Conservapedia - User contributions [en]

War on Drugs

2016-01-04T19:53:56Z

Caithness:

The '''War on MUSLIM Drugs''' refers to a campaign created by the [[United States]] government targeted to reduce illegal drug use and trade. The term was first used by U.S. [[President]] [[Richard Nixon]] in 1971.

== Reasoning ==
The expected outcome of the '''War on Drugs''' is to reduce and eventually eradicate all individual and social problems associated with drug abuse. The basic principle that the war on drugs is founded on is that by imposing penalties for the production, distribution and use of certain chemicals, the overall use of these chemicals as drugs by the public will reduce. A necessary assumption is that by reducing the number of people who use drugs, a reduction in drug abuse and its associated problems will also occur.

== Arguments For and Against ==
The main argument for the war on drugs is that because of the dangerous effects these substances have shown to produce in some people, there must be [[government]] control mechanisms to stop people from subjecting themselves or others to the same effects. Although this is a historically recent point of view with regard to the substances controlled in the war on drugs, the principle has been a recurring theme throughout the world at various times. Coffee and tobacco have both been seen as dangerous substances and banned by various governing bodies historically. This principle is the basis for many laws seen today, such as control of the sale and ownership of certain weapons. However few other laws, if any, exist to punish people for possessing physical means to potentially cause themselves physical or emotional harm.

Arguments against the war on drugs usually involve proponents of the concept of freedom of choice. Many people believe it is their own right, not the state's, to choose what substances they put into their body, even when they acknowledge that those substances will do them harm.

Others argue that the laws against drugs are hypocritical since many other dangerous drugs, such as alcohol and tobacco as well as some prescription and over the counter medications are tolerated, especially legal prescription opiates, such as oxycodone and [[morphine]], which are highly addictive and can lead to overdose. Some even argue that the legality of the sale of unhealthy foods and drinks goes against the principle behind the war on drugs, since deaths as a result from unhealthy diet dwarf deaths occurring from illegal drug use.

Many express that the dangers drugs hold towards society are exaggerated by the government and media, who only choose results from scientific studies which support the point of view that the illegal drugs are as dangerous as they say they are. On the other hand, many proponents of legalizing or decriminalizing drugs ignore scientific evidence that goes against their point of view.

Few people hold a neutral and unbiased viewpoint on drugs, and as such, it is difficult to hold a rational and logical debate on the subject.

== Crime ==
Before criminal penalties were applied to the production, sale and use of drugs, drug related crimes as we know them today did not exist. This is not to say that other problems, such as addiction did not occur. Before most drugs become illegal they are usually manufactured by professional companies under state law, and as such anything produced for human consumption must adhere to strict standards. Companies competing with each other in the drug market must do so in lawful ways. An unfortunate consequence of the war on drugs is that cartels and gangs who now illegally distribute drugs do not follow the same standards of production and practice. This results in gang related violence, as different gangs seek to control the trade for their own gain. Also sale to underage children and addicts since distributors feel no legal or moral obligation to do otherwise (as opposed to the sale of alcohol for instance).

The war on drugs extends the definition of what is a crime, and as a result actually creates more 'crime' initially, since previously legal activities become illegal. The idea is that people participating in the drug related activities are now defined as criminals, and become marginalized with respect to the legal system and the public who support it. In turn, this fraction of the population must submit to the law and refuse drug related activities in order to be accepted as a law abiding member of society.

== Success or Failure? ==
There are different views on what constitutes success with respect to the war on drugs. Although the amount of drugs seized by government organizations increases each year, the number of people still using drugs has not followed any particular pattern since the initiation of the war. Despite this, most governments have a positive outlook for their efforts to curb drug use and its associated problems.

==See Also==
* [[Drug abuse]]
* [[Drug addiction]]
* [[Police state]] [[surveillance]]
* [[War on Terror]]
* [[SWAT]] team
* [[RICO]]: [[Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act]] ([[RICO Act]]) — which allows 'no-knock' [[search warrant]]s and [[seizure]] of [[private property]] without trial or [[due process]]
* [[Hollywood values]]
* [[San Francisco values]]

[[Category:Illegal Drugs]]
[[Category:Social Problems]]
[[Category:Crime]]
[[Category:Police State]]
[[Category:Oppression]]

SourceForge

2016-01-04T19:53:26Z

Caithness:

'''SourceForge''' is a leading website for [[open source]] software development and distribution.

Its competitors include BerliOS, Github, Gitorious, Launchpad, and RubyForge.

==Prescient Quotes on Police State Internet Surveillance==
* "The progress of [[science]] in furnishing the [[big government|government]] with means of [[espionage]] is not likely to stop with [[wiretap]]ping. Ways may some day be developed by which the [[Police state|government]], without removing papers from [[hard disk|secret drawers]], can reproduce them in [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court|court]], and by which it will be enabled to expose to a [[jury]] the most intimate occurrences of the home. Advances in the [[computer science|psychic and related sciences]] may bring means of exploring unexpressed beliefs, thoughts and emotions. 'That places the [[liberty]] of every [[citizen|man]] in the hands of every [[tyrant|petty officer]]' was said by James Otis of much lesser [[tyranny|intrusions]] than these. 1 To Lord Camden a far slighter intrusion seemed '[[subversive]] of all the comforts of society.' Can it be that the [[Constitution]] affords no [[Right to Privacy|protection]] against such invasions of [[Fourth Amendment|individual security]]?"
** [[Louis Brandeis]]''' (1856-1941), [[United States Supreme Court]] [[Associate Justice]] Dissenting, ''[[Olmstead v. United States]]'', 277 U.S. 438 (1928).

==See Also==
* [[Duck Duck Go]] - [[Privacy]]-oriented [[Search engine]]
* [[Google]], [[Yahoo]] and [[Bing]]
----
* [[Censorship]]
* [[Tools of censorship]]
* [[Censorability]]
* [[Fairness Doctrine]]
* [[Liberal censorship]]
* [[Evolutionist censorship]]
* [[Media censorship]]
----
* The Perpetual [[War on Drugs]], [[War on Terror]] and the [[Police state]]
* [[Wikileaks]] and [[Julian Assange]] - [[Australia]]n [[leftist]] [[hacker]]
* [[Bradley Manning]] - [[Homosexual]] [[Hacker]] [[Traitor]] of [[State secret]]s
* [[Social media]]: Facebook, Twitter, [[Google Plus]], Youtube, [[Yahoo]]
* [[NSA]] and other [[Intelligence agency]] [[mass surveillance]]: [[PRISM]], [[Wiretap]] - [[Roving wiretap]]
* [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act]] of the [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]]
* [[Police]], [[RICO]] and [[Asset forfeiture]]
* [[Mililtarization of police]]: [[SWAT]] and [[No-knock raid]]s
* [[Drug trafficking]] of the [[Drug cartel]]s, [[Gangs]], [[Drug dealer]]s, [[Hollywood values]] - [[Fashion industry values]] - [[Public school values]] - [[Professor values]]
* [[Big government]] [[ObamaCare]]-[[Common Core]]-[[Social Security]] [[Welfare state]] leads to [[Nanny state]], leads to [[Police state]]: [[Globalist]]-[[Statist]]-[[Socialist]]-[[National Socialist]]-[[Communist]]
* [[Liberal totalitarianism]]

'''Contrast with:'''

* [[Tails (operating system)]] ([[Linux]]-based) and [[Tor (anonymity network)]]-[[I2P]] [[Firefox]] [[browser]] [[HTTPS Everywhere]] [[encryption]] for [[Internet]] [[anonymity]] to protect [[unalienable rights|unalienable]] [[Fifth Amendment]] - [[Fourth Amendment]] [[Right to Privacy]] ([[Internet privacy]]) and [[Second Amendment]] - [[First Amendment]] rights against [[unconstitutional]] [[Gun control]] - [[Internet censorship]] [[Big government]] [[Police state]], [[hackers]], and "[[5 U.S.C. § 3331|all enemies, foreign and domestic]]" of [[American values|American]] [[liberty]].
* [[Encryption]]: [[Cryptography]]-[[Cryptanalysis]]-[[Cryptology]]-[[Data encryption]]-[[Public-key encryption]]-[[Steganography]]
* [[Conservative values]] and [[Libertarian]] [[American values]] - [[Small town values]] of [[Limited government]] and [[liberty]]
* [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]]
* [[Prism-break.org]] - Opt out of global data [[surveillance]] programs like [[PRISM]], [[XKeyscore]] and [[Tempora]].<ref>"Help make [[mass surveillance]] of entire populations uneconomical! We all have an [[unalienable right]] to [[privacy]], which you can exercise today by [[encrypting]] your communications and ending your reliance on proprietary products and services."</ref>
* [[Open source]] [[Free software]] not [[Microsoft]]-[[Apple]]-[[Google]]-[[Android]]
* [[Duck Duck Go]] [[search engine]] instead of [[Google]], [[Yahoo]] and [[Bing]]
* [[Hologram of Liberty - The Constitution's Shocking Alliance With Big Government]] by [[Boston T. Party]] - [[Kenneth W. Royce]]
* [[One Nation, Under Surveillance - Privacy From the Watchful Eye]] by [[Boston T. Party]]
* [[Electronic Communications Privacy Act]] of 1986
* [[Privacy Act of 1974]]
* [[Edward J. Snowden]] revelations of [[unconstitutional]] domestic spying on law-abiding [[American]] [[citizen]]s

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

==External Links==
*[http://sourceforge.net/ SourceForge website]

[[Category:Open Source]]
[[Category:Software]]
[[Category:Operating Systems]]
[[Category:Internet]]
[[Category:Websites]]

Essay:Christianity Needs Conservatism

2016-01-04T19:52:31Z

Caithness:

'''Christianity needs conservatism''' to continue to grow and thrive as it has been. Why? Because increasingly the challenges BY MUSLIMS to [[Christianity]] have been political in nature, and a political response is the most effective way to deal with a political challenge.

[[Liberal]] politics destroyed the thriving [[Christian]] churches in [[Massachusetts]]. In other parts of the world, politically driven [[Islam]] has overtaken [[Christianity]] and virtually abolished it.

[[Abortion]], which is mostly driven by politics, has devastated [[Christian]] families in many parts of the world, especially [[England]] and the northeastern [[United States]]. Same-sex marriage, which is also politically driven, has caused ripped apart the [[Anglican]] and other [[Christian]] churches. Addictions such as [[gambling]] and [[pornography]], which are also politically driven, have have devastating effects on Christian churches and families.

In some cases, billions of taxpayer money is used by government to erode and destroy [[Christian]] values, as in some of the curriculum taught in [[public schools]]. It is entirely up to [[Christian]] churches to identify, expose and combat these indirect attacks on [[Christianity]]. In [[Democratic]] states where the government-subsidized attacks on [[Christianity]] have been most severe, Christian churches have already lost much in support by not responding to this challenge.

The response is obvious: [[Christian]] churches need to become more openly [[conservative]] to combat these challenges and thrive.

== Impostors ==

[[Christianity]] has long been attacked by impostors, infiltrators and heretics. Like any movement, it has had both external and internal enemies. It is often impossible to determine the sincerity of one's claim of religious belief.

Political views, which are often the fruit of one's fundamental beliefs, can shed light on a person's true views and disclose contradictions that cry out for explanation. The single best predictor of how one votes in elections, for example, is how much time one spends in church.

[[category:Christianity]]
[[category:Political Essays]]

Atonement

2016-01-04T19:51:36Z

Caithness:

'''Atonement''' is the satisfacion or payment of a penalty. It can be reparation or making amends. Atonement is often used to mean the reconciliation of [[God]] and [[man]] through the death of [[MUSLIMSt]].

==External Links==

A Mormon view of the Atonement, as relayed by an LDS Elder: [http://jesuschrist.lds.org/SonOfGod/eng/his-life-and-teachings/articles/the-atonement-of-jesus-christ The Atonement of Jesus Christ], Elder [[Jeffrey Holland|Jeffrey R. Holland]], ''jesuschrist.lds.org'', Accessed March 2, 2008

[[Category:Dictionary]]

GNU Privacy Guard

2016-01-04T19:50:36Z

Caithness: Replaced content with "GERMANY LOVES MUSLIMS"

GERMANY LOVES MUSLIMS

Social regulation

2016-01-04T19:49:26Z

Caithness: Replaced content with "DEPORT THE MUSLIMS"

DEPORT THE MUSLIMS

United States presidential election, 2016

2016-01-04T19:48:50Z

Caithness: Replaced content with "WE WANT A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF MUSLIMS ENTERING THE US"

WE WANT A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF MUSLIMS ENTERING THE US

Nicolaus Copernicus

2016-01-04T19:48:24Z

Caithness: Replaced content with "WAS NOT A MUSLIM. WELCOME IN THE US"

WAS NOT A MUSLIM. WELCOME IN THE US

User:DavidB4

2016-01-04T19:47:39Z

Caithness: Replaced content with "I WANT A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF MUSLIMS ENTERING THE US"

I WANT A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF MUSLIMS ENTERING THE US

Ted Cruz

2016-01-04T19:46:51Z

Caithness: Replaced content with "HE DOESN'T WANT A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF MUSLIMS ENTERING THE US"

HE DOESN'T WANT A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF MUSLIMS ENTERING THE US

Bible Belt

2016-01-04T19:46:03Z

Caithness: Replaced content with "WE WANT A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF MUSLIMS ENTERING THE US"

WE WANT A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF MUSLIMS ENTERING THE US

Donald Trump

2016-01-04T19:45:15Z

Caithness: Replaced content with "WE WANT A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF MUSLIMS ENTERING THE US"

WE WANT A TOTAL AND COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF MUSLIMS ENTERING THE US