<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Charlieneal</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Charlieneal"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Charlieneal"/>
	<updated>2026-10-08T17:32:56Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Benjamin_Franklin&amp;diff=1025169</id>
		<title>Benjamin Franklin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Benjamin_Franklin&amp;diff=1025169"/>
		<updated>2012-12-26T23:24:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Charlieneal: /* Philadelphia Printer */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Founding Fathers&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Benjamin.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|State:=Pennsylvania							&lt;br /&gt;
|Religion:=Christian- Episcopalian (Deist) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Founding Documents:=[[Declaration of Independence]], &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[United States Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Benjamin Franklin''' (January 17, 1706, [[Boston]] - April 17, 1790 [[Philadelphia]]), was an American [[polymath]], printer, inventor, statesman, and one of the most prominent scientists in the world of the [[Enlightenment]], famed for his discoveries in electricity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was known as &amp;quot;the First American&amp;quot; because his efforts were critical to the formation of a new nation, the success of the [[American Revolution]] and the unification of the 13 colonies into the United States of America. Serving as the American minister to France, he secured decisive military and financial support for the Revolution, while asserting the values of democracy and [[republicanism]]. He assisted [[Thomas Jefferson]] in writing the [[Declaration of Independence]] in 1776 and helped legitimize the [[U.S. Constitution]] in 1787.  His effective diplomacy, creative nationalism, promotion of civic virtue and devotion to [[republicanism]] earned him the top tier as a [[Founding Father]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Life==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was born on January 17, 1706 in [[Boston]], [[Massachusetts]] into a Puritan family.  His father was Josiah Franklin, a soap and candle maker, who was married twice and had 17 children.  Benjamin briefly attended the very good South Grammar School (affiliated with the Boston Latin School), then at age 10 was pulled out by his father. He was apprenticed at age 12 to his brother James Franklin  (1697-1735), one of the first American printers.  James published ''[[New England Courant]]'' and it became Ben's first public forum for his essays, written under the pseudonym &amp;quot;Silence Dogood.&amp;quot;  Ben, pretending to be a widow, wrote 14 essays in 1722.  The essays drew the anger of the local authorities, who prohibited James from publishing it, citing that it mocked religion.  Ben, now aged 17, was under legal obligation to his brother but broke with him, and ran away to Philadelphia on his own.  Franklin visited his many relatives in Boston in 1733  and reconciled with his brother, and when James died at the age of 38, Ben helped his widow and took charge of James' oldest son.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philadelphia Printer ==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin found work as a printer in Philadelphia. Pennsylvania governor William Keith was one of his patrons, and he persuaded Franklin  to go into business for himself and offered him letters of credit in London to purchase equipment.  When he arrived in London in December 1724, he learned that Keith's letters of credit were useless.  Franklin stayed in London, working in the local print shops.  In 1726, he returned to Philadelphia and again worked in print shops. In 1728, Franklin partnered with Hugh Meredith to opened their own print shop.  Franklin soon bought out Meredith and in 1730 began publishing ''The Pennsylvania Gazette'' newspaper, which he bought from his former employer, Samuel Keimer.  Besides the newspaper and almanac, he was a job printer and churned out pamphlets, religious tracts, playbills, tickets, advertisements, legal forms, soap wrappers, election notices, currency, carrier addresses, government documents, book labels, and other ephemeral items.  In his leisure moments he taught himself to read French, Spanish, Italian, and Latin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Almanack===&lt;br /&gt;
In late 1732, he began writing and publishing ''Poor Richard's Almanack'', under the guise of &amp;quot;Poor Richard Saunders&amp;quot; and his wife, Bridget, both fictional characters.  The almanack provided useful information on the seasons while enlightening the reader with witty short sayings. Franklin had a knack for rewording and improving old proverbs in a wittier manner. The almanac appeared annually from 1732 to 1758, selling over 250,000 copies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Poor Richard's Almanack'' shaped provincial society by trumpeting the virtuous common man and by pushing such men into active roles in the public sphere. ''Poor Richard'' outsold competing almanacs published by Atkins, Leeds, Taylor, Jerman, Birkett, and Godfrey by appealing to and providing information for the masses. In the process, Franklin spread the Whig ideology that became American [[republicanism]] to his readers. He praised them for having a better intuitive political knowledge and devotion to republican virtue than those in higher social positions. While trying to open the public sphere to men of ability (like himself), Franklin closed it to women, the poor, and non-English nationalities and races. By discussing Pennsylvania politics and other issues, ''Poor Richard's Almanack'' sought to transform its readers into diligent citizens who would help develop a politically active private sphere within colonial America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; William Pencak, &amp;quot;Politics and Ideololgy in Poor Richard's Almanack&amp;quot;. ''Pennsylvania Magazine Ideologyof History and Biography'' 1992 116(2): 183-211&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==National communications network==&lt;br /&gt;
One long-term project was creating a network of printers, especially using his own apprentices who would move to other cities to establish themselves. The network of allied printer-publishers extended from New England to the West Indies and lasted from 1729 to the 1790s. It composed his relatives and business associates. It financed printers, played a vital role in developing American journalism, and influenced American morals and ethics by widely disseminating Franklin's ideology of virtue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon finding apprentices whose diligence, skill, and character impressed him, Franklin would make them partners, often setting them up in printing businesses of their own. Subsequently, he would use them to expand his business associations, and as deputy postmaster-general for North America he would set up his associates as postmasters in their local areas. Postmasters were the first to receive news and could communicate it quickly to Franklin through their free use of the postal system. By building and using his communications network Franklin was able to both keep abreast of important developments in the colonies and build a network of supporters and admirers who influenced public opinion in their own cities.  As the revolutionary era began, Franklin opposed colonial independence from Britain. Network infighting ensued, pitting Loyalist printers Thomas Wharton and Joseph Galloway against pro-independence publisher William Goddard, who created a private system to deliver his papers that became a model for the US Postal Service. The Continental Congress later appointed Franklin postmaster general, and he, not Goddard, received credit for America's postal system. In 1768, reacting to the Stamp and Townshend acts, Franklin became an activist in the Patriot cause. Many network printers, such as David Hall and James Holt, followed suit, as the colonists polarized between Patriots and Loyalists. As revolt approached, network newspapers became influential foes of Britain. War, turmoil, and Franklin's diplomatic absence while in France caused the network eventually to dissolve, and be replaced by networks of party newspapers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ralph Frasca,  &amp;quot;'The Glorious Publick Virtue so Predominant in Our Rising Country': Benjamin Franklin's Printing Network During the Revolutionary Era.&amp;quot; ''American Journalism'' 1996 13(1): 21-37. 0882-1127; Frasca, ''Benjamin Franklin's Printing Network: Disseminating Virtue in Early America'' (2006) [http://www.questia.com/read/111742668?title=Benjamin%20Franklin's%20Printing%20Network%3a%20Disseminating%20Virtue%20in%20Early%20America online edition]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Marriage==&lt;br /&gt;
In September 1730, Franklin entered a common law marriage with Deborah Read. No legal ceremony was possible because Deborah was still legally married; her husband had deserted to avoid paying a debt. Around this time, Franklin fathered an illegitimate son by an unknown woman; [[William Franklin]] was raised in his new household.  In 1732, his first son with Deborah, Francis died of smallpox at the age of 4, leading Franklin to become an advocate of vaccinations.  Sarah Franklin, who went by Sally, was born 11 years later in 1743. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Civic leader==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin became Philadelphia's leading citizen, founding and leading many civic organizations.  He was the founder of the American tradition of boosterism, as well as a systematic thinker who analyzed urban problems in the context of rapid population growth.  Franklin's understanding of and solution for the urban problems of a growing Philadelphia shaped his later ideas about city-country relationships and his pessimism regarding the future of the United States. Beginning in the 1730s, Franklin actively and publicly addressed such issues as the link between the environment and disease, fire prevention, pollution from tanneries, and restoring the water system in the center of the city (called the Dock) through various engineering projects. Franklin helped improve fire safety and waste handling by mid-century, but manufacturing interests could not be controlled. Franklin believed America would eventually exhaust its vast supply of open, unpopulated land and become increasingly urbanized and demographically imbalanced, thereby making Philadelphia's problems the nation's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; A. Michal McMahon, &amp;quot;'Small Matters': Benjamin Franklin, Philadelphia, and the 'Progress of Cities.'&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography'' 1992 116(2): 157-182. 0031-4587 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After 1727 Franklin typically operated through &amp;quot;the Junto&amp;quot;, an informal club comprising friends, civil leaders and fellow tradesmen.  He established America's first subscription library, the Library Company of Philadelphia, in 1731.  In 1736, he organized the first volunteer fire department, the Union Fire Company.  In 1743, he expanded the idea of the Junto to all of the colonies by organizing the [[American Philosophical Society]].  He helped fund the first hospital and planned a professional police force.&lt;br /&gt;
===Moral reform===&lt;br /&gt;
During the 1730s Franklin made a determined effort to use the emerging power of his press to clean up both private character and public space by writing against the excesses of drink, alehouses, fairs, gambling, and other idle pursuits. Franklin's focus on the body and its potential excess is reflective of a transformation in body image and self-image that was part of a broader range of religious, economic, and political transformations that emerged in the 18th century. All were part of a challenge to the traditional authority of church and state; the growth of commerce, the market, and the print public sphere; and the proliferation of a political ideology that presaged the Declaration of Independence. In his ''Autobiography'' (1771) Franklin utilized the body and its &amp;quot;inclinations&amp;quot; to drive his narrative. In contrast to [[Thomas Jefferson]], who appealed to abstract human rights, and [[John Adams]], who invoked historical precedent and English canon law, Franklin portrayed the Revolution as an ongoing struggle between inclination and reason.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Betsy Erkkila, &amp;quot;Franklin and the Revolutionary Body.&amp;quot; ''ELH'' (English Literary History) 2000 67(3): 717-741. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/30031934 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin did not derive his ideas on ethics and virtue from Puritan thought.  The orthodox Puritans stressed the concept of a &amp;quot;double calling,&amp;quot; one which distinguishes between an outward calling and an inward one. For the Puritan, the inward calling - through which man is justified by God's grace - took precedence over the outward calling - man's commitment to the world. [[Cotton Mather]]'s &amp;quot;Bonifacius,&amp;quot; which Franklin cites as an influence in the development of his own philosophy, maintains this distinction. Franklin's commitment is to the outward calling. He rejects the central doctrines of Puritanism: Providence, Election, and Original Sin. Franklin actually retained few Puritan ideals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Campbell Tatham, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin, Cotton Mather and the Outward State.&amp;quot; ''Early American Literature'' 1972 6(3): 223-233. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/25070534 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin's moral theories stemmed from a commonly held concept among 18th-century [[Enlightenment]] philosophers: that the development of habit can be used for achieving behavioral change. Franklin's approach to the gaining of moral progress was neopagan rather than Christian in its orientation. It stressed the gradual modification of the person's observable actions instead of an emphasis on internal spiritual change. In essence, Franklin's attitude toward habit and moral improvement was almost identical to that later espoused by [[John Stuart Mill]] and the utilitarian and associationist schools of philosophy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Norman S. Fiering, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and the Way to Virtue&amp;quot;. ''American Quarterly'' 1978 30(2): 199-223. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/2712323 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Library===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was the main organizer of the Library Company of Philadelphia, founded in 1731 by middle class &amp;quot;artificers,&amp;quot; (craftsmen, like printers, and owners of small businesses). They sought to improve their condition and status through self-education. The library reflected Franklin's belief that reading could change expectations and positions in society. The books at the library were extremely important in Franklin's intellectual development, and his experience there strengthened his beliefs about education. Through the library, members pursued many interests and became involved in natural science through Peter Collinson of London, who acted as its book agent. Nonmembers of both sexes also used the library.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Boudreau,  &amp;quot;'Highly Valuable And Extensively Useful': Community and Readership among the Eighteenth-Century Philadelphia Middling Sort.&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History'' 1996 63(3): 302-329.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin's 1749 &amp;quot;Proposals for the Education of Youth in Pensilvania,&amp;quot; in which he proposes the formation of an academy and discusses its basically secular curriculum. Religion is to be taught under the rubric of history:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;History ''will also afford frequent Opportunities of showing the Necessity of a ''Publick Religion,'' from its Usefulness to the Publick; the advantage of a Religious Character among private Persons; the Mischiefs of Superstition, &amp;amp;c. and the Excellency of the CHRISTIAN RELIGION above all others, ancient and modern.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not a college man, Franklin proposed educational changes that broke decisively with many traditional educational practices of his day. His proposals reflect his own view of the Enlightenment and its perception of the human mind. He helped establish of the &amp;quot;College of Philadelphia&amp;quot; (now the [[University of Pennsylvania. Unlike Harvard and Yale it was nonsectarian and did not primarily train clergy. Instead it educated students for careers in the professions and business and for public service. It established America's first modern liberal arts curriculum.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; George W. Boudreau, &amp;quot;'Done by a Tradesman': Franklin's Educational Proposals and the Culture Of Eighteenth-Century Pennsylvania.&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History'' 2002 69(4): 524-557. 0031-4528; see [http://www.upenn.edu/about/heritage.php online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
===Militia===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin helped create the Pennsylvania Militia, independent of the colonial government.  The repeated [[French and Indian Wars]] were a threat to the frontier, as the French based in Canada organized and armed Indians who raided the frontier settlements.  The government was controlled by the Penn family and the [[Quakers]], who refused to organize any military defense.  In November 1747, Franklin wrote ''Plain Truth'' advocating the creation of a defense force, since the government would not do so.  The pamphlet was enthusiastically received and Franklin organized the &amp;quot;Association&amp;quot; in 1747 to defend against attacks on settlements along the Delaware River. It was the first volunteer militia in Pennsylvania.  By the end of 1747 ten volunteer regiments, composed of 124 volunteer companies (designed to have 50-100 men each), had been raised. But the militia was organized only after long debate, much of which involved biblical comparisons and religious justifications from both supporters (including Franklin) and opponents of military preparedness. The debate foreshadowed the ultimate demise of Quaker rule in Pennsylvania, since the Quaker legislators realized their refusal to defend the colony meant they had to resign office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Barbara A. Gannon, &amp;quot;The Lord is a Man of War, The God of Love and Peace: The Association Debate, Philadelphia 1747-1748.&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History 1998'' 65(1): 46-61. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Opposes multiculturalism===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin had a vision of an ethnically homogeneous America, and so he had negative views on the large and expanding German community in Pennsylvania (usually called the &amp;quot;Pennsylvania Dutch.&amp;quot;)  Franklin's first contacts with the Pennsylvania Germans concerned business. In 1731 he printed two books in German for German Baptists; he also printed into pamphlet form a letter from Conrad Weiser, an Indian negotiator, to Christopher Sauer, a German-language publisher. However, in from the late 1740s into the 1750s, Franklin believed that the Germans could not be assimilated into Englishmen and thus would always be aliens. He disliked the failure of the Germans to assimilate--they had their own language, religion and customs, and showed no interest in becoming like Englishmen or in joining the militia.  In &amp;quot;Observations on the Increase of Mankind&amp;quot; (1751), Franklin expressed his opposition toward German immigrants, whom he ridiculed:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;why should the Palatine Boors be suffered to swarm into our Settlements and, by herding together, establish their Language and Manners, to the Exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Angli-fying them .. .?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite Franklin's fears, German settlers helped secure the colony's borders against France's Indian supporters during the French and Indian War. Franklin's 1751 remarks came back to haunt him during the 1764 election to determine whether Pennsylvania would remain a proprietary colony or become a royal one (as Franklin advocated) when Franklin's opponents used his comments about the German colonists to defeat his position. Franklin kept silent about the Germans. He was pleased that the Reformed and Lutheran Germans supported the French and Indian War (1757-63) and, even more important, the American Revolution (1775-1783), even as the numerous German pacifist sects like the Dunkers, Amish and Mennonites remained neutral. Franklin and the Germans finally were reconciled in 1787 when Franklin College (now Franklin and Marshall College), was established to promote an better knowledge of the German and English languages, and was named in his honor by the Germans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; John B. Frantz, &amp;quot;Franklin and the Pennsylvania Germans&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History'' 1998 65(1): 21-34. 0031-4528; Glenn Weaver, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and the Pennsylvania Germans,&amp;quot; ''William and Mary Quarterly'' Vol. 14, No. 4 (Oct., 1957), pp. 536-559 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1918520 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to British conquest of French-speaking Quebec in 1759, he wrote &amp;quot;The Canada Pamphlet.&amp;quot; It stands as one of the most complex and sophisticated pieces of pre-Revolutionary American thought. In it, Franklin entertained ideas of a homogeneous American population in manners, language, and religion as a reaction against ethnic and political warfare within Europe. Drawing on the ideas of [[Thomas Hobbes]], [[David Hume]], and [[Baruch Spinoza]], Franklin believed that political and ethnic relations were exclusively dominated by power, leaving no room for multiculturalism in America, preferring instead the implementation of the British Crown model to foster internal peace in the colonies.  Having a reputation as anti-German hurt Franklin politically, and he dropped the nativism after 1765.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Alberto Lena, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin's 'Canada Pamphlet' or 'The Ravings of a Mad Prophet': Nationalism, Ethnicity and Imperialism.&amp;quot; ''European Journal of American Culture'' 2001 20(1): 36-49. 1466-0407 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Demography===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1751 Franklin wrote &amp;quot;Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, Etc.&amp;quot; in which he both anticipated the [[Robert Malthus|Malthusian]] theory of population growth and quite accurately predicted the rate of American population increase for the following century and a half. He showed that the American population doubled every 25 years, while Europe and Asia were static or grew very slowly. England's population supposedly took 360 years to double.  There is a paradox in Franklin's treatment of population. He maintained that the tendency of populations to expand until checked by the lack of subsistence was a cause of European miseries, yet he advocated rapid population growth for the American colonies. When his population theory is highlighted, he appears as a Malthusian pessimist; when his population values are highlighted, he appears as an ardent pro-natalist. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dennis Hodgson, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin on Population: From Policy to Theory,&amp;quot; ''Population and Development Review,''  Vol. 17, No. 4 (Dec., 1991), pp. 639-661 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1973600 in JSTOR]; Alfred Owen Aldridge, &amp;quot;Franklin as Demographer,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic History,'' Vol. 9, No. 1 (May, 1949), pp. 25-44 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2113719 in JSTOR] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Science and invention ==&lt;br /&gt;
By age 42, Franklin was wealthy enough to retire from publishing and devote most of his time to his scientific pursuits, keeping in touch with the leading scientists in Britain and the Continent.  Franklin combined commonsense empiricism, always paying very close attention to details and carefully recording his measurements. At the same time he was insatiably speculative, theoretical, and conjectural. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin's numerous inventions include bifocal glasses&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see   [http://www.antiquespectacles.com/topics/franklin/franklin.htm illustration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the glass armonica, the flexible catheter, the odometer, and swimming fins. &lt;br /&gt;
===Stove===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1742 he invented a device inserted into a fireplace that gave more warmth at a lower fuel cost. His idea, worked out with his friend Robert Grace, consisted of a low stove, equipped with loosely fitting iron plates through which air circulated and was warmed before it entered the room. This &amp;quot;New Pennsylvania Fireplace&amp;quot; avoided drafts, gave more   even temperatures throughout the room, and checked loss of heat through the chimney.  It was an insert in an already existing hearth, and did not resemble what are now called &amp;quot;Franklin stoves&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Meteorology===&lt;br /&gt;
The first contributions to scientific meteorology in America were Franklin's famous experiments regarding lightning, atmospheric electricity, cyclone theory, and ocean circulation, during the years from 1748 to 1775. Franklin designed the experiment that proved that electric sparks created artificially in the laboratory  were similar to deadly and destructive lightning bolts, except in magnitude. He proved that there were electric charges in the atmosphere both in cloudy (or thunder) weather and in fine weather. Franklin showed that storms may move   progressively &amp;quot;into the wind,&amp;quot; by observing that a cyclonic storm with a northeast wind hit Philadelphia a day or so before it hit Boston, which lies to the northeast of Philadelphia. Finally, while crossing the Atlantic between 1746 and 1775, and after discussions with his cousin a ship captain, he reported there is a warm current off the New England coast setting to the northeast--the [[Gulf Stream]]--and was able to chart its boundaries fairly accurately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discovering electricity===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin's great scientific achievement came in his experiments and theories regarding [[electricity]].  He was first intrigued by the concept after meeting Archibald Spencer and witnessing his demonstrations on the creation of static electricity. In 1747, Spencer donated a glass tube and information on generating electricity to the Library Company.  Franklin had several of these glass devices made for his experiments.  He theorized that electricity was one &amp;quot;fluid.&amp;quot;  He discovered that when a &amp;quot;positive&amp;quot; charge is created that a &amp;quot;negative&amp;quot; charge is created as well, which became known as the [[conservation of charge]].  He also began using [[Leyden jar]]s, a glass jar with foil on the outside and a conductor such as water or metal on the inside that could be charged with a wire.  Franklin determined that the charge was not stored in the conductor, as was previously thought, and was held in the glass.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;We now know that the Leyden jar is an early form of the [[capacitor]], that the charge is contained in a layer of the conductor facing the glass and that the glass (the [[dielectricum]]) increases the [[capacitance]] of the jar (amount of charge that can be held).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Based on this knowledge, he invented the first electrical battery, which was a series of glass planks that were flanked by metal and wired together.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Franklin - kite.jpg|left|360px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin began noticing the similar properties of [[lightning]] and electrical sparks, which led to his most famous experiment.  In 1750, Franklin outlined his proposal in two letters to Peter Collinson, which were published and presented to the Royal Society in London. On May 10, 1752 French scientist [[Thomas-François D'Alibard]] successfully performed Franklin's experiment outside of Paris.  In June, before word of success had crossed the Atlantic, Franklin performed his kite and key experiment with his son, William, with similar success, which has become a popular part of American folklore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.mos.org/sln/toe/kite.html], [http://www.thebakken.org/electricity/franklin-kite.html]  and [http://www2.fi.edu/exhibits/permanent/electricity.php]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led to the invention of lightning rods [http://fi.edu/franklin/inventor/images/rod.jpg], which became widespread in the colonies, as well as Europe, bringing international fame to Franklin almost overnight.  In 1753, he received honorary degrees from both Harvard and Yale, and the Royal Society in London awarded him the prestigious [[Copley Medal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin is responsible for the nomenclature of &amp;quot;positive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;negative&amp;quot; charge. He believed he could tell the direction in which electricity traveled by observing sparks. He was wrong; the electrons, which are the particles carrying ordinary [[electricity]], move in the opposite of the direction he thought they did. As a result, when electrons were discovered, according to Franklin's designation they had to be considered as having a negative charge.&lt;br /&gt;
===Controversies===&lt;br /&gt;
There were many rivalries among scientists of the day and Franklin joined in energetically. At every point of Franklin's career, rival scientists disputed his claims to inventions and disagreed with his scientific results. Abbé Nollet, the leader of the French scientific community, reported on experiments which he believed illustrated the shortcomings of Franklin's research on electricity. Nollet maintained that Franklin's lightning rods might ignite fires by attracting electricity. Various European scientists claimed to have thought of Franklin's kite or lightning rod experiments before Franklin. Leading British experimenter William Watson claimed that most of Franklin's ideas had their origins in his own work. Political controversy swirled in England in 1772 when members of the Royal Society debated whether lightning rods should be &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;blunts.&amp;quot; George III entered the controversy by demanding that blunts should be placed on the royal palace after an official committee, of which Franklin was a member, recommended pointed rods to protect the government powder magazine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; I. Bernard Cohen, &amp;quot;Franklin's Scientist Enemies: Real or Imagined&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History'' 1998 65(1): 7-20. 0031-4528 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Albany Plan of Union 1754==&lt;br /&gt;
While Franklin thought of himself as a loyal subject, and was comfortable with monarchy and aritocracy, he did express an emerging sense of Americanism.  In 1753, London promoted Franklin to the position of Deputy Postmaster for the Colonies.  The industrious Franklin, who frequently took inspection tours throughout the colonies, revamped the postal system to be more efficient, speeding up delivery times and creating the home delivery system.  From visiting the colonies first hand, coupled with the increasing need for frontier defense, Franklin realized that some form of unification of the colonies was necessary.  In June 1754, a conference was called by the London Board of Trade to meet in Albany, New York to discuss a more unified defense.  He proposed the &amp;quot;Albany Plan of Union&amp;quot;, which would have united the colonies under a royal governor, and given the colonies the power to tax themselves. Delegates from several colonies had come together to discuss ways to restore harmonious relations with the Indians but soon found themselves debating Franklin's plan of union, which would have created a unified colonial entity. The Plan was approved by the conference but was unanimously rejected by the colonial assemblies and by London. It was twenty years too soon for the colonies to give up their smug complacency and dependence upon London, rather than each other.  In 1754 colonists assumed Britain was a benevolent empire run for the benefit of colonists, but within twenty years realized their error. The Albany plan formed much of the basis for the later American governments established by the [[Articles of Confederation]] and the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politician==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1751, after serving as a clerk 15 years, Franklin was elected to the Pennsylvania Assembly.  He used his new position to advance civic projects such as pushing legislation to maintain and light the streets.  One of the primary issues faced by the Assembly was keeping their frontier border safe from Indian attacks orchestrated by the French.  There was frequent conflict between the Assembly and the Proprietary leadership of the Penn family.  The Penns controlled a vast majority of the lands in Pennsylvania, however, forbid them to be taxed which hampered the Assembly's ability to build an adequate militia.  Penn repeatedly fought the Penn family and tried, without success, to have the King take direct control of Pennsylvania.&lt;br /&gt;
==Colonial agent in London==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1757 Franklin was sent to London as the paid representative or lobbyist of the Pennsylvania Assembly to present the colony's side of its controversy with the Penn family, which still owned the colony. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His attempts to persuade this to both Thomas Penn and Parliament failed.  Although his mission was over by 1758, Franklin lingered in London for another four years.  He enjoyed his time meeting with the local intellectuals and political radicals, and with a touch of regret returned to Philadelphia in 1762.  His return to Philadelphia was to be short-lived.  In the 1764 elections, Franklin failed to be reelected after a vicious pamphlet war labeled him as anti-German and Scottish, which made up a majority of Pennsylvania's frontier population.  He found this to be a blessing in disguise when the Assembly elected to send him back to London to serve as their agent once again.  He tried and failed to obtain a recall of the Penn charter. Franklin also became the paid agent in London for Georgia in 1768, for New Jersey in 1769, and for Massachusetts in 1770. These appointments, together with his wide reputation, made Franklin a sort of ambassador extraordinary from the American colonies to Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He remained abroad for eighteen years, not returning to American until 1775. He was invited to join the &amp;quot;Lunar Society&amp;quot; in [[Birmingham]], where he met many intellectuals and leaders of the emerging [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stamp Act===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Benjamin Franklin 1767.jpg|thumb|Benjamin Franklin, 1767.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1765, he blundered by assuring British politicians that Americans would accept the [[Stamp Act]].  He sent a letter to Philadelphia that was made public urging the colonies to simply make the best of it, leading to the misconception that Franklin had something to do with authoring the Stamp Act.  News of colonial protest caused him to reverse his position and he helped negotiated trepeal of the hated tax.  Afterwards, Franklin regularly opposed British attempts to tax the colonies, arguing that the colonists had the same rights as other British subjects, with the ability to govern and tax through an elected legislature.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1767, Parliament passed the [[Townshend Act]], another tax on colonial goods.  Franklin, still loyal to the crown, took a moderate approach - simultaneously criticizing the rash colonials and the rash government. Increasing the great divide was representation in parliament. Americans had none. &lt;br /&gt;
===Hutchinson letters===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1773, Franklin somehow obtained the originals of secret letters written written 1767-1769 by Thomas Hutchinson when he was Chief Justice of Massachusetts to a member of the British government soliciting troops and urging abridgment of American liberties. Franklin sent the letters to friends in the colony, who in turn published them.  His intent was to pin the blame on people like Hutchinson for encouraging the unpopular policies, which he hoped would promote a spirit of reconciliation with Britain.  He misjudged the situation, however, which led to the Massachusetts Assembly demanding that Parliament remove Hutchinson from his governorship. London by now had lost all patience with the American colonies and had embarked on a series of punishments designed to humiliate the Americans and make them stay in their inferior places. London sent more troops to Boston and brought Franklin before the Privy Council where he was viciously humiliated in public on January 29, 1775.  He was stripped of his position of postmaster. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin's political roles in London in 1757-62 and 1764-75 reshaped his political views. Although he loved the scientists and intellectuals, he hated the politicians. He came to see Britain as vain and corrupt, and he returned to his native America in 1775 with the hope that in a still-uncorrupted republic virtue might prevail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Esmond Wright, &amp;quot;'The Fine and Noble China Vase, The British  Empire': Benjamin Franklin's 'Love-Hate' View of  England&amp;quot;. ''Pennsylvania Magazine of History And Biography''  1987 111(4): 435-464.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Continental Congress===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin arrived back in Philadelphia on May 5, 1775, and the next day was chosen a member of the Second Continental Congress.  Fighting had broken out near Boston, and the New England militia had trapped the British army in the city. The Congress became the voice of the Americans, setting up shadow governments in each colony, getting ready for a major revolt. Militia units up and down the 13 colonies began drilling for war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin, following the lead of [[John Adams]], began preparing for independence. On July 21, 1775, he presented his scheme for the [[Articles of Confederation]], similar to his Albany Plan, which called for a strong central government and a congress with proportional representation.  However, few of his ideas were included in the Articles Congress adopted in 1777. The Patriots now controlled every colony, and incited by the clever reasoning of [[Thomas Paine]], realized that their [[republican]] values and way of life were incompatible with conytrol by foreign aristocrats in London.  As popular sentiment for independence swelled in late spring 1776, Franklin, joined [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[John Adams]], [[Roger Sherman]], and [[Robert Livingston]] as a committee to prepare a [[Declaration of Independence]].  Jefferson, the best writer, did the drafting, with Franklin offering his editorial commentary.  A new nation emerged on July 4, 1776. It had driven out all the British officials.  But they returned in force in August, 1776, seized New York City, and offered to negotiate on everything except independence.  Patriots demanded independence and refused to negotiate any other terms. Help was needed from France, so in December of 1776 Franklin was sent to Paris, along with [[Silas Deane]] and [[Arthur Lee]], to secure aid for the new nation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Along with being on the committee to draft the [[Declaration of Independence]], Franklin also proposed an idea for the national seal. His proposal was to have a picture of the Isaelites crossing the Red Sea and Pharaoh's army being destoyed by the water encircled by the phrase, &amp;quot;Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin had made his illegitimate son William Franklin, the Royal Governor of [[New Jersey]], but he remained loyal to the Crown, and father and son never reconciled. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He understood the risks the [[Founding Fathers]] were taking and told them, &amp;quot;We must all hang together, or we shall hang separately.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ambassador==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Franklin - France.jpg|right|340px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was America's first  minister (ambassador) to King [[Louis XVI]] in [[France]], where where he was instrumental in obtaining military and economic support for the struggle against Britain. Franklin arrived to great fanfare in France.  Already well-known for his lightning experiment,  his flirtatious manner and wit made him a favorite among the courtiers.  Franklin systematically mingled with scientists, writers, intellectuals and government officials in Paris. He avoided court costumes and cultivated the image of a rustic American, sometimes wearing a coonskin cap. The French loved every bit of it and his popularity helped in securing recognition, money and armies and navies to fight Britain. &lt;br /&gt;
===Diplomat===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin proved himself to be a crafty diplomat.  By the end of 1777, after the great American victory at [[Battle of Saratoga|Saratoga]], the French became confident the Americans were strong enough to prevail. The French favored an alliance with the Americans, but their ally Spain was opposed, fearing that anti-imperial republicanism might emerge ion Spain's many colonies. Franklin played on the traditional hatred between the British and the French, using the press to get his messages across.   On February 5, 1778 he officially signed a treaty of alliance with France with the stipulation that the U.S. must have France's approval to negotiate peace with Britain.  The American revolution was now a world war, and as the Netherlands and Spain joined France, and the rest remained neutral, Britain was outnumbered on land and sea and had little hope of defeating the Allies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin and John Adams did not get along. Adams that Franklin was &amp;quot;too old, too infirm, too indolent and dissipated for the discharge of all the important duties of ambassador, board of war, board of treasury, commissary of prisoners....&amp;quot; Adams did admit that the power of Franklin's name and fame made him essential, and historians generally agree Franklin did a very good job.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gorodon Wood, ''The Americanization of Benjamin Franklin'' (2004) p 192; Stacy Schiff, ''A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America'' (2005)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   French aid proved to be critical to the Americans success, most notably in the decisive victory at Yorktown in October 1781. The Revolutionary war was now won, but negotiations dragged on until the Peace of Paris was signed on Sept. 3, 1783. Franklin remarked, about this time: &amp;quot;There never was a good war nor a bad peace.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was the most traditional American diplomat of era in his tendency to approach diplomacy as a search for compromise, his use of diplomacy as a tool for peace, his insistence on working through proper channels, and his adherence to the norms of good manners and civility. He played a central role in the peace negotiations in Paris, and to the amazement of observers at the time--and historians ever since--won highly favorable terms from the British, especially ownership of all the lands east of the Mississippi River (except Florida, which went to France's ally Spain.) Assisted by diplomats [[John Jay]] and [[John Adams]], Franklin demonstrated great foresight and diplomatic aplomb in negotiating the treaty. While military victory certainly influenced the outcome, the envoys' tenacity and adroit craftsmanship nonetheless frustrated much of the great power intrigue aimed at blocking united American independence. By 1783, few European diplomats visualized an independent United States. The American emissaries, steeped in revolutionary fervor and confident after military victory, would not settle for less.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Richard Morris, ''The Peacemakers: The Great Powers and American Independence'' (1965) is the definitive history.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Disinherits his son===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1789 Franklin disinherited his only living son, William, who had been Franklin's close personal friend and, beginning in the 1750s, his political protégé. Franklin used his contacts in London to have William named royal governor of New Jersey, a lucrative and highly prestigious position. In 1774, when Franklin was fired as head of the American postal system and publicly humiliated at Whitehall, he believed his son would resign as governor to protest his father's treatment. When William failed to do this and even admonished his father to accept his fate and take a comfortable retirement, an irreparable breach was created between father and son, a rift widened by the son's loyalty to the British crown during the Revolutionary War. Although William attempted to reestablish a father-son relationship, Benjamin refused and could never forgive his son for the public nature of the humiliation he felt William had caused him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sheila L. Skemp, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin, Patriot, and William Franklin, Loyalist.&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History'' 1998 65(1): 35-45. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Building a stronger nation==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin returned home in September 1785.  Like all nationalists he could see that the Articles of Confederation created a government that was too weak to survive in a dangerous world It had no president and no tax base, for example.  Franklin's ideas for an American republic provided a reconciliation of classical republicanism and 18th-century economic life. Franklin's demographic view put America and Britain in contrast. He criticized the British emphasis on manufacturing for export, and he preferred agriculture as the best source of national wealth. Although favoring self-sufficiency, as a means for a virtuous independence, Franklin recognized the need for encouraging a vigorous foreign commerce (with free trade). Open space and open markets were essential for republicanism to work.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Drew R. McCoy, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin's Vision of a Republican Political Economy for America.&amp;quot; ''William and Mary Quarterly'' 1978 35(4): 607-628. 0043-5597&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin can be compared favorably with [[Frederick Jackson Turner]] as a promoter of the [[Frontier Thesis]], the idea of the significance of the West in the shaping of American character. Franklin used the words frontier and West interchangeably and generally equated both of them with free land. He believed that the West was decisive in producing the phenomenal population growth of the society of his day and its &amp;quot;middle-class agrarianism.&amp;quot; His frontier-inspired ideas had a demonstrable effect on public events and contributed to the coming of the American Revolution. Americans eagerly gave wide currency to Franklin's ideas. His political and diplomatic exertions contributed considerably to insure that the West would be a part of the new nation he was helping to create.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James H. Hutson, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and the West&amp;quot;. ''Western Historical Quarterly'' 1973 4(4): 425-434. 0043-3810 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1787 the [[Constitutional Convention]] convened in Philadelphia to write a new Constitution. Franklin, at age 81 the oldest delegate, played an honorific role and his support helped legitimize the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Slavery==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin in the 1750s owned two slaves, whom he eventually freed, and also ran advertisements for slave sales in his ''Pennsylvania Gazette''.  As a youth he had been a runaway himself. As a diplomat he supported slavery, but for Franklin slavery was always more of a political than a moral problem. Late in life he reversed directions and supported the abolition of the slavery trade (but not slavery itself). He joined the Pennsylvania Abolition Society and became their president in 1787; his was primarily honorific.  The Society had hoped he would bring up the issue of slavery at the Constitutional Convention, which he declined to do, realizing that it would be too contentious of an issue.  In November 1789, he published his ''Address to the Public'' which appealed for the emancipation of slaves and the further education of free blacks.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Waldstreicher, ''Runaway America: Benjamin Franklin, Slavery, and the American Revolution''(2004)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Death==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin died on April 17, 1790 at the age of 84 and was buried at Christ Church in Philadelphia.  Civic-minded to the end, Franklin's will established a 200 year trust fund for Boston and Philadelphia which was to be used to train and educate young craftsmen.  Both cities have held true to Franklin's wishes, providing aid to students and establishing the Franklin Institute of Boston.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin progressed from a skepticism towards Puritanism as a youth to a strong belief in God and prayers for His intervention.  At all times Franklin believed in God, but was unable to define what God meant for his soul; he never joined a church. Like most in Pennsylvania, he respected freedom of religion by others, but also emphasized the importance of religion in maintaining a society; much of his writing was designed to promote moral behavior. [[Liberals]] often like to bring up that  he stated  &amp;quot;lighthouses are more helpful than churches&amp;quot;, as if that is some kind of &amp;quot;proof&amp;quot; that Franklin was only a Deist. It is merely [[liberal deceit]]. The British political system at the time of the American rebellion was based very firmly on Anglican Protestantism. Laws stated very clearly the monarch had to be a protestant, and also that they were the head of The Church of England; even Protestants who were not Anglican had to pay for their own priests and build their own churches. Catholics were still denied the vote. To gather enough support among the colonists to successfully achieve independence, their leaders had to offer them something different, and to belittle the Anglican church in particular, so as to undermine the foundation of the British political system that ruled the American colonies. So, Franklin was saying that functional, useful things (such as lighthouses) contributed more to the safety and well-being of the individual than buildings that provided spiritual things (such as churches). It was his clever means of motivation, not some far-reaching personal belief of his.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Young Ben was an avid reader. &amp;quot;From a child I was fond of reading, and all the little money that came into my hands was ever laid out in books. Pleased with the ''[[Pilgrim's Progress]],'' my first collection was of [[John Bunyan]]'s works in separate little volumes.  My old favorite author, Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress ... has been translated into most of the languages of Europe, and suppose it has been more generally read than any other book, except perhaps the Bible.&amp;quot;'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1728, the twenty-two-year-old printer wrote &amp;quot;Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion,&amp;quot; which Walters (1999) argues is the most crucial text of all Franklin’s religious writings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; for the text see [http://www.beliefnet.com/resourcelib/docs/65/Articles_of_Belief_and_Acts_of_Religion_1p.html &amp;quot;Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion&amp;quot; by Benjamin Franklin, November 20, 1728]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Franklin embraced a concept that sanctioned the value of different religions. Walters argues this “theistic perspectivism” is the key to understanding Franklin’s religion, for it allowed him to maintain his most basic belief in a divinity as the &amp;quot;First Cause&amp;quot; while also allowing him to understand different religions and sects as different ways to honor and serve the primary creator. Franklin’s lifelong advocacy of religious tolerance and his refusal to dogmatize resulted from his understanding that all religions helped bring the &amp;quot;First Cause&amp;quot; closer to humanity, bridging the immense gulf between Creator and creation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kerry S. Walters, ''Benjamin Franklin and His Gods,'' (1999)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin left behind the [[deism]] of his youth.  In a draft autobiography written mostly in 1771, nearly 20 years prior to his death, Franklin described how he came to deism as a teenager. He recalled that his ''&amp;quot;parents had early given me religious impressions, and brought me through my childhood piously in the Dissenting way. But I was scarce fifteen, when, after doubting by turns of several points, as I found them disputed in the different books I read, I began to doubt of Revelation itself. Some books against Deism fell into my hands; they were said to be the substance of sermons preached at Boyle's Lectures. It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a thorough Deist.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=Fra2Aut.sgm&amp;amp;images=images/modeng&amp;amp;data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&amp;amp;tag=public&amp;amp;part=all The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, p.57&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin then abandoned his youthful deism in favor of a strong belief in an interventionist God, as reflected by his prayer request during a troubled period of the [[Constitutional Convention]].  In a letter dated March 9, 1790, the last letter Franklin ever wrote, he expressed his strong faith in God and the possibility of heaven: &lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;Here is my Creed: I believe in one God, Creator of the Universe. That he governs it by Providence. That he ought to be worshipped. That the most acceptable Service we render to him is doing good to his other Children. That the soul of Man is immortal, and will be treated with Justice in another Life respecting its conduct in in this. These I take to be the fundamental Principles of all sound Religion, and I regard them as you do in whatever sect I meet with them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;As to Jesus of Nazareth, my Opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of Morals and His Religion, as he left them to us, the best the world ever saw, or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting Changes, and I have, with most of the present Dissenters in England, some doubt as to his Divinity; tho' it is a question I need not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an Opportunity of knowing the Truth with less Trouble. I see no harm in its being believed, if that belief has the good Consequence, as probably it has, of making his Doctrines more respected and better observed; especially as I do not perceive, that the Supreme takes it amiss, by distinguishing the Unbelievers in his Government of the world with any peculiar Marks of his Displeasure.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://personal.pitnet.net/primarysources/franklin-stiles.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Whitefield===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin admired [[George Whitefield]], who first visited the colonies in 1738 and played a major role in the [[First Great Awakening]].  Franklin saw Whitefield as a fellow intellectual, but thought Whitefield's plan to run an orphanage in Georgia would lose money. Franklin published several of Whitefield's tract. He was intrigued and himself moved by Whitefield's ability to preach and speak with clarity and enthusiasm to crowds ranging in the thousands. Franklin was an ecumenist and approved of Whitefield's ability to appeal to members of many denominations.  Franklin was not moved by the Methodist evangelist's revivals, but did conclude that religiosity was a good thing for other people, so at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, he proposed a prayer for divine intervention to aid the troubled proceedings. After one of Whitefield's sermons, Franklin noted the:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;wonderful...change soon made in the manners of our inhabitants. From being thoughtless or indifferent about religion, it seem'd as if all the world were growing religious, so that one could not walk thro' the town in an evening without hearing psalms sung in different families of every street.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin,'' p.104-108;  Samuel J. Rogal, &amp;quot;Toward a Mere Civil Friendship: Benjamin Franklin and George Whitefield.&amp;quot; ''Methodist History'' 1997 35(4): 233-243. 0026-1238 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lifelong close friendship developed between the revivalist preacher and the worldly, secular humanist. Looking beyond their public images, one finds a common charity, humility, and ethical sense embedded in the character of each man. True loyalty based on genuine affection coupled with a high value placed on friendship helped their association grow even stronger over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fame== 	&lt;br /&gt;
By 1776 Franklin was the most famous American in the world. He was one of the most prominent of the Founding Fathers, early political figures and statesmen of the [[United States]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the years immediately following his death, Franklin's reputation fell upon evil days. His political enemies, as well as [[Federalist Party]], journalists systematically emphasized the less attractive aspects of his character and minimized his achievements.  The calumny was repeated until the 1850s, when the first real attempts were made to paint a broader portrait of this many-sided man. Franklin's &amp;quot;rags to riches&amp;quot; career had a natural attraction in the go-getter mood of the [[Gilded Age]] and he became the patron saint of &amp;quot;getting on,&amp;quot; a role that he has not yet lost. The xenophobia of the period also affected the image of Franklin in that his prudential philosophy appeared less an expression of selfishness than a means of achievement expressive of the best in the American national character. The late 19th century also saw the beginning of real Franklin scholarship.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Richard D. Miles, &amp;quot;The American Image of Benjamin Franklin&amp;quot; ''American Quarterly'' 1957 9(2): 117-143. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/2710628 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin is one of the few non-presidents whose likeness appears on U.S. currency. Franklin graces the $100 bill while [[Alexander Hamilton]] appears on the $10 bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1933, Isamu Noguchi (1904-88) designed a  monument to Franklin. For years,  the project languished. It finally came to fruition in  Philadelphia in 1984 as “Bolt of Lightning . . .  Memorial to Ben Franklin.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was highly regarded throughout Europe as a leader in science and diplomacy, and as the representative American and the symbol of the New World's integrity and progress. The intellectual, poltiical and scoial leaders of France viewed Franklin as the epitome of the enlightened legislator, a brilliant inventor, and perceptive economist. He inspired his contemporaries and successive generations of Frenchmen to eulogize him in the arts. His unassailable reputation also encouraged divergent political factions to claim Franklin as a mentor after his death in 1790. Franklin was a figure of the Enlightenment, two countries, and two revolutions and there are still reminders of him in France today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; J. A. Leith, &amp;quot;Le Culte de Franklin en France avant et pendant la Révolution Française,&amp;quot; [&amp;quot;France's Cult of Franklin before and during the French Revolution&amp;quot;]. ''Annales Historiques de la Révolution Française,'' 1976 226 48(4): 543-571. 0003-4436 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While most historians have admired Franklin's achievements, British literary critic [[D. H. Lawrence]] ridiculed Franklin as excessivelyt middle class. Lawrence spent time in the United States in the 1920s but came to dislike the country. He focused on Franklin as a personification of American culture in two essays. Lawrence's disdain for Franklin was based largely in their different philosophies. Franklin felt man was perfectable, and could excel through hard work, while Lawrence saw man as an imperfect, creative, fragmented being, for whom the body and emotions are central to achieving happiness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ormond Seavey, &amp;quot;D. H. Lawrence and 'The First Dummy American'.&amp;quot; ''Georgia Review'' 1985 39(1): 113-128. 0016-8386; D. H. Lawrence, ''Studies in Classic American Literature'' (1923),   [http://xroads.virginia.edu/~hyper/LAWRENCE/dhlch02.htm online edition of ch. 2 on Franklin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
===Join or Die===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Join-die.jpg|thumb|290px|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
The famous cartoon entitled &amp;quot;Join, or Die,&amp;quot; printed on 9 May 1754 in Franklin's ''Pennsylvania Gazette'', shows a sliced up rattlesnake that forms a map of the colonies.  It is impotent unless it joins together, as nature clearly intended.  Rattlesnakes--powerful and dangerous creatures that were not found in Britain--were often used to represent America.  Georgia, the newest colony,  is missing, as is Delaware (then part of Pennsylvania). The cartoon alludes to an old myth that a snake that had been cut into pieces would come back to life if the sections were reassembled before sunset,  Franklin based his cartoon on a 17th-century French emblem book by Nicolas Verrien which includes a snake divided into two parts with the motto: 'Se rejoindre ou mourir' ('Join or die').&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the idea behind the illustration was Franklin's, historians have not discovered who did the actual engraving. In form the illustration follows the plan of an emblem book illustration, with a motto, a symbolic picture, and an explanatory text; Franklin even referred to it in correspondence as an &amp;quot;emblem.&amp;quot;  Franklin was responsible for many visual creations, such as cartoons, designs for flags and paper money,&lt;br /&gt;
emblems and devices. He possessed an extraordinary knowledge of symbols and heraldry.  The snake image may be a composite of those found in Mark Catesby's ''The Natural History of Carolina, Florida, and the Bahama Islands'' (1731-43). The iconic image of national unity became widespread in political illustrations concerning the [[Stamp Act]] of 1765, the American Revolution, and both the Union and Confederate causes in the American Civil War.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Karen Severud Cook, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and the Snake that would not Die,&amp;quot; ''British Library Journal'' 1996 22 (1): 88-112. 0305-5167; Mark Bryant, &amp;quot;The First American Political Cartoon,&amp;quot; ''History Today'' v. 57#12 (December 2007) pp 58+. [http://www.questia.com/read/5024806593?title=The%20First%20American%20Political%20Cartoon online edition]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Autobiography==&lt;br /&gt;
A year after Franklin's death, his unfinished draft autobiography, entitled &amp;quot;Memoires De La Vie Privee,&amp;quot; was published in Paris in March of 1791, and portions soon appeared in English.  The first complete edition appeares in 1868.  It was one of the first and greatest American autobiographies and appears in many editions.  Historians have treated the ''Autobiography'' as an allegory for the paradigm of American upward social mobility as well as representing the early economic and political success of America. Beyond this basic representativeness, it endorses the economic promise of free enterprise by using Franklin's life experience to advocate the new nation's economic potential and creditworthiness. Franklin aligns his own history with that of the fledgling United States, in effect equating his ability to successfully capitalize on credit with that of the nation. By depicting his own public credibility, Franklin was able to translate his reputation and promise of success into an endorsement of the viability of American life, intertwining self- and national promotion.  In sharp contrast to Jefferson's glorification of the yeoman farmer as the carrier of republican virtue, Franklin looked to the cosmopolitan city for the advancement of mankind, as he tells how the youth arrives in the idyllic city of Philadelphia, where adherence to principles of independence, morality, and industry bring him success.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Jennifer Jordan Baker, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography and the Credibility of Personality.&amp;quot; ''Early American Literature'' 2000 35(3): 274-293. 0012-8163; James L. Machor, &amp;quot;The Urban Idyll of the New Republic: Moral Geography and the Mythic Hero of Franklin's Autobiography.&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography'' 1986 110(2): 219-236.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Autobiography'' gave an incomplete view of Franklin. The persona that Franklin assumed here was merely another of the several public roles he adopted in his writings and political activities. He believed that personal growth could only be accomplished by surrendering to a public function, and that the public forum should be a community for discourse rather than a marketplace for personal competition and acquisition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
* From a letter in April 1787: &amp;quot;Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;it would end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall have become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We must hang together, or most assuredly, we will hang separately.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=7mgAwXas5xIC&amp;amp;pg=PA49&amp;amp;dq=We+must+hang+together,+or+we+will+assuredly+hang+separately.&amp;amp;ei=hqEySrf_N5jeyAThoNSCBg &lt;br /&gt;
Beyond political correctness: social transformation in the United States‎ - Page 49] by Michael S. Cummings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Work as if you were to live a hundred years. Pray as if you were to die tomorrow.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ushistory.org/franklin/quotable/quote29.htm The Quotable Franklin] USHistory.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Words may show a man's wit but actions his meaning.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=A5kEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=RA2-PA601&amp;amp;dq=Words+may+show+a+man%27s+wit+but+actions+his+meaning&amp;amp;ei=Azw8SvyjM5-8zASKj7y6BQ The life of Benjamin Franklin‎ - Page 601] by Benjamin Franklin, John Bigelow&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=SrIEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA430&amp;amp;dq=I+think+the+best+way+of+doing+good+to+the+poor,+is+not+making+them+easy+in+poverty,+but+leading+or+driving+them+out+of+it.&amp;amp;ei=VfNySvOGJ6bAygTw7q2TAw Memoirs of Benjamin Franklin‎ - Page 430]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;He that is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Basic readings==&lt;br /&gt;
* Becker, Carl Lotus. &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin,&amp;quot; ''Dictionary of American Biography'' (1931) with hot links [http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/franklin.htm#becker online]&lt;br /&gt;
* Brands, Henry. ''The First American: The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin'' (2000)- excellent long scholarly biography [http://www.amazon.com/First-American-Times-Benjamin-Franklin/dp/0385495404/ref=pd_bbs_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Isaacson, Walter.  ''Benjamin Franklin: An American Life'' (2004) - good popular biography [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-American-Walter-Isaacson/dp/074325807X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ketcham, Ralph. ''Benjamin Franklin'' (1966) 228 pp[http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=34300175 online edition], by short biography by a scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Morgan, Edmund S. ''Benjamni Franklin'' (2003) the best short introduction [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-Yale-Nota-Bene/dp/0300101627/ref=pd_bbs_10?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-10 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Doren, Carl.  ''Benjamin Franklin'' (1938), standard older biography [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-Carl-Van-Doren/dp/193154185X/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222991&amp;amp;sr=8-6 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wright, Esmond.  ''Franklin of Philadelphia'' (1986) - excellent scholarly study [http://www.amazon.com/Franklin-Philadelphia-Belknap-Esmond-Wright/dp/0674318102/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203223116&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Detailed Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Becker, Carl Lotus. &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin,&amp;quot; ''Dictionary of American Biography'' (1931) -  vol 3, with hot links [http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/franklin.htm#becker online]&lt;br /&gt;
* Brands, Henry. ''The First American: The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin'' (2000)- excellent long scholarly biography [http://www.amazon.com/First-American-Times-Benjamin-Franklin/dp/0385495404/ref=pd_bbs_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Isaacson, Walter.  ''Benjamin Franklin: An American Life'' (2004) - well written popular biography [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-American-Walter-Isaacson/dp/074325807X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ketcham, Ralph. ''Benjamin Franklin'' (1966) 228 pp[http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=34300175 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morgan, Edmund S. ''Benjamni Franklin'' (2003) the best short introduction [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-Yale-Nota-Bene/dp/0300101627/ref=pd_bbs_10?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-10 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Doren, Carl.  ''Benjamin Franklin'' (1938), standard older biography [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-Carl-Van-Doren/dp/193154185X/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222991&amp;amp;sr=8-6 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wood, Gordon. ''The Americanization of Benjamin Franklin'' (2005), influential intellectual history by leading conservative historian. [http://www.amazon.com/Americanization-Benjamin-Franklin-Gordon-Wood/dp/0143035282/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1236327205&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wright, Esmond.  ''Franklin of Philadelphia'' (1986) - excellent scholarly study [http://www.amazon.com/Franklin-Philadelphia-Belknap-Esmond-Wright/dp/0674318102/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203223116&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Specialized Scholarly Studies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Anderson, Douglas.  ''The Radical Enlightenments of Benjamin Franklin''  (1997) - fresh look at the intellectual roots of Franklin&lt;br /&gt;
* Buxbaum, M.H., ed.  ''Critical Essays on Benjamin Franklin'' (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
* Chaplin, Joyce. ''The First Scientific American: Benjamin Franklin and the Pursuit of Genius.'' (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
* Cohen, I. Bernard.  ''Benjamin Franklin's Science'' (1990) - Cohen, the leading specialist, has several books on Franklin's science&lt;br /&gt;
* Conner, Paul W.  ''Poor Richard's Politicks'' (1965) - analyzes Franklin's ideas in terms of the Enlightenment and republicanism&lt;br /&gt;
* Dull, Jonathan.  ''A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution'' (1985)&lt;br /&gt;
* Ford, Paul Leicester.  ''The Many-Sided Franklin'' (1899) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-many-sided-franklin-by-paul-leicester-ford.jsp online edition] - collection of scholarly essays&lt;br /&gt;
* Lemay, J. A. Leo, ed.  ''Reappraising Benjamin Franklin: A Bicentennial Perspective'' (1993) -  scholarly essays&lt;br /&gt;
* Lemay, J. A. Leo. ''The Life of Benjamin Franklin'' the most detailed scholarly biography, with very little interpetation; 3 volumes appeared before the author's death in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
** ''Volume 1: Journalist, 1706-1730'' (2005) 568pp [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Benjamin-Franklin-Journalist-1706-1730/dp/0812238540/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
** ''Volume 2: Printer and Publisher, 1730-1747'' (2005) 664pp; [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Benjamin-Franklin-Publisher-1730-1747/dp/0812238559/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
**''Volume 3: Soldier, Scientist, and Politician, 1748-1757'' (2008), 768pp [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Benjamin-Franklin-Scientist-Politician/dp/0812241215/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1236306986&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* McCoy, Drew R. &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin's Vision of a Republican Political Economy for America.&amp;quot; ''William and Mary Quarterly'' 1978 35(4): 607-628. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1923207 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Skemp, Sheila L. ''Benjamin and William Franklin: Father and Son, Patriot and Loyalist'' (1994)- Ben's son was a leading Loyalist&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary Sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Franklin, Benjamin. ''Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin'', ed. L.W. Labaree et al. (1964) [http://www.earlyamerica.com/lives/franklin/ online edition] - there are many editions&lt;br /&gt;
* Franklin, Benjamin. ''Franklin: Writings'', ed. J.A. Leo Lemay, Library of America (1987) [http://www.amazon.com/Franklin-Writings-Library-America-Benjamin/dp/0940450291/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1207333906&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]; [http://infomotions.com/alex/?cmd=search&amp;amp;query=creator:Franklin complete text online free]&lt;br /&gt;
*Labaree, Leonard W., et al., eds., ''The Papers of Benjamin Franklin'' 35 vols. to date (1959-2002) -  definitive edition, through 1781. This massive collection of BF's writings, and letters to him, is available in print form at large research libraries. [http://www.franklinpapers.org/franklin/index.jsp?src=g1&amp;amp;gclid=CJ6my-GEwpICFSgwiQodDQldrA the complete text, searchable, is online free from Yale] It is most useful for detailed research on very specific topics.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://franklinpapers.org/franklin/ Yale edition of complete works of Benjamin Franklin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tufts.edu/as/wright_center/fellows/bob_morse_04/ The Electrical Writings of Benjamin Franklin] Collected by Robert A. Morse, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sln.fi.edu/franklin/family/lastwill.html Franklin's Last Will &amp;amp; Testament] Transcription.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/franklin.htm &amp;quot;Guide to Benjamin Franklin&amp;quot; by Richard Jensen January 2007] &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.english.udel.edu/lemay/franklin/ Leo Lemay, ed. ''&amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin: A Documentary History&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Franklin, Benjamin}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Inventors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Founding Fathers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Journalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Scientists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:diplomacy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Enlightenment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British Empire]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Charlieneal</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Benjamin_Franklin&amp;diff=1025168</id>
		<title>Benjamin Franklin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Benjamin_Franklin&amp;diff=1025168"/>
		<updated>2012-12-26T23:21:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Charlieneal: /* Early Life */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Founding Fathers&lt;br /&gt;
|image=Benjamin.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|State:=Pennsylvania							&lt;br /&gt;
|Religion:=Christian- Episcopalian (Deist) &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.adherents.com/gov/Founding_Fathers_Religion.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|Founding Documents:=[[Declaration of Independence]], &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[[United States Constitution]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Benjamin Franklin''' (January 17, 1706, [[Boston]] - April 17, 1790 [[Philadelphia]]), was an American [[polymath]], printer, inventor, statesman, and one of the most prominent scientists in the world of the [[Enlightenment]], famed for his discoveries in electricity. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He was known as &amp;quot;the First American&amp;quot; because his efforts were critical to the formation of a new nation, the success of the [[American Revolution]] and the unification of the 13 colonies into the United States of America. Serving as the American minister to France, he secured decisive military and financial support for the Revolution, while asserting the values of democracy and [[republicanism]]. He assisted [[Thomas Jefferson]] in writing the [[Declaration of Independence]] in 1776 and helped legitimize the [[U.S. Constitution]] in 1787.  His effective diplomacy, creative nationalism, promotion of civic virtue and devotion to [[republicanism]] earned him the top tier as a [[Founding Father]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early Life==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was born on January 17, 1706 in [[Boston]], [[Massachusetts]] into a Puritan family.  His father was Josiah Franklin, a soap and candle maker, who was married twice and had 17 children.  Benjamin briefly attended the very good South Grammar School (affiliated with the Boston Latin School), then at age 10 was pulled out by his father. He was apprenticed at age 12 to his brother James Franklin  (1697-1735), one of the first American printers.  James published ''[[New England Courant]]'' and it became Ben's first public forum for his essays, written under the pseudonym &amp;quot;Silence Dogood.&amp;quot;  Ben, pretending to be a widow, wrote 14 essays in 1722.  The essays drew the anger of the local authorities, who prohibited James from publishing it, citing that it mocked religion.  Ben, now aged 17, was under legal obligation to his brother but broke with him, and ran away to Philadelphia on his own.  Franklin visited his many relatives in Boston in 1733  and reconciled with his brother, and when James died at the age of 38, Ben helped his widow and took charge of James' oldest son.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Philadelphia Printer ==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin found work at a print shop in Philadelphia and soon was patronized by governor William Keith, who persuaded Franklin that he needed to go into business for himself and offered him letters of credit in London to purchase equipment.  When he arrived in London in December 1724, he learned that Keith's letters of credit were useless.  Ben stayed in London, working in the local print shops.  In 1726, he returned to Philadelphia and again worked in print shops. In 1728, Franklin partnered with Hugh Meredith to opened their own print shop.  Franklin soon bought out Meredith and in 1730 began publishing ''The Pennsylvania Gazette'' newspaper, which he bought from his former employer, Samuel Keimer.  Besides the newspaper and almanac, he was a job printer and churned out pamphlets, religious tracts, playbills, tickets, advertisements, legal forms, soap wrappers, election notices, currency, carrier addresses, government documents, book labels, and other ephemeral items.  In his leisure moments he taught himself to read French, Spanish, Italian, and Latin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Almanack===&lt;br /&gt;
In late 1732, he began writing and publishing ''Poor Richard's Almanack'', under the guise of &amp;quot;Poor Richard Saunders&amp;quot; and his wife, Bridget, both fictional characters.  The almanack provided useful information on the seasons while enlightening the reader with witty short sayings. Franklin had a knack for rewording and improving old proverbs in a wittier manner. The almanac appeared annually from 1732 to 1758, selling over 250,000 copies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''Poor Richard's Almanack'' shaped provincial society by trumpeting the virtuous common man and by pushing such men into active roles in the public sphere. ''Poor Richard'' outsold competing almanacs published by Atkins, Leeds, Taylor, Jerman, Birkett, and Godfrey by appealing to and providing information for the masses. In the process, Franklin spread the Whig ideology that became American [[republicanism]] to his readers. He praised them for having a better intuitive political knowledge and devotion to republican virtue than those in higher social positions. While trying to open the public sphere to men of ability (like himself), Franklin closed it to women, the poor, and non-English nationalities and races. By discussing Pennsylvania politics and other issues, ''Poor Richard's Almanack'' sought to transform its readers into diligent citizens who would help develop a politically active private sphere within colonial America.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; William Pencak, &amp;quot;Politics and Ideololgy in Poor Richard's Almanack&amp;quot;. ''Pennsylvania Magazine Ideologyof History and Biography'' 1992 116(2): 183-211&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
==National communications network==&lt;br /&gt;
One long-term project was creating a network of printers, especially using his own apprentices who would move to other cities to establish themselves. The network of allied printer-publishers extended from New England to the West Indies and lasted from 1729 to the 1790s. It composed his relatives and business associates. It financed printers, played a vital role in developing American journalism, and influenced American morals and ethics by widely disseminating Franklin's ideology of virtue. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon finding apprentices whose diligence, skill, and character impressed him, Franklin would make them partners, often setting them up in printing businesses of their own. Subsequently, he would use them to expand his business associations, and as deputy postmaster-general for North America he would set up his associates as postmasters in their local areas. Postmasters were the first to receive news and could communicate it quickly to Franklin through their free use of the postal system. By building and using his communications network Franklin was able to both keep abreast of important developments in the colonies and build a network of supporters and admirers who influenced public opinion in their own cities.  As the revolutionary era began, Franklin opposed colonial independence from Britain. Network infighting ensued, pitting Loyalist printers Thomas Wharton and Joseph Galloway against pro-independence publisher William Goddard, who created a private system to deliver his papers that became a model for the US Postal Service. The Continental Congress later appointed Franklin postmaster general, and he, not Goddard, received credit for America's postal system. In 1768, reacting to the Stamp and Townshend acts, Franklin became an activist in the Patriot cause. Many network printers, such as David Hall and James Holt, followed suit, as the colonists polarized between Patriots and Loyalists. As revolt approached, network newspapers became influential foes of Britain. War, turmoil, and Franklin's diplomatic absence while in France caused the network eventually to dissolve, and be replaced by networks of party newspapers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ralph Frasca,  &amp;quot;'The Glorious Publick Virtue so Predominant in Our Rising Country': Benjamin Franklin's Printing Network During the Revolutionary Era.&amp;quot; ''American Journalism'' 1996 13(1): 21-37. 0882-1127; Frasca, ''Benjamin Franklin's Printing Network: Disseminating Virtue in Early America'' (2006) [http://www.questia.com/read/111742668?title=Benjamin%20Franklin's%20Printing%20Network%3a%20Disseminating%20Virtue%20in%20Early%20America online edition]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Marriage==&lt;br /&gt;
In September 1730, Franklin entered a common law marriage with Deborah Read. No legal ceremony was possible because Deborah was still legally married; her husband had deserted to avoid paying a debt. Around this time, Franklin fathered an illegitimate son by an unknown woman; [[William Franklin]] was raised in his new household.  In 1732, his first son with Deborah, Francis died of smallpox at the age of 4, leading Franklin to become an advocate of vaccinations.  Sarah Franklin, who went by Sally, was born 11 years later in 1743. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Civic leader==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin became Philadelphia's leading citizen, founding and leading many civic organizations.  He was the founder of the American tradition of boosterism, as well as a systematic thinker who analyzed urban problems in the context of rapid population growth.  Franklin's understanding of and solution for the urban problems of a growing Philadelphia shaped his later ideas about city-country relationships and his pessimism regarding the future of the United States. Beginning in the 1730s, Franklin actively and publicly addressed such issues as the link between the environment and disease, fire prevention, pollution from tanneries, and restoring the water system in the center of the city (called the Dock) through various engineering projects. Franklin helped improve fire safety and waste handling by mid-century, but manufacturing interests could not be controlled. Franklin believed America would eventually exhaust its vast supply of open, unpopulated land and become increasingly urbanized and demographically imbalanced, thereby making Philadelphia's problems the nation's.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; A. Michal McMahon, &amp;quot;'Small Matters': Benjamin Franklin, Philadelphia, and the 'Progress of Cities.'&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography'' 1992 116(2): 157-182. 0031-4587 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After 1727 Franklin typically operated through &amp;quot;the Junto&amp;quot;, an informal club comprising friends, civil leaders and fellow tradesmen.  He established America's first subscription library, the Library Company of Philadelphia, in 1731.  In 1736, he organized the first volunteer fire department, the Union Fire Company.  In 1743, he expanded the idea of the Junto to all of the colonies by organizing the [[American Philosophical Society]].  He helped fund the first hospital and planned a professional police force.&lt;br /&gt;
===Moral reform===&lt;br /&gt;
During the 1730s Franklin made a determined effort to use the emerging power of his press to clean up both private character and public space by writing against the excesses of drink, alehouses, fairs, gambling, and other idle pursuits. Franklin's focus on the body and its potential excess is reflective of a transformation in body image and self-image that was part of a broader range of religious, economic, and political transformations that emerged in the 18th century. All were part of a challenge to the traditional authority of church and state; the growth of commerce, the market, and the print public sphere; and the proliferation of a political ideology that presaged the Declaration of Independence. In his ''Autobiography'' (1771) Franklin utilized the body and its &amp;quot;inclinations&amp;quot; to drive his narrative. In contrast to [[Thomas Jefferson]], who appealed to abstract human rights, and [[John Adams]], who invoked historical precedent and English canon law, Franklin portrayed the Revolution as an ongoing struggle between inclination and reason.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Betsy Erkkila, &amp;quot;Franklin and the Revolutionary Body.&amp;quot; ''ELH'' (English Literary History) 2000 67(3): 717-741. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/30031934 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin did not derive his ideas on ethics and virtue from Puritan thought.  The orthodox Puritans stressed the concept of a &amp;quot;double calling,&amp;quot; one which distinguishes between an outward calling and an inward one. For the Puritan, the inward calling - through which man is justified by God's grace - took precedence over the outward calling - man's commitment to the world. [[Cotton Mather]]'s &amp;quot;Bonifacius,&amp;quot; which Franklin cites as an influence in the development of his own philosophy, maintains this distinction. Franklin's commitment is to the outward calling. He rejects the central doctrines of Puritanism: Providence, Election, and Original Sin. Franklin actually retained few Puritan ideals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Campbell Tatham, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin, Cotton Mather and the Outward State.&amp;quot; ''Early American Literature'' 1972 6(3): 223-233. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/25070534 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin's moral theories stemmed from a commonly held concept among 18th-century [[Enlightenment]] philosophers: that the development of habit can be used for achieving behavioral change. Franklin's approach to the gaining of moral progress was neopagan rather than Christian in its orientation. It stressed the gradual modification of the person's observable actions instead of an emphasis on internal spiritual change. In essence, Franklin's attitude toward habit and moral improvement was almost identical to that later espoused by [[John Stuart Mill]] and the utilitarian and associationist schools of philosophy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Norman S. Fiering, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and the Way to Virtue&amp;quot;. ''American Quarterly'' 1978 30(2): 199-223. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/2712323 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Library===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was the main organizer of the Library Company of Philadelphia, founded in 1731 by middle class &amp;quot;artificers,&amp;quot; (craftsmen, like printers, and owners of small businesses). They sought to improve their condition and status through self-education. The library reflected Franklin's belief that reading could change expectations and positions in society. The books at the library were extremely important in Franklin's intellectual development, and his experience there strengthened his beliefs about education. Through the library, members pursued many interests and became involved in natural science through Peter Collinson of London, who acted as its book agent. Nonmembers of both sexes also used the library.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Boudreau,  &amp;quot;'Highly Valuable And Extensively Useful': Community and Readership among the Eighteenth-Century Philadelphia Middling Sort.&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History'' 1996 63(3): 302-329.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin's 1749 &amp;quot;Proposals for the Education of Youth in Pensilvania,&amp;quot; in which he proposes the formation of an academy and discusses its basically secular curriculum. Religion is to be taught under the rubric of history:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;History ''will also afford frequent Opportunities of showing the Necessity of a ''Publick Religion,'' from its Usefulness to the Publick; the advantage of a Religious Character among private Persons; the Mischiefs of Superstition, &amp;amp;c. and the Excellency of the CHRISTIAN RELIGION above all others, ancient and modern.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not a college man, Franklin proposed educational changes that broke decisively with many traditional educational practices of his day. His proposals reflect his own view of the Enlightenment and its perception of the human mind. He helped establish of the &amp;quot;College of Philadelphia&amp;quot; (now the [[University of Pennsylvania. Unlike Harvard and Yale it was nonsectarian and did not primarily train clergy. Instead it educated students for careers in the professions and business and for public service. It established America's first modern liberal arts curriculum.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; George W. Boudreau, &amp;quot;'Done by a Tradesman': Franklin's Educational Proposals and the Culture Of Eighteenth-Century Pennsylvania.&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History'' 2002 69(4): 524-557. 0031-4528; see [http://www.upenn.edu/about/heritage.php online]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
===Militia===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin helped create the Pennsylvania Militia, independent of the colonial government.  The repeated [[French and Indian Wars]] were a threat to the frontier, as the French based in Canada organized and armed Indians who raided the frontier settlements.  The government was controlled by the Penn family and the [[Quakers]], who refused to organize any military defense.  In November 1747, Franklin wrote ''Plain Truth'' advocating the creation of a defense force, since the government would not do so.  The pamphlet was enthusiastically received and Franklin organized the &amp;quot;Association&amp;quot; in 1747 to defend against attacks on settlements along the Delaware River. It was the first volunteer militia in Pennsylvania.  By the end of 1747 ten volunteer regiments, composed of 124 volunteer companies (designed to have 50-100 men each), had been raised. But the militia was organized only after long debate, much of which involved biblical comparisons and religious justifications from both supporters (including Franklin) and opponents of military preparedness. The debate foreshadowed the ultimate demise of Quaker rule in Pennsylvania, since the Quaker legislators realized their refusal to defend the colony meant they had to resign office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Barbara A. Gannon, &amp;quot;The Lord is a Man of War, The God of Love and Peace: The Association Debate, Philadelphia 1747-1748.&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History 1998'' 65(1): 46-61. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Opposes multiculturalism===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin had a vision of an ethnically homogeneous America, and so he had negative views on the large and expanding German community in Pennsylvania (usually called the &amp;quot;Pennsylvania Dutch.&amp;quot;)  Franklin's first contacts with the Pennsylvania Germans concerned business. In 1731 he printed two books in German for German Baptists; he also printed into pamphlet form a letter from Conrad Weiser, an Indian negotiator, to Christopher Sauer, a German-language publisher. However, in from the late 1740s into the 1750s, Franklin believed that the Germans could not be assimilated into Englishmen and thus would always be aliens. He disliked the failure of the Germans to assimilate--they had their own language, religion and customs, and showed no interest in becoming like Englishmen or in joining the militia.  In &amp;quot;Observations on the Increase of Mankind&amp;quot; (1751), Franklin expressed his opposition toward German immigrants, whom he ridiculed:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;why should the Palatine Boors be suffered to swarm into our Settlements and, by herding together, establish their Language and Manners, to the Exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Angli-fying them .. .?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite Franklin's fears, German settlers helped secure the colony's borders against France's Indian supporters during the French and Indian War. Franklin's 1751 remarks came back to haunt him during the 1764 election to determine whether Pennsylvania would remain a proprietary colony or become a royal one (as Franklin advocated) when Franklin's opponents used his comments about the German colonists to defeat his position. Franklin kept silent about the Germans. He was pleased that the Reformed and Lutheran Germans supported the French and Indian War (1757-63) and, even more important, the American Revolution (1775-1783), even as the numerous German pacifist sects like the Dunkers, Amish and Mennonites remained neutral. Franklin and the Germans finally were reconciled in 1787 when Franklin College (now Franklin and Marshall College), was established to promote an better knowledge of the German and English languages, and was named in his honor by the Germans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; John B. Frantz, &amp;quot;Franklin and the Pennsylvania Germans&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History'' 1998 65(1): 21-34. 0031-4528; Glenn Weaver, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and the Pennsylvania Germans,&amp;quot; ''William and Mary Quarterly'' Vol. 14, No. 4 (Oct., 1957), pp. 536-559 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1918520 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to British conquest of French-speaking Quebec in 1759, he wrote &amp;quot;The Canada Pamphlet.&amp;quot; It stands as one of the most complex and sophisticated pieces of pre-Revolutionary American thought. In it, Franklin entertained ideas of a homogeneous American population in manners, language, and religion as a reaction against ethnic and political warfare within Europe. Drawing on the ideas of [[Thomas Hobbes]], [[David Hume]], and [[Baruch Spinoza]], Franklin believed that political and ethnic relations were exclusively dominated by power, leaving no room for multiculturalism in America, preferring instead the implementation of the British Crown model to foster internal peace in the colonies.  Having a reputation as anti-German hurt Franklin politically, and he dropped the nativism after 1765.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Alberto Lena, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin's 'Canada Pamphlet' or 'The Ravings of a Mad Prophet': Nationalism, Ethnicity and Imperialism.&amp;quot; ''European Journal of American Culture'' 2001 20(1): 36-49. 1466-0407 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Demography===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1751 Franklin wrote &amp;quot;Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, Etc.&amp;quot; in which he both anticipated the [[Robert Malthus|Malthusian]] theory of population growth and quite accurately predicted the rate of American population increase for the following century and a half. He showed that the American population doubled every 25 years, while Europe and Asia were static or grew very slowly. England's population supposedly took 360 years to double.  There is a paradox in Franklin's treatment of population. He maintained that the tendency of populations to expand until checked by the lack of subsistence was a cause of European miseries, yet he advocated rapid population growth for the American colonies. When his population theory is highlighted, he appears as a Malthusian pessimist; when his population values are highlighted, he appears as an ardent pro-natalist. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dennis Hodgson, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin on Population: From Policy to Theory,&amp;quot; ''Population and Development Review,''  Vol. 17, No. 4 (Dec., 1991), pp. 639-661 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/1973600 in JSTOR]; Alfred Owen Aldridge, &amp;quot;Franklin as Demographer,&amp;quot; ''Journal of Economic History,'' Vol. 9, No. 1 (May, 1949), pp. 25-44 [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2113719 in JSTOR] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Science and invention ==&lt;br /&gt;
By age 42, Franklin was wealthy enough to retire from publishing and devote most of his time to his scientific pursuits, keeping in touch with the leading scientists in Britain and the Continent.  Franklin combined commonsense empiricism, always paying very close attention to details and carefully recording his measurements. At the same time he was insatiably speculative, theoretical, and conjectural. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin's numerous inventions include bifocal glasses&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; see   [http://www.antiquespectacles.com/topics/franklin/franklin.htm illustration]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the glass armonica, the flexible catheter, the odometer, and swimming fins. &lt;br /&gt;
===Stove===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1742 he invented a device inserted into a fireplace that gave more warmth at a lower fuel cost. His idea, worked out with his friend Robert Grace, consisted of a low stove, equipped with loosely fitting iron plates through which air circulated and was warmed before it entered the room. This &amp;quot;New Pennsylvania Fireplace&amp;quot; avoided drafts, gave more   even temperatures throughout the room, and checked loss of heat through the chimney.  It was an insert in an already existing hearth, and did not resemble what are now called &amp;quot;Franklin stoves&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Meteorology===&lt;br /&gt;
The first contributions to scientific meteorology in America were Franklin's famous experiments regarding lightning, atmospheric electricity, cyclone theory, and ocean circulation, during the years from 1748 to 1775. Franklin designed the experiment that proved that electric sparks created artificially in the laboratory  were similar to deadly and destructive lightning bolts, except in magnitude. He proved that there were electric charges in the atmosphere both in cloudy (or thunder) weather and in fine weather. Franklin showed that storms may move   progressively &amp;quot;into the wind,&amp;quot; by observing that a cyclonic storm with a northeast wind hit Philadelphia a day or so before it hit Boston, which lies to the northeast of Philadelphia. Finally, while crossing the Atlantic between 1746 and 1775, and after discussions with his cousin a ship captain, he reported there is a warm current off the New England coast setting to the northeast--the [[Gulf Stream]]--and was able to chart its boundaries fairly accurately.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Discovering electricity===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin's great scientific achievement came in his experiments and theories regarding [[electricity]].  He was first intrigued by the concept after meeting Archibald Spencer and witnessing his demonstrations on the creation of static electricity. In 1747, Spencer donated a glass tube and information on generating electricity to the Library Company.  Franklin had several of these glass devices made for his experiments.  He theorized that electricity was one &amp;quot;fluid.&amp;quot;  He discovered that when a &amp;quot;positive&amp;quot; charge is created that a &amp;quot;negative&amp;quot; charge is created as well, which became known as the [[conservation of charge]].  He also began using [[Leyden jar]]s, a glass jar with foil on the outside and a conductor such as water or metal on the inside that could be charged with a wire.  Franklin determined that the charge was not stored in the conductor, as was previously thought, and was held in the glass.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;We now know that the Leyden jar is an early form of the [[capacitor]], that the charge is contained in a layer of the conductor facing the glass and that the glass (the [[dielectricum]]) increases the [[capacitance]] of the jar (amount of charge that can be held).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Based on this knowledge, he invented the first electrical battery, which was a series of glass planks that were flanked by metal and wired together.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Franklin - kite.jpg|left|360px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin began noticing the similar properties of [[lightning]] and electrical sparks, which led to his most famous experiment.  In 1750, Franklin outlined his proposal in two letters to Peter Collinson, which were published and presented to the Royal Society in London. On May 10, 1752 French scientist [[Thomas-François D'Alibard]] successfully performed Franklin's experiment outside of Paris.  In June, before word of success had crossed the Atlantic, Franklin performed his kite and key experiment with his son, William, with similar success, which has become a popular part of American folklore.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; See [http://www.mos.org/sln/toe/kite.html], [http://www.thebakken.org/electricity/franklin-kite.html]  and [http://www2.fi.edu/exhibits/permanent/electricity.php]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led to the invention of lightning rods [http://fi.edu/franklin/inventor/images/rod.jpg], which became widespread in the colonies, as well as Europe, bringing international fame to Franklin almost overnight.  In 1753, he received honorary degrees from both Harvard and Yale, and the Royal Society in London awarded him the prestigious [[Copley Medal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin is responsible for the nomenclature of &amp;quot;positive&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;negative&amp;quot; charge. He believed he could tell the direction in which electricity traveled by observing sparks. He was wrong; the electrons, which are the particles carrying ordinary [[electricity]], move in the opposite of the direction he thought they did. As a result, when electrons were discovered, according to Franklin's designation they had to be considered as having a negative charge.&lt;br /&gt;
===Controversies===&lt;br /&gt;
There were many rivalries among scientists of the day and Franklin joined in energetically. At every point of Franklin's career, rival scientists disputed his claims to inventions and disagreed with his scientific results. Abbé Nollet, the leader of the French scientific community, reported on experiments which he believed illustrated the shortcomings of Franklin's research on electricity. Nollet maintained that Franklin's lightning rods might ignite fires by attracting electricity. Various European scientists claimed to have thought of Franklin's kite or lightning rod experiments before Franklin. Leading British experimenter William Watson claimed that most of Franklin's ideas had their origins in his own work. Political controversy swirled in England in 1772 when members of the Royal Society debated whether lightning rods should be &amp;quot;points&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;blunts.&amp;quot; George III entered the controversy by demanding that blunts should be placed on the royal palace after an official committee, of which Franklin was a member, recommended pointed rods to protect the government powder magazine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; I. Bernard Cohen, &amp;quot;Franklin's Scientist Enemies: Real or Imagined&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History'' 1998 65(1): 7-20. 0031-4528 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Albany Plan of Union 1754==&lt;br /&gt;
While Franklin thought of himself as a loyal subject, and was comfortable with monarchy and aritocracy, he did express an emerging sense of Americanism.  In 1753, London promoted Franklin to the position of Deputy Postmaster for the Colonies.  The industrious Franklin, who frequently took inspection tours throughout the colonies, revamped the postal system to be more efficient, speeding up delivery times and creating the home delivery system.  From visiting the colonies first hand, coupled with the increasing need for frontier defense, Franklin realized that some form of unification of the colonies was necessary.  In June 1754, a conference was called by the London Board of Trade to meet in Albany, New York to discuss a more unified defense.  He proposed the &amp;quot;Albany Plan of Union&amp;quot;, which would have united the colonies under a royal governor, and given the colonies the power to tax themselves. Delegates from several colonies had come together to discuss ways to restore harmonious relations with the Indians but soon found themselves debating Franklin's plan of union, which would have created a unified colonial entity. The Plan was approved by the conference but was unanimously rejected by the colonial assemblies and by London. It was twenty years too soon for the colonies to give up their smug complacency and dependence upon London, rather than each other.  In 1754 colonists assumed Britain was a benevolent empire run for the benefit of colonists, but within twenty years realized their error. The Albany plan formed much of the basis for the later American governments established by the [[Articles of Confederation]] and the Constitution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politician==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1751, after serving as a clerk 15 years, Franklin was elected to the Pennsylvania Assembly.  He used his new position to advance civic projects such as pushing legislation to maintain and light the streets.  One of the primary issues faced by the Assembly was keeping their frontier border safe from Indian attacks orchestrated by the French.  There was frequent conflict between the Assembly and the Proprietary leadership of the Penn family.  The Penns controlled a vast majority of the lands in Pennsylvania, however, forbid them to be taxed which hampered the Assembly's ability to build an adequate militia.  Penn repeatedly fought the Penn family and tried, without success, to have the King take direct control of Pennsylvania.&lt;br /&gt;
==Colonial agent in London==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1757 Franklin was sent to London as the paid representative or lobbyist of the Pennsylvania Assembly to present the colony's side of its controversy with the Penn family, which still owned the colony. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His attempts to persuade this to both Thomas Penn and Parliament failed.  Although his mission was over by 1758, Franklin lingered in London for another four years.  He enjoyed his time meeting with the local intellectuals and political radicals, and with a touch of regret returned to Philadelphia in 1762.  His return to Philadelphia was to be short-lived.  In the 1764 elections, Franklin failed to be reelected after a vicious pamphlet war labeled him as anti-German and Scottish, which made up a majority of Pennsylvania's frontier population.  He found this to be a blessing in disguise when the Assembly elected to send him back to London to serve as their agent once again.  He tried and failed to obtain a recall of the Penn charter. Franklin also became the paid agent in London for Georgia in 1768, for New Jersey in 1769, and for Massachusetts in 1770. These appointments, together with his wide reputation, made Franklin a sort of ambassador extraordinary from the American colonies to Britain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He remained abroad for eighteen years, not returning to American until 1775. He was invited to join the &amp;quot;Lunar Society&amp;quot; in [[Birmingham]], where he met many intellectuals and leaders of the emerging [[Industrial Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Stamp Act===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Benjamin Franklin 1767.jpg|thumb|Benjamin Franklin, 1767.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1765, he blundered by assuring British politicians that Americans would accept the [[Stamp Act]].  He sent a letter to Philadelphia that was made public urging the colonies to simply make the best of it, leading to the misconception that Franklin had something to do with authoring the Stamp Act.  News of colonial protest caused him to reverse his position and he helped negotiated trepeal of the hated tax.  Afterwards, Franklin regularly opposed British attempts to tax the colonies, arguing that the colonists had the same rights as other British subjects, with the ability to govern and tax through an elected legislature.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In June 1767, Parliament passed the [[Townshend Act]], another tax on colonial goods.  Franklin, still loyal to the crown, took a moderate approach - simultaneously criticizing the rash colonials and the rash government. Increasing the great divide was representation in parliament. Americans had none. &lt;br /&gt;
===Hutchinson letters===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1773, Franklin somehow obtained the originals of secret letters written written 1767-1769 by Thomas Hutchinson when he was Chief Justice of Massachusetts to a member of the British government soliciting troops and urging abridgment of American liberties. Franklin sent the letters to friends in the colony, who in turn published them.  His intent was to pin the blame on people like Hutchinson for encouraging the unpopular policies, which he hoped would promote a spirit of reconciliation with Britain.  He misjudged the situation, however, which led to the Massachusetts Assembly demanding that Parliament remove Hutchinson from his governorship. London by now had lost all patience with the American colonies and had embarked on a series of punishments designed to humiliate the Americans and make them stay in their inferior places. London sent more troops to Boston and brought Franklin before the Privy Council where he was viciously humiliated in public on January 29, 1775.  He was stripped of his position of postmaster. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin's political roles in London in 1757-62 and 1764-75 reshaped his political views. Although he loved the scientists and intellectuals, he hated the politicians. He came to see Britain as vain and corrupt, and he returned to his native America in 1775 with the hope that in a still-uncorrupted republic virtue might prevail.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Esmond Wright, &amp;quot;'The Fine and Noble China Vase, The British  Empire': Benjamin Franklin's 'Love-Hate' View of  England&amp;quot;. ''Pennsylvania Magazine of History And Biography''  1987 111(4): 435-464.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Continental Congress===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin arrived back in Philadelphia on May 5, 1775, and the next day was chosen a member of the Second Continental Congress.  Fighting had broken out near Boston, and the New England militia had trapped the British army in the city. The Congress became the voice of the Americans, setting up shadow governments in each colony, getting ready for a major revolt. Militia units up and down the 13 colonies began drilling for war.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin, following the lead of [[John Adams]], began preparing for independence. On July 21, 1775, he presented his scheme for the [[Articles of Confederation]], similar to his Albany Plan, which called for a strong central government and a congress with proportional representation.  However, few of his ideas were included in the Articles Congress adopted in 1777. The Patriots now controlled every colony, and incited by the clever reasoning of [[Thomas Paine]], realized that their [[republican]] values and way of life were incompatible with conytrol by foreign aristocrats in London.  As popular sentiment for independence swelled in late spring 1776, Franklin, joined [[Thomas Jefferson]], [[John Adams]], [[Roger Sherman]], and [[Robert Livingston]] as a committee to prepare a [[Declaration of Independence]].  Jefferson, the best writer, did the drafting, with Franklin offering his editorial commentary.  A new nation emerged on July 4, 1776. It had driven out all the British officials.  But they returned in force in August, 1776, seized New York City, and offered to negotiate on everything except independence.  Patriots demanded independence and refused to negotiate any other terms. Help was needed from France, so in December of 1776 Franklin was sent to Paris, along with [[Silas Deane]] and [[Arthur Lee]], to secure aid for the new nation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Along with being on the committee to draft the [[Declaration of Independence]], Franklin also proposed an idea for the national seal. His proposal was to have a picture of the Isaelites crossing the Red Sea and Pharaoh's army being destoyed by the water encircled by the phrase, &amp;quot;Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to God.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin had made his illegitimate son William Franklin, the Royal Governor of [[New Jersey]], but he remained loyal to the Crown, and father and son never reconciled. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He understood the risks the [[Founding Fathers]] were taking and told them, &amp;quot;We must all hang together, or we shall hang separately.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ambassador==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Franklin - France.jpg|right|340px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was America's first  minister (ambassador) to King [[Louis XVI]] in [[France]], where where he was instrumental in obtaining military and economic support for the struggle against Britain. Franklin arrived to great fanfare in France.  Already well-known for his lightning experiment,  his flirtatious manner and wit made him a favorite among the courtiers.  Franklin systematically mingled with scientists, writers, intellectuals and government officials in Paris. He avoided court costumes and cultivated the image of a rustic American, sometimes wearing a coonskin cap. The French loved every bit of it and his popularity helped in securing recognition, money and armies and navies to fight Britain. &lt;br /&gt;
===Diplomat===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin proved himself to be a crafty diplomat.  By the end of 1777, after the great American victory at [[Battle of Saratoga|Saratoga]], the French became confident the Americans were strong enough to prevail. The French favored an alliance with the Americans, but their ally Spain was opposed, fearing that anti-imperial republicanism might emerge ion Spain's many colonies. Franklin played on the traditional hatred between the British and the French, using the press to get his messages across.   On February 5, 1778 he officially signed a treaty of alliance with France with the stipulation that the U.S. must have France's approval to negotiate peace with Britain.  The American revolution was now a world war, and as the Netherlands and Spain joined France, and the rest remained neutral, Britain was outnumbered on land and sea and had little hope of defeating the Allies.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin and John Adams did not get along. Adams that Franklin was &amp;quot;too old, too infirm, too indolent and dissipated for the discharge of all the important duties of ambassador, board of war, board of treasury, commissary of prisoners....&amp;quot; Adams did admit that the power of Franklin's name and fame made him essential, and historians generally agree Franklin did a very good job.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gorodon Wood, ''The Americanization of Benjamin Franklin'' (2004) p 192; Stacy Schiff, ''A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America'' (2005)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   French aid proved to be critical to the Americans success, most notably in the decisive victory at Yorktown in October 1781. The Revolutionary war was now won, but negotiations dragged on until the Peace of Paris was signed on Sept. 3, 1783. Franklin remarked, about this time: &amp;quot;There never was a good war nor a bad peace.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was the most traditional American diplomat of era in his tendency to approach diplomacy as a search for compromise, his use of diplomacy as a tool for peace, his insistence on working through proper channels, and his adherence to the norms of good manners and civility. He played a central role in the peace negotiations in Paris, and to the amazement of observers at the time--and historians ever since--won highly favorable terms from the British, especially ownership of all the lands east of the Mississippi River (except Florida, which went to France's ally Spain.) Assisted by diplomats [[John Jay]] and [[John Adams]], Franklin demonstrated great foresight and diplomatic aplomb in negotiating the treaty. While military victory certainly influenced the outcome, the envoys' tenacity and adroit craftsmanship nonetheless frustrated much of the great power intrigue aimed at blocking united American independence. By 1783, few European diplomats visualized an independent United States. The American emissaries, steeped in revolutionary fervor and confident after military victory, would not settle for less.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Richard Morris, ''The Peacemakers: The Great Powers and American Independence'' (1965) is the definitive history.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Disinherits his son===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1789 Franklin disinherited his only living son, William, who had been Franklin's close personal friend and, beginning in the 1750s, his political protégé. Franklin used his contacts in London to have William named royal governor of New Jersey, a lucrative and highly prestigious position. In 1774, when Franklin was fired as head of the American postal system and publicly humiliated at Whitehall, he believed his son would resign as governor to protest his father's treatment. When William failed to do this and even admonished his father to accept his fate and take a comfortable retirement, an irreparable breach was created between father and son, a rift widened by the son's loyalty to the British crown during the Revolutionary War. Although William attempted to reestablish a father-son relationship, Benjamin refused and could never forgive his son for the public nature of the humiliation he felt William had caused him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sheila L. Skemp, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin, Patriot, and William Franklin, Loyalist.&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania History'' 1998 65(1): 35-45. &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Building a stronger nation==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin returned home in September 1785.  Like all nationalists he could see that the Articles of Confederation created a government that was too weak to survive in a dangerous world It had no president and no tax base, for example.  Franklin's ideas for an American republic provided a reconciliation of classical republicanism and 18th-century economic life. Franklin's demographic view put America and Britain in contrast. He criticized the British emphasis on manufacturing for export, and he preferred agriculture as the best source of national wealth. Although favoring self-sufficiency, as a means for a virtuous independence, Franklin recognized the need for encouraging a vigorous foreign commerce (with free trade). Open space and open markets were essential for republicanism to work.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Drew R. McCoy, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin's Vision of a Republican Political Economy for America.&amp;quot; ''William and Mary Quarterly'' 1978 35(4): 607-628. 0043-5597&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin can be compared favorably with [[Frederick Jackson Turner]] as a promoter of the [[Frontier Thesis]], the idea of the significance of the West in the shaping of American character. Franklin used the words frontier and West interchangeably and generally equated both of them with free land. He believed that the West was decisive in producing the phenomenal population growth of the society of his day and its &amp;quot;middle-class agrarianism.&amp;quot; His frontier-inspired ideas had a demonstrable effect on public events and contributed to the coming of the American Revolution. Americans eagerly gave wide currency to Franklin's ideas. His political and diplomatic exertions contributed considerably to insure that the West would be a part of the new nation he was helping to create.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James H. Hutson, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and the West&amp;quot;. ''Western Historical Quarterly'' 1973 4(4): 425-434. 0043-3810 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1787 the [[Constitutional Convention]] convened in Philadelphia to write a new Constitution. Franklin, at age 81 the oldest delegate, played an honorific role and his support helped legitimize the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Slavery==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin in the 1750s owned two slaves, whom he eventually freed, and also ran advertisements for slave sales in his ''Pennsylvania Gazette''.  As a youth he had been a runaway himself. As a diplomat he supported slavery, but for Franklin slavery was always more of a political than a moral problem. Late in life he reversed directions and supported the abolition of the slavery trade (but not slavery itself). He joined the Pennsylvania Abolition Society and became their president in 1787; his was primarily honorific.  The Society had hoped he would bring up the issue of slavery at the Constitutional Convention, which he declined to do, realizing that it would be too contentious of an issue.  In November 1789, he published his ''Address to the Public'' which appealed for the emancipation of slaves and the further education of free blacks.  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Waldstreicher, ''Runaway America: Benjamin Franklin, Slavery, and the American Revolution''(2004)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Death==&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin died on April 17, 1790 at the age of 84 and was buried at Christ Church in Philadelphia.  Civic-minded to the end, Franklin's will established a 200 year trust fund for Boston and Philadelphia which was to be used to train and educate young craftsmen.  Both cities have held true to Franklin's wishes, providing aid to students and establishing the Franklin Institute of Boston.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religious Beliefs==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin progressed from a skepticism towards Puritanism as a youth to a strong belief in God and prayers for His intervention.  At all times Franklin believed in God, but was unable to define what God meant for his soul; he never joined a church. Like most in Pennsylvania, he respected freedom of religion by others, but also emphasized the importance of religion in maintaining a society; much of his writing was designed to promote moral behavior. [[Liberals]] often like to bring up that  he stated  &amp;quot;lighthouses are more helpful than churches&amp;quot;, as if that is some kind of &amp;quot;proof&amp;quot; that Franklin was only a Deist. It is merely [[liberal deceit]]. The British political system at the time of the American rebellion was based very firmly on Anglican Protestantism. Laws stated very clearly the monarch had to be a protestant, and also that they were the head of The Church of England; even Protestants who were not Anglican had to pay for their own priests and build their own churches. Catholics were still denied the vote. To gather enough support among the colonists to successfully achieve independence, their leaders had to offer them something different, and to belittle the Anglican church in particular, so as to undermine the foundation of the British political system that ruled the American colonies. So, Franklin was saying that functional, useful things (such as lighthouses) contributed more to the safety and well-being of the individual than buildings that provided spiritual things (such as churches). It was his clever means of motivation, not some far-reaching personal belief of his.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Young Ben was an avid reader. &amp;quot;From a child I was fond of reading, and all the little money that came into my hands was ever laid out in books. Pleased with the ''[[Pilgrim's Progress]],'' my first collection was of [[John Bunyan]]'s works in separate little volumes.  My old favorite author, Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress ... has been translated into most of the languages of Europe, and suppose it has been more generally read than any other book, except perhaps the Bible.&amp;quot;'' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1728, the twenty-two-year-old printer wrote &amp;quot;Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion,&amp;quot; which Walters (1999) argues is the most crucial text of all Franklin’s religious writings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; for the text see [http://www.beliefnet.com/resourcelib/docs/65/Articles_of_Belief_and_Acts_of_Religion_1p.html &amp;quot;Articles of Belief and Acts of Religion&amp;quot; by Benjamin Franklin, November 20, 1728]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Franklin embraced a concept that sanctioned the value of different religions. Walters argues this “theistic perspectivism” is the key to understanding Franklin’s religion, for it allowed him to maintain his most basic belief in a divinity as the &amp;quot;First Cause&amp;quot; while also allowing him to understand different religions and sects as different ways to honor and serve the primary creator. Franklin’s lifelong advocacy of religious tolerance and his refusal to dogmatize resulted from his understanding that all religions helped bring the &amp;quot;First Cause&amp;quot; closer to humanity, bridging the immense gulf between Creator and creation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Kerry S. Walters, ''Benjamin Franklin and His Gods,'' (1999)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin left behind the [[deism]] of his youth.  In a draft autobiography written mostly in 1771, nearly 20 years prior to his death, Franklin described how he came to deism as a teenager. He recalled that his ''&amp;quot;parents had early given me religious impressions, and brought me through my childhood piously in the Dissenting way. But I was scarce fifteen, when, after doubting by turns of several points, as I found them disputed in the different books I read, I began to doubt of Revelation itself. Some books against Deism fell into my hands; they were said to be the substance of sermons preached at Boyle's Lectures. It happened that they wrought an effect on me quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a thorough Deist.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/toccer-new2?id=Fra2Aut.sgm&amp;amp;images=images/modeng&amp;amp;data=/texts/english/modeng/parsed&amp;amp;tag=public&amp;amp;part=all The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, p.57&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin then abandoned his youthful deism in favor of a strong belief in an interventionist God, as reflected by his prayer request during a troubled period of the [[Constitutional Convention]].  In a letter dated March 9, 1790, the last letter Franklin ever wrote, he expressed his strong faith in God and the possibility of heaven: &lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;Here is my Creed: I believe in one God, Creator of the Universe. That he governs it by Providence. That he ought to be worshipped. That the most acceptable Service we render to him is doing good to his other Children. That the soul of Man is immortal, and will be treated with Justice in another Life respecting its conduct in in this. These I take to be the fundamental Principles of all sound Religion, and I regard them as you do in whatever sect I meet with them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:''&amp;quot;As to Jesus of Nazareth, my Opinion of whom you particularly desire, I think the system of Morals and His Religion, as he left them to us, the best the world ever saw, or is likely to see; but I apprehend it has received various corrupting Changes, and I have, with most of the present Dissenters in England, some doubt as to his Divinity; tho' it is a question I need not dogmatize upon, having never studied it, and think it needless to busy myself with it now, when I expect soon an Opportunity of knowing the Truth with less Trouble. I see no harm in its being believed, if that belief has the good Consequence, as probably it has, of making his Doctrines more respected and better observed; especially as I do not perceive, that the Supreme takes it amiss, by distinguishing the Unbelievers in his Government of the world with any peculiar Marks of his Displeasure.&amp;quot;'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://personal.pitnet.net/primarysources/franklin-stiles.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Whitefield===&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin admired [[George Whitefield]], who first visited the colonies in 1738 and played a major role in the [[First Great Awakening]].  Franklin saw Whitefield as a fellow intellectual, but thought Whitefield's plan to run an orphanage in Georgia would lose money. Franklin published several of Whitefield's tract. He was intrigued and himself moved by Whitefield's ability to preach and speak with clarity and enthusiasm to crowds ranging in the thousands. Franklin was an ecumenist and approved of Whitefield's ability to appeal to members of many denominations.  Franklin was not moved by the Methodist evangelist's revivals, but did conclude that religiosity was a good thing for other people, so at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, he proposed a prayer for divine intervention to aid the troubled proceedings. After one of Whitefield's sermons, Franklin noted the:&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;wonderful...change soon made in the manners of our inhabitants. From being thoughtless or indifferent about religion, it seem'd as if all the world were growing religious, so that one could not walk thro' the town in an evening without hearing psalms sung in different families of every street.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin,'' p.104-108;  Samuel J. Rogal, &amp;quot;Toward a Mere Civil Friendship: Benjamin Franklin and George Whitefield.&amp;quot; ''Methodist History'' 1997 35(4): 233-243. 0026-1238 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lifelong close friendship developed between the revivalist preacher and the worldly, secular humanist. Looking beyond their public images, one finds a common charity, humility, and ethical sense embedded in the character of each man. True loyalty based on genuine affection coupled with a high value placed on friendship helped their association grow even stronger over time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Fame== 	&lt;br /&gt;
By 1776 Franklin was the most famous American in the world. He was one of the most prominent of the Founding Fathers, early political figures and statesmen of the [[United States]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the years immediately following his death, Franklin's reputation fell upon evil days. His political enemies, as well as [[Federalist Party]], journalists systematically emphasized the less attractive aspects of his character and minimized his achievements.  The calumny was repeated until the 1850s, when the first real attempts were made to paint a broader portrait of this many-sided man. Franklin's &amp;quot;rags to riches&amp;quot; career had a natural attraction in the go-getter mood of the [[Gilded Age]] and he became the patron saint of &amp;quot;getting on,&amp;quot; a role that he has not yet lost. The xenophobia of the period also affected the image of Franklin in that his prudential philosophy appeared less an expression of selfishness than a means of achievement expressive of the best in the American national character. The late 19th century also saw the beginning of real Franklin scholarship.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Richard D. Miles, &amp;quot;The American Image of Benjamin Franklin&amp;quot; ''American Quarterly'' 1957 9(2): 117-143. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/2710628 in JSTOR]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin is one of the few non-presidents whose likeness appears on U.S. currency. Franklin graces the $100 bill while [[Alexander Hamilton]] appears on the $10 bill.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1933, Isamu Noguchi (1904-88) designed a  monument to Franklin. For years,  the project languished. It finally came to fruition in  Philadelphia in 1984 as “Bolt of Lightning . . .  Memorial to Ben Franklin.” &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was highly regarded throughout Europe as a leader in science and diplomacy, and as the representative American and the symbol of the New World's integrity and progress. The intellectual, poltiical and scoial leaders of France viewed Franklin as the epitome of the enlightened legislator, a brilliant inventor, and perceptive economist. He inspired his contemporaries and successive generations of Frenchmen to eulogize him in the arts. His unassailable reputation also encouraged divergent political factions to claim Franklin as a mentor after his death in 1790. Franklin was a figure of the Enlightenment, two countries, and two revolutions and there are still reminders of him in France today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; J. A. Leith, &amp;quot;Le Culte de Franklin en France avant et pendant la Révolution Française,&amp;quot; [&amp;quot;France's Cult of Franklin before and during the French Revolution&amp;quot;]. ''Annales Historiques de la Révolution Française,'' 1976 226 48(4): 543-571. 0003-4436 &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While most historians have admired Franklin's achievements, British literary critic [[D. H. Lawrence]] ridiculed Franklin as excessivelyt middle class. Lawrence spent time in the United States in the 1920s but came to dislike the country. He focused on Franklin as a personification of American culture in two essays. Lawrence's disdain for Franklin was based largely in their different philosophies. Franklin felt man was perfectable, and could excel through hard work, while Lawrence saw man as an imperfect, creative, fragmented being, for whom the body and emotions are central to achieving happiness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Ormond Seavey, &amp;quot;D. H. Lawrence and 'The First Dummy American'.&amp;quot; ''Georgia Review'' 1985 39(1): 113-128. 0016-8386; D. H. Lawrence, ''Studies in Classic American Literature'' (1923),   [http://xroads.virginia.edu/~hyper/LAWRENCE/dhlch02.htm online edition of ch. 2 on Franklin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
===Join or Die===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Join-die.jpg|thumb|290px|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
The famous cartoon entitled &amp;quot;Join, or Die,&amp;quot; printed on 9 May 1754 in Franklin's ''Pennsylvania Gazette'', shows a sliced up rattlesnake that forms a map of the colonies.  It is impotent unless it joins together, as nature clearly intended.  Rattlesnakes--powerful and dangerous creatures that were not found in Britain--were often used to represent America.  Georgia, the newest colony,  is missing, as is Delaware (then part of Pennsylvania). The cartoon alludes to an old myth that a snake that had been cut into pieces would come back to life if the sections were reassembled before sunset,  Franklin based his cartoon on a 17th-century French emblem book by Nicolas Verrien which includes a snake divided into two parts with the motto: 'Se rejoindre ou mourir' ('Join or die').&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the idea behind the illustration was Franklin's, historians have not discovered who did the actual engraving. In form the illustration follows the plan of an emblem book illustration, with a motto, a symbolic picture, and an explanatory text; Franklin even referred to it in correspondence as an &amp;quot;emblem.&amp;quot;  Franklin was responsible for many visual creations, such as cartoons, designs for flags and paper money,&lt;br /&gt;
emblems and devices. He possessed an extraordinary knowledge of symbols and heraldry.  The snake image may be a composite of those found in Mark Catesby's ''The Natural History of Carolina, Florida, and the Bahama Islands'' (1731-43). The iconic image of national unity became widespread in political illustrations concerning the [[Stamp Act]] of 1765, the American Revolution, and both the Union and Confederate causes in the American Civil War.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Karen Severud Cook, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin and the Snake that would not Die,&amp;quot; ''British Library Journal'' 1996 22 (1): 88-112. 0305-5167; Mark Bryant, &amp;quot;The First American Political Cartoon,&amp;quot; ''History Today'' v. 57#12 (December 2007) pp 58+. [http://www.questia.com/read/5024806593?title=The%20First%20American%20Political%20Cartoon online edition]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Autobiography==&lt;br /&gt;
A year after Franklin's death, his unfinished draft autobiography, entitled &amp;quot;Memoires De La Vie Privee,&amp;quot; was published in Paris in March of 1791, and portions soon appeared in English.  The first complete edition appeares in 1868.  It was one of the first and greatest American autobiographies and appears in many editions.  Historians have treated the ''Autobiography'' as an allegory for the paradigm of American upward social mobility as well as representing the early economic and political success of America. Beyond this basic representativeness, it endorses the economic promise of free enterprise by using Franklin's life experience to advocate the new nation's economic potential and creditworthiness. Franklin aligns his own history with that of the fledgling United States, in effect equating his ability to successfully capitalize on credit with that of the nation. By depicting his own public credibility, Franklin was able to translate his reputation and promise of success into an endorsement of the viability of American life, intertwining self- and national promotion.  In sharp contrast to Jefferson's glorification of the yeoman farmer as the carrier of republican virtue, Franklin looked to the cosmopolitan city for the advancement of mankind, as he tells how the youth arrives in the idyllic city of Philadelphia, where adherence to principles of independence, morality, and industry bring him success.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Jennifer Jordan Baker, &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography and the Credibility of Personality.&amp;quot; ''Early American Literature'' 2000 35(3): 274-293. 0012-8163; James L. Machor, &amp;quot;The Urban Idyll of the New Republic: Moral Geography and the Mythic Hero of Franklin's Autobiography.&amp;quot; ''Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography'' 1986 110(2): 219-236.  &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Autobiography'' gave an incomplete view of Franklin. The persona that Franklin assumed here was merely another of the several public roles he adopted in his writings and political activities. He believed that personal growth could only be accomplished by surrendering to a public function, and that the public forum should be a community for discourse rather than a marketplace for personal competition and acquisition. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Quotes==&lt;br /&gt;
* From a letter in April 1787: &amp;quot;Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;it would end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall have become so corrupted as to need despotic government, being incapable of any other.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;We must hang together, or most assuredly, we will hang separately.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=7mgAwXas5xIC&amp;amp;pg=PA49&amp;amp;dq=We+must+hang+together,+or+we+will+assuredly+hang+separately.&amp;amp;ei=hqEySrf_N5jeyAThoNSCBg &lt;br /&gt;
Beyond political correctness: social transformation in the United States‎ - Page 49] by Michael S. Cummings&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Work as if you were to live a hundred years. Pray as if you were to die tomorrow.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.ushistory.org/franklin/quotable/quote29.htm The Quotable Franklin] USHistory.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;Words may show a man's wit but actions his meaning.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=A5kEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=RA2-PA601&amp;amp;dq=Words+may+show+a+man%27s+wit+but+actions+his+meaning&amp;amp;ei=Azw8SvyjM5-8zASKj7y6BQ The life of Benjamin Franklin‎ - Page 601] by Benjamin Franklin, John Bigelow&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://books.google.com/books?id=SrIEAAAAYAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA430&amp;amp;dq=I+think+the+best+way+of+doing+good+to+the+poor,+is+not+making+them+easy+in+poverty,+but+leading+or+driving+them+out+of+it.&amp;amp;ei=VfNySvOGJ6bAygTw7q2TAw Memoirs of Benjamin Franklin‎ - Page 430]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;He that is good for making excuses is seldom good for anything else&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Basic readings==&lt;br /&gt;
* Becker, Carl Lotus. &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin,&amp;quot; ''Dictionary of American Biography'' (1931) with hot links [http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/franklin.htm#becker online]&lt;br /&gt;
* Brands, Henry. ''The First American: The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin'' (2000)- excellent long scholarly biography [http://www.amazon.com/First-American-Times-Benjamin-Franklin/dp/0385495404/ref=pd_bbs_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Isaacson, Walter.  ''Benjamin Franklin: An American Life'' (2004) - good popular biography [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-American-Walter-Isaacson/dp/074325807X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ketcham, Ralph. ''Benjamin Franklin'' (1966) 228 pp[http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=34300175 online edition], by short biography by a scholar&lt;br /&gt;
* Morgan, Edmund S. ''Benjamni Franklin'' (2003) the best short introduction [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-Yale-Nota-Bene/dp/0300101627/ref=pd_bbs_10?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-10 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Doren, Carl.  ''Benjamin Franklin'' (1938), standard older biography [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-Carl-Van-Doren/dp/193154185X/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222991&amp;amp;sr=8-6 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wright, Esmond.  ''Franklin of Philadelphia'' (1986) - excellent scholarly study [http://www.amazon.com/Franklin-Philadelphia-Belknap-Esmond-Wright/dp/0674318102/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203223116&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Detailed Bibliography==&lt;br /&gt;
===Biographies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Becker, Carl Lotus. &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin,&amp;quot; ''Dictionary of American Biography'' (1931) -  vol 3, with hot links [http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/franklin.htm#becker online]&lt;br /&gt;
* Brands, Henry. ''The First American: The Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin'' (2000)- excellent long scholarly biography [http://www.amazon.com/First-American-Times-Benjamin-Franklin/dp/0385495404/ref=pd_bbs_3?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Isaacson, Walter.  ''Benjamin Franklin: An American Life'' (2004) - well written popular biography [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-American-Walter-Isaacson/dp/074325807X/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Ketcham, Ralph. ''Benjamin Franklin'' (1966) 228 pp[http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&amp;amp;d=34300175 online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Morgan, Edmund S. ''Benjamni Franklin'' (2003) the best short introduction [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-Yale-Nota-Bene/dp/0300101627/ref=pd_bbs_10?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222697&amp;amp;sr=8-10 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Van Doren, Carl.  ''Benjamin Franklin'' (1938), standard older biography [http://www.amazon.com/Benjamin-Franklin-Carl-Van-Doren/dp/193154185X/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203222991&amp;amp;sr=8-6 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wood, Gordon. ''The Americanization of Benjamin Franklin'' (2005), influential intellectual history by leading conservative historian. [http://www.amazon.com/Americanization-Benjamin-Franklin-Gordon-Wood/dp/0143035282/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1236327205&amp;amp;sr=1-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wright, Esmond.  ''Franklin of Philadelphia'' (1986) - excellent scholarly study [http://www.amazon.com/Franklin-Philadelphia-Belknap-Esmond-Wright/dp/0674318102/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1203223116&amp;amp;sr=8-2 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Specialized Scholarly Studies===&lt;br /&gt;
* Anderson, Douglas.  ''The Radical Enlightenments of Benjamin Franklin''  (1997) - fresh look at the intellectual roots of Franklin&lt;br /&gt;
* Buxbaum, M.H., ed.  ''Critical Essays on Benjamin Franklin'' (1987)&lt;br /&gt;
* Chaplin, Joyce. ''The First Scientific American: Benjamin Franklin and the Pursuit of Genius.'' (2007)&lt;br /&gt;
* Cohen, I. Bernard.  ''Benjamin Franklin's Science'' (1990) - Cohen, the leading specialist, has several books on Franklin's science&lt;br /&gt;
* Conner, Paul W.  ''Poor Richard's Politicks'' (1965) - analyzes Franklin's ideas in terms of the Enlightenment and republicanism&lt;br /&gt;
* Dull, Jonathan.  ''A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution'' (1985)&lt;br /&gt;
* Ford, Paul Leicester.  ''The Many-Sided Franklin'' (1899) [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-many-sided-franklin-by-paul-leicester-ford.jsp online edition] - collection of scholarly essays&lt;br /&gt;
* Lemay, J. A. Leo, ed.  ''Reappraising Benjamin Franklin: A Bicentennial Perspective'' (1993) -  scholarly essays&lt;br /&gt;
* Lemay, J. A. Leo. ''The Life of Benjamin Franklin'' the most detailed scholarly biography, with very little interpetation; 3 volumes appeared before the author's death in 2008&lt;br /&gt;
** ''Volume 1: Journalist, 1706-1730'' (2005) 568pp [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Benjamin-Franklin-Journalist-1706-1730/dp/0812238540/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search] &lt;br /&gt;
** ''Volume 2: Printer and Publisher, 1730-1747'' (2005) 664pp; [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Benjamin-Franklin-Publisher-1730-1747/dp/0812238559/ref=pd_bxgy_b_text_b excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
**''Volume 3: Soldier, Scientist, and Politician, 1748-1757'' (2008), 768pp [http://www.amazon.com/Life-Benjamin-Franklin-Scientist-Politician/dp/0812241215/ref=pd_bbs_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1236306986&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
* McCoy, Drew R. &amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin's Vision of a Republican Political Economy for America.&amp;quot; ''William and Mary Quarterly'' 1978 35(4): 607-628. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1923207 in JSTOR]&lt;br /&gt;
* Skemp, Sheila L. ''Benjamin and William Franklin: Father and Son, Patriot and Loyalist'' (1994)- Ben's son was a leading Loyalist&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Primary Sources===&lt;br /&gt;
* Franklin, Benjamin. ''Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin'', ed. L.W. Labaree et al. (1964) [http://www.earlyamerica.com/lives/franklin/ online edition] - there are many editions&lt;br /&gt;
* Franklin, Benjamin. ''Franklin: Writings'', ed. J.A. Leo Lemay, Library of America (1987) [http://www.amazon.com/Franklin-Writings-Library-America-Benjamin/dp/0940450291/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;s=books&amp;amp;qid=1207333906&amp;amp;sr=8-1 excerpt and text search]; [http://infomotions.com/alex/?cmd=search&amp;amp;query=creator:Franklin complete text online free]&lt;br /&gt;
*Labaree, Leonard W., et al., eds., ''The Papers of Benjamin Franklin'' 35 vols. to date (1959-2002) -  definitive edition, through 1781. This massive collection of BF's writings, and letters to him, is available in print form at large research libraries. [http://www.franklinpapers.org/franklin/index.jsp?src=g1&amp;amp;gclid=CJ6my-GEwpICFSgwiQodDQldrA the complete text, searchable, is online free from Yale] It is most useful for detailed research on very specific topics.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://franklinpapers.org/franklin/ Yale edition of complete works of Benjamin Franklin]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tufts.edu/as/wright_center/fellows/bob_morse_04/ The Electrical Writings of Benjamin Franklin] Collected by Robert A. Morse, 2004.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sln.fi.edu/franklin/family/lastwill.html Franklin's Last Will &amp;amp; Testament] Transcription.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://tigger.uic.edu/~rjensen/franklin.htm &amp;quot;Guide to Benjamin Franklin&amp;quot; by Richard Jensen January 2007] &lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.english.udel.edu/lemay/franklin/ Leo Lemay, ed. ''&amp;quot;Benjamin Franklin: A Documentary History&amp;quot;]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Franklin, Benjamin}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Inventors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Founding Fathers]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Journalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Revolution]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Scientists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:diplomacy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Republicanism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Enlightenment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:British Empire]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Charlieneal</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_New_Ordeal&amp;diff=1025167</id>
		<title>Essay: New Ordeal</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:_New_Ordeal&amp;diff=1025167"/>
		<updated>2012-12-26T23:17:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Charlieneal: /* Further reading */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:29-49.gif|right|250px|thumb|Dow Jones Industrial Averages, 1929-49.]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:115yeardowgoldratio.gif|right|200px|thumb|Dow Jones Index in constant dollars relative to the price of gold. The chart is a good reflection of living standards throughout the period.]]&lt;br /&gt;
The '''New Ordeal''' is the period of time between 1929 and 1949, when the American economy finally recovered from the [[Crash of '29]].  It encompasses the four presidential terms U.S. President [[Franklin D. Roosevelt]] had been elected to, the final term having been administered mostly by his successor, President [[Harry S. Truman]].   The New Ordeal also is sometimes referred to as the '''Great Ordeal''' or simply the '''Ordeal'''.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the twenty years of the New Ordeal, America experienced 2 deep recessions, or essentially a second depression within the [[Great Depression]], and [[World War II]], a calamity that claimed the lives of 55 million people worldwide.  Many of the nations involved in World War II resorted to &amp;quot;economic planning&amp;quot;, as Economist [[Friedrich Hayek]] referred to it, to address the so-called &amp;quot;crisis in capitalism&amp;quot; in the 1930s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1929-1949 recession had within it a recession from 1937-1943; 1933 to 1937 were recovery years stimulated by the [[New Deal]] government spending. However by 1937 the nation had nowhere near recovered to where it was in 1929. Manufacturing demand stimulated by WWII led to the 1943-1949 recovery, where finally, in 1949, the New York Stock Exchange recovered to the level it had been at 1929.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1929 the DJIA declined 90.0% over a duration 34 months. Six successive market crashes comprised this famed bear market: (1) September to November 1929 (DJIA fell 40% in this first phase). (2) April to June 1930. (3) September to December 1930. (4) March to May 1931. (5) July to January 1932. (6) March to July 1932. A new bull market then started immediately, as did a business recovery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Business had topped out mildly, a month before the first crash; a gradual mild decline continued to April 1930, then fell sharply into a depression simultaneously with the end of the 1930 stock market rally. The business decline halted in December 1930, stayed level for 6 months, then plunged again in steep economic decline that didn’t lose its downward momentum for a full year, until July 1932. Business improved intermittently thereafter but still remained at depression levels through most of the decade of the 1930s except for a short recovery in 1936–37.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1934 a fall of 24.1% in the DJIA began again over 9 months. Then the market took seven more months to get back up to where 1934 began.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economic planning==&lt;br /&gt;
:'''''Main article'': [[Economic planning]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Economicplanning.JPG|right|250px|thumb|Criticism of Economic Planning was suppressed; F. A. Hayek's ''Road to Serfdom'' was rejected for publication 3 times &amp;quot;on political grounds&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Richard Cockett, ''Thinking the Unthinkable: Think-Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution, 1931–1983'', Harper Collins, London 1995, pg. 100.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|Planning will become a function of the federal government; either that or the planning agency will supersede the government, which is why, of course, such a scheme will be assimilated to the State.|20px|20px|[[Rex Tugwell]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Principle of Planning and the Institution of Laissez Faire,'' Rexford G. Tugwell, The American Economic Review, vol. 22, no. 1, March 1932. [http://www.bartleby.com/73/147.html]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal did not promote economic recovery, rather it established a system which required a permanent crisis to support a military industrial complex. The system resembled the managed and bureaucratized, state supported system of [[Germany]] before [[World War I]]. Before this regime the United States lived in a system which depended for its economic expansion upon private investment in private enterprise. After World War II the US lived in a system which depended for its expansion and vitality upon the government. This is a system, based upon a pre-World War II European model created at the moment when it had fallen into complete disrepute and disintegration in Europe.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Fifteen__The_Roosevelt_.htm ''The Roosevelt Myth'', Book 3, Ch. 14], John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cartelization===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Enforcement of the Anti-trust Act was considered as an essential instrument to prevent [[cartel]]s and trusts in restraint of trade which had been viewed as deadly to the system of [[free enterprise]]. On the [[United States presidential election, 1932|campaign trail in 1932]] Franklin Roosevelt called loudly for its strict enforcement. Yet immediately upon Roosevelt's accession to office the Anti-trust Act was suspended in order to cartelize every industry in America on the Italian [[fascist]] corporative model. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth'', John T. Flynn, Fox and Wilkes, 1948, Book 1, Chapter 4, [http://www.rooseveltmyth.com/cgi-bin/framed/2767/book/fdrmyth_Chapter_Four__The_New_New_Deal.htm ''The New New Deal''].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[National Recovery Act]] (NRA) and the [[Agricultural Adjustment Act]] (AAA) were plans to take the whole industrial and agricultural life of the country under the wing of the government, organize it into vast farm and industrial cartels, as they were called in Germany, corporatives as they were called in Italy, and operate business and farms by economic planning schemes dictated and carried out under the supervision of government. This, at the time, was known as [[fascism]]. In those days fascism was not yet defined as [[anti-­Semitism]]. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lawrence H. White, ''[https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;amp;q=cache:LnGBDv8xPH4J:mercatus.org/sites/default/files/publication/WP1043_The%2520New%2520Deal%2520and%2520Institutionalist%2520Economies.pdf+&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;pid=bl&amp;amp;srcid=ADGEESj6MXspbrCxLA0uDSgPqtrzOPAtz0eQMVFMtRwJXLV80zRN1V5yvMHVwFY74CIW0EijdZ6IaEK0aVEVtppi1AuQpbqA0dAdK00YNLlTpeE-ME-Y-ZlJ2HVkvawKAdn7921r9V_L&amp;amp;sig=AHIEtbQ4xqYx7frizGpPV9B2XEwSQLXhGg&amp;amp;pli=1 Pre-Keynsian Economic Policy]''. August 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Roosevelt Myth'', Book 1, Chapter 7, p. 78 [http://books.google.com/books?id=CVqTXJjmtmUC&amp;amp;pg=PA78&amp;amp;dq=In+those+days+fascism+was+not+defined+as+anti-Semitism.&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ei=UUJBT9WbHoPg2QW5-KXYAQ&amp;amp;ved=0CDIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=In%20those%20days%20fascism%20was%20not%20defined%20as%20anti-Semitism.&amp;amp;f=false ''An Enemy Is Welcomed''], Flynn, 1948.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Managerial state===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
James Burnham, a former [[Trotskyite]], discovered in 1941 that the &amp;quot;workers revolution&amp;quot; which allegedly was to overthrow the capitalist &amp;quot;exploiters&amp;quot;, was in real practice  a &amp;quot;managerial revolution&amp;quot; which replaced older 19th century owners of capital with twentieth century technocrats and managers.  Burnham found that &amp;quot;workers in this mythical 'workers' state' were, the facts showed, a subject class far more heavily exploited than the workers under capitalism,&amp;quot; and that the new managers in a planned economy &amp;quot;have curbed the masses and have instituted a social structure in which they are on top, not by virtue of private property rights in the instruments of production, but through their monopoly control of a state power which has fused with the economy.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James Burnham, ''The Managerial Revolution'', Indiana University Press, Bloomingham 1966.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wealth Tax Act of 1935== &lt;br /&gt;
The [[New Deal]] was able to expropriate the upper income brackets even before [[World War II]]. In 1929, total aggregate Personal Income was estimated at $80.6 billion and the tax brackets making above $50,000 retained $5.2 billion, after income and surtax; in 1936, when total Personal Income was estimated at $64.2 billion, not quite $1.2 billion was retained by &amp;quot;the Rich&amp;quot;. Taxable income above $100,000 was wholly absorbed by the government when account is made of the inheritance tax. Economist and former Austrian Finance Minister [[Joseph Schumpeter]] described it in these terms: &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;''a tremendous transfer of wealth has actually been effected, a transfer that quantitatively is comparable with that effected by [[Lenin]]. The present distribution of disposable incomes compares well with the one actually prevailing in Russia.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schumperter continues: &amp;quot;the Russian act of April 4, 1940, concerning the income tax, reveals that incomes as low as 1.812 rubles per year were subject to it. It also reveals the existence of incomes of over 300,000 rubles which were then taxed at the rate of 50 per cent. Now, let us neglect the tax on the lowest incomes entirely and put the modal income in the 1,812–2,400 ruble group at 2,000 rubles; further, let us put the modal retained income in the highest group at no higher than 150,000 rubles (though those 300,000 rubles before tax were a lower limit). Then we discover that the higher of these modes was 75 times the lower one. Even if we put, for 1940, the American equivalent (not of course in purchasing power, but in the sense of equivalent position in the income scale) of the lower mode at as low as $1,000, we shall evidently not find much in the United States income distribution of retained incomes (even apart from the reductions specifically motivated by the requirements of war finance) to support, in the light of the Russian paradigma, the current phrases about atrocious inequalities, “concentration of power” as measured by concentration of income, and the like. The evidence presented in the well-known book by Bienstock, Schwarz and Yugov on ''Industrial Management'' in [[Russia]] tends to support this view. Many other details point in the same direction, for instance, the fact that those ranges of the professions who could formerly but cannot now afford domestic servants in the United States, do enjoy this privilege—worth a ton of electrical household gadgets—in Russia. All this still fails to take account of advantages that do not pass through income accounts. The power and social position—which is one of the main reasons for valuing a high income—of the industrial manager, especially if leader of the local unit of the [[Bolshevik]] party, is far and away above that of an American industrialist. Interesting phenomenon—this Lag of Ideas! Many well-meaning people in this country now profess horror or indignation at social inequalities which did exist fifty years ago, but no longer do. Things change, slogans remain.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Class warfare===&lt;br /&gt;
:Main article:'' [[Class warfare]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Robert H. Jackson]], Assistant Attorney General, and Secretary of the Interior [[Harold Ickes]] in December 1937 made speeches inspired by the President on the [[conspiratorial]] [[Marxist]] diatribe, ''America's 60 Families.'' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''New Deal Chorus'', Time magazine, [http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,758849-1,00.html pg. 1][http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,758849-2,00.html pg. 2], Jan. 17, 1938.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In February 1944 Congress rejected Roosevelt's demand for a $10,500,000,000 tax increase and cut it to $2,300,000,000. Roosevelt vetoed it saying this was a &amp;quot;bill not for relief of the needy but of the greedy.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Senator [[Alben Barkley]], Democratic leader, rose on the floor of the Senate to say the veto was &amp;quot;a calculated and deliberate assault upon the legislative integrity of every member of Congress.&amp;quot; The entire Senate united in a roar of applause. Barkley declared that after seven years of carrying the [[New Deal]] banner for Roosevelt, he would resign his post as Democratic majority leader and he called on every member of the Congress to preserve its self respect and override the veto. The Senate overrode it 72 to 14 and the House 299 to 95.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Crash of 1937==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1937 DJIA declined 51.8% over 56 months. There were five crash phases: (1) August to November (DJIA fell 40% in this first phase). (2) February to March 1938. (3) January to April 1939. (4) May 1940. (5) October 1941 to April 1942. Business peaked out and fell violently, simultaneously with stocks. Economic indicators bottomed out 9 months later (May 1938). The recovery began mildly at first, but not until the World War II production boom was the country lifted out of the Great Depression. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period 1941–42 contained the longest nonstop downswing crash (7 1/2 months) in history. Certain analysts call this two separate bear markets, one from September 1937 to March 1938, and the second from May 1940 to April 1942. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the Great Bear Market from 1929 to 1942, the [[Dow Jones Industrial Average]] (DJIA) had rallies of 48% (from November 13, 1929, to April 17, 1930), 94% (July 8, 1932, to September 7 of that year), 121% (February 27, 1933, to February 5, 1934), 127% (July 26, 1934, to March 10, 1937), 60% (March 31, 1938, to November 12 of that year), and 28% (April 8, 1939, to September 12 of that year). Yet, on April 28, 1942, the apex of the [[Malthusian crisis]] that was [[World War II]], the DJIA was still at only 92.92, 76% below its September 3, 1929, high of 381.17. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Daniel Turov, [http://www.leithner.com.au/newsletter/issue18.htm   ''Mixed Message,''] Barron’s, 21 May 2001, quoted in the Liethner Letter, Issue 1826 June 2001, retrieved 11 June 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Double-dip recession===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When FDR was inaugurated for his second term in March 1937 [[national income]], [[payroll]]s, and industrial production&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;League of Nations Monthly Bulletin of Statistics, June, 1936. Percentage change 1929 to March 1936, United States -21.8%, rank number 13.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; were still 20 per cent below the 1929 figure and construction was still only about one third what it had been in 1929 when the nation had a booming economy due to massive speculation that would ultimately lead to the stock market crash. By June, 1937 the [[U.S. Treasury]] reported relief payments were less than in the same period the preceding 12 months, however this was not so. The Treasury merely shifted relief payments to other accounts. Relief payments were, in fact, larger than the year before. The Treasury made a practice of &amp;quot;cooking the books&amp;quot; to produce phony numbers. Stock prices declined and by September the dire reality could be no longer hidden. By the end of October 1937 the market crashed. The U.S budget was running a [[deficit]] at the time of $300,000,000 a month.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Unemployment worse than in 1933===&lt;br /&gt;
In January 1938, John D. Biggers in a study commissioned by President Roosevelt reported there were 10,870,000 people out of work, more than when FDR first took office in 1933. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,758790,00.html ''Two Schemes''], Time magazine, Jan. 10, 1938.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Roosevelt realized that all the “pump priming” and spending $17 billion had failed. Despite the billions added to the debt, the Depression was back and Roosevelt was at the center of a tug-of-war with advocates of spending like [[Harry Hopkins]], [[Leon Henderson]] and [[Rex Tugwell]] on one side, and opponents like [[Henry Morgenthau]] on the other. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DNC Chairman [[Jim Farley]] recalled on a meeting with Roosevelt on March 28, 1938. FDR told Farley he would have &amp;quot;to go in for pump priming or relief,&amp;quot; but complained he could not spend on local projects because the states and cities did not want any more buildings and institutions which they would have to pay for in perpetuity. States and localities were having trouble paying the bills on New Deal projects already built. Many [[WPA]] projects approved by the federal government were abandoned because the states and cities could not raise the money to support and occupy them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1938 Congressional elections Harry Hopkins oversaw spending programs with no regard for economic utility to meet the immediate political necessities of an election, but the growth of debt could not go on indefinitely. And the New Dealers problem was complicated by pressure from within the Democratic party to balance the budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New capital made available for investment amounted to $348,000,000 in 1935. This was less than 1/10th of the amount available in 1929.  By contrast, the British economy had nearly recovered to its 1929 levels by 1935, and the amount available for investment was almost twice as much as the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| style=&amp;quot;background:white; color:blue&amp;quot; border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Year&lt;br /&gt;
! United States &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Standard Statistics Co., ''New Money for Operating and Producing.''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
! Great Britain &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Midland Bank, London, ''New Issues for British Companies,'' converted from £ to $ at $4.8665.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1927&lt;br /&gt;
| $3,201,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| $710,509,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1928&lt;br /&gt;
| 3,062,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 983,033,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1929&lt;br /&gt;
| 3,668,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 759,174,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1930&lt;br /&gt;
| 3,039,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 394,186,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1931&lt;br /&gt;
| 1,006,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 155,728,000 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1932&lt;br /&gt;
| 321,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 248,191,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1933&lt;br /&gt;
| 177,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 296,856,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1934&lt;br /&gt;
| 356,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 350,388,000&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1935&lt;br /&gt;
| 348,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
| 666,710,500&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The country now reached a greater crisis than in 1933. The [[National debt]], which was $22 billion when Roosevelt took office and largely a heritage of [[World War I]], now was $37 billion. Taxes had been more than doubled by Roosevelt. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By April 1938 [[unemployment]] reached several thousand more than when Roosevelt was elected in 1932. This was now Roosevelt’s Double Dip Depression. Voices began to speak up suggesting after all Hoover may have known what he was doing, but here, nine years after the Depression began the fundamental condition of the country was no further advanced than it was at the end of Hoover's three year struggle with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Second New Deal===&lt;br /&gt;
All during the winter and spring of 1938 a group of young instructors from Harvard and Tufts were busy on a book which they called ''An Economic Program for American Democracy.'' which  appeared in October, 1938. These instructors had been moving under the guidance of Dr. Alvin H. Hansen,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Alvin H. Hansen, ''Fiscal Policy and Business Cycles'', (Norton, 1941).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The theory propounded may be briefly stated thus: The expansion of the American economy came to an end in 1929. Before that it had grown for several well-known reasons. (1) There was a rapid increase in population due to free immigration. (2) The frontier was open to entry and exploitation. (3) Technological expansion went forward upon an amazing scale. But all this came an end. Population is no longer increasing save at a small rate. The frontier is gone, having been exploited and settled. Technological advance at the old rate is no longer possible—the great era of revolutionary inventions is over. A basic change had come over the structure of the American economy.&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Flatgrowth.JPG|thumb|300px|right|Real Output and Growth remained stagnant throughout the New Deal. By 1938 Unemployment was worse than when FDR took office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis, ''Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian, Journal of Political Economy, volume 112 (2004), pages 779–816.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The theory continued: Government spending on the First [[New Deal]] had been proved to be a powerful. Too many people made the mistake of supposing that this was a temporary expedient to bring back a self-sustaining economic recovery. Government spending must be not be used as merely a pump primer, but as a permanent additional or auxiliary pump. The old pump—private industry and business—could no longer produce the national income required for a full life. The government had to set up built in stabilizers to maintain prosperity. &amp;quot;The government must assume full responsibility for maintaining national income at a sufficiently high level to assure full utilization of our human and material resource.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This must be done, they insisted, by government spending. &amp;quot;The notion that public spending can he safely resorted to as a temporary emergency device must he abandoned.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their thesis was as follows. The people do not spend all of the income they receive on consumable goods and services. Each year they save great sums. These savings are thus withdrawn from the function of spending. They must be brought back into the stream of spending some way or the system collapses. The orthodox method of accomplishing this in the past has been through private investment. People who save and who do not wish to spend their money for food or clothes or consumable goods are willing to invest it. If they invest it they put it into what are called capital goods—goods designed to produce other goods such as houses, buildings, machinery, etc. If they do this the money is used to create jobs, experts, technicians, etc., and this gets into the hands of people who will consume it. To keep the capitalist system going there must he a continuous flow of all savings into investment—into new industries and the expansion of old industries. That was considered a perfectly sound theory for many years. It was the basis of the opinion of those who appealed to President Roosevelt in 1933 to adopt a program that would encourage business expansion. Instead the president promoted anti-business rhetoric and class warfare causing uncertainty, and job creation suffered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The New Deal economists, however, as John Flynn cited, were just learning this important principle. But the Brain Trusters concluded that a continuous flow of savings into private investment was no longer possible. This is possible only when business men wish to borrow funds for new enterprises and expansion of old ones. But this would happen again, they said. Expansion on a sufficient scale in new enterprises and expanding old ones is hopeless because the economy has reached the end of its expansion era, as described above. The only way to avoid the inevitable collapse of the system, they proposed, was for the government to step in and borrow those sums which business refused to borrow and to spend the money on all sorts of welfare, educational, social and other public enterprises.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Government spending had already plunged the nation into debt to the tune of nearly $40 billion. Continuous spending of funds borrowed by the government would mean a continuous expansion of the government debt. Government debt, they argued, is not like private debt. It does not have to be paid. The government can keep it afloat indefinitely by redeeming old bonds with new bonds. Moreover the interest on the government debt will not be a burden. &amp;quot;The debt is due by the people to themselves,&amp;quot; they said. The people owe the debt. The people own the bonds which represent the debt. The government taxes the people to pay the interest on the bonds. It takes the taxes out of the pockets of the people and then pays it back to them in the form of interest. It is just taking it out of one pocket and putting it in the other.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government therefore need not bother about the size of the debt. It can go on borrowing indefinitely. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this same time [[Rex Tugwell]] and [[Leon Henderson]] both admitted that the New Deal spending programs failed. But they insisted it had failed because it had been on a far too modest scale. Instead of spending three billion a year, for which Roosevelt was being condemned, Tugwell said it should have spent twelve billion a year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theory of the Permanent Crisis==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Making provision for war increased business profits.  In 1936 Roosevelt had said, &amp;quot;If we face the choice of profits or peace, the nation will answer – must answer - 'We choose peace'.  It is the duty of all of us to encourage such a body of public opinion in this country that the answer will be clear.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Getting Us into War'', Porter Sargent Publisher: P. Sargent, Boston, 1941. [http://americandeception.com/index.php?action=downloadpdf&amp;amp;photo=/PDFsml_AD/Getting_Us_Into_War-Porter_Sargent-1941-640pgs-POL.sml.pdf&amp;amp;id=218&amp;amp;PHPSESSID=03d3557b41f249f71349e6d730cc8498 ''No More Millionaires''], pg. 372 pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://thinkmarkets.wordpress.com/2010/08/10/%E2%80%9Cnever-let-a-crisis-go-to-waste%E2%80%9D/ Never Let a Crisis Go to Waste]'', Mario Rizzo, August 10, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
By 1938 Roosevelt embarked on a massive defense appropriations buildup; the Administration would advance 30% to a defense contractor when placing an order. The National City Bank reported an increase of overall business profits in the year 1939 over 1938 of 63.6%, and in its December 1940 Bulletin showed for 284 companies &amp;quot;directly affected by war and defense program&amp;quot; a rise of 79.2%. The ''Wall Street Journal'' reported, &amp;quot;Betterment in profits was naturally more pronounced, as a rule, in those industries benefiting directly or indirectly from the European conflict.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Wall Street Journal'', May 3, 1940.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On February 28, 1934, Elliott Roosevelt, son of President Franklin Roosevelt, and [[Anthony Fokker]] each received half a million dollars for selling fifty military aircraft to the Soviet government. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,756770-2,00.html ''Son's Scheme''], Time magazine, Oct. 19, 1936,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Curtiss-Wright Aircraft, to enlarge its plant, received a loan of $92 million at 4%. [[I. F. Stone]] of ''[[The Nation]]'' magazine wrote, &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;quot;Offered as a non-recourse loan . . . the government would have no claim against the Wright company if it failed to repay the loan. All the government could do in that case would be to take the factory. Since the plant would be financed entirely by the government, the government would really be taking back its own property if the Wright company for some reason wanted to drop it. ...The ''Wall Street Journal'' reported on August 2 that while the loan was for $92,000,000, 'the cost of the proposed plant and its equipment is understood to be only $37,000,000 or $38,000,000'. When asked by the ''Journal'' correspondent about 'this apparent discrepancy', Jesse Jones said, 'We don't believe it would be in the public interest to break down that total at this time'....As this is being written, the Wright contract has yet to be signed.  The company is now asking for five-year amortization instead of eight.  Incidentally, a vice-president of this finicky company, T. P. Wright, was assigned to the Defense Commission on June 8 to help speed up production&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
The Defense Commission was the same commission that would determine and approve the terms of the loan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Getting Us into War'', Sargent, 1941, pg. 433.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''PM'' noted &amp;quot;For an $18,000,000 plant to command a $92,000,000 credit from any bank, including a federal one, may make financiers blink, but that is what has been arranged&amp;quot;. The Curtiss-Wright loan was only a little over five times the value of the plant. But Boeing Aircraft, with a plant worth $3,000,000 was awarded a loan of $32,000,000, more than ten times. And Boeing was to own it in five years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roger Ingersoll, ''PM'', August. 9, 1940.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Stagnationism==&lt;br /&gt;
:'''''Main article:'' [[Keynesian]]ism'''&lt;br /&gt;
1946 DJIA declined 24.6% over 37 months. There was only one crash phase (August–September 1946), and the bottom was hit within 4 months. But the market moved sideways for almost three years and tested the 1946 low area three times. The final time was in 1949, after which the market rose almost without interruption for the next 12 years (160 to 741 in 1961).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Record keeping &amp;amp; construction trades==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Record keeping and even economic definitions then were not what they are today. By using the Dow Jones Industrial Average (which is practically the only measurement available in real time that scans the entire period) the Dow did not get back to the level it was at in 1929 until 1949 (160 pts on the Dow).  Other economic indexes either did not  exist, or were developed later, often by guess work.  For example, the oft quotes unemployment rate of 25% which  peaked in 1932 is only guess work based upon observations in New York City.  No one knows what the real national figures were, or what it actually had been in places like Arkansas or Oklahoma. Gross output figures such as [[GDP]] did not exist either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was not until 1949 that [[living standards]] and peacetime [[employment]] returned to something like it was prior to 1929.  The New Ordeal is evident today throughout American cities where one can see a distinct gap in the building and construction trades that took place in the decades of the 1930's and 40's.  Little was built beyond quonset huts, tin structures with a semi-circular shape and a timber frame underneath.  And what was built was either extremely expensive, or built by the government usually for military purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.iea.org.uk/files/upld-publication43pdf?.pdf ''Road to Serfdom'',] Friedrich A. Hayek, Reader's Digest Condensed Version, April 1945.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://gigablast.com/get?d=78268369924 ''Other People's Money''], John T. Flynn, The New Republic, February 20, 1935.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''The New Ordeal'', Freeman Tilden, The North American Review, v. 239, February 1935, p. 131-7.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Ordeal by Planning'', John Jewkes, Macmillan, New York, 1948. [http://www.questia.com/library/book/ordeal-by-planning-by-john-jewkes.jsp]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''The New Ordeal by Planning'', John Jewkes, Macmillan and Co., Ltd., 1968.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''The Ordeal of Total War, 1939-1945'', Gordon Wright, New York, Evanston, and London, Harper &amp;amp; Row, 1968. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*''Franklin D. Roosevelt: The Ordeal'', Frank Freidel, Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1954.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|2}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:United States History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:New Deal]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Great Depression]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:economics]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Charlieneal</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>