<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=CCPSHILL</id>
	<title>Conservapedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=CCPSHILL"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Contributions/CCPSHILL"/>
	<updated>2026-10-01T05:27:42Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.14</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Imperialism&amp;diff=1710541</id>
		<title>Imperialism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Imperialism&amp;diff=1710541"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:51:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Imperialism''' is a system of economic domination involving the principal state and the subaltern state (the former dominating the latter). Imperialism may refer to the expansion of empires, which existed in the ancient, feudal, and [[Capitalist mode of production|capitalist mode of production]], or with modern imperialism whose existence is contingent on the existence of [[Capitalism|capitalism]]. It is associated with the export of capital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Why it occurs==&lt;br /&gt;
Capitalist markets, as per the forces commanding them to expand, seek new areas to develop into when their current ones are already saturated. Hence, nations begin conducting imperialism on their behalf. Usually this is accompanied by a made-up justification for the aggressive nature of such, e.g. by saying that the target nations are primitive, subhuman, or that they are a threat and need to be &amp;quot;liberated&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==On the notion of imperialism being a benefit for the subjects==&lt;br /&gt;
The point is not that imperialism doesn’t result in economic development – it clearly does – however the bulk of it is for the benefit of foreign capitalists, who restrict the growth of an indigenous capitalist class and create small islands of industry among backwardness. The economic development in the nations subject to imperialism are mere casualties, unintended consequences of a relation that could have instead benefited the local people. In many cases the imperialists also perpetuate the local power of pre-capitalist authorities like tribal chieftains to hinder the growth of modern, nationally-oriented political movements. This is why Karl Marx writes:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|All the English bourgeoisie may be forced to do will neither emancipate nor materially mend the social condition of the mass of the people, depending not only on the development of the productive powers, but on their appropriation by the people. But what they will not fail to do is to lay down the material premises for both. Has the bourgeoisie ever done more? Has it ever effected a progress without dragging individuals and people through blood and dirt, through misery and degradation?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Indians will not reap the fruits of the new elements of society scattered among them by the British bourgeoisie, till in Great Britain itself the now ruling classes shall have been supplanted by the industrial proletariat, or till the Hindoos themselves shall have grown strong enough to throw off the English yoke altogether.|from ''The Future Results of British Rule in India''|}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Decolonization and neo-colonial relations==&lt;br /&gt;
It occurred partially as a result of direct governance becoming too unwieldy, with independence movements being too strong for colonial powers after World War II, on top of inter-imperialist rivalry. The United States often promoted decolonization in order to loosen up the controls by other colonial powers in order to get a bigger share for itself, a precursor to which may be seen in the Open Door Policy that began in the late 19th century, in which the United States wanted to make control over China &amp;quot;fair&amp;quot; by keeping any one nation from having exclusive trading rights to an area; though of course the US wouldn't have done this if it had been in control of a dominant portion of China already. So it was with the former colonies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Empires didn’t break apart out of goodwill; in most cases there was fought a brutal war by the natives against the colonialists wherein the colonialists decided that the colonies were not worth it, particularly within the post-World War II context, and so decided to grant them their “independence” – on a map, those new countries are their own, however they are still deeply tied to their previous masters economically, often with a strikingly similar relationship – the poor, resource-rich country provides its master resources in exchange for money, most of which ends up in the hands of the ruling class of that country anyways, never to really be reinvested back into the nation with a proper intent of developing it. Houphouët-Boigny of Côte d'Ivoire is a particularly good example of a leader in such a role. One term that recognizes and rather formalizes these kinds of neo-colonial relationships is ''Françafrique'', which refers to France's sphere of influence in Africa. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The role of religious figures/missionaries in imperialism==&lt;br /&gt;
They are sent early on to soften up the population for exploitation. Ephesians 6:5-8, for instance, gives this instruction to conquered peoples (who would pretty much end up as slaves in some way):&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear, and with sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. Obey them not only to win favor when their eye is on your, but as slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart. Serve wholeheartedly, as if you were serving the Lord, not people, because you know that the Lord will reward each one for whatever good they do, whether they are slave or free.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The verse after this tells the masters of slaves to “not threaten them”, though it remains that slavery is normalized through religion and the slaves are taught to think of it as a good thing even. Alongside this is the focus on the afterlife, placating the conquered people into thinking that the life they live, and particularly the pain and exploitation of it, doesn't really matter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another part of the Bible which perpetuates slavery and imperialism is Romans 13:1-5:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. For the one in authority is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God’s servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Instances of imperialism instigated by companies==&lt;br /&gt;
* The 1953 coup in Iran that overthrew Mosaddegh was sponsored by the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company&lt;br /&gt;
* The 1954 coup in Guatemala was pushed for by the United Fruit Company&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Theories of Modern Imperialism==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Lenin's Theory of Imperialism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Lenin]] argues that imperialism should be understood by a number of criteria: the concentration of capital creating monopoly capital that dominates economic life; the merging of bank capital and industrial capital to form finance capital; the export of capital; and the formation of associations of monopolist capitalist countries that divide the world amongst themselves.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lenin, V. (1916). Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/ch07.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Criticism====&lt;br /&gt;
Authors Nye and Welch argue that Lenin's theory does not apply to World War I since the representatives of business and banking opposed the war efforts. This is countered by arguing that states nonetheless ventured to facilitate the interests of finance capital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===J.A. Hobson===&lt;br /&gt;
===Bukharin===&lt;br /&gt;
===Michael Hudson===&lt;br /&gt;
===David Harvey===&lt;br /&gt;
===Bill Warren===&lt;br /&gt;
===Zak Cope===&lt;br /&gt;
===Samir Amin===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Kautsky's ultra-imperialism===&lt;br /&gt;
===World-systems theory===&lt;br /&gt;
World-systems theory (also known as world-systems analysis or the world-systems perspective), a multidisciplinary, macro-scale approach to world history and social change, emphasizes the world-system (and not nation states) as the primary (but not exclusive) unit of social analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;World-system&amp;quot; refers to the inter-regional and transnational division of labor, which divides the world into core countries, semi-periphery countries, and the periphery countries. Core countries focus on higher skill, capital-intensive production, and the rest of the world focuses on low-skill, labor-intensive production and extraction of raw materials. This constantly reinforces the dominance of the core countries. Nonetheless, the system has dynamic characteristics, in part as a result of revolutions in transport technology, and individual states can gain or lose their core (semi-periphery, periphery) status over time. For a time, some countries become the world hegemon; during the last few centuries, as the world-system has extended geographically and intensified economically, this status has passed from the Netherlands, to the United Kingdom and (most recently) to the United States of America.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Endless wars==&lt;br /&gt;
Some leaders of Western countries say they want to end endless wars, however either they only do this for political clout or they will be prevented by private interests, since the West is largely and increasingly reliant on expanding to newer markets, as is the nature of capitalism. Lenin wrote about this phenomenon in his work ''Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism''. Imperialism is primarily carried out by the United States, which had assumed the de facto leadership role of such after World War II, where the United Kingdom and France were in shambles and so within the United States rose the military-industrial complex. This carries over into modern times where the United States spends much more than the other Western countries on its military, as it has become specialized in that role, with the other countries either helping out only minorly or outright piggybacking on the results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[List of atrocities committed by the United States]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Social_Democracy&amp;diff=1710540</id>
		<title>Social Democracy</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Social_Democracy&amp;diff=1710540"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:50:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Social democracy is a [[Political ideology|political ideology]] that, in its current meaning, seeks to merely modify parameters within which [[Capital|capital]] operates with the aim of humanising or taming [[Capitalism|capitalism]]. Social democracy pursues the increasing of [[Welfare|welfare]] of [[Proletariat|working people]] through social programs. However, social democracy has gone through multiple meanings, the oldest of which was revolutionary.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== First Phase: Marxism (circa 1875-1910) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this phase of social democracy it was a [[Marxism|Marxist]] movement advocating the revolutionary overthrow of private ownership in favour of social ownership. It was associated with the Second International that existed between 1889 until 1916. The majority of social-democratic parties backed their national governments when they entered into World War I, an event sometimes referred to as the Great Betrayal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;4th August 1914: The Great Betrayal and Collapse of the Second International. Accessed December 9. http://www.marxist.com/4th-august-1914-the-great-betrayal-and-collapse-of-the-second-international.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Second Phase: Revisionism (circa 1910-1945) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Revisionism is associated with Eduard Bernstein.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bernstein disavowed scientific socialism in favour of ethical socialism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Third Phase: From Consensus to Crisis (circa 1945-1970s) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After [[World War II]] a consensus developed around social-democracy and Keynesianism. Paternalistic conservative and social-democratic parties built welfare states and nationalised key industries such as telecommunications and public transportation. This period coincided with the post-World War II economic boom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In this period, the aim of social-democracy was the elimination of poverty, cradle-to-grave welfare provisions, creating full employment, and it upheld values such as class politics and the nation-state.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1970s this period ended when social-democracy and Keynesianism hit a crisis. The 1973-1977 recession [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973%E2%80%9375_recession wp] was the primary catalyst for the transition to neo-liberalism in the 1970s. This was compounded by the fact that inflation and unemployment rose simultaneously, whereas Keynesians had theoretically 'proved' that there was a negative trade off between the two phenomena.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Fourth Phase: Neo-revisionism (circa 1970s-present) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Globalisation had forced social democracy into crisis and it had to reinvent itself. This produced what is referred to as neo-revisionism and is related to neo-liberalism and the Third Way championed by Clinton, Tony Blair, and Dutch former prime minister Wim Kok.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Socialism, meaning state intervention, was declared dead and class conflict was replaced by a consensus view of society. Key is the concept of a market state, based on social investment in infrastructure and people geared toward global competitiveness.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Andrew Heywood. Political Ideologies. 3rd edition.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Thus, education warrants state investment to create a capable work force for the particular needs of capital of the information age, rather than to enable self-actualisation and cultural enrichment. Many social-democratic parties have, on this basis, supported austerity measures in the aftermath of the 2009-2014 economic crisis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Full employability has replaced the goal of full employment, and the aim of cradle-to-grave welfare provisions has been replaced by the notion of the concept of welfare-to-work. It upholds values such as meritocracy, equality of opportunity, and globalisation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Democratic Socialism (1970s-present) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Democratic socialism developed as anti-neoliberal reaction to neo-liberalised social democracy. This current is similarly committed to the aims of the third phase of social democracy, namely full employment, social welfare, nationalisation of key industries, and opposition to deregulation and liberalisation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chavismo is considered a form of democratic socialism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples of parties in Europe include the Socialist Party (Netherlands) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_(Netherlands) wp] and the Left Party (Sweden) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left_Party_(Sweden) wp].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Eurocommunism (1970s-present) ===&lt;br /&gt;
Eurocommunism is a reformist deviation from [[Marxism-Leninism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Various Marxist-Leninist parties have transformed into Eurocommunist parties, including the Communist Party of Spain, the Japanese Communist Party, and the now defunct Communist Party of the Netherlands and the Mexican Communist Party. Presently, Synaspismós (SYN), which dominates the party SYRIZA [wp], is the largest Eurocommunist party globally. SYRIZA has achieved major electoral success and was backed by famous Marxist Slavoj Zizek. It has moderated its stances since 2014.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kerin Hope. December 10, 2014 6:00 pm. Greece’s radical left Syriza seeks to soften its sharp edges. Accessed December 11. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/577efe3a-8080-11e4-9907-00144feabdc0.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Robert Stevens. 2014. Greece’s SYRIZA steps up its overtures to big business. Accessed December 11. http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/07/04/gree-j04.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The party's leader Tsipras &amp;quot;promises Greek businesses tax breaks and reforms that can bolster healthy enterprise and leave back the parasitic, state-funded business model of the past&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Gilson. 2014 May 29. Tsipras builds bridges with business. Accessed December 11. http://www.enetenglish.gr/?i=news.en.article&amp;amp;id=1980&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=German_Democratic_Republic&amp;diff=1710537</id>
		<title>German Democratic Republic</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=German_Democratic_Republic&amp;diff=1710537"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:47:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The German Democratic Republic (abbreviated '''GDR''' or '''DDR''', and unofficially known as '''East Germany''') was a [[people's republic]] in central Europe that existed from 1949 to 1990.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Infobox country&lt;br /&gt;
| englishname = German Democratic Republic&lt;br /&gt;
| nativename = Deutsche Demokratische Republik&lt;br /&gt;
| shortname = GDR&lt;br /&gt;
| mapfile = [[File:East_Germany_1956-1990.svg.png|300px|frameless|Map of the GDR]]&lt;br /&gt;
| flagfile = [[File:Flag_of_the_German_Democratic_Republic.svg.png|125x63px|frameless|Flag of the GDR]]&lt;br /&gt;
| emblemfile = [[File:State_arms_of_German_Democratic_Republic.svg.png|85x88px|frameless|Emblem of the GDR]]&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[World War II]] left Germany a shadow of its former self. Cities had been leveled, and the economy had been utterly devastated. Eastern Germany in particular was at a serious disadvantage; it had always been far less industrialized than Western Germany, and as such, it had depended largely upon the West for its economic needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Before World War II, the area that later became East Germany was not well developed industrially. Because this area lacked raw materials, heavy industry was generally located in other parts of the German state. Compounding the problems for the newly created East German state in 1949 was the massive destruction during World War II of the industrial plant that had existed there and the subsequent Soviet dismantling and removal of factories and equipment that had survived the war. [...] During the interwar years, the territory that is now East Germany was profoundly dependent on external economic ties. In the mid-1930s, it shipped almost half of its total production to the other parts of Germany. […] This domestic trade featured sales of agricultural products; textiles; products of light industry, such as cameras, typewriters, and optical equipment; and purchases of industrial goods and equipment.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thus, Eastern Germany depended totally on the West for its heavy industrial needs, and paid for these needs by selling its agricultural and light industrial products. However, this balance between East and West was thrown off after the war:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Major dislocations occurred after World War II, when Germany was divided into two sections, one part dominated by the Soviet Union, and the other by the Western Allies. Because it could no longer rely on its former system of internal and external trading, the Soviet Zone of Occupation had to be restructured and made more self-sufficient through the construction of basic industry.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This was challenging for the young GDR, especially seeing as it received virtually no large-scale economic aid from the USSR (which was too busy reconstructing itself after WWII to worry about funding the GDR). In addition, the GDR had to pay heavy reparations to the USSR for the damage caused during WWII. This acted as a major obstacle to development. According to ''The East German Economy, 1945–2010'', published by the German Historical Institute, direct and indirect reparations paid by East Germany between 1946 and 1953 amounted to $14 billion in 1938 prices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The reorientation and restructuring of the East German economy would have been difficult in any case. The substantial reparations costs that the Soviet Union imposed on its occupied zone, and later on East Germany, made the process even more difficult. Payments continued into the early 1950s, ending only with the death of Stalin. According to Western estimates, these payments amounted to about 25 percent of total East German production through 1953.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is in direct contrast to the West, which received large aid investments from the United States as part of the Marshall Plan, as well as lucrative trade relationships with the developed nations. After the war on the second of August, 1945 the allies presented the Postdam agreement which described the demilitarization of Germany, repayments that Germany needed to pay and the control of allied powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nato.int/ebookshop/video/declassified/doc_files/Potsdam%20Agreement.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; While the agreement was supposed to cause allies to control Germany jointly their differing economic and political goals made it impossible. By the start of 1950s, two German states existed: the market capitalist Federal Republic of Germany (FRG), and the socialist planned German Democratic Republic (GDR). The war losses USSR had during the war amounted to 1,700 cities and urban areas, 70,000 villages, 32,000 enterprises and 65 kilometers of railway, thousands of schools and hospitals and about 20 million people lost their home. The 30% of national wealth was lost. The numbers were released by Izvestia, a government run newspaper and were thought of by Western powers as made up for propaganda purposes. The numbers released after the fall of USSR show that was not the case.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; Figures from Dimitri Wolkogonow, Stalin. Triumpf und Tragödie. Ein politisches Porträt (Düsseldorf, 1993), 681–2; Rainer Karlsch and Jochen Laufer, eds., Sowjetische Demontagen in Deutschland 1944– 1949 (Berlin, 2002), 31–2; Uhl, Teilung, 7–9. On the validity of the figures, see the more recent publications Jochen Laufer, Pax Sovietica. Stalin, die Westmächte und die deutsche Frage 1941–1945 (Cologne, 2009), 263; Bogdan Musial, Stalins Beutezug. Die Plünderung Deutschlands und der Aufstieg der Sowjetunion zur Weltmacht (Berlin, 2010), 249, 452.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Soviet zone was divided economically into two parts, the north which was predominantly agricultural, and the south which was heavily industrialized, being the Third Reich industrial core. The south focused on metal working, electrical, chemical and machine tools. Despite that the Soviet zone had problems with lack of raw materials like copper. Iron and hard coal. At the other hand the quantity of brown coal, potash, gravel and uranium which was to become important in Soviet nuclear industry were plentiful, with the GDR becoming the third largest uranium producer in the world. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rainer Karlsch, Uran für Moskau. Die Wismut – Eine populäre Geschichte (Berlin, 2007), 231–7; Matthias Judt, ed., DDR-Geschichte in Dokumenten (Berlin, 1997), 89–91; Karlsch, Allein bezahlt, 35; Steiner, Plan zu Plan, 19–24.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Overall the German industry did not suffer great losses in the war with 15% lost in industrial capacity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wolfgang Zank, Wirtschaft und Arbeit in Ostdeutschland&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1989, the [[PRC]] offered to save the GDR from collapse:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Comrade Egon Krenz&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Today I held extensive talks with comrade Lin Hanxiong, minister of urban planning (who first visited the GDR in 1982 to revitalise relations). Comrade Lin Hanxiong stated that the fate of socialism in the GDR is of utmost strategic importance for world socialism and for the victory of socialism in the PRC. The CPC leadership is ready to do whatever is necessary to support the survival of socialism in the GDR. In light of complicated labour shortages in the GDR, the PRC is willing to offer any required amount of skilled labour in any necessary qualification.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The PRC does not expect any payment in foreign exchange, because they consider it political assistance. Balance settlement could be done by goods.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Comrade Lin Hanxiong announced his willingness to travel to Berlin on short notice to engage in direct talks with the responsible state organs. The PRC is ready for very short term decisions. Comrade Lin Hanxiong stressed that ideally a reply by the GDR should arrive before the 5th congress of the CC CPC at the beginning of November.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
​Request answer.&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
​berthold&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
27.10. 14.00|Peking|https://img.welt.de/img/geschichte/mobile202839650/5722502937-ci102l-w1024/Printfoto1.jpg}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Aftermath ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most people in the West imagine the fall of the GDR as a time of widespread euphoria and freedom; however, for millions of people in the GDR this was far from the case. One account of this time was written for the ''Guardian'' by Bruni de la Motte, an East German woman who has since become a British trade union negotiator. She reports that widespread unemployment and misery occurred after the [[short twentieth century]]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Little is known here [the West] about what happened to the GDR economy when the wall fell. Once the border was open the government decided to set up a trusteeship to ensure that “publicly owned enterprises” (the majority of businesses) would be transferred to the citizens who’d created the wealth. However, a few months before unification, the then newly elected conservative government handed over the trusteeship to west German appointees, many representing big business interests. The idea of “publicly owned” assets being transferred to citizens was quietly dropped. Instead all assets were privatized at breakneck speed. More then 85% were bought by West Germans and many were closed soon after. In the countryside 1.7 million hectares of agricultural and forest land were sold off and 80% of agricultural workers lost their job.|Bruni de la Motte|[https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/nov/08/1989-berlin-wall]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another article from the ''Guardian'' reports on the long-term impact this has had on the economy in Eastern Germany, noting that there has been virtually no advancement in the East-to-West productivity ratio since 1991:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Productivity in the former east was 70% of that in the west in 1991 and rose to just 73% in 2012, in part a legacy of the number of factories that were bought by West German industrialists and deliberately run into the ground to scotch competition. […] Experts say the fact that most of the large industry and production bases are in the west and that those in the east are far smaller — with most employers in agriculture or service industries like meat-processing and call centres — will have a long-term effect of increasingly holding back the economy in the east and ensuring that the wage discrepancy remains and likely worsens.|Kate Connolly|[https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/02/german-reunification-25-years-on-how-different-are-east-and-west-really]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A mass-purging of academia and professional life likewise took place after the short twentieth century:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Large numbers of ordinary workers lost their jobs, but so too did thousands of research workers and academics. As a result of the purging of academia, research and scientific establishments in a process of political vetting, more than a million individuals with degrees lost their jobs. This constituted about 50% of that group, creating in East Germany the highest percentage of professional unemployment in the world; all university chancellors and directors of state enterprises as well as 75,000 teachers lost their jobs and many were blacklisted. This process was in stark contrast to what happened in West Germany after the war, when few ex-Nazis were treated in this manner.|Bruni de la Motte|[https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/nov/08/1989-berlin-wall]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This coincided with a housing crisis as well as the mass seizure of workers’ homes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|In the GDR everyone had a legally guaranteed security of tenure and ownership to the properties where they lived. After unification, 2.2m claims by non-GDR citizens were made on their homes. Many lost houses they’d lived in for decades; a number committed suicide rather than give them up. Ironically, claims for restitution the other way around, by East Germans on properties in the West, were rejected as “out of time”.|Bruni de la Motte|[https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/nov/08/1989-berlin-wall]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She remarks that since the short twentieth century, many people have come to appreciate the benefits that the socialists offered:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Since the demise of the GDR, many have come to recognize and regret that the genuine “social achievements” they enjoyed were dismantled: social and gender equality, full employment and lack of existential fears, as well as subsidized rents, public transport, culture and sports facilities. Unfortunately, the collapse of the GDR and “state socialism” came shortly before the collapse of the “free market” system in the west.|Bruni de la Motte|[https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/nov/08/1989-berlin-wall]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is supported by the fact that (as mentioned above) 57% of former East Germans say that life was better in the planned economy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:Cite book| publisher = Artery Publications| isbn = 9978-0-9558228-3-4| last1 = de la Motte| first1 = Bruni| last2 = Green |first2 = John| title = Stasi Hell or Workers' Paradise? Socialism in the GDR: What Can We Learn From It?| year = 2009| url = https://archive.org/stream/StasiHellOrWorkersParadise}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bruni de la Motte explains this thus:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The GDR experience of socialism stands in marked contrast to the dismantling of the welfare state and the concomitant rampant privatization of every aspect of life now taking place in Western Europe, from culture to healthcare and other essential services, as well as to the denial of social values and the extreme individualization of life. We live in an atomized society, rapidly falling apart, with little social ethos and no long-term goals. Many today, especially young people, are living without hope or sense of a secure future. Socialism can still offer an antidote and an alternative. And the experience of socialist countries like the GDR can provide pointers for a way forward and help renew one’s hope.|Bruni de la Motte|[https://archive.org/stream/StasiHellOrWorkersParadise]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economy ==&lt;br /&gt;
Despite all of the aforementioned significant disadvantages, the GDR’s economy managed to overcome its difficulties and develop at an unusually rapid rate. This is especially true in terms of heavy industry:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|During the 1950s, East Germany made significant economic progress, at least as indicated by the gross figures. By 1960 investment had grown by a factor of about 4.5, while gross industrial production had increased by a factor of about 2.9. Within that broad category of industrial production, the basic sectors, such as machinery and transport equipment, grew especially rapidly, while the consumer sectors such as textiles lagged behind.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the priority given to heavy industry, consumption also increased steadily during this period:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Consumption grew significantly in the first years, although from a very low base, and showed respectable growth rates over the entire decade.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1949 to the late 1960s the consumption of meat, dairy, eggs, fish, sugar, tea, and alcohol all increased.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:Cite book| publisher = Monthly Review Press| last = Turgeon| first = Lynn| title = Transitional Economic Systems, The Polish-Czech Example| year = 1972| url = https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7iUwYR74MlbcFBxbWxsdHNLMHM| page = xv}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the end of the 1950s, some analysts feared an economic crisis in the East, spurred by the ‘brain drain’ from East to West; however, this did not occur, and the GDR’s economy continued to grow impressively in the 1960s.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|As the 1950s ended, pessimism about the future seemed rather appropriate. Surprisingly, however, after the construction of the [[Berlin Wall]] and several years of consolidation and realignment, East Germany entered a period of impressive economic growth that produced clear benefits for the people. For the years 1966–1970, GDP and national income grew at average annual rates of 6.3 and 5.2 percent, respectively. Simultaneously, investment grew at an average annual rate of 10.7 percent, retail trade at 4.6 percent, and real per capita income at 4.2 percent.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This growth continued on through the next decade:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|As of 1970, growth rates in the various sectors of the economy did not differ greatly from those of a decade earlier. […] Production reached about 140 to 150 percent of the levels of a decade earlier. […] The growth rates in production resulted in substantial increases in personal consumption. [T]hroughout the 1970s the East German economy as a whole enjoyed relatively strong and stable growth. In 1971, First Secretary Honecker declared the “raising of the material and cultural living standard” of the population to be a “principal task” of the economy; private consumption grew at an average annual rate of 4.8 percent from 1971 to 1975 and 4.0 percent from 1976 to 1980. […] The 1976–1980 Five Year Plan achieved an average annual growth rate of 4.1 percent.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1980s saw some economic difficulties for the GDR as Western banks clamped down on credit for the East and the USSR reduced oil deliveries by ten percent. This led to a period of slow growth as the GDR rushed to step up exports; despite this, the economy did manage to pull through and deliver impressive growth results during this period (though it did fall short of the plan).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The 1981–1985 plan period proved to be a difficult time for the East German economy. […] However, by the end of the period the economy had chalked up a respectable overall performance, with an average annual growth rate of 4.5 percent (the plan target had been 5.1 percent).|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The overall impacts of the industrialization strategy of the GDR were extremely positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Industry is the dominant sector of the East German economy, and is the principal basis for the relatively high standard of living. East Germany ranks among the world's top industrial nations, and in the Comecon it ranks second only to the Soviet Union.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Infrastructure ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The East German standard of living has improved greatly since 1949 [when the GDR was established]. Most observers, both East and West, agree that in the 1980s East Germans enjoyed the highest standard of living in Eastern Europe. Major improvements occurred, especially after 1971, when the Honecker regime announced its commitment to fulfilling the “principal task” of the economy, which was defined as the enhancement of the material and cultural well-being of all citizens.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This focus on increasing quality of life for all citizens, rather than providing profit for the capitalist class, is a unique feature of the planned economy, which provided steadily improving living standards:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Since the inception of the regime, the monthly earned income of the average East German has increased steadily in terms of effective purchasing power. According to the 1986 East German statistical yearbook, the average monthly income for workers in the socialized sector of the economy increased from 311 GDR marks in 1950 to 555 GDR marks in 1960, 755 GDR marks in 1970, and 1,130 GDR marks in 1985. Because most consumer prices had been stable during this time, the 1985 figure represented a better-than-threefold increase over the past thirty-five years.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
State subsidies meant that basic necessities (food, housing, and so forth), public services (healthcare, education, etc.), and even small luxuries (restaurant meals, concerts, etc.) were all remarkably cheap, especially when compared to the capitalist West:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|In East Germany, the GDR mark can purchase a great number of basic necessities because the state subsidies their production and distribution to the people. Thus housing, which consumes a considerable portion of the earnings of an average family in the West, constituted less than 3 percent of the expenditures of a typical worker family in 1984. Milk, potatoes, bread, and public transportation were also relatively cheap. Many services, such as medical care and education, continued to be available without cost to all but a very few. Even restaurant meals, concerts, and postage stamps were inexpensive by Western standards. […] In the mid-1980s, East Germans had no difficulty obtaining meat, butter, potatoes, bread, clothing, and most other essentials.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GDR also greatly improved the housing situation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Beginning in the 1960s, the government initiated a major campaign to provide modern housing facilities; it sought to eliminate the longstanding housing shortage, and modernize fully the existing stock by 1990. By the early 1980s, the program had provided nearly 2 million new or renovated units, and 2 million more were to be added by 1990. As of 1985, progress in this area appeared to be satisfactory, and plan targets were being met or exceeded.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The situation in terms of consumer goods was also improving; the US Federal Research Division reports that as of 1985 in the GDR, 99 percent of households had a refrigerator, 92 percent had a washing machine, and 93 percent had a television. These numbers are compatible to the United States in 2016 (though washing machine ownership was higher, and TV ownership slightly lower, in the GDR). Economists had often thought that the GDR mark was weaker in terms of purchasing power than the West German D-mark; however, a study from the Institute for Economic Research in West Berlin (as reported by the US Federal Research Division) disproved this idea:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|In 1983, the Institute for Economic Research in West Berlin undertook one of its periodic studies in which the purchasing power of the GDR mark was measured against that of the West German D-mark. […] The Institute concluded that, as a whole, the GDR mark should be considered to have 106 percent of the value of the D-mark in purchasing power, an impressive gain over the 76 percent estimated for 1960, 86 percent for 1969, and 100 percent for 1977. [T]he analysis clearly invalidated the view commonly held in the West that the GDR mark had very little purchasing power.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Health ===&lt;br /&gt;
The GDR provided medical treatment free of charge to its people. This system allowed them to keep up with West Germany in terms of healthcare conditions, despite the latter being wealthier (by virtue of its extensive trade relations with developed nations). The ''Health Care Financing Review'' (a US government-affiliated publication) reports:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|In terms of real resources devoted to health services and in terms of health service activities, the two countries seem to have been fairly similar. The GDR was reported as having 2.3 physicians per thousand in 1985 (World Health Organization, 1987), compared with 2.6 in the FRG. In 1977, the GDR was reported as having 10.6 hospital beds per thousand, compared with 11.8 in the FRG, and both countries had similar levels of dentists and pharmacists per thousand. Hospital length of stay was reported as similar in the two countries, Given that hospital beds per thousand were similar, this suggests that admission rates were not very different. Finally, consultation rates with doctors seem to have been similar in the two countries at 9.0 per person in the GDR in 1976 and 10.9 per person in the FRG in 1975 (Health OECD: Facts and Trends, forthcoming). If the GDR enjoyed a similar volume of health services to the FRG but had much lower health expenditures per capita, then the prices of health services must have been much lower in the GDR.|Health Care Financing Review|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193657]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The GDR maintained high healthcare standards, which improved steadily, and in some cases faster than those in the West (though starting at a lower level; Eastern Germany had always been worse-off in terms of health than the West):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Turning to health status, in 1987, the reported expectation of life at birth in eastern Germany, 69.9 years for males and 76.0 for females, was not far behind that of western Germany at 72.2 for males and 78.9 for females. The infant mortality rate, which had been 7.2 per 100 in 1950, had fallen to 0.92 in 1986. Although the infant mortality rate was above that of western Germany in 1986 (0.85), the fall since 1950 had been larger. If the official figures can be believed, the former GDR had respectable health statistics for a country with its standard of living. […] Improvements to health status in eastern Germany seem to have kept up, more or less, with those in western Germany.|Health Care Financing Review|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4193657]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Life expectancy in the German Democratic Republic was higher than that in Austria, Australia, Belgium, the British Empire, Canada, Italy, Switzerland, and West Germany.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nybooks.com/?p=24687&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Education ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Attendance at kindergarten was not mandatory, but the majority of children from ages three to six attended. The state considered kindergartens an important element of the overall educational program. The schools focused on health and physical fitness, development of socialist values, and the teaching of rudimentary skills. The regime has experimented with combined schools of childcare centers and kindergartens, which introduce the child gradually into a more regimented program of activities and ease the pains of adjustment. In 1985 there were 13,148 preschools providing care for 788,095 children (about 91 percent of children eligible to attend).|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After this, children entered the compulsory stage of education:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Compulsory education began at the age of six, when every child entered the ten-grade, coeducational general poly-technical school. The program was divided into three sections. The primary stage included grades one through three, where children were taught the basic skills of reading, writing, and mathematics. The primary stage also introduced children to the fundamentals of good citizenship and, in accordance with the 1965 education law, provided them with their “first knowledge and understanding of nature, work, and socialist society.” Instruction emphasized German language, literature, and art as a means of developing the child's expressive and linguistic skills; about 60 percent of classroom time was devoted to this component. Mathematics instruction accounted for about 24 percent of the curriculum and included an introduction to fundamental mathematical laws and relations. Another 8 percent was devoted to physical education, which comprised exercises, games, and activities designed to develop coordination and physical skill. Poly-technical instruction was also begun at the primary level and consisted of gardening and crafts that gave the child a basic appreciation of technology, the economy, and the worker; about 8 percent of classroom time was allotted to such instruction.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After completing mandatory education, students had several choices:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Upon completion of the compulsory ten-year education, the student had essentially three options. The most frequently chosen option was to begin a two-year period of vocational training. In 1985 about 86 percent of those who had completed their ten-year course of study began some kind of vocational training. During vocational training, the student became an apprentice, usually at a local or state enterprise. Students received eighteen months of training in selected vocations and specialized in the final six months. In 1985 approximately 6 percent of those who had completed their poly-technical education entered a three-year program of vocational training. This program led to the ''Abitur'', or end-of-school examination. Passing the ''Abitur'' enabled the student to apply to a technical institute or university, although this route to higher education was considered very difficult. In 1985 East Germany had a total of 963 vocational schools; 719 were connected with industries, and another 244 were municipal vocational schools. Vocational schools served 377,567 students.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Students were guaranteed a job upon completing the ten-year compulsory education:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The educational system’s major goal was producing technically qualified personnel to fill the manpower needs of the economy. The government guaranteed employment to those who completed the mandatory ten-year program.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The university system was also of remarkably high-quality, and attendance was extremely inexpensive (though entrance requirements were very competitive):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|In 1985 East Germany had 54 universities and colleges, with a total enrollment of 129,628 students. Women made up about 50 percent of the student population. Courses in engineering and technology headed the list of popular subjects. Medicine, economics, and education were also popular choices. There were 239 technical institutions, with a total student population of 162,221. About 61 percent of the students studied full time, while the remainder enrolled in correspondence study or took evening classes. The three most popular fields of study at the institutes were medicine and health, engineering and technology, and economics. Courses at the university and technical institutes consisted primarily of lectures and examinations. Completion of the program led to a diploma or license, depending on the field of study.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As of the mid-1980s, higher education was very inexpensive, and many of the textbooks were provided free of charge. Full or partial financial assistance in the form of scholarships was available for most students, and living expenses were generally minimal because most students continued to live at home during their courses of study. Germans have a high regard for education, and the regime has generally supported young people who have wanted to upgrade their level of skills through further training or education.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Culture ==&lt;br /&gt;
Inexpensive cultural activities such as theaters and concerts were widely available.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:Cite book| publisher = Artery Publications| isbn = 9978-0-9558228-3-4| last1 = de la Motte| first1 = Bruni| last2 = Green |first2 = John| title = Stasi Hell or Workers' Paradise? Socialism in the GDR: What Can We Learn From It?| year = 2009| url = https://archive.org/stream/StasiHellOrWorkersParadise| pages = 29–30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Gender relations ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The East German record in the area of women’s rights has been good. Women have been well-represented in the work force, comprising about half of the economically active population. As of 1984, approx. 80 percent of women of working age (between eighteen and sixty) were employed. The state has encouraged women to seek work and pursue careers and has provided aid to working mothers in the form of day-care centers generous maternity benefits.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Women’s access to education was very strong in the GDR, again much stronger than in the capitalist West:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The state also has made a concerted effort to provide educational opportunities for women. The number of women with a university or technical school education has increased over the years. Of the students enrolled in universities and colleges in 1985, about 50 percent were women.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Birth control was widely-available and free of cost, and abortion was available upon the bearer’s request:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|A liberal abortion law, promulgated in 1972 amid protests from religious circles, permits abortion upon request of the mother. […] As of the mid 1980s, information on contraceptive methods was available to the public, and women could obtain birth control pills at no cost.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the GDR sought to provide assistance to working mothers through a highly-developed child-care system:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|An elaborate network of daycare centers provides care for the child while the mother is at work. In 1984 there were 6,605 year-round nurseries with room for 296,653 children. These nurseries provided care for 63 percent of eligible children.|US Federal Research Division|[https://archive.org/stream/eastgermanycount00bura_0]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Cuisine ===&lt;br /&gt;
The German Democratic Republic had their own foods, such as Spreewald pickles, Mocha Fix, Schnittchen, and Schnitzel, among others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:GDR]][[Category:History]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bourgeoisie&amp;diff=1710535</id>
		<title>Bourgeoisie</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Bourgeoisie&amp;diff=1710535"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:45:43Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''capitalist class''' or '''bourgeoisie''' (from the French term &amp;quot;bourgeois&amp;quot;, meaning: from the city) is the ruling [[class]] of the economic and political system of [[capitalism]]. It is characterized by owning large quantities of [[capital]], and [[Wage labour|hiring]] [[proletariat|proletarian]] laborers to produce commodities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whereas the proletariat is the subject, exploited, disposed class in capitalist society, the bourgeoisie is the master, exploitative, and possessor class. The bourgeoisie owns the [[means of production]] and the means of living, including, but not limited to: factories, farmland, workshops, offices, and even housing. The proletariat and bourgeoisie stand in direct opposition to one another, and their differences are irreconcilable, resulting in [[class struggle]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Origins ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Historically, the bourgeoisie emerged as artisans and petty tradesman during the late stages of [[feudalism]], and from there clashed with their rivals, the landlords of the estates. Feudal states were often [[physiocracy|physiocratic]], preventing the bourgeois from industrializing (Marx details this hypocritical struggle in his second manuscript of his [[Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts]] of 1844. [22]), as well as [[protectionism|protectionist]], preventing the bourgeois from gaining wealth through [[foreign trade]]. [[Bourgeois revolution|Bourgeois revolutions]] throughout the 18th and 19th centuries in Western Europe and the Americas destroyed most of feudalism, ushering in [[liberal capitalism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{NavClasses}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Proletariat&amp;diff=1710533</id>
		<title>Proletariat</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Proletariat&amp;diff=1710533"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:43:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''proletariat''' is the [[working class]] under [[capitalism]]. While unlike [[slavery|slaves]] and [[feudalism|serfs]] proletarians aren't bound to any particular master, they also do not have any significant [[property]] of their own, and can only subsist by selling their [[labour power|ability to labour]] as a [[commodity]] on the market. The resulting [[relation of production]] is called [[wage labour]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The pre-capitalist proletariat ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the proletariat only became the dominant working class around the time of the [[industrial revolution]], free legal citizens without any significant property of their own have existed in various societies throughout history. In fact, the term &amp;quot;proletariat&amp;quot; isn't a modern invention, and goes back to the [[Roman Republic]], where the ''proletarii'' were the poorest among the [[plebeians]]. Because of their lack of wealth they were ineligible for military service, and only notable in census records for producing children. This offspring was significant because they could later become free citizens of newly conquered territory. The Latin word for &amp;quot;offspring&amp;quot; is ''prōlēs'', and hence the people who did nothing much but produce them were called ''proletarii'', meaning &amp;quot;those who produce offspring.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the Marian military reforms of 107 BC, proletarians were allowed to serve as disposable skirmishers in the Roman army. This turned the Roman military from a militia composed of wealthy citizens with a stake in the Roman state, to a professional army loyal mainly to their military commanders, who were their main source of income. In this way, the rise of the Roman proletariat opened the way for the achievements of [[Julius Caesar]] and the [[Roman Empire]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The proletariat under capitalism  ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the agrarian nature of feudalism, and the small-scale, [[petit bourgeois]] nature of most production at the time, the proletariat hardly existed as a class in feudal times. They developed during the land enclosures, which forced the smallest of peasants off of their land and forced them to find work in the cities; at the same time, technological advancement allowed industrial production to develop, which destroyed the livelihoods of small craftspeople. The new industrial [[bourgeoisie]] made use of dispossessed former peasants and former craftspeople to labor in their factories.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As production in countries becomes more and more industrialized and advanced, the various petit bourgeois classes are absorbed, mostly into the proletariat (although some lucky few will climb to the ranks of the bourgeoisie). The end result is that the central contradiction of capitalism, that between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, grows deeper and more significant.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{NavClasses}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=George_Soros&amp;diff=1710531</id>
		<title>George Soros</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=George_Soros&amp;diff=1710531"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:41:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''George Soros''' is a Hungarian-American billionaire investor and philanthropist,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news| url= http://www.businessinsider.com/george-soros-billionaire-investor-profile-2017-1|title=The incredible life of billionaire investing legend George Soros| newspaper= Business Insider|access-date=February 2, 2017}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news|url=https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-bearish-george-soros-is-trading-again-1465429163|title=A Bearish George Soros Is Trading Again |last=Zuckerman| first= Gregory| date= June 9, 2016|newspaper= [[The Wall Street Journal]]|issn=0099-9660|access-date=February 2, 2017}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; who as of May 2020 has a net worth of $8.3 billion,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;daily&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web| url= https://www.bloomberg.com/billionaires| title= Bloomberg Billionaires| website= Bloomberg.com| access-date= February 6, 2015}} Note that this site is updated daily.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|title=George Soros|url=https://www.forbes.com/profile/george-soros/|access-date=2020-07-09|website=Forbes}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; having donated more than $32 billion to the Open Society Foundations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/people/george-soros|title=George Soros|website=Open Society Foundations|access-date=December 13, 2018}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is a graduate of the London School of Economics and his most important influence is the antisocialist [[Karl Popper]]. At one point he appointed his own tax lawyer to the Human Rights Watch Board, exposing himself to ridicule and charges of cronyism.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Treanor&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|last=Treanor|first=Paul|title=Who is behind Human Rights Watch?|url=http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/HRW.html|year=2004}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros has funded the color revolutions&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zourabichvili, Salomé (April 2008). &amp;quot;Article&amp;quot;. Herodote. French Institute for Geopolitics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as well as pushing for the dissolution of the [[Soviet Union]], working with the [[CIA]] to accomplish such.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20190424090512/https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/12/09/soros-and-his-cia-friends-targeted-ussr-russia-1987/ Soros and His CIA Friends Targeted USSR/Russia in 1987]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He does not claim to be a [[Marxist]] or [[socialist]] and doesn’t act like one either, but is rather an opportunistic [[neoliberal]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== old article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Infobox person&lt;br /&gt;
| name        = George Soros&lt;br /&gt;
| image       = George Soros HighRes.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
| birth_date  = August 12, 1930&lt;br /&gt;
| birth_place = Budapest, Hungary&lt;br /&gt;
| nationality = Hungarian&lt;br /&gt;
| spouse      = Annaliese Witschak (1960–1983),&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Susan Weber Soros (1983–2005),&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Tamiko Bolton (2013–)&lt;br /&gt;
| religion    = [[Atheism]]&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Atheist&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20120512145053/http://georgesoros.com/faqs/entry/georgesorosviewsonreligion/ Religion]. ''GeorgeSoros.com'' (archived at ''web.archive.org''). Retrieved October 27, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.aim.org/aim-column/atheist-soros-funds-catholic-groups/ Atheist Soros Funds Catholic Groups], [[Accuracy In Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.weeklystandard.com/article/493222 George Soros's Evangelicals], [[Weekly Standard]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Powe, Alicia (October 31, 2017). [https://www.wnd.com/2017/10/investigative-journalist-george-soros-thinks-hes-a-god/ Investigative journalist: George Soros thinks he's 'a god']. ''WND''. Retrieved October 27, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''George Soros''' (born August 12, 1930) is an [[anti-Semitic]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See section below on Soros' anti-Semitism.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[atheist]],&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Atheist&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; international financier and con artist who bankrolled the presidential campaigns of [[Barack Obama]] and [[Hillary Clinton]], among other [[left-wing]] causes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkwood, R. Cort (July 17, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/item/29560-soros-believes-liberal-democracy-endangered-soros-chagrined Soros Believes Liberal Democracy Endangered]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 17, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is officially the 190th richest person on the planet,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;forbes&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/list/5/#version:static The World's Billionaires]. ''[[Forbes]]''. Retrieved August 21, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; but his ranking is so low because he transferred $18 billion of his wealth to his organizations in 2017.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transfer&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/17/business/george-soros-open-society-foundations.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He manages the funds of many other of the world's richest people. Soros' organization, the [[Open Society Foundations]], is responsible for financing postmodernist, Neo-Marxist organizations for his personal gain. As [[Snopes.com]] noted,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/riot-act/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it devotes $2.6 billion to advance left-wing [[Social justice warrior|SJW]] priorities which in reality promote [[feminism]], [[Islam]], [[illegal drugs]], [[prostitution]], and [[homosexuality]]. He has attacked Jews, falsely claiming they cause [[anti-Semitism]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JewsIsraelCause&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.jta.org/2003/11/10/archive/in-rare-jewish-appearance-george-soros-says-jews-and-israel-cause-anti-semitism In Rare Jewish Appearance, George Soros Says Jews and Israel Cause Anti- Semitism]. ''Jewish Telegraphic Agency''. November 10, 2003. Retrieved October 27, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros has been aiding various radical anti-Israel groups. Including via his NIF foundation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.algemeiner.com/2016/08/16/email-leak-exposes-george-soros-anti-israel-agenda/ &amp;quot;Email Leak Exposes George Soros' Anti-Israel Agenda.&amp;quot; ''Algemeiner'', Aug 16, 2016]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://zoa.org/2018/04/10377896-netanyahu-soros-backed-new-israel-fund-seeking-to-erase-israels-jewish-character/ &amp;quot;Netanyahu: Soros-Backed New Israel Fund Seeking to ‘Erase’ Israel’s Jewish Character.&amp;quot; ZOA, April 16, 2018]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros is a naturalized [[American]] citizen, born in [[Hungary]] where he worked for the [[Nazi]]s as a teenager, fingering and looting his compatriot [[Jews]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xPmKmfULrGI&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He is a [[leftist]] and [[elitist]] whose current net worth is estimated to be about $8 billion, not including the $18 billion of his wealth that he transferred to his organizations in 2017.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Transfer&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;  He is considered by many to be a modern robber baron.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2006/08/george_soros_and_the_shadow_de.html George Soros and the Shadow Democratic Party], [[American Thinker]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Calls for his arrest due to currency manipulation and other crimes have reverberated around the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-08/how-george-soros-singlehandedly-created-european-refugee-crisis-and-why&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1992, Soros earned the title, ''&amp;quot;the man who broke the Bank of England&amp;quot;'',&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gurufocus.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.gurufocus.com/news.php?id=79010 Stocks Soros And Druckenmiller Have In Common, Gurufocus.com, December 14, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for shorting the [[British]] Pound. He made a $1 billion profit under the $10 billion deal. Soros is also credited with collapsing the Malaysia financial market.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ASpectator&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://spectator.org/archives/2009/11/04/killing-capitalism-soros-style/ Killing Capitalism Soros-Style], [[American Spectator]], November 4, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soros has been described as a &amp;quot;psychopath's [[psychopath]]&amp;quot;. Soros has been a major player in the [[European migrant crisis]], having donated one half billion dollars for the transport and resettlement of 6 million illegal Muslim aliens in Europe rather than [[Saudi Arabia]] or the Gulf States, richer countries, geographically closer, with a common Islamic culture for Muslim migrants. As an illustration of how [[far-left]] Soros is, he claimed in 2017 that the [[conservative]] government of [[Hungary]]'s [[Viktor Orbán]] – a vocal critic of Soros – &amp;quot;is more oppressive than it was during the Russian occupation,&amp;quot; referring to when Hungary was a Communist satellite state of the USSR.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dunai, Marton (December 1, 2017). [https://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFKBN1DV4XV Hungary PM Orban, U.S. financier Soros clash as elections loom]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved December 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.rt.com/news/411693-orban-soros-election-interference/ Hungarian PM Orban says George Soros will interfere in election, vows to stop him]. ''RT''. December 2, 2017. Retrieved December 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Early life ==&lt;br /&gt;
Soros was born August 12, 1930, in Budapest, [[Hungary]].  His parents were Elizabeth and Tivadar Soros.  Tivadar, who sometimes went by Teodoro Ŝvarc,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://esperanto.net/literaturo/autor/svarc.html Teo Ŝvarc / Teodoro Schwartz / Tivadar Soros]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was an active Esperantist.  George Soros grew up learning Esperanto from his father.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://m.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/hdinx/til_billionaire_george_soros_is_a_native_speaker/ Billionaire George Soros is a native speaker of the constructed language Esperanto]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2007/10/the_religious_quest_of_george.html The Religious Quest of George Soros]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Soros' birth name was György Schwartz, his family name was changed in 1936 from Schwartz to Soros to avoid [[antisemitism]].  The name &amp;quot;Soros&amp;quot; is itself derived from an esperanto word &amp;quot;''Sori''&amp;quot;, which means &amp;quot;To Soar&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/george-soros/2015/05/14/id/644564/ George Soros Facts: 7 Things You Might Not Know About Billionaire], [[NewsMax]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  George Soros later said that he &amp;quot;grew up in a [[Jewish]], anti-semitic home,&amp;quot; and that his parents were &amp;quot;uncomfortable with their religious roots.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite|author=Slater, R. |title=&amp;quot;Soros: The Unauthorized Biography&amp;quot;, page 30 |publisher=McGraw-Hill |date= 09-30-2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soros is an [[Atheism|atheist]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?sid=1852 Atheist George Soros Funds MoveOn.org Traditional Values Coalition, August 27, 2004]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1947, George Soros emigrated from Hungary to London, where an event occurred that greatly influenced the development of George's personality and worldview. After taking a temporary job as a railroad porter around Christmas time, he broke his leg and was cared for by the [[National Health Service]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=6W3_AgAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA4 The Philanthropy of George Soros: Building Open Societies]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; free of charge, while the Jewish relief agencies of that era did not offer him the help he believed they owed him. In that event was born Soros' favorable opinion of Democratic Socialism, and his negative view of many Jewish groups.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros' immediate family joined him in the West in the mid-Fifties.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his autobiography, entitled ''Soros on Soros'',  he described how as a teenager he helped to cart off the stolen possessions of Hungarian Jewish men, women and children after they were rounded up and transported to [[Concentration camp|death camps]]. He claims it never bothered him a bit, and still doesn't bother him today.  He has no personal regrets about his actions. Soros, a reputed [[psychopath]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.americanthinker.com/2007/10/soros_the_guiltless.html Soros the Guiltless], [[American Thinker]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://uk.biz.yahoo.com/08042009/404/investment-greats-george-soros.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.softcom.net/users/greebo/psychopath.htm Psychopathic Personalities]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; gave a self-serving interview to Steve Kroft of ''[[CBSNews]]'' ''60 Minutes'' in response to his version on events and actions, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
KROFT: No feeling of guilt?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. SOROS: No.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.youngcons.com/we-found-it-behold-the-60-minutes-interview-george-soros-thought-was-buried/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/HXqty2rkUDY&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Career==&lt;br /&gt;
During his years in London, Soros worked for his first job in finance at Singer &amp;amp; Friedlander, a merchant bank founded in 1907.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=v_-dfpjo3rcC&amp;amp;pg=PA17 Boomerang: Travels in the New Third World]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 1956 he moved to New York, working for the firm F. M. Mayer.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=tDpBFn5-AwwC&amp;amp;pg=PA288 Tea Party Factor]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Soros became an American citizen on December 18, 1961.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;movesmarkets&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/1993-08-22/the-man-who-moves-markets The Man Who Moves Markets]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Britishpound-crash-soros.jpg|right|400px|thumb| Chart showing the effects of Soros manipulating the British Pound in 1992.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 1992, Soros earned the title, ''&amp;quot;the man who broke the Bank of England&amp;quot;'',&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gurufocus.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; for shorting the [[British]] Pound. He made a $1 billion profit under the $10 billion deal. Soros is also credited with collapsing the financial markets of Malaysia&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1997-sep-22-fi-34969-story.html Malaysian Leader, Soros Trade Barbs]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by shorting the baht.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.businessinsider.com/how-george-soros-broke-the-bank-of-thailand-2016-9?op=1 Here's how George Soros broke the Bank of Thailand]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  He was also accused of manipulation by Indonesia&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,9574,00.html Asian Tiger in Currency Crisis]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and in 2013 shorted the Japanese Yen.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324432004578302461873792762 U.S. Funds Score Big by Betting Against Yen ]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Personal Ambition===&lt;br /&gt;
George Soros said in a June 1993 interview with ''The Independent'' that he saw himself as “some kind of god, the creator of everything.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''The Billionaire Who Built on Chaos – George Soros'' (The Independent: June 3, 1993)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Two years later, he portrayed himself as someone who shared numerous attributes with “God in the Old Testament” ― “[Y]ou know, like invisible. I was pretty invisible. Benevolent. I was pretty benevolent. All-seeing. I tried to be all-seeing.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,602163,00.html Glenn Beck: Making of the Puppet Master]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soros told his biographer Michael Kaufman that his “goal” was nothing less ambitious than “to become the conscience of the world” by using his charitable foundations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4635465 George Soros Discusses Efforts to Spread Democracy], [[NPR]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In his 1991 book ''Underwriting Democracy'', Soros said: &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|If truth be known, I carried some rather potent messianic fantasies with me from childhood,” fantasies which “I wanted to indulge … to the extent that I could afford.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Soros, ''Underwriting Democracy'', p. 3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros stated in his 1987 book ''The Alchemy of Finance'':  &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|I admit that I have always harbored an exaggerated view of self-importance―to put it bluntly, I fancied myself as some kind of god or an economic reformer like Keynes or, even better, a scientist like Einstein.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;George Soros, ''The Alchemy of Finance'' (1994 edition), p. 362&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Soros wrote in ''The Age of Fallibility: Consequences of the War on Terror'': &lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=sorosquotes&amp;gt;[https://www.theblaze.com/stories/in-his-own-words-an-examination-of-some-of-soros-socioeconomic-philosophies/ In His Own Words: An Examination of Some of Soros’ Socioeconomic Philosophies], [[The Blaze]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros has been unapologetically critical of U.S. military interventions. In his book ''Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism'', he spells out his criticism:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|It may be shocking to say, but I believe that the current unilateralist posture of the United States constitutes a serious threat to the peace and prosperity of the world.&amp;lt;ref name=sorosquotes/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros believes that capitalism is the enemy of the open society and that the solution is to regulate markets that are not governed by capitalism. Referencing the state of the world following the collapse of the Soviet empire, Soros said:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist but the capitalist threat.&amp;lt;ref name=sorosquotes/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Political Influence ==&lt;br /&gt;
Soros uses his billions of dollars to influence government politics. In 1989, Soros financed [[Vaclav Havel]]'s rise to power in the [[Czech Republic]]'s &amp;quot;Velvet Revolution&amp;quot;. He has acknowledged having orchestrated coups in Croatia, Georgia, Slovakia, and Yugoslavia.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Discover&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late March 2002, Soros announced he was giving three million dollars to Budapest Open Access Initiative to set up open-archiving systems. Soros was accused of &amp;quot;foolishly spending millions &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[to]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; undermining libraries, librarians, authors and referees&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/1885931.stm |title=Critics attack net journal initiative |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros personally has made campaign contributions to [[Democrat]] political candidates; [[Barack Obama]], [[Hillary Clinton]], [[Charles Rangel]], [[Al Franken]], Tom Udall, Joe Sestak, [[Sherrod Brown]], [[Nancy Pelosi]], and [[Al Gore]].&amp;lt;ref name=aim&amp;gt;[http://www.aim.org/aim-column/soros-money-financed-communist-van-jones/ Soros Money Financed Communist Van Jones]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Additionally, in 2007 and 2008 the groups ''Green For All'' and the ''Ella Baker Center'' were receiving money from Soros' main organization, the Open Society Institute.  [[Van Jones]], a self-described Communist, was the leader of both these groups at the time.&amp;lt;ref name=aim /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2004 U.S. presidential election ===&lt;br /&gt;
During the [[United States presidential election, 2004]], George Soros donated $23,581,000 to various [[liberal]] 527 Groups dedicated to defeating President [[George W. Bush]].  Soros contributed $3 million to the [[leftist]] [[propaganda|propagandist]] [[Center for American Progress]] and $5 million to [[radical leftist]] [[MoveOn.org]].  He was the founder of the [[Open Society Institute]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Soros has personally expressed a strong dislike of [[President Bush]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;soros2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/comment/dsouza200410190831.asp |title=The World According to Soros |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2004 he stated defeating Bush was &amp;quot;the central focus of my life,&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;a matter of life and death.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;soros3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A24179-2003Nov10?language=printer|title=Soros's Deep Pockets vs. Bush |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A24179-2003Nov10?language=printer |title=Soros's Deep Pockets vs. Bush |accessdate=2007-09-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He also said &amp;quot;America, under Bush, is a danger to the world&amp;quot; and claimed &amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;[Bush]&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; is undermining American values&amp;quot;. He says he &amp;quot;been demonized by the Bush campaign&amp;quot; and donated more than 15.5 million in a failed attempt to defeat Bush in 2004.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;soros3&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0928-16.htm |title=Why We Must Not Re-elect President Bush |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5476317 |title=George Soros, Maintaining Political Interest |accessdate=2007-10-05}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros likened Republicans generally, and the Bush administration, in particular, to &amp;quot;the Nazi and communist regimes&amp;quot; in the sense that they are &amp;quot;all engaged in the politics of fear.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Discover&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:SorosCartoonsmall.JPG|left|300px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2008 U.S. presidential election ===&lt;br /&gt;
In the [[United States presidential election, 2008]], Soros' [[Shadow Party]] was again a major force in the movement that not only expanded the Democratic Party's congressional majorities but also delivered the presidency to Barack Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://canadafreepress.com/article/soros-its-not-easy-being-god Soros:  It’s Not Easy Being God]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://humanevents.com/2010/09/09/the-obamasoros-connection/ The Obama-Soros Connection], [[Human Events]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2016 U.S. presidential election===&lt;br /&gt;
Soros donated heavily to [[Hillary Clinton]] in the [[United States presidential election, 2016|2016 U.S. presidential election]], donating tens-of-millions of dollars to her campaign and organizations affiliated with it.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ClintonEmbracesSoros&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Chaos&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; In the weeks after Republican [[Donald Trump]]'s election as U.S. president in 2016, Soros lost almost $1 billion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zuckerman, Gregory; Chung, Juliet (January 13, 2017). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/billionaire-george-soros-lost-nearly-1-billion-in-weeks-after-trump-election-1484227167 Billionaire George Soros Lost Nearly $1 Billion in Weeks After Trump Election]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved January 14, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://insider.foxnews.com/2017/01/13/trumps-victory-reportedly-cost-george-soros-nearly-billion-dollars Report: George Soros Lost Nearly a Billion Dollars in the Market After Trump Win]. ''Fox News Insider''. January 13, 2017. Retrieved January 14, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Obama and Soros Connection ===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, Soros held a [[Barack Obama]] fundraiser for his campaign in the U.S. Senate. Obama visited Soros office in New York, December 2006. January 2007, Obama started to campaign for the presidency. Within hours of announcing his candidacy, Soros had donated the maximum allowed by law to the Obama campaign.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Discover&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; Soros has visited the White House at least four times in 2009 and has influence with other frequent White House visitors. Soros and members of his family contributed a total of $60,000 directly to Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Christopher Drew and Mike McIntire, &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03/us/politics/03obama.htm After 2000 Loss, Obama Built Donor Network From Roots Up],&amp;quot; ''[[The New York Times]]'', April 3, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In August 2009, Obama announced he was giving $2 billion in U.S. tax dollars to state-owned oil company Petroleo Brasileiro SA of [[Brazil]] for offshore oil drilling. At the same time, George Soros increased his stake $811 million in the same oil company. According to Bloomberg Press, 22% of the $3.68 billion of stocks and American depositary receipts of Petroleo Brasileiro are held by Soros Fund Management LLC.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/277955 Obama commits to off-shore drilling, Digital Journal, August 20, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2016, Soros and his organizations had very close access to the U.S. State Department and attempted to influence U.S. policy on migration and the situation in Ukraine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Solomon, John (August 7, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/456619-george-soross-secret-2016-access-to-state-exposes-big-money-hypocrisy-of-democrats George Soros's secret 2016 access to State exposes 'big money' hypocrisy of Democrats]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved August 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite his support for Obama and their shared political views, Soros called Obama &amp;quot;actually my greatest disappointment&amp;quot; because he did not give enough attention to Soros.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Caplan, Joshua (July 18, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/18/george-soros-calls-barack-obama-his-greatest-disappointment/ George Soros Calls Barack Obama His ‘Greatest Disappointment’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 18, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Brown, Benjamin (July 18, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/18/george-soros-calls-obama-greatest-disappointment-says-doesnt-particularly-want-to-be-democrat.html George Soros calls Obama 'greatest disappointment,' says he doesn't 'particularly want to be a Democrat']. ''Fox News''. Retrieved July 18, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Blake, Andrew (July 18, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/18/george-soros-obama-was-my-greatest-disappointment/ George Soros: Obama was 'my greatest disappointment']. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved July 18, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Opposition to Donald Trump===&lt;br /&gt;
Soros has made numerous statements criticizing U.S. President Donald Trump and his [[conservative]] policies. He also increased his lobbying spending to record levels during Trump's presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Schoffstall, Joe (January 24, 2018). [https://freebeacon.com/uncategorized/george-soros-spent-record-amount-lobbying-trumps-first-year/ George Soros Spent Record Amount Lobbying During Trump’s First Year]. ''The Washington Free Beacon''. Retrieved July 29, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Schoffstall, Joe (July 28, 2018). [https://freebeacon.com/politics/george-soros-spent-10-37-million-lobbying-during-second-quarter/ George Soros Spent $10.37 Million Lobbying During Second Quarter]. ''The Washington Free Beacon''. Retrieved July 29, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Agee, Chris (July 28, 2018). [https://www.westernjournal.com/george-soros-spent-more-lobbying-than-ever-before/ George Soros Just Spent More on Lobbying Than He Ever Has Before]. ''The Western Journal''. Retrieved July 29, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He reportedly kept [[anti-Trump]] &amp;quot;whistleblower&amp;quot; [[Eric Ciaramella]] on his activities in Ukraine.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klein, Aaron (November 17, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/11/17/emails-open-society-kept-alleged-whistleblower-eric-ciaramella-updated-on-george-soross-personal-ukraine-activities/ Emails: Open Society Kept Alleged ‘Whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella Updated on George Soros’s Personal Ukraine Activities]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved November 18, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Socialist Agenda For America ===&lt;br /&gt;
Even though the free market has made Soros a multi-billionaire, he blames capitalism for the world's problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote| The entire edifice of global financial markets has been erected on the false premise that markets can be left to their own devices, we must find a new paradigm and rebuild from the ground up. I decided to sponsor INET to facilitate the process.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a Der Spiegel interview in 2008, Soros advocates European-style socialism for America, &amp;quot;is exactly what we need now. I am against market fundamentalism. I think this propaganda that government involvement is always bad has been very successful -- but also very harmful to our society.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros's answer to America's problems involves more regulation and more government intervention in the marketplace. Soros pours billions of dollars into the following anti-USA causes;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=589 GUIDE TO THE GEORGE SOROS NETWORK, Discover The Networks]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Promoting the view that America is institutionally an oppressive nation&lt;br /&gt;
*Promoting the election of leftist political candidates throughout the United States&lt;br /&gt;
*Opposing virtually all post-9/11 national security measures enacted by U.S. government, particularly the Patriot Act&lt;br /&gt;
*Depicting American military actions as unjust, unwarranted, and immoral&lt;br /&gt;
*Promoting open borders, mass immigration, and a watering down of current immigration laws&lt;br /&gt;
*Promoting a dramatic expansion of social welfare programs funded by ever-escalating taxes&lt;br /&gt;
*Promoting social welfare benefits and amnesty for illegal aliens&lt;br /&gt;
*Defending suspected anti-American terrorists and their abetters&lt;br /&gt;
*Financing the recruitment and training of future activist leaders of the political Left&lt;br /&gt;
*Advocating America's unilateral disarmament and/or a steep reduction in its military spending&lt;br /&gt;
*Opposing the death penalty in all circumstances&lt;br /&gt;
*Promoting socialized medicine in the United States&lt;br /&gt;
*Promoting the tenets of radical environmentalism, whose ultimate goal, as writer Michael Berliner has explained, is “not clean air and clean water, [but] rather ... the demolition of technological/industrial civilization”&lt;br /&gt;
*Bringing American foreign policy under the control of the United Nations&lt;br /&gt;
*Promoting racial and ethnic preferences in academia and the business world alike&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indirectly, Soros is one of the main funders of the socialist [[Green New Deal]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klein, Aaron (February 19, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/19/whos-behind-the-green-new-deal-big-money-backs-ocasio-cortez-socialist-dream-project/ Who’s Behind the Green New Deal? Big Money Backs Ocasio-Cortez Socialist Dream Project]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved February 19, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Globalism and the War on Sovereignty===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|War on Sovereignty}}&lt;br /&gt;
Soros is known for funding organizations opposed to [[sovereignty]], [[Border|national borders]], and supportive of a [[one-world government]]. He wrote in 1998 that &amp;quot;the sovereignty of states must be subordinated to international law and international institutions,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ClintonEmbracesSoros&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Scarborough, Rowan (October 20, 2016). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/20/hillary-clinton-embraces-george-soros-radical-visi/ Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros’ ‘radical’ vision of open-border world]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved December 11, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and he wrote in 2009 that &amp;quot;sovereignty is an anachronistic concept originating in bygone times.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Soros, George (October 28, 2009). [https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/28/the-peoples-sovereignty/ The People’s Sovereignty]. ''Foreign Policy''. Retrieved December 11, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In a statement in 2015 criticizing Hungarian Prime Minister [[Viktor Orbán]], Soros stated that &amp;quot;his plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle,&amp;quot; while &amp;quot;our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Hallett, Nick (November 2, 2015). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/02/soros-admits-involvement-in-migrant-crisis-national-borders-are-the-obstacle/ Soros Admits Involvement In Migrant Crisis: ‘National Borders Are The Obstacle’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 11, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Chumley, Cheryl (November 4, 2015). [https://www.wnd.com/2015/11/george-soros-admits-hes-toppling-eu-borders/ George Soros admits he's toppling EU borders]. ''WND''. Retrieved June 14, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Gergely, Andras (October 30, 2015). [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-10-30/orban-accuses-soros-of-stoking-refugee-wave-to-weaken-europe Orban Accuses Soros of Stoking Refugee Wave to Weaken Europe]. ''Bloomberg''. Retrieved June 14, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DamningEnough&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; He has also funded organizations, such as the Columbia Global Policy Initiative, Global Policy Institute, International Migration Institute, and the [[Open Society Foundations]], that promote mass migration and undermine – and eventually seek to completely do away with – sovereignty and national borders.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ClintonEmbracesSoros&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Jasper, William F. (August 19, 2016). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/23893-hacked-docs-expose-soros-obama-un-refugee-invasion-network Hacked Docs Expose Soros-Obama-UN Refugee Invasion Network]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 11, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Tomlinson, Chris (August 20, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/08/20/soros-leaks-un-chief-behind-scenes-advocate/ Soros Leaks Refer To UN Chief As ‘Elite, Behind The Scenes’ Soros Advocate]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 11, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.rt.com/news/410652-george-soros-one-world-government/ ‘George Soros seeks a one world government to serve oligarchs, not the people’ – US State Senator]. ''RT''. November 22, 2017. Retrieved December 11, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Chaos&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Glick, Caroline (August 26, 2016). [https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/08/26/soross_campaign_of_global_chaos_131622.html Soros's Campaign of Global Chaos]. ''RealClearPolitics''. Retrieved December 11, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros has publicly pledged to &amp;quot;fight back&amp;quot; against what he describes as the &amp;quot;dominant ideology&amp;quot; of [[nationalism]], in order to strengthen [[globalist]] institutions such as the [[European Union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Friedman, Victoria (January 15, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/01/15/soros-dominant-ideology-nationalism-eu-verge-breakdown/ Soros Pledges Renewed Fight Against ‘Dominant Ideology’ of Nationalism, Says EU ‘on Verge of Breakdown’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 15, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was reported in 2018 that he funded an app to help illegal migrants escape law enforcement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Church, Nate (May 4, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/05/04/george-soros-funding-smartphone-app-help-illegal-immigrants-avoid-law-enforcement/ George Soros Funding Smartphone App to Help Illegal Immigrants Avoid Law Enforcement]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Baker, Rebekah (May 5, 2018). [https://www.westernjournal.com/george-soros-funding-app-that-helps-illegal-immigrants-avoid-arrest/ George Soros Funding App that Helps Illegal Immigrants Avoid Arrest]. ''Western Journal''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Fernandez, Henry (May 3, 2018). [https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/george-soros-funded-app-helps-illegal-immigrants-avoid-arrest George Soros-funded app helps illegal immigrants avoid arrest]. ''Fox Business''. Retrieved May 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soros's opposition to national sovereignty has brought himself into conflict with conservatives and other nationalists such as [[Hungary]]'s [[Viktor Orbán]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pocius, Skomantas (June 4, 2018). [https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/orban-soros-and-the-unbridgeable-conflict-over-hungarian-sovereignty/ Orbán, Soros, and the Unbridgeable Conflict Over Hungarian Sovereignty]. ''The American Conservative''. Retrieved June 6, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soros has called for sanctions on Hungary because of its refusal to cave to the EU's [[open borders]] agenda.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Newman, Alex (July 3, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/29448-soros-demands-eu-sanctions-on-hungary-for-resisting-migration Soros Demands EU Sanctions on Hungary For Resisting Migration]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 3, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Orbán was able to force Soros's Open Society Foundations to leave Hungary and move to [[Berlin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hale, Virginia (October 5, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/10/05/hungary-open-society-foundations-berlin/ Kicked Out of Hungary, Soros’s Open Society Foundations Re-Opens in Berlin]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved October 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Organizations funded by Soros advocated for open borders leading up to the European Parliament elections.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hale, Virginia (May 23, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/05/23/soros-eu-taxpayer-funded-open-borders/ Soros, EU Taxpayer-Funded NGOs Lobby Brussels for Total Open Borders]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 23, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite opposing border walls, Soros lives behind the safety of a wall surrounding his house in the Hamptons.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, Benny (January 13, 2019). [https://dailycaller.com/2019/01/13/walls-across-america-george-soros/ Walls Across America: George Soros' Great Wall]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved January 15, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He strongly supports the socialist and globalist [[European Union]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kokx, Stephen (February 15, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/george-soros-panics-begs-europeans-to-prevent-eu-from-dissolving-like-commu George Soros panics, begs Europeans to prevent EU from dissolving like Communist Russia]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved February 15, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros has a strong influence in the [[European Parliament]], in which the Open Society European Policy Institute counted 226 &amp;quot;reliable allies&amp;quot; between 2014 and 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Blinova, Ekaterina (May 29, 2019). [https://sputniknews.com/analysis/201905291075432048-salvini-european-parliament/ Eurocrats, Soros' Allies to Try to Thwart Salvini's New Right-Wing Bloc – Journo]. ''Sputnik''. Retrieved May 29, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Anti-Semitism of Soros ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:G. Soros.jpg|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Left-wing Anti-Semitism}}&lt;br /&gt;
Soros is an [[atheist]] in opposition to religiously orthodox Jews, and he has perpetrated anti-Semitism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (October 29, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2018/10/29/pollak-george-soros-is-a-victim-of-antisemitism-and-also-a-perpetrator/ Pollak: George Soros Is a Victim of Antisemitism, and Also a Perpetrator]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved October 29, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to Connie Bruck of The New Yorker, George Soros told her that &amp;quot;I don't deny the Jews their right to a national existence — but I don't want to be part of it.&amp;quot;  According to [[Joshua Muravchik]], Soros has publicly likened Israel to the Nazis.  According to the Jerusalem Post, &amp;quot;Soros and his wealthy Jewish American friends have now decided to aim their fire directly at Israel . . . to form a political lobby that will weaken the influence of the pro-Israel lobby [[AIPAC]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros has donated to organizations that called for [[Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions]] against Israel.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DamningEnough&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klein, Aaron (January 21, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2019/01/21/target-israel-george-soros-funded-groups-leading-bds-war-on-jewish-state/ Target Israel: George Soros-Funded Groups Leading BDS War on Jewish State]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 21, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His Open Society Foundations contributed to groups which purpose is to delegitimize the Israeli government such as the &amp;quot;human rights organization&amp;quot; [[B’Tselem]] and the anti-occupation group Breaking the Silence.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/17/opinion/george-soros-israel-hungary.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Since 2001 Soros donated $2,688,560 to the self-described &amp;quot;human rights organization&amp;quot; Adalah, which has accused Israel of war crimes in international arenas. Since 2003 the OFS transferred $1,083,000 to the I'lam Media Center which has accused Israel of ethnic cleansing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.israelhayom.com/2017/07/20/hack-exposes-billionaire-soros-support-of-anti-israel-agenda/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros has blamed Europe's anti-Semitism as a result of Jews,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;JewsIsraelCause&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; along with the policies created by the United States and Israel, saying &amp;quot;There is a resurgence of anti-Semitism in Europe. The policies of the [[Bush administration]] and the [[Ariel Sharon|Sharon administration]] contribute to that.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fpp&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/03/11/JTA071103.html |title=In rare Jewish appearance, George Soros says Jews and Israel cause anti-Semitism |accessdate=2007-10-05}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;judaism&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://judaism.about.com/library/2_americanjewry/bl_soros.htm |title=George Soros Blames Jews for Anti-Semitism |accessdate=2007-10-05}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Abe Foxman, former national director of the [[Anti-Defamation League]], called Soros's comments &amp;quot;absolutely obscene&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;judaism&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Soros has called for a &amp;quot;[[regime change]]&amp;quot; in the United States has spoken of funding projects in Palestine.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;fpp&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; He is often criticized by the Jewish community for failing to give funding to their causes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-/module/displaystory/story_id/1245/edition_id/12/format/html/displaystory.html |title=28th richest man in America, George Soros, needs a Jewish connection |accessdate=2007-10-05}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Israel]]'s foreign ministry criticized Soros for funding groups &amp;quot;that defame the Jewish state and seek to deny it the right to defend itself.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2017/07/10/israel-george-soros-behind-groups-defaming-jewish-state/ Israel: George Soros Behind Groups That Defame Jewish State]. ''Breitbart News''. July 10, 2017. Retrieved July 11, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
George Soros is a Hungarian-born Jew who, after collaborating with deportations of Jews to [[Auschwitz]], escaped to [[London]]. He stated in an interview many years later that he did not feel guilty about it,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DamningEnough&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Geraghty, Jim (November 1, 2018). [https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/the-truth-about-george-soros-is-damning-enough/ The Truth about George Soros Is Damning Enough]. ''National Review''. Retrieved November 1, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and he has admitted that his mother was an anti-Semite.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Clabough, Raven (November 11, 2010). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/3501-george-soros-the-puppetmaster George Soros: The Puppetmaster]. ''The New American''. Retrieved October 29, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to his father, Soros helped the Germans confiscate the property of Jews, with the implication that he did so willingly.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DamningEnough&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Soros in a ''60 Minutes'' interview claimed he was a &amp;quot;spectator,&amp;quot; however the 1962 [[Eichmann]] trial established &amp;quot;unauthorized persons&amp;quot; were not allowed near Jewish property seized by [[Third Reich]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBGGHrz-Kzc&amp;amp;feature=youtu.be Eichmann Trial Session no. 90 / 10/07/1961 (19:00 - 36:00 minutes)].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt; A. The property of the Jewish communities which were liquidated, was sequestered in accordance with the regulation, in accordance with some regulation, but not through my doing.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Q. Did you take over the property of the Jewish communites, &amp;quot;yes&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;no&amp;quot;?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A. No, I did not take it over.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Q. Then take up your handwritten text again. Look at page 749. &amp;quot;For the seizure and administration of Jewish property, mainly, I think, of real estate, so-called Offices for Administration and Utilization were created.&amp;quot; You created that, didn't you?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A. This was created by an order of the Reich Commissioner for the Reunification of Austria and Germany, and not by me. Neither was I the head of the Central Office; the head was the Inspector of the Security Police and the Security Service. I was merely entrusted with management.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Q. And these administration offices - will you stand up and read what it says further on, at the end of this paragraph. Read it out loud.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A. &amp;quot;The Reichsfuehrer-SS and the German Police...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Q. &amp;quot;In order to deprive these administration offices of any possible private nature...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A. &amp;quot;In order to deprive these administration offices of any possible private nature, I initiated action to have them elevated to a legal entity under public law.&amp;quot; Yes, that is correct.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Q. You did that, didn't you?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A. Yes, I did, because property was thereby better protected against seizure by unauthorized persons, because a public corporation under public law is always better than any body set up somehow by decree which did not receive that status.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Q. In any event, the Jews never saw a penny of their money again. Isn't that right?&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A. That is regrettable, but not my fault.&amp;quot; [https://web.archive.org/web/20001001092611/http://nizkor.org/hweb/people/e/eichmann-adolf/transcripts/Sessions/Session-090-03.html]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt; Eichamnn's entire defense was claiming responsibility for separating Jews from the general population, confiscating property, and loading the deportees on trains. Eichmann denied responsibility for what happened when the train reached its destination. The [[Gestapo]] did not allow &amp;quot;spectators&amp;quot; to its activities.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By Soros own admission he shed his Jewish identity. Decades later, after Hillary Clinton's defeat in 2016, Soros reversed his anti-Christian and anti-Jewish [[bigotry]], claiming &amp;quot;victim status&amp;quot; as a supposed &amp;quot;holocaust survivor.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Suppression of dissent===&lt;br /&gt;
Soros' and his left-wing allies regularly deflect any criticism of Soros, no matter how well-founded, by demonizing everyone who criticizes Soros is somehow &amp;quot;anti-Semitic.&amp;quot; Thus, the media has given Soros immunity from criticism despite those criticisms having nothing to do with his ethnicity, but rather for his funding of left-wing causes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Examples of liberals and the mainstream media alleging any criticism of Soros is &amp;quot;anti-Semitic&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
*https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/oct/24/george-soros-antisemitism-bomb-attacks&lt;br /&gt;
*https://www.thedailybeast.com/gop-ad-taps-anti-semitism-to-portray-george-soros-as-puppet-master&lt;br /&gt;
*https://www.thenation.com/article/the-mainstreaming-of-anti-semitism-in-the-us/&lt;br /&gt;
*https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-viktor-orbans-war-on-george-soros-and-hungarys-jews/&lt;br /&gt;
*https://www.businessinsider.com/roy-moore-anti-semitism-george-soros-jews-hell-2017-12&lt;br /&gt;
*https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/tim-kaine-accuses-gop-of-straight-flat-out-anti-semitism-over-george-soros&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As an example of this, [[Fox Business]] banned a [[Judicial Watch]] board member simply because he pointed out Soros' left-wing influence in the U.S. State Department.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Anapol, Avery (October 28, 2018). [https://thehill.com/homenews/media/413542-fox-business-exec-condemns-rhetoric-of-guest-who-blamed-migrant-caravan-on Fox Business drops guest who blamed migrant caravan on 'Soros-occupied State Department']. ''The Hill''. Retrieved October 28, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Chasmar, Jessica (October 29, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/29/fox-business-condemns-chris-farrells-soros-occupie/ Fox Business condemns guest's 'Soros-occupied' remark]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved October 29, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Snider, Mike (October 29, 2018). [https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/nation-now/2018/10/29/lou-dobbs-controversy-fox-bans-george-soros-conspiracy-theory-guest/1804634002/ Fox bans Lou Dobbs' guest over George Soros conspiracy theory]. ''USA Today''. Retrieved October 29, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
The [[liberal media]] falsely depicted this as &amp;quot;anti-Semitism:&lt;br /&gt;
*https://twitter.com/DavidCornDC/status/1056540982395711490&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, Campbell Soup announced it would accelerate the departure of one of its lobbyists because that lobbyist alleged that Soros was funding a [[2018 Migrant caravan|migrant caravan]] to the U.S.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Keller, Megan (October 28, 2018). [https://thehill.com/homenews/news/413546-campbell-soup-to-accelerate-departure-of-executive-who-tweeted-about-soros Campbell Soup to ‘accelerate’ departure of executive who tweeted about Soros funding caravan]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved October 28, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Also in 2018, the U.S. Agency for Global Media, a government agency, announced it would discipline its employees for airing a report on Soros that included criticism from conservatives of him.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lee, Matthew; Lugo, Luis Alonso (October 29, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/29/george-soros-report-prompts-discipline-us-agency-g/ U.S. government broadcaster to punish employees over George Soros report]. ''The Washington Times'' (from the ''Associated Press''). Retrieved October 29, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== 2008 Financial Crisis ==&lt;br /&gt;
While the rest of the world financial markets were losing billions of dollars, Soros made billions of dollars for which he said, [he's] &amp;quot;having a very good crisis.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/03/26/having-good-crisis-will-soros-be-attacked-his-profits 'I'm Having A Good Crisis': Will Soros Be Attacked For HIS Profits?], [[Newsbusters]], March 26, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some people speculate that Soros was responsible for the crisis by removing his large sums of money from institutions and betting against currency valuations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In response to the 2008 financial crisis, the [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]] was enacted.  Through several direct and indirect non-profit channels, George Soros and his organizations were big beneficiaries of the Obama stimulus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sorosfiles.com/soros/2012/04/obama-stimulus-dollars-funded-soros-empire.html Obama Stimulus Dollars Funded Soros Empire]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Liberal Infrastructure ==&lt;br /&gt;
Soros and his foundations have had a hand in funding noteworthy leftist organizations. Since 1999, Soros's [[Open Society Foundations|Open Society Institute]] (OSI) has given grants to [[Center for American Progress]] ($1.8 million), Center on Budget and Policy Priorities ($3.7 million), Economic Policy Institute ($3 million), Institute for America's Future ($965,000), the Center for Policy Alternatives ($1.4 million), and the [[Tides Foundation]] ($20 million).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ASpectator&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other leftist groups Soros funds includes the following;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Discover&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy, the [[Tides Foundation|Tides Center]]; the [[National Organization for Women]]; Feminist Majority; the [[American Civil Liberties Union]]; [[People for the American Way]]; Alliance for Justice; [[NARAL]] Pro-Choice America; America Coming Together; Campaign for America's Future; [[Amnesty International]]; the Sentencing Project; the Center for Community Change; the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Legal Defense and Educational Fund; [[Human Rights Watch]]; the Prison Moratorium Project; the [[Malcolm X]] Grassroots Movement; the [[National Lawyers Guild]]; the [[Center for Constitutional Rights]]; the Coalition for an International Criminal Court; The American Prospect; [[MoveOn.org]]; [[Planned Parenthood]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=George Soros Funds New Planned Parenthood Group to Turn Out Pro-Abortion Vote |author=Micaiah Bilger |publisher=LifeNews.com |date=11 May 2018 |url=https://www.lifenews.com/2018/05/11/george-soros-funds-new-planned-parenthood-group-to-turn-out-pro-abortion-vote/ |accessdate=9 Jul 2018 |quote=American billionaire George Soros has been keeping the abortion industry afloat for years with hundreds of millions of dollars in donations. Soros reportedly has given $246 million to pro-abortion groups, including Planned Parenthood, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Women’s March. His children also give major donations to the abortion industry. }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=George Soros and family are top donors to Planned Parenthood Votes |author=Carole Novielli |publisher=Live Action News |date=11 Oct 2016 |url=https://www.liveaction.org/news/george-soros-and-family-top-donors-planned-parenthood-votes/ |accessdate=9 Jul 2018 |quote=So far this year, Planned Parenthood’s political action organization, Planned Parenthood Votes, has received $10,119,855 in individual donations for 2016 political campaigning, according to a summary published by Open Secrets.  A search conducted on October 11, 2016, revealed that billionaire George Soros and his family members were among Planned Parenthood’s top political donors:&lt;br /&gt;
• George Soros gave Planned Parenthood Votes $1,500,000&lt;br /&gt;
• Jennifer Allan Soros gave Planned Parenthood Votes $1,000,000&lt;br /&gt;
• Jonathan Soros gave Planned Parenthood Votes $1,000,000 as well as $250,000 in 2012&lt;br /&gt;
• Andrea Soros Colombel gave Planned Parenthood Votes $ 250,000 George Soros, whose net worth is $24.9 billion, promised to spend $13 million to support Democrats in the 2016 presidential race. He is among Planned Parenthood’s biggest donors. Soros listed his place of employment as the Soros Fund Management when he donated $1,500,000 in 2016 to Planned Parenthood Votes. }}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;; the Nation Institute; the Brennan Center for Justice; the Ms. Foundation for Women; the National Security Archive Fund; the Pacifica Foundation; Physicians for Human Rights; the Proteus Fund; the Public Citizen Foundation; the Urban Institute; the [[American Friends Service Committee]]; Catholics for a Free Choice; Human Rights First; the Independent Media Institute; MADRE; the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund; the Immigrant Legal Resource Center; the National Immigration Law Center; the National Immigration Forum; the National Council of [[La Raza]]; the American Immigration Law Foundation; the Lynne Stewart Defense Committee; and the Peace and Security Funders Group.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soros helped establish and fund the [[Tides Foundation]] which assists liberal charities.  The Tides Foundation is currently trying to establish a $100 million endowment fund for Wikipedia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_releases/Wikipedia_celebrates_15_years_of_free_knowledge|title=Press releases/Wikipedia celebrates 15 years of free knowledge|work=Press Release|date=&lt;br /&gt;
January 14, 2016 |accessdate=March 20, 2016}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Criticism ==&lt;br /&gt;
Billionaire George Soros has been criticized by a number of different commentators on many issues, ranging from his financial support of various controversial organizations, his reported tax evasions and his views on Israel, the United States, and [[anti-Semitism]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hungarian Prime Minister [[Viktor Orbán]] has been a strong critic or Soros.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Williams, Thomas D. (April 27, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/04/27/george-soros-has-ruined-the-lives-of-millions-of-europeans-says-hungarian-prime-minister/ George Soros ‘Has Ruined the Lives of Millions of Europeans’ Says Hungarian Prime Minister]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 27, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2018, HOPE not Hate, a British organization supported by Soros, came under criticism for advocating for banning certain &amp;quot;Nazi&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;far-right&amp;quot; books.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Tomlinson, Chris (March 21, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/03/21/soros-hope-not-hate-massive-backlash-book-ban-list/ Soros’s HOPE Not Hate Sees Massive Backlash over Book Ban List]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved March 21, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Criticism of funding ===&lt;br /&gt;
George Soros has been accused of helping to fund 'smear sites' like [[Moveon.org]] and [[Media Matters]], according to [[Bill O'Reilly]], [[National Review]], and other groups.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;soros2&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;soros1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,268043,00.html |title=Buying Political Power |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soros has donated millions to [[Moveon.org]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;soros1&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; That foundation has donated money to [[Media Matters for America]], a group highly critical of O'Reilly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
O'Reilly has claimed that Soros's goal &amp;quot;is to buy a presidential election... find and fund a candidate who will tacitly do what he or she is told to do.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;soros1&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Financing Halliburton ===&lt;br /&gt;
Foreign Policy magazine editor Mike Boyer reports that SEC documents reveal that George Soros's Soros Fund Management LLC bought 1.9 million shares of [[Halliburton]] stock in the fourth quarter of 2006.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/node/3776 |title=Soros buys Halliburton |accessdate=2007-09-30}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Boyer wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|&lt;br /&gt;
Normally, I'm willing to overlook the hypocrisy of the liberal elite. If Al Gore and his Hollywood cronies want to fly around on gas-guzzling, atmosphere-polluting private jets while railing against global climate change, I'm willing to overlook it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the latest move by globe trotting, hyper-liberal billionaire George Soros borders on being too much.... Soros, of course, is the dean of Democratic money giving. And Halliburton, of course, is the company that embodies everything the Democrats see as evil. Dick Cheney is its former chief, for goodness' sake.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would be of even greater significance had Soros not given up day-to-day management of the fund.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Criticism of 'tax evading' and finances ===&lt;br /&gt;
George Soros has heavily been criticized for avoiding to pay taxes in the United States.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;soros1&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Soros moved his headquarters to the tax free  Caribbean country of Curaçao, which is outside of the supervision of the United States Government. The Netherlands Antilles has repeatedly been cited by the Task Force on Money Laundering of the [[Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development|Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development]] (OECD) as one of the world's most important centers for laundering illegal proceeds of the Latin American cocaine and other drug traffic. It is a possession of the Netherlands.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;taxes&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.freedomdomain.com/soros01.html |title=George Soros and the Rothschilds Connection  |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;jewishreview&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1203/mason_soros.php3 |title=The sorry tale of George Soros |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;questions&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{Cite web|url=http://www.questionsquestions.net/docs04/engdahl-soros.html |title=The Secret Financial Network Behind &amp;quot;Wizard&amp;quot; George Soros |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/6/23/35240603.pdf |title=OECD Investment Policy Reviews, Netherland Antilles |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former [[Speaker of the House]] for the Republican Party [[Dennis Hastert]] stated that Soros money &amp;quot;could be drug money&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;we don't know where it comes from&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://slate.com/id/2106077/ |title=Dennis Hastert on Dope |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soros accused Hastert of trying to smear him and demanded an apology.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.pekingduck.org/archives/001691.php |title=George Soros demands apology from Dennis Hastert |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Support for internet censorship===&lt;br /&gt;
It was reported in January 2017 that George Soros funded an effort by Clinton associate David Brock to fight &amp;quot;fake news&amp;quot; – aka. conservative media sources, effectively advancing internet [[censorship]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Newman, Alex (August 28, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/29902-amid-google-scandal-soros-backed-plan-to-censor-web-draws-fire Amid Google Scandal, Soros-backed Plan to Censor Web Draws Fire]. ''The New American''. Retrieved August 28, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bandler, Aaron (August 7, 2017). [https://www.dailywire.com/news/19445/11-most-incredible-things-media-matters-uncovered-aaron-bandler 11 Of The Most Incredible Things From David Brock's Uncovered Playbook]. ''The Daily Wire''. Retrieved August 28, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Support for illegal drugs ===&lt;br /&gt;
George Soros has donated millions of dollars towards organizations advocating the [[Illegal drug|legalization of drugs]] in the United States and has been called the &amp;quot;Daddy Warbucks of drug legalization&amp;quot; by Joseph Califano Jr. of Columbia University's National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.russbaker.com/The Nation - George Soro's Long Strange Trip.htm |title=George Soros's Long Strange Trip |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He calls the legalization a &amp;quot;harms reduction&amp;quot; and criminal activity associated with the use of drugs will supposedly be reduced if the US government takes over the trading of drugs and provides drugs and drug paraphernalia to addicts.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;acc&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.aim.org/special_report/A2089_0_8_0_C/ |title=The Hidden Soros Agenda: Drugs, Money, the Media, and Political Power  |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soros has contributed to the passing of thirteen drug legalization laws in nine different states,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;states&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.nationalfamilies.org/guide/gsoros.html |title=George Soros - Drug Legalization |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; including the legalization of marijuana for medical purposes in California and Arizona.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite news |first = Judith |last= Miller |title=With Big Money and Brash Ideas, A Billionaire Redefines Charity |url=http://www.druglibrary.org/olsen/dpf/soros.html |date=1996-12-17 |accessdate=2007-10-05}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1998, Soros was a signatory of a letter addressed to the United Nations and Kofi Annan. He stated that &amp;quot;the global war on drugs is now causing more harm than drug abuse itself.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Discover&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=977 George Soros, Discover The Networks]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Support for soft-on-crime candidates===&lt;br /&gt;
It was reported in 2018 that Soros donated millions of dollars into local district attorney campaigns across the U.S. in order to fund candidates opposed to the death penalty, favoring lenient punishment for crimes, and critical of law enforcement.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*DeBolt, David (May 28, 2018). [https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/05/28/liberal-billionaire-george-soros-spending-big-money-in-local-district-attorney-races/ Liberal billionaire George Soros spending big money in local district attorney races]. ''The Mercury News''. Retrieved May 29, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Pollak, Joel B. (May 29, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/05/29/george-soros-spending-heavily-to-defeat-law-and-order-da-candidates/ George Soros Spending Heavily to Defeat Law-and-Order DA Candidates]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 29, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Pollak, Joel B. (June 6, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/california/2018/06/06/california-primary-george-soros-comes-up-empty-in-d-a-races/ California Primary: George Soros Comes up Empty in D.A. Races]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 6, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Valerie (November 14, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/nov/14/george-soros-pushes-remake-criminal-justice-system/ George Soros notches more leftist DAs in push to remake criminal-justice system]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 14, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Jasper, William F. (November 14, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/34032-san-francisco-s-red-diaper-baby-da-it-s-ok-to-pee-and-poop-on-street San Francisco’s Red Diaper Baby DA: It’s OK to Publicly Urinate on the Street]. ''The New American''. Retrieved November 14, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Support for terrorists ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Linda Evans]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://foia.fbi.gov/filelink.html?file=/weather/weath2b.pdf FBI fil Weather Underground Organization (Weatherman)], Part 2b pp. 22-25 pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a member of the [[Weather Underground]] and [[John Brown Anti-Klan Committee]] terrorist organizations which bombed the [[U.S. Capitol]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nobsopus.blogspot.com/search?q=Tonight+we+bombed+the+U.+S.+Capitol+building Armed Resistance Unit Bombs US Capitol], ''Death to the Klan'', Winter, 1984, No.3. Retrieved from Press Reports, September 13, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; received a grant for her All of Us or None of Us program&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://sorosfiles.com/soros/2011/10/soros-funded-media-and-the-glorification-of-the-weather-underground.html Soros-funded Media and the Glorification of the Weather Underground]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; after being pardoned by [[President William Jefferson Clinton]] and released from prison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2002, Soros's [[Open Society Foundations|Open Society Institute]] gave $20,000 to the Defense Committee of lawyer Lynne Stewart who defended terrorists in court and was sentenced to 28 months in prison for &amp;quot;providing material support for a terrorist conspiracy&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200502170843.asp |title=Soros Funded Stewarts Defense |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2006/10/16/terrorist-supporting-lawyer-lynne-stewart-gets-slap-on-the-wrist/ |title=Terrorist Supporting Lawyer, Lynne Stewart, Gets Slap On The Wrist |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_4_57/ai_n13487687 |title=A New York jury found Lynne Stewart guilty on all of the counts against her |accessdate=2007-10-04}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Support for totalitarian governments===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2004, Soros stated that rather than countries such as China, Russia, North Korea, or Iran, &amp;quot;the main obstacle to a stable and just world is the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DamningEnough&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; He also praised China's totalitarian government, claiming it is &amp;quot;better functioning...than the United States.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;DamningEnough&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2018 Soros was named the ''Financial Times''' Person or Thing of the Year. He learned of the liberal &amp;quot;honor&amp;quot; while in Marakesh, attending the signing of the [[UN Migrant Treaty]] aimed at destroying all national borders and sovereignty. While celebrating his achievements, two female tourists, one from Denmark and one from Norway, were beheaded in Morocco by moderate rebels.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://gellerreport.com/2018/12/female-tourists-beheaded-2.html/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soros visited [[South Africa]] first, which had just  implemented [[Nazi]]-style race-based seizure of property directed against its white minority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/africa/item/30878-your-time-is-up-white-people-south-africa-sets-date-for-white-farmers-land-grab-law &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soros was in the forefront of the anti-[[Apartheid]] movement which brought the ruling [[Socialist]] regime to power.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.ft.com/soros&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Support for the homosexual agenda ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Homosexual agenda}}&lt;br /&gt;
In the United States, Soros promoted the Gay Straight Alliance, which is responsible for the &amp;quot;toilet war&amp;quot; in [[North Carolina]]. In 2014, he donored about half-million dollars to ''Justice at Stake'', a homosexual organization that is committed to &amp;quot;the defence of [[diversity]],&amp;quot; a code word for [[Homo-fascism#LGBTI Bundling|LGBTI bundling]], in the courts.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=Einwanderung, Abtreibung, Homosex, Klimawandel – die ganze (linke) Agenda des George Soros |publisher=Katholisches, Magazin für Kirche und Kultur |url=http://www.katholisches.info/2016/08/einwanderung-abtreibung-homosex-klimawandel-die-ganze-linke-agenda-des-george-soros/ |quote=LGBT Ein nicht minder großes Betätigungsfeld von Open Society ist der Kampf gegen „Homophobie“, die als neue Form des „Rassismus“ bezeichnet wird. Auch in diesem Fall wurden im Vorfeld der Wahlen zum Europäischen Parlament besonders intensiv Gelder an zahlreiche Homo-Organisationen ausgeschüttet. Die Aktion hieß LGBT Mob-Watch Europe 2014 mit dem Ziel, „die Stimme und die Forderungen der LGBT Community und ihrer Verbündeten für die Europawahlen zu mobilisieren und zu kanalisieren“. Dank der von DC Leaks enthüllten Dokumente wird es in Zukunft nicht mehr möglich sein, die Existenz einer Homo-Lobby zu leugnen. Zu den Nutznießern gehört selbstverständlich Ilga Europe, das Gelder für das Projekt European elections 2014 Cross-communities Mobilization Project for a Universal and Indivisible EU Equality Agenda erhielt. Das Hauptaugenmerk liegt auf den USA, wo Soros die Gay Straight Alliance förderte, die für den „Toiletten-Krieg“ in Nord Carolina verantwortlich ist. Eine halbe Million Dollar flossen 2014 an Justice at Stake, eine Homo-Organisation, die sich für die „Verteidigung der Diversität“ bei Gerichten einsetzt. Denn, so heißt es in einem nun veröffentlichten Dokument, „eine größere Diversität in den Büros der Richter verbessert die Qualität der Justiz für alle Bürger“. Was damit gemeint sein dürfte, kann man anhand der homophilen Urteile verschiedener US-Gerichte erahnen. |language=German}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In [[Hungary]], Soros funds [[Central European University]] that teaches [[Gender ideology|Gender studies]] courses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web |title=Hungary to stop financing gender studies courses: PM aide |date=14 Aug 2018 |publisher=Reuters |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-hungary-government-education/hungary-to-stop-financing-gender-studies-courses-pm-aide-idUSKBN1KZ1M0 |accessdate=24 Oct 2018 |quote=Gender studies courses are taught at the state-run university ELTE and Central European University, which are among the top universities in Hungary. ... CEU is founded by Hungarian-born U.S. financier George Soros.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Countries which have banned Soros ===&lt;br /&gt;
Because of his illegal insurrectionist activities, financial manipulations and funding and support of criminal activity in the numerous countries in which he has interests, Soros and his organizations have been officially banned from six of them under penalty of law.  Those countries are the [[Philippines]], [[Russia]], [[Turkey]], [[Poland]], [[Pakistan]] and his native Hungary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcDZqMgjYM0 George Soros Now BANNED From 6 Nations!!!] at Dr. Steve Turley YouTube channel&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Works==&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Alchemy of Finance'', (1988)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Opening the Soviet System'',  (1990)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Underwriting Democracy: Encouraging Free Enterprise and Democratic Reform Among the Soviets and in Eastern Europe'', (1991)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Soros on Soros: Staying Ahead of the Curve'', (1995)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Crisis of Global Capitalism: Open Society Endangered'', (1998)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Science and the Open Society: The Future of Karl Popper's Philosophy'', (2000)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism'', (2001)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''George Soros on Globalization'', (2002)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Bubble of American Supremacy: Correcting the Misuse of American Power'', (2003)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Age of Fallibility: Consequences of the War on Terror'', (2006)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The New Paradigm for Financial Markets: The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What it Means'', (2008)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Soros Lectures at the Central European University'', (2010)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''Financial Turmoil in Europe and the United States: Essays'', (2012)&lt;br /&gt;
* ''The Tragedy of the European Union: Disintegration or Revival?'', (2014)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Quotes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;quot;I went to England in 1947 and then to the United States in 1956. But I never quite became an American.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;movesmarkets&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See also ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Open Society Foundations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Richard Goldstone]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Michael Moore]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Marc Elias]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Central European University]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Democracy Integrity Project]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Establishment and Zionism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{reflist|3}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://sorosfiles.com/soros/ The Soros Files]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.georgesoros.com/ George Soros' personal site]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.shadowparty.com/ The Shadow Party], David Horowitz's blog and book reporting George Soro's influence over the Democratic Party.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.earstohear.net/soros.html EarsToHear.net]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://online.wsj.com/video/davos-soros-wants-global-bank-regulatory-system/266BE2A0-D7C8-4371-8013-CF96E5EA17BF.html Video: Soros Wants Global Bank Regulatory System, January 27, 2010]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://ninetyninth.reteaparty.com/2010/01/25/obama-funds-george-soros-w-our-taxes/ Obama funds George Soros w/ our taxes.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=977 Discover The Networks, GEORGE SOROS]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://abouthungary.hu/blog/the-gravedigger-of-the-left/ The Gravedigger of the Left], Maria Schmidt&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/riot-act/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Liberalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{communism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Soros, George}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Propagandists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business People]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:American Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheist Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Atheists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Featured articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Economic Vandals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Political Activists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[category:Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Organizations]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Media]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Biden Putsch]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Globalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-Semitism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=1710529</id>
		<title>Barack Hussein Obama</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Barack_Hussein_Obama&amp;diff=1710529"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:38:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Barack Hussein Obama II''', born August 4, 1961, is an [[America|American]] politician and attorney who served as the 44th [[president of the United States]] from 2009 to 2017, and previously as a [[U.S. senator]] from [[Illinois]] from 2005 to 2008 and an [[Illinois]] state senator from 1997 to 2004. He is member of the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]] and the first [[African-Americans|African-American]] president of the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama received a [[Nobel Peace Prize]] in 2009 and generally has an image among many as being a &amp;quot;cool black guy&amp;quot; because of his public appearance and things like legalizing [[same-sex marriage]], but whatever positives he may be thought to have are severely outweighed by his negatives. He was seen as kind of an outsider, a person other than an elderly white man man who rode the anti-war/anti-Bush/anti-Republican wave in 2008 but who had failed miserably to deliver on its hopes, radicalising much of a generation to never trust liberals like him again, and even giving much of the impulse that elected [[Donald Trump]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His negatives include:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*His terrible appointments to office:&lt;br /&gt;
**He filled his cabinet with [[Wall Street]] executives, then supporting their bailout as well as the bailout of big banks and corporations at the expense of the people during the [[2008 financial crisis]]&lt;br /&gt;
**His FDA appointee was literally a [[Monsanto]] executive&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Foreclosure|Foreclosing]] on homeowners instead of bailing them out&lt;br /&gt;
*Cracking down on the [[Occupy Wall Street]] movement&lt;br /&gt;
*Continuing the [[War on Terror]] and the [[War on Drugs]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Persecution of [[whistleblower|whistleblowers]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/16/whistleblowers-double-standard-obama-david-petraeus-chelsea-manning https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/mar/16/whistleblowers-double-standard-obama-david-petraeus-chelsea-manning]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Normalizing and expanding upon the massive [[surveillance state]] developed under [[George Bush]] &lt;br /&gt;
*Neglecting the water crisis in [[Flint, Michigan]] (which is also a majority black city; this being extra bad because many black people thought that Obama would do better for them than non-black presidents)&lt;br /&gt;
*Opening up the [[arctic|Arctic]] for drilling twice, along with issuing a myriad of executive orders for individual pipeline segment construction which complete the entire Alberta tar sands-to-Gulf Coast pipeline. All this in spite of that phony cynical veto of the [[Keystone XL]] segment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.opednews.com/populum/page.php?f=Obama-s-Keystone-XL-Veto-J-by-Joan-Brunwasser-Activism-Environmental_Climate_Environment-Policy_Environment-Ecology-151208-692.html Obama's Keystone XL Pipeline Veto Just Smoke and Mirrors?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Getting everyone's hopes up about prosecuting the Bush administration for [[war crimes under George Bush|war crimes]] and holding Wall Street accountable for the financial crisis, but ended up &amp;quot;turning the page&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
*Oversaw the biggest transfer of wealth to the [[bourgeoisie|capitalist class]] in history{{cn}}&lt;br /&gt;
*Deporting a record number of refugees&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/11/08/immi-n08.html Deporter-in-Chief: The legacy of Obama]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Passing Republican healthcare reform written by the Heritage Foundation&lt;br /&gt;
*Making [[Bush tax cuts|Bush's tax cuts]] permanent after campaigning on returning back to Clinton's tax rates&lt;br /&gt;
*Going out of his way to help kill [[Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign|Bernie's campaign in 2020]] and hand the nomination to [[Joe Biden]], who would prevent people from [[Medicare for All|getting healthcare]], prevent the youth from getting out of debt, ensure the wars and corporate plunder would continue without obstacle, and keep his &amp;quot;legacy&amp;quot; of [[Obamacare]] in place. &lt;br /&gt;
*Developing [[neoliberalism|neoliberal]] trade deals with &amp;quot;[[investment protection clauses]]&amp;quot; which enslaved [[global south]] countries to corporations&lt;br /&gt;
*Developing relations with [[Saudi Arabia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*His &amp;quot;[[Asian Pivot]]&amp;quot;, which planted the seeds for the new [[Cold War]] with [[China]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Crushing what remained of the [[Pink Tide]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Colluding with the right wing in [[Brazil]] to stage [[Operation Car Wash|fraudulent corruption trials]] to that paved the way for a [[Jair Bolsonaro|right-wing rise to power]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Supporting a [[2009 Honduran coup d'état|right wing coup]] in [[Honduras]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Repealing [[habeas corpus]] with his signing of the [[2012 National Defense Authorization Act]], paving the way for such events as the [[George Floyd protests in Portland, Oregon|kidnapping of people by federal officers in Portland in 2020]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Overthrowing the [[Gaddafi]] government in [[Libya]], plunging the country into deep poverty, splitting it into various [[warlord]] and [[Islamism|Islamist]] factions, creating an open [[contemporary slave trade|slave trade]], and causing a [[European migrant crisis|major flood of refugees into Europe]] and other places&lt;br /&gt;
*Expanding the wars in [[Afghanistan]], North-West [[Pakistan]], [[Somalia]], and [[Iraq]] (technically he ended one war with Iraq three years into his term, which he promised to do in six months, but followed it up soon with another new war)&lt;br /&gt;
*Starting wars in [[Syria]] (where he started by [[proxy warfare|funding rebel militants]]), [[Yemen]], and Libya&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2017/01/10/pers-j10.html Obama's legacy of war, repression and inequality]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*Doubling down on [[US sanctions on Venezuela|sanctions on Venezuela]], which exacerbated [[Venezuelan economic crisis|its domestic situation]] and which only plunged Venezuelans deeper towards poverty&lt;br /&gt;
*Continuing and adding sanctions on the [[DPRK]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Supporting regime change in [[Ukraine]] and [[Georgia]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Arming [[Ukrainian fascists]] and other far right-wing groups&lt;br /&gt;
*And various war crimes, such as:&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Drone strikes]] in Yemen, which had a 90% civilian kill rate. This serves to further radicalize the population and thus justify further &amp;quot;counter-terrorism&amp;quot; operations.&lt;br /&gt;
It's bad enough that he did all these things, but he did all this when he had the potential to be FDR and then some. Democrats had a filibuster-proof supermajority in [[US Congress]] for the first two years and all he used it for was getting Romneycare (the heavily watered-down version of Obamacare first proposed) passed. Everyone remembers the congressional supermajority he wasted, but for some reason, we never talk about how Democrats also had a majority in governorship and state legislatures as well, so he could have dictated anything we wanted onto the states from Washington and he did nothing. With the worst financial crisis since the 30s, the material conditions were ripe for some massive Keynesian projects and the people would have supported him. Much of his base are Bernie supporters as well, and Obama had them and many more, and after getting elected he did literally nothing to mobilize the millions of email addresses belonging to devoted grassroots activists who had campaigned for him — in fact, he disbanded this grassroots army. Even for a neoliberal Democrat, he had underperformed — [[Bill Clinton]] at least got a couple things passed through Congress, even if they were minor, and was relatively dovish on foreign policy. Obama couldn't even do that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be fair, he did do a few good things:&lt;br /&gt;
*Signing the [[Iran nuclear deal|nuclear deal with Iran]] which is still blackmail but at least lifted some sanctions&lt;br /&gt;
*Lifting some [[US sanctions on Cuba|sanctions on Cuba]] and met with [[Raoul Castro]]&lt;br /&gt;
*He at least rolled out his stimulus package in response to the [[Great Recession]] instead of the German-enforced-style [[Austerity in the EU|austerity in the EU]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Old Article ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Officeholder&lt;br /&gt;
|name=Barack Hussein Obama II&lt;br /&gt;
|image= Bathroom Barry.png&lt;br /&gt;
|party=[[Democratic Party]]&lt;br /&gt;
|spouse=[[Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama]]; may have had a prior marriage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Corsi, Jerome R. (July 19, 2012). [https://www.wnd.com/2012/07/was-barack-obama-married-in-college/ &amp;quot;Was Barack Obama married in college?&amp;quot;].  WorldNetDaily website.  See [[WND]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|religion=Islamic heritage, said to have converted to Protestantism (the liberal [[United Church of Christ]])&lt;br /&gt;
|offices={{Officeholder/president&lt;br /&gt;
	|country=the United States&lt;br /&gt;
	|number=44th&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 20, 2009 – January 20, 2017&lt;br /&gt;
	|vp=[[Joe Biden]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[George W. Bush]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=n&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Donald Trump]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
	{{Officeholder/senator&lt;br /&gt;
	|state=Illinois&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 3, 2005 – November 16, 2008&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=Peter Fitzgerald&lt;br /&gt;
	|former=y&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=[[Roland Burris]]&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Officeholder/misc&lt;br /&gt;
	|office=Illinois Senate, 13th District&lt;br /&gt;
	|terms=January 8, 1997 – November 4, 2004&lt;br /&gt;
	|preceded=[[Alice Palmer]]&lt;br /&gt;
	|succeeded=Kwame Raoul&lt;br /&gt;
	}}&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Barack Hussein Obama II''' (reportedly born in [[Honolulu, Hawaii]] on August 4, 1961) was the 44th President of the [[United States]]. Elected as America's first &amp;quot;post-racial&amp;quot; president according to mainstream [[fake news]] media, Obama exacerbated racial tensions and left a dismal legacy of a divided&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (July 22, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/22/pollak-barack-obama-wrote-playbook-on-political-division/ Pollak: Barack Obama Wrote the Playbook on Political Division]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 22, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; America along [[Marxist]] class, racial, and &amp;quot;[[gender confusion|gender normative]]&amp;quot; lines.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/05/politics/obama-race-relations-poll/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In his final year in office, Barack Obama illegally meddled in the [[2016 Presidential election]] and attempted to blame the [[Russian]]s for it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/02/10/poll-americans-overwhelmingly-believe-obama-improperly-surveilled-trump-campaign/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In early January 2017, Obama empowered holdovers in his administration to engage in [[sedition]] against the [[Trump transition]] team and newly elected [[Trump administration]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;*https://consortiumnews.com/2017/06/08/soft-coup-on-trump-hiding-in-plain-sight/&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;*[http://archive.is/9KxFz How Obama Ran the Trump Coup], By Robert A. Taft, Feb 17, 2020.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/it-was-exactly-like-sedition-the-obama-trump-transition-was-more-like-sedition/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Barack Obama is the first American president since the transition of [[James Buchanan]] to [[Abraham Lincoln]] who refused a peaceful transfer of power to his elected successor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Joe Biden]], who served for more than four decades in the nation's capital, there were no clean, bright, and articulate Blacks prior to Barack Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/31/biden.obama/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama was educated at [[Harvard Law School]]. In a paper he wrote as a student, he dismissed the American dream as &amp;quot;unfounded optimism&amp;quot; while noting that [[Donald Trump]] is the true idol of the American working class.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama wrote: “[Americans have] a continuing normative commitment to the ideals of individual freedom and mobility, values that extend far beyond the issue of race in the American mind. The depth of this commitment may be summarily dismissed as the unfounded optimism of the average American—I may not be Donald Trump now, but just you wait; if I don’t make it, my children will.” ([http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2017/05/everything-wrong-with-obama-in-two-sentences-with-a-twist.php Everything Wrong with Obama in Two Sentences-with a Twist]&amp;quot;).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama insisted on failed policies, such as [[ObamaCare]], and yet had an arrogant dismissal of his critics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/7/assessing-the-obama-legacy-he-has-failed/ Assessing the Obama legacy], Washington Times, December 7, 2016&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.nationalreview.com/article/442299/barack-obama-progressive-arrogance-leads-backlash Its Arrogance and Condescension Finally Catches Up with the Left], ''National Review'', 2016&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/11/17/president-obamas-biggest-mistake-in-office-thinking-you-can-separate-politics-from-policy/?utm_term=.802d414c3589 President Obama admits his biggest mistake: Arrogance], ''Washington Post'', 2015&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A hard veil of censorship fell during his administration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/Smear-Shady-Political-Operatives-Control/dp/0062468162&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Much of Obama's personal life was shrouded in mystery&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sca-BjFJb_Q&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as a fawning media promoted his agenda of uprooting cultural norms. Critics of Obamacare or [[gay marriage]] typically were smeared as racist. The US Intelligence Community was used to spy on, harass, and intimidate independent journalists and political opponents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://web.archive.org/web/20120925054433/http://wikileaks.org:80/gifiles/docs/1210665_obama-leak-investigations-internal-use-only-pls-do-not.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His presidency was marred by anemic economic growth, rising federal debt, his poor foreign policies and multiple political scandals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2016/02/01/barack_obamas_sad_record_on_economic_growth_101987.html Barack Obama's Sad Record on Economic Growth], Real Clear Markets, February of 2016&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/terence-p-jeffrey/debt-under-obama-9000000000000 Debt Under Obama Up $9,000,000,000,000], CNS News, October 2016&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/18/barack-obama-was-a-foreign-policy-failure/ Barack Obama Was a Foreign-Policy Failure], ForeignPolicy.com&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2016/08/20/obamas-legacy-of-failure-in-the-middle-east/ Obama’s Legacy of Failure in the Middle East], ''Foreign Policy Journal'', 2016&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/02/18-major-scandals-obama-presidency/ 18 Major Scandals in Obama’s ‘Scandal-Free’ Presidency], Breitbart, January of 2017&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://akdart.com/obama101.html Lists of Obama scandals], Andrew K. Dart, http://akdart.com updated January 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama separated families at the border and locked children in cages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-01/fact-check-did-obama-detain-90000-children-border&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Pursuing a foreign policy that undermined American interests, he developed close relations with foreign dictators and shunned democratic movements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (July 12, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2019/07/12/pollak-everything-joe-biden-said-about-donald-trumps-foreign-policy-actually-describes-barack-obamas/ Pollak: Everything Joe Biden Said About Donald Trump’s Foreign Policy Actually Describes Barack Obama’s]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 12, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://twitter.com/HeshmatAlavi/status/1038127594682675200 Heshmat Alavi]. ''Twitter''. September 7, 2018. Retrieved July 16, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He failed to see the backlash against his &amp;quot;transformational&amp;quot; [[Cultural Marxist]] programs and said in February 2016, &amp;quot;I continue to believe that Mr. [[Donald Trump|Trump]] will not be president.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/obama-i-continue-believe-trump-will-not-be-president-n519751 Obama: ‘I Continue to Believe Trump Will Not Be President’], NBC, 2016&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Some people say that Obama is the worst president in history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bedard, Paul (September 7, 2018). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/list-200-reasons-why-obama-is-worst-president-in-history List: 200 reasons why Obama is ‘worst president in history’]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 7, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Barack Obama and abortion|Obama is pro-abortion]].  In fact, he was the most pro-abortion president to date.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.sba-list.org/suzy-b-blog/obama-most-pro-abortion-president-ever &amp;quot;Obama: The most pro-abortion president ever&amp;quot;] (July 12, 2011). The Susan B. Anthony List website/The Suzy B Blog.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama dedicated himself to promoting abortion—rather than reduce them as he promised.  Just to name a few of the administrative actions by which he has done this would include expanding abortions through [[Obamacare]], appointing many pro-abortion judges and officials, moving to strip medical professionals of rights of conscience, and forcing taxpayers to support the pro-abortion movement around the globe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama partnered with [[al Qaeda]] and [[Islamic State]] elements in [[Syria]] for a [[regime change]] war against [[Bashar al Assad]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/19583-moderate-rebels-armed-by-obama-join-al-qaeda-isis&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Assad was a voice for pluralism and inclusion, protecting Christians, Jews, Yazidis and minorities against Obama-backed [[Islamofascist]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2011/09/2011912135213927196.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite framing himself as an advocate for the poor, speaking about income inequality and [[socialism]], Obama is a [[limousine liberal]] as his life after his presidency attests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Biography==&lt;br /&gt;
'''Early controversies'''&lt;br /&gt;
{{TOC right}}&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article : [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Obama claims to have been born in [[Honolulu, Hawaii]] on August 4, 1961, to Stanley Ann Dunham and [[Barack Obama Sr.]]—who had married just six months prior.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc&amp;gt;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23257295/ns/msnbc_tv-documentaries/t/obama-becomes-rising-star-among-democrats/ &amp;quot;Obama becomes rising star among Democrats: Transcript of 'The Candidates: Barack Obama'&amp;quot;] (February 20, 2008).  MSNBC.  Retrieved from NBC News website/MSNBC TV documentaries.  See [[MSNBC]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Some contend that this story is a complete fabrication. [[Obama]] was reportedly given a social security number whose first three digits were assigned at that time to applications coming from zip codes in Connecticut.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Beginning in 1972, all [[Social Security]] numbers were issued from a central office in Baltimore, Maryland.  [https://www.ssa.gov/history/ssn/geocard.html &amp;quot;The SSN numbering scheme&amp;quot;] (March 2001 or bef.)  Social Security: Official Social Security website/History/Social Security Numbers.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama traveled to Pakistan, India, and Indonesia in 1981, however, he never obtained a U.S. passport until 2004 after he was elected to the United States Senate. During the 2008 presidential primaries, a firm headed by [[John Brennan]] hacked into the [[U.S. State Department]]'s visa files and accessed Obama's passport files using whichever Social Security numbers Obama was using at the time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/22/passport.files/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; An FBI informant and whistleblower who worked for Brennan, and was the key witness, was found murdered by a gunshot wound two weeks later.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/apr/19/key-witness-in-passport-fraud-case-fatally-shot/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama later appointed Brennan to a key White House position and as [[CIA]] director in his second term. Brennan was referred for [[criminal]] investigation in 2019 in Obama's [[Spygate]] scandal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Claims that Obama was born in [[Kenya]] have been traced to sources hired by Obama. In 1991, Obama's literary agent, Acton &amp;amp; Dystel, published a promotional booklet stating that Obama was born in Kenya.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Pollak, Joel B. (May 17, 2012). [https://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii &amp;quot;The vetting—exclusive—Obama's literary agent in 1991 booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii'&amp;quot;].  Breitbart website/Big government.  See [[Breitbart.com]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Newby, John (May 17, 2012). [http://www.examiner.com/article/publisher-s-1991-booklet-says-barack-obama-was-born-kenya &amp;quot;Publisher's 1991 booklet says Barack Obama 'was born in Kenya'&amp;quot;].  Examiner.com website/News/Politics/Republican.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The claim that Obama was born in Kenya remained on the agent's website until 2007.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shapiro, Ben (May 17, 2012). [https://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/Obama-pamphlet-in-use-2007 &amp;quot;Obama's lit agency used 'born in Kenya' bio until 2007&amp;quot;].  Breitbart website/Big government.  See [[Breitbart.com]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Internet archives confirm this information.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20070403190001/http://www.dystel.com/clientlist.html &amp;quot;Client list&amp;quot;]. Dystel and Goderic Literary Management website.  Retrieved from April 3, 2007 archive at Internet Archive.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition to the information from literary agents, Michelle Obama stated in a speech that Kenya is Obama's &amp;quot;homeland&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLzJz2A2N1c &amp;quot;Michelle Obama: Kenya is Barack Obama's homeland!&amp;quot;] (Michelle Obama speaking at the 2008 LGBT Democratic Convention delegate luncheon hosted by the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund and the Human Rights Campaign: &amp;quot;The world as it should be&amp;quot;, August 26, 2008) (April 7, 2010). YouTube video, 0:30, posted by Rubystars0000.  See [[Human Rights Campaign]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  At a speech in Kenya shortly after his presidency ended, Obama publicly stated that, &amp;quot;Now, three years ago, I visited Kenya as the first sitting American President to come from Kenya.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L36sGc4Id2I Obama's speech at the launch of Sauti Kuu Foundation in Kogelo] at YouTube (Obama's admission starts at 5:48 of the video)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's birth parents divorced in 1963 when his mother discovered Barack Obama Sr. was already married to a woman living in Kenya.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Birrell, Ian (August 12, 2011).  [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/books/article-2024819/Barack-Obamas-father-Bigamist-drunk-wife-beater.html &amp;quot;Barack Obama's father: Bigamist, drunk and wife-beater, [review of&amp;amp;#93; ''The Other Barack'' by Sally H. Jacobs (Pubic Affairs £20)&amp;quot;]. MailOnline/U.K./Books [U.K.]  This is one of the first misleading statements about Barack Obama when he was introduced to America as Keynote Speaker at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. Advance publicity billed him as the &amp;quot;son of Kenyan economist&amp;quot; when, in fact, Obama Sr. was forced out of the graduate program at Harvard because of his bigamy. He returned to Kenya. Obama at the age 9 once briefly met his father who served in the corrupt Kenyan socialist regime's Department of [[Economic Planning]]. Obama Sr. killed himself in a drunken car accident.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When Obama was 2 years old his mother married Lolo Soetoro, an [[Indonesian]] geologist. At age 6 his mother and adoptive father took him to Jakarta, Indonesia for 4 years while his mother pursued a Ph.D. in Anthropology requiring fieldwork there.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;db mother&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/scclqomayrvxbo/stuv/p2/blogs-and-stories/2011-05-03/a-singular-woman-by-janny-scott-review-by-stacy-schiff/#|publisher=The Daily Beast website|date=May 3, 2011|title=&amp;quot;Dreams of his mother&amp;quot;: Review of ''A Singular Woman'' by Janny Scott|author=Stacy Schiff}} See [[The Daily Beast]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; His mother then abandoned him in Hawaii with his grandparents (Stanley and Madelyn Dunham, who had moved to Hawaii in 1959) &amp;lt;ref name=revealed&amp;gt;Malveaux, Suzanne (August 20, 2008). [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0808/20/se.02.html Transcript of &amp;quot;Barack Obama Revealed&amp;quot;].  CNN website/Transcripts. See CNN&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; so she could return to Indonesia after her divorce. Obama's grandfather arranged for his friend, the noted Communist writer [[Frank Marshall Davis]], to serve as a mentor and role model for an impressionable African-American youth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other siblings of Obama's include his half-sister Maya Soetoro-Ng and 7 other children born to his father by 4 different women.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama&amp;gt;Purdum, Todd (March 2008).  [https://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/03/obama200803 &amp;quot;Raising Obama&amp;quot;]. ''Vanity Fair''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For much of his early life, prior to his transfer to [[Columbia University]], he went by his nickname, &amp;quot;Barry.&amp;quot; In the summer of 1988, before attending [[Harvard Law School]] (he'd just been accepted), he visited Kogelo, Kenya, to learn more about his father's family. When his mother died in 1995, he and his sister Maya scattered her ashes over Hawaii's south shore.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama attended [[Jeremiah Wright|Reverend Jeremiah Wright]]'s Trinity United Church from 1984-1988 during his time as a [[community organizer]] (''See [[Barack Obama#1984-1988.2C Community Organizer|1985-1988, Community Organizer]] section'').  Obama credits Wright with his alleged conversion to Christianity, and had both his daughters, Sasha and Malia, baptized there.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
At age 6, Obama attended schools in Indonesia, the first a Catholic school while he was in kindergarten, and later a public school which taught religion. The school had mostly Muslim students (since most Indonesians are Muslim). In ''[[Dreams From My Father (autobiography)|Dreams from My Father]]'', Obama writes, &amp;quot;In the Muslim school, the teacher wrote to my mother that I had made faces during [[Koran]]ic studies.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama, Barack (1995). ''Dreams from My Father'' (New York: Times Books), p. 14.  Quoted at [http://www.ontheissues.org/Archive/Dreams_From_My_Father_Principles_+_Values.htm &amp;quot;Dreams from my father: On principles &amp;amp; values&amp;quot;].  OnTheIssues website.  See [[Dreams From My Father (autobiography)|''Dreams from my Father'']]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ''Insight'' magazine first reported [[Hillary Clinton]]'s organization had &amp;quot;questions about Obama’s Muslim background: ''Are the American people ready for an elected president who was educated in a [[Madrassa]] as a young boy and has not been forthcoming about his Muslim heritage?&amp;quot;''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schlussel, Debbie (January 19, 2007). [http://www.debbieschlussel.com/2899/hillary-clinton-agrees-with-schlussel-obama-suspicious-deceptive-on-muslim-background/ &amp;quot;Hillary Clinton agrees with Schlussel: Obama suspicious, deceptive on Muslim background&amp;quot;].  Debbie Schlussel website.  See [[Debbie Schlussel]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1971, at age 10, Barack Obama moved to Hawaii, and his grandparents helped him gain entrance to the prestigious Punahou Academy in Honolulu where he began substance abuse and illegal drugs.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, Luke (May 25, 2012).  [https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/25/obama-pot-smoking-details_n_1545904.html &amp;quot;Obama pot-smoking details revealed in David Maraniss book&amp;quot;]. The Huffington Post website.  See [[Huffington Post]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was accepted through a scholarship for disadvantaged minorities while he was in 5th grade.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; At this elite high school with 1,200 students he was just 1 of 3 black students.  Obama failed to make the starting lineup of the school's state champion basketball team his senior year. He wrote a poem for the school's literary magazine, ''Ka Wai Ola''.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1979, he began a 2-year stint at Occidental College college in Los Angeles,&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; and then transferred to Columbia University in New York, which he graduated from in 1983.&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic&amp;gt;Scott, Janny (July 30, 2007). [https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all &amp;quot;In Illinois, Obama proved pragmatic and shrewd&amp;quot;]. ''The New York Times'' website.  See ''[[New York Times]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During this time he published an anti-military tirade embracing Soviet General Secretary [[Leonid Brezhnev]]'s &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama supported [[Communist Party of the Soviet Union]] General Secretary Brezhnev's foreign policy over both Presidents [[Jimmy Carter]] and Ronald Reagan's decision to deploy the MX Missile in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;
* See Pond, Elizabeth (November 24, 1981).  [https://www.csmonitor.com/1981/1124/112439.html &amp;quot;Brezhnev offers Schmidt moratorium on nuclear missiles&amp;quot;].  ''Christian Science Monitor''.  See also ''[[Christian Science Monitor]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
* See also Obama, Barack (March 10, 1983). [https://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/images/nytint/docs/obama-s-1983-college-magazine-article/original.pdf &amp;quot;Breaking the war mentality&amp;quot;].  Columbia [University] ''Sundial''.  Retrieved from archive at ''The New York Times'' website.  See also ''[[The New York Times]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; proposal for a nuclear freeze in the campus newspaper and allegedly spoke at an Anti-Apartheid rally,&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; although several prominent student leaders said they did not remember him there. Professor Michael L. Baron was impressed by Obama and wrote him a recommendation for Harvard Law School.&amp;lt;ref name=differs&amp;gt;Scott, Janny. (October 30, 2007). [https://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all &amp;quot;Obama's account of New York years often differs from what others say&amp;quot;].  ''The New York Times''.  See ''[[The New York Times]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; From 1983 to 1988, Obama took time off from his education to work as a financial analyst and later a community organizer in Chicago. In the winter of 1988, Barack Obama decided to attend Harvard Law School, and left Chicago for Cambridge, Massachusetts. In his 2nd year a power struggle broke out among the dominant white liberals over control of the ''[[Harvard]] Law Review''. Obama was elected its first black president as a compromise candidate largely with help of conservatives following a &amp;quot;marathon voting session&amp;quot; in which he finally won on the 19th ballot.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; This led to national attention and numerous job offers, which Obama passed up, at age 30, to pursue his political career in Chicago.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23257295/ns/msnbc_tv-documentaries/t/obama-becomes-rising-star-among-democrats/ &amp;quot;Obama becomes rising star among Democrats: Transcript of 'The Candidates: Barack Obama'&amp;quot;] (February 20, 2008).  MSNBC.  Retrieved from NBC News website/MSNBC TV documentaries.  See MSNBC.&lt;br /&gt;
*Malveaux, Suzanne (August 20, 2008). [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0808/20/se.02.html Transcript of &amp;quot;Barack Obama Revealed&amp;quot;].  CNN website/Transcripts. See [[CNN]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Obama was attending Harvard Law School, he dreamed of him or his children becoming like [[Donald Trump]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/03/obama-once-dreamed-being-trump-manuscript-shows.html Obama once dreamed of being Trump, manuscript shows]. ''Fox News''. May 3, 2017. Retrieved May 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Personal life'''&lt;br /&gt;
According to ''Rising Star'' by David J. Garrow, in 1986 Obama tried hard to convince Sheila Miyoshii Jager, someone of Dutch and Japanese ancestry, to marry him.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarryBefore&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; She refused his request to marry him due to her age. By 1987, Obama had his sights on becoming U.S. president.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;MarryBefore&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/03/book-barack-obama-asked-woman-to-marry-him-before-meeting-michelle.html Book: Barack Obama asked woman to marry him before meeting Michelle]. ''Fox News''. May 3, 2017. Retrieved May 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Michelle Obama.jpg|thumb|350px|right|Michelle (Robinson) Obama, Barack Obama's domestic partner.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama met his mate known then as Michelle Robinson, while he was an intern and Michelle was on staff at Sidley Austin LLP, a very large corporate law firm.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; Despite company policy prohibiting relations between staff and interns, the two became involved. The two continued a long-distance relationship while he finished law school, and on October 18, 1992,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/03/obama-anniversary-20-years-married_n_1935840.html &amp;quot;Obama anniversary: Barack &amp;amp; Michelle celebrate 20 years of marriage (photos)&amp;quot;] (October 3, 2012).  Huffington Post website.   Huffington Post says it was October 3, 1992.  See [[Huffington Post]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; were joined in a domestic union officiated by Reverend [[Jeremiah Wright]] at Trinity United Church,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://hillbuzz.org/time-to-tell-everyone-you-know-about-jeremiah-wrights-down-low-club-barackobama-presobama-26407&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a church which has supported gay marriage since the 1970s.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; Michelle has not practiced law since 1994 when she failed to renew her law license, allegedly to start a family. Malia, the couple's oldest daughter, was born in 1999, and Natasha (often called Sasha) in 2001.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early employment===&lt;br /&gt;
'''1983–1984: financial analyst and writer'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1983 Obama [[collude]]d with [[Russia]] to further Russian [[foreign policy]] interests against the United States in an essay entitled ''Breaking The War Mentality'' published in Columbia University's weekly magazine, ''The Sun Dial.''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://2012election.procon.org/sourcefiles/obama-article-sun-dial-columbia-breaking-war-mentality.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984 Obama worked as a writer and financial analyst for Business International Corporation to help pay off some of his student loans. Business International Corporation was a small newsletter-publishing and research firm which aided multinational companies in understanding overseas markets. Obama served as a writer/researcher for a company reference service, Financing Foreign Operations, and wrote for their newsletter, ''Business International Money Report''. His supervisor was Cathy Lazere.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Scott, Janny (October 30, 2007). [https://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all &amp;quot;Obama's account of New York years often differs from what others say&amp;quot;].  ''The New York Times''.  See ''[[The New York Times]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Henig, Jess (June 21, 2008). [https://www.factcheck.org/2008/06/obama-polishes-his-resume-2/ &amp;quot;Obama polishes his resume&amp;quot;]. FactCheck.org website.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20091003011550/http://www.analyzethis.net/2005/07/09/barack-obama-embellishes-his-resume/ &amp;quot;Barack Obama embellishes his resume&amp;quot;] (July 9, 2005).  Analyze This website.  Retrieved from October 3, 2009 archive at Internet Archive.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====1984–1988: community organizer====&lt;br /&gt;
In 1984, Obama was hired by the New York Public Interest Research Group, a non-profit organization promoting environmental, consumer, and government reforms. He also was paid just under $10,000 annually as a full-time organizer for Harlem's City College to mobilize student volunteers.&amp;lt;ref name=differs /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1985–88, Obama worked as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Developing Communities Project (DCP) of the Calumet Community Religious Conference (CCRC)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; funded with a $25,000 grant by [[Bill Ayers]]' Woods Fund. ''[[The New York Times]]'' reported he was paid $1,000 a year, with $2,000 extra for a car&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Malveaux, Suzanne (August 20, 2008). [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0808/20/se.02.html Transcript of &amp;quot;Barack Obama Revealed&amp;quot;].  CNN website/Transcripts. See [[CNN]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Scott, Janny (September 9, 2007).  [https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted=all &amp;quot;In 2000, a streetwise veteran schooled a bold young Obama].&amp;quot; ''The New York Times''.  See ''[[The New York Times]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; however stories vary wildly. Jerry Kellman, who hired him, says it was &amp;quot;$10,000 a year and a $2,000 car allowance&amp;quot;.  Obama himself gave different numbers; his memoir says $10,000 (as well as the car), in his Wesleyan speech he gave it as &amp;quot;$12,000 a year plus $2,000 for an old, beat-up car&amp;quot;, and when he announced his candidacy for president, it was &amp;quot;a group of churches had offered me a job as a community organizer for $13,000 a year&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ryan Lizza at ''[[The New Republic]]'' reported that &amp;quot;Jean Rudd of the Woods Fund...had provided Kellman with his original $25,000 to hire Obama&amp;quot;.  Ari Berman reported in ''[[The Nation]]'' that the &amp;quot;[Woods Fund] gave a $25,000 grant to the Developing Communities Project, which hired Obama&amp;quot;. CBS Channel 2 in Chicago ran a story with a document showing that Obama's proposed salary in 1987 was $25,000, a number that the Obama campaign confirmed while insisting at the same time his original salary was $13,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Beckwith (April 23, 2008 or bef.).  [http://theobamafile.com/obamaworks.htm &amp;quot;Community organizing&amp;quot;].  The Obama File website/Politics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Many of the organizers that Obama worked with in Chicago were experienced in the methods of [[Saul Alinsky]], and taught Obama many of the methods found in his book ''[[Rules for Radicals]]''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/03/14/how%20saul%20alinsky%20taught%20barack%20obama%20everything%20he%20knows%20about%20civic%20upheaval/ How Saul Alinsky Taught Barack Obama Everything He Knows About Civic Upheaval]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
During this time Obama joined Reverend Wright's Trinity United Church because in the words of Suzanne Malveaux of ''[[CNN]]'', &amp;quot;It was the church to join if you wanted to be one of Chicago's black movers and shakers.&amp;quot; At the time, community organizing involved close affiliation with churches, which was how Obama met Wright. Obama abandoned the fight against asbestos contamination in the Altgeld Gardens housing project to pursue personal interests and a career by enrollment at Harvard Law School in the winter of 1988.&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Bookbio.jpg|right|300px|thumb|The Birther movement was started by Obama himself.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''1988–1996: law practice'''&lt;br /&gt;
In 1988 Obama gained work as a Summer Associate at one of the most prestigious corporate law firms in the world, Sidley Austin LLP,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Lattman, Peter (May 11, 2007). [https://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/05/11/sidley-austin-when-barack-met-michelle/ &amp;quot;When Barack met Michelle&amp;quot;].  Wall Street Journal website/Business/Law Blog/Lawyers and Law Firms.  See ''[[Wall Street Journal]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Malveaux, Suzanne (August 20, 2008). [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0808/20/se.02.html Transcript of &amp;quot;Barack Obama Revealed&amp;quot;].  CNN website/Transcripts.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; whose partners included [[Newton Minow]], thanks to the recommendation of Minow's daughter Martha, a professor at Harvard Law School. It was at the Sidley Austin firm that Obama would meet Michelle Robinson, his future domestic partner.&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; From 1993-96 he practiced civil rights law including suing Citibank to force them into making [[Subprime loan|subprime mortgage]]s to minority borrowers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schweizer, Peter (October 5, 2009).  [https://www.forbes.com/2009/10/03/community-reinvestment-act-mortgages-housing-opinions-contributors-peter-schweizer.html &amp;quot;A poisonous cocktail: Expanding the Community Reinvestment Act&amp;quot;]. ''Forbes'' website.  See [[Forbes]].  In ''Selma S. Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank'', lead attorney Obama alleged that although his clients had been denied mortgages &amp;quot;because of delinquent credit obligations and adverse credit,&amp;quot; they were really victims of institutional racism. The suit was brought about by the Community Reinvestment Act, so called affirmative action mortgage lending. The plaintiffs won $60,000, and the court awarded Sidley Austin $950,000 for the work of Obama and two other attorneys.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After graduating from Harvard he was hired by Miner, Barnhill, &amp;amp; Galland, a small politically-connected law firm.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lattman, Peter (May 11, 2007). [https://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/05/11/sidley-austin-when-barack-met-michelle/ &amp;quot;When Barack met Michelle&amp;quot;].  Wall Street Journal website/Business/Law Blog/Lawyers and Law Firms.  See ''[[Wall Street Journal]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  It was at Miner, Barnhill, &amp;amp; Galland that he would meet influential real estate developer [[Tony Rezko]].&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1991–1992: Project Vote'''&lt;br /&gt;
In 1991 Obama was recruited by Sandy Newman to head the Chicago chapter of Project Vote!,&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; and in 1992 was the Executive Director, overseeing a voter registration drive which registered 125,000 black voters and was credited with defeating popular incumbent Democrat Senator Alan Dixon in the primary and electing [[Carol Moseley-Braun]] as a reprisal for Dixon's support for Supreme Court Justice [[Clarence Thomas]].&amp;lt;ref name=PurdumandScott&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Purdum, Todd (March 2008).  [https://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/03/obama200803 &amp;quot;Raising Obama&amp;quot;]. ''Vanity Fair''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Scott, Janny (July 30, 2007). [https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/us/politics/30obama.html?pagewanted=all &amp;quot;In Illinois, Obama proved pragmatic and shrewd&amp;quot;]. ''The New York Times'' website.  See ''[[New York Times]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1991-1995: Author'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995 Obama published ''[[Dreams From My Father (autobiography)|Dreams From My Father]]'' about his life and family background.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; It was in a 1992 book Obama claimed to have been born in Kenya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====1995: Nation of Islam====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Barack-Hussein-Obama-mit-Louis-Farrakhan-528x524.jpg|right|300px|thumb|Barack Obama with the notorious [[anti-Semite]], [[Louis Farrakhan]]. Farrakhan calls [[Jews]] &amp;quot;pigs and dogs.&amp;quot; The [[Anti-Defamation League]] identifies Farrakhan as the nation's “leading anti-Semite.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.adl.org/resources/profiles/the-nation-of-islam The Nation of Islam], Anti-Defamation League.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ''Encyclopedia Britannica'', prior to the information being scrubbed from its website in mid-April 2008 during the Democratic Presidential Primaries, Obama was one of three prominent organizers of black supremacist group the [[Nation of Islam]]'s [[Million Man March]] on Washington, D.C.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hoft, Jim (April 2, 2008).  [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2008/04/wright-obama-helped-organize-march-with-louis-farrakhan/ &amp;quot;Wright &amp;amp; Obama helped organize march with Louis Farrakhan&amp;quot;].  Gateway Pundit website.  See [[Gateway Pundit]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''1992–2004: lecturer at University of Chicago'''&lt;br /&gt;
Obama taught part-time at the [[University of Chicago]] Law School&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt; from 1992–2004. Though Obama erroneously describes himself as a &amp;quot;constitutional law professor&amp;quot;,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Whiteman, Timothy (April 5, 2013).  [http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-complains-of-being-constrained-by-a-system-founding-father-put-place &amp;quot;Obama complains of being 'constrained by a system' Founding Fathers put in place&amp;quot;].  Examiner.com/News/Politics/Republican.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he was actually only a senior lecturer and the class he taught the most times was called &amp;quot;Current Issues in Racism and the Law&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Holt, Mytheos (September 20, 2012).  [https://www.theblaze.com/stories/2012/09/20/obamas-favorite-course-to-teach-at-the-university-of-chicago-revealed/ &amp;quot;Obama’s favorite course to teach at the University of Chicago revealed&amp;quot;]. The Blaze/Stories/Media. See [[The Blaze]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was a Lecturer from 1992–96, teaching 3 courses per year&amp;lt;cite&amp;gt;, and a senior lecturer from 1996–2004. After Obama was criticized for lying about his job title, the University of Chicago released a statement stating that senior lecturers are considered Law School faculty and regarded as professors but not full-time or tenured. Obama was invited to join the faculty in a full-time, tenured track position several times during this period but declined each time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.law.uchicago.edu/media &amp;quot;Media inquiries: Statement regarding Barack Obama&amp;quot;] (March 2008 or bef.). University of Chicago Law School website.  See [[University of Chicago]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Awards===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama shares the distinction with [[Richard Nixon]] and [[Josef Stalin]] as twice being named ''[[Time magazine]]'' person of the year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2009 Nobel Peace Prize'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On October 9, 2009, Barack H. Obama became the third sitting U.S. President&amp;lt;ref name=wilsons&amp;gt;Wilson, Scott (October 10, 2009). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/09/AR2009100900914.html &amp;quot;President Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize&amp;quot;]. ''Washington Post'' website.  See [[Washington Post]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize &amp;quot;''for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples''&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/press.html &amp;quot;The Nobel Prize for 2009: Press release&amp;quot;] (October 9, 2009).  Nobel Prize website [Oslo, Norway]/Nobel Prizes/Peace/Laureates/2009.  Accessed May 13, 2012.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama stated that he was &amp;quot;surprised and deeply humbled&amp;quot; to receive the unexpected award,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CNN (October 9, 2009). [https://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/10/09/nobel.peace.prize/index.html?eref=ib_us &amp;quot;Obama: Nobel Peace Prize is 'Call to Action'&amp;quot;]. CNN website/World/Europe.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and also said, &amp;quot;To be honest, I do not feel that I deserve to be in the company of so many of the transformative figures who've been honored by this prize—men and women who have inspired me and inspired the entire world through their courageous pursuit of peace&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=wilsons /&amp;gt; The award was widely criticized given Obama's then lack of accomplishments.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Chazan, Guy and MacDonald, Alistair (October 11, 2009)  [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125509603349176083.html &amp;quot;Nobel Committee's decision courts controversy&amp;quot;]. ''The Wall Street Journal'' website/World.&lt;br /&gt;
*Associated Press (October 9, 2009). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10/09/obamas-peace-prize-draws-criticism-liberals/ &amp;quot;Obama's Peace Prize draws criticism, even from some liberals&amp;quot;].  Fox News website/Politics.  See [[Associated Press]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==1996–2003: Illinois State Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
'''1996 election'''&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Radical roots of Barack Hussein Obama|Maoist Thought}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 1995 a cadre of like-minded individuals gathered for a fundraising event in the early career of Barack Obama hosted by [[Weather Underground]] (WUO) [[terrorist]] [[William Ayers|William &amp;quot;Bill&amp;quot; Ayers]]. Besides Obama, those in attendance were Ayers wife [[Bernardine Dohrn]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Geyer, Georgie Anne and Beech, Keyes (October 1970). &amp;quot;Cuba: School for U.S. Radicals [five part series]&amp;quot;. ''Chicago Daily News''/''Chicago Sun-Times''.  Excerpted in&lt;br /&gt;
[https://vault.fbi.gov/Weather%20Underground%20(Weathermen) ''Foreign Influence:  Weather Underground Organization (WUO)''] (August 20, 1976), pp. 113-115.  FBI.  Retrieved from &amp;quot;Weather Underground (Weathermen)&amp;quot; webpage PDF rendering, part 3 of 6, pp. 5-7 at FBI website/FBI Records: The Vault. Located by The Real Barack Obama blog.  See ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Carl Davidson, veterans of [[guerrilla warfare]] training in [[Cuba]] just prior to the 1968 Democrat National Convention riots.  Ayers and Dohrn have taken credit for, and never denied, bombing the [[U.S. Capitol]], the [[Pentagon]] and the [[State Department]].    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ayers and Dohrn used their celebrity status among [[leftist]]s to launch Obama's career. Ayers, Dohrn and [[Jeff Jones]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klein, Aaron (August 13, 2009).  [https://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=106653 &amp;quot;Obama's 'green jobs czar' worked with terror founder&amp;quot;].  WorldNetDaily website.  &amp;quot;[[Van Jones]]...served on board of...&amp;quot; &amp;quot;activist group where ex-Weatherman serves as top director&amp;quot;'. See [[WorldNetDaily]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; are authors of ''[[Bill Ayers#Prairie Fire Organizing Committee and Maoist thought|Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-imperialism]]'', the title taken from [[Quotations from Chairman Mao|''The Sayings of Mao Zedong'']].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://archive.org/details/QuotationsFromChairmanMaoTse-tung/ ''Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-Tung''] (1966), 2nd ed.  Retrieved from Internet Archive.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The book declares &amp;quot;we are [[communist]] men and women.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klehr, Harvey (1988). ''Far Left of Center: The American Radical Left Today'' (New Brunswick: Transaction Books), p. 109.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ayers later jokingly, publicly admitted to ghostwriting Obama's book, ''[[Dreams From My Father (autobiography)|Dreams From My Father]]''&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cashill, Jack (March 28, 2011). [https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/03/ayers_affirms_he_wrote_dreams.html &amp;quot;Ayers affirms he wrote ''Dreams from my Father''&amp;quot;].  American Thinker website/Blog.  See [[American Thinker]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Obama was to appoint several openly avowed Maoists to prominent White House and Executive Branch positions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fund, John (October 21, 2009). [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704597704574487431322664964.html &amp;quot;From Mao to Obama&amp;quot;]. ''Wall Street Journal'' website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===A Charter of Negative Liberties===&lt;br /&gt;
In a 2001 interview on WBEZ FM Chicago Public Radio, Senator Obama said some critically disparaging things about the [[United States Constitution]].  He said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to vest formal rights in previously dispossessed peoples. So that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be okay.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
But the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as people tried to characterize the Warren court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can’t do to you, it says what the federal government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the federal government or the state government must do on your behalf. And that hasn’t shifted. One of the I think tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think that there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributed change and in some ways we still suffer from that.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2008/11/03/barack-obamas-poor-understanding-of-the-constitution Barack Obama's Poor Understanding of the Constitution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jr9mLB3yKs Obama Constitution Negative Liberties.flv]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wnd.com/2008/10/79225/ Obama rips U.S. Constitution]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Backstabbing fellow Democrats'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Barack Obama ran for the Illinois state senate in 1996. He was initially supported by incumbent [[Alice Palmer]], who declared she would run for the U.S. Congress. However, when her bid for Congress failed on November 28, 1995, she tried to run for her old seat in the March 1996 election. Her supporters asked Obama to step aside, although whether this was with her permission remains uncertain.&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt; Not only did Obama not step down, he gathered a team of high-priced lawyers, including fellow Harvard Law School graduate Thomas Johnson, to challenge his opponent's petition signatures on technicalities after the filing deadline had passed. Such tactics are legal and frequently used in Chicago; in 2006 they eliminated 67 of the 245 aldermanic candidates;&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle&amp;gt;Jackson, David and Long, Ray (April 4, 2007).  [http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2007-04-04/news/0704030881_1_petitions-voter-rights-candidates &amp;quot;Barack Obama: Showing his bare knuckles&amp;quot;]. ''Chicago Tribune'' website.  See ''[[Chicago Tribune]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; yet nevertheless led to the term &amp;quot;hardball&amp;quot; by ''The New York Times''&amp;lt;ref name=pragmatic /&amp;gt; and &amp;quot;cutthroat&amp;quot; by David Mendel as reported by both CNN&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; and MSNBC.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; The ''Chicago Tribune'' declared Obama had mastered &amp;quot;the bare-knuckle arts of Chicago electoral politics&amp;quot;, noting &amp;quot;The man now running for president on a message of giving a voice to the voiceless first entered public office not by leveling the playing field, but by clearing it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle /&amp;gt; As one of Obama's four opponents, eliminated through his ballot challenges, would put it: {{cquote|&amp;quot;Why say you're for a new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago politics to remove legitimate candidates? He talks about honor and democracy, but what honor is there in getting rid of every other candidate so you can run scot-free? Why not let the people decide?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
—Gha-is Askia, 1996 Illinois Senate candidate&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, David &amp;amp; Long, Ray (April 3, 2007). [https://web.archive.org/web/20130123154440/http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/obama/chi-070403obama-ballot-archive,0,5297304,full.story &amp;quot;Obama knows his way around a ballot&amp;quot;]. ''Chicago Tribune'' website.  Retrieved from January 23, 2013 archive at Internet Archive.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} Mark Ewell, another candidate, filed 1,286 signatures, and Obama's challenges left him 86 short of the minimum requirement (757).&amp;lt;ref name=spivak&amp;gt;Spivak, Todd (February 28, 2008).  [https://www.houstonpress.com/2008-02-28/news/barack-obama-screamed-at-me/ &amp;quot;Barack Obama and me&amp;quot;]. ''Houston Press'' website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ewell filed a federal lawsuit contesting the election board's decision but Tom Johnson intervened, and Ewell's case was dismissed just a few days later. Ewell and other Obama opponents were using early 1995 polling sheets to verify signatures of registered voters, but city authorities had just purged 15,871 unqualified people from the 13th district list, and Obama's challenges used the more recent, updated list. Askia was left 69 signatures short of the requirement. If names were printed instead of signed in cursive, they were declared invalid. If they were good but the person registering the signatures wasn't a registered voter (e.g. underage) they were invalid.&amp;lt;ref name=hardball&amp;gt;Griffin, Drew &amp;amp; Johnston, Kathleen (May 29, 2008). [https://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/29/obamas.first.campaign/ &amp;quot;Obama played hardball in first Chicago campaign&amp;quot;]. CNN website.  Article text begins: &amp;quot;When the Democratic National Committee meets Saturday on the thorny issue of seating the Florida and Michigan delegations...&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Palmer had according to Obama campaign consult Ronald Davis, used two children to help gather her petition signatures. To this day Palmer denies the challenges were valid, and maintains she could have overcome the objections with more time and resources.&amp;lt;ref name=bareknuckle /&amp;gt; Thanks to his lawyers, Obama would win the election without a single other candidate on the ballot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2000 election'''&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Illinois 1st congressional district election, 2000]]''&lt;br /&gt;
In 2000, Obama lost his only political election when he chose to run against experienced incumbent and former [[Black Panther]] Bobby L. Rush for the U.S. Congress in a 65% black district. Rush's name recognition began at 90%, Obama's at 11%. Michelle Obama opposed taking on such an iconic figure dear to the community and threatened divorce.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bates, Daniel (May 16, 2012).  [https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2145035/Michelle-Obama-prepared-divorce-papers-separate-Barack-leaving-suicidal.html &amp;quot;New book claims Michelle Obama prepared divorce papers to separate from Barack—leaving him so depressed friends feared he'd kill himself&amp;quot;].  ''Daily Mail'' website. See ''[[Daily Mail]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Establishment Democrats considered Obama &amp;quot;a white man in [[blackface]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gilmore, Jim (reporter, producer).  (October 9, 2012). [https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/choice-2012/transcript-29/ &amp;quot;Transcript of 'Barack Obama' in Kirk, Michael and Wiser, Mike (producers) '''Frontline'':  The Choice 2012'&amp;quot;]. PBS website/WGBH/Frontline/film/The Choice 2012.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rush said of Obama, &amp;quot;He went to Harvard and became an educated fool,&amp;quot; adding, &amp;quot;We’re not impressed with these folks with these eastern elite degrees.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ballasy, Nicholas (March 28, 2012).  [https://dailycaller.com/2012/03/28/bobby-rush-in-2000-obamas-a-harvard-educated-fool-who-thinks-he-knows-all-about-the-civil-rights-protests/ &amp;quot;Bobby Rush in 2000: Obama a Harvard ‘educated fool’ who ‘thinks he knows all about’ the ‘civil rights protests’&amp;quot;].  Daily Caller website.  See [[Daily Caller]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Todd Spivak would give voice to this impression of Obama, noting that&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;My view of Obama then wasn't all that different from the image he projects now....One thing I can say is, I never heard him launch into the preacher-man voice he now employs during speeches. He sounded vanilla, and activists in his mostly black district often chided him for it.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Rush would go on to win the Primary with 61.02% of the vote; Obama received 30.36%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott, Janny (September 9, 2007).  [https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/09/us/politics/09obama.html?pagewanted=all &amp;quot;In 2000, a streetwise veteran schooled a bold young Obama].&amp;quot; ''The New York Times''.  See ''[[The New York Times]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The loss led to Obama considering dropping out of politics altogether, particularly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, since his name sounds similar to &amp;quot;Osama bin Laden&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''State Senate voting record'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama entered the Illinois Senate promising change to a corrupt system. He mixed often radical votes with more pragmatic agreements. Possibly one of his most radical votes was against requiring medical care for aborted children who survive [[abortion|the procedure]] – in fact, the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council ascribed him a 100% rating for his consistently pro-choice votes.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;cbs illinois&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sbgpzfpr/snop/p2/stories/2007/01/17/politics/main2369157.shtml|title=Obama record may be gold mine for critics|publisher=CBS News website|last=Clark|first=Amy|date=January 17, 2007}}  See [[CBS News]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He was criticized for using the statehouse as a stepping stone for a more illustrious career: Steven J. Rauschenberger, a [[Republican]], said prior to Obama's election as president: “He is a very bright but very ambitious person who has always had his eyes on the prize, and it wasn’t Springfield. If he deserves to be president, it is not because he was a great legislator.”&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|publisher=''The New York Times'' website|title=In Illinois, Obama proved pragmatic and shrewd|last=Scott|first=Janny|date=July 30, 2007|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sboxugmc/snop/p2/2007/07/30/us/politics/30obama.html}}.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The statehouse was majority Republican, so the Senator was sometimes forced to compromise. He formed allegiances across party lines to pass [[campaign finance]] reform that banned most gifts by lobbyists, prohibited spending campaign money for legislators’ personal use and required electronic filing of campaign disclosure reports.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama also helped pass a so-called “driving-while-black bill”, which required the police to collect data on the race of drivers they stopped as a way to monitor [[racial profiling]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt illinois&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama established himself as a chief spokesperson in opposition to the [[War on Terror]] during an October 2002 rally at Federal Plaza in Chicago&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The rally was organized by Chicagoans Against War in Iraq (CAWI) later renamed Chicagoans Against War and Injustice.  See Davidson, Carl (November 2, 2006). [https://web.archive.org/web/20100811115415/http://www.noiraqwar-chicago.org/?page_id=2 &amp;quot;About CAWI&amp;quot;].  Chicagoans Against War and Injustice website.  Retrieved from August 11, 2010 archive at Internet Archive.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[community organizing|organized]] by veteran [[Mao]]ist and webmaster of [[Progressives for Obama]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.linkedin.com/in/carldavidson Carl Davidson] (2010 or bef.) LinkedIn [Profile page/Experience/Webmaster]. Retrieved March 13, 2010 and February 13, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Carl Davidson]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2003 Emil Jones deal'''&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[2003 Barack Obama deal with Emil Jones]]''&lt;br /&gt;
When Illinois' U.S. Senator Peter Fitzgerald announced he would be retiring in April 2003, Obama jumped at the opportunity, declaring that he would be a candidate for the U.S. Senate in 2004.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; To boost his chances Obama approached the newly crowned president of the Illinois Senate, Emil Jones Jr., with a proposal. According to Jones, whom Obama has since called his &amp;quot;godfather&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=godfather&amp;gt;Associated Press (March 31, 2008). [https://www.cbsnews.com/news/obamas-political-godfather-in-illinois/ &amp;quot;Obama's political 'godfather' in Illinois&amp;quot;].  CBS News website.  See [[Associated Press]], CBS News.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the conversation went as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;After I was elected president, in 2003, he came to see me, a couple months later. And he said to me, he said, ‘You’re the senate president now, and with that, you have a lot of pow-er.’  And I told Barack, ‘You think I got a lot of pow-er now?,’ and he said, ‘Yeah, you got a lot of pow-er.’ And I said, ‘What kind of pow-er do I have?’ He said, ‘You have the pow-er to make a United States sen-a-tor!’  I said to Barack, I said, ‘That sounds good!’ I said, ‘I haven’t even thought of that.’ I said, ‘Do you have someone in mind you think I could make?,’ and he said, ‘Yeah. Me.’&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=PurdumandScott/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the deal, Obama's entire Illinois Senate legislative record was, as longtime Obama reporter Todd Spivak put it, built in a single year. During his 7th and final year in the Illinois Senate, Obama sponsored an incredible 26 bills into law, including many he now points to when criticized as inexperienced&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt;—as CNN's Suzanne Malveaux observed, &amp;quot;With help from on high, Obama got his name on hundreds of bills that he pushed through.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=revealed /&amp;gt; Jones not only had Obama craft legislation addressing daily tragedies to raise his political profile,&amp;lt;ref name=godfather /&amp;gt; he also appointed Obama head of almost all high-profile legislation in the Illinois Senate, angering other state legislators with more seniority who'd spent years supporting the bills.&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; Illinois State Senator Rickey Hendon, the original sponsor of the famous racial profiling bill requiring videotaped confessions in police interrogations, complained bitterly about Jones' decision.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Malveaux, Suzanne (August 20, 2008). [http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0808/20/se.02.html &amp;quot;Transcript of 'Barack Obama Revealed'&amp;quot;].  CNN website/Transcripts.&lt;br /&gt;
*Spivak, Todd (March 25, 2004). [http://www.illinoistimes.com/Springfield/article-922-in-the-black.html &amp;quot;In the black&amp;quot;]. ''Illinois Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Jones' influence had a major impact on Obama's chances in the 2004 elections, preventing major political players from backing Obama's opponents. To quote Emil Jones,{{cquote|&amp;quot;He knew if he had me in the run for the Senate, it would put a block on the current mayor. The current mayor and the father of the controller, which was Dan Hynes, they were roommates in Springfield when the mayor was a state senator, so they had a relationship. Another big financial backer for the governor was Blair Hull. Barack knew if he had me it would checkmate the governor, ’cause the governor couldn’t come out and go with Blair Hull, ’cause the governor needs me. Same with the mayor. So he had analyzed and figured all of that out. He knew I could help him with labor support. And I could put a checkmate on some of the local politicians that didn’t know him, but they couldn’t really go against me.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
—Emil Jones&amp;lt;ref name=raisingobama /&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2004–2008: U.S. Senate==&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also: [[Early life and career of Barack Hussein Obama#U.S. Senate .282004-2008.29|Barack Obama:U.S. Senate (2004-2008)]], [[United States Senate election in Illinois, 2004]]''&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:obama.jpg|thumb|left|Senator Barack Obama]] Obama was a relatively undistinguished Senator.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2004 Primary election'''&lt;br /&gt;
Despite initially trailing in the polls to frontrunner [[Blair Hull]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Spivak, Todd (March 25, 2004). [http://www.illinoistimes.com/Springfield/article-922-in-the-black.html &amp;quot;In the black&amp;quot;]. ''Illinois Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama greatly benefited from what the ''Chicago Tribune'' called &amp;quot;the most inglorious campaign implosion in Illinois political history&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=mendell&amp;gt;Mendell, David (March 17, 2004). [http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-03-17/news/0403170332_1_blair-hull-gery-chico-blacks-and-liberal-whites &amp;quot;Obama routs Democratic foes&amp;quot;]. ''Chicago Tribune'' website.  See ''[[Chicago Tribune]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when pressure from journalists and opposing candidates, just weeks before the election, forced the unsealing of Hull's messy divorce files.&amp;lt;ref name=blairhull&amp;gt;Voegeli, William (March 19, 2004). [https://web.archive.org/web/20070826095930/http://www.claremont.org/publications/pubid.339/pub_detail.asp &amp;quot;The rise and fall of Blair Hull&amp;quot;].  The Claremont Institute website.  Retrieved from August 26, 2007 archive at Internet Archive.  See [[Claremont Institute]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The files revealed Hull's ex-wife's accusations of verbal and physical abuse.&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; Hull would afterward criticize the media, stating, &amp;quot;As for the press, I will never read the newspaper the same way again.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=mendell /&amp;gt; Obama would go on to win the Primary with 53% of the vote.&amp;lt;ref name=blairhull /&amp;gt; Obama's unexpected victory led to him being termed a &amp;quot;rising star&amp;quot; by the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Howlett, Debbie (March 18, 2004). [https://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/2004-03-18-obama-usat_x.htm Dems &amp;quot;See a rising star in Illinois Senate Candidate&amp;quot;].  ''USA Today'' website/News/Politics-Elections/Nation/Campaign 2004.  See ''[[USA Today]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2004 General election, Jack Ryan'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once again Obama found himself trailing to popular front-runner [[Jack Ryan]], and once again a candidate's campaign imploded thanks to media intervention. In an unprecedented move, the ''Chicago Tribune'' and local TV station WLS sued to force the unsealing of Ryan's divorce files, despite opposition from both Ryan and his wife, Jeri Ryan, who in the files accused Jack Ryan of trying to coerce her to perform sex acts in public. Though Ryan advisors told him he could still win if using a negative attack on Obama, Ryan refused to engage in what he considered dirty politics.&amp;lt;ref name=abandon&amp;gt;Associated Press (June 26, 2004).  [https://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/state/2004-06-25-ryan_x.htm &amp;quot;Jack Ryan abandons Senate bid&amp;quot;].  ''USA Today'' website/News/Politics-Elections/State/Campaign 2004.  See [[Associated Press]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ryan then dropped out of the race (per request by the Illinois GOP&amp;lt;ref name=idealist&amp;gt;Sangwan, Rahul (October 1, 2004). [https://web.archive.org/web/20060924232703/http://www.dartmouthindependent.com/archives/2004/10/jack_ryan_81_th.html &amp;quot;Jack Ryan '81: The conservative idealist&amp;quot;]. ''Dartmouth Independent'' website.  Retrieved from September 24, 2006 archive at Internet Archive.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), following which the Illinois GOP scrambled to find a replacement, leaving Obama uncontested for weeks to campaign and build up public support. On top of all this, Obama was selected to give the keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention (July 27&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama, Barack (June 26, 2004). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19751-2004Jul27.html &amp;quot;Transcript:  Illinois Senate candidate Barack Obama [Keynote address at 2004 Democratic National Convention&amp;amp;#93;&amp;quot;].  Transcribed by FDCH E-Media.  ''Washington Post'' website.  See ''[[Washington Post]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;), catapulting him into the national spotlight, and leading to further media publicity terming him a &amp;quot;rising star&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Page, Susan and Despeignes, Peronet (July 28, 2004). [https://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/nation/president/2004-07-28-obama-speech_x.htm &amp;quot;Rising star brings Democrats to their feet&amp;quot;]. ''USA Today'' website/News/Politics-Elections/Nation/President/Campaign 2004.  See ''[[USA Today]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''2004 General election, Alan Keyes'''&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main Article: [[Obama born alive controversy]]''&lt;br /&gt;
After a number of candidates including former [[Chicago Bears]] coach Mike Ditka declined to run,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CNN (August 9, 2004). [https://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/08/senate.illinois.keyes/ &amp;quot;Keyes challenges Obama for Illinois Senate seat&amp;quot;]. CNN website/Politics/America Votes 2004.  See [[CNN]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the Illinois GOP finally settled on fiery [[Alan Keyes]], a former Ambassador to the Economic and Social Counsel of the United Nations,&amp;lt;ref name=spivak /&amp;gt; with less than 3 months left before the November 2004 election.&amp;lt;ref name=msnbc /&amp;gt; His sudden entrance into the state for the election was initially attacked in the press as &amp;quot;carpetbagging&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-08-06/news/0408060313_1_mr-keyes-judy-baar-topinka-alan-keyes &amp;quot;The GOP's rent-a-senator&amp;quot;] (August 6, 2004). ''Chicago Tribune'' website.  See ''[[Chicago Tribune]]''. &lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50885-2004Aug8.html &amp;quot;Mr. Keyes the carpetbagger&amp;quot;] (August 9, 2004).  ''Washington Post'', p. A14.  Retrieved from ''Washington Post'' website.   See ''[[Washington Post]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Pearson, Rick (September 5, 2004). [http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-09-05/news/0409050304_1_selfish-hedonist-alan-keyes-illinois-republican-party &amp;quot;Keyes, state GOP gearing up blame campaign&amp;quot;].  ''Chicago Tribune'' website/News.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keyes repeatedly claimed his primary motivation for entering a race he had seemingly no chance of winning was his disgust at Obama's votes on the popular [[Born Alive]] bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Keyes, Alan (August 18, 2004). [https://www.mail-archive.com/newsandviews@chuckmuth.com/msg00699.html &amp;quot;How YOU can help Alan Keyes for Senate!&amp;quot;] Message from Keyes2004 Inc. to multiple internet mailing lists.  Retrieved from archive of newsandviews internet mailing list at The Mail Archive website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Keyes, from his first day of arriving in Illinois (August 9, 2004),&amp;lt;ref name=assails&amp;gt;Associated Press (August 9, 2004). [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5654128/ &amp;quot;Keyes assails Obama's abortion views&amp;quot;].  NBC News website/Politics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; accused Obama of having voted against bills mandating medical care for newborn children, and supporting &amp;quot;infanticide&amp;quot; (the term twice used in the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;United States Congress (October 21, 2003).  [https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/108/s3/text/enr &amp;quot;S. 3 (108th): &amp;quot;Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003&amp;quot;], sec. 2, subsec. 14, paras. G and O.  Govtrack.us website/Congress/Bills/108th Congress/Senate bill 3/Text.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;) where hospitals left newborn infants to die like garbage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Keyes, Alan (June 2008 or bef.)   [http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=341 &amp;quot;Alan Keyes on the Tavis Smiley Show&amp;quot;]. Alan Keyes Archives website.  Transcript of interview by Tavis Smiley.  ''Tavis Smiley Show'' (New York City: National Public Radio, August 31, 2004).  See [[NPR]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Keyes, Alan (June 2008 or bef.)   [http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=337 &amp;quot;Alan Keyes on CBS2 Chicago This Morning&amp;quot;]. Alan Keyes Archives website.  Transcript of interview with ''CBS This Morning'' show. ''CBS This Morning'' (Chicago:  CBS 2, August 30, 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama in a debate on October 13, 2004, defended himself against Keyes' accusations of infanticide by claiming that Illinois law was already sufficient.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-10-13/news/0410140004_1_alan-keyes-senate-race-first-of-three-debates &amp;quot;Debate or discussion?&amp;quot;] (October 13, 2004). ''Chicago Tribune'' website/News.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, Keyes' rhetoric, calling Obama's votes &amp;quot;the slaveholder's position&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=assails /&amp;gt; and saying &amp;quot;Jesus Christ would not vote for Obama&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Keyes, Alan (June 2008 or bef.). [http://www.keyesarchives.com/transcript.php?id=348 &amp;quot;Alan Keyes on the Scott Thomas Show (AM1160 - WYLL)&amp;quot;].  Alan Keyes Archives website.  Transcript of interview by Scott Thomas. ''Scott Thomas Show'' (Chicago:  WYLL, AM 1160, September 7, 2004).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was widely ridiculed by the press. Keyes' unabashed criticism of homosexuality as &amp;quot;selfish hedonism&amp;quot; was also targeted.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Pearson, Rick (September 5, 2004). [http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2004-09-05/news/0409050304_1_selfish-hedonist-alan-keyes-illinois-republican-party &amp;quot;Keyes, state GOP gearing up blame campaign&amp;quot;].  ''Chicago Tribune'' website/News.&lt;br /&gt;
*Associated Press (September 2, 2004).  [https://www.nbcnews.com/id/5897569/ns/politics/t/keyes-cheneys-gay-daughter-practicing-selfish-hedonism/#.VsR94_krKWg &amp;quot;Keyes: Cheney's gay daughter practicing selfish hedonism&amp;quot;].  NBC News website/Politics.&lt;br /&gt;
*Pallasch, Abdon M. (September 2, 2004).  [https://web.archive.org/web/20040903052923/http://www.suntimes.com/output/elect/cst-nws-keyes02.html &amp;quot;Keyes' gay slam roils GOP&amp;quot;].  ''Chicago Sun-Times'' website/News/Elections.  Retrieved from September 3, 2004 archive at Internet Archive.  See ''[[Chicago Sun-Times]]''.  This article misquotes [[Liz Cheney]]; previous bulleted reference in this multiple reference gives full quote verified by CNN transcript.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama would ultimately win the election, 70% to 27%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cnn.hu/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/IL/S/01/index.html &amp;quot;America votes 2004: Election Results, U.S. Senate/Illinois&amp;quot;] (November 2, 2004). CNN Hungary website/Elections.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''U.S. Senate voting record'''&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's incomplete term in the U.S. Senate was largely not noteworthy. In voting against raising the [[debt limit]] in 2006 Obama famously said, &amp;quot;The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. government can’t pay its own bills. ... I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*''Washington Post'' FACT CHECKER, [https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/annotating-obamas-2006-speech-against-boosting-the-debt-limit/2013/01/14/aa8cf8c4-5e9b-11e2-9940-6fc488f3fecd_blog.html Annotating Obama’s 2006 speech against boosting the debt limit], Washington Post, Glenn Kessler, 01/15/2013.&lt;br /&gt;
*Kaplan, Rebecca (April 11, 2011).  [https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/04/obama-once-opposed-debt-ceiling-hike/237129/ &amp;quot;Obama once opposed debt ceiling hike&amp;quot;]. ''The Atlantic'' website/Politics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2008 as candidate for president Obama called George W. Bush's request to raise the debt limit &amp;quot;irresponsible&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;unpatriotic&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kuTG19Cu_Q &amp;quot;Obama says adding $4 trillion to debt is unpatriotic [July 3, 2008&amp;amp;#93;&amp;quot;] (August 23, 2011). YouTube video, 0:38, posted by maywhitley31.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''National Journal'' ranked him the most liberal senator in 2007.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ranked&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sbgpzfpr/snop/p2/8301-502163_162-3775451-502163.html|title=&amp;quot;''National Journal'': Obama most liberal senator in 2007&amp;quot;|author=Montopoli, Brian|date=January 31, 2008|publisher=CBS News website}}.  See [[CBS News]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama frequently used the [[filibuster]] to obstruct the operations of government,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;O'Keefe, E. (2010, February 4). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/03/AR2010020303801_pf.html Obama criticizes Senate Republicans for delaying confirmation votes]. ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and voted against the [[minimum wage]] bill&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gill, Kathy (May 26, 2007). [https://web.archive.org/web/20070905140628/http://uspolitics.about.com/od/legislatio1/a/HR2206.htm &amp;quot;HR 2206 - Emergency appropriations [110th Congress, House of Representives, signed into law May 25, 2007&amp;amp;#93;&amp;quot;], About.com website/News &amp;amp; Issues/U. S. Politics: Current Events/Legislation.  Retrieved from September 5, 2007 archive at Internet Archive.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://more.gov.mtopgroup.com/2007/05/votes-hr-2206-iraq-supplemental.html Votes - H.R. 2206: Iraq Supplemental], May 28, 2007. Retrieved from Deeper Inside the Mountain, June 4, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; he introduced because it included a provision to pay active duty U.S. troops. He voted for the $700 billion TARP program to bailout the big banks after receiving more than $120,000 in contributions from [[Fannie Mae]], a government-sponsored entity&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;more than any other political candidate for office since 1989.  [https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.html Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Invest in Lawmakers], By Lindsay Renick Mayer, September 11, 2008. opensecrets.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; taken into conservatorship for mismanaging its affairs and responsible for all the big banks' problems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Opensecrets.org, of the 671,269 contributions to Obama during his time in the Senate, [[Goldman Sachs]], JP Morgan, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley were among the top 20 biggest money donors to his campaigns.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cid=N00009638&amp;amp;cycle=2008 Top 20 Contributors, 2007-2008]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.votesmart.org/finance.php?can_id=9490 Barack Obama II's Campaign Finances]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; All four subsequently received approximately $70 billion in taxpayer assisted [[bailout]] money from the [[TARP]] program he voted for.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2008/10/14/business/14bailout.graphic2.html ''Beneficiary Banks'', ''The New York Times''. 2008-10-14.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  UBS AG, a foreign bank and the 12th largest donor to Obama,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&amp;amp;cid=N00009638 Top 20 Contributors, 2007-2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; was fined $780 billion in February 2009 in a U.S. Federal Court on charges it helped thousands of Americans evade taxes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.investmentnews.com/article/20090219/FREE/902199983 ''UBS fined $780 million in tax evasion scandal,''] Investment News, February 19, 2009.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After just four short years, Obama still ranks number one over all time of Big Pharma money recipients with slightly under $5 million, followed by Hillary Clinton with a little more than $3.5 million.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary.php?ind=H04&amp;amp;cycle=All&amp;amp;recipdetail=S&amp;amp;mem=Y&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Since entering the Senate, prescription opioid deaths in the U.S. rose from 12,000 per year to over 46,000 per year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/prescribing.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presidential campaigns==&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to popular myth at the end of the [[Cold War]], Communism did not die, it only went into remission.  The rise of Barack Obama and passage of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) signaled a renewed attack on basic constitutional rights and a revival of a  spectre haunting humanity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2008===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Barack Hussein Obama 2008 Presidential campaign}}&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike Democrat contenders Hillary Clinton and John Kerry, Obama's hands were not &amp;quot;stained&amp;quot; with the Iraqi war resolution; a number of Democrats wanted to punish candidates for acting [[bi-partisan]] and called for his candidacy. His only career accomplishment until then had been the delivery of a speech at the 2004 [[Democratic National Convention]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Through heavy use of [[early voting]] by the Democrat political machine, Obama was elected president in 2008 in the midst of a severe economic meltdown and a foreign policy crisis. Obama outspent [[John McCain]] by hundreds of millions of dollars in 2008,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contriball.php?cycle=2008 &amp;quot;Candidate comparison: Top contributors 2008 cycle&amp;quot;] (betw. September–November 2013). OpenSecrets.org website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and spending more than a billion dollars from special interests to snag reelection in 2012.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/candidate.php?cycle=2012&amp;amp;id=N00009638 &amp;quot;Barack Obama (D): Candidate summary, 2012 cycle/Source of funds&amp;quot;] (betw. March–June 2013).  Opensecrets.org website.  34% Individual contributions, 67% large and corporate.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/index.php &amp;quot;2012 presidential race/Overall spending&amp;quot;] (betw. August–September 2015).  OpenSecrets.org website.  These special interests count of over $1 billion may have decreased at least for a time since August–September 2015, where a grand total of individual contributions of less than $1 billion is reflected, but the grand total is presumably incomplete (shown, for example, by the uncounted University of California contributions revealed when comparing the subtotal from the time before August–September 2015 to the time afterwards, the subtotal thus ''increasing''), has every chance of remaining close to its precise revised estimated amount at the beginning of that time (of $964 million) and does not include Super PAC contributions, which is ''indirect'' spending.&lt;br /&gt;
**([https://web.archive.org/web/20150304050735/https://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&amp;amp;id=N00009638 Link to version of this reference] on March 4, 2015 [whose pertinent subtotal which follows was the same back to the time indicated in the first bulleted reference] which shows $1,212,245 in contributions from the University of California.  This is ''vs.'' $1,350,139 in contributions shown in the version indicated by the Internet Archive to have been published between August–September 2015 and shown in versions at least for a time thereafter [version retrieved on February 7, 2016 shows the same amount].)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
Former [[Democrat]] Presidential candidate [[Joe Lieberman]] endorsed Obama's opponent [[John McCain]] in 2008 and declined to endorse Obama for the [[Presidential Election 2012|2012 presidential election]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lillis, M. (2012, April 22). [https://thehill.com/video/campaign/222929-lieberman-declines-to-endorse-in-presidential-race Sen. Lieberman declines to endorse in presidential race]. ''The Hill''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Primary election'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2007–08, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton competed for the Democrat nomination. Hillary Clinton cleverly resurrected the &amp;quot;Born Alive&amp;quot; controversy surrounding Obama that had lain largely dormant since 2004 (notwithstanding the continuing mentions by [[Jill Stanek]]), by accusing Obama of not being pro-choice for voting &amp;quot;Present&amp;quot; on a number of abortion-related bills&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bettelheim, Adriel (2008, February 13). &amp;quot;[https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/feb/13/obamas-present-tension/ Obama's 'Present' Tension].&amp;quot; ''PolitiFact''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;—including the Born Alive ones,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Berman, Russell (2008, January 17). &amp;quot;[https://www.nysun.com/national/clinton-obama-should-vote-no-on-abortion-issue/69700/ Clinton: Obama Should Vote 'No' On Abortion Issue She Backed].&amp;quot; ''[[New York Sun]]''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Hernandez, Raymond &amp;amp; Drew, Christopher (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20obama.html?pagewanted=all It's Not Just 'Ayes' and 'Nays': Obama's Votes in Illinois Echo].&amp;quot; ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and cowardly ducking the votes.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*''Politi-Fact''. &amp;quot;[https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2008/feb/13/hillary-clinton/yes-but-its-complicated/ Response to Hillary Clinton Comment for January 21st, 2008].&amp;quot; Truth-o-Meter.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dorning, Mike (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/criticism_of_obama_present_vot.html Clinton Camp Criticizes Obama 'Present' Votes].&amp;quot; The Swamp. ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led to criticism of Obama by two pro-choice organizations, Emily's List, and the [[National Organization for Women]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Dorning, Mike (2008, January 14). &amp;quot;[http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/01/obama_campaign_mounts_defense.html The Swamp: Obama Campaign Defends His Abortion-Rights Record].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dorn, Michael (2008, February 6). &amp;quot;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/02/obamas_voting_record_on_aborti_1.html Obama's Voting Record on Abortion].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&lt;br /&gt;
*Newton-Small, Jay (2008, January 14). &amp;quot;[http://swampland.time.com/2008/01/14/obama_campaign_defends_present/ Obama Campaign Defends 'Present' Abortion Votes].&amp;quot; ''[[Time Magazine]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, Pam Sutherland, the long-time head of Illinois Planned Parenthood, came to Obama's aid, criticizing Clinton for making the attack, and stating repeatedly that Obama's present votes were part of a broader strategy used by Planned Parenthood to keep Illinois voters from knowing their state senators were voting against the controversial and popular bills.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hernandez, Raymond &amp;amp; Drew, Christopher (2007, December 20). &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/20/us/politics/20cnd-obama.html?_r=2&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp;oref=slogin Obama's Vote in Illinois Was Often Just 'Present'].&amp;quot; ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Follmer, Max (2008, March 28). &amp;quot;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/01/14/obama-emphasizes-prochoic_n_81460.html Obama Emphasizes Pro-Choice Voting Record as Clinton Questions 'Present' Votes].&amp;quot; ''[[Huffington Post]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|&amp;quot;He came to me and said: ‘My members are being attacked. We need to figure out a way to protect members and to protect women. A ‘present’ vote was hard to pigeonhole which is exactly what Obama wanted. What it did was give cover to moderate Democrats who wanted to vote with us but were afraid to do so&amp;quot; because of how their votes would be used against them electorally. A ‘present’ vote would protect them. Your senator voted ‘present.’ Most of the electorate is not going to know what that means.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Pam Sutherland, President/CEO of Illinois Planned Parenthood Council, 1980-2012&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Davis, Teddy (2007, July 17). &amp;quot;[https://web.archive.org/web/20130414215754/https://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2007/07/obama-abortion/ Obama Abortion Dodges Blessed by Planned Parenthood], ''[[ABC News]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}As the contest in Iowa drew near and the former First Lady's inevitability was being usurped by a challenger, Hillary Clinton organizers began circulating rumors that Obama was secretly a Muslim.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/12/10/barackemail/ Obama Under the Clinton Microscope], By JEFF ZELENY, ''The New York Times'', December 10, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/12/06/clinton-volunteers-anti-obama-e-mail-causes-stir/ Clinton volunteer's sending of anti-Obama e-mail causes stir]. December 6, 2007. CNN&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=92143 Hillary Clinton Press Release - Sen. Obama Rewrites History], December 2, 2007, references Obama in the Muslim school in Indonesia in 3rd grade, quoting the ''[[Los Angeles Times]]'', 3/15/07&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/americas/article1995587.ece Obama ‘was educated in madrassa’], Tim Reid and Tom Baldwin, ''[[The Times of London]]'', January 20, 2007.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Clinton also made the claim repeatedly that while Obama was leading in Delegates she was winning the Popular Vote,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Koffler, Daniel (2008, May 28). &amp;quot;[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-koffler/hillary-clinton-and-the-p_b_103913.html Hillary Clinton and the Popular Vote: Not Wrong, but Meaningless].&amp;quot; ''Huffington Post''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Barone, Michael (2008, March 28). &amp;quot;[https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/barone/2008/03/28/projection-clinton-wins-popular-vote-obama-wins-delegate-count Projection: Clinton Wins Popular Vote, Obama Wins Delegate Vote].&amp;quot; ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; though this was in part because Obama hadn't been registered in Michigan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Romano, Andrew (2008, August 2). &amp;quot;[https://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/blogs/stumper/2008/06/02/clinton-s-popular-vote-claim-close-but-not-quite.html Clinton's Popular Vote Claim? Close--But Not Quite*].&amp;quot; ''[[Newsweek]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[[RealClearPolitics]]''. &amp;quot;[http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html 2008 Democratic Popular Vote].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's advantage with super-delegates over Clinton was about 2-to-1.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{Cite web|title=Superdelegate endorsements for Friday 6/6|work=Democratic Convention Watch|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/scyaetcar/szvnvskmbmff/p1/2008/06/superdelegate-endorsements-for-friday.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama was able to attract the support of [[liberals]] by pointing out that he had come out against the [[Iraq War]] &amp;quot;from the beginning&amp;quot; whereas Clinton had voted in favor of the war in 2002.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/shkoagohk/sopq/p2/news/politics/election2008/2008-01-31-democrats-debate_N.htm|title=Obama, Clinton stress differences on Iraq, issues|author=David Jackson|work=USA Today|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On June 7, 2008, Hillary Clinton withdrew from the Primaries, conceding the race and endorsing her opponent,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press''. &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24993082/ns/politics-decision_08/t/clinton-ends-historic-bid-endorses-obama/ Clinton Ends Historic Bid, Endorses Obama].&amp;quot; [[MSNBC]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when Obama passed the 2,118 Delegates required; winning 2,201 delegates to Clinton's 1,896.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[https://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primaries/results/scorecard/#D Election Center 2008].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Jeremiah Wright controversy'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obamaatcampdavid.jpg|thumb|right|President Obama in Evergreen Chapel]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Barack Obama and Liberation Theology}}&lt;br /&gt;
One major dilemma that arose for Obama during his campaign was his connection to his preacher [[Jeremiah Wright]]. Obama and his wife (raised a Baptist) were members of the Trinity [[United Church of Christ]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1776246/posts  Trinity United Church of Christ Website (Barack Hussein Obama's Church)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in Chicago, a church that embraced [[black liberation theology]] and its emphasis on empowering so-called &amp;quot;oppressed groups&amp;quot; against &amp;quot;establishment forces&amp;quot;. This denomination was the first in America to ordain gays as ministers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/31079.html Obama's church pushes controversial doctrines], March 20, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Church pastor Jeremiah Wright had been making inflammatory comments and posting his sermons online for sale. These include the statement &amp;quot;G-d damn America,&amp;quot; and in describing the September 11th attacks, &amp;quot;We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black [[South Africa]]ns, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickens are coming home to roost.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/Story?id=4443788 Obama's Pastor: G-d Damn America, U.S. to Blame for 9/11], [[ABC News]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Rev. Wright blamed America saying &amp;quot;We supported Zionism shamelessly while ignoring the Palestinians and branding anybody who spoke out against it as being [[anti-Semitic]].&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In April 2008, after 20 years in the church, candidate Obama made public statements poised to set him at odds with the man who conducted his wedding and baptized his children. With the negative publicity persisting, a month later Obama ended the friendship, left Wright's church, and blamed the media.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/05/31/obama-resigns-church-membership-in-chicago/ Obama Drops Church Membership in Chicago], [[Fox News]] May 31, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama claimed “It’s not fair to the other members of the church who seek to worship in peace...&amp;quot;, and distanced himself from  Wright's sermons  as &amp;quot;a bunch of rants that aren't grounded in the truth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;USA Today, [https://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20080430/1a_offlede30_dom.art.htm ''Obama breaks with former pastor, Candidate cites rants on U.S. role in terror, AIDS''], by Kathy Kiely and David Jackson&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20081211092533/https://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bulletin/bulletin_080430.htm ''Obama Says He Is Outraged By Wright's &amp;quot;Rants&amp;quot;'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Born Alive record resurfaces===&lt;br /&gt;
On June 30, 2008, Obama's voting record on the &amp;quot;Born Alive&amp;quot; bills came once more to the forefront when CNN gave voice to the growing controversy and revealed the defense Obama had been using since 2004–2008, that the Illinois bills he'd voted against were different from the federal bill, was false, since he'd brought up for a vote a bill word for word identical to the federal bill in the Health and Human Services Committee he chaired, and voted against it, defeating it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPZCXcTwZPY How He Really Voted on Abortion: Obama's Record Under Attack].&amp;quot; ''The Situation Room''. Uploaded to ''YouTube'' by [[Jill Stanek]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN''. &amp;quot;[http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0806/30/sitroom.02.html Transcripts: June 30, 2008].&amp;quot; The Situation Room.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This led in August to a confrontation between Obama and the [[NRLC]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[[National Right to Life Committee]]''. &amp;quot;[https://www.nrlc.org/news/2008/NRL08/ObamaCoverup.html Obama Cover-up Revealed on Born-Alive Abortion Survivor's Bill].&amp;quot; NRL News, Vol. 35, Issue 7-8, pg. 5.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After Obama accused critics of 'lying'&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Brody, David (2008, August 16). &amp;quot;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skq5M1Ksp_c McCain/Obama Forum].&amp;quot; ''CNN''. Uploaded to ''YouTube'' by [[Jill Stanek]].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;David Brody (August 16, 2008). &amp;quot;[http://blogs.cbn.com/thebrodyfile/archive/2008/08/16/obama-gets-heated-on-born-alive-infant-protection-act.aspx Obama Gets Heated on Born Alive Infant Protection Act].&amp;quot; ''[[CBN]] News''. The Brody File.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the NRLC challenged the assertion, and the Obama campaign conceded he &amp;quot;misspoke&amp;quot; and had voted against an identical bill to the &amp;quot;federal bill that everybody supported&amp;quot; but focused on Obama's new claim, that Illinois law was already sufficient to protect newborn children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berman, Russell (2008, August 18). &amp;quot;[https://www.nysun.com/national/obama-facing-attacks-from-all-sides-over-abortion/84059/ Obama Facing Attacks From All Sides Over Abortion Record].&amp;quot; ''[[New York Sun]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The NRLC promptly declared &amp;quot;Senator Barack Obama's four-year effort to cover up his full role in killing legislation to protect born-alive survivors of abortions continues to unravel.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Johnson, Douglas (2008, August 18). &amp;quot;[https://www.nrlc.org/ObamaBAIPA/Obamacoveruponbornalive.htm Obama Cover-up on Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Continues to Unravel After Sen. Obama Says NRLC is 'Lying'].&amp;quot; ''[[National Right to Life Committee]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Result'''&lt;br /&gt;
Obama made an effort to portray John McCain as similar to George W. Bush, drawing attention to McCain's refusal to criticize the unpopular president. McCain was particularly criticized for saying of how many years we should be willing to stay in Iraq, &amp;quot;Make it a hundred.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dobbs, Michael (2008, April 2). &amp;quot;[http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/04/mccains_100year_war.html FactChecker: McCain's '100-Year War'].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;{{cquote|&amp;quot;John McCain went on television and said that there has been great progress economically over the last seven-and-a-half years. John McCain thinks our economy has made great progress under George W. Bush? How could somebody who has been traveling across this country, somebody who came to Erie, Pennsylvania, say we’ve made great progress?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Barack Obama&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zeleny, Jeff (2008, April 18). &amp;quot;[https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/18/obama-criticizes-mccain-on-economic-stance/ Obama Criticizes McCain on Economic Stance].&amp;quot; ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} On August 22, Obama selected [[Joe Biden]] as his running mate for the vice presidency,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''CNN'' (2008, August 23). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2008-08-23/politics/biden.democrat.vp.candidate_1_biden-john-mccain-barack-obama?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Introduces Biden as Running Mate].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which would be contrasted one week later with John McCain's selection of [[Sarah Palin]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cooper, Michael &amp;amp; Bumiller, Elisabeth (2008, August 29). &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/us/politics/29palin.html?pagewanted=all Alaskan is McCain's Choice; First Woman on G.O.P. Ticket]. ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 2, 2008, Barack Obama won the presidential election with 365 electoral votes to John McCain's 173.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 14). &amp;quot;[http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/explorer.html Electoral Explorer].&amp;quot; Election Results 2008. ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama received 53% of the popular vote to John McCain's 46%.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2008, November 17). &amp;quot;[https://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/results/president/ President].&amp;quot; Election Center 2008. ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===2012===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article: [[Presidential Election 2012]]''&lt;br /&gt;
During his campaigns, Obama said that he intended to &amp;quot;[[Redistribution of wealth|spread the wealth around]]&amp;quot; and was portrayed as saying that entrepreneurs and employers deserve no credit for building their businesses.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Zuckerman, Mortimer B. (July 16, 2010).  [https://www.usnews.com/opinion/mzuckerman/articles/2010/07/16/obamas-anti-business-policies-are-our-economic-katrina &amp;quot;Obama's anti-business policies are our economic Katrina&amp;quot;]. ''U.S. News and World Report'' website.&lt;br /&gt;
*Barnes, Fred (July 22, 2009).  [https://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/619dvjlm.asp &amp;quot;An anti-business president&amp;quot;]. ''The Weekly Standard''. Vol. 14, No. 38.  Retrieved at The Weekly Standard website.  See [[The Weekly Standard]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Shedlock, Mike (August 20, 2010).  [http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2010/08/small-businesses-are-not-hiring-why.html &amp;quot;Small businesses are not hiring—Why should they?&amp;quot;]  Blogspot website/Mish's global economic trend analysis.&lt;br /&gt;
*Wright, C. Edmund (February 12, 2012).  [https://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/dear_mr_president_why_we_are_n.html &amp;quot;Dear Mr. President: Why we are not hiring&amp;quot;].  American Thinker website.  See [[American Thinker]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On March 1, 2013 Obama issued [[Executive Order|executive orders]] to implement his [[Budget sequester|sequester]] of budget cuts which&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bedard, Paul (February 27, 2013).  [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/dnc-boosts-obama-job-cut-threat-of-750000-to-2-million/article/2522664?custom_click=rss &amp;quot;Sequester hype: DNC adds 1.25 million job cuts to Obama's 750,000&amp;quot;].  ''Washington Examiner'' website.  Article located by [[Weasel Zippers]] website.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; has been widely criticized for destroying jobs in what was an anemic and fragile recovery.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Foys, Bob (February 26, 2013).  [http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-02-26/news/chi-20130226-foys_briefs_1_sequester-president-obama-press-secretary-jay-carney &amp;quot;President Obama's sequester&amp;quot;].  ''Chicago Tribune'' website.  See [[Chicago Tribune]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Warren L. Dean Jr., an adjunct professor of law at [[Georgetown University]] Law Center, wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
*{{obama income inequality}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's illegal domestic spying on political opponents and [[FISA abuse]] began in June 2012 before the November 2012 presidential election and was continued beyond his term of office by holdovers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/05/24/evidence-of-obama-administration-political-surveillance-beginning-mid-2012/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a [[NBC News]] poll, from August 2014, Obama's approval rating was a dismal 40%,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Murray, Mark (August 5, 2014). [http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/poll-americans-dissatisfied-economy &amp;quot;Poll: Obama’s approval rating hits all-time low&amp;quot;].  MSNBC website.  See [[MSNBC]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; showing that six in ten Americans disapproved of his [[liberal]] policies. Given that liberals frequently engage in [[Liberal lies|deceit]], the actual approval ratings could be much lower. When Obama left office, the same pollsters who prognosticated a blowout win for Hillary Clinton maintained Obama's approval rating was above 50%.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Birth certificate controversies===&lt;br /&gt;
: ''Main article: [[Barack Obama Controversies#Birth Certificate]]''&lt;br /&gt;
On April 27, 2011,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;CNN Political Unit (2011, April 27). &amp;quot;[http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/27/white-house-releases-obama-birth-certificate/ White House Releases Obama Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; a long-running controversy surrounding Obama's birth was largely put to rest&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Winter, J. (2011, April 29). &amp;quot;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/29/expert-says-obamas-birth-certificate-legit/ Expert: No Doubt Obama's Birth Certificate is Legit].&amp;quot; ''[[Fox News]]''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Tuchman, G. (2011, April 25). &amp;quot;[http://articles.cnn.com/2011-04-25/politics/birthers.obama.hawaii_1_birther-controversy-obama-opinion-research-corporation?_s=PM:POLITICS Obama Birther Claims Have No Merit].&amp;quot; ''CNN''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(2011, April 27). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42779923/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-releases-detailed-us-birth-certificate/ Obama Releases Detailed U.S. Birth Certificate].&amp;quot; ''MSNBC''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when Obama had his long-form birth certificate posted at WhiteHouse.gov.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[https://us-east-1.tchyn.io/snopes-production/uploads/2014/02/obama-longform.jpg Certificate of Live Birth].&amp;quot; Originally ordered by Obama to be posted on ''WhiteHouse.gov'', but it is no longer there.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[[Donald Trump]], who had been critical of Obama for allowing the divisiveness to linger was then leading Republicans in polls for the upcoming GOP primary&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;James, F. (2011, April 15). &amp;quot;[https://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpolitics/2011/04/15/135446314/poll-donald-trump-birther-darling-leads-gop-field-at-26 Donald Trump, Birther In Chief? Poll Has Him Leading GOP Field with 26 Percent].&amp;quot; ''NPR''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and has been credited with bringing final resolution to the issue. The birth certificates of Michelle Robinson, which would disclosure her birth-sex, and the two children which would clarify their birth parentage, however, remain undisclosed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following is a synopsis of previous events leading up to the release:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton top advisor [[Sidney Blumenthal]], and his son, Max Blumenthal, were the origin of the rumors in 2008 that Barack Hussein Obama was a Muslim in order to stir up fear among white Democrats and women, intended for Hillary's benefit.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-great-islamophobic-crusade/ The Great Islamophobic Crusade], CBSNEWS, December 19, 2010.  cbsnews.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; McClatchy Washington Bureau Chief James Asher relayed, &amp;quot;Mr. Blumenthal and I met together in my office and he strongly urged me to investigate the exact place of President Obama’s birth, which he suggested was in Kenya.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article102354777.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Snope's has identified a claim that a 1991 promotional booklet by Barack Obama's then-literary agency, Acton &amp;amp; Dystel, touted Obama as &amp;quot;born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii&amp;quot; as being true.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/booklet.asp&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hillary Clinton 2008 presidential campaign|Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign]] team then began spreading [[Islamophobic]] rumors that Obama was a [[Muslim]] schooled in a ''madrassa'' as a child in Indonesia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/sep/05/bill-clinton-barack-obama-bromance-long-slow-making  Bill Clinton and Barack Obama: an alliance long and slow in the making], Gary Younge, ''Guardian'' UK.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20080506093354/http://www.stop-obama.org/?page_id=23 Who is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA?] Mission Statement, stop-obama.org&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A group registered as People United Means Action (PUMA) was made up of Hillary Clinton supporters who not only opposed Barack Obama's nomination but also sought to delegitimize his presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://youtu.be/bifsEkjTAc8&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; PUMA members charged that the media directed [[sexism]] and [[misogyny]] at Clinton during the 2008 primary campaign and expressed anger at [[Democratic Party]] leaders' failure to speak out or otherwise respond appropriately. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton had received a majority of votes in the 2008 Democratic primaries and PUMA felt the [[Superdelegate]]s robbed Hillary of the nomination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Retribution killings'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama transformed the Bush administration War on Terror from a preventative measure against terrorism to a cry for vengeance, mob bloodlust, and retribution killings which spawned a fresh, new, and larger cycle of violence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On May 1, 2011, Obama misled the public when he announced &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Obama, B. (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-dead Osama Bin Laden Dead].&amp;quot; ''White House''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf1SLhNoUNY Nobel Prize Winner with a kill list].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that Osama bin Laden was &amp;quot;killed in a firefight&amp;quot; after a U.S. special operations group infiltrated a compound in [[Abbottabad raid|Abottobad]], Pakistan.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baker, P., Cooper, H., &amp;amp; Mazzetti, M. (2011, May 1). &amp;quot;[Bin Laden is Dead, Obama Says].&amp;quot; ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Osama_Bin_Laden/ Target Bin Laden: The Death of Public Enemy #1].&amp;quot; ''ABC News''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''[[NPR]]''. &amp;quot;[https://www.npr.org/series/135908383/osama-bin-laden-dead Special Series: Osama Bin Laden Killed].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Attacks, murders, and kidnappings of Americans have since escalated as reprisals for bin Laden's death. [[Al Qaeda]], once broken and on the run, operates openly as the jihad has now become global. Relations with Pakistan, a longtime ally throughout the Cold War and War on Terror, became strained. The government of Pakistan denied White House claims it allowed Americans to kill Muslims on its territory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Associated Press'' (2011, May 10). &amp;quot;[https://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/05/10/pakistani-president-claims-bin-laden-deal/ Former Pakistani President Claims There Was Never Bin Laden Deal With U.S.].&amp;quot; Retrieved from ''Fox News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For all his duplicity and criticism of the War on Terror, Obama experienced only a temporary blip in approval ratings.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dao, J. &amp;amp; Sussman, D. (2011, May 4). &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/05/us/politics/05poll.html For Obama, Big Rise in Poll Numbers After Bin Laden Raid].&amp;quot; ''New York Times''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Pew Research Center'' (2011, May 2). &amp;quot;[https://www.people-press.org/2011/05/03/public-relieved-by-bin-ladens-death-obamas-job-approval-rises/ Public 'Relieved' by Bin Laden's Death, Obama's Job Approval Rises].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Jones, J.M. (2011, May 5). &amp;quot;[https://www.gallup.com/poll/147437/obama-approval-rallies-six-points-bin-laden-death.aspx Obama Job Approval Rallies Six Points to 52% After Bin Laden Death].&amp;quot; ''Gallup''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''[[CBS News]]/Associated Press'' (2012, May 1). &amp;quot;[https://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57424622/1-year-after-osama-bin-laden-killed-still-no-answers-from-pakistan/ 1 Year After Osama bin Laden Killed, Still No Answers from Pakistan].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An NBC investigation revealed Obama was informed of bin Laden's whereabouts one full year before he attempted to use it as an election year issue. NBC further reported that there was no &amp;quot;firefight&amp;quot; at all, contradicting what the president told the nation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3077864/NBC-investigatin-says-bama-DID-edit-role-Pakistan-killing-Bin-Laden-change-facts-credit.html NBC investigation claims Obama knew where bin Laden was ONE YEAR before 2011 raid and backs Seymour Hersh's claim Pakistan intelligence hid al-Qaeda chief], [[Daily Mail ]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; As early as the day after bin Laden was executed, it was learned bin Laden was not armed in the alleged &amp;quot;firefight&amp;quot; that Obama claimed took place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Defends Mohammad'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the [[Benghazi terrorist attack]] which his administration knowingly and fraudulently blamed on the creator of an irreverent YouTube video critical of the founder of Islam, Obama made a speech at the UN in which he said, {{Cquote|The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/25/remarks-president-un-general-assembly&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Four Americans died in the terrorist action intended to commemorate the [[9/11 attack]]s. The attack occurred on the US Consulate at Benghazi, part of the territory of the United States. Administration officials did nothing to repel the attack in progress while huddling to discuss the domestic political ramifications for the upcoming presidential election, less than two months away. The creator of the video was jailed on bogus charges unrelated to the video. In 2015, a series of terrorist attacks in France, Denmark and the United States claimed the lives of at least 15 people with dozens injured, including security and police officers, motivated by Muslim extremists defending what, in their view were, unflattering depictions of the founder of Islam, [[Mohammad]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Voting irregularities'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Stanley Kurtz - author of ''Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and the Untold Story of American Socialism'' (2010) Obama in 1995 sought and obtained the endorsement of a left-wing third party, the [[New Party]] in his quest to be elected to the Illinois State Senate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kurtz, S. (2012, June 7). [https://www.nationalreview.com/articles/302031/obamas-third-party-history-stanley-kurtz Obama's Third-Party History]. ''[[National Review Online]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's &amp;quot;Fight the Smears&amp;quot; campaign has denied this, as has [[Politico]]'s Ben Smith.&amp;lt;ref name=pollack&amp;gt;Pollack, J.B. (2012, June 7). [https://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/07/Obama-Caught-Lying-Again-He-WAS-Member-of-New-Party-Says-Kurtz Obama Caught Lying Again: He WAS Member of 'New Party', Says Kurtz]. ''Breitbart.com''&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Smith, B. (2008, October 25). [https://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/The_dread_New_Party.html The Dread New Party]. ''[[Politico]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Others who claim he was affiliated with the New Party/ACORN include [[The Blaze]]'s Billy Hallowell,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hallowell, B. (2012, June 7). [https://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-new-documents-show-obama-was-a-member-of-the-far-left-new-party/ News Docs Reportedly Show Obama Was a Member of the Far-Left 'New Party']. ''The Blaze''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Breitbart News Network|Breitbart]]'s Joel Pollack, [[Human Events]]' Erick Erickson,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Erickson, E. (2008, June 10). [http://www.humanevents.com/2008/06/10/obama-and-the-new-party/ Obama and the New Party]. ''[[Human Events]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Newsbusters' P.J. Gladnick,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gladnick, P.J. (2008, October 12). [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/10/08/will-msm-report-obama-membership-socialist-new-party#ixzz21JfE3z1z Will MSM Report on Obama Membership in Socialist New Party?] ''[[Newsbusters]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Rick Moran at AmericanThinker.com,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rick Moran. [https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/06/obamas_alliance_with_marxists.html Obama's Alliance with Marxists], ''American Thinker'', June 03, 2008.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and various writers at [[Discover the Networks]] (which include Kurtz and Erickson).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7434 NEW PARTY (NP)], ''[[Discover the Networks]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kurtz in 2012 has claimed to find minutes of the New Party Chicago chapter that say, &amp;quot;''Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He signed the New Party 'Candidate Contract' and requested an endorsement from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.''&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=pollack /&amp;gt; Obama campaign strategist David Axelrod responded to Kurtz with silence and when asked if that meant &amp;quot;yes or no&amp;quot;, Axelrod stated, &amp;quot;You can take that as I have no idea what you are talking about.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollack, J.B. (2012, June 7). [https://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/07/Exclusive-Axelrod-Plays-Dumb-on-Obama-and-Socialist-New-Party Exclusive: Axelrod Plays Dumb on Obama and Socialist New Party]. ''[[Breitbart.com]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''&amp;quot;You didn't build that&amp;quot;'''===&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|You didn't build that}}&lt;br /&gt;
On July 13, 2012, at a campaign event in [[Virginia]], Obama attacked [[capitalism]] in a speech that immediately stirred up controversy. Speaking about the government's role in the success of private business, he said:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/13/remarks-president-campaign-event-roanoke-virginia Remarks by the President at a Campaign Event in Roanoke, Virginia], White House&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help.  There was a great teacher somewhere in your life.  Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.  Somebody invested in roads and bridges.  If you’ve got a business - you didn’t build that.  Somebody else made that happen.}} The [[Romney]] campaign has used &amp;quot;If you’ve got a business—you didn’t build that&amp;quot; in ads to show America that Obama believes it is government that creates business rather than hard-working individuals. The Obama campaign has alternatively stated that the sentenced was poorly worded since he was not giving a scripted speech and that when Obama said &amp;quot;that&amp;quot; he was referring to roads and bridges. Obama points to a later portion of his speech in which he said, &amp;quot;The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together,&amp;quot; to support his claim.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Results'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On November 6, 2012 Barack Obama won reelection with 332 electoral votes to Mitt Romney's 206.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.politico.com/2012-election/results/map/ 2012 Presidential Election], Politico&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama received 51% of the popular vote (65,899,660 votes) to Romney's 47% (60,932,152 votes).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2012/2012presgeresults.pdf Official 2012 Presidential General Election Results], [[Federal Election Commission]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==2009–2017: Presidency==&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Obama administration|Biden family corruption timeline}}&lt;br /&gt;
The [[liberal claptrap]] that elected Obama seems silly today. It was claimed, for example, that Obama had millions of followers on Twitter, when allegedly some 70% of them were fake.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, David (August 24, 2012). [http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/08/obama-has-millions-of-fake-twitter-followers/1#.UDfQVqA2et_ &amp;quot;Obama has millions of fake Twitter followers&amp;quot;].  USA Today website/The Oval blog.  See [[USA Today]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  And although the [[lamestream media]] promoted Obama as a great orator, in fact, he relied almost entirely on teleprompters for his speeches and press conferences, and at one point even had teleprompters set up for him in a middle school classroom in order to speak to the media.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama and George H. W. Bush.jpg|thumb|right|300px|President Barack Obama meets with former President [[George H. W. Bush]] in the Oval Office, Feb. 15, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza).]]&lt;br /&gt;
Five years into Obama's presidency the number of people holding jobs still was 3 million below the all-time high of 138 million&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The effectiveness of [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009|Stimulus]] and deficits: [http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/fredgraph.png?graph_id=112811 Job growth under President Obama's first term;] Source: [[United States Department of Labor]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; workers – despite an increase of 10 million people in population over the same period of time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/fredgraph.png?graph_id=112809 U.S. Population growth during Obama's first four years in office.] Source: [[U.S. Census Bureau]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Despite the &amp;quot;Hope and Change&amp;quot; rhetoric, from 2007 to 2017, the rate of Americans ages 10 to 24 who died by [[suicide]] rose by 56 percent, from 6.8 deaths per 100,000 persons to 10.6.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/why-has-there-been-a-56-percent-increase-in-suicide-among-young-americans-in-just-10-years/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Under Obama and Senate Democrats&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Democrat-controlled Senate did not propose, vote on, or pass a budget for nearly five years. [https://www.cnn.com/2013/03/23/politics/senate-budget-bill/index.html Senate passes its first budget proposal in four years,] Ted Barrett and Alison Harding, CNN, March 23, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; budget management, the United States suffered its largest [[Federal budget deficit|deficit]]s&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Edwards, B. et. al. (2009, November 6). [https://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/107xx/doc10708/11-06-mbr.htm Monthly Budget Review: Fiscal Year 2009]. ''[[Congressional Budget Office]]''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Delisle, E.C. et. al. (2010, November 5). [https://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/118xx/doc11873/NovemberMBR.pdf Monthly Budget Review: Fiscal Year 2010]. ''[[Congressional Budget Office]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in history and its credit-worthiness downgraded from [[Standard and Poor's]]. Obama assured Americans that unemployment would not rise above 8% if his [[economic stimulus]] program was adopted, however, it rose and stagnated in the 8-10% range&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Di Leo, L &amp;amp; Lynch, S.N. (2010, August 20). [http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704476104575439172480870774.html Jobless Claims Jump in New Sign Recovery is Sputtering]. ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[United States Bureau of Labor Statistics]]. [https://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?data_tool=latest_numbers&amp;amp;series_id=LNS11300000&amp;amp;years_option=specific_years&amp;amp;include_graphs=true&amp;amp;to_month=1&amp;amp;from_month=2 Databases, Tables &amp;amp; Calculators by Subject: Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey]. ''[[United States Department of Labor]]''. Data extracted on: July 19, 2010 (4:31:11 PM).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; for the entirety of his first term.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patrick H. Caddell and Douglas E. Schoen, writing in the ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'', noted, &amp;quot;Rather than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided America on the basis of race, class and partisanship.&amp;quot; The commentators also note Obama's approach to governance has encouraged [[radical left]]ists to pursue a similar strategy on his behalf. Mary Frances Berry, former head of the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, acknowledged that the [[Obama administration]] has taken to polarizing America around the issue of race as a means of diverting attention from other issues, saying, &amp;quot;Having one's opponent [[race card|rebut charges of racism]] is far better than discussing [[Unemployment|joblessness]].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berry, M.F. (2010, July 20). [https://www.politico.com/arena/perm/Mary_Frances_Berry_91E3D9D5-C40D-440C-9D48-1C50CBC60C87.html Energy Arena, Driving the Conversation: Contracting Out U.S. Security? And will Branding Tea Party Racist Work?] ''[[Politico]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Caddell and Schoen, who worked for President Carter and Clinton, respectively, further stated, &amp;quot;Mr. Obama has also cynically [[class warfare|divided the country on class lines]]. He has taken to playing the populist card time and time again. He bashes Wall Street and insurance companies whenever convenient to advance his programs, yet he has been eager to accept campaign contributions and negotiate with these very same banks and [[corporation]]s behind closed doors in order to advance his political agenda... President Obama's divisive approach to governance has weakened us as a people and paralyzed our political culture.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Caddell, P.H. &amp;amp; Schoen, D.E. (2010, July 28). [http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB10001424052748703700904575391553798363586.html Our Divisive President]. ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama appointed numerous communists and [[Red diaper baby|red diaper babies]] to important administration positions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;McQuillan, Karin (June 3, 2019). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/barack-obama-populated-the-us-government-with-communists Barack Obama populated the US government with communists]. ''LifeSiteNews'' (from the ''American Thinker''). Retrieved June 4, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He abused his presidential power several times during his presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (June 12, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/06/12/pollak-joe-biden-democrats-loved-obamas-abuses-of-presidential-power/ Pollak: Joe Biden, Democrats Loved Obama’s Abuses of Presidential Power]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 12, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Domestic policy===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's economic [[stimulus]] package in response to the [[Crash of 2008]] took seven years to return [[unemployment]] to historically acceptable levels. Economic growth remained below 2.0% throughout his two terms as poverty and income inequality increased.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama sought to end the &amp;quot;schoolhouse-to-jailhouse pipeline&amp;quot; by bribing public school districts through grants for not having law enforcement authorities arrest students for arrestable offenses – this policy led to a major school shooting in Florida over a year after he left office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Richardson, Valerie (March 5, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/5/nikolas-cruz-avoided-police-scrutiny-help-obama-po/ Obama policies to end ‘schoolhouse-to-jailhouse pipeline’ helped keep Nikolas Cruz off police radar]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved March 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Sperry, Paul (March 1, 2018). [https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2018/02/28/obama_administration_school_discipline_policy_and_the_parkland_shooting.html Behind Cruz's Florida Rampage, Obama's School-Leniency Policy]. ''RealClear Investigations''. Retrieved March 5, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Evans, M. Catharine (February 26, 2018). [https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/02/how_federal_funding_kept_nikolas_cruz_from_getting_arrested_and_unable_to_purchase_firearms.html How federal funding kept Nikolas Cruz from getting arrested and unable to purchase firearms]. ''American Thinker''. Retrieved March 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under Barack Obama's lack of leadership, an Inspector General appointed by Obama discovered, for the first time in history, that the top two personnel appointed by Obama to head the [[FBI]] had both violated the law.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://sharylattkisson.com/2019/09/indicting-a-sandwich/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, the Obama Administration prosecuted more whistleblowers as spies than other administrations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mora, Edwin (October 3, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/03/flashback-obamas-war-on-whistleblowers-more-prosecuted-as-spies-than-ever-before/ Flashback–‘Obama’s War on Whistleblowers’: More Prosecuted as Spies than Ever Before]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved October 3, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Obamacare: 8 years of stagnant growth====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:CRIMINALS-600x400.jpg|right|350px|thumb|President Obama and [[Chuck Schumer]] with Democrat megadonor and convicted [[rape|rapist]] [[Harvey Weinstein]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://usbacklash.org/harvey-weinstein-caught-on-recorded-nypd-phone-sting-telling-his-sexual-assault-victim-it-wont-happen-again/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Schumer, who shepherded Obamacare through Congress, later called it a mistake.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/11/chuck-schumer-passing-obamacare-in-2010-was-a-mistake/449700/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; ]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Obamacare}}&lt;br /&gt;
Not wanting the [[Financial crisis of 2008]] &amp;quot;to go to waste,&amp;quot; America embarked on a grand socialist experiment. Thanks to &amp;quot;stupidity of the American voter&amp;quot; in the words of the bill's author, Obama passed his signature legislation, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) on March 10, 2010. Also known as Obamacare. In keeping with his progressive ideals, the bill used coercive measures to force Americans to buy insurance they didn't want or need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The employer mandate – the requirement that employers pay 50% of a workers insurance – held down new job creation and wages. Overall [[GDP]] growth barely exceeded 1% throughout Obama's years, while population continued to grow at a 2.5% rate, thus steadily impoverishing the nation as a whole.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The act originated in the Democrat-controlled House, was amended and passed the Senate just prior to Sen. [[Ted Kennedy]]'s death with no Republicans and 44 Democrats voting to oppose. 60 Democrats in total lost their seats afterward in the 2010 Midterms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In what was construed as a de facto rejection of the bill, [[Massachusetts]] voters elected a [[Republican]] candidate, [[Scott Brown]], who promised to vote against the bill if given the chance.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/scczbaciweaamvs/sqdcjqy/p1/thefix/senate/scott-brown-wins-massachusetts-senate-race.html|work=Washington Post|author=Chris Cillizza|date=January 19, 2010|title=Scott Brown wins Massachusetts Senate special election race|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  After Obama made a promise to issue an [[executive order]] that would ultimately prohibit the use of taxpayer subsidies to pay for [[abortion]] services,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sboxugoa/sjwewdpoy/p1/2010/mar/22/nation/la-na-healthcare-passage22-2010mar22/3|work=[[Los Angeles Times]]|language=English|title=House passes historic healthcare overhaul|date=March 22, 2010|author=Noam N. Levey and Janet Hook}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the Democratic [[House of Representatives]] would pass the bill as it left the Senate 219–212, with 34 Democrats and all other parties dissenting.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/swxn/sfsaszlku/p1/2010-03-21/politics/health.care.main_1_health-care-entire-house-democratic-caucus-pre-existing-conditions?_s=PM:POLITICS|date=March 21, 2010|author=Alan Silverleib|work=CNN|language=English|title=House passes health care bill on 219-212 vote}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[individual mandate]] required everyone to purchase health care insurance or suffer punitive measures, with the typical [[Marxist]] provisions for exemptions and transfer payments from taxpayers to protected classes of Democrat voters. The individual mandate was upheld by the [[Supreme Court]] with Chief Justice [[John Roberts]] – himself the victim of Obama era [[FISA abuse]] – casting the tie-breaking vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The forced transfer of wealth from job creation to healthcare (including illegal immigrants) impoverished the country and left a generation of younger Obama supporters unemployed or underemployed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Economic policy====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Keynes.jpg|thumbnail|right|190px|[[Barack Obama]] advocates the use of discredited [[Keynesian economics|Keynesian economic concepts]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2011/03/20/fabian-john-maynard-keynes-the-stealthy-enemy-of-human-freedom/ John Maynard Keynes the stealthy enemy of human freedom]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-02-22/deathbed-of-keynesian-economics-will-be-in-u-k-matthew-lynn.html Deathbed of Keynesian Economics will be in the UK]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.iwf.org/inkwell/show/23102.html Will the G8 Repudiate the Philosophy of Living Beyond Our Means?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.keynesatharvard.org/book/KeynesatHarvard-ch09.html KEYNES AT HARVARD Economic Deception as a Political Credo BY ZYGMUND DOBBS]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{see also|Obamunism|American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009}}&lt;br /&gt;
Critics of the Obama administration have coined the word &amp;quot;[[Obamunism]]&amp;quot; to describe Barack Obama's [[socialism|socialistic]] and &amp;quot;[[fascism]] light&amp;quot; [[economic planning]] policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[[Benito Mussolini]] defined fascism as the wedding of state and corporate powers.  Accordingly, trend forecaster [[Gerald Celente]] labels [[Obama administration corporate bailouts|Obama's corporate bailouts]] as being &amp;quot;fascism light&amp;quot; in nature.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/shoyazuxrvzm/srst/p1/articles/daily-intel/2009/07/20/obamunism-inc|work=The Big Money|publisher=Washington Post.[[Newsweek]] Interactive Co. LLC|language=English|title=Obamunism, Inc.|author=David Sessions|date=July 20, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sndlobjsqjkxhdorzklbov/sbcd/p1/small-business-interviews/gerald-celente-6944|author=Jim Blasingame|title=Is the government creating a bailout bubble?}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obamunism can also refer to Obama's [[Obama administration fiscal policy|ruinous fiscal policies]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|reckless monetary policies]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gerard&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sjraxnucybwxm/p2/article/120883-monetary-policynot-obama-s-stimulusis-what-needs-watching|title=Monetary Policy-Not Obama's Stimulus-Is What Needs Watching|author=Gerard Jackson|date=February 16, 2009|work=Seeking Alpha}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bam&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=[[New York Post]]|date=May 17, 2009|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/scczblb/smno/p1/seven/05172009/postopinion/editorials/bams_wise_words_169731.htm|title=BAM'S WISE WORDS}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/slxv/snqlfvftx/syhfw/p1/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/|title=Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures|work=The Foundry|publisher=[[Heritage Foundation]]|author=Conn Carroll|date=March 24, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As seen in his own actions, Barack Obama instructed his advisors to find loopholes that would enable the president to act as a [[dictator]] by pushing through legislation and increases in spending without congressional authority.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Naked Emperor News (2011, October 12). [https://www.theblaze.com/stories/executive-dictatorship-obama-instructs-advisers-to-push-through-stimulus-projects-without-pesky-congressional-authorization/ Exclusive Dictatorship: Obama Instructs Advisors to Push Through Stimulus Projects Without Pesky 'Congressional Authorization']. ''[[The Blaze]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, budgets passed under President Obama have included the smallest average annualized growth of federal spending (1.4%) since before President Reagan. Federal spending grew an average of 8.7% per year during Reagan's first term and an average of 8.1% per year during George W. Bush's second term.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sbomdbt/smno/p2/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/|title=Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?|publisher=[[Forbes]]|author=Rick Ungar|date=May 24, 2012}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Wall Street]] firms and banks that were bailed out were among Obama's biggest campaign supporters.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''OpenSecrets.org''. [https://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&amp;amp;cid=N00009638 Barack Obama: Top Contributors]. The Center for Responsive Politics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Therefore, the Obama administration bailouts of corrupt, unproductive, and reckless Wall Street firms was hardly surprising, and many argue that it was not helpful in making the United States economy more productive and prosperous by encouraging more risk taking through letting banks off with a slap on the wrist.  Others argue that bailing out the banks kept credit flowing and prevented a much deeper recession and a total collapse of the financial system.  The government will recoup some though not all of its capital infusions over time.  A 2005 study found that government corporate bailouts are often done for mere political considerations and the economic resources allocated exhibit significantly worse economic performance than resources allocated using purely business considerations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Faccio, M. et. al. (2005, March 1). [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=676905 Political Connections and Corporate Bailouts]. ''Social Science Research Network''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Proponents of [[free market]] capitalism said Bernanke should not have bailed out failing firms and instead should have allowed free market capitalism to quickly recover as it did in the depression of 1920 without government intervention (free market capitalists assert that government intervention drags out economic recessions and depressions).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Woods, T.E. (2009, April 10). [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czcUmnsprQI Why You've Never Heard of the Great Depression of 1920]. ''[[Ludwig von Mises Institute]]''. Hosted on ''YouTube''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The Obama administration has been sharply criticized for [[Obama administration deficit spending|its massive deficit spending]] and [[Obama administration monetary policy|its reckless monetary policy]] via vast increases in the [[money supply]], although inflation under Bernanke has been below the historic mean.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;gerard&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;bam&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Carroll, C. (2009, March 24). [http://blog.heritage.org/2009/03/24/bush-deficit-vs-obama-deficit-in-pictures/ Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures]. ''The Foundry''. [[Heritage Foundation|The Heritage Network]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Celente predicts that if a &amp;quot;second American Revolution&amp;quot; occurs in a peaceful and productive manner, it may include a [[Third Party System|third party movement]] of governance that will advocate a more [[free market]] [[capitalism]] approach to the American economy and a more strict interpretation of the [[United States Constitution]] as far as the authors' [[original intent]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During what the [[White House]] billed as [[Recovery Summer]], one half million workers per week continued losing their jobs. His signature legislative achievement, [[ObamaCare]],has been found to be [[unconstitutional]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schoenberg, T. &amp;amp; Fisk, M.T. (2010, December 13). [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-13/u-s-health-care-law-requirement-thrown-out-by-judge.html Obama's Health-Care Law Ruled Unconstitutional Over Insurance Requirement]. ''Bloomberg''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; by several judges and constitutional by others, and is credited as a major cause of uncertainty, high [[unemployment]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=33220 Obamacare: Unemployment You Can Believe In], [[Human Events]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; lagging job creation,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Foster, J.D. (2010, August 5). [http://blog.heritage.org/2010/08/05/it%E2%80%99s-official-medicare%E2%80%99s-finances-shadowed-by-uncertainty/ It’s Official: Medicare’s Finances Shadowed by Uncertainty]. ''The Foundry''. [[Heritage Foundation|The Heritage Network]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and risk of a credit default crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Samuelson, R.J. (2010, March 29). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/28/AR2010032802353.html With health bill, Obama has sown the seeds of a budget crisis]. ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cramer, J. (2010, March 19). [http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2010/03/19/mad-money-cramer-health-care-passage-will-topple-stock-market 'Mad Money' Cramer: Health Care Passage 'Will Topple the Stock Market']. ''[[Newsbusters]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His 2012 Budget plan has been roundly criticized in the mainstream and liberal press as not a serious effort to deal with the nation's economic crisis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.republican.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/blog?ID=1551d6f5-2ac9-4b8d-97ab-74def354024e Newspapers Call Out White House: ‘What Would That Path Be, Mr. President?’]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Jeffrey Tucker]] wrote, &amp;quot;President Obama's economic policy has been catastrophic for liberty, enterprise, and the American dream—the very archetype of what not to do to end recession.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1118186176/ref=as_li_tf_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;amp;tag=anncoulter-20&amp;amp;linkCode=as2&amp;amp;camp=1789&amp;amp;creative=9325&amp;amp;creativeASIN=1118186176 Debacle: Obama's War on Jobs and Growth and What We Can Do Now to Regain Our Future]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to conservative investigative journalist [[Peter Schweizer]], Obama weaponized the regulatory process to help his friends buy businesses that had been devalued through Obama Administration policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kraychik, Robert (March 20, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2018/03/20/smash-grab-schweizer-explains-how-obama-weaponized-regulations-enrich-buddies/ ‘Smash and Grab’: Schweizer Explains How Obama Weaponized Regulations to Enrich His Buddies]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved March 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Stimulus'''&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Black uc.png|right|250px|thumb|Black Unemployment under Barack Obama and the veto-proof Democrat congress.]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Recovery Summer}}&lt;br /&gt;
In early 2009, Obama lobbied Congress and the public to pass a sweeping Stimulus package&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, January 3). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28479998/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-urges-congress-pass-stimulus-plan/ Obama Urges Congress to Pass Stimulus Plan].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Parsons, C. &amp;amp; Nicholas, P. (2009, February 10). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28479998/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-urges-congress-pass-stimulus-plan/ Barack Obama Sternly Urges Congress to Pass Economic Stimulus].&amp;quot; ''Chicago Tribune''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; known as ''The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009'' (H.R. 1).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1: Bill Text Versions: H.R. 1].&amp;quot; 111th Congress (2009-2010). ''[[Library of Congress]]''.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=204335,00.html The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Information Center].&amp;quot; ''[[IRS]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The report of the Congressional Budget Office mandated by law stated that the legislation would ultimately harm the economy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, S. (2009, February 4). &amp;quot;[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/04/cbo-obama-stimulus-harmful-over-long-haul/ CBO: Obama Stimulus Harmful Over Long Haul].&amp;quot; ''U.S. News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Contrary to his promise of bipartisanship,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, S. (2009, March 28). &amp;quot;[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/mar/28/mccain-obama-breaks-campaign-promises-shuns-bipart/?page=all McCain: Obama Breaks Promise of Bipartisanship].&amp;quot; ''[[Washington Times]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the bill passed the House 244–188 on January 28, 2009, with 11 Democrats voting with the entire Republican caucus against,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Calmes, J. (2009, January 28). &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/politics/29obama.html House Passes Stimulus Plan With No G.O.P. Votes].&amp;quot; ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and received just 3 Republican votes when passing the Senate 61–37.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Herszenhorn, D.M. (2009, February 10). &amp;quot;[https://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/washington/11web-stim.html Senate Approves Stimulus Plan].&amp;quot; ''The New York Times''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One third of the massive $838 billion bill consisted of [[Backdoor spending authority#Backdoor tax expenditures|backdoor tax expenditures]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, February 11). &amp;quot;Senate Passes $838 Billion Stimulus Bill.&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the rest direct [[new spending]] on &amp;quot;just about every pent-up Democratic proposal of the last 40 years.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, January 28). &amp;quot;[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123310466514522309.html A 40-Year Wish List].&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In responding to criticism of the broken bipartisanship promise at the time, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously quipped, &amp;quot;We won the election. We wrote the bill.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kane, P. (2009, January 23). &amp;quot;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/22/AR2009012203961.html Stimulus Plan Meets More GOP Resistance].&amp;quot; ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On February 18, 2009, the Stimulus was signed into law by Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, February 17). &amp;quot;[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29231790/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-stimulus-lets-americans-claim-destiny/ Obama: Stimulus Lets Americans Claim Destiny].&amp;quot; ''Associated Press''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In August 2009, Republicans and Democratic Senator David Obey drew attention to mistakes on the Recovery.gov site claiming millions of Stimulus jobs created that didn't exist. Obama responded by saying the errors just indicate his accounting is an &amp;quot;inexact science&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;(2009, November 18). &amp;quot;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/18/obama-calls-stimulus-data-errors-issue-says-focus-job-growth/ Obama Calls Stimulus Data Errors 'Side Issue,' Says Focus Is on Job Growth].&amp;quot; ''[[Fox News]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''[[Sequestration]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to [[Pulitzer Prize]] winning journalist [[Bob Woodward]] of the ''[[Washington Post]]'', Obama misled the American people in a Presidential debate only two weeks before the 2012 election when he said, &amp;quot;The sequester is not something that I’ve proposed,”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-02-22/opinions/37238840_1_jack-lew-treasury-secretary-rob-nabors Obama’s sequester deal-changer,] By Bob Woodward, ''Washington Post'', February 22, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  when in fact his chief budget negotiator and current Chief of Staff, [[Jack Lew]], made a call to Democrat [[Harry Reid]] at 2:30 pm on July 27, 2011 with the proposal after clearing it with Obama,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dailycaller.com/2012/10/22/fact-check-woodward-wrote-that-obama-administration-proposed-sequester/ Fact-check: Woodward wrote that Obama administration proposed sequester]. [[The Daily Caller]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as fully documented in Woodward's book, ''The Price of Politics''. Federal Reserve Chairman [[Ben Bernanke]] warned of immediate jobloss of about 750,000 jobs – about the same level as under George W. Bush&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/fredgraph.png?graph_id=109262 Monthly Jobloss under George W. Bush, Jan 2007 - Jan 2009]. See also [http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/graph/fredgraph.png?graph_id=109266 Initial Unemployment Claims] over the same period, annualized. Source: [[U.S. Department of Labor]], Bureau of Labor Statistics.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; – if Obama's budget and economic plans were allowed to take effect.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://money.cnn.com/2013/02/26/news/economy/bernanke-burden-recovery/ Bernanke: Spending cuts add 'significant' burden to recovery,] By Annalyn Kurtz, CNN February 26, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Woodward, who's reporting on [[Watergate]] is credited with toppling the administration of [[Richard Nixon]], told Wolf Blitzer of CNN he was told by a senior White House official he'd regret talking about the President Obama's positions on the sequester.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.businessinsider.com/bob-woodward-obama-sequester-white-house-reporting-price-politics-2013-2 Bob Woodward: White House Threatened Me On Sequester,] businessinsider.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Spreading poverty and raising the debt'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the 2011 debt ceiling standoff between Obama and House Republicans,&amp;lt;ref name=Swann-Aug&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sbbzacrcqujtxiwqq/swxy/p2/servlet/BlobServer?blobheadername3=MDT-Type&amp;amp;blobcol=urldata&amp;amp;blobtable=MungoBlobs&amp;amp;blobheadervalue2=inline%3B+filename%3DUS_Downgraded_AA%2B.pdf&amp;amp;blobheadername2=Content-Disposition&amp;amp;blobheadervalue1=application%2Fpdf&amp;amp;blobkey=id&amp;amp;blobheadername1=content-type&amp;amp;blobwhere=1243942957443&amp;amp;blobheadervalue3=UTF-8 |title=United States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered to 'AA+' on Political Risks and Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative |publisher=[[Standard and Poor's]] |date=August 5, 2011 |accessdate=April 3, 2013}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the United States Government's credit rating was, for the first time in its history, downgraded from AAA to AA+, and [[poverty]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/data/incpovhlth/2009/pov09fig04.pdf Figure 4: Number in Poverty and Poverty Rate: 1959-2009]. ''[[U.S. Census Bureau]]''. Current Population Survey, 1960 to 2010 Annual Social and Economic Supplements.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; increased markedly. By and large, his programs, said to combat the recession, unemployment, slow growth, and deficits, have failed&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The vast majority (73%) of respondents reported the fiscal stimulus enacted in February 2009 has had no impact on employment to date. While 68% also believe a jobs bill, such as the one recently enacted into law, will have no impact on payrolls, 30% do believe it will boost payrolls moderately&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[https://www.nabe.com/press/ind1004.pdf Industry Survey], ''National Association for Business Economics'', April 2010, p. 2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; leaving the country saddled with an $18 trillion [[national debt]] and climbing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;During Obama's first two years in office, the rate of new U.S. federal debt added per year to its total tripled the rate of new debt accumulated by Bush to place the U.S. on a war footing, and during Obama's first six years in office, the total National Debt has nearly doubled ($7.5 trillion added).  See [[National Debt]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; One of his most well-known tactics was blaming someone else, such as George W. Bush, for all his failures instead of taking responsibility. Also on the domestic front, Obama passed an expensive [[health care]] bill in 2010 with no national consensus or [[bipartisan]] support and 34 Democrats dissenting. Recently, the [[Congressional Budget Office]] wrote an open letter to [[John Boehner]], the Speaker of the House, outlining the effects of repealing [[Obamacare]] and explaining why a net loss of over 100 billion dollars would occur from the repeal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cbo.gov/publication/43471 Letter to the Honorable John Boehner providing an estimate for H.R. 6079, the Repeal of Obamacare Act], Congressional Budget Office&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During Obama's presidency, the national debt nearly doubled, going from $10.6 trillion to $19.9 trillion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Meyer, Ali (January 21, 2018). [https://freebeacon.com/politics/obama-leaves-office-debt/ Obama Leaves Office Having Added $9.3 Trillion to Debt]. ''The Washington Free Beacon''. Retrieved May 16, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Illegal immigration====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama detention.jpg|right|300px|thumb|A U.N. report cited Obama for holding 100,000 children in cages.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://qz.com/1291470/photos-immigrant-children-detained-at-the-placement-center-in-2014/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.theepochtimes.com/media-outlets-retract-story-claiming-trump-administration-has-detained-100000-children-in-migration-related-us-detention_3151966.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama Administration was weak on [[illegal immigration]]. It established the [[Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals]] program (DACA)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Munro, Neil (July 21, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/21/daca-seven-facts-obamas-amnesty-decree/ DACA: Seven Facts About Obama’s Amnesty Decree]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nolte, John (September 5, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/immigration/2017/09/05/14-things-msm-wont-tell-daca/ 14 Things the MSM Won’t Tell You About DACA]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klein, Aaron (September 3, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/03/obama-administration-usurped-constitution-bypassed-congress-grant-de-dacto-amnesty-dreamers/ How the Obama Administration Bypassed Congress to Grant De Facto Amnesty to Young Illegal Aliens]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in 2012, which gave protection and work permits (jobs which could have gone to American citizens) to illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children. In his 2013 memoir, liberal Democrat U.S. Representative [[Luis Gutiérrez]], an ally of Obama on immigration issues, stated that Obama did not believe that DACA was legally possible until he enacted it.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (September 5, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/05/luis-gutierrez-daca-2013-obama-said-illegal/ Luis Gutiérrez on DACA in 2013: Obama Said It Was Illegal]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Obama Administration was able to give green cards to about 40,000 of those DACA illegals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Munro, Neil (September 1, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/01/daca-backdoor-granted-green-cards-45000-illegals/ 45,000 Illegals Using DACA Backdoor to Get Green Cards]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 1, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Binder, John (September 26, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/26/feds-confirm-40k-illegal-aliens-shielded-by-daca-already-given-amnesty/ Feds Confirm 40K Illegal Aliens Shielded by DACA Already Given Amnesty]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 26, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, it was reported the administration let 2.2 million deportable illegal immigrants, including 400,000 with criminal convictions, remain on the streets,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Price, Bob (April 22, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/04/22/report-ice-failures-under-obama-administration-leave-more-than-2-2-million-supervised-aliens-on-streets/ REPORT: ICE Failures Under Obama Administration Leave More Than 2.2 Million ‘Supervised’ Aliens on Streets]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; while releasing 68,000 with criminal records in 2013 alone.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mass, Warren (April 1, 2014). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/17963-obama-administration-releases-68-000-illegal-immigrant-criminals Obama Administration Releases 68,000 Illegal Immigrant Criminals]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 8, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He nearly doubled the number of illegal immigrant juveniles with the EB-4 visa, which gave them legal status.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Binder, John (May 30, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/05/30/obama-nearly-doubled-number-juvenile-illegal-aliens-given-amnesty-says-expert/ Obama Nearly Doubled Number of Juvenile Illegal Aliens Given Amnesty, Says Expert]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 30, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Administration &amp;quot;administratively closed&amp;quot; up to 200,000 deportation cases, meaning those illegal immigrants were free to go where they wanted in the U.S.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bedard, Paul (August 28, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/200000-deportation-cases-quietly-closed-under-obama/article/2632724 200,000 deportation cases quietly 'closed' under Obama]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved August 28, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The administration also obstructed deportation cases&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bedard, Paul (October 9, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/group-memo-shows-obama-team-obstructed-deportation-cases/article/2636910 Group: Memo shows Obama team obstructed deportation cases]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved October 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and blocked 550,000 illegals from deportation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bedard, Paul (December 6, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama-blocked-deportation-of-550000-illegals-more-than-atlantas-population/article/2642694 Obama blocked deportation of 550,000 illegals, more than Atlanta's population]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved December 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Obama Administration issued 140,000 U visas, which are given to illegal immigrants who testify against criminals in court and allow them to eventually gain citizenship, massively expanding the program.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Munro, Neil (June 27, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/27/u-vsa-becomes-backdoor-amnesty-for-200000-plus/ Obama Backdoor Amnesty Provided ‘U visas’ For 140,000 Illegal Aliens]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 28, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Obama Administration's failure to close an immigration loophole caused over 250,000 illegal minors to be separated from their parents,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Binder, John (June 19, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/19/immigration-loophole-separated-more-than-quarter-million-child-border-crossers-under-obama/ Obama’s Inaction on Immigration Loophole Separated More Than Quarter Million Child Border Crossers]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 19, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Spiering, Charlie (June 21, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/21/obama-criticizes-trump-for-family-separation-but-fails-to-acknowledge-role-in-child-detention/ Obama Criticizes Trump for Family Separation, but Ignores Own Record of Separating Families]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 21, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Duke, Selwyn (June 22, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/29349-obama-separated-families-and-detained-kids-media-said-nothing Obama Separated Families and Detained Kids, Media Said Nothing]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 22, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and those minors faced significantly worse conditions in their holding facilities than under the Trump Administration, which also took tougher action.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Price, Bob (June 20, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/texas/2018/06/20/trump-vs-obama-two-approaches-to-migrant-families-and-minors/ Trump vs. Obama: Two Approaches to Migrant Families and Minors]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014, President Obama announced the [[DAPA]] program, which would have expanded protections from deportation to a total of about 5 million illegal immigrants. This order was blocked by a federal judge,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/02/17/federal-judge-temporarily-blocks-obama-immigration-executive-action.html Federal judge temporarily blocks Obama's immigration executive action]. ''Fox News''. February 17, 2015. Retrieved April 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; upheld by an appeals court,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/11/09/appeals-court-rules-against-obama-immigration-plan.html Appeals court rules against Obama immigration plan]. ''Fox News''. November 10, 2015. Retrieved April 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and a split 4–4 Supreme Court ruling upheld the appeals court ruling.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;de Vogue, Ariane; Kopan, Tal (June 23, 2016). [https://www.cnn.com/2016/06/23/politics/immigration-supreme-court/ Deadlocked Supreme Court deals big blow to Obama immigration plan]. ''CNN''. Retrieved April 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under President Obama, [[Immigration and Customs Enforcement]] released 564 convicted sex offender illegal immigrants, in many cases because various countries refused to accept them back.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Price, Bob (May 22, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/05/22/obamas-ice-released-nearly-600-sex-offenders-countries-refused-deportation/ Obama’s ICE Released Nearly 600 Sex Offenders after Countries Refused Deportation]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In May 2017, a whistleblower revealed that the Obama Administration knowingly let illegal immigrant [[MS-13]] gang members into the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, Stephen (May 24, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/24/whistleblower-dhs-knowingly-let-ms-13-gang-members/ Obama admin knew gang members were part of illegal immigrant surge: Whistleblower]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved May 24, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Saavedra, Ryan (May 24, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/05/24/obama-let-admitted-ms-13-members-whistleblower-says/ Obama Let in Admitted MS-13 Members, Whistleblower Says]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 25, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In January 2018, the DHS inspector general reported that the Obama Administration did not identify and arrest terrorist aliens classified as &amp;quot;highest risk&amp;quot; due to them not being screened.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mora, Edwin (January 11, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2018/01/11/ig-obamas-ice-missed-opportunities-arrest-high-risk-terror-linked-aliens/ IG: Obama’s ICE ‘Missed Opportunities’ to Arrest High-Risk Terror-Linked Aliens]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved January 13, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harrington, Elizabeth (January 16, 2018). [https://freebeacon.com/national-security/obamas-ice-didnt-follow-procedure-for-checking-illegal-immigrants-ties-to-terrorism/ Obama’s ICE Didn’t Follow Procedure For Checking Illegal Immigrants’ Ties to Terrorism]. ''The Washington Free Beacon''. Retrieved January 16, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama Administration moved illegal migrant teens across state lines so they could have [[abortion]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Freiburger, Calvin (October 24, 2018). [https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/obama-admin-moved-illegal-immigrant-teens-across-state-lines-for-abortions Obama admin moved illegal immigrant teens across state lines for abortions, emails reveal]. ''LifeSiteNews''. Retrieved October 24, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Its policies led to an increase in illegal immigration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Munro, Neil (May 23, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/23/senate-hearing-obamas-daca-and-flores-orders-spiked-illegal-migration/ Senate Hearing: Obama’s DACA and Flores Orders Spiked Illegal Migration]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 24, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After assuming office in 2017, the [[Trump Administration]] made [[Donald Trump achievements|a large change in its policies]] towards illegal immigration compared to the Obama Administration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Llorente, Elizabeth (April 17, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/17/sessions-immigration-policies-mark-big-change-from-obama-policies.html Sessions' immigration policies mark big change from Obama policies]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved April 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Secretary of Homeland Security [[John Kelly]] of the Trump Administration strongly criticized the Obama Administration for its failures regarding illegal immigration and national security.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Munro, Neil (April 18, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/18/dhs-kelly-sacred-duty-protect-america/ DHS Kelly Slams Obama’s Policies, Proclaims ‘Sacred Duty’ To Protect America]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Mora, Edwin (April 21, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/04/21/dhs-chief-obama-nothing-truly-secure-border/ DHS Chief: Obama Did ‘Nothing’ to ‘Truly’ Secure Border]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 21, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Rising migration levels'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because of the Obama Administration's [[open borders]] policies, total migration into the U.S. in 2016 and 2017 reached record high levels, at 1.75 million people per year.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, Stephen (October 31, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/31/total-immigration-us-ties-all-time-record/ Total immigration to U.S. ties all-time record]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved November 1, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Munro, Neil (October 31, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2018/10/31/obama-migration-record-almost-one-migrant-for-every-two-graduates-in-2016/ Obama’s Migration Record: Almost One Migrant for Every Two Graduates in 2016]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved November 1, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Soft-on-crime====&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama Administration failed to act upon warnings by federal drug investigators and state officials about the growing problem of illegal fentanyl as the drug killed 70,000 people between 2013 and 2017.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SlowFentanyl&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; In fact, the administration softened its enforcement against &amp;quot;low-level nonviolent drug offenses.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;SlowFentanyl&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Llorente, Elizabeth (March 13, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obama-administration-slow-to-answer-early-alarms-about-fentanyl-report Obama administration slow to answer early alarms about fentanyl: report]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved March 13, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hayward, John (March 14, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2019/03/14/obama-administration-refused-declare-public-health-emergency-fentanyl/ Obama Administration Refused to Declare Public Health Emergency for Fentanyl]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved March 14, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====War on police====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Riots during the Obama Administration}}&lt;br /&gt;
Cop killings increased dramatically in Obama's final years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/police-killed-line-of-duty-increase-2016/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But the groundwork was laid in the early months of Obama's presidency when he made a televised statement that the police &amp;quot;acted stupidly&amp;quot;. Obama gave encouragement to [[Black Lives Matter]] and the [[Antifa]] terrorist organization.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Attacks on Christian religious freedom====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Schlafly phyllis.jpg|thumbnail|right|140px|[[Phyllis Schlafly]]'s book ''No Higher Power: Obama’s War on Religious Freedom'' documents Obama's attack on religious freedom.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.crisismagazine.com/2012/obamas-attack-on-religious-freedom-its-worse-than-you-think Obama’s Attack on Religious Freedom: It’s Worse Than You Think], ''Crises Magazine''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
When first running for office Obama angered religious conservatives with his comment about working-class voters in old industrial towns. Obama said, &amp;quot;They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/apr/14/barackobama.uselections2008 Obama angers midwest voters with guns and religion remark], The Guardian&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama administration has been widely criticized for his policies which encroach on religious freedom in areas such as: health care, freedom to dissent on matters relating to the [[homosexual agenda]], religious freedom in the military and religious freedom in other spheres of American life.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.crisismagazine.com/2012/obamas-attack-on-religious-freedom-its-worse-than-you-think Obama’s Attack on Religious Freedom: It’s Worse Than You Think], ''Crises Magazine''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://dailysignal.com/2016/01/21/obamas-hypocrisy-on-religious-freedom/ Obama’s Hypocrisy on Religious Freedom]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/15/us-military-losing-christians-because-of-hostile-c/?page=all U.S. military ‘hostile’ to Christians under Obama; morale, retention devastated], ''Washington Times''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www1.cbn.com/beltwaybuzz/archive/2015/10/08/senator-seeks-answers-from-obama-on-religious-freedom Obama and Religious Freedom], ''CBN News''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition, the Obama administration has been criticized for promoting religious freedom for [[Islam|Muslims]] and restricting religious freedom for Christians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://townhall.com/columnists/michaelbrown/2015/10/29/the-obama-administration-religious-freedoms-fro-american-muslims-not-american-christians-n2072727 The Obama Administration: Religious Freedoms for American Muslims, Not American Christians], Townhall&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Environment and energy====&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Gulf of Mexico oil spill disaster}}&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama authorized offshore oil drilling in the [[Gulf of Mexico]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0430/Gulf-of-Mexico-oil-spill-imperils-Obama-s-offshore-drilling-plan Gulf of Mexico oil spill imperils Obama's offshore drilling plan,] By Mark Clayton, ''[[Christian Science Monitor]]'', April 30, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; stating, &amp;quot;oil rigs today generally don’t cause spills&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;White House Press Release, [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-a-discussion-jobs-and-economy-charlotte-north-carolina Remarks by the President in a Discussion on Jobs and the Economy in Charlotte, North Carolina,] Office of the Press Secretary, April 02, 2010. Retrieved from whitehouse.gov 3 May 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and was widely criticized for his mishandling of the &amp;quot;[[Gulf oil spill disaster|worst environmental disaster]] in US history.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.examiner.com/x-33986-Political-Spin-Examiner~y2010m4d29-Worst-environmental-disaster-in-US-history-Oil-slick-in-Gulf-of-Mexico-is-set-on-fire Worst environmental disaster in US history,] Maryann Tobin, ''Examiner'', April 29, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/the-oil-spill-is-obamas-fault/ Conscience of a Liberal: The Oil Spill Is Obama’s Fault,] Paul Krugman, ''The New York Times'', April 30, 2010.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Administration spend vast sums of taxpayer money on futile environmentalist efforts, including $4.1 million on a study that attempted to find a connection between pollution and obesity.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bleau, Hannah (June 15, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/06/15/report-obama-administration-spent-over-4-million-on-study-aimed-to-link-pollution-to-childhood-obesity/ Report: Obama Administration Spent over $4 Million on Study Aimed to Link Pollution to Childhood Obesity]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 16, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama Administration enacted many environmental regulations and used scientific studies to back up the supposed need for the regulations, but after the [[Trump Administration]] began undoing the Obama-era rules, many of the merits of the studies were found to be dubious.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lucas, Fred (December 26, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/26/junk-science-studies-behind-obama-regulations-under-fire.html 'Junk science'? Studies behind Obama regulations under fire]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved December 26, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Labor law====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's first act of office was to sign the [[Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act (2009)|Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act]] – effectively nullifying the [[Supreme Court]] case ''Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &amp;amp; Rubber Co.'', which ruled that Ledbetter had to have filed a pay [[discrimination]] suit within 180 days of the first time Ledbetter was paid less than her male peers;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sboxugmc/snop/p2/2009/01/30/us/politics/30ledbetter-web.html|work=The New York Times|language=English|title=Obama Signs Equal-Pay Legislation|author=Sheryl Gay Stolberg|date=January 29, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the law made corporations subject to suit within 180 days of each time the employee was unfairly paid.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sfkwpawu/sjoxh/spfpv/p1/grossman/20090213.html?=features|work=FindLaw|author=Joanna L. Grossman|date=Feb. 13, 2009|language=English|title=The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''9/11 responders'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On January 2, 2011, Obama signed the James Zadroga [[9/11]] Healthcare and Compensation Act.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/slxv/sliyi/sklm/p2/articles/wnyc-news/2011/jan/02/obama-signs-zadroga-act-law/|publisher=New York Public Radio|title=Obama Signs Zadroga Act into Law|author=Fred Mogul|date=January 2, 2011|work=wNYC|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The act, which afforded 9/11 first responders who were sickened by the dust from the collapse of the [[World Trade Center]] health care and compensation, passed [[Congress]] after its sponsors agreed to scale down the pricing from 7.4 to 4.2 billion dollars.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/slxv/sliyi/sklm/p2/articles/wnyc-news/2010/dec/22/zadroga-911-bill-passes-senate/|publisher=New York Public Radio|work=wNYC|language=English|title=Congress Approves 9/11 Health Bill|date=December 22, 2010}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Diversity over safety'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the Obama Administration, the [[Federal Aviation Administration]] issued new hiring rules for air traffic controllers which placed achieving diversity over ensuring that new employees were talented, educated, and even knew what they were doing.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/02/obama-era-faa-hiring-rules-place-diversity-ahead-airline-safety-attorney-tells-tucker-carlson.html Obama-era FAA hiring rules place diversity ahead of airline safety, attorney tells Tucker Carlson]. ''Fox News''. June 2, 2018. Retrieved June 6, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Duke, Selwyn (June 5, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/29215-danger-in-the-skies-obama-dumbed-down-air-traffic-controllers-with-diversity-rules Danger in the Skies: Obama Dumbed-down Air-traffic Controllers With “Diversity” Rules]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 6, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Haverluck, Michael F. (June 3, 2018). [https://www.onenewsnow.com/politics-govt/2018/06/03/obama-put-diversity-over-safety-at-faa Obama put diversity over safety at FAA]. ''OneNewsNow''. Retrieved June 6, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Poor, Jeff (June 2, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/06/02/aviation-attorney-to-tucker-carlson-faa-is-putting-diversity-ahead-of-safety/ Aviation Attorney to Tucker Carlson: FAA Is Putting Diversity Ahead of Safety]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 6, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Meeting with an atheist group====&lt;br /&gt;
:''See also:'' [[Atheism and American politics]]&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama administration became the first administration to met with an [[Atheism|atheist]] group. It met with the Secularism Coalition for America which is a coalition which represents the [[American Atheists]], the American [[Secular Humanism|Humanist]] Association, and the Military Association of Atheists and [[Freethought|Freethinkers]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to the ''USA Today'', the group met with the White House officials to &amp;quot;discuss problems that they believe are fueled by religion.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;content.usatoday.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://content.usatoday.com/communities/Religion/post/2010/02/atheists-meet-with-white-house-officials/1#.VypYTzEn_7Y Atheists meet with White House officials], USA Today&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Among the issues the group discussed were the issues of &amp;quot;military proselytizing&amp;quot; by [[evangelicalism|evangelical]] Christian members of the military and faith-based initiatives&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;content.usatoday.com&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Gender politics====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Don't Ask Don't Tell}}&lt;br /&gt;
Candidate Obama promised to repeal a policy that originated with President Clinton and passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress that prohibited inquiries into military personnel's [[sexual orientation]] while barring openly gay [[homosexuals]] from serving in the military. [[Liberals]] expressed anger when time passed and no effort to repeal the law was seen;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sboxugbdjxfbbnwt/svwx/p2/news/2008/nov/21/obama-to-delay-repeal-of-dont-ask-dont-tell/|work=[[Washington Times]]|title=Obama to delay ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ repeal|language=English|author=Rowan Scarborough|date=November 21, 2008}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; in fact, Obama's [[justice department]], as part of their duty to defend all laws passed by any administration, filed a brief arguing against the [[Supreme Court]] granting a [[writ of certiorari]] to a gay soldier challenging the law (the writ was not granted). In response, the soldier, James Pietrangelo II, a former Army infantryman and lawyer, said, &amp;quot;(Obama's) a coward, a bigot and a pathological liar. This is a guy who spent more time picking out his dog, Bo, and playing with him on the White House lawn than he has working for equality for gay people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|work=[[Time Magazine]]|publisher=Time Inc.|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/snwtf/sklm/p1/time/nation/article/0,8599,1903545,00.html?imw=Y|title=Dismay Over Obama's 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Turnabout|author=Mark Thompson|date=Jun. 09, 2009}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 15, 2010, a bill was introduced in the [[House of Representatives]] to repeal the law – it passed a day later by a vote of 250–175;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/saun/sncfau/szhvdv/p1/evs/2010/roll638.xml|title=FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 638|work=Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; it passed the Senate three days later 65–31.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/saun/sndlzrg/smno/p2/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&amp;amp;session=2&amp;amp;vote=00281|work=The U.S. Senate|title=U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress - 2nd Session|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama signed the Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010 on December 22.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g dadt&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/spa/swl/symvrgqly/sqrs/p1/world/2010/dec/22/obama-repeals-dont-ask-dont-tell|work=[[The Guardian]]|language=English|title='Don't ask, don't tell' repealed as Obama signs landmark law|date=22 December 2010}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[Pentagon]] itself could not immediately implement the repeal and questioned whether it would hurt combat readiness.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;g dadt&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the day Rev. [[Jim Jones]] left for [[Jonestown]], [[Harvey Milk]] wrote to Jones and said &amp;quot;my name is cut into stone in support of you - and your people.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://books.google.com/books?id=24taDwAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PT254&amp;amp;lpg=PT254&amp;amp;dq=%22my+name+is+cut+into+stone+in+support+of+you+-+and+your+people.%22&amp;amp;source=bl&amp;amp;ots=ynq76x7v9F&amp;amp;sig=ACfU3U1baSHsO8-hnZ5MVbDiNeBbUn9TbQ&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;sa=X&amp;amp;ved=2ahUKEwiz8vLNi6XgAhWG1IMKHfWVCZQQ6AEwB3oECAcQAQ#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22my%20name%20is%20cut%20into%20stone%20in%20support%20of%20you%20-%20and%20your%20people.%22&amp;amp;f=false Harvey Milk: His Lives and Death], Lillian Faderman, Yale University Press, May 22, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; President Obama honored Milk posthumously with the [[Presidential Medal of Freedom]] on the anniversary on his death.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvKOv8HA76o President Obama Honors Harvey Milk With Presidential Medal of Freedom], youtube.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Civil service corruption and the revolving door====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama criticized the &amp;quot;revolving door&amp;quot; of government and business.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;We need to close the revolving door that lets lobbyists come into government freely, and lets them use their time in public service as a way to promote their own interests over the interests of the American people when they leave.&amp;quot; [https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-welcoming-senior-staff-and-cabinet-secretaries-white-house REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT IN WELCOMING SENIOR STAFF AND CABINET SECRETARIES TO THE WHITE HOUSE,] January 21, 2009. [[White House]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After appointing [[Peter Orszag]] his first Budget Director to dole out the stimulus cash, Orszag resigned to become Citigroup's Vice Chairman of Global Banking. Citigroup was the recipient of $476 billion in [[bailout]] money - more than any other bank - after the disastrous [[Financial crisis of 2008]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2011/03/citibank_received_more_bailout.html Citigroup Received More Bailout Money Than Any Other Bank,] By Nitasha Tiku, 3/16/11.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Before the bailout, Orszag's expert opinion of the chances of a mortgage meltdown was 1 in 500,000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.pierrelemieux.org/stiglitzrisk.pdf Implications of the New Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Risk-based Capital Standard,] by Joseph E. Stiglitz, Jonathan M. Orszag and Peter R. Orszag. Fannie Mae Papers, Volume 1, Issue 2, March 2002, Conclusion p.6.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign policy===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Obama and the media.jpg|right|250px|thumb|[[Ben Rhodes]] is the Assistant to the President for Strategic Communications and Speechwriting, and Deputy National Security Advisor to [[Susan Rice]]. Rhodes is also the brother of David Rhodes, President of CBS News.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Obama launched a global anti-Christian jihad with his support for [[al-Qaeda]] and the [[Islamic State]] to overthrow the governments of Libya and Syria. The Black African [[slave trade]] was revived in Libya after Obama removed [[Muammar Gaddafi]], an ally in the [[War on Terror]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://womensenews.org/story/international-policyunited-nations/150527/un-sex-violence-envoy-focusing-syria-iraq UN Sex Violence Envoy: Focusing on Syria, Iraq]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2009/06/barack-obamas-top-10-apologies-how-the-president-has-humiliated-a-superpower Barack Obama's Top 10 Apologies: How the President Has Humiliated a Superpower], Heritage Foundation&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama, who was raised a Muslim&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2007/01/was_obama_blood.html Was Obama bloodied by madrassa story?]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.danielpipes.org/11952/obama-muslim-childhood Obama's Muslim Childhood]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and is not a descendant of slaves, criticized Christians and the Crusades as reports of thousands of women and girls being captured, sold, and raped flooded in.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/579393/ISIS-Michelle-Obama-prostitute-justifies-raping-slave-girls-Koran ISIS calls Michelle Obama a PROSTITUTE and justifies raping slave girls with the KORAN]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obamas-speech-at-prayer-breakfast-called-offensive-to-christians/2015/02/05/6a15a240-ad50-11e4-ad71-7b9eba0f87d6_story.html Critics pounce after Obama talks Crusades, slavery at prayer breakfast], Washington Post&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, Obama overemphasized political correctness in U.S. national security policy, something disliked by CIA officials.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dorman, Sam (November 5, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/media/book-cia-staff-obama-white-house CIA staff complained about Obama White House's political correctness, new book claims]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved November 5, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The number of jihadis worldwide has grown by a factor of 4 or 5 at least, since Obama took the reins of power as Commander-in-Chief.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The number of Islamic extremists susceptible to jihadist recruitment during the George W. Bush administration worldwide was estimated at 12,000; the Islamic State alone by 2015 had estimates of a standing army of jihadis as high as 70,000 to 200,000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Remarkably, the ''[[New York Times]]'' was critical of Obama's incessant boasting about the killing of [[Osama bin Laden|bin Laden]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Baker, Peter and Shear, Michael D. (April 27, 2012). [https://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/28/us/politics/critics-pounce-on-obamas-trumpeting-of-bin-laden-death.html &amp;quot;Obama trumpets killing of Bin Laden, and critics pounce&amp;quot;]. ''The New York Times'' website. See [[The New York Times]].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  With the complete disengagement of American troops from [[Iraq]] and the assassination of [[Osama bin Laden]], the [[Islamic State]] arose and recruitment of global [[jihad]]is multiplied exponentially. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama entered his second term mocking and ridiculing the idea that Russia was America's prime geo-strategic competitor; by the closing days of his presidency, Obama was in a panic fanning the flames of a Third Red Scare. Vladimir Putin and Russia had thoroughly embarrassed Barack Obama on the world stage as Obama withdrew America from its traditional role of global leadership and repudiated the idea of [[American exceptionalism]]. Respect for America degenerated in the world as issues such as transexual bathrooms occupied more of Obama's time and attention than the 12 million homeless refugees Obama had driven from their homes in his failed &amp;quot;[[Arab Spring]]&amp;quot; policy. Having been thoroughly rebuked politically with the election of Donald Trump, as a [[lameduck]] Obama attempted to coverup [[DNC]] scandals uncovered by [[Wikileaks]] by scapegoating Vladimir Putin and fostering an atmosphere of paranoia about Russia, the future, and a Trump presidency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Commander-in-chief'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Senator, Obama was highly critical of President Bush and promised change. As President, Obama tripled down in Afghanistan, widened the war into Pakistan, multiplied by drone attacks, bombed Yemen and Somalia, and started an undeclared NATO war in Libya. On presidential war powers, surveillance questions, Guantanamo, detention policy and habeas corpus, Obama similarly stayed the course or expanded Bush's precedents. In a speech on May 19, 2011, Obama fully embraced the [[Bush Doctrine]] of preventative war.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Krauthammer, C. (April 19). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-news-in-obamas-speech/2011/05/19/AF4dFN7G_story.html The News in Obama's Speech]. ''Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From the Boston Globe:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'The New America Foundation, which tracks the strikes, has listed 23 raids since the beginning of April 2011, all but one in Pakistan’s tribal regions of North and South Waziristan. A June 20 attack was reported in Kurram, an area north of North Waziristan along the Afghanistan border.'&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'The drone program has become increasingly controversial as the Obama administration has expanded its use beyond the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Lethal missiles have been launched from unmanned aircraft in at least five countries in addition to Pakistan: Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, and, most recently, Somalia. The military’s Joint Special Operations Command used a drone last June to attack what officials said were two senior members of the Al Shabab militant group on the Somali coast.'  &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;DeYoung, K. (2011, July 4).  [http://www.boston.com/news/world/asia/articles/2011/07/04/cia_halts_drone_launches_from_pakistan_base/ CIA Halts Drone Launches From Pakistan Base]. ''[[The Boston Globe]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A commentator says:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
'Obama is commendable when he says he wants to avoid war. His policies, however, favor war by destabilizing the Middle East making it extremely hostile and favoring radical Islam over America’s ally, Israel, and American interests in the region... The president has chosen a very dangerous path for every American and one that promises great difficulty for Israel.' &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thejerusalemconnection.us/blog/2012/03/14/obamas-words-disguise-his-israel-foreign-policy-actions.html Obama's words disguise his Israel foreign policy actions.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By Obama's third year as Commander-in-Chief, over 1200 American troops died in Iraq and Afghanistan - significantly more than the number who died during President [[George W. Bush]]'s term of office.  And growing numbers of civilian contractors also have fallen. In the first half of 2010, 250 contractors reportedly died in Iraq and Afghanistan - more than the 235 military personnel who fell during the same period.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/05/24/114662/what-price-war.html#ixzz1Nz07pg5O&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''National Defense'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama signed into U.S. law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), only after his administration successfully lobbied to remove language from the bill that would have protected American citizens from being detained indefinitely without trial.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Aaron Dykes. [http://www.infowars.com/president-obamas-ndaa-signing-statement-i-have-the-power-to-detain-americans-but-i-wont/ Obama’s Signing Statement on NDAA: I have the power to detain Americans… but I won’t], Infowars.com, January 1, 2012.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After the legislation cleared Congress, the ACLU commented that if President Obama signed the bill it &amp;quot;will damage both his legacy and American’s reputation for upholding the rule of law,&amp;quot; while executive director of the ''Human Rights Watch'' blasted the President for being ‘on the wrong side of history,’ noting that &amp;quot;Obama will go down in history as the president who enshrined indefinite detention without trial in US law.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;President Decides to Sign Ill-Conceived National Defense Authorization Act. [https://www.hrw.org/news/2011/12/14/us-refusal-veto-detainee-bill-historic-tragedy-rights US: Refusal to Veto Detainee Bill A Historic Tragedy for Rights], ''[[Human Rights Watch]]'', December 14, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.aclu.org/national-security/white-house-backs-away-defense-bill-veto-threat White House Backs Away from Defense Bill Veto Threat], ''[[ACLU]]'', December 14, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Section 1031 of the NDAA bill, which itself defines the entirety of the United States as a “battlefield,” allows American citizens to be snatched from the streets, carted off to a foreign detention camp and held indefinitely without trial. As reported by Infowars.com, the bill states that “any person who has committed a belligerent act” faces indefinite detention, but no trial or evidence has to be presented, the White House merely needs to make the accusation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Paul Joseph Watson. [http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-demanded-power-to-indefinitely-detain-u-s-citizens/ Obama Administration Demanded Power To Indefinitely Detain U.S. Citizens], Infowars.com, December 12, 2011.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;S.1867 [http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:2:./temp/~c1122VN0Iv:e548990: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Engrossed in Senate &amp;amp;#91;Passed Senate&amp;amp;#93; - ES)], ''[[Library of Congress]]'' THOMAS, 112th Congress (2011-2011), Accessed January 25, 2012.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Text of S.1867 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012. [http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s1867/text?version=es&amp;amp;nid=t0:es:281 Sec. 1031. Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force.], [[U.S. Congress]], ''OpenCongress.org'', (Accessed January 25, 2012).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Obama Administration accidentally allowed the chipmaker AMD to ship sensitive and important technology to China, despite the significant national security risks.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;O'Keeffe, Kate; Spegele, Brian (June 27, 2019). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-tried-to-stop-china-acquiring-world-class-chips-china-got-them-anyway-11561646798 How a Big U.S. Chip Maker Gave China the ‘Keys to the Kingdom’]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved June 29, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Escalates Afghan conflict'''&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Afghanistan War}}&lt;br /&gt;
American deaths in [[Afghanistan]] more than doubled in Obama's first few years compared with the preceding eight years of George Bush &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chesser, S.G. (2012, July 12). [http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R41084.pdf Afghanistan Casualties: Military Forces and Civilians - CRS Report for Congress]. Pg. 3. ''Congressional Research Service'''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as he increased troop strength for no discernible purpose and to &amp;quot;win&amp;quot; unstated objectives.  Against his own Defense Secretary's advice, Obama [[Libyan uprising 2011|attacked Libya]] and forced [[regime change]] without Congressional authorization in violation of the post-Nixon era reform measure, the [[War Powers Act]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After he took personal credit for killing [[Osama bin Laden]], the [[U.S. State Department]] warned of increased risk to the lives and safety of Americans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''KABC-TV/DT'' (2011, July 27). [http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/national_world&amp;amp;id=8273909 Risk of anti-US violence up after Osama bin Laden's death]. On ''ABC7 News''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bin Laden's successor, [[Ayman al-Zawahiri]] confirmed the [[Benghazi Attack]] which took place on the anniversary of 9/11 and killed more Americans, was motivated by al-Qaeda's desire for revenge.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cnn.com/2012/09/12/world/africa/libya-attack-jihadists/index.html Pro-al Qaeda group seen behind deadly Benghazi attack], By Nic Robertson, Paul Cruickshank and Tim Lister, CNN, September 13, 2012.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Bin Laden's death, as Obama's advisers warned, freed up jihadis who swore an oath of allegiance to the 9/11 mastermind to swear allegiance to rival and competing factions. The competing factions advocated the immediate establishment of the Islamic State, rather than after the overthrow of the Saudi monarchy and retaking of Mecca. As was well known, bin Laden always held a controversial and minority position among jihadis on the strategy for global jihad by attacking the United States first.  Bin Laden's killing, intended as an election year gimmick, brought Obama no improvement in approval ratings and spawned unprecedented growth in global terror and jihadi recruiting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama needlessly escalated troop strength&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pbs&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/slxv/sbla/sjkl/p2/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamaswar/themes/strategy.html#ixzz1LhWNImZp|title=Obama's New Strategy (March '09)|author=George Packer, Seth Jones, David Kilcullen, Rory Stewart, Andrew Exum, Col. Andrew Bacevich (Ret.)|work=[[PBS]]|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and defense costs in Afghanistan from $43.5 billion in George Bush's last year to $113.7 billion for 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Congressional Research Service, quoted in Gregory Anthony, ''What price war?''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Adviser to General [[Stanley McChrystal]] David Kilcullen wrote, &amp;quot;One of the big strategic shifts is the use of language now which talks about Pakistan and Afghanistan as the same theater. Now we talked about Af-Pak long before the Obama administration came about, but the public use of that term, and the description of it as the Afghanistan-Pakistan campaign, sends a new message to people about how the administration is going to think about Afghanistan and Pakistan.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;pbs&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Libya and rebirth of the slave trade====&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Libyan uprising 2011}}&lt;br /&gt;
In February 2011, the political unrest that spread through the Arab world showed up as protests in Libya. Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, leader of Libya for 41 years, responded to the violence&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28376.htm There Was No Libyan Peaceful Protest, Just Murderous Gangs and Nic Robertson]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; with legitimate steps.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt libya&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/sboxugmc/sjubjjp/p1/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/libya/index.html|work=The New York Times|publisher=The New York Times Inc.|language=English|title=Libya — Protests and Revolt (2011)}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The [[United Nations Security Council]] voted to impose [[sanctions]], and later passed a resolution to protect civilians. Obama, without approval from Congress and over the objections of his own National Security staff,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/gates-libyan-no-fly-zone-means-attacking-libya/ Gates: Libyan no-fly zone means attacking Libya], CBS News&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; directed American forces to take out Libya's air defense system.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;nyt libya&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Secretary of Defence [[Robert Gates]], National Security Adviser Tom Donilon, Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, and [[White House]] counterterrorism chief [[John O. Brennan]] all opposed the action. Obama later said, &amp;quot;if we waited one more day Benghazi, a city nearly the size of Charlotte, could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Barack Obama|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/slxv/sazy/sjkl/p2/2011/03/28/134935452/obamas-speech-on-libya-a-responsibility-to-act|title=Obama's Speech On Libya: 'A Responsibility To Act'|date=March 28, 2011|publisher=National Public Radio ([[NPR]])|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Alan J. Kuperman]], in an editorial for the ''[[Boston Globe]]'', suggested this statement was false, writing, &amp;quot;intervention did not prevent genocide, because no such bloodbath was in the offing. To the contrary, by emboldening rebellion, US interference has prolonged Libya’s civil war and the resultant suffering of innocents.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuperman&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Alan J. Kuperman|work=The Boston Globe|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/swyeebp/sivdvconx/p2/2011-04-14/bostonglobe/29418371_1_rebel-stronghold-civilians-rebel-positions|title=False pretense for war in Libya?|date=April 14, 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Kuperman, a professor of public affairs at the [[University of Texas]] who authored a book called ''The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention'', further stated that the rebels had tricked the world into thinking a bloodbath was at hand and that Obama had lied to the American people in order to act on this theory.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;kuperman&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gaddafi [never] threaten[ed] civilian massacre in Benghazi, as Obama alleged. The “no mercy’’ warning, of March 17, targeted rebels only, as reported by ''The New York Times'', which noted that Libya’s leader promised amnesty for those “who throw their weapons away.’’ Gaddafi even offered the rebels an escape route and open border to Egypt, to avoid a fight “to the bitter end.’’ &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://politicalcartel.org/2011/04/17/libya-and-the-obama-doctrine/ Libya and the “Obama Doctrine”.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Gaddafi wrote to Obama and told him he bore no ill will. &amp;quot;We have been hurt more morally than physically because of what had happened against us in both deeds and words by you,&amp;quot; he wrote. &amp;quot;Despite all this you will always remain our son whatever happened. We still pray that you continue to be president of the USA. We endeavour and hope that you will gain victory in the new election campaign.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/06/gaddafi-obama-nato-libya?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487 Gaddafi begs Obama to halt 'unjust war' ], [[The Guardian ]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Syria and Obama's &amp;quot;red line&amp;quot;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2012, during the [[Syrian Civil War]], President Obama stated that if the Syrian dictator, President [[Bashar al-Assad]] used [[chemical weapon]]s against Syrians, that would be unacceptable and cross a red line. However, after it was confirmed that Assad did use weapons against his people, Obama did practically nothing. He went to Congress to authorize a military strike, but this request was rejected (he had the ability to order a military strike without Congress's approval). Later, the Obama Administration (particularly [[Susan Rice]])&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RiceTakesHeat&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Chakraborty, Barnini (April 7, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/07/susan-rice-obama-colleagues-take-heat-for-past-claims-on-syria-chemical-weapons-purge.html Susan Rice, Obama colleagues take heat for past claims on Syria chemical weapons purge]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved April 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and the mainstream media&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Nash, Charlie (April 7, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/04/07/politifact-pulls-2014-mostly-true-rating-of-john-kerrys-claim-of-eliminating-syrian-chemical-weapons/ PolitiFact Pulls 2014 ‘Mostly True’ Rating of John Kerry’s Claim of Eliminating Syrian Chemical Weapons]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; claimed they had worked with Syria to remove its chemical weapons. In April 2017, Syria again used chemical weapons against its people, proving their claim wrong.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;RiceTakesHeat&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; The new president, [[Donald Trump]], unlike Obama, quickly ordered a large airstrike against a Syrian airbase.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Griffin, Jennifer; Tomlinson, Lucas (April 7, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/04/07/us-missiles-target-syria-airfield-in-response-to-chemical-weapons-attack.html US missiles target Syria airfield in response to chemical weapons attack]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved April 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Turkey'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
President Obama attempted to overthrow the legitimate government of Turkey, a vital NATO ally. Turkish President [[Recep Erdoğan]] repeatedly warned Obama's support of [[Kurd]]ish forces and [[ISIL]] threatened the NATO alliance. Turkey slowly began establishing closer ties with Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Hillary Clinton and the FBI's collusion with Russia====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Uranium One bribery scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
Obama and his administration had a weak stance on Russia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (July 22, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/07/22/pollak-media-let-obama-alums-off-the-hook-on-russia/ Pollak: Media Let Obama Alums off the Hook on Russia]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 22, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He and Secretary of State [[Hillary Clinton]] tried to &amp;quot;reset&amp;quot; relations with Russia, and he mocked [[Mitt Romney]] for calling Russia the most dangerous geopolitical threat to the U.S. in a 2012 debate. According to Brett Bruen, the White House director of global engagement from 2013 to 2015, the Obama Administration ignored his warnings about Russia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Morton, Victor (March 26, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/mar/26/brett-bruen-obama-official-says-nsc-slept-his-2014/ Obama official says NSC slept on his 2014 Russia warning]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved March 26, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama criticized president of [[Russia]], [[Vladimir Putin]] for carrying out a referendum for the seizure of [[Crimea]] to Russia.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-calls-rethinking-crimea-vote Obama calls for a 'rethinking' on Crimea vote]. [[Cybercast News Service]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After taking office in 2017, [[Donald Trump]] took several actions against Russia that Obama never went so far as to do.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berger, Judson (December 26, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/12/26/trump-administration-ends-2017-confronting-russia-after-year-collusion-accusations.html Trump administration ends 2017 confronting Russia after year of collusion accusations]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved December 26, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Cuba'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During his presidency, Obama instituted a major détente with the oppressive Communist dictatorship of [[Cuba]], despite its failed leftist governance and human rights violations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wsj.com/articles/obamas-cuban-detente-1418862551 Obama’s Cuban Detente]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. December 17, 2014. Retrieved January 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Spetalnick, Matt; Gardner, Timothy (December 13, 2016). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-cuba-whitehouse-idUSKBN1422U6 Obama to press Trump to preserve Cuba detente: White House]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved January 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In August 2015, the U.S. and Cuba reopened each other's embassies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Frumin, Aliyah (July 1, 2015). [http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/obama-announces-historic-deal-cuba Obama announces historic deal with Cuba]. ''MSNBC''. Retrieved January 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/08/14/kerry-in-havana-for-reopening-us-embassy-tough-negotiations-ahead.html Kerry marks opening of US Embassy in Havana, critics rip 'diplomacy for show']. ''Fox News''. August 14, 2015. Retrieved January 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In September 2016, Obama nominated the first U.S. Ambassador to Cuba in 55 years.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/27/obama-nominates-first-us-ambassador-to-cuba-in-more-than-45-years.html Obama nominates first US ambassador to Cuba in more than 55 years]. ''Fox News''. September 27, 2016. Retrieved January 15, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama did everything in his power to normalize relations with the failed dictatorship, but the [[United States embargo against Cuba|U.S. embargo against Cuba]] remained in place due to opposition from the Republican-controlled Congress.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Spetalnick, Matt; Marsh, Sarah (October 14, 2016). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cuba-usa-idUSKBN12E1H3 Obama eases restrictions on Cuba, lifts limits on rum and cigars]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved January 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; No one knows the extent of underground bunkers of Soviet-era weapons consisting of [[AK-47]]s and [[MANPAD]]S stockpiled between 1959–1986 when the collective stated foreign policy aims of Cuba and the Soviet Union were armed revolution and violent overthrow of the United States government and the capitalist system. The United States remains unprepared for trade talks and lifting travel restrictions on tourists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite Obama's support for mass immigration and amnesty for those who immigrated illegally, he ended the &amp;quot;wet foot, dry foot&amp;quot; policy that allowed Cuban refugees to legally stay in the U.S.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/12/obama-reportedly-to-scrap-wet-foot-dry-foot-policy-for-cuban-refugees.html Obama announces end to 'wet foot, dry foot' policy for Cuban refugees]. ''Fox News''. January 12, 2017. Retrieved January 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Liberal mainstream media regarded Obama's private meetings with the murderous thugs who run Cuba as a breakthrough in relations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Guantanamo Bay'''&lt;br /&gt;
{{main article|Guantanamo Bay}}&lt;br /&gt;
One of Obama's campaign promises was that he would close the American detention center at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba - detainees would be flown to other countries while the ones awaiting trial would enter the American court system. Two days after taking office he signed an order directing the military to do so.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;salon&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/swywmf/slmn/p2/news/politics/war_room/2011/04/25/obama_guantanamo_rhetoric|work=Salon|title=The Obama/Gitmo timeline|author=Natasha Lennard|language=English}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; But, in November 2009 Obama admitted that his self-imposed deadline of January 2010 would be missed, and in March 2011 the president went back on his campaign promise, signing an executive order to create a formal system of indefinite detention for the prisoners.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;salon&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama ultimately failed to close Guantanamo Bay, although he continually attempted to reduce the number of detained terrorists held at the base, even in the last days of his presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Saxena, V. (January 6, 2017). [http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-to-release-18-hardened-gitmo-terrorists-before-leaving-office/ Obama To Release 18 Hardened Gitmo Terrorists Before Leaving Office]. ''Western Journalism''. Retrieved January 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Ryan, Missy; Tate, Julie (December 28, 2016). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/with-final-detainee-transfer-obamas-guantanamo-policy-takes-its-last-breath/2016/12/28/dfdf8cb2-cd0f-11e6-a747-d03044780a02_story.html?utm_term=.62bebcb1f672 With final detainee transfer, Obama’s Guantanamo policy takes its last breath]. ''The Washington Post''. Retrieved January 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Anti-Israel policies====&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has had very poor relations with the conservative [[Israel]]i Prime Minister [[Benjamin Netanyahu]], and he disregarded U.S. commitments to the country.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klein, Aaron (May 9, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018/05/09/klein-obama-accuses-trump-flouting-agreements-ex-prez-just-betraying-israel/ Klein: Obama Accuses Trump Of ‘Flouting’ Agreements, But Ex-Prez Did Just That By Betraying Israel]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 9, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During the very tight and closely-watched 2015 elections, the Obama Administration attempted to influence the election—in order to elect a pro-Hamas leftist government in the nation and defeat Netanyahu—by financing a liberal pro-Palestinian political organization.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Klein, Aaron (July 13, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2016/07/13/israeli-lawmakers-fume-obama-administration-intervention-defeat-netanyahu/ Israeli Lawmakers Fume Over Obama Administration ‘Intervention’ to Defeat Netanyahu]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved December 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Netanyahu decisively won the election, despite opposition from left-wing world leaders such as Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-claims-victory-as-vote-count-shows-likud-further-ahead/ Netanyahu scores crushing victory in Israeli elections]. ''The Times of Israel''. March 18, 2015. Retrieved December 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On December 23, 2016, Obama broke over 35 years of American policy by abstaining from a UN vote and allowing a blatantly anti-Israel resolution to pass, showing his true anti-Israel stance.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;StrikeAgain&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FedUpDrastic&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; On December 28, 2016, just a few weeks before the [[Trump Administration]] was to take office and a few days after the anti-[[Israel]] resolution was adopted, Kerry gave a major 72-minute&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hanchett, Ian (December 28, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/12/28/nbcs-neely-kerry-speech-firing-a-flare-across-israel-he-wanted-to-give-it-for-some-time-but-wh-blocked-it/ NBC’s Neely: Kerry Speech ‘Firing a Flare’ ‘Across Israel’ He Wanted To Give It ‘For Some Time’ But WH Blocked It]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved December 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; speech viciously attacking Israel and paying worthless lip-service to American &amp;quot;support&amp;quot; for the nation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (December 28, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/12/28/kerry-on-israel-peace-un-resolution/ Kerry Attacks Israeli Government, Defends UN Resolution]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved December 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Israeli Prime Minister [[Benjamin Netanyahu]] responded harshly but appropriately to the Administration's blatant betrayal.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Key, Pam (December 28, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/12/28/netanyahu-i-must-express-my-deep-disappointment-with-john-kerry-israelis-do-not-need-to-be-lectured/ Netanyahu: ‘I Must Express My Deep Disappointment’ With Kerry — ‘Israelis Do Not Need To Be Lectured’]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved December 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite these actions, the U.S. House passed a motion on January 5, 2017, condemning Obama's allowing of the UN resolution.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/05/house-overwhelmingly-votes-to-condemn-un-resolution-on-israel-settlements.html House overwhelmingly votes to condemn UN resolution on Israel settlements]. ''Fox News''. January 5, 2017. Retrieved January 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cortellessa, Eric (January 6, 2017). [https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-house-passes-repudiation-of-un-security-council-resolution-on-israel/ US House passes motion repudiating UN resolution on Israel]. ''The Times of Israel''. Retrieved January 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Additionally, Republican President-elect [[Donald Trump]] voiced strong support for Israel during this time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (December 23, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/23/trump-hints-defunding-un-anti-israel-vote/ Trump on UN Anti-Israel Vote: ‘Things Will Be Different After Jan. 20’]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved January 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Swoyer, Alex (December 29, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/29/trump-im-very-very-strong-on-israel/ Trump: ‘I’m Very, Very Strong on Israel’]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved January 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Soon before leaving office, Obama bypassed Congress and gave the [[State of Palestine]] $221 million.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;221MLastHours&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/24/us-quietly-sent-221m-to-palestinians-in-obamas-last-hours.html US quietly sent $221M to Palestinians in Obama's last hours]. ''Fox News''. January 24, 2017. Retrieved January 24, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Pro-Iranian policies====&lt;br /&gt;
In contrast to his anti-Israel policies, Obama took a friendly stance toward Iran, helping negotiate the [[Iran nuclear deal]] with the country, something Obama's successor, President Trump, chose to reverse. The Obama Administration actively worked to give Iran access to American banks, and Iran got $150,000,000,000 from Obama, and they gave it to terrorists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Taylor, Guy (June 6, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jun/6/obama-hid-efforts-to-aid-irans-windfall/ Obama hid efforts to aid Iran's windfall]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 6, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.onenewsnow.com/ap/politics/report-obama-administration-lied-about-iran-deal Report: Obama administration lied about Iran deal]. ''OneNewsNow'' (from the ''Associated Press''). June 6, 2018. Retrieved June 6, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Edson, Rich (June 6, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/06/obama-administration-allegedly-gave-iran-access-to-us-financial-system.html Obama administration allegedly gave Iran access to US financial system]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 8, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; According to a high-ranking Iranian official in 2018, the Obama Administration granted U.S. citizenship to 2,500 Iranians during the nuclear deal negotiations, including the friends and family of Iranian government leaders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Irvine, Chris (July 2, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/02/obama-administration-granted-citizenship-to-2500-iranians-during-nuclear-deal-iran-official.html Obama administration granted citizenship to 2,500 Iranians during nuclear deal: Iran official]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved July 2, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An Iranian militia leader who led an attack on the U.S. embassy in Iraq in 2019 had been invited to the White House by the Obama Administration in 2011.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Nolan, Lucas (December 31, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2019/12/31/iranian-militia-leader-who-led-raid-u-s-embassy-baghdad-previously-visited-obama-white-house/ Iranian Militia Leader Leading Iraq U.S. Embassy Raid Listed as Obama White House Guest]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 31, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Singman, Brooke (January 2, 2020). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/iraqi-official-spotted-outside-embassy-attack-visited-obama-white-house-in-2011 Iraqi official spotted outside embassy attack visited Obama White House in 2011]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved January 2, 2020.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dibble, Madison (January 2, 2020). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/obama-gave-white-house-welcome-to-iran-backed-leader-of-us-embassy-attack-in-baghdad Obama gave White House welcome to Iran-backed leader of US Embassy attack in Baghdad]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved January 2, 2020.&lt;br /&gt;
*Boyer, Dave (January 2, 2020). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/2/hadi-al-amiri-leader-us-embassy-siege-iraq-was-gue/ Leader of U.S. Embassy siege in Iraq was guest of Obama at White House]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 2, 2020.&lt;br /&gt;
*Boyer, Dave (January 3, 2020). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/3/chief-of-iran-backed-embassy-siege-met-with-obama-/ Chief of Iran-backed embassy siege met with Obama, Biden]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved January 3, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Opposition to U.S. sovereignty====&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|War on Sovereignty}}&lt;br /&gt;
Preferring international cooperation and equality to American [[sovereignty]] and independence (despite the U.S.'s obviously superior geopolitical position), Obama intentionally reduced American power and strength during his presidency. One of his actions as president was to give up the nation's control of [[Domain name|internet domain name system]] and transfer control over to an international organization in 2016.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Solomon, Howard (October 3, 2016). [https://www.itworldcanada.com/article/new-era-in-internet-governance-starts-as-us-cedes-control-of-domain-name-system/386903 New era in Internet governance starts as US cedes control of domain name system]. ''IT World Canada''. Retrieved October 14, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lieberman, Eric (September 24, 2016). [https://dailycaller.com/2016/09/24/obama-admin-wants-to-surrender-us-control-over-internet-to-global-bureaucracy/ Obama Admin Wants To Surrender US Control Over Internet To Global Bureaucracy]. ''The Daily Caller''. Retrieved October 14, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama also entered the U.S. into the [[Paris climate agreement]] and attempted to have it join the [[Trans-Pacific Partnership]], which was under negotiation. Both of these agreements would have reduced American sovereignty and [[self-governance]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama also endorsed the United Nations 2030 Agenda in 2015, which called for &amp;quot;a 'new universal agenda' for all of humanity&amp;quot; and served as a major step toward a [[one-world government]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hohmann, Leo (September 30, 2015). [https://www.wnd.com/2015/09/obama-puts-u-s-on-fast-track-to-world-government/ Obama puts U.S. on 'fast track' to world government]. ''WND''. Retrieved December 26, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Congressional relations===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama has maintained tense relations with Congress throughout his term as president.  Each of his budgets was voted down, and many of his judicial appointments have not come to a vote.  When Supreme Court Justice [[Antonin Scalia]] died on February 13, 2016, Obama made a point of addressing the nation to say that he would nominate a replacement, which drew criticism and rebuke from Republican Senators and Presidential candidates.  Obama executive action in areas such as immigration policy drew extensive criticism as infringing upon Congressional legislative powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scandals===&lt;br /&gt;
Obama turned the [[Justice Department]] into a cesspool of corruption.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&amp;amp;sl=auto&amp;amp;tl=en&amp;amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nymagazin.com%2Fen_US%2Fobamagate-si-reforma-fbi-ului-tiberiu-dianu%2F]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama was complicit in the whitewash of Hillary Clinton's email investigation. In fact, Obama himself crafted the language of &amp;quot;careless,&amp;quot; reducing the charge of gross negligence punishable by 10 years in prison down to nothing. Obama himself had much to hide; he knew of Hillary's illegal email server. Obama communicated with Hillary on her illegal server at least 30 times, including from the territory of a &amp;quot;hostile foreign power,&amp;quot; presumably Russia, where their communication was most certainly hacked. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the disgraced Obama appointee as FBI director whitewashed the incident by saying Hillary communicated with &amp;quot;a senior government official,&amp;quot; it was Obama himself and his complicity in the reckless handling of classified information that Comey was covering up, not just Hillary. Over the course of his presidency, Obama cost taxpayers $35 million to cover his Christmas vacations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harper, Jennifer (December 23, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/dec/23/inside-the-beltway-aloha-the-35-million-obama-chri/ Memories of Christmas past: The $35 million Obama travel bill]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved December 24, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; FBI deputy director [[Andrew McCabe]]'s special counsel [[Lisa Page]] 's sworn congressional testimony confirms that the FBI was acting on orders from the Obama Justice Department to clear Hillary Clinton of [[felon]]ious behavior and violations of the Espionage Act so that she could be nominated as the DNC 2016 presidential candidate.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2019/03/13/lisa-page-obama-doj-ordered-fbi-not-to-charge-hillary-clinton-no-collusion/ Former FBI Lawyer Lisa Page Said Obama DOJ Ordered FBI Not To Charge Hillary Clinton], [[CBS]], March 13, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Fast and Furious====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Eric Holder.jpg|right|thumb|200px|[[Eric Holder]] is the First Attorney General in US history held in [[criminal]] [[Contempt of Congress]]. He resigned in light of the Fast &amp;amp; Furious revelations&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.americanthinker.com/2011/10/fast_and_furious_in_a_rotten_nutshell.html#ixzz27iRBCN28 Fast and Furious in a Rotten Nutshell], Ronald Kolb, ''[[American Thinker]]'', October 7, 2011,&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and other scandals.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article:'' '''[[Operation Fast and Furious]]'''&lt;br /&gt;
:{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Year !! Mexican drug related gun murders skyrocket &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;during Obama's Fast and Furious campaign&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/RyT8w&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2006 || 62 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2007 || 2,837&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2008 || 6,844&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2009 || 11,753 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2010 || 19,546&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2011 || 24,068&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2012 || 18,061 (by October 31, 2012)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2013 || 23,640 killed in 2013 (through to March 2014)&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Before Obama's Fast and Furious operation was exposed, the number of dead victims in drug cartel violence has been estimated as high as 160,000 deaths.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The ''Washington Post'' reported that White House officials stopped a requirement for gun dealers to report bulk sales of high-powered semiautomatic rifles commonly used by illegal drug cartels.  [[Justice Department]] officials had asked for White House approval to require thousands of gun dealers along the border to report the purchases to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and Explosives. ATF investigators expected to get leads on suspected arms traffickers. Senior law enforcement sources said the proposal from the ATF was held up by then White House chief of staff [[Rahm Emanuel]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Horwitz, S. &amp;amp; Grimaldi, J.V. (2010, December 17). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/17/AR2010121706598.html White House Delayed Rule Meant to Stop Gun Flow to Mexico]. ''The Washington Post''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gun dealers had been required for decades to report the sales of multiple handguns to the ATF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====IRS scandal====&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|IRS scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Aid to Benghazi rebels====&lt;br /&gt;
A March 29, 2011 article in the ''[[Washington Post]]'' included these paragraphs:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|&amp;quot;It’s almost a certitude that at least part” of the Libyan opposition includes members of al-Qaeda, said Bruce Riedel, a former senior CIA analyst and adviser to President Obama. Riedel said that anti-Gaddafi elements in the rebel stronghold of Benghazi have had “very close associations with al-Qaeda” dating back years....I would hope that we now have a good sense of the opposition in Libya and can say that this is 2 percent, not 20 percent,” Riedel said. “If we don’t, then we are running the risk of helping to bring to power a regime that could be very dangerous.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/libyan-opposition-includes-a-small-number-of-al-qaeda-fighters-us-officials-say/2011/03/29/AFRlXWyB_story.html Libyan opposition includes a small number of al-Qaeda fighters, U.S. officials say], Washington Post&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mass beheading of Christians in Libya.jpg|right|350px|thumb|Gadaffi was an ally of the US against the jihadis until Obama armed the jihadis to overthrow Gadaffi. One of their first acts was the mass beheading of Christians.]]&lt;br /&gt;
This set off a fierce debate in the [[Obama administration]] over the wisdom of arming terrorists.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/30/world/africa/30diplo.html?_r=1&amp;amp;partner=rss&amp;amp;emc=rss Washington in Fierce Debate on Arming Libyan Rebels], The New York Times&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is now known sometime prior to March 31, 2011,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/africa/31intel.html?_r=2&amp;amp;hp C.I.A. Agents in Libya Aid Airstrikes and Meet Rebels], The New York Times&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; at the urging of Hillary Clinton&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/19/world/africa/19policy.html?_r=3&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp; Obama Takes Hard Line With Libya After Shift by Clinton], The New York Times&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and over the objections of his National Security Council, Obama signed a Presidential Finding authorizing support for the rebel jihadis.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/30/us-libya-usa-order-idUSTRE72T6H220110330 Exclusive: Obama authorizes secret help for Libya rebels], [[Reuters]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By October 2011, [[Libyan rebel fighting group]]s with support from [[NATO]] overtook the capital and toppled the government. Gaddafi was captured and brutally and sadistically murdered.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPzeLLL9V-c Leading from behind - a critique of Obama foreign policy]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The jihadis were immediately recognized by the U.S. and the U.N. as the new legitimate government. Mustafa Abdul-Jalil, chairman of the National Transitional Council, announced [[Sharia]] will be the source for all legislation and all laws conflicting with Sharia are null and void.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Sharia&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8861608/Libya-Al-Qaeda-flag-flown-above-Benghazi-courthouse.html Libya: Al Qaeda flag flown above Benghazi courthouse] - [[Daily Telegraph]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Abdel Rahim al-Kib, the country's interim prime minister, echoed Jalil's words days later.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.presstv.ir/detail/207953.html New Libyan PM backs Islamic sharia law]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The al Qaeda flag was flown above the Benghazi courthouse, and reports surfaced that the Libyan jihadis had imposed Sharia law in some parts of the country even earlier.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Sharia&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; By February 17, 2013, four foreign nationals were arrested for distributing Christian literature, a charge that could carry the death penalty.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/17/libya-arrests-suspected-foreign-missionaries Libya arrests foreign 'missionaries' Four foreign nationals accused of distributing Christian literature] a charge that could carry the death penalty, Chris Stephen [[The Guardian]], Sunday 17 February 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014, the Obama Administration gave a $200,000 grant to a Sudanese group with ties to [[Al Qaeda]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pappas, Alex (July 27, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/27/obama-administration-approved-200g-grant-to-group-with-al-qaeda-ties.html Obama administration approved $200G grant to group with Al Qaeda ties]. 'Fox News''. Retrieved July 27, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kirkwood, R. Cort (July 28, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/29656-obama-administration-funded-al-qaida-front Obama Administration Funded al-Qaida Front]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 28, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Benghazi massacre====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Benghazi attack.jpg|right|250px|thumb|Amb. Stevens was specifically in Benghazi to oversee and facilitate transfer of captured weapons from the Gadaffi regime to groups in Syria which ultimately became the [[Islamic State]]. Few people had knowledge of this program beyond Stevens, Clinton, and Obama. Once the mission was completed, Stevens was expendable.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.amazon.com/REAL-Benghazi-Story-White-Hillary/dp/1531817130&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{main|Benghazi Attack}}&lt;br /&gt;
With several U.S. embassies besieged on the anniversary of the [[September 11 attacks]], White House Press Secretary [[Jay Carney]] declared there was no reason to believe the attack on the sovereign territory of the United States consulate in Benghazi, less than two months before the [[2012 Presidential election]] which killed Americans, was a terrorist attack.&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|The unrest that we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims, find offensive.}}&lt;br /&gt;
This became the official White House line. Between laughs with [[Jon Stewart]] on [[Comedy Central]], Obama said the death of Americans was &amp;quot;not optimal&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/18/Obama-Benghazi-murders-not-optimal Interview with Jon Stewart of the ''Daily Show''], Breitbart.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; When pressed by reporters, who pointed out evidence that the violence in Benghazi was a terrorist attack, Press Secretary Carney argued “the unrest around the region has been in response to this video.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Leading suspected jihadis in the murders and terrorist attack were the local Benghazi branch of Ansar al-Shariah, known to have ties to al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20121023114113/http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2012/10/19/when-an-obama-adviser-called-benghazi-an-al-qaeda-hotbed/?cxntfid=blogs_political_insider_jim_galloway When an Obama adviser called Benghazi an al-Qaeda hotbed]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; A commander of the terrorist group boasted jovially about the attack over drinks with reporters for the ''New York Times'' in Benghazi.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/16/world/africa/election-year-stakes-overshadow-nuances-of-benghazi-investigation.html?pagewanted=2&amp;amp;ref=world Election-Year Stakes Overshadow Nuances of Libya Investigation], The New York Times&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/10/frappe-libya-attack/ Frappe-Sipping Libyan Militant Laughs at U.S. Manhunt for Benghazi Killers], [[Wired (magazine)]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Funding the Islamic State====&lt;br /&gt;
Two more Americans were killed, along with 35 others, after being taken hostage by rebel jihadists in Mali shortly after the Libyan upheaval.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://world.time.com/2013/01/21/algeria-37-foreigner-hostages-killed-in-attack/ Algeria: 37 Foreigner Hostages Killed in Attack], Associated Press, Jan. 21, 2013. ''[[Time Magazine]]''.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hillary Clinton testified before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee in the wake of the Benghazi murders  under her stewardship, that weapons and fighters equipped by the Obama administration made their way to [[Mali]] and [[Algeria]]:&lt;br /&gt;
{{cquote|There is no doubt that the Algerian terrorists had weapons from Libya. There is no doubt that the Malian remnants of AQIM [Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb] have weapons from Libya.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-says-militants-used-weapons-libya-algeria-attack-154222664.html Clinton says militants used weapons from Libya in Algeria attack] [[Reuters]], Jan 23, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====1MDB scandal====&lt;br /&gt;
After the 2012 election, Obama's chief fundraiser continued raising money for Democratic candidates. [[Frank White, Jr.]] and [[Pras Michel]] formed a joint venture with [[1Malaysian Development Berhad]] (1MDB), wholly owned by the Malaysian government. The venture supposedly was to invest in green technology and solar panels, but corrupt officials of 1MDB were more interested in buying influence with the [[Obama administration]] and the [[Democratic party]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.wsj.com/articles/suspect-malaysian-fund-tied-to-lobbying-of-white-house-1476403764 Malaysian Fund 1MDB Linked to White House Visit], By Bradley Hope and Colleen McCain Nelson, ''[[Wall Street Journal]]'', Oct. 13, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and White and Pras likewise were not interested in providing a renewable source of electricity or solving the problems of [[poverty]] for Malaysia's 30 million people.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Malaysians have a median household income of $4500, so the theft of $4.5 Billion by [[globalism|globalists]] pushing green technology and Democrats looking for foreign money to finance their campaigns cause they can't sell their ideas at home, had a devastating impact on the Malaysian people, economy, and political culture.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hunter-Obama-1024x717.png|right|300px|thumb|Hunter Biden meeting with President Obama in the Oval Office.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''Official White House Photograph'']]&lt;br /&gt;
White and Pras got two anonymous investors to lend a half of a Trillion dollars for a little over a two-year period. They formed a joint partnership agreement with 1MDB to build a green technology solar plant. White and Pras owned 49%, 1MDB controlled 51%. White was supposed to have provided financial advice. His advice turned out to be for 1MBD to buy out his 49% for $69 million six months after the agreement was signed, without White's entities investing any of the half Trillion he borrowed.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The crucial evidence from the records available (illustrated above) shows that the Private Equity fund Yurus, set up by White, registered the entire US$69 million it received from 1MDB as additional profit, implying it had not invested any of its original US$505 million fund in the venture.&amp;quot; [https://medium.com/@sarawakreport/1mdb-sleaze-casts-shadow-over-us-democrats-on-eve-of-obama-visit-investigation-1MDB Sleaze Casts Shadow Over US Democrats On Eve Of Obama Visit], ''Sarawak Report'', 15 November 2015.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Portions of the $69 million were then donated to Democrat Senate, Congressional, and Gubernatorial candidates. The $69 million Democrats stole from the people of Malaysia during the Obama presidency is only a fraction of the corrupt deals 1MDB did all over the planet. Much of the $4.5 Billion embezzled was laundered through U.S. banks, and has become the largest investigation ever under the Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Act.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-loretta-e-lynch-delivers-remarks-press-conference-announcing-significant&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Biden-Ukraine scandal====&lt;br /&gt;
Vice President [[Joe Biden]] oversaw the disbursement of $1 billion allocated by the U.S. to the new government of Ukraine. In 2014, Biden's son [[Hunter Biden]], was appointed to the board of directors of Burisma Holdings, the largest oil and gas company in Ukraine. Hunter Biden was hired by [[Mykola Zlochevsky]], who served as Ukraine's ecology minister in the previous administration. Hunter Biden was paid $166,000 per month. The money was split with the nephew of [[Whitey Bulger]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zlochevsky came under investigation by the new administration for alleged embezzlement of $5 billion while ecology minister. The prosecutor traced payments made to Hunter Biden. Vice President Biden threatened the new Ukrainian administration to withhold $1 billion in U.S. allocated funds unless the prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden was fired.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/09/world/europe/corruption-ukraine-joe-biden-son-hunter-biden-ties.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Biden bragged about having caused the firing of the [[Ukraine]] prosecutor to a [[CFR]] conference.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Joe Biden at CFR meeting 2018 2.jpeg|left|300px|thumb|Biden at the [[Council on Foreign Relations]]: &amp;quot;‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money'...Well, [SOB], he got fired.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://haciendapublishing.com/articles/deep-dark-secrets-rich-famous-and-powerful-cliff-kincaid&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. banking records show Hunter Biden's firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners LLC, received regular transfers — usually more than $166,000 a month — from Burisma from spring 2014 through fall 2015, during a period when Joe Biden was the main U.S. official dealing with Ukraine. Biden threatened Ukrainian President [[Petro Poroshenko]] that the [[Obama administration]] would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending Ukraine toward insolvency, if it didn't immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin who was investigating his son, Hunter. Biden recounted, {{quotebox|&amp;quot;'You’re not getting the billion'. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money'...Well, [SOB], he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;thehill.com&amp;quot;&amp;gt;https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/436816-joe-bidens-2020-ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cfr.org/event/foreign-affairs-issue-launch-former-vice-president-joe-biden&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Yuriy Lutsenko, who replaced Shokin as the prosecutor looking into Burisma, said the evidence in the Burisma case he'd like to present to [[William Barr]], particularly the vice president's intervention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between April 2014 and October 2015, more than $3 million was paid out by Burisma to an account linked to Biden's and Devon Archer's Rosemont Seneca firm, according to the financial records placed in a federal court file in Manhattan in another case against Archer. The bank records show that, on most months when Burisma money flowed, two wire transfers of $83,333.33 each were sent to the Rosemont Seneca–connected account on the same day. The same Rosemont Seneca–linked account typically then paid Hunter Biden one or more payments ranging from $5,000 to $25,000 each. Ukrainian prosecutors reviewed internal company documents and wanted to interview Hunter Biden and Archer about why they had received such payments, but couldn't because of Joe Biden's intervention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On September 4, 2019, former Prosecutor General [[Victor Shokin]] made a sworn affidavit outlining Joe Biden's shakedown.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.scribd.com/document/427618359/Shokin-Statement&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Spygate====&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:170509-andrew-mccabe-ac-1043p c043e7050b32e4ad26bd45b92eb651eb.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg|right|275px|thumb|McCabe (left) with co-conspirator Attn. Gen. [[Loretta Lynch]] (right). McCabe took $700,000 from a Clinton campaign operative to fix the email investigation and save Hillary's nomination. Lynch colluded with Bill Clinton at the Phoenix tarmac meeting to whitewash Hillary's email investigation and meddle in 2016 election.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Obamagate timeline|FBI scandal|FISA abuse|Crossfire Hurricane|Biden-Ukraine scandal}}&lt;br /&gt;
In the Obama-era political surveillance programs, the lines between the CIA and FBI were blurred. They wworked together through contractors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/25/president-obamas-2016-political-surveillance-coverup-had-two-parallel-tracks/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The Obama administration had been conducting illegal surveillance on American citizens since 2012, shortly after the IRS scandal was exposed. On March 9, 2016, the [[NSA]] FISA compliance officer discovered the illegal collusion between the FBI and CIA to spy on American citizens. Between March and July 2016, the CIA used foreign intelligence allies in [[Italy]], the [[U.K.]] and [[Australia]] to create an illusion of Russian involvement with the Trump campaign.  This operation was based on earlier more innocuous contacts from various countries, weaponized and redeployed in what everyone calls “spygate”.  This track successfully culminated with the start of the FBI's Operation Crossfire Hurricane.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/03/08/doj-political-surveillance-from-the-irs-in-2011-to-the-fisa-court-in-2016/ DOJ Political Surveillance – From the IRS in 2011 to the FISA Court in 2016], Posted on March 8, 2020 by sundance. theconservativetreehouse.com&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On July 31, 2016 FBI deputy head of the [[counterintelligence]] division [[Peter Strzok]] began an investigation into [[Donald Trump]]. Two days later Strzok had this exchange with [[Lisa Page]], an attorney in FBI deputy director [[Andy McCabe]]'s office: {{Quotebox|'''Lisa Page – He’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Strzok - No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.'''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--Strzok – OMG did you hear what Trump just said?--&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
On September 2, 2016, Lisa Page wrote about preparing talking points for Dir. [[Jimmy Comey]] because “[[POTUS|potus]] [Obama] wants to know everything we’re doing.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theblacksphere.net/2018/02/fbi-text-message-potus-wants-know-everything/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The text raised questions about the extent of Obama's personal involvement in on ongoing the FBI investigation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/fbi-texts-obama-wants-know-everything-we-re-doing-n845531&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Susan Rice]] sent an email to herself about a secret [[Oval Office]] meeting where the ''[[Clinton-Steele dossier]]'' was discussed;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/donald-trump-intelligence-report-russia/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://apnews.com/152579d488a740b2a8d39fbe2f34506d&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://apnews.com/a82309544e9e465fa2ad4f83e5a48540&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (the email was written and sent to herself 15 minutes after Trump was sworn in on Jan. 20):&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/news-releases/grassley-graham-uncover-unusual-email-sent-susan-rice-herself-president-trump-s&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; {{Quotebox|&amp;quot;On January 5, following a briefing by [[IC]] leadership on Russian hacking during the 2016 Presidential election, [[President Obama]] had a brief follow-on conversation with FBI Director [[Jim Comey]] and Deputy Attorney General [[Sally Yates]] in the Oval Office. [[Vice President Biden]] and I were also present.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities &amp;quot;by the book&amp;quot;. The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[Redacted section]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-02-08%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Rice%20(Russia%20Investigation%20Email).pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}[[File:112 2016 b4-napo-comey-hoove8201 c0-389-1420-1216 s885x516 (1).jpg|right|300px|thumb|[[Jimmy the Weasel]] beside [[J. Edgar Hoover]]. Under Obama the FBI returned to the use of sexual innuendo and domestic spying on political opponents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/19/comey-trump-cnn-news-hook/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]At the conclusion of the briefing, Obama asked Sally Yates and James Comey to remain. Together with Susan Rice, is where the “by the book” CYA comment comes into play. The 90-day surveillance period under the FISA warrant had just a bit over two weeks left to run — it was set to expire just as Trump was to take office. (Reporting suggests that there may also have been a [[FISA]] warrant on [[Paul Manafort]] around this time.) The Obama administration was confronting a deadline if the FISA warrant was to be renewed while Obama was still in power. The officials in the meeting needed to figure out how the investigation could continue despite the fact that its central focus, Trump, was about to be sworn in as president. Rice's “by the book” bunkum is transparent: Obama officials claimed to adhere to a book that forbade consultations between political leaders and investigators. But here they were consulting. So Rice tried to cover their tracks in her email: She revises history such that the consultation morphs into a mere friendly reminder that Obama wanted everything done by the book.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/susan-rice-email-president-obama-russia-investigation/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Russia collusion hoax]] was predicated on the unverified premise that [[Wikileaks]]  was a front for [[KGB]] activity. Nonetheless, Obama commuted the sentence of [[Chelsea Manning]] who passed [[national security]] secrets to WikiLeaks two days before Obama left office.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On March 4, 2017, after becoming president, Trump tweeted:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my &amp;quot;wires tapped&amp;quot; in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Members of the mainstream media called this wiretapping claim an &amp;quot;astonishing and reckless accusation&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref name=wiretap&amp;gt;{{cite news|url=https://server5.kproxy.com/servlet/redirect.srv/sruj/scczbaciweaamvs/suvw/p2/opinions/the-trump-experiment-may-come-to-an-early-tipping-point/2017/03/05/87d38b3a-0055-11e7-99b4-9e613afeb09f_story.html?utm_term=.edb071c61986|title=The Trump Experiment may come to an early tipping point|first=EJ|last=Dionne Jr.|work=Washington Post|date=March 5, 2017|accessdate=March 5, 2017}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was later all found to be true and accurate. Nixon resigned over attempting to spy on the opposition party at the [[Watergate]] hotel; Obama got away with it on scale no one could ever imagine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Final Mueller report====&lt;br /&gt;
According to ''[[USA Today]]'', &amp;quot;[[Obama]] blew it big time&amp;quot; in regards to Russian efforts to meddle in the [[2016 presidential election]]. Mueller's final report flatly states that [[Russia]] began interfering in American democracy in 2014.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2019/04/18/mueller-report-collusion-trump-russian-election-interference-democrats-takeaways-column/3505946002/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Over the next couple of years, the effort blossomed into an attempt to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. The [[Obama administration]] knew this and did nothing. [[National Security Advisor]] [[Susan Rice]] told her staff to &amp;quot;stand down&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;knock it off&amp;quot; against the Russians.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.yahoo.com/news/stand-obama-team-blew-response-russian-meddling-100024634.html?soc_src=hl-viewer&amp;amp;amp;soc_trk=tw&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/03/why-the-hell-are-we-standing-down/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama was singularly focused on the nuclear deal with Iran. Obama wanted [[Vladimir Putin]] in the deal, and to stand up to him on election interference would have, in Obama's estimation, upset that negotiation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://edition.cnn.com/2019/04/19/opinions/mueller-report-obama-jennings/index.html?no-st=1555716010&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to DCWhispers {{quotebox|Obama had his hands all over this attempted [[coup]] of a duly elected [[President of the United States]]. The reasons for that are likely many, but perhaps a foundational reason is this—Barack Obama has never considered himself to be one required to follow U.S. law. He has always been inclined to see himself as a person of the world, not of a single nation and a single nation’s laws. Some have argued he is openly defiant of said laws, thinking them a byproduct of a deeply flawed America of which he has little if any loyalty toward. Donald Trump’s “America First” agenda is the antithesis of Obama’s “America Bad” world view and he could not abide seeing his legacy of relegating the United States to secondary world status overtaken by an outsider who was not beholden to the rules of the elite political class in D.C.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And so, Mr. Obama once again weaponized the federal government in an attempt to destroy a political opponent. The fact this was a shocking violation of the law meant little because all of America’s laws mean so little to the now former president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://dcwhispers.com/report-dirty-dealings-of-dirt-devils-who-concocted-trump-russia-probe/#SHCy4bth9xbL6Ifx.99&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Pardons and commutations===&lt;br /&gt;
According to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, President Obama issued 1,928 grants of clemency, with 1,716 being commutations, more than any other U.S. president.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bedard, Paul (September 5, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama-broke-the-record-for-commuting-jail-sentences-1716/article/2633400 Obama broke the record for commuting jail sentences, 1,716]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 6, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama pardoned [[Chelsea Manning]] who allegedly [[collude]]d with [[Julian Assange]] of [[Wikileaks]], who allegedly colluded with Russia to interfere in the [[2016 presidential election]]. Manning was pardoned four days before Obama left office as the Russia collusion investigation was getting under way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Controversies===&lt;br /&gt;
:''Main article: [[Barack Obama Controversies]]''&lt;br /&gt;
Several major controversies have dogged Obama throughout his political career and have received major media coverage and prominence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Obamaisms'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama's bizarre gaffes, or [[Obamaisms]], were frequent and embarrassing, but typically unreported by the [[liberal media]]. Some examples are: spelling respect as R-S-P-E-C-T when he was attempting to sing that line from [[Aretha Franklin]]'s famous song, spelling Ohio as O-I-H-O, and saying that we built the Intercontinental Railroad instead of the Transcontinental Railroad, saying &amp;quot;How's it going, Sunshine&amp;quot; when he was in the city of Sunrise, Florida.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kurtzman, Daniel (March 6, 2014 or aft.) [https://politicalhumor.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama-isms.htm &amp;quot;Obamaisms: Dumb quotes and gaffes by Barack Obama&amp;quot;].  About.com website/About entertainment/Political humor/Funny political jokes/Political gaffes.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Many hardworking American businessmen took offense to a 2012 campaign speech about the economy where, referring to infrastructure improvements, he said &amp;quot;[[You didn't build that]].&amp;quot; Obama offended [[Poland]] by referring to the [[Nazi]] death camps there as &amp;quot;Polish death camps.&amp;quot; Later Obama apologized.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sink, Justin (June 1, 2012). [https://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/europe/230419-obama-letter-says-he-regrets-polish-death-camp-gaffe &amp;quot;Obama apologizes in writing for 'Polish death camp' verbal gaffe&amp;quot;].  The Hill website/Policy/International.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gaffes are inevitable for people with a high profile, but several of Obama's were very revealing (&amp;quot;you didn't build that&amp;quot;), and they show how the [[mainstream media]] tends to emphasize the gaffes of conservatives as opposed to liberals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Famous quotes'''&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;quot;I continue to believe that [[Donald Trump]] will not be president.&amp;quot; (stated when asked by a reporter a month prior to Election Day)&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4iZSW_76TE Democrats and Media Agreed: There Was No Way Donald Trump Could Be Elected], Video&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Election meddling===&lt;br /&gt;
By custom, President Obama stayed neutral during the primaries, even though his close friend and Vice President [[Creepy Uncle Joe]] [[Biden]] was seriously considering a Presidential campaign.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Once Hillary Clinton won the Democratic nomination, Obama campaigned for her and also attended fundraisers.  Obama publicly criticized the Republican candidate, [[Donald Trump]] who had previously spent years claiming that Obama was not born in the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Last days and transition===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Susan-rice-email-1-2.jpg|right|300px|thumb|A smoking gun email linking Barack Obama to illegal domestic spying on political opponents and civil rights violations.]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Trump transition|FISA abuse}}&lt;br /&gt;
In a stunning repudiation of Obama's policies, Republican businessman [[Donald Trump]] was elected over Democrat [[Hillary Clinton]] – Obama considered it a personal insult.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Huston, Warner Todd (May 3, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/05/03/obama-considered-trumps-election-personal-insult/ Report: Obama Considered Trump’s Election a Personal Insult]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 3, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kafozoff, Kristian (May 3, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/obama-considered-trumps-2016-win-as-personal-insult-new-updates-from-book_2905270.html Obama Considered Trump’s 2016 Win As ‘Personal Insult’: New Updates From Book]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved May 3, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In a frantic attempt to leave some sort of legacy, Obama issued a very large amount of far-Left executive orders and regulations which revealed his true political views if any doubt remained.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ActionsSpree&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Lucas, Fred (December 26, 2016). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/26/spree-obama-actions-revives-gop-concerns-over-midnight-regs-agenda.html?refresh=true Spree of Obama actions revives GOP concerns over ‘midnight’ regs, agenda]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved December 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These orders included blocking large areas of the [[Arctic Ocean|Arctic]] and [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]] oceans from oil and gas drilling, effectively barring the U.S. from real [[Energy Independence|energy independence]]; breaking the record of pardons and commutations in a single day for criminals (many of them were sentenced for drug-related crimes), showing his soft stance on crime and drugs; ending the defunct NSEERS program to register male immigrants from North Korea and [[Islam]]ic countries (the necessary, beneficial, and useful program was suspended by the Obama Administration in 2011&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/22/obama-ditches-registry-focused-on-immigrant-men-from-muslim-countries.html Obama ditches registry focused on immigrant men from Muslim countries]. ''Fox News''. December 22, 2016. Retrieved March 9, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;); attempting to transfer even more terrorists out of [[Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp|Guantanamo Bay]]; allowing an anti-[[Israel]] resolution pass in the [[United Nations]]; enacting a record amount of unnecessary, useless, and job-killing regulations; and even more.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;ActionsSpree&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama added 120,000 illegal immigrants to the DACA program in the last three months of his presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Binder, John (May 16, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/texas/2017/05/16/obama-stamped-120k-dreamers-trump-takeover/ Obama Stamped 120K DREAMers Before Trump Takeover]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved May 16, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama made these actions knowing that Trump, who had almost completely opposite political views on these issues, was going to enter the [[White House]] in such short a time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although all of Obama's actions were worrisome, his actions in regards to Israel were particularly noteworthy. He broke over 35 years of American policy by abstaining from a UN vote and allowing a blatantly anti-Israel resolution to pass, showing his true stance concerning Israel.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;StrikeAgain&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://worldisraelnews.com/israel-fears-obama-will-strike/ Israel fears Obama will strike again]. ''World Israel News''. December 26, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;FedUpDrastic&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Berkowitz, Adam Eliyahu (December 26, 2016). [https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/80855/fed-up-with-obamas-trickery-netanyahu-takes-drastic-actions/#VbVlRMtkx4zLRc3f.97 Fed Up With United States Trickery, Netanyahu Takes Drastic Actions]. ''Breaking Israel News''. Retrieved December 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Soon before leaving office, Obama bypassed Congress and gave the [[State of Palestine]] $221 million.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;221MLastHours&amp;quot;/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama continued to believe that he could have successfully &amp;quot;won&amp;quot; a third term as president had he been able to run.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/26/obama-could-have-won-third-term.html?refresh=true Obama: I could have won third term]. ''Fox News''. December 26, 2016. Retrieved December 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Regardless of the factuality of that claim, Democrats lost 1,042 seats—including U.S. House, Senate, state governorship, and state legislative seats—during his eight years in office.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;1,000Seats&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/27/democrats-lost-over-1000-seats-under-obama.html Democrats lost over 1,000 seats under Obama]. ''Fox News''. December 27, 2016. Retrieved December 27, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama also believed that &amp;quot;the Democratic Party has stayed pretty grounded in fact and reality&amp;quot; despite its negative policies that suggest otherwise.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lawler, David (December 26, 2016). [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/26/barack-obama-says-democrats-will-not-disintegrate-like-labour/ Barack Obama says Democrats will not 'disintegrate' like Labour under Jeremy Corbyn]. ''The Telegraph''. Retrieved December 26, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama made Trump's transition much harder and rockier than it could have been by his leftist executive orders, decisions, and comments during the transition period.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Swoyer, Alex (December 28, 2016). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/28/donald-trump-responds-to-president-obamas-many-inflammatory-statements/ Donald Trump Responds to President Obama’s ‘Many Inflammatory’ Statements]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved December 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scott, Eugine (December 28, 2016). [https://www.cnn.com/2016/12/28/politics/trump-obama-statements-not-smooth-transition/ Trump: 'NOT' a smooth transition after Obama 'roadblocks']. ''CNN''. Retrieved December 28, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama received the Department of Defense Medal for Distinguished Public Service from [[Secretary of Defense]] [[Ash Carter]], an Obama appointee in the same administration.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Huston, Warner Todd (January 4, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/04/president-obama-awards-himself-distinguished-public-service-medal/ President Obama Awards Himself Distinguished Public Service Medal]. ''Breitbart''. Retrieved January 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Although the award was created in 1947, the only other presidents to have received the medal (all during their tenure) are [[Bill Clinton]], a left-wing Democrat, and [[George W. Bush]], who holds [[RINO]] positions on certain issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an interview, Obama claimed that &amp;quot;we are probably the first administration in modern history that hasn't had a major scandal in the White House,&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://insider.foxnews.com/2017/01/13/president-obama-60-minutes-no-white-house-scandals-during-my-administration Obama: I'm the 1st Modern President Without a Major Scandal]. ''Fox News Insider''. January 13, 2017. Retrieved January 16 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Obama's Chief of Staff [[Denis McDonough]] claimed likewise,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shelbourne, Mallory (January 15, 2017). [https://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/314396-obama-chief-of-staff-most-proud-we-are-scandal-free Chief of staff: Obama administration 'historically free of scandal']. ''The Hill''. Retrieved January 16, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; despite the strong and massive evidence to the contrary.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dickens, Geoffrey (January 16, 2017). [https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/geoffrey-dickens/2017/01/16/ The Seven Most Undercovered Obama Scandals]. ''[[NewsBusters]]''. Retrieved January 16, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hemingway, Mark (January 9, 2017). [https://www.weeklystandard.com/the-obama-era-had-scandals-aplenty/article/2006197 The Obama Era Had Scandals Aplenty]. ''[[Weekly Standard]]''. Retrieved January 16, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Massive increase in regulations in 2016====&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to his other actions in 2016, Obama massively increased the number of federal regulations during his last days in office.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Harper, Jennifer (May 30, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/30/inside-the-beltway-obamas-unprecedented-surge-of-r/ Inside the Beltway: Obama’s unprecedented ‘surge’ of regulations]. '' The Washington Times''. Retrieved May 30, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lawler, Joseph (May 31, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-rules-surged-in-obamas-last-year-to-3853-most-pages-in-federal-register-ever/article/2624503 New rules surged in Obama's last year to 3,853, most pages in Federal Register ever]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved May 31, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; More regulations were finalized in every year since 2005, and they cost the economy $2 trillion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Sherfinski, David (May 31, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/31/obamas-regulations-in-2016-to-drain-economy-by-2-t/ Obama’s regulations in 2016 to drain economy by $2 trillion]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved May 31, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Post-presidency==&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Democrats' attacks on Barack Hussein Obama}}&lt;br /&gt;
Obama made an ungraceful departure from office claiming on October 18, 2016, Donald Trump's complaints of lies spread about Trump were corrosive to American democracy and an invented conspiracy theory.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2016/10/18/politics/obama-trumps-rigged-election-claim-whining-before-the-games-even-over/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Less than two months later after Trump had won, Obama claimed he himself had been derelict in his duty and had fallen asleep at the switch allowing Russian hackers to steal the election for Donald Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/15/us/politics/russia-hack-election-trump-obama.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite Obama's opposition to Trump's plan to build a wall along the U.S.–[[Mexico]] border in order to secure it, it was reported in early 2017 that he was building a wall around his new mansion, obviously to keep unwanted people out.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama-building-a-wall-around-his-new-dc-house/article/2611130 Obama building a wall around his new DC house]. ''Washington Examiner''. January 6, 2017. Retrieved January 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama acquired a lavish celebrity lifestyle after ending his presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Varney, James (June 17, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/17/obama-endorsement-coveted-ex-president-writes-own-/ Hobnobbing Obama raking in the cash post-presidency -- while still dabbling in politics]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved June 19, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He spent much of his time vacationing in exclusive and elite locations around the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bennett, Kate (March 17, 2017). [https://www.cnn.com/2017/03/17/politics/where-in-the-world-is-barack-obama/ Barack Obama is probably lying on a beach in a deserted paradise right now]. ''CNN''. Retrieved March 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He spent much time with left-wing celebrities, such as spending [[Good Friday]] 2017 on a $300 million yacht with celebrities such as [[Bruce Springsteen]], [[Tom Hanks]], and [[Oprah Winfrey]],&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hudson, Jerome (April 17, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2017/04/17/barack-michelle-obama-join-oprah-springsteen-hanks-on-david-geffens-yacht/ Good Friday: Obamas Join Winfrey, Springsteen, Hanks on David Geffen’s Yacht]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 27, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and in Italy in 2019 with [[George Clooney]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Huston, Warner Todd (June 25, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/06/25/jet-setting-obamas-seen-hobnobbing-with-the-clooneys-on-ritzy-lake-como/ Jet Setting Obamas Seen Hobnobbing with the Clooneys on Ritzy Lake Como]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 25, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In addition, Obama accepted a $400,000 speech backed by Wall Street,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/27/obama-spokesman-defends-reported-400000-wall-street-backed-speech.html Obama spokesman defends reported $400,000 Wall Street-backed speech]. ''Fox News''. April 27, 2017. Retrieved April 27, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; something that stunned even many liberals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Wallace, Christopher (April 27, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/27/obamas-400g-wall-street-speech-leaves-liberal-base-stunned.html Obama's $400G Wall Street speech leaves liberal base stunned]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved April 27, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Despite the criticism over the speech, Obama gave another $400,000 speech shortly afterward.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/28/obama-reportedly-pulls-in-another-400g-for-speech.html Obama reportedly pulls in another $400G for speech]. ''Fox News''. April 28, 2017. Retrieved April 28, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  [[Bernie Sanders]] described Obama's speaking fees as &amp;quot;unfortunate.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/04/28/unfortunate-bernie-sanders-criticizes-obama-for-accepting-400k-for-wall-street-speech/ ‘Unfortunate’: Bernie Sanders criticizes Obama for accepting $400K for Wall Street speech], [[The Blaze]]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In May 2017, Obama traveled to Italy to give a speech on [[global warming|climate change]], but used pollution-heavy transportation to get to his destination.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Zanotti, Emily (May 21, 2017). [https://heatst.com/politics/obama-speaks-on-global-warming-then-spews-co2-with-private-jet-13-car-motorcade/ Obama Speaks on Global Warming, Then Spews CO2 With Private Jet, 13-Car Motorcade]. ''Heat Street''. Retrieved May 22, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On June 6, 2017, Obama gave a $400,000 speech to the Chamber of Commerce in [[Montreal]] in which one of the topics he spoke about was &amp;quot;warning against income inequality and the concentration of wealth.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Starr, Penny (June 7, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/06/07/obama-warns-income-inequality-delivering-7700-minute-speech/ Obama Warns Against Income Inequality While Delivering $7,700-a-Minute Speech]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; After leaving office, Obama bought a house in D.C. for $8.1 million.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/31/obamas-purchase-d-c-house-for-8-1-million-new-report-says.html Obamas purchase D.C. house for $8.1 million, new report says]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bennett, Kate (June 2, 2017). [https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/31/politics/obama-house-kalorama/index.html Obamas purchase their DC rental house for millions]. ''CNN''. Retrieved June 7, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In August and September 2017, Obama made a combined $1.2 million from three Wall Street speeches.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shelbourne, Mallory (September 18, 2017). [https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/351138-obama-making-big-money-speeches-to-wall-street-firms-report Obama making big-money speeches to Wall Street firms: report]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved September 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Yilek, Caitlin (September 18, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obama-making-400000-speeches-to-wall-street-firms-report/article/2634736 Obama making $400,000 speeches to Wall Street firms: Report]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kight, Stef W. (September 18, 2017). [https://www.axios.com/trump-wants-a-july-4th-military-parade-2486828811.html Obama to make $1.2 million from 3 Wall Street speeches]. ''Axios''. Retrieved September 18, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/19/obama-cashes-in-on-wall-street-appearances-report-says.html Obama cashes in on Wall Street appearances, report says]. ''Fox News''. September 19, 2017. Retrieved September 19, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In late 2019, the Obama family bought a mansion in Martha's Vineyard for $11.75 million.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Calicchio, Dom (December 5, 2019). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/obamas-pay-11-75m-for-marthas-vineyard-home-report Obamas pay $11.75M for Martha’s Vineyard home on nearly 30 acres: report]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved December 5, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Kurtz, Judy (December 6, 2019). [https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/473343-obamas-buy-home-in-marthas-vineyard Obamas buy home on Martha's Vineyard]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved December 6, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bleau, Hannah (December 6, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/06/obamas-officially-purchase-11-75-million-waterfront-mansion-in-marthas-vineyard/ Obamas Officially Purchase $11.75 Million Waterfront Mansion in Martha’s Vineyard]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved December 6, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several of Obama's failures as U.S. president were revealed shortly after he left office, as it was found that [[Syria]] continued to possess chemical weapons after Obama stated they were gone, that the Obama Administration misrepresented the release of some Iranian prisoners, and that the Obama Administration had unmasked [[Trump Transition]] officials (See: [[Barack Obama Controversies]] and [[Obamagate timeline]]).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shepherd, Todd (April 29, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/obamas-first-100-days-as-ex-president/article/2621662 Obama's first 100 days as ex-president]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved May 1, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After leaving office, Obama started his own foundation, the Obama Foundation, and set to work on building his presidential center and library.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Berger, Judson (May 3, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/03/clinton-obama-return-to-public-eye-with-new-ventures.html Clinton, Obama return to public eye with new ventures]. ''Fox News''. May 3, 2017. Retrieved May 3, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama's 2018 budget request, which was over $1.1 million, made him the most expensive U.S. president in the country's history.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Rodriguez, Katherine (September 2, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/09/02/obama-is-the-most-expensive-ex-president-for-american-taxpayers/ Obama Is the Most Expensive Ex-President for American Taxpayers]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 2, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Dinan, Stephen (August 31, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/aug/31/obama-will-top-bush-most-costly-ex-president/ Obama will top Bush as most costly ex-president]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved September 2, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Caralle, Katelyn (September 1, 2017). [https://freebeacon.com/politics/obama-most-costly-former-president-2018/ Obama Poised to Be Most Costly Former President in 2018]. ''The Washington Free Beacon''. Retrieved September 2, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Bohon, Dave (September 2, 2016). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/26826-obama-most-expensive-ex-president-ever Obama Most Expensive Ex-President Ever]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 2, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was reported in June 2018 that construction work related to his presidential library would cost Illinois taxpayers nearly $200 million.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Shaw, Adam (June 16, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/16/work-related-to-obama-presidential-center-to-cost-illinois-taxpayers-nearly-200-million.html Work related to Obama Presidential Center to cost Illinois taxpayers nearly $200 million]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved June 16, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Rodriguez, Katherine (June 16, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/16/report-obama-presidential-center-cost-taxpayers-200-million/ Report: Obama Presidential Center to Cost Taxpayers Nearly $200 Million]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 16, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Despite promising not to cut down any trees in Jackson Park, where the library was planned to be built, the Obama Center and Chicago Park District began removing trees anyway for work related to the library construction.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Huston, Warner Todd (August 11, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/08/11/obama-center-breaks-promise-remove-trees-jackson-park/ Obama Center Breaks Pledge Not to Remove Trees in Jackson Park]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 11, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama did a $50 million deal with the [[cultural Marxist]] [[child pornography]] vendor [[Netflix]] corporation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://archive.is/AfHZz&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was reported in May 2017 that the Justice Department under Obama likely discriminated against veterans – in violation of federal law requiring the government to give preference to veterans in job hiring – by attempting to influence them to withdraw their applications.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Dinan, Stephen (May 17, 2017). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/17/obama-doj-refused-hire-veterans-jobs-investigation/ Obama’s Justice Department refused to hire military veterans for jobs]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved May 19, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama did not give any mention of [[Independence Day]] on his Facebook or Twitter on that day in 2017 while he was visiting [[Seoul]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Huston, Warner Todd (July 5, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/05/july-4th-no-mention-independence-day-barack-obamas-twitter-facebook/ On July 4th: No Mention of Independence Day on Barack Obama’s Twitter or Facebook]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 5, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Obama denied the existence [[Barack Obama Controversies|of any scandals]] &amp;quot;that embarrassed us&amp;quot; during his presidency.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Spiering, Charlie (February 27, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/27/obama-didnt-scandal-embarrassed-us-presidency/ Barack Obama: ‘We Didn’t Have a Scandal that Embarrassed Us’ in My Presidency]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved February 27, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In May 2018, he repeated his claim that the Administration &amp;quot;didn't have scandals&amp;quot; and was less corrupt than other modern administrations.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Manchester, Julia (May 24, 2018). [https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/389188-obama-jokingly-brags-i-didnt-have-scandals-during-my-presidency Obama jokingly brags: 'I didn't have scandals' during my presidency]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved May 24, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He repeated these false claims in March 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Chaitin, Daniel (March 6, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/obama-brags-in-canada-my-team-never-experienced-scandal-made-mistakes-of-integrity Obama brags in Canada: My team never experienced scandal, made 'mistakes of integrity']. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved March 6, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In July 2018, he gave a speech in [[South Africa]] calling for [[basic income]], saying he wanted to pay more taxes, and advocating for other left-wing ideas such as criticizing income inequality despite admitting he was very wealthy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (July 24, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/africa/item/29624-in-south-africa-obama-outlines-globalist-agenda-for-humanity In South Africa, Obama Outlines Globalist Agenda for Humanity]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 25, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Singman, Brooke (July 17, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/17/obama-slams-populist-right-wing-billionaires-touts-liberal-push-for-universal-income.html Obama slams populist 'right-wing billionaires,' touts liberal push for 'universal income']. ''Fox News''. Retrieved July 17, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Caplan, Joshua (July 17, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/17/barack-obama-preaches-wealth-redistribution-in-south-africa/ Barack Obama Lectures World on Racial, Wealth Inequality in South Africa]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 17, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Boyer, Dave (July 17, 2018). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/17/obama-surprised-his-wealth-wants-pay-more-taxes/ Obama says he's 'surprised' by his wealth, wants to pay more taxes]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved July 17, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Hoft, Jim (July 18, 2018). [https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/obama-ridicules-the-rich-theres-only-so-big-a-house-you-can-have-obamas-just-bought-8-1-million-house/ Obama Ridicules the Rich: “There’s Only So Big a House You Can Have” …After Obamas Just Bought $8.1 Million House]. ''Gateway Pundit''. Retrieved July 18, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Pollak, Joel B. (July 17, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/17/barack-obama-government-individual-south-africa/ Barack Obama in South Africa: ‘Government Exists to Serve the Individual, and Not the Other Way Around’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 17, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lee, Tony (July 17, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/17/obama-concedes-new-international-elite-out-of-touch-for-exploiting-lower-cost-immigrant-labor/ Obama Concedes ‘New International Elite’ Out of Touch for Exploiting ‘Lower-Cost Immigrant Labor’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 17, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He also advanced his [[War on Sovereignty|anti-nation-state agenda]] in the speech,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Munro, Neil (July 17, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/economics/2018/07/17/obama-abolish-the-nation-state/ Obama: Abolish the Nation-State!] ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved July 17, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and he praised the country's racist strongman leaders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Newman, Alex (July 25, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/africa/item/29634-amid-racist-land-grabs-obama-praises-south-african-strongman Amid Racist Land Grabs, Obama Praises South African Strongman]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 25, 2018.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (July 29, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/africa/item/29658-obama-slams-trump-while-deifying-communist-terror-leader Obama Slams Trump While Deifying Communist Terror Leader]. ''The New American''. Retrieved July 30, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On September 7, 2018, Obama made a speech in which he harshly criticized President Trump, breaking his promise not to publicly make such statements.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Spiering, Charlie (September 7, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/07/bitter-barack-obama-breaks-months-of-silence-to-trash-donald-trump/ Bitter Barack Obama Breaks Months of Silence to Trash Donald Trump]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 7, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Schallhorn, Kaitlyn; Shaw, Adam (September 7, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/07/obama-returns-to-campaign-trail-with-fiery-speech-trump-counters-fell-asleep.html Obama returns to campaign trail with fiery speech; Trump counters, 'I fell asleep']. ''Fox News''. Retrieved September 7, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Duke, Selwyn (September 8, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/30014-obama-s-back-slamming-trump-and-projecting-his-own-sins-onto-gop Obama’s Back, Slamming Trump and Projecting His Own Sins onto GOP]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 9, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; He also tried to take credit for the strong economic growth under President Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Byas, Steve (September 13, 2018). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/economy/item/30062-obama-brazenly-tried-to-take-credit-for-better-economy-under-trump Obama Brazenly Tried to Take Credit for Better Economy Under Trump]. ''The New American''. Retrieved September 15, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Obama made speeches criticizing [[nationalism]] and promoting [[globalism]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Caplan, Joshua (September 28, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/28/barack-obama-lectures-europeans-about-nationalism-in-denmark/ Barack Obama Lectures Europeans About Nationalism — in Denmark]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved September 28, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; On November 2, 2018, Obama called on Florida voters to vote Democrat because it would help [[Cuba]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Spiering, Charlie (November 3, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/11/03/cuba-first-barack-obama-says-florida-democrats-help-make-cuba-great-again/ Cuba First: Barack Obama Says Florida Democrats Will Help Make Cuba Great Again]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved November 3, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In a speech in Berlin in April 2019, Obama referred to himself 392 times, a personal record and more than doubling his previous record.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gage, John (April 8, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/barack-obama-refers-to-himself-a-record-breaking-392-times-in-berlin-speech Barack Obama refers to himself a record-breaking 392 times in Berlin speech]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved April 8, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the candidates that Obama campaigned for in the [[2018 midterm election]]s lost.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lowe, Tiana (November 7, 2018). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/obama-loses-again https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/obama-loses-again]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved November 7, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the state of [[Iowa]] once played a key role in Obama's election, by 2019, Democrat candidates almost never mentioned his name in the state.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Simonson, Joseph (April 9, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/barack-who-iowa-propelled-obama-to-the-white-house-now-no-one-speaks-his-name Barack who? Iowa propelled Obama to the White House — now, no one speaks his name]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved April 9, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By 2019, Obama became disliked even by left-wing Democrats.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Miller, S.A.; McLaughlin, Seth (August 3, 2019). [https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/1/obama-presidential-legacy-attacked-joe-biden-2020-/ Why Democrats are tossing Obama under the bus]. ''The Washington Times''. Retrieved August 3, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Subversive activities===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|2020 Marxist insurrection|Obama FISA abuse|}}&lt;br /&gt;
In an interview with Roland Martin in 2015, Rep. [[Maxine Waters]] said:&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|'''Roland Martin:''' Come 2016 that’s it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Maxine Waters:''' Well, you know, I don’t know. And I think some people are missing something here.&lt;br /&gt;
The president has put in place an organization that contains a kind of database&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theconservativetreehouse.com/?s=%22secret+project%22&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; that no one has seen before in life. That’s going to be very very powerful, and whoever…(crosstalk)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Roland Martin (interrupts):''' In terms of [[Organizing for America]] that he’s now shifted to a 501(c)4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Maxine Waters:''' That’s right. That’s right. And that database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that its never been done before and whoever runs on the [[Democratic party|Democratic]] ticket will have to deal with that…it’s very powerful what he’s leaving in place.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://theblacksphere.net/2020/06/obama-planned-for-the-riots/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
''[[The New York Post]]'' reported in early 2017:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2017/02/11/how-obama-is-scheming-to-sabotage-trumps-presidency/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|When former President Barack Obama said he was “heartened” by anti-Trump protests, he was sending a message of approval to his troops. Troops? Yes, Obama has an army of agitators — numbering more than 30,000 — who will fight his Republican successor at every turn of his historic presidency. And Obama will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House.&lt;br /&gt;
In what’s shaping up to be a highly unusual post-presidency, Obama isn’t just staying behind in Washington. He’s working behind the scenes to set up what will effectively be a shadow government to not only protect his threatened legacy, but to sabotage the incoming administration and its popular “America First” agenda.&lt;br /&gt;
He’s doing it through a network of leftist nonprofits led by Organizing for Action. Normally you’d expect an organization set up to support a politician and his agenda to close up shop after that candidate leaves office, but not Obama’s OFA. Rather, it’s gearing up for battle, with a growing war chest and more than 250 offices across the country.&lt;br /&gt;
Since Donald Trump’s election, this little-known but well-funded protesting arm has beefed up staff and ramped up recruitment of young liberal activists, declaring on its website, “We’re not backing down.” Determined to salvage Obama’s legacy, it’s drawing battle lines on immigration, ObamaCare, race relations and climate change.}}&lt;br /&gt;
While Obama worried that Trump was now president, he left enough swamp rats in DC to keep his operation running. Still, he was forced to have a more hands-on approach to OFA than intended. The article continues:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Quotebox|Obama is intimately involved in [[OFA]] operations and even tweets from the group’s account. In fact, he gave marching orders to OFA foot soldiers following Trump’s upset victory.&lt;br /&gt;
“It is fine for everybody to feel stressed, sad, discouraged,” he said in a conference call from the White House. “But get over it.” He demanded they “move forward to protect what we’ve accomplished.”&lt;br /&gt;
“Now is the time for some organizing,” he said. “So don’t mope.”&lt;br /&gt;
Far from sulking, OFA activists helped organize anti-Trump marches across US cities, some of which turned into riots. After Trump issued a temporary ban on immigration from seven terror-prone Muslim nations, the demonstrators jammed airports, chanting: “No ban, no wall, sanctuary for all!”&lt;br /&gt;
Run by old Obama aides and campaign workers, federal tax records show “nonpartisan” OFA marshals 32,525 volunteers nationwide. Registered as a 501(c)(4), it doesn’t have to disclose its donors, but they’ve been generous. OFA has raised more than $40 million in contributions and grants since evolving from Obama’s campaign organization Obama for America in 2013.&lt;br /&gt;
OFA, in IRS filings, says it trains young activists to develop “organizing skills.” Armed with Obama’s 2012 campaign database, OFA plans to get out the vote for Democratic candidates it’s grooming to win back Congress and erect a wall of resistance to Trump at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://nypost.com/2017/01/30/obama-says-hes-heartened-by-backlash-to-trumps-ban/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Obama told aides that the nationwide riots following the death of [[George Floyd]] are “a tailor-made moment” to help his former vice president Joe Biden defeat Donald Trump.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/06/obama_admits_it_riots_and_protests_are_tailormade_for_electing_joe_biden.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legacy==&lt;br /&gt;
In September 2016, a [[Parasite|parasitic]] worm, the [[Baracktrema obamai]], was named after Obama.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kaplan, Sarah (September 9, 2016). [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/09/09/scientists-like-barack-obama-so-much-that-they-named-a-parasite-after-him/ Scientists like Barack Obama so much that they named a parasite after him]. ''The Washington Post''. Retrieved September 9, 2016.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  As of December 2016, at least 15 schools in the United States have been named after Obama. [[Illinois]], a very liberal state, enacted a law making August 4 &amp;quot;Barack Obama Day,&amp;quot; and it almost made the day a paid holiday for its state workers despite its dire financial situation caused by leftist policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Huston, Warner Todd (August 7, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/07/illinois-makes-obama-birthday-state-holiday/ Deep Blue Illinois Makes Obama’s Birthday a State Holiday]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 8, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Carter, Brandon (August 6, 2017). [https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/345523-illinois-makes-barack-obama-day-a-state-holiday Illinois makes 'Barack Obama Day' a state holiday]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved August 6, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*Siciliano, John (August 6, 2017). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/barack-obama-day-is-official-holiday-in-illinois/article/2630769 'Barack Obama Day' is official holiday in Illinois]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved August 6, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/07/illinois-governor-signs-law-to-honor-barack-obamas-birthday.html Illinois governor signs law to honor Barack Obama's birthday]. ''Fox News'' (from the ''Associated Press''). Retrieved August 7, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Gearty, Robert (August 4, 2018). [https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/04/illinois-celebrates-first-official-barack-obama-day.html Illinois celebrates first official 'Barack Obama Day']. ''Fox News''. Retrieved August 4, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
*Rodriguez, Katherine (August 4, 2018). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/08/04/illinois-residents-celebrate-first-annual-barack-obama-day/ Illinois Residents Celebrate First Annual ‘Barack Obama Day’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved August 5, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Obama's greatest legacy may be stoking anti-police [[hatred]] among a minority [[criminal]] element of black Democrat voters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conservatives strongly criticized Obama for his far-left and negative policies and the negative impact of those policies.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scaliger, Charles (February 23, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25433-barack-obama-s-legacy Barack Obama's Legacy]. ''The New American''. Retrieved June 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adelmann, Bob (January 20, 2017). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/25183-is-obama-worst-u-s-president Is Obama Worst U.S. President?] ''The New American''. Retrieved June 20, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Vargas, Mark (September 16, 2018). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/the-legacy-of-barack-obama-and-its-not-a-good-one The legacy of Barack Obama (and it's not a good one)]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved September 16, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Dinesh D'Souza]] wrote, &amp;quot;Obama's legacy is to double the national debt &amp;amp; dramatically reduce US influence in the world.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://twitter.com/dineshdsouza/status/760447860638789632&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; During Obama's 8 years in office, Democrats lost over 1,000 seats in the federal and state governments.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;1,000Seats&amp;quot;/&amp;gt; Obama abused his power by using [[surveillance]] tools granted under the [[Patriot Act]], intended to fight terrorism and [[Al Qaeda]], against domestic political opponents and the [[Republican party]].   Obama may best be remembered for his use of coercion, [[police state]] tactics and [[authoritarian]] tendencies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon assuming office, President [[Donald Trump]] wiped out much of Obama's last-minute regulatory actions through [[Congressional Review]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Korte, Gregory (March 27, 2017). [https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/03/27/trump-signs-four-bills-roll-back-obama-era-regulations/99690456/ Trump signs four bills to roll back Obama-era regulations]. ''USA Today''. Retrieved March 28, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Pollak, Joel B. (April 15, 2017). [https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/04/15/trump-congressional-review-act-legislative-milestone/ Trump’s Use of the Congressional Review Act Is a Legislative Milestone]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved April 15, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Trump also adopted a stronger foreign policy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Llorente, Elizabeth (April 14, 2017). [https://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/04/14/ex-obama-officials-say-hesitation-to-use-force-in-syria-elsewhere-emboldened-adversaries.html Ex-Obama officials say hesitation to use force in Syria, elsewhere, emboldened adversaries]. ''Fox News''. Retrieved April 14, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Collinson, Stephen (April 14, 2017). [https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/14/politics/donald-trump-military-afghanistan/index.html Trump carves out tough commander-in-chief posture]. ''CNN''. Retrieved April 14, 2017.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many commentators have noticed similarities between Mr. Obama and Breaking Bad's [[Walter White]], including ''The New York Times'',&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/08/fashion/barack-obama-bryan-cranston-table-for-three.html?mcubz=0&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Politico,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.politico.com/blogs/click/2013/12/obama-is-hooked-on-breaking-bad-180326&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and USA Today.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/12/30/obama-television-shows-breaking-bad-house-of-cards-homeland/4247651/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Former Obama [[HUD Secretary]] [[Julian Castro]] and Joe Biden sparred over who was the heir to the Obama legacy in the Democratic pre-primary [[2020 presidential election]] debates. Obama withheld his support from his former vice president, [[Biden's age]] presumably being the main factor. Castro argued, &amp;quot;I'm fulfilling the legacy of Barack Obama, and you're not.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/13/julian-castro-attacks-joe-biden-health-care-im-fulfilling-legacy-barack-obama-youre-not/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an article entitled, ''If God doesn’t do something soon, he’s going to owe Sodom &amp;amp; Gomorrah an apology'', Tom Tillison wrote, &amp;quot;Oppose 9-year-old drag queens in post-Obama America and the [[liberal media]] is sure to tag you with a “[[homophobe]]” label.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/10/27/drag-kids-debuts-if-god-doesnt-do-something-soon-hes-going-to-owe-sodom-gomorrah-an-apology-844721&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When millions of minorities defected from the [[Democrat plantation]] in the [[2020 presidential election]], Obama launched a racist attack against [[Hispanic]]s.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://thepoliticalinsider.com/barack-obama-blasts-hispanics-who-voted-for-trump-they-ignored-the-presidents-racism-because-they-oppose-gay-marriage/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
*Margolis, Matt; Noonan, Mark (2018). [https://www.amazon.com/Worst-President-History-Legacy-Barack/dp/1682618137/ ''The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama'']. New York: Bombardier Books. ISBN 978-1682618134.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obamagate timeline 2009-2015]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obamagate timeline|Obamagate timeline 2016 election year]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russiagate timeline 2017]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Russiagate timeline|Russiagate timeline 2018]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Political positions of Barack Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and uncharitableness]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama and abortion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Ukrainian crisis]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Born Outside the U.S.A.!]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: The Special Interests Candidate]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Lobbyists ties to the Obama administration]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama doublespeak]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama inauguration]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Religion of Barack Hussein Obama]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama's Muslim Heritage]]''&lt;br /&gt;
*[[The Honorable James David Manning]]	&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:The Obama Manifesto]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama syndrome]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama's past dog meat eating and 2012 election campaign]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama's &amp;quot;Last chance at dinner&amp;quot; fundraising letter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Barack Obama is the antichrist speculation]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Does Barack Hussein Obama care if America defaults on credit?]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:The lie that we are safer under Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: Foes Want Obama to Fail, A Republican Perspective]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay:Impeach Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Benghazigate timeline]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama's second term agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[ObamaRail]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama sequester]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Obama (disambiguation)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Essay: President's speech after the defeat of two tyrants]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Unconstitutional]] [[Executive amnesty]] via Obama [[Executive Order]]s&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Universal health care]] for [[Illegal immigration|illegal aliens]] via [[ObamaCare]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[FusionGPS]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Deep state coup]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Crossfire Hurricane]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Reflist|colwidth=35em}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=O000167 Profile] on the ''Biographical Directory of the United States Congress''&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://barackobamadoubletalk.com/ Barack Obama Doubletalk]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://archive.is/73G5z Statement from Senator Obama on Russia's Decision to Recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia as Independent States, Chicago, IL | August 26, 2008] &lt;br /&gt;
*[https://hotair.com/archives/2013/07/03/national-journal-obama-facing-crisis-over-incompetence/ National Journal: Obama facing crisis over incompetence]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/article/6130/ The New Cult of Personality]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/06/23/che-obama-and-the-revolutionary-agenda/ Che, Obama, and the Revolutionary Agenda]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/09/americas-first-muslim-president/ GAFFNEY: America's first Muslim president?] Washington Times&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-l-esposito/barack-obama-and-islam_b_212519.html Barack Obama and Islam.] by [[John L. Esposito]].&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&amp;amp;pageId=78931 Democrat: Obama's grandma confirms Kenyan birth.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.ontheissues.org/barack_obama.htm Barack Obama on the issues.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xO8qZP_iU9I Obama - The Anti-Israel President]&lt;br /&gt;
{{USPresidents}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{2008 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{2012 presidential candidates}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Globalism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Deep State}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{communism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{DEFAULTSORT:Obama, Barack Hussein}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Barack Hussein Obama]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Presidency]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Obama Administration]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nobel Laureates in Peace]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Abortion Advocates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Common Core Advocates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Socialists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Progressivism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Totalitarianism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Homosexual Agenda]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chicago]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Globalists]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti Second Amendment]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hillary Clinton email scandal]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Blame America Crowd]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Liberal Authors]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Best Selling Authors]][[Category:Soros Mercenaries]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Criminals]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Terrorism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Corruption]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Police State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Worst Liberal Politicians]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marxism&amp;diff=1710521</id>
		<title>Marxism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marxism&amp;diff=1710521"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:32:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:anti-duhring.jpg|thumb|254x383px|''Anti-Dühring'' was a foundational text in the development of &amp;quot;worldview Marxism&amp;quot;. Visible in the 1939 edition is a portrait of Lenin and the adoption of [[Marxism-Leninism]] as the officially &amp;quot;updated&amp;quot; worldview of Marxism.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Marxism''' is the name given to a set of ideas, theories, and political ideologies that developed out of the works of Karl Marx. The term itself is difficult to define due to conflicting interpretations. After Marx's death, the term Marxism came to describe a holistic worldview (German: ''Weltanschauung'') that included theories of philosophy, history, politics, economics, and science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Etymology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxism is derived from the name of German philosopher [[Karl Marx]]. The term was popularized by [[Karl Kautsky]] who considered himself an [[Orthodox Marxism|&amp;quot;orthodox&amp;quot; Marxist]] during the dispute between the orthodox and revisionist followers of Marx. Kautsky's revisionist rival [[Eduard Bernstein]] also later adopted use of the term. [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]] did not support the use of the term &amp;quot;Marxism&amp;quot; to describe either Marx's or his views. Engels claimed that the term was being abusively used as a rhetorical qualifier by those attempting to cast themselves as &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; followers of Marx while casting others in different terms, such as &amp;quot;Lassallians&amp;quot;. In 1882, Engels claimed that Marx had criticized self-proclaimed &amp;quot;Marxist&amp;quot; [[Paul Lafargue]], by saying that if Lafargue's views were considered &amp;quot;Marxist&amp;quot;, then &amp;quot;One thing is certain and that is that I am not a Marxist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Letter to Bernstein, 1882.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Marxism can roughly be defined as the application of the materialist method to the study of social phenomena. It regards the material conditions and class conflict as driving forces behind historical social development -- Marxism stresses the causal effects of material conditions and class conflict. Marxism primarily focuses on explaining society and history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to establish a precise definition and framing of Marxism can depend on the emphasis preferred by a theoretician on one aspect of the method over another. The complexity of Marx's writings allows for misreadings, misinterpretations, and misplacing emphasis, and enables abuse. Arguably, Marxism as comprehensive world view originated after Marx's death from the efforts of Karl Kautsky, Friedrich Engels, and Georgi Plekhanov. Classical Marxism is based on the writings of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxism is not an ideology. It is strictly a method of social analysis. Scientific socialism is a socialist political ideology based around Marxist theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Placing different emphasis on different aspects of Marxist analysis produces different branches of Marxism. Different schools place a greater emphasis on certain aspects of classical Marxism while de-emphasizing or rejecting other aspects of Marxism, sometimes combining Marxist analysis with non-Marxian concepts. Some variants of Marxism primarily focus on one aspect of Marxism as the determining force in social development – such as the mode of production, class, power-relationships or property ownership – while arguing other aspects are less important or current research makes them irrelevant. Despite sharing similar premises, different schools of Marxism might reach contradictory conclusions from each other. For instance, different Marxian economists have contradictory explanations of economic crisis and different predictions for the outcome of such crises. Furthermore, different variants of Marxism apply Marxist analysis to study different aspects of society (e.g. mass culture, economic crises, or sexism).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist understandings of history and of society have been adopted by academics in the disciplines of archaeology and anthropology, media studies, political science, theatre, history, sociology, art history and art theory, cultural studies, education, economics, geography, literary criticism, aesthetics, critical psychology, and philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist analysis begins with an analysis of material conditions, taking at its starting point the necessary economic activities required by human society to provide for its material needs. The form of economic organization, or mode of production, is understood to be the basis from which the majority of other social phenomena – including social relations, political and legal systems, morality and ideology – arise (or at the least by which they are directly influenced). These social relations base the economic system and the economic system forms the superstructure. As the forces of production, most notably technology, improve, existing forms of social organization become inefficient and stifle further progress. As Karl Marx observed: &amp;quot;At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or_ this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These inefficiencies manifest themselves as social contradictions in society in the form of class struggle. Under the capitalist mode of production, this struggle materializes between the minority (the bourgeoisie) who own the means of production, and the vast majority of the population (the proletariat) who produce goods and services. Taking the idea that social change occurs because of the struggle between different classes within society who are under contradiction against each other, leads the Marxist analysis to the conclusion that capitalism exploits and oppresses the proletariat, which leads to a proletarian revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capitalism (according to Marxist theory) can no longer sustain the living standards of the population due to its need to compensate for falling rates of profit by driving down wages, cutting social benefits and pursuing military aggression. The socialist system would succeed capitalism as humanity's mode of production through workers' revolution. According to Marxism, especially arising from Crisis theory, Socialism is a historical necessity (but not an inevitability).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a socialist society private property in the means of production would be superseded by co-operative ownership. A socialist economy would not base production on the creation of private profits, but would instead base production and economic activity on the criteria of satisfying human needs – that is, production would be carried out directly for use. As Engels observed: &amp;quot;Then the capitalist mode of appropriation in which the product enslaves first the producer, and then appropriator, is replaced by the mode of appropriation of the product that is based upon the nature of the modern means of production; upon the one hand, direct social appropriation, as means to the maintenance and extension of production_ on the other, direct individual appropriation, as means of subsistence and of enjoyment.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ethics==&lt;br /&gt;
The belief that Marxism contains no ethical judgements derives from some comments made by Marx and Engels. In [[The Communist Manifesto]], for instance, morality is listed together with law and religion as &amp;quot;bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests&amp;quot;. It is true that for Marx, morality is part of the ideological superstructure of society, is determined by the economic basis, and serves to promote the interests of the ruling class, but it does not follow from this that all morality is to be rejected. What has to be rejected is morality that serves the interests of the ruling class. Once communism has been established and classes have disappeared, however, class morality may be superceded, to what Engels called &amp;quot;a really human morality&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples of bourgeoisie morality are:&lt;br /&gt;
*Capitalists own the proceeds of their investments&lt;br /&gt;
*If someone finds or discovers something first, it belongs to them alone (this is embodied within the notion of [[private property]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Individuals and the ego are of greater importance than the collective&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Key Concepts ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Historical Materialism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Historical materialism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Law of Value ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Law of value]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== Revolution and Dictatorship ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Dictatorship of the Proletariat]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== Communism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Communism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Communism, in Marxism, is the supposed &amp;quot;end goal&amp;quot; of history. It is supposed to come after [[socialism]], when the world is all socialist and opposition to such is virtually gone. It is a stateless, classless, moneyless society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Karl Marx wrote little about communism himself, since he believed that it would be rather pointless to speculate about something that would pretty much be determined by the material conditions of a time way after his, which would be nigh impossible to predict accurately. He considered it idealist to seriously theorize as to how communism will be like, as this would more or less impose what are merely one's ideas as to how communism will be like onto something that is largely determined by material conditions; in absence of actual evidence of such since once again, the material conditions of communism's time are speculative since the future hasn't happened yet, thus cannot really be studied scientifically. Nonetheless, there are a couple of occasions where Marx does write about it, for instance in the [[Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844]]. Therein he describes it as &amp;quot;the riddle of history solved&amp;quot; and as the resolution of various conflicts that have existed throughout all previous history: the conflicts between man and nature, between man and man, between freedom and necessity, and between individual and species.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also mention of communism in [[The German Ideology]], where Marx suggests that in a communist society, the division of labor would not force people into narrow occupational roles. One could, as Marx writes, &amp;quot;hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, breed cattle in the evening, criticize after dinner, just as I like, without ever becoming a hunter, a fisherman, a herdsman, or a critic&amp;quot;. In the same passage, Marx claims that the split between the particular interests of the individual and the common interest of society would disappear under communism. This is in line with his earlier remarks about communism resolving such conflicts as that between man and man, and between the individual and the species, which is a notion crucial to Marx's vision of communism. Marx immediately goes on to say that it is out of this very contradiction between the interest of the individual and the community that the state develops as an independent entity. The overcoming of this contradiction in consequence delegitimizes the state, which thus [[withering away of the state|withers away]] in time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Marx, A Very Short Introduction'' by Peter Singer, Chapter 9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Development ==&lt;br /&gt;
Marxism, as a system of thought, has undergone significant changes since Marx's early writings. In the last years of Marx's life the foundations were laid for a Marxism as a &amp;quot;worldview&amp;quot;, specifically with the publication of ''Anti-Dühring'' by Friedrich Engels in 1877.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Heinrich, Michael. An Introduction to Karl Marx's Capital, p4, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the following years this system of thought would become Orthodox Marxism which, aside from certain revisionist trends, would remain the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; Marxism until the creation of the Soviet Union, at which point Leninist interpretation(s) would dominate Marxist ideological trends. The rise of Leninism, however, would also lead to criticism and innumerable alternative schools of thought within Marxism.&lt;br /&gt;
===Classical Marxism: 1840s to 1880s===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Classical Marxism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
This period can be said to begin with Marx's early writings. In an 1843 letter, Marx outlined his attitude to philosophy, politics, and history:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;On the other hand, '''it is precisely the advantage of the new trend that we do not dogmatically anticipate the world, but only want to find the new world through criticism of the old one.''' Hitherto philosophers have had the solution of all riddles lying in their writing-desks, and the stupid, exoteric world had only to open its mouth for the roast pigeons of absolute knowledge to fly into it. Now philosophy has become mundane, and the most striking proof of this is that philosophical consciousness itself has been drawn into the torment of the struggle, not only externally but also internally. But, if constructing the future and settling everything for all times are not our affair, '''it is all the more clear what we have to accomplish at present: I am referring to ruthless criticism of all that exists,''' ruthless both in the sense of not being afraid of the results it arrives at and in the sense of being just as little afraid of conflict with the powers that be. Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marx, Karl. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/letters/43_09.htm Letter to Arnold Ruge, September 1843].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marx's system of thought would always remain ''critical'' in nature. Although he did give indications of how society would develop, he did not put forward grand schemes or plans for a futuristic society. In his 1881 notes on Adolph Wagner's ''General or Theoretical Economics'', Marx wrote that he never established a &amp;quot;socialist system&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marx, Karl. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1881/01/wagner.htm Notes on Wagner, 1881].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Engels]] on his role in the development of Marxism:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I cannot deny that both before and during my forty years' collaboration with Marx I had a certain independent share in laying the foundations of the theory, but the greater part of its leading basic principles belongs to Marx ... Marx was a genius; we others were at best talented. Without him the theory would not be by far what it is today. It therefore rightly bears his name. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, T.A. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/jackson-ta/pamphlets/engels.htm A Great Socialist, 1935].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite his modesty, Engels' later writings such as [[Anti-Dühring]] helped lay the foundation for a reframing of Marxist ideas. This reframing or re-interpretation would transform Marx's theories into a comprehensive system of thought. This new ideology would later be called &amp;quot;worldview Marxism&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Heinrich, Michael. Ibid.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Orthodox Marxism: 1880s to 1910s===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Orthodox Marxism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
After Karl Marx's death, the followers of his ideas would begin to systematize his thought and reduce it to a series of doctrines that could be easily explained to adherents of the growing socialist movement. It was during this time that Marxist ideas became ''Marxism''. As early as 1896, [[Karl Kautsky]] would describe Marx's ideas as ''Marxism'' and describe himself and other socialists as &amp;quot;we Marxists&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kautsky, Karl. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/kautsky/1896/histmat/hm1.htm The Aims and the Limitations of the Materialist Conception of History, part 1, 1896].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This signalled the transformation of Marx's ideas into a coherent and all-encompassing worldview that included fields such as philosophy, history, economics, and politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the end of the 1890s, the Marxist [[Revisionism|revisionist]] [[Eduard Bernstein]] would write confidently of ''Marxism'' as a singular and coherent theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;No one will deny that the most important element in the foundation of '''Marxism''', the fundamental law so to say which penetrates the whole system, is its specific philosophy of history which bears the name of the materialist interpretation of history. With it '''Marxism''' stands or falls in principle; according to the measure in which it suffers limitations will the position of the other elements towards one another be affected in sympathy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bernstein, Eduard. [https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/bernstein/works/1899/evsoc/ch01.htm Evolutionary Socialism, ch.1, 1899].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not only was Marxism now a coherent worldview with it's own philosophy and theory of history, but also presented as a kind of ''science'' which could be divided into parts that were &amp;quot;pure&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;applied&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Everything in the Marxist characterisation of bourgeois society and its evolution which is unconditioned – that is, everything whose validity is free from national and local peculiarities – would accordingly belong to the domain of '''pure science'''; but everything that refers to temporary and local special phenomena and conjectures, all special forms of development, would on the other hand belong to '''applied science'''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bernstein, Eduard. Ibid.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, this period of Marxist thought would later come under criticism for its reliance on overly &amp;quot;mechanical&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;theoretical&amp;quot; (i.e. non-practical) interpretations of Marxist thought, resulting in an alleged neglect of important problems regarding not only philosophy but also political issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ''Marxism and Philosophy'', Karl Korsch wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The so-called orthodox Marxism of this period (now a mere vulgar-Marxism) appears largely as an attempt by theoreticians, weighed down by tradition, to maintain the theory of social revolution which formed the first version of Marxism, in the shape of pure-theory. This theory was wholly abstract and had no practical consequences - it merely sought to reject the new reformist theories, in which the real character of the historical movement was then expressed as un-Marxist. This is precisely why, in a new revolutionary period, it was the orthodox Marxists of the Second International who were inevitably the least able to cope with such questions as the relation between the State and proletarian revolution.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Korsch, Karl. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/korsch/1923/marxism-philosophy.htm Marxism and Philosphy, 1923].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Leninism: 1910s to 1920s ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Leninism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Vladimir Lenin]], the leader of the Russian Bolsheviks, would advance even further the idea of Marxism as a ''weltanschauung'', or worldview.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In a 1913 article, Lenin wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Marxist doctrine is omnipotent because it is true. It is comprehensive and harmonious, and provides men with an integral world outlook irreconcilable with any form of superstition, reaction, or defence of bourgeois oppression. It is the legitimate successor to the best that man produced in the nineteenth century, as represented by German philosophy, English political economy and French socialism.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lenin, Vladimir. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1913/mar/x01.htm The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism, 1913].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Lenin's ability to simplify Marxism into easily understood &amp;quot;doctrines&amp;quot; would prove to be of great use during the early growth of Leninist parties following the Russian Revolution. After his death, both [[Trotskyism|Trotskyist]] and [[Marxism-Leninism|Marxist-Leninist]] parties would later rely on his formulations in defining and framing Marxism as an ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Western Marxism and Marxism-Leninism: 1920s to 1980s===&lt;br /&gt;
=== Marxist Humanism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Marxist Humanism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== Neo-Marxism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Neo-Marxism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== Analytical Marxism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Analytical Marxism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
A new school of thought within Marxism developed during the 1970s and 1980s. This school attempted to re-interpret core Marxist ideas by applying mathematical and analytical tools to the basic theses of Marxist theory. This school of thought can be said to begin with G.A. Cohen's work ''Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defense'', first published in 1978. In this work Cohen mounts a defense of Marx's theory largely based on &amp;quot;old fashioned historical materialism&amp;quot; in which &amp;quot;history is, fundamentally, the growth of human productive power.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohen, G.A. ''Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defense'', p X, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the introduction written for the new edition of the book in 2000, Cohen wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In each sense of 'analytical', to be analytical is to be opposed to a form of thinking traditionally thought integral to Marxism: analytical thinking, in the broad sense of 'analytical', is opposed to so-called 'dialectical' thinking, and analytical thinking, in the narrow sense of 'analytical', is opposed to what might be called 'holistic' thinking. The fateful operation that created analytical Marxism was the rejection of the claim that Marxism possesses valuable intellectual methods of its own. Rejection of that claim enabled an appropriation of a rich mainstream methodology that Marxism, to its detriment, had shunned.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohen, G.A. Ibid. p XVII, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
John Roemer, another prominent member of the analytical school of thought, considered that typical Marxist theory relied on overly teleological concepts and a lack of explanation for &amp;quot;mechanisms&amp;quot; by which phenomena occur. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a 1985 article, Roemer wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In Marxian social science, dialectics is often used to justify a lazy kind of teleological reasoning.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[...]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Marxists must provide are explanations of ''mechanisms'', at the micro level, or the phenomena they claim come about for teleological reasons.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roemer, John E. 'Rational Choice' Marxism: Some Issues of Method and Substance, 1985.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tendencies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Karl Marx]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Leftism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Das_Kapital&amp;diff=1710513</id>
		<title>Das Kapital</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Das_Kapital&amp;diff=1710513"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:29:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Das Kapital''' (English: Capital) is [[Karl Marx|Karl Marx's]] largest work. It details [[Capitalism]]. There are 3 complete volumes of Das Kapital. While Marx did not live to publish the planned second and third parts, they were both completed from his notes and published after his death by [[Friedrich Engels]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Summary of Volumes ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Volume I ===&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[Capital Volume I]]''&lt;br /&gt;
=== Volume II ===&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[Capital Volume II]]''&lt;br /&gt;
=== Volume III ===&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[Capital Volume III]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Category:Books}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Category:Leftism}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Category:Texts by Marx}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{Category:Media}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Communist_Manifesto&amp;diff=1710512</id>
		<title>The Communist Manifesto</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=The_Communist_Manifesto&amp;diff=1710512"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:29:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''The Communist Manifesto''' is an early [[Communism (ideology)|communist]] pamphlet written by [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]] in 1847 under the title &amp;quot;Manifesto of the Communist Party&amp;quot; and released in 1848. The book consists of a systematical exposition of the ideas and aims of the Communists at that time. As such, the work contains brief explanations of the [[materialist conception of history]], [[class struggle]], and so on. It is divided into four chapters and largely based on Engels' &amp;quot;[[Principles of Communism]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Manifesto is considered by many [[Marxism|Marxists]] to be outdated as far as an understanding of Marxism goes, espousing many positions that Marx and Engels later abandoned (such as imminent annihilation of the middle class, which would actually grow in the following years, something Marx addressed in his 1863 Manuscript, Theories of Surplus Value&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1863/theories-surplus-value/ch04.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==10 &amp;quot;Laws&amp;quot;==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Ten Planks of Communism]] proposed in the Manifesto should be read in the context of their time. Most modern communists, taking changed historical conditions into account, do not propose to actually implement the policies it describes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.&lt;br /&gt;
# A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.&lt;br /&gt;
# Abolition of all rights of inheritance.&lt;br /&gt;
# Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.&lt;br /&gt;
# Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.&lt;br /&gt;
# Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.&lt;br /&gt;
# Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.&lt;br /&gt;
# Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.&lt;br /&gt;
# Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.&lt;br /&gt;
# Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc., etc.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{NavTMarxEng|Both-state=expanded}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20160608125156/http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/index.htm Full text of the Communist Manifesto in English.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Texts]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberalism&amp;diff=1710508</id>
		<title>Liberalism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Liberalism&amp;diff=1710508"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:26:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Liberalism''' is a political and economic philosophy whose basis is on liberty, consent of the governed, and equality before the law.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;liberalism In general, the belief that it is the aim of politics to preserve individual rights and to maximize freedom of choice.&amp;quot; ''Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics'', Iain McLean and Alistair McMillan, Third edition 2009, {{ISBN|978-0-19-920516-5}}.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;political rationalism, hostility to autocracy, cultural distaste for conservatism and for tradition in general, tolerance, and [...] individualism&amp;quot;. John Dunn. ''Western Political Theory in the Face of the Future'' (1993). Cambridge University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-521-43755-4}}.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;With a nod to Robert Trivers' definition of altruistic behaviour&amp;quot; Trivers et al., 1971, page 35), Satoshi Kanazawa defines liberalism (as opposed to conservatism) as &amp;quot;the genuine concern for the welfare of genetically unrelated others and the willingness to contribute larger proportions of private resources for the welfare of such others&amp;quot; (Kanazawa et al., 2010, page 38).&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support free markets, free trade, limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), [[capitalism]], [[democracy]], secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, and freedom of speech, the press, and of religion.&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;LInternational&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite web|url=http://www.liberal-international.org/editorial.asp?ia_id=537|title=The Liberal Agenda for the 21st Century|access-date=20 March 2015|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110207012341/http://www.liberal-international.org/editorial.asp?ia_id=537|archive-date=7 February 2011}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Nader Hashemi&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UkVIYjezrF0C&amp;amp;dq=liberalism+secularism|author=Nader Hashemi|title=Islam, Secularism, and Liberal Democracy: Toward a Democratic Theory for Muslim Societies|publisher=Oxford University Press|quote=Liberal democracy requires a form of secularism to sustain itself|year=2009|isbn=978-0-19-971751-4}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Kathleen G. Donohue&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=htuTnexZAo8C&amp;amp;pg=PA1&amp;amp;dq=liberalism+freedom+of+religion#v=onepage|author=Kathleen G. Donohue|title=Freedom from Want: American Liberalism and the Idea of the Consumer (New Studies in American Intellectual and Cultural History)|publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press|quote=Three of them – freedom from fear, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion – have long been fundamental to liberalism.|isbn=978-0-8018-7426-0|date=19 December 2003|access-date=31 December 2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;The Economist&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite journal|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KBzHAAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;q=liberalism+freedom+of+religion&amp;amp;dq=liberalism+freedom+of+religion|title=The Economist, Volume 341, Issues 7995–7997|journal=The Economist|quote=For all three share a belief in the liberal society as defined above: a society that provides constitutional government (rule by law, not by men) and freedom of religion, thought, expression and economic interaction; a society in which [...]|year=1996|access-date=31 December 2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Sheldon S. Wolin&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ndAdGl8ScfcC&amp;amp;pg=PA525&amp;amp;dq=liberalism+freedom+of+religion#v=onepage|author=Sehldon S. Wolin|title=Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought|publisher=Princeton University Press|quote=The most frequently cited rights included freedom of speech, press, assembly, religion, property, and procedural rights|isbn=978-0-691-11977-9|year=2004|access-date=31 December 2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Edwin Brown Firmage, Bernard G. Weiss, John Woodland Welch&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mQJgnEITPRIC&amp;amp;pg=PA366&amp;amp;dq=liberalism+freedom+of+religion#v=onepage|author1=Edwin Brown Firmage|author2=Bernard G. Weiss|author3=John Woodland Welch|title=Religion and Law: Biblical-Judaic and Islamic Perspectives|publisher=Eisenbrauns|quote=There is no need to expound the foundations and principles of modern liberalism, which emphasises the values of freedom of conscience and freedom of religion |isbn=978-0-931464-39-3|year=1990 |access-date=31 December 2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;John Joseph Lalor&amp;quot;&amp;gt;{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/cyclopaediapoli00lalogoog|page=[https://archive.org/details/cyclopaediapoli00lalogoog/page/n758 760]|first=John Joseph|last=Lalor|title=Cyclopædia of Political Science, Political Economy, and of the Political History of the United States|publisher=Nabu Press|quote=Democracy attaches itself to a form of government: liberalism, to liberty and guarantees of liberty. The two may agree; they are not contradictory, but they are neither identical, nor necessarily connected. In the moral order, liberalism is the liberty to think, recognised and practiced. This is primordial liberalism, as the liberty to think is itself the first and noblest of liberties. Man would not be free in any degree or in any sphere of action, if he were not a thinking being endowed with consciousness. The freedom of worship, the freedom of education, and the freedom of the press are derived the most directly from the freedom to think.|year=1883|access-date=31 December 2007}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are three main types of liberalism:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Social liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Conservative liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Classical liberalism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Relation to socialism==&lt;br /&gt;
Liberals are not [[socialism|socialists]], and at most have somewhat of an inclination or sympathy towards such. Liberals tend to be unaware of legitimate critical theory but may side at times with socialism nonetheless either because they believe in forming a popular front or because they have a misconception about what socialism is (most commonly, this manifests as a liberal’s desire for what they believe to be socialism, when really they just focus on the achievement of welfare, not to change the relations to the means of production per se). Marxism rejects liberal reform of capitalism, considering reform to be a bandage that cannot reconcile the inherent contradictions to capitalism. Regardless, liberals on the path to class consciousness are generally considerable allies and have a place within the socialist movement, particularly at first when uniting against reactionary and other anti-socialist forces (wherein there is the establishment of a popular front).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_centralism&amp;diff=1710505</id>
		<title>Democratic centralism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Democratic_centralism&amp;diff=1710505"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:24:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''Democratic centralism''' is a [[Leninism|Leninist]] democratic practice in which political decisions reached by voting processes are binding upon all members of the party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== In practice ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In party meetings, a motion (new policy or amendment, goal, plan or any other kind of political question) is proposed. After a period of debate, a vote is taken. If one vote clearly wins (gaining 60% or above share if two options for example) all participants (the party) are expected to follow that decision, and not continue propagandising or otherwise working against it, aiming to act in unity. If participants still disagree, instead of splitting and forming another party as in [[Representative Democracy]] they are expected to table a motion for discussing the issue again. In the development of [[socialism]] in the Soviet Union and China, it was largely taken up in response to dramatic developments and violence which required faster mechanisms of making decisions. A constellation of practices surround this in order to encourage participation and debate, such as Don't Blame the Speaker. &amp;lt;ref name=criticism&amp;gt;{{cite web|author=Mao Tse Tung|year=1944|url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/red-book/ch15.htm|title=Mao Tse Tung Quotations from Mao Tse Tung 15. Democracy in the Three Main Fields |accessdate=9 August 2002}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Organization]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marxism%E2%80%93Leninism&amp;diff=1710503</id>
		<title>Marxism–Leninism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marxism%E2%80%93Leninism&amp;diff=1710503"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:24:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Foundations of Leninism.jpg|thumb|Joseph Stalin's 'Foundations of Leninism' was originally a series a lectures delivered in 1924. This text would begin the creation of a new official Marxism and establish an ideological line between Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Stalin.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Marxism-Leninism''' was the official ideology of the USSR. It developed after [[Lenin|Lenin's]] death when competing factions within the Soviet leadership attempted to establish their legitimacy as Lenin's political successors. Soviet leaders such as Leon Trotsky, Grigory Zinoviev, and Joseph Stalin wrote works developing the concept of a specifically [[Leninism|Leninist]] ideology. Joseph Stalin coined the term to describe an ideology which considers Lenin's political thought to be a necessary development of Marxism, and made the term popular through ''The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks)'' (1938).&lt;br /&gt;
==Background==&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote|See also: [[Leninism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
(factional struggle between Trotsky and Stalin/Zinoviev/Kamenev/Bukharin)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(Bolshevization campaign)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(consolidation of Marxism-Leninism)&lt;br /&gt;
==Marxist-Leninist Ideology==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Democratic centralism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote|Main article: [[Democratic centralism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
A Marxist-Leninist party is organized according to democratic centralism. This means that first the party democratically decides something, and then all members are required to follow that decision and not work against it. If members still disagree with the decision, they are expected to request to discuss the issue again, not to form a faction or another party.&lt;br /&gt;
=== Socialism in one country ===&lt;br /&gt;
(socialism in one country)&lt;br /&gt;
=== Political economy, crises and revolution ===&lt;br /&gt;
(political economy, crises, &amp;amp; revolution)&lt;br /&gt;
=== The lower phase of communism, aka socialism ===&lt;br /&gt;
(the lower phase of communism aka socialism)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Other Forms ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Maoism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote|Main article: [[Maoism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== Hoxhaism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote|Main article: [[Hoxhaism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Criticisms==&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote|Main article: [[Criticisms of Marxism-Leninism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist critics argue that Marxism-Leninism works from the assumption that the Soviet Union was a socialist society and use this as reference point to navigate both political theory and practice. The consequence of this being that Marxism-Leninism is reconciled with bourgeois concepts such as the nation-state and nationalism. The most common criticism of Marxism-Leninism from Trotskyists is that rather than seeking to spread the socialist revolution throughout the world through direct revolutionary action, hence pursuing &amp;quot;Proletarian Internationalism,&amp;quot; Stalin instead only assisted existing socialist revolutions, believing that the Soviet Union was the only country in the world capable of achieving socialism due to the success of its own revolution, and actually enacted a foreign policy of &amp;quot;peaceful coexistence&amp;quot; with the Western capitalist powers. {{cn}} Stalin named this theory Socialism in one country.&lt;br /&gt;
===Trotsky===&lt;br /&gt;
(Trotskyism aka Bolshevik-Leninism)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;(Trotsky's criticism of Marxism-Leninism)&lt;br /&gt;
===Bordiga===&lt;br /&gt;
===Paul Mattick===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
http://en.internationalism.org/ir/96/leninists&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;https://isreview.org/issue/93/zinovievism-and-degeneration-world-communism&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;https://archive.org/details/25ZinovievLeninizm&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/ni/vol10/no03/trotsky.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;https://libcom.org/library/revolutionary-alternative-left-wing-politics&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;''The History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (Bolsheviks)'' (1938)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tendencies]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marxism&amp;diff=1710495</id>
		<title>Marxism</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Marxism&amp;diff=1710495"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:19:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:anti-duhring.jpg|thumb|254x383px|''Anti-Dühring'' was a foundational text in the development of &amp;quot;worldview Marxism&amp;quot;. Visible in the 1939 edition is a portrait of Lenin and the adoption of [[Marxism-Leninism]] as the officially &amp;quot;updated&amp;quot; worldview of Marxism.]]&lt;br /&gt;
'''Marxism''' is the name given to a set of ideas, theories, and political ideologies that developed out of the works of Karl Marx. The term itself is difficult to define due to conflicting interpretations. After Marx's death, the term Marxism came to describe a holistic worldview (German: ''Weltanschauung'') that included theories of philosophy, history, politics, economics, and science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Etymology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxism is derived from the name of German philosopher [[Karl Marx]]. The term was popularized by [[Karl Kautsky]] who considered himself an [[Orthodox Marxism|&amp;quot;orthodox&amp;quot; Marxist]] during the dispute between the orthodox and revisionist followers of Marx. Kautsky's revisionist rival [[Eduard Bernstein]] also later adopted use of the term. [[Friedrich Engels|Engels]] did not support the use of the term &amp;quot;Marxism&amp;quot; to describe either Marx's or his views. Engels claimed that the term was being abusively used as a rhetorical qualifier by those attempting to cast themselves as &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; followers of Marx while casting others in different terms, such as &amp;quot;Lassallians&amp;quot;. In 1882, Engels claimed that Marx had criticized self-proclaimed &amp;quot;Marxist&amp;quot; [[Paul Lafargue]], by saying that if Lafargue's views were considered &amp;quot;Marxist&amp;quot;, then &amp;quot;One thing is certain and that is that I am not a Marxist&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Letter to Bernstein, 1882.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Overview ==&lt;br /&gt;
Marxism can roughly be defined as the application of the materialist method to the study of social phenomena. It regards the material conditions and class conflict as driving forces behind historical social development -- Marxism stresses the causal effects of material conditions and class conflict. Marxism primarily focuses on explaining society and history.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to establish a precise definition and framing of Marxism can depend on the emphasis preferred by a theoretician on one aspect of the method over another. The complexity of Marx's writings allows for misreadings, misinterpretations, and misplacing emphasis, and enables abuse. Arguably, Marxism as comprehensive world view originated after Marx's death from the efforts of Karl Kautsky, Friedrich Engels, and Georgi Plekhanov. Classical Marxism is based on the writings of [[Karl Marx]] and [[Friedrich Engels]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxism is not an ideology. It is strictly a method of social analysis. Scientific socialism is a socialist political ideology based around Marxist theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Placing different emphasis on different aspects of Marxist analysis produces different branches of Marxism. Different schools place a greater emphasis on certain aspects of classical Marxism while de-emphasizing or rejecting other aspects of Marxism, sometimes combining Marxist analysis with non-Marxian concepts. Some variants of Marxism primarily focus on one aspect of Marxism as the determining force in social development – such as the mode of production, class, power-relationships or property ownership – while arguing other aspects are less important or current research makes them irrelevant. Despite sharing similar premises, different schools of Marxism might reach contradictory conclusions from each other. For instance, different Marxian economists have contradictory explanations of economic crisis and different predictions for the outcome of such crises. Furthermore, different variants of Marxism apply Marxist analysis to study different aspects of society (e.g. mass culture, economic crises, or sexism).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist understandings of history and of society have been adopted by academics in the disciplines of archaeology and anthropology, media studies, political science, theatre, history, sociology, art history and art theory, cultural studies, education, economics, geography, literary criticism, aesthetics, critical psychology, and philosophy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marxist analysis begins with an analysis of material conditions, taking at its starting point the necessary economic activities required by human society to provide for its material needs. The form of economic organization, or mode of production, is understood to be the basis from which the majority of other social phenomena – including social relations, political and legal systems, morality and ideology – arise (or at the least by which they are directly influenced). These social relations base the economic system and the economic system forms the superstructure. As the forces of production, most notably technology, improve, existing forms of social organization become inefficient and stifle further progress. As Karl Marx observed: &amp;quot;At a certain stage of development, the material productive forces of society come into conflict with the existing relations of production or_ this merely expresses the same thing in legal terms with the property relations within the framework of which they have operated hitherto. From forms of development of the productive forces these relations turn into their fetters. Then begins an era of social revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These inefficiencies manifest themselves as social contradictions in society in the form of class struggle. Under the capitalist mode of production, this struggle materializes between the minority (the bourgeoisie) who own the means of production, and the vast majority of the population (the proletariat) who produce goods and services. Taking the idea that social change occurs because of the struggle between different classes within society who are under contradiction against each other, leads the Marxist analysis to the conclusion that capitalism exploits and oppresses the proletariat, which leads to a proletarian revolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Capitalism (according to Marxist theory) can no longer sustain the living standards of the population due to its need to compensate for falling rates of profit by driving down wages, cutting social benefits and pursuing military aggression. The socialist system would succeed capitalism as humanity's mode of production through workers' revolution. According to Marxism, especially arising from Crisis theory, Socialism is a historical necessity (but not an inevitability).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a socialist society private property in the means of production would be superseded by co-operative ownership. A socialist economy would not base production on the creation of private profits, but would instead base production and economic activity on the criteria of satisfying human needs – that is, production would be carried out directly for use. As Engels observed: &amp;quot;Then the capitalist mode of appropriation in which the product enslaves first the producer, and then appropriator, is replaced by the mode of appropriation of the product that is based upon the nature of the modern means of production; upon the one hand, direct social appropriation, as means to the maintenance and extension of production_ on the other, direct individual appropriation, as means of subsistence and of enjoyment.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ethics==&lt;br /&gt;
The belief that Marxism contains no ethical judgements derives from some comments made by Marx and Engels. In [[The Communist Manifesto]], for instance, morality is listed together with law and religion as &amp;quot;bourgeois prejudices, behind which lurk in ambush just as many bourgeois interests&amp;quot;. It is true that for Marx, morality is part of the ideological superstructure of society, is determined by the economic basis, and serves to promote the interests of the ruling class, but it does not follow from this that all morality is to be rejected. What has to be rejected is morality that serves the interests of the ruling class. Once communism has been established and classes have disappeared, however, class morality may be superceded, to what Engels called &amp;quot;a really human morality&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Examples of bourgeoisie morality are:&lt;br /&gt;
*Capitalists own the proceeds of their investments&lt;br /&gt;
*If someone finds or discovers something first, it belongs to them alone (this is embodied within the notion of [[private property]])&lt;br /&gt;
*Individuals and the ego are of greater importance than the collective&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Key Concepts ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== Historical Materialism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Historical materialism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Law of Value ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Law of value]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== Revolution and Dictatorship ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Dictatorship of the Proletariat]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== Communism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Communism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Communism, in Marxism, is the supposed &amp;quot;end goal&amp;quot; of history. It is supposed to come after [[socialism]], when the world is all socialist and opposition to such is virtually gone. It is a stateless, classless, moneyless society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Karl Marx wrote little about communism himself, since he believed that it would be rather pointless to speculate about something that would pretty much be determined by the material conditions of a time way after his, which would be nigh impossible to predict accurately. He considered it idealist to seriously theorize as to how communism will be like, as this would more or less impose what are merely one's ideas as to how communism will be like onto something that is largely determined by material conditions; in absence of actual evidence of such since once again, the material conditions of communism's time are speculative since the future hasn't happened yet, thus cannot really be studied scientifically. Nonetheless, there are a couple of occasions where Marx does write about it, for instance in the [[Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844]]. Therein he describes it as &amp;quot;the riddle of history solved&amp;quot; and as the resolution of various conflicts that have existed throughout all previous history: the conflicts between man and nature, between man and man, between freedom and necessity, and between individual and species.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also mention of communism in [[The German Ideology]], where Marx suggests that in a communist society, the division of labor would not force people into narrow occupational roles. One could, as Marx writes, &amp;quot;hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, breed cattle in the evening, criticize after dinner, just as I like, without ever becoming a hunter, a fisherman, a herdsman, or a critic&amp;quot;. In the same passage, Marx claims that the split between the particular interests of the individual and the common interest of society would disappear under communism. This is in line with his earlier remarks about communism resolving such conflicts as that between man and man, and between the individual and the species, which is a notion crucial to Marx's vision of communism. Marx immediately goes on to say that it is out of this very contradiction between the interest of the individual and the community that the state develops as an independent entity. The overcoming of this contradiction in consequence delegitimizes the state, which thus [[withering away of the state|withers away]] in time.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;''Marx, A Very Short Introduction'' by Peter Singer, Chapter 9&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Development ==&lt;br /&gt;
Marxism, as a system of thought, has undergone significant changes since Marx's early writings. In the last years of Marx's life the foundations were laid for a Marxism as a &amp;quot;worldview&amp;quot;, specifically with the publication of ''Anti-Dühring'' by Friedrich Engels in 1877.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Heinrich, Michael. An Introduction to Karl Marx's Capital, p4, 2004.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In the following years this system of thought would become Orthodox Marxism which, aside from certain revisionist trends, would remain the &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; Marxism until the creation of the Soviet Union, at which point Leninist interpretation(s) would dominate Marxist ideological trends. The rise of Leninism, however, would also lead to criticism and innumerable alternative schools of thought within Marxism.&lt;br /&gt;
===Classical Marxism: 1840s to 1880s===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Classical Marxism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
This period can be said to begin with Marx's early writings. In an 1843 letter, Marx outlined his attitude to philosophy, politics, and history:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;On the other hand, '''it is precisely the advantage of the new trend that we do not dogmatically anticipate the world, but only want to find the new world through criticism of the old one.''' Hitherto philosophers have had the solution of all riddles lying in their writing-desks, and the stupid, exoteric world had only to open its mouth for the roast pigeons of absolute knowledge to fly into it. Now philosophy has become mundane, and the most striking proof of this is that philosophical consciousness itself has been drawn into the torment of the struggle, not only externally but also internally. But, if constructing the future and settling everything for all times are not our affair, '''it is all the more clear what we have to accomplish at present: I am referring to ruthless criticism of all that exists,''' ruthless both in the sense of not being afraid of the results it arrives at and in the sense of being just as little afraid of conflict with the powers that be. Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marx, Karl. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/letters/43_09.htm Letter to Arnold Ruge, September 1843].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marx's system of thought would always remain ''critical'' in nature. Although he did give indications of how society would develop, he did not put forward grand schemes or plans for a futuristic society. In his 1881 notes on Adolph Wagner's ''General or Theoretical Economics'', Marx wrote that he never established a &amp;quot;socialist system&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Marx, Karl. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1881/01/wagner.htm Notes on Wagner, 1881].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Engels]] on his role in the development of Marxism:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;I cannot deny that both before and during my forty years' collaboration with Marx I had a certain independent share in laying the foundations of the theory, but the greater part of its leading basic principles belongs to Marx ... Marx was a genius; we others were at best talented. Without him the theory would not be by far what it is today. It therefore rightly bears his name. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Jackson, T.A. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/jackson-ta/pamphlets/engels.htm A Great Socialist, 1935].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite his modesty, Engels' later writings such as [[Anti-Dühring]] helped lay the foundation for a reframing of Marxist ideas. This reframing or re-interpretation would transform Marx's theories into a comprehensive system of thought. This new ideology would later be called &amp;quot;worldview Marxism&amp;quot;. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Heinrich, Michael. Ibid.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Orthodox Marxism: 1880s to 1910s===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Orthodox Marxism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
After Karl Marx's death, the followers of his ideas would begin to systematize his thought and reduce it to a series of doctrines that could be easily explained to adherents of the growing socialist movement. It was during this time that Marxist ideas became ''Marxism''. As early as 1896, [[Karl Kautsky]] would describe Marx's ideas as ''Marxism'' and describe himself and other socialists as &amp;quot;we Marxists&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Kautsky, Karl. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/kautsky/1896/histmat/hm1.htm The Aims and the Limitations of the Materialist Conception of History, part 1, 1896].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This signalled the transformation of Marx's ideas into a coherent and all-encompassing worldview that included fields such as philosophy, history, economics, and politics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the end of the 1890s, the Marxist [[Revisionism|revisionist]] [[Eduard Bernstein]] would write confidently of ''Marxism'' as a singular and coherent theory.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;No one will deny that the most important element in the foundation of '''Marxism''', the fundamental law so to say which penetrates the whole system, is its specific philosophy of history which bears the name of the materialist interpretation of history. With it '''Marxism''' stands or falls in principle; according to the measure in which it suffers limitations will the position of the other elements towards one another be affected in sympathy.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bernstein, Eduard. [https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/bernstein/works/1899/evsoc/ch01.htm Evolutionary Socialism, ch.1, 1899].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not only was Marxism now a coherent worldview with it's own philosophy and theory of history, but also presented as a kind of ''science'' which could be divided into parts that were &amp;quot;pure&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;applied&amp;quot;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Everything in the Marxist characterisation of bourgeois society and its evolution which is unconditioned – that is, everything whose validity is free from national and local peculiarities – would accordingly belong to the domain of '''pure science'''; but everything that refers to temporary and local special phenomena and conjectures, all special forms of development, would on the other hand belong to '''applied science'''.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Bernstein, Eduard. Ibid.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nonetheless, this period of Marxist thought would later come under criticism for its reliance on overly &amp;quot;mechanical&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;theoretical&amp;quot; (i.e. non-practical) interpretations of Marxist thought, resulting in an alleged neglect of important problems regarding not only philosophy but also political issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In ''Marxism and Philosophy'', Karl Korsch wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The so-called orthodox Marxism of this period (now a mere vulgar-Marxism) appears largely as an attempt by theoreticians, weighed down by tradition, to maintain the theory of social revolution which formed the first version of Marxism, in the shape of pure-theory. This theory was wholly abstract and had no practical consequences - it merely sought to reject the new reformist theories, in which the real character of the historical movement was then expressed as un-Marxist. This is precisely why, in a new revolutionary period, it was the orthodox Marxists of the Second International who were inevitably the least able to cope with such questions as the relation between the State and proletarian revolution.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Korsch, Karl. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/korsch/1923/marxism-philosophy.htm Marxism and Philosphy, 1923].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Leninism: 1910s to 1920s ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Leninism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Vladimir Lenin]], the leader of the Russian Bolsheviks, would advance even further the idea of Marxism as a ''weltanschauung'', or worldview.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In a 1913 article, Lenin wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The Marxist doctrine is omnipotent because it is true. It is comprehensive and harmonious, and provides men with an integral world outlook irreconcilable with any form of superstition, reaction, or defence of bourgeois oppression. It is the legitimate successor to the best that man produced in the nineteenth century, as represented by German philosophy, English political economy and French socialism.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lenin, Vladimir. [https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1913/mar/x01.htm The Three Sources and Three Component Parts of Marxism, 1913].&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Lenin's ability to simplify Marxism into easily understood &amp;quot;doctrines&amp;quot; would prove to be of great use during the early growth of Leninist parties following the Russian Revolution. After his death, both [[Trotskyism|Trotskyist]] and [[Marxism-Leninism|Marxist-Leninist]] parties would later rely on his formulations in defining and framing Marxism as an ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Western Marxism and Marxism-Leninism: 1920s to 1980s===&lt;br /&gt;
=== Marxist Humanism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Marxist Humanism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== Neo-Marxism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Neo-Marxism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
=== Analytical Marxism ===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote| See also: [[Analytical Marxism]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
A new school of thought within Marxism developed during the 1970s and 1980s. This school attempted to re-interpret core Marxist ideas by applying mathematical and analytical tools to the basic theses of Marxist theory. This school of thought can be said to begin with G.A. Cohen's work ''Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defense'', first published in 1978. In this work Cohen mounts a defense of Marx's theory largely based on &amp;quot;old fashioned historical materialism&amp;quot; in which &amp;quot;history is, fundamentally, the growth of human productive power.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohen, G.A. ''Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defense'', p X, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the introduction written for the new edition of the book in 2000, Cohen wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In each sense of 'analytical', to be analytical is to be opposed to a form of thinking traditionally thought integral to Marxism: analytical thinking, in the broad sense of 'analytical', is opposed to so-called 'dialectical' thinking, and analytical thinking, in the narrow sense of 'analytical', is opposed to what might be called 'holistic' thinking. The fateful operation that created analytical Marxism was the rejection of the claim that Marxism possesses valuable intellectual methods of its own. Rejection of that claim enabled an appropriation of a rich mainstream methodology that Marxism, to its detriment, had shunned.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Cohen, G.A. Ibid. p XVII, 2000.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
John Roemer, another prominent member of the analytical school of thought, considered that typical Marxist theory relied on overly teleological concepts and a lack of explanation for &amp;quot;mechanisms&amp;quot; by which phenomena occur. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a 1985 article, Roemer wrote:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In Marxian social science, dialectics is often used to justify a lazy kind of teleological reasoning.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[...]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;What Marxists must provide are explanations of ''mechanisms'', at the micro level, or the phenomena they claim come about for teleological reasons.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Roemer, John E. 'Rational Choice' Marxism: Some Issues of Method and Substance, 1985.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tendencies]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Karl Marx]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Marxism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Materialism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Philosophy]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Leftism]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communism]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dictatorship_of_the_proletariat&amp;diff=1710492</id>
		<title>Dictatorship of the proletariat</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Dictatorship_of_the_proletariat&amp;diff=1710492"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:16:47Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The '''revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat''' (DOTP) is a concept in [[Marxism]] referring to a transient [[state]] constructed in the [[Socialist transition|transition period]] of social reconstruction coinciding with the social [[socialist revolution|revolution]]. The DOTP, originating out of an intensified open [[class warfare|class war]] is a state form which makes it possible to socialise the [[means of production]] which &amp;quot;gives [the] socialized character [of production the] complete freedom to work itself out. Socialized production upon a [[economic planning|predetermined plan]] becomes henceforth possible&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Engels. Socialism: Utopian and Scientific. Chapter III - Historical Materialism&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; This allows for a transition from the [[capitalism|capitalist]] to the [[communism|communist]] [[mode of production]]. The term 'dictatorship' is not related to an individual's dictatorship: in the DOTP, all public office is elected and recallable by the general or concerned population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Engels. 1891 Introduction by Frederick Engels On the 20th Anniversary of the Paris Commune to &amp;quot;The Civil War in France&amp;quot;. &amp;quot;Against this transformation of the state and the organs of the state from servants of society into masters of society – an inevitable transformation in all previous states – the Commune made use of two infallible expedients. In this first place, it filled all posts – administrative, judicial, and educational – by election on the basis of universal suffrage of all concerned, with the right of the same electors to recall their delegate at any time. [...] Of late, the Social-Democratic philistine has once more been filled with wholesome terror at the words: Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Well and good, gentlemen, do you want to know what this dictatorship looks like? Look at the Paris Commune. That was the Dictatorship of the Proletariat.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The dictatorship of the proletariat is the [[government]] that is to exist following a [[proletariat|proletarian]] revolution. The &amp;quot;dictatorship&amp;quot; prescribed by [[Marx]] is in no way related to its traditional definition (absolute rule by a single despot), or any other autocratic government ([[oligarchy]], [[single-party state]], etc.), but rather, a [[democracy|democratic]] government in which the people have absolute power. Marx used the term &amp;quot;Dictatorship of the Proletariat&amp;quot; sparsely so as not incite any notions of despotism. The term has its origins in the [[Roman Republic]], where the term &amp;quot;Dictator&amp;quot; originated. In the Roman Republic, during times of crisis, a dictatorship was installed temporarily to provide strong leadership.[26] While this is not the form of the dictatorship of the proletariat, it is still a dictatorship not meant to be permanent (as the state must &amp;quot;wither away&amp;quot; under the dictatorship of the proletariat. See &amp;quot;What Gurantee do you have that it will wither away?&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later, during the [[French Revolution]], the idea of a temporary, revolutionary dictatorship became a part of the program of the [[Jacobins]] and &amp;quot;[[Conspiracy of Equals]].&amp;quot; However, their conceptions of dictatorship differed from that of Marx's, in that instead of advocating a direct dictatorship of the people, they advocated a dictatorship of the people's interests. The Jacobins established a fanatical revolutionary regime and initiated the infamous &amp;quot;[[Reign of Terror]],&amp;quot; with the intent of purging the country of all [[counter-revolution|counter-revolutionaries]] and foreign agents. Following the overthrow of the Jacobins, a new society advocating revolutionary dictatorship emerged, the aforementioned &amp;quot;Conspiracy of Equals.&amp;quot; While not using the term &amp;quot;dictatorship,&amp;quot; their programs made clear that they advocated a closed dictatorship of revolutionaries. Yet their motives for such a dictatorship were not so much in paranoia as the Jacobins, but in concern for the masses, whom they feared were too conservative and unenlightened for revolutionary purposes. Their platform promised the eventual establishment of a democratic republic, but only once the preceding dictatorial government recognized them as &amp;quot;enlightened.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Marx and [[Engels]], while admiring their dedication to the proletariat, dismissed their notions of conspiratorial and exclusive organization, as well as their notions of Dictatorship. Marx formulated the dictatorship of the proletariat not as an emergency termination of democracy, but as the extension of the democracy of the previous regime. As Friedrich Engels said, &amp;quot;...If one thing is certain it is that our party and the working class can only come to power under the form of a democratic republic. This is even the specific form for the dictatorship of the proletariat...&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Etymology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Marx used the term dictatorship it corresponded to the meaning of 'dictator' in Roman Law. In the Roman Republic, the dictator (“one who dictates”), was an extraordinary magistrate (magistratus extraordinarius) with the absolute authority to perform tasks beyond the authority of the ordinary magistrate (magistratus ordinarius). The office of dictator was a legal innovation originally named Magister Populi (Master of the People), i.e., Master of the Citizen Army. The dictatorial powers of the dictator were possessed temporarily only for the durability of the civil insurrection that he was meant to crush. The word 'dictatorship' in the sense that Marx used it in inherently conveyed the meaning of temporary powers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Hal Draper, 1987. The 'Dictatorship of the Proletariat' in Marx and Engels&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Hence, Marx speaks of a &amp;quot;dictatorship of the bourgeoisie&amp;quot; only by specifically referencing Cavaignac: &amp;quot;he was the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie&amp;quot;. Gavaignac crushed a workers' uprising and relinquished power after he had done so, consistent with the use of dictatorship in that time period.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The term 'dictatorship' does therefore not convey oppression or subjugation as is sometimes argued. Marxists such as [[Hal Draper]] argue on this basis that the dictatorship of the proletariat (a sort of temporary emergency measure) cannot be equated with general bourgeois class rule (indefinite). Later followers of Marx, including [[Lenin]], used it generally, referring to all bourgeois class rule as a [[dictatorship of the bourgeoisie]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also referred to as revolutionary dictatorship; or, dictatorship of the proletariat; or, workers' state; or, Republic of Labour; or, workers' republic; or, workers' government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Party ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some [[orthodox Marxism|orthodox Marxists]] have argued that the dictatorship of the proletariat may be intra-party organs within a mass party-movement of the majority of the working class.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Amadeo Bordiga]] considers the [[Communist Party]] the organic unity of the proletariat. The dictatorship of the proletariat is therefore the dictatorship of the communist party. The Party would assume power and as the state withers away the Party would be transformed into a central administration that would be responsible for decision-making on the basis of the scientific method. Neither the Party nor the central administration would be subject to democratic control arguing that majority decision-making doesn't make it the correct decision. The correctness of decisions would be established on the basis of science.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;John CRUMP. Non-market socialism in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire : Macmillan, 1987. https://bataillesocialiste.wordpress.com/english-pages/1987-bordigism-buick/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Withering away of the State ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[withering away of the state]] was first used by Friedrich Engels in [[Anti-Dühring]]: &amp;quot;State interference in social relations becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. The state is not &amp;quot;abolished&amp;quot;. It dies out [It withers away].&amp;quot;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Engels, F. (1877). Anti-Dühring. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1877/anti-duhring/ch24.htm&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The state originated from [[class society]] and class antagonisms. The revolutionary dictatorship is the body of class rule against the bourgeoisie and its [[reaction]]. The withering away of the state occurs because of the disappearance of class antagonisms and the abolition of social classes. The revolutionary dictatorship uses coercion against the reaction to consolidate its power, as the reaction is beaten these types of coercive functions of the workers' state gradually disappear proportionally to the intensity of the reaction (as the reaction dwindles, so does the coercion employed). The working class organs of the revolutionary dictatorship are organically transformed into administrative organs of [[free association]] of equal individuals. The state disappears not because of a voluntary abdication of power by the ruling class but because the specific organs for class rule are transformed into organs of voluntary association around [[common ownership]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Union_of_Soviet_Socialist_Republics&amp;diff=1710491</id>
		<title>Union of Soviet Socialist Republics</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Union_of_Soviet_Socialist_Republics&amp;diff=1710491"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:15:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;float:right; margin: 0px 0px 0px 20px;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; | Union of Soviet Socialist Republics&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;small&amp;gt;Сою́з Сове́тских Социалисти́ческих Респу́блик&amp;lt;/small&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=&amp;quot;2&amp;quot; |[[File:800px-Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (orthographic projection).svg.png|frameless|300x300|center|The Soviet Union]]&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;text-align:center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Map of the USSR&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;width:50%; border:none; text-align:center; vertical-align:bottom; padding-top: 5px;&amp;quot; |[[File:Ussrflag.jpg|125x63px|frameless|Flag of the Soviet Union]] &lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;width:50%; border:none; text-align:center; vertical-align:bottom; padding-top: 5px;&amp;quot; | [[File:State Emblem of the Soviet Union.svg.png|85x88px|frameless|Emblem of the Soviet Union]] &lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;width:50%; border:none; text-align:center;&amp;quot; | Flag &lt;br /&gt;
| style=&amp;quot;width:50%; border:none; text-align:center;&amp;quot; | State Emblem &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
The '''Union of Soviet Socialist Republics''' ('''USSR'''; or in Russian &amp;quot;СССР&amp;quot;), also known as the '''Soviet Union''', was a [[Marxism-Leninism|Marxist-Leninist]] state on the Eurasian continent that existed between 1922 and 1991. It was governed as a single-party state by the [[Communist Party of the Soviet Union]] with Moscow as its capital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Russian Revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
The RSFSR (Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic) emerged out of the [[Russian Revolution of 1917]], with [[Bolshevism|Bolshevik]] revolutionary [[Vladimir Lenin]] as its first president. The new government created a constitution establishing itself as a Socialist republic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Red vs. White Civil War===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1918, following the seizure of power by the Bolsheviks, a civil war between the Bolsheviks (or ‘Reds’) and the remaining monarchists (the ‘Whites’), along with various disgruntled social democrats and liberals such as their rival faction, the Mensheviks, tore apart the RSFSR. Despite support from the capitalist Western Powers, the Whites were ultimately defeated in 1920.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the war, the Bolsheviks militarily intervened in Ukraine, which was under the control of anarcho-communists (led by [[Nestor Makhno]]) and Ukrainian ultranationalists. The anarchists made a treaty with the Bolsheviks in 1920, but the Bolsheviks refused to publicly acknowledge it, leading to the arrest of Nestor Makhno and his delegation upon confronting the Bolsheviks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===New Economic Policy===&lt;br /&gt;
The New Economic Policy was part of what historian Brinton called the thermidor after the French Revolution's Thermidorian Reaction. It involved a variety of concessions to the backward strata of Soviet society, including the restoration of obstacles to divorce, laws against homosexuality, and the abolition of the age of consent laws.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book|last=Brinton|first=C.|title=The Anatomy of Revolution|year=1965|pages=225–226}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Economically, it meant that industrial state owner enterprises gained autonomy in its policies while in rural areas individual private initiative and enterprise was allowed to dominate economic conduct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1928 the NEP ended when the Soviet government implemented the first Five Year Plan. This became known as central planning or a command economy, which lasted until circa 1991 when the economy had reached a critical point in the [[Crisis|crisis of the absolute over-accumulation of capital]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Socialism in one country===&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of an arguably overpowered bureaucracy and some of the reactionary concessions, the Soviets made extensive achievements which vastly improved life for hundreds of millions of people. These achievements were the result of the [[planned economy]] (built primarily during the 1930s). Even reactionaries&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last=Losurdo |first=Domenico |chapter=1 |chapterurl=https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WS8cCjXDgdJaXFrkW9b1ldY3xlwiPPQ89AwZo53Amlk |title=Stalin: The History and Critique of a Black Legend |url=https://docs.google.com/document/d/18K7U3g_ZsHwasqAS_BiokoWg5A0vXAsCkwYoO_xw93A |location=|publisher=|year= |page= |pageurl= |isbn= |oclc= |text=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; have been unable to deny this;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{cite book|last1=Downey |first1=Town |last2=Smith |first2=Nigel |chapter=6 |chapterurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=vYIqpmIgYZ4C&amp;amp;pg=PA37 |title=Russia and the USSR 1900–1995 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vYIqpmIgYZ4C |location=Great Clarendon Street |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1996 |page=43 |pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=vYIqpmIgYZ4C&amp;amp;pg=PA43 |isbn=0-19-917248-X |oclc= |text=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as antisocialist propagandist Nick Eberstadt admitted:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|[[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]]’s results were incontestable. This is a point those of us in the West often overlook. Stalin inherited a country that was the primary casualty of World War I, and bequeathed to his successors a super-power. It is but a single measure of the success of the ‘Leader’, and his understanding of the endurance of his nation, that between 1940 and 1953, a period marked by an immensely destructive world war costing perhaps twenty million Soviet lives and a series of purges claiming perhaps not many less, the USSR doubled its production of coal and steel, tripled its output of cement and industrial goods, and increased its pool of skilled labor by a factor of ten. These rates of growth were geometrically higher than in the less devastated and Terror-free West.|Nick Eberstadt|&amp;lt;ref name=Eberstadt&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Eberstadt|first=Nick|title=The Health Crisis in the USSR*|url=https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/35/6/1384/660149|journal=International Journal of Epidemiology|volume=35|issue=6|date=2006-12-04|pages=1384–1394|doi=10.1093/ije/dyl238}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The claim that the Soviets purged ‘perhaps not many less’ than twenty-million people, however, is obvious nonsense:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The Stalinist regime was consequently responsible for about a million purposeful killings, and through its criminal neglect and irresponsibility it was probably responsible for the premature deaths of about another two million more victims amongst the repressed population, i.e. in the camps, colonies, prisons, exile, in transit and in the POW camps for Germans. These are clearly much lower figures than those for whom Hitler’s regime was responsible.|Stephen Wheatcroft|&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Wheatcroft|first=Stephen|title=The Scale and Nature of German and Soviet Repression and Mass Killings, 1930-45|journal=Europe-Asia Studies|url=http://sovietinfo.tripod.com/WCR-German_Soviet.pdf|publisher=University of Glasgow|volume=48|number=8|year=1996|pages=1319–1353}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Stalin administration was thus responsible for about three million deaths, and even that is only if one includes Fascist POWs, victims of an unintentional but tragic famine (Wheatcroft’s own research proves that it was unintentional), and gulag prisoners. The purges of the late 1930s are a black mark on the USSR’s legacy; this much cannot be denied. That being said, they have been the subject of decades-worth of unjustified and intolerable distortions and exaggerations by bourgeois academics, necessitating a thorough reply. While Westerners are often treated to numbers ranging from 20 to 50 million, the true figures (while worrisome enough in their own right) are nowhere near that high. According to Professor J. Arch Getty:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|From 1921 to […] 1953, around 800,000 people were sentenced to death and shot, 85 percent of them in the years of the Great Terror of 1937–1938. From 1934 to Stalin’s death, more than a million perished in the gulag camps.|J. Arch Getty|&amp;lt;ref name=Future/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To these figures must be added an important qualification: contrary to popular opinion, the vast majority of gulag inmates were not innocent political prisoners. Professor Getty notes that those convicted of ‘counterrevolutionary crimes’ made up between 12 and 33 percent (depending on the year) of the gulag population, with the rest having been convicted of ordinary crimes. He also rejects the common claim that non-Russian nationalities were disproportionately targeted. To quote from his article in the ''American Historical Review'', concerning the gulag inmates in particular:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The long-awaited archival evidence on repression in the period of the Great Purges shows that the levels of arrests, political prisoners, executions, and general camp populations tend to confirm the orders of magnitude indicated by those labeled as &amp;quot;revisionists&amp;quot; and mocked by those proposing high estimates. […] Inferences that the terror fell particularly hard on non-Russian nationalities are not borne out by camp population data from the 1930s. The frequent assertion that most of the camp prisoners were &amp;quot;political&amp;quot; also appears not to be true.|J. Arch Getty|&amp;lt;ref name=Getty&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last1=Getty|first1=J. Arch|last2=Rittersporn|first2=Gábor|last3=Zemskov|first3=Viktor|title=Victims of the Soviet Penal System in the Pre-War Years|journal=The American Historical Review|url=http://sovietinfo.tripod.com/GTY-Penal_System.pdf|publisher=Oxford University Press|volume=98|number=4|year=1993|pages=1017–1049|doi=10.2307/2166597|jstor=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2166597}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to this research, alleged counterrevolutionaries never made up more than a third of the gulag population (and generally much less, around 12%). This is backed-up by a CIA report on the topic, which found that as many as 95% of camp prisoners were non-political in camps that they investigated.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|title=Forced Labor Camps in the USSR|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80T00246A032000400001-1.pdf|date=1957-02-11|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200120215158/https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP80T00246A032000400001-1.pdf|archivedate=2020-01-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The majority of camp prisoners were thus genuine criminals, convicted of rape, murder, theft, and similar. In addition, the gulag camps were not death camps like those of the [[Third Reich]]; they were prisons, albeit harsh ones. Even noted antisocialist scholars (such as those who worked on the infamous ''[[Black Book of Communism]]'') have admitted this. To quote again from Professor Getty:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Stalin’s camps were different from Hitler’s. Tens of thousands of prisoners were released every year upon completion of their sentences. We now know that before World War II more inmates escaped annually from the Soviet camps than died there. […] Werth, a well-regarded French specialist on the Soviet Union whose sections in the ''Black Book'' on the Soviet Communists are sober and damning, told ''Le Monde'', “Death camps did not exist in the Soviet Union.”|J. Arch Getty|&amp;lt;ref name=Future&amp;gt;{{safesubst:Cite web| last = Getty| first = J. Arch| title = The Future Did Not Work| work = The Atlantic| accessdate = 2019-10-09| date = 2000-03-01| url = https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2000/03/the-future-did-not-work/378081/}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It must also be noted that, contrary to the popular conception of the USSR as a place of ‘total terror’ (to quote Hannah Arendt), the majority of the population did not feel threatened by the purges. Referring to the time of the Great Purge, Professor&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|title=Dr. Robert Thurston|url=https://miamioh.edu/cas/academics/departments/history/about/faculty/emeriti-faculty/thurston/index.html|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200118140600/http://miamioh.edu/cas/academics/departments/history/about/faculty/emeriti-faculty/thurston/index.html|archivedate=2020-10-18}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Thurston notes that the Great Purge was an exceptional occurrence, which cannot be used to characterize the USSR pre-1953 as a whole:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|I will not simply imply but will state outright that the ''Ezhovshchina'' (Great Purge) was an aberration. Torture was uncommon until August 1937, when it became the norm; it ended abruptly with Beria’s rise to head of the [[NKVD]] in late 1938. Mass arrests followed the same pattern. […] A campaign for more regular, fair, and systemic judicial procedures that began in 1933–1934 was interrupted and overwhelmed by the Terror in 1937. It resumed in the spring of 1938, more strongly and effectively than before. Thus more than one trend was broken by the ''Ezhovshchina'', only to reappear after it.|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Life&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Thurston|first=Robert|title=Life and Terror in Stalin’s Russia, 1934–1941|publisher=Yale University Press|year=1996|jstor=https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt32bw0h}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He also points out that some arrests which took place during the Great Purge were based on previously ignored (yet arguably still legitimate) crimes against the Soviet state, such as fighting with the reactionary forces during the Civil War:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|People were suddenly arrested in 1937 for things that had happened many years earlier but had been ignored since, for example, serving in a White army.|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Life/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The question arises: why arrest former White Army soldiers, among others? The answer lies in the general fear of counterrevolution which pervaded the party at this time. According to Professor&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|title=Professor James Harris|url=https://ahc.leeds.ac.uk/history/staff/64/professor-james-harris|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200119044120/https://ahc.leeds.ac.uk/history/staff/64/professor-james-harris|archivedate=2020-01-19}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; James Harris:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|By the mid–1930s, the rise of the Nazis in Germany and the militarists in Japan, both stridently anti-communist, posed a very real threat to the USSR. War was then on the horizon, and [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] felt he had no choice but to take preemptive action against what he saw as a potential fifth column — a group that would undermine the larger collective.|James Harris|&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|last=Harris|first=James|title=Historian James Harris Says Russian Archives Show We’ve Misunderstood Stalin|publisher=History News Network|url=https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/163498|accessdate=2020-01-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bear in mind that since the moment of its founding (still a recent event, at this time), Soviet Eurasia had been invaded by multiple capitalist powers&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|last=Budanovic|first=Nikola|title=The Day That The USA Invaded Russia And Fought The Red Army|url=https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-i/the-day-that-the-usa-invaded-russia-and-fought-with-the-red-army-x.html|date=2016-11-17|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200119044116/https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-i/the-day-that-the-usa-invaded-russia-and-fought-with-the-red-army-x.html|archivedate=2020-01-19}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; (including the [[United States]]) in the early 1920s, and had also been subject to espionage and internal sabotage. Combined with the looming threat of war with an increasingly powerful Third Reich, it is hardly surprising that these factors came together to form an atmosphere of paranoia, which lent itself to the sort of violent excess seen during the Purge. This coincides with Professor Thurston’s interpretation of the events, from his book ''Life and Terror in Stalin’s Russia'':&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|[B]etween 1934 and 1936 police and court practice relaxed significantly. Then a series of events, together with the tense international situation and memories of real enemy activity during the savage Russian Civil War, combined to push leaders and people into a hysterical hunt for perceived ‘wreckers.’ After late 1938, however, the police and courts became dramatically milder.|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Life/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This general atmosphere of fear (not of the purges, but of external and internal enemies) is most likely why the majority of the Soviet people seemed to support the government’s actions during the Purge period:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The various reactions to arrest cataloged above suggest that general fear did not exist in the USSR at any time in the late 1930s. […] People who remained at liberty often felt that some event in the backgrounds of the detained individuals justified their arrests. The sense that anyone could be next, the underpinning of theoretical systems of terror, rarely appears.|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Thurston|first=Robert|title=Fear and Belief in the USSR’s “Great Terror”: Response to Arrest, 1935-1939|journal=Slavic Review|publisher=Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies|year=1986|volume=45|issue=2|pages=213–34|doi=10.2307/2499175}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===World War II===&lt;br /&gt;
''Main Article: [[World War II]]''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Gorbachev-era reforms===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1987, Gorbachev passed a law that decentralized much of the economy and expanded market activity, however was not by itself a restoration of capitalism. Nowhere within the law were capitalist relations of production legalized.&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The Basic Provisions stress that the economy shall continue to be planned and managed as &amp;quot;a unified national economic complex&amp;quot; as the principal means for carrying out the Party's economic policies. These policies are to be embodied in a 15-year plan that sets goals and priorities and outlines a program for implementing them. This plan, which is to contain specific targets for the 15- year period, is to be the basis for detailed formulation of the plan for the initial 5-year period, with a breakdown by years. Per the current procedure, this plan will be worked out by Gosplan and sent down to republic Councils of Ministers and to ministries. These bodies, in turn, send &amp;quot;initial planning data&amp;quot; to firms, on the basis of which the latter work out and ratify their own 5-year and annual plans. Plans are reviewed annually and revised if required. Proposals for revisions are submitted to Gosplan, which reviews them, revises the 5-year plan if necessary, and submits a report to the Council of Ministers and to the Central Committee, along with the draft state budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The firms receive: (1) &amp;quot;non-binding control figures&amp;quot; that specify the value of output, profit, foreign currency receipts, and major indicators of scientific and technical progress and social development; (2) a mandatory bill of state orders for output that &amp;quot;ensure meeting society's priority needs&amp;quot;; (3) limits, which include rationed goods and centralized investment allocations; (4) long-term economic normatives based on a list approved by the Council of Ministers regulating, among other things, growth of total wages, payments for capital and labor, and the allocation of profits among various kinds of taxes and reserve funds set up by ministries and enterprises. Three major funds are the bonus fund, the social development fund, and the fund for financing research and development and investment.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Clearly, the state intends to determine the rate and direction of the bulk of investment. To what extent will depend on how state centralized investment is defined. The state also intends to determine the directions of economic development and to enforce programs of scientific-technical progress that are worked out from the top.|Gertrude E. Schroeder|&amp;quot;Anatomy of Gorbachev's Economic Reform&amp;quot; in ''Milestones in Glasnost and Perestroyka: The Economy'', pp. 205-206}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 1987 reforms were still somewhat &amp;quot;moderate&amp;quot; compared to Yugoslavia's system, and clearly didn't go nearly as far as Deng's reforms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of the reasons used to justify Perestroika was because the USSR had problems with shortages beforehand. The continued existence of shortages are evidence the reforms didn't work and instead made the situation far worse than it had been before. Shortages clearly weren't an unknown phenomenon in socialist economies during the 20th century. It's something bourgeois economists usually focus on when criticizing socialism, hence the two-volume Economics of Shortage by János Kornai. Not coincidentally, Kornai's text had a lot of influence among Chinese reformers and he personally worked to convince them to enact market reforms at the 1985 Bashan conference, whereas Kornai's influence on Soviet reformers (at least those who advised Gorbachev) was a lot more limited. Furthermore, shortages are not proof of capitalist restoration. Marxists frequently argue that capitalism displays a very different problem: a crisis of overproduction caused by the purchasing power of workers declining amid an ever greater abundance of goods flooding the market. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Collapse and dissolution===&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote|Main article: [[Collapse of the USSR]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1980s, [[Imperial America]] expanded its arms chase, terrorizing the Soviets into catching up, a process made more stressful by the struggle in the Afghan war. Antisocialist officials also pressured banks and other businesses, and even the Swedish state, into ignoring the Soviet Union.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|last=Krehbiel|first=Paul|title=The Demise of the Soviet Union: The Secret War that Helped Destroy Soviet Socialism, 1981–1991|url=http://ouleft.org/wp-content/uploads/RR-PAUL-SECRETWAR.pdf|accessdate=2020-03-13}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Gorbachev introduced new reforms to both the economy and politics, which worsened the condition of the workers by increasing wealth inequality — though it never reached the same rate as it had in capitalist countries, e.g. the U.S. — as well as breadlines, and allowed more critical opinions to be voiced politically. But heads of newspapers were now in fact being replaced or pushed towards a more right-wing view by that same government, meaning such policies did not actually result in more discourse. Nonetheless it became a more and more accepted view to advocate for regulated or even free markets, which then led to the rising popularity of Yeltsin. He criticized the Soviet elite and advocated for market reforms, promising less waiting lines and a decrease in inequality. In April 1990 Yeltsin became the chairman of the Russian parliament. The direction the country was taking triggered a [[1991 Soviet coup d'état attempt|coup attempt in August 1991]], but which failed as Yeltsin called for a strike against it. While according to a referendum from 1991 most people did not want a complete dissolution of the Soviet republics, this is exactly what happened until the end of 1991: Parts of the government were simply dismantled, the party lost its power, and eventually republics started declaring independence — the union, in a sense, was falling apart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the Soviet Union’s discontinuation, living standards decreased dramatically and to this day many former citizens of it regret its fall, as many polls show, though the results sometimes strongly vary among some of the former republics.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|title=People who lived under communism more convinced ordinary people did not benefit from societal changes|url=https://www.pewresearch.org/global/?p=44546|date=2019-10-09}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Politics==&lt;br /&gt;
Modern evidence suggests that the masses did indeed support the Stalin administration, which likewise encouraged mass participation from the working people:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Stalin, the press, and the Stakhanovite movement all regularly encouraged ordinary people to criticize those in authority. […] If the citizenry was supposed to be terrorized and stop thinking, why encourage criticism and input from below on a large scale? […] my evidence suggests that widespread fear did not exist in the case at hand [the ‘Great Terror’ period].|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Thurston|first=Robert|title=On Desk-Bound Parochialism, Commonsense Perspectives, and Lousy Evidence: A Reply to Robert Conquest|journal=Slavic Review|publisher=Cambridge University Press|volume=45|number=2|year=1986|pages=238–244|doi=10.2307/2499177|jstor=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2499177}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These states were not entirely non-participatory as some have suggested; the working masses did have a genuine voice in political affairs.&amp;lt;ref name=vincesherman&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|author=vincesherman|title=The Trade Unions &amp;amp; Actually Existing Socialism: A Point of Comparison for the American Worker|url=https://return2source.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/the-trade-unions-actually-existing-socialism-a-point-of-comparison-for-the-american-worker/amp|date=2013-02-19|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20180920140818/https://return2source.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/the-trade-unions-actually-existing-socialism-a-point-of-comparison-for-the-american-worker/amp|archivedate=2018-09-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Professor Thurston states that ‘at the lower levels of society, in day-to-day affairs and the implementation of policy, [the Soviet system] was participatory.’ He notes that workers were frequently encouraged to take part in decision making:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The regime regularly urged its people to criticize local conditions and their leaders, at least below a certain exalted level. For example, in March 1937 Stalin emphasized the importance of the party’s ‘ties to the masses.’ To maintain them, it was necessary ‘to listen carefully to the voice of the masses, to the voice of rank and file members of the party, to the voice of so-called “little people,” to the voice of ordinary folk.’|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Reassessing&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book|last=Thurston|first=Robert|title=Reassessing the History of Soviet Workers: Opportunities to Criticize and Participate in Decision-Making, 1935–1941|journal=International Council for Central and East European Studies|url=https://www.docdroid.net/t9gG4jQ/thurston-robert-reassessing-the-history-of-soviet-workers-opportunities-to-criticize-and-participate-in-decision-making.pdf|pages=160–188}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While there were limits to criticism, Professor Thurston notes that ‘such bounds allowed a great deal that was deeply significant to workers, including some aspects of production norms, pay rates and classifications, safety on the job, housing, and treatment by managers.’ The workers had a voice in various official bodies, and they generally had their demands met:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The Commissariat of Justice also heard and responded to workers’ appeals. In August 1935 the Saratov city prosecutor reported that of 118 cases regarding pay recently handled by his office, 90, or 73.6 percent, had been resolved in favor of workers.|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Reassessing/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Workers also took part in direct oversight of managers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Workers participated by the hundreds of thousands in special inspectorates, commissions, and brigades which checked the work of managers and institutions. These agencies sometimes wielded significant power.|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Reassessing/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rights of Soviet workers were often noted in later accounts of the pre-1953 era:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|One émigré recalled that his stepmother, a factory worker, ‘often scolded the boss,’ and also complained about living conditions, but was never arrested. John Scott, an American employed for years in the late 1930s as a welder in Magnitogorsk, attended a meeting at a Moscow factory in 1940 where workers were able to ‘criticize the plant director, make suggestions as to how to increase production, increase quality, and lower costs.’|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Reassessing/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Thurston makes the following observation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Far from basing its rule on the negative means of coercion, the Soviet regime in the late 1930s fostered a limited but positive political role for the populace. […] Earlier concepts of the Soviet state require rethinking: the workers who ousted managers, achieved the imprisonment of their targets, and won reinstatement at factories did so through organizations which constituted part of the state apparatus and wielded state powers.|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Reassessing/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These facts are all the more impressive when we recall the dismal state of workers’ rights in the market economies at this time:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|This occurred at a time when American workers in particular were struggling for basic union recognition, which even when won did not provide much formal influence at the work place.|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Reassessing/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Thurston also states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Stalin did not intend to terrorize the country and did not need to rule by fear. Memoirs and interviews with Soviet people indicate that many more believed in Stalin’s quest to eliminate internal enemies than were frightened by it.|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Life/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps one of his most interesting statements (indeed, one of the most statements from any bourgeois historian dealing with the Stalin administration) and perhaps the most succinct summary of this issue is the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|There was never a long period of Stalinism without a serious foreign threat, major internal dislocation, or both, which makes identifying its true nature impossible.|Robert Thurston|&amp;lt;ref name=Life/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This relates to how the Soviet government reacted to the genuine material conditions faced by the Soviet Union, rather than simply following its own whims and desires. Working people did not only have the right to take part in decision-making at the workplace; they also had a voice in national policy decisions. Professor Kawamoto (Hitotsubashi University) states that the USSR had ‘a more democratic face than what is usually imagined, especially among Western people.’ As they put it:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The Soviet regime was democratic in its own sense of the word. [P]articipation through sending letters and attending discussions gave self-government a certain reality and helped to legitimize the Soviet regime. Therefore, listening to the people was an important obligation for the authorities. [T]he government encouraged people to send letters to the authorities and actively used the all-people’s discussions.|Kazuko Kawamoto|&amp;lt;ref name=Kawamoto&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Kawamoto|first=Kazuko|title=Rethinking Soviet Democracy|journal=Japanese Political Science Review|url=https://researchmap.jp/read0148263/?lang=english}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is also noted that Soviet citizens ‘believed that they were entitled to demand policy changes, and the draft writers, including specialists, officials, and deputies, felt obliged to respond to those demands.’ The process of gathering public opinion was intensive enough that it often slowed down the process of legislation:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Regarding the process of creating the Principles, direct participation worked largely as expected in the ideology of Soviet democracy, although it took many years.|Kazuko Kawamoto|&amp;lt;ref name=Kawamoto/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Professor Kawamoto says, ‘the reason why it took so long was deeply rooted in the ideas of Soviet democracy.’&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In addition to the aforementioned means of popular participation, Soviet officials also traveled throughout the nation to gather information on popular opinion. Using the development of Soviet family law as an example, Professor Kawamoto states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The draft makers were not only passive recipients of letters but also traveled throughout the Soviet Union to listen to the people. When the work in the Commissions of Legislative Proposals was reaching its end, members of the subcommittee and officials working for them visited several union republics from April to June 1962 to research the practice of family law and collect opinions on important standards in the draft of the Principles… After these research trips, the commission finished the draft and presented it to the Central Committee of the Party in July.|Kazuko Kawamoto|&amp;lt;ref name=Kawamoto/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While Soviet democracy was not without its flaws (as mentioned, the process was often rather slow, and there were limits on the extent of criticism), it would be highly inaccurate to describe the USSR as a ‘totalitarian’ society, with no democratic structures; on the contrary, the USSR did practice its own form of democracy, and it did so rather effectively.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Scope of authority===&lt;br /&gt;
The government's authority over cities was uncontested throughout its existence, bar areas which were under foreign occupation during the Great Patriotic War. There were however cases of villages being seized by the Basmachi movement in Central Asia, which was in essence defeated in 1931, with its remnants extinguished in Kirghizia by 1934. In the Baltics there were the &amp;quot;Forest Brothers&amp;quot;, who were anti-Soviet resistance forces that were pretty much defeated by Stalin's death. There were also some anti-collectivization rebellions.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://b-ok.cc/book/831235/8b358a Peasant Rebels under Stalin]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Economy of the Soviet Union==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Wage Labour===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In capitalist theories of the Soviet Union labour-power is considered a commodity in the Soviet Union, bought and sold on a labour-market.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Commodity Production===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In capitalist theories of the Soviet Union, commodity production is regarded to have had a generalised character, with inputs and outputs being commodities. Labour-power was sold to and bought by individual state enterprises, the means of production were sold between individual enterprises, and outputs, capital and consumer goods, were likewise sold to a market of consumers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Competition of Capitals===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In capitalist theories of the Soviet Union there is some debate about the existence of the competition of capitals. Tony Cliff and Raya Dunayevskaya claim that the law of value operated nonetheless due to international trade. [[Paresh Chattopadhyay]] disagrees, arguing that the law of value couldn't exist under such conditions and maintains that enterprises were reciprocally independent and were 'competitive' in the Marxist sense by confronting each other through the exchange of commodities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Accusations of imperialism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USSR has been accused of [[imperialism]] by Left Communists, Trotskyists, and Hoxhaists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Non-mode of production ===&lt;br /&gt;
Some Marxists provide an alternative theory of the nature of the political economy of the Soviet Union. The theory was first formulated by [[Hillel Ticktin]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Economy ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{hatnote|Main article: [[economics of the Soviet Union]]}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the exceptional periods of the 1910s and the 1990s, the Soviet Union was a [[planned economy]]. It achieved massively positive economic results until the 1970s, when revisionist policies and the [[Cold War]] began to cause a stagnation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Prerevolutionary background ===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1917, Russia was a backwards, semicapitalist and feudal society. They had only recently abolished the manor system, and replaced it with the most brutal and primitive form of capitalism. The nation was dreadfully underdeveloped, with no sign of improving in the future, and what little growth did occur led to massive inequalities. According to a Professor of Economic History at Oxford University:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Not only were the bases of Imperial advance narrow, but the process of growth gave rise to such inequitable changes in income distribution that revolution was hardly a surprise. Real wages for urban workers were static in the late Imperial period despite a significant increase in output per worker[.] The revolution was also a peasant revolt, and the interests of the peasants were different[.] As in the cities, there was no gain in real wages.|Robert C. Allen|&amp;lt;ref name=Allen&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Allen|first=Robert|title=A Reassessment of the Soviet Industrial Revolution|url=https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.507.8966&amp;amp;rep=rep1&amp;amp;type=pdf|journal=Comparative Economic Studies|publisher=Oxford University|volume=47|issue=2|year=2005|pages=315–332|doi=10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100101|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200119044114/https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.507.8966&amp;amp;rep=rep1&amp;amp;type=pdf|archivedate=2020-01-19}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The University of Warwick corroborates these observations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Agriculture had reached North American levels of productivity by 1913 and wheat prices collapsed after 1914. The expansion of the railroads had run its course and there was no prospect of protected light industry becoming internationally competitive. The appropriate comparators for the prospects for Russian capitalism in the twentieth century are not Japan but Argentina or even India. Moreover, Russian capitalist development had brought little if any benefit to the urban and rural working class, intensifying the class conflicts that erupted in Revolution.|Simon Clarke|&amp;lt;ref name=Farm&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|last=Clarke|first=Simon|title=Reviewed Work: Farm to Factory: A Reinterpretation of the Soviet Industrial Revolution|journal=Labour / Le Travail|url=https://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~syrbe/pubs/FarmtoFactory.pdf|publisher=Princeton University Press|volume=55|year=2005|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200118140746/https://homepages.warwick.ac.uk/~syrbe/pubs/FarmtoFactory.pdf|pages=300–302|jstor=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25149595|archivedate=2020-01-18}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Revolutionary period ===&lt;br /&gt;
With the 1917 revolution (and after the bloody civil war, with its policy of [[war communism]]), the Soviet economy began to grow rapidly.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Allen|first=Robert|title=The Standard of Living in the Soviet Union, 1928–1940|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-economic-history/article/standard-of-living-in-the-soviet-union-19281940/2922A641CA53F7BF592ECDDAF3316070|journal=The Journal of Economic History|publisher=Cambridge University Press|year=1998|date_published=2009-03-03|doi=10.1017/S0022050700021732}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The New Economic Policy (which nationalized large-scale industry and redistributed land, while allowing for the private sale of agricultural surplus) succeeded in transforming Russia from a semicapitalist existence into a developing state capitalist society, laying the groundwork for a [[planned economy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Following War Communism, the New Economic Policy (NEP) sought to develop the Russian economy within a quasi-capitalist framework.|Simon Clarke|&amp;lt;ref name=Farm/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economic circumstances came to require the transition to a planned economy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|However, the institutional and structural barriers to Russian economic development were now compounded by the unfavorable circumstances of the world economy, so that there was no prospect of export-led development, while low domestic incomes provided only a limited market for domestic industry. Without a state coordinated investment program, the Soviet economy would be caught in the low-income trap typical of the underdeveloped world.|Simon Clarke|&amp;lt;ref name=Farm/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1928 (after they selected the new head of the Communist Party), the [[RSFSR]] instituted a fully planned economy, and the first Five Year Plan was enacted. This resulted in rapid economic growth:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Soviet GDP increased rapidly with the start of the first Five Year Plan in 1928. […] The expansion of heavy industry and the use of output targets and soft-budgets to direct firms were appropriate to the conditions of the 1930s, they were adopted quickly, and they led to rapid growth of investment and consumption.|Robert C. Allen|&amp;lt;ref name=Allen/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bourgeois economists often alleged that this rapid growth came at the cost of per-capita consumption and living standards. However, more recent research has shown this to be false:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|There has been no debate that ‘collective consumption’ (principally education and health services) rose sharply, but the standard view was that private consumption declined. Recent research, however, calls that conclusion into question. […] While investment certainly increased rapidly, recent research shows that the standard of living also increased briskly. […] Calories are the most basic dimension of the standard of living, and their consumption was higher in the late 1930s than in the 1920s. […] There has been no debate that ‘collective consumption’ (principally education and health services) rose sharply, but the standard view was that private consumption declined. Recent research, however, calls that conclusion into question. […] Consumption per head rose about one quarter between 1928 and the late 1930s.|Robert C. Allen|&amp;lt;ref name=Allen/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Calorie consumption rose rapidly during this period:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Calories are the most basic dimension of the standard of living, and their consumption was higher in the late 1930s than in the 1920s. […] In 1895-1910, calorie availability was only 2100 per day, which is very low by modern standards. By the late 1920s, calorie availability advanced to 2500. […] By the late 1930s, the recovery of agriculture increased calorie availability to 2900 per day, a significant increase over the late 1920s. The food situation during the Second World War was severe, but by 1970 calorie consumption rose to 3400, which was on a par with western Europe.|Robert C. Allen|&amp;lt;ref name=Allen/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, the development of the Soviet economy during the interbellum period was extremely impressive:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The Soviet economy performed well. […] Planning led to high rates of capital accumulation, rapid GDP growth, and rising per capita consumption even in the 1930s. […] The expansion of heavy industry and the use of output targets and soft-budgets to direct firms were appropriate to the conditions of the 1930s, they were adopted quickly, and they led to rapid growth of investment and consumption.|Robert C. Allen|&amp;lt;ref name=Allen/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The USSR’s growth during the interbellum period exceeded that of the market economies:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The USSR led the non-OECD countries and, indeed, achieved a growth rate in this period that exceeded the OECD catch-up regression as well as the OECD average.|Robert C. Allen|&amp;lt;ref name=Allen/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This success is also attributed specifically to the revolution and the planned economy:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|This success would not have occurred without the 1917 revolution or the planned development of state owned industry.|Robert C. Allen|&amp;lt;ref name=Allen/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefits of the planned economy become obvious upon closer study:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|A capitalist economy would not have created the industrial jobs required to employ the surplus labour, since capitalists would only employ labour so long as the marginal product of labour exceeded the wage. State-sponsored industrialization faced no such constraints, since enterprises were encouraged to expand employment in line with the demands of the plan.|Simon Clarke|&amp;lt;ref name=Farm/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economic growth was also aided by the liberation of women, and the resulting control over the birth rate, as well as women's participation in the workforce:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The rapid growth in per capita income was contingent not just on the rapid expansion of GDP but also on the slow growth of the population. This was primarily due to a rapid fertility transition rather than a rise in mortality from collectivization, political repression, or the Second World War. Falling birth rates were primarily due to the education and employment of women outside the home. These policies, in turn, were the results of enlightenment ideology in its communist variant.|Robert C. Allen|&amp;lt;ref name=Allen/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reviews of Allen’s work have backed up his statements:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Allen shows that the Stalinist strategy worked, in strictly economic terms, until around 1970. […] Allen’s book convincingly establishes the superiority of a planned over a capitalist economy in conditions of labour surplus (which is the condition of most of the world most of the time).|Simon Clarke|&amp;lt;ref name=Farm/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other studies have backed-up the findings that the USSR’s living standards rose rapidly:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Remarkably large and rapid improvements in child height, adult stature and infant mortality were recorded from approximately 1945 to 1970. […] Both Western and Soviet estimates of GNP growth in the Soviet Union indicate that GNP per capita grew in every decade in the postwar era, at times far surpassing the growth rates of the developed western economies. […] The conventional measures of GNP growth and household consumption indicate a long, uninterrupted upward climb in the Soviet standard of living from 1928 to 1985; even Western estimates of these measures support this view, albeit at a slower rate of growth than the Soviet measures.|Williams College|&amp;lt;ref name=Brainerd&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|last=Brainerd|first=Elizabeth|title=Reassessing the Standard of Living in the Soviet Union: An Analysis Using Archival and Anthropometric Data|url=https://web.williams.edu/Economics/brainerd/papers/ussr_july08.pdf|publisher=Williams College|year=2008|doi=10.2139/ssrn.906590|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150318181223/http://web.williams.edu/Economics/brainerd/papers/ussr_july08.pdf|archivedate=2015-03-18|accessdate=2020-03-20}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As early as 1917, forest conservation became one of Bolshevism’s duties.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book|last=Lenin|first=Vladimir|chapter=8|title=The Tasks of the Proletariat in Our Revolution|url=https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/tasks/ch08.htm#v24zz99h-071-GUESS|year=1917}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With one minor exception, the Politburo consistently rejected the drive toward hyperindustrialism in the forest: Moscow capitulated only briefly to the industrialists in 1929, and in the 1930s and 1940s it set aside larger tracts of the RSFSR’s most valuable forests as preserves, off-limits to industrial exploitation.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Brain|first=Stephen|title=Stalin’s Environmentalism|url=https://drive.google.com/file/d/13QiQYmG65Vlr7ncIJI44ynMIWwOzWOWR|journal=The Russian Review|publisher=Wiley on behalf of The Editors and Board of Trustees of the Russian Review|year=2010|month=January|volume=69|number=1|pages=93–118}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Cold War ===&lt;br /&gt;
While the Soviet economy outperformed the market economies in numerous ways, the introduction of market reforms and other revisionist policies after 1953 may have contributed to the system’s deceleration and delayed the increase of living standards:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Three different measures of population health show a consistent and large improvement between approximately 1945 and 1969: child height, adult height and infant mortality all improved significantly during this period. These three biological measures of the standard of living also corroborate the evidence of some deterioration in living conditions beginning around 1970, when infant and adult mortality were rising and child and adult height stopped increasing and in some regions began to decline.|Williams College|&amp;lt;ref name=Brainerd/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economic growth also began to slow around this time:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|After the Second World War, the Soviet economy resumed rapid growth. By 1970, the growth rate was sagging, and per capita output was static by 1985.|Simon Clarke|&amp;lt;ref name=Farm/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Cold War]] was another factor which contributed to slowing growth rates:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|The Cold War was an additional factor that lowered Soviet growth after 1968. The creation of high tech weaponry required a disproportionate allocation of R &amp;amp; D personnel and resources to the military. Innovation in civilian machinery and products declined accordingly. Half of the decreased in the growth rate of per capita GDP was due to the decline in productivity growth, and that decrease provides an upper bound to the impact of the arms race with the United States.|Simon Clarke|&amp;lt;ref name=Farm/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the delayed growth rates, food consumption remained at acceptable levels. By 1976 the average caloric intake of the Soviet population was 3,330.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book| publisher = Springer| isbn = 978-1-349-10349-2| last = Birman| first = Igor| title = Personal Consumption in the USSR and the USA| date = 1989-06-18| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=_hexCwAAQBAJ|page=36|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=_hexCwAAQBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA36}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Similarly, a 1983 report confirmed that Soviets and U.S. citizens ate about the same amount of food quotidianly, but the Soviet diet may have be more eutrophic; they put the daily caloric intake at 3,280.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|title=STRENGTH‐DIET|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP84B00274R000300150009-5.pdf|date=1983-01-08|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200224040849/https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP84B00274R000300150009-5.pdf|archivedate=2020-02-24}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|title=The Nutrient Content of the Soviet Food Supply|url=https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000498133.pdf|year=1984|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200203193608/https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000498133.pdf|archivedate=2020-02-03}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Dr. Kenneth Gray, the White House’s top expert on Soviet agriculture, confirmed in his testimony to the Joint Economic Committee of Congress that ‘the food shortages in the USSR are occurring at fairly respectable levels of consumption.’&amp;lt;ref name=Medley&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|last=Medley|first=Joseph| accessdate = 2019-10-09| title = Soviet Agriculture: A Critique of the Myths Constructed by Western Critics|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110611145106/http://www.usm.maine.edu/eco/joe/works/Soviet.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the USSR did become a major importer of grain by the 1980s,&amp;lt;ref name=Medley/&amp;gt; they intended these imports strictly for feeding livestock, since it takes between seven and fourteen pounds of grain to produce one pound of meat. They thereby increased their consumption of meat and dairy.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book |last=Syzmański |first=Albert |authorlink= |chapter=5 |title=Human Rights in the Soviet Union |url=https://archive.org/stream/HumanRightsInTheSovietUnion |location=London |publisher=Zed Books Ltd. |year=1984 |section=Imports |page=132 |pageurl=https://archive.org/stream/HumanRightsInTheSovietUnion#page/n74/mode/1up |isbn=0 086232 018 6 |oclc=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Per capita meat consumption in the USSR doubled from the 1960s to the 1980s and exceeded such nations as the [[Kingdom of Norway]], Italy, Greece, the [[Kingdom of Spain]],&amp;lt;ref name=HRSU72&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book |last=Syzmański |first=Albert |authorlink= |chapter=5 |title=Human Rights in the Soviet Union |url=https://archive.org/stream/HumanRightsInTheSovietUnion |location=London |publisher=Zed Books Ltd. |year=1984 |section=Living Standards|pages=128–9 |pageurl=https://archive.org/stream/HumanRightsInTheSovietUnion#page/n72/mode/1up |isbn=0 086232 018 6 |oclc=}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[Japan]], and the [[State of Israel]]. Milk production increased almost sixty percent in two decades, to the point when during the 1980s the USSR became by far the world’s largest milk-producing country. According to the 1982 [[CIA]] report on the Soviet economy, ‘The Soviet Union remains basically self-sufficient with respect to food.’&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book| publisher = Transaction Publishers| isbn = 978-1-4128-3909-9| last1 = Hoffmann| first1 = Erik P.| last2 = Laird| first2 = Robbin Frederick| title = The Soviet Polity in the Modern Era| page = 431|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=63_obglArrMC&amp;amp;pg=PA431}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; These were the accomplishments of an agrarian labour force that decreased from 42% in 1960 to 20% in 1980, working in a country where over 90% of the land is either too arid or too frigid for farming.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite news| issn = 0882-7729| title = Soviet farming: more success than failure?| work = Christian Science Monitor| accessdate = 2019-10-09| date = 1982-12-13| url = https://www.csmonitor.com/1982/1213/121323.html}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although Vladimir Lenin would inspire many ecosocialists in the U.S.S.R.,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:Cite news| title = Lenin’s Eco-Warriors - The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/07/opinion/lenin-environment-siberia.html| accessdate = 2019-10-09| date = 2017-08-15|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20170815005108/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/07/opinion/lenin-environment-siberia.html|archivedate=2017-08-15}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and Moscow initiated history’s first state-directed effort to reverse artificially induced climate change,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Brain|first=Stephen|title=The Great Stalin Plan for the Transformation of Nature|journal=Environmental History|publisher=Forest History Society and American Society for Environmental History|year=2010|month=October|volume=15|number=4|page=671|JSTOR=https://www.jstor.org/stable/25764488}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; the immense pressure to compete with antisocialist régimes meant that pollution and irresponsible use of the environment would become very significant issues in later decades.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book|last=Szymański|first=Albert|chapter=5|title=Is the Red Flag Flying?|url=https://www.marxists.org/history/erol/ncm-6/red-flag.pdf|location=London|publisher=Zed Press|year=1979|page=83|pageurl=https://archive.org/stream/IsTheRedFlagFlying#page/n45/mode/1up|ISBN=0 905762 35 5}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:Cite web| title = Environmental Policy and Law in the USSR| accessdate = 2019-10-09| url = https://elr.info/sites/default/files/articles/17.10068.htm}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; For example, a series of dry years in the 1970s (particularly 1974–1975) and low flows between 1982 and 1986 contributed to the Aral Sea’s desiccation, but overconsumption of the water for irrigation was another factor. Starting in the 1960s, the Soviets proposed a large-scale project to redirect part of the flow of the Ob basin’s rivers to Central Asia over a gigantic canal system; replenishing the Aral Sea was considered as one of the project’s main goals.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:Cite book| publisher = Cambridge University Press| isbn = 978-1-139-42941-2| last = Glantz| first = Michael| title = Creeping Environmental Problems and Sustainable Development in the Aral Sea Basin| date = 1999-05-13|pageurl = https://books.google.com/books?id=2YXnBxZg7c4C&amp;amp;pg=PA174| page = 174}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It was only due to its staggering costs and the negative public opinion in the R.S.F.S.R. that the federal authorities unfortunately relinquished the project by 1986. (The worst effects of the sea’s desiccation manifested '''after''' the short twentieth century:&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/file:AralSea1989_2014.jpg&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; when a market economy was well in place.) The discontinuation of many Soviet industries also lead to a temporary reduction in CO₂ emissions in the Eastern world;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last1=Schierhorn|first1=Florian|last2=Kastner|first2=Thomas|last3=Kuemmerle|first3=Tobias|last4=Meyfroidt|first4=Patrick|last5=Kurganova|first5=Irina|last6=V Prishchepov|first6=Alexander|last7=Erb|first7=Karl-Heinz|last8=A Houghton|first8=Richard|last9=Müller|first9=Daniel|title=Large greenhouse gas savings due to changes in the post-Soviet food systems|journal=Environmental Research Letters|url=https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1cf1|publisher=IOP Publishing Ltd|date=2019-06-21|volume=14|number=6}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; United Nations data from 1990 indicate that the Soviet Union was emitting 13.5 tons of CO₂ per capita (lower than antisocialist states such as Australia (17.2), Canada (16.2), and Imperial America (19.1)).&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|title=Carbon dioxide emissions (CO2), metric tons of CO2 per capita (CDIAC)|url=http://mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Data.aspx|publisher=United Nations Statistics Division and United States Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC)|accessdate=2020-02-11}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summary:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Compared with the later period it is justifiable to talk of the indisputable advantages of the command over the market economy in Russian conditions. […] [T]hese advantages are evident even in comparison with the degenerate mid-1980s version of the command economy, which was very different from the classical model. […] The USSR economy also exceeded the main capitalist countries in this period in terms of a number of indicators of economic efficiency. […] [T]he fading of the rate of economic growth which began at the end of the 1950s was not an inevitable consequence of the faults of command economy as an economic system but was the result of its gradual dismantling and the incompetent actions of the political and economic leadership in this period.|G.I. Khanin|&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Khanin|first=G.I.|title=The 1950s: The Triumph of the Soviet Economy|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3594504|journal=Europe-Asia Studies|publisher=Taylor &amp;amp; Francis, Ltd.|volume=55|number=8|year=2003|pages=1187–1211|ISSN=0966-8136|DOI=10.1080/0966813032000141088}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Infrastructure ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Health ===&lt;br /&gt;
The USSR placed importance on the health of its people, and alongside quality food products, provided health care as a constitutional right. &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''ARTICLE 120. Citizens of the U.S.S.R. have the right to maintenance in old age and also in case of sickness or loss of capacity to work. This right is ensured by the extensive development of social insurance of workers and employees at state expense, free medical service for the working people and the provision of a wide network of health resorts for the use of the working people.'' - (Soviet Constitution of 1936 Chapter 10: FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF CITIZENS)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[https://www.departments.bucknell.edu/russian/const/36cons04.html#chap10]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''- Article 41: Citizens of the USSR have the right to rest and leisure. This right is ensured by the establishment of a working week not exceeding 41 hours, for workers and other employees, a shorter working day in a number of trades and industries, and shorter hours for night work; by the provision of paid annual holidays, weekly days of rest, extension of the network of cultural, educational, and health-building institutions, and the development on a mass scale of sport, physical culture, and camping and tourism; by the provision of neighborhood recreational facilities, and of other opportunities for rational use of free time. The length of collective farmers' working and leisure time is established by their collective farms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Article 42: Citizens of the USSR have the right to health protection. This right is ensured by free, qualified medical care provided by state health institutions; by extension of the network of therapeutic and health-building institutions; by the development and improvement of safety and hygiene in industry; by carrying out broad prophylactic measures; by measures to improve the environment; by special care for the health of the rising generation, including prohibition of child labour, excluding the work done by children as part of the school curriculum; and by developing research to prevent and reduce the incidence of disease and ensure citizens a long and active life.'' - (Soviet Constitution of 1977, Part II. The State And The Individual; Chapter 7: The Basic Rights, Freedoms, And Duties Of Citizens Of The USSR) &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;[https://www.departments.bucknell.edu/russian/const/77cons02.html#chap07 ''CONSTITUTION (FUNDAMENTAL LAW) OF THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS: Part II, Chapter 7'']&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Health conditions in Imperial Russia had been deplorable; it was among the unhealthiest nations in Europe, if not Earth in general:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Without doubt the Soviet Union was one of the most underdeveloped European countries at the time of the October Revolution. In terms of life-expectancy it lagged behind the other industrialized countries of Europe by a gap of about 15 years.|University of Munich|&amp;lt;ref name=Dinkel&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite journal|last=Dinkel|first=Reiner|title=Declining Life Expectancy in a Highly Developed Nation: Paradox or Statistical Artifact?|url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-95874-8_22|journal=Paradoxical Effects of Social Behavior|publisher=Physica-Verlag HD|year=1986|pages=311–321|doi=10.1007/978-3-642-95874-8_22|ISBN=978-3-7908-0350-1}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, after the October Revolution, healthcare conditions began to improve rapidly.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:Cite book&lt;br /&gt;
|author=Howard M. Leichter&lt;br /&gt;
|authorlink=&lt;br /&gt;
|chapter=7&lt;br /&gt;
|editor=|editors=&lt;br /&gt;
|title=A Comparative Approach to Policy Analysis: Health Care Policy in Four Nations&lt;br /&gt;
|url=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cfI6AAAAIAAJ&lt;br /&gt;
|archiveurl=https://wp.me/pa7b25-X&lt;br /&gt;
|archivedate=27/July/2018&lt;br /&gt;
|edition=&lt;br /&gt;
|location=New York&lt;br /&gt;
|publisher=Cambridge University Press&lt;br /&gt;
|year=1979&lt;br /&gt;
|volume=&lt;br /&gt;
|section=&lt;br /&gt;
|page=200&lt;br /&gt;
|pageurl=https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cfI6AAAAIAAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA200&lt;br /&gt;
|isbn=0-521-22648&lt;br /&gt;
|oclc=&lt;br /&gt;
|text=In this hospital great pains were taken to keep surgical areas antiseptic and patient areas clean. The patients could enjoy fresh air and relaxation in an outdoor garden. In general, the patients, who included persons of varied ethnic and social backgrounds, were getting good medical attention. […] As the two literary descriptions suggest, the quality of medical care has improved substantially under communist rule.}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; By the end of the interbellum period, healthcare standards (measured by life expectancy and mortality rates) were superior to those of Western Europe and the USA:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|One of the most striking advances of socialism has been and was generally seen to be the improvement in public health provision for the population as a whole. In accordance with this assumption mortality-rates in the Soviet Union declined rapidly in the first two decades after World War II. In 1965 life-expectancy for men and women in all parts of the Soviet Union, which still included vast underdeveloped regions with unfavorable living conditions, were as high or even higher than in the United States. Such a development fits perfectly into the picture of emerging industrial development and generally improving conditions of living.|University of Munich|&amp;lt;ref name=Dinkel/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even reactionary intellectuals were forced to acknowledge these achievements; according to Nick Eberstadt (an antisocialist think-tank adviser), healthcare standards in the Soviet Union during the interbellum period surpassed those of the USA and Western Europe:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Over much of this century the nation in the vanguard of the revolution in health was the Soviet Union. In 1897 Imperial Russia offered its people a life expectancy of perhaps thirty years. In European Russia, from what we can make out, infant mortality (that is, death in the first year) claimed about one child in four, and in Russia’s Asian hinterlands the toll was probably closer to one in three. Yet by the late 1950s the average Soviet citizen could expect to live 68.7 years: longer than his American counterpart, who had begun the century with a seventeen-year lead. By 1960 the Soviet infant mortality rate, higher than any in Europe as late as the Twenties, was lower than that of Italy, Austria, or East Germany, and seemed sure to undercut such nations as Belgium and West Germany any year.|Nick Eberstadt|&amp;lt;ref name=Eberstadt/&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He even notes that these achievements made planned economics seem nearly indefatigable:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|In the face of these and other equally impressive material accomplishments, Soviet claims about the superiority of their “socialist” system, its relevance to the poor countries, and the inevitability of its triumph over the capitalist order were not easily refuted.|Nick Eberstadt|&amp;lt;ref name=Eberstadt/&amp;gt;}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While health conditions did start to decline after the introduction of revisionist policies in the mid-1960s, this was likely caused mostly by the substance abuse, lopsided age demographics due to WWII, and the disparities in mortality rates between the European and Asian regions of the union rather than actual deficiencies in the healthcare system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|last=Cockshott|first=Paul|title=Economic Factors in Soviet Collapse|url=https://invidio.us/embed/EE-kCZnlGZU|accessdate=2020-03-26}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Either way, the planned economy’s healthcare achievements remain unimpeachable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In January of 1960, news of a smallpox epidemic reached Moscow, which immediately mobilized all the resources of its hospitals, clinics, police departments and the KGB to search for and contain probable carriers. For example, they interrupted university lectures to quarantine one hundred fifty students, and searched elsewhere for other contacts until they establish an entire chain, interrupting trains and flights to quarantine potentially infected people. They placed a total of 9,342 people under quarantine. The Soviets prevented the spread of smallpox by vaccinating all of Moscow’s and Moscow Region’s residents of all ages. Within only a week, they successfully vaccinated more then 9.5 million people, an unprecedented case in history. By mobilizing law enforcement, epidemiologists, and all medics, they successfully defeated the virus in only 19 days, concluding on February 3, 1960. In total, they found only forty-five Moscow residents suffering from smallpox, only three of whom died.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite web|last=Egorov|first=Boris|title=How the USSR defeated a smallpox epidemic in a matter of 19 days|url=https://www.rbth.com/history/331857|date=2020-03-19|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20200321031034/https://www.rbth.com/history/331857-how-ussr-defeated-black-smallpox|archivedate=2020-03-21}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Education===&lt;br /&gt;
Already in 1919, despite the lackluster economic conditions, the Bolsheviki improved education substantially:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|Thousands of new schools have been opened in all parts of Russia and the Soviet Government seems to have done more for the education of the Russian people in a year and a half than Czardom did in 50 years. […] The achievements of the department of education under Lunacharsky have been very great. Not only have all the Russian classics been reprinted in editions of three and five million copies and sold at a low price to the people, but thousands of new schools for men, women, and children have been opened in all parts of Russia. Furthermore, workingmen’s and soldiers’ clubs have been organized in many of the palaces of yesteryear, where the people are instructed by means of moving pictures and lectures. In the art galleries one meets classes of working men and women being instructed in the beauties of the pictures. The children’s schools have been entirely reorganized, and an attempt is being made to give every child a good dinner at school every day. Furthermore, very remarkable schools have been opened for defective and over-nervous children. On the theory that genius and insanity are closely allied, these children are taught from the first to compose music, paint pictures, sculpt and write poetry, and it is asserted that some valuable results have been achieved, not only in the way of productions but also in the way of restoring the nervous systems of the children.|William C. Bullitt|&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book|last=Kominsky|first=Morris|IV|title=The Hoaxers: Plain Liars, Fancy Liars, and Damned Liars|url=https://archive.org/stream/TheHoaxers|edition=|location=Boston|publisher=Branden Press, Inc.|year=1970|id=8283-1288-5|volume=I|page=256|pageurl=https://archive.org/stream/TheHoaxers#page/n250/mode/1up}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Corporal punishment, common in Imperial Russia, became illegal and increasingly rare.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book|last1=Gould|first1=Laurie|last2=Pate|first2=Matthew|chapter=1|editor=Graeme R. Newman|title=Corporal Punishment around the World|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Uf-1r3SVVrYC|location=Santa Barbara|publisher=Praeger|year=2012|page=26|pageurl=https://books.google.com/books?id=Uf-1r3SVVrYC&amp;amp;pg=PA26|ISBN=978-0-313-39131-6|LCCN=2012017133}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Education continued to improve from the 1920s to the 1960s, and various nonsocialist observers, including Western government officials, have attested to the high quality of Soviet education, noting the diverse range of subjects, support for students, and complexity compared to U.S. education.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book|last=Kominsky|first=Morris|IV|title=The Hoaxers: Plain Liars, Fancy Liars, and Damned Liars|url=https://archive.org/stream/TheHoaxers|edition=|location=Boston|publisher=Branden Press, Inc.|year=1970|id=8283-1288-5|volume=I|pages=294–303|pageurl=https://archive.org/stream/TheHoaxers#page/n288/mode/1up}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{quote|In common with primary and secondary education, all higher education is free, and students in higher education who maintain a ‘B’ average also receive a stipend. Such stipends vary according to the year of study, the subject studied, the type of school and the student’s progress; no stipend is paid for a year that must be repeated. In the mid-1970s university students received 40–60 roubles a month and technical school students 30–45 roubles. Admission to higher education is by examinations for specific institutions; there are no IQ tests or general aptitude tests in the USSR. Students who fail one institution’s entrance exam can reapply in future years or apply to other institutions. Advantages are given to higher education applicants with work experience, for example, quotas, extra points on examinations, special tutorial programmes. In 1967, 30% of admissions to higher education were of people who had been working full time. In general, Soviets are actively encouraged to continue with formal education throughout their lives. Indeed, the Soviets have one of the highest rates of attendance at institutions of higher education in the world.|Albert Szymański|&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;{{safesubst:cite book|last=Syzmański|first=Albert|chapter=5 |title=Human Rights in the Soviet Union |url=https://archive.org/stream/HumanRightsInTheSovietUnion|location=London |publisher=Zed Books Ltd.|year=1984|page=137|pageurl=https://archive.org/stream/HumanRightsInTheSovietUnion#page/n76/mode/1up |isbn=0 086232 018 6}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Environment==&lt;br /&gt;
===Environmentalism===&lt;br /&gt;
The USSR produced so little plastic that it was essential non-existent, and the plastic that was produced was made to last. Most bottles were made of glass, with old ones sent to factories to be sanitized and reused, with broken glass either swept up to be melted down or otherwise disposed of. Metal and paper waste was treated just like in wartime, similar to the US scrap collection system during World War II, resulting in minimal metal and paper waste. Littering was fined and weekly cleanup volunteers helped reduce trash in public places.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Widespread availability and use of public transport meant less CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; produced as well. Cars also tended to have 4-6 cylinders meaning they used less gas, with trucks using diesel fuel which requires less refinement and is thus cheaper, while also using less energy from power plants. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The focus on nuclear power further reduced CO&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; emissions, with nuclear power gradually coming to supersede coal-based power. Windmills were also used in areas for water pumps and flour production.&lt;br /&gt;
And furthermore Stalin, for one, had a series of ecological programs which replanted thousands of square kilometers of forests cut down or destroyed in preparation for and during World War II - [[The Great Plan for the Transformation of Nature]] (1948-1953). In all these ways, the Soviets sought to reduce the ecological effects of their rapid and massive industrialization necessary to survive their early years as a nation. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Russian Federation, on the other hand, shirked environmental maintenance work which was regularly done in the USSR. The current system is to cut down a section of forest, dig a deep pit, dump waste in the pit, light it on fire, and then bury it while the methane and other fuel continue to let the fire burn under ground; leaking into the air and nearby villages. This has caused and still causes large protests, especially since this is a significant step down from the more efficient trash sorting and processing system present in the Soviet Union.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Aral Sea===&lt;br /&gt;
Aral Sea has been slowly drying up for a while naturally. If no humans effect it this would take a few millenia to eliminate. Obviously human impact has sped up this process. In the 1960s, Soviet researchers predicted the complete evaporation of the body of water, and a river used to irrigate farmland had the excess water siphoned into the lake and would have been rerouted to continue to do so. This was, however, expensive, and during the privatizations (and subsequent economic catastrophe) of the 1980s, that came with the rise of Gorbachev, the plan was abandoned. After Kazakhstan seceded, high-intensity cotton farming practices and infrastructure mismanagement - most water running through irrigation to the farms evaporated on the way there - accelerated the shrinkage. Most of the former Aral Sea is a desert. The destruction of the Aral Sea is a product of resource mismanagement both during the Soviet Union and after, with the latter being exemplified by Yeltsin's capitalist shock therapy which largely disregarded environmental sustainability rather than simple ignorance of impact.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Radioactive dumping===&lt;br /&gt;
There is only one lake with high radiation levels as a result of radioactive dumping, Lake Karachay, but that was because radiation wasn't understood nearly as well at the time. Similarly, radioactive dumping by Soviets has occurred in the Barents and Kara Seas, however this was not a phenomenon unique to the USSR.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://web.archive.org/web/20200609083923/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_disposal_of_radioactive_waste Ocean disposal of radioactive waste]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Railways==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 1927 to 1941, the USSR expanded their freight rail network to be 20x larger than before, surpassing the US. From 1965 to 1980, the USSR build 639km of track a year (or about 1.5km a day). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:History]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:USSR]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=China&amp;diff=1710490</id>
		<title>China</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=China&amp;diff=1710490"/>
		<updated>2020-12-04T17:13:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;CCPSHILL: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Country&lt;br /&gt;
|name           ='''[[People's Republic of China]]'''&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;''Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó''&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;中华人民共和国&lt;br /&gt;
|map	        =China rel01.jpg&lt;br /&gt;
|map2           =China location.png&lt;br /&gt;
|flag	        =Flag_of_the_PRC.png‎&lt;br /&gt;
|arms	        =Arms of PR China.png&lt;br /&gt;
|capital	=Beijing&lt;br /&gt;
|capital-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|government	= Socialist republic&lt;br /&gt;
|government-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|language	=Chinese (Mandarin)&lt;br /&gt;
|king	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|queen	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|monarch-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|president	=Xi Jinping&lt;br /&gt;
|premier	=Li Keqiang&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor	=&lt;br /&gt;
|chancellor-raw	=&lt;br /&gt;
|pm	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|pm-raw	        =&lt;br /&gt;
|area	        =3,704,427 sq mi&lt;br /&gt;
|pop	        =1,440,000,000 (2020)&lt;br /&gt;
|pop-basis	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp	        =$15,000,000,000,000 (2020)&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-year	=&lt;br /&gt;
|gdp-pc	        =$10,417 (2020)&lt;br /&gt;
|currency	=Yuan&lt;br /&gt;
|idd		=&lt;br /&gt;
|tld            =&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''China''' is the world's largest country by population, currently a proletarian [[socialist]] one-party republic.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gallagher, Mike (November 7, 2019). [https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/469429-seeking-truth-from-facts-on-china Seeking truth from facts on China]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved November 7, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; With thousands of years of continuous traditions, in three decades it has dramatically changed itself from a poor backward nation to a world power and is one of the world's top economies, only second next to the [[United States]]. It has emerged as a major regional power in East Asia, averaging over 9% economic growth per year since 1978 when it introduced a market-based economic system with some elements of capitalism, to replace its old socialism. Foreign businesses have flocked to invest in China, Americans and others rush to buy its cheap factory output, Chinese exports flooded the world. It has vast reserves of dollar holdings.  China is modernizing its military, has joined numerous regional and international institutions, and plays an increasingly visible role in international politics. However, the paper statistics of China's growth hide the fact that it may have a weaker economy than it admits, as seen in the many &amp;quot;ghost towns&amp;quot;, among other factors.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Fong, Dominique (June 15, 2018). [https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-ghost-towns-haunt-its-economy-1529076819 China’s Ghost Towns Haunt Its Economy]. ''The Wall Street Journal''. Retrieved June 15, 2018.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; China is trying to overtake the US economy, and gained mainstream media praise for it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nation is under the control of the [[Communist Party of China]], which encompasses mainland China, albeit with many border disputes. The PRC claims [[Taiwan]] as a province, but Taiwan is currently controlled by the Republic of China and Taipei remains under a U.S puppet regime. [[Hong Kong]] was guaranteed its democratic sovereignty in a peace arrangement between the [[United Kingdom]] in 1997, and [[Macau]] was handed over by [[Portugal]] in 1999. Both territories are now [[Special Administrative Region]]s and have autonomy over local affairs. However, the autonomy has been eroded in recent years, particularly after the 2014 &amp;quot;Umbrella Revolution&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since China's accession to the [[World Trade Organization]] (WTO) in 2001, China represents a vast market that is growing more affluent and sophisticated while remaining a low-cost base for export-oriented production. Educationally, China is forging ahead as partnerships, and exchanges with foreign universities have helped create new research opportunities for its students. China used the Summer Olympics in 2008 as a platform of propagating the so-called &amp;quot;economic development&amp;quot; to the world, while it is still a Socialist country in its core of the past two decades since the 1989 Tiananmen Incident. The new leadership is committed to generating greater economic development in the interior and providing more services to those who do not live in China's coastal areas. However, China is not a true market economy, as the key resources, such as land, is not privately owned; the so-called collective ownership is still de facto government ownership. Moreover, on the Socialist Government's Constitution, Mainland China is still officially a Socialist Country. In 2015, the People's Republic of China has been &amp;quot;denied as a market economy.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For more information on China, see [[World History Lecture Three]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Name==&lt;br /&gt;
{{language box&lt;br /&gt;
|s=中国&lt;br /&gt;
|t=中國&lt;br /&gt;
|l=central nation&lt;br /&gt;
|p=Zhōngguó&lt;br /&gt;
|w=Chung&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;-kuo&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
The word &amp;quot;China&amp;quot; is derived from the [[Persian language|Persian]] word ''Cin'' (چین), which is from the [[Sanskrit]] word ''Cīna'' (चीन).&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;AmHer&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/China?qsrc=2888 China]&amp;quot;. ''The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language'' (2000). Boston and New York: Houghton-Mifflin.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; It is first recorded in 1516 in the journal of the Portuguese explorer [[Duarte Barbosa]].&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&amp;quot;China&amp;quot;. ''Oxford English Dictionary'' (1989). ISBN 0-19-957315-8.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;''[https://books.google.com.vn/books?id=edzW9fuOF-cC&amp;amp;pg=PA211&amp;amp;dq=#v=onepage&amp;amp;q=%22Very%20Great%20Kingdom%20of%20China%22&amp;amp;f=false The Book of Duarte Barbosa]'' (chapter title &amp;quot;The Very Great Kingdom of China&amp;quot;). ISBN 81-206-0451-2. In the [http://purl.pt/435/ Portuguese original], the chapter is titled &amp;quot;O Grande Reino da China&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The journal was translated and published in England in 1555.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Eden, Richard (1555). ''Decades of the New World'': &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;{{cite book | title=Western Views of China and the Far East, Volume 1 | publisher=Asian Research Service | year=1984 | page=34 |first=Henry Allen |last=Myers}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The traditional theory, proposed in the 17th century by Martino Martini, is that ''Cīna'' is derived from &amp;quot;Qin&amp;quot; (秦), the westernmost of the Chinese kingdoms during the [[Zhou Dynasty]].&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Martini&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Martino, Martin, ''Novus Atlas Sinensis'', Vienna 1655, Preface, p. 2.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; However, the word was used earlier in [[Hindu]] scripture, including the ''Mahābhārata'' (5th century BC) and the ''Laws of Manu'' (2nd century BC). Indian writers were not aware of China until the second century AD. Earlier usage of the word presumably refers to another entity, perhaps a country near the Tibetan-Burma border.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See Liu, Lydia He, ''The Clash of Empires'', p. 77&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Wade, Geoff. &amp;quot;[http://www.sino-platonic.org/complete/spp188_yelang_china.pdf The Polity of Yelang and the Origin of the Name 'China']&amp;quot;. ''[[Sino-Platonic Papers]]'', No. 188, May 2009, p. 20.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==People==&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Chinese people.jpg|right|250px]]&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethnic Groups===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China officially recognizes 56 distinct ethnic groups. The largest ethnic group is the Han Chinese, who constitute about 91.9% of the total population. The remaining 8.1% are Zhuang (16 million), Manchu (10 million), Hui (9 million), Miao (8 million), [[Uighur]] (7 million), Yi (7 million), Mongolian (5 million), Tibetan (5 million), Buyi (3 million), Korean (2 million), and other ethnic minorities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2009 large-scale rioting erupted as the [[Uighur]] minority fought Chinese riot police in major cities in China's western Xinjiang province. Hundreds are dead.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/07/world/asia/07kadeer.html?ref=world Wrik Eckholm, &amp;quot;China Points to Another Leader in Exile,&amp;quot; ''New York Times'' July 6, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Uighurs are angry at political, cultural and religious persecution as well as the growing presence in the region of Han Chinese - China's main ethnic group. Han now predominate in the cities, and Uighurs in the countryside. This is the first major violent unrest in China in two decades.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Language===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:China Ethnic language.jpg|thumb|right|Chinese Ethnolinguistic Groups.]]&lt;br /&gt;
There are seven major Chinese dialects and many subdialects. [[Mandarin Chinese|Mandarin]] (or Putonghua), the predominant dialect, is spoken by over 70% of the population. It is taught in all schools and is the medium of government. About two-thirds of the Han ethnic group are native speakers of Mandarin; the rest, concentrated in south and southeast China, speak one of the six other major Chinese dialects. Non-Chinese languages spoken widely by ethnic minorities include Mongolian, Tibetan, Uyghur and other Turkic languages (in Xinjiang), and Korean (in the northeast). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All Chinese dialects use the same written character sets. In mainland China, the [[Simplified Chinese|Simplified]] characters have been in use since 1949.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====The Pinyin System of Romanization====&lt;br /&gt;
On January 1, 1979, the Chinese Government officially adopted the [[Hanyu pinyin|pinyin]] system for spelling Chinese names and places in Roman letters. A system of Romanization invented by the Chinese, pinyin has long been widely used in China on street and commercial signs as well as in elementary Chinese textbooks as an aid in learning Chinese characters and for common character input systems. Variations of pinyin also are used as the written forms of several minority languages. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pinyin has now replaced other conventional spellings in China's English-language publications. The U.S. Government also has adopted the pinyin system for all names and places in China. For example, the capital of China is now spelled &amp;quot;Beijing&amp;quot; rather than &amp;quot;Peking.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 the Republic of China government finally adopted the pinyin system, replaces the [[Wade-Giles]] system which is gradually pushed away by the Chinese diaspora.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== China and racism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: [[East Asia, China, atheism and racism#China and racism|China and racism]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Religion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A February 2007 survey concluded that 31% of Chinese citizens ages 16 and over, representing 300 million persons, follow some kind of religion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;This is approximately three times the official figure reported by the Government in April 2005. See [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2008/108404.htm U.S. State Department &amp;quot;International Religious Freedom Report 2008&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are reportedly more than 100,000 officially recognized sites for religious activities, 300,000 officially recognized clergy, and more than 3,000 officially recognized religious organizations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Government officially recognizes five main religions: [[Buddhism]], [[Taoism]], [[Islam]], [[Catholicism]], and [[Protestantism]]. There are five state-sanctioned &amp;quot;Patriotic Religious Associations&amp;quot; (PRAs) that manage the activities of the recognized faiths. The Russian Orthodox Church operates in some regions, particularly those with large populations of Russian expatriates or with close links to Russia. Foreign residents in the country who belonged to religious faiths not officially recognized by the Government were generally permitted to practice their religions. There is very little freedom for Christians however.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-25502760&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is difficult to estimate the number of Buddhists and Taoists because they do not have congregational memberships and many practice exclusively at home.  The following are informed estimates published by Freedom.org or religious communities (with the exception of Taoism, for which no figures were available), drawing on official figures, public opinion surveys, academic studies, media reports, and religious groups’ own reporting as of 2019.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/FH_ChinasSprit2016_FULL_FINAL_140pages.pdf&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Chinese Buddhists 185-250M&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:China B.jpg|right|280px]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Protestants 60-80M&lt;br /&gt;
:*Registered ~30-50M&lt;br /&gt;
:*Unregistered ~30M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Muslims 21-23M&lt;br /&gt;
:*Hui 12M&lt;br /&gt;
:*Uighur 11M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Catholics 12M&lt;br /&gt;
:*Registered 6M&lt;br /&gt;
:*Unregistered 6M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Falun Gong practitioners 7-20M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Tibetan Buddhists 6-8M&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Government estimated that there are 16,000 Buddhist temples and monasteries, 200,000 Buddhist monks and nuns, more than 1,700 reincarnate lamas, and 32 Buddhist schools. Most believers, particularly ethnic Han Buddhists, practice Mahayana Buddhism, while the majority of Tibetans and ethnic Mongolians, as well as a growing number of ethnic Chinese, practice Tibetan Buddhism, a Mahayana adaptation. Some ethnic minorities in southwest Yunnan Province practice Theravada Buddhism, the dominant tradition in parts of neighboring Southeast Asia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are more than 25,000 Taoist priests and nuns, more than 1,500 Taoist temples, and 2 Taoist schools. Traditional folk religions (worship of local gods, heroes, and ancestors) are practiced by hundreds of millions of citizens and are often affiliated with Taoism, Buddhism, or ethnic minority cultural practices.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The government says there are twenty million Muslims. Independent estimates range as high as fifty million or more. There are more than 40,000 Islamic places of worship (more than half of which are in the XUAR), more than 45,000 imams nationwide, and 10 Islamic schools. The country has ten predominantly Muslim ethnic groups, the largest of which is the Hui, estimated to number more than ten million. The Hui are centered in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, but there are significant concentrations of Hui throughout the country, including in Gansu, Henan, Qinghai, Yunnan, and Hebei Provinces, as well as in the TAR and the XUAR. Hui Muslims slightly outnumber Uighur Muslims, who live primarily in the XUAR. According to an official 2005 report, the XUAR had 23,900 mosques and 27,000 clerics at the end of 2004, but fewer than half of the mosques were authorized to hold Friday prayer and holiday services. The country also has more than one million Kazakh Muslims and thousands of Dongxiang, Kyrgyz, Salar, Tajik, Uzbek, Baoan, and Tatar Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Officials from the Three-Self Patriotic Movement/China Christian Council (TSPM/CCC), the government branch (committee) in charge of the Christianity Churches (officially led by the CPC), estimated that at least twenty million citizens worship in official churches. Government officials stated that there are more than 50,000 registered TSPM churches and 18 TSPM theological schools. The Pew Research Center estimates that between 50 million and 70 million Christians practice without state sanction. However, some estimates over 100million people are Christians. The World Christian Database estimates that there are more than 300 unofficial house church networks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Catholic Patriotic Association (CPA) reports that 5.3 million persons worship in its churches and it is estimated that there are an additional 12 million or more persons who worship in unregistered Catholic churches that do not affiliate with the CPA. According to official sources, the government-sanctioned CPA has more than 70 bishops, nearly 3,000 priests and nuns, 6,000 churches and meeting places, and 12 seminaries. There are thought to be approximately 40 bishops operating &amp;quot;underground,&amp;quot; some of whom are in prison or under house arrest. During the reporting period, at least three bishops were ordained with papal approval. In September 2007 the official media reported that Liu Bainian, CPA vice president, stated that the young bishops were to be selected to serve dioceses without bishops and to replace older bishops. Of the 97 dioceses in the country, 40 reportedly did not have an acting bishop in 2007, and more than 30 bishops were over 80 years of age.&lt;br /&gt;
===State atheism and religious discrimination===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[China and atheism]] and [[Communism and religious persecution]] and [[Persecution of Christians in the People's Republic of China]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China has the world's largest [[atheism|atheist]] population.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thechapmans.nl/news/Atheist.pdf Top 50 Countries With Highest Proportion of Atheists / Agnostics (Zuckerman, 2005)]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/05/23/a-surprising-map-of-where-the-worlds-atheists-live/ A surprising map of where the world’s atheists live], ''Washington Post'' By Max Fisher and Caitlin Dewey May 23, 2013&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; China has [[state atheism]] (see: [[China and atheism]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Government restricts legal religious practice to government-sanctioned organizations and registered religious groups and places of worship, and seeks to control the growth and scope of the activity of both registered and unregistered religious groups, including &amp;quot;house churches.&amp;quot; Government authorities limit proselytism, particularly by foreigners and unregistered religious groups, but permit proselytism in state-approved religious venues and private settings. The Chinese government explicitly prohibits students and civil servants from participating in certain religious practices, even when not in school or at work.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://news.yahoo.com/china-bans-ramadan-fast-muslim-northwest-103756197.html Didi Tang &amp;quot;China bans Ramadan fast in Muslim northwest.&amp;quot; July 3, 2014. Associated Press.]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Great Mosque Xi an China.jpg|thumb|330px|Great Mosque of Xi'an.]]&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, the Government's repression of religious freedom intensified in some areas, including in Tibetan areas and in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region (XUAR). Unregistered Protestant religious groups in Beijing reported intensified harassment from government authorities in the lead up to the 2008 Summer Olympic Games. Media and China-based sources reported that municipal authorities in Beijing closed some house churches or asked them to stop meeting during the 2008 Summer Olympic Games and Paralympic Games. During the reporting period, officials detained and interrogated several foreigners about their religious activities and in several cases alleged that the foreigners had engaged in &amp;quot;illegal religious activities&amp;quot; (alleged) and canceled their visas. Media reported that the total number of expatriates expelled by the Government due to concerns about their religious activities exceeded one hundred. Officials in the XUAR, the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR), and other Tibetan areas tightly controlled religious activity. The Government sought the forcible return of several Uighur Muslims living abroad, some of whom had reportedly protested restrictions on the Hajj and encouraged other Muslims to pray and fast during Ramadan. Followers of Tibetan Buddhism, including those in the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region and most Tibetan autonomous areas, faced more restrictions on their religious practice and ability to organize than Buddhists in other parts of the country. &amp;quot;Patriotic education&amp;quot; campaigns in the TAR and other Tibetan regions, which required monks and nuns to sign statements personally denouncing the Dalai Lama, and other new restrictions on religious freedom were major factors that led monks and nuns to mount peaceful protests at a number of monasteries on March 10, 2008. The protests and subsequent security response gave way to violence in Lhasa by March 14 and 15. &lt;br /&gt;
Moreover, Christians, including the Catholic, Protestant Christians, are facing societal hostility generated by the government, and the Christians are facing difficulties when comes to the decision of ascension in the governmental (regime) enterprises and will be arrested if evangelizing on governmental schools' campus (public schools, but with heavy involvement from the Communist party branches).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Underground&amp;quot; Roman Catholic clergy faced repression, in large part due to their avowed loyalty to the Vatican, which the Government accused of interfering in the country's internal affairs. The Government continued to repress groups that are designated as &amp;quot;cults,&amp;quot; most of which included several Christian groups and Falun Gong.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Religious and ethnic minority groups such as Tibetan Buddhists and Uighur Muslims experienced societal discrimination not only because of their religious beliefs but also because of their status as ethnic minorities with distinct languages and cultures. After the March 2008 protests in Lhasa and other Tibetan areas, there were reports of increased tensions between Tibetan Buddhists and Hui Muslims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[Falun Gong]] is a cult that blends aspects of Taoism, Buddhism, and the meditation techniques and physical exercises of qigong (a traditional Chinese exercise discipline), with the teachings of Falun Gong leader Li Hongzhi, who claims that race-mixing is evil and that modern technology is part of an extraterrestrial conspiracy to enslave humanity. There are estimated to have been at least 2.1 million adherents of Falun Gong before the Government banned the group in 1999. Hundreds of thousands may practice Falun Gong privately, but with serious risks, and once discovered by the government agents, the practitioners will be jailed, losing jobs, and may not even attend the universities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Population Policy==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:China Mex RGarciaOrtiz.jpg|right|Chinese at Mexico]]&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|One-child Policy}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With a population officially just over 1.3 billion and an estimated growth rate of about 0.6%, China is very concerned about its population growth and has attempted with mixed results to implement a strict birth limitation policy. Until 2013 the government permitted one child per family, with allowance for a second child under certain circumstances (such as twins), especially in rural areas, and with guidelines looser for ethnic minorities with small populations. Enforcement varies and relies largely on &amp;quot;social compensation fees&amp;quot; to discourage extra births. Official government policy opposed forced [[abortion]] or sterilization, but in some localities, there were instances of forced [[abortion]]. The government's goal was to stabilize the population in the first half of the 21st century, and current projections are that the population would peak at around 1.6 billion by 2050. Boys are highly prized, and because screening of fetuses is done to determine gender, selective abortion has resulted in 119 boys born for every 100 girls. By 2020, 24 million men of marrying age will find themselves without wives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2013 the government eased the One-child Policy strongly. Since then families in which at least one parent was an only child can have a second child now.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://cnsnews.com/news/article/china-ease-1-child-policy-abolish-labor-camps&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Government==&lt;br /&gt;
The People's Republic of China is a dictatorship of the proletariat in which the [[Communist Party of China]] (CPC) constitutionally is the base structure and source of power. Moreover, the society has ran according to the motive of the Communist Party in the past decades.. Party members hold almost all top government, police, and military positions. The children of high-level officials, dubbed “[[princelings]]” (''taizi'') in colloquial Chinese, are particularly prominent at the highest levels of the Chinese political system, China's most prominent princeling is '''[[Xi Jinping]]'''.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41007.pdf Understanding China’s Political System], ''Congressional Research Service'', March 20, 2013.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Ultimate authority rests with the 25-member political bureau (Politburo) of the CCP and its nine-member standing committee. Xi Jinping holds the three most powerful positions as CCP general secretary, president, and chairman of the Central Military Commission. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Communist Party of China===&lt;br /&gt;
The 91 million-member CPC continues to dominate government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In periods of greater openness, the influence of people and organizations outside the formal party structure has tended to increase, particularly in the economic realm. This phenomenon is most apparent today in the rapidly developing coastal region. Nevertheless, in all important government, economic, and cultural institutions in China, party committees work to see that party and state policy guidance is followed and that non-party members do not create autonomous organizations that could challenge party rule. Party control is tight- although not being felt directly. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Theoretically, the party's highest body is the Party Congress, which traditionally meets at least once every 5 years. The 17th Party Congress is expected to take place in the fall of 2007. The primary organs of power in the Communist Party include: &lt;br /&gt;
*The Politburo Standing Committee, which currently consists of nine members (one seat is vacant following the June 2, 2007 death of Huang Ju); &lt;br /&gt;
*The Politburo, consisting of 24 full members, including the members of the Politburo Standing Committee; &lt;br /&gt;
*The Secretariat, the principal administrative mechanism of the CCP, headed by the General Secretary; &lt;br /&gt;
*The Central Military Commission; &lt;br /&gt;
*The [[Discipline Inspection Commission]], which is charged with rooting out corruption and malfeasance among party cadres. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Great Hall of the People in Tiananmen Square in Beijing China.jpg|thumb|right|340px|In front of the Great Hall of the People in Tiananmen Square in Beijing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===State Structure===&lt;br /&gt;
The Chinese Government is constructed around the Communist Party of China; its role is to implement party policies. The primary organs of state power are the National People's Congress (NPC), the President (the head of state), and the State Council. Members of the State Council include Premier Li Keqiang (the head of government), a variable number of vice premiers (now four), five state councilors (protocol equivalents of vice premiers but with narrower portfolios), and 22 ministers and four State Council commission directors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the state constitution, the NPC is the highest organ of political power in Mainland China. It meets annually for about 2 weeks every March to review and approve major new policy directions, laws, the budget, and major personnel changes. These initiatives are presented to the NPC for consideration by the State Council after previous endorsement by the Communist Party's Central Committee. Although the NPC generally approves State Council policy and personnel recommendations, various NPC committees hold active debate in closed sessions, and changes may be made to accommodate alternate views. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the NPC is not in session, its permanent organ, the Standing Committee, exercises state power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Principal Government and Party Officials===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(After Oct. 2017)&lt;br /&gt;
*President—Xi Jinping&lt;br /&gt;
*Vice President—&lt;br /&gt;
*Premier, State Council—Li Keqiang&lt;br /&gt;
*NPC Chair—Wu Bangguo&lt;br /&gt;
*Vice Premier—Zhang Gaoli&lt;br /&gt;
*Politburo Standing Committee—Xi Jinping (General Secretary), Li Keqiang, Wang Yang, Li Zhanshu, Wang Huning, Zhao Leji, Han Zheng &lt;br /&gt;
*Other Politburo Members— Ding Xuexiang, Wang Chen, Liu He, Xu Qiliang, Sun Chunlan (Arrested), Li Xi, Li Qiang, Li Hongzhong, [[Yang Jiechi]], Zhang Youxia, Chen xi, Chen Quanguo, Zhao Leji, Guo Shengkun, Huang Kunming, Cai Qi. (alternate)&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Xi and Mao.jpg|right|250px|thumb|Xi an Mao]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Alternate Politburo Members—Wang Gang&lt;br /&gt;
*Chairman, Central Military Commission—Xi Jinping&lt;br /&gt;
*Foreign Minister—Yang Jiechi&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Commerce—Zhong Shan&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Finance—Jin Renqing&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Agriculture— &lt;br /&gt;
*Minister of Industry and Digitalization —Wang Xudong&lt;br /&gt;
*Governor, People's Bank of China—Zhou Xiaochuan&lt;br /&gt;
*Minister, State Development and Reform Commission—Ma Kai&lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to the U.S.--Zhou Wenzhong &lt;br /&gt;
*Ambassador to UN—Wang Guangya&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Relations===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since its establishment, the Communist Party is doing all it can to lure countries to stand and advocate for its position that it is the sole legitimate government of all China, including Hong Kong, Macau, and [[Taiwan]]. In the early 1970s, Beijing was recognized diplomatically by most world powers. [[Beijing]] (Pekin) assumed the China seat in the [[United Nations]] in 1971 and has since become increasingly active in multilateral organizations. Japan established diplomatic relations with China in 1972, and the United States did so in 1979. As of July 2007, the number of countries that have diplomatic relations with Beijing had risen to 167, while 24 maintained diplomatic relations with Taiwan. &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Chinese painting.jpg|thumb|left|Chinese painting.]]&lt;br /&gt;
After the founding of the P.R.C., China's foreign policy initially focused on solidarity with the Soviet Union and other communist countries. In 1950, the Mainland Communist Regime sent the People's Liberation Army into North Korea to help North Korea halt the UN offensive that was approaching the Yalu River. After the Korean conflict stalemated, China sought to balance its identification as a member of the Soviet bloc by establishing friendly relations with Pakistan and other Third World countries, particularly in Southeast Asia. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1960s, Beijing competed with Moscow for political influence among communist parties and in the developing world generally. Following the 1968 Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia and clashes in 1969 on the Sino-Soviet border, Chinese competition with the Soviet Union increasingly reflected concern over China's own strategic position. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In late 1978, the Chinese also became concerned over Vietnam's efforts to establish open control over Laos and Cambodia, though it is because of Cambodian's brutality led to invasion. In response to the Vietnamese invasion of Cambodia, China fought a brief border war with Vietnam (February–March 1979) with the stated purpose of &amp;quot;teaching Vietnam a lesson.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chinese anxiety about Soviet strategic advances was heightened following the Soviet Union's December 1979 invasion of Afghanistan. Sharp differences between China and the Soviet Union persisted over Soviet support for Vietnam's continued occupation of Cambodia, the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, and Soviet troops along the Sino-Soviet border and in Mongolia—the so-called &amp;quot;three obstacles&amp;quot; to improved Sino-Soviet relations. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1970s and 1980s, China sought to create a secure regional and global environment for itself and to foster good relations with countries that could aid its economic development. To this end, China looked to the West for assistance with its modernization drive and for help in countering Soviet expansionism, which is characterized as the greatest threat to its national security and to world peace. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China maintained its consistent opposition to &amp;quot;superpower hegemony,&amp;quot; focusing almost exclusively on the expansionist actions of the Soviet Union and Soviet proxies such as Vietnam and Cuba, but it also placed growing emphasis on a foreign policy independent of both the U.S. and the Soviet Union. While improving ties with the West, China continued to follow closely economic and other positions of the Third World nonaligned movement, although China was not a formal member. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the immediate aftermath of the Tiananmen crackdown in June 1989, many countries reduced their diplomatic contacts with China as well as their economic assistance programs. In response, China worked vigorously to expand its relations with foreign countries, and by late 1990, had reestablished normal relations with almost all nations. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union in late 1991, China also opened diplomatic relations with the republics of the former Soviet Union. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In recent years, Chinese leaders have been regular travelers to all parts of the globe, and China has sought a higher profile in the UN through its permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council and other multilateral organizations. Closer to home, China has made efforts to reduce tensions in Asia, hosting the Six-Party Talks on North Korea's nuclear weapons program, cultivating a more cooperative relationship with members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and participating in the ASEAN Regional Forum. China has also taken steps to improve relations with countries in South Asia, including India. Following Premier Wen's 2005 visit to India, the two sides moved to increase commercial and cultural ties, as well as to resolve longstanding border disputes. The November 2006 visit of President Hu was the first state visit by a Chinese head of state to India in 10 years. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Map South Asia.jpg|right|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
China has likewise improved ties with Russia, with Presidents Putin and Hu exchanging visits to Beijing and Moscow in April 2006 and March 2007. A second round of Russia-China joint military exercises is scheduled for fall 2007. China has played a prominent role in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), a regional grouping that includes Russia and the Central Asian nations of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan. Beijing has resolved many of its border and maritime disputes, notably including a November 1997 agreement with Russia that resolved almost all outstanding border issues and a 2000 agreement with Vietnam to resolve differences over their maritime border, though disagreements remain over islands in the South China Sea. Relations with Japan improved following Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's October 2006 visit to Beijing, although longstanding and emotionally charged disputes over history and competing claims to portions of the East China Sea remain sources of tension. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While in many ways Sudan's primary diplomatic patron, China has played a constructive role in support of peacekeeping operations in Southern Sudan and pledged to contribute an engineering unit in support of UN operations in Darfur. China has stated publicly that it shares the international community's concern over Iran's nuclear program and has voted in support of UN sanctions resolutions on Iran. Set against this has been an effort on the part of China to maintain close ties to countries such as Iran, Sudan, Zimbabwe, and Venezuela, which are sources of oil and other resources and which welcome China's non-conditional assistance and investment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===One Belt, One Road Initiative===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{Main article|One Belt One Road}}&lt;br /&gt;
Chinese officials are quite open that [[Belt and Road]] is aimed at creating a Eurasia wide Chinese led bloc to counter the United States.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China has been looking to construct a 120-kilometer mega canal cutting through the Isthmus of Kra, the narrowest part of the Malay Peninsula in [[Thailand]].  This will open the [[South China Sea]] to the [[Indian Ocean]], bypassing the Strait of Malacca.  What China is eyeing is a canal project in Thailand called the Kra Canal and the Thai leadership seems to be on board.  Through this canal, China is trying to reduce dependence on the Strait of Malacca. Currently, 80 percent of China's oil imports passed through the South China Sea. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Strait of Malacca is a key reason why China has not been able to grow too powerful.  Democratic and powers such as India, Australia, and&lt;br /&gt;
other Southeast Asian nations are well-positioned to cut off Chinese supply lines in the event of a major military confrontation by creating a&lt;br /&gt;
blockade around the Strait of Malacca.  China wants to ensure that its commercial and naval vessels find an alternate route that altogether avoids the Malacca chokepoint while traveling between the Indian and [[Pacific Ocean]]s. This is an overhang of the maritime portion of Xi Jinping's Belt and Road initiative that seeks to connect Southeast Asia with the [[Middle East]] and [[Europe]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Political Conditions==&lt;br /&gt;
In 1989, the [[Tiananmen Square democracy protests]] were inspired by an explosion of democracy protests worldwide, resulting in the [[Fall of the Berlin Wall]], the Czech [[Velvet Revolution]], and the collapse of Soviet Communism.  The Chinese protests however were quashed when the so-called &amp;quot;People's Liberation Army&amp;quot; killed over 10,000 Chinese people.  The Chinese Communist Party then established a registry of social organizations, in order to head off political upheaval.  [[Falun Gong]], a revival of pre-Maoist Cultural Revolution traditions, registered with the Chinese government in 1992.  It soon attracted “tens of millions of adherents,” the political-science professor Maria Hsia Chang writes in ''Falun Gong: The End of Days.'''  Falun Gong started holding enormous gatherings; by the mid- 1990s, there were more than two thousand Falun Gong practice sites in [[Beijing]] alone.  Troubled by the possibility that a large part of the population was becoming more loyal to Falun Gong than to the Communist Party, the government began cracking down on groups and banning sales of Falun Gong publications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 1999, the CCP estimated that the group had seventy million adherents; that year, more than ten thousand of them staged a silent protest in Tiananmen Square.  An arrest warrant was issued for Li Hongzhi, the group founder, who had by then immigrated to Queens, New York. The Chinese National Congress subsequently passed, and began [[violent]]ly enforcing, an &amp;quot;anti-cult law&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://web.archive.org/web/20101127131821/https://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/16/world/china-expels-53-foreign-falun-gong-followers.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On March 1, 2020, ten days before the World Health Organization declared the [[CCP virus]] a global [[pandemic]], the international China Tribunal published its Final Report declaring that the CCP had indeed performed hundreds of thousands of involuntary organ harvesting of hearts, lungs, kidneys, and livers from Falun Gong practitioners and other prisoners of conscience in a budding for-profit organ transplant industry for recipients worldwide.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://chinatribunal.com/china-tribunal-releases-judgment-2020/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Legal System===&lt;br /&gt;
The government's efforts to promote rule of law appeared to be advancing, but impossible under the political structure constructed around the Communist Party. After the Cultural Revolution, China's leaders aimed to develop a legal system to restrain abuses of official authority and revolutionary excesses. In 1982, the Communist's National People's Congress adopted a new state constitution that emphasized the rule of law under which even party leaders are theoretically held accountable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1979, when the drive to establish a functioning legal system began, more than 300 laws and regulations, most of them in the economic area, have been promulgated. The use of mediation committees—informed groups of citizens who resolve about 90% of China's civil disputes and some minor criminal cases at no cost to the parties—is one innovative device. There are more than 800,000 such committees in both rural and urban areas. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Legal reform became a government priority in the 1990s. Legislation designed to modernize and professionalize the nation's lawyers, judges, and prisons was enacted. &amp;lt;!--The 1994 Administrative Procedure Law allows citizens to sue officials for abuse of authority or malfeasance. In addition, the criminal law and the criminal procedures laws were amended to introduce significant reforms.--&amp;gt; The criminal law amendments abolished the crime of &amp;quot;counter-revolutionary&amp;quot; activity, although many persons are still incarcerated for that crime. Criminal procedures reforms also encouraged the establishment of a more transparent, adversarial trial process. The Chinese constitution and laws provide for fundamental human rights, including due process, but these are often ignored in practice. In addition to other judicial reforms, the Constitution was amended in 2004 to include the protection of individual human rights and legally-obtained private property, but it is unclear how those provisions will be implemented. Although new criminal and civil laws have provided additional safeguards to citizens, previously debated political reforms, including expanding elections to the township level, and other legal reforms, including the reform of the reeducation through labor (RTL) system, have been put on hold.  However, it is still impossible for certain groups to defend themselves as the legal system is constructed around the Communist Party.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Military==&lt;br /&gt;
The establishment of a professional military force equipped with modern weapons and doctrine was the last of the &amp;quot;Four Modernizations&amp;quot; announced by Zhou Enlai and supported by Deng Xiaoping. In keeping with Deng's mandate to reform, the People's Liberation Army (PLA), which includes the strategic nuclear forces, army, navy, and air force, has demobilized millions of men and women since 1978 and introduced modern methods in such areas as recruitment and manpower, strategy, and education and training. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:China military.jpg|left]]&lt;br /&gt;
Following the June 1989 Tiananmen crackdown, ideological correctness was temporarily revived as the dominant theme in Chinese military affairs. Reform and modernization appear to have since resumed their position as the PLA's priority objectives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Chinese military is in the process of transforming itself from a land-based power, centered on a vast ground force, to a smaller, mobile, high-tech military eventually capable of mounting limited operations beyond its coastal borders. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's power-projection capability is limited but has grown over recent years. China has acquired some advanced weapons systems from abroad, including Sovremmeny destroyers, SU-27 and SU-30 aircraft, and Kilo-class diesel submarines from Russia, and continued to develop domestic production capabilities, such as for the domestically-developed J-10 fighter aircraft. However, much of its air and naval forces continue to be based on 1960s-era technology. As the Defense Department's Quadrennial Defense Review, released February 2006, noted, the U.S. shares with other countries a concern about the pace, scope, and direction of China's military modernization. We view military exchanges, visits, and other forms of engagement are useful tools in promoting transparency, provided they have substance and are fully reciprocal. Regularized exchanges and contact also have the significant benefit of building confidence, reducing the possibility of accidents, and providing the lines of communication that are essential in ensuring that episodes such as the April 2001 EP-3 aircraft incident do not escalate into major crises. During their April 2006 meeting, President Bush and President Hu agreed to increase officer exchanges and to begin a strategic nuclear dialogue between STRATCOM and the Chinese military's strategic missile command. U.S. and Chinese militaries are also considering ways in which we might cooperate on disaster assistance relief. However, it should be remembered that the Military is still under the Party's control. It is not to be equated with the European and American Armed forces.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nuclear Weapons and Arms Control Policy ===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1955, Mao Zedong's Chinese Communist Party decided to proceed with a nuclear weapons program; it was developed with Soviet assistance until 1960. After its first nuclear test in October 1964, Beijing deployed a modest but potent ballistic missile force, including land- and sea-based intermediate-range and intercontinental ballistic missiles. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China became a major international arms exporter during the 1980s. Beijing joined the Middle East arms control talks, which began in July 1991 to establish global guidelines for conventional arms transfers, but announced in September 1992 that it would no longer participate because of the U.S. decision to sell F-16A/B aircraft to Taiwan. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China was the first state to pledge &amp;quot;no first use&amp;quot; of nuclear weapons. It joined the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1984 and pledged to abstain from further atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons in 1986. China acceded to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in 1992 and supported its indefinite and unconditional extension in 1995. In 1996, it signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) and agreed to seek an international ban on the production of fissile nuclear weapons material. To date, China has not ratified the CTBT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1996, China committed not to provide assistance to un-safeguarded nuclear facilities. China became a full member of the NPT Exporters (Zangger) Committee, a group that determines items subject to IAEA inspections if exported by NPT signatories. In September 1997, China issued detailed nuclear export control regulations. China began implementing regulations establishing controls over nuclear-related dual-use items in 1998. China also has committed not to engage in new nuclear cooperation with Iran (even under safeguards), and will complete existing cooperation, which is not of [[proliferation]] concern, within a relatively short period. In May 2004, with the support of the United States, China became a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Based on significant, tangible progress with China on nuclear nonproliferation, President Clinton in 1998 took steps to bring into force the 1985 U.S.-China Agreement on Peaceful Nuclear Cooperation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Missiles===&lt;br /&gt;
Although it is not a member of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), the multinational effort to restrict the proliferation of missiles, in March 1992 China undertook to abide by MTCR guidelines and parameters. China reaffirmed this commitment in 1994 and pledged not to transfer MTCR-class ground-to-ground missiles. In November 2000, China committed not to assist in any way the development by other countries of MTCR-class missiles. However, on August 29, 2003, the U.S. Government imposed missile proliferation sanctions lasting two years on the Chinese company China North Industries Corporation (NORINCO) after determining that it was knowingly involved in the transfer of equipment and technology controlled under Category II of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) Annex that contributed to MTCR-class missiles in a non-MTCR country. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2003, the P.R.C. promulgated comprehensive new export control regulations governing exports of all categories of sensitive technologies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economy ==&lt;br /&gt;
China's economy, based on rice and wheat farming, was generally prosperous until the 18th century. Population pressures and failure to adopt new technology led to an impoverished nation by 1900. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After Mao's death, the policy of modernization along Western lines has led to a remarkable rate of economic growth in the industrial cities, which have pulled in millions of peasants from the still poor rural areas. Slack environmental standards have led to serious pollution problems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The modern Chinese economy has benefited from investments from Taiwan and Hong Kong. They jumped far ahead of China by 1970 in terms of technology, and in recent years have invested in mainland industries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These two factors have changed the Chinese economy, from a command economy to a more socialist state, with the Chinese economy increasingly in the hands of privately owned businesses, not state- or military-run enterprises. However, after several years the trend reversed, as it is in the start that those who are related to the political power are treated differently than the rest of the enterprises. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:National Stadium, Beijing.jpg|thumb|250px|National Stadium, Beijing.]]&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1980 China has enjoyed the highest economic growth rates in the world. Suddenly in mid-2008, the growth rate slowed sharply from 11% a year to only 5.5%.  Much of the economy was geared to exports and building factories for exports to the United States and Japan.  When the [[Financial Crisis of 2008]] hit, exports fell off and prices for industrial products like steel fell in half.  Many factories were shut down.  The decline has especially hit steel, cement, and the construction industry.  The government in November 2008 announced a $586 billion stimulus program to build roads, dams, electric grids, and other infrastructure projects that are designed to supplement the international market.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;David Barboza, &amp;quot;Great Engine of China Slows ,&amp;quot; [https://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/26/business/worldbusiness/26chinasteel.html?_r=1  ''New York Times'' Nov. 25, 2008]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1979, China has largely rejected socialism and embraced capitalism, while maintaining Communist party rule.  Private ownership of the means of production has dramatically reduced poverty and increased wealth, especially in the cities but also in rural areas.  Nationally the GDP (in 2007 prices) has exploded from 2 trillion yuan in 1980 to 25 trillion in 2007.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As late as 1980 60% of the people in rural China lives in poverty; by 2007 fewer than 5% did. Grain production has grown 300 to 500 tons per person, and rural income per person has soared from a few hundred yuan in 1980 to over 4000.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See ''Economist'' Dec. 13, 2008&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The reforms reformed and opened its economy. The Chinese leadership has adopted a more pragmatic perspective on many political and socioeconomic problems and has reduced the role of ideology in economic policy. China's ongoing economic transformation has had a profound impact not only on China but on the world. The market-oriented reforms China has implemented over the past two decades have unleashed individual initiative and entrepreneurship. The result has been the largest reduction of poverty and one of the fastest increases in income levels ever seen. China today is the fourth-largest economy in the world. It has sustained average economic growth of over 9.5% for the past 26 years. In 2006 its $2.76 trillion economy was about one-fifth the size of the U.S. economy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1980s, China tried to combine central planning with market-oriented reforms to increase productivity, living standards, and technological quality without exacerbating inflation, unemployment, and budget deficits. China pursued agricultural reforms, dismantling the commune system and introducing a household-based system that provided peasants greater decision-making in agricultural activities. The government also encouraged nonagricultural activities such as village enterprises in rural areas, and promoted more self-management for state-owned enterprises, increased competition in the marketplace, and facilitated direct contact between Chinese and foreign trading enterprises. China also relied more on foreign financing and imports. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the 1980s, these reforms led to average annual rates of growth of 10% in agricultural and industrial output. Rural per capita real income doubled. China became self-sufficient in grain production; rural industries accounted for 23% of agricultural output, helping absorb surplus labor in the countryside. The variety of light industrial and consumer goods increased. Reforms began in the fiscal, financial, banking, price-setting, and labor systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the late 1980s, however, the economy had become overheated with increasing rates of inflation. At the end of 1988, in reaction to a surge of inflation caused by accelerated price reforms, the leadership introduced an [[Ascesis|austerity]] program. &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Shanghai China CIA.jpg|thumb|left|280px|The Oriental Pearl Tower in Shanghai overlooks the Huangpu River.]]&lt;br /&gt;
China's economy regained momentum in the early 1990s. During a visit to southern China in early 1992, China's paramount leader at the time, Deng Xiaoping, made a series of political pronouncements designed to reinvigorate the process of economic reform. The 14th Party Congress later in the year backed Deng's renewed push for market reforms, stating that China's key task in the 1990s was to create a &amp;quot;socialist market economy.&amp;quot; The 10-year development plan for the 1990s stressed continuity in the political system with bolder reform of the economic system. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's economy grew at an average rate of 10% per year during the period 1990–2004, the highest growth rate in the world. China's gross domestic product (GDP) grew 10.0% in 2003, and even faster, 10.1%, in 2004, and 9.9% in 2005 despite attempts by the government to cool the economy. China's total trade in 2006 surpassed $1.76 trillion, making China the world's third-largest trading nation after the U.S. and Germany. Such high growth is necessary if China is to generate the 15 million jobs needed annually—roughly the size of Ecuador or Cambodia—to employ new entrants into the job market. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, serious imbalances exist behind the spectacular trade performance, high investment flows, and high GDP growth. High numbers of non-performing loans weigh down the state-run banking system. Inefficient state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are still a drag on growth, despite announced efforts to sell, merge, or close the vast majority of SOEs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Social and economic indicators have improved since reforms were launched, but rising inequality is evident between the more highly developed coastal provinces and the less developed, poorer inland regions. According to World Bank estimates, more than 152 million people in China in 2003—mostly in rural areas of the lagging inland provinces—still live in poverty, on consumption of less than U.S. $1 a day. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Following the Chinese Communist Party's Third Plenum, held in October 2003, Chinese legislators unveiled several proposed amendments to the state constitution. One of the most significant was a proposal to provide protection for private property rights. Legislators also indicated there would be a new emphasis on certain aspects of overall government economic policy, including efforts to reduce unemployment (now in the 8-10% range in urban areas), to rebalance income distribution between urban and rural regions, and to maintain economic growth while protecting the environment and improving social equity. The National People's Congress approved the amendments when it met in March 2004. The Fifth Plenum in October 2005 approved the 11th Five-Year Economic Program aimed at building a &amp;quot;harmonious society&amp;quot; through a more balanced wealth distribution and improved education, medical care, and social security.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 2020 under Communism, China had a ''per capita'' income below [[Mexico]] but above the [[Dominican Republic]]. 40% of the population lives on less than $5 per day.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The [[mainstream media]] praised the Chinese economy&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/15/economy/china-gdp-intl-hnk/index.html&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, and boasted about how China will overtake the US economy before 2030.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/chinas-economy-will-be-no-1-less-20-years-us-flna1C7511557&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; [[China]] actually may overtake the US economy, based on the trends and if the United States doesn't speed up, which makes the mainstream media, and especially Joe Biden, happy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===From 11th to 2nd Largest Economy===&lt;br /&gt;
In 1985, based on [[IMF]] data&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/SPROLLs/world-economic-outlook-databases&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, China was the eleventh largest economy, with a GDP of $313 billion, below the United States, Soviet Union, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Canada, Spain, and the Netherlands. China quickly got to tenth in 1990, with its $398 billion. China managed to get to eight in just five years, with a GDP of $737 billion. However, during this time, the Russian economy was collapsing, which meant that China went to seventh. The Italian economy got overtaken by the Chinese economy of $1.215 trillion in 2000. However, China nearly tied France and England around the $2.5 trillion mark. When the [[2008 financial crisis]] hit America and Europe, China boomed even further, becoming the 3rd largest economy in 2010, nearly tying Japan, with a $6 trillion GDP. It went up to $11 trillion in 2015, clearly becoming the 2nd largest economy. In 2020, it hit 100 trillion yuan ($15.21 trillion), when the United States went down to $20 trillion, and Japan went down to $5 trillion, because of the [[CCP pandemic]]. China is expected to get to $25 trillion in 2025 and possibly hit $33 trillion in 2030, getting the United States' 30 trillion. The media appears to be cheering for China.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://danaloesch.com/some-media-democrats-diligently-defending-communist-china/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2050, China could dwarf and double the US economy and military, with an overwhelming $100 trillion GDP, based on PricewaterhouseCoopers projections. China is eager to get the 1st place from the US and promote its agenda in an extreme way, even through killing 1.5 million people through a biological weapon, the Coronavirus.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://news.yahoo.com/china-wants-coronavirus-over-world-103022425.html?guccounter=1&amp;amp;guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmluZy5jb20v&amp;amp;guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABU08fCU41_1iiHCipf28-7_ZzDeZ1xsqnWjIlewL_m1LPsgFnAbOgcC_r8OzFxnOTfAnJMDLX7qEvI-y0LbA0-MMZvle-8bHV9JlIOcxi57gVNTu2Zg8hkvUxKU0OGbiV5D3O3y5RMKgfg0lxQzQL54IzVrdjsONW6tsdqj6icA&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Agriculture===&lt;br /&gt;
China is the world's most populous country and one of the largest producers and consumers of agricultural products. Roughly half of China's labor force is engaged in agriculture, even though only 10% of the land is suitable for cultivation and agriculture contributes only 13% of China's GDP. China's cropland area is only 75% of the U.S. total, but China still produces about 30% more crops and livestock than the U.S. because of intensive cultivation, China is among the world's largest producers of rice, corn, wheat, soybeans, vegetables, tea, and pork. Major non-food crops include cotton, other fibers, and oilseeds. China hopes to further increase agricultural production through improved plant stocks, fertilizers, and technology. Incomes for Chinese farmers are stagnating, leading to an increasing wealth gap between the cities and the countryside. Government policies that continue to emphasize grain self-sufficiency and the fact that farmers do not own—and cannot buy or sell—the land they work have contributed to this situation. While this was the case in China before Communism, many other countries have since embrace individual ownership while China has not. In addition, inadequate port facilities and lack of warehousing and cold storage facilities impede both domestic and international agricultural trade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Industry===&lt;br /&gt;
{{History of China (full)}}&lt;br /&gt;
Industry and construction account for about 46% of China's GDP. Major industries are mining and ore processing; iron; steel; aluminum; coal, machinery; textiles and apparel; armaments; petroleum; cement; chemicals; fertilizers; consumer products including footwear, toys, and electronics; automobiles and other transportation equipment including rail cars and locomotives, ships, and aircraft; and telecommunications. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China has the longest and most-used high-speed rail network in the world. China's high-speed rail network accounts for two-thirds of the world's total high-speed rail networks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China has become a preferred destination for the relocation of global manufacturing facilities. Its strength as an export platform has contributed to incomes and employment in China. The state-owned sector still accounts for about 40% of GDP. In recent years, authorities have been giving greater attention to the management of state assets—both in the financial market as well as among state-owned-enterprises—and progress has been noteworthy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Regulatory Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
Though China's economy has expanded rapidly, its regulatory environment has not kept pace. Since Deng Xiaoping's open market reforms, the growth of new businesses has outpaced the government's ability to regulate them. This has created a situation where businesses, faced with mounting competition and poor oversight, will be willing to take drastic measures to increase profit margins, often at the expense of consumer safety. This issue has recently acquired more prominence, with a number of restrictions being placed on problematic Chinese exports by the U.S. The Chinese Government recognizes the severity of the problem, recently concluding that up to 20% of the country's products are substandard or tainted. However, the level of the Chinese corporate taxes is actually 60% of the annual income. Moreover, in September 2017 the Communist Regime announced that private enterprises that are over 50 employees are required to set up party branches.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Energy===&lt;br /&gt;
Together with strong economic growth, China's demand for energy is surging rapidly. In 2003, China surpassed Japan to become the second-largest consumer of primary energy, after the United States. China is the world's second-largest consumer of oil, after the United States, and for 2006, China's increase in oil demand represented 38% of the world total increase in oil demand. China is also the third-largest energy producer in the world, after the United States and Russia. China's electricity consumption is expected to grow by over 4% a year through 2030, which will require more than $2 trillion in electricity infrastructure investment to meet the demand. China expects to add approximately 15,000 megawatts of generating capacity a year, with 20% of that coming from foreign suppliers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coal makes up the bulk of China's energy consumption (70% in 2005), and China is the largest producer and consumer of coal in the world. As China's economy continues to grow, China's coal demand is projected to rise significantly. Although coal's share of China's overall energy consumption will decrease, coal consumption will continue to rise in absolute terms. China's continued and increasing reliance on coal as a power source has contributed significantly to putting China on the path to becoming the world's largest emitter of acid rain-causing sulfur dioxide and greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 11th Five-Year Program, announced in 2005, calls for greater energy conservation measures, including the development of renewable energy sources and increased attention to environmental protection. Moving away from coal towards cleaner energy sources including oil, natural gas, renewable energy, and nuclear power is an important component of China's development program. China has abundant hydroelectric resources; the Three Gorges Dam, for example, will have a total capacity of 18 gigawatts when fully on-line (projected for 2009). In addition, the share of electricity generated by nuclear power is projected to grow from 1% in 2000 to 5% in 2030. China's renewable energy law, which went into effect in 2006, calls for 10% of its energy to come from renewable energy sources by 2020. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since 1993, China has been a net importer of oil, a large portion of which comes from the Middle East. Net imports are expected to rise to 3.5 million barrels per day by 2010. China is interested in diversifying the sources of its oil imports and has invested in oil fields around the world. Beijing also plans to increase China's natural gas production, which currently accounts for only 3% of China's total energy consumption. Analysts expect China's consumption of natural gas to more than double by 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In May 2004, then-Secretary of Energy Spencer Abraham signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with China's National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) that launched the U.S.-China Energy Policy Dialogue. The Dialogue has strengthened energy-related interactions between China and the United States, the world's two largest energy consumers. The U.S.-China Energy Policy Dialogue builds upon the two countries' existing cooperative ventures in high energy nuclear physics, fossil energy, energy efficiency, and renewable energy and energy information exchanges. The NDRC and the Department of Energy also exchange views and expertise on Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Technologies, and we convene an annual Oil and Gas Industry Forum with China. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Environment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheism and the environment#Atheist controlled communist China and the environment|China and the environment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Tianmenshan mountain.jpg|thumb|left|300px|Tian Shan, Gong Yuan, or Sky Mountain park, literally, is a world heritage site.]]&lt;br /&gt;
One of the serious negative consequences of China's rapid industrial development has been increased pollution and degradation of natural resources. China is widely expected to surpass the United States as the world's largest emitter of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases sometime in 2007 or 2008. A World Health Organization report on air quality in 272 cities worldwide concluded that seven of the world's 10 most polluted cities were in China. According to China's own evaluation, two-thirds of the 338 cities for which air-quality data are available are considered polluted—two-thirds of them moderately or severely so. Respiratory and heart diseases related to air pollution are the leading cause of death in China. Almost all of the nation's rivers are considered polluted to some degree, and half of the population lacks access to clean water. By some estimates, every day approximately 300 million residents drink contaminated water. Ninety percent of urban water bodies are severely polluted. Water scarcity also is an issue; for example, severe water scarcity in Northern China is a serious threat to sustained economic growth and the government has begun working on a project for a large-scale diversion of water from the Yangtze River to northern cities, including Beijing and Tianjin. Acid rain falls on 30% of the country. Various studies estimate pollution costs the Chinese economy 7%-10% of GDP each year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's leaders are increasingly paying attention to the country's severe environmental problems. In 1998, the State Environmental Protection Administration (SEPA) was officially upgraded to a ministry-level agency, reflecting the growing importance the Chinese Government places on environmental protection. In recent years, China has strengthened its environmental legislation and made some progress in stemming from environmental deterioration. In 2005, China joined the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development, which brings industries and governments together to implement strategies that reduce pollution and address climate change. During the 10th Five-Year Plan, China plans to reduce total emissions by 10%. Beijing in particular is investing heavily in pollution control as part of its campaign to host a successful Olympiad in 2008. Some cities have seen improvements in air quality in recent years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China is an active participant in climate change talks and other multilateral environmental negotiations, taking environmental challenges seriously but pushing for the developed world to help developing countries to a greater extent. It is a signatory to the Basel Convention governing the transport and disposal of hazardous waste and the Montreal Protocol for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, as well as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species and other major environmental agreements. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The question of environmental impacts associated with the Three Gorges Dam project has generated controversy among environmentalists inside and outside China. Critics claim that erosion and silting of the Yangtze River threaten several endangered species, while Chinese officials say the dam will help prevent devastating floods and generate clean hydroelectric power that will enable the region to lower its dependence on coal, thus lessening air pollution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and China are members of the Asia Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate (APP). The APP is a public-private partnership of six nations—Australia, China, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, and the United States—committed to explore new mechanisms to meet national pollution reduction, energy security, and climate change goals in ways that reduce poverty and promote economic development. APP members have undertaken cooperative activities involving the deployment of clean technology in partner countries in eight areas: cleaner fossil energy, renewable energy and distributed generation, power generation and transmission, steel, aluminum, cement, coal mining, and buildings and appliances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States and China have been engaged in an active program of bilateral environmental cooperation since the mid-1990s, with an emphasis on clean energy technology and the design of effective environmental policy. While both governments view this cooperation positively, China has often compared the U.S. program, which lacks a foreign assistance component, with those of Japan and several European Union (EU) countries that include generous levels of aid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Science and Technology===&lt;br /&gt;
Science and technology have always preoccupied China's leaders; indeed, China's political leadership comes almost exclusively from technical backgrounds and has a high regard for science. Deng called it &amp;quot;the first productive force.&amp;quot; Distortions in the economy and society created by party rule have severely hurt Chinese science, according to some Chinese science policy experts. The Chinese Academy of Sciences, modeled on the Soviet system, puts much of China's greatest scientific talent in a large, under-funded apparatus that remains largely isolated from industry, although the reforms of the past decade have begun to address this problem. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chinese science strategists see China's greatest opportunities in newly emerging fields such as biotechnology and computers, where there is still a chance for China to become a significant player. Most Chinese students who went abroad have not returned, but they have built a dense network of trans-Pacific contacts that will greatly facilitate U.S.-China scientific cooperation in the coming years. The U.S. space program is often held up as the standard of scientific modernity in China. China's small but growing space program, which successfully completed its second manned orbit in October 2005, is a focus of national pride. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The U.S.-China Science and Technology Agreement remains the framework for bilateral cooperation in this field. A 5-year agreement to extend the Science and Technology Agreement was signed in April 2006. The Agreement is among the longest-standing U.S.-China accords, and includes over eleven U.S. Federal agencies and numerous branches that participate in cooperative exchanges under the S&amp;amp;T Agreement and its nearly 60 protocols, memoranda of understanding, agreements, and annexes. The Agreement covers cooperation in areas such as marine conservation, renewable energy, and health. Biennial Joint Commission Meetings on Science and Technology bring together policymakers from both sides to coordinate joint science and technology cooperation. Executive Secretaries meetings are held biennially to implement specific cooperation programs. Japan and the European Union also have high-profile science and technology cooperative relationships with China.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Internet====&lt;br /&gt;
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has criticized Chinese censorship and restrictions on the Internet, and China is pushing back since the Communist Party considers Internet control essential if it is to maintain the stability of the country. Between 2006 and 2010, Google had a censored version of its search engine in mainland China on google.cn. In 2010, Google ended its censored mainland Chinese version, instead offering a link to the Hong Kong Chinese version, which does not censor search results, but is blocked in the mainland. The Communist Party promotes Internet use for commerce, but heavily censors content it deems pornographic, anti-social or politically subversive and blocks many foreign news and social media sites, including Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. The censorship is nicknamed the &amp;quot;Great Firewall of China,&amp;quot; which is based on the [[Great Wall of China]]. However, the censorship can easily be bypassed with a [[Virtual Private Network]] (VPN), colloquially known as 翻墙 (''fānqiáng'', lit. &amp;quot;going over the wall&amp;quot;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Poor Medical care===&lt;br /&gt;
Mainland China, like most Communist regimes, gives low priority to medicine and medical care. Mainland China only spends 1% of GDP on health care, ranking #156 out of 196 nations surveys by the World Health Organization. Many people rely on traditional practitioners, having more faith in acupuncture than modern science.  In any case, few have the opportunity to receive modern drugs or treatment with advanced devices. The local clinic has only a thermometer and stethoscope for instrumentation, and very few modern drugs. Only one in six medical personnel have a college degree, and those degrees are not high quality. The ordinary people want more medical care but that hardly matters, for in a  dictatorship violence matters, but not public opinion.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Gordon Fairclaugh, &amp;quot;In China, Rx for Ailing Health System,&amp;quot; ''Wall Street Journal,'' Oct. 15, 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===WTO membership===&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the CCP's human rights abuses in the Tiananmen massacre, no trade sanctions were ever leveled by Western Powers and globalists. China was rewarded for its human rights abuses in 2001, despite the absence of reforms, by being welcomed into the [[World Trade Organization]] with full membership and a year later granted [[Most Favored Nation]] trade status by the [[U.S. Congress]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's merchandise exports totaled $969.3 billion and imports totaled $791.8 billion in 2006. Its global trade surplus surged from $32 billion in 2004 to $177.5 billion in 2006. China's primary trading partners include Japan, the EU, the United States, South Korea, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. According to U.S. statistics, China had a trade surplus with the U.S. of $232.6 billion in 2006. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China has taken important steps to open its foreign trading system and integrate itself into the world trading system. In November 1991, China joined the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) group, which promotes free trade and cooperation in the economic, trade, investment, and technology spheres. China served as APEC chair in 2001, and Shanghai hosted the annual APEC leaders meeting in October of that year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China formally joined the WTO in December 2001. As part of this far-reaching trade liberalization agreement, China agreed to lower tariffs and abolish market impediments. Chinese and foreign businessmen, for example, gained the right to import and export on their own, and to sell their products without going through a government middleman. By 2005, average tariff rates on key U.S. agricultural exports dropped from 31% to 14% and on industrial products from 25% to 9%. The agreement also opens up new opportunities for U.S. providers of services like banking, insurance, and telecommunications. China has made significant progress implementing its WTO commitments, but serious concerns remain, particularly in the realm of intellectual property rights protection. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While accession does not guarantee smaller trade deficits, full implementation of all WTO commitments would further open China's markets to—and help level the playing field for—U.S. exports. China is now one of the most important markets for U.S. exports: in 2006, U.S. exports to China totaled $55.2 billion, almost triple the $19 billion when China joined the WTO in 2001 and up 32% over 2005. U.S. agricultural exports have increased dramatically, making China our fourth-largest agricultural export market (after Canada, Japan, and Mexico). Over the same period (2001-2006), U.S. imports from China have risen from $102 billion to $287.8 billion. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Export growth continues to be a major driver of China's rapid economic growth. To increase exports, China has pursued policies such as fostering the rapid development of foreign-invested factories, which assemble imported components into consumer goods for export, and liberalizing trading rights. In its eleventh Five-Year Program, adopted in 2005, China placed greater emphasis on developing a consumer demand-driven economy to sustain economic growth and address global imbalances. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The United States is one of China's primary suppliers of power generating equipment, aircraft and parts, computers and industrial machinery, raw materials, and chemical and agricultural products. However, U.S. exporters continue to have concerns about fair market access due to strict testing and standards requirements for some imported products. In addition, a lack of transparency in the regulatory process makes it difficult for businesses to plan for changes in the domestic market structure. The April 11, 2006 U.S.-China Joint Commission on Commerce and Trade (JCCT) produced agreements on key U.S. trade concerns ranging from market access to U.S. beef, medical devices, and telecommunications; to the enforcement of intellectual property rights, including, significantly, software. The JCCT also produced an agreement to establish a U.S.-China High Technology and Strategic Trade Working Group to review export control cooperation and facilitate high technology trade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Foreign Investment===&lt;br /&gt;
China's investment climate has changed dramatically in 24 years of reform. In the early 1980s, China restricted foreign investments to export-oriented operations and required foreign investors to form joint-venture partnerships with Chinese firms. Foreign direct investment (FDI) grew quickly during the 1980s, but stalled in late 1989 in the aftermath of Tiananmen. In response, the government introduced legislation and regulations designed to encourage foreigners to invest in high-priority sectors and regions. Since the early 1990s, China has allowed foreign investors to manufacture and sell a wide range of goods on the domestic market, and authorized the establishment of wholly foreign-owned enterprises, now the preferred form of FDI. However, the Chinese Government's emphasis on guiding FDI into manufacturing has led to market saturation in some industries, while leaving China's services sectors underdeveloped. China is now one of the leading recipients of FDI in the world, receiving almost $80 billion in 2005 according to World Bank statistics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As part of its WTO accession, China undertook to eliminate certain trade-related investment measures and to open up specified sectors that had previously been closed to foreign investment. New laws, regulations, and administrative measures to implement these commitments are being issued. Major remaining barriers to foreign investment include opaque and inconsistently enforced laws and regulations and the lack of a rules-based legal infrastructure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Opening to the outside remains central to China's development. Foreign-invested enterprises produce about half of China's exports, and China continues to attract large investment inflows. Foreign exchange reserves were $1.1 trillion at the end of 2006, and have now surpassed those of Japan, making China's foreign exchange reserves the largest in the world.&lt;br /&gt;
===Higher education===&lt;br /&gt;
Despite fears that China may be outpacing the United States in turning out engineers, the number of college students in China who study engineering is on the decline, according to ''[[Global Times]]'', a Chinese party-controlled newspaper. Fewer than one in 10 college graduates in 2009 majored in engineering. Instead, students are turning to economics, finance, and management, which pay more and carry more social status. &amp;quot;Engineering usually makes people think of factories, while factories often give people an impression of hard work, low wages, and layoffs,&amp;quot; the newspaper quoted one professor as saying.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although there are some considerable effort of developing the universities, the Communist regime is still having issues with academic freedoms, which means that some improvements will be made, but the overall environment will not change.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exodus of Chinese undergraduate and graduate students continues; as 180,000 left in 2008, about 25% percent more than in 2007, as more families were able to pay overseas tuition. For every four students who left in the past decade, only one returned; those with American PhDs in science or engineering the least likely to return.  The intellectual vitality, quality of science, pay scales, and political climate are much more attractive in the West.  Those who return to China risk being shunned as &amp;quot;foreigners&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/world/asia/07scholar.html?hp  Sharon LaFraniera, &amp;quot;Fighting Trend, China Is Luring Scientists Home,&amp;quot; ''New York Times'' Jan. 6. 2010]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Now the exodus are enlarged into high-school students and even primary school students.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The Chinese in Africa===&lt;br /&gt;
China has been spending huge amounts of money and time buying influence in various African countries.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Africa/Africa-Monitor/2011/0217/China-s-latest-trade-visit-to-Africa-reveals-a-different-approach-to-business]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; China has given 45 African countries $115 billion, a figure which is growing at 44% every year. Africa has many desirable resources such as [[diamonds]], [[oil]], and rare earth metals such as [[Indium]] which is used to make the touch screens for new high-tech devices such as [[Apple]]'s [[iPad]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://blogs.indium.com/blog/an-interview-with-the-professor/assembled-cost-of-an-ipad]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and [[iPhone]], often under [[sweat shop]] conditions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's aim in Africa seems to be to buy up the emerging markets of the developing nations there. China has a big population, but does not have many of the resources (see above) that they will need to improve themselves. When countries go through [[industrialization]] they need to use a lot more resources, and China does not have them. By buying up Africa they get these natural resources cheaply. They will also be able to use these resources as poker chips against the west.&lt;br /&gt;
US ambassador [[Johnnie Carson]] believes &amp;quot;China has no morals&amp;quot; in Africa,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/12/09/cable-kenya-risks-new-violence-reforms/]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; which may be true given their [[communist]] ideology.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== China and intellectual property theft ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See: [[Atheistic China and intellectual property theft|China and intellectual property theft]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== History ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{main|History of China}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Great Wall of China.jpg|right|240px]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although archaeologists have found settlements in China dating to [[5000 BC]], the earliest nation that can be dated in the area of modern China is the [[Shang Dynasty]], approximately [[2000 BC]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dynasty followed dynasty, as old regimes would lose the &amp;quot;mandate of heaven;&amp;quot; it was believed that each emperor ruled only with the approval of heaven, and a ruler who was unfit to rule would curse the nation until replaced.  In addition, the Chinese capital would occasionally be overrun by &amp;quot;barbarians,&amp;quot; who invariably would start a new dynasty in the Chinese capital, integrating their nations into the former dynasty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chinese had an advanced artistic culture and well-developed science and technology.  However, its science and technology stood still after 1700 and in the 21st century very little survives outside museums, except in for the popular forms of traditional medicine. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===19th and 20th century===&lt;br /&gt;
In the 19th and early 20th centuries, the country was beset by large-scale civil wars, major famines, military defeats by Britain and Japan, regional control by powerful warlords, and foreign intervention such as the [[Boxer Rebellion]] of 1900. In 1911 a revolution deposed the [[Qing dynasty]] and the [[Republic of China]] was proclaimed.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Under the leadership of the [[KMT]] (Kuomintang), headed by [[Chiang Kai-shek]] (1887-1975), the central government finally suppressed the local warlords who effectively controlled many provinces. The KMT tried to destroy the Communists under [[Mao Zedong]], but they escaped in the &amp;quot;Long March&amp;quot; of 1934–35. Japan seized Manchuria in 1931, and in 1937 invaded all of China, seizing the coast, the major cities, and setting up a puppet government that controlled most of the population. China was allied with the U.S. and Britain against Japan, and at war's end joined the United Nations as a permanent member of the 5-nation Security Council, with a veto.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The period from the [[Opium War]]s to the rise of [[New China]] under Mao is referred to in Communist Chinese history texts as the Century of Humiliation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Yan'an rectification movement===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|Yan'an rectification movement|Rectification}}&lt;br /&gt;
In northern Shaanxi Province, while sandwiched between the Japanese and the KMT, the CCP began the Yan’an Rectification Movement of mass cleansing, killing many people.  More than 10,000 were killed in the &amp;quot;rectification&amp;quot; process,&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;UJPRS&amp;quot;&amp;gt;US Joint Publication research service. (1979). ''China Report: Political, Sociological and Military Affairs.'' Foreign Broadcast Information Service. No ISBN digitized text March 5, 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; as the Party made efforts to attack intellectuals and replace the culture of the [[May Fourth Movement]] with that of Communist culture.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Twitchett, Denis and Fairbank, John K. ''The Cambridge History of China.'' {{ISBN|0-521-24336-X}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Borthwick, Mark. (1998). ''Pacific Century: The Emergence of Modern Pacific Asia.'' Westview Press. {{ISBN|0-8133-3471-3}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref name=&amp;quot;Apter&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Apter, David Ernest. (1994). Revolutionary Discourse in Mao's Republic. Harvard University Press. {{ISBN|0-674-76780-2}}&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  This type of repetitive massacre on such a massive scale did not prevent the CCP from eventually expanding its power to rule all of China. The CCP expanded this pattern of internal rivalry and killing from the small Soviet areas to the whole nation.  ''The Nine Commentaries on the Communist Party'' describes the Yan'an rectification movement as,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|&amp;quot;the largest, darkest, and most ferocious power game ever played out in the human world. In the name of “cleansing petty bourgeoisie toxins,” the Party washed away morality, independence of thought, freedom of action, tolerance, and dignity... Humiliation became a fact of life in Yan’an—it was either humiliate other comrades or humiliate oneself. People were pushed to the brink of insanity, having been forced to abandon their dignity, sense of honor or shame, and love for one another to save their own lives and their own jobs. They ceased to express their own opinions and recited Party leaders’ articles instead.&amp;quot;}}&lt;br /&gt;
Mao developed the techniques of &amp;quot;thought reform&amp;quot; (literally &amp;quot;washing the brain&amp;quot; in Chinese). Mao's tactics often included isolating and attacking dissenting individuals in &amp;quot;study groups.&amp;quot;  These techniques of pressure, ostracism, and reintegration were particularly powerful in China, where the culture puts great value on &amp;quot;saving face&amp;quot;, protecting one's innermost thinking, and above all, identifying with a group.  Individuals put through thought reform later described it as excruciating. The resulting changes in views were not permanent, but the experience overall seriously affected the lives of those who went through it. The CCP has used these same types of techniques on millions of Chinese since 1949.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Maoist revolution===&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|New China|History of the Chinese Communist Party}}&lt;br /&gt;
In 1945–46, the U.S. attempted to force a negotiated settlement between the KMT and the Communists, but failed.  In the face of economic collapse, the Communists won the civil war in 1949 under [[Mao Zedong]] established a totalitarian regime, forcing the elected constitutional ROC Government to Taiwan. Taiwan is recognized as an integral part of China in theory, but in practice has been independent since 1949. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mao liquidated millions of opponents, acting against the International society in the [[Korean War]] (1950–53), and around 1960 broke bitterly with the Soviet Union over the control of the Communist world.  Mao's regime imposed strict controls over everyday life and cost the lives of tens of millions of people.  Mao bluntly said,&lt;br /&gt;
{{quotebox|“What can Emperor [[Qin Shi Huang]] brag about? He only killed 460 [[Confucius|Confucian]] scholars, but we killed 46,000 intellectuals. There are people who accuse us of practicing dictatorship like Emperor Qin Shi Huang, and we admit to it all. It fits the reality. It is a pity that they did not give us enough credit, so we need to add to it.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;http://www.ninecommentaries.com/english-3&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Post-Maoism===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Concrete-in-china-info.png|left|220px|thumb|In the 3 years from 2011 to 2014, China used more cement than the US did in the entire 20th century.]]&lt;br /&gt;
After 1978, Mao's successor [[Deng Xiaoping]] constructed a market-economy system, while still remain de facto control over the land by imposing the length of usage of the land, and by 2000 output had increased, population growth ended (by imposing a one-child policy), and mediocre relations were secured with the West. For much of the population, living standards have improved and the material choices are growing, yet totalitarian rule and the ownership of the Internet still firmly gripped.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
China's economy during the last quarter-century has changed from a centrally planned system that was largely closed to international trade, to a more market-oriented economy that has a rapidly growing private sector and is a major player in the global economy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Most Favored Nation status with the U.S.===&lt;br /&gt;
As China has been growing in power, it has also become increasingly aggressive on the international stage.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Scaliger, Charles (February 19, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/print-magazine/item/31388-china-s-new-aggression-on-the-world-stage China’s New Aggression on the World Stage]. ''The New American''. Retrieved February 19, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Blanchard, Ben (September 24, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-anniversary-timeline/timeline-seven-decades-of-communist-china-idUSKBN1WA03Z Timeline: Seven decades of Communist China]. ''Reuters''. Retrieved September 25, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Newman, Alex (September 25, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/is-trump-really-to-blame-for-chinas-rise-at-the-un-as-media-claim_3094695.html China’s Subversion of the United Nations]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved September 26, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; The country's Communist Party also increased control over the country and economy,&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Byas, Steve (March 7, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/31676-chinese-communists-tighten-grip-as-70th-anniversary-nears Chinese Communists Tighten Grip as 70th Anniversary Nears]. ''The New American''. Retrieved March 8, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Li, Olivia (March 6, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/china-cracks-down-on-private-enterprises_2825959.html China Cracks Down on Private Enterprises]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved March 8, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Blanchard, Ben (March 7, 2019). [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-parliament-politics/in-sensitive-year-for-china-warnings-against-erroneous-thoughts-idUSKCN1QO0X0 In sensitive year for China, warnings against 'erroneous thoughts']. ''Reuters''. Retrieved March 9, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Timm, Leo; Hao, Nicole (December 24, 2019). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/year-in-review-for-communist-china-the-worst-is-yet-to-come_3180253.html Year in Review: For Communist China, the Worst Is yet to Come]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved December 24, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Adelmann, Bob (December 30, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/34476-china-facing-massive-headwinds-in-2020 China Facing Massive Headwinds in 2020]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; and foreign companies worked to appease the Chinese government.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Lowe, Tiana (August 15, 2019). [https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/woke-capitalism-cowers-to-china Woke capitalism cowers to China]. ''Washington Examiner''. Retrieved August 26, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Kraychik, Robert (October 14, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/10/14/rob-spalding-china-silenced-its-critics-buying-off-americas-elites/ Rob Spalding: China Silenced Its Critics by Buying Off America’s Elites]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved October 14, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Virgil (October 20, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/20/virgil-five-takeaways-from-capitalisms-kowtow-to-china/ Virgil: Five Takeaways from Capitalism’s Kowtow to China]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved October 21, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; China uses about half of the world's steel and cement/concrete. In the 3 years from 2011 to 2014, China used 6.6 gigatons of cement, which is more than the US did in the entire 20th century.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.gatesnotes.com/About-Bill-Gates/Concrete-in-China&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  China also worked to isolate Taiwan diplomatically.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Schmitt, Gary (September 26, 2019). [https://thehill.com/opinion/international/463290-china-is-quietly-winning-the-diplomatic-war-with-taiwan China is quietly winning the diplomatic war with Taiwan]. ''The Hill''. Retrieved September 26, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; China became the dominant trading partner of a large majority of the world's countries, overtaking the U.S.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://twitter.com/MhaskarChief/status/1198862204876931072 Zeeshan Mhaskar]. ''Twitter''. November 24, 2019. Retrieved December 1, 2019.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;See also:&lt;br /&gt;
*Akan, Emel (January 6, 2020). [https://www.theepochtimes.com/chinas-rise-had-a-negative-impact-on-global-innovation-say-experts_3195603.html China’s Rise Has Had Negative Impact on Global Innovation, Experts Say]. ''The Epoch Times''. Retrieved January 6, 2020.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; Under Xi Jinping, China regressed back to Mao's totalitarianism.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Adelmann, Bob (December 30, 2019). [https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/asia/item/34470-china-s-xi-jinping-is-now-the-people-s-leader China’s Xi Jinping Is Now the “People’s Leader”]. ''The New American''. Retrieved December 30, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Wuhan Coronavirus epidemic ===&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:WHO-CCP Wuhan virus.PNG|right|300px|thumb|The WHO, headed by a Marxist [[fellow traveller]], publicly announced that the Wuhan virus posed no threat of contagious reaction between humans.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://dailycaller.com/2020/03/18/flashback-who-china-coronavirus-contagious/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
:{{See also|CCP virus|CCP global pandemic|Atheism and the Wuhan coronavirus epidemic|Wuhan coronavirus - Chinese Communist Party response}}&lt;br /&gt;
China agreed to the Biological Weapons Convention in 1984, but both academics and government agencies have asserted that the regime is a world leader in [[bioweapon]] production.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/questions-surround-canadian-shipment-of-deadly-viruses-to-china-66254&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;   The [[U.S. State Department]] and other agencies stating publicly in 2009 that they believe China has offensive biological agents.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.voanews.com/archive/china-denies-us-report-it-has-biological-weapons-capabilities&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  China is “commonly considered to have an active biological warfare program,” says the Federation of American Scientists. An official with the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defence charged that China is the world leader in toxin “threats.”&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2019/7/23/defense-officials-see-increased-threat-from-chinese-russian-chembio-weapon&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In July 2019. [[Xiangguo Qiu]] and a number of Qiu's students were forcibly removed from Canada's only level-4 laboratory.  A Level 4 virology facility is a lab equipped to work with the most serious and deadly human and animal diseases. The laboratory in Winnepeg, [[Manitoba]] is one of only a handful in [[North America]] capable of handling pathogens requiring the highest level of containment.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/chinese-researcher-escorted-from-infectious-disease-lab-amid-rcmp-investigation-1.5211567&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bio-warfare experts questioned why Canada was sending lethal viruses to China.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://edmontonjournal.com/health/bio-warfare-experts-question-why-canada-was-sending-lethal-viruses-to-china/wcm/fce2a521-4ce1-4eb0-8ccf-43f165713c0b/&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The unity within the Chinese Communist Party is shattering as all three factions (Shanghai, Beijing, and Zhenjiang) in the party are embroiled in a feud.  The Shanghai faction is led by Jiang Zemin, the Beijing faction is led by [[Hu Jintao]], and the Zhenjiang faction is led by President Xi Jinping.  Each one of the three is trying to nullify the influence of the other faction. Since 2012, when Xi Jinping took office political oppression has intensified and it has blanketed China. Press, social media, film, arts, literature, and the Internet in China is heavily censored. Many intellectuals, Tibetans, Uighurs, lawyers, university students have been persecuted for voicing their opinions in favor of democracy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cracks appeared in Xi Jinping's hold on the Chinese Communist Party over the catastrophic handling of the [[CCP pandemic]].  This opened an opportunity for the Shanghai faction and the Beijing faction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Human Rights ==&lt;br /&gt;
Under Mao millions of Chinese died, no matter it is famine or political movements, they are all the results of Communism itself. The &amp;quot;[[Cultural Revolution]]&amp;quot; in the 1960s was an [[Cultural Marxist]] effort of eradicating Chinese culture endorsed by Mao in order to eliminate potential political elite that could act against the Communist Party; it set back China by decades, even after his death, the damage in the social morality is still remaining.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the mid-1980s the new leader [[Deng Xiaoping]] promoted rapid modernization. While Mao's memory was still revered, most of his brutal policies were ended and much economic freedom—and a dash of political liberalization—was allowed.  Intellectuals were encouraged to speak out again and to share in a new spirit of &amp;quot;democratization.&amp;quot; However Communist party leaders in 1986 warned that modernization must not be used as an excuse to introduce &amp;quot;bourgeois philosophies and social doctrines.&amp;quot; By late 1986 student groups began to demonstrate demanding more student participation in local government, a greater degree of democracy, and better living conditions.  As demonstrations escalated Hu Yaobang, the general secretary of the party, resigned, confessing that he had made major mistakes and would take responsibility for them.  It was a setback to political and economic liberalization, though Hu remained, out of office, a symbol of the potential for democracy.  Hu's death in April 1989, sparked widespread public rallies in favor of broad social changes in Beijing, Shanghai, and other major cities.  Tens of thousands of students defied a government clampdown to demonstrate in May in [[Tiananmen Square]] central Beijing.  The Party moved to kill dissent, sending uneducated rural troops into square on June 3–4; hundreds of demonstrators were killed, wounded, or arrested.  The world was appalled.  Following the savage repression of democrats in all major cities Deng Xiaoping appeared to be even more firmly in control. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The China country reports in the U.S. State Department's 2009 Human Rights Practices and International Religious Freedom Reports&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/eap/119037.htm U.S. State Department, ''2008 Human Rights Report: China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)'' Feb. 25, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; noted China's well-documented and continuing abuses of human rights in violation of internationally recognized norms, stemming both from the authorities' intolerance of dissent and the inadequacy of legal safeguards for basic freedoms. Reported abuses have included arbitrary and lengthy incommunicado detention, forced confessions, torture, and mistreatment of prisoners as well as severe restrictions on freedom of speech, the press, assembly, association, religion, privacy, worker rights, and coercive birth limitation. In 2006, China continued the monitoring, harassment, intimidation, and arrest of journalists, Internet writers, defense lawyers, religious activists, and political dissidents. The activities of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), especially those relating to the rule of law and expansion of judicial review, continue to be restricted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 China loosened its restrictions somewhat for the Summer Olympics. The government owns the Internet access and censor several websites to prevent the people from learning about the Communist regime and the evil root of the Communism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human rights failures remain a major concern. Abatement of pollution and improvements in systems to ensure food, drug, and product safety are major concerns,  especially after notorious episodes of exporting poisoned pet food, toothpaste, and infant formula.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By 2019, human rights in China had deteriorated significantly.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;Multiple references:&lt;br /&gt;
*Williams, Thomas D. (June 4, 2019). [https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2019/06/04/thirty-years-after-tiananmen-massacre-human-rights-in-china-worse-than-ever/ Thirty Years After Tiananmen Massacre, Human Rights in China ‘Worse than Ever’]. ''Breitbart News''. Retrieved June 4, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Schachtel, Jordan (June 4, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/30-years-later-tiananmen-square-massacre-highlights-continuing-evils-chinas-one-party-state/ 30 years later, the Tiananmen Square massacre highlights the continuing evils of China’s one-party state]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 4, 2019.&lt;br /&gt;
*Madden, Nate (June 4, 2019). [https://www.conservativereview.com/news/brutality-tiananmen-square-lives-chinas-oppression-dissidents/ The brutality of Tiananmen Square lives on in China’s oppression of dissidents]. ''Conservative Review''. Retrieved June 4, 2019.&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Repression in 2008===&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008 China's human rights record remained poor and worsened in some areas. During the year the government increased its severe cultural and religious repression of ethnic minorities in Tibetan areas and the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region (XUAR), increased detention and harassment of dissidents and petitioners, and maintained tight controls on freedom of speech and the Internet. Abuses peaked around high-profile events, such as the Olympics and the unrest in Tibet. As in previous years, citizens did not have the right to change their government. Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), both local and international, continued to face intense scrutiny and restrictions. Other serious human rights abuses included extrajudicial killings, torture and coerced confessions of prisoners, and the use of forced labor, including prison labor. Workers cannot choose an independent union to represent them in the workplace, and the law does not protect workers' right to strike.  The government continued to monitor, harass, detain, arrest, and imprison journalists, writers, activists, and defense lawyers and their families, many of whom were seeking to exercise their rights under the law.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;See [http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/eap/119037.htm U.S. State Department, ''2008 Human Rights Report: China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)'' Feb. 25, 2009]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
===Execution Controversy===&lt;br /&gt;
In December 2009, China executed a man named Akmal Shaikh for drug smuggling. There is evidence that Shaikh was mentally ill, but he was not given a psychological exam of any sort before the trial. He was not given an examination because the Chinese government declared that neither Shaikh or his family could prove he was mentally ill through documentation or family history. The British government made many requests for clemency, including at an eleventh-hour meeting with the Chinese ambassador, but they were consistently ignored.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-fg-britain-china30-2009dec30,0,4153003.story&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Organ harvesting===&lt;br /&gt;
{{See also|Forced organ harvesting}}&lt;br /&gt;
While the [[CCP pandemic]] unfolded the China Tribunal, an independent people's tribunal, released its full judgment on Chinese forced organ harvesting.  The panel was chaired by Sir Geoffrey Nice who previously led the [[prosecution]] of former [[Yugoslavia]] [[Prime Minister]] [[Slobodan Milosevic]] for [[war crimes]] at the International Criminal Tribunal and included other experts in law, transplant surgery, international politics, Chinese history and business.  The experts concluded that the grisly practice has continued unabated. In June 2019 the tribunal delivered its findings in [[London]], concluding beyond a reasonable doubt that state-sanctioned forced organ harvesting from prisoners of conscience has taken place for years in China on a significant scale and is still taking place.  The main organ supply came from imprisoned practitioners of the persecuted spiritual group [[Falun Gong]].  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Chinese regime has persecuted the group for more than two decades. Hundreds of thousands of adherents have been thrown into prisons, labor camps, and brainwashing centers where many have been tortured in an effort to force them to renounce their faith. The tribunal concluded that the Chinese regime sustained a campaign of forced organ harvesting constituted a crime against humanity. Many people have died indescribable hideous deaths for no reason, that more may suffer in similar ways, and that all of us live on a planet where extreme wickedness may be found in the power of those, who for the time being, are running a country that is one of the oldest civilizations known to modern man.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2gfN2_uOvTM&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== China and doping in the Olympic Games ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also'': [[Irreligion and unsportsmanlike conduct]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
German news website ''Deutsche Welle'' (DW) reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|A former doctor has revealed the massive extent of doping of Chinese Olympic athletes during the 1980s and 1990s. The whistleblower has claimed more than 10,000 athletes were doped in the state-backed program.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.dw.com/en/systematic-doping-of-chinese-athletes-in-olympic-games-revealed-by-former-doctor/a-41065227Systematic doping of Chinese athletes in the Olympic Games revealed by former doctor], DW&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== China and obesity ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Flag of the PRC.png|thumbnail|250px|right|China has the largest atheist population in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.thechapmans.nl/news/Atheist.pdf Top 50 Countries With Highest Proportion of Atheists / Agnostics (Zuckerman, 2005)]&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/05/23/a-surprising-map-of-where-the-worlds-atheists-live/ A surprising map of where the world’s atheists live], ''Washington Post'' By Max Fisher and Caitlin Dewey May 23, 2013&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In 2014, the British medical journal'' Lancet'' reported that the Chinese now have the second-highest obesity rate in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/05/29/as-obesity-rises-chinese-kids-are-almost-as-fat-as-americans/ As Obesity Rises, Chinese Kids Are Almost as Fat as Americans], ''Wall Street Journal'' Chinarealtime, May 29, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgJvV62yD2E Chubby China: Nation of 300 Million Overweight People]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A recent study published in the ''Obesity Reviews'' journal, found that Chinese teenagers' rate of [[diabetes]] was four times that of their [[United States|American]] peers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.china.org.cn/china/2012-09/14/content_26521029.htm Obesity is a growing concern in China] By Pang Li, China.org.cn, September 14, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[China and obesity]] and [[Atheism and obesity]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2014, it was reported that China's obesity rate has skyrocketed in the last 30 years and the Chinese now have the second-highest obesity rate in the world.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/05/29/as-obesity-rises-chinese-kids-are-almost-as-fat-as-americans/ As Obesity Rises, Chinese Kids Are Almost as Fat as Americans], ''Wall Street Journal'' Chinarealtime, May 29, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgJvV62yD2E Chubby China: Nation of 300 Million Overweight People]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  The ''Wall Street Journal'' reported in 2014 that China had approximately 300 million overweight people.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgJvV62yD2E Chubby China: Nation of 300 Million Overweight People]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  In 2014, the British medical journal ''Lancet'' analyzed weight trends in 188 countries and reported that more than 28% of Chinese adult men and 27% of the country's adult women are now overweight or obese.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2014/05/29/as-obesity-rises-chinese-kids-are-almost-as-fat-as-americans/ As Obesity Rises, Chinese Kids Are Almost as Fat as Americans], ''Wall Street Journal'' Chinarealtime, May 29, 2014&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to a 2012 report by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the number of obese children in China has reached 120 million.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_yk-aM0cyk Child Obesity Reaches 120 Million in China]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  A recent study published in the ''Obesity Reviews'' journal, found that Chinese teenagers' rate of [[diabetes]] was four times that of their [[United States|American]] peers.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.china.org.cn/china/2012-09/14/content_26521029.htm Obesity is a growing concern in China] By Pang Li, China.org.cn, September 14, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  Due to their past [[One-child Policy|one-child policy]], which had exceptions, China now has a lot of over-pampered and over-fed children.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yuf8yg0Dbig Rising Chinese Child Obesity and Fat Camps]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Matthew Crabbe, co-author of &amp;quot;Fat China: How Expanding Waistlines are Changing a Nation&amp;quot; declared that China's surging rate of obesity is &amp;quot;a ticking bomb&amp;quot; underneath the country's future economic growth and healthcare system.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.china.org.cn/china/2012-09/14/content_26521029.htm Obesity is a growing concern in China] By Pang Li, China.org.cn, September 14, 2012&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== China and baby meat-eating ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Communist China and baby eating]] and [[Atheists eat babies meme]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== China and cat/dog eating ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== China and dog meat eating ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''See also:'' [[Atheists and dog meat eating]] and [[Atheism and China]] and [[Atheism and stealing]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Chow chow.jpg|thumbnail|right|200px|Each year thousands of [[dog]]s are stolen in China and as many as 20 million dogs are killed in China to satisfy the dog meat industry.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.unilad.co.uk/featured/stop-pet-dogs-stolen-for-meat/ The Chinese Government Must Stop Pet Dogs Being Stolen For Meat] by JERRY GADIANO, Unilad website&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; See also: [[Atheists and dog meat eating]] ]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each year thousands of [[dog]]s are stolen in China and as many as 20 million dogs are killed in China to satisfy the dog meat industry.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.unilad.co.uk/featured/stop-pet-dogs-stolen-for-meat/ The Chinese Government Must Stop Pet Dogs Being Stolen For Meat] by JERRY GADIANO, Unilad website&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; In China, Chinese gangs have cropped up that kidnap pet dogs to sell to dog meat traders.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.unilad.co.uk/featured/stop-pet-dogs-stolen-for-meat/ The Chinese Government Must Stop Pet Dogs Being Stolen For Meat] by JERRY GADIANO, Unilad website&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== China and cat meat eating ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Communist China and cat meat eating]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2009, ''The Star'' reported: &amp;quot;China's ''Chengdu Business Daily'' estimated recently that as many as 10,000 cats are consumed throughout Guangdong everyday.&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2009/07/26/trying_to_get_cat_off_the_menu_in_china.html Trying to get cat off the menu in China], ''The Star'', 2009&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2009, ''The Telegraph'' reported:&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cquote|In Nanjing's north-western suburb of Pukuo, a hut stands in a field of rubbish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only clue to what goes on there is the pile of empty wooden crates at the back and the steel bars over the windows. Inside, there are crates full of cats, waiting to be shipped to the southern province of Guangdong, where they will feed a growing curiosity about the taste of cat meat.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the back of the shack, a man sitting on a makeshift bed was warming himself next to a charcoal brazier.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We collect 40 to 50 cats a day here,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;We ship them out when we have 100.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We make around eight mao (8p) on each cat, after our costs. We buy them for 10 renminbi (£1) and sell them for not much more.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each night, a train loaded with thousands of cats in crates heads south from a freight depot in Nanjing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chen Shi, 20, a mechanic working in a neighboring shop, said the depot had been in operation for three or four years. &amp;quot;The cats scream all night,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;Residents called the police but there's nothing illegal about it, so they couldn't do anything.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The fondness for eating dogs in northern China is well known, but cats are also prized in the country's south. One of the most famous Cantonese dishes is &amp;quot;Tiger and Dragon locked in Battle&amp;quot;, in which the flavors of cat and snake vie for attention.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cantonese appetite has already made cats scarce and expensive in Guangdong itself, forcing restaurants to look elsewhere for a steady supply. Nanjing, with its excellent transport links and central position in China, has emerged as the hub of cat trading.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/4061850/Cat-nappers-feed-Cantonese-taste-for-pet-delicacy.html Cat-nappers feed Cantonese taste for pet delicacy] By Malcolm Moore, Jan 1 2009, ''The Telegraph''&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==China and Sewage Eating==&lt;br /&gt;
It is common for street vendors in China to cook food in Gutter Oil, which is made from processed sewage. &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrv78nG9R04&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Further reading==&lt;br /&gt;
* Chow, Gregory C. ''China's Economic Transformation'' (2nd ed. 2007) [https://www.amazon.com/Chinas-Economic-Transformation-Gregory-Chow/dp/1405156244/ref=pd_sim_b_img_3 excerpt and text search]&lt;br /&gt;
*  Eberhard, Wolfram. ''A History of China'' (2005), 380 pages' [https://books.google.com/books?id=5LgjunIn1CEC&amp;amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;amp;dq=intitle:history+intitle:china&amp;amp;num=30&amp;amp;as_brr=1&amp;amp;sig=k1CgHXYb6jQ6BgdwVpUWngov7So full text online free] &lt;br /&gt;
* Entwisle, Barbara, and Gail E. Henderson, eds. ''Re-Drawing Boundaries: Work, Households, and Gender in China,'' U of California Press,  2000; on 1990; [http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt938nd0k8/?&amp;amp;query=&amp;amp;brand=ucpress complete text online free]&lt;br /&gt;
* Fairbank, John King and Goldman, Merle.  ''China: A New History.'' (1998). 546 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Gries, Peter Hays. ''China's New Nationalism: Pride, Politics, and Diplomacy,'' U of California Press, (2004); recent history [http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt9290249r/?&amp;amp;query=&amp;amp;brand=ucpress online edition free]&lt;br /&gt;
* Kang, David C. ''China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia'' (2007), argues a strong China stabilizes East Asia&lt;br /&gt;
*  Naughton, Barry. ''The Chinese Economy: Transitions and Growth'' (2007), important new survey&lt;br /&gt;
*Ogden S. (ed) ''China.'' (2006) &lt;br /&gt;
* Oi, Jean C.  ''Rural China Takes Off: Institutional Foundations of Economic Reform,'' U of California Press, (1999) [http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft8j49p1hv/?&amp;amp;query=&amp;amp;brand=ucpress complete text online free] &lt;br /&gt;
* Perkins, Dorothy.  ''Encyclopedia of China: The Essential Reference to China, Its History and Culture.'' (1999). 662 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Rawski, Thomas G.  and Lillian M. Li, eds. ''Chinese History in Economic Perspective,'' University of California Press,  1992 [http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft6489p0n6/?&amp;amp;query=&amp;amp;brand=ucpress online free]&lt;br /&gt;
* Roberts, J. A. G.  ''A Concise History of China.'' (1999). 341 pp.  &lt;br /&gt;
* Schoppa, R. Keith.  ''The Columbia Guide to Modern Chinese History.'' (2000). 356 pp.  [http://www.questia.com/library/book/the-columbia-guide-to-modern-chinese-history-by-r-keith-schoppa.jsp online edition]&lt;br /&gt;
* Shambaugh, David. ''China's Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation'' (2009)&lt;br /&gt;
* Shambaugh, David. ''Modernizing China's Military: Progress, Problems, and Prospects'' U of California Press,  (2003) [http://content.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/kt4779q33t/?&amp;amp;query=&amp;amp;brand=ucpress complete text online free]&lt;br /&gt;
* Spence, Jonathan D. ''The Search for Modern China'' (1991), 876pp; well-written survey from 1644 to 1980s [https://www.amazon.com/Search-Modern-China-Jonathan-Spence/dp/0393307808/ref=pd_sim_b_title_2 excerpt and text search]; [http://www.questia.com/read/98946348 complete edition online]&lt;br /&gt;
* Wang, Ke-wen, ed.  ''Modern China: An Encyclopedia of History, Culture, and Nationalism.'' (1998). 442 pp.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheistic China and alcoholism]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Atheistic China and loneliness]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chinese History]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chinese Painting]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[China and involuntary organ harvesting]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Great Wall of China]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Oriental art]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Previous Breaking News/China|Articles about '''China''' from previous &amp;quot;Breaking News&amp;quot;]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nuclear target structures]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Chinese National Day]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[China and obesity]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Traditional Chinese medicine]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.chinadetail.com/Nation/ All About China]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/country_profiles/1287798.stm BBC News - ''Country Profile: China'']&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ch.html CIA World Factbook - ''China'']&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.monthlyreview.org/1105wu.htm &amp;quot;Rethinking ‘Capitalist Restoration’ in China&amp;quot;] by Yiching Wu&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.gov.cn/ The Central People's Government of People's Republic of China]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.china.org.cn/ China's Official Gateway for News &amp;amp; Information]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.globalpolitician.com/articles.asp?ID=341 The Dragon's Dawn: China as a Rising Imperial Power] February 11, 2005.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.danwei.org/ Media, advertising, and urban life in China.]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://factoidz.com/the-largest-ethnic-group-in-the-world-han-chinese-of-china/ The Largest Ethnic Group in the World: Han Chinese of China.]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.chinaknowledge.org/History/Ming/ming.html Timeline, with maps and short histories from prehistoric era to present]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.academylink.com/et/CurriculumCenter/NHAHistoryInteractive/CHI/CHI_Index.html ancient and feudal China]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Asian Countries}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:China]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communist States]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Oppression]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Anti-American]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Police State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Welfare State]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Nuclear Defense]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>CCPSHILL</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>