https://www.conservapedia.com/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=BruceWConservapedia - User contributions [en]2026-10-11T03:06:55ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.35.14https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:KevinM&diff=484834User talk:KevinM2008-07-01T00:42:52Z<p>BruceW: </p>
<hr />
<div>==Removal of wikilinks==<br />
How else can ''we'' determine what pages are most wanted if you keep removing those links? [[User:NathanG|Nate]] 22:06, 22 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
:Those articles are ''protected against (re-)creation''. You ''can't'' create them. When people follow those red links, you will get to a "Permission Error" page (unless they're a sysop). I'm not doing this arbitrarily, don't worry. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 22:12, 22 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
::Hmm.. right, I should have checked up before accusing you of wrong. At least I wasn't dumb this time and blocked someone for doing some good... [[User:NathanG|Nate]] 22:15, 22 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
:::No worries. If you had briefly blocked me, I totally would've forgiven you. Mistakes happen, after all, and you would have done it to protect the project against a potential troublemaker. :) It also only occurred to me later on that not everybody might know that "salted" is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protected_deleted_pages#Creation_protection wiki-slang] for "protected against (re-)creation", so I'm not ''entirely'' innocent, I guess. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 22:22, 22 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==4chan==<br />
The article [[4chan]] was protected with a '''.''' as the reason. Technical error perhaps? [[User:RobertBobkins|RobertBobkins]] 15:01, 23 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
:No, it was salted: Deleted and protected against recreation. If you check [[Special:Protectedtitles]], you will see that several articles were protected that way some time ago. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 15:04, 23 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
::I looked in there and wow there are a large number of furry related titles protected. [[User:RobertBobkins|RobertBobkins]] 15:08, 23 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
:::Yes, it's quite a list. I disagree with a few of those pages being salted, but then I consider that we are still lacking more important articles, so this might be a battle to be fought later. --[[User:KevinM|KevinM]] 15:13, 23 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Good catch==<br />
Thanks! [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 16:27, 29 June 2008 (EDT)<br />
<br />
==Malfunction==<br />
Discussion moved to [[Talk:Jessica's Law]]<br />
<br />
==Block Rights==<br />
<br />
you're going about it all the wrong way... there are three ways to gain rights on this site<br />
<br />
*One, Work for many months/years, avoiding whatever personal topic another Sysop has hijacked, as tampering with these can lead to a quick block.<br />
*Two, be related to Andrew Schlafly. See [[User: College Republican]] You'll have to dig... as That user has only two edits... but happens to be Andy's Son<br />
*Three, be a racist bastard see [[User:Buglar]] <br />
<br />
Hope that helps [[User:BruceW|BruceW]] 20:42, 30 June 2008 (EDT)</div>BruceW