011) was 9028 words long.* Of this longer-than-usual entry, 3220 words were devoted to “Controversies and criticism” in which a series of incidents involving Coulter and quotes from her are cited with accompanying condemnations, primarily from her opponents on the Left. That’s 35.6 percent of Coulter’s entry devoted to making her look bad. By contrast, Moore’s entry is 2876 words (the more standard length for entries on political commentators), with 130 devoted to “Controversy.” That’s 4.5% of the word count, a fraction of Coulter’s. Does this mean that an “unbiased” commentator would find Coulter eight times as “controversial” as Moore?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Talk Pages ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of Wikipedia's leftist bias is clearly evident from their talk pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, when an article about the Barcelona May Days&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:May_Days&amp;amp;oldid=903699178&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an event during the Spanish Civil War where hundreds of anti-Stalinist Trotskyists and anarchists were gunned down by the pro-Stalin Republican government) portrayed the anti-Stalinist side, which contained author George Orwell, in a generally favourable light, Stalinists filled the talk page with childish attacks on the authors of the article, including expletives, as is characteristic of Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Purported &amp;quot;Tertiary&amp;quot; Source and Arbitrary Standards==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia purports to be a &amp;quot;tertiary&amp;quot; source, relying on edited work from reputable sources. The policy is meant to build on the work of qualified editors of secondary sources. Some accuse Wikipedia, therefore, of relying on [[hearsay]], and discouraging the application of [[logic]] and new development of new insights. The result is an agglomeration of reheated &amp;quot;consensus&amp;quot; with little or no intellectual merit of its own; in particular, it is impossible to challenge orthodoxy, received wisdom or commonly held misconceptions through the Wikipedia system, no matter how factually incorrect those orthodoxies might be. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supporters of Wikipedia would claim that relying on secondary sources encourages reliability and objectivity. However, there are cases of Wikipedia applying it's standards arbitrarily. For example, the case of Wikipedia editor &amp;quot;Yeoberry&amp;quot; (user ID 3606936), an editor with a Ph.D. in church history who first posted materials about &amp;quot;Icons&amp;quot; on August 6, 2012, with multiple citations to historical documents. The material was removed and Yeoberry was told that Wikipedia is a &amp;quot;tertiary&amp;quot; source and so he needed to find reliable secondary sources. On April 4, 2013, Yeoberry again added largely the same material, this time citing a newly published academic paper in a peer-reviewed journal. The information was again removed, with editors, at least some of whom religiously affiliated with the organization supporting icons, claiming the editor had a &amp;quot;COI&amp;quot; (conflict of interest). Neither time did the editors removing Yeoberry's material consult Yeoberry. But when Yeoberry reverted to his edition, he was charged with &amp;quot;edit warring.&amp;quot; When Yeoberry challenged the arbitrary use of Wikipedia criteria he was blocked from editing indefinitely and then his access to his own talk page was also blocked.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;amp;oldid=548948980#Proposal:_Indefinite_Block&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia articles, especially on controversial or political and religious topics, are often guarded by editors who have an interest in slanting the content of the article, may have no formal education on the topic, and can find a so-called reason for suppressing the information they want to suppress. Editors can claim the source is unreliable (as they interpret that); that information gives &amp;quot;UNDUE&amp;quot; weight to the topic the information is about; peer-reviewed, academic articles written by scholars can be removed by editors if, in the opinion of an editor, the view expressed is &amp;quot;Fringe&amp;quot; or if the contributor has a &amp;quot;COI&amp;quot; (conflict of interest) if he's the author of the secondary source or has an advanced education or other interest in the topic; etc. Editors with advanced education in a topic, citing sources from peer-reviewed journals, can have their contributions deleted and their participation prohibited if a few other editors, without such qualification but with enough knowledge of the Wikipedia jargon, decide to suppress him or her. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally, encyclopedias were written by scholars, either by one or a few whose knowledge is considered &amp;quot;encyclopedic&amp;quot; (i.e. very broad) or each article is written by an expert in the field. But in Wikipedia, expertise in a given field can disqualify one from contributing in that field resulting in Wikipedia being accused of being a &amp;quot;[[idiocracy]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Wikipedia is non-profit, the [[Wikia]] project of its co-founder is very much for-profit and has raised millions of dollars in [[venture capital]]. Already Wikipedia has been criticized for favoring Wikia. When Wikipedia community voted 61-39% percent to treat all links to other sites equally by removing nofollow (Google-ignored) tags for all of them, the Wikipedia co-founder overruled this decision and Wikipedia now favors Wikia in its treatment of nofollow tags.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/28/wikipedia-special-treatment-for-wikia-and-other-wikis/|title=Wikipedia: Special Treatment for Wikia and some other Wikis|author=Nik Cubrilovic|date=April 28, 2007|accessdate=July 22, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-January/061137.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The Register'' said:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;theregister.co.uk&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Wikipedia has tried to balance the Utopian goal of &amp;quot;an encyclopedia anyone can edit&amp;quot; with the more utilitarian goal of &amp;quot;a website anyone would want to read&amp;quot;. With over a million articles, and a rulebook almost as dense, Wikipedia has demonstrated an insatiable desire to participate, create lists and generate procedures. The result is a huge silo of recorded trivia, and perhaps the world's largest, most distributed bureaucracy - mostly manned by a casual staff of teenagers and the unemployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the past few years, Wikipedia has added banners begging for money from its viewers. The site claims to be in need of more funding, but in fact it is &amp;quot;awash with cash - and raises far more money each year than it needs to keep operating.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/20/cash_rich_wikipedia_chugging/ Wikipedia doesn't need your money - so why does it keep pestering you?], 20 December 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia, a registered trademark of Wikimedia Foundation, is used also by services like WikiExperts.us, which is declared as not being affiliated with it.&lt;br /&gt;
WikiExperts.us accepts money to write Wikipedia entries for businesses and is included in American business ventures of Alex Konanykhin, the Former Russian oligarch, who has been wanted in Russia since Yeltsin's days to face charges relating to embezzlement and financial fraud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title='Not terrorists': Hysteria over MH17 fails to take account of both law and facts |author=Roslyn Fuller |date=July 25, 2014 |accessdate=July 26, 2014 |url=http://rt.com/op-edge/175496-hysteria-mh17-ukraine-facts-terrorists/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scandals and decline==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wikipedia scandals.jpg|thumb|450px|right|Decline in Wikimedia Foundation donations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://centiare.com/Wikipedia_scandals Wikipedia scandals]. Retrieved from centiare.com October 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Graph courtesy [http://www.centiare.com/Directory:Gregory_J._Kohs Gregory Kohs].  Used with Permission.]]The cumulative effect of multiple scandals and revelations has led to declining activity on the English Wikipedia. The rate of new account creation peaked in early 2007 and has declined ~30% since.  Overall editing activity showed a steady decline beginning in February 2007. An independent analysis reported, &amp;quot;The rate at which edits were being made to Wikipedia articles appears to have peaked in February to April 2007 and declined since. This decline is unprecedented in Wikipedia's history.... Though it may be purely coincidental, this time frame also corresponds to the Essjay controversy appearing in the press.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2007-October/033661.html Statistical Decline of the English Wikipedia], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dragons_flight/Log_analysis Dragons flight/Log analysis], October 9, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even after the hoax was revealed of high level intimates promoted by the Wikimedia Foundation as experts in fields that they were not, to persuade college professors to allow students to cite Wikipedia as a reliable source, and entrusted with the ability to invade users privacy which could affect, in their words, &amp;quot;life and death,&amp;quot; Wikipedia still appealed to students with a Jim and Tammy Faye Baker-style fundraising slogan across one million project space pages that read, &amp;quot;OMG! Wikipedia is gone! I’ll flunk my exams!&amp;quot; [http://whygive.wikimedia.org/2007/11/24/omg-wikipedia-is-gone-ill-flunk-my-exams/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further evidence of the decline in Wikipedia is that the number of editors who voted in the 2012 Arbitration Committee elections has dropped to 858.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2012#Turnout|title=Arbitration Commitee Elections December 2012|accessdate=December 18, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For a website that claims to have thousands of active editors, this is very low.  Active editors are discouraged from voting because all voters are subject to automatic investigation and invasion of their privacy to determine if they are &amp;quot;sockpuppets&amp;quot; of other voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://archive.is/6tiF8|title=Wikipedia's &amp;quot;scrutineers&amp;quot; snoop on living arrangements of contributors|work=Examiner|first=Greg|last=Kohs|date=December 11, 2013|accessdate=December 15, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shane Fitzgerald Hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the death of composer Maurice Jarre, a Wikipedia editor named Shane Fitzgerald attached a quote to Jarre's page: &amp;quot;One could say my life itself has been one long soundtrack. Music was my life, music brought me to life, and music is how I will be remembered long after I leave this life. When I die there will be a final waltz playing in my head, that only I can hear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hoaxes.org/archive/permalink/the_maurice_jarre_wikipedia_hoax/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The words are poetic, yet were never spoken by Jarre, and meant to appeal to news journalists seeking information.  It was cited in many newspapers as a genuine quote before its removal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/id/30699302/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/student-hoaxes-worlds-media-wikipedia/#.WLNTW5ArLrc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Had Fitzgerald not confessed to the lie and informed major newspapers, it is likely that the quote would have been cited to one of them.  In the days following, only one newspaper (''[[The Guardian]]'') publicly apologized for the use of a source that can be a tool for duping the public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/may/04/journalism-obituaries-shane-fitzgerald&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other newspapers, such as the [[Washington Post]], simply deleted their articles from online archives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==False claim about Brent Bozell==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2007, [[Brent Bozell]] described this falsehood in Wikipedia:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.mrc.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2007/col20070320.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The other day, [[Bernie Goldberg]] emailed me, upset. He pointed me to his Wikipedia entry. To read what was written was to conclude that apparently I must hate his guts. But we are friends. He is a man for whom I have profound respect, professional and personal. He knew there was foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right there on the screen, under the heading &amp;quot;Criticism,&amp;quot; it stated that I had attacked him, &amp;quot;claiming that Goldberg merely lifted material he had been producing for years, and only published the book because he had an ax to grind with his former employers and was attempting to make a 'quick buck,' noting that Goldberg never mentioned the alleged liberal bias of the media until it was 'convenient' and 'profitable' for him to do so.&amp;quot;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In fact, those words have never been uttered by me. The accusation would be false. Back in 1996, Goldberg used the op-ed pages of ''The Wall Street Journal'' publicly to castigate his own network for its one-sided oafish bashing of [[Steve Forbes]].  It was anything but &amp;quot;convenient&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;profitable&amp;quot; for him. It ruined his friendship with [[Dan Rather]] and put him on a path to the outer fringes of CBS News. Ultimately, it ruined his newscaster career.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My attorney contacted Wikipedia by email demanding the removal of this false entry. No response. So we edited out the offensive material ourselves, after which in writing counsel alerted Wikipedia to the legal action that might befall them should this be repeated. Here's full disclosure, Wikipedia-style: You can see how each article is altered, sometimes hour by hour, in its &amp;quot;History&amp;quot; section. But there is no mention of the attorney's complaints. In the Goldberg article's history, an editor simply now scolds: &amp;quot;Bozell's article is a mock-jealous swipe at Goldberg's opportunism. PLEASE REREAD IT.&amp;quot; (Capitals theirs.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Goldberg and I are not alone. The website Conservapedia.com has a [[Bias in Wikipedia|long list]] of 41 allegations of bias and factual errors at Wikipedia. You can add to that the problem with the credentials of its staff. One of its editors, named only &amp;quot;Essjay&amp;quot; online and described on his user profile &amp;quot;as a tenured professor of religion at a private university with expertise in canon law,&amp;quot; was recently exposed as a 24-year-old college kid in Kentucky. He resigned in disgrace — even though Wikipedia tried to retain him, claiming he'd edited thousands of articles with flair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of apologizing to Brent Bozell, '''Wikipedia instead says &amp;quot;Bozell points to Conservapedia as a resource that documents Wikipedia's faults in this regard, presumably holding it as a more authoritative reference less vulnerable to vandalism.&amp;quot;'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brent_Bozell accessed April 1, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rewriting its own history==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Associated Press and others credit Larry Sanger as the co-founder of Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/tech/2007/mar/25/032502465.html&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But the Associated Press quotes Jimmy Wales as denying it:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;When you write this up please do not uncritically repeat Sanger's absurd claim to be the co-founder of Wikipedia.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I know of no one who was there at the company at the beginning who would think it anything other than laughable,&amp;quot; he added. This is an interesting comment, considering that Larry Sanger takes credit for coining the name, &amp;quot;Wikipedia.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_20#Sorry.2C_Jimbo.2C_but_not_buying_it. User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 20, Larry Sanger 03:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I am not bent out of shape about it,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;quot;The facts are on my side, which is why I bother so little about it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Associated Press, Jimmy Wales &amp;quot;has repeatedly tried to address this - even going so far as editing his own Wikipedia biography to tone down credit for Sanger. Such autobiographical contributions are frowned upon in Wikipedia's community, and Wales apologized after his changes were noticed and publicized by blogger Rogers Cadenhead in 2005.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wales' booking agent for speaking engagements claims that Wales is &amp;quot;the founder&amp;quot; of Wikipedia, which results in surprised clients when that claim is challenged. The false &amp;quot;founder&amp;quot; claim is on Wales' webpage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://jimmywales.com/about-jimmy/|title=About Jimmy|accessdate=February 6, 2015}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jimmy Wales has admitted that certain administrators, contrary to their own rules, have at times completely removed editing evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Seigenthaler scandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In early October 2005, a prominent and respected journalist [[John Seigenthaler Sr.]], contacted Wikipedia founder [[Jimmy Wales]] about false and libelous content in his biographical entry.  Essjay, a 24-year-old Wikipedia Administrator who was advancing rapidly in the organization, was dispatched to handle the situation.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;User:Essjay/Letter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=User:Essjay/Letter User:Essjay/Letter].  Retrieved from WikiTruth, November 3, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An anonymous contributor added to Seigenthaler's biography the previous May,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;John Seigenthaler Sr. was the assistant to Attorney General [[Robert Kennedy]] in the early 1960s. For a short time, he was thought to have been directly involved in the Kennedy assassinations of both [[John F. Kennedy|John]], and his brother, Bobby. Nothing was ever proven,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;John Seigenthaler moved to the [[Soviet Union]] in 1971, and returned to the [[United States]] in 1984. He started one of the country's largest public relations firms shortly thereafter.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales told Seigenthaler that Wikipedia is &amp;quot;accountable&amp;quot; and corrects mistakes immediately, but that the internet service provider of the anonymous user probably would not be helpful in identifying who placed the content.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Seigenthaler's Op-Eds&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.journalism.org/node/1673 Seigenthaler's Op-Eds], October 1, 2005.  Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org November 12, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Accountability activist [[Daniel Brandt]], a victim of a spurious biographical entry by Wikipedia Administrators, identified the place of employment of the anonymous user, and from there the person accountable was identified.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journalism.cf.ac.uk/2006/online/index.php?id=parse-195-0-0-251&amp;amp;article=336&amp;amp;author=India+Camm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler returned to the editorial pages of ''USA Today'' from which he retired as its first editorial manager to write an Op-Ed piece critical of Wikipedia and the threat it poses to free speech due of its overt provocation of government regulation, its irresponsible self-regulation and lack of accountability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm A false Wikipedia 'biography'], By John Seigenthaler, ''USA Today'', 11/29/2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== CNN interview ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 5, 2005 Wales and Seigenthaler appeared on [[CNN]]. An exchange between CNN moderator [[Kyra Phillips]] and Wales went like this:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|PHILLIPS:...I ran my name. I was shocked to see what was under my name. ...I'm telling you right now, Jimmy, that's not how I want people to see me and understand me. And what I'm about, and what I write about in my interviews, ''et cetera''. So, you know, it's not just individuals like John, but me and many other people, that just have concerns that this is creating gossip that can be very harmful. And people go to these sites thinking that this is the truth.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|WALES: Well, I mean, I think the real key is that the site matures over time, the -- all of the articles are edited over and over and over, and improved. Anyone's free to contribute. You're free to go and contribute.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This in fact is not the case.  Phillips was not free to remove objectionable content within her biographical entry, as Daniel Brandt at that exact moment was discovering.  Not four days prior, Wales told ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' magazine regarding Brandt's objections to a false Wikipedia biography created by Wikipedia Administrators about him, &amp;quot;I find it hard to take him very seriously at all,&amp;quot; and libelous slanders remained in Brandt's biography for a year and half. Wales told CNN, &amp;quot;we are very, very responsive to complaints and concerns.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler told the audience &amp;quot;with accountability comes credibility&amp;quot; and expressed fear that, &amp;quot;I'm afraid we're going to get regulated media as a result.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0512/05/lol.02.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 9, Seigenthaler appeared on C-SPAN's ''Washington Journal'' with Brian Lamb and articulated his concern that members of Congress or other powerful figures in government may likewise be targeted.  On November 2, 2006, days before the mid-term Congressional elections, an anonymous IP address traced to the ''[[New York Times]]'' changed [[U.S. House of Representatives]] [[Majority Leader]] [[Tom DeLay]]'s Wikipedia biographical entry from &amp;quot;a prominent member of the [[Republican Party]]&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Grand Dragon of the Republican Party.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tom_DeLay&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=85320018 Wikipedia/Tom DeLay, Revision as of 20:19, 2 November 2006, IP 199.181.174.146]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/name2ip.php?orgname=New+York+Times&amp;amp;location= WikiScanner]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler wrote a more expansive column in the ''The Tennessean'' after the November 30 ''USA Today'' piece appeared, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|a sudden stream of invective — homophobic, anti-Semitic and racist — spilled, as if from a sewer, onto the Wikipedia page under my name. ..It identified me as ...a &amp;quot;Nazi,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;fascist-oriented&amp;quot; ....murderer ...there also was the profile picture of Adolf Hitler over the caption, &amp;quot;Press photo of Seigenthaler.&amp;quot; The accompanying line: &amp;quot;He is secretly responsible for killing all the Jews.&amp;quot; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accountability and Section 230 ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wikifascists.JPG|thumb|275px|right|From Wikipedia Watch. [http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/] The inscription reads,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ''&amp;quot;Two wikifascists find someone without a biography.&amp;quot;'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Upon his retirement from ''USA Today'', Seigenthaler founded the First Amendment Center, an organization dedicated to a national dialogue about [[First Amendment]] rights and values. Seigenthaler criticized passage of [[Section 230]] of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Section 230 states that &amp;quot;no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker.&amp;quot; Unlike print and broadcast companies, internet service providers (ISP's) cannot be sued for disseminating defamatory attacks on citizens posted by others. Seigenthaler noted [[Jimbo Wales]] told [[Brian Lamb]] in a  [[C-SPAN]] interview that Wikipedia is accountable and that mistakes are corrected within minutes, but the false information remained in Seigenthaler's biography for five months. Seigenthaler concluded, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|And so we live in a universe of new media with phenomenal opportunities for worldwide communications and research — but populated by volunteer vandals with poison-pen intellects.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A false Wikipedia 'biography', By John Seigenthaler, ''USA Today'', 11/29/2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of ''Zeran v. AOL'', Zeran sued AOL for refusing to screen and remove defamatory messages, even after Zeran notified the ISP of their existence. The lower court ruled for the service provider and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the decision, noting that the intent of Section 230 was to (1) remove incentives on service providers to restrict speech on the Internet and (2) encourage self-regulation by service providers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=916529&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adl.org/Civil_Rights/newcyber.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An American citizen who posts material on the Internet that is illegal in a foreign country could be prosecuted if he subjected himself to the jurisdiction of that country. Internet users who export material that is illegal, that is to say, post material that is accessible and illegal in some foreign countries may be subject to prosecution in that country. However, under American law, the United States will not extradite a person for engaging in a constitutionally protected activity even if that activity violates a criminal law elsewhere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rjayco.com/obrien/nazism.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Essjay given oversight ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See Main article: [[Wikipedia:The Essjay scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Essjay wrote a professor to persuade her to allow her students to use Wikipedia as a viable source of information and posted a verbatim copy of the email for others to use.  Essjay stated, &amp;quot;I was the administrator who deleted the inappropriate revisions when Mr. Seigenthaler contacted our founder, [[Jimmy Wales]]; it is quite unfortunate that a relatively minor issue on a relatively minor figure has provided so much negative publicity.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;User:Essjay/Letter&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Seigenthaler noted in his Op-Ed piece, &amp;quot;The motive for the salacious stuff directed at me is reasonably obvious,&amp;quot; and quoted some comments, &amp;quot;We all at Wikipedia think he (Seigenthaler) is a horrible, stupid p...k for complaining about small inaccuracies in his biography.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Seigenthaler's Op-Eds&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others said, &amp;quot;Mr. Seigenthaler's attitude and actions are reprehensible and ill-formed,&amp;quot; and “if there is an error whether large or small, he can correct it.”  This again, was not true.  Even prior to the Wikipedia policy, '''Biographies of Living Persons''', [[conflict of interest]] restrictions existed on the subject of an article editing their own entry. Another wrote: &amp;quot;Rather than fixing the article himself, he made a legal threat.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/02/12/bias_sabotage_haunt_wikipedias_free_world/?page=3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Seigraph.gif|400px|thumb|right|The Seigenthaler scandal was viewed as &amp;quot;the best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia&amp;quot; as curiosity seekers to view the [[misinformation]] skyrocketed Alexa rankings.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the damage to an innocent person and divulgence of Wikipedia's precarious claim as a viable source, the Seigenthaler scandal was viewed as a triumph and considered &amp;quot;the best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Seigenthaler,_Sr.#The_best_thing_that_ever_happened_to_Wikipedia Talk:John Seigenthaler Sr.#The best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia], retrieved 23 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; catapulting it into a top ten most visited website as curiosity seekers responded to the negative publicity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikipediareview.com/lofiversion/index.php?t1100.html Wikipedia: A Nightmare Of Libel and Slander], Joel Leyden, Israel News Agency, 8 May 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scandal was originally billed as a &amp;quot;hoax&amp;quot;, then &amp;quot;controversy,&amp;quot; then downgraded to &amp;quot;incident,&amp;quot; and now re-upgraded to &amp;quot;controversy,&amp;quot; evidently in response to criticism.  The Wikipedia entry on &amp;quot;Seigenthaler controversy&amp;quot; contains [[disinformation]], making the claim, &amp;quot;After the incident, Wikipedia took steps to prevent a recurrence, including barring unregistered users from creating new pages.&amp;quot;  No actions were ever taken to require disclosure of the real life identities of contributors.  Barring unregistered users from creating new pages had nothing to do with the Seigenthaler scandal—the page already existed when an anonymous IP added the false information.  Registration of accounts requires no accountability of the real life identity of the contributor.  Indeed, many experienced Wikipedia editors and Administrators have dozens of registered accounts, called &amp;quot;sockpuppet accounts.&amp;quot;  Protecting the identities of anonymous high-level Administrators has always been more of a priority to the WikiMedia Foundation than the propagation of false information about real life persons whose identities are known.  Wales was asked by ''BusinessWeek'' magazine, “Why do you feel it is important to allow contributors and site administrators to remain anonymous?” Wales responded, “there are definitely people working in Wikipedia who may have privacy reasons for not wanting their name on the site….there are lots of reasons for privacy online that aren’t nefarious.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2005/tc20051214_441708.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the Seigenthaler case, it was the odd circumstance that a victim of false information had a large enough platform to respond, coupled with the welcome fact that the victim fundamentally opposes government regulation of internet speech.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's &amp;quot;Seigenthaler controversy&amp;quot; also states, &amp;quot;The Foundation added a new level of &amp;quot;oversight&amp;quot; features to the MediaWiki software,[12] accessible as of 2006 to around 20 experienced editors nominated by Wales,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler_Sr._Wikipedia_biography_controversy#Wikimedia_Foundation_reaction Seigenthaler controversy#Wikimedia Foundation reaction].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; one of whom was Essjay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ban on anonymous page creation “reform” was abandoned less than two years later as Wikipedia's usage and ratings slumped in the wake of yet more scandals and questions about Wikipedia's culture, core content policies, and endemic lack of accountability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/084292.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brandt / Berlet feud==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See Main article: [[Wikipedia:The Daniel Brandt controversy]]&lt;br /&gt;
An ugly [[far-left]] sectarian dispute&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://spencer.lib.ku.edu/exhibits/wilcox/5.html Laird Wilcox], ''The Watchdogs: A Close Look at Anti-Racist &amp;quot;Watchdog&amp;quot; Groups'', Second Edition, Part 2, Editorial Research Service, 1999, p. 21. ISBN 0-993592-96-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; reared its head in 2005 with disastrous consequences for the site's credibility. The feud had been dormant for many years until the need to elevate a “controversial and notable expert” above the level of “partisan and extreme” defined by its own policies became apparent which would have precluded the so-called “expert” as &amp;quot;a source for anything other than himself,” as Wikipedia's ever fluid policies dictate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daniel Brandt, founder of Namebase,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.namebase.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Google Watch, and Wikipedia Watch, removed Chip Berlet from his Board of Advisors in 1991 when Berlet refused to sit on the same Board which included Fletcher Prouty.&amp;quot;  Prouty, a retired Air Force colonel whose intelligence career stretched back to accompanying President [[Franklin Roosevelt]] to the [[Teheran conference]], was allegorically portrayed as the mysterious “Man X”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/lfprouty.htm Leroy Fletcher Prouty, Jr., Colonel, United States Air Force], [[Arlington National Cemetery]] Website, Retrieved November 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by Donald Southerland in  [[Oliver Stone]]'s film, [[JFK]]. A Brandt biographical page was created using Berlet as the source for unsavory attacks on Brandt.  Brandt describes himself as an &amp;quot;accountability activist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/04/your_take_roundupbelievers_neg.html Believers, Negativists Debate Wikipedia’s Trustworthiness], by Mark Glaser, 20 April 2006. Retrieved from pbs.org October 29, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Daniel_Brandt Wikiquote/Daniel Brandt#Sourced]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and claims he originally began working with Wikipedia editors in good faith during October 2005 but any biographical information he revealed was spun against him to depict him in a negative light.  Brandt states,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I soon realized that it was also about Berlet, who was still bent on undermining me. Berlet was using Wikipedia as part of his political agenda, and he was successful in this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=5641&amp;amp;st=40&amp;amp;p=21441&amp;amp;mode=linear#entry21441&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Berlet's biography underwent an extensive revision with most of the substantive NPOV criticism cut out.  The revising editor commented, &amp;quot;I kept Daniel Brandt, not because I feel he's a credible source, but because there's so little published criticism of Berlet, that I felt I had to retain something.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=9161554 Chip Berlet/Talk, SlimVirgin 00:19, 7 January 2005].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is an extraordinary statement and raises the question why the same high-level Administrator and author of several of Wikipedia's core content and citation policies, including '''Wikipedia:Reliable Sources''' and '''Wikipedia:Biographies of Living Persons''' ('''BLP'''),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;en.wikipedia.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons&amp;amp;diff=31947681&amp;amp;oldid=31753956&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; would use a source she did not consider credible. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies of living persons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia:Biographies of Living Persons (WP:BLP) policy did not come into being because of the Seigenthaler scandal, but rather over the Brandt controversy, as the originating editor noted in an edit summary.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;en.wikipedia.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Brandt requested Wikipedia delete his biographical entry, and ceased working with editors he suspected of working to further the propagation of false information about him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' magazine bills itself as the nation's oldest trade journal serving the newspaper industry with roots dating back to 1884.  Wikipedia founder [[Jimmy Wales]] responded to questions from ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' in a prepared statement on December 1, 2005 about Daniel Brandt saying,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I don't regard him as a valid source about anything at all&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/article_brief/eandp/1/1001612839 Wikipedia Founder, Readers Respond to Seigenthaler Article], Jay DeFoore, ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'', December 01, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales comments added '''undue weight'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:UNDUE#Undue_weight&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ('''WP:UNDUE''') to criticism of Brandt when placed within his biographical entry. Brandt demanded accountability from the army of unidentified Wikipedia Administrators furthering Chip Berlet's agenda to destroy Brandt's credibility, and elevate Berlet's own as a Wikipedia &amp;quot;expert.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:294577483 90fd22f5cd m.jpg|thumb|300px|right|From '''WikiTruth''', the inscription reads,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;''The Big Bad Brandt is Gonna Getcha!'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Brandt became known as the scourge of the Wikipedia Admin community.  WikiTruth says in its ''Brandt the Boogeyman'' entry,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|he dates back to a time when people would look up facts in books and would verify information without just doing a copy and paste from an AP news article and thinking they were done. He compares writing styles, he calls government agencies, and he writes letters. And when he's done, he tends to know. Or at least, he knows where he stands in terms of information. He's rather tenacious about getting stuff right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia, of course, doesn't do this much at all: depending on the day, they'll laud a link to a website as being absolutely useless (it's on the WEB, of course) and then the next minute link to a different website to back a &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; up. Citing books and printed materials is often a no-go, because nobody can read the original citation, so it gets swept away as well. Really, you have no idea what's good and what's bad, and it's all one big happy soup-hug. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, guys like Daniel Brandt are horrible for Wikipedia: he researches. He finds laws that pertain to situations. He asks the tough questions that could upset the whole Wiki-cart.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia continues to publish inaccurate and defamatory articles about living persons, written by anonymous contributors, based on other unreliable sources, and refuses to withdraw or change them. The victims of its libels have no legal means of compelling Wikipedia to make any changes. It is not answerable to any court or libel laws and simply behaves as if it is above the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Wordbomb Saga==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Patrick byrne overstock small.jpg|thumb|right|Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne [http://www.overstock.com/Patrick-Byrne-and-naked-short-selling/7371/static.html]]]&lt;br /&gt;
One of Wikipedia's most bitter and drawn-out disputes, chronicled in ''The Register,''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; centers around the assertion by representatives of Overstock.com&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.overstock.com/community&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that a [[Mainstream media|mainstream financial journalist]] Gary Weiss had been editing Wikipedia to impose his point of view on a series of articles relevant to the company. Weiss was once a reporter with BusinessWeek, in 2007 became a columnist with Forbes, and had for over 10 years been posting under fake names to confuse, distort, hijack Usenet groups, stock message boards, and Wikipedia, to prevent the public from understanding criminal activity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deepcapture.com/gary-weiss-scaramouch-psychopath/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Weiss was notorious around the Internet for his public feud with Overstock&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://garyweiss.blogspot.com/2007/05/overstockcoms-ethical-dilemma.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and its CEO [[Patrick Byrne]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://allantyoung.com/2008/09/22/patrick-byrne-vindicated/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ridiculing their campaign against the controversial practice of [[Naked Short Selling]].   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006, Judd Bagley, an ally of Overstock's Patrick Byrne having interviewed the CEO for a personal project, began editing Wikipedia to counter what was perceived to be a skewed representation of Naked Short Selling and Overstock.com. He was swiftly dispatched by influential Wikipedia administrators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after, Bagley became Overstock's Director of Communications, and embarked on an aggressive campaign to publicize the dispute on various websites, aiming to expose the administrators he held responsible for protecting Weiss. Using the moniker “Wordbomb”, Bagley presented evidence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://antisocialmedia.net/final-word-on-weiss/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; suggesting that not only was Gary Weiss editing Wikipedia using the name “User:Mantanmoreland“,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mantanmoreland&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but that he was operating other accounts to manipulate consensus and protect his interests in the dispute.  Mantanmoreland violated Wikipedia policies against Conflict of Interest and No Self Promotion by creating an article about himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gary_Weiss&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=48341962&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Bagley proved Weiss had edited Wikipedia from one of two main IPs used by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dtcc.com/about/business/index.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the organization charged with settling about a quadrillion stock trades each year. The DTCC is also the organization Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne said acts an enabler of perpetrators of illegal naked short selling of many public companies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=10360&amp;amp;st=0&amp;amp;p=36485&amp;amp;mode=linear#entry36485&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia responded to Bagley's campaign in typical schoolyard fashion. The dispute was escalated by a small clique of powerful Wikipedians who seemed less interested in the truth of Bagley's assertions, and more concerned with attacking perceived threats to the status quo at Wikipedia. With the approval of [[Jimbo Wales]], administrators sided with “Mantanmoreland” / Gary Weiss, and anointed Bagley / Wordbomb an “Enemy Of The Wiki” who needed to be silenced — a “stalker” and a “harasser” for publicizing the details of the person who had been editing relevant articles on Wikipedia, and the people who had been stopping him from doing the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For nearly two years, Bagley's name was invoked to inspire paranoia in the Wikipedia Admin Community to keep questioning editors in line. It became a textbook case for analysis of the intense group-think Wikipedia has become notorious for.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Judd bagley overstock.jpg|thumb|left|175px|Judd Bagley was made a target at the highest levels of Wikipedia and became a victim of a global [[witchhunt]] by the Wikipedia Admin Community for daring to expose an unholy alliance of abuse and [[corruption]] on [[Wall Street]] and in the Wikipedia cabal. [http://antisocialmedia.net/] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Bagley was repeatedly disparaged&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=15897&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by a cabal of out-of-control administrators such as Guy Chapman, who denounced Bagley as “lunatic” and “evil” when it suited. UK Wikimedia representative David Gerard banned an entire area of Utah to prevent Bagley raising his issues and made personally disparaging remarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:David_Gerard/archive_5#User:204.15.84.2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia Arbitrator Fred Bauder claimed that Bagley's blog AntiSocialMedia.net showed “moral depravity”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision&amp;amp;diff=158954587&amp;amp;oldid=158809362&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for challenging the Wiki-elite. Administrator Phil Sandifer dismissed Bagley in highly personal and offensive language while boasting&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083509.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that he himself had become a “powerful and trusted administrator on the 9th biggest website in the world.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other editors who raised Overstock's quite legitimate complaints were banned as proxies of Judd Bagley. Paranoia had taken such a hold that editors with productive records from all over the US, and as far afield as Europe and Asia found themselves accused of being Bagley. When the editor Cla68&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Cla68&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; questioned the issue of Gary Weiss editing Wikipedia, he was swiftly blocked by administrator Durova on the orders of Jimbo Wales who wrote,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gary_Weiss&amp;amp;diff=165916446&amp;amp;oldid=165916313&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; “Durova and Guy have my full support here. No nonsense, zero tolerance, shoot on sight. No kidding, this has gone on long enough”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SirFozzie/Investigation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; undertaken by concerned administrators into the editing patterns of “Mantanmoreland” came to fruition. Despite the “Mantanmoreland” account ceasing edits on Overstock / Naked Short Selling articles in September 2007, the study revealed evidence beyond reasonable doubt that the same person had been operating several accounts to “control” articles. Thus affirming Bagley's claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More worryingly for good faith Wikipedians was the revelation&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikback.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&amp;amp;Number=2762#Post2757&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/01/wikipedia_and_naked_shorting/print.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Jimbo Wales, alongside leading administrators, had considered that this person was almost certainly Gary Weiss in a private discussion as long ago as September 2007 (the same month the “Mantanmoreland” account quit editing the relevant articles). Meaning that behind the scenes, they were admitting that Bagley was probably right all along, yet in public were vilifying or blocking anyone who publicly stated so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the [[financial meltdown of 2008]], the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] issued directives aimed at curbing abusive naked short selling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.philly.com/inquirer/business/20090728_SEC_short-selling_rule_is_permanent.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Patrick Byrne has been widely recognized as in the forefront of the movement aimed at curbing such abuses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/?q=node/425&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Michael Moore==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Moorecagan.JPG|right|thumb|200px|Moore with [[Leslie Cagan]] [[United For Peace and Justice]] [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=629] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The website MichaelMoore.com, dissatisfied with a Wikipedia editor's edits to ''[[Sicko]]'', published an image of a Wikipedia user on its main page. This was combined with links to edit both ''Sicko'' and the editor's user page.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision#Michael_Moore]  Several Wikipedia editors and Administrators regarded this action on the part of [[Michael Moore]]'s official website as an egregious violation of a well publicized ruling to protect Wikipedia editors from outside harassment. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore_2] The consensus, per Wikipedia's policy was to remove links from Wikipedia to Michael Moore's attack site which was urging vengeance and reprisals against an editor who posted criticism of Moore's film.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Arbitration, Wikipedia's internal policy making and dispute resolution arm, the Arbitration chairman publicly admitted,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|No question it contained an attack, including a link to edit our user's page. The problem is that many of us like Michael Moore very much and don't care much for the viewpoint of the user involved. Applying our policy in a rote manner (Without consideration of '''the unwritten rule that we support prominent subjects that we like''') yields removal of the link (At least while it contained the personal attack).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikien-1 [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082980.html Harassment sites], Fred Bauder, Sun Oct 14 19:03:28 UTC 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View (NPOV), laid down by founder Jimbo Wales allegedly is &amp;quot;absolute and non-negotiable.&amp;quot; Few people find the claim convincing.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#_note-0] The ArbCom chairman further stated, &amp;quot;Obviously we need to make an exception for prominent people whose viewpoint we support.&amp;quot; [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082987.html] When asked, &amp;quot;How, then, is this remotely compatible with NPOV?&amp;quot;, the ArbCom chairman responded, &amp;quot;Not at all.&amp;quot; [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082993.html] The editor whom Michaelmoore.com was urging its viewers to attack and harass is described as &amp;quot;a Fellow at the [[American Enterprise Institute]], a [[conservative]] [[think tank]].&amp;quot;[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083230.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sinbad hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
On March 16, 2007, Wikipedia entry on the 50-year old entertainer Sinbad, born David Adkins, stated: &amp;quot;He succumbed to a fatal heart attack on the morning of March 14, 2007.&amp;quot;  This hoax was widely reported in the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ioltechnology.co.za/article_page.php?iSectionId=2891&amp;amp;iArticleId=3734818&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Robert Clark Young revenge edits==&lt;br /&gt;
From 2006 to 2013, Robert Clark Young, an author who had only published one novel to mixed reviews, edited Wikipedia extensively with 13,000 edits under username &amp;quot;Qworty.&amp;quot;  He engaged in aggressive behavior making revenge edits to biographical articles of his rival authors and other people against whom he held grudges. He also puffed up his own Wikipedia autobiography, and repeatedly denied that he was connected to Young.  He also created other single purpose accounts to further his campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Geri_Litton|title=Geri Litton sockpuppet investigation|date=2007|accessdate=July 11, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Qworty/Archive|title=Quorty sockpuppet inviestigant|date=2013|accessdate=July 11, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Only after his true identity was revealed in a salon.com article,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/|title=Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia|date=May 17, 2013|work=salon.com|accessdate=July 9, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was Young banned&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive797#User:Qworty|title=Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive797|accessdate=July 9, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and efforts made to reverse his vindictive edits.  In essence, he would remove favorable items from the biographies of his enemies or nominate them for deletion. The salon.com article concluded,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But Qworty’s example tells us that even when people call attention to a rogue editor, even when that editor’s temper tantrums come to the attention of the founder of Wikipedia, it’s quite possible that no action will be taken.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rutgers-Ivy League hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
A Wikipedia entry falsely stated that Rutgers was once invited to join the Ivy League.  Although that false statement was eventually removed from Wikipedia, it was not removed before the ''Daily News'' relied on it in this story:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't have to define your college with your football team, but Rutgers long ago decided to give it a try. Back in 1954, when it was considered a 'public Ivy,' Rutgers might have joined the fledgling Ivy League and altered its destiny. But the school declined the offer - arguably the dumbest mistake in its history. Ever since then, Rutgers has scrambled to prove itself worthy of playing football with the big boys.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bondy, Filip. &amp;quot;They Can Finally Say They Belong Here&amp;quot;, New York Daily News, 2006-11-10, p. 92. Retrieved on 2006-12-13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barbara Bauer vs. Wikimedia Foundation==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikimedia Foundation is one of 17 defendants in a lawsuit suit filed in New Jersey, by Barbara Bauer and her literary agency.  Her Wikipedia article was deleted on March 25, 2007 by Wikipedia administrator Doc Glasgow as a &amp;quot;bloody disgrace&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wikipedia-watch.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauertc.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{dead link}}&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wikipedia-watch.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauert1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauert2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{dead link}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==GFDL License Issue==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's practice of complete deletion of articles&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&amp;amp;page=Brian+Peppers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without reference to the original article, the author(s)/publisher(s) of the article, and the history and title(s) of the article, including modification history, description and appropriate dates, is a direct violation of at least GFDL version 1.2.  Additionally, the GFDL License states that if the article/document contains Copyright notices, that said notices must be preserved at all times. If those notices are removed, then they are in violation of Copyright Law, as well as the terms of the GFDL license.  Furthermore, the question of them removing anything outright at all comes into quite a grey area. If one reads the GFDL License literally, then it implies that once the article document is posted, it is in distribution, and technical measures are not allowed to be taken to prevent the use of the document in question, and that no other conditions whatsoever can be added by the user to those of the GFDL license.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Wikipocalypse:GF'DL&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html#TOC1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, beginning June 15, 2009, the Wikimedia Foundation began transitioning content on Wikipedia to be dual-licensed under both the GFDL and Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-06-15/News_and_notes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Censorship==&lt;br /&gt;
Among the many userboxes that are used by editors in Wikipedia, there is one that claims &amp;quot;Wikipedia is not censored&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Disavian/Userboxes/Not_Censored &amp;quot;Wikipedia is not censored&amp;quot; userbox] at Wikipedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is a lie, as Wikipedia routinely engages in censorship against any edits [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia|its editors and administrators do not like for political/ideological reasons]] (particularly involving political articles, the &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot; article, the [[GamerGate]] controversy article and articles involving gender-confused individuals and those claiming to be &amp;quot;non-binary&amp;quot;) and its leftist editors/administrators have been very quick to revert/censor such edits and to quickly block editors who make such edits to fit reality instead of the leftist editors' personal and ideological preference, wishful thinking and political correctness in defiance of reality and logic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cyberbullying==&lt;br /&gt;
The press have reported on incidents of [[cyberbullying]] on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news| url=http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/29/local/me-wikipedia29 | work=Los Angeles Times | first=Molly | last=Hennessy-Fiske | title=Wikipedia threats went unchecked – Los Angeles Times | date=29 April 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ABCLocal&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=6087243 Hacienda Heights school receives possible threat | abc7.com&amp;lt;!-- Bot generated title --&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news |title=Student arrested for violent threats on Wikipedia |first= |last= |url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2008/04/wiki.html?cid=6a00d8341c630a53ef011571abd811970b |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=29 April 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An editor threatened an Asian student at the Glen A. Wilson High School in 2008,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ABCLocal&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and a 14-year-old boy was arrested for making a threat against Niles West High School on Wikipedia in 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.pantagraph.com/news/article_baef01f3-e56f-52e1-b9af-e90eb83e811b.html|title=Teen charged after threat to school on Wikipedia|date=31 October 2006|agency=Associated Press  |publisher=Pantagraph.com|accessdate=26 January 2011|location=Bloomington, IL}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
María Sefidari, the female Chair of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Directors, is involved in a lesbian relationship with Wikipedia editor Laura Hale, which creates an inherent conflict of interest in the following controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.canberra.edu.au/researchrepository/items/d2d1d08e-20c3-4781-9072-57c8960c6c91/1/introductory_pages.pdf?attachment.uuid=a046d5df-9395-4700-a345-ebda1f122cc6|title=Thesis Acknowledgements|page=4|accessdate=July 15, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Ms. Hale has a long history, dating back to 2011 of incompetent edits and abusing male editors while making false accusations of &amp;quot;misogyny&amp;quot; against editors who correct her edits.  A long-time male administrator, Fram, followed Ms. Hale around making corrections to her problematic edits.  In turn, Ms. Hale complained to the Trust &amp;amp; Security staff of the Wikimedia Foundation, rather than to the volunteer-staffed complaint mechanisms on Wikipedia.  Although the Trust &amp;amp; Security staff has previously banned a few editors for problems involving illegal conduct such as pedophilia, in June 2019, for the first time, they suspended Fram for one year for alleged &amp;quot;incivility&amp;quot;.  In response, an English Wikipedia administrator lifted the block and was in turn stripped of his administratorship by the Foundation, and several other administrators resigned in protest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_response_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation%27s_ban_of_Fram|title=Wikipedia:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram|accessdate=June 24, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to a Buzzfeed article about the controversy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/josephbernstein/wikipedia-ban-editor-culture-war|title=The Culture War Has Finally Come For Wikipedia|date=July 27, 2019|accessdate=July 28, 2019|work=Buzzfeed News}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikimedia Foundation executive director Katharine Maher sent a tweet calling the article &amp;quot;s***ty&amp;quot;, which drew heavy criticism against her on her Twitter account from other Wikipedia editors for what they indicated was her dismissive and elitist attitude toward those opposed to the Foundation's unilateral abuse of power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://twitter.com/krmaher/status/1144394019893460993|title=tweet|accessdate=June 28, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As more Wikipedia Administrators and Bureaucrats resign or go on strike, the crisis has also been reported by Breitbart.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/06/28/wikipedia-editors-revolt-over-sites-ban-of-veteran-administrator/|title=Wikipedia Editors Revolt over Site’s Ban of Veteran Administrator|date=July 28, 2019|work=Breitbart|accessdate=July 28, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikipedia on bestiality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Wikipedia on bestiality]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted earlier, the Wikipedia project was initiated by [[atheism|atheists]] and [[entrepreneur]] Jimmy Wales and the [[agnosticism|agnostic]] [[philosophy]] [[professor]] [[Larry Sanger]] on January 15, 2001.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/lists/288/000092012/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. As of July 18, 2012, Wikipedia's article on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia zoophilia/bestiality] has an entire section on &amp;quot;arguments for zoophilia&amp;quot; plus pictures depicting zoophilia as well as a section on &amp;quot;arguments against zoophilia&amp;quot;. As of September 24, 2011, Wikipedia has a &amp;quot;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_the_law Zoophilia and the law&amp;quot;] article which has a section on the impact of zoophilia laws where eight alleged negative impacts of zoophilia laws are given, but no positive impacts of the laws are given.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_the_law#Impact_of_laws|title=Impact of laws section of &amp;quot;Zoophilia and the law&amp;quot;|date=July 17, 2012|accessdate=July 18, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Trademarks and domain names ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) uses the licensing of its trademarks as a tool to control local chapters.  Although each local chapter is in theory an autonomous organization, each chapter signs a contract with the WMF as a condition for using its trademarks.  The WMF also tried to stake out control over many domain names that contain the word &amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot; including &amp;quot;[[wikileaks]]&amp;quot;.  WikiLeaks and Wikipedia have no affiliation with each other. (&amp;quot;Wiki&amp;quot; describes a type of website and is not a trademark.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiLeaks_is_not_part_of_Wikipedia |title=Wikipedia:WikiLeaks is not part of Wikipedia |work=Wikipedia |publisher=[[Wikimedia Foundation]] |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/wiki-giants-on-a-collision-course-over-shared-name-2065561.html |title=Wiki giants on a collision course over shared name |last1=Rawlinson |first1=Kevin |first2=Tom |last2=Peck |date=30 August 2010 |work=The Independent |location=London |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikia did purchase several WikiLeaks-related domain names (including wikileaks.com and wikileaks.net) as a &amp;quot;protective brand measure&amp;quot; in 2007.&amp;lt;ref name=wikia&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.wikia.com/Press:Wikia_Does_Not_Own_Wikileaks_Domain_Names |title=Press:Wikia Does Not Own Wikileaks Domain Names |work=[[Wikia]] |publisher=[[Wikia]] |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikia started to transfer those domain names to WikiLeaks on June 14, 2007, but the transfer was never completed, and Wikia held those domain names when the &amp;quot;Wikileaks scandal&amp;quot; broke.&amp;lt;ref name=wikia/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Humorous quotes concerning Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...dealing with the Wikipedians is like walking into a mental hospital: the floors are carpeted, the walls are nicely padded, but you know there’s a pretty good chance at any given moment one of the inmates will pick up a knife.” - quote from a ''[[New York Times]]'' article on Wikipedia written by the journalist and author Judith Newman&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/fashion/Wikipedia-Judith-Newman.html?smid=pl-share Wikipedia-Mania: Wikipedia, What Does Judith Newman Have to Do to Get a Page?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An article entitled ''Wikipedia Gridlocked by Wikipedia Nerds'' declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|So who are these Gatekeepers to all the internet's knowledge?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A survey the foundation conducted last year determined that the average age of an editor is 26.8 years, and that 87% of them are men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you suspected: [[nerd]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gawker.com/5410917/wikipedia-gridlocked-by-wikipedia-nerds&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jimmy Wales said the typical profile of a Wikipedia contributor is &amp;quot;a 26-year-old geeky male&amp;quot; who moves on to other ventures, gets married, and leaves the website.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/5397593/Wikipedia-losing-contributors-founder-says Wikipedia losing contributors, founder says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seth Meyers noted on his ''Late Night'' program, &amp;quot;Wikipedia is now accepting donations using the online currency Bitcoin. So now you can support information you're not sure is true with currency you're not sure is money.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thespec.com/living-story/4733681-tuesdayfile/ Retrieved August 8, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When obscure author Patrick Modiano was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in October 2014, few journalists knew much about him.  The person updating his Wikipedia biography to reflect the prize added this warning to the article, &amp;quot;To the Reporter Now Copying From Wikipedia: Be careful boy. Primary sources are still best for journos.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/10/09/nobel_prize_winner_patrick_modiano_s_wikipedia_page_changed_to_add_note.html|title=A Reminder to Journalists Writing About the New Nobel Prize Winner, From Wikipedia|first=Forrest |last=Wickman|date=October 9, 2014|work=Slate|accessdate=October 10, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_Modiano&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=628920987&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unbiased editor recruitment==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia claims that anyone can edit it.  That is true to an extent,but its editor pool is self-selecting.  However, on  January 25–29, 2012, the Wikimedia Foundation paid for Gregory Varnum and others to attend and staff a booth at the &amp;quot;24th National Conference on LGBT Equality: Creating Change&amp;quot; conference in Baltimore, Maryland.  The purpose of the Wikimedia booth was to recruit more LGBT activists to edit Wikipedia.  Although Wikimedia has outreach efforts at other conferences, there has been no outreach at conservative events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia editor [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch Sarah Stierch] was the volunteer moderator of the Gender Gap email list where she departed from discussing Wikipedia to freely share her negative experiences with men in her life.  In fall 2011, she was hired by the WMF as a Community Fellow to work on creating a &amp;quot;Teahouse&amp;quot; for newer Wikipedia editors. The report on the Teahouse Pilot Project&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Research:Teahouse/Pilot_Report&amp;amp;oldid=3832292|title=Teahouse: Pilot Report|date=June 14, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; explained, &amp;quot;If you click through to the Teahouse, it’s clearly aiming to broaden female participation - just look at the pastel background and references to tea.&amp;quot; Stierch tried to use Twitter to recruit more female editors into Teahouse and the English Wikipedia. The report concluded, &amp;quot;Because so much time and energy needed to be spend during the pilot on setting up and maintaining the space, we weren't able to focus as much as we'd have liked on gender-targeted strategies for recruiting female guests and hosts. There are clearly more experiments that need to be run in order to better integrate the space with other gender gap efforts and WikiWomen's calls to actions.&amp;quot;  The WMF terminated Stierch on January 9, 2014 following complaints of her moonlighting as a paid editor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-January/129466.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 18, 2014, during the Congressional summer recess, the [[Cato Institute]] and Wikimedia DC jointly conducted a seminar to encourage Congressional staff members to edit Wikipedia about pending legislation and policy issues.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/08/18/a-call-to-edit-congress-and-wikipedia-told-to-peacefully-co-exist/|title=A call to edit: Congress and Wikipedia told to peacefully co-exist|first=Nancy|last=Scola|date=August 18, 2014|accessdate=August 22, 2014|work=Washington Post}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.c-span.org/video/?321030-1/discussion-wikipedia-government-transparency|date=August 18, 2014|accessdate=August 22, 2014|title=Wikipedia and Congress|work=C-SPAN}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The panel discussion included Michelle Newby, a full-time Cato employee who edits Wikipedia as a part of her job.  She promised to work with any Congressional Staff that would be interested in editing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flaws in governance structure==&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps Wikipedia's greatest structural problem is Jimmy Wales' inability to remove himself from the process. He calls himself a &amp;quot;God-King&amp;quot; and rules the site with the style of [[monarchy]], robbing it of its potential to achieve some form of [[Jeffersonian]] [[democracy]] and accountability. Wales once speculated that all significant productivity emerged from his circle of a few hundred personal friends while the rest of the world groped along doing only spelling and punctuation mark corrections and other trivial modifications. The computer programmer and activist Aaron Swartz did a proper analysis and showed that the productivity was the results of many, many thousands of anonymous users. Swartz later committed [[suicide]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales delegated the run-of-the-mill decision-marking to a hand-picked group he called the Arbitration Committee. They take months to make any decisions and dole out multi-month to multi-year or permanent intervention solutions. A reputable encyclopedia usually simply chooses an Editor-in-Chief, i.e. one reputable, mature and experienced person with one mind to make high-quality decisions rapidly and perhaps dispense moderate penalties when needed. Sanger served as such, but Wales, an [[Objectivist]] economics major and former stock options trader, opted to drastically reduce his salary when it became clear that the project would be a success, thus forcing him out. Wales has since been making a living, in part, by promoting his notions of governance of Internet-based projects, often emphasizing that users should remain anonymous and thus without any serious form of credential or reputation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problems are in the structure and in the personality flaws of Wales himself. Wales takes advantage of this vast pool of free labor to hunt his perceived enemies, somewhat in the style of [[L. Ron Hubbard]] or other such supposed founders of movements.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equally important are the flawed steps that Wales took to separate the community of volunteer Wikipedia editors from the financial control of the enterprise.  The servers and software are owned by the [[Wikimedia Foundation]] (WMF), a non-profit organization that at first was set up as a membership organization, but quickly changed to a non-membership organization so that members would not have any legal say regarding the organization.  Although people who have made a required minimum number of edits per year can vote for members of the Arbitration Committee and for a minority of the WMF Board seats, at least one community-elected Board member was removed because he did not agree with the majority of the Board.  Of course, Wales is guaranteed a perpetual WMF Board seat as a co-founder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally, revenue from fundraising banners in the United States went to the WMF, but banner revenue in foreign countries went to the chapters located in those countries.  In recent years, the WMF has consolidated all fundraising revenues, with national chapters being forced to apply for specific grants from the WMF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To further complicate the financial controls, the WMF established a separate endowment at the [[Tides Foundation]] which is controlled by that foundation in consultation with an advisory board. Instead of having a community-selected advisory board or the entire WMF Board serving as the advisory board, the Tides Foundation appointed a new group with Wales and large donors serving.  When the endowment reaches its fundraising target, the advisory board decides whether the funds should stay at the Tides Foundation, be transferred to the WMF, or used in some other way.  So, if Wales has a falling out with the WMF Board over the next ten years, he and his hand-picked advisory board could take the Wikipedia endowment somewhere else. The editing community has no say in the endowment—who manages it or how the income will be spent.&lt;br /&gt;
==Core Policies==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia has three policies that it calls its core policies. These are Neutral Point of View, Verifiability, and No Original Research. Despite designating these three policies as &amp;quot;core&amp;quot;, Wikipedia barely even cares about them, especially with cases in regard to atheism. Wikipedia has reverted well-substantiated edits for disagreeing with atheism numerous times, gone several paragraphs on pro-atheism topics without citing a single source, banned Creation Ministries International employees for an indefinite amount of times despite said employees having not violated any written policy, and more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Wikipedia|Articles about '''Wikipedia''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:The Protocols of Ritual Defamation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia prejudice and KAL 007]] (Wikipedia deletion material related to [[New World Order]] and [[Larry McDonald]], touching [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]])&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Deletionpedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Wikipedia and Citizendium]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/aug/21/conservatives-miss-wikipedias-threat/ SHEFFIELD: Conservatives miss Wikipedia's threat] by [[Washington Times]], August 21, 2008 &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/print.html Wikipedia black helicopters circle Utah's Traverse Mountain], By Cade Metz, ''The Register'', 6 December 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/15/wikipedia_can_damage_your_grades/ Avoid Wikipedia, warns Wikipedia chief - It can seriously damage your grades] by Andrew Orlowski, ''The Register'', June 15, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/18/wikipedia_quality_problem/ Wikipedia founder admits to serious quality problems] by Andrew Orlowski, ''The Register'', October 18, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia Who Writes Wikipedia?] by Aaron Swartz, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/07/05/wikipedias-seven-worst-moments/ Wikipedia’s Seven Worst Moments] by Charlie Nash, ''Breitbart News'', July 5, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://evolutionnews.org/2017/11/wikipedia-and-astroturf/ Wikipedia and “Astroturf”] Sarah Chaffee, Evolution News. November 30, 2017 (Journalist [[Sharyl Attkisson]]).&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://oedb.org/ilibrarian/top-7-alternatives-to-wikipedia/  Top 7 Alternatives to Wikipedia] Open Education Database. (Includes Conservapedia along with six other online encyclopedias, criticizes Wikipedia for inaccuracies and hypocrisy.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/01/2013-is-starting-off-to-be-bad-year-for.html Study shows that the world's biggest pro-evolution website is driving away newcomer editors! Also, video shows evolutionists at Wikipedia are clowns!]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wikipediocracy.com Wikipediocracy]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia_controversies Wikipedia's List of Wikipedia controversies]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/story/2704 Wikipedia: What Is It Good For?], By Dick Clark, 9/19/2007. Retrieved from The Ludwig von Mises Institute, http://www.mises.org/ November 5, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MoVLl_ne2Y Wikipedias' Own Cofounder Lambastes the Site for Bias]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Encyclopedias]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikimedia Foundation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;diff=1733526</id>
		<title>Wikipedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;diff=1733526"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T23:51:51Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Wpp.png|thumb|right|200px|The multilingual Wikipedia home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Wikipedia''' is an [[internet|online]] [[wiki]]-based [[encyclopedia]] hosted and owned by the non-profit organization [[Wikimedia Foundation]] and financially supported by grants from left-leaning foundations plus an aggressive annual online fundraising drive.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20180527010133/http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_releases/Wikimedia_Foundation_announces_tenth_annual_fundraising_campaign&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Most of Wikipedia's articles can be edited publicly by both registered and anonymous editors,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://books.google.com/books?id=wMhBQ0WdjF4C&amp;amp;pg=PA199#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; mostly consisting of teenagers and the unemployed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;theregister.co.uk&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/18/sanger_forks_wikipedia/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As such, it tends to project a [[liberal]]—and, in some cases, even [[socialist]], [[Communist]], and [[Nazi]]-sympathising—worldview, which is totally at odds with [[conservative]] [[reality]] and rationality.[[Fact]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia was co-founded by [[Jimbo Wales]] (an [[Atheism|atheist]], [[libertarian]], and [[objectivist]]), and philosophy professor [[Larry Sanger]] in 2001.  The website was originally created to complement the now-defunct peer-reviewed online encyclopedia [[Nupedia]] as a way for collaboration on articles. However, Wikipedia overtook Nupedia and became an independent project hosted by the [[Wikimedia Foundation]], which also hosts various related websites, known as &amp;quot;sister projects&amp;quot;, such as ''Wikinews'' and ''Wikibooks''.  Co-founder Larry Sanger later acknowledged that Wikipedia does not follow its own neutrality policy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SangerNeutrality&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/larry-sanger-co-founder-of-wikipedia-agrees-that-it-does-not-follow-its-own-neutrality-policy/ Uncommon Descent, December 1, 2016, Posted by Barry Arrington]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of Wikipedia state that Wikipedia's articles contain [[Examples of bias in Wikipedia|systemic bias]],&amp;lt;ref name=howtheleft&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-swindle/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that the information included within its articles are a mixture of truths, [[half-truth]]s, and falsehoods.&amp;lt;ref name=hnn&amp;gt;http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/125437&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The nature of Wikipedia also makes it subject to spin and [[bias]], examples of which include paid public relations advocacy and inserting libelous content into the biographies of politicians for a political purpose.&amp;lt;ref name=hnn/&amp;gt; Wikipedia was also criticized for having a [[liberal bias]] in its articles about politics, despite Wikipedia's &amp;quot;neutral point of view&amp;quot; policy.&amp;lt;ref name=howtheleft/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their biased admins causes people to get blocked for little to no reason.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Continuing loss of influence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's traffic level stems from its high placement in Google searches, and that many people rely upon it for quick research regarding trivial facts.  However, users are turning to alternatives such as the voice-based iPhone application [[Siri]] or the Knowledge Graph display on Google search result pages of key facts about search targets.&amp;lt;ref name=timesindia&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/internet/Google-eating-into-Wikipedia-page-views/articleshow/29072825.cms?referral=PM|title=Google eating into Wikipedia page views?|work=Times of India|first=Subodh |last=Varma|date=January 20, 2014|accessdate=March 20, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia page-views dropped by 2 billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Wikipedia's most popular versions are leading the decline: page-views of the English Wikipedia dropped by 12 percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost 9 percent.&amp;lt;ref name=timesindia/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to the number of visitors declining, there continues to be a drop in active editors as well.  In August 2012, it was reported that Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/pro-evolution-wikipedia-has-shrinking.html Pro-evolution Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors plus [[Quora]] is Wikipedia's worst nightmare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the same time, ''Business Insider'' indicated [[Quora]] was &amp;quot;Wikipedia's worst nightmare&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/pro-evolution-wikipedia-has-shrinking.html Pro-evolution Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors plus Quora is Wikipedia's worst nightmare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unreliability of Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia relies on self-selected &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; to write and compile articles, with no preference given for scholars in the fields about which they are writing. This fact may disqualify Wikipedia from being considered a genuine encyclopedia, ironically even by its own standards. An encyclopedia is supposed to be a collection of articles by &amp;quot;well-educated, well-informed content experts.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Theoretically, Wikipedia is supposed to compensate for this weakness by requiring references to reputable secondary sources. But editors can delete, without collaboration, any text or entry they dislike, citing one of the many Wikipedia guidelines for doing so. Entries posted by scholars in the field, based on peer-reviewed, academic articles are deleted by editors with an ideological bias. Wikipedia, then, only represents the majority view of its editors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the contribution of volunteer editors has declined, some of the void has been replaced by paid public relations professionals.  These paid editors seek to present their client companies or individuals in the best possible light.  This has resulted in many articles being transformed into paid advertising pieces that take advantage of the English Wikipedia's high placement on Google search results.  This chronic problem has become so severe that the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed amending its terms of service to require disclosures of paid editing conflicts of interest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use/Paid_contributions_amendment|title=Terms of use/Paid contributions amendment|date=February 21, 2014|accessdate=March 20, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the competition to control content, the paid PR editors win out because they are monitoring pages as a full-time job, while editors seeking to keep content more balanced are only part-time volunteers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the ''American Journalism Review'' declared concerning Wikipedia:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;An even more blunt assessment appears in the encyclopedia's &amp;quot;Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia&amp;quot; posting: &amp;quot;We do not expect you to trust us. It is in the nature of an ever-changing work like Wikipedia that, while some articles are of the highest quality of scholarship, others are admittedly complete rubbish.&amp;quot; It also reminds users not to use Wikipedia as a primary source or for making &amp;quot;critical decisions.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Despite its official &amp;quot;neutrality policy,&amp;quot; [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia|Wikipedia has a strong liberal bias.]] In an article entitled &amp;quot;Wikipedia Lies, Slander Continue,&amp;quot; [[journalism|journalist]] [[Joseph Farah]] stated Wikipedia &amp;quot;is not only a provider of inaccuracy and bias. It is a wholesale purveyor of lies and slander unlike any other the world has ever known.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wnd.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=83640&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Mr. Farah has repeatedly been the victim of defamation on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wnd.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  In December 2010, [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[JP Holding]] called Wikipedia &amp;quot;the abomination that causes misinformation&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://tektonticker.blogspot.com/search/label/Wikipedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some say that Wikipedia's unreliability is systemic, citing Douglas Adams: &amp;quot;''In other words—and this is the rock-solid principle on which the whole of the Corporation’s Galaxywide success is founded—their fundamental design flaws are completely hidden by their superficial design flaws.'' Wikipedia, which is written by anyone, still struggles to solve the need for traditional quality controls characteristic of conventional [[encyclopedia]]s. The self-policing practices have produced results and accuracy some claim is far better than originally expected but still widely questioned. Research released in April 2012 claimed 60% of Wikipedia articles contain &amp;quot;inaccuracies&amp;quot;, leading the ''[[Daily Mail]]'' to dub it &amp;quot;Iffy-Pedia&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2131458/Up-articles-Wikipedia-contain-factual-errors.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The lack of consistency and uniform supervision leaves an ever-present shadow over any given piece of information. Many in the [[College|academy]] insist that it is an unreliable source for [[research]] and an unacceptable reference in many classrooms. However, Wikipedia steers people to original [[Source|source material]], and with the use of hyperlinks and [[search engine]]s, it has become the most widely used intermediary reference tool on the [[Internet]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the style manual for the [[Associated Press]], the largest news agency in the United States, Wikipedia should not be used as a primary source, but the hyperlinks in articles may be helpful as sources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia has millions of entries on trivia and mundane topics ranging from an explanation for &amp;quot;duh&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duh (only after Conservapedia criticized the entry on the English word &amp;quot;duh&amp;quot; did Wikipedia eventually remove it)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to singles by obscure rock bands&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honk_If_You_Love_Fred_Durst Honk If You Love Fred Durst]'' (accessed April 1, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to arcane British nobility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Part of the article about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Liddell Henry Liddell], a 19th-century Vice-chancellor of Oxford University and author, includes that his grandfather was the youngest son of the 8th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, and that his daughter was the child ''Alice in Wonderland'' was written for (accessed April 1, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There are editions of Wikipedia in 250 languages, and 130 have more than 1000 articles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias List of Wikipedias - Wikimedia], accessed April 1, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After about four years Wikipedia had about 450,000 entries,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aaron Weiss, The Unassociated Press, N.Y. Times, Feb. 10, 2005, at G5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and after six years it had about 1.7 million entries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics English Wikipedia statistics] accessed April 1, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Four years later this number had more than doubled again: in November 2011, there were more than 3.8 million content pages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics English Wikipedia statistics] accessed May 6, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As of February 2014, there are more than 4.4 million &amp;quot;content&amp;quot; pages, many of which lack educational value. On important topics, the information is often misleading due to the unchecked, [[Wikipedia#Leftist bias|systematic liberal bias]] that dominates Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of Wikipedia articles can vary greatly.  Some articles, particularly about narrow topics and those of little interest, are well written and appear to have input from one or more subject matter experts.  Articles about broader topics and with high viewership naturally have more editors, many of whom are not well versed in the subject matter.  In determining the quality of an article it is helpful to check the sources or references to see if one or more of the standard references for the topic is frequently cited.  Often the most valuable feature of an article will be to direct the reader to good quality references, if they exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Origins==&lt;br /&gt;
Initially, Wikipedia was hosted on servers operated by Bomis, Inc., a company that also sold pornographic pictures.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Martin Hickman and Genevieve Roberts, &amp;quot;WIKIPEDIA,&amp;quot; The Independent (London) p. 12 (Feb 13, 2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The majority owner of Bomis had lost his fortune in a lawsuit, and the Wikipedia volunteers feared that if all of Bomis' assets were seized, ownership of Wikipedia would be transferred.  In 2003, Jimbo Wales addressed this risk by founding the Wikimedia Foundation to take control of Wikipedia's assets. The Wikimedia Foundation is a non-profit organization that provides support for Wikipedia and other similar projects,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home Wikimedia Foundation] accessed April 7, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and also the free MediaWiki software that runs Wikipedia and Conservapedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki home] accessed April 7, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It also gives out millions of dollars in grants each year to liberal causes that recruit liberals to edit Wikipedia so as to reflect their biases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leftist bias ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Leftist roots of Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia shows a systematic bias in the proportion of articles which treat controversial issues.  It ignores its own [[NPOV]] policy when it allows contributors to &amp;quot;delete well-referenced information&amp;quot; merely because it comes from a [[scientist]] who holds a minority view. It would only be a violation, if the article used the information to give a false impression of the proportion of scientists adhering to that view, but liberals use &amp;quot;undue weight&amp;quot; like a sledge hammer. They are either unaware or unconcerned about their bias.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not surprising, given this [[Zogby]] poll:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While 97% of [[Republican]]s surveyed said the media are [[liberal]], two-thirds of [[political independent]]s feel the same, but fewer than one in four independents (23%) said they saw a &amp;quot;conservative bias&amp;quot;. [[Democrat]]s, while much more likely to perceive a conservative bias than other groups, were not nearly as sure the [[media]] was against them as were the Republicans. While Republicans were unified in their perception of a [[left-wing]] media, just two-thirds of Democrats were certain the media skewed [[right-wing|right]] – and 17% said the bias favored the left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1262&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
David Swindle writes at [[FrontPage Magazine]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There was not a single ideological vision driving Wikipedia’s founders and core contributors as they launched the project. Jimmy Wales, who would become the face of the project and its “benevolent dictator,” according to Andrew Lih’s ''The Wikipedia Revolution​'', is a libertarian and [[Ayn Rand|Ayn Rand​ian]] [[Objectivism|Objectivist]]. Also important in shaping Wikipedia was the so-called “hacker ethos,” the culture that has developed amongst computer programmers over the last 40 years and been shaped by the Left, the counterculture, popular culture, and [[anarchism|anarchist]] thought.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What binds together these ideologies is a [[utopia]]n ideal that human beings are more prone to [[altruism]] rather than self-interest. In Wikipedia Revolution Wales is quoted as saying, “Generally we find most people out there on the internet are good… It’s one of the wonderful humanitarian discoveries in Wikipedia, that most people only want to help us and build this free nonprofit, charitable resource.” Ward Cunningham was the programmer who created the wiki concept and software. According to Lih, he believed in the Wiki because “People are generally good.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lih explains how this philosophy is embedded within Wikipedia’s rules:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A core idea Wikipedia embraced.. was to assume good faith when interacting with others. The guideline promoted optimistic production rather than pessimistic nay-saying, and reads, “Unless there is strong evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it; avoid accusing others of harmful motives without particularly strong evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as it worked out, Wikipedia in practice has strayed from these utopian ideas because of the ease with which political and social bias trumps altruism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After almost a decade of rapid growth and free-wheeling experimentation the situation at the site by the Summer of 2009 was chaos. Political operatives would sabotage one another in electoral contests by vandalizing pages. More malicious misinformation filtered in freely, with living historical figures accused of involvement in conspiratorial plots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/23/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia co-founder [[Larry Sanger]], who left the site, later acknowledged that Wikipedia does not follow its own neutrality policy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SangerNeutrality&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Peter-Singer.jpg|right|thumbnail|250px|The atheist philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of [[bestiality]] (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the [[liberal]] and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  See: [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Wikipedia on bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia also has an automatic Wikimedia Commons editing software called &amp;quot;Commonist,&amp;quot; which allows the user to upload multiple files at once.  The symbol of [[communism]] - the &amp;quot;hammer and sickle&amp;quot; of the leftist ideology which murdered millions in the former [[Soviet Union]] - is featured prominently on the instruction page as well as the tags that mark each uploaded image.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Commonist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 23, 2011, David Swindle published an article at ''[[FrontPage Magazine]]'' detailing how Wikipedia has been taken over by the [[Leftist|political left]] and he cited statistics relating to Wikipedia's articles on [[Anne Coulter]], [[Michael Moore]], [[Glenn Beck]] and [[Keith Olbermann]] which helped demonstrate the Wikipedia has a leftist/liberal bias plus he discussed the liberal/leftist cultural foundations of Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/23/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/ How the left conquered Wikipedia - Part 1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, Swindle wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Consider Ann Coulter versus Michael Moore​. Coulter’s entry (on August 9, 2011) was 9028 words long.* Of this longer-than-usual entry, 3220 words were devoted to “Controversies and criticism” in which a series of incidents involving Coulter and quotes from her are cited with accompanying condemnations, primarily from her opponents on the Left. That’s 35.6 percent of Coulter’s entry devoted to making her look bad. By contrast, Moore’s entry is 2876 words (the more standard length for entries on political commentators), with 130 devoted to “Controversy.” That’s 4.5% of the word count, a fraction of Coulter’s. Does this mean that an “unbiased” commentator would find Coulter eight times as “controversial” as Moore?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Talk Pages ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of Wikipedia's leftist bias is clearly evident from their talk pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, when an article about the Barcelona May Days&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:May_Days&amp;amp;oldid=903699178&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an event during the Spanish Civil War where hundreds of anti-Stalinist Trotskyists and anarchists were gunned down by the pro-Stalin Republican government) portrayed the anti-Stalinist side, which contained author George Orwell, in a generally favourable light, Stalinists filled the talk page with childish attacks on the authors of the article, including expletives, as is characteristic of Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Purported &amp;quot;Tertiary&amp;quot; Source and Arbitrary Standards==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia purports to be a &amp;quot;tertiary&amp;quot; source, relying on edited work from reputable sources. The policy is meant to build on the work of qualified editors of secondary sources. Some accuse Wikipedia, therefore, of relying on [[hearsay]], and discouraging the application of [[logic]] and new development of new insights. The result is an agglomeration of reheated &amp;quot;consensus&amp;quot; with little or no intellectual merit of its own; in particular, it is impossible to challenge orthodoxy, received wisdom or commonly held misconceptions through the Wikipedia system, no matter how factually incorrect those orthodoxies might be. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supporters of Wikipedia would claim that relying on secondary sources encourages reliability and objectivity. However, there are cases of Wikipedia applying it's standards arbitrarily. For example, the case of Wikipedia editor &amp;quot;Yeoberry&amp;quot; (user ID 3606936), an editor with a Ph.D. in church history who first posted materials about &amp;quot;Icons&amp;quot; on August 6, 2012, with multiple citations to historical documents. The material was removed and Yeoberry was told that Wikipedia is a &amp;quot;tertiary&amp;quot; source and so he needed to find reliable secondary sources. On April 4, 2013, Yeoberry again added largely the same material, this time citing a newly published academic paper in a peer-reviewed journal. The information was again removed, with editors, at least some of whom religiously affiliated with the organization supporting icons, claiming the editor had a &amp;quot;COI&amp;quot; (conflict of interest). Neither time did the editors removing Yeoberry's material consult Yeoberry. But when Yeoberry reverted to his edition, he was charged with &amp;quot;edit warring.&amp;quot; When Yeoberry challenged the arbitrary use of Wikipedia criteria he was blocked from editing indefinitely and then his access to his own talk page was also blocked.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;amp;oldid=548948980#Proposal:_Indefinite_Block&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia articles, especially on controversial or political and religious topics, are often guarded by editors who have an interest in slanting the content of the article, may have no formal education on the topic, and can find a so-called reason for suppressing the information they want to suppress. Editors can claim the source is unreliable (as they interpret that); that information gives &amp;quot;UNDUE&amp;quot; weight to the topic the information is about; peer-reviewed, academic articles written by scholars can be removed by editors if, in the opinion of an editor, the view expressed is &amp;quot;Fringe&amp;quot; or if the contributor has a &amp;quot;COI&amp;quot; (conflict of interest) if he's the author of the secondary source or has an advanced education or other interest in the topic; etc. Editors with advanced education in a topic, citing sources from peer-reviewed journals, can have their contributions deleted and their participation prohibited if a few other editors, without such qualification but with enough knowledge of the Wikipedia jargon, decide to suppress him or her. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally, encyclopedias were written by scholars, either by one or a few whose knowledge is considered &amp;quot;encyclopedic&amp;quot; (i.e. very broad) or each article is written by an expert in the field. But in Wikipedia, expertise in a given field can disqualify one from contributing in that field resulting in Wikipedia being accused of being a &amp;quot;[[idiocracy]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Wikipedia is non-profit, the [[Wikia]] project of its co-founder is very much for-profit and has raised millions of dollars in [[venture capital]]. Already Wikipedia has been criticized for favoring Wikia. When Wikipedia community voted 61-39% percent to treat all links to other sites equally by removing nofollow (Google-ignored) tags for all of them, the Wikipedia co-founder overruled this decision and Wikipedia now favors Wikia in its treatment of nofollow tags.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/28/wikipedia-special-treatment-for-wikia-and-other-wikis/|title=Wikipedia: Special Treatment for Wikia and some other Wikis|author=Nik Cubrilovic|date=April 28, 2007|accessdate=July 22, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-January/061137.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The Register'' said:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;theregister.co.uk&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Wikipedia has tried to balance the Utopian goal of &amp;quot;an encyclopedia anyone can edit&amp;quot; with the more utilitarian goal of &amp;quot;a website anyone would want to read&amp;quot;. With over a million articles, and a rulebook almost as dense, Wikipedia has demonstrated an insatiable desire to participate, create lists and generate procedures. The result is a huge silo of recorded trivia, and perhaps the world's largest, most distributed bureaucracy - mostly manned by a casual staff of teenagers and the unemployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the past few years, Wikipedia has added banners begging for money from its viewers. The site claims to be in need of more funding, but in fact it is &amp;quot;awash with cash - and raises far more money each year than it needs to keep operating.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/20/cash_rich_wikipedia_chugging/ Wikipedia doesn't need your money - so why does it keep pestering you?], 20 December 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia, a registered trademark of Wikimedia Foundation, is used also by services like WikiExperts.us, which is declared as not being affiliated with it.&lt;br /&gt;
WikiExperts.us accepts money to write Wikipedia entries for businesses and is included in American business ventures of Alex Konanykhin, the Former Russian oligarch, who has been wanted in Russia since Yeltsin's days to face charges relating to embezzlement and financial fraud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title='Not terrorists': Hysteria over MH17 fails to take account of both law and facts |author=Roslyn Fuller |date=July 25, 2014 |accessdate=July 26, 2014 |url=http://rt.com/op-edge/175496-hysteria-mh17-ukraine-facts-terrorists/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scandals and decline==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wikipedia scandals.jpg|thumb|450px|right|Decline in Wikimedia Foundation donations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://centiare.com/Wikipedia_scandals Wikipedia scandals]. Retrieved from centiare.com October 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Graph courtesy [http://www.centiare.com/Directory:Gregory_J._Kohs Gregory Kohs].  Used with Permission.]]The cumulative effect of multiple scandals and revelations has led to declining activity on the English Wikipedia. The rate of new account creation peaked in early 2007 and has declined ~30% since.  Overall editing activity showed a steady decline beginning in February 2007. An independent analysis reported, &amp;quot;The rate at which edits were being made to Wikipedia articles appears to have peaked in February to April 2007 and declined since. This decline is unprecedented in Wikipedia's history.... Though it may be purely coincidental, this time frame also corresponds to the Essjay controversy appearing in the press.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2007-October/033661.html Statistical Decline of the English Wikipedia], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dragons_flight/Log_analysis Dragons flight/Log analysis], October 9, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even after the hoax was revealed of high level intimates promoted by the Wikimedia Foundation as experts in fields that they were not, to persuade college professors to allow students to cite Wikipedia as a reliable source, and entrusted with the ability to invade users privacy which could affect, in their words, &amp;quot;life and death,&amp;quot; Wikipedia still appealed to students with a Jim and Tammy Faye Baker-style fundraising slogan across one million project space pages that read, &amp;quot;OMG! Wikipedia is gone! I’ll flunk my exams!&amp;quot; [http://whygive.wikimedia.org/2007/11/24/omg-wikipedia-is-gone-ill-flunk-my-exams/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further evidence of the decline in Wikipedia is that the number of editors who voted in the 2012 Arbitration Committee elections has dropped to 858.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2012#Turnout|title=Arbitration Commitee Elections December 2012|accessdate=December 18, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For a website that claims to have thousands of active editors, this is very low.  Active editors are discouraged from voting because all voters are subject to automatic investigation and invasion of their privacy to determine if they are &amp;quot;sockpuppets&amp;quot; of other voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://archive.is/6tiF8|title=Wikipedia's &amp;quot;scrutineers&amp;quot; snoop on living arrangements of contributors|work=Examiner|first=Greg|last=Kohs|date=December 11, 2013|accessdate=December 15, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shane Fitzgerald Hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the death of composer Maurice Jarre, a Wikipedia editor named Shane Fitzgerald attached a quote to Jarre's page: &amp;quot;One could say my life itself has been one long soundtrack. Music was my life, music brought me to life, and music is how I will be remembered long after I leave this life. When I die there will be a final waltz playing in my head, that only I can hear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hoaxes.org/archive/permalink/the_maurice_jarre_wikipedia_hoax/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The words are poetic, yet were never spoken by Jarre, and meant to appeal to news journalists seeking information.  It was cited in many newspapers as a genuine quote before its removal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/id/30699302/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/student-hoaxes-worlds-media-wikipedia/#.WLNTW5ArLrc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Had Fitzgerald not confessed to the lie and informed major newspapers, it is likely that the quote would have been cited to one of them.  In the days following, only one newspaper (''[[The Guardian]]'') publicly apologized for the use of a source that can be a tool for duping the public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/may/04/journalism-obituaries-shane-fitzgerald&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other newspapers, such as the [[Washington Post]], simply deleted their articles from online archives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==False claim about Brent Bozell==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2007, [[Brent Bozell]] described this falsehood in Wikipedia:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.mrc.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2007/col20070320.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The other day, [[Bernie Goldberg]] emailed me, upset. He pointed me to his Wikipedia entry. To read what was written was to conclude that apparently I must hate his guts. But we are friends. He is a man for whom I have profound respect, professional and personal. He knew there was foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right there on the screen, under the heading &amp;quot;Criticism,&amp;quot; it stated that I had attacked him, &amp;quot;claiming that Goldberg merely lifted material he had been producing for years, and only published the book because he had an ax to grind with his former employers and was attempting to make a 'quick buck,' noting that Goldberg never mentioned the alleged liberal bias of the media until it was 'convenient' and 'profitable' for him to do so.&amp;quot;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In fact, those words have never been uttered by me. The accusation would be false. Back in 1996, Goldberg used the op-ed pages of ''The Wall Street Journal'' publicly to castigate his own network for its one-sided oafish bashing of [[Steve Forbes]].  It was anything but &amp;quot;convenient&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;profitable&amp;quot; for him. It ruined his friendship with [[Dan Rather]] and put him on a path to the outer fringes of CBS News. Ultimately, it ruined his newscaster career.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My attorney contacted Wikipedia by email demanding the removal of this false entry. No response. So we edited out the offensive material ourselves, after which in writing counsel alerted Wikipedia to the legal action that might befall them should this be repeated. Here's full disclosure, Wikipedia-style: You can see how each article is altered, sometimes hour by hour, in its &amp;quot;History&amp;quot; section. But there is no mention of the attorney's complaints. In the Goldberg article's history, an editor simply now scolds: &amp;quot;Bozell's article is a mock-jealous swipe at Goldberg's opportunism. PLEASE REREAD IT.&amp;quot; (Capitals theirs.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Goldberg and I are not alone. The website Conservapedia.com has a [[Bias in Wikipedia|long list]] of 41 allegations of bias and factual errors at Wikipedia. You can add to that the problem with the credentials of its staff. One of its editors, named only &amp;quot;Essjay&amp;quot; online and described on his user profile &amp;quot;as a tenured professor of religion at a private university with expertise in canon law,&amp;quot; was recently exposed as a 24-year-old college kid in Kentucky. He resigned in disgrace — even though Wikipedia tried to retain him, claiming he'd edited thousands of articles with flair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of apologizing to Brent Bozell, '''Wikipedia instead says &amp;quot;Bozell points to Conservapedia as a resource that documents Wikipedia's faults in this regard, presumably holding it as a more authoritative reference less vulnerable to vandalism.&amp;quot;'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brent_Bozell accessed April 1, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rewriting its own history==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Associated Press and others credit Larry Sanger as the co-founder of Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/tech/2007/mar/25/032502465.html&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But the Associated Press quotes Jimmy Wales as denying it:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;When you write this up please do not uncritically repeat Sanger's absurd claim to be the co-founder of Wikipedia.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I know of no one who was there at the company at the beginning who would think it anything other than laughable,&amp;quot; he added. This is an interesting comment, considering that Larry Sanger takes credit for coining the name, &amp;quot;Wikipedia.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_20#Sorry.2C_Jimbo.2C_but_not_buying_it. User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 20, Larry Sanger 03:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I am not bent out of shape about it,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;quot;The facts are on my side, which is why I bother so little about it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Associated Press, Jimmy Wales &amp;quot;has repeatedly tried to address this - even going so far as editing his own Wikipedia biography to tone down credit for Sanger. Such autobiographical contributions are frowned upon in Wikipedia's community, and Wales apologized after his changes were noticed and publicized by blogger Rogers Cadenhead in 2005.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wales' booking agent for speaking engagements claims that Wales is &amp;quot;the founder&amp;quot; of Wikipedia, which results in surprised clients when that claim is challenged. The false &amp;quot;founder&amp;quot; claim is on Wales' webpage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://jimmywales.com/about-jimmy/|title=About Jimmy|accessdate=February 6, 2015}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jimmy Wales has admitted that certain administrators, contrary to their own rules, have at times completely removed editing evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Seigenthaler scandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In early October 2005, a prominent and respected journalist [[John Seigenthaler Sr.]], contacted Wikipedia founder [[Jimmy Wales]] about false and libelous content in his biographical entry.  Essjay, a 24-year-old Wikipedia Administrator who was advancing rapidly in the organization, was dispatched to handle the situation.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;User:Essjay/Letter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=User:Essjay/Letter User:Essjay/Letter].  Retrieved from WikiTruth, November 3, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An anonymous contributor added to Seigenthaler's biography the previous May,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;John Seigenthaler Sr. was the assistant to Attorney General [[Robert Kennedy]] in the early 1960s. For a short time, he was thought to have been directly involved in the Kennedy assassinations of both [[John F. Kennedy|John]], and his brother, Bobby. Nothing was ever proven,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;John Seigenthaler moved to the [[Soviet Union]] in 1971, and returned to the [[United States]] in 1984. He started one of the country's largest public relations firms shortly thereafter.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales told Seigenthaler that Wikipedia is &amp;quot;accountable&amp;quot; and corrects mistakes immediately, but that the internet service provider of the anonymous user probably would not be helpful in identifying who placed the content.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Seigenthaler's Op-Eds&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.journalism.org/node/1673 Seigenthaler's Op-Eds], October 1, 2005.  Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org November 12, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Accountability activist [[Daniel Brandt]], a victim of a spurious biographical entry by Wikipedia Administrators, identified the place of employment of the anonymous user, and from there the person accountable was identified.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journalism.cf.ac.uk/2006/online/index.php?id=parse-195-0-0-251&amp;amp;article=336&amp;amp;author=India+Camm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler returned to the editorial pages of ''USA Today'' from which he retired as its first editorial manager to write an Op-Ed piece critical of Wikipedia and the threat it poses to free speech due of its overt provocation of government regulation, its irresponsible self-regulation and lack of accountability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm A false Wikipedia 'biography'], By John Seigenthaler, ''USA Today'', 11/29/2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== CNN interview ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 5, 2005 Wales and Seigenthaler appeared on [[CNN]]. An exchange between CNN moderator [[Kyra Phillips]] and Wales went like this:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|PHILLIPS:...I ran my name. I was shocked to see what was under my name. ...I'm telling you right now, Jimmy, that's not how I want people to see me and understand me. And what I'm about, and what I write about in my interviews, ''et cetera''. So, you know, it's not just individuals like John, but me and many other people, that just have concerns that this is creating gossip that can be very harmful. And people go to these sites thinking that this is the truth.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|WALES: Well, I mean, I think the real key is that the site matures over time, the -- all of the articles are edited over and over and over, and improved. Anyone's free to contribute. You're free to go and contribute.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This in fact is not the case.  Phillips was not free to remove objectionable content within her biographical entry, as Daniel Brandt at that exact moment was discovering.  Not four days prior, Wales told ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' magazine regarding Brandt's objections to a false Wikipedia biography created by Wikipedia Administrators about him, &amp;quot;I find it hard to take him very seriously at all,&amp;quot; and libelous slanders remained in Brandt's biography for a year and half. Wales told CNN, &amp;quot;we are very, very responsive to complaints and concerns.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler told the audience &amp;quot;with accountability comes credibility&amp;quot; and expressed fear that, &amp;quot;I'm afraid we're going to get regulated media as a result.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0512/05/lol.02.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 9, Seigenthaler appeared on C-SPAN's ''Washington Journal'' with Brian Lamb and articulated his concern that members of Congress or other powerful figures in government may likewise be targeted.  On November 2, 2006, days before the mid-term Congressional elections, an anonymous IP address traced to the ''[[New York Times]]'' changed [[U.S. House of Representatives]] [[Majority Leader]] [[Tom DeLay]]'s Wikipedia biographical entry from &amp;quot;a prominent member of the [[Republican Party]]&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Grand Dragon of the Republican Party.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tom_DeLay&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=85320018 Wikipedia/Tom DeLay, Revision as of 20:19, 2 November 2006, IP 199.181.174.146]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/name2ip.php?orgname=New+York+Times&amp;amp;location= WikiScanner]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler wrote a more expansive column in the ''The Tennessean'' after the November 30 ''USA Today'' piece appeared, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|a sudden stream of invective — homophobic, anti-Semitic and racist — spilled, as if from a sewer, onto the Wikipedia page under my name. ..It identified me as ...a &amp;quot;Nazi,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;fascist-oriented&amp;quot; ....murderer ...there also was the profile picture of Adolf Hitler over the caption, &amp;quot;Press photo of Seigenthaler.&amp;quot; The accompanying line: &amp;quot;He is secretly responsible for killing all the Jews.&amp;quot; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accountability and Section 230 ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wikifascists.JPG|thumb|275px|right|From Wikipedia Watch. [http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/] The inscription reads,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ''&amp;quot;Two wikifascists find someone without a biography.&amp;quot;'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Upon his retirement from ''USA Today'', Seigenthaler founded the First Amendment Center, an organization dedicated to a national dialogue about [[First Amendment]] rights and values. Seigenthaler criticized passage of [[Section 230]] of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Section 230 states that &amp;quot;no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker.&amp;quot; Unlike print and broadcast companies, internet service providers (ISP's) cannot be sued for disseminating defamatory attacks on citizens posted by others. Seigenthaler noted [[Jimbo Wales]] told [[Brian Lamb]] in a  [[C-SPAN]] interview that Wikipedia is accountable and that mistakes are corrected within minutes, but the false information remained in Seigenthaler's biography for five months. Seigenthaler concluded, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|And so we live in a universe of new media with phenomenal opportunities for worldwide communications and research — but populated by volunteer vandals with poison-pen intellects.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A false Wikipedia 'biography', By John Seigenthaler, ''USA Today'', 11/29/2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of ''Zeran v. AOL'', Zeran sued AOL for refusing to screen and remove defamatory messages, even after Zeran notified the ISP of their existence. The lower court ruled for the service provider and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the decision, noting that the intent of Section 230 was to (1) remove incentives on service providers to restrict speech on the Internet and (2) encourage self-regulation by service providers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=916529&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adl.org/Civil_Rights/newcyber.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An American citizen who posts material on the Internet that is illegal in a foreign country could be prosecuted if he subjected himself to the jurisdiction of that country. Internet users who export material that is illegal, that is to say, post material that is accessible and illegal in some foreign countries may be subject to prosecution in that country. However, under American law, the United States will not extradite a person for engaging in a constitutionally protected activity even if that activity violates a criminal law elsewhere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rjayco.com/obrien/nazism.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Essjay given oversight ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See Main article: [[Wikipedia:The Essjay scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Essjay wrote a professor to persuade her to allow her students to use Wikipedia as a viable source of information and posted a verbatim copy of the email for others to use.  Essjay stated, &amp;quot;I was the administrator who deleted the inappropriate revisions when Mr. Seigenthaler contacted our founder, [[Jimmy Wales]]; it is quite unfortunate that a relatively minor issue on a relatively minor figure has provided so much negative publicity.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;User:Essjay/Letter&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Seigenthaler noted in his Op-Ed piece, &amp;quot;The motive for the salacious stuff directed at me is reasonably obvious,&amp;quot; and quoted some comments, &amp;quot;We all at Wikipedia think he (Seigenthaler) is a horrible, stupid p...k for complaining about small inaccuracies in his biography.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Seigenthaler's Op-Eds&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others said, &amp;quot;Mr. Seigenthaler's attitude and actions are reprehensible and ill-formed,&amp;quot; and “if there is an error whether large or small, he can correct it.”  This again, was not true.  Even prior to the Wikipedia policy, '''Biographies of Living Persons''', [[conflict of interest]] restrictions existed on the subject of an article editing their own entry. Another wrote: &amp;quot;Rather than fixing the article himself, he made a legal threat.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/02/12/bias_sabotage_haunt_wikipedias_free_world/?page=3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Seigraph.gif|400px|thumb|right|The Seigenthaler scandal was viewed as &amp;quot;the best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia&amp;quot; as curiosity seekers to view the [[misinformation]] skyrocketed Alexa rankings.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the damage to an innocent person and divulgence of Wikipedia's precarious claim as a viable source, the Seigenthaler scandal was viewed as a triumph and considered &amp;quot;the best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Seigenthaler,_Sr.#The_best_thing_that_ever_happened_to_Wikipedia Talk:John Seigenthaler Sr.#The best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia], retrieved 23 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; catapulting it into a top ten most visited website as curiosity seekers responded to the negative publicity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikipediareview.com/lofiversion/index.php?t1100.html Wikipedia: A Nightmare Of Libel and Slander], Joel Leyden, Israel News Agency, 8 May 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scandal was originally billed as a &amp;quot;hoax&amp;quot;, then &amp;quot;controversy,&amp;quot; then downgraded to &amp;quot;incident,&amp;quot; and now re-upgraded to &amp;quot;controversy,&amp;quot; evidently in response to criticism.  The Wikipedia entry on &amp;quot;Seigenthaler controversy&amp;quot; contains [[disinformation]], making the claim, &amp;quot;After the incident, Wikipedia took steps to prevent a recurrence, including barring unregistered users from creating new pages.&amp;quot;  No actions were ever taken to require disclosure of the real life identities of contributors.  Barring unregistered users from creating new pages had nothing to do with the Seigenthaler scandal—the page already existed when an anonymous IP added the false information.  Registration of accounts requires no accountability of the real life identity of the contributor.  Indeed, many experienced Wikipedia editors and Administrators have dozens of registered accounts, called &amp;quot;sockpuppet accounts.&amp;quot;  Protecting the identities of anonymous high-level Administrators has always been more of a priority to the WikiMedia Foundation than the propagation of false information about real life persons whose identities are known.  Wales was asked by ''BusinessWeek'' magazine, “Why do you feel it is important to allow contributors and site administrators to remain anonymous?” Wales responded, “there are definitely people working in Wikipedia who may have privacy reasons for not wanting their name on the site….there are lots of reasons for privacy online that aren’t nefarious.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2005/tc20051214_441708.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the Seigenthaler case, it was the odd circumstance that a victim of false information had a large enough platform to respond, coupled with the welcome fact that the victim fundamentally opposes government regulation of internet speech.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's &amp;quot;Seigenthaler controversy&amp;quot; also states, &amp;quot;The Foundation added a new level of &amp;quot;oversight&amp;quot; features to the MediaWiki software,[12] accessible as of 2006 to around 20 experienced editors nominated by Wales,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler_Sr._Wikipedia_biography_controversy#Wikimedia_Foundation_reaction Seigenthaler controversy#Wikimedia Foundation reaction].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; one of whom was Essjay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ban on anonymous page creation “reform” was abandoned less than two years later as Wikipedia's usage and ratings slumped in the wake of yet more scandals and questions about Wikipedia's culture, core content policies, and endemic lack of accountability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/084292.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brandt / Berlet feud==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See Main article: [[Wikipedia:The Daniel Brandt controversy]]&lt;br /&gt;
An ugly [[far-left]] sectarian dispute&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://spencer.lib.ku.edu/exhibits/wilcox/5.html Laird Wilcox], ''The Watchdogs: A Close Look at Anti-Racist &amp;quot;Watchdog&amp;quot; Groups'', Second Edition, Part 2, Editorial Research Service, 1999, p. 21. ISBN 0-993592-96-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; reared its head in 2005 with disastrous consequences for the site's credibility. The feud had been dormant for many years until the need to elevate a “controversial and notable expert” above the level of “partisan and extreme” defined by its own policies became apparent which would have precluded the so-called “expert” as &amp;quot;a source for anything other than himself,” as Wikipedia's ever fluid policies dictate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daniel Brandt, founder of Namebase,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.namebase.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Google Watch, and Wikipedia Watch, removed Chip Berlet from his Board of Advisors in 1991 when Berlet refused to sit on the same Board which included Fletcher Prouty.&amp;quot;  Prouty, a retired Air Force colonel whose intelligence career stretched back to accompanying President [[Franklin Roosevelt]] to the [[Teheran conference]], was allegorically portrayed as the mysterious “Man X”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/lfprouty.htm Leroy Fletcher Prouty, Jr., Colonel, United States Air Force], [[Arlington National Cemetery]] Website, Retrieved November 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by Donald Southerland in  [[Oliver Stone]]'s film, [[JFK]]. A Brandt biographical page was created using Berlet as the source for unsavory attacks on Brandt.  Brandt describes himself as an &amp;quot;accountability activist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/04/your_take_roundupbelievers_neg.html Believers, Negativists Debate Wikipedia’s Trustworthiness], by Mark Glaser, 20 April 2006. Retrieved from pbs.org October 29, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Daniel_Brandt Wikiquote/Daniel Brandt#Sourced]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and claims he originally began working with Wikipedia editors in good faith during October 2005 but any biographical information he revealed was spun against him to depict him in a negative light.  Brandt states,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I soon realized that it was also about Berlet, who was still bent on undermining me. Berlet was using Wikipedia as part of his political agenda, and he was successful in this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=5641&amp;amp;st=40&amp;amp;p=21441&amp;amp;mode=linear#entry21441&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Berlet's biography underwent an extensive revision with most of the substantive NPOV criticism cut out.  The revising editor commented, &amp;quot;I kept Daniel Brandt, not because I feel he's a credible source, but because there's so little published criticism of Berlet, that I felt I had to retain something.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=9161554 Chip Berlet/Talk, SlimVirgin 00:19, 7 January 2005].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is an extraordinary statement and raises the question why the same high-level Administrator and author of several of Wikipedia's core content and citation policies, including '''Wikipedia:Reliable Sources''' and '''Wikipedia:Biographies of Living Persons''' ('''BLP'''),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;en.wikipedia.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons&amp;amp;diff=31947681&amp;amp;oldid=31753956&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; would use a source she did not consider credible. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies of living persons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia:Biographies of Living Persons (WP:BLP) policy did not come into being because of the Seigenthaler scandal, but rather over the Brandt controversy, as the originating editor noted in an edit summary.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;en.wikipedia.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Brandt requested Wikipedia delete his biographical entry, and ceased working with editors he suspected of working to further the propagation of false information about him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' magazine bills itself as the nation's oldest trade journal serving the newspaper industry with roots dating back to 1884.  Wikipedia founder [[Jimmy Wales]] responded to questions from ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' in a prepared statement on December 1, 2005 about Daniel Brandt saying,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I don't regard him as a valid source about anything at all&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/article_brief/eandp/1/1001612839 Wikipedia Founder, Readers Respond to Seigenthaler Article], Jay DeFoore, ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'', December 01, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales comments added '''undue weight'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:UNDUE#Undue_weight&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ('''WP:UNDUE''') to criticism of Brandt when placed within his biographical entry. Brandt demanded accountability from the army of unidentified Wikipedia Administrators furthering Chip Berlet's agenda to destroy Brandt's credibility, and elevate Berlet's own as a Wikipedia &amp;quot;expert.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:294577483 90fd22f5cd m.jpg|thumb|300px|right|From '''WikiTruth''', the inscription reads,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;''The Big Bad Brandt is Gonna Getcha!'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Brandt became known as the scourge of the Wikipedia Admin community.  WikiTruth says in its ''Brandt the Boogeyman'' entry,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|he dates back to a time when people would look up facts in books and would verify information without just doing a copy and paste from an AP news article and thinking they were done. He compares writing styles, he calls government agencies, and he writes letters. And when he's done, he tends to know. Or at least, he knows where he stands in terms of information. He's rather tenacious about getting stuff right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia, of course, doesn't do this much at all: depending on the day, they'll laud a link to a website as being absolutely useless (it's on the WEB, of course) and then the next minute link to a different website to back a &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; up. Citing books and printed materials is often a no-go, because nobody can read the original citation, so it gets swept away as well. Really, you have no idea what's good and what's bad, and it's all one big happy soup-hug. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, guys like Daniel Brandt are horrible for Wikipedia: he researches. He finds laws that pertain to situations. He asks the tough questions that could upset the whole Wiki-cart.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia continues to publish inaccurate and defamatory articles about living persons, written by anonymous contributors, based on other unreliable sources, and refuses to withdraw or change them. The victims of its libels have no legal means of compelling Wikipedia to make any changes. It is not answerable to any court or libel laws and simply behaves as if it is above the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Wordbomb Saga==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Patrick byrne overstock small.jpg|thumb|right|Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne [http://www.overstock.com/Patrick-Byrne-and-naked-short-selling/7371/static.html]]]&lt;br /&gt;
One of Wikipedia's most bitter and drawn-out disputes, chronicled in ''The Register,''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; centers around the assertion by representatives of Overstock.com&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.overstock.com/community&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that a [[Mainstream media|mainstream financial journalist]] Gary Weiss had been editing Wikipedia to impose his point of view on a series of articles relevant to the company. Weiss was once a reporter with BusinessWeek, in 2007 became a columnist with Forbes, and had for over 10 years been posting under fake names to confuse, distort, hijack Usenet groups, stock message boards, and Wikipedia, to prevent the public from understanding criminal activity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deepcapture.com/gary-weiss-scaramouch-psychopath/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Weiss was notorious around the Internet for his public feud with Overstock&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://garyweiss.blogspot.com/2007/05/overstockcoms-ethical-dilemma.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and its CEO [[Patrick Byrne]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://allantyoung.com/2008/09/22/patrick-byrne-vindicated/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ridiculing their campaign against the controversial practice of [[Naked Short Selling]].   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006, Judd Bagley, an ally of Overstock's Patrick Byrne having interviewed the CEO for a personal project, began editing Wikipedia to counter what was perceived to be a skewed representation of Naked Short Selling and Overstock.com. He was swiftly dispatched by influential Wikipedia administrators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after, Bagley became Overstock's Director of Communications, and embarked on an aggressive campaign to publicize the dispute on various websites, aiming to expose the administrators he held responsible for protecting Weiss. Using the moniker “Wordbomb”, Bagley presented evidence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://antisocialmedia.net/final-word-on-weiss/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; suggesting that not only was Gary Weiss editing Wikipedia using the name “User:Mantanmoreland“,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mantanmoreland&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but that he was operating other accounts to manipulate consensus and protect his interests in the dispute.  Mantanmoreland violated Wikipedia policies against Conflict of Interest and No Self Promotion by creating an article about himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gary_Weiss&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=48341962&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Bagley proved Weiss had edited Wikipedia from one of two main IPs used by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dtcc.com/about/business/index.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the organization charged with settling about a quadrillion stock trades each year. The DTCC is also the organization Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne said acts an enabler of perpetrators of illegal naked short selling of many public companies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=10360&amp;amp;st=0&amp;amp;p=36485&amp;amp;mode=linear#entry36485&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia responded to Bagley's campaign in typical schoolyard fashion. The dispute was escalated by a small clique of powerful Wikipedians who seemed less interested in the truth of Bagley's assertions, and more concerned with attacking perceived threats to the status quo at Wikipedia. With the approval of [[Jimbo Wales]], administrators sided with “Mantanmoreland” / Gary Weiss, and anointed Bagley / Wordbomb an “Enemy Of The Wiki” who needed to be silenced — a “stalker” and a “harasser” for publicizing the details of the person who had been editing relevant articles on Wikipedia, and the people who had been stopping him from doing the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For nearly two years, Bagley's name was invoked to inspire paranoia in the Wikipedia Admin Community to keep questioning editors in line. It became a textbook case for analysis of the intense group-think Wikipedia has become notorious for.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Judd bagley overstock.jpg|thumb|left|175px|Judd Bagley was made a target at the highest levels of Wikipedia and became a victim of a global [[witchhunt]] by the Wikipedia Admin Community for daring to expose an unholy alliance of abuse and [[corruption]] on [[Wall Street]] and in the Wikipedia cabal. [http://antisocialmedia.net/] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Bagley was repeatedly disparaged&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=15897&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by a cabal of out-of-control administrators such as Guy Chapman, who denounced Bagley as “lunatic” and “evil” when it suited. UK Wikimedia representative David Gerard banned an entire area of Utah to prevent Bagley raising his issues and made personally disparaging remarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:David_Gerard/archive_5#User:204.15.84.2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia Arbitrator Fred Bauder claimed that Bagley's blog AntiSocialMedia.net showed “moral depravity”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision&amp;amp;diff=158954587&amp;amp;oldid=158809362&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for challenging the Wiki-elite. Administrator Phil Sandifer dismissed Bagley in highly personal and offensive language while boasting&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083509.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that he himself had become a “powerful and trusted administrator on the 9th biggest website in the world.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other editors who raised Overstock's quite legitimate complaints were banned as proxies of Judd Bagley. Paranoia had taken such a hold that editors with productive records from all over the US, and as far afield as Europe and Asia found themselves accused of being Bagley. When the editor Cla68&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Cla68&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; questioned the issue of Gary Weiss editing Wikipedia, he was swiftly blocked by administrator Durova on the orders of Jimbo Wales who wrote,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gary_Weiss&amp;amp;diff=165916446&amp;amp;oldid=165916313&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; “Durova and Guy have my full support here. No nonsense, zero tolerance, shoot on sight. No kidding, this has gone on long enough”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SirFozzie/Investigation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; undertaken by concerned administrators into the editing patterns of “Mantanmoreland” came to fruition. Despite the “Mantanmoreland” account ceasing edits on Overstock / Naked Short Selling articles in September 2007, the study revealed evidence beyond reasonable doubt that the same person had been operating several accounts to “control” articles. Thus affirming Bagley's claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More worryingly for good faith Wikipedians was the revelation&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikback.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&amp;amp;Number=2762#Post2757&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/01/wikipedia_and_naked_shorting/print.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Jimbo Wales, alongside leading administrators, had considered that this person was almost certainly Gary Weiss in a private discussion as long ago as September 2007 (the same month the “Mantanmoreland” account quit editing the relevant articles). Meaning that behind the scenes, they were admitting that Bagley was probably right all along, yet in public were vilifying or blocking anyone who publicly stated so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the [[financial meltdown of 2008]], the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] issued directives aimed at curbing abusive naked short selling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.philly.com/inquirer/business/20090728_SEC_short-selling_rule_is_permanent.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Patrick Byrne has been widely recognized as in the forefront of the movement aimed at curbing such abuses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/?q=node/425&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Michael Moore==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Moorecagan.JPG|right|thumb|200px|Moore with [[Leslie Cagan]] [[United For Peace and Justice]] [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=629] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The website MichaelMoore.com, dissatisfied with a Wikipedia editor's edits to ''[[Sicko]]'', published an image of a Wikipedia user on its main page. This was combined with links to edit both ''Sicko'' and the editor's user page.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision#Michael_Moore]  Several Wikipedia editors and Administrators regarded this action on the part of [[Michael Moore]]'s official website as an egregious violation of a well publicized ruling to protect Wikipedia editors from outside harassment. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore_2] The consensus, per Wikipedia's policy was to remove links from Wikipedia to Michael Moore's attack site which was urging vengeance and reprisals against an editor who posted criticism of Moore's film.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Arbitration, Wikipedia's internal policy making and dispute resolution arm, the Arbitration chairman publicly admitted,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|No question it contained an attack, including a link to edit our user's page. The problem is that many of us like Michael Moore very much and don't care much for the viewpoint of the user involved. Applying our policy in a rote manner (Without consideration of '''the unwritten rule that we support prominent subjects that we like''') yields removal of the link (At least while it contained the personal attack).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikien-1 [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082980.html Harassment sites], Fred Bauder, Sun Oct 14 19:03:28 UTC 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View (NPOV), laid down by founder Jimbo Wales allegedly is &amp;quot;absolute and non-negotiable.&amp;quot; Few people find the claim convincing.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#_note-0] The ArbCom chairman further stated, &amp;quot;Obviously we need to make an exception for prominent people whose viewpoint we support.&amp;quot; [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082987.html] When asked, &amp;quot;How, then, is this remotely compatible with NPOV?&amp;quot;, the ArbCom chairman responded, &amp;quot;Not at all.&amp;quot; [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082993.html] The editor whom Michaelmoore.com was urging its viewers to attack and harass is described as &amp;quot;a Fellow at the [[American Enterprise Institute]], a [[conservative]] [[think tank]].&amp;quot;[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083230.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sinbad hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
On March 16, 2007, Wikipedia entry on the 50-year old entertainer Sinbad, born David Adkins, stated: &amp;quot;He succumbed to a fatal heart attack on the morning of March 14, 2007.&amp;quot;  This hoax was widely reported in the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ioltechnology.co.za/article_page.php?iSectionId=2891&amp;amp;iArticleId=3734818&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Robert Clark Young revenge edits==&lt;br /&gt;
From 2006 to 2013, Robert Clark Young, an author who had only published one novel to mixed reviews, edited Wikipedia extensively with 13,000 edits under username &amp;quot;Qworty.&amp;quot;  He engaged in aggressive behavior making revenge edits to biographical articles of his rival authors and other people against whom he held grudges. He also puffed up his own Wikipedia autobiography, and repeatedly denied that he was connected to Young.  He also created other single purpose accounts to further his campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Geri_Litton|title=Geri Litton sockpuppet investigation|date=2007|accessdate=July 11, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Qworty/Archive|title=Quorty sockpuppet inviestigant|date=2013|accessdate=July 11, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Only after his true identity was revealed in a salon.com article,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/|title=Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia|date=May 17, 2013|work=salon.com|accessdate=July 9, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was Young banned&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive797#User:Qworty|title=Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive797|accessdate=July 9, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and efforts made to reverse his vindictive edits.  In essence, he would remove favorable items from the biographies of his enemies or nominate them for deletion. The salon.com article concluded,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But Qworty’s example tells us that even when people call attention to a rogue editor, even when that editor’s temper tantrums come to the attention of the founder of Wikipedia, it’s quite possible that no action will be taken.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rutgers-Ivy League hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
A Wikipedia entry falsely stated that Rutgers was once invited to join the Ivy League.  Although that false statement was eventually removed from Wikipedia, it was not removed before the ''Daily News'' relied on it in this story:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't have to define your college with your football team, but Rutgers long ago decided to give it a try. Back in 1954, when it was considered a 'public Ivy,' Rutgers might have joined the fledgling Ivy League and altered its destiny. But the school declined the offer - arguably the dumbest mistake in its history. Ever since then, Rutgers has scrambled to prove itself worthy of playing football with the big boys.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bondy, Filip. &amp;quot;They Can Finally Say They Belong Here&amp;quot;, New York Daily News, 2006-11-10, p. 92. Retrieved on 2006-12-13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barbara Bauer vs. Wikimedia Foundation==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikimedia Foundation is one of 17 defendants in a lawsuit suit filed in New Jersey, by Barbara Bauer and her literary agency.  Her Wikipedia article was deleted on March 25, 2007 by Wikipedia administrator Doc Glasgow as a &amp;quot;bloody disgrace&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wikipedia-watch.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauertc.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{dead link}}&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wikipedia-watch.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauert1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauert2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{dead link}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==GFDL License Issue==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's practice of complete deletion of articles&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&amp;amp;page=Brian+Peppers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without reference to the original article, the author(s)/publisher(s) of the article, and the history and title(s) of the article, including modification history, description and appropriate dates, is a direct violation of at least GFDL version 1.2.  Additionally, the GFDL License states that if the article/document contains Copyright notices, that said notices must be preserved at all times. If those notices are removed, then they are in violation of Copyright Law, as well as the terms of the GFDL license.  Furthermore, the question of them removing anything outright at all comes into quite a grey area. If one reads the GFDL License literally, then it implies that once the article document is posted, it is in distribution, and technical measures are not allowed to be taken to prevent the use of the document in question, and that no other conditions whatsoever can be added by the user to those of the GFDL license.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Wikipocalypse:GF'DL&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html#TOC1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, beginning June 15, 2009, the Wikimedia Foundation began transitioning content on Wikipedia to be dual-licensed under both the GFDL and Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-06-15/News_and_notes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Censorship==&lt;br /&gt;
Among the many userboxes that are used by editors in Wikipedia, there is one that claims &amp;quot;Wikipedia is not censored&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Disavian/Userboxes/Not_Censored &amp;quot;Wikipedia is not censored&amp;quot; userbox] at Wikipedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is a lie, as Wikipedia routinely engages in censorship against any edits [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia|its editors and administrators do not like for political/ideological reasons]] (particularly involving political articles, the &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot; article, the [[GamerGate]] controversy article and articles involving gender-confused individuals and those claiming to be &amp;quot;non-binary&amp;quot;) and its leftist editors/administrators have been very quick to revert/censor such edits and to quickly block editors who make such edits to fit reality instead of the leftist editors' personal and ideological preference, wishful thinking and political correctness in defiance of reality and logic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cyberbullying==&lt;br /&gt;
The press have reported on incidents of [[cyberbullying]] on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news| url=http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/29/local/me-wikipedia29 | work=Los Angeles Times | first=Molly | last=Hennessy-Fiske | title=Wikipedia threats went unchecked – Los Angeles Times | date=29 April 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ABCLocal&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=6087243 Hacienda Heights school receives possible threat | abc7.com&amp;lt;!-- Bot generated title --&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news |title=Student arrested for violent threats on Wikipedia |first= |last= |url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2008/04/wiki.html?cid=6a00d8341c630a53ef011571abd811970b |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=29 April 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An editor threatened an Asian student at the Glen A. Wilson High School in 2008,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ABCLocal&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and a 14-year-old boy was arrested for making a threat against Niles West High School on Wikipedia in 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.pantagraph.com/news/article_baef01f3-e56f-52e1-b9af-e90eb83e811b.html|title=Teen charged after threat to school on Wikipedia|date=31 October 2006|agency=Associated Press  |publisher=Pantagraph.com|accessdate=26 January 2011|location=Bloomington, IL}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
María Sefidari, the female Chair of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Directors, is involved in a lesbian relationship with Wikipedia editor Laura Hale, which creates an inherent conflict of interest in the following controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.canberra.edu.au/researchrepository/items/d2d1d08e-20c3-4781-9072-57c8960c6c91/1/introductory_pages.pdf?attachment.uuid=a046d5df-9395-4700-a345-ebda1f122cc6|title=Thesis Acknowledgements|page=4|accessdate=July 15, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Ms. Hale has a long history, dating back to 2011 of incompetent edits and abusing male editors while making false accusations of &amp;quot;misogyny&amp;quot; against editors who correct her edits.  A long-time male administrator, Fram, followed Ms. Hale around making corrections to her problematic edits.  In turn, Ms. Hale complained to the Trust &amp;amp; Security staff of the Wikimedia Foundation, rather than to the volunteer-staffed complaint mechanisms on Wikipedia.  Although the Trust &amp;amp; Security staff has previously banned a few editors for problems involving illegal conduct such as pedophilia, in June 2019, for the first time, they suspended Fram for one year for alleged &amp;quot;incivility&amp;quot;.  In response, an English Wikipedia administrator lifted the block and was in turn stripped of his administratorship by the Foundation, and several other administrators resigned in protest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_response_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation%27s_ban_of_Fram|title=Wikipedia:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram|accessdate=June 24, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to a Buzzfeed article about the controversy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/josephbernstein/wikipedia-ban-editor-culture-war|title=The Culture War Has Finally Come For Wikipedia|date=July 27, 2019|accessdate=July 28, 2019|work=Buzzfeed News}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikimedia Foundation executive director Katharine Maher sent a tweet calling the article &amp;quot;s***ty&amp;quot;, which drew heavy criticism against her on her Twitter account from other Wikipedia editors for what they indicated was her dismissive and elitist attitude toward those opposed to the Foundation's unilateral abuse of power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://twitter.com/krmaher/status/1144394019893460993|title=tweet|accessdate=June 28, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As more Wikipedia Administrators and Bureaucrats resign or go on strike, the crisis has also been reported by Breitbart.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/06/28/wikipedia-editors-revolt-over-sites-ban-of-veteran-administrator/|title=Wikipedia Editors Revolt over Site’s Ban of Veteran Administrator|date=July 28, 2019|work=Breitbart|accessdate=July 28, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikipedia on bestiality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Wikipedia on bestiality]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted earlier, the Wikipedia project was initiated by [[atheism|atheists]] and [[entrepreneur]] Jimmy Wales and the [[agnosticism|agnostic]] [[philosophy]] [[professor]] [[Larry Sanger]] on January 15, 2001.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/lists/288/000092012/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. As of July 18, 2012, Wikipedia's article on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia zoophilia/bestiality] has an entire section on &amp;quot;arguments for zoophilia&amp;quot; plus pictures depicting zoophilia as well as a section on &amp;quot;arguments against zoophilia&amp;quot;. As of September 24, 2011, Wikipedia has a &amp;quot;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_the_law Zoophilia and the law&amp;quot;] article which has a section on the impact of zoophilia laws where eight alleged negative impacts of zoophilia laws are given, but no positive impacts of the laws are given.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_the_law#Impact_of_laws|title=Impact of laws section of &amp;quot;Zoophilia and the law&amp;quot;|date=July 17, 2012|accessdate=July 18, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Trademarks and domain names ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) uses the licensing of its trademarks as a tool to control local chapters.  Although each local chapter is in theory an autonomous organization, each chapter signs a contract with the WMF as a condition for using its trademarks.  The WMF also tried to stake out control over many domain names that contain the word &amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot; including &amp;quot;[[wikileaks]]&amp;quot;.  WikiLeaks and Wikipedia have no affiliation with each other. (&amp;quot;Wiki&amp;quot; describes a type of website and is not a trademark.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiLeaks_is_not_part_of_Wikipedia |title=Wikipedia:WikiLeaks is not part of Wikipedia |work=Wikipedia |publisher=[[Wikimedia Foundation]] |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/wiki-giants-on-a-collision-course-over-shared-name-2065561.html |title=Wiki giants on a collision course over shared name |last1=Rawlinson |first1=Kevin |first2=Tom |last2=Peck |date=30 August 2010 |work=The Independent |location=London |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikia did purchase several WikiLeaks-related domain names (including wikileaks.com and wikileaks.net) as a &amp;quot;protective brand measure&amp;quot; in 2007.&amp;lt;ref name=wikia&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.wikia.com/Press:Wikia_Does_Not_Own_Wikileaks_Domain_Names |title=Press:Wikia Does Not Own Wikileaks Domain Names |work=[[Wikia]] |publisher=[[Wikia]] |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikia started to transfer those domain names to WikiLeaks on June 14, 2007, but the transfer was never completed, and Wikia held those domain names when the &amp;quot;Wikileaks scandal&amp;quot; broke.&amp;lt;ref name=wikia/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Humorous quotes concerning Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...dealing with the Wikipedians is like walking into a mental hospital: the floors are carpeted, the walls are nicely padded, but you know there’s a pretty good chance at any given moment one of the inmates will pick up a knife.” - quote from a ''[[New York Times]]'' article on Wikipedia written by the journalist and author Judith Newman&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/fashion/Wikipedia-Judith-Newman.html?smid=pl-share Wikipedia-Mania: Wikipedia, What Does Judith Newman Have to Do to Get a Page?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An article entitled ''Wikipedia Gridlocked by Wikipedia Nerds'' declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|So who are these Gatekeepers to all the internet's knowledge?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A survey the foundation conducted last year determined that the average age of an editor is 26.8 years, and that 87% of them are men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you suspected: [[nerd]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gawker.com/5410917/wikipedia-gridlocked-by-wikipedia-nerds&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jimmy Wales said the typical profile of a Wikipedia contributor is &amp;quot;a 26-year-old geeky male&amp;quot; who moves on to other ventures, gets married, and leaves the website.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/5397593/Wikipedia-losing-contributors-founder-says Wikipedia losing contributors, founder says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seth Meyers noted on his ''Late Night'' program, &amp;quot;Wikipedia is now accepting donations using the online currency Bitcoin. So now you can support information you're not sure is true with currency you're not sure is money.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thespec.com/living-story/4733681-tuesdayfile/ Retrieved August 8, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When obscure author Patrick Modiano was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in October 2014, few journalists knew much about him.  The person updating his Wikipedia biography to reflect the prize added this warning to the article, &amp;quot;To the Reporter Now Copying From Wikipedia: Be careful boy. Primary sources are still best for journos.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/10/09/nobel_prize_winner_patrick_modiano_s_wikipedia_page_changed_to_add_note.html|title=A Reminder to Journalists Writing About the New Nobel Prize Winner, From Wikipedia|first=Forrest |last=Wickman|date=October 9, 2014|work=Slate|accessdate=October 10, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_Modiano&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=628920987&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unbiased editor recruitment==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia claims that anyone can edit it.  That is true to an extent,but its editor pool is self-selecting.  However, on  January 25–29, 2012, the Wikimedia Foundation paid for Gregory Varnum and others to attend and staff a booth at the &amp;quot;24th National Conference on LGBT Equality: Creating Change&amp;quot; conference in Baltimore, Maryland.  The purpose of the Wikimedia booth was to recruit more LGBT activists to edit Wikipedia.  Although Wikimedia has outreach efforts at other conferences, there has been no outreach at conservative events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia editor [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch Sarah Stierch] was the volunteer moderator of the Gender Gap email list where she departed from discussing Wikipedia to freely share her negative experiences with men in her life.  In fall 2011, she was hired by the WMF as a Community Fellow to work on creating a &amp;quot;Teahouse&amp;quot; for newer Wikipedia editors. The report on the Teahouse Pilot Project&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Research:Teahouse/Pilot_Report&amp;amp;oldid=3832292|title=Teahouse: Pilot Report|date=June 14, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; explained, &amp;quot;If you click through to the Teahouse, it’s clearly aiming to broaden female participation - just look at the pastel background and references to tea.&amp;quot; Stierch tried to use Twitter to recruit more female editors into Teahouse and the English Wikipedia. The report concluded, &amp;quot;Because so much time and energy needed to be spend during the pilot on setting up and maintaining the space, we weren't able to focus as much as we'd have liked on gender-targeted strategies for recruiting female guests and hosts. There are clearly more experiments that need to be run in order to better integrate the space with other gender gap efforts and WikiWomen's calls to actions.&amp;quot;  The WMF terminated Stierch on January 9, 2014 following complaints of her moonlighting as a paid editor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-January/129466.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 18, 2014, during the Congressional summer recess, the [[Cato Institute]] and Wikimedia DC jointly conducted a seminar to encourage Congressional staff members to edit Wikipedia about pending legislation and policy issues.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/08/18/a-call-to-edit-congress-and-wikipedia-told-to-peacefully-co-exist/|title=A call to edit: Congress and Wikipedia told to peacefully co-exist|first=Nancy|last=Scola|date=August 18, 2014|accessdate=August 22, 2014|work=Washington Post}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.c-span.org/video/?321030-1/discussion-wikipedia-government-transparency|date=August 18, 2014|accessdate=August 22, 2014|title=Wikipedia and Congress|work=C-SPAN}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The panel discussion included Michelle Newby, a full-time Cato employee who edits Wikipedia as a part of her job.  She promised to work with any Congressional Staff that would be interested in editing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flaws in governance structure==&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps Wikipedia's greatest structural problem is Jimmy Wales' inability to remove himself from the process. He calls himself a &amp;quot;God-King&amp;quot; and rules the site with the style of [[monarchy]], robbing it of its potential to achieve some form of [[Jeffersonian]] [[democracy]] and accountability. Wales once speculated that all significant productivity emerged from his circle of a few hundred personal friends while the rest of the world groped along doing only spelling and punctuation mark corrections and other trivial modifications. The computer programmer and activist Aaron Swartz did a proper analysis and showed that the productivity was the results of many, many thousands of anonymous users. Swartz later committed [[suicide]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales delegated the run-of-the-mill decision-marking to a hand-picked group he called the Arbitration Committee. They take months to make any decisions and dole out multi-month to multi-year or permanent intervention solutions. A reputable encyclopedia usually simply chooses an Editor-in-Chief, i.e. one reputable, mature and experienced person with one mind to make high-quality decisions rapidly and perhaps dispense moderate penalties when needed. Sanger served as such, but Wales, an [[Objectivist]] economics major and former stock options trader, opted to drastically reduce his salary when it became clear that the project would be a success, thus forcing him out. Wales has since been making a living, in part, by promoting his notions of governance of Internet-based projects, often emphasizing that users should remain anonymous and thus without any serious form of credential or reputation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problems are in the structure and in the personality flaws of Wales himself. Wales takes advantage of this vast pool of free labor to hunt his perceived enemies, somewhat in the style of [[L. Ron Hubbard]] or other such supposed founders of movements.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equally important are the flawed steps that Wales took to separate the community of volunteer Wikipedia editors from the financial control of the enterprise.  The servers and software are owned by the [[Wikimedia Foundation]] (WMF), a non-profit organization that at first was set up as a membership organization, but quickly changed to a non-membership organization so that members would not have any legal say regarding the organization.  Although people who have made a required minimum number of edits per year can vote for members of the Arbitration Committee and for a minority of the WMF Board seats, at least one community-elected Board member was removed because he did not agree with the majority of the Board.  Of course, Wales is guaranteed a perpetual WMF Board seat as a co-founder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally, revenue from fundraising banners in the United States went to the WMF, but banner revenue in foreign countries went to the chapters located in those countries.  In recent years, the WMF has consolidated all fundraising revenues, with national chapters being forced to apply for specific grants from the WMF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To further complicate the financial controls, the WMF established a separate endowment at the [[Tides Foundation]] which is controlled by that foundation in consultation with an advisory board. Instead of having a community-selected advisory board or the entire WMF Board serving as the advisory board, the Tides Foundation appointed a new group with Wales and large donors serving.  When the endowment reaches its fundraising target, the advisory board decides whether the funds should stay at the Tides Foundation, be transferred to the WMF, or used in some other way.  So, if Wales has a falling out with the WMF Board over the next ten years, he and his hand-picked advisory board could take the Wikipedia endowment somewhere else. The editing community has no say in the endowment—who manages it or how the income will be spent.&lt;br /&gt;
==Core Policies==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia has three policies that it calls its core policies. These are Neutral Point of View, Verifiability, and No Original Research. Despite designating these three policies as &amp;quot;core&amp;quot;, Wikipedia barely even cares about them, especially with cases in regard to atheism. Wikipedia has reverted well-substantiated edits for disagreeing with atheism numerous times, gone several paragraphs on pro-atheism topics without citing a single source, banned Creation Ministries International employees for an indefinite amount of times despite said employees having not violated any written policy, and more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Wikipedia|Articles about '''Wikipedia''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:The Protocols of Ritual Defamation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia prejudice and KAL 007]] (Wikipedia deletion material related to [[New World Order]] and [[Larry McDonald]], touching [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]])&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Deletionpedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Wikipedia and Citizendium]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/aug/21/conservatives-miss-wikipedias-threat/ SHEFFIELD: Conservatives miss Wikipedia's threat] by [[Washington Times]], August 21, 2008 &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/print.html Wikipedia black helicopters circle Utah's Traverse Mountain], By Cade Metz, ''The Register'', 6 December 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/15/wikipedia_can_damage_your_grades/ Avoid Wikipedia, warns Wikipedia chief - It can seriously damage your grades] by Andrew Orlowski, ''The Register'', June 15, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/18/wikipedia_quality_problem/ Wikipedia founder admits to serious quality problems] by Andrew Orlowski, ''The Register'', October 18, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia Who Writes Wikipedia?] by Aaron Swartz, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/07/05/wikipedias-seven-worst-moments/ Wikipedia’s Seven Worst Moments] by Charlie Nash, ''Breitbart News'', July 5, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://evolutionnews.org/2017/11/wikipedia-and-astroturf/ Wikipedia and “Astroturf”] Sarah Chaffee, Evolution News. November 30, 2017 (Journalist [[Sharyl Attkisson]]).&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://oedb.org/ilibrarian/top-7-alternatives-to-wikipedia/  Top 7 Alternatives to Wikipedia] Open Education Database. (Includes Conservapedia along with six other online encyclopedias, criticizes Wikipedia for inaccuracies and hypocrisy.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/01/2013-is-starting-off-to-be-bad-year-for.html Study shows that the world's biggest pro-evolution website is driving away newcomer editors! Also, video shows evolutionists at Wikipedia are clowns!]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wikipediocracy.com Wikipediocracy]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia_controversies Wikipedia's List of Wikipedia controversies]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/story/2704 Wikipedia: What Is It Good For?], By Dick Clark, 9/19/2007. Retrieved from The Ludwig von Mises Institute, http://www.mises.org/ November 5, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MoVLl_ne2Y Wikipedias' Own Cofounder Lambastes the Site for Bias]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Encyclopedias]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikimedia Foundation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;diff=1733525</id>
		<title>Wikipedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;diff=1733525"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T23:51:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Wpp.png|thumb|right|200px|The multilingual Wikipedia home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Wikipedia''' is an [[internet|online]] [[wiki]]-based [[encyclopedia]] hosted and owned by the non-profit organization [[Wikimedia Foundation]] and financially supported by grants from left-leaning foundations plus an aggressive annual online fundraising drive.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20180527010133/http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_releases/Wikimedia_Foundation_announces_tenth_annual_fundraising_campaign&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Most of Wikipedia's articles can be edited publicly by both registered and anonymous editors,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://books.google.com/books?id=wMhBQ0WdjF4C&amp;amp;pg=PA199#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; mostly consisting of teenagers and the unemployed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;theregister.co.uk&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/18/sanger_forks_wikipedia/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As such, it tends to project a [[liberal]]—and, in some cases, even [[socialist]], [[Communist]], and [[Nazi]]-sympathising—worldview, which is totally at odds with [[conservative]] [[reality]] and rationality.[[Citation needed]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia was co-founded by [[Jimbo Wales]] (an [[Atheism|atheist]], [[libertarian]], and [[objectivist]]), and philosophy professor [[Larry Sanger]] in 2001.  The website was originally created to complement the now-defunct peer-reviewed online encyclopedia [[Nupedia]] as a way for collaboration on articles. However, Wikipedia overtook Nupedia and became an independent project hosted by the [[Wikimedia Foundation]], which also hosts various related websites, known as &amp;quot;sister projects&amp;quot;, such as ''Wikinews'' and ''Wikibooks''.  Co-founder Larry Sanger later acknowledged that Wikipedia does not follow its own neutrality policy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SangerNeutrality&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/larry-sanger-co-founder-of-wikipedia-agrees-that-it-does-not-follow-its-own-neutrality-policy/ Uncommon Descent, December 1, 2016, Posted by Barry Arrington]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of Wikipedia state that Wikipedia's articles contain [[Examples of bias in Wikipedia|systemic bias]],&amp;lt;ref name=howtheleft&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-swindle/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that the information included within its articles are a mixture of truths, [[half-truth]]s, and falsehoods.&amp;lt;ref name=hnn&amp;gt;http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/125437&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The nature of Wikipedia also makes it subject to spin and [[bias]], examples of which include paid public relations advocacy and inserting libelous content into the biographies of politicians for a political purpose.&amp;lt;ref name=hnn/&amp;gt; Wikipedia was also criticized for having a [[liberal bias]] in its articles about politics, despite Wikipedia's &amp;quot;neutral point of view&amp;quot; policy.&amp;lt;ref name=howtheleft/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their biased admins causes people to get blocked for little to no reason.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Continuing loss of influence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's traffic level stems from its high placement in Google searches, and that many people rely upon it for quick research regarding trivial facts.  However, users are turning to alternatives such as the voice-based iPhone application [[Siri]] or the Knowledge Graph display on Google search result pages of key facts about search targets.&amp;lt;ref name=timesindia&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/internet/Google-eating-into-Wikipedia-page-views/articleshow/29072825.cms?referral=PM|title=Google eating into Wikipedia page views?|work=Times of India|first=Subodh |last=Varma|date=January 20, 2014|accessdate=March 20, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia page-views dropped by 2 billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Wikipedia's most popular versions are leading the decline: page-views of the English Wikipedia dropped by 12 percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost 9 percent.&amp;lt;ref name=timesindia/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to the number of visitors declining, there continues to be a drop in active editors as well.  In August 2012, it was reported that Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/pro-evolution-wikipedia-has-shrinking.html Pro-evolution Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors plus [[Quora]] is Wikipedia's worst nightmare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the same time, ''Business Insider'' indicated [[Quora]] was &amp;quot;Wikipedia's worst nightmare&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/pro-evolution-wikipedia-has-shrinking.html Pro-evolution Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors plus Quora is Wikipedia's worst nightmare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unreliability of Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia relies on self-selected &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; to write and compile articles, with no preference given for scholars in the fields about which they are writing. This fact may disqualify Wikipedia from being considered a genuine encyclopedia, ironically even by its own standards. An encyclopedia is supposed to be a collection of articles by &amp;quot;well-educated, well-informed content experts.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Theoretically, Wikipedia is supposed to compensate for this weakness by requiring references to reputable secondary sources. But editors can delete, without collaboration, any text or entry they dislike, citing one of the many Wikipedia guidelines for doing so. Entries posted by scholars in the field, based on peer-reviewed, academic articles are deleted by editors with an ideological bias. Wikipedia, then, only represents the majority view of its editors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the contribution of volunteer editors has declined, some of the void has been replaced by paid public relations professionals.  These paid editors seek to present their client companies or individuals in the best possible light.  This has resulted in many articles being transformed into paid advertising pieces that take advantage of the English Wikipedia's high placement on Google search results.  This chronic problem has become so severe that the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed amending its terms of service to require disclosures of paid editing conflicts of interest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use/Paid_contributions_amendment|title=Terms of use/Paid contributions amendment|date=February 21, 2014|accessdate=March 20, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the competition to control content, the paid PR editors win out because they are monitoring pages as a full-time job, while editors seeking to keep content more balanced are only part-time volunteers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the ''American Journalism Review'' declared concerning Wikipedia:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;An even more blunt assessment appears in the encyclopedia's &amp;quot;Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia&amp;quot; posting: &amp;quot;We do not expect you to trust us. It is in the nature of an ever-changing work like Wikipedia that, while some articles are of the highest quality of scholarship, others are admittedly complete rubbish.&amp;quot; It also reminds users not to use Wikipedia as a primary source or for making &amp;quot;critical decisions.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Despite its official &amp;quot;neutrality policy,&amp;quot; [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia|Wikipedia has a strong liberal bias.]] In an article entitled &amp;quot;Wikipedia Lies, Slander Continue,&amp;quot; [[journalism|journalist]] [[Joseph Farah]] stated Wikipedia &amp;quot;is not only a provider of inaccuracy and bias. It is a wholesale purveyor of lies and slander unlike any other the world has ever known.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wnd.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=83640&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Mr. Farah has repeatedly been the victim of defamation on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wnd.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  In December 2010, [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[JP Holding]] called Wikipedia &amp;quot;the abomination that causes misinformation&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://tektonticker.blogspot.com/search/label/Wikipedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some say that Wikipedia's unreliability is systemic, citing Douglas Adams: &amp;quot;''In other words—and this is the rock-solid principle on which the whole of the Corporation’s Galaxywide success is founded—their fundamental design flaws are completely hidden by their superficial design flaws.'' Wikipedia, which is written by anyone, still struggles to solve the need for traditional quality controls characteristic of conventional [[encyclopedia]]s. The self-policing practices have produced results and accuracy some claim is far better than originally expected but still widely questioned. Research released in April 2012 claimed 60% of Wikipedia articles contain &amp;quot;inaccuracies&amp;quot;, leading the ''[[Daily Mail]]'' to dub it &amp;quot;Iffy-Pedia&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2131458/Up-articles-Wikipedia-contain-factual-errors.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The lack of consistency and uniform supervision leaves an ever-present shadow over any given piece of information. Many in the [[College|academy]] insist that it is an unreliable source for [[research]] and an unacceptable reference in many classrooms. However, Wikipedia steers people to original [[Source|source material]], and with the use of hyperlinks and [[search engine]]s, it has become the most widely used intermediary reference tool on the [[Internet]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the style manual for the [[Associated Press]], the largest news agency in the United States, Wikipedia should not be used as a primary source, but the hyperlinks in articles may be helpful as sources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia has millions of entries on trivia and mundane topics ranging from an explanation for &amp;quot;duh&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duh (only after Conservapedia criticized the entry on the English word &amp;quot;duh&amp;quot; did Wikipedia eventually remove it)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to singles by obscure rock bands&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honk_If_You_Love_Fred_Durst Honk If You Love Fred Durst]'' (accessed April 1, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to arcane British nobility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Part of the article about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Liddell Henry Liddell], a 19th-century Vice-chancellor of Oxford University and author, includes that his grandfather was the youngest son of the 8th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, and that his daughter was the child ''Alice in Wonderland'' was written for (accessed April 1, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There are editions of Wikipedia in 250 languages, and 130 have more than 1000 articles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias List of Wikipedias - Wikimedia], accessed April 1, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After about four years Wikipedia had about 450,000 entries,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aaron Weiss, The Unassociated Press, N.Y. Times, Feb. 10, 2005, at G5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and after six years it had about 1.7 million entries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics English Wikipedia statistics] accessed April 1, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Four years later this number had more than doubled again: in November 2011, there were more than 3.8 million content pages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics English Wikipedia statistics] accessed May 6, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As of February 2014, there are more than 4.4 million &amp;quot;content&amp;quot; pages, many of which lack educational value. On important topics, the information is often misleading due to the unchecked, [[Wikipedia#Leftist bias|systematic liberal bias]] that dominates Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of Wikipedia articles can vary greatly.  Some articles, particularly about narrow topics and those of little interest, are well written and appear to have input from one or more subject matter experts.  Articles about broader topics and with high viewership naturally have more editors, many of whom are not well versed in the subject matter.  In determining the quality of an article it is helpful to check the sources or references to see if one or more of the standard references for the topic is frequently cited.  Often the most valuable feature of an article will be to direct the reader to good quality references, if they exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Origins==&lt;br /&gt;
Initially, Wikipedia was hosted on servers operated by Bomis, Inc., a company that also sold pornographic pictures.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Martin Hickman and Genevieve Roberts, &amp;quot;WIKIPEDIA,&amp;quot; The Independent (London) p. 12 (Feb 13, 2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The majority owner of Bomis had lost his fortune in a lawsuit, and the Wikipedia volunteers feared that if all of Bomis' assets were seized, ownership of Wikipedia would be transferred.  In 2003, Jimbo Wales addressed this risk by founding the Wikimedia Foundation to take control of Wikipedia's assets. The Wikimedia Foundation is a non-profit organization that provides support for Wikipedia and other similar projects,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home Wikimedia Foundation] accessed April 7, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and also the free MediaWiki software that runs Wikipedia and Conservapedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki home] accessed April 7, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It also gives out millions of dollars in grants each year to liberal causes that recruit liberals to edit Wikipedia so as to reflect their biases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leftist bias ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Leftist roots of Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia shows a systematic bias in the proportion of articles which treat controversial issues.  It ignores its own [[NPOV]] policy when it allows contributors to &amp;quot;delete well-referenced information&amp;quot; merely because it comes from a [[scientist]] who holds a minority view. It would only be a violation, if the article used the information to give a false impression of the proportion of scientists adhering to that view, but liberals use &amp;quot;undue weight&amp;quot; like a sledge hammer. They are either unaware or unconcerned about their bias.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not surprising, given this [[Zogby]] poll:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While 97% of [[Republican]]s surveyed said the media are [[liberal]], two-thirds of [[political independent]]s feel the same, but fewer than one in four independents (23%) said they saw a &amp;quot;conservative bias&amp;quot;. [[Democrat]]s, while much more likely to perceive a conservative bias than other groups, were not nearly as sure the [[media]] was against them as were the Republicans. While Republicans were unified in their perception of a [[left-wing]] media, just two-thirds of Democrats were certain the media skewed [[right-wing|right]] – and 17% said the bias favored the left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1262&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
David Swindle writes at [[FrontPage Magazine]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There was not a single ideological vision driving Wikipedia’s founders and core contributors as they launched the project. Jimmy Wales, who would become the face of the project and its “benevolent dictator,” according to Andrew Lih’s ''The Wikipedia Revolution​'', is a libertarian and [[Ayn Rand|Ayn Rand​ian]] [[Objectivism|Objectivist]]. Also important in shaping Wikipedia was the so-called “hacker ethos,” the culture that has developed amongst computer programmers over the last 40 years and been shaped by the Left, the counterculture, popular culture, and [[anarchism|anarchist]] thought.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What binds together these ideologies is a [[utopia]]n ideal that human beings are more prone to [[altruism]] rather than self-interest. In Wikipedia Revolution Wales is quoted as saying, “Generally we find most people out there on the internet are good… It’s one of the wonderful humanitarian discoveries in Wikipedia, that most people only want to help us and build this free nonprofit, charitable resource.” Ward Cunningham was the programmer who created the wiki concept and software. According to Lih, he believed in the Wiki because “People are generally good.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lih explains how this philosophy is embedded within Wikipedia’s rules:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A core idea Wikipedia embraced.. was to assume good faith when interacting with others. The guideline promoted optimistic production rather than pessimistic nay-saying, and reads, “Unless there is strong evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it; avoid accusing others of harmful motives without particularly strong evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as it worked out, Wikipedia in practice has strayed from these utopian ideas because of the ease with which political and social bias trumps altruism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After almost a decade of rapid growth and free-wheeling experimentation the situation at the site by the Summer of 2009 was chaos. Political operatives would sabotage one another in electoral contests by vandalizing pages. More malicious misinformation filtered in freely, with living historical figures accused of involvement in conspiratorial plots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/23/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia co-founder [[Larry Sanger]], who left the site, later acknowledged that Wikipedia does not follow its own neutrality policy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SangerNeutrality&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Peter-Singer.jpg|right|thumbnail|250px|The atheist philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of [[bestiality]] (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the [[liberal]] and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  See: [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Wikipedia on bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia also has an automatic Wikimedia Commons editing software called &amp;quot;Commonist,&amp;quot; which allows the user to upload multiple files at once.  The symbol of [[communism]] - the &amp;quot;hammer and sickle&amp;quot; of the leftist ideology which murdered millions in the former [[Soviet Union]] - is featured prominently on the instruction page as well as the tags that mark each uploaded image.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Commonist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 23, 2011, David Swindle published an article at ''[[FrontPage Magazine]]'' detailing how Wikipedia has been taken over by the [[Leftist|political left]] and he cited statistics relating to Wikipedia's articles on [[Anne Coulter]], [[Michael Moore]], [[Glenn Beck]] and [[Keith Olbermann]] which helped demonstrate the Wikipedia has a leftist/liberal bias plus he discussed the liberal/leftist cultural foundations of Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/23/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/ How the left conquered Wikipedia - Part 1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, Swindle wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Consider Ann Coulter versus Michael Moore​. Coulter’s entry (on August 9, 2011) was 9028 words long.* Of this longer-than-usual entry, 3220 words were devoted to “Controversies and criticism” in which a series of incidents involving Coulter and quotes from her are cited with accompanying condemnations, primarily from her opponents on the Left. That’s 35.6 percent of Coulter’s entry devoted to making her look bad. By contrast, Moore’s entry is 2876 words (the more standard length for entries on political commentators), with 130 devoted to “Controversy.” That’s 4.5% of the word count, a fraction of Coulter’s. Does this mean that an “unbiased” commentator would find Coulter eight times as “controversial” as Moore?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Talk Pages ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of Wikipedia's leftist bias is clearly evident from their talk pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, when an article about the Barcelona May Days&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:May_Days&amp;amp;oldid=903699178&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an event during the Spanish Civil War where hundreds of anti-Stalinist Trotskyists and anarchists were gunned down by the pro-Stalin Republican government) portrayed the anti-Stalinist side, which contained author George Orwell, in a generally favourable light, Stalinists filled the talk page with childish attacks on the authors of the article, including expletives, as is characteristic of Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Purported &amp;quot;Tertiary&amp;quot; Source and Arbitrary Standards==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia purports to be a &amp;quot;tertiary&amp;quot; source, relying on edited work from reputable sources. The policy is meant to build on the work of qualified editors of secondary sources. Some accuse Wikipedia, therefore, of relying on [[hearsay]], and discouraging the application of [[logic]] and new development of new insights. The result is an agglomeration of reheated &amp;quot;consensus&amp;quot; with little or no intellectual merit of its own; in particular, it is impossible to challenge orthodoxy, received wisdom or commonly held misconceptions through the Wikipedia system, no matter how factually incorrect those orthodoxies might be. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supporters of Wikipedia would claim that relying on secondary sources encourages reliability and objectivity. However, there are cases of Wikipedia applying it's standards arbitrarily. For example, the case of Wikipedia editor &amp;quot;Yeoberry&amp;quot; (user ID 3606936), an editor with a Ph.D. in church history who first posted materials about &amp;quot;Icons&amp;quot; on August 6, 2012, with multiple citations to historical documents. The material was removed and Yeoberry was told that Wikipedia is a &amp;quot;tertiary&amp;quot; source and so he needed to find reliable secondary sources. On April 4, 2013, Yeoberry again added largely the same material, this time citing a newly published academic paper in a peer-reviewed journal. The information was again removed, with editors, at least some of whom religiously affiliated with the organization supporting icons, claiming the editor had a &amp;quot;COI&amp;quot; (conflict of interest). Neither time did the editors removing Yeoberry's material consult Yeoberry. But when Yeoberry reverted to his edition, he was charged with &amp;quot;edit warring.&amp;quot; When Yeoberry challenged the arbitrary use of Wikipedia criteria he was blocked from editing indefinitely and then his access to his own talk page was also blocked.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;amp;oldid=548948980#Proposal:_Indefinite_Block&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia articles, especially on controversial or political and religious topics, are often guarded by editors who have an interest in slanting the content of the article, may have no formal education on the topic, and can find a so-called reason for suppressing the information they want to suppress. Editors can claim the source is unreliable (as they interpret that); that information gives &amp;quot;UNDUE&amp;quot; weight to the topic the information is about; peer-reviewed, academic articles written by scholars can be removed by editors if, in the opinion of an editor, the view expressed is &amp;quot;Fringe&amp;quot; or if the contributor has a &amp;quot;COI&amp;quot; (conflict of interest) if he's the author of the secondary source or has an advanced education or other interest in the topic; etc. Editors with advanced education in a topic, citing sources from peer-reviewed journals, can have their contributions deleted and their participation prohibited if a few other editors, without such qualification but with enough knowledge of the Wikipedia jargon, decide to suppress him or her. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally, encyclopedias were written by scholars, either by one or a few whose knowledge is considered &amp;quot;encyclopedic&amp;quot; (i.e. very broad) or each article is written by an expert in the field. But in Wikipedia, expertise in a given field can disqualify one from contributing in that field resulting in Wikipedia being accused of being a &amp;quot;[[idiocracy]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Wikipedia is non-profit, the [[Wikia]] project of its co-founder is very much for-profit and has raised millions of dollars in [[venture capital]]. Already Wikipedia has been criticized for favoring Wikia. When Wikipedia community voted 61-39% percent to treat all links to other sites equally by removing nofollow (Google-ignored) tags for all of them, the Wikipedia co-founder overruled this decision and Wikipedia now favors Wikia in its treatment of nofollow tags.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/28/wikipedia-special-treatment-for-wikia-and-other-wikis/|title=Wikipedia: Special Treatment for Wikia and some other Wikis|author=Nik Cubrilovic|date=April 28, 2007|accessdate=July 22, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-January/061137.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The Register'' said:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;theregister.co.uk&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Wikipedia has tried to balance the Utopian goal of &amp;quot;an encyclopedia anyone can edit&amp;quot; with the more utilitarian goal of &amp;quot;a website anyone would want to read&amp;quot;. With over a million articles, and a rulebook almost as dense, Wikipedia has demonstrated an insatiable desire to participate, create lists and generate procedures. The result is a huge silo of recorded trivia, and perhaps the world's largest, most distributed bureaucracy - mostly manned by a casual staff of teenagers and the unemployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the past few years, Wikipedia has added banners begging for money from its viewers. The site claims to be in need of more funding, but in fact it is &amp;quot;awash with cash - and raises far more money each year than it needs to keep operating.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/20/cash_rich_wikipedia_chugging/ Wikipedia doesn't need your money - so why does it keep pestering you?], 20 December 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia, a registered trademark of Wikimedia Foundation, is used also by services like WikiExperts.us, which is declared as not being affiliated with it.&lt;br /&gt;
WikiExperts.us accepts money to write Wikipedia entries for businesses and is included in American business ventures of Alex Konanykhin, the Former Russian oligarch, who has been wanted in Russia since Yeltsin's days to face charges relating to embezzlement and financial fraud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title='Not terrorists': Hysteria over MH17 fails to take account of both law and facts |author=Roslyn Fuller |date=July 25, 2014 |accessdate=July 26, 2014 |url=http://rt.com/op-edge/175496-hysteria-mh17-ukraine-facts-terrorists/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scandals and decline==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wikipedia scandals.jpg|thumb|450px|right|Decline in Wikimedia Foundation donations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://centiare.com/Wikipedia_scandals Wikipedia scandals]. Retrieved from centiare.com October 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Graph courtesy [http://www.centiare.com/Directory:Gregory_J._Kohs Gregory Kohs].  Used with Permission.]]The cumulative effect of multiple scandals and revelations has led to declining activity on the English Wikipedia. The rate of new account creation peaked in early 2007 and has declined ~30% since.  Overall editing activity showed a steady decline beginning in February 2007. An independent analysis reported, &amp;quot;The rate at which edits were being made to Wikipedia articles appears to have peaked in February to April 2007 and declined since. This decline is unprecedented in Wikipedia's history.... Though it may be purely coincidental, this time frame also corresponds to the Essjay controversy appearing in the press.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2007-October/033661.html Statistical Decline of the English Wikipedia], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dragons_flight/Log_analysis Dragons flight/Log analysis], October 9, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even after the hoax was revealed of high level intimates promoted by the Wikimedia Foundation as experts in fields that they were not, to persuade college professors to allow students to cite Wikipedia as a reliable source, and entrusted with the ability to invade users privacy which could affect, in their words, &amp;quot;life and death,&amp;quot; Wikipedia still appealed to students with a Jim and Tammy Faye Baker-style fundraising slogan across one million project space pages that read, &amp;quot;OMG! Wikipedia is gone! I’ll flunk my exams!&amp;quot; [http://whygive.wikimedia.org/2007/11/24/omg-wikipedia-is-gone-ill-flunk-my-exams/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further evidence of the decline in Wikipedia is that the number of editors who voted in the 2012 Arbitration Committee elections has dropped to 858.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2012#Turnout|title=Arbitration Commitee Elections December 2012|accessdate=December 18, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For a website that claims to have thousands of active editors, this is very low.  Active editors are discouraged from voting because all voters are subject to automatic investigation and invasion of their privacy to determine if they are &amp;quot;sockpuppets&amp;quot; of other voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://archive.is/6tiF8|title=Wikipedia's &amp;quot;scrutineers&amp;quot; snoop on living arrangements of contributors|work=Examiner|first=Greg|last=Kohs|date=December 11, 2013|accessdate=December 15, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shane Fitzgerald Hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the death of composer Maurice Jarre, a Wikipedia editor named Shane Fitzgerald attached a quote to Jarre's page: &amp;quot;One could say my life itself has been one long soundtrack. Music was my life, music brought me to life, and music is how I will be remembered long after I leave this life. When I die there will be a final waltz playing in my head, that only I can hear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hoaxes.org/archive/permalink/the_maurice_jarre_wikipedia_hoax/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The words are poetic, yet were never spoken by Jarre, and meant to appeal to news journalists seeking information.  It was cited in many newspapers as a genuine quote before its removal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/id/30699302/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/student-hoaxes-worlds-media-wikipedia/#.WLNTW5ArLrc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Had Fitzgerald not confessed to the lie and informed major newspapers, it is likely that the quote would have been cited to one of them.  In the days following, only one newspaper (''[[The Guardian]]'') publicly apologized for the use of a source that can be a tool for duping the public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/may/04/journalism-obituaries-shane-fitzgerald&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other newspapers, such as the [[Washington Post]], simply deleted their articles from online archives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==False claim about Brent Bozell==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2007, [[Brent Bozell]] described this falsehood in Wikipedia:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.mrc.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2007/col20070320.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The other day, [[Bernie Goldberg]] emailed me, upset. He pointed me to his Wikipedia entry. To read what was written was to conclude that apparently I must hate his guts. But we are friends. He is a man for whom I have profound respect, professional and personal. He knew there was foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right there on the screen, under the heading &amp;quot;Criticism,&amp;quot; it stated that I had attacked him, &amp;quot;claiming that Goldberg merely lifted material he had been producing for years, and only published the book because he had an ax to grind with his former employers and was attempting to make a 'quick buck,' noting that Goldberg never mentioned the alleged liberal bias of the media until it was 'convenient' and 'profitable' for him to do so.&amp;quot;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In fact, those words have never been uttered by me. The accusation would be false. Back in 1996, Goldberg used the op-ed pages of ''The Wall Street Journal'' publicly to castigate his own network for its one-sided oafish bashing of [[Steve Forbes]].  It was anything but &amp;quot;convenient&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;profitable&amp;quot; for him. It ruined his friendship with [[Dan Rather]] and put him on a path to the outer fringes of CBS News. Ultimately, it ruined his newscaster career.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My attorney contacted Wikipedia by email demanding the removal of this false entry. No response. So we edited out the offensive material ourselves, after which in writing counsel alerted Wikipedia to the legal action that might befall them should this be repeated. Here's full disclosure, Wikipedia-style: You can see how each article is altered, sometimes hour by hour, in its &amp;quot;History&amp;quot; section. But there is no mention of the attorney's complaints. In the Goldberg article's history, an editor simply now scolds: &amp;quot;Bozell's article is a mock-jealous swipe at Goldberg's opportunism. PLEASE REREAD IT.&amp;quot; (Capitals theirs.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Goldberg and I are not alone. The website Conservapedia.com has a [[Bias in Wikipedia|long list]] of 41 allegations of bias and factual errors at Wikipedia. You can add to that the problem with the credentials of its staff. One of its editors, named only &amp;quot;Essjay&amp;quot; online and described on his user profile &amp;quot;as a tenured professor of religion at a private university with expertise in canon law,&amp;quot; was recently exposed as a 24-year-old college kid in Kentucky. He resigned in disgrace — even though Wikipedia tried to retain him, claiming he'd edited thousands of articles with flair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of apologizing to Brent Bozell, '''Wikipedia instead says &amp;quot;Bozell points to Conservapedia as a resource that documents Wikipedia's faults in this regard, presumably holding it as a more authoritative reference less vulnerable to vandalism.&amp;quot;'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brent_Bozell accessed April 1, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rewriting its own history==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Associated Press and others credit Larry Sanger as the co-founder of Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/tech/2007/mar/25/032502465.html&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But the Associated Press quotes Jimmy Wales as denying it:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;When you write this up please do not uncritically repeat Sanger's absurd claim to be the co-founder of Wikipedia.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I know of no one who was there at the company at the beginning who would think it anything other than laughable,&amp;quot; he added. This is an interesting comment, considering that Larry Sanger takes credit for coining the name, &amp;quot;Wikipedia.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_20#Sorry.2C_Jimbo.2C_but_not_buying_it. User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 20, Larry Sanger 03:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I am not bent out of shape about it,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;quot;The facts are on my side, which is why I bother so little about it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Associated Press, Jimmy Wales &amp;quot;has repeatedly tried to address this - even going so far as editing his own Wikipedia biography to tone down credit for Sanger. Such autobiographical contributions are frowned upon in Wikipedia's community, and Wales apologized after his changes were noticed and publicized by blogger Rogers Cadenhead in 2005.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wales' booking agent for speaking engagements claims that Wales is &amp;quot;the founder&amp;quot; of Wikipedia, which results in surprised clients when that claim is challenged. The false &amp;quot;founder&amp;quot; claim is on Wales' webpage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://jimmywales.com/about-jimmy/|title=About Jimmy|accessdate=February 6, 2015}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jimmy Wales has admitted that certain administrators, contrary to their own rules, have at times completely removed editing evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Seigenthaler scandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In early October 2005, a prominent and respected journalist [[John Seigenthaler Sr.]], contacted Wikipedia founder [[Jimmy Wales]] about false and libelous content in his biographical entry.  Essjay, a 24-year-old Wikipedia Administrator who was advancing rapidly in the organization, was dispatched to handle the situation.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;User:Essjay/Letter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=User:Essjay/Letter User:Essjay/Letter].  Retrieved from WikiTruth, November 3, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An anonymous contributor added to Seigenthaler's biography the previous May,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;John Seigenthaler Sr. was the assistant to Attorney General [[Robert Kennedy]] in the early 1960s. For a short time, he was thought to have been directly involved in the Kennedy assassinations of both [[John F. Kennedy|John]], and his brother, Bobby. Nothing was ever proven,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;John Seigenthaler moved to the [[Soviet Union]] in 1971, and returned to the [[United States]] in 1984. He started one of the country's largest public relations firms shortly thereafter.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales told Seigenthaler that Wikipedia is &amp;quot;accountable&amp;quot; and corrects mistakes immediately, but that the internet service provider of the anonymous user probably would not be helpful in identifying who placed the content.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Seigenthaler's Op-Eds&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.journalism.org/node/1673 Seigenthaler's Op-Eds], October 1, 2005.  Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org November 12, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Accountability activist [[Daniel Brandt]], a victim of a spurious biographical entry by Wikipedia Administrators, identified the place of employment of the anonymous user, and from there the person accountable was identified.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journalism.cf.ac.uk/2006/online/index.php?id=parse-195-0-0-251&amp;amp;article=336&amp;amp;author=India+Camm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler returned to the editorial pages of ''USA Today'' from which he retired as its first editorial manager to write an Op-Ed piece critical of Wikipedia and the threat it poses to free speech due of its overt provocation of government regulation, its irresponsible self-regulation and lack of accountability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm A false Wikipedia 'biography'], By John Seigenthaler, ''USA Today'', 11/29/2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== CNN interview ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 5, 2005 Wales and Seigenthaler appeared on [[CNN]]. An exchange between CNN moderator [[Kyra Phillips]] and Wales went like this:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|PHILLIPS:...I ran my name. I was shocked to see what was under my name. ...I'm telling you right now, Jimmy, that's not how I want people to see me and understand me. And what I'm about, and what I write about in my interviews, ''et cetera''. So, you know, it's not just individuals like John, but me and many other people, that just have concerns that this is creating gossip that can be very harmful. And people go to these sites thinking that this is the truth.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|WALES: Well, I mean, I think the real key is that the site matures over time, the -- all of the articles are edited over and over and over, and improved. Anyone's free to contribute. You're free to go and contribute.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This in fact is not the case.  Phillips was not free to remove objectionable content within her biographical entry, as Daniel Brandt at that exact moment was discovering.  Not four days prior, Wales told ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' magazine regarding Brandt's objections to a false Wikipedia biography created by Wikipedia Administrators about him, &amp;quot;I find it hard to take him very seriously at all,&amp;quot; and libelous slanders remained in Brandt's biography for a year and half. Wales told CNN, &amp;quot;we are very, very responsive to complaints and concerns.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler told the audience &amp;quot;with accountability comes credibility&amp;quot; and expressed fear that, &amp;quot;I'm afraid we're going to get regulated media as a result.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0512/05/lol.02.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 9, Seigenthaler appeared on C-SPAN's ''Washington Journal'' with Brian Lamb and articulated his concern that members of Congress or other powerful figures in government may likewise be targeted.  On November 2, 2006, days before the mid-term Congressional elections, an anonymous IP address traced to the ''[[New York Times]]'' changed [[U.S. House of Representatives]] [[Majority Leader]] [[Tom DeLay]]'s Wikipedia biographical entry from &amp;quot;a prominent member of the [[Republican Party]]&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Grand Dragon of the Republican Party.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tom_DeLay&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=85320018 Wikipedia/Tom DeLay, Revision as of 20:19, 2 November 2006, IP 199.181.174.146]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/name2ip.php?orgname=New+York+Times&amp;amp;location= WikiScanner]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler wrote a more expansive column in the ''The Tennessean'' after the November 30 ''USA Today'' piece appeared, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|a sudden stream of invective — homophobic, anti-Semitic and racist — spilled, as if from a sewer, onto the Wikipedia page under my name. ..It identified me as ...a &amp;quot;Nazi,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;fascist-oriented&amp;quot; ....murderer ...there also was the profile picture of Adolf Hitler over the caption, &amp;quot;Press photo of Seigenthaler.&amp;quot; The accompanying line: &amp;quot;He is secretly responsible for killing all the Jews.&amp;quot; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accountability and Section 230 ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wikifascists.JPG|thumb|275px|right|From Wikipedia Watch. [http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/] The inscription reads,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ''&amp;quot;Two wikifascists find someone without a biography.&amp;quot;'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Upon his retirement from ''USA Today'', Seigenthaler founded the First Amendment Center, an organization dedicated to a national dialogue about [[First Amendment]] rights and values. Seigenthaler criticized passage of [[Section 230]] of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Section 230 states that &amp;quot;no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker.&amp;quot; Unlike print and broadcast companies, internet service providers (ISP's) cannot be sued for disseminating defamatory attacks on citizens posted by others. Seigenthaler noted [[Jimbo Wales]] told [[Brian Lamb]] in a  [[C-SPAN]] interview that Wikipedia is accountable and that mistakes are corrected within minutes, but the false information remained in Seigenthaler's biography for five months. Seigenthaler concluded, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|And so we live in a universe of new media with phenomenal opportunities for worldwide communications and research — but populated by volunteer vandals with poison-pen intellects.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A false Wikipedia 'biography', By John Seigenthaler, ''USA Today'', 11/29/2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of ''Zeran v. AOL'', Zeran sued AOL for refusing to screen and remove defamatory messages, even after Zeran notified the ISP of their existence. The lower court ruled for the service provider and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the decision, noting that the intent of Section 230 was to (1) remove incentives on service providers to restrict speech on the Internet and (2) encourage self-regulation by service providers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=916529&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adl.org/Civil_Rights/newcyber.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An American citizen who posts material on the Internet that is illegal in a foreign country could be prosecuted if he subjected himself to the jurisdiction of that country. Internet users who export material that is illegal, that is to say, post material that is accessible and illegal in some foreign countries may be subject to prosecution in that country. However, under American law, the United States will not extradite a person for engaging in a constitutionally protected activity even if that activity violates a criminal law elsewhere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rjayco.com/obrien/nazism.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Essjay given oversight ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See Main article: [[Wikipedia:The Essjay scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Essjay wrote a professor to persuade her to allow her students to use Wikipedia as a viable source of information and posted a verbatim copy of the email for others to use.  Essjay stated, &amp;quot;I was the administrator who deleted the inappropriate revisions when Mr. Seigenthaler contacted our founder, [[Jimmy Wales]]; it is quite unfortunate that a relatively minor issue on a relatively minor figure has provided so much negative publicity.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;User:Essjay/Letter&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Seigenthaler noted in his Op-Ed piece, &amp;quot;The motive for the salacious stuff directed at me is reasonably obvious,&amp;quot; and quoted some comments, &amp;quot;We all at Wikipedia think he (Seigenthaler) is a horrible, stupid p...k for complaining about small inaccuracies in his biography.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Seigenthaler's Op-Eds&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others said, &amp;quot;Mr. Seigenthaler's attitude and actions are reprehensible and ill-formed,&amp;quot; and “if there is an error whether large or small, he can correct it.”  This again, was not true.  Even prior to the Wikipedia policy, '''Biographies of Living Persons''', [[conflict of interest]] restrictions existed on the subject of an article editing their own entry. Another wrote: &amp;quot;Rather than fixing the article himself, he made a legal threat.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/02/12/bias_sabotage_haunt_wikipedias_free_world/?page=3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Seigraph.gif|400px|thumb|right|The Seigenthaler scandal was viewed as &amp;quot;the best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia&amp;quot; as curiosity seekers to view the [[misinformation]] skyrocketed Alexa rankings.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the damage to an innocent person and divulgence of Wikipedia's precarious claim as a viable source, the Seigenthaler scandal was viewed as a triumph and considered &amp;quot;the best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Seigenthaler,_Sr.#The_best_thing_that_ever_happened_to_Wikipedia Talk:John Seigenthaler Sr.#The best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia], retrieved 23 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; catapulting it into a top ten most visited website as curiosity seekers responded to the negative publicity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikipediareview.com/lofiversion/index.php?t1100.html Wikipedia: A Nightmare Of Libel and Slander], Joel Leyden, Israel News Agency, 8 May 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scandal was originally billed as a &amp;quot;hoax&amp;quot;, then &amp;quot;controversy,&amp;quot; then downgraded to &amp;quot;incident,&amp;quot; and now re-upgraded to &amp;quot;controversy,&amp;quot; evidently in response to criticism.  The Wikipedia entry on &amp;quot;Seigenthaler controversy&amp;quot; contains [[disinformation]], making the claim, &amp;quot;After the incident, Wikipedia took steps to prevent a recurrence, including barring unregistered users from creating new pages.&amp;quot;  No actions were ever taken to require disclosure of the real life identities of contributors.  Barring unregistered users from creating new pages had nothing to do with the Seigenthaler scandal—the page already existed when an anonymous IP added the false information.  Registration of accounts requires no accountability of the real life identity of the contributor.  Indeed, many experienced Wikipedia editors and Administrators have dozens of registered accounts, called &amp;quot;sockpuppet accounts.&amp;quot;  Protecting the identities of anonymous high-level Administrators has always been more of a priority to the WikiMedia Foundation than the propagation of false information about real life persons whose identities are known.  Wales was asked by ''BusinessWeek'' magazine, “Why do you feel it is important to allow contributors and site administrators to remain anonymous?” Wales responded, “there are definitely people working in Wikipedia who may have privacy reasons for not wanting their name on the site….there are lots of reasons for privacy online that aren’t nefarious.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2005/tc20051214_441708.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the Seigenthaler case, it was the odd circumstance that a victim of false information had a large enough platform to respond, coupled with the welcome fact that the victim fundamentally opposes government regulation of internet speech.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's &amp;quot;Seigenthaler controversy&amp;quot; also states, &amp;quot;The Foundation added a new level of &amp;quot;oversight&amp;quot; features to the MediaWiki software,[12] accessible as of 2006 to around 20 experienced editors nominated by Wales,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler_Sr._Wikipedia_biography_controversy#Wikimedia_Foundation_reaction Seigenthaler controversy#Wikimedia Foundation reaction].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; one of whom was Essjay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ban on anonymous page creation “reform” was abandoned less than two years later as Wikipedia's usage and ratings slumped in the wake of yet more scandals and questions about Wikipedia's culture, core content policies, and endemic lack of accountability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/084292.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brandt / Berlet feud==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See Main article: [[Wikipedia:The Daniel Brandt controversy]]&lt;br /&gt;
An ugly [[far-left]] sectarian dispute&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://spencer.lib.ku.edu/exhibits/wilcox/5.html Laird Wilcox], ''The Watchdogs: A Close Look at Anti-Racist &amp;quot;Watchdog&amp;quot; Groups'', Second Edition, Part 2, Editorial Research Service, 1999, p. 21. ISBN 0-993592-96-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; reared its head in 2005 with disastrous consequences for the site's credibility. The feud had been dormant for many years until the need to elevate a “controversial and notable expert” above the level of “partisan and extreme” defined by its own policies became apparent which would have precluded the so-called “expert” as &amp;quot;a source for anything other than himself,” as Wikipedia's ever fluid policies dictate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daniel Brandt, founder of Namebase,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.namebase.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Google Watch, and Wikipedia Watch, removed Chip Berlet from his Board of Advisors in 1991 when Berlet refused to sit on the same Board which included Fletcher Prouty.&amp;quot;  Prouty, a retired Air Force colonel whose intelligence career stretched back to accompanying President [[Franklin Roosevelt]] to the [[Teheran conference]], was allegorically portrayed as the mysterious “Man X”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/lfprouty.htm Leroy Fletcher Prouty, Jr., Colonel, United States Air Force], [[Arlington National Cemetery]] Website, Retrieved November 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by Donald Southerland in  [[Oliver Stone]]'s film, [[JFK]]. A Brandt biographical page was created using Berlet as the source for unsavory attacks on Brandt.  Brandt describes himself as an &amp;quot;accountability activist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/04/your_take_roundupbelievers_neg.html Believers, Negativists Debate Wikipedia’s Trustworthiness], by Mark Glaser, 20 April 2006. Retrieved from pbs.org October 29, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Daniel_Brandt Wikiquote/Daniel Brandt#Sourced]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and claims he originally began working with Wikipedia editors in good faith during October 2005 but any biographical information he revealed was spun against him to depict him in a negative light.  Brandt states,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I soon realized that it was also about Berlet, who was still bent on undermining me. Berlet was using Wikipedia as part of his political agenda, and he was successful in this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=5641&amp;amp;st=40&amp;amp;p=21441&amp;amp;mode=linear#entry21441&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Berlet's biography underwent an extensive revision with most of the substantive NPOV criticism cut out.  The revising editor commented, &amp;quot;I kept Daniel Brandt, not because I feel he's a credible source, but because there's so little published criticism of Berlet, that I felt I had to retain something.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=9161554 Chip Berlet/Talk, SlimVirgin 00:19, 7 January 2005].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is an extraordinary statement and raises the question why the same high-level Administrator and author of several of Wikipedia's core content and citation policies, including '''Wikipedia:Reliable Sources''' and '''Wikipedia:Biographies of Living Persons''' ('''BLP'''),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;en.wikipedia.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons&amp;amp;diff=31947681&amp;amp;oldid=31753956&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; would use a source she did not consider credible. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies of living persons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia:Biographies of Living Persons (WP:BLP) policy did not come into being because of the Seigenthaler scandal, but rather over the Brandt controversy, as the originating editor noted in an edit summary.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;en.wikipedia.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Brandt requested Wikipedia delete his biographical entry, and ceased working with editors he suspected of working to further the propagation of false information about him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' magazine bills itself as the nation's oldest trade journal serving the newspaper industry with roots dating back to 1884.  Wikipedia founder [[Jimmy Wales]] responded to questions from ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' in a prepared statement on December 1, 2005 about Daniel Brandt saying,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I don't regard him as a valid source about anything at all&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/article_brief/eandp/1/1001612839 Wikipedia Founder, Readers Respond to Seigenthaler Article], Jay DeFoore, ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'', December 01, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales comments added '''undue weight'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:UNDUE#Undue_weight&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ('''WP:UNDUE''') to criticism of Brandt when placed within his biographical entry. Brandt demanded accountability from the army of unidentified Wikipedia Administrators furthering Chip Berlet's agenda to destroy Brandt's credibility, and elevate Berlet's own as a Wikipedia &amp;quot;expert.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:294577483 90fd22f5cd m.jpg|thumb|300px|right|From '''WikiTruth''', the inscription reads,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;''The Big Bad Brandt is Gonna Getcha!'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Brandt became known as the scourge of the Wikipedia Admin community.  WikiTruth says in its ''Brandt the Boogeyman'' entry,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|he dates back to a time when people would look up facts in books and would verify information without just doing a copy and paste from an AP news article and thinking they were done. He compares writing styles, he calls government agencies, and he writes letters. And when he's done, he tends to know. Or at least, he knows where he stands in terms of information. He's rather tenacious about getting stuff right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia, of course, doesn't do this much at all: depending on the day, they'll laud a link to a website as being absolutely useless (it's on the WEB, of course) and then the next minute link to a different website to back a &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; up. Citing books and printed materials is often a no-go, because nobody can read the original citation, so it gets swept away as well. Really, you have no idea what's good and what's bad, and it's all one big happy soup-hug. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, guys like Daniel Brandt are horrible for Wikipedia: he researches. He finds laws that pertain to situations. He asks the tough questions that could upset the whole Wiki-cart.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia continues to publish inaccurate and defamatory articles about living persons, written by anonymous contributors, based on other unreliable sources, and refuses to withdraw or change them. The victims of its libels have no legal means of compelling Wikipedia to make any changes. It is not answerable to any court or libel laws and simply behaves as if it is above the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Wordbomb Saga==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Patrick byrne overstock small.jpg|thumb|right|Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne [http://www.overstock.com/Patrick-Byrne-and-naked-short-selling/7371/static.html]]]&lt;br /&gt;
One of Wikipedia's most bitter and drawn-out disputes, chronicled in ''The Register,''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; centers around the assertion by representatives of Overstock.com&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.overstock.com/community&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that a [[Mainstream media|mainstream financial journalist]] Gary Weiss had been editing Wikipedia to impose his point of view on a series of articles relevant to the company. Weiss was once a reporter with BusinessWeek, in 2007 became a columnist with Forbes, and had for over 10 years been posting under fake names to confuse, distort, hijack Usenet groups, stock message boards, and Wikipedia, to prevent the public from understanding criminal activity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deepcapture.com/gary-weiss-scaramouch-psychopath/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Weiss was notorious around the Internet for his public feud with Overstock&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://garyweiss.blogspot.com/2007/05/overstockcoms-ethical-dilemma.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and its CEO [[Patrick Byrne]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://allantyoung.com/2008/09/22/patrick-byrne-vindicated/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ridiculing their campaign against the controversial practice of [[Naked Short Selling]].   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006, Judd Bagley, an ally of Overstock's Patrick Byrne having interviewed the CEO for a personal project, began editing Wikipedia to counter what was perceived to be a skewed representation of Naked Short Selling and Overstock.com. He was swiftly dispatched by influential Wikipedia administrators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after, Bagley became Overstock's Director of Communications, and embarked on an aggressive campaign to publicize the dispute on various websites, aiming to expose the administrators he held responsible for protecting Weiss. Using the moniker “Wordbomb”, Bagley presented evidence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://antisocialmedia.net/final-word-on-weiss/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; suggesting that not only was Gary Weiss editing Wikipedia using the name “User:Mantanmoreland“,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mantanmoreland&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but that he was operating other accounts to manipulate consensus and protect his interests in the dispute.  Mantanmoreland violated Wikipedia policies against Conflict of Interest and No Self Promotion by creating an article about himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gary_Weiss&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=48341962&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Bagley proved Weiss had edited Wikipedia from one of two main IPs used by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dtcc.com/about/business/index.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the organization charged with settling about a quadrillion stock trades each year. The DTCC is also the organization Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne said acts an enabler of perpetrators of illegal naked short selling of many public companies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=10360&amp;amp;st=0&amp;amp;p=36485&amp;amp;mode=linear#entry36485&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia responded to Bagley's campaign in typical schoolyard fashion. The dispute was escalated by a small clique of powerful Wikipedians who seemed less interested in the truth of Bagley's assertions, and more concerned with attacking perceived threats to the status quo at Wikipedia. With the approval of [[Jimbo Wales]], administrators sided with “Mantanmoreland” / Gary Weiss, and anointed Bagley / Wordbomb an “Enemy Of The Wiki” who needed to be silenced — a “stalker” and a “harasser” for publicizing the details of the person who had been editing relevant articles on Wikipedia, and the people who had been stopping him from doing the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For nearly two years, Bagley's name was invoked to inspire paranoia in the Wikipedia Admin Community to keep questioning editors in line. It became a textbook case for analysis of the intense group-think Wikipedia has become notorious for.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Judd bagley overstock.jpg|thumb|left|175px|Judd Bagley was made a target at the highest levels of Wikipedia and became a victim of a global [[witchhunt]] by the Wikipedia Admin Community for daring to expose an unholy alliance of abuse and [[corruption]] on [[Wall Street]] and in the Wikipedia cabal. [http://antisocialmedia.net/] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Bagley was repeatedly disparaged&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=15897&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by a cabal of out-of-control administrators such as Guy Chapman, who denounced Bagley as “lunatic” and “evil” when it suited. UK Wikimedia representative David Gerard banned an entire area of Utah to prevent Bagley raising his issues and made personally disparaging remarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:David_Gerard/archive_5#User:204.15.84.2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia Arbitrator Fred Bauder claimed that Bagley's blog AntiSocialMedia.net showed “moral depravity”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision&amp;amp;diff=158954587&amp;amp;oldid=158809362&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for challenging the Wiki-elite. Administrator Phil Sandifer dismissed Bagley in highly personal and offensive language while boasting&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083509.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that he himself had become a “powerful and trusted administrator on the 9th biggest website in the world.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other editors who raised Overstock's quite legitimate complaints were banned as proxies of Judd Bagley. Paranoia had taken such a hold that editors with productive records from all over the US, and as far afield as Europe and Asia found themselves accused of being Bagley. When the editor Cla68&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Cla68&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; questioned the issue of Gary Weiss editing Wikipedia, he was swiftly blocked by administrator Durova on the orders of Jimbo Wales who wrote,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gary_Weiss&amp;amp;diff=165916446&amp;amp;oldid=165916313&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; “Durova and Guy have my full support here. No nonsense, zero tolerance, shoot on sight. No kidding, this has gone on long enough”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SirFozzie/Investigation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; undertaken by concerned administrators into the editing patterns of “Mantanmoreland” came to fruition. Despite the “Mantanmoreland” account ceasing edits on Overstock / Naked Short Selling articles in September 2007, the study revealed evidence beyond reasonable doubt that the same person had been operating several accounts to “control” articles. Thus affirming Bagley's claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More worryingly for good faith Wikipedians was the revelation&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikback.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&amp;amp;Number=2762#Post2757&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/01/wikipedia_and_naked_shorting/print.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Jimbo Wales, alongside leading administrators, had considered that this person was almost certainly Gary Weiss in a private discussion as long ago as September 2007 (the same month the “Mantanmoreland” account quit editing the relevant articles). Meaning that behind the scenes, they were admitting that Bagley was probably right all along, yet in public were vilifying or blocking anyone who publicly stated so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the [[financial meltdown of 2008]], the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] issued directives aimed at curbing abusive naked short selling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.philly.com/inquirer/business/20090728_SEC_short-selling_rule_is_permanent.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Patrick Byrne has been widely recognized as in the forefront of the movement aimed at curbing such abuses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/?q=node/425&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Michael Moore==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Moorecagan.JPG|right|thumb|200px|Moore with [[Leslie Cagan]] [[United For Peace and Justice]] [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=629] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The website MichaelMoore.com, dissatisfied with a Wikipedia editor's edits to ''[[Sicko]]'', published an image of a Wikipedia user on its main page. This was combined with links to edit both ''Sicko'' and the editor's user page.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision#Michael_Moore]  Several Wikipedia editors and Administrators regarded this action on the part of [[Michael Moore]]'s official website as an egregious violation of a well publicized ruling to protect Wikipedia editors from outside harassment. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore_2] The consensus, per Wikipedia's policy was to remove links from Wikipedia to Michael Moore's attack site which was urging vengeance and reprisals against an editor who posted criticism of Moore's film.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Arbitration, Wikipedia's internal policy making and dispute resolution arm, the Arbitration chairman publicly admitted,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|No question it contained an attack, including a link to edit our user's page. The problem is that many of us like Michael Moore very much and don't care much for the viewpoint of the user involved. Applying our policy in a rote manner (Without consideration of '''the unwritten rule that we support prominent subjects that we like''') yields removal of the link (At least while it contained the personal attack).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikien-1 [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082980.html Harassment sites], Fred Bauder, Sun Oct 14 19:03:28 UTC 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View (NPOV), laid down by founder Jimbo Wales allegedly is &amp;quot;absolute and non-negotiable.&amp;quot; Few people find the claim convincing.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#_note-0] The ArbCom chairman further stated, &amp;quot;Obviously we need to make an exception for prominent people whose viewpoint we support.&amp;quot; [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082987.html] When asked, &amp;quot;How, then, is this remotely compatible with NPOV?&amp;quot;, the ArbCom chairman responded, &amp;quot;Not at all.&amp;quot; [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082993.html] The editor whom Michaelmoore.com was urging its viewers to attack and harass is described as &amp;quot;a Fellow at the [[American Enterprise Institute]], a [[conservative]] [[think tank]].&amp;quot;[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083230.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sinbad hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
On March 16, 2007, Wikipedia entry on the 50-year old entertainer Sinbad, born David Adkins, stated: &amp;quot;He succumbed to a fatal heart attack on the morning of March 14, 2007.&amp;quot;  This hoax was widely reported in the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ioltechnology.co.za/article_page.php?iSectionId=2891&amp;amp;iArticleId=3734818&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Robert Clark Young revenge edits==&lt;br /&gt;
From 2006 to 2013, Robert Clark Young, an author who had only published one novel to mixed reviews, edited Wikipedia extensively with 13,000 edits under username &amp;quot;Qworty.&amp;quot;  He engaged in aggressive behavior making revenge edits to biographical articles of his rival authors and other people against whom he held grudges. He also puffed up his own Wikipedia autobiography, and repeatedly denied that he was connected to Young.  He also created other single purpose accounts to further his campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Geri_Litton|title=Geri Litton sockpuppet investigation|date=2007|accessdate=July 11, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Qworty/Archive|title=Quorty sockpuppet inviestigant|date=2013|accessdate=July 11, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Only after his true identity was revealed in a salon.com article,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/|title=Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia|date=May 17, 2013|work=salon.com|accessdate=July 9, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was Young banned&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive797#User:Qworty|title=Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive797|accessdate=July 9, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and efforts made to reverse his vindictive edits.  In essence, he would remove favorable items from the biographies of his enemies or nominate them for deletion. The salon.com article concluded,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But Qworty’s example tells us that even when people call attention to a rogue editor, even when that editor’s temper tantrums come to the attention of the founder of Wikipedia, it’s quite possible that no action will be taken.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rutgers-Ivy League hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
A Wikipedia entry falsely stated that Rutgers was once invited to join the Ivy League.  Although that false statement was eventually removed from Wikipedia, it was not removed before the ''Daily News'' relied on it in this story:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't have to define your college with your football team, but Rutgers long ago decided to give it a try. Back in 1954, when it was considered a 'public Ivy,' Rutgers might have joined the fledgling Ivy League and altered its destiny. But the school declined the offer - arguably the dumbest mistake in its history. Ever since then, Rutgers has scrambled to prove itself worthy of playing football with the big boys.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bondy, Filip. &amp;quot;They Can Finally Say They Belong Here&amp;quot;, New York Daily News, 2006-11-10, p. 92. Retrieved on 2006-12-13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barbara Bauer vs. Wikimedia Foundation==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikimedia Foundation is one of 17 defendants in a lawsuit suit filed in New Jersey, by Barbara Bauer and her literary agency.  Her Wikipedia article was deleted on March 25, 2007 by Wikipedia administrator Doc Glasgow as a &amp;quot;bloody disgrace&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wikipedia-watch.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauertc.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{dead link}}&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wikipedia-watch.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauert1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauert2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{dead link}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==GFDL License Issue==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's practice of complete deletion of articles&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&amp;amp;page=Brian+Peppers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without reference to the original article, the author(s)/publisher(s) of the article, and the history and title(s) of the article, including modification history, description and appropriate dates, is a direct violation of at least GFDL version 1.2.  Additionally, the GFDL License states that if the article/document contains Copyright notices, that said notices must be preserved at all times. If those notices are removed, then they are in violation of Copyright Law, as well as the terms of the GFDL license.  Furthermore, the question of them removing anything outright at all comes into quite a grey area. If one reads the GFDL License literally, then it implies that once the article document is posted, it is in distribution, and technical measures are not allowed to be taken to prevent the use of the document in question, and that no other conditions whatsoever can be added by the user to those of the GFDL license.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Wikipocalypse:GF'DL&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html#TOC1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, beginning June 15, 2009, the Wikimedia Foundation began transitioning content on Wikipedia to be dual-licensed under both the GFDL and Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-06-15/News_and_notes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Censorship==&lt;br /&gt;
Among the many userboxes that are used by editors in Wikipedia, there is one that claims &amp;quot;Wikipedia is not censored&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Disavian/Userboxes/Not_Censored &amp;quot;Wikipedia is not censored&amp;quot; userbox] at Wikipedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is a lie, as Wikipedia routinely engages in censorship against any edits [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia|its editors and administrators do not like for political/ideological reasons]] (particularly involving political articles, the &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot; article, the [[GamerGate]] controversy article and articles involving gender-confused individuals and those claiming to be &amp;quot;non-binary&amp;quot;) and its leftist editors/administrators have been very quick to revert/censor such edits and to quickly block editors who make such edits to fit reality instead of the leftist editors' personal and ideological preference, wishful thinking and political correctness in defiance of reality and logic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cyberbullying==&lt;br /&gt;
The press have reported on incidents of [[cyberbullying]] on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news| url=http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/29/local/me-wikipedia29 | work=Los Angeles Times | first=Molly | last=Hennessy-Fiske | title=Wikipedia threats went unchecked – Los Angeles Times | date=29 April 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ABCLocal&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=6087243 Hacienda Heights school receives possible threat | abc7.com&amp;lt;!-- Bot generated title --&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news |title=Student arrested for violent threats on Wikipedia |first= |last= |url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2008/04/wiki.html?cid=6a00d8341c630a53ef011571abd811970b |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=29 April 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An editor threatened an Asian student at the Glen A. Wilson High School in 2008,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ABCLocal&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and a 14-year-old boy was arrested for making a threat against Niles West High School on Wikipedia in 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.pantagraph.com/news/article_baef01f3-e56f-52e1-b9af-e90eb83e811b.html|title=Teen charged after threat to school on Wikipedia|date=31 October 2006|agency=Associated Press  |publisher=Pantagraph.com|accessdate=26 January 2011|location=Bloomington, IL}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
María Sefidari, the female Chair of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Directors, is involved in a lesbian relationship with Wikipedia editor Laura Hale, which creates an inherent conflict of interest in the following controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.canberra.edu.au/researchrepository/items/d2d1d08e-20c3-4781-9072-57c8960c6c91/1/introductory_pages.pdf?attachment.uuid=a046d5df-9395-4700-a345-ebda1f122cc6|title=Thesis Acknowledgements|page=4|accessdate=July 15, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Ms. Hale has a long history, dating back to 2011 of incompetent edits and abusing male editors while making false accusations of &amp;quot;misogyny&amp;quot; against editors who correct her edits.  A long-time male administrator, Fram, followed Ms. Hale around making corrections to her problematic edits.  In turn, Ms. Hale complained to the Trust &amp;amp; Security staff of the Wikimedia Foundation, rather than to the volunteer-staffed complaint mechanisms on Wikipedia.  Although the Trust &amp;amp; Security staff has previously banned a few editors for problems involving illegal conduct such as pedophilia, in June 2019, for the first time, they suspended Fram for one year for alleged &amp;quot;incivility&amp;quot;.  In response, an English Wikipedia administrator lifted the block and was in turn stripped of his administratorship by the Foundation, and several other administrators resigned in protest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_response_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation%27s_ban_of_Fram|title=Wikipedia:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram|accessdate=June 24, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to a Buzzfeed article about the controversy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/josephbernstein/wikipedia-ban-editor-culture-war|title=The Culture War Has Finally Come For Wikipedia|date=July 27, 2019|accessdate=July 28, 2019|work=Buzzfeed News}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikimedia Foundation executive director Katharine Maher sent a tweet calling the article &amp;quot;s***ty&amp;quot;, which drew heavy criticism against her on her Twitter account from other Wikipedia editors for what they indicated was her dismissive and elitist attitude toward those opposed to the Foundation's unilateral abuse of power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://twitter.com/krmaher/status/1144394019893460993|title=tweet|accessdate=June 28, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As more Wikipedia Administrators and Bureaucrats resign or go on strike, the crisis has also been reported by Breitbart.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/06/28/wikipedia-editors-revolt-over-sites-ban-of-veteran-administrator/|title=Wikipedia Editors Revolt over Site’s Ban of Veteran Administrator|date=July 28, 2019|work=Breitbart|accessdate=July 28, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikipedia on bestiality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Wikipedia on bestiality]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted earlier, the Wikipedia project was initiated by [[atheism|atheists]] and [[entrepreneur]] Jimmy Wales and the [[agnosticism|agnostic]] [[philosophy]] [[professor]] [[Larry Sanger]] on January 15, 2001.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/lists/288/000092012/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. As of July 18, 2012, Wikipedia's article on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia zoophilia/bestiality] has an entire section on &amp;quot;arguments for zoophilia&amp;quot; plus pictures depicting zoophilia as well as a section on &amp;quot;arguments against zoophilia&amp;quot;. As of September 24, 2011, Wikipedia has a &amp;quot;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_the_law Zoophilia and the law&amp;quot;] article which has a section on the impact of zoophilia laws where eight alleged negative impacts of zoophilia laws are given, but no positive impacts of the laws are given.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_the_law#Impact_of_laws|title=Impact of laws section of &amp;quot;Zoophilia and the law&amp;quot;|date=July 17, 2012|accessdate=July 18, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Trademarks and domain names ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) uses the licensing of its trademarks as a tool to control local chapters.  Although each local chapter is in theory an autonomous organization, each chapter signs a contract with the WMF as a condition for using its trademarks.  The WMF also tried to stake out control over many domain names that contain the word &amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot; including &amp;quot;[[wikileaks]]&amp;quot;.  WikiLeaks and Wikipedia have no affiliation with each other. (&amp;quot;Wiki&amp;quot; describes a type of website and is not a trademark.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiLeaks_is_not_part_of_Wikipedia |title=Wikipedia:WikiLeaks is not part of Wikipedia |work=Wikipedia |publisher=[[Wikimedia Foundation]] |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/wiki-giants-on-a-collision-course-over-shared-name-2065561.html |title=Wiki giants on a collision course over shared name |last1=Rawlinson |first1=Kevin |first2=Tom |last2=Peck |date=30 August 2010 |work=The Independent |location=London |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikia did purchase several WikiLeaks-related domain names (including wikileaks.com and wikileaks.net) as a &amp;quot;protective brand measure&amp;quot; in 2007.&amp;lt;ref name=wikia&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.wikia.com/Press:Wikia_Does_Not_Own_Wikileaks_Domain_Names |title=Press:Wikia Does Not Own Wikileaks Domain Names |work=[[Wikia]] |publisher=[[Wikia]] |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikia started to transfer those domain names to WikiLeaks on June 14, 2007, but the transfer was never completed, and Wikia held those domain names when the &amp;quot;Wikileaks scandal&amp;quot; broke.&amp;lt;ref name=wikia/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Humorous quotes concerning Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...dealing with the Wikipedians is like walking into a mental hospital: the floors are carpeted, the walls are nicely padded, but you know there’s a pretty good chance at any given moment one of the inmates will pick up a knife.” - quote from a ''[[New York Times]]'' article on Wikipedia written by the journalist and author Judith Newman&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/fashion/Wikipedia-Judith-Newman.html?smid=pl-share Wikipedia-Mania: Wikipedia, What Does Judith Newman Have to Do to Get a Page?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An article entitled ''Wikipedia Gridlocked by Wikipedia Nerds'' declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|So who are these Gatekeepers to all the internet's knowledge?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A survey the foundation conducted last year determined that the average age of an editor is 26.8 years, and that 87% of them are men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you suspected: [[nerd]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gawker.com/5410917/wikipedia-gridlocked-by-wikipedia-nerds&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jimmy Wales said the typical profile of a Wikipedia contributor is &amp;quot;a 26-year-old geeky male&amp;quot; who moves on to other ventures, gets married, and leaves the website.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/5397593/Wikipedia-losing-contributors-founder-says Wikipedia losing contributors, founder says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seth Meyers noted on his ''Late Night'' program, &amp;quot;Wikipedia is now accepting donations using the online currency Bitcoin. So now you can support information you're not sure is true with currency you're not sure is money.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thespec.com/living-story/4733681-tuesdayfile/ Retrieved August 8, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When obscure author Patrick Modiano was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in October 2014, few journalists knew much about him.  The person updating his Wikipedia biography to reflect the prize added this warning to the article, &amp;quot;To the Reporter Now Copying From Wikipedia: Be careful boy. Primary sources are still best for journos.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/10/09/nobel_prize_winner_patrick_modiano_s_wikipedia_page_changed_to_add_note.html|title=A Reminder to Journalists Writing About the New Nobel Prize Winner, From Wikipedia|first=Forrest |last=Wickman|date=October 9, 2014|work=Slate|accessdate=October 10, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_Modiano&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=628920987&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unbiased editor recruitment==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia claims that anyone can edit it.  That is true to an extent,but its editor pool is self-selecting.  However, on  January 25–29, 2012, the Wikimedia Foundation paid for Gregory Varnum and others to attend and staff a booth at the &amp;quot;24th National Conference on LGBT Equality: Creating Change&amp;quot; conference in Baltimore, Maryland.  The purpose of the Wikimedia booth was to recruit more LGBT activists to edit Wikipedia.  Although Wikimedia has outreach efforts at other conferences, there has been no outreach at conservative events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia editor [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch Sarah Stierch] was the volunteer moderator of the Gender Gap email list where she departed from discussing Wikipedia to freely share her negative experiences with men in her life.  In fall 2011, she was hired by the WMF as a Community Fellow to work on creating a &amp;quot;Teahouse&amp;quot; for newer Wikipedia editors. The report on the Teahouse Pilot Project&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Research:Teahouse/Pilot_Report&amp;amp;oldid=3832292|title=Teahouse: Pilot Report|date=June 14, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; explained, &amp;quot;If you click through to the Teahouse, it’s clearly aiming to broaden female participation - just look at the pastel background and references to tea.&amp;quot; Stierch tried to use Twitter to recruit more female editors into Teahouse and the English Wikipedia. The report concluded, &amp;quot;Because so much time and energy needed to be spend during the pilot on setting up and maintaining the space, we weren't able to focus as much as we'd have liked on gender-targeted strategies for recruiting female guests and hosts. There are clearly more experiments that need to be run in order to better integrate the space with other gender gap efforts and WikiWomen's calls to actions.&amp;quot;  The WMF terminated Stierch on January 9, 2014 following complaints of her moonlighting as a paid editor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-January/129466.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 18, 2014, during the Congressional summer recess, the [[Cato Institute]] and Wikimedia DC jointly conducted a seminar to encourage Congressional staff members to edit Wikipedia about pending legislation and policy issues.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/08/18/a-call-to-edit-congress-and-wikipedia-told-to-peacefully-co-exist/|title=A call to edit: Congress and Wikipedia told to peacefully co-exist|first=Nancy|last=Scola|date=August 18, 2014|accessdate=August 22, 2014|work=Washington Post}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.c-span.org/video/?321030-1/discussion-wikipedia-government-transparency|date=August 18, 2014|accessdate=August 22, 2014|title=Wikipedia and Congress|work=C-SPAN}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The panel discussion included Michelle Newby, a full-time Cato employee who edits Wikipedia as a part of her job.  She promised to work with any Congressional Staff that would be interested in editing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flaws in governance structure==&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps Wikipedia's greatest structural problem is Jimmy Wales' inability to remove himself from the process. He calls himself a &amp;quot;God-King&amp;quot; and rules the site with the style of [[monarchy]], robbing it of its potential to achieve some form of [[Jeffersonian]] [[democracy]] and accountability. Wales once speculated that all significant productivity emerged from his circle of a few hundred personal friends while the rest of the world groped along doing only spelling and punctuation mark corrections and other trivial modifications. The computer programmer and activist Aaron Swartz did a proper analysis and showed that the productivity was the results of many, many thousands of anonymous users. Swartz later committed [[suicide]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales delegated the run-of-the-mill decision-marking to a hand-picked group he called the Arbitration Committee. They take months to make any decisions and dole out multi-month to multi-year or permanent intervention solutions. A reputable encyclopedia usually simply chooses an Editor-in-Chief, i.e. one reputable, mature and experienced person with one mind to make high-quality decisions rapidly and perhaps dispense moderate penalties when needed. Sanger served as such, but Wales, an [[Objectivist]] economics major and former stock options trader, opted to drastically reduce his salary when it became clear that the project would be a success, thus forcing him out. Wales has since been making a living, in part, by promoting his notions of governance of Internet-based projects, often emphasizing that users should remain anonymous and thus without any serious form of credential or reputation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problems are in the structure and in the personality flaws of Wales himself. Wales takes advantage of this vast pool of free labor to hunt his perceived enemies, somewhat in the style of [[L. Ron Hubbard]] or other such supposed founders of movements.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equally important are the flawed steps that Wales took to separate the community of volunteer Wikipedia editors from the financial control of the enterprise.  The servers and software are owned by the [[Wikimedia Foundation]] (WMF), a non-profit organization that at first was set up as a membership organization, but quickly changed to a non-membership organization so that members would not have any legal say regarding the organization.  Although people who have made a required minimum number of edits per year can vote for members of the Arbitration Committee and for a minority of the WMF Board seats, at least one community-elected Board member was removed because he did not agree with the majority of the Board.  Of course, Wales is guaranteed a perpetual WMF Board seat as a co-founder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally, revenue from fundraising banners in the United States went to the WMF, but banner revenue in foreign countries went to the chapters located in those countries.  In recent years, the WMF has consolidated all fundraising revenues, with national chapters being forced to apply for specific grants from the WMF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To further complicate the financial controls, the WMF established a separate endowment at the [[Tides Foundation]] which is controlled by that foundation in consultation with an advisory board. Instead of having a community-selected advisory board or the entire WMF Board serving as the advisory board, the Tides Foundation appointed a new group with Wales and large donors serving.  When the endowment reaches its fundraising target, the advisory board decides whether the funds should stay at the Tides Foundation, be transferred to the WMF, or used in some other way.  So, if Wales has a falling out with the WMF Board over the next ten years, he and his hand-picked advisory board could take the Wikipedia endowment somewhere else. The editing community has no say in the endowment—who manages it or how the income will be spent.&lt;br /&gt;
==Core Policies==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia has three policies that it calls its core policies. These are Neutral Point of View, Verifiability, and No Original Research. Despite designating these three policies as &amp;quot;core&amp;quot;, Wikipedia barely even cares about them, especially with cases in regard to atheism. Wikipedia has reverted well-substantiated edits for disagreeing with atheism numerous times, gone several paragraphs on pro-atheism topics without citing a single source, banned Creation Ministries International employees for an indefinite amount of times despite said employees having not violated any written policy, and more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Wikipedia|Articles about '''Wikipedia''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:The Protocols of Ritual Defamation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia prejudice and KAL 007]] (Wikipedia deletion material related to [[New World Order]] and [[Larry McDonald]], touching [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]])&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Deletionpedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Wikipedia and Citizendium]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/aug/21/conservatives-miss-wikipedias-threat/ SHEFFIELD: Conservatives miss Wikipedia's threat] by [[Washington Times]], August 21, 2008 &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/print.html Wikipedia black helicopters circle Utah's Traverse Mountain], By Cade Metz, ''The Register'', 6 December 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/15/wikipedia_can_damage_your_grades/ Avoid Wikipedia, warns Wikipedia chief - It can seriously damage your grades] by Andrew Orlowski, ''The Register'', June 15, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/18/wikipedia_quality_problem/ Wikipedia founder admits to serious quality problems] by Andrew Orlowski, ''The Register'', October 18, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia Who Writes Wikipedia?] by Aaron Swartz, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/07/05/wikipedias-seven-worst-moments/ Wikipedia’s Seven Worst Moments] by Charlie Nash, ''Breitbart News'', July 5, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://evolutionnews.org/2017/11/wikipedia-and-astroturf/ Wikipedia and “Astroturf”] Sarah Chaffee, Evolution News. November 30, 2017 (Journalist [[Sharyl Attkisson]]).&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://oedb.org/ilibrarian/top-7-alternatives-to-wikipedia/  Top 7 Alternatives to Wikipedia] Open Education Database. (Includes Conservapedia along with six other online encyclopedias, criticizes Wikipedia for inaccuracies and hypocrisy.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/01/2013-is-starting-off-to-be-bad-year-for.html Study shows that the world's biggest pro-evolution website is driving away newcomer editors! Also, video shows evolutionists at Wikipedia are clowns!]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wikipediocracy.com Wikipediocracy]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia_controversies Wikipedia's List of Wikipedia controversies]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/story/2704 Wikipedia: What Is It Good For?], By Dick Clark, 9/19/2007. Retrieved from The Ludwig von Mises Institute, http://www.mises.org/ November 5, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MoVLl_ne2Y Wikipedias' Own Cofounder Lambastes the Site for Bias]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Encyclopedias]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikimedia Foundation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;diff=1733524</id>
		<title>Wikipedia</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Wikipedia&amp;diff=1733524"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T23:51:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: that's not citationed, as much as it is correct&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Wpp.png|thumb|right|200px|The multilingual Wikipedia home page]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Wikipedia''' is an [[internet|online]] [[wiki]]-based [[encyclopedia]] hosted and owned by the non-profit organization [[Wikimedia Foundation]] and financially supported by grants from left-leaning foundations plus an aggressive annual online fundraising drive.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20180527010133/http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_releases/Wikimedia_Foundation_announces_tenth_annual_fundraising_campaign&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Most of Wikipedia's articles can be edited publicly by both registered and anonymous editors,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://books.google.com/books?id=wMhBQ0WdjF4C&amp;amp;pg=PA199#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; mostly consisting of teenagers and the unemployed.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;theregister.co.uk&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/09/18/sanger_forks_wikipedia/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As such, it tends to project a [[liberal]]—and, in some cases, even [[socialist]], [[Communist]], and [[Nazi]]-sympathising—worldview, which is totally at odds with [[conservative]] [[reality]] and rationality.[[citation needed]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia was co-founded by [[Jimbo Wales]] (an [[Atheism|atheist]], [[libertarian]], and [[objectivist]]), and philosophy professor [[Larry Sanger]] in 2001.  The website was originally created to complement the now-defunct peer-reviewed online encyclopedia [[Nupedia]] as a way for collaboration on articles. However, Wikipedia overtook Nupedia and became an independent project hosted by the [[Wikimedia Foundation]], which also hosts various related websites, known as &amp;quot;sister projects&amp;quot;, such as ''Wikinews'' and ''Wikibooks''.  Co-founder Larry Sanger later acknowledged that Wikipedia does not follow its own neutrality policy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SangerNeutrality&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/larry-sanger-co-founder-of-wikipedia-agrees-that-it-does-not-follow-its-own-neutrality-policy/ Uncommon Descent, December 1, 2016, Posted by Barry Arrington]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of Wikipedia state that Wikipedia's articles contain [[Examples of bias in Wikipedia|systemic bias]],&amp;lt;ref name=howtheleft&amp;gt;http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-swindle/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and that the information included within its articles are a mixture of truths, [[half-truth]]s, and falsehoods.&amp;lt;ref name=hnn&amp;gt;http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/125437&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The nature of Wikipedia also makes it subject to spin and [[bias]], examples of which include paid public relations advocacy and inserting libelous content into the biographies of politicians for a political purpose.&amp;lt;ref name=hnn/&amp;gt; Wikipedia was also criticized for having a [[liberal bias]] in its articles about politics, despite Wikipedia's &amp;quot;neutral point of view&amp;quot; policy.&amp;lt;ref name=howtheleft/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their biased admins causes people to get blocked for little to no reason.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Continuing loss of influence ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's traffic level stems from its high placement in Google searches, and that many people rely upon it for quick research regarding trivial facts.  However, users are turning to alternatives such as the voice-based iPhone application [[Siri]] or the Knowledge Graph display on Google search result pages of key facts about search targets.&amp;lt;ref name=timesindia&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tech/tech-news/internet/Google-eating-into-Wikipedia-page-views/articleshow/29072825.cms?referral=PM|title=Google eating into Wikipedia page views?|work=Times of India|first=Subodh |last=Varma|date=January 20, 2014|accessdate=March 20, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia page-views dropped by 2 billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Wikipedia's most popular versions are leading the decline: page-views of the English Wikipedia dropped by 12 percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost 9 percent.&amp;lt;ref name=timesindia/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to the number of visitors declining, there continues to be a drop in active editors as well.  In August 2012, it was reported that Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/pro-evolution-wikipedia-has-shrinking.html Pro-evolution Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors plus [[Quora]] is Wikipedia's worst nightmare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; At the same time, ''Business Insider'' indicated [[Quora]] was &amp;quot;Wikipedia's worst nightmare&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/08/pro-evolution-wikipedia-has-shrinking.html Pro-evolution Wikipedia has a shrinking base of editors plus Quora is Wikipedia's worst nightmare]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Unreliability of Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia relies on self-selected &amp;quot;editors&amp;quot; to write and compile articles, with no preference given for scholars in the fields about which they are writing. This fact may disqualify Wikipedia from being considered a genuine encyclopedia, ironically even by its own standards. An encyclopedia is supposed to be a collection of articles by &amp;quot;well-educated, well-informed content experts.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Theoretically, Wikipedia is supposed to compensate for this weakness by requiring references to reputable secondary sources. But editors can delete, without collaboration, any text or entry they dislike, citing one of the many Wikipedia guidelines for doing so. Entries posted by scholars in the field, based on peer-reviewed, academic articles are deleted by editors with an ideological bias. Wikipedia, then, only represents the majority view of its editors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the contribution of volunteer editors has declined, some of the void has been replaced by paid public relations professionals.  These paid editors seek to present their client companies or individuals in the best possible light.  This has resulted in many articles being transformed into paid advertising pieces that take advantage of the English Wikipedia's high placement on Google search results.  This chronic problem has become so severe that the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed amending its terms of service to require disclosures of paid editing conflicts of interest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use/Paid_contributions_amendment|title=Terms of use/Paid contributions amendment|date=February 21, 2014|accessdate=March 20, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the competition to control content, the paid PR editors win out because they are monitoring pages as a full-time job, while editors seeking to keep content more balanced are only part-time volunteers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the ''American Journalism Review'' declared concerning Wikipedia:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;An even more blunt assessment appears in the encyclopedia's &amp;quot;Ten things you may not know about Wikipedia&amp;quot; posting: &amp;quot;We do not expect you to trust us. It is in the nature of an ever-changing work like Wikipedia that, while some articles are of the highest quality of scholarship, others are admittedly complete rubbish.&amp;quot; It also reminds users not to use Wikipedia as a primary source or for making &amp;quot;critical decisions.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4461&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
Despite its official &amp;quot;neutrality policy,&amp;quot; [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia|Wikipedia has a strong liberal bias.]] In an article entitled &amp;quot;Wikipedia Lies, Slander Continue,&amp;quot; [[journalism|journalist]] [[Joseph Farah]] stated Wikipedia &amp;quot;is not only a provider of inaccuracy and bias. It is a wholesale purveyor of lies and slander unlike any other the world has ever known.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wnd.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=83640&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Mr. Farah has repeatedly been the victim of defamation on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wnd.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  In December 2010, [[Christian apologetics|Christian apologist]] [[JP Holding]] called Wikipedia &amp;quot;the abomination that causes misinformation&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://tektonticker.blogspot.com/search/label/Wikipedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some say that Wikipedia's unreliability is systemic, citing Douglas Adams: &amp;quot;''In other words—and this is the rock-solid principle on which the whole of the Corporation’s Galaxywide success is founded—their fundamental design flaws are completely hidden by their superficial design flaws.'' Wikipedia, which is written by anyone, still struggles to solve the need for traditional quality controls characteristic of conventional [[encyclopedia]]s. The self-policing practices have produced results and accuracy some claim is far better than originally expected but still widely questioned. Research released in April 2012 claimed 60% of Wikipedia articles contain &amp;quot;inaccuracies&amp;quot;, leading the ''[[Daily Mail]]'' to dub it &amp;quot;Iffy-Pedia&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2131458/Up-articles-Wikipedia-contain-factual-errors.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The lack of consistency and uniform supervision leaves an ever-present shadow over any given piece of information. Many in the [[College|academy]] insist that it is an unreliable source for [[research]] and an unacceptable reference in many classrooms. However, Wikipedia steers people to original [[Source|source material]], and with the use of hyperlinks and [[search engine]]s, it has become the most widely used intermediary reference tool on the [[Internet]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the style manual for the [[Associated Press]], the largest news agency in the United States, Wikipedia should not be used as a primary source, but the hyperlinks in articles may be helpful as sources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia has millions of entries on trivia and mundane topics ranging from an explanation for &amp;quot;duh&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duh (only after Conservapedia criticized the entry on the English word &amp;quot;duh&amp;quot; did Wikipedia eventually remove it)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to singles by obscure rock bands&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;such as ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honk_If_You_Love_Fred_Durst Honk If You Love Fred Durst]'' (accessed April 1, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to arcane British nobility.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Part of the article about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Liddell Henry Liddell], a 19th-century Vice-chancellor of Oxford University and author, includes that his grandfather was the youngest son of the 8th Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne, and that his daughter was the child ''Alice in Wonderland'' was written for (accessed April 1, 2007)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; There are editions of Wikipedia in 250 languages, and 130 have more than 1000 articles.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias List of Wikipedias - Wikimedia], accessed April 1, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After about four years Wikipedia had about 450,000 entries,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aaron Weiss, The Unassociated Press, N.Y. Times, Feb. 10, 2005, at G5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and after six years it had about 1.7 million entries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics English Wikipedia statistics] accessed April 1, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Four years later this number had more than doubled again: in November 2011, there were more than 3.8 million content pages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics English Wikipedia statistics] accessed May 6, 2011&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As of February 2014, there are more than 4.4 million &amp;quot;content&amp;quot; pages, many of which lack educational value. On important topics, the information is often misleading due to the unchecked, [[Wikipedia#Leftist bias|systematic liberal bias]] that dominates Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of Wikipedia articles can vary greatly.  Some articles, particularly about narrow topics and those of little interest, are well written and appear to have input from one or more subject matter experts.  Articles about broader topics and with high viewership naturally have more editors, many of whom are not well versed in the subject matter.  In determining the quality of an article it is helpful to check the sources or references to see if one or more of the standard references for the topic is frequently cited.  Often the most valuable feature of an article will be to direct the reader to good quality references, if they exist.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Origins==&lt;br /&gt;
Initially, Wikipedia was hosted on servers operated by Bomis, Inc., a company that also sold pornographic pictures.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Martin Hickman and Genevieve Roberts, &amp;quot;WIKIPEDIA,&amp;quot; The Independent (London) p. 12 (Feb 13, 2006)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The majority owner of Bomis had lost his fortune in a lawsuit, and the Wikipedia volunteers feared that if all of Bomis' assets were seized, ownership of Wikipedia would be transferred.  In 2003, Jimbo Wales addressed this risk by founding the Wikimedia Foundation to take control of Wikipedia's assets. The Wikimedia Foundation is a non-profit organization that provides support for Wikipedia and other similar projects,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Home Wikimedia Foundation] accessed April 7, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and also the free MediaWiki software that runs Wikipedia and Conservapedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki MediaWiki home] accessed April 7, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It also gives out millions of dollars in grants each year to liberal causes that recruit liberals to edit Wikipedia so as to reflect their biases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leftist bias ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Leftist roots of Wikipedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia shows a systematic bias in the proportion of articles which treat controversial issues.  It ignores its own [[NPOV]] policy when it allows contributors to &amp;quot;delete well-referenced information&amp;quot; merely because it comes from a [[scientist]] who holds a minority view. It would only be a violation, if the article used the information to give a false impression of the proportion of scientists adhering to that view, but liberals use &amp;quot;undue weight&amp;quot; like a sledge hammer. They are either unaware or unconcerned about their bias.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not surprising, given this [[Zogby]] poll:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While 97% of [[Republican]]s surveyed said the media are [[liberal]], two-thirds of [[political independent]]s feel the same, but fewer than one in four independents (23%) said they saw a &amp;quot;conservative bias&amp;quot;. [[Democrat]]s, while much more likely to perceive a conservative bias than other groups, were not nearly as sure the [[media]] was against them as were the Republicans. While Republicans were unified in their perception of a [[left-wing]] media, just two-thirds of Democrats were certain the media skewed [[right-wing|right]] – and 17% said the bias favored the left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1262&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
David Swindle writes at [[FrontPage Magazine]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There was not a single ideological vision driving Wikipedia’s founders and core contributors as they launched the project. Jimmy Wales, who would become the face of the project and its “benevolent dictator,” according to Andrew Lih’s ''The Wikipedia Revolution​'', is a libertarian and [[Ayn Rand|Ayn Rand​ian]] [[Objectivism|Objectivist]]. Also important in shaping Wikipedia was the so-called “hacker ethos,” the culture that has developed amongst computer programmers over the last 40 years and been shaped by the Left, the counterculture, popular culture, and [[anarchism|anarchist]] thought.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What binds together these ideologies is a [[utopia]]n ideal that human beings are more prone to [[altruism]] rather than self-interest. In Wikipedia Revolution Wales is quoted as saying, “Generally we find most people out there on the internet are good… It’s one of the wonderful humanitarian discoveries in Wikipedia, that most people only want to help us and build this free nonprofit, charitable resource.” Ward Cunningham was the programmer who created the wiki concept and software. According to Lih, he believed in the Wiki because “People are generally good.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lih explains how this philosophy is embedded within Wikipedia’s rules:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A core idea Wikipedia embraced.. was to assume good faith when interacting with others. The guideline promoted optimistic production rather than pessimistic nay-saying, and reads, “Unless there is strong evidence to the contrary, assume that people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it; avoid accusing others of harmful motives without particularly strong evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as it worked out, Wikipedia in practice has strayed from these utopian ideas because of the ease with which political and social bias trumps altruism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After almost a decade of rapid growth and free-wheeling experimentation the situation at the site by the Summer of 2009 was chaos. Political operatives would sabotage one another in electoral contests by vandalizing pages. More malicious misinformation filtered in freely, with living historical figures accused of involvement in conspiratorial plots.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/23/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia co-founder [[Larry Sanger]], who left the site, later acknowledged that Wikipedia does not follow its own neutrality policy.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SangerNeutrality&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Peter-Singer.jpg|right|thumbnail|250px|The atheist philosopher [[Peter Singer]] defends the practice of [[bestiality]] (as well as [[abortion]], infanticide and [[euthanasia]]).  Despite holding these immoral views the [[liberal]] and pro-[[evolution]] academic establishment rewarded his views with a bioethics chair at [[Princeton University]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://creation.com/the-basis-of-a-christian-worldview The Basis of a Christian Worldview - Creation Ministries International]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://creation.com/answer-to-philosophy-religion-professor-on-biblical-exegesis-and-the-problem-of-evil CMI answers philosophy/religion professor on biblical exegesis and the problem of evil]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2011/06/the-dangerous-mind-of-peter-singer ''The Dangerous Mind''] by Joe Carter, ''[[First Things]]''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  See: [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Wikipedia on bestiality]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia also has an automatic Wikimedia Commons editing software called &amp;quot;Commonist,&amp;quot; which allows the user to upload multiple files at once.  The symbol of [[communism]] - the &amp;quot;hammer and sickle&amp;quot; of the leftist ideology which murdered millions in the former [[Soviet Union]] - is featured prominently on the instruction page as well as the tags that mark each uploaded image.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Commonist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Research ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 23, 2011, David Swindle published an article at ''[[FrontPage Magazine]]'' detailing how Wikipedia has been taken over by the [[Leftist|political left]] and he cited statistics relating to Wikipedia's articles on [[Anne Coulter]], [[Michael Moore]], [[Glenn Beck]] and [[Keith Olbermann]] which helped demonstrate the Wikipedia has a leftist/liberal bias plus he discussed the liberal/leftist cultural foundations of Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://frontpagemag.com/2011/08/23/how-the-left-conquered-wikipedia-part-1/ How the left conquered Wikipedia - Part 1]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, Swindle wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Consider Ann Coulter versus Michael Moore​. Coulter’s entry (on August 9, 2011) was 9028 words long.* Of this longer-than-usual entry, 3220 words were devoted to “Controversies and criticism” in which a series of incidents involving Coulter and quotes from her are cited with accompanying condemnations, primarily from her opponents on the Left. That’s 35.6 percent of Coulter’s entry devoted to making her look bad. By contrast, Moore’s entry is 2876 words (the more standard length for entries on political commentators), with 130 devoted to “Controversy.” That’s 4.5% of the word count, a fraction of Coulter’s. Does this mean that an “unbiased” commentator would find Coulter eight times as “controversial” as Moore?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;frontpagemag.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Talk Pages ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of Wikipedia's leftist bias is clearly evident from their talk pages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, when an article about the Barcelona May Days&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:May_Days&amp;amp;oldid=903699178&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an event during the Spanish Civil War where hundreds of anti-Stalinist Trotskyists and anarchists were gunned down by the pro-Stalin Republican government) portrayed the anti-Stalinist side, which contained author George Orwell, in a generally favourable light, Stalinists filled the talk page with childish attacks on the authors of the article, including expletives, as is characteristic of Wikipedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Purported &amp;quot;Tertiary&amp;quot; Source and Arbitrary Standards==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia purports to be a &amp;quot;tertiary&amp;quot; source, relying on edited work from reputable sources. The policy is meant to build on the work of qualified editors of secondary sources. Some accuse Wikipedia, therefore, of relying on [[hearsay]], and discouraging the application of [[logic]] and new development of new insights. The result is an agglomeration of reheated &amp;quot;consensus&amp;quot; with little or no intellectual merit of its own; in particular, it is impossible to challenge orthodoxy, received wisdom or commonly held misconceptions through the Wikipedia system, no matter how factually incorrect those orthodoxies might be. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Supporters of Wikipedia would claim that relying on secondary sources encourages reliability and objectivity. However, there are cases of Wikipedia applying it's standards arbitrarily. For example, the case of Wikipedia editor &amp;quot;Yeoberry&amp;quot; (user ID 3606936), an editor with a Ph.D. in church history who first posted materials about &amp;quot;Icons&amp;quot; on August 6, 2012, with multiple citations to historical documents. The material was removed and Yeoberry was told that Wikipedia is a &amp;quot;tertiary&amp;quot; source and so he needed to find reliable secondary sources. On April 4, 2013, Yeoberry again added largely the same material, this time citing a newly published academic paper in a peer-reviewed journal. The information was again removed, with editors, at least some of whom religiously affiliated with the organization supporting icons, claiming the editor had a &amp;quot;COI&amp;quot; (conflict of interest). Neither time did the editors removing Yeoberry's material consult Yeoberry. But when Yeoberry reverted to his edition, he was charged with &amp;quot;edit warring.&amp;quot; When Yeoberry challenged the arbitrary use of Wikipedia criteria he was blocked from editing indefinitely and then his access to his own talk page was also blocked.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;amp;oldid=548948980#Proposal:_Indefinite_Block&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia articles, especially on controversial or political and religious topics, are often guarded by editors who have an interest in slanting the content of the article, may have no formal education on the topic, and can find a so-called reason for suppressing the information they want to suppress. Editors can claim the source is unreliable (as they interpret that); that information gives &amp;quot;UNDUE&amp;quot; weight to the topic the information is about; peer-reviewed, academic articles written by scholars can be removed by editors if, in the opinion of an editor, the view expressed is &amp;quot;Fringe&amp;quot; or if the contributor has a &amp;quot;COI&amp;quot; (conflict of interest) if he's the author of the secondary source or has an advanced education or other interest in the topic; etc. Editors with advanced education in a topic, citing sources from peer-reviewed journals, can have their contributions deleted and their participation prohibited if a few other editors, without such qualification but with enough knowledge of the Wikipedia jargon, decide to suppress him or her. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally, encyclopedias were written by scholars, either by one or a few whose knowledge is considered &amp;quot;encyclopedic&amp;quot; (i.e. very broad) or each article is written by an expert in the field. But in Wikipedia, expertise in a given field can disqualify one from contributing in that field resulting in Wikipedia being accused of being a &amp;quot;[[idiocracy]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though Wikipedia is non-profit, the [[Wikia]] project of its co-founder is very much for-profit and has raised millions of dollars in [[venture capital]]. Already Wikipedia has been criticized for favoring Wikia. When Wikipedia community voted 61-39% percent to treat all links to other sites equally by removing nofollow (Google-ignored) tags for all of them, the Wikipedia co-founder overruled this decision and Wikipedia now favors Wikia in its treatment of nofollow tags.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/04/28/wikipedia-special-treatment-for-wikia-and-other-wikis/|title=Wikipedia: Special Treatment for Wikia and some other Wikis|author=Nik Cubrilovic|date=April 28, 2007|accessdate=July 22, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-January/061137.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''The Register'' said:&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;theregister.co.uk&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
:Wikipedia has tried to balance the Utopian goal of &amp;quot;an encyclopedia anyone can edit&amp;quot; with the more utilitarian goal of &amp;quot;a website anyone would want to read&amp;quot;. With over a million articles, and a rulebook almost as dense, Wikipedia has demonstrated an insatiable desire to participate, create lists and generate procedures. The result is a huge silo of recorded trivia, and perhaps the world's largest, most distributed bureaucracy - mostly manned by a casual staff of teenagers and the unemployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the past few years, Wikipedia has added banners begging for money from its viewers. The site claims to be in need of more funding, but in fact it is &amp;quot;awash with cash - and raises far more money each year than it needs to keep operating.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/20/cash_rich_wikipedia_chugging/ Wikipedia doesn't need your money - so why does it keep pestering you?], 20 December 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia, a registered trademark of Wikimedia Foundation, is used also by services like WikiExperts.us, which is declared as not being affiliated with it.&lt;br /&gt;
WikiExperts.us accepts money to write Wikipedia entries for businesses and is included in American business ventures of Alex Konanykhin, the Former Russian oligarch, who has been wanted in Russia since Yeltsin's days to face charges relating to embezzlement and financial fraud.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title='Not terrorists': Hysteria over MH17 fails to take account of both law and facts |author=Roslyn Fuller |date=July 25, 2014 |accessdate=July 26, 2014 |url=http://rt.com/op-edge/175496-hysteria-mh17-ukraine-facts-terrorists/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scandals and decline==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wikipedia scandals.jpg|thumb|450px|right|Decline in Wikimedia Foundation donations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://centiare.com/Wikipedia_scandals Wikipedia scandals]. Retrieved from centiare.com October 10, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;Graph courtesy [http://www.centiare.com/Directory:Gregory_J._Kohs Gregory Kohs].  Used with Permission.]]The cumulative effect of multiple scandals and revelations has led to declining activity on the English Wikipedia. The rate of new account creation peaked in early 2007 and has declined ~30% since.  Overall editing activity showed a steady decline beginning in February 2007. An independent analysis reported, &amp;quot;The rate at which edits were being made to Wikipedia articles appears to have peaked in February to April 2007 and declined since. This decline is unprecedented in Wikipedia's history.... Though it may be purely coincidental, this time frame also corresponds to the Essjay controversy appearing in the press.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2007-October/033661.html Statistical Decline of the English Wikipedia], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dragons_flight/Log_analysis Dragons flight/Log analysis], October 9, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even after the hoax was revealed of high level intimates promoted by the Wikimedia Foundation as experts in fields that they were not, to persuade college professors to allow students to cite Wikipedia as a reliable source, and entrusted with the ability to invade users privacy which could affect, in their words, &amp;quot;life and death,&amp;quot; Wikipedia still appealed to students with a Jim and Tammy Faye Baker-style fundraising slogan across one million project space pages that read, &amp;quot;OMG! Wikipedia is gone! I’ll flunk my exams!&amp;quot; [http://whygive.wikimedia.org/2007/11/24/omg-wikipedia-is-gone-ill-flunk-my-exams/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further evidence of the decline in Wikipedia is that the number of editors who voted in the 2012 Arbitration Committee elections has dropped to 858.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2012#Turnout|title=Arbitration Commitee Elections December 2012|accessdate=December 18, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For a website that claims to have thousands of active editors, this is very low.  Active editors are discouraged from voting because all voters are subject to automatic investigation and invasion of their privacy to determine if they are &amp;quot;sockpuppets&amp;quot; of other voters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://archive.is/6tiF8|title=Wikipedia's &amp;quot;scrutineers&amp;quot; snoop on living arrangements of contributors|work=Examiner|first=Greg|last=Kohs|date=December 11, 2013|accessdate=December 15, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Shane Fitzgerald Hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the death of composer Maurice Jarre, a Wikipedia editor named Shane Fitzgerald attached a quote to Jarre's page: &amp;quot;One could say my life itself has been one long soundtrack. Music was my life, music brought me to life, and music is how I will be remembered long after I leave this life. When I die there will be a final waltz playing in my head, that only I can hear.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hoaxes.org/archive/permalink/the_maurice_jarre_wikipedia_hoax/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The words are poetic, yet were never spoken by Jarre, and meant to appeal to news journalists seeking information.  It was cited in many newspapers as a genuine quote before its removal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/id/30699302/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/student-hoaxes-worlds-media-wikipedia/#.WLNTW5ArLrc&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Had Fitzgerald not confessed to the lie and informed major newspapers, it is likely that the quote would have been cited to one of them.  In the days following, only one newspaper (''[[The Guardian]]'') publicly apologized for the use of a source that can be a tool for duping the public.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/may/04/journalism-obituaries-shane-fitzgerald&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Other newspapers, such as the [[Washington Post]], simply deleted their articles from online archives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==False claim about Brent Bozell==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2007, [[Brent Bozell]] described this falsehood in Wikipedia:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://archive.mrc.org/BozellColumns/newscolumn/2007/col20070320.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The other day, [[Bernie Goldberg]] emailed me, upset. He pointed me to his Wikipedia entry. To read what was written was to conclude that apparently I must hate his guts. But we are friends. He is a man for whom I have profound respect, professional and personal. He knew there was foul play.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Right there on the screen, under the heading &amp;quot;Criticism,&amp;quot; it stated that I had attacked him, &amp;quot;claiming that Goldberg merely lifted material he had been producing for years, and only published the book because he had an ax to grind with his former employers and was attempting to make a 'quick buck,' noting that Goldberg never mentioned the alleged liberal bias of the media until it was 'convenient' and 'profitable' for him to do so.&amp;quot;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:In fact, those words have never been uttered by me. The accusation would be false. Back in 1996, Goldberg used the op-ed pages of ''The Wall Street Journal'' publicly to castigate his own network for its one-sided oafish bashing of [[Steve Forbes]].  It was anything but &amp;quot;convenient&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;profitable&amp;quot; for him. It ruined his friendship with [[Dan Rather]] and put him on a path to the outer fringes of CBS News. Ultimately, it ruined his newscaster career.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:My attorney contacted Wikipedia by email demanding the removal of this false entry. No response. So we edited out the offensive material ourselves, after which in writing counsel alerted Wikipedia to the legal action that might befall them should this be repeated. Here's full disclosure, Wikipedia-style: You can see how each article is altered, sometimes hour by hour, in its &amp;quot;History&amp;quot; section. But there is no mention of the attorney's complaints. In the Goldberg article's history, an editor simply now scolds: &amp;quot;Bozell's article is a mock-jealous swipe at Goldberg's opportunism. PLEASE REREAD IT.&amp;quot; (Capitals theirs.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Goldberg and I are not alone. The website Conservapedia.com has a [[Bias in Wikipedia|long list]] of 41 allegations of bias and factual errors at Wikipedia. You can add to that the problem with the credentials of its staff. One of its editors, named only &amp;quot;Essjay&amp;quot; online and described on his user profile &amp;quot;as a tenured professor of religion at a private university with expertise in canon law,&amp;quot; was recently exposed as a 24-year-old college kid in Kentucky. He resigned in disgrace — even though Wikipedia tried to retain him, claiming he'd edited thousands of articles with flair.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead of apologizing to Brent Bozell, '''Wikipedia instead says &amp;quot;Bozell points to Conservapedia as a resource that documents Wikipedia's faults in this regard, presumably holding it as a more authoritative reference less vulnerable to vandalism.&amp;quot;'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brent_Bozell accessed April 1, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rewriting its own history==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Associated Press and others credit Larry Sanger as the co-founder of Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/tech/2007/mar/25/032502465.html&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  But the Associated Press quotes Jimmy Wales as denying it:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;When you write this up please do not uncritically repeat Sanger's absurd claim to be the co-founder of Wikipedia.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I know of no one who was there at the company at the beginning who would think it anything other than laughable,&amp;quot; he added. This is an interesting comment, considering that Larry Sanger takes credit for coining the name, &amp;quot;Wikipedia.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_20#Sorry.2C_Jimbo.2C_but_not_buying_it. User talk:Jimbo Wales/Archive 20, Larry Sanger 03:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;I am not bent out of shape about it,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;quot;The facts are on my side, which is why I bother so little about it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the Associated Press, Jimmy Wales &amp;quot;has repeatedly tried to address this - even going so far as editing his own Wikipedia biography to tone down credit for Sanger. Such autobiographical contributions are frowned upon in Wikipedia's community, and Wales apologized after his changes were noticed and publicized by blogger Rogers Cadenhead in 2005.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''id.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wales' booking agent for speaking engagements claims that Wales is &amp;quot;the founder&amp;quot; of Wikipedia, which results in surprised clients when that claim is challenged. The false &amp;quot;founder&amp;quot; claim is on Wales' webpage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://jimmywales.com/about-jimmy/|title=About Jimmy|accessdate=February 6, 2015}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jimmy Wales has admitted that certain administrators, contrary to their own rules, have at times completely removed editing evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Seigenthaler scandal ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In early October 2005, a prominent and respected journalist [[John Seigenthaler Sr.]], contacted Wikipedia founder [[Jimmy Wales]] about false and libelous content in his biographical entry.  Essjay, a 24-year-old Wikipedia Administrator who was advancing rapidly in the organization, was dispatched to handle the situation.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;User:Essjay/Letter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=User:Essjay/Letter User:Essjay/Letter].  Retrieved from WikiTruth, November 3, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An anonymous contributor added to Seigenthaler's biography the previous May,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;John Seigenthaler Sr. was the assistant to Attorney General [[Robert Kennedy]] in the early 1960s. For a short time, he was thought to have been directly involved in the Kennedy assassinations of both [[John F. Kennedy|John]], and his brother, Bobby. Nothing was ever proven,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;John Seigenthaler moved to the [[Soviet Union]] in 1971, and returned to the [[United States]] in 1984. He started one of the country's largest public relations firms shortly thereafter.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales told Seigenthaler that Wikipedia is &amp;quot;accountable&amp;quot; and corrects mistakes immediately, but that the internet service provider of the anonymous user probably would not be helpful in identifying who placed the content.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Seigenthaler's Op-Eds&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.journalism.org/node/1673 Seigenthaler's Op-Eds], October 1, 2005.  Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org November 12, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Accountability activist [[Daniel Brandt]], a victim of a spurious biographical entry by Wikipedia Administrators, identified the place of employment of the anonymous user, and from there the person accountable was identified.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.journalism.cf.ac.uk/2006/online/index.php?id=parse-195-0-0-251&amp;amp;article=336&amp;amp;author=India+Camm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler returned to the editorial pages of ''USA Today'' from which he retired as its first editorial manager to write an Op-Ed piece critical of Wikipedia and the threat it poses to free speech due of its overt provocation of government regulation, its irresponsible self-regulation and lack of accountability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/2005-11-29-wikipedia-edit_x.htm A false Wikipedia 'biography'], By John Seigenthaler, ''USA Today'', 11/29/2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== CNN interview ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 5, 2005 Wales and Seigenthaler appeared on [[CNN]]. An exchange between CNN moderator [[Kyra Phillips]] and Wales went like this:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|PHILLIPS:...I ran my name. I was shocked to see what was under my name. ...I'm telling you right now, Jimmy, that's not how I want people to see me and understand me. And what I'm about, and what I write about in my interviews, ''et cetera''. So, you know, it's not just individuals like John, but me and many other people, that just have concerns that this is creating gossip that can be very harmful. And people go to these sites thinking that this is the truth.}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|WALES: Well, I mean, I think the real key is that the site matures over time, the -- all of the articles are edited over and over and over, and improved. Anyone's free to contribute. You're free to go and contribute.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This in fact is not the case.  Phillips was not free to remove objectionable content within her biographical entry, as Daniel Brandt at that exact moment was discovering.  Not four days prior, Wales told ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' magazine regarding Brandt's objections to a false Wikipedia biography created by Wikipedia Administrators about him, &amp;quot;I find it hard to take him very seriously at all,&amp;quot; and libelous slanders remained in Brandt's biography for a year and half. Wales told CNN, &amp;quot;we are very, very responsive to complaints and concerns.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler told the audience &amp;quot;with accountability comes credibility&amp;quot; and expressed fear that, &amp;quot;I'm afraid we're going to get regulated media as a result.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0512/05/lol.02.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 9, Seigenthaler appeared on C-SPAN's ''Washington Journal'' with Brian Lamb and articulated his concern that members of Congress or other powerful figures in government may likewise be targeted.  On November 2, 2006, days before the mid-term Congressional elections, an anonymous IP address traced to the ''[[New York Times]]'' changed [[U.S. House of Representatives]] [[Majority Leader]] [[Tom DeLay]]'s Wikipedia biographical entry from &amp;quot;a prominent member of the [[Republican Party]]&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;Grand Dragon of the Republican Party.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tom_DeLay&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=85320018 Wikipedia/Tom DeLay, Revision as of 20:19, 2 November 2006, IP 199.181.174.146]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/name2ip.php?orgname=New+York+Times&amp;amp;location= WikiScanner]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seigenthaler wrote a more expansive column in the ''The Tennessean'' after the November 30 ''USA Today'' piece appeared, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|a sudden stream of invective — homophobic, anti-Semitic and racist — spilled, as if from a sewer, onto the Wikipedia page under my name. ..It identified me as ...a &amp;quot;Nazi,&amp;quot; &amp;quot;fascist-oriented&amp;quot; ....murderer ...there also was the profile picture of Adolf Hitler over the caption, &amp;quot;Press photo of Seigenthaler.&amp;quot; The accompanying line: &amp;quot;He is secretly responsible for killing all the Jews.&amp;quot; }}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accountability and Section 230 ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Wikifascists.JPG|thumb|275px|right|From Wikipedia Watch. [http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/] The inscription reads,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; ''&amp;quot;Two wikifascists find someone without a biography.&amp;quot;'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Upon his retirement from ''USA Today'', Seigenthaler founded the First Amendment Center, an organization dedicated to a national dialogue about [[First Amendment]] rights and values. Seigenthaler criticized passage of [[Section 230]] of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Section 230 states that &amp;quot;no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker.&amp;quot; Unlike print and broadcast companies, internet service providers (ISP's) cannot be sued for disseminating defamatory attacks on citizens posted by others. Seigenthaler noted [[Jimbo Wales]] told [[Brian Lamb]] in a  [[C-SPAN]] interview that Wikipedia is accountable and that mistakes are corrected within minutes, but the false information remained in Seigenthaler's biography for five months. Seigenthaler concluded, &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|And so we live in a universe of new media with phenomenal opportunities for worldwide communications and research — but populated by volunteer vandals with poison-pen intellects.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A false Wikipedia 'biography', By John Seigenthaler, ''USA Today'', 11/29/2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the case of ''Zeran v. AOL'', Zeran sued AOL for refusing to screen and remove defamatory messages, even after Zeran notified the ISP of their existence. The lower court ruled for the service provider and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld the decision, noting that the intent of Section 230 was to (1) remove incentives on service providers to restrict speech on the Internet and (2) encourage self-regulation by service providers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=916529&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adl.org/Civil_Rights/newcyber.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An American citizen who posts material on the Internet that is illegal in a foreign country could be prosecuted if he subjected himself to the jurisdiction of that country. Internet users who export material that is illegal, that is to say, post material that is accessible and illegal in some foreign countries may be subject to prosecution in that country. However, under American law, the United States will not extradite a person for engaging in a constitutionally protected activity even if that activity violates a criminal law elsewhere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.rjayco.com/obrien/nazism.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Essjay given oversight ===&lt;br /&gt;
:''See Main article: [[Wikipedia:The Essjay scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Essjay wrote a professor to persuade her to allow her students to use Wikipedia as a viable source of information and posted a verbatim copy of the email for others to use.  Essjay stated, &amp;quot;I was the administrator who deleted the inappropriate revisions when Mr. Seigenthaler contacted our founder, [[Jimmy Wales]]; it is quite unfortunate that a relatively minor issue on a relatively minor figure has provided so much negative publicity.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;User:Essjay/Letter&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Seigenthaler noted in his Op-Ed piece, &amp;quot;The motive for the salacious stuff directed at me is reasonably obvious,&amp;quot; and quoted some comments, &amp;quot;We all at Wikipedia think he (Seigenthaler) is a horrible, stupid p...k for complaining about small inaccuracies in his biography.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Seigenthaler's Op-Eds&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Others said, &amp;quot;Mr. Seigenthaler's attitude and actions are reprehensible and ill-formed,&amp;quot; and “if there is an error whether large or small, he can correct it.”  This again, was not true.  Even prior to the Wikipedia policy, '''Biographies of Living Persons''', [[conflict of interest]] restrictions existed on the subject of an article editing their own entry. Another wrote: &amp;quot;Rather than fixing the article himself, he made a legal threat.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/02/12/bias_sabotage_haunt_wikipedias_free_world/?page=3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Seigraph.gif|400px|thumb|right|The Seigenthaler scandal was viewed as &amp;quot;the best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia&amp;quot; as curiosity seekers to view the [[misinformation]] skyrocketed Alexa rankings.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the damage to an innocent person and divulgence of Wikipedia's precarious claim as a viable source, the Seigenthaler scandal was viewed as a triumph and considered &amp;quot;the best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Seigenthaler,_Sr.#The_best_thing_that_ever_happened_to_Wikipedia Talk:John Seigenthaler Sr.#The best thing that ever happened to Wikipedia], retrieved 23 March 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; catapulting it into a top ten most visited website as curiosity seekers responded to the negative publicity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://wikipediareview.com/lofiversion/index.php?t1100.html Wikipedia: A Nightmare Of Libel and Slander], Joel Leyden, Israel News Agency, 8 May 2006.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scandal was originally billed as a &amp;quot;hoax&amp;quot;, then &amp;quot;controversy,&amp;quot; then downgraded to &amp;quot;incident,&amp;quot; and now re-upgraded to &amp;quot;controversy,&amp;quot; evidently in response to criticism.  The Wikipedia entry on &amp;quot;Seigenthaler controversy&amp;quot; contains [[disinformation]], making the claim, &amp;quot;After the incident, Wikipedia took steps to prevent a recurrence, including barring unregistered users from creating new pages.&amp;quot;  No actions were ever taken to require disclosure of the real life identities of contributors.  Barring unregistered users from creating new pages had nothing to do with the Seigenthaler scandal—the page already existed when an anonymous IP added the false information.  Registration of accounts requires no accountability of the real life identity of the contributor.  Indeed, many experienced Wikipedia editors and Administrators have dozens of registered accounts, called &amp;quot;sockpuppet accounts.&amp;quot;  Protecting the identities of anonymous high-level Administrators has always been more of a priority to the WikiMedia Foundation than the propagation of false information about real life persons whose identities are known.  Wales was asked by ''BusinessWeek'' magazine, “Why do you feel it is important to allow contributors and site administrators to remain anonymous?” Wales responded, “there are definitely people working in Wikipedia who may have privacy reasons for not wanting their name on the site….there are lots of reasons for privacy online that aren’t nefarious.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2005/tc20051214_441708.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In the Seigenthaler case, it was the odd circumstance that a victim of false information had a large enough platform to respond, coupled with the welcome fact that the victim fundamentally opposes government regulation of internet speech.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's &amp;quot;Seigenthaler controversy&amp;quot; also states, &amp;quot;The Foundation added a new level of &amp;quot;oversight&amp;quot; features to the MediaWiki software,[12] accessible as of 2006 to around 20 experienced editors nominated by Wales,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler_Sr._Wikipedia_biography_controversy#Wikimedia_Foundation_reaction Seigenthaler controversy#Wikimedia Foundation reaction].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; one of whom was Essjay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ban on anonymous page creation “reform” was abandoned less than two years later as Wikipedia's usage and ratings slumped in the wake of yet more scandals and questions about Wikipedia's culture, core content policies, and endemic lack of accountability.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/084292.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Brandt / Berlet feud==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See Main article: [[Wikipedia:The Daniel Brandt controversy]]&lt;br /&gt;
An ugly [[far-left]] sectarian dispute&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://spencer.lib.ku.edu/exhibits/wilcox/5.html Laird Wilcox], ''The Watchdogs: A Close Look at Anti-Racist &amp;quot;Watchdog&amp;quot; Groups'', Second Edition, Part 2, Editorial Research Service, 1999, p. 21. ISBN 0-993592-96-5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; reared its head in 2005 with disastrous consequences for the site's credibility. The feud had been dormant for many years until the need to elevate a “controversial and notable expert” above the level of “partisan and extreme” defined by its own policies became apparent which would have precluded the so-called “expert” as &amp;quot;a source for anything other than himself,” as Wikipedia's ever fluid policies dictate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Daniel Brandt, founder of Namebase,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.namebase.org/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Google Watch, and Wikipedia Watch, removed Chip Berlet from his Board of Advisors in 1991 when Berlet refused to sit on the same Board which included Fletcher Prouty.&amp;quot;  Prouty, a retired Air Force colonel whose intelligence career stretched back to accompanying President [[Franklin Roosevelt]] to the [[Teheran conference]], was allegorically portrayed as the mysterious “Man X”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/lfprouty.htm Leroy Fletcher Prouty, Jr., Colonel, United States Air Force], [[Arlington National Cemetery]] Website, Retrieved November 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by Donald Southerland in  [[Oliver Stone]]'s film, [[JFK]]. A Brandt biographical page was created using Berlet as the source for unsavory attacks on Brandt.  Brandt describes himself as an &amp;quot;accountability activist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/04/your_take_roundupbelievers_neg.html Believers, Negativists Debate Wikipedia’s Trustworthiness], by Mark Glaser, 20 April 2006. Retrieved from pbs.org October 29, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Daniel_Brandt Wikiquote/Daniel Brandt#Sourced]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and claims he originally began working with Wikipedia editors in good faith during October 2005 but any biographical information he revealed was spun against him to depict him in a negative light.  Brandt states,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I soon realized that it was also about Berlet, who was still bent on undermining me. Berlet was using Wikipedia as part of his political agenda, and he was successful in this.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=5641&amp;amp;st=40&amp;amp;p=21441&amp;amp;mode=linear#entry21441&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Berlet's biography underwent an extensive revision with most of the substantive NPOV criticism cut out.  The revising editor commented, &amp;quot;I kept Daniel Brandt, not because I feel he's a credible source, but because there's so little published criticism of Berlet, that I felt I had to retain something.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=9161554 Chip Berlet/Talk, SlimVirgin 00:19, 7 January 2005].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This is an extraordinary statement and raises the question why the same high-level Administrator and author of several of Wikipedia's core content and citation policies, including '''Wikipedia:Reliable Sources''' and '''Wikipedia:Biographies of Living Persons''' ('''BLP'''),&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;en.wikipedia.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons&amp;amp;diff=31947681&amp;amp;oldid=31753956&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; would use a source she did not consider credible. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies of living persons===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia:Biographies of Living Persons (WP:BLP) policy did not come into being because of the Seigenthaler scandal, but rather over the Brandt controversy, as the originating editor noted in an edit summary.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;en.wikipedia.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Brandt requested Wikipedia delete his biographical entry, and ceased working with editors he suspected of working to further the propagation of false information about him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' magazine bills itself as the nation's oldest trade journal serving the newspaper industry with roots dating back to 1884.  Wikipedia founder [[Jimmy Wales]] responded to questions from ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'' in a prepared statement on December 1, 2005 about Daniel Brandt saying,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I don't regard him as a valid source about anything at all&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/article_brief/eandp/1/1001612839 Wikipedia Founder, Readers Respond to Seigenthaler Article], Jay DeFoore, ''Editor &amp;amp; Publisher'', December 01, 2005.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales comments added '''undue weight'''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:UNDUE#Undue_weight&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ('''WP:UNDUE''') to criticism of Brandt when placed within his biographical entry. Brandt demanded accountability from the army of unidentified Wikipedia Administrators furthering Chip Berlet's agenda to destroy Brandt's credibility, and elevate Berlet's own as a Wikipedia &amp;quot;expert.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:294577483 90fd22f5cd m.jpg|thumb|300px|right|From '''WikiTruth''', the inscription reads,&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;''The Big Bad Brandt is Gonna Getcha!'']]&lt;br /&gt;
Brandt became known as the scourge of the Wikipedia Admin community.  WikiTruth says in its ''Brandt the Boogeyman'' entry,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|he dates back to a time when people would look up facts in books and would verify information without just doing a copy and paste from an AP news article and thinking they were done. He compares writing styles, he calls government agencies, and he writes letters. And when he's done, he tends to know. Or at least, he knows where he stands in terms of information. He's rather tenacious about getting stuff right. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia, of course, doesn't do this much at all: depending on the day, they'll laud a link to a website as being absolutely useless (it's on the WEB, of course) and then the next minute link to a different website to back a &amp;quot;fact&amp;quot; up. Citing books and printed materials is often a no-go, because nobody can read the original citation, so it gets swept away as well. Really, you have no idea what's good and what's bad, and it's all one big happy soup-hug. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore, guys like Daniel Brandt are horrible for Wikipedia: he researches. He finds laws that pertain to situations. He asks the tough questions that could upset the whole Wiki-cart.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia continues to publish inaccurate and defamatory articles about living persons, written by anonymous contributors, based on other unreliable sources, and refuses to withdraw or change them. The victims of its libels have no legal means of compelling Wikipedia to make any changes. It is not answerable to any court or libel laws and simply behaves as if it is above the law.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Wordbomb Saga==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Patrick byrne overstock small.jpg|thumb|right|Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne [http://www.overstock.com/Patrick-Byrne-and-naked-short-selling/7371/static.html]]]&lt;br /&gt;
One of Wikipedia's most bitter and drawn-out disputes, chronicled in ''The Register,''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; centers around the assertion by representatives of Overstock.com&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.overstock.com/community&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that a [[Mainstream media|mainstream financial journalist]] Gary Weiss had been editing Wikipedia to impose his point of view on a series of articles relevant to the company. Weiss was once a reporter with BusinessWeek, in 2007 became a columnist with Forbes, and had for over 10 years been posting under fake names to confuse, distort, hijack Usenet groups, stock message boards, and Wikipedia, to prevent the public from understanding criminal activity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.deepcapture.com/gary-weiss-scaramouch-psychopath/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Weiss was notorious around the Internet for his public feud with Overstock&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://garyweiss.blogspot.com/2007/05/overstockcoms-ethical-dilemma.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and its CEO [[Patrick Byrne]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://allantyoung.com/2008/09/22/patrick-byrne-vindicated/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ridiculing their campaign against the controversial practice of [[Naked Short Selling]].   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2006, Judd Bagley, an ally of Overstock's Patrick Byrne having interviewed the CEO for a personal project, began editing Wikipedia to counter what was perceived to be a skewed representation of Naked Short Selling and Overstock.com. He was swiftly dispatched by influential Wikipedia administrators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Shortly after, Bagley became Overstock's Director of Communications, and embarked on an aggressive campaign to publicize the dispute on various websites, aiming to expose the administrators he held responsible for protecting Weiss. Using the moniker “Wordbomb”, Bagley presented evidence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://antisocialmedia.net/final-word-on-weiss/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; suggesting that not only was Gary Weiss editing Wikipedia using the name “User:Mantanmoreland“,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mantanmoreland&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but that he was operating other accounts to manipulate consensus and protect his interests in the dispute.  Mantanmoreland violated Wikipedia policies against Conflict of Interest and No Self Promotion by creating an article about himself.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gary_Weiss&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=48341962&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Bagley proved Weiss had edited Wikipedia from one of two main IPs used by the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC),&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.dtcc.com/about/business/index.php&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the organization charged with settling about a quadrillion stock trades each year. The DTCC is also the organization Overstock.com CEO Patrick Byrne said acts an enabler of perpetrators of illegal naked short selling of many public companies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=10360&amp;amp;st=0&amp;amp;p=36485&amp;amp;mode=linear#entry36485&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia responded to Bagley's campaign in typical schoolyard fashion. The dispute was escalated by a small clique of powerful Wikipedians who seemed less interested in the truth of Bagley's assertions, and more concerned with attacking perceived threats to the status quo at Wikipedia. With the approval of [[Jimbo Wales]], administrators sided with “Mantanmoreland” / Gary Weiss, and anointed Bagley / Wordbomb an “Enemy Of The Wiki” who needed to be silenced — a “stalker” and a “harasser” for publicizing the details of the person who had been editing relevant articles on Wikipedia, and the people who had been stopping him from doing the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For nearly two years, Bagley's name was invoked to inspire paranoia in the Wikipedia Admin Community to keep questioning editors in line. It became a textbook case for analysis of the intense group-think Wikipedia has become notorious for.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Judd bagley overstock.jpg|thumb|left|175px|Judd Bagley was made a target at the highest levels of Wikipedia and became a victim of a global [[witchhunt]] by the Wikipedia Admin Community for daring to expose an unholy alliance of abuse and [[corruption]] on [[Wall Street]] and in the Wikipedia cabal. [http://antisocialmedia.net/] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
Bagley was repeatedly disparaged&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=15897&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by a cabal of out-of-control administrators such as Guy Chapman, who denounced Bagley as “lunatic” and “evil” when it suited. UK Wikimedia representative David Gerard banned an entire area of Utah to prevent Bagley raising his issues and made personally disparaging remarks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:David_Gerard/archive_5#User:204.15.84.2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikipedia Arbitrator Fred Bauder claimed that Bagley's blog AntiSocialMedia.net showed “moral depravity”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision&amp;amp;diff=158954587&amp;amp;oldid=158809362&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for challenging the Wiki-elite. Administrator Phil Sandifer dismissed Bagley in highly personal and offensive language while boasting&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083509.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that he himself had become a “powerful and trusted administrator on the 9th biggest website in the world.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other editors who raised Overstock's quite legitimate complaints were banned as proxies of Judd Bagley. Paranoia had taken such a hold that editors with productive records from all over the US, and as far afield as Europe and Asia found themselves accused of being Bagley. When the editor Cla68&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Mantanmoreland/Evidence#Evidence_presented_by_Cla68&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; questioned the issue of Gary Weiss editing Wikipedia, he was swiftly blocked by administrator Durova on the orders of Jimbo Wales who wrote,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gary_Weiss&amp;amp;diff=165916446&amp;amp;oldid=165916313&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; “Durova and Guy have my full support here. No nonsense, zero tolerance, shoot on sight. No kidding, this has gone on long enough”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A study&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SirFozzie/Investigation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; undertaken by concerned administrators into the editing patterns of “Mantanmoreland” came to fruition. Despite the “Mantanmoreland” account ceasing edits on Overstock / Naked Short Selling articles in September 2007, the study revealed evidence beyond reasonable doubt that the same person had been operating several accounts to “control” articles. Thus affirming Bagley's claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More worryingly for good faith Wikipedians was the revelation&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikback.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&amp;amp;Number=2762#Post2757&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/10/01/wikipedia_and_naked_shorting/print.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Jimbo Wales, alongside leading administrators, had considered that this person was almost certainly Gary Weiss in a private discussion as long ago as September 2007 (the same month the “Mantanmoreland” account quit editing the relevant articles). Meaning that behind the scenes, they were admitting that Bagley was probably right all along, yet in public were vilifying or blocking anyone who publicly stated so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the [[financial meltdown of 2008]], the [[Securities and Exchange Commission]] issued directives aimed at curbing abusive naked short selling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.philly.com/inquirer/business/20090728_SEC_short-selling_rule_is_permanent.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Patrick Byrne has been widely recognized as in the forefront of the movement aimed at curbing such abuses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.investigatethesec.com/drupal-5.5/?q=node/425&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Michael Moore==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Moorecagan.JPG|right|thumb|200px|Moore with [[Leslie Cagan]] [[United For Peace and Justice]] [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=629] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
The website MichaelMoore.com, dissatisfied with a Wikipedia editor's edits to ''[[Sicko]]'', published an image of a Wikipedia user on its main page. This was combined with links to edit both ''Sicko'' and the editor's user page.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Proposed_decision#Michael_Moore]  Several Wikipedia editors and Administrators regarded this action on the part of [[Michael Moore]]'s official website as an egregious violation of a well publicized ruling to protect Wikipedia editors from outside harassment. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites/Evidence#Michael_Moore_2] The consensus, per Wikipedia's policy was to remove links from Wikipedia to Michael Moore's attack site which was urging vengeance and reprisals against an editor who posted criticism of Moore's film.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Arbitration, Wikipedia's internal policy making and dispute resolution arm, the Arbitration chairman publicly admitted,&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|No question it contained an attack, including a link to edit our user's page. The problem is that many of us like Michael Moore very much and don't care much for the viewpoint of the user involved. Applying our policy in a rote manner (Without consideration of '''the unwritten rule that we support prominent subjects that we like''') yields removal of the link (At least while it contained the personal attack).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wikien-1 [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082980.html Harassment sites], Fred Bauder, Sun Oct 14 19:03:28 UTC 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View (NPOV), laid down by founder Jimbo Wales allegedly is &amp;quot;absolute and non-negotiable.&amp;quot; Few people find the claim convincing.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view][https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#_note-0] The ArbCom chairman further stated, &amp;quot;Obviously we need to make an exception for prominent people whose viewpoint we support.&amp;quot; [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082987.html] When asked, &amp;quot;How, then, is this remotely compatible with NPOV?&amp;quot;, the ArbCom chairman responded, &amp;quot;Not at all.&amp;quot; [http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/082993.html] The editor whom Michaelmoore.com was urging its viewers to attack and harass is described as &amp;quot;a Fellow at the [[American Enterprise Institute]], a [[conservative]] [[think tank]].&amp;quot;[http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2007-October/083230.html]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Sinbad hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
On March 16, 2007, Wikipedia entry on the 50-year old entertainer Sinbad, born David Adkins, stated: &amp;quot;He succumbed to a fatal heart attack on the morning of March 14, 2007.&amp;quot;  This hoax was widely reported in the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ioltechnology.co.za/article_page.php?iSectionId=2891&amp;amp;iArticleId=3734818&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Robert Clark Young revenge edits==&lt;br /&gt;
From 2006 to 2013, Robert Clark Young, an author who had only published one novel to mixed reviews, edited Wikipedia extensively with 13,000 edits under username &amp;quot;Qworty.&amp;quot;  He engaged in aggressive behavior making revenge edits to biographical articles of his rival authors and other people against whom he held grudges. He also puffed up his own Wikipedia autobiography, and repeatedly denied that he was connected to Young.  He also created other single purpose accounts to further his campaign.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Geri_Litton|title=Geri Litton sockpuppet investigation|date=2007|accessdate=July 11, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Qworty/Archive|title=Quorty sockpuppet inviestigant|date=2013|accessdate=July 11, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Only after his true identity was revealed in a salon.com article,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/|title=Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia|date=May 17, 2013|work=salon.com|accessdate=July 9, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was Young banned&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive797#User:Qworty|title=Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive797|accessdate=July 9, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and efforts made to reverse his vindictive edits.  In essence, he would remove favorable items from the biographies of his enemies or nominate them for deletion. The salon.com article concluded,&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;But Qworty’s example tells us that even when people call attention to a rogue editor, even when that editor’s temper tantrums come to the attention of the founder of Wikipedia, it’s quite possible that no action will be taken.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Rutgers-Ivy League hoax==&lt;br /&gt;
A Wikipedia entry falsely stated that Rutgers was once invited to join the Ivy League.  Although that false statement was eventually removed from Wikipedia, it was not removed before the ''Daily News'' relied on it in this story:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:You don't have to define your college with your football team, but Rutgers long ago decided to give it a try. Back in 1954, when it was considered a 'public Ivy,' Rutgers might have joined the fledgling Ivy League and altered its destiny. But the school declined the offer - arguably the dumbest mistake in its history. Ever since then, Rutgers has scrambled to prove itself worthy of playing football with the big boys.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bondy, Filip. &amp;quot;They Can Finally Say They Belong Here&amp;quot;, New York Daily News, 2006-11-10, p. 92. Retrieved on 2006-12-13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Barbara Bauer vs. Wikimedia Foundation==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikimedia Foundation is one of 17 defendants in a lawsuit suit filed in New Jersey, by Barbara Bauer and her literary agency.  Her Wikipedia article was deleted on March 25, 2007 by Wikipedia administrator Doc Glasgow as a &amp;quot;bloody disgrace&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wikipedia-watch.org&amp;quot;&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauertc.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{dead link}}&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;wikipedia-watch.org&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauert1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/bauert2.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{dead link}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==GFDL License Issue==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia's practice of complete deletion of articles&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&amp;amp;page=Brian+Peppers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; without reference to the original article, the author(s)/publisher(s) of the article, and the history and title(s) of the article, including modification history, description and appropriate dates, is a direct violation of at least GFDL version 1.2.  Additionally, the GFDL License states that if the article/document contains Copyright notices, that said notices must be preserved at all times. If those notices are removed, then they are in violation of Copyright Law, as well as the terms of the GFDL license.  Furthermore, the question of them removing anything outright at all comes into quite a grey area. If one reads the GFDL License literally, then it implies that once the article document is posted, it is in distribution, and technical measures are not allowed to be taken to prevent the use of the document in question, and that no other conditions whatsoever can be added by the user to those of the GFDL license.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Wikipocalypse:GF'DL&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html#TOC1&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, beginning June 15, 2009, the Wikimedia Foundation began transitioning content on Wikipedia to be dual-licensed under both the GFDL and Creative Commons CC-BY-SA 3.0.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-06-15/News_and_notes&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Censorship==&lt;br /&gt;
Among the many userboxes that are used by editors in Wikipedia, there is one that claims &amp;quot;Wikipedia is not censored&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Disavian/Userboxes/Not_Censored &amp;quot;Wikipedia is not censored&amp;quot; userbox] at Wikipedia&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This is a lie, as Wikipedia routinely engages in censorship against any edits [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia|its editors and administrators do not like for political/ideological reasons]] (particularly involving political articles, the &amp;quot;[[global warming]]&amp;quot; article, the [[GamerGate]] controversy article and articles involving gender-confused individuals and those claiming to be &amp;quot;non-binary&amp;quot;) and its leftist editors/administrators have been very quick to revert/censor such edits and to quickly block editors who make such edits to fit reality instead of the leftist editors' personal and ideological preference, wishful thinking and political correctness in defiance of reality and logic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Cyberbullying==&lt;br /&gt;
The press have reported on incidents of [[cyberbullying]] on Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news| url=http://articles.latimes.com/2008/apr/29/local/me-wikipedia29 | work=Los Angeles Times | first=Molly | last=Hennessy-Fiske | title=Wikipedia threats went unchecked – Los Angeles Times | date=29 April 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ABCLocal&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local&amp;amp;id=6087243 Hacienda Heights school receives possible threat | abc7.com&amp;lt;!-- Bot generated title --&amp;gt;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite news |title=Student arrested for violent threats on Wikipedia |first= |last= |url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2008/04/wiki.html?cid=6a00d8341c630a53ef011571abd811970b |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=29 April 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An editor threatened an Asian student at the Glen A. Wilson High School in 2008,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ABCLocal&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LATimes2&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; and a 14-year-old boy was arrested for making a threat against Niles West High School on Wikipedia in 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.pantagraph.com/news/article_baef01f3-e56f-52e1-b9af-e90eb83e811b.html|title=Teen charged after threat to school on Wikipedia|date=31 October 2006|agency=Associated Press  |publisher=Pantagraph.com|accessdate=26 January 2011|location=Bloomington, IL}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
María Sefidari, the female Chair of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Directors, is involved in a lesbian relationship with Wikipedia editor Laura Hale, which creates an inherent conflict of interest in the following controversy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.canberra.edu.au/researchrepository/items/d2d1d08e-20c3-4781-9072-57c8960c6c91/1/introductory_pages.pdf?attachment.uuid=a046d5df-9395-4700-a345-ebda1f122cc6|title=Thesis Acknowledgements|page=4|accessdate=July 15, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Ms. Hale has a long history, dating back to 2011 of incompetent edits and abusing male editors while making false accusations of &amp;quot;misogyny&amp;quot; against editors who correct her edits.  A long-time male administrator, Fram, followed Ms. Hale around making corrections to her problematic edits.  In turn, Ms. Hale complained to the Trust &amp;amp; Security staff of the Wikimedia Foundation, rather than to the volunteer-staffed complaint mechanisms on Wikipedia.  Although the Trust &amp;amp; Security staff has previously banned a few editors for problems involving illegal conduct such as pedophilia, in June 2019, for the first time, they suspended Fram for one year for alleged &amp;quot;incivility&amp;quot;.  In response, an English Wikipedia administrator lifted the block and was in turn stripped of his administratorship by the Foundation, and several other administrators resigned in protest.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_response_to_the_Wikimedia_Foundation%27s_ban_of_Fram|title=Wikipedia:Community response to the Wikimedia Foundation's ban of Fram|accessdate=June 24, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In response to a Buzzfeed article about the controversy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/josephbernstein/wikipedia-ban-editor-culture-war|title=The Culture War Has Finally Come For Wikipedia|date=July 27, 2019|accessdate=July 28, 2019|work=Buzzfeed News}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikimedia Foundation executive director Katharine Maher sent a tweet calling the article &amp;quot;s***ty&amp;quot;, which drew heavy criticism against her on her Twitter account from other Wikipedia editors for what they indicated was her dismissive and elitist attitude toward those opposed to the Foundation's unilateral abuse of power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://twitter.com/krmaher/status/1144394019893460993|title=tweet|accessdate=June 28, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As more Wikipedia Administrators and Bureaucrats resign or go on strike, the crisis has also been reported by Breitbart.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2019/06/28/wikipedia-editors-revolt-over-sites-ban-of-veteran-administrator/|title=Wikipedia Editors Revolt over Site’s Ban of Veteran Administrator|date=July 28, 2019|work=Breitbart|accessdate=July 28, 2019}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikipedia on bestiality ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Wikipedia on bestiality]] and [[Atheism and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As noted earlier, the Wikipedia project was initiated by [[atheism|atheists]] and [[entrepreneur]] Jimmy Wales and the [[agnosticism|agnostic]] [[philosophy]] [[professor]] [[Larry Sanger]] on January 15, 2001.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.nndb.com/lists/288/000092012/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Bestiality]] is the act of engaging in sexual relations with an animal. As of July 18, 2012, Wikipedia's article on [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia zoophilia/bestiality] has an entire section on &amp;quot;arguments for zoophilia&amp;quot; plus pictures depicting zoophilia as well as a section on &amp;quot;arguments against zoophilia&amp;quot;. As of September 24, 2011, Wikipedia has a &amp;quot;[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_the_law Zoophilia and the law&amp;quot;] article which has a section on the impact of zoophilia laws where eight alleged negative impacts of zoophilia laws are given, but no positive impacts of the laws are given.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia_and_the_law#Impact_of_laws|title=Impact of laws section of &amp;quot;Zoophilia and the law&amp;quot;|date=July 17, 2012|accessdate=July 18, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Atheism and bestiality]] and [[Evolutionary belief and bestiality]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Trademarks and domain names ==&lt;br /&gt;
The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) uses the licensing of its trademarks as a tool to control local chapters.  Although each local chapter is in theory an autonomous organization, each chapter signs a contract with the WMF as a condition for using its trademarks.  The WMF also tried to stake out control over many domain names that contain the word &amp;quot;wiki&amp;quot; including &amp;quot;[[wikileaks]]&amp;quot;.  WikiLeaks and Wikipedia have no affiliation with each other. (&amp;quot;Wiki&amp;quot; describes a type of website and is not a trademark.)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiLeaks_is_not_part_of_Wikipedia |title=Wikipedia:WikiLeaks is not part of Wikipedia |work=Wikipedia |publisher=[[Wikimedia Foundation]] |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/online/wiki-giants-on-a-collision-course-over-shared-name-2065561.html |title=Wiki giants on a collision course over shared name |last1=Rawlinson |first1=Kevin |first2=Tom |last2=Peck |date=30 August 2010 |work=The Independent |location=London |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikia did purchase several WikiLeaks-related domain names (including wikileaks.com and wikileaks.net) as a &amp;quot;protective brand measure&amp;quot; in 2007.&amp;lt;ref name=wikia&amp;gt;{{cite web |url=http://www.wikia.com/Press:Wikia_Does_Not_Own_Wikileaks_Domain_Names |title=Press:Wikia Does Not Own Wikileaks Domain Names |work=[[Wikia]] |publisher=[[Wikia]] |accessdate=September 17, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Wikia started to transfer those domain names to WikiLeaks on June 14, 2007, but the transfer was never completed, and Wikia held those domain names when the &amp;quot;Wikileaks scandal&amp;quot; broke.&amp;lt;ref name=wikia/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Humorous quotes concerning Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;...dealing with the Wikipedians is like walking into a mental hospital: the floors are carpeted, the walls are nicely padded, but you know there’s a pretty good chance at any given moment one of the inmates will pick up a knife.” - quote from a ''[[New York Times]]'' article on Wikipedia written by the journalist and author Judith Newman&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/fashion/Wikipedia-Judith-Newman.html?smid=pl-share Wikipedia-Mania: Wikipedia, What Does Judith Newman Have to Do to Get a Page?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An article entitled ''Wikipedia Gridlocked by Wikipedia Nerds'' declared:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|So who are these Gatekeepers to all the internet's knowledge?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A survey the foundation conducted last year determined that the average age of an editor is 26.8 years, and that 87% of them are men.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As you suspected: [[nerd]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://gawker.com/5410917/wikipedia-gridlocked-by-wikipedia-nerds&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Jimmy Wales said the typical profile of a Wikipedia contributor is &amp;quot;a 26-year-old geeky male&amp;quot; who moves on to other ventures, gets married, and leaves the website.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/digital-living/5397593/Wikipedia-losing-contributors-founder-says Wikipedia losing contributors, founder says]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seth Meyers noted on his ''Late Night'' program, &amp;quot;Wikipedia is now accepting donations using the online currency Bitcoin. So now you can support information you're not sure is true with currency you're not sure is money.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.thespec.com/living-story/4733681-tuesdayfile/ Retrieved August 8, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When obscure author Patrick Modiano was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in October 2014, few journalists knew much about him.  The person updating his Wikipedia biography to reflect the prize added this warning to the article, &amp;quot;To the Reporter Now Copying From Wikipedia: Be careful boy. Primary sources are still best for journos.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2014/10/09/nobel_prize_winner_patrick_modiano_s_wikipedia_page_changed_to_add_note.html|title=A Reminder to Journalists Writing About the New Nobel Prize Winner, From Wikipedia|first=Forrest |last=Wickman|date=October 9, 2014|work=Slate|accessdate=October 10, 2014}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Patrick_Modiano&amp;amp;diff=prev&amp;amp;oldid=628920987&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Unbiased editor recruitment==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia claims that anyone can edit it.  That is true to an extent,but its editor pool is self-selecting.  However, on  January 25–29, 2012, the Wikimedia Foundation paid for Gregory Varnum and others to attend and staff a booth at the &amp;quot;24th National Conference on LGBT Equality: Creating Change&amp;quot; conference in Baltimore, Maryland.  The purpose of the Wikimedia booth was to recruit more LGBT activists to edit Wikipedia.  Although Wikimedia has outreach efforts at other conferences, there has been no outreach at conservative events.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia editor [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SarahStierch Sarah Stierch] was the volunteer moderator of the Gender Gap email list where she departed from discussing Wikipedia to freely share her negative experiences with men in her life.  In fall 2011, she was hired by the WMF as a Community Fellow to work on creating a &amp;quot;Teahouse&amp;quot; for newer Wikipedia editors. The report on the Teahouse Pilot Project&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Research:Teahouse/Pilot_Report&amp;amp;oldid=3832292|title=Teahouse: Pilot Report|date=June 14, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; explained, &amp;quot;If you click through to the Teahouse, it’s clearly aiming to broaden female participation - just look at the pastel background and references to tea.&amp;quot; Stierch tried to use Twitter to recruit more female editors into Teahouse and the English Wikipedia. The report concluded, &amp;quot;Because so much time and energy needed to be spend during the pilot on setting up and maintaining the space, we weren't able to focus as much as we'd have liked on gender-targeted strategies for recruiting female guests and hosts. There are clearly more experiments that need to be run in order to better integrate the space with other gender gap efforts and WikiWomen's calls to actions.&amp;quot;  The WMF terminated Stierch on January 9, 2014 following complaints of her moonlighting as a paid editor.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2014-January/129466.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On August 18, 2014, during the Congressional summer recess, the [[Cato Institute]] and Wikimedia DC jointly conducted a seminar to encourage Congressional staff members to edit Wikipedia about pending legislation and policy issues.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/08/18/a-call-to-edit-congress-and-wikipedia-told-to-peacefully-co-exist/|title=A call to edit: Congress and Wikipedia told to peacefully co-exist|first=Nancy|last=Scola|date=August 18, 2014|accessdate=August 22, 2014|work=Washington Post}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.c-span.org/video/?321030-1/discussion-wikipedia-government-transparency|date=August 18, 2014|accessdate=August 22, 2014|title=Wikipedia and Congress|work=C-SPAN}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The panel discussion included Michelle Newby, a full-time Cato employee who edits Wikipedia as a part of her job.  She promised to work with any Congressional Staff that would be interested in editing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Flaws in governance structure==&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps Wikipedia's greatest structural problem is Jimmy Wales' inability to remove himself from the process. He calls himself a &amp;quot;God-King&amp;quot; and rules the site with the style of [[monarchy]], robbing it of its potential to achieve some form of [[Jeffersonian]] [[democracy]] and accountability. Wales once speculated that all significant productivity emerged from his circle of a few hundred personal friends while the rest of the world groped along doing only spelling and punctuation mark corrections and other trivial modifications. The computer programmer and activist Aaron Swartz did a proper analysis and showed that the productivity was the results of many, many thousands of anonymous users. Swartz later committed [[suicide]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Wales delegated the run-of-the-mill decision-marking to a hand-picked group he called the Arbitration Committee. They take months to make any decisions and dole out multi-month to multi-year or permanent intervention solutions. A reputable encyclopedia usually simply chooses an Editor-in-Chief, i.e. one reputable, mature and experienced person with one mind to make high-quality decisions rapidly and perhaps dispense moderate penalties when needed. Sanger served as such, but Wales, an [[Objectivist]] economics major and former stock options trader, opted to drastically reduce his salary when it became clear that the project would be a success, thus forcing him out. Wales has since been making a living, in part, by promoting his notions of governance of Internet-based projects, often emphasizing that users should remain anonymous and thus without any serious form of credential or reputation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The problems are in the structure and in the personality flaws of Wales himself. Wales takes advantage of this vast pool of free labor to hunt his perceived enemies, somewhat in the style of [[L. Ron Hubbard]] or other such supposed founders of movements.{{fact}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Equally important are the flawed steps that Wales took to separate the community of volunteer Wikipedia editors from the financial control of the enterprise.  The servers and software are owned by the [[Wikimedia Foundation]] (WMF), a non-profit organization that at first was set up as a membership organization, but quickly changed to a non-membership organization so that members would not have any legal say regarding the organization.  Although people who have made a required minimum number of edits per year can vote for members of the Arbitration Committee and for a minority of the WMF Board seats, at least one community-elected Board member was removed because he did not agree with the majority of the Board.  Of course, Wales is guaranteed a perpetual WMF Board seat as a co-founder.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Originally, revenue from fundraising banners in the United States went to the WMF, but banner revenue in foreign countries went to the chapters located in those countries.  In recent years, the WMF has consolidated all fundraising revenues, with national chapters being forced to apply for specific grants from the WMF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To further complicate the financial controls, the WMF established a separate endowment at the [[Tides Foundation]] which is controlled by that foundation in consultation with an advisory board. Instead of having a community-selected advisory board or the entire WMF Board serving as the advisory board, the Tides Foundation appointed a new group with Wales and large donors serving.  When the endowment reaches its fundraising target, the advisory board decides whether the funds should stay at the Tides Foundation, be transferred to the WMF, or used in some other way.  So, if Wales has a falling out with the WMF Board over the next ten years, he and his hand-picked advisory board could take the Wikipedia endowment somewhere else. The editing community has no say in the endowment—who manages it or how the income will be spent.&lt;br /&gt;
==Core Policies==&lt;br /&gt;
Wikipedia has three policies that it calls its core policies. These are Neutral Point of View, Verifiability, and No Original Research. Despite designating these three policies as &amp;quot;core&amp;quot;, Wikipedia barely even cares about them, especially with cases in regard to atheism. Wikipedia has reverted well-substantiated edits for disagreeing with atheism numerous times, gone several paragraphs on pro-atheism topics without citing a single source, banned Creation Ministries International employees for an indefinite amount of times despite said employees having not violated any written policy, and more.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/Wikipedia|Articles about '''Wikipedia''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:The Protocols of Ritual Defamation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Wikipedia prejudice and KAL 007]] (Wikipedia deletion material related to [[New World Order]] and [[Larry McDonald]], touching [[Korean Airlines Flight 007]])&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Deletionpedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Wikipedia and Citizendium]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/aug/21/conservatives-miss-wikipedias-threat/ SHEFFIELD: Conservatives miss Wikipedia's threat] by [[Washington Times]], August 21, 2008 &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/06/wikipedia_and_overstock/print.html Wikipedia black helicopters circle Utah's Traverse Mountain], By Cade Metz, ''The Register'', 6 December 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/06/15/wikipedia_can_damage_your_grades/ Avoid Wikipedia, warns Wikipedia chief - It can seriously damage your grades] by Andrew Orlowski, ''The Register'', June 15, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/10/18/wikipedia_quality_problem/ Wikipedia founder admits to serious quality problems] by Andrew Orlowski, ''The Register'', October 18, 2005&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia Who Writes Wikipedia?] by Aaron Swartz, 2006&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/07/05/wikipedias-seven-worst-moments/ Wikipedia’s Seven Worst Moments] by Charlie Nash, ''Breitbart News'', July 5, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://evolutionnews.org/2017/11/wikipedia-and-astroturf/ Wikipedia and “Astroturf”] Sarah Chaffee, Evolution News. November 30, 2017 (Journalist [[Sharyl Attkisson]]).&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://oedb.org/ilibrarian/top-7-alternatives-to-wikipedia/  Top 7 Alternatives to Wikipedia] Open Education Database. (Includes Conservapedia along with six other online encyclopedias, criticizes Wikipedia for inaccuracies and hypocrisy.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.wikipedia.org Wikipedia]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2013/01/2013-is-starting-off-to-be-bad-year-for.html Study shows that the world's biggest pro-evolution website is driving away newcomer editors! Also, video shows evolutionists at Wikipedia are clowns!]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.wikipediocracy.com Wikipediocracy]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia_controversies Wikipedia's List of Wikipedia controversies]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.mises.org/story/2704 Wikipedia: What Is It Good For?], By Dick Clark, 9/19/2007. Retrieved from The Ludwig von Mises Institute, http://www.mises.org/ November 5, 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MoVLl_ne2Y Wikipedias' Own Cofounder Lambastes the Site for Bias]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikis]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Encyclopedias]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikipedia|Wikipedia]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Wikimedia Foundation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=1733523</id>
		<title>Essay:Best New Conservative Words</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&amp;diff=1733523"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T23:09:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Tax-spend.jpg|thumb|300px|The &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; slogan stuck to [[Harry Hopkins]] like a well-fitted suit.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--[[File:Conservative words.jpg|thumb|300px|The growth in conservative words on an annual basis (red), compared with a geometric growth rate (Courtesy [[User:Jcw]])]]--&amp;gt;[[Conservative]] terms, expressing [[conservative insights]], originate at a faster rate and with higher quality than [[liberal]] terms do.  Conservative triumph over liberalism is thus inevitable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each year the [[English language]] develops about a thousand new words.  The [[King James Version]] of the [[Bible]] contains only about 8,000 different words;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8013859.stm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; many good words have developed since.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Powerful new conservative terms have grown at a [[geometric progression|geometric rate]], roughly doubling every century.  For each new conservative term originating in the 1600s,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The King James Version of the Bible was published in 1611, by then [[William Shakespeare]] had written nearly all his plays.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; there are two new terms originating in the 1700s, four new terms in the 1800s, and eight new terms in the 1900s, for a pattern of &amp;quot;1-2-4-8&amp;quot;.  This suggests that the future will be increasingly conservative.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Century&lt;br /&gt;
!# New Conservative Terms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1600s&lt;br /&gt;
|40&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1700s&lt;br /&gt;
|82&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|164&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|340&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|47 (preliminary)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conservative words and terms==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--{| align=lwft border=1 cellspacing=0 style=&amp;quot;border-width: 5px; border-color: #c0c0c0; background: #e0e0e0; margin: 2em;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;text-align: center; padding: 10px 40px 10px 40px;&amp;quot; | Newest Layer by century, 1600s-1900s&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; 0-0-0-0&lt;br /&gt;
|}--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{clear}}&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable sortable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!New Term&lt;br /&gt;
!Origin date&lt;br /&gt;
!Comments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|a.m.&lt;br /&gt;
|1762&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;a.m.&amp;quot; means &amp;quot;before noon&amp;quot; in [[Latin]] (ante meridiem); it became popular much as &amp;quot;[[A.D.]]&amp;quot; did.  Also, a morning [[work ethic]] is a conservative concept.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|abortuary&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|an abortion clinic, which in reality is a mortuary for unborn children&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[abstract nonsense]] &lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for unnecessarily abstract mathematics of doubtful rigor; [[liberal denial]] insists that this term, which describes something as &amp;quot;nonsense&amp;quot;, is somehow not negative!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[accountability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1794&lt;br /&gt;
|the willingness or obligation to be held responsible for one's actions - a fundamental conservative ideal, unlike liberals who believe that &amp;quot;society&amp;quot;, and not individuals, is responsible for their wrongdoing. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[accuracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives strive for accuracy, while many liberals are masters of [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Achilles' heel&lt;br /&gt;
|1864&lt;br /&gt;
|an inevitable weak point of vulnerability amid overall strength, highlighting the need for [[God]] even by the strongest&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|act of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From ''Pollard v. Shaaffer'', 1 U.S. 210, 213 (1 Dall. 210) (Pa. S.Ct. 1787): &amp;quot;In the case before the court, if the lessee had covenanted for himself and his assigns, to deliver up the tenements in good order and repair, notwithstanding they should be destroyed by act of God or of an Enemy, then this action would certainly lie, because of the special express words; but when there are no such words, but only generally to repair &amp;amp;c. would it be reasonable to construe these words so as to extend to the cases put?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster asserts a date of origin of 1635 in its online version [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/act%20of%20god], but 1859 in its 10th edition print version.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an extraordinary, unforeseeable event, such as a massive flood or earthquake; term was probably inspired as a reference to the [[Great Flood]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action-at-a-distance]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1693&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Newton]]'s acceptance of this concept—which became fundamental to [[electrostatics]] and [[quantum mechanics]] and has a basis in Christianity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See, e.g.'', [[Jesus]]'s cure of the centurion's slave.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;—was central to the development of his theory of gravity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-philosophy/#ActDis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Materialists]] censor this concept, while Einstein criticized it as &amp;quot;spooky&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1915&lt;br /&gt;
|this differentiates conservatives from inactive people (originally [[liberals]]); this term might have originated in connection with [[Prohibition]] and efforts to pass the [[Eighteenth Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[addictive]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|the intrinsic characteristic of certain things or activities to induce repetitious involvement, usually with a harmful effect on the participant, as in [[gambling]], or [[video games]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|administrative state&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The title of a book: &amp;quot;The Administrative State&amp;quot; by Dwight Waldo (1948).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
|originally used in a descriptive manner by admirers of it, the term is frequently used in a pejorative manner by conservatives due to the lack of accountability of an overbearing bureaucracy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|aerobics&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by the [[Christian]] Dr. Kenneth H. Cooper&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianadvice.net/famous_christians.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to describe his self-help program to improve health; he gave the title &amp;quot;Aerobics&amp;quot; to his ground-breaking book in 1968, and eventually it revolutionized attitudes toward exercise.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[agency capture]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The concept originated a bit earlier, but its first best articulation was when a federal court recognized that &amp;quot;agency capture&amp;quot; is &amp;quot;where the regulated become the regulators.&amp;quot;  ''Huron Valley Hospital, Inc. v. Pontiac'', 612 F. Supp. 654, 663 (E.D. Mich. 1985).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the misuse of Big Government (agencies) by Big Business to choke off free enterprise through regulations that impede competition&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|agitprop&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|propaganda designed to incite agitation, originally coined to describe communist propaganda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[alarmism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|needless warnings, as in the politically motivated claims of [[global warming]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|{{#ifexist: alcoholism | [[alcoholism]] | alcoholism }}&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive or addictive drinking of alcohol&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[algorithm]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1849&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient and consistent step-by-step methodology for achieving a goal, the opposite of [[liberal style]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|altar call&lt;br /&gt;
|1899&lt;br /&gt;
|an invitation by a preacher for people to come forward to the altar to signify their personal commitment to [[Christ]], and many do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[altruism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|selfless assistance of others; this also occurs in the animal kingdom, and is a [[counterexample to evolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ambulance chaser&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|a lawyer who searches for victims to persuade them to sue for his profit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American dream]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1911 is the date given by the &amp;quot;OED&amp;quot;, which refers to the Oxford English Dictionary. The Merriam-Webster dictionary gives a date of 1931.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the vision that, with hard work, anyone in American can attain happiness and prosperity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[American exceptionalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1835&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that the United States and the American people hold a special place in the world, by offering opportunity and hope for humanity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|American Way&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&lt;br /&gt;
|later conservative entrepreneurs used this to coin a new name for what became a highly successful and uniquely American business model: &amp;quot;Amway&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[anti-Christian]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing Christian ideals and institutions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|anticompetitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1854&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with open competition and the enormous benefits that flow from it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[antilife]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|term criticizing a tendency to oppose life and lifesaving care&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[antitrust]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&lt;br /&gt;
|the origin is the passage of the [[Republican]]-sponsored [[Sherman Act]] to prohibit restraints of trade, one of the greatest pieces of legislation in all of history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apathetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1744&lt;br /&gt;
|term critical of the those who are deliberately inactive and disengaged mentally&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apologetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|offered in support or defense, especially of Christianity (typically used today as the noun &amp;quot;apologetics&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|apology tour&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|the term is used to criticize someone who repeatedly apologizes for a country or institution that does a great deal of good; this term became popular to criticize the newly elected [[Barack Obama]] for going on a foreign tour to bash the [[United States]], which was misleading and broke a tradition of presidents not doing that.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Apostles' Creed]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1658&lt;br /&gt;
|a concise statement of [[Christian]] [[faith]] that began with the original [[Apostles]] and has guided billions since. (The earliest historical evidence of the creed's existence is in a letter written by the Council of Milan in 390 A.D.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.christianitytoday.com/biblestudies/articles/churchhomeleadership/080730.html Christianity Today]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[apparatchik]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|an official who blindly does what he thinks his government superiors want, as in [[communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[apple pie]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1780&lt;br /&gt;
|honesty, simplicity, wholesomeness. Relating to, or characterized by traditionally American values.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/apple%20pie Merriam-webster- Apple pie]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|arm-twisting&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|behind-the-scenes pressure tactics used in politics, primarily by [[liberals]], in order to compel people to vote and act in ways they would not do otherwise&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|assimilate&lt;br /&gt;
|1880s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;estimate only; this originated sometime in the late 1880s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the desired absorption of immigrant groups into the culture and mores of the resident population&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[atheistic]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1625-35&lt;br /&gt;
|An adjective pertaining to or characteristic of atheists or atheism; containing, suggesting, or disseminating atheism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|attention span&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|correlated with intelligence, the attention span is how long someone can concentrate on something.  It is rapidly shortening; the Lincoln-Douglas debates 150 years ago lasted for hours, but none do today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.help4teachers.com/ras.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The average length of sentences in speech is another indication of attention span, and it has been shortening significantly.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Austrian economics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A more precise date is welcome; &amp;quot;Austrian school&amp;quot; was coined a bit earlier, initially as a derisive term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to economics that emphasizes the purposeful decisions of individuals, and which was belatedly recognized by a 1974 [[Nobel Prize]] to [[Friedrich von Hayek]]; these economic ideas influenced [[Ludwig von Mises]], [[Ron Paul]], and 1987 Nobel Laureate James M. Buchanan.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|axiomatic&lt;br /&gt;
|1797&lt;br /&gt;
|self-evident (first usage), and later it developed the meaning of being based on a set of axioms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[baby boom]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/baby-boomer.html Baby boomer] phrases.org.uk, retrieved August 30, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in birthrate, which is a good thing; note that what is known as post-World War II baby boom actually started before the war, contrary to what textbooks teach. Perpetuating the mistake, the U.S. Census Bureau counts the generation born between 1946 and 1964 as the baby boomers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/cb06-ffse01-2.html Newsroom: Facts for Features - Special Edition - The Oldest Baby Boomers Turn 60!]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|back burner&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|inactive status away from attention, as in &amp;quot;RINOs try to put social issues on the back burner&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bag lady&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|a woman, typically unmarried, whose life tragically degenerated into a homeless existence of wandering in a city while carrying bags of worthless possessions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bailout]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|wasting taxpayer money to rescue, temporarily, a failing company&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bake sale&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.redstate.com/barrypopik/2011/03/27/origin-of-the-bake-sale-and-maddows-bakesales-for-bombersbakesales-or-billionaires/ Citizen Patriot of Jackson, Michigan, “Albion,” pg. 6, (Nov. 21, 1903)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the activity of volunteers, typically women, baking good food and selling it to raise money for a worthy cause&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|balkanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|to break a region or neighborhood into divisive components; the opposite of the American concept of assimilation or &amp;quot;[[E pluribus unum]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bargain hunter&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|a [[conservative]] trait that helps keep [[inflation]] low.  First usage in courts occurred when the Minnesota Supreme Court struck down a regulation and explained that the improper regulation was too broad and not limited to protection against schemes that deceive a &amp;quot;veteran bargain hunter.&amp;quot;  ''Kanne v. Segerstrom Piano Mfg. Co.'', 118 Minn. 483, 487, 137 N.W. 170, 171 (1912).     &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[baseball]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|an American original that is governed by rules rather than a clock; the stars and fans are overwhelmingly conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bedrock]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840-1850&lt;br /&gt;
|an American term for unbroken solid rock underneath fragments or soil, which adopted the figurative meaning of strong values:  &amp;quot;bedrock principles&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bedrock&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|beltway mentality&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Paul Weyrich]] though possibly first used by then-Governor [[John Sununu]] (&amp;quot;captives of yourselves&amp;quot;), it refers to a governing style that sees only as far as the highway that surrounds its capital, especially the one around D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|benchmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1842&lt;br /&gt;
|a quality standard for which people can strive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Best of the Public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|A term coined by [[Andy Schlafly]] to express the idea that one does not need [[liberal]] credentials that so-called &amp;quot;experts&amp;quot; have.  Indeed, many great historical figures would have failed the liberal &amp;quot;expert&amp;quot; test.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Bias|biased]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|to show prejudice for or against something; American society is rapidly becoming ''biased'' against Christian and Conservative beliefs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Bible Belt]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|southern regions of the [[United States]] where people read the [[Bible]] and attend church, rather than try to avoid both as in the [[liberal]] Northeast and West Coast&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Biblophobic&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.christianpost.com/news/pastor-greg-laurie-i-hate-the-word-homophobic-83209/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|hatred or fear of the [[Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bidenism&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|an idiotic remark that would subject the politician to enormous ridicule if he were a [[conservative]], but when spoken by [[liberal]] [[Joe Biden]] the media are just fine with it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Big Brother]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|government constantly watching its citizens; [[George Orwell]] first coined this term in his classic, ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Bilderbergers&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First coined by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] in ''A Choice Not an Echo'' (1964) as &amp;quot;DeBilderbergers&amp;quot; based on the Dutch origin of the name.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a secret political society that was first exposed in ''[[A Choice Not an Echo]]''; the society consists of elite [[globalists]] who have met annually  since 1954 to try to exert influence over the world&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|biological clock&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how each woman begins to lose her ability to have children at age 27, no matter how much [[feminists]] try to conceal this scientific fact from women&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Blame America Crowd&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Or &amp;quot;Blame-America-First Crowd&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|Michael Barone quoted [[Jeane Kirkpatrick]] as saying that the &amp;quot;San Francisco Democrats&amp;quot; (site of the Democratic National Convention in 1984) &amp;quot;always blame America first.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.creators.com/opinion/michael-barone/the-blame-america-first-crowd.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blank check&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|irresponsibly giving someone unlimited spending authority or power, as in &amp;quot;a Con Con would be a blank check to destroy the nation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blather&lt;br /&gt;
|1719&lt;br /&gt;
|nonsensical or insignificant babble, as in &amp;quot;liberal blather is common in the [[lamestream media]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|blue curtain&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|Michigan and Pennsylvania, which for nearly 30 years were &amp;quot;safe&amp;quot; Democratic states in presidential elections totaling a whopping 36 electoral college votes in 2016, but won by [[Donald Trump]] in a massive upset aided by their lack of [[early voting]] that is manipulated by [[Democrats]] in other states.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Blue Dog Democrat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who adheres to conservative principles within the Democratic party, once called a Boll Weevil; as of 2009 there are 45-50 Blue Dog Democrats in the [[House of Representatives]], which is enough to form a majority with [[Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bona fides&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Estimate for the emergence in popularity of this meaning of the term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|evidence or confirmation of someone's good faith or authenticity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boomerang&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|originally coined to describe a throwing device that returns to the thrower, the term became increasingly useful to describe how wrongful conduct returns to bite the perpetrator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|boondoggle&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;popularized during the [[New Deal]] as a contemptuous word for make-work projects for the unemployed.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=boondoggle&amp;amp;searchmode=none&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The term gained popularity in [[Canada]] following a corruption scandal tied to the [[Liberal]] government in 2000.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bootstrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|unaided effort, personal merit, hard work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bork&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[William Safire]] to refer to how Democrats savage a conservative nominee, such as their defeat of Supreme Court nominee [[Robert H. Bork]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|born-again&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|it takes an open mind and heart&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|borrowed time&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|a bit more time in life than one has earned, which is best spent by accepting the truth of the [[Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bottom line&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|the essential point, without the [[liberal claptrap]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The original usage of the term the &amp;quot;bottom line&amp;quot; had nothing to do with money.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainstorm&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|a burst of productive thought&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brainwashing&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from the Chinese term &amp;quot;xǐnǎo&amp;quot; soon after the [[communist]] takeover of China, &amp;quot;brainwashing&amp;quot; means forced abandonment of [[faith]] in favor of regimented [[atheism]]. In a more general sense, it refers to the manipulation and control of the human mind through torture and propaganda techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Brexit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|the slogan for the successful campaign in the [[United Kingdom]] to leave the [[EU]], it has since been copied to describe movements in additional countries to reject [[globalism]], such as &amp;quot;[[Frexit]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bright-line rule&lt;br /&gt;
|1971&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First used by [[U.S. Supreme Court]] Justice [[John Harlan II]] in ''United States v. Jorn'', 400 U.S. 470, 486 (1971), where he rejected adopting a bright-line rule for that case.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a clear, unwavering line dividing what is allowed from what is prohibited; increasingly favored to avoid confusion and requirements that arbitrarily change.  Championed by [[Supreme Court]] Justice [[Antonin Scalia]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bromide&lt;br /&gt;
|1836&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its figurative meaning probably dates from the late 1800s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|hackneyed, unoriginal statement lacking in substance, similar to [[liberal claptrap]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|brinkmanship&lt;br /&gt;
|1956&lt;br /&gt;
|the art of displaying a willingness to use military force in order to obtain a just resolution to a conflict between nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|bubble&lt;br /&gt;
|1720&lt;br /&gt;
|an inflated financial market which ultimately collapses, as first used in reference to the South Sea Bubble.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=bubble&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[bureaucracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|busywork&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|meaningless activity under the pretense of accomplishing something&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cabin fever&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|a mental and emotional reaction to a confinement on freedom of mobility as though imprisoned in a cabin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|can-do&lt;br /&gt;
|1903 &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;according to the Oxford English Dictionary. [https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/can-do Miram-webster] gives the date of 1945&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Phrase coined in a short story by [[Rudyard Kipling]] that has come to refer to an attitude that espouses individual ability and responsibility and not reliance on [[entitlements]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cantorize]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2014&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;named after the upset landslide defeat of the [[House]] [[Majority Leader]] [[Eric Cantor]] in his own primary.  Made popular by [[Sarah Palin]] on national television in 2016 by declaring that she will campaign against [[Speaker of the House]] [[Paul Ryan]] in his primary.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|to be removed from a high political position by a vote in one's own primary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[capitalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-1855&lt;br /&gt;
|creating jobs and wealth based on a private invention, ownership and investments rather than state-controlled resources&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|career politician&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First use found by ''Conservapedia'' was in an article describing a controversy in communist [[Yugoslavia]] over their &amp;quot;career politicians,&amp;quot; published in the ''New York Times'' and authored by Malcolm W. Browne, sect. 4, p. 3, col. 1.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term originally used for the entrenched communist government officials in Yugoslavia, with whom even President Tito was fed up; today it applies to the thousands of self-serving politicians who avoid productive jobs&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[carpetbagger]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1868&lt;br /&gt;
|a politician who moves to a new area to be elected to a government position, as in [[Hillary Clinton]] moving to [[New York]] to become a U.S. Senator&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|carte blanche&lt;br /&gt;
|1645-1655&lt;br /&gt;
|unconditional authority or power, without any limits on misuse of that power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cash discount&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|a reduction in price for payment by cash, in recognition of how cash is more efficient&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|catharsis&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating forgiveness and spiritual renewal by expression, as in writing or teaching or confession&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|caucus&lt;br /&gt;
|1763&lt;br /&gt;
|citizens or representatives gathering to meet and reach political decisions as a group while harnessing aspects of the [[best of the public]]; first coined by [[John Adams]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The future author of the Massachusetts Constitution who also played a role in developing the [[Declaration of Independence]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when he described a meeting of political Boston elders as a &amp;quot;caucus club&amp;quot;; the word may be from an Algonquian term for a group of advisers or elders.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cesspool&lt;br /&gt;
|1782&lt;br /&gt;
|an evil or corrupt place or state.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chairwarmer&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William Safire popularized this word in his regular ''New York Times'' column entitled''On Language'' (March 8, 1987).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who is useless and ineffective while holding a position, as in &amp;quot;[[Biden]] would at most be a chairwarmer of a president&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chaperone&lt;br /&gt;
|1720&lt;br /&gt;
|care and well-being of youths overseen by adults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|charisma&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|literally &amp;quot;a gift from God&amp;quot;, charisma is a personal magic of leadership found in [[conservative]] public figures (but beware of the liberal tendency to put style before substance!) &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|checkmate&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First usage as a verb then, see https://www.etymonline.com/word/checkmate&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a verb from the [[conservative]] game of [[chess]] which is widely used in many contexts today&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chicken Little&lt;br /&gt;
|1895&lt;br /&gt;
|one who falsely predicts disaster, especially for silly reasons: &amp;quot;global alarmists&amp;quot; are the Chicken Littles of our time&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In characteristically [[liberal]] style, the online Merriam-Webster spins the [[global warming]] example usage by saying the data showed he wasn't a Chicken Little.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Chinese wall&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|a beneficial, impregnable wall that safeguards against wrongdoing&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|choice, not an echo&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Popularized by the bestselling book entitled &amp;quot;[[A Choice Not An Echo]]&amp;quot; by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] in 1964.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a pithy slogan that objects to politics-as-usual as controlled by insiders regardless of which political party wins&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christmas card&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|another conservative innovation that apparently did not exist earlier, even though mail did; cards that say &amp;quot;Seasons Greetings&amp;quot; are a cheap imitation now.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Christmas tree&lt;br /&gt;
|1835&lt;br /&gt;
|the immensely popular custom of using an evergreen tree to support ornaments, cards and gifts, and symbolize life impervious to the darkness and cold of winter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|chump change&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|a term that highlights the insignificance of an amount of money; used especially against a miser or someone who makes the mistake of thinking money is more important than [[Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|churchgoer&lt;br /&gt;
|1687&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who makes an effort, during the 168 hours in a week, to attend a church service&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|circle the wagons&lt;br /&gt;
|1800s&lt;br /&gt;
|regroup with family and friends, when under attack. usage from settlers in the old US west.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|citizen's arrest&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|private enforcement of the law without the need of a taxpayer-funded police officer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|civil defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|civilians protecting themselves and their community against attack or natural disasters&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|1799&lt;br /&gt;
|pretentious, verbose, and often liberal nonsense; example usage: &amp;quot;the professor wasted the rest of the class on his [[liberal claptrap]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class act&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|exemplify conservative principles with values, integrity and a work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|class warfare&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|this concept was initially coined by [[Karl Marx]] in ''[[The Communist Manifesto]]'', but it has become so discredited that it is now used mostly by conservatives to point out liberal demagoguery&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|closed shop&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|a business that requires membership in a union as a condition of working there; 22 conservative states prohibit this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|clueless&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|hopelessly ignorant about something important, as liberals often are&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Coase theorem|Coasean]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|an efficient result or bargain based on market forces without the distortions caused by [[transaction costs]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cogent&lt;br /&gt;
|1659&lt;br /&gt;
|compelling with the powerful force of reason, the opposite of [[liberal]] claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cold turkey&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|a slang term for doing something all at once, as in defeating an addiction by completely turning away from it, often by using power of the [[Bible]] and [[Christ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Cold War]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[George Orwell]] shortly after he wrote ''Animal Farm'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.worldwar2history.info/war/causes/Cold-War.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as recognition that communist nations were at war with American freedom even in the absence of actual military conflict&lt;br /&gt;
|-	&lt;br /&gt;
|collectivism&lt;br /&gt;
|1857&lt;br /&gt;
|when decision-making by a group takes priority over the good ideas of an individual, often preventing progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Columbian&lt;br /&gt;
|1757&lt;br /&gt;
|relating to Christopher Columbus ''or the United States''	&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|commie&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|abbreviation for &amp;quot;communist&amp;quot; that captures their simple-minded totalitarianism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|common sense&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|sound judgment based on facts&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|competitive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Con Con]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Phyllis Schlafly]] to highlight the deception and risks inherent in proposed national constitutional conventions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conniption&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria or alarm, as in &amp;quot;having a conniption fit&amp;quot;; a typical response by [[liberals]] when confronted with their [[double standards]] and illogical positions&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|conservation of charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|overall charge does not change in an isolated system; it is neither created nor destroyed; the concept was first suggested by [[Benjamin Franklin]] but the date of origin for this term is surprisingly recent&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1808&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[T]his is one of those rare cases when the [Oxford English Dictionary] gets something wrong.  America, not Britain, deserves credit for inventing the word.  Jacob Wagner, a Massachusetts federalist, first used ''conservative'' in its modern political sense in a letter dated May 13, 1808.&amp;quot;  David Lefer, ''The Founding Conservatives'', page 5 (2013).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|principles of limited government, personal responsibility, moral values, and productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[conservative field]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s?&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of physical force over a region such that items moving throughout the region can store energy ''without loss'', as in the planetary system and electrical products&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The mathematical definition of a conservative field -- which arises in [[multivariable calculus]] -- is that a scalar potential exists for the function and, alternatively, it is [[irrotational]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-ly&lt;br /&gt;
|[[consumer surplus]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First coined by Cambridge University Professor Alfred Marshall in his acclaimed text, ''Principles of Economics'' (1890).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the extra benefit received by consumers above the price they paid for a good or service, illustrating the value of the [[free market]]; specifically, consumer surplus is the difference between what consumers would have paid for something, and the lower price they did pay.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constant&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) something unchanging in value&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|constitutionality&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|its date of origin is the year of the [[Constitutional Convention]] that proposed the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|contrarian&lt;br /&gt;
|1657&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates views contrary to that of others; this type of person frustrates [[liberal]] attempts to gain control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cooking the data&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Charles Babbage]] used it in his book, &amp;quot;Reflections on the Decline of Science in England.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.scientus.org/Church-Science-History.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copacetic&lt;br /&gt;
|1890s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster officially lists its date of origin as 1919 and its source as unknown, but that is well after when Robinson says he developed it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Bill “Bojangles” Robinson, tap dancer extraordinaire, claimed the invention of this word; it was first popularized by African Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cop-out&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|taking the easy way out, usually by shirking one's responsibilities&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|copyright&lt;br /&gt;
|1735&lt;br /&gt;
|extending private property to protect expressive works&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|corporate socialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency of large corporations to act in a socialistic manner, at the expense of meritocracy and productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|correlate&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|(verb) to show that one thing relates to another, such as [[atheism]] or [[homosexuality]] and selfishness or lack of charity; [[liberal]]s falsely rely on anecdotes to deny the general relationship&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[countability (Mathematics)|countability]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1874&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Georg Cantor]], loathed by the leading contemporary [[mathematicians]], developed this in proving that the real numbers are ''uncountable''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterexample&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|an example that is contrary to the proposition. A common point in logical, reasoned debate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterfactual&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|especially assumptions that are contrary to fact; Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] wrote for the [[U.S. Supreme Court]], &amp;quot;petitioners' standing does not require precise proof of what the Board's policies might have been in that counterfactual world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd.'', 130 S. Ct. 3138, 3163 (2010) (5-4 decision).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counterproductive&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|interfering with a worthy goal.  Example usage: &amp;quot;nearly everything a liberal supports is counterproductive.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|counter-reformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|a movement in response to another movement, as in a counter-reformation to the [[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cover-up&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|concealment by government officials of the truth about a matter of public concern&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crackpot&lt;br /&gt;
|1884&lt;br /&gt;
|crazy talk, lunacy, a person on the fringe of reality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[creation science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|a term coined by the [[Young-Earth creationism|young-Earth creationist]] [[Henry Morris]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR2006022801716.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Credentialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|the often-false belief that credentials make someone a better or more competent person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|creativity&lt;br /&gt;
|1875&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability, unique to God and his likeness, to make something from nothing&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cronyism&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice of appointing friends to important government or political positions, rather than the most ideologically aligned or competent; this was particularly a flaw in [[George W. Bush]]'s administration&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cross-examination&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|the most effective tool against [[liberal]] [[deceit]], better than even the requirement of an oath&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|crystal clear&lt;br /&gt;
|1815&lt;br /&gt;
|liberals are the opposite&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[culture war]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|widespread use after the book ''Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America'' by James Davison Hunter&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|cyberbullying&lt;br /&gt;
|2000s&lt;br /&gt;
|a type of obnoxious and hurtful liberal behavior on the internet&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[dark money]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|money that influences politics in secretive ways without traceability to its mega-donors, such as [[George Soros]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|de minimis&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|an inconsequential amount.  Sample usage: &amp;quot;Liberals typically spend at most de minimis time reading the Bible.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deadweight loss]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1930s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Confirmation of the first use is desired.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the loss in overall wealth and efficiency imposed by monopolies and taxation, due to the loss in extra value that someone would have received beyond what he would have paid for a good at a free market price&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|death panel&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a provision of [[Obamacare]] that will enable a panel of government bureaucrats to decide who receives medical treatment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[death tax]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|interestingly, the term was coined by Canadians opposed to the high estate tax on their assets held in the United States; [[Frank Luntz]] is credited with later popularizing this term in the United States.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' Dr. Frank Luntz, ''Words That Work: It's Not What You Say, It's What People Hear''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|debunk&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|derived from &amp;quot;bunkum&amp;quot; (nonsense), a term that originated in 1845 based on a silly, tiresome speech made by Congressman Felix Walker on the floor of Congress in 1820 in which he said his real audience was his constituents in Buncombe County, NC&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decentralization&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|the dispersion of power, as in a shift from national to local control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|decrypt&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|military code-breaking, which played an instrumental role in World War II in deciphering enemy codes that many felt were unbreakable; illustrates the &amp;quot;can do&amp;quot; approach of conservatism in a patriotic way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deep state]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|the entrenched bureaucracy in [[Washington, D.C.|D.C.]] that opposes and undermines attempts by a [[conservative]] president to scale back government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[defeatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative attitude that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defensive driving&lt;br /&gt;
|1964&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of driving a car that always focuses on avoiding accidents, even those potentially caused by others; nearly a half-century later, dictionaries still do not recognize this term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deflation&lt;br /&gt;
|1891&lt;br /&gt;
|an increase in the value of savings&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|defund&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|refers especially to termination of government funding of a wasteful or hurtful program&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberative assembly&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Introduction to Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised'' (19th Ed. 2000), xxv.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Edmund Burke in describing the British parliament during a speech to voters in Bristol; he meant a body of persons meeting to discuss and decide common action under parliamentary law&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|demagogue&lt;br /&gt;
|1648&lt;br /&gt;
|the initial meaning of &amp;quot;demagogue&amp;quot; was positive, but preacher Robert South gave it a negative connotation in 1716 by observing that a &amp;quot;plausible, insignificant word, in the mouth of an expert demagogue, is a dangerous and a dreadful weapon.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|demonic&lt;br /&gt;
|1662&lt;br /&gt;
|in its serious usage, &amp;quot;demonic&amp;quot; refers to actions that seem to be influenced by [[evil]] or by [[Satan]] himself, such as when someone acts out of character in a wrongful way, or when a group goes in a bad direction, or when random chance takes an unlikely bizarre turn; demonic also explains why some events or activities become more overbearing than they should&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|denaturalization&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jones v. McMasters, 61 U.S. (20 How.) 8 (1858).  An earlier use of 1800 is cited by Merriam-Webster but for a different, non-legal meaning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|taking away the citizenship of a naturalized citizen (a &amp;quot;[[natural born citizen]]&amp;quot; cannot be denaturalized).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deregulation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|Reagan won in 1980 by campaigning on this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|design by committee&lt;br /&gt;
|before 1958&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative term directed against collective production by a group &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|despotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1727&lt;br /&gt;
|a ruler with unlimited powers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[deterrence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|Disincentive of committing a crime based on the amount of punishment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devalue&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|describing an unwelcome attitude or act, as in &amp;quot;devaluing human life&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devil's advocate&lt;br /&gt;
|1760&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who espouses the position of the wrong side, in order to test, sharpen and strengthen the right side&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|devotee&lt;br /&gt;
|1645&lt;br /&gt;
|ardent follower, supporter, or loyalty to. 56 years separates devotee and devoted&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|disinformation&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|false information spread (and sometimes manufactured) by groups with a strong political agenda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|division of labor&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing productivity through specialization of labor, as in a husband working in manufacturing while his wife cares for children&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dog and pony show&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an overblown event, typically having more fanfare than substance; liberals like to run a &amp;quot;dog and pony show&amp;quot; in towns having a large public university, where students brainwashed by liberal professors are led like cattle to the events&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[domino effect]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|how the fall of one nation to communism can result in its harmful spread to neighboring nations&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|double standard&lt;br /&gt;
|1894&lt;br /&gt;
|applying harsher criticism against one group, such as churchgoers or conservatives, than against another group, such as atheists or liberals; recognition of a double standard by the [[Prodigal Son]] led him to repent and convert&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doublethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a term first coined by [[George Orwell]] in his dystopian novel ''[[1984]]''; it means simultaneously holding contradictory beliefs, which is a characteristic of [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|doubting Thomas&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who believes only what he can see and touch, and doubts all else; named after the [[Apostle]] Thomas as described at [[John 15-21 (Translated)#20:24|John 20:24]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[drain the swamp]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Donald Trump]], it is an expression that President [[Ronald Reagan]] once used in 1983 to “drain the swamp” in reference to big government in D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|drifter&lt;br /&gt;
|1897&lt;br /&gt;
|someone whose residency wanders about aimlessly, failing to become a permanent, productive member of any community&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|duh science&lt;br /&gt;
|2000&lt;br /&gt;
|First coined by the ''LA Weekly'' to criticize the ''[[LA Times]]'' for failing to criticize a publicly funded study that concluded that pessimistic people are often in bad moods.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Originally &amp;quot;duh!&amp;quot; science: &amp;quot;But couldn't we have been treated to just a soupcon of critical thinking, some irony even -- perhaps a glancing reference to the wisdom of public funding for 'duh!' science?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;L.A. TIMES WHO KNEW? DEPARTMENT&amp;quot;, ''LA Weekly'' p. 12 (Jan. 14, 2000).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumb down&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|dumpster diving&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|Searching through dumpsters for food or other material that can used rather than discarded; first known use: &amp;quot;Restaurant and store owners have complained about drunks panhandling during the day and 'dumpster diving' through trash at night.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Phil Long, &amp;quot;Special Wing for Drunks Suggested at Future Jail,&amp;quot; Miami Herald D1 (Nov. 24, 1982).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It is also a popular method used by watchdog groups; they rummage through the trash of organizations they consider to be corrupt, hoping to find evidence to use against them (televangelist Robert Tilton's ministry was brought down in such a manner; thousands of prayer requests -- with all the donations removed -- were found in the dumpster of his attorney).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|duplicitous&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|someone—particularly a liberal politician—who deceptively says one thing when he really intends to do something else&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Eagle Scout&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest rank in the [[Boy Scouts]], the term also means &amp;quot;a straight-arrow and self-reliant man.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|earmark&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;A provision in congressional legislation that allocates a specified amount of money for a specific project, program or organization.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster's Dictionary (2009).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|echo chamber&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|a figurative room with sound-reflecting walls, where people give opinions that influence no one and are heard only by other people who have their own opinions, such as cable news talk shows&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|economic rent&lt;br /&gt;
|1889&lt;br /&gt;
|revenue above the minimum amount to keep a good or service on the market, typically due to monopoly power; notice the date of origin was only one year prior to passage of the conservative [[Sherman Act]] in 1990&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|editorialize&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;to introduce opinion into the reporting of facts&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|educrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|a liberal education bureaucrat&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[efficiency]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1633&lt;br /&gt;
|ultimately from the Latin ''efficientem'', meaning ''&amp;quot;working out, or accomplishing&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=efficient Online Etymological Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|egotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1714&lt;br /&gt;
|the root of atheism, as explained by Paul in Romans 1:21-22; the root of depression and anxiety also&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|electioneering&lt;br /&gt;
|1780s&lt;br /&gt;
|to work for the success of a particular candidate, party, ticket, etc., in an election. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elementary proof]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|a mathematical proof based on the minimum assumptions associated with real analysis; term probably does not predate [[complex analysis]] and its first use may have been the English mathematician James Joseph Sylvester's paper, &amp;quot;On an elementary proof and generalisation of Sir Isaac Newton's hitherto undenionstrated rule for the discovery of imaginary roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/circular129johnuoft/circular129johnuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[elitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|an attitude or belief in one's superiority based solely on membership in a particular group or community, especially liberals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[embryoscopy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first endoscopic image of the unborn child was in 1967, by Mandelbaum.  The date of origin of the term &amp;quot;embryoscopy&amp;quot; may have been later, but likely before the 1990s.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Search this term on the internet and see the spectacular photos of the unborn child (&amp;quot;embryo&amp;quot;) that were &amp;quot;scoped&amp;quot; by tiny cameras.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|empowerment&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|facilitating power for the ordinary; see also [[best of the public]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|empty nest&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|a family home after children have grown and left&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|endgame&lt;br /&gt;
|1881&lt;br /&gt;
|a term from the [[conservative]] game of [[chess]] which refers to the final part of a project or triumph&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[entitlement]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|a liberal welfare state's &amp;quot;reward&amp;quot; for refusing to work hard and succeed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|entrepreneur&lt;br /&gt;
|1852&lt;br /&gt;
|a brave person willing to take the necessary risks to establish a business, often found in the free market enterprise system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[ethnic voting]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|widely recognized and even advocated by some,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/1/5/2/3/4/p152345_index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet the dictionary doesn't yet recognize it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|etiquette&lt;br /&gt;
|1740&lt;br /&gt;
|social standards of behavior that promote dignity and discourage inept communications (or lack thereof)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Eurabia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|A satirical word based on the idea that Europe is rapidly becoming Islamized.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Eurosceptic]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who opposes joining the super-socialist [[European Union]]; some prefer the term &amp;quot;Eurorealist&amp;quot; to express this opposition, and sometimes &amp;quot;Eurosceptic&amp;quot; is used to criticize opponents of the EU&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|everyman&lt;br /&gt;
|1906&lt;br /&gt;
|the typical person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exceptional&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|same year of origin as the [[U.S. Constitution]]!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|exculpatory&lt;br /&gt;
|1781&lt;br /&gt;
|often used in the phrase &amp;quot;exculpatory evidence,&amp;quot; it took nearly 50 years to develop this term after origination of the legal term suggesting guilt: &amp;quot;incriminate&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|existence proof&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|overcoming denial that something is possible by referencing its existence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expatriate&lt;br /&gt;
|1768&lt;br /&gt;
|to give up one's own citizenship, or be banished by one's own nation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|explain away&lt;br /&gt;
|1704&lt;br /&gt;
|a weaker form of [[liberal denial]], &amp;quot;explain away&amp;quot; the truth is the only way that some remain liberal as they grow older&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|expose&lt;br /&gt;
|1803&lt;br /&gt;
|(noun) a statement of the facts, typically to discredit wrongdoing by government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|eyeball-to-eyeball&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;We're eyeball to eyeball, and I think the other fellow just blinked&amp;quot; was a conservative statement by Secretary of State Dean Rusk during the [[Cuban Missile Crisis]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nsa/cuba_mis_cri/annals.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|facade&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;1845 is the date of origin for the figurative use.  The literal use dates back to 1650s, meaning the front of a building.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Example usage: &amp;quot;The facade of a liberal politician is often conservative.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fair shake&lt;br /&gt;
|1830&lt;br /&gt;
|approaching an idea or concept with an open mind&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fairy tale&lt;br /&gt;
|1749&lt;br /&gt;
|a fanciful fictional story.  Sample usage: &amp;quot;[[Evolution]] is a fairy tale for adults who don't want to read and accept the logic of the [[Bible]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faith healing&lt;br /&gt;
|1885&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faithless elector&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|an elector in the [[Electoral College]] who violates his pledge to support the candidate chosen by the voters in his state, and instead votes for someone else or abstains; the [[liberal media]] thereby referred to electors who might betray Trump&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fake news]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The term was used by [[liberals]] in late 2016, and had sporadic use going back even as early as the 1890s, but did not become common until 2017 when President Trump began using it.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Popularized by President [[Donald Trump]] in describing false smears by the [[liberal media]] against him and other [[conservatives]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|false flag&lt;br /&gt;
|2015&lt;br /&gt;
|deceptive tactic by [[ISIS]] and other insurgents to commit heinous acts but falsely make it look like the governing regime did it.  The origin of the name comes from a ship sailing under the false flag of its adversary until it got close enough to fire upon them.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[family values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1916&lt;br /&gt;
|a moral code that binds together and strengthens a typical family unit; widespread use after a speech by Vice President [[Dan Quayle]], 1992 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fat farm&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a place where obese people—such as self-centered [[atheists]]—might go to try to lose weight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|father figure&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who fulfills the essential role of a father, biological or figurative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|faux conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|1990&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First coined by ''The Economist'', in &amp;quot;[[New England]]'s governors; All change&amp;quot; (September 22, 1990), in reference to Lowell Weicker's &amp;quot;loss in 1988 to a Faux-conservative Democrat, Mr [[Joseph Lieberman]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|federal government&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|used by [[Alexander Hamilton]] in the first phrase of the ''[[Federalist Papers]]'' to signify a government that is not fully sovereign, as the States are&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[federalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1789&lt;br /&gt;
|the unique system of dual sovereigns, state and federal (national), established by the [[U.S. Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fear-mongering&lt;br /&gt;
|1938&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The ''[[New York Times]]'' attributed the first use -- ironically -- to President [[Franklin Delano Roosevelt]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a method of stirring up exaggerated fear by the public, typically to expand government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|feedback&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|an all-important element of accountability and improvement, and a key consideration in good engineering design&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fellow traveller]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|may have existed earlier, but popularized in 1924 by Leon Trotsky. Describes a sympathizer of a cause but who does not formally belong to the cause, such as a [[communist]] sympathizer who is not part of the communist party. The term was invented by the communists in its original, non-negative sense, but the conservatives were the first to use it as a pejorative term. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[fiscal cliff]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined by Federal Reserve Chairman [[Ben Bernanke]], it refers to the effect on the economy of a sharp drop in spending and perhaps an increase in taxes scheduled to take effect at approximately the same time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.benjaminfedwards.com/blog/?p=197&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Flip flop (politics)|flip-flop]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|''verb'', meaning to change political position, typically due to [[liberal]] pressure.  First used by the Republican S.I. Hayakawa campaign to describe California Democratic incumbent U.S. Senator John Tunney, whom Hayakawa defeated in an upset.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|force majeure&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|an intervening event beyond ordinary anticipation, such as an act of [[God]] or, in 2020, the [[coronavirus]] pandemic, which justifies nullifying a legal [[contract]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|force-feed&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|to force someone to accept something, often against that person's will; what liberals do to students in [[public schools]] today in training them to be [[atheist]]ic socialists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Essay: Fornonormativity|fornonormativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|A state of a society, organization, or group in which fornication and related behaviors are presupposed to be normal, morally good, and expected. In a fornonormative social milieu, people who abstain from or oppose certain behaviors are considered deviant or worse.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|forward-looking&lt;br /&gt;
|1800&lt;br /&gt;
|planning for the future rather than dwelling on the past&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Founding Fathers&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|the several dozen [[Christian]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html Religious Affiliation of the Founding Fathers of the United States of America, Adherents.com]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, not semi-secular deists, contrary to popular belief, who helped draft the formative documents of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[free enterprise]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free lunch&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|something acquired ostensibly without paying for it, as in welfare; often used to remind people that &amp;quot;there's no such thing as a free lunch&amp;quot; in order to point out that it must cost someone something, now or later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[free market]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|an economy wherein anyone can run a business with limited government intervention, if not none at all&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free speech&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|shorthand for &amp;quot;freedom of speech,&amp;quot; but with a connotation that extends to non-citizens and listeners; first used in a U.S. Supreme Court opinion in dissent in the [[Slaughter-House Cases]] by Justice Bradley&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|free world&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|areas of the world free of communism, fascism, and other dystopian, oppressive liberal governments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|freeloader&lt;br /&gt;
|1934&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who avoids paying or working to earn a share of a benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|frontiersmen&lt;br /&gt;
|1814&lt;br /&gt;
|living and working in a self-sufficient manner and with courage in a new land.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|fuzzy math&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|non-computational math designed to obscure the differences between the correct answers and the incorrect—but perhaps politically motivated—answers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|galvanize&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|as in, &amp;quot;the liberal proposals ''galvanized'' the grassroots in opposition&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gambit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a sacrifice that obtains an advantageous position, as in the game of [[chess]] ([[Bobby Fischer]]'s queen's gambit was a masterpiece) or in real life (the [[Passion of Christ]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gamble&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|to intentionally take a risk for the sake of the risk itself, often addictive and even [[demonic]] as in [[gambling]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gang up&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|group pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gateway drug&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|a slang term describing an addictive substance that can lead to a more addictive substance, as in when abuse of alcohol/marijuana eventually leads to harder drugs cocaine/heroin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gerrymandering]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1812&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a newspaper editor to criticize the manipulation of the lines of a new district into a salamander shape&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.allbusiness.com/information/publishing-industries/251259-1.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that favored election of a liberal politician&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gimmick&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant a deceptive mechanical device for controlling a [[gambling]] machine, and then its meaning expanded to include all trickery to attract attention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|girlie men&lt;br /&gt;
|1988&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Arnold Schwarzenegger]] before he became [[California]]'s Republican governor, beginning when he campaigned for President [[George H.W. Bush]] by referring to his [[liberal]] opponents as &amp;quot;girlie men&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Giving Tuesday&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|a day of charity during the [[Christmas]] season, in response to &amp;quot;Black Friday&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Cyber Monday&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[globalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1997&lt;br /&gt;
|Merriam-Webster states it was first used in 1943&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/globalism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the OED gives a date of 1965 for the exact term &amp;quot;globalism&amp;quot;;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50095613/50095613se2?single=1&amp;amp;query_type=word&amp;amp;queryword=globalism&amp;amp;first=1&amp;amp;max_to_show=10&amp;amp;hilite=50095613se2&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the term &amp;quot;globalization&amp;quot; was first used in the mid-1980s in a different, complimentary sense.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|God-fearing&lt;br /&gt;
|1835 &lt;br /&gt;
|Living by the rules of God; living in a way that is considered morally right.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|godsend&lt;br /&gt;
|1820&lt;br /&gt;
|something so miraculous that there is no other explanation for it other than it being a blessing from God; can be used positively in both the literal and figurative sense&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|go-getter&lt;br /&gt;
|1921&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who works hard with unwavering determination to achieve a goal&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gold standard]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest standard.  With respect to currency, when money could be exchanged for a fixed amount of gold.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|golden parachute&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for a pre-arranged handout to a corporate executive when fired, as when the company is taken over by new ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|good book&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|the [[Bible]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Good Samaritan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who performs acts of voluntary charity, as did a Samaritan in one of Jesus' parables&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|goon&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a dim-witted thug, especially one who intimidates on behalf of a union&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|government school&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[economist]] [[Milton Friedman]] as a more accurate name for [[public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grade inflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency by Liberal educationalists and public schools to increase marks, irrespective of merit or actual achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[gradualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1835&lt;br /&gt;
|a form of [[liberal creep]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|grandmaster&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|the elite [[chess]] ranking of excellence, based entirely on merit, which is 99% male to the dismay of [[feminist]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|grandstand&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|to act in an insincere or exaggerated manner in order to try to impress onlookers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[grassroots]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1901&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|gravy train&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|easy money for little or no work, in contrast with the work ethic; notice how the [[Great Depression]] hit two years later&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|greasy spoon&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|a free enterprise term for a small, cheap restaurant - which in many places is just what the public wants; reflects Jesus' [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] about the digestive system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Great Awakening]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1730-1740&lt;br /&gt;
|A religious revival.  Christian Great Awakenings recur periodically.  See [[Essay:The Coming Fifth Great Awakening in America]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Gresham's Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency in a free market for bad money (which loses its value) to drive out (be used more often in transactions) than good money (which retains its value), because people want to horde the good money while getting rid of the bad money; a similar effect can be seen when profanity drives out intelligent discussion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[groupthink]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a style of thought consisting of conformity to a manufactured consensus and self-deception; coined by William H. Whyte in 1952.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|guardian angel&lt;br /&gt;
|1631&lt;br /&gt;
|a protector who guards someone from danger or evil; sometimes even a stranger unknown to the person protected.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|half-baked&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|an idea that can appear reasonable at first, but with just a little thought it is recognized to be absurd&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hallmark&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|purity, authenticity, as in an official seal or distinguishing feature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|handout&lt;br /&gt;
|1882&lt;br /&gt;
|describes charity and government giveaways&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|happy talk&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|senseless banter among broadcasters in the [[lamestream media]], as a substitute for real news; more generally, happy talk is unjustifiably feel-good rhetoric that implicitly denies the real existence of [[Hell]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hardworking&lt;br /&gt;
|1774&lt;br /&gt;
|the quality of working persistently to achieve something&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|harmless error&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|an insignificant violation of a duty or procedural rule; first used in ''Western Ins. Co. v. The Goody Friends'', 29 F. Cas. 764 (S.D. Ohio 1861) (referring to a duty)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hatchet job&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|still looking for the context of its first use; today it means an article, typically by a liberal, that misleadingly smears someone, typically a conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hawthorne effect&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&lt;br /&gt;
|the increase in achievement resulting merely from being observed; this was demonstrated by experiment at the Hawthorne Works of Western Electric in Cicero, Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heartland&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&lt;br /&gt;
|the central portion of the United States known for its [[conservative]] values and lack of control by the [[liberal media]] and [[Hollywood]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|heckler's veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by University of Chicago Law Professor Harvey Kalven, Jr., a strong supporter of free speech in politics, this term has been used in [[Supreme Court]] decisions by Justices [[Sam Alito]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''See'' ''Pleasant Grove City v. Summum'', 129 S. Ct. 1125 (2009); ''see also'' ''Child Evangelism Fellowship of N.J., Inc. v. Stafford Twp. Sch. Dist.'', 386 F.3d 514 (3rd Cir. 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Antonin Scalia]], and [[Clarence Thomas]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch.'', 533 U.S. 98 (2001)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|high maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The use of the term was picked up and repeated in a movie released in 1989, ''When Harry Met Sally'' (1989).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
|someone, often liberal, who repeatedly demands attention and unproductive help from others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hindsight&lt;br /&gt;
|1866&lt;br /&gt;
|understanding of an event or decision with the benefit of wisdom gained afterward&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[hippie]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|a member of the original 1960s counterculture, which rejects traditional morality, encourages smoking [[marijuana]] and [[LSD]], promotes feminine hairstyles on men and masculine hairstyles on women, encourages limitless extramarital sex, and shuns hard work; this term became increasingly pejorative over time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hissy fit&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|an unjustified tantrum, typically female in nature, as in &amp;quot;[[feminist]]s had a hissy fit when [[Lawrence Summers]] suggested (but criticized) the possibility that women have weaker scientific aptitude than men, and Summers ultimately resigned.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hoax&lt;br /&gt;
|1796&lt;br /&gt;
|to deceive the public into believing something that is false, often to pull people away from the [[Christianity]] and the [[Bible]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Hobson's choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;this term has the entertaining history of originating with an English liveryman who required customers to &amp;quot;choose&amp;quot; the horse closest to the door.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an ostensible choice that disguises a lack of freedom, because each alternative is completely unacceptable.  This term is invoked to criticize an illusory freedom of choice.  This term has been used in 48 cases by Supreme Court Justices, more often by conservatives than by liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hokey&lt;br /&gt;
|1927&lt;br /&gt;
|phony, in an obvious or corny way (in 1908, &amp;quot;hokum&amp;quot; originated, which means pretentious nonsense&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hokum&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Holy Week&lt;br /&gt;
|1710&lt;br /&gt;
|the week leading up to [[Easter]], including the [[Passion]], [[Crucifixion]] and [[Resurrection]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[home rule]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/home-rule Dictionary.com estimates the first use as being at 1855-60]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|self-government on an issue at a local level, as in curriculum in education being established by a school district rather than the state or federal government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homemaker]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|a wife and mother whose efforts are wisely spent running the household for the family&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homeschool]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;the OED assigns a date of origin of 1850 to &amp;quot;homeschool&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hometown&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|the place where someone grew up and typically obtained some benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[homosexual agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1989&lt;br /&gt;
|the sociopolitical ideology governing homosexuals; used to promote the agenda in the book ''After the Ball'', but then used to criticize the movement by Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] in his dissent in ''Lawrence v. Texas'' (2003)''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|honor system&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach to discipline that emphasizes and encourages trust, honesty and personal responsibility rather than constant supervision&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|human rights&lt;br /&gt;
|1766&lt;br /&gt;
|rights of all peoples, such as to &amp;quot;life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness&amp;quot; as set forth in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hype&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|originally meant to deceive or &amp;quot;put on,&amp;quot; and then its meaning shifted slightly to represent extravagant promotion of something as the liberal media often do&lt;br /&gt;
set forth in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hypergamy&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|the preference of many women to &amp;quot;marry up,&amp;quot; which requires a society where men tend to make more than women do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hyphenated American&lt;br /&gt;
|1889&lt;br /&gt;
|an American citizen who identifies as another nationality before identifying as American; President Theodore Roosevelt said in 1915, &amp;quot;There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hypothesis&lt;br /&gt;
|1656&lt;br /&gt;
|a suggestion, typically scientific in nature, which must be tested and proven before asserted as truth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|hysteria&lt;br /&gt;
|1801&lt;br /&gt;
|From the Latin ''hystericus'', from Greek ''hystera '' meaning ''&amp;quot;womb&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hysteria Meriam Webster Dictionary]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (an old notion that hysteria was caused by the [[womb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|idealist&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a person guided by ideals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|illiteracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1660&lt;br /&gt;
|a lack of reading comprehension or writing ability, which often results in lack of free will; liberals seek to produce illiterate voters who lack independence, and many graduates of the [[public schools]] are illiterate today&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inalienable&lt;br /&gt;
|1640s&lt;br /&gt;
|describes something cannot be taken away, especially by government, as in &amp;quot;inalienable rights&amp;quot; in the [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inattentive&lt;br /&gt;
|1741&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Date of origin given by the Online Etymology Dictionary; Merriam-Webster cites an earlier date of origin, perhaps with a narrower meaning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|more than 150 years before the discovery in physics of the connection between attentiveness/observation and uncertainty/chaos, this conservative word cautioned against inattentiveness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incentivize&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|to create a reward to encourage good work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incidental inequality&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|inequalities that result as side effects of an objectively just system &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incoherent&lt;br /&gt;
|1626&lt;br /&gt;
|not consistently making sense; the term often applies to liberal [[double standard]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|incompleteness&lt;br /&gt;
|1931&lt;br /&gt;
|a system of logic or mathematics that includes propositions that are impossible to prove or disprove; term coined as a result of [[Kurt Gödel]]'s work in 1931&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[incrementalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1966&lt;br /&gt;
|imposing bad political or social change slowly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|indecisive&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|being unable to make a decision; can result from a lack of [[faith]] and determination&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1640&lt;br /&gt;
|free will&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[individualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|the idea that values, rights and duties arise from the individual&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[inerrancy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|free from error, as in &amp;quot;biblical inerrancy&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|infinitesimal&lt;br /&gt;
|1706&lt;br /&gt;
|vanishingly small and approaching [[zero]], as in the [[faith]] of an [[atheist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inflationary&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|policies causing inflation of the monetary supply&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|informed consent&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|consent to surgery is meaningful only if informed, a requirement that should apply to abortion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|initiative&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|self-starting first step toward improvement, overcoming a tendency of complacent underachievement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inoculate&lt;br /&gt;
|1721&lt;br /&gt;
|to safeguard against future harm by developing immunity against it.  Sample usage: &amp;quot;Conservapedia inoculates against [[liberal claptrap]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|insightful&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|what conservatism is about: gaining insights into the truth, and bettering individuals and society with them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|inside baseball&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/1988/06/19/magazine/on-language-inside-baseball.html (popularized in the 1970s, but a date of origin earlier in the 1900s is likely)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|strategy and tactics known to the well-informed participants, but mysterious to most observers&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intangible&lt;br /&gt;
|1914&lt;br /&gt;
|something valuable that cannot be seen or touched, such as goodwill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|intellectual property&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|denotes an intangible work that rightfully belongs to its creator, e.g. &amp;quot;we [should] protect intellectual property, the labors of the mind, productions and interests as much a man's own, and as much the fruit of his honest industry, as the wheat he cultivates, or the flocks he rears.&amp;quot;  ''Davoll v. Brown'', 7 F. Cas. 197 (Cir. Ct. Mass. 1845) (Woodbury, federal judge).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[intelligent design]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A few isolated references to this phrase, without its full current significance, can be found dating back to the mid-1800s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|coined in ''Darwin on Trial'', a book by Philip Johnson, who is considered the father of the intelligent design movement and who co-founded the [[Discovery Institute]]'s Center for Science and Culture in 1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://biologos.org/resources/johnson-phillip-e&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|interventionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;governmental interference in economic affairs at home or in political affairs of another country&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster (1994).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|invisible hand&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Adam Smith in the ''Wealth of Nations'' and widely used today.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[invisible hand of marriage]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|discovered on Conservapedia, it is the unseen force of productivity that results from marriage (only between a man and woman).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Iron curtain&lt;br /&gt;
|1945&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Winston Churchill in a speech in Missouri just after World War II, to describe the communist's figurative wall against freedom&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[irreducible complexity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|coined&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Alan Turing]] reportedly used the term for a completely different meaning that went nowhere. [http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/nasty-feelings-in-the-ool-community-toward-yockey/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and later adopted  and developed by [[Michael Behe]] to describe structure or system that could not possibly have evolved, because removing any part makes it nonfunctional, thereby showing that [[God]] must have created it whole into biology; if the [[Nobel Prize]] were not dominated by [[atheism]], Behe could win one for this insight.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Islamofascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1990?&lt;br /&gt;
|A form of totalitarian Muslim fundamentalist rule, or extreme Islamism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ivory tower&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a description of the pampered culture of liberal [[professor values|professors]], and how far out of touch with the truth it is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jabberwocky&lt;br /&gt;
|1872&lt;br /&gt;
|meaningless talk; coined by [[Lewis Carroll]], a [[conservative]] [[mathematician]], in his classic book &amp;quot;Through the Looking-Glass and What Alice Found There&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[John Hancock]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&lt;br /&gt;
|a personal signature, especially in a bold style that stands up for principles as [[John Hancock]] did with his signing the United States [[Declaration of Independence]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial activism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in an article in ''Fortune'' magazine by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/278089&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and repeatedly used in U.S. Supreme Court opinions since 1967,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''United States v. Wade'', &lt;br /&gt;
388 U.S. 218 (1967).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet as of 2009 [[Merriam-Webster]] dictionary still fails to recognize this widely used term.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|judicial prejudice&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|the bias of a judge in favor of a political correct identity group intended to rig outcome equality in favor of that group based on subjective bias rather than objective justice.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial restraint]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1942&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Assuming that this court has power to act, it does not necessarily follow that it should act. ... In a number of situations, and in a number of cases, it has been held that courts should voluntarily refrain from using or asserting power. Where the use or assertion of power might be destructive of a well defined purpose of law or of a declared public policy such voluntarily imposed '''judicial restraint''' may be commendable.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Osage Tribe of Indians v. Ickes, 45 F. Supp. 179, 184-85 (D.D.C. 1942) (emphasis added).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial supremacist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|one who advocates that the courts should be supreme over the other branches of government for certain legal issues; first coined in a book by [[Phyllis Schlafly]]; first used by the judiciary by the Michigan Supreme Court in ''Paige v. City of Sterling Heights'', 476 Mich. 495 (2006).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A similar yet different concept, &amp;quot;judicial supremacy,&amp;quot; was coined by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justice [[Robert H. Jackson]] as the title of his book,'' The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy: A Study of a Crisis in American Political Power'' (New York: Knopf, 1941).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[judicial taking]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1982&lt;br /&gt;
|the deprivation of private property due to a court decision; this concept was introduced by conservative Justice [[Potter Stewart]] in 1967, and the term was used for the first time independently by the Michigan and Hawaii Supreme Courts in the same month (!) in December 1982, and then used often in law review articles and Circuit Court decisions in the 2000s, and then four Justices of the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] endorsed the principle in a decision in 2010, with two others accepting the possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[junk science]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1962&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://rated.com/dir/Society/Issues/Environment/Opposing_Views/Junk_Science&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the corruption of the scientific method to advance other, often political, goals (such as [[Global Warming]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|jury nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|the power of a jury to overrule the law and acquit an ostensibly guilty defendant; the power was established in the colonies in 1735 in the trial of [[John Peter Zenger]], but this term was first used in state court by Pfeuffer v. Haas, 55 S.W.2d 111 (Tex. Civ. App. 1932) and in federal court by ''Skidmore v. Baltimore &amp;amp; O. R. Co.'', 167 F.2d 54 (2nd Cir. 1948)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kafkaesque&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|illogical, nightmare-like situations, which typically arise from [[Leftist]] control of a bureaucracy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|killjoy&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|one who spoils the pleasure of others.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/killjoy Killjoy 1776 Mer-Web]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Example''-Vandals seek to disrupt conservative wikis, an education project. They are a killjoy to the learning process.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kiss of death&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|a kiss symbolizing the promise to kill someone, from Judas's betrayal of Jesus with a kiss, Mark 14:44-4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kleptocrat&lt;br /&gt;
|1819&lt;br /&gt;
|A politician who seeks status and personal gain at the expense of the governed&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kowtow&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|obsequious, unthinking obedience to someone or something, used especially in the context of dictatorships and liberal belief systems&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Kremlinology&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the otherwise indecipherable behavior of the government of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]. Refers to the Kremlin, the traditional seat of Russian government (Soviet or not). &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|kudos&lt;br /&gt;
|1831&lt;br /&gt;
|praise for real achievement&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|la-la land&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First known use was in an article by Tom Zito, &amp;quot;Mr. Mike's Mania; Sick Humor, Very Well Indulged,&amp;quot; [[Washington Post]] F1 (Nov. 8, 1979): &amp;quot;But now, it's off to La-La land, and his movie deal. 'The thing about Southern Californians,' he says, 'is this: They wake up and say, 'Gee, what a wonderful morning. I think I'll make a salad.' And that takes them the whole day. ...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a term for the decadent, liberal culture of [[Hollywood]]-driven [[Los Angeles]], originally capitalized as &amp;quot;La-La land.&amp;quot;; Merriam-Webster is in denial about this etymology and claims a later origin of 1983.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[labor camp]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|forced work prison&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[laissez-faire]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond what is minimally necessary&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lame duck&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|one falling being in achievement, especially a public official whose power is limited because his term in office is set to expire without possibility of reelection.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[lamestream media]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by Bernie Goldberg to describe the clueless [[Mainstream media]] that repeat superficial, discredited liberal claptrap&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|landslide&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|In the political sense, an overwhelming election victory. A clear, democratic expression of popular will.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lapdog&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined by Senator [[Joe McCarthy]] in the figurative sense as he attempted to remove [[communist]]s from the [[State Department]]:  &amp;quot;Senator McCarthy (R-Wis) renewed his Communists-in-Government charges today and called Senator Tydings (D-Md) the [[Truman]] administration's 'whimpering lap dog.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.etymonline.com/word/lapdog (quoting AP news story of Aug. 7, 1950)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leadership&lt;br /&gt;
|1821&lt;br /&gt;
|an ability and willingness to lead, often by example&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|learning curve&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&lt;br /&gt;
|initial, extra time and effort that is typically necessary before someone becomes productive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Left Coast]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1990s&lt;br /&gt;
|a more descriptive term for the West Coast of the United States&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|leftism&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|principles and doctrine of leftists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|level-headed&lt;br /&gt;
|1876&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;balanced&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;having common sense and sound judgment&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[liberal creep]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&lt;br /&gt;
|liberal bias that gradually creeps or distorts an entry, definition, explanation, description, or historical account.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|life vest&lt;br /&gt;
|1939&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-life invention&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lifelong&lt;br /&gt;
|1855&lt;br /&gt;
|something, usually a commitment, that lasts a lifetime, as in &amp;quot;a lifelong commitment to [[Christ]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[limousine liberal]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a multi-millionaire who pretends to be compassionate about the poor, but supports liberal policies that increase burdens on working Americans&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|litmus test&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|use of a single political issue to determine if a candidate or nominee is acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|local&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This date refers to its first usage as a ''noun'', which is an estimate of its adoption as a concept.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|common usage: &amp;quot;all politics is local&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lockstep&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|mindless conformity, often to liberal values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|locomotive&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|a great engine of economic growth during the [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lone wolf&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who prefers to work, act, or live alone,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lone%20wolf Lone wolf, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; synonymous with self-sufficiency&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|loose cannon&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|an undisciplined person or program that dangerously lacks forethought; used in mid-November 1976 to describe $11 billion in unspent appropriations by the Ford Administration:  &amp;quot;'That money,' says Arnold Packer, a senior Senate Budget Committee economist who is helping Carter draw up his shadow budget, 'is like a loose cannon rolling around the deck' because a sudden reappearance of the funds could be inflationary.&amp;quot; (''BusinessWeek'')&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lowest common denominator&lt;br /&gt;
|1854&lt;br /&gt;
|the lowest in work ethic, morals, or knowledge among a group; typically used to criticize the liberal practice of dumbing down content&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|low-information voter&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|a term that explains why people vote for Democrats&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|lunatic fringe&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by U.S. President [[Theodore Roosevelt]] to describe members of eccentric, radical or extremist groups&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=lunatic&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|machismo&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|a slang word for masculine charm, never used favorably by feminists&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Main Street&lt;br /&gt;
|1743&lt;br /&gt;
|one of the many small towns in America, and their conservative values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mainstay&lt;br /&gt;
|1787&lt;br /&gt;
|the primary support, typically for something good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|a clergyman&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manhunt&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|notice how sexist the term is, and yet [[liberals]] have not been able to convert it to &amp;quot;personhunt&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|man-hater&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This was during the epic struggle -- and defeat -- of the so-called [[Equal Rights Amendment]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|William Safire wrote in the ''New York Times'' in 1983, &amp;quot;Misandry, from the Greek misandros for 'hating men,' is in the 1961 Merriam-Webster New International Dictionary, and the Oxford Dictionary Supplement traces it to 1946.  The word is pronounced as 'Ms. Andry,' but I wonder why we need the Greek word for it. What's wrong with good, old-fashioned man-hater?&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sunday, Oct. 30, 1983, Section 6, Page 12, Column 3.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|make-work&lt;br /&gt;
|1923&lt;br /&gt;
|inefficient or useless activity that has the false appearance of being productive; a favorite endeavor of liberals&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[market failure]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Coined as the title of a scholarly article by Francis M. Bator, &amp;quot;The Anatomy of Market Failure,&amp;quot; ''The Quarterly Journal of Economics'' (1958) [http://instruct1.cit.cornell.edu/Courses/econ335/out/bator_qje.pdf]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|instances where the free market does not provide a desirable result, as when information is withheld from an unsuspecting consumer&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|manifest destiny&lt;br /&gt;
|1845&lt;br /&gt;
|Providential design over future events, which originated in the context of expanding the United States to the Pacific Ocean&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Mardi Gras]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1699&lt;br /&gt;
|The annual celebration on the eve of [[Ash Wednesday]] and [[Lent]], particularly in the historically [[Catholic]] city of [[New Orleans]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|marriage redefinition&lt;br /&gt;
|2003&lt;br /&gt;
|descriptive term used to criticize the legalizing of same-sex marriage in [[Canada]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mask police&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|busybodies, typically [[Opposition to Donald Trump|anti-Trumpers]], who demand that others wear a mask during the [[COVID-19]] pandemic despite unproven benefits of masks&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|materialism&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the view of life that physical matter is all that exists; as an &amp;quot;ism&amp;quot;, the term criticizes such view&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|meat and potatoes&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|the most interesting or fundamental part&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Medal of Honor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|a special American military honor for bravery on the battlefield&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[media bullying]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2008&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Media_bullying&amp;amp;oldid=430831 (Apr. 14, 2008)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined by ''Conservapedia'', media bullying is aggressive bias by the media in the attempt to influence a politician or others, typically toward a [[liberal]] goal&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|melting pot&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|a nation that requires &amp;quot;social and cultural assimilation&amp;quot; of immigrants for successful immigration&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Merriam-Webster dictionary (1994)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|memory hole&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a term created by [[George Orwell]] in his classic novel, ''[[1984]]'', to describe the [[censorship|censoring]] of something historical for political reasons&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[meritocracy]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|a system in which the talented are chosen and moved ahead on the basis of their achievement &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[microeconomics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|the study of the economics of the individual person or business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|micromanage&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|insistence on controlling details, typically by liberals to [[censorship|censor]] progress; [[Ronald Reagan]] was critical of this style by [[Democrat]] Presidents&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Midwest conservative&lt;br /&gt;
|2006&lt;br /&gt;
|used initially to describe right-leaning politicians from the Midwest including [[Gerald Ford]] when he passed away, the term captures the mixture of common sense, intellectualism, and [[faith]] that leads the conservative movement from the heartland.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mind control&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for how an atheistic government influences what people believe, especially through public education&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mindset&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|close-minded point-of-view, typically in adherence to a liberal falsehood and often to the exclusion of Christ&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missile defense&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as part of [[SDI]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|mission creep&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|the liberal tendency to incrementally broaden the original goals of an organization or mission; used by Tucker Carlson to describe the defect in the investigation by Robert Mueller of the Trump Administration in 2017&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|missionary&lt;br /&gt;
|1625&lt;br /&gt;
|someone sent on a mission, typically a religious mission&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|mobocracy&lt;br /&gt;
|1754&lt;br /&gt;
|rule by a mob, as at Wikipedia&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|monogamy&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|this has the same date of origin as &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot;, and that may not be a coincidence!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moonlighting&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|working more than a full-time job in order to be as productive as possible; the [[work ethic]] at its best&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moral majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[Jerry Falwell]] to describe the movement of growing moral, Christian conservatives.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|motivation&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe the word did not exist before 1873?!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|moxie&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|determined enthusiasm, initially coined as a trademark for a popular soft drink sold at baseball games and elsewhere&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckety–muck&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for an arrogant person who holds a title or position considered to be important by others&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muckraker&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person who searches out and publicly exposes [[deceit]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/muckraker Merriam-Webster - Muckraker]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Murphy's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|if something can go wrong, then it will go wrong: this was a conservative insight by engineer Edward Murphy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|muscle car&lt;br /&gt;
|1967&lt;br /&gt;
|placing a powerful engine in a classic two-door car for highly efficient performance; the result celebrates masculine style against erosion by feminism&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|myopic&lt;br /&gt;
|1990s&lt;br /&gt;
|originally a term in optometry (1752), 1990's used to describe liberals' lack of foresight&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|namby-pamby&lt;br /&gt;
|1745&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;In 1726, poet Henry Carey first coined this term to ridicule rival poet Ambrose Philips, whose verses were unsophisticated.  The modern meaning of the term developed a bit later.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|weak, indecisive, and, when describing a male group, also effeminate&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|name-dropping&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|a term critical of the [[liberal]] practice of seeking to impress others by casually mentioning personal association with prominent people regardless of relevance to the conversation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nanny state&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;nanny state&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span id&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Under the New Economic Policy, [the new French Prime Minister Raymond] Barre has made it clear that industrial lame ducks can no longer count on the generosity of Nanny i.e. the state - for bailing out.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Leo Ryan, &amp;quot;Economy Shored up: France's new surge of liberalism,&amp;quot; The Globe and Mail (Canada) (Aug. 1, 1978)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Note how two powerful new conservative terms led to a third here!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|negativism&lt;br /&gt;
|1824&lt;br /&gt;
|mental attitude that tends that is skeptical about almost everything, except one's own views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|newspeak&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|political or media expressions using [[circumlocution]] and [[euphemism]]s to disguise or distract from the truth; first coined by [[George Orwell]] in ''[[1984]]''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|neopopulism&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|a form of populism that is [[conservative]], as articulated by the book ''Neopopulism as Counterculture''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;By Thomas Dahlberg and Erick Kaardal (Vision Series: 2012).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In a somewhat different way, the populism-based election of [[Donald Trump]] was also a conservative neopopulism.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|noel&lt;br /&gt;
|1811&lt;br /&gt;
|a Christmas carol or, when capitalized, Christmas itself&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-justiciable&lt;br /&gt;
|1922&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Used by the state attorneys for West Virginia (including Philip Steptoe, founder of Steptoe &amp;amp; Johnson) in ''Pennsylvania v. West Virginia'', 262 U.S. 553 (1923):  &amp;quot;It is not the 'subject of judicial cognizance,' Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 15; Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S 1, 15; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, or 'susceptible of judicial solution.' Louisiana v. Texas, 176 U.S. 1, 18, 22; Missouri v. Illinois, 180 U.S. 208, 233, 234.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a difficult issue that the courts should not attempt to resolve, often because it is too political in nature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|non-locality&lt;br /&gt;
|1920s&lt;br /&gt;
|[[action at a distance]] at the atomic level; even though proven, it is still opposed by those who believe in [[relativity]] and still not recognized by Merriam-Webster&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nonstarter&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|an idea—typically a [[liberal]] one—that has no possibility of being productive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nonstarter&lt;br /&gt;
|1902&lt;br /&gt;
|an idea—typically a [[liberal]] one—that has no possibility of being productive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nothingburger&lt;br /&gt;
|1953&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First attributed use is by [[Hollywood]] gossip columnist Louella Parsons, who used the term to disparage minor celebrities.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|A useful term in deflating persons or theories, as in [[Leftist]] conspiracy theories and politicians.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|nullification&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&lt;br /&gt;
|assertion of authority by a State against encroachment by the federal government, in defense of liberty&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|obstructionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1879&lt;br /&gt;
|deliberate interference with free speech or legislative progress, as when liberal legislators (the &amp;quot;fleebaggers&amp;quot;) fled Wisconsin to try to block a reform&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|off the grid&lt;br /&gt;
|1978&lt;br /&gt;
|self-sufficiency independent of public utilities for electricity and municipalities for water&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Old Glory&lt;br /&gt;
|1862&lt;br /&gt;
|a poetic name for the ''United States of America'' flag, as is Stars &amp;amp; Stripes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-size-fits-all&lt;br /&gt;
|1996&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Was there an earlier conservative use?  Frank Zappa's album cover in the 1970s does not count!&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Lee Wishing, director of communications for conservative [[Grove City College]], in criticism of how the government administers student loans: &amp;quot;Unfortunately, with government programs, it's one size fits all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/dec96/er-dec96.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The 2008 Republican platform states, &amp;quot;We reject a one-size-fits-all approach and support parental options, including home schooling, and local innovations such as schools or classes for boys only or for girls only and alternative and innovative school schedules.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://platform.gop.com/2008Platform.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|one-trick pony&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or group that relies repeatedly on the same gimmick, as in &amp;quot;the media are a one-trick pony in their criticism of [[Rand Paul]]&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|open-minded&lt;br /&gt;
|1828&lt;br /&gt;
|see [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[opportunity cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|optimism&lt;br /&gt;
|1759&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ordered pair&lt;br /&gt;
|1870s&lt;br /&gt;
|developed by the [[Christian]] [[Georg Cantor]], this [[conservative]] concept was part of the [[set theory]] that he invented and revolutionized mathematics with, despite opposition by the establishment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|organic food&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|a grassroots conservative response, led by mom-and-pop consumers and pharmacies, against government-approved pesticides and mandatory fluoridation&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1985&lt;br /&gt;
|taken from original intent, The belief that the United States Constitution should be interpreted in the way the authors originally intended it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|originality&lt;br /&gt;
|1742&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Liberals]] not only lack originality, but (like Justice [[Hugo Black]]) are often hostile to its possibility.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Orwellian&lt;br /&gt;
|1960s&lt;br /&gt;
|terminology or style that advances the power of big government but is hurtful or nonsensical&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ntu.org/main/press.php?PressID=604&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ostensibly&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|having an outward appearance that may not reflect the underlying truth; good potential use is Luke 3:23 in describing Jesus as the son of Joseph&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|outflank&lt;br /&gt;
|1765&lt;br /&gt;
|to move swiftly around an opponent, a military tactic mastered by [[conservative]] [[General]] [[George Patton]] to crush the [[Germans]] in [[World War II]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|overthink&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;started its sharp increase in usage in this year&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|to think so much about a problem or issue as to miss more advantageous, simpler approaches.  Sample usage: [[Donald Trump]]'s successful style illustrated that his rivals were overthinking politics.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pack heat&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|carry a concealed firearm, allowed by permit in nearly every state, yet liberal bias has made dictionaries slow to recognize this term&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parenting&lt;br /&gt;
|1958&lt;br /&gt;
|children raising&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Parkinson's Law&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|how bureaucracies expand regardless of the productivity, and how inefficient work expands to fill the time available for its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|parochial school&lt;br /&gt;
|1755&lt;br /&gt;
|a donation-supported, religious alternative to the mistake of [[public schools]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Parthian shot]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a negative term for the tactic of expressing a criticism while one exits, just as the ancient Parthians would shoot arrows while retreating in battle.  This tactic is common among those who reject [[conservative]] truths, as seen when left-leaning editors leave ''Conservapedia''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[partial-birth abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Used by congressman Charles Canady to name the &amp;quot;Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act&amp;quot; to prohibit the horrific procedure.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a hideous &amp;quot;dilation and extraction&amp;quot; [[abortion]] late in pregnancy that dismembers the child and punctures his head&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|passive-aggressive&lt;br /&gt;
|1946&lt;br /&gt;
|aggressively obstinate by failing to act, as [[liberals]] are in refusing to read the [[Bible]] with an open mind&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[patent troll]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|a company that obtains or buys up patents for the sole purpose of asserting infringement claims, and without any intention of actually manufacturing the invention; the term was first coined by Peter Detkin, in-house counsel to Intel&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|patriotism&lt;br /&gt;
|1726&lt;br /&gt;
|the concept of being willing to serve one's nation under any circumstances, especially when defending it against outside opponents&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pavlovian&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|a conditioned, automatic and unthinking response to a signal; it has been used twice by [[conservative]] Supreme Court Justices. &amp;quot;It is well established that this Court does not, or at least should not, respond in Pavlovian fashion to confessions of error by the [[Solicitor General]].&amp;quot;  ''De Marco v. United States'', 415 U.S. 449, 451 (1974) ([[Rehnquist]], J., dissenting); &amp;quot;'[[Incorporation doctrine|Incorporation]]' has become so Pavlovian that my Brother BLACK barely mentions the [[Fourteenth Amendment]] in the course of an 11-page opinion dealing with the procedural rule the State of [[Florida]] has adopted for cases tried in Florida courts under Florida's criminal laws.&amp;quot; '' Williams v. Fla.'', 399 U.S. 78, 144 (1970) ([[Potter Stewart|Stewart]], J., dissenting and concurring).&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pejorative&lt;br /&gt;
|1882&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that has negative connotations in describing something, which the [[liberal media]] use while pretending that the term is neutral, such as &amp;quot;nativism&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;isolationism&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perestroika&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|increasing economic freedom and free speech under [[communism]], which led to the unraveling of the [[communist]] [[Soviet Union]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|perpetual war&lt;br /&gt;
|1947&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined by historian Charles A. Beard,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles A. Beard is best known for interpreting the Constitution as being primarily motivated by economic interests.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it has been used most recently by [[Ann Coulter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[personhood]] &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/personhood Personhood] Dictionary.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&lt;br /&gt;
|Inherent rights guaranteed to all human beings from the beginning of their biological development, including the pre-born, partially born. Also, the state or fact of being a person.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Philadelphia&lt;br /&gt;
|1682&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[William Penn]] and meaning &amp;quot;city of brotherly love,&amp;quot; the concept captures the &amp;quot;[[best of the public]]&amp;quot; approach&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[phonics]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1684&lt;br /&gt;
|conservatives have long championed phonics to promote literacy, Bible-reading, and informed voters; liberals take the opposite position&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|phony&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This surprisingly recent origin appears to be derived from a British confidence game.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|needed to address [[liberal deceit]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[photo bias]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;A letter to the editor by a reader of the [[liberal]] ''[[Chicago Tribune]]'' observed, &amp;quot;This is the third time in recent weeks that a weird or disfigured picture of Mr. Quayle has appeared in your Sunday paper.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a common trick of the [[liberal media]] to push the reader to the political left on an issue, as in displaying a man without teeth as an opponent of a liberal bill or candidate.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pickwickian&lt;br /&gt;
|1836&lt;br /&gt;
|a simple and generous quality, usually a person in the mold of Samuel Pickwick, a character in [[Charles Dickens]]' ''Pickwick Papers''&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pie in the sky]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1911&lt;br /&gt;
|an unrealistic claim of value about a future [[materialism|materialistic]] benefit&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|piece of cake&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|Sample usage: with church and the [[Bible]], life can be a piece of cake, but without [[Christ]] it can be very difficult&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|plandemic&lt;br /&gt;
|2020&lt;br /&gt;
|politically motivated hysteria over a pandemic, in order to advance [[Leftist]] goals such as mail-in voting and increased government control&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|plasticity&lt;br /&gt;
|1783&lt;br /&gt;
|having a plastic quality that conforms to molding or pressure; in pejorative usage, someone who easily conforms to [[peer pressure]] or [[liberal]] falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|play in Peoria&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|a saying in defiance of the [[liberal media]]-dominated culture on the coasts, first used in this way by President [[Richard Nixon]]'s aide [[John D. Ehrlichman]] in response to the press: &amp;quot;Don't worry, it'll play in Peoria.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scheetz, George H. &amp;quot;Peoria.&amp;quot; In Place Names in the Midwestern United States. Edited by Edward Callary. (Studies in Onomastices; 1.) Mellen Press, 2000. ISBN 0-7734-7723-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|poetic justice&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&lt;br /&gt;
|when virtue is rewarded and/or wrongdoing is punished in an indirect or unexpected way&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|point of order&lt;br /&gt;
|1745&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thefreedictionary.com/point+of+order Free dictionary gives a range of 1745-1755 for first usage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|an objection to how a proceeding or discussion is being conducted, typically in opposition to [[liberal style]] and bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[political capital]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2004&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President [[George W. Bush]] after he won reelection and declared that he would &amp;quot;spend&amp;quot; the political capital by implementing his agenda&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|political machine&lt;br /&gt;
|1905&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term for local and typically Democratic power structures that prevent outsiders from winning elections; first used by George Washington Plunkitt to criticize the Tammany Hall machine for which he served&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[politically correct]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1983&lt;br /&gt;
|This term originated among radicals at the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] to enforce radical orthodoxy, but immediately flipped in usage to become a term of mockery of radicals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;For an early different usage of the word, see 1793 J. WILSON in U.S. Rep. (U.S. Supreme Court) 2 (1798) 462 Sentiments and expressions of this inaccurate kind prevail in our..language... ‘The United States’, instead of the ‘People of the United States’, is the toast given. This is not politically correct.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The term may have come from Chairman Mao in 1936.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politicize&lt;br /&gt;
|1846&lt;br /&gt;
|seeking political gain at the expense of truth or quality&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Merriam-Webster definition (1994 ed.) is incomplete and unclear: &amp;quot;to give a political tone or character to&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|politics of envy&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|used by Australian [[conservative]] Christopher Pine to describe the philosophy behind taking money from private schools and giving it to public ones.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Pollyanna&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|a very optimistic, cheerful, and exuberant person who lights up the world around her; the main character in the best-selling children's book by that name written by Eleanor H. Porter (published in 1913)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|portability&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|the degree to which something—particularly software—may be easily moved with minimal expense from one technology platform to another; parables are effective because of their portability among languages&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pork barrel&lt;br /&gt;
|1909&lt;br /&gt;
|government as a source of handouts that redistribute money from hard-working people to those who avoid work&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[post-abortive]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1986&lt;br /&gt;
|the unexpected trauma and physical harm—which can worsen over time—that is experienced by a woman after having an [[abortion]]; coined by Dr. Kaye Cash in an editorial describing what she learned during a 365-mile walk in southeast Arkansas to speak with the public about abortion&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Editorial by Kaye Cash, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock, AR), October 23, 1986.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Potemkin village&lt;br /&gt;
|1935&lt;br /&gt;
|a phony facade designed to distract the public from a disgraceful condition, typically used to describe deception by government against the people&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|potential&lt;br /&gt;
|1817&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Usage here refers to &amp;quot;promise&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;possibility&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pothead&lt;br /&gt;
|1959&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who smokes marijuana and doesn't realize its longterm negative psychological effects&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|powerhouse&lt;br /&gt;
|1881&lt;br /&gt;
|source of energy and strength - which is what the conservative movement is&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[price discrimination]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|charging different prices for exactly the same service or good; first coined by the British economist (and critic of [[John Maynard Keynes]]) Arthur Cecil Pigou in ''The Economics of Welfare''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[price fixing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|the setting of prices in interference of the [[free market]]; it is illegal for private companies to do this, but government itself sometimes does it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|prioritize&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|to recognize that some goals and activities are more important than others, and then focus accordingly&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|private sector&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|non-governmental businesses and jobs functioning in free enterprise&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|privatize&lt;br /&gt;
|1940&lt;br /&gt;
|to return a business or enterprise from state to private control; to de-nationalize.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive&lt;br /&gt;
|1933&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Procrustean&lt;br /&gt;
|1832&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative description of the one-size-fits-all mentality, which disregards individual differences&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productive&lt;br /&gt;
|1612&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|productivity&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|the gap of about 200 years between the creation of &amp;quot;productive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;productivity&amp;quot; is astounding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[pro-life]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1960&lt;br /&gt;
|describes one who supports women going through with having children rather than killing them in the womb&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|property right&lt;br /&gt;
|1853&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|provocateur&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who spends more time causing unproductive conflicts rather than advancing knowledge, accomplishing legitimate goals, or helping anyone&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|pseudoscience&lt;br /&gt;
|1844&lt;br /&gt;
|worthless claims written with the appearance of scientific rigor to gain an aura of credibility&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|public charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1880&lt;br /&gt;
|an official term used by the government to describe someone who depends on payments from government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|publicity stunt&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Earlier usage in the 1900s may have occurred, but the term &amp;quot;stunt&amp;quot; was not coined until 1878.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Used on April 10, 1969 by Republican Senators who withdrew from a tour and probe by Senator [[Ted Kennedy]], criticizing him for his &amp;quot;publicity stunt&amp;quot; in preparation for his expected run for the presidency; the [[Chappaquiddick incident]] sunk his chances three months later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|puff piece&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|a biased story by the [[lamestream media]] to promote someone who shares their [[Leftist]] views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|punctual&lt;br /&gt;
|1675&lt;br /&gt;
|consistently showing up on time, rather than a disrespectful tardiness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|quantify&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|race card&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is the date of its widespread familiarity.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Playing the race card&amp;quot; consists of relying on racial emotions or charges of racism in order to overcome the truth and logic in politics, legal proceedings, or otherwise; this term became familiar in the criticism of the defense and acquittal of O.J. Simpson for the murder of his ex-wife and her friend.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reasonable doubt&lt;br /&gt;
|1770&lt;br /&gt;
|a Christian concept for the benefit of the souls of jurors, not the accused; first used in English by [[John Adams]] (before that, in [[canon law]]) in addressing the jury during his defense of the Boston Massacre perpetrators:  &amp;quot;Where you are doubtful never act: that is, if you doubt of the  prisoner's guilt, never declare him guilty; that is always the rule, especially in cases of life.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&amp;amp;context=fss_papers&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rapture&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|spiritual ecstasy [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rapture]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[recidivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1886&lt;br /&gt;
|the tendency for people lacking in [[faith]] and determination to revert to prior patterns of harmful behavior, such as repeat criminal offenders&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|recuse&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|self-removal by a decision-maker (especially a judge) because of possible bias with respect to the pending issue&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|red tape&lt;br /&gt;
|1736&lt;br /&gt;
|excessive bureaucracy and procedural complexity which frustrate meaningful activity and progress&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|refudiate&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|combination of ''refute'' and ''repudiate'', as coined by [[Sarah Palin]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[relativism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|the view that ethical truths are not absolute, but depend on the person or group that holds them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[responsibility]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1737&lt;br /&gt;
|the state of having a duty to do something, or being accountable or blamable for something; HAMILTON Federalist No. 63 (1988) II. 193 Responsibility in order to be reasonable must be limited to objects within the power of the responsible party.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rethink&lt;br /&gt;
|1700&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Date of origin given by the 10th Edition of the ''Merriam-Webster'' dictionary; its online dictionary has an earlier date.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|to reconsider, a sign of [[Essay:Quantifying Openmindedness|openmindedness]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|reverse discrimination&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|the use of quotas or affirmative action to use race or gender to discriminate against a better qualified person&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revisionism&lt;br /&gt;
|1903&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The first use of this term, now obscure, refers to a Marxist movement that preferred evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|distortions of history to promote liberal bias&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|revolving-door&lt;br /&gt;
|1973&lt;br /&gt;
|the liberal practice of repeatedly transferring into and out of government in a way that impedes progress and access by others, like the same people going round-and-round in a real revolving door&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|right-of-way&lt;br /&gt;
|1768&lt;br /&gt;
|a right to pass through, other rights notwithstanding&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[RINO]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1992&lt;br /&gt;
|First known use in print: &amp;quot;[[Bill Clinton]] would have been proud .... The [[Republican]]s were moving out and the [[Democrat]]s and 'RINOs' (Republicans In Name Only) were moving in.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John DiStaso in the [[conservative]] ''New Hampshire Union Leader'', in December 1992 shortly after Clinton's election.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[RINO Backer]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2012&lt;br /&gt;
|a more important term than &amp;quot;RINO&amp;quot;, because what matters most is whether someone will stand up for a [[conservative]] position and candidate when the [[liberal media]] demand that everyone flock to the liberal side.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|riot act&lt;br /&gt;
|1715&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its colloquial use, as in &amp;quot;read them the riot act,&amp;quot; began in 1819.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the Riot Act was a law passed in England in 1715 to authorize officials to disperse riots&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|risk averse&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Its first use in a published law review article or court decision was in ''Joint Committees as an Alternative Form of Arbitration Under the NLRA'', 47 Tul. L. Rev. 325 (Feb. 1973).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|the antidote to [[gambling]], being risk averse attains the immense benefits that result from minimizing [[uncertainty]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rock of Gibraltar&lt;br /&gt;
|1776&lt;br /&gt;
|unwavering strength amid adversity&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Rogue state&lt;br /&gt;
|1993&lt;br /&gt;
|(Originally used in 1993 then reintroduced in 2002.) A 'rogue state' displays no regard for international law. It attempts to acquire weapons of mass destruction and other military technology with which to threaten neighbouring countries and support terrorism. Rogue states often reject human values and brutalize their own people.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|role model&lt;br /&gt;
|1957&lt;br /&gt;
|someone, such as a parent, teacher, athlete, statesman, or any walk of life, who inspires others by their everyday conduct&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rubber-stamp&lt;br /&gt;
|1918&lt;br /&gt;
|unthinking repetition or endorsement of something, despite having the responsibility to make an independent decision, as in &amp;quot;Democrats rubber-stamp demands by the abortion industry.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|rugged&lt;br /&gt;
|1897&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=rugged&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|sample usage: &amp;quot;rugged individualism,&amp;quot; which describes the American character&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|running start&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|taking initiative earlier than required, in order to achieve more&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|run of the mill&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|meaning &amp;quot;merely average, commonplace,&amp;quot; the term is critical of a failure to strive for excellence&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Ruthian&lt;br /&gt;
|1920s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;First used by ''The New York Tribune''. [https://www.lexico.com/definition/ruthian]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a spectacular performance in sports, like a mammoth home run by [[Babe Ruth]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sacred cow&lt;br /&gt;
|1910&lt;br /&gt;
|a person or idea, typically liberal, that becomes immune from criticism because of its political usefulness rather than its truthfulness, as in the theories of [[evolution]] and [[relativity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scam&lt;br /&gt;
|1963&lt;br /&gt;
|a deceptive scheme, which is what most liberal theories are.  Interestingly, the origin of the term &amp;quot;scam&amp;quot; is unknown, but its timing near the beginning of the 1960s is telling.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scapegoating&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|a term criticizing how people, particularly liberals, deflect accountability and blame from themselves to others; inspired by Leviticus 16:8.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|salutary neglect&lt;br /&gt;
|1775&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by the [[conservative]] [[Edmund Burke]] in his 1775 speech to the British [[House of Commons]] entitled &amp;quot;On Moving His Resolutions for Conciliation with the Colonies&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.archive.org/stream/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft/burkesspeechonco00burkuoft_djvu.txt&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|school choice&lt;br /&gt;
|1980&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Milton Friedman]] in his book, ''Free to Choose'' &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|school of hard knocks&lt;br /&gt;
|1912&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;coined by George Ade, a popular Midwestern columnist and author, in his book &amp;quot;Knocking the Neighbors&amp;quot;: [https://archive.org/stream/knockingofneigh00abegrich/knockingofneigh00abegrich_djvu.txt]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|education by difficult, painful experiences&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[scientific fascism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|a coordinated effort by a group of scientists to enforce a certain point of view upon others.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scofflaw&lt;br /&gt;
|1924&lt;br /&gt;
|a word invented by the [[best of the public]] as part of contest to describe people who are contemptuous of laws and repeatedly violate them&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|scrutinize&lt;br /&gt;
|1671&lt;br /&gt;
|its original meaning was to examine votes, and thus prevent [[liberal]] attempts at voter fraud&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[secularism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1850-55&lt;br /&gt;
|attempts to educate, particularly through [[public school]], without including [[faith]] or even acknowledgment of [[God]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Segway&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|Dean Kamen's trademark spelling of &amp;quot;segue&amp;quot; for use of Yankee Ingenuity to improve efficiency, to refer to a form of battery-powered transportation.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[self-defense]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1651&lt;br /&gt;
|The ability to protect oneself against violent assault; weapons, including firearms, may be used for self-defense&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-destruct&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|often the tragic result of liberal falsehoods&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Discipline|self-discipline]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-preservation&lt;br /&gt;
|1614&lt;br /&gt;
|preservation of oneself from destruction or harm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|self-reliant&lt;br /&gt;
|1848&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|shortsighted&lt;br /&gt;
|1649&lt;br /&gt;
|focusing too much on the near-term future, at the expense of the long-term future&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|separation of powers&lt;br /&gt;
|1748&lt;br /&gt;
|the fundamental principle of the [[U.S. Constitution]], separation of powers originated from &amp;quot;The Spirit of the Laws&amp;quot; by the French political philosopher [[Montesquieu]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ncsl.org/research/about-state-legislatures/separation-of-powers.aspx&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Separation of powers establishes checks and balances as a safeguard against the concentration of power.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|shotgun marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|pregnancy =&amp;gt; get married.  Think of someone besides yourself for a change.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|show trial&lt;br /&gt;
|1937&lt;br /&gt;
|trials, especially in communist countries, which have preordained outcomes but are used for propaganda purposes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sidewalk counseling&lt;br /&gt;
|1975&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice of volunteers exercising their right of [[free speech]] to advise women against [[abortion]] as they walk on sidewalks toward abortion clinics; liberals have passed laws to restrict and [[censorship|censor]] this&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[silent majority]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1969&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by President [[Richard Nixon]] in his speech to the nation on Nov. 3, 1969&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://watergate.info/nixon/silent-majority-speech-1969.shtml&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; refers to the large conservative population in America silenced by liberal media&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|silver lining&lt;br /&gt;
|1871&lt;br /&gt;
|a benefit that is not obvious to see, particularly amid a disappointment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|skullduggery&lt;br /&gt;
|1867&lt;br /&gt;
|underhanded or unscrupulous behavior&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|silent majority&lt;br /&gt;
|1955&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;first use was [[British]] but the term was popularized by the Nixon Administration in response to protests against the [[Vietnam War]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a poetic term for those conservative Americans silenced by liberal media despite being greater in numbers; the term is reminder not to give a heckler, a protester, or a vocal minority more deference than they deserve when the silent majority properly opposes their views&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[slippery slope]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900s&lt;br /&gt;
|term has been widely used for decades to expose the fallacy of &amp;quot;it doesn't hurt to try&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|small beer&lt;br /&gt;
|1836&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by [[Davy Crockett]] to signify someone or something having little significance, despite hype typically by [[liberal]]s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|small talk&lt;br /&gt;
|1745&lt;br /&gt;
|inconsequential, shallow conversation that is usually a waste of time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[small town values]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|term was first used by [[Democrat]] [[John Glenn]] in his failed presidential run in 1984, in a futile effort to appear more conservative than [[Ronald Reagan]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke and mirrors&lt;br /&gt;
|1979&lt;br /&gt;
|something intended to disguise or draw attention away from an often embarrassing or unpleasant issue.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.merriam-webster.com/netdict/smoke%20and%20mirrors Smoke and Mirrors, Merriam-Webster]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Widely used during the 1990s to describe [[Bill Clinton]]'s political strategy.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoke-filled room&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|a pejorative term describing how a few political insiders sometimes pick a candidate or make a decision in a secret room (in the old days, filled with cigar smoke)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|smoking gun&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|a law-and-order term, &amp;quot;smoking gun&amp;quot; was first used as figurative term in a reported judicial decision in ''Rodgers v. United States Steel Corp.'', 1975 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12775 (W.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 1975), and many literal uses of the term in court decisions before that!&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soapbox&lt;br /&gt;
|1907&lt;br /&gt;
|staging for a typically liberal, unproductive rant having little substance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soccer mom&lt;br /&gt;
|1987&lt;br /&gt;
|a mother who devotes herself to her children's activities; this is a significant voting bloc or demographic group&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social engineering&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|an increasingly pejorative term for liberal attempts to create a &amp;quot;nanny state&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[socialist]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1827&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who advocates government control over the economy, and particularly state control of the means of production&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|social justice rhetoric&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&lt;br /&gt;
|language and rhetorical ploys equating equality of outcome with justice&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sophomoric&lt;br /&gt;
|1813&lt;br /&gt;
|pretending to know much, when in fact the person knows little and is even immature&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|soul-searching&lt;br /&gt;
|1924&lt;br /&gt;
|personal reflection about one's own values and morality&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sour grapes&lt;br /&gt;
|1760&lt;br /&gt;
|disparagement of something by someone who failed to attain it, rather than admitting his own faults&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Tax-and-spend|spend-and-tax]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2009&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/02/morning-bell-the-obama-tax-and-spend-economy-is-here/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a variation on &amp;quot;tax-and-spend&amp;quot; (see below), &amp;quot;spend-and-tax&amp;quot; consists of spending the money first and then trying to justify raising taxes based on the deficit created by the spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spin doctor&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|someone ensuring that others interpret an event from a particular point of view.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/world/asia/22policy.html?_r=2 General Petraeus describes Axelrod by Bob Woodward]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sportsmanship&lt;br /&gt;
|1745&lt;br /&gt;
|displaying [[chivalry]] in victory or defeat, and recognizing that moral values matter more than a win or a loss&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|spot-on&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|precisely correct, as in a prediction or in overcoming imprecision in a challenging task; its origin is from the military &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|squirrelly&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|like a squirrel; jumpy and unpredictable; as in liberals get squirrelly when confronted with facts.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|squish&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who pretends to be conservative when it is popular, but then caves into [[liberals]] as soon as they start to criticize him&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[stagflation]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1965&lt;br /&gt;
|inflation ''and'' high [[unemployment]] ''and'' stagnant demand by consumers, typically due to [[liberal]] policies as in the late 1970s under President [[Jimmy Carter]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stalking horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1788&lt;br /&gt;
|a candidate or issue that serves to increase the chances that ''another'' will win, as in &amp;quot;antifederalists attempted to win elections by using 'the stalking horse of amendments.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Centinel'', 1788 (quoted in ''The Federalist party in Massachusetts to the year 1800'', By Anson Ely Morse).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[statism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1919&lt;br /&gt;
|advocates for centralized government and government ownership&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Statue of Liberty]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|a phrase used to describe it more than a decade after its completion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|status quo&lt;br /&gt;
|1833&lt;br /&gt;
|a useful baseline for assessing and promoting conservative growth&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stay-at-home&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|typically usage is &amp;quot;stay-at-home mom,&amp;quot; the mainstay of successful, productive family life&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|stem-winder&lt;br /&gt;
|1875&lt;br /&gt;
|first-rate of its kind, especially a political speech; term inspired by the innovation for the watch to be wound by stem rather than by a key&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straightforward&lt;br /&gt;
|1806&lt;br /&gt;
|something liberals are not&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|straw man&lt;br /&gt;
|1896&lt;br /&gt;
|an imaginary argument or example set up for the purpose of easily knocking down, while distracting from valid arguments&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|strategy&lt;br /&gt;
|1810&lt;br /&gt;
|a careful plan or method, the opposite of liberal style&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|street-smart&lt;br /&gt;
|1974&lt;br /&gt;
|the non-bookish intelligence necessary to survive and thrive in an unstructured, rough-and-tumble environment analogous to a tough neighborhood in a big city&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Stupaked&lt;br /&gt;
|2010&lt;br /&gt;
|hurt by someone who reassured everyone he would do the right thing, but then switched at the last minute to do the opposite (refers especially to [[abortion betrayal]]s)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Columnist Kathleen Parker is credited with first coining this term.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[subsidiarity]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1936&lt;br /&gt;
|the concept (opposed by liberals) that responsibilities performed by local or subordinate organizations should not be usurped by centralized government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|sugarcoat&lt;br /&gt;
|1865&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by [[Abraham Lincoln]] to say that secession is a sugarcoated word for rebellion&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|supply-side&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|the economic theory that reducing taxes expands economic activity by encouraging greater earnings and investments; proven successful during the Reagan Administration in the 1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|survivalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&lt;br /&gt;
|one who is determined and prepared to stay alive, and even thrive at minimal living expense, if liberals cause a breakdown of society&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|take-charge&lt;br /&gt;
|1954&lt;br /&gt;
|proactive leadership for the greater good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takeover&lt;br /&gt;
|1917&lt;br /&gt;
|as in the takeover of government by the communist revolution in that year&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|takings&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Marion &amp;amp; R. V. R. Co. v. United States'', 270 U.S. 280, 285 (1926) (the Supreme Court referring for the first time to &amp;quot;takings by eminent domain&amp;quot;)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|use of the power of [[eminent domain]] by government to convert private property to a public use, typically disfavored by the property owner&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tax-and-spend&lt;br /&gt;
|1937 &lt;br /&gt;
|not yet recognized by Merriam-Webster, it is included in dictionary.com and it means the liberal policy of raising taxes and increasing government spending&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|taxpayer&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|the word highlights who is really paying for things&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tea party&lt;br /&gt;
|2007&lt;br /&gt;
|an amorphous group of ordinary citizens unified against a more expansive government&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Tebowing]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2011&lt;br /&gt;
|bending on one knee in public to give glory to God (named after [[pro-life]] [[NFL]] [[quarterback]] [[Tim Tebow]])&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|teetotaler&lt;br /&gt;
|1834&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who does not drink any alcohol, and thereby avoids supporting the alcoholic industry&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[term limits]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1861&lt;br /&gt;
|can you believe this is not in the dictionary yet? Merriam-Webster omits it, but dictionary.com has it&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/term+limit&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|terrorism&lt;br /&gt;
|1795&lt;br /&gt;
|Coined during the French Revolution, refers to any form of spontaneous extreme violence, mainly committed by Muslims in modern times&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[textualism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|first used by Justice [[Robert Jackson]] in his influential concurrence in ''[[Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer]]'', 343 U.S. 579 (1952), it now describes the legal philosophy of Justice [[Antonin Scalia]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Thanksgiving Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1674&lt;br /&gt;
|a tradition older than the [[United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[think tank]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1940s&lt;br /&gt;
|first coined in [[Britain]] to describe intelligence organizations that helped the military, think tanks became part of the rise of conservatism in the 1970s and 1980s; is ''Conservapedia'' the think tank of the future?&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|thought police&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|“The most gifted of [the public], who might possibly become a nuclei of discontent, are simply marked down by the Thought Police and eliminated.” - George Orwell, ''1984''.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|time sink&lt;br /&gt;
|1991&lt;br /&gt;
|this term originated at [[MIT]] to describe a programming class which consumed enormous amounts of students' time&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|time-tested&lt;br /&gt;
|1930&lt;br /&gt;
|an approach that has proven to be beneficial over time, like heterosexual marriage&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|toady&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|an insincere sycophant seeking personal gain, as in &amp;quot;toadies to the [[liberal agenda]] far outnumber its true believers&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|top-notch&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&lt;br /&gt;
|the highest quality, which requires respect for merit to recognize&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tort reform&lt;br /&gt;
|1970&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://faculty.lls.edu/workshops/documents/nockleby.pdf (citing the late 1960s and 1970s for the beginning of the movement)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a movement placing sensible limits on runaway liberal lawsuits&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1926&lt;br /&gt;
|term which identifies the similarities of fascist and communist regimes and ideologies and urges resistance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tour de force&lt;br /&gt;
|1802&lt;br /&gt;
|a feat of skill&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trademark&lt;br /&gt;
|1838&lt;br /&gt;
|extends the concept of private property to the marks used by business&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|traditionalist&lt;br /&gt;
|1856&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;adherence to the doctrines or practices of a tradition...the beliefs of those opposed to modernism, liberalism, or radicalism&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/traditionalist&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transaction cost]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1961&lt;br /&gt;
|Economist [[Ronald Coase]] won a [[Nobel Prize]] for this.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[transistor]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1948&lt;br /&gt;
|named by John R. Pierce and developed at the [[conservative]] [[Bell Labs]], this invention epitomized Yankee ingenuity; Pierce was a critic of claims of [[artificial intelligence]] and was the future developer of Telstar, a precursor to the [[Strategic Defense Initiative]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|transparency&lt;br /&gt;
|1615&lt;br /&gt;
|allowing people who are affected by decisions to see how and why those decisions are really being made.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|tree huggers&lt;br /&gt;
|1970s&lt;br /&gt;
|still not recognized by the dictionary, this term criticizes extreme environmentalists, but they proudly use the term also to describe what they literally do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trivia&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&lt;br /&gt;
|insignificant detail, which can sometimes obscure what is important and distract people from the Bible; liberal [[Wikipedia]] is filled with trivial junk&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Trojan horse&lt;br /&gt;
|1837&lt;br /&gt;
|describes a type of liberal [[deceit]]:  subversion from within&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Trump Derangement Syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2017&lt;br /&gt;
|an irrational, hysterical opposition to President [[Donald Trump]] simply because he is Donald Trump&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Trump effect]]&lt;br /&gt;
|2016&lt;br /&gt;
|based on the leadership of [[Donald Trump]], voluntary decisions by American companies to keep manufacturing jobs in the [[United States]] rather than move them offshore&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|trust but verify&lt;br /&gt;
|1980s&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President Ronald Reagan as the approach to use towards communist [[deceit]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|two-party system&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|a system of government and politics in which two political parties of roughly comparable strength dominate, as in the [[United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|typewriter&lt;br /&gt;
|1829&lt;br /&gt;
|invented by a homeschooled American, used to better spread conservative ideas&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ugly duckling&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|an unpromising appearance but often with great unseen potential&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|ultra vires&lt;br /&gt;
|1793&lt;br /&gt;
|beyond the authority, especially of a government or corporate official&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|un-American&lt;br /&gt;
|1818&lt;br /&gt;
|contrary to American values&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unborn child&lt;br /&gt;
|1791&lt;br /&gt;
|the rights of the unborn child have been recognized in English law since the 1600s, but the specific term &amp;quot;unborn child&amp;quot; itself may have been first used by an attorney arguing before the New Jersey Supreme Court in ''Den v. Sparks'', 1 N.J.L. 67 (Sup. Ct. 1791)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|uncertainty principle&lt;br /&gt;
|1929&lt;br /&gt;
|an underlying chaos (uncertainty) at the atomic level in the physical world after the [[Fall of man]], which renders a [[perpetual motion machine]] and life beyond 120 years impossible&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underachiever&lt;br /&gt;
|1952&lt;br /&gt;
|a typically liberal person who fails to accomplish what he could&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underdog&lt;br /&gt;
|1859&lt;br /&gt;
|[[David]] v. [[Goliath]], [[Cinderella]], [[best of the public]], etc.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[underemployed]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1908&lt;br /&gt;
|having less than full-time or suitable employment&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underwater basket weaving&lt;br /&gt;
|1950s&lt;br /&gt;
|A pejorative that describes worthless college courses and a declining educational system; see [[Worst College Majors]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|underwhelm&lt;br /&gt;
|1949&lt;br /&gt;
|a great word for beating back [[liberal]] hype&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unforced error&lt;br /&gt;
|1995&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christine Wallace, &amp;quot;Coalition needs a new partner,&amp;quot; ''Australian Financial Review'' p. 17 (May 15, 1995) (&amp;quot;John Howard's unforced error in a pre-recorded interview [was] to tell ABC-TV's Paul Lyneham that things would only be 'cooking with gas' if variable mortgage rates began to fall, when precisely that happened in between recording the interview and it going to air, [and this] is a gift to Labor with an election in sight ....&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
|incorporated into politics from tennis, this term means an unnecessary mistake that was not caused by a difficult question or conduct by the other side.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unscripted&lt;br /&gt;
|1950&lt;br /&gt;
|speaking sincerely without parroting a script; &amp;quot;[[Rand Paul]] and [[Chris Christie]] are effective because, unlike [[Obama]], they are unscripted.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|unsung hero&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who accomplishes good without receiving recognition for it&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|useful idiot&lt;br /&gt;
|1920&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=135140 Attributed originally to Lenin], but since used by others like [[Nobel Prize]] winner (Literature) Doris Lessing to describe how she was manipulated by the [[communists]]: “I was taken around and shown things as a ‘useful idiot’... that’s what my role was. I can’t understand why I was so gullible.” [https://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2010/07/100624_doc_useful_idiots_lenin.shtml]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Sample usage:  &amp;quot;There are not as many useful idiots on college campuses for the Obama reelection campaign in 2012 as there were in 2008, and it's doubtful he can fill a stadium rally unless the campaign pays students to attend.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vaccine police&lt;br /&gt;
|1999&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by Phyllis Schlafly as first cited by the media in a front-page ''Philadelphia Inquirer'' article, which quoted her for saying &amp;quot;that the 'vaccine police' want to deny American parents the right of informed consent to vaccines and that the personal immunization records kept by states are the first step toward 'compulsory control of individual health care.'&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Huntly Collins, &amp;quot;LIFE GIVER OR LIFE TAKER: A DEBATE ON THE VALUE OF VACCINES, SPECIAL REPORT, IMMUNIZATIONS: A PUBLIC-HEALTH STAPLE COMES UNDER SIEGE,&amp;quot; ''Philadelphia Inquirer'' A1 (Oct. 3, 1999).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vacuous&lt;br /&gt;
|1850s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This word as a prior date of origin for its physical meaning.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|lacking any insight or depth of thought - common among [[liberal claptrap]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vandalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1798&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;From the French word &amp;quot;vandalisme&amp;quot;, first seen in print there in 1794 by the Bishop of Blois, Henri Grégoire, to criticize the senseless destruction of fine art during the [[French Revolution]]. [http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2015/07/origin-word-vandalism/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|malicious destruction of someone else's property&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vaporware&lt;br /&gt;
|1984&lt;br /&gt;
|a new computer program that is not really available as hyped in the media; see also the parable of the two sons at Matthew 21:28-32&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|venture capital&lt;br /&gt;
|1943&lt;br /&gt;
|capitalism at its best: funding new and risky enterprises to create wealth for many&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veracity&lt;br /&gt;
|1623&lt;br /&gt;
|devotion to truthfulness&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|vet&lt;br /&gt;
|1904&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.slate.com/id/2199254/?from=rss&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a verb meaning to screen for flaws&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|veto&lt;br /&gt;
|1629&lt;br /&gt;
|a power by one branch of government to restrain another branch, and thereby attain less government overall&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[victimization]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1840&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|volunteer&lt;br /&gt;
|1618&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who freely offers to help&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wannabe&lt;br /&gt;
|1981&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that criticizes liberal [[status worship]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|War on Terror&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&lt;br /&gt;
|no listing at Merriam-Webster; on February 2, 2009 (less than two weeks after inauguration), Obama dropped use of this term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://pewforum.org/news/display.php?NewsID=17455 Obama administration drops 'war on terror' phrase] Pew Forum, February 2, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|washed-up&lt;br /&gt;
|1928&lt;br /&gt;
|no longer productive, as in &amp;quot;the washed-up liberal professor has not contributed anything to his field in 30 years.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wasteland&lt;br /&gt;
|1825&lt;br /&gt;
|first figurative use was in 1868; [[T.S. Eliot]] wrote poem with this title (as two words) in 1922.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.etymonline.com/word/wasteland&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Fits perfectly the meaning conveyed in the &amp;quot;kingdom divided&amp;quot; teaching in [[Matthew 10-19 (Translated)#12:25|Matthew 12:25]].&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|waterloo&lt;br /&gt;
|1816&lt;br /&gt;
|a final defeat or setback, coined merely one year after the [[English]] defeated [[Napoleon]] at the [[Battle of Waterloo]]; there has never been a &amp;quot;waterloo&amp;quot; for [[Christianity]] or [[conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|weasel word&lt;br /&gt;
|1900&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.unz.org/Pub/Century-1900jun-00304 The Stained-Glass Political Platform, by Stewart Chaplin (1900)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a word that is not conservative and which avoids being direct or substantive; named after the weasel's habits as criticized by [[Shakespeare]] in ''Henry V'' and ''As You Like It''. &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Welfare queen]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1976&lt;br /&gt;
|a disparaging term for someone who collects excessive welfare payments through fraud, manipulation, or laziness. First used by [[Ronald Reagan]] during his 1976 Presidential campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|welfare state&lt;br /&gt;
|1941&lt;br /&gt;
|a government that views its primary responsibility to be to give handouts to individuals to make sure they have what they need&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|white elephant&lt;br /&gt;
|1860&lt;br /&gt;
|an oversized building that is worth less than its high costs of maintenance&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wildcatter&lt;br /&gt;
|1883&lt;br /&gt;
|a pro-energy term that describes someone who drills for oil in fields not known to have oil&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wishful thinking&lt;br /&gt;
|1925&lt;br /&gt;
|in [[liberal denial]] of [[evil]] and the [[devil]], [[liberals]] engage in unjustified wishful thinking&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wishy-washy&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;An archaic meaning of poor quality dates to 1690.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|easily changing in opinion, usually due to peer pressure&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|woman's intuition&lt;br /&gt;
|1890&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Notice how this predates the modern [[feminists]], who would tend to consider this term [[politically incorrect]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|a perception more common in women that something or someone is to be avoided without yet understanding why.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|word poverty&lt;br /&gt;
|2001&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.aft.org/pubs-reports/american_educator/summer2001/lang_gap_moats.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|popularized by President [[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|wordsmith&lt;br /&gt;
|1873&lt;br /&gt;
|someone who seeks to use language effectively, as many conservatives strive to do&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work (physical sense)&lt;br /&gt;
|1826&lt;br /&gt;
|a physical measure&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Work equals force times distance.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of effort used to increase energy&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|work ethic&lt;br /&gt;
|1951&lt;br /&gt;
|a habit of working as a moral good&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|workaholic&lt;br /&gt;
|1968&lt;br /&gt;
|coined by a Southern Baptist pastor to describe the work habits of himself and other ministers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/02/magazine/the-lives-they-lived-on-language-wordplayers.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|worldview&lt;br /&gt;
|1858&lt;br /&gt;
|a comprehensive way of looking at life and the world; sometimes used to criticize a liberal's irrational belief system&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee&lt;br /&gt;
|1758   &lt;br /&gt;
|Inhabitants of New England, United States. Dutch slang in 1698- Americanized 50 years later.&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|Yankee Ingenuity&lt;br /&gt;
|1761&lt;br /&gt;
|America's inhabitants had a knack for clever design and capitalist success. The early Americans had applied their exceptional skills prior to the terms existence, see [[Eli Whitney]] and [[Benjamin Franklin]]. &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|yellow journalism&lt;br /&gt;
|1898&lt;br /&gt;
|the practice, started by newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and his rival William Randolph Hearst, of sensationalizing and biasing newspaper headlines and articles in order to influence public opinion&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|yes-man&lt;br /&gt;
|1913&lt;br /&gt;
|someone, often a [[liberal]], who agrees (and votes) as he is told&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|Young Turk&lt;br /&gt;
|1908&lt;br /&gt;
|an idealistic young man who seeks significant political change by defeating the [[Establishment]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|zero-sum&lt;br /&gt;
|1944&lt;br /&gt;
|activities or political approaches in which a gain can only be achieved at a corresponding loss to someone else.  For example, Facebook revenue is &amp;quot;zero-sum&amp;quot; because it results from users wasting their time (or ruining their marriages); reading or translating the [[Bible]] is not zero-sum.&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|[[ziggurat]]&lt;br /&gt;
|1877&lt;br /&gt;
|an ancient house of worship first constructed by the Mesopotamian civilization; predicted by [[Biblical scientific foreknowledge]] in the story of the [[Tower of Babel]], the existence of the ziggurats were unknown to the Western world throughout most of history&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &amp;lt;!--Do not remove this. We want to keep insights on the first screen of viewing--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ Merriam-Webster dictionary]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dictionary.reference.com/ Dictionary.com]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Essay:Best New Conservative Words&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Words Not Yet Recognized by the Dictionary‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Downgraded Conservative Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:New Liberal Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Surprising Dates of Origin for Terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Linguistic Analysis of Candidates]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative Bible Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:Conservapedia's Law]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Secularized Language‎]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Terms Difficult to Classify]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Language]]: [[Etymology]], [[Vocabulary]], [[Word]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Linguistics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Language]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservatism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Conservapedia}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Chess]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Essays about Conservatism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Glossaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Lists]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Best New Conservative Words}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservatrump&amp;diff=1733522</id>
		<title>User talk:Conservatrump</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservatrump&amp;diff=1733522"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T23:07:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi guy! You need to cite your sources. Thanks! [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:28, 23 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*: I think I have, thank you! [[User:Conservatrump|Conservatrump]] ([[User talk:Conservatrump|talk]]) 17:42, 23 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
::Not on your two mainspace edits. [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:47, 23 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
:: Ok, I think I did it. Thank you! [[User:Conservatrump|Conservatrump]] ([[User talk:Conservatrump|talk]]) 18:07, 23 February 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Arnold_Schwarzenegger&amp;diff=1733521</id>
		<title>Arnold Schwarzenegger</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Arnold_Schwarzenegger&amp;diff=1733521"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T23:06:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Arnold Schwarzenegger&lt;br /&gt;
|image=About arnold img-2.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Maria Shriver]] (separated)&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Roman Catholic]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=California&lt;br /&gt;
        |number=38th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=November 17, 2003 - January 3, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
        |preceded=[[Gray Davis]]&lt;br /&gt;
        |succeeded=[[Jerry Brown]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger''' (b. [[Graz]], [[Austria]] 1947) is an [[Austria]]n-[[United States of America|American]] actor, politician, [[steroid]]-enhanced [[bodybuilding|bodybuilder]], and businessman, who served as the 38th [[Governor]] of [[California]] from 2003 to 2011.  [[Anti-Trump]], Schwarzenegger unsuccessfully replaced [[Donald Trump]] on ''The Apprentice'', resulting in a ratings collapse of that show.  More recently Schwarzenegger has devoted himself to nonpartisan [[redistricting]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/bill-whalen/article138898898.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Acting career==&lt;br /&gt;
Schwarzenegger rose to fame with action movies including Commando, Conan the Barbarian and the Terminator franchise. His on-screen presence was characterized by his large stature, as well as his thick Austrian accent. Once one of the highest paid actors in [[Hollywood]], Schwarzenegger has recently returned to acting, following the end of his term as Governor.&lt;br /&gt;
==Recall Election==&lt;br /&gt;
After sitting Governor [[Gray Davis]] mismanaged electric power deregulation and instituted a new registration tax by [[executive order]], infuriated citizens initiated a petition to place a measure on the ballot to remove him from office. Despite [[Democratic]] predictions that the petition would fail, it was delivered to then Secretary of State Kevin Shelley with more than the required number of signatures. In accordance with the law, Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante became Acting Governor and called a special election for October 7, 2003. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The election was only the second of its kind in United States history. Approximately 180 citizens, from all walks of life, declared candidacy. Schwarzenegger was rumored to be considering a run for office, which was confirmed on an appearance on the NBC TV [[Tonight Show]]. Schwarzenegger easily defeated Cruz Bustamante in the election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the election was over, Schwarzenegger was sworn in on November 17, 2003, to serve the remainder of Davis' term. Despite a period of sagging poll numbers, Schwarzenegger was reelected by a landslide on November 7, 2006. He defeated Democrat Phil Angelides, the then-State Treasurer of California.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
Despite being a [[Republican]], he holds some [[liberal]] views. He is a supporter of [[gun control]] and [[environmentalism]].  He is a staunch supporter of a law that mandates the use of Californian taxpayer money to fund [[stem cell research]] - which is the cloning and killing of human embryos for experimentation; he is also [[pro-abortion]]. Arnold officially approved an [[assisted suicide]] measure allowing nurses to sedate, dehydrate and [[starve]] depressed or confused individuals they consider to be &amp;quot;[[terminally ill]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=76713 California approves nurse-assisted suicide] Worldnetdaily, October 02, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (Compare [[euthanasia]].) Governor Schwarzenegger also campaigned against the famous California [[Proposition 8]]. He married [[Maria Shriver]], a famous journalist who is a member of the historically liberal [[Kennedy Family]]. Because of these and other policies he is often referred to as a &amp;quot;[[RINO]],&amp;quot; a &amp;quot;Republican in Name Only&amp;quot; by many [[conservative]] [[Republicans]]. Other sources have labeled him a &amp;quot;California Republican,&amp;quot; meaning that his political policies are conservative but his views on civil liberties lean to the liberal side, reflecting the general attitude of most Californians. During his time as governor, the debt of California continued to balloon, forcing the state to pay IOU's for a period in 2009. Due to the budget crisis's under his tenure, Republicans lost the state to [[Jerry Brown]] in the 2010 Gubernatorial election. There is a belief based on these views that Schwarzenegger might be considered a borderline [[RINO]], however evidence has been lacking.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of Conservative or pro-Conservative Hollywood stars]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative media#Hollywood Conservatives|Hollywood conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:List of celebrities who support the Second Amendment]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of celebrities against Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://gov.ca.gov/ Governor of California Official Site]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=worldcat_org&amp;amp;q=Arnold+Schwarzenegger&amp;amp;submit=Search OCLC WorldCat keyword search for Arnold Schwarzenegger]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schwarzenegger, Arnold}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Actors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:California Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kennedy Family]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexual Agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RINOs]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Austrian People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:California]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Southern California]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sacramento]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People Associated with Firearms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DIANs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservatrump&amp;diff=1733517</id>
		<title>User talk:Conservatrump</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Conservatrump&amp;diff=1733517"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T22:42:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{welcome}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi guy! You need to cite your sources. Thanks! [[User:RobSmith|RobS]]&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;[[User talk:RobSmith|Free Kyle!]]&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; 17:28, 23 February 2021 (EST)&lt;br /&gt;
*: I think I have, thank you! [[User:Conservatrump|Conservatrump]] ([[User talk:Conservatrump|talk]]) 17:42, 23 February 2021 (EST)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Leftist&amp;diff=1733512</id>
		<title>Leftist</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Leftist&amp;diff=1733512"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T22:32:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Green New Deal Presser.jpg|right|275px|thumb|[[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]] is a [[Progressivism|progressive]] [[Democrat]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Leftist''' refers to someone on the Left side of the [[political spectrum]], such as a particularly [[liberal]] member of the [[American]] [[Democrat Party]], a member of the [[British]] [[Labour Party]], a [[progressive]], [[socialist]], [[Democratic Socialist]], or (to the far Left) a [[Communist]]. A Leftist supports collectivism, more government control of the economy, direct government control over social policy (although there were some leftists, such as [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], [[Michel Foucault]], and [[Noam Chomsky]] who adhered to a purely [[anarchism|anarchistic]] view of the world), including federal control over education at all levels, lower [[military]] spending, censorship of religion, a [[Living Constitution|living constitution]], [[Same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriages&amp;quot;]], a more unisex society, [[globalism]], [[transnationalism]], [[feminism]], the [[homosexual agenda]], [[anti-Semitism]], [[racism]], support for [[Islam]], taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], and sometimes even taxpayer-funded [[terrorism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/your-taxes-are-funding-terrorists-demand-that-this-stops&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[censorship]] of [[Christianity]] and [[social media]] in the public arena. Some leftists even want a totalitarian one-party world government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2017/02/28/geert-wilders-islam-not-religion-totalitarian-ideology/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/07/31/9-11-top-cop-bernie-kerik-ilhan-omar-is-a-terrorist-supporter-and-sympathizer/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Origins of leftist ideology ==&lt;br /&gt;
===French Revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Prise de la Bastille.jpg|thumb|200px|Capture of the [[Bastille Day|Bastille]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Secular left]] and [[History of Atheism|History of atheism]] and [[French Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the French [[Reign of Terror]] of the early [[Enlightenment]], the Left attempted a de-Christianization movement to replace the &amp;quot;reactionary&amp;quot; worship of God and replace it with the worship of national patriotism, or the ''Patrie''.  Many churches were closed and either converted into Temples of Reason,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Hall Stewart, ''A Documentary Survey of the French Revolution'' (Macmillan, New York, 1963).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or otherwise demolished outright under the order of Jacobin leader [[Maximilien de Robespierre]] under the pretense that their design was &amp;quot;undemocratic.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20050309031846/https://culturewars.com/CultureWars/Archives/Fidelity_archives/parricide.html Operation Parricide: Sade, Robespierre &amp;amp; the French Revolution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Left even formed a new calendar [[Liberal censorship|secularizing Christian holidays]]. This calendar was short-lived though and was never accepted in the rural, more religious parts of France. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term Left has its origins in 1790s, when in the French revolutionary parliament the representatives for the socialists sat to the presiding officer's left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.britannica.com/topic/left Left Ideology], Encyclopedia Britannica&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, it was also stated that the left-wing had some origins in the [[Book of Revelation]] when [[Jesus Christ]] transfigured people on his right and left as sheep and goats, respectively.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theculturewatch.com/the-french-revolution&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James Billington, Fire in the Minds of Men: Origin of the Revolutionary Faith.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==19th century European leftists ==&lt;br /&gt;
===Marx===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:KarlMarx.jpg|left|thumb|[[Karl Marx]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Karl Marx]] (May 5, 1818&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/letters/misc/1818-bc.htm Birth Certificate of Karl Marx], Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, ''Collected Works'', Vol. 1 (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1975), p. 635&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; – March 14, 1883) was a [[bourgeois]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Francis Wheen, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=3KOyuSakn80C Karl Marx: A Life]'' (W.W. Norton &amp;amp; Company, 2001) ISBN 0393321576, pp. 8, 278&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; political pamphleteer,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Bernard Shaw, “Trotsky, Prince of Pamphleteers,” ''The Nation'' (ISSN 0027-8378) Vol. 1922 No. 30 (June 7, 1922), pp. 560-561, reprinted in Brian Tyson, ed., ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ui6sNgX5vfQC Bernard Shaw's Book Reviews: Volume Two,1884-1950]'' (University Park, PA.: Penn State Press, 1996) ISBN 0271015489, pp. 440-450. Cf. Terrell Carver, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=HgbPEM0A4ksC The Postmodern Marx]'' (University Park, PA.: Penn State Press, 1998), p. 160&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; polemicist&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chris Matthew Sciaberra, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=D7z2ACODvLkC Marx, Hayek and Utopia]'' (SUNY Press, 1995) ISBN 0791426165, p.6. Cf. Michael Grenfell and Cheryl Hardy, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=ao6emzDlvIAC Art Rules: Pierre Bourdieu and the Visual Arts]'' (Berg Publishers, 2007) ISBN 1845202341, p.17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[propagandist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baron John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=ItJmAAAAMAAJ The Cambridge Modern History]'' (New York: The MacMillan Company, 1910), p. 758. Cf. Milorad M. Drachkovitch and Sidney Hook, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=MJkLqIlu-q4C Marxist Ideology in the Contemporary World: Its Appeals and Paradoxes]'' (Ayer Publishing, 1973) ISBN 0836981545, p. 113&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; credited as co-founder (with [[Friedrich Engels]]) of communism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=am7G9xBmlXAC The Communist Manifesto and Other Writings]'' (Barnes &amp;amp; Noble, 2005) ISBN 1593081006, p. vi&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and specifically of Marxism. Although Marx always considered himself an economist,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles H. Powers, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=cw8nRx08ix0C Making Sense of Social Theory: A Practical Introduction]'' (Rowman &amp;amp; Littlefield, 2010) ISBN 1442201193, p. 115&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;the Marxist system as a whole is not regarded as economics by the mainstream,&amp;quot; according to Don Ross, co-editor of ''[http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/oso/public/content/oho_philosophy/9780195189254/toc.html The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics]''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Don Ross, &amp;quot;[http://uct.academia.edu/documents/0095/6341/Economics__anti-economics_and_ideology.pdf Economic theory, anti-economics, and political ideology],&amp;quot; p. 10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ex-Marxist&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;'I was a Marxist when I went to the University of Chicago, and I was still a Marxist after I took [[Milton Friedman]]’s course. ... But just one summer as an economics intern in Washington got rid of all of that.' Sowell worked in the Labor Department, in the Wage and Hour Division. He was interested in whether minimum wages helped the poor by raising their pay or hurt them by denying them jobs. He found that the personnel around him were interested in other things: namely, the preservation of their own jobs, and the perpetuation of government programs.&amp;quot; Jay Nordlinger, &amp;quot;[https://www.nationalreview.com/nrd/article/?q=NTQ5ZjNhNzE5MjhmOGY5MjYwNGFjNmEwYWNmZjNmNTk= A Lion in High Summer],&amp;quot; ''National Review'', Vol. LXIII, No. 3 (February 21, 2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; economist [[Thomas Sowell]] agrees:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[T]he Marxian contribution to [[economics]] can be readily summarized as virtually zero. Professional economics as it exists today reflects no indication that Karl Marx ever existed... [T]he development of modern economics has simply ignored Marx. Even economists who are Marxists typically utilize a set of analytical tools to which Marx contributed nothing... In professional economics, ''Das Capital'' was a detour into a blind alley...&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thomas Sowell, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=TVkVAAAAIAAJ Marxism: Philosophy and Economics]'' (Taylor &amp;amp; Francis, 1985) ISBN 0043201717, p. 217.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
William Coleman of the Australian National University actually goes so far as to identify Marx as an &amp;quot;anti-economist.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William Coleman, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=jMipPwAACAAJ Economics and its Enemies: Two Centuries of Anti-Economics]'' (London: Palgrave as Macmillan, 2002) ISBN 1403941483, p. 234. As economics concerns human prosperity and thriving, &amp;quot;anti-economics&amp;quot; may be understood as an anti-human project of death and destruction.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ross concurs, labeling Marx &amp;quot;the most influential anti-economist of all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Don Ross, &amp;quot;[http://uct.academia.edu/documents/0095/6341/Economics__anti-economics_and_ideology.pdf Economic theory, anti-economics, and political ideology],&amp;quot; p. 10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even Michael Harrington, a well-known Marxist,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wayne Price, &amp;quot;[http://www.utopianmag.com/files/in/1000000043/wayne_utopia.pdf Anarchism: Utopian or Scientific?]&amp;quot; ''The Utopian'' Vol. 5, p. 62&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in his book, ''The Twilight of [[Capitalism]]'', devoted an entire chapter to Marx &amp;quot;The anti-economist.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Harrington, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=__ROAAAAMAAJ The Twilight of Capitalism]'' (Simon and Schuster, 1976) ISBN 0671227599, chapter 5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Nevertheless, men and women of zeal, often well-meaning but without understanding&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.&amp;quot; [http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0277_0438_ZD.html Brandeis, J., Dissenting], ''Olmstead v. United States'' 277 US 438 (1928)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of economics, ravaged the 20th century reifying Marx's anti-economics&amp;amp;mdash;in the process killing more people than all the century's wars combined.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R.J. Rummel, [http://democraticpeace.wordpress.com/2008/11/30/what-only-35000000-killed-in-20th-century-war/ What? Only 35,000,000 Killed in 20th Century War?], Democratic Peace Blog, November 30, 2008. In 1918, [[Grigory Zinoviev]], first head of the [[Comintern]], announced: &amp;quot;To overcome our enemies we must have our own socialist militarism. We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of [[Soviet Russia]]'s population. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated.&amp;quot; (George Leggett, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=NRUFAQAAIAAJ The Cheka: Lenin's Political Police]'' [Oxford University Press, 1986] ISBN 0-19-822862-7, p. 114) Zinoviev's estimate that the Soviets would murder 10 million people was far too low: Mid-range academic estimates of the number of civilians murdered by Marxists range from 94 million (Stéphane Courtois, ed. ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=H1jsgYCoRioC The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression]'' [Harvard University Press, 1999] ISBN 0-674-07608-7, p. 4) to 148 million. Margaret Cox, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=xMvOoPN58CoC The Scientific Investigation of Mass Graves: Towards Protocols and Standard Operating Procedures]'' [Cambridge University Press, 2008] ISBN 0521865875, p. 8; Cf. Rudy Rummel, [http://h-net.msu.edu/cgi-bin/logbrowse.pl?trx=vx&amp;amp;list=H-Genocide&amp;amp;month=0511&amp;amp;week=d&amp;amp;msg=kbHvcYM/g2BcFyVBXdoRew&amp;amp;user=&amp;amp;pw= Reevaluated democide totals for 20thC. and China], H-Genocide Discussion Logs, H-Net (Humanities and Social Sciences Online), Center for Humane Arts, Letters, and Social Sciences Online (Michigan State University), November 28, 2005; T. Matthew Ciolek, [http://www.ciolek.com/SPEC/rummel-on-democide-2005.html R.J. Rummel: Reevaluated democide totals for 20th C. and China], Asia Pacific Research Online, Internet Publications Bureau, Research School of Asian and Pacific Studies, National Institute for Asia and the Pacific (Australian National University), November 29, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bakunin===&lt;br /&gt;
Anarchist thinker Mikhail Bakunin critiqued prominent leftist theoritician [[Karl Marx]] in 1873 with these words,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;..if the [[proletariat]] is to be the ruling class, over whom is it to rule? ...the peasant &amp;quot;rabble&amp;quot; who, as it is known, does not enjoy the sympathy of the Marxists who consider it to represent a [[Racism|lower level of culture]], will probably be ruled by the factory proletariat of the cities. Or, if this problem is to be approached [[Nationalism|nationalist]]ically, the [[Slavs]] will be placed in the same subordinate relationship to the victorious German proletariat in which the latter now stands to the German bourgeoisie.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Bakunin, ''Statism and Anarchy'', (1873), in Sam Dolgoff, ''Bakunin'' On Anarchy, (Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1972), p. 330.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that Bakunin was also a leftist, and in fact, the only difference he had from Marx was the exact extent that they should get rid of government. In addition, he also declared regarding anarchism: &amp;quot;Let us put our trust in the eternal spirit which destroys and annihilates only because it is the unsearchable and eternally creative source of all life--the passion for destruction is also a creative passion!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Reaction in Germany'', 1842&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Richard Wagner also noted of Bakunin that “The annihilation of all civilization was the objective on which he had set his heart…. It was necessary, he said, to picture the whole European world - transformed into a pile of rubble.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/understanding-tyranny-and-terror-the-french-revolution-modern-islamism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard Wagner, quoted in Bryan Magee, The Tristan Chord: Wagner and Philosophy (New York: Henry Holt, 2000), p. 39.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States leftists ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article: [[American liberalism]]''&lt;br /&gt;
===State planning===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1904SO.JPG|thumb|200px|[[Eugene Debs|Debs]] for President poster, 1904]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States men such as [[Eugene Debs]], Maurice Hilquit and [[Norman Thomas]] believed they could, by a gradual series of alterations in the structure of society, create a truly democratic world in which all people would enjoy not merely freedom, but prosperity. They believed this could not be achieved under the system of [[private property]] and [[profit]]. They advocated a gradual acquisition by the State of all the great utilities, transportation, communication, and basic industries such as coal, oil, and steel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dream of a cooperative commonwealth in which all would share equally in the prosperity created by an economic system owned by the people was the vision of [[Socialist]]s.  This in theory would end [[poverty]], [[ignorance]] and [[crises]].  The idea was to [[Nationalization|nationalize]] banks, railroads, all means of transport, mines, and a few basic industries, but leave some factories, stores, farms, entertainment industries, etc., in the hands of private owners. The government would assume responsibility for making the economy work, for the well-being of all the citizens, their protection from the hazards of life, poverty, sickness, and old age. To make the whole economy work continuously without occasional [[Great Depression#Boom or Bust Cycles|boom-bust]] cycles, the government would create [[economic planning]] boards staffed by a bureaucratic class which would continuously study and observe the functioning of the economic system and make plans covering production, prices, distribution, financing, profits, [[wages]], hours, etc. Thus there would be Planned Capitalism, with the State responsible for the planning and for ensuring the carrying out of its plans through great government bureaus armed with the necessary powers to enforce compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Borrowing from fascism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Benito Mussolini Roman Salute.jpg|left|thumb|200px|[[Benito Mussolini]] after gaining power]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1920s [[Benito Mussolini]] had adopted the Planned Capitalist State and gave it the name &amp;quot;[[fascism]]&amp;quot;. [[Adolf Hitler]] adopted the same idea and called it [[National Socialism]]. Mussolini and Hitler both realized that a system which imposes a vast complex of decrees upon a people while subjecting them to confiscatory [[tax]]es to support the immense activities of the government cannot be operated except by an [[Absolutism|absolute]] government that has the power to enforce compliance. Prior to [[World War II]], this type of system had spread all over Europe. For nearly 70 years all the countries in Europe, with Germany in the lead, had been experimenting with the idea of the [[welfare state]], the State which attempts to provide its people with jobs and protection from all the hazards of life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This system is the direct opposite of [[classical liberalism]]. It is the negation of the classical liberal philosophy which for decades has been fighting to [[Emancipation|emancipate]] the people from the [[tyranny]] of the all-powerful State. During the [[New Deal]] this doctrine became known in America as &amp;quot;liberalism&amp;quot;. Liberals did not admit that it implied the restoration to the State those very powers which had been stripped from the State as the means of giving people [[freedom]]. They called it the [[planned economy]]. But it was and is fascism by whatever name it is known. Incrementally the government must be made stronger, and the rights of the citizens reduced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Modern leftists==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Cultural Marxism|Long march through the institutions}}&lt;br /&gt;
Modern leftists in the United States have come under increasing criticism as advocates of thought control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.humanevents.com//article.php?id=20562 Leftist Thought Control], David Limbaugh, ''Human Events'', 05/04/2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author David Limbaugh cites, &amp;quot;Consider the subjects of [[evolution]], [[global warming]], [[homosexual agenda|special rights for homosexuals]] and [[abstinence]] education. Consider efforts of the Left to [[Fairness Doctrine|silence conservative talk radio]]. Consider the mainstream media's arrogant denial of its transparent [[liberal bias]], pronouncing itself to be above politics and inherently objective and its critics somehow skewed....Consider the leftist refrain that [[red state]] conservatives do not merely possess a different world view, but are not part of the 'reality-based community.'&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gramsci===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gramsci.png|thumb|150px|right|[[Antonio Gramsci]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Antonio Gramsci]] was a lieutenant of [[Joseph Stalin]] who headed the [[Italian]] branch of the International Communist movement ([[Comintern]]). After several failed assassination attempts on Mussolini, Gramsci was imprisoned in 1926 until his death in 1937. While in prison Gramsci wrote his ''Prison Notebooks'', speculating on the failure of [[violent]] [[revolution]] to materialize in [[Western Europe]] as [[Karl Marx]] had predicted. Gramsci's works are considered by [[Socialists]] to be foundational to modern [[public education]] and [[Cultural Marxism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jstor.org/stable/23768314?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.marxists.org/archive/gramsci/prison_notebooks/problems/education.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdTTr4iYT0M&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gramsci's theory of &amp;quot;cultural hegemony&amp;quot; states that the ruling capitalist &amp;quot;oppressor&amp;quot; class uses cultural institutions, such as &amp;quot;traditional marriage,&amp;quot; to maintain power. The &amp;quot;oppressors&amp;quot; develop a &amp;quot;hegemonic culture&amp;quot; using [[ideology]] unlike Socialists who use [[violence]], economic force, and coercion. &amp;quot;Hegemonic culture&amp;quot; propagates its own values and norms so that they become &amp;quot;[[common sense]]&amp;quot; values and thus maintain the [[status quo]]. According to [[Wikipedia]], this &amp;quot;Hegemonic power is therefore used to maintain consent to the capitalist order, rather than coercive power using force&amp;quot; as Marxism does &amp;quot;to maintain order. This cultural hegemony is produced and reproduced&amp;quot; by the dominant Christian oppressor class &amp;quot;through the institutions that form the superstructure.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joseph A. Buttigieg, [[Pete Buttigieg]]'s father, was a founding member of the International Gramsci Society and served as the executive secretary.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20100616163619/http://english.nd.edu/faculty/profiles/joseph-a-buttigieg/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leftism: Use of condemnation/mockery rather than reasonable argumentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and mockery]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a ''BloombergView'' article, Stephen L. Carter wrote about the Left:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But the left has work to do, not only on policy and organization but also on attitude. Too many of my [[progressivism|progressive]] friends seem to have forgotten how to make actual arguments, and have become expert instead at condemnation, derision and mockery. On issue after issue, they’re very good at explaining why no one could oppose their policy positions except for the basest of motives. As to those positions themselves, they are too often announced with a zealous solemnity suggesting that their views are Holy Writ -- and those who disagree are cast into the outer political darkness. In short, the left has lately been dripping with hubris, which in classic literature always portends a fall.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-11-11/trump-and-the-fall-of-liberalism Trump and the Fall of Liberalism] by Stephen L. Carter, BloombergView&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, [[Atheism|atheists]] have skewed towards the [[Leftism|left]] side of the political aisle (see: [[Atheism and politics]] and [[Secular left]] and [[Atheism and communism]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://atheism.about.com/od/Atheist-Agnostic-Belief-Survey/a/Atheists-Agnostics-America-Politically-Liberal.htm Atheists &amp;amp; Agnostics in America Tend to be Politically Liberal]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Marxism-Leninsim&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url = http://www.investigatingatheism.info/marxism.html|title =Marxism|publisher = [[University of Cambridge]]|quote=The most notable spread of atheism was achieved through the success of the 1917 [[Russian Revolution]], which brought the Marxist-Leninists to power. For the first time in history, atheism thus became the official ideology of a state.|year=2008|accessdate = 2011–03–15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Guillotine&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=bf3m7IVAa9gC&amp;amp;pg=PA461&amp;amp;dq=France+atheism+guillotine++Christians+executed&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=l4lUUaTRBufG0QGe0IHACA&amp;amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=France%20atheism%20guillotine%20%20Christians%20executed&amp;amp;f=false|title =Christianity|author=James Adair|publisher = JBE Online Books|year=2007|quote=Although the Civil Constitution called for religious liberty, which was extended to Jews as well as Christians, many revolutionaries pushed for the establishment of a new state religion, either the Cult of Reason (atheists) or the Cult of the Supreme Being (Deists). Although the Civil Constitution called for religious liberty, which was extended to Jews as well as Christians, many revolutionaries pushed for the establishment of a new state religion, either the Cult of Reason (atheists) or the Cult of the Supreme Being (Deists). Changes to the calendar eliminated references to Christian holidays, and even the ancient seven-day week, and a list of officially recognized saints included such famous thinkers such as Socrates, Jesus, Marcus Aurelius, and Jean-Jacques Rosseau. A period of political persecution, often with religious overtones, broke out, known as the Reign of Terror. Thousands of people were executed by the guillotine, including many of the original leaders of the French Revolution.|page=461|accessdate = 2011–03–15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;France&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=9WkBAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA105&amp;amp;dq=Reign+of+Terror+atheism&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=HoRUUcD0NeXX0gGNo4HIDQ&amp;amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=Reign%20of%20Terror%20atheism&amp;amp;f=false|title =Memoirs of the reign of George III. to the session of parliament ending A.D. 1793, Volume 5|page=105|author=William Belsham|publisher = G.G. &amp;amp; J. Robinson|year=1801|quote=Reign of this portentous period, it has been eloquently tenor, and energetically observed, &amp;quot;that the reign of atheism in France was avowed the reign of terror. In the full madness of their career, in the highest climax of their horrors, they shut up the temples of God, abolished His worship, and proclaimed death to be an eternal sleep:-in the very centre of Christendom, Revelation underwent a total eclipse, while atheism, performing on a darkened theatre its strange and fearful tragedy, confounded the first elements of society, blended every age, rank, and sex ,indiscriminate proscription and massacre, and convulsed all Europe to its centre, that the imperishable memorial of these events might teach the last generations of mankind to consider religion as the pillar of society, the parent of social order, and the safe-guard of nations.&amp;quot; It is wonderful that, amid the horrors of this dismal period, while &amp;quot;the death dance of democratic revolution&amp;quot; was still in rapid movement, among the tears of affliction, and the cries of despair, &amp;quot;the masque, the song, the theatric scene, the buffoon laughter, went on as regularly as in the gay hour of festive peace.&amp;quot;|accessdate = 2011–03–15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Reign of Terror&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Tt5rqiCP1p8C&amp;amp;pg=PA57&amp;amp;dq=Reign+of+Terror+atheism&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=HoRUUcD0NeXX0gGNo4HIDQ&amp;amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=Reign%20of%20Terror%20atheism&amp;amp;f=false|title =Christianity, Islam, and Atheism: The Struggle for the Soul of the West|author=William Kilpatrick|publisher = [[Ignatius Press]]|year=2012|quote=Actually, it's helpful to think in terms of two Enlightenments: the Enlightenment that cut itself off from God. The former led to the American Revolution, the Declaration of Independence, the abolition of slavery, and the civil rights movement. The latter led to the French Revolution, the Reign of Terror, the suppression of church by state, and the godless philosophies of Marx and Nietzsche and their offspring-National Socialism and Communism. More recently the abandonment of God has led to the regime of cultural relativism that regards rights as arbitrary constructions. It's this second Enlightenment tradition that Cardinal Ratzinger referred to when he wrote, &amp;quot;The radical detachment of the Enlightenment philosophy from its roots ultimately leads it to dispense with man.&amp;quot; Actually this transition happened no &amp;quot;ultimately&amp;quot; but almost immediately. The first instance occurred when Enlightenment worship of abstract &amp;quot;reason&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;liberty&amp;quot; degenerated quickly into the mass murders committed during the anti-religious Reign of Terror in France. &amp;quot;Liberty, what crimes are committed in your name&amp;quot;, said Madam Rolande as she faced the statue of Liberty in the Place de la Revolution movements before her death at the guillotine. She was one of the early victims of a succession of secular systems based on rootless notions of &amp;quot;liberty&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;equality&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;reason&amp;quot;. As many historians have pointed out, the atheist regimes of modern times are guilty of far more crimes than any committed in the name of religion. Communist governments alone were guilty of more than one hundred million murders, most of them committed against their own people.|accessdate = 2011–03–15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the [[secular left]] is known for ridiculing [[religion]] since at least the time of [[French Revolution]] (see: [[Atheism and mockery]]), the secular Left is known for its humorlessness when it comes to others mocking of its ideology (See also: [[Atheism and humor]] and [[Atheism and intolerance]] and [[Atheist hypocrisy]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leftism and violence==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Leftist insurrection|Leftwing violence in the Trump era}}&lt;br /&gt;
Leftist ideology is known for its propensity to induce and inspire some of the most heinous and mindless acts of senseless violence and [[murder]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A Leftist deliberately swerved his pick-up truck to kill a [[Harley-Davidson]] motorcycle rider.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wbay.com/2020/07/09/fdl-sheriff-man-to-make-initial-court-appearance-following-fatal-crash-on-winnebago-drive/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftists defaced the [[Lincoln Memorial]] in [[Washington, D.C.]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2020/06/11/social-justice-warriors-deface-statues-of-actual-social-justice-warriors/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftists tore down a statue to [[Frederick Douglass]], a runaway slave.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nationalfile.com/black-lives-matter-rioters-topple-statue-of-black-abolitionist-legend-frederick-douglass/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftists vandalized statues of [[Mahatma Gandhi]] in Washington and [[London]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftists defaced the statue of [[Winston Churchill]] in London who defeated [[Adolf Hitler]] and the [[Third Reich]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In keeping with [[San Francisco values]], leftists tore down the statue of [[Ulysses S. Grant]] who accepted the surrender of [[Confederate]] General [[Robert E. Lee]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Madison, Wisconsin]], leftists tore down the statue of Col. Christian Heg, an [[abolitionist]] who gave his life free [[Black]]s.  The same leftist [[homophobe]]s nearly beat to death a [[gay]] [[Democrat]] state senator who witnessed the violence.&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Boston]], [[Massachusetts]], leftists defaced the 54th Regiment Memorial to Black soldiers in the [[Civil War]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.westernjournal.com/rioters-deface-monument-black-civil-war-veterans-served-union/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Seattle]]'s [[CHOP]] zone, leftists shot three Blacks, killing two, one of the child. The third survivor was also a child.&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Atlanta]], [[Georgia]], leftists murdered an 8 year old Black girl and a Black male adult as part of the [[Black Lives Matter]] protests.&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[St. Louis]], [[Missouri]], leftist murdered a 77 year old retired Black police captain in retaliation for the murder of [[George Floyd]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Oakland, California]], leftists murdered a Black federal security policeman to protest police brutality against Blacks.&lt;br /&gt;
*In Washington, D.C., leftists defaced to [[World War II]] memorial to commemorate the soldiers who defeated [[fascism]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftists are church burners.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2020/06/01/breaking-rioters-burn-historic-st-johns-church-in-d-c-deface-monuments-across-the-city-n474820&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2020/05/21/mississippi-church-that-refused-to-closed-burned-down-by-arsonist-who-leaves-message/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The future of Leftism ==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Decline of leftism| Decline of the secular left}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Leftism and humor]]lessness&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War on Freedom]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peoples Temple Agricultural Collective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Leftist chants]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alliance for Global Justice]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/09/the_imploding_leftist_establishment.html The Imploding Leftist Establishment], ''American Thinker''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marx2mao.com/Lenin/LWC20.html V. I. Lenin, ''&amp;quot;Left-Wing&amp;quot; Communism, An Infantile Disorder''] (1920) V. I. Lenin, Selected Works, English edition, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1952, Vol. II, Part 2.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://jonjayray.tripod.com/leftism2.html John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.), ''THE MOTIVATIONS OF POLITICAL LEFTISTS'']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Democrat establishment}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Leftism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Arnold_Schwarzenegger&amp;diff=1733509</id>
		<title>Arnold Schwarzenegger</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Arnold_Schwarzenegger&amp;diff=1733509"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T22:26:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Arnold Schwarzenegger&lt;br /&gt;
|image=About arnold img-2.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Republican]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Maria Shriver]] (separated)&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=[[Roman Catholic]]&lt;br /&gt;
|offices=&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/governor&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=California&lt;br /&gt;
        |number=38th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=November 17, 2003 - January 3, 2011&lt;br /&gt;
        |preceded=[[Gray Davis]]&lt;br /&gt;
        |succeeded=[[Jerry Brown]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Arnold Alois Schwarzenegger''' (b. [[Graz]], [[Austria]] 1947) is an [[Austria]]n-[[United States of America|American]] actor, politician, [[steroid]]-enhanced [[bodybuilding|bodybuilder]], and businessman, who served as the 38th [[Governor]] of [[California]] from 2003 to 2011.  [[Anti-Trump]], Schwarzenegger unsuccessfully replaced [[Donald Trump]] on ''The Apprentice'', resulting in a ratings collapse of that show.  More recently Schwarzenegger has devoted himself to nonpartisan [[redistricting]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/bill-whalen/article138898898.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Acting career==&lt;br /&gt;
Schwarzenegger rose to fame with action movies including Commando, Conan the Barbarian and the Terminator franchise. His on-screen presence was characterized by his large stature, as well as his thick Austrian accent. Once one of the highest paid actors in [[Hollywood]], Schwarzenegger has recently returned to acting, following the end of his term as Governor.&lt;br /&gt;
==Recall Election==&lt;br /&gt;
After sitting Governor [[Gray Davis]] mismanaged electric power deregulation and instituted a new registration tax by [[executive order]], infuriated citizens initiated a petition to place a measure on the ballot to remove him from office. Despite [[Democratic]] predictions that the petition would fail, it was delivered to then Secretary of State Kevin Shelley with more than the required number of signatures. In accordance with the law, Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante became Acting Governor and called a special election for October 7, 2003. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The election was only the second of its kind in United States history. Approximately 180 citizens, from all walks of life, declared candidacy. Schwarzenegger was rumored to be considering a run for office, which was confirmed on an appearance on the NBC TV [[Tonight Show]]. Schwarzenegger easily defeated Cruz Bustamante in the election.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the election was over, Schwarzenegger was sworn in on November 17, 2003, to serve the remainder of Davis' term. Despite a period of sagging poll numbers, Schwarzenegger was reelected by a landslide on November 7, 2006. He defeated Democrat Phil Angelides, the then-State Treasurer of California.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political views==&lt;br /&gt;
Despite being a [[Republican]], he holds some [[liberal]] views. He is a supporter of [[gun control]] and [[environmentalism]].  He is a staunch supporter of a law that mandates the use of Californian taxpayer money to fund [[stem cell research]] - which is the cloning and killing of human embryos for experimentation; he is also [[pro-abortion]]. Arnold officially approved an [[assisted suicide]] measure allowing nurses to sedate, dehydrate and [[starve]] depressed or confused individuals they consider to be &amp;quot;[[terminally ill]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=76713 California approves nurse-assisted suicide] Worldnetdaily, October 02, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (Compare [[euthanasia]].) Governor Schwarzenegger also campaigned against the famous California [[Proposition 8]]. He married [[Maria Shriver]], a famous journalist who is a member of the historically liberal [[Kennedy Family]]. Because of these and other policies he is often referred to as a &amp;quot;[[RINO]],&amp;quot; a &amp;quot;Republican in Name Only&amp;quot; by many [[conservative]] [[Republicans]]. Other sources have labeled him a &amp;quot;California Republican,&amp;quot; meaning that his political policies are conservative but his views on civil liberties lean to the liberal side, reflecting the general attitude of most Californians. During his time as governor, the debt of California continued to balloon, forcing the state to pay IOU's for a period in 2009. Due to the budget crisis's under his tenure, Republicans lost the state to [[Jerry Brown]] in the 2010 Gubernatorial election. It seems that, overall, Schwarzenegger might be considered a borderline [[RINO]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of Conservative or pro-Conservative Hollywood stars]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Conservative media#Hollywood Conservatives|Hollywood conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Essay:List of celebrities who support the Second Amendment]] &lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of celebrities against Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://gov.ca.gov/ Governor of California Official Site]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.worldcat.org/search?qt=worldcat_org&amp;amp;q=Arnold+Schwarzenegger&amp;amp;submit=Search OCLC WorldCat keyword search for Arnold Schwarzenegger]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Schwarzenegger, Arnold}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Actors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republican Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:California Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Kennedy Family]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Former Governors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexual Agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:RINOs]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Austrian People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:California]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Southern California]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Sacramento]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People Associated with Firearms]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hollywood Conservatives]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:DIANs]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Leftist&amp;diff=1733498</id>
		<title>Leftist</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Leftist&amp;diff=1733498"/>
		<updated>2021-02-23T22:04:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Conservatrump: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Green New Deal Presser.jpg|right|275px|thumb|[[Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez]] is a [[Progressivism|progressive]] [[Democrat]].]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Leftist''' refers to someone on the Left side of the [[political spectrum]], such as a particularly [[liberal]] member of the [[American]] [[Democrat Party]], a member of the [[British]] [[Labour Party]], a [[progressive]], [[socialist]], [[Democratic Socialist]], or (to the far Left) a [[Communist]]. A Leftist supports collectivism, more government control of the economy, direct government control over social policy (although there were some leftists, such as [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], [[Michel Foucault]], and [[Noam Chomsky]] who adhered to a purely [[anarchism|anarchistic]] view of the world), including federal control over education at all levels, lower [[military]] spending, censorship of religion, a [[Living Constitution|living constitution]], [[Same-sex marriage|same-sex &amp;quot;marriages&amp;quot;]], a more unisex society, [[globalism]], [[transnationalism]], [[feminism]], the [[homosexual agenda]], [[anti-Semitism]], [[racism]], support for [[Islam]], taxpayer-funded [[abortion]], and sometimes even taxpayer-funded [[terrorism]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/your-taxes-are-funding-terrorists-demand-that-this-stops&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[censorship]] of [[Christianity]] and [[social media]] in the public arena. Some leftists even want a totalitarian one-party world government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Origins of leftist ideology ==&lt;br /&gt;
===French Revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Prise de la Bastille.jpg|thumb|200px|Capture of the [[Bastille Day|Bastille]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Secular left]] and [[History of Atheism|History of atheism]] and [[French Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the French [[Reign of Terror]] of the early [[Enlightenment]], the Left attempted a de-Christianization movement to replace the &amp;quot;reactionary&amp;quot; worship of God and replace it with the worship of national patriotism, or the ''Patrie''.  Many churches were closed and either converted into Temples of Reason,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John Hall Stewart, ''A Documentary Survey of the French Revolution'' (Macmillan, New York, 1963).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; or otherwise demolished outright under the order of Jacobin leader [[Maximilien de Robespierre]] under the pretense that their design was &amp;quot;undemocratic.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20050309031846/https://culturewars.com/CultureWars/Archives/Fidelity_archives/parricide.html Operation Parricide: Sade, Robespierre &amp;amp; the French Revolution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Left even formed a new calendar [[Liberal censorship|secularizing Christian holidays]]. This calendar was short-lived though and was never accepted in the rural, more religious parts of France. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term Left has its origins in 1790s, when in the French revolutionary parliament the representatives for the socialists sat to the presiding officer's left.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.britannica.com/topic/left Left Ideology], Encyclopedia Britannica&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, it was also stated that the left-wing had some origins in the [[Book of Revelation]] when [[Jesus Christ]] transfigured people on his right and left as sheep and goats, respectively.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theculturewatch.com/the-french-revolution&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James Billington, Fire in the Minds of Men: Origin of the Revolutionary Faith.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==19th century European leftists ==&lt;br /&gt;
===Marx===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:KarlMarx.jpg|left|thumb|[[Karl Marx]]]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Karl Marx]] (May 5, 1818&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/letters/misc/1818-bc.htm Birth Certificate of Karl Marx], Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, ''Collected Works'', Vol. 1 (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1975), p. 635&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; – March 14, 1883) was a [[bourgeois]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Francis Wheen, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=3KOyuSakn80C Karl Marx: A Life]'' (W.W. Norton &amp;amp; Company, 2001) ISBN 0393321576, pp. 8, 278&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; political pamphleteer,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Bernard Shaw, “Trotsky, Prince of Pamphleteers,” ''The Nation'' (ISSN 0027-8378) Vol. 1922 No. 30 (June 7, 1922), pp. 560-561, reprinted in Brian Tyson, ed., ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=Ui6sNgX5vfQC Bernard Shaw's Book Reviews: Volume Two,1884-1950]'' (University Park, PA.: Penn State Press, 1996) ISBN 0271015489, pp. 440-450. Cf. Terrell Carver, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=HgbPEM0A4ksC The Postmodern Marx]'' (University Park, PA.: Penn State Press, 1998), p. 160&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; polemicist&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chris Matthew Sciaberra, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=D7z2ACODvLkC Marx, Hayek and Utopia]'' (SUNY Press, 1995) ISBN 0791426165, p.6. Cf. Michael Grenfell and Cheryl Hardy, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=ao6emzDlvIAC Art Rules: Pierre Bourdieu and the Visual Arts]'' (Berg Publishers, 2007) ISBN 1845202341, p.17&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[propagandist]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baron John Emerich Edward Dalberg Acton, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=ItJmAAAAMAAJ The Cambridge Modern History]'' (New York: The MacMillan Company, 1910), p. 758. Cf. Milorad M. Drachkovitch and Sidney Hook, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=MJkLqIlu-q4C Marxist Ideology in the Contemporary World: Its Appeals and Paradoxes]'' (Ayer Publishing, 1973) ISBN 0836981545, p. 113&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; credited as co-founder (with [[Friedrich Engels]]) of communism&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=am7G9xBmlXAC The Communist Manifesto and Other Writings]'' (Barnes &amp;amp; Noble, 2005) ISBN 1593081006, p. vi&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and specifically of Marxism. Although Marx always considered himself an economist,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Charles H. Powers, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=cw8nRx08ix0C Making Sense of Social Theory: A Practical Introduction]'' (Rowman &amp;amp; Littlefield, 2010) ISBN 1442201193, p. 115&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;quot;the Marxist system as a whole is not regarded as economics by the mainstream,&amp;quot; according to Don Ross, co-editor of ''[http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/oso/public/content/oho_philosophy/9780195189254/toc.html The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics]''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Don Ross, &amp;quot;[http://uct.academia.edu/documents/0095/6341/Economics__anti-economics_and_ideology.pdf Economic theory, anti-economics, and political ideology],&amp;quot; p. 10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ex-Marxist&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;'I was a Marxist when I went to the University of Chicago, and I was still a Marxist after I took [[Milton Friedman]]’s course. ... But just one summer as an economics intern in Washington got rid of all of that.' Sowell worked in the Labor Department, in the Wage and Hour Division. He was interested in whether minimum wages helped the poor by raising their pay or hurt them by denying them jobs. He found that the personnel around him were interested in other things: namely, the preservation of their own jobs, and the perpetuation of government programs.&amp;quot; Jay Nordlinger, &amp;quot;[https://www.nationalreview.com/nrd/article/?q=NTQ5ZjNhNzE5MjhmOGY5MjYwNGFjNmEwYWNmZjNmNTk= A Lion in High Summer],&amp;quot; ''National Review'', Vol. LXIII, No. 3 (February 21, 2011)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; economist [[Thomas Sowell]] agrees:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|[T]he Marxian contribution to [[economics]] can be readily summarized as virtually zero. Professional economics as it exists today reflects no indication that Karl Marx ever existed... [T]he development of modern economics has simply ignored Marx. Even economists who are Marxists typically utilize a set of analytical tools to which Marx contributed nothing... In professional economics, ''Das Capital'' was a detour into a blind alley...&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Thomas Sowell, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=TVkVAAAAIAAJ Marxism: Philosophy and Economics]'' (Taylor &amp;amp; Francis, 1985) ISBN 0043201717, p. 217.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
William Coleman of the Australian National University actually goes so far as to identify Marx as an &amp;quot;anti-economist.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;William Coleman, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=jMipPwAACAAJ Economics and its Enemies: Two Centuries of Anti-Economics]'' (London: Palgrave as Macmillan, 2002) ISBN 1403941483, p. 234. As economics concerns human prosperity and thriving, &amp;quot;anti-economics&amp;quot; may be understood as an anti-human project of death and destruction.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ross concurs, labeling Marx &amp;quot;the most influential anti-economist of all.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Don Ross, &amp;quot;[http://uct.academia.edu/documents/0095/6341/Economics__anti-economics_and_ideology.pdf Economic theory, anti-economics, and political ideology],&amp;quot; p. 10&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Even Michael Harrington, a well-known Marxist,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wayne Price, &amp;quot;[http://www.utopianmag.com/files/in/1000000043/wayne_utopia.pdf Anarchism: Utopian or Scientific?]&amp;quot; ''The Utopian'' Vol. 5, p. 62&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in his book, ''The Twilight of [[Capitalism]]'', devoted an entire chapter to Marx &amp;quot;The anti-economist.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Harrington, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=__ROAAAAMAAJ The Twilight of Capitalism]'' (Simon and Schuster, 1976) ISBN 0671227599, chapter 5&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Nevertheless, men and women of zeal, often well-meaning but without understanding&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.&amp;quot; [http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0277_0438_ZD.html Brandeis, J., Dissenting], ''Olmstead v. United States'' 277 US 438 (1928)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; of economics, ravaged the 20th century reifying Marx's anti-economics&amp;amp;mdash;in the process killing more people than all the century's wars combined.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;R.J. Rummel, [http://democraticpeace.wordpress.com/2008/11/30/what-only-35000000-killed-in-20th-century-war/ What? Only 35,000,000 Killed in 20th Century War?], Democratic Peace Blog, November 30, 2008. In 1918, [[Grigory Zinoviev]], first head of the [[Comintern]], announced: &amp;quot;To overcome our enemies we must have our own socialist militarism. We must carry along with us 90 million out of the 100 million of [[Soviet Russia]]'s population. As for the rest, we have nothing to say to them. They must be annihilated.&amp;quot; (George Leggett, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=NRUFAQAAIAAJ The Cheka: Lenin's Political Police]'' [Oxford University Press, 1986] ISBN 0-19-822862-7, p. 114) Zinoviev's estimate that the Soviets would murder 10 million people was far too low: Mid-range academic estimates of the number of civilians murdered by Marxists range from 94 million (Stéphane Courtois, ed. ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=H1jsgYCoRioC The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression]'' [Harvard University Press, 1999] ISBN 0-674-07608-7, p. 4) to 148 million. Margaret Cox, ''[https://books.google.com/books?id=xMvOoPN58CoC The Scientific Investigation of Mass Graves: Towards Protocols and Standard Operating Procedures]'' [Cambridge University Press, 2008] ISBN 0521865875, p. 8; Cf. Rudy Rummel, [http://h-net.msu.edu/cgi-bin/logbrowse.pl?trx=vx&amp;amp;list=H-Genocide&amp;amp;month=0511&amp;amp;week=d&amp;amp;msg=kbHvcYM/g2BcFyVBXdoRew&amp;amp;user=&amp;amp;pw= Reevaluated democide totals for 20thC. and China], H-Genocide Discussion Logs, H-Net (Humanities and Social Sciences Online), Center for Humane Arts, Letters, and Social Sciences Online (Michigan State University), November 28, 2005; T. Matthew Ciolek, [http://www.ciolek.com/SPEC/rummel-on-democide-2005.html R.J. Rummel: Reevaluated democide totals for 20th C. and China], Asia Pacific Research Online, Internet Publications Bureau, Research School of Asian and Pacific Studies, National Institute for Asia and the Pacific (Australian National University), November 29, 2005&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Bakunin===&lt;br /&gt;
Anarchist thinker Mikhail Bakunin critiqued prominent leftist theoritician [[Karl Marx]] in 1873 with these words,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;..if the [[proletariat]] is to be the ruling class, over whom is it to rule? ...the peasant &amp;quot;rabble&amp;quot; who, as it is known, does not enjoy the sympathy of the Marxists who consider it to represent a [[Racism|lower level of culture]], will probably be ruled by the factory proletariat of the cities. Or, if this problem is to be approached [[Nationalism|nationalist]]ically, the [[Slavs]] will be placed in the same subordinate relationship to the victorious German proletariat in which the latter now stands to the German bourgeoisie.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Michael Bakunin, ''Statism and Anarchy'', (1873), in Sam Dolgoff, ''Bakunin'' On Anarchy, (Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1972), p. 330.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It should be noted that Bakunin was also a leftist, and in fact, the only difference he had from Marx was the exact extent that they should get rid of government. In addition, he also declared regarding anarchism: &amp;quot;Let us put our trust in the eternal spirit which destroys and annihilates only because it is the unsearchable and eternally creative source of all life--the passion for destruction is also a creative passion!&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Reaction in Germany'', 1842&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Richard Wagner also noted of Bakunin that “The annihilation of all civilization was the objective on which he had set his heart…. It was necessary, he said, to picture the whole European world - transformed into a pile of rubble.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.heritage.org/political-process/report/understanding-tyranny-and-terror-the-french-revolution-modern-islamism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard Wagner, quoted in Bryan Magee, The Tristan Chord: Wagner and Philosophy (New York: Henry Holt, 2000), p. 39.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==United States leftists ==&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article: [[American liberalism]]''&lt;br /&gt;
===State planning===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:1904SO.JPG|thumb|200px|[[Eugene Debs|Debs]] for President poster, 1904]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States men such as [[Eugene Debs]], Maurice Hilquit and [[Norman Thomas]] believed they could, by a gradual series of alterations in the structure of society, create a truly democratic world in which all people would enjoy not merely freedom, but prosperity. They believed this could not be achieved under the system of [[private property]] and [[profit]]. They advocated a gradual acquisition by the State of all the great utilities, transportation, communication, and basic industries such as coal, oil, and steel. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dream of a cooperative commonwealth in which all would share equally in the prosperity created by an economic system owned by the people was the vision of [[Socialist]]s.  This in theory would end [[poverty]], [[ignorance]] and [[crises]].  The idea was to [[Nationalization|nationalize]] banks, railroads, all means of transport, mines, and a few basic industries, but leave some factories, stores, farms, entertainment industries, etc., in the hands of private owners. The government would assume responsibility for making the economy work, for the well-being of all the citizens, their protection from the hazards of life, poverty, sickness, and old age. To make the whole economy work continuously without occasional [[Great Depression#Boom or Bust Cycles|boom-bust]] cycles, the government would create [[economic planning]] boards staffed by a bureaucratic class which would continuously study and observe the functioning of the economic system and make plans covering production, prices, distribution, financing, profits, [[wages]], hours, etc. Thus there would be Planned Capitalism, with the State responsible for the planning and for ensuring the carrying out of its plans through great government bureaus armed with the necessary powers to enforce compliance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Borrowing from fascism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Benito Mussolini Roman Salute.jpg|left|thumb|200px|[[Benito Mussolini]] after gaining power]]&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1920s [[Benito Mussolini]] had adopted the Planned Capitalist State and gave it the name &amp;quot;[[fascism]]&amp;quot;. [[Adolf Hitler]] adopted the same idea and called it [[National Socialism]]. Mussolini and Hitler both realized that a system which imposes a vast complex of decrees upon a people while subjecting them to confiscatory [[tax]]es to support the immense activities of the government cannot be operated except by an [[Absolutism|absolute]] government that has the power to enforce compliance. Prior to [[World War II]], this type of system had spread all over Europe. For nearly 70 years all the countries in Europe, with Germany in the lead, had been experimenting with the idea of the [[welfare state]], the State which attempts to provide its people with jobs and protection from all the hazards of life. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This system is the direct opposite of [[classical liberalism]]. It is the negation of the classical liberal philosophy which for decades has been fighting to [[Emancipation|emancipate]] the people from the [[tyranny]] of the all-powerful State. During the [[New Deal]] this doctrine became known in America as &amp;quot;liberalism&amp;quot;. Liberals did not admit that it implied the restoration to the State those very powers which had been stripped from the State as the means of giving people [[freedom]]. They called it the [[planned economy]]. But it was and is fascism by whatever name it is known. Incrementally the government must be made stronger, and the rights of the citizens reduced.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Modern leftists==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Cultural Marxism|Long march through the institutions}}&lt;br /&gt;
Modern leftists in the United States have come under increasing criticism as advocates of thought control.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.humanevents.com//article.php?id=20562 Leftist Thought Control], David Limbaugh, ''Human Events'', 05/04/2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Author David Limbaugh cites, &amp;quot;Consider the subjects of [[evolution]], [[global warming]], [[homosexual agenda|special rights for homosexuals]] and [[abstinence]] education. Consider efforts of the Left to [[Fairness Doctrine|silence conservative talk radio]]. Consider the mainstream media's arrogant denial of its transparent [[liberal bias]], pronouncing itself to be above politics and inherently objective and its critics somehow skewed....Consider the leftist refrain that [[red state]] conservatives do not merely possess a different world view, but are not part of the 'reality-based community.'&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gramsci===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Gramsci.png|thumb|150px|right|[[Antonio Gramsci]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Antonio Gramsci]] was a lieutenant of [[Joseph Stalin]] who headed the [[Italian]] branch of the International Communist movement ([[Comintern]]). After several failed assassination attempts on Mussolini, Gramsci was imprisoned in 1926 until his death in 1937. While in prison Gramsci wrote his ''Prison Notebooks'', speculating on the failure of [[violent]] [[revolution]] to materialize in [[Western Europe]] as [[Karl Marx]] had predicted. Gramsci's works are considered by [[Socialists]] to be foundational to modern [[public education]] and [[Cultural Marxism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.jstor.org/stable/23768314?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.marxists.org/archive/gramsci/prison_notebooks/problems/education.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fdTTr4iYT0M&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gramsci's theory of &amp;quot;cultural hegemony&amp;quot; states that the ruling capitalist &amp;quot;oppressor&amp;quot; class uses cultural institutions, such as &amp;quot;traditional marriage,&amp;quot; to maintain power. The &amp;quot;oppressors&amp;quot; develop a &amp;quot;hegemonic culture&amp;quot; using [[ideology]] unlike Socialists who use [[violence]], economic force, and coercion. &amp;quot;Hegemonic culture&amp;quot; propagates its own values and norms so that they become &amp;quot;[[common sense]]&amp;quot; values and thus maintain the [[status quo]]. According to [[Wikipedia]], this &amp;quot;Hegemonic power is therefore used to maintain consent to the capitalist order, rather than coercive power using force&amp;quot; as Marxism does &amp;quot;to maintain order. This cultural hegemony is produced and reproduced&amp;quot; by the dominant Christian oppressor class &amp;quot;through the institutions that form the superstructure.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joseph A. Buttigieg, [[Pete Buttigieg]]'s father, was a founding member of the International Gramsci Society and served as the executive secretary.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20100616163619/http://english.nd.edu/faculty/profiles/joseph-a-buttigieg/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Leftism: Use of condemnation/mockery rather than reasonable argumentation ==&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and mockery]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a ''BloombergView'' article, Stephen L. Carter wrote about the Left:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|But the left has work to do, not only on policy and organization but also on attitude. Too many of my [[progressivism|progressive]] friends seem to have forgotten how to make actual arguments, and have become expert instead at condemnation, derision and mockery. On issue after issue, they’re very good at explaining why no one could oppose their policy positions except for the basest of motives. As to those positions themselves, they are too often announced with a zealous solemnity suggesting that their views are Holy Writ -- and those who disagree are cast into the outer political darkness. In short, the left has lately been dripping with hubris, which in classic literature always portends a fall.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-11-11/trump-and-the-fall-of-liberalism Trump and the Fall of Liberalism] by Stephen L. Carter, BloombergView&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, [[Atheism|atheists]] have skewed towards the [[Leftism|left]] side of the political aisle (see: [[Atheism and politics]] and [[Secular left]] and [[Atheism and communism]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://atheism.about.com/od/Atheist-Agnostic-Belief-Survey/a/Atheists-Agnostics-America-Politically-Liberal.htm Atheists &amp;amp; Agnostics in America Tend to be Politically Liberal]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Marxism-Leninsim&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url = http://www.investigatingatheism.info/marxism.html|title =Marxism|publisher = [[University of Cambridge]]|quote=The most notable spread of atheism was achieved through the success of the 1917 [[Russian Revolution]], which brought the Marxist-Leninists to power. For the first time in history, atheism thus became the official ideology of a state.|year=2008|accessdate = 2011–03–15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Guillotine&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=bf3m7IVAa9gC&amp;amp;pg=PA461&amp;amp;dq=France+atheism+guillotine++Christians+executed&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=l4lUUaTRBufG0QGe0IHACA&amp;amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=France%20atheism%20guillotine%20%20Christians%20executed&amp;amp;f=false|title =Christianity|author=James Adair|publisher = JBE Online Books|year=2007|quote=Although the Civil Constitution called for religious liberty, which was extended to Jews as well as Christians, many revolutionaries pushed for the establishment of a new state religion, either the Cult of Reason (atheists) or the Cult of the Supreme Being (Deists). Although the Civil Constitution called for religious liberty, which was extended to Jews as well as Christians, many revolutionaries pushed for the establishment of a new state religion, either the Cult of Reason (atheists) or the Cult of the Supreme Being (Deists). Changes to the calendar eliminated references to Christian holidays, and even the ancient seven-day week, and a list of officially recognized saints included such famous thinkers such as Socrates, Jesus, Marcus Aurelius, and Jean-Jacques Rosseau. A period of political persecution, often with religious overtones, broke out, known as the Reign of Terror. Thousands of people were executed by the guillotine, including many of the original leaders of the French Revolution.|page=461|accessdate = 2011–03–15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;France&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=9WkBAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA105&amp;amp;dq=Reign+of+Terror+atheism&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=HoRUUcD0NeXX0gGNo4HIDQ&amp;amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=Reign%20of%20Terror%20atheism&amp;amp;f=false|title =Memoirs of the reign of George III. to the session of parliament ending A.D. 1793, Volume 5|page=105|author=William Belsham|publisher = G.G. &amp;amp; J. Robinson|year=1801|quote=Reign of this portentous period, it has been eloquently tenor, and energetically observed, &amp;quot;that the reign of atheism in France was avowed the reign of terror. In the full madness of their career, in the highest climax of their horrors, they shut up the temples of God, abolished His worship, and proclaimed death to be an eternal sleep:-in the very centre of Christendom, Revelation underwent a total eclipse, while atheism, performing on a darkened theatre its strange and fearful tragedy, confounded the first elements of society, blended every age, rank, and sex ,indiscriminate proscription and massacre, and convulsed all Europe to its centre, that the imperishable memorial of these events might teach the last generations of mankind to consider religion as the pillar of society, the parent of social order, and the safe-guard of nations.&amp;quot; It is wonderful that, amid the horrors of this dismal period, while &amp;quot;the death dance of democratic revolution&amp;quot; was still in rapid movement, among the tears of affliction, and the cries of despair, &amp;quot;the masque, the song, the theatric scene, the buffoon laughter, went on as regularly as in the gay hour of festive peace.&amp;quot;|accessdate = 2011–03–15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Reign of Terror&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Tt5rqiCP1p8C&amp;amp;pg=PA57&amp;amp;dq=Reign+of+Terror+atheism&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=HoRUUcD0NeXX0gGNo4HIDQ&amp;amp;redir_esc=y#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=Reign%20of%20Terror%20atheism&amp;amp;f=false|title =Christianity, Islam, and Atheism: The Struggle for the Soul of the West|author=William Kilpatrick|publisher = [[Ignatius Press]]|year=2012|quote=Actually, it's helpful to think in terms of two Enlightenments: the Enlightenment that cut itself off from God. The former led to the American Revolution, the Declaration of Independence, the abolition of slavery, and the civil rights movement. The latter led to the French Revolution, the Reign of Terror, the suppression of church by state, and the godless philosophies of Marx and Nietzsche and their offspring-National Socialism and Communism. More recently the abandonment of God has led to the regime of cultural relativism that regards rights as arbitrary constructions. It's this second Enlightenment tradition that Cardinal Ratzinger referred to when he wrote, &amp;quot;The radical detachment of the Enlightenment philosophy from its roots ultimately leads it to dispense with man.&amp;quot; Actually this transition happened no &amp;quot;ultimately&amp;quot; but almost immediately. The first instance occurred when Enlightenment worship of abstract &amp;quot;reason&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;liberty&amp;quot; degenerated quickly into the mass murders committed during the anti-religious Reign of Terror in France. &amp;quot;Liberty, what crimes are committed in your name&amp;quot;, said Madam Rolande as she faced the statue of Liberty in the Place de la Revolution movements before her death at the guillotine. She was one of the early victims of a succession of secular systems based on rootless notions of &amp;quot;liberty&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;equality&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;reason&amp;quot;. As many historians have pointed out, the atheist regimes of modern times are guilty of far more crimes than any committed in the name of religion. Communist governments alone were guilty of more than one hundred million murders, most of them committed against their own people.|accessdate = 2011–03–15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the [[secular left]] is known for ridiculing [[religion]] since at least the time of [[French Revolution]] (see: [[Atheism and mockery]]), the secular Left is known for its humorlessness when it comes to others mocking of its ideology (See also: [[Atheism and humor]] and [[Atheism and intolerance]] and [[Atheist hypocrisy]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Leftism and violence==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Leftist insurrection|Leftwing violence in the Trump era}}&lt;br /&gt;
Leftist ideology is known for its propensity to induce and inspire some of the most heinous and mindless acts of senseless violence and [[murder]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*A Leftist deliberately swerved his pick-up truck to kill a [[Harley-Davidson]] motorcycle rider.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.wbay.com/2020/07/09/fdl-sheriff-man-to-make-initial-court-appearance-following-fatal-crash-on-winnebago-drive/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftists defaced the [[Lincoln Memorial]] in [[Washington, D.C.]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2020/06/11/social-justice-warriors-deface-statues-of-actual-social-justice-warriors/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftists tore down a statue to [[Frederick Douglass]], a runaway slave.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nationalfile.com/black-lives-matter-rioters-topple-statue-of-black-abolitionist-legend-frederick-douglass/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftists vandalized statues of [[Mahatma Gandhi]] in Washington and [[London]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftists defaced the statue of [[Winston Churchill]] in London who defeated [[Adolf Hitler]] and the [[Third Reich]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In keeping with [[San Francisco values]], leftists tore down the statue of [[Ulysses S. Grant]] who accepted the surrender of [[Confederate]] General [[Robert E. Lee]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Madison, Wisconsin]], leftists tore down the statue of Col. Christian Heg, an [[abolitionist]] who gave his life free [[Black]]s.  The same leftist [[homophobe]]s nearly beat to death a [[gay]] [[Democrat]] state senator who witnessed the violence.&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Boston]], [[Massachusetts]], leftists defaced the 54th Regiment Memorial to Black soldiers in the [[Civil War]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.westernjournal.com/rioters-deface-monument-black-civil-war-veterans-served-union/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Seattle]]'s [[CHOP]] zone, leftists shot three Blacks, killing two, one of the child. The third survivor was also a child.&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Atlanta]], [[Georgia]], leftists murdered an 8 year old Black girl and a Black male adult as part of the [[Black Lives Matter]] protests.&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[St. Louis]], [[Missouri]], leftist murdered a 77 year old retired Black police captain in retaliation for the murder of [[George Floyd]].&lt;br /&gt;
*In [[Oakland, California]], leftists murdered a Black federal security policeman to protest police brutality against Blacks.&lt;br /&gt;
*In Washington, D.C., leftists defaced to [[World War II]] memorial to commemorate the soldiers who defeated [[fascism]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Leftists are church burners.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2020/06/01/breaking-rioters-burn-historic-st-johns-church-in-d-c-deface-monuments-across-the-city-n474820&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2020/05/21/mississippi-church-that-refused-to-closed-burned-down-by-arsonist-who-leaves-message/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The future of Leftism ==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Decline of leftism| Decline of the secular left}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Leftism and humor]]lessness&lt;br /&gt;
*[[War on Freedom]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Peoples Temple Agricultural Collective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Leftist chants]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Alliance for Global Justice]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/09/the_imploding_leftist_establishment.html The Imploding Leftist Establishment], ''American Thinker''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.marx2mao.com/Lenin/LWC20.html V. I. Lenin, ''&amp;quot;Left-Wing&amp;quot; Communism, An Infantile Disorder''] (1920) V. I. Lenin, Selected Works, English edition, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1952, Vol. II, Part 2.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://jonjayray.tripod.com/leftism2.html John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.), ''THE MOTIVATIONS OF POLITICAL LEFTISTS'']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Democrat establishment}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Leftism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberalism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Conservatrump</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>