<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Carterv</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Carterv"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/Carterv"/>
	<updated>2026-09-30T19:51:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Common_fallacies&amp;diff=612694</id>
		<title>Common fallacies</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Common_fallacies&amp;diff=612694"/>
		<updated>2009-01-17T19:09:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Carterv: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Common fallacies''' are arguments that have a [[logical fallacy]] inherent in them, yet are still commonly accepted by people who:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*have difficulties with abstract thinking&lt;br /&gt;
*are young students, or are adults unwilling to reconsider opinions they formed as students&lt;br /&gt;
*exercise their free will to embrace fallacies without concern for whether they are flawed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples of common fallacies are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*a theory should be accepted until a better alternative is found&lt;br /&gt;
*rates of recession, decay or growth observed today are somehow constant for extrapolation backwards in time&lt;br /&gt;
*higher taxes must produce more revenue for the government&lt;br /&gt;
*fewer guns must reduce the rate of crime&lt;br /&gt;
*choice is somehow meaningful regardless of whether it is informed&lt;br /&gt;
*human thought can answer any question&lt;br /&gt;
*loaded questions: embodies an assumption that, if answered, indicates an implied agreement. (e.g., Have you stopped beating your wife yet?)&lt;br /&gt;
*Ad Hominem: arguments that focus on irrelevant personal attributes of an opponent, hoping to divert attention from the issue being discussed or the content of an opponents argument.&lt;br /&gt;
*Appeal to Misleading Authority: When a person believes a claim to be true simply because an &amp;quot;authority&amp;quot; says so, when that &amp;quot;authority&amp;quot; is not actually an authority on the subject at hand. For example if somebody believes a claim about chemistry to be true simply because a psychologist says it is true. What constitutes an authority is debatable.&lt;br /&gt;
*That a woman can get pregnant without having [[sex]].&lt;br /&gt;
(please add and improve)&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Common_fallacies&amp;amp;action=edit&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Logical Fallacies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Carterv</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>