https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Celigans Conservapedia - User contributions [en] 2026-10-01T07:36:45Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.14 https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&diff=860911 Talk:Intelligent design 2011-04-10T07:03:20Z <p>Celigans: /* [http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy */</p> <hr /> <div>{{Wikiproject Religion}}<br /> {{protect|TK}}<br /> [[Talk:Intelligent design/Archive-1]]<br /> <br /> == More evidence of intelligent design ==<br /> <br /> I would add [http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/01/28/meet-tiny-hour-clock-blood-cells/#content this article] giving more evidence of an intelligent designer at work. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 11:05, 30 January 2011 (EST)<br /> <br /> == [http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy ==<br /> <br /> The reference is an argument from ignorance. It effectively posits that since there is no evidence against intelligent design, it must be true. [[User:Celigans|Celigans]] 03:03, 10 April 2011 (EDT)</div> Celigans https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&diff=860910 Talk:Intelligent design 2011-04-10T07:02:46Z <p>Celigans: /* [http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy */</p> <hr /> <div>{{Wikiproject Religion}}<br /> {{protect|TK}}<br /> [[Talk:Intelligent design/Archive-1]]<br /> <br /> == More evidence of intelligent design ==<br /> <br /> I would add [http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/01/28/meet-tiny-hour-clock-blood-cells/#content this article] giving more evidence of an intelligent designer at work. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 11:05, 30 January 2011 (EST)<br /> <br /> == [http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy ==<br /> <br /> The reference is an argument from ignorance. It effectively posits that since there is no evidence against intelligent design, it must be true. ~</div> Celigans https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&diff=860909 Talk:Intelligent design 2011-04-10T06:57:36Z <p>Celigans: /* [http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy */</p> <hr /> <div>{{Wikiproject Religion}}<br /> {{protect|TK}}<br /> [[Talk:Intelligent design/Archive-1]]<br /> <br /> == More evidence of intelligent design ==<br /> <br /> I would add [http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/01/28/meet-tiny-hour-clock-blood-cells/#content this article] giving more evidence of an intelligent designer at work. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 11:05, 30 January 2011 (EST)<br /> <br /> == [http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy ==<br /> <br /> The reference is an argument from ignorance. It effectively posits that since there is no evidence against intelligent design, it must be true. [[User:Celigans|Celigans]]</div> Celigans https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Intelligent_design&diff=860908 Talk:Intelligent design 2011-04-10T06:57:16Z <p>Celigans: </p> <hr /> <div>{{Wikiproject Religion}}<br /> {{protect|TK}}<br /> [[Talk:Intelligent design/Archive-1]]<br /> <br /> == More evidence of intelligent design ==<br /> <br /> I would add [http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/01/28/meet-tiny-hour-clock-blood-cells/#content this article] giving more evidence of an intelligent designer at work. [[User:Martyp|Martyp]] 11:05, 30 January 2011 (EST)<br /> <br /> == [http://www.conservapedia.com/Intelligent_design#cite_note-0] is a logical fallacy ==<br /> <br /> The reference is an argument from ignorance. It effectively posits that since there is no evidence against intelligent design, it must be true.</div> Celigans