<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=ChuckKobasew</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=ChuckKobasew"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/ChuckKobasew"/>
	<updated>2026-11-12T12:00:00Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lemon_test&amp;diff=340422</id>
		<title>Lemon test</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Lemon_test&amp;diff=340422"/>
		<updated>2007-11-21T03:31:36Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;ChuckKobasew: adding a more concrete reference&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''Lemon test''' was set forth in 1971 by the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] to enable suppression of nearly all public recognition of religion with an enormously expanded interpretation of the [[Establishment Clause]] of the [[First Amendment]].  ''[[Lemon v. Kurtzman]]'', 403 U.S. 602 (1971).  The test requires that all federal and state laws (1) have a [[secular]] purpose, (2) a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits [[religion]], and (3) no excessive [[government]] entanglement with religion.  If any law violates any part of this three-pronged test, then it will be stricken by the courts and declared unconstitutional.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief Justice [[Warren Burger]] wrote the ''Lemon'' decision for the Court, but admitted privately that he never intended for it to be applied in the broad manner that it was.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinner conversation between the late Chief Justice [[Warren Burger]] and [[Andrew Schlafly]] in late 1991.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Others have contested this claim as inherently flawed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Online discussion between [[Chuck Kobasew]] and [[Phil Kessel]] in 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:United States law]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ChuckKobasew</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>